piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
waldhans (2023-06-29 13:57:39+00:00): “Bitte suche den Konsens mit anderen regionalen Mappern” Ich bin seit 10 Jahren aktives Mitglied der lokalen Community (OSM-Stammtisch Viersen und Umgebung) und keiner dieser Mapper war jemals bei diesem Stammtisch. Wenn sie also so Konsens süchtig sind, verweise Sie doch auf den Stammtisch.

Konsens in der lokalen Community ist allerdings, dass Radwege getrennt von den Straßen eingetragen werden. Also keine Tags auf die Straßen, sondern den Radweg eintragen. Weiters war Konsens, dass keine defaults getaggt werden. 

Und wenn dann auf der Straße der Tag „cycleway:both = no“ gesetzt ist, obwohl parallel ein Radweg läuft, der sogar Teil einer Radroutenrelation ist, dann ist der Tag in meinen Augen ein Fehler.

Teilweise den Eindruck, dass irgendwelche Tags ziemlich wahllos über ein Gebiet eingetragen werden, ohne Kontrolle und unvollständig. Kann man ja mit einer Overpass-Abfrage schnell feststellen.

Dass ich Information gerne als POI auf node erfasse, stimmt. Hier folge ich einer alten OSM-Regel eine Funktion ein Objekt. Falls sich also in einem Grundstück eine Feuerwache und eine Rettungsstelle befinden, tagge ich 2 Nodes. Falls dann irgendein  Armchair mapper eine davon auf die Fläche kopiert, erlaube ich mir die Wiederherstellung das POI's. Damit vermeide ich das Problem Amenity inside Amenity.
Oberhaupt fällt mir auf, dass kaum neue Information eingetragen werden, sondern viele Mapper nur Information umverteilen. Oder eben Tags hinzufügen, die eigentlich sinnlos sind. Niemand erwartet bei einem Feldweg parallel laufende Radwege. Trotzdem wird cycleway:both = no eingetragen und dann gejammert, wenn ich das lösche. Wie gesagt, mappe die Radwege! 

"das nicht alles, was von den gängigen QA-Tools als "Fehler" markiert ist, auch einer ist! "Falls dir Fehler in den Tools auffallen, kontaktiere doch die Autoren. Ich hatte manchmal Glück und die Fehler wurden behoben. Natürlich muss man aufpassen, aber eine Kombination "lanes:backward=2  lanes:forward=1  lanes=4" ist für mich erkennbar falsch. 

Soweit mal für heute. Mfg Kurt
kogutowicz-mano (2023-07-20 12:52:13+00:00): Szia!
"Öltöző"??? Azt hiszem nem jól használod a name=* taget. Ez a kategória neve, amibe az objektum tartozik. Ezt az információt viszont már tartalmazza az amenity=dressing_room attribútum.
bkil (2023-07-20 14:02:08+00:00): Köszönjük az értékes hozzászólást, ezektől mindig jobb lesz a térkép a nap végén.
Jordi MF (2023-06-26 23:06:44+00:00): Hola AntoniRel,
Si la séquia que va paral·lela a tot el camí del Barranquet no es la "Séquia de Sant Vicent", saps com s'anomena?
Xvtn (2023-06-26 17:56:49+00:00): These are mostly on forest service land, right? I was under the impression that most FS land is at least accessible by foot or horseback. Or does the pipeline have something to do with it?
Oregonian3 (2023-06-26 18:55:56+00:00): Hi Xvtn. Forest lands come in two varieties: those where the land is actually owned by the USFS, and those where the land is considered part of the national forest but actually owned by someone else. 
https://www.fs.usda.gov/ivm/ is a map that shows all these boundaries. The darkest colors are the wilderness areas (e.g. the Wellsville Mountains), the next darkest shade is the lands owned by the USFS, and the lighter shade is lands considered part of the forst but not owned by the USFS.

Anything in land owned by the USFS is public unless designated otherwise. However, this is not the case on the lands that are part the forest but privately owned. I've been using a combination of the USFS map, streetview imagery, satellite imagery, and local knowledge in making these determinations.

