piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
woodpeck_repair (2023-01-21 09:10:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131516442, 131526374, 131530757, 131528834, 131521894, 131510103 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy mass edit
yorados (2023-01-20 13:13:49+00:00): Ciao Chilly
Please keep your changes confined to a small geographic region, this makes reviewing them much simpler.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
Happy mapping,
ChillyDL (2023-01-23 21:26:12+00:00): Hello Woodpeck,
oh, what was buggy in all those changesets? There seems to be a problem in JOSM that needs to reported. Let me know, so I can track down the problem.
marczoutendijk (2023-02-06 09:25:27+00:00): I have asked the owner of this business in a PM some more details about the location of their company.

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
Benoît C MdP (2023-01-23 17:07:34+00:00): Bonjour Arnaud,

Merci pour ta contribution. Mais tu as créé un doublon pour la piste cyclable car elle est déjà présente dans OSM sur une voie distincte.

Bonne continuation

Benoît
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2023-01-23 00:48:20+00:00): Hvad er det for noget traffic_calming på
way/1133783671

Du må være lidt mere præcis end bare "yes"
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2023-01-23 12:55:41+00:00): Og jeg har rettet https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10570322851/

Det er jo ikke en fodgængerovergang, der er styret af signaler.  Det et kun bilerne, der har et trafiklys.
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2023-01-23 13:20:22+00:00): Glem det sidste. Der er faktisk signaler på Mapillary.
vonrockos (2023-01-20 16:31:12+00:00): У Пиль Башни постоянная точка фастфуда, даже зимой
ivanbranco (2023-02-01 18:26:53+00:00): Hi Muzican,

do these apartments have a name? a contact of some kind?
JeroenvanderGun (2023-01-22 23:50:58+00:00): You are correct, thanks.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-01-29 07:06:55+00:00): Reverted by DWG as vandalism: changeset 131830410
maraf24 (2023-02-05 16:05:44+00:00): Wycofałem. Tworzenie duplikatów budynków.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-01-29 07:07:06+00:00): Reverted by DWG as vandalism: changeset 131830410
Fizzie-DWG (2023-01-29 07:07:17+00:00): Reverted by DWG as vandalism: changeset 131830410
Fizzie-DWG (2023-01-29 07:07:26+00:00): Reverted by DWG as vandalism: changeset 131830410
Fizzie-DWG (2023-01-29 07:07:35+00:00): Reverted by DWG as vandalism: changeset 131830410
d_berger (2023-01-20 15:48:03+00:00): Vorsicht beim copy-pasting, deine Bäume sind allesamt "Trottoirüberfahrten ohne Blindenleitlinien" (traffic_calming=table, crossing=unmarked, tactile_paving=no). HTH
Gantrisch (2023-01-20 20:38:40+00:00): Oops, danke für den Hinweis! Sollte nun korrigiert sein
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-07-25 14:57:53+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10570397857

shop=onlineshop ? is it shop operating online without presence here? (in such case it should be deleted)

Is it office of such company? (in such case office=company would be valid)

Or is there actual shop there, selling things, where you can walk in?
PT-53 (2023-04-15 06:23:37+00:00): Hallo Bottaro,
Du hast u.a. an diesem Straßenabschnitt
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/232531142/history
die Merkmal-Kombination
- highway=proposed + - proposed=secondary
abgeändert auf
- highway=secondary
ohne das Merkmal
- proposed=secondary
zu löschen.

Wenn die Straße fertiggestellt und für den Verkehr freigegeben ist, reicht es nicht aus, daß Merkmal 
highway=construction auf 
highway=secondary abzuändern. Es muß dann auch noch das Merkmal 
construction=secondary
gelöscht werden. Ansonsten funktioniert das Routing bei manchen Navis dort nicht.
Beispiel:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_car&route=48.1383%2C10.2393%3B48.1442%2C10.2332#map=14/48.1358/10.2031

Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an? 	
Fragende Grüße
Bottaro (2023-04-15 10:30:33+00:00): Hallo PT-53,
danke für den Hinweis.
Ich habe die proposed-Eigenschaft jeweils gelöscht.

