piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
jonrellim (2023-05-02 15:43:35+00:00): Hello,

I think this is incorrect, but correct me if I'm wrong. I'm not too familiar with German street signs, but the sign there says its a foot path with a white sign under it "[icon of a bicycle] und Anlieger frei. There are also several OSM bicycle route relations that pass over this path. 

I found an old picture from 2019, linked below. The same sign repeats a little ahead. Can you confirm this is still the case? 
https://i.imgur.com/zCcIzPr.jpg
dsmddn (2023-05-03 16:30:52+00:00): Hello jonrellim,
The section of Tieker Damm which is parallel to the street Dubbeleweg is closed for cyclists. The reason is that Tieker Damm is only about a meter wide at this section. At both ends of this section road signs and markings on the road direct cyclists to drive on Dubbeleweg instead of Tieker Damm. This was changed recently (last 2 years). Before the change this section of Tieker Damm was open to cyclists.
jonrellim (2023-05-03 16:35:15+00:00): Okay, then I wasn't aware of that change. Alas I had already changed it back, but I will update it again. Thanks for the information.
maraf24 (2023-07-23 18:37:46+00:00): Dlaczego tutaj nie ma prawidłowego komentarza ani podanego źródła?

Zestaw wycofałem. 

Poprzednie opisy jak i lokalizacje były prawidłowe.

Te nowe to pewnie z ... Google Maps? Google kłamie.
voltairovicz (2023-07-23 23:25:10+00:00): Literalnie byłem w tej miejscowości, bo mam w zwyczaju mapować wszelkie okolice, które odwiedzam i przez ktore przejeżdżam rowerem......
voltairovicz (2023-07-23 23:35:44+00:00): Zmiana wycofana bezpodstawnie. Zniknęły obszar zarosły i trawy. To jest źródłem zmian
https://polska-org.pl/3779661,Pierusza,Palac_Pierusza_dawny.html
Zdjęcia placu zgadzają się z ruiną widoczna na ortofotomapie tak samo. Ale pewnie forum kłamie :)
d_berger (2023-05-04 07:18:13+00:00): While turn restriction 15797752 might be debatable, turn restriction 15797753 is perfectly legal, and therefore wrong.

Please elaborate.
tastrax (2023-05-03 11:44:40+00:00): Hi Clarkington - best practice is not to join land use to roadways. In this instance it should be drawn at the fencelines to the paddocks, not the road.
nevw (2023-05-03 04:10:07+00:00): Hi, please don't extend farm areas to the roadway centreline
Thierry1030 (2023-05-02 12:57:39+00:00): Hallo,
Mag ik vragen wat de aanleiding is om dit bestaande olifantenpad op disused te zetten? Er zijn recente beschikbare beelden op mapillary ...
user_12845889 (2023-05-02 13:03:58+00:00): Omdat dit pad over privé-terrein loopt.
Thierry1030 (2023-05-02 13:12:07+00:00): mag ik u vriendelijk vragen om de info in de wiki te lezen? -> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property
Alvast bedankt
user_12845889 (2023-05-02 13:18:42+00:00): Waarom? In een vorige post op het stukje pad rechts hiervan suggereer je zelf om disused_highway:path te gebruiken. En da's wat ik hier volgens mij gedaan heb.
Thierry1030 (2023-05-02 13:26:18+00:00): als een pad effectief niet meer aanwezig is, kan inderdaad disused gebruikt wordt. Dat is hier op basis van de straatbeelden niet het geval. En wat het private aspect betreft: ik eie nergens een verkeersborden of een fysieke afsluiting die dit aangeven. Als dit wel zo is, graag dan fotomateriaal aanleveren ...
mga_geo (2023-05-08 04:31:04+00:00): Bonjour,
Pourquoi avoir modifié le type de la relation 8349759, un type route_master ne peut pas contenir des route_master.
Marc
Carboon33 (2023-05-08 12:45:18+00:00): Bonjour Marc,
Ouh la oui bien vu la coquille. J'ai édité sur id et je suis moins à l'aise qu'avec JOSM. Il faut effectivement mettre type=network sur la relation Transports Bordeaux Métropole (8349759)
d_berger (2023-05-04 07:09:47+00:00): Neither of those turn restrictions exist on the ground. While turn 15797910, might not be very clever, because of the green pedestrian traffic signal during the same phase, turn 15797911 is perfectly legal.

