piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
nyanpsyche (2025-10-23 20:40:52+00:00): Just found a map of Transmission lines on the Government of Canada OpenData site!

https://search.open.canada.ca/openmap/384d551b-dee1-4df8-8148-b3fcf865096a

Based off this data, it looks like the BC Hydro maps are missing some notable lines.
3ngineer (2026-01-19 05:46:19+00:00): Thanks for the response and link! Yes, I agree the BC Hydro Maps are not up to date.
LordGarySugar (2025-10-22 00:48:10+00:00): Hi, thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap! Unfortunately, I had to revert your three changesets because a lot of roads had been dragged into impossible shapes and were crossing each other. I've re-added your intended changes, marking the roads as opened and the street names/address. Would you be able to confirm that all the housenumbers currently displayed are actually wrong? It looks like they are the plot numbers used by the developer and not the final housenumbers? If they are innacurate I will remove them all. Your insight would be appreciated, thanks.
amosharper (2025-10-22 08:00:46+00:00): Just to confirm, the numbers originally added are as provided by the developer in documents (cited in the changeset(s)) where it wasn't entirely clear whether they'd translate to property numbers or not at the time I added them. If the indicated property is 7 Glenister Way, it would probably be best to remove the addr:housenumber tags for other properties on the site now, pending a survey or other permissible data being published.
rempshaener (2025-10-21 21:46:17+00:00): Am Beispiel https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13013005154:
Die Straße gibt es so nicht.
Bitte versuche, dich an bestehenden Strukturen zu orientieren.
vasony (2025-10-27 20:50:19+00:00): Hi and welcome to Openstreetmap,

If possible label the address on the building. If the building has two or more numbers, place the points on the entrance or inside the building.
I merged the address points into buildings.

Thx, Tamas
NittyGrittyInTheCity (2025-10-23 17:13:14+00:00): Correction: Source used was Esri World Imagery, Mapillary.
rempshaener (2025-10-21 21:42:12+00:00): Hallo,
bitte nicht contact:* verwenden.
Da man Hydranten nicht kontaktieren kann, ist das schlicht falsch.
Viele Grüße
philam48 (2025-11-10 22:42:44+00:00): The path on the west side of Hoddle Street is a shared path. Have changed back and messaged user.
porfiriopaiz (2025-10-21 22:16:36+00:00): ¡Excelente!

Y muchas gracias por sus contribuciones a OSM en Nicaragua.

Happy Mapping!
Porfirio
user_5359 (2025-10-22 06:50:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/374103899 more than 100 meters. Please check the correct position. If you need help, you are welcome!
Gregory Peony (2025-10-29 03:22:47+00:00): Hi, it looks like you applied an invalid layer tag here. Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer to better understand its use.
Gregory Peony (2025-10-29 03:59:40+00:00): When mapping building footprints consider that you are looking at the roofs which may have stains making it appear as thogh their shape is different.
BER319 (2025-10-22 15:36:30+00:00): Der Path und die Überwege für Fußgänger über die Autobahn sind immer noch vorhanden. Außerdem existiert die Messestrecke jetzt teilweise doppelt. Bitte schaue dir das noch einmal an.
Vielen Dank
Gregory Peony (2025-11-10 03:30:16+00:00): Hello, 

When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom out to obtain the orientation and shape, then zoom in so that you can accurately draw the footprint. Exclude shadows and yards when tracing the footprint. Keep in mind that you are looking at the [roofs of buildings](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape#Roof_shape), but mapping their footprints. Depending on how the scene is lit, pitched roofs may have light and dark sections that belong to one building. Generally pitched roofs overhang the walls of a building, so a footprint slightly smaller than the roof is accurate. You can scale selected features in ID with `shift+(-/+)`, or JOSM with `ctrl.+alt+Lclick & drag`.  Take care to make contributions that others can build upon.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173603257
Gregory Peony (2025-11-10 03:16:25+00:00): Hello, 

After tracing and tagging features which are likely square or round, please remember to square their corners `q`, or circularise them `o`, because it is almost impossible and time consuming to draw shapes so percisely manually. Buildings with metal or pitched roofs tend to have square corners; round buildings are identifiable by the distinctive cresent shaped shadow they cast.

