piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Taya_S (2025-01-04 13:06:25+00:00): Hello, I have reverted this changeset. As DawsZed explained in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160960776 this is a railway ferry, not a motorway tunnel. Tagging it as such is not correct.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160984938
sheldonelectric (2025-01-25 15:16:03+00:00): hey there, for the vegan option you can also add diet:vegan=yes 
welcome on openstreetmap!
pavvv (2025-01-04 10:57:51+00:00): to jeszcze jest int_name do usunięcia
maro21 (2025-01-05 15:05:44+00:00): Czy cały kampus zajmuje tylko ten wydział?
jakistamMati (2025-01-10 08:42:05+00:00): Tak, wszystkie bundynki które tam są tyczą sie tylko wefim'u
jakistamMati (2025-01-10 08:44:08+00:00): Spoko int_name wywalone też :)
gscholz (2025-01-05 07:56:03+00:00): Hi EasyKoni,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting and displaced ways:


https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=119.83011&lat=-2.89642&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=160978041

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
EasyKoni (2025-01-06 11:06:59+00:00): Hi Guido,
Strange, some streets got moved. Probably by accident.
I think I fixed it now… 
Greetings from Sulawesi
gscholz (2025-01-07 07:09:20+00:00): Thanks for your quick response.
Guido
Lezurex (2025-01-04 10:35:51+00:00): Hallo stillhart,

Dein Construction-Tagging auf dem Trottoir war nicht ganz korrekt. Richtig wäre highway=construction und construction=footway, wobei construction den Wert bekommt, der nach den Bauarbeiten bei highway hinkommt.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160979822

LG Lezurex
gscholz (2025-01-22 07:22:53+00:00): Hi helicoysfh_Plateau_import,
your recent import activities have left behind several errors regarding self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=137.06146&lat=34.90160&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2025-01-05 07:52:04+00:00): Hi Supaplex,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=117.87007&lat=24.06041&zoom=17&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=160978520

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2025-01-08 09:19:09+00:00): Hi Supaplex, 
this error still exits, can I get your feedback here?
Guido
Supaplex (2025-01-22 04:17:29+00:00): Sorry for the late reply

I fix it in this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161622300
osmviborg (2025-01-04 09:54:42+00:00): https://imgur.com/a/fgLm8Du
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-13 00:52:08+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164876409
BCNorwich (2025-01-05 08:43:50+00:00): Hi, These grass areas don't extend over asphalt roads and paths. Not do they join onto the center lines of highways. Because it would obstruct traffic. 

Regards Bernard.
stasiu512 (2025-01-04 11:17:21+00:00): Cześć, nie duplikuj POI, dodałeś informacje w bydynku oraz w osobnym punkcie. To duplikacja!
Marek-M (2025-01-04 11:30:06+00:00): Usunąłem duplikat z obrysu budynku, teraz POI jest tylko w punkcie.

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=160981654
eUeM (2025-01-04 12:59:21+00:00): Dziękuję za korektę.
canfe (2026-04-25 08:24:50+00:00): I level non vanno separati da virgola ma da punto e virgola oppure in altri casi dal meno.
Vedi la wiki prima.
stasiu512 (2025-01-06 13:42:49+00:00): Cześć, nazwy firm zapisujemy z wielkiej litery (pierwsza litera wielka, reszta mała).
Enock4seth (2025-01-04 11:20:16+00:00): Hi Shevshenko, Kindly use Good changeset comments to describe your contributions as using only these hashtags are meaningless to other mappers and yourself soon. See why you should use Good changeset comments https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments#Why_should_I_use_Changeset_Comments?
lecky3 (2025-04-17 14:06:22+00:00): attention à ne pas modifier le nom de notre lieu.
VLD528 (2025-05-13 10:24:45+00:00): Pas de soucis, j'en ai pris note !
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-06 04:23:45+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164574260
Shaun das Schaf (2025-01-04 16:10:48+00:00): Hallo sanzewa, willkommen bei OSM!

Bitte verwende immer aussagekräftige Kommentare für deine Änderungssätze, damit andere nachvollziehen können, was du geändert hast. Mit "." kann niemand etwas anfangen. Auch "Anpassung" hat Informationsgehalt gleich Null.

Du hast das Gebäude des alten TEDi komplett entfernt, gleichzeitig aber einen Punkt reingesetzt, dass es zur Zeit leersteht. Ich gehe also davon aus, dass das Gebäude noch besteht und somit nicht gelöscht gehört:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=160981427

"Zur Zeit leerstehend" ist übrigens kein Name, und gehört eher in das Feld "Notiz".

