piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
treestryder (2023-09-02 15:30:54+00:00): Sorry, I've been busy.

Many of the highway classifications are a routing hierarchy. They say little about type of road and more about the road's importance in the network. (I see the Michigan wiki page could use some clarification on this topic.)
motorway > trunk > primary > secondary > tertiary

I labeled only the section right off from the freeway as "primary", which anything off from a freeway could easily be.

You are welcome to change it.

We could also discuss it with others at the next monthly meeting.

I also have my eye on the road through Island Lake State Recreation area. The National Park Service says if it were in their parks, it would be a tertiary or secondary.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/US_National_Park_Service_Tagging:_Roads#Type_of_Road
rhtb0 (2023-08-19 08:51:03+00:00): 국지도 지위이지만 자동차 전용도로로서 혁신도시까지 모든 구간이 입체화가 완료되어 있다. 따라서 금천~화순 구간 진척에 따라 장기적으로 일부 개량 및 관리주체 변경을 통해 고속도로에 편입될 가능성이 있다.
adreamy (2023-09-07 09:08:25+00:00): 도로의 속성 지정과 관련해서 커뮤니티의 합의와 OSM 위키의 내용에 따라 주시기를 바랍니다.
자동차전용도로는 'motorroad=yes'로 표시하고 있으며, (여전히 몇 가지 논란이 있지만)몇 가지 요건을 갖추었다고 임의로 고속화도로로 보기는 어렵습니다.
커뮤니티에서 함께 논의하고 결정해 주시기를 바랍니다.
rhtb0 (2023-09-07 09:46:42+00:00): 남광산 ~ 양촌 구간이 광주외곽순환고속도로로 지정되어 있습니다. 따라서 고속화도로로 볼수 있습니다. 또한 광주외곽순환망에 속하는 도로입니다.
rhtb0 (2023-09-07 09:48:40+00:00): https://i.namu.wiki/i/3SbyBLp1NsNr4fQvOixqMU3KH8C133uNat4NJCRGukO5Wv5SQfGGMqYXCWCyi42Ar4p5fJNgLH7WvOkh1MJh0DumJM26uJatCfxLrUw2ZWZS3qBLoSOYLhXoWXgsUnQebyTegJPkKgZHmZs7Za8vbg.webp
1구간에 빛가람장성로가 포함되어 있습니다.
rhtb0 (2023-09-07 09:51:07+00:00): https://redusx.bitbucket.io/roads/map.html
여기와 비슷한 다른 도로망들은 고속화도로에 조건을 충분히 갖추고 있습니다. 만약 사이트에 해당하는 자동차전용도로가 trunk 태그가 아니면 이 태그는 사용해야 할 곳은 많지 않을겁니다. 그러면 제주도에는 고속화도로 태그를 지정할 곳은 없습니다.
rhtb0 (2023-09-07 09:55:02+00:00): 고속화도로 태그를 사용하는 곳이 한정적이라 그 비중은 비교적 적을 겁니다.
rhtb0 (2023-09-07 09:57:24+00:00): 고속도로와 비슷한 입체교차로, 제한속도가 일반도로보다 높은 80-90km, 유료 도로 구간이 존재, 차선이 비교적 넓다는 특성은 충분히 지정할 만합니다.
rhtb0 (2023-09-07 10:01:11+00:00): https://redusx.bitbucket.io/roads/map.html
적어도 여기에 있는 자동차전용도로의 구간은 그렇게 많지 않습니다. 다른 곳은 아니더라도 자동차전용도로만 고속화도로 태그를 지정하는 것이 저는 문제없다고 생각합니다. 고속도로처럼 톨게이트를 갖춘 유로도로 구간도 있습니다. 고속도로와 같이 자동차전용도로 표지판과 오토바이 통행금지 표지판도 있습니다.
rhtb0 (2023-09-07 10:05:11+00:00): 자동차전용도로는 실질적으로 고속화도로입니다.
adreamy (2023-09-07 10:48:51+00:00): 1. 일부 구간이 '광주외곽순환고속도로'로 지정되어 있으므로 고속화도로라는 것은 무슨 말씀이신지 이해를 못 했습니다.
2. 제주도에는 고속화도로가 없습니다.
https://namu.wiki/w/%EA%B3%A0%EC%86%8D%ED%99%94%EB%8F%84%EB%A1%9C
현재 고속화도로로 지정된 길은 모두 평면교차로를 가지고 있습니다.
3. 말씀하신 하나하나의 요건은 상대적인 기준은 되나 결정적 기준은 되지 못합니다.(그렇다고 해서 아니라는 뜻은 아닙니다.) 보기를 들어 '자동차전용도로' 표지는 자동차전용도로임을 나타내는 뚜렷한 기준이지만 그것이 곧 고속화도로는 아닌 것과 같다고 할 것입니다.
4. 결론적으로 몇 가지 기준을 가지고 각자가 임의로 판단하는 것이 아니라 객관적인 기준이나 합의가 필요하다는 것입니다.
rhtb0 (2023-09-07 11:32:15+00:00): 1. 빛가람장성로 남광산 ~ 양촌 구간이 광주외곽순환고속도로로 지정되어 있습니다. https://namu.wiki/w/%ED%8C%8C%EC%9D%BC:%EA%B4%91%EC%A3%BC%EC%99%B8%EA%B3%BD%EC%88%9C%ED%99%98%EA%B3%A0%EC%86%8D%EB%8F%84%EB%A1%9C%20%EC%9C%84%EC%B9%98%EB%8F%84.jpg
2. 고속화도로 태그 지정은 나무위키의 고속화도로 목록에 해당하는 도로만 속하고 나머지 도로는 아닌것인가요? osm 위키에 1차~3차 도로 항목에도 70km 이상인 도로는 고속화도로 태그를 사용한다고 적혀 있습니다.
adreamy (2023-09-07 11:42:27+00:00): 1. 아시다시피 고속도로는 고속도로로 지정하면 됩니다.
2. 고속화도로가 도로 분류가 아니다 보니 논란이 많은 것이 사실입니다.
하지만 어쨋거나 단순히 몇 가지 요소만 가지고 고속화도로를 임의로 판단하는 것은 여러가지 문제가 있습니다. 실제로 짧은 구간으로 봤을 때에는 고속화도로의 요건을 가진 도로들이 많습니다. 말씀하신 제주도의 도로들이 그런 경우들입니다.(하지만 분명히 그 도로 구간 가운데 일부에는 평면교차로가 있어 요건에 해당하지 않는다는 것을 알 수 있습니다. 하지만 전체를 다 살피지 않는다면 틀릴 수 밖에 없습니다.)
말씀하신 것처럼 평면교차로나 속도 같은 것은 필요조건이지 충분조건이 아닙니다.(즉 고속화도로는 입체교차로나 속도-예외 있음- 조건이 필요하지만 그런 조건을 갖추었다고 모두 고속화도로는 아니라는 말씀입니다.)
@Wqhc 같이 왕성한 편집을 하시는 분이 커뮤니티에 오셔서 경험을 공유한다면 좀더 명확한 기준을 합의하는 데에 큰 도움이 될 것입니다.
rhtb0 (2023-09-07 11:51:47+00:00): 잘 알겠습니다. 그러면 고속화도로가 아닌 1차 도로나 2차 도로가 맞는것 같습니다.
rhtb0 (2023-09-07 11:55:28+00:00): 그렇다면 강변북로, 올림픽대로, 북부간선로, 내부순환로, 동부간선도로, 분당수서로, 성남이천로도 고속화도로 태그가 적절하지 않는것 같습니다.
silversurfer83 (2023-08-23 14:03:19+00:00): please stop it

