piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-07 20:52:34+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Podana kombinacja addr:city + addr:place jest nieprawidłowa. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, usuń addr:place i zastosuj kombinację addr:city + addr:street. Jeśli nie, pozostaw tylko addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2341123984
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2341124294

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2341131356
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/397110967

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
divaddivag (2025-10-08 08:25:55+00:00): Bonjour, pour rappel le commentaire que je vous ai adressé (sic) il y a 1 an sans réponse et surtout sans corrections: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153669381

Bien à vous
user_5359 (2025-11-16 17:59:17+00:00): Hello! You have added a lot of relations which, as far as I can see, only have the tags
climbing=area
name=...
site=climbing
sport=climbing
type=site
but no nodes or paths. May I ask what the purpose of these collection relations is?
johnysvo (2025-11-16 18:32:47+00:00): Hello, 
It’s work in progress. The relations are sandstone rocks which need to be populated by nodes (climbing routes). See openclimbing.org for more context.
Regards,
Jan
user_5359 (2025-11-16 18:46:48+00:00): Hello Jan, please have a look on https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Relations_are_not_categories.
Is there a reason why the nodes could not be added? The nodes should actually be present in OSM, shouldn't they?

I 'm also open to a bilateral discussion.
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2025-10-08 13:43:08+00:00): Zaten işletmenizi 9 ay önce eklemişsiniz. Bkz: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12529091727

Lütfen SEO amaçlı spam değişiklikler yapmayınız. İkinci kez eklediğinizi ve spam etiketlerinizi sildim. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173005538
felipeeugenio (2025-10-08 11:08:55+00:00): En este caso, La foto bing parece ser bastante mas antigua que la esri. El Construmart tiene ahora todo un edificio acoplado en la parte posterior.

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172976553
felipeeugenio (2025-10-08 11:05:06+00:00): Hola. Veo que estás mapeando con Bing. Prueba con Esri. A veces está mejor alineado y me da la impresión de que Concepción está mapeado con Esri.
El cuál foto es mas exacta es todo un tema. Quizás, Si estás interesado en seguir mapeando, debieras empezar a unsar trazas strava para elegir con qué mapear.

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172976865
gonzalocandiay (2025-10-08 12:37:16+00:00): Hola! Tienes razón, lo cambié a Esri y calza con el del edificio de al lado. Intentaré actualizar
nona mostafa (2025-10-08 09:41:55+00:00): Hi youmadrir123@,
Thank you for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
 I noticed that some recent edits added the tag (oneway=yes) to certain streets.
 However, based on the Vantor satellite imagery (via Vantor Hub, dated 2025-10-06), and (Esri World Imagery)  it is clear that vehicles are moving in both directions on these roads.
Examples:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/249065134
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1314799280
Also, adding road direction tags has resulted in some floating roads (roads not connected properly).
Examples:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1314799279
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/857533207
Could you please review these edits and correct them if necessary?
 Thank you again for your time and effort to improve the map!
Best regards,
nona mostafa
dieterdreist (2025-10-21 07:54:01+00:00): Ciao mmicheli, benvenuto in OpenStreetMap. Ho appena notato che ci sono alcuni problemi con queste modifiche tue. Generalmente non cancelliamo mai le cose che esistono per poi ridisegnarle, invece vanno modificate. Se ti è capitato di fare modifiche non volute, la soluzione più facile è quelle di tornare in dietro (ctrl+z) o in alternativa, non caricare le modifiche sul server. 
Vedo cancellati percorsi che esistevano da 17 anni: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28610947/history/1
https://www.openstreetmap.org/
(campo da golf), poi ridisegnati come edificio (l'intero campo da golf come gigantesco edificio). Non si capisce il commento "4 buche PDM", immagino si riferisca a buche da golf? Sarebbe meglio evitare le abbreviazioni, ed essere più preciso nella descrizione (sono state aggiunte? Modificate? Rimosse? etc.)
Insomma, OSM è complesso ed è normale che si facciano "danni" all'inizio, ma sopratutto le cancellazioni non sono quasi mai necessari.
Saluti e buona mappatura,
Martin
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-07 21:33:00+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13201482901

