piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2026-04-02 01:15:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 28 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/392342898 v4 | 9 crossings
https://osm.org/way/392342900 v2 | 9 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1237157107 v3 | 5 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/3955754716 v2
https://osm.org/node/11490218248 v2
https://osm.org/node/11490218249 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180745202
Logan Moyers (2026-06-01 01:27:23+00:00): Hello, and thank you for fixing my mistake (I still learning how everything works), but I don’t understand what got changed, can you give me a visual of what you changed?
NeisBot (2026-04-02 01:39:39+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 12 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1015950348 v1 | 4 crossings
https://osm.org/way/884609438 v4 | 4 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/2349340587 v4

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180745540
NeisReview (2026-04-10 04:33:08+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/180745580
NeisBot (2026-04-02 01:48:39+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 12 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/238903264 v4 | 12 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180745663
NeisReview (2026-04-10 04:33:08+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/180750865
NeisBot (2026-04-02 01:54:48+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/1495325141 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Retail store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-10 04:33:04+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181125529
(Delete spam tags. First version)
TheSwavu (2026-04-02 03:32:06+00:00): Hi,

The phone number on n1043256287 is not valid. I can't find this place on the web. If you can remember would you please update. I've moved the existing number to fixme:phone

Thanks.
TheSwavu (2026-04-02 03:33:00+00:00): Sorry that should have been https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1043256287
GreenPastel (2026-04-02 11:46:42+00:00): Are you sure the number was invalid? I input it manually by reading it on the front window. I also still have the business card with me, and the number on it is 0481 775 831.
GreenPastel (2026-04-02 11:56:25+00:00): You can find the business on the internet at https://www.fresha.com/lvp/shushi-massage-ilex-street-red-cliffs-Rv3NNA

This should confirm the business name is correct.
I was skeptical at first if this was the same business, but the two things that make me confident this is the same one, is that the address on the web page matches exactly with the location (47 Ilex Street), and the hours Monday to Sunday 9am to 9pm also match exactly with the hours advertised on the front window of the building.
fortera_au (2026-04-05 03:53:22+00:00): You've missed a digit, plus the formatting should be +61 481 775 831. Mobiles are grouped as 3 x 3 digits, landlines are area code by itself then 2 x 4 digits
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180745873
GreenPastel (2026-04-05 12:25:46+00:00): I see. Thanks. I'll make sure to do it correctly from now on. I knew the formatting looked weird but I was going along with the formatting that the number text box uses as an example. So I thought I was supposed to follow the example OSM gave.
Flamen_Sru (2026-06-22 16:52:05+00:00): Hello Warrior302, 
Thank You for your contribution. I have fixed the validation error related to buildings intersection. Make sure to fix all validation errors before uploading a changeset.
Happy Mapping!
UsefulRabbit (2026-04-02 02:24:58+00:00): Source: https://npgallery.nps.gov/GetAsset/0c7436d7-6f4a-4db5-a453-5b8b1235ef25
Kovoschiz (2026-04-02 04:09:20+00:00): 1. Please don't unsplit the exact `footway=crossing` crosswalk sections
2. Please don't delete `barrier=` 
3. Please don't add `barrier=` to intersecting points. That can't show where it is. 
4. Please don't change `=traffic_signals` to `=zebra`
Kovoschiz (2026-04-02 04:28:41+00:00): 5. Centre St near DVRW is likely regardless as illegal, as it's 15m from the crosswalk
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-02 06:48:05+00:00): Hi Nagarjuna18, welcome to OSM.

