piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Jancini (2026-03-05 09:23:03+00:00): hoi Eggie, ik snap je tweede punt niet; wat bedoel je met 'schuiven met de kaart', anders gezegd; wat heb ik net verkeerd gedaan los van het toevoegen van de poort, het opsplitsen van de weg en daarvan een gedeelte private maken? Ik lees het graag. mvg, Jancini
eggie (2026-03-05 09:29:44+00:00): Hoi,

Je hebt iets miniem verschoven aan de Langenholterdijk.
Misschien onbewust?
Het probleem met editor iD is dat je met de linkermuis selecteert, maar ook de kaart verschuift.
Wanneer je denkt de kaart te verschuiven gebeurt dat niet maar verplaats je een node.
Veel mappers hebben dat niet in de gaten. 

Er is overigens geen schade. 
Wanneer je editor JOSM zou gebruiken kan dit niet, want dan schuif je de kaart met de rechtermuisknop en selecteer je met de linker.

editor josm stap voor stap
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/editor-josm-stap-voor-stap/75047
Een aanrader dus. 

MVG
eggie
Jancini (2026-03-05 09:34:07+00:00): Hoi Eggie, dat was inderdaad niet bewust; zal er op letten en ik ga me eens in die JOSM verdiepen. groeten, Jancini
MappingMore (2026-03-06 11:40:46+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:179441905
NieWnen (2026-03-06 18:01:58+00:00): Dzięki!
Alliegaytor (2026-03-05 09:27:23+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Droundabout 
is an appropriate tag for roundabouts, you don't need to tag oneway=yes with that as well
dmlls (2026-03-06 21:50:21+00:00): Hola,

Ten en cuenta que el nombre no debe incluir nada que no sea el nombre (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres#Nombre_es_solo_el_nombre). En este caso "Urgencias e Instalaciones" sobra. Lo mismo con otros elementos que has creado.

Un saludo,
Diego
pedidos business (2026-03-08 11:22:17+00:00): Hola, se tiene en cuenta pero ese es su nombre:
https://maps.app.goo.gl/Z1yiTj6YR36ooYGb9
dmlls (2026-03-08 18:47:11+00:00): 🤯 vale entonces he dicho nada.

Gracias por tu respuesta!
Hugoren Martinako (2026-04-09 18:49:20+00:00): Curioso, el enlace a google maps ya tampoco existe, un mes después, lo que nos lleva de vuelta a https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/allegedly-fake-locksmiths/142942
dmlls (2026-04-10 06:20:41+00:00): Sí, a estas alturas está claro. Esta era la página web que aparecía asociada en Google Maps: https://sites.google.com/view/tucerrajeroalicanteurgenciasei/. Los enlaces de contacto abajo del todo (Facebook, Instagram, y YouTube) llevan a la página principal de esos sitios, y no a una cuenta específica.
pedidos business (2026-04-10 06:30:38+00:00): El perfil se ha suspendido en Google. Pero será restaurado, aunque lleva algunas semanas, ya que Google es muy estricto. Una vez sea restaurado no habria duda. Verdad?
CAM-Gerlach (2026-03-11 02:21:52+00:00): Hello, if you're going to use OpenStreetMap to promote your business/client, at the very least please take the minimum care to not add invalid tag values. "W" (West) is part of the street name ( addr:street=* ), not the house number ( addr:housenumber=* ), while the suite number is not part of the street name but rather is the unit number ( addr:unit=* ). And as you can clearly see, the name of the street is "West Atlantic Avenue"--everything should be written out in full on OpenStreetMap, so "West" not "W", "Avenue" not "Ave" and "Suite" not "STE". Same applies to your other changesets. Also, the standard format for phone=* in the US is +1-NNN-NNN-NNNN` (although spaces is at least a lot better than the spurious parenthesis in your other changesets).
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-04 04:42:42+00:00): Cleaned up malformed address, phone and top-level tags for SEO spam POI Hearing Partners of South Florida in changeset 183622671

https://osm.org/changeset/183622671
mueschel (2026-03-12 11:42:29+00:00): Please stop creating new accounts and importing your POIs one-by-one. Please read and obey the guidelines for imports and professional editing:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/6/62/Organised_Editing_Guidelines.pdf
ajmat (2026-03-06 07:18:14+00:00): Reverted in changeset id: 179429212
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-04 04:39:28+00:00): Cleaned up malformed address, phone and top-level tags for SEO spam POI Hearing Partners of South Florida - Boyton Beach in changeset 183622585

https://osm.org/changeset/183622585
NeisBot (2026-03-05 09:24:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 33 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1485623858 v1 | 4 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1485623869 v1 | 3 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1485623871 v1 | 3 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179386679
Wildsharky (2026-03-10 05:16:44+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:179471105
NeisBot (2026-03-05 09:30:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13619783910 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Reformas integrales empresa"