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-07 21:53:03+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13201482901

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
ilias_ (2025-10-08 08:06:45+00:00): Great job!
citrula (2025-10-08 02:58:14+00:00): Welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contributions!
eggie (2025-10-08 06:01:15+00:00): Dag Stefan. Zo doormappen levert alleen maar gefronste wenkbrauwen op binnen de OSM Community.
Het doet ook verder niets in OSM. Lees de tips svp door en ga dan aan de slag. 
Dit kan beter allemaal weg.
Geef concreet aan wat je doet.. My map edits zegt niemand iets. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-10-08 05:57:21+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback: Het is mogekijk om wegen als vlakken re taggen, maar niet zo.
Je zult dan de weg moeten specificeren. Dat is niet prohibited, maar bv service.
Routeren doet het dan overigens niet en ook is niet alles een wegdeel.
Bv     area:highway=footway
    area:highway=cycleway
    area:highway=path
    area:highway=pedestrian
    area:highway=steps
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:area:highway#How_to_map

Je kunt beter gewoon een weg op een lijnelement taggen. bv highway=service en service=driveway
De toegang kun je bijtaggen met bv access=private

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
NeisBot (2025-10-07 22:06:37+00:00): Hi mmicheli, welcome and thanks for your contribution!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

Based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Added wheelchair accessibility"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-07 22:00:55+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1436290532

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
LordGarySugar (2025-10-16 02:01:42+00:00): Is ALDI really still here? This recent changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172048221 moved the supermarket to a new site to the East, between Rockingham Road and Gores Lane
jay_gray (2025-10-08 01:37:09+00:00): Changeset: 172979915
Sunningdale, Trail BC: digitized building footprints for GIS310 Assignment 5 using Esri World Imagery (#SelkirkCollege #GIS310)
rskedgell (2026-01-13 09:31:44+00:00): In this changeset you added four railway=crossing nodes where a sidewalk crosses railway lines by what is obviously a *bridge*.

This may be the default "upgrade" offered by the Rabid editor, but it is also clearly and obviously wrong.

It also entirely defeats the purported object of adding separate sidewalks if you then add imaginary level crossings over railway lines, as routers are likely to assign a much higher cost to these.

Repaired in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177170440
VLD318 (2026-01-13 18:27:59+00:00): Hello rskedgell,

Thank you for bringing this error to my attention and for removing the incorrect railway=crossing nodes. It appears this error could have been avoided if I had applied the appropriate bridge and layer tags to the newly created sidewalk. Apologies for any inconvenience. 

VLD318
user_5359 (2025-10-08 07:31:44+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/8825643799
(a tree) more than 100 meters. Please check the correct position. If you need help, you are welcome!
streckenkundler (2025-10-08 06:41:12+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct

Wo wurde dieser Massen-Edit angekündigt?
streckenkundler (2025-10-08 06:41:05+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct

Wo wurde dieser Massen-Edit angekündigt?
streckenkundler (2025-10-08 06:40:56+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct

Wo wurde dieser Massen-Edit angekündigt?
streckenkundler (2025-10-08 06:40:48+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct

Wo wurde dieser Massen-Edit angekündigt?
NeisBot (2025-10-07 23:57:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisRevert (2025-10-12 05:12:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173163369
where the changeset comment is: 
Remove unclear map edits
streckenkundler (2025-10-08 06:40:39+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct

Wo wurde dieser Massen-Edit angekündigt?
BlauerRothirsch (2025-10-08 00:49:43+00:00): Names of buildings deleted, as they were not the correct ones but only served as temporary orientation for me. I forgot to remove them before uploading.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-07 20:05:39+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12823859387/history has shop = smoke that was added in this edit
Is it the same as shop=headshop - see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=headshop ? Or the same as https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=smartshop ?

