piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
KennyDap (2025-12-07 00:06:06+00:00): Fix Vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175605765
*Martin* (2025-12-07 09:05:47+00:00): Cau Peto. Davaj prosim access=private na tie sukromne bazeny, nech sa neobjavia v turistickych sprievodcoch :-)
Peter Hanecak (2025-12-07 19:34:29+00:00): OK, vdaka za upozornenie.
KennyDap (2025-12-07 00:05:43+00:00): Fix Vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175605756
KennyDap (2025-12-07 00:05:16+00:00): Fix Vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175605745
Fizzie-DWG (2025-12-07 02:12:23+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19123
Frans S (2026-01-13 11:57:32+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please do not connect nodes of buildings to eachother. Buildings are by default not connected to eachother.
Best regards
no details provided here (2026-01-07 10:42:32+00:00): Hi - can I assist with reshaping these domestic properties? They are most likely not quite shaped as mapped here but I can check/meet up in the next couple of weeks if needed. Thanks.
Ekeefoof (2025-12-06 17:05:45+00:00): Sorry falls in der Notiz https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5079013 ein Missverständniss entstanden ist, die Brücke ist nach der Flur benannt, nicht andersrum. Zur Namensherkunft der Flur habe ich auf die Schnelle nichts gefunden.
osmmapper222 (2025-12-06 17:14:31+00:00): Ah, okay. Dann reverte ich die Ergänzungen.
eggie (2025-12-06 18:17:56+00:00): Dag wiki..

Het heeft de voorkeur om op de adresnode bij te taggen en dan toevoegen club=sport sport=.....
Evt voor een clubhuis amenity=community_centre community_centre=club_home

Mvg
eggie
eggie (2025-12-07 07:53:39+00:00): Je bijdrage heb ik verwijderd.
De club staat hier al getagd op de adresnode.
clubhuistag toegevoegd.
MVG
eggie
Cucazer (2025-12-18 15:57:49+00:00): What? New aerial? Where? =D
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175593721
HellMap (2025-12-18 22:37:50+00:00): The 8th cycle of LĢIA/LVM aerial is now available for East Latvia from 2024 (and middle Latvia from 2023 since last year). But you have to register and sign a license individually to get (proper) access. See towards the end of: https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/358602-general/topic/LVM.20jaunumi/with/348419049 . It's the same aerial you can see on https://www.lvmgeo.lv/kartes .
aki007 (2025-12-06 20:59:12+00:00): Hi @njmccarthy11 . Welcome to OSM!

You asked for review - the road looks good to me. It's hard to see through the trees on aerial imagery and you anticipated well where it runs. Good job. 

I see you are adding this as part of a HOT tasking manager project. Normally there is no need to request review on OSM if you are mapping inside HOT TM. The mapping activities in HOT TM are usually validated there, so you would get feedback automatically if there was anything found wrong.
tomhukins (2025-12-08 12:55:04+00:00): Thank you for all your helpful work on OpenStreetMap.

I notice https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/680120554 is still tagged as "amenity=telephone" which seems unlikely given the other tags present.
Robert Whittaker (2025-12-08 16:36:03+00:00): Yes I agree, but it wasn't my change that added the AED while leaving the amenity=telephone in place.

I think there are some AEDs in still-in-use phone boxes, so I wouldn't recommend automatically re-tagging these as disused:amenity=telephone.

The "old phone box" in the defibrillator:location tag in this case is suggestive, but it would probably be better to check with the editor who added the AED. ("old" could mean "old-fashioned" rather than "disused".)

This isn't an isolated issue though, as you can see from the list that my AED tool produces at https://osm.mathmos.net/defib/osm-amenity.html
tomhukins (2025-12-08 16:46:27+00:00): Thank you for your insightful reply.

