piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
RaccoonFederation (2024-03-01 11:09:50+00:00): Have you confirmed that these venues display some sort of LGBTQ branding or message? Or is this a bulk edit based on your own beliefs about the terminology that should be used?
jan-leila (2024-03-01 17:18:47+00:00): The gay tag and the lgbtq tag have the exact same semantic meaning, the gay tag however is substantially less frequently used, and is declining in usage

things that mean the same thing should be tagged the same way.

in addition a large chunk of these venues were double tagged as both gay and lgbtq which is just the same information twice

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lgbtq
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:gay
yasslay (2024-03-01 17:54:30+00:00): Personally, I think that this mechanical edit was a good and bold one and should not be reverted. The reasoning jan-leila gave perfectly justifies the mechanical edit. However, some editors need to stop spamming changesets with "keep it local" without good cause to do so, i.e. mechanical edits that edit a couple of objects across different continents. That's to do with geographical size. This is to do with the mechanical edits of conduct.

Thank you,
Yasslay
mcliquid (2024-03-01 18:07:22+00:00): Whether a mechanical edit is justified must be determined in a community discussion. The discussion must be linked in the changeset. If this is not the case, I will not stop pointing it out. With the request for understanding and best regards,
mcliquid
ablevi202 (2024-03-02 08:39:12+00:00): Hi, feel I should step in and clarify this isn't a mechanical edit, it was all manual. This was stated in the other changeset.
yasslay (2024-03-02 11:16:13+00:00): Thank you. I stand by my assessment that this was a good edit and shouldn’t be reverted. The global spanning changeset is justifiable imo though it could be split up into smaller ones if it’s that big of an issue.
Armando Hasanbelliu (2024-03-26 22:09:06+00:00): Next time try to do smaller area or within a region changes.
the lgbtqrstuvwxyz is non inclusive to the straight group, so I find it useless to do add that kind of tag.
ablevi202 (2024-03-26 22:15:03+00:00): its fine to have a changeset this large for massive tag changes and tbh if youre as stupid as you would need to be to think that queer should include non queer people, none of your opinions matter. also plenty of queer people are straight, which is a degree of basic nuance you're clearly incapable of Armando.
ablevi202 (2024-04-06 23:08:05+00:00): live armando reaction

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j5a0W0UqIPk
ablevi202 (2024-04-07 00:06:26+00:00): oh my god im so sorry, that was the wrong link. i meant to send this one 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2UJ_a7mxGpM
SomeoneElse (2024-04-07 10:21:09+00:00): I've hidden some of the stupider comments here - they are neither helpful nor relevant.
- Andy (from the DWG)
Armando Hasanbelliu (2024-04-08 20:20:24+00:00): ofc mine aren't helpful and relevant, while you admin let that other person's very useful and relevant comments for the community. 👏👏👏
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-04-08 22:29:49+00:00): gonna cry?
OddlyAngled (2024-03-01 03:52:01+00:00): thanks for working on features out here, lots of tracks and streams can use a lot of work still!

be aware that Bing has gotten better over the last few years but still has issues on the steeper slopes. at some point there will be LIDAR coverage and we can have excellent alignment once and for all. but until then it’s not a bad idea to use a couple sources, a gps survey, or Strava to cross check. sometimes Bing can be off by many meters. and very occasionally by 50 meters or more.

one thing that would help us review these changes is to include a brief summary of the edits you are making- something like “making track adjustments to Bear Diversion” would be great. otherwise we have to figure it out entirely by looking at a diff.

thanks again!
mcliquid (2024-03-01 08:16:01+00:00): Hi,

please note: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-01 19:49:54+00:00): Have you discussed this bot edit with community?

Have you considered that this edit may remove info that some object is specifically gay-focused?

Are you aware of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct ?
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-01 19:51:55+00:00): may apply also to https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148075216
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-02 02:26:39+00:00): now send also PM
jan-leila (2024-03-02 02:30:11+00:00): This was not a bot edit this was done slowly and manually over a few hours
jan-leila (2024-03-02 02:31:49+00:00): > Have you considered that this edit may remove info that some object is specifically gay-focused

If something was tagged as specifically for gay men that was preserved under the lgbtq tags. There was no loss of information
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-02 03:47:23+00:00): note that if `amenity=bar gay=yes` ended being retagged to `amenity=bar lgbtq=yes` then some information was lost.

