piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
zluuzki (2023-03-29 17:51:44+00:00): I assume you mean those ways avoiding multipolygons? 
I don't think it's a good idea to just simply delete them entirely - I properly fixed it by converting them to multipolygons.
Didn't took long using JOSM's "connect overlapping areas" tool.
user_5359 (2023-03-24 12:57:22+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I remove your SEO SPAM!
arvdk (2023-03-28 07:12:01+00:00): HI Mapping Dutchman,
Waarom voeg je tags toe als access=no+motor_vehicle=yes,
en oneway=yes op de roundabout?
Dit zijn overbodige tags, dus ik zal ze weer verwijderen voor je.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=134063094
zluuzki (2023-03-28 15:35:11+00:00): What exactly have you "cleaned up" here?
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-03-29 02:01:47+00:00): https://osmcha.org/changesets/134063455/
zluuzki (2023-03-29 17:54:03+00:00): I saw this already, and there, it looks like you just deleted some random nodes and thus lowered the quality
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-03-30 04:13:52+00:00): Charitability doesn't seem to be your  strong suit.
zluuzki (2023-03-30 07:49:32+00:00): No idea what you're talking about
zluuzki (2023-04-03 15:29:36+00:00): I still don't understand the "cleanup" you've done here
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-04-03 15:37:03+00:00): ok
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-04-03 16:18:25+00:00): https://imgur.com/a/N1q7IZg
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134063455
zluuzki (2023-04-03 17:46:14+00:00): Ok.
And why did you remove so many random nodes from ways?
zluuzki (2023-04-20 19:10:22+00:00): Because your'e obviously unable or unwilling to explain why you deleted those nodes, I reverted those deletions.

(hw=service->path etc. remains unchanged)
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-04-20 21:35:54+00:00): What is this obsession with unnecessary overcomplication.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-04 12:38:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134494165 where the changeset comment is: Reverting vandalism - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7021
Strubbl (2023-03-24 14:18:24+00:00): Hi Habetom,
du hast hier einen zweiten Node erstellt, wo du den ersten verdoppelt hast. Kannst du die beiden zusammenführen und deinen neuen Node wieder löschen?
Warum hast du ein Sonderzeichen in den Namen eingefügt?

Viele Grüße
user_18789252 (2023-03-24 14:24:44+00:00): Hallo Strubbl! 2 Node kann ich nicht machen..Der Name Wietstocker ∆ Weitblick ist ein geschützter Eigenname ! mfg Tom
Strubbl (2023-03-24 14:29:31+00:00): Wie spricht man denn das Symbol ∆ zwischen den Worten aus?
user_18789252 (2023-03-24 14:34:10+00:00): Garnicht ,wie das Komma auch
Strubbl (2023-03-24 14:34:40+00:00): Ich sehe kein Komma
Strubbl (2023-03-24 14:34:59+00:00): Ich habe den doppelte Node entfernt mit CS https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/134071207
user_18789252 (2023-03-24 14:41:31+00:00): Garnicht  ,  wie das Komma
user_5359 (2023-03-24 12:30:35+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I remove your SEO SPAM.
nw520 (2023-06-18 00:17:18+00:00): Hallo jemareu, kann es sein, dass sich der Master https://osm.org/relation/15637120 mit https://osm.org/relation/13876941 doppelt?
SekeRob (2023-03-25 18:55:14+00:00): Hi,

You tagged this as highway=track and the invalid hiughway=unclassified. Please choose which it is, track or unclassified and move that value to the highway= key, then delete hiughway.

cheers.
SekeRob (2023-03-25 18:56:26+00:00): PS The object needing correction is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1156940726
eggie (2023-03-24 12:20:37+00:00): Dag Erik  Je vraagt feedback..  Lijkt me oke zo.
MVG
eggie
Tomas Straupis (2023-03-24 13:26:32+00:00): This is not a picnic site. Please do not edit without any local knowledge.
eggie (2023-03-24 12:58:38+00:00): 
Erik
motorcar=no ..default.. hoeft eigenlijk niet.. maar bv wel moped mofa en hier dus motorcycle=yes
Gr eggie
eggie (2023-03-24 13:40:13+00:00): Maar ik weet niet welke bebording hier staat. Up to you.
user_18773037 (2023-03-24 14:17:05+00:00): Er staan geen borden.
Het paaltje verhinderd dat het pad als doorgaande weg wordt gebruikt.
Voetgangerszone, m.u.v. de bewoners.
eggie (2023-03-24 14:25:28+00:00): Ahhh oke.. onduidelijk dus.. 
Even gespiekt... Denk dat iedereen er mag komen. Voor brandgangen is dat dan weer anders. 
Maar wanneer het eigen weg is dan is bicycle=permissive wel juist.

