piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Udarian (2026-06-16 17:08:32+00:00): In Miami Dade unless the sidewalk empties directly into the road (is a strait line out of the road) crossing ways should not touch sidewalk centerlines. Basically the min standard for geometry is PWG silver tier https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Foundation/Local_Chapters/United_States/Pedestrian_Working_Group/Guide .

Happy mapping,
Udar.
Udarian (2026-06-16 17:11:52+00:00): also please do not add crossing=marked in Miami Dade, it should be crossing=unmarked (due to legacy reasons)  crossing=uncontrolled and crossing=traffic_signals.
Dzmitry_Nikulin (2026-06-17 08:59:45+00:00): Hello Udar! Thanks for reaching out and sharing the local know-how! I'll definitely align my future edits with the local guidelines. Happy mapping! Best, Dzmitry Nikulin
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184184848
Fizzie-DWG (2026-06-19 06:59:22+00:00): Reveted b 184300591
Fizzie-DWG (2026-06-19 06:59:30+00:00): Reveted b 184300591
Fizzie-DWG (2026-06-19 07:03:53+00:00): Reverted by 184300738
Fizzie-DWG (2026-06-19 07:04:17+00:00): Reverted by 184300738
t_ja (2026-06-16 19:36:21+00:00): Aky je dovod pokrivit geometriu Suvorovovej ulice, ked podla Ofmozaiky je takmer rovna: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6786690485 ?!
Taktiez znacit neexitujuce prechody je uplne zle, kedze na danom mieste nie je nic, co by prechod aspon naznacovalo (napr. sklopene obrubniky, dlazba pre nevidiacich alebo aspon znacka ze sa jedna o prechod pre chodcov - sice bez zebry), napr. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1530092385
Len to by si "niekto" musel aspon raz otvorit OSM Wiki a nastudovat si, ako sa to ma robit a zistil by, ze to nesplna crossing=unmarked: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:crossing=unmarked?uselang=sk
Rovnako znacit aj body ako crossing=unmarked je uplne mimo reality: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13945560253

Aby fungovalo vyhladavanie tras pre pesich, tak sa cesty (od jedneho obrubnika po druhy) predstavujuce neexistujuce prechody pre chodcov mapuju ako highway=footway + footway=link: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:footway=link
A body, kde sa takyto neexistujuci prechod krizuje s ulicou samotnou sa znaci cez crossing=informal, ale bez highway=crossing (a taktiez bez ostatnych "crossing*" tagov), vid: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:crossing=informal
Prosim oprav si to po sebe.
Fizzie-DWG (2026-06-21 02:23:51+00:00): Reverted by 184373657
Fizzie-DWG (2026-06-21 03:04:20+00:00): Revert by 184374216
Fizzie-DWG (2026-06-21 03:08:01+00:00): Revert by 184374269
Fizzie-DWG (2026-06-21 03:09:41+00:00): Revert by 184374287
sannkc (2026-06-21 03:59:31+00:00): Reverted in changeset #184374879
Fizzie-DWG (2026-06-21 03:16:52+00:00): Revert by 184374382
Fizzie-DWG (2026-06-21 03:18:12+00:00): Revert by 184374407
pinkhousemaps (2026-06-16 19:05:35+00:00): Please avoid long text for SEO or promotional purposes in your description
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184185419
Fizzie-DWG (2026-06-21 03:19:29+00:00): Revert by Changeset 184374420: DWG revert - improper mapping & deletion of valid features
Fizzie-DWG (2026-06-21 03:21:24+00:00): Revert by 184374438
Fizzie-DWG (2026-06-21 03:23:40+00:00): Revert by 184374438
Fizzie-DWG (2026-06-21 03:25:51+00:00): Revert by 184374493
Fizzie-DWG (2026-06-21 03:26:51+00:00): DWG revert - incorrectly deleted validly mapped features

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184374511
Fizzie-DWG (2026-06-21 03:28:13+00:00): DWG revert - incorrectly deleted validly mapped features

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184374534
Fizzie-DWG (2026-06-21 03:39:32+00:00): DWG revert - incorrectly deleted validly mapped features

