piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
wilfisher (2023-07-17 12:40:34+00:00): Hi @MxxCon - good question. In this case, I was just syncing up a few errors with the status quo of the rest of the cemetery, but I was wondering the same thing. 

For several ones I've checked out in person, there are "Private" and "No Trespassing" signs at the entrances, but they do seem to function more like "permissive" since nobody checks you in or asks. I referred back to the OSM wiki, which seems to prefer legal access over practical access making me think these should be "Private." I usually traverse these areas by bike, and some (like Green Wood Cemetery in Brooklyn) will actively stop you and make you park your bike to enter, whereas at Mount Olivet in Queens I didn't have that experience. 

What do you think is the right designation?
MxxCon (2023-07-17 15:46:05+00:00): But looking at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access "Introductory examples" section seems to describe situations that match cemeteries pretty closely... At least when it comes to publicly accessible cemeteries like Greenwood, Woodlawn, Washington, Montefiore.

If bikes are not allowed that doesn't mean other types of access are "private".
Noen (2023-07-17 12:49:59+00:00): Er Stangevegen åpen igjen?
Kuba__PL (2023-07-20 23:36:10+00:00): Ja
Kuba__PL (2023-07-20 23:40:08+00:00): Men uten å snu ved Brugata må du kjøre gjennom Esperantogata i Østregate
Noen (2023-07-20 23:41:48+00:00): Så bra! Jeg fjernet gjenværende forbud fra veien.
user_16178067 (2023-07-17 07:46:08+00:00): Ale droga "secondary" nie może tak po prostu się urywać pośrodku niczego, nawet jeśli jest to uzasadnione parametrami technicznymi. Zobacz w jak fatalnym stanie są niektóre drogi wojewódzkie, ale ponieważ łączą miasta i wsie, to mają kategorię secondary. Jeśli tak ci zależy na podnoszeniu kategorii, to daj też secondary na Wąwozowej aż do Al. Ken i Stryjeńskich, bo takich edycji się nie robi.
:-} (2023-07-18 14:24:37+00:00): Poprawiłem to po nim w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138667079#map=13/52.1474/21.0662&layers=N
Yunkers (2023-07-16 07:07:10+00:00): Hej, 
Łącznice z drogami ekspresowymi i autostradami zawsze oznaczamy wyższą kategorią (np trunk_link dla łącznic dróg ekspresowych). Poprzednia wersja była poprawna.
Dzięki
emersonveenstra (2023-07-17 11:35:33+00:00): Hi,

On https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1165957224, you put "voltage:primary" and "voltage:secondary" on this area, these tags can only be used on transformers. Could you please fix this? Thanks!
emersonveenstra (2023-07-17 11:41:18+00:00): Also, you have a lot of name fields with multiple values, which is uncommon. Could you please give your source for these changes?
svansing (2023-07-19 03:07:53+00:00): I will remove the "voltage:primary" and "voltage:secondary".

Many transmission "lines" have two circuits (6 cables).  Each circuit is named for the terminating substations.  Many times, the circuit on one side of the towers has a different termination substations than the circuit on the other side of the towers.  Therefore, there are four names.  "A-B;C-D

https://www.itc-holdings.com/projects-and-initiatives/project-detail/meyer-substation
InfosReseaux (2023-10-22 14:18:03+00:00): Hello

It is more convenient to use power relations to map circuits with according name (and voltage, frequency...) instead of putting them on power ways directly.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6106033
Currently under review: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Power_routing_proposal

It should be similar to bus routes over city streets.

