piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Diógenes de Sinope (2023-04-05 18:57:11+00:00): Hello ElefantMapper,

An area that I previously created to represent the 'Morro Bento I' neighbourhood has been removed in this changeset. 

It was removed shortly after another user added tags that were inappropriate for the element in question, and given that it had been around for some time before that, I can reasonably presume that was the motive for the removal. 

However, I think it is excessive to scrap the whole thing on that basis alone. 



Hallo ElefantMapper,

Ein Bereich, den ich früher erstellt habe, um das Viertel 'Morro Bento I' zu repräsentieren, wurde in diesem Changeset entfernt. 

Es wurde entfernt, kurz nachdem ein anderer Benutzer Tags hinzugefügt hatte, die für das betreffende Element unpassend waren, und da es schon einige Zeit vorher existierte, kann ich davon ausgehen, dass dies der Grund für die Entfernung war. 

Ich halte es jedoch für übertrieben, die ganze Sache allein auf dieser Grundlage zu streichen.
Masdha Rio Anggara (2023-03-09 22:27:50+00:00): cancel
Masdha Rio Anggara (2023-03-09 22:28:03+00:00): please cancel
MxxCon (2023-02-27 00:03:25+00:00): Hello.
Shouldn't name:sr be "Централни парк"?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133044128
Srdjan023 (2023-02-27 17:44:02+00:00): "Централни парк" would be translation of "Central Park" but in Serbian language you don't translate names from foreign languages, you write them phonetically in Serbian.*



* Some famous buildings and
structures are still translated like Statue of Liberty (Kip slobode) and  where it doesn't make sense to transcript name.
MxxCon (2023-02-27 18:08:29+00:00): That's the difference between translated and transliterated tags...
emersonveenstra (2023-02-28 12:25:58+00:00): Hi,

In https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15535534 you gave https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/902654314 the 'outer' role, did you mean to give it the 'inner' role?
eggie (2023-02-26 20:43:14+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
RicoElectrico (2023-02-27 10:17:09+00:00): Sprawdziłeś może zmieniając tagi co to jest za obiekt? ;) Podpowiedź: to nie staw ani zbiornik retencyjny.
zVID (2023-02-27 12:16:49+00:00): Basen - na mapie Binga dopiero widać bo Geoportal rozmazuje obiekty strategiczne. Poprawione.
RicoElectrico (2023-02-27 13:45:19+00:00): Dzięki!
Adava Pays d'Aix (2023-02-27 06:58:01+00:00): Bonjour, Pourquoi avoir mis ce "separate" sur le cycleway ? 
Le tag separate indique que l'aménagement est sur un autre chemin sur OSM hors sur l'avenue du four d'eyglun il s'agit d'une bande cyclable donc elle doit être sur la route et pas séparée. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:cycleway%3Dseparate&uselang=fr
infeeeee (2023-02-26 16:05:54+00:00): Így van, tényleg fordítva volt jelölve. 

Ilyen esetben forrásnak a "local knowledge"-t ajánlott inkább: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source#General_sources_commonly_used_by_human_mappers

Látom új szerkesztő vagy, ha további kérdéseid lennének, a magyar közösség elérhetőségeit megtalálod ezen az oldalon: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hungary/K%C3%B6z%C3%B6ss%C3%A9g

Kérdezz bátran ha valami nem lenne világos!

