piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
gurglypipe (2025-12-04 14:54:01+00:00): Great. I’ve made the changes in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175498881

No worries, one of the great things about OSM is that things can always be changed again to improve them. If you could leave a bit more contextual info in your changeset descriptions, that would help avoid misunderstandings in future, but that’s a very minor suggestion from me. Thanks again for your work on the map :)
mcliquid (2025-12-03 17:57:43+00:00): Hello jekakyiv, thank you for your edits with Rapid!
A quick note: this edit set contains changes in areas that are very far apart – from Finland to Spain. Such large-scale changes can be difficult for other mappers to follow and make it much more complicated to review or undo individual edits.
For future edits, it would be helpful if you could:
- limit each changeset to a small, clearly defined area,
- upload your work in one region before continuing in another distant area,
- thus ensuring clear and easily verifiable local changesets.
You can find more information here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
Thank you for your attention—and good luck with your mapping!
OSM-Contributer (2025-12-03 14:45:53+00:00): Sorry, I added 4 chowk names not three
Kholiel Ghibran 87 PTL (2026-06-05 19:20:22+00:00): Peletakan lokasi nama panton luas itu salah, karena sebagian lokasi desa panton luas masuk ke kawasan desa lain, harap di ubah, karena referensi anda tidak real.
FajrAl (2026-06-06 11:51:00+00:00): Terima kasih @Kholiel Ghibran 87 PTL masukannya. Data ini memang dapat dipertanyakan.
marc__marc (2026-02-07 16:16:09+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1097102209
power=catenary_portal ne serrait-il pas une erreur pour décrire 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:power%3Dcatenary_mast ?
Cordialement,
Marc
AurélienQ (2026-02-08 09:46:17+00:00): Bonjour,
Sur l'imagerie aérienne on distingue bien que c'est ici un cadre fermé, et non juste des poteaux à coté de la voie. Le tag caternary_portal est donc bien approprié (sauf si l'imagerie n'est pas jour évidement).
marc__marc (2026-02-08 09:49:16+00:00): Merci pour ton retour. je me suis fait avoir par manque de doc en fr qui ne m'a pas renseigné power=catenary_portal comme un tag documenté
AurélienQ (2026-02-08 09:53:53+00:00): Pas de soucis ! C'est vrai que c'est parfois un peu compliqué...
marc__marc (2026-02-08 09:57:01+00:00): c'est le moteur de recherche du wiki qui devrait proposer d'autres langues quand cela n'existe pas dans la langue demandée :) un peu comme le fait iD
j'ai reporté l'erreur du signalement osmose https://github.com/open-energy-transition/validate-my-grid/issues/8
AurélienQ (2026-02-08 10:31:27+00:00): Bonne idée !
LudovicG (2025-12-07 18:24:01+00:00): Salut Yann,
Je pense que ton node est un doublon de celui là node/13302415440, antérieur de quelques jours.
Et je vois que la zone mériterait un coup de polish vu les travaux : le parking way/332873737 (et le chemin way/1209334857) empiete sur le bâtiment way/1442336302.
As-tu l'occasion d'y repasser ?
Yaaaaaaaa (2026-01-22 21:57:52+00:00): salut Ludovic, c'est fait :)
Marcel-NL (2025-12-15 12:56:48+00:00): Hoi Kees. Is utility niet alleen voor nutsbedrijven? Als ik op https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Autility%3Dchemical kijk, dan lijkt deze tag niet de bedoeling voor een "gewone" chemische fabriek.
keesm (2025-12-15 14:52:00+00:00): Hoi Marcel,
Ik was na een tijdje zoeken eerder ook op die wiki pagina uitgekomen. Hoewel Seqora geen groot bedrijf is is het naar mijn mening iets meer dan een “gewone” chemische fabriek, geen nutsbedrijf. Worden diverse producten gemaakt en staat hier lokaal ook bekend als een bedrijf met een hoog veiligheidsrisico. Periodiek discussie hier of dit bedrijf nog wel past op die plek. De omschrijving bij note op die wiki vond ik van toepassing op dit bedrijf (site Seqora: zie omschrijving bij Producten, hoogwaardige chemicaliën voor andere bedrijven/industrie). 
Maar het is ook maar een keuze na wat zoekwerk/afweging.
Mocht je een betere/passende tag weten: prima om aan te passen.
Gr
Kees
Baloo Uriza (2025-12-03 15:22:12+00:00): Is that loop of streets four different streets?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175451306
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-23 06:43:57+00:00): Cleaned up incorrect SEO and other tagging for POI in changeset 184461152