Thanks for voltage:primary/secondary removal BTW
tyfi (2023-07-15 23:45:43+00:00): note #3773063
gkshakhawat (2023-07-16 00:14:58+00:00): S S Bird And Food Place
Monihar Complex,Dakshin Khan Bazaar, Dakshin Khan, Dhaka, 1230.
Baloo Uriza (2024-12-04 14:14:58+00:00): Removing access=private where it's not valid would also be useful on this kind of edit.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138562632
o_andras (2023-07-16 01:03:04+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3688803
tyfi (2023-07-16 01:02:59+00:00): I also used Bing StreetSide in addition to Bing aerial.
tyfi (2023-07-16 01:03:58+00:00): Also also I bumped the classification up to tertiary which appears to be the consensus for MO supplemental state routes.
Udarian (2023-07-16 05:15:32+00:00): when you commit can you please leave a change set comment describing what you did in the commit, for more information see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Fizzie-DWG (2023-12-19 21:44:25+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145308067
tyfi (2023-07-16 02:06:04+00:00): Stream names came from National Map which is public domain by USGS.
o_andras (2023-07-16 02:18:38+00:00): Hit enter by mistake, the description is wrong... Added a roundabout based on aerial imagery that I noticed a few months ago.
dónal (2023-08-06 11:56:50+00:00): Thanks for the edit. Super helpful!
Fizzie-DWG (2023-12-19 21:42:35+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145308013
ChrissW-R1 (2023-07-18 14:15:01+00:00): https://osm.org/note/3786464
https://osm.org/note/3786465
https://osm.org/note/3786478
https://osm.org/note/3786480
ChrissW-R1 (2023-07-18 14:39:16+00:00): https://osm.org/note/3786492
https://osm.org/note/3786502
https://osm.org/note/3786510
https://osm.org/note/3786514
https://osm.org/note/3786522
https://osm.org/note/3786525
https://osm.org/note/3786537
https://osm.org/note/3786539
https://osm.org/note/3786542
https://osm.org/note/3786543
https://osm.org/note/3786546
https://osm.org/note/3786549
https://osm.org/note/3786551
https://osm.org/note/3786552
https://osm.org/note/3786553
ChrissW-R1 (2023-07-18 15:02:07+00:00): https://osm.org/note/3786565
https://osm.org/note/3786569
https://osm.org/note/3786573
https://osm.org/note/3786578
https://osm.org/note/3786580
https://osm.org/note/3786586
https://osm.org/note/3786601
https://osm.org/note/3786606
https://osm.org/note/3786609
https://osm.org/note/3786610
https://osm.org/note/3786613
https://osm.org/note/3786616
https://osm.org/note/3786617
https://osm.org/note/3786620
https://osm.org/note/3786622
https://osm.org/note/3786626
https://osm.org/note/3786627
ChrissW-R1 (2023-07-18 15:10:50+00:00): This is an automated edit, which destroyed many manual work. Please re-check!
ChrissW-R1 (2023-07-18 15:12:51+00:00): Sent PM to the changeset contributor.
ChrissW-R1 (2023-07-21 14:01:06+00:00): In this case the revert script is broken. You also reverted many of my changes, which are in changesets, which are not listed here.
woodpeck (2023-07-21 14:16:53+00:00): Dear ChrissW-R1, I will have a look at it and repair the problems. This was a rather big revert that might have conflicted with other edits.
ChrissW-R1 (2023-07-21 14:19:33+00:00): Its ok, if you will not revert my edits again. In this case I could re-add my changes very quick.
Rukkhadevata (2023-07-16 03:40:54+00:00): Error correction: #138522282
tyfi (2023-07-16 05:09:07+00:00): I added two bridges as well.
philippec (2023-08-02 23:26:54+00:00): Die van Gymnopolis is verdwenen.
Dat is toch niet gebeurd toen ik erbij zat ?
tobiasff3200 (2024-04-07 10:29:16+00:00): Hallo Sven,

vielen Dank für die Änderung und willkommen bei OSM!
Du hast angegeben, dass deine Änderungen überprüft werden sollen. Deine Änderung ist gut, kurzfristige Änderungen, wie durch Baustellen sollen eigentlich nicht eingetragen werden, da die Karte auch auf Geräte geladen wird, auf denen sie nicht oft aktualisiert wird oder weil die Änderungen, wie in diesem Fall, nicht rückgängig gemacht werden. Deshalb vielen Dank fürs Fixen. Anstelle von oneway=no hättest du den Key auch wieder löschen können, da der Standardwert no ist, das ist aber nicht besonders schlimm, behalte es nur bei zukünftigen Änderungen im Kopf.

