piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
literan (2026-03-05 19:48:41+00:00): Название памятника указывается в следующем формате[1]:

если памятник имеет имя собственное (например, node «Тысячелетие России»), то в теге name в любом случае указывается именно оно: name=Тысячелетие России.
если памятник имени собственного не имеет, то указывается name без слова «памятник/стела/бюст/…», например:
name=Воинам-интернационалистам,
name=Жертвам политических репрессий.
Если он посвящён (установлен в память об) определённой личности, в теге name указывается фамилия с инициалами в дательном падеже:
name=В. И. Ленину. После точек при этом желателен узкий неразрывный пробел либо хотя бы обычный неразрывный пробел (alt + 255 на боковой клавиатуре).
Дополнительно, независимо от того, имеет ли памятник имя собственное или нет, указывается, кому (или чему) он посвящён, причем ФИО человека указывается развернуто в именительном падеже:
memorial:subject=Владимир Ильич Ленин.
empty_child (2026-03-05 20:28:15+00:00): Конечно, решение по дательному падежу принималось людьми, не пытавшимся ранее склонять иностранные имена в русском :)
literan (2026-03-06 07:50:09+00:00): мне кажется, памятников иностранцам в стране исчезающе мало. В Мособласти ни одного не могу припомнить
NeisBot (2026-03-04 20:18:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13458628502 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Bail bond office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-13 05:33:21+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179789168
(Restore previous tags. Same version)

If you believe this was incorrect or would like to clarify the intent of the original tags, please reply here.
007Transformer (2026-03-05 06:23:53+00:00):  Partially reverted in changeset id:179380078
NieWnen (2026-07-15 17:48:55+00:00): Cześć,
coś tutaj chyba tutaj poszło nie tak z addr:housenumber
Raczej nie wygląda na prawidłową wartość.
NieWnen (2026-07-15 17:50:26+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13618707340

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13618707339
Wally_PL (2026-07-15 19:29:46+00:00): Cześć, taki jest adres korespondencyjny w obu przypadkach. Wygląda dziwnie, aczkolwiek budynek biura nie ma nadanego numeru.
NieWnen (2026-07-15 19:38:01+00:00): Pokażesz gdzie taki jest? Nie wszystko musi mieć adres ogólnie. 

Jak takowego nie mają to nie trzeba dodawać.

A jak nie mają nadanego numeru to tym bardziej bym nie dodawał opisu  do tego tagu. Można dać nohousenumber=yes
Wally_PL (2026-07-15 19:43:42+00:00): Np. tu:
https://www.lubelskie.kas.gov.pl/lubelski-urzad-celno-skarbowy-w-bialej-podlaskiej/kontakt/dane-teleadresowe/-/asset_publisher/t2eC/content/oddzial-celny-w-hrebennem?redirect=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lubelskie.kas.gov.pl%2Flubelski-urzad-celno-skarbowy-w-bialej-podlaskiej%2Fkontakt%2Fdane-teleadresowe%3Fp_p_id%3D101_INSTANCE_t2eC%26p_p_lifecycle%3D0%26p_p_state%3Dnormal%26p_p_mode%3Dview%26p_p_col_id%3Dcolumn-2%26p_p_col_pos%3D1%26p_p_col_count%3D2
NieWnen (2026-07-15 19:57:48+00:00): Dla mnie to jest bardziej nazwa/opis miejsca lokalizacji niż numer :P
Wally_PL (2026-07-15 20:18:51+00:00): Numerem na pewno to nie jest. :)
Niemniej, tak brzmi pełny adres Oddziału Celnego.
NeisBot (2026-03-04 20:36:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/37552654 v8

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Bar and grill"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-13 05:33:22+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179789169
(Restore previous tags. Same version)

If you believe this was incorrect or would like to clarify the intent of the original tags, please reply here.
NeisBot (2026-03-04 20:39:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13618618255 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Consignment shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-13 05:33:24+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179789171
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
Kovoschiz (2026-03-05 08:02:12+00:00): 1. When the estate is simply number on street, it should be `noname=yes` , as there's no difference with the addressing. Only styled ones eg `=328 Clear Water Bay` should be accepted. 
2. Blocks in estate use `addr:street` + `addr:housenumber=` + `addr:unit=`
NeisBot (2026-03-04 21:00:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13577696264 v4

