piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Peter Elderson (2023-09-14 11:09:13+00:00): Hoi Geim, weet je zeker dat dit een highway=mini_roundabout is? Er moet dan namelijk wel een rotondeverkeersbord staan, en alle toekomende wegen moeten give_way borden/haaietanden hebben. Zo niet dan is het een gewone kruising, misschien met een obstakel in het midden, maar een ronde vorm maakt het nog geen rotonde volgens OSM!
Geim (2023-09-14 11:28:16+00:00): Op basis van deze note ingevoerd: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3446216#map=16/53.1592/5.7869&layers=N
DaveF (2023-03-22 16:47:20+00:00): Hi
Welcome to OSM.
Where did you obtain the information that it's a 30mph limit.
MxxCon (2023-03-23 04:24:11+00:00): Hello.
You mapped swings as both area and node. Doing that goes against https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element guideline.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133947138
gscholz (2023-03-25 06:19:07+00:00): Hi martin_ferrari85,
your recent edit activity has left behind a significant amount of errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-58.78067&lat=-25.74689&zoom=9&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=133947299

Can you please fix this?

As this seems to be a systematical error, may be you can think about how to avoid this error at all?

If you look closely at you new natural areas you will find, they overlap here and there with other areas, so they are quite inaccurate. May be you can improve this as well to improve the quality of your edits in total.

Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2023-03-22 06:14:07+00:00): Hi martin_ferrari85,
your recent edit activity has left behind a significant amount of errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-58.78067&lat=-25.74689&zoom=9&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=133947447

Can you please fix this?

As this seems to be a systematical error, may be you can think about how to avoid this error at all?

If you look closely at you new natural areas you will find, they overlap here and there with other areas, so they are quite inaccurate. May be you can improve this as well to improve the quality of your edits in total.

Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2023-03-23 07:01:17+00:00): Hola martin_ferrari85,
estos errores siguen existiendo, ¿pueden darme su opinión al respecto?
Guido
gscholz (2023-03-22 06:15:21+00:00): Hi martin_ferrari85,
your recent edit activity has left behind a significant amount of errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-58.78067&lat=-25.74689&zoom=9&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=133947580

Can you please fix this?

As this seems to be a systematical error, may be you can think about how to avoid this error at all?

If you look closely at you new natural areas you will find, they overlap here and there with other areas, so they are quite inaccurate. May be you can improve this as well to improve the quality of your edits in total.

Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2023-03-25 06:20:01+00:00): Hola martin_ferrari85,
estos errores siguen existiendo, ¿pueden darme su opinión al respecto?
Guido
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2023-03-22 11:48:44+00:00): CHSLD Saint-Joseph-de-la-Providence is already mapped. You only edited a pedestrian crossing. Not sure what you were trying to edit.
silversurfer83 (2023-03-22 09:35:49+00:00): Gude :)

Eine Bitte hätte ich:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

Weil über 100e CS nur "Verbesserung" ist leider absolut nicht hilfreich.

Vielen Dank
silversurfer83
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2023-03-22 10:57:20+00:00): Please do not vandalize data on OpenStreetMap. Only add verified and validated data.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2023-03-22 11:02:50+00:00): And do not add personal data (like your own home)
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2023-03-22 10:53:54+00:00): OpenStreetMap is not a playground. Please do not add fictious data. OpenStreetMap is for real verified data.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-03-21 16:40:28+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9418441242
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1156095231

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2023-03-21 16:40:29+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10751197889
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10751197890

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
user_18305684 (2023-05-10 21:18:59+00:00): Hi,

why did you removed the link to the 3D view ?
Supaplex (2023-03-22 01:12:14+00:00): wheelchair相關標籤應該不用移除吧？
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133948479
Littlebtc (2023-03-22 08:15:22+00:00): 1. 已結業無法進入的店家，現存標籤沒有意義
2. 重新裝修開幕後的狀況需要重新調查

基於以上理由我都會習慣拿掉
rs_mapping (2023-03-21 18:04:49+00:00): Also ohne Name wäre mangels brauchbarer Quelle n Kompromiss.
Bei hw=service stimme ich aber nicht zu.
Die Straße wird regelmäßig zur Durchfahrt benutzt, hat Einfahrten zu mehreren Häusern, Parken an der Straße und Parkflächen daneben.
Zumindest die Wiki Beschreibung von Service passt so gar nicht dazu.
aixbrick (2023-03-21 18:16:04+00:00): Der einzige Zweck ist doch, das Haus/Grundstück und die Parkplätze zu erreichen. Das ist mir für hw=residential zu wenig, denn damit würde ich die Straße auf eine Stufe mit z.B. der Mauerstraße setzen, die aber eine deutlich größere Verkehrsbedeutung hat.
rene78 (2023-03-21 16:51:56+00:00): The changeset comment should be: Moved Koh Phangan town node to the center of the island. I got confused why "Thong Sala" is called "Koh Phangan"
watmildon (2023-06-27 02:49:21+00:00): Hello!

