piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Jordi MF (2024-11-04 22:33:24+00:00): Se han revertido todos los changesets de este usuario porque es un usuario bloqueado decenas de veces con cuentas múltiples (https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/usuarios-editando-en-espana-bajo-sospecha-vandalismo-malas-practicas-y-otros/2510/), por lo que sistemáticamente incumple los Términos de Uso de OSM (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenStreetMap_account#Account_Names_and_Multi_Account_Policies y https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Terms_of_Use#VI._Account_cancellation_or_suspension).
El usuario realiza múltiples y pequeñas ediciones para dificultar que sus cambios puedan ser revisados. Los mayores errores son que modifica la toponimia oficial para que no aparezca en valenciano aunque así lo dictamine la Acadèmia Valenciana de la Llengua en la cartografía oficial de la Comunitat Valenciana. Tenemos permiso explícito de esta entidad que, según las leyes autonómicas, es la entidad encargada de la toponimia oficial. Tampoco no tiene en cuenta la cartelería local que aparece en calles, carreteras y sendas.
Por otra parte, este usuario (y todas sus cuentas) está mapeando según las ortofotos y sin tener en cuenta el conocimiento local para delimitar si los elementos se tratan de edificios en ruinas, muros u otros elementos e, incluso, elimina PDIs con todo el historial de forma injustificada.
Ante todo lo expuesto y por las diversas anomalías, revierto todos los changesets porque, de revisar cada uno de ellos, únicamente nos dedicaríamos a ello, como si fuésemos administradores. En caso de revisar todas las ediciones de este usuario que ya ha sido bloqueado por 10 años con otras cuentas, nunca podríamos seguir mejorando la base de datos debido a revisar durante horas cada uno de los conjuntos de cambios y, por lo tanto, dejaríamos de lado seguir mapeando para añadir nueva información.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158759148
beelseal (2024-11-04 22:43:09+00:00): I realized I left off Sunday lunch hours.
Nathan_A_RF (2024-12-05 21:34:14+00:00): What source did you use for the names here? Wikipedia lists the village as "Cross Hands"
mcliquid (2024-11-05 09:14:16+00:00): Hi and thank you for your contribution!