gr eggie
4004 (2023-03-25 22:23:18+00:00): hi Vadzim, thanks for the edit. Are you sure it's a dumpster (ie it's taken to landfill), and not a recycling container?
BelarusVadzim (2023-03-29 08:35:07+00:00): Oh yeah I'm sure. :) I don't know how to share an image in this chat. Could you try this link, please: http_s://photos.app.goo.gl/5R3KPXNBtabPuSVv9
4004 (2023-03-29 09:24:49+00:00): Ah right, that’s quite a sight, certainly a dumpster. Дзякуй!
G4rden3r (2023-03-31 11:03:44+00:00): Moin, ich habe deine Änderung (Löschung des Gebäudes) rückgängig gemacht, da der lifecycle-prefix hier besser geeignet ist. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix
Luzandro (2023-03-27 17:16:53+00:00): Hallo Walter,

bist du dir sicher, dass dieser Abschnitt mittlerweile asphaltiert ist?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30570122/history

bin da erst vor einigen Wochen gelaufen und von einem Auto vollgespritzt worden, dass durch die Löcher gerumpelt ist

nach meiner Erinnerung beginnt der Asphalt ab hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28704773 
bin überrascht, dass ich für diesen Teil selbst noch vor einigen Monaten fine_gravel angegeben habe, das war glaube ich eh "schon immer" befestigt
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134065931
WaWei (2023-03-30 15:30:34+00:00): Hallo Andreas,
du hast recht. Ich bin vor Kurzem mit dem Rad - von Schranawand kommend - bei der spitzen Abzweigung abgebogen und auf Asphalt "gestoßen". Zuhause war wohl der Wunsch Vater des Gedankens und habe irrtümlich den Asphalt bis zur Landesstraße eingetragen.
Hab's auf fine_gravel korrigiert.
LG Walter
SekeRob (2023-03-25 15:05:45+00:00): Hi,

Apart from Bing having an image offset problem, you broke Bus z121 route at this roundabout. Please be careful to check that all relations remain intact where cutting and moving roundabout parts around in particular.

Thanks
Vera_D (2023-03-27 07:31:46+00:00): Hello SekeRob!

Thanks for your comment with explanation. I will be more careful.

Have a good day!
silversurfer83 (2023-03-25 13:14:03+00:00): Hallo TOM18 :)

vorweg: du kannst auf die Kommentare (diesen hier zum Beispiel) antworten in dem du auf den Link am Ende der Email klickst. Du bekommst für einen Kommentar an deiner Änderung eine Email und dort steht "Weitere Details über den Änderungssatz findest Du unter https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/...". Auf diesen Link klicken und dann links Fenster von OpenStreetMap unter "Diskussion" einfach deine Antwort tippen und auf "Kommentieren" klicken.

Du hast jetzt einen Punkt auf den Gebäudeumriss gesetzt und dem Punkt den name=LWL Poststelle gegeben. Bist du dir sicher, dass genau dort der Eingang ist? Noch sind die Angaben an dem Punkt nicht ausreichend, daher frage ich nach.

Nach einer Anwort können wir weiter gucken :)

Grüße
silversurfer83
gscholz (2023-03-26 06:05:00+00:00): Hi alisari55,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding not connected ways (red dots):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=35.43177&lat=41.57636&zoom=10&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=134066273

As you may know, those ways cannot be used by routing software. Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
eggie (2023-03-24 13:30:27+00:00): Dag Erik... Die versmalling is oke, maar de richting lijkt me niet nodig.

Groet
eggie
bxl-forever (2023-03-24 13:28:36+00:00): Bedankt voor de correctie.

Ter informatie: het is niet nodig of gewenst om de postcode of plaatsnaam in de editor in te vullen.  Wij doen dit niet in België, ze worden automatisch berekend. :-)  Ziehier een voorbeeld: alle punten in dit gebied krijgen automatisch postcode 3040.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3364852
user_5359 (2023-03-24 12:55:24+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I remove your SEO SPAM!
eggie (2023-03-24 13:27:04+00:00): Mik  

Je had de parking al toegevoegd op het vlak. Dus niet nogmaals toevoegen op een node.
Die zal ik even verwijderen.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-03-24 13:34:38+00:00): Kijk even hier hoe je zo'n 'kaartjes' machine kunt toevoegen
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:vending%3Dparking_tickets
gurglypipe (2023-03-24 13:53:25+00:00): Hi! Could you please consider splitting your edits up into smaller geographical areas? For example, this edit could be one edit for Aberdeen, and one for Liverpool.

