piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Sparrow93 (2023-02-17 08:24:05+00:00): excuse me, could you tell me which tag (building:part=*) is suitable for the transition between buildings?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132623887
DWNR (2023-02-16 11:27:27+00:00): 1296 kHz Davao
Sree1922 (2023-02-16 11:40:41+00:00): MML Orthophoto
Domkot_Free (2023-02-20 07:52:28+00:00): Hello. The buildings shown duplicate existing ones. Check the data before editing and sending it to the server. This set of changes will be rolled back
DWNR (2023-02-16 11:54:10+00:00): Audiovisual Communicators Inc.
2ndb (2023-02-16 12:08:23+00:00): DA TE EBA
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-01-31 16:03:30+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10669516565

shop=burmese supermarket ? What kind of shop, if any is here? Is it intentionally used instead of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=supermarket ? If yes, what is the difference?

Should we document this shop value as distinct, valid and useful?  Or maybe it is so obvious duplicate that I should have replaced it with an automatic edit rather than making a note?

Maybe shop=supermarket cuisine=burmese would work well here?
DressyPear4 (2023-02-18 09:39:48+00:00): O que tinha de errado antes?
A geometria agora ficou pior e as faixas de pedestres estão desconectadas
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132625832
Vera_D (2023-02-20 10:21:45+00:00): Hello DressyPear4
Thank you very much for your comment. I revised my edit 132625832. You are right, the previous mapping is more appropriate. Changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132625832 has been reverted to https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132783190
---------------------------------
Olá DressyPear4
Muito obrigado pelo seu comentário. Eu revisei minha edição 132625832. Você está certo, o mapeamento anterior é mais apropriado. Changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132625832 foi revertido para https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132783190
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-08-22 10:40:37+00:00): Hello!

I have question about
name=Metroll
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10669522892

shop=warehouse ? Is it place renting small space for people to store their stuff? If yes then it is shop=storage_rental - or is it some other kind of place? Are they selling large areas or entire warehouse to companies? If yes then shop=* is a poor tagging. Or are they selling warehousing equiment?
TrickyFoxy (2023-03-19 11:24:04+00:00): 👋 У типов дорог немного другая логика https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Highway_classification

Не может внезапно на участке дороги возникнуть дорога уровня выше
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132626759
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2023-02-17 06:01:39+00:00): Hvilken barrier er det:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10669556289
DK7080BE (2023-02-17 11:00:56+00:00): Det er en midlertidig barriere. Skikballevej er for tiden spærret fra Brethparken og hertil. Vejen herfra og til Fælleshåbsvej bruges for tiden som servicevej til byggepladsen (plejehjemmet.) og til lodsejertrafik.  Det er vist planen at Skikballevej herfra og til Brethparken skal være en cykelsti.
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2023-02-17 11:08:54+00:00): Er det en bom, en låge, en sten.
Kan man gå forbi til fods.

Hvis den bruges af lodsejere så lyder det som en låge med access=private?
DK7080BE (2023-02-17 12:38:17+00:00): Cykelstien er spærret helt med cementblokke i hele bredden. Det er selve Skikballevej tæt ved Fælleshåbsvej som beboerne kan bruge. Cykel/gangstien skal fortsætte over mod det kommende plejehjem. Der er en midlertidig afspærring på Skikballevej lige sydvest for vejen Brethparken.
PT-53 (2023-02-17 07:24:56+00:00): Hallo deprado63,
könntest Du auch noch die Art des Recyclings angeben?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity=recycling?uselang=de

Danke und Grüße
PT-53 (2023-03-05 11:55:56+00:00): Hallo deprado63,
es wäre schön, wenn Du die fehlenden Angaben noch ergänzen würdest.
Grüße
PT-53 (2023-03-22 08:46:27+00:00): Unnützen Eintrag, weil unvollständig, gelöscht
Frans S (2023-03-06 15:34:08+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, during the validation process
I noticed that you are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.
We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. Just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.
Please map each building accurate over the rooflines.
Square each rectangular building with the Q key.
Nodes of buildings may NOT  connect to other buildings or features.
The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 
Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132627521
opendcc (2023-02-16 13:21:26+00:00): Ja, dürfte passen. Im wiki ist auch ein Bild dazu.
opendcc (2023-02-16 13:18:30+00:00): Hallo,

