piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
silversurfer83 (2025-02-26 08:04:55+00:00): Hello there :)

thank you for your work at OSM.

I'd like to point out a couple of things:

- please do not edit things all across the globe in one changeset. This makes qualitly assurance work a bit harder for people trying to cover "their turf" [1]

- as other people already have pointed out: Please use better changeset comments [2]

- you seem to have an interest in emergency phones which you add based on Wikimedia Commons pictures. Please add a "check_date=YYYY-MM-DD" to each phone you map like that, setting the date to the date the image was taken. Please don't add things based on 6 year old images without adding that information directly to the OSM-object.
It would be nice of you to revisit all of your added objects that are based on images not taken by yourself and add proper check_date tags.

happy mapping

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

[2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
pahlavi_temecula (2025-03-08 03:26:06+00:00): Hello, I  apologize for the giant “around the world” changesets. I like to map stuff like drinking fountains, emergency phones, pay phones, restrooms, and other basic amenities that larger services like apple and google don’t get, as I hope one day small stuff like drinking fountains and restrooms get imported into the larger map datasets.
pahlavi_temecula (2025-03-08 03:31:22+00:00): I just wanted to add some low-hanging missing amenities from around the world.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-02 10:27:19+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12620041768/history has fixme:type = school that was added in this edit
Would it be amenity=school ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dschool )
Something else?
TrickyFoxy (2025-02-26 10:33:58+00:00): 👋 Здесь явно нет водопада. Что вы хотели добавить?
NeisRevert (2025-02-26 06:54:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully by https://osm.org/changeset/162958739 where the changeset comment is: Remove test data
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-26 08:16:50+00:00): ok
NeisBot (2025-02-26 17:01:04+00:00): Hello, thank you for your contribution.

I noticed that some of the tags and descriptions you've used appear to be related to #SEO #spam. I recommend reading the following page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Spam

Could you please confirm if your map edits here were intentional?

#MapWithoutSpam #TagSmartNotSpam
pitscheplatsch (2025-03-13 13:14:34+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/163011785
oruk09 (2025-12-16 13:09:10+00:00): 순환로 부분은 잘못된 편집입니다 highway=service를 넣어야합니다
이환홍 (2025-12-16 15:53:25+00:00): 이유를 물어봐도 될까요??
oruk09 (2025-12-16 16:02:46+00:00): highway = service는 건물이나 산업시설등을 이어주는 역할로 그나마 적절한 선택지입니다 다른 국가에서도 사용중입니다 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ko:Tag:highway=service 
highway = secondary는 번역상으로 2차 라고 되어있는건 차선이 2차가 아닌 2번째로 중요한 도로로 지역과 지역이 이어지는 도로입니다 한국 기준 지방도 정도로 해석하고 있습니다 이환홍님이 편집한 곳은 대학부지내의 가상 도심으로 실제 도심이 아니므로 이 태그는 옳바르지 못합니다 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ko:Tag:highway=secondary 자세한건 OSM KR 탤래그램에 오셔서 물어봐주세요
이환홍 (2025-12-17 03:04:16+00:00): 감사합니다.
NeisRevert (2025-02-26 07:03:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully by https://osm.org/changeset/162958931 where the changeset comment is: 
Remove test data
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-26 08:16:53+00:00): ok
streckenkundler (2026-02-27 20:56:21+00:00): Du hast mit dieser Serie an deinen "Bearbeitungen" extremst viel Schaden angerichtet... durch das Entfernen von boundary=administrative an ways hast du dem geneigten Nutzer die Möglichkeit genommen, way strukturiert zu  ersetzen... Filtermöglichkeiten fehlen nun! So besteht nun die extrem große Gefahr ungetagte ways zu hinterlassen...

..sehr verärgerte Grüße...
geozeisig (2026-02-28 07:17:20+00:00): Hallo Sven,

boundary=administrative an ways sind überflüssig, es wird an die Relation geschrieben. Ich habe es seinerzeit auch benutzt um zu wissen welche Gemeinde ich schon bezüglich der Adressen bearbeitet hatte. Noch kann ich es mir nicht vorstellen, wozu du sie jetzt brauchst.

Ich bitte um Entschuldigung, wenn ich dir unnötige Arbeit gemacht habe.