https://osm.org/changeset/184461152
Baloo Uriza (2025-12-03 18:22:38+00:00): This camera is still very into the intersection, what's it mounted on?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175451635
pallindo (2025-12-03 23:22:56+00:00): I swear the hatchery is the most detailed thing west river...  This is impressive
SD Mapman (2025-12-04 01:36:37+00:00): Thanks! Missing the plain dirt areas out by Mirror (no good tag) and I still haven't got around to doing the landuse out by Cox.
JakovRajić (2025-12-03 15:37:03+00:00): Removed truck restrictions from the middle the street and left only on both ends because there aren't any sings from smaller roads #OptimoRoute

osm.org/changeset/175452090
Frans S (2025-12-21 10:42:57+00:00): Thanks for mapping on this task.
A remark. You regularly just draw a rectangle over complex buildings with extensions, etc. Please map them more accurately, following the rooflines.
Best regards
rempshaener (2025-12-03 21:22:19+00:00): Hallo,

wie bereits zu https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172946319 geschrieben, bestehen Regeln für Importe.
Hier handelt es sich aus meiner Sicht um einen derartigen Import.
Erkennbar an den Importartefakten _waypoint_=yes und am Dublettenhandling. Dubletten: hier www.openstreetmap.org/node/13351528647 und hier www.openstreetmap.org/node/5648217713 kommt es zu unerwünschten Doppelungen. Und an weiteren Stellen.
Meines Erachtens ist dein Import ein Anwärter für einen Revert.
Ich möchte dich bitten,
- die fehlerhaften _waypoint_=yes zu entfernen und
- umgehend die Dubletten aufzuklären.

Viele Grüße
DD1GJ (2025-12-04 07:46:03+00:00): Hallo Elischer,
abgesehen von dem bereits erwähnten falschen Tag und keinerlei Berücksichtigen der bei OSM bereits vorhandenen Hydranten, ist die Datenqualität ziemlich schlecht. In der Draisstaße hast Du Unterflur eingetragen, obwohl es Überflur sind. Ein Beispiel wäre https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1918226503

Zudem haben die Unterflur auf den Hydrantenschildern Referenznummern und es fehlen Angaben über den Leitungsdurchmesser und Lage (Fahrban/Gehweg/Grünfläche).

In wessen Auftrag hast Du die Daten Pmportiert? Ist der Wasserversorger damit einverstanden (Urheberrecht)?
DD1GJ (2025-12-04 07:50:38+00:00): Wenn Du für eine Firma arbeitest, erwartet die Community Transparenz im Rahmen von https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Organised_Editing_Guidelines

Zur Vermeidung von Datenbank-Konflikten habe ich Deinen unsachgemäßen Import rückgängig gemacht.
MarkoŠatrak (2025-12-04 11:44:07+00:00): Reverting because the whole street should have been tagged with truck restrictions #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175487886
t_ja (2025-12-04 16:31:40+00:00): Ahoj,
system integrovanej dopravy bol uz davnejsie premenovany na "IDS Plus", nakolko sa rozsiril aj na uzemie Trencianskeho kraja. Preto prosim oprav svoje premenovanie na stary nazov, kedze "IDS Plus" je spravna hodnota.