#MapWithoutSpam
Jordi MF (2026-03-06 01:39:20+00:00): Hola,
¿Podrías indicar la situación exacta del local comercial o de las oficinas? Ahora mismo está situado en la caseta de un transformador eléctrico, lo que parece incorrecto.
Un saludo.
MappingMore (2026-03-06 09:05:19+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:179433937, 179433856
eggie (2026-03-05 11:15:40+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-04 04:37:21+00:00): Cleaned up malformed address, phone and top-level tags for SEO spam POI Hearing Partners of South Florida - Delray Beach in changeset 183622528

https://osm.org/changeset/183622528
Stalker61 (2026-03-05 11:05:08+00:00): Весь беспредел и вандализм в откат. С таким подходом бан вы быстро заработаете.
ajmat (2026-03-06 06:35:36+00:00): Reverted in changeset id: 179428191
KhairoJuan (2026-07-19 02:24:52+00:00): Satellite imagery around these areas are old, some could be decades old. Please take these in consideration before making edits in these parts. Cheers.
Stalker61 (2026-03-05 11:05:02+00:00): Весь беспредел и вандализм в откат. С таким подходом бан вы быстро заработаете.
Hung Tran 9x0 (2026-03-30 01:05:47+00:00): Your POI edits created many issues. Did you check your edits before sending them? And why did you remove that WinMart+ store name?
Neonf (2026-03-30 08:38:02+00:00): I walked there and added some places with Organic Maps and also decided to fix WinMart+'s street. So I didn't know that app making some mess. Thanks for note about it. The rest places (newly added, not updated) is okay.
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-05 11:10:41+00:00): Hi Ka44ar15, welcome to OSM.

May we know the reason behind removing the name:en and name:fr of the following https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/961537745

Thanks.
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-05 11:14:24+00:00): I also noticed the name change from "شط الغراف" to "نهر الغراف الغراف" on this waterway.

Could you clarify the source for this name? The new version seems to repeat "الغراف" ...
G4rden3r (2026-03-05 10:25:22+00:00): Moin, das Feld zum Beschreiben deiner gemachten Änderungen ist zum nachvollziehen deiner Änderungen gedacht. Ein einfacher Punkt erfüllt das in keinster Weise. Achte bitte beim nächtlichen Mal dadrauf. (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:%C3%84nderungssatz#Tags_f%C3%BCr_%C3%84nderungss%C3%A4tze)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179388635
user_23188394 (2026-03-05 11:49:42+00:00): Spannend, dass das nach 120 Änderungen auch mal jemandem auffällt.
Stimme dir im Grundsatz zu.
Nachdem was mir hier an Verhalten von anderen Personen entgegengeschlagen ist, ist es aber leider das beste was ich noch anbieten kann.
Stalker61 (2026-03-05 11:04:55+00:00): Весь беспредел и вандализм в откат. С таким подходом бан вы быстро заработаете.
Stalker61 (2026-03-05 11:04:48+00:00): Весь беспредел и вандализм в откат. С таким подходом бан вы быстро заработаете.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-04 04:26:01+00:00): Cleaned up remaining SEO spam and incorrect tags and geometry from Nihapa Tours building/POI in changeset 183622264

https://osm.org/changeset/183622264
eggie (2026-03-05 11:19:28+00:00): Dag AvNVRZL,

Lijkt me oke zo. Nuttige aanvulling

MVG
eggie
NeisBot (2026-03-05 10:21:48+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13619875140 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Health clinic"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-03-13 17:33:08+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/179459103
Firefishy (2026-03-05 13:16:46+00:00): Welcome! And Happy mapping. Thank you for bringing local knowledge.
MappingMore (2026-03-08 10:48:14+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:179527024
Binzy_Boi (2026-03-10 22:17:25+00:00): Hi MappingMore,

Sorry to ask, but I'm looking at the changeset in which you made the partial revert, and I'm having trouble telling what was reverted. Would I be able to get a quick explanation so that I can avoid the same mistake in the future?
MappingMore (2026-05-28 09:56:18+00:00): Hi Binzy_Boi,
Thank you for reaching out - I am very happy to help. You added highway that was not splitted at crossing (node/7115276666) as it should have been. Additionally, you removed the building=yes tag (way/777864613) and added area=yes tag, which is incorrect accoring to OSM wiki guidelines. Please refer to the OSM wiki link for better mapping practises in the future.

Happy Mapping!
limes11 (2026-03-05 11:26:36+00:00): Hallo

man erkennt hier gut eine Zufahrt zur 9a von Süden. Diese ist auch in ALKIS verzeichnet. Sie ist nicht durchgehend, aber eine komplette Löschung ist hier nicht korrekt. 

