piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
GSF1200S (2023-10-12 00:39:17+00:00): There is no difference between the two expressions. It is my personal preference to stick to the current wiki.  It may be better for you the change the wiki insead of telling people what to do and what not to do all over the place, while others' works  have not voilated the rules.
Kovoschiz (2023-10-12 05:27:13+00:00): Yes there is. `substance=` is widely used and supported. Using `pumping_station=` prevents it from being used for other purposes. 
You are the one changing it meaninglessly. I'm telling you why not to. There's no "rules". Doing something "wrong" is not the only reason for receiving comments. 
Wiki is not for personal opinions either. 
And you haven't considered `pipeline=substation`.
Kovoschiz (2023-10-12 06:45:07+00:00): I'm not "telling you what to do". It's a notification that you can ignore if you wish. Don't complain when I change it back that is.
MxxCon (2023-10-04 22:38:25+00:00): Hello.
Please note that this is incorrect way to tag a playground splash pad. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:playground#Water_devices
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142075713
Brazil Singh (2025-08-05 15:25:37+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/223101282

This is wrongly tagged footover bridge.  There is a footover bridge but tag is wrong
Brazil Singh (2025-08-05 15:32:11+00:00): Actually Tagging is ok but it should be connected with the path
rhtb0 (2023-10-03 04:40:24+00:00): JHK Field
Ju'family Grave
이 이름들은 개인정보 아닌가요? 영어로 번역해도 뜻은 알겠습니다. 개인적인 정보는 지도에 반영해봤자 지도에 데이터로서 아무런 의미가 없습니다. 이런것을 넣으면 지도의 지형지물로서의 가치가 없고 개인정보만 유출됩니다.
rhtb0 (2023-10-03 04:42:55+00:00): https://medium.com/seoul-libre-maps/%EB%94%94%EC%A7%80%ED%84%B8-%EC%A7%80%EB%8F%84%EC%99%80-%EC%98%A4%ED%94%88%EB%8D%B0%EC%9D%B4%ED%84%B0%EB%A5%BC-%EB%B0%94%EB%9D%BC%EB%B3%B4%EB%8A%94-%EB%AA%87-%EA%B0%80%EC%A7%80-%EA%B4%80%EC%A0%90-76a4bd411168
편집자의 사심이 지나치게 보이며, 전세계인 모두의 막네 삼촌네가 아닌 이상, 이러한 데이터는 지형지물로서의 의미가 없다
Frans S (2023-10-03 12:07:01+00:00): Hello again.
Also. well mapped. 
When you see a building without roof, tag it as building= construction, or (when obvious) as ruin.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142077412
Faheem Chui (2023-10-04 04:50:31+00:00): Thank you very much. I will tag construction buildings with a tag as building = contruction.   Best Reagrds
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142077412
Kai Johnson (2024-12-03 20:50:48+00:00): I think this may be the "Roach Valley Reservoir" or that's possibly an alternative name. https://greybullvalleyid.com/reservoir-levels/
Kai Johnson (2024-12-03 20:51:22+00:00): Oops. "Roach Gulch Reservoir"
watmildon (2024-12-04 02:47:51+00:00): Seems reasonable. Would you like to make the edit (and take the glory?) or shall I?
Kai Johnson (2024-12-04 17:54:08+00:00): I decided to keep Greybull as the primary name and add Roach Gulch as the alt name to align with NID. We'll have to see what GNIS says. I suspect they'll want someone to make an official name submission rather than picking up the name from another government organization.
Glassman (2023-10-03 17:51:39+00:00): I'm curious why you removed the driveway. They appear on the latest imagery. and are still in King County's database. Can you explain why you removed them? I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142077696
morpheusmac (2023-10-03 18:55:23+00:00): The driveway is a permeable surface unsuitable for vehicular travel.  Most of the mapped "driveway" cannot be accessed without traveling on private property.  None of the driveway is listed on King County GIS roadway mapping.  Listing this as a driveway is resulting in commercial and private vehicles getting stuck in unmaintained surfaces unsuitable for vehicular traffic with vehicles attempting to back up hills driving over fences, running over trees and brush, resulting in property damage and tow bills and trespassing onto private property.
https://gismaps.kingcounty.gov/iMap/
47.76308 -122.30818
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142077696
Glassman (2023-10-03 23:07:13+00:00): Sorry - I didn't mean the driveway was mapped, just that it appears in their imagery. 

