piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
dadavid (2025-11-30 22:27:44+00:00): Hi :) Kann das motor_vehicle=no dann nicht weg? :) Oder ist die Straße noch nicht befahrbar? 

VG David :)
user_10799485 (2025-12-01 04:10:46+00:00): @David welche Straße meinen Sie? Die neue Querverbindung von der Holländischen Straße zur Flugplatzstraße ist doch Frei. Wenn Sie die Wilhelmsthaler Straße K46 meinen? Das weiß ich nicht, ob die wieder frei ist.
dadavid (2025-12-01 09:53:21+00:00): Hallo, vielen Dank für die Rückmeldung. Ja, ich meinte die K46 / Wilhelmsthaler Str. 

Gut möglich, dass da noch gesperrt ist. 

Vielen Dank und weiterhin viel Spaß beim Mappen :) 

David
user_10799485 (2025-12-01 14:33:34+00:00): Der Abschnitt zwischen Hollendischer Straße und Heckenweg ist wieder frei. Dafür soll ab Heckenweg in Richtung Ortsausgang gesperrt sein.. Ob das aber noch der Fall ist muß vor Ort Jemand prüfen. Denn die Meldung ist auch schon wieder über 2 Monate alt. https://www.calden.de/aktuelles/news/baumassnahme-wilhelmsthaler-strasse-aufhebung-der-vollsperrung-zwischen-hollaendische-strasse-und-heckenweg/
eggie (2025-09-01 20:31:04+00:00): Dag ealphm,

Wat wel is gebeurd. Je hebt zowel het bos als het water in meedere relatiedelen van een mp opgedeeld. Ik denk dat de editor iD dat heeft gedaan omdat je de polygoon onderbrak. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-09-01 20:35:37+00:00): De  mp's heb ik verwijderd en de polygonen weer gesloten.

MVG
eggie
ralphm (2025-09-02 15:03:21+00:00): Dank. Kan dat in iD?
eggie (2025-09-02 15:15:14+00:00): Yep... Dat doet die editor kennelijk automatisch. Het zou anders niet meer renderen. Het was geen ramp. 
Je zou eens kunnen kijken naar editor JOSM. 

editor josm stap voor stap
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/editor-josm-stap-voor-stap/75047

Die heeft die fratsen nie.

Mapse
eggie
ralphm (2025-09-03 11:15:05+00:00): Bedankt voor de tip!
MatiDX (2025-09-01 15:54:12+00:00): Zrobiłem drobną korekcję ciągu i zmieniłem z ścieżki rowerowej na ciąg pieszo-rowerowy
NieWnen (2025-09-02 19:19:31+00:00): Ok, 2 kolejne uwagi:

1. Jeśli chodzi o ten przejazd i przejście pieszo-rowerowe, to akurat węzły `highway=crossing` powinny być na przecięciach z jezdniami tak jak były. Z dodaniem na nich `bicycle=yes` .

Co do linii, to możesz dorzucić `path=crossing`, bo znajduje się `crossing=*` (albo wybrać szablon przejazdu pieszo-rowerowego, o ile taki znajdziesz).

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13112649479 – taki węzeł jest nieprawidłowy.

2. Niestety przybyło w tej zmianie nakładających się dróg

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1426423320 ta ścieżka nakłada się na tą: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/301039067
To błąd. Należy je podzielić/odlepić od siebie.
MatiDX (2025-09-03 10:51:17+00:00): co do pierwszego punktu, to mam zastrzeżenia, bo tam są przejścia dla pieszych, ale bez przejazdu dla rowerów
MatiDX (2025-09-03 11:11:38+00:00): Zmieniłem węzeł na kawałek ścieżki jako przejście dla pieszych
Barroszt (2025-09-01 16:38:00+00:00): Przepraszam za opis, po prostu ktoś mi się wdarł, poprawny opis to: nowe adresy okolice Włocławka i poprawa geometrii dróg
NorthCrab_upload (2025-09-01 18:31:42+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/908530594

