piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Stefan Paluch (2024-07-10 17:45:51+00:00): Thank you for your comments! The main purpose was to mark the obstacle at this location as soon as possible. This obstacle prevents passage, so route planning applications would avoid directing users down this road. It's a small change, but crucial for anyone planning to drive there. While the description is brief, it effectively captures the essence of the modification. I'll definitely try to be more descriptive in the future when appropriate.
eggie (2024-09-01 07:15:43+00:00): Dag Shantos.. Wat is dit voor een fietspad (Rodetorenbrug) ?
Het is als pedestrian getagd met bicycle = yes door een zeer ervaren mapper. 
Dat is voetgangersgebied waar je ook mag fietsen.
De ingangen van de parking is een overkapping. .. dus building-roof layer=1 De gebouwdelen heb je helaas verwijderd. 
Graag reactie.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-09-01 07:18:57+00:00): reverted by changeset #156041506

Ik heb je wijzigingen teruggedraaid hier.
Ga er van uit dat al heel veel goed is gemapt. Wanneer je ergens mag fietsen maakt dat nog geen fietspad.
MVG
eggie
Frans S (2024-07-09 10:51:48+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
A: Inaccurate mapping

B:Overlapping buildings

C: Collecting adjacent buildings and mapped is as 1 building

D:Connecting Nodes to other features

E:Buildings not squared



Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153671535
b-holdet (2024-07-12 20:55:25+00:00): Hvorfor skal dette vejstykke have navn?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1299835952

Og hvor har du navnet fra, for der er ikke rigtig noget, der passer med, at det skal hedde Smedeland.
Det kunne også hedde Malervangen, eller noget helt andet.

Skal vejstykket have et navn set med dine øjne?
b-holdet (2024-07-14 17:28:16+00:00): Hej Henrik,

Kan du ikke forholde dig til mine spørgsmål i stedet for bare at rette i kortet.

Hvorfor mener du at dette vejstykke skal have et navn? Og hvor har du så fundet det?
Henrik PS (2024-07-14 18:23:15+00:00): Jeg mener, at stierne skal have vejnavnet Malervangen, da der er adresser med indgange til de pågældende stier, også selvom de ikke fremgår af Danmarksadresser. Det skulle naturligvis ikke være Smedeland. 
Jeg beklager, at jeg var for hurtig på aftrækkeren.
emersonveenstra (2024-07-10 19:46:08+00:00): Hi there,

I'm not sure that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/17977774 (and the rest of M149 to US 2) meets the qualifications for a primary road, given that it doesn't really connect anything. Could you explain a bit more why you changed it to primary?
elsy1 (2024-07-07 17:37:12+00:00): درود، لطفا برای جاده های خاکی کشاورزی از تگ track استفاده کنید تشکر.
ivanbranco (2024-07-22 12:42:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28303921

May I encourage you to engage with the broader community so to avoid edit warring? See also: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=2690560
Đuro Jiří (2024-12-10 21:52:27+00:00): Mogu znati izvor imen.

Puedo saber la fuente del nombre?
jbtc (2024-12-11 06:35:47+00:00): Es la del lugar en la que está emplazada.
To je mjesto u kojem se nalazi.
Đuro Jiří (2024-12-11 09:36:33+00:00): Exactamente, pero no se llama el segundo lugar donde se ubica.
jbtc (2024-12-11 20:18:44+00:00): Pues muy bien.
martianfreeloader (2024-08-24 12:11:12+00:00): Hi,

Another mapper noticed that you have created a number of empty nodes with this changeset. Looks like an accident.

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/117853

Happy mapping!
Joško Horvat (2024-08-27 16:06:15+00:00): Uhm, this is known problem, should be addresed to "ChrisM4" who made revert on my import of that area. We will fix this problem, but i am about to discus the issue in my group first. Tnx
martianfreeloader (2024-08-27 20:49:32+00:00): Thanks, I hadn't noticed this. Is this already being discussed with ChrisM4?
Joško Horvat (2024-08-29 03:49:07+00:00): Yes. Presumably one building was deletet, which was not in our data base "GURS" either visible on DOF layer. He simpy refused to cooperate to locate that building. Furthermore, in that neighberhood (5km), he didn't made one single improvment. What abaot you. I noticed, you made significent effort on improving OSM data in SLO.  You are not native Slovene?
martianfreeloader (2024-08-29 17:50:04+00:00): Ok, sorry to hear that. Is that conversation public?

