piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
rskedgell (2023-10-25 11:41:14+00:00): You appear to have tagged a section of Hampstead Road as foot=no in response to a StreetComplete task asking "Are pedestrians forbidden to walk on this road here?"

I'm trying to find any evidence in Bing Streetside imagery that there really is a (signed) pedestrian prohibition here. I cannot see any TSRGD diagram 625.1 "pedestrians prohibited" signs on the imagery, so do not believe that a prohibition exists. Is this a new signed restriction created by a traffic order more recent than the Bing streetside imagery?

The wiki states that access tags reflect legal access, not whether it would be pleasant, a good idea, safe, etc.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:foot

As real pedestrian prohibitions on public roads other than those tagged as highway=motorway or motorroad=yes in the UK are quite rare and are always signed, this quest is probably better left disabled.
Filip009 (2023-10-27 16:05:37+00:00): Prečo to pridanie colour=red na mnohé cesty?
MiroJanosik (2023-10-30 10:41:11+00:00): Ahoj, je to iba hodnota naviac z reality. Povrch týchto cestičiek je červený.

Toto tagovanie by malo byť v poriadku, podľa 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:colour - It is also often used to describe the real colour of an object like amenity=bench.
Filip009 (2023-10-30 12:51:44+00:00): Okej, vďaka za vysvetlenie, myslel som si, že červená cyklotrasa bola prenesená na cyklochodník a sa ti to nedarilo prehodiť, tak si len pridal colour tag na cyklochodník :) Ale takto je to v poriadku.
Dan_Fi (2023-09-29 06:41:00+00:00): Guten Morgen Stefano,

ich habe eine Frage zu dem Änderungssatz bzw. zu der Gegend.
Gab es von der B300 kurz vor Oberkreut eine "Ausfahrt" (kleinen Abzweig) auf die nebenliegende Straße? Wurde diese entfernt?

Hintergrund:
Unser Router will die B300 dort verlassen und ich frage mich ob dieser Abzweig erst vor kurzem gelöscht wurde.

Die Eintragung deinerseits zweifle ich in keiner Weise an. Das Wissen würde mir für die Nachstellung enorm helfen.

Danke!

Gruß
Daniel
secondaryhighway (2023-09-14 01:42:55+00:00): Hi, you seem to have made an edit ranging from China to Mexico, please try to use different changesets for far away edits.
MikruJon (2023-09-14 12:23:27+00:00): Hi, thank you for the advice, I noticed the big size right after uploading the changeset as well and remembered that I made some edits in China in an earlier editing session right before USA, I will keep a better eye on it in the future :)
user_5359 (2023-09-14 05:33:52+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/5324621995. What is the right name of the location 
name=VCC–Clark
namr=Keith Drive Entrance
Is my correction of the typo correct?
DD1GJ (2023-09-14 06:43:29+00:00): Hallo welzheimerwald,

beachte bitte, dass das als Quelle angegebene Geoportal in der Karten unten rechts ein Copyright des LGL für die Geobasisdaten angibt. Dazu gehören insbesondere Luftbild, DTK und das in höheren Zoomstufen anstatt der Stadtkarte gezeigte ALKIS. 

Woher stammen die Informationen  zu den hier eingetragenen Hausnummern? In dem von Dir als Quelle angegebenen RMK-Geoportal konnte ich diese in keiner der auswählbaren Hintergrundkarten und Datenebenen finden.

Wenn Du vor Deinem nächsten Edit meine Frage nicht plausibel beantwortest, werde ich diesen Änderungssatz zurücksetzen und eine Sperre Deines Accounts beantragen.
welzheimerwald (2023-09-15 14:44:54+00:00): Huhu, gibt oben links eine Adresssuche. Dort kann man zuerst die Gemeinde, dann die Straße aussuchen und dann alle Hausnummern dazu anzeigen lassen. Die Hausnummern werden auch in den unteren Zoomstufen der Maps4BW angezeigt (open data; https://metadaten.geoportal-bw.de/geonetwork/srv/api/records/a9057669-fa59-e411-fabb-0c169f97a123).
DD1GJ (2023-09-18 07:24:42+00:00): Für Maps4BW hatten wir eine Nutzungsgenehmigung, aber das ist leider Geschichte. Jetzt wird im Geoportal BW der bundesweite Nachfolger verwendet, dessen Lizenz zu OSM inkompatibel ist.

