piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Rashid86 (2024-04-27 09:05:34+00:00): Vandal вандал
mikimapbuilder (2024-04-25 06:25:39+00:00): Modified address and removed descriptive name of an object
mueschel (2024-04-26 08:36:40+00:00): Hi,
what does 'direzione' mean on these bus stops? Is this the number of the bus route? That could be tagged as 'route_ref'.
gigi2037 (2024-04-26 12:01:26+00:00): direzione e il seticato di cancellnso in cui va la linea lo messa per me, ho dimenticato di cancellare la riga.
ciao Gigi
gigi2037 (2024-04-26 12:21:44+00:00): cancellato di sicuro ce ne sono ancora che ho dimenticato
mweper (2024-04-24 22:54:08+00:00): Hola. Sólo para mi conocimiento, ¿Cuál fue el motivo de estas eliminaciones de etiquetado? En la wiki se especifica que se permiten los nodos con estas etiquetas.
Saludos.
serock (2024-04-24 23:45:08+00:00): Hola mweper, tenia entendido que los nodos no pueden tener la misma propiedad que las vías, si son parte de ella (vía), si estoy equivocado, lo revierto.
Saludos.
mweper (2024-04-25 22:06:28+00:00): Entendido, perfecto entonces. Desconozco como se etiqueta adecuadamente y me basé solo en la wiki del etiquetado. Tampoco encontré alguna herramienta de validación que controle eso para dejarlo correcto.

Saludos.
serock (2024-04-25 22:35:49+00:00): Hola mweper, y si solo se pusiera el nodo al final de la vía sin que sea parte de ella (vía), ahí sí, el nodo podría tener la propiedad "aeroway"="parking_position", "ref"="3A", sin que eso genere algún error de validación.
Ej.: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7243179750
Saludos.
OSM_RogerWilco (2024-06-04 06:25:44+00:00): Hello Niels Elgaard Larsen,

I would like to ask you again not to edit changes made by local users without local knowledge.

Your changes are not correct, so I have reverted them.

Best regards
Roger Wilco
ivanbranco (2024-04-27 22:57:20+00:00): Is this really a beach?
Szymson (2024-04-28 16:53:43+00:00): Skąd wynika taka dziwna nazwa:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11845558301
wierci (2024-04-28 17:15:28+00:00): Dzięki Szymon, literówka! Już poprawione
emvee (2024-04-24 22:03:55+00:00): Niet Arnhem maar Duiven 50 km/h, geen parkeerterrein maar wel *=use_sidepath; fietspad verbeterd
Glassman (2024-05-01 02:25:40+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150469231
jonls (2024-04-25 06:48:03+00:00): It looks like the shoreline may have moved accidentally? Was your aerial imagery offset maybe?
Glassman (2024-05-01 02:25:32+00:00): #TIP: save and upload your edits before moving to a distant location.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150469838
Dimitar155 (2024-05-09 18:31:34+00:00): Изглежда много добре! https://www.osm.org/way/904431766 дали е еднопосочен? Има знак стоп и "задължително завиване надясно", а трамваите трудно биха завили надясно.

https://www.bing.com/maps?cp=42.697782%7E23.313443&lvl=17.0&v=2&sV=1&pi=-8.2&style=x&dir=55.3
tevildo_ (2024-05-09 22:37:55+00:00): good catch, thanks, ще го направя двупосочно и тия дни ще мина да потвърдя
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-04-25 00:41:00+00:00): Some granularity readded in subsequent changsets
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-04-25 22:22:59+00:00): Please don't remove highway tags
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150470476
btwhite92 (2024-04-25 00:36:35+00:00): Hi Tim,
I responded on the previous changeset, but I will respond again here. There is essentially universal consensus in the US that a highway with zero grade-separated intersections and numerous driveways accessing properties directly cannot be a freeway/motorway. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States/2021_Highway_Classification_Guidance for more info. I would also encourage you to post to the US community forum if you would like more discussion regarding what qualifies as a freeway/motorway: https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/us/78. 

Because this section categorically does not meet the criteria in the guidance above, which was arrived at after years of community discussion and represents the best consensus we have in the US so far, I will be reverting this again and will escalate further attempts to tag this section as 'motorway'. 

