piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2026-03-08 17:10:33+00:00): Hoi,

Wellicht heb je hier iets aan.
satfoto van eind febr
https://viewer.satellietdataportaal.nl/@51.86703,4.618217,18/?datastrip=20260225_SVNEO-04&sensorname=SuperView-NEO

Mapse,
eggie
TheIndra (2026-03-08 18:52:04+00:00): Hoi Eggie,
Bedankt voor de link, dat helpt enorm!
Met vriendelijke groet,
Indra
eggie (2026-03-08 18:59:44+00:00): Er zijn ook recentere luchtfoto's
Wanneer je PDOK actueel als achtergrond neemt scheelt het al weer en in JOSM kan ik ook koezen voor recentere luchtfoto's.
Esri World is meestal outdated. 
Die link van sat dataporrtaal zijn geen 'luchtfoto's', maar satellietopnames. Volgende week heb je al weer een nieuwe. Dus de link ergens opslaan is mijn advies.
MappingMore (2026-03-10 00:22:12+00:00): Revert of 179540892
Miranda Dickinson (2026-03-12 20:29:46+00:00): The geometry did not align with aerial imagery, so v2 was made to adjust for this
Miranda Dickinson (2026-03-12 20:29:58+00:00): The geometry did not align with aerial imagery, so v2 was made to adjust for this
ajmat (2026-03-10 03:51:00+00:00): Reverted in changeset id: 179612932
Miranda Dickinson (2026-03-13 00:34:34+00:00): Attributes of this road were updated
Miranda Dickinson (2026-03-13 00:33:54+00:00): The park name was not saved, so I added this attribute
Piagno (2026-03-08 17:19:15+00:00): I removed the construction on the electrification, as someone else changed the tracks to be completed
rik_ (2026-03-09 14:09:16+00:00): Aloha 👋

Habe das Changeset eben bemerkt und wundere mich über das neue Access-Tagging.

Du beziehst dich vermutlich auf die Schilder (eine Art VZ 250 mit Text „Privatstraße“ und noch eins mit „Kein Winterdienst“), die dort irgendjemand aufgestellt hat, die aber keinerlei rechtliche Relevanz haben dürften: Sie sind nicht im Katalog der StVO enthalten und dürften so keine Wirkung entfalten außer, dass sie halt dort herumstehen.

Es gibt Indizien dafür, dass die Straße auch als solche benutzt werden kann. Es stehen z. B. auf beiden Seiten (Egsdorf, Zesch am See) Ortsschilder, die auf den jeweils anderen Ort weisen (Beispiel: [^1]) und damit eine ganz normale Befahrbarkeit der Straße implizieren.

Auch gibt es rechts und links der Straße viele Waldwegschranken und -schilder. Das deutet ebenfalls darauf hin, dass es sich um eine normale Ortsverbindungsstraße handelt, auch wenn sie auf den ersten Blick nicht so aussehen mag. Davon gibt's aber jedenfalls unzählige in Brandenburg.

Eventuell liege ich mit meiner Einschätzung auch falsch? Wäre toll, wenn du etwas Licht ins Dunkel bringen könntest.

[^1]: https://www.mapillary.com/app/user/elgolfo?lat=52.129662365201&lng=13.582677848172011&z=19.449583431621186&pKey=1050771149062225&focus=photo&x=0.5095880800563191&y=0.44685368090370636&zoom=0
pwbriggs (2026-03-19 03:51:14+00:00): Hey, looks like you have 7 warnings flagged by the editor on this changeset (roads disconnected from the main road network, roads crossing each other and buildings). Please try to resolve those before uploading, unless the warnings are inaccurate. I'll try to fix some of them.

Thanks!
somehundred (2026-03-09 08:39:47+00:00): Changing tags on that area would have been sufficient, it didn't need to be deleted. It had retail tags on it. It could have been tagged like this:

landuse=retail
retail=tyres
markalex- (2026-03-09 08:48:13+00:00): You are completely right.
I always forget about landuse other than construction. Can you revert this changeset, please?
somehundred (2026-03-09 08:53:05+00:00): Done and changed to retail.
markalex- (2026-03-09 08:53:57+00:00): Thank you!
OlasMapy (2026-03-08 17:55:21+00:00): dziękuję
MappingMore (2026-03-10 04:32:13+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:179614469
Miranda Dickinson (2026-03-13 00:34:16+00:00): House number was added to attributes
Piagno (2026-03-08 17:44:35+00:00): parfait merci :)
Miranda Dickinson (2026-03-13 00:34:49+00:00): House number was added to attributes
pwbriggs (2026-03-14 00:32:19+00:00): Hey, I noticed that you deleted houses https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1280677896, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1280677897, and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1280677870.