Large geographical edits mean that many people are notified of the change, even if it’s not relevant for them.

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks :)
jshirt (2023-03-24 14:40:10+00:00): No problem!
Andrea Musuruane (2023-03-25 11:13:10+00:00): Ciao. Dove hai preso il nome, dato che sulla palina non è indicato?
mikki65 (2023-03-25 22:23:08+00:00): Atap non mette nessun cartello ho guardato
Andrea Musuruane (2023-03-25 22:29:39+00:00): Il nome non si inventa e quello sugli orari ATAP è differente. Rimuovo.
mikki65 (2023-03-25 22:47:15+00:00): sul sito  atap e' indicato piazza aldo moro giardi
gscholz (2023-03-26 06:04:18+00:00): Hi alisari55,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding not connected ways (red dots):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=35.43177&lat=41.57636&zoom=10&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=134067431

As you may know, those ways cannot be used by routing software. Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Martin Borsje (2023-04-29 06:21:34+00:00): You (re)mapped the land above and around Fort Eben Emael as military; this is not correct I think as it is demolitarised fully. Can you revert this please?
SFGJimStreet (2023-04-29 07:10:36+00:00): Good morning,
It was not me who put the fort in a military zone. however it is still the property of the Belgian army and managed by an asbl. (or equivalent)
I only replaced the fort in relation to the PICC SPW base map.

(French/English translation by google translation)

Good for you

Jim
Martin Borsje (2023-04-29 07:32:27+00:00): Hi Jim, the previous edit was done by EEBIE (changeset 125900335) where there was no landuse=military tag. By your changeset very very recently 24 March this year the landuse=military was added by you. Possibly a mistake?
And the ownership does not make it use military I guess. Regards, Martin
wireguy (2023-03-24 17:15:14+00:00): hi onave, welcome to osm!   The building on the left should probably be extended to include the garage area since it's attached.   Good job squaring the corners of the building.  Keep mapping!
trigpoint (2024-10-21 13:17:05+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM. 

Please bear in mind that in OSM we map ground truth. Speed limits are a legal maximum, not a target. Please do not change them because you think they are a bit high, the speed limit matches what the sign at the edge of the zone says.

Also why did you change the speed limit for the railway to 70mph, that is obviously very low.

Cheers Phil
bxl-forever (2023-03-24 16:28:29+00:00): Hello,

Thanks for adding a missing house.

Next time, please use "AIV Flanders GRB" background when tracing buildings, instead of aerial imagery.  (Aerial imagery is cool for roads, crossings or low-height objects, even swimming pools, but not for buildings.)

Hope this helps.
Bear-in-a-box (2023-03-26 16:30:58+00:00): Cool. it helps. But it seems literally EVERY house in that neighbourhood needs to be redrawn with AVI Flanders GRB :-(
bxl-forever (2023-03-26 18:11:23+00:00): Quite true.  Some friends are busy with it, there are more buildings or fixes every day.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Belgium/Building_and_address_import/AIV_GRB_building_import
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-05-29 03:03:28+00:00): Hello. Please do not delete content from city relations. Thank you.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166899423
gscholz (2023-03-26 06:02:18+00:00): Hi alisari55,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding not connected ways (red dots):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=31.90064&lat=39.50334&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=134068481

As you may know, those ways cannot be used by routing software. Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
cartofy (2023-03-27 04:57:20+00:00): Hello. Please keep your changeset sizes smaller. Please also try and specify why you are deleting certain roads.
eggie (2023-03-24 13:50:52+00:00): Oke... nuttige info...maarrrrrrrrrrr.. we taggen in OSM bij op de bestaande adresnode. Dus geen adressen aanmaken. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-03-24 13:51:32+00:00): Ik heb de info even  samengevoegd..
gscholz (2023-03-26 06:01:56+00:00): Hi alisari55,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding not connected ways (red dots):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=31.90064&lat=39.50334&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=134068805

As you may know, those ways cannot be used by routing software. Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
GOwin (2023-04-21 22:49:43+00:00): Hello there. 

I was just reviewing the tag usage of residential=slum, and yours is one of the recent edits.