Unless the building is clearly a different shape then it's best to assume that it should be rounded or its corners should be squared. In the ID Editor, you can `right click` for access to editing functions. 

Since roofs tend to overhang walls trace the initial shape slightly smaller to allow a buffer for any change in size which may occur. In JOSM use the [buildingstools plugin](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/BuildingsTools). In ID you must draw the shape accurately enough if you want every corner to be squared. This [video about squaring features in ID](https://youtu.be/Xs5wX592E1o) has more information and a demo.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-22 03:06:01+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2914178675
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10967487830
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1443817961
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/534562367

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-22 03:35:47+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2914178675
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10967487830
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1443817961
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/534562367

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-22 03:45:44+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2914178675
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10967487830
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1443817961
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/534562367

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
user_5359 (2025-10-22 08:31:11+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/4891917337. What is the mean of the tag namer1=R1? Is this the name of https://www.osm.org/way/497669116
user_5359 (2025-10-22 06:46:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM! What is the mean of the key ADA_acs? Please have alos look on other NY playgrounds like https://www.osm.org/way/1442581013
5m4u9 (2025-10-22 04:44:55+00:00): hmmm... hola, tengo muchas dudas respecto a este cambio... Barrio Moto Taxi suena muy irreal 🤔
Abrahan24 (2025-10-22 15:29:46+00:00): Hola , yo se que si pero pero ese es el verdadero nombre de ese barrio en la Actualidad es por ello que lo puse
5m4u9 (2025-10-22 16:48:18+00:00): Gracias por responder y por mejorar el lugar, buscando encontré info y cómo lo llama la alcaldía, todo junto "mototaxi"
Aliadil1994 (2025-10-22 03:26:16+00:00): Removed a duplicate place that already exists nearby.
        

    

    Nodes
    
      6
    
  



        5291435022, v3


        6419422885, v3

سارة صالون (7193151985), v2


        9081526117, v3


        9105765552, v2


        10750572808, v2

حزمة التغييرات XML
  ·
  osmChange XML

        173605182
      ·
    Aliadil1994
      ·
      
        173605234
          

20 m
50 ft
© OpenStreetMap contributors ♥ Make a Donation. Website and API terms
NeisBot (2025-10-22 01:39:23+00:00): Hi Aliadil1994, welcome and thanks for your contribution!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

Based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Adjusted node positions"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Aliadil1994 (2025-10-22 03:24:52+00:00): Deleted old points because these places have moved to another location and no longer exist here.        

    

    Nodes
    
      2
    
  


فرحان مول (6662063181), v3

المطعم الصيني (7086866487), v2

حزمة التغييرات XML
  ·
  osmChange XML

        173605209
      ·
    Aliadil1994
  

20 m
50 ft
© OpenStreetMap contributors ♥ Make a Donation. Website and API terms
Branko Kokanovic (2025-10-23 05:30:50+00:00): reverted and reported again
Branko Kokanovic (2025-10-23 05:31:03+00:00): reverted and reported again
b-jazz (2025-10-24 06:05:52+00:00): Thanks for creating these greens, but please make sure your greens don't intersect with other existing (or created) golf areas like fairways. If you need to fix someone else's work, please do so that it doesn't create an inconsistency (error) in the map. Thanks.
5m4u9 (2025-10-22 04:40:55+00:00): Gracias por actualizar los negocios, hay varios negocios que faltan añadir.

Un día de estos pasaré por ahí y mejorar el mapa... también quisiera añadir las oficinas del edificio, las secretarias, direcciones que se trasladaron... sería genial tener la info.
Comino (2025-10-22 08:03:51+00:00): Hi,

In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes".

Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag !
Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead.

For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Merchants#tagging-guidance
and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bitcoin

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
https://btcmap.org/tagger/6794624
DanhengOSM (2025-10-28 02:07:13+00:00): 很好的成果，太感谢了
user_5359 (2025-10-22 06:38:26+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/1935986742 more than 100 meters over streets and buildings. 
I moved the node back to the original position.
Taksine (2025-10-26 10:37:00+00:00): 为什么要在中国的土地上加英文？
5m4u9 (2025-10-22 04:49:23+00:00): Hola, bienvenid@ y gracias por querer actualizar el mapa!

