piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Metzor (2024-07-09 20:59:32+00:00): Hallo Fabian,

Du hast den Kiosk aus dem Tankstelleneintrag rausgelöscht. Wieso, wenn du nicht weißt, ob es diesen nicht mehr gibt?

Du hast eine komische Internetadresse an die Easchanlage gehängt. Wenn das aus Versehen war, Lösch die Internetadrrsse halt wieder.

Ich wünsche dir einen schönen Abend!
Metzor
Fabian007 (2024-07-11 16:52:40+00:00): Hallo Metzor,

Vielen dank, für deine Nachricht!

Ich habe die Internetseite, von den der Waschanlage entfernt, sodass der Ort noch steht, aber leider ohne Internetadresse.

Bei den Kiosk kann ich leider nicht sehen, weil ich es nicht im Internet mehr finde und weiß leider nicht, wie mann das mit den Kiosk wieder rückgangig machen, und es ist schwierig, diese wiederherzustellen.

Kannst du das bitte, für mich tuen?

Danke, und einen schönen Abend dir noch!

MFG Fabianbuecheler
Fabian007 (2024-07-11 16:54:17+00:00): 

Hallo Metzor,

Vielen Dank, für deine Nachricht!

Ich habe die Internetseite, von den der Waschanlage entfernt, sodass der Ort noch steht, aber leider ohne Internetadresse.

Bei dem Kiosk kann ich bedauerlicherweise nicht sehen, weil ich es nicht im Internet mehr finde und weiß bedauerlicherweise nicht, wie man das mit dem Kiosk wieder rückgängig machen, und es ist schwierig, diese wiederherzustellen.

Kannst du das bitte für mich tun?

Danke, und einen schönen Abend dir noch!

MFG Fabianbuecheler
archie (2024-07-04 19:56:46+00:00): Hej och välkommen till osm. Vänligen observera att landuse och highway inte skall fogas ihop med gemensamma noder (punkter).
KH-L (2024-07-05 12:29:26+00:00): Hej! Tack för påpekande, osäker på vad det betyder och varför :)
archie (2024-07-05 12:52:14+00:00): way (linjen) som representerar vägen/gatan är dess mittlinje. På denn skall vi inte hänga på landuse-linjen. Landuse slutar vid vägkanten och inte i mitten av vägen. 
Förstår du?
KH-L (2024-07-05 15:39:00+00:00): Aha, ja såklart, det läste jag ju igår men glömde tills jag gjorde åkern.
JayTurnr (2024-07-31 21:18:39+00:00): Hi, you set https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1336666241 as having a crossing island. However, it doesn't look like it has one on aerial imagery. Is imagery out of date or was this a mistake?
RyanBush (2024-07-31 21:41:12+00:00): Hey, you’re right looks like I made a mistake there, I should have corrected it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154669305
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-11-13 09:09:23+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/84037948/history - have you meant https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface=earth ?
maraf24 (2024-08-30 18:52:43+00:00): /rev
wolfbert (2025-06-05 18:06:35+00:00): Hallo, sind Lindenweg und der Weg daneben Wohnstraßen oder Begegnungszonen? Für erstere müsste die 30er-Zone entfernt werden.
Ich2PunktNull (2025-06-05 20:49:00+00:00): Sind tatsächlich Wohnstraßen
Hab die maxspeed-Werte entfernt
wolfbert (2025-06-05 21:17:39+00:00): Danke!
L29Ah (2024-07-05 16:19:56+00:00): You should map buildings relative to surrounding objects, not their roofs on some specific image. See:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Roof_modelling
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Using_aerial_imagery
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153564220
une abeille (2024-07-05 01:15:50+00:00): You just saved me so much work on park micromapping with this import. 🎉
une abeille (2024-07-05 01:18:55+00:00): This data is so up-to-date that the tree they cut down in front of my apartment this week is already gone from the data!
Spearfish7424 (2024-07-05 01:48:06+00:00): Happy to hear that you find it helpful:)
NorthCrab_upload (2024-07-04 20:50:32+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1299126062