No, I'm not from Slovenia. It's just the place where i started mapping and since I find the mapping community there quite pleasant, I just kept on. :-)
Joško Horvat (2024-08-29 21:05:25+00:00): Well, some of us, commited to improve Slovenia you can meet at: https://t.me/osm_si  You are welcome to apply the channel. Most of us are familiar with english spoken people. Short introduction to the admin David Karlas will do
ChrisM4 (2024-08-30 06:23:36+00:00): FYI, I only restored the previous state after Josko Horvat deleted everything. I did not make any other changes. I have detailed this in the discussion regarding the ongoing mass deletions.

Some of the people I was in contact with agree that Josko Horvat’s changes are excessively destructive and generally harmful. Objects, inscriptions, and other elements are simply disappearing.
ChrisM4 (2024-08-30 06:27:57+00:00): Primarily, what you see here is the result of changes made by Josko Hrovat. As I mentioned, many facilities have disappeared, including his house. When I repaired and restored the area after him, I couldn’t inspect all the damage he caused. I focused only on the immediate surroundings, which I usually inspect.
Friendly_Ghost (2024-07-12 17:04:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153864687
Lumikeiju (2024-07-07 19:24:39+00:00): Thanks for cleaning these up! I also appreciate that you left detailed and helpful comments on the reverted changesets. :)

For anyone wanting to review this changeset, I'd recommend using the following tool, because OSMCha struggles with large bboxes:
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=153673904
CurlingMan13 (2024-07-07 19:38:36+00:00): As soon as I submitted, I was like "crap - I should have split out that one in Germany.  Oh well, they will let me know."  Maybe a bbox splitter can be incorporated into the revert tool.
rarad74 (2024-07-07 18:40:18+00:00): Poti sa ne explic si noua CINE ESTI TU Si DECE blochezi accesul pe Pasajele Piata Sudului si Mihai Bravu? Iti arde de gluma?
Aruba297 (2024-07-16 18:08:15+00:00): Moved to City Center
Black_Diamond (2024-07-08 06:51:16+00:00): Thank you!
Fizzie-DWG (2024-07-07 22:54:19+00:00): Hello olivejoh. Why are you adding buildings, deleting them, then adding them again? & please don't just accept the AI generated building outline that appears - please actually straighten it so that it follows the actual visible outline.
Fizzie-DWG (2024-07-16 02:55:41+00:00): Reverted by DWG as extremely poor quality

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153995176
DENelson83 (2024-07-27 00:58:19+00:00): You broke way #651372392.
Enderbyte99 (2024-07-27 01:03:50+00:00): Oh dear. I apologize. I will go fix it immediately if it hasn’t been fixed already. 

Better that than the whole Vancouver island relation though…
jake-low (2024-07-09 03:05:08+00:00): Hi JLM62, welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I see you've marked some private roads and property boundaries in this changeset. I wanted to let you know that while OpenStreetMap welcomes this type of information, there are specific ways to map this that should be followed. Specifically, private roads etc should be tagged "access=private", and the "name" field should include only the real name of the road and not extra information or messages. In order to correct these problems I've had to revert your changes.

Please feel free to message me if you'd like help inputting this data correctly and I'll be happy to offer some guidance. You may also wish to look at the OpenStreetMap Wiki which documents how to add this sort of information to the map.
ferog_v (2024-09-22 21:26:56+00:00): Buen día Ferrocarriles de México, la relación aquí creada es incorrecta según la Wiki OSM
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Mexico/Red_Nacional_de_Caminos#Relaciones_para_caminos
El nombre de la relación será el dado a la carretera por la SCT en Datos Viales
Esta relación debería estar partida en varias con el nombre para cada tramo según la SCT.
Asimismo has etiquetado la red carretera como MX:MX lo cual es incorrecto de acuerdo a la misma Wiki de OSM https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Mexico/Red_Nacional_de_Caminos#Relaciones_para_caminos indica que los caminos federales deben ser etiquetados como MX:MEX.
Por favor revise sus ediciones.
Shaun das Schaf (2025-01-01 15:13:12+00:00): Hi, there already is a power line with two circuits here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/71933241

You added another one next to it, in the forest: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1299853642

Does it really exist?
the_edge01 (2025-01-01 15:20:09+00:00): If you look a the Bing or Esri World Imagery, you can see a this transmission line has been added.  The imagery cuts off on both ends, so this should be updated once the imagery exists.
Shaun das Schaf (2025-01-01 15:22:56+00:00): Nevermind, I can see it on Bing :-)
Leo Slager (2024-07-07 22:50:59+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Leo Slager (2024-07-07 22:54:38+00:00): Hallo Jaco,

Feedback:
Gebouwen en adressen worden in NL geïmporteerd van uit de BAG van het Kadaster.
De import kun je aanvragen in het forum.
Het is dus beter om niet zelf te gaan intekenen of om de outline van een gebouw te gaan wijzigen.
pitscheplatsch (2024-07-08 06:17:29+00:00): Hi swedish_meatball-man, welcome to OSM.

