piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:14:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:22:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:23:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:16:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:15:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:19:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:14:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:18:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:15:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:21:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:11:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:16:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:18:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:12:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
AndreaDp271 (2024-05-14 10:47:07+00:00): The modification area is too big...
mcliquid (2024-05-14 13:52:17+00:00): Hi,

please note: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:web to
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
NeisBot (2024-05-14 03:25:07+00:00): Hi Prestonx7, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1253545202

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
NeisBot (2024-05-14 05:17:21+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151293841
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-14 05:32:59+00:00): Please don't add fake beaches to OSM!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:15:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:14:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:12:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:17:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:23:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
citrula (2024-05-14 21:34:52+00:00): You added the same name to a house and a church in this changeset - was that intentional?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151292422
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:16:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:23:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:12:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
meongseolin (2024-05-14 10:29:17+00:00): 麻烦您不要在这里测试，你可以不上传啊
julcnx (2024-05-14 13:51:57+00:00): I reverted your change because the updated road geometry overlaps with buildings and appears to have been inadvertently dragged. Please review your changes carefully before saving them. Thank you.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151314588
Stefan_89 (2024-07-17 10:53:43+00:00): Hallo,
Mir ist aufgefallen, dass du den Access tag verwendest um festzulegen ob ein befahren mit dem Fahrrad möglich ist. Das ist leider nicht ganz korrekt. Es geht dabei nur darum ob es erlaubt ist - mit dem Fahrrad dort zu fahren. Siehe die genaue erklärung:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2024-05-14 10:11:59+00:00): Hi! I see you re-aligned pprons in YUL (Montreal). PLeaseuse this offset when using Bing imagery in the Montreal region, like explained on this page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Montr%C3%A9al
Under Bing Map offset
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2024-05-14 10:19:47+00:00): I fixed the alignment in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151305160
Thanks!
literan (2024-05-14 20:08:25+00:00): нарисовали уже снесенное здание. На снимке же видно один мусор на его месте
literan (2024-05-14 20:08:33+00:00): на снимке Esri
map per (2024-05-15 17:49:34+00:00): Hallo jonnius,

wegen review_requested:

Das Tiefgarageneinfahrten eigene Adressen kommt öfters vor, hast du vor Ort nachgeschaut, ob an der Einfahrt ein Adressschild hängt?

Danke und viele Grüße
map per
jonnius (2024-05-15 20:04:29+00:00): Hallo map per,

ich war dort und mir ist kein Hausnummernschild an der Einfahrt aufgefallen. Das scheint auch eine Einfahrt für mehrere Häuser dort zu sein.
map per (2024-05-21 09:44:47+00:00): Ok, danke. Ich bin aber noch nicht so überzeugt. Bei größeren Wohnanlagen hat die Tiefgarageneinfahrt oft eine eigene Adresse.

Bevor man Adressen löscht sollte man nach der Adresse suchen. Löschungen, nur weil einem kein Schild aufgefallen ist sind sehr riskant.
map per (2024-08-02 17:16:18+00:00): Ich hab vor Ort nachgeschaut: Die Adresse Braystraße 13a existiert und das Schild ist nicht zu übersehen.

Hab die Adresse in OSM wieder eingezeichnet

Viele Grüße
map per
ToniE (2024-05-14 09:36:56+00:00): Hallo jonnius,

highway=path ist nicht mit dem deuschen Wort "Pfad" gleichzusetzen, schon gar nicht bei OSM.

highway=path ist hier korrekt gewesen. Oberflächeneigenschaften werden bei "path" prinzipiell nur über surface=paved/asphalt/paving_stones/... spezifiziert.

