piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2023-03-12 09:21:13+00:00): Hello. I reviewed this changeset as well.
You also mapped the shadow of a house with this as part of a house in some cases.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133570222
Frans S (2023-03-12 09:18:58+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. However ! You forgot to square each rectangular building. !

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133570292
jpennycook (2023-03-11 23:41:07+00:00): description truncated - should have ended: "split junction at Watery Lane/Bathingbourne Lane from survey August 2022 - it's a staggered junction and challenging when busy"
hoserab (2023-03-13 18:42:16+00:00): Hello Smidster,

No offence, but why would you change the streets in a central business district to "residential"? Other mappers have made these changes before, and every time I've rolled them back. See for example https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/204201287/history. I've changed that road segment back **three times now**. The last time I commented on my changes: "roads in Downtown Calgary passing by >10-storey office towers could scarcely be considered 'residential'."

Does this seem "residential" to you: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=51.051541861318&lng=-114.07534042028&z=18.81389736801481&pKey=226950208791650&focus=photo ?
Viajero Perdido (2023-03-13 21:45:46+00:00): The unfortunate term "unclassified" keeps on giving, doesn't it?  As most of us know, it's a perfectly valid classification, but newcomers see it as "needs to be fixed".  It's a UK-ism we're stuck with.
hoserab (2023-03-14 21:54:55+00:00): Huh, I never really considered that people keep thinking highway=unclassified "needs to be fixed"...

Eventually I'm sure it'll change (I'd put my money on it being renamed "minor"); after all, we did eventually get rid of the pedestrian crossings named after zoo animals...
pitscheplatsch (2023-03-12 13:05:06+00:00): Hi.

Could you use the comment field of your created changeset for describing your map edits? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Thanks.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
felipeeugenio (2023-03-19 23:16:52+00:00): Hola Marcelo. Que es lo que intentan hacer que hacen prohibiciones de virajes en U en una calle en si misma. Es algo que hacen los maperos nuevos con ID. no sé porqué. Hablemos por el chat
SomeoneElse (2023-03-19 14:06:27+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM!,
I've filled in a gap in the cycle route https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9579#map=19/54.87486/-1.37514 and moved the gate so that it's on the service road - hope that's OK
Any questions, please don't hesitate to ask.
Best Regards,
Andy
pertile (2023-06-09 11:51:00+00:00): Esta ruta no está terminada, no corresponde que le pongas motorway con access=no sino construction
SomeoneElse (2023-07-01 13:09:37+00:00): Hello,
I was wondering how to interpret the "wheelchair" = "nolive_music=yes" tag on Upstairs @ Ronnie's here?
Cheers,
Andy
witen (2023-07-01 13:37:31+00:00): Hi Andy
Sorry it's a typo, it's missing the new line.
I've corrected it.
SomeoneElse (2023-07-01 13:55:20+00:00): Thanks!
Mundilfari (2023-03-12 06:38:37+00:00): Hey there - What are these foot=no restrictions based on? Like are there actually signs stating that it is forbidden for pedestrians to use the roadway now? Last time I checked that wasn't the case, and per the IL rules of the road, it is legal for pedestrians to use the road in areas where sidewalks and shoulders don't exist (as is the case on this stretch of Ogden).

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:foot%3Dno
jmarchon (2023-03-12 19:37:46+00:00): Are you sure this road is closed in both directions? I was here a couple weeks ago and it looked to be open in the westbound direction. I may be mistaken, though.
Xanadu_Contractor (2023-03-12 20:40:54+00:00): You may be right, I haven't attempted to drive it westbound recently, only eastbound unsuccessfully.
jmarchon (2023-03-13 00:01:46+00:00): Funnily enough, me too! I'll go ahead and fix it, if you don't mind.
Keep up the good work, and happy mapping!
jmarchon (2023-03-13 00:13:22+00:00): Should be better now. Let me know if you see something that could be improved.
Xanadu_Contractor (2023-03-13 00:16:14+00:00): Slapped one-way on it real quick so the map won't try to route people eastbound.
jmarchon (2023-03-13 00:22:39+00:00): I've already added a conditional oneway restriction to signify that the road is currently closed in one way. The value for oneway= should stay "no" for maps that don't update often.
Xanadu_Contractor (2023-03-13 00:25:22+00:00): My bad, I don't know much about the more advanced road specifications. Feel free to set it back.
jmarchon (2023-03-13 00:30:22+00:00): No problem, we all learn new things every day. 
This is also sort of a borderline case, with the road being closed for multiple months. But I think it is better this way.
Thank you
Martin Axiomer (2023-09-24 08:41:32+00:00): Ich kann zu dem NSG um die beiden Inseln in der nordwestlichen Ecke des Zwenkauer Sees keinerlei Informationen finden. Wo ist dieses definiert?
rskedgell (2025-03-24 04:07:14+00:00): Where the Erie Rail Trail crosses Ash Street, the crossing ways ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1153622962 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1153622957 ) are tagged as highway=crossing rather than (e.g.) highway=cycleway + cycleway=crosIng. As highway=crossing is only valid on a node, this breaks routing in Garmin and other OSM-derived applications. I don't know what type of highway or access tags would apply over this crossing, but please could you update accordingly?

