piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2026-04-11 16:27:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 22 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1484331255 v1 | 7 crossings
https://osm.org/way/756454517 v4 | 5 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1484331256 v1 | 4 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/568585173 v8
https://osm.org/node/572927754 v6
https://osm.org/node/575264505 v5

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=181197863
5m4u9 (2026-04-11 22:19:54+00:00): Hola, bienvenid@ y gracias por querer mejorar el mapa en Bolivia.

Accidentalmente, moviste algunas avenidas y calles cerca al puente. Debes tener algo más de cuidado la siguiente vez.

De todas formas volví a colocar como estaba antes...
evgenykatyshev (2026-04-12 12:37:04+00:00): Hi! It isn't correct to replace level with layer in this case. Level shows vertical location relatively to the ground level while the layer shows the vertical order of crossing objects. Node of toilts doesn't intersect anything but the toilets is located undergorund. So previous tag was right.
yelisey90 (2026-04-12 16:23:48+00:00): Umph, I can't agree with you. Level is meaningful only for entities within buildings; in this case, location=underground is everything we can say about this object. And layer... Well, I think it's logical that it should be the same as for the pedestrian underpass in which the toilet is located, shouldn't it?
Taksine (2026-04-12 08:34:13+00:00): 这里不是乱搞的平台，已经撤回全部编辑。
NeisBot (2026-04-11 16:36:41+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 16 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/998089972 v5 | 16 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/8485347149 v3

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=181198212
iandees (2026-04-11 17:24:05+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8485347149 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181200465, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
NeisBot (2026-04-11 16:56:20+00:00): 🌍 Welcome to OSM, Zovanka Chatricia.
Thanks for contributing!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

✅ Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added fast food amenity, name=BINGXUE"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment
Zandu (2026-05-10 15:37:08+00:00): Hey, are you doing imports? I see the comment says rural distribution. But I see a duplication of the neighborhood Bentley Meadows was also added in this edit. I’ve added a lot of neighborhoods to clarksville. Still many to go. I hope you are reviewing when you import to not duplicate. If you are doing imports I don’t see it documented in your profile which is stated as customary in the imports wiki page. 

Please check the neighborhoods you’ve added to see if there is duplication. The gas and power lines are great additions and look nice where I’ve seen them. Thanks.
zluuzki (2026-05-10 16:43:43+00:00): Hello, I traced this data manually from Bing Aerial Imagery.
(over a period of almost a month, I uploaded it at once because that's easier with JOSM.)

I'm also adding some features other than power lines like various neighbourhoods or factories, when I come across them along the way - apparently I forgot to check in this case if it's already there.

Deleted it. If you come across any more duplicates simply delete them, however I looked at what I added and I didn't see any more duplicates.

PS: i'm currently working on Middle Tennessee Electric power lines southeast of Nashville.
InfosReseaux (2026-04-12 10:45:27+00:00): Bonjour FRichard44,

La modification de way/134685961 pose problème : le poste électrique est dans un bâtiment dédié. Il faut donc que les attributs soient sur le bâtiment et ne pas créer de nœud street cabinet au milieu.
Les armoires sont plus petites et différentes de ce cas là.
Voir ici : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Power_networks/France#Cat%C3%A9gories_de_postes

La situation semble identique sur le changeset 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181199205

Ce n'est pas urgent mais qualifier le bâti lui-même est très utile pour la raison expliquée dans cette vidéo : https://peertube.openstreetmap.fr/w/akP5fPGFdDM7JLgYpLcbxj?start=20m15s

Bon dimanche
FRichard44 (2026-04-12 13:32:54+00:00): Bonjour InfosReseaux,

Merci pour le signalement.
Avec la vidéo, le fait de qualifier le bâti devient plus clair.
Ce qui me paraissait mieux en séparant bâtiment du poste, c'était d'éviter de brancher le bâtiment au power=cable, mais c'est sans doute correct pour un bâtiment dédié.

J'ai fait quelques corrections de ce cas et d'autres alentours dans ce changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181230606. Pourrais-tu s'il te plait le vérifier?