Nochmals in aller Deutlichkeit: Lass momentan Deine Finger von allen Geobasisdaten des LGL. Durch Deine Missachtung der Nutzungsbedingungen schadest Du OSM.
ovruni (2023-09-13 22:03:39+00:00): Eliminación de veredas sin motivo aparente. Si tienes alguna duda sobre el mapeo de OSM en Perú tenemos el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmPe
APM39 (2023-12-17 03:43:07+00:00): Is is confirmed that piers are being constructed here, and this long?
woodpeck_repair (2023-11-06 23:59:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 143714070, 143714075 where the changeset comment is: revert von edits eines users nach selbstlöschung
pio2_122 (2023-09-13 23:59:16+00:00): Ponownie proszę o niełączenie granic administracyjnych z innymi obiektami.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/226452162
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1207608316
Qitay (2023-09-14 09:25:54+00:00): Ta zmiana tylko podzieliła obecna linie, cofnąłem to, czy jest coś jeszcze warte poprawy?
pio2_122 (2023-09-14 12:07:38+00:00): Dzięki za wyjaśnienia i wycofanie tej zmiany.

Do poprawy było rozdzielenie granicy połączonej z innymi obiektami w poprzednich edycjach, ale zrobiłem to już sam.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-09-13 22:50:27+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7613012279
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/382944039

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
osmviborg (2023-09-14 05:20:55+00:00): Næsten. De nye har været tilgængelige længe, husk at checke offset: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/quick-luftfoto-2023-nogle-omrader-i-danmark-er-klar/98511
Frans S (2023-09-16 13:10:54+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
This is a emergency mapping project to get buildings and roads mapped.
Please focus on that. Landuse areas are not requested to map and waste of time.
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141232420
JackNUMBER (2023-09-16 13:39:05+00:00): Hello, you right. I should created a dedicated changeset.
Kovoschiz (2023-09-14 09:21:31+00:00): !. While separate `addr:housenumber=` points is more detailed, you can still keep the main address used on the area. This aligns with the common practice in HK. 
2. Please don't delete `shop=` /  `amenity=` points as they still represent a shop space. Moreover, some have an address, especially they can have individual numbers in a range of address. You can remove the feature tags (by changing to a plain "point"), or modify them to be `was:shop=` / `was:amenity=` etc.
ovruni (2023-09-13 23:06:58+00:00): He notado que se han agregado varios negocios en pocos minutos desde esta cuenta en diferentes cuadras, lo cual sugiere que se hace uso de alguna fuente externa porque eso no se puede deducir desde Bing, ¿Cual es la fuente de estos datos?
Favio Duran (2023-09-13 23:13:21+00:00): La practica y por que se sin necesidad de un programa con data desactualizada que negocios o que edificio o que tienda hay en la zona ya que paso a dirario por esa zona.
ovruni (2023-09-13 23:29:45+00:00): La "practica" no es una fuente geolocalizada con varios negocios en diferentes cuadras. Por otra parte se le ha escrito sobre varios conjuntos de cambios, pero solamente se ha obtenido ediciones similares de su parte, generando guerras de ediciones. Como le he escrito en otros conjuntos de cambios por favor pongase en contacto mediante el canal de telegram de la comunidad en Perú https://t.me/osmPe
Saludos
Favio Duran (2023-09-13 23:32:35+00:00): No gracias.
ovruni (2023-09-13 23:05:19+00:00): Se agregaron edificios con layer ficticios
bxl-forever (2023-09-13 23:47:50+00:00): Hello,

This changeset is quite puzzling.  It contains changes in Canada (Quebec), Latvia and USA (Georgia).

Again, please upload your changes for one area *before* moving on to another part of the globe.

Here are some comments about the changes.

1) Latvia
Inspecting aerial imagery suggests this is allotments or something like a plant nursery, with small service tracks to connect the fields.
It is very unlikely those are residential roads (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/461488310).
Most EU contries have a very active mapping community, it would be very surprising that all local mappers would have missed that an entire neighbourhood with 15 streets would exist here.

