piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
A67-A67 (2025-12-23 16:06:43+00:00): In deze wijziging wordt het merk Jumbo Foodmarkt foutief aangepast naar de normale Jumbo. Dit is niet correct en heb ik teruggedraaid.
hellflower (2025-12-23 16:25:08+00:00): Thank you!
Anil Basnet (2025-11-12 17:09:33+00:00): duplicated landuse
Glassman (2025-11-09 22:14:33+00:00): Looks like you acidentially dragged a node of Malaga Avenue. Please be careful when editing.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174382294
Glassman (2025-11-09 22:14:50+00:00): Fixed street
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174382294
AndyB_66 (2025-11-08 15:47:54+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
infeeeee (2025-11-21 19:17:57+00:00): Hello! Welcome to OpenStreetMap!

It's forbidden to copy from Google, more info in the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google

Your changesets were reverted: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174962340

---

Szia! Üdv az OpenStreetMapen!

Sajnos semmilyen Google-höz köthető forrásból nem vehetünk át adatokat, bővebben itt: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google

Módosításaidat ezért sajnos vissza kell vonnom itt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174962340

Ha kérdésed merülne fel, a magyar szerkesztő közösség elérhetőségeit megtalálod ezen az oldalon: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hungary/Közösség#Elérhetőségek

További jó térképezést!
eggie (2025-11-08 16:24:41+00:00): Dat zou best een pad kunnen zijn, maar zo te zien informal=yes kan er bij (olifantenpad)  

De niet gedefinieerde routerelatie heb ik verwijderd.
Wat zou dit dan voor een route moeten zijn?

MVG
eggie
AndyB_66 (2025-11-08 15:50:40+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
Baloo Uriza (2025-11-08 16:54:09+00:00): shop = vacant is the key for empty shops.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174382876
eggie (2025-11-08 16:20:42+00:00): Dag Joey.. Zo is het inderdaad beter.
Ik heb nog wel moped en mofa=yes bij getagd, want dat zijn motorvoertuigen in OSM.
Verder was het westelijk deel van de straat een opgeplakte weg. (duplicated ways)  Die heb ik verwijderd.
Dat is dat gele gedeelte
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=174346346

MVG
eggie
grzegorz75jan (2025-11-08 16:48:07+00:00): Thanks for removing this.

I think this user likes to do mindless imports without verification and doesn't respond to comments.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174383181
Fraxi (2025-11-08 16:37:54+00:00): 10x :D
Rodrigo Rega (2025-11-08 16:17:48+00:00): Note #5039626.
eggie (2025-11-08 16:39:46+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback Het grote vlak is al de leisure = marina.
Dan is het niet correct om elke box een leisure=marina te taggen.
'k Denk voor boxnummers beter ref te gebruiken.

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Magnus_Redknapp (2025-11-09 10:01:39+00:00): Bedankt voor de tip, ik ga het aanpassen :-)
eggie (2025-11-09 10:32:05+00:00): Je zou ook even kunnen kijken naar mooring=yes als vlak.
Udarian (2025-11-08 18:56:40+00:00): thank you for doing this, I was going to run this over Miami Dade County in the near future anyways as I have been wanting something like this for some time now. I have one small nitpick though, next time in the changeset comment can you please put the state or area you ran this over so its easier to tell what this is when looking at the history view zoomed in to the county or city level, understand if you don't want to, but I would find that very useful if this is ran again in Fl in the future. Again I am grateful that you ran this over Fl (well at least Miami Dade County).

Happy Mapping,
Udar.
confusedbuffalo (2025-11-09 05:04:54+00:00): Hi

Sure, I should have added the area I was doing it for, I'll make sure I do that in future.
literan (2025-11-09 10:35:37+00:00): улица называется не так (не такой порядок слов). Исправьте, пожалуйста (посмотрите на самой линии улицы как она правильно называется)
Ozon OSM18 (2025-11-09 17:03:55+00:00): Исправила
TrickyFoxy (2025-11-09 17:57:03+00:00): 👋  Пожалуйста, будьте аккуратнее. Вы случайно перемещаете точки зданий и дорог и они начинают пересекаться и самопересекаться
mueschel (2025-11-10 11:01:37+00:00): Hi,
these charging points deliver up to 400 kW on a single socket, but only 400 kW combined if both are in use?
This tagging is already in use for this:

charge_point:output = 400 kW
socket:type2_combo:output = 400 kW
daganzdaanda (2025-12-17 22:28:41+00:00): Hallo themnn, willkommen bei OpenStreetMap!

