piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse (2026-03-28 19:46:14+00:00): I think you've mangled the operator on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/394544828/history - it doesn't seem valid UTF-8
confusedbuffalo (2026-03-29 14:21:27+00:00): Thank you for noticing this and pointing it out, I had seen this error in a couple of other places and thought I had fixed all occurrences, apparently I missed this one.

Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180586286
user_5359 (2025-09-19 10:42:16+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/relation/19507527. The relation miss the tag type=boundary and the member miss the role outer or admin_centre!
I assume this is a generel error.
AndyB_66 (2025-09-18 19:33:31+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
AndyB_66 (2025-09-18 19:32:32+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
jcnl44 (2025-09-19 12:44:05+00:00): Bonjour,
Je pense qu'il y a une erreur sur l'école Saint-Joseph de Fresnay-en-Retz. Celle-ci est une école privée, et le ref:UAI ajouté correspond à l'école publique Victor Schoelcher située dans la même commune.
Lisapple (2025-09-24 16:25:30+00:00): Bonjour,
Oui, effectivement, j'ai inversé les identifiants. Je viens donc de rajouter celui de l'école Saint-Joseph (et corrigé l'email).
Merci de me m'avoir prévenu.
Cordialement.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-10-06 06:21:39+00:00): Those roads were for the floor level
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-10-06 06:23:29+00:00): Reverted
people128256 (2025-10-06 15:27:16+00:00): Why would you revert it within a span of 2min? What time was it in PDT? 23:20. You need to give me time to respond without reverting. Anyway, the reason I did this was because of a note from @chath_tsu that said the lots layout needed an update. It's possible I made a mistake.

Though in summary, please give me time to respond next time. You're lucky you didn't revert a change with major edits. Please give me at least a day to respond and please don't attempt to contact me when I'm sleeping, even worse revert within two minutes without discussing.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-10-06 20:53:04+00:00): Reverts of bad changesets don't require me waiting for a response.
Please don't 'map' the roof since you won't have an accurate connection to the road network and would require mapping of all levels which only creates a mess for multi story parking garages. 
Generally these are only mapped to the entrances to the structure unless there's a floor that serves a function other than parking such as the floor level which is for rideshare and taxi pickups.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-10-06 20:56:40+00:00): I'm not 'lucky'. 
I knew what I was reverting.
people128256 (2025-10-06 21:59:35+00:00): "Reverts of bad changesets don't require me waiting for a response."
That's open to interpretation, but fine. Other people are able to discuss minor things such as dual carriageways of a single carriageway but that can't be done here.
"Please don't 'map' the roof since you won't have an accurate connection to the road network and would require mapping of all levels which only creates a mess for multi story parking garages."
That's fine, please just tell me why you're reverting next time if you revert without discussing as a courtesy :)
Traffikant (2025-11-01 11:12:59+00:00): Hallo streckenkundler, 
ich versuche gerade die doppelten Radwege am Hüttenweg zu korrigieren , die ehemalige Grenze (w25156778), die jetzt zum Radweg mutiert ist, kann ich mit korrekten Radweg-Tags versehen und vorne und hinten an die Straßen anschließen, oder ist da noch was anderes faul? 
Die Grenzen musstest du ja offenbar hier neu erstellen.
Danke !
streckenkundler (2025-11-01 16:48:49+00:00): Hei,

ich hatte mich nur um die Grenzen gekümmert, da ich eigentlich meine Finger aus Berlin raushalten möchte. Ich hatte das CS mir lokal revertet. Dann hatte aus dem verursachenden CS nur die Grenzsegmente herausgelesen und die Grenzen repariert...

Bei dem, was er woanders noch fabriziert hat, wundert mich da gar nichts mehr...

