piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
viupu (2025-04-21 17:48:19+00:00): Muutoskokoelma peruttu virheellisen muokkauksen takia. Tie 387 kuuluu secondary-luokkaan. Linkki: keskusteluun aiheesta: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/lappeenrannan-seudun-tieluokitukset/128994

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165251923
A67-A67 (2025-04-18 21:14:44+00:00): Dit restaurant stond al in Openstreetmap. Samengevoegd met bestaande POI.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-04-18 20:31:32+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2499509432
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/467725410

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
MxxCon (2025-04-21 02:48:02+00:00): Hello.
opening_hours tag can't be a link to a google spreadsheet.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165129799
SeveralShorts (2025-04-23 21:06:29+00:00): fixed!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165129799
eggie (2025-04-19 06:05:48+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  Tip... Beter zoiets in twee changesets uploaden zodat je niet met de kaart hoeft te schuiven.

Landuse niet laten 'overlappen''. Dan zie je alles door elkaar. 

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-04-19 06:11:36+00:00): Fixed landuse overlap.
Richard de Boer (2025-04-19 18:54:28+00:00): Dank je Eggie. Ik begrijp niet goed wat je bedoeld met landuse overlappen. Bedoel je dat de contouren van mijn gemaakte gebied over een ander, al bestaande contour lopen?
eggie (2025-04-19 19:03:13+00:00): Yep er lag bos of het grasveld. 

Nu staan de gegevens op het grasveld.
Ik had de overlap verwijderd. 
Ik zie dat je er een boomgaard van hebt gemaakt. Als die vlag de lading dekt is het prima. 

MVG
eggie
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-28 17:27:44+00:00): Hello!

You used
traffic_calming=bump1
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12766878975/history

Have you maybe meant
traffic_calming=bump
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
b-jazz (2025-04-19 01:52:41+00:00): RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1378753422, et al

Hello Meatsia,

The lines that define Fairways and Greens should never intersect or partially overlap each other and we noticed that they are overlapping in one or more of the fairway/green pairs in this changeset. If there is no obvious fringe around the green, the fairway should butt up against the green and every node between them should be *shared*. If there is a fringe around the green that is similar to the fairway, the fairway should extend around the green and the two objects should be merged together into a multipolygon (See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon for how to create them with your map editor).  Please read the wiki for instructions and examples of how to better map golf courses: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls. If you have any questions, please reply here and I'll gladly help clarify things. Thanks!
sbruno93 (2025-04-19 00:29:56+00:00): There it was marked as a street and it was actually a staircase. the correction has been made.
MassCartog (2025-04-19 00:16:23+00:00): Hi Edthebikeguy, Welcome to OSM! I noticed in this change set you removed a trail that does seem to exist. 

If you check out some street side photos from that bridge you can see the trail heading into the woods. If you look at the "Portland Maps Aerial Photo Lastest" Background layer in the editor, you can see the trail continuing into the forest. 

Also looks like there is a good amount of heatmap data showing people are using this trail, and also another trail that is going over to the canoe launch to the north
https://i.imgur.com/iAulgJG.png

You might want to restore this trail until you can take a better look on the ground. I see no reason why the heatmap would show so much activity if this trail really didn't exist. Thanks
MassCartog (2025-04-23 16:03:47+00:00): no response, restored.
Kovoschiz (2025-04-24 09:20:17+00:00): 1. Please read the guidelines first before you make such disruptive changes. `=trunk` is only used for roads with `ref=` here. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hong_Kong/Transport/Road#街道分類_Classifications_of_streets
2. Airport Rd is `=motorway` because it only connects with North Lantau Highway
Kovoschiz (2025-04-24 09:36:04+00:00): 3.  Because of historical legacy, `=motorway` is used for `motorroad=yes` Tunnel Area. However there basically motorway-like Tunnel Area, and those that are not. 
4. `name=` are used on `=*_link` as HK designates them as part of the road, and street name signs would be used on them.
Kovoschiz (2025-04-24 09:41:51+00:00): 5. `destination:street=` is used when the destined road is signposted. This is almost never found in HK.
Enock4seth (2025-04-20 19:34:56+00:00): This changeset created the problem you mentioned at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159477391 , see version 3 of the node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12366118798/history

Please pay close attention to validation messages in JOSM before hitting Upload.

It's a bit dirty now but if you can fix it without creating further problems please do it. Else I will.
user_5359 (2025-04-20 12:29:57+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice the equal sign is the separator between the key and the value. It can't be part of the key. Please correct this!
literan (2025-04-19 10:38:49+00:00): не надо ставить теги foot=yes и прочие на улицах и дорожках. Почему - подробнее см. в моем профиле.
literan (2025-04-19 10:39:38+00:00): пардон, промахнулся, это не вам, а тому, кто этот тег поставил :)
CurlingMan13 (2025-04-19 17:46:41+00:00): Good edit!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165136010
Lezurex (2025-04-19 07:48:22+00:00): Hallo Railton52

Willkommen auf OpenStreetMap!