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
archie (2024-07-04 20:58:32+00:00): Hej, jag har reverterat denn cs. Parkeringsplatsen är omgärdad av ett staket. GC-vägen kan inte gå fram där. Bing visar gamla uppgifter; dvs en gammal sträckning på gc-vägen.
KH-L (2024-07-05 15:37:56+00:00): Tack!
SomeoneElse (2024-07-04 22:31:03+00:00): Hello,
You've changed https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1 to an "amenity=doctors".  What that something that you really wanted to do?
Besy Regards,
Andy
tyr_asd (2024-07-07 19:47:26+00:00): At first glance it looks like something was configured "funnily" on this particular maproulette challenge: https://mpr.lt/c/48636/t/234988012 points to `node/1`, which does not make sense if you ask me. I have just contacted the creator of this particular maproulette challenge, to prevent this from happening again.
I'll also go ahead and remove the superfluous tags from node 1 now.

Happy mapping! :)
SomeoneElse (2024-07-08 10:39:11+00:00): @tyr_asd Thanks for fixing. That comedy "mpr.lt" doesn't even resolve for me!
topolusitania (2024-07-07 11:42:20+00:00): Olá 
O uso do RapiD para o desenho de edifícios não isolados em meio urbano é altamente desaconselhado. O RapiD não consegue individualizar cada um e desenha como único um conjunto de edifícios perfeitamente distintos no terreno, ou mesmo verificando as fotos satélite.
PedroMTG13 (2024-07-07 11:59:16+00:00): Olá Topolusitania,
Eu tenho noção do que dizes, já uso do RapiD à bastante tempo, e tenho a sensação que melhorou no ultimo ano.
Sobre este changeset não posso dizer que é uma área muito urbana ou muito rural, será um misto, com muitos edifícios, mas muitos deles são isolados, outros de apartamentos. 
Tentarei ter cuidado nos não isolados, mas tudo isso pode ser corrigido à medida que se deteta.
Obrigado
SomeoneElse (2024-07-08 10:42:03+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Please use actual words in your changeset comments that explains what you are actually doing.  Here you've just used some gibberish characters that don't mean anything.

Best Regards,
Andy

PS Any questions, please don't hesitate to ask.
SomeoneElse (2024-07-08 10:43:41+00:00): ¡Hola y bienvenido a OpenStreetMap!

Utilice palabras reales en los comentarios de su conjunto de cambios que expliquen lo que realmente está haciendo. Aquí acabas de utilizar algunos caracteres galimatías que no significan nada.

Atentamente,
andy

PD: Cualquier duda no dudes en preguntar.
Lumikeiju (2024-07-05 00:22:40+00:00): The elements in this Changeset: 153565207 (Part 1) have been further edited in Changeset: 153568560 (Part 2). Please leave any feedback for this changeset there, rather than here. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153568560
Filip009 (2024-07-08 13:04:24+00:00): Zdravím, prečo ste pomenoval danú čiaru? Existuje tu niečo také ako relácia, ktorá zlučuje viac ciest, vďaka ktorým je Juhoslovenská kotlina vytvorená ako relácia a nie je nutné pomenovávať je hranice a nastavovať ich ako hranice administratívnej oblasti. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1934483
bergfrei (2024-09-29 05:12:29+00:00): Hello m4c3o,

thank you for your contribution to the OSM corrections.
With the change:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153565570
you have set ‘noexit=yes’, I have removed this:
see: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:noexit%3Dyes

"...
When not to use

This tag should not be used when the way is only a dead-end for one transport mode, but where other modes can continue. By way of example don't use it at the end of a motorised road where a footpath continues. 
..."

Furthermore, when using the aerial photos, please note that there are always deviations between aerial photo <=> reality. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Using_aerial_imagery

"...
Imagery and OSM

As a background layer within editors, we can use Bing, IRS, Landsat, and some others. All of these can be used to create and modify objects, but consider that each may have an offset or other kinds of distortions.

