piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Adam Franco (2023-01-31 19:25:06+00:00): @Udarian, please read through at least the whole "Approach" and "Classification" sections of: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States/2021_Highway_Classification_Guidance

Over the past few years, the US community is shifting from "what does it look like" definition of highway=trunk to a "what purpose does it serve in regional connectivity" definition.

If you are zoomed way out to see the whole state of Florida, what is the route between West Palm beach and Cape Coral? Or Port Saint Lucie to Sarasota? That is the level of regional connectivity that highway=trunk is implying. 

While that particular viaduct serves a very significant destination, even MIA itself is a destination local to only Miami and its surrounding communities. The airport itself isn't as regionally significant a destination as a city itself.

Whether the cargo terminal is of similar significance as other nearby highway=primary roads (US-41, FL-953, FL-948, etc) or is of similar significance to the nearby highway=secondary roads (FL-968, Northwest 25th St, etc) is something that I don't have the local knowledge to guess at.
Hufkratzer (2023-01-31 18:55:58+00:00): Hi, why did you retag https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/602217967 from leisure=track to leisure=horse_riding? To me, it looks more like a track (linear vs. area), more specifically like a racetrack.
If this is true, you should have better changed leisure=track + sport=equestrian to leisure=track + sport=horse_racing; compare https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport=horse_racing .
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=horse_riding is not for horse racecourses.
Udarian (2023-01-31 03:27:51+00:00): Here I can agree that Krome Avenue can be seen as a trunk road but I do not think that Campbell Drive is a trunk road, being more of a primary or secondary road.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131899329
Joseph R P (2023-01-31 03:44:41+00:00): Why so? If FL 997 should be trunk, FL 998 should be just as well to form a thorough connection to US 1 without leaving an awkward disconnected trunk route.
Udarian (2023-01-31 04:10:04+00:00): because Krome is a major road and that serves more than just residential and retail areas connecting homestead to northern Miami Dade and the counties north of Dade county while 	Campbell is just, a road that connects a few retail and residential areas. Though I can see what your saying here so it really doesn't matter all that much in the end.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131899329
GinaroZ (2023-01-31 15:42:00+00:00): Why have you renamed nodes with Albert Place to Albert place?
Benedict Brosnahan (2023-01-31 15:57:38+00:00): When i have been using the map for some reason it never cam up as Albert place is would only come up as Albert st.
mrpulley (2025-01-01 10:02:22+00:00): Both maxspeeds correct
❤️‍🔥 (2023-01-31 06:30:34+00:00): Hi, `tunnel=pipe` isn't valid. You might notice that the underground streams now look the same as overground streams. It should either be:

`waterway=stream` + `tunnel=culvert`

or 

`man_made=pipeline` + `substance=water` + `location=underground` + `oneway=yes`
abakus_uploader (2023-01-31 23:32:27+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
tiptracks (2023-01-31 08:55:04+00:00): Hoi!
ameninty=clinic is uitsluitend bedoeld voor medische centra die dagbehandelingen (dus zonder opname) aanbieden stelt de wiki. Niet alles met 'kliniek' in de naam is dus automatisch een clinic. 

In dit geval is sprake van een psychiatrisch ziekenhuis waar patienten worden opgenomen. Zie https://www.lentis.nl/locaties/kliniek-ouderenpsychiatrie-zuidlaren/

Zou jij deze change willen heroverwegen? Wat mij betreft is het dus een healthcare=hospital + healthcare:speciality=psychiatry
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131899888
Friendly_Ghost (2023-01-31 09:34:03+00:00): Dankjewel voor de reactie en voor het nakijken. Ik zie dat ik mijn inschatting hier verkeerd heb gemaakt. Ik heb de wijziging teruggedraaid in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131912774 en daarna heb ik nog de website toegevoegd. Ik zal hier in de toekomst rekening mee houden.

Mvg,
Casper
Davileci (2023-09-10 09:39:51+00:00): The tag `parking:lane:both` is deprecated in favour of `parking:both`.
Diacritic (2023-01-31 10:58:01+00:00): Hi NEades,

Thank you for your contribution.