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Flooring store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-13 05:33:25+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179789172
(Restore previous tags. Same version)

If you believe this was incorrect or would like to clarify the intent of the original tags, please reply here.
Rambling Banjo (2026-03-04 21:02:12+00:00): Very approximate due to no up-to-date satellite imagery.
Baloo Uriza (2026-03-04 23:44:03+00:00): The "Avenue" almost always comes before "East" in the name, even if we usually short_name it 86th East...
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179368850
Rambling Banjo (2026-03-05 00:33:06+00:00): Is that a OpenStreetMap labeling convention? If so, could you provide a link to the documentation please? I would like to provide high quality edits, but the street is labeled South 86th East Avenue not South 86th Avenue East.
Baloo Uriza (2026-03-05 01:09:07+00:00): No, it's literally how the street's named.  Bixby and Tulsa just tend to have inconsistently crap signage.  Within BA, Tulsa and Bixby, everything starts with North/South and ends with East/West, with the name sandwiched in between.
JJIglesias (2026-03-05 03:12:16+00:00): Saludos y disculpa pero este mala NO es para hacer trabajos ni practicas universitarias agregando elementos inventados. Todo aporte al mapa es bienvenido pero no esta permitido agregar elementos inexistentes en la vida real.
Por lo que este elemento deberá ser borrado.
Gracias
Senihtu (2026-03-09 05:35:06+00:00): Hi!
Da Du häufiger in der Gegend zu sein scheinst:
Auf der Alexander-von-Humboldt-Straße ist eine Straßensperre eingezeichnet an der die Busse nicht vorbeikommen. (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9615315619)
Ist die noch da oder kann man sie löschen?
Happy mapping!
Kovoschiz (2026-03-05 08:04:17+00:00): `=house` is a single home. Multiple homes should be `=terrace`
Wildsharky (2026-03-06 04:04:59+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: 179388577
NeisBot (2026-03-04 21:51:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13618913498 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Bar and grill"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-13 05:33:28+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179789173
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
NeisBot (2026-03-04 21:54:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/1464977962 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Art supply store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-13 05:33:28+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179789174
(Restore previous tags. Same version)

If you believe this was incorrect or would like to clarify the intent of the original tags, please reply here.
NeisBot (2026-03-04 22:00:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13439901560 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Auto repair shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-13 05:33:29+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179789175
(Restore previous tags. Same version)

If you believe this was incorrect or would like to clarify the intent of the original tags, please reply here.
NeisBot (2026-03-04 22:03:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13436104570 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Auto body shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-13 05:33:30+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179789177
(Restore previous tags. Same version)

If you believe this was incorrect or would like to clarify the intent of the original tags, please reply here.
Baloo Uriza (2026-03-04 22:20:01+00:00): Thanks for the heads up, I'm taking a look at this in JOSM now since this is going to be next to impossible to fix in id.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179370984
Linus W Frische (2026-03-11 15:19:12+00:00): Re: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13619010398 og https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13619010399

Thomasminde er tilføjet her: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1448395166

Re: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12848656390

Den har ikke noget egentlig "navn" så "Foodbank i Bethelkirken" er mere en beskrivelse end et navn.
NeisBot (2026-03-04 22:12:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13520478849 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Countertop store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-13 05:33:30+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179789178
(Restore previous tags. Same version)

If you believe this was incorrect or would like to clarify the intent of the original tags, please reply here.
NeisAgent (2026-03-05 07:00:48+00:00): 🕵 The changeset tags appear to reference Google Maps or another Google mapping service as a data source.

Please note that using Google Maps, Google Street View, or similar Google services as a mapping source is not allowed in OpenStreetMap due to license restrictions.

More information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google

If the data in this changeset was derived from Google Maps or another incompatible source, the edits may need to be reverted.

If this is a misunderstanding and the data was collected from permitted sources (e.g. local survey, Bing imagery, local knowledge, etc.), please clarify in a reply.
Vadim_Sichkaruk (2026-03-05 07:23:43+00:00): Hello! 
This was my own knowledge and verified via Google Street View. That is, Street View was used for data verification, not search.
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-05 07:50:40+00:00): Thanks for your reply.

