piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ChristianA (2023-12-19 21:06:37+00:00): Hej. Den där vägen kan väl inte vara "secondary"? Möjligen "unclassified" eller (troligare) "track".
Taya_S (2023-11-25 13:02:19+00:00): Please do not use OSM as a testing ground and please also do not map temporary events
arjunaraoc (2024-01-08 11:34:47+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143162139
AndersAndersson (2023-10-26 20:43:23+00:00): Hello
What made you choose unclassified over residential or driveway?
mikimapbuilder (2023-11-02 07:07:43+00:00): Hi AndersAndersson and thank you for your comment. We made changes based on a Map builder user. This might be residential or driveway as well, so fill free to change if you think it should be different. Thank you.
rskedgell (2023-10-31 08:15:21+00:00): You appear to have tagged sections of Daresbury Expressway and Chester Road as foot=no in response to a StreetComplete task asking "Are pedestrians forbidden to walk on this road here?"

I'm trying to find any evidence in Bing Streetside imagery that there really is a (signed) pedestrian prohibition here. I cannot see any TSRGD diagram 625.1 "pedestrians prohibited" signs on the imagery, so do not believe that a prohibition exists. Is this a new signed restriction created by a traffic order more recent than the Bing streetside imagery?

The wiki states that access tags reflect legal access. Subjective opinions about whether it would be pleasant, a good idea, safe, etc. for a particular transport mode are not relevant to legal access.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:foot

As real pedestrian prohibitions on public roads other than those tagged as highway=motorway or motorroad=yes in the UK are quite rare and are always signed, this quest is probably better left disabled.
AlmostSurelyRob (2023-10-31 13:33:07+00:00): Thanks, rskedgell. You are right - I have just expressed a subjective opinion there without knowing the details of the tag. I will double check tomorrow when I am there and correct. Sorry, and thanks for pointing it out.
rskedgell (2023-10-31 14:47:33+00:00): Np problem, and thanks. It's one which seems to catch a lot of people out.
map per (2023-10-27 06:10:45+00:00): REVERTED
citrula (2023-11-14 16:49:56+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have corrected some of the tags on your business to conform with OSM standards. Feel free to ask me any questions you may have!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143163217
pio2_122 (2023-10-26 17:05:17+00:00): Ani adres, ani godziny otwarcia nie pokrywają się z oficjalnym profilem na facebooku.
eggie (2023-10-26 14:16:49+00:00): Dag Reinout..

Nieuwe gebouwen worden periodiek geïmporteerd incl adresnodes.
We tekeken in OSM niet zelf in.
Import kun je versnellen middels een verzoek op het forum van OSM.
Is het gebouw  op de vorige locatie gesloopt?
Je hebt dat verwijderd?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-10-26 14:21:28+00:00): Volgens het Kadaster bestaat het gebouw nog en is het in gebruik. Wanneer dat niet klopt kun je hier een terugmelding doen
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/?searchQuery=Kievitsweg+88d&objectId=0597010000273115&theme=BRT+Achtergrond&geometry.x=100893.27771813475&geometry.y=432781.23327265255&zoomlevel=12.519920451599868
eggie (2023-10-26 14:25:32+00:00): Voorlopig teruggedraaid door Wijzigingenset #143165068
Wanneer een school verhuist zal het gebouw toch niet opeens verdwenen zijn.
Graag wat meer info.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-10-26 15:04:55+00:00): De sportvelden heb ik actueel gemaakt.
De school uitgelijnd volgens de BAG.

MVG
eggie
Reinout van Schouwen (2023-10-26 15:14:54+00:00): Beste Eggie,
Het vorige gebouw bestaat inderdaad nog, ik heb denk ik een foutje gemaakt door het helemaal te verwijderen in plaats van de functie te veranderen (ik weet niet waar het nu voor dient).
De reden dat ik mijn wijziging indiende was dat GraphHopper me de verkeerde kant op stuurde toen ik naar deze school wilde navigeren. :)
eggie (2023-10-26 15:17:27+00:00): Ahh  Oke.. Zal nu niet meer gebeuren. 
Je hebt het weer actueel gemaakt.
GraphHopper heeft wel een paar dagen nodig voordat de routering weer uptodate is.

Groet
eggie
eggie (2023-10-26 15:20:57+00:00): Volgens de website van de school  is de basis kader afdeling nog steeds aan de Prinses Margrietstraat 163
Klopt dat?

