piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
andrewsuzuki (2023-08-28 04:36:01+00:00): No need to explain, I do the same all the time (roughly aligning trails with strava + garmin), but yeah in this case it was just multiple parallel paths in close proximity, which could have been seen with aerial imagery since there isn't tree cover there. Fixed by adding way 1202683830 if you want to see. Obviously on the heat map that would just show as one big blob, and I'm not sure the garmin is always accurate enough.
Also check out the "CT ECO Shaded Relief" elevation layer -- it can be far more accurate than Strava or modern gps for aligning hiking trails.
a_runner (2023-08-28 12:19:34+00:00): Yea I see what you mean now with the path you added. Thanks for the recommendation, Ill check out that CT ECO shaded relief layer next time too.
docjay (2023-05-25 20:28:57+00:00): Nice work in here! Are you open to double-check on the aerial imagery alignment for these additions? I've been finding that images from Bing (and others) are not well-aligned in the Chania area. For reference, I used an offset of 6.18, 5.37 in iD for this same area.
Falsernet (2023-04-30 18:20:48+00:00): + added speed camera relation
Dawid2849 (2023-04-30 19:03:57+00:00): Dzięki za uzupełnienie moich edycji :D
Dodko (2024-01-30 17:37:06+00:00): Neúplnú adresu radšej nedávať zbytočne to zdržiava aktualizáciu.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1167585154/history
MarcoR (2023-04-30 19:49:49+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto!

Ho corretto il numero di telefono e il tipo di struttura (da hotel ad agriturismo).
Se conosci altri dettagli dell'attività o delle zone circostanti non esitare ad aggiungerli (basta che non copi da altre mappe).

Buon mapping,
Marco.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-04-30 19:00:12+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o miejscowości.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1167590667

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Diego Krein (2023-05-14 21:28:13+00:00): Sr. Nicolá Val, gracias por colaborar con OpenStreetMap, le quería pedir que confirme si efectivamente en ese lugar funciona realmente un cajero o usted quiso mapear otro objeto y no encontró la etiqueta adecuada, gracias.
mavl (2024-11-13 10:14:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159083843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible sources - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16857].
mueschel (2023-05-02 10:23:59+00:00): Hi,
you introduced new 'amps:HV' tags here.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2693743686

The amperage of some installation is usually given in the 'current' tag. 
But the values you put here don't much the rating / voltage numbers. Could you check that?
silversurfer83 (2023-05-02 19:54:47+00:00): Hi
du ziehst gerne mal die Info über einen POI (Point of Interest) von einem eigenen Punkt (node) auf das den Punkt umgebende Gebäude. Das finde ich unglücklich, da in einem Gebäude auch gerne mal mehrere POIs vorhanden sein können und sich die Info des POIs häufiger ändert, als das Gebäude. (hier die Avenarius Apotheke). Viele Kollegen sind der Meinung, dass es besser ist, POIs als eigene nodes innerhalb der Gebäude zu erfassen.

