piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
McPomHH (2025-07-15 06:51:26+00:00): Die Hausnummern waren nicht abhanden gekommen. Alle 4 Gebäude bzw. alle 28 Einheiten haben die selbe Hausnummer ("1") mit einem separaten Adresszusatz (z.B. "Haus 2d").

Da dies eine wohl in Hamburg einmalige Nummerierung ist, für die es nach meinem Kenntnisstand keine klare OSM Regelung gibt, habe ich die Hausnummer jetzt (wieder) mit dem Adresszusatz versehen.
Frans S (2025-03-11 10:03:16+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
You tagged many traces as a path, despite they are wide enough for cars.
Tag traces >2 mtr wide which connect settlements as highway=unclassified +unpaved.
Traces leading to farmland, water bodies, woods are mostly to be tagged as track.
Very narrow traces are not needed to be tagged for this project
Check this wiki please
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa
Best regards.
onovy (2025-08-14 14:35:15+00:00): Ahoj,

pročpak jsi tento brownfield smazal?
syenit (2025-09-06 18:05:46+00:00): Ahoj, brownfield jsem zmapoval znovu. Místo jsem ověřil i na místě a zdá se mi že odpovídá přesně definici dle wiki. Uvedl jsem to i do poznámky. Tak snad tentokrát to tam vydrží déle.
JJIglesias (2025-03-05 07:36:52+00:00): Saludos. El nombre de Rio Callao que pusiste de donde proviene? las Cartas Topograficas del IGM marcan ese rio como Rio Bandorcito (ref 1:50k 6638-iv)

Si puedes aclarar seria de mucha ayuda.

Gracias
citrula (2025-03-03 20:57:39+00:00): Hello Zachary,

Welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contribution. tourism=apartment is for vacation rentals - you can use landuse=residential + residential=apartments instead.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:residential%3Dapartments

let me know if you have any questions
eggie (2025-03-03 20:58:20+00:00): Nee  :)

Ongewone waarde geeft de validator.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxstay

en mocht conditional nodig zijn dan hoort die in de key en niet in de waarde. 
Voorbeelden van conditional gebruik:
motor_vehicle:conditional=delivery @ (Mo-Sa 06:00-12:00; Su 07:00-13:00)
motor_vehicle:conditional=no @ (Mo – Fr 11.00 - 18.00; Sa 11.00 - 17.00; Su 12.00 - 17.00)
conditional voorbeeld:
access:conditional=no @ (sunset-sunrise)

access:conditional=no @ (2023 Sep 20-2024 Apr 3)

Of het met maxstay werkt even geen idee.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=163177472

name=name	Charging Station  moet in ieder geval ook weg.
eggie (2025-03-03 21:01:07+00:00): name en area verwijderd..

Voorbeeld wiki maxstay:conditional=1 hour @ (08:00-18:00) 

Daar zie je conditional in de key staan.. Dus links van het = teken.
eggie (2025-03-03 21:03:13+00:00): Aangepast als boven
eggie (2025-03-03 21:08:37+00:00): Hi.. I merged your info with the present addressnode.
Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2025-03-03 21:15:46+00:00): Yep... de format klopt in ieder geval zo. 
Gr eggie
Busaiolis (2025-03-04 22:55:13+00:00): Ciao, non penso che questa preferenziale vada mappata come motor_vehicle=designated.
Mehmetkeles1 (2025-03-03 21:26:20+00:00): Gaziantep Epoksi Zemin Kaplama
pitscheplatsch (2025-03-04 06:24:21+00:00): Hello, thank you for your contribution.

I noticed that some of the tags and descriptions you've used appear to be related to #SEO #spam. I recommend reading the following page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Spam

Could you please confirm if your map edits here were intentional?

#MapWithoutSpam #TagSmartNotSpam
NeisBot (2025-03-04 15:40:05+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was flagged because your added description contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2025-03-13 15:02:03+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/163574389
JJIglesias (2025-03-04 02:02:08+00:00): Slds. Estos camino highway=unclassified y los highway=track, realmente existen ya? o están en proceso de construcción o son planeados?