I guess something went wrong w/ the name here: https://osm.org/way/1299856394

Correct?
pitscheplatsch (2024-07-12 18:22:27+00:00): Partly reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153695197
tordans (2024-07-09 15:44:40+00:00): @SteMu was hat dich zu dem Umtaggen zur Grundstückszufahrt bewegt von https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1007431584 ff. ? Meiner Meinung nach ist 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:service=driveway gedacht für den (kleinen) Weg zu ein einzelnen Häusern. Aber hier gehen ja öffentliche Wege ab und es ist die Anschluss-Straße für mehrere Häuser. Unter https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Attribuierung_von_Stra%C3%9Fen_in_Deutschland#Erschlie%C3%9Fungswege_zu_einzelnen_H%C3%A4usern wird auch das "private Grundstückszufahrten" betont.

VG
SteMue (2024-07-09 17:34:10+00:00): Welche öffentliche Wege gehen hinter eine Straße mit beidseitigem Schlüsselzugang und ohne Abzweige außer ein paar Trampelpfaden ab?
Ich verstehe nicht was Du meinst.
VG
MaGIStokrat (2024-09-30 14:54:22+00:00): Hi  mbit,

vor ein paar Monaten hatte ich schonmal bei aktualisierten Haltestellennamen in CB eine Inkonsistenz festgestellt und korrigiert:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148726723

In diesem CS hier wurden die Namen, wie ich nun sehe, auch nicht in allen zugehörigen Objekten zur HSt. geändert.

Problem:
Die übergeordnete Relation hat noch den alten Namen, ebenso "platform".

Also Relation + platform + stop_position sollten gleich benannt sein.
Zudem, so denke ich, ist es sinnvoll, den oder die alten Namen als Zusatztag mit Lifecycle zu sichern, bspw. als "old_name:-2022-12-10 = xyz" (wenn der alte Name bis 10.12.22 galt, ohne Kenntnis des Inbetriebnahmedatums)

Stichtag dieser Umbenennungen  hier war m.W. der 8.7.24 (demnach old_name:-2024-07-07)

Beispiele s.
- platform
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/203372333
- stop_position
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1426495745
- Relation (der kompl. Haltestelle):
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1745126

Kennst du dich mit dem Ändern von Relationen mit josm aus? Ansonsten kann ich das übernehmen.
VG Matthias
mbit (2024-10-01 13:18:51+00:00): Hallo Namensvetter,

vielen Dank für den Hinweis. Da habe ich beim Ändern der Haltestellennamen übersehen, dass da noch mehr Informationen dran hängen. Ich werde das korrigieren.

Gruß
Matthias
Leo Slager (2024-07-07 22:47:10+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Leo Slager (2024-07-07 22:50:19+00:00): Dag BramKelly,

Feedback:
Geldt dat éénrichtings verkeer ook voor fietsers en/of bromfietsers ?
Zo nee, dan kun je nog toevoegen:
oneway:bicycle=no
oneway:mofa=no
oneway:moped=no
Leo Slager (2024-07-08 09:22:16+00:00): ik heb het aangepast
SAMARP (2024-07-07 20:00:42+00:00): House number added
joost schouppe (2024-07-12 15:17:24+00:00): Hoi,
Kan je dit soort changesets eerst bespreken op het Belgische forum of op Element? Hier rechtstreekse link naar kleine dicussie hierover: https://matrix.to/#/!SqvNXrBsvdGHYRyota:matrix.org/$17207730244935gorJG:matrix.org?via=matrix.org&via=matrix.domainepublic.net&via=nitro.chat
phantasma097 (2024-07-07 20:12:49+00:00): (To continue) Wexford County Council ARGGIS suggests unanimously that Red Row is in fact the R-742, and that the way R-742 is currently mapped is L-1000 [https://maps.wexford.ie/imaps/]; documentation on the road itself in development plans confirm this (https://www.wexfordcoco.ie/sites/default/files/content/Planning/CourtownRiverchapelLAP15-21/CourtownAndRiverchapelLocalAreaPlan15-21.pdf; page 2 the R742 clearly follows Red Row and not into town; page 24 "Many of the estates are accessed directly from the R742 regional road. (...) Red Row and all along and fronting onto the R742 is characterised by a pattern ..." indicates directly that Red Row is in fact R742.