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135550821
quecksilberkartograph (2023-05-02 20:04:22+00:00): In Ordnung. :)
Langlaeufer (2023-04-30 20:58:45+00:00): Hallo, bist du dir sicher mit der Kreuzung. Da ist eine Ampel und eine Haltelinie und eine Fußgängerfurt im Luftbild erkennbar. Eine Ampelkreuzung mit Fußgängerquerung ohne Ampel wäre nicht zulässig.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135550884
mnitrmnitr (2023-04-30 21:38:01+00:00): Hi, Hintergrunf war folgender Fehlerhinweis https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3663163
Wir nehmen noch den Hinwisgeber mit in die Diskuussion rein.
mnitrmnitr (2023-05-02 12:41:07+00:00): Bislng keine Rückmeldung vom Kollegen.
Am nördlichen Bürgersteig sehe ich im Luftbild keine Ampel, am südlichen steht eine. Vermutich orientieren sich Radfahrer und Fußgänger an den Lichtzeichen der Hauptrichtung und bewegen sich dnann auf ihren Spuren.
Langlaeufer (2023-05-02 14:28:50+00:00): Ich muss demnächst nach Laatzen dann fahre ich da mal vorbei
Langlaeufer (2023-05-02 14:42:08+00:00): Die Ampel an der Nordseite dürfte sich in Bing unter der Baumkrone verstecken. Auf den ESRI-Bildern lässt sich der Schatten erahnen. Auf google (2023) sind beide Ampeln deutlich zu erkennen. Mir reicht das als deutlich Hinweise auf eine Ampel. Ich stelle sie wieder her bis nachgewiesen wird das diese Ampel abgebaut wurde.
skogsgubbe (2023-05-02 17:08:47+00:00): Moin!
Ja, da bin ich mir sehr sicher! Ich fahre dort jeden Tag 2 mal mit dem Fahrrad vorbei. Keine Ampel, sondern nur die Masten.
Langlaeufer (2023-05-02 17:18:44+00:00): Betrifft das nur die Fußgängerampel oder die gesamte Ampelanlage
skogsgubbe (2023-05-02 17:54:15+00:00): Das betrifft die gesamte Anlage.
Langlaeufer (2023-05-02 18:37:22+00:00): Dann mach das ganze auch Sinn. Danke
Dodko (2023-07-15 19:02:25+00:00): Do telefónneho čísla nepridávaj lomítko.
Nemeň dohodnuté názvy pošty.
https://groups.google.com/g/osm_sk/c/afglwDyRtBM/m/KGd1-IjvAQAJ
BCNorwich (2023-05-03 08:11:36+00:00): Hi, I've just removed another 22 duplicated sections of footpaths. Could you please be aware that this is happening and try to avoid duplications? Thanks.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2023-05-02 11:52:32+00:00): Several sections of duplicated highways were removed.
whb (2025-06-13 13:47:04+00:00): Guten Tag,

zumindest dieser Doppelpoller wurde inzwischen in einen einzelnen Poller umgebaut und es wurden Bodenmarkierungen aufgebracht:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10858726990
Den anderen Poller habe ich leider nicht überprüft.