Driveways are typically on private property and are considered private unless shared with neighbors. And then it is still private for those neighbors.

OSM is a place where objects that can be ground-truthed can be added.  The only exception is for objects that are temporary like a ship docked to be unloaded.

I respectfully request that you added the driveways back.
morpheusmac (2023-10-04 00:42:17+00:00): Respectfully, I decline.  OSM is utilized to create mapping programs for several large tech companies.  These mapping programs create the issue at hand. The permeable surface identified by you as a driveway is no longer safely accessible to vehicles from any roadway and thus no longer meets the definition of a driveway, hence their removal.
Glassman (2023-10-04 02:32:06+00:00): No problem. However, please keep an eye on your area. Anyone can easily add it back. With well over a million contributors, it can happen.
pitfire (2023-10-03 05:20:22+00:00): Hallo Ra_colate,

der Weg: 87975538, v3 ist nicht "covered" sondern der vom Gebäude abgedeckte Teil ist mit dem Attribut tunnel=building_passage zu versehen.

VG pitfire
Ra_colate (2023-10-04 12:41:27+00:00): Hi pitfire
Thank you for the feedback, corrected the data based on your feedback.
pitfire (2023-10-03 05:09:33+00:00): Hallo Ra_colate,

der Wegverlauf: 1212662756 ist weder "cutting" noch ist der Weg: 87975545 auf gesamter Länge "covered". Der Weg sollte geschnitten werden und als "tunnel=building_passage" erfasst werden! 
VG pitfire
Ra_colate (2023-10-04 12:41:40+00:00): Hi pitfire
Thank you for the feedback, corrected the data based on your feedback.
Langlaeufer (2023-10-03 07:57:03+00:00): Hallo hockie,
die Richtungsangaben auf Einbahnstraßen sind überflüssig, sofern sie sich nicht auf die Gegenrichtung beziehen (z.b. für Ausnahmen wie Radfahrer)
Grüße
Langläufer
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142077970
hockie (2023-10-03 14:16:29+00:00): Hallo Langläufer,
im OSM-Wiki steht davon nichts.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway=give%20way?uselang=de
JOSM markiert den Node mit einem orangenem Kästchen, als Hinweis das dort was fehlt/falsch ist.
Wie ich gerade lediglich im englischen Wiki gelesen habe, steht da dass sich das Schild auf die nächstgelegene Kreuzung bezieht.
Grüße
Hockie
Langlaeufer (2023-10-03 16:24:32+00:00): O.k.( osmose macht durchaus auch  komische Fehlermeldungen) 
Das mit der nächsten Kreuzung ist neu für mich ( gut das wir drüber gesprochen haben) aber vermutlich auch nicht immer so einfach ermittelbar, wie man im ersten Moment  glauben mag.

Grüße Langläufer
Frans S (2023-10-03 09:37:00+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 
Where clearly visible, add courtyards, please.
This is how to map a building with courtyards.