Du hast angeklickt, dass jemand deine Änderungen anschauen soll - das hab ich bei einigen gemacht. Alles gut soweit, danke!

Hier hast du bei der Staatsstraße an ein paar Stücken maxspeed=70 gesetzt. Es gab aber z.B. bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/68456695 schon maxspeed:backward=80 und maxspeed:forward=100. Diese Tags werden benutzt, wenn es verschiedene Geschwindigkeitsbegrenzungen je nach Richtung gibt. Das forward/backward bezieht sich hier auf die Richtung des ways in OSM. Die Richtung des ways wird im Editor durch kleine Dreiecke dargestellt. Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:maxspeed#Unterschiede_nach_Fahrtrichtung und https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Forward_%26_backward,_left_%26_right

Ich glaube, um das im iD Editor zu sehen, musst du auf der linken Seite die "Eigenschaften" ausklappen. Dort kannst du dann auch "per Hand" neue maxspeed:forward/backward eingeben, anders geht das in iD noch nicht (glaube ich).

Magst du hier nochmal drüberschauen? Ich vermute (ohne Ortskenntnis) die 70 gelten dort, wo vorher 80 waren? Und die 100 in die andere Richtung stimmt noch? Dann müsste maxspeed=70 gelöscht werden, und die 80 zu 70 gemacht werden. Oder gilt jetzt in beide Richtungen 70? Dann müssten die maxspeed:fw/bw tags gelöscht werden, und maxspeed=70 wäre korrekt.

Wenn du noch Fragen hast, gern hier drunter, oder per PM. Ansonsten empfehle ich auch das Forum: https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/de/56/ 

Danke, dass du OSM vor Ort verbesserst! Weiter fröhliches Mappen :-)
daganzdaanda
tux67 (2025-11-09 09:49:33+00:00): Hi - an den Kreuzungen Schulstraße und Brabanter Straße mit Erkelenzer Straße sehe ich schon Markierungen auf dem Luftbild .. oder hat sich da was geändert?
The Invisible Freak (2025-11-09 11:01:16+00:00): Es kann sein, dass ich die Abfragen manchmal falsch weggeklickt habe. Nein, es hat sich nichts geändert.
eggie (2025-12-07 14:26:51+00:00): nama= Betonnen palen Wollenweversbuurt??????
Het is al weer aangepast
Good practice   
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Good_practice

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-12-07 14:28:01+00:00): Probeer eens te reageren op opmerkingen zodat je minder fouten gaat maken.
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=18421285

MVG
eggie
user_5359 (2025-11-10 09:41:56+00:00): Hello (again)! Please have alook on https://www.osm.org/node/13195610684. What is the mean of the tag NJ92NE0042 = NJ92NE0042?
tagishsimon (2025-11-17 11:47:36+00:00): It's the Aberdeenshire Historic Environment Record record ID for this bridge & its plaques. https://online.aberdeenshire.gov.uk/smrpub/master/detail.aspx?refno=NJ92NE0042
notmyproblem1 (2025-12-28 12:05:48+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1448444639/history#map=19/44.265489/-88.536648 

