piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_5359 (2025-08-14 07:43:04+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/462191267. What is the mean of the new added tags
cid=7951230594446406763
coordinates=39.93403145,-75.17976738
height=13 (changed from 7 to 13)
image=https://maps.app.goo.gl/Bp2c5ewjRo8tpjek6
mid=/g/11whhjvry1
place id=ChIJUYlzPunHxokRazQyJRlyWG4
plus code=87F6WRMC+J3
verified=true
What is the license and source of this data?
Are you aware that we are not allowed to copy or reproduce Google Maps?
MassCartog (2025-12-23 17:15:24+00:00): User michael60634 downvoted this commit in retaliation, nothing is wrong with it.
user_8655426 (2025-08-17 01:16:15+00:00): Reverted (vandalism)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170545985

JA:破壊行為
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:破壊行為
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170413787
aharvey (2025-10-31 00:31:26+00:00): I've never heard of Chatswood North being used, do you have any references where the phrase is in use?
leonardjos (2025-10-31 00:49:51+00:00): In interactions with Willoughby Council, they refer to this area being part of the Chatswood North precinct.

The area is the subject of an ongoing traffic management review, see meeting agenda here (https://www.willoughby.nsw.gov.au/files/assets/public/v/1/documents/meeting-documents-agendas-and-minutes-meeting-reports-statements-of-determinations-registers/ecm_7278798_v2_traffic-committee-meeting-agenda-9-october-2025.pdf) . Item 5.4 on the Agenda is the "Chatswood North Local Area Traffic Management Study".
aharvey (2025-10-31 02:31:41+00:00): Thanks, I can see in that document it's referring both to "Chatswood North" as the name of a "Local Area Traffic Management (LATM)" which I probably wouldn't think as warranting a place=neighbourhood but also as the "Chatswood North precinct" which probably does warrant place=neighbourhood.

place=neighbourhood has varied use in Sydney ranging from GNB assigned urban/rural place names that don't form formal suburb/localities, usually as a area/region of a suburb, but also for named residential estates.

I think then it's okay to map "Chatswood North" as a neighbourhood here, though improved tagging practices and tags to better categorise "neighbourhoods" would be good for OSM.
CAM-Gerlach (2026-05-24 22:29:15+00:00): SEO spam removed in changeset 170421265 and changeset 183129395

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170421265

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183129395
-io- (2025-08-14 04:15:58+00:00): Добрый день. Объясните пожалуйста,   почему удалили теги smoothness=* ?
Это считаете, что это запрещает движение автомобилей?
sklyarov_pa (2025-08-15 02:04:48+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_car&route=56.48589%2C84.98204%3B56.48869%2C84.97927 маршрут поездки. По какой причине он ранее не вел через тунель и сейчас также строит не верный маршрут?
-io- (2025-08-15 05:52:35+00:00): Не думаете, что, если навигатор неправильно прокладывает маршрут, то нужно решать вопрос с навигатором, а не подстраивать данные под конкретную реализацию алгоритма навигатора?

Valhala, например, в данном случае, создает маршрут гораздо точнее.

Прошу вас вернуть теги на место
sklyarov_pa (2025-08-15 07:16:09+00:00): Уточнение, а как решить вопрос с навигатором? На данном этапе маршрут строит верно, посмотрим как будет строить после обновления.
-io- (2025-08-15 08:39:05+00:00): Зависит от движка. У них у всех есть формы обратной связи. Сайты, GitHub и прочее.