Ich werde das entfernte Gebäude wiederherstellen.

Viele Grüße
Shaun das Schaf
Marek-M (2025-01-04 14:20:10+00:00): Tutaj połączyłeś landuse z linią energetyczną - poprawiłem https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=160986855
VincentVE (2025-01-04 11:33:43+00:00): wijziging van enkele landelijke plaatsen, m.n. dorpen, van place=suburb, naar place=village, waar dit beter van toepassing lijkt (naar analogie met gebruikelijke tagschema van andere dorpen in Vlaanderen)
NorthCrab_upload (2025-01-04 11:41:58+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2379152908
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/229296598

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/381404572
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/381405162
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/442380016
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/442380017
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/442380018
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/442380019
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/442380020
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/442380147
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/442963725

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Rowerowa":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12473365132
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12473365133
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12473365134

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
grzegorz75jan (2025-05-30 17:40:27+00:00): Masz może coś do powiedzenia na temat tego co się stało w okolicach miejscowości Polanów. 
Całe zalane lasem.

Możesz też wydukiwać z siebie coś więcej w "opisach" zmian niż zasrane 

"Mapowanie na podstawie nagrania z rejestratora samochodowego "

Proponuję się odezwać tu https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/zglaszanie-i-prosby-o-sprawdzenie-kont-edycji-uzytkownikow/110854/176
Im szybciej tym lepiej.
grzegorz75jan (2025-05-30 17:48:01+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian

https://youtu.be/xBMIoypkdI4?list=PLTgtPjgzssHzsgAqYbi2QfRoRk1S9ioX5&t=2596
Marek_P (2025-05-30 18:12:14+00:00): No to po kolei: do powiedzenia mam tyle, że z jakiegoś powodu duży obiekt na obszarze Polanowa, który do tej pory nie był  otagowany błędnie oznaczyłem jako `forest` (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/191257460#map=13/54.11210/16.66429), biję się w piersi i przywracam poprzednią wersję obiektu. 

Co do opisów, to przechodzę do wskazanego wątku. Nie tu miejsce na dyskusję.
Leo Slager (2025-01-06 18:30:21+00:00): Dag Seat Ibiza,

De changeset levert drie foutmeldingen op:
-Way members unordered or missing
-Stop or platform at end of relation
-Stop_position in wrong order.

Helaas kun je met de editor iD geen routerelaties bewerken, dat gaat altijd fout. De editor iD plakt nieuwe wegen of haltes altijd achter aan de route vast.
De wegen en haltes staan dus altijd in de verkeerde volgorde.

Wil je serieus met routerelaties aan de slag dan zul je moeten overstappen naar de editor JOSM.

De routes van lijn 13 zijn weer gerepareerd.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-01-04 12:11:00+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12473401656

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Bartekkmee (2025-01-04 12:19:33+00:00): Dzięki, niedługo poprawie😊
selillium (2025-01-06 07:01:54+00:00): source: survey
silversurfer83 (2025-01-05 10:19:30+00:00): Moin :)

zwei kleine Tips, damit deine Arbeit in Zukunft noch besser wird:

- Objekte, die rechteckig sein sollen kannst du nach der Klassifizierung einfach mit der Taste "Q" rechtwinklig machen. Sieht besser aus.

- Wenn eine Adresse sauber auf ein Gebäude gehört, kannst du sie auch direkt an das Gebäude schreiben. Als Punkt im Gebäude geht es auch, ist anders aber eindeutiger. Alternativ kannst du den Punkt mit der Adresse auch an die Stelle des Haupteingangs setzen, falls diese Information bekannt ist.

Happy mapping
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160983777
rambocordi (2025-01-07 23:01:31+00:00): Vielen Dank für die Hinweise!! Hab es gleich mal ausprobiert.
BCNorwich (2025-01-05 08:19:46+00:00): Hi, Some of your newly added fences do not seem to make science, fences and gates in the middle of what looks like open fields. Also some fences cross over others with no join. Could you please look at this problem?