Viele Grüße
Fizzie-DWG (2023-01-29 07:07:47+00:00): Reverted by DWG as vandalism: changeset 131830410
Fizzie-DWG (2023-01-29 07:07:58+00:00): Reverted by DWG as vandalism: changeset 131830410
Fizzie-DWG (2023-01-29 07:08:09+00:00): Reverted by DWG as vandalism: changeset 131830410
Fizzie-DWG (2023-01-29 07:08:18+00:00): Reverted by DWG as vandalism: changeset 131830410
InsertUser (2023-01-27 07:32:19+00:00): Do you have a user report that this bridge has reopened in the last couple of weeks? It was signed as closed for repair early January.
MascarinPeak (2023-01-31 07:16:49+00:00): Hello InsertUser, thank you for reaching out.  Upon further investigation of the bridge you mentioned, the resource I cited may have been a bit dated to remove the construction tags here.  Thank you for setting this back to construction.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-01-29 07:08:34+00:00): Reverted by DWG as vandalism: changeset 131830410
SekeRob (2023-01-20 12:52:02+00:00): Noted that this forest due to the bad overlaps of members was not rendering. JOSM now shows it properly closed and forest showing again in standard OSM Carto view.

\o/
PacerCZ (2023-01-21 22:44:25+00:00): Thanks, I am afraid, that caused the bug. But the forest area is really large and there are many wrong inserted subobjects. I want these repair, but somewhere did I probably wrong.
Tom
SekeRob (2023-01-22 08:18:29+00:00): One of the important things in multipolygon mapping is that if 2 or more 'inner' elements share a side, don't make each individual inner (causes QA alerts). Draw a new line around the combination.
You probably know, but if you do that and trace an existing outline, use the F(ollow) key to very quickly draw around those combined inner elements. If you look at Schwarzenbach, I've just made a quick change to include das saegewerk in this outline https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1133802789
Managing and check (very) large multipolygons in JOSM is infinitely better since you can load all the members in a single button push which then activates checks such as if the MP is closed correctly and those overlaps which break rendering.

ciao
Fizzie-DWG (2023-01-29 07:08:48+00:00): Reverted by DWG as vandalism: changeset 131830410
Olga | Yanosik (2023-02-02 10:18:46+00:00): Cześć, chciałam zapytać, dlaczego opuszczona linia kolejowa uzyskała tagowanie drogi w remoncie? Czy coś się na tym odcinku dzieje?
Pozdrawiam
Olga
TomZa1981 (2023-02-02 10:27:14+00:00): Witam. Na tym odcinku jest budowana droga dla rowerów (kontynuacja trasy ze Szczytna).
Olga | Yanosik (2023-02-02 10:41:11+00:00): Ok, to dodam informację, że dotyczy to trasy rowerowej oraz zmienię źle użyte end_date. Dziękuję
TomZa1981 (2023-02-02 10:45:28+00:00): Ok.
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2023-01-23 00:13:23+00:00): crossing=pedestrian_signals bruges ikke
brug:
crossing:signals=yes
Fizzie-DWG (2023-01-29 07:09:11+00:00): Reverted by DWG as vandalism: changeset 131830410
Fizzie-DWG (2023-01-29 07:09:22+00:00): Reverted by DWG as vandalism: changeset 131830410
Fizzie-DWG (2023-01-29 07:09:33+00:00): Reverted by DWG as vandalism: changeset 131830410
4004 (2023-01-22 23:50:11+00:00): а флорист уже не работает по определенным часам?
englu (2023-01-25 15:10:58+00:00): Co się stało z połączeniem ul. Ostrołęckiej z Piłsudskiego? Nie ma tam już przejazdu - ani samochodowego ani pieszego?
Fizzie-DWG (2023-01-29 07:09:45+00:00): Reverted by DWG as vandalism: changeset 131830410
dodoelk (2023-03-22 14:16:18+00:00): czemu usuwasz tagi railway:abandoned? Ta linia kiedyś istniała, co z tego że teraz jest tam ścieżka rowerowa? Przez to że usunąłeś linię kolejową na stronie https://www.openrailwaymap.org/ są dziury w LK 292.

Poprawiłem. Na przyszłość zostaw, są różne wizualizacje, a OSM to baza danych a nie tylko wygląd na stronie www.
Roue-doudou (2023-02-24 13:35:52+00:00): Bonjour, 

Meme commentaire que sur la parking de la place Velpeau. Il faut faire un choix de l'objet sur le quel vous mettez le detail du parking. Sinon cela fait doublon
tshikaboom (2023-01-20 18:10:12+00:00): Hello and thanks for contributing!

Are you sure that the part of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1133807449 behind the fence is actually a parking lot? Aerophotos seem to show a container storage space there, this does not imply the presence of a parking lot. Can you re-check and fix please?
Volts0070 (2023-01-20 18:14:58+00:00): Hello, 
I checked the maaamet website and it was shown there is a parkind lot. So i added it there=)
Volts0070 (2023-01-20 18:17:52+00:00): If you are sure its not a parking lot I redo it, pictures from fotoladu in maaamet show it has been some kind of storage space for these containers for a long time
tshikaboom (2023-01-21 22:20:19+00:00): Hey!
Best would be just to try to reflect the ground truth, as that's what's actually there :)
That can differ from what should be there on paper. Kind of like a house without a kasutusluba, so technically a construction site, even though there can be people living there and it is by all means a functional house.