Best,
Bradley
vng_me (2024-04-25 01:42:30+00:00): This is *not* a coastline. Please, read OSM wiki about natural=coastline tag.
Brummelwuff (2024-05-09 20:08:53+00:00): Hey. Sorry for our los. I think the Hole is a difficult think to los. Normelie in the OSM comunetie we categories it with the lifecycle prefix demolished:
Lumikeiju (2024-04-25 18:32:31+00:00): Hello, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Thanks for your contributions via StreetComplete! Happy mapping :D
Glassman (2024-05-01 02:28:14+00:00): #TIP: instead of deleting object, just update the geometry. For example, removing the building in Moscow, resulted in the loss of an address.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150471870
felipeeugenio (2024-06-01 16:39:50+00:00): Hola. Si completas la totalidad de los números de casas de una cuadra, entonces puedes borrar las interpolaciones. Estaríamos duplicando npumeros solamente
saludos y buen trabajo
rhtb0 (2024-04-25 10:16:58+00:00): 유성JC ~ 회덕JC 구간은 호남고속도로지선과 중첩, 회덕JC ~ 청주JC 구간은 경부고속도로와 중첩, 낙동JC ~ 상주JC 구간은 상주영천고속도로와 중첩구간입니다.
rhtb0 (2024-04-25 10:34:14+00:00): 통영대전고속도로와 중부고속도로처럼 해제했다면 모를까 엄연히 중복지정 구간으로 1;30이나 251;30은 유효합니다.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-04-25 22:26:11+00:00): Reviewed
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150472502
TagaSanPedroAko (2024-04-25 22:49:40+00:00): this is not a bad change, this just restored POIs and some roads deleted in a related edit.
hoserab (2024-04-25 15:38:04+00:00): Thank you. :)
Glassman (2024-05-01 02:29:45+00:00): Did you mean to remove the information board tag? Now I'm not sure what's tagged. Can you review this edit.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150472839
fortera_au (2024-04-25 03:04:05+00:00): Hi there, please try and keep changesets to a smaller area, this one crosses the whole world!
julcnx (2024-04-25 08:48:41+00:00): hey, thanks for your contributions. what did you change exactly ? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments#:~:text=A%20good%20changeset%20comment%20should,edited%20and%20the%20sources%20used.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150473142
Mxdanger (2024-04-25 19:28:57+00:00): Reverted by #150511320
Glassman (2024-05-01 02:34:55+00:00): The north end of the service road should be open since there buildings there. I removed the no access to that portion of the service road. Let me know if this is wrong.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150473299
relaemanila 2 (2024-05-01 10:29:51+00:00): What is administrative in existing.
Glassman (2024-05-01 02:22:04+00:00): The east side of the trail you added is likely connected to one of the two service roads. 

Also, where the footway crosses the stream, tag that section, bridge=yes + layer=1.

Can you review this edit?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150473842
erickdeoliveiraleal (2024-07-17 14:24:26+00:00): deleted castles;
Glassman (2024-05-01 02:17:37+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150473980
Glassman (2024-05-01 02:18:37+00:00): usually the roof over the fuel pumps are tagged with the gas station info. The building is likely a convenience store.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150474029
Supaplex (2024-04-27 15:06:03+00:00): Why do you deleted those imported address nodes?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150474677
Supaplex (2024-04-27 15:03:03+00:00): Why do you delete those imported address nodes?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150474781
Supaplex (2024-04-27 14:56:05+00:00): Hi

Why do you delete those address nodes, those are all imported from the government source
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150474966
mcliquid (2024-04-25 13:14:33+00:00): Hi,