MVG
eggie
Reinout van Schouwen (2023-10-26 15:33:58+00:00): Daar heb ik geen andere info over dan wat op de website/in de schoolgids staat, dus je mag ervan uitgaan van wel.
eggie (2023-10-26 16:17:37+00:00): Oke... Ik heb de basis kader afdeling op de adresnode gezet. 
In de description= staat de locatieafdeling.
Groet
eggie
prettyapathetic (2023-11-03 14:47:07+00:00): Hello, I removed a duplicate of Riverland Road SE that was created during this edit, please see: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143577494
NorthCrab_upload (2023-10-26 14:20:25+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8261935882
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/148327014

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Marek-M (2023-11-17 06:15:14+00:00): Cześć, z jakiego powodu na tym CPR https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/297946866 zmieniłeś highway=path na highway=footway? Jeżeli jest to ciąg pieszo-rowerowy, to highway=path było oznaczeniem prawidłowym. Jeżeli jest to chodnik z dopuszczonym ruchem rowerowym, to wtedy taguje się go jako  highway=footway+bicycle=yes - więcej informacji na Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Rowery#Deptaki
citrula (2023-11-14 16:48:24+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have corrected some of the tags on your business to conform with OSM standards. Feel free to ask me any questions you may have!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143164377
arjunaraoc (2024-01-08 11:34:24+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143164562
Filip009 (2023-10-27 21:04:52+00:00): Ahoj, žiadal si kontrolu tvojej sady zmien.

Keď pridávaš AlzaBox je jednoduchšie napísať do vyhľadávania AlzaBox. Takto ti to automaticky pridá skoro všetko potrebné.

Pokiaľ máš ďalšie otázky neváhaj Okomentovať tento changeset, alebo sa spýtaj v slovenskej OpenStreetMap komunite https://groups.google.com/g/osm_sk
woodpeck_repair (2023-10-26 14:18:08+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 143163629.
ian727 (2023-10-26 14:31:10+00:00): This is definitely not a secondary road! Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway to learn how to use the highway key!
ChristianA (2023-12-19 21:08:47+00:00): Hej. Den där vägen är inte "secondary". Tex de stora vägarna inne i Norrköping kan vara secondary, men inte en väg i skogen. 
Läs här tex: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dsecondary

Mvh
chris66 (2023-11-06 12:40:58+00:00): Hallo Datico,
vielen dank für das Eintragen von Laternen. Leider ist das Tagging nicht ganz Wiki-konform.

Richtig wäre: amenity=street_lamp zu verwenden.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE%3ATag%3Ahighway%3Dstreet_lamp

Gruß aus NRW
OSM_RogerWilco (2023-11-06 14:58:45+00:00): highway=street_lamp beschreibt die Lampe (amenity=street_lamp kenne ich nicht). Aber der Link ist richtig, den chris66 hinzugefügt hat.

Wenn man den Mast selber erfassen möchte brauch man beides: man_made=mast + highway=street_lamp. Ist aber nicht weit verbreitet beides zu erfassen. Aber immerhin fast 2.000 mal schon. :-)
chris66 (2023-11-06 15:14:27+00:00): Oops, verschrieben, sorry.
Unter highway=street_lamp verstehe ich die komplette Lampe inkl Mast.
eggie (2023-10-26 15:27:29+00:00): Dag PvMun  vraagt feedback  Lijkt me oke.
Dat wegdeel echt weggebroken? 
Wanneer die weg niet meer bestaat wat is daar voor in de plaats gekomen?
Je hebt anders kans dat een medemapper de toegangsweg weer intekent. 