wenn Gras dominiert, dann grass. ground ist wenig spezifisch, kann auch lehmig, Fels, ... sein.
Hufkratzer (2023-02-16 23:04:21+00:00): Hello,
In the Esri imagery https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1146496775 looks more like a riding arena (leisure=pitch).
In the current JOSM version (18646) the preset for leisure=horse_riding has been improved a bit to reduce confusion, see
https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/22588
blajo (2023-02-17 09:15:32+00:00): You are right, changed to pitch.
Frans S (2023-03-09 15:50:25+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings hardly squared. Just 20 out of 168 squared.
Don't cluster buildings.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132628008
venkkrie (2023-03-10 09:36:03+00:00): Hello Frans,
Thank you for reviewing my changeset and providing your valuable suggestions.Going forward,I will ensure to be mindful. Thank you once again and looking forward to learn more from you.
Regards,
venkkrie
Frans S (2023-03-08 17:55:50+00:00): 
Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
Please don't spend time on mapping of traces leading to and ending in farmland (tracks and paths) Focus on through roads. (unclassified)
Please read the instructions about it.
emersonveenstra (2023-02-16 15:36:52+00:00): Hi,

You seem to have a typo on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1146508268, you have lanes=5, but you have lanes:backward=3, lanes:both_ways=1, and lanes:forward=2, which adds up to 6. Can you double check and fix this please? Thanks!
amakarevich_lyft (2023-02-17 07:35:14+00:00): Hi, emersonveenstra

My name is Artem, and I’m a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. Sorry for missing the lane tags mismatch. I have fixed the typo in this changeset - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132659819
Thank you for your contribution and valuable feedback!

Best regards, Artem
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-16 13:10:21+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8260408859
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/375571937

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-13 12:36:09+00:00): Hello!

You used
reservation=none
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10669764294/history

Have you maybe meant
reservation=no
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?
bxl-forever (2023-02-16 13:41:51+00:00): Hello,

I have been trying to contact you about your recent works to change the rendering of the map around Atomium.

Some changes are really puzzling.  It looks like you are doing this in the iD editor and validation errors keep popping up in this area.

Just one example with this building: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15484490
You cut it into two U-shapes, joined into a multipolygon.

"problem solved by cutting in parts", you say.

I plan to review this area in the next days but would you please be so kind and explain what you are trying to achieve here.  Is there a rendering problem with one particular app or layer? Or 3D mapping here? So that we can understand what you wanted to do, and help you.
gscholz (2023-02-28 08:12:12+00:00): Hi Evarist Isdory_ImportAccount,
your recent import activities have created several errors in the OSM database regarding not connected ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=34.37834&lat=-1.45876&zoom=10&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=132629317

As you may know, those kind of ways cannot be used by routing software. Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Samwel Kyando_Import Account (2023-03-01 08:18:53+00:00): Fixed
todama (2023-02-17 08:01:29+00:00): Japan GSI Standard Mapにて編集なされた池名を確認しようとしましたが、できませんでした。池名をどうやって知りましたか？参考にさせてください。
まりさめきりさ (2023-02-17 10:23:47+00:00): 「MAPPLEのベクトルタイル」を参照し、名称を記載しました。
https://labs.mapple.com/mapplevt.html#16.02/33.914317/133.268482
todama (2023-02-17 10:42:39+00:00): そのリンクの【利用規約】および「サイトの利用条件」をお読みになりましたか？著作権により保護されており、参照し入力すると違法になります。最悪OpenStreetMapが訴えられ多大な迷惑を与える恐れがありますので、参照データの削除をどうかお願いします。
まりさめきりさ (2023-02-17 13:22:02+00:00): 一部MAPPLEと差異はあるようですが、県庁の「えひめのため池」というページから閲覧できる、「ため池マップ」にも同様の池の名称が記載されています。こちらの記載に基づけば大丈夫ですか？
https://www.pref.ehime.jp/h35400/nouchibousai/ehime_tameike.html
todama (2023-02-17 14:08:51+00:00): どのような地図情報にも著作権があり、利用許諾の明示がない場合は難しい許可申請をしなければなりません。現在OpenStreetMapに許可されているのはBingや国土地理院などの画像のトレースやWikipedia記事であり、それ以外の情報は自分で足を運ぶしかありません。せっかく入力して頂いたのですが、他のマップから情報を持ってくることは普通できないことをご理解ください。
まりさめきりさ (2023-02-17 14:35:10+00:00): 了解です。池の場所は地理院地図のトレースなので、場所のみ残した状態で名称を削除いたします。
todama (2023-02-17 14:41:51+00:00): それでよいと思います。ご理解頂きありがとうございます。
user_8655426 (2023-02-18 00:42:37+00:00): こんにちは。
Wikipedia の記事は OpenStreetMap へコピーできません。

