piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-16 11:42:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184177657, 184177648, 184177681, 184177679, 184177677, 184177691, 184177627, 184177660, 184177591, 184177688, 184177670, 184177664, 184177695 where the changeset comment is: revert edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20792
Kees 59 (2026-05-31 13:29:40+00:00): Forgot the source (once again): PDOK aerial imagery Beeldmateriaal.nl 7,5cm (WMS) latest; BGT: BGT standaardvisualisatie
Baloo Uriza (2026-06-05 00:43:03+00:00): Not bad but you shouldn't remove water=pond when adding golf=water_hazard.   It's still a pond.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183445655
PBoydstun (2026-06-05 03:32:19+00:00): sorry, will change
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-16 11:42:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184177657, 184177648, 184177681, 184177679, 184177677, 184177691, 184177627, 184177660, 184177591, 184177688, 184177670, 184177664, 184177695 where the changeset comment is: revert edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20792
joost schouppe (2026-06-01 07:45:17+00:00): Bedankt voor de correctie!
Aangezien er geen bakker meer is, mag de naam ook weg. Wat we wel vaak nog doen, is die bewaren als old_name. Als iemand de bakker probeert op te zoeken, dan krijgt die wel nog de juiste locatie te zien, maar niet langer een bakker.
De omschrijving "pensioen" hoort niet echt in OSM thuis (dit had wel heel nuttig geweest in de omschrijving van je changeset), en zeker niet in de naam. De naam is echt enkel voor de naam zelf, zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-16 11:43:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184177657, 184177648, 184177681, 184177679, 184177677, 184177691, 184177627, 184177660, 184177591, 184177688, 184177670, 184177664, 184177695 where the changeset comment is: revert edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20792
Klenje (2026-05-31 13:56:53+00:00): restored node deleted node by mistake with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183450109
test0022012 (2026-05-31 13:55:04+00:00): why are you deleting my data? Please stop.
test0022012 (2026-05-31 13:55:09+00:00): why are you deleting my data? Please stop.
test0022012 (2026-05-31 13:55:15+00:00): why are you deleting my data? Please stop.
Martinligabue (2026-06-01 09:49:32+00:00): eliminato numero civico ancora esistente

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183488608
mueschel (2026-06-06 12:38:19+00:00): Hi,
these ways got a strange "source:source" tag that looks like a mistake. Could you check that?
JeroenvanderGun (2026-06-06 14:56:48+00:00): It's the source information included within the source.
rajdhani (2026-06-01 11:06:20+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: 183492260
ricaestevao (2026-05-31 14:02:17+00:00): Desculpe pelo erro, não editei em Ilhéus-BA/Mijn excuses voor de fout, ik had het niet aangepast Ilhéus-BA
OlasMapy (2026-05-31 14:13:48+00:00): Reverted
OlasMapy (2026-05-31 14:16:18+00:00): Ruckgangig gemacht
changeset/183450864
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-31 15:30:44+00:00): User has been blocked https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20739
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-16 11:42:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184177657, 184177648, 184177681, 184177679, 184177677, 184177691, 184177627, 184177660, 184177591, 184177688, 184177670, 184177664, 184177695 where the changeset comment is: revert edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20792
Saad chaoui (2026-06-05 08:30:46+00:00): لا تستخدم اللغة الأجنية ثم العربية، الأجدر هو إستخدام اللغات الوطنية أي العربية أولا ثم الأمازيغة، ولنقل إنك تريد إستخدام العربية ولغة أجنبة "مع أنني ضد هاذا" فل تضع العربية أولا ثم اللغة الأجنبية، لاتضع لغة البلد هي التي في الأسفل
Amguid (2026-06-05 13:39:57+00:00):   راك تخرط يا البهلول ! هاد الخليج معود تلت مرات، و البلاجا معودة زوج مراتtest0022012
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-16 11:42:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184177657, 184177648, 184177681, 184177679, 184177677, 184177691, 184177627, 184177660, 184177591, 184177688, 184177670, 184177664, 184177695 where the changeset comment is: revert edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20792
NorthCrab_upload (2026-05-31 17:56:58+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/295995794

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-16 11:42:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184177657, 184177648, 184177681, 184177679, 184177677, 184177691, 184177627, 184177660, 184177591, 184177688, 184177670, 184177664, 184177695 where the changeset comment is: revert edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20792
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-31 14:32:25+00:00): @OlasMapy Thanks !

Revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183450322
rajdhani (2026-06-01 07:02:09+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:183481060
Lê Tuấn Minh (2026-05-31 14:34:33+00:00): Đoạn đường Hồ Chí Minh này đang xây dựng, trước đây đoạn dân cư nhỏ, bao gồm cả đường đất như nói trên changeset bị đặt nhầm thành Đ.HCM. Đ.HCM chính thức là lộ trình sau khi thi công xong, không phải những đường dân cư nhỏ
Marek-M (2026-05-31 19:43:25+00:00): `amenity=bureau_de_change` means exactly `Kantor wymiany walut` in Polish, so you don't need to add generic name as name tag. I'm reversing your edit.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183464046
wombatmaper (2026-05-31 20:05:06+00:00): This looks like spam to me?
What is this website for a house?
Batistacavera (2026-06-17 22:18:37+00:00): Agree, definetly spam. Restoring.
NorthCrab_upload (2026-05-31 17:56:46+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2076090268
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/362245385

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
mavl (2026-06-01 13:49:24+00:00): Здравствуйте. Добавленная точка не имеет никаких тегов.
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-31 15:29:55+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183453341
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-31 15:30:14+00:00): User has been blocked https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20740
MappingMore (2026-06-01 11:05:32+00:00): Revert of  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183453266
A67-A67 (2026-06-01 16:46:44+00:00): Bedankt voor het toevoegen. Een paar tips:
- In Nederland taggen we bedrijven op de adresnodes, niet op de gebouwen.
- Een omschrijving als 'slachthuis' taggen we in de description-tag, niet voor in de name-tag voor de bedrijfsnaam.
- Een gebouw is geen landuse. Om aan te geven dat het een industrieel gebouw is, gebruiken we building=industrial, niet landuse=industrial.

Ik heb het een en ander verbeterd
Aethonatic (2026-05-31 19:43:56+00:00): Likely an issue with your cache, simply pressing Ctrl + F5 should make it show up.
MappingMore (2026-06-04 05:21:14+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset ID:183623790
Eifelkobold! (2026-06-15 22:31:47+00:00): Guten Abend exarkun,

mir ist aufgefallen, dass du in diesem Änderungssatz street:name:=* von den Fußwegen entfernt hast. Für mich sah dies korrekt aus. Was ist der Grund dafür?

viele Grüße

Eifelkobold
Fizzie-DWG (2026-07-19 06:24:07+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185990948
Go Listen Live (2026-05-31 16:03:44+00:00): reference: https://www.instagram.com/themeantimebar/
itineris (2026-06-09 20:17:19+00:00): Szia!

Mielőtt más légifelvételre húzogatnál már pontosított dolgokat, kérlek, előtte igazítsd az eltolásod a legújabb FÖMI ortofotókhoz!

Köszönöm:
Ákos
kubahahaha (2026-06-01 12:32:40+00:00): A tutaj nie powinno być też skasowane?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13435255067
maraf24 (2026-06-01 12:56:22+00:00): Te dystrybutor były włączone.
maraf24 (2026-06-01 12:56:38+00:00): *dystrybutory
vsandre (2026-06-18 08:56:16+00:00): Ist das beabsichtigt, dass die Straße eine Adresse bekommen hat?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/113730102
Sieht für mich nicht passend aus.
wermak (2026-06-18 13:08:48+00:00): Adresse entfernt.
Danke.
geo-d (2026-05-31 16:22:11+00:00): Ergänzung: weitere Bildquelle Esri Luftbilder
kamilbogacki (2026-06-01 11:26:44+00:00): Budynki nadal do poprawy. Jeśli chodzi o landuse, to jest dodawane bardzo uznaniowo. To że w kamienicy znajduje się sklep/restauracja nie znaczy, że jej teren powinien być oznaczony jak teren handlowy.  Miałem zabrać się za kompleksową poprawę starówki, teraz to tylko więcej pracy.
Zwyklak (2026-06-11 21:26:06+00:00): Niektóre budynki pełnią funkcję niemieszkalne, np, Świętego Jana 1-3 to Szkoła Policealna Medyczna, Szeroka 35 to sklep odzieżowy i to nie jest lokal tylko na parterze, Rabiańska 11 to hotel Czarna Róża, Żeglarska 8 to Teatr Muzyczny, Piastowska 7 to Sąd, Rabiańska 9 to Muzeum, Mostowa 1 to Karczma Spichrz, Ciasna 9 to przemysłowy, Dwór Artusa na Rynku Staromiejskim 6 to nie ma tam mieszkań, Rynek Staromiejski 36 to Dom Towarowy, Mikołaja Kopernika 4 to biurowiec, między Szczytną, a Starym Rynkiem jest cukiernia Lenkiewicz, który jest między kamienicami, z kolei Podmurna 63 to śmieszny niski budynek handlowo-usługowy,  Strumykowa 4 to muzeum piernika, Sukiennicza 7 to biurowiec, na Szpitalnej są hotele, Piernikowa 4 to biurowiec, Świętego Jakuba 20 to Krajowa Informacja Skarbowa, kurcze dużo tu budynków, które nie pełnią funkcji mieszkalnej, dziękuję warstwie Geoportal budynki wraz z przeznaczeniem budynków, z której danych można korzystać w OSM, gdyż w edytorze ID tym przeglądarkowym jest dołączony, a zasięg terenów z warstwy działki
Baloo Uriza (2026-06-05 00:47:49+00:00): Looks like you might have mapped a terrace of five buildings as one single large building, which is likely not right.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183457480
BHSPitMonkey (2026-06-07 05:59:41+00:00): Fixed: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183764375
tux67 (2026-06-01 06:55:38+00:00): Hi, solltest du dann nicht auch konsequenterweise die Adress Nodes an diesen Straßen anpassen? 

Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183457603
vanagaudi (2026-06-02 01:12:58+00:00): Ja, so ist es. Außerdem fehlt überall der erste Bindestrich im Namen: "St.Michael-Straße"
lyctkel (2026-06-01 14:57:48+00:00): Hi asloma,

At https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13899246460 you added an new recycling container for glass bottles.
Do you remember if the colors of the glass were collected separately?

There is a widely used standard for the different glass colours: recycling:glass_bottles:colour. 
Although it isn't in the wiki, there was a lengthy discussion about it 
(see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/rfc-tagging-glass-recycling/101011).

The colors (brown, clear, colored, green, and mixed) are listed alphabetically, separated by semicolons.
Examples can be found here: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/recycling%3Aglass_bottles%3Acolour#values

Best regards,

lyctkel
teeuwen (2026-06-01 17:35:44+00:00): I've added the tag in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183511117. I'll be sure to add it to other glass recycling containers when I come across them in the future.
lyctkel (2026-06-02 10:35:09+00:00): Hi asloma,
Great!
Best regards,
lyctkel
vasony (2026-06-04 17:56:29+00:00): Szia!

Visszaírtam, a név felmérésen alapult. 

Tamás
totya (2026-06-04 20:25:47+00:00): Szia!

Mit jelent az, hogy felmérés? Az utcatáblát?

Balatonkenese Térinformatikai Rendszerében (ami most épp nem működik, de pár napja még ott volt) ez az utca Vízmű köz néven fut.
https://balatonkenese.intermap.hu/

Az önkormányzat Ingatlanvagyon-Kataszterében is szerepel Vízmű köz (12. oldal) és nincs rá semmilyen utalás, hogy máshol lenne.
https://www.balatonkenese.hu/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Vagyonrendelet-B-mell%C3%A9klet.pdf

Üdv,
Tamás
totya (2026-06-04 20:55:08+00:00): Kicsit még kutattam és újabb önkormányzati dokumentumokban az a helyrajzi szám tényleg Soós-hegy utcaként szerepel, szóval mégis az lehet az igazság.

Üdv,
Tamás
vasony (2026-06-05 04:58:33+00:00): Szia!

Pontosan, utcatábla.
Szépek a térinformatikai rendszerek, de végül az számít mi van kint

De ettől függetlenül volt egy utcanév felülvizsgálat 2023 végén (318/2013 határozat), ahol hrsz szerint jó pár utcanevet pontosítottak, és ezek után a táblákat is helyre tették.

Az érintett utca:
Soós-hegy utca 	448/17; 448/5; 454

Az érintett szakasz a 448/5

Tamás
flohoff (2026-05-31 19:13:42+00:00): Moin.

guck hier nochmal - zone:traffic hast du hier auf DE:zone30 umgetagged. Zone:traffic ist aber lediglich die markierung von inner/-ausserorts - kennt also nur DE:urban respektive DE:rural.

Für die quelle des maxspeeds gibts source:maxspeed oder maxspeed:type (letzteres von StreetComplete als defakto standard durchgesetzt)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/16577173
JuanCarlos80 (2026-06-01 18:17:41+00:00): Danke fürs Zeigen. Ich habe es entsprechend https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=DE:Tag:bicycle_road%3Dyes&uselang=de angepasst.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183458053
silversurfer83 (2026-06-01 20:23:41+00:00): Hi,

wenn die Breite stimmt hättest du sie gerne korrekt schreiben können.

Grüße :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183458558
Kamil Kalata (2026-05-31 17:42:30+00:00): Hello!
Why do you think that Aleja 700-lecia Torunia between Jana Dekerta and Czerwona Droga shouldn't be highway=secondary? It connects more important roads in simpler way than Szosa Chełmińska does. Please note that this isn't the first time you changed the category and the first time you did so was here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182149106. Moreover, you haven't described the reason in both changes.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-06-01 10:34:12+00:00): Also, please read and follow https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
NorthCrab_upload (2026-05-31 17:56:48+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10921991565
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10921991566
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13899443318
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11080758341
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1524926862
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1133325266
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1133325267
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1328219468

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10979118966

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1228469155
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1524926864

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
StC (2026-06-04 07:28:23+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre qui passe par là. Je m'occupe de la réparation.
bxl-forever (2026-05-31 19:43:21+00:00): Hello,

I wish there was a nicer way to welcome you but this message is to inform you that this changeset has been reverted.

This restaurant you added here (La taverne de Zorro) is already in the database here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2451989333

It was added several days ago but it looks like your "CoMaps" app is using outdated data.  Please only edit against french data to avoid doing such mistakes.

You also added an address point for house number 34 (or you wanted to add an address to the restaurant); also, the address here is already on the map.  Please make sure to never add duplicate information, it is not a good idea, we work hard to keep a clean dataset.

Thanks.
bxl-forever (2026-06-01 02:13:15+00:00): *autocorrect fix, sorry:
"La taverne de Zhao" is the correct name of the restaurant
+ Fresh data is required, but I am afraid this is not possible with CoMaps. This is the reason why we prefer that people do not use CoMaps to _edit_ OpenStreetMap, it is just too risky.
Thanks.
Baloo Uriza (2026-06-05 00:49:57+00:00): Looks like several terraces of buildings along Main Street got mapped as single giant buildings if you're willing to take a crack at terracing them out.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183459412
BHSPitMonkey (2026-06-07 05:52:03+00:00): I tweaked the extents of some of those buildings to better match the imagery or make room for sidewalks, but I didn't create them. Someone with better local knowledge can certainly try subdividing them where appropriate!
NorthCrab_upload (2026-05-31 17:57:05+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1524931037

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
mavl (2026-06-07 06:01:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183764451, 183764460, 183764431, 183764453, 183764448, 183764459, 183764455 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20768].
ollphéist (2026-07-19 10:09:17+00:00): Hi Thosewhoknow,

I realise these places can be defined as villages easily but they are also defined as towns by the Census of Ireland:
https://visual.cso.ie/?body=entity/ima/cop/2022&boundary=C04160V04929

Given their isolation to any other village or town, it seems appropriate to define them as town such that they appear on the map on a lower zoom level.
plamen (2026-06-02 18:30:47+00:00): E 871 Sofia - Kjustendil - Kumanovo
not till Burgas
see: https://unece.org/DAM/trans/doc/2016/sc1/ECE-TRANS-SC1-2016-03-Rev1e.pdf
foreigner037 (2026-06-02 18:33:51+00:00): Здравей,

