piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Allroads (2023-02-24 16:25:06+00:00): Ik kwam hier vanwege een melding van Peewee defrag wegen tool
nr.3
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/qgis-cloud-sponsort-met-extra-mb-cloud-ruimte/4500
Dit was ik aan het bekijken om eigen mogelijke foutjes/mogelijke verbeteringen, op te lossen, ben met de N278 bezig, waar ik laatst langs reed naar Vaals en Aken en terug.
Als je dan data aanvult, dan kan het zijn dat aan de andere kant een gelijke ontstaat, als je dat niet op valt in de editor ( er zijn ook zoveel zaken om op te letten) kom hij bij peewee defrag naar voren.
Dan kijk je wel eens naar de oorzaak, waarom, Zuid Limburg was weer leeg met meldingen, toen zag ik een ander, de knip, zomaar midden op een fietspad, en dan kijk je verder, en zag wat verschillen.  Waarom, welke tagging waar, kijkend naar https://smoothefiets.ddns.net/html/verkeersbordenkaart/index.php?lat=50.929419425&lng=6.024584770&z=16, welke verkeersborden staan er. Klopt het met de beelden. Bij het ene kruispunt en het andere, staat use_sidepath goed voor alle vervoersvormen. Of moet het  =no zijn. C borden. Ik heb dat aangevuld.
Op zoek naar de bebouwde kom grens Landgraaf en de overgang van G11 naar G12a, bromfietsdoorsteek, en de traffic_sign=NL: notatie.


Die notatie, die je dan kan gebruiken, of, bij NDW verkeersborden, bij bijvoorbeeld een G11, in Openstreetmap goed staat of dat er use_sidepath op de weg als er geen C borden staan.

Jij, heel, heel veel dank voor de vele beelden op Mapillary, een geweldige steun. ;-)  

Zo ook bij de N278, wat geleidt heeft tot een paar verkeersmeldingen naar de Provincie.

Nu kijkend moet ik nog wat verbeteren, een stukje niet aangevuld.

Heb ook nog niet de surface op de fietspaden gezet en de lanes aangevuld. De lanes and road attribute, mapcss style Josm is handig. Vooral bij het zetten van turn:lanes.

Zo is er altijd wat te doen ;-)

Map ze.

Groeten Allroads.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-17 22:10:22+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1101214884
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/375873850

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o miejscowości. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, zastosuj kombinację addr:city + addr:street. Jeśli nie, przekaż nazwę miejscowości w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6461983194

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Sarogun351 (2023-02-18 05:55:54+00:00): Zrozumiałem, ja naprawię te problemy
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-02-18 14:13:17+00:00): Na podstawie czego ta edycja była robiona? 

Czy np. w jakiś sposób notka https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1822663 została zweryfikowana?
Sarogun351 (2023-02-18 15:27:21+00:00): tak
aceman444 (2024-04-29 20:02:54+00:00): Nevymyslajte si nezmysly do addr:housename. Ak sa tak budova naozaj nazyva, patri to do 'name'. Samozrejme treba dolozit zdroj, ktore Vy zasadne neuvadzate.
cyton (2023-02-18 03:35:26+00:00): danke, davon gibts hier noch einige mehr
Jan Olieslagers (2023-02-19 10:40:06+00:00): As I understand, from en:wikipedia among others, the place has not yet formally ceased to be an aerodrome, even if it is presently not in use. I feel inclined to add 3 tags: "aeroway=aerodrome","icao=EGXD","disused=yes".
thx811 (2023-02-19 15:53:37+00:00): Hello, I'm fairly certain the airfield is disused as it is no longer listed in the UK military AIP (https://www.aidu.mod.uk/aip/aipVolumes.html#ad-tab). Those tags would seem appropriate, so I've added them in.
Jan Olieslagers (2023-02-19 16:00:48+00:00): Very nice, thanks! Also great to have a pointer to the military AIP, I think few countries have theirs available online.
Damelin (2023-02-18 20:19:10+00:00): Hallo Ulrich,
Google Maps (Satellitenbilder) sind als Quelle für OSM nicht zulässig, der Grund dafür liegt in den unterschiedlichen Lizenzen.
Und gebe zukünftig bitte die Quelle(n) für Deine Changesets an (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:source).