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Luca Moiana (2025-10-16 08:09:27+00:00): Buongiorno, a prescindere dalla praticabilità del guado, perché è stato cancellato il sentiero? Se esiste un sentiero andrebbe lasciato e indicato nelle note del guado stesso le caratteristiche cha hai segnalato adesso in note
dawide10 (2025-10-16 15:56:43+00:00): Il guado non era un oggetto modificabile/cancellabile; in mappa c'era solo una sua icona rasterizzata. L'unica cosa cancellabile era il breve segmento del sentiero. Peraltro, lo stesso sentiero era pressoché impraticabile.
Luca Moiana (2025-10-16 16:59:22+00:00): A mio avviso il sentiero andrebbe lasciato perché era stato mappato
Andrea Musuruane (2025-09-02 07:26:52+00:00): Ciao. Per favore, non spostare i numeri civici dagli accessi per metterli dentro agli edifici. Non e' corretto. Inoltre, non aggiungere incline=0%. E' ridondante e occupa solo inutilmente memoria. access=private vale per tutti (pedoni, veicoli, cavalli, ecc). Non serve poi specificare bicycle, foot, motor_vehicle, ecc. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171323878
drolbr (2025-09-01 16:28:20+00:00): Neuer Radweg entlang Blombacher Bach über die Brücke ist noch nicht eingezeichnet, da die logisch unmögliche Beschildung noch auf community.osm.org geklärt werden sollte.
demon_box (2025-09-02 07:00:43+00:00): Ciao Cevin1992, ti segnalo che in Italia il civico identifica il punto di accesso (entrata) e NON l'intero edificio. Infatti un edificio può avere più entrate e di conseguenza più numeri civici. 
Quindi hai 2 opzioni: 
1. Se conosci esattamente la posizione (entrata) del civico che stai mappando metti tutti i tags dell'indirizzo su un nodo del perimetro dell'edificio (aggiungendo anche il tag entrance sullo stesso nodo);
2. Se invece non hai questa informazione così precisa devi mettere tutti i tags dell'indirizzo su nodo adiacente ma STACCATO dal poligono dell'edificio.
Ho già proceduto con le correzioni del caso. 
Grazie e BuonMapping!
hatul (2025-10-12 13:15:48+00:00): שלום דניאל

רצתי שם לפני כמה ימים וראיתי שהסינגל הוא תערובת של סינגל פיראטי, דרכי עפר ועקבות מטושטשים של אופניים. לא שביל מסודר ולדעתי לא נכון לסמן אותו בתור סינגל ממש. בטח שיש חלקים שכבר מסומנים בתור שביל אחר.
אני מציע לעשות קצת סדר ולהשאיר רק את השבילים הרציניים.
danielza (2025-10-17 12:25:44+00:00): היי,
מקובל, אנסה להגיע לזה בהמשך השבוע
hatul (2025-10-19 10:46:21+00:00): מצוין, תודה. אחכה לתיקונים שלך.
user_5359 (2025-09-02 13:46:57+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2b19. What is the mean of the tags
A1C_BPS = 53
A1C_SIAK = 53
A1N_BPS = Nusa Tenggara Timur
A1N_SIAK = Nusa Tenggara Timur
A2C_BPS = 5313
A2C_SIAK = 5310
A2N_BPS = Manggarai
A2N_SIAK = Manggarai
A3C_BPS = 5313140
A3C_SIAK = 5310111
A3N_BPS = Reok
A3N_SIAK = Reok
A4C_BPS = 5313140014
A4C_SIAK = 5310111020
A4N_BPS = Wangkung
A4N_SIAK = Wangkung
A4T_SIAK = Kelurahan
fid = 55091
? Is the source legal?
Đuro Jiří (2025-09-13 21:33:45+00:00): Posso conoscere motivo della rimozione dei boschi?
whb (2025-09-05 21:34:30+00:00): Guten Tag,

Eiei war schon eingetragen:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12407471319/history