Viele Grüße

Dieter
streckenkundler (2026-02-28 11:01:47+00:00): Nein, sind sie nicht! Beim Bearbeiten von Grenzen und in Vorbereitung/Nachbereitung von Ersetzen von Geometrien ist das zwingend erforderlich zum einen wegen Filtermöglichkeit und um nach der Bearbeitung kein taglose Linien zu hinterlassen die man anderenfalls mühsam suchen muß... Sven
NeisRevert (2025-02-26 07:49:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/162960314 where the changeset comment is: 
Remove my test data
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-26 08:16:55+00:00): ok
Tinetto (2025-04-24 11:09:50+00:00): Hello Awania Morish, thank You for your contribution. Make sure to solve validation errors and connect all elements while task closure. I have fixed validation error between building crossing building node 12652223150 and created connectivity for a way 1363033047. Happy Mapping!
NeisRevert (2025-02-26 07:54:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/162960563 where the changeset comment is: 
Remove my test data - Final test
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-26 08:16:58+00:00): ok
s777n (2025-02-26 16:01:38+00:00): Откатил. Непохоже на правду и не совпадает с ЕГРН.
NeisRevert (2025-02-26 08:01:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/162960772 where the changeset comment is: 
Remove my test data
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-26 08:17:01+00:00): ok
NeisRevert (2025-03-03 06:56:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/163147762 where the changeset comment is: 
Remove my test data
NeisBot (2025-02-26 17:01:58+00:00): Hi Beccabd, and thank you for your contributions to the OSM project!

I've noticed that over the past few hours, you've made several changesets with comments that might be unclear, difficult to understand, or consistently repetitive.

For collaboration within the OSM community, it’s helpful to provide comments that explain the changes you’ve made. This helps others follow your work more easily. You can find some useful tips for writing clear and effective changeset comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Thanks for your attention to this.

PS: I’ve also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#ClearComments
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-27 19:43:38+00:00): Wow, what a creative use of hashtags! 

I almost thought I was reading a social media post instead of an OSM changeset comment. 

If only there were a way to explain what exactly was mapped or edited—imagine how much easier it would be for others to follow along. 

But hey, who needs clarity when you can have an alphabet soup of project codes, right?
</ironic>

#hotosm
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-28 14:24:31+00:00): I must now apologize retrospectively for my previous comment. It was sent too quickly by me out of emotion, without taking enough time to think it over. I would be glad if you continued to actively contribute to the OSM project. 

#HappyMapping
Vinber-Pro (2025-02-26 09:55:13+00:00): Même retour que sur la première :)

et là tu as du modifier 2 points éloignés de Fianarantsoa, cela fait une grande surface :)

à plus
bxl-forever (2025-02-28 16:11:25+00:00): Pour votre info :

Tommy3009 a de nouveau cassé toutes les relations de bus.  Cet edit a demandé une grande réparation.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162993031
NeisBot (2025-02-26 17:01:05+00:00): Hello, thank you for your contribution.

I noticed that some of the tags and descriptions you've used appear to be related to #SEO #spam. I recommend reading the following page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Spam

Could you please confirm if your map edits here were intentional?

#MapWithoutSpam #TagSmartNotSpam
pitscheplatsch (2025-03-13 13:13:02+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/163570094
NeisBot (2025-02-26 17:01:06+00:00): Hello, thank you for your contribution.

I noticed that some of the tags and descriptions you've used appear to be related to #SEO #spam. I recommend reading the following page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Spam

Could you please confirm if your map edits here were intentional?

#MapWithoutSpam #TagSmartNotSpam
pitscheplatsch (2025-03-13 13:11:51+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/163570046
silversurfer83 (2025-02-26 08:42:38+00:00): Moin :)

Ist das (ehem.?) Sägewerk noch unter dem Namen bekannt? Wären lifecycle prefixes vielleicht angebracht? Sowas wie "was:name=" oder "old_name=" und wenn dort aktuell kein Geschäftsbetrieb stattfindet auch ein "disused:" vor das "craft=sawmill"

Grüße aus dem Waldeckischen
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162961231
sauerland-radfahrer (2025-02-26 09:56:50+00:00): Hallo,

habe disused: vorangestellt.

Vieler Grüße
MarinoBM (2025-02-28 19:33:54+00:00):  Hola Ars_nomen: los cementerios de Valladolid son cementerios municipales sin adscripción religiosa, tal como recoge la ley de cementerios.

https://www.boe.es/diario_boe/txt.php?id=BOE-A-1978-27612
Repongo el etiquetado.
jeslop (2025-03-04 22:08:27+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163221474
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-17 00:42:50+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165050151
michael_ua (2025-02-26 18:49:45+00:00): This changeset was reverted due to vandalism.

radajek02, please follow the street naming conventions https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:%D0%90%D0%B4%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%B8#%D0%92%D0%B8%D0%B7%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%87%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8F_%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BA%D0%B2%D1%96%D0%B7%D0%B8%D1%82%D1%83_%D0%B0%D0%B4%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%B8_%C2%AB%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0_%D0%B2%D1%83%D0%BB%D0%B8%D1%86%D1%96%C2%BB

