piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ququruzka (2023-10-29 14:24:20+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/133657854/history

name tag was copied without checking. 
Please, do not hesitate OSM UA team for discussion. 
Otherwise, your edits will be clarified as wandalism and should be reverted in short period. 
Please, edit ALL the POI in this changeset 133494755 .
pitscheplatsch (2023-03-12 13:05:01+00:00): Hi.

Could you use the comment field of your created changeset for describing your map edits? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Thanks.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
nurdafur (2024-02-12 21:29:47+00:00): Hallo RicGer

Du hast anscheinend erst vor kurzem begonnen mit Kartografieren. Schön, dass du auch dabei bist. 
Mir ist gestern zufällig aufgefallen, dass es 2 Routen Himmelreich-Jakobusweg gibt. Beide treffen sich beinahe in Friedenweiler und beide haben denselben Text im Tag description. Der eine Weg besitzt network=icn der andere network=lcn. Ich denke, dass network=rcn für beide korrekter wäre. Sollten die beiden Relationen zu einer verbunden werden oder gibt es Gründe für 2 separate Routen?

Liebe Grüße
Urs
Shyshka (2023-03-10 12:35:46+00:00): Ніхто у Стебнику не називає центр міста "Будівництвом". Так історично склалось, що цей район з 60-х років називають Стройкою. Так, це російське слово, але у данному контексті його недоречно замінювати українським відповідником
avinet_ua (2023-03-10 14:31:43+00:00): виправи будь-ласка, якщо так
Myazyk (2023-07-28 19:04:25+00:00): Якщо у селі Ріпчиці мікрорайон названий русицизмом, то від того, шо ти його українізував на карті нічогісінько не зміниться.
Прошу повернути назад ці недолугі редагування
Myazyk (2023-07-28 19:07:00+00:00): І ше, якщо десь у народі і говорять на український манер, то кажуть "будова", а не "Будівництво"
Myazyk (2023-07-28 19:07:39+00:00): Ти вважаєш нормальним робити отакі переклади назв підприємств?
user_21736114 (2025-08-04 09:08:32+00:00): він у цій правці навіть офіційну назву вулиці спортив Дістав цей Авінет Бігає по Україні портить назви коли вже його психіатри примусово вилікують
NorthCrab_upload (2023-03-09 21:50:33+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/429774503
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1153058862

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
VLD549 (2023-05-12 14:25:12+00:00): Hi, could you indicate which source you've used for 'De Bokkesprong'?

Thank you.
emvee (2023-05-12 17:13:12+00:00): Hi, the source says "website" and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/273335916 has a website tag so that should answer your question about the source I think.
Frans S (2023-03-12 17:12:43+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping
About highway tagging:

Please apply the rules described in this wiki
Most common taggings.
Rural areas : Unclassified,  track , path, service
Urban areas: unclassified, residential, path.
When a trace is lined with houses, don't tag it as 'service

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highways

Read also the remarks about tagging of tracks in the instructions.'
btw. A track is default unpaved. No need to add that tag
Best regards and keep mapping
WillemGC (2023-03-13 10:44:01+00:00): Hi @Frans S  thank you for your feedback. That is invaluable. did some extra reading on : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dservice
I'll keep it in mind for future mapping. 
Best regards. Keep on checking!
Rogoyski (2023-03-11 19:46:56+00:00): Z jakiego źródła te pomniki? Wymieniasz w opisie changesetu masę źródeł, ale żadne nie wydaje się faktycznym źródłem danych o pomnikach (chyba że local knowledge).

Moim zdaniem tagowanie wszystkich tych miejsc jako monument jest błędne. Raczej należy uznać je za memorial. 

