piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
GOwin (2026-05-04 11:21:29+00:00): Hi there, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! 🎉

We noticed you're working with some boundary data, and we wanted to reach out as a friendly heads-up. It looks like these boundaries might be coming from the Philippine Statistical Authority, and we want to make sure we're respecting their ownership and licensing,  getting the right permissions before bringing them into OSM. This is really important to us!

The good news is that we've got resources to help! If you'd like to learn more about how imports and licensing work in OpenStreetMap, we're happy to walk you through it. It's easier than you might think.

Here are a couple of great places to start:

    FAQ on PH data imports: https://openstreetmap.org/wiki/Philippines/FAQs\_for\_PH\_data
    Community support channels: https://osm.org/wiki/PH

Our local communities in the Philippines are super helpful and genuinely want to support users' initiatives —whether that's answering questions, discussing the best way to handle this data, or finding alternative sources that are already open for use.

Just so you know, imports that haven't been discussed with the community or come from unclear sources do tend to get removed down the line. We do this to keep OSM data free and available for everyone to use without restrictions. But don't worry—we can absolutely figure this out together!

Feel free to reach out with any questions. We're here to help. 😊
ilias_ (2026-05-02 17:39:19+00:00): Great work! Just a friendly advice: when you map a building, select it and press Q to square it. Do that for every building one by one so that they look nice and squared.
Fizzie-DWG (2026-05-04 23:22:06+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20236
Emm75 (2026-05-02 14:48:09+00:00): I made a mistake and don't know how to revert this changeset, which is mine.
iandees (2026-05-02 14:49:08+00:00): Hello! I noticed that nodes https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4302939820, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6873213208, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8733685341, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8806522556 were moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182120859, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
Emm75 (2026-05-02 14:52:23+00:00): My intention was only to remove a poi, a bakery that doesn't exist anymore. All other changes should be reverted (or please revert all changes). I have been denied the right to revert because I am new in this editor role.
iandees (2026-05-02 15:00:37+00:00): Which bakery doesn't exist? I'm happy to help.
iandees (2026-05-02 15:03:33+00:00): Ah, maybe Αrtissimo? You correctly removed it.

The problems I resolved were from trying to move the map around in a crowded area. Everything looks OK now. Happy mapping!
Emm75 (2026-05-02 15:16:58+00:00): Yes, it's Αrtissimo. Many thanks for your corrections.
iandees (2026-05-02 15:05:16+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4729511476 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182121687, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
eggie (2026-05-02 15:02:22+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Pawcio (2026-05-11 19:50:49+00:00): Hi, thanks for adding C-road numbers, but only signposted numbers should be rendered. Also having C doesn't make a road automatically tertiary. Most drivers avoid narrow country lanes. More guidance at: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Roads_in_the_United_Kingdom
Pawcio (2026-05-11 19:51:59+00:00): I mean: avoid narrow country lanes regardless of official classification.
Pawcio (2026-05-11 20:04:43+00:00): And increased traffic on narrow roads because wrong mapping on OSM increases number of accidents.
dpolovinkin (2026-05-04 07:36:38+00:00): hi, can you please write meaningful comments instead of meaningless "Байр" on all the changes you do - it's kinda required to do so on OSM - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

if there will be the same comments further - I'll report the profile to admins

thx! :)
DulguunK (2026-05-04 23:36:49+00:00): I'm sorry. I'll be more careful in the future.
Leo Slager (2026-05-03 13:44:23+00:00): En alle 8 andere routerelaties van de nachtbussen zijn weer gerepareerd.

Wees voorzichtig met het opknippen van wegen waar routerelaties over heen lopen !
Door het niet downloaden van de omgeving worden alle routerelaties beschadigd.
AndyB_66 (2026-05-03 08:28:34+00:00): Naucz się, proszę, mapować poprawnie ronda, bo to jest jakieś "qui pro quo": https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:junction%3Droundabout
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-15 11:00:46+00:00): Reverted adding SEO POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags, possibly sourced from Google Maps, in changeset 184131455

https://osm.org/changeset/184131455
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-02 16:24:41+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182123738
eggie (2026-05-02 15:32:00+00:00): Dag alda  Nog steeds een restaurant..?
Je tagt amenity=restaurant en tourism=hotel? 