I opened https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/gay-yes-replaced-by-lgbtq/109964 as I lack knowledge on this specific topic and if it was a manual edit then it does not qualify for revert as a bot edit
archpdx (2024-03-01 03:12:09+00:00): In OSM, we only map current features, not places from 1956. If you're interested in mapping historical places like these, I recommend taking a look at https://openhistoricalmap.org/
archpdx (2024-03-01 03:15:01+00:00): Just because it doesn't exist on USGS doesn't mean this isn't a real place name.  West Hazel Dell is one of the neighborhood associations in Clark County, all of which were imported from CCGIS.
8329 (2024-03-01 04:05:21+00:00): Sure, but Vancouver junction exists on it and is not there.
felipeeugenio (2024-03-01 11:56:54+00:00): Hola. Gracias por sus ediciones. 

Veo que borró un semaforo que en verdad no existe en Pablo Neruda con ICPinto.
Pero lo que si hay es un ceda el paso (highway=give_way + direction=*)

Saludos
santamariense (2026-03-03 12:23:48+00:00): Olá joaoliberati,

Que bom que você fez algumas contribuições ao OSM. Considere continuar/retormar pois todas edições são importantes, contudo, atente para não inserir informações erradas ao mapa, como o seu nome e de outra pessoa nas ruas.

Bons mapeamentos,

santamariense
Frans S (2024-03-03 11:27:00+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Inaccurate  mapped.
Oversized (added yard in your mapping)
No buildings squared


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148076470
Frans S (2024-03-04 09:32:49+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
inaccurate mapped. (1 building with just 3 nodes)
Buildings not squared

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148076628
Frans S (2024-03-04 09:42:35+00:00): Hello Thanks for mapping
Please take a look to this video how to create a round building
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CX4T6uOi7HE
Frans S (2024-03-04 09:43:17+00:00): You overlooked quite a lot of buildings.
Best regards and keep mapping
fortera_au (2024-03-01 01:43:21+00:00): Hey, I don't believe these are actually speed cameras, and are just Safe-T-Cam cameras, do you know if these have changed recently (last couple of months)? If they're Safe-T-Cam cameras, they don't do rego checks or speed, and there's a certain way to tag them listed on the OSM Wiki.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148077272
HamRMac (2024-03-01 03:06:29+00:00): I read that they are part of the Safe-T-Cam camera systems. From: https://www.speedcameras.sa.gov.au/about_speed_and_red_light_cameras, "Safe-T-Cam cameras are on major arterial roads and detect heavy vehicle driver fatigue and all unregistered vehicles". It does appear that they perform registration checks on all vehicles. I couldn't find any enforcement for registration on the wiki so I tagged it as enforcement=registration. The fatigue checks is less descriptive but I read online it is able to check how long a hsv has been driving for and if it exceeds a certain amount of time they get fined. Again, I couldn't really find an enforcement value that is a maximum driving time so I marked as speed_camera (but importantly only for HSV vehicles). I also can't find a generic traffic camera node on the OSM wiki that isn't speed_camera. If there is a better way of marking them feel free to update it.
fortera_au (2024-03-01 03:50:11+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Roads#Heavy_Vehicle_Enforcement has the section on tagging the Safe-T-Cam cameras, and I didn't know about them checking registrations so thanks for that link!
HamRMac (2024-03-01 04:01:37+00:00): Fixed the enforcement in changeset 148079512. Thanks for that link!
ablevi202 (2024-03-01 01:50:12+00:00): apologies for the changeset size, i clicked the button to upload each change individually in josm, but i clearly messed it up somehow
willkmis (2024-03-01 17:34:04+00:00): Hi, can you link to the county assessor map you're using to justify this change? I previously removed the directional prefix from the roads you changed here west of Sawtelle (in this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128061187). My reasoning was that the "West" prefix isn't on the street signs in Culver City or Venice/Marina del Rey. In fact, these areas don't appear to use any directional prefixes at all in their addresses/street names as far as I can tell. So I think just "Washington Boulevard" is the more correct name in these areas. I think adding the prefix east of La Cienega is a good change though.

