piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
MYYA_Mitchi (2024-11-04 06:11:09+00:00): #tt_event
tyfi (2024-10-17 05:16:38+00:00): I also used Bing imagery to see if they had solar panels.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:12:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
Kovoschiz (2024-10-17 10:58:09+00:00): Please don't Edit For Application. It's the responsibility of apps to handle controls, categories, and discoverability.
ObscureAngel (2024-10-17 10:18:51+00:00): Hello and thank you for your contribution !

Please note for the future: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to :
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping ! :-)
Udarian (2024-10-18 01:11:02+00:00): it seams like the changes made to the names of these countries translate to completely nonsensical things
jSeke (2024-10-18 02:57:34+00:00): ObscureAngel, my bad. I thought because they were pretty all at the same administrative level (i.e. national level) it would be acceptable to do them together. I'll know in future.
jSeke (2024-10-18 03:05:39+00:00): Udarian, if you're relying on DuckduckGo translate, I definitely wouldn't recommend getting opinionated about a language you dont speak. the letter combo AE doesnt exist in Gaelic, An Itiop is correct. I assume the spelling that was there was Irish. A' Ghraonlann had a wee typo with an i thats only there in the genetive. Slobhagia and Slobhinia are accepted names in Gaelic for those two countries but An t-Slòbhac and An t-Slòbhain is more natural and it was just odd to have one name in one form and one in the other
smeòrach (2024-10-20 17:08:05+00:00): A' Ghraonlainn, with the palatal final consonant, is the name for Greenland in Gaelic. see: https://www.tobarandualchais.co.uk/track/27588 . faclair beag often change these names in their database with no explanation because they think they're "wrong".
smeòrach (2024-10-20 17:08:53+00:00): sorry link should be https://www.tobarandualchais.co.uk/track/27588?l=gd
smeòrach (2024-10-20 17:21:43+00:00): the genitive is "na Graonlainne". both names are the same in Irish, in fact.

I'm not certain where "An Aetiòp" came from - it may be a borrowed spelling from Irish. My 1992 Bible calls it "Etiopia", with the genitive "na h-Etiopia". I would imagine this is used more in the language than "An Itiop", but I have never discussed Ethiopia in Gaelic before.

Even if you for some reason don't agree that these are the standard names in Gaelic, you should be adding them as alt_name since they clearly have currency in the language. Removing them entirely is borderline vandalism, especially if you are only doing it for matters of consistency, which is a useless metric. Many countries don't really have established names in Gaelic and may use several different ones - it is not for you or I to decide which one is the only one listed on this website.
HAmap (2024-10-17 10:04:13+00:00): Aha, war wohl nicht nach deinem Geschmack ;-)
Habe ich einen technischen Fehler mit dem Multipolygon gemacht? Oder findest du die Lösung (Wasserfläche Kanal und Wasserfläche Lände zu unterscheiden) nicht ok?

Die Abmessungen habe ich nach schlechtem Luftbild verschoben - das war Quatsch, danke für die Korrektur
WoSoe (2024-10-18 05:08:42+00:00): Moin!

Hab in erster Linie einen Multipolygonefehler behoben. Keine Ahnung warum iD das zulässt.

