piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2025-12-29 17:20:24+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13416176958 v1

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Ostéopathe à La Garenne Colombes"
---
Par exemple, une version plus neutre et factuelle de ta description pourrait être : "Ostéopathe à La Garenne Colombes"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description
NeisRevert (2026-01-07 07:09:18+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/176931067

Only the affected tags were deleted; other unrelated data was left untouched
❤️‍🔥 (2026-01-28 04:29:24+00:00): you changed the entire 600km² forest (https://osm.org/relation/2891664 ) into scrub - is that intentional?
felipeeugenio (2025-12-29 20:55:07+00:00): Hola. Buenas tardes. Borró varios locales comerciales. Ya no existen? o fue un error?

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176587931
Luckas San Martín (2025-12-30 02:12:43+00:00): Hola, Felipe. Sí, esos locales no existen hace más de 5 años. Anotaré bien las numeraciones y nombres de los locales nuevos y los agregaré. Saludos.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176587931
felipeeugenio (2025-12-30 11:52:30+00:00): ok, saludos y gracias.
Filip009 (2025-12-29 19:16:21+00:00): Zdravím, prečo to prerobenie natural=wood na natural=tree_row?
Why_not_4_n0t (2026-01-07 18:35:36+00:00): z dôvodu presnosti a detailu.
JonnyPhongaskornAmloi (2026-01-19 21:16:25+00:00): ที่ดักไขมันหรืออีกที่ดักขยะในคูหรือคลองก็คนเริ่มโครงการเขาก็ตั้งใจไห้มันมีประโยชน์แบบนั้นนะคับ เพราะที่ดักไขมันหรือดักขยะเทคานหนาเกินความจำเป็นของคนคิดแบบก็แค่ที่ดักนะ คารที่เทไว้รับน้ำหนักของบ้านได้เลยคับ
Frans S (2026-01-02 17:15:52+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Did you read the instructions on what to map?
Buildings need to be mapped. Residential areas is optional.
Please map all buildings.
Best regards
eggie (2025-12-29 18:57:53+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
CurlingMan13 (2026-01-06 20:52:20+00:00): Please try better with positioning.  I don't think an ALPR does any good facing a tree.....
WildestOne (2026-01-06 20:54:55+00:00): Camera is on the side of the treeline facing Orleans St, it's incorrectly positioned in someone's driveway on the map
Dixiegirlrebel (2026-01-06 22:02:11+00:00): I'm sorry. My bad. I at least marked it. It wasn't marked at all.
WildestOne (2026-01-06 22:08:36+00:00): Thank you!
cepesko (2026-04-26 04:45:23+00:00): Hallo chriz,
wenn ein relativ vergängliches Objekt wie der Hochsitz, vor 10 Jahren von mir eingetragen, nicht mehr vor Ort zu sehen ist, bitte einfach löschen.
Dankeschön
chriz_osm (2026-04-29 10:18:16+00:00): Hallo cepesko,

Danke für die Rückmeldung, werde ich zukünftig so handhaben. Habe den Hochsitz jetzt gelöscht.
Frans S (2025-12-30 09:59:34+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please check better to locate buildings.
You overlooked quite a lot.
Best regards
Frans S (2025-12-30 10:04:52+00:00): I mapped the overlooked buildings .
You mapped 18 buildings here. I added another 20.
Best regards
TinPetreković (2026-01-09 08:56:59+00:00): The node that was accidentally created has been removed along with the restriction before the underpass in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177015896
AgusQui (2026-01-15 03:49:57+00:00): Esto se hace con relaciones tipo boundary=police
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-05 14:55:20+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1462629851/history has building = 3 that was added in this edit
What this tag means? Numeric value is unexpected here and it is unclear what it means
NeisBot (2025-12-30 06:22:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13416293733 v1

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Math tutoring center"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description
NeisRevert (2026-01-07 07:09:25+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/176931073
(Deleted leftovers after several edits)
mcliquid (2026-01-01 09:24:40+00:00): Hello brt1ituk, thank you for fixing the address issue and for your contributions with iD.

A quick note about this changeset: it includes edits ranging from GB to IT, covering locations that are far apart. Even when addressing similar issues, grouping such distant edits into a single changeset makes it harder for other mappers to review or revert individual changes.

For future edits, please consider:

* keeping each changeset focused on one local area,
* uploading your changes before moving on to a different city or country,
* creating separate changesets when working on issues in distant regions.

