piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
rhtb0 (2023-02-28 13:50:37+00:00): 그리고이름 칸에는 해당 지물의 명칭만 적어 넣어야 합니다. 범주, 유형, 설명, 주소, 참고 사항("20xx년 완공 예정" 등)과 같은 부가 정보를 포함해서는 안 됩니다. 
실제로 존재하는 지물을 바탕으로 지도를 그리세요. 지도 렌더러, 내비게이션 이용자, 데이터 소비자들에게 맞춰준다는 이유로 부정확한 데이터를 넣지 마세요. 보기 좋아진다는 이유로 데이터를 틀린 방향으로 수정하지 마세요. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ko:%EC%9D%B4%EB%A6%84
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ko:%EC%A2%8B%EC%9D%80_%EA%B4%80%EB%A1%80#%EB%A0%8C%EB%8D%94%EB%9F%AC%EC%97%90_%EB%A7%9E%EC%B6%B0_%EC%A7%80%EB%8F%84%EB%A5%BC_%EC%A0%9C%EC%9E%91%ED%95%98%EC%A7%80_%EB%A7%88%EB%9D%BC
LockOnGuy (2023-02-28 18:30:24+00:00): Hello mahmoud_eltorky,    
I have few question I would like an answer regarding this changeset,
1-What is the source of this changeset?    
2-Did you survey this highway in person on the ground?     
3-Did you discuss this major change with the Iraqi OSM community?      
Regards.
mahmoud_eltorky (2023-03-01 07:20:53+00:00): Hello LockOnGuy;
According to the rules for OpenStreetMaps about the classification
in "motorway" was a very high classification in this area to be "motorway ", is a description for "motorway" High capacity, highway designed to safely carry fast motor traffic.
For more information on how to use the "motorway"
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmotorway
So it is more suitable to be "secondary" as an overview in this location.
I did some research and I found this video showing the tunnel and Yafa Street also:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CIdO0DPSKPk
If you have an official page for the Iraqi OSM community it will be helpful for us.
Thank you for your understanding.
mahmoud_eltorky
LockOnGuy (2023-03-01 20:31:21+00:00): Hi,
  What I understand from your answer is that you don't have local knowledge of the area nor surveyed it in person and changed it without asking the local community.   

  You can find the OSM Iraq community on the OSM wiki page:  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/List_of_OSM_centric_Telegram_accounts#Asia:~:text=%40OSM_Iraq    
 

  I would suggest not using Youtube as a source for OSM as it's unreliable and anyone can upload a video with any title and name it anything or do some edits on the video etc... also on top of that, I would not recommend it also for legal reasons as I don't think it's license compatible. See the following links: https://www.openstreetmap.org/redactions/6 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/redactions/62        

Regards.
LockOnGuy (2023-03-02 23:42:57+00:00): Hello again :)    
I haven't heard from you for 2 days about this matter.  
 I'm sorry but I have to revert this by tomorrow if you don't give a reliable source we can rely on or at least contact the community and have the community agree with this changeset.       
Best Regards.
LockOnGuy (2023-03-04 05:14:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully in changeset 133277028. Please contact local community in future for such major changes.       
Best regards.
sara qasem (2023-03-06 13:16:38+00:00): Hello LockOnGuy;
Thank you for your message and for sharing the OSM Iraq community link with me. I apologize if my recent edits caused any issues or concerns. I will definitely take your feedback into consideration and make sure to engage with the local community before making any further changes.
Regarding the classification of the way in question, I understand your concerns about its designation as a motorway. However, based on the OSM tagging guidelines, a way can be classified as a motorway if it meets certain criteria, such as high speed limits and limited access.
so I think it would be a primary classification to preserve the map consistency 

Regards,
Sara.
LockOnGuy (2023-03-06 13:21:42+00:00): No, it’s motorway, its a high speed road 120km/h speed limit on it. And it have exit and entrance roads, it’s not connected to other normal street.      
Why do you want to change it? And what is your source?     
Best regards.
sara qasem (2023-03-06 13:44:21+00:00): Is it okay that it comes from Primary roads from both sides? if you see it is right and the map render is good so keep it a motorway
Regards,
LockOnGuy (2023-03-06 13:48:47+00:00): You mean you want to change it because it's connected to primary roads on both ends? Thats the reason?
eggie (2023-02-28 12:20:22+00:00): Da's mooi als iets gereed is, maar waarom access=no op het fietspad?

Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=133125831

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-02-28 12:21:30+00:00): Zo te zien is het een residential met parkeermogelijkheden en niet zo'n lang fietspad.
eggie (2023-02-28 12:39:59+00:00): Ik heb het iets aangepast en access=no verwijderd.
De landuse=construction heb ik ook verwijderd en de gebouwen van construction gehaald. 
MVG
eggie
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-28 12:20:16+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o miejscowości. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, zastosuj kombinację addr:city + addr:street. Jeśli nie, przekaż nazwę miejscowości w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10699344153

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
HubMiner (2023-10-28 02:06:49+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10699339349

Hi, could you check the name spelling, is the 4th letter correct?
batyrmastyr (2023-10-28 05:57:06+00:00): You're right, this is a weird spelling mistake with 3 possible corrections (a/s/z). 
As soon as I don't remember correct spelling and don't live there, feel free to remove the name.
Hugoren Martinako (2023-06-16 07:20:28+00:00): ¿Alguna razón por la que todas las calles tengan la partícula /Polvorosa en el nombre?
Hugoren Martinako (2023-06-16 08:28:28+00:00): Vale, acabo de ver que las placas utilizan el apelativo brinquero también. puesto que Gacería no es una lengua que tenga un código ISO_639-1, por el momento se podría utilizar:

name=Calle Segovia
loc_name=Polvorosa Segovia

Digo esto porque Osmose marca como error el nombre duplicado
Arturo Francisco Barbero (2023-06-17 12:00:30+00:00): No sé si sería correcto:
name=Calle Segovia
loc_name=Polvorosa Segovia
al fin y al cabo el nombre oficial incluye lo de "polvorosa", desde luego es una situación extraña.
Davileci (2023-12-05 00:37:46+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:name:eu-x-gaceria
Noen (2023-02-28 13:46:02+00:00): PSV står for «public service vehicles», og det er de kjøretøy som får lov til å kjøre i et kollektivfelt.
Vis kun busser har lov til å kjøre her kan du bytte ut kombinasjonen psv=yes, taxi=no med bus=yes.
eggie (2023-02-28 12:53:59+00:00): Dag Slothdanig. Je vraagt feedback  
Je zou een vlak landuse=construction kunnen leggen als vlak als er nu gebouwd gaat worden. Blijft het een tijd braak liggen dan tag je landuse=greenfield.
Het voorkomt dat iemand een gebouw weer gaat intekenen. 
MVG
eggie
Slothdanig (2023-02-28 13:25:29+00:00): Bedankt, ik heb een vlak bouwgrond toegevoegd
ACIPasig (2023-02-28 12:51:00+00:00): ACI DZGO Sorsogon
trial (2023-03-07 14:48:44+00:00): modifciation abnnulée pour cause de vandalisme.
Velikodsky (2023-03-01 23:37:38+00:00): Please do not map the territory of Ukraine, especially on the front line. Read this: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Russian–Ukrainian_war
bxl-forever (2023-02-28 16:09:51+00:00): Hello,

Would you please be so kind as to always write titles for your changes.  A "no comment" changeset implies some detective work to examine changes one by one.  (In other changesets, you used to write very good descriptions, though.)

It looks like you added surface=paved to footways and cycleways.  This is fine, despite "paved" is considered a weak tag, it’s always better to be a little more accurate: in Brussels, most infrastructure like this will have "asphalt" or "paving_stones", and in some cases, "sett".
queerthoughts (2023-02-28 21:20:42+00:00): Hi,

Yes, I try to add descriptions of changes, this time I was in a hurry because I had to leave unexpectedly. My apologies.

