piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-01-31 21:49:27+00:00): This changeset removed hotel and building tags
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161834358
Dillen GJ (2025-02-01 08:18:09+00:00): Correction made, added building=prison, problem should be solved by this.
Dillen GJ (2025-02-02 08:14:16+00:00): Problem started within ID: if you type gevangenis (Dutch for prison) it only shows prison area (gevangenisgebied) as only selectable item.
Reason why the building is defined as prison is: historical this building was a prison and is as municipal heritage known as such.
Dillen GJ (2025-02-02 08:15:36+00:00): Where can I report the ‘flaw’ within ID ?
Dillen GJ (2025-02-02 08:39:23+00:00): With in the Dutch forum the rule is made that: the building gets the historical (former) function if it is a heritage building & the adress gets its present function with proper attached keys & key values.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-02-02 09:25:08+00:00): Tags should reflect current usage.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-02-02 09:26:12+00:00): For historic tagging use https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-02-02 09:30:11+00:00): Can you link the forum discussion?
Tjuro (2025-02-02 10:52:54+00:00): Hello Spaghetti Monster,

I think Dillen GJ is referring to having the building= tag reflect the original purpose of the building.

Adding poi tags like amenity=prison to buildings is not part of that.

In NL we do more strictly enforce separation between poi's and buildings. amenity=* should never be on a building even if it is still in use.

I have modified the building.

Greetings,

Tjuro
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-02-02 12:21:11+00:00): Thank you Tjuro for clarification. 
I wasn't aware of this distinction previously.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-02-02 12:23:14+00:00): https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema
Glassman (2025-01-28 20:47:36+00:00): You can't just change the address without moving the node to the new location. I'm going to revert these edits. Let me know if you need help doing this right.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161834430
gscholz (2025-02-04 10:26:18+00:00): Hallo Norbert,
dieser Changeset hat Fehler in der OSM Datanbank bezüglich selbst überschneidender Linien:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=37.93980&lat=2.31310&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=161834547

Im Speziellen ist hier Weg 922905225 betroffen:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/922905225

Kannst du das bitte reparieren?
Beste Grüße
Guido
Norbert Dichter (2025-02-04 17:07:16+00:00): Danke Guido, ich denke ich konnte das reparieren. 

Fixed some issues with intersectioning points in residential area. Fixed that as well.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161834547
Norbert Dichter (2025-02-04 17:33:11+00:00): Ist so o.k.?

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=162134536
gscholz (2025-02-04 18:39:08+00:00): Danke für die rasche Reaktion, sieht gut aus.
yrtimiD (2025-01-28 13:09:42+00:00): Hi, this is a big change and a big shift. I just want to ensure that you firstly aligned aerial images to existing GPX tracks before moving object?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Using_aerial_imagery#GPS_tracks

Also, when tracing high buildings, we should trace their bottom and not the roof.
americium_BY (2025-01-28 18:16:30+00:00): That's what I tried to do. If you have suggestions for improvement, I'm all ears.
yrtimiD (2025-01-28 22:57:19+00:00): There are some GPX tracks in this area, I tried to align aerial imagery and looks like some building was misaligned before and not much aligned now. But this is very inaccurate since work is mostly manual.
In general, nodes re-alignment is problematic as in most cases you need to move everything, including roads around...
americium_BY (2025-01-31 08:05:29+00:00): Indeed, there was some misalignment in some nodes. It was seen in the imagery, also for someone who knows those nodes and buildings. I did the best I can.
Mark Dominus (2025-01-27 21:07:13+00:00): Resolves note 4604331
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4604331
flohoff (2025-01-28 19:45:54+00:00): Hi,
i saw your changesets all over the place. 

Has there been a discussion concerning this mechanical edit somewhere?

Can you point me to the discusssion. 

