piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
マリウス (2023-12-02 11:00:24+00:00): Hi, bear with me here, as I didn't figure out how to do so in the client that I used to submit this update. I was assuming that it would update the GPS location based on the new address.
nevw (2023-12-02 11:57:15+00:00): Ok, I’ll try to shift it to the correct location tomorrow.
nevw (2023-12-02 23:56:58+00:00): Hi, I have relocated it as depicted here
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=144707364
Should render on the map in a day or so
mariotomo (2024-05-20 08:25:48+00:00): converting the above link into a osm-changeset link.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144707364
MxxCon (2023-12-03 02:07:16+00:00): Hello.
Why did you add addr:zip= tag to some features? It's not a valid tag.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144677861
EvanSiroky (2023-12-08 04:43:10+00:00): Hey there! I'm a local mapper from Scotts Valley, CA. I see that you requested a review of this changeset, so I'm giving it a review.

It looks like you're trying to change the name of a business at a particular building. I'm assuming this is because the previous business at the building no longer exists there.

The changes made all seem to make sense! I fully expect that various mapping providers will automatically notice this change and show the Sacramento Furniture Store as being at this address now.

The only issue is that the changes to the "source" tag looked better on the first attempt when it was set to "local knowledge". This value has particular meaning as noted on this wiki page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source

Happy Mapping!
eggie (2023-12-02 07:29:57+00:00): Dag William  Beter was geweest om de BAG intact te laten. Die komt bij een periodieke update toch weer terug.
Je kunt dan van het ondergrondse deel een building:part=...  maken Dat rendert dan niet en dan teken je de 'losse' stukken zelf in.
Nu komt bij periodieke update vanuit de BAG de oude vorm weer terug. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-12-02 07:39:03+00:00): De binenntuin heb ik als inner opgenomen in de mp van het gebouw. Je zou anders niets zien
Eigenlijk zou het anders moeten worden opgelost, want bij hernieuwde update gaat het hier mis. Het is overigens nog altijd te herstellen en dan met building=  en building:part=  werken.
MVG
eggie
opendcc (2023-12-02 19:21:32+00:00): So falsch wie die Schreibweise von viel, so falsch auch der Changeset. Reverted.
streckenkundler (2023-12-02 10:16:35+00:00): Auch hier liegst du wieder komplett falsch... was sagt https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dretail dazu? kennst du die Gegebenheiten vor Ort?
emersonveenstra (2023-12-03 11:16:56+00:00): Hi there,

Would you mind double checking the tags on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1228115808 please? Thanks!
mikeocool (2023-12-04 14:13:25+00:00): Whoops -- thanks for flagging, updated!
emersonveenstra (2023-12-04 19:49:00+00:00): Thank you!
SomeoneElse (2023-12-05 18:00:49+00:00): Your addition of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11388694489/history just seems to be garbage here?
user_20653547 (2023-12-05 22:18:26+00:00): We've also found further so called "Bundesländer Extrempunkte". All of them will be deleted. Best regards from UK
lipuma (2023-12-02 11:22:49+00:00): Dank je wel
NorthCrab_upload (2023-12-02 00:50:36+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10019953670
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3006638644
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10019960236
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10019963424
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10019953677
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10019953674
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10019953671
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10019963270
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10019953669
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/183031048
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/168312371
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/183031757
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/183031375
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/183031522
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/183031273
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/183032045
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/183031028
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/183031158

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
MxxCon (2023-12-03 02:11:53+00:00): Hello.
Why did you tag building=yes on a node that is already in a building?

Also, why did you add invalid addr:zip= tag to some of these nodes?