Hope this helps, let me know if you have any questions.
Xvtn (2023-06-26 21:38:42+00:00): Got it. Thanks for the detailed explanation! I had no idea such huge swaths of technically USFS-included land were privately owned. I knew there are some public rights-of-way through private chunks, but didn't know the scale of it.
Xvtn (2023-06-26 21:40:50+00:00): For my own use of that ivm resource in the future, is there some way to know on there whether a road is publicly accessible or private access only? Or maybe local knowledge, street-level images, etc. are required too like you say...
Oregonian3 (2023-06-26 22:15:40+00:00): Pretty much any road or trail that appears on the USFS map there is going to be a public road. The roads that are shown as x'ed out lines are all closed to motor vehicles but depending on the circumstance may or may not be open to other uses like hiking.

But yeah, for roads that are not on the map in the areas that are not owned by the USFS, local knowledge and imagery are the only ways to know.
Jordi MF (2023-06-26 23:09:06+00:00): Si esta és la Séquia de la Morra, com s'hauria dhauria d'anomenar la que està justament al nord amb un nom similar (Séquia del Morro)?
Gràcies per millorar les dades d'OpenStreetMap.

Salutacions,
Jordi
Mex (2023-06-28 08:59:43+00:00): What is this round way you have added? This doesn't seem to match the satellite images.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137802810
Tomas_J (2024-07-08 13:37:01+00:00): Ahoj.  Pozri, prosím , na diskusiu tu (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153665942#map=14/48.3538/18.1555). Preberá sa tam jeden chodník na ktorý si dával access=no.
Colbertson (2023-06-28 20:18:52+00:00): Kāpēc izdzēsāt šo ceļa gabalu?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1185582593
rskedgell (2023-06-27 07:39:27+00:00): Removing highway=residential from Calle Los Alpes ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/146994337 ) stops it functioning as a road for display and routing purposes. This is probably not what you intended to achieve.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-07-19 00:05:37+00:00): addresses shouldn't be added to roads
Tatfahren (2023-06-26 18:43:57+00:00): Hallo und willkommen zurück bei OSM.
Hier noch eine kleine Ergänzung zu deiner Änderung, die sieht soweit gut aus. Jetzt kannst du noch ein detached aus dem house machen, da es freistehend ist. Damit wird das genauer definiert. Ein building=house teilt sich die wand mit einem anderen. Außerdem solltest du beachten das die meisten Maßangaben mit einem Punkt statt Komma geschrieben werden. Dann wünsche ich noch viel Spaß bei deinen weiteren Änderungen.

Tatfahren.
Tatfahren (2023-06-26 19:01:32+00:00): Achja, und das Carport erhält bitte keine eigene Adresse, eigentlich bezieht sich die Adresse auf das Grundstück, es ist jedoch gängige Arbeitsweise diese in den Gebäudeumriss des Wohn oder Geschäftshaus zu setzen. In teilen Freitals ist es außerdem üblich die Adresse zusammen mit entrance=main in den Haupteingang zu setzen.
NVBW_Seifert (2024-03-17 15:29:41+00:00): Hallo dieterdreist,

Du hast in diesem Changeset den Aufzug zu Bahnsteg 5/6 als deaktiviert durch setzen von disused:highway=elevator.

Laut DB Fasta-API ist der Aufzug aktuell in Betrieb.