This is how OSRM fails to traverse the crossing for pedestrians:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_foot&route=41.0415134%2C-73.9182722%3B41.0412039%2C-73.9180442#map=18/41.041313/-73.918526

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dcrossing
"This tag is only used on nodes. If a crossing is also represented by a way, tag the way with a different highway=* value corresponding to the kind of path that crosses the street, for example highway=footway footway=crossing for a pedestrian crossing."
jonorossi (2023-03-22 12:18:14+00:00): Hi, you're mapped a horse track with highway=unclassified. The iD editor has a preset and it's documented on the wiki. You should instead use the following:

leisure=track
sport=horse_racing
gscholz (2023-03-18 06:26:42+00:00): Hi Cubano153,
your recent activities have left behind a big amount of errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-78.74075&lat=21.82808&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=133572928

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2023-03-18 06:26:51+00:00): Hi Cubano153,
your recent activities have left behind a big amount of errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-78.74075&lat=21.82808&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=133573063

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2023-03-18 06:28:19+00:00): Hi Cubano153,
your recent activities have left behind a big amount of errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-78.74075&lat=21.82808&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=133573106

Can you please fix this?

Can you please also educate yourself about meaningfull changeset comments?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Kind regards
Guido
GOwin (2023-03-12 05:21:37+00:00): Good job! Thanks.
Russ McD (2024-11-29 03:24:07+00:00): I see many residential streets have been changed by User 8221, to "living streets".  Having looked at some of these while recently in Dalat, these streets DO NOT conform to the guidance in both global and Vietnamese Wiki's.
The majority of these do not have shared access for pedestrians and vehicles, and the original tag of residential was correct.
Its true that there are a number of ways that only motorcycles can physically drive down and in reality, access is shared with pedestrians, but this does not apply to the larger streets where vehicles are visible.  In this case, perhaps alley with the access tags of motor_vehicle=no, motorcycle=yes would be more appropriate ? Or even consider a path/footway where the width is limited.
I strongly urge 8221 to review & revert these changes, where applicable.
8221 (2024-11-29 06:37:04+00:00): Thanks
NorthCrab_upload (2023-03-12 04:30:16+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/841683558

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
SomeoneElse (2023-06-05 23:35:12+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10316517329/history just looked like spam to me.
jnighan (2023-11-06 18:13:52+00:00): Hi, "service=yard" should not be added to the main line running through the yard. I have removed the tags you added to the main line in the Danbury yard.

Source:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Dyard#How_to_Map
RailandSea (2023-11-06 18:32:21+00:00): Main line ends south of the Danbury Platform right before CP 424 signals.  Everything north of the platform to end of track is Other than a main aka yard track and mechanical track.
jnighan (2023-11-06 18:46:30+00:00): The "main line" here isn't based on the physical characteristics; the main line is the route that travels into and out from the yard. The main line is clear here. Service=yard is omitted from main lines because at high zoom levels, the Danbury Branch needs to render as connected to the Maybrook Line/Tilcon Siding tracks.
jnighan (2023-11-06 18:47:26+00:00): That is part of the role of service=* on rail lines: for renderers to understand that service lines are auxiliary to main lines, and should not be rendered at higher zoom levels.
RailandSea (2023-11-06 19:24:35+00:00): oh okay i understand now that makes sense
jnighan (2023-11-06 20:02:34+00:00): 👍
emersonveenstra (2023-03-13 12:17:39+00:00): Hi,