However, I still see those 3 buildings in Bing aerial imagery. Is that outdated (imagery is generally a couple years old) and the buildings have been removed since, or did you deleted them unintentionally?

Thanks!
pwbriggs (2026-03-14 00:34:58+00:00): Ah, I checked some other imagery and indeed those houses look demolished. Sorry for the nuisance question, thanks for the edits.

Happy mapping!
Miranda Dickinson (2026-03-13 00:35:09+00:00): House number was edited
Miranda Dickinson (2026-03-13 00:35:49+00:00): Attributes were edited in this feature - name of building was added
NeisBot (2026-03-08 17:51:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/456771336 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Ferienwohnung in Burghausen"
---
Zum Beispiel könnte eine neutralere und sachlichere Version deines Textes lauten: "Ferienwohnung in Burghausen"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-03-17 05:33:02+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/179549355
opendcc (2026-04-06 16:02:20+00:00): corrected.
Zol87 (2026-03-12 20:36:56+00:00): Thanks for your additions. Please use more precise addresses for places in strip malls. The hyphenated address is for the whole center while the individual address is for the individual store. I have corrected these.
TriRIK (2026-03-08 18:24:54+00:00): A consistency change, like the other link on the highways
IvaKraljić (2026-03-10 16:07:49+00:00): The unnecessary tag has since been deleted in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179642267. #OptimoRoute
NeisBot (2026-03-08 18:21:41+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 37 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/690030959 v3 | 8 crossings
https://osm.org/way/690030961 v3 | 6 crossings
https://osm.org/way/690030949 v4 | 6 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/6473690946 v2
https://osm.org/node/4612112923 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179545767
IvaKraljić (2026-03-10 16:07:52+00:00): The wrong tag has since been fixed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179642187. #OptimoRoute
IvaKraljić (2026-03-10 16:07:27+00:00): The wrong tags have since been fixed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179644166. #OptimoRoute
TheNightRider (2026-03-09 14:01:48+00:00): Continuing with that logic, although it was built as a restaurant (because it has a kitchen), it's actually not condemned to even be retail. They could rip all that out and convert it to an office. So then we should revert to building=yes until we see what happens there!
gpserror (2026-03-09 17:16:33+00:00): Chances are it will not be residential in a retail area...
TheNightRider (2026-03-09 17:49:10+00:00): It could be residential or office, and they could add on and build it higher. The buildings across the street and next door have retail (including restaurants) on the ground level and offices and apartments above. I could see a developer come in and turn that into a 3- to 5-storey building just like across the street.
TheNightRider (2026-03-09 17:52:51+00:00): 3-storey is right across the street and 5-story is just to the south of Wasabi and the plaza. A 5-storey building there would be interesting.
Taya_S (2026-03-08 19:20:32+00:00): Reverted questionable edits by sockpuppet account

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179547869
eggie (2026-03-08 19:23:39+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  Je hebt deels een weg op een weg getekend. Dat noemen we duplicated ways. Dat geeft een foutmelding.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-03-08 19:26:57+00:00): Duplicated way verwijderd
NeisBot (2026-03-08 18:39:15+00:00): Hello Confird, welcome to OSM, and thank you for your contributions!

I've taken a look at your recent edits and wanted to discuss a few discrepancies I noticed regarding the surrounding environmental features. Specifically, the locations in your edits don't seem to align with the typical geographical characteristics expected in that area. Here are some (max 10) relevant links to the edits:
https://osm.org/way/1486595521
https://osm.org/way/1486595520
https://osm.org/relation/20299949

Could you please take a look?
Looking forward to your response.

#Somewhere
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179546286
Taya_S (2026-03-08 19:16:58+00:00): Reverted fantasy edits

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179547740
IvaKraljić (2026-03-08 21:04:58+00:00): The unnecessary node has since been deleted in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179551328. #OptimoRoute
IvaKraljić (2026-03-10 16:07:47+00:00): The wrong tag has since been fixed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179642333. #OptimoRoute
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-04 04:06:44+00:00): Fix malformed phone number and opening_hours=* and use more correct top-level tag for SEO Vengoo POI in changeset 183621744

https://osm.org/changeset/183621744
NeisBot (2026-03-08 18:54:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13627829418 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Building constructor"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-17 05:33:04+00:00): 🗑️🤖 Element deleted by https://osm.org/changeset/179982385

