piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NorthCrab (2023-05-22 10:13:34+00:00): A nie wiem, gdzie? To przez StreetComplete uzupełnione.
NorthCrab (2023-05-22 10:15:28+00:00): Przy zmianie surface, smoothness jest w większości przypadków unieważniony. Trzeba go dodać na nowo z uwzględnieniem nowego surface. Gravel było w tym miejscu niepoprawnie więc można założyć że smoothness tym bardziej nie miał sensu. Kwestia dodania go z powrotem.
NieWnen (2023-05-22 10:15:41+00:00): Na fragmentach ścieżki pieszo-rowerowej tzw. "kuweta" :D
noliver (2024-12-01 20:51:00+00:00): Thanks for adding features to the map.  However, please be careful not to rely on aerial imagery instead of what's on the ground.  In this case, you reverted the new boat launch that was already open to the old configuration.  I've just fixed it back to the way it should be.
TrickyFoxy (2023-11-25 14:07:02+00:00): Нельзя https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:website#Privacy_and_security
jmarchon (2023-05-22 05:14:25+00:00): Nice work! Welcome to OSM!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136390314
seeergiofdez (2023-05-25 16:19:12+00:00): Muy útil. Gracias!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136391036
DUGA (2023-12-26 04:54:26+00:00): Drop the useless source tag.
adiatmad (2023-05-22 07:36:35+00:00): Hi, do you mind checking this? It seems there's an issue with "Self-intersecting ways" (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1174897734).
Thanks!
ks1v (2023-05-22 09:58:25+00:00): Hello! Corrected, thanks!
Gnugie (2024-11-08 15:10:05+00:00): What's the basis for marking the cloverleaf as no for foot/bicycle/horse?

Both intersecting roads allow them, and there's no obvious signage supporting this.
emersonveenstra (2023-05-25 13:35:38+00:00): Hi,

Did you mean for this admin_level to be 18? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1174905275
wegerje (2023-05-25 14:11:48+00:00): Yeah. It was an idea I got from the wiki for a "HOA" "Home Owners Association"

Regrettably the standard OSM rendering ignores it. sigh. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Homeowners%27_association
emersonveenstra (2023-05-25 18:00:30+00:00): Right, but according to that wiki page it should be 10, not 18
wegerje (2023-05-27 00:15:30+00:00): OK. Changed it to 10. Thanks a bunch! :)
gscholz (2023-05-23 09:57:03+00:00): Hi Fidelis Assis,
this changeset has created several errors in the OSM database eg. self intersecting ways:


https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-70.73133&lat=-10.38466&zoom=10&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=136392556

Can you please fix this?

May be you also like to check the destroyed relation for "Sena Madureira":

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6163924/history#map=9/-9.7735/-69.4204

Kind regards
Guido
Fidelis Assis (2023-05-23 15:38:58+00:00): Hi Guido,

- Sena Madureira: fixed.
- Self intersection: I was not able to find my login associated to that ralation. Historic shows that relation was last changed in 2020 by another user.  Maybe I'm not using the monitoring tools correctly, could you explain how you associated my login to the self intersection?

Thanks for the warnings and best regards.
-- Fidelis
gscholz (2023-05-24 05:39:43+00:00): Hi Fidelis,
this is often kind of difficult, as lines get no change in history if you only move a node. There was a talk about this topic at the FOSSGIS conference this year in Germany about this. They are thinking about to change this, but nothing is decided yet. 
So you must sometimes search on node level to find the author.
Guido
Fidelis Assis (2023-05-24 12:57:41+00:00): Hi Guido.

I understand, thanks. Since my focus at the moment is on county boundaries, I almost certainly haven't edited that relation or its ways, except maybe to unglue one or another node from a boundary way, and that might explain it. Also, as it is an international border, I avoid touching it except for small adjustments of less than a few tens of meters. So, probably that intersection was already there and I didn't notice because the relation was incomplete. History sometimes may fool us. 

-- Fidelis
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-09-23 05:55:57+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10917390100/history - what is the real source of this data?

What is the license of imported data here?

