piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
archie (2024-07-03 17:56:18+00:00): Noll (0) gaps. Snyggt!
Dodko (2026-03-09 11:16:09+00:00): Namiesto shelter_type=shopping_cart by sa skôr hodilo amenity=trolley_bay

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sk:Tag:shelter_type%3Dshopping_cart
Marian Mika (2026-03-09 12:15:33+00:00): Ahoj, vďaka za info. Ak si dobre pamätám, tak som tie prístrešky pre nákupné vozíky odkukal asi v mape v Košiciach. Vtedy to bol asi ešte používaný tag. Pozerám, že shelter_type=shopping_cart bol zamietnutý v septembri 2025 a je zaň náhrada. Vo Zvolene to opravím na aktuálne tagovanie, len by to chcelo prehľadať celú SR, keďže aj ja som to "odkukal" na inom mieste republiky.
LockOnGuy (2024-07-02 15:35:34+00:00): Hello Usama Alani, and welcome to OSM!     
May we know why did you delete the one place please?     
Regards.
hatul (2025-09-03 19:28:39+00:00): תוכל בבקשה לסדר?
כי אני רואה שיש שני סינגלים פיראטיים.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/159796728
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/269255538

הם נפרדים? לכל אחד יש שם?
rempshaener (2025-02-02 11:55:03+00:00): Hallo,
ich denke, hier ist was schief gelaufen.
Ist hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/267299118 tatsächlich immer noch (bzw. neu) die Kita Pfauenland? Und die Adresse ist die eines Wohnhauses auf der gegenüberliegenden Straßenseite - das soll doch sicher auch nicht so sein?
Viele Grüße
dzamper (2024-07-02 15:35:47+00:00): Why did you remove the junction=roundabout tag from this roundabout?
dzamper (2024-07-03 17:07:28+00:00): I reverted this changeset in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153511521
Flamen_Sru (2024-07-04 11:19:11+00:00): Hi  dzamper, 
Thank you for reverting the changeset. 
According to OSM wiki I’ve removed the roundabout tag for this feature as I couldn’t see any stop or yield signs through resources.
omeroseed (2024-07-03 18:51:56+00:00): inşaatı başlamamış ve kesin olarak yapılıp yapılmayacağı belli olmayan yolu neye istinaden ekliyorsunuz, projeyle alakayı gelişmeyi belirtebilir misiniz?
NeisBot (2024-07-02 13:00:23+00:00): Hi micseanmon, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 83% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 65 building(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=153456010
Filip009 (2025-12-02 15:24:02+00:00): Ahoj, tvoje je presnejšie?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1957665129
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11445123252
*Martin* (2025-12-03 07:29:23+00:00): opravene
Rom1 (2024-07-02 19:32:33+00:00): Pour info, j'ai retiré à nouveau l'adjectif "rural" du nom du chemin. "rural" n'est qu'une description et c'est l'attribut ref=CR qui caractérise le type de chemin. Voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Names#Les_noms_ne_sont_pas_des_descriptions Merci.
Kovoschiz (2024-07-03 06:38:16+00:00): Please don't add multiple names to `name=` .  `alt_name=` should be followed. Furthermore, they should have a `route=` created, not be added as `name=` .
Jeremy Liong (2024-07-04 14:02:00+00:00): Those are not multiple names.  Those are the official complete names.  See this photo (https://i.imgur.com/tJWG9AO.jpg) taken a couple of days ago.
Kovoschiz (2024-07-05 03:42:59+00:00): Please don't blindly follow map labels and sign titles directly. They can be made in different formats for presentation and viewing. 
Top-right mentions them separately. It's very clear it means different sections. Furthermore, the plural "trails" suggests it is a system, not a single `route=` . 
Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Multiple_names and  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Walking_Routes
Kovoschiz (2024-07-05 08:47:57+00:00): https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=11216261
Jeremy Liong (2024-07-06 14:08:47+00:00): Understood, I agreed with what you said.
streetsurvma (2024-07-05 14:41:18+00:00): Hi Waffl.  The area Barker road sits on is not private land according to town property map.  While overgrown near the golf course in Boxford, it's not inaccessible (I ran it too - including the overgrown part), so I'd like to go and edit it back.  Thanks.
streetsurvma (2024-07-05 14:44:47+00:00): PS:  I made the overgrown part a path on the re-edit.  Thanks.
waffl (2024-07-05 15:01:21+00:00): Hi, thanks for letting me know it is accessible. On the boxford side near the golf course it does have a "private property no trespassing sign" though. Perhaps the stretch between the golf course and halfway to the power lines is private and then the other half is public trails on the Andover side?
Gescriey (2024-07-05 15:59:00+00:00): yes it is a public road from the andover side, though not open to public motor vehicles
streetsurvma (2024-07-05 18:27:39+00:00): No problem waffl.  Boxford's town GIS map actually shows Barker even more clearly as a public roadway.  Perhaps the golf course put up that sign and allowed it to get overgrown too, to keep people out.  Its basically a fire access road, so the land-track designation is right for that.  Thanks.
julcnx (2024-07-03 02:35:27+00:00): Hey hypamaps, Thanks for your contributions! Your changeset got flagged as suspicious. I was curious why you deleted all the existing footways to recreate them. The new ones don't line up with GPS traces like the Strava Heatmap. Also, are the footways owned, maintained, and signed with the name "Rayavadee Footpath Network"?

