piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
BCNorwich (2024-12-10 19:28:34+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Your new residential area covers an existing residential area, somewhat, Thus I've removed it. If the existing area is Glenvale Estate then please tag the name there.

Regards Bernard.
silversurfer83 (2024-12-10 19:57:47+00:00): Moin

warum entfernst du den node? Ist dort nichts mehr, was auf das ehem. Restaurant hinweist? Oder steht dort weiterhin ein leeres Lokal, welches wieder genutzt werden könnte?

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160140753
surprisedatespot (2024-12-10 20:12:14+00:00): Guten tag,

This restaurant has been marked as closed for the past 5 years and it has no address tags, which is why I removed the node entirely rather than keeping the useful parts.

Feel free to revert this with the disused:amenity=restaurant tag if you prefer
silversurfer83 (2024-12-10 20:19:57+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160143148
silversurfer83 (2024-12-10 20:20:06+00:00): Thanks for the speedy reply.

I don't believe these to be valid reasons to delete this node without survey. Of there's signs hanging off the walls for years giving people waypoints to navigate by. Please do not delete these objects without checking that there's nothing left. Thank you.
trailschneck (2024-12-11 06:14:29+00:00): So langsam wirds kindisch.
Sick_Biker (2024-12-11 19:54:53+00:00): Ich denke, dass das ein guter Kompromiss ist, ich sehe da auch nichts kindisches, da auch ich mich darüber freue, wenn die Post bzw. die Ware die ich bestelle auch bei mir ankommt.
Viele Navigationsgeräte greifen auf openstreetmap zu, die von Speditionen bzw. deren Lieferfahrer genutzt werden.
Die Straße heißt laut Kataster "Auf der Hubbert", ist aber auch der Zugang zur Nelkenstraße 3, also alles korrekt.
Mir wurde damals von der Gemeinde gesagt, dass das die Nelkenstraße ist.
Stand auch so bei google maps.
Ich habe mir das erst nach ihrem Hinweis bezüglich des Geo Kataster genau angesehen.
Mittlerweile stehen auf google maps beide Namen und keiner kommt dadurch zu Schaden.
Es geht bei Navigationsgeräten um eine gute Orientierung und die ist mit der jetzigen Bezeichnung gegeben.
Ich werde mich mit der Gemeinde in Verbindung setzten, damit auch ein Hinweis angebracht wird, dass die Nelkenstraße 3 über die Straße "Auf der Hubbert" zu erreichen ist. 
Wie gesagt, auch ich möchte meine Pakete bekommen (;
Đuro Jiří (2024-12-21 20:54:19+00:00): Ciao jioele,
posso chiederti, se hai verificato personalmente queste due rotonde,se veramente esistono?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1341607250/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1340727861/history
Se no,quale quale fonte hai usato?
Grazie
jioele (2024-12-22 06:34:33+00:00): Certo ecco qui le fonti
https://voitg.net/2024/11/jesolo-riaperte-le-due-rotatorie-dal-ponte-cavetta
https://www.comune.jesolo.ve.it/novita/modifiche-viabilita-ponte-cavetta-per-realizzazione-rotatorie/
https://www.facebook.com/share/jnYWBf6ar7ZkHXaV/?mibextid=wwXIfr
vasony (2024-12-12 18:11:56+00:00): Szia!

Edison utca Thomas Edison utca?
A házakra hosszú névvel tetted rá, viszont az utcán rövid névvel van. Volt utcatábla esetleg?

Tamás
trial (2024-12-28 22:06:41+00:00): Attention, des la Route du Bois vous avez cassé la hiérarchie des voies. On ne passe pas d'une voirie secondaire à un voie de service.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-31 17:47:26+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12410031370/history has fixme:type = parking that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
Is it a parking for cars? (amenity=parking)
for bicycles? (amenity=bicycle_parking)
Something else?
jpc999 (2025-04-03 07:22:26+00:00): Hello : It is a parking area for cars (amenity=parking). rgds
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-18 10:41:58+00:00): retagged it then!
HeiKue (2025-06-25 19:48:41+00:00): Hallo Derkoenig, bin gerade darüber gestolpert, dass Du die Wege vor/hinter Bremenstaller Brücke zu highway=cycleway gemacht hast. In Kombi mit foot=designated ergibt das keinen Sinn und Josm meckert. Zudem sind Teile des westlichen Weges zur Vacher Straße Grundstückzufahrten. Sehe ich da was falsch? Hast den Weg mit seiner Beschilderung otg erkundet? Grüße, HeiKue
goedegazelle (2024-12-11 11:37:25+00:00): In plaats van de oprit te verwijderen is het beter om de weg te splitsen en de tags aan te passen:

highway=service
service=driveway

Op deze manier wordt voorkomen dat er gegevens verloren gaan.
ArjanJager (2024-12-25 14:27:39+00:00): Goed punt. Bedankt.
1stFrequency (2024-12-10 19:51:25+00:00): This is from local knowledge. Accidentally populated wrong source.
felipeeugenio (2024-12-10 22:04:55+00:00): Hola.
La Calle Ricardo Vial tiene claramente las veredas separadas de la calle, por lo que sidewalk=both está incorrecto. Estaba como separate antes y lo que corresponde en este caso es dibujar las veredas como highway=footway por separado.

Varias calles en Ñuñoa y Providencia están así.
saludos
me1kimu (2024-12-10 23:15:44+00:00): Gracias por el aviso. Agregué un par de senderos paralelos a Ricardo Vial en el conjunto 160147163
NeisBot (2025-02-08 08:06:13+00:00): Hi Céléon, thank you for your contribution to the OSM project.

Over your latest stretch of time, you've made at least 28 changesets with minimal or no meaningful comments.

To enhance collaboration, please consider using the comment field to describe your map changes. This helps others understand and follow your adjustments more easily. You can find guidance on good changeset comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 

Thanks!

I've also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
eggie (2024-12-11 10:23:07+00:00): Dag omit  Op dit adres was al Scouting Lord Baden-Powell gevestigd. Klopt dar nog wel? 

MVG
eggie
omit01 (2024-12-11 12:42:38+00:00): Hoi Eggie,

Ja, dat klopt. Het gebouw is in eigendom van Lord Baden-Powell en huurt dat een keer per week uit aan Kruikenstam. Waardoor er nu effectief twee scoutinggroepen in een gebouw zitten, met Lord Baden Powell als hoofdgebruiker, zeg maar.
eggie (2024-12-11 12:54:16+00:00): Ahhh  Oke... Ik zal de pois even uit elkaar zetten voor rendering. Helaas rendert scout nog niet dus heb er een gemeenschapsruimte bijgetagd.
Je ziet anders niets op de kaart.
MVG
eggie
PizzaTreeIsland (2024-12-10 20:32:39+00:00): Hello, 

Thank you for adding these buildings. Please make sure to make them have 90° angles. In the ID editor, you can hit the Q key when you have a building selected and it will automatically make it a rectangle. 
Thanks and happy mapping!
Dimitar155 (2024-12-26 16:22:31+00:00): Здравейте и добре дошли в OpenStreetMap!

Какъв е проблема с тази аптека? Вие сте втория човек, който я изтрива след като е била добавена.

Поздрави,
Митко
G_N_M (2024-12-26 16:54:54+00:00): Здравейте,

аптеката затвори преди повече от месец и преди две седмици изнесоха лекарствата. Също адреса е премаханат от сайта на Фрамар. 

поздрави, Георги
Dimitar155 (2024-12-26 21:25:48+00:00): В такъв случай е по-добре да го отбележите като вакантен. По този начин в бъдеще, когато някой мине оттам ще знае че там е имало нещо и може би вече има нов магазин.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160654160
eggie (2024-12-10 21:51:21+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback Het is me onduidelijk wat je hebt gedaan hier en wat je met 23 in je commentaar bedoelt.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-12-10 21:54:37+00:00): reverted by changeset #160145518
rskedgell (2025-08-21 11:19:04+00:00): Give way markings (two parallel rows of dashes) aren't crossing markings.
adamos (2024-12-11 07:05:17+00:00): Hello, you have deleted more than 2600 members from relation 8813834 - Flixbus line 189 from Berlin to Ulm. Was the line cancelled? If you did this edit by error, please revert your change. thank you.
silversurfer83 (2024-12-11 20:38:24+00:00): hi adamos

user Badabuga has yet to react to a single comment. 

So I'd say: revert if you believe most of this edit to be in error 

also: Badabuga: please react to comments
Yog Sot (2024-12-11 21:44:34+00:00): i kinda wondered what edits happen in the far lands so i looked just now and damn, you have got a mess there with cyclepathy.  Yeah, revert
adamos (2024-12-11 21:52:22+00:00): OK, reverted
opendcc (2024-12-11 09:36:01+00:00): Hallo,

grade1 und compacted widerspricht sich, ebenso Zeichen DE:240 und track.
uaamathon (2024-12-14 17:57:52+00:00): Salut opendcc 
habe im Grunde nur das Fixe-me beheben wollen. Die Lage stimmt.
Ein Pfad, wie vorher gemapt, war es für mich nicht. Grad 1 habe ich vorhin korrigiert. Die deutschen Schilder kenne ich zuwengig
Gruss uaa
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-04-06 08:29:53+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/195555268/history has dock = wet_dock that was added in this edit
what was meant by dock=wet_dock ? It is not documented at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Ddock - maybe it should be documented there, if this tagging is valid.