Верный маршрут - это через туннель а потом через Мариинский переулок? У меня OSRM строит так.
sklyarov_pa (2025-08-15 08:44:33+00:00): Нет, верный маршрут через туннель и через парковку.
Alliegaytor (2025-08-14 02:27:38+00:00): Hi,

You seem to have accidentally deleted the Hawksburn railway station way (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/714353207). I've restored it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170414467. Sometimes the stations are mapped as ways rather than nodes, so make sure to pay attention to what ways you are deleting when deleting landuses.
Alliegaytor (2025-08-14 02:31:54+00:00): I've also restored w397260833 and w403604215 as I've just noticed those were also deleted.
LachlanTansey2009 (2025-08-14 05:54:45+00:00): Hello, 
Thank you for readding those. I do apologise for making this mistake and do thank you for informing me of this information.
royus7 (2025-08-14 02:02:14+00:00): there is evidence of a sharrow that is almost completely faded
royus7 (2025-08-14 02:58:12+00:00): I have put in a request through MySpartanburg / SeeClickFix to repaint the bike lanes, however it feels wrong to put it back on the map until it is actually repainted.
marc__marc (2026-02-21 19:48:36+00:00): HEllo,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13070086617
what did you mean with work for the level of facilities provided 
and mining ? you can't sleep in a tent nor in a caravan but you can sleep in a mining ? very strange
Kytharses (2026-02-22 19:31:07+00:00): What are you talking about?
bkil (2025-08-14 06:37:29+00:00): A településközpont elhelyezésére a következőt tudom javasolni:  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hungary/Fontos_szempontok
silversurfer83 (2025-08-14 07:53:41+00:00): Hi :)

good work adding fine detail to the database. Thank you.

I'd like to remark two things:

- if you map pools that are obviously in private backyards or the like, please add "access=private" and maybe "swimming_pool=personal". That way data consumers know that these are not available to the public at large.

- It's fine to map single parking spaces like you did. They do require to be within a larger "amenity=parking", though.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking

should you have any questions feel free to ask :)

happy mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170414495
Glassman (2025-08-15 23:54:12+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. 576 feet would be really high, but considering that this is in meters, that would be really high!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170415161
pitscheplatsch (2025-08-14 07:07:06+00:00): #NameCheck

Hello and welcome to OSM.

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits, particularly those concerning the names you've added or modified.

Some of these names caught my attention as they are quite unique or a bit unusual. Could you please confirm if these additions were intentional or if they might have been added mistakenly?

Looking forward to your response.

Thank you!
pitscheplatsch (2025-08-14 07:07:49+00:00): This is #spam and should be reverted.
Supaplex (2025-08-15 08:13:16+00:00): 請依據相關名稱規範來撰寫

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170468350
pitscheplatsch (2025-08-14 07:06:47+00:00): #NameCheck

Hello and welcome to OSM.

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits, particularly those concerning the names you've added or modified.

Some of these names caught my attention as they are quite unique or a bit unusual. Could you please confirm if these additions were intentional or if they might have been added mistakenly?

Looking forward to your response.

Thank you!
cinechopper (2025-08-14 16:48:56+00:00): Thanks for catching that, I fixed the gate that had the super long name.  Should be fixed now?
Senihtu (2025-08-23 16:28:15+00:00): Hi!
Ich kenne mich in Bad Soden nicht so aus. 
Aber nun kommt die Linie 803 (Relation 6485341) nicht mehr an ihrer Haltestelle im Bahnhof vorbei.
Soll das so sein?
Weiter frohes Mappen!
Senihtu
timmito (2025-08-29 19:26:14+00:00): Hi! Nach Inbetriebnahme des Neubaus der Haltestelle Bad Soden Bahnhof fuhr die Linie 803 wegen einer Baustelle in der Kronberger Straße weiterhin über die Salinenstraße. Mittlerweile wird der Bahnhof von allen Linien angefahren und auch die neue Haltestelle Mühlweg wird bedient. Ich hatte mich zunächst auf die Infrastruktur konzentriert und nur die Linie 253 aktualisiert. In den nächsten Tagen werde ich mir auch die anderen Relationen anschauen.
無限の刃 (2025-12-12 07:06:24+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:名称#name_は名称だけ
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Key:demolished:building
Ryo-a (2025-12-13 04:30:56+00:00): 仰ることは分かりますが、Every Doorというツールで屋外でメモした内容なので、荒天だったこともあり、いちいちタグまでつけていられませんでした。
なおGPS精度も格段に悪かったため、現場の写真等と合わせて位置調整をしないとトンデモない処にPOIが落ちています
（未編集で放置してた点を責めるのならば、勝手にどうぞですけども）
無限の刃 (2025-12-13 09:41:15+00:00): Every Door には、キーボードでの入力なしに既存の地物に「demolished:building」を付与するボタンがあります。
Ryo-a (2025-12-14 05:13:49+00:00): 機能紹介ありがとうございます
StreetSurveyor (2025-09-13 20:06:53+00:00): Please stop changing roads to prohibit foot traffic unless there is a legal restriction in place.
pitscheplatsch (2025-08-14 07:06:22+00:00): #NameCheck