това в каква връзка?
plamen (2026-06-02 18:48:24+00:00): Видях последно си правил по този път корекции. Мисля да го махна това Е871 от кръстовището на Цар Борис III с Южната дъга до Бургас. Там свършва маркировката на Гугъл. Табели последно има на ПВ Даскалово.
foreigner037 (2026-06-02 18:53:09+00:00): Правил съм нещо съвсем друго в Сопот, но разбрах идеята ти. Не знаех, че пътят не продължава до Бургас. Интересно как толкова години никой не се е усетил.
plamen (2026-06-02 19:35:18+00:00): Май е бил така маркиран. Може би погрешно. https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=42.70594965212263&lng=23.518454551705418&z=18.804172290146546&pKey=137431621776421&focus=photo
foreigner037 (2026-06-02 19:48:51+00:00): И аз от години знам че свършва в Бургас, но в Уикипедия пише, че дори под стария номер е свършвал (всъщност започвал?) в София. Прегледах няколко табели в участъка София - Бургас, мисля че само тази табела е сгрешена. Гугъл обаче го маркира с E871. Най-вероятно наистина свършва/започва в София.
foreigner037 (2026-06-02 19:53:57+00:00): В интерес на истината табелите след Сливен започват да пишат и E 773, но това отдавна вече не е вярно, не знам защо не е обновено в споразуменията. Е 773 е отклонение от Е 80 и действително преди е започвал в Поповица, тъй като и Е 80 е минавал от там в посока Капитан Андреево. От вече години Е 80 минава през Тракия и Марица, което би трябвало да смени трасето и на Е 773 до каквото е в момента в OSM.
plamen (2026-06-03 06:55:12+00:00): За България - нормално. Някой е решил, че целият I-6 ще е Европейски. В миналото, преди АМ Тракия, си беше доста натоварен. Дори министърът - https://www.parliament.bg/pub/PK/145518%D0%BE%D1%82%D0%B3%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BE%D1%80454-06-88.pdf
Но са пропуснали да го съгласуват с който ги пише тия работи - https://unece.org/transport/list-united-nations-transport-legal-instruments. 
Мисля, че е редно да го махнем от картата. Т.е. да остане само Куманово-София.
foreigner037 (2026-06-03 07:24:52+00:00): Това ясно. Ейсега ще го оправя.
czubi (2026-06-03 14:22:45+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1524556202#map=17/50.538206/11.211977&layers=N

was sind das hier für Überbleibsel?
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-07-10 10:31:24+00:00): zerkniesz na https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5383008 ?
HellMap (2026-06-05 10:25:12+00:00): Sveiki,

Vai šeit ir jauna zīme uzstādīta? Kā tieši ir "atļauta" kustība abos virzienos? Iepriekš šeit bija tikai 301. zīme.
HellMap (2026-06-05 10:32:51+00:00): Varētu lūdzu precizēt, kā tieši izpaužās bicycle_road=yes? Kādas zīmes šeit ir uzstādītas? Latvijā tādu terminu CSN nav, bet OSM tas tad nozīmētu, ka šeit ar mehānisko transportu vispār nedrīkst un jāliek attiecīgi access tegi.
Glassman (2026-06-01 20:43:38+00:00): Check out the Mapbox or ESRI World imagery for more current views. They can be found under the layers icon in the editor.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183461046
Wildsharky (2026-06-02 11:44:49+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:183486798
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-16 11:42:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184177657, 184177648, 184177681, 184177679, 184177677, 184177691, 184177627, 184177660, 184177591, 184177688, 184177670, 184177664, 184177695 where the changeset comment is: revert edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20792
wireguy (2026-06-04 16:50:24+00:00): Max, welcome to osm.  Thank for adding the addresses.  The shapes are a bit rough.  Tip,  click close to the corners, then use the shortcut key Q to square them up for you.   Looks much nice.   Keep mapping!
colons (2026-06-01 17:42:32+00:00): confused about this one. what is this bridge?
colons (2026-06-01 17:49:52+00:00): oh! you removed it. okay
LordGarySugar (2026-06-01 23:44:13+00:00): OSM is only for mapping real features, please do not add fictional bridges. I have reverted all three changesets because they damaged the ferry routes and port at Ballycastle.
streckenkundler (2026-05-31 20:34:19+00:00): Hei,

ich hab mal neugierigerweise eine technische Frage... Dieses CS ist markiert mit "created_by=Hydranten-Erfasser 1.0" Was ist denn das? Unter https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:created%20by?uselang=de ist das nicht gelistet... 
Sowas wie http://openfiremap.org/?zoom=12&lat=51.93861&lon=13.95241&layers=B0000TF oder https://waldbrand-app.de/mapcomplete/waldbrand.html?z=16&lat=52.09204&lon=13.72536&tab=3# oder https://www.osmhydrant.org/de/#zoom=13&lat=51.9373&lon=13.9171  ist es auch nicht...

Danke, streckenkundler
zepelindererste (2026-06-01 18:04:10+00:00): Hallo,
Klar gern. Das ist eine Eigenentwicklung, da die von dir genannten Tools entweder nicht mehr gepflegt werden, nicht mehr funktionieren oder einfach unpraktisch zum füllen sind.
streckenkundler (2026-06-01 19:12:55+00:00): Hei,

Vielen Dank für deine Antwort! Hast du Lust, das in unserem Forum vorzustellen? https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/de/56

Das wäre auch für andere durchaus sehr hilfreich, denn beim Hydranten-Thema sehe ich gelegentlich Interessierte... Auch fürs Wiki und der Nachvollziehbarkeit für Dritte ist das sehr hilfreich...

Danke und viele Grüße,

Sven