piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
TrickyFoxy (2025-09-09 20:21:38+00:00): 👋 Don't forget to use ESRI images. They are fresher in Russia
user_5359 (2025-09-10 08:08:19+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database.
Please only draw in existing objects and facts. I have now reverted your changes.
Your business isn't a park.
Piagno (2025-09-16 18:38:32+00:00): zum fixme bezüglich dem access. Es steht nichts geschrieben vor Ort, aber auf der Website vom Aareträff steht, dass nur für Warenumschlag (Mieter Aareträff) und mit Parkberechtigung gefahren werden darf, deswegen ist private ganz ok.
dafadllyn (2025-09-21 15:47:25+00:00): Sälu!
Danke für den Hinweis. Ja, in dem Fall passt motor_vehicle=private am besten. Allerdings müsste https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25695282/ meines Erachtens eher highway=service anstatt highway=track sein, da es sich nicht um einen (Land-/Forst)wirtschaftsweg handelt.
LG
Piagno (2025-09-24 00:57:30+00:00): Ja das macht noch Sinn, habe das angepasst.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172369498
dafadllyn (2025-09-24 05:54:05+00:00): Merci!
eggie (2025-09-09 18:38:15+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback  Eigenlijk is bicycle=yes default en hoef je dus niet toe te voegen.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-10-11 03:04:29+00:00): Please don't use roads as boundary members.
This changeset connected a tunnel to the road that crosses it.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171700679
DD1GJ (2025-09-14 20:11:59+00:00): Hallo chriz_osm,

vielen Dank für das Lösen des Rätsels von T-AB-680. Diese Bezeichnung spukte bereits vor einigen Jahren durch die Datenbank, siehe die Versionshistorie von AB-L-2114. Das Zusammenlegen der beiden Punkte mag zwar eine logische Vereinfachung sein, aber praktisch wird dadurch in zahlreichen Anwendungen und Abgleichen keiner der Punkte mehr gefunden. Ich habe daher die Zusammenlegung rückgängig gemacht.

Viele Grüße, Joachim
chriz_osm (2025-09-15 20:42:19+00:00): Hallo Joachim,

Danke für die Nachricht / den Kommentar. Das ist gut zu wissen; werde zukünftig solche Punkte getrennt halten.

Viele Grüße
chriz
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-09-29 02:28:54+00:00): thanks for a fix!
pavvv (2025-09-09 19:55:04+00:00): Akurat w Polsce nie używamy highway=busway tylko highway=service + access=no + bus=designated.
ManuelB701 (2025-09-10 05:40:25+00:00): Powracałem, też że nie lubię taką decyzje (nie jest dojazd np.).
pavvv (2025-09-10 14:24:39+00:00): Główny powód to brak renderu na carto (domyślnym stylu mapy) z powodu lobbowania przez samych deweloperów. Jeżeli uda się przejąć na mapy wektorowe, to może zrobimy dyskusję wśród społeczności, żeby zacząć używać ten tag.
notmyproblem1 (2025-11-01 18:24:32+00:00): That's not a phone number. I'm fixing your error.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-04-21 16:00:46+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/764436600/history has religion = protestant that was added in this edit
what was meant by religion=protestant ? It is duplicate of religion=christian denomination=protestant - right?
0xb7767000 (2025-09-09 22:08:11+00:00): Danke!
pavvv (2025-09-09 19:53:43+00:00): Wielkie dzięki! Przez cały czas myślałem, że to wina walidatora, ale to jednak ja zrobiłem literówkę. Jednak pominąłeś kilka relacji, m.in. tramwaje linii 3.
ManuelB701 (2025-09-09 20:46:21+00:00): Mile widziane, to jest coś co można łatwo przeoczać.

Re : Pominania niektórych linii : Może być że nie miałę ich ładowane w JOSMie albo coż. Każdym razie, też poprawiłem te linie.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-09-09 19:21:05+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/988902069

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
silversurfer83 (2025-09-10 18:25:07+00:00): Hi :)

is there a reason why you changed tracks from grade1 to grade5? They don't look any worse than grade2 on the aerials.

