piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2025-03-06 07:31:20+00:00): Uitzonderingen voor fietsers toegevoegd.
Ddv01 (2025-03-06 08:33:05+00:00): Je hebt gelijk
ceyu (2025-03-06 16:29:46+00:00): Why can't names have "/" in them? Did you check?
Henry572 (2025-03-08 08:12:08+00:00): Hi kirameister,
thanks for your edit! I just changed it from a post depot to a post office because it's open for customers (at least it was listed as a post office on the website of Deutsche Post).
Hendrik
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-26 14:25:18+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5379310993/history this edit changed shop=supermarket into shop=pet while leaving brand:wikidata 

brand:wikidata is about shop brand that was there earlier and should have been removed

ideally by ED itself, so I created https://github.com/Zverik/every_door/issues/909

but before it is fixed on ED side: please either delete shop entirely and then create a new one or check their tags
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-26 14:26:29+00:00): I fixed this specific one, though not checked other POIs
laurent-38 (2025-05-26 18:26:38+00:00): Hi Mateusz,

sorry for the oversight (I thought of removing brand and brand:wikipedia, but not brand:wikidata), and thanks for the correction.

When editing a POI, it's not easy to spot which attributes should be deleted (brand, brand:*, website, contact:*, delivery, takeaway), and which ones can be left as is (addr:*, level, wheelchair). Some may be difficult to determine (phone: in France, the phone number is often attached to the distribution point, but it can change if you change supplier).
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-26 22:21:49+00:00): oh yes, it is definitely tricky (that is why I also opened https://github.com/Zverik/every_door/issues/909 issue so root cause will get fixed)
Marián Kyral (2026-04-18 06:28:58+00:00): Ahoj,  proč?

"prosím nechat takto bez tagů"

Cestičky a cesty jsou z velké části viditelné na ortofoto a pokud tam není oficiální zákaz vstupu, měly by být normálně otagované. Pokud tam je zákaz vstupu (pochybuji že všude), tak je potřeba správně nastavit acess tag.
Jacopo (2025-03-06 07:27:36+00:00): Al termine del cantiere ripristinare anche la sosta in via san vitale
johsin18 (2026-03-13 17:41:48+00:00): Also die Adressen "Im Schlipf" waren doch alle schon da.  Jetzt gibt es überall Dopplungen.
wies1 (2026-03-13 22:03:18+00:00): Hallo, 
Hm, das ist jetzt schon sehr lange her, dass ich da was gemacht habe, aber ich werde die Tage hier nochmal drüberschsuen. Doppelungen sollen natürlich nicht sein
Gruss
wies1
johsin18 (2026-03-14 10:25:17+00:00): Ich hatte das inzwischen schon erledigt.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179838305
Gruss,
johsin18
wies1 (2026-03-14 14:48:11+00:00): Hallo,
alles klar, wollte gerade drangehen.
Danke fürs erledigen.
Gruss
wies1
NeisReview (2025-03-06 17:55:46+00:00): #NameCheck

Hello and welcome to OSM.

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits, particularly those concerning the names you've added or modified.

Some of these names caught my attention as they are quite unique or a bit unusual. Could you please confirm if these additions were intentional or if they might have been added mistakenly?

Looking forward to your response.

Thank you!
user_22589277 (2025-03-09 13:13:39+00:00): this is correct
NeisReview (2025-03-09 16:17:37+00:00): Thank you for your answer. 

I can imagine that the data you entered are correct. 

However, do you know the OSM Wiki page for using the name tag?

https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:name
Elizen (2025-03-06 08:45:45+00:00): Hello.
Why did you add objects' names with caps lock? And most nodes that you added isn't cities.
silversurfer83 (2025-03-06 21:39:07+00:00): Hi

einfach nur den Namen an das Gebäude zu packen ist leider nicht sehr hilfreich. Es ist ein Anfang, auf dem wir aufbauen können, optimal wären folgende Varianten:

- ein Punkt innerhalb des Gebäudes
oder (!)
- die gesamte Betriebsfläche des Pflegeheims

jeweils mit folgenden Eigeschaften zu erfassen:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dnursing_home

cheers
silversurfer83 (2025-03-06 21:39:56+00:00): (du kannst dir zur Orientierung das Objekt Bergstr. 46 ansehen)
Volker Sämann (2025-03-09 09:23:57+00:00): Den Punkt gab es ja schon, Betriebsfläche wäre optimal ,müsste ich schauen in der katasterkarte vom LGN oder im Feuerwehrplan und dementsprechend nachzeichnen.
silversurfer83 (2025-03-09 09:33:14+00:00): Danke für die Rückmeldung

Dass das Heim schon als Punkt erfasst war habe ich tatsächlich übersehen. Mein Fehler

Habe den Teil "Pflegeheim" aus dem Namen entfernt. "Haus Sonneck" als Name für das Gebäude könnte plausibel sein. Der Punkt (node) mit den Details für das Pflegeheim ist schon recht detailliert erfasst.