Pero hiciste unos errores involuntarios :(... voy a restaurar a la versión anterior, no hay problema.

Por otro lado, el nombre de edificios debe ser un nombre representativo y no una descripción... algo como "Torre X o Edificio Primavera"...
Frans S (2025-10-23 13:40:55+00:00): Hello again.
Also, these mappings are very inaccurate.
Buildings need to be tagged as building=yes. Not building=house !
Best regards
NeisBot (2025-10-22 05:17:11+00:00): Hi vaniaarg, welcome and thanks for your contribution!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

Based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Added house with 3 levels, named R"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Tomas Straupis (2025-10-22 06:04:29+00:00): Hello. Change reverted, resulting geometry of ways is worse with no improvements.
Flamen_Sru (2025-10-22 10:49:23+00:00): Hi Tomas Straupis, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you
Flamen_Sru (2025-10-23 12:26:33+00:00): Hi Tomas Straupis, thank you for reaching out and thank you for making the corrections. I have reviewed the discussion on K-modeling (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:junction%3Droundabout#Connecting_ways_to_roadabouts) and this junction looks like it falls within that definition.
Tomas Straupis (2025-10-22 06:06:45+00:00): Change reverted. Quality of road geometry decreased with no improvements.
NumisK (2025-10-23 11:34:01+00:00): Hi Tomas Straupis, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you
NumisK (2025-10-23 12:20:56+00:00): Hi Tomas Straupis, thank you for reaching out. I have rewieved the discussion on K-modeling (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:junction%3Droundabout#Connecting_ways_to_roadabouts) and here it seems from the satellite imagery that drivers need to enter the lanes of the roundabout in order to continue towards the next section. So I think connecting the segments to the junction on different nodes would be an improvement in this specific case. Please let me know what you think. I will be happy to discuss and widen my understanding.
Tomas Straupis (2025-10-23 15:03:15+00:00): Hi. Congratulations in taking interest in GIS and routing stuff, but please do not exercise your hobby without discussing with local community. And therefore please do not play with the data in Lithuania. Thank you for your understanding.
Tomas Straupis (2025-10-22 06:07:47+00:00): Change reverted, because geometry quality was decreased with no other improvements made.
NumisK (2025-10-23 11:33:50+00:00): Hi Tomas Straupis, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you
NumisK (2025-10-23 12:19:30+00:00): Hi Tomas Straupis, thank you for reaching out and thank you for making the corrections. I have reviewed the discussion on K-modeling (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:junction%3Droundabout#Connecting_ways_to_roadabouts) and this junction looks like it falls within that definition.
Tomas Straupis (2025-10-22 06:08:51+00:00): Change reverted for the same reason as others: decreased quality of geometries.
Flamen_Sru (2025-10-23 11:29:15+00:00): Hi Tomas Straupis, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you
Flamen_Sru (2025-10-23 12:27:13+00:00): Hi Tomas Straupis, thank you for reaching out and thank you for making the corrections. I have reviewed the discussion on K-modeling (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:junction%3Droundabout#Connecting_ways_to_roadabouts) and this junction looks like it falls within that definition.
yelisey90 (2025-10-22 12:54:31+00:00): reverted, the official name of the street is Konstantine Gamsakhurdia Avenue, even though the houses are address by Merab Kostava Street, check https://maps.gov.ge/map/portal with სამისამართო მონაცემები layer on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173626565
eggie (2025-10-22 07:39:54+00:00): Dag Carla....   bollard=pollerinzinkbaar_paaltje is geen valide tag.
Wel bv =rising.
motor_vehicle=no beter niet op paaltjes taggen.
access=no is al default muv foot, bicycle, moped, mofa.
Dan geeft motor_vehicle=no problemen.
De wiki.. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Tag:barrier%3Dbollard