This is not a valid use of route relations, relations are not supposed to be categories (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations_are_not_categories). Would you please remove this invalid relation? Thanks!
TheSwavu (2023-03-13 00:56:01+00:00): Seems to be OK. Maybe some sort of iD issue?
ovruni (2023-03-12 07:23:16+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambios se han agregado varios puntos sin etiquetas, lo cual sugiere que son partes de alguna importación, ¿existe alguna fuente de esto?
Saludos
ovruni (2023-03-12 07:35:08+00:00): Hola, este conjunto de cambios similar al anterior miles de puntos sin etiquetas, los cuales se han completado recién en el conjunto de cambios siguiente, existe alguna fuente para esta importación?
Saludos
LockOnGuy (2023-03-13 12:40:02+00:00): Thank you for adding this! I forgot to add it to this part! much appreciate it! :)
little_maper (2023-03-13 14:30:12+00:00): Thank you
ChizuKatsu (2023-03-12 13:53:52+00:00): 町道高岡線の長蔵橋は合瀬川の工事により付け替えが実施されていましたが、完工しておりますでしょうか。
2022年2月10日に現地確認しましたが、仮設橋梁で共用されていることを確認しております。
また大口町の告示資料では令和4年7月20日以来、長蔵橋が完成したことを示す告示は無かったと記憶しております。
https://www.town.oguchi.lg.jp/secure/13344/2022075.pdf

確認頂き、コメント頂けると助かります。
Srdjan023 (2023-03-12 12:35:49+00:00): Mogu da pitam što si obrisao zgrade da li je bila greška ili?
VladaZR (2023-03-21 17:38:23+00:00): Уписао сам реалне бројеве. Само никако не могу да упишем улаз број 5. Он је измеђи броја 5а и 8.
VladaZR (2023-03-21 17:43:37+00:00): Е сад, ивде су бројеви мало компликовани. Неки бројеви се воде на улицу Јована Трајковића, неки на Петра Драпшина, а ова три улаза доле се воде на Панчевачку.

Тако бројеви 1, 3, 5 ,5а, 7, 9, 11, 13 се воде на улицу  Јована Трајковића. 

Бројеви 2, 4, 6, 6а, 8, 10, 10а се воде на улицу Петра Драпшина.

Бројеви 39, 41, 43 су у Панчевачкој улици.
TheSwavu (2023-03-12 08:04:21+00:00): Wrong comment. should be adding building tag to w597173308
SekeRob (2023-03-13 18:21:00+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM,

I've got a really hard time believing how the roundabout at the top of Avenue Mal de Lattre de Tassigny is mapped now. Many warnings with your change set which I think warrants a review by a local experienced mapper if this change set passes muster. A service way on top of a street is certainly no good.

cheers
Patchanka (2023-03-13 19:15:11+00:00): bonjour
au delà du rond-point qui effectivement a un soucis comme l'indique @SekeRob, vous avez supprimé un nombre très important de points d'intérêts : commerces, parking vélos, arbres, passages piétons....
Je vais annuler ces changements.

Vous pouvez re-tester de contribuer mais en faisant peu de changements avant d'enregistrer, et en décrivant les modifications faites (par exemple : "suppression de la boulangerie qui a fermé définitivement").

Voici quelques liens utiles pour débuter sur OSM :

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques
(le wiki est la référence en ce qui concerne la manière de cartographier les éléments)

Les 10 cOSMandements : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/images/8/87/Les_10_cOSMandements.pdf

Le forum FR : https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/
N'hésitez pas à visiter la catégorie Nouvelle Aquitaine où vous trouverez des infos sur les réunions du groupe local Pays Basque Sud Landes (prochain rdv à Ondres le 7 avril - n'hésitez pas à venir !)

bonne soirée
flohoff (2023-03-12 10:45:47+00:00): Moin,
du hast hier auf einer masse von Golfplätzen das sport=golf entfernt.

Gibts da einen konsenz zu diesen (pseudo)mechanical edit zu machen?

Flo
geozeisig (2023-03-12 12:45:12+00:00): Hallo,
leisure=golf_course beinhaltet (impliziert), dass es sich um den Sport Golf handelt. Es sollte nicht noch zusätzlich hinzugefügt werden. Seht auf verschiedenen Wiki-Seiten so.

Gruß Dieter
flohoff (2023-03-12 13:15:27+00:00): Das ist aber was anderes als mehr oder minder großflächig das zu entfernen.

Und ich kann gleich auch noch irgendwas ins Wiki schreiben. So authoritativ ist das jetzt auch nicht.

Deshalb gibts ja die absprache das großflächige änderungen vorher abgesprochen werden.