Is it about docks pernamently filled with water?
Canalsman (2026-04-06 20:21:16+00:00): This is a permanently flooded section of the old canal. It contains the remains of an old canal boat.

Is there a better tag or combination of tags to use?
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-04-09 12:38:11+00:00): historic=wreck and waterway=derelict canal objects?
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-04-09 12:38:19+00:00): waterway=derelict_canal
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-04-09 12:39:34+00:00): Or one of alternatives mentioned on that page, I guess

(sorry for three comments, hopefully I will not get an extra thought)
Branko Kokanovic (2024-12-10 21:24:18+00:00): revert https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160102086
kitsee (2024-12-11 16:35:04+00:00): this is incorrect. the road between tredegar and trefil should be tertiary not unclassified
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160145298
Nathan_A_RF (2024-12-11 16:38:29+00:00): It is a dead-end road, why should it be tertiary?
kitsee (2024-12-11 16:50:37+00:00): the definition of a tertiary is "Smaller through roads linking cities, towns or villages, or linking suburbs within built up areas". this is the primary road connecting Trefil to Tredegar and the rest of the road network
Nathan_A_RF (2024-12-11 17:23:06+00:00): I refer you to the second word of that definition.
eggie (2024-12-10 22:09:16+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedack   Zijn deze straten al opgeleverd?
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
neel783dz (2024-12-11 09:08:13+00:00): Yes. They are already constructed and residents are already moving in in the building (including me).
neel783dz (2024-12-11 09:09:11+00:00): Some finishing work has to be done this year but I think it would be good to add these streets.
eggie (2024-12-11 09:14:02+00:00): Oke.. In case a road is not finished you may add these as highway=construction construction=residential or....?
..name=........

Greetz,
eggie
neel783dz (2024-12-11 09:25:39+00:00): I see. Let me update them.
neel783dz (2024-12-11 09:28:26+00:00): Done.
gscholz (2024-12-24 09:32:24+00:00): Hi AlvaroRC,
this changeset has destroyed several boundary relations like "Centro", "Moncloa-Aravaca", "Argüelles" and "Palacio":

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-3.71048&lat=40.42376&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=160145461

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
AlvaroRC (2024-12-24 15:41:14+00:00): Hi Guido. 
I have fixed the relations. 
Kind regards
Álvaro
eggie (2024-12-10 22:12:02+00:00): Dad neel   In OSM voegen we geen adresgegevens aan de gebouwomtrek.
Ik zal deze weer verwijderen. Er zijn al adresnodes.

MVG
eggie
neel783dz (2024-12-11 09:06:15+00:00): Ok Thank you.
eggie (2024-12-10 22:35:44+00:00): De landuse=construction heb ik aangepast. 

MVG
eggie
neel783dz (2024-12-12 09:30:47+00:00): Thank you.
kitsee (2024-12-11 16:31:48+00:00): this change is incorrect, the roundabout is part of the duel carriage way and should be 70
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160145534
Nathan_A_RF (2024-12-11 16:38:02+00:00): Roundabouts are single circulatory carriageways, not a dual carriageway.
Nathaniel Taulbut (2024-12-11 17:28:36+00:00): The roundabout is part of a dual carriageway. It has the speed limit of the road it is part of. Practically, the NSL continues to be 70 on single carriageway sections of road where there is no oncoming traffic, like a roundabout or a slip road. So, this change is incorrect. If you were right here, you would have your work cut out for you changing it across the whole country.
Nathan_A_RF (2024-12-11 17:36:06+00:00): On slip roads that may be true, but for roundabouts no. Funnily enough I tried asking National Highways the other day about speed limits on slip roads (60 or 70) and they basically said "it's national speed limit" (i.e. no answer. I would presume the same for this case, so we can only go on common sense here, in that it's a single circular carriageway, not part of the dual carriageway.
Nathaniel Taulbut (2024-12-11 18:01:38+00:00): You say it's true for slip roads and not for roundabouts. Why? What's the difference? The only one I can think of is that a roundabout is circular.
Nathan_A_RF (2024-12-11 18:07:57+00:00): Because slip roads branch from a dual carriageway, a roundabout breaks it.
kitsee (2024-12-12 00:35:54+00:00): No matter where you stand on a roundabout there is always a carriage way heading in the opposite way to your right with a physical barrier separating you so a roundabout fits the definition of a duel carriageway better than a single carriageway with exception of mini roundabouts which i would except are single carriage ways and any road that forms a loop could be considered a so called circular carriageway. So is the M60 a single carriageway by your rules? It also make more common and practical sense. if you set every roundabout to 60 a satnav may start informing a driver that the speed limit has changed every time they end and leave a roundabout which is silly.
Nathaniel Taulbut (2024-12-12 01:06:52+00:00): That's a good way of thinking about it. At a tangent to you there is an opposite carriageway. Regardless, there is no debate about this. The consensus is crystal clear that the roundabout has the same speed limit as the road it is part of. So I have set the speed limit of the roundabout back to 70mph and change it from nsl_single to nsl_dual.
Nathan_A_RF (2024-12-12 10:41:59+00:00): What consensus is that? Can you point me to the discussion that agreed on roundabouts being 70 mph?
Nathaniel Taulbut (2024-12-12 13:20:43+00:00): One way the consensus can be revealed to you is by opening overpass turbo, having a look at the UK and running this query:

[out:json][timeout:25];
nwr["junction"="roundabout"]["maxspeed"="70 mph"]({{bbox}});
out geom;

Have a look around and observe the numerous roundabouts on dual carriageways, such as motorway junctions.
Nathan_A_RF (2024-12-12 13:27:35+00:00): That's not a consensus. There are plenty of roundabouts in similar situations marked at 60 mph too I could argue similarly. Worth noting that motorway roundabouts are legally 70 mph due to their motorway status.
yasslay (2024-12-12 13:48:48+00:00): If National Highways are being too vague about the actual speed limit of a roundabout (it isn't as if you'll reach the limit on one anyway) then I'd suggest that we should tag roundabouts as 60 mph where one or more of the arms are single carriageways (e.g. the A4102 here) and 70 mph where all of the arms are dual carriageway (e.g. M25 J2/Darenth Interchange). It might be better to do a blanket 60 mph rule per what Nathan_A_RF says to make it easier since the latter example is much rarer than the former example in the UK at least. Legal documentation or design guidelines would be very useful in this case as a way to determine how we should map it on OSM, which I think Nathan has alluded to here.
Nathaniel Taulbut (2024-12-12 14:45:53+00:00): All the discussion I have found on the internet indicates that roundabouts adopt the speed of their road, they do not "break" the dual carriageway, they are not their own "singular circulatory carriageway". So if a roundabout is not 70mph, it would be because it has arms with lower speed limits, not because of the reasoning Nathan put forth.
Nathan_A_RF (2024-12-12 16:43:16+00:00): What is this "discussion" though, and what do you class as "their" road? I do believe there needs to be discussions about this on the community forum as there is clearly no existing consensus on this, or at least not based on actual evidence.
kitsee (2024-12-12 17:41:22+00:00): Nathan can you point be to the public discussion you had before deciding to make these blanket decisions? personally, I see no benefit to declaring a roundabout to be separate from the road it sits on. it would be suicidal to attempt a roundabout at 60 or 70 mph. and there no official consensus since presumably it is common sense to say a roundabout adopts the speed limit of the road it sits on. the only difference is that the speed limit data becomes noisier and less appealing to consumers.
Nathan_A_RF (2024-12-12 19:14:58+00:00): I've asked on the SABRE forums before, and there was no consensus on 60 or 70, so I used my common sense of the roundabout being a single circulatory carriageway, therefore it's 60. If you want to settle this, I suggest again to make a discussion on the community forums, but I can't imagine it being correct for NSL roundabouts to be 60 or 70 simply depending on their connecting roads.
kitsee (2024-12-12 19:33:17+00:00): I have started a thread of the forums to discuss this issue more publicly https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/roundabout-speed-limits
kitsee (2024-12-12 00:48:56+00:00): Multiple junctions have had detail deleted here for no reason. the worst example us probably https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24384371
here you deleted 2 carriageways and 3 islands and replaced them with a single node. there is no reason to delete detail like this. there is no benefit. it is less accurate than before.
NieWnen (2025-01-20 14:11:19+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1341642790

To wygląda na podjazd. Takie tagujemy za pomocą highway=service service=driveway.

Proszę zwracaj uwagę na ostrzeżenia edytora.
Podjazd nie został podczepiony do drogi – z punktu widzenia sieci dróg w takim stanie jest bezużyteczny, bo nawigacja nim nie poprowadzi. 