Hier wieder ein aktueller Fall:
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=11.86833&lat=48.91601&zoom=18&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.50&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways
HAmap (2024-11-07 16:25:58+00:00): Hallo WoSoe,
deinen Kommentar sehe ich jetzt erst. Ja, es ist für mich auch undurchsichtig, wie ich immer wieder solche Fehler einbaue. Hast du im zweiten Fall (Laber bei Dietfurt) den Fehler schon behoben?
HAmap (2024-11-07 16:30:29+00:00): Halt, sorry habe ich verwechselt: nicht Laber, sondern Kanalhafen Kelheim bzw. Anschlussstück an Altmühl und MDK - das war dein Hinweis. Hast du da den Fehler schon behoben, oder muss ich da noch mal drüber gehen?
MYYA_Mitchi (2024-11-04 06:11:07+00:00): #tt_event
MYYA_Mitchi (2024-11-04 06:10:53+00:00): #tt_event
MYYA_Mitchi (2024-11-04 06:07:32+00:00): #tt_event
Udarian (2024-10-18 00:54:30+00:00): next time can you please leave a better changeset comment, for m ore info see  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments . 
also after translating some of the names you added with the default duck duck go translator (I searched "translate to english") it seams like the names add are likely incorrect since I doubt that "West Harbour" is a good translation for "Atlantic Ocean". I may be missing something since I don't know the language but it seams based on the translation that at least some of these translations are incorrect.
jSeke (2024-10-18 03:14:11+00:00): I think youre missing quite a lot. If you don't know the language, why are you bothering to comment ignorantly that according to some little machine thats barely been trained on Gaelic, I am wrong. You dont seem to have considered that 'An Cuan Siar' might translate in English to ... (drum roll pls) Atlantic Ocean. It also doesnt seem to have crossed your mind that I'm not making these terms up and Gaelic might already have names for the world's oceans. Even if for whatever reason noone got through Cruinn-Eòlas in school without mentioning oceans, you would at leaste think theyd have a name for the ocean right next to them and if you're going to tell me any of them are wrong maybe dont pick the one the Gaels have been swimming in for centuries.

As for changeset comments, my appologies I forgot and I'll try remember more in future
Udarian (2024-10-18 20:24:51+00:00): I saw a world spanning commit so I  translated the changeset comment to see if it properly described what was in the commit and it wasn't so I left the comment about that and because from my experience when there are geographically large commits made by new contributors there's a high chance of the commits being vandalism so I translated some of the name changes to check. the changed names came out sus so I left a comment pointing out that there's possibly an issue here so that someone with more experience and knows the language can check them and see if they are vandalism. I just didn't call it vandalism from the get go since from other commits you seems to be mostly well intentioned so I left it implied. I was just tying to be nice about it, I always like to give others the benefit of the doubt on these things unless it is really clear what it is. it isn't ignorance to point out possible vandalism, the whole point of me pointing out that I don't know the language was to point out that there might be vandalism in this commit and other who know the language can fix any issues; ignorance would be me calling it vandalism without pointing out that I don't know the language. 
I was just flagging this commit so that others may look at it and check its contents who actuality know you language. also I didn't just use duck duck go, I used other translation services and they all spat out nonsense, if multiple translation services spit out nonsense then theirs a high chance of issues.
jSeke (2024-10-19 05:56:46+00:00): okay, fair enough. In future, I'll leave better changset commits and if you ever want to check anything Gaelic, no translation service speaks Gaelic at all so I'd recommend the dictionary Am Faclair Beag (faclair.com) for moste things and the database An Seotal (anseotal.org) for standardised terms used in Gaelic education
smeòrach (2024-10-20 17:39:38+00:00): hi, fluent Gaelic speaker here, I can confirm that "An Cuan Siar" means "The Western Ocean" and is the usual name for the Atlantic in Gaelic. Cuan in modern Gaelic means ocean (or a larger sea), but yes it was used for harbour archaically.
The Atlantic has other names such as "An Tabh" and "Na h-Abh", used in the Outer Hebrides, but they're not as widely used. "Atlantaig" is not used.