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184374657
Fizzie-DWG (2026-06-21 03:40:23+00:00): DWG revert - incorrectly deleted validly mapped features

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184374669
Fizzie-DWG (2026-06-21 03:41:44+00:00): DWG revert - incorrectly deleted validly mapped features

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184374682
Fizzie-DWG (2026-06-21 03:41:45+00:00): DWG revert - incorrectly deleted validly mapped features

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184374682
Fizzie-DWG (2026-06-21 03:43:37+00:00): DWG revert - incorrectly deleted validly mapped features

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184374706
Fizzie-DWG (2026-06-21 03:43:38+00:00): DWG revert - incorrectly deleted validly mapped features

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184374706
t_ja (2026-06-16 19:12:09+00:00): Ahoj,
prosim needituj OSM data na viacerych miestach sucasne v jednej sade zmien. Spravny postup je upravit OSM data v meste Gbely v jednej sade zmien, a potom upravit data v Ziline v druhej sade zmien. 
Ked sa to nedodrzi, tak je v historii OSM zbytocne zaznam pre cele uzemie medzi tymito dvoma miestami. Cize ked si niekto v Trencine, Novom Meste nad Vahom, Uherskom Brode alebo Otrokoviciach klikne na historiu zmien v danom meste, zobrazi sa mu tvoja sada zmien, hoci realne na tychto miestach nic nie je zmenene ☹️
Duški Kubov (2026-06-17 08:10:38+00:00): Ahoj, ďakujem za upozornenie. Určite to nebol zámer, pravdepodobne mi niečo ostalo ešte z predošlých zmien v Žiline neuploadované a tak sa mi to prenieslo, keď som to odpálil aj so zmenami v Gbeloch. Dám si na to väčší pozor.
ajmat (2026-06-18 08:39:13+00:00): Reverted in changeset id: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184260129
Gitasaleh Virast (2026-07-06 11:24:21+00:00): شما، ناقض سند شهرداری تهران بودید.
شهرداری در تهران نهاد حاکم است نه ویرایشگر زرافه‌ای اوپن‌استریت‌مپ!
ref(ارجاع و مراجعه) که کدگذاری هم هست، را برداشتید.
با گیتاصالح، اوپن‌استریت‌مپ زیباتر می‌شود
Fizzie-DWG (2026-06-21 03:45:24+00:00): DWG revert - incorrectly deleted validly mapped features

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184374728
JezCrow (2026-06-18 13:31:00+00:00): Hi Sub_Zero2708,
Whilst I can see the value of the 15 landuse areas you've added, I see no justification in deleting the valid work of other mappers (also 15 features) including 8 buildings, a stream and breaking parish boundaries again. And the reason you are giving is "." as @woodpeck said before is not sufficient explanation.
JezCrow (2026-06-18 14:09:51+00:00): Deleted objects restored

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184273527
World_Winner (2026-06-17 10:00:55+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: 184218583
sannkc (2026-06-20 00:29:17+00:00): Reverted in changeset 184336046
Fizzie-DWG (2026-06-21 02:49:09+00:00): Reverted by 184374020
Fizzie-DWG (2026-06-21 03:52:06+00:00): Revert y 184374810
sannkc (2026-06-20 00:25:20+00:00): Reverted in changeset 184335994
sannkc (2026-06-21 03:52:39+00:00): Reverted in changeset #184374812
Fizzie-DWG (2026-06-21 03:53:15+00:00): Reverted by 184374812
Omnific (2026-06-17 15:44:02+00:00): Hello, these are not no access roads, as you've tagged them. No access roads cannot be used by anyone. They are private or destination roads. I will correct.
AmyEMower (2026-06-17 16:38:13+00:00): Thanks - how do you mark as private versus no access?
Omnific (2026-06-17 16:47:47+00:00): If you're using iD (the web editor), there should be a drop-down on the road access options in the left pane. There are a bunch of choices, but depending on the situation, private may be better (private theoretically means it can only be used by the owner). Destination is probably most appropriate, since it means that people can drive down the road if they are going to a property on the road - like visitors or deliveries - but indicates that other users, like through traffic, are not allowed.
AmyEMower (2026-06-17 16:51:40+00:00): Thanks - I see the access codes you are mentioning.  It appears that foot access would also be either private or destination only since there is specifically a private sign at the entrance of the road.  In Googling whether someone is allowed to traverse these roads on foot, I am getting the answer that we are not (legally)...  so I'd assume foot access would also be either destination or private?
Omnific (2026-06-17 16:54:28+00:00): Yeah, you're almost certainly right. I just left those alone since car access is the bigger issue for most people (they don't want random people driving down their road).
sannkc (2026-06-20 03:26:09+00:00): Reverted in changeset #184338077
sannkc (2026-06-21 03:49:39+00:00): Reverted in changeset #184374775
juni_vv (2026-06-16 19:55:01+00:00): Dont forget to add parking=surface to parking lots :))