MVG
eggie
aldarosm (2026-05-02 15:51:19+00:00): It's a hotel with a restaurant on the ground floor
eggie (2026-05-02 15:53:37+00:00): Oke.. clear.
aldarosm (2026-05-02 15:56:06+00:00): I can add a separate restaurant? Ty
eggie (2026-05-02 15:59:39+00:00): I think that is better indeed.
aldarosm (2026-05-02 16:10:13+00:00): I made a new change, ty
aldarosm (2026-05-02 16:13:07+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182124449
eggie (2026-05-02 16:13:33+00:00): Top!
czebureks (2026-05-05 12:30:07+00:00): Cześć, dzięki za korektę. A które budynki to Sokółka II?
OSMthechallenger (2026-05-03 10:59:58+00:00): Я понимаю, что это часть города Находка, но тогда это должен быть район с устоявшимся названием, не имеющий самостоятельности. Спасибо за уточнение.
silversurfer83 (2026-05-03 08:56:43+00:00): Moin :)

in der Signalgruppe gab es auch grad diese Frage. Das Wiki sagt dazu:

tourism=information information=board board_type=notice

Warum entfernst du das check_date=*?

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182122787
Lenkradfreek (2026-05-05 09:52:26+00:00): Das check_date habe ich anscheinend ausversehen gelöscht, sorry. Das kann gerne wieder hinzugefügt werden.

Im Wiki wird bei board_type=notice auch advertising=board als ähnlicher Tag genannt.

Meiner Meinung nach ist die Beudeutung dieser Tafel nicht besonders hoch für Tourismus. Ich denke beide Tags passen
silversurfer83 (2026-05-05 10:58:31+00:00): Danke für die Rückmeldung

Wir haben ein paar solcher Schlüssel-Wert-Paare, die sich mal gebildet haben und nun so in Nutzung sind. Dass nicht alles, wo tourism=* dran steht eine hohe Tourismusrelevanz hat stimmt, wird aber so erfasst.

Happy mapping
alpacaMaps (2026-07-28 01:10:26+00:00): This changeset adds one or more surveillance cameras in a spot that looks unlikely — the nodes sit well away from any road, which usually means the cameras aren't physically present on the ground.

If these cameras are real, please let us know so the map stays accurate. Otherwise, we'd kindly ask that you avoid adding cameras that aren't actually there, and that you remove any temporary or test nodes once you're done.

If this was simply a mistake, no problem at all — just clean up the nodes that don't correspond to a real-world camera, and leave a quick note here so we can help.

Note: Cameras used by rail roads can have similar appearance to that of Flock cameras, but are in fact used for rail infrastructure monitoring. I suspect this is one of those cases.

Thanks for helping keep OpenStreetMap accurate.

— alpacaMaps
Senihtu (2026-05-03 06:38:22+00:00): Hi!
Mit diesem Changeset hast Du den Kreisel bei Ried in Segmente zerlegt. Bus 44 hat dort nun Schwierigkeiten. Könntest Du den Kreisel weiter zerlegen und dann die ways aus den Routenrelationen nehmen, die der Bus nicht nimmt?
Gruß!
flex16 (2026-05-03 06:58:35+00:00): done
karr4s (2026-05-03 17:02:30+00:00): A la place de Vertsachet (également au 41) ?
windu2b (2026-05-03 17:07:15+00:00): Non : au RDC du barbier.
karr4s (2026-05-03 17:07:54+00:00): Oui donc à la place de Versachet :)
Je viens de trouver une publication LinkedIn avec une photo : c'est bien le même local. J'ai mis à jour tout ça. ;)
windu2b (2026-05-03 17:24:29+00:00): Ah OK, merci. 👍
(J’ignorais qu’il était là : je n’avais que l’info et les photos de l’événement)
StC (2026-05-02 16:53:15+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changeset a créé des problèmes sur un itinéraire pédestre qui passe par là (voir https://openstreetmap.org/relation/8404974#map=16/48.1668/3.2651). Habituellement je m'occupe des réparations, mais là l'itinéraire d'origine n'est plus reconnaissable et j'aurais besoin qu'un local s'en occupe.
RafaelSens (2026-05-02 17:09:56+00:00): Je vois mon erreur, je corrige.
RafaelSens (2026-05-02 17:15:32+00:00): Corrigé.