Sven
Panconpalta2530 (2025-09-20 06:57:55+00:00): Oye amigo, la aurora de la ciudad de Manta no es un barrio, este lugar es una ciudadela/urbanización gracias
bartgron (2025-09-18 20:24:53+00:00): Zestaw zmian wycofany:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172131839
Pozdrawiam
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-12 07:38:32+00:00): Cleaned up remaining SEO spam and other tagging for Dogtopia POI in changeset 184003200

https://osm.org/changeset/184003200
NeisBot (2025-09-18 20:27:40+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-09-26 14:06:29+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/172487800
fortera_au (2025-11-10 03:21:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 174443403 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: incompatible source
NeisBot (2025-09-18 20:26:34+00:00): Hi Rudas, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 86% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 7 highway(s)
- 1 building(s)
- 1 landuse(')

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=172131816
mcliquid (2025-09-19 16:25:19+00:00): Feedback:
- landuse's die direkt nebeneinander liegen, kann man gerne miteinander verbinden. Bitte nicht mit Straßen oder anderen Objekten. Aber zwei Äcker nebeneinander können verbunden werden.
- Wenn du den Ort deiner Bearbeitung wechselst, lade deine Änderungen dazwischen immer hoch. In dem Fall beim Ortswechsel von Moos nach Hilpertenhof.
foreigner037 (2025-09-28 11:18:15+00:00): Hi,

please avoid separating the lanes if they are not physically separated.
SunnyIsland10 (2025-09-29 21:06:23+00:00): Hello foreigner037,

This editor is no longer on the team but thank you for changing this back. I agree with your modeling here.

Have a good day!
Sylabowy Kot (2025-09-18 22:00:59+00:00): +budowa domu dla osób w kryzysie bezdomności, nowe budynki na terenie wojskowym (ciekawe, że wszystkie są w EGiB). 

Swoją drogą, to internet nie wskazuje żadnych informacji o numerze JW 3835. Na pewno stacjonuje tutaj JW 3964 i to się da łatwo wyszukać.
janhals (2025-09-18 21:00:35+00:00): Aanvulling laatste zin: (Overigens is de oprit naar 37 via het naastgelegen Zandpad+.
custodiankeyy (2025-09-19 20:16:35+00:00): İlişki olarak mahalleye eklemenize gerek yok. Bölgeyi belirtmek için adres kısmını kullanabilirsiniz.
Đuro Jiří (2025-10-01 06:16:41+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/13154155813
name=La Casa de las Carcasas
brand=La Casa de las Carcasas
brand:wikidata=Q127275290
shop=mobile_phone_accessories
Đuro Jiří (2025-10-01 06:17:44+00:00): * https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13154155813
Minh Nguyen (2025-10-01 06:40:45+00:00): ¡Gracias! https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172690338
FixH (2025-09-18 21:36:27+00:00): https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lochbach_(Tauber)#/media/Datei:Markelsheim_Lochbach_Verdolung_01.jpg
rskedgell (2025-09-18 22:44:52+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for spotting and correcting this.

According to OS Open USRN, there may be another arm of Wesley Drive going SW between the vicarage and White's Road. That doesn't necessarily mean it's been built or will ever get build, but are you local enough to check?
RanmaJen (2025-09-18 23:37:57+00:00): Yes, there is another arm, but I am not sure if that is named as Wesley Drive or any other name. Because that area is a new build area. Information is not sufficient. I may go there to check but may be a few weeks later.
Sylabowy Kot (2025-09-18 21:41:01+00:00): +survey; https://tramwar.pl/twpodstacje.html
NeisBot (2025-09-18 21:44:35+00:00): Hi isXander, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 98% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 1 highway(s)
- 1 building(s)
- 2 natural(s)
- 1 landuse(')