I have contacted the mapper at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131009801 and created a note for others to check.
chris66 (2025-12-16 16:23:19+00:00): Hi, ich denke ich muss diesen Änderungssatz revertieren, Du hast hier jede Menge Sachen eingetragen, die bereits eingetragen sind......
Mappertizer (2025-12-16 17:39:35+00:00): Ich habe nur neue Gegenstände eingetragen oder den Standort von existierenden korrigiert. Schau bitte mal genau hin. Ich habe nichts redundantes gefunden. Hab mir dafür echt viel Zeit und Mühe gemacht. Wäre sehr schade, wenn das einfach für die Katz war.
chris66 (2025-12-16 17:42:55+00:00): Ok, ich werde es vor Ort überprüfen :)
chris66 (2025-12-17 11:11:33+00:00): Hi, sorry, dass die Stadt LH da am Frater-Johannes-Göbbles-Weg noch neue Lampen montiert hat obwohl da schon welche waren, hatte ich gar nicht mitbekommen. Somit ist Dein Edit OK.

Habe noch den Lampen-Typ (LED) ergänzt.

Bei den neuen Laternen am Steverweg hatte ich noch die ref-Nummer ergänzt.

Bei den 3 Bänken am Cani habe ich noch picnic_table ergänzt, weil das Bänke mit Tischen sind. 

VG.
Chris
Mappertizer (2025-12-17 12:01:07+00:00): Nice, vielen Dank!
mcliquid (2025-12-07 06:50:55+00:00): What do you mean with man_made=yes?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12337840399
Sylabowy Kot (2025-12-07 10:07:08+00:00): Check the 1st version of this node - it's not his job. You can you a 'yes' value if you cannot define a right one.
Sylabowy Kot (2025-12-07 10:07:19+00:00): You can use*
mcliquid (2025-12-08 14:17:45+00:00): What is his job then? Perform automated edits without manual control that have not been agreed with the community and are therefore not permitted?
ilias_ (2025-12-08 20:13:40+00:00): I don't mind changing an *obvious* typo to the correct form. In this case manmade to man_made.
SomeoneElse (2025-12-12 17:40:03+00:00): Agreed - "manmade" is pretty obviously a typo for "man_made" here.
Where problems might occur with changes like this is where both "manmade" and "man_made" were set.  Here there were only 5 and only https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8322504104/history had them set to plausible different values (although there are only 30 https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/man_made=scoreboard , and the existence of a subtag suggests the other value).
市川ゆり子 (2025-12-14 00:14:27+00:00): Hi, Sorry for late reply... "Perform automated edits without manual control that have not been agreed". Ah~ I didn't do automated edit. I done this manually by JOSM with Overpass API...
InsertUser (2025-12-17 03:35:27+00:00): Replacing wrong tags with more wrong tagging is hardly an improvement. Map changes should be individually reviewed unless there has been previous discussion of the edit in line with the automated edits code of conduct. Transmuting nonsense into more nonsense helps no one. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/What%27s_the_problem_with_mechanical_edits%3F
bbqman (2025-12-06 17:44:05+00:00): also source: https://boringdonhall.co.uk/ and Wikipedia/Wikidata
gmar5 (2025-12-06 23:11:59+00:00): There's now a duplicate 42. Is the end-of-terrace 43?
extua (2025-12-07 20:49:09+00:00): Thanks for checking, I forgot to move the numbers. Number 42 is the end of terrace and 41 is the next one up.
extua (2025-12-07 20:50:00+00:00): ok having just walked around the corner I now see the problem
extua (2025-12-07 20:50:57+00:00): there is a door on canal street for number 43, and a door around the corner on cranham street for number 42, both on what looks like the same building
extua (2025-12-07 23:48:48+00:00): fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175643734
JakovBušić (2025-12-07 18:41:38+00:00): The node that was accidentally created was deleted in changeset 175635551 since it served no real purpose.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175635551
rempshaener (2025-12-06 19:09:34+00:00): Hallo,
hier passt fire_hydrant:type=underground nicht zu
water_source=water_tank
Wie ist die Entnahmestelle denn aufgebaut?
Viele Grüße
MB_UA (2025-12-06 21:20:45+00:00): Hallo,
ist ein unterirdischer Tank zur Wasserentnahme
Nehme das Hydrant raus
Gruß
rempshaener (2025-12-06 22:16:57+00:00): Hallo,
das ist ein bisschen tricky.
Ist es ein unterirdischer Tank mit offenem Schacht, d. h. die Entnahme geschieht mit Saugkorb, wäre es nur emergency=water_tank.
Ist der Anschluss fest verrohrt, wäre das emergency=fire_hydrant mit fire_hydrant:type=pipe.
Das emergency=suction_point passt nur bei Bächen und Seen.
Viele Grüße
MxxCon (2025-12-07 04:28:12+00:00): If you think that somebody needs to be fixed about a feature that you can't, rather than using note= tag, it's better to use fixme= tag.
If you'd like you can try using https://projets.pavie.info/yohours/ to generate opening_hours tag that matches this biz.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175596128
Frans S (2025-12-31 12:26:36+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
 * Buildings should be mapped without snapping their corners to other buildings and features such as roads and paths.
Keep that in mind on future mappings please.
Buraddo (2025-12-07 12:52:57+00:00): Hello,
Is the left turn into Coca Cola when coming from Becicherec not a legal maneuver anymore? Based on the newly drawn geometry, this turn doesn't seem to be accounted for. Also please avoid separating directions if there is no physical separation between them, this is a common rule of OSM.
AlexTopoRO (2025-12-08 06:16:46+00:00): Good morning. I forgot to add the entrance from becicherec, i will add it now. i separated direction until after the boom barriers because there are 2 distinct separated lanes there, but if you recommend it i will join them after the tiny patch of grass separating them at the curve
AlexTopoRO (2025-12-08 06:21:29+00:00): I made a new changeset, please review it and let me know if its alright now
Buraddo (2025-12-08 19:26:24+00:00): Thanks, it looks good, you can keep one way or do another separation at the entrance, however you like. 
Keep up the good work!
Nine-tailed (2025-12-17 17:57:45+00:00): А куда у вас уплыли дома по адресу Гаражный проезд 23 к1 и 23 к2?
NorthCrab_upload (2025-12-06 19:12:47+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/911467867
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1456531559