Hello and welcome to OSM.

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits, particularly those concerning the names you've added or modified.

Some of these names caught my attention as they are quite unique or a bit unusual. Could you please confirm if these additions were intentional or if they might have been added mistakenly?

Looking forward to your response.

Thank you!
vasony (2025-08-16 09:27:35+00:00): Szia!

Ezzel a módosítással 3 tér eltűnt, tetem rá note-ot, hogy felmérendő, esetleg ha látszik a képekről.

Tamás
osminng (2025-08-17 12:17:52+00:00): Szia Tamás!

Hibásan kijelölt attribútum mozgatás történt, ekkor került rá véletlen a Töhötöm vezért utca több környezőre is.

Javítottam, mindegyik esetben visszaállítottam az eredeti utcanevet. Elnézést a hibáért, és köszi, hogy észlelted!
osminng (2025-08-17 12:18:12+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170563509 keretében történt a visszaállítás
pitscheplatsch (2025-08-14 07:05:57+00:00): #NameCheck

Hello and welcome to OSM.

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits, particularly those concerning the names you've added or modified.

Some of these names caught my attention as they are quite unique or a bit unusual. Could you please confirm if these additions were intentional or if they might have been added mistakenly?

Looking forward to your response.

Thank you!
pitscheplatsch (2025-08-14 07:05:03+00:00): This is #spam and should be reverted.
NieWnen (2025-08-14 17:03:39+00:00): Cześć,

proszę postaraj się tak nie robić tj. jeśli usługa się zmienia, to edytujemy tagi i nie usuwamy punktu, żeby podtrzymać jego historię.

W myśl zasady: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history

W przypadku drugiej zmiany tuż obok jeśli lokal nie został zburzony (a pewnie nie został), to warto zmienić na `shop=vacant`, albo dać `disused:shop=*` zamiast usuwać punkt, bo jest szansa, że w najbliższej przyszłości powstanie tam coś nowego i wystarczy właśnie zmienić tagi.

Te 2 zmiany wycofałem przywracając poprzednie punktu z przeniesieniem tagów nowej siłowni.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170446980
Ekwador (2025-08-14 17:07:05+00:00): Cześć, dzięki za zwrócenie mi na to uwagi. Przy następnych edycjach będę już o tym pamiętał :)
NieWnen (2025-08-14 17:06:07+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170417964#c1474649
osmviborg (2025-08-14 07:08:56+00:00): Please don't add address tags to buildings. We don't use that in Denmark.
DmVict (2025-08-15 09:38:28+00:00): Hello

Please, fix the way 389363530. It couldn't be a building, it should be landuse=residential or splitted and mapped properly.

Привіт. 

Будь ласка, виправте шлях 389363530. Це не може бути будівлею, це повинно бути landuse = житловий або його потрібно розділити і розмапити окремо.
eggie (2025-08-14 07:51:12+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
pitscheplatsch (2025-08-14 07:03:08+00:00): This is #spam and should be reverted.
bartgron (2025-08-14 08:01:01+00:00): I removed this tags
pitscheplatsch (2025-08-15 06:28:02+00:00): Thank you, bartgron
Sylabowy Kot (2025-08-16 07:50:21+00:00): Nothing beats a Sopot Dolny holiday.
pitscheplatsch (2025-08-17 06:33:55+00:00): @Sylabowy Kot - Thanks for your comment. Could you clarify how this relates to the changeset or the mapping in this area?
habi (2025-08-14 06:53:59+00:00): - https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4908507
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4908508
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4908509
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4908510
Taya_S (2025-08-17 10:17:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted DWG Ticket#2025081710000139
Addresses have been incorrectly added as name, no sources are cited and were reported as nonsensical, and the user does not communicate. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18623