Le sentier n'existe plus (reconnaissance ce matin). J'ai déplacer l'itinéraire par une piste et route, qui reprend l'itinéraire au plus court.
Désolé pour l'erreur.
swinetown (2026-05-02 16:28:05+00:00): Relatify is being troublesome again so may have to do this later
NorthCrab_upload (2026-05-02 17:42:32+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Plac Targowy":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13787386275
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13787386276
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13787386279

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
JoeBristol (2026-07-24 16:24:31+00:00): Why have you used bicycle=no in this changeset? Bicycle=no is for legal prohibitions of cycling - it does not mean 'there aren't bike lanes'. There are no traffic regulation orders in the database prohibiting cycling on these ways.
Malcolm Maas (2026-07-24 22:59:32+00:00): Okay, my mistake. I guess the fact that it's allowed on a 60mph road with zero shoulder is just kind of insane. I can change it back when I get a chance
apm-wa (2026-05-02 21:52:05+00:00): This is a duplicate of a node I added several days ago.
NorthCrab_upload (2026-05-02 17:42:30+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Osiedle Zielone Ogrody":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13787385898
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13787385900
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13787425901

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
lottie1040 (2026-05-02 16:20:33+00:00): Sorry about lumping that change in Edinburgh with the ones in Kelso - I hadn't noticed the warning was from a different place
GiovanniPen (2026-05-02 16:23:02+00:00): Can you please comment your changeset before publishing?
TrickyFoxy (2026-05-02 22:00:52+00:00): 🤨 https://osm.org/node/13787383442
Nine-tailed (2026-05-02 22:45:52+00:00): Поправил
DD1GJ (2026-05-03 08:45:43+00:00): Revert.

Hallo Monika, willkommen bei OSM und danke für das Erkennen einer Unstimmigkeit. Bitte solche Privatwege, insbesondere wenn sie auf Luftbildern deutlich zu erkennen sind, micht löschen, sondern an die Gegebenheiten (z.B. access=private anpassen. Ich habe es bereits korrigiert.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Viele Grüße, Joachim
mavl (2026-06-07 06:02:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183764451, 183764460, 183764431, 183764453, 183764448, 183764459, 183764455 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20768].
eggie (2026-05-02 18:28:11+00:00): Hoi... Denk dat het wel klopt zo.
Volgens mij kunnen je notes dicht.

MVG
eggie
aldarosm (2026-05-02 18:32:19+00:00): Thank you eggie
Tomas09 (2026-05-02 17:18:35+00:00): TenneT toren*
bxl-forever (2026-05-02 21:40:48+00:00): Hello, and welcome to OSM.

Adding missing is nice.

But please make sure to use the correct background when tracing. Never trace buildings on aerial photos.

Please have a look at the documentation.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Belgium/Conventions/Buildings

Thanks.
NitroBarry (2026-05-03 14:53:40+00:00): alright Thanks fo the tip, fixed ;)
smilytruffle (2026-05-02 19:48:59+00:00): Hi! Its great to see your additions to the map in the Rockford area! One quick tip: on Vespucci you can square buildings after drawing them by hitting the three dot icon in the bottom right (with the way selected) and choosing the "square" option. This can just help to make your edits more accurate and cleaner. Happy mapping!
eggie (2026-05-02 18:11:12+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback Niet name gebruiken om de eigenschappen weer te geven.
Zie wiki
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
joost schouppe (2026-05-26 11:41:04+00:00): Hoi Jakka,
Ik denk dat je dit niet hebt toegepast:
The tag leisure=swimming_pool should only be used for the water area of the swimming pool. A facility containing one or more swimming pools (mainly focused on swimming as a sport) should be tagged:

    leisure=sports_centre + sport=swimming; or
    leisure=sports_hall + sport=swimming (single pool).

Ik pas het aan
eerib (2026-05-02 18:07:16+00:00): Revert CS#182128592

Reason: User has added several dozen fake trails in a mass vandalism attempt.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182129269
amosharper (2026-05-06 09:25:44+00:00): Hello - good work. Does this changeset effectively resolve map note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5273809 ?
amosharper (2026-05-06 09:39:14+00:00): (And to follow up, if you've surveyed -- is this still an active construction area?)
XLetsGoX (2026-05-06 11:55:56+00:00): Oh whoops yes it does resolve the note
And the construction has finished a few months ago, google maps satellite view has a more recent picture of how it looks but has yet to be updated again now that it’s finished
amosharper (2026-05-06 14:00:34+00:00): Nice! Obviously we can't use Google Maps as a data source (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Don%27t_copy_from_other_maps) but if you've got first-hand knowledge that construction is complete, I'll update the landuse of the area.
XLetsGoX (2026-05-06 14:23:11+00:00): Absolutely, I’ve been around in person recently, all evidence of construction was nowhere to be seen
superoci (2026-05-02 18:05:22+00:00): Added info from their site
eggie (2026-05-02 19:38:34+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
MapperrZPolski (2026-05-02 18:14:01+00:00): https://www.skyscrapercity.com/attachments/dji_0411-jpg.10447570/?auto=webp&fit=bounds&format=pjgp&height=1920&optimize=high&width=1920
bxl-forever (2026-05-03 17:03:08+00:00): Hello,

"ref=CO MARCHE" is not a valid ref code.