(Also: please watch out for connected nodes. You connected the track to the landuse which should be avoided)

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171702868
Bienenberm (2025-09-11 15:04:45+00:00): Hallo,
ich habe die Wege - teilweise - mit dem Fahrrad (Tourenrad) abgefahren. Von Norden kommend ist der Weg vielleicht Grad 4, ab Graben nur noch zerfahrenes Sandfeld - viel Fahrradschieben. Der Abzweig nach Süden ist 150 m lang max. Grad 4, ab Knick bis zum Wald aber nicht mehr (wieder umkehren). Dann Richtung Westen ist er ab dem Gehöft bis zum Anschluss an den Asphaltweg immer besser, bis gar Grad 3, da wohl auch PKW befahren. Natürlich ist es dauernd wechselnd, aber der größte Teil nur mit Mountainbike befahrbar und ohne jegliche Befestigung.
Den Knotenpunkt habe ich wieder entfernt, ich wollte eigentlich nur die Weggrade ändern. Sorry, nicht aufgepasst. :(
Gruß.
mcliquid (2025-09-10 19:39:06+00:00): Du hast hier aber "fee=yes" gelöscht und nicht "highspeed=yes".
rarad74 (2025-09-11 14:38:11+00:00): Salut. Te rog sa adaugi diacritice la denumirile diverse pe care le adaugi. 

Multumim pentru intelegere.
eggie (2025-09-09 19:40:03+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-09-09 19:57:55+00:00): Is de naam niet ROC Nijmegen?
user_23274985 (2025-09-09 20:01:08+00:00): Dat het hier verkeerd stond was me nog niet opgevallen, dat klopt. Pas jij het aan?
user_23274985 (2025-09-09 20:04:47+00:00): ROC Nijmegen heeft meerdere locaties, dus misschien is "ROC Nijmegen Marterstraat" logischer voor de naam?
eggie (2025-09-09 20:26:09+00:00): Ik heb het net aangepast op de adresnode. Dan is instelling en adres verbonden. 
Van het gebouw zelf het ik de naam verwijderd. 
Paar keer CTRL-f5 voor het effect.
De tag voor een ROC is dan amenity=college.

Scholen kunnen op veel manieren worden gemapt. 

Groet,
eggie
eggie (2025-09-09 20:30:39+00:00): Nog even aangepast naar name=ROC Nijmegen Locatie Marterstraat
Zo staat het op de gevel. 
https://www.roc-nijmegen.nl/locaties/marterstraat
felipeeugenio (2025-09-10 11:29:04+00:00): Hola. Borró una localidad completa. No existe?

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171703611
Fundación Endémica (2025-09-10 11:57:29+00:00): ¡Estaba mal ubicada! Estamos poniendo los nombres de los lugares, que levantamos en un trabajo en conjunto con la comunidad local.
felipeeugenio (2025-09-10 13:06:40+00:00): Hola. Pero no existe? Si está mal ubicada por favor ubicarla en el lugar que va, pero la borró por completo.

Saludos
Fundación Endémica (2025-09-10 13:46:09+00:00): Si, estoy pasando el mapa para impresión y luego dejaré todos los nombres de lugares que faltan aquí.
RoiEXLab (2025-10-04 16:13:31+00:00): This change is wrong, the transit data is outdated and the station has since been moved to https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13109023557 (but got assigned a new IFOPT id). See https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/gtfs/DE/routes.php?feed=DE-BW-VAG for details
kortgodt (2025-09-10 11:14:50+00:00): Når du kortlægger cykelstier separat husk belægning samt at slette sti fra vej.
literan (2025-09-10 19:54:22+00:00): не надо стаить тег service=driveway. в вики указано, что он - для проездов самого низкого уровня, к частному домику на участке.
RFuser11 (2025-09-11 20:37:49+00:00): ок, постараюсь быть с ним более аккуратным
RFuser11 (2025-09-11 20:38:54+00:00): а какой тег для  уровня проезда над service=driveway,
literan (2025-09-13 10:04:16+00:00): для уровня проезда над service=driveway тег просто highway=service, без уточняющих
RFuser11 (2025-09-13 16:07:28+00:00): ок.  Спасибо за рекомендацию
Frans S (2025-10-29 12:56:42+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please do not add a layer to a building to hide errors.
Best regards
Frans S (2025-10-29 13:51:57+00:00): Hi again. 
The reason you added a layer to this building was wrong. This building, like many other tall (high) buildings are not placed on their footprint. This is the place where the building meets the ground.