Also please do write meaningful changeset comments. "Updating biz details" doesn't help people understand what you are doing on a changeset that covers the whole continental US.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144679040
Xvtn (2023-12-13 23:05:28+00:00): Looks great. Thanks for your contributions! (Just out of curiosity, looks like you're a fairly experienced mapper - Did you request a review hoping for someone with more authority to go over it? Or just wanted a second pair of eyeballs?)
Nancy Devine (2023-12-13 23:26:13+00:00): I wasn't sure if I should check the box or not, since all the tasks appear to go through a validation process. Does that happen automatically through the task manager?
Xvtn (2023-12-14 00:11:47+00:00): Oh, I'm not sure how it works in your system, AFAIK checking the box just adds review_requested=yes tag to your changeset, which anyone can view. I'm using a tool called OSMCha to review changesets with that tag. (I'm just some rando.) But perhaps your OSM.us tasks setup has people reviewing all changes specific to that too?
streckenkundler (2023-12-02 10:45:32+00:00): Danke für das Bauen einer Edit-Falle... :(

Das Wasserschutzgebiet hat nun eine Taglose Außenlinie das ist nun prädestiniert, von einem unbedarften iD-Nutzer gelöscht zu werden, vor allem wenn iD-Nutzer nicht gut mit Relationen umgehen können... Toll :(
Olaf der Mapper (2023-12-02 15:57:01+00:00): Hallo Strecki,

lies dir bitte erst DE:Tag:boundary=protected_area den Abschnitt "Relation type=boundary" durch. Dort steht wortwörtlich:

"Bei einer Relation type=boundary sind alle Daten des Schutzgebietes der Relation zugeordnet. Die einzelnen Ways (geschlossene wie offene) sollen, sofern sie keine Tags aus anderen Relationen besitzen, nur erläuternde note=* oder description=*-Tags erhalten"

Dein Tagging der Außenbegrenzung der WSG-Relation mit

boundary=protected_area
protect_class=12
protection_title=Wasserschutzgebiet-Schutzzone III
short_protection_title=WSG III

war somit regelwidrig.

LG Olaf
MxxCon (2023-12-03 02:15:36+00:00): Hello.
Please pay attention to correctly tag crosswalks with traffic lights vs the ones with just stop signs.
GinaroZ (2023-12-04 16:52:43+00:00): In case you were wondering, I did that at the Bevy as basically the path is wide and also used by vehicles servicing the park etc, assume the same applies for these ones in the Glen?
andrum99 (2023-12-04 17:06:20+00:00): Thanks. Yes, the same applies in the glen. I was careful not to apply it to paths which aren't wide enough, although that doesn't stop council workers driving their van down any old path.
EvanSiroky (2023-12-08 04:32:20+00:00): Hey there! I'm a local mapper from Scotts Valley, CA. I see that you requested a review of this changeset, so I'm giving it a review.

I see that you're adding a bunch of bike lane information which is great! I think the only tip I can give you is that you don't need to worry about adding bike lane info for each side on one-way streets except in very special situations where bike travel is allowed in the direction opposite to car travel.

See this wiki page for more info: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway

Happy mapping!
Olaf der Mapper (2023-12-02 02:14:49+00:00): sorry meine seewald lg olaf
MxxCon (2023-12-03 02:35:36+00:00): Hello.
In this changeset you also added building=yes to nodes that are already mapped inside of buildings. That goes against https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element guideline.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144680011
SomeoneElse (2023-12-02 16:17:20+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15439
opendcc (2023-12-03 03:26:34+00:00): Reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144709680
Reason: the only intention of this changeset was to bring in some advertisment (layout of mapped buildungs).
tastrax (2023-12-04 21:21:33+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
Ripe Squash (2023-12-05 01:49:30+00:00): Thanks for fixing that. Will keep that in mind in future.
SomeoneElse (2023-12-05 17:50:57+00:00): Your edit to https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/410742644/history looks like garbage to me.  Got any evidence for it?
Vadmium (2023-12-03 06:33:13+00:00): I think I intended this to interpolate the unit numbers (1/41–3/41), since the street numbers are the same. Do you think that’s too confusing or ambiguous?
Warin61 (2023-12-03 08:49:45+00:00): I think the addr:interpolation is only for the house number, nothing to do with the unit number.
yawfle (2023-12-02 06:21:11+00:00): Hi! I like the idea of adding this data, and might pitch in myself if you can tell me where to source the information.