Did you mean "operator=Comarché"?
crushtheserpent (2026-05-14 07:45:34+00:00): Hi, the previous extent of motorway tagging on the Santa Monica Freeway matched the signage marking the beginning and ending of the 10 Freeway, in line with California road tagging guidelines. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/California/2022_Highway_Classification_Guidelines#Motorway Please revert your edits so they once again match the guidelines I linked to.
mcliquid (2026-05-03 18:31:54+00:00): Hallo ÖTK, du hast hier einige Tracks doppelt übereinander angelegt und dabei die Relationen unschön verteilt. Kannst du dir das nochmal anschauen?
Beispiel:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1507871305
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1507878417
BC168 (2026-05-03 23:02:52+00:00): Moin,
noexit=yes setzt man üblicherweise am Endpunkt eines Weges, wenn dieser sehr dicht an einem anderen Weg liegt, um anzuzeigen, dass es hier wirklich keine Verbindung gibt und das nicht nur ein Mapping-Fehler ist.

Mitten auf einer Wegkreuzung ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2372140458 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2359981663 ) macht das irgendwie keinen Sinn, denn die Wege *sind* ja verbunden, und es geht auch nicht daraus hervor, welcher der diversen Wege denn nun hier enden soll.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:noexit=yes
CAM-Gerlach (2026-05-26 02:40:00+00:00): Thanks for fixing the other issues. Seems the SEO spam description was missed here; removed in changeset 183183544

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183183544
NorthCrab_upload (2026-05-02 19:52:28+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1507880636

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
d_berger (2026-05-03 02:00:31+00:00): Hör auf an Routenrelationen herumzudoktern, wenn du die PTv2-Syntax nicht verstehst. Du kannst in irgendetwas beliebiges in 'role' erfassen, und das Löschen der spezifischen hierfür erstellten Baustellenrelationen ist blanker Vandalismus. Für Fragen wendest du dich ans Forum, aber einfach etwas kaputteditieren, was du nicht mal verstehst, geht nicht.

Revertiert mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182140038
Makeena (2026-05-03 20:19:39+00:00): Du bist hier der einzige, der Vandalismus betreibt. Das Löschen der Nachtlinien und das Reaktivieren diverser Features, die in der Realität für längere Zeit nicht existieren, sind eindeutig als solcher zu klassifizieren. Das Wiederherstellen der korrekten Realität mitnichten. Selbstverständlich kann ich die Rollen als disused festlegen und den entsprechenden Präfix benutzen wo zutreffend. Alle Mapper haben dies in der Vergangenheit akzeptiert und selbst die Google-KI pflichtet mir bei. Du bist der einzige, der ein Problem damit hat. Es gibt keine "Syntax", OSM ist keine Programmiersprache. Und wie Tagging auf OSM aussieht, verstehe ich offensichtlich besser als du, denn ich halte mich sowohl an das Wiki als auch an die Realität, du an beides nicht. Lerne erst mal, dich zu benehmen, bevor du hier weiter vandalisierst.
Makeena (2026-05-03 20:21:56+00:00): Als grosszügiges Entgegenkommen habe ich nun extra für dich eine zeitaufwändigere Version erstellt, die ohne die Verwendung von role=disused:* auskommt und trotzdem die Realität korrekt abbildet. Falls einzelne Tags oder Elemente nicht passen, dann kannst du diese punktuell ändern, aber ein Revert ist inakzeptabel. Dies ist der letzte Kompromiss, für jeden weiteren respektlosen Revert und jede weitere realitätsfremde Reaktivierung werde ich dich an die DWG melden.
Jordi MF (2026-05-03 11:34:21+00:00): Hola Azul,
Gàcies per millorar les dades d'OSM, però en aquest cas, tant el Cadastre, com l'ICGC, com les plaques de carrer denominen aquesta via com a Carrer de Sanç d'Aragó. No sé quina font és el "VISSIR", però només podem utilitzar fonts per a les quals tenim permís. Si estàs utilitzant fonts no vàlides, les dades podran ser revertides perquè podríem estar incomplint una llicència d'ús i OSM podria tenir problemes legals.
Corregeixo aquesta via.
Salutacions
Jordi MF (2026-05-03 11:56:09+00:00): He comprovat que el VISSIR és el visor de l'ICGC, pe tant, sí que tenim permís per a utilitzar les seues dades, però em sorprén que la teua edició, justament, no coincideixi amb la capa de l'ICGC.
Azul1800 (2026-05-03 12:24:34+00:00): Sí, correcte, és el visor del ICGC. No entenc perque no veus el carrer denominat així al seu visor, però a data d'avui m'apareix com Carrer de Sancho de Aragón. No sé quin nom té prioritat en aquest cas, si la placa, el ICGC o la convenció local, però crec que seria el ICGC. Mira-ho bé i fica el correcte, que n'entens més tu.
Jordi MF (2026-05-04 14:40:05+00:00): La veritat és que és estrany, això del visor de l'ICGC. Jo veig un nom i tu un altre...