T.
Frans S (2025-12-08 13:37:14+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
 * Please map individual buildings without collecting multiple nearby buildings into a single object.
 * Please accurately outline all buildings.
 * Buildings should be mapped without snapping their corners to other buildings and features such as roads and paths.
 * Buildings should have their corners squared.
Best regards
Farras (2025-12-04 17:39:19+00:00): Mas, tolong bersihkan dulu impor barunya. Ini banyak nama ajaib kayak "Unknown Point Feature" (n13351573244), "Kantor Geuchik/Kepala Desa..." (n13351573282), "Rumah/Kantor Dusun..." (n13351573271), "Kantor Sekretariat..." (n13351573289), "Rumah dan..." (n13351573274) "Perumahan Perkebunan" (n13351506917), dll dsb. Terima kasih.
w_djatmiko (2025-12-08 00:31:16+00:00): Ok siap
w_djatmiko (2025-12-08 00:35:10+00:00): Minta tolong dibantu langsung di edit saja
eggie (2025-12-03 16:16:45+00:00): Dag number Ik zie dat je pdok latest gebruikt. Daar kun je zien hoe het voetpad loopt? Nu loopt het door de tuinen.
Wellicht heb je een versie met veel bomen? 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-12-03 20:03:57+00:00): voetpad opnieuw uitgelijnd.
number975312468 (2025-12-03 21:07:49+00:00): thanks, correct now yes
TinPetreković (2025-12-03 16:04:58+00:00): The node that was accidentally created has been removed in changeset 175453288 since it served no real purpose.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175453288
Gerhard24 (2025-12-03 16:04:53+00:00): Deleted: Überschüssige Sitzbank, Mülleimer.
Frans S (2026-01-02 12:48:26+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please square each building with the Q key while still stelected.
Best regards
MxxCon (2025-12-04 20:37:47+00:00): Hello.
In this edit you also dragged intersection node a few houses over. I fixed this.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175453704
Sara1000 (2025-12-03 16:24:21+00:00): يوجد في هذا المكان فعلا نقطة تمركز للشرطه
pitscheplatsch (2025-12-03 16:35:54+00:00): Hallo,

dann bitte mit den korrekten Tags mappen und nicht mit historical-Tags versehen. Dies kann z.B. mit auch mit Organicmaps gemacht werden. Es muss dann nicht noch zusätzlich ein OSM Hinweis erstellt werden. Dies wurde Dir aber bereits mehrfach mitgeteilt.

Danke und viele Grüße, 
Pascal
Sara1000 (2025-12-03 16:44:07+00:00): هذه المساهمه توضيحيه اكثر فى OSM
خاصة أن هذه المنطقه حيويه لقائدي السيارات والدراجات الناريه 
لذالك اري ان من الضروري ان يتم توضيح المساهمه للعامه خاصة ان مستخدمين خريطة الشارع اغلبهم من سائقى الدراجات الناريه 
وهذه المساهمه على بعد خطوات من مبني مديرية امن القاهره الجديده 
وشكرا على اهتمام حضرتك جدا بالتفاصيل الدقيقه
eggie (2025-12-03 16:33:05+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback   
Alle begin is moeilijk. 
Het is niet gebruikelijk om een name= te gebruiken voor een functie. Dan kun je beter description gebruiken.
Het is niet de naam van het gebouwtje.
Verder vraag ik me af of een voedselveldje een leisure=park is?

Wellicht beter natural=scrun gebruiken en voor name=description gebruiken. Het zal vast geen officieel uitgegeven naam zijn. 