Regards Bernard.
Dawid2849 (2025-01-04 21:28:16+00:00): Ups, musiałem przez przypadek zaznaczyć ten odcinek. Oczywiście, od ronda z Obwodnicą Północną do skrzyżowania z ul. Romanowskiego jest pas rowerowy, dopiero dalej jest pobocze. Dzięki za poprawkę
grelus (2025-01-05 20:36:34+00:00): haha, spoko. Trochę pogrzebałem na wyjezdnym to tu to tam. Ale już wracam na północ :-)
superkiria (2025-01-12 12:51:29+00:00): Добрый день!
Вы присоединили дорогу к границе районов, так лучше не делать, я отсоединил.
Это сельскохозяйственная дорога, её можно просто так обозначить и ничего кроме покрытия не указывать.
Thibault Rommel (2025-01-04 12:50:05+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159292724#map=13/50.93095/3.45331
ceirios (2025-01-04 12:54:27+00:00): My apologies for the huge box, it was for editing British Overseas Territories relation too
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3969434
ziomio (2025-01-04 13:02:42+00:00): https://www.autostradaregionalecispadana.it/it/
mavl (2025-02-05 14:03:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162167075 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted. Reason: wrong values for name:en - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161608012].
ManuelB701 (2025-01-11 07:36:11+00:00): Kleiner Tipp: Du kannst Läden auch direkt über StreetComplete hinzufügen anstelle sofort einen Hinweis zu erstellen.
margin-auto (2025-01-11 15:44:12+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis, die Funktion kenne ich. Muss mir wieder abgewöhnen, in Streetcomplete Hinweise zu erstellen, anstatt private GPX-Notizen. Aber manchmal ist das so verdammt praktisch ;-)
aceman444 (2025-01-04 15:41:16+00:00): Znovu nezmyselne zmeny. Vsetko vratene do povodneho stavu. Prestante nicit cesty v Openstreetmap. Nastudujte si najprv pravidla, ako som Vam uz poslal.
aceman444 (2025-01-06 16:04:59+00:00): Teda pri tom kruhovom objazde chapem co ste chceli dosiahnut, ale treba to urobit inak.
Priechody pre chodcov OK, to obnovim.
Ale zmena krizovatky 517 s najazdom na D1 uplne zbytocna a chybna.
MarcoR (2026-05-25 19:26:20+00:00): Ciao!
Se si trattava di una statua del Cristo posta a lato strada penso avresti potuto usare historic=wayside_shrine

Buon mapping,
Marco.
ernestoandolfi (2026-05-26 10:41:56+00:00): Ciao. Mah..... boh..... Secondo me non va bene il tag dell'edicola votiva. Trattasi di una statua alta più di due metri. E' proprio una statua, non un tabernacolo. Però se invece ritieni che sia giusto cambiare,  cambia, senza problemi.  Ciao.
MarcoR (2026-05-26 12:18:33+00:00): Grazie per la risposta :)

Ad essere sincero, ho trovato quel nodo perché ha il tag memorial=historic che non è documentato; la cosa più semplice da fare secondo me sarebbe cambiare quel tag in historic=memorial (+memorial=statue)... però penso che le statue di persone/divinità appartenenti alla sfera religiosa andrebbero mappate in un altro modo (appunto come historic=wayside_shrine se prevale l'uso come luogo di preghiera, oppure tourism=artwork + artwork_type=statue se prevale l'aspetto artistico).

È solo il mio punto di vista: lascio a te decidere cosa fare visto che a differenza mia conosci l'oggetto in questione.

Buon mapping,
Marco
rskedgell (2025-01-09 17:37:18+00:00): Maybe discuss it with a local who actually understands how parking permits work around here first, or at least have the basic courtesy to discuss it?

From the wiki for access=permit:
"Open only to people who have obtained a permit granting them access, but permit is ordinarily granted. If permit is hard to obtain, then it is typically access=private."

In most London boroughs, residents are given an allocation of visitor permits. A permit is therefore very easy to obtain on request.
mueschel (2025-01-09 18:07:50+00:00): But that's clearly what is described in the Wiki. I won't get a permit by going to some place, filling a form and paying a fee. I need to be a resident in the area, or need to be invited by one. That's exactly what access=private, private=permit is intended to mean.
rskedgell (2025-01-09 18:47:36+00:00): No, you'll get a permit by filling in a web form, e.g. 

https://www.walthamforest.gov.uk/parking-roads-and-travel/parking-permits-and-suspensions/resident-traders-parking-permit
mueschel (2025-01-09 18:50:26+00:00): "must be applied for by a resident"
rskedgell (2025-01-09 19:05:27+00:00): That's a resident of the CPZ, not of the street. Other permits are available and on the council's website.

Whatever the condition is, it certainly isn't the private=residents which you have used. I have no idea what private=permit is supposed to mean, as it isn't documented on the wiki page for private=*.