Mit freundlichen Grüßen Dlurak
Ulrich Windl (2024-02-24 23:26:58+00:00): Google Maps ist nicht die Quelle; die Quelle ist lokales Wissen. Nur indem andere das evtl. nicht sehen können, kann man ja vielleicht bei Google Maps nachsehen, dass dem so ist, wie ich sage.
Local-Mapper (2023-02-17 22:48:41+00:00): This was formerly named FPL Energy Wyman LLC. Changeset comment lists the incorrect company.
Jan Olieslagers (2023-02-18 10:25:50+00:00): I should think the aerodrome=military can also be removed?
thx811 (2023-02-19 16:33:49+00:00): Hello, I've removed it and also added  disused:aeroway=aerodrome
Carto_Ferret (2023-02-17 22:51:12+00:00): Added culvert, not bridge.
Frans S (2023-02-21 09:20:30+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. However, not all buildings are fair squared.
Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132697765
alessandrocarmeli (2023-06-22 16:35:58+00:00): come mai hai cambiato i nomi alle fermate in zona monrupino?
MitjaJez (2023-06-22 19:57:36+00:00): Si šel kdaj na teren in videl kaj piše na tabli?
alessandrocarmeli (2023-06-23 09:54:48+00:00): Tranquillo lavoro in TT da tempo proprio sh in carso. Io metterei questi nomi in loc_name e terrei quelli aziendali in name. Ad esempio zupanstvo lo trovi in molti altri posti e dunque molti duplicati (ad esempio sgonico ed aurisina municipio)
MitjaJez (2023-06-25 19:09:49+00:00): Vsa uradna it imena so zapisana v tagu official_name:it, ker slovenskih nisem uspel dobiti drugje kot na sami tabli na lokaciji. Večina imen je striktno uradniških in so zelo pogosto nesmiselna. Zato je bolje uporabiti lokalna imena, ki jih poznajo "vsi". Za turiste so seveda vsa imena nova. Za unikatno št so zadolžene reference tag "ref", ki ga pa nisi redno vnašal.  Podvajanje imen ni težavno. Celo nasprotno, en pogost primer, če imata postaji na obeh straneh ceste enako ime se jih lahko prepozna kot ena dvosmerna točka.
czebureks (2023-02-18 13:47:14+00:00): Cześć! Ta relacja nie była popsuta - moim zdaniem osobnym elementem jest zbiornik, który wciąż częściowo funkcjonuje, a osobną - teren budowy, który jest większy i obejmuje również wysepkę. Pozdrawiam
B_KSL (2023-02-18 14:49:49+00:00): Ok, zestaw wycofałem. Technicznie nie jest to do końca poprawne. Nie wiem co oznacza, że "częściowo funkcjonuje" ale teraz mamy 2 różne landuse na siebie nałożone. Zwykle to błąd - albo teren jest budową albo funkcjonuje jako zbiornik. I jako błąd będą to traktowały walidatory. Pozdrawiam
czebureks (2023-02-18 17:59:17+00:00): Ok, dzięki za zwrócenie na to uwagi - poprawiłem teraz tagi tak, żeby nie dochodziło do takich konfliktów. Wydawało mi się wcześniej, że jakaś część zbiornika pozostała nieosuszona, ale po dzisiejszej wizji lokalnej stwierdzam, że jednak jest to w większości osuszony teren podmokły, stąd zamieniłem "landuse=reservoir"+"intermittent=yes" na "natural=wetland".
B_KSL (2023-02-18 18:21:32+00:00): Jesteś na miejscu, widziałeś to wiesz lepiej. Ja mogę tylko pomędzić, że lekko naruszało reguły. Teraz na pewno jest lepiej. Dzięki!
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-18 07:33:23+00:00): Please do not add non-existent features, such as:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1147217385/history

And other things similar in nature.  Changeset is being reverted.
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-18 07:36:16+00:00): Reverted in:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132704433
Fizzie-DWG (2023-02-18 05:30:57+00:00): (Traduit par Google)
Bonjour PèreForez. Merci pour votre enthousiasme à cartographier ces mémoriaux, mais le site auquel vous faites référence est protégé par le droit d'auteur (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/deed.fr) et nous ne pouvons donc pas faire l'utilisation de ces données sans leur autorisation expresse et préalable. Avez-vous cette autorisation ? Graeme Fitzpatrick, Groupe de travail sur les données OSMF
_________________________