További jó térképezést!
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2023-03-01 03:37:05+00:00): نرجوا منكم عدم إضافة الأماكن الشخصية للخريطة
Allison P (2023-02-26 19:13:18+00:00): Very clever dogwhistle! Surely DWG won't take action against this sort of changeset comment.
mavl (2023-04-23 16:06:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
frydzio (2023-02-28 10:17:02+00:00): Cześć,
'Nowe budynki BDOT' chyba nie jest dobrym źródłem importowania budynków, zwłaszcza tych w budowie. Przykładem jest ten budynek https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1149652434 Dopiero wychodzi z ziemi, nie ma dostępnych planów, nie ma go na ortofotomapie, a jego bryła będzie dużo bardziej skomplikowana i będzie miała 17 pięter https://msmenergetyka.pl/storage/image/core_files/2023/1/27/5e493f089dd60ba4b3ad7e215b49ac04/jpg/msmenergetyka/preview/03_W-20.jpg
syntex (2023-02-28 10:39:54+00:00): Wiem, że te construction to często mają dziwne kształty. Ale uznałem, że mniej więcej zarysy ich mogą być przydatne, jak się je wrzuci do osmu. Jeśli do któregoś masz jakieś uwagi, to możesz skasować.
mavl (2023-04-23 15:53:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:48:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:03:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
gabenarni (2023-02-26 15:02:54+00:00): The name "Piazza d'Armi" is an informal name for the park "Parco Cavalieri di Vittorio Veneto", which is already set as an alternative name tag in the main park area.
mavl (2023-04-23 16:07:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:02:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:12:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:11:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
paganella31 (2023-02-26 20:08:51+00:00): Ciao! Grazie per il tempo che dedichi a migliorare la mappa.
Posso chiederti gentilmente di usare nomi più parlanti nella descrizione delle modifiche? Così è più chiaro per tutti capire cosa è stato cambiato. Grazie ancora
paganella31 (2023-03-27 15:57:54+00:00): Riguardando le modifiche trovo questa denominazione "strada della morte" che chiaramente non può essere ufficiale, dovresti toglierla.

Inoltre il torrente si sovrappone alla strada, sarebbe da disegnare in modo separato. Ho controllato dalle immagini aeree e non riesco a seguire il percorso, può essere che sia interrato per un tratto?

Vedo che stai continuando a usare parole random nei changeset: ti chiedo nuovamente di usare descrizioni più chiare! I tuoi contributi sono importanti, tuttavia se spieghi cosa hai modificato è più facile per tutti.
Se hai dubbi contattami pure, puoi usare anche altri canali come il forum. Grazie.
trentinomapper (2023-04-01 11:33:41+00:00): Il nome "Strada Della Morte" è una denominazione ufficiale.
SomeoneElse (2023-02-26 15:16:13+00:00): Hello again Wibblejunior,
Again, more "Classification changes".  On https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132989049 I asked you to say a bit more about why you are making these changes please do explain.
emersonveenstra (2023-02-26 21:14:10+00:00): Hi,

On https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1149656101#map=18/42.16023/-86.36883 you added the tag "Hole 8=black", could you clarify what that is for?
emersonveenstra (2023-02-28 12:21:15+00:00): Hi,

This changeset created duplicate nodes, could you please fix them?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10694915563 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9416356908 are duplicates, as are https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10694915533 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9907746358

Thanks!
mavl (2023-04-23 16:06:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
Shaun das Schaf (2023-02-27 12:33:28+00:00): Hallo Arne, 

bitte benutze den name-Tag nur für den tatsächlichen Namen eines Objekts, nicht für eine Beschreibung. Dieses Objekt wird sicher nicht offiziell "baumstamm im Wasser" heißen. Wenn du keinen geeignetes Tag findest, der das Objekt ausreichend beschreibt, nutze stattdessen bitte den description-Tag.

Mehr dazu:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen#name_ist_nur_der_Name
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:description

Bitte noch korrigieren.

Danke und viele Grüße
Shaun das Schaf
mavl (2023-04-23 16:01:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:05:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:04:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:57:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:05:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:03:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:06:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:55:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:48:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:11:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
Bienson (2023-02-26 21:48:54+00:00): building=terrace ist für Blöcke an Reihenhäusern gedacht, nicht einzelne Reihenhäuser. Die bekommen building=house

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:building%3Dterrace
Windy (2023-02-26 22:13:51+00:00): Ich hatte in Erinnerung, dass es auch einen Typ "Reihenhaus" gegeben hat und suchte den in StreetComplete. Hab ich mich wohl getäuscht.

Danke für den Hinweis, ist korrigiert.
mavl (2023-04-23 15:53:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
BCNorwich (2023-02-26 15:27:55+00:00): Hi, The market group is called London Central Markets of which Smithfield Market is one. Thus the tagging was correct as Smithfield was drawn and tagged in its own right. I've amended back.

