piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Kovoschiz (2023-04-01 09:38:34+00:00): Please use `building:part=` when it is a single tower.
Kovoschiz (2023-04-01 09:45:17+00:00): The entire outline being `building=apartments`. The podium/base  `building:part=` `=commercial` or `=retail`.
Taya_S (2023-04-01 08:01:19+00:00): *slenk, niet zeegeul
Diacritic (2023-04-01 08:16:09+00:00): Hey Razax,
Thanks for your contributions to the area.

The "living street" tag is generally reserved for streets in which pedestrians have right of way over cars.

I don't believe that's the case here, so I've changed the street back to residential.

Many thanks,

Dian.
Razax0 (2023-04-01 11:09:41+00:00): my bad in future I will take note. thanks for your feedback im a noob but id say I've definitely got a good grasp. thanks again for your feedback, glad to be here
BCNorwich (2023-04-02 11:58:55+00:00): I've removed your fictional motorway.
ivanbranco (2023-04-06 21:45:35+00:00): Hi,

I deleted this node tagged name=place. What were you trying to achieve?
NorthCrab_upload (2023-04-01 11:30:26+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o miejscowości.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10774805020

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
user_5359 (2023-04-01 09:16:40+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I reverted your SEO SPAM (mostly foreign keys).
Sammyhawkrad (2023-04-01 10:26:11+00:00): Hello Benjamin, welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for contributing to the map in Ghana.
I can tell from your hashtags that you are part of KNUST YouthMappers.

I have a few remarks about your changeset:
1. I see that you have added arbitrary house numbers to the buildings. Please only add house numbers if you can see it added to a building. 
2. You have also added building:levels and roof:levels to some buildings wrongly. Do well to understand the tags you use before you use them. If you don't know explicitly what they stand for please avoid them.
3. You also changed building types and other tags. My comment for no.2 stands. Don't use tags and values you don't know.

Every Door app gives you freedom to use tags but as a beginner I recommend you use StreetComplete [1] so that you don't make such mistakes.

I've been here before as a beginner,  keep learning and keep mapping. Have a lovely day

Sam

1- https://streetcomplete.app/
pantufla (2023-07-11 11:16:58+00:00): Hola. SEAT no debería ser todo en mayúscula puesto que es un acrónimo de 4 iniciales?
jmaspons (2023-07-11 16:05:21+00:00): Ostres, doncs potser sí. A l'ICGC apareixen les dues versions segons si és el polígon o la fàbrica http://www.icc.cat/vissir/index.html?E3X4ZcKbd però la web de la companyia sempre apareix en majúscules. Ho canvio. Gràcies per revisar-ho
pantufla (2023-07-11 16:53:14+00:00): Gracias a tu
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-25 00:11:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135322191 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes by a new user that broke relations; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135317731
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-25 00:11:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135322191 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes by a new user that broke relations; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135317731
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-25 00:11:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135322191 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes by a new user that broke relations; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135317731
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-03 10:48:43+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10777472657 - its it office?

place where fish are farmed?

something else?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-25 00:11:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135322191 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes by a new user that broke relations; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135317731
user_6110846 (2023-04-01 09:18:59+00:00): назва вулиці згідно рішення №215 у ZIP-файлі http://myrgorod.pl.ua/files/zip/Sessions/8-sklikannja/24ses.zip
literan (2023-04-01 10:57:17+00:00): в name указывает сегодняшнее общепринятое название (в данном случае зданий). Всякие там "Доходный дом купчихи Голенищевой" и прочее название объектов наследия не является общеупотребимым, и потому помещается в тег heritage:name
ig4map (2023-04-01 15:22:51+00:00): Спасибо, а как поступать, если эти названия присутствуют на табличке на доме, размером в ширину дома?
literan (2023-04-02 11:31:34+00:00): табличка размером во всю ширину дома? неужели ))

ну, замапить такую табличку, каким-нибудь тегом man_made=plaque...
NorthCrab_upload (2023-04-01 10:20:27+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10777581239