I suggest checking out the Thailand wiki link I sent earlier and asking on the discourse forum if you're unsure about how to tag certain things. Happy mapping! Julien
BCNorwich (2024-07-08 19:14:27+00:00): Hi  julcnx,  This person has some history of adding fiction, they added similar footpaths in the UK which have been reverted. 

Regards Bernard.
hypamaps (2024-07-08 19:19:27+00:00): Hi Bernard. Thank you for your input. Having only recently joined the platform, I'm keen to ensure that I don't make any errors - so, if I make any, I would prefer if they were pointed out at the time, and suggestions made so that I can avoid any similar errors in future.

I assure you that I don't have a "history of adding fiction"... If you can please message me to let me know where, when and how I made these mistakes I will happily review my workflows to make sure that I don't repeat the same mistakes again.

Thank you, again, for your input and I look forward to hearing from you shortly, with productive and helpful advice on how best I can proceed in future.

Kind regards,
BCNorwich (2024-07-09 05:51:13+00:00): Hi hypamaps, 

Please look back to your changeset:- https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153295971

I could find no evidence of these 24 new paths nor their name. There was no reference that I could find on the Guilfest website. Further these paths in part were self intersecting and often the paths crossed with no joining node. So I reverted the changeset.

I apologise that the comment I attempted to make on that changeset did not go through. 

Features made to OSM must be verifiable as per the advice given at:- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Verifiability

Regards Bernard
hypamaps (2024-07-09 06:16:23+00:00): Hi Bernard. Thank you for your response and productive input. 

You’re quite right, those paths were placed to aid Guilfest visitors with navigating the festival and I actually intended to place them momentarily, but totally forgot to delete them. Apologies for adding to your workflow unnecessarily. 

Thank you again for your insight. Much appreciate it. 

🙏
user_8655426 (2024-07-03 10:15:41+00:00): 通報済み。
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/cosmog/history

school -> park
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/508330124
bxl-forever (2024-07-02 13:55:03+00:00): Hello,

Please do not retrace building outlines on (distorted) aerial imagery.

Only UrbisAdm for buildings in Brussels, thanks.
bemapper (2024-07-02 18:39:34+00:00): I'm familiar with handling the distortions and anchoring the positions but in this case indeed URBIS seems to be among the best, thank you for the note - finalised in #153471503
ivanbranco (2024-07-02 15:46:53+00:00): Hi casperonbike,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12029130784

what's this element? it only has a name=HGW tag
Lirum Larum (2024-07-03 07:23:54+00:00): I guess they meant this: https://www.hgw-wohnen.ch/
Not sure how to tag correctly.
casperonbike (2024-07-03 09:01:48+00:00): Yes it's HGW Wohnen. It was a missclick on my changeset. The changes on HGW is not finished yet.
NeisBot (2024-07-02 14:02:24+00:00): Hi micseanmon, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 92% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 1 building(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=153458614
MichS (2024-07-02 17:46:36+00:00): Um welches Tiergehege handelt es sich bitte?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12029151910#map=17/49.45087/7.43855&layers=D
Wanderer_und_Radfahrer_Anton (2024-07-03 11:30:19+00:00): Hallo MichS,

bei Ehweiler auf diesen zwei Weiden sind überwiegend im Sommer Rinder (Highland Rinder) von einem Bauern aus Ehweiler untergebracht. Von einer vertrauenswürdigen Quelle weiß ich sogar, dass die Rinder zur Zeit wieder dort sind.
Aufgrund dessen hatte ich zwei Weiden/Wiesen hinzugefügt mit dem Namen „Rinder“.