That said, I wonder if maybe there's a better tag to use than "name"... it seems like data consumers might want the option to treat this differently than street names, which are more useful to people on the ground, when rendering. What do you think of instead using this tag?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:official_ref
stst415 (2023-12-02 14:57:42+00:00): Hi Yawfle.  Thanks for the comment.  While I agree that official_ref might be more technically correct, it's less useful since it'll never display to the public in the vast majority of maps.  I work in the film industry where it's useful to us to be able to access these alley names for film permit applications, for example.  I've added many hundreds (possibly thousands) of these alley names already and my solution has been to use the name:signed=no tag instead, so as to show that there are no physical street signs with these names (except in the rare cases where there actually are signs).  As for pitching in, here's where I can use help!  Los Angeles uses these 5-digit numbers.  Burbank uses a format like "Alley X of Z" (where X is North, South, East, or West, and Z is a major named street).  But what about the city of San Fernando??  I haven't been able to find what they designate their alleys (it's possible, of course, that there's simply NO name for them in their city limits, but I can't be sure yet).  --- Scott
yawfle (2023-12-04 01:49:20+00:00): Well, arguably this data fills a niche use case, and it's possible that the average user would simply consider it clutter, given that:

* it seems to change every block, unlike street names, resulting in far more labels being rendered

* AFAIK it rarely corresponds to any visible thing on the ground (i.e. a sign)

It's not a hill I'm willing to die on, but it might be nice to at least start a discussion somewhere and see if there's a consensus. Anyway, I have no idea about San Fernando, sorry. It's not even clear to me where you're sourcing the information for L.A... if it exists on data.lacity.org then it's doing a really good job of hiding from me. :D
stst415 (2023-12-04 02:05:05+00:00): Yes, it changes per block which actually makes it MORE useful than, say, Burbank's system since it helps to pinpoint more specifically.  And, it IS a hill that I'd die on because I've spent literally countless hours over 2 years adding these (as well as streams & rivers, my other project), but, in general, I'd argue it's not niche.  If I had an alley behind my house, I'd sure want to know its proper designation.  :-)  And I mentioned city permit applications, but it's also useful for emergencies (I've even once called 911 about an encampment fire and I referenced the adjacent alley name).  And, like I said, they're tagged as to whether they're physically signed or not.  Thanks again for the feedback.  Cheers!   :-)
aceman444 (2025-05-18 15:48:03+00:00): Zdravim, aky je zdroj nazvov tych ciest "Cesta na ..." ?
Matt_ (2023-12-02 04:43:40+00:00): Wrong description. Just moved node to correct location based on NID.
Matt_ (2023-12-02 04:43:43+00:00): Wrong description. Just moved node to correct location based on NID.
Glassman (2023-12-02 18:33:45+00:00): I reverted your edit that added nonexistent objects. I'll send you more info on OSM in a private message.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144681358
arjunaraoc (2023-12-05 05:25:34+00:00): Please restrict each changeset to a smaller area  within a district /state.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144681549
BCNorwich (2023-12-03 07:57:45+00:00): Hi, The traffic mini_bumps node joined two highways, making a duplicated section of highway. So I've deleted that mini_bumps node in order to remove the duplicated highway section.

Please place the bumps correctly without disrupting routing.

Regards Bernard.
user_11609320 (2023-12-02 05:36:09+00:00): old roadbed north of cartago is the southbound lanes
user_11609320 (2023-12-02 05:41:05+00:00): the southern half of the lone pine subdivison right of way, south of the town of  grant is gone
arjunaraoc (2023-12-19 01:21:03+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). addr:housenumber should be  only housenumber full address can be given with addr:full   Resolved by deleting subsequently by the original editor.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144681669
OSM_RogerWilco (2023-12-03 09:38:28+00:00): Hallo Bergischer,

es wäre schön, wenn Du aussagekräftigere CS-Kommentare verwenden würdest, damit man leichter nachvollziehen kann was und warum Du etwas getan hast. 

Ich habe gesehen, dass Du flächendeckend Daten an Kirchen ergänzt. Woher stammen die Daten?

Viele Grüße
Roger Wilco
Bergischer (2023-12-06 13:07:22+00:00): Aus Wikipedia
Bergischer (2023-12-06 13:07:48+00:00): Aber Du kannst es auch gerne rückgängig machen, wenn was falsch ist.
user_17222985 (2023-12-02 09:32:42+00:00): Renaming
user_5359 (2023-12-06 07:10:02+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1228182561. What is the mean of the tag waterboies = yes? Did you mean natural=water?
Niruta Neeupane (2023-12-06 14:45:31+00:00): I guess it was typo. And yes please visit OSM wiki to ensure that the tag you gave is correct if you don't know about it. Happy mapping!
MxxCon (2023-12-03 02:41:16+00:00): Hello.
Please note that except for proper names(and a few other exceptions), all tag values should be in the lower case. So "LED" it should be "led".

