piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Serpico (2025-12-01 05:37:03+00:00): effectivement, merci d'avoir attiré mon attention ,en particulier sur la taille, j'y serais attentif lors de mes futures contributions
Dimitar155 (2026-01-05 15:01:30+00:00): Честита Нова година!

node/11034611812 все още ли се намира в градинката?
Fraxi (2026-01-05 15:10:04+00:00): ЧНГ! Към днешна дата, наистина не мога да ти кажа. Ще го имам в предвид.
Fraxi (2026-01-06 15:21:39+00:00): Ахахахах. Уместно ти е питането... n13342463954 е всъщност n11034611812
Fraxi (2026-01-06 15:26:39+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176908105
Dimitar155 (2026-01-06 17:07:29+00:00): Благодаря за корекцията!
Luzandro (2025-12-08 09:52:13+00:00): Hallo,

ich habe den Fußweg korrigiert, sodass dieser mit der Germergasse verbunden ist und nicht mit der Grenze der Katastralgemeinden. Ist der Durchgang allerdings tatsächlich für alle frei benutzbar, oder nur für die Bewohner?

Bitte verwende name nur für tatsächliche Namen und keine Kommentare oder Adressinformationen, das habe ich entsprechend auf addr:unit geändert

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen#name_ist_nur_der_Name

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:addr:*
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175320747
lukavj (2026-01-05 02:09:45+00:00): Grüß Gott!

Danke dass Sie den Fußweg korrigiert haben. Der Durchgang laut meinen Informationen soll nur für Bewohner zugänglich sein, weil nach meinem letzten Besuch dort ein Aushängeschild mit "Nur für Anrainer" stand... für Post usw. und an und für sich ist der Durchgang weiterhin geöffnet, bzw. hat keine Objekte die jemanden daran behindern, den Weg durch die Martin-Mayer-Gasse und anschließend zur Germergasse zu nehmen.

Danke dass Sie mir dass nochmals geändert haben!
kitsee (2025-11-30 21:36:09+00:00): Hello Jazz,
Following on from yesterday's comment. Could you please take greater care when adding crossings. many of the crossings you've added a number of "Marked Crossings" that should be "Unmarked Crossings". marked crossing as used for zebra crossings where the road itself is marked. 

Please also take care not to add functional crossing like you've done in this changeset. a link footway described the situation accurately as it was.
ftcat (2025-12-01 08:47:51+00:00): Hi, thanks for editing in Lusaka/Zambia. While some of the roads you have re tagged as residential run through residential areas, such as Teagles Road, they are probably more accurately tagged as unclassified as they are more like 'connector' roads with residential roads running off them see the wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=residential?uselang=en-GB.

Also don't rely solely on Bing imagery as it is often out of date, switch between Bing and Esri to find the most up to date imagery.

Happy mapping
Frans S (2026-01-02 13:26:35+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping .
 * Buildings should be mapped without snapping their corners to other buildings and features such as roads and paths. This is a general rule when you map buildings.

Best regards
Frans S (2026-01-02 13:33:09+00:00): Hello. Another issue.
 * Please accurately outline all buildings.
You tend to map just a rectangle despite there  often being extensions. 
best regards
Frans S (2025-12-20 11:50:26+00:00): Welcome to the tasking manager and thanks for mapping buildings in this task. * Please accurately outline all buildings.
 * Buildings should have their corners squared.
 * Buildings should not overlap other buildings and features.

Keep on mapping!
NeisBot (2025-11-30 17:26:35+00:00): Hi Marv8125, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 93% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 10 natural(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=175323316
Marv8125 (2025-12-02 00:02:44+00:00): Hi, yes the deletions were intentional, I'm new to this and I might be trying to be to precise. I like how easy it is to get started.
Thanks for checking.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-11-30 20:42:33+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12105695732

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2025-11-30 20:42:39+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawną składnię. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres strony internetowej zawiera powtórzone protokoły.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13342935304

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2025-11-30 20:42:28+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13342943553

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Fizzie-DWG (2025-12-06 04:18:56+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19118
Sébastien Pi (2026-02-22 22:50:57+00:00): Bonjour Jean-Baptiste,

J’ai l’impression que cette note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5161318 parle d’une voie que vous avez ajouté : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1454954140

Vu les imageries utilisées, je suppose que vous ne connaissez pas le terrain (et donc ne pouvez pas traiter), n’est-ce pas ?

