piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mapperFOS (2023-04-25 00:19:05+00:00): Erstellt anhand https://www.praxis-hofgartenplatz.de/
highflyer74 (2023-04-25 13:14:40+00:00): Moin und herzlich willkommen bei OSM!

Vielen Dank für deine Beträge. Ein paar kleine Tipps will ich noch loswerden:

- es ist nicht notwendig, die PLZ einzugeben, auch wenn Organic Maps den Eindruck vermittelt, dass dies wichtig wäre. So lange die Adresse selbst am Gebäude vorhanden ist, ist alles gut.

- Bei Ärzten kannst du (sofern vorhanden) auch "Dr. med." davor schreiben.

- Bei Firmen lässt man die Gesellschaftsform im Namen weg und schreibt sie nur in den operator=*

- Telefonnummern formatieren wir nach dem internationalen Standard. Das sieht dann so aus:

+49 xxx xxxxxx (Ortsvorwahl ohne führende "0")

Ansonsten sieht alles gut aus :-)

Wenn du Fragen hast, oder Hilfe brauchst, melde dich gern hier oder im Forum
 - https://community.openstreetmap.org/

Ansonsten hilft auch das Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page) oder ein Tutorial (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf).

Viele Grüße!
mapperFOS (2023-04-25 18:59:01+00:00): Moin !

herzlichen Dank für die Informationen! Hatte mich während dem Editieren bereits ein paar deiner angesprochenen Punkte gefragt, allerdings nichts dazu gefunden, weswegen ich mich entschied anhand von Beispielen zu agieren, die leider eben mit nationaler Vorwahl waren. Überarbeite gerade nochmal meine Änderungen und wünsche...

Viele Grüße!
mapperFOS (2023-04-25 00:18:04+00:00): Erstellt nach eigenem Besuch vor Ort.
mapperFOS (2023-04-25 00:17:37+00:00): Erstellt anhand https://casadelleolive.de/
mapperFOS (2023-04-25 00:17:05+00:00): Erstellt anhand https://www.noir-finest-sushi-cuisine.de/
mapperFOS (2023-04-25 00:16:32+00:00): Erstellt anhand https://www.noir-finest-sushi-cuisine.de/
Kovoschiz (2023-04-19 04:04:46+00:00): I made this `=primary` because it is Castle Peak Rd and Fan Kam Rd combined.
Kovoschiz (2023-04-19 04:38:09+00:00): And it's a continuation of the `=primary` Po Shek Rd
Frans S (2023-04-23 10:25:55+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings not accurate mapped.
B: Overlapping buildings drawn.
E: Most buildings are fair rectangular. Square them with the Q key when the object is selected.
* When buildings have protruding elements, they should be included into your mappings.
D: Please avoid that nodes of buildings link to other buildings or roads.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135081784
mapperFOS (2023-04-25 00:12:14+00:00): Aktualisiert anhand https://www.syracom.de/home.html
ovruni (2023-04-19 02:49:03+00:00): Hola, las veredas al ser vías que están diseñadas para peatones se etiquetan con highway=footway. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:highway%3Dfootway
Saludos
mapperFOS (2023-04-25 00:10:46+00:00): Anhand https://www.urologen-an-der-rue.de/ aktualisiert.
mapperFOS (2023-04-25 00:08:21+00:00): Nach eigener Begehung.
Trevor_1 (2023-04-22 17:32:07+00:00): Hello, it looks like you added an extra road where there is already one existing. I'm going to have to delete this.
MxxCon (2023-04-25 00:20:59+00:00): Hello.
Please note that it is inappropriate to map the whole building as a business if that business occupies only a part of the building, such as ground floor. In cases like this that business should be mapped as a separate node within the perimeter of the building.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135082524
limes11 (2023-04-19 05:53:17+00:00): Looks like complete nonsense. Should be reverted
Fizzie-DWG (2023-04-19 06:50:07+00:00): Reverted by DWG for vandalism: changeset/135087829
Fizzie-DWG (2023-04-19 06:52:09+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7065
Frans S (2023-05-12 15:03:59+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed.
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
E: Most buildings are fair rectangular. Square them with the Q key when the object is selected.
F: Buildings partially hidden under trees not drawn correctly. Extrapolate the rooflines.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135082761
rskedgell (2023-04-19 06:37:38+00:00): Please don't add fiction to the map. Fully reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135087390