Just a short question: Is the name of the following highway correct? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/569232959/history/28

Thanks.
FajrAl (2026-04-02 08:53:52+00:00): Jika itu menara telekomunikasi, tag man_made=communications_tower sudah benar. Jika hanya tower, maka itu menara pandang.
Achmad Alqadri (2026-04-08 01:29:19+00:00): @FajrAI, untuk menara pandang bisa pakai tag tower:type=observation atau tower:type=watchtower
FajrAl (2026-04-08 01:34:51+00:00): Benar, mohon dicek kembali 3 fitur ini:
node/12622676904
node/12622676903
node/12622676905
Wildsharky (2026-04-03 06:22:25+00:00): Revert of 180738935
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-20 23:46:05+00:00): Clean up and move tags for SEO POI from apartment building to separate node in changeset 184371570

https://osm.org/changeset/184371570
Kovoschiz (2026-04-02 08:45:57+00:00): 1. Please don't delete `barrier=`
2. Please don't merge `=traffic_signals` and `=crossing`
Kovoschiz (2026-04-02 08:55:09+00:00): 3. Please don't make refuge island section `footway=crossing`
Taksine (2026-04-18 11:24:59+00:00): name= should use local language, Please write the English name in name:en=
5m4u9 (2026-04-03 02:58:00+00:00): Hola, bienvenid@ al mapa!

Eliminaste unas calles/avenidas que existen, seguramente sin intención, ya que estás comenzando a editar. 

No pasa nada, ya quedo solucionado...
Kovoschiz (2026-04-02 08:51:43+00:00): 0. Please don't delete `barrier=`
1. Please don't change `=pedestrian` to `=footway` , as the former can physically be usable by vehicles
Kovoschiz (2026-04-02 09:02:53+00:00): 2. Please don't draw all physically possible pedestrian crossing methods. This is walking on roadway, which doesn't need to be drawn.
NeisBot (2026-04-02 04:15:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13700332131 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Septic facility"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-04-10 04:33:06+00:00): 🗑️ Element deleted by https://osm.org/changeset/180790301
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:11:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
Raquel Dezidério Souto (2026-06-15 20:01:05+00:00): Well, you reverted also one feature which was mapped by human.
Raquel Dezidério Souto (2026-06-15 20:02:07+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1495352510/history/2

This feature was deleted and was mapped by human.
NeisBot (2026-04-02 04:42:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/1495357264 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "The Isla apartments"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-10 10:33:04+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181138208
(Delete spam tags. First version)
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:09:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:12:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:12:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
NeisBot (2026-04-02 05:12:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13700377570 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Sod installation company"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-10 10:33:09+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181138211
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:10:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:12:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
aaei924 (2026-04-29 12:39:18+00:00): 안녕하세요,
신촌 지역 편집하신 부분에 대해 말씀드리려는 것이 있어 댓글을 남깁니다.

도로를 둘로 나누는 것은 중앙에 분리 시설이 있는 경우에만 하도록 되어 있습니다. (분리대가 잠시 끊어지는 구간은 예외)
신촌역로는 중앙에 울타리 등 분리 시설이 없기 때문에, 방향별 분리 대상에 해당하지 않습니다.

향후 지도 편집에 참고하여 주시면 감사하겠습니다.
nuitsfauves (2026-05-10 10:13:10+00:00): Salut ! 
Merci d'avoir cartographié ça :) 
Est-ce que le chemin piéton au Nord, qui semble toucher le parking, le relie effectivement ou pas ? 
Et par ailleurs : les chemins à l'intérieur du cimetière n'étaient pas reliés entre eux à chaque fois qu'ils se croisaient. Je l'ai fait :)
matth_cjl (2026-05-11 05:21:21+00:00): Bonjour.
Non le chemin au nord de touche pas. C'est une erreur merci de l'avoir notifie
Certains chi's ne vont pas jusqu'au bout. Le tracé est comme je l'ai fait. Si certains n'étaient pas connectés par contre merci de l'avoir fait
NeisBot (2026-04-02 05:42:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13700487111 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Plastic surgery clinic"
---
Например, более нейтральная и фактическая версия вашего текста могла бы быть: "Клиника пластической хирургии"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-10 10:33:11+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181138213
(Delete spam tags. First version)
Wildsharky (2026-04-07 03:57:52+00:00):  Reverted in changeset id:180922554
eggie (2026-04-02 09:31:59+00:00): Hi Why tagging amenity=shop?
I removed the shops.. No building according the Dutch Registry

https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/?searchQuery=Haarlerbergweg&objectId=0363010000909101&theme=BRT+Achtergrond&geometry.x=125134.77228731207&geometry.y=479482.7397368393&zoomlevel=12.44273096206747

Greetz,
eggie
ma-rt-in (2026-04-27 18:50:59+00:00): Hi,
das Krankenhaus wurde bereits geschlossen, daher entferne ich deine Änderungen wieder.