I would be interested if somebody could determine if this was always the case: was it reclassified? Or has it just always been classified incorrectly -- I'm fascinated!
gurglypipe (2024-07-08 08:12:21+00:00): I think this is a service road, not a track. It’s regularly used for vehicular access to the YHA and the hut, by cars rather than agricultural vehicles.
gurglypipe (2024-07-09 09:21:18+00:00): Reverted as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153735719
user_3022894 (2024-07-07 20:14:56+00:00): Quelle: Artikel in der Westdeutschen Zeitung
grzegorzmilosz (2024-07-08 15:49:22+00:00): https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-JTIi0GYFqA2OQygQXxcyzg75jW2lAVe/view?usp=drive_link tutaj jest zdjęcie znaku z numerem drogi w Godzikowicach i na potwierdzenie mapa aktualna mapa dróg powiatowych: http://pzd-olawa.pl/zalaczniki/MapaDrogPowiatowych2020.pdf
Lumikeiju (2024-07-07 20:25:29+00:00): This changeset edited no geometry and made the following tag-only modifications:

Modified:
"amenity=vending_machine" -> "amenity=ticket_validator"
"operator=TfWM" -> "operator:short=TfWM"
"shelter=7201" -> "ref=7201" (1 instance not caught by Changeset: 153675345)

Added:
"operator=Transport for West Midlands"
"operator:wikidata=Q7985947"
"payment:swift_card=yes"
I also added documentation for this Swift card subkey on the OSM Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:payment:*#Public_transport

Removed:
"category=Interchange|Station|Stop"
"mode=Bus|Metro"
"name=*"
"naptan=*"
"payment=no"
"postal_code=*"
"public_transport_ticket=Swift Card"
"source=TfWM"
"top_up=yes"
"vending=public_transport_tickets"

Unaffedted:
"check_date=*"
silversurfer83 (2024-07-08 06:59:50+00:00): Moin :)

Bist du dir mit den access Werten hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1038331434 sicher? Außer Fahrrädern darf da jetzt nichts (auch Fußgänger nicht) entlang.
Gibt's da Schilder?

Grüße aus Korbach
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153677758
TourenbikerFKB (2024-07-08 14:47:21+00:00): oh je, vehicle=no (Verkehrszeichen 250) ist richtig. Wird gleich korrigiert. Danke fürs Auspassen.
TourenbikerFKB (2024-07-08 15:08:10+00:00): apropos Aufpassen: magst du dich um die Verlegung der Routen kümmern (R8, Ederradweg, Oranierroute). Ich müßte mich neu fit machen dafür, habe aber die nächsten Tage keine Zeit dafür.
silversurfer83 (2024-07-08 19:16:01+00:00): hui.
Relationen sind (noch) gar nicht so meins. Mal sehn, was die Tage so ansteht, vielleicht probier ich es mal. Würde mich dann melden
NorthCrab_upload (2024-07-07 20:30:26+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11573472092
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1299867915

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Carpathians (2024-07-08 14:34:54+00:00): Dzięki za info:)
Usunąłem adres z tagów budynku.
jeslop (2024-07-08 08:16:23+00:00): Hi TeroToc. Can you please follow guidelines about changeset comments?(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments). Everyone's time is valuable and good feedback helps to improve the quality of the map.

Regards,

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
TeroToc (2024-07-08 13:10:40+00:00): No, sorry.
mcliquid (2024-07-07 20:41:32+00:00): Hi and thank you for your contribution!

