piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2026-02-04 06:30:38+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 15 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1473905700 v1 | 15 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/4925830471 v3

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178054240
Langlaeufer (2026-02-04 09:11:08+00:00): Hat die Karte neben den Wegen wirklich spezielle Infos für Radfahrer, Wanderer, MTB und Reiter?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178054435
scharrel (2026-02-04 11:14:35+00:00): Hallo,
Es handelt sich um eine Topographische Karte. Gerne kann ich heute Abend noch ein Bild von machen. 
Welche „spezielle“ Infos soll die Karte sonst noch für Wanderer enthalten als noch die Wege?
VG
Langlaeufer (2026-02-04 11:51:44+00:00): Das wären markierte Wanderweg, Reitwege, Radrouten, MTB Routen,
Eben eine speziele Karte für diese Freizeitaktivitäten. Bei einer einfachen Topokarte kommt da kein hiking, etc ran.
NeisBot (2026-02-04 06:30:39+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 27 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1473907463 v1 | 27 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178054485
JoergD66 (2026-02-03 15:14:06+00:00): Die Rahmstraße hat unter der Bahnunterführung definitiv keinen Radweg → entfernt.
wachsihh (2026-02-03 20:59:36+00:00): Moin,
es geht leider schon wieder los.
Du hast ein Multipolygon defekt hinterlassen. CS Reverted.
LG
NeisBot (2026-02-04 06:30:42+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 12 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1473912197 v1 | 12 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178055109
NeisReview (2026-02-12 05:05:06+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/178106573
zuicz (2026-02-03 23:37:32+00:00): Witam. Mapujemy tylko obiekty które istnieją, a nie swoje pomysły na zagospodarowanie.
rempshaener (2026-02-04 19:23:00+00:00): Da du hier mit deinem Changeset von 16:09 die Nodes von 16:04 gedoppelt hast, aber „nur“ letztere mit ways verknüpft hast, habe ich dein Changeset mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178108784 revertiert. Unter anderem aus diesem Grund sind Importe unerwünscht.
rempshaener (2026-02-04 19:30:35+00:00): Bitte unterlasse das Erfassen von Wasserleitungen, zumal aus fragwürdigen Quellen. Zudem ist dein Tagging mit usage=penstock und
waterway=pressurised falsch.
rempshaener (2026-02-04 19:56:28+00:00): Hallo,
du hast hier
- mindestens eine Gebäudeecke gelöscht,
- an einer unüberschaubaren Anzahl von Stellen die Wasserleitung mit highway=* verknüpft,
- die Hydranten mit anderen Objekten verknüpft,
- mindestens eine Straße unterbrochen.
Auf Grund der Vielzahl unterschiedlicher Fehler habe ich keine andere Möglichkeit gesehen, dass dein Changeset mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178109956 in Gänze zurückzusetzen.
Viele Grüße
rempshaener (2026-02-04 19:59:19+00:00): Hallo,
auch hier bitte die Hydranten von den Straßen lösen. Insbesondere Überflurhydranten mit der Straße verknüpft ergibt keine Sinn.
Viele Grüße
gablerto (2026-02-04 20:12:23+00:00): Hallo.
Vieles was du sagst versteh ich nicht mal. Wollte nur unsere Hydranten für Openfiremap eintragen.
Ich werde die Wasserleitungen rauslöschen und für Ochsenfeld alles ohne Leitungen neu aufsetzen.
So gut es geht versuche ich alles zu korrigieren.
Gruss, Tobias
rempshaener (2026-02-04 21:09:34+00:00): Hallo,
dann gerne nachfragen.
Ist vielleicht auch ein wenig schade, dass es keine wirklich guten Anleitungen gibt.
Viele Grüße
rempshaener (2026-02-04 19:35:00+00:00): Hallo,
du hast hier erneut Dubletten angelegt.
Eine Änderung stammt von 16:05, eine von 16:09.
Ich habe letztere mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178109232 revertiert.
Viele Grüße
DD1GJ (2026-02-03 15:38:42+00:00): Hallo gablerto,

bitte die Hydranten nicht mit Straßen oder Kreuzungen verknüpfen. Das gibt bei späteten Lagekorrekturen enorme Porbleme. Wurden die Positionen auf der Wasserkarte zumindest stichprobenartig auf die Lagegenauigkeit geprüft?
rempshaener (2026-02-04 19:08:16+00:00): Hallo,
mein Hinweis auf die Importrichtlinien in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177918139 ist offensichtlich nicht angekommen.
Bitte unterlasse unabgestimmte Importe.
Viele Grüße
rempshaener (2026-02-04 19:26:54+00:00): Zumindest für Hydranten, die nicht auf Kreuzungen sitzen: In JOSM kann man den Punkt mit Alt-J wieder von der Linie trennen.
soliMM (2026-02-04 13:16:45+00:00): I have fully reverted maxspeed changes in this changeset: :178094425

Yes, there is 20 km/h sign. However, it doesn't span across whole school zone, there is no additional sign that would state that, and by traffic rules it ends at junction shortly after it. I have already mapped maxspeeds on this road segment based on latest Mapillary images.