Hello PèreForez. Thank you for your enthusiasm in mapping these memorials, but the site that you are referring to is protected by copyright (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/deed.fr) and so we cannot make use of this data without their express, prior, permission. Do you have this permission? Graeme Fitzpatrick, OSMF Data Working Group
Anton Melnichuk (2023-02-18 07:34:44+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Russian%E2%80%93Ukrainian_war please not edit map in Ukraine
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-18 07:36:53+00:00): Please do not add non-existent features, such as:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1147217385/history

And other things similar in nature. Changeset is being reverted.
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-18 07:39:39+00:00): Reverted in:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132704533

User reported to admins/DWG for further action.
cyton (2023-02-18 03:04:03+00:00): bitte für building:part immer den hausumring mit drumherum bauen, ansonsten geht der teil "verloren".
siehe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_3D_Buildings
ja, das ist mehr arbeit, aber genauer. leider muss man dann die ganzen nodes vereinen von dem neuen teil, insofern ist das schon mühselig, ja
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132698854
cyton (2023-02-18 03:04:28+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3255116
cyton (2023-02-18 02:57:14+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2621617
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132698935
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-28 09:24:18+00:00): Why are you mapping things temporarily, and not just mapping things that actually exist?
cyton (2023-02-18 02:56:12+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2621635
cyton (2023-02-18 02:55:04+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2621634

ich hatte die note aufgemacht, da ich das von zuhause aus nicht prüfen kann, dafür müsste es meiner meinung nach vor ort ein schild mit namen geben. 

wurde das vor ort so geprüft?
Pieter Vander Vennet (2025-04-08 13:41:35+00:00): Hi, is https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10675029411#map=19/-37.413824/144.980677 a changing place with a changing table _for adults_?
Benjamin Ceravolo (2025-04-08 21:37:14+00:00): Yes, https://www.accessmobilitysolutions.com.au/services/changing-places-australia/

Is a useful guide if you have not seen one before.
Pieter Vander Vennet (2025-04-09 12:28:05+00:00): Yeah, I'm aware of them. I'm trying to get the tagging standardized and am doing a small cleanup of the changing places. From context, it wasn't clear if this toilet was actually one.

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:brand%3DChanging_Places and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Wheelchair_accessible_toilets for more info. I'm also adding a ton of wheelchair-accessibility related questions to mapcomplete, see dev.mapcomplete.org/toilets
Kurosawa06 (2024-07-11 22:22:12+00:00): 2024/07/12 : J'ai corrigé beaucoup d'erreurs dans vos modifications. Merci d'être plus précis la prochaine fois ou sinon c'est de mieux de ne rien modifier.
Ces modifications datent d'il y a un an, j'imagine que vous avez progressé.
Bonne journée.
citrula (2023-04-21 09:11:30+00:00): Hello, was marking this section of Eaglemont Drive as a barrier in error?
Glassman (2023-04-21 16:30:15+00:00): I remember there being a barrier system but this doesn't look right. I'm traveling right now but when I get back in early May I'll verify and correct it. Just to note - the road does end and because the nearby golf course is under new development this area is not used.
ivanbranco (2023-02-20 13:55:47+00:00): Ciao fick89,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10675042343/history

qua hai duplicato le informazioni del benzinaio sul cafè, riusciresti a controllare e lasciare solo quelle che fanno riferimento al cafè? 

grazie e buon mapping
fick89 (2023-02-21 20:43:42+00:00): Ciao, la duplicazione non è casuale in quanto c'è una sola società che gestisce sia la pompa di benzina che il caffè associato. Procedo comunque alla rimozione delle informazioni relative al benzinaio?
WoodWoseWulf (2023-02-18 05:36:57+00:00): Hi davidmk!

Welcome back to OSM!

Some quick hints:
-The name=* tag should only be used for actual names rather than descriptions or to provide ownership/location information.

-OSM normally works on the idea of one feature, one OSM element. This means that if a park is already on the map as an area, it doesn't also need to be added as a node.