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170558413
Tommybara (2025-09-09 02:53:09+00:00): Đường vừa được điều chỉnh lý trình, nhập vào đường Đặng Đại Độ. Bạn vui lòng cập nhật thông tin: https://thanhnien.vn/tphcm-dat-ten-moi-cho-60-tuyen-duong-185250724100127187.htm
Scout Jens (2025-08-14 07:44:23+00:00): meine Änderungen hier betreffen den Ort Rauental
uprkos (2025-08-19 18:05:33+00:00): Zarówno nazwa dodanego obiektu, jaki opis zestawu zmian, są niezgodne z zasadami OSM.
David_Serum (2025-08-19 21:36:18+00:00): Z czym masz problem szeryfie ? Cos ci nie na rączke ?
uprkos (2025-08-19 21:56:40+00:00): Proszę o poprawę nazwy obiektu - "Tablica pamiątkowa" jest do usunięcia.

Na przyszłość wpisuj proszę sensowne opisy zestawów, bo komentarz 'edit' jest całkowicie bezużyteczny.
David_Serum (2025-08-19 22:01:47+00:00): Jak mam nazwac tablice pamiatkowa ? Tablica pazdzierzowa ? Czep sie chlopie tramwaja a nie moich edycji. Ladujesz mi sie do jelonki a sam jestes z innej czesci polski. Bezuzyteczne jest twoj wtykany nos
uprkos (2025-08-19 22:17:36+00:00): Poprawiłem.

Jeśli nie będziesz się stosował do zasad OSM, zostaniesz zgłoszony i zablokowany.
grzegorz75jan (2025-08-19 22:32:58+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian

https://youtu.be/xBMIoypkdI4?list=PLTgtPjgzssHzsgAqYbi2QfRoRk1S9ioX5&t=2596

"Z czym masz problem szeryfie ? Cos ci nie na rączke ?"

Zadaj sobie to pytanie i na nie odpowiedz.

"Jak mam nazwac tablice pamiatkowa ? Tablica pazdzierzowa ?"

Jak widać da się tylko trzeba mieć trochę więcej w głowie a nie w gębie.

"Czep sie chlopie tramwaja a nie moich edycji."

Uwagi były jak najbardziej słuszne.

"Ladujesz mi sie do jelonki a sam jestes z innej czesci polski."

Jakie to ma znaczenie ?
Lokalnie edytujący może mieć co najwyżej lepszą wiedzę lokalną o obiekcie.


 Ladujesz mi sie do jelonki a sam jestes z innej czesci polski."

"Bezuzyteczne jest twoj wtykany nos"

Póki co jest słuszne. Twoje podejście do zwracanych uwag jest bezużyteczne.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170421256
woodpeck (2025-08-20 08:00:40+00:00): see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18639
grzegorz75jan (2025-08-20 08:14:03+00:00): And rightly so. Thank you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170421256
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-08-20 22:24:15+00:00): @grzegorz - coś komentarze się ci dublują 

nie wiem czy coś skopałeś czy osmcha ma focha
grzegorz75jan (2025-08-21 06:18:34+00:00): @Mateusz - miałem zdublowany jeden cytat w komentarzu a teraz widać zdublowane aż dwa komentarze.

Wprawdzie myszka mi świruje (Mouse Double Click) ale te podwójne komentarze pojawiły się raczej dopiero po moim drugim  komentarzu. To raczej coś OSMCha wariuje.
Comino (2025-08-14 07:45:36+00:00): Hi,

In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes".

Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag !
Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead.