2) Atlanta
The wood you added here (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1207613504) overlaps with a parking lot (see the existing road: it goes across your wood: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/198546693)
Same for the parking lot which you added here (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1207613493): it overlaps with the golf course.
It is always a good idea to spend a little more time making sure areas are properly drawn to avoid creating conflicts with existing objects.

Hope this helps.


(I think the part in Latvia should be reverted.  Changes in Canada and USA look globally okay, despite some geometry fixes to do.)
HellMap (2023-09-14 15:48:39+00:00): For Latvia, these are indeed allotments. By common convention, these are usually mapped with tracks and sometimes service roads if they are commonly used. Rarely residential roads unless they pass through and really connect to other things. So that wasn't a correct change. There is literally a segment with smoothness=impassable + surface=sand + width=0.5. I have reverted the changes in Latvia.
SomeoneElse (2023-09-14 00:26:03+00:00): Now complete.  For details of the Wolds Way see the superroute and two routes in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Long-distance_footpaths_in_the_United_Kingdom#National_Trails_%28England_and_Wales%29 .
For how this affects the E2, see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/long-distance-hiking-trails-project/8693/161 .
SomeoneElse (2023-09-14 00:26:35+00:00): Now complete.  See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/long-distance-hiking-trails-project/8693/161 .
ovruni (2023-09-13 23:33:24+00:00): Hola, le he escrito anteriormente sobre estos conjuntos de cambios, pero aun así he continuado. Por otra parte de su respuesta anterior puedo deducir que si ha leido los mensajes pero de manera selectiva solo ha deseado responder uno. Por estos motivos he revertido sus conjuntos de cambios.
Saludos
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 02:39:48+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153353333
DressyPear4 (2023-09-15 01:46:50+00:00): Por que adicionar o rio se ele já existe?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141233245
SomeoneElse (2023-09-14 00:26:59+00:00): See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/long-distance-hiking-trails-project/8693/161 .
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 02:37:07+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153353302
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 02:37:08+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153353302
Baloo Uriza (2023-09-14 11:55:11+00:00): Is this fairway really navigable to the power line you attached it to?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141233399
rivermont (2024-03-21 02:58:18+00:00): Most of these crossing were incorrectly edited, specifically the ones that are actual crossings on roads and not just parking lot entrances....
citrula (2023-09-14 16:49:14+00:00): Welcome to OSM!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141233677
Frans S (2023-10-04 07:58:10+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Here you identified a water reservoir and a walled area as 1 building.
Please  check if it is a building indeed.
I corrected these
Best regards
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 02:37:09+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153353302
CurlingMan13 (2023-09-14 17:35:54+00:00): Land covers should not partially overlap. (as you did with the fairways and greens).  The areas should either not overlap at all, or the smaller one should be wholly within the larger area.

Additionally, do not "lollipop" areas by creating "holes" with thin extensions to create a fake hole.

I have corrected the errors.  Avoid this in the future.  Feel free to take a look at the changes to understand how it should be mapped.
felipeeugenio (2023-09-14 11:38:02+00:00): Hola. A qué te refieres con barrios? en la foto satelital no se ve ningún barrio. Son los sitios?

A la espera de una respuesta voy a borrar el tag barrio, que definitivamente no és.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141234297
secondaryhighway (2023-09-14 01:40:49+00:00): Hi, why was this done?
ARostam03 (2023-09-14 05:54:45+00:00): Hi, according to the use of OSM, using non-Persian names causes confusion. First, I added multilingual names, then I decided to remove them.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-10-24 03:11:13+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173698009
Kai Johnson (2023-11-15 19:37:44+00:00): Thank you for restoring way/405833456 to natural=water + water=lagoon in a later changeset. The change to natural=reef wasn't correct.

However, this changeset removed way/725693850 from relations 1363096, 6082214, 6082562, 7168774, and 8080888. The replacement way/1213478528 was only added to relation/6082214. This means that a big piece of Manuae is no longer part of Îles Sous-le-Vent, Maupiti, the 987-03 boundary, or Îles de la Société. It would have been better to edit the old way in place. But now the replacement way should be added to all these relations. / Merci d'avoir restauré way/405833456 en natural=water + water=lagoon dans un ensemble de modifications ultérieur. Le changement vers natural=reef n'était pas correct.

