piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse (2024-08-16 10:18:16+00:00): Thanks both!
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-08-20 08:06:35+00:00): reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155495277
Le Petit Léo (2024-09-29 01:01:41+00:00): Bonjour chimel38,
Juste pour signaler un mauvais tag sur une voie d'accès à la maison du 18 rue du Patis : il faut mettre driveway et non alley. En effet ce dernier est un faux-amis en français et doit être utilisé pour une ruelle et non une allée. Voir le wiki : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:highway%3Dservice
Bonne journée
chimel38 (2024-09-29 06:56:03+00:00): Merci pour le rappel il est vrai que je n'ai pas accordé d'importance à ces particularités .... Bonne journée
mcliquid (2024-08-17 12:21:39+00:00): Hi and thank you for your contribution!

Please note for the future: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
Soshal Distan Singh (2024-08-15 02:24:55+00:00): Добрый день.

Просьба изучить:

[ 1 ] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Roof_modelling#Рисование_простых_контуров_здания

[ 2 ] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Использование_аэрофотоснимков

[ 3 ] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:level

[ 4 ] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:access (ну какие лошади в жилом квартале...)

[ 5 ] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:crossing

[ 6 ] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:footway%3Dsidewalk (не надо этот тег на все подряд тротуары ставить)

P.S. Дублировать адресную информацию на магазины, которые находятся внутри контура здания с уже известным адресом, необходимости нет.
compdude (2024-09-04 03:27:21+00:00): Thanks for your contributions! 

However, I noticed you mistakenly tagged long stretches of the R Line as being a bridge even though it is not on a bridge structure. I fixed it for you, but try to be more careful about this in the future. Thanks!!
red_pandas (2024-09-04 03:33:19+00:00): I appreciate the heads up and thank you for the review! The edits to the R Line were my first attempt at setting the max speed values. I realized, however, that I may have merged some segments that should not have been merged. I tried to be much more careful with the updates to the other light rail lines.
user_3022894 (2024-11-15 06:40:27+00:00): Hallo HippoHarald und willkommen!

Ich habe einen kleinen Hinweis für dich.

Du hast hier an mehreren Haltestellen, unter anderem am Hardenberger Hof und am drr Grenze Jagdhaus, public_transport=platform und highway=bus_stop als Punkte AUF Straßen gesetzt. Das ist jedoch nicht richtig. Der Typ "VRR-Bushaltestelle" sollte nur neben der Straße existieren.
Die Haltepositionen auf der Straße bekommen public_trandport=stop_position, nicht public_transport=platform. 
highway=bus_stop indes sollte pro Bussteig nur einmal vorhanden sein, in der Regel neben der Straße, nicht auf der Straße.
Eventuell hat dir der Editor hier aber auch etwas falsches zum Korrigeren "angeboten".

LG Lukas
aka Elefant
SomeoneElse (2024-08-15 08:45:42+00:00): You've said "Correcting designation to sign erected in 2022" but can we have a link to the sign?
You've changed https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/35030994/history from a UCR to a BOAT (both valid designations, though the tagging of the former varies).  If this really was a BOAT I'd expect it to be light red at https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#17/53.13297/-1.80330/H/P , but it isn't.  Has the status been changed recently?
SomeoneElse (2024-08-15 09:09:00+00:00): I'd suggest discussing these changes at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/undiscussed-changes-to-designation-in-england-and-wales/117463 .
Russ McD (2024-08-15 20:08:48+00:00): There was a Boat sign erected so I assumed it had been legally changed, however it still appears on the List of Streets as an "Unclassified highway" and can't find any record of the change in the Derbyshire CC records.  
OK in this instance mapping ground truth was probably wrong without further verification, so I'll change it to unclassifed_highway, and speak with my TRF friends up there to shed light on the sign, and confirm if still there.
Cheers
pacman541 (2024-08-15 05:50:32+00:00): Избыточная точка, обозначение кооператива уже есть: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23586968#map=18/56.81433/35.94116
A67-A67 (2024-10-29 22:39:00+00:00): Hoi emvee,

Ik zie dat je in deze wijziging de Westerweg weer op 50 km/h gezet hebt. Weet je zeker dat dat actueel is? Ik had deze snelheid verwijderd vanwege deze opmerking: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2900601
emvee (2024-10-31 06:52:39+00:00): Bedankt voor de heads-up, ga het aanpassen en zal wat meer informatie in de note plakken.
rskedgell (2024-08-15 07:00:37+00:00): The fixme says "Area is approximate - details to be clarified". It's a bit of a stretch to get from that to the area being "... land which was previously developed which is not currently in use. Brownfield land may be vacant or scheduled for future development."

