piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
5m4u9 (2025-08-19 05:12:29+00:00): hola, quizá no quedó bien entendido porque no debemos usar edificios de casas en áreas de terrenos. son dos cosas distintas.

seguramente estás pensando, pero no "veo" los terrenos en el mapa y necesito ver. En este caso, tendrías que usar el mapa que te permite "dibujar encima del mapa y mostrar lo que quieras" -> https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/
grzegorz75jan (2025-08-18 21:20:16+00:00): A chcesz wycofania twojego dzieła i w uzasadnieniu zobaczyć . taką samą jaką dałeś w opisie zmiany ?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian

https://youtu.be/xBMIoypkdI4?list=PLTgtPjgzssHzsgAqYbi2QfRoRk1S9ioX5&t=2596
grzegorz75jan (2025-08-18 21:21:52+00:00): Widzę, że poprzednie opisy też masz bogate. Znajdę błąd i poleci wszystko z takim samym szacunkiem jakim darzysz innych.
stillhart (2026-03-29 09:12:17+00:00): Hi, maybe you can help me. Should superchargers be in english names in japan? Or is there a "correct" translation?
Bzzz (2026-03-29 20:09:23+00:00): I'm no expert in terms of OSM conventions, so I cannot tell if the primary name should be in Japanese or English. For the secondary name fields however I strongly prefer having both names available.
Regarding "official" translations - the Tesla website is my reference. Changing country from JP to any English speaking one will also change the name of the supercharger, and that should be the official name of the location. Note: Both names might change over time, especially when another SuC is built nearby.
Taya_S (2025-08-18 19:13:47+00:00): Reverted Berlin name vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170636809
eggie (2025-08-18 20:14:59+00:00): Dag Rijk, Je vraagt feedback. Wanneer er geen pad meer is kan het uiteraard weg. 
Paden die nog herkenbaar zijn op luchtfoto's taggen weg meestal als disused:highway=path .  Dat voorkomt opnieuw intekenen.

MVG
eggie
OddlyAngled (2025-08-19 15:16:04+00:00): hi! the trail updates look to be a bit further off than the current Strava heatmap + 3DEP LiDAR data implies. was there an issue on the ground with the existing path? satellite is often misaligned around this part of the park
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170637090
Keith Helbley (2025-08-27 14:18:43+00:00): Hey, thanks for checking it out! feel free to revert of modify, I made the change after hiking the trail and recording GPS track here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Keith%20Helbley/traces/12042847

you are correct, it is steep canyon and GPS is pretty bad, so I went not only with the data I collected, but from what I observed while hiking the trail to try and reflect the most significant turns and trail shape I traveled.
Keith Helbley (2025-08-27 14:22:17+00:00): I'm sorry for not putting that detail in the changeset description, I do many edits and get pretty lazy with the detailed notes, focusing on improving as much of the map as I can before I forget my trips!
NieWnen (2025-08-19 18:03:33+00:00): Nie do końca rozumiem co ma na celu łączenie chodnika z krawędziami peronu?

Nie mówię, że to błąd, bo chyba nie, ale też nie wiem, czy jest sens dodawać takie skrawki.

Oczywiście połączenie między zejściami z wiaduktu ma bardzo dużo sensu i to co zostało dodane
w 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170624492

było bardzo dobre (ten łącznik do schodów na wiadukt).

Natomiast w tej zmianie już zostało usunięte, czego nie rozumiem?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1423063709

https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=170637164

Ogólnie to mam wątpliwości odnośnie routingu po `highway=platform`/`railway=platform` zależnie od aplikacji (część może je zignorować), więc tu bym proponował nie łączyć do krawędzi, a właśnie trzymać taki pojedynczy łącznik `highway=footway` między schodami. 
Okrążenie dookoła peronu, które niczego nie łączy/do niczego nie prowadzi (choćby biletomat) jest raczej zbędne, bo sam obszar peronu jest już zmapowany (to tak odnośnie też innych zmian).