Als dies gelöscht war, da dies wohl aus irgendeinen Grund falsch war, dachte ich man könne dies als Tiergehege kennzeichnen aber anscheinend ist dies auch falsch?!

Ich denke, dass genau solche Informationen (hier das Rindergehege) etwas aussagekräftiges ist für eine gute Karte (OSM) mit genauen Informationen und nicht Informationen vorenthalten werden.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Anton
MichS (2024-07-03 13:06:04+00:00): Hallo,

bei den attraction=animal sollte dann beachtet werden, ob die Tiere nur temporär zu sehen sind, z.B. jahreszeitlich, ob eine Infotafel aufgestellt wurde. Wenn die Tiere dann weg sind gehört das attraction auch entfernt. Ein tourism=attraction sollt ein dauerhaftes Objekt, etwa ein ND oder ein Ereignis sein.

Eine Bitte, halten sie einen CS auf ein kleineres Gebiet beschränkt. Besser dann zwei CS.

Der name tag ist nur für Eingennamen, nicht für Beschreibungen, das haben sie im wiki höchst wahrscheinlich gelesen.

MFG
Znaika (2024-08-22 17:54:43+00:00): 58 gibt es nicht. Es ist 60
Ropino (2024-08-22 18:52:40+00:00): Korrigiert
miluethi (2024-07-02 16:04:52+00:00): Hi MarguiSF,

I noticed that your building shape is far bigger than shown on the aerial imagery. Please narrow down your shapes to match exactly the image.

Also please square out your building shape by pressing the "Q" key. 99% of the buildings in Nicaragua are squared out.
miluethi (2024-07-03 00:55:37+00:00): Jem,

Please square out all buildings by pressing the "Q" key.

Thank you.
Sylabowy Kot (2025-08-07 09:00:14+00:00): Zmiana wycofana: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170094909

Obiekty nadal istnieją. Do zmiany ich dostępność, bo teren jest ogrodzony, a wokół niego pełno aut.
mavl (2024-07-02 16:04:16+00:00): Здравствуйте. Напишите, пожалуйста, в каком источнике данных вы нашли название "улица Московский Тракт"?
ЧерНика3 (2024-07-02 21:01:42+00:00): Здравствуйте. Такая улица указана в задании  Ozon. ( Россия, Тюмень, улица Московский Тракт, 129)  Не знаю можно ли прикрепить скрин с заданием.
mavl (2024-07-03 02:57:49+00:00): Очень странно. Сообщите, пожалуйста, Озону, что в Тюмени нет улицы "улица Московский Тракт". Есть улица " Московский тракт".
ЧерНика3 (2024-07-03 14:49:16+00:00): Сообщение  передала.
mavl (2024-07-03 15:43:48+00:00): Спасибо.
literan (2024-07-02 16:51:14+00:00): это не название
Sylabowy Kot (2025-08-07 08:59:18+00:00): Trochę się zapędziłeś tu i tutaj: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153460800 
Wiata nadal stoi, a pod nią masa aut. Zdjęcie w tym poście temu dowodzi: https://www.skyscrapercity.com/posts/194221544/

Wycofałem obydwa: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170094909
Frans S (2024-07-02 15:02:17+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
A: buildings not accurate drawn.
C: Cluster buildings.
D: Connected node of building to highway
H: Incorporated a yard.