Flo
Frans S (2023-03-13 14:43:28+00:00): 
Hello. Thanks for mapping on this difficult task.
I would advise you  to start mapping (learning) on simple tasks.
About mapping of tall apartment blocks or high buildings

Mapping of tall buildings differs from standard buildings. Because the imagery is taken at an angle, you will see both the rooflines and also the side of a building. 
How do you map such a building?
Map over the rooflines and lastly slide the mapped building to the footprint.
Please adjust wrong positioned buildings as well
This video shows how that is done.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1V5-bADsYiffCD9bo6l64YOdTvmKqMGry/view?usp=share_link

And.... don't forget to square each rectangular building.

Best regards and keep mapping
jmarchon (2023-03-12 18:23:01+00:00): Welcome back! Happy mapping!
gscholz (2023-03-13 06:33:02+00:00): Hi abebayehuz,
this changeset has left behind a lot of errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=38.84037&lat=8.99955&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=133578062

It seems to me you tried to add a public transport line. Plse educate yourself about how this is properly done:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation#Bus_route

You may also like to educate yourself about how to add proper changeset comments:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Kind regards
Guido
monotar (2023-03-12 15:55:52+00:00): was heißt zukünftig? Wenn der Weg jetzt noch da ist, sollte man ihn noch nicht löschen!
Wander-Lux (2023-03-12 16:55:43+00:00): Der Wanderweg ist definitiv weggefallen. Hatte mich nicht eindeutig ausgedrückt.
Mit besten Grüßen Wander-Lux
Wander-Lux (2023-03-12 17:07:54+00:00): Ein Wanderweg sind in diesem Bereich neu entstanden. Es sind noch Restmarkierungsarbeiten mit Wegmarken zu machen. Wenn alles fertig ist, werde ich die Strecke des neuen Rundweges in OpenStreetMap eintragen. Ebenso gibt es in diesem Bereich noch weitere Wanderwege "aktive" Wanderwege, die in OpenStreetMap noch zu übernehmen sind. Das wird noch erledigt. Bin Wegewart, deshalb der Kenntnisstand. Das nur noch als Ergänzung. Deshalb ist der Wegfall vom Collmer Rundweg auch nicht so tragisch.
monotar (2023-03-12 17:14:43+00:00): ok, dann weißt du ja wie es aussehen muss. Wenn du Hilfe bei Relationen brauchst dann kann ich dir helfen. Ich weiß das den Wermsdorfer Wald lange niemand bearbeitet hat, da ist mit smoothness, surface usw. sicher vieles zu aktualisieren. Tu dir auch keinen Zwang an Wege oder Wegabschnitte zu löschen wenn sie nicht mehr da sind oder im Grunde praktisch zugewachsen sind. Grüße
Wander-Lux (2023-03-12 17:23:55+00:00): Wollte mit meinen Korrekturen nur eine überflüssige Datenüberflutung  beseitigen und Platz für aktuelle Wege usw. schaffen. Schön, wenn ich auch andere Mitstreiter in der Region habe, die mir Tipps geben.
Iko IRM-RV (2023-03-20 08:11:51+00:00): Thank you for contributing to OSM, but I see from this changeset that you just broke geometry in Narutal wood W/1034088901 and W/1037713162, could you please fix this?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133578185
Rica Zamora Duchateau (2023-03-20 09:08:38+00:00): Hi @Iko IRM-RV, thank you for reaching out and my apologies for breaking the geometry of these natural wood features. I came across these recently while mapping roads and saw that they weren't matching the land use appearing on the satellite imagery (Maxar), in some cases crossing over settlements, etc., so ended up removing them as it didn't look right. Is this something you'd be able to revert?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133578185
Iko IRM-RV (2023-03-20 09:36:40+00:00): Hello, @Rica Zamora Duchateau
appreciate your explanation. Yes, I can revert it. Is it okay if I revert this area? Or maybe you have more knowledge about this area and want to add more detail based on your local knowledge?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133578185
Rica Zamora Duchateau (2023-03-20 10:58:03+00:00): Hi @Iko IRM-RV, sure, please revert it!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133578185
Dodko (2023-03-12 19:44:13+00:00): Adresa už existuje v budove, tak sa nepridáva duplicitne aj do bodu POI
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/979800656
Tapet (2023-03-17 19:45:14+00:00): Hallo, wie bereits bei Changeset 133596749 kommentiert, bitte nur Informationen in OpenStreetMap eintragen, die überprüfbar sind und nicht die Privatsphäre von Personen verletzten.

