piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
kingkingHK (2026-03-11 03:42:50+00:00): What did you leave a millimeter gap between all the buildings?
kingkingHK (2026-03-13 02:51:59+00:00): Reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179704803 , manual review and repair will be done later if needed.
kingkingHK (2026-03-11 03:27:16+00:00): This is obviously wrong. Fix the geometry, and add `tunnel=building_passage` where needed.
kingkingHK (2026-03-13 02:47:15+00:00): Reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179704803 , manual review and repair will be done later if needed.
kingkingHK (2026-03-11 03:28:11+00:00): Obviously wrong; not underground. Split and use `tunnel=building_passage` or `layer=1` on the building.
kingkingHK (2026-03-13 02:47:33+00:00): Reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179704803 , manual review and repair will be done later if needed.
Kovoschiz (2026-03-10 18:52:14+00:00): Again deleting without even trying to change them to `building:part=`
Taya_S (2026-03-11 08:21:15+00:00): Please do not use the live server for testing. We have https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/ for that purpose.
kingkingHK (2026-03-11 03:29:25+00:00): Obviously wrong; split and use `tunnel=building_passage` (there's a correct one right next to this)
kingkingHK (2026-03-13 02:47:48+00:00): Reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179704803 , manual review and repair will be done later if needed.
kingkingHK (2026-03-11 03:44:22+00:00): What buildings issue did you fix?
kingkingHK (2026-03-13 02:52:14+00:00): Reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179704803 , manual review and repair will be done later if needed.
Kovoschiz (2026-03-10 18:49:59+00:00): Why are you deleting `building:part=` ?
IvaKraljić (2026-03-10 17:16:41+00:00): Removing an additional part of the tag on the road has since been done in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179650115#map=19/41.736542/-71.429960. #OptimoRoute
kingkingHK (2026-03-11 03:48:13+00:00): It's obviously simply a case of one incorrect node. Fix it, and not detach connected buildings.
kingkingHK (2026-03-13 02:52:31+00:00): Reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179704803 , manual review and repair will be done later if needed.
_zalle_ (2026-04-08 15:26:28+00:00): Hallo pamumann!

Schön, dass du dich in OSM beteiligst und Karteninformationen beiträgst!
Das Projekt (das ich sehr interessant finde und erst durch deinen Beitrag kennengelernt habe) war allerdings gleich zweifach falsch erfasst:

Den ersten Fehler habe ich durch CS #181055726 behoben, nämlich dass das Projekt nicht als Fläche Radrennbahn sondern als Rad-/Fußweg sowie Treppe erfasst werden sollte.

