piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Norbert Dichter (2026-04-01 15:08:31+00:00): Hello, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. Thank you for your contribution. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. Or just hit the Q-key.
Also please keep in mind: many buildings are very close but do not actually touch each other, try to map them close to each other without letting them connect or share nodes with each other, roads, or residential area outlines. In the iD web editor, holding down the "alt" key will keep nodes from "snapping" to each other and accidentally connecting.  Thanks so much for your contribution, Norbert 'Nodi' Dichter, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180694676
Norbert Dichter (2026-04-01 15:08:13+00:00): Hello, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. Thank you for your contribution. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. Or just hit the Q-key.
Also please keep in mind: many buildings are very close but do not actually touch each other, try to map them close to each other without letting them connect or share nodes with each other, roads, or residential area outlines. In the iD web editor, holding down the "alt" key will keep nodes from "snapping" to each other and accidentally connecting.  Thanks so much for your contribution, Norbert 'Nodi' Dichter, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180694687
samho1234567 (2026-04-01 01:36:07+00:00): The official name of Public Transport Interchange should be Long Tin Road Public Transport Interchange (朗天路公共運輸交匯處)?
NeisBot (2026-03-31 22:57:51+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 8 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/691196624 v7 | 8 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180695299
Norbert Dichter (2026-04-01 15:06:06+00:00): Hello, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. Thank you for your contribution. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. Or just hit the Q-key.
Also please keep in mind: many buildings are very close but do not actually touch each other, try to map them close to each other without letting them connect or share nodes with each other, roads, or residential area outlines. In the iD web editor, holding down the "alt" key will keep nodes from "snapping" to each other and accidentally connecting.  Thanks so much for your contribution, Norbert 'Nodi' Dichter, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180695408
Wildsharky (2026-04-03 06:09:37+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:180761861
Norbert Dichter (2026-04-01 15:05:44+00:00): Hello, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. Thank you for your contribution. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. Or just hit the Q-key.
Also please keep in mind: many buildings are very close but do not actually touch each other, try to map them close to each other without letting them connect or share nodes with each other, roads, or residential area outlines. In the iD web editor, holding down the "alt" key will keep nodes from "snapping" to each other and accidentally connecting.  Thanks so much for your contribution, Norbert 'Nodi' Dichter, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180695505
Falkons (2026-04-07 03:21:19+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Demolished_railways
You should refer to this as it seems like a decent chunk of the area you marked as part of the railway simply doesn't have any remnants of a rail or its infrastructure other than maybe an open space where it might have been located. Like along the bike trail around Pearl Harbor, I don't see any traces of it in-person while I was going through it.
Norbert Dichter (2026-04-01 15:05:28+00:00): Hello, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. Thank you for your contribution. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. Or just hit the Q-key.
Also please keep in mind: many buildings are very close but do not actually touch each other, try to map them close to each other without letting them connect or share nodes with each other, roads, or residential area outlines. In the iD web editor, holding down the "alt" key will keep nodes from "snapping" to each other and accidentally connecting.  Thanks so much for your contribution, Norbert 'Nodi' Dichter, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180695600
eggie (2026-04-01 05:37:18+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback Welk bord staat hier vooraan?
Iets wordt alleen een fietspad als er een bord fietspad staat.
Waarom maxspeed 30 op een fietspad?