 If you believe this deletion was incorrect or would like to clarify the intent of the original tags, please reply here.
Peter Elderson (2026-04-25 20:58:24+00:00): Hoi @eggie, weet je zeker dat deze vlakken rond de Simon de Danser rotonde gras zijn? Het ziet er op diverse viewers uit als een korrelig asfalt-achtig iets. 
landuse=grass
1486663070, v1
landuse	grass	
landuse=grass
1486663071, v1
landuse	grass	
landuse=grass
1486663072, v1
landuse	grass	
landuse=grass
1486663073, v1
landuse	grass	
landuse=grass
1486663074, v1
landuse	grass	
mvg Peter
eggie (2026-04-25 21:02:57+00:00): Hoi Peter,
Je zou best gelijk kunnen hebben.
Dat heb ik ooit ingetekend toen het werd aangelegd.
Kom er bijna dagelijks langs. Zal maandag even kijken. 
Groet,
eggie
eggie (2026-04-26 05:36:49+00:00): Thx.. Voorlopig aangepast naar kerb met asphalt.
Groet,
eggie
IvaKraljić (2026-03-10 16:07:41+00:00): The wrong tag has since been fixed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179642638. #OptimoRoute
CAM-Gerlach (2026-03-09 16:35:47+00:00): Hey again! Another mapper already found and fixed it so no worries (he's currently working on a tool to detect node drags, so this proved a good test of it), but just wanted to let you know that node 1433582661 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1433582661 you moved was shared with the parking area, causing an accidental node drag distorting the parking area's shape. This can occasionally happen to even experienced mappers sometimes when using iD; always a good idea to check if a node is attached to anything you don't intend to move before moving it. In this case you would want to detach the node from the parking way first before moving it (I'm a JOSM user, but according to some googling shift-clicking the node and the way you want to detach it from then pressing D will apparently detach it in iD). Thanks, and happy mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179547281
IvaKraljić (2026-03-10 16:07:44+00:00): The wrong tag has since been fixed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179642579. #OptimoRoute
rempshaener (2026-03-08 21:35:24+00:00): Hallo,
hier möchte ich auch noch einmal fragen: was versprichst du dir von dieser Änderung?
Viele Grüße
Michi_10 (2026-03-09 06:05:16+00:00): Guten Morgen,
ich habe den Punkt entnommen, da vorhin folgendes Problem bestand: "Punkt: Schaltkasten im Freien sollte aufgrund seiner Eigenschaften ein alleinstehender Punkt sein". Dies war vorher der Fall, jetzt ist das Problem nicht mehr da, da der Punkt entnommen wurde.
Viele Grüße und einen schönen Tag noch
rempshaener (2026-03-09 20:03:24+00:00): Hallo,
hier wird der Zaun nur kurz durch den Verteilerkasten unterbrochen, wodurch die Wirkung des Zauns trotzdem durchgängig bleibt.
Es bestehen nur zwei Möglichkeiten, das abzubilden: den Kasten als Fläche erfassen und den Zaun an beiden Seiten anbinden. Was bei Verteilerkästen unüblich ist.
Oder der Kasten wird Node im Zaun.
Bitte nicht blind auf irgendwelche Tools vertrauen - diese bilden sicher einige, aber eben nicht alle Fälle ab.
Ich habe den vorherigen Zustand wiederhergestellt.
Viele Grüße
Michi_10 (2026-03-10 19:29:06+00:00): Hi,
vielen Dank für deine Rückmeldung. Mir war zum Zeitpunkt der Korrektur unklar, ob der Zaun durch den Verteilerkasten unterbrochen wird oder nicht. Da dies der Fall zu sein scheint, mögen die Tools nicht alle Probleme mit realen Bedingungen übereinstimmen lassen.
Viele Grüße
IvaKraljić (2026-03-10 16:07:38+00:00): The wrong tag has since been fixed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179642696. #OptimoRoute
CAM-Gerlach (2026-03-09 17:43:50+00:00): Hi OSMJon, thanks for the detailed changeset comment! Based on that, it looks like the name "Hoogendam" was accidentally applied not just to the road as intended, but to this entire neighborhood, which I fixed in changeset 179596391 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179596391 .