Or maybe it sells e-cigarettes and is shop=e-cigarette ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=e-cigarette )?

Or maybe shop=tobacco is the best fit ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=tobacco )?

Or is it a separate shop category that should be documented as valid?
campbelltree (2025-10-09 20:05:51+00:00): This is a failed upload; reverted in 173066845
flohoff (2025-10-08 19:10:50+00:00): Moin,
hier Feldstraße macht gar keinen Sinn da separate Bürgersteige einzuzeichnen weil es nichtmal einen höhenunterschied gibt. Es ist eine Fläche.

Damit ist mehr kaputt als gewonnen.

Flo
Novelgomez (2025-10-09 02:36:38+00:00): Que crees que haces nisiquiera eres de este pueblo  para estar editando si no sabes no edites
Comino (2025-10-08 07:36:16+00:00): Hi,

In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes".

Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag !
Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead.

For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Merchants#tagging-guidance
and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bitcoin

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
https://btcmap.org/tagger/6794624
GenericUsername4 (2025-10-19 18:54:57+00:00): Good afternoon,

I saw that you used nearmap API as a custom background.

We are not permitted to use them for tracing or any derivative work. Did you somehow get explicit permission from nearmap to use their services for OSM?
ostrograd (2025-10-19 20:22:01+00:00): Hi, access is through the NCTCOG's Spatial Data Cooperative Program.
GenericUsername4 (2025-10-20 18:40:12+00:00): Okay.

I hate to be like this, but did they give us explicit permission to use their imagery?

I’m not sure if you were aware, but we can’t use whatever imagery we want even if we have access to it. It has to comply with OBdL. Most imagery providers do not adhere to the strictness of OBdL.
ostrograd (2025-10-21 00:56:21+00:00): Oh yes I'm very aware, and in fact I had this same question initially. (I've been an OSM contributor for a long time). I asked about it at the meeting we had for this project. What I can tell you is the city we're working with does license Nearmap imagery, through the program I mentioned above. As a lowly volunteer I'm not privy to the actual license agreement, so I can't independently verify that it's compatible with OBdL. But I do think that Nearmap offers such a license (seems like the Lyft mapping team is a prominent user of it). So it didn't seem unreasonable to me that our MPO has a similar agreement. Hope this puts you at ease a bit.
ostrograd (2025-10-22 03:19:04+00:00): Now you've got me curious about this again. I emailed my contact to ask for clarification. (Based on past experience, getting a response could take a while however.) Just to be on the safe side though I will avoid using that imagery in the meantime, till I can get confirmation on this question. Thanks for bringing it up.
GenericUsername4 (2025-10-22 18:36:57+00:00): IIRC Lyft has special permission because it’s under their license. Basically if an employee posts changes it’s open but only for their contributions. The licensing for OSM is very confusing lol
user_5359 (2025-10-08 07:23:29+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on your new relation. What is the mean of the tags
CLASSFP=U1
FUNCSTAT=S
GEOID=3205100
GEOIDFQ=1600000US3205100
LSAD=57
MTFCC=G4210
PCICBSA=N
?
PLACEFP	05100
PLACENS	02407816
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-10-08 15:44:09+00:00): Those are TIGER tags. To be honest, I don't know what those specific ones mean.
Kai Johnson (2026-06-05 15:55:44+00:00): I see you updated the Census boundary for Beatty. The update is welcome, but when you make an update like this next time, you might check to see if there's an existing Census boundary in place first. In this case, relation/170095. If there is, the correct thing to do is to update the existing elements with the new geometry rather than deleting and replacing them. That helps preserve the edit history.

Also, I can see that you did not translate the coordinates from TIGER's NAD83 coordinate system to the WGS84 coordinate system used in OSM. That's important for boundary relations like this where the coordinates can't be verified on the ground -- particularly in places like Beatty which is in one of the most geologically active regions of the US. The earth moves here!