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Yog Sot (2025-12-06 20:02:22+00:00): uniemozliwiełes dojazd do posesji dla tego podjazdu 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1295841829
Zgodnie z prawem musi on być zapewniony
m@rio (2025-12-06 20:32:55+00:00): No, Yog Sot, Przyznam, że mnie to 'zgodnie z prawem..' nawet rozbawiło! :D
Ale wyjaśnij mi proszę, co spowodowało, że go uniemożliwiłem, bo nie zasnę..
Yog Sot (2025-12-06 21:31:41+00:00): ustaw pieszy lub rower w routingu, to się dowiesz dlaczego nie prowadzi. 
Przy czym uprzedzam, jak wiesz, zanim routery łykną twój changeset minie chwila, więc liczę, że potrafisz sobie wyobrazic efekt.
m@rio (2025-12-06 21:58:48+00:00): To uprzejme z Twojej strony, ale nie wiem czy potrafię sobie to wyobrazić.
Niemniej jestem przekonany, że podjazd ma się dobrze i niezmotoryzowani mieszkańcy tej posesji nie zostali pozbawieni swojego prawa.
Pozostając w kontakcie, pozdrawiam! :)
Yog Sot (2025-12-07 00:52:24+00:00): rozumiem iż wycofanie twoich zmian jest niezbędne byś to sobie wyobraził?
Bo serio liczyłem iż potrafisz zaadresować problem, ale jednak wolisz sciemniać?
m@rio (2025-12-07 12:43:59+00:00): kolego, niestety ale słabo rozumiesz..
Podejrzewam, że nie widziałeś tej drogi na oczy - dlatego rekomenduję ci w pierwszej kolejności pojechać i zobaczyć, a następnie (jeśli dalej bedziesz miał wątpliwości) skontaktować się z jej Zarządcą i tam przedstawić swoje zastrzeżenia.
Pozostając w kontakcie, pozdrawiam! :)
MxxCon (2025-12-07 04:30:30+00:00): Hello.
In this edit you moved a library node a few buildings over. Was that intentional?
Also it looks like you tagged what appears to be an apartment building as a single-family house. Could you please elaborate on this change?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175597018
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-12-07 10:46:10+00:00): Hi! Thanks for the update. However, why merge the dual carriageways at intersection? Is it standard? Can you point to the wiki explaining we should do that? It adds transitions where there are none.
Trevor_1 (2025-12-07 15:55:15+00:00): Sorry, I was just used to doing that. I can change it back
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-12-08 12:14:57+00:00): No problem, it is just that I feel in a T junction, we should keep the carriageway separated until the intersection.
Trevor_1 (2025-12-08 14:26:29+00:00): Ok I fixed it
Jarek 🚲 (2025-12-11 02:17:04+00:00): Hello, can you elaborate on what kind of sources, guidelines, or local knowledge you used to change the classification of this road?
Trevor_1 (2025-12-13 15:45:43+00:00): Hi, I changed it because to connects the end of a motorway to another motorway, and it has 3 lanes in each direction
Jarek 🚲 (2025-12-14 02:19:52+00:00): Hi,

