piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
iandees (2026-04-01 15:39:24+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12169187780 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180728998, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
NeisBot (2026-04-01 15:09:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13696090660 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Plumbing business"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-09 16:33:25+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181106914
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
yelisey90 (2026-04-01 17:57:50+00:00): once again reverted. Do not delete the way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/190595192 , it's part of several relations.

Is this what you've been trying to do?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180734493
NeisRevert (2026-04-02 06:41:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/180751772
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
NeisBot (2026-04-01 15:12:46+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13695907435 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "restaurant at H&G"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-09 16:33:28+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181106918
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
tomhukins (2026-04-09 14:05:08+00:00): Again, thank you. :)

I've not walked along the footpath you added, but I think I've seen a "Public footpath" sign here when driving past.

Would "designation=public_footpath" and "foot=designated" make sense on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1495135001?
yelisey90 (2026-04-01 17:40:25+00:00): partly reverted - the parking space is there, it's confirmed
NeisRevert (2026-04-02 06:40:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/180751756
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
willkmis (2026-04-01 20:32:53+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180739891
NeisRevert (2026-04-02 06:40:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/180751725
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
NeisBot (2026-04-01 15:27:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/37552654 v10

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "bar and grill"

#MapWithoutSpam
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-04 11:01:12+00:00): Cleaned up by @wireguy in changeset 183325246

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183325246
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:09:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
Frank Peng (2026-04-02 04:45:07+00:00): Roads need to be connected to each other. Otherwise, people can't access them. The service roads you mapped (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1495143714 and openstreetmap.org/way/1495143715) are very close to each other but not connected to each other.

Also, it's good practice to modify the geometry of existing map elements instead of deleting them and remapping them anew. This helps preserve their editing history on OSM. You deleted an existing service road in this changeset (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/19836998/history) and remapped it anew. So it's good practice to modify the geometry of existing roads instead of deleting them and remapping them anew.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180728637
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:09:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
jhaluska80 (2026-04-02 21:47:01+00:00): A lot of your buildings aren't square.  hit the Q key when done and they'll look better.
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:00:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
eggie (2026-04-01 17:44:59+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  Meestal wordt bij art 461 access=private getagd, maar soms is het pragmatisch gezien beter permissive te taggen. dat laatste routeert en dat is wel handig voor bezorgdiensten. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
s3488 (2026-05-24 18:04:25+00:00): Bedankt Eggie! Ik ken de straat en zal daarom alsnog access=private taggen; de route via Tolhuisweg is beter voor bezorgdiensten e.d.
フーヴァー　リー (2026-04-02 12:06:52+00:00): 怎么总感觉这个编辑里面嘉善地铁你写得有点问题呢
DDD丶Samuel (2026-04-02 12:31:11+00:00): 我知道了，市域铁嘉善火车站站和国铁嘉善站是两个站。我还以为是railway=rail的问题呢
フーヴァー　リー (2026-04-02 13:18:52+00:00): 还有两点，一点是railway=rail的问题，嘉善地铁在水乡客厅前差了一点，而上海地铁示范区线多了一点。其他就是因为线路在建（非单线）但是并没准确复线位置，写from和to不太合适，线路开通后应该分别在name中写入xx -> xx，最后外面套一个线路主线。
DDD丶Samuel (2026-04-02 13:37:31+00:00): 关于railway=rail的问题我想多说一句：OSM上区分railway=rail和railway=subway的标准为该线路是否受国家铁路局（NRA）监管。而根据2024年6月发布的《关于加强城际铁路、市域 (郊) 铁路监督管理的意见》，明确规定市域、市郊铁路纳入NRA管理，因此2024年6月之后开通且使用CRH6系列或SRC系列动车组的市域（郊）线路均应标记为railway=rail。按照这个标准，水乡线、嘉塘线、示范区线、南枫线、如通苏湖线等，均应标记为railway=rail，且相关基础设施的绘制标准和国家铁路一致
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:06:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
eggie (2026-04-01 17:48:57+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  De club staat al getagd op de adresnode. Ik heb een tag voor clubhuis toegevoegd. Jouw bijdrage heb ik verwijderd. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
NeisRevert (2026-04-02 06:39:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/180751717
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
eggie (2026-04-01 17:54:37+00:00): Welkom bij OSM,
Bedankt voor uw bijdrage.
MVG
eggie
validator
eggie (2026-04-02 06:47:23+00:00): Wellicht office=lawyer?
WRA Juristen (2026-04-02 07:36:19+00:00): Ja!
eggie (2026-04-02 07:39:48+00:00): Aangepast.. thx.
streckenkundler (2026-04-01 19:29:40+00:00): Spannend... übrigens wird wohl ab Ende 2026 die Bahnstrecke Lübbenau-Cottbus voll gesperrt... Es wird das zweite Gleis wiederhergestellt...
Ich vermute aber, daß der Radweg nicht so lange gesperrt bleiben wird...
Ach wir werden sehen...