Here's how to perform the coordinate transformation if you plan to import other TIGER data in the future: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_transform_data_from_NAD83_to_WGS84
Kai Johnson (2026-06-05 16:00:11+00:00): Also, FYI, here's where you can find out what all those TIGER fields mean: https://www2.census.gov/geo/pdfs/maps-data/data/tiger/tgrshp2025/TGRSHP2025_TechDoc.pdf
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-06-05 19:20:13+00:00): Thank you very much! I've been updating some boundaries in the Southwest US in JOSM, which warns me about being unable to convert to WGS84. I never knew what this meant and proceeded anyway. But now that this tool exists, I might have to redo these boundaries...
Kai Johnson (2026-06-05 19:40:31+00:00): Good idea! If you're working on boundaries in SoCal, you may bump into some that I updated recently. Keep an eye out for boundaries with recent dates in the source tag on the member ways!
flohoff (2025-10-08 17:44:21+00:00): Moin,
du hast hier angefangen Fußwege separat anzugelegen. 

Das ist eher schwierig.

Denn das problem ist das du JEDE stelle mit einem abgesenken Bürgersteig einzeln mappen müsstest - ansonsten ist das Fußgängerrouting kaputt.

Deshalb hab ich das bisher nur an ganz wenig stellen gemacht - z.b. entlang des West/Nordrings weil da das queren für Fußgänger/Radfahrert eh nicht möglich ist.

Also bevor du hier ganz viel Arbeit rein steckst nur so als Heads up.

Fußwege separat mappen hat massive nachteile.

Besser ist das als sidewalk=left/right zu erfassen am Hauptweg.
stirps (2025-10-08 20:46:44+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis.
Ich hatte erst einmal angefangen, das bei größeren Straßen hinzuzufügen (Carl-Bertelsmann, Feuerbornstraße, Barkeystraße, tatsächlich hat auch am Westring ein wenig was gefehlt).

Das in der Innenstadt hatte ich hauptsächlich gemacht, weil ich mir denke dass da die Details mehr Leuten dienen als woanders.

Bzgl. Queren und Absenkungen: Ich achte eigentlich darauf, dass jegliche Verbindungen zu anderen Wegen erreicht werden und ich zeichne auch alle Übergänge usw. ein. Ist halt schwierig, inwieweit man sich beim routen an die StVO hält und inwieweit man den Leuten empfiehlt einfach über die Straße zu gehen. Ich habe mal den Mittelweg gewählt und auch bei nicht markierten, aber sinnvollen Stellen ebenfalls Verbindungen eingezeichnet. Dadurch sollten keine großen Umwege entstehen.

Generell fand ich es halt ein wenig komisch an wie vielen Stellen Wege einfach aufhören und wie inkonsistent das Ganze ist...
flohoff (2025-10-09 06:36:06+00:00): Die Details machen halt auch dinge kaputt. Gibt da diverse threads zu im Forum ob das sinn macht. 

Das seperate mappen kam mal von leuten die Rollstuhlrouting machen wollten. Das hat sich aber nirgends so richtig durchgesetzt. 

Dadurch das du es separat zeichnest kann man halt nur noch die Straße an ganz explizit von die gemappten stellen queren. Du musst also jede Bordsteinabsenkung einzeln mappen um wieder zu der selben qualität zu kommen, bzw was zu verbessern.

Flo
stirps (2025-10-09 16:36:29+00:00): Frage ist halt ob jeder abgesenkte Bordstein auch eine Querungsmöglichkeit ist, viele davon sind ja auch einfach für Ausfahrten vorhanden. Man kann sich ja auch drüber streiten ob man Leute nicht lieber über offizielle Wege schickt statt so zu routen, dass die Wege irgendwo über die Straße führen. Da wo es möglich und sinnvoll ist zu queren zeichne ich ja wie gesagt Möglichkeiten ein. 

Aber hast Recht, das ganze scheint schon genügend von der community durchgekaut geworden zu sein. 

