piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2025-11-04 10:39:16+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped.  Be more accurate please.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key . You hardly  squared buildings (75)
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174152923
bxl-forever (2025-11-03 16:27:27+00:00): ## REVERTED CHANGESET

See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174152653 for details.
Aya Samir (2025-11-04 07:41:01+00:00): Hi thaccio,
Thank you for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
I noticed that you've changed the classification of some streets to
tertiary_link
For example:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/88506033
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/701127191
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/88505982
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/701127190
I believe it might be better to revert to the previous classification,
as the current classification may not fully match its actual function. You can check that in the OSM wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=tertiary_link
Could you please review these changes and revert them?
Thank you again for your efforts and for helping to improve the map!
Best regards,
Aya
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:43:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321566 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Russia
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:25:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186320982 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Afghanistan
Self-Perfection (2025-11-09 23:17:22+00:00): Hi! I checked your latest changesets and it seems you always use "Orthophotos of mainland Portugal - 25 cm - 2018 (DGT)" imagery layer when performing your edits. Have you seen, that there is layer switcher in iD editor? And "Bing Maps Aerial" higher resolution and just about 2 years old - much more recent than "Orthophotos of mainland Portugal". I recommend you try it out. Mapping with such clear imagery is much more fun! And allows making more precise edits.
MRibz (2025-11-10 12:43:41+00:00): Dear Sir, I am grateful for your tip, in fact, I used the layer switcher so little in my edits that I forgot about it. From now on, I will pay more attention. Thank you for your kindness. Best regards.
topolusitania (2025-11-10 17:37:56+00:00): There is a 2023 portuguese layer also
HellMap (2025-11-03 19:26:52+00:00): OSM krāsas vajadzētu norādīt pēc to angliskām standarda vērtībām - yellow, green, blue. Citādi šīs vērtības datos nav gluži izparsējamas.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:colour

Es gan pieņemu, ka tie dzeltenie un zilie ir šķirošanas konteineri, kuri precīzāk būs nevis `amenity=waste_disposal` (kas ir vispārīgi atkritumi) bet `amenity=recycling` + `recycling_type=container`, kur var arī vēlāk norādīt, kas tur tiek šķirots.
trial (2025-12-03 20:55:26+00:00): Bonjour "Geroge", ce n'est pas plutôt "George" ?
trial (2025-12-03 22:41:45+00:00): I checked, it's: Georges
The full text:

1939 SNCF 1945
A la mémoire des cheminots
Tués par faits de guerre
- Felic Philippe : Cantonnnier Principal
- Roedras Louis : Facteur
Fusillés ou morts en déportation
Le Meur Félix : Manœuvre
Le Poder Georges : Facteur mixte

Yes, between 1939 and 1945 it's the old logo of the SNCF.

You can add as image:
https://patrimoine.lorient.bzh/fileadmin/patrimoine.lorient.bzh/Architecture/archi-commemo/noms_SNCF.jpg
g_turri (2025-12-04 20:05:29+00:00): Thanks!
I've updated the map accordingly.
trial (2025-12-04 22:40:20+00:00): Thanks, today I saw I forgot a typo and two accents.
Corrected text below
also to add: ref:FR:MemorialGenWeb=61714
So this will automatically link to https://https://www.memorialgenweb.org/memorial3/html/fr/resultcommune.php?idsource=61714
----
1939 SNCF 1945
À la mémoire des cheminots
Tués par faits de guerre
Felic Philippe : Cantonnier Principal
Roedras Louis : Facteur
Fusillés ou morts en déportation
Le Meur Félix : Manœuvre
Le Poder Georges : Facteur mixte
YomanNH (2025-11-06 09:51:50+00:00): Hej,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1447166440 i https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1447166443 to nie są rozległe place. Poprawiłem tagowanie na area:highway=*.
YomanNH (2025-11-06 09:53:39+00:00): Widzę, że w innych swoich edycjach też popełniłeś pełno takich błędów. Mógłbyś to poprawić?
SpinOff (2025-11-05 20:45:17+00:00): Hej. Do linkowania artykułów z wikipedi jest dedykowany tag: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:wikipedia

Edytor ID posiada wsparcie dla tego tagu i automatycznie dodaje też wikidata na podstawie linka
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-24 09:34:39+00:00): reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 received no answer in discussions

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175058035
tomhukins (2026-05-13 20:50:30+00:00): Thank you for fixing these mistakes that were introduced in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171889634.

That change introduced several other mistakes like this which I have fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182620552.
aTarom (2025-11-22 17:00:20+00:00): Entiendo que se trata de edición masiva a ciegas. Las salidas de las Rondas de BCN, no pueden tener su nombre?
kapazao (2025-11-23 10:15:15+00:00): Hola, no hago ediciones masivas a ciegas. Que pueda haber algún caso muy contado que haya tenido problema no quiere decir que se haya hecho sin pensar.