Poprawiłem.
Res Saca (2025-08-18 20:04:56+00:00): Dziękuję za konstruktywną uwagę i informację. :-)
user_20523254 (2024-12-12 10:38:14+00:00): В мене адреси відображаються як "26 к1 корпус 1". Можна прибрати номера корпусів в addr:housenumber та замінити "корпус" на "к" в addr:unit, або прибрати тег addr:unit (хоча я його додала згідно https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:%D0%90%D0%B4%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%B8). Але я не знаю, що сталось з адресою "26 к6 корпус 3"
dzamper (2024-12-11 12:35:59+00:00): Czemu została usunięta nawrotka na rondzie? Autobusy nie mogą wyjeżdżać z dworca w lewo.
adamos (2024-12-11 13:38:18+00:00): dziękuję za informację, poprawione
dzamper (2024-12-11 15:34:26+00:00): Super, dzięki :)
SpinOff (2026-05-09 21:57:12+00:00): Przeniosłem wartość "Obwodnica Szwecji" z name do description.
NeisBot (2024-12-10 23:08:38+00:00): Hi brks, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 99% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 1 highway(s)
- 3 landuse(')

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=160147088
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-12-11 01:52:49+00:00): Reverted. Please don't delete features without source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160149492
NorthCrab_upload (2024-12-10 23:41:07+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2395149610
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/537002545

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Glassman (2024-12-12 01:14:25+00:00): Did you not understand my changeset comment about not adding parcel polygons as houses? Let me know how I can help.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-08 04:17:39+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164659535
NeisBot (2024-12-11 01:50:38+00:00): Hi German 1985, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 87% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
No primary map features!?

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=160149427
pitscheplatsch (2024-12-11 10:28:40+00:00): Thank you for your private message. 

The GPS trace you mentioned is not publicly available.
zuicz (2024-12-11 11:15:26+00:00): nie dodajemy zatok przystankowych jako osobnej linii, jeżeli nie jest ona fizycznie rozdzielona od głównej jezdni (vide Katowice AWF, Nowy Bytom Osiedle Kaufhaus)
pwbriggs (2025-09-13 03:06:48+00:00): Several months later, as a more experienced mapper, I now realize that this changeset was in error: micro-mapping of parking stalls is a real thing. Sorry!

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171857575
mavl (2025-05-13 15:07:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
ToniE (2024-12-11 10:25:04+00:00): Servus wyk,

ein kurzer Hinweis zu gtfs:ref_trips:VGN

'ref_trips' gibt es bei GTFS nicht.

'ref_trips' ist ein 'key', das vor GTFS in OSM definiert wurde im route-relationen zu identifizieren: z.B. 

- ref_trips="031"

wenn die route-relation der Linie (Spalte) '031' im Aushang-/PDF-Fahrplan der Linie entspricht.

- ref_trips="Mo-Fr 07:23; SH off"

wenn die route-relation dem Schulbus um 07:23 entspricht.

'ref_trips' ist also nicht unbedingt notwendig, wenn man GTFS-Daten hat.

Viele Grüße
Toni
Supaplex (2024-12-11 04:52:33+00:00): 木欄->木柵
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160153043
rhtb0 (2024-12-11 13:54:38+00:00): 서울;동탄;당진이 실제 표지판에 적혀 있습니까? 보통 그런 표지판에는 한 방향만 적혀 있고 복수의 지명은 적혀 있지 않습니다. 실제 표지판 그대로 표기하시고 임의에 지명을 넣지 마시기 바랍니다.
rhtb0 (2024-12-13 13:59:58+00:00): 고속도로 연결로의 방향 지명은 임의로 정하지 마시고 실제 표지판 그대로 적어주세요. 다 틀렸습니다.
rhtb0 (2024-12-13 14:01:48+00:00): 오성ic의 경우 세종;천안;아산, 수원;평택;오성IC으로 적으셨는데 실제 표지판에는 (17) 오성IC, 43 아산만 적혀 있습니다. 완전 틀렸습니다.
rhtb0 (2024-12-13 14:03:35+00:00): 실제 표지판에는 현덕분기점은 동탄이 위로 오고 봉담이 밑으로 갑니다. 따라서 지명을 임의로 적지 마시고 실제 표지판 지명대로 적어주시기 바랍니다. 저런 표지판에 지명이 3개씩이나 들어간 경우는 드뭅니다.
VLD549 (2025-01-19 12:09:22+00:00): Hi, I was asked to verify name changes. I believe the 'BV'  part should be tagged differently, and it shouldn't be in the name itself. The site doesn't show it this way either.
Perhaps I am wrong, but could you elaborate?

Thank you!
Udarian (2024-12-12 02:04:00+00:00): whats the source for this?