piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mueschel (2024-03-23 09:44:53+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM!
I see that you added many tags like these:

edificio progettato = si
elementi identitari = /
servizi presenti = Bar
stato edificio = Buono
tipo di copertura = Piano
valore storico = no

In OSM we have to use a well-defined set of tags to allow all the software tools to understand the data and e.g. show it on maps.
Please make sure that you only use tags that are documented in the Wiki or are available as presets in your editor.

If you have questions, please feel free to ask in the forums!

PS: It looks like you're working in a group with other mappers. Please point your supervisor / group leader to our organized editing guidelines:
https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines
MxxCon (2024-03-26 00:24:38+00:00): Hello.
The way you tagged wikidata and wikipedia on these trees is incorrect.
Such information should be tagged using species: and genus: namespaces as documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:species:wikidata and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:genus:wikidata
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148936485
mike140 (2024-03-21 22:14:53+00:00): Щось тут не так: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5385790
kapazao (2024-04-05 06:37:05+00:00): Hi, is there any reason to remove correct and important data from this fuel station?
o_andras (2024-04-05 08:32:06+00:00): Hi, what specifically are you refering to?
kapazao (2024-04-05 18:55:43+00:00): The fuel node: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/311578901/history
o_andras (2024-04-06 15:20:37+00:00): I'm not on a computer to check that right now, but if I deleted something that I shouldn't have it was by mistake, not intentional.
mueschel (2024-03-23 09:44:42+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM!
I see that you added many tags like these:

edificio progettato = si
elementi identitari = /
servizi presenti = Bar
stato edificio = Buono
tipo di copertura = Piano
valore storico = no

In OSM we have to use a well-defined set of tags to allow all the software tools to understand the data and e.g. show it on maps.
Please make sure that you only use tags that are documented in the Wiki or are available as presets in your editor.

If you have questions, please feel free to ask in the forums!

PS: It looks like you're working in a group with other mappers. Please point your supervisor / group leader to our organized editing guidelines:
https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines
ivanbranco (2024-03-23 13:39:08+00:00): Ciao ilariac16, questo changeset é stato annullato per ripristinare la situazione precedente. La motivazione é che le linee guida per gli import ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines ) e quelle per le modifiche di gruppo ( https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines ) non sono state rispettate. Per favore seguite le linee guida prima di procedere con ulteriori modifiche.
tekim (2024-03-25 22:40:59+00:00): I also welcome you to OpenStreetMap!  In addition to the excellent comments from @ivanbranco and @mueschel, I would add that we are not allowed to use Google Earth when editing OpenStreetMap.
yopaseopor (2024-03-21 08:33:09+00:00): Stop deleting tags, you are affecting an importation of Spanish Cadastre. Please don't vandalize the map. You're a https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148937217
Frans S (2024-03-21 09:29:28+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 

Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Don't use 'highway=unclassified for all tracks.
Decide based on the widht of a trace how to tag it.
Narrow< 2 meter wide = Path

Wider =   Unclassified
Follow the traces more accurate please.


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148937263
yopaseopor (2024-03-21 08:40:34+00:00): You have changed other Catalan tags in other changesets. Review it. Stop vandalizing the map. You're a https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry
mcliquid (2024-03-21 06:29:35+00:00): You are no doubt already aware of the advantages of smaller changesets. Was it not possible for you to upload the changes in smaller packages or did you simply not want to? Thanks for your answer.
VARVAR8 (2024-03-25 16:45:47+00:00): Hi mcliquid.
Here is my answer to your question:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149024785
Thanks for the reminder. Happy mapping!
VARVAR8 (2024-03-29 14:18:36+00:00): In the changeset, I adjusted road intersections with buildings and rivers/streams, added bridges, culverts, roads in western Ukraine (added some street names from my own observations), and also in southern Spain (purely intersections). I made a fix with objects that I edited earlier and for which the validator (OSMOSE) gave errors according to my authorship.
Best regards.
Glassman (2024-03-22 16:32:12+00:00): #TIP: spell out street names - the reason is that software has a hard time unabbreviating. 