En este caso teniendo en cuenta la wiki sobre highway=motorway_junction, se explica claramente que en la mayoría de los casos en todo el mundo la información de la señal se describe en los destinos y no en el nombre.
Puede haber habido casos mínimos donde se vea que hay un nombre para las salidas, pero por lo general hacen referencia al destino y se ha hecho mal uso de ellos en numerosas ocasiones por culpa de querer mostrar en el render algo que no es correcto.
Se encontraron muchos casos donde se nombraban mal las salidas e incluso se inventaban los nombres para que tuvieran algo que se viera, cuando como comento esto va en la vía de salida en su etiqueta destination.

Por unificación a nivel estatal y evitar esos problemas a futuro se decidió suprimir y traspasar los datos necesarios a las vías en su etiquetado destination como se recomienda en la wiki. Aún se está trabajando en ello.

Si encuentras casos concretos donde creas que falta información o está incorrecta puedes contribuir a ello.

Espero haber solucionado la duda.

Un saludo
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:42:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321502 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Maldives
NeisBot (2025-11-03 16:16:49+00:00): Oi anapjodas, bem-vindo ao projeto OSM e obrigado pela sua contribuição!

Para tornar a colaboração mais fácil e ajudar os outros a entender as suas edições, é melhor adicionar uma breve descrição das alterações que fez. Comentários claros ajudam a comunidade a seguir o seu trabalho e fornecer feedback melhor. Você pode encontrar dicas para escrever bons comentários aqui[1].
(Auto-translation)
---
Hi anapjodas, welcome to the OSM projekt and thanks for your contribution!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish
NeisBot (2025-11-03 16:16:54+00:00): Aqui está um comentário de amostra com base nas suas edições do mapa: "Adicionada estação de tratamento de águas residuais com escritório da ONG, operado pela Sabesp"
(Auto-translation)
---
Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added wastewater plant with NGO office, operated by Sabesp"
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-24 09:34:16+00:00): reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 received no answer in discussions

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175058026
user_5359 (2025-11-05 08:14:33+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1447171433. What is the eman of the tag car_dealer	= used? I didn't see any shop=car nearby.
SaiKF (2025-11-05 10:54:00+00:00): Hello @user_5359 , thank you for your comment. This place is not the actual dealership, but an outdoor display area belonging to a used car dealer located in the town center. There is no building or sales activity here — only vehicles on display. The main dealership is already mapped as a node elsewhere. I wasn’t sure about the best tagging method for this kind of display area, so I used car_dealer=used based on a previous suggestion. Could you please advise what tagging would be most appropriate here?
Thank you!
user_5359 (2025-11-05 11:44:30+00:00): Hello! Unfortunately, the key display is already reserved for advertising (in the sense of display_area). 
You could still define it as shop=car with sales=no or mark it with the key showroom=yes/only (even if it is not an enclosed space).
NeisBot (2025-11-03 16:24:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisBot (2025-11-03 16:24:42+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "specialist in radiology"
NeisReview (2025-11-08 22:04:32+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/174396288
Farshad Achak (2025-11-09 17:05:10+00:00): Hi
Excuse me for my late reply!
I tried to shorten the description field, but in edit mode there is no "description" filed to be edited.
please help me with that.
Best Regards,
NeisReview (2025-11-09 17:11:23+00:00): Hello Farshad Achak,
thank you for your response.

As stated above, the previous description tag has been removed. Please add a new one.

Best regards,
Pascal
Farshad Achak (2025-11-09 17:24:22+00:00): Dear Pascal, 
As far as I understood only the description has been removed right?!
I was worried that the location itself has been removed :(
Is it ok not to add any describtion, because I am still struggling in finding its filed :)
Best Wishes, 
Farshad
NeisReview (2025-11-09 17:31:59+00:00): Farshad , your added location is still (t)here, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13277947320

All the best,
Pascal
nona mostafa (2025-11-04 10:54:44+00:00): Hi Younes_Agadir,
Thank you for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
I noticed that you've opened those segments of road:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1443475403,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1384538958,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1416708355,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1416708354,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1416708357.
But my latest imagery (dated 21/10/2025) shows that this location is still under construction.
If you have more recent sources, could you please share them with me? If not, please revert this location as is.
Best regards,
nona mostafa
Youness_ss (2025-11-04 11:23:08+00:00): Hi, how are you?
This highway was opened yesterday in 3/11/2025
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.7news.ma/%25D8%25A7%25D9%2584%25D8%25B7%25D8%25B1%25D9%2582-%25D8%25A7%25D9%2584%25D8%25B3%25D9%258A%25D8%25A7%25D8%25B1%25D8%25A9-%25D8%25A8%25D8%25A7%25D9%2584%25D9%2585%25D8%25BA%25D8%25B1%25D8%25A8-%25D8%25AA%25D9%2581%25D8%25AA%25D8%25AD-%25D9%2585%25D9%2586%25D8%25B4%25D8%25A3%25D8%25AA%25D9%258A%25D9%2586-%25D8%25AC%25D8%25AF/amp/
nona mostafa (2025-11-04 12:31:13+00:00): Thank you for the quick response.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-11-08 22:16:13+00:00): This changeset removed the highway tag from the motorway https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1290355202/history/3
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174156024
Reitstoen (2025-11-04 10:36:52+00:00): "Roads and footways should connect to each other within the parking area. A common mistake is to connect roads and footways only to the edge of the amenity=parking area"