Is it done as part of you employment at Meta (AKA Facebook)?
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-09-23 13:29:19+00:00): also send mail to meta@openstreetmap.id as this account is inactive
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-09-24 02:52:12+00:00): email bounced, sending to osm@fb.com as per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities/Meta
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-05 09:03:24+00:00): opened https://github.com/facebookmicrosites/Open-Mapping-At-Facebook/issues/34 - repo linked at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities/Meta
ElliottPlack (2023-05-31 13:38:18+00:00): Hi there, thanks for adding this. There is some new Mapillary here from 5/27 if you'd like to look and make some revisions to the fixmes. Ciao!
aTarom (2023-05-22 06:38:57+00:00): Hi Xisco, thank you for providing information, one question please. Is possible that the
"communication:mf"
is maybe
"communication:fm"?
at
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3843776959/history
Cheers
Xisco (2023-05-22 08:11:58+00:00): Hi aTarom.

Thank you for your remarks.

This emitting center is composed by a MF or MW (medium frequency/medium wave) transmitter (1080KHz): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medium_frequency

The mode is not FM (I understand the confusion with MF) but AM, which I have added.

Feel free to edit it if needed.

Cheers.
literan (2023-05-22 16:51:08+00:00): и это дубль
literan (2023-05-22 16:50:29+00:00): зачем-то вы дубли внесли, прям поверх уже добавленных ранее
emersonveenstra (2023-05-22 10:49:12+00:00): Hi,

You created a way with no tags here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1174932475

Could you please go back and tag it? Thanks!
Tom Cumbow (2023-05-29 15:06:24+00:00): Good catch. Thanks! for brining it to my attention :-)
Langlaeufer (2023-05-22 06:30:48+00:00): Hab mal service draus gemacht und access nach Schild angepasst
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136396028
AndySchulte (2023-05-22 06:34:46+00:00): Danke dir Langlaeufer
MxxCon (2023-05-23 03:23:38+00:00): This POI will be deleted since EVERY SINGLE tag you added is wrong and doesn't exist in OSM.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136396111
Hufkratzer (2023-05-23 00:08:25+00:00): Hi,
an https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/193513057 hast du das building=yes entfernt und dafür leisure=horse_riding drangetaggt. Das ist aus mehreren Gründen schlecht:
1. ist ist das Gebäude jetzt nicht mehr als Gebäude auf der Karte sichtbar.
2. sollte das Tag leisure=horse_riding nicht für einzelne Gebäude, sondern für die Reitanlage komplett verwendet werden, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure=horse_riding
und z.B.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/107249770

Für Reithallen gibt es https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:building=riding_hall
aufachse (2023-05-23 11:26:08+00:00): Halla MatthiasGr21,

habe die Änderungen in deinem Changeset komplett rückgängig gemacht. Da durch das Löschen Routenverbindungen zerstört wurden. Die Straße ist weiterhin vorhanden, kann halt temporär nicht befahren werden. Dies kann über das access-Tag gesteuert werden. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
user_5359 (2023-06-20 15:25:59+00:00): Hallo! Reicht dieser Artikel https://www.wuerzburgerleben.de/2023/06/20/mehr-frauennamen-strassennamen-wuerzburg-umstritten/ oder brauchst Du ein Foto?
WüMK23 (2023-06-21 04:40:29+00:00): Hallo,
würde mir nicht reichen.
Allerdings die Amtlichen Bekanntmachungen in der Mainpost vom 13.06.2023 schon.
Gültig sind die drei Namensänderungen seit dem 15.06.2023. Meine Korrekturen waren vorher. Trotzdem Danke.
gscscnd (2023-05-22 12:20:54+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/185871232
Dlaczego zmiana na highway=track? Czy to jest droga publiczna?
Interswd (2023-05-24 08:53:29+00:00): tak, jest to publiczne, aczkolwiek leśna droga polna, tak jak oznaczyłem.
gscscnd (2023-05-24 10:44:40+00:00): Ludzie jeżdżą tam samochodami? Jeśli bywa choćby kilka samochodów w ciągu dnia, to bym podniósł do unclassified. Jeśli nie, to przynajmniej trzeba dodać access=yes, bo domyślnie track niekoniecznie jest używany przez rutery.
eggie (2023-05-22 06:59:39+00:00): Top!

