piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
YomanNH (2025-04-08 10:56:04+00:00): Cześć,
po co robisz takie falujące granice obszarów landuse=residential? Niepotrzebnie łączysz je z trawnikami, a potem dodajesz nagle jakieś dziwne punkty, żeby wygiąć granicę na środku trawnika. Chodzi np. o takie punkty: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12724158301 i https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12724158302. Obszary landuse=residential najlepiej rysować nie łącząc ich z trawnikami, a szczególnie nie wolno łączyć ich z chodnikami i drogami, chociaż tego na szczęście nie robisz.
grzegorz75jan (2025-04-08 11:41:43+00:00): Klaustrofobicznie. Trochę ciasno tam dla mnie. 
Faktycznie ciekawe formy artystyczne tych obszarów.
Yoman nie wiem czy ci przystanku nie zdemolował https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1344653367

arrhurr łap na święta i nie grzesz więcej
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLTgtPjgzssHzsgAqYbi2QfRoRk1S9ioX5

https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/pl/40
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=info.zverev.ilya.every_door&hl=pl

https://play.google.com/store/search?q=streetcomplete&c=apps&hl=pl
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164436451
YomanNH (2025-04-08 11:49:55+00:00): No oczywiście, że usunął wiatę przystankową... Dzięki Grzegorz, że zauważyłeś. Trzeba będzie mieć oko na tego użytkownika.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-06-16 15:17:29+00:00): wysłałem W z błaganiem o przeczytanie
felipeeugenio (2025-04-02 19:46:03+00:00): Hola. por favor revisar el correo que le envié con algunos datos. por favor no agregar información privada. Esto no es un ambiente de pruebas.
saludos
NeisReview (2025-04-02 19:56:05+00:00): #NameCheck

Hello and welcome to OSM.

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits, particularly those concerning the names you've added or modified.

Some of these names caught my attention as they are quite unique or a bit unusual. Could you please confirm if these additions were intentional or if they might have been added mistakenly?

Looking forward to your response.

Thank you!
Udarian (2025-04-03 05:11:55+00:00): All three of this contributors commits seem shifty, all of the websites they link aren't up at this point in time and using the wayback machine they look very shifty and do not seem to be selling what the tags on these objects make it seem as if they are. Allot of the names of businesses are seemingly from video games and the new businesses added as areas have very suspicious geometry, aka a building in the middle what is in reality inside of a sidewalk area.
GPYes (2025-04-02 20:01:17+00:00): Correction: Source used was Maxar satellite imagery via MGP Pro 2025-03-16
MxxCon (2025-04-03 16:14:38+00:00): Hello.
Please note that "train" is just a colloquial term us local use. However, the proper term is "subway", and that information is already tagged on this station.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164437904
Allison P (2025-04-02 23:37:21+00:00): I somehow managed to create a way with zero nodes that I had no way of deleting in iD, so I had to download the osc and remove it manually. I couldn't find a way to import the osc into iD, so I uploaded with JOSM.
MxxCon (2025-04-03 16:25:16+00:00): Is Parkville a proper neighborhood like all the other or is this is a designated historical neighborhood?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164438863
SiennaShade (2025-04-03 18:32:51+00:00): No, it's not a designated historical district, but it's not exactly a proper neighborhood either. It's an old name for this area which is nowadays usually considered to be part of the nearby Kensington neighborhood.

More info here: 
https://www.cityneighborhoods.nyc/parkville
https://www.bklynlibrary.org/blog/2015/02/18/whats-parkville

I mostly intended to just move the imported node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/158851236 to the correct location.
YomanNH (2025-04-08 12:21:22+00:00): Widzę, że poprzesuwałeś obiekty dopasowując je do podkładu Bing. Jest on niestety przesunięty względem rzeczywistości. Jeśli chcesz z niego korzystać, to najpierw musisz skorzystać z opcji "Przesunięcie warstwy tła". Przywróciłem prawidłową geometrię.
grzegorz75jan (2025-04-08 14:41:31+00:00): To jednak będzie co pilnować
YomanNH (2025-04-08 14:59:21+00:00): Ten użytkownik wygląda jak nowe wcielenie tego ciężkiego przypadku: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/bzzzkrk/history
Obszar działania i jakość mapowania są podobne.
grzegorz75jan (2025-04-08 15:13:21+00:00): Może się przepoczwarzył.