Merci
4004 (2026-01-29 13:45:21+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5146702#map=19/53.700017/23.830955&layers=N ?
Rico557 (2026-01-31 13:22:09+00:00): У этого дома должен был быть адрес Дубко-10, но что-то переиграли и после того как прикрепили аншлаг я адрес и сменил. В интернетах, на некоторых сайтах этот ньюсити до сих пор с этим "Дубковским" адресом. Можно эту точку удалить, а можно и подождать пока не построят реальный Дубко-10 где-нибудь рядом.
keyyushi (2025-12-01 18:42:20+00:00): Doğan Taşdelen Caddesi ile buluşan Diyap Ağa Caddesinin secondary olma nedeni nedir? 3 şeritli primary olan yolun yine aynı şekilde 3 şeritli devamı değil mi?

Ayrıca bulvarın üstündeki yol, kent rehberinde isimsiz. Oranın aynı isimde bulvar olduğu bilgisi nereden geliyor?
Supaplex (2025-12-12 15:57:14+00:00): こんにちは、melme110さん

街の真ん中に海のようなものを追加した理由を説明していただけますか？
Supaplex (2025-12-12 15:59:00+00:00): Block given: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19160

Please read and respond to the changeset discussion

Dennis Raylin Chen
Data Working Group
flohoff (2025-11-30 21:00:23+00:00): Moin,
du hast hier das access entfernt - aber der note das es gesperrt ist ist auf der Brücke noch drauf.

Was stimmt da jetzt?

Flo
chris66 (2025-12-03 08:32:00+00:00): Die Sperrung wird in Kürze aufgehoben wie heute auch im WDR berichtet wurde. Die Note sagt, "gesperrt bis Ende November", kann also entfernt werden.
dcskobuffs (2025-12-04 19:10:54+00:00): Hello joserrg12,

I noticed that La Ruta Nacional 35 was changed from primary to trunk, with the comment that it is part of a high-capacity network. While I understand the logic, the Costa Rica OSM Wiki indicates that national highways should generally be tagged as highway=primary, and La Ruta Nacional 35 is not listed among the designated trunk routes (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Costa_Rica#%22Red_Vial_Nacional_Primaria%22,%22Ruta_Nacional%22_(National_Primary_Roads). Were you aware of this highway classification guidance?

Thank you and looking forward to hearing from you.

Hola joserrg12,

He notado que la Ruta Nacional 35 se cambió de principal a troncal, con la mención de que forma parte de una red de alta capacidad. Si bien entiendo la lógica, la Wiki de OSM de Costa Rica indica que las carreteras nacionales generalmente deben etiquetarse como highway=primary, y la Ruta Nacional 35 no figura entre las rutas troncales designadas (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Costa_Rica#%22Red_Vial_Nacional_Primaria%22,%22Ruta_Nacional%22_(National_Primary_Roads). ¿Conocías esta guía de clasificación de carreteras?

Gracias y espero tu respuesta.
joserrg12 (2025-12-04 20:04:15+00:00): Hola, saludos. Sí, conozco muy bien las numeración, y jerarquización de rutas nacionales y también lo estipulado en la wiki (que debería revisarse y actualizarse cada cierto tiempo), Para este caso: el Corredor Norte: la "Punta sur" se está construyendo a cuatro carriles (Sifón de San Ramón a San Miguel de Naranjo), así como la "Punta Norte" ya se hizo (entre Quesada y Florencia de San Carlos) y así también el "tramo central" en algún día se terminará a 4 carriles (entre Sifón de San Ramón y Quesada de San Carlos), en Costa Rica eso es una autopista (trunk) , el resto del tramo (entre en entronque de la Vía 141 en Florencia de San Carlos hasta Las Tablillas en Los Chiles (frontera con Nicaragua) tiene mejores condiciones de rodaje y geográficas, incluso, que la Interamericana norte en el tramo entre San Isidro de El Guarco y San Isidro de El General de Pérez Zeledón y condiciones iguales o mejores que el Corredor Noratlántico (Ya que la RN4 tiene hasta tramos sin asfalto, como el sector entre Birmania de Upala y Santa Cecilia de La Cruz), por todo eso se considera la RN35 como una "Autopista" o para el caso una ruta primaria.
joserrg12 (2025-12-04 20:05:40+00:00): *Interamenricana Sur
dcskobuffs (2025-12-08 21:08:17+00:00): Thank you for the information you provided. I will defer to your knowledge on this.

Gracias por la información que me proporcionaste. Confío en tus conocimientos sobre este tema.
StC (2025-12-03 15:40:11+00:00): Bonjour,
ce changeset  a brisé la continuité d'itinéraires pédestres qui passent par là. Je m'occupe de la réparation.
Frans S (2025-12-30 15:48:05+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
Please square each building you map by clicking the Q key while the object is still selected.

