piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
olowpb (2024-07-16 17:10:14+00:00): Dlaczego uważasz, że ten adres jest niepoprawny? Numeru porządkowego nie ma w bazie EMUiA niemniej byłem tam na miejscu aby sprawdzić numerację budynków gdyż nie dawało mi spokoju taka ilość budynków bez adresów. Część budynków ma tabliczki z numerami, część wywieszone kartki. Monitoruje to osiedle ale ktoś chyba nie dopełnił swoich obowiązków w UM Radzionków.
NorthCrab (2024-07-16 19:22:55+00:00): Nie uważam aby był niepoprawny, jest tylko zduplikowany :-) W tym przypadku należy usunąć punkt/węzeł.
AndresDuhour (2024-07-18 11:38:34+00:00): Buen día!
Respecto de los enlaces que se cambiaron, el criterio que se aplica es que llevan el tipo de enlace que corresponde a la vía de mayor jerarquía. Ya sea para entrar o para salir. De esta manera, un enlace a una autopista siempre va a ser motorway_link, ya sea que conecte con otra autopista, con una vía trunk, primary, etc. Te dejo una tabla con esta información. Y voy a tratar de ir corrigiendo algunos cambios. Saludos! Andrés.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:OpenStreetMap_Highway_links_table_between_different_highway_types..png
Bartek93ZGL (2024-07-18 20:31:02+00:00): Dlaczego zmieniłeś ulicę Ogrodową w chodnik? Niemal, że zawsze rozdrabniasz zmiany na dziesiątki to jeszcze takie błędy popełniasz.
martin-kokos (2024-08-01 16:28:00+00:00): Hi. Thank you for improving the map. However, please don't fill in name unless its a proper name. Please, see a guide here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide
I've corrected some things ( you can see my changes here https://osmcha.org/changesets/154701745 ) that you may have been done by accident so please check them. It would be great if you could connect the path to other roads. Thanks again and happy mapping.
map per (2024-07-16 17:54:12+00:00): Wegen review_requested:
Die Änderung sieht gut aus, danke!
Ondřej Lopatka (2026-06-21 10:27:33+00:00): Here, there is not a traffic sign node2685542799 what was the source?
Friendly_Ghost (2024-07-19 18:34:47+00:00): I think this counts as a descriptive name, which shouldn't be in the name tag.
Ahmad-0772 (2024-07-19 12:33:46+00:00): Hello little_maper,
May I ask what source you used to make this road at 37.17640, 43.01104 into a two-sided road. I checked there are new images from Maxar dated to 07-11-2024 did you use them?
Regards,
Ahmed
little_maper (2024-07-21 07:41:49+00:00): Hello Ahmad-0772;
Thank you for reaching out.
The user who made this road is 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/farhadGuli
Link of changeset:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151303446
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153826573
i only added the construction tags
and the Maxar SecureWatch Imagery 2024-07-11 only cover
the part of west Zakho - Amedi road and showed the highway is under construction
at 37.170531564206655,43.02715330337342.
Regards
little_maper
GeorgeKaplan (2024-08-08 06:36:41+00:00): Bonjour, attention vous avez laissé les attributs de hackerspace sur les anciens locaux https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/197223536
Dimitar155 (2024-07-15 20:54:50+00:00): Изглежда че ремонта е отложен за неопределено време, виж https://www.mediapool.bg/remontat-na-sofiyskata-ulitsa-opalchenska-beshe-otlozhen-v-posledniya-moment-news361161.html. Върнах промяната.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153989441
Anastasiya_Vakulich (2024-11-26 05:23:40+00:00): #mapbox_roads_attributes
mtmail (2024-07-24 08:43:16+00:00): Hello
Thank you for adding the clinic to the OpenStreetMap database.
Can you correct the wikipedia and wikidata tag? If the place doesn't have a wikipedia page it can be deleted. Can you add the zip code (currently it's set to the city name)?
All the best
derloris (2024-08-14 17:05:41+00:00): Hello Kookykooky! You changed same access information for paths in Hallstatt to "private" although the paths are still public. So probably some anonymous user had given you a wrong hint. The best way in such cases is to make a note, so that local OSM users can check if the given information is correct or not. User gerhard81 checked it and now reverted the paths to public access, so now it's correct again. https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4372247 Thanks!
Kookykooky (2024-08-15 04:27:16+00:00): Thanks for the heads up, we got a message from the alleged owner who doesn't want the public to walk around. We'll see if the person calls again. We do not have the opportunity to personally explore this place and evaluate the situation personally.
Thank you
Have a nice day :)
CurlingMan13 (2024-07-15 22:32:39+00:00): You requested a review of this edit.  I have reviewed your changeset and with the exception of a minor typo in the hours, this changeset looks good.  Best of luck with the new business.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153958337
literan (2024-07-23 17:31:21+00:00): вы поставили ворота на перекрестки дорог. Такого быть не может в действительности, на перекрестках ворота не ставят. Попробуйте еще раз, более точно
Anastasiya_Vakulich (2024-11-26 05:24:00+00:00): #mapbox_roads_attributes
pitscheplatsch (2024-07-15 15:53:38+00:00): Hello Fabi Fuu, and welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits, particularly those concerning the names you've added or modified.

