piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
gpserror (2023-05-11 05:13:13+00:00): In my opinion, probably did not have to change this for the construction that's happening on I-25.  Yes it's more accurate but it will be changed back when construction is complete pretty close to what it was before.  Granted this construction is indeed taking several years so it's a candidate, but I hope that when it's all done it gets changed back speedily...
smikhnouski_lyft (2023-05-11 13:38:13+00:00): Hi!
My name is Stepan and I am a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft.
According to OSM wiki tag construction is used to denote active construction sites that typically take several years to complete. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:construction 

These edits are designed to make traffic safer. As you mentioned, the construction on the motorway will last for an extended period of time. If we leave it without modifying the geometry and the construction tag, it would interfere with localization and confuse the users.
I think it would be better for the map users to see the current road situation.
As motorways are high-traffic roads any changes are noticed quickly and I think as soon as the construction work on the road is over, the geometry of the road will be corrected in a short period. 

Thank you for your contribution,
Stepan
mtmail (2023-04-24 23:34:23+00:00): Is the 'c' in the zip code field a copy&paste error?
osmhonehone (2023-04-25 00:03:41+00:00): Thanks for catching this.  Fixed now.
silversurfer83 (2023-04-25 06:50:00+00:00): Hallo Tikaspi :)
Danke, dass du hilfst die Informationen bei OSM zu verbessern. Ich hätte ein Anmerkung zu den Zugangsberechtigungen, die du gesetzt hast:
access und die detaillierten tags wie bicycle, etc. an Wegen setzen wir nur nach rechtlichen Gegebenheiten. Wenn also ein Schild vorschreibt oder verbietet dort mit dem Fahrrad oder dem Pferd entlang zu gehen/fahren, dann können wir das so an dem Weg vermerken. Um die Passierbarkeit zu erfassen gibt es die diversen *_scale= Angaben, die du ja schon gefunden hast.
Weißt du, ob die Brücke in irgendeiner Form beschildert ist? Ist dies überhaupt eine Feldwegbrücke, wie dein Vorgänger an dieser Stelle eingetragen hat? Gibt es vielliecht ein Schild mit einem Maximalgewicht?

Mit Bitte um Reaktion 
silversurfer83

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135193573
MxxCon (2023-04-25 03:27:41+00:00): Hello.
What did you do in these some other edits spanning the northern US?
Ktr101 (2023-08-17 00:44:40+00:00): Apologies for the late reply on this, but I was editing various locations and had zero idea at the time that this can ping every editor in that span. For this, I was doing some rail alignment edits, and worked on Cheyenne Mountain. Either way, I will certainly make smaller edits in the future, and thanks for the note.
MxxCon (2023-08-17 04:20:40+00:00): yes, it's best to keep edits grouped to smaller geographic locations, such as by neighborhood, city, county or state at most.
Wipflord (2023-05-11 00:51:20+00:00): name=* ist kein Beschreibungsfeld!
Wipflord (2023-05-11 00:56:59+00:00): name=* ist kein Beschreibungsfeld!
rskedgell (2023-04-21 14:42:09+00:00): Rather than using opening_hours=closed, there's the option of using a lifestyle prefix for features which are no longer open, or have been removed entirely. StreetComplete will prompt passing users to re-check some of these at intervals.

In this case, you could consider changing shop=toys to disused:shop=toys and possibly add check_date=2023-04-21

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:check_date
Pootlist (2023-04-22 11:08:06+00:00): Perfect, thank you! I’ve updated it with those tags.
Wipflord (2023-05-11 01:07:49+00:00): name=* ist kein Beschreibungsfeld!
Frans S (2023-04-26 13:03:57+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
Building not mapped accurate.
Buildings not squared.
Nodes connected to other features



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135194450
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-04-27 18:27:46+00:00): bicycles are allowed on highway=service without designation. I don't think there is a sign there which specifically mentions bicycles. I recommend removing this tag to avoid confusion.