Happy Mapping
Tobias
arjunaraoc (2023-07-16 11:47:28+00:00): We are not using District suffix for the districts in Andhra Pradesh for example.  it is similar to how a country's boundary is named.  For print rendering the names need to be short as well. You may reconsider your edits in light of the above
Enock4seth (2023-07-16 06:44:31+00:00): fix multiple place nodes and settlement outlines (clicked too quick, no comments :/)
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-07-24 18:32:58+00:00): Looks like you've moved Elva toidujagamispunkt inside the building, but it seems it's just a locker with a fridge outside, or is it not?

https://www.foodsharing.ee/elva.html
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-26 10:17:25+00:00): Hello!

You used
crossing:markings=zebra2
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1189939723/history

Have you maybe meant
crossing:markings=zebra
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?
larz86 (2024-04-26 18:43:21+00:00): Hello, it was a mistake(typo)
I have rectified it in changeset 150552917

Thanks for heads up! Cheers
VA00 (2023-07-20 08:36:48+00:00): Można zamykać: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3334743 ?
WiktorN (2023-07-20 19:42:03+00:00): Można
user_5359 (2023-07-18 09:12:06+00:00): Hallo! Bitte schau Dir nochmal http://www.osm.org/way/306852234 an. Was ist die Bedeutung vom Tag Zum = Bellevue?
PuffinMapper (2023-07-18 09:23:37+00:00): Danke für die Info.
Da habe ich mich vertippt. Müsste jetzt richtiggestellt sein.
eggie (2023-07-16 08:45:13+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
literan (2023-07-16 09:02:09+00:00): точно MCD? не CMD?

https://www.cmd-online.ru/
alexey_zakharenkov (2023-07-16 18:25:12+00:00): Конечно, спасибо.
LySioS (2023-07-22 11:49:48+00:00): Bonjour,
La dénomination sous l'éditeur en ligne d'OSM est trompeuse. Les chemins non carrosables (path en VO) correspondent à des sentiers et sont bien adaptés en forêt.
Les "chemins piétons" (footway en VO) sont plutôt pour des aménagements en ville
dentonny (2024-05-06 21:10:27+00:00): hey Staf,

Ik ben hier afgelopen weekend voorbij gewandeld. Maar een BBQ plaats ben ik niet tegengekomen. Heb je hier meer info over?

mvg
staf (2024-05-07 09:27:57+00:00): Kan ik me niet meer herinneren, waarschijnlijk verkeerd ingegeven.
user_17551983 (2023-07-16 11:38:54+00:00): hallo, weißt du noch, wo die nicht geschlossene stelle war?

falls hier noch mehr stellen problematisch sind, würd ich die aufräumen.
kartler175 (2023-07-17 10:29:21+00:00): siehe https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1xv2
NorthCrab_upload (2023-07-16 08:50:14+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1095544849

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Patr1k_P (2023-07-20 09:36:17+00:00): tu si vymazal existujuce cesty a namiesto nich vytvoril nove, takto sa to ale nerobi, pretoze sa snazime zachovat historiu objektov..treba sa naucit cesty rozpajat a spajat..aj nazov vrstevnicova si si vymyslel
Jakub0509 (2023-07-20 11:53:51+00:00): Ahoj,
mrzí ma, že som niečo domrvil, no verím, že aktuálna podoba, po mojej úprave, je vernejšia realite, než tá predtým. Už si celkom nepamätám, ktoré cesty som tam zmazal, a je možné, že som nekonal úplne v súlade s pravidlami. Ak by ti to nevadilo, mohol by si mi to kľudne vysvetliť, prípadne mi pošli link k pravidlám o správnom postupovaní v týchto situáciách. 
Čo sa názvu ,,Vrstevnicová" týka, určite som si ho nevymyslel. Možno nie je oficiálny, ale v praxi sa používa vo viacerých komunitách, či už medzi lesníkmi, poľovníkmi, turistami, či cyklistami. Táto cesta bola pred pár rokmi rekonštruovaná,  a teraz tvorí jednu z významnejších lesných ciest v oblasti, tak som usúdil, že by prospelo, keby bola označená vlastným názvom. Pred mojou úpravou bola pozliepaná z viacerých úsekov s rôznou kvalitou povrchu, a tak som ju, len chcel opraviť, podľa skutočného stavu.
Ďakujem.
Jakub
Patr1k_P (2023-07-21 17:55:42+00:00): v prvom rade sa treba snazit co najviac objekty upravovat a nie mazat, aby si zachoval historiu objektov...a co je to historia? tak napr. chces zistit nejaku cestu, ktoru niekto upravil, tak otvoris si cez ID danu oblast, kliknes na cestu, ktora ta zaujima, alebo iny objekt a vlavo dole mas zobrazit na openstreetmap.org