Die Fläche müsstest du in Niedersachsen bitte vor Ort erkunden. Uns stehen aktuell keine amtlichen Daten des Landes zur Verfügung und auch Feuerwehrpläne werden idR von Ingenieurbüros erstellt die dann ein Urheberrecht darauf besitzen. Ohne schriftliche Freigabe der Rechteinhaber solltest du keinerlei Pläne nutzen um bei OSM Daten einzupflegen. Da ist der Punkt schon absolut ausreichend.

Ein Einstieg zum Thema der Lizenzen wäre zum Beispiel hier
https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Licence_Compatibility

schönen Sonntag
silversurfer83
Kovoschiz (2025-03-06 20:24:44+00:00): 1. Please don't directly delete, as they still represent a store space, and may contain an address. This makes tracking and updating difficult. 
2. Please don't delete then create the same feature again. This is meaningless, and obstructs tracking. 
3. Please use descriptive upload comments, not signing your name
Kovoschiz (2025-03-06 20:40:24+00:00): 2. Please don't delete properly tagged objects
opendcc (2025-04-05 06:20:40+00:00): NM8 komplett wieder auf tertiary
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-17 00:28:59+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165049947
habi (2025-09-10 06:55:41+00:00): Ciao Defikarte
Ich gehe ein paar Defis nach, die bei https://taginfo.openstreetmap.ch/search?q=description%3Dw%C3%A4hren auftauchen.
Dieser Defi laut erfasster Telefonnummer ca. 1 km weit weg vom richtigen Ort.
Kannst du dir erklären, wie das zustande gekommen ist?
Gruss,
habi
chnuessli (2025-09-10 19:06:51+00:00): Das kann ich mir erklären. Wir hatten in einer Version der App mal einen Bug der die GPS Location nicht überprüft, resp. nachgezogen hat.
syntex (2025-04-03 18:31:25+00:00): To nie jest poprawna zmiana, bo to nie jest budynek
eggie (2025-03-06 09:14:35+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community

feedback: gebruik voor soortnaam species:nl=
en
species=  voor de latijnse naam

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dtree

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-03-06 09:17:11+00:00): Tip  Geen bankjes vastmaken aan paden svp.
gr eggie
eggie (2025-03-06 09:22:24+00:00): Kijk even hier waar denotation voor bedoeld is.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:denotation
NeisBot (2025-03-06 08:45:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was flagged because your added description contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2025-03-14 15:41:09+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/163615387
NeisReview (2025-03-06 10:08:23+00:00): #DataImport
Hi, welcome to OSM!

With this changeset, you've added a significant number of features that appear to share similarities in their tags. Could you please let us know more about the source of your mapping activity? Is this a data import?

Looking forward to hearing from you.

Thanks!
mavl (2025-03-06 13:59:38+00:00): @SinamGomap  
Hello. This changeset is reverted.  
Please, do not add duplicate roads in this location because roads already exist here.
NeisReview (2025-03-06 17:51:11+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/163286762

Thanks @ mavl
NeisReview (2025-03-06 17:49:34+00:00): #DeletionsCheck

Hi, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed many of your changes in this set involve deletions.

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.
MisoBqi (2025-03-08 20:36:52+00:00): Ahoj, keď je to bývalé, nemalo by mať nejaký prefix (disused...)?
Filip009CZ (2025-03-08 21:34:29+00:00): Ahoj, používateľ mi tvrdil, že toto letisko využívajú modelári. Takže podľa mňa by si ho mali vedieť nejak vyhľadať. Nejaký tag na to, že je to len pre modelárov som nenašiel.
NeisReview (2025-03-06 17:48:19+00:00): #DeletionsCheck

Hi, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed many of your changes in this set involve deletions.

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.
felipeeugenio (2025-03-06 11:33:01+00:00): Hello Erica. In the chat, I shared an .osm file (for JOSM) with all the buildings involved. Would you like me to send it to you?
That way, it is easier to find the buildings the project created/touched.

regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163276420
spughetti_tomtom (2025-03-12 08:36:56+00:00): Hi Felipe,

Thank you for preparing and providing this data. We've started validating this project's tasks.