Den zweiten Fehler habe ich erstmal nicht behoben: In OSM wird generell nur erfasst, was IST (und nicht was WAR, also keine historischen Informationen, und nicht was SEIN WIRD, also Planungen und Ideen. Deswegen werden Bauvorhaben eigentlich erst aufgenommen, wenn sie on the ground (bei OSMlern als OTG abgekürzt) sichtbar sind, sprich: Wenn der Bau begonnen hat. Beim konkreten Projekt Fleiweg ist das ja noch gar nicht der Fall, wenn ich es richtig sehe, ist das politisch noch nichtmal beschlossen. Insofern wäre vermutlich richtig, den Eintrag komplett wieder zu löschen.
Kovoschiz (2026-03-10 18:48:18+00:00): There's nothing wrong here. Only not fully shared 1 vertex with `=park`
Kovoschiz (2026-03-10 18:45:56+00:00): Please connect buildings attached together, not move them minusculely away. I have noted `apartments=terraced`
kingkingHK (2026-03-11 03:31:07+00:00): Obviously wrong; split and use `tunnel=building_passage`.
kingkingHK (2026-03-13 02:48:06+00:00): Reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179704803 , manual review and repair will be done later if needed.
Kovoschiz (2026-03-10 18:40:20+00:00): What are you trying to do here? Much deleting, and changed Hong Tin House shape by attaching vertex.
kingkingHK (2026-03-11 03:31:35+00:00): Split and tag, please.
kingkingHK (2026-03-13 02:48:21+00:00): Reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179704803 , manual review and repair will be done later if needed.
kingkingHK (2026-03-11 03:49:23+00:00): It's obviously the road geometry that is wrong, not the building. Did you even look at aerial imagery?
kingkingHK (2026-03-13 03:03:34+00:00): Reverted for now, will manually review and and repair later if needed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179783626
Kovoschiz (2026-03-10 18:37:03+00:00): They are attached together in reality, and actually further overlaps vertically. There's nothing wrong with this in terms of standard OSM data layout either.
kingkingHK (2026-03-11 03:32:52+00:00): It's obviously ON TOP of the podium. You can see this on aerial imagery.
kingkingHK (2026-03-13 02:48:38+00:00): Reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179704803 , manual review and repair will be done later if needed.
kingkingHK (2026-03-11 03:34:11+00:00): Please correct the geometry, not adding fictitious tags.
kingkingHK (2026-03-13 02:48:53+00:00): Reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179704803 , manual review and repair will be done later if needed.
kingkingHK (2026-03-11 03:50:50+00:00): What building issue did you fix, and why did you delete a building?
kingkingHK (2026-03-12 12:36:23+00:00): Reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179755086 , manual review and repair will be done later if needed.
kingkingHK (2026-03-11 03:52:52+00:00): They are connected.
kingkingHK (2026-03-11 03:35:20+00:00): It's obviously a tower-on-podium, not a podium-on-tower. You could have seen this on aerial imagery. And you have the audacity to tag `source=aerial imagery`?
kingkingHK (2026-03-13 02:49:27+00:00): Reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179704803 , manual review and repair will be done later if needed.
kingkingHK (2026-03-11 03:35:45+00:00): Please split the ways.
kingkingHK (2026-03-13 02:50:03+00:00): Reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179704803 , manual review and repair will be done later if needed.
kingkingHK (2026-03-11 03:38:06+00:00): It's obviously the road geometry that is wrong, not the building.
kingkingHK (2026-03-13 02:50:18+00:00): Reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179704803 , manual review and repair will be done later if needed.
kingkingHK (2026-03-11 03:39:11+00:00): Are they not connected?
kingkingHK (2026-03-13 02:50:41+00:00): Reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179704803 , manual review and repair will be done later if needed.
mgerken (2026-03-10 21:38:25+00:00): Moin,
warum wurden hier die fixme tags für die Fertigstellung und Lage des Weges entfernt, wenn dieser offensichtlich noch nicht fertig ist? Es fehlen ja zumindest noch die Lampenköpfe und wahrscheinlich auch noch die Beschilderungen und Markierungen.

Durch die Wegführung wird ja auch https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1480035022 nur ein reiner Radweg sein und der Fußweg am Spielplatz entlanglaufen.

Beste Grüße
kingkingHK (2026-03-11 03:39:35+00:00): What are you even trying to do?
kingkingHK (2026-03-13 02:50:58+00:00): Reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179704803 , manual review and repair will be done later if needed.
Kovoschiz (2026-03-10 18:22:02+00:00): Please don't delete valid data. This is the common form of architecture in HK.
Kovoschiz (2026-03-10 18:23:28+00:00): You don't even choose to change to `building:part=` for the `name=` (`building=` is used as they are recognized as different buildings, and each tower can have its `building:part=` which can't be grouped together in between )
kingkingHK (2026-03-11 03:40:49+00:00): What building issue did you fix? You dragged a building to the wrong place.
kingkingHK (2026-03-13 02:51:49+00:00): Reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179704803 , manual review and repair will be done later if needed.
Harel M (2026-05-18 10:07:33+00:00): Hi Yoav and thanks for contributing to OSM!
Please note that you are adding tourist attractions for things that are not really tourist attraction.
I would recommend recommend reading more here about our local mapping rules:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Israel
I would also advise to read the thread about public shelters as I saw you added a bunch of those:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/how-to-map-public-shelters/52966

Please let me know if you plan to address the comments or if you need help in understanding how to map things in OSM.
Mariel@of (2026-03-13 21:45:19+00:00): bonsoir moi c'est l'ingenieur Okala francois mariel 
je suis vos travaux de cartographie sur openstreetmap j'aimerais savoir l'interet de la zone delimité en orange 
vous pouvez me joindre sur mon Mail francoisokala18@gmail.com
Arnold Nkwabong (2026-07-29 17:20:13+00:00): Bonsoir
Désolé de voir le message un peu tard
Je vous "cris de suite
kingkingHK (2026-03-11 03:55:25+00:00): Why did you delete two buildings?
kingkingHK (2026-03-12 12:36:44+00:00): Reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179755086 , manual review and repair will be done later if needed.
IvaKraljić (2026-03-10 16:07:23+00:00): The unnecessarily created node has since been deleted in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179644421. #OptimoRoute
bxl-forever (2026-03-10 15:14:54+00:00): SVP ne pas toucher aux points d'adresses.

Pour ajouter des commerces : créez un point séparé à l’intérieur du bâtiment.

