piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Gregory Peony (2025-12-15 00:13:43+00:00): Thank you for your contribution! 

It looks like you mapped some buidlings here, but they could be more accurate.

After tracing and tagging features which are likely square or round, please remember to square their corners `q`, or circularise them `o`, because it is almost impossible and time consuming to draw shapes so percisely manually. Buildings with metal or pitched roofs tend to have square corners; round buildings are identifiable by the distinctive cresent shaped shadow they cast. Unless the building is clearly a different shape then it's best to assume that it should be rounded or its corners should be squared. In the ID Editor, you can `right click` for access to editing functions. Since roofs tend to overhang walls trace the initial shape slightly smaller to allow a buffer for any change in size which may occur. In JOSM use the [buildingstools plugin](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/BuildingsTools). In ID you must draw the shape accurately enough if you want every corner to be squared. This [video about squaring features in ID](https://youtu.be/Xs5wX592E1o) has more information and a demo.

Keep on mapping!
Gregory Peony (2025-12-15 00:16:11+00:00): Thank you for your contribution! 

Some of the footprints you added here represent yards.

Each footprint should represent a building. Please watch [this video about imagery interpretation](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJ-vUwtS3A8). Sometimes buildings may appear to share a common wall, but this is sometimes an illusion; only map them with shared nodes if you have reason to believe that they really do touch.

Keep on mapping!
Amguid (2026-06-04 13:32:02+00:00): Ya Kelb, Khamedj, why did you delete it?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5529489521
Amguid (2026-06-04 13:26:36+00:00): Kelb, Khamedj, vandale, why did you delete it?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1033320720
Comino (2025-11-18 20:30:20+00:00): Hi,

In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes".

Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag !
Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead.

For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Merchants#tagging-guidance
and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bitcoin

Please also update the node with address, phone number, opening hours etc.

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
https://btcmap.org/tagger/6794624
SomeoneElse (2025-11-23 12:27:20+00:00): Any reason why you've gone with amenity rather than man_made for these?  Previously there were 70 uniquely man_made https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2g2d and 45 uniquely amenity https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2g2c , and 16 both https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2g2f .  There are now 234 amenity, but the wiki page is against man_made https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aman_made%3Dmounting_block
I don't mind either way (I've always shown both) but some people do get sniffy about creating more things under amenity :)
b-unicycling (2025-11-28 22:26:01+00:00): I meant to write a diary post about this decision, but I haven't gotten round to it. I mentioned it in one of my last videos, but of course I cannot expect you to watch all of these on the odd chance that I will explain myself.
SomeoneElse (2025-12-01 23:24:19+00:00): (for completeness - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/b-unicycling/diary/407814 )
Thanks!
Yog Sot (2025-11-19 21:59:37+00:00): przeciez ludzie chodzą...
trigpoint (2026-04-14 18:20:43+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/181336246
rempshaener (2025-11-23 21:37:57+00:00): Hallo,
auch hier gelten die Anmerkungen der vorherigen Changesets.
Auf Grund des Alters der Daten - wenn denn survey:date stimmt - hoffe ich, dass die Daten eigenständig erhoben wurden und es sich nicht um einen Import handelt, vgl.  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines bzw. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct
Viele Grüße
Glassman (2025-11-18 21:39:51+00:00): I don't think natural=grasslands is appropriate. It is more for natural areas of wild grass. You might want landuse=grass
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174827450
Jarek 🚲 (2025-11-18 19:02:32+00:00): oops, sorry for the large bounding box, i didn't notice i also dragged the one node in Oakville
kaleidoscopica (2025-12-02 21:24:28+00:00): I believe this is actually a river - per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Dstream a stream can be jumped across by an "active, able-bodied person". By this definition, very few streams are visible on aerial imagery, and conversely the vast majority of named waterways in Texas are actually rivers. At least, that is my understanding.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-11-18 22:12:43+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Witosa":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13314501885
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13314501886
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1349789978

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Przemysław69 (2025-11-23 13:50:19+00:00): Solved: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175026776