Gruß
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 08:59:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
iandees (2026-04-02 13:14:03+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5776631410 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180767475, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
Martin Constantino–Bodin (2026-04-02 07:06:14+00:00): Désolé pour la taille du groupe de modifications :-\
~Jhellico (2026-04-02 16:01:51+00:00): Не треба ставити на точках під'їздів адресні теґи!
Wildsharky (2026-04-03 12:15:20+00:00): Revert of 180745663
BCNorwich (2026-05-11 05:27:31+00:00): Your highway path Way: 217602973 has many problems crossing over other highways as stated above. In many places it seems to duplicate existing highways which could disrupt routing.

Regards Bernard.
Sagei (2026-04-02 07:11:39+00:00): Note - needed to adjust the number of lanes on the east-most side of Bangerter between 12600 South and 11400 South (varied between 2 and 6 lanes depending on the segment being edited.
BCNorwich (2026-05-11 05:32:35+00:00): Deleting features and re-mapping them in order to make corrections results in OSM history being deleted as well. It is better to amend/correct the existing features thus all history is maintained.

Regards Bernard.
NeisBot (2026-04-02 07:21:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 8 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/87321823 v26 | 8 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180752966
rarad74 (2026-04-02 08:16:56+00:00): You didnt listen too. This user mock us. Didnt respond to any messages. He use very old imagery set ( older that 12 years).
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-02 20:33:17+00:00): Thanks @rarad74

Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180754925
Yog Sot (2026-04-02 21:16:19+00:00): to moze faktycznie private jest zasadne , pewno fragment od ul Rydla, bo tam brama zamknięta i wtedy nawigacja nie bedzie puszcxzac.
grzegorz75jan (2026-04-02 19:27:29+00:00): This edit is incorrect. The previous edit of this road was correct. In Poland, maps from geoportal.pl should be used because Esri and especially Bing maps are often incorrectly calibrated or out of date.

https://postimg.cc/zymkW76X
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180753314
pavelito (2026-04-03 15:21:24+00:00): Hello grzegorz75jan,
Thank you very much for sharing the information and for fixing my incorrect changes. I will definitely take this into account in the future. I sincerely apologize for any inconvenience caused by the use of outdated satellite imagery.

Best regards,
Pavel
FajrAl (2026-04-03 14:12:07+00:00): All is good. You can join to OSM Indonesia if you have any question. https://t.me/osmindonesia
felipeeugenio (2026-04-02 12:30:44+00:00): Hello. Those are service roads most certain. In case they are public, those are living_street thou.
regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180753882
HoaBinhLake (2026-04-03 15:35:20+00:00): Hi felipeeugenio,
Thank you for reaching out, I will defer to your edits. I appreciate your feedback!
Dodko (2026-04-04 16:13:06+00:00): Lepšie je nezmazať existujúcu budovu s adresou keď nebola zbúraná, ale len opraviť jej geometriu aby bola zachovaná história budovy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/113708128/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/113708280/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/113708250/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/113708161/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/113708312/history
suzunote (2026-04-02 11:42:43+00:00): 編集ありがとうございます！
後から見返しやすくするために、2026/04ではなく何をしたのか内容が分かるコメントを書いていただけると助かります🙏

参考：変更セットの良いコメント
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:%E5%A4%89%E6%9B%B4%E3%82%BB%E3%83%83%E3%83%88%E3%81%AE%E8%89%AF%E3%81%84%E3%82%B3%E3%83%A1%E3%83%B3%E3%83%88
pesec (2026-04-02 10:46:12+00:00): Здравствуйте.
Вы добавили новый вход в здание.
Я ранее обозначал входы в дома для посетителей этого зоопарка/питомника. Насколько помню, это хлев с лошадьми и вход для них. На сколько он тут целесообразен?
eggie (2026-04-02 09:20:34+00:00): Hi,

