piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-21 07:39:49+00:00): Hello!

You used
surface=niet-bestraat2
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1350407713/history

Have you maybe meant
surface=unpaved
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2025-01-12 19:49:36+00:00): Hi, just checking. Was the graffiti removed/cover by insulation?
pilvisus (2025-01-13 01:47:49+00:00): stripped away and then covered with insulation - the exterior's being entirely redone since sometime last year.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2025-01-14 20:55:19+00:00): Thank you for clarification
Glassman (2025-01-12 22:25:53+00:00): #TIP: When removing a business, it a good to leave the address which can likely be reused. The browser editor, iD, has a tool to remove all but the address. Just right click on the business and select the ⋁ icon.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161247881
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-08 05:06:07+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164660392
Glassman (2025-01-12 22:33:39+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161248121
urbalazs (2025-01-12 09:54:19+00:00): Szia bodnorb! Üdv az OpenStreetMap-közösségben! Kérlek, hogy szerkesztés előtt ismerd meg a közösség által elfogadott szerkesztési irányelveket. Ezt vagy az OSM wikiből, vagy a Matrix-csatornánkon való kérdezéssel teheted meg. Adok pár javaslatot az eddigi szerkesztéseidhez. Szerkesztés előtt győződj meg arról, hogy a használt légi felvétel (jelen esetben a Bing) pontosan illeszkedik-e a valósághoz. A FÖMI 2011-2014 jó viszonyítási alap, Magyarországon az a legpontosabb. A térképelemek paraméterezéséhez pedig elengedhetetlen a wiki ismerete. Az italbolt típusa nem lehet többféle, az árusított italokat más kulcsban kell megadni. A parkolónak pedig nem az a neve, hogy „Parkoló”, ez a típusa. Balatonszemes nagyrészt én szerkesztettem a térképet, ezért tudom pontosan, hogy milyen hibák kerültek most be az adatbázisba. Ezért a szerkesztéseidet most visszavontam. De ez ne vegye el a kedved a folytatástól! Tanulásként javaslom a StreetComplete nevű alkalmazást a mobilodra, amely segít belerázódni a szerkesztési folyamatba. Üdv: urbalazs
NeisBot (2025-01-11 17:50:38+00:00): Hi geeman72, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 89% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 3 natural(s)
- 7 waterway(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=161248396
pitscheplatsch (2025-01-15 19:18:21+00:00): Thank you for your private message confirming that the deletions were intentional.

#HappyMapping
somehundred (2025-01-11 17:57:32+00:00): "place=locality" is used if location is uninhabited. In this case your edit is wrong. I encourage you to read the wiki pages of both "locality" and "suburb".

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dlocality
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dsuburb
HellMap (2025-01-11 18:45:17+00:00): What is incorrect about this name in Latvian? It is from official sources.

I asked you to provide any sources at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160441247 for arbitrary tagging changes like this that would conflict with official sources. You have neither replied, nor provided a source, nor explained what is wrong here. You cannot keep changing values against officially-published sources.
HellMap (2025-01-14 10:49:37+00:00): Since you have not replied again, I have reverted your changes.
raldite (2025-01-11 18:15:43+00:00): mantive as tags para descrever a cobertura vegetal e as cercas nos polígonos dos recintos, da forma que estava mapeado originalmente. a maioria é bem uniforme e toda a organização das placas e dos animais é baseada em recintos. 

no entanto, esse esquema é apontado pela wiki como um erro (múltiplos objetos inseridos em um único elemento) e deverá ser corrigido futuramente.
JesseFTW (2025-01-12 22:26:20+00:00): While this generally looks fine, a more descriptive changeset comment would be helpful! Also, you deleted a number of ways then re-created them, making it harder to understand the history -- please try not to do that. In any case, thanks for making the updates!
Tim Grose (2025-02-05 13:47:10+00:00): Is this "road" really called "The Bumpy Road" perhaps by some sign on the ground or more a description of the nature of it which IMHO is not the purpose of the "Name" field
rory_070707 (2025-02-05 14:04:01+00:00): Hi Tim,

Really good question. I don't know what it is called. The change to the Name was not done by me. It was done in change set 159998671 by Hampshire&Devon.

From when I went along it last it is now a much more solid material in places.