Thanks
Glassman (2025-11-18 21:40:36+00:00): You might want to draw the outline of the building
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174827930
smeòrach (2026-05-10 19:18:24+00:00): Chan ionnann eadar-theangachadh agus ainm a tha ga-rìribh ann an cleachdadh. Dè as ciall dha "Muileann Bhaile Ìosaig" a chur air Boysack Mills, ainm nach dàinig riamh roimhe à beul duine geal, agus mìltean thar mhìltean de dh'ainmean Gàidhlig air a' Ghàidhealtachd nach eil air OSM idir? Chanainn-sa gu bheil àsan uile-gu-lèir nas deatamaiche.

Tha mi air a bhith rannsachadh tùs ainmean Siorrachd Aonghais fad còrr is deich bliadhna, ach chan eil cuid as motha nan ainmean seo ri chluinntinn ann an cainnt Gàidheal sa bith. Mar sin, chan e "ainmean" ceart a th' annta, 's e th' annt' ach rudan inntinneach a lìonas leabhar etymology. Tha cuid dhiubh fhathast ri chluinntinn, ged-tà, Obar Bhrothaig no Càrn Mhìlidh 's a leithid, ach nach eil "Muileann Bhaile Ìosaig" rud beag gòrach??
Glassman (2025-11-20 23:24:07+00:00): Can you explain why you removed the place tag? It is critical for searching in OSM.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174828076
Glassman (2025-11-20 23:27:58+00:00): #TIP: add the address to the house outline. also we don't use descriptive names like name=house. Tags are sufficient
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174828087
arjunaraoc (2025-11-26 14:16:35+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Hello Kedhar Sairam,  Please add tags to the way you have added. Look at similar shapes on OSM to understand what tags to add.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174828113
cubbe8 (2025-11-18 21:06:28+00:00): This does not exist. This crossing was removed for construction
cubbe8 (2025-11-18 21:06:45+00:00): And it’s unknown whether it will come back
atticquilt (2025-11-18 21:57:48+00:00): Noted, thanks.
MaxPower14 (2025-11-19 11:55:50+00:00): Yes
Glassman (2025-11-20 23:29:01+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

We don't add personal information in OSM. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mapping_private_information
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174828279
Glassman (2025-11-20 23:30:27+00:00): reverted
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174828279
Glassman (2025-11-20 23:31:29+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

The house isn't a barrier - reverted
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174828324
Glassman (2025-11-20 23:32:53+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174828331
Glassman (2025-11-20 23:33:30+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174828455
Glassman (2025-11-20 23:35:21+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

Please - no personal information in OSM. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mapping_private_information. This will be reverted
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174828474
Glassman (2025-11-20 23:39:30+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

not sure what the polygon with the tag name=barrier is - so I'm removing it.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174828636
ChrissW-R1 (2025-11-20 00:21:32+00:00): Please check https://osm.org/note/5060505
Dawid2849 (2025-11-18 22:22:57+00:00): Cześć. Na jakiej podstawie dałeś tu secondary?
Dawid2849 (2025-11-18 22:23:31+00:00): Jest to łącznik S52 z DK1 oraz biegną tu dwie trasy europejskie (E)
bartgron (2025-11-18 22:38:28+00:00): Zestaw zmian wycofany:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174836142
Pozdrawiam
user_23310066 (2025-11-20 16:13:17+00:00): @Dawid2849 bo jak jedzisz od poludnie w lewo to po co wjezdzac na trunka na 300m
bartgron (2025-11-20 19:53:55+00:00): Przecież to nie ma najmniejszego znaczenia
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-21 00:28:10+00:00): A po twojej zmianie jadąc z północy i zjeżdżając na S52 nagle masz 300 m drogi niższej klasy co jest błędniejsze