Also - I suspect the roads should be tagged ownership=private not access=private. Can you review this edit?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148937646
literan (2024-03-21 17:03:02+00:00): это же не Осташковское шоссе; оно севернее
Kevin Wallace (2024-03-21 00:27:55+00:00): The crows in the park got very agitated with me when I got near the water - I think they may be nesting nearby.
CurlingMan13 (2024-03-21 02:33:33+00:00): Please do not delete features just to remap them, especially when they were mapped better before you tried to redraw them.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148938913
mcliquid (2024-03-21 06:29:52+00:00): You are no doubt already aware of the advantages of smaller changesets. Was it not possible for you to upload the changes in smaller packages or did you simply not want to? Thanks for your answer.
VARVAR8 (2024-03-25 16:45:22+00:00): Hi mcliquid.
Here is my answer to your question:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149024785
Thanks for the reminder. Happy mapping!
CurlingMan13 (2024-03-21 02:15:01+00:00): You can use multiple segments of lines to create a network of cartpaths, rather than one long snake folidng back upon itself.  You can also add tunnels for the segments that are tunnels beneath the road.  I have corrected this for you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148938994
Joseph R P (2024-03-25 00:39:52+00:00): Fernley is better classified as a city in my opinion. It's one of the principal cities of the Reno-Sparks-Fernley CSA (which should be taken with a grain of salt as it's loosely defined), and is significantly larger than nearby places classified as towns such as Dayton and Fallon. I also think putting it up against Reno and Carson City is unfair considering they render at a different level which indicates their population/status as a capital over the less significant cities which render at zoom level 7 such as Winnemucca, Elko, and Ely.

I also want to talk about a couple other places, like Sun Valley and Spanish Springs. By US standards, they would informally be "suburbs", but the tag place=suburb uses a Euro-centric name is explained best by the OSM wiki as a "a major area in a place=town or place=city with a distinct and recognized local name and identity". Places perfectly fitting this definition are the five boroughs of New York City or more loosely-defined named areas like Stead in Reno or Centennial Hills in Las Vegas. Sun Valley and Spanish Springs are census-designated places fully-located outside of any incorporated community.

A lot of the villages you downgraded to hamlets are better tagged as villages to better reflect their populations. Places with such a population as Wadsworth (which is 991) are often tagged as villages and sometimes even towns in the US. Place=hamlet like basically all place=* tags is very Euro-centric and will inevitably need to be used differently to varying degrees depending on the country. It's better to make judgement on how a place should be classified based on its local surroundings rather than to refer to the OSM Wiki which typically uses descriptions that are universally broad or specific to Europe unless stated that it applies to the US or a specific US state.
Joseph R P (2024-03-25 18:05:02+00:00): I have in the past considered the unincorporated territory located outside official municipal boundaries that is addressed to or is located within the same ZIP code when reclassifying places. I think this can be criterial but not definitive to whether a place is or is not a village, town, city, etc.

Generally, when mapping populated places, I'd rather apply a place node to a community that has borders which are federally-recognized in some way rather than take the word from people in the area, because the way someone might describe where they're from or the experience of how they know a place as varies by person. I've heard people say they're from "DC" but that ends up being Arlington, Virginia. One might also say they're from Reno or Las Vegas but it's actually Sparks or Henderson.  I live in a CDP myself, and how I say where I am from varies between the specific CDP I am in, the place my home is addressed to, or the primary city of the metro area it is located in. If you simply follow the designation of a place intended to be equivalent to a place with a name, borders, and a population but no local government, then you avoid any COI. While I do think some semblance of local knowledge is important on OSM, I do think relying on a greater source similar to how Wikipedia does is too, at least for things like these.

As for place=suburb tagging, indicative by its European name and most common usage, it is intended be used for what would be simply a large neighborhood in the US rather than the informal American term "suburb" which means a myriad of things, like a smaller town nearby a larger city, a small residential subdivision, the outskirts of a city, etc. Sun Valley and Spanish Springs are functionally more akin to towns rather than neighborhoods within a city. Sun Valley even has its own municipal address, with Spanish Springs having an acceptable alternative city name. I think that makes them stand out a little more than as suburbs by OSM definitions. 