Regards Bernard.
mavl (2023-04-23 15:48:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:59:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:04:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:51:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:48:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:11:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
Hjart (2023-10-12 11:47:39+00:00): Bemærk venligst at Enebærodde er hele den 6 km lange halvø: https://denstoredanske.lex.dk/Eneb%C3%A6rodde
b-holdet (2023-10-12 12:01:37+00:00): Jo, det kan du have ret i.
Men Stednavneregistret siger noget andet:

https://kort.plandata.dk/spatialmap?wkt=POLYGON((597651.39%206153036.73,597651.39%206154243.27,598617.66%206154243.27,598617.66%206153036.73,597651.39%206153036.73))&selectorgroups=admgraens&layers=theme-dtk_skaermkort_daempet_daf+theme-daf_matrikelkort_roed+userpoint&label=Eneb%C3%A6rodde&labelPos=POINT(598048.1000186594%206153640)

Spørgsmålet er hvor Lex har sine data fra, altså om det er bekræftede data fra anden side.
Hjart (2023-10-12 13:04:50+00:00): Trap siger tilsvarende: https://trap.lex.dk/Eneb%C3%A6rodde og f.eks. https://www.visitnordfyn.dk/nordfyn/aktiviteter/natur/oplev-enebaerodde mener også at odden er 6 km lang
osmviborg (2023-10-12 13:05:16+00:00): Og her: https://www.fredninger.dk/fredning/enebaerodde-hofmansgave/
b-holdet (2023-10-12 18:35:32+00:00): Den lange del hedder Hals og endestykket mod øst har navnet Enebærodde.
Jeg tror at Trap har misset noget i deres research. Det er helt sikkert en misforståelse af områdets navne og karakter.
b-holdet (2023-10-12 18:53:53+00:00): Tag gerne et kig på kortet på denne side hos Trap
https://trap.lex.dk/Nordfyns_Kommune
Læg gerne mærke til navnene på den lange odde:
Hals - Enebærodde.
osmviborg (2023-10-12 20:31:02+00:00): https://vis.dataforsyningen.dk/steder/12337669-fa6b-6b98-e053-d480220a5a3f https://vis.dataforsyningen.dk/steder/12337669-fa6e-6b98-e053-d480220a5a3f
https://vis.dataforsyningen.dk/stednavne2/12337669-fa6a-6b98-e053-d480220a5a3f/Drejet
mavl (2023-04-23 16:11:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:06:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:00:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
Trần Thanh Tuấn (2023-05-06 12:44:31+00:00): Xin không gán địa điểm tư nhân lên một đơn vị hành chính như vậy. Cảm ơn.
Jerry_W2k (2023-02-26 20:48:58+00:00): Hej, zapomniałeś zmienić kod pocztowy w Żabce https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4624082888 
Po za tym, Gorzałki w Chojnicach już nie ma?
Damian05 (2023-02-27 11:28:01+00:00): Dziękuje  Jerry_W2k za czujność. 
Na Google Maps punkt Gorzałka w Chojnicach widnieje jako zamknięte na stałe
mavl (2023-04-23 16:08:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:48:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:11:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:49:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:06:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:03:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:49:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:05:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:50:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:59:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:54:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:10:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
bxl-forever (2023-02-26 17:20:14+00:00): Hello,

Why are you mechanically removing apparently valid data, like "network=Astuce" on bus stops?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4397256508/history
Such tags are used to query all bus stops served by a given network.

Did Osmose really ask you to do this?  Why?
Max-Kritic (2023-02-28 10:28:14+00:00): Osmose permet de corriger beaucoup de chose. Pour les bus, il faut utiliser Osmose et OSM Inspector. Le but est de passer à la version 2 du transport. Dans celle-ci les tag operator et network ne sont plus à mettre sur les arrêts, mais dans la relation. Pour le réseau Astuces, j'ai déjà corrigé les lignes 13, 14, 44. voir https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=1.10280&lat=49.40343&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.81&overlays=ptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes%2Cptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes
mavl (2023-04-23 16:10:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:54:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:06:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:12:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:52:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].