This was an easy mistake to make in this situation especially as a new mapper due to the existing residential area way partially (and inconsistently) sharing a bunch of nodes with the road, and both also sharing some but not all nodes with a boundary way of another neighborhood. In that case, it was easy to accidentally select the residential area way rather than the road. Checking carefully in the inspector panel to see what was selected can avoid this; however, to fix the real underlying issue I went ahead in that changeset with decoupling both boundary ways from the road centerline here and elsewhere around this neighborhood and also consistently gluing them with each other.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179547377
9_tab (2026-03-08 22:38:33+00:00): For anybody searching:: two changes are in Portugal, the other in Austria
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179547647
CAM-Gerlach (2026-03-09 16:20:46+00:00): Thanks!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179547807
CAM-Gerlach (2026-03-09 16:27:28+00:00): Was going to send you the original for your bot testing, but I see you already found and fixed it!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179547807
ehrm (2026-04-19 19:49:35+00:00): There is no such thing as a Majlis Park Metro Depot.  Why blindly change ways and tags for an entire area of land without properly checking aerial imagery, or confirming if something called a Majlis Park depot even exists?  Also, why lie on changesets with "local knowledge" when that's clearly not the case?
Vonter (2026-04-29 15:36:29+00:00): Hello,

Apologies for any inadvertent errors in this changeset. I was attempting to add the newly opened sections of the metro, but in the process seem to have made this error. While I didn't survey the area, based on my familiarity with the metro network, it appeared to be that the [land was intended for a depot](https://www.hindustantimes.com/cities/delhi-news/dmrc-floats-3-19-crore-tender-for-design-consultant-of-central-vista-depot-101775501556076.html). In case this is wrong, please do correct the error.

Regards,
Vonter
Wildsharky (2026-03-10 05:14:20+00:00): Revert of 179547240
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-04-07 07:49:27+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9481999811/history has image = https://streetcomplete.app/p/330423.jpg that was added in this edit
https://streetcomplete.app/p/330423.jpgis a link to a temporary files hosted at streetcomplete.app. Note that this images will be deleted after note is closed! So adding it to OSM objects is not very useful.

Upload your photos to for example Wikimedia Commons if you want to keep them (and link with wikimedia_commons=). Uploading photos made by someone else needs a license assignment.
Wildsharky (2026-03-10 05:12:52+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:179615766
NieWnen (2026-03-10 20:30:02+00:00): Cześć, dzięki za pierwsze zmiany. Jak coś, to nie dajemy opisowych nazw. Jak chcesz coś dodatkowego opisać, czego nie opisują tagi, to można dać to w tag `description`.

Pojawiło się też parę innych błędów, część już ktoś poprawił, ale pozostały takie jak np. barrier=gate surface=gravel, gdzie raczej powinna być to droga.
noexit=yes to nie jest blokada drogi, ani nie oznacza znaku na ślepą drogę, a oznacza, że linia w tym miejscu się kończy. 
Wjazdy do garaży/parkingów powinny być połączone z drogą.

Poprawiłem powyższe.
IvaKraljić (2026-03-10 16:07:35+00:00): The wrong tag has since been fixed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179642793. #OptimoRoute
marczoutendijk (2026-04-05 13:57:09+00:00): You are using landuse=4 on many spots.
What kind of landuse is that?

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
flohoff (2026-03-08 21:07:15+00:00): Moin,
die Bäume hast du doch aus dem Baumkataster oder? Dürfen wir die importieren?

Flo
stirps (2026-03-08 21:35:32+00:00): Es ist kein automatisierter Import, nein. Ich habe mir Satellitenbilder und den Kataster genommen und in JOSM als Layer übereinandergelegt. Dann bin ich nach und nach manuell Straßen durchgegangen und habe mir auf Satellitenbildern angeschaut, wo Bäume stehen und mit dem Kataster abgeglichen. Wenn das vollkommen abstrus aussah habe ich mir auch noch von dir aufgenommene Bilder auf Mapillary angesehen, um herauszufinden wo jetzt wie viele Bäume in welchem Abstand stehen. Ich habe für den hier gemachten Teil um die drei Stunden gebraucht und wirklich jeden Baum manuell platziert.