I see a living street sign though from eastern direction, so it could be turned into highway=living_street there
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=59.400560199998&lng=24.7111554&z=17&focus=photo&dateFrom=2022-08-01&pKey=2314528772028620&x=0.1301580709665921&y=0.4396471588737944&zoom=2.297380026206857
Kayo_33 (2023-08-31 12:41:17+00:00): Thanks for pointing it out! Removed designated tag: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140633762
vojtechzaboril (2023-04-24 17:14:04+00:00): hasební obvod určitě není landuse=residential
eggie (2023-04-21 14:43:37+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback   Wat is je bedoeling? Je hebt nu iets ingevuld bij source   Dat is in dit geval de BAG (kadaster)
Je bijdrage zal in OSM niets doen.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-04-21 14:50:32+00:00): Wanneer er hier een bezoekadres is dan kan een Stichting in OSM.. Zoniet dan kan een vermelding beter achterwege blijven. 
Laat het even weten.. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-04-27 19:40:02+00:00): Geen reactie... source verwijderd hier.

Groet
eggie
felipeeugenio (2023-10-20 11:42:06+00:00): Hola. Ojo con unir segmentos de calles. A veces están separados porque cierto segmento forma parte de una relación. En esta edición se rompieron hartas restricciones de giro.

saludos
adrianojbr (2023-04-21 16:09:35+00:00): Olá, nyght123!

Algumas observações:
1. Há uma padronização para o mapeamento de escolas no Brasil: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Tag:amenity%3Dschool#Mapeamento_brasileiro;

2. O CEP deve ser no formato XXXXX-XXX;

3. Não se deve mapear os objetos em duplicidade, como ponto e área, conforme https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#One_feature,_one_OSM_element.

Abraço!
clay_c (2023-05-28 21:04:40+00:00): Hi antiviro,

I've reverted this [1] and many other changesets you've subsequently made to the Addicks Reservoir. You have broken the multipolygon relation by leaving several inner polygons outside the outer polygon.

The previously mapped boundary represented the extent of the floodplains of the Barker Reservoir as the City of Houston had it drawn. If you have more a more accurate data source than that, please specify it in your changeset. Aerial imagery alone has no elevation data and you can't deduce floodplain zones from it.

Let me know if you have any questions.

-Clay

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136671914
antiviro (2023-05-31 20:20:35+00:00): You are discriminating land use based on political distinction. If we want to talk about reservoir, technically a bunch o f those housing developments, schools, the West Houston Airport, etc, etc, etc, should all be included. This is why so much of the area was damaged/destroyed by Hurricane Harvey because there aren't significant differences in elevation across Houston basically anywhere.

This issue was addressed years ago. The practice in this area is to carve things out of the 'basin' once the area is developed. You're adjusting maps based on political boundaries, not on reality.

Most of Houston consists of floodplain zones. This was already discussed years ago. The recent change is due to a different editor, who doesn't live in this region, and who doesn't predominately edit this region, just mapping based on political boundaries, just as you are doing now.
antiviro (2023-05-31 20:21:44+00:00): I've sought to edit based on consistency without discriminating by political boundaries or land use. This is the general practice, and has been for years.
clay_c (2023-05-31 20:57:48+00:00): Could you please provide a link to where this issue was addressed? I am not aware of any discussions about this topic. For developed areas to be carved out of the reservoir, they'd have to be physically raised in elevation, and I can't find any information online about such a project.

To reiterate, your changesets broke five multipolygon and boundary relations. There were several "inner" polygons left outside of "outer" polygons for the reservoirs, and the boundaries for Harris and Fort Bend Counties had a chunk left missing. Even if your mapping practice were otherwise correct, these large-scale geometry errors needed to be reverted.

I was one of the first few editors of these reservoirs over 10 years ago. I grew up in Katy, and while I have since moved away and my most recent edits have largely been outside of Katy, I have not stopped caring about my hometown. The boundaries of the reservoirs and the elevations within are largely the same as they were back then. If you have any updated information, let me know.
antiviro (2023-05-31 21:03:34+00:00): Then this whole section of Houston needs to be marked as 'basin' because this area is not recessed in contrast to the surrounding area.

This is an administrative distinction, not mapping whats on the ground. If you grew up in these areas, then you should know this whole area is not recessed nor covered in water.
antiviro (2023-05-31 21:06:54+00:00): Check elevation maps for the area, there is not a 'basin' by elevation, rather its a reservoir due to the earthen wall. If you recall Harvey, part of the reason they released the water into west houston was because they were worried the earthen wall could breach.
clay_c (2023-05-31 21:20:14+00:00): I'm not quite sure what point you're trying to make here, but the Addicks and Barker Reservoirs are detention basins that are indeed dry most of the time, but fill up with stormwater after heavy downpours. The accepted tagging scheme for detention basins is natural=water + water=basin + basin=detention [1]. If this doesn't look right to you, consider posting a message on the community forums [2].