Wurde der im letzten Jahr erneuert oder aus welchem anderen Grund hast Du den letztes Jahr deaktiviert?
dieterdreist-CAI (2024-03-18 12:31:04+00:00): ob er erneuert wurde weiß ich nicht, aber als ich dort war konnte man ihn nicht benutzen, ausser Betrieb. Habe ich damals vor Ort festgestellt. M.E. sollte man nicht der API trauen sondern vor Ort nachsehen, ob der Aufzug jetzt wieder funktioniert, was ja gut sein kann. Mein Zug ist damals auch wegen Personalmangel ausgefallen (kein Witz), daher war das doppelt nervig weil ich daher den Weg auch wieder zurück musste mit schwerem Reisegepäck.
dieterdreist (2024-03-18 12:31:44+00:00): sorry, vom falschen Account geantwortet
Colbertson (2023-06-26 18:50:29+00:00): Lūdzu augšupielādē izmaiņas mazliet retāk, droši var pievienot vairāk kā dažus objektus vienā changeset. Vieglāk sekot līdzi vēsturei un izlabot ja viss nav tik smalki sadalīts.
Dodko (2023-07-02 12:01:36+00:00): Do značky name sa píše len skutočný názov objektu a nie opis čo to je.
Futbalové ihrisko už vyjadrujú značky
leisure=playground
sport=soccer
Nomadmapper (2023-06-27 06:08:42+00:00): Bonjour,
2 petites choses:
- il manque le tag sport=swimming
- Dans description, mettre en minuscule et rester factuel (donc ne pas mettre "attention..." .

merci
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137804970
Colbertson (2023-06-26 19:03:32+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtertiary
Leo Slager (2023-06-26 22:40:16+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
felipeeugenio (2023-06-26 22:10:21+00:00): Hola. Borró el barrio Malloco.

ya no existe?
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137805526
Gbialos (2023-06-27 16:01:07+00:00): Recuerdo hace años colocar ese pin de referencia con el nombre Malloco, solo por el hecho de que en ese sector es la calle más conocida después de la Avenida Bernardo O'Higgins. Pero no existe ningún barrio, villa o población con el nombre Malloco. Estoy averiguando si la población que corresponde al perímetro luego de Chilectra al noroeste, y Pequeña Industria al sur, lleva por nombre Monte Patria.
felipeeugenio (2023-06-27 16:26:24+00:00): Ok. muchas gracias por su tiempo.
saludos
UT93 (2025-10-15 15:41:18+00:00): Das ist gut, dass du alle Wege selbst besichtigt hast. Dabei sollte dir aber auch aufgefallen sein, dass am Punkt https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/316769420 ein Verbotsschild in der Form eines allgemeinen Fahrverbots aufgestellt ist. Daher finde ich, ist das von dir vergebene Attribut "bicycle=yes" auf dem Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28811753 wohl eher unangebracht.
Bächli (2025-10-15 17:58:55+00:00): Danke für die Diskussion. Das allgemeine Verbotsschild ist weiter weg von der Hauptstrasse Richtung West. Die Verzweigung Richtung Autostrasse, Rettungszufahrt. Auch auf Swisstopo sieht man kein roten Punkt. Dieser zeigt ein allgemeines Fahrverbot. Wie kommen Sie darauf das da ein Fahrverbot steht? Aus Google aus dem 2014? Das ist schon längst weg. Ich werde in den nächsten 2 Wochen nochmals besichtigen und Fotos machen.
Colbertson (2023-06-26 19:07:30+00:00): Ļoti lūdzu augšupielādē vairākus objektus vienā changeset. Varbūt vienu detalizējot šo apli, citu pievienojot visus gājēju celiņus un citu kokiem apkartnē.
Tad visiem būti vieglāk izsekot līdzi kas notiek un izlabot iespējamas kļūdas.
VigilantPenguin (2023-06-26 19:07:38+00:00): May want to reroute the Interurban Trail relation to use this ramp rather than the crosswalks, not sure what the more accepted route is.
BCNorwich (2023-06-27 06:44:14+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've joined/connected your new path to the path that it crosses. because routers would not recognize the interconnection.

Regards Bernard.
wille (2023-06-27 12:44:18+00:00): Hi Marcos! Parque Carvalho is not in the list of suburbs of Salvador. https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subdivis%C3%B5es_de_Salvador
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137806359
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2023-06-27 14:49:55+00:00): Olá wille,

fiz essa edição durante a correção do nome da via. Essa indicação junto ao nome da rua é incorreta e cria vários problemas para os usuários do OSM. Pelo nome imaginei que seria um nome de bairro que ainda não consta na lista.
Qual sua sugestão para tratar esse problema? Excluir totalmente a informação ou lançar com alguma outra tag?
wille (2023-06-27 14:56:12+00:00): A prefeitura de Salvador fez uma revisão dos bairros há uns anos. Você pode o ponto para ser neighbourhood.
Self-Perfection (2023-07-03 13:59:32+00:00): Здравствуйте.

