piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
rempshaener (2025-11-07 20:09:33+00:00): Hallo,

ich möchte auf https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines bzw. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct hinweisen.
Du hast Daten importiert, ohne dies im Vorfeld abzustimmen.
Das stellt in der Regel kein Problem dar.
Leider hast du bestehende Hydranten, die detailliertere Daten enthielten, einfach gelöscht. U. a. deshalb sind entsprechende Importe vorher abzustimmen. Deine Löschungen zeigen wenig Respekt gegenüber der Arbeit anderer Mapper.
Zusätzlich hast du in deinem Löschänderungssatz noch eine Straße gelöscht, was eine Teilanpassung erschwert.
Ich habe deine Änderungen rückgängig gemacht.
Gerne unterstütze ich bei Fragen, wie es besser geht. 
Das ganze dürfte ungefähr wie folgt ablaufen:
- Die Daten des Wasserversorgers werden vor Ort überprüft und am besten mit Nennweite, Position etc. angereichert
- Bestehende Daten werden überarbeitet, z. B. wird die Position verfeinert. Löschen ist tabu.
- Das Delta wird hochgeladen.

Viele Grüße
grzegorz75jan (2025-11-08 05:10:10+00:00): Nie stać cię na komentarz, opis powodu wycofania. Tu to nawet wypadało najpierw napisać do edytującego a w przypadku braku odpowiedzi dopiero cofać jednak z komentarzem a nie cichaczem.

Patrząc na podkłady i jak to było wrysowane to też by mnie nosiło ale bez przesady.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174348915
YomanNH (2025-11-08 08:09:51+00:00): I przydałyby się normalne opisy zestawów zmian, a nie jakieś undooooo, czy inny gangsterski slang.
Yog Sot (2025-11-08 16:56:51+00:00): w miejscu owego track są zarośla, a winnym prebiegu to ewentualnie przecinka preciwpożarowa, ale nie w tym przebiegu, wiec nie wiadomo co autor miał na myśli. 
Tak, naturalnie, na pewno Zwiadowca odpowie.
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2025-11-09 03:09:51+00:00): Merhaba. OpenStreetMap'e Google Haritalar'dan veri kopyalamak doğru değil. Eklediğiniz yerlerin adlarındaki yazım yanlışları, büyük/küçük harfler(bazı işletmelerin adını tamamıyla büyük harfle yazarken bazılarını Title Case'e uygun yazmanız-googledakiler ile tıpatıp aynı-), yer adlarında bulunmaması gereken bilgileri(web sitesi, marka adı vb. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13287893673) ad kısmına(google haritalardaki ile tıpatıp aynı şekilde) yazmanız, düğümleri eklediğiniz noktaların Google'daki muhtemel hataları da içerecek şekilde aynen aktarılmış olması gibi birçok husus bazı şeyleri kopyaladığınızı gösteriyor. 

Google Haritalar'ın lisansı, OpenStreetMap'e veri aktarmaya uygun değil, Google veri aktarmaya izin vermiyor. Eğer eklediğiniz yerleri bilmiyorsanız Google'dan herhangi bir şey kesinlikle kopyalanmamalı. Eklediklerinizin arasında, Google'dan kopyalamadığınız, sizin bilginize dayanan yerler varsa lütfen onları yazınız. Onlar dışında eklediklerinizi silmek gerekli.

İyi günler.
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2025-11-09 03:19:00+00:00): Binalar, çatısına göre değil zemindeki konumuna göre çizilmeli. Konu ile ilgili ayrıntılı açıklamayı şuradan okuyabilirsiniz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Roof_modelling

Uydu görüntülerinden anlaşıldığı kadarıyla binalar ile yollar üst üste değil. Bu değişikliğinizde layer=* etiketinin kullanılması gereken bir yer görünmüyor. layer=* etiketinin hangi durumlarda kullanılması gerektiği şurada anlatılmış. Lütfen bkz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer
Glassman (2025-11-08 20:59:03+00:00): It looks like a building that might contain landfill so it should still be tagged as building=
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174349244
atchisson (2025-11-07 20:43:01+00:00): Bonjour,

Vos modifications m'interroge, vous avez supprimé des choses qui semble à priori encore exister.

Je pense au rond point rue des hautes marches, ainsi que les arrêts de bus jean royer et rochebise, mais j'ai pu en rater d'autres

Êtes vous certains de ces modifications ?
Sybertron (2025-11-07 20:51:38+00:00): Bonjour,

Je vous confirme bien que le rond-point rue des hautes marches a été supprimé (c'est maintenant un dos d'âne) pour permettre la déviation de la ligne 15 en vue des travaux de la deuxième ligne de tramway.
L'arrêt rochebise n'existe plus depuis le 25 août.
Pour l'arrêt royer c'est le cas depuis juillet dernier (travaux deuxième ligne de tramway place de la liberté).
atchisson (2025-11-07 21:18:04+00:00): Oh mes excuses, j'avais compris ça comme un démontage de l’abri et non un arrêt de service !