A jak coś, to większość `surface=paving_stones`, nie jest `smoothness=excellent` co najwyżej `smoothnes=good`, chyba że to akurat te cieniutkie duże płyty gładkie jak tafla szkła.

--
Ogólnie to dokonujesz bardzo wielu zmian w danym miejscu, może warto chwilę rozważyć, co chce się zmapować, a nie tak dodawać i usuwać? :P
driedfish (2025-08-19 18:12:36+00:00): Usuwałem przez to że dostawałem od ludzi sprzeczne informacje dotyczące tego czy warto łączyć te przejścia czy nie, według niektórych był to błąd, który może wprowadzić routery w błąd. I dodałem przez to połączenia z peronem aby routing szedł krawędzią peronu (co też nie jest świetne). Można wrócić do wersji z przejściem.
driedfish (2025-08-19 18:14:13+00:00): Ogólnie nie znalazłem na to jakiegoś standardu w społeczności, bo jeżeli zejście nie łączy się z krawędziami peronu to routery nie bardzo wykrywają że można tamtędy przejść
driedfish (2025-08-19 18:17:35+00:00): Poza tym routing nieogarniający multipolygonów to też problem, ale to w przypadku mojej innej zmiany chyba z tagiem access=yes.
Taya_S (2025-08-18 19:31:13+00:00): Reverted Berlin name vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170637380
Filip009 (2025-08-19 12:28:42+00:00): Zdravím, nie je nutné vytvárať aj bod, aj do plochy pridať, že sa jedná o pizzériu. Každý má iný preferovaný spôsob, ale použitie oboch naraz nie je správne. Ja uprednostňujem body.
mueschel (2025-08-26 10:09:33+00:00): Hi,
could you check the fuel tag here? fuel:h35 or fuel:h70 would be common, h370 looks like a mistake.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13078595871
buy_osmand (2025-08-19 04:05:48+00:00): ٱلسَّلَامُ عَلَيْكُمْ, 
as-salāmu ʿalaykum,

i've intention to mark this changeset as good on OsmCha but was notified," resource not found"
https://osmcha.org/changesets/170637903

so, here it goes," 😳👍Good,
NieWnen (2025-08-19 17:54:19+00:00): W jakim celu?
Tom van Dijk (2025-08-18 19:52:44+00:00): Heeft every door wel een beetje bijzonder getagt. Nou ja...
map per (2025-08-19 09:14:16+00:00): Hello Mario Endrigo ramos,

it looks like there is something wrong with your Organic Maps app, it created hundreds of empty changesets in recent days.

Could you please try to reset the local map editing storage in the app by typing "?eclear" into the search field of your Organic Maps app? Attention: This deletes all map edits that are not uploaded to OpenStreetMap yet.

Thanks and best regards
map per
NorthCrab_upload (2025-08-18 20:34:14+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1156444957
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1349076377

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
custodiankeyy (2025-08-20 12:53:12+00:00): Merhaba, il sınırlarına ilişkin veriye nereden ulaştınız?
Battall (2025-08-25 11:26:06+00:00): İl ve ilçe sınırları için [https://ulasav.csb.gov.tr/dataset/ilce-sinirlari] şöyle veriler mevcut fakat mahalli idarelerin sınırlarından bahsediyorsanız sadece nehri ve kara yolunu eşit derecede bölecek şekilde düzenledim :). Bazı sitelerde sınırları belirtilmiş fakat ne kadar güvenilir bilemiyorum. Manavgat kaymakamlığında dahi net bir sınır çizilmemiş, net veriler için bir ara İlçe İdare ve Denetim Şefliğine mail atacağım.
custodiankeyy (2025-08-25 17:47:04+00:00): Benim hatam. Mahalle sınırlarını kastetmiştim. 

https://webaski.antalya.bel.tr/ adresinde sınırlar gösterilmiş ancak ne kadar tutarlı bilmiyorum. İlk halini haritalandırmış olan Bora Can da bu veriyi kullanarak haritalandırmış. Ancak şu an ilk hali de site ile uyuşmamakta. O yüzden mail atarsanız çok güzel olur.

