piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2026-02-01 06:58:05+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13395126503 v4

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Dental practice"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-02-08 09:31:18+00:00): ❌ Text fixed by https://osm.org/changeset/177936206
Herman Lee (2026-02-02 06:31:54+00:00): 本修改集已退回，详见：https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177992072
HighRouleur (2026-02-22 02:19:54+00:00): There are no signs in the general area that indicate that these ways are for cycling purposes.
Victorian legislation states that  bikes are not permitted on sidewalks/foothways unless specifically signed for use by bikes.
Tomaussie_17 (2026-02-22 13:25:40+00:00): Hi HighRouleur. You are right. 

When I was making the paths for a lot of my surveying I just based it off the path width being much wider (e.g wider than the footpath on the other side of the road) and the colour (Bike paths in the old Springvale Council/Kingston City Council all seem to have a red concrete colour) while regular footpaths don't. Plus the unique separated bike lane/foot path situation they've got going on in Patterson Lakes.

Common sense would imply that these are shared paths but unfortunately the law is not common sense! 

It would be a shame to lose mapping of obvious cycling infrastructure due to bureaucracy - Do you reckon if I got written confirmation from council it'd be alright? probably not if theres still no signage i guess...
Perhaps I'll need to advocate for them to get out and signpost them but fat chance of that haha.

When I was out surveying I did see that some of the paths actually did have signage/markings indicating them as shared paths so I wouldn't discount all of them. I can go out sometime this week to confirm which ones are signed. 

Let me know what you think.
Thomas.
Tomaussie_17 (2026-02-22 13:34:51+00:00): I mapped out the shared paths in Chelsea Heights and Aspendale Gardens under the same pretenses so I'll probably have to check those out too unfortunately.
HighRouleur (2026-02-28 02:53:02+00:00): Hi Tomaussie,

I definitely understand where you are coming from. 
There seems to be some anomalies in the road/path design vs signage of the same. 
In the Kingston and Greater Dandenong areas there are a number of areas where a wider and sometimes different colour path has been installed. This causes inconsistent and incorrect mapping in my opinion. 

It’s an unfortunate situation that certain infrastructure may have been installed however has not been appropriately signed. 
In Victoria, the road rules are very clear that bikes are not permitted on a path/shared path unless it is specifically signed. Surveying for the open street map perspective we should follow the rule of law and map accordingly.
CAM-Gerlach (2026-03-17 22:31:49+00:00): Fixed remaining SEO spam and mistagging in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180030861
CAM-Gerlach (2026-03-17 22:33:47+00:00): Maybe it should be deleted entirely, though, given the stated source of Google Maps in violation of OSM policy...
Aleksandar Matejevic (2026-02-02 07:23:29+00:00): Hi AlexLabrada, 
why have you removed administrative boundary tags from the Isla de la Juventud
AlexLabrada (2026-02-09 12:20:54+00:00): First, Isla de la Juventud is a special municipality with a rank of province, i.e. admin level should be = 4, the actual boundaries are maritime since this demarcation includes neighbour isles, and it already depicted in the map
mueschel (2026-02-06 11:02:10+00:00): Hi,
many of the 'special_needs', 'therapy' and education tags you added here are not used in any other places. Could you check for existing tags?

E.g. there are already some
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/special_needs#similar
or the 'therapy' tags already exist with a `health_specialty` prefix.
Fraxi (2026-01-31 13:39:12+00:00): wow too fast
Dimitar155 (2026-01-31 18:58:06+00:00): 🏎️
eggie (2026-05-25 21:27:03+00:00): Welcome to OSM,
This is an impossible_oneway:highway 	1
Look at the splits in the middle. Hown may I enter this street?

Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2026-05-25 21:28:50+00:00): I changed the direction to solve the problem.
Greetz,
eggie
NeisBot (2026-02-01 06:56:39+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 13 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/56038621 v3 | 5 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1363532547 v1 | 4 crossings
https://osm.org/way/688039311 v1 | 4 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/415814485 v4
https://osm.org/node/6450714527 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177925904
NeisReview (2026-02-08 09:28:19+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/177959121
Kees 59 (2026-07-30 10:13:42+00:00): Haargalerij Venhuizen heeft voor opening_hours "Zie website".
Er wordt echter geen `website` gegeven. Daarnaast heeft opening_hours één van de, zo niet de meest formele syntax. Vrije tekst (comment) moet daarom tussen aanhalingstekens.
P.S. Bij het zoeken naar de haargalerij op internet meldt google "Permanent gesloten", ik heb daarom de door mij gevonden website niet toegevoegd.
Der Troisdorfer (2026-02-02 09:06:45+00:00): Testbenachrichtigung
rarad74 (2026-02-01 09:00:56+00:00): Hi. Please use Mapbox imagery . Bing are older than 8 years. Thanks.
Hopla57 (2026-02-02 10:27:21+00:00): Salut,
Attention, tu as supprimé des attributs contact:housenumber et contact:street déjà présents.
Sûrement une erreur de StreetComplete ?
Bàt.
jbcharron (2026-02-02 17:40:50+00:00): Salut, oui c'est un problème chez Streetcomplete et je crois qu'une correction avait été demandé et ça avait été refusé 😕
Je vais pas si souvent que ça sur le terrain avec Stc donc on devrait pas trop en supprimer
Bonne soirée
Leo Slager (2026-01-31 23:29:38+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Leo Slager (2026-01-31 23:45:30+00:00): Dag Daniel,

Alle begin is moeilijk.
Zo een schuurtje heeft geen naam en adres.
Ik pas het even aan.

Verder is het goed om te weten dat gebouwen en adressen in NL rechtstreeks worden geïmporteerd vanuit de BAG van het kadaster.
Een import van een nieuw gebouw kun je aanvragen in het forum.
Leo Slager (2026-01-31 23:52:07+00:00): Als je wilt aangeven dat het een schuur is dan is building=shed de juiste tag.

Zoiets kun je opzoeken in de wiki.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building
LordGarySugar (2026-02-05 02:06:00+00:00): Thanks for adding these buildings and addresses! As you can see, a large amount of the buildings in Melksham need to be split into individual houses, so your contributions are definitiely appreciated. You can also try enabling 'OSMuk cadastral parcels' in iD's background menu to show property boundaries, which should help identify where to split houses. If you plan on working with a lot of buildings, try the more advanced josm editor with the building tools plugin which makes drawing offset terraces super easy! Happy mapping!
Leo Slager (2026-02-01 00:02:41+00:00): Hoi Daniel,

OSM heeft een heleboel regeltjes die zijn vastgelegd in de wiki.
Alle begin is moeilijk en al doende leer je veel van die regels en hoe je iets opzoekt in de wiki.

Voor een cycleway gldt dat die alleen toegankelijk is voor voetgangers en fietsers.
tags als bicycle, foot, motorvehicle kunnen dus achterwege blijven.

Elke weg in OSM is per definitie geschikt voor twee richtingsverkeer.
oneway=no is dus overbodig.

Nu is NL een fietsland bij uitstek, daus dat onderwerp hebben we tot in details uitgewerkt.
Dat vind je hier:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Cycleway
Tjuro (2026-03-13 20:06:12+00:00): Hallo Menno Arbouw,

Ik zie dat je in deze changeset twee historic=monument hebt toegevoegd.

historic=monument is bedoeld en word gebruikt voor grote gedenktekens, zoals de Arc de Triomphe of de pyramide van austerlitz.

Voor kleinere gedenktekens gebruiken wij historic-memorial

Als het geen gedenkteken is zijn er andere tags zoals tourism=artwork

Ook heb je een gebouw een naam gegeven van een bedrijf.

Bedrijven mogen niet samen op een gebouw getaged worden. Ook is het niet de bedoeling dat je de rechtsvorm overneemt (BV, NV, ZZP etc) dit is geen onderdeel van de naam van een organisatie.

Ik hoop dat je wat hebt aan deze feedback.

Met vriendelijke groet,

Tjuro
Leo Slager (2026-02-01 00:07:30+00:00): OSM is sterk internationaal geörienteerd.
Dus recycling:restafval is dan niet correct.

recycling:waste is dan de correcte tag.