You can find more information here:
[https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets)

Thanks for your understanding, and happy mapping!
AndersAndersson (2025-12-29 22:58:26+00:00): I added wood_provided, since that was the meaning of the tag when it was added. Any more cases like this?
Yukiro (2025-12-30 00:13:39+00:00): Yeah, You can see my other changesets
AndersAndersson (2025-12-30 23:50:26+00:00): Maybe you could correct those cases where you removed data that just should have been updated?
Yukiro (2025-12-31 07:36:00+00:00): I checked the wiki when I was fixing the tags and on the fireplace one there was no such tag
Yukiro (2025-12-31 07:37:24+00:00): Also there is two different tags, both very poorly documented
stasiu512 (2025-12-29 18:20:31+00:00): skąd tu horse=no? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1462633898#map=18/54.316745/18.506012
Szymson (2025-12-29 18:24:47+00:00): Na OMT znowu dodał tunel jako droga leśna, mimo że była dyskusja o tym na Discord, że to przejście dla dzikich zwierząt
zdzichu (2025-12-29 18:26:08+00:00): Koń się nie zmieści na tej ścieżce.
stasiu512 (2025-12-29 19:40:33+00:00): Tym tagiem (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:horse) oznaczamy drogi z prawnym ograniczeniem, a nie takie gdzie jest to przydatna informacja. Jeśli chcesz dodać szczegółowo informacje o szerokości możesz użyć tagu https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:width. Ścieżkę poprawiłem razem z geometrią w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176595605. Pozdrawiam
Viajero Perdido (2025-12-29 18:20:17+00:00): Suggested TODO for whoever reactivates things after new bridge complete:
search "construction" or "access=private" to be sure nothing missed.
eggie (2025-12-29 19:01:17+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Szymson (2025-12-29 18:18:05+00:00): To nie jest żaden tunel przejezdny tylko przejście dla zwierząt.
zdzichu (2025-12-29 18:24:32+00:00): Jechałem tam dzisiaj rowerem, z naprzeciwka ktoś jechał samochodem. Jest ubity grunt połączony z drogami z obu stron.
Może oficjalnie to nie jest przejazd, ale *faktycznie* jest.
Szymson (2025-12-29 18:26:50+00:00): No to trochę tak jakbyś zmapował wydeptaną ścieżkę przez tory kolejowe, bo ludzie tak chodzą, a jak wiadomo to jest nielegalne. Z resztą była już dyskusja o tym na Discord. Dopóki budowa OMT nie skończy się w 100% nie należy dodawać takich dzikich skrótów, chyba że pojawi się w terenie odpowiednie oznakowanie.
stasiu512 (2025-12-29 18:37:18+00:00): Takie ścieżki przez tory również mapujemy z węzłem z tagiem hazard=illegal_crossing. W tym przypadku widzę że przejazd przez rowerzystów jest mocno używany -  https://files.fm/f/w76ze3t4pt. Jak to wygląda na miejscu, są jakieś znaki zakazu? tabliczki informujące o możliwej karze? Czy faktycznie coś grozi za przejazd/przejście w tym miejscu? Jeśli nie to wg mnie path nie jest złym rozwiązaniem, jeśli przejście nie jest zabronione ludzie z niego korzystają? Inna sprawa jeśli jest oznakowane w jakiś sposób
Szymson (2025-12-29 18:58:40+00:00): Miesiąc temu inny użytkownik twierdził że tędy (po placu budowy) PTTK wyznaczyło szlaki piesze, także nic mnie już nie zdziwi. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175677446
Jak poprosiłem o źródło tej informacji to do dzisiaj nie otrzymałem odpowiedzi.
Yog Sot (2025-12-29 20:12:48+00:00): Obstawiam, że @zdzichu pomylił to przejście z szerokim przejazdem pareset metrów na wschód. 