Could you please confirm your source for the change of the name to "College Lane". Official naming sources indicate that this lane is called "Grass Tree Lane"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131900111
NEades (2023-01-31 22:35:18+00:00): Hi, I work for Surf Coast Shire Council who is the responsible road authority for this road. The road name is College Lane as per our asset register, mapping system and is physically sign posted as College Lane.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131900111
Diacritic (2023-01-31 23:58:26+00:00): Thanks for the reply NEades, much appreciated.

It's unusual that Vicmap is showing a different name for this lane; perhaps an error on their end. Do you have any mechanism to get in touch with your colleagues in state government to correct the error in their system?

Either way, I'm happy the name in OSM matches the signs.

Dian.
rarad74 (2023-01-31 07:50:12+00:00): Hi. It seems you never learned too much from what other map coleagues tells you. You have poor quality edits everywhere when it comes about roads. You modify roads and not put all the necesarry tags on the. You create a new road now and leave it without any surface tag, nr. lane, speed limit. If is a new road , then it has asphalt as surface. If the re is no speed limit sign, then is default urban speed limit in Romania which is 50Km/h. And that link ( if you really saw it) it has 1 lane.
Lars_TheViking (2023-01-31 23:10:24+00:00): Hello rarad74,
Thank you for your input on these roads and for adding additional tags.  For this link segment, I created the missing road from updated aerial imagery but we will refrain from adding additional tags without definitive evidence from available resources so as not to add any inaccurate data.  Do you know if there is an official policy in Romania for adding multiple extra tags on every road segment?  I do not see it mentioned in the OSM Wiki page for Romania: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Romania
rarad74 (2023-02-01 05:13:56+00:00): If it is not mentioned there, it does not mean that it does not exist. Wiki documentation is never complete or correct. And even worse if you drew the street based on aerial images. That segment has been inactive for a long time. I pass by there periodically. You should have added it ONLY if you saw it in the field from your car.
rarad74 (2023-02-01 05:20:46+00:00): I looked more carefully and we can see even from the pictures that segment of the road as you drew it does not exist. I have access to the same set of images. What you drew is unreal.
Lars_TheViking (2023-02-02 18:36:27+00:00): Hello again rarad74,
	I see that after initially reverting my changeset (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131947027) you remapped the area similar to how I had initially mapped it with the addition of tags confirmed from ground survey. It looks great now, and thank you for updating this. There is a section of the OSM Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_We_Map) that mentions how OSM values local knowledge highly, but that mappers should welcome edits from outsiders.  In this case I was able to add a couple missing road segments, and then you added some of the tags you mentioned after confirming with local knowledge. We are all trying to work together here to make the best map possible.
	Our team aims to follow community guidelines when mapping: Is there a consensus in the Romanian community requiring those additional tags you mentioned when updating or adding road geometry? If there is, it would be nice if it could be documented on the OSM wiki so that other users know about this requirement. Thanks again,
	Lars_TheViking
rarad74 (2023-02-02 20:19:57+00:00): Today I recorded a GPX track in all directions through that intersection with my car so that everything is clear. In Romania, there should not be a consensus on speed limits. It is Law. It is the Romanian Road Code. If no speed limit is specified with signs on a paved (or unpaved) intra-urban road, then the default speed is 50 km/h. On this basis, the police will fine you if they catch you exceeding the legal speed limit in localities.
ivanbranco (2023-02-01 18:39:35+00:00): Hi,

why did you delete this address: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1168485320/history ?
user_18326853 (2023-02-03 08:41:30+00:00): apologies, it must've been an accident. I've added it back
SK53 (2023-02-16 20:29:21+00:00): XC Newcastle -> Reading doesn't seem to exist anymore as a through train.
orthocircular (2023-01-31 02:17:27+00:00): Thank you for helping keep OSM accurate!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131900815
mariotomo (2023-08-31 09:14:47+00:00): hola. podrías ayudarme ayudarte? qué es este "hazard landslide"? así como está, ningún software lo podrá interpretar correctamente. yo mismo no me imagino de qué se trata.
TheJediMapp3r (2023-09-01 02:25:46+00:00): Que tal Mario.  Landslide es una porcion de tierra que se ha deslizado por falta de estabilidad en el suelo.