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-12-03 16:55:30+00:00): park omgezet naar natural=scrub en een description
LordGarySugar (2025-12-19 03:23:12+00:00): I've partially reverted this changeset in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176120320 - why did you delete 100 parking spaces from the car park?
Comino (2025-12-03 17:02:37+00:00): You forgot the name tag.
:-)
willkmis (2025-12-04 00:25:20+00:00): Please also don't reabbreviate addresses, they should be fully spelled out like they were before (K Street Northwest, not K St NW)
saunter (2025-12-07 20:57:19+00:00): Thanks, I fixed those issues

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175639988
NorthCrab_upload (2025-12-04 00:56:51+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1159693797

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eggie (2025-12-03 16:35:01+00:00): De naam Krombeemden staat al op de kaart.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-12-03 16:36:57+00:00): Ik heb de naam weer verwijderd. Kijk even goed op de kaart. Het staat toch al aangegeven?
MVG
eggie
b-jazz (2025-12-04 21:58:32+00:00): Hi Benny,

We've discussed this with you several times in the past. You are deleting valid map objects that belong to relations and are recreating the objects (fairways typically) from scratch leaving broken multipolygon definitions around.

If you continue to do this, I, and possibly others, will start reverting your hard work. Please make sure you edit existing fairways in place and stop breaking multipolygons.

If you don't understand any of this, you can find more information about multipolygons and relations at the wiki. If you still don't understand, please reach out with questions and we'll gladly help you map correctly so that the community doesn't have to clean up errors.

Thanks.
felipeeugenio (2025-12-03 18:15:08+00:00): Hola. por favor no agregar información privada.
Saludos
foreigner037 (2025-12-07 10:26:11+00:00): Hi, what is the intent behind marking these roads as *_link? This is not accepted practice in Bulgaria.
foreigner037 (2025-12-07 10:27:02+00:00): Ooops, ignore my previous comment. The map wasn't yet updated for me.
VLD157 (2025-12-04 16:42:25+00:00): Hello KelsonV, 

At the intersection of Clark Lane and Phelan Lane, you added crossing:island=yes to a few of the crossing way segments, which conflicts with the ‘no’ value you had previously added to the nodes. It seems like this may have been accidental, so I wanted to let you know just in case. 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1452454240 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1452454241 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1452454239 

Best Regards, 
VLD157 / Callista
KelsonV (2025-12-04 17:53:31+00:00): Thanks for catching that! I must have just clicked the wrong number of times.

Yeah, none of the residential/residential intersections in the grid between 190th and Robinson and between Aviation and Inglewood has islands, just some of the bigger streets and diagonals.

I'll go fix that one now!
chris66 (2026-02-19 18:39:19+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13351691868