Best regards
limes11 (2025-11-30 18:07:45+00:00): Moin,

meinst du 

shop=pet_grooming ?

Ein shop=hairdresser ist nur für Menschen gedacht.

Viele Grüße
limes11 (2026-01-16 21:54:48+00:00): Hallo,

mit der Bitte um Antwort.

Viele Grüße
limes11 (2026-02-10 07:28:11+00:00): Hallo ?!
真中あお (2026-07-02 16:35:26+00:00): 您好，感谢您为osm做出贡献~不过您的这笔编辑存在一些问题：其一，osm有“一个事物对应一个地图元素”的惯例，因此“陶港”这个地名作为村庄标记为一个点以后，就无需再在居民区上标记了。其二， name=* 标签应该填写且只填写该地名在当地标准的书面语中的写法，而不应该括注其他内容。想用国际音标记录准确发音，osm有个 name:pronunciation=* 标签来实现。因此我将上述问题按格式修正了
tordans (2025-12-14 08:12:50+00:00): Hi LienusRob, diese Änderung ist ungewöhnlich. Der generelle Access ist „destination“. Warum überschreibst du dass für ein paar Verkehrsmittel auf ein generelles „ja“? Ist hier eine Durchfahrt möglich oder so?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175324817
Something B (2025-12-13 15:41:37+00:00): Hi, Hovastro!
Please don't use natural=* with multiple values, such as natural=coastline;bare_rock. Do map bare rock, gravel, sand or other such areas as separate elements, otherwise islets will not be renderered.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1109932008
Best regards,
Something B.
TrickyFoxy (2026-01-01 12:00:55+00:00): Они случайно не через улицу? Там как раз три свежих здания, а тут на спутнике пусто
eggie (2025-11-30 22:01:22+00:00): Dag Mappiga,
Je vraagt feedback. Wanneer het traject geschikt is voor bv landbouwvoertuigen dan is highway=track terecht. dan wel het tracktype=grade?  toevoegen.
Bij gras meestal 5
Wanneer het smal is dan highway=path gebruiken.
Ik heb de aansluiting in lijn gebracht met de BGT.
MVG
eggie
Dawid2849 (2026-06-09 11:08:03+00:00): https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/zablakany-opp-na-a8/144446
Yunkers (2025-11-30 19:23:01+00:00): Ale fajna wojna edycyjna :)
Yunkers (2025-11-30 19:47:01+00:00): Zmianę oczywiście wycofuję jako przeprowadzoną niezgodnie z zasadami revertowania. Po więcej informacji i dyskusje zapraszam pod moja poprzednią zmianę.
pavvv (2025-11-30 20:53:33+00:00): Jakie to są zasady revertowania? Nigdy o takich nie słyszałem.
Yunkers (2025-11-30 23:59:24+00:00): To nie revertuj jeśli nie umiesz. Możesz dać znać na forum żeby zrobili to za ciebie.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Change_rollback
Dawid2849 (2025-11-30 20:58:23+00:00): Twoja edycja jest niezgodna z KSNG.
Dawid2849 (2025-11-30 21:01:37+00:00): Poszło zgłoszenie do DWG, niech oni się tym zajmują
Dawid2849 (2025-11-30 21:05:34+00:00): > Twoja edycja jest niezgodna z KSNG.

Oraz ze stanem obecnym. W Ukrainie nie ma województw, nie ma nazw sprzed wojny jak "plac Krakowski", ulic "Kazimierza Wielkiego". Takie nazwy dodawaj sobie do old_name:pl
Dawid2849 (2025-11-30 21:09:23+00:00): Fajnie tak używać revertera, ale nie odpowiadać na komentarze pod Twoimi edycjami
Dawid2849 (2025-11-30 21:27:16+00:00): A, przepraszam. Wycofałeś moją edycję, która była wycofaniem innego użytkownika 🙃
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-01 13:17:29+00:00): reverted adding historical names as currently used - for example see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/150812648/history - "plac Krakowski" is no longer its name

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175357445
Pullaski (2025-11-30 18:40:54+00:00): Correction: Addition of sidewalk along western side of Falls Road.
eggie (2025-11-30 22:05:27+00:00): Dag Mappigator,

Het is een losliggend pad. Dus dit kan prima. Ik heb wel het pad losgemaakt van de landuse=grass
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=175326144

Linker alttoets gebruiken tijdens intekenen voorkomt plakken.
MVG
eggie
j numminen (2026-03-08 08:14:26+00:00): I shall remove the service way you added. Esri World Imagery is quite current and shows hatched markings where that supposed highway=service is. The road markings show that the paved median is not meant to be crossed in that fashion.
Langlaeufer (2025-12-01 10:41:12+00:00): Bist du dir sicher mit den Bürgersteigen in der verkehrsberuhigten Zone? Eine vbZ ist eigentlich ein gemeinsam genutzter Bereich. Die Fußwege hinter den Parkplätzen kann ich ja verstehen, aber z.B. den hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1454969652
osmmapper222 (2025-12-01 20:41:20+00:00): Den von dir verlinkten Weg habe ich nach erneutem Betrachten der Luftbilder entfernt. 