Pomnik Krzysztofa Kozłowskiego na dziedzińcu Ministerstwa Finansów. Chodzi o ten?
https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Popiersie_Krzysztofa_Koz%C5%82owskiego_w_Warszawie
https://www.flickr.com/photos/msw_rp/10533002983/
Znajduje się zupełnie gdzie indziej.
Rogoyski (2023-03-11 19:50:24+00:00): Przepraszam, w przypadku tego ostatniego pomnika to mi się coś przesunęło. Jest w dobrym miejscu, tylko przetaguję go na popiersie.
Rogoyski (2023-03-11 20:33:29+00:00): "Pomnik Ofiar katastrofy lotniczej w 1980 r." (dziwna nazwa) już dawno nie znajduje się na Skrze.  Teraz jest tutaj: https://www.warszawskie-mozaiki.pl/2021/09/rzezby-przy-muzeum-sportu-i-turystyki.html
starsep (2023-03-11 21:20:09+00:00): Informacje głównie brałem z https://mapa.um.warszawa.pl/mapaApp1/mapa?service=mapa_historyczna z warstwy Pomniki. Lokalizacje poprawiałem na podstawie Orto 2021. W razie braku widoczności pomijałem pomnik. Rzeczywiście miałem wątpliwości jeżeli chodzi o tagowanie, może być ono błędne w niektórych przypadkach - brakuje mi tutaj doświadczenia w schemacie np. pomników historycznych, dzieł sztuki lub religijnych.
Rogoyski (2023-03-12 09:31:04+00:00): Dzięki. Zmieniłem typy pomników tam, gdzie nie miałem wątpliwości na podstawie zdjęć z internetu. W przypadku pomnika na Sterniczej poprawiłem też lokalizację.
MxxCon (2023-03-10 03:17:30+00:00): Is it real grass or astroturf?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133497267
Baloo Uriza (2024-12-24 15:22:33+00:00): I modified this to fit the building's footprint, which is generally the expectation for building=* objects.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133497293
user_18669555 (2024-12-24 16:37:06+00:00): Cool
eserte (2023-03-10 18:58:54+00:00): Hi! Bei der Änderung im privaten Teil der Nalepastraße sind einige Daten verlorengegangen (surface=unpaved, Straßenname...). Kannst du sie wiederherstellen?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133497652
erde23 (2023-03-11 20:45:05+00:00): Habs wiederhergestellt. War ein Versehen. Wobei ich ich nicht weiß, ob dieser Abschnitt tatsächlich auch Nalepastraße heißt. In den amtlichen Karten sieht es nicht so aus.
eserte (2023-03-12 10:12:49+00:00): Nördlich und südlich davon heißt der Straßenzug definitiv Nalepastraße, und die Hausnummern in diesem Bereich suggerieren auch, dass es sich um die Nalepastraße handelt.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-03-09 23:30:36+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10724622265

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
map per (2023-03-10 08:25:02+00:00): Hallo Chanah Kempin,

gibt es hier (1) wirklich einen Buchladen oder sind dort Büros der dtv Verlagsgesellschaft?

Danke und viele Grüße
map per

(1) https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2449484115/history
Chanah Kempin (2023-03-11 20:00:00+00:00): Hi, da sind nur die Büros, ich hab nur keine besser passende Kategorie gefunden.
map per (2023-03-12 09:14:45+00:00): Danke, habs zum Büro gemacht
TrailJunkie (2023-03-10 19:29:37+00:00): Correction: Source used was Esri World Imagery
map per (2023-03-10 08:27:01+00:00): Hallo Chanah Kempin,

gibt es hier (1) wirklich einen Buchladen oder sind dort Büros des Carl Hanser Verlags?

Danke und viele Grüße
map per

(1) https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1406563823/history
Chanah Kempin (2023-03-11 20:00:37+00:00): Hi, da sind nur die Büros, ich hab nur keine besser passende Kategorie gefunden.
map per (2023-03-12 09:17:19+00:00): Danke, habs zum Büro gemacht
JJIglesias (2023-03-10 02:15:52+00:00): Saludos.
La etiqueta (TAG) Operator, se aplica al propietario u operador de un determinado elemento. Youthmapper no parece ser el "operador" de un centro de Fotocopiado en el Pasaje Iturralde de La Paz. Podrias por favor confirmar? caso contrario este cambio sera desechado del mapa.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:operator

Gracias
JJ
BlueButterfly (2023-03-14 18:19:48+00:00): Correction: Source used was Maxar Premium Imagery, Staðfangaskrá
aceman444 (2025-05-28 19:02:47+00:00): Not sure what this changeset is about, but relation's name was not in Ukrainian, so copying it to name:uk is nonsense.
Frans S (2023-03-12 17:34:12+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, during the validation process.

I noticed that you are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.

We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. Just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.

Please map each building accurate over the rooflines.

Square each rectangular building with the Q key.

Nodes of buildings may NOT  connect to other buildings or features.

The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 

Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.


See also this document:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/11PsAW0bzUZHbS8YnbaFzqOYhJY7tSPYG/view?usp=share_link


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133498479
Frans S (2023-03-12 17:37:59+00:00): continuation of previous comment 
You duplicated several buildings which were already mapped. You did not zoom in rather far to see the mapped buildings. See the blue note on the bottom of iDeditor.
Other issues.
You clustered some buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.
The black stripe next to a building is the shadow. Don't include that into your building
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133498479
darkonus (2023-03-10 07:25:50+00:00): Please do not move the objects. The background layer is offset. Adjust the background layer offset in the iD editor: 8.36; 6.57
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133498500
Frans S (2023-03-10 10:31:02+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, during the validation process.

I noticed that you are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.

We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. Just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.

Please map each building accurate over the rooflines.

Square each rectangular building with the Q key.