Perkeo ist wieder geöffnet:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/332585393/history
user_5359 (2025-09-01 18:50:09+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please set for every business a separate node inside of the building.
AndyB_66 (2025-09-01 19:37:37+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
woodpeck (2025-09-01 23:11:53+00:00): Dear CPAP Matt, please do not mis-use the "name" tag. It is not intended to record information about license plates and I have no idea what "5TDGBRCH4MS037831" supposed to mean. Your changeset comment "added info" certainly does not explain what you were trying to do here.
ednzxt (2026-03-05 07:54:34+00:00): Добрый день. Подскажите, пожалуйста, зачем здесь тег access=private? Чтобы набрать воду нужно разрешение или доступ закрытую территорию, а потом еще деньги платить? Или достаточно заплатить деньги? 59,5323893, 30,8935229
Andrei Lazarev (2026-03-05 09:13:57+00:00): Конкретно по Тосно: Водоканал решил, что будет правильно монетизировать колонки в городе, убрал с колонок рычаги (ручки) и стал их продавать физлицам по месячной подписке. Приходишь со своим ключом (рычагом), вставляешь в колонку, накачиваешь воду, вытаскиваешь рычаг и уходишь. Я тогда знатно офигел от этого, когда узнал (сам здесь же живу). Больше я такого в других городах, посёлках и сёлах не встречал.
Myazyk (2025-09-02 18:36:27+00:00): Хлопче, повидаляй поля (farmland) з подвір'їв (обість)
Shyshka (2025-09-03 16:43:11+00:00): Я бачив, що ви використовуєте allotments, але хіба це не для дачних ділянок? Садівничі товариства використовують цей тег
felipeeugenio (2025-09-01 18:26:22+00:00): ok, por favor acordarse de revisarlo en 60 días.

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171327361
aceman444 (2025-09-18 16:16:18+00:00): Zdravim a ten vcelar tam ma pracovnu a da sa ho nastivit? Alebo je to len ul?
ticho2 (2025-09-18 17:28:50+00:00): Ano, je tam taky maly domcek (zakresleny v mape), a na zvysku pozemku je rozostavanych niekolko ulov. A na brane je cedulka ktora hovori nieco ako pozor, vcely, sukromny pozemok.
ticho2 (2025-09-18 17:29:53+00:00): Ci sa ho da navstivit, to neviem, myslim ze tam nie je vylepeny ziadny oznam s kontaktnymi udajmi ci otvaracimi hodinami. Proste je to sukromne.
aceman444 (2025-09-21 19:35:11+00:00): Pytam sa preto, ze ci ma potom zmysel znacit to ako remeselnika vcelara? Ak sa neda k nemu ist, ci kupit med, a je to len jeho konicek, potom si nemyslim, ze to patri do mapy. Samozrejme ule sa zakreslit daju, pozrite man_made=beehive.
ticho2 (2025-09-22 13:39:07+00:00): Nemam na to nejaky silny nazor. Len behavam okolo, vsimol som si tie ule aj tabulku, a prislo mi ako dobry napad dat to do mapy.

Ale mozem to prerobit aj tak, ze ta budova bude len anonymna budova, a popridavam tam ako POI zopar ulov. Len sa tadial musim niekedy zase vybrat, a asi si to nafotit, nech tie ule aspon dam ako tak presne.
bigopenmac (2025-10-15 16:35:23+00:00): Можешт испарвить пожалуйста почтовые ящики
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13112793494
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13086769477

имеют одинаковый ref:belpost = 1345
Кірыла (2025-10-16 08:01:59+00:00): Поправил.
oiooio (2025-09-03 10:55:38+00:00): Hi Gino-52,

du hast in diesem CS den Way #1245257595 vollständig als tunnel=culvert markiert, das ist doch bestimmt nur bei Überschneidungen mit anderen Wegen der Fall, oder?

Gruß
oiooio
Gino-52 (2025-09-03 12:00:57+00:00): Das war natürlich ein Fehler.
Hab's korrigiert.
Danke für den Hinweis
Gruß
Gino-52
NorthCrab_upload (2025-09-01 18:31:40+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.

"Jagiełła":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/533156053
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/533156054
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1002357138
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1002357161
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1002357170