The way you edited is actually part of a correctlt tagged landuse=residential multipolygon, https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12286304

I've reverted your edit.

You can read the documentation on landuse=residential and landuse=brownfield here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dresidential
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dbrownfield
mcliquid (2024-08-17 11:34:06+00:00): Hi and thank you for your contribution!

Please note for the future: changesets should be local.

In your case: Just upload more often in OsmAnd if possible.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
NorthCrab_upload (2024-08-14 20:20:33+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12111409278

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
SomeoneElse (2024-08-15 11:57:17+00:00): Hello,
I've already added this comment to several other "conflict changesets" here.

Accusing each other of vandalism and reverting changes without discussion won't get us anywhere. Please discuss these changes on the forum together. Tags already exist there for https://community.openstreetmap.org/tag/armenia and https://community.openstreetmap.org/tag/azerbaijan .

Best Regards,

Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group
vojtechzaboril (2024-08-15 08:26:52+00:00): Přestaňte chybně editovat odbočovací pruhy. Opět revertuji.
🇨🇿 Roman Horník (2024-08-21 14:18:00+00:00): OK, jak jsme se domluvili.
Sandal man (2024-08-14 21:58:52+00:00): Hello,
Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-)
But please make smalle change sets, this helps others in tracking changes. 
Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thank you.
JayTurnr (2024-08-14 20:54:58+00:00): Seems we were both editing the road at the same time, I'll do the cleanup :)
JayTurnr (2024-08-14 21:25:25+00:00): Heads up that `tactile_paving=yes` on a crossing way (highway=footway + footway=crossing) means tactile paving along the full length of the way, and not just at the edges. I saw you tagged a crossing with yes when it's actually no
Pete Owens (2024-08-14 23:02:44+00:00): That would make no sense.

Tactile paving is only ever used at the ends of a crossing to indicate to visually impaired  people that they are about to step onto the carriageway. See:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tactile_paving=yes
Sometimes crossings are not provided with this and sometimes the are - hence the tag. But tactile paving is never applied all the way across.
JayTurnr (2024-08-14 23:39:34+00:00): Actually in Austria, and I'm sure other places, tactile paving is used along the full length of the crossing. On the tag page for it, it does explicitly say not to use it on ways if it's only on the edges.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tactile_paving
JayTurnr (2024-08-14 23:43:02+00:00): To quote the wiki: On a pedestrian crossing highway=crossing, when the tactile paving is used in a line all across the crossing. Do not use tactile_paving=* on the way when only the two spots where the footway ends are paved differently.
JayTurnr (2024-08-14 23:44:43+00:00): Similarly, if two crossings nodes are separate, such as when a road splits in two around a traffic island, neither of them should have the crossing island tag because that's implied by them being separate nodes.
NieWnen (2024-08-14 20:57:21+00:00): Cześć,

jeśli jest to ciąg pieszo-rowerowy to wygląda to na błędne otagowanie, zapoznaj się proszę z tą sekcją na wiki (wcześniej też było błędnie jak coś)

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Rowery#Drogi_dla_pieszych_i_rower%C3%B3w

Jeśli jest to tylko droga rowerów z dopuszczeniem pieszych to jest prawie ok, tylko zbędny tag `bicycle`.