Flo
dpolovinkin (2025-05-29 09:50:24+00:00): добрый день, аккуратно, вы добавили всю территорию телебашни как здание, так нельзя, уберу и добавлю нормальную точку где сама башня

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1354747502
stasiu512 (2025-01-27 21:19:46+00:00): Cześć, dlaczego w takim razie tu zostawiłeś trunk_link?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/66518808
szalona_entropia (2025-01-28 09:33:38+00:00): Tamten fragment służy tylko do wjazdu na i zjazdu z Sucharskiego/trunk. Więc na upartego może zostać jako trunk_link, chociaż nie są takie przypadki dobrze zdefiniowane i właściwie lepiej żeby tam też było tertiary. Gdyby to miejsce było oznakowane jako skrzyżowanie o ruchu okrężnym, to na pewno by nie mogło być _link.
urbalazs (2025-01-28 21:55:27+00:00): Ebben a módosításcsomagban elneveztél egy szakaszt a Sóstónál „Másik út”-nak. Ez pontosan micsoda? Egy tanösvény? Van róla fényképed?
utvonalfelmeresek (2025-01-29 05:57:14+00:00): Van egy ösvény, ami elé egy táblán ki van írva:
https://panoramax.openstreetmap.fr/#background=streets&focus=pic&map=19.43/47.169748/18.419623&pic=43e25b5d-bdaf-408e-be76-b7ded2ec2930&speed=250&xyz=206.00/0.00/30
urbalazs (2025-01-29 07:36:25+00:00): Köszönöm a képet, így már érthető. A név helyesen „A másik út”, és ez nem az ösvény neve, hanem az információs tábla felirata. Az ösvényről töröltem a nevet, elég a táblán szerepeltetni.
utvonalfelmeresek (2025-01-29 10:57:00+00:00): Ez megint egy filozófiai kérdés, hiszen a települések utcáin is csak a táblára van írva a név :) de részemről mindegy, csak gondoltam belefér a névbe is.
mcliquid (2025-01-28 07:45:12+00:00): Hier sieht man links und rechts die Schilder "Fahrradstraße" noch: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1052334282322111
jeka p (2025-01-30 19:00:22+00:00): Jetzt gibt es diese Beschilderung entweder "links" oder "rechts".
Rechts (Richtung) Fußballplatz habe ich gelöscht, da ich beide Straßenenden gesehen habe.
Links würde ich derzeit so lassen (Mein Sohn war schon zu müde für großere Runde)
mcliquid (2025-01-28 07:41:33+00:00): Schade, war die Fahrradstraße hier nur ein "Versuch" der wieder rückgängig gemacht wurde?
jeka p (2025-01-30 18:56:35+00:00): Hi!
Es gibt hier keine Beschilderung "Fahrradstraße" mehr.
Dafür ist hier jetzt zum Teil neu asphaltiert:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/364470381#map=17/47.360510/9.644627
SG
mcliquid (2025-01-28 07:43:57+00:00): Hi, ich finde surface=asphalt und tracktype=grade2 passen nicht zusammen, was meinst du?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1354752655
jeka p (2025-01-30 18:57:39+00:00): Hi!
danke - habe angepasst. Ist mir durchgerutscht
paulbrunner (2025-01-27 21:40:51+00:00): Correct changeset comment: added disabled parking, adjusted parking to swisstopo imagery.
JeroenHoek (2025-02-01 18:06:33+00:00): Kijk na het importeren ook of je nergens overlapt met andere objecten. Woonbootligplaats 0055020000288222 is er niet meer. Je had deze opnieuw geïmporteerd over de steigers heen die er nu liggen.

Deze is bekend bij de BAG-afdeling van Leeuwarden vernam ik, maar ze kunnen deze schijnbaar niet zomaar intrekken omdat niet bekend is wat daar precies speelt.
s777n (2025-01-28 16:04:41+00:00): Когда вы рисуете пожалуйста двигайте спутниковые снимки. У них может быть достаточно большое смещение и объекты будут нарисованы где-то в стороне.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%98%D1%81%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%B7%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%B0%D1%8D%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%84%D0%BE%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B2

Bing в большинстве мест это старые снимки и лучше попереключать слои (иконка справа) и найти более свежий снимок. В большинстве случаев esri будет свежее но не всегда.
Anas masuris (2025-01-27 22:18:52+00:00): https://www.plk-sa.pl/o-spolce/biuro-prasowe/informacje-prasowe/szczegoly/nowe-mozliwosci-transportu-ladunkow-koleja-do-portu-w-gdansku-10446