 1   Draw the outer outline of the building as an area. Tag as a building
 2  Draw each of the inner courtyards/plazas as areas. Tag as needed, or not at all
 3  Hold 'SHIFT' and select all the areas
 4  Press 'C' to create a multipolygon with all the areas
Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142079478
qadryanthony (2023-10-03 19:34:59+00:00): https://www.contracostamosquito.com/spraying_2023.htm
citrula (2023-10-03 07:34:24+00:00): Hi wesnovak, this is not how building entrances are marked on OSM. The building needs to be drawn first, and then you can add a entrance node to the building outline. Please read the wiki page about entrances: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:entrance
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142080088
bob3bob3 (2023-10-23 23:20:35+00:00): You asked for a review. I was doing some Sofala work and noticed. Am surprised that there is a park that looks like a private farm, however pit toilets are created as (amenity) nodes or buildings as a separate object, sometimes within a park. Feel free to msg me for any assists. cheers
julcnx (2023-10-04 03:10:02+00:00): Hi there! Thank you for your contributions! Just a friendly tip for next time, it's a good practice to save and upload your changes before moving on to the next area. You can find more information on changesets and their geographical size at: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
BurswoodCanal (2023-10-05 09:13:23+00:00): Hi julcnx, thanks for catching this! My intention was to keep these edits as separate changesets but it appears I have uploaded them together. I appreciate the information and will be mindful of this going forward. Happy Mapping!
bob3bob3 (2023-10-23 23:15:00+00:00): Werri or Warri? I have stopped there a few times. Note that an area/way already exists for this camp area.. cheers
dmfr (2024-07-10 19:59:13+00:00): Olá! Sabes porque é que a way 75489566 (Rua Grão Vasco) está com access=permissive?
Tomas_J (2023-10-05 21:09:42+00:00): Ahoj,

pozadoval si skontrolovat tvoju sadu zmien. 

Za mna: skvela praca. Most nevidim na Ortofotomozaike SR z rokov 2020-2022, predpokladam teda ze je uplne novy. Poloha sa zhoduje so Stravou (aj ked  stopa v Strave je zatial slaba).

Dakujem, ze sa podielas na zlepseni mapy Openstreetmap. Pokracuj v mapovani a ak by si mal akekolvek otazky, mozes napisat do diskusnej skupiny https://groups.google.com/g/osm_sk.