Ich glaube, die PLZ ist falsch.
skorpion62 (2026-02-19 20:20:46+00:00): Hallo chris66,
alle Betriebe an der Badberger Straße haben die Postanschrift mit dieser Postleitzahl 49610.
Ich war damals vor Ort und habe mir eine Visitenkarte mit genommen mit genau dieser Adresse.
Viele Grüße 
skorpion62
chris66 (2026-02-20 08:41:51+00:00): ok, hatte mich gewundert, dass auf der Webseite eine andere PLZ angegeben ist.
VG.
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:37:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
trial (2025-12-03 20:24:27+00:00): Je t'offre le subject:wikidata : Q137200755
lann (2025-12-03 21:24:00+00:00): Rajouté.
J'ai la photo du buste si tu veux : https://api.panoramax.xyz/?focus=pic&map=17.48/47.748088/-3.367977&pic=ec3b1177-c00f-47cf-8833-0ca389badc14&speed=250&xyz=303.60/18.53/30
trial (2025-12-03 23:29:49+00:00): Tu peux le mettre en lien panoramax 
Et pour son histoire : https://patrimoine.lorient.bzh/histoire/personnalites/c/cuissard-caroline
trial (2025-12-03 23:31:42+00:00): panoramax=ec3b1177-c00f-47cf-8833-0ca389badc14 sauf erreur
NieWnen (2025-12-05 18:31:10+00:00): Jak już poprawiasz te `landuse=farmland` to warto jednak dodawać te `landuse=residential`/`landuse=farmyard` w miejscu tych budynków, bo takie przesuwanie by zostawić pustą plamę raczej jest średnio sensowne.
No i zachęcam przy okazji, żeby dzielić też wzdłuż dróg, że po drogach również nie przebiegał `landuse=farmland`.
JoZoB (2025-12-15 08:30:43+00:00): Bonjour, le "chemin" 1455821745 est sur un terrain entièrement PRIVÉ. J'essais de le faire retirer de strava depuis des mois, et il est bien indiqué sur la carte que le terrain est privé.
Jean-Baptiste Le Coz (2025-12-15 09:26:48+00:00): Je me sers de la heatmap pour tracer les chemins. Si un chemin apparaît sur la heatmap, c'est qu'il y a du passage dessus. À mon avis strava ne peut pas retirer un chemin de la heatmap vu que la heatmap n'est pas une cartographie mais une trace du passage des utilisateurs. Personnellement, je ne pense pas que retirer le chemin de OSM soit la solution. Il vaut mieux le taggé privé (et il apparaitra privé sur les gps) ou faire en sorte que le chemin ne soit pas accessible. En tout cas je ne voulais pas vous causer du tort.
JoZoB (2025-12-15 11:34:06+00:00): sur strava il y a un Segment qui a été cree en dehors de la heatmap, c'est un calvaire parce qu emalgre les panneaux et grillages qu'il y a pu avoir avant destruction toujours autant de monde passe. J'ai deja encadre tout le terrain, où le dit chemin etait tracé, comme etant un terrain prive interdite a toute personne non autorisée..
je me doute bien que vous n'etes pas a l'origine du probleme, si vous avez des idées pour m'aider a baliser l'endroit sur OSM je suis preneur, je debute sur OSM
j'ai fait supprimé les trace sur Gmap et c'etait une  longue bataille..
Jean-Baptiste Le Coz (2025-12-15 16:54:05+00:00): Sur OSM, il est possible de marquer l'accès comme privé dans les attribut du chemin. Normalement les applis de routages automatiques doivent tenir compte et certaine carto doivent l'afficher comme non praticable. Après si certain sont prêt à passer outre grillage et panneau, ce n'est pas ça qui va les arrêter. En tant que vttiste je déplore ce manque de respect qui n'aide pas à la pratique de notre sport sur le long terme en bonne intelligence avec tout le monde. Je vous signale aussi qu'il y a 2 segments sur strava pour ce chemin (un en vtt et un en course à pied).
JoZoB (2025-12-15 17:48:49+00:00): wow merci je n'avais pas vu l'autre segment en VTT, je vais faire le signalement egalement, sur strava c'est les particuliers qui font le tracer des segments il me semble non ? pa ssur que pour strava cela rectifie la chose. Cependant j'ai quand meme fait toute une zone en integrant l'attribut private la ou se trouve le chemin, il devrait etre prit en compte non ?
NorthCrab_upload (2025-12-04 00:56:39+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2607316695
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/103526318

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
TrickyFoxy (2026-01-01 21:07:04+00:00): 👋 Не вносите личные заметки в OpenStreetMap. Используйте раздел Метки в приложении
Glassman (2025-12-04 20:10:35+00:00): #TIP: the addr=* is not needed since the building is tagged with an address. Router will take you to the closes way to the address.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175457938
Roydon Olive (2025-12-04 12:08:45+00:00): Your changeset message is false: you changed some roads from service roads to residential roads.
NieWnen (2025-12-04 00:44:23+00:00): Dzięki za wykrycie i korektę.
Dorzuciłem też do innej relacji.