Nodes of buildings may NOT  connect to other buildings or features.

The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 

Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.


See also this documenthttps://drive.google.com/file/d/11PsAW0bzUZHbS8YnbaFzqOYhJY7tSPYG/view?usp=share_link


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133498573
Frans S (2023-03-10 10:33:54+00:00): Hello again. This are the issues :
Naming of buildings.  Building=yes is standard for HOTOSM projects.
You collected multiple buildings , tagged as 1
Oversized buildings.
Connected buildings to each other with a node.
Most rectangular buildings are  not squared. (66 out of 74)
Please improve your mapping skills
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133498573
InsertUser (2023-03-10 08:44:31+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap,

From the name I think "Bron Ltd." Should probably also have an office=company tag?
Kovoschiz (2023-03-10 02:54:24+00:00): Please don't upload personal edits  or test on  a live public database. This constitutes (accidental) vandalism. You should have upload comments to let others can help if you have mistakenly done something.
dvdhoven (2023-03-10 06:26:09+00:00): Deze changeset heb ik reverted en daarna de kaart op de juiste manier verplaatst.
Je hebt knooppunt informatie van kp 97 weg gehaald en daarmee 3 routes kapot gemaakt.
rcn_ref en network:type moeten altijd op een node blijven staan, die onderdeel is van de routes.

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
jxpsert (2023-03-10 08:29:17+00:00): Oei, sorry! Ik probeer altijd zoveel mogelijk van wegen af te blijven, maar deze leek simpel.
PT-53 (2023-03-10 07:19:41+00:00): Hallo EinEngenerauch hier:
Warst Du vor Ort oder hast Du die tracktyps wieder nur anhand der Luftbilder geraten?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2023-03-22 08:39:29+00:00): Hallo EinEngener,
ich warte noch auf Deine Antwort.
Grüße
PT-53 (2023-04-09 06:53:16+00:00): Wiedereinmal keine Reaktion > Revert
MxxCon (2023-03-10 03:37:31+00:00): Hello.
could you please elaborate what are you trying to map here?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133499054
PT-53 (2023-03-10 07:08:53+00:00): Hallo EinEngener,
warst Du vor Ort oder hast Du die tracktyps wieder nur anhand der Luftbilder geraten?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2023-03-10 07:14:08+00:00): Ist das
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10724631797/history
ein Wanderparkplatz?
PT-53 (2023-03-22 08:39:39+00:00): Hallo EinEngener,
ich warte noch auf Deine Antwort.
Grüße
PT-53 (2023-04-09 06:51:05+00:00): Wiedereinmal keine Reaktion > Revert
rskedgell (2023-03-14 20:36:24+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133684107
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133499271
JJIglesias (2023-03-10 02:10:37+00:00): Saludos.
Favor seguir estos lineamientos:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:amenity%3Drecycling
Gracias
JJ
eggie (2023-03-10 06:22:24+00:00): Hi  Mindy   Welcome to OSM..  Your edits give no sense.
Please don't add attractions name=Amsterdam....  this way with maps.me.
I removed your contributions. 
Greetz,
eggie
Hufkratzer (2025-04-06 12:45:16+00:00): Hi,
diese Änderung hier ist zwar schon 2 Jahre her, aber ich schreib trotzdem mal dazu:
Wenn "Gelände samt Gebäude" ein "Pferde- Ponyhof" ist, ist das kein Grund das Gebäude von building=yes auf landuse=farmyard umzutaggen. Damit hast du eine kleine farmyard-Fläche innerhalb einer größeren farmyard-Fläche (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/793417924) angelegt.
Handelt es sich bei dem Pferde- und Ponyhof um den, der auf https://www.heidberghof.de/ beschrieben ist? Wenn da Reitferien für Kinder o.ä. angeboten wird, könnte man diese Anlage mit https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure=horse_riding taggen. Beispiele:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/97866380
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8331911586
Frans S (2023-03-10 10:39:06+00:00): Hello again.
These buildings are rather fair mapped. However, you did not follow the rooflines everywhere. 
And, buildings should be tagged as building=yes.
Also, square the rectangular buildings.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133500139
rondoncamacho (2023-05-11 19:52:03+00:00): Las modificaciones no corresponden a un mapa correctamente, por favor, revertir los cambios o fuente del mismo ya que contaba con las líneas adecuadas según Instituto Geográfico de Venezuela Simón Bolívar:

http://igvsb.gob.ve/adminigvsb/archivos/servicios/8/servicedoc_220630060019.pdf
tastrax (2023-03-10 04:28:44+00:00): Why have these cart paths been deleted and replaced by 'rough'? This looks to be tagging for the renderer? It would also be good if you didnt digitise bunkers with 'rough' through the middle. They can have common boundaries.
maplemoths (2023-10-01 03:34:51+00:00): Hello Robmcq, I'm just wondering, why did you swap the leisure=golf_course tag from the Hilo Municipal Golf Course to just area=yes? You didn't specify why in your changeset comment, and it feels like removing important information, so i'd like to know why you did this. Thanks for reading.
Frans S (2023-03-10 10:25:16+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, during the validation process.