Gdy w edycjach szczególnie nowych kont widzę obszary a zielone to wybitnie oraz dużo czerwonego po usuwaniu to mam  Red alert. Brak odzewu już tylko stawia kropkę nad i
SomeoneElse (2025-04-03 13:12:45+00:00): Hello, I think that this change might have caused a problem with a few relations.  I've mentioned it on the forum at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/relation-breakage-on-the-coastline-northeast-of-swords/128284 .
To be clear, this absolutely isn't your fault - the problem is (a) the complicated way that relations are mapped here and (b) the way that the OSM editors don't notice that relations now have problems.
Best Regards,
Andy
Thosewhoknow (2025-04-03 22:26:30+00:00): I made an attempt to fix a few of them just now, and I’ll do more tomorrow. Sorry for that!
SomeoneElse (2025-04-05 17:38:23+00:00): Thanks!
Thosewhoknow (2025-04-06 18:29:06+00:00): I think I’ve fixed all the issues now, or at least most of them.
SomeoneElse (2025-04-12 14:37:15+00:00): I think everything that was expected to reappear did, thanks.
SiennaShade (2025-04-03 01:03:17+00:00): Reverted in https://osm.org/changeset/164443658
Bobropiton (2025-04-13 08:43:55+00:00): А зачем было отдельный вей городить для сьездов с внутреннего кольца? Там сплошной нет. Ничего не мешает почти до самого конца с любой из полос уйти на сьезды. Так что вей убран, сьезды приведены к изначальному состоянию.
SiennaShade (2025-04-03 00:53:38+00:00): Why did you delete the driveways?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164439667
NeisReview (2025-04-03 04:54:56+00:00): #DeletionsCheck

Hi, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed many of your changes in this set involve deletions.

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.
SiennaShade (2025-04-03 18:36:35+00:00): Reverted.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-04-02 21:10:56+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3008659787

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
FirefighterCGH (2025-10-13 09:10:00+00:00): Auf welcher Grundlage wurde das getaggt?
David Jazbec (2025-10-13 09:20:50+00:00): Da es sich um ein Waldruh handelt, glaube ich das man den "Pavilion" als place of worship taggen kann.
FirefighterCGH (2025-10-13 11:23:24+00:00): Ja, das stimmt, allerdings scheint es ein „neutraler/nicht religiöser Friedhof“ zu sein, ich habe religion=no gesetzt, place of worship passt
SiennaShade (2025-04-03 00:54:23+00:00): Why did you delete all those driveways?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164439896
NeisReview (2025-04-03 04:54:21+00:00): #DeletionsCheck

Hi, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed many of your changes in this set involve deletions.

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.
SiennaShade (2025-04-03 18:36:56+00:00): Reverted.
chris66 (2026-02-22 16:40:08+00:00): Existiert laut Note nicht (mehr).
ChrissW-R1 (2026-02-23 09:17:08+00:00): Siehe Diskussion in Note: https://osm.org/note/5158576
ChrissW-R1 (2026-02-23 09:18:34+00:00): Sorry, falscher Note. Hier der richtige: https://osm.org/note/5158524
voteforpedro (2025-05-28 00:13:43+00:00): Just hiked across Gambier (Cha7élkwnech) and want to thank you, because the trails on here were so accurate, was VERY useful in route finding over some of the less defined trails! I too use the Strava heatmap for remote trail accuracy, so cool to see someone else using it too!

Cheers!
eerib (2025-05-28 05:46:44+00:00): Thank you for the kind words!

Once I get ahold of some good quality lidar for the island I'll be able to do a ton more improvements. Just waiting on the Province or Islands Trust to acquire that data.
Allison P (2025-04-03 04:23:47+00:00): Google is neither allowable nor serviceable as a source.
GA_Kevin (2025-04-03 02:20:43+00:00): Hi MrMagic7,

I live in the bordering Bluepool community, and drive by this location everyday, it has been there for months, and should be captured in OSM. The brick-and-mortar location is further up on Bemiss. Can you please restore this node? Thanks!

-- GA_Kevin
MrMagic7 (2025-04-10 20:44:43+00:00): That node was for a food truck which is not there everyday. I've drive by when it has been gone. Should we have points for places that are mobile?
GA_Kevin (2025-04-11 15:43:29+00:00): It's a good question. I havent seen it move but if you have maybe best to ask the forum for guidance. Seems to me like useful info (ive eaten there - its okay)
silversurfer83 (2025-05-25 21:41:57+00:00): Hi :)

This 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:street_vendor%3Dyes
Lists food trucks as an example.