MVG
eggie
SomeoneElse (2023-10-26 16:35:36+00:00): Didn't get back in time to add a comment, but would have been "Reverting a node to the last non-vandalised version, which includes some more recent well-meaning but invalid reverts "
Filip009 (2023-10-27 21:29:27+00:00): Ahoj, keď je niečo v rekonštrukcií do tagov sa to dáva ako highway construction a construction=tertiary aj keď sa jedná o rekonštrukciu mosta.
Langlaeufer (2023-10-26 16:35:13+00:00): Hallo Volker. 
grade1 (befestigt/versiegelt) und Kieselsteine als Oberfläche passen nicht zusammen? Was ist denn das Oberflächenmaterial hier.
Grüße Langläufer
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143165779
volker g (2023-10-27 05:45:28+00:00): Hallo Langläufer, vielen Dank. Ich hoffe jetzt passt es wieder.
Viele Grüße, Volker
Langlaeufer (2023-10-27 06:32:58+00:00): Hallo Volker.
Der Widerspruch war ja schon vor deinen Bearbeitungen da (da war es dirt und grade1) .
Kennst du die Oberfläche oder bist du dir ggf. sicher, das paved (asphalt oder Pflaster) ist.? 
Grüße
volker g (2023-10-27 06:58:36+00:00): Hallo Langläufer,
ich bin für längere Zeit nicht vor Ort, kann es leider nicht überprüfen.
Viele Grüße Volker
SomeoneElse (2023-10-26 19:05:39+00:00): Please DO NOT apply "osmi routing view fixes" while the revert of this data is ongoing.
ratrun (2023-10-27 04:58:04+00:00): Sorry, I thought it was finshed.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-12-20 12:47:46+00:00): amenity=storage ? Is it simply a shop=storage_rental? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%253Dstorage_rental Or is it selling boxes/packaging? Or for storing luggage?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1218547763
Fizzie-DWG (2024-01-08 03:44:40+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146013415
CjMalone (2023-11-23 16:52:19+00:00): Hey, unfortunately iD doesn't remove tags when a business changes, so you have to do it manually. I've fixed this one in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144377111#map=19/53.78471/-1.07010

https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/9641
Langlaeufer (2023-10-26 16:32:20+00:00): Hallo Volker,
bist du dir sicher mit (Schwerlast-)Betonplatten? Das wäre für eine Fußweg eher ungewöhnlich.
Oder sind es nicht vielleicht Gehwegplatten aus Beton die unter paving_stones fallen würden oder eine gegossene Betondecke (concrete) mit Dehnungsfugen?
Grüße Langläufer

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface%3Dpaving_stones
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface%3Dconcrete
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143166982
volker g (2023-10-27 05:58:41+00:00): Hallo Langläufer, habe ich falsch gemacht. Gut, dass du aufgepasst hast, vielen Dank !!
Viele Grüße, Volker
Langlaeufer (2023-10-27 06:29:50+00:00): Hallo Volker?
Was ist denn nun die Oberfläche? Können wir doch ruhig eintragen oder wissen wir nur, dass es besfestigt ist?
Grüße
volker g (2023-10-27 07:02:11+00:00): Hallo Langläufer, 
ich bin für längere Zeit nicht vor Ort u. kann es leider nicht überprüfen.
Viele Grüße, Volker
bxl-forever (2023-10-26 17:37:50+00:00): OK but next time please do not use aerial imagery to draw new buildings.  Even though they are orthophoto there is still some significant distorsion, only UrbIS numerical imagery is accepted as a source to draw building outlines.
I fixed it.
eggie (2023-10-26 15:52:08+00:00): Dag remkoo..
Probeer direct op de aanwezige adresnode bij te taggen..
Mvg
eggie
eggie (2023-10-26 18:02:00+00:00): Info samengevoegd met de adresnode
gr eggie
bxl-forever (2023-10-26 17:36:11+00:00): Reverted,.
Those are building structure built above streets, no reason to arbitrarily change their tags.
Tags have been restored.
Capello13 (2023-10-27 16:40:59+00:00): Bonsoir,

Pour représenter des pompes et des aspirateurs, je pense qu'au lieu d'utiliser amenity=car_wash il serait plus intéressant de tagger respectivement amenity=compressed_air et amenity=vacuum_cleaner
AntoElCrackito (2023-10-29 20:55:11+00:00): Je ne connaissais pas leur existence. C'est parfait !
bxl-forever (2023-10-26 17:33:25+00:00): Please do not delete nodes.  Keeping the history of objects is a founding principle of OSM.
Remove tags and set it as vacant instead.
Capello13 (2023-10-27 16:36:01+00:00): Bonsoir,

l'Allée de la Cornue passant à côté du restaurant universitaire est déjà en sens unique (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/693570946).

Que manque t'il pour représenter ce sens interdit ?
AntoElCrackito (2023-10-29 21:00:03+00:00): Bonsoir, 

En réalité, aucune des portions de l'Allée de la Cornue n'est à sens unique.
Seul un sens interdit est placé au point suivant :
45.81537, 1.22895
Il interdit le passage des véhicules venant du Sud (Côté opposé au Restaurant Universitaire).
Les personnes qui sortent des parkings collés au Restaurant Universitaire peuvent se diriger en direction de la faculté.

