piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
oba510 (2025-11-23 09:48:41+00:00): Hi, fyi you broke the member order on a bus route relation (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9656915) here when you split the way. (it's been fixed)
PedestrianMapping_HiddenRoute (2025-11-24 06:31:08+00:00): Hi, I will be more careful while editing highways with relations going forward. Thank you.
CAM-Gerlach (2026-05-24 22:25:06+00:00): Fixed wrongly-abbreviated street name (that was already fixed for you before) in changeset 183129352

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183129352
Baloo Uriza (2025-12-02 16:15:19+00:00): This has been a diverging diamond interchange for a few years now.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175409773
oba510 (2025-11-23 09:39:01+00:00): Hi, fyi you broke the member order on a few bus route relations here when you split the way. (it's been fixed)
Poprawiłem (2026-06-30 10:59:33+00:00): Zabrakło jeszcze stwierdzenia: "a reedbed nie jest ani wodą ani lądem" w opisie.
maraf24 (2026-07-01 18:56:24+00:00): Nie rozumiem.
Za to pamiętam, że w terenie na dużym obszarze było tylko woda, bez trzciny, tam gdzie była zmapowana.
pitscheplatsch (2026-02-03 16:38:42+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178050925
Negreheb (2025-11-13 08:09:40+00:00): Grüß dich, schön, dass du mitmachst. 

Du hast hier wohl unabsichtlich den Matzner Wald kaputt gemacht https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/282789 mit diesen Änderungen. 
iD tut sich da leider ein bisschen schwerer mit Relationen, da kann das schonmal passieren :)

Kannst du das selbst reparieren, oder soll jemand anderes mal drauf schauen? 



#remindme 2025-11-21
Luzandro (2025-11-16 19:04:45+00:00): Es sind auch andere Flächen gelöscht worden, wie das Wohngebiet von Ebenthal, oder Flächengrenzen in tracks geändert worden. Verstreut über etliche Changesets in der letzten Woche - das ist nicht mehr ganz trivial, nur die Fehler zu korrigieren oder rückgängig zu machen.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25141707/history

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1208080414/history
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174556023
Luzandro (2025-11-29 08:35:14+00:00): Ich habe den Matznerwald westlich der L11 wiederhergestellt, nachdem östlich davon im Gemeindegebiet von Ebenthal schon neue Wälder mit eigenem Namen angelegt wurden. Dort habe ich den restlichen Wald außerhalb von Ebenthal als neues Multipolygon ohne Namen wiederhergestellt. 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/282789

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19895053

Bitte Flächen nicht mit Wegen oder administrativen Grenzen verbinden (oder auch nicht Wege mit Grenzen), das macht die weitere Bearbeitung sehr fehleranfällig und mühsam. Wenn man beim Zeichnen der Flächen im iD-Editor die Alt-Taste gedrückt hält, verhindert man, dass der neue Punkt mit Objekten in der Nähe verbunden wird.

"It is strongly discouraged to glue landuse to road lines. Glued landuse makes the data much harder to work with."

osm.wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dresidential

nebeneinander liegende Flächen sollten dagegen miteinander verbunden sein und sich v.a. nicht schneiden und überlappen. Durch Drücken der Taste "F" für "folgen" kann man dem Verlauf eines anderen ways folgen.

Flurnamen sollten besser nur als place=locality node (im iD-Editor "Örtlichkeit", aber wird auch unter "Flurname" gefunden) und nicht als benannte landuse-Fläche angegeben werden, insbesondere sollte nicht wie hier bei "Altes Gebirge" eine große Ackerfläche rundherum mit diesem Namen eingetragen werden, wenn dort tatsächlich Weinberge sind

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13338693938

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:place%3Dlocality
Alexmol (2025-11-12 12:01:01+00:00): Torres de comunicações móveis, não postos de carregamento
HAALAND_ (2026-03-02 03:02:19+00:00): 你好，name标签里应该添加当地语言“简体中文”而不是英文
Alexmol (2025-11-12 12:12:25+00:00): Actualização de postos de carregamento, não de antenas
Alexmol (2025-11-12 12:12:34+00:00): Actualização de postos de carregamento, não de antenas
dzamper (2025-11-12 12:24:48+00:00): Jeśli faktycznie istnieje tylko jest naturalnego pochodzenia, to zamiast usuwać lepiej przetagować (na `natural=earth_bank` np.)
ilias_ (2025-11-12 12:57:50+00:00): C'est validé, merci
keyyushi (2025-12-06 14:00:32+00:00): Haritada bulunan eczaneyi kaldırıp üstüne kendi dükkanınızı koymuşsunuz. Değişikliği geri aldım.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175587376
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2025-11-12 15:54:47+00:00): 你给人退完了，你不在原来的评论区底下留言这个changeset的id，别人怎么知道已经有人工作过了？？？？？？？
这不是人为制造重复review吗？
eggie (2025-11-14 10:50:32+00:00): Dit is ok al aangepast door een medemapper.
Dus op de adresnode als social_facility. 
Groet,
eggie
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:45:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321633 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - United States
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-18 08:34:58+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with malformed tags (name=*, opening_hours=*) and source=* of Google Maps, which is not allowed by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ), in changeset 184260023