Please note for the future: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
cehceh (2024-11-05 16:51:26+00:00): Hi mcliquid,
thanks for the hint! Normally I keep my change sets local - in this case I stupidly summarized corrections of osmose errors.
I will keep this in mind in the future!
Best regards!
Jordi MF (2024-11-04 22:45:35+00:00): Se han revertido todos los changesets de este usuario porque es un usuario bloqueado decenas de veces con cuentas múltiples (https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/usuarios-editando-en-espana-bajo-sospecha-vandalismo-malas-practicas-y-otros/2510/), por lo que sistemáticamente incumple los Términos de Uso de OSM (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenStreetMap_account#Account_Names_and_Multi_Account_Policies y https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Terms_of_Use#VI._Account_cancellation_or_suspension).
El usuario realiza múltiples y pequeñas ediciones para dificultar que sus cambios puedan ser revisados. Los mayores errores son que modifica la toponimia oficial para que no aparezca en valenciano aunque así lo dictamine la Acadèmia Valenciana de la Llengua en la cartografía oficial de la Comunitat Valenciana. Tenemos permiso explícito de esta entidad que, según las leyes autonómicas, es la entidad encargada de la toponimia oficial. Tampoco no tiene en cuenta la cartelería local que aparece en calles, carreteras y sendas.
Por otra parte, este usuario (y todas sus cuentas) está mapeando según las ortofotos y sin tener en cuenta el conocimiento local para delimitar si los elementos se tratan de edificios en ruinas, muros u otros elementos e, incluso, elimina PDIs con todo el historial de forma injustificada.
Ante todo lo expuesto y por las diversas anomalías, revierto todos los changesets porque, de revisar cada uno de ellos, únicamente nos dedicaríamos a ello, como si fuésemos administradores. En caso de revisar todas las ediciones de este usuario que ya ha sido bloqueado por 10 años con otras cuentas, nunca podríamos seguir mejorando la base de datos debido a revisar durante horas cada uno de los conjuntos de cambios y, por lo tanto, dejaríamos de lado seguir mapeando para añadir nueva información.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158759400
RobertTBS (2024-11-07 20:15:36+00:00): Is there a reason you changed two of the John Deere service roads to racetrack?
Jer105 (2024-11-08 01:52:24+00:00): It’s a test track for new equipment where they run new sprayers back and forth testing new models.  There is probably a better term but it’s not really a service road.
voschix (2025-07-16 09:21:16+00:00): Hi,
you changed some foot-only crossings along the Civlocia Treviso Ostiglia from bicycle=dismount to bicycle=designated. This is not correct. Theyse are really foot-only crossings. Have a look at the corresponding Mapillary imagery, to check. 
(I  am a cyclist and I am not happy of thes foot-only crossings there, but that is what they are on the ground)
Bauer33333 (2024-11-17 17:37:14+00:00): Hi, seit wann ist denn die Straße Herrenwiesen für den Kfz-Verkehr gesperrt? Das ist doch eine ganz normale Landstraße
welzheimerwald (2024-11-23 18:30:16+00:00): Danke fürs Ausbessern. Die Straße Heusee in Plü war ungewöhnlicherweise mit access=agricultural getaggt
Jordi MF (2024-11-04 23:36:48+00:00): Se han revertido todos los changesets de este usuario porque es un usuario bloqueado decenas de veces con cuentas múltiples (https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/usuarios-editando-en-espana-bajo-sospecha-vandalismo-malas-practicas-y-otros/2510/), por lo que sistemáticamente incumple los Términos de Uso de OSM (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenStreetMap_account#Account_Names_and_Multi_Account_Policies y https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Terms_of_Use#VI._Account_cancellation_or_suspension).
El usuario realiza múltiples y pequeñas ediciones para dificultar que sus cambios puedan ser revisados. Los mayores errores son que modifica la toponimia oficial para que no aparezca en valenciano aunque así lo dictamine la Acadèmia Valenciana de la Llengua en la cartografía oficial de la Comunitat Valenciana. Tenemos permiso explícito de esta entidad que, según las leyes autonómicas, es la entidad encargada de la toponimia oficial. Tampoco no tiene en cuenta la cartelería local que aparece en calles, carreteras y sendas.
Por otra parte, este usuario (y todas sus cuentas) está mapeando según las ortofotos y sin tener en cuenta el conocimiento local para delimitar si los elementos se tratan de edificios en ruinas, muros u otros elementos e, incluso, elimina PDIs con todo el historial de forma injustificada.
Ante todo lo expuesto y por las diversas anomalías, revierto todos los changesets porque, de revisar cada uno de ellos, únicamente nos dedicaríamos a ello, como si fuésemos administradores. En caso de revisar todas las ediciones de este usuario que ya ha sido bloqueado por 10 años con otras cuentas, nunca podríamos seguir mejorando la base de datos debido a revisar durante horas cada uno de los conjuntos de cambios y, por lo tanto, dejaríamos de lado seguir mapeando para añadir nueva información.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158760257
huntertur (2024-11-05 17:08:27+00:00): I have undone your vandalism and all associated changesets.
SpaceTracer (2024-11-06 21:09:28+00:00): Correction: Source used was Esri World Imagery (-1.00; 3.50); Strava; Mapillary
bxl-forever (2024-11-04 23:56:19+00:00): Hello Comino,

I spotted your latest changes and I wish to kindly warn you there might be some misunderstanding about OSM works.

You probably believe you are helping others by repeating addresses on some places, but this is not helpful.  On the contrary, it might be destructive, especially when data creates a mismatch.

OSM is a geographical database and addresses are automatically computed by inheritance or proximity.  In many cases, we even added relations to explicitely link a place to its address and/or entrance door.  Here is an example for Dolle Mol.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16276596
As for post codes and city names, we do not fill them in Belgium, because they are automatically obtained, respectively from postal_code boundary relations and from administtrative boundary relations.

Don’t spend more time duplicating available information.  In case you want to continue using the simple online editor (iD), you may safely ignore the text boxes they show for addresses.

