piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
World_Winner (2026-07-10 07:24:15+00:00): Hello kre777, 
Thank you for the clarification and for taking the time to explain the distinction. I understand your point. I seem to have applied the separate carriageway principle more broadly than intended.

Since there have been other edits at the location since this changeset, a revert would most probably introduce data conflicts, and complicate things. I believe a manual fix at this point would be the sensible solution anyway. 

Thank you again for your message and kind feedback.
scai (2026-06-22 11:52:01+00:00): Hi CIMFX37CW,
an diesem Ort war die neue Toilette bereits eingetragen, du hast eine Dopplung erzeugt. Diese wurde mittlerweile bereinigt.

Und bitte keine Trivialnamen für solche POIs geben. Eine Toilette hat nicht den offiziellen Namen "Toilette" sondern einfach gar keinen Namen :)

Grüße
Alex
bxl-forever (2026-06-19 12:11:45+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue sur OSM.

Merci d’avoir signalé l'école manquante.

Pour ajouter une école sur la carte, il faut indiquer un tag précis : amenity=school.  Sinon, le moteur de carte ne verra pas que c'est une école.  Ajouter juste un nom sur le bâtiment ne fonctionne pas.

Nous avons refait votre édition, voici le point : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13951936996

Nous avons aussi des codes spécialisés pour filtrer les écoles par langue.  Je peux les ajouter mais j'ai besoin d'une info : quelles sont les langues où sont donnés les cours ?

Merci.
NieWnen (2026-06-19 12:00:02+00:00): That's a wrong assumption. We don't split ways "for graphs".

The 3rd party software should handle it without changing OSM data.

Changeset reverted.
0235 (2026-06-21 12:08:43+00:00): Hello Ceryslovell, what is your source for these speed limit changes, as this road is still 30MPH, not 40MPH?

Many thanks,
Richard :)
ednzxt (2026-06-19 14:13:35+00:00): Добрый день. Какой источник адресной информации?
Описательные названия объектам не присваиваются (Красная будка)!
Frans S (2026-06-23 12:16:47+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
You did not adjust the offset which was required.
Please square also your rectangular buildings.
Best regards
mapeditor11 (2026-06-19 16:40:15+00:00): This was not ai detected, it's lidar.
ednzxt (2026-06-19 13:15:29+00:00): Добрый день. Какой источник данных? В большей степени интересуют неймы.
ednzxt (2026-06-19 14:38:38+00:00): Вы неверно указали мост верните, пожалуйста, на место https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/562730025
yelisey90 (2026-06-19 17:21:50+00:00): Now the road crosses the building, that's not right. Please fix that
aibek55 (2026-06-22 09:20:36+00:00): Спасибо что заметили, все исправил!
ednzxt (2026-06-19 14:04:03+00:00): Добрый день. Для тегирования устаревших и альтернативных названий есть соответствующие теги old_name, alt_name. Считаю Ваши изменения в части переименования остановок необоснованными и неверными. Ознакомьтесь с правилами наименования на Wiki, восстановите прежние названия и пропишите дополнительные теги name. В проитвном случае ваши правки придется отменить. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:name
Marvk (2026-06-25 18:15:58+00:00): Relations were broken here too. Also, cycleway and footway tags are not correct now.
TheSwavu (2026-06-19 22:42:23+00:00): Changeset reverted as POI is in the wrong location by about 15,000 km.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184334609
eggie (2026-06-19 13:38:51+00:00): Boi.. Zo te zien heb je de landuse grass verwijderd en vervangen door een functie.
Beter is het om een losse deken met de parknaam over de landuse heen te leggen.
..leisure park is een transparant die over bos hras en water heen ligt.
eggie
NieWnen (2026-06-21 22:36:45+00:00): Cześć,
w tej zmianie linia taka jak ta ma nieprawidłowe tagowanie:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1530830572

Zachęcam do poprawy zgodnie z wiki:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Rowery#Drogi_dla_pieszych_i_rower%C3%B3w

jeśli jest to CPR, to zmiana na highway=path, a jeśli nie to warto usunąć tagi bicycle/foot.