However having taken a quick look on google maps and from my memory I can t see anything that suggests its known as "The Bumpy Road" or not known by that name.
Tim Grose (2025-02-05 14:33:43+00:00): Ah thanks! Probably best to ask the same question on that changeset. I am a runner and am active with CityStrides.com where the aim is to try and run all the "public" streets in an area and noticed this one has appeared after a synch with OSM here. Sounds like you can at least go down it "legally" on foot and more so if less stiles but equally feel important OSM isn't full of "made up" names!
Tim Grose (2025-02-06 09:55:47+00:00): PS found https://themovemarket.com/tools/propertyprices/mowlands-farm-frith-end-bordon-gu35-0qr which refers to houses along said road. The postal addresses just seem to refer to the locality of Frith End and not an actual road. Also checked historic OS maps and no road names mentioned.
rory_070707 (2025-02-06 10:10:56+00:00): I would agree, that would suggest that the Lane is called Frith End. However the road coming from the Noth West to the Junction "The Bumpy Road" is on is also called Frith End Road. I would say go ahead and change it. To your main point though, this is a road with a public footpath along it, but its also accessable by car anyway as well hence it has a street view along it. So it would seem you need to run it.
Tim Grose (2025-02-06 11:56:16+00:00): I think "Frith End" is just the name of this general area or indeed "village" as I see has been marked on the map. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2743475436 I've left the same comment on the changeset you suggested but no reply yet but will give it a bit longer. I guess it is possible it is a sort of "nickname" given by those who live there for a road that does not have an actual name. Actually just thought to look on Find My Street and it gives it as "Grooms Farm Lane". Indeed https://www.truemanandgrundy.co.uk/property/grooms-farm-lane-frith-end/ even references it for ap property there. So maybe go with that? You are right it might just give me a reason to go and run it as is a nice area generally anyway. Thanks for your help!
Hampshire&Devon (2025-02-06 12:57:43+00:00): Hello,

Sorry for any confusion caused. You're right that this is an unofficial name given to the lane by locals, since it is an unadopted lane with no "official" name. "Frith End" is the village and "Frith End Road" is a different road to this one. I believe "Grooms Farm Lane" is also a nickname but used only by the owners of Grooms Farm, so I think it would be more appropriate for the road to have no name since more property listings refer only to the village, not road name.
It is a private road, but a registered public footpath, so you can run it and I'd recommend doing so because it connects to some other scenic footpaths as well.
Tim Grose (2025-02-06 20:54:34+00:00): Thanks for the comments. I have made a change to remove the name but put the two "local" ones in the loc_name field separated by a semi colon. This does seem to allow to search for either. All largely based on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Names That said there isn't an example scenario in that where there is no obvious actual name but local one(s). If you have any other suggestions to best tag this please say.
Sakari_N (2025-02-03 15:34:23+00:00): Moro, mikä ajatus noissa terävissä 45 asteen kulmissa moottoriterampin ja moottoritien yhtymäkohdassa on? Yleensä oon tottunut näkemään moottoriteillä rampin jatkuvan aika suoraan kohti tien ajolinjaa. 

Muuten näyttää hyvältä ja olet huolellisesti tagannut destination-tagit yms, hyvältä näyttää.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161249336
Viima (2025-02-03 18:15:09+00:00): Hei, kiitos kommentista. Jyrkät kulmani pohjautuvat wikisivun "Dual carriageway" ohjeistukseen. Wikin mukaan vain fyysisesti erotellut ajoradat piirretään erillisinä viivoina. Eli moottoritien ramppi piirretään ohjeen mukaan vasta liittymäkohdasta eikä hidastus- tai kiihdytyskaistan alusta. Koska ramppi sijaitsee varsinaisen tien vieressä, pitää johonkin tuo risteys tehdä ja siitä kieltämättä tulee aika jyrkkä varsinkin useiden ajoreittien leikatessa samassa kohdassa – parannusehdotukset ovat tervetulleita.
HellMap (2025-01-15 00:19:17+00:00): Hello,

As already mentioned to you many times - please do not use track classification for driveways.
rhhs (2025-01-11 20:41:42+00:00): I can't find out what you changed here... Walking from the south on one of the paths, you first step down on the road (raised kerb), then cross it (informal crossing because there are no markings on the road, no lowered kerbs, etc.), step up on the sidewalk on the other side (raised kerb again) and then go down from the sidewalk down the steps. I think it was correctly mapped. See https://maps.app.goo.gl/R63iZ6CgHnRk1rH4A
BartekChom (2025-01-11 21:38:14+00:00): (OK, if you call the crossings informal, I can agree.) Thank you very much. Walking from the south I would say that there are no steps before the kerb. I am sorry, apparently this was unclear, I was thinking about walking towards the street. Besides, no steps immediately after the kerb - to be honest, I overlooked the sidewalk in the tags. When I see it, I cannot stop myself from mapping it separately. I hope that you do not mind.
rhhs (2025-01-12 09:11:23+00:00): Good idea to map the sidewalk! Thanks
NorthCrab_upload (2025-01-11 18:41:00+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/731185087

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
danieldegroot2 (2025-01-11 20:27:08+00:00): Are these low walls or full-height walls (up to ceiling)?
For full-height wall there is indoor=wall.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:indoor=wall
(ignore image on the right, this is wood frame inside certain walls)
b-unicycling (2025-01-12 05:02:34+00:00): fixed
BCNorwich (2025-01-12 08:07:13+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreeMap.