Danke,

Sven
eggie (2026-04-01 17:52:14+00:00): Deze toevoeging heb ik aangepast naar clubhuis.
De standaardkaart laat niet alle sporttoevoegingen zien.
literan (2026-05-06 06:32:54+00:00): не надо ставить тег natural=wood на полигон, не являющийся лесом. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4232310
AntSom (2026-05-06 19:04:54+00:00): Hi literan. Thanks for letting me know about that and for updating the relation.

Have a great rest of your day,
AntSom
NeisBot (2026-04-01 16:18:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13698822724 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Car dealership"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-09 16:33:33+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181106923
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
db-ak (2026-04-02 19:58:40+00:00): Co miałeś na celu dodawać cycleway shoulder wszędzie?
Langlaeufer (2026-04-25 15:02:51+00:00): Hallo TornadoFang,
bei einem Weg der nur mit "Radverkehr frei" beschildert ist handelt es sich tatsächlich um einen Radweg oder Rad- und Fußweg. Nur wenn das Zusatzschild unter einem "Gehweg"-Zeichen hängt ist es ein Fußweg auf dem Radfahrer nur zu Gast sind. Nur dann gilt für Radfahrer grundsätzlich Schrittgeschwindigkeit. Von daher erfassen wir Wege mit nur Zn1022-10 mit highway?path und bicycle=designated, genauso wie Radwege mit Zeichen 240/1. Der Unterschied in der Beschilderung macht sich nur bemerkbar im traffic_sign-Tag oder im bicycle=yes/use_sidepath an der Fahrbahn.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen_kartieren

Grüße Langläufer.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180730570
TornadoFang (2026-05-03 14:39:45+00:00): Was soll ich nun konkret machen? Ich nutze: https://trafficsigns.osm-verkehrswende.org/DE
Langlaeufer (2026-05-03 14:51:40+00:00): Leider ist das Tool nicht korrekt in diesem Punkt. Es macht einen deutlichen unterschied ob 1022-10  mit oder ohne 239 steht nämlich richtiger aber nicht benutzungspflichtigr Radweg vs. Gehweg mit Radverkehr in max Schrittgeschwindigkeit 

Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen_kartieren
TornadoFang (2026-05-03 14:59:24+00:00): Ah okay, das kann ich aus meiner Erfahrung heraus nicht wissen. Dann nehme ich das Wiki häufiger mal als Backup-Check.

 Eine andere Frage: Ich möchte in meiner Gemeinde kartieren und verbessern. In Sorsum an der Waldorfschule habe ich den Bürgersteig eingetragen. Ist das korrekt? Mir ist nicht ersichtlich, wann es gemacht wird. Meine Überlegung ist, dass ich die immer einzeichne, da ich es als Fußgänger als hilfreich empfinde, wenn mir angezeigt wird, wo ich am besten die Straßenseite wechseln sollte. Sonst zeigt er nur, dass ich an der Straße lang gehen soll. 

Ich habe auch vor, mich persönlich oder per Video-Schalte beim nächsten Treffen in Hannover vorzustellen.
*** Übersetzt mit www.DeepL.com/Translator (kostenlose Version) ***
TornadoFang (2026-05-03 15:50:24+00:00): Ich habe es zur Prüfung freigegeben.
qstep (2026-04-01 18:37:07+00:00): Please use contact:phone in Hungary.
infeeeee (2026-04-02 09:57:47+00:00): No rule for that, it's simply more common, but you can use whatever version you want. iD editor uses the non prefixed version, so it's hard to add the prefixed tag there.