Du musst mich etwas aufklären: Was hat es damit auf sich? Standort, Häufung und Name lassen bei mir Fragezeichen aufkommen. Worauf referenziert die "Index Nummer"?

LG Lezurex
Fjellrev (2025-04-21 18:45:43+00:00): Waren wohl eher private Notizen siehe auch https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4717489
Ich habe die Fast-Food Plätze mal gelöscht...
CurlingMan13 (2025-04-19 17:46:11+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM.

These should be mapped as landuse, not leisure.  You mapped it similar to a bunch of individual garden attractions, kind of like a bunch of individual botanical gardens.

This is the correct tag to use:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dflowerbed
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165136452
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-05-22 10:53:23+00:00): This changeset changed no_left_turn restriction to only_left_turn
BCNorwich (2025-04-20 06:39:42+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Reffereing to your three changesets.

Unfortunately, all your added highways duplicate existing highways, resulting in the warnings given above. This duplication could seriously disrupt routing. Thus, I've reverted the changes.

Please read the guidance in the help section above. Also take heed of any warnings when uploading data. You may then be able to avoid duplicating highways.

Regards Bernard.
NeisBot (2025-05-17 15:10:27+00:00): Hi Pokotoco, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 90% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 73 building(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=165137348
NeisReview (2025-06-16 05:41:32+00:00): 👍 Thank you for your private message and confirming that your deletions were intentional.
b-jazz (2025-04-21 02:09:44+00:00): If you're interested, there is a MapRoulette challenge for cleaning up partial overlaps between fairways and greens. 

https://maproulette.org/browse/challenges/50926
CurlingMan13 (2025-04-19 17:43:09+00:00): Good edit, and welcome

FYI - you can use hotkey "Q" to square objects and give them right angles.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165138160
bielebog (2025-05-09 16:22:49+00:00): Hallo derbote, 

Dein Eintrag 
owner=Strunz Versicherungsbetrug GmbH
war sicherlich nur ein Versehen.
Bitte lösche Deine Eintragung wieder.
thetornado76 (2025-05-09 17:44:27+00:00): Ich habe es reverted
CurlingMan13 (2025-04-19 17:42:06+00:00): Looks good
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165138350
GOwin (2025-05-27 07:17:22+00:00): Thanks for adding the street names in this neighborhood. That's awesome!
literan (2025-04-19 10:31:23+00:00): это не название, а тип объекта. Только имена собственные, пожалуйста
NorthCrab_upload (2025-04-19 07:00:58+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/914635794

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12766422201

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
pavvv (2025-04-19 10:05:41+00:00): Jest sens w trzymaniu secondary na Łódzkiej i Warszawskiej?
user_21741990 (2025-04-19 11:42:57+00:00): Nie wiem, ja tylko pozamieniałem miejscami kategorie, jakie już istniały, o dalszych zmianach niech ktoś inny decyduje.
Szymiii (2025-04-19 14:51:48+00:00): Nie jestem do końca przekonany do tej zmiany. Faktyczna droga krajowa póki co nie zmieniła swojego przebiegu. W terenie nie ma (póki co) żadnych znaków, które tamtędy kierują tranzyt. W praktyce trudno powiedzieć czy ciąg Szlak Bursztynowy - Moniuszki czy Łódzka - Warszawska będzie bardziej oblegany. Nowa droga ma ograniczenie prędkości na Moniuszki do 40 km/h, jest tam też sporo rond. Nie pamiętam czy na nowej drodze są ograniczenia tonażowe. Póki co chyba jest za wcześnie, żeby przesądzać, która powinna być primary i jaką klasę powinna mieć Łódzka z Warszawską. Zobaczymy jak to będzie pracować, a potem się uzna, która powinna być primary i czy nie zrobić Łódzkiej secondary np. ze względu na ruch pojazdów ciężarowych.
Dawid2849 (2026-04-07 17:02:39+00:00): @Szymiii wiesz może jak wygląda sytuacja obecnie? Oraz czy ta uwaga jest zasadna - https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5238767 ? Według Geoportalu to nie jest Szlak Bursztynowy, ale może błąd
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-04-15 16:12:06+00:00): wycofana w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181375295

na przyszłość: lepiej od razu wycofać
Nakaner (2025-04-20 07:40:04+00:00): Hallo,

vielen Dank fürs Revertieren. Dein Revert hat leider den Bodensee geschrottet. Das wurde zwischenzeitlich wieder revertiert. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165177410

Bitte gib beim nächsten Mal darauf acht, dass du keine zu großen sichtbaren Kollateralschäden erzeugst. Bei der Nutzung von osm-revert empfehle ich, anschließend die Daten in JOSM zu laden und einmal mit dem Validator auf grobe Mängel durchzuprüfen.