please note: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:web to
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
CasperGeo (2024-07-03 08:52:03+00:00): Hi Syahmin, please to to improve identifying building outlines and to square (press q) buildings.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150475276
syntex (2025-01-27 17:22:23+00:00): Dlaczego rozdzielasz proste poligony na kilkadziesiąt linii? To jest bardzo zła praktyka, która pogarsza jakość danych i utrudnia mapowanie innym.
BartekChom (2025-01-27 20:07:00+00:00): No tak, mogłem się spodziewać, że w końcu wyjdzie, że coś naknociłem. Nie miałem siły prowadzić drugiej linii przez te same punkty. "I encourage you to use JOSM for editing OSM data!" - no tak, i pewnie powiesz, że JOSM to potrafi. Zresztą zdaje się, że nawet jeśli chodziło o wygodę, to przesadziłem z krojeniem. W dodatku teraz jest mniejsza nadmiarowość, ale jak kiedyś będzie trzeba rozkleić te linie, to będzie trudniej. Aj, przepraszam, wygląda, że wiem, co źle zrobiłem (chociaż właściwie nie jestem pewien, czy dobrze zgaduję, o co dokładnie Ci chodzi), tylko przeraża mnie myśl, że mam obiecać, że więcej tego nie zrobię i obklikiwać albo opanowywać JOSM. No właśnie, przepraszam, dzisiaj już jestem zmęczony, naprawdę mylę się przy pisaniu, jeśli masz więcej instrukcji, to napisz, jak będę miał więcej siły, to się do nich odniosę, teraz nie wiem, czy się tłumaczę, czy co.
syntex (2025-01-27 21:01:17+00:00): Tzn. nie musisz już tu nic zmieniać/ naprawiać, bo już to zrobiłem. Ale polecam zapoznanie się z programem JOSM i jego możliwościami, bo naprawdę można pewne rzeczy robić prościej i szybciej niż w przeglądarce.
BartekChom (2025-01-28 04:24:07+00:00): Aha, dziękuję, w sumie już zauważyłem. JOSM już próbowałem używać, jakoś nie wytrzymałem, ale skoro mówisz, że nie należy używać relacji do prostych wielokątów, mam miejsce, żeby poćwiczyć dublowanie linii: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18466021
BartekChom (2025-01-28 17:17:12+00:00): Wreszcie.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161865977
Linie mogłem dublować literką F po wyznaczeniu pierwszych dwu punktów, za to musiałem się nawalczyć, żeby scalić linie, a na przeniesienie tagów z relacji na połączony wielokąt nie znalazłem lepszego sposobu niż zapisać i edytować XML w edytorze tekstu. Tak to się robi, czy źle podszedłem i są lepsze sposoby?
aharvey (2025-03-12 10:40:25+00:00): Hi, this track you added has been recently deleted, did you have any local knowledge you can add?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1255574200/history
Cam-I-Am (2025-03-12 11:07:16+00:00): Hi @aharvey, thanks for the heads up.

There is absolutely a track there, even if it is not sanctioned by council. The Southern end of it is very well defined and appears "constructed". It becomes overgrown quite quickly but is still passable on foot. I suspect it was an official track at some point, but has been intentionally abandoned by council for rewilding.

I note that the user who deleted it has "Manningham Council" in their name. It seems someone at the local council is not happy about this unofficial track being mapped, despite the OSM policies you linked to.

It's been a year or two since I've been through this track but I'm pretty sure there's no "keep out" sign, so this track would fit squarely in the "Informal paths" definition: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Cycling_and_Foot_Paths#Informal_Paths

Should we revert the deletion and bring the path back?
aharvey (2025-03-12 11:30:26+00:00): Yeah I think based on your knowledge here reverting back is best, and possibly adding informal=yes.
philam48 (2025-03-12 21:17:36+00:00): Thanks for tagging me in the other comments. My knowledge of this path is the same as Cam-I-Am and I also support reverting the deletion.
aharvey (2025-03-12 23:28:22+00:00): Thanks looks like a positive outcome here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1255574200/history
Glassman (2024-05-01 02:36:06+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150475466
phoenixsaigon1698 (2024-04-27 02:42:35+00:00): Hello anh Long, đoạn này chỉ cấm 1 chiều oto theo giờ thôi nhé. từ 22h-6h vẫn cho xe oto đi 2 chiều bình thường. Xe máy thì luôn đi 2 chiều được vì vậy anh đừng đổi như thế.
phoenixsaigon1698 (2024-04-27 02:58:24+00:00): Đã có biển báo https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16204487 có chức năng cấm oto rẽ phải từ Võ Thị Sáu vào Thạch Thị Thanh từ 6h-22h. loại trừ xe máy, xe đạp.
35P8MUJOBA (2024-04-25 05:47:05+00:00): ok
fortera_au (2024-04-25 05:37:01+00:00): Hey, is this actually a park? It's an odd shape to be a park.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150476139
Tomas Straupis (2024-04-25 08:02:02+00:00): Atšauksiu šitą pakeitimas. Šitas objektas yra šiuo metu KVR registruotas paveldo objektas, todėl į jį nereikėtų prikabinėti kitų objektų informacijos.
fortera_au (2024-04-25 06:12:55+00:00): Hi, just wondering if you got the name of the creek from a survey (on the ground) or another source?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150476719
Glassman (2024-04-25 17:12:34+00:00): I think your first edit was better. The wiki recommends seamark:type=wreck. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Seamarks/Wrecks

