piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
DUGA (2024-04-04 15:59:05+00:00): What you did here is completely wrong, you literally cut the river and disconnect them.

PA legislature has not updated the boundary for decades, many of them used to follow rivers or street but due to terrain changes they are not accurate anymore.

I don't want to argue with you over how PA legislature works, but you are required to fix the broken river way or I have to report this changeset.
Messinian (2024-04-04 20:48:55+00:00): Sorry about the broken river. I’ll fix that, I was focused on the boundary relation. In general the guidance is not to use features like rivers as members in a boundary relation unless the boundary is specifically defined this way legally. Is that case here that you are aware of?
DUGA (2024-04-04 20:53:25+00:00): Many boundaries are based on rivers (could be centerline or bank). iD has a layer of PA boundary and we can use it, it is mostly the same as Census.
Messinian (2024-04-04 21:01:54+00:00): I fixed the creek. BTW, you might try assuming good intent as required by the code of conduct before threatening to report a changeset.  I suspect we are going to be dealing with each other in this area and I don’t mind debate or someone pointing out that I made a mistake, but I ask you keep it civil or I may have to report you for a breach of the OSM code of conduct.
DUGA (2024-04-04 21:14:44+00:00): Unfortunately, there is no threatening, you can be reported by anyone at any time even without a reason. OSM DWG will determine the issue. Based on your editing history, I will “have to” watch your edits closely.

Disconnecting a river is 100% considered vandalism regardless of your intent. Attaching/drawing boundaries not 100% the same as any “official” source is actually not, just take a look at China vs India around Tibet. 

Back to the states, many digital boundaries you see online might not be updated, you need to be careful when importing/following them.

You will not become a friend of anyone over the Internet, code of conduct is the lowest standard, and I didn’t violate it.
Messinian (2024-04-04 21:54:18+00:00): I really have no desire to be at odds with  you.  I am still learning and am bound to make some mistakes, but I assure you it is never intentional.  I am happy to fix any mistakes.

On the boundaries, I agree that it’s difficult to find an authoritative source for these boundaries. I did find the Census BAS files, which according to the webpage are sourced directly from the local governments.  That map for Jessup township does appear to follow the creek, but I have not been able to determine if that is legislatively defined that way. In this case, do have a recommendation for how best to map it?  It seems that using a water feature in an administrative boundary leaves open a lot of room for accidental edits of one or the other (as evidenced by my mistake).  In this case, I doubt many people would care either way, but I’m curious about this for other areas where it may be more relevant.

You can also pm me on OSM US slack (same user name) if you see something else I need to fix. 

I live in Susquehanna county and my motivations are to simply improve the map here given that rural areas are usually overlooked.
hoserab (2024-04-04 18:19:19+00:00): FYI the Telus Spark science centre in Calgary was never called "Telus World of Science". I've manually reverted your change to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/171779909. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149582478.
PizzaTreeIsland (2024-08-17 17:42:00+00:00): Hello, 
I have noticed that you tagged a lot of features with dog=voice_control. This is an uncommon tag that is only in use in this area. What do you mean by it? Are dogs allowed as long as the owners make sure they're quiet? Is there an official sign or something similar around to communicate such a rule? 
If it's actually like that, I would suggest using dog=yes and note=* instead, using the note tag to explain this rule. 
Thanks and happy mapping!
valhikes (2024-08-18 04:26:24+00:00): Having dogs under strict voice control when off leash is a legal requirement in Humboldt County and many other places. You can find a description in this brochure by the folks who manage the land just south of this change set: https://www.friendsofthedunes.org/_files/ugd/a9c01c_7fdb2e1230304bad8a467d86d5b195d1.pdf
Dodko (2024-04-04 16:14:23+00:00): Adresa sa má dať do budovy a nie na POI bod.
NandaraRitsu (2024-04-04 17:49:12+00:00): OK.
Filip009 (2024-04-05 21:11:37+00:00): Áno, keďže ste to pridal aj na budovu, je to duplicita. Z budovy môžete značky pre prevádzku odstrániť.
Xvtn (2024-04-04 16:34:05+00:00): Hi! Your addition here has major problems with its tags. If you are the business owner, welcome to OSM! Please reply here or message me and we can get it fixed! If you are a marketing company creating accounts on behalf of clients, please review your process and learn more about OSM's tagging schema before making more edits.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149578659
BHSPitMonkey (2024-04-04 06:35:21+00:00): Apologies for the mistake in the changeset description. Force of habit :)