Es algo como esto:
https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.preventionweb.net%2Fnews%2Flife-saving-landslide-risk-communication-puerto-rico&psig=AOvVaw2KMAp3_-pWO2YIqwymCmV-&ust=1693621505099000&source=images&cd=vfe&opi=89978449&ved=0CBAQjRxqFwoTCICM5fGtiIEDFQAAAAAdAAAAABAE
mariotomo (2023-09-01 05:19:22+00:00): o sea es natural=bare_rock? o natural=sand? Y tendrá quizás un natural=cliff a un lado? Please explain describing the place itself, or if you prefer doing so by comparison, it would be best referring to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:natural
kartler175 (2023-02-27 10:55:20+00:00): Warum legst Du hier eine völlg neue Relation https://osm.mapki.com/history/relation/15411840 an wo doch schon eine https://osm.mapki.com/history/relation/2511819 existiert? Anstatt die bestehende schrittweise zu löschen und durch die neue zu ersetzen und damit die ursprüngliche Historie zu tilgen, solltet Du besser die bestehende Relation weiterentwickeln.
LightSpirit (2023-02-27 12:27:44+00:00): Ich habe an der Relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/20469819#map=13/50.3481/7.8347
gearbeitet. Diese Relation stellt einen großen Wald dar. Ich erinnere mich noch, dass er mir kaputt gegangen ist, auf gut deutsch, der komplette Wald wurde nicht mehr in OSM mit grün ausgefüllt. In keinem Editor konnte ich das editieren, weil der Wald kaputt gemacht worden ist, durch Leute die Trennungspunkte in diese Relation einfach so setzen, das sind die großen gefürchteten Punkte, wo keine Auftrennung mehr möglich ist. Kurz um, ich habe ihn neu anlegen müssen mehr oder weniger. Jetzt habt ihr hier wieder einen Wald der in Ordnung ist, na wie klingt das. Auch das ganze nördliche Dausenau hat keine großen Trennungspunkte mehr, ist voll editierbar.

Ich hoffe, ich konnte ein wenig Licht in die Dunkelheit bringen.

Liebe Grüße
Oliver (Lightspirit)
maraf24 (2023-02-10 11:35:38+00:00): Dlaczego edytując żłobek zrobiłeś tu oczyszczalnię ścieków?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/202003764
user_125718 (2023-11-11 03:43:32+00:00): Lektüretipps:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:phone

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours
❤️‍🔥 (2023-01-31 06:17:35+00:00): hey, it seems like NSI has been configured to ban names which contain the branch. This is something we can change, BNZ has already been changed to allow any name.

https://github.com/osmlab/name-suggestion-index/blob/2130753/data/brands/amenity/bank.json#L2205

what do you think?
SekeRob (2023-02-02 13:38:13+00:00): Hi,

OSM Inspector flagged multiple relation issues on this forest with farmland pockets, so I overhauled and simplified down from 13 to 6 members, then added few more. No need to map duplicate inner outlines, simply select the forest outline and the inside farmland, then hit the + sign in the pop up menu and correct roles are assigned  automatically in ID editor.

See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132003667

ciao
Tjuro (2023-02-01 13:16:41+00:00): Beste Josbert Lonnee,
Ik zie dat je hier een landuse=village_green hebt toegevoegd. Zou hier mogelijk landuse=grass, meer van toepassing zijn?
Zie:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dvillage_green
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural=shrubbery
MVG
Tjuro
Josbert Lonnee (2023-02-01 14:02:31+00:00): Dar Tjuro,
De landuse was een copy-paste actie van mij. Gezien dat jij je er in hebt verdiept; zou jij er van willen maken wat het zou moeten zijn?
Tjuro (2023-02-01 15:52:16+00:00): Ik heb het voor je gefixed. Maar probeer voor dat je iets copy-paste eerst even de wiki te raadplegen, en anders het forum, daar zij we altijd bereid om vragen te beantwoorden. Wij zijn niet met super veel mappers dus dit soort edits kunnen jarenlang onopgemerkt blijven. Van nieuwe changes wordt dan dus ook een andere standaard verwacht dan iets van 10 jaar geleden. Aangezien we steeds betere bronnen en een betere wiki hebben.
MVG
Tjuro
mueschel (2023-02-01 11:39:30+00:00): Hallo,
bzgl. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10595245841

