piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
bxl-forever (2026-03-28 00:49:45+00:00): Hello, SouthWestTrains1.

The bounding box of this changeset is fairly large, because you (inadvertently) modified the coastline.  It looks like a mistake, which we’ve just fixed.

I am concerned about quality issues with this edit.  I know that buildings in England may have surprising geometries but it looks like a collection of hand-drawn trapezes, as if you were bored after adding a few dozens houses and continued mapping.  Also, please observe that buildings on OSM should never overlap… yet, there are several dozens of cases where you drew buildings crossing other buildings: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1492681479
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1492681414
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1492681415
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1492681418
+22 others.

Please take some time to review your edit and adjust the mistakes.
MappingMore (2026-03-26 14:04:08+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:180455649
eggie (2026-03-25 14:48:57+00:00): Dag Hm 'k Vraag me af of dit allemaal wel goed is gegaan en waarom al die lementen in een relatie moeten.
Zie ook foutmelding warnings:crossing_ways:building-building 	
Dat gebouw rendert niet meer.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-03-25 14:52:00+00:00): Ik heb in ieder geval building=yes teruggezet zodat het gebouw weer rendert.
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:41:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321487 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Kosovo
Taya_S (2026-03-25 14:12:42+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180409558
rodolfovargas (2026-03-26 13:34:52+00:00): Buenos aportes. Los pisos de los edificios (building:levels), es mejor obtenerlos con trabajo de campo, o vuelo fotogramétrico UAV-DRON. 
Continua aportando.
rodolfovargas (2026-03-26 13:36:39+00:00): Considera aplicar criterios de fotointerpretación. Los edificios por lo feneral son geometricos rectangulares. No te guies por la perspectiva del edificio, las sombras o los techos.
Continua colaborando.
MappingMore (2026-03-26 08:56:36+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:180443099
MappingMore (2026-03-27 01:57:52+00:00): Partially Revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180407765
eggie (2026-03-25 14:42:34+00:00): Dag Gerben. Beter geen wegen plakken aan de landuse = industrial

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-03-25 14:44:56+00:00): P Burgmanstraat losgemaakt van landuse
WaffleR_zero (2026-03-25 14:10:32+00:00): Hotel 105
iandees (2026-03-25 14:30:00+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2085927145 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180410347, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
NeisBot (2026-03-25 14:18:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 12 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1417644862 v1 | 4 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1417644861 v1 | 3 crossings
https://osm.org/way/120063553 v23 | 3 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/11140127807 v3
https://osm.org/node/8258245164 v3

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180409713
iandees (2026-03-25 14:30:07+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11140127807 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180410357, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
Tomas Straupis (2026-03-25 16:56:04+00:00): Visos šitos žolės nėra žemėnauda todėl yra beveik nulinės vertės objektai, kurie anksčiau ar vėliau bus sutvarkyti (ištrinti). Tikrai siūlyčiau geriau apsižiūrėti dėl realaus įvedamų duomenų pritaikomumo. Tas pats su neegzistuojančiais „parkingais“. Nes na gi sugaištas laikas, o mes visą šitą ištrinsim...
eggie (2026-03-25 14:39:53+00:00): Hoi,
Organic is geen ideale app. Ik heb je info samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode.

MVG
eggie
AndyB_66 (2026-03-25 16:30:09+00:00): "Zmiana informacji" to nie jest właściwy komentarz zestawu zmian: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
MappingMore (2026-03-27 01:50:31+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:180481664
rajdhani (2026-03-29 01:49:53+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:180564417
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:07:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:11:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:10:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
Tomas Straupis (2026-03-25 17:01:12+00:00): Pakeitimas atšauktas, nes neatitinka realių duomenų.
tguen (2026-04-07 02:33:14+00:00): reverted due to quality issues

