piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
canfe (2023-11-26 16:33:07+00:00): Ma vicolo del castello è davvero così dritta? Dalle foto aeree sembrerebbe si curvi attorno all'edificio col tetto più scuro.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144382809
Langlaeufer (2023-11-23 21:46:27+00:00): Hallo 38446
Hier Steht das die Brücke auch für Radfahrer und Fußgänger gesperrt ist. https://www.strassenbau.niedersachsen.de/startseite/aktuelles/presseinformationen/l-517-prufergebnis-zeigt-massive-schaden-an-bramkebrucke-bei-schulenberg-227404.html

Oder ist das noch nicht umgesetzt?
Grüße Langläufer
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144382861
38446 (2023-11-24 05:15:11+00:00): Das weiß ich halt nicht. Beim Autoverkehr können wir uns auf die Meldung verlassen, denke ich; ob tatsächlich auch für Fußgänger gesperrt ist, würde ich lieber vor Ort überprüfen  - halte es für wahrscheinlicher dass man durchkommt
EdoBoo (2023-11-24 14:35:34+00:00): Ciao!
In primis benvenuto su OpenStreetMap.
Ho sistemato le ultime due vie che hai aggiunto, poiché le hai segnalate come strada secondaria, quando in realtà sono dei semplici vincoli.

P.s: se vuoi chiedere consigli e hai dubbi esiste un gruppo Telegram che raggruppa i mappatori della zona di Torino! Basta che cerchi "#OsmTO" sull'App (o sennò sul mio profilo  di OSM trovi tutte le info)
felipeeugenio (2025-08-25 14:49:10+00:00): Hola GUstavo. Los moteles parejeros son amenity=love_hotel.
El concepto de motel en Chile está mal usado.
saludos
GustavoE (2025-08-25 15:20:29+00:00): Entendido, gracias por la aclaración.
Mich-Mich (2026-01-25 09:00:16+00:00): Cette route est NON déneigée !
hoserab (2023-11-23 21:22:38+00:00): Hello Evpac,

It has been three days since I sent you a message and left a comment on your changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144254712, and you still haven't replied. I'm concerned that you're not aware that many of the changes you're  making are—from my own personal knowledge, being local to Calgary—blatantly incorrect. You made changes to 17th Avenue SW and Old Banff Coach Road which I know for a fact aren't true. I'm worried you don't realize you may be working off of outdated satellite photos and false info.

Please: respond to this comment. Barring a response from you I will otherwise refer your changes to the OSM Data Working Group, who may temporarily or permanently block you from contributing to OSM any further.
vojtechzaboril (2023-11-27 19:20:26+00:00): Ahoj,
myslím si že (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/977835778) by měla být označena jako trunk (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:highway%3Dtrunk), ale chápu že je to hodně krátký úsek
V
vojtechzaboril (2023-11-27 19:21:37+00:00): A ještě (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:%C4%8Cesko/Zna%C4%8Den%C3%AD_silnic)
AmyCupcake (2023-11-25 12:48:42+00:00): We do not map N roads with bicycle=yes as that is the implied value for these types of roads.
tyfi (2023-11-23 21:43:07+00:00): ref="MO O" was incorrectly set for some of these ways due to O being to the south of 160. Other ways were named "Northwest 60th Lane" which is another wrong tiger-ism
AmyCupcake (2023-11-25 12:50:30+00:00): There seems to be a software problem in your garmin device, N words are bicycle=yes by default, we suggest contacting garmin and telling them to issue a software fix for your device rather than editing the entirety of spain with a device specific fix.
AmyCupcake (2023-11-25 12:51:08+00:00): *N roads...oops that's a pretty extreme case of a mess up :|
AmyCupcake (2023-11-25 13:01:31+00:00): As they are a device specific fix, the tags are likely to end up deleted when people do map cleanups. Because it is the default value being explicitly reapplied, meaning if Spain were to change the law on cycling access, we'd have to manually fix it.
Kroter (2023-11-25 17:21:38+00:00): But I don't know if you are seeing that on this N634, and the others, the Spain's laws accept bicycles. I don't know if I explain it well. In the A8 is not accepted bicycles but in the N6XX the bicycle are legals.
AmyCupcake (2023-11-26 09:39:54+00:00): Yes, users of our data, like garmin, are generally expected to know our predetermined values and respect them, this avoids cluttering the map with device specific rules. I am honestly surprised a respected mapping provider like Garmin has this issue, but I feel you'd potentially have a better time by emailing garmin support than by inputting the default values on every road
Kroter (2023-11-26 09:48:26+00:00): Yes, I will fix the values I changed for the old ones to let the maps like before. Seems to be a problem in the configuration in my Garmin unit. Today I will let the map in the same way like before. Thanks.
Kroter (2023-11-26 17:43:47+00:00): And why AmyCupcake some N roads are classified as "yes" in the bicycle permission?.
For example N320 or N340. all of them are the same type of road. Same classified must have
AmyCupcake (2023-11-26 17:52:14+00:00): Thank you