А что собственно вы исправили в этой правке? Кажется ничего не изменилось
Jose Luis Infante (2023-07-05 09:01:44+00:00): Gracias por mapear las vías peatonales de Can Ruti. Son muy necesarias.

Solamente decirte que procures no borrar elementos que no deban borrarse, ya que se pierde información y se pierde el histórico del elemento. Por ejemplo, en esta edición se pierde la información del pavimento táctil en algunos pasos de peatones. Ya lo estoy solucionando.

Por otra parte, el borrado de la vía de parking es correcto puesto que ya no existe.

De nuevo gracias y te animo a seguir mapeando por la zona.

Un saludo!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137806479
wermak (2025-01-12 18:15:43+00:00): Hallo Peter, 

die Adressen lauten hier auf Hammerhütte,  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/332675534/history. 
Baasemer Mühle als Adresse existiert nicht. Woher kommen deine Informationen? 

Schöne Grüße
NRWPeter (2025-01-12 18:40:46+00:00): Hallo, es steht so dran, an der Einfahrt zum Haus.
MfG
Langlaeufer (2023-06-27 02:13:01+00:00): Hallo Tracker,
was du eingezeichnet hast sind die Haltestellen (Plattform) die Stopp-Positionen gehören auf die Straßenlinie und waren aber schon da.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137807119
Pousada Raiz Parque (2023-06-26 20:17:24+00:00): a pousada raiz parque nao eh aqui. marquei errado.
zstadler (2025-04-24 05:53:41+00:00): FYI, in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165347496 a user has deleted https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1185121904 "בריכת העמודים"  that you added in this edit.

I started a discussion on that changeset.
wille (2023-06-27 12:42:27+00:00): Hi Marcos. "João de Barro 1" is not in the list of suburbs of Salvador: https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subdivis%C3%B5es_de_Salvador
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137807499
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2023-06-27 14:50:40+00:00): Olá wille,

fiz essa edição durante a correção do nome da via. Essa indicação junto ao nome da rua é incorreta e cria vários problemas para os usuários do OSM. Pelo nome imaginei que seria um nome de bairro que ainda não consta na lista.
Qual sua sugestão para tratar esse problema? Excluir totalmente a informação ou lançar com alguma outra tag?
emersonveenstra (2023-06-27 00:56:14+00:00): Hi,

In OSM, we don't need to name everything, especially when the name is a description of the object. Could you please go back through and remove the names like "Pond" and "Farmer's Field"? Thanks!
ChristopherGS (2024-04-04 21:55:58+00:00): Hello, thank you for contributing to OSM. Please don't name a building "To be determined", this is not what the "name" field is for. If you know the name of the restaurant, you can use that, otherwise remove it and add it when you do know.
treestryder (2024-09-17 21:54:45+00:00): Found this standing in a parking lot here now. Trying to map an EV charger. I'll delete the restaurant.
LockOnGuy (2023-06-26 22:03:10+00:00): A user commented about a change I made in this changeset regarding removing name tags, you can see the discussion in changeset 137809656. Regards.
literan (2023-06-27 18:23:37+00:00): crossing=uncontrolled|traffic_signals ставится на точку пешеходного перехода обычно, а не на линию дороги (это свойство перехода, а не дороги)
ڕاستی (2023-06-26 21:47:04+00:00): Who told you that you can put Arabic names to name tag. Bro there a tag could name:ar and if you want to add Arabic names use this tag not put Arabic anywhere you want!!!!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137808065
LockOnGuy (2023-06-26 21:52:46+00:00): Hello, Arabic is an official language of Kurdistan region [1], And the language that 95% of Iraqi speaks, I added it not just for that but it's the language I'm familiar with, if you want me to add names in other languages that I don't speak that would be impossible unless you want some gibberish text.      