Keep an eye on complex buildings. Especial the high rise (multi story) buildings and buildings which shows their sideviews  as well. Check this footage how to map these buildings 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dsfUcslLtVc
https://drive.google.com/file/d/13RTwH7sChRWrG5bIjysF2ripBgh3F5l4/view?usp=sharing 

Best regards and keep mapping
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2025-09-14 15:43:24+00:00): Başka bir değişikliğinizin(changeset/171605393) yorum kısmında bu konu size iletilmiş. Ancak yine de ada "BAİBÜ" kısaltmasını eklemişsiniz. Ayrıca ben de size özel mesajla adların kısaltılarak yazılmaması gerektiği, kurumu belirtmek istiyorsanız operator= etiketinin kullanılabileceği, aynı konudaki değişikliklerinizin gruplandırabileceği...gibi bir çok konuyu içeren bir özel mesaj yollamıştım. Sanırım görmemişsiniz. Bu nedenle bu değişikliğinize yorum yazıyorum. Lütfen düzenlemelerinizden önce wiki'deki ilgili sayfaları okuyunuz.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Good_practice
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Abbreviations
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Group_similar_changes_together

İyi günler.
DeFra85 (2025-09-12 21:15:43+00:00): Hej, schön das du die Wanderweg-Relation vom Emsweg zerstörst.
Gibt es eine Umleitung vor Ort? Dann bitte eintragen und korrigieren.
hambre (2025-09-13 08:16:07+00:00): Sorry, war ein Versehen. Die Baustelle ist für Fußgänger und Radfahrer weiterhin passierbar. Ich habe die Relation wiederhergestellt.
DeFra85 (2025-10-17 21:57:49+00:00): Ahoi, ich mal wieder.
Ich habe gesehen, dass du auf highway=path/footway/cycleway das Attribut oneway=yes benutzt. Das ist an sich falsch, da ich als Fußgänger dort laufen darf wie ich mag. Für Radfahrer gilt das jedoch nicht, wenn auf beiden Seiten Radwege sind. Deshalb benutze doch oneway:bicycle=yes
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2025-09-14 16:00:16+00:00): Merhaba. Yurt binasını ve yurdu tanımlamak için  kullandığınız etiketlerin doğru olduğuna emin misiniz? Lütfen bir etiketi kullanmadan önce eklemek istediğiniz etiketin daha önceden başka bir adla kullanılıp kullanılmadığını araştırınız. Örneğin building=dormitory etiketi eklediğiniz yer için daha uygun gibi duruyor, zira önceden defalarca kullanılmış. Bkz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Ddormitory
building=student_accomodation'u ise Dünya'da tek kullanan sizsiniz

Yine Viki'de guest_house=student_accomodation etiketinin ön şartı olarak tourism=guesyt_house kullanılması önerilmiş. Siz tourism=hostel etiketi eklemişsiniz. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:guest%20house

Ayrıca yurtlar için tourism=hostel yerine Viki'de başka öneriler mevcut. 
Bkz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Ddormitory

Bkz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dstudent_accommodation
Frans S (2025-10-31 11:17:36+00:00): Hello/ Thanks for mapping. Sorry that it takes a while before reviewing your work.