Youbou is in BC, Canada
tekim (2024-04-04 16:25:54+00:00): Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap!  Thanks for citing the sources for this edit, that is important.  Unfortunately, we are not allowed to use Google Maps, which you cite as a source, when editing OpenStreetMap due to Google's terms of use.
tekim (2024-04-04 16:26:18+00:00): Reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149578260
tekim (2024-04-06 17:03:30+00:00): Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap!  Thanks for your edits to the map.  When you said that one of your sources was "Google", do you mean Google Maps, Google Earth, Google Street View, or something else?
TomPet66 (2024-04-06 18:29:03+00:00): It was the Google-APP under iOS: I used it to get the opening hours and thenfinal address, as it’s pretty tricky with the buildings belonging to Bonner Str. or already Reiterstaffelplatz.
Most information was my personal „investigations“ as I live in the direct neighbourhood :-)
tekim (2024-04-06 20:32:27+00:00): Thanks for the reply.
mcliquid (2024-04-04 07:45:20+00:00): Hello, the street here is definitely not called "Melisau", there is no street sign for it. The official and official name here is "Bregenzerwaldstraße". The addr:-tags should therefore remain in place.
mcliquid (2024-04-04 07:45:44+00:00): *official and legal name
mcliquid (2024-04-04 07:50:36+00:00): See our a screenshot from our official GIS: https://ibb.co/ZJjGbNC
Kookykooky (2024-04-04 12:00:52+00:00): I looked at https://www.geoland.at/webgisviewer/geoland/map/Geoland_Viewer/Geoland and there is the street name Melisau, if you don't agree you can change it back. ... But I know that the official addresses here have the name "Melisau xxx, Egg" not "Bregenzerwaldstraße xxx, Egg", something is probably strange...
mcliquid (2024-04-04 12:53:03+00:00): The entire Bregenzerwald is made up of hundreds of small hamlets, which are gradually being grouped together into village associations. The hamlet of Melisau was grouped into the municipality of Egg. In order to be able to correctly read the GIS in Austria, it is necessary to become familiar with the operation there, as it is not possible to insert unnamed residential roads in the GIS. For this reason, all residential roads throughout Austria always have a name, which is incorrect in reality. In order for "addr:street" to be used, a physical street name on a sign is required. See example: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Haselstauden-Stra%C3%9Fenschilder.jpg
Respectively, the name must have been dedicated to the street. This is not the case here, there is no sign. The hamlet is called "Melisau", so "addr:place" was already correct before.

It is correct that the addresses here are "Melisau 123, 6863 Egg", but Melisau is not a single street, but the entire village. I am therefore changing it back so that it matches the more than 100 other villages with the same system. Thank you.
Kookykooky (2024-04-04 13:05:42+00:00): ok, thanks for the explanation
tekim (2024-04-06 00:49:54+00:00): Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap!  It is great to have you as part of our community.  Thanks for your edits to the map. Unfortunately, when editing OpenStreetMap we are not allowed to use Google Maps due to Google's terms of use.
tekim (2024-04-06 00:50:11+00:00): Reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149636989
Ltrlg (2024-04-04 10:54:37+00:00): You should stop deleting ways that obviously exist (based on Bing aerials) without any justification. If they are misclassified, please fix their classification instead.

Furthermore, please ensure that your changeset comments match what you are really doing. “Data insertion” is not a correct description of a deletion-only changeset.
RicoElectrico (2024-05-06 00:52:17+00:00): Cześć, wg tej uwagi przenieśli go gdzie indziej. Czy uwaga jest błędna? (Nie jest to wykluczone :P)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3212954
tomzyl (2024-04-05 09:11:56+00:00): ruch odbywa się jezdnią starą i nową... W dodatku ruch w okolicy zajazdu jest rozdzielony - to jest do korekty. Stary ślad jest wciąż użytkowany.
Sebastian | Yanosik (2024-04-05 09:20:06+00:00): Nie usuwałem starego śladu. Zmiany po mnie robił jeszcze użytkownik szalona_entropia. Rozdzielenie ruchu sprawdzę na śladach GPS użytkowników nawigacji i jeśli będzie tam widoczny to wprowadzę zmiany.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-06 06:55:51+00:00): Hello!

Note that you do not need to add description of feature type as a name.
For example when mapping tree it is enough to specify that it is a tree, no need for putting that name of this specific tree is "Tree".

So for buildings it is not needed to put House as their name.

Or do you maybe know that this specific object mapped at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1268977335 is specifically named with such name?

And if it was mistake - can you edit map to remove this name?
    