Gruß
Toni
aixbrick (2024-05-14 08:05:07+00:00): Hallo,
bist du sicher, dass der Betreiber die ASEAG ist? Vermutlich ist es eher die STAWAG.
Gruß
mahlersand (2024-05-14 17:57:11+00:00): Stimmt. Deswegen kam im Editor auch kein Vorschlag dafür. -.-
aixbrick (2024-05-15 15:31:02+00:00): :-)
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-14 05:27:28+00:00): Hi archpdx, thanks for partially removing the fake beach nodes. Shouldn't we also remove the mapped beach areas?
Mingwei (2024-05-31 16:41:21+00:00): Nice!
ElliottPlack (2024-05-15 02:02:14+00:00): Hi Oretty, I received your DWG ticket. Nice work on the edits so far. We'll get your limit raised. One comment for this change is to use the natural=woods for this sort of 'forest'. In OSM parlance, a forest is a managed stand for timber or something like that.
Oretty (2024-05-15 02:33:40+00:00): I can do that going further.  Wasn't too sure because they aren't exactly ancient growths but I wouldn't really consider them "managed" either.  Was just going with the flow.
ElliottPlack (2024-05-15 12:28:08+00:00): No worries! It is a nuanced differential
frozenrabi (2024-05-16 08:51:01+00:00): Please do not create random buildings out of nowhere. Review the imagery carefully and if only buildings exist there, draw a building.
NeisBot (2024-05-14 05:55:06+00:00): Hi Soulguide13, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/node/11903087006

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
NeisBot (2024-05-14 06:55:40+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151296713
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-14 06:56:07+00:00): Removed duplicate beach.
NeisBot (2024-05-14 07:45:57+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151298654
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-14 07:46:08+00:00): Removed duplicate beach
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-22 16:54:35+00:00): Hello!

You used
surface=graveled
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/383418980/history

Have you maybe meant
surface=gravel
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?
MxxCon (2024-05-15 01:30:04+00:00): Hello.
What exactly is this location? Is this a corporate office or a store or what?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151294759
d_berger (2024-05-14 15:49:16+00:00): Das Choupette ist daneben bereits eingetragen. Der POI war mal die Bar im Hotel. Die wurde meiner Beobachtung nach nicht wiedereröffnet?
sandstorm (2024-05-15 07:05:40+00:00): Soweit ich das gestern sehen konnte, hat es keine extra Bar dort. Und auf der Homepage von Locke am Platz (dem Hotel), wird auch das Choupette erwähnt: "Choupette - Restaurant & Bar"
contrapunctus (2024-06-07 06:48:48+00:00): Hello ompatekar. I observe this junction (on the ground, in person) very frequently. It is not a circle at all - it is roughly triangular, which is also reflected in the aerial imagery. The original geometry was more correct. I will try to revert the relevant geometrical changes in this changeset.
ompatekar (2024-06-07 12:09:42+00:00): Thanks for sharing your feedback. I appreciated your efforts to update it as per the ground reality.
cuzi (2024-10-08 14:09:14+00:00): Es gibt extra Präfixe für Straßen die nur geplant oder gerade gebaut werden, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lebenszyklus-Pr%C3%A4fix#Planung_und_Errichtung

Also statt "highway=residential" dann "planned:highway=residential" oder "construction:highway=residential"
literan (2024-05-14 20:06:30+00:00): это бытовки, а не здание
ZekOwney (2024-05-14 10:04:42+00:00): Bonjour,

J'ai restauré le cheminement piéton vers Cityfs à l'entrée d'Object'Ifs Sud. Il existe bien sur site (travaux récents), ainsi que des jeunes arbres (à recaler un jour).
Mapminik (2024-05-18 11:54:18+00:00): Czy coś było nie tak z wycofywanym zestawem zmian?
:-} (2024-05-18 12:26:50+00:00): Tak, mianowicie granice płotów były wywalone, przecinały się z drogami, zabudowaniami itp
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:11:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-19 18:40:31+00:00): Hello!

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/449959719/history - have you meant https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface=earth here? (or https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface=dirt )

Or is "terre" meaning something else here?
FloBob (2024-05-20 18:08:30+00:00): Hello,

Yes this is what I meant. Did I do something wrong or is fine?
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-20 18:46:27+00:00): It is fine, I just wanted to change it to surface=dirt (or surface=earth, it is basically the same) and wanted to confirm it would be accurate
silversurfer83 (2024-05-14 09:04:58+00:00): Moin d1no1981,

du hast darum gebeten, dass sich jemand diese Änderung ansieht. Ich mache das mal und sage auf dem Weg auch
Herzlich willkommen bei OSM und danke, dass du hilfst die Karte aktuell zu halten :)

Luftbild und Liegenschaftskarte (beide als Hintergrund verfügbar) sagen mir, dass dort ein Spielplatz ist. Passt also, was du da gemacht hast.