Zou als ik jou was even naar Umap kijken.
Dan heb je OSM als achtergrond, maar voor je plannen een eigen layer.
http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/nl/ voor eigen layer in OSM 

groet
eggie
tg4567 (2023-05-27 14:07:49+00:00): Hello Evan, thanks for your contributions!  One suggestion: when you add parking places like this, can you also tag them as "access=private".  Otherwise it means that anyone can park here.  If I remember this area right, that is not the case here.
Evan Carroll (2023-05-27 14:16:04+00:00): Happy to do that. I also know better, and should have done that. ;) my bad. good catch.
tg4567 (2023-05-27 15:22:51+00:00): no worries, happy mapping!
rodolfovargas (2023-05-23 13:08:45+00:00): Hola Wilfredo Jordan.
Agradecido por sus aportes a OpenStreetMap.
Para enriquecer el mapeo, puede aplicar MAPILLARY para colectar datos. 
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.mapillary.app
Saludos.
jb54osm (2023-05-22 11:03:05+00:00): Hi,
But you didn't include the exceptions for bikes, mopeds and mofas :-( . Always check for these vehicles in The Netherlands. 
I'll add the exceptions.
NastassiaKalesnikava (2023-05-22 11:38:36+00:00): Hello!
Yes, I did not include them in the tagging...Thank you very much for your corrections!
MxxCon (2023-05-23 03:53:26+00:00): This seo spam reverted due to editor's incompetence which made the data less accurate.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136436712
OSM_RogerWilco (2023-05-23 10:48:07+00:00): Sieht gut aus. Danke! :-)
Hufkratzer (2023-05-22 23:30:58+00:00): Hi,
Gebäude sollten ein building=* Tag haben, sonst werden sie auf der Karte nicht als Gebäude dargestellt. leisure=horse_riding sollte nicht für einzelne Teile (z.B. Gebäude) einer Reitanlage, sondern für die Reitanlage insgesamt nur einmal verwendet werden, siehe
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure=horse_riding
und z.B. hier:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/172452712

Ein ähnliches Problem von vor 2 Jahren:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/221042169/history
josmougn (2023-11-18 15:52:34+00:00): bonjour,
il n'y a pas de panneau voie verte Chemin des Champcueils (en réalité Chemin de Corbeil) et Chemin de Corbeil, c'est abusif de mettre foot et bicycle designated.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29984062
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29984147
mga_geo (2023-05-22 14:40:30+00:00): Bonjour,
Encore deux relations cassées (r11920350,r11920352) par une intervention mapbox.
Marc
kolasau (2023-05-23 08:05:50+00:00): Hello, mga_geo.
Thank you for your feedback, everything is fixed. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136443534
MxxCon (2023-05-23 03:53:27+00:00): This seo spam reverted due to editor's incompetence which made the data less accurate.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136436712
user_5359 (2023-05-24 07:31:47+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1174948765. what is the mean of the tag th_name: = เดชะรินทร์? Is this the name in another language. Please use name:th (name:<language code>
mcliquid (2023-05-22 09:37:25+00:00): Isn't it duplicated with the watering place?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10759160720
Meinrad Samuel (2023-05-22 17:13:38+00:00): You are right!
I was hiking with Organic Map and it wasn’t rendered. Apparently because the watering place was tagged as only for animals. I also added amenity=drinking_water . Is that correct then? If so, i will delete this one
mcliquid (2023-05-23 06:49:57+00:00): Thanks for clarification, I've already deleted the second one. "amenity=drinking_water" sounds good.
Glassman (2023-05-23 19:51:07+00:00): #TIP: sand boxes can be tagged as leisure=playground + playground=sandpit. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:playground
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136399497
eggie (2023-05-22 08:31:57+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-05-22 08:44:46+00:00): Sander...  De schoolinfo heb ik overgezet naar de adresnode en amenity=school toegevoegd. Dat maakt het vindbaar als je scholen zoekt.
MVG
eggie
SanderHolthaus (2023-05-22 09:53:51+00:00): Thanks, sorry, ik moet nog even puzzelen hoe het exact werkt :-(
eggie (2023-05-22 10:07:19+00:00): No problem...
Scholen kan op meer manieren.
Zelfs op het schoolterrein zelf.
Zie wiki..
gr eggie
CrazyKim117 (2023-05-29 12:43:21+00:00): Looks very nice
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-24 13:26:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 136499552 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed import.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7139
NorthCrab_upload (2023-05-22 08:10:14+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10917693521

