piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:08:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:00:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:13:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:00:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:12:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
evgenykatyshev (2026-03-12 17:44:25+00:00): Possibly the route should be adjusted to https://new.matsne.gov.ge/ka/document/view/5783425?publication=0
NeisBot (2026-03-12 15:54:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13639533198 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Mountainbike verhuur"
---
Bijvoorbeeld, een meer neutrale en feitelijke versie van je tekst kon zijn: "Mountainbike verhuur"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-03-20 17:33:11+00:00): 🤔 The text has been updated, though I’m not entirely sure it’s an improvement.
literan (2026-03-12 19:08:56+00:00): хорошо бы контакты писать все или с префиксом contact: или без, а не вперемешку
NasuFoito (2026-03-12 21:03:52+00:00): Это критическая ошибка или так просто некрасиво?
literan (2026-03-14 13:56:50+00:00): нет, некритическая. Просто следующим редакторам удобнее работать будет, когда оно в одном стиле. Например, кто-то не заметит тег phone и добавит contact:phone
NasuFoito (2026-03-15 21:46:25+00:00): Поняла, хорошо
agilenewt21 (2026-03-12 16:04:05+00:00): I requested review on this.
Particularly unsure whether my tagging is correct (and splitting into separate nodes) for Assist Trauma Care and Guiding Young Minds.
See 'note' and 'fixme' tags on those for more details.
Thanks.
agilenewt21 (2026-03-12 16:05:23+00:00): I set service:bicycle:retail=yes on The Myton Hospices because it seems quite unique within the town in selling used bicycles in addition to the usual charity shop stuff, so thought it was worth tagging.
trial (2026-03-12 21:49:38+00:00): Bonjour, vous avez vu que mettre un nom sans typer l'objet est peu utile. Bien. Après tout vous n'avez mis guère que trois mois pour vous en rendre compte.
Peut-être qu'un jour  vous comprendrez qu'il y a des règles de formatage du numéro de téléphone et qu'en France (a priori vous ne faites pas de dégâts ailleurs donc cette information devrait vous suffire) la convention est de respecter ce format-ci : +33 x xx xx xx xx. Et donc de mettre non pas +33 821 80 18 03 mais +33 8 21 80 18 03.
En fait ceci n'est même pas correct puisque vous mettez le numéro national et non le numéro local qui est le +33 2 97 05 48 26 (Cf. https://www.axxel.fr/louer-un-materiel/nos-agences-nos-interlocuteurs-location-de-materiel/).
Peut-être qu'un jour vous comprendrez aussi qu'il y a des règles concernant les adresses.
"Rue Lavoisier ZAC du" n'est pas un nom de rue. La rue s'appelle "Rue Lavoisier"
"ZAC du" ne fait pas partie du nom de rue et fait référence à la Zone artisanale du Mourillon.
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2026-03-13 08:30:04+00:00): Bonjour, merci de votre alerte. Pour le typage des objets
La campagne de correction de typage, qui a débuté en janvier, arrive enfin à son terme. Je suis navré que cela ait pris autant de temps. La correction est bien prise en compte de notre côté. Concernant le numéro de téléphone, le formatage des numéros normaux est bien réalisé, concernant les numéros nationaux type 08 nous avons bien pris en compte votre remarque et nous allons vérifier.  Pour l'adresse,  C'est une erreur de notre part. Le client a transmis l'information telle quelle ("Rue Lavoisier ZAC du") et nous avons manqué de vigilance lors de la validation. La correction est faite. Bonne journée.
iandees (2026-03-12 17:50:58+00:00): Hi! It looks like a node in this changeset was accidentally moved. This can happen when panning the map. The node has been moved back to its previous position.
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:10:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:02:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:11:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
TinPetreković (2026-03-13 18:08:57+00:00): The tag that was accidentally placed on a node has been removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179823155
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 08:58:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:08:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:00:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:09:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
jm428 (2026-03-12 18:04:18+00:00): Having the footpath connected to the road there was technically correct, because someone walking on the footpath would be able to start walking on the road once the footpath ended. 
You are right though that there isn't actually a path connecting them, so for more detailed mapping you can use the tags highway=footway and footway=link to connect the path and road, which is what I have just done. You can read more about that tag here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Afootway%3Dlink
NeisBot (2026-03-12 16:45:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13613147376 v7

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Gift shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisAgent (2026-03-13 06:33:31+00:00): 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again?
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-06 09:12:14+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags/values in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/185184949
FroschForscher (2026-03-12 19:20:57+00:00): Hallo Auszeithaus Altental willkommen bei OSM,
ich habe die meisten Änderungen an dem Zufahrtsweg zurückgebaut. Bitte nochmal mit jetzigen Stand prüfen was noch fehlt.