Natomiast to przejście tutaj ewidentnie jest użytkowane przez ludzi, ale samochody w ten tunel raczej nie wejdą.
zdzichu (2025-12-29 20:31:30+00:00): Nie ma żadnych oznaczeń, słupków zakazów.
Wygląda z jednej strony tak: https://youtu.be/oHBvJ1mFkfc?si=rnicPpnx9MLT3q8E&t=229 (od 3:49, klawiszem . (kropka) można poklatkowo przesuwać).
Z drugiej strony tak: https://photos.app.goo.gl/3wvd3VvpUpAqZktF7
Yog Sot (2025-12-29 22:42:31+00:00): Zdzichu, zwracam honor, teraz czekamy aż @Szymson się pokaja i cofnie swoja cofke ;D
Szymson (2025-12-30 04:08:28+00:00): No ja bym się wstrzymał z tym entuzjazmem. Przypominam, to nadal plac budowy. Serio, chętnie was zweryfikuję jak wykonawca w 100% odda inwestycję. Póki co dalibyście jakieś  informal=yes.
Yog Sot (2025-12-30 12:50:48+00:00):  informal=yes dla autek to byłby niezły gig ;D
nieformalny zakaz dla ciężarówek? ;>
Andrea Musuruane (2025-12-30 09:50:20+00:00): Hello. In Italy, house numbers are never placed on buildings. The house number identifies the external access point leading directly or indirectly from the road to the property (homes, shops, offices, garages, etc.) or to enclosed undeveloped areas (e.g. beach establishments). It is therefore incorrect to associate addr:* tags with a building. You must insert a node at the entrance where the number plate is located and label it appropriately. BR, Andrea
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176591002
eggie (2025-12-29 19:02:28+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  Wellicht private ipv customers?
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Yog Sot (2025-12-29 18:38:41+00:00): potrzymaj mi piwo
stasiu512 (2025-12-29 21:35:51+00:00): Cześć, szlak zaczyna się przy dworcu PKP w Gdańsku
SpinOff (2025-12-29 21:52:03+00:00): Według GPXa ze strony eurovelo, zaczyna się tutaj: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1392854660

https://en.eurovelo.com/ev9/points-of-interest-on-eurovelo

Stara relacja chyba miała kilka nieuporządkowanych linii w okolicy dworca, ale bez źródła ciężko ocenić jak dokładnie przebiega trasa.
SpinOff (2025-12-29 22:26:29+00:00): Ok, udało mi się odtworzyć ten przebieg. Dzięki za czujność

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9424129#map=17/54.353874/18.648198
stasiu512 (2025-12-29 22:31:01+00:00): Super, dziękuję właśnie miałem pisać iż na Hucisku znajdują się pomarańczowe tabliczki więc szlak jak najbardziej aktualny, dziękuję
stasiu512 (2025-12-29 22:37:32+00:00): Zgodnie z oznakowaniem w tereni szlak jest poprowadzony tędy, jesteś w stanie poprawić?https://files.fm/f/rf82xsed3w
stasiu512 (2025-12-29 22:38:26+00:00): Tak samo jak WTR
SpinOff (2025-12-30 10:48:04+00:00): Zrobione
stasiu512 (2025-12-30 12:19:56+00:00): Dziękuję, dobra robota!
9_tab (2025-12-29 19:40:38+00:00): what is the basis for this edit?
mueschel (2025-12-29 19:58:59+00:00): 'year_of_construction' is a common tag. 'contruction_date' (sic!) is not.
9_tab (2025-12-29 20:03:16+00:00): It should have been "construction_date", the more common tag. Sohow I think you'd know that.
Rainero (2026-03-30 15:59:11+00:00): Revert changeset/180637000
wegen nicht zulässiger Quelle (Bayernatlas).
Kamil Kalata (2025-12-29 18:47:02+00:00): Errata do komentarza zestawu zmian: niepotrzebnie zamknięta linia granicy
9_tab (2025-12-29 19:37:31+00:00): this edit is messy, you are linking random Wikipedia articles. Bear in mind that Switzerland is multilingual.
mueschel (2025-12-29 19:57:47+00:00): Wikipedia manages a full list of all languages of the article. There is no reason to duplicate this list in OSM. The linked article is either in the local majority language or English.
9_tab (2025-12-29 20:00:31+00:00): It's acceptable to link several articles. Plus, there is no reason to link Mercure from an article about Meiniger just because it's in the "local majority language" you somehow determined. Please refrain from making such messes and revert this.
mueschel (2025-12-29 20:27:05+00:00): Please read the description of the key. The very first line says "Only provide a link to a single Wikipedia article, which should be to the article in the primary (local) language for the subject"
mueschel (2025-12-29 20:28:49+00:00): There is indeed one wrong link added by mistake, I will fix this.
9_tab (2025-12-29 20:43:23+00:00): Your script appears to be broken. Has this automated edit been approved? 