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-04-01 05:48:54+00:00): Volgens mij is dit een achterom. Ik heb het weer aangepast naar een alley.
Er was nooit een verbinding met het industrieterrein in OSM. Wat was het probleem?
MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-04-01 11:44:40+00:00): De route https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_car&route=51.549278%2C4.943672%3B51.54862%2C4.945034
Norbert Dichter (2026-04-01 15:04:34+00:00): Hello, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. Thank you for your contribution. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. Or just hit the Q-key.
Also please keep in mind: many buildings are very close but do not actually touch each other, try to map them close to each other without letting them connect or share nodes with each other, roads, or residential area outlines. In the iD web editor, holding down the "alt" key will keep nodes from "snapping" to each other and accidentally connecting.  Thanks so much for your contribution, Norbert 'Nodi' Dichter, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180695984
NeisBot (2026-03-31 23:33:53+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/10012483156 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Furniture removal office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-04-09 04:33:04+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/180696508
mike140 (2026-04-09 00:15:39+00:00): Прочитайте уважно що таке мультиполігони і з чого вони складаються: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:Relation:multipolygon
John Kastner (2026-04-01 11:45:44+00:00): Why the change to the West Colonnade?
nickvet419 (2026-04-01 18:19:51+00:00): mistake... fixed
Norbert Dichter (2026-04-01 15:03:00+00:00): Hello, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. Thank you for your contribution. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. Or just hit the Q-key.
Also please keep in mind: many buildings are very close but do not actually touch each other, try to map them close to each other without letting them connect or share nodes with each other, roads, or residential area outlines. In the iD web editor, holding down the "alt" key will keep nodes from "snapping" to each other and accidentally connecting.  Thanks so much for your contribution, Norbert 'Nodi' Dichter, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180696428
felipeeugenio (2026-04-01 11:05:34+00:00): Todo duplicado. Reversado.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180696467
NeisBot (2026-03-31 23:54:54+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/10012483156 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Furniture removalist"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-09 04:33:09+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181077503
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
NeisBot (2026-04-01 00:00:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13696727322 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Furniture removalist"

#MapWithoutSpam
Extra Care Removals (2026-04-01 00:14:31+00:00): Updated to a more neutral description.
Norbert Dichter (2026-04-01 15:01:56+00:00): Hello, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. Thank you for your contribution. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. Or just hit the Q-key.
Also please keep in mind: many buildings are very close but do not actually touch each other, try to map them close to each other without letting them connect or share nodes with each other, roads, or residential area outlines. In the iD web editor, holding down the "alt" key will keep nodes from "snapping" to each other and accidentally connecting.  Thanks so much for your contribution, Norbert 'Nodi' Dichter, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180696734
DerSeegurke (2026-04-02 09:21:37+00:00): Hi SanidinKhe!
Beim Löschen der Schranke sind hier leider die zwei Wegstücke voneinander getrennt worden und nicht mehr durchgängig. Ich vermute, das war so nicht beabsichtigt.

Zudem läuft das neu angelegte Wegstück fast exakt über schon vorhandene Wege, was wohl auch nicht so gedacht war.

Daher würde ich vorschlagen, dieses Changeset zu reverten und dann bei dem Schranken-Node nur die Tags zu löschen.

Sehe ich das richtig, dass die Wanderwege östlich vom Hölzbach über den Pfad, dann über die kleine Brücke nach Westen und dort über den breiten Forstweg wieder nach Süden verlaufen? Zumindest das Brückchen müsste dann neu angelegt werden, damit man den Verlauf der Wanderwege korrigieren kann. Auf den Luftbildern sieht es aber sogar so aus, als sei parallel zum Forstweg westlich auch noch ein schmaler Pfad, den es so in OSM noch nicht gibt. Weißt du da noch genaueres?