Please note for the future: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
NorthCrab_upload (2024-07-07 20:40:33+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12040587597

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Carpathians (2024-07-08 14:39:20+00:00): Dzięki za info:)
Wprowadziłem adres z danych pensjonatu, widocznych na ich stronie.
Ulica Krzywaniec jest niedaleko.
Pozdrawiam:)
NorthCrab (2024-07-08 14:41:28+00:00): Rzeczywiście jest Krzywaniec/Graniczna. Dzięki za edycję :-)!
Pikse (2024-10-06 17:37:43+00:00): This is not the right fix. Larger one of these two ways is an outer way for a forest, and smaller one is an outer way for a pond. Pond and forest warrant separate relations.
Krystek (2024-07-08 13:25:46+00:00): Istnieje. Wczoraj wieczorem (po 23-ciej) przechodziłem obok niej. To jest plastikowa kabina typu toi-toi.
przem (2024-07-08 14:19:11+00:00): ok, mój błąd!
Krystek (2024-07-08 14:25:01+00:00): Wycofałem ten zestaw zmian, więc nic już nie musisz z tym robić. Toaleta pojawi(ła) się ponownie na OSMapie.
Lachgast (2024-07-07 22:08:02+00:00): Te gek, je komt als geroepen! Ik zag inderdaad nogal wat oude contouren.
Chapeau!
Sander H (2024-07-08 16:03:39+00:00): Graag gedaan. Ben bezig Noord-Holland langzaamaan van noord naar zuid een beetje bij te werken. Achterstanden genoeg...
Lumikeiju (2024-07-08 20:50:24+00:00): Hello, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

I saw that you requested a review of this changeset, and I noticed a couple of minor tagging errors:

"access=no" should be changed to "access=private" and the "private=*" tags should be removed. (The "*" is used in discussions and documentation as a placeholder to represent another value, and isn't meant to be entered literally)

Unless restrictions on bicycle use are explicitly signed at the location (and I don't see any on the Mapillary footage of this location from 2020, when the gate was open) I would also remove the "foot=*" and "bicycle=*" tags.

If the gate is normally locked, you could also add "locked=yes" to the "barrier=gate" node to make is clear that this is not open or accessible to the public.

Let me know if you have any questions, and happy mapping!
Lumikeiju (2024-07-18 21:49:48+00:00): I've updated this location in Changeset: 154119961.
jeslop (2024-07-08 07:52:35+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153690555
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-07-08 22:26:29+00:00): this changeset disconnected some ways.
reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153723040
jeslop (2024-07-08 07:52:36+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153690555
AurélienQ (2024-07-09 13:54:51+00:00): Hi,
These roads are links to motoroad, so why did you change them ? All around the world it's done like this, so why ?

I'm sorry for your changes but I have to revert these ones.
Soshal Distan Singh (2024-07-20 03:45:14+00:00): Вам необходимо это изучить:

[ 1 ] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Changeset
 ▶️ Теги для пакета правок: "comment=* – описывает, почему составитель карт сделал определенные правки или что именно он отредактировал. Составители карт поощряются полнее использовать этот тег, добавляя ясное, составленное человеком (вместо автоматического) описание, которое затем будет отображено почти везде, где будет встречаться ваш Пакет правок, а будущим составителям карт поможет быстрее понять, какие изменения были сделаны."
 ▶️ Рекомендации по делению правок по пакетам.

[ 2 ] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Editing_Standards
 ▶️ Do not trace from outdated imagery
 ▶️ Align aerial imagery before tracing → https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Использование_аэрофотоснимков
Часто обрисовываете устаревшие снимки, не разобравшись, какая из спутниковых подложек свежее.

[ 3 ] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Roof_modelling#Функция_«сделать_прямоугольную»
Рисование простых контуров здания → Функция «сделать прямоугольную» → "для создания идеально ровного прямоугольника нажмите Q"
Soshal Distan Singh (2024-07-20 03:47:32+00:00): [ 4.1 ] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Highway_classification
 * https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:highway%3Dunclassified - регулярно не по делу используете

[ 4.2 ] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Additional_rules_to_highway_classification
Распространённые ошибки → Отсутствие общих точек на одноуровневых пересечениях дорог.

[ 4.3 ] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Договорённости_и_Стандарты_редактирования#Точность_и_правильность

[ 5 ] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Россия/Соглашение_об_именовании_дорог (это важный пункт)
Soshal Distan Singh (2024-07-20 03:48:45+00:00): [ 6 ] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:wikipedia
 ▶️ "для больших объектов состоящих из множества линий (например железная дорога или река) ссылку нужно указывать на отношение объединяющее эти линии, а не на каждую отдельно"
 ▶️ Дополнительные ссылки на Википедию → subject:wikipedia=*
"На памятниках, мемориалах, статуях и подобных объектах должен быть указан тег wikipedia=*, только если это статья в Википедии о конкретном памятнике."

[ 7 ] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:contact:*
VK.com → contact:vk=*

[ 8 ] Про это уже писал, но приходится повторять: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Названия#Имя_–_это_название_и_только