Cheers,
Erica
felipeeugenio (2025-03-12 11:56:04+00:00): ok, thank you.
Be aware of the file, because is an extraction of data that was held before you started validating, so if you try to work and upload the file, you will have conflict you your own editions.
Use it as a reference.

regards
eggie (2025-03-06 09:26:07+00:00): Dag Mart   Je kunt voor doorsteekjes geschikt voor fietsers beter de tag highway=path gebruiken. Op een footway (wandelpad)  mag je niet fietsen behalve bij onderbord fietsen toegestaan.

MVG
eggie
MartReiling (2025-03-06 09:32:36+00:00): Ja je hebt gelijk, net even naar buiten gelopen en het is (itt wat ik dacht) geen formeel voetpad. Dus path idd. Pas m aan
eggie (2025-03-06 09:38:04+00:00): Top! Juist wat alledaags is zit soms anders in je hoofd. 
Ook net om de hoek.
Probeer maar eens je wijzerplaat van je horloge te beschrijven zonder eerst te kijken.
Cijfers of streepjes ? 
Mapse
MartReiling (2025-03-06 09:42:31+00:00): Een garmin fenix 7 ;P, dus digtale tijd in letters, hartslag, hoogte, etc.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-03-14 03:03:01+00:00): See als https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17391
literan (2025-03-06 15:52:05+00:00): вы сломали полигон жилой зоны. Будьте аккуратнее, пожалуйста
literan (2025-03-06 15:52:57+00:00): даже не сломали, а удалили. Это вандализм, не надо так делать https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2595344/history
literan (2025-03-06 15:54:56+00:00): вижу, это не единственные удаленные без какого-либо обоснования объекты. В случае продолжения такой практики, будет откат ваших правок.

здесь восстановлю вручную.
literan (2025-03-06 16:05:47+00:00): Очень много мелких ошибок у вас. Тяп-ляп, абы как. Не надо торопиться. Например, на лес повесили name=усадьба Богородицкое. Лес называется "Усадьба Богородицкое, серьезно?"

Еще раз: в следующий раз такое пойдет под откат как poor mapping
NeisBot (2025-03-06 09:27:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was flagged because your added description contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam
pitscheplatsch (2025-03-06 17:17:43+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/163293754
eggie (2025-03-06 09:28:48+00:00): Dag Mart  Ook hier beter highway=path gebruiken footway is een officieel wandelpad G7 bord, maar hier mag je kennelijk niet komen.

MVG
eggie
MartReiling (2025-03-06 09:32:31+00:00): Ik heb het padtype niet aangepast, aan toegang.
MartReiling (2025-03-06 09:34:13+00:00): *alleen de toegang
eggie (2025-03-06 09:42:33+00:00): Klopt, maar ik screen gewoon algemeen en dan valt zoiets direct op.
Heb het aangepast naar pad.  Is het hier geen vrijwandelen op privegebied?
Dacht dat het hier opengesteld was. 
foot=permissive? 
Gr eggie
MartReiling (2025-03-06 09:51:04+00:00): Ik weet vrij zeker van niet, staat vgm een bord verboden toegang. maar ik kom er vanmiddag nog langs, zal het nog eens voor de zekerheid checken. Er zijn in elk geval in een heel jaar 0 strava passages geweest te voet en te fiets (heb toegang tot Strava Metro van heel Nederland); vrijwel altijd is het dan niet toegankelijk.
TrickyFoxy (2025-03-06 23:23:05+00:00): Что за имя вы пытались добавить зданию? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/81952161
eggie (2025-03-06 09:47:04+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback  In Nederland taggen we bedriven bij op de reeds bestaande adresnodes. Dus niet op de gebouwomtrek. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-03-06 09:52:10+00:00): Aangepast als bovenstaand. 
gr eggie
Marco Ubaghs (VRZL) (2025-03-07 15:47:14+00:00): Hallo eggie,

Op de kaart zie ik nog steeds 'de Kruidhof' staan. Zijn de wijzigingen pas na een paar dagen zichtbaar?