Viele Grüße!
DerSeegurke (2026-04-05 23:21:54+00:00): Habe mir die Situation vor Ort angeschaut und das Changeset reverted (Changeset 180912733). Die Wanderwege wurden in Changeset 180917647 angepasst.
BCNorwich (2026-04-01 07:26:23+00:00): These are garages.
Christie Ciara (2026-04-01 07:58:27+00:00): The garages have been knocked down and two bungalows have been built in this area, hence why the road name has also been changed to allow for these new addresses
Xvtn (2026-04-01 12:47:37+00:00): Hey Josh, thanks as always for your quality edits. In the future, can you provide at least a few words describing what you changed in the changeset comment? It really helps out other contributors. Happy mapping!
Wildsharky (2026-04-03 06:11:58+00:00): Revert of 180692866
iandees (2026-04-01 02:22:58+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5519471288 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180698674, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
MassCartog (2026-04-01 13:20:13+00:00): Hi welcome to OSM. Could you explain why you removed these roads loading into parking lots?
Hung Tran 9x0 (2026-04-11 13:03:56+00:00): Có cây cầu cuối ngõ 72 lĩnh nam hướng sang ct3 họ đã rào quây tôn từ lâu, hôm nay tôi đi qua vẫn thấy quây tôn, không đi được. Không biết lúc bạn đi qua hôm đó họ mở thông hẳn hay chỉ mở tạm thôi?
Vmosnokia31 (2026-04-11 14:00:26+00:00): Ngõ 383 Tam Trinh đúng không? Hôm tôi sửa thì không rõ là gỡ hẳn cầu chưa, nhưng quên chưa để barrier. Với lại tôi cũng bận nên chưa kiểm chứng lại được. Để tôi sửa lại
SomeoneElse (2026-04-01 02:33:13+00:00): Are you sure that the address of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13697101302 is correct?  Monmore Road is to the east, just south of the dog track: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/73717871 .
Nikhil kotiya (2026-04-01 05:49:17+00:00): fixing
SomeoneElse (2026-04-01 18:06:48+00:00): Alas, you only fixed this one address, not the 100s of other made-up addresses that you added, hence the need for a revert.
Taya_S (2026-04-01 09:15:38+00:00): Middle of the street
Taya_S (2026-04-01 08:58:34+00:00): POI placed outside of buildings, right next to an already mapped location
Taya_S (2026-04-01 08:58:08+00:00): POI placed on top of already mapped GSF Car parts building
Taya_S (2026-04-01 09:15:29+00:00): Duplicated
Taya_S (2026-04-01 08:56:59+00:00): Duplicated poi on top of existing GSF Car Parts building
Taya_S (2026-04-01 08:57:24+00:00): POI outside of building outline
Taya_S (2026-04-01 09:15:20+00:00): Also duplicated
Taya_S (2026-04-01 08:55:21+00:00): Is this the correct location? I see that there is already a 'unit 20' mapped nearby https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/41602949
Taya_S (2026-04-01 08:59:45+00:00): POI outside of building outline
Taya_S (2026-04-01 08:59:30+00:00): Duplicated
Taya_S (2026-04-01 08:59:25+00:00): POI on parking lot
no details provided here (2026-04-01 07:07:50+00:00): This point should be associated with a building as it relates to a commercial premises. Please clarify.
Taya_S (2026-04-01 08:53:31+00:00): How come this address differs from the address already of the building?
Taya_S (2026-04-01 08:59:08+00:00): POI located on parking lot
trigpoint (2026-04-01 10:40:20+00:00): Whilst this edit has been reverted, something is going very seriously wrong as you have again got the postcode wrong and from that you have also got the street, hence address wrong. For some bizarre reason the postcode isn't what is used on the GSF Website.

Cheers Phil
Taya_S (2026-04-01 09:16:20+00:00): It would have been better here to also draw the building instead of just adding a POI.
trigpoint (2026-04-01 09:49:41+00:00): Bore da Nikhil
What is the source of Queen's Road here?
Also as previously asked, please map this type of object as a way/area, usually on the building.

Diolch Phil
Norbert Dichter (2026-04-01 15:01:11+00:00): Hello, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. Thank you for your contribution. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. Or just hit the Q-key.
Also please keep in mind: many buildings are very close but do not actually touch each other, try to map them close to each other without letting them connect or share nodes with each other, roads, or residential area outlines. In the iD web editor, holding down the "alt" key will keep nodes from "snapping" to each other and accidentally connecting.  Thanks so much for your contribution, Norbert 'Nodi' Dichter, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180699403
Alliegaytor (2026-04-01 03:41:26+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap.

Just letting you know that the name=* key should be used for the actual name of a thing and not be used in a descriptive manner.