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=parking
Håvard Wigtil (2025-11-04 10:50:40+00:00): I’ll fix it!
Reitstoen (2025-11-05 09:08:48+00:00): bra :)
totera (2025-11-04 15:16:26+00:00): Oltre ai problemi di modifiche automatiche (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct) e dimensione del changeset (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets) avresti "corretto" sulla base di che?
I prefissi sono ormai da molti anni la modalità preferita per rappresentare il ciclo di vita degli oggetti (railway=disused è tollerato per ragioni storiche ma va comunque accompagnato da disused:railway=*).
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:43:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321576 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Saudi Arabia
CoryS89 (2026-04-30 13:54:42+00:00): Those are service roads. Residential roads have people living there, not gas station and convenience store access. I'll change them back but please read definitions of roads before changing. Looking back at your edits, you have made many errors and other users have been having the same issues with your edits.
Szymson (2025-11-17 19:26:43+00:00): Flow Dental Studio to na pewno szpital?
czebureks (2025-11-19 01:46:07+00:00): Raczej nie. Poprawiłem
NorthCrab_upload (2025-11-03 18:04:53+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"księdza kanonika Jana Hryniewicza":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13278107751
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13278107752
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13278107761

"Kusocińskiego":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13278107770
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13278107771
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13278107772
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13278107773
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13278107774
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13278107775
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13278107776
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13278107777
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13278107778
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13278107779

"Generała Stefana Roweckiego Grota":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13278107833
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13278107834

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
felipeeugenio (2025-11-07 10:58:37+00:00): Hola, =concrete plates: es definitivamente una cosa que no hay en Chile. Por favor usar =concrete.

Saludos
mavl (2025-11-04 07:28:23+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок добавляет на отношение и на его внешний контур один и тот же тег (landuse=farmland). Это старый стиль оформления мультиполигонов. Сейчас тег ставят только на само отношение, поэтому различные валидаторы будут указывать на ошибку.  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1447192717
Danil Moiseenko (2025-11-04 08:01:16+00:00): Здравствуйте.
Я понял, уже исправлено: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174179428
mavl (2025-11-04 12:36:24+00:00): Спасибо.
ilias_ (2025-11-03 18:10:06+00:00): Please, at least remove the building=yes tag. It's like one huge building now.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-11-04 11:32:11+00:00): Thanks for adding this. However, shouldn't it be better to just put hgv=destination?
elsy1 (2025-11-03 18:30:04+00:00): stop it right now vandalism or
 report it now
elsy1 (2025-11-03 18:30:55+00:00): I will revert all of yor vandal edits. stop it or you get ban
paulbrunner (2025-11-29 17:19:24+00:00): Hi euvanet,
thanks for your contributions to OSM!
In this changeset, you deleted some smoothness values (for example at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/378932928 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/301906082) and changed the value for "surface" from "compacted" to the less precise "unpaved".

The wiki at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:surface says about "unpaved": "This value gives only a rough description; use a more precise value if possible."

Could you give some background about your changes? At first sight it looks like we should be reverting the changes and going back to the previous version, but I wanted to ask you first. (Also as I see we're both working on the cycling routes in this area this week. :)  )

Thanks again for contributing and happy mapping!
Paul
paulbrunner (2025-11-29 17:27:15+00:00): Ah, one more question:
At https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/301906082, you added "access=no". That means it impossible for many routers to make a route here now.

Is there construction going on and that's why public access is now forbidden? (If yes, we should tag it as construction.) I was wondering if they would extend the bike route which is paved further south (for example at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/140952383) and also pave the northern part.

Some more info would be appreciated, thanks!

All the best,
Paul
euvanet (2025-11-29 18:54:43+00:00): Hi Paul,
concerning osm.org/way/378932928 I changed again the value for "surface" from "unpaved" to "compacted", because in those parts the double track is made of compacted earth.

At osm.org/way/301906082 the double track surface has a natural surface ( basically medium size stones), so in my opinion "compacted" is not correct, now I set it to "ground". Anyway feel to revert my changes, if you think this would be better. Absolutely no problem.

At osm.org/way/301906082 I set "access=no" by mistake, sorry. Now reverted it to "yes". 