Pas je het zelf aan ?
Alshowaiey (2026-01-31 21:32:11+00:00): السلام عليكم شكرا لمساهمتك في خرائط الشارع المفتوح
ما هو مصدر الاضافة لبرج الاتصال هذا؟
Herman Lee (2026-02-02 06:31:49+00:00): 本修改集已退回，详见：https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177992072
Leo Slager (2026-02-01 00:15:26+00:00): Tja het is een kwestie van interpretatie, maar op grond waarvan denk je dat dit een fietspad is ?
Er zijn geen verkeersborden  (G11, G12a of G13.
Over het algemeen zullen we dus kiezen voor highway=path.

De situatie hier was dus al correct op de kaart gezet.
ik pas het even aan.
Leo Slager (2026-02-01 00:18:26+00:00): We nemen je niets kwalijk, in het begin hebben we allemaal dit soort fouten gemaakt.
Al doende leert men, dus laat dit je niet weerhouden om verder te gaan met mappen.
Senihtu (2026-04-25 11:08:08+00:00): Hallo
und schön, daß Du bei OSM mitmachst!
Kennst Du schon diese Seite:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Abk%C3%BCrzungen
Deshalb wäre besser, wenn Du hier den Straßennamen ausschreiben würdest.
Auf noch viele Jahre gemeinsames Mappen!
eggie (2026-02-02 13:30:39+00:00): Dag Daniel,

Zorg dat wegen altijd een verbinding hebben met elkaar. Bv door een nodeverbinding. Het routeert anders niet. Ook loze eindjes hebben geen zin.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=177928410

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-02-02 13:31:50+00:00): De verbindingen bij kruisende wegen gemaakt
Leo Slager (2026-02-01 00:35:36+00:00): direction=forward was correct.

Zie ook de wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dgive_way

Pas je het zelf aan ?
NeisBot (2026-02-01 06:56:48+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 12 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/358129068 v1 | 8 crossings
https://osm.org/way/358129060 v1 | 3 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/3631149379 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177928704
NeisReview (2026-02-11 05:07:32+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/178349200
somehundred (2026-01-31 17:04:19+00:00): Hello! There are a few issues with these changes.

First, you deleted some tags for no reason. check_date tag specifies the last time when a place was surveyed in person. Editors like EveryDoor add it automatically when a change to the place is made. Removing outdoor_seating also wasn't needed. The place indeed doesn't have outdoor seating.

Second, don't completely delete places that have closed. Instead, remove all relevant tags from the place and leave only shop=vacant or disused:*=* Choose whatever fits the best. This solution records the history of a place.
Here's documentation about these two tags: 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused:*
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dvacant

Lastly, I want to discuss changing the sia leno s from bar to a cafe. I was physically inside there and confirmed that it's a bar despite the fact that there's a sign outside saying that it's a cafe. The only things available without waiting were drinks and a small selection of snacks. The main course had to be ordered from a menu. What was the reason to change the place's tagging to cafe?

P.S. Please let me know if you're okay to talk in Latvian.
ronery-mapper (2026-01-31 18:28:43+00:00): Hello,

>you deleted some tags for no reason

My bad, always want to minimize something.

>don't completely delete places that have closed

Noted

>I want to discuss changing the sia leno s from bar to a cafe

The place doesn't have an appearance of a bar, mostly people visit it to have their mid-day meals (yes you have to wait a couple of minutes for it to be warmed up). It's more like a canteen/cafe + bar.
ronery-mapper (2026-01-31 18:29:38+00:00): Feel free to revert some changes, as I don't know how to do it myself.
somehundred (2026-01-31 21:35:03+00:00): I fixed the issues. We can leave the eatery tagged as cafe, it isn't completely wrong.
Leo Slager (2026-01-31 23:32:59+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Herman Lee (2026-02-02 06:31:44+00:00): 本修改集已退回，详见：https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177992072
Leo Slager (2026-01-31 23:35:07+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
EdGeg44 (2026-02-01 07:21:01+00:00): Super, dankjewel Leo!
BCNorwich (2026-01-31 16:36:13+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Your location for the mosque is in the middle of a public park, I think it's unlikely to be situated here. The tagged postcode is for the properties on Ashburnham Road Close by.