Il y a pas mal de vandalisme en ce moment, et un compte avec peu d'historique supprimant autant de choses m'a rendu un peu parano, je dois l'avouer

Je me suis permis de changer le rond point en "mini giratoire", qui semble coller à votre description : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:highway%3Dmini_roundabout 

Merci pour votre cartographie et votre réactivité
Glassman (2025-11-08 20:40:08+00:00): #TIP: instead of deleting the parking lot then re-adding it, just modify the geometry. That save the history of the object.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174349592
mcliquid (2025-11-12 14:32:43+00:00): Hallo mapperich, vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag mit iD!

Ein kleiner Hinweis für die Zukunft: Änderungen sollten möglichst lokal bleiben.
Dein aktuelles Changeset erstreckt sich von Vorarlberg bis Wien, also über eine sehr große Entfernung – das kann für andere Mapper und Reviewer schwer nachvollziehbar sein.

Um Überprüfbarkeit von Änderungen zu erleichtern, ist es empfehlenswert:
- Änderungen innerhalb eines kleinen geografischen Bereichs (z. B. einer Stadt, eines Bezirks oder einer Region) zusammenzufassen,
- Änderungen innerhalb desselben Landes zu halten,
- und vor dem Wechsel in ein anderes Gebiet die bisherigen Änderungen hochzuladen bzw. zu speichern.

Warum das wichtig ist, wird hier im Wiki erklärt:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Vielen Dank fürs Beachten und weiterhin viel Spaß beim Mappen!
mapperich (2025-11-12 19:06:42+00:00): Hallo mcliquid,
ich muss zugeben, es ist nicht dass erste Mal dass ich das höre. Und es macht auch Sinn. Ich werde in Zukunft wieder mehr darauf achten! Danke für den Hinweis.

LG
L29Ah (2025-11-10 00:01:02+00:00): Is the building demolished too?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174350020
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-08 13:26:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 174376166, 174376209, 174376101, 174376051 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed import of poor quality data - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174352946 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18934 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18933
HellMap (2025-11-09 11:21:14+00:00): Has the 30 sign on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/156344786 really been removed recently? It doesn't seem likely that Jelgava would remove a 30 sign when they are frequently installing more of them.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-08 13:25:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 174376166, 174376209, 174376101, 174376051 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed import of poor quality data - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174352946 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18934 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18933
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-08 13:26:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 174376166, 174376209, 174376101, 174376051 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed import of poor quality data - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174352946 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18934 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18933
little_maper (2025-11-09 10:55:48+00:00): Hello JohnnyDoes;
Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap in Iraq,
I noticed you added the "access=no" tag to some highways
Examples:
way 1324115567
way 1232098919
way 1232098923
way 1232098922
way 1324115582
way 1324115581
way 1324115585
way 1324115586
According to the latest news, these connections have been officially opened.
Here are some references:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JDh6ShmuZNs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FN1XV0LYG8A
Could you please share the source you used when adding these tags?
Regards
little_maper
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-08 13:26:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 174376166, 174376209, 174376101, 174376051 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed import of poor quality data - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174352946 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18934 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18933
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-08 13:26:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 174376166, 174376209, 174376101, 174376051 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed import of poor quality data - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174352946 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18934 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18933
notmyproblem1 (2025-11-09 18:04:48+00:00): Please map the hounse numbers with a NODE/POINT not in the building!! 🙏
t_ja (2025-11-07 22:00:11+00:00): Hello,
what is the meaning of these changes?
Because:
1) such value can be calculated anytime, it is not needed to store it in the OSM database,
2) the source used is  "SRTM" which is very inaccurate, but there is more accurate source, e.g. "DMR 5.0",
3) the tagging is wrong, as the prefix "ele:" is used for storing values in specific datums, e.g. "ele:wgs84". There is no such datum as "source"... I believe, that you wanted to use the "source namespace", i.e. "source:ele", see the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source#Multiple_source_tags_.28historic.29

If you would have followed the rules for imports, and discussed this in advance, we could avoid this mess ☹️
aceman444 (2025-11-08 10:56:12+00:00): Hi, what is the source of this data? Is this just automatically generated from some source like SRTM or DMR5.0? You did not provide any source thus this whole changeset is very dubious even aside the technical problems t_ja mentions.
aceman444 (2025-11-08 11:09:29+00:00): OK, you put the source (SRTM) onto each object (good) but with the wrong tag (as t_ja explains). You did not write any source onto the changeset and also did not reference the description of the import and the community acceptance of this import, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines .
HellMap (2025-11-09 10:53:42+00:00): Hello,

Please be aware that there may be additional speed limit tags, such as `maxspeed:type=sign`. When changing speed limits, these need to be updated or removed. For example, for this section https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/428047347 that was 70, but now 50, the `maxspeed:type=sign` implies there is an actual 50 sign (rather than for example being default urban speed limit `maxspeed:type=LV:urban`). This value is optional, but it is helpful to understand why certain segments are set to certain values.