Have you considered using 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aresidential%3Dirregular_settlement instead?
eggie (2023-03-24 14:12:53+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Tip niet te veel schuiven met de kaart in editmodus. Dat geeft soms schade. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-03-24 14:15:48+00:00): Dat kan, maar wanneer iets verdwijnt graag het originele adres intact laten.

Het nieuwe restaurant dus bijtaggen op de juiste adresnode.
Ik pas wat aan.
MVG
eggie
gscholz (2023-03-26 06:01:39+00:00): Hi alisari55,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding not connected ways (red dots):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=31.90064&lat=39.50334&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=134069396

As you may know, those ways cannot be used by routing software. Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Fizzie-DWG (2023-03-25 02:13:29+00:00): Reverted by DWG for vandalism and as apparent sock-puppet:  changeset/134090194
Alexmol (2023-04-11 20:03:52+00:00): Olá.
Agradeço a contribuição na actualização das antenas. No entanto sugiro uma leitura atenta da página wiki sobre comunicações móveis.
Os MNC e os nomes de operadores devem ser separados por ponto e virgula e estarem ordenados por MNC crescente.

Por favor visite:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Key:communication:mobile_phone

Qualquer dúvida disponha.
Alexandre
mueschel (2023-04-12 08:28:38+00:00): Hi, I didn't edit these tags, I guess you want to contact the earlier editors.
Alexmol (2023-04-12 22:43:03+00:00): Ok, thank you for the reply. I'll contact the earlier editor.

Regards
Alexandre
eggie (2023-03-24 14:32:31+00:00): Net over het bruggetjes stond altijd een bord Woonerf.
Is dat bord er niet meer.. Waarom maxspeed 15 als het hier geen woonerf is.

Een highway=residential is geen woonerf. 
De voorgaande mapper is een ervaren mapper. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-03-24 14:33:40+00:00): Ik denk dat het allemaal woonerf is in dit wijkje.
PixelDonut (2023-03-24 19:53:25+00:00): De borden staan er nog wel, dit hele wijkje is inderdaad een woonerf
PixelDonut (2023-03-24 19:53:53+00:00): Dus welke straat moet het dan zijn?
PixelDonut (2023-03-24 19:55:44+00:00): Oh ik zie nu je andere bericht, ik zal de rest van de wijk dan ook wel even aanpassen naar living street
eggie (2023-03-24 19:59:01+00:00): Oke Top!
  Die Urban  snelheid zal dan denk ik wel naar maxspeed 15 moeten.

Veel plezier met mappen... 

Groet
eggie
PixelDonut (2023-03-24 20:12:02+00:00): En even een kleine vraag, is het oke als ik de changenotes in Nederlands schijf, of heeft Engels een voorkeur?
eggie (2023-03-24 20:18:10+00:00): Je kunt gewoon in het Nederlands de changesetcommentaar toevoegen .. Geen probleem.
Het is meestal de landstaal of Engels.
eggie (2023-03-24 14:19:53+00:00): Feedback.. Dit is oke.. Helaas rendert dit nog niet op de standaardkaart. Het is wel vindbaar. Somt als de vlag de lading dekt voeg ik office=therapist toe. Dan rendert het wel.
MVG
eggie
Jay May (2023-03-27 11:51:33+00:00): Зачем поменяете name=*  тег на русский язык если уже есть на name:ru?
name=* должен быть как на месте есть. А на месте видно "Петропавл" a не "Петропавловск"
Jay May (2023-03-27 11:54:17+00:00): Таксамо - "Өскемен" na name должен быть. "Усть-Каменогорск" на name:ru.
user_18789252 (2023-03-24 14:36:43+00:00): OK gut...
trigpoint (2025-03-19 16:32:47+00:00): Hello
I know this edit was mad 2 years ago but if https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/33478285 is oneway and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1159381827 is private how do customers get out?

Cheers Phil
whb (2023-04-02 21:18:08+00:00): Guten Tag,

motor_vehicle=no ist nicht richtig, denn einspurige KFZ (wie z.B. Motorräder) dürfen hier durch fahren. Somit war der Abschnitt mit motorcar=no schon richtig erfasst.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/723729436
Verbessert.

Viele Grüße
whb
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-03-25 15:15:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134107342 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to vandalism and creating fake springs with nonsense names at random places.
Something B (2023-04-30 13:15:11+00:00): Hi, Marc!
14 hot springs (?) from maps.me user. Maybe fakes. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135516632
Regards, 
Something B.
eggie (2023-03-24 15:07:12+00:00): Mooi... Een Geldmaat.. Ik heb de name=Primera Binnen wel verwijderd.
name tags nooit gebruiken om iets te beschrijven. ..description=...  kan wel.
eggie
martianfreeloader (2023-03-26 19:47:42+00:00): Hi,
Great thing that you're adding all these service roads!