Love the detail in your edits on this area. Just a heads up that addr:street should have all shortened portions expanded to their full text. ex: "E Virgil Dr" -> "East Virgil Drive". Not a big deal but does help alleviate confusion and keep tools happy.

I'm rolling through with address data for this area as part of this project (https://tasks.openstreetmap.us/projects/377) so anything here will be noticed and patched up by me. Happy to do so.

Keep up the great mapping!

Matt
Milhouse (2023-03-22 01:54:42+00:00): The presence of cameras has no bearing on legal access at the moment. I checked The Gazette and if the local authority are planning to restrict access, they haven't begun the legal process yet. Please don't make edits that speculate about future changes.
Adrian Prejbeanu (2023-03-22 09:02:09+00:00): We are a delivery company, and we have received in the past 2 months, about 20 PCNs. It's a private company that manages the parking in that estate. The moment you pass through, in front of the ANPR, the camera picks it up immediately, unless you manage to find the estate management office, to whitelist your vehicle for the day, you will get a PCN 100%. The estate management office, is not clearly visible, is hidden away in one of the buildings, and they are not always there, and they are as well, closed during the weekends. As for as I'm aware, the street in that estate is private, and is not managed by the council. I didn't make the edit based on a speculation, we are actively delivering in that area, on a daily basis. And as well, because it's a private company that manages the parking in the estate, contesting the PCNs is pointless as usual, they don't care about the proof of needing access to make a delivery to one of the residents. I can send you some of the PCNs as proof if you require them.
Milhouse (2023-03-22 14:48:41+00:00): That sounds very frustrating and possibly illegal! I'll have another look next time I'm up there. Are you sure the PCN is for accessing the area and not for parking somewhere you aren't allowed to? I don't think the road is private, it's a locally adopted road as far as I know. The council do implement school streets and some no-through-roads but this should always be clearly signposted.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133949710
Adrian Prejbeanu (2023-03-22 15:07:12+00:00): To access the selected bit of Singapore Rd with a vehicle, you've contacted me about, you have to go through Tewkesbury Rd. To enter Tewkesbury Rd, you have to enter through either Singapore Rd at South or Talbot Rd at North, both of the entrances having signage of "Private Land" and ANPR Cameras, which can be as well seen on Google's Street View, although the signage is not that clear in those photos.

Yes, the PCNs are for accessing Tewkesbury Rd.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133949710
Milhouse (2023-03-22 19:36:40+00:00): I snapped a photo of the sign at the corner of Tewkesbury and Singapore but once I got home realised it says "See signs in car parks for details". Do you have a photo of that? I think you probably have grounds to challenge - for a start private companies can't issue PCNs and secondly you aren't parking, you're loading/unloading. Have you tried challenging it?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133949710
Adrian Prejbeanu (2023-03-22 20:51:53+00:00): Yes. We've tried in different ways, but they always send you back a "standard" reply, blaming it on the driver not respecting the terms and conditions. We gave up in the end, and we either don't enter the zone at all, or the delivery driver walks the whole estate with the parcels if he has to.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133949710
Milhouse (2023-03-22 20:58:05+00:00): Do you have a copy of the terms and conditions or a photo of the Parking terms that you could share?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133949710
Adrian Prejbeanu (2023-03-22 21:03:39+00:00): Not at hand, I'll need to be at work, and check through the history, or to have a delivery driver go around the area again.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133949710
Frans S (2023-03-21 18:01:38+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings not accurate mapped.
Mapped yards instead of adjacent building. Look for shadow !
Buildings not squared.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133949726
wille (2023-03-22 21:39:04+00:00): Olá Samuell. Você está mapeando condomínios como se fossem bairros. Segundo os correios, esse bairro seria "Antônio Cassimiro". Acredito que você deveria mapear o condomínio como Área Residencial
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133949735
Joseph R P (2023-05-07 14:47:26+00:00): I have reverted this changeset and all other changesets you made to NV 160 after this one. One speed limit sign does not indicate the speed limit of an entire road, and it should be assumed that a road with so many traffic signals and driveways does not have such a high speed limit. 