I've only heard Cuan nan Innseachan for the Indian Ocean, but both may well be in use
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:10:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:15:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:21:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:22:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
Bolt028 (2024-11-19 07:34:50+00:00): Hi, do you know if the road is still under construction or if it is open?
Artur | Yanosik (2024-11-20 09:13:21+00:00): Hi, road is still under construction. Official sources claim that roadworks will end at the end of November.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:15:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
user_18760664 (2024-10-17 09:58:17+00:00): no need to set name, otherwise ref does not show
eastender (2024-10-17 10:13:26+00:00): I agree. I’d prefer it if post boxes didn’t have names in OSM. This change was to reformat the name that a previous mapper had already set on the post box, to conform with the other mixed-case names that exist.

https://osm.mathmos.net/postboxes/osm-name.html
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:14:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
NorthCrab_upload (2024-10-17 07:00:52+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12257837522

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Mir76 (2024-10-27 04:26:20+00:00): Если дорога есть, но проезд по ней запрещен, то она должна быть нарисована, но на ней должен стоять тег access=private. Как и было сделано до вашей правки.
Mir76 (2024-10-27 10:12:24+00:00): Откатил правку
rab (2024-10-27 09:54:10+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1324617500

cemetery?
eggie (2024-10-17 08:35:38+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback  Realiseer je dat al je toevoegingen ook daadwerkelijk in OSM terecht komen.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-10-17 08:39:35+00:00): reverted by changeset #157997082

Voor wiki VR mapping zie: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Hulpdiensten
eggie (2024-10-17 08:48:11+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Demergency_access
fortera_au (2024-10-17 08:42:30+00:00): Is there a reason you've changed links to match the lower instead of the higher classification, as well as changing two links to normal roads?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157994101
mos_next_door (2024-10-17 11:56:03+00:00): Hi! Sevan was already tagged as water=lake, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/36956
This tag should not be used on linear nodes like water/land borders. I've reverted these edits.
Cheers
MarinoBM (2024-10-18 23:55:13+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157995159#map=10/41.4407/2.1794
silversurfer83 (2024-10-17 18:55:55+00:00): Moin General,

ich hatte dir am CS https://osm.org/changeset/145418209 schon einen Kommentar geschrieben und dich gebeten, Änderungskommentare zu verfassen, bevor du hochlädst. Die Bitte steht weiterhin.

Außerdem hatte ich dich dort auch etwas gefragt. Bitte antworte darauf. Danke.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157994159
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:12:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
MarinoBM (2024-10-18 23:53:54+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157995159#map=10/41.4407/2.1794
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:23:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
MarinoBM (2024-10-18 23:52:47+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157995159#map=10/41.4407/2.1794
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:17:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:11:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:19:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
MarinoBM (2024-10-18 23:57:27+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157995159#map=10/41.4407/2.1794
MarinoBM (2024-10-18 23:56:20+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157995159#map=10/41.4407/2.1794
MarinoBM (2024-10-18 23:51:07+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157995159#map=10/41.4407/2.1794
MarinoBM (2024-10-18 23:50:10+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157995159#map=10/41.4407/2.1794
bxl-forever (2024-10-17 09:27:40+00:00): Hello,

This changeset raises a few questions.

In the previous changeset, a user had explicitely marked the embankment as razed.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/901325687/history
On the latest aerial imagery it looks like the former infrastructure is gone, it is not immediately apparent why you are reintroducing man_made=dyke here.
Would you please explain?  Has the situation changed here recently?  Are you mapping after surveying the place yourself or working from other sources?