Alternatywny link
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-01-31 21:47:15+00:00): reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161993424
OSMCowboy (2025-01-31 18:02:43+00:00): Correction: Source used was Esri World Imagery.
Marek-M (2025-01-28 11:29:13+00:00): Super zmiana!! Dzięki!!👋
kwiatek_123 (2025-01-27 22:39:17+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161837452
NorthCrab_upload (2025-01-27 22:51:09+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nieprawidłowa wartość addr:postcode.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/946080508

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/766594313
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/766594315
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/768093110
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/768093112
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/768093113
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/768093114
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/768093115
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/768093118
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/768093119
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/768093120
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/768093121
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/768093123
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/768093124
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/768093125
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/768093127
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/768093128
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/768093129
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/768093161
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/768093162
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/768283892
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/768283894
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/768283904
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/768283908
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/768283909
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/768283910
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/768299778
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/768299780
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/768299790
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/768299792
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/768299793
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/768664209
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/768664213
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/946080631
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/946080685
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/946080686
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/946080687
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/946080688
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/946080689
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/946080690
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/946080717
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/946080718
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/946080720
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/946080721
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/946081744
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/946082026
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/995831582
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/995831591
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/995831592
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/995831598
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/995831599
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/995831600
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/995831601
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/995831602
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/995831608
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1126122828
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1126122829
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1214300197
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1248331160
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1313042112
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1354763828
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1354763830
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1354763831
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1354763832
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1354763833

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
quincylvania (2025-01-27 22:42:11+00:00): Add protected_area=wildlife_refuge to national wildlife refuges
Glassman (2025-01-28 20:54:20+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. 

We do not use descriptive names, such as Ayatma Rope swing unless there is an actual sign with that name. Can you review this node? I'll send you more info on OSM in a message
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161837721
BurritoKing (2025-01-27 23:02:20+00:00): I don't think this is right, it extends into deerwood drive too much and I don't know how to cut it off at the top of that way.
aharvey (2025-01-28 02:05:24+00:00): FYI footpaths should also have the footway=sidewalk tag
silversurfer83 (2025-01-28 19:57:59+00:00): Moin :)

ich finde deine Arbeit gut und wichtig. Danke :)

Kleiner Hinweis, da es bei dieser Menge an Änderungen schnell mal passiert: Achte ein bisschen auf Dinge wie Grenzen und Stromleitungen und so. Diese bitte nicht mit anderen Sachen verbinden.

Falls du sowas verhindern willst, kannst du auch alle Objekttypen, die dich bei deiner Arbeit nur stören auch ausblenden. Dann kannst du nichts aus versehen damit verbinden.
Dafür in dem Menü rechts am Rand "Kartendaten" (Taste "U") und da dann den Abschnitt "Karten-Objekte" ansehen und zB Stromleitungen und Grenzen abwählen.

Weiter viel Spaß am grünen Sauerland und Grüße aus dem Waldecker Land
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161838178
quincylvania (2025-01-27 23:33:06+00:00): Lol sorry for making a huge bounding box. Blame relation/8907468 for crossing the antimedirian.
MarcoR (2025-01-29 16:24:22+00:00): Hi!
What is Gym Xxl? With just the name and nothing else that node is pointless :(

Happy mapping,
Marco.
user_21759646 (2025-01-28 11:57:09+00:00): Zamiast "upiększać", to lepiej uwagi pozamykaj.
Glassman (2025-01-28 20:51:21+00:00): reverted changeset. SEO just changed address but didn't move node.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161838521
joel56dt (2025-01-28 04:44:45+00:00): Is this location correct? It looks like an erroneous duplicate of the one added in changeset 161839639. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161839639#map=19/49.264441/-123.101801