You're also citing Google Maps as a source, which is illegal to do as it is copyrighted data.
Geofreund1 (2023-12-10 09:57:49+00:00): Hallo B-Rabbit,
heißt der Kindergarten nun Waldfüchse Waldkindergarten oder Waldklassenzimmer?
Bitte mal prüfen
Gruß
Geofreund1
B-Rabbit (2023-12-11 20:10:44+00:00): Hallo Geofreund1
der Kindergarten heißt Waldfüchse, ist auch so auf der Website beschrieben. Das Waldklassenzimmer bzw. Waldzentrum kenne ich nur mit dem schon eingetragenen Gelände weiter westlich an der Linkenheimer Allee aber ich weiß auch nicht, ob es sich bis hierhin ausdehnt.
Deshalb kann ich hier leider nicht weiterhelfen.
Grüße
B-Rabbit
marczoutendijk (2023-03-23 20:38:32+00:00): change???
What kind of comment is that?
We are always changing something.
Can you improve on your comments please?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
marczoutendijk (2023-03-23 20:38:06+00:00): change???
What kind of comment is that?
We are always changing something.
Can you improve on your comments please?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
nzwade (2023-03-21 17:41:14+00:00): I realised i broke the road placement so I fixed it in Changeset: 133950619
marczoutendijk (2023-03-23 20:37:32+00:00): change???
What kind of comment is that? 
We are always changing something.
Can you improve on your comments please?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
 
Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
gscholz (2023-03-22 06:14:44+00:00): Hi martin_ferrari85,
your recent edit activity has left behind a significant amount of errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-58.78067&lat=-25.74689&zoom=9&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=133950543

Can you please fix this?

As this seems to be a systematical error, may be you can think about how to avoid this error at all?

If you look closely at you new natural areas you will find, they overlap here and there with other areas, so they are quite inaccurate. May be you can improve this as well to improve the quality of your edits in total.

Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2023-03-23 07:00:52+00:00): Hola martin_ferrari85,
estos errores siguen existiendo, ¿pueden darme su opinión al respecto?
Guido
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-11-12 10:28:21+00:00): Hi, please use building:part=* istead of building when adding separate building parts. This is one building, not 4.
Kayo_33 (2023-11-16 13:08:35+00:00): You're totally right! Thanks for pointing out! Must've been from where did not know better. Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144095771

I am having trouble with properly tagging the emergency staircase (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1096260042). And prolly should also remove the addresses from the building parts. Perhaps should move to the community forum altogether.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-11-17 17:45:54+00:00): The building outline should be also changed to include all of the parts.
Glassman (2023-03-24 17:53:00+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133950740
Glassman (2023-03-24 17:53:24+00:00): I reverted this edit because it does not exist.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133950740
Fizzie-DWG (2023-07-02 00:37:40+00:00): Reverted by DWG due to being copied from G maps

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138008667
SekeRob (2023-03-21 18:02:05+00:00): Just noticed, there are 2 forest relations with the same name of Carvalhais das Serras de Fafe. If they are part of same then maybe a super relation could be put in place.
streckenkundler (2023-03-21 19:54:06+00:00): Erneut: @lberges

was hat @Nakaner dir geraten?

Vergleiche CS https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133891749

Soll ich das extra für dich nochmal wiederholen?
MxxCon (2023-03-23 04:42:25+00:00): Hello.
Please note that you gave the whole relation address of 250 Joralemon St, even to the area that's on State St. That doesn't seem correct.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133951412
silversurfer83 (2023-03-21 19:51:26+00:00): Hi :)
It's perfectly fine to map other places from aerial images. I'd just ask you to square your buildings (the "Q" on your keyboard when an object is selected)

Cheers
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133951414
syntex (2023-03-24 11:05:21+00:00): Nie dodajemy w osm nazw opisowych. Ta droga po prostu nie ma nazwy
syntex (2023-03-24 11:06:16+00:00): Poza tym obiekty są dodane błędnie. Krzywo, niepotrzebnie sklejone ze sobą.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-21 18:36:07+00:00): Thanks! 