I'm thinking that maybe this part should be left unmapped, as https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dcontainer says that containers just in storage would not be mapped. Up to you :)
Is this a school project or something you're doing by the way? Seeing a lot of new editors these past few days. Would be nice to just know what's going on :)
Cheers!
Roue-doudou (2023-02-24 13:33:59+00:00): Bonjour,

Il n'est pas nécéssaire de mapper le batiment qui represente le parking et le point qui represente la position du parking. La batiment est suffisant, sinon cela fait doublon.
Si vous souhaitez avoir une area et un point pour ce parking, il faut enlever les information dans l'objet area et uniquement garder le detail dans le point.
NorthCrab (2023-01-22 07:15:10+00:00): Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Przyłączenie drogi do obszaru farm nie jest w żaden sposób pozytywną modyfikacją. Należy unikać łączenia elementów symbolicznych (drogi) z wszelakimi obrysami. Nie ma to żadnej funkcjonalności a utrudnia utrzymanie mapy. Pozdrawiam!
dcapillae (2023-01-20 13:55:13+00:00): ¡Buen trabajo!
basilisk (2023-05-29 19:38:33+00:00): За месяц до этого вы уже добавили европочту сюда. Может хватит?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10542389703
kate_rocketdata (2023-06-05 10:24:37+00:00): Добрый день! 
Убрали дубликат из нашей базы. Спасибо!
Gonéo (2023-01-22 21:01:50+00:00): Bonjour, vous avez demandé une relecture pour votre contribution. Après vérification je n'ai pas de remarque particulière.  Sauf peut-être préciser les horaires de vacances ? Merci pour votre contribution.
PT-53 (2023-04-20 09:21:09+00:00): Hallo Ottmar,
diese Linien
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1133809529/history#map=17/48.07829/9.01140
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1133811754/history
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1133510534/history
haben (noch?) keine Merkmale und sind auch nicht Mitglied eines MP.
Grüße
OF-1 (2023-04-20 10:24:19+00:00): Hallo Peter,
danke für den Hinweis. Habe sie entfernt.
Grüße Ottmar
Fizzie-DWG (2023-01-29 07:09:55+00:00): Reverted by DWG as vandalism: changeset 131830410
4004 (2023-01-22 23:53:04+00:00): Театр not тэатр?
Rico557 (2023-01-23 10:43:57+00:00): Конечно "тэатр". Наверное русская раскладка стояла, я самоисправления не заметил.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-01-29 07:10:08+00:00): Reverted by DWG as vandalism: changeset 131830410
Fizzie-DWG (2023-01-29 07:10:18+00:00): Reverted by DWG as vandalism: changeset 131830410
kubahahaha (2023-01-24 02:50:38+00:00): Cześć, nieczynne obiekty wojskowe nie powinny być oznaczane jak czynne. Poprawiłem tą edycję.
map per (2023-01-22 20:30:47+00:00): Hallo 1358,

ich fand es vorher eigentlich besser Eingezeichnet. Die Links an der Aufgabelung anfangen zu lassen finde ich logischer als wenn die Links an der Brücke beginnen.

Viele Grüße
map per
1358 (2023-01-23 08:52:34+00:00): Hallo map per,

aufgefallen war mir das Stück, weil es beim Rendern einer Übersichtskarte (auf der natürlich Auffahrts- und Abfahrtsrampen nicht enthalten sind) ein größeres sichtbares Loch an der Stelle gab. 

Ich hatte den Übergang jetzt an die Brücke gesetzt, weil ungefähr auch dort die Zusammenführung auf eine Spur beginnt (und wenn ichs richtig im Kopf hab da auch das Schild ist) und danach dann der Rampenteil beginnt, das würde aber auch bis zur Fußgängerunterführung geschoben passen. 

Das Stück zwischen Abfahrt/Auffahrt im Norden und Brücke ist ja auch von der Beschilderung her effektiv Hauptfahrbahn.
Die *_link-Klassifizierungen beschreiben ja die bauliche Trennung und nicht die logische Eigenschaft eines Teiles.

Aber lass uns das gern bereden.