Viele Grüße
whb
jcr83 (2023-05-01 07:45:45+00:00): Bonjour,
Je ne suis pas d'accord sur votre changement de highway=service vers highway=track sur l'île du Rouveau. En effet, c'est bien une voie de service qui relie l'embarcadère au phare, et utilisée pour la maintenance du phare. Ce n'est ni une piste agricole, ni une piste forestière.
Dino Michelini (2023-05-01 16:51:26+00:00): Ciao, ma secondo te "Sentiero non mantenuto" è il name? Non è che per caso confondi il concetto di nome e descrizione anche in italiano? Forse è il caso che prima di metterti a mappare leggi la wiki di OSM...(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Nomi#Il_nome_%C3%A8_unicamente_il_nome)
ChehrehBargi (2023-05-03 17:24:09+00:00): Thank you for solving user hacks @yashar turanli.
He also vandalized change packages 135653578 and 135559293 and 135498406 and 135295182 and 135041207 and 134963872 and 134846631 and he has also done the same vandalism in the cities of Tabriz, Urmia, Miandoab, Zanjan and other cities in the northwest of Iran.
rohieb (2023-04-30 20:28:25+00:00): Habe vergessen, Bing als Quelle für den Parkplatz anzugeben.
avinet_ua (2023-04-30 21:17:01+00:00): all wikipedia tags starting from "ru:" articles were replaced by related "uk:" articles in wikipedia as they are more relevant and correct and actual
osmviborg (2023-05-01 06:34:13+00:00): Hej. Når du tegner cykelstier, så brug gerne wiki- vejledningen. Den beskriver bla. at cykelstier gennem bymæssig bebyggelse bedst tagges på selve vejen f.eks. 'cyckelway=lane' https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Da:Cykelstivejledning
aixbrick (2023-05-01 08:52:17+00:00): Hallo,
die Räumlichkeiten gibt es noch oder gibt es sogar eine Nachfolge?
Gruß
Mapper6974 (2023-05-01 12:48:03+00:00): Hallo,
ja die Räumlichkeiten sind noch vorhanden. Ein Nachfolger ist nicht zu erkennen.
aixbrick (2023-05-01 13:48:36+00:00): Danke für die Rückmeldung. Dann bitte zukünftig ein https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix verwenden. Damit kann die Historie erhalten werden (falls es einen Nachfolger gibt) und andere Mapper tragen die geschlossene Praxis nicht wieder neu ein. Ich habe das nun gemacht: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135574736.
Mapper6974 (2023-05-01 14:01:12+00:00): OK danke für die Info
Dino Michelini (2023-05-01 16:50:33+00:00): Stesse considerazioni del changeset  #135552585 ... confondi il concetto di nome e descrizione. Forse è il caso che prima di metterti a mappare leggi la wiki di OSM...(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shelter%20type=basic%20hut?uselang=it)
Dino Michelini (2023-05-01 16:48:37+00:00): Ciao, ma secondo te "Sentiero non mantenuto" è il name? Non è che per caso confondi il concetto di nome e descrizione anche in italiano? Forse è il caso che prima di metterti a mappare leggi la wiki di OSM...(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Nomi#Il_nome_%C3%A8_unicamente_il_nome)
mnitrmnitr (2023-05-01 09:02:43+00:00): healthcare=physiotherapist ?
user_14063915 (2023-05-06 16:00:00+00:00): Dat ist seit 5 Jahren so drinnen
mnitrmnitr (2023-05-06 16:06:43+00:00): Und Benjamin Rupnik stimmt noch? Hat der umgesattel von Psychologie auf Physiotherapie?
snopas24 (2023-04-30 21:03:09+00:00): *Vietnamese website
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-05-12 07:34:20+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1006566613/

what kind of surface is there?

Flat-machined sandstone ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface%3Dpaving_stones ) ?

Is it cut stone but not entirely flat and not entirely covering surface? ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface%3Dsett )

Sandstone pieces, not flattened at all ? ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface%3Dunhewn_cobblestone )
goodidea (2023-05-16 14:17:56+00:00): I had to go there again and look for the situation (yesterday) ... And I even had to split the path ... Because half of it is surface=stepping_stones (in the grass) + material=sandstone (stepping_stones is a new value for me … I only knew it with ford=stepping_stones) and the other half is surface=paving_stones (which then gets paving_stones:material=sandstone and material=sandstone should be removed if I understood it right).

By the way: I checked another place yesterday, a large park with lots of changes by your mechanical edit (bot). And there, in 99% of all cases (> 90 ways), I had to change material=sandstone to paving_stones:material=sandstone  (because it was ALWAYS surface=paving_stones – except one case where steps were a mixture of sandstone plates and granite sett – I decided to set only surface=paved here. Mixed surfaces are also not very nice to tag ...).

And other mappers here in the region have started adding surface tags to paths tagged with material=sandstone, but have NOT changed the material specification from material=sandstone to paving_stones:material=sandstone in the case of surface=paving_stones. This special case is not very pleasant and again gives rise to discussions and inconsistent tagging and perhaps necessary corrections. Not very nice ...

And this case is VERY common (with sandstone, which is very common in my region). 

I checked it with Overpass-Turbo. Results of ways which consist of sandstone (from today):
– 98 ways with surface=paving_stones
– 2 ways with surface=stepping_stones

Unfortunately you can't add pictures here in changeset discussions, I could send you some from yesterday with sandstone paths/footways and steps. Or I could post them in the discussion https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/type-of-stone-in-surface-surface-granite-and-similar/9424. Should I do this?