I also think that it isn't necessary for a community to have a central business district, though that does strengthen their independence from nearby cities. Sun Valley does have Sun Valley Boulevard which acts like a "downtown" even if it doesn't look like one. The corridor houses most of the area's commercial buildings as well as the Sun Valley Community Park and the post office. Spanish Springs also has a main commercial area at the intersection of La Posada and Eagle Canyon at Pyramid Way. These aren't the first places you'll think of when you imagine a proper downtown area, but many, if not most towns and cities that started developing after the mid-20th century when cars hit the mainstream look like this, especially throughout the Sun Belt region. Cape Coral, FL is a good example of this, where its downtown is mostly pad sites and strip malls in a city center-like grid.
btwhite92 (2024-03-27 01:53:01+00:00): I'm in my work week right now and don't have the mental energy to burn on writing a full response to all these points at the moment - I have been thinking about it a lot and can see where you're coming from, but I would like to get some more voices from around the community on this since I think you and I can happily talk in circles around a disagreement like this as has happened in the past. Specifically, where do we draw the line between 'town' and 'suburb', what does it mean for a place to be "distinct" and does that matter for place classification, and to what extent should CDP boundaries have a "say" in how we tag in OSM. I'll probably post to the Slack at some point in the next handful of days and tag you in the discussion.
DENelson83 (2024-03-21 01:41:47+00:00): Source tag is incorrect.  Actual source is Bing and ESRI World aerial imagery.
CurlingMan13 (2024-03-21 02:00:04+00:00): do not map each individual tree as natural=wood.  nodes should be used instead if individual trees are desired to be mapped.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148939970
yelisey90 (2024-03-21 17:21:45+00:00): Hi! There's a fence around the kindergarten. How does the road cross that fence?
MihintalePeak (2024-03-29 06:26:21+00:00): Hello yelisey90, thank you for reaching out. I will make an update so that there is no intersection with the fence. Have a good day!
yelisey90 (2024-03-29 10:22:55+00:00): For the reference: I do not argue that the road doesn't exist, or that is should have been deleted. Just there should be some gate or something added at the intersection of the road and the fence, preferably with appropriate access tags.
MihintalePeak (2024-04-01 05:56:56+00:00): After reviewing this area again, I'm uncertain if the service way exists and how it interacts with the fence. If you have resources that show this it would be great if you could make that edit!
Kovirii (2026-04-09 15:33:49+00:00): good use of prefixes
Cy R (2024-03-23 23:45:44+00:00): Hey there, thanks for all the mapping that you've been doing around here. This parking structure has two levels. I changed it back to a building in changeset 149070979. Let me know if you have any questions!
Lumikeiju (2024-03-23 23:58:25+00:00): Hi! When I made this edit, I was walking by at night along 2nd Ave NE and could only see the surface (rooftop) parking area. From my desktop perspective, I can indeed see the lower (underground) entrances on the west side - so thank you very much for catching and fixing my mistake! Much appreciated!
julcnx (2024-04-22 14:53:50+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM! I've had to revert your changes as they don't align with Thailand's highway guidelines. As a new mapper, it's a great idea to begin with straightforward edits in areas you're familiar with, such as your local neighborhood. Please feel free to reach out if you have any questions. Thank you! - Julien

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150351228
alexey_zakharenkov (2024-03-21 08:04:32+00:00): Здравствуйте!

Правильно писать "Восточная улица",  "Лесная улица". Ознакомьтесь, пожалуйста: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Россия/Соглашение_об_именовании_дорог
Warin61 (2024-03-22 01:39:39+00:00): Hi,
Roundabouts should be tagged "junction=roundabout' then the tag 'oneway=yes' is redundant. This helps routers recognize that there is a roundabout.
Caleb NHVR (2024-03-22 02:07:40+00:00): Thanks Warin, I've amended the tags for these recently added roundabouts
tuxayo (2024-03-21 06:10:10+00:00): errata: hangar
OSM FTW (2024-05-15 14:55:54+00:00): у клуба названия "Клуб посёлка Онежский"? или это просто клуб? пожалуйста, для адресации используйте только теги addr:* https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Адреса. для клубов можно использовать ключ club https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:club
OSM FTW (2024-05-15 14:48:23+00:00): здание действительно в высоту 2 метра?
OSM FTW (2024-05-15 14:47:40+00:00): пожалуйста, пишите полное имя и старайтесь избегать сокращения.
mcliquid (2024-03-21 08:19:57+00:00): Hi,