Cependant, cet changeset a supprimé way/725693850 des relations 1363096, 6082214, 6082562, 7168774 et 8080888. Le remplacement way/1213478528 n'a été ajouté qu'à la relation/6082214. Cela signifie qu'une grande partie de Manuae ne fait plus partie des Îles Sous-le-Vent, de Maupiti, de la frontière 987-03 ou des Îles de la Société. Il aurait été préférable de modifier l'ancienne way en place. Mais maintenant, à toutes ces relations, il faut ajouter la voie du remplacement.
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 02:37:10+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153353302
Fizzie-DWG (2025-10-24 03:11:14+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173698009
Kai Johnson (2023-11-17 19:20:20+00:00): Il y a quelques problèmes avec les îlots dans cet changeset. Le way/1207628828 nécessite natural=littoral. Les way/1207628830 et way/1207628829 font correctement partie du littoral, mais comme les deux ways sont séparés, il leur manque la balise place=islet. Toutes les îles et îlots de cet atoll sont membres de la relation/1853318 pour la limite administrative et de la relation/8521998 pour la zone récifale. Ces îlots doivent être ajoutés aux relations.

Veuillez également ne pas utiliser la balise name=* pour les descriptions. Il existe souvent des balises plus spécifiques qui peuvent être utilisées pour ajouter plus de détails aux éléments. Si vous avez besoin d'aide avec les balises, veuillez demander à forum.openstreetmap.fr. Merci!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141234658
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 02:06:53+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153352994
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 02:37:11+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153353302
Fizzie-DWG (2025-10-24 03:11:15+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173698009
ZeLonewolf (2023-09-18 22:04:59+00:00): Hi, had to revert this change to highway classifications. The current documentation is at:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Rhode_Island/Highway_classification

which is the Rhode Island specific implementation of

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States/2021_Highway_Classification_Guidance

Everything is subject to debate of course, but the Mt Hope Bridge upgrade and the motorway_link change near Sprague Street are not right.  Motorways have pretty specific definitions, and _link roads need to connect to roads of their parent types.
StreetSurveyor (2023-09-18 23:03:34+00:00): Thanks for the assist on this one!
Kai Johnson (2023-11-18 00:44:03+00:00): Bon travail sur les bâtiments ! Est-ce que amenity=shelter + shelter_type=survival serait mieux que name=Abris de survie ?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141235002
Kai Johnson (2023-11-18 00:49:52+00:00): Je pense que cela est corrigé maintenant, mais soyez prudent avec tout way avec natural=coastline. Ces ways sont membres de nombreuses relations qui doivent également être mises à jour si vous modifiez, supprimez ou remplacez le way.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141235234
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 02:34:24+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153353283
Kai Johnson (2023-11-24 14:49:23+00:00): Soyez prudent lorsque vous supprimez des éléments du littoral. Ces éléments sont membres de plusieurs relations de limites naturelles et administratives et leur suppression peut rompre les relations.

Veuillez également ne pas utiliser la balise de nom pour les descriptions.
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 02:34:25+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153353283
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 02:16:41+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153353108
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 02:57:50+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153353532
Kai Johnson (2023-11-18 01:00:08+00:00): Taiaro a l'air très bien ! Bien joué! Deux choses pourraient l’améliorer. Veillez à garder la plage à l'intérieur du littoral. Et peut-être que water=lagoon serait mieux que name=Lagon.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141235535
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 02:02:41+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153352953
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 02:34:26+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153353283
Fizzie-DWG (2025-10-24 03:17:39+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173698104
Kai Johnson (2023-11-18 01:32:02+00:00): Le littoral de cet atoll s'inscrit dans plusieurs relations. Tout nouvel îlot doit également être ajouté aux mêmes relations. Lorsque way/22388214 a été supprimé, il a été supprimé des relations. Le remplacement way/1207641966 doit être ajouté aux relations.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141235730
Kai Johnson (2023-11-24 15:20:19+00:00): Soyez prudent lorsque vous supprimez des éléments du littoral. Ces éléments sont membres de plusieurs relations de limites naturelles et administratives et leur suppression peut rompre les relations.
Frans S (2023-10-03 09:42:35+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
You mapped the trace of a river as a tertiary highway. Be careful to tag these tracks as roads, since these are (dry) riverbeds.  The river itself is mapped just a few meters to the west.
Best regards
ZLima12 (2023-09-22 14:58:50+00:00): Hi AlexMQ,

Great edit! I don't think there's any real criticism I can give, since everything is pretty spot-on, but there are a couple notes that I have.