Viele Grüße

Michael
mcliquid (2025-04-20 16:25:34+00:00): Hallo Michael,

danke für deinen Hinweis. Ich hätte in der Tat nicht so lange auf eine Antwort warten sollen und es direkt zurücksetzen sollen. Das nächste Mal gebe ich auf jeden Fall mehr Acht. Schöne Ostern!
user_8655426 (2025-04-22 10:05:47+00:00): こんにちは。
ここで変更セット：165099392 全体をリバートしたため、更新されていたタグも巻き戻されています。(maxspeed)
・変更セット：165099392 「制限速度引き上げを反映 」
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165099392

修正が必要な箇所が少ない場合、むやみにセット全体をリバートせずに、エディタを使って一部のみを直すようお願いいたします。
・JA:Change rollback
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Change_rollback

変更セット: 165275943 でタグのみ、もとに戻しておきました。
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165275943
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165140663
zyxzyx (2025-04-23 15:15:09+00:00): この編集は「制限速度引き上げを反映 」とのことでした。way 形状の編集を加えたことはミスだったのかもしれませんが、疑念を呼んだおそれもあったかもしれません。
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-26 08:47:20+00:00): reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410  and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969  remain not answered

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173783844
malcolmh (2025-04-21 06:00:30+00:00): If you have verified that this is so, then go ahead.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-04-20 20:38:17+00:00): reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165211624
NorthCrab_upload (2025-04-19 07:40:48+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/914635794

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
mcliquid (2025-04-19 07:51:03+00:00): Hi and thank you for your contribution!

Please note for the future: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
illogict (2025-04-19 08:52:12+00:00): Hi, and thank you for your message.
That’s duly noted, and I won’t be doing that in the future.
Thank you!
grzegorz75jan (2025-04-19 09:08:17+00:00): Brrrr
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165141240
Frans S (2025-04-24 09:04:54+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping .
Check here how high buildings ought to be mapped.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1z7uDwYm4oNmlexHIhJxGCjPpNhCQAgRia5aEJr_4MwM/edit?usp=sharing

Best regards and keep mapping
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-20 16:50:47+00:00): can you maybe take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4719276 ?

I got confused there
MxxCon (2025-10-16 21:25:03+00:00): Hello.
This source: pdf does not mention this camera. What is the source of your information?
PagoInBitcoin (2025-04-19 18:17:24+00:00): Okay sorry,
this person will now give me his home address.
He works as a painter .
I have already tested his service.

What data is needed for him to be added to the Map?
ivanbranco (2025-04-19 18:23:07+00:00): Does it have an office at his home address?
Comino (2025-04-19 18:53:15+00:00): Companies or services without a physical address or with an address that is not clearly identifiable as a business or office (for example, if it is located in a residential area) may not be listed on OpenStreetMap (OSM). Similar rules apply to Google Maps.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-04-19 08:50:54+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/914635794

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-21 09:38:07+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12768143708/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
fortera_au (2025-04-21 09:56:11+00:00): Hey Mateusz! It is a clothing screen printer, I wasn't too sure what it specifically was and that's the tag Every Door adds in that scenario and I was going to come back to it today but didn't get a chance. Don't think shop=clothes would really match, it's not somewhere you can just go in and walk out with a shirt, but there is a physical presence you could go in and see them and collect orders. 

Happy for any recommendations, otherwise I'll dig around the wiki and TagInfo when I have a moment.
fortera_au (2025-04-24 12:50:09+00:00): I'm just about to update it to shop=printing, seems the most appropriate to me.
ivanbranco (2025-05-06 10:57:51+00:00): It would be better to move the already existing nodes, instead of deleting and re-creating, otherwise the history of the element is lost, see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history

good mapping
Haftpflicht (2025-05-14 12:36:10+00:00): Yes, I am sorry, won't happen again in the future. I have been making these changes using the Organic Maps app, whose options to manipulate POIs are a bit limited. Using said app one can not "move" POIs; not even properly delete them. The app shows a big red button saying "This place does not exist"; if I would have known before that instead of deleting a POI it leaves a note (the ones that you have all resolved, thank you for that!), I would not have used it that way. For the future I will make more use of the iD editor.
ivanbranco (2025-05-14 12:45:14+00:00): No problem, thank you for improving the map. If you don't know them already, there are some good mobile apps that can move nodes around, like StreetComplete and EveryDoor.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-14 14:34:45+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12768162064/history has guest_house = hotel that was added in this edit
Would it be hotel? ( tourism=hotel - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dhotel )
Guest house? ( tourism=guest_house - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dguest_house )