Initially, tiled imagery starts life as individual photos, taken from a satellite or airplane, tagged with a center coordinate (which itself is subject to errors, see below on GPS). The photo's corner coordinates can usually be derived from height-above-ground and lens properties. With that, special software can be used to transform it into a projection that is more commonly used with OSM map making. This transformation is not perfect, and may induce distortion and position errors. ..."

I have also moved the position of the waypoints

1) The original positions were based on MAPS4BW (which is unfortunately no longer available) and these were a very good template.
2) in my experience, the aerial images from ESRI are the better choice in this area. However, this may be different in other areas.

Greetings bergfrei
m4c3o (2024-09-29 17:29:45+00:00): Hello bergfrei, 

thanks for your edits. I'm just learning to edit the right way and appreciate some feedback a lot!

Greetings
bergfrei (2024-10-01 09:29:49+00:00): Hello m4c3o

no problem, even after years I am grateful for every tip from the community.

 Greetings bergfrei
Gertjan Idema (2024-09-07 13:57:26+00:00): Hi Anna,
May I ask why you sometimes add bus stops at the wrong side of the road? 
For this route, bus stop Blekenweg on the right site of the road was already includes, but you also added the bus stop on the other side of the road.
Yuuria (2024-07-04 21:35:18+00:00): Oops, source is https://www.blansko.cz/sprava-mesta/mestska-policie/kamerovy-system.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-07-04 21:50:16+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7986023571
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/749185289

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-11-11 23:17:06+00:00): It would be good to comment on the offending changeset so they're more likely to read it.
Filip009 (2024-07-08 13:21:36+00:00): Zdravím, smerovníky sú často nepresné. Najpresnejšie je to podľa DMR. Podľa toho je vrchol v nadmorskej výške cca 427 m.n.m. https://www.freemap.sk/#map=19/48.364729/17.164215&layers=X&osm-node=5657428405
sferencik (2024-07-09 10:08:45+00:00): Ahoj, dakujem, ze reagujes. Ja sam na to nemam silny nazor. Tu je vsetko, co o tom viem:

1) Ked som na ten vrchol prisiel, prekvapil ma nesulad (mapy.cz: 445mnm, miestne znacenie 418mnm), tak som to zareportoval mapam.cz, tie ma odkazali na OpenStreetMap.

2) Vrstevnice som pozeral, skutocne ukazuju, ze to bude viac, nez 420mnm.

3) Miestne znacenie je 418mnm, rovnako na turistickom smerovniku (https://en.mapy.cz/turisticka?q=hradisko&source=osm&id=1067278058&ds=2&gallery=1&sourcep=foto&idp=6929750&x=17.1640539&y=48.3650085&z=19) ako na naucnej tabuli (https://en.mapy.cz/turisticka?q=hradisko&source=osm&id=1067278058&ds=2&gallery=1&sourcep=foto&idp=6429515&x=17.1640539&y=48.3650085&z=19). Samozrejme je pravdepodobne, ze to druhe je odvodene od toho prveho, takze nejde o nezavisle potvrdenie tej vysky.

4) Za zmienku stoji este sedielko Pod Hradiskom, https://en.mapy.cz/s/pegocukato. Tam je tiez smerovnik s kotou 409mnm, hoci vrstevnice naznacuju, ze by mal byt cez 410mnm. Vid tiez fotky na mapy.cz.