Siga com siga, el més habitual és escriure el nom que apareix a la placa de carrer, a no ser que hi hagi faltes ortogràfiques, que s'han de corregir. Per això, en aquest cas, jo escriuria el que diu la placa de carrer: Carrer de Sanç d'Aragó. Gràcies de nou
Dawid2849 (2026-06-20 23:34:08+00:00): Cześć, wiesz może co się z tą Biedronką dzieje? Na Mapach Google niby sama aktualizowała godziny otwarcia 6 tygodni temu
Wally_PL (2026-06-21 05:48:43+00:00): Cześć. Z początkiem maja pojawiły się kartki na witrynie z informacją o likwidacji sklepu, 2 maja już był zamknięty. Nie za bardzo wiem, jak ma się sprawa obecnie, a póki co nie szykuje mi się wyjazd w te strony.
Wally_PL (2026-06-26 20:15:55+00:00): W Leżajsku również zwinęła się jedna Biedronka, ale nie wiem, czy jedno ma związek z drugim. W przypadku Hrebennego bardziej podejrzewam przeniesienie kadry pracowniczej do Narola.
lukabułka (2026-05-03 16:33:19+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
Jordi MF (2026-05-03 11:38:28+00:00): Per favor, no elimines etiquetes vàlides com les "name:etymology:wikidata=*". És una informació important en la base de dades.
Azul1800 (2026-05-03 12:17:18+00:00): No em deixava modificar el nom del carrer, estava bloquejat. Encara sóc novato en això.
HellMap (2026-05-03 10:08:39+00:00): Hello,

Is this area by any chance a living zone (dzīvojamā zona)? Or is the speed limit signed as signs or 20 zone?

Thanks
OpenStreetMapOlly (2026-05-03 10:50:03+00:00): Its a living zone.
Did i map something wrong. I am new to the openstreetmap editing.
HellMap (2026-05-03 12:22:10+00:00): No worries, I just wanted to clarify before I say one way or another, because there are multiple ways roads can be 20 kph (or it could have been an error too).

In any case, since this is a living zone in Latvia, then roads should be tagged as living streets, i.e. highway=living_street . Here is some more info https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lv:Latvian_tagging_guidelines#Maz%C4%81ki_ce%C4%BCi
Jordi MF (2026-05-03 11:47:06+00:00): Estàs segur que aquest carrer és la "Travessia de la Bassa" i no el "Carrer Pla de la Bassa"? La primera denominació no apareix al Cadastre ni a l'ICGC, però la segona sí que apareix al Cadastre. L'ICGC l'anomena "Carrer de la Bassa".
Azul1800 (2026-05-03 12:20:08+00:00): Al VISSIR 4 apareix com Travessia de la Bassa i clicant als edificis del voltant ho marca com a adreça més propera: Travessia de la Bassa, 5 i Travessia de la Bassa, 7.
AndyB_66 (2026-05-03 08:24:46+00:00): Dostosuj się, proszę, do zasad komentowania zestawów zmian: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
eggie (2026-05-03 07:48:05+00:00): Hoi,
Dit is wat het doet in in 3D
https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=51.9523317&lon=5.8768325&zoom=18
Gr eggie
Tomas09 (2026-05-03 12:10:27+00:00): f4map update ongeveer 1 keer per dag. Ik gebruik UrbanEye3D op JOSM om te editen en die update live tijdens je changeset (:
Ook rendert f4 soms veel anders dan UE3D. Zie https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=51.9631763&lon=5.9009343&zoom=19
eggie (2026-05-03 12:25:49+00:00): Het blijft leuk..
Jordi MF (2026-05-03 12:00:11+00:00): Justament, el VISSIR denomina aquest carrer com a "Carrer de Balmes".
Azul1800 (2026-05-03 12:16:10+00:00): Hola Jordi, aquí t'has confos. Al VISSIR 4, des de la web, fas zoom aquí i et surt Carrer del Mas de Lluna