as for your second comment, without knowing the exact way, I assume it is either an error similar to yours, or someone mapping a bike lane incorrectly
habi (2023-11-24 06:25:45+00:00): Ciao Piagno
Mersi fürs Hinzufügen hier.
Ist das ächt eine Filiale von denen, oder sind die nicht mehr im Monbijou bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6051935054 ?
Gruss, Habi
Piagno (2023-11-24 07:26:19+00:00): Ja das hat mich auch verwundert.
"Hier" ist es auf jeden Fall von aussen so angeschrieben. Auf der Website ist aber nur vom Monbijou die Rede.
habi (2023-11-24 13:58:46+00:00): Bin im Monbijou durch-🚲, dort sind die auch noch da, Eingang beleuchtet. Also evtl. neue Filiale.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-11-23 22:21:29+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11372231454

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2023-11-23 22:30:23+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11372204149
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11372204150

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
descubrebitcoin (2023-11-23 23:38:27+00:00): Estaban etiquetados como dos cajeros de operadores diferentes. ¿Ha podido verificar en persona que solamente existe uno de ellos en ese centro comercial? ¿A qué operador pertenece? Gracias.
MarinoBM (2023-11-24 10:25:19+00:00): He podido comprobar personalmente que sólo hay un cajero. Los he fusionado dejado las etiquetas que se corresponden a la descripción de BitBase-BitCoin que es la que figura en el cajero.  Shitcoins no lo pone por ningún sitio.
Supongo que se podrán agrupar las dos marcas en un único elemento.
Un saludo
descubrebitcoin (2023-11-25 00:29:00+00:00): Gracias por la aclaración. Si existe solamente el cajero de BitBase, entonces las etiquetas están correctas. Un saludo
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-11-23 22:31:18+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 69921279, 69921296, 69921387, 69921444.
SomeoneElse (2023-11-23 22:57:30+00:00): Some of this "redrawing" is likely incomplete.
ADAC Touristische InfoSysteme (2023-11-24 08:42:19+00:00): can you please revert your deletion. You deleted the label
ADAC Touristische InfoSysteme (2023-11-24 10:43:40+00:00): sorry, didn`t see https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/246671856
Fabrício (2023-12-03 19:58:12+00:00): I'm glad you agreed that the change was correct.
I questioned changeset 141428617, which removed population info made by you. Feel free to join the discussion there, as I am not sure my position is correct.
Filip009 (2023-11-26 21:06:15+00:00): Je to vôbec cyklochodník? Alebo sa jedná len o cyklopruh? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1214360861
opendcc (2023-11-24 05:29:05+00:00): siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144392756
Tommybara (2024-01-13 06:11:21+00:00): Tôi đã có ghi chú trong tóm lược sửa đổi rằng Đèo Prenn hiện không còn là một phần của QL.20, do vào năm 2016 Bộ đã có quyết định chuyển hướng tuyến QL.20 sang Đèo Mimosa và bàn giao Đèo Prenn về cho tỉnh Lâm Đồng quản lý.
Hufkratzer (2023-11-24 21:40:11+00:00): Hi,
The areas you have tagged leisure=horse_riding here are no riding centres, they are riding arenas or paddocks. Riding arenas are usually tagged leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian and in iD there is a preset that does that (in German: "Reitplatz").
The tag leisure=horse_riding is for complete riding centres and shall only be used once for every centre (because in reality this centre exits only once). Please compare the following information and example:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dhorse_riding