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Jrachi (2025-09-02 07:45:47+00:00): Ciao,
Mi spieghi, con parole semplici e traducibili, perchè hai cancellato un sentiero , che è parte di un percorso a catasto nazionale?
Non lo hai visto sulle foto aeree?
Ivo
Vl-Sher (2025-09-02 10:04:24+00:00): Ci sono stato meno di un mese fa, il sentiero non è visibile, ho visto un segnavia coperto dalla vernice. Ciononostante ho provato a seguire questo sentiero usando il mio GPS e non ho visto alcun segnavia o altri segni di sentiero esistente.
Inoltre, c'è un ghiaione piuttosto pericoloso prima della mini sella che sconsiglio di attraversare.
C'è anche un sentiero alternativo ben segnalato (direzione sud verso Plan Mait, a est dal primo cartello e a sinistra al primo bivio).
Vl-Sher (2025-09-02 10:06:02+00:00): Nemmeno io riesco a vedere questo percorso su nessuna foto aerea (Google, ESRI). Potresti inviarmi un esempio?
Vl-Sher (2025-09-02 10:09:26+00:00): Ecco la mia vera traccia lungo il sentiero:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1SfgvDp6vPSOQV7VcTpAJk6cQKBOWsEkY/view?usp=drive_link
Vl-Sher (2025-09-02 10:12:34+00:00): La mia opinione è che il sentiero dovrebbe essere cancellato finché non verrà nuovamente segnalato, poiché ora in realtà non esiste più e seguirlo può portare a un incidente sul ghiaione.
Jrachi (2025-09-02 11:04:19+00:00): Il problema ha un'importanza giuridica.
Il catasto regionale ha inserito quel sentiero come parte di un percorso.
Per utilizzare il percorso alternativo, che passa su terreno privato, richiede una concessione scritta da parte del proprietario e avvallo del comune e/o unione di comuni...
Se il problema è che andrebbe ripassata la bollatura possiamo andare quando vuoi, io porto la vernice, tu porta i pennelli (per vernice acrilica larghezza 30 mm)

Ivo
Jrachi (2025-09-02 11:12:24+00:00): Altro problema è cancellare un sentiero quando OSM ha dei tag per indicare la visibilità e/o pericolosità.
Cancellare solo perchè si ritiene il sentiero pericoloso è sbagliato!

Ivo
Vl-Sher (2025-09-02 11:51:35+00:00): Non vedo alcuna restrizione sulla privacy per il percorso alternativo https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/520214820#map=18/44.711063/7.073367.
Ho visto molte persone seguirlo e dubito fortemente che abbiano tutti un permesso scritto.
Il problema non è la mancanza di segnaletica (purtroppo non posso unirmi a voi perché non sono in Europa), ma la mancanza del sentiero in sé: non ce n'è traccia.
Al sentiero è stato inizialmente assegnato il grado T3 SAC, ma il grado T3 è descritto come "Un sentiero è solitamente disponibile. I punti esposti sono per lo più assicurati con corde o catene".
Questo sentiero sembra "Sentiero non necessariamente disponibile... Cumuli d'erba insidiosi, pendii rocciosi", che corrisponde al grado T4.
Jrachi (2025-09-02 12:08:29+00:00): Grazie del suggerimento.
Aggiungo il T4
Vl-Sher (2025-09-02 12:44:48+00:00): Grazie!
osmmapper222 (2025-09-01 18:06:41+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/521835580 beinhaltet "Infotafel" im Namen und ist semantisch als solche getaggt.

Wäre es somit nicht redundant, eine Infotafel mit dem Namen Infotafel zu versehen?
OSM_RogerWilco (2025-09-01 18:12:34+00:00): War mir auch aufgefallen. Das Schild war fälschlicherweise als archäologische Ausgrabungsstätte mit Name "... (Infotafel)" erfasst.