Thanks,
Joel
dogsplshugme (2025-01-30 12:04:00+00:00): Hey there. 161839639 is the correct location. I thought closed changesets change nothing?
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-01-31 21:45:21+00:00): reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161993369
aharvey (2025-01-28 11:02:39+00:00): could probably even mark it as disused then with disused:highway=path per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix#Stages_of_decay
Fraxi (2025-01-28 10:34:51+00:00): Hey, why did you delete also the unduplicated nodes for atms? When I passed by the buildings before 4 days, I noticed that one of them certainly existed. Please, do at least a partial revert.
donovaly (2025-01-28 15:14:00+00:00): I was there on Friday, even in the UniCredit bank. Both bank offices have an ATM and the tag "atm" is for both offices set to "yes":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4980907524
and
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4991181112
thus adding an extra ATM would be doubled. The "rule" is to set the atm tag for the bank office to yes and then not having an extra node for the ATM. ATM as extra node only when there is no bank office that holds the ATM.
donovaly (2025-01-28 15:16:08+00:00): Maybe the Bulgarian community has another rule but for several other bank offices in Sofia it is already done the way I did it - only extra node for an ATM if it is not at a bank office.
Fraxi (2025-01-28 19:03:28+00:00): Thanks for your answer and clarification!
Dimitar155 (2025-01-29 14:18:19+00:00): I've reverted the ATM deletions. Mapping them separately allows to tag other properties which might be different from the bank office (such as whether they accept deposits, location, wheelchair access). In the future, just change atm=yes to atm=separate.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161899372
donovaly (2025-01-29 15:45:52+00:00): > I've reverted the ATM deletions.
So you are a decider, just do things without even expressing your arguments before you act. OSM is a community project, at least I thought so.
And as you are a decider, make decisions consistent. For example here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7076939339
there was no ATM mapped but there is one. According to your logic all bank offices must then have a separate ATM. You have the power to do this. I was 6 days in Sofia, saw not a single bank office without an ATM.
Dimitar155 (2025-01-29 16:10:55+00:00): > And as you are a decider, make decisions consistent. For example here:
osm.org/node/7076939339 

I can't add an ATM to a bank which I haven't visited in person. I don't know where exactly it is located. It is okay to have atm=yes when there isn't a separately mapped atm. What's not okay is to delete the atm because the bank has atm=yes.
SomeoneElse2 (2025-01-28 19:24:37+00:00): Hello,
I think this might have accidentally created a gap in the High Weald National Landscape relation 8815682  - I've filled it in in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161870811
Best Regards,
Andy
Vlad1122 (2025-01-29 01:18:14+00:00): You're right. Thanks a lot for the fix!
NeisBot (2025-01-28 02:00:37+00:00): Hi Tonyfarms, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 80% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 3 highway(s)
- 1 natural(s)
- 31 waterway(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=161840541
Taya_S (2025-01-28 06:45:04+00:00): Hello Tonyfarms,

Be aware that your changes are visible to everyone else.
I have reverted this changeset. Existent features such as the streams and railway you removed here should not be deleted.

The names you added in your other changesets (e.g The numbered farms and woods) will also have to be removed. On OSM we only use actual names for objects. 
You can read more about it in the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names

Happy mapping,
Taya Snijder
OSMF Data Working Group

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161845064
Taya_S (2025-01-28 15:52:09+00:00): I have removed the names as well in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161863092
joel56dt (2025-01-28 04:41:06+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

I reverted your changeset because you changed the entire school block to become a building by adding the tag building=school.