Ninguna de las fotos satélites en OSM o fuera de OSM muestran siquiera un highway=track previo o existente.

Por favor clarifica esta situación.

Gracias
JJIglesias (2025-03-04 02:01:10+00:00): Slds. Estos camino highway=unclassified y el highway=track, realmente existen ya? o están en proceso de construcción o son planeados?

Ninguna de las fotos satélites en OSM o fuera de OSM muestran siquiera un highway=track previo o existente.

Por favor clarifica esta situación.

Gracias
sergio_thaine (2025-03-04 14:27:14+00:00): Hola JJ Iglesias,

Gracias por tu comentario y tu interés en nuestros conjuntos de cambios. Los caminos mencionados que fueron etiquetados como "highway=unclassified" y "highway=track" son parte de un conjunto de colonias menonitas recién instaladas hace poco tiempo. Durante este tiempo, hace 9 meses aproximadamente, han trabajado en la construcción y mejora de estos caminos y accesos, los cuales tienen aproximadamente 15-20 metros de ancho y son los accesos a las casas y campos de cultivo.

Las imágenes satelitales disponibles ya muestran la existencia de estos caminos, los cuales son visibles y están en uso. Si necesitas más información o detalles específicos, no dudes en preguntar.

Gracias de nuevo por tu interés.

Saludos cordiales,
Sergio Thaine
Oscar Sergio Miranda Thaine
Especialista en Monitoreo y Manejo de Información Geográfica  SERCOFOR Consultorías
Asesor en Cambio de Uso del Suelo en Bolivia
POR LOS BOSQUES, POR LA VIDA
JJIglesias (2025-03-04 18:15:48+00:00): Saludos Sergio, podrias darme la fuente de esas imagenes satelite que mencionas donde se ven estas vias?

Porque ni siquiera hay trazas GPS que sugieran la existencia de dichos caminos en esa zona

Gracias y Saludos

JJ
sergio_thaine (2025-03-04 19:09:27+00:00): Claro que si. Las fuentes de referencia son Imagen Sentinel 2A escena 20 KRG del 22 de febrero de 2025. Imagen satelital CBERS 4 (PAN5M) 10 de dic de 2024,escena 170/118.    La fuente de campo también son los Planes de Ordenamiento Predial y Planes de Desmonte registrados en la Autoridad de Bosques y Tierras.
JJIglesias (2025-03-04 20:19:09+00:00): Gracias excelentes referencias. No tengo problemas con que se agreguen nuevas vias, al contrario, bienvenidas, pero tambien hay recelo, pues muchas veces se han agregado vias que solo se han puesto para "vender" una realidad inexistente, con propositos comerciales...

Muchas gracias por tus ediciones.
sergio_thaine (2025-03-05 03:34:16+00:00): OSM es una herramienta muy útil, siempre vamos a velar por la fidelidad de los datos. Gracias por revisar mis contribuciones. Estamos colaborando en lo que podemos.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-06-04 11:02:23+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1364363672/history has material = 2.2

What this tag means? Numeric value is unexpected here and it is unclear what it means

is it supposed to be height=2.2 ?
trigpoint (2025-03-03 21:39:28+00:00): Reverted in changeset 163178856
JJIglesias (2025-03-04 01:55:50+00:00): Slds. Ese camino highway=unclassified y el highway=track, realmente existen ya? o están en proceso de construcción o son planeados?

Ninguna de las fotos satélites en OSM o fuera de OSM muestran siquiera un highway=track previo o existente.

Por favor clarifica esta situación.

Gracias
sergio_thaine (2025-03-04 14:26:52+00:00): Hola JJ Iglesias,

Gracias por tu comentario y tu interés en nuestros conjuntos de cambios. Los caminos mencionados que fueron etiquetados como "highway=unclassified" y "highway=track" son parte de un conjunto de colonias menonitas recién instaladas hace poco tiempo. Durante este tiempo, hace 9 meses aproximadamente, han trabajado en la construcción y mejora de estos caminos y accesos, los cuales tienen aproximadamente 15-20 metros de ancho y son los accesos a las casas y campos de cultivo.