Deswegen habe ich das korrigiert. ;)
AndyB_66 (2025-09-01 19:35:19+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
une abeille (2025-09-03 23:57:54+00:00): Thanks for this update! I was surprised that it was already done when I went to do the changes. :)
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-14 06:34:59+00:00): Hello! Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5005158 ?
anshanin (2025-10-14 18:42:04+00:00): Hello. Thank you. Fixed: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173289764
woodpeck (2025-09-01 23:09:26+00:00): Dear CPAP Matt, please provide evidence for naming these footpaths "MrBeast Trail".
CPAP Matt (2025-09-01 23:50:01+00:00): MrBeast is from Greenville.
felipeeugenio (2025-09-01 18:19:03+00:00): Note	Contributor	Tmstmp UTC	Action	Comment
4938122 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-09-01 20:14	closed	ok..
4938129 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-09-01 20:14	closed	ok..
4938136 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-09-01 20:14	closed	ok..
4938143 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-09-01 20:14	closed	ok..
4938150 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-09-01 20:14	closed	ok..
4938124 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-09-01 20:14	closed	ok..
4938131 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-09-01 20:14	closed	ok..
4938138 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-09-01 20:14	closed	ok..
4938145 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-09-01 20:14	closed	ok..
4938152 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-09-01 20:14	closed	ok..
4938133 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-09-01 20:14	closed	ok..
4938140 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-09-01 20:14	closed	ok..
4938147 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-09-01 20:14	closed	ok..
4938128 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-09-01 20:14	closed	ok..
4938142 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-09-01 20:14	closed	ok..
4938149 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-09-01 20:14	closed	ok..
4938123 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-09-01 20:14	closed	ok..
4938130 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-09-01 20:14	closed	ok..
4938137 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-09-01 20:14	closed	ok..
4938144 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-09-01 20:14	closed	ok..
4938151 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-09-01 20:14	closed	ok..
4938125 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-09-01 20:13	closed	ok..
4938132 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-09-01 20:13	closed	ok..
4938139 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-09-01 20:13	closed	ok..
4938146 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-09-01 20:13	closed	ok..
4938127 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-09-01 20:13	closed	ok..
4938134 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-09-01 20:13	closed	ok..
4938141 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-09-01 20:13	closed	ok..
4938148 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-09-01 20:13	closed	ok..
AndyB_66 (2025-09-01 19:34:40+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
custodiankeyy (2025-09-01 19:30:52+00:00): Esri World Imagery has better view for cycle ways. You can change imagery and adjust your editings.
rempshaener (2025-11-23 22:36:41+00:00): Hallo,
vor einer Änderung, die „offensichtlich“ erscheint, hilft es, einmal in die Historie eines Objekts zu schauen.
In diesem Fall sieht man hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140669527, dass jemand schon einmal die „Fake-Adressen“ entfernt hat. Die Adressen, die auch du erfasst hast, sind keine echten Adressen.
Auch die „Namen“ sind keine Namen, sondern Beschreibungen, der Briefkasten kein Briefkasten, die Parkplätze sind nicht als solche ausgewiesen und Übungsfläche, Wege enden an Areas etc.
Zusätzlich hast du eine PLZ-Grenze verschoben und Gebäude gelöscht, obwohl sie noch auf Luftbildern auftauchen. Adressen gedoppelt, Höhe und gleichzeitig building:levels erfasst, mehrere Solarkraftwerke aufs Dach gepackt. Irgendwann habe ich aufgeben, das wieder gerade zu ziehen.
Ich habe deine Änderungssätze gerade teilweise zurückgesetzt; die Namen habe ich in description übernommen. Die PV-Anlagen unmgetaggt und sonst gerettet, was zu retten war.
Viele Grüße
Weblearning (2025-10-06 17:33:24+00:00): Hi there @confusedbuffalo. I see that you have beenmapping out the boundaries of schools. Been looking at the Google map of Springfield model primary school  ( -29.8253679,30.9857276) and Thekwini TVET College (-29.8253679,30.9857276), and I think you have drawn the borders of  Springfield model primary school  over the TVET college borders.
confusedbuffalo (2025-10-06 19:46:20+00:00): I can't use Google Maps as a source, obviously, but if you have surveyed then feel free to correct it. Some of the locations of schools were not perfect in the source data
Weblearning (2025-10-07 04:54:53+00:00): A, thanks very much!
Joseph R P (2025-09-10 01:05:12+00:00): I don't think Red Rock Canyon Road should be trunk since it functions more as a scenic bypass rather than long-distance travel/commuter route (or a component of such a route) like 160 and 146 do. Primary reflects its importance as a high-traffic route that links these very touristy parks to the city while also implying that it's not really a crucial route logistically like highway=trunk would imply.
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-09-10 02:30:01+00:00): Hm, alright then. I'll go change it back. My reasoning for it being trunk are as follows:
* Residents of Blue Diamond can use SR 159 to get to the west-central portions of the valley quickly. The next-fastest route would be SR 160, then either Durango or I-15 to CC 215.
* Residents of the valley who want to visit Red Rock Canyon basically have to use this road eventually, since it's literally the only road connecting it to Red Rock.
Joseph R P (2025-09-11 01:23:35+00:00): Primary would be the ideal tag in a scenario in which you'd want to link a significant area (like Summerlin or Red Rock Canyon) within a population center (like Las Vegas). If 159 served to link longer-distance traffic to, from, or around Vegas, trunk would be the best tag, but functionally it is mostly a local highway.
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-09-14 17:44:57+00:00): Okay, I've since downgraded it (and portions of Hughes Park Drive) back to primary. Thanks!
Comino (2025-09-02 09:58:17+00:00): Hi,

In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes".

Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag !
Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead.

For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Merchants#tagging-guidance
and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bitcoin

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
IT entrepreneur and Bitcoin enthusiast
https://btcmap.org/tagger/6794624
pitfire (2025-09-12 10:54:22+00:00): Hallo Testoofficial,
willkommen bei OSM und danke für Deine Beiträge.
Frage, warum änderst Du die Fläche des Löschzug Seelscheid vollumfänglich in ein Gebäude.

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=171330127

Die Kartierung erfolgt nach den Regel: 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity=fire%20station?uselang=de

VG pitfire
Comino (2025-09-02 19:50:17+00:00): 

Hi,

In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes".

Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag !
Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead.

For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Merchants#tagging-guidance
and osm.wiki/Bitcoin

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
IT entrepreneur and Bitcoin enthusiast
https://btcmap.org/tagger/6794624
Hufkratzer (2025-09-01 20:59:58+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1426455780 is not a horseback riding center (leisure=horse_riding), it is an outdoor riding arena similar to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1168359119 (leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian). See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a#Riding_centre_(equestrian)
Nater Kane (2025-12-28 23:48:48+00:00): When did these sections get closed? Was this decided or derived/discovered? I audited the entirety of this park earlier in 2025 and there hadn't been any closures or abandoned sections that I had come across.
arichnad (2025-12-29 05:08:57+00:00): Hello Nater,

It's a small section of trail (700 feet long) and hardly worth mentioning.


I marked it as abandoned:highway=path here:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1426456597/history


If you didn't notice the trail change, it could be because you didn't swing back close to Benway Court / Bryan Mills Way.

It was "discovered" by me:  someone who works for the park or MORE painted over the red blazes with black blazes, and I assume it's not a black trail :)  If you look at the strava heatmap, nobody on "cycle" is taking it anymore as it is marked as no longer red.

I discovered it on 2025-08-31 and I assume it's why the cut-through trail was opened in the first place, the cut-through was blazed with red, and it seemed like a new trail to me.

If you've been back there near Bently Court and Bryan Mills Way and you think the trail is open, I'd be 100% fine if you marked it as open, but you should remove the "name=Red Trail" tag.

thanks,

arichnad
eggie (2025-09-01 20:18:04+00:00): Welcome to PSM..

According the website it's Camping Marina Eemhof
https://campingmarinaeemhof.nl/

Greetz,
eggie
Johannes Boneschanscher (2025-09-01 20:55:11+00:00): Prima, Hauptsache nicht nur Hof, aber Eemhof, nach dem Eem Fluss der da gegenüber mündet im Eemmeer.
eggie (2025-09-01 21:00:50+00:00): Hi...

Ich habe es gerade geändert 😀

Grüss..
eggie
Danysan95 (2025-09-02 15:19:56+00:00): Ciao, su https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/progetto-del-mese-settembre-2025-paesininonmappati/135057/7 ci chiedevamo da dove vengono i tipi e i nomi dei percorsi pedonali in questo changeset, visto che nel DBSN non li troviamo
wildmaps (2025-09-02 16:43:19+00:00): Ciao Danysan95, ho risposto sulla pagina della community. Grazie
AndyB_66 (2025-09-02 07:55:17+00:00): "Kolonia Koziniec/Łosiniec" w dopełniaczu to "Kolonii Koziniec/Łosiniec", a nie "Kolonii Kozińca/Łosińca" - popraw, proszę. I zwróć uwagę na pozostałe nazwy dwuczłonowe, które ostatnio zmieniłeś.
kubahahaha (2025-09-02 08:41:02+00:00): Wyłapałem tyle oprócz dwóch kolonii o które osobno pytałem w sąsiednim changesecie, mam nadzieję że to wszystko

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171349346
AndyB_66 (2025-09-02 08:53:03+00:00): OK, jedną nazwę sam zmieniłem - w Twoim changesecie, którego już nie komentowałem.