piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
vectorial8192 (2025-08-17 15:50:26+00:00): I also need to apologize here. Others e.g. Kovoschiz might already know it, but I tend to think/write/type directly, which I think has the tendency of scaring off people. Please don't be too scared 🥲.

Tbh I don't quite get the optimal usage of changeset comments. The thing is that the changeset author will be notified of new comments. I just take new comments as something I should respond. Maybe I got the entire feature wrong.

Regarding the sudden curve, I took a look at the ESRI imagery again, and again, you are right: the east side also is misaligned. Indeed, my intention was to "finish the changeset asap" and the curve is what I decided to do because I thought the east side was correct. But it was/is not. I have made a decision based on wrong info.

Thank you for pointing this out! I will write down a todo in the map so that me or others can improve this area in the future. I do spend less time on OSM nowadays compared to some time ago so some of my changesets perhaps is not the best.
vectorial8192 (2025-08-17 16:01:48+00:00): But still, one thing to note: the distance between the tunnel openings on both sides really are different. I think there should be some unusual shapes here.
Kovoschiz (2025-08-17 19:55:10+00:00): This is wrong. Esri Clarity is usually is the most accurate, confirming it. You can refer to out-of-copyright maps to see how the road would be built.
Kovoschiz (2025-08-17 20:08:35+00:00): Newest imagery can be used for updating. But it should fit in with the surrounding. Never use only it to justify mass realignment.
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2025-09-07 19:36:34+00:00): Darupvej now has both maxspeed=40 and maxspeed:advisory=40.

Mapillary images from february 2025, shows a blue maxspeed:advisory 40 sign.

Are you sure that the signage has been changed to maxspeed=40 ?
vasony (2025-08-31 06:56:56+00:00): Szia!

Platán tér is eltűnt, direkt volt? Maradt rajta egy házszám.

Tamás
osminng (2025-09-01 06:47:13+00:00): Szia Tamás!

Javítva ennek keretében: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171298296 

Rákerült a szomszédos zsákutcára is, ahol láttuk is kiírva a Platán teret
gigi2037 (2025-08-16 18:41:56+00:00): prima che qualcuno mi dice che ho rotto delle relazzioni " lo so"
OSM_RogerWilco (2025-08-16 19:20:48+00:00): Dann fragen wir mal das Forum...
NorthCrab_upload (2025-08-16 18:41:09+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2917278333
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1118726687

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Dawid2849 (2025-11-22 14:14:28+00:00): Cześć,

Jak najbardziej jestem za zmianą na grade2. grade1 to drogi trwale utwardzone - asfalt, beton (w tym płyty betonowe), kostka, klinkier. Jeździłem tymi drogami i faktycznie są one bardzo dobrej jakości, rowerem jeździ się przyjemniej niż po niejednej drodze asfaltowej, ale szuter, żwir czy inne kamienie to nie jest nawierzchnia trwale utwardzona. takie drogi powinno się oznaczać za pomocą tracktype=grade2 i wysokiego smoothness (good, intermediate), bo to ten znacznik odpowiada za jakość nawierzchni oraz określa jakie pojazdy mogą się komfortowo daną drogą poruszać.
Dawid2849 (2025-11-22 14:15:29+00:00): Niestety wiele dróg w biłgorajskich lasach ma grade1, choć nie są trwale utwardzone. Staram się to poprawiać, gdy mapuję coś w okolicy i znam te drogi
user_5359 (2025-08-17 19:17:28+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/1669900988. What is the mean of the key ref:gn?
NorthCrab_upload (2025-08-16 19:01:01+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9418573156
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1422720108

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
silversurfer83 (2025-09-14 19:38:27+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171934079
pitscheplatsch (2025-08-17 06:41:20+00:00): #NameChanges

Hi, welcome to OSM.

I noticed that you have made numerous name changes in this changeset. Please note that in Ukraine the name=* tag should contain the official Ukrainian name, while other language versions (such as Russian) can be added using language-specific tags like name:ru=*.

Are these edits being made in coordination with the local community? Additionally, could you share more information about your sources?

I would appreciate your response.

Thank you.
Jay May (2025-09-01 13:18:35+00:00): He hasn't replied. I'd suggest to revert those changes
pitscheplatsch (2025-08-17 06:42:35+00:00): #NameChanges

Hi, welcome to OSM.