Neviem presne, ako postupovat. Ja som sa obmedzil na rozhodovanie medzi 445mnm a 418mnm a to sa mi zdalo jednoznacne v prospech toho nizsieho. Ak si myslis, ze je spravne odhadnut to podla vrstevnic, nemam namietky. Odhadol by som to ale blizsie k 420mnm (napr. 423mnm), lebo vrchol je dost placaty (opat vid fotky na mapy.cz), takze tie vrstevnice podla mna neindikuju, ze to je skoro 430mnm. Tak by sme sa dostali aj blizsie ku kotovanej hodnote.
Dodko (2024-07-10 13:40:42+00:00): Na ZBGIS je 445
vrchol
https://zbgis.skgeodesy.sk/mapka/sk/zakladna-mapa/detail/zbgis/79/1005524?pos=48.364532,17.163829,18
výšková kóta
https://zbgis.skgeodesy.sk/mapka/sk/zakladna-mapa/detail/zbgis/20/75498?pos=48.364607,17.163568,18
Na DMR je 423.5 m n.m.
https://zbgis.skgeodesy.sk/mapka/sk/teren?pos=48.364532,17.163829,18
Filip009 (2024-07-10 13:46:13+00:00): Podľa DMR to je 426.96. Teda tak to vypočítal @*Martin* priamo z DMR dát viď. ele:bpv.
sferencik (2024-07-10 14:01:52+00:00): Takze co, mam to zmenit na 427? A ele.bpv nechat na 426.96?
sferencik (2024-07-10 14:02:08+00:00): A ako sa to da vypocitat, do buducna?
Filip009 (2024-07-10 14:18:03+00:00): Tu je o tom konverzácia https://groups.google.com/g/osm_sk/c/a5RccKl7alM/m/jbIkIwdPAAAJ
PcMouse1 (2024-07-06 05:01:31+00:00): added houses
emersonveenstra (2024-07-09 18:14:32+00:00): Hi there,

You created https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1299146201 with no tags, could you please go back and tag it? Thanks!
amacmcgrann (2024-07-24 23:53:11+00:00): Done
NorthCrab_upload (2024-07-04 23:01:32+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Modlińska":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12034878375
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12034878376

"Rolna":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12034878384

"Pod Lipą":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12034878414

"Daktylowa":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12034878536

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
syntex (2024-07-05 11:31:43+00:00): Naprawione
citrula (2024-07-04 23:56:40+00:00): Does "Future American Perimeter Trail" exist right now?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153567634
Pikachu25 (2024-07-05 00:22:34+00:00): It says ‘future’, so not currently, but planning is in progress, and it will exist in the near future.
Pikachu25 (2024-07-05 00:29:52+00:00): You can ask Rue McKenrick of the American Perimeter Trail Conference if you are still unconvinced. This is a legitimate future segment.
citrula (2024-07-05 03:24:05+00:00): It's best to just wait until the trail is completed to add it to the map. Proposed and future features don't belong on OSM.
Pikachu25 (2024-07-05 03:32:42+00:00): Just as an FYI, I have seen at least 10 future trails mapped on OSM before they were built, including one that I personally went through all the planning and approval process to create, what makes this one any different?
Mashin (2024-07-05 15:06:31+00:00): Hi,
What time scale are we talking until it is finished? Months, a year, 10 years?

In any case, to avoid confusion with an existing trails it should either be mapped as:

proposed:highway=path
or
planned:highway=path
Pikachu25 (2024-07-05 15:32:59+00:00): It should take at least a year to complete, as we are primarily working on conserving 20 Edgerton Road, which is for sale(‘Future American Perimeter Trail’ passes through this parcel). Also, thanks for the feedback, I will change it to proposed:highway=path, though I am not sure it will fit in aesthetically.
Pikachu25 (2024-07-05 15:40:18+00:00): Also, I wanted to note that the section of the Maple Swamp-Discovery Hill Connector, aka Kettle Hole, in Sandwich, Massachusetts, was mapped before it was built, and it used the very same OSM style that ‘Future American Perimeter Trail’ does currently without any issues, so I am confused as to why there is concern regarding ‘Future American Perimeter Trail’ and its style.
citrula (2024-07-05 16:29:02+00:00): That one should not be there either - I just saw this one as it was coming through my changeset QA feeds. Reviewing changesets is a volunteer effort, so not every change is able to be scrutinized - if you disagree with the response given here I encourage you to post on the community forums for more visibility
Pikachu25 (2024-07-05 16:41:58+00:00): citrula,