For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Merchants#tagging-guidance
and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bitcoin

Happy mapping,

Edwin
mueschel (2025-08-15 10:04:42+00:00): Hi,
please have a look at this object, something went wrong with the tagging.
s8evq (2025-08-14 07:37:33+00:00): Changeset comment should have been "adding streetname" instead. Source = survey.
AndreaDp271 (2025-08-14 14:04:48+00:00): IT
Ciao! Grazie per il contributo! 🌟

Un piccolo consiglio: sarebbe meglio concentrare le modifiche su un’area geografica più ristretta, come Schio o Castelfranco, invece di mescolare luoghi lontani nello stesso changeset. Questo aiuta a evitare conflitti, facilita la revisione da parte di altri mappatori e mantiene la mappa più precisa.

Dal momento che si tratta di un bot, potresti considerare di regolarne le impostazioni in modo che divida le modifiche per area, così ogni changeset resta locale e più facile da gestire.

Per approfondire: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Grazie ancora per l’energia nella mappatura e buon mapping! 🗺️
--------------
EN

Hi there, and thanks for your contribution! 🌟

Just a friendly tip: it would be better if edits were focused on a smaller geographic area, like Schio or Castelfranco, rather than mixing distant locations in the same changeset. This helps prevent conflicts, makes it easier for fellow mappers to review, and keeps the map accurate.

Since this seems to be a bot, you might consider adjusting its settings to split edits by area, so each changeset stays local and easier to manage.

For more info: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks again for your mapping energy, and happy mapping! 🗺️
b-jazz (2025-08-14 15:24:56+00:00): Hi Andrea, 

Thanks for the note. As that wiki page points out, there is no agreed upon standard of how big a changeset should be or how many changes should be gathered into a single changeset. I try to walk a fine line and make the changeset area be no larger than a 3-character geohash. I've gotten complaints when I do too many small changes, and so I tweak things and get complaints when I make the area too large. I'll see if I can tweak things a little more, but I have a feeling it will still upset someone.
AndreaDp271 (2025-08-14 17:56:25+00:00): I agree with you that the wiki doesn’t specify any strict rule about changeset size. In my view, the main issue with your changeset wasn’t the number of edits, but that it included modifications in two different cities (and provinces).

I’m not sure who complained about too many small changesets, but personally I think it’s better to keep one changeset per city, even if it contains a lot of edits. In your case, the cities aren’t very large, so a changeset like yours wouldn’t be too big or too small, it seems perfectly acceptable, even if it modifies all the websites at once. For larger cities, I might split it into smaller changesets, though.
TheFighter137 (2025-08-17 15:27:38+00:00): Bonjour,
Vous avez (involontairement, sûrement) déplacé un point d'une piste cyclable à plusieurs centaines de mètres, générant un tracé incohérent. Je m'occupe de la correction.
Bonne fin de journée à vous
grelus (2025-10-04 16:21:58+00:00): czy na pewno tam nic nie było? starotorze to również nasypy i wykopy. Stąd pozostawione linie z railway=abandoned. Usuwanie ich podchodzi pod niszczenie danych
lf22music (2025-10-04 19:02:25+00:00): Pod żadnym pozorem nie chialem nic niszczyc! Tylko jak widze jak te linie przechodza przez domy albo ulice drogi ekspresowe to nie widze sensu tego trzymac na mapie te starotorza nawet sie tam nie znajdują ani nasysypy wszystko zazwyczaj zaorane jest pozdrawiam cię trzymaj sie miłego dnia
maraf24 (2025-10-04 19:41:08+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1422240971