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Glassman (2023-05-23 19:55:09+00:00): #TIP: having the footway connect to the street allows routers to provide multimodal routing instructions. Note that in some cities with separately mapped sidewalks that isn't necessary.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136399893
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-24 13:22:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 136499552 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed import.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7139
eggie (2023-05-22 08:39:31+00:00): Sander... Je parking heb ik even losgemaakt van het pad. 
Gr eggie
SanderHolthaus (2023-05-22 09:55:57+00:00): OK, thanks. Weet even niet  in hoe verre je alles precies op elkaar moet laten aansluiten. Vaak liggen er ook nog stoepjes en voetpaden tussen, maar dan word het wat veel van het goede.
eggie (2023-05-22 10:14:02+00:00): Osm is net rijstebrij in het begin.

De hoofdregel is dat we wegen loslaten van vlakken. Bewerken wordt anders later lastig en als je iets verschuift komt de rest ongewenst mee.
Die parkeermogelijkheden worden ook wel in twee aparte den geplits met
parking=street_side en orientation=perpendicular
Dan krijg je ook kleinere P's in de wijk.
Bij de school heb iets als voorbeeld ingetekend.
Mapse
eggie
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-19 18:55:54+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1171308448/history has access:psv = yes that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
Would using psv access tag (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:psv ) be fitting at least equally well?

Usage statistics are sometimes wrong and should not be blindly followed, but are worth looking at - see http://taghistory.raifer.tech/#***/psv/&***/access%3Apsv/
G24kt (2024-05-19 19:44:24+00:00): this road is only for psv,bus.What is the problem
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-19 20:48:25+00:00): access:psv=yes seems not needed duplicate of psv=yes here

would it be OK to remove it?
G24kt (2024-05-19 21:22:19+00:00): Ok but how to prevent the navigator from directing along this road
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-19 22:31:56+00:00): For which routing it should be prevented and it is not right now?

access:psv is unlikely to be interpreted anyway, and psv=yes is present anyway so it is about something a bit different anyway
G24kt (2024-05-20 04:30:04+00:00): Remove
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-24 13:25:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 136499552 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed import.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7139
Supaplex (2023-05-22 08:22:37+00:00): 住安區->住宅區
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136400198
Carto'Cité (2023-08-11 12:36:24+00:00): Bonjour tanemika,
Le trottoir était bien décrit comme cyclable justement avec le bicycle=designated. Mais en l'absence d'une signalétique vertical qui le justifierai, on le laisse bien en path et pas en cycleway. N’hésite pas à me contacter si tu as la moindre question ou remarque. 🙂
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
Carto'Cité (2023-08-11 12:51:20+00:00): J'ai aussi ajouté les panneaux C113 qu'on peut voir dans Mapillary :
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=48.908469398217&lng=2.0425060689067&z=17&pKey=773539780018393&focus=photo
Charles
JDu7 (2023-05-22 09:14:07+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136403058
NorthCrab_upload (2023-05-22 08:20:23+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/383346872
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/383346876

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eggie (2023-05-22 08:36:48+00:00): Dag Sander... Wellicht de straatnaam nog?