https://osm.org/changeset/184260023
eggie (2025-11-12 20:20:45+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
dp7 (2025-11-12 16:51:36+00:00): Ciao TBonanno
L'uso del tag place=suburb è improprio in questo caso, ti riporto la descrizione della wiki: "Sobborgo - Grosso quartiere di una città (non necessariamente periferico) con un nome ben definito e spesso una sua identità distinta."
trial (2025-11-13 22:16:23+00:00): les abréviations sont à proscrire dans OSM (sauf dans short_name) :
C. Ccial la Galerie
n'est donc pas correct
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2025-11-14 07:41:39+00:00): Merci de votre alerte, correction effectuée

Cordialement,
L'Equipe DB
NorthCrab_upload (2025-11-14 00:15:11+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13299558722

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
rempshaener (2025-11-12 16:23:17+00:00): Hello,
this street (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1625309021478698&focus=photo&x=0.022391281798264384&y=0.5876459503503878&zoom=0&lat=49.3049017&lng=8.6435288&z=17) is a living_street.
A speed limit 7 km/h for living streets in Germany is wrong, a possible value would be „walk“, which also should not be used (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway=living%20street?uselang=de): „In Deutschland sollte keine zusätzliche Geschwindigkeitsbeschränkung mittels maxspeed=* gesetzt werden. Die offizielle Geschwindigkeit ist in der StVO mit Schrittgeschwindigkeit angegeben. Alle numerischen Werte entspringen einer uneinheitlichen Rechtsprechung. maxspeed= kann als implizierter Standardwert angenommen werden und braucht daher nicht gesetzt zu werden.“ = „In Germany, no additional speed limit should be set using maxspeed=*. The official speed is specified in the StVO (German Road Traffic Regulations) as walking pace. All numerical values originate from inconsistent case law. maxspeed=walk can be assumed to be the implied default value and therefore does not need to be set.“
I reverted your changeset.
Best regards
empty_child (2025-12-14 13:13:33+00:00): Добрый день. Насколько мне известно, на данной дороге нет никакого движения, как и планов восстановления. В связи с этим и disused. Если у вас есть другая информация, поделитесь, пожалуйста. Иначе значения будут возвращены в неиспользуемые
Andrea Musuruane (2025-11-13 08:46:42+00:00): Il tagging corretto e' access=private. Gli altri tag sono errati. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174560302
Szymson (2025-11-12 16:58:46+00:00): Powtarzam po raz wtóry. Przejścia dla zwierząt nie służą do przechodzenia przez pieszych. Ludzie zostawiają tam swój zapach i odstraszają tym samym migrujące zwierzęta.
Andrea Musuruane (2025-11-13 08:45:22+00:00): Il tagging corretto e' access=private e non access=no. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174560718
Andrea Musuruane (2025-11-13 08:47:58+00:00): Il commento precedente e' errato. Qui sono stati inseriti dei passaggi a livello su una ferrovia (mentre dalle foto aeree si vede che la strada passa sotto).
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174560718
Andrea Musuruane (2025-11-13 08:56:31+00:00): MI taccio e' cambio occhiali. Non avevo visto le note #5043305 e #4270531
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174560718
Gregory Peony (2025-12-14 05:31:53+00:00): hi, the right footprint represents a building, the left represents a yard. hope this helps.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174560823
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:39:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321366 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Brazil
BCNorwich (2025-11-12 16:57:11+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The roads can clearly be seen and even if they are private they are still features that can be mapped to OSM. Thus I've reinstated them. I have however tagged the two gates as access=private which means the public has no open access beyond them.

The ways can be seen to be accessed by vehicle thus they are for descriptive purposes highways.

Regards Bernard.
YannElis (2025-11-12 17:05:40+00:00): Hi Bernard, 
I am the General manager of this place. The roads do not exist anymore this has been transformed more than 12 years ago. The same way as we do not show the internal factory road going around our facilities in SW19 3UY.
BCNorwich (2025-11-12 17:43:07+00:00): That's strange because they show in imagery of 2025. There's nothing wrong with internal factory roads being shown on OpenStreetMap, indeed they are shown other maps as well.
BCNorwich (2025-11-12 17:03:24+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've reverted the road status back from unclassified to primary as I can see no reason to lower its status.