...napr. zaujima ta tato https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/335810144....a vlavo hore vidis ze verzia 8, to znamena 8x upravovana a ked rozkliknes historiu, tak si mozes pozriet ake tagy sa menili..

ten nazov oficialny nie je, takze taketo nazvy nepatria teda do name...mozes vyuzit tag description...a co sa tyka tych ciest a ako sa da rozdelit, rozpojit alebo spojit, tak si pozri toto video...

https://drive.google.com/file/d/10IffAMUj_m0asqSLqppg6jvBlL-qeCoy/view?usp=drive_link

...u toho konca videa som to spojil tak ze oznacis obidve cesty cez shift a stlacis C
Patr1k_P (2023-07-21 17:56:27+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/335810144
Jakub0509 (2023-07-21 19:37:05+00:00): Ďakujem za tvoje inštrukcie, budem sa nimi riadiť.

Ten názov cesty mi, ale nedá spať. Trocha som googlil a našiel som verejnú zákazku a územné rozhodnutie na prestavbu tej cesty. V obidvoch prípadoch sa tam daná cesta uvádza ako lesná cesta Vrstevnicová.

https://josephine.proebiz.com/cs/tender/1130/summary

https://www.zlatniky.sk/zasadnutia-oz.phtml?program=51&module_action__0__id_ci=155920&print_demand=1

https://www.zlatniky.sk/download_file_f.php?id=942654

Stačí toto na pomenovanie tej cesty? Prípadne podľa čoho sa mám v týchto situáciách riadiť? Existuje nejaká oficiálna databáza takýchto názvov?

V lokalite sú aj ďalšie cesty, ktoré majú podobné pomenovania a mohol by som ich pridať. Stačí pokiaľ si aj u nich overím ,,oficiálnosť" názvu v nejakých úradných dokumentoch?
Vďaka
Patr1k_P (2023-07-24 13:41:45+00:00): neviem ci to stačí na pomenovanie, väčšinou sú lesné cesty bez názvov, alebo zvyknú ľudia cesty pomenovávat, lebo sa im tak hovorí..to však nie je bohvieaky argument.. väčšinou pomenovavame objekty, pri ktorých je nejaká tabuľa s názvom, trebárs tak ako bežné ulice, ktoré majú nejaký názov, tak tento názov vidíš na ceduli.. v tomto prípade neviem ci tam je tabuľka s názvom Vrstevnicova...keď ti to nedá spávať, spýtaj sa vo fóre
Jakka (2023-07-17 06:16:03+00:00): vind dit vreemd dat een privé weg een officiële straatnaam nog heeft ?
Twitters (2023-07-17 14:39:34+00:00): Klopt vond ik ook. Het bedrijf 'De Coeck', dat hier gelegen is, heb ik hiervoor gemaild (ik ben in afwachting van hun reactie).
Via google maps is wel het hek te zien dat uitkomt op de Boomsestraat (geschiedenis van juni 2017 bevat dat hek zelfs al): https://www.google.com/maps/@51.1040819,4.3324244,3a,75y,244.94h,83.35t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sheMMn69LGEBrCohzw2iTng!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fpanoid%3DheMMn69LGEBrCohzw2iTng%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D322.31473%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu

Via de rotonde (Boomsestraat) is de Laetstraat te bereiken, maar door bord 'privéterrein Camions' verboden.