Jako, że jest to edycja wykonywana przez edytor iD to dodam tylko, że zawsze warto patrzeć w tagi.
irik (2026-06-21 23:01:56+00:00): Siemka, niestety ten fragment trasy poprawiałem na podstawie mapy gminy i nie wiem jak tam wygląda sytuacja w terenie, czy to CPR, czy chodnik. :/
dzamper (2026-06-25 10:39:10+00:00): A jaka to dokładnie „mapa gminy Pawłowice”? Czy na pewno ma licencję pozwalającą na kopiowanie jej do OSM?
Dimitar155 (2026-06-20 20:35:55+00:00): Върнах възела, понеже върху него има и други полезни данни. Ще прехвърля името от сградата върху възела.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184367754
dieterdreist (2026-06-22 10:40:28+00:00): I believe something went wrong here, you are changing the border and now for example this mountain, which is on the border according to wikipedia, is entirely in Switzerland: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/307219462
similar, this node is not on the border any more: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/184314894
There are more peaks with the same problem.
dieterdreist (2026-06-22 10:42:33+00:00): Sorry, I meant to write this peak: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/307218738
SimonPoole (2026-06-22 14:20:45+00:00): See https://map.geo.admin.ch/#/map?lang=de&center=2642601.5,1093975.8&z=13&topic=ech&layers=ch.swisstopo.swissboundaries3d-gemeinde-flaeche.fill@year=2026@features=6288;ch.swisstopo.hoheitsgrenzpunkte-landesvermessung&bgLayer=ch.swisstopo.pixelkarte-farbe&featureInfo=default&catalogNodes=ech,457,510

The nearest border point is at (11818) is located at 45.9959316, 7.9890881 (a bolt). The peak is at 45.995930, 7.989075 a meter away. 

And yes expecting your complaint I looked at every single one, checked border points, position of the peak etc. (leaving out the arguments on what being "on the border" even means topologically).
dieterdreist (2026-06-22 16:09:24+00:00): thank you for being diligent. :)
dknelson9876 (2026-06-20 02:31:00+00:00): Hi viktoryia, please do not use TIGER as a source for road names in Utah. TIGER did a horrible job of handling our multiple street names and the local community has put in a lot of effort to clean up the mess. Specifically in this case, note that the full street name "West 7800 South" was already captured in name:full=* according to osm.wiki/Utah/Naming_Conventions.
viktoryia fedarava (2026-06-23 07:13:21+00:00): Hello, dknelson9876! Thanks for your comment and the feedback.  I will take this into account when working on similar cases in the future.
Best regards, viktoryia fedarava.
NieWnen (2026-06-19 13:17:37+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184264793
FajrAl (2026-06-20 02:36:17+00:00): dua arah; jalan sebelah barat ditutup
qgmzmy (2026-06-22 04:04:01+00:00): 请不要将未开通的车站添加到线路关系。

Please do not add unopened stations to the route relation.
JimmyWOO (2026-07-03 03:12:11+00:00): Foshan Railway Station have been opened since 1 July 2026 (including High Speed Railway (Guangzhou - Zhanjiang) Station and Metro Station).

自2026年7月1日起，佛山站（含广湛高铁站与地铁站）已正式开通启运。
Martinligabue (2026-06-20 10:14:28+00:00): ciao, ti è finito un nodo in un marciapiede dell'altra strada, risolto io

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184347064
Taya_S (2026-06-20 10:16:02+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap

I see you're interested in adding MTB tracks in this area. If you are interested in really mapping these trails in as much detail as possible, then you might want to read the wiki page on MTB tagging. It contains a lot of very useful additional information:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mountain_biking

Best regards,
Taya Snijder
caprieldeluca (2026-06-19 18:12:36+00:00): Hola. Revisé los cambios, gracias por los agregados!
Corregí la ubicación de los nodos de interpolación. No deberían quedar tan cerca de las calles ni de las esquinas. 
Cualquier duda nos podés contactar en el grupo de Telegram de la comunidad OSM Argentina. https://t.me/osm_ar
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184317512
Marvk (2026-06-25 17:11:12+00:00): 1. This edit also broke about a dozen relations, 2 of which are still broken:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/76831
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8387223

2. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24336297 is oneway=yes in the wrong direction, 

3. Please review the turning restrictions.

4. Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/42948340 really not connected to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24336297? Are you forced to make a right turn coming from the north?