Ich denke OSM ist nicht der richtige Platz um temporäre Umleitungen, die vor 6 Jahren für wenige Monate existiert haben zu erfassen. Die U49e dürfte nur wegen einer einzigen Baustelle überhaupt eingerichtet worden sein, und ist sofort danach wieder verschwunden. Ich kann außerhalb von OSM keinen Hinweis darauf finden.
Hb- (2023-02-01 15:12:23+00:00): Im Juli 2022 gab es noch mindestens ein Schild U 49e in Bergen https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9702303637
Weitere Schilder: in Ovelgönne https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1597613165 und Winsen/Aller https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10598904678
Ich vermute daher, dass die Umleitung noch existiert.
kucai (2023-02-04 06:26:49+00:00): Really, Tengku Baldi Shah?  You sure you are not just miscopying from google maps? ;)
Glassman (2023-02-01 01:13:31+00:00): #TIP: Street names are spelled out in OSM. The reason is that software has a hard time unabbreviating.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131902915
user_18344459 (2023-02-01 01:21:15+00:00): deleted by Greek / ThoNer 2023 | deleted revert 131174940;131209689;131229133;131232131;131232221;131232334;131251901;131254334;131265178;131266013;131301701;131318277;131322584;131329930;131400769;131417293;131424172;131443788;131452338;131470745;131486665;131487957;131511854;131528233;131530209;13…
ivanbranco (2023-01-31 09:15:40+00:00): Ciao accademiadibrera, benvenuti su OSM

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9897478710

^ in questo nodo avete cancellato tutti i tag relativi al trasporto pubblico tranne il nome, come mai?

Inoltre ricordatevi di utilizzare un commento al changeset che descriva le vostre modifiche, "pv" non è chiaro agli altri mapper.

buon mapping
Supaplex (2023-01-31 05:13:37+00:00): 可以用trail_visable=bad
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131903390
danieldegroot2 (2023-02-09 20:35:22+00:00): Source should be (use as reference only)
https://www.archaeology.ie/sites/default/files/media/publications/po19v1-all-counties.pdf
MxxCon (2023-02-01 04:25:55+00:00): Hello.
Is "Burke Avenue Bridge" the official name of that bridge or just something you came up with?

Also please note that the description should be written in a neutral tone, not written in the first person. Also if there's some information you don't know, you shouldn't write that into the description. It's better to use note= tag or even fixme= tag to let others know that this information should be researched and added.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131903809
IraGersh (2023-02-01 04:34:18+00:00): Thanks for your comments.  I did not come up with that name but certainly don't know if its official.  Its how I've heard it described by members of the Bronx River Alliance and NYC Department of Parks.  There's a bridge over the path below that carries the Bronx River Parkway that may also be the Burke Avenue Bridge.  I did a web search on it and came up with many links for both.  

This is my first edit and was unsure as to what to put in the Description.  I'll update per your comments.
MxxCon (2023-02-01 04:38:22+00:00): Please see this article, it documents the proper usage of the description= tag https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description
MxxCon (2023-02-01 04:28:51+00:00): Hello.
Please note that "i was here in 2022" is not a useful changeset comment to help others understand what exactly you edited.
Please take a look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131904050
Dimacn (2023-01-31 10:25:38+00:00): Зачем вы добавляете дороги поверх уже существующих!? Зачем дублируете и портите карту? Там стоят знаки ограничения скорости 40? Почему access=no (недоступна)? Прекратите портить карту.
Glassman (2023-02-01 01:18:24+00:00): #TIP: phone numbers should be entered with a country code, for example +1 509-736-2720
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131904489
nevw (2023-01-31 08:44:37+00:00): The correct osm tag for the named “Service Road” is highway=primary_link and they don’t normally have name.
nevw (2023-01-31 06:54:59+00:00): This should be tagged…
highway=service plus service=parking_aisle for the way in and the parking area should be a polygon tagged with amenity=parking
WoodWoseWulf (2023-08-06 05:30:19+00:00): Hi Hadleton,