#DWG
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135082845
adiatmad (2023-04-19 07:33:51+00:00): Hi, good work on your edits! However, it would be preferable to avoid adding a generic name, such as name=house (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1138631435). You might want to take a look at this page (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions).
Frans S (2023-05-06 13:32:38+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings not accurate mapped.
Buildings not squared.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135082895
❤️‍🔥 (2023-04-19 09:26:12+00:00): hey, it might be faster to do a bulk update for this tag if you're interested - my understanding is that the entire line between https://osm.org/node/10536363520 and palmerston north should have `railway:ctc=yes`?
Daniel Palenski (2023-04-19 20:35:00+00:00): I would like to a bulk update just don't know how. If you can help with that it would be nice.
❤️‍🔥 (2023-04-20 06:44:37+00:00): sure, the first step would be to query all the features you want to update - for example this query https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1tZI finds all ways (lines & areas) with "name"="North Island Main Trunk" but no "railway:ctc" tag

it's generally a good idea to do small sections at a time - you can limit your query to an area with the 🖼️ button on the map.

then you can click "export" to load the data into JOSM or the Level0 editor. I personally don't use JOSM but assume it has a method to select all features in a layer
Daniel Palenski (2023-04-26 03:11:47+00:00): Just tried JOSM it does allow me to add the tag to multiple sections at once. Which is a little better and faster
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135083301
phoenixsaigon1698 (2023-04-19 03:45:19+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Conditional_restrictions
user_5359 (2023-04-19 05:23:19+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice the difference between name and reference number (key ref)
xephos1one (2023-04-30 12:22:09+00:00): Hi,
sadly you made a mistake in this changeset by classifying an US Route only as secondary (and even missed sections at the western peaks and at Chimney Rock) - this should be changed back to primary.
Please have a look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States/2021_Highway_Classification_Guidance on how roads in the USA should be classified.
Regarding some other changes you've done, how to map intersections when there are dual carriageways: Please have a look at https://labs.mapbox.com/mapping/mapping-for-navigation/modeling-intersections-for-map-navigation/ that is linked at the Junctions Page on the OSM Wiki.

Please don't stop mapping because of this - I just gave you some hints for improvement :)
Fenley Jones (2023-05-01 16:58:52+00:00): While the preferred method of determining classifications may be via the number, when represented visually in the public map, roads appear very different than which they actually are. In this example, 74a appears visually as a 4 or 6 lane highway, when in reality, it is a narrow, winding, country road in many places, and not greater than 1 lane in each direction for the entire length I have corrected. In first article in which you have linked, the notice at the top states "These guidelines have been adopted by contributors in certain states as described in this article and represents the consensus view that highway classification is based on a road's topological importance in the long-distance road network."
emersonveenstra (2023-04-19 10:21:02+00:00): Hi,

Please stop changing the address and opening hours, you're breaking them. I've fixed it again, please do not touch it, thanks
Frans S (2023-04-19 08:10:27+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings often not accurate mapped.
Buildings not squared
Buildings overlap
Nodes of buildings connected to other buildings or features.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135083722
Cartographer10 (2023-08-06 12:00:38+00:00): Hey,

You have used natural=shrubbery here for large areas that are natural=scrub. Shrubbery is cultivated, often ornamental wood shrubbery often found in urban areas. See [1] for the wiki. For now, I changed the areas to natural=scrub.

Kind regards,
Vincent 

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dshrubbery
julcnx (2023-04-19 09:43:42+00:00): Hello Sumittra_GrabTH, kindly refer to this post for categorizing roads that are too narrow for motorcars:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/re-classifying-service-alley-and-other-narrow-roads-chiang-mai/97397
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135084379
Sumittra_GrabTH (2023-04-19 10:15:28+00:00): Already Fixed
SomeoneElse (2023-04-29 10:24:28+00:00): Hello,
You wouldn't happen to know where the footpath goes from https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4917476565 , would you?  It corresponds to a gap in the Wales Coast Path https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3285170#map=18/51.47376/-3.14538
Best Regards,
Andy
bxl-forever (2023-04-19 14:22:43+00:00): Hello,

According to UrbIS data, the building with housenumber 140 is the main building along the street, not this one at the back.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/237014306

OSM is a global database used by many people, it is very important to only add correct information into it.

Are you sure about this building?
user_5359 (2023-04-19 06:26:46+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I remove your SEO SPAM (mostly foreign keys)
HikeAndMap (2023-05-02 12:07:29+00:00): Hi -  thank you for trying to help - but you made so many edits not following the OSM conventions . Like adding a path on top of a sidewalk..

or totally screwing up existing jeep lines and adding Long Long PUJ terminal to the NPC jeep line..

A lot of work for me to fix all these errors ..

if you like - I'm willing to sit together with you to show you how to update everything properly.
HikeAndMap (2023-05-02 21:33:48+00:00): Is Angel's Pizza already open?