Keep an eye on complex buildings. Especial the high rise (multi story) buildings and buildings which shows their side views as well. Check this footage how to map these buildings 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dsfUcslLtVc
https://drive.google.com/file/d/13RTwH7sChRWrG5bIjysF2ripBgh3F5l4/view?usp=sharing 
Another issue.
Please square each rectangular building with the Q key while selected.
Do not connect nodes of buildings to other features, roads, other buildings.
Buildings with a gable roof are basicly rectangular, from the satellite they are taken under a certain angle. Then you will see both the roof and the sidewall(s)
https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Ftse1.mm.bing.net%2Fth%2Fid%2FOIP.TlT-Mgq8Quv-2tITDBSQaQHaFm%3Fpid%3DApi&f=1&ipt=e904763ea2d73090cf243655c6020c222cdb475583dbfe58cca9bb97b3d7a292&ipo=images
Best regards and keep mapping
santamariense (2025-09-10 12:24:15+00:00): Olá JOAO_PREFEITURA MUNICIPAL CORRENTINA,

Bem-vindo ao OSM. Por que você deletou todas essas ruas?

santamariense
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-09-09 22:13:36+00:00): Hello, why did you delete the node for the Las Vegas Paiute Tribe headquarters? I have a feeling that this change will cause it to no longer appear.
Joseph R P (2025-09-10 00:51:58+00:00): The headquarters isn't a village, despite it being entirely separate from the City of Las Vegas, since it isn't its own community or jurisdiction. The Las Vegas Indian Colony is one entity which includes the main area with the headquarters north of Downtown plus Snow Mountain by NW Las Vegas.
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-09-10 02:26:23+00:00): Alright then, thanks for the information!
tg4567 (2025-09-10 09:39:02+00:00): hocam köprüde ufak bir hata olmuş, düzelttim: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171726354
dzamper (2026-06-30 13:01:21+00:00): This edit has completely changed the route of https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5399654
MassCartog (2025-09-10 18:49:56+00:00): Hey welcome to OSM! These ways through parking lots were actually mapped correctly. Check out other examples if you are unsure about how to map things. Thanks!
VictorIE (2025-09-10 06:56:52+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1428381383

Should this be tagged as a drainage ditch?
Dafo43 (2025-09-10 09:13:49+00:00): fixed now
Unarmored5156 (2025-09-10 07:30:29+00:00): Hi there, I've reverted this change and added access=private to define the roads as private. 

I strongly recommend you read both of these wiki articles:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won't_delete_roads_on_private_property

Others have had to do this before for the same reason from you, so be warned that if you continue to do this you may receive a bit more pushback.

Thanks :)
AShiloh (2025-09-09 21:48:54+00:00): Some areas were bright white or flat grey and hard to tell if they were buildings or flat paved surfaces.
Supaplex030 (2025-09-10 11:17:37+00:00): Hallo, worauf basiert denn die Information, dass die Pettenkoferstraße nur noch für Taxis freigegeben ist? Wäre dann nicht auch der gesamte Anwohnerverkehr ausgeschlossen und es würde bspw. keinen Parkraum mehr geben?
(Als ich im April das letzte mal vorbeikam, war es jedenfalls noch Anlieger frei: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=948506757355548)
Lg, Alex
Supaplex030 (2025-09-21 15:34:05+00:00): Habe die Änderung zurückgesetzt, da sie nicht stimmte.
eggie (2025-09-10 09:19:14+00:00): Dag Padvinder,

Er is hier geen sprake van een track.. Dat is zo te zien  omgeploegd.
Zet je svp accesstag op die paden?  

MVG
eggie
silversurfer83 (2025-09-10 19:03:16+00:00): Hi :)

du hast hier alle neuen Zufahrten mit dem Umriss des Hofes verbunden. Tu sowas bitte nicht. Wege und landuse sollten nicht verbunden werden.

Die Zufahrten im hinteren Hofbereich sollten vielleicht auch noch "service=driveway" sein, da sie ja auch nur Grundstückszufahrten sind, oder?