First of all, for imagery, I see that you used Mapbox Satellite. In my experience, Mapbox tends to have the highest resolution, but is severely outdated (something like 10 years old I believe), and sometimes has issues with its projection (e.g. things appearing at an angle, bridges appear cut in two pieces). For this reason, I will sometimes use Mapbox as a secondary imagery source, but not without creating an offset to align it with my primary source, and verifying that nothing has changed too much in the area I'm mapping (since the imagery is old).

I tend to use NYS Orthos Online (called NYSDOP Orthoimagery in iD) as my main imagery, since it's provided by the state and they have a pretty good program. Unlike some other commercial imagery sources, this source is very consistent across the state. Bing is very good these days in cities, but in rural areas it can be really bad. Anyway, I'd recommend using NYS Orthos when it's good enough, but I will admit that its resolution isn't as good as others. When you need the extra resolution, I'd recommend trying Bing first, and then Mapbox, both with an offset to NYS Orthos if possible.

Another note I have is that in case you aren't using one already, there are plugins that automate the creation of grids like the parking spaces you added. I would highly recommend using them if you make more edits like this in the future, as they make the work dozens of times faster.

Also, try to specify your source for data beyond what is apparent from imagery. In JOSM, you can add this in the source box which by default just has your imagery used. Some common ones include "survey" (used by StreetComplete, generally considered to be the strongest source), "local knowledge" (for things where you might not have gone to the site and inspected closely, but you know about since you live in the area), or even just a link to the website that you found the information from. If you knew this information from local knowledge, you could format the source field as "Mapbox Satellite;local knowledge".

Anyway, great edit, thanks for putting so much thought into your work!

Best,
John
AlexMQ (2023-09-24 03:40:00+00:00): Thanks for the great notes!

I didn't realize Mapbox was so old, I'll make sure to work off of NYS Ortho going forward

I did get JOSM Gridify already, I'm not that masochistic! I wouldn't make lots like this without it

Good suggestion with sources, I'll include that going forward too. So far all my edits in the area are mainly local knowledge, with extra details backed up by survey

Thanks again for the review!

Best,
Alex
Kai Johnson (2023-11-24 15:23:46+00:00): Veuillez ne pas utiliser la balise de nom pour des descriptions telles que name=Forêt. Utiliser la balise naturel=bois suffit.
Kai Johnson (2023-11-24 15:25:20+00:00): Soyez prudent lorsque vous modifiez des éléments du littoral. Ces éléments sont membres de plusieurs relations de limites naturelles et administratives et leur suppression peut rompre les relations.

Veuillez également ne pas utiliser la balise de nom pour les descriptions.
Kai Johnson (2023-11-24 15:34:42+00:00): Pour cartographier correctement le récif, il faut une relation avec un polygone externe et avec les îles et le lagon comme membres internes. Voici quelques exemples : https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1DTq

Assurez-vous également que les éléments du littoral sont membres de toutes les relations naturelles et administratives appropriées.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-10-24 03:17:40+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173698104
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 02:57:51+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153353532
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 02:34:27+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153353283
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 02:55:54+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153353508
user_5359 (2023-09-14 05:02:44+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I remove your SEO SPAM (mostly foreign keys).
Fizzie-DWG (2025-10-24 03:17:41+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173698104
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 02:02:42+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153352953
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 02:55:55+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153353508
woodpeck_repair (2023-11-06 23:59:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 143714070, 143714075 where the changeset comment is: revert von edits eines users nach selbstlöschung
Fizzie-DWG (2025-10-24 03:17:42+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173698104