5. Please also review the tags, particularly cycleway:*, sidewalk:*, parking:*.
Till_btn (2026-06-20 09:16:40+00:00): Hi,
there are several problems with your edits on this junction:
- some turning restrictions are broken, i.e. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1916157 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1460113
- you deleted most of the lane information
- cycleway-Tags are now missing or wrong

Please fix those errors or revert the whole changeset
Gorger (2026-06-25 16:15:33+00:00): Hi Till_btn, thank you for notifying me and bringing this to my attention. I missed to perform a full self-QC before uploading my changes. I have made the corrections based on your feedback, and I’ll ensure more thorough self-QC in the future before uploading my changes.
eggie (2026-06-19 14:42:50+00:00): 👍
Lužicki Bieluch (2026-06-21 12:04:47+00:00): Dobrze, że Pan w porę poprawił "błąd" w swojej pracy, już myślałem nad wycofaniem (jeszcze chwilę wyświetlało, jakby droga była ukończona)
ColdWaterSeal (2026-06-23 21:06:40+00:00): Hello Manuel Florian! Thank you for your contributions to the map. I see that you have made some highway classification edits here (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184318643#map=11/47.5269/23.6805); changing highways to trunk, primary, and secondary. These classifications are usually reserved for roads that are part of the main national road network or roads that connect major or small cities and towns. These roads would be best classified as tertiary or below, please see the Ro:Map Features page for guidelines on highway classification in Romania - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ro:Map_Features#Drumuri I plan to return these highways to their previous classifications. Thank you and let me know if you have any questions!
Jan Olieslagers (2026-06-26 08:09:41+00:00): It seems to me that this changeset does not correspond to reality... Failing response from the author, I vote for revering it completely.
Buraddo (2026-07-09 15:51:31+00:00): Changeset reverted in #185417204
Jan Olieslagers (2026-07-09 16:05:15+00:00): Thank you, @Burrado!
evgenykatyshev (2026-06-19 19:01:00+00:00): Was adding of the building based on something else than Esri Imagery?
Ozon OSM5 (2026-06-20 19:55:00+00:00): Hi! No, it was only according to the Esri Imagery. Why?
Senihtu (2026-06-20 04:41:40+00:00): Hi!
Kannst Du hier noch mal nacharbeiten?
Du hast 6 Buslinienrelationen unterbrochen!
Gruß
Senihtu
Geocrest (2026-06-22 13:46:27+00:00): Hi Senihtu, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you.
Geocrest (2026-06-25 16:19:47+00:00): Hi Senihtu, thank you for your kind warning and bringing the issues to my attention. I’ll address the broken routes and ensure to be more diligent on quality checks before uploading my edits.
eggie (2026-06-19 15:00:27+00:00): Dag Thomas..
Beek staat al als node in een relatie op de kaart.
Nu is het dubbel.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1514978#map=12/50.9346/5.8070

Je dorp kan weer weg.
Mvg
eggie
Thomasje (2026-06-19 15:37:55+00:00): Hi eggie

Dat is een andere plaats met dezelfde naam :) (limburg ipv montferland, gelderland)

De adressen in Beek montferland hadden het naastgelegen Loerbeek fout in het adres staan (omdat Beek alleen een relatie en geen node had denk ik??) en dit lijkt nu gefixt te zijn.

Ik heb dezelfde structuur als Loerbeek gekopieerd met een relatie en een node.
eggie (2026-06-19 15:42:24+00:00): Ahh.. oke.. 
Zit zelf alleen op mn mobiel te screenen.., maar dan heb ik geen overzicht.. vandaar.
Te warm om achter een computer te kruipen.