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Gregory Peony (2025-08-13 21:01:48+00:00): Hi, the changeset comment here is invalid: it does not relate to any feautre you edited. The relations themselves are valid however, provided the forests were mapped similarly to how they are now; it seems unnecessary to map these residential areas as multipolygons. They are not enveloped by another relation in which they should be inners, and so could just simply be mapped as residential areas. Mapping them this way means that other contributors will just have a harder time editing them. If you remember; why did you map the residential areas in this way? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon#Mapping_style,_best_practice for a comparison of two methods of mapping multipolygons. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134375807
Qitay (2025-08-13 21:16:20+00:00): I think I did it this way because of convenience, as the forest relation shares a lot of the lines with the residential area, it was easier to cut it and reuse them instead of creating overlapping lines. I agree it might be confusing for other users, I am sorry for that.
Gregory Peony (2025-08-13 22:35:32+00:00): Thanks for your informative and swift response. I was asking to see if I had missed some other reason as to why it would be better to map it the way you had. It great to have confirmation.

I forgive you and accept your appology ;)

Now I'll tell you about what I presume to be a fairly unknown feature in the ID editor, to make mapping similar features with simple areas that share nodes much more convenient. The two buttons you need to know are F and backspace. This works with lines and areas. 

Say we were to re-map the residential areas here using parts of the forest geometry. Select area (3) and click on a node you want to be shared by the residential area and forest, then click another in the direction you want to travel along the existing area. Now press or hold F to add shared nodes and use backspace to remove them. You can also click to add (non shared) nodes freely and follow multiple existing lines or areas. No need for splitting or messing around with relations. I hope this helps and is easier than the methods you are currently using. For a full list of ID shortcuts press "?" They aren't all discussed in the help section, so you may want to experiment and see what's possible.
Gregory Peony (2025-08-14 00:53:25+00:00): See https://osmcha.org/changesets/170413012 for my resolution of the residential areas mapped using multipolygons. 

While we're chatting, do you know  to make Ovum the alt name of Owom? Just because they're similar words?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134375807
Qitay (2025-08-14 21:01:29+00:00): In these regions (probably most of Nigeria) there was a lot of overlapping village names from some old import, most of the overlapping ones were very similar so when I stumbled upon some of these I added one as alt_name. I think the nodes from these old imports were later removed if they were not modified at all. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/2529746#map=6/9.36/8.73
In some regions this import was very bad as you can see in this conversation.
Qitay (2025-08-14 21:19:43+00:00): By the way, I wonder if there is some semi-automatic way to fix such multipolygons if they are indeed worse than adjoined regular areas. I think it could be done.
Gregory Peony (2025-08-17 18:55:24+00:00): Thank you for the context of the place import. 

I don't know if a tool already exists, but I agree that it should be possible to do it in a more automated way. I used the balloon tool to create the geometry and replaced an old way per closed loop of the relation to preserve history. Then deleted the excess ways and the type tag needs to be deleted. All of which I think could be semi-automated.

Modifying relations tends to be much easier in JOSM. I don't expect you to go back and change them all or anything like that (especially in ID). It should make it easier to map using simple areas in your future contributions.
Marc_ch (2023-04-10 23:30:51+00:00): Bonjour,
oui encore moi :)
pour quelle raaison avoir supprimé l'information sur l'emplacement de la bordure du trottoir https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3414409811/history ?
et avoir fusionné 2 tronçons de voie qui n'ont pas les mêmes caractéristiques https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/73885986/history ?
Salutations,
Marc
ivanbranco (2023-04-06 21:47:47+00:00): Ciao Facciolo, benvenut su OSM

questi dati erano già presenti (del tutto o in parte) sull'area scolastica, non trovo molto sensato aggiungerli anche alla recinzione.
collect (2023-04-02 02:09:45+00:00): 这。。。。
marczoutendijk (2023-04-20 18:54:00+00:00): Don't use name=hause!
building=yes (or house) will do!