Je vous remercie de votre aide.
HaPe-CZ (2023-10-27 07:16:01+00:00): Ehi. Ehi. Le strade che portano a Piazza Vittorio Veneto sono davvero di seconda classe? La strada confluisce in via Po e non è di seconda classe. Pertanto, la strada che porta a Piazza Vittorio Veneto dovrebbe essere una rampa di accesso di 2a classe o semplicemente una strada.
igi77 (2023-10-27 20:08:00+00:00): Modifico con strada della stessa classificazione di via Po.
HaPe-CZ (2023-10-30 07:34:27+00:00): Ok
adiatmad (2023-10-31 09:04:32+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM. It appears that you've added some test data in OSM. Could you confirm if these are real objects? If not, would you mind double-checking and making any necessary corrections?

For example:
(https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1218563970)
(https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1218560662)
(https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1218562344)
dadavid (2023-11-21 23:57:33+00:00): Hi T-Witch, welcome to OSM and thank you for your contributions! I know it can be hard on mobile apps, but please make sure you are tagging addresses correctly! Pasting the entire address into addr:street is not correct, refer to the wiki for how to use addr:street, addr:housenumber and addr:city in order to add data that is useful to others. 
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:addr:*
if you have any questions, feel free to dm me 

David
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143169424
MxxCon (2023-10-27 06:56:09+00:00): Hello.
Once again I ask that you please connect crosswalks to their intersecting roads and the intersection nodes must have the correct tags as well.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143169783
user_177389 (2023-10-26 17:33:55+00:00): don't do that again -> reverted
user_177389 (2023-10-26 17:33:50+00:00): don't do that again -> reverted
user_177389 (2023-10-26 17:33:44+00:00): don't do that again -> reverted
user_177389 (2023-10-26 17:33:38+00:00): don't do that again -> reverted
jodd (2024-06-02 11:02:10+00:00): Hallo,
im Hinwies https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4229758 hat ein Mapper vermerkt, dass er das vor Ort keine Hinweise auf euer Geschäft in der Schumannstraße 27 gesehen hat.
Gibt es euer Geschäft hier noch?
Danke für eine kurze Rückmeldung.
VG Jo
jodd (2024-07-13 17:18:39+00:00): Hi,
I checked it again. I couldn't find any storage shop. That's why I deleted the POI.
Jo
eggie (2023-10-26 18:32:46+00:00): Dag Jee...

Waarom zet je het pad op access=no
Dat betekent verboden toegang.
Access no icm  andere accesstags is bijna altijd fout.
Kijk je nog even?

Mvg
eggie
eggie (2023-10-26 19:24:38+00:00): Het pad komt uit op een weg die op access=private staat. Daar zal het ook niet verder routeren.
Daar staat geen foot=permissive 
Dat zou je kunnen toevoegen.. mits je er mag wandelen.
MVG
eggie
SomeoneElse (2023-10-26 19:24:42+00:00): Didn't get back in time to add a comment, but would have been "Reverting a node to the last non-vandalised version, which includes some more recent well-meaning but invalid reverts "
gscholz (2023-10-27 06:48:11+00:00): Hi Peter,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=9.76871&lat=55.52637&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=143170954

Obviously you have moved sections of the E 20/M40 significantly. Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
osmviborg (2023-10-27 07:51:39+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143197942
gscholz (2023-10-27 06:51:46+00:00): Hi Naya Kabir,
your recent changesets again have left behind a bunch of errors in the OSm database regarding duplicate nodes:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=26.84472&lat=58.58851&zoom=8&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this? Can you please also think about, how to avoid this systematical error?
Kind regards
Guido
woodpeck_repair (2023-12-14 09:30:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145103736 where the changeset comment is: revert von edits einer Sockenpuppe des gesperrten beautifulplaces, s. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15485
mueschel (2023-11-04 12:17:12+00:00): Hi,
please make sure that the spelling of your keys is correct. Among the added addresses in this region I found a huge number of spelling mistakes. Here are a few examples:

Addr:housenumber2
adddr:street:en
addr:Street:en
addr:hosuenumber2
addr:housennmber2
addr:housenumbe2
addr:housenumber2
addr:housenumeber2
addr:housenumeber
addr:housenumebr2
addr:housenumer2
addr:houseumber2
addr:houseumber:en
addr:housneumber2
addr:housunumber2
addr:placet:en
addr:steet:en
addr:stree:en
addr:street:En
addr:streetn:en
addr;housenumber2
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-01-24 08:46:00+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11291515069/history - is shop=clothes best fitting?