Please review this edit.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150476965
WoodWoseWulf (2024-04-25 20:36:16+00:00): Hello, the correct tag for swimming pools is leisure=swimming_pool not natural=water. These are not natural bodies of water.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-04-25 06:10:28+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4289392815
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/580223924

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2024-04-25 06:40:15+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2706324094
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/541613903

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Hufkratzer (2024-04-25 16:00:59+00:00): Hi,
If https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/127594852 is a horse riding arena, then please tag it as a riding arena and not as a riding center. For riding arenas there is a different preset in iD which sets the tags leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian. If the surface is sand that can be specified by surface=sand. And if the arena does not have a real name or house number/ address in real life then they don't need to be added in OSM. Example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1100642184
Compare
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a#Riding_centre_(equestrian)
Hufkratzer (2024-05-17 22:15:13+00:00): Sorry, this was the wrong link, I meant https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1275948527. I have retagged the arena.
flohoff (2024-04-25 07:46:37+00:00): Au backe - Good catch. Was hab ich denn da veranstaltet - und spannend das das so lange keinem Aufgefallen ist.

Das muss ich aus versehen auf "l" gedrückt habe ohne es zu merken.

Ich habs jetzt mitbekommen weil im routing die strecke ~5s langsamer geworden ist.

Danke für die korrektur.

Flo
Basstoelpel (2024-04-28 21:18:20+00:00): Da mir solche Fehler selbst schon passiert sind, war es für mich einfach, das zu beheben, nachdem ich es bemerkt habe. Magst Du einen bug report für JOSM schreiben: begradingen/rechtwinklig machen/kreisförmig machen/gleichmäßig anordnen (sonstige?) sollten einen Dialog erzeugen, wenn das zu ändernde Objekt das FoV um mehr als 10% überschreitet oder kleiner als -ich sag mal 30%- des FoV ist.
Wenn ich nicht zufällig auf die Osmose-bugs geschaut hätte, wär's mir auch nicht aufgefallen.
Vielleicht sollten ein paar  shortkeys per default disabled sein (grr, ich hasse Denglisch).

Gruß,

Baßtölpel
flohoff (2024-04-29 15:47:59+00:00): Ich will ja keine weiteren dialoge die ständig aufpoppen. Ich will gar nicht so viel die Maus benutzen. Das meiste im JOSM mache ich ja über die Tastatur - Maus nur um irgendwas wirklich anzuklicken.

Normalerweise sehe ich so fehler auch sofort - und ctrl-z ist schnell gedrückt - aber das hier ist ja offensicht _mir_ durchgerutscht und es hat scheinbar lange keiner gesehen.

Deshalb - Danke das du es gefixed hast.

Ich finde man muss in changeset kommentaren auch mal was nettes schreiben nicht immer nur maulen ;) Deshalb bedanke ich mich auch mal.

Flo
mike140 (2024-04-25 18:53:15+00:00): При перейменуванні старі назви зберігаємо з тегом old_name
NorthCrab_upload (2024-04-25 07:00:25+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11846418006