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:basin%3Ddetention

[2] https://community.openstreetmap.org/
antiviro (2023-05-31 21:27:19+00:00): You stated that to be carved out of the basin, the area would need to be raised. You are now changing from discussing elevation, to being an area used for detention of water. 

Other areas of developed land in the area are not raised, and yet are carved out of the basin. This is why they still flood when major flooding events happen, like Harvey, because they are still part of the basin; yet they have been carved out on the political/administrative boundaries that you want to adhere to. Examples include Canyon Gate at Cinco Ranch, Barkers Branch and Barkers Crossing, and pretty much all the housing at Highway 6 and Clay.

So, you propose we don't map whats on the ground, and instead adhere only to administrative/political boundaries.
antiviro (2023-06-10 23:30:50+00:00): You have not responded to this thead.
clay_c (2023-06-11 01:35:33+00:00): This issue requires more discussion than some changeset comments. Start a thread on https://community.openstreetmap.org.
antiviro (2023-06-11 04:06:10+00:00): Why not a local meetup instead, I can see if some of the other local mappers who worked on this area are available too?
clay_c (2023-06-12 15:33:50+00:00): Thank you for reverting the changesets. I know It's frustrating to have to revert hours worth of your own work, but it's important to keep geometries valid and intact.

Is there anywhere where I can read about the findings from your meetup group (for example, a user diary entry or an online discussion thread)? If not, could you summarize what happened in the local meetup?
wielandb-paid (2024-08-07 23:04:29+00:00): Hey :)

Du hast für diesen Parkplatz eingetragen, dass es 50 markierte Behindertenparkplätze gibt. Das schaut jetzt nicht wirklich danach aus. Kannst du dich erinnern, was du in OpenStop eingegeben hast?
boldtrn (2023-04-21 14:35:13+00:00): Scheinbar seit 22 wieder befahrbar, denke 23 sollte das wieder passen: https://meerbusch.de/service-und-politik/nachrichten/artikel/bruecke-am-weilerhof-in-ossum-boesinghoven-ab-25-mai-gesperrt.html
user_5359 (2023-04-21 16:23:25+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I remove your SEO SPAM (mostly foreign keys)
silversurfer83 (2023-04-21 15:37:24+00:00): Hi :)

du wirst bei Gelegenheit ausführlicher begrüßt. Bin grad aufm Sprung.

Hier was zu deiner Änderung:
Du hast hier einen riesigen Teich erschaffen https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15750427
Kein Problem, aber guck dir das nochmal an.

Und bitte ausfürhlicher Kommentieren
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135196630
sgrossberndt (2023-04-21 14:46:54+00:00): Das Löschen war falsch, dies ist noch ein CarSharing-Standort, jetzt aber von Flinkster ohne wupsi-Bezug:
https://www.flinkster.de/kundenbuchung/process.php?proc=station&station_id=404972&key=

Kann bitte jemand diese Änderung zurücknehmen?
highflyer74 (2023-04-22 05:45:13+00:00): Moin! Ist zurückgesetzt. Schönen Tag dir!
sgrossberndt (2023-04-28 08:08:28+00:00): Dankeschön, ebenso!
clay_c (2023-05-28 21:05:31+00:00): Reverted here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136671914

See discussion here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135196157
NorthCrab_upload (2023-04-21 14:50:39+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/105350554
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/105350557
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/332068581
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/332068582

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o miejscowości.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/148039569

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
clay_c (2023-05-28 21:05:34+00:00): Reverted here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136671914

See discussion here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135196157
clay_c (2023-05-28 21:05:35+00:00): Reverted here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136671914

See discussion here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135196157
Tomas_J (2025-04-02 12:25:20+00:00): Čus , crossing ref zebra v kombinaci s crossing markings no asi nebude správně u bodu 428992839.
Lukáš Jelínek (2025-04-02 17:52:48+00:00): Díky za upozornění, opraveno.
Tomas_J (2025-04-02 22:15:28+00:00): 👍
clay_c (2023-05-28 21:05:38+00:00): Reverted here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136671914

See discussion here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135196157
clay_c (2023-05-28 21:05:40+00:00): Reverted here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136671914

See discussion here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135196157
eggie (2023-04-21 15:04:08+00:00): Hi Razuc.. I merged your info with the present addressnode
greetz
eggie
Razuc (2023-04-22 13:44:55+00:00): Hi Eggie,
Thanks!
clay_c (2023-05-28 21:05:42+00:00): Reverted here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136671914

See discussion here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135196157
user_5359 (2023-04-21 16:22:09+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I remove your SEO SPAM (mostly foreign keys)
matheusgomesms (2023-04-25 21:10:59+00:00): Oi keurianderson, tudo bem?