ça me permettra ensuite de corriger les nombreux autres erreurs similaires que je fais depuis un moment.

Merci
Bon dimanche également
InfosReseaux (2026-04-12 13:44:42+00:00): Merci beaucoup pour la prise en compte rapide !

En fait les câbles ne se connectent pas au bâtiment non plus. Il faut juste les terminer à l'intérieur du bâtiment sans plus de précision.
Quand on est motivés et qu'on a les informations, c'est à dire très rarement, on peut décrire ce qui se trouve dans le bâtiment, comme ici : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/70564498

Pour le reste des corrections, il n'est pas nécessaire d'ajouter frequency=50 sur le bâtiment. Au fil de l'eau ce sera très bien.

Bonne après-midi !
FRichard44 (2026-04-12 13:58:26+00:00): Merci pour la revue et réponse rapide!
Je vais corriger et faire mieux les prochaines fois.

Bonne après-midi
aceman444 (2026-06-28 15:17:05+00:00): Zdravim, dakujem za pridanie novej cyklocesty.
Preco vsak bolo potrebne vymazat uz predtym postaveny usek https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1110476943 ?
A ta nova cesta by tiez mala mat pruh aj pre chodcov (podla Bratislavskych novin). Preco ste to nezaznacili?
A ako ide cyklocesta cez potok Cierna voda? Nie je tam most?
aceman444 (2026-06-28 15:15:16+00:00): Zdravim, aka oprava? Vymazali ste usek cyklocesty, ktora tu uz existuje niekolko rokov. Uz tu ziadna nie je? Ale je, sam ste pridali jej pokracovanie v inej sade zmien.
NieWnen (2026-06-09 20:29:55+00:00): Cześć,
tagowanie CPR jest nieco inne, używa się highway=path
Zachęcam do zapoznania się z wiki jak tagować ciągi pieszo-rowerowe:

osm.wiki/Pl:Rowery#Drogi_dla_pieszych_i_rower%C3%B3w

Choć w tym przypadku mam wątpliwości, czy zmapowane linie to CPRy, te przy cmentarzu/przystanku.
kingkingHK (2026-04-12 03:36:37+00:00): Destination languages should be `destination:lang:*=`, not `destination:*=`, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Destination_details#destination:lang:%3Clanguage_code%3E

Fixed with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181213496
vectorial8192 (2026-04-12 04:01:19+00:00): Let's just say, I often don't check proposal pages, and in this case somehow the proposal became de facto without finishing the approval process, so I extra could not know.
kingkingHK (2026-04-12 04:15:00+00:00): Don't worry, I'm not blaming you. I didn't know that page before this discussion either; only observed it should be `lang:*` by looking at other objects.
matteobott (2026-05-20 12:57:36+00:00): Ciao! Ho notato che in questo changeset hai modificato l'area religiosa vicino a Via Fraschini. Volevo segnalarti che i dati inseriti non sono corretti: quell'area non è recintata nella realtà, fatto salvo quanto era stato mappato precedentemente.

Per favore, quando mappi cerca di fare un double check, altrimenti si rischia di inserire informazioni sbagliate sulla mappa. Ho provveduto a correggere l'errore per ripristinare la situazione reale. Buon pomeriggio!
NeisBot (2026-04-11 17:09:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 9 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/87470821 v7 | 9 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=181199680
HurricaneGator (2026-04-23 22:02:06+00:00): Hello SuadMiftari! 

I previously remodeled these trunk links (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1417425694) and (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/693033035) so they would be a separate dual carriageway. I noticed they were remodeled into overlapping ways which is triggering validation errors. Currently, it appears as if westbound drivers on (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/693033035) are driving into eastbound (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1417425694). What do you think about separating the ways from each other like previous modeling?
 