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=172134207
isXander (2025-09-18 21:48:38+00:00): Yes, these are intentional.
woodpeck (2025-09-18 22:06:13+00:00): Video available on https://www.deyeshigh.co.uk/#single/0 seems to corroborate new building layout (at about 0:28) though demolition status of old buildings unclear.
isXander (2025-09-18 22:11:09+00:00): Plans are here. https://pa.sefton.gov.uk/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=documents&keyVal=R823NENWH2L00
isXander (2025-09-18 22:12:08+00:00): Demolition plans: https://www.deyeshigh.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/proposed_demolition.pdf
i2004 (2025-09-18 22:06:48+00:00): eso me quedo poco claro porque ahora buena parte de los coches tienen la numeracion de la 115
AgusQui (2025-09-18 22:54:23+00:00): Porque están en proceso de ramalizacion
i2004 (2025-09-18 23:43:01+00:00): https://www.instagram.com/p/DOuMDiiFewM/
i2004 (2025-09-18 23:43:27+00:00): https://www.instagram.com/p/DOuL1E6lcAX/
JesseFTW (2025-09-18 22:18:55+00:00): I know some of these traffic signs need better tag values; I'll work on that now; I just wanted to get the locations out of EveryDoor.
Hufkratzer (2025-09-19 20:13:51+00:00): Hi,
this area looks like a riding arena (carriere) and not like an equestrian centre; it should be tagged like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/997013111 (leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian), see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:leisure=horse_riding
Turb (2025-09-19 22:02:20+00:00): Done
DressyPear4 (2025-09-20 04:36:05+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Good_changeset_comments
Tris_1220 (2025-09-19 07:34:05+00:00): Wege mit bicycle und foot "designated" dürfen "cycleway" sein und nur einzelne Wege in Wien zu "path" zu ändern erstellt dann einen Flächenteppich. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dcycleway#Österreich
jhaluska80 (2025-09-19 17:27:39+00:00): I could not find a sign on streetside to back up the change and the parcel maps show that the suffix is Street not Way.

I'm sorry that people are getting confused between the addresses, but please don't change the name of the road as it causes people who live there problems.

I have reverted the changeset.
jhaluska80 (2025-09-19 17:38:19+00:00): On the intersection of East Hutchinson Avenue, Streetside does confirm it should be Street.
osmviborg (2025-09-19 06:58:05+00:00): Lad os starte et andet sted. Du tegner svingbaner på steder hvor vejen ikke er separeret, altså der er ikke en fysisk adskillelse af de enkelte baner, det er en generel fejl. Hele krydset er fejltegnet. Det oprindelige var korrekt tegnet. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Editing_Standards_and_Conventions#Divided_highways
osmviborg (2025-09-19 07:09:49+00:00): På steder hvor vejbanerne ikke er fysisk adskilt skal du bruge turn:lanes=* https://lgms.nl/p/osm/cached-wiki/?page=Key:turn#Indicated_turns_by_lane
Geoskye (2025-09-19 23:44:22+00:00): You may be looking for this
https://businessconnect.apple.com/
JesseFTW (2026-05-31 16:47:46+00:00): You incorrectly moved two power towers in this changeset while you were fixing the motorway_link tags. I've moved them back in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183457292 . Please try and avoid doing that in the future. Thanks for all your work around the Northeast, though!
Glassman (2025-09-19 02:53:09+00:00): thanks for disconnecting the flock device from the road. Can you fix your other edits? One suggestion, looks for pole shadows to determine where the device might be mounted and place the node where the shadow shows the pole in the ground.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172137083
Hb- (2025-12-30 21:26:08+00:00): Bitte die vier Seulingswald-MPs um Friedewald in ein einziges MP zusammenfassen.
Bauer33333 (2026-06-11 10:37:37+00:00): Hi, may I ask why you removed the stream tag from several streams here and tagged them as ridges instead? Thanks
BholeKiBhasam (2026-06-14 14:49:54+00:00): let me see,
BholeKiBhasam (2026-06-14 14:52:46+00:00): please can you pin point the area or ridgelines...it'd be of great help...
BholeKiBhasam (2026-06-14 14:55:07+00:00): i think i found them...now i recall what actually happened here, the imagery confusion....i thought i had reverted them back, but probably missed afew...correcting them and if you still find some like these, then do let me know...have a great day
BholeKiBhasam (2026-06-14 15:01:29+00:00): thanks, that was not intentional
Bauer33333 (2026-06-18 21:25:30+00:00): Thank you for the quick fix :)
Looking good, I don't see any left. If I see some I will fix them, just didn't want to undo your work without getting into touch first
BholeKiBhasam (2026-06-19 10:34:38+00:00): thank you so much, getting in touch is far much better than those VIP mappers who had earlier removed some of my edits (via software) not because they were incorrect or mistake but they were at micro level...any how it was nice to have your feedback, have a great weekend
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-09-20 11:44:48+00:00): Please do not remove lane transitions. There were carefuly added and were accurate.
sarya_Lyft (2025-09-23 01:22:18+00:00): Hi ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy,