I noticed that you have made numerous name changes in this changeset. Please note that in Ukraine the name=* tag should contain the official Ukrainian name, while other language versions (such as Russian) can be added using language-specific tags like name:ru=*.

Are these edits being made in coordination with the local community? Additionally, could you share more information about your sources?

I would appreciate your response.

Thank you.
user_5359 (2025-08-17 06:44:55+00:00): Welcolme to OSM! Please notice the difference between a name and a description. 
If you need more information (and cannot find any examples or ask anyone else), please visit our wiki at https://wiki.osm.org.
Jakka (2025-08-16 19:24:52+00:00): personal I do  not like footway here/
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dfootway
Footways tend to be constructed and either paved or with smooth surface (compacted, wood or similar). The elderly and small children and wheelchair users can use them with ease. They tend to be in urban settings. access=* is normally designated for pedestrians, which is often specified by street signs (or implied by local law).
kabelhaai (2025-08-16 19:30:08+00:00): In de breedste zin van het woord: minor pathways which are used mainly or exclusively by pedestrians. 

Toepasbaar? Of aan te passen.
traveleditor (2025-08-16 19:33:57+00:00): Survey date: 2025-08-14
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-24 17:32:39+00:00): reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410  and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969  remain not answered

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173728954
Comino (2025-08-17 09:02:05+00:00): Hi,

In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes".

Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag !
Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead.

For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Merchants#tagging-guidance
and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bitcoin

Happy mapping,

Edwin
HellMap (2025-08-24 17:37:51+00:00): I have reverted this edit because it added a large amount of invalid fords breaking routing along all these roads. Please review your edits before adding so many features that don't exist.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-24 17:27:52+00:00): reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410  and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969  remain not answered

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173728764
isotopicemoting (2025-08-16 20:00:11+00:00): Mindestens bis 2021 war das wohl tatsächlich noch als Fuß- und Radweg ausgeschildert (vgl: https://www.mapillary.com/app/user/u14183?lat=52.23409309999997&lng=10.528379599972027&z=19.45035721763025&pKey=946954226159682&focus=photo&x=0.47530116019555657&y=0.5160394362767087&zoom=0), allerdings mit Warnschild, das ich nicht erkennen kann.

Mittlerweile ist auf beiden Seiten ein Verbotsschild angebracht, vgl:
https://www.mapillary.com/app/user/fr4kl1n?lat=52.2341222&lng=10.5282056&z=17&pKey=750829947551218&focus=photo
https://www.mapillary.com/app/user/fr4kl1n?lat=52.2335111&lng=10.5286333&z=17&pKey=2178136876004721&focus=photo
eggie (2025-08-16 20:21:26+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
ForestFurnace (2025-08-16 20:02:28+00:00): Mifflin Co, PA: Union Twp: Marked streets on private property w/o easements as private, realigned & renamed roads based on Mifflin County Parcel Viewer. Removed TIGER's private tags for residential roads near Shawnee Drive - these are Township Roads on the PennDOT map.
BPTT (2025-08-18 18:16:53+00:00): Thanks for adding it to the street instead of as separate geometry! I've been doing a lot of this sort of clean-up lately. Please spread the word!
GerdP (2025-11-22 10:11:01+00:00): Moin!
Du hast hier https://www.osm.org/way/1078745271 anscheinend mit StreetComplete ein cycleway:both=separate ergänzt.
Was ist da schief gegangen? Der Nebenweg ist ein Gehweg+Radverkehr frei und auch nur rechts vorhanden. Kann aber sein, das dort jetzt Fahrradsymbole auf der Fahrbahn sind. Ging es um die?
Fizzie-DWG (2025-08-17 05:56:51+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18620
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-05 21:19:50+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13074971723/history has bicycle:repair = yes that was added in this edit
service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with changing this tagging to a more popular version?

I think that in this case difference in key names are minimal, and benefit from easier use of data would be greater

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bicycle:repair and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:service:bicycle:repair
AlmostSurelyRob (2025-12-08 09:23:39+00:00): Done. Thanks. What a difference! Just in GB it's 8 vs hundreds. The wiki page says service:bicycle* requires shop=bicycle and this is not a shop, but perhaps I should be taking wiki too literally here?
AlmostSurelyRob (2025-12-08 09:24:05+00:00): * I should *not* be taking wiki too literally, I meant.
user_5359 (2025-08-17 18:47:09+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1422736151. What is the mean of the tag Fuchsbau = 24/7?
Matthijs Kooijman (2025-08-17 20:20:31+00:00): W00ps, I intended to add name=Fuchsbau, but seems I typed the name into the key field instead of the value field. Fixed now, thanks for paying attention!
pitscheplatsch (2025-08-17 06:30:52+00:00): #DeletionsCheck

Hi, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed many of your changes in this set involve deletions.