2. olarak da labellerin yerini sormak istiyorum. HGM Atlas'da yerleri ilk hali gibi gösterilmiş. Sizce hangisi daha doğru? Buna ek olarak aynı değişiklik setinde geçmişi olan Yukarıhisar mahallesini de silip tekrar sıfırdan eklemişsiniz.

Bahsettiğim label değişiklik setiniz:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161712637

Yukarıhisar Mahallesinin eklendiği değişiklik seti:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161709872

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history
Battall (2025-08-26 10:20:32+00:00): Bu Antalya Büyükşehir Belediyesi'nin yayınladığı İmar Planı Askının genel itibarıyla doğru olduğunu fakat mahalleler arası sınırlarda hatalar bulunduğunu düşünüyorum. Misal, Örnek Mahallesi ile Aşağıpazarcı Mahallesi'nin ortak paylaştığı bir alan var. Mahallelerin dış sınırları da biraz 'gelişigüzel' çizilmiş gibi duruyor, noktalar için herhangi bir koordinat bilgisi mevcut değil. Yani X caddesi ile Y bulvarı arasında kalan bölgenin Z mahallesi olduğu biliniyor da sınırlarının kesin noktaları bilinmiyor gibi. Net veriler ve koordinatlar için mail atmakta fayda var.

Etiketlerin olduğu yerler mahalle muhtarlıkların güncel konumlarına işaret ediyor, açıkçası nerede bulunmasının daha doğru olduğunu da pek bilmiyorum. Biraz OpenStreetMap cahiliyim, sık giriş yaptığım söylenemez. Bahsettiğiniz web sitesindeki İmar Planı Askında da farklı bir kullanım var.

Yukarıhisar Mahallesi'ni silip sıfırdan eklediğimi şu an fark ettim doğruyu söylemek gerekirse; 7 ay önce ne oldu da sildim, sehven mı sildim bilmiyorum. Geçmişin saklanmasındaki yararın farkındayım ve bir daha tekrarlamamaya özen göstereceğim.
evgenykatyshev (2025-08-18 20:18:25+00:00): My bad. I finally found a photo with waterfall here

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170638962
BCNorwich (2025-08-19 05:11:50+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The buildings look better when squared up. In the iD editor highlight/select the building, right click on the outline, click the square icon from the menu, shortcut Q.

Regards Bernard.
0x7700e6 (2025-08-19 09:59:45+00:00): Very useful, thanks. A lot of these houses are oddly shaped but there are some square ones that I'll go back and update.
0x7700e6 (2025-08-19 10:06:52+00:00): Actually, just found out this can be applied to a majority of buildings with 90 degree corners. My edits looks so much better now, thank you.
EneaSuper (2025-08-19 11:57:14+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto su OSM!

Ho avuto modo di revisionare questo tuo changeset ed ho notato che hai inserito o modificato dei dati che, a parer mio, potrebbero essere più chiari e completi se discussi, in particolare quelli dell'ospedale Gallino.

Attendo tua risposta, ciao 🙂
Gonéo (2025-10-07 16:41:08+00:00): Bonjour, je vois que tu as passé une partie de la rue des Aulnes de residential à tertiary mais pas la seconde partie. Du coup la continuité n'est pas assurée. Il faudrait l'avoir soit totalement en residential (ce qui est correct même en zone commerciale selon le wiki) soit totalement en tertiary si c'est une liaison importante. Je te laisse voir ce lequel est le plus adapté ?
Cèparlà (2025-10-07 20:45:27+00:00): Bonjour, c’est régularisé en route résidentielles et complété. Cordialement
NieWnen (2025-12-04 00:46:24+00:00): A tu niestety dorzucam zmianę: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175455982

którą pewnie trzeba będzie częściowo cofnąć i poprawić
Javnik (2025-12-04 13:56:28+00:00): Dzięki.
Widziałem, ale przejdę się tam najpierw, żeby nie wyjść na złego wycofywacza :D
eggie (2025-08-19 09:07:29+00:00): Dag kOSMofant,