About the changes: The kindergarten is tagged both as a way and as a node. This is wrong, none of them should be deleted: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
infeeeee (2026-04-02 09:58:52+00:00): Typo: *one of them should be deleted
infeeeee (2026-04-02 10:06:49+00:00): Fixed: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180759378
Fraxi (2026-04-01 16:45:37+00:00): Пропуснах да спомена, че прегледах допълнителни снимки за да видя дали сградата съществува-Bing;Esri World Imagery;Esri World Imagery(Clarity)Beta
NeisBot (2026-04-01 16:24:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13655189647 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Florist shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-09 16:33:36+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181106926
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
ajmat (2026-04-02 08:05:37+00:00): Reverted in changeset id: 180754335
pyram (2026-04-01 17:21:25+00:00): Hallo Lolekram,

würdest Du bitte nicht einfach die maxspeed löschen?
Siehe dazu Diskussionen im Forum. Zum Beispiel hier: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/implizite-geschwindigkeitsbeschrankungen-im-maxspeed-tag/93043

Gruß
pyram
Lolekram (2026-04-02 11:07:47+00:00): Hallo pyram,

ich habe die maxspeeds ja nicht gelöscht sondern sie durch maxspeed:type=DE:urban ersetzt. 
Im deutschen Wiki steht unter implizierten Geschwindigkeitsbegrenzungen: "Immer gebräuchlicher wird auch die Verwendung von maxspeed:type=<Ländercode>:<Zone>, [...] Dieser Schlüssel sollte anstelle von maxspeed=* verwendet werden."
Ich habe mir deine verlinkte Diskussion durchgelesen und dort scheint es auch kein "richtig" oder "falsch" zu geben, ob der maxspeed Wert mit Nummer noch bleiben sollte.
Ich bin der Meinung, dass er nicht dazu gehört, da sich der implizierte maxspeed von 50kmh in deutschen Städten von explizit durch Verkehrszeichen 50kmh ausgeschilderten maxspeed u. A. darin unterscheidet, dass das erste Radfahrer nicht betrifft, das zweite aber schon. Und so genau wie wir hier einiges anderes mappen, denke ich dass man das schon voneinander trennen sollte, da es ziemlich unkompliziert geht.

Gruß
Lolekram
pyram (2026-04-03 10:09:45+00:00): Ergänzen wäre in Ordnung. Ersetzen ist löschen des Zahlenwertes. Damit funktionieren einfache Anwendungen nicht mehr. Die Datennutzung erschwert sich damit erheblich!
pyram (2026-04-03 10:19:23+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:source:maxspeed
empfielt den Zahlenwert ausdrücklich.
Für https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:maxspeed:type=DE:urban gibt es nicht einmal eine beschreibende Wiki-Seite.
NeisBot (2026-04-01 16:33:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13665146705 v6

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Transportation office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-09 22:33:04+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181119763
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
NeisBot (2026-04-01 16:46:26+00:00): 🌍 OSM에 오신 것을 환영합니다, 그린그린.
기여해 주셔서 감사합니다!

협력을 더 쉽게 하기 위해 다른 사람들이 당신의 편집을 이해할 수 있도록 변경한 내용에 대한 짧은 설명을 추가하는 것이 좋습니다. 분명한 댓글은 커뮤니티가 당신의 작업을 따라가고 더 나은 피드백을 제공하는 데 도움이 됩니다. 좋은 댓글 작성 방법에 대한 팁은 여기[1]에서 찾을 수 있습니다.

✅ 여기에서는 지도 편집 내용을 기반으로 한 샘플 댓글이 있습니다: "주소 세부 정보를 포함하여 마을, 省, 거리, 집 번호, 전화번호가 있는 미용실 가게 추가"
(Auto-translation)
---
🌍 Welcome to OSM, 그린그린.
Thanks for contributing!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

✅ Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added hairdresser shop with address details, including town, province, street, housenumber, phone number"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment
Lostmonkey (2026-04-03 18:24:30+00:00): Et par spørgsmål ang. Skydebanen Rørvig shelterplads: Bør amenity=shelter og camp_site=basic bruges på ét punkt? Er shelter_type=sleeping_shelter noget andet end shelter_type=lean_to? Er tilstedeværelsen af capacity=15 (tre shelters) konstateret ved observation? På den linkede turistbureauside og på Udinaturen omtales kun ét shelter.
qrisztly (2026-04-03 19:49:45+00:00): Godaften. Godt fanget, det ettal er faret vild, der er kun et enkelt shelter. Jeg retter det i morgen. Jeg er meget i tvivl om hvordan den slags pladser bedst tagges. Vi har så mange turister heroppe og for de engelsktalende er 'shelter' gerne noget de forbinder med 'herberg', et ly for hjemløse, husvilde og fattige. Den fortolkning har vi desværre mødt nogle gange. Derfor mit forsøg med camp_site=basic, for at gøre det klart, at det er et rustikt campingsted, ikke et herberg for socialt udsatte. Men som sagt er jeg i tvivl om det er den bedste måde at gøre det på, så jeg forstår godt at du spørger. Ville du bare nøjes med amenity=shelter og så lade det være op til cykelturisterne selv at gennemskue det? Det gør de fleste uden tvivl, men vi har som sagt talt med nogle stykker, som havde misforstået konceptet. Mht. shelter_type=sleeping_shelter fanger du mig på mit skoleengelsk, det skal selvfølgelig være et lean to! Godt du fangede det, vi har lige fået et godt grin over det herhjemme. Man hører næsten Søvndals 'the ice is melting at the pøwles' eller Løkke, der sagde at han var 'banging the hammer', hehe. Jeg får det lige rettet i morgen.
Lostmonkey (2026-04-03 21:09:02+00:00): Standard for at tagge shelterpladser/primitive lejrpladser er 'tourism=camp_site + camp_site=basic' (evt. camp_site=standard). Jeg er ret sikker på, at man bør tilføje campingpladsen og shelteret som separate objekter.