Tomas
mueschel (2023-10-15 15:10:17+00:00): Hallo,
bitte schau nochmal in die Doku der parking-Tags. 
"parking:lane:parallel" lässt sich nicht ersetzen durch "parking:parallel"
MichaelFS (2023-10-16 06:35:59+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis und Deine Korrektur, werde ich zukünftig berücksichtigen.
adiatmad (2023-10-05 02:36:57+00:00): Hello! Your edits are looking good. However, there's a little room for improvement, such as fixing descriptive name : name=Building (3), name=Mosque (1), name=Pond (1); Bridge is missing layer tag (1); Building has layer tag (5). Happy mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142082972
user_17222985 (2023-10-03 06:46:40+00:00): також додана церква греко католиків
nevw (2023-10-04 03:15:15+00:00): Hi
can you reference your changes to the highway tag to this guidelines
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Roads
I don't do much main road mapping but I these seem odd Majestic Drive, Regal Court , Woodlake Avenue.
s_hietsch (2024-06-05 16:29:39+00:00): I don't believe the Gouliot caves are located here. From my time on the island I know it to be on the west coast of Big Sark.
Also see: https://rsis.ramsar.org/ris/2276
Stalker61 (2023-10-03 13:26:20+00:00): Здравствуйте.
Эта правка будет отменена. Все подобные правки также будут отменены.
Так делать нельзя. Проводите полигональную границу у НП с тегами place=* + name=*
Stalker61 (2023-10-03 13:28:09+00:00): Если таковые отсутствуют. А они уже внесены в базу.
Бердникова (2023-10-03 13:47:19+00:00): Добрый день! Что именно нельзя делать?
Разделить дорогу нельзя?
Stalker61 (2023-10-03 14:27:14+00:00): На вей улицы пишется имя собственное "улица Ленина", "Трудовая улица" и ставится тег highway=*
Stalker61 (2023-10-03 14:30:43+00:00): Названия маршрутов не есть имя собственное. У вас и редактор дурниной кричит от таких правок.
Для маршрута необходимо создавать отношения https://openstreetmap.org/relation/189406, где "Волга" и есть имя собственное. Его и вносят на вей автодороги. Вы вообще wiki не пробовали почитать?
Stalker61 (2023-10-03 14:31:51+00:00): Или вот такое отношение https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13396954
Stalker61 (2023-10-03 14:32:51+00:00): Таковы правила проекта, а не моя личная хотелка.
Stalker61 (2023-10-03 14:35:06+00:00): Просто людям надоест исправлять подобную отсебятину и будет массовый откат ваших правок. Обидно правда. Но, скорее всего, так и будет.
Stalker61 (2023-10-03 14:42:35+00:00): Вот ссылка на одну из региональных тем форума, где в кратце собраны ссылки на wiki для ознакомления с процессом маппинга и принятия в работу - https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/topic/56721
Stalker61 (2023-10-03 14:53:29+00:00): И еще одно огорчение для вас. Вей улицы не должен выходить за полигональную границу НП обозначенную тегом place=*. Все, что за пределами этого полигона является автодорогами различного класса. :(
Бердникова (2023-10-04 05:54:32+00:00): Добрый день! Не стоит путать дороги федерального и регионального значения, где названия звучат по-иному. По большому счету дороги местного значения - это дороги в деревнях,  и в утвержденном реестре дорог и по паспортам дорог они звучат, как а/д "д.Сидоровская", "д.Горка-Муравьевская" и пр.
Бердникова (2023-10-04 05:56:17+00:00): Границы дорог отмечаю там, где в паспортах стоит начало и конец. И если границы выходят за пределы населенного пункта, то как в таком случае быть?
Бердникова (2023-10-04 05:56:59+00:00): Вносить информацию придется в любом случае так, как она отображена у нас в паспортах и программе СКДФ, чтобы не было разногласий.
Бердникова (2023-10-04 05:57:17+00:00): Описания больше добавлять не стану.
Stalker61 (2023-10-04 07:29:34+00:00): На OSM требования и юрисдикция СКДФ не распространяются. При регистрации в ресурсе вы приняли на себя обязательство соблюдать установленные правила проекта. Будьте так добры соблюдать эти обязательства и уважать членов сообщества.
Stalker61 (2023-10-04 07:33:08+00:00): И пожалуйста не аргументируйте статусом автодорог федерального и регионального значения. Требования проекта распространяются абсолютно для всех, включая и муниципальные.
Stalker61 (2023-10-04 07:36:55+00:00): Для подобных бюрократических случаев принят тег official_name=*
А вам просто хочется видеть лубную картинку. Так проблем то нет. Предложите СКДФ поднять локальный сервер, закачать туда любую подложку и можете там рисовать хоть все под Хохлому.
Stalker61 (2023-10-04 07:38:08+00:00): И прочитайте хоть что-то о правилах проекта. А то общаешься как в том анекдоте про слепого и глухого.
Stalker61 (2023-10-04 07:42:44+00:00): Поделитесь с сообществом своей точкой зрения.
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/topic/49254/4281
eggie (2023-10-03 08:57:43+00:00): Yep.. Nu klopt het wel.
Op 1 building_passage staat nog layer=-1  Dat kan weg. Het is gewoon maaiveldhoogte.
decline ken ik niet als osm tag... wel incline=up of down (ligt aan de richting ) of inderdaad  het percentage.  Maar in dat laatste geval dus incline=10%
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:incline#On_ways
Mapse
eggie
eggie (2023-10-03 08:58:34+00:00): Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=142085009
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-10-03 10:07:16+00:00): OSM to nie jest ślepe odbicie urzędniczej klasyfikacji dróg

Jest też np. DW która jest highway=service
Awoobis (2023-10-03 12:52:52+00:00): https://pl.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Droga_wojew%C3%B3dzka_nr_219