My name is Surander and I’m a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft.
Thank you for your insight! I apologize for overlooking the value transition. We will revise our policy in light of your OSM comments. Thank you for promptly correcting this error.
I updated the lanes tag based on Lyft-owned background (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1pUWfmPGHeb1MaryyI1opJPAESHzBIe_i/view?usp=sharing) and Lyft-owned street-level imagery (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1P3cVNZqhjjV0gI9ntVjuIPI2WK_aTZL1/view?usp=sharing) dated August 2025. The space available for vehicle entry before this node was quite narrow, which is why I made the change.
I hope this explains the rationale behind my edits. The screenshots will be available for a month. Please let me know if you are unable to view them within this timeframe – I could generate them once again. Happy mapping!


Best regards, Surander
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-09-23 10:34:54+00:00): Thanks! It is ok for the turn lanes, but please do not remove transitions:

See the wiki on lanes: osm.wiki/Lanes at section "Motorway with lanes and destinations" and osm.wiki/Proposal:Placement section "Current status: lane count decreases"

Thanks!
Herwescheluc (2025-09-19 09:12:17+00:00): Hallo, akino_germany,

maxweightrating war mir bisher unbekannt, nachdem ich mich eingelesen habe, sehe ich: In D gibt's wohl kein maxweightrating 40, nur 3,5 (VZ 1053-55), 7,5 (VZ 1053-33) oder 12 (VZ1053-37), so sagt mir zumindest die StVO.

Hängt da wirklich UNTER dem Schild ein Zusatzschild, oder ist es doch ein einzelnes  VZ 262 mit 40? Dann wäre es laut Wiki-Eintrag (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:maxweightrating#Unterschiede_zu_maxweight=*) nur einfach maxweight.

Wie ist es tatsächlich vor Ort beschildert?

Grüße aus Herborn

Andreas
akino_germany (2025-09-19 10:27:18+00:00): Das Bild habe ich vor Ort gemacht. https://imgur.com/a/kVwCQCa#lgWPhwz
Herwescheluc (2025-09-19 17:11:46+00:00): Danke für die Aufklärung! 👍
literan (2025-09-20 10:27:07+00:00): и зачем вы нарисовали еще одно здание поверх  другого? откат
kosmgeolan (2025-09-22 01:01:46+00:00): Доброе утро! 
Мне нужно было посоветоваться с коллегами для принятия правильного решения.
Я хотела самостоятельно закончить работу над этим пунктом, но Вы меня опередили.
Спасибо конечно, что сделали за меня (это было лишнее).
Я как раз вернулась к спорным моментам своей работы))
Еще раз благодарю
Supaplex030 (2025-09-19 10:20:06+00:00): Hallo Tobias,

du hast hier den dokumentierten Tag "de:strassenschluessel" zu "ref:DE-BE:STR" geändert, den es so bisher noch nicht zu geben scheint. Bist du dir bewusst, dass die Straßenschlüsselangabe in der vorherigen Form bereits über 80.000 mal in Deutschland verwendet wird und Datennutzende, falls es solche gibt, die Werte nach deiner Änderung nicht mehr interpretieren können?

Siehe auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:de:strassenschluessel.

Unabgestimmt finde ich diese Änderung jedenfalls ungünstig.

Lg, Alex
eggie (2025-09-19 06:27:56+00:00): Hi..

Hint... use the present addressnodes to tag on.
Greetz,
eggie
kingkingHK (2025-10-14 12:30:02+00:00): Hi there, what is https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4847959953 and why is it in the middle of the road? Or is it simply an editing mistake?
Kovoschiz (2025-10-15 08:59:23+00:00): You should not ask the last user. It's not the one responsible.
Koreller (2025-11-19 14:28:08+00:00): Hi, I've just see you edits.

Where did you find the english name for "곰도" ("곰섬") https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/16380436 ?

The US NGA (National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency) absolutely don't use this one : https://www.geonames.org/1867345/kom-do.html (nor the old map from the US Army Map Service : https://maps.lib.utexas.edu/maps/ams/korea_50k/txu-pclmaps-oclc-6612107-sonam-dong-6132-4.jpg, which use "Ung-do").