What is the speed limit here - is it just the default city speed?

Thanks
literan (2025-11-08 11:21:43+00:00): не ошибка, два магазина Около рядом? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13287992319#map=19/55.747244/37.660596
empty_child (2025-11-08 11:37:25+00:00): Разве что за месяц тот, который на востоке, переехал
literan (2025-11-08 11:44:30+00:00): оба ты нанес) а на яндексе в обоих зданиях - Продукты
empty_child (2025-11-08 12:06:26+00:00): У меня, конечно, -6 диоптрий, но айдентику я читаю хорошо :)
empty_child (2025-11-08 12:41:29+00:00): Только что сходил. Действительно, съехал, висит аренда. Уже исправил
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-08 13:25:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 174376166, 174376209, 174376101, 174376051 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed import of poor quality data - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174352946 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18934 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18933
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2025-11-09 03:35:04+00:00): In cities in Turkey, every house(except for illegal structures) must have a house number.  I think the “nohousenumber=yes” tags you added are incorrect. Are you sure these places really don't have house numbers?
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2025-11-09 03:47:21+00:00): Hello. I believe some of the ways you changed aren't suitable for the highway=service tag. After reading the relevant Wiki pages, could you please review your changes again?

See: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dservice
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dresidential

Have a nice day.
notmyproblem1 (2025-11-09 18:03:06+00:00): ho modificato il tag da ufficio per "insegnare" a doposcuola con il tag "amenity=kindergarten
education=kindergarten", perfavore prossima volta mappare bene =D
pyrog (2025-11-08 06:18:17+00:00): Bonjour,
"Petits" ajustements mais casse de l'itinéraire de randonnée ;)
https://knooppuntnet.nl/fr/analysis/route/15512987/map?layers=background,hiking,nodes,forward-route,backward-route,unused&position=45.91349688,6.23571412,20

C'est visible aussi dans WMT en cliquant sur l'onglet analyse de l'itinéraire :
https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=15512987&type=relation&map=18.0/45.9135/6.2358

Pour info, il existe depuis peu la couche IGN LIDAR-HD MNT ELEVATION qui permet souvent de voir les chemins sous les arbres (voir même les sentiers).
Et depuis quelques semaines, la couche ORTHO Express IGN 2025 qui montre les dernières constructions.

Ces 2 couches (et éventuellement des orthophotos plus anciennes) ainsi que les cartes de chaleur Strava permettent de tracer plus précisément les chemins en montagne.
Bien plus précisément qu'une trace GPS unique.

Cordialement,
Yves
pyrog (2025-11-08 07:33:26+00:00): J'ai fait les corrections mais nous avons édité la zone en même temps.

Yves — Groupe OSM Plein Air
SomeoneElse (2025-11-08 00:52:36+00:00): Thanks!
Glassman (2025-11-08 21:04:22+00:00): Please add a more descriptive changeset comment
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174352124
Erelen (2025-11-08 00:14:31+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1448294609

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tunnel%3Dbuilding_passage

"The layer should be the same as the layer of the building <...> So if the building doesn't have a layer tag, the way should not have one either."
SomeoneElse (2025-11-07 21:31:39+00:00): Also 05/11, Huntington, ts2365b
LordGarySugar (2025-11-24 04:50:49+00:00): I've re-added amenity=parking to these courtyards as the spaces are visible on aerial imagery - unless you have a source showing that they have been removed/repurposed?
Glassman (2025-11-08 21:05:31+00:00): Whyu did you remove the add and buildding tag?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174352602
Glassman (2025-11-08 21:06:02+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174352602
Glassman (2025-11-08 21:07:30+00:00): I reverted this edit
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174352602
LordGarySugar (2025-11-09 16:16:49+00:00): For what reason have you deleted all these internal walkways and corridors?
LordGarySugar (2025-11-24 04:51:21+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175050655 as I didn't recieve a response.
JonnyW03 (2025-11-27 13:37:51+00:00): Apologies, this was done by mistake. Thank you very much for correcting.
LordGarySugar (2025-11-27 16:01:00+00:00): I do not understand - how can you delete 120 footways and corridors by mistake?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-01 18:28:18+00:00): A jakie jest aktualnie? Nazwy historyczne to w OpenHistoricalMap powinny być
muralito (2025-11-07 23:36:44+00:00): Hi. I have doubts about the accuracy of several values in Buenos Aires. No way they are 30 or more meters above the sea near the river. And also the precision, no way you can express these SRTM values ".0" or any other decimal point. STRM data just lacks that precision.
felipeeugenio (2025-11-08 00:01:26+00:00): Hello.
1.	Besides what was stated before by Muralito, two other things:
1) Contact the community to gauge interest in importing the data. You must follow the import guidelines before doing this type of import (Import/Guidelines - OpenStreetMap Wiki). That assumes this information follows the OpenStreetMap licensing.
2.	"OSM currently records points with their latitude and longitude. Elevations are only recorded for features where they are significant, such as peaks or surveyed points. Where this is done, the elevation above geoid (EGM96) is stored in the ele=* key. OpenStreetMap does not try to be a general elevation database, so do not tag elevation of nodes with no other tags, as well as for objects whose elevation is not an information of general interest." (Key:ele - OpenStreetMap Wiki).