another double entry. removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140278256
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140079677
sannkc (2023-08-19 04:07:01+00:00): For additional evidence to support these changes, see the comments on  changeset #139226488
Frans S (2023-08-19 14:32:58+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key. You did not square all the buildings you have mapped.
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140079900
silversurfer83 (2023-08-23 14:01:46+00:00): another double entry. removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140278200
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140080124
silversurfer83 (2023-08-23 14:00:37+00:00): another double entry. Removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140278091
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140080141
MxxCon (2023-08-22 03:43:13+00:00): Hello.
Since feature is located in an area where English is the local language tag name:en= can be just name=.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140080163
juliencherry (2023-08-22 04:11:21+00:00): Corrected.
Warin61 (2023-08-30 01:20:02+00:00): Hi,

addr:street should have the same capitalization as the associated highway, in this case "Guinea Street" not "Guinea street"
mariotomo (2023-08-26 09:46:34+00:00): hi. your comment "Peak." does not correspond to the action (improving orthography of names) nor explain why you changed name to the multiply named https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9445962517/history.
mariotomo (2023-08-19 07:55:50+00:00): hey. any hope you ever start describing your edits? like "corrected capitalization based on linguistic considerations.", instead of "Peak."
verb-object-further details.
not just 'entity', as you keep doing.
MxxCon (2023-08-22 03:47:11+00:00): Hello.
When mapping, please pay attention not to accidentally drag some feature out of place like you did here with a playground.