Viele Grüße
1358
map per (2023-01-24 09:09:25+00:00): Stimmt, die Autobahn Ende / Anfangs Schilder sind gute Stellen für den Wechsel zu link. Hab die motorway jetzt bis zu den Schildern verlängert.
Anil Basnet (2025-12-04 11:17:16+00:00): Overlapping forest created. Please fix !!
Fizzie-DWG (2023-01-29 07:10:27+00:00): Reverted by DWG as vandalism: changeset 131830410
NorthCrab (2023-01-22 07:16:49+00:00): Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Dzięki za poprawkę!
Fizzie-DWG (2023-01-29 07:10:37+00:00): Reverted by DWG as vandalism: changeset 131830410
ALu68 (2023-01-21 09:20:21+00:00): Hallo November2019,

Gut, dass du die sinnlosen area-keys nicht mehr verwendest.

Jedoch definierst du immer noch den Namen "Lagerplatz", was mit hoher Wahrscheinlichkeit kein Name ist.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1133816072
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1133504152
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1133445782

https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1qq0

Auch "Tümpel" ist noch dabei. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1133396932
November2019 (2023-01-24 10:39:01+00:00): Hallo ALu68,

ich bin bereit das Beschriften der Lagerplätze rückgängig zu machen, es dauert aber noch ein paar Wochen bis ich Weißen Flächen im WAK Rhönorte beendet habe ...

MfG November2019
Piskvor (2023-01-20 15:16:08+00:00): Díky, dobrý postřeh: někdo tu křižovatku předtím trošku rozkopal. Dodal jsem tagy ke směru, rozchodu, a napájení.
woodpeck_repair (2023-01-21 09:10:08+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 131503279, 131503291, 131503300, 131503308, 131503314, 131503329.
ottwiz (2023-01-20 14:11:56+00:00): I used NAIP too but I didn't write into the sources since NAIP was used for checking.
Baloo Uriza (2024-11-01 21:38:53+00:00): Name should only be the name, and not include the branch or operator.  There's branch=* and operator=* for that information.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131510174
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-01-20 17:02:48+00:00): Tere, saatkonna parklas juhslikult panite puutega inimeste parkimiskohtade arvu.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-02-07 18:49:13+00:00): Had to fix myself :(
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2023-01-21 11:22:41+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14227847

Mangler et "to" medlem.
Og det kan ikke være Trianglen, for den er ensrettet.
Baloo Uriza (2023-01-25 05:17:15+00:00): Nice edit, but the changeset comment could use a little work to at least give a ballpark idea of what's going on.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131510629
AkuAnakTimur (2023-01-20 14:29:13+00:00): 1800+ objects... let me know if I screwed up things grand
user_177389 (2023-01-20 16:36:04+00:00): Hello,

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kallankari_Islands wrote:
"Legally, however, the Kallankari Islands does not belong to Finnish self-governing communities or organizations, unlike Åland."

-> so not intended as an administrative boundary
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2023-01-30 19:43:00+00:00): مرحبا بك في خارطة الشارع المفتوحةوشكرا على مساهماتك في جعل الخريطة أفضل، ونرجوا منك عدم إزالة عنصر لأنه غير ضروري فكل ماهو موجود على أرض الواقع بالإمكان إدخاله للخريطة
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2023-01-30 19:44:05+00:00): تم استرجاع هذا التغيير:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131894496
emersonveenstra (2023-01-21 14:22:04+00:00): Hi,

You put width=0 on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/566214704, this says that the path does not exist (is 0 meters wide). Could you please fix this? Thanks!
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2023-01-21 11:35:08+00:00): Nu er der lanes:backward på en ensrettet vej.

sidewalk=both er ikke korrekt.

Der mangler en fodgængerovergang, der forbinder de to veje.

Cykelstien krydser de to Trianglen veje uden at de er forbundet til vejene.

Cykelstien har et segregated tag, selvom der ikke er et foot tag.

Der mangler lyskryds mod øst.

Der er ikke så meget oprydning over det.
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2023-01-23 00:09:19+00:00): crossing=island er deprecated,
brug crossing:island=yes
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2023-01-24 20:11:04+00:00): vej 1133826296
er ensrettet, men har lanes:backward=2
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:07:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
gendy54 (2023-07-11 18:04:00+00:00): Bonjour,

J'ai corrigé ton ajout. Tu peux voir ici les modifications apportées : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10570662962/history
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:04:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:02:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:01:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:06:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
Jakka (2023-01-20 18:06:08+00:00): c'est "food_court" ???
"indoor place or area within a facility that is contiguous with the counters of multiple food vendors"
Pense un endroit et un shop/fastfood