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/547296472
AiNikolas (2023-11-25 12:06:43+00:00): Hi and Hallo.
Thanx for the tipp-off. Correction as you layed it out already underway.
Hufkratzer (2023-11-25 19:54:53+00:00): Hi,
It seems to be the riding centre describeb on this webpage: 
https://www.visit-halkidiki.gr/portfolio-view/horseback-riding-school/
This is what could be tagged leisure=horse_riding
AiNikolas (2023-11-25 20:40:03+00:00): Hi Hufkratzer.
Thanx for the tip-off. The ippoliti horses (the website you indicated) is located where my false tagging occured. Fon number area code is correct (Agios Nikolaos). Postal code ist correct (Agios Nikolaos). Hamlet Ormos Panagias constitutes a part of Agios Nikolaos. So, your hints towards correction have already been applied, pending leisure=horse_riding for the complex as a whole.
Once again, thank you very much for your help.
Yours, AiNikolas.
Metzor (2023-11-25 13:46:08+00:00): Hallo der König!

Brouter suspects hat angeschlagen, weil eine deiner Einbahnstraßen die falsche Richtung hatte. Das war die hier: https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/154243397

Ich habe das mal geradegezogen und noch ein paar andere Sachen in der Gegend verbessert, falls du reinschauen willst:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144441340

Bzw: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=144441340#20/47.62341/8.20764

Schönes Wochenende
Metzor
ToniE (2023-11-25 12:21:01+00:00): Servus,

laut GTFS (H04, H33 und H41) sind die Liniennummer ohne Leerzeichen.

https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/gtfs/DE/routes.php?feed=DE-SPNV

Gruß
Toni
hybridOL (2023-11-26 14:25:15+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis, ich hatte mich an der erfassten Liste orientiert und die wenigen "falschen" Linien korrigiert. Dann war wohl die Mehrheit falsch. Wird korrigiert
Kovoschiz (2023-11-24 06:00:46+00:00): Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Use_description_instead_of_name_for_route_relations and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Buses#Bus_Route_Naming . This should not be done. 
Elsewhere eg London's River, they may even be unnamed. Staten Island Ferry doesn't need to say `=Whitehall - St George` either.
minghong (2023-11-24 06:17:08+00:00): I see that it is not applicable here:
1. The proposal is still in draft (under way) - no final conclusion yet.
2. The proposal is about route relations, not route ways.

The Transport Department names all the ferry routes in the Start - End fashion:
https://www.td.gov.hk/en/transport_in_hong_kong/public_transport/ferries/index.html

This naming is good as it is consistent and the routes don't need to be renamed due to a change of operator.
Kovoschiz (2023-11-24 15:43:42+00:00): 1. There is much consensus in Discourse. Plus applications eg Nominatm calling for this. 
2. What does that mean? Lines are the equivalent for `route=ferry` 
3. Why should the government be followed? They still don't resemble a name, more of a label that shouldn't be used. There are alternatives discussed. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Nadjita/Routes#New_tag_label=* 
4. This is arbitrary. The naming on `=bus` doesn't follow Schedule of Routes exactly either for "Urban Route" etc. Preventing change doesn't hold, as further renaming is avoided for eg North Point via Kai Tak or Kwun Tong first. Both rerouting and change of management doesn't happen frequently anyway. This argument is not used on bus and trains either. 
Coral Sea Ferry is the common name here. It shouldn't be obstructed by redundant info in `from=` and `to=` .
felipeeugenio (2023-11-26 19:43:09+00:00): Hola Camilo. Además de cambiar la calle borraste una notaría. Ya no existe?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144388980
Juan © Sepulveda ® (2023-11-27 19:42:56+00:00): Hola. Correcto. Se cambió de lugar a calle Lautaro. No quise agregar la posición nueva porque no tengo la numeración exacta. Estoy esperando próximo viaje para anotarlo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144388980
felipeeugenio (2023-11-27 19:52:13+00:00): Ok. Gracias
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-11-29 07:53:13+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/19356800/history

Is it road with sign looking like this: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/images/7/7b/Harbor_view_drive-do_not_enter.jpg ?
ZeLonewolf (2023-11-29 10:00:59+00:00): I reverted this change because these streets are posted as private access roads.  Please do not change them back without community discussion.  Ref/ DWG ticket #2023112810000241

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144581288
ZeLonewolf (2023-11-26 00:38:19+00:00): Path is incorrect for a road that cars drive on.  This should either be highway=track or highway=service as it's access to the parking lot to the south.
ZeLonewolf (2023-11-26 00:30:50+00:00): I've reverted this change.  access=permissive is wrong for roads in a fenced-off condemned area.  Please do not change this tag unless this area is re-surveyed.
ZeLonewolf (2023-11-26 00:30:59+00:00): I've reverted this change.  access=permissive is wrong for roads in a fenced-off condemned area.  Please do not change this tag unless this area is re-surveyed.
ZeLonewolf (2023-11-25 23:54:56+00:00): Hi,