Je vais corriger vos éditions.
felipeeugenio (2026-03-16 14:56:07+00:00): Hola. LA entrada ya estaba, agregaste otros stop position duplicándo los que ya estaban.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179644644
felipeeugenio (2026-03-16 14:57:44+00:00): Estimado. Editar este tipo de cosas es muy complejo. Como le indicamos en el mail de Bienvenida, puede unirse al chat de la comunidad para discutir cómo hacer este tipo de cosas, varios maperos le ayudarán
Si tiene problemas con algo que falta, por favor dejar una nota. Quizás eso es más fácil en esta etapa.

gracias
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179644644
Dodko (2026-03-13 09:40:31+00:00): Nie sú tam pomenované ulice v adrese sa nemá vyplniť addr:street
Povoda Stanislav (2026-03-13 19:28:32+00:00): Je to mestská časť bez pomenovaných ulíc. Cesta k domom je súkromnou cestou. mestská časť má názov Orlové a stavby v tejto štvrti mesta Považská Bystrica sa odlišujú iba číslom.
limes11 (2026-03-10 22:23:32+00:00): Hallo, 

du hast hier eingetragen, dass die Öffnungszeiten nicht beschildert sind.

Gibt es vor Ort überhaupt einen Hinweis auf diese Computerhilfe ? Ist das beschildert ?

Viele Grüße
Michael_Funk (2026-03-11 09:58:29+00:00): Hallo,
ja den Ort gibt es und auch ein Hinweis auf die Computerhilfe. Aber leider kein Schild für Öffnungszeiten.

Viele Grüße
limes11 (2026-03-11 13:13:15+00:00): Danke!
eggie (2026-03-10 16:16:13+00:00): Dag Stengelmens.
Beter gewoon access=private taggen.

Mvg
eggie
chris66 (2026-03-13 14:09:18+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/171243174

Ist das Museum wirklich gleichzeitig ein Tonstudio?
geomaniX (2026-03-22 08:02:27+00:00): Ich habe ein wenig recherchiert: Da ist wohl auch das "Medienforum Münster" drin
https://www.muenster.org/medienforum/kontakt/impressum

Macht wahrscheinlich Sinn, das in einen eigenen Node zu packen.
eggie (2026-03-10 16:19:48+00:00): Dag Stengelman,
Probeer eenduidig te taggen.
Dat kan door name=... en alt_name= te gebruiken.

Dus de namen uit elkaar halen.
Mvg,
eggie
kubahahaha (2026-03-12 20:36:36+00:00): A skąd pomysł, że tu powinna być wyższa kategoria?
Edawyt3425 (2026-03-13 01:10:38+00:00): To jest droga wojewódzka.

https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Droga_wojew%C3%B3dzka_nr_539
Edawyt3425 (2026-03-13 01:15:31+00:00): Cześć! Moja edycja wynika z faktu, że jest to droga wojewódzka (DW). Zgodnie z wytycznymi na wiki OSM dla Polski, drogi wojewódzkie są standardowo klasyfikowane jako highway=secondary (drogi drugorzędne), natomiast drogi powiatowe jako highway=tertiary (trzeciorzędne). Czy są jakieś konkretne powody funkcjonalne, dla których ten odcinek miałby mieć niższą kategorię?
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-03-13 03:27:11+00:00): Gdzie wiki tak twierdzi że każda DW ma mieć highway=secondary?
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-03-13 03:29:06+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Drogi#Klasyfikacja_urz%C4%99dowa_a_oznaczenia_na_OpenStreetMap
kubahahaha (2026-03-13 15:02:19+00:00): Nie trzymamy się ściśle klasyfikacji urzędowej, zwłaszcza jeżeli długi odcinek jest leśną, nieutwardzoną drogą.

Zobacz linka, którego podesłał Mateusz. Zmiany wyższych kategorii dróg warto dyskutować wcześniej na forum, albo odpuścić w ogóle zmiany kategorii i mapować inne rzeczy
qstep (2026-03-11 15:43:44+00:00): Üdv! name nem kell ezekhez, mert a leisure=bleachers már leírja. A többihez sem kell, de azokat nem te vitted fel. Ha gondolod, javíthatod.

Köszi.
Wildsharky (2026-03-13 08:40:53+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: 179729476
NeisBot (2026-03-10 15:46:17+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13524371965 v5

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Beauty salon"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisAgent (2026-03-11 17:22:25+00:00): 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again?
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-06 09:15:36+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags/values in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/185185142
MappingMore (2026-03-15 03:55:01+00:00): Partially Revert of 179645554
bxl-forever (2026-03-10 15:53:59+00:00): Hello,

Please do NOT modify buildings.
If you want to add shops, cafés, etc. please create floating nodes inside the building.