Please see here for more information: 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name

And here for how to address buildings https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:*
fortera_au (2026-04-01 22:21:12+00:00): There's also some issues with how these buildings have been drawn, can you please clean these up to follow the building outline and not overlap with the fences (which may require adjusting the fence positions if needed.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180699799
Ewen Hill (2026-04-01 11:58:57+00:00): Hi Caleb, I am a little confused by the two entries at Alexandra and Maffra - what were you attempting to do as one is a miniature railway and the other was not a bridge?
Caleb NHVR (2026-04-01 23:05:13+00:00): Hi Ewen, I believe this was user error on my behalf while looking at different railway types in editing mode. My intent was only to add the disused:railway=rail, in line with the tags along neighbouring rail segments on South Maitland Railway. I'll review my changeset for any additional impacts. 
Cheers,
Caleb
Caleb NHVR (2026-04-01 23:43:08+00:00): Just a quick clarification, the intent was to add disused:railway=rail onto way 465277245. Thanks again
rarad74 (2026-04-01 04:18:56+00:00): Salut. Alea puteai sa le lasi. De aceea exista tag specific de constructii care interzice traficul. Exagerezi...
rarad74 (2026-04-01 04:21:18+00:00): Ideea e ca daca tu ( saui atcineva) nu te mai ocupi din cine stie ce probleme de harta, elementele raman sterse pana se prinde cineva de lipsa lor. Plus ca sunt o gramada de tag-uri aditionale puse pe ele si sunt sanse ca la refacere sa nu mai fie adaugate, sa fie uitate.
Kovoschiz (2026-04-01 08:07:35+00:00): Don't use brackets as descriptor labels on `name=` , which is for proper names only. Use `alt_name=` + `ref=`
kingkingHK (2026-05-17 09:31:45+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182774295#map=18/22.342985/114.133346
NeisBot (2026-04-01 04:03:39+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 8 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1494900245 v2 | 8 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180700136
NeisReview (2026-04-09 04:33:10+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/180701578
NeisBot (2026-04-01 04:26:23+00:00): 🌍 Добро пожаловать в OSM, mli495979.
Спасибо за вклад!

Чтобы сделать сотрудничество проще и помочь другим понять ваши правки, лучше добавить краткое описание сделанных изменений. Ясные комментарии помогают сообществу следить за вашей работой и предоставлять более лучшие отзывы. Вы можете найти советы по написанию хороших комментариев здесь[1].

✅ Вот пример комментария на основе ваших правок карты: "Добавлено детское учреждение с телефонным номером, деталями образования и названием"
(Auto-translation)
---
🌍 Welcome to OSM, mli495979.
Thanks for contributing!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

✅ Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added kindergarten with phone number, education details, and name"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment
sin314 (2026-04-01 07:09:39+00:00): Hi, the local convention is to use the full station name e.g. Peng Kang Hill for the name tag to stay consistent with the rest of the network. Could you revert this change?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180700485
ntumaps (2026-04-02 01:15:00+00:00): Dear Admin,
Thank you for your reply.
This change was requested by our NTU management, and we would like to clarify a few points regarding the process:
1.	Update Process
If we edit the information, will it be routed to your team for approval? Once approved, will the changes then be reflected on the maps? 
2.	“Local Convention” Clarification
When you mentioned “local convention,” could you clarify who determines this? Is it set by SMRT Corporation or another governing organisation e.g LTA? 
3.	MazeMap / OpenStreetMap Handling
We are currently using MazeMap, with basemaps from OpenStreetMap. Is there any way within MazeMap to override or hide this naming from OpenStreetMap?

Thanks
Best regards
kenken234 (2026-04-17 08:35:14+00:00): 1. This is an open map, anyone can edit it.

2. The naming is set to the primary name of the feature in the real world. For more info: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names

3. You'll have to check with MazeMap and make a feature request (or use an existing feature?) to MazeMap to override the name with the abbreviation codes on their custom map renders. 
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/organization-changed-mrt-station-name-tags-to-station-code-how-to-proceed/142779/4

Please do not edit just to fit personal uses. This is a map for everyone, not just one particular user/group. Thank you.