"Do not copy any information from Wikipedia into OSM. "
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Collaboration_with_Wikipedia

Available Data (Wikipedia = No)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Available_Data

OSMの編集に利用可能なデータソースと情報収集方法は、以下のページでご確認ください。

利用可能なデータソース
https://openstreetmap.jp/node/764

データの情報源
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Beginners_Guide_1.1
Tilia_J (2023-02-16 15:23:31+00:00): Goedemiddag,

Je aanpassing had nogal wat ongewenste effecten, andere tags die je toevoegde waren nietszeggend.

"oneway=no" geldt al impliciet voor alle wegen, toevoegen is overbodig.

"bycicle=yes" en "foot=yes" gelden al impliciet voor cycleways, toevoegen is overbodig.

"access=permissive" is van toepassing op particulier eigendom en niet op een openbaar fietspad (priveweg bij gedogen opengesteld door eigenaar). Maar tevens geldt die permissive voor alle types voertuigen die niet expliciet uitgesloten zijn. Dus op een aantal weggedeelten heb je de toegang juist wijdopen gezet voor toerincars, tanks, vrachtwagens, etc.

"access=no" zet de hele weg dicht voor alle verkeer en toont deze ook als zodanig op de kaart (grijs / fletsblauw)
Weliswaar zorgt "foot=yes" en "bicycle=yes" er weer voor dat die access=no overruled wordt, echter blijft de weg als afgesloten getoond.

Ik heb eea aangepast.
jodd (2023-07-18 19:58:45+00:00): Hallo theraser,

ich habe eine Frage zur neuen Radweg-Querung über die Friedrich-Ebert-Anlage [1], die du eingezeichnet hast. Meiner Meinung nach könnte die Querung deutlich einfacher gemappt werden. Meiner Meinung nach ist das hier teilweise Spurtagging (z.B. zum Teil eigene Wege für nur aufgemalte Radfahrstreifen). Dadurch entstehen auch mehr Ampeln, als es in der Realität gibt. Aufmerksam bin ich auf die Sache durch die meiner Meinung nach berechtigten Frage in einem Hinweis-Marker [2].

Wenn du nichts dagegen hast, würde ich die Querung etwas einfacher mappen. Möchte dich aber vorher zu deiner Ansicht fragen. Wie siehst du die Sache?

VG Jo

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=50.11101&mlon=8.65735#map=19/50.11101/8.65735&layers=N
[2] https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3606357
theraser (2023-07-23 18:54:21+00:00): Hi,

wenn es einfacher geht: gerne! Vermutlich geht es in Richtung Norden simpler, in Richtung Süden dürfte das denke ich schwer werden, wenn man die ziemlich ungewöhnliche Führungsform darstellen möchte. Aber wenn du Ideen hast, freue ich mich über Verbesserungen.

VG
jodd (2023-07-25 19:55:36+00:00): Hi, danke für die Rückmeldung. Ich nehme mir das mal für die nächsten Tage vor.
jodd (2023-07-26 20:06:04+00:00): Hallo nochmal,
ich habe es gewagt und habe meine Idee umgesetzt, siehe meine Änderungen in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139055276
Aus meiner Sicht ist so weiterhin alles Wesentliche gemappt.

@theraser: Ich habe mir Mühe gegeben, alle von dir gemappten Informationen zu erhalten, nur anders dargestellt. Wenn du etwas vermisst, gibt gerne Bescheid :-)
VG Jo
theraser (2023-07-27 15:09:12+00:00): Danke! Sieht insgesamt ganz aus, auch wenn ich generell eher ein Freund der separaten Erfassung bin (siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Berlin/Verkehrswende/Radwege#Stra%C3%9Fenbegleitende_Radwege_separat_erfassen_oder_nicht? ). Damit lässt sich auch indirektes Abbiegen usw. ordentlich abbilden, was so nicht möglich ist.