Edytor iD nie wspiera niestety poprawnego tagowania ścieżek rowerowych i trzeba edytować tagi ręcznie, bo jest to nieco rzecz regionalna (różne kraje w różny sposób je mapują).
Strubbl (2024-08-14 22:13:25+00:00): Ich hätte gedacht die von N kommende Fahrspur hat Vorfahrt und nicht die Auffahrtsspur
bwbuz (2024-08-15 09:29:36+00:00): Die Kennzeichnung einer Streckenführung mit "priority_road=designated" sagt nichts darüber hinaus wie die Vorwart an einer Einmündung geregelt ist...hierfür sind dann die entsprechenden Straßenschilder (welche hier ebenfalls gemappt werden können) ausschlaggebend. Zumal "trunk_link" der gleichen Straßenkategorie angehört und hier die gleichen Regeln gelten. Nur für den Fall, dass sich zuvor ein Schild "Vorwartstraße aufgehoben" befindet, sollte die Kennzeichnung "priority_road=designated" beendet werden. So meine bisherige Kenntnis und Interpretation.
bwbuz (2024-08-15 09:42:18+00:00): "Autobahn-Zubringer oder Autobahnanschlussstelle, typischerweise gelten die gleichen Verkehrsregeln wie auf Autobahnen selber." "Anschluss- oder Verbindungsrampe einer Schnellstraße, analog zu Autobahnanschlussrampe" --- siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:highway#Anschlussstellen
Strubbl (2024-08-18 14:20:17+00:00): Das Wiki an der Stelle https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:priority%20road?uselang=de meint, dass damit Straßen mit Vorfahrtszeichen gekennzeichnet werden. Dort steht für 
"priority_road=designated: Zeichen 306.svg Jeder Verkehrsteilnehmer kommt spätestens bei der ersten Kreuzung an einem Schild vorbei, welches den Weg als Vorfahrtsstraße kennzeichnet. Auf dem Weg gibt es keine Schilder, die die Vorfahrt beschränken (Vorfahrt gewähren, Stopp, rechts-vor-links)."
An solch einem Schild kommt man auf der Zufahrt ja nicht vorbei. Deswegen hätte ich die Zufahrt nicht als priority_road=designated gesehen.

Auch im Abschnitt "Kartierung" davor werden Zufahrten als idR. nicht zur Vorfahrt berechtigt beschrieben.
bwbuz (2024-08-18 15:08:05+00:00): Moin Strubbl, schon dein erster Hinweis hat mich nachdenklich gemacht und ich habe mir das ganze nochmal etwas intensiver angesehen. Ich bin nun auch deiner Meinung, das die "_link"-Anteile nicht mit priroity gemappt werden sollten. Ich habe das im betreffenden Teil schon entfernt und werde auch noch mal auf die Suche gehen, ob ich das fälschlicherweise auch noch anderswo so gemacht habe...die letzten Änderungen habe ich dabei schon so berücksichtigt. Danke für deine Hinweise! MfG Werner
Strubbl (2024-08-18 15:17:32+00:00): Danke für die Rückmeldung. Ich würde dieses Tagging auch gerne weiter verstehen und selber taggen. Ich bin mir aber im Moment noch zu unsicher, das in den mir bekannten Straßen zu ergänzen. Wenn du noch irgendwo eine gute Info findest, wäre ich sehr dankbar, wenn du mir da einen Link geben könntest.
Viele Grüße
NorthCrab_upload (2024-08-14 21:10:26+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/911491354

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
lisu_ml (2024-08-14 21:47:31+00:00): I wszystko stało się jasne. Dziękuję za pomoc, zmiany wprowadzone.
NorthCrab (2024-08-15 00:21:26+00:00): :-)
EP_Repair (2024-10-16 02:35:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 157944578 where the changeset comment is: Reverting changesets due to incorrect railway speed limit edits by a now-deleted user. Without source verification and based on local reports of errors, we are restoring prior data. Ticket#2024101510000176
Udarian (2024-08-15 14:17:11+00:00): Wouldn’t the homes here be more duplexes them townhomes (semidetached), and even if we stick with terraced houses I think the correct tag would more likely be house=terrace not house=terraced because terrace is for the outline and terraced is for when mapping the individual units. 

Happy mapping,
Udar.
notd3nny (2024-08-27 02:59:01+00:00): Fixed
divaddivag (2024-09-26 05:32:43+00:00): Salut Enzo, c'est vraiment chouette ton filaire piéton par contre c'est super sportif! Je ne suis pas à l'aise avec tout les tags et je n'ai pas envie d'introduire des choses incorrectes, difficiles à identifier plus tard. 
Je te propose dans l'immédiat de faire simple de mon coté:
1) highway=footway+footway=sidewalk/crossing avec la découpe (le plus chiant) au niveau des passage piéton
2) footway=* pour les résidences ou si éloigné de la route. Tu passes derrière moi pour compléter/vérifier pour que le schéma de tags soit cohérent avec le reste. 
Ce troncon est incorrect: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1307846269 . Je suppose que la driveway prend le pas la footway, c'est assez courant que la voie de service coincide (ou presque) avec le passage piéton.