Do not worry too much about this issue - I made way worse mistakes when I was starting. Maybe some tool or explanation is confusing? Why you added this name? Note that I am asking as maybe something can be fixed to be less confusing.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-06 06:56:06+00:00): 

Also, ideally geometries would be improved a bit! This buildings have a bit different shape.

Also, if building is forming a rectangle in reality: you can select a line and press q to make it more regular.
Leo Slager (2024-04-04 11:17:35+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
matarranyacorrector (2024-04-04 09:01:00+00:00): La etiqueta name:ca=* es correcta. No es correcto eliminar intencionadamente traducciones correctas.
joost schouppe (2024-04-05 12:18:06+00:00): Dag Boris,
Ik zie de meerwaarde niet van deze info te wissen. Deze tags zorgen ervoor dat de informatie zichtbaar wordt voor rolstoelgebruikers. Als je wil meegeven "voldoet aan de federale regels", dan kan je daar eventueel een nieuwe tag voor toevoegen. Of eventueel kan je voorstellen dat de barnd:wikidata als eigenschap krijgt "alle vestigingen toegabkelijk", al lijkt me dat bijzonder onpraktisch. Bovendien is de specifieke breedte van de deur sowieso interessant, ongeacht of dat minstens zo breed is als de regel of niet. Ik draai je bewerking terug.
borishag (2024-04-08 07:30:41+00:00): Hallo Joost,

Ik ben het niet helemaal met je eens, Het toevoegen van deze waardes waarvan de meeste aan verandering onderhevig zijn (winkels veranderen hun indeling meerdere malen per jaar) hebben weinig nut om in OSM opgenomen te worden omdat gegevens hier een min of meer permanent karakter hebben. Als Rolstoelgebruikers zelf bij willen houden wat de waarden zijn, die ze dan na iedere winkel aanpassing zelf moeten veranderen, zouden ze dat in een eigen register moeten doen waarbij een daarnaar verwijzende URL opgenomen kan worden in OSM.
joost schouppe (2024-04-08 09:17:52+00:00): Boris,
Het gaat over de breedte van de voordeur en de hoogte van de drempel. Dit lijkt me aan weinig verandering onderhevig.
borishag (2024-04-09 08:54:22+00:00): Joost,

Ik ga dit even overleggen met mijn collega's buiten de Benelux waar we actief zijn of hier een internationale ruling over is. De uniformiteit van de inrichting van nodes speelt hierin een rol, in Nederland en Luxemburg speelt dit namelijk niet.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-04-04 08:40:28+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/413933712
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/413936699

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
BCNorwich (2024-04-04 12:16:14+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Address tags shouldn't be placed on highways, I've removed a few.

Regards Bernard.
A67-A67 (2024-04-07 20:24:03+00:00): Hi,
Addresses are tagged on separate nodes. Tonnaerhof 7 was already present at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10675624155

I've removed the duplicated address from the building.
Supaplex030 (2024-04-04 20:45:21+00:00): Hallo momabebra,

vieler deiner Änderungen in OSM sind leider immer wieder mit Informationsverlust verbunden, hier hast du beispielsweise Rad- und Gehweginformationen reduziert, von falschen Tags zu schweigen. Unnötigerweise löschst du immer wieder Segmente, um sie anschließend selbst neu zu erstellen und mit StreetComplete zu vervollständigen. In anderen Changesets in dieser Gegend hast du ebenfalls Informationen reduziert, z.B. Einfahrten gelöscht. Das du gleichzeitig sinnvolle Informationen ergänzt, macht die Sache nicht besser.

Immer wieder werden zudem Changesets von dir von anderen Mappern kommentiert, ohne das du darauf eingehst. Das ist ein absolutes No Go in einem Community-Projekt wie OpenStreetMap.

Ich bitte dich daher dringend:
- Gehe sorgfältiger bei Datenänderungen vor und lösche/verfälsche keine bereits vorhandenen Daten.
- Höre mit Löschungen an bereits erfassten Wegen auf, nur um diese anschließend selbst neu zu erstellen und mit StreetComplete zu vervollständigen.
- Antworte auf Changeset-Kommentare anderer User zu deinen Änderungen.

Solltest du dein Mapping-Verhalten – auf deren Mängel du mehrfach hingewiesen wurdest – nicht verbessern, sehe ich mich gezwungen, die Data Working Group einzuschalten und eine temporäre Sperre zu erwirken, wenigstens, bis du auf Changeset-Kommentare eingehst. Eine Reaktion auf Hinweise und Kommentare anderer User ist Voraussetzung für ein Gelingen von und die Teilnahme an OSM.