Insbesondere habe ich die Parkmöglichkeiten kartiert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175375366
Langlaeufer (2025-12-01 20:56:55+00:00): 👍
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-05 17:19:48+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11406930242/history has app_operated = yes that was added in this edit
What app_operated=yes means here? Have you wanted to mark that you can control it with app in some way but app may be necessary or not? For example shop where you can scan and pay with app, without going through a traditional line. Or is it for objects where you need an app to use them at all? Then maybe app_operated=only would be better?

Note, this key seems undocumented on wiki, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Key:app_operated and
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-05 17:22:52+00:00): welp, this page actually exists now, I forgot to check it and I forgot that I tried to document it (feel free to check its correctness!)

sorry for last sentence being wrong
MelancholicSlav (2026-01-29 23:44:53+00:00): I have reverted this changeset. According to the Wiki, highway=pedestrian is meant for use on pedestrianized roads, which the reverted ways are not.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177869646
GerdP (2025-11-30 22:30:41+00:00): Moin! 
Die Änderung hat eine Lücke in der Knotenpunkt-Route erzeugt. Habe die geschlossen mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175333804
Bitte schau noch mal drüber.
Maturi0n (2025-12-01 14:48:23+00:00): This is vandalism and violates on the ground truth. OSM shall be politically neutral.
Oleg_MD (2025-12-01 16:34:25+00:00): Could you be more specific before accusing of vandalism? What exactly you do not like in my edits? The names in Romanian of villages in the Republic of Moldova? This is the true on the ground, in documents, in written and oral communication, this is the reality.
Ltrlg (2025-11-30 19:15:02+00:00): comment ~= entre Valmy et Verdun
trial (2025-11-30 22:01:02+00:00): Je confirme, le problème est bien corrigé.
Roy88 (2025-11-30 19:17:01+00:00): See: https://www.ah.nl/winkel/1176
eggie (2025-11-30 21:20:41+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Roy88 (2025-11-30 21:26:40+00:00): Dankjewel, ook voor de welkommail met uitleg.
Glassman (2025-12-02 01:16:21+00:00): #TIP: street names are spelled out in OSM because software has a hard time with abbreviations. But the rest looks great. I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175327787
sbodapati (2025-12-13 17:01:34+00:00): Thanks for the tip. Looks like someone else already bet me to fixing it. Will keep this in mind for the future.
ftrebien (2025-11-30 19:30:46+00:00): E também 2020-04-19
user_5359 (2025-11-30 20:57:45+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the two nodea  more than 100 meters over streets and buildings. Additional you add only a name node (nota address, no business description, no contact information).
I have now reverted your changes.

If you need more information (and cannot find any examples or ask anyone else), please visit our wiki at https://wiki.osm.org.
Pikse (2025-12-08 19:32:44+00:00): Is there a particular reason why you readded subareas to county relation? 

As per relation type documentation[1] these are not really needed, and also, if subcategories are collected then it seems to be forgotten that relations are not categories[2].

I considered updating the list of subareas here along with updating particular subarea relations, but due to aforesaid reasons, and also to make future updates easier I ended up removing subareas instead.

I see some other counties in Estonia (not all) also have subareas set, and so maybe you wanted to make things more consistent. I suggest that we should rather drop subareas for other counties that currently have these, the way it is done for some for admin entities in some other countries.