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153461605
Tosenbo (2025-10-30 09:55:30+00:00): Bonjour je met ce commentaire pour vous informer qu'il existe le tag cycleway=link (ainsi que footway=link) qui remplit la fonction pour laquelle vous aviez utiliser ce chemin
Mathias_ADAV (2025-11-26 09:46:56+00:00): Merci je n'avais pas en tête ce tag !
Vladimir Camo (2025-02-19 17:04:20+00:00): Zdravím, neviem aký zámer mal táto zmena ale začali sa nám vďaka nej miesto miest zobrazovať na mape okresy. To nieje správne ak zadávate napr. Žilinu alebo Liptovský Mikuláš. žiadam o revert týchto zmien.
*Martin* (2025-02-20 06:24:51+00:00): Ahoj. Máte pravdu, moja zmena nebola správna a práve som ju vrátil späť. Ospravedlňujem sa za komplikácie.
Vladimir Camo (2025-02-20 08:30:02+00:00): Nebola tma ešte nejaká iné zmena ktorá by to mohla ovplyvniť lebo stále dostávame ako výsledok requestu okres miesto mesta.
*Martin* (2025-02-20 08:33:21+00:00): zmena v openstreetmap sa neprejavi hned na vsetkych miestach. skuste pockat par dni.
Vladimir Camo (2025-02-21 14:13:08+00:00): Už je to v poriadku. Ďakujem za spoluprácu.
Tomas_J (2024-07-08 05:03:08+00:00): Ahoj.  Pre zbúranu budovu poži predponu životného cyklu demolished:building=yes podľa: 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:demolished:*
DD1GJ (2024-07-03 06:53:17+00:00): Hallo Weperpaula, herzlichen Dank fü deine Ortskenntnisse. Allerdings bringt das Löschen der Trampelpfade nichts, da sie auf den Luftbildern deutlich sichtbar sind und früher oder später wieder eingetragen werden. Ich habe daher die Löschungen rückgängig gemacht und die Trampelpfade in abandoned:highway geändert. In der Karte werden sie dadurch nicht mehr angezeigt, aber in Editor dienen sie mit dem Kommentar als deutliche Warnung, sie nochmal zu erfassen.

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=153487242

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lebenszyklus-Pr%C3%A4fix

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Viele Grüße, Joachim
Weperpaula (2024-07-03 19:16:15+00:00): Hey Joachim! Danke für diese wirklich gute Lösung. Wir stehen als Gemeinde im engen Kontakt mit den Niedersächsischen Landesforsten, die sich ebenfalls sehr darüber freuen werden, wenn die Trampelpfade nicht mehr in den Karten erscheinen. Zumal es einen parallel verlaufenden schönen Wanderweg gibt. Danke!
sianying (2024-07-02 15:44:27+00:00): nice
arjunaraoc (2024-07-03 00:43:04+00:00): Hello Pranay, I cleaned up your edit. Please check https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153480519#map=16/17.4613/79.2633
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153463891
arjunaraoc (2024-07-03 03:24:24+00:00): Further to my earlier comment, the name should reflect what is written on the signboard of the place. I found a old photograph on google https://www.google.com/maps/place/Mothkur+Bus+Stand/@17.4653844,79.2653194,3a,75y,90t/data=!3m8!1e2!3m6!1sAF1QipNiVXfwyXSriS47Bg4CJtAf3sPk0wNsYplugWKs!2e10!3e12!6shttps:%2F%2Flh5.googleusercontent.com%2Fp%2FAF1QipNiVXfwyXSriS47Bg4CJtAf3sPk0wNsYplugWKs%3Dw203-h152-k-no!7i4128!8i3096!4m13!1m2!2m1!1s+BUS+STAND+,+Motkur!3m9!1s0x3bcb49367bff5829:0x34fc738a589565f8!8m2!3d17.4653844!4d79.2653194!10e5!14m1!1BCgIgAQ!15sChJCVVMgU1RBTkQgLCBNb3RrdXKSAQtidXNfc3RhdGlvbuABAA!16s%2Fg%2F1tdjvgq3?entry=ttu  You can use any latest photograph to update.
arjunaraoc (2024-07-03 03:25:39+00:00): You can add commonly used names such  as మోత్కూర్ బస్ స్టేషన్ for alt_name tag.
5m4u9 (2024-07-02 18:22:33+00:00): Hola, esos nombres no son útiles para el mapa ni para los usuarios.
sianying (2024-07-02 15:51:23+00:00): nicee
Dimitar155 (2024-07-03 07:51:44+00:00): Благодаря за промяната! Само ще ви помоля да не закачете спирките с тротоарите. По-добре е да бъдат "летящи" точки между линията за тротоара и линията за пътя. По този начин ще бъде по-лесно да се премести спирката, ако пак се наложи. Ако имате някакви въпроси, оставам на разположение.