Another note: I think the tag surface=sett will NEVER apply to a sandstone material, because sett stones are always made of of harder stone material (granite, basalt?). If sandstone, then the normal case is a "flat-machined sandstone PLATE" (larger plates or pieces of sandstone, while sett stones are normally much smaller stones). And at least here in my region you would never call a way with sandstone plates a "sett way", even if it's not 100% flat (but also the german translation of "paving stones" wouldn't be used with irregular formed sandstone plates, you would call it perhaps a "Sandsteinplattenweg" = "sandstone plates way", so I am not 100% happy with the tagging surface=paving_stones + paving_stones:material=sandstone. Here another value like surface=sandstone:plates – similar to concrete:plates – might be better in a semantic sense and easier to understand for mappers! IMHO.)

Perhaps this should have been taken into account before the mechanical edit took place ... 

And I saw the discussion on community.openstreetmap.org too late – for me it goes much too fast until facts are created and a mechanical edit with a bot takes place etc. But I'm also pretty slow at following discussions, I have to admit.
goodidea (2023-05-16 14:28:55+00:00): @Mateusz Konieczny: Small addition/idea: Maybe you could set up a second (recurring) bot that changes the cases surface=paving_stones + material=* to surface=paving_stones + paving_stones:material=*, or removes material=* if material=XYZ AND paving_stones :material=XYZ are set (and the values are the same)? And who sets a fixme or note if the 2 values are different?

This special case with the material at surface=paving_stones isn't very pretty...
V-Li (2023-05-04 06:13:16+00:00): Hallo,

du hast eine Begutachtung gewünscht bei deinem ersten Beitrag. Erst einmal herzlich willkommen und danke für deine Ergänzung. Das sieht alles schon recht gut aus, aber der Name der Firma ist laut Webseite nur ISF Elevator GmbH, die Ergänzung, was sie gewerblich machen kannst du in einem description-Tag mit aufnehmen.  Auch die mehrsprachigen Einträge solltest du entfernen, da sie nicht wirklich einen Mehrwert darstellen.

Bei Fragen kannst du auch im Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/) stöbern, dort sind viele Erläuterungen und Hilfen zu finden.
MxxCon (2023-05-03 01:48:30+00:00): Hello.
Many of the buildings you deleted contained nycdoitt:bin tag which allows us to uniquely identify that building in NYC's DOB database to retrieve their metadata. If that building no longer exist it's generally best to rename that tag to old_nycdoitt:bin= to help facilitate finding the BIN of the new building.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135554203
LightningCloud (2023-05-04 05:02:00+00:00): Oh, I'm so sorry, I did not realize that. Is there any way for me to undo my edit?
MxxCon (2023-05-04 05:21:26+00:00): You could revert your changeset completely or you can look at this changeset in osmcha and look at the tags of the deleted buildings to transfer them.

(Also in general, if possible it's better to update existing features with the current data rather than delete and create new. Updating features preserves their history, which can be useful if at some point in the future to look back at what changed.)
danieldegroot2 (2023-05-01 10:48:14+00:00): See also
- https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=10219277312795705
- https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=2119242708360519
Ropino (2023-06-16 09:34:15+00:00): Hi,
highway=10 ?
Awo (2023-06-16 16:31:11+00:00): hehehe Thanks
scanning error, actually it refers to the label height (m).
;P Thanks for the warning.
Fixed it.
watmildon (2023-05-01 23:39:51+00:00): landuse=residential is not used for buildings and can be removed.
trellis (2023-05-02 15:44:13+00:00): Thank you.
avinet_ua (2023-04-30 22:52:52+00:00): all wikipedia tags starting from "ru:" articles were replaced by related "uk:" articles in wikipedia as they are more relevant and correct and actual
cbhackmeyer (2023-08-25 21:09:43+00:00): I walk past here quite often and have never noticed a spring. Last time I passed by I looked around and couldn't find one. Can anyone clarify the source for this edit?
DJ Cane (2023-08-26 02:00:57+00:00): Based on on-site surveying. It appears to be intermittent and small, mostly manifesting as a persistent muddy area on and right above the trail. Last time I noticed mud on the trail right here was early June and it has been dry since. I come past here regularly and will watch to see when it comes back after the fall rains begin.
cbhackmeyer (2023-08-26 05:05:45+00:00): Oh, interesting. Thanks for clarifying.
Robhubi (inaktiv) (2023-08-07 18:43:54+00:00): Why did you delete the hotel tags?
NW757 (2023-08-10 00:04:51+00:00): That was inadvertent. I have updated with the brand-specific tags now.
Robhubi (inaktiv) (2023-08-10 18:47:07+00:00): Hi,
I'm not sure I understand your answer correctly.
I see the following issues in your changes:

A) Object hotel complex 1085451485.
A1) Addition building=yes
The campus-like complex consists of buildings, roads, car parks, forest, sports facilities ... Tagging the whole thing as a building is nonsense.
A2) Deletion of leisure=resort and replacement with tourism=hotel
This is not correct, as Domes Aulus Zante is a resort and not a hotel. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dresort for the distinction. 

B) building 289523874 and 10 other buildings
B1) Changing building=hotel to building=yes
What is the point of replacing a correct specific tag with an unspecific one?
B2) Deletion of tourism=hotel
This would mean that it is no longer used to accommodate hotel guests. Do the guests all sleep on the beach?

Resume
Only the change of the brand is correct. All other changes do not make sense. I will revert CS 135555547 soon. Is there anything against it?
NW757 (2023-08-10 22:34:38+00:00): No issue with changing the tags as you described. Go for it.
Frank Peng (2023-04-30 23:06:52+00:00): It's unknown if user eschaper1 is still alive today. That user did not explain why he/she dragged this power pole node. Anyways, the dragged power pole node been reverted.
Frank Peng (2023-04-30 23:20:25+00:00): It's unknown if user eschaper1 is still alive today. That user did not explain why he/she dragged this power pole node. Anyways, the dragged power pole node has been reverted.
muralito (2025-08-12 18:35:54+00:00): Hola. leisure=fishing no shop=seafood.
❤️‍🔥 (2023-05-01 06:41:57+00:00): hey, i think if you create a super route, you're still meant to keep all the tags on the original routes. otherwise it breaks lots of apps that don't understand superroutes. 

Since this is more of a network than a mega-route, I think the usual approach is to use a tag like https://wiki.osm.org/Key:cycle_network (see http://taginfo.geofabrik.de/australia-oceania/new-zealand/keys/cycle_network#values for some examples)

what do you think?
CodyNZL (2023-05-01 08:06:27+00:00): Sorry, I don't understand what you're asking. Happy to accept help with this. How would you then see the entire network?
❤️‍🔥 (2023-05-01 09:12:58+00:00): sorry, what I meant is, it's helpful to keep tags like route=bicycle on the individual relations too, which I see you've just added back, thanks

regarding how you would see the whole network - for most networks it's unfeasible to create a super-relation (E.g. all ATMs in NZ or all state highways), so the usual approach is a query like 
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1uq5 or 
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1uq7

in small cases like this, there's probably no harm in keeping your superrelation, as long as the individual relations still have the correct tags
felipeeugenio (2023-05-01 00:44:00+00:00): Hola
Por favor no cambiar los nombres de los locales.

saludos
dankarran (2023-05-01 09:40:39+00:00): Maybe shorten the River Douglas water area way (186130913) to end before it goes underneath, leaving the basic river way (38430283)?
mentor (2023-05-01 13:26:50+00:00): I think the problem is really the man_made=pier and amenity=parking fighting.
dankarran (2023-05-01 16:28:44+00:00): Ah ok. By the way, do you know if there are connections across the car park to The Tongue and/or the jetties? I can't quite make it out from the imagery.
bkil (2023-05-01 20:27:07+00:00): Tisztelt közreműködő! Az addr:housenumber kulcsba csak a számot tüntetjük fel és nem írunk utána pontot. Az opening_hours értékének a szintaxisa nemzetközileg egyértelműen beolvashatónak kell lennie (azaz nem lehet benne olyan, hogy Sze., Csü., stb.), a wikiben olvasható https://wiki.osm.org/Key:opening_hours A készpénzelfogadás Magyarországon alapértelmezett, így azt csak akkor tüntetjük fel amennyiben nem elérhető.
Andrea Musuruane (2023-05-01 16:00:16+00:00): Ciao, per favore, controlla quello che importi da mapwithai! Ci sono degli edifici che non si possono vedere. Grazie!
infeeeee (2023-05-02 07:49:21+00:00): Szia! Üdv az OpenStreetMapen!