I found their announcement for hiring staff - yet on their official page it's not listed yet as in operation.

https://www.angelspizza.com.ph/locations

https://www.facebook.com/groups/1932269080350504/posts/3508363439407719/

That's from April 28 - job hiring. Doesn't say it's opened already.

Features that are planned in the future - can be mapped - usually we don't - but it's doable - but then you need to properly set the tagging to let users of OSM know it's not yet open.
HikeAndMap (2023-05-02 21:42:22+00:00): You changed
Green Valley PUJ Terminal 
into
Green Valley Apugan PUJ Terminal 

the thing is - the Green Valley jeeps has different routes. One route has it's turning point somewhere around Carmel Heights.

Another has the turning point around Pula.

The reason I split them thus - is because they have different routes. Their stop position is also not the same - they're parked next to each other granted - but still not the same. 

Granted it's debatable to merge 2 routes into one - yet I think for the sake of customers especially tourists not being aware there's different jeeps - it's better on the map to also split them per route - the stop locations as well - so tourists know there are different jeeps some turn around at Carmel and some drive you all the way to Pula
Frans S (2023-04-19 14:21:07+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings need to be improved.
Please pay attention to next points:
Accurate mapping. (following extensions on rooflines)
Squaring rectangular buildings.
Connected nodes of buildings to other features.
Clustered buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135084828
Frans S (2023-04-23 10:03:43+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. however, many buildings were not squared properly.
Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key,
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135085190
Tilia_J (2023-04-19 18:00:49+00:00): Ik heb deze wijziging teruggedraaid omdat ik de reden verwijdering wat voorbarig vind.

De Gruyterpassage is niet gesloten maar begin deze maand na ingrijpende verbouwing juist heropend waarbij de losse winkels tot één grote zijn samengevoegd.

Hoe het er van binnen uit ziet en of de passage zelf nog als doorsteek voor niet-bezoekers van de winkel te gebruiken is, is mij onduidelijk.

Één of meer van de volgende punten zal moeten worden uitgevoerd om een concreet beeld van de huidige situatie te krijgen:

-Een survey (bezoek) ter plekke
-De Basisregistratie Adressen en Gebouwen (BAG) van het kadaster heeft als status: "Verbouwing verblijfsobject". Als de status wordt bijgewerkt kan het noodzakelijk zijn een nieuwe gebouwenimport op het OSM-forum aan te vragen *)
-Pas daarna kan de definitieve situatie ingetekend worden.

*) 
-Bij ieder gebouw dat niet op OSM staat, waarbij de vorm verkeerd is, of juist gesloopt is, moet de BAG gecontroleerd worden.
-Als de werkelijkheid niet klopt met wat er in de BAG staat, dan daar een terugmelding doen.
-Als de terugmelding verwerkt is of de BAG op een andere wijze bijgewerkt is, dan kan op de Openstreetmapcommunity een import worden aangevraagd.

BAG-viewer: https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/?objectId=0202010000858162&theme=BRT%20Achtergrond&geometry.x=190979.6755&geometry.y=443872.5285&zoomlevel=15

OSM-topic voor BAG-imports met voorbeeld die ik eerder vandaag deed: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/bag-importverzoeken/3394/728


Tot slot:
Je had enkel het inpandige deel van de passage verwijderd, de korte stukjes die buiten liggen had je laten staan.

Daarnaast is het consencus dat we niet zomaar wegen verwijderen maar ze "aan de zichtbaarheid te onttrekken" door een lifecycle prefix toe te voegen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
Rubenke (2023-04-24 12:22:34+00:00): Hoezo voorbarig???de winkel is al open  en is v echt niet meer zo. Zelfs de ingang zit nu ergens anders.  Er jammer dat je weer terug draait
Frans S (2023-05-11 14:38:20+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed during the validation process.
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not according to the HOT/ OSM requirements and quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
* Tagging of buildings. For HOTOSM projects, the standard tagging is 'building=yes'. No text adding.  Please keep that in mind at further mappings.
A: * Multiple buildings has been drawn as 1 building. Each building need to be mapped individually, without connecting nodes.
B: Overlapping buildings drawn.
E: Most buildings are fair rectangular. Square them with the Q key when the object is selected.
* When buildings have protruding elements, they should be included into your mappings.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135085293
Frans S (2023-04-19 14:39:25+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, at random or as requested. 