Gr. Marco
eggie (2025-03-07 16:04:58+00:00): Dag Marco,

Paar keer CTRL -F5   Cache leegmaken van je browser. .
Op nr 7a staat De Kuikenhof

MVG
eggie
rskedgell (2025-03-06 12:15:02+00:00): Hi,

The tactile_paving=yes tag has a different meaning on nodes and ways. On a way, it means that tactile paving exists for the full length of the way, which is *never* the case on a pedestrian crossing of a public highway anywhere in the UK.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tactile_paving#Use_on_ways

I've also undeleted w1322148795. Please do not delete objects which exist and have been added by other mappers.
NeisBot (2025-03-06 09:54:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was flagged because your added description contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2025-03-14 15:39:54+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/163615321
NeisReview (2025-03-14 15:40:31+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/163615356
Allison P (2025-03-06 17:00:56+00:00): I fixed your business entry to remove the spam, and you spam it again.
NeisReview (2025-03-06 17:05:23+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/163293871

Thanks @ Allison P !
eggie (2025-03-06 10:06:49+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback  Wellicht gewoon 40H  van maken. (Niet apart unit)
Dat is de format voor adressen in Nederland.
phone heb ik aangepast met +31 (format OSM) 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
pxlHolo (2025-03-06 10:30:19+00:00): Bedankt Eddie.
Ik heb je bericht gelezen en zal de wijzigingen doorvoeren.

Ik zal het in gedachten houden. 
:)
johsin18 (2025-03-09 09:13:24+00:00): Hallo dku3hn,
ich würde dir empfehlen, das Geschäft als eigenen Node innerhalb des Gebäudeumrisses (nicht als Tags auf dem Gebäude) einzutragen, z.B. als office=it.  Dann kannst du auch gleich noch passende suchbare Tags hinzufügen.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:office%3Dit
Gruß, johsin18
aharvey (2025-03-07 04:10:47+00:00): There is informal=yes for informal ways https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:informal%3Dyes however an informal highway=track seems lees likely than highway=path.

highway=track implies that it's physically usable by vehicles (might only be 4wd, or private maintainance workes, but at least someone could), so if that's the case here then that's fine.

I'd suggest to also tag access modes https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access

You said it's not blocked off, so maybe motor_vehicle=yes or permissive?
idk_ (2025-03-07 12:19:16+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163325067, I believe I've tagged it correctly based on all the information I know about it. I'm pretty sure it's just an access trail for the rail line, so motor_vehicle=permissive was used. Thanks
Đuro Jiří (2025-03-29 15:54:15+00:00): Ciao Dom61, sulle immagini satellitari si vede parcheggio per bus, visto che si trova vicino a scuola direi che per scuolabus,ora c'è parcheggio per le macchine?
opendcc (2025-04-02 16:45:29+00:00): reverted
TinPetreković (2025-03-06 10:21:45+00:00): Reverted certain way because the tags were changed wrongfully #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163279176
Herman Lee (2025-04-28 12:27:12+00:00): 此修改集已退回
MxxCon (2025-04-10 20:01:31+00:00): SEO spam reverted in full.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164785882
MrYodaylay (2025-03-06 10:31:00+00:00): See more here:
https://yoursay.northernbeaches.nsw.gov.au/improving-road-safety-south-creek-road-cromer
fortera_au (2025-03-08 07:43:24+00:00): Hi, information from a council's Your Say page is generally copyrighted, meaning we can't use it. Are you able to either confirm this in person, or using another source?
MrYodaylay (2025-03-08 14:29:44+00:00): Hi! I was speaking to some users on the Discord and was made aware of this.

I have visited this location in person and can confirm the mapping. 

What I have mapped doesn't exactly match the plans anyway, so I think we should be ok on the copyright front.

I probably shouldn't have listed it as a "source" as such, but more of a reference for anyone else who looks here and wonders why the mapping doesn't match aerial footage. 

I hope this is ok? I am still relatively new to contributing. 

Thanks for double checking and making sure everything is above boar though! Happy to make any other changes you think I need to.
MrYodaylay (2025-03-08 14:34:46+00:00): Also as a second question from me, I have mapped the segment in between the two roundabouts as two separate one way ways. I did this because the roundabouts are very close and it could be awkward to have the in and out lanes for each roundabout rejoin and then split again for the next roundabout. There is also a small concrete divider, for most but not all of the distance between the two roundabouts.