What's the source for your change?
gscholz (2023-05-03 06:02:44+00:00): Hi ugureker,
your recent activities have left behind several errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=31.58084&lat=40.72876&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1

As you may know, this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps. Can you please fix this?

You may also like to educate yourself about the usage of meaningful changeset comments:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2023-05-03 07:42:53+00:00): Hi flowipt,
this changeset has created several errors in the OSM database like self intersecting boundaries and a huge cafe building:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=21.17731&lat=42.64828&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=135614768

I have reverted it to fix those issues.

Please educate yourself about the basics of OSM before you continue:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide

Kind regards
Guido
confusedbuffalo (2023-10-05 18:39:14+00:00): Hello, I am only just noticing this now, but in this changeset (and possibly others as well) you appear to have deleted some of the narrow gauge railways here. For example, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/587233598/history
I know for a fact that this still exists, so can I ask if you surveyed the location when making this edit? Your changeset description does not give me any detail.
Hufkratzer (2023-05-02 20:50:53+00:00): Hi,
Doesn't https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1167956541 look more like a riding arena than like a riding centre? Riding arenas shlould be tagged leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian. There is a preset for them in iD. Compare https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dhorse_riding
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-02 10:57:43+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10862325172/history has fixme:type = amenity= ATM stand that was added in this edit
Have you tried to map ATM here?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-02 10:58:32+00:00): and if it was ATM then https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Datm would fit well
Syl (2023-05-02 16:40:20+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai enlevé le nom comme il s'agissait d'une description.
user_5359 (2023-05-03 09:15:10+00:00): Hello! Please have. look on https://www.osmp.org/relation/15798102/history. What is the mean of the tag "15798102" = "1850"?
Leonardo Gutierrez (2025-12-08 17:26:59+00:00): I apologize for not responding to this comment earlier. I'm now replying to previous comments that were left unattended.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-05-02 13:10:12+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1150804922

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
d_berger (2023-05-02 13:13:59+00:00): Please don't add temporary restrictions due to construction works. Also, it's not oneway for public transport.
eggie (2023-05-02 13:26:03+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Alle begin is moeilijk.. De witte plekken heb ik weer opgevuld met gras en het hondenuitlaatveld het hek laten volgen zoals op de luchtfoto.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Syl (2023-05-06 21:32:33+00:00): Bonjour, plusieurs chemins ont été créés en double, à la fois ici et là : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135620495
Pouvez-vous corriger ?
Pour les trouver rapidement c'est l'erreur "géométrie dupliquée" dans Osmose.
Al-Hun (2023-05-07 11:07:24+00:00): Bonjour, oui je sais il y a eu des problèmes avec l'éditeur qui a planté et ça m'a généré des doublons de différents types. J'en ai corrigé déjà certains mais comme je partais en weekend je n'ai pas eu le temps de finir. Dès mon retour, dans la semaine, je finirai de mettre ça au propre.
Al-Hun (2023-05-07 11:09:05+00:00): J'ai encore une ou deux sorties de prévues pour faire encore des relevés GPS sur la zone, qui est très intéressante.
Jan Olieslagers (2023-05-03 09:49:18+00:00): What is the runway used for? It seems very shortish for aeroplane use, perhaps powered parachutes or such?
20180911 (2023-05-04 06:38:21+00:00): This rubway ends in front of a hut that should be seen on aerial imagery. There was a small 1 or 2 seat airplane at one end, perhaps 5 to 7 metres in length.
gscholz (2023-05-03 06:02:38+00:00): Hi ugureker,
your recent activities have left behind several errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=31.58084&lat=40.72876&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1

As you may know, this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps. Can you please fix this?