I will repair the data here.  Have a nice day.
Comino (2024-11-05 01:50:41+00:00): Hi bxl-forever,

That’s new to me. I've primarily been involved in The Netherlands and have only recently started working with nodes in Belgium. Out of the 300+ nodes I checked in The Netherlands, ALL have an address. In Belgium, about 90% of the nodes I checked so far do have a streetname, housenumber, postcode and city name. These addresses are used in applications like www.btcmaps.org. A node that lacks an address is deemed incomplete.

Greetings,

Edwin Comino
bxl-forever (2024-11-05 02:04:26+00:00): Yes, Netherlands has a different convention about this, we know.
Comino (2024-11-05 02:14:18+00:00): So what is the story with all the nodes in Belgium which do have an address?
huntertur (2024-11-05 17:08:19+00:00): I have undone your vandalism and all associated changesets.
huntertur (2024-11-05 17:08:10+00:00): I have undone your vandalism and all associated changesets.
Glassman (2024-11-05 17:35:34+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158759870
APneunzehn74 (2025-01-05 10:28:09+00:00): Hello, please do not give descriptive names to vineyards. The vineyards are already correctly recorded as vineyards. Thank you https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names
ssundell (2024-11-20 22:13:25+00:00): Melko tiukka tagitus tuo access=no tielle, jonka perällä kuitenkin on vielä talo... 8)
dododont (2024-11-21 07:14:57+00:00): Joo discouraged voisi olla parempi, jos sekin estää automaattireitityksen ja jättää jäljen karttaan.

Olkoon nyt merkintä toistaiseksi. Katsotaan saako paikallisasukas jotain muutosta asiaan. Meitä molempia on ilmeisesti sama koira purrut.

Reittiä voi kyllä muuten kulkea läpi, ei mene pihoihin.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-11-05 00:01:13+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, zamień addr:place na addr:city. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/385473318

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
ilias_ (2024-11-05 14:46:18+00:00): Great job assyzeus!
LordGarySugar (2024-11-05 00:57:19+00:00): Hi, could you explain why you have deleted sections of highway and changed oneway status for a large distance?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158760874
cyclehunter (2024-11-05 00:51:58+00:00): I forgot to close the previous changeset so here are 2 changesets mixed.
Refined tagging for the Hartlepool Marina lock. Lock gates have path on top. Moved coastline and GB border to outer lock gate.
Glassman (2024-11-05 17:36:29+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158761019
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-11-05 23:40:19+00:00): All changesets from the past day reverted due to various incorrect tag changes and road deletions. No response to comments.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158761178
huntertur (2024-11-05 17:07:42+00:00): I have undone your vandalism and all associated changesets.
jmapb (2024-11-15 03:53:36+00:00): Hi alpine_alpaca & welcome to OSM in NYC, great to see a new mapper on the scene!

I was updating the Stuyvesant Gourmet Deli (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3676993335) when I noticed the fixme tag that you added in this changeset, asking if shop=convenience is the correct tag for a bodega... and generally, yeah, I'd say it is. You might find some tagged in other ways -- maybe shop=deli or shop=greengrocer -- and those might be ok in specific circumstances. But shop=convenience is usually the best tag for a small shop that sells food & isn't any kind of specialty shop.
jmapb (2024-11-15 04:00:12+00:00): We use the cuisine tag to indicate that food is served, & what kind. This is often used for restaurants but can also be applied to shops that prepare food. I used cuisine=breakfast;sandwich (multiple values separated by a semicolon) for this shop.

I also removed the fixme tag -- in general this isn't the best way to communicate with your fellow mappers. You can ask questions at community forums (https://community.openstreetmap.org) and there's also an active community on Slack that includes a NYC-specific channel #local-nyc (https://osmus.slack.com/archives/C4DPLAN3U).

OSM also has some built-in discussion methods: direct messages to other mappers, changeset comments (like this), and map notes which allow public discussion about issues at a particular location.
alpine_alpaca (2024-11-15 06:01:56+00:00): Hi jmapb, thanks for explaining all this! Super helpful advice for helping me learn best practices and good places to ask questions and have discussions.