- June <3
sannkc (2026-06-21 03:46:53+00:00): Reverted in changeset #184374743
yelisey90 (2026-06-16 16:09:17+00:00): rv - already mapped, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9413298121

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184189409
Gitasaleh Virast (2026-06-20 05:41:06+00:00): کدگذاری معابر اشتباه نیست و درست است.
منبع یافت شد: https://shaghool.ir/Files/286177_6-8-314-2.pdf
iuvi (2026-06-16 16:57:16+00:00): вы оставляете названия старые тегом name:old=... ?
Bienson (2026-06-17 00:22:45+00:00): Unsinniges Tagging, bitte korrigieren.
Bienson (2026-06-17 00:25:20+00:00): Achso, nur Geschäftsstelle, kein Baumarkt. Dann ok.
AskManav (2026-07-16 07:54:32+00:00): The route is gone. Thick grass impossible to hike through.
yelisey90 (2026-06-16 16:54:40+00:00): rv - addresses already present at https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19640789 & https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19590999 ; check e.g. OrganicMaps, addresses are assigned to buildings automatically

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184191360
qstep (2026-06-16 18:47:21+00:00): Üdv. Eötvös köz a régi név címkében már fel volt véve. Mi szerepel az utcanévtáblán a helyszínen?
vasony (2026-06-20 12:37:28+00:00): Az Eötvös köz név 2013-ban megváltozott Gábor Miklós utcára, ez van a táblán is, visszaállítottam.
qstep (2026-06-16 18:50:20+00:00): Üdv. Alapvetően nem törlünk pontokat az előzmények megőrzése miatt! Ha nyílt helyette más, akkor azt kellene beírni, ha bezárt de még ott a neve, akkor disused:shop, ha pedig üres üzlet, akkor shop=vacant. Beállítottam disused-ra.
PouleNoire (2026-06-19 17:38:47+00:00): Bonjour, où est l'intérêt de changer les églises d'un bâtiment à un point ?
Yunan973 (2026-06-20 16:21:12+00:00): Bonjour,
je ne sais pas si tu connais l'outil OSMI qui montre un grand nombre d'anomalies (erreurs mais aussi simples avertissements) sur différents éléments.
Pour les surfaces, lorsqu'elles sont indiquées avec un rôle différent d'outer/inner, l'outil donne un avertissement.
Pas très grave j'en conviens, sauf qu'à terme cela peut donner cela https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=19.92109&lat=52.18892&zoom=7&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.50&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways
rendant inutilisable l'outil car il y a des "anomalies" partout : impossible de discerner les vrais erreurs (par exemple une ile au milieu d'un lac indiqué, au lieu d'inner, comme outer voire i suite à une faute de frappe).
Lorsqu'on remplace les POI de type surface en POI de type point, ce qui est bien sûr possible, ces "anomalies" disparaissent.
Depuis plusieurs semaines je nettoie la France de tout ce qui est signalé pour les surfaces, ce qui à terme permettra de mieux rendre visible les nouvelles anomalies https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=4.06453&lat=46.63453&zoom=6&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.50&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways
Yunan973 (2026-06-20 18:45:34+00:00): Ça, c'était sur la forme.
Sur le fond, séparer bâtiment et fonction est à mon avis plus exact : en effet, les paroisses ne sont responsables que de la fonction lieu de culte (amenity=place_of_worship), les bâtiments eux n'appartiennent pas à la paroisse, ils appartiennent, en France tout au moins, aux communes. Dire que les bâtiments appartiennent à la relation paroisse était donc erroné.
PouleNoire (2026-06-21 07:00:21+00:00): Cependant, séparer bâtiment et église pose des problémes d'affichage sur certain site qui utilise OSM pour  afficher des POIs, etc... Donc je vais juste retirer le place of worship de la relation, certaines églises n'étant probablement plus utilisées (ex: l'église de Chantegéline).
PouleNoire (2026-06-21 12:25:19+00:00): Mais sont encore sacralisées*
Yunan973 (2026-06-28 12:48:34+00:00): Quels sites ont des soucis d'affichage ?
car séparer le bâtiment de la fonction est fréquent (ehpad, clinique, hôtel...)
PouleNoire (2026-06-29 13:00:54+00:00): OSM. Les églises sont de couleurs différentes, ce qui permet de les différencier des habitations.
boomboom14 (2026-06-26 19:54:19+00:00): is the highway there already under construction? i couldn't find any info about it. you should switch it to highway=proposed for now (unless it is already under construction)
yelisey90 (2026-06-16 18:06:46+00:00): reverted - definitely no road like that, check street-level photos