VG
309_308_307 (2026-03-05 11:54:57+00:00): Hallo, ich hab die Straße heute beim Wandern gesucht und nicht gefunden. Da er sonst nur auf Google Maps zu sehen war, bin ich von einer Trap Street ausgegangen und hab die Straße gelöscht. Die eine Grundstückszufahrt kannst du ja ruhig ergänzen, aber eine richtige Wohnstraße ist das in keinem Fall.
limes11 (2026-03-05 18:32:17+00:00): Ich habe dies korrigiert. Der Weg muss vor Ort gut sichtbar sein, es ist die Zufahrt zu mehreren Häusern. 
Generell bitte nicht anhand von Vermutungen basierend auf google Objekte löschen. Es gibt exzellente erlaubte Luftbilder, ALKIS, den Webatlas, genug Quellen in Hessen, die vor einer Löschung konsultiert werden sollten. 

Habe es nun als service erfasst.
casoum (2026-04-02 11:59:22+00:00): Bonjour Pierre,

Je pense que c'est probablement dupliqué avec le n13598477285 (pompe a vélo) ?

Cordialement,

Casoum
NeisBot (2026-03-05 10:48:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/1079031611 v5

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "hotel en la costa Brava"
---
Por ejemplo, una versión más neutral y objetiva de tu texto podría ser: "hotel en la costa Brava"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-03-13 17:33:09+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/179390724
NeisBot (2026-03-05 10:51:53+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13619915939 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Business services building"
---
Por ejemplo, una versión más neutral y objetiva de tu texto podría ser: "Edificio de servicios empresariales"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-03-13 17:33:10+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/179391158
CAM-Gerlach (2026-03-14 17:54:00+00:00): Removed this now-duplicate node in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179869733 as you added the same tags to the building, and in any case it is missing a top-level tag meaning it won't actually display as anything on the map regardless. Moved the phone number to the building way (that was only on the node for some reason) in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179869861
uk_mapfan_2025 (2026-03-06 16:27:14+00:00): Hi; I have reverted this change set, as the restrictions you applied are currently suspended and have been for over a year now, as already marked with a note on the road. 

Reverted in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179453763
World_Winner (2026-03-07 03:19:30+00:00): Hi uk_mapfan_2025,
Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you.
NeisBot (2026-03-05 11:12:46+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13619915939 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Office building"
---
Por ejemplo, una versión más neutral y objetiva de tu texto podría ser: "Edificio de oficinas"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-03-13 17:33:11+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/179391787
eggie (2026-03-05 11:17:13+00:00): Hi,
I merged your info with the present addressnode.
Gr eggie
NeisBot (2026-03-05 11:21:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13619915939 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Oficina de servicios"
---
Por ejemplo, una versión más neutral y objetiva de tu texto podría ser: "Oficina de servicios"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-03-13 17:33:12+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/179391787
EfreetSK (2026-03-06 07:56:28+00:00): Kontroloval som teraz moje zmeny a narazil som na 2 chyby z tejto sady. Domy

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1126721669
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1126721671

sú naozaj vo výstavbe. "Dlhodobej výstavbe", asi im došli peniaze

Zlá fotka ale toto sú oni
https://imgur.com/jszqGOL
Dodko (2026-03-06 08:01:53+00:00): Na leteckej vyzerali hotové, tak ich zmeňte na building=construction
EfreetSK (2026-03-06 08:06:28+00:00): ok, zmenené
Taya_S (2026-03-16 08:11:29+00:00): Reverted petty vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179935207
jb54osm (2026-03-05 14:56:50+00:00): Iris straalt me eens per week toe vanaf de Jasmijn. Die Liguster 20 zal een vertikking zijn van 202, het managementkantoor van de Mall.
Ik haal de FixMe weg.
TrickyFoxy (2026-03-05 12:17:39+00:00): Прекратите, пожалуйста, свои эксперименты. Развекайтесь в песочнице https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org
Stalker61 (2026-03-05 11:59:00+00:00): Весь беспредел и вандализм в откат. С таким подходом бан вы быстро заработаете.
mavl (2026-03-06 16:01:30+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок добавляет непрямоугольное здание. Здание на спутниковом снимке прямоугольное. Здание исправлено.
Ozon_OSM11 (2026-03-12 19:19:15+00:00): Здравствуйте, спасибо за исправление, буду внимательнее.
007Transformer (2026-03-06 10:16:31+00:00):  Reverted in changeset id: 179437178
Stalker61 (2026-03-05 11:59:13+00:00): Весь беспредел и вандализм в откат. С таким подходом бан вы быстро заработаете.
NeisBot (2026-03-05 12:03:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 8 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/541551861 v5 | 5 crossings
https://osm.org/way/871452786 v2 | 3 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/5236556601 v3