This also doesn't cover loading/unloading (delivery in OSM access terms), as it varies between CPZs and needs to be checked against the various traffic orders. I haven't yet captured that either, as I need to add parking:*:zone tags.
rskedgell (2025-01-09 19:14:05+00:00): This was also discussed on OSM Community without reaching any definite conclusion, perhaps continue there?

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/resident-parking-access-permit-gb/106069/3
mueschel (2025-01-09 20:13:16+00:00): private=permit is documented for street parking and was part of the proposal accepted with 98% approval. 
"parking:side:private=* is in use as an addition to specify [private] more precisely, e.g. parking:side:private=residents"
rskedgell (2025-01-09 20:21:52+00:00): Then I suggest that you update the wiki page for private=* to reflect that. Meanwhile, private=residents is still wrong for these streets. Streets which are, incidentally, less than 1km from y home.
mueschel (2025-01-09 20:26:09+00:00): If you are sure that my edit is wrong and against local habits, please feel free to revert it. I'm not insisting, my comments are just to back up my decision with the usage documented in the Wiki.
citrula (2025-01-04 21:38:52+00:00): I mapped these as access=private the last time I walked these trails, because there is a sign at the trailhead that says it's for HOA members/residents only. Do you think that is still the case?
Bizango (2025-01-07 22:59:25+00:00): Ah, I had not seen a sign.
aceman444 (2025-01-04 15:33:46+00:00): Ano, zase nezmyselna demolacia korektnych udajov? Vy necitate co Vam piseme?
aceman444 (2025-01-04 15:34:59+00:00): Zmena bola vratena do povodneho stavu.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-17 02:10:12+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165051276
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-18 04:02:43+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165094884
P_kawa (2025-01-04 14:44:01+00:00): Właściwie to szkół
kmerl (2026-03-22 06:19:42+00:00): Ich finde es schade, dass historische Informationen (ehemalige Bahnstrecke) entfernt werden. Ich hätte es bevorzugt, stattdessen ein geeignetes Attribut einzuführen.
kuhni74 (2025-01-04 14:36:47+00:00): vielen Dank, ich hätt mich eh noch heute drangesetzt, alles hier einzuarbeiten
watmildon (2025-01-04 17:35:58+00:00): Please stop reducing junction detail by merging correctly split ways where there is physical separation. The other details you are adding are great but this particular pattern you are using isn't acceptable. It is damaging work done by other mappers.

My understanding is that other mappers have already been asked to stop using this incorrect pattern. My preference is to not have to involve the data working group but if you're going to insist on making a mess of things for your own style preference, I will have to send them a mail.
Nathan_A_RF (2025-01-04 18:14:50+00:00): I kept the dual carriageways here, I am not sure what you mean otherwise. In fact I even split Birmingham Road where there is a large traffic island fulling traffic onto the A38.
Nathaniel Taulbut (2025-01-04 20:05:50+00:00): I'm not sure about this changeset, but you know what he's referring to. If you want to not split road ways around pedestrian islands that's fine, but it is unacceptable to go around "simplifying" and deleting detail that has already been added by other people, when it is an agreed correct way of mapping.
watmildon (2025-01-06 20:40:40+00:00): It is the accepted concensus practice to split highway= ways where there is a median or other physical separation. This has been explained to you and you insist on mapping as you prefer. This is causing tension with other mappers in your area which is why we map using the consensus patterns and not our own preferences. 