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184194506
Elizen (2026-06-17 15:46:28+00:00): Hello, thanks for your comment. I've created a service road between the buildings and made some other changes. Could you validate it?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184228367
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184230900
yelisey90 (2026-06-17 20:12:03+00:00): Yes, seems good, thanks! Left a note about access tag
felipeeugenio (2026-06-16 20:02:59+00:00): Hola. Cuál es la fuente de las alturas?
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184194049
birimkulova (2026-06-17 11:51:24+00:00): Hello! Thank you for your comment. Your remarks will be taken into account. Thank you.
AgusQui (2026-06-18 04:54:11+00:00): Este cesped está pobremente mapeado, cubre zonas de edificios, caminos, etc
AgusQui (2026-06-18 04:54:14+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1530170608
eggie (2026-06-16 19:24:28+00:00): Hoi.. Het zou zomaar kunnen als er een C15 staat.
Staat dat er niet dan taggen we bicycle=use_sidepath ipv no.
Dat heeft te maken met aparte categorieën fieysers.. breedte.. en in Duitsland met groepen wielrenners.
Gr eggie
martinfrancke (2026-06-16 20:09:21+00:00): Beste Eggie, Wederom bedankt voor je waardevolle feedback! Er staat inderdaad geen C15, dus ik heb het aangepast🙂. Goet, Martin
martinfrancke (2026-06-17 03:17:21+00:00): Beste Eggie, Is het in dergelijke situaties ook voor mofa en moped gebruikelijk om use_sidepath te gebruiken?
eggie (2026-06-17 05:36:25+00:00): Uiteraard
martinfrancke (2026-06-17 05:48:24+00:00): Bedankt voor je snelle reactie! Ik realiseer me dat ik nog veel moet leren, maar ik ben erg gemotiveerd om hier steeds wat beter in te worden. Jouw feedback helpt daar enorm bij!
mueschel (2026-06-26 09:31:56+00:00): Hi,
what does "loitering_time_limit" mean? Is this the time a vehicle can be parked there? Or a time limit for people staying in the area?
pitscheplatsch (2026-06-16 18:34:51+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

I am not completely sure, but I think it is unusual to add the postal code at the beginning of a street name. 

Is that intentional?

Best regards, Pascal
TheGostRider (2026-06-17 11:55:12+00:00): Olá!!

Trabalho na prefeitura local, a partir do dia 30 jun, esta cidade passará a ter cep por logradouro, precisamos de uma forma de divulgar, por isso os "postal_code" na frente do nome da via.