I fixed it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140081204
martien-176 (2023-08-19 19:12:40+00:00): Hi,  thanks for mapping. You requested a review of your mappings. 

Your buildings are well mapped. Good location, square corners and precise outline. 

You can improve though by avoiding mapping several buildings as one building. Every building must be traced separately, even if they are very close to each other.

Thanks and regards, Martien, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140081304
aixbrick (2023-08-19 08:03:58+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OSM,
der ist bereits erfasst: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/74864595.
Gruß
balkonbewohner (2023-08-19 17:07:13+00:00): Hallo, danke für den Hinweis. 
Muss ich irgendwie übersehen haben. 
Dann schaue ich später mal das ich das gelöscht kriege. 👍
aixbrick (2023-08-20 07:37:30+00:00): Löschen hat offenbar geklappt, danke. :-)
gendy54 (2023-08-21 21:49:17+00:00): Pour tout ce que tu va rajouter, les tags addr:city et addr:postcode sont inutiles, car toutes les limites administratives sont déjà tracées. On sait donc déjà dans quel ensemble géographique se situent les objets.
CurlingMan13 (2023-08-19 08:20:48+00:00): Psartial overlaps of areas were resolved.
mp747474 (2023-08-19 13:15:57+00:00): das Café gibt es glaube ich gar nicht mehr, da das Architekturmuseum am Schaumainkai wegen Renovierungsarbeiten geschlossen ist. Die Webseite verlinkt auf ein anderes Café, das mit dem hier gar nichts zu tun hat. Ich lösche deshalb das Café.
wakosoft (2023-08-21 08:50:32+00:00): Okay danke. War mir so nicht bewusst.
Hedaja (2023-08-19 09:41:34+00:00): Hallo waterman
ich kann nachvollziehen, dass das hier ärgerlich sein kann. Aber du hast mit der Änderung Dinge verschlimmbessert. Zwar können jetzt keinen normalen Navis mehr da lang (wäre interessant bei welchen das Problem auftritt) jedoch kann es auch nicht mehr in den NAvis von Einsatzkräften verwendet werden. DIe wissen sicher dass man den nutzen kann, aber ich stelle es mir verwirrend vor, wenn mich das Navi bis ich über die Trennstelle hinweg bin versucht zur Fähre zu schicken.
Ich würde empfehlen die Änderung rückgängig zu machen und die entsprechenden AUswerter die probleme bereiten anzuschreiben. Kann da auch gern behilflich sein.

Grüße
Christian
Hedaja (2023-08-19 09:50:22+00:00): Ich habe mal ein paar Router getestet Alle online Router die über osm.org verfügbar sind und OpenRouteService finden entweder keine Routeroder nutzen die Fähre. Magic Earth nutzt die Bahn über den Damm, aber nicht den Rettungsweg.
Das sind erstmal alle die ich testen konnte
scai (2023-08-19 16:02:29+00:00): Mich interessiert sehr, welche Apps über access=no (und emergency=yes) routen. Das klingt völlig kaputt. Kannst du bitte Beispiele nennen? Auftrennen ist sicherlich keine Lösung, wie sollen OSM-basierte Rettungs-Navis jetzt hier entlang kommen? Springen ist für die meisten Fahrzeuge schwierig.
SomeoneElse (2023-08-19 09:12:22+00:00): The wrong account was used for this; should have been https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/SomeoneElse_Revert
mcliquid (2023-08-19 18:33:04+00:00): Danke :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140085557
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-08-03 15:01:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 154777753 where the changeset comment is: Revert some fantasy mapping, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140607294
paganella31 (2023-08-21 07:03:49+00:00): Hi AtseYo!
May I ask you if you checked the place on site? The cycleway is closed for construction works until October, see https://www.ufficiostampa.provincia.tn.it/content/view/full/232231

The cycleway is already marked with access=no, but some routers still suggest taking that path. So having the gate in place ensures that users are correctly redirected towards the deviation in Ravina.