Cheers for your contributions and happy mapping!
cyton (2023-02-18 02:51:22+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3553886
aharvey (2023-03-24 04:47:20+00:00): Same question as for https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132700494, these are wide tracks accessible by vehicles therefore should be track. Furthermore bicycle=designated implies some signage or markings designating them for use by bicycles, could you point out where such signage was found?
aharvey (2023-03-24 04:50:41+00:00): For reference here is the trail head which only indicates foot and horse riding as designated https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1207284873025559
aharvey (2023-03-24 04:54:54+00:00): for these reasons this changeset has been reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/134048252
ITBeyond-Michelle (2023-03-24 05:05:17+00:00): def horse, walkers and bikes only. No vehicles. Personal first hand use of this track and photos of sign.
aharvey (2023-03-24 13:28:42+00:00): https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1207284873025559 has a vehicle gate, and the track certainly looks designed for maintenance or emergency service vehicles. The access tagging already specifies horse, walkers, bikes may use and authorised vehicles only.
aharvey (2023-03-24 04:45:26+00:00): hi what's your justification for changing these from track to path? From memory and from imagery they are still wide access tracks accessible by 4wd for emergency services and maintenance.
aharvey (2023-03-24 04:56:19+00:00): For the same reasons as in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132700483 this changeset has been reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/134048283
aharvey (2023-03-24 05:01:20+00:00): this changeset has been reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/134048348 as this is a track. Feel free to improve further with tracktype and smoothness tagging.
aharvey (2023-03-24 05:04:55+00:00): Thanks looks like the horse access is correct (I can't see any specific signage at the intersection, would need to check the main sign at the Perimiter Trail head) but https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=334410434732805 shows this is a track so I'll change it back to track leaving horse=yes.
aharvey (2023-03-24 05:07:23+00:00): This has been reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/134048467 as this is a track.
Mundilfari (2023-02-19 20:29:25+00:00): Hi - please stop "fixing" names by abbreviating them. 

Please refer to [1] and [2] for best practices on naming and why abbreviations are generally to be avoided. In short, any data consumer can easily abbreviate "Boulevard", "West", "Street" etc. itself, while automatically and reliably deriving the spelled out form from an abbreviation is often impossible because some abbreviations are ambiguous.
Thanks!

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_keys

[2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Abbreviations
eggie (2023-02-18 07:58:20+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Leo Slager (2023-02-18 11:34:00+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-14 14:25:03+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10675395154/history has shop = machinery that was added in this edit
shop=machinery ? What kind of machines? Industrial machines? Washing machines? Computers? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop for possible values - though maybe new one is needed). Or is it not actually a place where you can walk in and buy stuff? But rather internal company office tagged as office=company?
EvanSiroky (2023-02-28 20:07:21+00:00): Hey there! I'm a local mapper from Scotts Valley, California. I see that you requested a review of this changeset, so I'm giving it a review.

I see that you added the "locked=yes" tag to this gate node. This seems fine, but depending on what you're trying to imply with this, you may want to add some more information. The "access=no" tag may be helpful to add to imply that nobody can open the gate. More about this can be read on the OSM wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
cyton (2023-02-18 03:02:00+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3255116
ivanbranco (2023-02-20 21:17:08+00:00): Hi berlandibara,

place=market isn't a valid place value. Maybe you wanted to use amenity=marketplace?
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-18 07:31:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted.  Please do not do mass deletion of already correctly mapped features.

Further mass deletions will result in referral to the Data Working Group (DWG) for further action.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132701606
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-18 07:40:30+00:00): Please use more descriptive changeset comments.  What did you change and why?

Refer here for more details:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Hufkratzer (2023-02-18 23:20:45+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1147258471 looks more like a riding arena to me (pitch + equestrian).
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1147258472 and 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1147258473 : I don't know, large enough for riding arenas, but look more like paddocks on bing.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1147258484 and
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1147258485 they can't be riding arenas, let alone riding centers.
The tag leisure=horse_ridng should be used for the entire riding center and not on individual parts of it, remember
https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/issues/413
Maybe there is something wrong with the translations (?)
Minh Nguyen (2023-02-19 08:48:02+00:00): Good catch. I meant to use leisure=pitch sport=equestrian in these cases, though you’re right that some of them look more like paddocks.

The translations are fine but I still got confused. Vietnamese has very similar words for “riding arena” (“sân cưỡi ngựa”, literally “horse riding field”) and riding centers (“khu cưỡi ngựa”, literally “horse riding area”). “Khu” and “sân” can both refer to something as small as a playground or basketball field, but “khu” can also mean a neighborhood.

I think I fixed up the horse farm and mapped another one nearby. Please feel free to make corrections as necessary.
5m4u9 (2023-02-18 22:34:16+00:00): Hola Luis, desde la última actualización de imágenes de bing, maxar, esri tienen un desplazamiento respecto a la «realidad». Antes de editar se debería ajustar en el panel lateral a las trazas gps.