please note: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
geozeisig (2024-03-21 09:22:52+00:00): Es war so auch nicht in meiner Absicht
geozeisig (2024-03-21 09:23:40+00:00): It was not my intention either. So I have reverted it.
suchetan sonavane (2024-03-22 12:31:04+00:00): alright bro
Xevi (2024-03-21 06:55:23+00:00): Si us plau, no elimineu informacio historica de les dades, la botiga estava marcada com a tancada i amb la data corresponent
pitscheplatsch (2024-03-23 15:11:26+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149055107
LorenzoPesci (2024-03-24 22:08:41+00:00): I nomi dei percorsi per mtb vanno nel campo mtb:name come già fatto notare circa 2 anni fa da Andrea Del Sarto.
Chiedo correttezza a Farisan HiFi
canfe (2024-03-21 16:32:55+00:00): Ma è tutto storto! Davvero fanno edifici nuovi così storti??
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148946364
mascalzone67 (2024-03-21 16:54:58+00:00): Ovviamente no! Non ho trovato nessuna foto che illustrasse il nuovo discount. Inoltre è stata creata una rotonda e quindi l’area sarà stata modificata pesantemente e quindi da sistemare con un’immagine più recente.
canfe (2024-03-22 06:13:43+00:00): Capito.
Ma così nessuno se ne accorge.
Metti un fix me in cui spieghi
e poi non sapendo assolutamente la forma, non metterei il building ma un nodo.
mascalzone67 (2024-03-22 06:55:20+00:00): Se lo sapessi fare… gentilmente potresti sistemarlo tu, così capisco e la prossima volta faccio da solo. Grazie anticipatamente. Ciao. Lorenzo
canfe (2024-03-24 17:50:06+00:00): Fatto. Guarda se si capisce.
mascalzone67 (2024-03-30 07:57:35+00:00): Perfetto, così la prossima volta saprò come fare. La zona dovrebbe essere modificata così:
https://primasettimo.it/attualita/nuovo-supermercato-a-settimo-la-sindaca-fa-chiarezza/

Ciao. Lorenzo
Antonio 1 (2024-03-31 10:56:22+00:00): 公交路线被删了？何时能恢复
Antonio 1 (2024-04-01 11:49:06+00:00): 已重做少部分公交线路，每个简单的数据背后隐藏着贡献者的心血，在删除和修改前请慎重考虑，望珍惜其来之不易。
多谢！
luiswoo (2024-03-21 11:16:39+00:00): Наличие тротуара, под зданием, вообще не смутило, да?
eggie (2024-03-21 08:20:12+00:00): Dag Remco..  Volgens mij zijn het uitneembare paaltjes?
Ik heb een paaltje toegevoegd..  Nu de keus
bollard=removable of bollard=fixed?
MVG
eggie
Remco G (2024-03-21 08:24:31+00:00): Hoi Eggie deze is removable maar tijdens een inzet bleek dat dit niet even snel te verwijderen was.Dus niet wenselijk om via deze route te rijden.
eggie (2024-03-21 08:50:28+00:00): Oke... Het zal in ieder geval niet routeren zo. 
gr eggie
Frans S (2024-03-21 09:24:09+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Buildings need to be mapped as building=yes
Follow the outlines of rooflines. Not all buildings are just rectangular.
Not all buildings are squared.