The Maple Swamp-Discovery Hill Connector was mapped on OSM by an official organization, the New England Mountain Bike Association. I would be careful with what you say regarding their mapping, as from my experience collaborating with them, they don’t take too kindly with their mapping being critiqued, especially from someone who doesn’t work with them. Aside from that, I have already changed ‘Future American Perimeter Trail’ to highway:path=proposed, as that is the best fit for right now. Also, you seem to be missing the point with proposed trails, if a proposed trail wasn’t allowed on OSM, why is there a tag that literally says ‘proposed’?
citrula (2024-07-05 17:04:45+00:00): Tags on OSM are free-form. proposed:* tag prefix wiki page says the following:

" Proposed features that are not visible on the ground should therefore only be mapped in exceptional cases and after a discussion with the relevant OSM community, lest they might be deleted for lack of verifiability."

In general, proposed features are only mapped when it is certain that it will be there in the future, and the path is well-defined. Whether or not the trail was mapped by an organization has little bearing on this.
Pikachu25 (2024-07-05 17:14:59+00:00): This is true, however,

A. This path will certainly be built in the future, as it is already in planning.

B. Portions of the mapped route, though not exact, follow well-defined deer and unofficial human-made trails through open forest. I chose not to share this detail before as I didn’t think it had any significance to the mapping of the trail itself, but since you brought up well-defined trails, I had no choice but to share it. If you look on Google Street View on Case Street at the northern end of Future American Perimeter Trail, you can just make out the deer trail as it heads in to Enders State Forest.
Pikachu25 (2024-07-05 17:21:01+00:00): Look on Google Street View at 52 Case Street and look to the southwest, you can just make out an opening which is the deer trail heading into the woods. You will also see in the back several fallen trees that cross the deer trail.
Pikachu25 (2024-07-05 17:35:48+00:00): The bottom third of Future American Perimeter Trail does not follow a well-defined trail, so I would be happy to remove that section based upon your description of ‘proposed trail’ rules above, but I know for a fact that the top two thirds follow a mix of deer trails and unsanctioned overgrown human-made trails.
Mashin (2024-07-05 22:19:02+00:00): To add more context to this, adding planned/proposed features to OSM is a bit controversial because:
a) those features don't represent current state
b) plans are often cancelled but those features typically stay in OSM for a long time until someone notices that they should be removed.

But anyway since you say that it will be done within a year and you are directly involved in the project, I personally don't see a problem having the trail mapped (tagged as proposed/planned).
Pikachu25 (2024-07-05 22:28:01+00:00): Thanks Mashin,

I can promise you that if it does not get built within 1 year from now, I will personally delete it the day of, but I do expect it to be built within one year.
felipeeugenio (2024-11-29 22:53:15+00:00): Hola. por favor no cambiar clasificaciones de caminos sin consultar a la comunidad. Gracias
segubi (2024-10-28 11:57:37+00:00): Du hast hier in Hildburghausen eine Routenführung des Werretalradwegs, die bis zum Changeset 115181287 von 2021 (IdleGandalf) schon einmal vorhanden war, als 2. Variante eingefügt. Die Quelle "Bing Maps" paßt dazu aber nicht. Die Routenrelation soll die Ausschilderung "on the ground" wiedergeben. Ist vor Ort tatsächlich eine Aufsplittung der Route ausgeschildert? Nur dann sollte man das so lassen (und vielleicht in der Relation als note kommentieren, damit nicht bald der nächste anfragt...).
Fee2024 (2024-10-28 15:14:57+00:00): Die Route wurde irgendwann mal geändert, und verläuft nun offiziell durch die Innenstadt(Vorher praktisch daran vorbei).

Eingetragen ist die Route praktisch fast auf allen Karten noch falsch, habe deswegen die alte nicht gänzlich heraus genommen um nicht noch mehr Verwirrung zu stiften. 

In der Innenstadt rund um den (Markt) bin ich mir aber auch nicht zu 100% sicher wie genau der Verlauf ist. Sollte aber kaum aufgrund der Verkehrsführung alternativen geben. 