Je bedoeling is uiteraard goed en de manier waarop ook. 
Dit is wel een heel korte periode.
Beetje op het randje. 
Voor een week zou ik het zelf niet afsluiten met conditional-tagging.
Er zijn immers routers die dan nog naijlen omdat de updates pas een week of zelfs later worden doorgevoerd. 
Tegen de tijd dat het werkt is de afsluiting weer voorbij. 
Het is natuurlijk wel de vraag of je rekening 'moet' houden met de manko's  van de verschillende routers. 

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/tijdelijke-wegafsluitingen-en-nieuwe-wegen-highway-construction/113130

Up to you... 

MVG
eggie
YomanNH (2025-10-21 07:54:45+00:00): Hej, zerkniesz: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5016032 ?
NieWnen (2025-08-22 18:18:10+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170791319

Tak podrzucam jeśli by Ci umknęło, bo dosłownie kilka dni temu zmieniałeś.
Javnik (2025-08-22 22:15:02+00:00): Dzięki, zająłem się tym :)
mueschel (2025-08-26 10:05:24+00:00): Hi,
could you check the turn lanes you added recently? Some got garbled tags like
"left|left;through|through = through|through;right"
Glassman (2025-08-19 16:37:30+00:00): It appears you added a building within a building which another user fixed. In cases like this, just add a node for the teen life center.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170641524
Pilsetkartetajs (2025-08-19 10:30:21+00:00): Bez iemesla vairākas reizes salauzta pareizi iezīmēta relācija. Izmaiņas atcēlu, kā to jau izdarīja cits kartētājs iepriekš.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170641929
Pilsetkartetajs (2025-08-19 10:30:43+00:00): Bez iemesla vairākas reizes salauzta pareizi iezīmēta relācija. Izmaiņas atcēlu, kā to jau izdarīja cits kartētājs iepriekš.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170641929
Enock4seth (2025-08-24 20:01:12+00:00): Hi, if you are not sure about what you are doing on OpenStreetMap just don't upload your contributions. 

Here is a good start https://welcome.openstreetmap.org/ to understanding what OpenStreetMap is and how to contribute usefully. 

I am reverting this changeset as it doesn't make OpenStreetMap any better. 

Find out what the tag you added implies https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tunnel=building%20passage
Enock4seth (2025-08-24 20:07:18+00:00): I only removed the tunnel=building_passage from the entire segment. Please use Good changeset comments https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments and not only hashtags which means nothing.
gendy54 (2025-08-21 18:05:37+00:00): Bonjour,

Je viens de tomber sur ton profil et tes commentaires de changeset. Si tu n'étais pas au courant, voici une règle importante à suivre:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#Faites_de_bons_commentaires_de_groupe_de_modifications

Bonne journée
CartoGlobe (2025-08-21 20:27:47+00:00): Bonjour,

Merci pour le conseil

Bonne journée
Kai Johnson (2025-09-17 23:20:46+00:00): I left you some previous comments on changeset/170849953 and changeset/170849953. The issues in this changeset are mainly the same: disconnecting roads where they are connected and adding bridges where there are none. There seems to be a misunderstanding about how to map the access conditions for the spur roads that go to the wind turbines. Let's straighten that out. The "bridges" like way/1423130930 are another problem. I know the validator doesn't like it when highways and waterways cross, but there are no bridges here -- and the waterway isn't even accurately mapped. Let's agree on how to fix that too.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170643843
MassCartog (2025-09-29 15:32:24+00:00): This person appears to me a bot/spammer. They have added 1000s of fake service roads all over the US for years. Id suggest reporting them.
Kai Johnson (2025-09-29 17:03:24+00:00): The roads in this changeset do exist. The issues are likely a misunderstanding of the conditions on the ground and how to represent them in OSM. (And I'd blame some of the phantom bridges on overly aggressive validation in iD.)