I noticed that you are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.

We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. Just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.

Please map each building accurate over the rooflines.

Square each rectangular building with the Q key.

Nodes of buildings may NOT  connect to other buildings or features.

The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 

Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.


See also this documenthttps://drive.google.com/file/d/11PsAW0bzUZHbS8YnbaFzqOYhJY7tSPYG/view?usp=share_link


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133501105
Frans S (2023-03-10 10:19:01+00:00): Hello.
There is no need to upload a building at the time.
Just upload whenever you are finished with the task or when you decide to stop mapping.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133501235
Supaplex (2023-03-10 04:04:28+00:00): Do you know the name of the restaurant?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133501326
mavl (2023-04-25 09:05:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:04:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
Frans S (2023-03-10 09:03:50+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, during the validation process.

I noticed that you are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.

We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. Just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.

Please map each building accurate over the rooflines.

Square each rectangular building with the Q key.

Nodes of buildings may NOT  connect to other buildings or features.

The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 
Specific issues. Oversized mapped, Not squared buildings.   Included a yard in a building

Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.


See also this documenthttps://drive.google.com/file/d/11PsAW0bzUZHbS8YnbaFzqOYhJY7tSPYG/view?usp=share_link


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133501891
Frans S (2023-03-10 09:17:27+00:00): Hello IndianaSusan. 
I reviewed this tas as well.
Issues.  Not squared buildings.
Yard included in the mapped building.
tagged a road as 'unclassified' Here, in urban areas  the tag 'residential' is better.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133502079
mavl (2023-04-25 09:07:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
Baloo Uriza (2023-03-10 17:04:49+00:00): A descriptive changeset comment would be greatly appreciated.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133502740
Frans S (2023-03-10 09:06:58+00:00): Hello Daniel.
I noticed that you map buildings not squared.
Don't you use the Buildings plugin in JOSM ?

Tag roads within an urban area, like here, as residential.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133502813
dannmer (2025-08-16 21:07:45+00:00): A note was left today concerning Bear Creek Park and Golf course being mapped as a reservoir/basin. Is there a reason for the way this is currently mapped? Link to note: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4913787
clay_c (2025-08-16 21:34:57+00:00): Thanks for the tip. I left a reply on the note. Some map renderers mistakenly show these giant detention basins as solid bodies of water, which periodically causes edit wars when new mappers remove the basin tags. I wonder if this is related to the rising popularity of https://wplace.live , which unfortunately shows these as permanent water bodies.
map per (2023-03-14 18:56:04+00:00): REVERTED (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133351373)
warkaree (2023-03-10 09:51:06+00:00): Hello

The DAV public school already exist here (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/210343962#map=18/18.55997/73.80393). 

You have added a duplicate node for the same school here. (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10724982877)

Can you please tell the reason for doing so?
Also I’ve observed that you and a few others are adding lot of schools to OSM in Pune. Is this some organised effort to add schools? If yes can you provide contact details of who is leading this activity?

Thanks.
pyram (2023-03-16 17:41:10+00:00): Hallo Niggi,
ich habe den "Lederer" wieder entfernt. Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3597978
skyper (2024-11-25 15:41:25+00:00): Hallo RicGer,
an dieser Stelle gibt es schon seid langem keine Furt (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10724940063/history), wenn es je eine gegeben hat.
Bitte ändere die Daten nur wenn Du Dir auch sicher bist und vertraue nicht allein auf Fehlerüberprüfungen und ihren Vorschläge.

Danke und viele Grüße,
skyper
Frans S (2023-03-10 08:52:48+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, during the validation process.

I noticed that you are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.

We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. Just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.

Please map each building accurate over the rooflines.

Square each rectangular building with the Q key.

Nodes of buildings may NOT  connect to other buildings or features.

The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 

Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.


See also this documenthttps://drive.google.com/file/d/11PsAW0bzUZHbS8YnbaFzqOYhJY7tSPYG/view?usp=share_link


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133505760
Frans S (2023-03-10 08:54:12+00:00): About tagging of highways. Service tags are to be used for access roads to petrol stations, access to a single farm or company. Not as access to houses in an urban area.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133505760
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-28 07:06:23+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1151147273/history has 側=2 key that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What you intended to express by using this unusual key? Is this tag needed? Or maybe can it be expressed in a more typical way that would be easier to understand?