Um einige Probleme zu nennen:
- Straßen sollten sich nie überlappen oder doppelt eingezeichnet werden.
- Namen sollten nicht erfunden werden, wenn etwas keinen Namen sonder nur eine Beschreibung hat ist das in Ordnung. 

Danke für deine Beiträge zu OSM.

FroschForscher
Auszeithaus Altental (2026-03-13 16:30:30+00:00): Hallo FroschForscher,
puh, jetzt muss ich nochmals von vorne anfangen. Ich war so froh über meine Arbeit. Seit dem auch noch die Brücke über die Bahn abgebrochen wurde, ist es für fremde kaum noch möglich zu mir zu finden. Es ist zum Verzweifeln.
Auszeithaus Altental.
FroschForscher (2026-03-13 17:41:14+00:00): = 1. Rückgängig gemachte Änderungen / Übernommene Änderungen

Auch wenn ich die meisten Änderungen Technisch zurückgenommen habe da mit Flächen und anderen Straßen überlappend verklebt habe ich die Kernänderung (Änderung auf  Zufahrtsweg übernommen) lediglich Details wie die Oberfläche waren zu widersprüchlich um sicher übernommen zu werden.

= 2. Routing zum Haus 

Ich hab das letzte Stückchen (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/26365961) in Anlieger frei geändert, damit sollte das Routing jetzt bis zum Haus funktionieren.

Jedoch haben die meisten OSM basierten Router die ich getestet habe auch schon mit den alten Daten (von Anfang der Woche) Korrekt bis zum "Reitweg" geroutet. Hier kann es nur daran liegen das Navis veraltet Daten nutzen (9 Monate¹), keine Navis genutzt werden sondern auf die Karte geschaut wird (wo jetzt ein breiter weißer Strich anstelle eines schmalen Braunen ist) oder aber das Google gefragt wird. G Maps schickt einen über die ~Brücke~ Bahngleise, auch wenn die Brücke in der Luftbild Ansicht nicht mehr existiert 

Laut https://www.auszeithaus-altental.de/kontakt/ gibt es ein Rechtsabbiegeverbot an den Bahngleisen. Stimmt das und sollte in OSM übernommen werden?

= 3. Sonstiges

Kann man das "Auszeithaus Altental" irgendwie in Sinnvoll in eine OSM Kategorie einordnen?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:tourism
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:amenity
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:leisure

¹ÄS Brückenabriss: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168286096
Auszeithaus Altental (2026-03-18 16:27:27+00:00): Hallo Froschfinder,
erst mal vielen Dank für deine Hilfe!
1. Ja, es gibt ein Rechtsabbiegeverbot an den Bahngleisen.
2. Das Auszeithaus Altental würde ich in Key:leisure einordnen.
3. Was vielleicht auch noch wichtig ist: Es ist eine Sackgasse. Alle Feldwege enden in Wiesen.
Nochmals vielen Dank.
Jens Wagner
FroschForscher (2026-03-20 16:58:41+00:00): Rechtsabbiegeverbot hinzugefügt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180169169

Bezüglich G Maps hätte ich vorgeschlagen das LKA Baden-Württemberger um Hilfe zu beten, die scheinen aber auch ihre Probleme mit dem Dienst zu haben 🙂.
https://www.swr.de/swraktuell/rheinland-pfalz/ludwigshafen/polizei-annweiler-beisst-sich-an-google-die-zaehne-aus-100.html
thebrad1111 (2026-03-12 16:45:42+00:00): Also used streetside
rohieb (2026-03-12 18:00:10+00:00): Relevante Notizen waren https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5047461
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5180834
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5180830
jm428 (2026-03-12 17:55:41+00:00): Hi, thanks for contributing to OSM!
Just so you know, the name tag should only be used if something officially has a name. So frequently the name tag can be left blank. I've removed the name from the drop off road because I am guessing that is not the official name.