I haven't checked other changesets by this user, but I did notice that they like to use some very recent imagery sources that have roads that don't show up on the typically older Bing/Esri/Maxar imagery.

If you have evidence of improper changesets even after considering the most recent Sentinel-2 imagery, I'd suggest that you comment on those changesets and follow up with DWG if you cannot resolve the issues.
MassCartog (2025-09-29 18:23:19+00:00): Your right I didn't realize dvlpmnt was using sentinel2 imagery. When I looked back over all there edits, I just was a ton of roads that didn't exist anywhere. I cant edit or change my comment, but I want to post here I was wrong, sorry.
dvlpmnt (2025-09-30 13:43:45+00:00): okay @kai 1) I don't know if I appreciate the sanctimonious tone here, your comment(s) comes across a bit patronizing.
2)  yes sure they are not actually bridges. agreed that its the overly aggressive validation in iD. I'm not policing other peoples edits, and my intention is that for future editors (particular for novice editors) who might touch the road(s) don't unintentionally take the other stance when encountering the iD validation and select 'connect the features'. It's a philosophical question of true 'digital twin' representation in the OSM map vs. making the road network useful for consumers in real world applications such as Valhalla or mapbox. 
3) following that last point in 2), there's a tough conundrum between the two purposes of the roads here. You've got the Ocotillo Express Wind Farm and the BLM land. Based off direct communication with the Pattern Energy Site Manager, I was informed about the access restrictions for navigating to the turbines. there is no way to add turn restrictions on BLM 321 such that BLM consumers can navigate down to the SEE towards Davies Valley and the wind farm traffic only enter from BLM 163. yes you can mark up the roads as much as you want/add turn restrictions, but this again, most navigation software is not sophisticated enough to allow for conditional logic on the fact that different user personas can/cannot access these roads. if your destination coordinates is the turbine, you would use the other roads. if your destination coordinates are Davies Valley, you would not. obviously there are real world physical conditions such as gates/etc. that could/will condition access. 

Anyways, I'm not sure what you're prescribing other than just critiquing quality of edit here. open to direction, and can accept that some of my edits were sloppy (which I attempted to partially fix on subsequent edits),  but I am adamant that my edits were net net positive for OSM actual humans consuming OSM derivatives (the intended purpose of maps since time immemorial )
Kai Johnson (2025-09-30 14:13:59+00:00): @dvlpmnt thanks for getting in touch. I noticed you've been doing a lot of work on mapping around energy infrastructure and that's a really great contribution to OSM!

I just think there was some confusion here and I think we can work it out.

If you're there in person, you can see that many of the spur roads have gates and the roads are signposted "Closed to Motorized Vehicles," which presumably means other than the maintenance staff. That's an important distinction because the signage does not otherwise restrict access. And whatever the site manager may say, this is still BLM land and it is open to foot travel or other forms of non-motorized travel.

So, the right way to handle this is to map the gates with "access=private" and tag the turbine spurs (and only the turbine spurs) with "motor_vehicle=private." Fortunately, that's something that most data consumers including routers should understand.

But there's also an important principle here. We're mapping what's on the ground, not mapping things that don't exist in the hopes of getting data consumers to behave a certain way. There aren't any signposted turn restrictions here, so we wouldn't map those. Likewise, there aren't any bridges.