Please be more careful when editing maxspeeds on OSM, this is not first time that I have to revert your changes.

Best regards
pavel_shturm (2026-02-04 14:19:14+00:00): Thanks. Sorry..
pavel_shturm (2026-02-04 14:22:19+00:00): Could you tell me if there's a way to simply flag the areas with questions on the map? So I don't have to fix anything myself anymore, but can just ask the community? (I'll try not to touch anything else.)
pavel_shturm (2026-02-04 14:31:22+00:00): I found the notes feature on OSM maps. I won't be editing anymore, I'll just be adding notes. I apologize for any erroneous edits. If you see anything else, I apologize in advance. From now on, I'll only update sentences through notes.
soliMM (2026-02-04 16:25:21+00:00): Hi pavel,

You are right, the notes function is there for this reason. Someone can put down a note with information about OSM data (if something is not correct or outdated), and then other mappers or community can fix the data. However, oftentimes it can take long time for someone to read and act on the note, and it also depends how detailed and clear note is, whether it is actionable remotely or not. 

Best thing is to update data yourself if you are familiar with the area. That brings me to the point where you said that you won't make edits on OSM yourself anymore. That is sad to hear, and my intention was not to discourage you from editing on OSM but rather point out some mistakes you made, so you fix that and contribute more accurate data. After all this is community project and the more of us contribute to it the better and thus more up to date data and map will be.

As you probably saw, even in my initial comment on one of your changesets I was just trying to bring it to you that some edits you did regarding maxspeeds weren't correct and what shouldn't be done.

We've all been there when we started with OSM, it can be overwhelming at moments but as it is community project it is important for us to be on the same page and work together and improve the data.

It would be nice if you don't give up on OSM completely but rather learn from mistakes and if you feel like it, reach out if you need help. So, I will repeat what I have wrote in first comment, if you need help with something feel free to reach out to someone or to community, you can get more information or ask questions on general forum or in more specific section of Serbia category https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/rs/64

or reach to the Serbian community on Telegram  https://t.me/osm_sr

Best regards
pavel_shturm (2026-02-06 09:00:40+00:00): I appreciate your advice! Would it be better if I checked the "request review" box for every edit? That way, you could reject the changes right away and avoid having to redo them?
pavel_shturm (2026-02-09 15:39:18+00:00): Good day! There's also a sign on the other side. It's valid up to the intersection, that is, beyond the turn. Most likely, the sign here is simply incorrectly installed for travel toward Priboyskaya Banya. The sign for travel toward Kokin Brod is correct and applies to the entire turn. (по ссылке обратная сторона знака 20) https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=43.5324949&lng=19.6244694&z=18.530261364713276&pKey=732540709275752&focus=photo
soliMM (2026-02-09 18:55:24+00:00): Hi! I've seen it, unfortunately there is no Mapillary images from the opposite direction to confirm it, but I assume that it's also 20km/h so I mapped it a such couple weeks ago. It starts at sing position and ends at junction.  If it hasn't shown up yet, in the application you are using, then you have to wait for data update on their end.
Taya_S (2026-02-12 12:42:38+00:00): Reverted data imported from Google

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178456174
Fraxi (2026-02-03 15:17:52+00:00): Т.е. при точка https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13522055652/ и https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13522055649/ при знаци "В26" има знаци "А13"
Fraxi (2026-02-03 15:20:29+00:00): Всъщност май са А12...
Fraxi (2026-02-03 16:45:10+00:00): Върнати някои промени с https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178059141
eggie (2026-02-03 15:45:29+00:00): Hi..
..horrible is a tag for paved roads.
Perhaps you mean very_bad?
Greetz,
eggie
Stromgitarrero (2026-02-03 16:17:12+00:00): Sorry my bad, I have very little experience with openstreetmap editing, these are my first baby steps.
eggie (2026-02-03 16:22:08+00:00): Hi,

The a more 'wiki's' about this subject.

For instance this one

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:smoothness

So in case it looks like this excemple horrible is no problem.

Enjoy mapping,
eggie
eggie (2026-02-03 16:22:48+00:00): Unpaved tracks with ruts, rocks etc that need a ground clearance of at least 21 cm (Toyota Landcruiser, Landrover, Lada Niva, bukhanka, etc.). Skid plate protection is advisable.
bartgron (2026-02-03 20:54:19+00:00): Zestaw zmian wycofany:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178067801
Pozdrawiam
tomhukins (2026-02-28 16:26:37+00:00): Thank you for your helpful work improving the map.  Might https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:opening%20hours=closed?uselang=en-GB make more sense than the "opening_hours=off" here?
VictorIE (2026-05-15 13:39:40+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13522038372/

I'm just checking if this is the correct location. It seems unusual to have a post box so far off the public road.