You may also like to educate yourself about the usage of meaningful changeset comments:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2023-05-05 08:20:43+00:00): Hi ugureker,
these errors still exist, can I get your feedback here?
Guido
NGL-engel (2025-08-20 21:22:44+00:00): Hallo Abq,
   im Zuge meiner Urlaubsplanung bin ich auf diesen Pfad gestoßen, der mit „access=no” gekennzeichnet ist. Du hast ihn als „durchgängig begehbaren Weg mit Hinweisschildern (‚Wegende‘)” beschrieben. Da ich die Situation vor Ort noch nicht kenne, sieht es für mich ein wenig wie vorauseilender Gehorsam aus. Ich habe mir gerade einen GPS-Track von der offiziellen Seite des Tourismusverbandes heruntergeladen. Siehe https://www.hochschwarzwald.de/touren/durch-den-mystischen-bannwald-zum-zweribach-wasserfall-f2e5a0cf88. Dort wird ein Stück des Weges genutzt.
Wenn dort kein Schild „Durchgang verboten” o. Ä. steht, müsste das Durchwandern dann nicht erlaubt sein? Zumindest wäre das in meiner Heimat Niedersachsen so. Leider sagt mir auch die „Bannwaldverordnung” (die es in Niedersachsen unter dieser Bezeichnung nicht gibt) nichts.
Wenn man den Weg zwar betreten, aber nicht durchlaufen soll, wäre dann „access=destination” nicht sinnvoller?
Es wäre nett, wenn du dir die Stelle noch einmal anschauen könntest.
Gruß, ngl-engel
*abq* (2025-08-21 14:44:16+00:00): Ja, die Beschilderung ist leider nicht ganz eindeutig. Die Bsnnwald verordnungen im Bereich RP Freiburg erlauben in der Regel nur das Betreten markierter Wanderwege. Von daher würde ich am Tagging nix ändern wollen. Was du draus machst für deine Wanderung ist ja eine ganz andere Sache... :-)

Viele Grüße, Reiner
NGL-engel (2025-08-25 19:38:40+00:00): Danke
Andere Bundesländer = andere Vorschriften ;-)
Wie du es schreibst scheint es Hand und Fuß zu haben. Danke für Deine nette Antwort, 
Gruß Angela
tolioalessandro (2023-06-04 20:27:21+00:00): Ciao alessandrocarmeli,

le strade che hai trasformato in "secondary" con la tua modifica connettono una strada di livello "trunk" con una di livello "primary". Erano classificate come "primary" perchè utilizzate dal traffico della "primary" per raggiungere la "trunk".

In generale, gli svincoli e le relative strade di raccordo tra 2 arterie di livello diverso non possono di livello inferiore alla minore tra le 2 arterie connesse. Questo perchè la rete formata dalle strade di ogni livello deve essere indipendente dalle strade dei livelli inferiori e dev'essere connessa a quelle di livello superiore. Quindi, tornando al nostro caso, una "primary" non può appoggiarsi ad una "secondary" per connettersi ad una strada di livello superiore, la "motorway".

Ti chiedo pertanto di ripristinare la classificazione come la hai trovata.

Se hai dubbi sulla classificazione delle strade che incontri, ti consiglio di commentare le modifiche degli editor che sono passati prima di te chiedendo spiegazioni delle loro scelte, anzichè procedere a massicce modifiche della rete come vedo che hai fatto non solo qui a Bassano del Grappa ma in generale tutto il nord est.

Grazie del tempo che dedichi al miglioramento delle mappe di OpenStreetMap.

Per ulteriori informazioni o delucidazioni non esitare a contattarmi.

A presto,

Alessandro
eggie (2023-05-02 14:18:41+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
docjay (2023-05-02 13:59:58+00:00): Area is vehicle-focused, used for bus turn around and taxis or other car stops. Traffic is freeform without designated lanes, so keeping area=yes. To accommodate pedestrians, access is now flagged for foot and bicycle, plus a linking footway from the steps to the routable service highway.
user_5359 (2023-05-03 06:20:35+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don‘t add building to the property, add the key only to existing building. Also the name of the building isn‘t build from the street name and the house number.
xDeamon (2023-05-29 09:18:03+00:00): Ciao, vorrei capire cosa ti ha spinto a declassare da "trunk" a "primary" la tangenziale est di Bassano, quando è totalmente erronea come modifica, basta che ti leggi la wiki per scoprirlo: wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Tag:highway%3Dtrunk, in caso ti risparmio il disturbo: "Sono così classificate le strade extraurbane principali (classificazione tecnica: tipo B) e le strade extraurbane secondarie (classificazione tecnica: tipo C) che non presentino incroci a raso, abbiano accessi e uscite mediati da corsie di accelerazione/decelerazione e presentino il cartello di "strada riservata ai veicoli a motore" a inizio e fine e agli ingressi intermedi."
Quindi ok che non è tecnicamente una superstrada (tipo B), ma è pur sempre una strada a scorrimento veloce dotata di svincoli sfalsati (tipo  C). Ti invito quindi a ripristinare la tua modifica il prima possibile, grazie.
alessandrocarmeli (2023-05-29 21:08:42+00:00): Risposto in privato
wkdgs (2023-05-02 15:04:08+00:00): Bist du sicher? Laut Mapillary war das im Februar nur für LKWs eine Anliegerstraße, nicht für PKWs. Das Tagging wäre mit "hgv=destination" also richtig gewesen und "motor_vehicle=destination" wäre hier falsch.

