piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2026-01-28 06:56:49+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13469038977 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Boutique store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-05 06:18:44+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178123005
(Cleaned up leftovers from previous edits)
NeisBot (2026-01-28 06:56:50+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/70461525 v6

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Auto repair shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-05 06:18:44+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178123006
(No visible changes after review)
MassCartog (2026-01-27 16:28:20+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM. The feature you removed in this changeset is valid. Please don’t remove valid OSM data.

You have a new account and might not be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground. If it exists on the ground, it is valid data regardless of a feature being public or private, designated or informal/illegal/unauthorized. Removing features that exist is actually considered vandalism.

It's clear that these features still exist on the ground. Not being public access areas is an invalid reason to remove data from OSM. So this edit is incorrect and damaging to valid OSM data.

The correct way to handle this is to use OSM's tagging system. access=private, or access=no would be appropriate if they are closed to the public. Once this is done, services that do use OSM data will reflect that and specify their access.

Please read this for more info:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won't_delete_roads_on_private_property

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F
SenorT (2026-01-27 16:56:57+00:00): Sorry about that! Looks like you fixed a lot of my mistakes that I made this morning.  I read over the details and will be sure to adjust it correctly in the future.  Once again, sorry for deleting those roads.
MassCartog (2026-01-27 18:57:00+00:00): No problem, Happy mapping!
MassCartog (2026-01-27 16:32:20+00:00): Hello again, roads on Private Property is not a valid reason to remove data from OSM. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won't_delete_roads_on_private_property
SenorT (2026-01-27 17:01:21+00:00): Sorry. Thanks for fixing my error.
MassCartog (2026-01-27 18:56:29+00:00): No problem, thanks for the reply. Happy mapping!
NeisBot (2026-01-28 06:56:52+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13469123537 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Sign shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-05 06:18:45+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178123007
(No visible changes after review)
NeisBot (2026-01-28 06:56:53+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13469210260 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Hair salon"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-05 06:18:45+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178123008
(No visible changes after review)
Fraxi (2026-01-27 16:02:51+00:00): Погледнах и снимките на Esri(+Clarity) и Mapbox за проверка за изтритата сграда. Не знам защо не се е отбелязало.
Taya_S (2026-01-27 16:30:25+00:00): Reverted sockpuppet vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177770468
NeisBot (2026-01-28 06:54:44+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 15 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1102596989 v4 | 6 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1063289485 v6 | 5 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/624881921 v8

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177769360
Aethonatic (2026-01-29 12:34:24+00:00): Please be more careful as to not drag nodes out from their original positions. This seems to be a common pattern among your changesets.
fb552 (2026-01-27 16:04:27+00:00): Ciao Bibo, con changeset/177769373 i binari aggiunti sono stati rimossi da OSM.
Come discusso negli ultimi mesi questi binari non esistono più e non restano neppure le tracce della loro passata presenza.
Consiglio, se di interesse, un import su OHM.
Taya_S (2026-01-27 16:30:26+00:00): Reverted sockpuppet vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177770468
NeisBot (2026-01-27 16:06:13+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your changesets and noticed that the cumulative count of your recent edits (4 changesets) shows that 317 of your last 319 changes were deletions. This is quite an unusual proportion, so I wanted to check with you.

Could you please confirm whether these deletions were intentional or if they may have occurred by mistake?

#DeletionsCheck #Cumulative
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?uid=23758652
t_ja (2026-01-27 21:26:49+00:00): Vdaka za opravu 👍
NeisBot (2026-01-28 06:56:54+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/836834191 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Italian restaurant"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-05 06:18:45+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178123009
(No visible changes after review)
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-27 11:10:01+00:00): Cleaned up SEO spam and other mistagging for Lucid Private Offices POI in changeset 184687929

https://osm.org/changeset/184687929
infeeeee (2026-01-27 19:21:30+00:00): Szia! Üdv az OpenStreetMapen!