1. Please do not change private gated roads to access=permissive.  A gated road is clearly private.
2. Please do not change private roads to highway=track.  highway=track is intended for land access roads, not for residential roads for access to houses.
ZeLonewolf (2023-11-25 23:55:37+00:00): Also, please use descriptive comments.  "Updated based on actual road" does not say anything.  If you surveyed it (personally saw it with your eyes) please say so, otherwise describe why you're making the change.
felipeeugenio (2023-11-26 19:43:54+00:00): Hola Por favor cuidar la ortografía cuando agrega nombres. gracias
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144389318
felipeeugenio (2023-11-26 20:22:09+00:00): Otro tema: cual es la fuente que usa para estos nombres de calles?
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144389318
[at]AJYTO (2023-12-02 17:43:01+00:00): Tolong klarifikasinya, ini Bulevar Raya susah terhubung dengan Rancanumpang sejak dibuka KCIC kenapa diputus lagi ya?

Apakah ini sesuai dengan kondisi sebenarnya? Atau hanya berdasarkan foto satelit saja?
GrabID_AdninWidyaR (2023-12-07 04:16:37+00:00): Halo [at]AJYTO. Terima kasih atas tanggapan dan masukannya. Sebelumnya saya memutus jalan tersebut berdasarkan laporan lapangan pada November 2023, tetapi tampaknya jalan tersebut sekarang sudah dapat dilalui, dan saya akan mengembalikan jalan tersebut seperti sediakala. Sekali lagi terima kasih atas masukannya. Happy Mapping!
EvanSiroky (2023-11-29 05:33:10+00:00): Hey there! I'm a local mapper from Scotts Valley, California. I see that you requested a review of this changeset, so I'm giving it a review.

This review is mainly about all of the awesome foot paths that you've added. These have been added in high detail which is great! The only area for improvement could be to make sure that the paths are connected thoroughly to the rest of the street/pedestrian network. This will help trip planners be able to plan walking trips properly with not only the paths within the school but also outside of the school too.

In particular, the "Back Entrance Walkable Pathway" could be extended to meet the nearby sidewalk. But then it would be also good for the intersection at Arizona & Midwick to have some crosswalks added too. That way, a walking trip along Midwick to the school would properly utilize the crosswalk, then the back entrance pathway.
Aleks-Berlin (2023-11-25 08:54:42+00:00): Hi OSM09WVL,
please do not create problematic tags!
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/reports/characters_in_keys#problem
Thanks, A.
user_5359 (2023-11-26 08:00:23+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I remove your SEO SPAM (mostly foreign keys). Please read https://wiki.osm.org for a better description of you business or ask for help.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-11-25 00:05:17+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144425097
Fizzie-DWG (2023-11-25 01:38:18+00:00): All available references, together with local knowledge, say that this trail is currently open to the public, so deletion was reverted.
MxxCon (2023-11-25 20:08:39+00:00): Hello.
Do you have more information about these stores such as their address/phone#/hours?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144390576
tyfi (2023-11-24 21:52:54+00:00): This changeset adds ref tag to the way because I forgot it
Hungerburg (2023-11-24 11:27:11+00:00): Hallo Thales, das ist wohl eher ein Wohnhaus und nicht eine Zimmervermietung?
Nakaner-repair (2023-11-29 10:34:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 144582368 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets uploaded using Organic Maps because I have doubt about their quality.
MxxCon (2023-11-25 20:14:29+00:00): Hello.
Please note that when a business occupies only a part of a building, such a restaurant on the ground floor, it must be mapped as a separate node, not as a whole building.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144393792
λnko (2023-11-24 06:22:24+00:00): This place is something I heard from my friends. There are indeed many places in Taian that need to update their path data. I hope those who have left this message can support the update of Taian's path data. Thanks for your support.
MxxCon (2023-11-25 20:17:31+00:00): It seems like you damaged flower shop tags in this edit?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144393928
citrula (2023-11-24 21:30:33+00:00): The end of street names should not be abbreviated. Also, not sure if I understand what the addr:block tag is meant to convey.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144394258
citrula (2023-11-24 21:20:38+00:00): Welcome to OSM! On OSM, phone numbers should include the international country code like so:
+1 972 599 0865
or
+1 972-599-0865