I don't see anything in Key:wikipedia#Secondary_languages mandating your edits.
mueschel (2025-12-29 21:07:11+00:00): script? automated edit? What do you mean?

The wiki is very clear: 
"link to a single Wikipedia article", 
"in the primary (local) language"
"a single wikipedia tag is sufficient"
9_tab (2025-12-30 09:34:02+00:00): Your large scale (broken) edits independent of any location and theme suggest automation.

The page you mention doesn't say you should remove Italian links and only keep German ones as you did at changeset/176614792 . The option of adding a country code offers the possibility of multiple links.

I understand there may be no multilinguism in Germany, but you are not editing anything related to Germany here. So removing anything that is not in German somehow defeats the point of having a locally built map.
9_tab (2025-12-30 09:34:38+00:00): read "language code", not "country code".
mueschel (2025-12-30 09:37:41+00:00): Please check the history of the objects. Your impression of my edits don't match what I did.
9_tab (2025-12-29 19:42:00+00:00): I'm not sure if this is helpful. What's the basis for this edit?
mueschel (2025-12-29 20:00:13+00:00): the value of the wikipedia tag contains the language, it is not repeated in the key.
9_tab (2025-12-29 20:04:22+00:00): It can be repeated in the key if it's not the usual language.
mueschel (2025-12-29 20:35:02+00:00): No, there is no duplication done, see
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikipedia#Secondary_languages
9_tab (2025-12-29 20:38:18+00:00): It says  "In these circumstances, use the format wikipedia:fr='page title' (e.g. wikipedia:en=*) for the secondary languages. " 

It was already noted in changeset/176592977 that your script is broken
mueschel (2025-12-29 20:42:00+00:00): There is only one link here, and there is no need for a language code in the key.
9_tab (2025-12-29 20:42:43+00:00): there is no need for your edit
Glassman (2025-12-31 00:09:57+00:00): You might want to add the tags amenity=cafe + cuisine=coffee.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176593424
peterhjames (2025-12-29 19:01:29+00:00): Not sure about how to pin the Post Office inside Londis. It's a just a till in the Londis counter, but with different opening times. I created a separate node in a different category, but with the same name and a note on the Post Office one.
topolusitania (2025-12-30 15:55:12+00:00): Olá
Bem vindo ao Openstreetmap
Nesta tua edição, fiquei com algumas duvidas.
O cabaret da coxa é o nome da vivenda que está mapeada ao lado ? É um turismo de habitação ?
Onde se situa exactamente o stand de tiro que assinalaste ?
Cumprimentos
TL
tswsl (2025-12-29 19:05:49+00:00): Some gaps remain in Cardiff around the arena construction - diversions will need surveying.
Similarly, I don't know how well signed some of the other alternative sections are, but the relation is now as tidy and well-formed as I can make it.
user_23462187 (2025-12-29 19:31:58+00:00): Ahoj, příště prosím změny lépe popiš. Z komentáře nejde poznat, jaké úpravy jsi provedl. Komentář změn je důležitý pro ostatní mappery. 
Díky
Michal Santi (2025-12-29 19:54:53+00:00): Ahoj, děkuji za upozornění. Budu se snažit být přesnější.
Hezký den
BCNorwich (2025-12-30 07:39:38+00:00): Hi, There is no need to add the tag oneway=no to these roads. In the absence of a oneway tag it is implied that the highway is twoway. 

The wiki says "oneway = no
oneway=no is used to confirm that (a part of) a street is not a oneway street. (Use only in order to avoid mapping errors in areas where e.g. oneway streets are common, or to override defaults.) "

Regards Bernard
BCNorwich (2025-12-31 08:35:49+00:00): Hi, I've removed Way: 1462652014 and Way: 1462652015 because they duplicate existing highways, this duplication could have caused disruption to routing. If a road needs correcting please correct the existing highway thus keeping it's history intact.