MVG
eggie
pitfire (2023-05-22 10:40:13+00:00): Hallo Peter,

beim "Knoten: 2333525235" gefällt mir mein eigener Eintrag immer noch nicht so richtig. Im Grunde ist das kein "amenity=ferry_terminal" sonder ein reines industrial terminal
einer privaten Fa. als Anleger, z.B. für Baggerschiffe. Dazu finde ich aber unter "seamark:harbour:category" lediglich "Local authority/ port service support base ".
A place where vessels from different authorities or port service vessels are stationed. 
Möglicherweise hast Du eine bessere Idee.

Gruß Peter
Sandal man (2023-09-14 20:44:03+00:00): I think you mean highway= residential, please don't use "road"
Johnbo (2023-09-14 22:34:59+00:00): Uso road porque no es una zona urbana, sino de campo y chalés, y no conozco cómo es el firme de la calzada. Lo que sí que conozco es el carril aledaño (que lleva al salón de bodas) y es de arena y está además en un estado pésimo, lleno de baches. 

Si utilizase highway=residential estaría dando por hecho algo que no conozco, así que prefiero añadir la carretera con una clasificación más vaga y que al menos permita enrutar las zonas que aparecían inconexas.

Si tú conoces personalmente la zona y sabes que son calles residenciales: adelante, haz el cambio que consideres oportuno. Yo seguiré prefiriendo poner un dato incompleto a uno incorrecto.
Sandal man (2023-09-15 07:28:28+00:00): Hola Johnbo

Si hay casas se puede utilizar residencial, si el camino a otro pueblo no está clasificado.
Puede indicar la superficie de la carretera con una etiqueta separada.

Pero si prefieres utilizar la carretera, no es malo.
httpss://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:highway%3Dresidential
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:surface

Un Saludo
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-24 13:21:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 136499552 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed import.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7139
nick-28 (2023-05-22 14:31:03+00:00): Hallo LutWeb,

ich kommentiere diesen CS, weil Du darum gebeten hast.
Folgende zwei Punkte fallen mir auf:
1) Bei Nr 25/27 scheint es sich um ein Doppelhaus zu handeln. Da sollte man entweder zwei Umringungen einzeichnen und die die Nummern entsprechend vergeben, oder, wenn die Trennlinie nicht klar erkennbar ist, die Eingänge einzeichnen und die Adressen da dran hängen (entrance=main). In jedem Fall sollte man das Gebäude als building=semi-detached house taggen.
2) Du hast die Tags für die Arztpraxis direkt an den Hausumriss gehängt. Dagegen ist prinzipiell nichts einzuwenden, wenn die Praxis das gesamte Haus einnimmt. Wenn auch noch Wohnungen und/oder andere Praxen, Büros o.ä. vorhanden sind sollte man auf jeden Fall einen zusätzlichen POI (point of interest) innerhalb der Umringung einzeichnen und die Informationen da unterbringen. Das ist auch deshalb günstig, weil bei enem Umzug dann einfach der POI verschoben werden kann, der ist ja nicht mit dem Haus verknüpft.

Soweit meine Tipps. 
Gruß, Nick
LutWeb (2023-05-24 11:01:46+00:00): Danke für die Hinweise, habe sie eingearbeitet.
LG Lutz
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-24 13:23:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 136499552 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed import.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7139
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-24 13:21:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 136499552 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed import.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7139
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-24 13:32:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 136499552 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed import.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7139
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-24 13:28:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 136499552 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed import.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7139
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-24 13:24:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 136499552 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed import.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7139
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-24 13:27:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 136499552 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed import.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7139
Hufkratzer (2023-05-22 23:05:46+00:00): Hi,
You have removed the tag building=yes from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/854870314; therefore this area is no longer rendered as a building on the map.
If this building is a riding hall / indoor arena you can use the tag https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:building=riding_hall instead of building=yes.
The tag https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:leisure=horse_riding is not really appropriate for a riding hall, it is for the whole riding centre like here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/285568173
joost schouppe (2023-09-25 08:33:27+00:00): They also added a diplomatic office here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/837521686 ...
Osmwithspace (2023-07-21 11:28:59+00:00): Hier sind wieder lauter Überlappungen. Da wo die Straße ist, ist keine "landuse=*"! Schaust du nochmal danach?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136401795