At least two weeks ago it wasn't possible to pass through the gate with any means of transport. They might have reopened the track, but so far I didn't read any news about that.
AtseYo (2023-08-21 09:09:03+00:00): Hi paganella31! 
Thank you so much for the comment, and apologies, I did not consider the temporary closure!! I have been here before (but not very recent) and passed through, so since I saw no indication of the temporary nature of the closure, I incorrectly assumed the closure was erroneous. I have reverted the change.
paganella31 (2023-08-23 12:04:28+00:00): Thanks. I added a note on the gate itself, so that it's clearer
Frans S (2023-08-20 10:38:08+00:00): Hello, Thanks for mapping.
Please focus on required objects.
Natural areas, which spans a bigger area than a task square, are not to be mapped on TM projects.
Best regards and keep mapping
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-05 03:33:49+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11127158664/history has vending_machine = excrement_bags that was added in this edit
Is it just less-used duplicate of vending=excrement_bags ?
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:amenity%253Dvending_machine

Is there any reason to not change to more widely used key?
map per (2023-08-25 10:05:54+00:00): Hallo Graschki,

gibt es die Hausnummer 15 hier wirklich nicht mehr?

Danke und viele Grüße
map per
Graschki (2023-08-25 10:18:37+00:00): Die gab es in der Tat noch nie, war dann auch gar nicht so leicht für Telekom, Post usw
map per (2023-08-25 10:44:01+00:00): Danke, und gibt es dort wirklich ein Ladengeschäft oder verkauft ihr nur über den Online Shop?
SomeoneElse (2023-08-19 09:12:12+00:00): The wrong account was used for this; should have been https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/SomeoneElse_Revert
user_5359 (2023-08-19 09:52:13+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I remove your SEO SPAM entry (mostly foreign keys).
DD1GJ (2023-08-20 14:28:02+00:00): Hallo Ragnar78,

willkommen bei OSM. Dein "geändert" besteht leider hauptsächlich aus dem Löschen von realen Dingen wie der Zufahrt zum Tannenhof oder dem Gülletank. Daher habe ich den vorherigen Zustand wieder hergestellt. Solche Wege sind wichtig, da u.a. Rettungsdienste in den Fahrzeugen und in den Leitstellen verstärkt die Daten von OSM nutzen. Sollte es Probleme mit "Durchgangsverkehr" geben und keine allgemeine Wegerechte bestehen, so besteht die Möglichkeit, den Weg als "privat" (access=private) zu markieren, so dass er von den Routingprogrammen ignoriert wird. Weitere Informationen zu OSM findest Du z.B. bei 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access

Falls der Pfad im Spitzenäcker nicht mehr existieren sollte, dann kann er mit einem aussagekräftigen Änderungssatzkommentar natürlich gelöscht werden.

Viele Grüße, Joachim
archpdx (2023-08-27 13:33:20+00:00): fyi it looks like this was reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140436350
橘ヒカリ (2023-10-17 11:06:45+00:00): 您好，北京局范围内的铁路信息以及相关数据是按照工务段规范命名的，请勿随便更改。这条线就叫邯黄线，没有邢黄线这个说法。
橘ヒカリ (2023-10-17 11:50:40+00:00): Reverted in 142709380
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140088208
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2023-10-17 13:45:14+00:00): 但是从互联网检索来看，”邢黄线/邢黄铁路“这个名称确实有很广泛的在被传播，”邢黄线/邢黄铁路“指代的是实质上的邯黄线吗？如果是的话是否可以考虑alt_name?
橘ヒカリ (2023-10-17 22:40:29+00:00): 我认为可以，但是不建议。
kornad (2024-01-04 12:21:17+00:00): Witam, prośba o większą uwagę przy mapowaniu - znaczniki użyte w Twojej edycji dla budynku zajezdni są błędne, nie powinno się ich stosować do budynku, lecz do terenu zajezdni. Poprawiłem: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145878081
macaddr (2024-01-04 22:03:02+00:00): Fakt, sorki. Musiałem się pospieszyć przy edytowaniu i zasugerować tym, że budynek miał nazwę. Następnym razem dwa razy sprawdzę przed zmianami :)
eggie (2023-08-19 16:30:47+00:00): Hi Bonbini... Please use the present addressnode to tag on.
No need to add an address.
And also the tag for this Waterlab. tourism=gallery? 