Is it an ordinary green post box that one would normally find on the side of a street?
3Loader3 (2026-05-18 12:45:22+00:00): Yes it is. The post office was situated in the building containing the hardware shop until very recently, and the letterbox has remained.
VictorIE (2026-05-18 13:17:21+00:00): A-ha! I was doing a bulk upgrading of post objects and this one seemed odd.
rarad74 (2026-02-03 15:36:02+00:00): Hi. Please use Mapbox imagery in Bucharest. Are the most recent ( 1-1,5 year old).
WasserMountain (2026-02-04 15:53:13+00:00): Hello rarad74,
Mapbox Satellite does appear to be the most up-to-date here. I will be mindful of using that imagery in Bucharest.
eggie (2026-02-03 16:07:30+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  Zie voor building icm residential https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dresidential

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
mueschel (2026-02-08 15:49:18+00:00): Please check this road, something went wrong with the tags.
SaiPranathi02 (2026-02-09 10:14:32+00:00): Thank you for the valuable feedback. Please feel free to point out similar suggestions in future as well. Regards, Sai Pranathi Pamidimarri.
NeisBot (2026-02-04 06:32:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13500806115 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Tire shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-12 05:05:02+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178435634
(No visible changes after review)
eggie (2026-02-03 15:41:58+00:00): Dag Ciedev,
Bedankt voor hee bijdrage.
Probeer svp op de adresnode bij te taggen. Dus niet op het gebouw zelf.
Wat is de naam van dit hotel?

Mvg,
eggie
hauke-stieler (2026-03-05 20:30:02+00:00): Moin,

du hast hier diverse Hausnummern eingetragen. Welche Quelle hast du dafür benutzt? Bitte gebe solche Datenquellen im Changeset an. Wenn du vor Ort warst, ist "survey" als Quellenangabe üblich, um zu sagen, dass man die Daten selbst erhoben hat.

Grüße
Hauke
rivermont (2026-02-16 04:57:45+00:00): Hello, why did you delete way 16404052 Wilson Creek Trail? It is perfectly real and you left a bunch of other trails disconnected.
YPGGUUY (2026-02-09 03:59:01+00:00): Hello, would you consider instead apply cycleway:right=* on main road? Zhuhai Bridge does not have separated bike road. sidewalk=right is already applied.
GfCiS (2026-02-10 02:59:27+00:00): Hello, sorry, i missed there was already a tag attached. I removed the separate path, but I did add a Bicycle 'yes' to the existing tag. The bridge is open to bikes and scooters.
YPGGUUY (2026-02-24 08:09:17+00:00): Thank you.
As this is a trunk road, iD implies "unknown" accessibility for foot/bike/horse. It is nice to tag bicycle=yes. Besides there is an alternative motorroad=no to indicate this trunk road is viable for all traffic.
rezemika (2026-02-04 18:45:36+00:00): Bonjour, et bienvenue sur OpenStreetMap ! :)
Je me permets juste de signaler une petite coquille ici : l'usage habituel lorsque la désignation d'un objet change est de changer sa clé "ref" en "old_ref", ce qui en l'occurrence donnerait "old_ref=D 130" (et éventuellement rajouter la nouvelle référence de ce tronçon de route dans une nouvelle clé "ref"). Je vous laisse faire la modif ? :)
rezemika (2026-02-04 18:47:10+00:00): (et pareil sur les autres modifications que vous aviez apporté aux alentours, il y a juste à changer la clé sinon c'est tout bon)
christopheCD22 (2026-02-05 08:15:59+00:00): Bonjour,
Je veux bien que ous vous occupiez de faire la modification. j'ai suivi les préconisations de enezeg. 
merci
rezemika (2026-02-05 13:27:15+00:00): D'accord, pas de soucis ! :)
rezemika (2026-02-05 13:37:48+00:00): Je crois que j'ai compris la confusion. En fait sur certains tronçons le "old_" a été ajouté dans la valeur ("ref=old_D 130") et pas dans la clé ("old_ref=D 130"). Mais c'est corrigé ! :)
mavl (2026-02-04 14:51:37+00:00): Здравствуйте. Столь масштабное удаление сельских поселений где-то обсуждалось?
mavl (2026-02-04 15:43:52+00:00): Ещё по поводу источника. Закон от 04 ноября 1996 года № 53, который вы приводите, называется "Об административно-территориальном устройстве Тюменской области", а в OSM отражено "Муниципальное деление".  
  