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-10-22 07:40:45+00:00): aangepast als bovenstaand
Tomas Straupis (2025-10-22 06:10:03+00:00): And this one also is decreasing geometry quality so was reverted.
Flamen_Sru (2025-10-23 11:28:17+00:00): Hi Tomas Straupis, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you
Flamen_Sru (2025-10-23 12:26:52+00:00): Hi Tomas Straupis, thank you for reaching out and thank you for making the corrections. I have reviewed the discussion on K-modeling (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:junction%3Droundabout#Connecting_ways_to_roadabouts) and this junction looks like it falls within that definition.
Udarian (2025-10-22 16:04:20+00:00): The project that this comes from seems to be conflicting with an existing osmus tasking manager project, https://tasks.openstreetmap.us/projects/876 . Please don’t do the tasks that overlap with the above osmus tasking manager project.
Gregory Peony (2025-10-29 03:11:27+00:00): Hi, it looks like you inappropriately added a layer tag here. Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer to better understand its use.
NeisRevert (2025-10-22 08:53:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173616182
where the changeset comment is: 
Remove vandalism
HantDX (2025-10-22 06:49:11+00:00): Вадасховішча Краснае ці Чырвонае?
Udarian (2025-10-22 15:58:55+00:00): The project that this comes from seems to be conflicting with an existing osmus tasking manager project, https://tasks.openstreetmap.us/projects/876 . Please don’t do the tasks that overlap with the above osmus tasking manager project.
PedestrianMapping_StealthMapper (2025-10-23 08:07:47+00:00): Thank you for the feedback! I’ll make sure to avoid editing in the Overlap areas. Appreciate the heads-up!
Frans S (2025-10-23 13:38:56+00:00): Hello. 
Very inaccurate mapped. 
Map more precise and square each rectangular building please.
Best regards
SomeoneElse2 (2025-10-25 12:24:22+00:00): Alas,
"Remove duplicated section of highway" looks like it introduced a gap in the Chiltern Way.  I fixed it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173753717 .
Best Regards,
Andy
DD1GJ (2025-10-22 07:34:02+00:00): Revert. Du hattest hier das highway-Tag entfernt.
Seta_J87 (2025-10-22 08:24:22+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis! Ich bin noch neu hier und hatte das versehentlich geändert.
Tomas Straupis (2025-10-22 07:10:24+00:00): Change reverted: this change has decreased geometry quality.
BR_pebble (2025-10-23 11:33:39+00:00): Hi Tomas Straupis, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you
BR_pebble (2025-10-23 12:22:38+00:00): Hi Tomas Straupis, thank you for reaching out. I have rewieved the discussion on K-modeling (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:junction%3Droundabout#Connecting_ways_to_roadabouts) and here it seems from the satellite imagery that drivers need to enter the lanes of the roundabout in order to continue towards the next section. So I think connecting the segments to the junction on different nodes would be an improvement in this specific case. Please let me know what you think. I will be happy to discuss and widen my understanding.
Tomas Straupis (2025-10-23 15:04:10+00:00): Hello. Data in Lithuania is reviewed by professionals, please do not edit it without discussing with local community.
aceman444 (2025-10-22 19:40:17+00:00): Hi, why is oneway tag wrong on roundabouts?
aceman444 (2025-10-22 19:59:27+00:00): Also, when you played at the "K-configuration" you forgot to reduce the number of lanes after the service road branched off. I fixed it with https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1444024728 . Pay more attention next time, or you will do much damage when fixing roads all over the world.
Nar_ach (2025-10-27 09:34:58+00:00): Hi aceman44, thank you for making the corrections on lane numbers. I will be more careful on lanes and lane-specific tagging in my future edits.
Regarding the oneway tag, it is not wrong, but redundant as documented in the OSM Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Droundabout#The_roundabout_itself), the direction of the traffic flow taken as the direction of the way.
habi (2025-10-22 06:42:30+00:00): "wieder" :)
mikini (2025-11-14 13:09:21+00:00): Hej Troels,

Kommentaren skulle vist have været "Added space..."?

Bemærk at der ikke er fuldstændig konsensus omkring hvorvidt der anvendes mellemrum eller ej i referencer til redningsnumre.

Jeg har også altid selv opfattet skiltene som havende mellemrum, men ved nærmere undersøgelse viser det sig at uagtet dette bliver der refereret til dem uden mellemrum i de officielle kilder både på [kortet på respektforvand.dk][1] og den officielle liste (som fås både som [WMS/WFS] [2] og [MS XLS][3]).