Thanks!
Will
crushtheserpent (2024-03-01 19:58:07+00:00): https://maps.assessor.lacounty.gov/m/ That's the website I use. You can click around to bring up each lot's details in the sidebar. Washington east of Fairfax/Culver City limits definitely should use the prefix to differentiate from East Washington addresses. The west prefix reappears in the addresses of lots (seems like most, but not all lots) west of Sawtelle to Del Rey/Culver City limits. I would caution against depending on street signs because I've found errors (e.g., misspellings, using the wrong suffix, etc.) on street signs and I use that county assessor website as my reference point.

As for Washington Blvd. west of Del Rey, you're right. That part doesn't use the same grid numbering system as the rest of Washington Boulevard, so I'll remove the prefix. I have no idea how I missed that.

Best,
CTS
willkmis (2024-03-01 23:14:55+00:00): Thanks for the info and the link. That's pretty interesting about the addresses being a mix of including and omitting the West prefix in between Sawtelle and Lincoln. My understanding was that Culver City didn't have any directional prefixes at all for streets within its limits. That's why similar streets like Sepulveda and Jefferson drop their prefixes when they cross from LA into Culver. But even Culver City's own interactive parcel map seems to have a mishmash of prefixed and non-prefixed addresses along Washington (which I hope/assume match those in the LA County one)! https://gisproxy.culvercity.org/Html5Viewer/index.html?viewer=ExternalInfo.ExternalInfo.

It kind of seems like no one really knows the actual street name here for sure haha. Maybe that's unsurprising, as Washington threads a strange needle of Culver City's borders where parts of some of the adjoining lots are actually partly in the city of LA. With that in mind, I would tend to favor the signage on the ground, which omits the "West", and is more consistent with the other major streets in Culver City limits. But based on this info I no longer feel terribly strongly about it either way. 

Thanks for looking into it, and for fixing the westernmost portion, which as you said definitely follows the Venice addressing system starting at zero from the beach and thus has no West prefix.

Best,
Will
Igor Bubelov (2024-03-01 03:55:39+00:00): Hi!

Is it a real place? Is it an exchange booth or an ATM?
OBOCASH (2024-03-01 05:13:59+00:00): Hello, Yes. It is an ATM. Any Krungsri(yellow) ATM can be used to withdraw exchanged cash with a cash code.
Igor Bubelov (2024-03-01 08:23:13+00:00): I see, two notes:

1. Using URLs in name tags will get your places deleted, since other editors will think those are webistes/spam. Something like "OBO Cash" would look more normal. There is a "website" tag which can be filled with the actual URL

2. It's better to change the feature type to ATM since those are real ATMs and not some manned currency exchange counters
OBOCASH (2024-03-01 09:02:16+00:00): Thank you. I made corrections.
tastrax (2024-03-01 10:18:02+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
mini-me (2024-03-01 07:47:09+00:00): Слева к6 с5, справа к6 с3. Ну явно же тут не может быть к5. Откуда вы взяли этот адрес?
Soshal Distan Singh (2024-03-02 03:19:37+00:00): Видимо, из яндекса, как и здесь: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/914339173
Supaplex (2024-05-29 03:54:24+00:00): Revert due to it is a fake bus station

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151969677
felipeeugenio (2024-03-01 11:50:51+00:00): Hola.
No creo que haya scrubs ahi. quizas lo que hay es shubbery- puede ser? (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dshrubbery)
literan (2024-03-01 09:49:04+00:00): тег barrier=fence на точках не ставится https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dfence
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-05 08:36:01+00:00): Hello! Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1256425997 ?
hertipau (2025-12-15 16:36:41+00:00): fixed it
literan (2024-03-01 09:44:18+00:00): не следует вставлять слово "строительство" в тег name при описании стройплощадок; ознакомьтесь с вики: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:landuse%3Dconstruction#%D0%94%D0%BE%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B5%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%BD%D1%8B%D0%B5_%D1%82%D0%B5%D0%B3%D0%B8
Herman Lee (2024-03-01 07:50:59+00:00): 请文明用语，感谢
Mb_651 (2024-07-09 21:20:39+00:00): Hey, route=ferry is most definitely wrong. If at all, your snorkeling and canoe ways should be tagged with route=canoe
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-07-29 18:28:35+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11680759507/history has fixme:type = building that was added in this edit
Is it an attempt to map a building not present in OSM data? Is it an attempt to add address info to an already mapped building? Something else?