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
literan (2023-12-15 16:10:03+00:00): и зачем вы всем дорогам города одинаковый тип присвоили? статусы дорог в OSM назначаются в зависимости от значимости https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Highway_classification

верну
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-07-30 06:57:02+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10777675609/history has fixme:type = geoglyp that was added in this edit
Is it geoglyph ? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dgeoglyph
Marc_ch (2023-04-01 22:17:42+00:00): Bonjour,
quel est la source de cet ajout ?
Salutationns,
Marc
vmicho (2023-04-02 09:14:17+00:00): Salut, La Croix est mentionne dan les guideposts. Et je l'ai trouve qqpart dans la carte
Marc_ch (2023-06-18 20:29:01+00:00): Bonjour,
j'ai supprimé le caractère unicode.
ainsi que cela vous a été demandé il y a longtemps https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/80030655
merci d'éviter cela. libre à vous de faire une app qui converti les mots en unicode si vous trouvez cela amusant.
Salutations,
Marc
vmicho (2023-07-01 16:39:02+00:00): Salut.
Mais ici onpeurrait le laisser car c'est directement ecrit. sur  le tableu si je me souviens bien (c'est meme possible qu'il y avait uniquement le symbole du train, cela se trouve assez souvent)
NorthCrab_upload (2023-04-01 11:30:24+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10777626162

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
LittleWolfCorban (2023-04-01 11:34:59+00:00): Naprawiłem nazwę ulicy z Zamoyskiego na Jana Zamoyskiego. To powinno być już ok
NorthCrab (2023-04-01 11:37:09+00:00): Tak jest! Dzięki :-)
literan (2023-04-02 12:36:07+00:00): их расставляет плагин для JOSM russian-address-helper. Сам им пользуюсь ) там был какой-то резон от его автора, в расстановке этих тегов, не помню
Владимир К (2023-04-02 17:33:19+00:00): ага, я тоже пользуюсь. резон - сравнить оригинальную запись из егрн с тем что плагин раскидал по тегам. в базе оно не надо
Marc_ch (2023-04-01 23:00:21+00:00): Bonnsoir,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3171990551/history
j'ai annulé l'ajout d'un passage piéton à l'endroit du rétrécissement de la chaussée, j'y suis passé encore aujourd'hui eet les 8 sont distant de plusieurs mètres. j'ai du coup créé un autre objet pour le passage piéton
Saalutations,
Marc
vmicho (2023-04-02 09:19:42+00:00): C'etait un peu bordel avant. Maintenant ca a l'air d'etre OK ;)
Marc_ch (2023-04-02 13:53:57+00:00): Bonjour,
la zone était très incomplete sur le détail mais en moyenne tout était très juste
c'est maintenant le bordel, merci pour ces nombreux ajouts mais je suis horrifié par le manque de qualité des ajouts :
de l'herbe a travers un abri https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1158952101
connecteur d'arrivée d'eau très précisément mais trop au sud alors qu'on la voie sur la vue sat https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10751704013
trotoirs qui s'arretent n'importe comment https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10777715037 et tag sidewalk pas mis à jour
hameau qui n'a aucun panneau avec un nom alternative que j'ai jamais entendu et bien étrange, ce qui fait penser à l'utilisation d'une source de donnée externe https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10777676123 et placé en plein milieu du champs et le tag pour lieu non habité alors qu'il y a des habitants
cheminement qui passe du mauvais coté d'autres objets
mur de soutainement autour du bac de la fontaine alors que c'est un bac et non un mur qui retient de la terre
et dans ce changeset vous amélioré des détails sur un objet qui n'existe plus depuis 6 mois
donc quand vous me dites que vous avez vu cela récement sur le terrain, c'est impossible.
je vous laisser terminer d'ajouter les détails que vous souhaitez, je passerai en revue le moindre objet après, hélas cela prend plus de temps de vérifier que d'ajouter et c'est surtout moins agréable
Salutations,
Marc
vmicho (2023-04-02 18:23:42+00:00): Salut.
1) la je nevois pas d'abri :0. En plus l'herbe est un fond, cela peut etre (comme forret / scrub) au dessous des batiments/abris. Le cote du batiment peut etre un abri mais c'etait deja mappe comme cela.

2) C'etait approx. Je l'ai deplace un peu: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1156147105
;)

3) les sidewalks - je les laisse en general a finir a plus tard. Je m'assure que c'est raisonablement connecte aux passages (pour une navigation correcte) ce qui peut sembler mois esthetique :/
Je l'ai prolonge un peu quand meme
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1158951346

4) pour La Croix - je l'ai vu physiquement sur guidepost et complete a partir de CH Topo :|

5) Pour les fontaines je fais toujours retaining wall, cela retient de l'eau qui este elevee. J'ai pas de meilleure solution.