Siehe: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=484723746371075&lat=48.94038828477&lng=9.1850604803607&z=17&focus=photo&x=0.5160306556160213&y=0.4702570259683109&zoom=0.3468516501443999
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135618634
Yahatix (2023-05-02 15:13:17+00:00): Mh kann sein. Aber ab hier https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=135616248944369&lat=48.941515382329&lng=9.1869631704819&z=17&focus=photo&x=0.5093816578116511&y=0.43587533743438656&zoom=0
Darf man als pkw fahrer auf jeden fall nicht mehr weiter. Da hat mich die Polizei schon mal angehalten.
wkdgs (2023-05-02 15:18:36+00:00): Ja, da muss es dann nochmal anders gemappt. werden. Sieht aus wie eine Fahrradstraße. Das wäre dann das hier:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:bicycle_road
pbnoxious (2023-05-05 09:36:00+00:00): Nur als kurzer Kommentar für die Zukunft: Für unterirdische Kabel (insofern man sie überhaupt einträgt, weil oft schlecht verifizierbar) kann man "location=underground" und "layer=-1" hinzufügen, hab das für das von dir hier eingetragene ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1167973657 ) mal direkt gemacht
wireguy (2023-05-02 15:28:42+00:00): Dark, 
I don't think the schilke lane section is signed 650 anymore.  It's a dead end, residential.
thedarkcave215 (2023-05-02 17:03:15+00:00): Ah, gotcha. I changed it, thanks for letting me know.
literan (2023-05-02 18:56:53+00:00): "Пресса" это не название
Hufkratzer (2023-05-02 21:06:38+00:00): Hi,
Why did you tag https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1167974993 leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian (= riding arena) and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1167974995 leisure=horse_riding (riding centre)? I would have tagged both as arenas (leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian), and also these older ones:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/903843079
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/903843083
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/903843084

Compare https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dhorse_riding
NorthCrab_upload (2023-05-02 15:20:17+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"plac Muzealny":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/371540800
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/372690115
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/372690117
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/372690119
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/372690136

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
nitro_expander (2023-05-06 04:05:51+00:00): nice . I was about to make the same edit after seeing this rd as secondary in OsmAnd ;) 
Happy to see the area is actively mapped :)
Jbah (2024-02-14 23:17:21+00:00): Moin, sind die von dir in diesem Changeset eingefuehrten Relationen tatsaechlich so vor Ort ausgeschildert? Sonst sollten sich ja diese aus den access Tags erschliessen bzw stimmen so ja nicht.
aush01 (2024-02-15 20:04:28+00:00): Die (verbotenen) Relationen sind so ausgeschildert bzw. durch die Fahrstreifenbegrenzung angeordnet. 
Der Zugang aus anderen Richtungen ist erlaubt.
Jbah (2024-02-15 20:15:59+00:00): Alles klar, danke für dein Feedback.
literan (2023-05-02 18:54:37+00:00): > sidewalk:both=separate

ты уверен, что там тротуары с обеих сторон от каждого направления движения?
Bobropiton (2023-05-02 20:42:00+00:00): Я прям ждал, что ты напишешь)
Там и троллейбусные провода с одной стороны только :)
Исправлено
literan (2023-05-02 21:00:26+00:00): 8-)
ToniE (2023-05-03 09:24:01+00:00): Hi Natasha,

using iD is not a good choice when dealing with relations. Here, some ways have been split, causing some troubles with bus relations

Kindly see the effect @ 

https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/DE/NI/DE-NI-VOS-Analysis.html#bus_N1

https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/DE/NI/DE-NI-VOS-Analysis.html#bus_N18

https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/DE/NI/DE-NI-VOS-Analysis.html#bus_515

https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/DE/NI/DE-NI-VOS-Analysis.html#bus_533

and so on, where PTNA complains about 2 things:

- relation now has gaps (Lücken), has x segments

- route follows a oneway ways  (Einbahnstraßen) in wrong direction (Richtung)

I suggest using JOSM for further (professional) edits.
It complains about gaps before the upload of changed data.
PTNA is currently the only QA tool checking for oneway ways being used in wrong direction.

Of course, JOSM has some learning curve but it is worth trying for day by day edits.