[1] https://archive.gov.krd/dfr/dfr.gov.krd/p/p9728.html#:~:text=Language-,The%20Kurdistan%20Region%E2%80%99s%20official%20languages%20for%20government%20purposes%20are%20Kurdish%20and%20Arabic.,-The%20two%20most    

   
Regards
ڕاستی (2023-06-26 22:06:31+00:00): First show some respect. Then who told you that not add Arabic names under name:ar tag I'm talking about main name tag that you are not allowed add Arabic names. If you do that again I will report what you doing.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137808065
LockOnGuy (2023-06-26 22:18:18+00:00): Hi,     
You said "First show some respect." Can you please describe or explain how was I unrespectful?      
And you said "about main name tag that you are not allowed add Arabic names." who said it's not allowed? where? Arabic is an official language  of the country and an official language of the Kurdistan region as I sent you above the official link that say so. Also, you want me to add 'name' tags in Kurdish, how can I add it if I don't speak it and can not write it? for example, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/443813415/history you can see here I added the correct names and did not add the kurdish as it was not available in history, and even if I search wikipedia for the person who the street was named after him https://ar.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D8%B9%D9%88%D9%86%D9%8A_%D9%8A%D9%88%D8%B3%D9%81 , the wiki is only in Arabic and there is no Kurdish wiki so I can take the name of him to add in name:ckb.          
And about the "#REVIEWED_BAD" thing, you just keep spamming them without understanding which is absolutely wrong and you shall not misuse the feature as if you do so, it might cover actual bad changeset in the osmcha history of the person, so it will be harder for people to see the actual bad edits.     
About the "If you do that again I will report what you doing." Please don't wase the DWG time with this, try to communicate first, try to understand, maybe discuss this with the local community (@osm_iraq on telegram), and if nothing help maybe contact them if you thing you're in the right.       
Regards.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-07-11 05:13:22+00:00): Reverted by DWG for vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138361665
GinaroZ (2023-06-27 20:54:26+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11008697004 guest_house= isn't a top level tag, would tourism=hostel be better?
FDOT_Ryan (2023-06-26 20:57:48+00:00): Open as of 6/22 per Wekiva Parkway website and email to FDOT
SE_PA_ (2023-06-27 01:10:23+00:00): Need to split road as it has an intermittent turn lane
FDOT_Ryan (2023-06-26 21:03:57+00:00): Ramp permanently gone replaced with new 55C reflected on map
4004 (2023-06-27 19:53:33+00:00): здравствуйте, спасибо за правку.
возможно, вам пригодятся снимки в мапиллари, хоть они и старые https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=159042342760459
gezelick (2023-06-27 20:27:38+00:00): спасибо большое!
mike140 (2023-06-27 06:58:21+00:00): А для чого цей зв'язок?: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16019156. Взагалі рекомендую для ознайомлення: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:Buses
impiaaa (2023-06-27 00:15:48+00:00): "This tag should not be used for the infields of baseball or softball fields (a form of tagging for the renderer) - use surface=dirt instead." - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dsand
Black_Diamond (2023-06-27 05:13:14+00:00): Actually it is already surface=dirt, just like SF Giants stadium too. Most other baseball fields don't mark the infield area. It made sense to mark the area as sand, since it's not like the hard clay dirt that you see in a typical field. It's easier to slide on without little rocks tearing into your clothing.
impiaaa (2023-06-27 06:33:53+00:00): It is tagged surface=dirt, and it should not be tagged natural=sand. Neither should SF Giants stadium.
ڕاستی (2023-06-26 21:39:53+00:00): Hi why you removed Kurdish name (name tag) to 
Arabic name and deleted CKB name?
Changset: 137807761
On June 26, 2023 11:13 PM
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137809656
LockOnGuy (2023-06-26 21:45:50+00:00): Hello, Can you specify what way/node/relation are you talking about? as I did not change or remove any name in this changeset.     
Regards.
ڕاستی (2023-06-26 21:50:49+00:00): Really look at this changeset I mentioned above (137807761)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137809656
LockOnGuy (2023-06-26 21:56:08+00:00): You mean in WAY: 443813415?     
Yes name:ckb and name:ku have "Shqlawa street" in their name that's why I deleted them because the official name of the way is "Auni Yousif Street" which is written in a blue sign in the street that I surveyed.        
Also, please next time, comment on the affected changeset, not other changeset, and I see that you "reviewed_bad" it which is absolutely wrong: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137807761/     
Regards.
ڕاستی (2023-06-26 22:01:31+00:00): So why you do not corrected Kurdish names. What you did add Arabic names. Can you explain why?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137809656
LockOnGuy (2023-06-26 22:06:29+00:00): "So why you do not corrected Kurdish names." because I don't speak Kurdish, I can read it as it share the same alphabet with Arabic, a language I'm familiar with, but can't speak Kurdish or type with it, therefore the wrong name shall be removed, unless you want me to change it to something grammarly or entirely wrong.          
Regards.
SomeoneElse (2024-01-25 20:35:43+00:00): Hello,
What was the "lat/lon experiment with Bus Stop"?
Best Regards,
Andy
lucious (2023-06-27 06:36:26+00:00): j'essaye de le faire cet après midi.
mueschel (2023-07-01 14:22:56+00:00): Hi,
could you explain the meaning of the new access tags on some these ways?
E.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/892945339/history