Pour le reste : Oui j'ajoute par voir sur place et certaines choses par satellite, bien sur :]
S'il y a qqchose qui va pas, il suffit de dire bien sur.

PS: C'est quoi le truc qui n'existe plus?


A+
Marc_ch (2023-04-05 21:39:39+00:00): Bonsoir,

1) l'abri https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1160049971 j'ai corrigé le tracé de la pelouse

2)  du coup quel source pour le tracé de la première version ?

3) cela casse donc pour un certain temps le routage piéton pour mettre un peu de couleur sur la carte (alors que la pérsence d'un trotoir était déjà renseigné de manière non visuelle sur le highway=*

4) j’irai revoir les poteaux, depuis le temps que je cherchais à savoir si le nom "La Croix" dans l'adresse était le nom de la voie ou d'un lieu-dit... mais c'est peu probable que c'est le nom du champ là où  se trouve le nœud et le tag

5) donc toujours faux :) retain_wall serrait dans le cas d'un bac de fontaine enterré entouré de terre (comme le sont les murs d'une piscine). j'ai aussi corrigé l'étendue de l'eau (paarce que tant qu'à faire du micro maping, autant faire la surface juste)
le hic c'est que j'ai l'impression que ce que j'ai dis n'est pas vraiement pris en compte... on en a maintenant un mur de soutènement au milieu du rond pont... comme s'il y avait un bac de terre X 10aine de cm au dessus de la surface de la route.. il n'en est rien... on a un parc au milieu du rond point... je n’irai pas vraiment passé mon temps libre la... des pelouses sans un brin d'herbe... des broussaille sans un bout de bois...certes la carte est plus coloriée mais elle ne représente pas la réalité

PS le chemin inexistant https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/317156676 à travers le nouveau terrain de sport https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1160047505

Salutations,
Marc
DerSchmopf (2023-04-01 16:41:11+00:00): Warst du wirklich hier vor Ort um die Informationen zu prüfen? Die von dir wiedereröffnete Niederhutklause und das kleine Cafehaus sind zum Beispiel immer noch zu.
limes11 (2023-04-04 16:52:57+00:00): Er schreibt das alles von Webseiten ab. Anderswo funktioniert das gut. An der Ahr nicht. Sicher wird vieles richtig sein, aber eine Sisyphusarbeit, das alles durchzugehen. Falls du das manuell fixen kannst, gerne. Falls es zuviel ist, dann können wir den gesamten Änderungssatz zurücknehmen.
DerSchmopf (2023-04-05 18:46:08+00:00): Danke dir, dieselbe Vermutung habe ich auch. Deshalb würde ich eher seine ganzen Änderungssätze der letzten Tage hier an der Ahr entfernen, weiß aber nicht wie gemacht wird. Die anderen Änderungssätze sind ja auch so entstanden.
4004 (2023-04-02 00:06:50+00:00): а loc_name уже не существует? даже если там не преподают на польском
user_5359 (2023-04-01 13:31:20+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please noticed: An address is part of the (main) building, not of the highway or property. I revert your mistake.
user_5359 (2023-04-02 15:03:49+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/10777718549. What is the meaning of the tag sourceref = yes? Did you mean source:ref? But the value yes is wrong in this case.
Yurii Pylypenko (2023-04-02 15:21:43+00:00): Deleted this typo. Sometimes it happens unnoticed. If one put cursor in last row (it is communication:gsm=yes typically) to add new row (Tab + ref) sometimes popup menu with list of items, 'source' is first item. When adding hundreds of base stations sometime you do not notice this popup menu and after you type 'ref' it actually writes 'sourceref'
eggie (2023-04-01 12:56:40+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback...  Wanneer je oneway=yes tagt houdt er dan rekening mee dat tweewielers vaak zijn uitgezonderd. Is dat hier het geval?
Dan bijtaggen oneway:bicycle=no   en evt ook voor moped en mofa. 
motor_vehicle=no hoeft niet op een paaltje...  Wel toevoegen mofa en moped=yes ivt.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Daan1028 (2023-04-01 13:04:43+00:00): Bedankt voor de tips en je privebericht, ik zal het voortaan onthouden. 