Nie wykorzystujemy urzędniczych klasyfikacji tylko tych "w terenie" / wg. Wiki
f_husni (2024-10-14 04:53:32+00:00): hallo. ingin bertanya terkait way/578283583 kenapa mba menambahkan tag tambahan service=alley https://osm.mapki.com/history/way/578283583  mengapa tidak merubah klasifikasi jalan nya menjadi living street? karena way id tersebut terdeteksi sebagai conflict tag. terimakasih
arjunaraoc (2024-01-08 14:47:06+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142086308
paunofu (2023-10-03 07:48:04+00:00): https://www.alcoi.org/export/sites/default/es/areas/medi_ambient/descargas/Acord_noms_ViaVerda_Alcoi.pdf
empty_child (2023-10-03 09:08:51+00:00): Reverted (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142090384)
baldwald (2023-10-03 08:19:56+00:00): Hallo, Dank für die Hilfe. Wünsche: Obstallee ist nicht Wald sondern eher Wiese. Einzelne markante Bäume sind jetzt gar nicht mehr sichtbar - wäre aber schön. Wie mache ich das? Und eine Bezeichnung der "Wege" (in der Tatd sind es keine offiziellen Wege sondern Trampelfade mit Waldboden als Fläche) wäre schon gut. Wie soll ich es machen? Gruss Ulrich Reinhardt, Bremen
OSM_RogerWilco (2023-10-03 12:56:24+00:00): Grundsätzlich muss man wissen, dass OpenStreetMap in erster Linie eine Datenbank ist. Aus diesen Daten können dann unter anderem auch Karten erzeugt werden. Die Karten, die man auf www.openstreetmap.org z.B. sehen kann sind eher als eine Art Demo zu verstehen. Eine Beispielkarte. Je nach Zweck der Karte entscheidet der jeweilige Kartenhersteller, ob und wie was auf der Karte dargestellt wird. Daher haben wir als Mapper da keinen Einfluss darauf. Außer man verbiegt absichtlich die Daten, damit man bei einer bestimmten Karte eine bestimmte Darstellung erzielt. Das wird bei OSM aber nicht gerne gesehen und als Fehler korrigiert. Es gibt aber Projekte wie "umap" bei denen man seine eigenen Karten recht einfach mit OSM-Daten erstellen kann. Vielleicht ist das interessant:
https://umap.openstreetmap.de/de/

Anleitung bei Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZohcuwWMi3c

Ist die Obstallee eine Streuobstwiese?
Mashin (2023-10-04 12:46:52+00:00): Hi,
I would like to ask for more information about this tagging campaign. What is the meaning of hgvtrimble=delivery tag? And also, was this editing efforts somewhere discussed or documented?
Thank you
vamsisai (2023-11-13 12:04:41+00:00): Hi Mashin, 
Thank you for taking the time to look over the changeset. 
These tags are applicable only for our internal edits, however owing to a technical error they got published on OSM.
We have identified all the changesets belonging to these tags added by the editors and have deleted the incorrect attributes/syntax in the changesets #141790368 ,#141790142 & #141790274. We apologize for this error and will be cautious while contributing on OSM.

Regards,
vamsisai
Mashin (2023-11-13 14:08:46+00:00): Hi vamsisai, thanks for getting back to me and also thank you for fixing the edits. 
Cheers
Mashin
empty_child (2023-10-03 09:08:48+00:00): Reverted (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142090384)
empty_child (2023-10-03 09:08:46+00:00): Reverted (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142090384)
ivanbranco (2023-10-03 09:51:57+00:00): Ciao Magicfuma,