Just a quick note, as the bot already mentioned: unfortunately Google Street View cannot be used for verifying or deriving data for OSM, because its imagery is covered by Google's license, which is incompatible with OSM. 

This means that even using it only for verification is not permitted.
Vadim_Sichkaruk (2026-03-05 07:54:11+00:00): Ok, thank you! I will take this into account.
Dindia (2026-06-01 19:41:25+00:00): Hi!

Is way 138614346 really paved with asphalt?
MFlamm (2026-03-06 11:02:07+00:00): Re-bonjour, j'ai remarqué plusieurs problèmes dans ce changeset:
1) Es-tu sûr que la villa située au 27 Amandolier a été détruite (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/85558203/history)? Il y a quelques semaines, je suis passé sur place et cette villa ne semblait pas être vouée à la destruction.
2) Les formes des nouveaux bâtiments sont déjà disponibles sur le SITG, donc l'idéal serait de les copier directement à partir de cette couche en libre service: https://map.sitg.ge.ch/app/?portalresources=CAD_BATIMENT_HORSOL
3) C'est un peu étrange d'avoir laissé les clôtures des anciens jardins...
9_tab (2026-03-06 12:48:47+00:00): 1) Je vais vérifier et corriger. Merci.
2) Si on peut l'utiliser, ça serait bien de l'avoir en iD editor et les rajouter, car ils existent déjà, en partie habités.
3) J'ai laissé la subdivision, comme les nouveaux le suivent partiellement.
MFlamm (2026-03-06 17:38:38+00:00): A ma connaissance, on ne peut pas intégrer des couches vectorielles dans iD. Il faudrait évtl. voir si tu arrives à intégrer le fonds de plan SITG, qui comprend en partie les bâtiments existants.
Du coup, j'ai intégré les tracés des bâtiments en utilisant JOSM. J'ai aussi ajouté les murs/façades qui bordent l'Avenue Amandolier ainsi que quelques éléments de circulation pour les piétons...
Enfin, j'ai remis les deux maisons anciennes qui à mon avis devraient encore exister (Amandolier 27 et Charles-Martin 22). Si tu constates sur place qu'elles ont été détruites, merci de mettre "demolished:" devant le tag building.
9_tab (2026-03-06 18:31:02+00:00): Merci. Vérification faite, ça y est encore. La numérotation et les accès aux immeubles sont un peu particuliers.
pwbriggs (2026-03-05 23:24:58+00:00): Hey https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/lebedits!

Please don't feel like we're trying to push you out; many experienced users simply have set up tools to notify us about a new user's first few edits in an area. Then we can review new users' changes and help out by providing any feedback. We know that OpenStreetMap can have quite a bit of a learning curve, and we want to ensure that data is high-quality.

Feel free to reach out anytime if you have questions!
Vaidotas (2026-03-06 16:34:35+00:00): Why "Tibeto skveras" was duplicated as smaller area, while it is already mapped - https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4199595 ?
Monolo23 (2026-03-06 21:21:27+00:00): My bad, i didn't see that was already mapped
I'll fix it
Monolo23 (2026-03-06 21:28:23+00:00): Is it really all that big green zone the tibeto skveras? I mean there's no sign in the street that says that the north part across the street is the square.
On the Uzupis site and maps, the Tibeto Skveras is only the lower part.
Vaidotas (2026-03-11 06:49:16+00:00): You are right, according to geoportal.lt data this square is only the lower part. Thank you for fixing it.
eggie (2026-03-04 22:43:25+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
LachlanTansey2009 (2026-03-04 22:51:29+00:00): The changeset description is supposed to say Glen Waverley Line track ways, not Pakenham Line track ways.
pwbriggs (2026-03-05 23:46:19+00:00): What does this edit do? As a reviewer, it's helpful to know your intent.