Поздрави, Митко
britischer_elch (2024-07-02 17:59:14+00:00): Dankeschön!
BCNorwich (2024-07-03 06:51:04+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've removed your new road as it duplicated the line of an existing highway. If a feature needs correcting please correct any existing feature.

Regards Bernard.
Andrea Musuruane (2024-07-03 13:48:22+00:00): Ciao. surface=unpaved indica solo che la superficie non e' pavimentata. E' una indicazione abbastanza imprecisa che sarebbe meglio dettagliare. Anche il ground che c'era prima e' abbastanza impreciso. Qui la spiegazione dei diversi valori: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:surface?uselang=it Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153464432
Jacopo Nasi (2024-07-04 13:39:42+00:00): Ciao Andrea, adesso è marcato come STERRATO. Così è più corretto?
Jacopo Nasi (2024-07-04 13:43:40+00:00): Ho corretto con la definizione corretta.
Andrea Musuruane (2024-07-17 08:59:32+00:00): Ciao. Perdona il ritardo. Ora mi sembra vada bene, grazie.
dadavid (2024-07-02 23:37:22+00:00): Hi Weperpaula, 

Danke dir für den Edit, kurze Frage dazu: 

wie ist denn width=0 gemeint? 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/188032907

Viele Grüße 

David
dadavid (2025-05-04 02:17:33+00:00): entfernt
Tomas_J (2024-07-08 04:54:17+00:00): Ahoj.  Ak sú používané dva názvy (Aljaška , Búdy), tak druhý názov nemaž, ale použi alt_name.
bubozvihorlatu (2024-07-08 19:15:39+00:00): Ahoj Tomas.
Zmazanie je vážny zásah, ale ten kto zasahuje do mapy, môže si názvy-pomenovania vymýšľať?
Možno je Aljaška používané nejakou partiou, alebo menšou komunitou turistov, bikerov. To ale neznamená, že sa takto toto miesto nazýva, preto trvám na tom, že to nie je názov.
Ale žiaľ tiež platí: Stokrát opakovaná lož sa stáva pravdou.
Bubo
Tomas_J (2024-07-08 21:15:03+00:00): Názov v alt_name by mal tiež byť všeobecne známy , spýtal som sa autora odkiaľ ho má : 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/85326205#map=15/48.9095/22.1257

Je dobré komunikovať, ak nie je istota. Každopádne si dal k svojmu change setu žiadosť o vyjadrenie/koment , takto toto je vyjadrenie za mňa.
bubozvihorlatu (2024-07-09 18:02:44+00:00): Ahoj Tomas. Ďakujem, že si vstúpil do diskusie. Predpokladám, že si technicky zdatný. Ja sa tu orientujem veľmi ťažko. Históriu tohoto miesta poznám, preto sa to snažím napraviť. Tiež to nie je jazero, ale to som už opravil. Sú tam možnosti, len treba vybrať tú správnu. Aj pri názve sú možnosti odkiaľ pochádzajú. Bubo
Tomas_J (2024-07-10 06:27:53+00:00): Uvidíme, či odpíše  VVVadmin. Alternatívny názov by nemal byť používaný iba úzkou skupinou ľudí. V name by malo byť oficiálne pomenovanie (uvedené v štátnom registri), v alt_name môže potom byť hocičo pod čím je objekt známy. Alt_name väčšina máp nezobrazuje, ale môže sa podľa neho napr. dát vyhľadávať, takže ak sa alternatívny názov používa, je užitočné aby v databáze boli oba.
Rom1 (2024-07-02 19:26:50+00:00): J'ai annulé ces modifications. Ce n'est pas une erreur (bien qu'iD le signale) que les noeuds des commerces soient positionnés sur le contour d'un bâtiment. Merci.
Yunan973 (2024-07-06 17:47:53+00:00): Bonjour,

Et vous avez vu cela où ? C'est une spécialité lorraine ?