See https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/21o2 for more objects with this problem
cs09736 (2024-03-05 04:17:11+00:00): Hi there,
Be careful with the surface colour tags. It should by `surface:colour=*` instead of `surface_colour=*`.
I can go through and update them now.
Cheers
cs09736 (2024-03-05 05:08:40+00:00): see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148232690
citrula (2024-03-01 07:34:21+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Thanks for your contributions. You can see the new building on the "Esri World" imagery layer.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148080419
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-12-22 15:59:02+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11680839428/history has shop = tteok that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
shop=tteok ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop or https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Tag_descriptions_for_key_%22shop%22 fitting? Maybe new value needs to be invented? Maybe this data is wrong and there is no shop here? Maybe it is not a shop but something else?
MxxCon (2024-03-07 00:48:21+00:00): Map vandalism reverted.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148319733
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-08 18:33:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 148396825 where the changeset comment is: weitere leidige edits unerwünschter Sockenpuppen entfernt s. https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Global_ban_of_user_geocodec
nevw (2024-03-01 07:20:55+00:00): Hi, the editor you have used has noted a few errors as listed in the boxes directly above this text.
The main warning is "warnings:crossing_ways:highway-highway" of which there are 11 instances.
Where one track/path/footway (called a type of highway in osm) crosses another you need to put a node at that point to join the two where they cross.
If a way crosses a stream you normally add a ford to the crossing point if you cross through the water. If there is a culvert or pipe with the way passing above it then you would not join the two but instead split the small section of the waterway and add a culvert. If a bridge takes you above the waterway you split the way you cycle or walk over at each end of the bridge and add a bridge tag to that section.
I am not sure of the details of the impossible one way but it means you can't leave that section with out traveling against the one way direction.
This one likely has occurred where you have not joined end of the way to the one it should connect to. You may need to double click to join lines in the iD editor but I am not very familiar with iD.
Nearby0051 (2024-03-01 21:18:52+00:00): Moin,
um was handelt es sich hierbei?
Online konnte ich zu "muveum Rellingen" nichts finden
yelisey90 (2024-03-01 07:45:31+00:00): Hi! Do you know that tracktype is relevant for residential (and all other) roads? A residential road can be unpaved (for example gravel => grade2), and I wouldn't be surprised to see a ground road (grade3) in a village turned part of a city.
xkillah (2024-03-01 08:58:15+00:00): Hi, yes, but it's kinda exceptional case because in heavily populated areas residential roads are maintained and easily passable in general. Reason for this change was that many of those tracktype tags are just outdated. I looked through many of the modified roads in this area by Esri images and they are asphalted.
yelisey90 (2024-03-01 22:06:55+00:00): Ok, I agree with your reasoning ;)
OSM_RogerWilco (2024-03-01 09:48:40+00:00): Hi mapperue,

why sells instead of produce? Take a look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dfarm and https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/shop=farm#combinations .

Regards
Roger Wilco
mapperue (2024-03-01 10:30:44+00:00): Hi, you are right. I reverted this changeset.
Soshal Distan Singh (2024-03-02 02:27:28+00:00): Добрый день. Не забывайте про пробелы в номерах домов. Пожалуйста, изучите: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Адреса#Нумерация_домов
phoenixsaigon1698 (2024-03-06 02:13:50+00:00): Ngân ơi, chịu khó khi edit xong Ngân coi lại xem các member của 17073190 nó nối liền mạch với nhau chưa á. Cám ơn Ngân nhiều.
phoenixsaigon1698 (2024-03-06 02:41:38+00:00): Đã sửa các relation này rồi nhé.
VLD549 (2024-03-30 08:04:43+00:00): Hi, shouldn't the name be Arbane Cocktail Bar, as per the site?