Mht. at tage højde for engelske/udenlandske brugere, så nej, jeg vil ikke blot bruge 'amenity=shelter', men 'amenity=shelter + shelter_type=lean_to', hvorved det jo tydeligt angives, hvilken type shelter der er tale om. Det samme gælder, når du bruger 'camp_site=basic' om campingpladstypen. Det viser, at dette er en camp uden (ret mange) faciliteter. 

I princippet er der (i mine øjne) faktisk ingen grund også at lave en udførlige forklaring af det samme i description. Har man brugt fyldestgørende tags, er det op til brugerens app/kort at vise dette på en måde, der er til at forstå. 

Jeg har lave nogle rettelser, sådan som jeg vil foreslå at kortlægge det. Har i øvrigt også fjernet 'fireplace=yes', da det vist betyder, at der er en pejs (i shelteret?). Jeg har i stedet tilføjet et leisure=firepit, men positionen af det, er selvfølgelig gætværk.
qrisztly (2026-04-04 07:39:40+00:00): Jeg er enig og har nu fjernet description. Det må være op til folk selv at sætte sig ind i forholdene. Og vi skal jo helst heller ikke mappe specifikt til gps-apps og den slags, selvom det til tider kan være en balancegang, methinks. Jeg synes det er meget rart at kunne sparre lidt om ting der er en kende knudrede, så bliver resultatet bedre og mere ensartet. Fortsat god påske.
Lostmonkey (2026-04-04 08:29:07+00:00): Tak i lige måde 👍
NeisBot (2026-04-01 17:03:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13699133803 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Tree surgery company"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-09 22:33:08+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181119768
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
felipeeugenio (2026-04-01 18:35:05+00:00): Bien ahí. Nada que corregir.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180732373
Seyruun (2026-04-02 14:03:13+00:00): You updated it yourself, it just takes some time to render.
CGC University (2026-04-02 14:10:02+00:00): Hi,
Please updated my listing
NeisBot (2026-04-01 17:12:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13512989343 v5

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Auto repair shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisAgent (2026-04-01 22:33:41+00:00): 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again?
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-04 10:56:14+00:00): Reverted series of changesets adding SEO POI and blatantly promotional description=* and other malformed tags to it

https://osm.org/changeset/185084980
Dardug (2026-04-01 17:15:31+00:00): Nota 4033682
wireguy (2026-04-14 14:55:15+00:00): Kev, welcome to osm!  thanks for making all the updates.  The phone for Morningside Thai was missing a digit.   I've corrected it.  Thanks for adding the website info.   Keep mapping :-)
CyclingFellow (2026-04-01 17:24:39+00:00): Unsure about the priority tag. Review appreciated. People coming from south to north have priority. People coming from north to south must yield.
SafwatHalaby (2026-05-22 07:56:32+00:00): Hello Bertram. Kfar Kama appears to be a Circassian town whose main language is Adyghe (not Ukranian) even on some of the signs. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kfar_Kama 

Note the photos.

Do you think this edit might have been an error?
SafwatHalaby (2026-05-22 07:57:07+00:00): See also the Israel naming guidelines: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Israel#Naming

Specifically: 

he name=* tag should be used as the primary name, given in a single language selected like this:

    If there is signage with only one language, or one language more prominent than others (e.g. a shop's sign or a street name sign), use that language. This is the normal rule for name=*.
    Otherwise, use the language most commonly spoken in the area (usually Hebrew or Arabic).
    If two or more languages are equally common in the area, use your judgement or use the same language as nearby objects.
    Deviation from the priorities listed here is sometimes justified, for example if the local population prefers a different language from the signed one. In those cases, the reason for the selected language should be documented in note:name=* to inform other mappers.