Ansonsten rätsel ich noch, wieso das Rechtsabbiegen in die Hohenstaufenstraße nicht mehr von Brouter unterstützt wird: https://bikerouter.de/#map=19/50.11081/8.65697/standard&lonlats=8.656781,50.111053;8.656849,50.110432&profile=ffmbb-long-distance-cycling

Und vermutlich war bei diesem Weg cycleway:right=lane und cycleway:left=no gemeint, oder? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/301727534
jodd (2023-08-02 19:36:32+00:00): Hallo theraser,

danke für das Feedback.

Für das Rechtsabbiegen in die Hohenstaufenstraße hat ein Verbindungsweg gefehlt, diesen habe ich nun eingetragen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1194076806

Die von dir genannten cycleway-tags habe ich korrigiert, danke für den Hinweis.

Zur separaten oder nicht separaten Erfassung von Radwegen: Den von dir verlinkten wiki-Beitrag zur Kartierung von Radwegen in Berlin verstehe ich so, dass man sich dort für das separate Eintragen von Radwegen ausspricht, wenn es eine gewisse bauliche Trennung gibt: 

"... selbst wenn sie baulich "nur" durch Bordsteine, parkende Autos oder evtl. Poller (siehe unten) von der Fahrbahn getrennt sind"

Ich habe alle von der Fahrbahn durch Bordsteine getrennten Radwege, die separat erfasst waren, auch so belassen. Nur Radwege, die OTG nur Radfahrstreifen sind, die also nur durch eine durchgezogene Linie von den Fahrstreifen getrennt sind, habe ich gelöscht und in den Hauptweg integriert. Für diese Erfassungsart spricht sich auch der Berliner Text aus: 

"Fahrradspur (Radfahrstreifen oder Schutzstreifen, mit Linien und Symbolen auf der Fahrbahn markierte Radspuren): Wenn nur Markierungen und keine weiteren Barrieren zur Fahrbahn bestehen, werden Fahrradspuren mit ihren Eigenschaften an der Straßenlinie erfasst: ..."

Oder habe ich vielleicht etwas übersehen? Dann wäre ich dankbar, wenn du mir die konkrete Stelle nennst. Oder wir haben uns nur missverstanden?

VG Jo
theraser (2023-08-05 18:42:21+00:00): Danke dir! Tatsächlich hatte ich es einfach falsch im Kopf und habe es vor lauter Gewohnheit falsch gemappt, von daher hat sich die Diskussion auf jeden Fall gelohnt :-) Sorry für die Verwirrung, passt alles so!
muralito (2023-02-16 17:40:58+00:00): Hi Vince. Thanks. The guidelines in OSM are that is a decision left to the renderer whether to abbreviate some words. It's straightforward to abbreviate, but no to revert it. If you are worried about the cluttering of the map, you can also use the tag short_name="René Favaloro", or "Favaloro", and each renderer can decide which string to use.

For example, if the renderer used speaks the name instead of drawing it, it's easy to speak and understand "Doctor", but if you send "Dr." to the speak engine you probably didn't understand what it says, unless it knows that it should expand "Dr." to "Doctor".

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Abbreviations
Hans Wurst (2023-04-01 19:17:24+00:00): Hallo chris66,
du hast auf dem Campingplatz in Goyatz dem Toilettenhäuschen die Hausnummer Teichsiedlung 100 vergeben. Auf welcher Grundlage? Ich weiß, dass der Verein Teichsiedlung Goyatz (teichsiedlung-goyatz.de) diese Adresse hat und dessen Briefkasten steht in der Nähe von Teichsiedlung 123a. Mit dem Campingplatz hat der Verein aber nichts zu tun. Insofern bin ich mir sicher, dass die Zuweisung der Adresse an das Toilettenhäuschen des Campingplatzes falsch ist.
chris66 (2023-04-02 07:09:00+00:00): Hi,
haste mal nen Link zu dem Objekt, kann es momentan nicht finden.

Generell nutze ich die BBG Layer des Landes Brandenburg zum mappen. 