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
user_21293476 (2024-04-25 07:46:16+00:00): 位置反而歪了。不同卫星图偏移度不一样，如涉及建筑的位置，最好不要动，谢谢
martried (2024-06-01 16:13:24+00:00): #480448808 ist auch kein abgetrennter Fußweg, so wie #36298685 am Ende des Parkplatzes.
eggie (2024-07-12 08:27:32+00:00): Hi Paul,
Please decrease your edit area.
Greetz,
eggie
Paulosm2016 (2024-07-15 09:16:07+00:00): How should I do that when fixing USA boundary?
eggie (2024-07-15 09:21:06+00:00): Hi.. You are right. In this special case not.
Greetz..
eggie
jcr83 (2024-05-23 21:01:30+00:00): Bonjour,
Est-ce que ce sentier est officiellement interdit d'accès (par exemple par arrêté municipal) ?
OT Haut-Jura Grandvaux (2024-05-28 07:43:20+00:00): Bonjour,
en fait il s'agit d'un sentier sauvage qui s'est fait par le passage volontaire ou involontaire de promeneurs. Sur ce site nous sommes à 115 000 visiteurs par an, dont la moitié fait l'aller-retour. Par volonté de s'approcher de la falaise pour la vue, ou par inadvertance en loupant la signalétique, les promeneurs marchent sur cette partie qui se transforme en sentier. 
Il n'y a donc pas d'arrêté municipal mais si besoin, la mairie pourra en prendre un pour vous le faire parvenir. 
Bien cordialement
Office de tourisme 
03 84 60 15 25
jcr83 (2024-05-29 07:22:26+00:00): Bonjour,
S'il n'y a pas d'interdiction, il ne faut pas mettre access=no.
Pour un sentier sauvage, mettre informal=yes.
J'ai corrigé ce sentier, mais il y en a peut-être d'autres à revoir.
Cordialement.
OT Haut-Jura Grandvaux (2024-05-30 08:09:17+00:00): Bonjour, je vous remercie.
utteringmute (2024-06-20 05:51:45+00:00): Building modified correctly.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150479090
mcliquid (2024-04-25 13:10:49+00:00): Hi,

please note: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:web to
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
thetornado76 (2024-04-25 14:05:56+00:00): Sorry, I forgot to upload in between. There should be two changes.
Vinber-Pro (2024-04-25 12:25:07+00:00): Bonjour Solange,
ici tu as ajouté sans doute un batiment en double, par dessus un autre.
Si tu veux améliorer un batiment, tu le modifie, tu n'ajoutes pas en double !
Merci pour ces contributions
Andrea Musuruane (2024-04-25 16:04:06+00:00): Ciao. Italian bar -> amenity=cafe, American bar -> amenity=bar. QUi ho corretto io. Ciao, Andrea
Gianni Bragante (2024-04-25 16:35:01+00:00): Grazie per la correzione, è un errore che avevo fatto 10 anni fa quando avevo inserito il POI per la prima volta.
Oggi ho solo cambiato il nome
Glassman (2024-05-01 02:38:18+00:00): #TIP: we don't use descriptive names - can you remove the name?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150479668
akimapbuilder (2024-04-25 07:50:36+00:00): Hi! I had to revert your changeset since there is no building in sight.
akimapbuilder (2024-04-25 07:51:18+00:00): You draw building over backyard, try to avoid that. Thanks
user_14840936 (2024-04-25 23:29:44+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:railway%3Dstop
Branko Kokanovic (2024-04-25 08:14:38+00:00): Zasto si stavila access=no ovde? Sto samo nisi obrisala put? Koji je izvor ovih podataka? Ako treba, mislim da ce Microsoft editorial tim da skoci da pomogne celom megataxiju da vas nauci kako da editujete, samo treba da pitate! Ali ako planiras da dodajes jos tagova osim imena iz katastra, raspravi prvo bar sa communitijem?
---
Why did you put access=no here? Why not delete way? What is source of this change? If needed, I am sure that Microsoft editorial crew would GLADLY jump and do tutorial/explanation how to edit OSM for whole of editorial team of megataxi, you just have to ask! But if you plan to add other tags than cadastre names, please sync with community
aleksandra991 (2024-04-25 09:03:42+00:00): слепа улица али нисам исекла само сам је затворила
Branko Kokanovic (2024-04-25 08:21:05+00:00): Napravila si nemogucu jednosmernu ulicu ovde (poslednji deo Miodraga Komatine). Koji ti je izvor podataka?

---
You created impossible oneway here (last part of Miodraga Komatine). What is source of your changes?
aleksandra991 (2024-04-25 09:03:13+00:00): извор такси кућа из новог пазара
MarinoBM (2024-04-25 09:34:27+00:00): Hola nig82. Gracias por contribuir a mejorar el mapa.
Si algo no sabes lo que es no debes eliminarlo. Este elemento se puso en respuesta a una nota publicada en OSM.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136475810#map=16/41.6315/-4.7113
 Si tienes alguna duda aquí puedes plantearla 
https://t.me/osmcyl