Regards Bernard
yelisey90 (2025-12-30 07:16:01+00:00): Just a small note: the road leading to a parking lot should be tagged just as highway=service, without service=parking_aisle. Even the "main" road within parking lot that is necessarily used by cars to get in and out is just plain highway=service. The tag service=parking_aisle should only be used for smaller inner roads within the parking lot that separate rows of individual parking spaces.
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-01 06:24:00+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13416479291
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/732166064

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
chath_tsu (2025-12-30 00:22:26+00:00): Thank you for helping to map out bike infrastructure! Unfortunately I am reverting your edits for the bike paths. The reason is that, for bike ways to be mapped as separate ways and tagged as cycle paths, they have to be not inherently part of the roadway and physically separated from vehicle travel lanes. For a roadside bike path, there has to be physical barriers separating it from traffic (eg. curbs, jersey barriers, guardrails, planter strips). Otherwise, on-road bike lanes, including those with painted buffer but no physical barrier, are represented as cycleway= tags on the main roadway ways. You can find more information here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dcycleway and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway. I will make sure to check your edit areas are tagged properly for the cycle infra. Thanks for your effort and happy mapping!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176594889
seascorpio82 (2025-12-30 01:14:44+00:00): Gotcha.  I'm new here, so still learning.  Thanks!
chath_tsu (2025-12-30 01:16:23+00:00): Thank you for your understanding!
nullroute (2025-12-29 23:44:09+00:00): Hi HyperLoop555,

Thanks for your first contribution and adding additional information to the map.

I just wanted to share a convention used on OSM. In general abbreviations shouldn't be used for street names. In this case, the name should be "South Hickory Creek Court."

Not a big deal but just wanted to make you aware in case you make further edits.

Thanks,
nullroute
HyperLoop555 (2025-12-30 00:50:54+00:00): Thanks for the info.  This area is a new housing development, and I did not quite understand how to indicate addresses for each home.  I am a map editor for Waze, and it is a little clearer over there.  Perhaps You can guide me to the proper information, and I will flesh out this new community.
Thank You
nullroute (2025-12-30 04:31:24+00:00): Sure the ideal way to indicate addresses for each home would be to create a building for each home and add the address information to the building.

Here is an example:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1308380211

The best source of information would be the OSM wiki.

Buildings:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Buildings

Addresses:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses

There are tools to make the process easier. I believe the Rapid editor provides addressing information and AI features for adding buildings.

You can also get similar functionality with the JOSM editor with the MapWithAI plugin.
Szymson (2025-12-29 20:02:43+00:00): Coś Ty tu za fantazje natworzył teraz? xD
Szymson (2025-12-29 20:04:03+00:00): Chodzi mi o to: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1462658329
Yog Sot (2025-12-29 20:09:26+00:00): bo fantazja jest dla każdego. musisz pojechac zobaczać jak jest fajnie ;D
Szymson (2025-12-29 20:13:08+00:00): Po prostu próbuję zrozumieć co ten fragment drogi ma na celu? Po północnej stronie OMT masz z obu stron bramy/furtki, także dalej nigdzie się nie przedostaniesz.
Yog Sot (2025-12-29 20:15:44+00:00): ja myslę, że ten most jednak z jakiegos powodu zbudowali i nie opłotujo go. :}
Szymson (2025-12-29 20:20:41+00:00): No, może żeby zwierzyna mogła sobie przejść z jednej strony drogi ekspresowej na drugą? Nazwa tego obiektu to PZDs-29 co w wolnym rozwinięciu skrótu oznacza przejście dolne dla średnich zwierząt.
Yog Sot (2025-12-29 20:26:58+00:00): w sumie jak by postawili słupki było by super by autka nie jedziły, ale teraz chyba jeszcze mogo ;]
Musisz powycieczkować. 
I te bramy z płotami chyba też są nie do końca projektowo chyba
martinst (2025-12-30 11:07:11+00:00): Hallo,
wieso hast Du bei Way 1462661746 etc. vehicle=permissive eingetragen? Das ist kein Wert, der sich aus üblichen Verkehrszeichen ergibt.
(siehe https://trafficsigns.osm-verkehrswende.org/DE?signs=)
Gruß Martin
NeisBot (2025-12-30 06:22:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13414075806 v2

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Company providing services"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description
NeisReview (2026-01-07 07:09:26+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/176771810
Thanks @NeisBot
eggie (2025-12-29 21:35:52+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-12-29 21:57:09+00:00): Drent,
Wanneer hier een bord staat art 461 zou het kunnen.

Meestal taggen we access=permissive op Eigen terrein. Dan blijft het routeren voor bezorgdiensten.

MVG
eggie
marcmarti (2025-12-31 02:22:17+00:00): Hi, an error appeared for self-intersecting ways.
eggie (2025-12-29 21:55:15+00:00): Tip  foot=yes hoef je niet te taggen op een voetpad. 
Gr eggie