Mapse,
eggie (2026-06-19 19:50:24+00:00): Thomas.. Toch klopt je wijziging niet.
De placenode van Beek ligt al  op de kruising bij de begraafplaats.
Het heeft even niet met dat andere Beek van doen.
Ik draai de wijziging weer even terug. Een relatie ontbreekt hier overigens.
Je edits https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=184319501#22/51.90673/6.18815

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-06-19 19:52:06+00:00): reverted by changeset #184330380

Check even die placenode in het centrum.
BCNorwich (2026-06-19 17:03:25+00:00): Moved the POI to the building number 59 as per the POI address. If this is an online-only business, (no public access to a shop) it shouldn't be tagged as a shop.
pereelmagne (2026-06-19 17:47:34+00:00): Right. The mark is for number 59. It is a “brick and mortar” shop.
BCNorwich (2026-06-19 18:17:18+00:00): OK, so now I've checked the postcode and see it's for a different Dartmouth Road, SE23 3HN. The POI at present is at NW2 4EP. Can you move it or do you need help?

Regards Bernard.
pereelmagne (2026-06-19 19:58:10+00:00): It’s the first time I add a place. The information comes from this link: https://the-stationer.co.uk/pages/shop-in-real-life which speaks of a real shop. The postal code is what I gave. I don’t know how to solve this.
BCNorwich (2026-06-20 05:09:01+00:00): OK, I've moved it to Dartmouth Road south of the river, here:- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/289446720#map=19/51.437117/-0.054304&layers=N

Regards Bernard.
felipeeugenio (2026-06-20 14:35:08+00:00): Hola. Por favor no pegar los bosques a los caminos. Terminan siempre un poco antes.
O se consideran continuos sobre caminos terciarios o menores, pero nunca pegados.

saludos
hauke-stieler (2026-06-19 14:58:23+00:00): Ups, zu schnell Upload gedrückt: "Wegegeometrien rund um Preystraße angepasst/korrigiert"
Senihtu (2026-06-20 04:45:29+00:00): Hi!
Ich habe die Fehler behoben.
Aber kannst Du demnächst bei solchen Bearbeitungen auf Buslinienrelationen achten?
Gruß
Senihtu
MountMapper (2026-06-25 16:36:20+00:00): Hi Senihtu, thank you for making the corrections. I’ll be more careful when my edits affect route relations in the future. Well noted.
mueschel (2026-06-28 17:30:14+00:00): Hi,
you added a strange 'CDD' tag to many places - what does it mean?
gabro00 (2026-06-19 15:45:56+00:00): Szia! A korlátozási kapcsolat maradt, töröltem a https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184322034 módosításcsomagban.
Lê Tuấn Minh (2026-06-19 16:05:52+00:00): Mình đang dùng thử StreetComplete nên có thể bị phát sinh đột biến số lượng changeset
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-06-19 17:53:10+00:00): And is there bridge or ford there? Because currently neither is mapped
grzegorz75jan (2026-06-19 18:09:35+00:00): Tam jest to co było tzn. w terenie bo z mapy znikł most (spadek po poprzednikach) który na 90% jest przepustem ale na "pocieszenie" zostało w drodze layer=1.
https://mapy.geoportal.gov.pl/imap/Imgp_2.html?locale=pl&gui=new&sessionID=CC5B47DE-0198-438E-8E24-CBC851D4D743

https://mapy.geoportal.gov.pl/imap/Imgp_2.html?locale=pl&gui=new&sessionID=369F53BD-F4C9-41FB-A07F-ADA9D4B2ADA2
d_berger (2026-06-20 17:13:13+00:00): We're not driving on the left side of the road. Don't do automated changes based on a ticket system without local knowledge. Thank you.