MrMagic7, please don't delete food truck locations. Thank you.

If there are questions, please see the wiki, visit c.osm.org or maybe slack

Happy mapping
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-26 01:08:19+00:00): food truck that is not there 100% of the time, but typically is there is mappable, so I will readd it

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166755859
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-26 01:10:04+00:00): See also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/removal-of-a-permanent-food-truck/130564
NeisBot (2025-04-02 21:48:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2025-04-06 18:08:28+00:00): Thanks for your correction.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164440892
wambag (2025-04-02 22:11:35+00:00): Justification for extending I 10 eastbound, and why the southernmost roadway: 1) the mainline clearly continues to the right at the split over the RR tracks; 2) two more exits signed on I 10 east actually exit from the southernmost roadway, with the last exit reachable from I 10 (and not I 95) for Forest St; 3) signs on Stockton St indicate the onramp to this roadway is for I 10 East / To I 95
GA_Kevin (2025-04-03 02:22:57+00:00): Hi MrMagic7,

Is this open yet? If so, we can mark it as no longer under construction. I just havent driven down Ashley in the past week to see myself. Same with the new Wawa on northside.

-- GA_Kevin
MrMagic7 (2025-04-10 20:01:53+00:00): Yes it is open. But, the Wawa won't be open until the end of June I've heard.
GA_Kevin (2025-04-11 15:44:45+00:00): Good news! I heard they were hiring, and yes I went in this Zaxby's the other day - Thanks for updating!
NeisBot (2025-04-02 22:01:34+00:00): Hi Ben Stillss, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 95% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 3 highway(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=164441145
woodpeck (2025-04-02 22:10:52+00:00): I am reverting this edit. The map is not "messed up" - someone has mapped driveways and sidewalks which can make the map look busy but it's certainly not unusual. Before you go about deleting things you don't like, please seek a consensus on the relevant forum on community.openstreetmap.org.
NeisReview (2025-04-04 05:34:19+00:00): Thank you for your private message and confirming that your deletions were intentional.

However, as already mentioned, your changeset has been reverted.
literan (2025-04-03 20:07:10+00:00): корректные теги для сервиса по ремонту электроники:
craft=electronics_repair
electronics_repair=computer

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:craft=electronics_repair
anastasia_ (2025-04-07 23:32:42+00:00): Спасибо большое!
eggie (2025-04-03 09:39:49+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
NeisReview (2025-04-03 05:05:31+00:00): #UnexplainedChanges

Hello, welcome to OSM.

Could you please clarify the purpose behind your map changes? It's not entirely clear from the edited data and your added description. Also, what was used as a source of your activity?

Looking forward to your response. 
Thank you.
NeisReview (2025-04-03 04:59:21+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164442114
kaleidoscopica (2025-04-03 13:18:25+00:00): Hello! I am a mapper in Texas and I come across your work frequently lately. I want to ask if you have ever considered mapping streams so that they connect to the subsequent streams they flow out through? 

I find a visualization like this, WaterwayMap, to be helpful: https://waterwaymap.org/#map=8.42/30.311/-103.313&tiles=planet-waterway-water (you can zoom in and out to see what I mean - streams that connect are colored the same)

I have been on a large project to connect all the streams of Texas to their outflows - most eventually end up at the ocean, though a few turn into salt lakes or similar. 

When you add streams, I often come across them the next day as needing to be connected (they show up a different color). I wonder if I could ask you to do that work for me instead by always mapping streams in a way that connects... kind of like roads :)
NeisBot (2025-04-03 04:04:51+00:00): Hi Darkie Chan, and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

Over the past 7 days, you've made more than 100 changesets without adding any comment.

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good changeset comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments.

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment
rainerU (2025-05-05 12:48:59+00:00): Hallo ndim,
du hast mit diesem Änderungssatz einige Wege in die Relation  https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16801281 (RadNETZ Calw - Stuttgart-Feuerbach) aufgenommen, z.B. diesen hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1365811277

Bei der Relation handelt es sich um eine Superroute. Diese sollte nur Relationen und keine einzelnen Objekte enthalten. Wenn die betroffenen Wege Teil des RadNETZ sind, dann sollte dafür eine einfache Routenrelation angelegt werden, die dann ihrerseits in die Superroutenrelation aufgenommen werden kann.