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148947394
mcliquid (2024-03-21 08:34:01+00:00): What kind of guidepost is there? one for hiking or biking? or a general one for businesses?
eggie (2024-03-21 08:27:25+00:00): Dag LP   
Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

'k Denk niet dat het klopt Zie 
Kadaster.
Je hebt adresnode 13 nu verdubbeld.
en nr 16 verplaats naar pand nr 12
18 en17 heb je verwijderd, maar die adressen bestaan gewoon in de BAG.
Je kunt een terugmelding doen richting BAG via deze website.
Dat kan hier. Voorlopig draai ik je changeset terug. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-03-21 08:30:01+00:00): reverted by changeset #148948477
eggie (2024-03-21 08:30:46+00:00): De op elkaar liggende adresnodes heb ik wat uit elkaar gehaald
LPL99 (2024-03-21 08:50:37+00:00): I know that the square where yoou currently have 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18 is where 13(first floor), 14 and 15(second and third floor are), the other apartments are on the right.
eggie (2024-03-21 08:56:55+00:00): Hi LP  You may shift the addressnodes to the right spot at this building. Not to the building next door. 
But please don't delete addressnodes of duplicate these.
Sometimes it's usefull to place the addessnodes at the entrance for delivery companies. 
To specify the floors is complicated. 
Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2024-03-21 08:57:56+00:00): The wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:floor
eggie (2024-03-21 09:26:40+00:00): https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/?searchQuery=Sonja+Heniepad+17&objectId=0363200000447428&theme=BRT+Achtergrond&geometry.x=123022.119&geometry.y=490836.608&zoomlevel=15
Supaplex (2024-03-21 09:17:33+00:00): I am sorry to hear that you bump into the wrong data. It seems there is a mistake when I add the road, thought the road exist and connect that way
Yujin A (2024-03-21 10:02:50+00:00): Thanks for the reply. It’s quite alright. It looks like there might have been a road at one time. And it was just a minor detour. Appreciate the good work you do!
eggie (2024-03-21 08:34:08+00:00): Alle begin is moeilijk.
De naam van het gebouw kan anders zijn dan de instelling. De instelling kinderdagverblijf taggen we dan op de adresnode. Niet op de gebouwomtrek. 
Ook de aard van de instelling toevoegen. amenity=childcare

Het Bovenijziekenhuis staat al in OSM.  De spelling is met 	Bovenij zikenhuis ook verkeerd.
Ik pas even wat aan.
MVG
eggie
mueschel (2024-03-23 09:40:18+00:00): 
Hi,
could you explain the meaning of the nodes you added here?

They all have several tags that are not used in other places:
fee = false
fee1 = no
fid = 25

The coordinates of nodes should not be tagged - they are already evident from the position of the node.
Andrea Musuruane (2024-03-21 11:12:58+00:00): These buildings were imported from a known good source. What makes you think you can have a better design only using aerial photos? BR, Andrea
Baraka Jungwa (2024-03-21 15:00:36+00:00): Thanks for the message, how can I know that given buildings were imported from good source so that I can not edit them using aerial photos the next time I do it?
Andrea Musuruane (2024-03-21 16:05:06+00:00): All buildings inside this area have been imported: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/44913
BR, Andrea
Baraka Jungwa (2024-03-21 21:20:05+00:00): Ok,noted! My changeset was about squaring those that were not square and seems to be so!
A67-A67 (2024-03-25 19:06:31+00:00): Ik heb de foutieve wijziging aan de SPAR city teruggedraaid.
literan (2024-03-21 16:53:06+00:00): name лишний (он для имен собственных), в адресе ошибка (отсутствуют пробелы). Поправлю.
Quaternion (2024-03-21 09:50:32+00:00): Ein Zufahrtsweg zu einem Wohngebäude sollte, wenn er als highway=service erfasst wurde, mit dem Zusatz (service=driveway) versehen werden.

Siehe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dservice#:~:text=Ein%20Zufahrtsweg%20zu%20einem%20Wohnhaus

Außerdem sollte bei der Erfassung solcher Wege darauf geachtet werden, dass nicht wie hier geschehen, sogenannte Routing-Inseln - also Straßenabschnitte, die nicht mit einem größeren Straßennetz verbunden sind - entstehen. Denn aktuell ist die Einfahrt zu Hausnummer 7 über einen Fußweg mit dem Finkenweg verbunden.