Dodatkowo: gdzie dyskusja na forum przed zmianą? Nigdy nie rób zmian klasy dróg jak trunk bez dyskusji na forum
chinook17 (2026-07-03 19:27:19+00:00): Bonjour,
Cycleway shoulder devrait être réservé pour les rues avec un accotement.
aTarom (2025-11-19 18:26:44+00:00): Hola, bienvenido a OSM, para elementos que no tienen numero de calle tenemos etiqueta específica que debemos usar, es nohousenumber=yes, tienes más info en la wiki
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:nohousenumber
Cualquier duda tenemos grupo de Telegram o foro de la comunidad
https://t.me/OSMes
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/es/51
pantufla (2025-11-20 14:22:48+00:00): Hello, please see: https://mapgen-fi-1.comaps.app/subway/validator/spain.html

This caused an error
Glassman (2025-11-20 23:42:59+00:00): The walkway to the house should be a way not an area. The driveway should be a way and tagged as highway=service + service=driveway
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174829946
Koalibou (2025-11-19 17:49:59+00:00): Doublon, Lavit existe déjà.
mueschel (2025-11-19 19:16:12+00:00): Hi,
you imported a large amount of data here. What is the source of the data? Is it available under a license compatible with OSM? Where can we find the mandatory documentation of the import?

Please read our import guidelines:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
Koalibou (2025-11-19 17:47:52+00:00): Doublon, Mas de Roubert existe déjà...
Koalibou (2025-11-19 17:45:17+00:00): Doublon, ce hameau existe déjà...
user_18023081 (2025-11-18 20:04:56+00:00): *Imagery used was Esri Clarity, not SPW most recent
Koalibou (2025-11-19 17:44:00+00:00): Doublon... Chatusses existe déjà, pourquoi rajouter Quartier de Chatusses juste à côté ?
Cebderby (2025-11-27 17:14:00+00:00): wrong, reset main line of A6 to trunk
Koalibou (2025-11-19 17:41:51+00:00): Idem, encore un doublon...
Koalibou (2025-11-19 17:40:04+00:00): Doublon, le hameau de Poujols existe déjà sur la carte.
Merci d'arrêter de faire des doublons partout...
gpserror (2025-11-19 01:33:50+00:00): This name is more of a descriptive name which shouldn't be used for names.  Rather, the operation should be called a "farm" of sorts and cannabis being their crop.
marcoSt (2025-11-23 11:47:07+00:00): Hallo osm-pt-account,

Leider liegst Du mit deiner Annahme falsch. Die Linie OVG 31 ist ein reines Linientaxi, in dem Du dich eine Stunde vorher für die Fahrt anmelden musst. Gilt für jede Fahrt.

Hier noch ein Begleittext aus dem Fahrplan:
Linientaxi: Anmeldung mind. 60 Minuten vor Abfahrt unter Tel. 08341/438606-0. Fahrten vor 10 Uhr und
Fahrten an Sonn-/Feiertagen, sind am Vortag bis spätestens 16:00 Uhr, am Samstag bis 14:00 Uhr, anzumelden.
Keine Beförderung von Reisegruppen. Anmeldung über App: On-Demand OAL.KF

Den Kannst Du hier herunterladen:
https://www.vg-kirchweihtal.de/fahrplan-netz/linienfahrplaene/
eggie (2025-11-18 20:40:42+00:00): Dag Hans  Wanneer access=no is getagd hoef je geen foot=no bij te taggen.
MVG
eggie
bartgron (2025-11-19 22:39:12+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
marc__marc (2025-12-06 22:40:43+00:00): Bonjour,
l'intégration semble avoir été fait à l'arrache sans réflexion.
par ex à cet endroit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175604031, j'ai annulé la création 5 stations de recharge là où il y a 5 bornes. l'opendata dit qu'il n'y a qu'une station Power Dot, ce n'est même pas certains que les autres bornes concerne PowerDot
Cordialement,
Marc
LySioS (2025-12-06 22:50:44+00:00): Merci de ta vigilance
user_5359 (2025-11-19 14:19:04+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't add any private information.
matthewfecica (2025-11-25 23:20:03+00:00): For the 'Roller Haven', there are trail closed signs at the northern end, and it looks like the park does not want people to use that trail, and is trying to restore that section of forest
gurglypipe (2025-11-18 21:51:38+00:00): Hiya, thanks for the note. Sounds like you know more about the site than my guess from the aerial imagery, so please feel free to amend the tagging to be more appropriate. :) If a suitable tag isn’t already documented on the wiki (see things linked from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dwastewater_plant) then feel free to make up a new one (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Any_tags_you_like).