Grüße
rainerU
ndim (2025-05-05 21:03:50+00:00): Vielen Dank für die Erläuterung.

Leider konnte ich bisher im Webeditor nur irgendeine halbwegs passende Relation aussuchen, und nicht gezielt eine bestimmte. Und wie ich gezielt eine passende Relation suchen und evtl neu anlegen kann, habe ich auch noch nicht herausgefunden.

Ursprünglich wollte ich ja auch gar nichts mit Relationen machen, sondern nur den neu gebauten Kreisverkehr anstelle der alten Kreuzung einbauen.

Die Relationen kamen mir dann nur in den Weg, und plötzlich schien es möglich, da passende Relationen zu verwenden, und das waren jetzt wohl die falschen.

Falls ich irgendwo ein User Interface zu Relationen finde, wo ich gezielt Relationen finden, aussuchen und bearbeiten kann, werde ich das in Ordnung bringen. Ansonsten gibts hier halt etwas länger nicht ganz hundertprozentige Daten.
ndim (2025-05-05 21:11:16+00:00): Soll diese superroute-Relation eigentlich ausschließlich aus Relationen bestehen, welche sämtliche Ways von einem Wegweiser bis zum nächsten Wegweiser umfasst?
ndim (2025-05-05 21:14:46+00:00): OK, vermutlich sollten diese Straßenteile eigentlich Teil der Relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8313290 sein. Mal schauen, ob herausfinde, wie das geht.
ndim (2025-05-05 21:18:09+00:00): Ah, man kann da einfach "8313290" eintippen. Nicht sehr intuitive Bedienung.
ndim (2025-05-05 21:22:59+00:00): OK, ich habe das Zeug jetzt aus der Superrelation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16801281 entfernt und in die Relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8313290 reingetan. Damit ist die Superrelation jetzt vermutlich sauber, aber ob und wie ich die 8313290 jetzt wegen dem Wegweise aufspalten soll... das sollte vielleicht jemand machen, der sich damit auskennt.
ndim (2025-05-06 01:00:28+00:00): Ich sollte dann wohl auch sicherheitshalber nochmal nachschauen, ob ich ähnliche Fehler auch mit den anderen Relationen gemacht habe (Kreisstraße, Buslinie, Fahrradroute Kreis CW)
rainerU (2025-05-06 07:02:22+00:00): Danke für deine schnelle Reaktion. Auf den ersten Blick sieht das gut aus. Die Radrouten in dieser Gegend wurden meines Wissens vom User https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Karthoo angelegt und werden von ihm auch gepflegt. Ich habe ihn auf diesen CS aufmerksam gemscht. Er wird da sicher auch noch einen Blick darauf werden.
Karthoo (2025-05-08 09:43:29+00:00): Habe es mir mal angeschaut und die Routen-Relationen noch etwas angepasst. Jetzt passts. Danke fürs aufmerksam machen!
ndim (2025-05-11 19:15:46+00:00): Danke fürs kompetente Eingreifen. Ich versuche, daraus zu lernen.
Boris Verkhovskiy (2025-04-09 23:48:02+00:00): I undeleted the driveway. It's illegal but it exists, I've driven it.
alester (2025-04-10 17:49:56+00:00): Okay, I looked for it as I drove by, but couldn't see anything but bush there. It's odd that nothing seems to be visible there on aerial imagery either, but maybe that's due to shadows. There was definitely a driveway a few hundred feet farther north. If you have local knowledge that it exists here, then I'm fine with it staying.
Boris Verkhovskiy (2025-04-10 18:50:24+00:00): That sounds like it may've been it. I drew it poorly, it does curve north.
Tolhuis (2025-04-05 20:07:42+00:00): Hallo, kunt u erop letten dat de geïmporteerde huizen dezelfde straatnaam in het adres krijgen als de naam van de straat?
In de Burgemeester Edmond Ronsestraat hebben de huizen een afgekorte straatnaam in hun adres.
mvg
nielsdg (2025-04-14 09:43:59+00:00): Bedankt om het op te merken! Met de laatste GRB-import heb ik dat meteen proberen op te lossen :-)
NeisReview (2025-04-03 05:19:29+00:00): #NodeDragging

Hello, and welcome to OSM.