Do you think was a good way of mapping this?
eggie (2025-03-06 11:04:23+00:00): Dag Hiker,,

Dat lijkt me oke als je daar mag fietsen en lopen.
Die tags zijn overigens default =yes.
MVG
eggie
Grass-snake (2025-03-07 02:37:12+00:00): Спасибо за вклад, обратите внимание:
- лучше не сокращать названия, вместо "ул. Ленина" указывать "улица Ленина";
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#%D0%98%D0%BC%D1%8F_%E2%80%93_%D1%8D%D1%82%D0%BE_%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%B8_%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%BA%D0%BE
- иногда можно и посмотреть на разные спутниковые снимки: на Bing, который указан у Вас в источниках, ничего не видно, зато на Esri видно хорошо (многие здания нарисованы не совсем так, как Вы нарисовали).
ilias_ (2025-03-06 14:50:53+00:00): Hi Nona Mostafa, you removed the "covered=yes" tag from the service road in front of Four Seasons hotel, how come? I thought that was the way to map a covered part. Thank you for your collaboration.
ilias_ (2025-03-06 18:51:36+00:00): It now looks like the service road is going over the roof.
nona mostafa (2025-03-09 12:09:12+00:00): Hi ilias_
Thank you for reaching out
I removed the "covered=yes" tag from the service road in front of the Four Seasons hotel because this building is roof with layer=1
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1364921747#map=19/33.599352/-7.663613
According to
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building=roof
Regards,
nona mostafa
ilias_ (2025-03-09 14:42:50+00:00): Hi nona mostafa,
According to that same wiki, it says:
"The way should be tagged with covered=*."

And according to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer:

"Almost always layer=* on way ways should be used in combination with one of tunnel=*, bridge=*, highway=steps, highway=elevator, covered=* or indoor=yes."
So even if there's a roof, the covered part should be covered=yes.

Best regards
nona mostafa (2025-03-10 13:05:22+00:00): Hi ilias_,
Thank you for sharing the information, I fixed it
Regards,
nona mostafa
limes11 (2025-03-06 18:00:00+00:00): Hallo VRS-Auskunft,

vielen Dank für die Verbesserung der Topologie. 

Mir erscheint das Vorgehen allerdings Duplikate zu erzeugen. Es werden Knoten mit hw=bus_stop und public_transport=platform durch Flächen mit gleichen Tags und gleichem Namen ersetzt. 

Meines Erachtens sollten die Knoten zu den Flächen umgebaut werden, um Duplikate zu vermeiden. Zudem müssen die Flächen in die jeweiligen Relationen aufgenommen werden. 

Habt ihr Euch vorab die Vorgehensweise und das Tagging mit OSM-Experten geklärt ?

Viele Grüße
VRS-Auskunft (2025-03-07 11:38:32+00:00): Hallo limes11,

vielen Dank für Deinen Hinweis!

Unsere Herangehensweise orientiert sich aktuell an den Anforderungen unseres Routings, das auch OSM-Daten nutzt. Unser vorrangiges Ziel ist es, eine lückenlose Topologie zur Haltestelle über alle Zuwege sicherzustellen – insbesondere im Hinblick auf die Barrierefreiheit.

Die doppelte Erfassung werden wir korrigieren und stattdessen die Wartebereiche als Haltepunkt/Knoten aktuell direkt an die Topologie anbinden.

Wir prüfen in welchem Umfang wir die Knoten zu Flächen umwandeln können, sollte die Voraussetzung dahingehend gegeben sein und es sich um eine public_transport=platform handeln im Sinne des OSM-Schemas.

Viele Grüße
limes11 (2025-03-09 09:16:26+00:00): Hallo nochmal,

prinzipiell ist die Umwandlung des Knotens in eine Fläche auch mit ID möglich, wichtig ist dabei, den Knoten als Eckpunkt der Fläche zu behalten. Komplexer wird die Pflege der Busrouten- und Haltestellenrelationen. Meines Wissens stößt man hier an die Grenzen von ID. 

Ich würde Euch auch bitten, folgende Seite zu beachten:

https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

Insbesondere die Anlage einer Wiki-Seite mit Erläuterung des genauen Vorgehens ist relevant.

Beste Grüße

Limes
bxl-forever (2025-03-06 13:34:10+00:00): Hello.

I think there might be a problem with your local copy of Organic Maps because you uploaded the same data several times, forcing us to clean up the same error twice.

The node you changed (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8628542633) is the surveillance camery outside White Night.  This object has appropriate tags for a camera.  It should NOT get additional tags like "shop=*".  Those tags are for a separate node for White Night inside the building (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12640490865).  It was uploaded recently, maybe it is not yet visible in your local data.

The data is correct now, please don’t touch anymore.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-03-23 10:16:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163979213 where the changeset comment is: Following on from https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163963906 , and see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/about-mapping-features-with-computer-vision/127790 - reverting some 'AI detected swimming pools', some of dubious quality.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-03-23 10:16:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163979213 where the changeset comment is: Following on from https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163963906 , and see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/about-mapping-features-with-computer-vision/127790 - reverting some 'AI detected swimming pools', some of dubious quality.