Just a small advice: You tend to create changesets with large spatial extent. This makes is hard for others to understand what you're doing and also to spot mistakes (which happen to everyone).

You make life easier for your fellow mappers if you create smaller changesets.
wireguy (2023-03-24 15:44:48+00:00): Adrian, welcome to osm!  homework assignment?    Buildings should not include description information as a name, and should not include personal information (please remove).   Also, BIng imagery is probably newer in this area.   Try and outline the buildings more accurately.  They should have squared corners.  If you press the Q key when the building is selected, the corners will square for you.   Keep mapping.   If you have q's, just ask.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134071650
seattlefyi (2023-03-24 17:09:34+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM! I just briefly checked the buildings you drew -- they look pretty good, but a quick tip is that once you 1. draw each one 2. tag it as a building, then with the building selected you can 3. press 'q' (or right-click select the squaring tool) to make the corners 90 degrees (if they're close already). It can make the resulting building look tidier. Thanks again for the edits!
requiredlable (2023-03-24 14:50:56+00:00): this data from Wright County GIS database:

502305.338068143	142652.614538312	105700	716 40TH ST SE	716	40TH	ST	 	SE	 	 	BUFFALO	MN	55313	208300194200	0	45.09447642	-93.87440723	45.0944764197091, -93.8744072337615			GWP7599	2018/07/23 00:00:00+00
gscholz (2023-03-25 12:22:58+00:00): Hi Fidelis Assis,
this changeset has destroyed several boundary relations:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-48.68432&lat=-5.39052&zoom=8&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

I have just fixed this. Please watch out what you are doing.

Kind regards
Guido
Fidelis Assis (2023-05-13 23:08:15+00:00): Sorry, didn't see your message. I've been manually updating/fixing municipality limits in Brazil. More than 5.000 boundary ways updated/fixed now. Unfortunatelly a few mistakes happen, but I always fix them as soon as I find a mistake.
Thanks for fixing that.
gurglypipe (2023-03-27 08:26:27+00:00): Heya, I don’t think this is right. The water sinks into the ground here, but there is no surface depression caused by subsurface breakdown. i.e. No sinkhole, just a water/stream sink.

See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sinkhole for some of the terminology definitions
gurglypipe (2023-03-28 21:57:48+00:00): Reverted as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/134237926
user_18305684 (2023-03-28 22:20:38+00:00): Only one natural=water_sink

https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1t3w

But in the real world, many streams disappear into the ground.

So probably there is a better tag in osm (better because more often used).
gurglypipe (2023-03-28 22:23:45+00:00): Sure, there might be a better tag than natural=water_sink, but I don’t think natural=sinkhole is it, because natural=sinkhole requires a significant depression in the ground.

In any case, after some more research we can avoid the issue because the stream actually appears to be culverted and then heads further west. I’ve changed that in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/134238394 :)
user_18305684 (2023-03-28 22:27:13+00:00): My proposal :
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/waterway=sink
gurglypipe (2023-03-28 22:30:49+00:00): Thanks, that looks like an appropriate tag, I’ll try and remember that for future use :)
luisforte (2023-03-24 17:30:06+00:00): Olá,
A tag place=region não tem uso em Portugal. Também não faz sentido marcá-la com uma área, dado todos nós termos os nossos conceitos pessoais na definição de uma área não descrita fisicamente no terreno, daí estes lugares serem normalmente marcados com um ponto. De qualquer forma a aldeia que referes já se encontra correctamente mapeada com um ponto (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5476732784), pelo que faz sentido eliminar esta linha. 
Boa continuação, LF
eggie (2023-03-24 15:53:00+00:00): Je kunt satellietdataportaal.nl gebruiken:
https://www.satellietdataportaal.nl/?base=openstreetmap&res=0.3%2C0.5&datemin=24-03-2022&loc=52.49920%2C6.078621%2C18z&overlay=mos-0&marker=loc&acqdate=2023-03-17&acqid=20230317_104610_PNEO-03_1_23&sensor=Pleiades-NEO

Laatste foto 17 maart 2023
garaolaza (2023-03-27 06:42:29+00:00): Estas modificaciones tuyas me parecen penosas, pero no voy a empezar un edit-war. El número de apariciones en Google no demuestra nada. Los pastores que vivían ahí no tenían ordenador.