piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
grzegorz75jan (2026-04-12 05:21:25+00:00): W dużym skrócie nie widzę większego sensu w większości przypadkach na rozbijanie praktycznie placu parkingu na drobne części.

Realnie na mapie można zobaczyć przeróżne podejścia ale często ewidentnie widać, że można zastosować jeden cały obszar a nie dwa czy pięć kawałków. Gdy komuś się chce i zna teren lub podkład zdjęć lotniczych umożliwia to można na placu parkingu dodać miejsca postojowe.

Przykładowo tu jest potworek https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1498625761 Obok jest miejsce dla inwalidów które jest częścią parkingu.
Tu https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1442433954 obok siebie są dwa miejsca dla inwalidów ale wydzieliłeś jedno.

Wiem, że parkingi to czasem powód do rozmkiniania i nie wiadomo jak go ugryźć ale w znacznej części te rozdzielenia nie mają uzasadnienia. 

A i rysując drogi nie dopieszczaj na żywca łuków, zakrętów ponieważ to tylko dodaje nadmiarowe węzły które nawigacje muszą przeanalizować, przeliczyć, wykluczyć. Tu https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/182590348 90% węzłów zbędnych.

Sam mam na sumieniu trochę różnych baboli. Nie chce mi się lub ot tak nie podam lub błędnie podam rodzaj parkingu itp.
grzegorz75jan (2026-04-12 06:03:43+00:00): Ta linia https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/117618421
Josm podaje mi ponad 40 węzłów do usunięcia no to by nie było tak brzydko spokojnie można wywalić 20. 
Tylko na tym odcinku https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/708414413 11 zbędnych węzłów. 
Ładowanie węzłów co metr ? Zwykłe liczniki, nawigacje rowerowe się pocą jak wściekłe nie mówiąc o tym gdy ktoś ma np. zaplanowaną trasę na 100 czy więcej km i później długo się im to wczytuje, gubi się. 
Żadna cywilna nawigacja i to pod drzewami nie ma nawet dokładności do jednego metra a nagrywając, rejestrując jazdę potrafi się walnąć o parę metrów.

To ładnie wygląda na mapie ale szkoda czasu, obciążania serwerów, urządzeń i innych edytujących którzy później coś edytują szczególnie gdy są sklejki np. jakichś różnych obszarów połączonych ze sobą np. trawników z czym się da i z czym się nie powinno.

Tak od 48 minuty https://youtu.be/xBMIoypkdI4?list=PLTgtPjgzssHzsgAqYbi2QfRoRk1S9ioX5&t=2883

Przy okazji trafiłem na ten budynek https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/233356842 source bing, note (bla bla bla nie przesuwać) do wywalenia bo stare i nieaktualne a obrys jest zgodny z podkładem budynków.

Kontynuując marudzenie to ten parking https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/233356842 można spokojnie dać jako jedną całość a linii drogi na upartego zrezygnować z łuków i narysować brutalnie pod kątem prostym 90 stopni. Nikt się tam nie pogubi.

Film który dodałem jest częścią listy odtwarzania więc możesz obejrzeć pozostałe. Reszta sztuki edycji to pomoc edytora czyli Wikipedia polska i angielska https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity=parking
Warto też poszperać forum 
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/pl/40 choć można zgłupieć.
Do Dioscorda się dokopiesz gdy będziesz chciał.

W każdym razie dobrze, że coś dodajesz ale trzeba zachować umiar.
Deftax (2026-04-12 15:10:30+00:00): Dzięki za rady, ciężko będzie poprawić wszystkie podobne rzeczy z poprzednich edycji, ale postaram się nie robić tych błędów w nowych
acubens71 (2026-04-11 20:27:47+00:00): Bonsoir,

Vos tracés de landuse sont bien trop détaillés, il y a des simples arbres qui sont taggés comme des forêts (un arbre n'est pas un bosquet et encore moins un verger, on mappe le terrain !) ou encore du décalquage de la canopée des arbres.
Lorsque l'on change d'imagerie (par exemple une autre année de Ortho HR) on se rend compte que les micro-détails n'existent pas dans la réalité, c'est pour cela qu'il vaut mieux rester plus synthétique.

Cordialement.
Herwescheluc (2026-04-12 15:23:17+00:00): Hallo, letihu,

erstmal eine gute Idee, überall addr:suburb=* zu ergänzen. Dabei ist Dir jedoch leider ein fataler Fehler unterlaufen: Münchholzhausen gehört zu Wetzlar, hier ist aber Driedorf-Münchhausen!

