piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
watmildon (2026-03-05 05:47:15+00:00): Some folks in the OSM-US slack were trying to sort out why the Colville Native Reservation wasn't rendering any more. I took a stab and getting it fixed up but we won't get a new low zoom render for some time.

Something to keep an eye on I suppose.

https://osmus.slack.com/archives/C1FKE1NCA/p1772684789963059

My change: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179379202#map=12/48.3720/-119.5622
MappingMore (2026-02-28 09:58:26+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:179163848
Grass-snake (2026-02-25 20:23:43+00:00): Здравствуйте, ознакомьтесь, пожалуйста, с классификацией дорог:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:highway

Тег embankment=yes используется для обозначения на насыпей, здесь явно её нет.
MappingMore (2026-02-28 08:11:28+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:179161329, 179118846
tyfi (2026-02-25 06:22:00+00:00): The "North" directional prefix is also fine here, but I don't see it in open county GIS data so omitted it. I didn't bother checking if TIGER still had it, probably does. Did STL county drop its locator grid?
sanddune (2026-02-26 04:40:58+00:00): Hi Cimera2, thank you for making these changes. I've noticed two issues: 
1. On the way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/275008614. The value "indistinct" is not a valid value for the key "highway". It should remain as "highway=path". Have a look at the trail_visibility key https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:trail_visibility.
2. The direction of the way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1482779253 should be revered so that the direction follows the flow of the water.

Thanks :)
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-28 03:22:04+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/321783295

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Linus W Frische (2026-03-07 14:14:48+00:00): Du er nødt til at være omhygglig når du bruger iDs valideringssystem. Se f.eks. denne node: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/881951447

Det er en Wash World(https://washworld.dk/) som du har rettet til brand=wash branch=world. Det er jo åbenlyst forkert tagging. Ret det venligst.

Sænk farten og dine ændringer igennem inden du uploader dem næste gang.

PS: Hvad du laver her kunne måske betegnes som automatisk rettelser, og dermed er de underlagt https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits#Standard_editors
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-28 03:22:15+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1001076916

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
RobotFK (2026-02-25 07:04:03+00:00): Source, Lokales wissen und Website
MappingMore (2026-02-25 10:46:45+00:00): Revert of 178984113
NeisBot (2026-02-25 07:24:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/9691703717 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Trading office"

#MapWithoutSpam
pitscheplatsch (2026-02-25 11:35:18+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179023268
pitscheplatsch (2026-02-25 11:35:24+00:00): Spam
NeisBot (2026-02-25 07:24:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/11033660648 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Trading office"

#MapWithoutSpam
pitscheplatsch (2026-02-25 11:35:43+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179023241
pitscheplatsch (2026-02-25 11:35:48+00:00): Spam
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-28 03:22:18+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1394958124

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
FajrAl (2026-02-26 14:20:13+00:00): Halo, selamat datang di OSM. Untuk penambahan dan perubahan data di OSM, dilarang ada data pribadi seseorang seperti nama pemilik rumah.
MappingMore (2026-02-28 09:02:55+00:00): Revert of 179016133
pitfire (2026-02-25 08:23:29+00:00): Hallo Wanderfalter,

danke für Deinen Beitrag, aber 
es fehlt: healthcare=podiatrist. Mit diesem Schlüssel werden Einrichtungen gekennzeichnet, die Teil des Gesundheitswesens sind. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:healthcare%3Dpodiatrist

VG pitfire
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-28 03:22:22+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1432738963

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-25 09:39:33+00:00): This building has been redrawn incorrectly. You can review OSM guidelines for creating adjacent buildings with a proper structure. Repeating this incorrect structure creates inconsistent data.
Scout Jens (2026-04-24 14:52:09+00:00): ja, un des ist ein sandbunker
Scout Jens (2026-04-24 15:00:06+00:00): was genau hat Dich daran gestört?
geozeisig (2026-04-25 06:28:50+00:00): Ein golf=bunker ist immer mit Sand gefüllt.

natural=sald solltte nicht zusätzlich hinzugefügt werden.

Siehe auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course

"Vermeide die Verwendung des Merkmals landuse=* oder natural=* zur Angabe der Oberfläche."
Scout Jens (2026-04-26 09:59:15+00:00): Ah, OK. Danke
kartler175 (2026-04-04 11:20:38+00:00): Eine Stromleitung ist keine Fläche(Multipolygon)!
FraukeLeo (2026-06-30 17:28:27+00:00): Hier wurde parallel zur A5 in Bensheim eine Reihe von Freileitungsmasten auf unmögliche Positionen geschoben, hatte das einen Grund oder kann das wieder zurück?
FraukeLeo (2026-06-30 17:30:18+00:00): Zum Beispiel https://osm.org/node/364123037 steht jetzt auf der Autobahn, der war vorher 110 m nordöstlich am Seeufer, auf dem Luftbild ist er auch noch da
MajorTomMueller (2026-06-30 17:42:49+00:00): Das sollte nicht so sein. Verschieben war nicht beabsichtigt.
Eine Teil der Hochspannungsleitung wurde zurück gebaut, das ist auf den Luftbildern noch nicht zu sehen. 
Die Trasse 4504 wurde zwischen Juni 2024 und Februar 2026 zurück gebaut.
Eine andere Trasse umgebaut. Und teilweise mit einer der neuen Trasse 2204 Griesheim Weinheim zusammengelegt.
Bin gerade nicht in der Gegend und kann daher nicht direkt Vorort schauen.
FraukeLeo (2026-06-30 17:48:48+00:00): Ich lass das dann mal so, damit wir nicht hin und her schieben, es schadet ja nicht viel. Aber es wäre schön, wenn du das bald auf den Stand bringen könntest, also entweder wieder richtig hinschieben oder löschen, was abgebaut ist.
pitscheplatsch (2026-02-25 08:49:06+00:00): Hi,

may we know the reason behind renaming the following way: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/111567668

from "бул. Владислав Варненчик" to "I-2"?

Thanks.
teodordt (2026-02-25 09:08:03+00:00): Because this is the real name (identification, ID) of the road. Blvd.Vladislav Varnenchik starts at the point, where the motorway A2 overs - in the beginning of Varna and pass through the city till the center (to the Cathedral). I just clean the confusion.
Dimitar155 (2026-02-26 13:00:51+00:00): "I-2" is not the name of road. "I-2" is it's reference number since it is part of the first class road network. This is already represented using the ref=* tag on the road segments and the road relation - relation/269567.
teodordt (2026-02-26 13:43:13+00:00): And it is better to leave it as "I-2" instead the wrong "Blvd.Vladislav Varnenchik". It is not Vladialav Varnenchik.
Dimitar155 (2026-02-26 17:47:14+00:00): I see that but this information is already marked in two different ways. There is no need to have it marked a third way which is why I suggest to just leave it unnamed.
stasiu512 (2026-02-25 09:12:18+00:00): Cześć, to nie jest Witomino - https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5325975844
Speed Seed (2026-02-25 09:21:03+00:00): Faktycznie, już poprawione
NeisBot (2026-02-25 09:18:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/7304429303 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Restaurante chino"
---
Por ejemplo, una versión más neutral y objetiva de tu texto podría ser: "Restaurante chino"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-03-05 17:33:02+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/179040078
eggie (2026-02-25 09:37:45+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  Realiseer je dat ook je testen gewoon in de data van OSM terecht komen.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-02-25 09:39:40+00:00): reverted by changeset #179027204
MappingMore (2026-02-28 09:44:47+00:00): Revert of 179025913
NeisBot (2026-02-25 09:33:55+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13597585098 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Lawn care office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-05 17:33:02+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179408167
(No visible changes after review)
Busaiolis (2026-03-21 12:09:42+00:00): Ciao, ti scrivo perché avevi aggiunto (probabilmente per errore) alcuni elementi inesistenti, tra cui questo percorso pedonale: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1482821467. Per intenderci, avevi collegato il livello in trincea dell'ingresso est di M2/M4 con il marciapiede sovrastante (da cui è separato da almeno 4 m in altezza). Ho già provveduto io a sistemare la situazione, ma per il futuro ti consiglio di mappare solo elementi che conosci bene o di cui tu abbia rilevato l'effettiva presenza.
Ted Pottage (2026-03-03 18:49:09+00:00): Location reopened as Reigate Daily, a Convenience store, in early January, new photos had already uploaded on Wheelmap.
New node created 3/3/2026
Baloo Uriza (2026-03-04 01:23:10+00:00): Great work, though it would be helpful to pedestrians if you also included the street names on the sidewalks.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179027094
Vis_M (2026-03-08 20:37:12+00:00): Please split your edits into different changesets to smaller geographical area. Also, please follow https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India/Tags/Highway & https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala-MDR for road classification
mrkusypl (2026-02-25 11:08:11+00:00): Dodałem te nakazy do skrętu, ponieważ występują one na tych drogach, ale rozumiem wycofanie zmian i szanuję.
Marek-M (2026-02-25 11:26:54+00:00): Dane drogowe na liniach `highway` tutaj wystarczają do wymuszenia odpowiednich kierunków jazdy bez dodatkowych relacji. Jeżeli chcesz mapować znaki, to można dodać w miejscu ich posadowienia dodać dodatkowy punkt z tagowaniem `traffic_sign=*` https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Znaki_drogowe_w_Polsce#Sam_fizyczny_znak
leveskockaa (2026-03-20 07:33:58+00:00): Hello!

Next time you map a new business opening in place of an old one, please reuse the node of the old business (in this case, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6447258236) so that the history (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6447258236/history) is visible and provides other mappers with the extra information needed to decide if it's an error, or their information is outdated. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1758991234/history is a good example of the node history being accessible and providing more information.
tux67 (2026-02-25 12:03:42+00:00): Du hast keine Quelle angegeben .. aber ich vermute dir ist nicht bekannt, das hier zur Zeit 2 Schulen am Standort sind? Die GHS Kirschhecke schließt 2027, das Berufskolleg Rheydt-Mülfort für Wirtschaft und Verwaltung ist schon größtenteils hier eingezogen (und heißt zukünftig „Berufskolleg am Tiergarten“ ). Dessen alter Standort an der Bruchstraße wird gerade von der Gesamtschule Rheydt-Mülfort übernommen.
Von daher ist das ganze Gelände nicht (mehr) GHS.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179027449
m_fuhrmann (2026-02-25 12:32:28+00:00): Steht er nicht mehr da? Ich könnte mir vorstellen, dass der Tisch nur im Sommer da steht. Oder halt immer mal wo anders.
NeisBot (2026-02-25 09:48:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13597646315 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Asphalt paving company"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-05 17:33:05+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179408170
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
rarad74 (2026-02-25 10:22:06+00:00): You must learn to use ID. ID is ten time easyer to use and was made by dedicated openstreetmap programmers. We dont have time to check what you do on the map. Then if you stiil want to use Go Map, please dont edit anymnore here. Thanks.
woodpeck (2026-03-13 11:46:36+00:00): Dear openstreetmapbuddy, dear rarad74 - please tune it down a litte. "Go Map" is a valid editor and you are certainly allowed to use it. However, as with any editor on a small screen, some types of edits might be more difficult to make and some types of errors can happen more easily. @openstreetmapbuddy, don't explain how you are sorry in your changeset comment, instead explain what you have edited. If someone else points out mistakes that you have made, try to avoid these mistakes the next time you edit.  @rarad74, please point out the actual problems so that openstreetmapbuddy can learn. They won't learn from you shouting abuse at them and we will not tolerate that. If you have pointed out a certain problem to openstreetmapbuddy and they STILL repeat the same mistakes, let the DWG know and we'll intervene. -- DWG Ticket#2026031310000331
rarad74 (2026-03-13 11:57:40+00:00): There are several blocks on him.. Here you have a ticket about the problem. [Ticket#2025122210000344] It seems openstreetmapbuddy din't listen my/ recommandations and help and DWG recomandation provided in the first time and repeatedly. This look like he mock us. He leaves unconnected nodes, add changes that does not reflect reality, did not use openstreetmap tags ( he probabluy invented some). At the beggining of his edits i would gladdly help him, but didn't take in considerations what i tell him. So, i am enough with this "sharade". You can read all the talks in pervious tickets  and block comments from Clifford Snow. Have a good day!
eggie (2026-02-25 10:07:33+00:00): Beste,
Zaken die niet kloppen en dus niet correct zijn niet toevoegen aan OSM. Ook niet als je dat later wil reverten.
De editor van osm is niet geschikt om zaken uit te testen.
Mvg,
eggie
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-25 12:04:07+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1429965902/history

do grade3?
NeisBot (2026-02-25 10:15:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 10 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1482834896 v1 | 4 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1482834903 v1 | 3 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/8522140580 v2
https://osm.org/node/8522140538 v2
https://osm.org/node/9816905619 v4

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179028630
NeisBot (2026-02-25 10:18:53+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13597710003 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Packaging supplier building"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-05 17:33:07+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179408174
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
Ale_Zena_IT (2026-02-25 13:40:02+00:00): Hello,
I see a big number of edits, with many changes and deletions.
Could you explain us (to me and the italian community) what's going on in these area?
Thank you
vojtechzaboril (2026-02-25 13:44:22+00:00): Hi,
I just improved the geometry of roads from current Bing Aerial Imagery (I can see I didn't put Bing to sources of this changeset, sry). I fixed a lot of ways by redrawing it (delete all nodes of the way except first 2, then draw the rest of the line from scratch), so it could result in many deletions.
BR
Lokai (2026-02-27 10:58:40+00:00): Hallo gut, dass Sie bei OSM mitmachen.

Die umgangssprachlich genannten Spielstraßen sollten ohne genau Angabe  der Vmax gezeichnet werden.
Die maximal zulässige Geschwindingkeit ist die Schrittgeschwindigkeit, die ist leider nicht auf 5 km/h festgelegt.

Gruß
maro21 (2026-02-25 15:54:38+00:00): A ta aktualizacja na jakiej podstawie? Jakie jest źródło adresu 37? Adres tutaj już jest 37-47: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1200937990
W użytym przez ciebie podkładzie z adresami jest dokładnie tak jak było zmapowane.
DaveF (2026-02-26 05:01:45+00:00): There is already a railway=station tag, please don't duplicate.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-24 02:56:12+00:00): As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality of your mapping and avoid consequences for your account and the features you map. See https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more information.

Specifically:

* You added these details at the wrong location to the wrong building, as the address given is several miles away, near a completely different road.
* addr:street=* was malformed, with inappropriate abbreviations and not matching the corresponding way (which it was nowhere near)
* image=* is a spammy external link to a copyrighted, trademark image of the company logo, which is in any case not a correct use of this tag as it is specified to be an image of the location
* payment:financing=* is not a documented or useful tag.
* "toll free number" is a complete nonsense tag; it does not exist and tag keys never contain spaces. phone:tollfree=* or phone:US=* should be used instead.
* website=* contains privacy-invasive tracking tags that must be removed

While I would normally revert all of your changesets on this and your many associated accounts as SEO spam and require you to fix it yourself, since @mueschel and other mappers did you the (undeserved) courtesy of fixing your tags for you on this and other changesets, and unlike most SEO mappers you appeared to actually make some effort to improve your tagging and make most of your changesets on one account, I'm doing the courtesy of fixing the remaining issues for you on the various POIs you added.

I did so for this POI in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/186270318
jbcharron (2026-02-25 18:54:32+00:00): La modification n'est pas valide, la boutique Apothicus est bien une boutique différente de capital d'or, il y a 3 boutique a cette adresse, ça a été vérifié hier sur le terrain
Hopla57 (2026-02-25 19:11:14+00:00): Ah mince, je vais revert.

Du coup, elles sont dans quel ordre ces 3 boutiques ?
Hopla57 (2026-02-25 19:18:25+00:00): Apothicus à la place de B. Pouillon tout à gauche ?
Capital d'Or au milieu ?
Zigzag au Point tout à droite ?
jbcharron (2026-02-25 19:22:20+00:00): Même peut être 4 boutiques, j'irais revérifier demain
Mais pour moi dans le sens de la rue, c'est B.Pouillon, Apothicus, Capital d'Or, Zigzag
Il y a beaucoup trop de boutiques dans cette rue dont des vacantes ce qui fait que c'est compliqué de tout noter 😅
Hopla57 (2026-02-25 20:00:59+00:00): Hihi 

D'après Bing Stretside, je pense qu'il n'y a que 3 boutiques. D'ailleurs, je viens de voir que l'entreprise B.Pouillon existe depuis 1976, du coup je suppose qu'il a pris sa retraite.

N'hésite pas à faire une photo si tu passes. :-)

À+
jbcharron (2026-02-26 20:50:13+00:00): Après avoir revérifié, il a bien 3 boutiques au 25 de la rue dans l'ordre que du indiquait. Il semble même que les boutiques B.Pouillon et Capital d'Or était initialement une boutique découpé en 2 boutiques distinctes
Bonne soirée
Hopla57 (2026-02-26 20:56:21+00:00): Ok, super, je corrige.
Merci à toi. 👍
jbcharron (2026-02-26 21:50:12+00:00): Et B. Pouillon existe toujours, c'est bien Apothicus qui a été remplacé par Capital d'Or désolé pour les modifs inutiles
Hopla57 (2026-02-26 22:49:08+00:00): Hopla, c'est fait !
eggie (2026-02-25 11:40:01+00:00): Dag Pail,

Maar waarom dan access=no 
Waar is dan dat fietspad?
bicycle=yes en foot=yes is default op wegen.
Welk bord staat hier vooraan.
Hoe zit het met mofa en moped?

MVG
eggie