Derfor er der flere mappere der korrigerer og fjerner mellemrum i overensstemmelse med listen. Se f.eks [CS 62137505][4] og [CS 148671541][5].

Se også [Jørgen Elgaards valideringsværktøj missingObjectsDK][6] som kan [fremhæve uoverensstemmelser mellem listen og eksisterende/manglende access_points][7], hvorpå disse to "F 485" nu fremhæves som fejlende (rød) og den ene position for "F485" der eksisterer på listen lidt nord for den nordligste markeres som manglende (blå).
Der er i øvrigt mange steder hvor der fysisk står flere skilte med samme nummer (disse er markeret grønne), men på listen er der altid kun én registrering med én lokation (måske mødepunkt for udrykningskørsel, og øvrige skilte er for publikums opmærksomhed?).

Direkte import af listen er desværre ikke mulig da [datalicensen i så fald kræver at opdateringsdato fremgår på reproduktioner][8] hvilket selvsagt ikke kan garanteres med OSM-data under ODbL).

-- 
Hilsner,
Mikkel

[1]: https://respektforvand.dk/?filter=6#Find%20badested 
[2]: https://www.redningsnummer.dk/#korttjenester
[3]: https://www.redningsnummer.dk/#download
[4]: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62137505
[5]: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148671541
[6]: https://github.com/OSM-DK/missingObjectsDK
[7]: https://osm.elgaard.net/map.html?layers=missing_rescuenumbers;doubled_rescuenumbers;extra_rescuenumbers&pointColors=%2333f;%233f3;%23f33&titles=Mangler%20fra%20redningsnummer.dk;Dublerede%20redningsnumre;Forkerte%20redningsnumre&hideLayers=0;0;0;0&title=Manglende/forkerte%20redningsnummerskilte
[8]: https://www.redningsnummer.dk/#termsandconditions
Troels Arvin (2025-11-15 14:18:04+00:00): Korrekt, der skulle have stået "Added". Og i øvrigt må jeg nikke til alt, hvad du skriver. Noget tyder på, at vi burde skifte alle skilteregistreringerne til ikke at have mellemrum.
Yog Sot (2025-10-22 11:40:18+00:00): you'd likelly didn't notice, but since a state those ways are in, default access for a path allows not just pedestrians, but horses, bikes. Not everything by a side of a roadway is a sidewalk, so you should change it back.
CH GPS Tracker (2025-10-22 12:55:41+00:00): Tschou habi, 

das ist tatsächlich kein gedecktes Reservoir, sondern ein mit Schilf umwachsenes, künstliches offenes Gewässerbecken umrahmt von dichtem Baumbestand. Mittlerweile hat der Besitzer den Zugang mit Verbotschild unterbunden.
habi (2025-10-22 16:44:00+00:00): Mersi für die Klarstellung. In https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173637548 wieder auf das gesetzt, wie du's erfasst hast.
NeisBot (2025-10-22 07:00:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisBot (2025-10-22 07:00:44+00:00): Just to help illustrate what I mean, here is how your description could look in a more neutral, factual form: "Firma zajmująca się usługami dronowymi"
NeisReview (2025-10-26 10:16:41+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/173615529
eggie (2025-10-22 07:26:31+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback   Je kunt het beste zoiets opnieuw laten importeren zodra de BAG de verbouwing heeft verwerkt via het forum van OSM.. middels het draadje BAG importverzoeken.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
NeisBot (2025-10-22 07:15:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisBot (2025-10-22 07:15:42+00:00): Just to help illustrate what I mean, here is how your description could look in a more neutral, factual form: "Air conditioning contractor in Collin County Texas"
NeisReview (2025-10-26 10:15:36+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/173637880
eggie (2025-10-22 07:30:59+00:00): Dag Jaco,

Eigenlijk hoort er geen adres op een toegangsweg. Het huisnummer heb ik verwijderd.

MVG
eggie
Kovoschiz (2025-10-22 08:58:32+00:00): Please don't add online-only businsses (or fakes)