Primeiramente bem-vindo ao OSM! Espero que se divirta por aqui! Se precisar de qualquer ajuda, não hesite em me enviar uma mensagem!

Vi que você adicionou um parque, mas não consegui ver na imagem (vi várias casas ali). Esse parque é novo?

Att,
Matheus
Tomas Straupis (2023-04-21 18:46:28+00:00): Atšaukiu šitą pakeitimą, nes čia suvestas neaiškus slėnis, įvestas neteisingoje vietoje Arklių 5 adresas ir visas pastatas kampinis nėra Lėlių teatras. Gal galima tiesiog parašyti, kas buvo bandyta padaryti/pažymėti ir aš galėsiu padėti?
Ieva Likauskaitė (2023-04-24 10:41:58+00:00): Sveiki, Tomai, 

būčiau nuoširdžiai dėkinga už pakeitimą! Nes turime problemų su Bolt'u - jie naudoja Jūsų žemėlapius. 
Vilniaus teatras "Lėlė" yra įsikūręs Arklių g. 5, Vilnius, 01305

Jūsų žemėlapiuose rodo, jog Vilniaus teatras "Lėlė" įsikūręs M. K. Čiurlionio g. 18, Vilnius. Tuo adresu buvome TIK IKI 1975 m. :)))

Būčiau dėkinga už pagalbą.
Tomas Straupis (2023-04-24 11:18:14+00:00): Prašom, įdėjau jūsų teatrą šalia Etmonų Špunkos :-)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10836820870
Boltas į Čiurlionį neturėtų vežti, ten OpenStreetMap žemėlapyje yra pažymėtas ne teatras, o memorialinė lenta.
Sėkmės!
Ieva Likauskaitė (2023-04-25 12:15:02+00:00): Dėkoju, Tomai! Bet Bolt'o programėlėje vis tiek rodo teatrą kaip M. K. Čiurlionio gatvės pastatą... :( Gal yra galimybė tą memorialinę lentą kažkaip kitaip pažymėti, pvz. kaip memorialinė lenta Baliui Lukošiui (neminint teatro). Nes ne lietuviai vairuotojai pastoviai ne ten žiūrovus veža :D 
Ačiūūūū!
Tomas Straupis (2023-04-25 12:41:37+00:00): Per kiek laiko Bolt pasiims naujus duomenis ir ar pasitaisys, kad neimtų memorialinės lentos, kaip adresato - šito aš jau negaliu kontroliuoti :-(
Dabar duomenys OpenStreetMap DB yra teisingi, toliau jau reikia su Boltu kalbėtis. Mano galva jie neturėtų prie memorialinės lentos iš principo vežti, net jei neranda teatro taško.
clay_c (2023-05-28 21:35:37+00:00): This changeset and many others have been reverted [1] for the same reasons as in this changeset [2]. These changesets broke the Barker Reservoir, George Bush Park, Harris County and Fort Bend County relations.

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136672808

[2] https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135196157
clay_c (2023-05-28 21:36:03+00:00): Reverted here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136672808

See discussion here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135198660
clay_c (2023-05-28 21:36:04+00:00): Reverted here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136672808

See discussion here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135198660
Константин Гам (2023-04-25 10:56:05+00:00): Милый человек! ЛЭП ПЕРЕНЕСЛИ! Не используйте устаревшие данные!!!!!!!!!!!!!
clay_c (2023-05-28 21:36:07+00:00): Reverted here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136672808