Это закон от 05 ноября 2004 года №  263 "Об установлении границ муниципальных образований Тюменской области и наделении их статусом муниципального округа, городского округа".  

Это разные вещи. Например, для Ялуторовского муниципального округа вы добавили тег   
  
old_name=Ялуторовский район  

То есть создаётся впечатление, что Ялуторовского района больше не существует. А он существует и упоминается в законе № 53, на который вы ссылаетесь. То есть тег old_name ложный.

Административно-территоральная единица "Ялуторовский район" существует. С 2025 года были внесены изменения в муниципальное деление, но не административно-территориальное.  
  
Для остальных районов также тег old_name неверен.
Danil Moiseenko (2026-02-04 17:28:56+00:00): Здравствуйте.
Удаление сельских поселений, увы не обсуждалось.
На счёт источника: в разделе 2 "ПЕРЕЧЕНЬ ИНЫХ НАСЕЛЕННЫХ ПУНКТОВ ТЮМЕНСКОЙ ОБЛАСТИ" там указаны районы. Действительно в 2025 году были внесены изменения в муниципальное деление, в результате которого районы стали муниципальными округами и сельские поселения утратили статус муниципального образования. И никаких изменений в административно-территориальное деление не было. Вы правы. Ошибся в описании пакетов правок, приношу извинения.
В любом случае, я понимал что правки могут быть отменены раз:
Во-первых, не было обсуждения.
А во-вторых, не все могли знать что это произошло.
Не зря я ставил галочку на проверку моих изменений.
mavl (2026-02-14 08:42:34+00:00): Я добавил для Ялуторовского муниципального округа тег alt_name=Ялуторовский район (это его административно-территориальное название).  Тег old_name=Ялуторовский район заменён на old_name=Ялуторовский муниципальный район (это его реальное старое муниципальное название).  
  
Обсуждение идёт здесь:  
  
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/topic/50177/570
NeisBot (2026-02-04 06:30:50+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 12 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/95024280 v5 | 6 crossings
https://osm.org/way/276212311 v3 | 6 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178057598
NeisReview (2026-02-12 05:05:07+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/178058011
https://osm.org/changeset/178098319
dlegg73 (2026-02-04 23:30:55+00:00): Correction: Source used was Bing Ariel Imagery; Bing Streetside.
ManuelB701 (2026-02-05 06:17:22+00:00): Aren't many of these roads driveways, though? If so, they should be tagged as highway=service + service=driveway instead for both rendering (less prominent on the map) and purpose (being non-public roads which lead to a property).
eggie (2026-02-03 16:26:45+00:00): Hi,

I think this is okay in case this is the definition Unpaved roads with potholes and ruts, but still passable with an average SUV with a ground clearance of at least 18 cm.* 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:smoothness
MassCartog (2026-02-03 18:08:32+00:00): Hi welcome to OSM. Wanted to let you know those water ways through lakes is one way OMS users map flowlines. Please read about flowlines on the wiki for more info: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Dflowline
surlaw (2026-02-06 17:01:41+00:00): Ah, did not know that. It seems the proper course of action would be to convert the stream to a flowline. After all, the stream no longer exists so the map would technically be incorrect otherwise.
MassCartog (2026-02-06 19:00:29+00:00): Thanks for the reply, Yah I think setting it to flowline would be correct!
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-06 01:44:35+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13522140183

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eggie (2026-02-03 16:59:03+00:00): Welkom bij OSM,

Bedankt voor je bijdrage. Probeer svp op de bestaande adresnode bij te taggen De adressen zijn ook niet compleet.

Mvg,
eggie
MarkoŠatrak (2026-02-06 16:18:57+00:00): Wrong tagging of no U-turn for hgv fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178195489
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-05 22:35:03+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nieprawidłowa wartość addr:postcode. Kod pocztowy powinien być formatu XX-XXX, gdzie X oznacza cyfrę.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13522244401

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-05 23:44:56+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nieprawidłowa wartość addr:postcode. Kod pocztowy powinien być formatu XX-XXX, gdzie X oznacza cyfrę.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13522244401

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-05 23:54:56+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nieprawidłowa wartość addr:postcode. Kod pocztowy powinien być formatu XX-XXX, gdzie X oznacza cyfrę.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13522244401

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-06 00:35:04+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nieprawidłowa wartość addr:postcode. Kod pocztowy powinien być formatu XX-XXX, gdzie X oznacza cyfrę.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13522244401

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-06 00:45:02+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nieprawidłowa wartość addr:postcode. Kod pocztowy powinien być formatu XX-XXX, gdzie X oznacza cyfrę.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13522244401

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-06 00:54:56+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nieprawidłowa wartość addr:postcode. Kod pocztowy powinien być formatu XX-XXX, gdzie X oznacza cyfrę.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13522244401

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