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=food%20court?uselang=nl
fredlenoir (2023-01-20 19:21:31+00:00): En effet c'est une creperie / tea room
Jakka (2023-01-20 19:29:59+00:00): pense a ....
shop=coffee
cuisine=pancakes
Jakka (2023-01-20 19:30:40+00:00): Possible pas icones mais cela fait rien....
Jakka (2023-01-20 19:33:06+00:00): NR 8 et 9 deux fois meme ?
Quels sont vos goûts?
Vous connaissez les environs ?
fredlenoir (2023-01-20 21:05:54+00:00): "Quels sont vos gouts" ont agrandi leur boucherie. j'habite là bas.  je travaille aussi dans le service Data de l'agence de dév. territorial. J'aimerais coordonner un projet auprès des 84 communes de la Province pour mettre à jour OSM sur le commerce, mobilité...
fredlenoir (2023-01-20 21:08:52+00:00): Rien n'a été mis à jour. Aussi il existe une demande à pouvoir identifier les circuits courts dont les magasins de maraicher, ferme (producteur/vendeur) . j'ai vu qu'on pouvait tagger Origin=local
Jakka (2023-01-21 08:32:02+00:00): "Quels sont vos gouts" c'est un magasin. une node a proximité de l’entrée est bon idée mais ne touché pas au forme des battement eux sont deux
origin=local Si les tag et value sont en Anglais et il y a pas de wiki c'est bon Circuit court voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop comme shop= 	farm
adrianojbr (2023-01-20 22:13:34+00:00): Olá, amichelon!

Excente trabalho que você está fazendo em São Joaquim.

Venho apenas alertar que não se deve mapear o mesmo PoI como ponto ou área, conforme https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#One_feature,_one_OSM_element

Abraço!
amichelon (2023-01-23 10:47:58+00:00): Olá adrianojbr.

Agradeço o elogio e a orientação. Vou procurar não repetir esta prática.

Abraço!
Jakka (2023-01-20 18:00:34+00:00): deplacer poste sur batiment 44 correct ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6241873427
dankarran (2023-01-21 17:36:58+00:00): Hi Gill. How much of this estate is complete now? It looks like it was about half open when the latest aerial images were taken, but I wonder if more of it has opened up since, as some of it looked close to completion.
user_18250760 (2023-01-20 14:59:04+00:00): January 22, 2023 9PM
Carto'Cité (2023-03-29 13:07:16+00:00): Salut Alix,

J'ai undelete cette association et je l'ai replacée au bon endroit. Sur leur site ils existent toujours. Tu me dis si tu avais une autre info mais je pense que c'est une erreur 😉

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6990384387

Charles
cserpell (2023-03-01 19:43:12+00:00): Hola, qué hay que revisar exactamente?
felipeeugenio (2023-03-01 19:55:19+00:00): Hola.
Que se hayan terminado se ejecutar los trabajos
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:02:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
Jakka (2023-01-20 17:52:29+00:00): Le batiment reste type gare mais plus en function/historic
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused:*
le nom"Ancienne gare" n'est pas nom propre" j'ai mis loc_name
gurglypipe (2023-01-23 11:44:45+00:00): Hiya, the Bay Cycleway is already mapped as going along Lindale Road here.

You can see the current route relation here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7024538#map=15/54.1906/-2.9002

Is the Promenade an optional loop on the route, or has the route been completely diverted?

If it’s an optional loop then I guess the railway crossings at Blawith Point and the Memorial Playing Fields should also be added to the route, to join the loop up? Is that what’s present on the ground?

Thanks!
gurglypipe (2023-01-23 14:33:35+00:00): Thanks for updating it. That’ll be useful for a lot of people.

(For anyone else following along, the rest of the loop was added in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131607138)
Jakka (2023-01-20 17:46:59+00:00): le nom "Esneux rue de la station" Le vrai nom ? panneaux ?
Si deux différente parking divisé les
Glassman (2023-01-22 20:38:20+00:00): #TIP: the relation contains the needed tags that describe the boundary. Tagging each section can cause problems if they are also used by other relations.  In this case it may because part of the way is used to describe the county boundary as well.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131512375
kevinschaul (2023-01-23 19:35:17+00:00): Thanks, Glassman. I was giving this way the same tags as the ways next to it, like the following:

- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/782296837/history
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/793911435/history

Are all of those boundaries tagged incorrectly? It seems to me that every way that makes up the state border has these tags on it. My intention was to coordinate this segment's tags with the rest, because my usage of OSM data showed this segment as different than the rest, which I think was a mistake.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131512375
Glassman (2023-01-24 22:21:16+00:00): Relations in OSM are a great addition but can be difficult to deal with. Each way can be used in other polygons so adding tags to the way won't make sense to the other uses of the way. I believe relationships are unique to OSM and not found in normal GIS products. Because relations are difficult to deal with using JOSM as an editor can help. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:boundary for more info on boundary relations
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:03:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.