Thank you and happy mapping!
Konkon153 (2026-04-11 17:15:51+00:00): [ und damit alle 2.968 aktuell vorhandenen Adressen in der Gemeinde Plau am See vollständig angepasst ]
eggie (2026-04-11 17:31:16+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback   proposed heb ik verwijderd
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-04-11 17:35:05+00:00): Zo te zien ligt er ook een fietspad langs de Vossenburglaan.
https://viewer.satellietdataportaal.nl/@53.23371,6.664951,18/?datastrip=20260408_SVNEO-02&sensorname=SuperView-NEO
eggie (2026-04-11 17:51:57+00:00): Hoi,
Die muur loopt dwars door een gebouw. Zodra je gaat schuiven met dat gras en daar zit die muur dan aan vast gaat je muur mee.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=181200360

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-04-11 17:56:49+00:00): De muur heb ik opnieuw uitgelijnd conform de BGT.
jSeke (2026-05-03 11:58:33+00:00): as well as reverting all the name tags, you've gotten rid of all the name:gd tags. come on, *correcting* is fine but deleting all those data isn't
SuborbitalPigeon (2026-05-03 13:09:13+00:00): That's fair enough, in all my recent (and future) fixes of name=*, I've been doing it manually one feature at a time, which takes a *lot* of my time.
jSeke (2026-05-03 22:44:14+00:00): I'm sorry, I've learnt now and won't do it again
fantomas (2026-04-12 10:01:28+00:00): Hello. How are "Sentinel 2, Esri, GPS" and "ОКТМО" related?
Noro Hibu (2026-04-12 10:58:40+00:00): Hello. Sentinel 2, Esri, and GPS are the base layers I use for any map editing. That’s why they are always included in the changeset. They are not directly related to OKTMO. Therefore, I include OKTMO in the changeset description to provide a clearer understanding of what was actually done.
fantomas (2026-04-12 11:30:27+00:00): 'That’s why they are always included in the changeset.' - This is a very strange idea. You can read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source
eggie (2026-04-11 18:07:46+00:00): Zodra die Dieze onder de huizen doorgaat geeft dat een foutmelding.
Echte duikers zijn het niet. Je zou covered =yes kunnen gebruiken op de waterway. Dan ben je van je foutmeldingem af. De eindnodes van het ondergrondse deel maak je dan vast aan de gebouwomtrek.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-04-11 18:10:14+00:00): warnings:crossing_ways:building-waterway 	4

en layer=1 aan de gebouwen
NeisBot (2026-04-11 17:46:24+00:00): 🌍 欢迎来到 OSM，KoukiLML。
谢谢你的贡献！

为了使协作更容易，并帮助他人理解你的编辑，最好添加你所做的更改的简要描述。清晰的评论可以帮助社区跟踪你的工作并提供更好的反馈。你可以在这里找到写好评论的提示[1]。

✅ 这里有一个基于你地图编辑的示例评论： "调整了各种特征"
(Auto-translation)
---
🌍 Welcome to OSM, KoukiLML.
Thanks for contributing!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