Z ciekawości, losowo na to trafiłeś, czy w jakiś inny sposób to wykryłeś?
Javnik (2025-12-04 13:54:39+00:00): Np, bawię się lokalnie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Quality_assurance#subway-preprocessor. Wykryło też na tej wariantowej relacji, którą poprawiłeś. Nie poprawiałem tamtego, bo na szybko nie widziałem tego w rozkładzie, więc wolałem zostawić jak jest ;)
user_5359 (2025-12-04 14:30:18+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1451568117. What is the mean of the tag 0 = 120?
Glassman (2025-12-04 20:11:54+00:00): #TIP: the node with tag barrier= is not needed since you added the fence way
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175458193
rumixist (2025-12-03 18:26:24+00:00): Koşu pistini hem alan olarak hem de yol olarak çizmiştim bu yüzden hata veriyordu. Bu sorunu çözmek için yol olarak çizdiğim şeydeki bazı etiketleri değiştirdim ama bu sefer de çizgi olarak gözüküyor. Şu an da galiba hatalı oldu bunu nasıl düzeltebilirim?
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-23 06:39:11+00:00): Reverted adding a building inside a building with SEO POI tags in changeset 184460987

https://osm.org/changeset/184460987
dmjab13 (2025-12-04 13:32:47+00:00): please keep changesets like this to a single state or region
u2IdbX51OyQ8NLmRN3niHFs5rGDy6x1ge1e2l69B8RnhdhNgy (2025-12-04 13:35:52+00:00): my bad. edits were made in CoMaps App and doesn't allow control on how many of the changes upload at a time. I'll try to space them out more and see if it helps
jbcharron (2025-12-06 11:22:25+00:00): Hello,
Merci pour tes contributions dans les Vosges
Il y a quelques années des contributions ont ajoutés des noms de chemins "Voie de {commmune} à {une autre commune}", ces noms sont issues du cadastre mais ne correspond a rien sur le terrain, ni dans les bases d'adresses des communes.
N'hésite pas à les retirer, si tu en croises de nouveau
Bonne journée
MarcoR (2025-12-03 20:08:26+00:00): Benvenuto su OSM Marco!

La tua modifica non mi sembra abbia problemi.

All'inizio ti consiglio di aggiungere/modificare nodi separati come panchine, indirizzi, ristoranti, etc. però sentiti libero di agire come meglio credi.

Buon mapping,
Marco.
Glassman (2025-12-04 20:14:36+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175459622
user_21381498 (2025-12-03 19:02:33+00:00): WTF
Gregory Peony (2025-12-03 19:50:45+00:00): Hi, nice to see you mapping again.

The suqare buildings look valid to me, though they are slightly oversized. Consider that you are looking at roofs but mapping footprints. Mapping slightly smaller than the roof tends to be more accurate.

I can tell that you are carefully scanning the imagery, which I really appreciate, but the circular footprints you mapped do not represent buildings; rather piles of (most likely) building materials. Contrary to the instructions for this project ESRI is more recent in this area and you can see some of the built buildings in it. Such piles of material are common at construction sites, it may help your interpretation if you saw one from the ground level or an oblique angle, perhaps even go and see one for yourself.

Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175460003
NorthCrab_upload (2025-12-04 00:56:49+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1100896743

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
oba510 (2025-12-04 09:27:45+00:00): Hi, thank you for your effort to map cycling infrastructure.  Unfortunately, (or more like fortunately, in this case) these protected bikeways/cycle tracks were already mapped. I would suggest taking a look at the "CyclOSM" layer under "Map Layers" on the right side of the OpenStreetMap website to get a better idea of what's already been done. Bike lanes/etc are typically tagged as part of the roadway (especially in situations such as on Bancroft where the separation is mostly paint and parked cars and bikes can filter between lanes) and don't necessarily show up on the standard layer.  You might also want to take a look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle if you haven't already.

ps, there have been a few accounts active recently that appear to be affiliated with bikestreets.com. If you're working for/with them you should read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing and/or https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines or forward it to whoever is in charge of your project.
varnish-WIDELY-downy (2025-12-12 16:19:22+00:00): Hey, @oba510, thanks for calling this out. We'll use https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities/Bike_Streets as the organized editing page for everyone involved in our organization from this point forward. Apologies for not having it before now.