Grüße aus Herborn

Amdreas
letihu (2026-04-12 15:46:08+00:00): Hallo Andreas,
da schaue heute abend noch mal nach.
Den Ort nehme ich eigentlich von einer vorhandenen  Adresse.

Viele Grüße Hubert
Herwescheluc (2026-04-12 16:59:30+00:00): Hallo, Hubert,

habe gerade geschaut und gefunden: Brückenstraße 16, vor 7 Jahren von Lokalfürst eingetragen. War damals schon falsch... 😀

Du hast Bastiansweg 22 und Knotenstraße 5 übersehen. Alle 3 solltest Du also mit in die Überarbeitung einbeziehen.

Viele Grüße und eine schöne Woche!

Andreas
RaphaelPasloin (2026-04-12 05:34:57+00:00): Bonjour,

Merci pour l'ajout, mais vu le nombre en une fois et le fait que vous mentionnez comme source une imagerie aérienne cet édit pose question.

Ce point est un convenience : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13723985857 (peut-être avez vous utilisé d'ancienne image Mapillary ?)

Ce point ci est encore plus problématique : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13723985840 vous indiquez que c'est un bar, seulement ils n'ont pas cet activité dans la BCE : https://kbopub.economie.fgov.be/kbopub/toonondernemingps.html?ondernemingsnummer=747748056

uniquement commerce de tabac ; j'ai cherché d'où pouvait venir ce amenity=bar et c'est comme ça que c'est indiqué dans google ! 

Pouvez-vous svp indiqué quel source vous avez utilisé ?

D'avance merci
Raphael
CouscousMerguez (2026-04-14 20:12:14+00:00): Bonjour, enfaite j'ai l'habitude de toujours avoir une imagerie aérienne et elle se met en source. J'ai fais ça à partie de photo que j'ai prise car je suis passé récemment dans la rue. Pour la node que vous avez mentionné, en devanture c'est un bar à chicha. J'ignorait qu'on ne pouvait pas classer ça comme bar "classique".
felipeeugenio (2026-04-11 21:22:04+00:00): Hola. Sacaron un teléfono SOS de la carretera y no pusieron otro? Esos están ahí por bases del contrato, es muy raro que simplemente saquen uno.

Solo para confirmar. Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181206098
jSeke (2026-04-23 20:58:43+00:00): what existing valid data did I delete? I'm going to have to re-do all the merges and re-add all the missing Gaelic to this.
mapbear66 (2026-04-27 08:39:14+00:00): On a number places of you had deleted the well known name and replaced it with gaelic, but not put the existing name in name:en. But that is immaterial. 

Do not repeat that changeset as it's a huge edit without proper scrutiny or verifiable sources. You have been inappropriately changing well known names for gaelic where it is not used. You obviously have an agenda to replace all name tags in Scotland with Gaelic even where it is not routinely used - i.e. the ground truth, which is not in the interest of OpenStreetMap. 

Who are you?
Enock4seth (2026-04-11 22:06:59+00:00): Hi, right click on the building and select Square or Press "Q". Do not fill in or add fields when you don't know what they mean. Click the "i" adjacent the form fields for more information if needed. 

You can also map a few more buildings before uploading / saving them to OpenStreetMap.
Enock4seth (2026-04-11 22:03:40+00:00): Hi Ahmed_12, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Roads should be connected to other roads. Adding floating unconnected ways is not helpful, also see meaning of various values for the highway tag at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway?uselang=en#Roads
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-05-05 14:18:47+00:00): zerkniesz na https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5279704 ?

to railway=proposed jest nadal na serio planowane? chyba nie i powinno być skasowane
felipeeugenio (2026-04-11 21:26:15+00:00): Hola. Buenas tardes.

La gran diferencia entre =track y =path es que por path no pueden circular vehículos de 4 ruedas.

En los caminos que transformó a path se ve claramente que hay huellas de auto. Es correcta la edición? los caminos ya resultan intransitables para autos? o se trata de un error?