Van zodra ik reactie heb van het bedrijf post ik het hier.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-08-06 09:38:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 139507782 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed import, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139308759
TaraV (2023-07-18 13:33:54+00:00): Hi, I've noticed that in a couple of changesets you've changed administrative boundaries. In case of relation (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16036532) in changeset 138568034 you've changed it from boundary concerning Licab to one referring to Zaragoza. After this changeset this relation is now broken and has somewhat of difunctional boundary. I've also noticed that in changeset 138569876 you've created relation for administrative boundary of level 6 with single, non-closed way (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16096625). Are you still working on these administrative boundaries or was this an accidental error? 
Thanks, Tara
monuwere (2023-07-19 03:27:18+00:00): Hello. I have noticed it, too. The changes in this changset was broken down into four, I divided it into four because it is the number of other towns that has border with Zaragoza. I will try to fix it. Thank you
gscholz (2024-03-06 07:17:20+00:00): Hi MapeoAlmeria,
your recent edit have (again) left behind several errors regarding duplicate nodes:
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-1.98994&lat=37.46082&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=138570266

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
eggie (2023-07-17 06:55:26+00:00): Tino  De info heb ik naar de adresnode verplaatst. gebruik svp alleen de adresnodes om op bij te taggen.
MVG
eggie
HellMap (2023-07-16 09:21:45+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3302672
eggie (2023-07-16 11:15:43+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback  Alleen een naam en description doet niet in OSM Ook de aard van het bedrijf vermelden.
shop=? 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Kin Sapalot (2023-07-16 13:31:52+00:00): Hoi,
Welkom!

De conventie in Nederland is dat je de naam van een bedrijf niet op een gebouw zet. 

Als je goed kijkt zie je een adres node met huisnummer en een BAG administratie nummer. Die node kan aanvullen met de bedrijfsnaam, type en alle andere gegevens die je nuttig vindt.

Groet, 
Kin
Kin Sapalot (2023-07-16 13:33:29+00:00): Zie de buren Gramser Sports als voorbeeld ;-)
eggie (2023-07-16 18:52:56+00:00): Johan, Kin,
De info heb ik samengevoegd met de adresnode.
De rest is oke nu. 
MVG
eggie
Iko IRM-RV (2023-07-21 03:54:31+00:00): Hallo Sherlina Artanti,
Terima kasih sudah menambahkan data di OSM, namun jika kamu menggunakan JOSM jangan lupa untuk melakukan validasi terlebih dahulu (shift +v)  ya karena saya menemukan banyak warnings seperti bangunan yang tumpang tindih, jalan yang tumpang tindih dll di changeset yang kamu buat
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138571254
user_5359 (2023-07-18 09:06:10+00:00): Hello! Hello! please note that Wikipedia articles themselves have language linking. So it is enough to choose a language under the key wikipedia.
abrensch (2023-07-23 06:25:01+00:00): Hallo Einsjonas,

also zumindest hier am Anschluss Donauwörth Süd hast Du massenhaft sinnlose bzw. redundante Abbiegebeschränkungen hinterlassen. z:b: 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/250826483

Das ist mühsam, die alle wieder wegzuräumen. Was durch Einbahnstrasse schon verboten ist muss man per TR nicht nochmal verbieten.

Gruss, Arndt
philippec (2023-07-16 13:17:27+00:00): Ja, heel goed.
Centimeters gaan meten hoeft niet, schatten is voldoende.
Ik schat 70 en 20 cm van de buitenhoek.
dgmapping (2023-07-16 12:16:54+00:00): Siin läks vist midagi viltu:
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1xrw

Ning Keskküla bussipeatused on ka topelt.
Apirnus (2023-07-18 16:51:10+00:00): Lampidel olevad nimed läksid küll väga nihhu ja on nüüd parandatud.
dgmapping (2023-07-18 18:03:39+00:00): Viide Tallinna Transpordiametile jäi aga endiselt külge :)
Dawid2849 (2023-07-16 14:08:36+00:00): tu chyba powinno być information=map
Volodymyr D-k (2023-08-04 06:13:41+00:00): Masz rację, oczywiście. Czemuś OsmAnd zamiast normalnej mapy podrzuca mapę na placu zabaw.
Poprawiłem.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-07-16 16:56:04+00:00): Hi, you've made a park out of pond. Is this intentional? Was the pond removed? You can always put it back.
Laerco (2023-07-16 17:00:36+00:00): Hello.  The reservoir remained, but it is now in the park.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-07-16 18:33:11+00:00): The park already existed before for 3 months https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1164664554
I think your new park should be deleted and the pond should be restored.
Pikse (2023-07-17 07:37:54+00:00): In any case it's odd to repurpose pond polygon as park polygon, and I agree that if the pond still exists then probably it should be still mapped.