Mvg,
Daan
Daan1028 (2023-04-01 13:13:17+00:00): Heb de paaltjes nu aangepast. Voor de eenrichting geld dit zover ik weet ook voor fietsers, aangezien de rijrichting aangegeven staat met verkeersbord d2, maar als dit niet klopt hoor ik het graag.

mvg,
Daan
eggie (2023-04-01 13:17:50+00:00): Zal zo even kijken. Op een bollard is het meeste yes en no default.
Moped mofa en horse wordt wel tegengehouden.. dus indien van toepassing zetten we die op = yes.
Fietsers en voetgangers zijn default yes.
gscholz (2023-04-02 05:12:51+00:00): Hi Bacana,
this changeset has left behind several errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-53.09440&lat=-25.41957&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=134378791

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Hufkratzer (2023-04-01 23:13:15+00:00): Hi,
an https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5505101 hast di das building=yes entfernt, deswegen ist das jetzt nicht mehr als Gebäude auf der Karte zu sehen.
Mit leisure=horse_riding sollte man auch keine einzelnen Gebäude, sondern das ganze Gelände von dem Pferdehof taggen, siehe
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure=horse_riding
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1125251227
NorthCrab_upload (2023-04-01 12:50:22+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10777805440
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10777805441
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10777805442

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
xRBKx (2023-04-01 13:03:29+00:00): Paczkomaty poprawione :)
NorthCrab (2023-04-01 13:05:24+00:00): Dzięki ! :-)
Tomas Straupis (2023-04-05 07:48:57+00:00): Kuriam realiai pastate yra Nord Security (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10763094153), nes dabar yra pažymėta pastate 16A, 16C yra 50m į pietryčius.
rbs_ (2023-04-05 10:41:55+00:00): Pagal faktą yra 16A (laiptinėj yra iškaba, 4 aukštas), bet pagal viešai randamus rekvizitus 16C. Tikriausiai dėl to, kad Nord Security priklauso Tesonet, kuris yra 16C. Tai manau reikėtų pakeisti į 16A, ką manai?
Tomas Straupis (2023-04-05 11:43:56+00:00): Taip, teisingai. Aš irgi manau, kad reikia pagal realią situaciją nurodyti. Jei žmogus (ar paštininkas) ieškos, tai turėtų eiti į 16A, o ne 16C.
NiedernhausenerJunge (2023-04-04 13:04:46+00:00): Hi,
I just wanted to mention that the route of the Magistrale for Europe between Karlsruhe and Stuttgart is not via Mannheim, but via Bruchsal.

Also even if you only include newly build infrastructure, the line between Vienna and Bratislava, which is currently upgraded to two tracks and electrified, should be included.
Nakaner (2023-04-04 14:17:10+00:00): Hi ,

in OpenStreetMap, we map existing features only. While TGV, ICE, TER routes etc. exist, this superroute is a artificial thing whose sole purpose is to get funds from the EU for railway projects. Therefore, I am in favour of deleting this relation. You are free to start a discussion on the OSM forum at https://community.openstreetmap.org/ if you disagree.

Best regards

Michael
AurélienQ (2023-04-04 14:49:53+00:00): Hi,
First, you are right for Bruschal. I found strange that trains had to maneuver.

Next, yes, I only include new infrastructure or highspeed infrastructure (normally, the Magistrale for Europe is only these types of ways). So that's what I did.
But for the Vienna-Bratislava section, I see the line, but the map say that's not a highspeed line (only ways with a max speed of 160km/h) . That's possible that I made a mistake. In this case, could you tell me your source ? Like that I'll can change the relation.

Thank's for your comment !
AurélienQ (2023-04-04 14:53:21+00:00): My comment was for NiedernhausenerJunge
AurélienQ (2023-04-04 15:06:53+00:00): Hi,
Maybe I put a wrong tag. I wanted to put the infrastructure way, like for railway line (that's what it is) with the tag route=railway, not like an hiking way (I'm not good in english, please forgive me the mistakes).
Of course, I know that's just a project for countries have more money, but the EU choosed a coordinator project, and other things who made of this project more than a financial solution (I think). For me this relation is like e-road for highways. Maybe I'm wrong. If it's not the tags who dont satisfy you, I will start a discussion, there is no problem.

Happy to discuss

La Voie
AurélienQ (2023-04-04 15:07:21+00:00): This one for Nakaner