In any case, it might be worth keeping a link to https://waterprojectsonline.com/case-studies/kendal-wwtw-2019/ in a note on the reactor. :)
bartgron (2025-11-19 22:38:27+00:00): Co zostało naprawione? Samo "naprawa" nic nie wyjaśnia, zwłaszcza że obszar zmian to cały Toruń
Fizzie-DWG (2025-11-20 01:12:26+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18980
Fizzie-DWG (2025-11-20 01:14:15+00:00): DWG revert - vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174886728
joost schouppe (2025-11-20 14:15:47+00:00): Check de definitie van shop=mall op de wiki eens - volgens mij niet van toepassing hier, de winkels lijken me enkel van buiten bereikbaar. Gewoon landuse=commercial lijkt me hier juister.
jkorf (2025-11-21 12:21:04+00:00): shop=mall klopt hier niet inderdaad maar landuse laat ik dan op retail staan, bedankt voor de feedback.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-11-18 21:32:24+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13314947561

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2025-11-18 22:12:40+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13314947561

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
kamilbogacki (2025-11-19 18:38:43+00:00): Tam nie ma nazwy ulicy.
silversurfer83 (2025-11-19 17:04:48+00:00): Hi there :)

could you please check the changes you made to this building and tell me if they were intentional or not?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/215049126

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174833334
cvseibert (2025-11-19 17:25:42+00:00): No, it was not intentional. I did not know that it was part of my graaveyard change. I did not change the outline, that I was aware of.
silversurfer83 (2025-11-19 17:32:54+00:00): Thanks for the quick reply.

It sometimes happens when one clicks "edit" before the intended area has been selected. The history and this changeset here clearly show you changed the buildings properties.

Will you fix it?
cvseibert (2025-11-19 18:53:50+00:00): It appears to have already been fixed. I apolige for my newbie error.
silversurfer83 (2025-11-19 19:40:02+00:00): That's alright. It happens. Even to seasoned contributors.

So don't worry, keep an eye on your changes and happy mapping :)
cvseibert (2025-11-19 20:12:17+00:00): Well, there are 860 grave sites showing in Find A Grave and I am an editor at Miles Files https://espl-genealogy.org/index.php 
My project there is to get Miles Files, Find A Grave, & OpenStreetMap to all agree with the 2 graveyard books for Accomack County, VA - Name, Town & L/L. So i'll be at this for a while.
2 suggestions for management - use winter satellite views for editing in the northern hemisphere (trees obscure gravestones & small features), also use a bright color for the 'Edit' Cursor (+).

Later,
CartoCharles (2025-11-19 11:35:12+00:00): Merci  pour les corrections. Si tu veux annuler les contribution du contributeur problématique, avec JOSM tu as un plugin reverter qui fera le travail aussi :)
Glassman (2025-11-20 23:49:07+00:00): We don't use descriptive names in OSM. The tags are sufficient
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174833474
Glassman (2025-11-18 21:51:12+00:00): #TIP: we don't use descriptive names, just tag it properly as you did with building=house
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174833499
Glassman (2025-11-18 21:48:06+00:00): #TIP: street names are spelled out in OSM because software can have a difficult time with abbreviation.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174833644
Glassman (2025-11-20 23:48:01+00:00): We don't use descriptive names, the tags are sufficient.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174833710
Glassman (2025-11-18 21:49:33+00:00): This looks like a duplicate park and someone has removed your version already.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174833838
Glassman (2025-11-20 23:57:45+00:00): The outline should match the roof - can you fix this?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174833848
Glassman (2025-11-18 21:46:12+00:00): #TIP: You shouldn't add any personal infomation when editing, though this isn't bad
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174833931
OrchidA (2025-11-18 21:25:32+00:00): Correction: Source used was Vantor satellite imagery via Vantor Hub 2025-10-20
Glassman (2025-11-20 23:45:24+00:00): opening hours tag should be with times like 07:00-18:00. Then add an access=private so show it's for residents only
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174834008
user_5359 (2025-11-19 14:00:40+00:00): Welcome to OSM!