House 33 is mapped so the node is not needed.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2025-01-12 08:10:24+00:00): Hi, The name is not the house number so I've removed that tag.

Regards Bernard.
danieldegroot2 (2025-01-11 20:36:30+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/842361171
Is it explicitly signed as "Bell Tower"? It seems like descriptive name. It is already correctly tagged as
tower:type=bell_tower
I would suggest removing name tag.
b-unicycling (2025-01-12 05:02:59+00:00): Good point, fixed.
Supaplex (2025-05-31 07:51:29+00:00): 請問中山新松町新城計畫的依據是？
目前現地觀察並未有居民遷走還是店家變遷狀況

會先移除原先變更
pootriarch (2025-01-11 19:13:21+00:00): stockton st doesn't have actual bends until market st, but osm has had a meandering line for it. i am about to survey the market st intersection anyway, as the lanes in osm don't look right
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-31 12:38:59+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12492907160/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop?
pavvv (2025-01-12 01:51:09+00:00): Hello, what is the source of this change?
bdentremont (2025-01-11 19:52:59+00:00): Correction: Source note #4583930 by  Mathieu Bernier + #4554135 from mapbox
elsy1 (2025-01-12 17:16:16+00:00): درود، دوست عزیز متوجه کاری که میکنید هستید؟ متوجه هستید یک منطقه رو تگ محوطه مذهبی قرار دادید؟  اگر توضیح ندید مجبور به گزارش حساب شما خواهم شد تشکر
elsy1 (2025-01-12 17:20:05+00:00): برای اضافه کردن ناحیه مناطق شهرداری باید از رلیشن ها استفاده کنید حتما قبل از اینکه اقدام به ویرایش نمایید اول کسب آگاهی کنید
Glassman (2025-01-12 22:33:31+00:00): The pier is likely not open to motor vehicles, including aircraft. Typically it is just for pedestrians. Also you may want to look up moorings on the wiki. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:mooring
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161252734
Paguro01 (2025-01-27 11:42:25+00:00): Ciao, la rotatoria mi sembra mappata correttamente. Da mia indagine sul posto durante e dopo i lavori direi che è abbastanza difficile mapparla ad occhio. Hai fatto davvero un ottimo lavoro, complimenti! ;-)

(questa non è una review formale)
conradoos (2025-02-03 18:35:44+00:00): The changeset was reverted.
Langlaeufer (2025-01-11 21:44:03+00:00): Hier muss ich dich leider bitten die deine Änderungen auf highway=footway Rückgängig zu machen. Die Übergänge haben eine Radfurt und die Ampeln Signale auch für Radfahrer. Es sind sind somit keine reinen Fußwege.
Msiipola (2025-01-31 18:12:46+00:00): Här fanns en MP med outer=gräsyta och en inner=commercial.
Vid väginfarten delade dessa båda två noder, vilket är ett fel. Outer och inner kan inte gemensamma noder. Jag justerade noder för commercial så att de är skilda från outer. (Se även wiki om MP).
rempshaener (2025-01-12 09:20:27+00:00): Hallo,
deine Changesets sind viel zu groß. Du missachtest die Warnhinweise von iD. Deine Änderungskommentare sind nicht nachvollziehbar. 
Löschungen sind nicht nachvollziehbar.
Bitte prüfe diesen ominösen Pfad: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/709882423.
Viele Grüße
streckenkundler (2025-01-12 15:53:59+00:00): Hei,

auch hier nochmal, bitte äußerste Vorsicht, wenn es um Straßen geht... 

Du hast hier zum dritten mal das Fahradknotenpunktnetz Prignitz beschädigt, das darf nicht sein!

Dein Kommentar lautet: "Änderungen genauere Map für ls erstellen"

ls= Landesbetrieb Straßenwesen Brandenburg? Arbeitest du für den Landesbetrieb, ist das ein offizieller Account? Dann zwingend kennzeichnen.
Weitere Dinge sind schon geschrieben worden. Da OSM ein Gemeinschaftsprojekt ist, solltest du wirklich mal antworten...

streckenkundler
streckenkundler (2025-01-12 16:25:23+00:00): @ELLEzockt168 ich muß noch mal energischer werden... Was willst du mit deinen Bearbeitungen erreichen?