As for the surface tags, I think it's paving_stones in this case, but as I'm not entirely sure, I set it to paved. I pass here quite frequently so I'll try to have a look around and update it in more detail.
muralito (2023-02-28 23:35:07+00:00): Hola. ¿en que te basas para este cambio?
Tobias Seidel (2023-03-01 07:47:09+00:00): Why did you edit active war area in Open streetmap? Did you read this? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Russian%E2%80%93Ukrainian_war
Krawujewatz (2023-03-01 22:07:48+00:00): Was soll die Aufregung?
Die Siedlung ist gemäß frei zugänglichen Informationen bereits vollständig in russischer Hand. Die können also die Daten anhand der Gegebenheiten vor Ort prüfen und ggf. anpassen.
Tobias Seidel (2023-03-01 22:26:14+00:00): Was heißt Aufregung? Ich habe keine Aufregung gemacht. Dass diese Region die momentan am stärksten umkämpfte Stelle auf der Welt ist, brauchen wir glaube ich hier nicht zu diskutieren. Alles was hier in Open Streetmap als Ukraine markiert ist, wird als Ukraine angesehen und soll nicht bearbeitet werden, so wie ich es verstanden habe und es ist genau genommen nach ukrainischen Recht strafbar, wie man in obigem Link nachlesen kann.
Und was meinst Du mit "Die können [das] vor Ort prüfen[..]"? Wer und wozu?
Krawujewatz (2023-03-01 22:58:10+00:00): Der Text, den du verlinkt hast, ist ein Appell, nicht mehr. Die erwähnte Strafbarkeit bezieht sich auf Informationen zu ukrainischen Truppen. 
Wie bereits geschrieben, sind diese nicht mehr vor Ort, wenn man den Ruinen noch diesen Namen geben mag. Die Russen, die jetzt dort sind, können die Richtigkeit der OSM-Daten prüfen, wenn sie ausreichend Langeweile haben. Ansonsten dürften die Russen über bessere und genauer Karten und Luftbilder verfügen als die, mit denn wir OSM speisen und verbessern. 
Ich wünsche eine gute Nacht.
Velikodsky (2023-03-01 23:42:18+00:00): Ivanivske is not under Russian control. But you map it too: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133127922 . Please don't do this.
SomeoneElse (2023-03-02 12:21:36+00:00): Hello Krawujewatz,
Andy from OSM's Data Working Group here.  As has already been requested above, please don't map active war zones within Ukraine while the war is ongoing.  Unless you are in the area yourself any sources you are using will be completely out of date.
Best Regards,
Andy
laznik (2024-02-02 17:18:20+00:00): Hi, you seem to have imported a new way (1149668029) into OSM, regardless of the fact that the ski trail follows ways that already exist in the database. The result is, we have now parallel ways all the way down from Donovaly to Sachticky. Could you  explain please?
laznik (2024-02-17 20:23:58+00:00): Ar you paying attention to these notes?
woodpeck (2024-02-25 11:41:04+00:00): Hello zsolt d, please review this situation and provide a reply here. Thank you, Frederik Ramm, OSMF DWG, Ticket #2024022310000256
zsolt d (2024-02-25 14:32:27+00:00): When we went there, we didn't go on the melted stone-hard road, but instead went along it in the snow. If this mark of mine is wrong, please help me delete my wrong mark, because I don't know what other route connection I might accidentally delete along with it. Please feel free to delete what I posted wrong. Thanks in advance.
laznik (2024-02-25 15:27:41+00:00): First, in the future please respond in a timely matter to requests for comments, as delays put unnecessary burden on users (like myself) and the volunteers from OSMF DWG (like Frederik).
Second - I have traveled the way we are discussing here many times on skis, and know that on most of its course it follows forest roads. Additionally, if you would click on these forest roads along the way you created, you would notice there are already tags and relations marking them as x-country skiing trails. Consequently, I would recommend you to delete the way and any others you might have created in a similar manner.
zsolt d (2024-02-25 16:29:36+00:00): OK. I managed to delete the secondary ski route in question that I marked. Please check if it's good now.
laznik (2024-02-25 17:02:51+00:00): seems ok now. Thanks.
trial (2023-03-07 14:48:55+00:00): modifciation abnnulée pour cause de vandalisme.
ovruni (2023-02-28 23:24:30+00:00): Hola, en la wiki se menciona que el deporte de soccer es un deporte de 11 jugadores, voy a restaurar esta etiqueta https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:sport%3Dsoccer
Quispe Keen (2023-03-04 18:22:13+00:00): Mi error, no revisé las wiki, lo lamento.
ovruni (2023-02-28 23:25:25+00:00): Hola, varios de tus conjuntos de cambios solamente indican un hashtag y nada mas que indique lo que se ha querido hacer en ellos, en este aparentemente se junta la manzana con la vereda.
Saludos
Quispe Keen (2023-03-04 18:20:59+00:00): Recibido, estaré más atento con los conjuntos de cambios 🤝🏼.
tux67 (2023-02-28 16:06:44+00:00): Hi Uli_D,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/635625953/wiki/DE:Key:height?uselang=de
Ich nehme an, du meintest auch building:levels hier?

Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133128726
Carlos Brys (2023-02-28 15:14:50+00:00): En OSM no se deben cargar datos personales.
Se modifica la edición para ajustarla a las especificaciones de OSM.
Carlos Brys (2023-02-28 15:12:06+00:00): En OSM no se deben cargar datos personales.
Se modifica la edición para ajustarla a las especificaciones de OSM.
jodd (2023-03-23 18:17:39+00:00): Hallo oha,
du hast an der Haltestelle Hessendenkmal zwei Busbuchten [1], [2] angelegt. Die neuen Wege hast du mit highway=service und bus_bay=yes getaggt. So wie ich das Wiki zu bus_bay [3] verstehe, soll mit bus_bay=yes der Abschnitt einer Straße getaggt werden, der eine Busbucht  besitzt. Der tag soll nicht für eigenständige Wege bei baulich getrennten Busfahrbahnen genutzt werden. 

Am Hessendenkmal gibt es keine bauliche Trennung, deswegen sollten die Wege [1] und [2] meiner Meinung nach wieder gelöscht werden. Kannst du dir das bitte nochmal anschauen?

Aufgefallen ist das mir, weil die Routenrelationen der Buslinien Lücken bekommen haben.

VG Jo
[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1150163955
[2] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1150163949
[3]
jodd (2023-03-23 18:18:10+00:00): Hier noch der Link zum Wiki:
[3] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:bus_bay
oha (2023-03-24 09:22:46+00:00): Hallo jodöd,
der Punkt ist etwas kompliziert durch den Fakt, dass der Bus über den separierten Radweg ihren muss, um die Haltebucht zu erreichen. Stadteinwärts ist sogar noch die separate Abbiegespur zwischen Radweg und Hauptstraße. Ein solcher Fall ist in dem Wiki nicht berücksichtigt. Aber man kann es natürlich evt. auch anders darstellen...
oha (2023-03-24 09:27:56+00:00): Es heißt ja sogar im Wiki: "Für physisch getrennte Haltebuchten vom normalen Fahrweg sollte ein highway=service angelegt werden."
Fidelis Assis (2023-02-28 16:59:45+00:00): Anderson, boa tarde. As alterações nesses radares não estão corretas. A direção não é aquela para onde a câmera aponta, mas a do fluxo de tráfego fiscalizado por ela. Nesse caso, o mapeamento anterior (radar como nó da via) estaca certo e sua alteração inverteu as direções. 
Vou reverter para acertar, OK?
H@mlet (2023-03-03 10:17:17+00:00): Bonjour,

merci pour votre contribution à OSM.

Néanmoins il y a de nombreux problèmes sur ce "changeset" (ensemble de modifications).

L'un a été corrigé (trop) rapidement par une personne à distance (le tag `building` à la place de `landuse`), mais cette personne n'a pas remis le reste en place. 

Vous avez donc notamment modifié la zone urbanisée de Sérent, en disant que c'est un bâtiment qui s'appelle "médecin etc.". Un très grand bâtiment ! ;-)

Je vais essayer de démêler tout ça d'ici demain, je vous décrirais ensuite mes modifications.

Cordialement.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133129215
H@mlet (2023-03-03 10:11:25+00:00): Bonjour,

tout d'abord, merci de contribuer à la cartographie d'OSM.

il y a plusieurs problèmes ici :

- vous avez appliqué un tag qui n'a pas vraiment de rapport (`landuse=military`), alors qu'il y en a un fait pour : `historic=memorial`
- la zone cartographiée correspond à un espace public, sans doute un petit parc (`leisure=park` ?), le mémorial est beaucoup plus petit.
- le champ name est réservé au nom de l'objet, il y a un champ description pour décrire. Mais le mieux est d'utiliser des tags compréhensibles par les machines (comme memorial= ). Dans ce, si le monument n'a pas de nom, le champ name peut rester vide.

Quelques liens de références :

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:historic%3Dmemorial
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:leisure%3Dpark
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#N'utilisez_pas_de_tag_name_pour_d%C3%A9crire_des_choses.

Je suis disponible pour répondre à vos questions si vous en avez.