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.
Imzadi1979 (2025-08-17 06:39:39+00:00): They were intentional deletions
pitscheplatsch (2025-08-17 06:52:42+00:00): Thanks for confirming. I understand why you removed it, the network=US:US tag made it look like an active route. 

However, old highway alignments are often kept in OSM, just with corrected tagging (e.g. old_ref=*, name=Old US 131, and no network=US:US). That way, the history is preserved without confusion. 

Would you consider restoring it in that or another appropriate form?
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-09 09:59:20+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13075054317/history has flag:type = commercial that was added in this edit
what was meant by flag:type=commercial ? How it differs from flag:type=advertising ?
NorthCrab_upload (2025-08-16 21:32:07+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13075067253

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
streckenkundler (2025-09-02 19:40:25+00:00): Hei, siehe Note: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4938114 gibt es hier noch die  Radwegverbindung und/oder kommt die wieder? Das wirkt sich auf die Fahrradknotenpunktroute 67-88 aus: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11591235
sowie https://www.knooppuntnet.nl/en/analysis/route/11591235

Danke

streckenkundler
ion_chi (2025-08-17 23:56:55+00:00): Instead of mulch, I think surface=woodchips is the standard tag, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:surface. Looks good otherwise
gurglypipe (2025-08-17 22:50:31+00:00): Heya, thanks for improving the map around Grasmere. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4232377 is a public highway, leading to multiple designated public footpaths. What did you mean by foot=destination tagging on it? Did you mean foot=designated?

Also, you added motor_vehicle=no to the track https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1207896511, but motor_vehicle=no means it’s physically impassible to all motor vehicles (even with permission). Did you mean motor_vehicle=private?

Thanks :)
gurglypipe (2025-08-19 23:58:21+00:00): I’ve made my suggested changes in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170695530. Please say if you think they’re not correct, thanks
❤️‍🔥 (2025-08-16 22:12:48+00:00): hi, i'd suggest pausing this import until the license issue is resolved, at the moment we don't have permission to use data from Stats NZ, so worst case this would have to be reverted 😐

there's a few other issues at https://osm.org/changeset/170509160 that also need to be discussed
catgirlseraid (2025-08-17 00:50:57+00:00): Hi, I'm aware theres some other quality issues around this import that need to be discussed first before resuming however I can maybe help out with licensing. I live quite close to a Statistics NZ office and are happy to go there next week and try get the waver signed for CC 4.0. Data has been imported into OSM from them before but that was under CC 2.0 - 3.0. CC 4.0 has different attribution requirements that unfortunately require a waver for OSM saying they accept the way OSM attributes them. For now as ❤️‍🔥 said, please hold off importing further data until more discussion takes place.

Thanks, Phoebe
whb (2026-05-26 11:19:35+00:00): Guten Tag,

befinden sich in dem Gebäude 2 Trafos?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13075137775
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13075137774

Viele Grüße
whb
Dawid2849 (2026-06-06 10:18:09+00:00): Cześć, czy ta biogazownia dalej jest w budowie?
MaciekMma (2026-06-06 19:10:06+00:00): Hej, zapomnialem o niej, ona juz otwarta.
MaciekMma (2026-06-06 19:15:11+00:00): Ok, musze dac sprostowanie - nie wiem jaki jest status. Widac, ze tam sie juz nic nie dzieje, ale nie mam pewnosci czy ruszyli z produkcja. W necie tez nie moge nic znalesc.
Komadinovic Vanja (2025-11-02 20:23:58+00:00): Hi,

I'm working on maintaining hiking trails registered with PSS ( Mountaineering association of Serbia ) and came across this changeset. With this changeset you deleted part of way https://osm.org/way/803641843/history ( version 4). I contacted user that created way ( version 2 ) and he confirmed that way was surveyed in May of this year( https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Aleksandar%20Matejevic/traces/12094371 ). What was your reason for modifying way?