I'll take all this into account when I'm mapping going forward -- and thanks for fixing up this node a bit!
adiatmad (2024-11-20 04:58:12+00:00): Just wanted to confirm, is this really a cave entrance in the world? Please double-check.
(https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1330781265)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158761714
adiatmad (2024-11-20 04:58:17+00:00): Just wanted to confirm, is this really a cave entrance in the world? Please double-check.
(https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1330781265)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158761714
CENTSOARER (2025-06-29 00:20:37+00:00): Estimado Daniel:
Normalmente suelo abocarme a resolver más que a pedir cambios por parte de otros contribuidores del mapa, pero este conjunto de cambios y otros similares, están siendo más bien problemáticos. Enseguida listo los defectos que he encontrado sistemáticamente (yo también he importado del DENUE de INEGI):
1) Los nombres de los PDI están todos con mayúsculas, lo cual va contra las convenciones de OSM y la convención nacional para México.
2) Parece que todos los números fueron convertidos a decimales y no a enteros, por lo que los domicilios y teléfonos llevan siempre un ".0" al final.
3) INEGI Reporta como nombre el objeto genérico y adiciona "SIN NOMBRE", mientras que en OSM usamos la etiqueta noname=yes para esto.
4) Similar a lo anterior, los docimicilios sin número no se etiquetan como addr:housenumber="S/N" sino como nohousenumber=yes.
5) Los correos electrónicos y sitios web son generalmente en minúsculas.
6) El formato telefónico es un estándar internacional que comienza con el código del país. En el caso de México es +52, luego un espacio y el código LADA (tres dígitos), luego otro espacio y el resto de los números.  Por ejemplo, +52 123 456 7890. A veces los espacios pueden ser obviados.

En mi experiencia, toma varios meses, sobre todo en una ciudad muy grande como Guadalajara, corregir uno a uno todos estos errores. Ojalá pueda ayudarnos a corregir estos problemas de una u otra forma, pues han persistido por meses.
Glassman (2024-11-05 16:58:23+00:00): Because the building can hold more than one business, the business should be added as a node. Can you fix it?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158762373
Syl (2024-11-05 09:15:30+00:00): Bonjour, je viens de regarder rapidement et plusieurs noms ne correspondent toujours pas à la rue à proximité (par exemple Rue Charles De Gaulle, Route de l Etrat, R Claudius Cottier). C'est une édition automatique sans vérifier à chaque fois ?
Olyon (2024-11-05 13:35:44+00:00): Bonjour,
Lorsqu'il manquait une majuscule je n'ai pas vérifié mais pour le reste si.
Je viens de corriger Rue Charles De Gaulle, Route de l Etrat, R Claudius Cottier.
Je revérifierait d'ici quelques jours sur osmose si d'autres erreurs reviennent.
Syl (2024-11-05 14:41:25+00:00): Ok, merci pour ces corrections !
CapitaineMoustache (2024-11-12 12:49:47+00:00): Bonjour Olyon !
Je suis étonné que l'analyse Osmose ne prenne pas en compte les place=square. Parce que la Place Ennemond Thoral était déjà mappée ainsi : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/901401068#map=19/46.144804/4.109131

En plus, on est dans le cas délicat d'une place multifonctionnelle et l'emprise du parking ne correspond pas à celle de la place.
Sinon, on pourrait mettre le name sur le chemin de service qui dessert le parking plutôt ?

Bonne continuation !
CapitaineMoustache (2024-11-12 15:24:39+00:00): De même, je repense à un nouveau cas qui vient de se présenter à moi à Charlieu : des adresses reliées... à un parc !
Osmose va voir rouge ! :D
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/392868206
Olyon (2024-11-13 16:56:05+00:00): Osmose doit regarder que les highway=* et je ne pense pas que c'est le seul outil à le faire donc je préfère, quand c'est possible, ajouter le nom sur un highway=* mais il y a des cas plus compliqué que d'autres.
Glassman (2024-11-05 16:59:31+00:00): Same issue - business should be added as a node. Also street names are spelled out in OSM. The reason is that software has a hard time unabbreviating.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158762416
Mashin (2024-11-05 14:55:47+00:00): Welcome to OSM and thanks for editing!