What do you think? On peut en parler au tel si c'est plus simple. D
Nzau (2024-09-27 17:57:43+00:00): Salut David, merci pour ton retour !

Et effectivement je ne sais pas trop comment cartographier les filaires passages piétons/voie de service.

D'ailleurs ne t'en fais pas trop pour le filaire piéton, Jungle Bus devrait le faire sur Caen d'ici 6 mois un an normalement ^^
AurélienQ (2025-01-02 19:18:11+00:00): Bonjour,
Qu'est ce qui a motivé ton passage de tram vers voie ferrée légère ?
Jusqu'à preuve du contraire, le tram de Rouen n'est pas un tram-train... (et encore moins un métro, quoi qu'en disent les locaux 😉).
Bonne année,
Aurélien
patatate_douce (2025-01-02 19:34:47+00:00): Bonjour,
Je m'étais basé sur ces articles :
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Trams
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Dlight_rail
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Dsubway

C'est le light rail qui semblait coller le mieux aux définitions du wiki OSM.
AurélienQ (2025-01-02 20:15:56+00:00): Metro : n'a pas de passage à niveau
light_rail : "plus rapide que les trams" et "ne circulent pas à vue" 
Or ici on a bien une signalisation de tram (sauf dans le dépot, mais ça compte pas car c'esst normal), cf wikipédia (https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tramway_de_Rouen).
Conclusion : c'est un tram ;)
patatate_douce (2025-01-02 20:56:12+00:00): Pas de souci, pas d'opinion forte de mon côté, j'avais posé la question avant de faire le change et ça semblait plus approprié.
Il y a eu des modifs entre temps donc un bête revert va être compliqué. Je rechange le tout en tram.
patatate_douce (2025-01-02 21:19:20+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160926582
AurélienQ (2025-01-03 09:28:46+00:00): Nickel merci beaucoup.
Pour ma part c'est vrai que je peux être un peu têtu 😅, mais lorsqu'on me présente des arguments je les accepte.

Surtout le ferroviaire est un sujet qui me tient à cœur, donc j'aime bien quand c'est précis.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-05 12:30:11+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1307852467/history - co ta linia przedstawia?
eggie (2024-08-15 06:39:44+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Khidistavi (2024-08-15 06:23:21+00:00): Don't think that if you make several "constructive edits" your mystifications won't be reverted.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155267933
LateNightTone (2024-08-16 14:35:28+00:00): Hi midnight2024, I see you have altered a large section of the A92 in Arbroath to highway=construction, I assume in relation to note [4183658](https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4183658). Are you sure there is absolutely no access from one side of the town to the other, and the Guthrie Port Roundabout is entirely closed to traffic? As the changes you have made will currently stop GPS software routing road users along any of these roads. I have a hunch this needs to be mapped differently to take into account what access routes are still open on the ground, to ensure GPS road users are not affected.
eggie (2024-08-15 06:41:25+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
NorthCrab_upload (2024-08-14 23:30:35+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, zamień addr:place na addr:city. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/221521926

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Fizzie-DWG (2024-08-19 06:05:05+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16593
Udarian (2024-08-15 14:40:32+00:00): As mentioned previously I think it would be better to keep both in this situation, the tagging on the road and the area representing the area the street side parking actually takes up.

Happy mapping,
Udar
Udarian (2024-08-15 14:41:13+00:00): Why deleted these?
notd3nny (2024-08-18 16:20:15+00:00): Accident deletion
pitscheplatsch (2024-08-15 06:02:32+00:00): Just a test?
emersonveenstra (2024-08-18 12:01:12+00:00): Hi there,

If the roads are actually under construction, then you also need to change the highway tag to highway=construction (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dconstruction for more details) Would you mind fixing these? Thanks!
Jalium (2024-08-18 16:41:22+00:00): Thank you. Done.
Alexis Giraud-Courtney (2024-08-15 01:40:23+00:00): Farmland*
Tech Dec (2024-08-18 05:56:33+00:00): Hi Juveria Vasim and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
It appears you've changed Scrubby Creek from a stream into a canal lock. If you check the wiki, canal locks don't really match what's on the ground along Scrubby Creek. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lock
I'd suggest you check out the tags for rivers, creeks, and streams and change the tags over to a more suitable type.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:waterway
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/155264053
Tech Dec (2024-09-23 10:22:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted as Scrubby Creek is not a canal or canal lock. No reply on the original changeset 155264053 in over a month.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156988161
infeeeee (2024-08-16 11:08:03+00:00): Szia! Üdv az OpenStreetMapen!

Ezzel mit akartál jelölni? A 95-ös házszám már szerepelt a térképen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1720299607 
Ha rossz helyen van, akkor ezt húzd a megfelelő házhoz, ne hozz létre újat.

Ha az emeletet is jelölni akarod, akkor azt az addr:floor címkéhez kell adni. Itt vannak a legfontosabb tudnivalók a magyar címekről: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hungary/Jelölési_példák#Címek

De az emelet megadásának üzleteknél van jelentősége inkább. Ha azt akarod jelölni, hogy hány emeletes a ház, akkor azt a building:levels címkébe kell beírni: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_3D_Buildings

Ha kérdésed merülne fel, a magyar szerkesztő közösség elérhetőségeit megtalálod ezen az oldalon: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hungary/Közösség

További jó térképezést!
Joseph R P (2024-08-23 22:29:34+00:00): What are the reasons for the highway reclassifications you're making? Particularly why Route 23 was downgraded to secondary and the reasons for these new primary gaps and stubs around Phoenixville and Norristown.
Red0ctober22 (2024-08-23 22:36:29+00:00): These changes reflect PennDOT's official highway functional classification. On it, PA 23 is only considered a minor arterial highway (with the exception of a small portion of the road in Phoenixville). Under my understanding, a minor arterial state highway should then be considered a secondary road by OSM standards.
Joseph R P (2024-08-24 05:32:45+00:00): Functional classification doesn't exactly match 1-to-1 with OpenStreetMap's definitions of highways, and shouldn't be the source of classifying highways. It is difficult to generalize since it's a case-by-case basis, but, instead, we base road classification on how a highway serves from a connectivity standpoint and how it compares to other nearby highways, with secondary criteria like traffic data and physical characteristics sometimes playing a role in this process. When using this criteria is applied, it also avoids confusing dead-end primary routes like PA 113 in Phoenixville.

Around the East Coast, places tagged as towns like Leola and New Holland are typically linked to the road network with primary roads or higher (trunk/motorway). It may also be of reason to tag PA 29 from Phoenixville to Malvern as primary for this same reason, also considering its connections to motorways (the PA Turnpike and US Route 202).

The OSM Wiki has better explanations than I do for how highways are being classified, talking about specific classifications and why to avoid functional classification: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States/2021_Highway_Classification_Guidance
Red0ctober22 (2024-08-24 23:24:38+00:00): That sounds reasonable, sorry for the misunderstanding. I will admit that when reviewing PennDOT, highway classification, there were some cases that I disagreed with, but I was seeking to find a standardized method of determining road classification.
Joseph R P (2024-08-26 19:07:25+00:00): No worries! I'm going to restore some of the original highway classifications so that they conform with the US highway classification standards—at least for the time being. Thank your for cooperation and communication.
tyfi (2024-08-15 03:57:31+00:00): MO 5, MO 87, and MO 240 are all concurrent for a stretch south of Glasgow. That concurrency runs westward, and MO 240 continues over the Glasgow Bridge into the next county. MO 5 makes a northward turn into Glasgow at an intersection near a rail crossing, and MO 87 terminates at that intersection. MO 240 Business starts at that intersection and runs concurrently with MO 5 beneath the railroad into Glasgow. The bit underneath the railroad is what I modified here.
Tomas_J (2024-10-16 10:18:32+00:00): Hallo, you have market the "Bagh District -Haveli District" border line as a highway. This was clearly by mistake. I have corrected it. Have a good day.