Atenciosamente, TheGostRider
pitscheplatsch (2026-06-17 15:20:40+00:00): Gracias!
UmbraosmOSM (2026-06-19 14:37:03+00:00): você pode  criar uma conta no UMAP 
https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/pt-br/ e fazer um mapa com o codigo postal de todas as ruas e divugar ate no site da prefeitura, blog's, grupos locais, paginas web. 

essa forma de mapeamento  dos dados que você fez não é o padrão do OSM e por isso vai precisar de revisão desses dados.
pitscheplatsch (2026-06-16 18:32:45+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
Is the name real?
someone find out the name of this place (1087256325), v4
MxxCon (2026-06-16 21:07:15+00:00): Hello.
Could you please provide some supporting information that this drive is called Water's Edge?
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184195182
unitybelle (2026-06-17 15:44:37+00:00): How do I attach photos to show proof?
MxxCon (2026-06-18 20:43:21+00:00): The simplest way would be to upload https://imgur.com and link that image here :)
unitybelle (2026-06-18 21:53:00+00:00): Done :) https://imgur.com/a/x05yEDP
MxxCon (2026-06-19 12:07:27+00:00): That's not a street name, but the name of this complex. These are very different things.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-02 07:52:04+00:00): Remove duplicate SEO spammer-added POI and merge relevant tags with existing correctly-tagged multipolygon

https://osm.org/changeset/184959783
eggie (2026-06-17 20:18:34+00:00): Dag Harmen,

Je info heb ik verplaatst naar de adresnode en de schooltag school toegevoegd.
Er loopt een pad door het gebouw. Klopt dat? Ik heb covered=yes toegevoegd. 


MVG,
eggie
harmenhuizinga (2026-06-17 20:29:31+00:00): Hoi Eggie,

Nee, er loopt geen pad door het gebouw. Waar je nu dat pad door het gebouw ziet lopen is een aanbouw die een jaar geleden ofzo is geplaatst. Ook is er nu een hek om het schoolplein geplaatst. Voorheen stond daar nooit een hek. Dat pad over het schoolplein is volgens mij nooit echt een "pad" geweest, maar een "doorgang" over het schoolplein toen er nog geen hek stond. 
Met dat hek + poort is er in ieder geval geen vrije doorgang meer over dat plein.

Harmen
eggie (2026-06-17 20:33:14+00:00): Oke Harmen..Haal dat pad maar weg. Ook dat losse stukje over het gebouw.
Mapse,
eggie
eggie (2026-06-18 06:41:15+00:00): Het voetpad (looproute) heb ik aangepast zodat het niet meer door het gebouw loopt.
bigbug21 (2026-06-20 11:31:28+00:00): Hallo pyram,
vielen Dank für die Ergänzung des Defibrillators in Großhabersdorf. Ein Tipp dazu: Mit wenigen weiteren Tags (siehe auch [1]) kann so ein Eintrag noch deutlich aufgewertet werden, etwa mit Informationen zur Zugänglichkeit und "Öffnungszeiten".

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:emergency%3Ddefibrillator
vergissmiNET (2026-06-16 21:30:44+00:00): Hm, it seems that there are two different versions on the AAT homepage. The overall map shows the old route, but if you click on Stage 30, the new route is shown. I guess we're gonna have to change the relation to the latter.
Old route here: https://www.alpe-adria-trail.com/de/etappen/
New route here: https://touren.kaernten.at/de/tour/fernwanderweg/etappe-30-alpe-adria-trail-breg-bei-golo-brdo-smartno/5579296/#caml=ajq,28hp49,7m3j4e,0,0&dm=1
CoryS89 (2026-06-17 01:21:21+00:00): I took a look at your contribution but are you sure that is a parking aisle? Looks more like a plain service road to me.
Wildsharky (2026-06-23 09:03:36+00:00): Reverted in changeset id: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184218861
pertile (2026-06-17 14:55:34+00:00): Me parece que esto está mal, es muy grande el edificio para ser solo primeros auxilios. Veo una nota que elevaron la categoría a Hospital y que se llama Doctor Tusso.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184196381
María Luz Rivoira (2026-06-17 16:55:26+00:00): Así aparece en maps
pertile (2026-06-17 17:50:38+00:00): No podemos copiar datos de Google Maps, es uno de los principios más importantes https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Preguntas_frecuentes#%C2%BFY_por_qu%C3%A9_no_utilizo_Google_Maps_para_mis_datos?