Ezzel a szerkesztéssel mi volt a célod?

A 3/B házszám elmozgatása véletlen lehetett, de a trafó elmozgatása? Ha jól tudom nem jellemző, hogy áthelyeznek ilyeneket, ugyanazzal a számmal. 

Ha az is véletlen volt, akkor ezt az egész szerkesztésedet visszavonnám.

Ha további kérdéseid lennének, a magyar szerkesztő közösség elérhetőségeit megtalálod ezen az oldalon: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hungary/Közösség

További jó térképezést!
infeeeee (2023-05-05 11:51:03+00:00): Szia, mivel nem válaszoltál, ezt a változáscsomagot visszavontam itt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135738445
Diacritic (2023-05-01 09:20:01+00:00): Hi,

As per the other comments, this is not correct. Properties are addressed as Dandenong Road, and the signs have both names.

Reverting as per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Roads#Dual_Road_Naming.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135556656
skipperoo (2023-05-01 09:38:01+00:00): Hi,

Not all signs in the area show Dandenong Road such as the signs at Clayton Road and Westall Road and all redirection distance signs show Princes Highway only. And I will also argue that not all properties are addressed as Dandenong Road. Ikea Springvale, Autobarn Clayton, Zone Bowling, Centrecom, Crocs Playcentre, Nandos Clayton and a few others are actually addressed as Princes Highway, not Dandenong Road. You're more than welcome to check their websites to see for yourself but I think the map should show users both names.
Diacritic (2023-05-01 11:05:49+00:00): Hey Skipperoo!

Thanks for the reply.

Firstly, I 100% agree with you that the map should show both names. Unfortunately, one of the limitations of the default OSM renderer is that only the value in the "name=" field is rendered. Ideally, the 'name' and 'alt_name' field should be rendered.

The signage along this section is inconsistent, yes, but most of the signs I've seen look like this https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=272912654578868

where both names are shown. This is the same as how other dual names roads are signposted. 

Lastly, with regards to addressing; the source I am using for addressing is the Vicmap data, which is the official, "authoritative" source for addresses. These stores might choose to use an address other than the official property address (c.f., shops that advertise their address as "the corner of x and y"), but the underlying property is still assigned Dandenong Road.

Happy to explain further if you like.
infeeeee (2023-05-02 07:43:47+00:00): Szia! Üdv az OpenStreetMapen!

Bezárt éttermeknél, üzleteknél  a disused: prefix használata ajánlott a pont törlése helyett. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused:*

Tehát elég lett volna, ha csak az shop=musical_instrument címkét átjavítod disused:shop=musical_instrument-re, így már nem jelenítik meg a megjelenítők. Ez azért is hasznos, mert ha később más üzlet vagy étterem nyílik ugyanott, akkor nem kell új pontot létrehozni, és visszakövethető lesz az üzlethelyiség története, mi nyílt minek a helyén.

Legközelebb eszerint járj el kérlek.

Ha további kérdéseid lennének, a magyar szerkesztő közösség elérhetőségeit megtalálod ezen az oldalon: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hungary/Közösség

További jó térképezést!
Diacritic (2023-05-01 09:19:16+00:00): Hello Skipperoo.

As per the Australian Tagging guidelines, thje local name should be used in these dual naming situations.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Roads#Dual_Road_Naming

Further, your contention that "all street signs show the Princes Highway name" is incorrect. There are many street signs which use the Lonsdale Street name. I have reverted your changes.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135556690