Außerhalb der Innenstadt würde ich dann nur bei through traffic Straßen (primary, secondary, tertiary), (oder) die ggf. Fahrradwege auf den Bürgersteigen haben diese einzeichnen wenn das ok ist. Die ganzen kleinen residential streets wo noch nichts vorhanden ist würde ich jetzt auch nicht für jede auf beide Seiten einen Bürgersteig nur für Fußgänger zeichnen, ich hatte es halt hauptsächlich interessant für Radfahrer gehalten und dann sidewalks der Vollständigkeit halber eingezeichnet.
Novelgomez (2025-10-09 02:16:40+00:00): No deberías de modificar esta vía principal  en calle es absurdo lo que haces
Novelgomez (2025-10-09 02:19:36+00:00): Si dudas busca en un satélite actualizado el malecón de pedernales  es una avenida en construcción eso tu no puedes ir cambiando  lo que agrego en el mapa de lo contrario modificare todas tus contribución en el mapa para que me respetes
ParmaCanal (2025-10-13 18:02:47+00:00): Hello Novelgomez,

I reclassified https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1241478625 to path since residential and paths are normally for neighborhood roads, which is what these roads appear to be. Based on policy regarding secondaries (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dsecondary), secondary highways are usually used to tag arterial roads that are of lesser relative importance than primary roads, and this section does not appear to be open as an arterial road currently. Upon full official opening, then it would seem to match that classification guideline. I hope that helps to explain what I did here. Have a good day.

Hola Novelgomez,

Reclasiifiqué https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1241478625 como camino, ya que las vías residenciales y los caminos normalmente corresponden a vías vecinales, que es lo que parecen ser estas vías. Según la política sobre vías secundarias (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dsecondary), las vías secundarias suelen usarse para identificar vías arteriales de menor importancia relativa que las vías primarias, y esta sección no parece estar abierta como vía arterial actualmente. Tras su apertura oficial completa, parecería cumplir con esa directriz de clasificación. Espero que esto ayude a explicar mi decisión. Que tenga un buen día.
rudychung (2025-10-08 06:22:30+00:00): Thanks @旧加卷 for your kindly reminder. Would follow your suggestion.
Supaplex (2025-10-08 07:21:40+00:00): hi 旧加卷

感謝你相關建議，應當是要照一個圖徵與一個實體物件的原則，但你有原先的編輯變動留下相關的提醒嗎？
提醒你OpenStreetMap是國際協作計畫，圖資累積過程中的討論也很重點，也需要注意口氣，大家都為了讓圖資品質與數量而努力。
另外客製化的工具也請留意，請留下相關記錄，如osm wiki上面撰寫相關程式或是腳本的敘述

謝謝
旧加卷 (2025-10-08 07:34:59+00:00): @Supaplex
感谢提醒，后续的相关编辑将会注意提醒
NeisBot (2025-10-08 02:48:35+00:00): Hi Grab(TH)_Tanyamai, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 9 landuse(')

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=172983070
GrabTH_Tanyamai (2025-10-24 05:00:30+00:00): Hi, sorry for lately reply.

All of the deletions were intentional because of the duplicates/overlaps of landuse.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-05 14:56:17+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1436325984/history has shop = magic that was added in this edit
shop=magic ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop or https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Tag_descriptions_for_key_%22shop%22 fitting? Maybe new value needs to be invented? Maybe this data is wrong and there is no shop here? Maybe it is not a shop but something else?
matthewsheffield (2026-02-06 12:15:52+00:00): Hello. I guess you didn't follow the link for the interestingly named Soul Crystal XOXO? I think a new shop value would be useful as this shop genuinely sells items to undertake "magic" not the "illusions" or "tricks" that stage magicians perform. For example, oracle & tarot, and ritual tools. How would you describe it?!
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-06 12:27:10+00:00): shop=esoteric
NeisBot (2025-10-08 03:22:35+00:00): Hi Grab(TH)_Tanyamai, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 16 landuse(')

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=172983512