I will revert your edit.
Audyolo (2026-03-10 16:07:48+00:00): Hello,

I'm so so sorry, I didn't see your messages. I won't do it anymore.
qstep (2026-03-11 15:41:52+00:00): Üdv! A fence_type=barbed_wire már leírja, hogy milyen anyagból van. Ettől még megadhatod a material=* -t de akkor a wikiből válassz értéket.

note nem kell, mert a többi címke már leírja. Most akkor 3.5 vagy 4m magas, mert a height-ben 4 van. 

Javítsd kérlek, köszi!
iandees (2026-03-10 16:02:17+00:00): Hi! It looks like a node in this changeset was accidentally moved. This can happen when panning the map. The node has been moved back to its previous position.
JJIglesias (2026-03-10 16:30:15+00:00): Saludos Marco Antonio.
El valor que pusiste a Puerto Quijarro es Incorrecto segun el CPV2024, Colocaste 17522 habitantes, pero ese valor esta mal, el Censo arrojo 12371 habitantes para Puerto Quijarro y 5151 para Arroyo Concepcion y tu los estas sumando (17522), lo cual NO es correcto.

Puerto Quijarro demograficamente NO es una ciudad (politicamente si puede serlo si como tal ha sido nombrada). Pero los numeros que pusiste NO son correctos.
5m4u9 (2026-03-10 22:58:10+00:00): Ya encontré mi error, iré corrigiendo.

Respecto a ciudad o no. me estoy basando en el acuerdo que llagamos hace años de place=city >10mil y así... esta escrito en -> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Bolivia/Convenciones/Lugares
JJIglesias (2026-03-11 00:28:11+00:00): Con respecto a ese acuerdo creo q esta mal escrito. Sobre 5 mil habitantes era TOWN, y sobre 25 mil habitantes era CITY (Con la excepcion de aquellas ciudades que habian sido declaradas como tal, aunque no tuvieran los habitantes - Tiquipaya por ejemplo).

De hecho acabo de revisar la tabla de control del CNPV2012 y efectivamente todos las CITY en OSM tenían más de 25K habitantes y los TOWN más de 5000 habitantes hasta 24999.

Ese fue el acuerdo y como tal están colocadas las poblaciones en OSM
JJIglesias (2026-03-11 00:31:33+00:00): Yo mantengo y actualizo la tabla de control master del CNVP2012 y su relación con OSM y ahora le estoy incorporando la data del CPV2024. Por eso los datos de Place= y Population= corresponden al Censo del 2012 mientras vamos incorporando los datos del Censo 2024, incluyendo nuevos ajustes a nombres y posiciones, hechos en 2024 por el INE
JJIglesias (2026-03-11 00:36:08+00:00): y me corrijo de uno de mis comentarios. Cotoca si mas que duplico su población entre 2012 y 2024
iandees (2026-03-10 16:04:21+00:00): Hi! It looks like a node in this changeset was accidentally moved. This can happen when panning the map. The node has been moved back to its previous position.
Udarian (2026-03-10 16:32:41+00:00): what is your source for these points?

Happy mapping,
Udar
Udarian (2026-03-10 16:40:57+00:00): Also, just to make sure I correctly understand what this changeset is trying to do, these are supposed to be the points of highest elevation in each county?
JackFrank (2026-03-10 18:33:21+00:00): Yes the source is found here: https://www.peakbagger.com/list.aspx?lid=13508
Udarian (2026-03-10 20:42:14+00:00): From what I can tell peakbagger.com is a proprietary source that does specifically allow usage as a source for OSM contributions and thus cannot be used as a source for OSM contributions.

Happy mapping,
Udar.
Taya_S (2026-03-12 09:43:06+00:00): Hello JackFrank,

Before you resume mapping, please answer whether you have gotten written permission to import this data into OSM and whether you've completed the https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines before adding all this data.

Best regards,  
Taya Snijder,  
On behalf of the OSMF Data Working Group
qstep (2026-03-11 15:40:14+00:00): Üdv az OSM-en! Ezt javítsd kérlek:

- blind=no nem kell
- ref nem kell
- kerekesszékkel használható fitness park?

Köszi.
eggie (2026-03-10 16:36:53+00:00): Dag HJS,
Je hebt de landuse = constructio verwijderd, maar zijn dan al die bedrijven al opgeleverd. Ik zie ze niet op de kaart. 