qua hai collegate degli edifici alla strada. Questo non é possibile (le strade su OSM rappresentano la metá della carreggiata, é impossibile che un lato dell'edificio sia in mezzo alla carreggiata). Questo secondo me é successo perché hai spostato gli edifici facendo riferimento al tetto, mentre in realtá si dovrebbero spostare in riferimento alla base (come erano mappati prima). Vedi anche: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Roof_modelling
eggie (2023-10-03 13:44:57+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
phoenixsaigon1698 (2023-10-09 03:31:32+00:00): Hi, GrabVN_QThoai, Please check your tag of the relation 16413675. Here is the guideline https://labs.mapbox.com/mapping/adding-turn-restrictions/.
In a time-based turn restriction, there is only "restriction:conditional" and ZERO  another "restriction". Another thing to check again is "except = motorcar".
phoenixsaigon1698 (2023-10-11 08:34:12+00:00): Please help me to check again this one. Is this a time-based no_left_turn for car or for motorcycle?
adiatmad (2023-10-05 02:25:06+00:00): Hi again, after the hashtags make sure to add a description of what you did in this changeset. For example: Added a new residential road while fixing another road to better align with the imagery. Best practices can be found on the OSM Wiki here (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments). Cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142088602
empty_child (2023-10-03 09:08:43+00:00): Reverted (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142090384)
WoodWoseWulf (2023-10-04 08:05:59+00:00): Hi MHN toronto 2023, welcome to OSM. Please do not add fictional features to the map as they will be removed, wasting everyone's time.
GEO ECLA (2023-10-06 09:34:03+00:00): Tag landuse à utiliser uniquement sur des surfaces d'après le wiki. Corrigé.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142088640
adiatmad (2023-10-05 02:22:03+00:00): Hi there! I noticed your review request, and I've made some adjustments to your edits (https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=142168543). Also, just a friendly reminder: don't forget to press Q to square the buildings when possible. Keep up the great mapping work, and happy mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142088645
YomanNH (2024-04-23 09:00:46+00:00): Zerkniesz? https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4211116
Sandal man (2023-10-03 14:11:56+00:00): Hello,
Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-)
But please make smalle change sets, this helps others in tracking changes. 
Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thank you.
dieterdreist (2023-10-03 17:04:17+00:00): thank you, I’ll be more careful next time to avoid big bounding boxes. I rarely perform this kind of “gardening” anyway. Have fun mapping
Dimacn (2023-10-03 16:56:01+00:00): Можно узнать причину удаления ограничения скорости?
empty_child (2023-10-03 13:21:34+00:00): Reverted (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142101144)
Lostmonkey (2024-10-16 19:34:07+00:00): Kan det passe, at adgang for Kollerupvej (1212697260) er "vehicle=no"? Dvs. også for cykler. Eller er det kun "motor_vehicle=no"?
Lennardderudder (2023-10-05 08:47:51+00:00): The residential road and path called Ooievaarpad you added, are these already in place or are they proposed to be added in the future?
eggie (2023-10-05 09:13:45+00:00): Hi,

It's a brandnew path with two bridges. It's finished. 
I just corrected the streetname according the BGT/Kadaster. 

https://www.verbeterdekaart.nl/#?geometry.x=90320.98&geometry.y=466089.47&zoomlevel=14.84

Outside the Netherlands it's not allowed to see this link.Perhaps a problem for you? 
https://www.satellietdataportaal.nl/?base=openstreetmap&res=0.3%2C0.5&datemin=05-10-2022&loc=52.17923%2C4.441030%2C19z&overlay=mos-0&marker=loc&acqdate=2023-09-10&acqid=20230910_105010_PNEO-03_1_1&sensor=Pleiades-NEO



Greetz,
eggie
watmildon (2024-05-13 21:50:42+00:00): Beautiful work!!
Benoît C MdP (2023-10-16 13:44:22+00:00): Bonjour Florent,

Pourquoi une bande cyclable à contresens côté droit ? Je n'ai jamais vu ça nul par en France. Serait ce une erreur de contribution ?

Bonne continuation

Benoît
Benoît C MdP (2023-10-16 13:46:56+00:00): Il s'agit de https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/19877754
FlorentParisCentre (2023-10-16 13:57:18+00:00): Oui bien sûr, j'ai corrigé.