You are removing buildings? Why?
BING Maps is outdated anyway.
Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2026-04-02 09:23:45+00:00): https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/?searchQuery=Ambachtstraat+40&objectId=0984100001158314&theme=BRT+Achtergrond&geometry.x=195772.272&geometry.y=395433.756&zoomlevel=13.12717034894358&bijbehorendeAdressen=Pand
Old building was demolished.. New building is in progress.
eggie (2026-04-02 09:24:53+00:00): reverted due deleting building under construction by changeset #180757457
ajmat (2026-04-05 05:05:33+00:00): Reverted in changeset id: 180879941
NeisAgent (2026-04-02 10:33:20+00:00): 🕵 The changeset tags appear to reference Google as a data source.

Please note that using Google Maps, Google Street View, or similar Google services as a mapping source is not allowed in OpenStreetMap due to license restrictions.

More information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google

If the data in this changeset was derived from Google or another incompatible source, the edits may need to be reverted.

If this is a misunderstanding and the data was collected from permitted sources (e.g. local survey, Bing imagery, local knowledge, etc.), please clarify in a reply.
micka11 (2026-04-02 11:15:27+00:00): Oh im sorry i forgot about that it was quite a long time since i last changed anything. can you delete my change?
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-02 20:41:31+00:00): Hi,

danke für die Antwort. Wenn gewünscht, kann ich das komplette Changeset zurücksetzen. Dies bedeutet dann aber, dass die Änderungen an beiden Wegen  dieses nicht mehr vorhanden sind.

Viele Grüße
micka11 (2026-04-02 21:16:35+00:00): Ja lösch doch das ganze Changeset. Bin mir eh nicht zu 100% sicher ob das stimmt. Wollte es nur ändern um mein Routing zu ermöglichen. Aber werde mal mit dem Fahrrad vorbeischauen und es dann erneut anpassen falls nötig.
Vielen Dank und Sorry für die Umstände!
Viele Grüsse
NeisRevert (2026-04-03 08:58:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/180800659
where the comment is: "Revert based on user request"
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-03 08:59:40+00:00): Hallo @micka11,

habe das Changeset wie gewünscht zurückgesetzt. 

Viele Grüße und #HappyMapping
Wildsharky (2026-04-03 12:12:11+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:180804685
FajrAl (2026-04-02 09:02:09+00:00): Berikan judul (komentar) yang deskriptif, seperti "Memperbaiki geometri jalan" daripada menulisnya sebagai ";lm;lm;lm" atau "jygjyg."
NeisBot (2026-04-02 09:00:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/633670743 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Islamic school"

#MapWithoutSpam
MI RADEN RAHMAT BALONGBENDO (2026-04-02 09:27:04+00:00): akan saya perbaiki
NeisBot (2026-04-02 09:02:32+00:00): Hello nebulousCarina, welcome to OSM, and thank you for your contributions!

I've taken a look at your recent edits and wanted to discuss a few discrepancies I noticed regarding the surrounding environmental features. Specifically, the locations in your edits don't seem to align with the typical geographical characteristics expected in that area. Here are some (max 10) relevant links to the edits:
https://osm.org/node/13700879250

Could you please take a look?
Looking forward to your response.

#Somewhere
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180756522
nebulousCarina (2026-04-03 21:51:13+00:00): muted
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2026-04-05 13:46:30+00:00): hi can you explain this edit. thanks in advance before further action
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-05 15:18:51+00:00): 👍
nebulousCarina (2026-04-07 16:21:31+00:00): hi NunoCapeloCaldeira, I added a label to the Madeira relation, since it didn't have one yet. For labels see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Role:label
I placed the label in the ocean outside of Madeira's actual borders so that it sits between the territories that belong to Madeira.
ltrvs (2026-04-02 15:39:36+00:00): Tiedoksi: korjasin tässä muutoskokoelmassa oletettavasti vahingossa rikkoutuneen tien.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180774597
NeisBot (2026-04-02 09:27:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13700879666 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Cafe in Brooklyn"

#MapWithoutSpam