Thanks,
Joel
dogsplshugme (2025-01-30 12:02:43+00:00): Thank you. I am still learning so I might make mistakes.
Kovoschiz (2025-01-28 09:54:24+00:00): `=ferry_terminal` is already added on the `=pier` area. This is the `=berth` as `=stop_position` , reflecting the name used on the ferry routes.
mcliquid (2025-01-28 07:47:31+00:00): Hallo hlfan, hattest du den Beitrag bereits gesehen?
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/post-box-operator-bulk-update/124893
hlfan (2025-01-31 11:06:33+00:00): Irgendwann werde ich die Heading im RSS feed gelesen haben, aber hat mich da nicht so gestört. Das ist mir aber zwischenzeitlich ordentlich genug auf die Nerven gegangen, hab dann aber das Thema nicht mehr im Kopf gehabt.
Ich glaub damit hat sich das Beitragsproblem erledigt.
Stalker61 (2025-02-02 11:44:19+00:00): Если тяма нет не надо ломать дорожный граф и плодить изоляты
iandees (2025-02-01 23:01:56+00:00): Reverting the deletion of the Telemark Village Base Camp building.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162028931
iandees (2025-02-01 23:24:38+00:00): Howdy! Thanks for adding detail to the trails. Note that the area has changed pretty extensively recently and some of the Strava routes might not be accurate or up to date anymore. In particular, the "Base Camp" buildings were constructed since any available aerial imagery and should not be deleted.
Trail_Caretaker (2025-02-02 01:44:25+00:00): Ok, thanks for correcting my mistake. I looked at several other resources online and believed that the building was removed physically. I couldn’t find any proof that it was currently in existence.  I appreciate it.
iandees (2025-02-02 02:12:56+00:00): Yea, it's confusing because the Telemark Lodge building was dismantled a couple years ago and this new building was very recently built. See here: https://www.birkie.com/mtv/base-camp-lodge/
Trail_Caretaker (2025-02-02 02:23:55+00:00): Wow the new building looks great, very modern looking.
Trail_Caretaker (2025-02-02 02:26:42+00:00): Do you know the best way to mark a physical path that is used both for cross country skiing in the winter and is a regular path in the summer for bikes, running, and hiking?  Basically, the path is a Path, and a piste.
Baloo Uriza (2025-01-28 15:24:57+00:00): access=no means nobody can use that path.  access=private means you need permission to access that path.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161842448
mcliquid (2025-01-28 07:48:17+00:00): Hi and thank you for your contribution!

Please note for the future: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
berndw (2025-01-28 08:29:57+00:00): Hallo, willkommen bei OpenStreetMap

Vielen Dank für deine Beiträge zu den Daten, aber du hast um einen Review gebeten.

Ich habe eine Frage, ist das ein offizieller ausgeschilderter Trail oder etwas selbstgebautes?

Gibt es eine Quelle, wo man den Verlauf nachvollziehen kann?
Micha Rudolph (2025-01-28 10:39:23+00:00): Hallo,

ob der Trail offiziell ist kann ich nicht sagen.
Er besteht seit etwas über 2 Jahren, wird regelmässig gepfegt und auf grund des guten zustandes viel frequentiert.

Quelle ist meine eigene GPS aufzeichnung.

Grüße
berndw (2025-01-28 13:04:17+00:00): Bei einem nicht offiziellen Weg sollte auch ein informal=yes dran, ansonsten nutzt Kooot den zum Routen und als Vorschlag.

Nach den von Dir eingetragenen Daten ist das auch kein hw=track, sondern eher hw=path. Bei diesem braucht es auch keine Werte für motorcar, foot oder bicycle. Nur wenn eine Beschilderung vorhanden ist, wird das eingetragen.

Wenn es keine Beschilderung am Eingang gibt, ist auch oneway=yes falsch.

Die Regeln zum Befahren von Wegen mit Fahrzeugen in Wäldern ist nach dem Waldgesetz - ja, ich weiß, Spassverderber - genau geregelt und das sollte sich in den Daten widerspiegeln.

Das Gefälle gibt man in Pfeilrichtung mit incline=up oder down an.

Was du draus machst, ist deine Sache, von mir sind das nur Hinweise.
Micha Rudolph (2025-01-28 13:37:19+00:00): Vielen Dank für die Hinweise! Als Neuling bin ich auf guten Rat angewiesen.

Kann ich die Änderungen selbst anstossen?
berndw (2025-01-28 16:47:20+00:00): Ja, aber nicht nur anstossen, sondern machen.

Bei Fragen einfach hier antworten.
小智智 (2025-05-13 13:04:37+00:00): These CRS codes are all valid and in use, which should not be removed.
小智智 (2025-05-13 13:12:32+00:00): The bare ref= should contain the primary reference value as used by the operator itself. The CRS code should only be listed in ref= if it is actually a National Rail station, as London Underground or any other networks have their reference codes.