Y aunque pudiéramos, que esté en Google Maps no significa que esté bien. El centro cambió de nombre y categoría en 2021 https://www.eschaco.com/vernota.asp?id_noticia=119779
María Luz Rivoira (2026-06-18 11:59:31+00:00): Buenísimo, lo modifico
t_ja (2026-06-16 20:10:57+00:00): Ahoj,
aky ma vyznam davat brand=Privatbanka, ked v popise tejto sady zmien je jasne uvedene, ze sa premenovala na Penta Bank? 🙈
aceman444 (2026-06-16 20:23:37+00:00): Pretoze to tam tak bolo :)
Nie, lebo na wikidata zatial neexistuje Penta Bank, tak uvidim ci to niekto zmeni na existujucom wikidata id alebo bude nove.
Tak zatial som to nechal tak. Ak to navrhujete dat prec, tiez je to moznost, nie som proti.
Rick Richards (2026-06-17 07:56:37+00:00): Zdravim, zmene wikidata aj NSI. Po NSI refreshi staci updatnut tagy, kedze sa brand premenuje na Penta Bank.
pertile (2026-06-17 14:52:57+00:00): Hola, el dibujo este representa un edificio, no el hospital en sí que es un área mayor. Voy a revertir el cambio.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184196581
MappingMore (2026-06-17 12:02:50+00:00): Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184223327
MappingMore (2026-06-18 04:19:29+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184253011
habi (2026-06-18 11:33:00+00:00): Ciao Astucki
Genau wie bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184263458 bemerkt, ist diese Namens-Änderung bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6537087519 nicht der richtige Weg, um festzuhalten, dass dies ein Privatweg ist.
Gruss,
habi

PS: Rest folgt in anderen Kommentaren/Änderungen.
habi (2026-06-18 11:20:36+00:00): Ciao Astucki
Du hast hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/188374914 von einem Zugangsweg zu den Häusern zu einem Fussweg geändert, was so nicht stimmt.
Die Luftfotos zeigen hier auch, dass dieser Zugang asphaltiert ist, und keine "Dreck"-Oberfläche hat.
Ich habe `access=private` hinzugefügt, damit sicher keine Fahrzeuge hier durchgeroutet werden.
Gruss,
habi
habi (2026-06-18 11:26:41+00:00): Hier hab' ich alles ob dem Brawandsteg mit `access=private` versehen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184266889
PhysicsArmature (2026-06-16 19:54:12+00:00): Notice: Hashtags should have been usa,ca,la,sidewalk,sidewalks,crosswalk,crosswalks.
FajrAl (2026-06-17 10:38:57+00:00): apakah sudah mulai dalam pembangunan?
NorthCrab_upload (2026-06-19 03:13:22+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13946211555

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
qstep (2026-06-16 21:46:45+00:00): Üdv az OSM-en! A házszámokhoz úgy általában mi a forrásod? Elsősorban bejárás alapján visszük fel, másodsorban használható minden ODbL licenc kompatibilis forrás, pl nem régi Mapillary, Panoramax képek. Megjelöltél street level imagery mint forrás.
julijlucssij (2026-06-17 06:51:58+00:00): Hello!
Az utcakép téves forrásmegjelölés volt. Házszám saját forrás , pontosítva más adatbázisokkal. Végső pontosítás oeny.hu -ra támaszkodva szükség esetén.
qstep (2026-06-17 07:58:10+00:00): Saját forrás = helyszíni felmérés? Mik ezek a "más adatbázisok"?
ntzm (2026-06-17 12:38:58+00:00): Are these changes in place? I went down recently and work hadn't begun on these parts yet.
ntzm (2026-06-19 16:33:26+00:00): I visited today and these road changes have not been made yet. I have reverted your changeset in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184323831. OSM should reflect the current state of the world, not the future. I am however looking forward to these changes being in place in the future!