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162984508
mcliquid (2025-02-26 14:50:51+00:00): Hallo, was ist hier an "building=house" falsch gewesen?
Crogan (2025-02-28 07:38:08+00:00): Добрый день! Что это за здания на территории рынка с номерами 13в и13Б? На спутниковом снимке там расположены торговые павильоны. Эти здания отрисованы слишком большими, фактически превышают площадь занимаемую павильонами. Угловая точка одного из зданий соеденяется с пешеходной дорожкой и это считается ошибкой, нужно отделять линии таких объектов друг от друга. Спутниковые снимки тоже советую выбирать не BING (безнадёжно устарели), а ESRI обычные (НЕ Clarity) - они наиболее актуальны из доступных.
s777n (2025-02-26 09:19:44+00:00): Здравствуйте. Имя предназначено для собственных имен. Например "Александровский дворец" или "Магнит". А вот местные названия, номера домов или типы объектов например "Продуктовый" или "Сооружение" добавлять не нужно. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Названия
d3mol3k (2025-02-26 18:47:44+00:00): Tomek zdjąłeś access=no z łącznika pomiedzy jezdniami Południowej. Tam nie można skrecać jadac od ronda Uniwersyteckiego ani od ronda Hakena wzdłóż wschodniej nitki przy jej lewej krawędzi w jezdni są zamontowane te niskie pseudo krawężniki a cała powierzchnia tego łącznika jest obecnie martwtm polem. Zmiany nastąpiły po oddaniu do użytku wybudowanego wjazdu w ulicę Gorzowską do salonu Porsche. Ostatnie kadry w mapilary z wrzesnia są już dawno nie aktualne. Postaram się je uaktualnić ostatnio tam zrobiłem aktualizację ale nie zauważyłem zapewne że kliknąłem w presecie nie tą ikonkę restrykcji.
Tomek | Yanosik (2025-02-27 06:40:29+00:00): Ok jasna sprawa, dzięki za wyjaśnienie. Już przywracam access=no w takim razie.
d3mol3k (2025-02-27 16:42:27+00:00): Dzięki 👍
jeslop (2025-03-04 22:08:28+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163221474
mueschel (2025-02-27 09:37:48+00:00): Hi,
welcome to OSM!

I see that you added a couple of 'recycling' tags. In OSM we have to use a well-defined set of tags to allow all the software tools to understand the data and e.g. show it on maps.

Could you have a look to the wiki and change the tags to those listed there?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Drecycling
Aneta Zwierzynová (2025-02-27 10:52:40+00:00): Dobrý den, 
změnila jsem značky na vámí uvedené ve https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/. Akorát některé se mi nepřepsaly do češtiny a zůstaly v angličtine. Např. metal - je to chyba?
mueschel (2025-02-27 11:06:42+00:00): The tags you added are perfectly fine. In the database itself, it's always the English name that is stored. The editor software translates them for your convenience. If something is missing in the translation table, it will show the English original. This will happen quite often with rarer tags, because translations are often not complete (yet).
Aneta Zwierzynová (2025-02-27 11:10:22+00:00): Děkuji za vysvětlení a přeji hezký den.
rempshaener (2025-02-26 19:36:02+00:00): Hallo,

du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.

Der Name klingt eher nach einer Beschreibung als nach einer offiziellen Bezeichnung. D. h. eventuell passt das besser in „description“, aber auch dafür ist die Beschreibung eigentlich zu allgemein gehalten. Heißt: eher nicht erfassen.

Was auch noch von Interesse wäre: wie sind die Wege beschildert?

Ein wirklich reiner Radweg (ohne Fußgänger) mit Verkehrszeichen 237 (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Zeichen_237_-_Sonderweg_Radfahrer,_StVO_1992.svg) wäre dann
highway=cycleway
bicycle=designated

Für den Fall, dass auch Fußgänger zugelassen sind (z.B. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Zeichen_240_-_Gemeinsamer_Fu%C3%9F-_und_Radweg,_StVO_1992.svg), wäre
highway=path
bicycle=designated
foot=designated
segregated=no

einschlägig.

Bei Fragen bitte melden.
Viele Grüße
NeisBot (2025-02-26 17:01:07+00:00): Hello, thank you for your contribution.

I noticed that some of the tags and descriptions you've used appear to be related to #SEO #spam. I recommend reading the following page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Spam

Could you please confirm if your map edits here were intentional?