Greetz,
eggie
Bonboni (2023-08-20 09:37:25+00:00): Hello Eggie,

I'm not very experienced with this platform and I hope you can help me.

As far as I can tell I've added the information to the address at Voorsterweg 32, and didn't add a new entry? Can you somehow fix this, or tell me what to do?

I'll add the tag.
eggie (2023-08-20 09:47:03+00:00): Hi Bonboni...

It's no problem to leave it this way.
Only the consensus is to tag at the addressnode. 
Your tagging is not a wrong, but somthing is missing.
If I merge your info with the addressnode I have to know what the maintagging has to be of Het Waterlab..  
Otherwise no rendering on the map.
It's like Fletcher Hotel-Restaurant Marknesse... The maintag is tourism=hotel...

Now the question
name=Het Waterlab
?=?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:craft%3Datelier

tourism=gallery
shop=art  ?

That will render on the map with an icon.
Greetz,
eggie
Bonboni (2023-08-20 09:52:14+00:00): Hey Eggie,

I just submitted another change that contains the opening times and some extra tags as you've requested.

Yes, please merge it with the address node.

The main tag can be gallery.

Thanks a lot for your help!
Bonboni (2023-08-20 09:53:02+00:00): Can we also add the website? It's https://hetwaterlab.nl/
eggie (2023-08-20 10:15:27+00:00): 
It's no problem to leave your tagging on the building because 'Het Waterlab' is also the historic buildingname.
I added the website.
I removed parking=yes from the building. 

You may add an amenity=parking outside on an area or a node.
Up to you.
Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2023-08-20 10:16:24+00:00): CTRL-F5  to see your edits rendering.
Bonboni (2023-08-20 14:41:17+00:00): Ok so, we don't have to merge it with the address? The address is for this building only.
eggie (2023-08-20 15:57:51+00:00): It s no problem ... 😀
NorthCrab_upload (2023-08-19 10:30:23+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1199752375

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2023-08-19 10:30:22+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/799227102

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-24 02:47:46+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11127312133/history

what you tried to map here?

what kind of auctions are here?
dankarran (2026-01-18 12:33:19+00:00): I accidentally re-added these buildings, but have since removed them again and left some more details on the site - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177371163

If you get a chance, please could you check it over to make sure it reflects reality correctly?
limes11 (2023-09-01 18:57:56+00:00): Hi,

angeblich schon wieder frei?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3863070

Falls diese Geschwindigkeitsbegrenzungen nur zwei Wochen gelten, dann bitte nicht erfassen. Ab mindestens 3 Monate ist ein Richtwert.

Viele Grüße Limes
Frans S (2023-08-19 13:25:46+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
You mapped a few narrow traces as an unclassified road. That is too much honor for a very small trace. 
I retagged it to path

You know the the open topo map imagery? That shows the elevations of an area. Usefull to find the direction of the flow.
Best regards.
Tarcizio Kalaundi (2023-08-19 13:42:01+00:00): Thank you for the correction and the Topo map imagery recommendation, i did not know about that option.
ZeLonewolf (2025-06-23 00:53:24+00:00): This change was reverted due to the presence of a posted no trespassing sign.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167979764
martinst (2024-01-17 20:50:26+00:00): Hallo erdwich,
bei name= werden nur Eigennamen eingetragen, siehe OSM-Wiki.
Gruß Martin
BrackoNe (2023-08-20 18:49:03+00:00): Poštovani,

Nisam u mogućnosti iz raspoloživih izvora da potvrdim da se na ovoj poziciji nalazi bilo koji objekat. Da li možete da potvrdite za isti kako ga ne bih uklonio.