If the playground, field, and track do not have official names, those name tags can also be removed.

Here is an excerpt from the wiki which explains more: 
"Do not construct names for features by combining the name of an enclosing feature with a description. For example, an unnamed fountain in XYZ Park should not be tagged with name=XYZ Park Fountain. Internal features to a named area should only be tagged with a name when they have a commonly-used local name, or some other indication (such as signage) of the feature's name." (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Editing_Standards_and_Conventions)
Langlaeufer (2026-04-17 19:12:29+00:00): Du hast hier haufenweise Punkte ohne Eigenschaften hinterlassen.
Nadjita (2026-04-17 19:38:14+00:00): Scheiße. Keine Absicht. Fixt Du, oder soll ich?
osmviborg (2026-03-13 07:11:20+00:00): Hvorfor?
kamillz (2026-03-13 09:54:22+00:00): Fordi hele marken er gravet op
AsgerFrank (2026-03-17 07:54:30+00:00): Det skulle have været skrevet i source eller som ændringssætkommentar straks; et bærende princip i osm-redigering er  at angive kilderne.

Source i ændringssættagget som det eneste er nærmest misvisende; det er jo et før-billede.
kamillz (2026-03-17 14:55:13+00:00): Den må have været smuttet i farten
literan (2026-03-12 19:03:56+00:00): зачем на сарае дубль адреса дома, но по Деревне, когда тут адрес по СНТ?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1219531812/history
NasuFoito (2026-03-12 21:07:43+00:00): Плагин вроде не должен добавлять дубли, извините
literan (2026-03-14 13:58:38+00:00): так вы и не дубль добавили, а снова адрес в СНТ - по населенному пункту.

на основном доме стояло
addr:housenumber=150
addr:place=СНТ «Лира»

а на сарай вы добавили
addr:housenumber=150
addr:place=Нефедьево

очевидно, плагин не считает это дублем
NasuFoito (2026-03-15 21:50:45+00:00): Я откатила пакет, спасибо за замечание.
literan (2026-03-12 18:58:39+00:00): Почему адреска в СНТ проставлена по населенному пункту, когда в ЕГРН она по СНТ? например https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/555275395/history

и так множество адресов в этой правке. Вы сами исправите или мне нужно откатывать?
NasuFoito (2026-03-12 21:04:10+00:00): Откатила
NeisBot (2026-03-12 17:15:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13639106163 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Remote control track"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-20 17:33:12+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180170914
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
smaptious (2026-03-13 20:30:18+00:00): Correction: Source used was Esri World Imagery.
NeisBot (2026-03-12 17:27:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13639561036 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Frame shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-20 17:33:13+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180170916
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
Sammyhawkrad (2026-03-12 17:52:04+00:00): Hi ERIC TWUM-UEW, welcome to OSM. Please don't add duplicate ways to existing roads.
NeisBot (2026-03-12 17:33:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/9692579324 v8

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Jewelry store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-21 05:33:02+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180187189
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
pwbriggs (2026-03-18 04:34:48+00:00): Hello https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Lc4590,

Is this defibrillator inside the Fourth & Vine Building? And are there 2 separate units, one on floor 1 and one on floor 5?