reverted with CS184360919
Pan_Nug (2026-06-25 16:29:14+00:00): Hi d_berger, thank you for your warning on the driving directions. I apologize for this oversight, and I appreciate the corrective efforts on reverting the changeset. However, other than the driving directions, I believe I had captured the geometries correctly. Would it be OK for you if I re-attemp the edit more carefully?
d_berger (2026-06-26 22:10:21+00:00): No. It's a current construction zone, and we have enough local mappers that will take care of it in time. Thank you, but corporate induced changes are not welcome in Switzerland. You prove changes on ground with photos. Thank you for your understanding.
osmviborg (2026-06-19 21:04:32+00:00): maxspeed:advisory=30
rab (2026-06-26 21:33:06+00:00): The turning lanes appear inconsistent.
Perhaps it would be better to remove the traffic island instead.
unenTT (2026-07-08 13:52:36+00:00): Hi rab, thank you for your feedback and clear explanations on what went wrong. We are looking at the issues to carry out the necessary fixes, also addressing the matter internally to make sure our organised editing team contributes to high-quality, accurate data to OpenStreetMap going forward.
MerlinPendragon (2026-06-19 17:01:51+00:00): The building that you removed here IS the new construction: https://fdc.osu.edu/MALC
FroschForscher (2026-06-20 15:11:36+00:00): Hi du hast hier 7 Relationen gelöscht und als die Änderung nur mit "Kerekturen" kommentiert. Ein bessere Änderungssatzkommentar wäre z.B. "Veraltete/Doppelte/... Wander/Radweg Relationen nach Überprüfung gelöscht", also die Angabe der Löschgründe.

FroschForscher
Comino (2026-06-20 06:59:17+00:00): Hi,

In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes".

Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag !
Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead.

For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Merchants#tagging-guidance
and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bitcoin

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
BTC Map
thatonedoge (2026-06-20 13:44:59+00:00): thanks for the tip!
Wereldkaart123 (2026-06-19 18:20:27+00:00): Since these are future playgrounds, I added the "proposed" aspect of these developments in the tagging. Any tips on how to tag properly (so it renders properly) are welcome
eggie (2026-06-20 07:30:57+00:00): Hoi..

Dat rendert allemaal.gewoon als een bestaande speeltuin.
Ik denk beter.
..leisure=proposed
..propose=playground

..net als bv..
..highway=proposed
..proposed=residential

Iets wat er niet is hoort niet te renderen.

Mvg,
eggie
Wereldkaart123 (2026-06-20 23:08:33+00:00): Heel erg bedankt, ik heb t aangepast
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-20 03:43:23+00:00): Reverted adding SEO POI with malformed tags and with a source of Google Maps

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184338304
alexey_zakharenkov (2026-06-20 20:51:37+00:00): Здравствуйте.

Скажите, пожалуйста, этот участок https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1529669472 отделён от основной дороги физическим разделителем? Если нет, не надо его рисовать отдельной линией.

Почему вы съездам с trunk  на secondary назначаете класс secondary? Ведь их важность в дорожной сети (по крайней мере в этом месте) - secondary. Вы же сами ссылаетесь на "Соглашение", где именно это и написано.
alexey_zakharenkov (2026-06-28 19:06:11+00:00): Ещё подскажите, пожалуйста, действительно ли тут есть полоса/дублёр, отделённая физически -https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1529669454? Если нет, эту линию надо удалить. То же в противоположном направлении.
Buraddo (2026-07-09 15:37:50+00:00): Changeset reverted in #185416338
Buraddo (2026-07-09 15:51:14+00:00): #185417204
rarad74 (2026-06-19 19:07:18+00:00): Bing Maps are the worst imagery set for Bucharest and oldest. Over 8 years. Mapbox is best centered/aligned. Esri Standard is the newest, but   abit missaligned.
netpeel (2026-06-20 08:39:18+00:00): Noted! I'll keep that in mind next time.
Glassman (2026-06-20 15:31:43+00:00): Looks like you accidentially added the node to the islands relations. I fixed that. Also, the opening hours tags wants 24hour times, no AM or PM. also fixed.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184325020
yelisey90 (2026-06-19 17:39:01+00:00): 😭
Chezfisto (2026-06-19 17:17:55+00:00): https://campfireak.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/23-Marketing-Camp-K-Map-Update_11in-x-8.5in@72dpi_Final-1_AJ.pdf
ceirios (2026-06-19 17:30:55+00:00): apologies for long box, I edited Kiribati relation - it's unavoidable.
literan (2026-06-20 09:37:25+00:00): не надо дублировать объекты. Откачу.
felipeeugenio (2026-06-20 14:25:31+00:00): Hola. las animitas puedes ser un =wayside_shrine o =wayside_cross. No son un memorial en OSM.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:historic%3Dwayside_shrine