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181207226
MxxCon (2026-04-12 20:39:39+00:00): Hello.
While your edit is not wrong, instead of changing "amenity=fast_food" into "disused:shop=yes", you could've just make it "disused:amenity=fast_food".👍
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181207359
gopinath16 (2026-04-14 02:31:39+00:00): Got it. Thanks. Will do that from next time.
maro21 (2026-04-13 23:22:41+00:00): Why such a huge changeset with 25 descriptions? Why didn't you edit one area and saved? Could you make smaller changesets?
Poprawiłem (2026-06-30 13:06:18+00:00): Hi, I do not think this changeset is huge. It spans only one area which is part of west side of Wrocław, however my next changesets have less changes. Could you combine multiple single element updates into one bigger changeset? That would make the changeset history more readable.
CestJoseph (2026-04-12 16:10:30+00:00): Bonsoir,
La passerelle est impraticable et il n'y a PAS de gué !
CestJoseph (2026-04-12 16:12:41+00:00): https://omaps.app/_4AYk54bOX/Chemin
Bonsoir,
La passerelle est impraticable et il n'y a PAS de gué !
Everteal (2026-04-12 20:51:39+00:00): Bonsoir,

Ah, d'accord, j'avais mal compris. Si je comprends bien, ce passage n'est pas praticable tout court, c'est ça ?
CestJoseph (2026-04-13 05:51:35+00:00): Exactement
Natfoot (2026-04-11 21:57:32+00:00): it will be on mapillary later today or tomorrow
Deftax (2026-04-11 21:22:27+00:00): Note: Jeśli zrobiłem coś źle jeśli chodzi o parkingi (jest to dosyć skomplikowane), to proszę napisać, wtedy to poprawię.
no details provided here (2026-04-12 08:16:08+00:00): Hi - can I assist with whatever the issue is on this property? Thanks for your work. I can be there in a couple of minutes to clarify/verify (I originally mapped it and was on site as the house was built).  Thanks.
BCNorwich (2026-04-12 05:32:25+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I've removed the fiction and strange shapes. I've added your new building and footpath data to the map.

Regards Bernard.
NeisAgent (2026-04-11 22:33:21+00:00): 🕵 The changeset tags appear to reference Google as a data source.

Please note that using Google Maps, Google Street View, or similar Google services as a mapping source is not allowed in OpenStreetMap due to license restrictions.

More information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google

If the data in this changeset was derived from Google or another incompatible source, the edits may need to be reverted.

If this is a misunderstanding and the data was collected from permitted sources (e.g. local survey, Bing imagery, local knowledge, etc.), please clarify in a reply.
jetbridge guy (2026-04-11 22:38:46+00:00): Got it. I have other sources and will remove google maps from the data
jm428 (2026-04-11 22:29:25+00:00): Correction: the source was a survey, not imagery
jm428 (2026-04-11 22:29:31+00:00): Correction: the source was a survey, not imagery
jm428 (2026-04-11 22:28:57+00:00): Correction: the source was a survey, not imagery
melbournefan (2026-04-15 05:29:33+00:00): Again, can you not change tags on items which are temporary, as routing engines as well as maps do not constantly update and are discouraged on OpenStreetMap
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181210023
LachlanTansey2009 (2026-04-15 07:44:26+00:00): Its been disused since November 2025 and only now is just back in use. Definitely something that should've been included.
melbournefan (2026-04-22 11:27:49+00:00): That's incorrect, the changes were temporary and not permanent.
Alliegaytor (2026-04-25 04:29:13+00:00): Technically everything we map is *temporary*. I think 5 months is fine to map generally, especially in the case of roadworks and such; although, in this case, I think it's dubious to map railways as disused for such a short time span. Anyone who can travel over that railway probably knows it's disused without needing to check OSM, but marking it as disused will cause errors to flag in OSMI as the route relations are going over railways not in use.

From what I can tell, routers tend to update monthly at the longest, so that's the time period I would map lifecycle prefixes (only if I know I will update it when it changes again). Adding something that'll be there for a day or two -- which I've seen Lachlan do -- is not good for routing as it may be cached for upwards of a month or so. That should be avoided, ideally.
melbournefan (2026-04-26 10:59:41+00:00): Thanks for that, it's not something I'd advise considering temporary speed restrictions are not mapped and can either be temporary or basically permanent, it's debatable on what is considered temporary.

I do believe the constant updating of ways also mean that some issues may arise in relation to systems editors may not see that are on the 'deep web' ie, internal systems.

Not something I would change based on convention unless something else dictates it
fortera_au (2026-05-08 05:00:07+00:00): Anything under 6 months, the most I would consider doing is a conditional tag, and even then, the rail still exists and it's not in a permanent state of disuse, so the change to disused isn't really accurate even over that temporary period.
OSMaper_xD (2026-04-12 17:20:40+00:00): Dzięki, za poprawke
eggie (2026-04-12 06:43:38+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
我的龟Toyota又圆 (2026-06-13 05:18:05+00:00): Not sure if this either isn’t a Flock Cam or it doesn’t work, sat next to it for a solid 30 mins with night vision goggles and it doesn’t seem to get trigger by traffic or any motion…
Oisín (2026-04-13 13:10:47+00:00): Danke Dir für das Aufteilen der Route.
campbelltree (2026-05-05 22:37:29+00:00): Hey there, you failed to connect the end of the drivethrough back to the road properly. I've fixed it: changeset/182270888
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-12 08:22:02+00:00): Could you provide a source for "tonjau" here? "Complejo Rodo" seems to be a real residential/community name, but "tonjau" does not appear to be a clear alternate name for it, so a reference would help confirm this association.