Las imágenes satelitales disponibles ya muestran la existencia de estos caminos, los cuales son visibles y están en uso. Si necesitas más información o detalles específicos, no dudes en preguntar.

Gracias de nuevo por tu interés.

Saludos cordiales,
Sergio Thaine
Oscar Sergio Miranda Thaine
Especialista en Monitoreo y Manejo de Información Geográfica  SERCOFOR Consultorías
Asesor en Cambio de Uso del Suelo en Bolivia
POR LOS BOSQUES, POR LA VIDA
JJIglesias (2025-03-04 01:51:04+00:00): Slds. Ese camino highway=unclassified, realmente existe ya? o esta en proceso de construccion o es planeado?

Ninguna de las fotos satelites en OSM o fuera de OSM muestran siquiera un highway=track previo o existente.

Por favor clarifica esta situacion.

Gracias
sergio_thaine (2025-03-04 14:26:07+00:00): Hola JJ Iglesias,

Gracias por tu comentario y tu interés en nuestros conjuntos de cambios. Los caminos mencionados que fueron etiquetados como "highway=unclassified" y "highway=track" son parte de un conjunto de colonias menonitas recién instaladas hace poco tiempo. Durante este tiempo, hace 9 meses aproximadamente, han trabajado en la construcción y mejora de estos caminos y accesos, los cuales tienen aproximadamente 15-20 metros de ancho y son los accesos a las casas y campos de cultivo.

Las imágenes satelitales disponibles ya muestran la existencia de estos caminos, los cuales son visibles y están en uso. Si necesitas más información o detalles específicos, no dudes en preguntar.

Gracias de nuevo por tu interés.

Saludos cordiales,
Sergio Thaine
Oscar Sergio Miranda Thaine
Especialista en Monitoreo y Manejo de Información Geográfica  SERCOFOR Consultorías
Asesor en Cambio de Uso del Suelo en Bolivia
POR LOS BOSQUES, POR LA VIDA
NorthCrab_upload (2025-03-03 22:01:22+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11170363477
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1364365183

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
PedroMTG13 (2025-03-05 09:32:18+00:00): Bom dia Rui.
A estação final era em frente ao forte, a linha fazia uma curva final em direção ao molhe norte de Leixões. Era Leça Praia.
rui228 (2025-03-05 20:28:52+00:00): Olá Pedro. Ao criares a linha, fiquei com a ideia que a estação ficava nessa localização. Vou apagar o nó.
PedroMTG13 (2025-03-05 20:31:54+00:00): Na altura não o sabia.
Podes redesenhar até aos carris existentes no molhe norte
NorthCrab_upload (2025-03-03 22:20:50+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1364366843

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
felipeeugenio (2025-03-04 15:16:51+00:00): Hola. Buenas tardes.
por favor con Mayúsculas cuando corresponda los nombres.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163179942
VictorIE (2025-09-02 07:23:43+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1187584815/history

Is this a Bank of Ireland non-branch office?
RedAuburn (2025-03-03 22:41:40+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4646432
Gael de Sailly (2025-03-04 18:17:30+00:00): SVP ne pas dupliquer les routes incluses dans la ligne de bus, et encore moins les indiquer en highway=trunk, cela perturbe énormément la carte.

Vous pouvez ajouter les segments de route directement dans la relation sans les dupliquer.
ralley (2025-03-03 23:28:54+00:00): Why have you tagged this section of road as a ford?  It does not match the changeset description or the aerial imagery
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163180795
rskedgell (2025-03-04 07:40:00+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for adding the building.

The ref tag on a post box refers to its unique reference number. If you wish to add its postcode, you can use the postal_code tag.

The addr:postcode is only used for addressable features on the map, which you correctly used for the building you added. For things like post boxes, postal_code is used.