My hope is that you will respond affirming that you have heard and internalized this feedback from your fellow mappers and will cease reducing split ways into single ways with nodes embedded in them. If you choose not to I will have to escalate to the DWG who will then come and place a block until you decide you want to play along with everyone nicely. I do not understand your general reticence. Take a the feedback and we can all move on. We all make concessions of this type to help keep the map a happy place.
Nathan_A_RF (2025-01-06 20:59:39+00:00): If there is a consensus then it is not a very clear one - the wiki page states that either mapping technique is acceptable. Regardless, this is pointless for me to continue arguing with those who refuse to move from their positions, so I will move from mine.
watmildon (2025-01-06 21:02:12+00:00): You are free to add NEW way in either manner. You are not supposed to redo work from the more complex detail level to the lower detail level. This is common for footway/crossing mapping etc. I'm not asking you to make new things in a particular style. Simply to stop undoing the work of others.
Nathan_A_RF (2025-01-06 21:07:46+00:00): Then that needs to be made clearer.
Lumikeiju (2025-01-06 21:20:40+00:00): That has been made abundantly clear in these discussions. Undoing - especially by simplifying - the work that has been put in by other mappers is disrespectful. As others have said, you are of course free to (and welcome to!) map unmapped things in your preferred level of detail, leaving them up for others to iteratively refine, but please do not downgrade the detail added by others.
Nathan_A_RF (2025-01-06 21:25:41+00:00): Not really in my eyes, the reasoning for all this still seems ambiguous. Regardless, as I said, I am not going to argue further as no one is going to budge from their position, so I will oblige.
watmildon (2025-01-06 21:41:10+00:00): I appreciate it Nathan. Happy mapping.
Baloo Uriza (2025-01-05 16:48:08+00:00): Sidewalks should take the name of the street they're a part of.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160988418
Baloo Uriza (2025-01-05 16:48:29+00:00): Sidewalks should take the name of the street they're a part of.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160988418
Allison P (2025-01-05 21:16:45+00:00): There is no consensus around such a thing.
Zilvervisje (2025-11-07 13:14:42+00:00): Hey eggie, waarom heb je hier fietsers toegestaan? Dit lijkt mij gewoon een stoep? Op ndw staat dit pad ook als voetpad.
Mvg
eggie (2025-11-07 13:22:49+00:00): Hoi...  Toen het werd aangelegd was het niet duidelijk een wandelpad. Ik heb het toen als highway=path getagd.
Je kunt gewoon van a naar b fietsen.
Het heeft ook aan beide zijden geen opstaande stoeprand. 
Dus in twijfelgevallen maakt ik dan er een highway=path van.
Er staat geen G7 bord. 
Het wordt ook als fietsverbinding gebruikt om van die oostwijk naar het Paulusplein te fietsen.
Fietrsers gaan niet eerst naar de Mauritsweg..    en er is geen fietsverbod. (G7)
Maar het zijn wel van die twijfelgevallen.
Zat in dubio.
Groet,
eggie
eggie (2025-11-07 13:41:23+00:00): Dan nog iets... Er staat nergens in de wegenverkeerswet dat je niet op je 'stoep' mag fietsen.
Je moet in dat geval de hoofdrijbaan of het naastgelegen fietspad nemen.
Dat is hier niet.
Het is al vele malen aan de orde geweest.
Op een wandelpad (G7) of suidelijk alleen voor wandelaars bedoeld mag je inderdaad niet fietsen.
Hier dus een twijfelgeval.
Zilvervisje (2025-11-07 13:47:58+00:00): Dus dan zou je hier ook mogen fietsen? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/7338893
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/138313035
eggie (2025-11-07 13:53:38+00:00): Denk langs de kerk meer bedoeld is voor voetgangers en die gravelpaden ook.
Het blijkt weer eens hoe lastig het is om het goed in te schatten.
Dat pad naar het Paulusplein is meer een verbindng
eggie (2025-11-07 13:54:24+00:00): Lees.. doorsteek voor janenalleman.
NathanBnm (2025-02-13 09:38:21+00:00): Bonjour David, attention lors de l'ajout des bornes de recharge. La position GPS de l'open data n'est pas toujours exacte. L'une des deux bornes que tu avais ajouté était en doublon. Je viens d'effectuer les corrections.
kuhni74 (2025-01-04 14:58:33+00:00): merci!
fie (2025-01-13 07:10:13+00:00): An ncleanser:
Die gelöschten Wege 1178556219 und 1178556220 existieren! Bitte wiederherstellen und nicht blind nach veralteten Luftbildaufnahmen agieren.
julcnx (2025-01-24 04:25:27+00:00): Hi Killar,  

Could you clarify what you meant by `highway=path + motor_vehicle=yes`? Are these paths wide enough for 4-wheel vehicles (like `highway=track`), or are they only suitable for motorcycles (`highway=path + motorcycle=yes`)?  

Just a heads-up: using legal access tags to indicate physical suitability is discouraged in Thailand. You can find more details in our wiki: [WikiProject Thailand](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Thailand).  

If I don’t hear back from you, I’ll assume these are narrow paths suitable for motorcycles and adjust them accordingly.  

Best,  
Julien
AndyB_66 (2025-01-04 19:02:08+00:00): You have been asked to conform to the changeset naming rules (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments). Please do, instead of applying random letter combinations (such as 'fkj', 'rtyh', etc.). Thank you.
Tatfahren (2025-01-04 16:06:27+00:00): Bist du sicher das die Pyramide dieses Jahr in der Vierten Etage ist? Letztes Jahr stand sie zwar erhöht, aber trotzdem auf dem Boden.