Regards Bernard.
NeisBot (2025-11-12 14:24:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisBot (2025-11-12 14:24:42+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Centro assistenza informatica per riparazione e upgrade di computer"
NeisBot (2025-11-12 14:24:45+00:00): Ad esempio, una versione più neutra e fattuale della tua descrizione potrebbe essere: "Centro assistenza informatica per riparazione e upgrade di computer"
---
(Auto-translation)
Il Bravo tecnico Mario (2025-11-12 14:52:13+00:00): Salve, grazie per la revisione, aggiorno subito con la descrizione proposta.
Il Bravo tecnico Mario (2025-11-12 15:02:53+00:00): Salve, grazie per la celere verifica.

- PcApposto è il nome dell'azienda
- Il Bravo Tecnico Mario è il tecnico informatico che lavora all'interno della PcApposto.

Chiedo un riesame della descrizione.
Grazie.
NeisReview (2025-11-18 14:11:34+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/174818199
Il Bravo tecnico Mario (2025-11-18 17:55:00+00:00): Salve, cosa vuol dire: parzialmente ripristinato? La ringrazio cordiali saluti.
pitscheplatsch (2025-11-18 18:10:46+00:00): Ciao, non sono riuscito a trovare la modifica alla descrizione, quindi per ora l’ho rimossa. Il tuo annuncio è ancora disponibile qui: 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13299676228

Se vuoi, puoi aggiungere una nuova descrizione in seguito. Come già detto, cerca di mantenerla un po’ più neutra.

---
(Auto-translation)
Udarian (2025-11-12 17:26:49+00:00): Small note, the image tag for a picture of the features (in this case the business from the outside or something similar) not the logo of the business.
miamicityman (2025-11-12 18:06:00+00:00): Changed image per recommendation. Thank you.
MassCartog (2026-04-10 17:42:11+00:00): Hello! Features you removed in this changeset are valid. Please don’t remove valid OSM data.

You might not be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground. If it exists on the ground, it is valid data regardless of a feature being public or private, designated or informal/illegal/unauthorized. Removing features that exist is actually considered vandalism.

It's clear that these features still exist on the ground. Not being public access areas is an invalid reason to remove data from OSM. So this edit is incorrect and damaging to valid OSM data.

The correct way to handle this is to use OSM's tagging system. access=private, or access=no would be appropriate if they are closed to the public. Once this is done, services that do use OSM data will reflect that and specify their access.

Please read this for more info:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won't_delete_roads_on_private_property
LorenzoPesci (2026-07-10 07:15:30+00:00): come può una zona militare ospitare una baraccopoli? forse è una ex zona militare ora usata per cotruirci baracche?
Plaintelive (2026-07-10 07:44:32+00:00): La zona è un ex aeroporto, ormai abbandonato ma, come le numerose caserme abbandonate in tutta Italia, il suolo rimane di proprietà dell' esercito e come scritto nella wiki landuse:military si usa anche per le aree di proprietà dell' esercito.
LorenzoPesci (2026-07-10 11:10:46+00:00): nella pagina https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dmilitary non vedo "proprietà dell'esercito"
LorenzoPesci (2026-07-10 11:12:22+00:00): ricordo che in genere su osm si mappa lo stato reale, non la situazione formale
Plaintelive (2026-07-11 08:15:25+00:00): Lei ha ragione, ma io non conoscendo la zona (in questo changeset ho soltanto aggiunto qualche edificio) non me la sento di modificarlo. Grazie
itineris (2026-04-03 13:26:30+00:00): Szia!

1. Az óvoda-bölcsőde új épületének mi a forrása? A módosításcsomagban csak a FÖMI 2015-öt látom, amin viszont nem látható ez az épület. Mint ahogyan az összes többi OSM-ben elérhető légifelvétel rétegen sem.

2. Mivel ez az épület is az óvodához-bölcsődéhez tartozik, jó lenne ennek megfelelően building=* címkézni. (Esetleg az egyik épület csak óvoda, a másik csak bölcsőde.)