Could you please respond to this comment and if you need help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.
Frank_1 (2026-01-31 17:44:47+00:00): Hi there,

Thanks for raising it. It was supposed to be placed right at the edge where some of the land was recently acquired. I think that as I was trying to add other details, I accidentally dragged across the map.

Thanks
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-31 17:11:53+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3328072477
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1095489901

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Herman Lee (2026-02-02 06:31:39+00:00): 本修改集已退回，详见：https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177992072
Hufkratzer (2026-02-01 21:41:46+00:00): Hi,
Isn't https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1472956013 a riding arena like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1433742120 (tags leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian instead of leisure=horse_riding )?
randomhacks (2026-02-05 10:17:03+00:00): Thanks for spotting this.  You are correct.  I've changed this.
Taya_S (2026-01-31 16:10:56+00:00): Hallo WillyO65,

AUB niet zomaar privégegevens van anderen publiekelijk delen. 

Groeten,
Taya Snijder.
B_MEL (2026-02-06 19:37:03+00:00): Importado sin querer desde la cuenta principal.
Meeliz (2026-01-31 16:45:57+00:00): reverted
LiCravate (2026-01-31 16:41:17+00:00): je sais pas comment edit sur ce site : la rue oberhoffen de mon edit a un ilot de securité
Taya_S (2026-01-31 16:08:30+00:00): Reverted vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177931877
Taya_S (2026-01-31 16:08:31+00:00): Reverted vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177931877
NeisBot (2026-01-31 16:06:13+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your changesets and noticed that the cumulative count of your recent edits (5 changesets) shows that 354 of your last 355 changes were deletions. This is quite an unusual proportion, so I wanted to check with you.

Could you please confirm whether these deletions were intentional or if they may have occurred by mistake?

#DeletionsCheck #Cumulative
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?uid=23773633
EneaSuper (2026-01-31 19:00:35+00:00): Ci starebbe mappare tombe, statue e opere d'arte come fatto al cimitero monumentale di Staglieno a Genova!
rarad74 (2026-01-31 17:47:33+00:00): Salut. Utilizeaza te rog imaginile Mapbox deoaree sunt cele mai recente. Bing sunt mai vechi de 10 ani.
CristinaCat (2026-01-31 18:14:59+00:00): Salut. Am notat, merci!
ItsAlyx (2026-02-03 22:04:11+00:00): please avoid changesets that span massive geographical areas
Lostmonkey (2026-03-20 12:26:00+00:00): Hi,
Regarding a charge point (man_made=charge_point) you added: I have added a charging station (amenity=charging_station), as individual charge points are not meant to be mapped without one. A charging station can contain multiple charge points. If there is only a single charge point, it is (according to the wiki) probably sufficient to map just a charging station. But in any case, a charge point should never be added without an associated charging station.
Ati15 (2026-02-01 08:05:30+00:00): Dzięki. Byłem przejazdem i nie miałem nawet jak dodać więcej info typu godziny otwarcia itd.
J Peter Young (2026-01-31 16:43:45+00:00): I also have good GPS data for the entire road, looking to get that uploaded.
Alshowaiey (2026-01-31 21:00:04+00:00): يعطيك العافية على مساهمتك في خرائط الشارع المفتوح 
تم تعديل الرابط حق القرية العالمية ليتضمن https://www.
kk502 (2026-02-01 14:56:14+00:00): الله يعافيك كنت بضيفه بس قلت بدون شكله ارتب
AlexTopoRO (2026-01-31 16:46:30+00:00): Libertatii* ))
Jordi MF (2026-03-10 21:20:49+00:00): Este usuario ha eliminado la etiqueta "name:en=*".
Por otra parte, en castellano, la denomianción "A Guarda" es perectamente habitual en español: https://www.elmundo.es/elmundo/2008/01/25/suvivienda/1201263211.html; https://www.elmundo.es/cronica/2026/03/06/699efb53e9cf4ab3248b457a.html; https://www.abc.es/espana/abci-seprona-precinta-tramos-montes-guarda-pontevedra-trampas-anti-ciclistas-201903191436_video.html; https://elpais.com/ccaa/2016/03/20/galicia/1458500243_926824.html.

