piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse (2023-05-17 19:20:01+00:00): (just to be clear - here we are talking about anything to shop=yes, not just shop=fixme)

If you've removed it from the wiki page, are you going to undo your changes?
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-05-17 19:20:46+00:00): > Thinking that changing "rare tag I do not understand" into "common but meaningless tag" added any value.

(1) I am definitely not changing all shop=* tags that I do not understand into shop=yes.

In such cases I leave them alone (for example, from start of my list of exactly such values:
shop=grossery, shop=towing, shop=showroom, shop=salon, shop=garage,
shop=pond, shop=consignment...)

(2) It was change of rare meanigless tag into a more common meaningless tag with support into some QA tools allowing easier spotting and fixing it (maybe it still should be not done, but presenting it as changing tags while I know that I do not understand them is weird)
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-05-17 19:22:26+00:00): > If you've removed it from the wiki page, are you going to undo your changes?

I can do this, though I ask you to at least read what I posted and consider it. shop=yes usage going up does not mean that it is not being reviewed or that shop=yes objects are less likely to be reviewed than shop=fixme
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-05-17 19:24:18+00:00): if you have read what I posted in this changeset comment/other changeset comments/talk mailing list and still think that it was bad edit then I can roll back shop=fixme changes  and maybe also other if also problematic.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-05-17 19:26:34+00:00): > (just to be clear - here we are talking about anything to shop=yes, not just shop=fixme)

Are you asking also to undo say shop=*/shop=unknown to shop=yes changes discussed in February 2023?
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-05-17 19:40:04+00:00): Or are you asking to roll it back only in UK?

If you are asking to roll back everything, everywhere - would you be fine with asking wider community whether they think that shop=* is preferable to shop=yes (and if not - is shop=yes preferable enough  to change it)
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-05-17 19:46:51+00:00): Also, do you still think that it was an undocumented bot edit? That claim was a bit irritating as my bot edits are relatively rare case of actually following https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct
SomeoneElse (2023-05-17 20:35:19+00:00): To be clear, what I'm suggesting is that if you _really_ care about having correct values in OSM then a tiny bit of research  will often yield correct values.  https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1v53 is the set of your recent changes over a widish area.  Many of the items that that finds can be easily found: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/441917983/history is clearly https://www.the-stone-shop.com/ for example, and of the in-use tags at https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/shop#overview perhaps https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/shop=gemstones is the best bet.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/658618239/history is pretty obviously https://www.facebook.com/raysdiscountstores/ , and looks like a https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/shop=variety_store to me.
Changing these to shop=yes means that they get lost in https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1v54 , which means that they will just get ignored, like the other 180k examples.
SomeoneElse (2023-05-17 20:44:08+00:00): > Also, do you still think that it was an undocumented bot edit?

Yes, in the sense that you wrote some documentation saying what you were going to do and then did something else instead.  To be honest, I have re-read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edits/Mateusz_Konieczny_-_bot_account/fixing_malformed_shop_tags and I still struggle to understand exactly what you are trying to say. I presume that "Please write at bot approval thread." means "please reply on the mailing list" to prevent part of this change from occurring" I did that and you ignored the request.  By that definition it is surely an undocumented mechanical edit.
SomeoneElse (2023-05-17 20:46:18+00:00): > I am not fan of NSI style blind replacements based on name match and I am not planning to do them
I'm glad to hear that, but unfortunately what you are doing is even worse!  You aren't even thinking about what the correct value for an object is.  What you are doing is akin to setting everything to "highway=road" because you can't be bothered to survey or look at imagery.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-05-17 21:10:26+00:00): > I presume that "Please write at bot approval thread." means "please reply on the mailing list" to prevent part of this change from occurring" I did that and you ignored the request.

Argghhh. Now I understand how it looked from your side and I agree that it was also reasonable to interpret it this way.

>  What you are doing is akin to setting everything to "highway=road" because you can't be bothered to survey or look at imagery.

I would argue that setting highway=unknown_type to highway=road would be helpful and useful because it is detected by many tools, while no actual data is lost

> Changing these to shop=yes means that they get lost in https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1v54 , which means that they will just get ignored, like the other 180k examples.

(1) being findable in one go with other standalone shop=yes is in my opinion actually friendlier to people looking to fix them 

(2) standalone shop=yes are being processed - just a single tool (where checking POI count is easy) resulted in fixes to 6000 shop=yes in 2022, and this one is not really important in this context. Similarly, other tools would never list shop=fixme and other rarely used values (and going through all rarely used shop=* values is not really effective - either when looking at taginfo or by looking at nearby undocumented values)
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-05-17 21:19:58+00:00): > Many of the items that that finds can be easily found: 

rolled back for this objects, opened notes at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3693714 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3693712

Not convinced at all that shop=other or shop=store are more likely to result in fixes or that moving to shop=yes is losing any data or making harder to fix it. If anything it would cause it to appear in various QA tools and still be clearly visible to any mapper inspecting it manually.

Not changed to values you mentioned as I am not sure enough to retag it to that values.
eggie (2023-05-14 16:44:09+00:00): Dag Stefan  Je voetpaden eindigen op de landuse en zullen dus niet routeren. Kijk je nog even?
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=136091084
MVG
eggie
felipeeugenio (2023-05-14 16:26:34+00:00): Hola
Por favor cuando los caminos son evidentemente privados, agregar access=private.
Que a veces se dejan unidos caminos y se da la opción de rutear por lugares que en verdad no tienen conexión.

También por favor cuidar de no dejar los caminos unidos a los limites comunales.
En JOSM puedes filtrar cierto tipo de cosas para ni siquiera verlos y tener la opción de "tocarlos"
saludos
Jordi MF (2023-05-15 19:51:07+00:00): Hola martinrios,
Gracias por tener la intención de mejorar OSM, pero no deberías guardar pruebas en la base de datos para no crear información errónea.

Ya he eliminado tu prueba.

Saludos,
Jordi
Dimitar155 (2023-05-14 19:34:24+00:00): Hi Rotobul,

And welcome to OpenStreetMap! Thank you for adding the wikidata tags. Please note that this tag is intended for specific objects, not for a brand. For brands please use brand:wikidata.

If you have any questions, let me know.

Best wishes,
Dimitar
NorthCrab_upload (2023-05-14 16:50:13+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o miejscowości.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/322191819

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
M_Gaugg (2023-05-14 16:32:08+00:00): Sorry falsche Beschreibung: 

Das wurde gefixt: 

Scharnitz: unzählige Fehler behoben, 2 Ortsschilder und 3 Sackgassen neu eingezeichnet, Gebäude und Bangerpark sowie Fußgängerübergang korrigiert, Waldweg verlängert und zusammengeschlossen, 28 Wege um Straßenbeschaffenheit ergänzt;
avinet_ua (2023-05-15 21:24:25+00:00): чому немає загального тега "name"? 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1876496471
avinet_ua (2023-05-15 21:43:46+00:00): "Военкомат Голосіевського району"
букву є єноти з"їли?
DUGA (2024-04-22 16:44:33+00:00): Please stop using AI to vandalize the map, you will be reported for nosense like this one:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1172766741#map=19/41.84513/-75.59960
descubrebitcoin (2023-11-11 00:04:32+00:00): Can you elaborate more on the reason for removing the currency:XBT tag? Is this ATM malfunctioning or is there another reason?
EneaSuper (2023-05-16 09:08:20+00:00): Ciao IlBano, grazie mille per la correzione, devo aver combinato qualche cavolata io modificando tutta la zona.

Già che ci siamo ti chiedo una cosa: tu sei bravo con il routing dei mezzi pubblici? Perché ci sarebbe da correggere il tragitto di una linea bus AMT extraurbana che transita proprio per Via Sardorella ed io non sono capace di farlo...
IlBano (2023-05-16 16:07:43+00:00): Ciao EneaSuper.
Di nulla.

Ho corretto i membri della relazione bus 277 direzione Cremeno (quella in direzione opposta era ok).

Ciao
EneaSuper (2023-05-25 10:20:52+00:00): Perfetto, grazie mille per quello che hai fatto!

Perdona il ritardo nella risposta, ma ho avuto molto da fare in questo periodo 😅
rskedgell (2023-05-15 09:08:51+00:00): Repeating my comments on changeset #134414016:

1) The name=* key is for the unique name of an object, not just a general description. If there isn't an appropriate tag, you can use description=*, but in this case you could use building=house. I've linked to the documentation on these below.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dhouse

2) You've traced some houses on top of houses which had already mapped.

3) Please don't type gibberish as your changeset comment.

As the previous comment was ignored, reverted without further discussion in
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136116111
arcanma (2023-05-15 13:18:51+00:00): Benvenuto OMLA, vedo che è il tuo primo contributo.
Hai richiesto il controllo delle modifiche, innanzitutto ti chiedo di fare 1 - 2 modifiche e salvare, è più semplice controllare e darti consigli, come prima modifica è positiva perché aggiunge informazioni importanti. Un utente aveva già corretto via S. Girolamo, eliminandone la maggior parte, perché si sovrapponeva ad una via già esistente, io ho ripristinato la via eliminando la sovrapposizione e migliorato altre piccole imprecisioni, se controlli come sono ora gli elementi da te inseriti ti può aiutare a migliorare. I consigli principali sono: 
- nei nomi non si mettono abbreviazioni e si inserisce anche il qualificatore (Via San Girolamo e Fosso Cavarello, per il collegamento a piedi tra Via San Girolamo e Strada San Girolamo non so come è definito, se non ha un nome proprio va tolto il nome), 
- il supporto ponte è un'informazione in più per indicare la posizione dei piloni di supporto, il materiale, ecc. e si inserisce di solito quando si disegna l'area occupata dal ponte con etichetta man_made=bridge, ma è essenziale aggiungere nel tratto di strada che percorre il ponte le etichette bridge=yes e layer=1 
- quando si inseriscono le strade fare attenzione a non sovrapporle ad altri elementi, l'ultimo (o il primo) nodo va collegato solo ad altri elementi highway.
- prima di salvare se vengono segnalati errori cerca di correggerli 
Infine ti consiglio di guardare https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Glossario_OSM per informazioni su come mappare gli elementi
foreigner037 (2023-05-14 17:45:01+00:00): Hi,

may I ask what the purpose of these tags exactly is? They seem to duplicate information already present and not add anything particularly relevant on its own. What is the advantage of using this combination over the normal turn:lanes tag?
krb100 (2023-05-19 15:27:20+00:00): Hi,

thank you for looking over my changes. 

The difference between `turn:lanes` and `placement` lies in their use-case: While `turn:lanes` is mainly useful for routing, `placement` has additional properties for advanced rendering engines, such as: https://a-b-street.github.io/osm2streets/#18.49394506349628/42.19918/24.64866

The `placement` tag allows you to draw the highway in a straight line instead of drawing light curves, to touch the middle of the road as often as possible. This is especially useful for entry and exit lanes, that disappear after a short amount of distance. Therefore the mapping is more accurate than just using the `turn:lanes` tag.

See the wiki for more details: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Placement

P.S.

a 2D view showcases the use of placement even more: 

with placement: http://osm.mueschelsoft.de/lanes/?wayid=1158813897&start=1&country=de&placement&adjacent&lanewidth&usenodes&extendway

without placement: http://osm.mueschelsoft.de/lanes/?wayid=1158823100&start=1&country=de&placement&adjacent&lanewidth&usenodes&extendway

I am aware, that it is possible to infer some rendering info from turn:lanes,  by using heuristics, but this can never be accurate, because the ways before and after the exit should also have `turn:lanes` info or some default can be assumed. This will break on complex junctions. Alternatively the `connectivity` could be used. This seems overcomplex for this usecase to me.

Have a great evening!
martinst (2023-05-15 16:21:25+00:00): Wieso hast du den mtb:scale Wert von Way 715552399, 715552398 und 33037015 gelöscht?
maiwolf (2023-05-16 08:03:08+00:00): Das sind Almwege, die teils nur über Gras verlaufen und schon von Erosion betroffen sind. Sie sind nicht für MTBs gedacht!
martinst (2023-05-20 07:48:35+00:00): OSM ist kein Mittel zur Besucherlenkung! Es werden lediglich die in der Realität vorhandenen Maßnahmen erfasst.
mtb:scale-Einträge wiederhergestellt in Changeset 136325701.
BCNorwich (2023-05-15 06:46:42+00:00): Hi, Duplicated highway line removed.
wille (2023-05-16 19:44:28+00:00): Oi, Raphael. Você mapeou vias de serviço, mas pela imagem me parece caminhos de pedestre. Fiz a correção.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136095179
Raphaelkaart (2023-05-17 17:30:27+00:00): Olá Wille!
valeu pela correção,

Atenciosamente,
Raphaelkaart
pyram (2023-05-15 15:47:41+00:00): Hi müllers,

mir ist zwar nicht klar, wie Du die ganzen Daten im Internet zusammenfindest...
Jedenfalls sind hier eine Menge falsche Postleitzahlen zusammengekommen: https://wambachers-osm.website/Postcodes.html?map=13/51.386299/12.650242&base=OSM&data=PCBDE,WPCDE
und am POI https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10896486161/history#map=18/51.39002/12.65571gibt es keinen shop - noch dazu keinen, der "Wolle" heißt. Das ist nur ein "Firmensitz". Der Verkauf läuft über lokale Märkte.

Danke für genaueres hinsehen.
pyram
müllers (2023-05-15 18:38:06+00:00): Hallo pyram,

danke für den berechtigten Hinweis. Ich habe mich durch https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machern auf einen falschen Pfad führen lassen. Ebenfalls danke für das Rücksetzen (unnötiger Zeitaufwand durch Fehler meinerseits). 

Eine schöne Woche
müllers
wielandb (2023-05-15 23:58:09+00:00): Hey :) 

Was genau meinst du mit "Totenstein bitte als Privatweg kennzeichnen?"
map per (2023-05-15 13:13:41+00:00): Wegen review_requested:
Sieht gut aus
The_Nickname (2023-05-15 13:55:22+00:00): Danke sehr, der edit war inspiriert vom neuen 3D Renderer Streets-gl, da sieht's leider gerade etwas broken aus(https://streets.gl/#48.16056,11.53787,45.00,0.00,1500.00). Aber ich map ja nicht für den Renderer ;) und wenn du meinst es passt dann lass ich es bis auf weiteres erstmal so, bevor ich mehr ins kompliziertere 3D-Mapping gehe!
map per (2023-05-15 16:40:34+00:00): Das liegt vermutlich daran, dass building:part=yes am Kirchengebäde gefehlt hat. Hab das vorhin "heimlich" hinzugefügt, hätte ich besser sagen sollen...
map per (2023-05-15 16:54:45+00:00): Das funktioniert auch bei anderen Gebäuden mit building=* und building:part=yes nicht. Sieht nach einem Street GL Bug aus
map per (2023-05-15 16:59:23+00:00): https://github.com/StrandedKitty/streets-gl/issues/3
The_Nickname (2023-05-17 17:07:33+00:00): Ok, vielen Dank! Auch wenn die Frauenkirche richtig gerendert wird. Jetzt habe ich zumindest ein Projekt für den Sommer ;)
user_5359 (2023-05-15 15:37:53+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/2347875670. What is the mean of the tag "munro top" = "yes"?
Fraser Young (2023-05-16 19:37:37+00:00): Hi, I'm not sure if this is the correct way to communicate with you but here goes anyway!

You asked a question about my change:
Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/2347875670. What is the mean of the tag "munro top" = "yes"?

The answer is that in Scotland there are mountains higher than 3000 feet (914.4 metres) and they are called Munros after the man who first listed them. Some mountains have attached peaks that are not sufficiently distinct to be separate mountains but are distinct enough to be called "Tops" or "Munro Tops". 

I wanted to add a tag to this peak to indicate that it was a "munro top" in a similar way to how munros are i.e. munro = yes

I hope this answers your question.

I asked that this changelist be reviewed by someone else because I wasn't sure if there was another way of indicating a munro top. I looked but couldn't find one.

If you have any more information for me I would be grateful.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-05-14 18:30:15+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1172782145

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Las Wolski (2023-05-14 19:01:04+00:00): Zgodnie z sugestią zamieniłem addr:city na addr:place
NorthCrab (2023-05-14 22:52:58+00:00): Jest poprawnie :)! Dzięki
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2023-05-14 18:31:17+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136088285 中已有其他用户做了初步回退
eggie (2023-05-14 19:28:00+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
adrianojbr (2023-05-18 00:15:39+00:00): Olá, IgorR31!

Muito bom o seu trabalho e sua iniciativa.

Para ficar melhor, evite grudar áreas nas linhas que representam as ruas, já que de falto elas não são grudadas, pois as linhas estão representando o eixo da rua.

Abraço!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136097102
wkdgs (2023-05-17 08:15:40+00:00): Ich kann dir leider nicht wirklich helfen, aber deine Changeset-Kommentare fand ich sehr treffend :D.

Falls es immer noch nicht klappt, schau mal hier:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/

Da gibt es bestimmt jemanden, der weiterhelfen kann.
skyper (2023-05-17 12:09:10+00:00): Hi,
`roof:direction` ist der richtige Ansatz. Jetzt kommt es auf die verarbeitende Software an, dass auch zu verwenden.
Was ich mich allerdings frage, sind das alles einzelne Gebäude oder nur Teile (`building:part`)?
`area=yes` kann auf jeden Fall weg und auch die Adresse würde ich nicht an jedem Gebäude sondern nur an der Fläche für die Schule (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/18360195) eintragen, wobei da jetzt auch unterschiedliche Hausnummern erfasst sind. Welche ist korrekt?
Viele Grüße,
skyper
Dimitar155 (2023-05-15 06:12:42+00:00): Hello krb100,

Please do not combine residential zones with place nodes. If you want to denote the borders of the place, create a relation with type=boundary + boundary=place. Let me know if you have any questions.

Best wishes,
Dimitar
krb100 (2023-05-16 19:46:39+00:00): Hey,

thank you for fixing my mistake.

Много Поздрави!
eggie (2023-05-14 19:31:15+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback... Lijkt me oke die verbinding. Aan de preciese 'loop' van de paden zal wel e.e.a. verbeterd kunnen worden. De uitdaging!

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
NieWnen (2023-05-14 22:13:53+00:00): Brama została dodana na linii granicy administracyjnej miejscowości, a nie na drodze.
Mario90Ksw (2023-05-15 16:47:05+00:00): Dzięki za informacje. Mam pytanie jak mogę sprawdzić które to dokładnie miejsce?
NieWnen (2023-05-15 16:49:37+00:00): Zestaw zmian jest mały, więc jest to łatwe. W zestawie zmian masz obiekty, które zostały dodane/zmodyfikowane/usunięte (pod tymi komentarzami). 

Ten węzeł został umieszczony na linii granicy 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10896647730
Mario90Ksw (2023-05-16 12:17:48+00:00): Ok, juz widze, poprawiłem to miejsce, dzięki za wsparcie.
eggie (2023-05-14 19:34:18+00:00): Dag GPSstarmen,

De paden lopen erg willekeurig kaarsrecht.
Ik gebruik als achytergrond de BGT omtrekgericht. Een transparant van de Landmeetkundige diensten. Die laten nog wel verschillen zien... maar soms kloppen die ook niet.
Genoeg te doen hier.
MVG
eggie
mweper (2023-05-14 20:01:46+00:00): Wow, gran trabajo!! Felicitaciones y gracias por colaborar!!
Stévan Corre (2023-05-14 19:16:50+00:00): Set maxweight=4
Leo Slager (2023-05-16 21:51:01+00:00): Dag Martin,
Vrijwel alle gebouwen in de changeset bevatten wel een fout:
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=5.71258&lat=50.75657&zoom=17&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=long_ways%2Cways_with_long_segments%2Clong_segments%2Cself_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way%2Clong_ways%2Cways_with_long_segments%2Clong_segments%2Cself_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way
Meestal zijn die zelf kruisende wegen er de oorzaak van dat het gebouw niet gerenderd kan worden.
Martin Borsje (2023-05-17 03:27:51+00:00): Vreemd. Ik zal er eens naar kijken.  Volgens mij mekkerde josm niet.
Martin Borsje (2023-05-17 04:48:47+00:00): Ik heb er even vluchtig naar gekeken en begrijp er niets van. Tijdens het editen zag ik al dat veel gebouwen met dubbele segmenten getekend waren; ik heb me met name op de kerk gericht die was geheel verkeerd.
De andere gebouwen daar ben ik niet aangezeten, waarom mijn naam daar gekoppeld geworden is, is me een raadsel. De changeset reverten lukt me niet meer, te veel conflicten. Ik zal er vanavond eens op mijn gemak naar kijken.
Leo Slager (2023-05-17 08:50:22+00:00): Het blijkt toch om de voorgaande changeset te gaan:
136098241
Leo Slager (2023-05-17 08:56:59+00:00): Hoe dit zou kunnen gebeuren is mij ook een volledig raadsel. Het lijkt wel of je bij al die gebouwen een node hebt samengevoegd met een dicht bij staande andere node.  Reverten met 60 conflicten is ook niet te doen. Ik kan ze de komende dagen wel meenemen in mijn dagelijkse rondje fout zoeken/oplossen.
Martin Borsje (2023-05-17 20:04:28+00:00): Ik heb inmiddels e.e.a. gecorrigeerd. Wellicht nog niet 100 %.
UT93 (2024-08-26 15:31:12+00:00): Man könnte sie jetzt erneut anpassen. Sie befindet sich drum mittlerweile nicht mehr im Bau, sondern ist bereits seit Längerem fertig erstellt und betriebsbereit.
mueschel (2023-05-15 11:44:34+00:00): Hi,
please watch out for the correct spelling of keys. You use 'areas=yes' here - but the correct key is 'area' and it's not necessary on landcover areas.
Guillermo Torres (2023-05-17 20:59:55+00:00): Thank you. I didn't realize the error. I will correct the label
map per (2023-05-15 13:07:13+00:00): Hallo maxwxyz,

die Wohngebietsflächen (1) und (2) überlappen sich.
Bitte (1) wieder löschen.

Danke und viele Grüße
map per

(1) https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1172810463/history
(2) https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1270777
maxwxyz (2023-05-15 19:50:21+00:00): erl.
map per (2023-05-16 06:21:13+00:00): Danke!
limes11 (2023-05-15 19:03:36+00:00): Hi, 

hat sich nach Öffnung hier etwas an der Beschilderung geändert? Verbot für Fahrzeuge mit Ausnahme von Rad und Einsatzkräften?

VG Limes