If you notice other changes I did to be fixed, please feel free to write me again.

Best regards,
Eugenio
felipeeugenio (2025-11-03 20:04:06+00:00): another address deleted
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174161415
lyctkel (2025-12-13 17:33:53+00:00): Hi kiritimati_c7g,
at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/122082494 you mapped
  lit=yesbicycle=no
I suppose you meant 
  lit=yes
  bicycle=no
Kind regards,
lyctkel
kiritimati_c7g (2025-12-14 04:08:06+00:00): fixed
elsy1 (2025-11-03 18:42:04+00:00): reverted all vandal edits and report it.

revert vandalism aymanaz
174161325, 174161111, 174157121, 174156037, 174155609, 174155582, 174155411, 174155116, 174125409, 174125348, 174125127, 174125111, 174125067, 174125031, 174124984, 174124882, 174124842, 174124797, 174124694, 174124519, 174124360, 174124289, 174124235, 174124149, 174123767, 174161536
elsy1 (2025-11-03 18:44:51+00:00): not reverted now,
elsy1 (2025-11-03 18:47:28+00:00): so what? you get all reverted and next ban
rising-mistake (2025-11-19 10:15:47+00:00): Nice one, thanks for adding to this - I've had quite some fun trying to research the boundaries are for different suburbs of Oxford. Obviously it's somewhat blurry but I like these definitions personally.
elsy1 (2025-11-03 18:54:57+00:00): reverted all vandal edits.
✅ https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174162153

174161986, 174161830, 174161733, 174161325, 174161111, 174157121, 174156037, 174155609, 174155582, 174155411, 174155116, 174125409, 174125348, 174125127, 174125111, 174125067, 174125031, 174124984, 174124882, 174124842, 174124797, 174124694, 174124519, 174124360, 174124289, 174124235, 174124149, 174123767, 174161536
qstep (2025-11-03 18:56:16+00:00): URL javítva itt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12258308546
elsy1 (2025-11-03 18:58:30+00:00): reverted
Fizzie-DWG (2025-11-04 04:39:46+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18920
sykul (2025-11-04 07:56:49+00:00): Hello. Could you limit the size of the changeset please? By the way, is the actual name of this specific beehive 'Ruches' or is that just a translation into French?
Gékom (2025-11-04 08:39:34+00:00): Hello, What do you mean by "size of the changeset" ?
"Ruches" is indeed a French translation but this allows to specify that there are several of them.
sykul (2025-11-04 09:22:20+00:00): It means you made edits in both Japan and France, which means that all users in between those coutries looking at the history tab see a massive orange box covering everything.
Name should be reserved for the actual name of a place, not translations or anything else. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Names#Les_noms_ne_sont_pas_des_descriptions 
Multiple beehives in one location is called an apiary and there's a landuse tag which is better for that. It even allows you to specify the number of hives (capacity=)  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:landuse%3Dapiary
Gékom (2025-11-04 09:44:03+00:00): OK, i've updated my contribution.
Thanks for your advices.
dieterdreist (2025-11-07 18:30:04+00:00): Ciao, credo si dovrebbe rimettere "building" alla parte costruita delle mura, nei sensi di OpenStreetMap è un "building" (si può entrare, etc.).
felipeeugenio (2025-11-03 19:48:49+00:00): Hello. please provide information of why are you deleting these POIS. They dont exist enymore?
You have a lot of editions deleting things.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174163017
Erlen Dur (2025-11-03 20:06:56+00:00): Hi Felipe, 

I am currently in this small village and I want to update POI, businesses and so on. When I am riding through the street with my bike and I see, that what is in OSM is not there in reality, I delete it. I carefully look for any sign or whatever, which could indicate, that there is still something. Just when there is absolutely no sign of any business, a phone number or something, then I delete it. I just can´t stand there each time for minutes and minutes and write a full description and summery, why I do this, why I add this and so on. 
It is my hobby to update places I live or I go.
felipeeugenio (2025-11-03 20:16:00+00:00): ok, If the pois do not exist, then delete them.
There is totally no problem with that.
But since you are deleting pois a lot, I was questioning if it was just a mistake.

Please do care about the information that still exists. like the address.

regards
felipeeugenio (2025-11-03 19:47:17+00:00): Hello. If the POI doesn´t exist, the address is still there, so please don´t delete all the information.

regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174163050
Erlen Dur (2025-11-03 20:08:41+00:00): Hm, what do you mean? If I delete a POI in Osmand, how can I "just" delete the POI but not the address. Those are usually two different things, or no?
felipeeugenio (2025-11-03 20:13:59+00:00): There is no problem in deleting something that doesn´t exist. You are welcome to do it. But there is some info, like the address, that is just there regardless of the poi.

I just reversed the changeset. recover the address, and deleted what doesn´t exist.