Did you speak korean ? Did you master romanization ? (McCune-Reischauer Romanization, Revised Romanization of Korean, Yale Romanization, or better Romanization of Korean ?)

Thanks in advance for you answers
BigKev97 (2025-12-06 13:05:15+00:00): With pleasure.
NeisBot (2025-09-19 03:15:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
Two Rivers Ohakune (2025-09-19 04:05:50+00:00): A boutique B&B on the edge of Ohakune Town Centre.
NeisReview (2025-09-26 14:05:58+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/172142698
FajrAl (2026-06-14 12:32:39+00:00): Melihat tag source=FMI/IDS Fiber Optic Sitac, boleh ditempelkan tautan atau referensi sumber datanya di sini?
NeisBot (2025-09-19 04:47:35+00:00): Hi Noah Gekiere, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 96% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 21 natural(s)
- 6 landuse(')

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=172141277
Noah Gekiere (2025-09-20 01:17:45+00:00): Yes, the deletions were intentional. Those holes on the golf course no no longer exist.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-09-20 12:21:16+00:00): Please keep the lanes count accurate with transitions. The width:lanes:start/end tags are there to specify where the lanes start/end.
sbedwal_Lyft (2025-09-23 05:53:32+00:00): My name is Santosh, and I’m a mapper in the OSM team at Lyft. 
Thank you for your message, and for catching this error! The lanes tags shouldn’t be modified here. I apologized for this mistake. I have reverted my edits in the changeset:https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172305783
I will exercise greater diligence when submitting changesets.

Best regards,
Santosh
NeisBot (2025-09-19 05:26:59+00:00): Hi Lio11400, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Updated road with private access"
NeisBot (2025-09-19 05:47:09+00:00): Hi check_967722, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Removed field boundary and adjusted geometry"
aceman444 (2026-04-12 10:24:13+00:00): This change is absolutely wrong and will be reverted. Don't ever damage roads in this way. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lanes#Examples and further examples.
aceman444 (2026-04-12 10:45:10+00:00): Wrong change again, unneded branching of roads and even invalid values of turn:lanes at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1431091476 so navigation will be wrong after this change, not before it.
aceman444 (2026-04-12 10:49:13+00:00): The triple branching at wrong location was actually caused by wrong change at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172143108 .

All of this will be reverted.
Dimitar155 (2025-09-19 06:46:02+00:00): Кръглата сграда (way/1431094505) има около 190 възела в повече.
plamen (2025-09-19 07:03:51+00:00): 28 са сега
Dimitar155 (2025-09-19 07:45:30+00:00): Благодаря
NeisBot (2025-09-19 06:30:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description
NeisReview (2025-09-26 14:05:04+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/172153424
eggie (2025-09-19 08:22:10+00:00): De wijzigingen van nieuwe mapper teruggedraaid.
Zal waarschijnlijk ook de note plaatser zijn geweest.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172147348

Groet,
eggie
eggie (2025-09-19 07:41:53+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-09-19 07:43:12+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Glassman (2025-09-20 02:13:44+00:00): It always a good idea to add the tag, layer=1 when adding a roof.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172144320
redd (2025-11-12 12:14:24+00:00): Hello jaakkoh,
seems like there happened an error with highway=living_street;living street

on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1305648485

please check again!

Thanks,

redd
Merna_mahmoud (2025-09-21 13:55:51+00:00): Hello Sandalss,
Thank you for your contribution to OpenStreetMap in Oman.
I noticed you converted these streets from construction to operation:
"way 1059489017, way 621307533, way 245251156, way 245251160, way 1059489016, way 1059489018, way 1419276637, way 1419276636," knowing that the latest satellite image I have is (Maxar satellite imagery via MGP Pro 2025-09-08). The roads appear to be under construction. Do you have any sources confirming that the streets are operational? If you do, please share those sources with me. If not, please address this issue.
Regards,
Merna_mahmoud
allmyhomieshategoogle (2025-09-19 06:55:49+00:00): It worked - I was initially using demolished:building, adding =service made the tag stick