It seems that some of these names are a bit unusual.

#NameCheck
Anastasiya_Vakulich (2024-11-26 05:24:17+00:00): #mapbox_roads_attributes
AlkalIn (2024-08-16 10:56:26+00:00): Hi Jordan Franck,
You have deleted a series of forest tracks in this changeset (153959972) without providing explanation. Can you tell me the reason?
I checked again in the field and these still exists.

AlkalIn
AlkalIn (2024-08-16 11:20:39+00:00): I just undeleted these ways. Please let the community know on which basis you delete ways. I see that you have deleted many forest ways in other changesets. Please revert these changes if these were not based on the knowledge that these ways no longer exists. Note that forest ways (footways) are not visible on satellite imageries since these ways are hidden under the trees (this is different from forestry/logging tracks that can be driven with a car). You have to visit the place yourselves to digitize the way and monitor its state.
Jordan Frank Mystère (2024-08-16 11:54:44+00:00): Hello, I understand, I'm going to fix it. But these ways are invisible with the satellite image, the project on which we are working (Cameroon Urban Platform) requires the digitization and control of the important roads visible on the satellite image. I will try to reconstruct them. Thank you for your understanding.
AlkalIn (2024-08-18 10:29:48+00:00): Thanks Jordan. The features in OSM map do not have to be visible on satellite images, they just have to exist. Satellite images do not show everything. Many rainforest tracks in Cameroon have been added to the map with the help of field GPS survey.
I have already undeleted some of the ways you have removed. But there remain many ways to undelete.

Please also discuss this with the members of the Cameroon Urban Platform project.

Happy mapping to you,
Alkalin
jeslop (2024-07-15 14:25:21+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153975250
grzegorz75jan (2024-07-15 08:58:28+00:00): :) Thx
Gregory Peony (2024-07-19 17:25:07+00:00): Try to stick to your task area and keep uploads logically and spacially consistent. Please square buildings after tagging them in iD editor. Press h or ? for a list of keybinds and shortcuts.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153961009
Gregory Peony (2024-07-19 17:29:01+00:00): All building footprints in this change-set represent buildings in imagery, good job.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153961009
Gregory Peony (2024-07-19 17:27:56+00:00): You correctly identified all buildings in this change-set, well done.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153961183
CurlingMan13 (2024-07-15 22:30:03+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM.  You requested a review of this changeset.  Looks like a good start.  Couple pointers, "Q" can be used to square the building after you draw it.  The name of the city should be capitalized to "Laurens".  Same thing with state to "SC"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153962028
CurlingMan13 (2024-07-15 22:30:56+00:00): Looks like you already came back and squared it!  Keep up the good contributions and let me know if you have questions or need help!  :D
Gregory Peony (2024-11-06 21:34:24+00:00): All building footprints here are valid and appropriately squared. I think that WAY: 1301467973 should actually be a quadrilateral and that it just has a darker section of roof. This appears to be the case when cross referencing ESRI.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153962111
Mammi71 (2024-08-11 20:06:02+00:00): Hallo CamperVan56, Du hast dem Campingplatz ein leisure=playground zugefügt. Jetzt ist es kein Campingplatz mehr sondern ein Spielplatz. Was war Dei neigentliches Ansinnen?
silversurfer83 (2024-07-16 07:30:57+00:00): Hi :)