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:historic%3Dwayside_cross

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184326215
Marvk (2026-06-25 17:01:03+00:00): Please also review this edit, issues were created similar to the ones in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184327215 that were since partly fixed by other users, but for example, you left all these relations disconnected: 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4163873
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2925485
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2973109
Yukiro (2026-06-21 06:51:35+00:00): Kościół do poprawki
Till_btn (2026-06-20 09:20:35+00:00): Hi,
there are several problems with your edits on this junction:
- some turning restrictions are broken, i.e. relation/1916157 and relation/1460113
- the lane information is now wrong on most of the streets
- cycleway-tags weren't updated
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1530893415 was split up without properly handling the connection point on the east side

Please fix those errors or revert the whole changeset
Geocrest (2026-06-22 13:49:05+00:00): Hi Till_btn, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you.
Geocrest (2026-06-25 16:25:09+00:00): Hi Till_btn, thank you for sharing the detailed review. I have made the corrections based on your observations. Please let me know if there are other things I should address in the data.
Jarek 🚲 (2026-06-19 18:19:32+00:00): Hello 6totheworld,

Please respond to my comment on your earlier edits https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184290446
literan (2026-07-08 12:44:09+00:00): приветствую. тут у человека вопросы)) https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5382589

на снимке действительно построенных зданий не видно. Возможно, ошибка с тегами?
leobass (2026-07-15 10:24:06+00:00): Конечно не видно, старт продаж то месяц назад начался, теги норм- одни строятся, другие в проекте
literan (2026-07-15 10:52:24+00:00): если зданий на местности нет, то должны быть теги не building=proposed (этот тег deprecated в вики), а proposed:building=apartments

исправлю
исправлю
literan (2026-07-15 10:52:54+00:00): это для проектируемых зданий
GerdP (2026-07-25 17:39:26+00:00): Moin!
Du hast hier zwei Radwegweiser nebeneinander positioniert:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6586815305
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6586815303
In mapillary sehe ich einen in der Nähe von https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6268449737
Die beiden haben ja unterschiedliche ref, müsste also vor Ort leicht zu erkennen sein, wo welcher hingehört.
Fraxi (2026-06-20 09:00:28+00:00): Имаш предвид 20-ти, не 26-ти?
Fraxi (2026-06-20 09:01:12+00:00): Или 16-ти...
rhhs (2026-06-20 09:03:46+00:00): I had a vision that next week it will be as smooth as last Thursday...
eggie (2026-06-19 19:43:51+00:00): Welkom bij OSM,

Dit wordt toch wel gezien als vernieling van de kaart. Wat is je bedoeling?
Wat bedoeld je met 'Yes'? 
Mocht je zo doorgaan dan wordt het  een account van korte duur.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-06-19 19:44:57+00:00): reverted by changeset #184330096
MassCartog (2026-06-21 16:13:36+00:00): Hi welcome to Open Street Map. Driveways are a valid feature to be added to the OSM database, Please do not remove them.
rempshaener (2026-06-20 18:33:17+00:00): Hallo,
folgende Anmerkungen:
- Du hast die Wege unter der Brücke mit dem Umriss der Brücke verbunden. Diese werden nicht mit der Brücke verbunden.
- Die Wege auf der Brücke (mit bridge=yes) sind nicht mit dem Umriss verbunden. Das müssen sie aber sein.
- Du hast den Umriss mit einer administrative-boundary verbunden. Und diese verschoben.
Auf Grund der Vielzahl der betroffenen Objekte würde ich einen Revert vorschlagen.
Viele Grüße
silly_goose (2026-06-20 19:45:20+00:00): Ich mach mal einen Revert und fang nochmal von vorne an.

Vielen Dank für deine Rückmeldung dazu! :)
rempshaener (2026-06-20 21:11:22+00:00): Viel Erfolg
VLD0251 (2026-06-21 13:11:05+00:00): The name ‘Municipal Park / حظيرة البلدية’ generally suggests a public park rather than a parking area
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1530900027
josm19902026 (2026-06-21 14:56:06+00:00): Thank you, and we learn from you.