Rolą landuse=residential nie jest określania granic miejscowości.
A na pewno nie powinno ono obejmość takich wielkich obszarów rolnych - wszak tutaj teren zamieszkany to jest mniej niż połowa zaznaczonego obszaru.
maraf24 (2025-10-04 19:43:19+00:00): Tutaj jest przykład, jak powinien być zrobiony landuse w miejscowości: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/52.719925/17.521707
eggie (2025-08-14 08:49:43+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
omni12345 (2025-08-14 09:02:00+00:00): Dankje! Ik woon in deze wijk dus zal voornamelijk deze wijk updaten :). De wijk is in ontwikkeling met veel nieuwbouw en de aanleg van een park.
Fen <3 (2025-08-16 04:54:25+00:00): can I ask why you deleted the pet waste bag dispenser I added 3 days ago with ground truth in this changeset? (node id 13068055554)
Fen <3 (2025-08-16 19:13:42+00:00): I reverted the deletion, no worries, the park looks great! awesome work!
Nostradumbass (2025-08-17 22:57:15+00:00): Might have been an accident, I made a lot of edits to the marina in the last few days and it seems to have slipped through. I plan on visiting the marina again soonish and surveying & verifying all the dispensers/benches/tables/etc, so I might not have paid as close attention as a should have knowing I'd be fixing any missing items in the near future.
Lambig (2025-08-14 08:17:22+00:00): Erratum : correctrion suite note nº4896725
smallCat (2025-08-14 10:22:11+00:00): 你好，在中国大陆请使用简体字作为name，繁体字可以标在name:zh-Hant里
eggie (2025-08-14 08:53:06+00:00): Tip  Op een footway (wandelpad.. meestal G7 bord) hoef je niet te taggen bicycle=no . Dat is default.
Een highway=path heeft geen bebording en routeert ook voor fietsers behalve als je bicycle=no tagt.

MVG
eggie
DD1GJ (2025-08-14 08:55:20+00:00): Teilrevert 170423618, gelöschtes Gebäude wieder hergestellt, Lebenszyklus.

Hallo pinkybrain123, willkommen bei OSM. Da vermutlich nur das Restaurant geschlossen, aber das Gebäude nicht abgerissen wurde, habe ich deine Löschung rückgängig gemacht und den Eintrag angepasst. Mehr zu OSM erfährst Du unter pinkybrain123

Viele Grüße, Joachim
pinkybrain123 (2025-08-14 09:29:16+00:00): Vielen Dank Joachim. Das war nicht meine Absicht. Danke fürs korrigieren. 
MfG 
Phil
DD1GJ (2025-08-14 09:35:49+00:00): Hallo Phil,

gern geschehen. Solche Fehler passieren halt zu Beginn. Oben hatte ich den falschen Inhalt in der Zwischenablage. Gemeint war  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Viele Grüße, Joachim
eggie (2025-08-14 08:55:38+00:00): Welkom bij OSM,

Alleen een naam doet niets in OSM. Tag ook de aard van het bedrijf. Bv office=company of iets beters.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:office

MVG
eggie
user_8655426 (2025-08-14 09:24:27+00:00): Hello,
Thank you for mapping Japan.

You added some buildings, but you didn't square them.
https://osmcha.org/changesets/170424251

In the real world, most buildings have right-angled corners, so we need to reflect that on the map. But it's difficult for us to draw them freehand.

So please use the 'Q' key on your keyboard to square the corners of the building.

Common New Mapper Mistakes: Buildings not Squared or Circularized (YouTube)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o

Common New Mapper Mistakes: Connected Nodes (YouTube)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Happy Mapping!
Papa-online (2025-10-10 14:30:07+00:00): A commercially used area is not a building. See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dcommercial
pitscheplatsch (2025-08-14 19:19:43+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

Are these changes being made in coordination with the local community? 

I would appreciate a response.

Thank you.
felidaelynx (2025-08-14 19:54:05+00:00): Hi Pitscheplatsch,

I did not coordinate this with the local community. I was just enthousiastic about creating a better winter sports representation for this area

Châtel currently does not have its own skipass and so in my opinion does not represent anything.
Regarding other changes I made, the portes du soleil area did not correspond to the complete area included in the skipass and it's subarea's (mostly) did not exist
Pan (2025-08-15 07:30:52+00:00): Si c'est une propriété mais que les chemins existent, il ne faut pas les effacer mais les tagger en conséquence. Je vais réparer.