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:boundary
[2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations_are_not_categories
muralito (2025-11-30 21:30:22+00:00): No es una villa, pero el nombre es "Villa Los Nolitos".
muralito (2025-11-30 21:30:08+00:00): No es una villa, pero el nombre es "Villa Hadita".
muralito (2025-11-30 21:29:55+00:00): No es una villa, pero el nombre es "Villa San Felipe".
muralito (2025-11-30 21:29:42+00:00): No es una villa, pero el nombre es "Villa San Jose".
Aethonatic (2025-12-03 13:02:23+00:00): Hey Jens, are you aware of the current situation involving Nottingham City Airport whose runways you've retagged as being in use? News outlets have consistently reported this place as having been closed.
Aethonatic (2025-12-10 18:58:45+00:00): It's been a week and no response yet. I've gone ahead and reverted these changes in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175772976.
Jens Korth at airport-information dot com (2025-12-12 11:50:39+00:00): Hi,
sorry for the delay.
In the official pilot ifnormation from NATS UK (eAIP) the runways are still listed ?!
This is published a valid from 25 December (!) 2025
https://www.aurora.nats.co.uk/htmlAIP/Publications/2025-12-25-AIRAC/html/index-en-GB.html
Aethonatic (2025-12-12 20:15:08+00:00): See 075/2025 in the PDFs linked on the website you sent, it reports that Nottingham City Airport is unavailable to fixed-wing aircraft, consistent with reports of it closing. I don't know why the runways are still being listed.
user_5359 (2025-11-30 20:48:30+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/152408983 more than 100 meters over streets and buildings. 
I moved the node back to the original position.
Dawid2849 (2025-11-30 21:35:10+00:00): Widziałem go i zapomniałem zmienić 🙃
grozsa11 (2025-11-30 22:56:29+00:00): There are concrete wall separated lines from 2025 aug about. Would you undo the unseparation, please. 

osm.org/edit#map=19/45.000169/24.596842

See on latest streetview photos:

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=44.999749916520614&lng=24.596585761246047&z=19.145418526717926&pKey=1413537909934675&focus=photo
DressyPear4 (2025-12-16 18:19:57+00:00): Não vandalize o mapa
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175330410
gscholz (2025-12-02 10:21:25+00:00): Hallo civ2mapper,
diese Änderung hat die beiden Relationen "Erlebnis-Zoo Hannover" und "Meyers Hof" zerstört:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=9.77089&lat=52.38119&zoom=17&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=175330804

Kannst du das bitte reparieren?
Beste Grüße
Guido
civ2mapper (2025-12-09 20:52:19+00:00): habe ich gefixed. Danke für den Hinweis.
gscholz (2025-12-10 06:26:28+00:00): Danke für deine Rückmeldung.
Guido
Frans S (2025-12-01 13:35:21+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please map only required objects. Buildings and highways.
Best regards
grozsa11 (2025-11-30 23:10:14+00:00): Thanks a lot for the lot of corrections and additions. 
The separation here and all around the area (you talked me in p.m.) I made is estabilished. I was there, and there are streetview photos from august 2025, 
forexample: 
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=45.0165133&lng=24.5456667&z=17.91834141522384&pKey=1434377097849604&focus=photo

The next curves (osm.org/edit#map=19/45.000169/24.596842) :
 https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=45.00048581515&lng=24.596358826407027&z=18.23494278508137&pKey=2302422176855130&focus=photo&x=0.4848164770765919&y=0.6725664335279091&zoom=0

Will this be okay? Thanks , Gza
NorthCrab_upload (2025-11-30 21:01:06+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13343293752

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
redd (2025-11-30 23:12:08+00:00): danke für die Erfassung!
redd (2025-11-30 23:26:21+00:00): Hi qugeb,
mir ist aufgefallen, dass du in Obertheres zwar Gebäude erfasst hast, aber die alten Grünflächen nicht angepasst hast. 

siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/50.017501/10.442489

In so einem Fall wäre es besser entweder die Flächen anzupassen oder den Hinweis offen zu lassen.

Ich öffne daher die 2 betroffenen Hinweise noch einmal:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5062516
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5062517

Grüße,
redd
m@rio (2026-03-08 20:33:36+00:00): Cześć spam46200,
prośba o wycofanie tej zmiany - paczkomat DHL w tym miejscu istnieje. Strona DHL nie jest demonem aktualności.
pzdr, m@rio
spam46200 (2026-03-09 08:02:36+00:00): Na pewno jest to DHL a nie DPD? było app_operated=only, co nijak nie pasuje do automatów DHL, wszystkie które widziałem miały duży ekran i możliwość odbioru z jego użyciem. Z kolei DPD (szara, wysoka i wąska szafa) kiedyś miały możliwość otwarcia tylko z aplikacji, teraz zazwyczaj są już dołożone klawiaturki. Dodatkowo DPD jest w tym miejscu na stronie: https://www.dpd.com/pl/pl/dpd-pickup/znajdz-punkt-dpd-pickup/
m@rio (2026-03-09 17:47:41+00:00): Na pewno. DHL - po remoncie Biedronki - jest przesunięty bliżej wejścia. Obok - tam gdzie poprzednio DHL - stoi DPD.
spam46200 (2026-03-09 19:56:18+00:00): Poprawiłem zgodnie z tym co piszesz, dzięki za zwrócenie uwagi.