Major Mac doesn't meet any of the usual criteria for primary roads in southern Ontario: it's not a provincial highway nor a former one, it's not clearly more important than surrounding grid roads, 3 lanes is already tagged as lanes=3. It is a regional road and most of these are tagged as secondary.

More importantly, I would encourage you to not change road classifications without discussion with the local community.

I have reverted this change in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175904538

I invite discussion on the forum at https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/ca/95
literan (2025-12-07 11:08:14+00:00): это не странный тег, а коррректный. level это номер этажа начиная с нулевого (программисты-англичане его придумали). Т.е. наш первый этаж это level=0, второй - level=1 и т.д.

верну
Calibrator (2025-12-07 11:33:57+00:00): Полностью согласен, я в курсе. Вот только я имел в виду другое, - зачем ставить level=0 для POI на 1 русском этаже в многоэтажном здании, если там нет других этажей с POI? Так получается, что почти всем магазинам на 1 русских этажах надо поставить level=0 ?
literan (2025-12-08 19:34:42+00:00): ну по идее да, я ставлю... в EveryDoor это поле заполняемо для любых магазинов). Лишним не будет

например, кто-то захочет выгрузить все кафе, что стоят точно на 1 этаже. А что означает отсутствие тега level? то что он на первом этаже, или то, что это неизвестно?
streckenkundler (2025-12-06 21:21:30+00:00): Hallo Thomas,

Ah... Feuerwehr... Immer gut! Das ist deine erste Bearbeitung... Darum hierzu speziell auch Tips und Links...

Schau dir mal folgendes an: 

http://www.openfiremap.de/?zoom=12&lat=51.93861&lon=13.95241&layers=B0000TF

https://www.osmhydrant.org/de/#zoom=13&lat=51.9373&lon=13.9171 

https://waldbrand-app.de/mapcomplete/waldbrand.html?z=15&lat=51.98061&lon=13.76563&tab=3#

Bei den letzteren beiden kannst du mit deinem hier verwendeten Account auch Bearbeiten. Die letztgenannte Seite ich irgendwie ein Produkt der hiesigen Landesforst Brandenburg an...

Vielen Dank und wenn du Fragen hast, immer her damit...

Grüße aus Lübben, von nebenan,

Sven
mappinglander (2026-01-08 15:20:24+00:00): Geri alındı: merdivenler mevcut
wolfy1339 (2026-02-12 16:51:30+00:00): Please do not change the road classifications without talking with the local community.

The consensus has been to keep it as-is.
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/route-du-president-kennedy-saint-georges-to-maine-usa-trunk-road-or-not/117398
map_improver_xyz (2025-12-06 19:20:50+00:00): Hello, my changes (work of more than an hour) from just before got lost. I assume they are in the previous version. How can I reverse this here?
AntSom (2025-12-15 17:31:29+00:00): Hello map_improver_xyz,

This was flagged in a Map Roulette that I am working on, but I saw that you had a question about reversing edits. I'll leave this as is since you are still actively working on this feature. 

You can revert the current version of this feature back into a previous version by visiting this website: https://revert.monicz.dev/

Here's a wiki page on this: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Osm-revert

All you'll need is the changeset ID. I believe this will revert every single feature and object that went into the changeset.