portland plaza didn't need fixing, you just don't know what correct mapping looks like
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:10:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
Tomas Straupis (2026-03-25 17:02:20+00:00): Atšauktas dėl tų pačių priežasčių, kaip ir kiti.
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:10:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
Tomas Straupis (2026-03-25 17:06:11+00:00): Šitas pakeitimas apskritai nesąmonė, kaip gyvenamas plotas išvis gali būti pieva? Atšaukiu kaip ir daug kitų.
MINGTIANZHIHOU (2026-03-26 07:54:17+00:00): This changeset was reverted due to mapping fictitious features.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180440857
ajmat (2026-03-26 08:02:14+00:00): Reverted in changeset id: 180441035
kylor (2026-03-25 18:06:45+00:00): I have been reviewing your changesets, and noticed you are not learning how to do things right before doing them. I urge you to take caution with every edit because you risk getting all your changesets reverted if they are deemed more harmful then necessary. Edit accuracy is always a thousand times more important then edit quantity. This is not a playground and people take this serious, and your edits have real effect. The wiki has helpful resources, and the osm discord has channels where you can reach out if you have questions. We aren't trying to punish you, and we realize you are just trying to help. But if you don't know the correct way to do something, either don't do it or reach out. Also I urge you to respond to changeset comments, I saw a few trying to help you out. Communicating with other mappers in the area is very important.
Aethonatic (2026-03-27 21:24:50+00:00): Hello, I've reverted this and another related changeset as these use Google as their source, which is not allowed on OpenStreetMap. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google on why exactly that is the case.
NeisBot (2026-03-25 15:21:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13678977669 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Massage center"
---
Par exemple, une version plus neutre et factuelle de ton texte pourrait être : "Centre de massage"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-02 16:33:04+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180777125
(Delete spam tags. First version)
MINGTIANZHIHOU (2026-03-26 07:50:59+00:00): This changeset was reverted due to mapping fictitious features.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180440748
TheNightRider (2026-03-31 10:25:47+00:00): Where's the kidney? :)
weblogdryads (2026-03-31 15:00:44+00:00): Kidney Care center… should of been more specific
TheNightRider (2026-03-31 17:59:27+00:00): That's cool. I had no clue. Thanks!
weblogdryads (2026-05-20 23:27:51+00:00): no problem
mueschel (2026-03-28 10:10:27+00:00): Hi,
what's the meaning of 'sp_skyway_br'? Is this some kind of official reference number?
ajmat (2026-03-26 11:32:58+00:00): Reverted in changeset id: 180449239
NeisBot (2026-03-25 15:36:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 12 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/767321839 v7 | 6 crossings
https://osm.org/way/767323609 v3 | 6 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/7164420415 v4

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180413158
Wildsharky (2026-03-29 12:29:08+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:180440309
NeisBot (2026-03-25 15:39:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13679096725 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Law firm office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-04-02 16:33:08+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/180544321
trial (2026-03-27 21:49:54+00:00): Bonjour, ces informations osnt incohérentes et/ou inutiles :
highway	living_street
maxspeed	20
maxspeed:type	FR:urban
Ville de Lorient
zone:maxspeed	FR:30

Voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:highway%3Dliving_street
trial (2026-03-27 21:44:07+00:00): Bonjour, foot=yes n'a pas d'intérêt pour highway=pedestrian, c'est évidemment la valeur par défaut
Alpha Basic Lab (2026-03-25 15:47:59+00:00): Added Alpha basic lab in sirsa haryana
MINGTIANZHIHOU (2026-03-26 06:55:01+00:00): This changeset was reverted due to mapping fictitious features.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180438965
MINGTIANZHIHOU (2026-03-26 06:55:02+00:00): This changeset was reverted due to mapping fictitious features.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180438965
daganzdaanda (2026-03-28 23:32:09+00:00): Hi nochmal,

die 22 sind höchstwahrscheinlich wieder die Leistung. Das deutet auf einen Wechselstromlader hin, der häufigste Typ ist "type2"
Also:
socket:type2=2
socket:type2:output=22 kW

"type2" wird nur verwendet, wenn das Ladegerät nur die Buchse hat, also kein festes Kabel dran hängt. Falls ein Kabel mit Stecker dran ist, nimmt man "type2_cable"
Feldwegheizer (2026-03-29 08:30:00+00:00): Hi,
danke. Schaue ich mir an. Ja ist Typ 2 mit 22kW und für 2 Fahrzeuge.
compulsiveliar (2026-03-25 16:16:16+00:00): Refined location: behind guardrail.
Corrected camera facing to south.
rodolfovargas (2026-03-26 00:07:19+00:00): Los LOTES mapea con: place=plot. Los lotes no aplica nombre=terreno. Para esta tarea solo trabajamos EDIFICIOS.
Continua aportando.
daganzdaanda (2026-03-28 23:25:48+00:00): Hi koni,

Cool, dass du auch Ladestationen einträgst.
Der iD-Editor hat da irgendwie nicht die beste Vorlage...
Schau mal auf https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station
für die ganzen Tags.