Something else?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-11 04:17:51+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4717686312/history has shop = fast_food that was added in this edit
shop=fast_food ? Is it amenity=fast_food ? If not, what this tag is intended to mean? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dfast_food
mavl (2026-05-03 05:38:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 182142872 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20224].
mackerski (2025-04-19 10:31:43+00:00): You updated the whole island of Ireland to be a public toilet. What was the intention here? I've reverted the edit.
dónal (2025-04-19 10:36:57+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7681896 was changed in error. A member of the community is preparing a reversion changeset to fix it.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165145301
asdfwqer (2025-04-26 04:54:03+00:00): Исправлять Красный Бор, после своей "актуализации" вы, я так понимаю, не собираетесь? Или у вас какое-то принципиально негативное отношение к полигонам жилых зон?
Константин Гам (2025-04-26 07:47:02+00:00): Интересный способ благодарности у вас. Я действительно актуализирую множество деталей в Красном Бору, так как обкатал пару сотен км по нему.
И да, у меня есть негативное отношение к землепользованию равному тегу place.
Удалив его я исправил вводящее в заблуждение залитие всего резидентиалом.
Сейчас как раз выдался часок, я внёс ещё данных, заодно и деталей земли. 
Можете помочь с отрисовкой актуального landuse, буду признателен.
asdfwqer (2025-04-26 12:09:33+00:00): Да, сейчас я заметил, что вы начали отрисовывать жилые зоны, потому прошу прощения. Поторопился с выводами. Просто, слишком часто тот, кто удаляет жилые зоны попросту оставляет вводящие в заблуждения белые пятна. А кроме меня, как мне иногда кажется, возвращением жилых зон, особенно за городом, толком никто и не занимается.
bxl-forever (2025-04-19 11:11:33+00:00): Hello.

Can you please explain the "tagging corrections" you are applying here?  A more descriptive title would help.

For instance, it looks like you are adding "addr:country=BE" and "addr:state=VLG" to several buildings at once, like this one.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/326426300/history
It looks like this is not a standard practice to map addresses in Belgium.  This is why we are asking if you would be so kind to explain why you are adding such tags.

Thanks in advance.
TangledRockets (2025-04-19 17:14:52+00:00): Hi Bxl,

My apologies, I didn't realise the address tagging usually excludes state and country in Belgium. I am usually mapping in Germany, and those tags are automatically added by my presets. I will go through and revert them.

"Tagging corrections" because I was resolving osmose-errors rather than adding or changing information.  (For example a misspelled street name like Hendrik I Lei => Hendrik I-Lei). I should probably use more descriptive titles when tagging in other regions. I will revert the addr:country and addr:state tags now. If there are any other discrepancies let me know and I will change them back.

Thanks,
TR
TangledRockets (2025-04-19 17:27:32+00:00): Revert done:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165164091
bxl-forever (2025-04-19 17:33:12+00:00): OK, thanks for the reply and the fix.
Happy mapping.
geow (2025-08-16 18:12:23+00:00): Servus Alex, du hattest hier einen Biergarten eingetragen. Laut osm-wiki sollen reine Außenbewirtungsbereiche ohne die Möglichkeit eigene Speisen mitzubringen, nicht als amenity=biergarten, sondern als leisure=outdoor_seating erfasst werden, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity=biergarten
Ich habe es bereits geändert, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170535522#map=19/47.884217/12.268172&layers=N

Beste Grüße, geow
osmviborg (2025-04-19 11:53:04+00:00): Større veje indenfor industriområder er altid 'unclassified', rettet.
qrisztly (2025-04-19 12:02:43+00:00): Ok.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2025-07-13 20:32:04+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/452501196 essa via não deveria ter sido transformada em track
Rodrigo Rega (2025-04-20 20:58:41+00:00): Hola,

Recuerda que el "disused:" no solo va en el nombre, debería ir también en el resto de etiquetas relacionadas exclusivamente con el nombre.

Gracias por tus ediciones.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165147880
eggie (2025-04-19 14:27:58+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback  Je hebt alleen de openingstijden verwijderd. Was dat wel de bedoeling?
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
hrooz (2025-04-19 15:55:25+00:00): Het restaurant is definitief gesloten en bestaat niet meer als dusdanig.
Mag van de kaart verwijderd worden. 
Zie ook https://www.maatveld.com.

Mvg,
Hans