Please pay attention to next points:

I am sorry to say, but your mappings need some improvements.
Please pay attention to next points:
Map more accurate by following the rooflines.
Don't cluster buildings.
Square each rectangular building with the Q key



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135085555
Josef73 (2023-05-13 05:09:44+00:00): Hello, can you please check the value of the tag opening_hours. It has to be in English. Please look here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours
Thanks
Larmax (2023-05-13 08:45:14+00:00): Hi, It doesn't say that on the wiki page. I just used the wording that was on the ground.
Josef73 (2023-05-13 12:38:27+00:00): okay, no problem.
eggie (2023-04-19 07:24:24+00:00): Dag Cees.. De Fenkelstraat stond ook nog verkeerd. Ik het die richting ook omgedraaid. 

Groet
eggie
Strubbl (2023-04-20 15:51:31+00:00): Hallo da-sch, 

warum löscht du die Gebäude nur um sie dann neu zu zeichnen? Du hast hier in diesem Changeset auch die Informationen über den Gebäudetyp, die Etagen, Dachgeschosse und Dachformen gelöscht und beim Neuzeichnen nicht wiederhergestellt! Desweiteren ist die Objekthistorie durch das Löschen auch verloren gegangen. Das ist kein guter Mappingstil, diese ganzen Infos aus OSM herauszulöschen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Erhalte_die_Chronik%E2%86%99

Bitte benutze in zukünftigen Änderungen, wo du die Gebäude komplett neu zeichnen möchtest die Funktion Geometrie ersetzen in JOSM. Diese Funktion ist genau dafür gedacht, wenn man das existierende Gebäude komplett neu zeichnen möchte statt es nur anzupassen. Weiteres dazu im Wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history#Editing_techniques oder https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/utilsplugin2#Replace_geometry_(Ctrl+Shift+G)

Viele Grüße
Strubbl
da-sch (2023-04-20 17:26:40+00:00): Da muss ich echt sorry sagen! Warum auch immer habe ich übersehen, dass die Häuser noch weitere Werte haben. Wenn weitere Werte da sind und das Haus neu gezeichnet wird, mache ich auch Geometrie ersetzen, wie eben auch dort im Gewerbegebiet, oder passe das vorhandene an.
Strubbl (2023-04-20 17:41:38+00:00): Kein Problem, das passiert. Die Funktionalität Geometrie ersetzen ist echt super. Ich zeichne meist auch lieber komplett neu statt vorhandene Umrisse anzupassen. Das würde viel länger dauern.
da-sch (2023-04-20 17:45:16+00:00): Jupp sehe ich auch so. ;)
emersonveenstra (2023-04-19 10:53:34+00:00): Okay, I'm going to comment on this one changeset to reference all of your recent "egregiously mis-classified" changes.

First, please stop doing this. You are not the sole arbiter for highway classifications in Michigan, there's a group of us that have spent a lot of time going through the 2021 guidelines and bringing Michigan in line with them. Blasting through Michigan and changing them because you feel like you know what's right is very much not welcome and not tolerated, nor is it in the community-based, collaborative spirit of OSM. You calling them "egregiously mis-classified" means you do not understand the new highway guidelines or what we're trying to improve.

Therefore, I've reverted all of these changesets, just like I did 5 months ago when you last did this. I told you then to get in contact with us, either on Slack or the Wiki, and you never did. Next time you mass-change highway classifications in ways that are clearly against the 2021 guidelines, you will be reported for vandalism.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-04 18:31:30+00:00): name=Edelsteine
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6847185627

shop=edelsteine ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop or https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Tag_descriptions_for_key_%22shop%22 fitting? Maybe new value needs to be invented? Maybe this data is wrong and there is no shop here? Maybe it is not a shop but something else?
BCNorwich (2023-04-19 06:50:27+00:00): The changeset comment should have also referred to reverting fiction.
VLD549 (2023-05-13 06:57:36+00:00): Hi, to me it seems that 'rotonde' should remain. May I ask what source you used or what the decision is based on?
Thank you!
Nölke75 (2023-05-17 09:57:29+00:00): Hi, VLD549, i think your right.
I based this on change #101649311.
But in Pdok they used on every roundabout "rotonde".
But on the signs they don't use the word "rotonde".
MoiraPrime (2023-04-21 19:35:45+00:00): This is flat out unacceptable and should be reverted. There are now orphan power nodes all over the place due to this change.
woodpeck (2023-04-21 20:33:53+00:00): zluuzki, this edit has indeed removed valid and valuable data that had been much improved since being imported from TIGER, e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/13569197 - please revert your deletion. Replacing TIGER imports with well-done tracing is a commendable effort but you should only delete the lines at the time of re-tracing them, not months before, and you should not delete lines that have already been painstakingly re-traced (even if the users doing so have accidentally not removed the tiger:reviewed=no tag). [DWG issue #2023042110000114]