I understand mountains and hills and some features like famous hotels and lakes, and towns in which the elevation is relevant, but 1XX nodes in Buenos Aires are pointless.
regards
aceman444 (2025-11-08 11:00:03+00:00): It seems this user is automatically generating all these elevations from some height data, without any mention of the process (import description) and even tagging problems. He does it across the world. This must be stopped and reverted.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-08 13:25:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 174376166, 174376209, 174376101, 174376051 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed import of poor quality data - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174352946 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18934 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18933
Glassman (2025-11-08 21:08:45+00:00): The area tag is unnecessary. building= makes it an polygon
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174353248
user_5359 (2025-11-08 08:13:23+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/10302326602 more than 100 meters over streets and buildings. 
I moved the node back to the original position.
limes11 (2025-11-08 02:34:43+00:00): Hallo,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1448302040 

ergibt so keinen Sinn. Wenn, dann muss die Zufahrt von der Straße abgehen. Generell würde ich aber so etwas überhaupt nicht einzeichnen. Es ist klar, dass es zu jeder Garage eine solche Zufahrt geben muss.

Viele Grüße
NorthCrab_upload (2025-11-07 22:11:05+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13288110934

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
salma_ayman (2025-11-09 09:35:58+00:00): Hello Abdullah Al Werfalli,
Thank you for your contributions to OpenStreetMap.
Regarding your edits here:
 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174353822#map=16/31.14878/16.58161&layers=N
I noticed that you changed the classification from trunk_link to primary_link. However, this change doesn’t seem to align with the current route network and the OSM Wiki guidelines for road classification:
 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway#:~:text=lined%20with%20housing.-,Link%20roads,-highway
According to these guidelines, link roads should be tagged with the _link classification of the highest-classified road they connect to.
Could you please review these edits and adjust them accordingly?
Thank you again for your collaboration and valuable contributions!
Kind regards,
salma_ayman
NeisBot (2025-11-07 22:33:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisBot (2025-11-07 22:33:42+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Puppy adoption nursery in Grandville MI"
NeisReview (2025-11-08 21:36:42+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/174395459
Glassman (2025-11-08 21:00:24+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

The old way looks like a service road for the parking lot. Please add it back
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174354433
NeisBot (2025-11-07 22:46:34+00:00): Hi tomwrath, welcome to the OSM projekt and thanks for your contribution!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish
NeisBot (2025-11-07 22:46:34+00:00): Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added houses, places of worship, police station, and address details on Owl Eyes Road and other streets"
eggie (2025-11-08 06:46:17+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback   Er is al een adresnode 53 . Daar heb ik de info mee samengevoegd, 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Orblivion (2025-11-07 23:12:42+00:00): I will note that as of now their website has a page for the cafe, but I spoke to an employee who said it was supposed to be removed. Hopefully they will soon.
tomhukins (2025-12-03 18:11:17+00:00): Thank you very much for making this helpful improvement to the map.

I suspect "addr:housename" would make more sense than "name" for a house's name: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:housename

What do you think?

Again, thank you for adding useful information to the map.
Peter N Brooks (2025-12-03 23:55:10+00:00): Hi Tom. Im new to this. How do I update using the "addr:housename"?
tomhukins (2025-12-04 12:53:49+00:00): It looks like you used the iD editor, which shows the house name alongside the other address fields you added.

Let me know if you have any more questions or if you would like me to change this for you.

Thanks again for your helpful work.
tomhukins (2025-12-08 18:36:58+00:00): I have switched the "name" to "addr:housename" in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/292296184 and fixed a couple of mistakes moving a residential street and a railway line.

Please let me know if you see anything wrong with my change.
Peter N Brooks (2025-12-08 22:43:17+00:00): Thanks Tom. That’s great. I’ve added a note where the railway is incorrect. Also there is a path that links Fanny Shaws Park to the Cemetery and to Spring close. I’ll have a go at adding it but would be grateful if you check my amends. Thanks