#MapWithoutSpam #TagSmartNotSpam
pitscheplatsch (2025-03-13 13:02:45+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/163569620
pitscheplatsch (2025-03-13 13:10:34+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/163569976
dzamper (2025-02-26 11:57:50+00:00): Co dokładnie oznacza znacznik `ref:smfbno`?
Baloo Uriza (2025-02-26 14:16:33+00:00): If you need branch information displayed on your rendering, change your renderer, not the map.  Branch information does not belong in the name tag, only the name does.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162973876
NeisBot (2025-02-26 17:01:08+00:00): Hello, thank you for your contribution.

I noticed that some of the tags and descriptions you've used appear to be related to #SEO #spam. I recommend reading the following page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Spam

Could you please confirm if your map edits here were intentional?

#MapWithoutSpam #TagSmartNotSpam
pitscheplatsch (2025-03-13 12:58:06+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/163079151
L29Ah (2025-02-26 12:54:58+00:00): Там точно теперь дорога сквозь дома проходит?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162964979
Batiskaf_stv (2025-02-26 13:37:16+00:00): Дорога по факту проложена, она прямая на просвет, уже даже заасфальтирована. Я посчитал важным нанести ее на карту.
Какие дома снесены из дома, глядя на карту не понятно, я не стал с ними заморачиваться. Сейчас попробую исправить.
caseywittmier (2025-02-26 17:32:20+00:00): This property has not been a state park since 2017. The website you added is actually for a similarly named state park about 40 miles away. I have made corrections in 162981466.
TomM4 (2025-02-27 19:32:08+00:00): Damn it. Sorry about that. I will try to be more careful.
caseywittmier (2025-02-27 20:14:06+00:00): It happens. Had you not made that edit, I probably wouldn't have noticed that the park was still on the map in the first place. That's one benefit of the collaborative nature of OSM.
eggie (2025-02-26 12:33:52+00:00): Dag Geneviève S

Het is gebruikelijk om de adresnode te gebruiken om info aan toe te voegen. 
Dus eigenlijk geen adressen toevoegen aan de gebouwomtrek. Er is een adresnode.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-02-26 12:36:12+00:00): Info overgezet naar adresnode
eggie (2025-02-26 21:45:11+00:00): Nou... Renderen doet die tag niet op een adresnode. Ik heb de tagging teruggezet naar de gebouwomtrek.

Groet
eggie
archie (2025-02-26 10:48:15+00:00): Hej, jag har reverterat denna cs och lagt till life-cycle-prefix istället, så som vi brukar göra med företeelser som alltjämt syns på satellitbilderna.
eggie (2025-02-26 11:10:15+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
NeisBot (2025-02-26 17:01:09+00:00): Hello, thank you for your contribution.

I noticed that some of the tags and descriptions you've used appear to be related to #SEO #spam. I recommend reading the following page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Spam

Could you please confirm if your map edits here were intentional?

#MapWithoutSpam #TagSmartNotSpam
mindblaster6 (2025-02-26 21:57:33+00:00): I can confirm. These changes are correct and were intentional. 
Thanks for checking.
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-28 14:43:29+00:00): Thank you very much for your reply.

#HappyMapping
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-03-23 10:16:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163979213 where the changeset comment is: Following on from https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163963906 , and see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/about-mapping-features-with-computer-vision/127790 - reverting some 'AI detected swimming pools', some of dubious quality.
pavvv (2025-02-26 14:59:20+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1312815548
Tej ścieżki nic nie oddziela fizycznie od drogi, więc nie mapujemy jej osobną linią, tylko dodajemy tag sidewalk=left albo sidewalk:left=yes do jezdni.
eggie (2025-02-26 11:12:24+00:00): Dag GemBer,

De rest van de adresgegevens ook verwijderd.
Er is een adresnode.
MVG
eggie
GemBer (2025-02-26 12:23:06+00:00): Hallo Eggie,
Dank je. Ik had ze zien staan, maar laten staan. Weg is mooier inderdaad.

GemBer
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-03-23 10:16:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163979213 where the changeset comment is: Following on from https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163963906 , and see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/about-mapping-features-with-computer-vision/127790 - reverting some 'AI detected swimming pools', some of dubious quality.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-03-23 10:16:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163979213 where the changeset comment is: Following on from https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163963906 , and see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/about-mapping-features-with-computer-vision/127790 - reverting some 'AI detected swimming pools', some of dubious quality.
AndyB_66 (2025-02-26 11:25:48+00:00): Przekładka dopiero od jutra - pospieszyłeś się. Póki co - wycofuję.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162967467
AndyB_66 (2025-02-26 11:27:38+00:00): Przekładka dopiero od jutra - pospieszyłeś się. Póki co - wycofuję.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162967521
bxl-forever (2025-02-26 11:32:51+00:00): Hello, and welcome to OSM

A 2.5 m² wood is very unlikely.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1363061451

What is this changeset about?