Kurzfassung: 
capacity=2 ist OK, wenn 2 gleichzeitig laden 
können (capacity:charging wird eher auf Parkplätzen verwendet)

Die 50 sind wahrscheinlich die Leistung in kW.
Ich vermute, dass es sich um zwei Stecker vom Typ CCS Combo 2 handelt (siehe auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:socket:* ), dann wäre das tagging:

socket:type2_combo=2
socket:type2_combo:output=50 kW

Es könnte aber auch ein anderer Steckertyp (Chademo?) sein, da muss man genauer hinschauen.
compulsiveliar (2026-03-25 16:10:31+00:00): Refined location.
Corrected camera facing to north.
silversurfer83 (2026-03-25 19:10:52+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap :)

Danke, dass du hilfst die Datenbank aktuell zu halten.

Zu dieser Änderung ein Hinweis und eine Frage:

Du hast den von dir bearbeiteten Abschnitt jetzt auf access=no gesetzt, was bedeutet, dass der Weg für niemanden nutzbar ist. 

Ich vermute jetzt mal, dass es irgendwo eine Barriere gibt. Von der L3078 kommend sehe ich auf einem Bild von 2020 das VZ250+Anlieger Frei + Sackgasse (letzteres ist idR immer nur für zweispurige Fz. relevant), was bei uns mit vehicle=destination übersetzt wird. Eine Sackgasse erfassen wir *nur* am letzten Punkt eines Weges, wenn es dort für *keine* Fortbewegungsart weitergeht.

Ich hab jetzt mal den Teil von der L bis zur HsNr 17 etwas angepasst und würde mich freuen, wenn du weißt, ob da eine Barriere steht oder vielleicht vom NO-Ende des Haselnussweg auch ein Schild steht

Grüße aus Korbach
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180414621
nickvet419 (2026-03-26 00:25:35+00:00): best to change the building tag to razed:building that way the address information remains and people using older imagery can see there isn't a missing building.
Zol87 (2026-03-26 02:36:57+00:00): Thanks, I only remove building that have clearly been demolished and no longer shows up from the default imagery which is Bing Maps Aerial. For more recently demolished buildings, I use demolished:building=yes. I guess from now on i can keep the address node but remove the building.
eggie (2026-03-25 16:33:16+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Andrew Chadwick (2026-03-25 16:04:22+00:00): * best
* storey

Gosh, my typing's getting lazy.
VLD0251 (2026-03-28 21:55:58+00:00): Remember to add a comment (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments) and a source (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source) to every changeset, as previously requested.
MINGTIANZHIHOU (2026-03-26 06:53:18+00:00): This changeset was reverted due to mapping fictitious features.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180438895
NeisBot (2026-03-25 16:09:55+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/11812239215 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Carrelage poseur"
---
Par exemple, une version plus neutre et factuelle de ton texte pourrait être : "Carrelage poseur"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-04-02 16:33:11+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/180416011
Britzz (2026-05-17 16:17:57+00:00): Puisque je passe par là, autre correction possible (effectuée), vous aviez mis office=company, il y avait plus précis possible : craft=tiler (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:craft%3Dtiler).
Bonne poursuite cartographique.
triticom-solutions (2026-05-18 13:20:42+00:00): Merci pour l'info. J'essaierais de m'en souvenir !
Piskvor (2026-03-30 12:38:35+00:00): As of last check on the ground last Friday, 2026-03-27: the bridge width restriction only applies to traffic going from the west to the east, not opposite. (I do not recall a restriction from the east, ever). Edited.
Wildsharky (2026-03-29 12:26:27+00:00):  Reverted in changeset id:180439318
Dawid2849 (2026-03-25 16:16:29+00:00): A dokładniej to skasowanie fikcyjnej jezdni
silversurfer83 (2026-03-25 19:14:00+00:00): Hi :)