Albertfalva már szerepelt pontként: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/269800669 és relációként is: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2700782

Módosításcsomagod visszavonva: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177776977

Ha kérdésed merülne fel, a magyar szerkesztő közösség elérhetőségeit megtalálod ezen az oldalon: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hungary/Közösség#Elérhetőségek

További jó térképezést!
NeisBot (2026-01-28 06:54:48+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 13 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/137862323 v19 | 13 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177770181
pitscheplatsch (2026-01-28 07:44:08+00:00): In this case, it seems the reported issues are false positives. The geometries were not changed in a way that would introduce crossings, and the tagging adjustments did not create any new conflicts.

Sorry for the inconvenience, and thanks again for your map edits.

Regards,
Pascal
eggie (2026-01-27 16:51:15+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback    Je wijzigingen kunnen niet kloppen. Er is hier al getagd maxspeed:backward	80	
maxspeed:forward	50	

Dat staat er nog steeds. Dus een algemene max snelhied van 80 is dan niet correct.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-01-27 16:53:07+00:00): reverted by changeset #177771300
osmviborg (2026-01-27 16:41:45+00:00): Hej, undlad venligst at rette i adressepunkterne. Adresserne bliver importeret fra Danmarks Adresser og skal kun indeholde de importerede data.
NeisBot (2026-01-28 06:56:55+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13504385963 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Chiropractic clinic"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-05 06:18:46+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178123010
(No visible changes after review)
liums (2026-01-27 16:41:04+00:00): batch 1*

See part 2 here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import_des_arr%C3%AAts_des_cars_R%C3%A9gion_Auvergne_Rhone-Alpes_depuis_les_donn%C3%A9es_du_SMMAG
NeisBot (2026-01-28 06:56:57+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/1284747249 v4

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Florist shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-05 06:18:46+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178123011
(No visible changes after review)
NeisBot (2026-01-28 06:56:58+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13353800213 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Mexican restaurant"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-05 06:18:46+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178123012
(No visible changes after review)
no details provided here (2026-01-28 08:31:30+00:00): Yes, it shut (from memory) at the start of November last year.  Thanks for the prompt and I will delete the tag. I only mapped that end of Leigh in September/October: half the town was missing!
NeisBot (2026-01-28 06:56:59+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13364230016 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Cabinet store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-05 06:18:47+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178123013
(No visible changes after review)
Glassman (2026-01-27 22:57:10+00:00): The apparent owner of the removed building wrote to us at the DWG. We are trying to understand why it was removed. Can you help us understand, because there is a strong sentiment to add it back?
Andyp4777 (2026-01-27 21:54:28+00:00): Yes the entire building is now Lidl. I think it was open last time I saw.
arjunaraoc (2026-02-22 00:19:25+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). No park on a node geometry, park already exists
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177772279
NeisBot (2026-01-28 06:57:00+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13501680312 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Insurance agency"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-05 06:18:47+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178123014
(No visible changes after review)
TrickyFoxy (2026-01-28 08:51:14+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177795030
真中あお (2026-01-27 17:38:20+00:00): 文昌两个岛的始末可参见：https://www.zhihu.com/question/56763164/answer/3048840875
aighes (2026-01-27 23:05:37+00:00): Hey Hyposometic, please stop with your deletion and simplification of OSM data. In several changesets you replaced detailed turning cycles with simplified notes. That's not appreciated. I will revert those changesets.
Hypsometric (2026-01-28 00:25:32+00:00): Sorry. Many turning islands were pretty messy. There were a few one offs that did not match the others. Be careful with reverting. There may be other edits in the mix. Are you cleaning up the messy ones here?
aighes (2026-01-28 01:39:29+00:00): Not sure what you mean by messy. They were matching to the latest HiRes aerials from Oakland County. If you spot something odd and are not interested in fixing it with the same level of detail, feel free to add notes.