Sollte das doch als Import gelten steht der Kataster unter der Datenlizenz Deutschland 2.0, ist also notfalls kompatibel.
IvaKraljić (2026-03-08 21:01:40+00:00): The unnecessary node has since been deleted in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179551224#map=18/41.728947/-71.444762. #OptimoRoute
aaronq227 (2026-03-11 21:24:02+00:00): Hi Simon Shuvo,
I noticed the primary way you added, Netrokona Bypass, appears to still be under construction in Bing aerial imagery. Do you have any resources confirming it's open to traffic that you would be able to share? If it is not open yet, would you be willing to update the tagging to highway=construction and add construction=primary? 
Thank you for your time and I look forward to hearing from you!
Simon Shuvo (2026-03-18 20:15:24+00:00): Thanks. The road is almost completetd. Most portion of the road is unofficialy open for traffic flow.
aaronq227 (2026-03-20 20:05:27+00:00): Hi Simon Shuvo,
Thank you for responding and adding in construction tags.
MappingMore (2026-03-10 06:13:21+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:179618634
IvaKraljić (2026-03-10 16:07:32+00:00): The wrong tag has since been fixed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179642896. #OptimoRoute
habi (2026-03-11 09:21:24+00:00): Hey chnuessli
Wieso hast du den Defi hier gelöscht?
Dieser wurde kurz vorher (aus meiner Sicht korrekt) vom Tennisclub Bolligen erfasst: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179526597
Gruss,
habi

PS: Ich bin hier, weil ich schaue, was neue OSM-Accounts rund um Bern machen, und bin deshalb auf https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Tennisclub%20Bolligen aufmerksam geworden.
chnuessli (2026-03-11 09:24:31+00:00): Hey habi
Es war ein Duplikat von https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13626520301. Der Tennisclub hat sich per Mail bei uns  gemeldet.
habi (2026-03-11 09:36:28+00:00): 🤦‍♂️, das habe ich nicht gesehen :)

Ich bin auch wegen der wieder aufgeflammten Diskussion im Forum hier.
Die gute Pflege der Daten durch dich unterstützt meine Argumentation einer Antwort, die ich gerade schreibe.
IvaKraljić (2026-03-10 16:07:29+00:00): The wrong tag has since been fixed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179642979#map=18/41.727798/-71.467521. #OptimoRoute
LordGarySugar (2026-03-30 04:06:20+00:00): Why? Reverted. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180610861
IvaKraljić (2026-03-10 15:02:35+00:00): The wrong tag has since been fixed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179643072. #OptimoRoute
pyrog (2026-03-09 16:09:27+00:00): Bonjour,
Attention aux relations routes en ajoutant des trottoirs et des passages piétons (ici un itinéraire de randonnée pédestre).

Ta modification du passage piéton à interrompue le "PR 9 — Sentier des buttes".
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1486507500/history/2

Je corrige.

Cordialement,
Yves — Groupe OSM Plein air
daepb (2026-03-09 16:21:58+00:00): Bonjour,

Désolé et merci pour la correction !

Je pensais justement y avoir fait attention et j'avais l'impression que le chemin commençait au niveau du parc, puisque je ne voyais pas d'objet membre de la relation avant le passage piéton. J'ai effectivement dû mal voir !
IvaKraljić (2026-03-10 16:07:54+00:00): The wrong tag has since been fixed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179642117. #OptimoRoute
MappingMore (2026-03-10 03:53:14+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:179613049
iandees (2026-03-08 21:08:40+00:00): Hi! It looks like a node in this changeset was accidentally moved. This can happen when panning the map. The node has been moved back to its previous position.
Wildsharky (2026-03-10 05:10:15+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:179569716
FajrAl (2026-03-09 03:01:00+00:00): place=village digunakan untuk wilayah administrasi desa, sementara place=hamlet digunakan untuk kampung.
Gaung Tebono (2026-03-09 11:08:19+00:00): Place=village yang khusus untuk setiap kelurahan/desa pasti diikutsertakan juga butir Wikidata/Wikipedia nya, sedangkan place=village yang tidak diikutsertakan butir Wikidata/Wikipedia nya merupakan wilayah dusun setingkat lingkungan, berbeda dengan kampung, kalau kampung itu setingkat RT/RW sedangkan dusun/lingkungan diatasnya kampung. Ingat kawan, dusun/lingkungan disini status nya diatasnya kampung, sedangkan kampung setara dengan lingkup RT dan RW.

Salam 🙏🏻
Gaung Tebono (2026-03-09 11:09:29+00:00): Place=hamlet ditujukan khusus untuk kampung setingkat RT RW sedangkan dusun cukup memakai Place=village saja supaya identitas nya terlihat jelas.
FajrAl (2026-03-09 14:59:53+00:00): Perihal itu, bisa ikuti pedoman tag Indonesia:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Id:Pedoman_Penandaan_Indonesia
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Indonesian_Tagging_Guidelines

Saat ini, kampung dan dusun menggunakan place=hamlet.