Thanks.
felipeeugenio (2026-04-12 17:32:27+00:00): Se reponen datos eliminados del recinto y se reemplazan por los del edificio. Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181210854
eggie (2026-04-12 07:06:30+00:00): Dag Kobus.. Probeer als het kan op de adresnode bij te taggen.
MVG
eggie
kobuskobus (2026-04-12 11:09:07+00:00): Hallo, ik ben relatief nieuw aan het bijdragen aan OSM, kan je me vertellen wat je bedoelt met de adresnode?
eggie (2026-04-12 11:31:30+00:00): Hoi.. Samen met de gebouwen zijn ook de adressen geïmporteerd.
Die adressen staan op punten of knopen. In osm taal heten dat nodes.
Wanneer je het adres van zo n winkel weet kun je dat adres selecteren en de winkelinfo bijvoegen.
Mapse,
eggie
eggie (2026-04-12 15:02:15+00:00): Info saengevoegd
kobuskobus (2026-04-12 18:43:33+00:00): Interessant. Ik denk dat de app die ik gebruikt redelijk beperkt is voor sommige edits. Ik zou eens op zoek gaan naar een andere. Bedankt voor het samenvoegen!
silversurfer83 (2026-04-12 18:54:32+00:00): Hi there :)

since you left no Changeset Comment and no source I have to ask:

Why did you set these two motorway links to access=no ?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181211367
greggerm (2026-04-12 19:01:22+00:00): Greetings - both ramps will be closed for several months to facilitate construction in the area. 

https://www.ri.gov/press/view/50307
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181211367
silversurfer83 (2026-04-12 19:07:31+00:00): Thanks for the quick reply.

Please leave these kinds of info in the change set for all to see.

Also, leave a note=* and fixme=* detailing the reasons for access=no with a date for people to check if it's reopened.

The better way to treat these short term closures are conditional access tags like
access:conditional=no @ (YYYY-MM-DD-YYYY-MM-DD)

That way it's impossible to have the road closed for too long even if you forget to check it after construction is over.

many data consumers only update once a month or even less frequently so these short term closures often linger for much longer in their data.

happy mapping
felipeeugenio (2026-04-12 17:35:08+00:00): Hola. por favor no alterar las numeraciones de los sitios. El tag name= es para otro tipo de información.

Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181211474
IanRsch (2026-05-01 12:09:15+00:00): hago los cambios con plano en mano.
Lenny Andreu (2026-05-03 01:18:59+00:00): Hola Ian, cual es esa fuente "plano en mano"? Recordar que el uso de fuentes externas a las comprobables en terreno estan desaconsejadas a menos que tengan una licencia compatible con el mapa. 

Referencia a uso name https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181211474
inserteunnombreaqui (2026-04-12 02:07:26+00:00): 私はベトナム人です。ありがとうございます
LakeTana (2026-04-14 17:12:53+00:00): Hello AlexLabrada, and thank you for mapping!

I noticed that in your changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181211589 and 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181206649 and few others in Cuba you made some ref tag changes. For example here along https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/210642536 you have updated the ref from CC;6-N-1 to CN;6-123 and along https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/336861379 you updated from CN;6-I-23 to CN;6-123. Can you please explain to me how you determined these ref tags? Do you have any relevant and current resources you would like to share so I can have a better understanding of these changes. 
Thank you and I looking forward to hear from you.
AlexLabrada (2026-04-18 20:25:44+00:00): Hello, I have old road maps (in paper) that indicate these references, the current ref tags do not have a specific source.
AlexLabrada (2026-04-18 20:31:19+00:00): 6-123 is the North circuit of the former Oriente Province (from Las Tunas to Baracoa)
4-I-3;5-I-3 is the Interprovincial  North Circuit in the fprmer provinces of Las Villas (4) and Camaguey (5) (the first figure indicates the province. This is the same as CN (stands for Circuito Norte)
LakeTana (2026-04-21 20:10:41+00:00): I appreciate your response. I understand that some of your sources may be paper-based. However, since these are not easily reachable by other contributors, could you please provide more details about them (such as the name, issuing authority, and publication date)?