Just a few suggestions:
1. When the parking lot is more or less rectangular you can press Q key to automatically force all its angles to 90˚. Those shapes then look much nicer.

2. You can try to add more nodes/point to the parking lot outline to make it shape more accurate. And try to avoid overlapping its area with other objects such as buildings. As an example you can look at this parking lot: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/341662678

Cheers
Casey_Hartford (2024-11-05 15:15:25+00:00): Thanks for the tips! Will try those out

Quick questions, 
1) is there a way to "add more nodes" once a shape is already formed? Or would I need to start over with a new shape to do so 
2) How can I easily "carve out" a building or other feature in the middle of a parking lot that isn't parking. It would be great to be able to do the outline of a lot then cut out the building center of it 

Appreciate it
Mashin (2024-11-05 16:40:05+00:00): 1) For existing areas you can select the object and then drag on the small arrows that are between each two nodes. 
Or just create a new node by double clicking somewhere on the outline and then drag than new node to a new place.
(To go back to adding new nodes by clicking, you have to go through a relatively complicated workaround. But in case you want to give it a try *)

2) To create a hole in the parking lot area, select both the parking lot and the building inside (shift + click) and then press C to combine. 
(This will convert it into something called "relation" where the original outline will be an "outer" and the building and "inner" boundary.
You can verify that it worked by selecting the original outline, scroll all the way down in the left panel and then clink on the Parking Lot name under Relations.)


*) Workaround:
1. Select two nodes of the parking lot between which you want to inset points.
2. Press X to cut.
3. Select the small cut segment.
4. Scroll down in the side menu to find relations. And click on the trashcan icon to remove it from relation.
5.Press DEL key to delete the small segment.
6. Select one of the two nodes where you cut and press A. Now you can add nodes by single click.
7. Finish adding new nodes by clicking on the second node.
8. Select both split segments of the parking lot (shift + click) and press C to combine it to single area.
Glassman (2024-11-05 17:05:42+00:00): This property is designated as residential according to the county. The website does not show any customer locations. Can you confirm this is a location that is open to customers otherwise it should be removed.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158762571
Glassman (2024-11-05 17:14:12+00:00): This building actual address is 19214 Bothell Way Northeast. Confimed with county data and bing street side imagery. I'm going to revert this edit.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158762614
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-08 04:05:13+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164659356
Glassman (2024-11-05 17:16:58+00:00): The street name is not ices.com/
addr:street	17th Avenue Northwest	17th Avenue Northwest Suite 1842. I'm going to revert this edit as well.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158762694
Lumikeiju (2024-11-05 03:49:05+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

It's great to see businesses adding their locations!

Unfortunately, there's a couple of minor formatting errors in your edits I wanted to make you aware of!

Street names in addresses should be fully expanded - for example, "addr:street=146th PL SE" should be "addr:street=146th Place Southeast".

Additionally, Suite/Unit numbers go in a separate key; for example, in your Changeset: 158762694, "addr:street=17th Avenue Northwest Suite 1842" should be "addr:street=17th Avenue Northwest" + "addr:unit=1842".

And you may consider adding tags describing the business in order to make it easier to find; for example, "craft=cleaning".

TagFinder (https://tagfinder.osm.ch/) and the OSM Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page) are good resources, and feel free to reply here or send me a message if you have any further questions!

Again, thanks for taking the initiative to add your businesses to OpenStreetMap - your contributions are appreciated! Happy mapping!
nevw (2024-11-05 04:10:36+00:00): Hi, you appear to have added the business details to the entire building but PSQ Group as located by their website only occupy a portion of the building…. Level 2, 200 Adelaide Terrace, Perth.
You should leave the outline of the building with only tags applicable to the building. 
The business details should be added to a separate node within the building outline and all it’s tags added to that node.
nevw (2024-11-05 09:39:08+00:00): Hi, I reverted your changeset because it is probably easiest for you to add a new node within the building boundary and add all the business tags to that.
Kovoschiz (2024-11-05 17:31:53+00:00): Please don't Lie To Renderer. There's no "military" here. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
This was voted https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary=border_zone
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-18 04:43:18+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165095451