Probleme bei diesem Changeset, die ich rückgängig gemacht habe, sind unter anderem:
- Das Eintragen von Informationen über Privatpersonen.
- Das Eintragen eines gefällten Baumes (?).
- Die Änderungen des Highway-Tags für die Fahrradstraße zu highway=cycleway (siehe dazu das OSM-Wiki) und weitere nicht nachvollziehbare Änderungen der Tags der Querverbindungen dieser Straße.
- Das Löschen des WAZ-Büros, obwohl es vor Ort weiterhin ausgeschildert ist.
- Die Änderung eines bestehenden Namens zu einem falschen Wert.

Bitte unterlasse solche Änderungen in Zukunft und gib für Deine Bearbeitungen eine Quelle an.
sbudde-siegel (2023-03-17 19:55:32+00:00): Die Querungen in der Bochumer Str. sind keine Einbahnstraßen.
Es handelt sich um eine Fahrradstraße mit getrennten Fahrbahnen!
Der "gefällte Baum" ist ein örtliches Wahrzeichen, Treffpunkt (Bänke) und Geocaching Place.
Welche Namensänderung soll falsch sein?
Nicht jede Info ist im Internet zu finden, sondern nur vor Ort!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Wenn du keine Ahnung von der Örtlichkeit hast, dann höre auf meine korrekten Änderungen zu kritisieren oder unqualifiziert zu kommentieren.
bxl-forever (2023-03-12 11:14:08+00:00): Hello,

Good practices in OSM is to use lifecycle prefixes instead of deleting nodes when an activity is gone.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history
(Unless the place has been walled and will never again host any activity.)

I undeleted the node and tagged it as a vacant activity.
Bigon (2023-03-12 12:13:35+00:00): This really looks like a house, not an office building. It's definitely not clear to me whether a new activity will open here..
silversurfer83 (2023-03-12 10:10:45+00:00): Hi there :)

could you please elaborate? You changed 337 nodes in a CS covering Germany, Denmark, Sveden and Norway and neither OSMCha or achavi will properly load the changes to show what you did.

Cheers
silversurfer
Neuwieder (2023-03-12 12:40:14+00:00): Hi, danke für Deine Aufmerksamkeit!
Bei einer kleinen Änderung mit Vespucci  an einem Moor in Schweden (lediglich den falschen Tag landuse=forest gelöscht) hatte ich übersehen, dass ich eine ungespeicherte Änderung an einem Pfad in Deutschland noch offen hatte. mehr nicht. Es ist aber beides so richtig. (dabei versehentlich verschobene Pukte habe ich inzwischen korrigiert.)

Hi, thanks for your attention!
When I made a small change with Vespucci to a bogin Sweden (I just deleted the wrong tag landuse=forest), I overlooked the fact that I still had an unsaved change to a path in Germany. not more. But both are correct. (I have now corrected the points that were accidentally moved.)
silversurfer83 (2023-03-12 14:49:33+00:00): Thanks for the speedy reply and clarification :)

That happens to the best, no worries. 

Happy mapping
silversurfer83
jqngarcia (2023-03-13 09:04:54+00:00): Bon Dia, Andy

Veig que estas editant lineas de bus de  tarragona amb l'editor web (Id), només recomentarte que ho facis amb el editor d'escriptori JOSM, ja que modificant lineas que es solapen estas trencant d'altres, ho pots comprobar en aquest validador 

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=1.29701&lat=41.10762&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=ptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes

Salut i Mapes, JQN
pyrog (2023-09-07 12:54:49+00:00): Bonjour Gauthier,

L'itinéraire 42-48 est un doublon de 47-8 (avec une référence erronée).

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15591357
https://openstreetmap.org/relation/15570788

Je te laisse corriger.

Cordialement,
Yves - Groupe OSM Plein Air 

https://t.me/osmpleinair/38425
pyrog (2023-09-07 13:01:53+00:00): Tu ne connais peut-être pas l'outil d'analyse des réseaux points-nœuds ?

Il montre 130 erreurs dans le réseau : 
https://knooppuntnet.nl/fr/analysis/cycling/fr/France:Somme/facts
mike140 (2023-03-12 12:44:02+00:00): Ви впевнені що автостанція Путивль знаходиться саме тут: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10729484705 ? Також, в Україні назви пишемо українською