Also you still haven't explained the meaning of "cover=y" tag.

As documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dstreet_lamp light_colour= tag should be light:colour=, 
light_count= should be light:count=
operator_type= should be operator:type=
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144682384
Dimitar155 (2023-12-09 10:26:05+00:00): Thank you for fixing it!
aceman444 (2023-12-31 17:53:55+00:00): Zdravim, co je to zdroj ZMVM?
Zase nejake prehistoricke nazvy?
Napr. nazov Rovinka - Dolny cintorin som tam dal ja, zrejme som ho videl namieste. Vy ste ho vymazali a dali ste tam Dolnocelansky cintorin, pricom o takom nazve nie je na Internete ani zmienka. Takze aku to ma relevanciu?
DP24PH (2023-12-12 08:09:20+00:00): Tip: In case of conversion from node to indoor area, kindly use JOSM for better mapping efforts, including alignment.


DP24
Warin61 (2023-12-03 22:32:34+00:00): Bus route relation 8552384 has been restore to a past version - it contains the complete route and missing details - ref, name to...
JoaoMMartins (2023-12-03 23:07:17+00:00): @Warin61 thanks for that and sorry, most likely an issue with shared points outside the editing area when deleting polygons
Senihtu (2025-04-24 17:37:02+00:00): Hi!
Kannst Du Dir node 2611450219 nochmal ansehen? Da liegt die Haltestellenplatform auf dem Fahrweg.
(Ich kenne mich da überhaupt nicht aus - besser es kümmert sich jemand, der die Gegend kennt...)
Schönen Abend noch!
geozeisig (2025-04-25 05:33:33+00:00): Hab es korrigiert. Es ist wirklich nicht einfach mit den Bushaltestellen.

Viele Grüße
LockOnGuy (2023-12-02 22:20:31+00:00): Thank you so much! keep up the great work!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144683658
bxl-forever (2023-12-02 10:36:19+00:00): Hello,

Did they really install a "swing gate" here?

On the latest pictures we took, it is just a static piece of wood, it does not move.
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=154849636889882

Thanks in advance.
Supaplex (2023-12-02 13:41:09+00:00): 玩美數位牙醫
台北市中山區南京東路一段86號3樓. 02-2581-7380 · 02-2581-1009
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144684414
MxxCon (2023-12-03 02:41:54+00:00): Oh, I love me some erbsites!🤣
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144684552
CjMalone (2023-12-03 11:28:16+00:00): :) Not my most embarrassing typo, but it's here for life.
MxxCon (2023-12-03 02:44:01+00:00): Hello.
This looks like just a sticker that anybody can stick and rip off at any moment. I'm not sure that this is a "mural".
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_map_temporary_events_and_temporary_features
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144684567
Amin Negm-Awad (2023-12-03 16:54:56+00:00): Hi MxxCon!

Did you read the properties including the sources? It is a mural by Phoeby New York with the name "heart-symbol". For further information please contact AmiW on Mastodon.

Murals are not a matter of size. For example in my hometown we have the "Colognian Banana" what is very small, but get their meaning by distributing it over the town. On a famous place there also exists a "counter-mural", so we have a discussion about it.

Cheers, Amin
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144684567
Amin Negm-Awad (2023-12-03 18:04:02+00:00): I rechecked-it: It is made as a paste-up, a kind poster that is fixed with glue/paint. So you cannot rip it of.

Maybe you consider it not being a "mural", but "mural" means "on the wall". I do not know a better subtype for an artwork on OSM.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144684567
MxxCon (2023-12-03 18:05:33+00:00): Yes, I read the properties, attriburtes and sources of this edit.
I never said anything about the size of it.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:artwork_type%3Dmural

However, this looks like a mass-produced sticker slapped on a lamp post pedestal that can be removed at any moment by ConEd employees or WVBID janitors. This appears to be no different to all the kest gak stickers all over the city, and they are straight up vandalism
Amin Negm-Awad (2023-12-03 18:18:15+00:00): Here you can read about the artist:

https://libbyschoettle.com/about/

He is a well-known artist, with reports in famous journals and solo exhibitions. 