Este usuario tiene otra cuenta creada como: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Repasus
lyctkel (2026-02-01 20:26:31+00:00): Hi bkleipool,
way 1472986113 doesn't look like a bridge to me. A bridge is a way/street etc. that crosses something and there is space under it. At least, that's how I would define a bridge.
The closest I could find is https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:ford%3Dstepping_stones .
But that's no perfect match either.
These stepping stones are made of wood. So I would add surface=wood. That combination is used 25 times in OSM.
I added a Panoramax link and a note here.
What do you think about that?
Kind regards,
lyctkel
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-31 18:01:24+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8635731546
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/532700848

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
mueschel (2026-02-01 09:58:52+00:00): Hi,
could you check your recent edits of sockets? I found many keys that are not used in any other place. Please have a look to the list of socket types, and use only those - the exact spelling matters!
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:socket:*
Kovoschiz (2026-02-01 17:17:15+00:00): Where has this been discussed? I don't favor `=traffic_island` as it may be used for the `=footway` connecting to transit  platforms.
Kovoschiz (2026-02-01 17:18:52+00:00): It would at least need to be distinguished by `traffic_island=` `=crossing` vs `=platform`
Gicorada (2026-02-01 17:27:55+00:00): Hi, it hasn't been discussed, I'm not doing mass edits to tags with many usages, and since crossing_island is not documented anywhere, I decided to replace it with the documented tag where it's suitable with aerial imagery (in other regions I found crossing_island that was actually nor a "crossing island" nor a traffic_island). This was maybe the only value that had more than 5 uses by multiple users and was not typo/abbreviation in the ones I modified last days, if it was more used I would've written at least on the community to get opinions from other mappers.
Kovoschiz (2026-02-01 17:38:56+00:00): No, I believe you should discuss any mass re-tagging. `{{PossibleSynonym}}` has not been used on wiki yet either.  
Yes, I have documented it myself https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Crosswalk_clean-up#Crosswalk_as_lines
Another use for this is allowing regex or prefix search of `footway=crossing*` for all crosswalk parts. `=traffic_island` would need an union, and excluding non-crosswalk traffic island walkways.
Gicorada (2026-02-01 17:39:32+00:00): > It would at least need to be distinguished...
I agree with this (obviously, more precise the tagging is, the better routers etc. can use the data). But I'm not sure which could be the difference between these, as according to taginfo the values aren't used or documented. Maybe this could be the start of a traffic_island standardization proposal?
Gicorada (2026-02-01 17:55:43+00:00): I posted my last comment before your comment, so I didn't read about your proposal. The draft proposal is interesting, but at the moment as traffic_island is the de facto standard I would stick to it at least in my edits even to long traffic islands. I actually think that footway=crossing crossing:island=yes (or other values) could suit better osm, using bremen schema like many other crossing tags. I would be interested on working to refine this proposal, maybe you can also try to ask for opinions on discord osmworld to see if the proposal could be moved further?
aTarom (2026-01-31 20:23:38+00:00): Eliminar la acera y añadir una pared... normal no és, no?
Entiendo que no recibirás aviso de este comentario, pero hay que seguir intentando cada vez... #acr
VictorIE (2026-02-01 13:55:52+00:00): Hi,

Welcome to OSM and thank you for your contributions.

Please be aware that there are agreed standards for certain things, e.g. B-roads are mapped as highway=secondary. :) https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/526811183/
b-jazz (2026-02-03 21:28:33+00:00): I'm not sure what you're trying to accomplish. You are creating duplicates of existing fairways and laying them on top of the fairway that is already there, sometimes with trivial modifications. I'm deleting what I find, but please be aware so that you don't do this again in the future. Thanks.
arjunaraoc (2026-02-17 00:52:29+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177936336
Taya_S (2026-01-31 18:27:23+00:00): Objecten zijn puur gekopieerd zonder bewerkingen. De reden hiervoor was om privégegevens te verbergen.