Short hint for the value of the key service_times. Is the service held every day or only on Sundays? In the latter case, you forgot the day abbreviation Su.
By the way, we write the time in 24-hour notation and do not abbreviate minutes.
user_5359 (2025-11-19 14:11:27+00:00): I merge the booth overlapping buildings. Please see https://www.osm.org/way/1412965268!
balint36 (2026-03-19 16:16:25+00:00): "fasorok, fakitermelések" összefoglalóval miért alakítottad át Gyöngyös vonat megállásának pontját vasútállomássá?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10292348167/
Már létezik egy ilyen:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/243750429
balint36 (2026-03-19 16:24:33+00:00): A helytelen módosítást a pontnál visszaállítottam.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180119334
szigyi222 (2026-03-23 10:39:10+00:00): Köszönöm a visszajelzést, és a hiba javítását.
Figyelmetlenségből, sajnos.
Baloo Uriza (2025-11-19 15:11:51+00:00): building=detached is ideal for individual houses.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174834330
VictorIE (2025-11-23 08:01:38+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1451806539/

As the A5 is marked highway=construction, this means that this section of road is not available to use. Is this correct?
boocha34 (2025-11-25 09:47:38+00:00): The section of the road is currently (and has been for months now) undergoing total reconstruction and upgrade. it is still navigable with stop-and-go and temporary detours.
RushMM (2025-11-18 23:33:38+00:00): Hi, just in case you missed it, looks like you may have accidentally deleted some info from the buildings, the previous ones had building=apartments and 
building:levels=4 tagged on it. Thanks
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174834728
RushMM (2025-11-19 19:29:07+00:00): Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174875170
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174834728
Bartek444 (2026-04-18 09:33:16+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5254966
Comino (2025-11-18 22:32:47+00:00): Hi,

Weserstraße 12, 10247 Berlin is a residential address and is not allowed on OpenStreetMap (OSM). Only a physical store or office that is clearly identifiable as such are allowed.

I kindly ask you to delete your entry.
paolo@DIRTYJOBS (2025-11-18 22:41:53+00:00): Hi,
at the private flat I own at the address of Weserstr. 12, 10247, the company (einzelunternehmen) I manage - under the name of DirtyJobs_engineering_solutions - is regularly registered (gewerbe angemeldet).

Everything is legally "in ordnung" therefore I kindly ask you to approve the changes (name).

Many thanks in advance,

Paolo
Comino (2025-11-18 22:55:18+00:00): Hi there,

I’m sure everything is perfectly legal; I have no doubt about that.  
We simply have to follow the OpenStreetMap (OSM) rules. These rules dictate how certain things must be tagged. For example, names written entirely in capitals, special characters, or emojis aren’t allowed, and we always omit the legal entity suffix, so no GmbH even if that’s in the company’s official name.

Apart from that, a business is only allowed on the OSM map if it has a physical store or office that is clearly recognizable as such. The same rule applies to online shops, they’re not permitted either.

Best regards,  
Edwin
granitschädel (2026-03-15 10:31:56+00:00): Hallo is-zUser
Bitte beim nächsten Mal darauf achten, keinen veralteten Stand einzutragen. Im östlichen Bereich am Friedhof hast du die die neue Wendeschleife mitsamt Straße wieder entfernt.
is-zUser (2026-03-17 16:41:58+00:00): Sorry, an der Stelle hatte ich mich auf das (veraltete!) Luftbild verlassen. Danke für die Korrektur.