Bitte teile mir mit, ob du diese Nachricht erhalten hast, ansonsten gehe ich davon aus, dass du aus irgendwelchen Gründen keine Benachrichtigungen über Changeset-Kommentare erhälst und diese nicht liest. In diesem Fall gibt es die Möglichkeit einer sog. 0-Stunden-Sperre, um dich auf die Kontaktversuche anderer Mapper hinzuweisen und eine Reaktion zu erwirken.

Sollte ich einen falschen Eindruck deiner Aktivitäten haben, freue ich mich ebenfalls über eine Rückmeldung.

lg, Alex
Xvtn (2024-04-04 16:33:36+00:00): Hi! Your addition here has major problems with its tags. If you are the business owner, welcome to OSM! Please reply here or message me and we can get it fixed! If you are a marketing company creating accounts on behalf of clients, please review your process and learn more about OSM's tagging schema before making more edits.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149578649
literan (2024-04-04 18:08:30+00:00): добрый день. Спидкамы ставят на линию дороги. Поправлю.
Vas111 (2024-04-05 11:28:10+00:00): Понял, спасибо
zidel (2024-04-11 20:05:39+00:00): Reverterte endringen på en del av en vei på østlandet som jeg antar var et uhell i changeset 149880694.
jxpsert (2024-04-04 18:18:08+00:00): Hoi! Klopt de tagging van https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11786495929 ?

In principe is het niet de bedoeling om image=* tags te hergebruiken, tenzij de 2 objecten identiek zijn - zelfde merk, zelfde kast, zelfde locatie.

Kan je bevestigen dat dat hier het geval is, of anders de informatie corrigeren?
opendcc (2024-04-05 16:23:28+00:00): Hast Du das vor Ort angesehen?
Langlaeufer (2024-04-05 15:44:26+00:00): Hallo Leinemasch, willkommen bei OSM
Gehwegplatten bitte als paving_stone erfassen. concrete:plates sind Schwerlast-Betonplatten, für 
Fahrbahnen.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:surface
vasony (2024-04-05 19:46:18+00:00): Szia Géza!

Mi az a betárcsázott szakasz?
Mindenesetre biztos nem a neve az útnak, valahogy jelöljük máshogy.

Köszi, Tamás
grozsa11 (2024-04-07 06:47:07+00:00): Opsz, bocs, csakugyan. A megjegyzésbe szántam. 
(A terület gazdája -gondolom- használni kezdte a földet, betárcsázta.)
L'imaginaire (2024-04-05 13:38:21+00:00): Dit lijkt me niet de correcte Velopark-referentie. Deze fietsenstalling hoort volgens mij bij de appartementsgebouwen en wordt volgens mij niet beheerd door de NMBS.
Xvtn (2024-04-04 16:33:08+00:00): Hi! Your addition here has major problems with its tags. If you are the business owner, welcome to OSM! Please reply here or message me and we can get it fixed! If you are a marketing company creating accounts on behalf of clients, please review your process and learn more about OSM's tagging schema before making more edits. Please provide a descriptive changeset comment, and don't include things like "keywords" or other SEO-related info.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149578636
sly (2025-07-07 08:20:56+00:00): Salut ravenfeld, 
J'y suis passé hier et j'ai cherché, mais ce chemin n'existe pas. Il y a bien quelques sentiers de moutons, mais rien d'entretenu ni signalisé. Les herbes sont hautes, cloture du berger, bref, ça passe pas vraiment mieux que n'importe où sur l'alpage. C'est sans doute un risque avec Strava, plusieurs utilisateurs ne qualifient pas leur traces, il a peut-être simplement fait du "dré dans l'pentu"
ravenfeld (2025-07-07 08:29:21+00:00): Sur les cartes satellite on voit une trace, mais c'est le terrain qui fait fois. Si  ca existe plus tu as bien fait de supprimer. Après pour le balisage il n'a jamais été dans le PDIPR du coup c'est normal.
Je pense que c'est plus une chemin d'usage ou d'une course.
IMAN SELEMAN (2024-04-04 09:57:08+00:00): I have added buildings
IMAN SELEMAN (2024-04-04 10:02:10+00:00): I added buildings
marczoutendijk_repair (2024-04-05 08:54:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149603227 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to vandalism.
zorglubu (2024-04-06 16:51:30+00:00): Bonjour,

OpenStreetMap n'est pas destiné à saisir des informations personnelles qui peuvent être considérées comme une dégradation de la carte.