Merci de lire le wiki avant vos prochaines modifications : 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:amenity%3Drestaurant
ou
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:amenity%3Dcafe
ou
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:shop%3Dclothes

Et vous faites comment pour les centres commerciaux où il y a 20 ou 30 boutiques dispersées dans un bâtiment comme ici par exemple https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1794425618#map=19/4.92567/-52.28810 ? Vous créez 30 points au niveau de la porte d'entrée principale du centre ? Vous les répartissez (au feeling) sur les différentes portes d'entrée ?

Sachant que mettre les boutiques à l'intérieur des bâtiments est correct, vous n'avez pas l'impression d'avoir perdu votre temps ?

Merci en tout cas d'avoir remis le bon numéro SIRET.
Rom1 (2024-07-06 18:01:57+00:00): Bonjour, les contributeurs précédents avaient adopté cette pratique et nous avons continué ainsi. Topologiquement parlant ce n'est pas faux. Le noeud est placé effectivement à l'entrée du commerce. Pour un centre commercial, bien entendu, chaque commerce sera dispersé dans le polygone du bâtiment.
Merci pour votre compréhension. Il y a bien d'autres sujets qui méritent d'y accorder du temps.
Yunan973 (2024-07-13 14:39:05+00:00): Merci pour votre réponse.

Juste pour info, le plugin revert est là pour contrer le vandalisme ou des erreurs graves qu'il serait trop long à corriger une par une après analyse de toutes les modifications du changeset.

Avant d'utiliser un revert sur un changeset, il est impératif de contacter la personne sauf s'il s'agit de vandalisme évident.

Avoir annulé un changeset 100% correct est du pur vandalisme. Je t'ai donc signalé aux modérateurs du site.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-07-28 15:38:49+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12029556081/history has fixme:type = statue that was added in this edit
see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Statue for info how statues should be marked
ika-chan! (2024-07-06 19:59:02+00:00): Slip roads are unreferenced, and was reverted.
aceman444 (2024-10-06 21:40:36+00:00): Zdravim, podla coho ste priradovali tie body pre label? Len podla nazvu? Lebo napr. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2275129 ste vybrali nespravny bod Strbske Pleso (su minimalne dva v tejto oblasti), ako mozete vidiet to zvolene je mimo hranic uzemia. Opravim to, ale len ci teda nemoze byt podobnych chyb viac.
*Martin* (2024-10-08 08:42:20+00:00): Myslim ze podla toho, ze place s rovnakym nazvom sa nachadza v danom uzemi.
ika-chan! (2024-07-03 01:42:46+00:00): There are no corner slip roads for the junction at location 37.008540,21.952134. To avoid being mistaken for someone making fantasy edits, please only add slip roads that physically exist.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153465541
Jose Riha (2025-10-23 12:31:33+00:00): okay electro a zaroven brand CCC asi nebude uplne spravne.. vies to prosim pozriet?
pitscheplatsch (2024-07-02 18:17:26+00:00): Hi oliverjeremy, welcome to OSM.

I think your map edits should be reviewed. 

Thanks.
pitscheplatsch (2024-07-02 18:18:16+00:00): In particular the use of the name tag.
oliverjeremy (2024-07-02 18:22:34+00:00): I’m all for it. What do you suggest?
Syl (2025-06-07 21:13:12+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai remis l'épicerie que vous aviez enlevé : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/80993166

Elle existe toujours !
chimel38 (2025-06-10 06:46:33+00:00): Merci pour la correction
maraf24 (2025-02-25 11:55:49+00:00): Dodane tereny kolejowe kłócą się z ty, , co jest w terenie.
Np. * https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1298612606 - track po lewej
* https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1298612605 - zadrzewienie na południu

Fikcja.
grzegorz75jan (2025-02-25 14:14:14+00:00): To konto nie odpowiada na wiadomości. Pisałem i nic. Trafiałem na dziwne edycje.
Destabilizacja (2025-02-25 19:36:48+00:00): Jeżeli coś jest niepoprawnie proszę zmieniać. Zmiany oparte są na ortofotomapie. Proszę wskazać dziwne edycje i zasugerować coś sensownego.