Cordialement.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133129477
Arlo James Barnes (2023-12-24 08:41:34+00:00): Looks good to me!
Romwriter (2023-02-28 18:43:00+00:00): Changeset reverted, please do not vandalize the data
Fizzie-DWG (2023-02-28 23:11:41+00:00): Reverted by DWG for vandalism: changeset/133149480
Luzandro (2023-03-03 06:07:29+00:00): kann man das fixme damit entfernen?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10671876740
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133129729
kuhni74 (2023-03-03 07:53:11+00:00): ja, genau, sorry, danke!
kuhni74 (2023-03-03 08:48:37+00:00): erledigt
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-28 14:00:17+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10699561564

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Carlos Brys (2023-02-28 15:07:43+00:00): En OSM no se deben ingresar datos personales.
Se modifica la edición
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2023-02-28 13:55:43+00:00): 搞错，是洛阳
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2023-02-28 13:55:55+00:00): 好像确实是郑州
Romwriter (2023-02-28 18:43:04+00:00): Changeset reverted, please do not vandalize the data
user_5359 (2023-02-28 15:40:19+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I remove your SEO SPAM, because you didn't add any useful information (address, contact and type of business). If you need help: You are welcome!
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-28 14:10:26+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9087761558

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-28 14:10:25+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9087761549
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9251362938

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
MxxCon (2023-03-01 01:51:28+00:00): Hello.
Beatnic's phone number is exactly the same as the previous business there?🤨
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133130449
wille (2023-03-01 12:53:48+00:00): Thanks for noticing! I've updated it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133130449
lenny32 (2023-02-28 16:58:04+00:00): Envoyé par erreur sans commentaire ni source, Devait faire parti du https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133137558#map=11/43.3779/1.0370
Romwriter (2023-02-28 18:43:08+00:00): Changeset reverted, please do not vandalize the data
marczoutendijk (2023-03-01 07:19:24+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6906
5m4u9 (2023-02-28 17:44:27+00:00): Hola Daniel, gracias por añadir el nombre de la calle, solo una sugerencia, no es necesario añadir el nombre del barrio.

Más al norte, hay una cancha y menciona Plan 154, sería bueno añadir el nombre del barrio, seguramente el lugar sería cerca a la cancha de fútbol o plaza.
Allroads (2023-02-28 15:34:54+00:00): Om beter te kunnen controleren met verkeersbordendatabank, voegen we aan deze stukken traffic_sign=NL:G12a toe.

Een OSM heeft dit zichtbaar gemaakt
https://smoothefiets.ddns.net/html/verkeersbordenkaart/index.php?lat=52.009659769&lng=4.376285072&z=19
svenvdmeer (2023-03-01 11:35:06+00:00): Ik zal het de volgende keer meenemen
mavl (2023-04-23 15:58:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:04:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:58:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mueschel (2023-03-01 11:17:26+00:00): Hi,
what's the meaning of "on_the_list:wikidata"? All cases I checked are just the regular wikidata entries of the objects and should have a plain 'wikidata' tag.
mcliquid (2023-03-01 14:41:39+00:00): Hi, thanks for your message. The entries link to list items and I was told in another changeset to use this tag for that. See: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131746422
AntiCompositeNumber (2024-08-25 19:30:18+00:00): (clarification: only the changes to https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15489360 were reverted)
mavl (2023-04-23 16:07:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
user_5359 (2023-03-26 06:22:15+00:00): Hallo! Bitte sieh Dir nochmal http://www.osm.org/node/2171947163 an. Was ist die Bedeutung des Tags de:10043:30014::300142 = de:10043:30014::300143?
nw520 (2023-03-26 11:47:51+00:00): Danke  user_5359 für den Hinweis, den verstümmelten ref:IFOPT-Tag habe ich nun entfernt.
dankarran (2023-02-28 16:26:00+00:00): Streetside imagery suggests the entrance by the roundabout is a gate for pedestrians, but this edit has changed it to a service road, is that intended? 

I can see there is a vehicular access gate just to the west of the pedestrian entrance, but if it's intended for vehicular access, it should be connected to the road instead of just the cycleway.
AWMapper (2023-03-01 08:14:59+00:00): Thank for pointing this out. I've made the necessary changes.
mavl (2023-04-23 16:08:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
marczoutendijk (2023-11-13 14:21:51+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1150178133
bridge=1?
What is the meaning of that?
habi (2023-11-13 19:30:03+00:00): Most probably a typo of mine, which I just corrected to `bridge=yes`
habi (2023-11-13 19:35:15+00:00): No, you already corrected it :)
mavl (2023-04-23 16:07:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
NieWnen (2023-03-02 09:27:41+00:00): Przecinaj drogi z innymi drogami, bo inaczej routing nie zadziała w takim przypadku jak np. tutaj między ścieżką rowerową, a tym trackiem

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8617286149

Ale za to proszę nie łącz obszarów landuse z drogami/chodnikami szczególnie po tej samej linii.
Nie wiem, czy w tej zmianie coś takiego było, ale w poprzednich się raczej zdarzyło.