Par contre, si vous saisissez de vraies améliorations de la carte, vous êtes bienvenu !

Il y a sûrement plein de choses réelles à améliorer autour de chez vous. Et vous verrez, cela procure encore plus de plaisir que des graffitis.
:-)
pza (2024-04-05 20:04:00+00:00): Looks like it was (accidently?) deleted 2 weeks ago in 148847436.
marczoutendijk_repair (2024-04-05 08:54:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149603227 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to vandalism.
marczoutendijk_repair (2024-04-05 08:54:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149603227 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to vandalism.
Filip009 (2024-04-05 20:23:15+00:00): Zdravím, osmc:symbol, ktorý ste pridal väčšinou symbolizuje náučný chodník. Ste si ním istý? https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/osmc_symbols.html#
Narušiteľ (2024-04-06 08:33:21+00:00): Dakujem za upozrnenie. Opravene na ZNAČKA K INÉMU OBJEKTU
Jonathan Ng@ (2024-04-04 13:57:56+00:00): 感谢编辑！
Nordpfeil (2024-04-05 11:44:05+00:00): You tagged 4 buildings with "Pikkutikankuja=2". I saw that "Pikkutikankuja" ist also the street name, so may be it should be tagged "housenumber=2"???
But all 4 buildings? Could you ckeck it.
str (2024-04-06 09:19:18+00:00): Thank you for noticing, I've fixed that. Housenumber for those is unknown until surveyed.
rskedgell (2024-04-04 15:51:00+00:00): If you have deleted features which actually exist, but which you want to censor from the map, please don't.

The following page puts the case in some detail:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F
rskedgell (2024-04-09 08:45:13+00:00): As you have not responded, this has been reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149765275
YomanNH (2024-04-04 17:35:16+00:00): Cześć,
droga dla pieszych i rowerzystów to highway=path, a nie highway=footway. Poprawiłem: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149580741
santamariense (2024-04-04 13:34:56+00:00): Olá EtVal,

Qual a fonte do nome "Avenida Benito Mussolini"?
marczoutendijk (2024-04-05 08:42:23+00:00): User is blocked and all edits have been reverted.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15923

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
marczoutendijk_repair (2024-04-05 08:54:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149603227 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to vandalism.
Hufkratzer (2024-04-05 21:55:26+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1269015539 looks like a jumping arena on Bing and probably belongs to https://www.cianoconnor.com.  But you have mapped it as a horse riding centre.
In OSM riding arenas are usually tagged leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian (like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1216308778) and there is preset for them that sets these tags. You can use the tag leisure=horse_riding to map the whole riding centre, example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/756760650
Own Oh (2024-04-06 10:58:52+00:00): Thanks for this, have altered the tags to reflect this. Always learning.
Hufkratzer (2024-04-06 22:25:03+00:00): You have changed the leisure tag of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1269015539/history from horse_riding to pitch and then back from pitch to horse_riding. I don't understand why. As I wrote before: "In OSM riding arenas are usually tagged leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian (like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1216308778) and there is preset for them that sets these tags."
rskedgell (2024-04-09 08:50:24+00:00): Pond tags restored. As effectively deleting the pond this was not mentioned in your changeset comment, I have assumed this was unintentional (and not the deliberate deletion of an existing feature, which is generally considered to be vandalism).

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149765428
dieterdreist (2024-04-04 17:36:36+00:00): this looks very much like vandalism and should likely be reverted
marczoutendijk (2024-04-05 08:41:58+00:00): User is blocked and all edits have been reverted.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15923

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
gurglypipe (2024-04-04 21:28:24+00:00): Heya, thanks again for the ongoing improvements around Gressingham! Just a note: the convention is to tag U and C roads with highway_authority_ref= rather than ref=, because the latter is meant for references which are verifiable on the ground (i.e. the road numbers have to be on a signpost somewhere). I don’t recall seeing U or C refs signed anywhere locally, so I suggest highway_authority_ref= might be more appropriate.

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway_authority_ref#United_Kingdom

If that makes sense to you, I can go through and make the necessary changes to switch to highway_authority_ref=.
amcclements (2024-04-05 13:58:52+00:00): No worries, I'll take care of it.
gurglypipe (2024-04-05 14:00:46+00:00): Thanks!
mikkolukas (2024-06-09 02:05:02+00:00): Der er ikke separate highways for højresving på Landevejen.

Vi mapper ikke enkelte vognbaner som separate veje på OpenStreetMap.