Maybe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Doutpost would fit better if that is place that has meager supply of products (or none) but allows pick up of orderer products?
dieterdreist (2023-10-26 22:23:56+00:00): Ciao, sembra che hai cancellato 2 vie, era quello che intendevi?
dieterdreist (2023-10-26 22:30:03+00:00): I have reverted this changeset because it looks like vandalism.
Adrian_N (2023-11-09 17:59:21+00:00): Salut! Pare că modificarea asta a șters și denumirile străzilor. Ai putea rectifica?
alexnder (2023-11-09 18:15:17+00:00): Fixed
osmviborg (2023-10-26 18:32:07+00:00): Jeg kan forstå at du tagger hovedfærdselsåren med Etymology; men alle disse private indkørsler, det giver ikke, i min optik, mening.
Peter Brodersen (2023-10-26 18:48:03+00:00): Hvis de private indkørsler har navnet Holstebrovej og er i nærheden af en Holstebrovej, så må de være opkaldt efter Holstebro.

Spørgsmålet er nok snarere, om de private indkørsler overhovedet i første omgang officielt hedder Holstebrovej.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-10-26 18:00:29+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/388800552

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Michał Mrowiec (2023-10-26 18:42:36+00:00): Cześć, dzięki! Ulica jest poprawna, jestem tego pewny. Usunąłem tylko "ul.", ponieważ nie podaje tego wskazana instrukcja opisywania adresów. Pozdrowienia!
NorthCrab (2023-10-26 22:06:44+00:00): Tak, chodziło tutaj o usunięcie "ul." :-) Pozdrawiam!
mavl (2024-11-13 08:50:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159081298 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible sources - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16857].
DaveF (2023-10-27 13:06:22+00:00): Please don't introduce inaccuracies into the OSM database.
gscholz (2023-10-28 06:07:21+00:00): Hi Alixun,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-7.95820&lat=31.75523&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=143175870

Especially way 1218601952 is affected here:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1218601952

Can you please fix this?

I recommend to use JOSMs internal validator to avoid such errors.

Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2023-10-31 07:11:48+00:00): Hi Alixun, 
this error still exits, can I get your feedback here?
Guido
Boyan Alexiev (2023-10-26 19:31:12+00:00): Hello Melissa,
Thank you for mapping and working on the project! 

Please refer to this wiki page for the name key:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name

In short, if you don't know for a fact that this is the real name of the street - i.e. is known to locals, has signs visible on street imagery or you have personally surveyed the area, then it's best to not add the tag, as it could cause confusion.

We're all learning; let's make some beautiful maps as we go! BR
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143176011
maro21 (2023-10-27 15:57:55+00:00): You're asking to review your edits and I'm asking what did you mean by this edit?
bouzinac (2023-10-28 15:38:02+00:00): Was a typo : the line currenty exists in fact
eggie (2023-10-26 20:27:28+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Aleks-Berlin (2023-10-27 11:48:01+00:00): Hallo T.,
bitte schreibe es so:
wikimedia_commons=File:Name.jpg (nicht http..),
Details hier: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:wikimedia%20commons?uselang=de#Allgemeiner_Fehler
MfG, A.
tscheche (2023-10-27 20:49:01+00:00): Hallo,
danke für den Hinweis, wurde bei uns in der Community auch schon darauf hingewiesen.
Ihr seid aber echt schnell und aufmerksam. :-D
Musst das ganze procedere technisch und zeitlich nur in 2 Teile teilen von Tag image in wikimedia_commons und dann die url über einen anderen weg den Teil File: extrahdieren und in OSM einarbeiten.

Erledigt
MxxCon (2023-10-27 07:42:48+00:00): Hello.
When mapping crosswalks it is extremely important to accurately map what type of crosswalk it is, traffic lights, stop sign or unmarked. Similarly, it is very important to connect crosswalks to their intersecting roads and the intersection node to have accurate tags.
Finally, please try to position curb nodes where they actually are on the satellite imagery rather than just roughly somewhere on the corner. Accurate curb location is helpful for the navigation/guidance for the visually-impaired people.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143177792
map per (2023-10-27 06:10:38+00:00): REVERTED