did you do a survey? can't see nothing from latest imagery (esri)
NeisBot (2025-11-08 16:51:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisBot (2025-11-08 16:51:44+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Rooftop restaurant with Mediterranean cuisine near Lady Bird Lake"
NeisReview (2025-11-08 21:18:23+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/174394906
Lordmadrax (2025-11-08 22:22:52+00:00): Thanks, will resubmit with neutral wording. Took that verbatim from their site, so assumed (incorrectly) that it was ok. Appreciate the quick turn around (maybe a bit too quick to revert over a weekend IMO) but will submit again!
user_5359 (2025-11-12 14:18:14+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:award:michelin for better description of the award.
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2025-11-09 11:33:13+00:00): viva, podes explicar s remoção dos logradouros do edifício?
Hinojal (2025-11-09 13:08:39+00:00): Boas! Estou a fazer o indoor mapping da universidade e o mapeamento é assim mais fácil (algumas dessas zonas são salas de estudo). É um mapeamento grande, não perguntei antes por ter já mapeado alguns shoppings no interior, mas estou a fazer mudanças em changesets individuais (incluindo este) se for preciso fazer revert. O quê achas?
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2025-11-09 13:16:39+00:00): a questão aqui é que se perdeu a relação dos logradouros. não me parece que o indoor mapping, seja incompatível com os logradouros.
Hinojal (2025-11-09 13:33:39+00:00): Fiz porque pensei que seria mais fácil mapear sem eles mas certo, é uma questão do editor, não do indoor mapping. Sorry. Já reverti o changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174417167. Já estão os logradouros outra vez com a sua história e a relation da uni. Ficou bem?
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2025-11-09 14:19:02+00:00): tudo ok. curiosidade, tás a fazer o indoor com o JOSM ou https://osminedit.pavie.info/#20/32.65922/-16.92423/0
Hinojal (2025-11-09 14:29:53+00:00): Com o JOSM, junto com o plugin PicLayer para pôr os planos de emergência numa camada em baixo dos dados. É bastante confuso na mesma mas o JOSM tem pelo menos aquela seleção de "level". Já ouvi falar daquele editor mas nunca usei, é bom? Btw posso partilhar as fotos dos planos se tens interesse em mapear o indoor.
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2025-11-09 19:43:01+00:00): O osinedit é simples, upload da planta e mapeias por piso
Hinojal (2025-11-09 20:11:59+00:00): Vou testar, obrigado 👍
Glassman (2025-11-08 21:24:58+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174385620
Glassman (2025-11-08 21:25:14+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174385839
notmyproblem1 (2025-11-16 09:58:51+00:00): Ciao caro, mi tocca revertare il tuo changeset, da un survey fatto da me, appare che dove c'è la footway ora, c'è una scalinata, e dove hai taggato come scalinata c'è una footway,


Posso revertarlo? grz
giulcenc (2025-11-16 12:09:27+00:00): OK fai pure.
notmyproblem1 (2025-11-17 22:06:16+00:00): Contattato utente, spiegato che prima c'è la footway poi la scalinata e non al contrario

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174793921
notmyproblem1 (2025-11-17 22:06:43+00:00): Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174793921
Dimitar155 (2025-11-08 20:55:56+00:00): Не е нужно да добавяш ръчно видовете отпадъци. Направил съм скрипт, който автоматично добавя необходимите тагове и маха ненужните. Необходимо е само да има отбелязан оператор и брой от всеки цвят. Може да видиш какво е направил в тази промяна - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174320558.
Fraxi (2025-11-08 21:52:32+00:00): А, ОК!
Fraxi (2025-11-08 21:56:24+00:00): Между другото, в тази връзка, да сложа ли оператор на онези в ОК - "Столична община"? Знаеш какво дискутирахме, а тези, които тези дни отбелязвах, оставих без operator, но мисля, че са общински.
Fraxi (2025-11-08 21:58:05+00:00): Сори, че тук попитах. Ако искаш, отговори на PM
Dimitar155 (2025-11-09 16:27:06+00:00): Може, но добави и някакъв note/fixme/нещо друго, за да може да се промени лесно в бъдеще, ако се наложи. Иначе ще се омешат с зелените острови, на които сложих оператор=Столична община.
Fraxi (2025-11-09 17:29:44+00:00): Тези в Овча Купел още не съм ги пипнал. Но за тези в Южния парк(само 2 са там) добавих оператор "Столична община". Виж и бележката
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11928814204
Решение ли да се добави шаблон в NSI както за детските градини и училищата?
Dimitar155 (2025-11-09 20:08:09+00:00): Не съм убеден че е решение. По принцип информацията за това че дадено нещо е по европроект е задължително да е видима на съответния обект.

Например лепенките че трамваите Pesa Swing са купени по европрограма още си стоят (https://trinmo.org/public-transport/gallery/18591 между първа и втора врата, както и между последните две врати). От доставката на най-старите са минали 11-12 години.