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171708966
Gregory Peony (2025-09-10 01:28:35+00:00): Hi, it looks like you mapped these residential areas with a similar workflow to what would be used to map building footprints. This has led to less accurate mapping. We square footprints after tracing them becasue the shape is likely square, however this is not necessarily the case with residential areas. For instance a city block may be accurately mapped as a squared residential area, but these rural settlements likely have more complex residential areas. You can use more than 4 nodes, you know. Consider natural boundaries, the colour of the ground, and how the land is being used when mapping residnetial areas. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171709044
Gregory Peony (2025-09-10 02:11:06+00:00): see how I mapped these residential areas and place points here https://osmcha.org/changesets/171712273
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171709044
custodiankeyy (2025-09-10 19:47:31+00:00): Yeni eklemiş olduğunuz 6329/4. Sokak resmiyette yaya öncelikli yol olarak mı geçiyor?

Düzenledim, yanlışsa söyleyin lütfen.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171753423
çokamaçokgizliOSM (2025-09-10 20:10:23+00:00): Üzgünüm ama o konuda bilgim yok.
custodiankeyy (2025-09-11 16:36:16+00:00): O şekilde haritalandırmışsınız da o yüzden sormuştum.
Gregory Peony (2025-09-09 23:58:53+00:00): These residential areas look valid and the place in the NE is correctly mapped. Please take care to map as accuartely as you can; in some areas the residential areas you mapped overlap existing building footpritns. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171709386
redd (2025-09-10 18:43:28+00:00): Leider ist mir hier ein Fehler unterlaufen, da Vespucci ein paar Test-Änderungen nicht verworfen waren.

Die Änderungen in Fulda müssen noch einmal geprüft werden.
redd (2025-09-10 19:36:58+00:00): Änderungen in Fulda habe ich nun geprüft und sind in Ordnung.

Dort sind nun mehrere Verklebungen von Straße und Fläche aufgelöst
Gregory Peony (2025-09-10 00:25:03+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You correctly identified and tagged the settlement you added here. Highways should follow the centre of the road; use more nodes on turns and curves. The highway you added looks wide enough for a car to use so should be tagged as unclassified. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171710133
Gregory Peony (2025-09-10 04:14:25+00:00): Resolution: see how I mapped the southern highway in https://osmcha.org/changesets/171714549
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171710133
Gregory Peony (2025-09-10 00:21:39+00:00): This highway could be slightly more accurate but it's certainly wide enough for a car. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171710258
Gregory Peony (2025-09-10 00:20:21+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You have correctly identified settlements and highways. The settlements have been correctly tagged but could be at times slightly more accurate (smaller). These highways are more likely uncassified; residential highways are only typically found in larger settlements with several roads. Highways should follow the centre of roads; use more nodes when mapping turns and curves. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171710289
Gregory Peony (2025-09-10 00:14:43+00:00): Welcome to OSM! you correctly identified settlements and highways but the residential areas here are incorrectly tagged. The area should be tagged as a residential area and a POI should be tagged with the place value e.g. hamlet. Highways and residential areas should not share nodes; hold alt to prevent this. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171710305
Gregory Peony (2025-09-10 00:10:26+00:00): Welcome to OSM! The residential area and place tag look accurate, but the highways you added could be more accurate since highways should follow the centre of paths. Add more nodes on corners and curves. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171710325
Gregory Peony (2025-09-10 00:06:28+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Do not conect highways and residential areas, hold alt in ID to prevent this. The residential area you mapped in the north is likely a cemetary. Place tags look appropriate. Highways should follow the centre of the road; use more nodes on curves, turns and bends. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171710358
Gregory Peony (2025-09-10 00:35:52+00:00): You are idenitfying groups of buildings but on a few occasions you tagged areas as place= rather than adding a POI with that tag. The area should be tagged as residential landuse. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171710574
Glassman (2025-09-11 17:52:16+00:00): Where you separated North Line Street to connect to West A Street, that should likely be a tertiary_link.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171710664
Glassman (2025-09-11 17:53:56+00:00): It's also a good to add a tag to describe the business of Lux AutoHouse. In the editor, just search for the type of business to add the tag.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171710664