As for additional park being created, that sort of confusion is expected if there are multiple overlapping landuses. That's another reason why within park instead of landuse=grass it'd be better to use landcover=grass (that shouldn't be rendered the same as landuse).

This area is particularly messy as some parts of it have 3–4 overlapping landuses.
dgmapping (2023-07-18 18:09:50+00:00): I reverted the changeset. Pond is clearly visible from latest kiirortofoto: https://fotoladu.maaamet.ee/?basemap=kiirortofoto&zlevel=15,24.81771,59.36011&fotoarhiiv&overlay=tyhi
Langlaeufer (2023-07-16 19:00:41+00:00): Ist Zum Campingplatz wirklich der Straßennamen oder steht da nur ein Wegweiser?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138572934
Hjart (2023-07-19 10:17:17+00:00): Please note that "Abningstieder" is Danish for "Opening hours". This is not the name of this place.
Leonardozwei (2023-07-24 05:00:27+00:00): Thanks for the correction...
eggie (2023-07-16 11:22:54+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
feedback emergency=ambulance_station toegevoegd. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:emergency%3Dambulance_station

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
rumbrummer (2023-07-16 14:46:42+00:00): Hi,
you deleted also the saddle https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3269588212 - was this intended ?
Regards
Langlaeufer (2023-07-16 18:59:38+00:00): Hallo Maus2502
ein Weg der mit Kraftfahrzeugen befahren werden kann ist mindestens eine Zufahrtsweg/straße (highway=service) hier. ggf. mit service=driveway.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138573679
eggie (2023-07-16 14:19:16+00:00): Een deel van het gras heb ik weer teruggelegd
mvg
eggie
Herman Lee (2023-07-16 12:58:13+00:00): 您好，
有些人对这种编辑表示过一些担忧：在简体中文习用区域标注上繁体中文，在繁体中文习用区域标注上简体中文的行为会加大当地mapper维护数据的工作量，且有些名称后来者修改但对应的简繁体名称没有随之修改或修改错误的情况可能会妨害或误导他人，有些mapper提议将已有的小地点（如公交站）的对应的简繁体字段删除，仅保留name与name:zh（在中文使用区使用local的简繁体字形）。
也很好奇您的对应的繁体字形的来源，有些对应过后的字形存在错误或争议（可能您的编辑中并不存在，但是有观察到这种现象）。
现在简繁体的自动转化工具比较发达，您有没有兴趣去完善一下现有的工具或渲染，让地名能够更好地符合看图或用图者的使用习惯。
很希望能够了解一下您的看法。
（本人没有任何强求删除或修改的企图，不会进行大范围的回退或修改，仅作为讨论）
谢谢。
arjunaraoc (2023-07-20 11:35:40+00:00): Please note the names need to use Title case. I have fixed it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/140357442. For more info https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Good_practice
Frans S (2023-07-19 14:25:51+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please tag a highway after drawing it.
I tagged it as highway=unclassified.
Please read this document
About tagging of highways
Please read and follow the tagging rules on this linked document.
Decision tree, which tag to be used for roads
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1S48CEVi3yiAYWhIJu57jtLyv0ZVUbGwJ/view?usp=share_link
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/East_Africa_Tagging_Guidelines
or
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa
Shrestha Shristi (2023-12-07 11:43:04+00:00): Thankyou Franc for making me recognize about tagging, back then I was intermediate mapper. Now, I'll take care of it.
Mazda05 (2023-07-16 12:26:58+00:00): Hello.


http://www.caiga.ru/ANI_Official/Aip/aipsource1/aip/ad/ad2/urmn/1-ad2-rus-urmn-031-031-1.pdf


stopway (SWY) != clearway (CWY)
Mazda05 (2023-07-16 13:29:05+00:00): There is also no RESA