Tienes que ajustar las imágenes a medida que subes las laderas, en este caso hacia tembladerani.

como siempre recomiendo es capturar más trazas gps en especial en bici o en automóvil, pero también a pie si se puede por el centro de la calle.
user_18023081 (2025-07-05 21:23:52+00:00): why's there only a single tit
luschi (2023-02-20 19:00:10+00:00): Hallo Blood must have blood,    
in Südtirol sind die Adressen als eigenständiger Punkt erfasst und Geschäfte, Hotels, Restaurants, usw. werden zusätzlich als Punkt daneben erfasst ohne Adresse.     
Die von dir ergänzten Hausnummern sind jetzt doppelt vorhanden, wobei Deutsch und Italienisch nicht ergänzt wurden.     

Ich bitte dich die Adressen nur zu ergänzen wenn sie komplett fehlen.

Speziell hier ist jetzt die Adresse 3x erfasst. 1x als Punkt, 1x auf dem Gebäude und 1x auf dem POI.

Lg     
luschi

PS: bitte entferne die Adressen wieder.
Jakka (2023-02-18 08:28:58+00:00): votre track n'est pas connecter a droite. ne pas fixer le track au landuse forest donne des problème
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1147269762#map=18/50.46465/4.63984&layers=N
PaoloLombardi (2023-02-18 18:29:20+00:00): Ciao. Non ho capito perché hai rimosso il tag "ref: SP183" solo su alcune porzioni di Strada Provinciale tra la Valle Corsaglia e Valle Maudagna.
Se puoi darmi cortesemente una spiegazione sennò li rimetto indipendentemente dal validatore JOSM.
Grazie.
Jrachi (2023-02-18 19:38:47+00:00): Facile, il ref è già presente nella relazione. Si tratta di una ridondanza.
Una ripetizione inutile.
Quando faccio qualche modifichina, faccio girare il validatore, ma non mi metto ad inseguire tutte le problematiche allargando la zona scaricata.
Ivo
PaoloLombardi (2023-02-18 19:56:43+00:00): Grazie mille.
Anche il resto della SP183 include una relazione con il medesimo dato ma il vero problema è che, nonostante la ridondanza, non compare più l'etichetta "SP183" sul percorso sia qui nel rendering che su non so quante App non solo di navigazione ma semplicemente di consultazione di mappe (OSM serve anche solo a questo!) e questo causa inevitabilmente un problema di orientamento sul campo.
Pertanto, validatore o no, non capisco perché solo ora si presenta questo problema che ci metto un attimo a ripristinare le cose.
Un saluto.
PaoloLombardi (2023-02-18 20:01:02+00:00): Dimenticavo...nel caso di mappe stampate da OSM e senza l'etichetta data dal tag "ref" non ha poi alcun senso ai fini di orientamento sul campo.
Jrachi (2023-02-18 20:54:31+00:00): Quello è un problema del rendering non della migliore impostazione dei dati.
Ma se preferisci usare mappe stampate da OSM (che non ho capito cosa siano) rimetti pure i dati inutili se ti piacciono.
PaoloLombardi (2023-02-20 13:15:39+00:00): Buondì.
NO! Se viene tolto il “ref” non compare più l’etichetta sia nel rendering di OSM che nel numero “infinito” di App e siti web basati su OSM (e come mi era stato chiarito anni fa).
Pertanto non è una questione di "piacere" ma di "logica" (come per te quella del "palo in mezzo agli incroci") perché mi pare che quel "ref" sia l'unica soluzione a "visualizzare" la relativa etichetta che indica una strada e balza subito all’occhio se è una “SPxxx” o “SSxx” ecc.
Se poi c'è un'altra soluzione allora ben venga ma io non ne sono a conoscenza.
In caso contrario sarebbe interessante poterla inserire come “eccezione” per il validatore JOSM.

Eh sì le mappe OSM si possono usare anche in forma stampata con le più svariate vesti grafiche! :-D
Benvenuto su OSM! (non ho capito se sei un “principiante”!)
Saluti.
PaoloLombardi (2023-02-20 14:01:13+00:00): PS. Quando decidi di modificare, come da suggerimenti del validatore JOSM, sei poi pregato di completare l'opera su tutto in tratto di highway interessata senza tralasciare piccole o meno porzioni affinché gli altri non vadano in confusione nel correggere o ripristinare le modifiche.
GRAZIE.