mit den Zugangsbeschränkungen musst du vorsichtig sein. Du hast hier gerade die Wege für ALLE Verkehrsteilnehmer auf Landwirtschaftlich beschränkt. Wie ist denn die *genaue* Beschilderung der bearbeiteten Wege?

(wenn du auf die exakten Eigenschaften guckst, die du gesetzt hast, steht da jetzt "access=agricultural" und access ist in der Hierarchie ganz oben. Wenn dann keine Ausnamen durch weitere Werte gesetzt werden gilt das für alles. In der Regel ist es feiner ausformuliert und da stehen dann Verkehrszeichen wie VZ250 mit Ausnahmen. Das bezieht sich dann aber auf vehicle und nun hast du auch den Fußverkehr verboten...)

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153962748
TrickyFoxy (2024-07-15 13:41:10+00:00): 👋 Вы рисуете мосты поверх дороги, и получается дорога над дорогой. Вместо этого разрежьте линию в нужных точках (клавиша X или в правой кнопкой мыши)
Fizzie-DWG (2024-07-22 23:09:04+00:00): Reverted by DWG for vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154283526
Fizzie-DWG (2024-07-22 23:09:05+00:00): Reverted by DWG for vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154283526
Fizzie-DWG (2024-07-22 23:11:59+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16491
aTarom (2024-07-15 12:59:19+00:00): reverted, Google products are proprietary and must not be used as source
mwtp3 (2024-07-15 17:09:28+00:00): Update: there is chance new footpath/cycleway be created when new housing development at Block BB of master plan, this would create a shortcut to Main Street at Station Rd further south.
VisibleSouth (2024-09-22 14:25:32+00:00): Iitapa Grave Road (common name) oder Iitapa Gravel Road (description)?
ChrissW-R1 (2025-04-05 21:15:53+00:00): Please check https://osm.org/note/4480679
pitscheplatsch (2024-07-15 11:29:16+00:00): Reverted
pitscheplatsch (2024-07-15 11:29:55+00:00): Please don't add fictional data!
RicoElectrico (2025-02-26 21:21:42+00:00): Cześć, tu na pewno jest rollercoaster? :)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1301501787
MarcinLeitner (2025-02-27 08:15:16+00:00): On funkcjonuje w okresie wiosenno-letnim. Na zimę jest demontowany. Tylko jak to oznaczyć?
pitscheplatsch (2024-07-15 11:28:56+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153967457
pitscheplatsch (2024-07-15 11:29:58+00:00): Please don't add fictional data!
pitscheplatsch (2024-07-15 11:28:43+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153967443
pitscheplatsch (2024-07-15 11:30:03+00:00): Please don't add fictional data!
ivanbranco (2024-07-16 09:23:24+00:00): Hi rupertmaesglas,

was correct before. wikimedia_commons=* files have a syntax to be followed as wiki. In this case it should be "wikimedia_commons=File:Glogfach Lead Mine.jpg", not "wikimedia_commons=https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Glogfach Lead Mine.jpg"

is the same logic we apply to wikidata (we tag =Q123, not =https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q123 and wikipedia (we tag =en:Example, not =https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Example)