I've restores the ref in
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163189209

See also:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dpost_box
https://osm.mathmos.net/postboxes/
bbqman (2025-03-03 23:36:46+00:00): source: wikimedia
bbqman (2025-03-03 23:36:34+00:00): source: wikimedia
BlauerRothirsch (2025-03-03 23:39:56+00:00): Changed the parking lot at Rewe but forgot, so the edit box is larger than necessary
joost schouppe (2025-09-29 09:16:10+00:00): I've adjusted the streetname from Allée John-Fitzgerald Kennedy to Allée John Fitzgerald Kennedy, according to the spelling in PICC. Did you have a reason to use another spelling?
Teraboll (2026-01-15 18:18:12+00:00): I don't understand why I put a - 
Probably a typo. The correct spelling is indeed Allée John Fitzgerald Kennedy
Thanks for the correction
joost schouppe (2026-01-16 10:02:59+00:00): Eh, I've seen several spellings in different places. Thanks for the confirmation!
NorthCrab_upload (2025-03-04 00:10:45+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/323888530
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/333102371

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
recrayon (2025-03-04 00:08:18+00:00): changeset 58529722
aharvey (2025-03-04 05:05:33+00:00): Looks good.
dkwolf (2025-03-04 01:13:07+00:00): When adding a nature preserve on Tinker Island, the Gulf of Maine tag was removed in error.  It say it has no feature tag.  Need help fixing. Not sure what it shoud be?
Allison P (2025-03-04 09:07:48+00:00): What is the meaning of tags gpx:name and gpxx:DisplayColor?
Jbensman (2025-03-04 13:07:40+00:00): have no ideal, I did not add them, I am just identify a name, that it is a trail and unpaved.
habi (2025-08-14 09:03:32+00:00): Meinst du ein Parking?
Das wäre mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/564773130 schon erfasst gewesen...
ARandomThumbtack (2025-03-16 14:28:46+00:00): Thank you for adding this in, your work does not go unnoticed :)
Coehill (2025-03-17 16:09:55+00:00): Thank you :)
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-17 00:42:54+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165050151
mavl (2025-05-13 15:08:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
mavl (2025-05-13 15:04:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
mavl (2025-05-13 15:04:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
Glassman (2025-03-04 22:36:51+00:00): #TIP: Street names are spelled out in OSM because software has a hard time unabbreviating.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163185207
mavl (2025-05-13 15:07:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
Baloo Uriza (2025-03-04 16:34:43+00:00): The name should only be the name.  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
Please consider lifecycle tags.  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Comparison_of_life_cycle_concepts
Street names shouldn't contain abbreviations.
access=yes means anybody can use it at any time without restriction, which isn't the case with Tesla.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163186306
TheNightRider (2025-03-05 08:43:28+00:00): I agree that ideally the name should be the name, but I tried construction:amenity=charging_station and nothing rendered differently. So, our position should be "too bad" if someone shows up to a charging station under construction because the standard OSM renderer doesn't show it as such? Is there anything in progress to address this? Many other vehicles besides Teslas now use these stations. In this case, it's not yet known if the station will be a NACS station (for any vehicle with a NACS port or adaptor) or also a MagicDock station, which does NACS + CCS Combo1.

Is that what you mean about access, because if the station supports NACS or CCS Combo1, anyone can show up and use the station without restriction. Of course, they have to pay. Is payment the restriction you're referring to. Please clarify.
TheNightRider (2025-03-05 09:21:33+00:00): In reading https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Dcustomers

Similar to paid hotel parking for hotel customers only, would the correct taggin then be:
access=customers
fee=yes
Thanks!
TheNightRider (2025-03-29 21:15:08+00:00): Hey Baloo Uriza, after seeing dimmed rendering of "Electrify America" and "Tesla Supercharger" after adding both stations in Lordsburg, NM, I really dug in to the question of whether publicly available EV charging stations should be tagged access=customers or access=yes.

access=customers is problematic and to clearly see the problem, consider a grocery store. If a grocery store open to the public was tagged access=customer, that wouldn't make any sense because anyone can enter, even before they are a customer. The store is open to anyone willing to pay for groceries. Once you pay, you become a customer. So a grocery store open to the public should be tagged access=yes .

The same is true for EV chargers open to the public. Access is open to any person willing to pay (and of course have the correct plug or adapter), so they should be tagged access=yes.