В този контекст, всичко написано върху лепенките на тези контейнери вероятно е било актуално, но е възможно вече да не е. Например за Южния парк пише че Екопак има 5 сини, 7 жълти и 6 зелени контейнера, като в това число не влизат контейнерите за PET бутилки и локациите, които са непосредствено до обграждащите го улици. Зачислени са към район Триадица, ако погледнеш сайта на инспектората.
Fraxi (2025-11-09 20:34:28+00:00): Видях. ОК, махам оператора. Иначе обсъжданите контейнери(като изключим лепенката за информацията за проекта и логото на ЕС) наглед са същите като зелените острови в Овча купел, както и контейнери, на които просто няма надпис "Екопак". Това, че може вече да се обслужват от тази компания, е друго.
Dawid2849 (2025-11-08 20:00:48+00:00): Niektóre fragmenty wyglądają na gotowe, ale nie są. Droga jest wciąż w budowie
LordGarySugar (2026-05-21 00:33:21+00:00): Hi, I've had to remove a lot of the tracks you'd mapped in farmland around here, as these are tramlines for planting and spraying crops, they are liable to change frequently. As the layout can change, we shouldn't map them. Please also take care to ensure the connectivity of footpaths, where you deleted and redrew https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1448448829 it was tagged as a private track where it connects to Green Lane - disrupting pedestrian routing. If you have any questions or need any help, please feel free to ask.
mueschel (2025-11-10 11:05:40+00:00): Hi,
what does 'situacao = Despejada' mean? This tag isn't used in any other place.
vichada (2025-11-08 17:33:35+00:00): Sorry, wrong changeset comment.
Should be: 
gnss (rtk/sapos), bicycle, survey
BCNorwich (2025-11-09 07:45:38+00:00): Hi, the following stated highways all had duplicated sections, five warnings were given above about this problem. Duplicating sections of highways will disrupt routing and should be avoided. I've removed the duplicated sections.
Way: 1448453646, Way: 1448453657, Way: 1448453648, Way: 407920854, Way: 314988752

Uploading changesets that involve so many (142) feature edits means that you nor anyone else can easily see any problems. It's best to limit changesets to 20 or less edited features. Thus you can more easily see any mistakes.

Regards Bernard.
eggie (2025-11-08 18:11:46+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback Wanneer het echt een bebord woonerf is dan geldt er een wettelijke snelheid van 15km en geen 5.
Staat er wel een bord woonerf?
Al die accesstags zijn niet nodig. Waarom horse=no Geldt er een ruiterverbod?
Verder heb je twee brandgangen verwijderd, maar die zijn er toch gewoon.
Ergens anders in Delft heb je een bos vastgeplakt aan een fietspad.

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-11-08 18:15:39+00:00): Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=174387862
eggie (2025-11-08 19:07:07+00:00): Je woonerf aangepast naar service met access private net als de parkeerplaats.
Bos losgemaakt van fietspad.
Groet
eggie
eggie (2025-11-08 19:00:01+00:00): Even als voorbeeld een trap gemapt
gr eggie
Norbert Dichter (2025-11-08 20:47:52+00:00): Hello, daveko07, I see you mapped something very strange. Buildings that do not exist on the image, and with poor geometries.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174388250
SuborbitalPigeon (2026-04-10 22:20:46+00:00): This should be reverted
eggie (2025-11-08 19:39:16+00:00): Dag Julian..
Bedankt voor je bijdrage. Probeer wel bij te taggen op de al bestaande adtesnode.
Mvg
eggie
Marc Mongenet (2025-12-21 22:19:55+00:00): Cette modification laisse des données dans un état incohérent concernant les lanes (par ex. lanes=2; turn:lanes=none|none|slight_right.
Je remets tout ça en bon état.
Negreheb (2025-12-12 16:12:47+00:00): Servus, 
kanns sein, dass du dich beim Radweg im Tunnel beim LKH ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/582856092 ) vertan hast? Weil der Radweg ist niemals 2 Meter breit :D
Hugoren Martinako (2025-11-14 13:27:43+00:00): Revertido changeset xq introduce elementos duplicados
Negreheb (2025-11-10 10:42:55+00:00): Servus, cool, dass du mitmachst. Falls du mal Lust hast, ich schau, dass ich jeden ersten Dienstag im Monat eine OpenStreetMap Treffpunkt in Salzburg mache. 
Das nächste ist am 02.12.2025, Infos findest du dann auch unter 
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/osm-treffen-salzburg-stammtisch/100985/8

Im Jänner wird keiner sein, wird dann aber auch im Thread drinnnen stehen. 

Liebe Grüße
Stefan
Wikiscout (2025-11-10 13:19:28+00:00): Hallo Stefan,

Danke für die Einladung, ich plane zu kommen.

Viele Grüße
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:36:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
Szymson (2025-11-08 19:18:24+00:00): Najnowsze ortofoto nie przedstawia ronda w takiej szczegółowości by pozwolić na tego typu poprawki - zestaw zmian wycofano
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:38:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
Gregory Peony (2025-11-09 00:57:55+00:00): Welcome to OSM and thank you for your contribution! 