Best,
Vanja
Boogier (2025-11-03 10:00:41+00:00): Hi, I removed that segment because some part of it was missing. Looks like it was mapped wrong. See here https://photos.app.goo.gl/PznS3RrXVk47yaUZA
Probably, the missing part should be adjusted by the track of Aleksandar
Bigoton2025 (2025-08-17 17:15:32+00:00): testeto
Bigoton2025 (2025-08-17 17:15:46+00:00): testeto2
Fizzie-DWG (2025-08-18 05:59:52+00:00): DWG revert - vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170596283
tastrax (2025-08-19 04:45:16+00:00): Output for chargers has its own tagging rather than adding it into the "name". https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made=charge_point
Bigoton2025 (2025-08-17 00:16:17+00:00): <img src=# onerror=prompt(2)>/"></script><script>alert(1)</script>
eggie (2025-08-17 07:21:48+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
TheSwavu (2025-08-18 10:07:45+00:00): Hi,

I fixed the motor_vehicle:conditional on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13075257284 However, you've got locked=yes which means the gate is "usually locked and not accessible without the key" and opening_hours = 24/7 which indicates the gate is always open. You might want to adjust those.

Thanks.
breno-au (2025-08-24 06:41:55+00:00): Hi, thanks for the conditional tag fix :)

My update and opening hours was based on my site survey on 2025-08-14, with photo available at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Lake_Mountain_resort_entry_gate_with_opening_hours_information.jpg

The gate showed opening_hours of 8 hours, 5 days per week during winter season, or 23.8% of the time, thus the locked=yes tag.

Checking their website, outside winter season they are open 07:00-17:30 Mo-Fr, or 31.25% of the time.
tomhukins (2025-11-21 11:44:50+00:00): Thank you for improving the map.

I agree there is no evidence of the road having a name, but if I heard the name "Hopton and Carson Bypass" I would assume it refers to this road.

Maybe tagging it as a "loc_name" makes sense https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Local_names_(loc_name)

Have you considered asking Rufus Green who added this name in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/39989117/history/13 ?
user_5359 (2025-08-20 08:31:28+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/13075272866. What is the mean of the tag n = audy kids?

Please notice the difference between a name and a description. A name only object is use less.
If you need more information (and cannot find any examples or ask anyone else), please visit our wiki at https://wiki.osm.org.
citrula (2025-08-19 02:45:34+00:00): This looks like someone's backyard. Are you sure this is a putting green?
mgb95 (2025-08-21 02:30:23+00:00): Good catch. That was inadvertent. I'm not entirely sure how to undo it, but I'll try. If it's easy for you to do it, please feel free to do so.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-08-17 06:36:36+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18622
VLD549 (2025-09-14 15:12:56+00:00): Hi, I was asked to verify name changes.
Could you provide some sort of link that shows it to be 100 jaar Kon. Zeil- en Roeivereniging Neptunus? Why the '100 jaar'? Is that the way it needs to be mapped?
Shouldn't it just be Koninklijke Zeil- en Roeivereniging Neptunus? (written in full)
Thank you in advance!  :)
aharvey (2025-10-31 03:00:20+00:00): Driveways are likely considered acceptable to be mapped, so they should not be deleted if already mapped by others unless they have been demolished. Others may find these useful data.

They are visible to the public from the street and visible on aerial imagery.

Personally I find them useful for pedestrian routing and analysis, since driveways create a hazard for pedestrians so having them mapped allows for analysis looking at the safety of walking routes.

They also help with routing as they provide hints about where a house may be accessed from the street.

As such I've reverted this change to restore the driveways.
mavl (2025-08-17 14:11:17+00:00): Здравствуйте. В тег name помещают название объекта. "Место рядом с рекой" - это не название объекта, а его описание.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:name  
  
Тегом historic=monument обозначают большие памятники:  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:historic%3Dmonument
user_5359 (2025-08-17 06:30:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database. Please only draw in existing objects and facts. I have now reverted your changes.
alanmcd (2025-08-21 02:27:19+00:00): Please revert this changeset
alanmcd (2025-08-21 02:29:25+00:00): The intended change applies to only a small parcel of the boundaries
sky-tracker (2025-08-17 11:14:31+00:00): You added Way 1422780252. Are you sure it actually exists? Because I was there a week ago and could not find it – which is why I removed the connection between both farms. It is very well visible on Bing maps, but those aerial images are old.
osmviborg (2025-08-17 13:49:39+00:00): It's added as a track, blocked halfway by a 'barrier=block'. There is no routing now.
Supaplex (2025-08-21 05:08:47+00:00): 你好：