Just mapping in this general area and noticed The Letter A. What is it supposed to be?
nevw (2023-08-06 23:23:30+00:00): I noticed the article mentions it...
https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/column-8-whats-in-a-name-20141013-115atv.html
There is an 'A' on top of the big tower at the National Parks office on the road junction. The Letter At is signed on George Downes Drive at both sides of locality.
I think it should be tagged next to the road junction on a node as a locality named "The Letter A" instead of a landuse=farmland
nevw (2023-08-20 03:04:08+00:00): I added name The Letter A as place=locality in Changeset: 140115945
https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=140115945
WoodWoseWulf (2023-08-20 08:54:54+00:00): Thanks nevw, apologies this one totally slipped my mind.
nevw (2023-01-31 06:47:42+00:00): Hi, the correct tags for a private driveway would be…
highway=service
service=driveway
…maybe also access=private
nevw (2023-01-31 08:50:12+00:00): Hi, all your edits appear to have been tagged correctly before your edits. Please make yourself more familiar with osm mapping methodology from our wiki. 
You can do this by doing an internet search for “osm  xxx tag” before deciding to alter the tagging of already mapped features.
nevw (2023-02-11 04:19:44+00:00): no response, reverted as the tags were correct before these edits by new mapper.
Glassman (2023-02-01 01:22:28+00:00): If the building is still standing, just remove all but the address tags. Hopefully a business will take over the space and having the building and address left will simplify adding the new business.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131904965
Dimacn (2023-01-31 10:28:39+00:00): Дорога стала недоступна? Там поставили знаки ограничения скорости 40?
NorthCrab (2023-01-31 12:50:17+00:00): Zauważyłem, że twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Niekompletne dane adresowe, brakuje nazwy miasta. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, zastosuj kombinację addr:city + addr:street. W przeciwnym razie, przekaż nazwę w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10595540706

Dokumentacja adresów:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Stanisław22 (2023-01-31 16:08:18+00:00): Dziękuję za zwrócenie uwagi. Już poprawiam. Pozdrawiam :-)
NorthCrab (2023-02-01 02:42:06+00:00): Super! Ogólnie ta wiadomość wyszła przypadkowo bo nie wysyłamy tego typu informacji do użytkowników mobilnych zazwyczaj :P Zdajemy sobie sprawę że edycja na telefonie nie jest najprostsza.
Udarian (2023-02-01 06:21:35+00:00): questions, why did you remove most of the geometry of 103268602 that I added in commit 131819660, though you seam to have left behind many points along were I had the alignment. the latest imagery shows it there. same with way 103110750, actually with this in particular I am fairly certain it has the h0ole it does having had the experience to go back stage in that area in highschool (6ish years ago now). Also having gone many time to zoo Miami throughout my childhood I almost certain that the surface for most of the customer paths are asphalt.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131905959
Udarian (2023-02-01 06:25:51+00:00): also, why did you remove the species:wikidata=*  from the Florida Panther enclosure POI (id 10587945072)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131905959
Anton Lavrov (2023-02-15 07:07:50+00:00): Hi Udarian,

Re wikidata for the panther - I probably deleted it by mistake, sorry - will bring it back.

Re the two ways you've mentioned - I had some conflicts with your change, I did my best to resolve them preferring you version, but I might have missed something. Let's take a closer look at what you think is wrong.

Way 103268602 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/103268602/history - pedestrian walk through the Asian exhibits) - I think I just added more nodes to it. trying to make it smoother and closer to the satellite image.

Way 103110750 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/103110750/history - service road crossing previous way near sable antelope) - it's now deleted, I think that's because I merged it with another way. What is that hole you mentioned? If I deleted something which you know is there - please excuse me and feel free to add it back, or let me know how I can fix this.
Udarian (2023-02-15 22:16:30+00:00): for way 766788226 I was talking about were it crosses the backstage parts of the Asian Elephant and Indian Rhinoceros, since this commit I have removed this section of that service road again (for reference that would be commit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132471421, you can see this on https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/766788226)

as for the pedestrian way going through the Asia part of the zoo what must have happened is that when you fixed the merge conflict all the points I added for the pedestrian area I had added in commit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131819660 were left behind but I fixed this in commit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132024454