Have a great rest of your day,
AntSom
kadiwa (2025-12-06 22:45:45+00:00): Die Linie 105 wird eine andere Strecke fahren als der X35 vorher. Meine Quelle: Auf https://www.hamburg.de/verkehr/stau-und-baustellen/baustellen stand in einer Baustellenmeldung, dass die neue Linie 105 über die Papenreye fahren wird. In der Papenreye wurden auch schon drei Haltestellen (größtenteils) angelegt, da gibt es aber noch keine Haltestellenschilder.
businessesMan (2025-12-07 10:20:36+00:00): Hmm interessant ich habe auf jeden Fall einen Beitrag vom LSBG zur Papenreye gefunden: https://lsbg.hamburg.de/resource/blob/1054240/31cdd375e9bc3e6f9b7d2d3315745001/papenreye-bushaltestelle-hh-takt-abgestimmte-planung-bericht-data.pdf
Jedoch scheint das vorerst nicht genutzt zu werden, denn die Kommunikation von Hochbahn und hvv sieht anders aus. https://geofox.hvv.de/web/de/connections?execute=true&date=17.12.2025&time=18:39&start=Lufthansa-Basis%20(Haupteingang)&startCity=Hamburg&startType=STATION&destination=Brandstwiete&destinationCity=Hamburg&destinationType=STATION&timeIsDeparture=1&wayBy=train&desiredType=fasttrain%26extrafasttrain,longdistancebus:10000&toStartBy=FOOTPATH&toDestBy=FOOTPATH&forVisitors=0&useStationPosition=1&useBikeAndRide=0 hier einmal die Neueinrichtung 105 ausklappen. Zudem ein Bild vom Aushang an den Haltestellen imgur.com/a/XeQqRDg . Auf jeden Fall danke für den Hinweis, sollte man im Auge behalten. Ich schätze dass die Haltestellen Papenreye noch nicht freigegeben sind von irgendeiner Stelle, weshalb der Verlauf vorerst so ist. Man kann ja die X35 Relationen zur Sicherheit belassen.
kadiwa (2025-12-07 15:25:58+00:00): Danke für die Antwort. Das ist tatsächlich interessant. Ich hatte es noch gar nicht hinbekommen, die Linie 105 auf hvv.de zu finden, also auch danke für den Link.
bxl-forever (2025-12-06 19:49:27+00:00): Hello,

I saw you requested a review for this changeset.

The edit looks good.  But since you have traced on aerial imagery, I imagine that you aware that you did not draw the real outline of the building but only a probable outline, which will have to be fixed later.  It is all right here because the PICC basemap does not show the new buildings yet.  It’s a good idea to have the building anyway.

If you experience situations like this, I recommend filling the "fixme" tag on every such building. This field will raise an alert for other mappers; you can simply indicate that the building was traced on aerial imagery.

This would be useful, because we can easily filter all the "fixme" objects in any area, once the new version of PICC is released.  That will be much faster than looking at every single building to see which one does not match.

Hope this helps.
Jarek 🚲 (2025-12-14 02:21:20+00:00): I have reverted this change in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175904466 for same reasons as in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175597869

I invite discussion on the forum at https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/ca/95
rhhs (2025-12-07 08:09:34+00:00): Hi, is there still a shop there? Then it would be better not to delete the shop node, but to add a disused: prefix to it. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history
Cat2006 (2025-12-07 09:05:44+00:00): There is only an empty room left:

https://ibb.co/VcQDN2V5
rhhs (2025-12-07 09:21:41+00:00): OK, so it's a vacant shop now. I reverted the deletion and added a disused: prefix. In this way, the history of the node is preserved, if it opens again it's easily restored, and editors like StreetComplete will highlight it every now and then for resurvey to check if another shop has opened there.
literan (2025-12-07 11:07:15+00:00): для площадки для фитнеса корректный тег leisure=fitness_station
Calibrator (2025-12-07 11:22:08+00:00): Спасибо, учту! Перепутал с детскими тренажерами на игровой площадке. :)
Olga Lomako (2026-01-26 08:38:30+00:00): Updated road geometry according to Bing Maps Aerial #mapbox_missing_roads
Baloo Uriza (2025-12-08 15:03:45+00:00): Is this bicycle=no because of an actual rule or law?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175599411
Sylabowy Kot (2025-12-07 11:15:24+00:00): Czasami chyba lepiej dopisywać o jaki obiekt chodzi :/ I źródło, bo te geoportalowe usługi na pewno nie podpowiedzą większości informacji o przebudowie terenów kolejowych. Np. przy Armatniej ciężko mi było powiedzieć, czy teren nadal nie jest jakimś zapleczem. No i przez zbyt duży landuse=railway robią się takie bboxy.
syntex (2025-12-07 13:49:19+00:00): https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=175599486 - tutaj widać lepiej : ), a źródło to filmiki Awizonosza na YT. Generalnie budowa się skończyła więc już przy tej Armatniej lepiej reprezentuje teren po prostu landuse=railway. A resztki zaplecza budowy przy Tunelowej zostawiłem, bo faktycznie jeszcze kilka kontenerów tam stoi - ale minimum 1/2 terenu zaplecza została już zlikwidowana w tamtym miejscu.
JakovBušić (2025-12-08 12:03:02+00:00): Wrong hgv restriction was made. Fixed in changeset 175663626.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175663626
MxxCon (2025-12-07 04:34:42+00:00): Hello.
While your edit is not wrong, generally if a feature has a wikidata= tag then wikipedia= tag is unnecessary since it can be extracted from wikidata.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175600040
tomhukins (2025-12-07 18:39:30+00:00): These changes revert the work of Dimasik007 in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174904612

Did you consider contacting the mapper to understand why they believe construction has finished?

It can be quite disheartening for new mappers to discover their work has been reverted without discussion.
TomJeffs (2025-12-07 19:43:03+00:00): I don't think replacing the border of an area with a street that doesn't exist could be described as anything other than a mistake.  You'll notice I didn't replace the houses.
tomhukins (2025-12-08 08:44:45+00:00): Thank you for your quick reply.

New mappers often make mistakes.  I made many.

When you encounter such mistakes, it's helpful to leave a comment like this one to check what the mapper was trying to do and help them understand how to improve their contributions.
TomJeffs (2025-12-08 08:51:47+00:00): no problem, I added a residential area.  I find OSM's history function to be opaque and the thing I noticed was the road replacing the area's boundary, so I presumed it was a mistake.  And because the road network probably isn't adopted yet, left it as a construction area.

Truth is though, I use OSM to log active travel upgrades in the area, so am generally always editing, and if I sent a message I'd almost certainly forget about it (especially if the editor didn't reply)
tomhukins (2025-12-08 08:58:06+00:00): That makes sense.  Thank you for reminding me that we all have different mapping styles.

In case you don't know about it, HDYC is a useful tool for keeping track of discussions that haven't been replied to (amongst other things):
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=6397757&commented
pitscheplatsch (2025-12-07 07:46:46+00:00): Hallo, vielen Dank für den Beitrag. 

Hier in diesem Kartenbereich gibt es jetzt mehrere Einträge für Firmen. Sind dies alles Test-Einträge?

Deine Änderungen und Eintragungen sehen (weiterhin) irgendwie seltsam aus.

Grüße, Pascal
Sara1000 (2025-12-07 11:40:15+00:00): قمت بطلب حذفهم من البيانات
لان هذا المكان بالفعل لا يوجد فيه سوبر ماركت ولا يوجد مكتب  شركه  بهذا الإسم
هذا المكان بالفعل هو ملكيه خاصه عباره كول سنتر لإحدى الشركات الكبرى بجوار محطة وقود
انا بالفعل ارجو حذف اي مساهمه موجوده طلبت بحذفها 
وشكرا لمساعدتي في اصلاح الخريطه
Sara1000 (2025-12-07 11:40:16+00:00): قمت بطلب حذفهم من البيانات
لان هذا المكان بالفعل لا يوجد فيه سوبر ماركت ولا يوجد مكتب  شركه  بهذا الإسم
هذا المكان بالفعل هو ملكيه خاصه عباره كول سنتر لإحدى الشركات الكبرى بجوار محطة وقود
انا بالفعل ارجو حذف اي مساهمه موجوده طلبت بحذفها 
وشكرا لمساعدتي في اصلاح الخريطه