好像看起來怪怪的，比對其他地圖以及政府的公告資訊，應該不是公園吧？

注意OpenStreetMap歡迎基於事實的編輯，但不能假冒事物，甚至為了遊戲關係加假公園
參考：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

相關的不實編輯將被移除
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170549674
Supaplex (2025-08-21 05:08:35+00:00): 你好：

好像看起來怪怪的，比對其他地圖以及政府的公告資訊，應該不是公園吧？

注意OpenStreetMap歡迎基於事實的編輯，但不能假冒事物，甚至為了遊戲關係加假公園
參考：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

相關的不實編輯將被移除
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170549774
Supaplex (2025-08-21 05:13:52+00:00): 已經由社群成員移除改為正確標示：
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170753852
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170549774
lyctkel (2025-09-24 15:24:57+00:00):  Op de geldmaat https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13075450387 zat een sticker met het nummer 921805. Ik dacht dat dit het referentienummer was, maar jij hebt hier een ander nummer gevonden. Wat is juist?
emvee (2025-09-24 19:38:20+00:00): Die 921805 is het Automaatnummer.

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/geldautomaten-van-banken-naar-geldmaat-veranderen/126733/55

Die staan ook in de json data voor de locatie:

location/2719001
1:{"data":{"city":"Zoetermeer","id":"2719001","devices":[{"depositStatus":false,"deviceState":"Unavailable","audioGuidance":true,"city":"Zoetermeer","functionality":"Geldautomaat","geldmaatPlus":false,"id":"921805","latitude":52.043494,"location":"2719001","longitude":4.476275,"openingHours":{"tu":["07:00-22:00"],"mo":["07:00-22:00"],"su":["08:00-22:00"],"th":["07:00-22:00"],"fr":["07:00-22:00"],"we":["07:00-22:00"],"sa":["07:00-22:00"]},"storeType":"albertheijn","streetAddress":"Samanthagang 64","withdrawableDenominations":["none"],"zip":"2719CK"}],"functionality":["Geldautomaat"],"latitude":52.043494,"longitude":4.476275,"streetAddress":"Samanthagang 64","storeType":"albertheijn","zip":"2719CK"}}

Het locatie nummer is trouwens de postcode met een volgnummer
literan (2025-08-17 11:04:06+00:00): service=alley лишний тег

это для дорог на задах домов, часто сельских, где дети играют и барбекю устраивают. В России нечасто встречается.
martinst (2025-08-22 01:46:25+00:00): Wieso access=no?
Das ist bis auf Wegen in Sperrgebieten eigentlich immer falsch.
Timo Herker (2025-08-22 08:52:09+00:00): Danke, hab ich nicht richtig gelesen! 
Ist geändert.
martinst (2025-08-23 06:23:15+00:00): access=* gehört komplett entfernt, ebenso horse=no falls nicht explizit so beschildert. 
motor_vehicle ebenso, ergibt sich implizit durch highway=path.

Zum richtigen Tagging siehe:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dpath
Timo Herker (2025-08-23 08:47:16+00:00): Danke, passt das so?
Habe es geändert. 
Die Zugangsberechtigungen lassen sich nicht komplett rauslöschen. 
Wenn ja, kannst du das gerne machen, ich mache das noch nicht allzu lange.

Grüße
martinst (2025-08-23 09:09:05+00:00): Schaut gut aus, Danke.
gurglypipe (2025-08-17 22:52:45+00:00): Hiya, this post box is a duplicate of one which is already mapped. I’ve deleted it (in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170589310), but can you please be more careful not to add duplicate stuff to the map? Thanks, and happy editing :)
map per (2025-09-19 19:57:10+00:00): Hi Timo Herker,

ich hab den 'tourism=wilderness_hut' Tag bei der Schaf-Alm wieder gelöscht, weil die Hütte nicht öffentlich zugänglich ist (vlg. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:tourism%3Dwilderness_hut)

Viele Grüße
map per
Dillen GJ (2025-08-17 08:31:40+00:00): Thanks ! ;)
roelant (2025-08-17 09:20:25+00:00): No problem. 😊
eggie (2025-08-17 09:05:13+00:00): Welkom bij OSM.   
office=it ?
De info heb ik samengevoegd met de al bestaande adresnode.
Evt kan ook phone=+31....  worden toegevoegd. 

MVG
eggie