Would you mind if I went back over the areas to take out the bridges and put in access tag where they might be missing?
Kai Johnson (2025-10-02 13:04:30+00:00): I'd like to continue the discussion here and on the other changesets where I've made comments, but I'm going to be out of touch for a few days. Please be patient if it takes me a while to respond to comments.
Kai Johnson (2025-10-17 16:06:51+00:00): It doesn't seem like we're making progress on this discussion. So, what I plan to do is take out the bridges and restore the other ways and tags for the BLM routes and turbine spurs. If you don't agree with those changes or you would come back and undo them later, now is the time to speak up so we can get on the same page.
felipeeugenio (2025-08-19 12:15:09+00:00): Hola James.
De dónda salen estos nombres?
Ni en el SII ni el IGM aparecen con esos nombres.
Por favor, para este tipo de cambios, incluyendo los cambios de categorías de las locaciones, ingresar al chat y preguntar a la comunidad antes. Hay maperos que se especializan en este tipo de cosas.

existe una etiqueta place=farm para este tipo de lugares.

saludos
James2813 (2025-08-19 14:59:57+00:00): Hola Felipe Eugenio. Gracias por la aclaración. Voy a colocar entonces los fundos como "farm". Solo me queda la duda si hay que poner "Fundo X" como nombre o solo el nombre "X".

En el caso de Belén el nombre viene de la página web de Morandé, donde dice que su fundo lleva ese nombre. En realidad varios son nombres que se saben de local. Pero si hay una sección para añadir referencias, puedo hacerlo para que quede más fundamentado. Saludos.
James2813 (2025-08-19 15:02:22+00:00): Siguiendo el tema de Belén, en el SII por ejemplo dice incorrectamente "Huelén", que puede ser una confusión o un nombre original que ya no se usa. También hay otros fundos que en el sii aparecen como "reserva" de haciendas más grandes (post reforma) o simplemente letras sin sentido.
buy_osmand (2025-08-20 05:52:43+00:00): I, buy_osmand am going to sign this off as ground_survey takes precedence. I shall mention it will be great to have this additionally looked by tkotnala_lyft, a corporate mapper for any objections (if any) 

Disclaimer: I do not currently own a vehicle for travel. 😢

Peace,
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170644109
Jeff Ferrari (2025-08-20 12:07:05+00:00): Thanks buy_osmand.

I might add: I made this edit due to the very high number of Lyft riders misrouting going to Marquis at Treetops… trying to help reduce driver frustration :)
buy_osmand (2025-08-20 04:12:50+00:00): I, buy_osmand, has read the wiki and stand by jtbaker on his actions taken for the improvement of his local community.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway#Common_values

 AlhamdullilahirRabil'aalaameen❗❕
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170644162
jptolosa (2025-08-19 01:39:51+00:00): Hola, este lugar corresponde a un fundo, no a un caserío (hamlet)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170644413
James2813 (2025-08-19 03:45:14+00:00): Hola, jptolosa. Gracias por la aclaración. He visto otros fundos marcados como 'hamlet'. ¿Cuál es la forma estándar de marcarlos en Chile?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170644413
felipeeugenio (2025-08-19 12:15:57+00:00): Hola James.
Hay varios errores en OSM y los estamos corrigiendo, Pero =farm es la etiqueta correcta.
saludos
andrewth1 (2025-08-21 00:18:25+00:00): Thank you for adding the new PG County bus routes! Your work looks pretty good so far, but let me know if you need any help.
Warin61 (2025-08-20 00:16:51+00:00): Hi,
The school does not only occupy the buildings but also the grounds. The school boundary can be found in the DCS Base Map. I have made the change.
user_5359 (2025-08-19 08:08:03+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Thanks for your addition!
You can also add the gate (as a node on the street) with the key barrier. For Details see https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:barrier
Alliegaytor (2025-08-19 05:53:35+00:00): Could you fix the wikipedia tags for those relations? It should be *language*:*page title* rather than a URL.

E.g. wikipedia=en:Williamstown line rather than wikipedia=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Williamstown_line
LachlanTansey2009 (2025-08-20 00:12:48+00:00): Cheers for pointing this out to me. I will fix this and other relations with this issue. Thanks again, Lachlan