See discussion here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135198660
ManDay (2023-04-23 18:23:55+00:00): Where did you get this path from?
ConnorMaps (2023-04-24 21:58:04+00:00): Hi, ManDay. I added these “highway=path” because there was a significant presence of Strava traces on the Strava heatmap (https://github.com/solitone/stravaheatmap) throughout the woods in this National Park, that shows people walking on (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1164484690). If you would like to learn more on how Strava is used in OSM, please check out this link (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Strava). Happy Mapping!
ManDay (2023-04-25 08:16:01+00:00): Thanks for explaing and I can also confirm that the path is exactly as you mapped it. &2u
ConnorMaps (2023-04-25 16:57:17+00:00): Thank you, have a great day!
milet (2023-04-24 18:38:38+00:00): Hallo,
maxspeed:type erhält keine numerischen Werte. Siehe auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:maxspeed:type?uselang=de
Der ursprüngliche Zustand war also eigentlich richtig ;-)
Martin-ER (2023-04-25 14:53:07+00:00): War nur ein Angleichen an den vorderen Teil der Komotauer Str. kann man auch andersherum machen :-)
pitfire (2023-04-22 11:18:52+00:00): Hallo os-emmer,
du hast bestimmt gute Gründe, auf einem frei begehbaren Werksareal zusätzliche "highway=path" anzulegen. Ich kenne das Werksgelände zwar nicht, aber selbst auf aktuellen Luftbildern sind keine Unterscheidungsmerkmal auf der Oberfläche erkennbar, die zusätzliche Wege zwischen den Hallen erforderlich machen! 
Zudem werden mehre Fehlermeldungen erkannt: Straße kreuzt Straße & Straße kreuzt kleine Wasserfläche & fehlende Knotenverbindungen mit den bestehenden "highway". Benötigen die Mitarbeiter so ausführliche Wegführungen innerhalb des Betriebes?
Die Überdachung "Weg: 874828240" ist roof, aber nicht gleichzeitig shelter! "Unterstand ist ein überdachter, offener Platz als Schutz vor der Witterung.
Kannst du dir ja nochmal anschauen :-)
Danke und Gruß
CurlingMan13 (2023-04-21 20:35:10+00:00): Please use more descriptive changeset comments.  What do you mean by "yes"?  Please put what you did, why, etc.  Thanks!

You can learn more about good changeset comments here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135199737
clay_c (2023-05-28 21:36:08+00:00): Reverted here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136672808

See discussion here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135198660
eggie (2023-04-21 16:37:40+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback    Wanneer hier straatstenen liggen was het goed getagd.(straatstenen zijn ook paved)  paved is juist minder specifiek.
Wat is de bestrating hier? 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-04-21 16:53:19+00:00): paving_stones heb ik teruggezet. 
Het was goed getagd. 
Wat was het probleem hier?

MVG
eggie
clay_c (2023-05-28 21:36:11+00:00): Reverted here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136672808

See discussion here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135198660
clay_c (2023-05-28 21:36:12+00:00): Reverted here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136672808

See discussion here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135198660
JochenB (2023-06-18 21:09:22+00:00): Hallo Andre,

Du hast hier eine Ferienwohnung eingetragen. Das finde ich merkwürdig. Weder booking.com, noch Airbnb.de oder fewo-direkt.de haben hier eine Ferienwohnung vermerkt.

Bist du sicher, dass du eine Ferienwohnung mappen wolltest? Wenn nein, was war es? Bitte melde dich, damit wir die richtigen Tags finden.

Chalet im Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:tourism%3Dchalet

Viele Grüße,
Jochen
JochenB (2023-06-18 21:19:32+00:00): Bitte ersetze in meinem Kommentar "Ferienwohnung" durch "Ferienhaus". Ich habe im Netz keine Quelle gefunden, dass es hier ein Ferienhaus gibt. Das ist merkwürdig und das ist ja nicht das einzige Ferienhaus, dass du gemappt hast und dads im Netz nicht auffindbar ist.
clay_c (2023-05-28 21:36:14+00:00): Reverted here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136672808

See discussion here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135198660
clay_c (2023-05-28 21:36:16+00:00): Reverted here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136672808

See discussion here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135198660
eggie (2023-04-21 16:44:38+00:00): In Nederland heeft elk gebouw een adres van het Kadaster..
Alle adressen zijn import.   Dit dus ook. Niet zomaar iets verwijderen svp. 
Ik zal het adres herstellen.
MVG
eggie
clay_c (2023-05-28 21:36:18+00:00): Reverted here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136672808

See discussion here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135198660
eggie (2023-04-21 16:50:35+00:00): Wellicht even hier kijken in de wiki?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural=shrubbery

MVG
eggie
docjay (2023-04-21 16:11:49+00:00): Change set comment got mixed up, should have been: Add Chania shops
NorthCrab_upload (2023-04-21 16:20:23+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1164492711

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Endres Pelka (2023-04-21 16:42:50+00:00): Poprawione w 135202109
Wipflord (2023-05-11 01:09:55+00:00): Bitte keine Verschiebungen, nur um den Namen auf der Karte sichtbar zu machen!