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179393355
NeisReview (2026-03-13 17:33:13+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/179434069
kubahahaha (2026-03-05 17:29:55+00:00): It's not correct tagging - see
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dcaravan_site

it's not for places where you can set up a tent, nor service parking for campers.
kubahahaha (2026-03-05 17:30:31+00:00): I reverted that edit - Zanocuj w Lesie areas are not tagged in OSM, especially as caravan sites.
NeisBot (2026-03-05 12:21:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 13 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1485647010 v2 | 11 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/13619896790 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179393927
ssundell (2026-03-23 18:19:46+00:00): "Living street" on liikennemerkillä osoitettu pihakatu, siis erillinen katutyyppi ja yleensä osa yleistä katuverkkoa, ei mikä tahansa pihaan johtava tie. Jälkimmäiset merkitään tyypillisesti highway=service, service=driveway -merkinnöillä.
007Transformer (2026-03-06 09:53:13+00:00):  Revert of 179436006
mueschel (2026-03-12 12:45:01+00:00): Hi,
this way got two strange tags:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1483841037
convey =lift
conveying =plat

Could you describe what is present there to find the correct tags
Mike Steglich (2026-03-12 12:55:59+00:00): Thank you for the hint. It is simply a mistake. I will change it to amenity	= wheelchair_lift.

It is a wheelchair lift that can only be operated by zoo staff.
Mike Steglich (2026-03-12 13:09:44+00:00): sorry... this was to fast. Sometimes it makes sense to read the manuals. I changed it to highway=steps and platform_lift=inclined
Mike Steglich (2026-03-12 13:14:01+00:00): This error explains why my self-hosted OpenRouteService couldn't show a wheelchair-accessible route from the main entrance to the lions.
MappingMore (2026-03-08 11:01:09+00:00): Revert of 179384494
george1201 (2026-03-05 21:33:42+00:00): Hallo Moepmoep. Mit dieser Änderung hast du nicht nur das Tor, sondern auch die Friedhofsgrenze verschoben. Das sieht jetzt irgendwie kaputt aus.
Moepmoep (2026-03-08 17:23:09+00:00): Hmpf, das Verschieben von Punkten in SCEE ist anscheinend noch verbesserungsfähig.  Sollte jetzt wieder stimmen.
george1201 (2026-03-08 22:10:21+00:00): Es sieht zumindest nicht offensichtlich falsch aus.
Ich habe zwar keine Ortskenntnisse, würde aber vermuten, dass der Friedhof direkt hinter dem von dir neu eingezeichneten Tor beginnt. Dass also die Begrenzung des Friedhofs parallel zur Straße verläuft. Aber wie gesagt: Ist nur eine Vermutung, du warst vor Ort und kannst es besser beurteilen.

Zu StreetComplete: Das Tool finde ich ja gut, um an Objekten neue Attribute hinzuzufügen. Aber um Knoten zu verschieben oder neu anzulegen erscheint mir die Kartendarstellung viel zu grob und ungenau.
Moepmoep (2026-03-10 20:10:02+00:00): Die Frage zur Friedhofsgrenze kann ich nicht beantworten, aber man richtet wohl keinen Schaden an, sie über das (versetzte) Tor laufen zu lassen.  Hatte ich auch schon überlegt.  Ich mache das mal.

Das Verschieben geht schon ganz gut, man hat ja auch noch Längenangaben und GPS im Feld zur Verfügung, und selbst wenn eine Position nicht ganz genau ist, ist 5 m Versatz besser als 50 m.  Richtig problematisch ist ein Punkt, der mit mehreren Linien verknüpft ist.  Das wird nämlich überhaupt nicht angezeigt.  Daß das Tor entlang der Straße verschoben wurde war ja gewünscht, aber daß sich die Friedhofsgrenze bewegt nicht.  Man muß sich wohl für Poller, Umlaufgitter und Tore einen Hinweis setzen, um das zu Hause nochmal zu prüfen.  SCEE zeigt eben nur Punkte, Wege und begehbare Flächen an.  Andere linien und Gebiete leider nicht.
Moepmoep (2026-03-10 20:16:34+00:00): So, jetzt müßte es besser passen.
george1201 (2026-03-10 21:50:53+00:00): Gefällt mir. Danke.
Taya_S (2026-03-16 08:06:39+00:00): Reverted vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179935029
Taya_S (2026-03-16 08:04:17+00:00): Reverted vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179934944
Taya_S (2026-03-16 08:04:18+00:00): Reverted vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179934944
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-03-11 02:14:14+00:00): Reverted obviously incorrect change of a commercial building to a detached house by the same SEO mapper that added a business there

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179665406
mueschel (2026-03-12 11:41:17+00:00): Please stop creating new accounts and importing your POIs one-by-one. Please read and obey the guidelines for imports and professional editing:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/6/62/Organised_Editing_Guidelines.pdf
NeisBot (2026-03-05 12:54:39+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 11 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1343524721 v5 | 11 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179395315
NeisReview (2026-03-13 17:33:14+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/179396733