Re

> You are a very active mapper since 10 years. What about learning something new and helping yourself? 😎

from https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3606072

Sadly, I have OSM TODO list far longer than I can process so when I spot new issues while already fixing other issues I occasionally create notes
MxxCon (2023-03-23 04:45:15+00:00): Hello.
Please write useful changeset comments. ////// doesn't help other people understand what you are editing.
You mapped a building, in the description wrote a little area. Could you please elaborate what exactly this feature is?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133951733
emersonveenstra (2023-03-29 11:30:23+00:00): Reverting for vandalism, creating a new college on top of an already existing college.
emersonveenstra (2023-03-29 11:33:05+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/134258888
jmarchon (2023-03-21 19:44:02+00:00): Welcome back to OSM!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133952086
Una tantum (2026-07-28 05:37:26+00:00): Ciao Aldeyde, rispetto a node/4762662714 sei sicur* che questo posto si chiami Villa Bernahethi ? a me sembra tanto che ci sia un refuso nel nome
NorthCrab_upload (2023-03-21 19:40:29+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Podana kombinacja addr:city + addr:place jest nieprawidłowa.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9566297049
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9566297051
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9566297052
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9566297053
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9529779306
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9529779310
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9529779311
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9529779317
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9566297050
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9645279748
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9645280576

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1455091880

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
SekeRob (2023-03-21 18:33:17+00:00): This has restored the forest rendering. \o/
orthocircular (2023-03-21 23:06:06+00:00): Hi there, is this not a prison building? Commercial seems like an odd choice for what appears to be jail cells.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133952464
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-26 14:54:34+00:00): Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5180615 ?

Colours are quite surprising here
wolfbert (2026-05-01 07:13:48+00:00): KLG Ameisbachgruppe ist 1140.
danieldegroot2 (2023-04-22 15:49:45+00:00): Hey Anne,

There is good aerial and street level imagery available here; the latter clearly shows a low, triangular stand rather than a high, square one. As such, I've replaced the wikimedia link (2012!) with a Mapillary link. See
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135233612

Regards,

Daniel
emersonveenstra (2023-03-21 20:41:50+00:00): Hi,

There's no indication in either AllTrails or OSM that parking is available for this trail. Is the trail open to the public?
PT-53 (2023-03-22 09:04:39+00:00): MaxiTrofi95,
in diesem CS hast Du verschiedene Gebäude-Namen eingetragen.
Bitte lies Dir dazu folgenden Wiki-Hinweis durch:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen#name_ist_nur_der_Name

Danke und Grüße

PS: 
Für Fragen oder Anmerkungen bitte den Änderungssatz
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133952746#map=18/48.30706/9.24383
aufrufen und unterhalb Diskussion in das leere Feld eintragen.
MichS (2023-03-22 06:13:49+00:00): Hallo.

Bei highway=footway ist foot=yes nicht notwendig.

Welches Schild(er) ist/sind dort aufgestellt? Zeichen 240/241/239/237/... ?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Verkehrszeichen_in_Deutschland

MFG
ValleyCycle12 (2023-03-22 18:22:35+00:00): Die Eigenschaften des Fußweg habe ich angepasst, eine Beschilderung ist dort nicht aufgestellt, dementsprechend habe ich die Fahrrad-Eigenschaft entfernt. Danke fürs sichten!
RicoElectrico (2024-10-30 20:11:31+00:00): Cześć, wg tej uwagi: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3520148 jest to wiata, która wcześniej była tu: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8257401335

Masz jak to sprawdzić?
Syl (2023-05-17 21:40:32+00:00): Bonjour, ce bâtiment n'a pas l'air d'être un supermarché : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1156127917
J'ai aussi supprimé celui-là qui n'existe pas : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10751475418/history
Il y en a d'autres ?
Kalepom (2023-05-17 21:51:54+00:00): Houla, 
Meric Syl pour ta vigilance. J'ai corrigé le bâtiment.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-03-21 19:30:24+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/427566214

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Endres Pelka (2023-03-21 19:54:28+00:00): Dziękuję za uwagę, już poprawiam.
NorthCrab (2023-03-21 20:04:26+00:00): :-)!
MxxCon (2023-03-23 04:50:33+00:00): Hello.
Please note that if sidewalks are mapped as separate ways running parallel to the road, the road should be tagged as sidewalk:both=separate.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133953953
PT-53 (2023-03-22 09:01:49+00:00): Hallo MaxiTrofi95,
Du hast in diesem Änderungssatz (CS) u.a. Firmennamen hinzugefügt. 
Da fehlt jetzt noch der Firmenzweck.
Hier dürftest dazu die passenden Merkmale finden:
Wiki - Craft:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:craft
Wiki - Shop:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:shop
Wiki - Office:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:office

Machst Du das noch?

Danke und Grüße

PS: 
Für Fragen oder Anmerkungen bitte den Änderungssatz
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133954045#map=16/48.3079/9.2379
aufrufen und unterhalb Diskussion in das leere Feld eintragen.