Thank you for contributing to the map. I’ve reviewed your recent edits and noticed that at least one node of a way was moved. This can sometimes happen unintentionally, and it’s led to some unusual intersections or overlaps between street segments and other map elements.

Could you kindly confirm whether these changes were intentional or if they may have been made by mistake?

Thank you, and I look forward to your response!
NeisReview (2025-04-03 05:19:54+00:00): Thanks for your own revert/correction https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164443935
zeltwood (2025-04-03 00:09:19+00:00): I was having issues with Imagery so I will be updating tags on the website
olo81 (2025-06-28 16:11:38+00:00): Pod mostem nie ma ścieżki rowerowej :x 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/707381039 
Po remoncie dopiero będzie. 
Sam interweniowałem, by zmienili oznakowanie.
IreuN (2025-07-01 11:18:46+00:00): Poprawiłem, dzięki.

Błąd wynikał z tego, że poprawiałem drogi które mają 'sergregated' ale brak reszty tagów, tutaj dorobiem tagi od DDRiP ;)
NeisReview (2025-04-03 05:03:13+00:00): #NoTags

Hi, welcome to OSM.

I've reviewed your latest map edits and it seems that this changeset you created includes nodes and ways without any tags. Could there have been an issue during the mapping process?

Looking forward to your response.

Thank you!
b-jazz (2025-04-05 04:17:50+00:00): Can you explain this a little more. There is nothing wrong with fairways "overlapping" greens when they are properly defined with  multipolygon relations. There is a fringe around the green and that is typically mapped the way I had had mapped it. It would be nice if you didn't undo all of my hard work. Maybe I'm missing something.
runty_healer69 (2025-04-05 17:54:36+00:00): I am using a developer tool that has issues with importing the multipolygon area type. I believe I've got the issue sorted now so ill revert it back to multipolygon
Sanniu (2026-02-25 07:38:44+00:00): Hi, I can't find the היצירה street there, can you mark it as you familiar with the place?
BlumleinPear (2025-04-06 05:34:45+00:00): You have incorrectly tagged footpaths as  layer: - 1.  This indicates it is below the surface.  The building it is interfering with need either adjusting its footprint alignment, tagging it as higher or adding a roof for that part.
Pennnnnnnnnnnn (2025-04-06 07:27:28+00:00): ah, thanks for letting me know.

It looks like you've fixed some of them, but I'll go through and look for others next time I edit.
Baloo Uriza (2025-04-03 01:43:11+00:00): Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:branch

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164444100
rempshaener (2025-04-03 18:42:53+00:00): Hallo,

du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Aus meiner persönlichen Sicht heraus finde ich deine Anpassungen nicht unproblematisch. Was mir auffällt:
- Der Änderungssatz ist zu groß. Darunter leidet die Übersichtlichkeit und Nachprüfbarkeit.
- Der Kommentar zum Änderungssatz ist irreführend. Bei den Anpassungen handelt es sich nicht pauschal um die Verbesserung verschiedener kleinerer „Fehler“. Dabei sind (leider nicht näher beschriebene) Löschungen (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1044250678), Ergänzungen von Merkmalen (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4860198335) oder neue Gebäude (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1374304071) uvm.

Dann sind dabei einige Anpassungen, die irgendwie „halb richtig“ sind.
Beispiel: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/563893868 ist jetzt zwar auf building=service umgestellt, power=transformer ist aber weiterhin falsch.

Nur vorsorglich: Das Umstellen von cycleway=opposite (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25101028) sollte nicht semiautomatisch erfolgen.

Verschlimmbesserungen: Bitte ziehe keine Daten von Betriebsgeländen (richtigere Variante) auf das Gebäude, siehe z. B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/988041064. Was war denn die Fehlermeldung? Eine doppelte Adresse? Das ist dann durch entsprechendes Löschen der Daten am Gebäude zu korrigieren, nicht durch Löschen des way um das Gelände.

Das massenhafte Löschen von amenity=parking_space (z. B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/834167961) ist für mich nicht nachvollziehbar.

Bei Fragen bitte melden.
Viele Grüße
Baloo Uriza (2025-04-03 01:48:36+00:00): Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:branch

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164444166
jmarchon (2025-04-03 03:40:56+00:00): Welcome back to OSM!