Pozdrav,
Nemanja
MihailoT (2023-08-21 13:14:27+00:00): Poštovani Nemanja, imam fotografije. Kako biste želeli da ih prosledim?
BrackoNe (2023-08-21 13:18:40+00:00): Može na bilo koji sajt koji hostuje slike, npr. https://app.prntscr.com/en/index.html

Ovo nije jedini sajt, niti ga favorizujem, prvi koji se pojavio u pretrazi. :)
MihailoT (2023-08-21 16:50:05+00:00): https://ibb.co/gRtqcPC
https://ibb.co/S6g952r
BrackoNe (2023-08-22 07:03:46+00:00): Hvala na potvrdi!
Dodko (2023-08-20 17:47:10+00:00): Dedinské potraviny sa značia
shop=convenience
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:shop%3Dconvenience

shop=supermarket
je veľký obchod typu Tesco, Billa, Lidl
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:shop%3Dsupermarket
NorthCrab_upload (2023-08-19 12:10:17+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11127413761

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
LockOnGuy (2023-08-19 12:44:01+00:00): Hello, Elhamn1992 I previously asked you to add good changeset comments to your edits. Please do not just add "(no comment)" as that's not helpful and will not make other mappers understand what you edited, please see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments      
Also, please try to keep your edits local like upload your edit before jumping to the other side of the map to edit again.    
Thank you and best regards.
user_5359 (2023-08-21 05:45:10+00:00): Hello! Please take a look on http://www.osm.org/way/605699478. What is the mean the key etsc. Did you mean railway:etcs? also see http://www.osm.org/way/1199773875, http://www.osm.org/way/1199773874. You miss the prefix railway for etcs and pzb.
BáthoryPéter (2026-06-01 11:05:24+00:00): Szentantalfa és Balatoncsicsó között a HÉSZ-nek higyjünk vagy a Lechnernek?
vasony (2026-06-01 11:15:20+00:00): Hol van eltérés? oeny hrsz rétegen mi van?
BáthoryPéter (2026-06-01 11:31:31+00:00): Két helyen. A Kőhegynél Szentantalfa kapott, Csicsó pedig a lakott terület határán, a focipályánál.
https://nta.lechnerkozpont.hu/terkep#544805-175875-10000
Az OÉNY HRSZ keresője a Lechneres verziót támasztja alá.
vasony (2026-06-01 20:45:39+00:00): El lett cserélve, 25/2021 határozat:
https://szentantalfa.hu/2021/jegyzokonyvek/a-210425-kivonatok-24-25.pdf

pl. 
- Szentantalfa 029/17 átkerült Balatoncsicsóhoz (0258 lett), 
- cserébe a Balatoncsicsó 0102/3 > Szentantalfa 0206 csere volt

A régi OKIR-es telekhatáros rétegen még a régi hrsz. látszik, az oeny-en az új.
BáthoryPéter (2026-06-01 20:56:20+00:00): Köszi!
Az új INSPIRE/Lechner közighatárokat ellenőrzöm. Eddig minden eltérésnél a Lechner tűnt helyesnek.
vasony (2026-06-02 20:06:04+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183562836

talán így jobb
Frans S (2023-08-19 13:13:09+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings need to be improved to meet the quality standards of HOTOSM.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document for more info)
A: E: Inaccurate mapped and / or not squared.
* Tagging of buildings. For HOTOSM projects, the standard tagging is 'building=yes' No text adding.  Please keep that in mind at further mappings.

Please use the Open topo Map imagery to see where the flow of the waterways goes.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140092855
NorthCrab_upload (2023-08-19 12:40:22+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11127475311

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Awoobis (2023-08-19 14:07:29+00:00): Rossman shop=cosmetics
Awoobis (2023-08-19 14:07:41+00:00): Atm do poprawy
I miod malina
Awoobis (2023-08-19 14:08:28+00:00): Wejscia
Awoobis (2023-08-20 17:20:00+00:00): poprawione
augil (2023-08-19 12:35:12+00:00): sınırlar böyle bir esnada cadde ve sokaklarla belirlenmemelidir.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-13 03:13:21+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141187206
OSM_RogerWilco (2023-08-20 08:43:59+00:00): Moin DCA!

die Straßennamen waren wir auch mal vor Ort aufgefallen. Die Namen sind ja nicht offiziell. Ich frage mich, ob es daher besser ist diese Namen als "loc_name" zu erfassen.

Unabhängig davon müsstest Du noch das noname=yes von den Straßen löschen, die nun doch einen Namen haben.

Viele Grüße
Roger Wilco
OSM_RogerWilco (2023-08-20 08:44:52+00:00): Siehe hier: https://suedkampen.de/suedkampen/aktuelles