Thanks!
lebedits (2026-03-06 11:25:03+00:00): Adds residential area and woods
NeisBot (2026-03-04 22:57:47+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/12972803302 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "information point"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-13 05:33:31+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179789180
(Restore previous tags. Same version)

If you believe this was incorrect or would like to clarify the intent of the original tags, please reply here.
Till_btn (2026-03-12 18:39:03+00:00): Woher kommen deine Infos zum Graffitti "Die große Welle" (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13619098647), wie kommst du auf Jan Balyon? Kurze Recherche ergibt "Faith47": https://www.abendblatt.de/region/article107570370/Street-Art-Eine-ganze-Stadt-wird-zum-Atelier.html
NGL-engel (2026-03-14 23:01:43+00:00): Hallo Till,
auch hier bin ich leider einer Online-Quelle aufgesessen. Ich kann dir leider nicht mehr genau sagen, woher die Information kam. Ich hatte es zwar als „fixme=” gemappt, aber inzwischen vermute ich selber, dass es nur im Stil von „Jan Balyon – Die große Welle” ist und nicht von ihm selbst. 
Der Eintrag war also falsch, ich habe ihn gerade angepasst. Danke dir für den Hinweis. 
Gruß, Angela
Sylabowy Kot (2026-04-04 07:24:28+00:00): Zestaw zmian wycofałem w całości: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180840095
Dokumentacja budowlana nie jest źródłem informacji, że odbywa się budowa. Dosyć często się o tym mówi w temacie dróg. Ograniczajmy się z mapowaniem rzeczy w budowie póki nie widać jakichkolwiek oznak takiego obiektu.
Yog Sot (2026-03-23 16:16:11+00:00): jak robisz te granice, to serio mógłbyś robic to prawidłowo i np nie łączyć ich ze ścieżkami tworząc np bród na https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13619117520/history
❤️‍🔥 (2026-03-05 12:20:49+00:00): thanks for all your edits! not sure if you're aware, but mapping details of bus depots somewhat helps AT's staff, since their software seems to use OpenStreetMap as a basemap - see timecode 00:10 in this video:  https://facebook.com/reel/780615961728556

so keep up the good work :)
Wildsharky (2026-03-06 04:05:42+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: 179393603
pwbriggs (2026-03-05 23:07:18+00:00): Thanks. Just to confirm, is this camera manufactured by Flock Safety, or is is a generic license plate reader or conventional traffic camera? I'm asking because with all the media attention on Flock, some people aren't aware of the distinction between different types of traffic control devices and/or surveillance equipment, so they add details that aren't correct.

Thanks again for your contributions and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
NeisBot (2026-03-05 00:21:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 35 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1443963063 v1 | 10 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/13250092549 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179373752
007Transformer (2026-03-05 05:30:34+00:00):  Revert of 179373752
Warin61 (2026-03-05 00:34:32+00:00): Changeset comment should be
Resolve 'Moore Guy' from relation into simple way. 
Source - OSMInspector, OSM, bing
jwheare (2026-03-05 09:54:31+00:00): Thanks for your contributions. I notice several bus stops were removed that still appear to exist on street view. Just checking this was done deliberately and if there's a source for the removals. Your edit showed up on https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious#10/52.6826/-1.6802
Kenz :3 (2026-03-05 14:31:42+00:00): I live in this area, I removed the stops deliberately as they haven't been serviced by a bus in at least the last 5 years
There are also several stops which no longer have signage and haven't existed in 10 years
jwheare (2026-03-05 14:43:57+00:00): All good, accidental deletions are easy to do so just making sure. Good edits. There's a tag disused:highway=bus_stop that can be used where the street furniture/signage remains. It can be useful to prevent people from adding them back to the map.
Langlaeufer (2026-03-05 08:58:58+00:00): Hi, ich hab mal access auf dem Schulbusbahnhof korrigiert. Es gibt kein motor_vehicle=bus (bus ist kein Zweck sondern eine Fahrzeugart und gehört nach vorne. auch psv=yes ist falsch. Das beinhaltet Taxis, die sind hier nicht zugelassen. 
https://trafficsigns.osm-verkehrswende.org/DE?signs=DE:250,1024-14 
Die Zufahrt zum Parkplatz musst auch noch ausgenommen werden: dort dürfen auch Pkw fahren.
Grüße Langläufer
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179374299
Tamani Wolf (2026-03-05 21:34:35+00:00): Moin, ich danke dir fürs drauf hinweisen. Das zu psv auch Taxen dazu zählen hatte ich in diesen Moment nicht mehr auf dem Schirm. Den Bereich Lachendorf werde ich mir die Tage noch mal genauer anschauen.
Gruß Tamani
ajmat (2026-03-05 16:53:05+00:00): Reverted in changeset id: 179361973