If this is part of a consistent approach or dataset, it might be beneficial to document it on the Cuba OSM wiki page so other mappers can better understand and follow the same logic.

Thanks in advance for your help
AlexLabrada (2026-04-23 14:53:37+00:00): Thank you, I am in contact by the telegram chat with local mappers.
Udarian (2026-04-12 16:21:42+00:00): Wouldn't the "North Miami Beach Solid Waste" be better tagged as a government office rather than a waste transfer station as I don't see anywhere where cars from the public could enter from aerial and streetside imagery in iD.

Happy mapping,
Udar.
FlamingoOSM (2026-04-12 16:33:15+00:00): You are right, i made the changes
Udarian (2026-04-12 17:22:42+00:00): thanks
NeisBot (2026-04-12 00:36:16+00:00): 🌍 Welcome to OSM, zhaxiqi.
Thanks for contributing!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

✅ Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added buildings"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment
TagaSanPedroAko (2026-04-30 08:21:57+00:00): reverted (problematic speed limit changes without specific source, such as posted signs or traffic law)
TagaSanPedroAko (2026-07-25 17:14:38+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap.

As for the speed limit (maxspeed=), it is usually mapped to posted limits on signs or If there are none, the default according to Republic Act 4136. I don't know where you get these supposed new speed limits, so I reverted it.

Thank you.

—
Kumusta at maligayang pagdating sa OpenStreetMap.

Tungkol sa speed limit (maxspeed=), karaniwang itong is minamapa sa nakapaskil na speed limit sa karatula or kung wala, ang default ayon sa Republic Act 4136. Di ko alam kung saan mo nakuha ang sinasabi mong bagong speed limit, kaya ni-revert ko ito.

Salamat.
nevw (2026-04-12 11:18:04+00:00): Hi, in osm buildings are mapped by zooming in very close and accurately mapping each building outline using the imagery. I have deleted the buildings tags and tagged the area as landuse. The addr:state|postcode|suburb are not required as these are already mapped by area in Australia so I deleted these too.
fortera_au (2026-04-12 23:55:23+00:00): These aren't a house=terrace. They should also be mapped as individual houses, not as one.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181212189
Wildsharky (2026-04-15 07:18:42+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:181302224
ajmat (2026-04-13 12:10:17+00:00): Reverted in changeset id: 181272702
TheNightRider (2026-05-18 01:27:11+00:00): Hi KelsonV, just confirming that the 3rd way (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1498676987) of the Tesla Supercharger relation contains the 2 disabled stalls. I can't find a photo of that anywhere, but you mentioned doing a survey.
TheNightRider (2026-05-18 01:36:09+00:00): Never mind, I see them very clearly in the Mapbox background imagery layer!
joost schouppe (2026-04-26 07:48:19+00:00): You added a very long road here on top of already existing roads... I've deleted it, but there were subsequent changes made to it. I think I managed to delete it without creating conflicts
Wildsharky (2026-04-13 12:02:36+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:181265855
aharvey (2026-04-13 22:43:44+00:00): Welcome to OSM @rkurytnik. It looks like you may have accidentally dragged an address node onto a power line which doesn't look right. It's too easy to make that mistake in the iD editor, so just something to try and avoid in the future.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-15 09:26:49+00:00): Reverted adding SEO POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags, possibly sourced from Google Maps, in changeset 184127698

https://osm.org/changeset/184127698
NeisBot (2026-04-12 03:56:17+00:00): 🌍 Welcome to OSM, Mias7546.
Thanks for contributing!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

✅ Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added 32 buildings"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment
Steffo45 (2026-04-12 03:48:38+00:00): oops e anche altre cose al parco, pensavo di aver già salvato il changeset
NeisBot (2026-04-12 04:16:28+00:00): 🌍 OSMへようこそ、たるん。
貢献してくれてありがとう！

コラボレーションを容易にし、他の人があなたの編集を理解するのを助けるために、あなたが行った変更について短い説明を追加するのがベストです。明確なコメントは、コミュニティがあなたの仕事を追跡し、より良いフィードバックを提供するのに役立ちます。いいコメントの書き方に関するヒントはこちら[1]にあります。

✅ ここには、あなたのマップ編集に基づいたサンプルのコメントがあります: 「独立した家、マンション、コミュニティホール、駐車場、住宅道路、遊園地、森林を追加し、建物の属性を更新しました」
(Auto-translation)
---
🌍 Welcome to OSM, たるん.
Thanks for contributing!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

✅ Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added detached houses, apartments, community hall, parking, residential roads, playground, woodland, updated building attributes"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment