piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
scai (2024-12-30 17:26:32+00:00): Hi Makkaroni_100,

du hast hier Gehwege eingezeichnet, diese aber an Anfang und Ende teilweise nicht mit der Straße verbunden, so dass kein Routing möglich ist. Das korrigiere ich gerade.

Auch waren diese Gehwege an den Straßen teilweise schon über das Tag sidewalk=* erfasst, so dass diese nun doppelt in den Daten vorhanden sind. Wenn du Gehwege separat einzeichnest, dann bitte via sidewalk=separate an der Straße kenntlich machen, dass die Gehwege separat erfasst sind. Dann gibt es auch keine Dopplungen :)

Grüße
Alex
scai (2024-12-30 17:37:25+00:00): Letzteres habe ich nun auch korrigiert und die sidewalk-Tags entsprechend angepasst/ergänzt.
Makkaroni_100 (2025-01-01 23:12:57+00:00): Danke, ja, das sollte man vorher immer schauen. Da schleichen sich leider schnell Fehler ein.

Gruß
Makkaroni
Xvtn (2024-02-10 19:39:23+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes here. Nice job fixing the incorrect oneway. Regarding turning left onto Hahns Peak Drive, I looked at the data and don't see anything that might prevent turning to go south. Can you give more info on the navigation system you're using? Here's a test using the routing engine OSRM, everything looks ok to me: https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_car&route=40.40905%2C-105.00973%3B40.40739%2C-105.01861#map=17/40.40858/-105.01527
WhoIsThis505 (2024-02-13 04:25:38+00:00): Hello and thanks for looking at that change for me. I use the navigation system built into my Tesla, it's my understanding that while they use Google maps, they use OpenStreetMaps for navigation, which is why I'm here trying to update the problems I've encountered with my city.
tekim (2024-02-15 20:05:56+00:00): I would also like to welcome you to OSM from a fellow Lovelander!  In OSM oneway=no is assumed on roads, we only tag add the oneway tag if the road is oneway.  If adding oneway=no was necessary to make your navigation software work, it seems like an error in that software.
canfe (2024-02-10 08:44:42+00:00): Hai nuovamente cancellato la parte iniziale del nome di molte località e piccoli borghi.

Qui i tuoi recenti changeset 147278880 147278822 147278798 147278658

Non hai mai risposto alla mia richiesta di un link alla regola che sostieni di esistere.
CS 145780228

Ti ho invitato a discutere la questione sul gruppo nazionale ma ti sei rifiutato.
CS 146342830

Come esempio ti faccio la Borgata Baima che tu ti ostini a mappare come sola “Baima”. Ha ben due cartelli stradali ufficiali del Comune di San Carlo Canavese che la nominano così.
https://westnordost.de/p/193772.jpg
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=45.253115122969&lng=7.5888471597793&z=17&focus=photo&pKey=477248693556595 
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=45.25019080000001&lng=7.597815100001185&z=19.859273377447458&focus=photo&pKey=3505409073104606&x=0.5630791489672475&y=0.4896030710517873&zoom=0.2785515320334262

Io mi attengo alle regole ufficiali della comunità italiana
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Editing_Standards_and_Conventions#Mappa_quello_che_c'%C3%A8_sul_terreno

Ti invito per l’ultima volta a porre la questione sul forum nazionale italiano in modo da confrontarti con altri mappatori.
Fedurli (2024-02-10 23:51:08+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:name
Direi che questo è più appropriato;
Dopodiché la cartellonistica che ti ostini a postare è chiara "Borgata" appare in un font più piccolo rispetto a "Baima", escludendo quindi che "Borgata" faccia parte del nome proprio; se poi non ti è sufficiente, il sito del comune di San Carlo è ancora più chiaro, non riportando alcuna dicitura "Borgata".
Ma parlando di cartelli, dove vedi "Frazione Vauda", "Frazione Ponte Masino" (che tra l'altro è una zona della frazione Vauda, non una frazione una frazione a sé stante), "Località Vigna", "Località Vastalla", "Località Vauda" (Grosso)? Tutte diciture che nei cartelli non appaiono.
Dunque, visto che sei tu che vuoi andare contro le regole ufficiali, prova tu ad aprire una discussione sul forum e chiedere che le regole vengano cambiate; a me stanno bene così, il nome della località deve contenere solo il nome proprio e non il nome comune, come è ovunque in Italia, eccetto dove ci hai messo mano tu.
tastrax (2024-02-11 10:24:53+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
MxxCon (2024-02-11 05:09:52+00:00): Hello.
what are you mapping here?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147278818
❤️‍🔥 (2024-02-11 11:48:24+00:00): Hi, I created a wiki page which I hope explains what this tag is about: https://osm.wiki/Key:exit:carriages 

It's the same idea as the nyc "exit stategy" app, which is ranked #27 on the app store so it seems like a lot of people find this idea useful
MxxCon (2024-02-11 05:19:55+00:00): hours=none is not a valid OSM tag.
If that toilet doesn't work, I think it's better to just add disused: prefix to the amenity tag rather than write it out in the description tag.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147278844
Vonter (2024-02-10 06:21:55+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap! 

Congrats on your first contributions to OpenStreetMap! 

As OpenStreetMap is a collaborative project, any documents used as sources need to be publicly accessible. The shared Google Docs link does not seem to be accessible to everyone, so it should not be used as a source.

Additionally, names added to OpenStreetMap need to match the official name as displayed on a board. As the names of the residential areas do not officially include the word "slum", it should not be added in OpenStreetMap. Hence, I have reverted this incorrect name change.

If you’re interested in discussing further, do consider joining the regional OSM Bengaluru group:

Telegram: https://telegram.me/OSM_BLR

Matrix: https://matrix.to/#/#OSM_BLR:matrix.org

Happy Mapping!
arjunaraoc (2024-03-04 09:25:30+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Issue resolved through revert by another editor
felipeeugenio (2024-02-10 20:26:11+00:00): Hola, por favor hacer ediciones pequeñas. Una cosa puntual y de ahí grabar. Es más facil revisar después y en caso de tener que deshacer algo se puede trabajar sobre un cambio localizado. no todo regado por todo Santiago.

Gracias
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147279151
est_4391 (2024-02-12 16:32:25+00:00): Gracias por el comentario, soy nuevo aca asi que para las proximas modificaciones lo haré.
desertivy (2024-02-10 10:41:11+00:00): Hello LockOnGuy, 
 
This street is known as 77th Street "شارع 77" regardless if it's just the road number. Us local people and even the government refer to it by that name as shown by the following references: 
 
Ministry of Planning: https://mop.gov.iq/archives/13805 
 
Department of Roads and Bridges: https://turruqjissor.moch.gov.iq/2023/06/25/%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%A6%D8%B1%D8%A9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B7%D8%B1%D9%82-%D8%AA%D9%88%D8%A7%D8%B5%D9%84-%D8%A7%D8%B9%D9%85%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%87%D8%A7-%D9%84%D9%8A%D9%84%D8%A7-%D9%88%D9%86%D9%87%D8%A7%D8%B1%D8%A7// 
 
Baghdad Governorate: https://baghdad.gov.iq/tenders/5808.html 
 
Ministry of Construction, Housing, Municipalities and Public Works: https://www.moch.gov.iq/news/%D9%88%D8%B2%D8%A7%D8%B1%D8%A9%20%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A5%D8%B9%D9%85%D8%A7%D8%B1%20%D8%AA%D9%88%D8%A7%D8%B5%D9%84%20%D8%A3%D8%B9%D9%85%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%87%D8%A7%20%D9%84%D9%8A%D9%84%D9%8B%D8%A7%20%D9%86%D9%87%D8%A7%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%8B%20%D9%81%D9%8A%20%D9%85%D8%B4%D8%B1%D9%88%D8%B9%20%D9%85%D8%AC%D8%B3%D8%B1%20%D8%B1%D8%A8%D8%B7%20%D8%B4%D8%A7%D8%B1%D8%B9%20%D8%AA%D9%82%D8%A7%D8%B7%D8%B9%20%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%82%D8%AF%D8%B3%20%E2%80%93%20%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B9%D8%A8%D9%88%D8%B1%20%D8%A8%D8%AC%D8%A7%D9%86%D8%A8%20%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B1%D8%B5%D8%A7%D9%81%D8%A9%20%D9%81%D9%8A%20%D8%A8%D8%BA%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%AF 
 
Mayoralty of Baghdad: https://www.facebook.com/mayoralty.baghdad/videos/380796574228101/ 
 
Its official name is Ameen/Amin Street "شارع الأمين". It is not an abbreviation for Muhammad al-Amin; it was named that because it passes by Al Ameen quarter "حي الامين", which was named after Muhammad al-Amin, as can be shown in this map by the Mayoralty of Baghdad that shows the official name use: https://web.archive.org/web/20240110201616/https://api.amanatbaghdad.gov.iq/images/bfeea80c-715b-4b12-b176-66ffc5a16434.jpg 
 
A road number or "ref=" being 77 is not enough for people to know or recognize that street by its famous well-known name, which is 77th Street. 
 
As the wiki says, "if fewer people use a name in practice, even if it is signposted, it is better to put the official name in official_name=* or alt_name=* than to treat it as the primary name".
LockOnGuy (2024-02-10 10:54:45+00:00): Hi,     
The map you sent above https://web.archive.org/web/20240110201616/https://api.amanatbaghdad.gov.iq/images/bfeea80c-715b-4b12-b176-66ffc5a16434.jpg by Baghdad Municipality say "Ameen Street" not 77th street.      
You told me previously that a guy from Baghdad Municipality sent you official maps made by the Baghdad Municipality, please check them, and you can see that the name of the street is Ameen Street and there might include the number of the street next to it just the number "77" without saying "77th street"         
And this street name is +50 year old. I'm also local, and I did heard people say "77th street" yes, but that doesn't mean that is the name of it. I also heard people say "Ameen Street" maybe even more though, and since the 77th street is just the road number, it shall be in the number tag, and the street name be in the name tag. There is no harm to have "77th Street" in alt_name even though it is not a name.         
Regards.
desertivy (2024-02-11 10:57:34+00:00): The purpose of the map I sent is to clarify the official name usage of this street, which is "Ameen Street," and to correct any misunderstanding that it might be an abbreviation for "Muhammad al-Amin". It's important to acknowledge that all government references and local people consistently use "77th Street" when referring to this street as can be seen by the refrences I provided in my previous message, a fact that appears to have been overlooked in your response.

Given this, it is imperative that "77th Street" be recognized as the primary name of the road on OpenStreetMap. The evidence supporting the usage of "77th Street" by both the government and the local people is undeniable and significant. Therefore, relegating "77th Street" to anything less than the primary name does a disservice to the accuracy and reliability of the map for its users. "Ameen Street," while historically significant, does not reflect the current, predominant usage and should therefore be listed as an alt_name.
LockOnGuy (2024-02-11 11:06:28+00:00): If you think that the name shall be only “al-Ameen Street” not with the full name of the subject person, no problem. We already have a similar case like “al-Rashid Street”.     
Now about the using the street number as a name and move the street name to alt_name I’m strongly against that as 77 is the number of the street and if people referred to the street as 77 that doesn’t mean it’s name, just it’s number. And since the street name is over 50 years old and still not changed it’s necessary for it to be in name, and the street number can be in the ref tag.         
Regards.
user_12523467 (2024-02-11 18:11:20+00:00): @desertivy couldn't agree more. as Baghdad municipality actually uses "شارع 77" , the other names such as "الأمين" and what else, are outdated names no one local use it on the ground.
this street should be tagged with name=شارع 77,
same as the locals call it. and with tag alt_name=الأمين
exactly as it is, without adding explanatory name. please stick to the official naming no need for additions.
LockOnGuy (2024-02-11 18:21:55+00:00): >Baghdad municipality actually uses "شارع 77"
No, Baghdad Municipality say it’s “al-Ameen Street” and its present in the Baghdad Municipality map above as “al-Ameen Street”     
@desertivy you have official neighborhood maps from the Municipality, share them here so we see hoe it’s written on them.      
It’s as simple as that, street name be in ‘name’ and street number be in ‘ref’ or alt_name.
user_12523467 (2024-02-11 18:41:19+00:00): @LockOnGuy it seems that you are not a local in this area, you should update your info, a simple search on the internet will make you informed and catching up with the locals, here are some official sources and news about this street name "شارع 77" :

https://nnciraq.com/138194/
https://shorturl.at/hipt8
https://shorturl.at/aBCGU
LockOnGuy (2024-02-11 19:18:33+00:00): Lamassu, Actually I'm the local here since I live in this city, in the eastern part of Baghdad City to be exact, while you live in al-Mahmudiyah town south of Baghdad City. We both know this fact and established it previously. Same goes for the user desertivy, who live in al-Ma'aml, north east of Baghdad, outside the boundaries of Baghdad city https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5638803.       
     
And, for us, the locals, in the city, we always call it by it's name for me and the people I know. Some might call it by it's number, and that's not wrong. We shall not name it by it's number, it shall be by the actual street name that is over 50 year old and still officially used as proven above in the map by Baghdad Municipality. It's not changed to "Street 77" as a name. So, at the end, name of the street in 'name', number of the street in 'ref', and also no harm to have it in 'alt_name' if you insist that the street number can be treated as a name.          
     
Here is a map of Baghdad from Baghdad Municipality showing the street name: https://amanatbaghdad.gov.iq/ar/news/9d116041-df40-4f38-837d-666b24a22743 and also your friend, the user 'desertivy' have many other official maps made by the Baghdad Municipality for the neighborhoods, it was givin to him by a guy who work at the Municipality, and all of them has the name "al-Ameen Street".    
     
Now, I'm gonna change the name of the street to the short name without the full name of the subject as per the notes of user 'desertivy'. Keep in mind there is the same full name for other streets in Iraq in other cities, for example in Karbala https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/665891734 , I will not change that.     
Regards.
user_12523467 (2024-02-11 19:33:11+00:00): You have NO right to say where I live!!
 This is a MAJOR PRIVACY EXPOSE!!
Very bad practice of you.
desertivy (2024-02-11 19:42:34+00:00): @LockOnGuy, exposing where I live? Really? Is that how low you're going? That's absolutely unacceptable. It is a violation of my privacy and safety.
LockOnGuy (2024-02-11 19:45:13+00:00): @Lamassu You stated that previously in the official Iraq OSM group before you were kicked out. And all members knows from what town you are, as you kept telling everyone that and kept speaking about the services in your town etc.    
And, how ironic that you say such thing when you went and said in the public telegram group that I'm I'm "afiliated with the United States regime" etc. and such words for sure can get you killed in Iraq, as it killed many people before like Reham Yacoub for example.       
I'm done here.
LockOnGuy (2024-02-11 19:46:22+00:00): Same goes for you, @desertivy you publicly stated that in OSM Iraq group and every member knows it as you also kept telling stories about your area in the group.         
Don't act surprised.     
Again, I'm done here.
user_12523467 (2024-02-11 19:54:47+00:00): @LockOnGuy this is outrageous, you keep claiming false accusations, then pretending to be the victim while deliberately exposing users locations in a Public Changeset!!, I don't feel safe anymore on  OSM, thanks to you. this my last entry here. I'm deleting my account.
LockOnGuy (2024-02-11 20:00:34+00:00): @Lamassu keep in mind I only mentioned the town that you said you live in to other 170 members in the public Iraq community group, and also you previously mentioned it's your town and you have local knowledge in your earlier changesets in OSM.            
Peace.
LockOnGuy (2024-02-11 20:15:54+00:00): 
* https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/107132956
* https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/107133105      
etc...
BaghdadiMapper (2024-02-11 20:43:18+00:00): @Lamassu You have no right accuse other users for "making false accusations" when you yourself have made several false allegations against LockOnGuy saying he was "an American citizen" and "working for the embassy" on public OSM Telegram groups to make yourself look like a victim. You have to stop this child's play. Plus, it's very easy to figure out where you live without any secret insider knowledge as a good fraction of your edits are in Mahmoudiya, even stating in a couple of them that you're a local.
LockOnGuy (2024-02-11 20:50:55+00:00): @BaghdadiMapper he want to say this then report again to the DWG. If he actually don't want to say where he live, he shall never say it publicly in OSM telegram group to hundreds of mappers, or at least not say it on his changeset comment here in OSM, or even better, not to map his own house as 3D building on OSM.
woodpeck (2024-02-15 15:53:48+00:00): The DWG has received complaints about this changesets saying that someone's privacy was violated and/or there have been death threats. I think these claims are a wild over-reaction; as far as I can see, the places mentioned here have several hundred thousand inhabitants so "mapper X lives in city Y" is not really telling anyone anything new. Please don't waste DWG's time by organising smear campaigns against individuals. If you cannot work together for the best of OSM, then all of you should leave OSM and make room for people who can.
LockOnGuy (2024-02-15 15:57:21+00:00): Thank you dear Frederik Ramm, Indeed and I agree 100%.     
Best Regards.
woodpeck (2024-02-15 16:02:24+00:00): The "all of you" was including you though, LockOnGuy ;)
LockOnGuy (2024-02-15 16:11:11+00:00): Of course dear Frederik , all clear! I believe in communications and cooperation, as it's crucial here. DWG report should be the last resort when there is no solution in discussions.  Thanks again!
desertivy (2024-02-16 11:17:37+00:00): @woodpeck

Firstly, we want to assure you that our actions were not intended as part of a smear campaign against any individual. Our primary concern was to highlight what we perceived as problematic behavior that could potentially impact the well-being and privacy of community members. We believe in the importance of a safe and respectful environment for all OSM contributors, especially in Iraq, which, as you may know, is not necessarily the safest country in the world.

I personally do not want my location to be public regardless. I shared it with the OSM Iraq admins group, which consisted of 4 people, and these users have no right to disclose that in public. This breach of privacy is part of what motivated our actions, emphasizing the need for respectful handling of personal information within our community.

Moreover, the main reason for this discussion revolves around the issue with the naming of 77th St, which remains unresolved. This led us to seek the DWG's intervention for that reason after a long discussion with the user that led to nothing useful, according to all the sources and references mentioned above that have been overlooked.

We recognize, however, that our approach may have been misinterpreted and could have inadvertently caused undue alarm or concern. We apologize if this was the case and for any inconvenience it may have caused the DWG. It was not our intention to waste valuable resources or detract from the DWG's important work.

Regards.
honeyimappedthekids (2026-01-07 02:19:06+00:00): what???
Mathias_ADAV (2024-06-04 07:50:45+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai remis les chemins du parc Henri Matisse en footway et bicycle = yes, car ce ne sont pas des voies vertes, ce sont avant tout des chemins piétons.
philippec (2024-02-10 20:19:30+00:00): U kunt nog de entrance toevoegen.
fortera_au (2024-02-10 10:03:08+00:00): Hi, is the name of this actually suffixed with -National Trust? It's already in the operator tag (albeit misspelled).
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147279800
MxxCon (2024-02-11 05:16:28+00:00): If you don't know the hours, just don't specify them or include fixme= tag indicating that. No need to write that out in the description tag...
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147280420
IraGersh (2024-02-11 14:54:19+00:00): Ok,  I found out the the marina toilet the parks guy told me about was locked at 1:45pm so I assume its seasonal.  Should I put a fixme tag there also.  Like parks water fountains, toilets in unheated buildings are never unlocked between frost dates.  Generally parks toilet hours are capricious.  They are unlocked and locked at unexpected times.  I tried this toilet in the Parks building at about 4pm when I expected it should be unlocked and it was locked.
Imran R Amin (2024-08-11 04:29:38+00:00): নামটা কেরমতলি নয়, শুদ্ধু নাম হবে কেরুনতলি Keruntali.
এই নামে একটা সরকারি প্রাথমিক বিদ্যালয় আছে।

ধন্যবাদ
fortera_au (2024-02-12 00:38:27+00:00): Hey there, is the house actually named Lincoln 69? There's a tag addr:housename that's available, but it's also is unusual for houses to have both a number and name from what I've seen.

I'd also recommend using the Q keyboard shortcut in iD/JOSM to square off buildings where possible.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147281876
user_14538650 (2024-02-10 12:48:15+00:00): happy tết!
TrickyFoxy (2024-02-11 22:40:50+00:00): Не вносите личные заметки в OSM. Используйте для них Метки
eggie (2024-02-10 08:00:31+00:00): Dag superver   Je vraagt feedback  .. Wanneer er een bord Woonerf staat is het uiteraard oke. Staat dat er werkelijk bij een school? 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-02-10 08:02:26+00:00): En wanneer staat aangegeven Verboden Toegang art 461 wvs dan access private toevoegen. Het zal dan overigens niet meer routeren.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-02-10 08:08:01+00:00): em alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-02-10 08:39:14+00:00): Met de wegklasse Woonerf staat alles nu ook open voor autoverkeer. Is dat werkelijk zo in een fietsenstalling. Is het geen voetgangersgebied waar fietsen ook is toegestaan?
user_20983513 (2024-02-10 12:33:38+00:00): Wat een geneuzel, je wordt er gewoon af gebonjourd door de concierges. pff.
eggie (2024-02-10 12:48:37+00:00): Maar nu de hamvraag...  Wat is de status van de het pad naar de school en de fietsenstalling? Woonerf?
eggie (2024-02-10 13:20:40+00:00): Ik heb er voorlopig highway=path van gemaakt en een fietspad verbinding gemaakt met de JF Kennedylaan. 
Groet
eggie
eggie (2024-02-10 08:06:42+00:00): Dag superver...   Dan is access=desitnation voldoende als er een bord staat Alleen Toegang voor aanwonenden oid. . De rest van de accesstags kan weg.
Staat er een bord  Verboden toegang .. dan access=private .
MVG
eggie
user_17222985 (2024-02-10 08:27:03+00:00): https://storage.googleapis.com/svoi-upload/92/181264/%D0%94%D0%BE%D0%B4%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%BA-%D0%B4%D0%BE-%D1%80%D1%96%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8F_%D0%BF%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B9%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D1%83%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8F-%D0%B2%D1%83%D0%BB%D0%B8%D1%86%D1%8C.pdf