✅ Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Adjusted various features"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment
eggie (2026-04-11 18:17:19+00:00): Oke.. ,maar cycling=pump_track ontbreekt.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cycling%3Dpump_track
eggie (2026-04-11 18:14:18+00:00): Die sporttags club=sport sport=...   renderen helaas (nog) niet op de standaard kaart.
Meestal zet ik een clubhuistag op de adresnode.
amenity=community_centre community_centre=club_home.
Gr eggie
kiritimati_c7g (2026-04-12 16:45:27+00:00): "Please note that this change has been reverted; no valid reason as to remove this (likely vandalism)."
NeisBot (2026-04-11 17:57:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/403188555 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Adult store"
---
Ad esempio, una versione più neutra e fattuale del tuo testo potrebbe essere: "Negozio per adulti"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisBot (2026-04-11 17:57:50+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/6697819047 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Water damage restoration service"
---
Например, более нейтральная и фактическая версия вашего текста могла бы быть: "Услуги по восстановлению после водного ущерба"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
whammo (2026-04-12 00:37:34+00:00): Is there a storefront here? Usually we only map businesses that have signage and a dedicated space, not for example run out of someone's residence.
Enock4seth (2026-04-11 18:05:35+00:00): Hi OKOKYENA AMOS MAP, what are you trying map? Is this a dormitory / hostel?
Enock4seth (2026-04-11 18:11:23+00:00): Hi, want are you trying to man here? The name field for features is not your name.
eggie (2026-04-11 18:22:17+00:00): Tip... Geen name= .. gebruiken om iets te beschrijven . Ik zal name=Buitenfitnesslocatie verwijderen.
Dat is het zelfde als name=bankje, name=boom 
gr eggie
chinook17 (2026-07-12 19:03:52+00:00): Peux-tu effacer toutes les fausses pistes cyclables que tu as créées?
Si c'est des bandes cyclables bidirectionnelles, un cycleway left/right lane + cycleway right/left oneway no suffit. Et toujours un lcn yes.
eggie (2026-04-11 18:40:00+00:00): Feedback.. Lastig te zien. 
In de BGT staat het water als nog veel groter en één vlak, maar staan die bomen dan in het water?
eggie (2026-04-11 18:42:04+00:00): Maar als je het daar kent lijkt het me oke
https://viewer.satellietdataportaal.nl/@51.71124,5.287846,18/?datastrip=20260302_SVNEO-04&sensorname=SuperView-NEO
eggie (2026-04-11 18:38:11+00:00): Een barn is een boeren schuur. Klopt dat? 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dbarn

MVG
eggie
rempshaener (2026-04-12 19:14:03+00:00): Hallo,
kannst du erklären, wieso du einen neuen Hydranten https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13723853081 anlegst, den bestehende mit gleicher Nummer https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11051115517 aber löschst?
Viele Grüße
TGTAG (2026-04-12 19:42:22+00:00): Moin, 

ich habe eine CSV Datei mit allen Hydranten Daten aus Großhansdorf hochgeladen. Es gab bereits ca. 15 % dieser Hydranten. Denn bisherigen Bestand habe ich anschließend gelöscht, da die neue CSV Datei alle genauen GPS Punkte gesetzt hat. Die bisherigen 15% waren nur ungefähr richtig eingetragen. 

Beste Grüße
rempshaener (2026-04-12 19:56:11+00:00): Hallo,
mal davon abgesehen, dass die csv-Datei hoffentlich von dir selbst erhoben wurde, damit das Ganze keinen  unabgestimmten Import darstellt (osm.wiki/DE:Import/Guidelines bzw. osm.wiki/DE:Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct.): erst anlegen und dann löschen geht nicht. Es wäre nötig gewesen, die bestehenden Daten zu berücksichtigen und entsprechend zu mergen.
Viele Grüße
woodpeck_repair (2026-04-15 11:24:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 181361804 where the changeset comment is: Revert eines undiskutierten Imports, s. https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/hydranten-hochgeladen-und-dabei-den-kleineren-altbestand-geloscht/143059
eggie (2026-04-11 19:00:13+00:00): warnings:crossing_ways:building-highway 	2
warnings:crossing_ways:highway-highway 	1

Je pad loopt door een gebouw. 
Verbind de eindnodes met de gebouwomtrek en tag bij als het een onderdoorgang betreft
tunnel=building_passage
Wanneer het erg breed is dan covered=yes.
Gr eggie
eggie (2026-04-11 19:03:18+00:00): Die parkeergarage underground even als building:part getagd . Dan valt de rendering weg. Nu die doorgangen.
eggie (2026-04-11 19:15:14+00:00): Als voorbeeld aangepast met building_passage. Aan de zuidzijde voetpad vastgemaakt aan Oude Hulst. Het zal anders niet routeren.
eggie (2026-04-12 07:41:21+00:00): Hoi...  Dit is zeker niet te groot. 
Weet je dat PDOK geen satellietfoto is, maar een luchtfoto. (vliegtuigje)
Dit is bv wel een sat foto..
https://viewer.satellietdataportaal.nl/@51.40343,6.119819,18/?datastrip=20260322_SVNEO-01&sensorname=SuperView-NEO