Thank you.
tordans (2024-03-14 15:10:22+00:00): Hallo Accoda, ihr habt in euren Changesets das "review_requested	yes" aktiv. Aber nach über 1000 Änderungen dürfte ja genug Erfahrung da sein, um den Haken zu entfernen, oder? Oder gibt es eine konkrete Frage, mit der wir weiter helfen können? Viele Grüße und frohes Mappen
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148085319
marc__marc (2024-10-01 21:00:10+00:00): Bonjour,
Merci pour l'amélioration des données.
n'hésites pas à couper le batiment en 4 pour renseigner chaque maison séparément.
Je l'aurais bien fait mais en regardant l'imagerie sat, je trouve la forme telement étrange que j'ai du mal à couper, sauf à faire 4 morceaux +- de même largeur
Cordialement,
Marc
marczoutendijk (2024-03-01 20:13:29+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15760
Mammi71 (2024-08-09 05:13:46+00:00): Hallo Niederpruem, Du hast diesem Parkplatz (und weiteren) einen Namen gegeben. Warum? Woher hast Du den Namen? Hier stehen weit und breit keine Namen an den Parkplätzen.
Außerdem hat dieser Parkplatz angeblich eine Hausnummer. Die Hausnummer 42 gehört aber zu einem Haus südlich des Parkplatzes.
Niederpruem (2024-08-09 16:15:18+00:00): Hallo Mammi71,

auf der offiziellen Webseite von Zingst (www.zingst.de) stehen viele Parkplätze, die einen Namen haben. 
Die Parkplätze am Strand heißen häufig nach ihren Strandübergängen, siehe z.B.
https://www.zingst.de/parkplatz-stranduebergang-32
Die Parkplätze haben eine Hausnummer, damit man sie besser mit dem Auto-Navi finden kann.
Wie ich gerade sehe, hat dieser Parkplatz Strandübergang 32 keine Hausnummer.
Niederpruem (2024-08-09 16:22:18+00:00): Sorry, Parkplatz Strandübergang 27 hat die Adresse Am Bahndamm 42.

Diese Adresse habe ich von folgender Webseite:
https://www.zingst.de/parkplatz-stranduebergang-27

Du hast Recht, diese Adresse ist schon vergeben. Aber so steht es auf der offiziellen Seite von Zingst.
Mammi71 (2024-08-09 21:14:10+00:00): Hallo Niederpruem,
das ist leider in mehrfacher Hinsicht falsch:
- zingst.de ist die Webseite der Kur- und Tourismus GmbH Zingst, nicht die offizielle Webseite der Gemeinde Zingst (gemeinde-zingst.de)
- die Webseite unterliegt dem Urheberrecht. Informationen dieser Webseite dürfen nicht für Eintragungen in OSM verwendet werden, es sei denn, Dir liegt eine ausdrückliche Genehmigung vor.
- die vermeintlichen Namen sind eine reine textliche Beschreibung, um die verschiedenen Parkplätze auf der Webseite unterscheiden zu können. 
- OSM ist dagegen eine Geodatenbank und die Parkplätze sind mit amenity=parking hinreichend beschrieben. Die Nähe zum nächsten Übergang zum Strand ergibt sich aus den geografischen Koordinaten. Vor Ort gibt es einen solchen "Namen" nicht.
- Parkplätze haben keine Hausnummern, schon gar nicht bereits anderweitig vergeben Hausnummern. Das ist eine reine Hilfestellung für rein textbasierte Navi-Eingaben, hat aber in OSM nichts zu suchen. 

Gerade die Adressangaben sind teilweise Humbug: Weder addr:street=Übergang 30 noch addr:street=An der L21 sind gültige Adressangaben, sondern reine Beschreibungen.
Niederpruem (2024-08-10 08:14:21+00:00): Alles klar. Macht so, wie Ihr möchtet. Ich wollte nur helfen.