I also notice that you are doing a lot of various stuff, like adding a new restaurant or adding changing points for e-vehicles.  I must insist: please make sure to properly document your changes instead of hiding them under a vague "fixme" claim, which does not reflect what you are really doing on the map.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Looking forward to your reply, on this changeset page.  Thanks in advance.
FTstreet (2024-10-17 14:07:17+00:00): I unknowingly made a mistake here. My apologies. I had no bad intentions and was trying to help. I will not make any more changes.
FTstreet (2024-10-19 07:43:43+00:00): I went to the place to see if the dyke is still there. It's not. But they are changing the park completely. It has a large water basin in the middle. A pedestrian bridge and a play bridge over it. New planted trees and plants. Picnic tables and garbage bins. There are wires to install lights along the new made path. But the whole site is still under construction.
bxl-forever (2024-10-19 10:20:57+00:00): OK, thanks for the reply.
So, maybe you might want to remove the "dyke" tag if it’s not there.
Feel free to add the extra details you spotted there, it is interesting to have them on the map.  Flanders refreshes aerial imagery about once a year for each area, so probably in a few months there will be newer images that will make it easier to trace the water basin and spot the new objects.
For clarity, no-one is saying you should stop mapping at all, we merely requested to improve how you describe your work.
Have a nice day.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:23:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
eggie (2024-10-17 08:42:48+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
OvdLeur (2024-10-17 10:44:54+00:00): Hoi Eggie, 
Dankjewel voor het welkom bericht en de tips! 
Groeten, Oscar.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:17:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:21:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:20:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
MarinoBM (2024-10-18 23:48:43+00:00): Hello Kookykooky: in Spain there is an agreement for the treatment and labeling of EuroVelo routes.
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/rutas-eurovelo-en-espana/108020

Saludos.
Kookykooky (2024-10-20 10:08:26+00:00): Hi,
thanks for the information, but I still don't understand why Spain is special within the whole EV8 route and it is forbidden to have a "name" tag for this part, which is quite common for cycle routes. All the other parts of this route have a tag name and it seems pointless to me not to have a name for it in Spain. see e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16792749
Please enter a name for all parts of this cycle route. It is not nameless. The entire cycle route should be marked in the same way in all the countries it passes through.
Have a nice day
MarinoBM (2024-10-22 09:01:55+00:00): Hello Kookykooky: the EuroVelo routes that have been recently reviewed have included those raised in the OpenStreetMap Forum. It is not considered necessary to carry the name=* tag. In case of disagreement, this is the place to raise it.
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/proposal-creation-of-a-working-group-for-a-more-coherent-integration-of-eurovelo-routes-on-osm/106237
There are more routes that have been recently revised and also follow this scheme.
EV1 France
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4840307
EV6
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16494557#map=8/47.835/2.148
Saludos.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:13:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
lipuma (2024-10-17 11:46:54+00:00): Hey, ik zie dat je een BAG gebouw hebt omgetagd naar een residential landuse? Volgens mij is dit een ondergrondse parkeergarage. Kijk maar in de BAG viewer:
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/?searchQuery=0513100011152082&objectId=0513100011152082&theme=BRT+Achtergrond&geometry.x=108386.15299999999&geometry.y=448170.2195&zoomlevel=14.78973024108446&bijbehorendeAdressen=Pand

Omdat het waarschijnlijk 1 hele constructie is zijn de andere gebouwen erboven op niet apart in de BAG opgenomen. Daarom zijn deze ook waarschijnlijk getagd als building:part i.p.v een losstaand gebouw.
spughetti_tomtom (2024-10-17 12:04:33+00:00): Ah ik denk dat je gelijk hebt, zal ik de residential landuse omtaggen naar underground parking? Ik weet alleen niet waar ik dan de naam "De Riddervelden" neer zou moeten zetten. Misschien een place=neighborhood node?
lipuma (2024-10-17 12:13:33+00:00): Het hele complex van de 4 gebouwen + de ondergrondse parkeergarage heet De Riddervelden lees ik hier:
https://www.devriesverburg.nl/projecten/woningbouw/de-riddervelden

Misschien op een node ergens in het midden ja. Ik zou ook niet zo snel weten hoe je zo iets in kaart brengt.

Oh ja, dat gebouw way 1324623589 heeft twee building parts? Was dat er al?
spughetti_tomtom (2024-10-17 13:00:49+00:00): Yeah de building parts waren er al. Ik heb de parkeergarage inclusief de ingang omgetagd en een neighborhood node gemaakt. 😸

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158007230
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:20:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
citrula (2024-10-19 07:24:54+00:00): I have reverted this edit because you have added your name for an office that contains many different realtors.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158077628
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:17:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:10:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
eggie (2024-10-17 08:43:43+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community