Dit vlak kan gewoon landuse=construction blijven.
https://viewer.satellietdataportaal.nl/@52.27313,6.392401,17/?datastrip=20260307_SVNEO-04&sensorname=SuperView-NEO

MVG
eggie
HJS_Holten (2026-03-10 17:51:47+00:00): Er zijn al wel vergunningen verleend. Perceel is bouwrijp.
HJS_Holten (2026-03-10 17:52:04+00:00): Mvg
Henk
eggie (2026-03-10 17:58:40+00:00): Oke... Grond waar nog niet mee gebeurt maar wel plannen voor zijn taggen we met landuse=greenfield
Op het moment van bouwactiviteiten is het landuse=construction
Je zou zo n vlak kunnen maken.
Up to you..
Groet,
eggie
little_maper (2026-03-11 09:08:17+00:00): Hello Renas Azad,
Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap in Iraq. I noticed you converted several highways from under construction to operational.
Ids for highways:
way 1292070953
way 946917894
way 946917895
way 1292070952
Could you please provide us with the source you used to convert these highways?
If they are operational according to OpenStreetMap rules, we need to remove the construction tags from these highways.
Additionally, there is a dead-end issue on some highways.
Ids for highways:
way 1445771783
way 1446212491
Please check these issues and address them.
Could you also share the source used for these conversions?
Regards,
little_maper
Renas Azad (2026-03-11 10:06:41+00:00): Welcome my friend.

The road has been partially opened, as announced by the city municipality through the media, and I personally drived over it. about the dead ends with no exits, there are temporary, unofficial U-turns to solve the issue until the project is fully completed in September of this year, according to the city municipality's estimate and statement.

Note: You can visually verify the above details using Google Maps, as its maps are up-to-date and display much of the information mentioned.

Thank you very much for your follow-up and interest.
little_maper (2026-03-11 11:38:39+00:00): Hello Renas Azad,
I appreciate your response and the sufficient explanation.

Of course, you can rely on your local knowledge to open this road, but you need to select that you uploaded this information based on your local knowledge in the changeset source tag. You can read that: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source
Also, copying from "Google Maps" is not allowed due to legal restrictions, and for more information, you can read that https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google
Now we need to fix two issues. The first one is if the highways still have some construction works, we can modify the tag "construction=primary" to  "construction=minor". For more information in OpenStreetMap Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:construction=minor
The second issue is that the dead-end highways can you add the temporary U-turn based on your local knowledge until the construction works end, and happy mapping!
Regards
little_maper
Wildsharky (2026-03-13 06:11:55+00:00): Revert of 179646466
MappingMore (2026-03-15 02:04:07+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:179881269
schobbish (2026-03-11 16:22:35+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap! I see you have cited “Wikipedia / Google Maps” as a source. Info from Google Maps cannot be copied over to OSM due to copyright/licensing issues. I think the same applies to Wikipedia, but I see that the Arbor Hills article there also cites Google Maps, so that is certainly suspect either way. Can you provide an official source (e.g. from plano.gov) or on-the-ground evidence for the name of this pond?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179647980
schobbish (2026-03-12 17:23:26+00:00): Reverted due to no response and after confirmation with city staff that this pond is not named

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179768548
MappingMore (2026-03-11 11:58:02+00:00): Revert of 179624226
Layft Greater (2026-05-20 10:40:47+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1121185777

how to resolve fixme?
NeisBot (2026-03-10 16:31:04+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13634302764 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Cleaning service building"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-18 17:33:09+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180071776
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-17 01:46:23+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with advertising/malformed tags and explicit source=* of Google Maps, which is not allowed by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ), in changeset 184205183

https://osm.org/changeset/184205183
Wildsharky (2026-03-13 08:35:35+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: 179685733
eggie (2026-03-19 11:57:52+00:00): ..shop=tailor bestaat ook en rendert wel.
Groet,
eggie
Wildsharky (2026-03-13 06:11:13+00:00): Revert of 179617627
MappingMore (2026-03-16 04:47:38+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:179926860
JJIglesias (2026-03-10 22:06:47+00:00): Misma situación, según CPV2024 la Población de San Jose de Chiquitos es de 12971 habitantes, NO es 13131.

Ni la pagina del INE ni el Geoportal del INE respaldan la cifras que estas colocando que estan TODAS erradas.

Y por cierto el Nombre local de San Jose de Chiquitos es SAN JOSE, nadie localmente lo llama por su nombre completo...
5m4u9 (2026-03-10 22:31:38+00:00): Seguro? para 2024 en la página -> https://cpv2024.ine.gob.bo/index.php/principal/principales-resultados-v3/ muestra pob. urbana 13131 como se ve en esta captura -> https://imgur.com/42lRrIZ 

Oh, si, mi error en el loc_name lo restituyo.