Happy mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144394306
phoenixsaigon1698 (2024-03-07 04:07:04+00:00): Linh ơi, sau đường nào oneway:motorcar = yes. Anh có thể khuyến nghị là oneway=yes và oneway:motorcycle = no nhé. Tại vì oneway=yes sẽ có hướng mũi tên rõ ràng cho xe hơi. oneway:motorcycle = no vẫn sẽ giúp xe máy đi được 2 chiều.
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-17 02:27:53+00:00): Thank you for mapping. The mapping looks great and also the changeset comment. Happy Mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144395161
mcliquid (2023-11-24 08:15:58+00:00): Hi,

just a general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
arjunaraoc (2024-01-07 10:53:23+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).

Check my improvements: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145985599
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144395673
Kogacarlo (2023-11-26 06:42:17+00:00): Yo, moet deze weg: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1226403231#map=18/51.88155/5.26831 niet fence zijn? Voor een poort is hij nogal lang.
Kogacarlo (2023-11-26 07:05:36+00:00): Ik heb het alvast aangepast.
JJJWegdam (2023-11-26 12:51:49+00:00): Dat klopt
yzal (2023-11-24 14:35:02+00:00): Dobrý deň, tourism=alpine_hut je horská chata https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:tourism%3Dalpine_hut čo asi nebude správne.

Pre názov chata viac pasuje tourism=chalet https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:tourism%3Dchalet ale pri tom sa jedná o prenájom celej budovy - chatky.

Toto podľa veľkosti vyzerá že tam bude viacej izieb takže asi penzión https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:tourism%3Dguest_house Ale je som tam nebol tak je to na zváženie.
mapperue (2024-01-03 06:02:18+00:00): Dobrý deň, prečo nereagujete na otázky k úprave?
miron70 (2024-01-03 10:49:21+00:00): Bol som tam naposledy niekedy v lete a rozpravala sa majitelmi. 
Je to chata, kde kedysi poskytovali ubytovanie aj stravu.  Teraz tam vraj byvaju majitelia a sem tam to aj prenajmu.
Mozem to preklasifikovat na chalet.
Famlam (2023-11-24 10:05:28+00:00): Hoi Jaap,

Ik vrees dat ik deze changeset zal moeten terugdraaien. Die bruggetjes etc. zijn pas in de zomer aangelegd, de situatie die jij erin hebt getekend lijkt overeen te komen met de winterfoto's van begin 2023. Daarna is de weg en de paadjes nog opgeschoven.
Famlam (2023-11-24 10:06:19+00:00): Ik wacht even een dagje op je reactie voor ik het daadwerkelijk terugdraai :)
jaap de vries (2023-11-28 13:41:23+00:00): Afgelopen week hier wat bekeken vanwege de vraag van Erik.
Bruggetje heb ik niet er ingezet, die heb je zelf gedaan, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1193013330/history 
Andere paden die hier niet meer waren aangepast. O.a. die van Liander https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1189846105/history
jaap de vries (2023-11-28 13:42:30+00:00): Andere paden heb jij ook er in gezet en heb ik niet aangepast https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1186316848
Famlam (2023-11-28 17:08:37+00:00): Hoi Jaap, ik had het vanzelfsprekend alleen over de actief gewijzigde paden in deze changeset. Weg 1193013333 bijvoorbeeld. Vergelijk het maar met satellietdataportaal (van september, niet die schemerfoto waarop je niks ziet). Of rondom de verplaatste node 7082553464, waar de straat nu over gras loopt.

Maar ik fiets morgen wel even langs, controleer dan alle punten even (inclusief het kronkelpaadje way 1174855979 en Lianders elektriciteitskast).
Famlam (2023-11-29 16:10:09+00:00): Dag Jaap, ik heb deze wijzigingenset teruggedraaid. Alle verwijderde of gewijzigde elementen bleken nog te bestaan. (Wel heb ik de kronkels van pad 1174855979 iets verbeterd t.o.v. mijn eerste versie)

Foto's:
Kronkelpad way 1174855979 : https://ibb.co/LY9hYkv
Lianderhuisje (way 1189846105): https://ibb.co/M1XFMs4
Kronkelpad met bruggetjes (o.a. way 1193013336) : https://ibb.co/pwcBss6

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144594735