Of course one can remove it or overpaint it. This happens to murals. Every day.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144684567
MxxCon (2023-12-03 18:28:08+00:00): Would you take every other stickers on this pole? https://libbyschoettle.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/street-08.png or here https://libbyschoettle.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/street-38.png

Yes, it's artistic expression of this person, but this type of art is not intended to be long-lasting. They tag things with full understanding that 1)it's illegal 2)it'll be ripped off soon after.

Full-wall murals are usually a different matter. They are usually sanctioned or even commissioned.
Amin Negm-Awad (2023-12-03 19:37:20+00:00): It is not a sticker as mass-printed stickers. Please get informed about paste-ups. Paste-ups are intended to be long-lasting. 

Also ordinary murals are illegal in some cases, in some cases they are not. Being art does not depend on the legality. 

And it is not "this person", but a world-class artist. To compare an artwork of him with industrial produced stickers is ridiculous.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144684567
Noman Bin Hossain (2023-12-02 09:21:18+00:00): Empty shop this place.
Noman Bin Hossain (2023-12-02 09:21:44+00:00): There is no Sunny Tea Stall shop.
DeFra85 (2025-09-22 17:18:25+00:00): Wieso steht denn hier die Schranke NEBEN dem Weg und nicht auf ihm?
eggie (2023-12-02 10:59:05+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
silversurfer83 (2023-12-02 19:00:20+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OSM :)

wenn du solche Übergänge einträgst, dann mach bitte auch ein "access=no" dran, da es illegal ist Gleise zu betreten. Damit verhindern wir wenigstens, dass irgendeine App auf die dusselige Idee kommt dort jemanden entlang zu führen.

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144685575
Sebastarus (2023-12-04 09:04:16+00:00): Hallo silversurfer83,
danke für den Hinweis und fürs willkommen heißen :) Ich habe nun den Tag "access=no" hinzugefügt zu den drei Übergängen. 
Ich nahm an, dass der Tag "crossing=informal" aus dem Drop-Down quasi dasselbe aussagt.

Grüße
Sebastarus
silversurfer83 (2023-12-04 10:38:33+00:00): Moin und danke für die schnelle Reaktion :)

Verstehe den Gedankengang, leider reicht das aber noch nicht aus, dass eine Routenführung verhindert wird.

Weiter viel Spaß an der Karte

Silversurfer83
ToniE (2023-12-05 16:35:42+00:00): Servus,

ich hatte das network als 

Kooperationsgemeinschaft „Vorpommern“

gesetzt, weil ich das so auchn auf Webseiten gefunden hatte.

Wenn 

Kooperationsgemeinschaft Vorpommern

besser ist, so kann/sollte ich das bei PTNA ändern.

Gruß
Toni
bwbuz (2023-12-05 16:41:46+00:00): Das war mein Fehler...schon korrigiert...hoffe, ich habe alle erwischt.
Sorry ;-)
ToniE (2023-12-05 16:47:29+00:00): Kein Problem.
Ich habe keine Ortskenntnisse und werde mich hüten diesbezüglich Vorschriften zu machen. PTNA kann ich jederzeit anpassen - sogar beides zulassen.

Gruß,
Toni
bwbuz (2023-12-05 16:52:41+00:00): Lass mal so...ich habe es zwar in verschiedenen Schreibweisen gefunden aber in den Beförderungsbestimmungen und auch in anderen offiziellen Dokumenten wurde es mit Anführungsstrichen verzeichnet...daher werde ich mich auch künftig daran orientieren.

Netten Gruß
Werner
silversurfer83 (2023-12-02 13:45:30+00:00): Moin

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3221860402

Die Gelbe Post betreibt keine eigenen Filialen mehr. Daher gibt es: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:post_office%3Dpost_partner

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144685709
Gonéo (2024-07-03 13:36:25+00:00): Sur les photos aérienne, la chapelle Bel-Air n'existe plus