Groet,
eggie
molensteen (2026-04-12 10:23:22+00:00): ah dankjewel eggie, wist niet dat PDOK vliegtuigfoto was
rarad74 (2026-04-11 19:15:26+00:00): Salut. Potecile nu se deseneaza peste cladiri. Pe viitor foloseste imaginile mapbox. Sunt mult mai recente decat Bing.
woodpeck_repair (2026-04-15 11:24:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 181361804 where the changeset comment is: Revert eines undiskutierten Imports, s. https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/hydranten-hochgeladen-und-dabei-den-kleineren-altbestand-geloscht/143059
eggie (2026-04-11 19:42:59+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  Wat is je bron in deze maxspeed 300?
Was er niet een 'dingetje' dat dat niet toegestaan was?
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Bus5top1 (2026-04-11 20:45:32+00:00): It has been 300 kmh since construction and opening in 2009, International trains such as the Eurostar, travel at 300kmh on the line whereas slower trains e.g. sprinter use the line @ 200kmh, furthermore I got information from Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HSL-Zuid), most of the line is @300 kmh except at tight turns and junctions.
DwarfNebula_ (2026-04-11 23:38:17+00:00): Hi Bus5top1,

The same wikipedia page has a whole section on why the speedlimit is currently lower. They will fix it starting in 2028. Also, since the signs telling the maxspeed are displayed only in the cabin (ETCS), it's hard to define what part is or isn't restricted speed.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HSL-Zuid#Discovery_of_cracks_and_speed_restrictions
https://www.prorail.nl/nieuws/prorail-bereidt-groot-herstel-hsl-zuid-in-2028-voor
eggie (2026-04-12 06:57:14+00:00): @Bus5top1
Ik heb een draadje geopend op het forum
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/algemeen-openbaar-vervoer-nl-topic/7050/291
mapzotte (2026-04-11 19:46:35+00:00): wie kann ich das ausversehen gelöschte wiederherstellen?
Rainero (2026-04-12 17:04:00+00:00): Hallo mapzotte,
entweder mit dem Reverter-Plugin im JOSM-Editor oder mit osm-revert: https://revert.monicz.dev  
Ich habe die Änderung von dir schon zurückgesetzt. Du hattest daneben einen Fahrradständer neu mit weiteren Merkmalen angelegt; die habe ich dem wiederhergestellten hinzugefügt.  
Allerdings sehe ich, dass entweder "capacity" nicht stimmt oder die Art der Fahrradständer. Bei bicycle_parking=stands, d.h. Anlehnbügel müsste es eine gerade Zahl sein, weil man an einem Bügel zwei Fahrräder abstellen kann. Könntest du das noch korrigieren?

Viele Grüße,
Rainer
ProvableMyth (2026-04-21 02:32:55+00:00): It looks like you accidentally created this node twice (see changeset 181204611). If that's the case, can you remove one of them please?
RJ Lerng (2026-04-21 19:17:07+00:00): Thank you very much for pointing it out! I have deleted the duplicated one.
morkovkin (2026-04-11 19:39:49+00:00): Забыл добавить, что аптеку я двигал основываясь на Яндекс панорамах
NeisBot (2026-04-11 19:56:24+00:00): 🌍 Bienvenue sur OSM, Spearb.
Merci de contribuer !

Pour faciliter la collaboration et aider les autres à comprendre tes modifications, il est préférable d'ajouter une courte description des changements que tu as effectués. Des commentaires clairs aident la communauté à suivre ton travail et à fournir des retours plus précis. Tu peux trouver des conseils pour écrire de bons commentaires ici[1].

✅ Voici un exemple de commentaire basé sur tes modifications de carte : "Ajout de bâtiments, suppression du nom alternatif et du nom de maison incorrect"
(Auto-translation)
---
🌍 Welcome to OSM, Spearb.
Thanks for contributing!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

✅ Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added buildings, removed alternate name and incorrect house name"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment
Deftax (2026-04-11 21:22:13+00:00): Note: Jeśli zrobiłem coś źle jeśli chodzi o parkingi (jest to dosyć skomplikowane), to proszę napisać, wtedy to poprawię.