Grüße
Chris
Hans Wurst (2023-04-02 07:19:18+00:00): Dahabe ich gestern Änderungen vorgenommen:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/changeset/134392755

Viele Grüße
Ingolf
SekeRob (2023-02-19 12:13:54+00:00): Hi

Quando si mappa un parcheggio sul ciglio della strada, gli indaco del tipo, ad es. parking=street_side e la modalità di parcheggio, ad es. orientation=parallel/diagonal/perpendicular

Vedi lo wiki per tutte le informazioni https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Street_parking non disponibile in Italiano

buona mappatura
Noen (2023-02-16 18:16:43+00:00): Hei! «foot=no» brukes der det er ulovlig å gå, ikke der det oppleves som farlig.
Taggen «verge=no» brukes for å indikere at det er umulig å gå lang en vei.
Tagger du partier igjennom skjæring med cutting=yes og partier på fylling embankment=yes, så er også årsaken åpenbar.
SomeoneElse (2023-07-22 16:31:02+00:00): Hello, is https://osm.mapki.com/history/way/961287358 still a clothes shop?  I'm guessing not...
spiregrain (2023-07-22 18:13:21+00:00): It's not - It's remains a clothes shop, or did last time I visited.  Too much copying and pasting on my part!
SomeoneElse (2023-07-22 18:20:33+00:00): Thanks - is the accountant upstairs or something?
spiregrain (2023-07-22 18:24:20+00:00): The accountant is next door to the north, I think I must have tried to copy the source:addr:housenumber from there and copied the office= too.
spiregrain (2023-07-22 18:27:02+00:00): The Mapillary imagery is about right, you can see the menswear shop and (if you squint a bit) the accountants next door.
mueschel (2023-02-17 09:38:25+00:00): Hi,
welcome to OSM!

I see you and your group added many tags like these:
Building Age = 50
Building material = concrete
Building type = Hall canteen
Earthquake vulnerability = moderate
Fire vulnerability = moderate
Firefighting Equipment = no
Number of entrance or exit = 1
Number of floors = 1
Number of staircase = 0
Staircase = no
Type of Staircase = no

These tags are not common in OSM and not used in any other place. 
In OSM we have to use a well-defined set of tags to allow all the software tools to understand the data and e.g. show it on maps. Also, our database in case sensitive, all keys have to be in lower case.
Please make sure that you only use tags that are documented in the Wiki or are available as presets in your editor.

In addition, please point the leader of this mapping effort to our organized editing guidelines:
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines
ianlopez1115 (2023-02-16 14:01:22+00:00): See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/29 for added information on this changeset
Frans S (2023-02-17 14:13:41+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. We welcome you as a new mapper.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings need some improvements.

Please pay attention to next points:
Each building need to be mapped individually, without connecting nodes to each other.
Your mappings are rather accurate, but not squared.
Each building need to be squared with the Q key when still selected.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132631123
MxxCon (2023-02-16 22:50:10+00:00): hello.
what do you mean by areas disappearing?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132631247
wolfgang8741 (2023-02-17 22:47:25+00:00): When zooming in and out the drawn shape would stop showing the lines or nodes of areas that had yet been assigned a type. Thus the change set showed "area" which I clicked to view, but ID integrated with task manager would zoom to a location, but no "area" would be displayed associated with the warning before submitting.
ianlopez1115 (2023-02-16 14:21:11+00:00): See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/29 for added information on this changeset
erickdeoliveiraleal (2024-03-21 16:30:28+00:00): não parece existir: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1146533154
Frans S (2023-02-27 14:58:28+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, during the validation process
I noticed that you are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.
We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.
Each rectangular building need to be squared. !! You hardly squared a building . Press the   Q key when still selected
Nodes of buildings may not connect to other buildings or features.
The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 
Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.





Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132631558
Frans S (2023-02-18 09:28:05+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this difficult task.
Mapping of tall (high) buildings.  

mapping of tall buildings differs from standard buildings. Because the imagery is taken at an angle, you see both the roof lines and also the side of a building. 
How do you map such a building?
Map over the roof lines and lastly slide the mapped building to the footprint.
Here is a video how that is done.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1V5-bADsYiffCD9bo6l64YOdTvmKqMGry/view?usp=share_link

Best regards.
habi (2023-02-25 21:21:05+00:00): Ciao Frans
Thanks for the note; I'm well aware of this.
Greetings from Switzerland,
habi
ianlopez1115 (2023-02-16 14:21:22+00:00): See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/29 for added information on this changeset
confusedbuffalo (2023-02-17 13:08:08+00:00): Thank you for deleting non-existent banks, however you have added some areas of farmland called "Land Bank", should this be more of a description?

Also, I can't really understand what you are doing based on your changeset description, it would be very helpful to improve that in future
ianlopez1115 (2023-02-16 14:21:28+00:00): See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/29 for added information on this changeset