I think it might be favorable to use the common "traffic_sign" tag to explicitly state which signs are present.
kubahahaha (2023-07-01 16:20:24+00:00): Hi. Traffic signs are not consistent here. I based at comments from this note
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3034089

I verified in the field.  the answer is: it's complicated.
 The only sign between ul.  Pliszczyńska and the viewing platform in Łysakowo is "C-16a / 13a - horizontal - End of pedestrian and cyclist traffic" which stands in front of the buildings with No. 17 (coming from Lublin).
 There are no other signs (also on the other side), car barriers, etc. The road is normally used by agricultural vehicles (I passed a tractor).
 I don't know how to mark it, I stopped at improving the surface.

If you believe individual signs should be mapped, I'll take a look at that and try to do it, however I rarely use this scheme.
Warin61 (2023-06-27 10:42:10+00:00): Hi,
This changeset was partially reverted to restore admin boundaries of Darwin Harbour, The Gardens and Larrakeya. These are sourced for Government data .. not imagery.
Aleksandar Matejevic (2024-04-15 11:44:56+00:00): Hi adas, 
can you fix Barzowice admin_level=8 relation, it is not closed polygon, since you have created Rusinowo and Wicie you might know the correct borders?
JJIglesias (2023-06-27 02:46:45+00:00): Saludos #YouthMappers No es un comentario valido, para eso tienes los hashtags donde colocarlo, es Preferible q coloques a que se refirio tu cambio.
Gracias por todas tus contribuciones
JJ
JJIglesias (2023-06-27 02:48:07+00:00): Yo usualmente al modificar cursos de agua, pongo este valor en mis comentarios: #RiosyLagosBolivia
gscscnd (2023-06-27 06:38:13+00:00): Jeżeli nie ma tam oznakowania określającego komu (jakim środkiem transportu) wolno się tam poruszać, to tagi bicycle, foot, horse, motor_vehicle są zbędne.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions

check_date najbezpieczniej w formacie YYYY-MM-DD.
gscscnd (2023-06-27 06:30:03+00:00): Połączenia ścieżki z obszarami landuse, natural itp. są zbędne.
mueschel (2023-07-01 14:27:57+00:00): Hi,
I noticed that you're adding monoglian names to many objects. Could you check the spelling of keys? I found many keys like with wrong spelling like these:
namr
name-mn-Cyrl
nam:mn:Cyrl

I fixed several, but I might have missed some.
gscscnd (2023-06-27 06:28:59+00:00): Przywróciłem część drogi widoczną na ortofoto:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137819744
gscscnd (2023-06-27 06:25:11+00:00): start_date najbezpieczniej w formacie YYYY-MM-DD.