Du hast mit dieser Bearbeitung auch Landuse-MP's massiv geschrottet... 

Ich weiß noch nicht ob man das reparieren kann, Mittlerweile hab ich 63 (!) Bearbeitungskonflikte... 

Folgendes: Ganz wichtig! Zuerst nachrenken, dann antworten und erst mal keine weiteren Bearbeitungen!

Ich werde auch im Forum https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/de/56 auch einen Beitrag dazu starten...

knatschige Grüße...
streckenkundler (2025-01-12 16:47:20+00:00): Beitrag: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/bearbeitungen-eines-neulings-in-der-prignitz/124201

Bitte lesen, beachten, dort antworden und vorerst keine weiteren Bearbeitungen durchführen,

Danke...
Enock4seth (2025-01-12 20:26:07+00:00): Hi, can you clarify why adding building nodes in exiting building areas? Or what are you trying to achieve?  A feature should be represented with only one OSM element https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
Gregory Peony (2025-04-06 02:03:13+00:00): All footprints here are valid and the vast majority are accurate. Thank you for your high quality conrtributions. I think that the C shaped building is actually a rectange with a ^- roof cross section. The T shaped building I think could be better mapped as two footprints becasue I cannot see the same diagonal joints in the roof like the building to its south. I made some modifications to the footprins in this changeset and uploaded them in Changeset: 164572759 & Changeset: 164572787.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161254123
Gregory Peony (2025-04-06 02:29:48+00:00): The footprints here are valid, accurate and appropriately squared. Please continue mapping. Thank you for your high quality contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161254211
Gregory Peony (2025-04-06 02:27:23+00:00): The northern most footprint here is L shaped. I mapped it in Changeset: 164573018. Zooming out tends to give more accurate shape and orientation information. In this project if highways are in the way you can move them.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161254234
Money Moustache (2025-01-11 21:21:10+00:00): Désolé, je me trompe de langue ! Commentaire : Ajouter une clôture à côté du Café de la Gare avec un portail verrouillé
Fizzie-DWG (2025-01-27 02:09:58+00:00): DWG revert - Google Maps used as Source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161801400
mcliquid (2025-01-11 21:56:51+00:00): And China: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1035740131
archie (2025-01-11 22:11:22+00:00): Hej, vad är meningen med att lägga till "bicycle=designated" på den här cykelvägen (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/388474592)? 
Blir en cykelväg ännu mera cykelväg genom den här taggen? Eller kan det tänkas att åsättandet är helt meningslöst?
WWMapper101 (2025-01-12 18:11:38+00:00): Här ser jag faktiskt inget problem med att ha bicycle=designated. Vägen ifråga är trots allt en GC-väg, och om man kollar på andra GC-vägar i området (även de jag inte har ändrat) ser man att även de är taggade med bicycle=designated.
archie (2025-01-12 18:30:02+00:00): Det har diskuterats en hel del ang detta. Det är att våldföra sig på logiken att tagga en väg som är taggad som "cycleway" även med "bicycle=designated"-taggen.
George Sears (2025-01-12 10:57:51+00:00): Hi, I'm a local mapper, thanks for the contribution.
I think the AQP route on OSM needs a lot of corrections if this source is anything to go by: https://www.bicitalia.org/it/routing-gpx?bi_id=97

Unfortunately I don't have the means to survey it myself...
rempshaener (2025-01-12 09:10:40+00:00): Hinweis auf drain
Fizzie-DWG (2025-01-27 02:09:52+00:00): DWG revert - Google Maps used as Source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161801397
rempshaener (2025-01-12 10:43:44+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.
Du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitung gebeten.

ref:
Hier wäre eine eventuell vergebene Hydrantennummer einzutragen. Diese findest du oben rechts auf dem Hydrantenschild.

fire_hydant:diameter
Die Nennweite (80) gehört hier hin.

Farbe:
Bei Unterflurhydranten ist das nicht sooo wichtig, man kann sich den Wert aus Vereinfachungsgründen auch sparen.

Vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag.
Bei Fragen bitte einfach melden.
Viele Grüße
stasiu512 (2025-01-11 23:12:28+00:00): Cześć, jaki jest powód usunięcia postoju taxi przy dworcu?
Marek-M (2025-01-12 12:29:24+00:00): Jeżeli sytuacja z grudnia 2024 nie uległa zmianie, to edycja błędna.
https://www.trojmiasto.pl/wiadomosci/Postoj-taxi-przed-dworcem-tylko-dla-Ubera-n196509.html

Dodatkowo adresy są przypisywane budynkom i POI w budynkach. Oddzielne POI poza budynkami nie powinny posiadać adresu.
stasiu512 (2025-01-12 19:57:05+00:00): Wycofałem zmianę. Umowa z firmą Uber nie została zerwana, https://www.trojmiasto.pl/wiadomosci/Co-nowego-otworzylo-sie-na-Dworcu-Glownym-w-Gdansku-Nowe-lokale-n197612.html
Postój taxi, który dodałeś nie istnieje , w dodatku dodałeś adres do oddzielnego POI tak jak wspomniał wyżej @Marek-M
kadamski (2025-01-13 05:41:48+00:00): Miejsce odbioru pasażerów Uber nie jest postojem taksówek. Po zawarciu umowy z Uberem, PKP usunął znaki D19 i D20, w związku z czym to już nie jest postój taxi.
stasiu512 (2025-01-13 06:05:58+00:00): Jakie masz źródło tej informacji? W artykule wyżej jest zdjęcie na którym widać znak z tabliczką informującą że miejsca są wyłacznie dla Uberów
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-02-17 09:23:45+00:00): The usage of highways as administrative boundary members causes errors such as bridges connected to the highways they're crossing.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-02-17 09:36:40+00:00): https://imgur.com/a/CaydR5Y
archie (2025-01-11 22:06:45+00:00): Hej, på vilket sätt har du uppdaterat genom att lägga layer-taggen (layer=-1) på den här gångvägen (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/324843208)?
WWMapper101 (2025-01-12 18:14:45+00:00): Vägens geometri var av misstag utritad genom lägenhetsbyggnad https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1201007615 - ritar om vägen nu som den ser ut. Tack för kommentaren!
rempshaener (2025-01-12 09:07:39+00:00): Hallo,
magst du hier insbesondere begründen, warum du einen Hydranten um fast 170 m verschoben hast?
Viele Grüße
SekeRob (2025-01-12 14:48:04+00:00): Hi,

v.v https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/200578642 , Apologies for having (accidentally) deleted that waterway hydro works(?) wall. One comment though: Think both are retaining walls so is evident from the aerial imagery, maybe sluice walls, not regular walls. I'd have split the water area into regular bed and the grass cover as grass and maybe flood prone.

cheers
silversurfer83 (2025-01-12 08:24:30+00:00): Moin luk323,

gute Arbeit :)

eine kleine Anmerkung:
an einigen Stellen hast du (und auch jmd. vor dir) die landuse Flächen mit den Brückenkörpern verbunden. Das ist, außer an den beiden Enden einer Brücke, physikalisch nicht möglich und sollte daher auch bei uns tunlichst vermieden werden. Vielleicht guckst du dir das nochmal an.

happy mapping
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161255429
luk323 (2025-01-13 22:01:01+00:00): Dankeschön für den Hinweis!
Ich habe sie jetzt wieder getrennt. :)
LySioS (2025-01-12 10:41:27+00:00): I'm reverting this,

Too many errors and warnings, please pay attention to warnings before uploading changes.
notmyproblem1 (2025-01-13 22:01:36+00:00): hi, may you specify the segments i did error on it?
thanks
waldyrious (2025-01-13 10:46:28+00:00): Hi there. Why did you add "Tilia sp." as the value of the species tag? That designation doesn't specify any species; instead it literally means "an unspecified species of the genus Tilia", and these trees already have genus=Tilia. Am I missing something?
user_5359 (2025-10-12 06:08:25+00:00): Hallo! Du hast zum Knoten der VHS Rhein-Sieg (s. https://www.osm.org/node/8113051302 ) das Tag admin_level=1 hinzugefügt. Welche Bedeutung hat diese Tag (für Dich)?`
431c57 (2025-10-12 13:06:47+00:00): Keine Ahnung. Scheint ein Fehler zu sein.
Vllt. meinte isced.level? Dann wäre es aber „5“.
Level=1 würde passen. Mausgerutscht im Drop-Down.

Generell bin ich mir jetzt nach nochmaligem Nachlesen mit „amenity=college“ nicht ganz sicher. Inzwischen ist es vmtl. eher education=training nehme ich an.
pavvv (2025-01-12 00:26:59+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/248973383
This road should probably stay as primary since it's administratively located in Poland.
Udarian (2025-01-11 23:52:17+00:00): paths inside of the customer facing part of the zoo (around the exhibits) are access=customers because they are for customers, please stop marking these as private.