Details, die du verbessern könntest: Die Umrisse sind sehr grob. Da könntest du, mit Hilfe der Liegenschaftskarte (ALKIS) etwas sauberer werden. Und eine Quellenangabe für deine Änderung wäre auch super, in Zukunft.

Weiter viel Spaß an der Karte und bei Fragen immer raus damit
silversurfer83

P.S.: Falls du dich in Spielplätze reinnerden möchtest: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:playground
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151297052
eggie (2024-05-14 09:51:35+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback  Voor grass zijn meer taggingsmogelijkheden. landuse=farmland gebruiken we meer voor akkerland.
farmland met de combinatie crop=grass wordt niet veel gebruikt.

landuse=grass wordt veel algemeen gebruikt. 
natural=grassland voor niet onderhouden gras.
landuse=meadow voor begrazing. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
bart3308 (2024-05-14 11:12:45+00:00): Ok, dat kleine stukkie is ook meer permanent grasland, zal ik de volgende keer zo doen, bedankt voor de tips
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:17:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
NeisBot (2024-05-14 07:15:11+00:00): Hi Infinity lion, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/126701648

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
WoodWoseWulf (2024-05-14 20:19:38+00:00): Hi Infinity Lion - do have any evidence this actually happened? The most current imagery (which isn't that old) shows a pond here and I am unable to find any news articles or similar showing a beach has been constructed here.
CurlingMan13 (2024-05-15 03:02:39+00:00): I vote revert due to pokemon spam
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151297152
HellMap (2024-05-14 12:35:33+00:00): Sveiki!

Paldies par izmaiņām. Nedaudz pielaboju.

Šeit pēc kadastra ir divas ēkas (un divas adreses), tāpēc atvienoju kā iepriekš. Tā kā skola tagad viena, tad galvenā informācija ir uz https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/772990646 laukuma, bet ēkām tikai apzīmējums, ka skolas ēka.

Vēl piebildīšu, ka `building=gymansium` nozīmē lielu ēku sportam un fizkultūrai, bet ne viss "ģimnāzija". Drošvien šo var tā pazīmēt https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/170010789 bet ne ēkas, kur ir pamattelpas.

Paldies
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:12:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:23:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:22:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
NorthCrab_upload (2024-05-14 07:20:26+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11584063836

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
tastrax (2024-05-17 05:51:54+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
literan (2024-05-14 20:05:58+00:00): не надо отрисовывать уже снесенные здания.

там же отрисована стройка и на полигонах бывших зданий стоят теги demolished:building=commercial
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-11 02:51:51+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/913186185/history - what you tried to express by adding amenity=shop here ?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:18:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
frydzio (2024-05-14 13:11:12+00:00): Podczas edycji relacji dot. linii transportu miejskiego ważna jest kolejność elementów w relacji. Teraz jest tam lekki bałagan https://starsep.com/osm-wtp/#11
Tetryk (2024-05-14 13:55:41+00:00): Poprawwienie tej relacji zajmie więcej czasu, niestety, niż tworzenie od nowa. Brak wsparcia dla tramwajów we wspaniałym Relatify od Kamila.
frydzio (2024-05-14 14:50:11+00:00): Poprawiłem https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151316908 Na szczęście dość gładko poszło. Są jeszcze do zrobienia 4 warianty trasy (głupie rozróżnienie na Sielcach) ale teraz nie mam czasu
karr4s (2025-08-28 11:10:51+00:00): Salut,
J'aurais une question pour les ajouts de commerces : ça a été vérifié sur le terrain ? Il y en a certain qui sont bizarrement positionnés, comme la pâtisserie "Bouille et Gourmandise" situé dans une zone résidentielle où il ne semble pas y avoir le local commercial.
ZekOwney (2025-08-28 18:18:02+00:00): Salut,

Je connais de renommée (dans mon village), c'est un commerce à domicile. Y'a mm une tendance sur ce genre de prestation.
Info issue d'Osmose de mémoire et ça collait au niveau adresse.
D'ailleurs, j'en profite pour compléter : https://www.bouilleetgourmandises.com
karr4s (2025-08-29 06:33:51+00:00): ça marche, merci. ;)
NorthCrab_upload (2024-05-14 08:00:25+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9418439688
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/215066442
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/419564614

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