This is confirmed at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access , which on the "customers" line says, "Only for customers/visitors of the associated feature, such as a shop or tourist facility. If access is open to any person willing to pay, consider using fee=yes (+access=yes) instead."

Also, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access=customers says "access=customers applies to features which may be used or accessed only by customers of a specific facility such as a shop or restaurant." That is clearly not the case with most EV chargers. You don't have to buy something at Target to use the Electrify America or Tesla chargers out front.

Thanks for your other best practice recommendations, such as the construction tagging scheme and not abbreviating street names. All the best!
Baloo Uriza (2025-03-29 22:21:45+00:00): If you have to sign into an app and/or have a pre-existing account to use it, then that's not access=yes at all.  access=yes would mean I can walk up with a credit card or cash and plug in without any sort of drama, which just isn't the case here.
TheNightRider (2025-03-29 22:50:07+00:00): I've never heard of cash at any EV charging, though I haven't used all brands. EVgo, Electrify America, ChargePoint, Tesla: they all do credit cards or apps, and sometimes NFC or RFID cards (ChargePoint for sure uses RFID). But payment is not what the access tag is for. Payment schemes are separately tagged. As I quoted in the OSM docs, access is all about who can use it. All of the charging companies allow anyone, with a few exceptions like chargers on the property of companies that have fleet charging. If you're talking about drama, try using Electrify America or Francis Energy, if you can even make them work. Rivian is reportedly good, as is Tesla, which has the least drama of anyone because they actually pay people to keep their system up. They got the station in MA up in 48 hrs after an arsonist torched it.
TheNightRider (2025-03-29 22:52:12+00:00): Do you own or operate an EV? I'm getting the impression that you don't.
TheNightRider (2025-03-29 22:58:41+00:00): I just asked ChatGPT, which of course isn't omniscient, this question: Do any EV chargers in the US take cash?

In the US, most electric vehicle (EV) chargers typically don’t accept cash directly. Instead, they rely on digital payment methods, such as credit/debit cards, mobile apps, or subscriptions to networks like Tesla Superchargers, ChargePoint, or Electrify America.

However, there are some chargers at locations like gas stations or convenience stores that may accept cash at the point of sale, where you could load money onto a card or pay at the pump to use the charging service. Some networks also allow payment through app-based services or by using RFID cards tied to a payment method.
TheNightRider (2025-03-29 23:00:13+00:00): Then I asked Grok the same question and it said:

As of now, EV chargers in the US generally do not accept cash directly at the charging stations. Unlike traditional gas stations where cash payments are common, most public EV charging infrastructure relies on digital payment methods. This is largely due to the design and operation of charging stations, which are often unattended and equipped with systems that process payments via credit/debit cards, mobile apps, RFID cards, or contactless options like Apple Pay or Google Wallet.

Major charging networks like Electrify America, ChargePoint, and Tesla Superchargers typically require payment through their respective apps or contactless card readers. For example, Electrify America stations display pricing on the charger screen and allow payment via their app or contactless cards, but there’s no mechanism for cash transactions. Similarly, ChargePoint stations often require an account linked to a payment method, and Tesla Superchargers bill directly to the user’s Tesla account, which is tied to a credit card.

There are rare exceptions where cash might be accepted indirectly. For instance, some charging stations located at businesses like convenience stores or gas stations might allow you to prepay with cash inside the store, after which the attendant activates the charger for you. However, this is not a standard feature of EV chargers themselves and depends on the specific location and operator. Discussions on platforms like Reddit have suggested ideas like prepaid cards purchasable with cash at retail locations, but no widespread implementation of this exists yet in the US.

The shift away from cash is partly practical—adding cash-handling hardware to chargers increases costs and maintenance, and digital payments align with the tech-driven nature of EVs. Additionally, regulations like the 2020 US government mandate for new rapid chargers to accept contactless card payments have further prioritized card-based systems over cash.

So, while you won’t typically find EV chargers in the US that take cash directly, certain locations might offer workarounds through on-site staff. For the most part, you’ll need a card or app to charge up.
Baloo Uriza (2025-03-29 23:00:38+00:00): I wouldn't exactly call requiring a pre-existing customer relationship in order to use it as open to the public.