If this is a "test", please undo all your edits immediately.  No testing in the production database, please.
fs_LT (2025-03-24 12:24:22+00:00): Hallo WalterAHSchwarz, bitte achte bei den traffic sein auf das korrekte Tagging. Bitte nicht als "traffic_sign" in den Value sondern nur als key.
pitscheplatsch (2025-03-13 12:56:09+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/163569333
puma515 (2025-02-27 11:22:20+00:00): Hallo und Willkomen bei OpenStreetMap

Danke fürs verbessern der Gebäude.
Sieht soweit gut aus nur sind mir 
2 kleine fehler aufgefallen. Welche ich auch schon behoben habe.  

Beim anpassen der Gebäudefläche hast du irgentwie ein type=multipolygon draus gemacht Das wird eigentlich nur bei Gebäude die z.b. ein Innenhof haben und dann aus Fläche innen und aussen bestehen genutzt. 

Der Gebäudetyp war nun auch nicht mehr vorhanden daher habe ich das so wie zuvor wieder als freistehendes Einfamilienhaus angepasst.
Sollte das ein andrer Gebäudetyp sein gerne anpassen. 

Schön gruß 
puma515
NorthCrab_upload (2025-02-26 11:30:57+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10622208902

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-28 20:45:25+00:00): Hi revolt88, welcome to OSM.

May we know the reason behind deleting some mapped ways?

Thanks.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-08 01:53:48+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164657651
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-18 03:06:41+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165094267
chris66 (2025-07-06 08:15:34+00:00): Hi,
weisst Du noch, wieso Du hier vehicle=privat gesetzt hast? Angeblich (laut Note) sind Fussgänger auch nicht erlaubt.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/32073470/history

Grüße
Chris
nurdafur (2025-07-06 08:37:17+00:00): Hi Chris
Wahrscheinlich habe ich beim Vorbeidüsen mit dem Fahrrad ein Fahrberbotsschild gesehen.
Falls da noch mehr Text war, habe ich den nicht beachtet. Ich habe mich hauptsächlich auf den Verlauf der Sandsteinroute konzentriert.
Liebe Grüße
Urs
eggie (2025-02-26 12:30:31+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Volgens mij kun je de eenheid in tijd nog aangeven Kijk even hier. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:duration
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-02-26 14:39:48+00:00): The duration does not include any possibly required waiting time.

Kijk je nog even?

Mvg

eggie
TCS1978 (2025-02-26 14:43:10+00:00): Ik heb denk ik nu nog een wijziging gedaan in plaats van deze te corrigeren...
Ik duik er even in wat ik verkeerd doe.
eggie (2025-02-26 14:46:13+00:00): Oke.. up to you.. bij zulke wijzigingen kijk ik ook altijd nog in de wiki.
Mapse..
eggie
TCS1978 (2025-02-26 14:52:43+00:00): Ik heb wat onderschat hoeveel informatie er achter zit. Als ik nu kijk lijkt het er wel goed in te staan (althans, wat de bedoeling is), dus ik zal er verder vanaf blijven. Dank voor je hulp!
eggie (2025-02-26 15:02:04+00:00): Alle begin is moeilijk... Laat je niet ontmoedigen door een validator :)
hauke-stieler (2025-03-23 15:36:45+00:00): Hi simongr,

in OSM, housenumbers are not attached to the streets or paths, but to buildings or entrances. Also this path has no official name (i.e. there is no name-sign in reality). I changed the way-tagging here accordingly. By the way, the buildings here are normal buildings, both in OSM and in reality. No madman was involved here.

cheers
Hauke
Tomas09 (2026-04-19 20:39:00+00:00): Ik zie altijd alleen maar de engelse termen. Zeker weten dat dit zo is?
onovy (2025-04-01 18:03:43+00:00): Ahoj,

prosím o dodržování dokumentace. Transformátor na sloupu se značí jako power=pole+transformer=*.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Elektrick%C3%A1_veden%C3%AD#Sloupy

Děkuji.
pyram (2025-05-25 13:41:10+00:00): Hi Hypano,
Due hast bayernweit diverse Adressen erfasst. Grundsätzlich ist das ja schön, aber woher stammt denn zum Beispiel dieses Gebäude samt Adresse: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1363072677
Es ist auf keinem zulässigen Luftbild zu sehen.
Eine Quellenangabe wäre schon schön ;-)

Gruß
pyram