3. Az óvoda területét (amenity) is ki kellene terjeszteni erre a részre.
ssummoner1 (2026-04-03 13:41:59+00:00): Azt valóban elrontottam a leírásban. Nagyjából berajzoltam sacc-kb a fömin. Ez egy új épület. Kérsz róla fotót? A szomszéd faluban lakom.

https://dehir.hu/debrecen/kozel-hatvan-gyermeket-fogadhat-a-teglaskerti-reformatus-bolcsode/2024/10/31/

A többit megcsinálhatod, vagy szeretnéd, ha a területét is én terjesszem ki?
itineris (2026-04-03 13:55:05+00:00): Én elhiszem neked; még raktam is ide egy jegyzetet, hogy lett egy új épület: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4455071

A kép alapján az új épület lett a bölcsőde, és a régi maradt az óvoda. Akkor majd így címkézem.
A területet is megnövelem.
ssummoner1 (2026-04-04 17:52:36+00:00): Rendben
AndyB_66 (2025-11-20 20:44:26+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
george1201 (2025-11-15 23:16:59+00:00): Hallo Moepmoep,
du hast mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13299742421 einen neuen Speiseeisautomaten eingezeichnet. Der Automat stand bisher auf der anderen Straßenseite vor der Eisdiele. Da ist die Frage, wie man eine solche Ortsverschiebung mappt. Man kann einen neuen Knoten anlegen und den alten löschen. Oder man verschiebt den alten Knoten an die richtige Position. Bei diesem Vorgehen würde die Historie erhalten bleiben. Was besser ist, ist wohl Geschmacksache. Aktuell haben wir hier aber jetzt zwei Automaten in der Karte. Das ist einer zuviel. Es gibt zwei Lösungsmöglichkeiten: 
1. Den alten Knoten n11796135466 löschen und den neuen unverändert lassen.
2. Den neuen Knoten n13299742421 wieder löschen und den alten an die richtige Position verschieben.
Moepmoep (2025-11-16 16:15:01+00:00): Oha, das ist das Problem mit Streetcomplete, daß es Automaten nur anzeigt, wenn man in das Overlay "Dinge" wechselt.  Offensichtlich war der Ausschnitt zu klein, als daß ich das gesehen hätte.  Ich lösche den neuen Automaten und verschiebe den alten.  Danke für's Aufpassen!
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:41:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321469 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Ireland
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:42:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321535 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Norway
Marek-M (2025-11-13 13:24:35+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/291305307
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/296166090
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/331485813
+ inne obiekty dostały błędne tagowanie
```
wikimedia_commons=Category:	
wikipedia=pl:
```
WieKo68 (2025-11-13 17:20:01+00:00): Poprawiłem. Błąd poprawiony także w skrypcie generującym dane
felipeeugenio (2025-11-12 18:19:55+00:00): Hola. Layer=-1 es por si acaso el camino está en otro nivel que los caminos aledaños. Es así?
por favor estudiar los tags antes de agregarlos.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174564504
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:36:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
Jempo (2025-11-13 07:21:19+00:00): - Fixed typo in name "Obercorn" -> "Oberkorn"
- Update Busline Tice-14
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:36:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:37:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
Jordi MF (2025-11-12 15:20:36+00:00): Descripció errònia. Senzillament he millorat un poc la geometria.
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:36:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
Dimitar155 (2025-11-12 21:00:53+00:00): SC слага recycling:PET, което не е коректния таг за кофите за PET бутилки. Надявам се в следващата версия да е оправено.

https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete/issues/6608
Fraxi (2025-11-12 21:11:53+00:00): Готово
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174577977
Dimitar155 (2025-11-12 21:16:37+00:00): Благодаря!
Baloo Uriza (2025-12-04 14:23:06+00:00): There doesn't appear to even be tracks through the grass, much less something as major as highway=service looking at Bing and Esri aerials.  I'm curious where you're getting this from.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174565044
dvlpmnt (2025-12-04 20:56:03+00:00): its in the description: sentinel2 imagery
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:38:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
MatthieuMartin (2025-12-15 21:38:09+00:00): Bonjour N_KD, 
Il n'est pas nécessaire de préciser sur les trottoirs les tags d'accès suivants : bicycle=no
foot=yes
horse=no 
Par défaut en France  : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#France

Bonne carto!
Matthieu
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:35:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
pwbriggs (2025-11-12 19:28:20+00:00): Hey, thanks for adding your business. I see that there's a business already mapped at this address in unit 505. That business is Skyline Real Estate. Did Umano replace Skyline, or does it share the space and unit number?

Thanks!
UmanoPM (2025-11-12 21:33:27+00:00): We share the space and unit number. Thanks!
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:38:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
AurélienQ (2025-11-13 12:58:49+00:00): Hello, 

Merci d'attendre la fin d'une discussion avant de tout révoquer
Tristramg (2025-11-13 13:04:21+00:00): Zut, désolé si j’ai raté une discussion. Elle a lieu où pour que je sois au courant de ce qui se passe.