was ist denn aus dem Gebäudeteil geworden, welches im ALKIS mit der HsNr 8 erscheint? Liegt über der Tiefgarage kein Wohngebäude?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180415420
NeisBot (2026-03-25 16:22:22+00:00): Hi ANdurtzu, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 95% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 493 landuse(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180415539
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-25 17:21:13+00:00): Could you please respond to the comments on your latest changeset?
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-25 17:30:30+00:00): See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=23853824
rodolfovargas (2026-03-25 23:42:40+00:00): Considera etiquetar los LOTES con la clave: place=plot. Este trabajo de LOTES es más efectivo con imágenes de Aeronave UAV-DRON. En este trabajo, por favor solo trabajos de  EDIFICIOS.
Continua con tus aportes : )
GinaroZ (2026-03-26 19:13:28+00:00): Still a couple of objects on the relation so not actually deleted. Though I wonder if it should be changed to a regional route for Falkland to Newburgh?
Simon Sustrans (2026-03-30 20:13:18+00:00): Hi Ginaro, I have removed the two ways from NCN776 but the guidepost is still there? I will check with WWCT about the regional route; from Auchtermuchty to Newburgh it is part of the Fife Millennium Cycleway
eggie (2026-03-25 16:37:53+00:00): Hi,

Buildings in the Netherland are import from the Dutch Registry.
Be careful changing  the building_shape.

Greetz,
eggie
MappingMore (2026-03-26 12:51:52+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:180452490
rodolfovargas (2026-03-26 00:22:14+00:00): Hola Benjamin. Para esta tarea mapeamos los EDIFICIOS. El mapero de LOTES y otros elementos, hay que considerar otras fuentes de información.
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:01:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:11:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:01:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
mw014 (2026-06-15 08:34:15+00:00): possible doublon avec le noeud "Salle Graffiti" juste à côté ?
De ce que je comprends, le "LAEP | LE PETIT PONT" est une structure, et la "Salle Graffiti" est l'un des centres de cette structure.
Je propose de réunir les deux noeuds et de mettre "LAEP | LE PETIT PONT" dans le tag operator ? https://parents49.fr/agenda_structure/le-petit-pont-2/
mw014 (2026-06-15 08:35:03+00:00): gérant de la structure : "Réseau Parentalité 49"
Sébastien Chopin (2026-06-15 14:30:57+00:00): je suis plutôt d’accord. J’ai hésité sur le coup.
mw014 (2026-06-15 15:19:33+00:00): Ok parfait j'ai fusionné les deux noeuds avec ces tags, ça devrait aller :
name=Salle Graffiti
operator=Le Petit Pont
description=Lieu d’Accueil Enfants-Parents (LAEP) Le Petit Pont
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 08:59:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-25 17:23:00+00:00): Could you please respond to the comments on your latest changeset?
rarad74 (2026-03-25 17:52:43+00:00): Not. It will not respond. We ask him many times...
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-25 19:09:41+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180420443
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:11:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
Kovoschiz (2026-03-26 05:57:41+00:00): Don't add presently irelevant features to OSM. Use OpenHistoricalMap.
olo81 (2026-03-30 09:55:04+00:00): Jeśli jest source:maxspeed=sign  to nie może być maxspeed=40
olo81 (2026-03-31 23:57:07+00:00): przepraszam, jest dobrze
C2oc4 (2026-05-24 07:15:48+00:00): czyli tak ma być?
olo81 (2026-05-24 17:33:01+00:00): Tak jak wyżej napisałem, jest dobrze.
NeisBot (2026-03-25 16:54:50+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 15 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1492772356 v1 | 7 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1492772355 v1 | 6 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180417385
NeisReview (2026-04-02 22:33:21+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/180438233
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:07:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
rodolfovargas (2026-03-26 00:03:46+00:00): Las PAREDES medianeras, mapea con una sola línea. Es más efectivo este mapeo con imágenes de Aeronave UAV-DRON. 
Continua colaborando.
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:09:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
VLD0251 (2026-03-28 22:04:31+00:00): Remember to add a comment (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments) and a source (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source) to every changeset, as previously requested.