Die Alte Route geht praktisch über eine stark befahrene Bundesstraße und dann über einen Berg weg, anschließend durch das Industriegebiet. "Sehr sehenswert":P 

Wer das so damals eingetragen bzw. festgelegt hat, gehört gesteinigt. ;)

Wollte mit den ÖPNV verantwortlichen hier im Landkreis aber auch nochmal Telefonieren, und denke hoffentlich dann mal daran, noch mal Details zu erfragen.
segubi (2024-10-28 16:01:22+00:00): "um nicht noch mehr Verwirrung zu stiften" - tja, ich bin leicht zu verwirren, egal, wie viel Mühe man sich gibt ;-). Ich glaube aber, - sofern die Ausschilderung vor Ort damit übereinstimmt, würde ich das so eintragen, wie Du das beschreibst, und entsprechend kommentieren. Die Frage die sich dann allerdings anschließt: Wo verläuft dann der Werra-Obermain-Radweg weiter? 
LG
Fee2024 (2024-10-28 16:47:15+00:00): Ich gehe mal stark davon aus das beide Radwege die selbige Route nehmen. Auf die Schilder achte ich aber zu selten. 

Die Ausschilderung sollte aber im großen und ganzen eigentlich dennoch passen, im Innenstadt Bereich bin ich aber unsicher, werde aber mal bei Gelegenheit darauf achten, und auch noch mal den Werra-Obermain-Radweg gegen prüfen. 

Im Grunde gibt es hier so viel zu tun um die Region mal zu aktualisieren, habe aber selbst mehr oder weniger allein zu wenig Motivation.

Mache ja immer schon mal Werbung für OSM, mal sehen ob es hilft. :)
Fee2024 (2024-10-28 16:57:34+00:00): Gerade noch mal geschaut 

laut hier:
https://www.thueringen.info/werra-obermain-radweg.html

beginnt der Werra-obermain Radweg in Hildburghausen mitten am Schlosspark, soweit müsste der von der Regelung zwar unbetroffen sein, ist aber auch gleich wieder so Typisch für die Region. 

Werden den Herrn Meyer vom Landratsamt mal darauf hinweisen. 

https://www.landkreis-hildburghausen.de/Aktuelles/index.php?object=tx,2903.1&ModID=9&FID=2902.270.1&mt_step=contact&to_id=2902.270.1&NavID=2902.17
segubi (2024-10-28 23:33:28+00:00): ... das schadet nie ;-).
Lumikeiju (2024-07-05 00:29:06+00:00): This changeset (Part 2) follows up on Changeset: 153565207 (Part 1).
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153565207
woodpeck_repair (2024-07-28 09:34:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 154512232 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism by tmapsme, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16504
PedroMTG13 (2024-07-05 18:00:10+00:00): Boas Razor, 
Grande partes destes ministérios não passou esta semana para o Campos XXI (ex sede da CGD)?
Não fará sentido atualizar com essa informação.
Cumprimentos
hvalentim (2024-07-06 17:19:09+00:00): Qual o interesse/necessidade de suprimir a geometria dos ministérios (MNE, MDN...) e reduzi-los a um nó individual? Há proveito em eliminar informação?
hvalentim (2024-08-14 10:10:05+00:00): Reparo ainda que deslocou a Comissão Nacional da UNESCO para local errado. Em que é que se baseou?
AgusQui (2024-11-17 23:05:33+00:00): no hace falta agregar restricciones de giro a carriles Metrobus, los mismos ya tienen restricciones que impiden el ruteo y giro
Manoj Kumar Pala (2024-11-20 17:06:23+00:00): Thank you for the valuable feedback. Please feel free to point out similar suggestions in future as well.
tastrax (2024-07-05 07:00:57+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, +61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
Harry1257 (2024-07-05 07:13:28+00:00): Thanks for pointing that out, will make sure to use the correct format from now on.