None of the footprints you've added thus far represent buildings, so I've reverted your changesets.

Each footprint should represent a building. Please watch [this video about imagery interpretation](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJ-vUwtS3A8). Sometimes buildings may appear to share a common wall, but this is sometimes an illusion; only map them with shared nodes if you have reason to believe that they really do touch.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174390305
michal_f (2025-11-09 19:45:15+00:00): Pozwoliłem sobie zmienić na chodnik - nie ma oznakowania DR ani CPR.
LordGarySugar (2025-11-09 05:15:27+00:00): Why?
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:34:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:35:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
mueschel (2025-11-09 18:31:05+00:00): Hi,
what does 'withdrawal limit" mean? You can only get up to 10GBP here?
Giovanni Cappellari (2025-11-09 18:37:41+00:00): It means you can only withdraw £5-£10 notes
mueschel (2025-11-09 19:04:09+00:00): Thanks!

There is a tag for that:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Acash_out%3Anotes%3Adenominations
qstep (2025-11-08 19:16:45+00:00): Hiányoztak city és postcode címkék.
tevildo_ (2025-11-24 14:51:30+00:00): Nice catch! This is a change from a colloquial name to the official name of the peak.
BCNorwich (2025-11-10 07:28:50+00:00): Hi, Way: 1448479823 duplicated an existing highway, so I've removed it.

Regards Bernard.
gmar5 (2025-11-10 14:16:11+00:00): Hi.

Previously, the "Friends of South Park" group asked for these informal desire paths in the middle of the park not to be mapped, to encourage more routes and avoid persistent damage to the grass.

Although it would be legitimate to map them, I think we can honour that request, since they are very informal anyway. I will update them, leaving a note for future mappers who might see the aerial image and add them again.

Thanks.
Duja (2025-12-22 12:30:12+00:00): I'm not aware of this peak being called "Acin čot". It's not named on military maps, on any other map I can find. What's your source about this name?
jVF5nUXy6w (2025-12-22 13:37:30+00:00): Hi @Duja! This name is on a sign leading to it and at the very top with the signature "Acin Cot 503 m"
Duja (2025-12-25 08:39:45+00:00): Ah thanks. It looked like a prank... But even if it was, it was successful, since nobody removed the sign and it ended up on OSM :) I'll leave a note in its description.
mmns (2026-03-21 15:01:01+00:00): @Duja, @jVF5nUXy6w
Thanks for the clarification regarding the sign. However, I would like to propose the removal of the name 'Acin čot' from the name tag.

Historically, this peak has always been nameless (an elevation point only), and the name does not appear on any official topographic or military maps. While there may be a physical sign present, it appears to be a private or 'rogue' installation rather than an officially recognized toponym. 

In line with OSM naming conventions, we should avoid 'ground truth' that reflects temporary or unofficial naming. I suggest we either:

1. Remove the name tag entirely.
2. Move the name to noname=yes and perhaps keep a note in description or official_name=none to prevent it from being re-added.

What do you think about reverting the name to keep the map data clean and professional?
jVF5nUXy6w (2026-03-23 16:07:13+00:00): @mmns
I remove the unofficial name and set recommended tags to prevent from refilled. Thanks.
Changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180312891
DodoGTA (2025-11-09 10:12:51+00:00): Ar toje stotyje yra tik autobusų išvykimo lentelės (o ar dar yra ekranų kaip Kauno stotyje)?
Dom Antas (2025-11-09 10:36:30+00:00): Yra ekranai
habi (2025-11-10 09:36:16+00:00): Ciao Baumi
Viel besser als den Spielplatz zu löschen, ist es diesen mit den korrekten Zugangswerten zu erfasse, hier wäre das `access=private`.
Nur so ist sichergestellt, dass nicht irgendjemand den Spielplatz wieder anhand eines Besuchs oder der Luftbilder wieder erfasst.
Ich habe das in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174453126 erledigt.

Die Erklärung dazu (für Strassen/Wege) findest du hier: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

Und: Von den Luftfotos her dünkt mich der Spielplatz schampar gross und ausgebaut für dass dieser nicht öffentlich ist, nichtsdestrototz habe ich diesen mit `access=private` erfasst.

Gruss,
habi