Regards
Toni (he)
Natasha_Zhovner (2023-05-03 13:33:22+00:00): Hi Toni!
Yes, I see a problem in bus relations. The geometry was not made by me, but I corrected the bus relations (#1, #515, #533). I attach the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135660931 . But I didnt see the bus relation №18.
ToniE (2023-05-03 13:49:15+00:00): Hi Natasha!
Thanks! I guess, you've made several edits in that area and n°18 was probably touched by another CS.
ivanbranco (2023-05-02 16:53:46+00:00): Ciao, per gli import ci sono delle guidelines da seguire: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Import/Guidelines

Almeno tre diversi utenti hanno provato a contattarti in cinque differenti gruppi di modifiche, li hai letti? https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=18423565
Pradella Sistemi Srl (2023-05-30 09:10:34+00:00): Buongiorno Ivan,
grazie per le segnalazioni. Abbiamo preso in mano da poco l'attività di censimento delle nostre colonnine di ricarica. Stiamo prendendo in considerazione i vostri commenti per rispettare le linee guida.
Jan Olieslagers (2023-05-03 09:20:03+00:00): Please stop removing the names from disused aerodromes. This is valuable and verifiable information; its wilful removal is vandalism, or close. Please stop.
Rom1 (2023-05-03 09:43:39+00:00): Hi, no it's not vandalism. I use old_name instead.
Jan Olieslagers (2023-05-03 09:46:21+00:00): Why?
Rom1 (2023-05-03 09:50:31+00:00): Because it's about old aerodromes.
Jan Olieslagers (2023-05-03 09:54:03+00:00): The aerodrome may be old, that does not alter the name. You are really obscuring information, and you seem to think it is the right thing to do.
Rom1 (2023-05-03 10:02:19+00:00): For example this one https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/347254856/history near where I live, the tag old_name is used since 3 years. And recently you moved to name=Anc. BA136 Toul-Rosières It's even not the right name. Let me ask the french community on https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/
Rom1 (2023-05-03 19:23:19+00:00): So I have changed old_name to name (see https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/question-de-nommage-pour-objets-en-disused-ou-abandonned/14636)
Hope it's good for you now. Thanks
Jan Olieslagers (2023-05-03 21:57:01+00:00): Merci
multimodaal (2023-05-05 20:46:49+00:00): Bedankt voor het verbeteren van de landuse hier! 
Wilde er net naar kijken omdat ik bij het varen merkte dat dat driehoekje van water in open verbinding staat met de vaart, maar je was me voor (-:
Palolo (2023-05-05 16:44:32+00:00): Thank you for your first contribution to OSM, buildings should be traced accurately with square corners. Use the q key please. Thank you.
felipeeugenio (2023-05-03 20:55:09+00:00): Estimado. buena edición.
Pero es fácil equivocarse mirando las fotos satelitales.
una recomendación: en el nodo final de la calle que se acaba, agregar noexit=yes
De ese modo otro mapero que mire la escena no se va a ver tentado de unirlas pensando que se trata de un error.
Otra cosa es que los caminos se toquen y que haya una reja. Es ese el caso?
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135622446
trial (2024-12-28 22:08:07+00:00): foot=no n'a pas de sens ici, c'est le cas de tous les trunk, inutile de le préciser.
matheusgomesms-import (2023-05-02 17:28:06+00:00): Importação de edifícios #ImportPMFBuildings
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-06-04 11:42:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 136929482 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some fantasy mapping in Greece.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7170
Palolo (2023-05-05 16:18:33+00:00): Thank you for the help mapping. Please make the building polygons orthogonal by using the q key.
Langlaeufer (2023-05-02 20:47:52+00:00): Bitte bei 30er Zonen nicht "Ein Schild" sondern "ist innerhalb einer Tempo 30er Zone" angeben.
Grüße Langläufer
Langlaeufer (2023-05-02 20:37:46+00:00): Hallo Glitterlaw,
bei einer Tempo30 Zone bitte nicht "Schild" sondern Zone als Quelle für die Geschwindigkeit angeben.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135623505
Langlaeufer (2023-05-02 20:48:45+00:00): sorry, war der falsche Änderungssatz.
avinet_ua (2023-05-02 16:26:12+00:00): added "wikipedia" tag copied from "wikipedia:uk"
avinet_ua (2023-05-02 16:26:28+00:00): added "wikipedia" tag copied from "wikipedia:uk" with "uk:" prefix