Thanks, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
iandees (2026-03-12 17:52:35+00:00): Hi! It looks like the website URL on node/2431031299 may have been copied from Google Maps (it contained Google tracking parameters). Please be careful not to copy information from Google into OpenStreetMap, as Google's data is copyrighted.
sparnonien (2026-03-12 19:45:38+00:00): bonsoir et merci. Je vais m'abstenir de remplir les sites web 
Pour information j'utilise Duckduckgo et Qwant comme moteur de recherche
good evening, thank you. I will refrain from filling out the websites 
 For information, I use Duckduckgo and Qwant as a search engine
Norbert Dichter (2026-03-12 20:00:39+00:00): Hello, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. Thank you for your contribution. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. Or just hit the Q-key.
Also please keep in mind: many buildings are very close but do not actually touch each other, try to map them close to each other without letting them connect or share nodes with each other, roads, or residential area outlines. In the iD web editor, holding down the "alt" key will keep nodes from "snapping" to each other and accidentally connecting.  Thanks so much for your contribution, Norbert 'Nodi' Dichter, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179769142
literan (2026-04-12 09:42:42+00:00): удалил. автомобили мы на карту не наносим. Там сказано: частник, никакого офиса нет
FroschForscher (2026-03-12 19:23:06+00:00): Hallo Auszeithaus Altental,
Ein Feldweg auf dem keine Traktoren fahren dürfen sondern nur Pferde, könnte es sich dabei um einen Reitweg handeln? Welches Verkehrszeichen hängt dort?

FroschForscher
Auszeithaus Altental (2026-03-13 16:22:11+00:00): Hallo FroschForscher,
es wird tatsächlich ein von der Stadt genehmigter Pferdeauslauf. Früher war dort ein Fußweg, der dann über eine Brücke führte. Seit zwei Jahren ist die Brücke abgebrochen und wird nicht wieder aufgebaut. 
Auszeithaus Altental
idontknowwhyihavethisasmyusername (2026-03-13 23:25:32+00:00): Why this? Because of this I reported you of being a vandal.
NeisBot (2026-03-12 17:58:22+00:00): Hello fhtkf, welcome to OSM, and thank you for your contributions!

I've taken a look at your recent edits and wanted to discuss a few discrepancies I noticed regarding the surrounding environmental features. Specifically, the locations in your edits don't seem to align with the typical geographical characteristics expected in that area. Here are some (max 10) relevant links to the edits:
https://osm.org/way/1488107948
https://osm.org/way/1488107949

Could you please take a look?
Looking forward to your response.

#Somewhere
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179770007
NeisRevert (2026-03-12 19:26:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/179773274
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
NeisBot (2026-03-12 18:00:53+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13641749975 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Cybersecurity office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-21 05:33:10+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180187194
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
FroschForscher (2026-03-12 19:14:10+00:00): > amenity=restaurant
> disused:amenity=yes
> name=Cafe Auszeit

Das wird von den meisten Datenkonsumern vermutlich weiterhin als restaurant betrachtet.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179770257
walloHerbrechtingen (2026-03-13 11:18:09+00:00): Hallo,
Hinweis war vollkommen richtig!
Danke
done!
Konrad95 (2026-03-12 21:33:03+00:00): Hi! Just a small note regarding your recent edits in Otwock.
Please avoid using the tag `public_transport=platform` on bus platforms (`highway=platform`, `bus=yes`).

In the tagging scheme used in Warsaw and the surrounding area, `public_transport=platform` is applied only to the bus stop nodes next to the road. This helps avoid duplicating the tag between the node and the platform.

You can find more details in this discussion: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/bus-ztm-warszawa/5105/32 Thanks!
Grain423 (2026-03-12 21:44:23+00:00): Thanks for the information! Didn't know about any specific convention, so I'll keep that in mind and adjust that accordingly.
SeasnaiIs (2026-03-19 13:37:11+00:00): I've opened a discussion regarding this changeset on the forums:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/should-we-prioritse-official-truth/142448
EdLoach (2026-03-19 14:00:05+00:00): Doesn't this supercede the special road order? https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1986/1736/contents/made
LordGarySugar (2026-03-19 14:48:03+00:00): Making this change is incorrect - if the road is signed as an A road, it's an A road. By changing the road to a motorway, you are implying that certain traffic types cannot be routed here, for example learner drivers, when in reality they are allowed to drive along this road. Maxspeed should also reflect the signage on the ground, not whatever historic document you are citing.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-03-19 15:41:33+00:00): reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180117252

thread was not really needed, but I guess we have clear confirmation

if you dislike that legislation mismatches actual signage feel free to petition to change one making less sense
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-03-19 15:43:46+00:00): BTW, source linked in source:highway anyway failed to indicate that this 1968 document was not revoked since then

how do you know that it still applies? If you would be mapping official status in tag separate from highway remember to provide sources allowing to verify this claim