For sure, I just reverted those changes to the road geometry. The rest of your clean up in the area looked good to me, so I didn't touch them.
Hypsometric (2026-01-28 12:50:41+00:00): It may not have been this changeset but most that I found today looked auto generated.
Hypsometric (2026-01-28 12:54:21+00:00): By the way, Its been a while since I read the wiki on  turning loops. I should have done that before doing those edits. Sorry for the trouble.
Frank Peng (2026-01-27 19:02:43+00:00): Thanks!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177773219
TrickyFoxy (2026-01-28 08:50:01+00:00): Прочитайте https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Highway_classification

Вы неправильно изменили статусы дорог. Статус дорог между населёнными пунктами не опредялется состоянием покрытием или почистили ли на нём снег. Для этого есть другие теги.

Откат
StreetSurveyor (2026-02-28 17:30:10+00:00): Referencing ‘Town Line’: There is no evidence this is an officially named road. The sign marks the town boundary, not a street name. Please avoid adding or inventing names that are not supported by survey or authoritative data.
sanjanasharma_lyft (2026-04-10 14:13:59+00:00): Hi StreetSurveyor,
My name is Sanjana, and I'm a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. Thank you so much for paying attention & fixing my mistake.Thanks for the clarification — that makes complete sense. I agree that “Town Line” should be interpreted as a boundary marker rather than a formal road name.
Please accept my apologies. I’ll be more attentive when pushing changesets up.


Thank you for your contribution to OSM!


Regards,
Sanjana
Runik3n (2026-02-05 19:02:16+00:00): Hocam bu nasıl changeset başlığı 😂
Alfred Benimaru Oekaki (2026-04-30 13:34:22+00:00): bir daha hatırlat da böyle changeset başlıkları atmayayım, 3 ay sonra bakınca aşırı cringe duruyo lol
DressyPear4 (2026-02-07 03:41:15+00:00): Olá, antes de adicionar uma grande quantidade de dados no mapa atente-se se estão corretos.
A tag "entrance=yes" deve ser usada para locais fechados, cruzamento de vias com cercas a preferencia é "barrier=gate".
Outra "addr:housenumber=SN" deve ser trocado por "nohousenumber=yes".
Calçadas separadas devem ser adicionadas apenas se existirem e essas devem ter uma conexão com as residenciais, caso contrário nenhum app fará roteamento por elas.
Tire suas dúvidas e discuta com grupos locais, melhor evitar reversão de dados e perder todo trabalho.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177773848
DressyPear4 (2026-02-07 03:56:49+00:00): Lembre-se que é melhor  o mapa não ter dados do que dados incorreto
https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/pt/map/#loc=13/-7.26329/-37.32788&item=xxxx&level=1%2C2%2C3
kapazao (2026-02-03 07:41:30+00:00): Please, do not add duplicates of fuel stations.
There was a fuel station here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1266038258.
Regards
Sizzl (2026-02-03 11:31:08+00:00): Hello kapazao, 
I decided to add the map point because there are two separate gas stations on the premises that have different prices but are owned by the same company (Galp) and are  separated.
kapazao (2026-02-04 13:21:15+00:00): Then the area should be divided for each gas station so they are not overlapped.
I will fix it like you say.
Thank you for your answer.
Regards
aTarom (2026-01-27 20:03:46+00:00): Hola, lo de (Pelagatos) en
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13504811801/history
es un nombre coloquial como se le conoce en la zona al comercio?
Nekoatthegates (2026-01-28 23:54:48+00:00): Correction: Source used was Esri World Imagery (-3.00; 7.00); Strava.
ftrebien (2026-07-22 02:25:54+00:00): Qual é a fonte desses "residenciais" mapeados no meio de lavouras e matos?
Raquel Dezidério Souto (2026-07-25 18:38:14+00:00): Ressalto que o usuário ainda mapeou vários residenciais com mesmo nome e sem indicar fonte.
Raquel Dezidério Souto (2026-07-25 18:39:55+00:00): place=quarter também está utilizada incorretamente para mapear condomínio.
NeisBot (2026-01-28 06:57:03+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/946478969 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Auto detailing studio"
---
Na przykład, bardziej neutralna i obiektywna wersja Twojego tekstu mogłaby brzmieć: "Studio detalingu samochodów"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-05 06:18:47+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178123015
(No visible changes after review)
NeisBot (2026-01-28 06:55:10+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 11 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/563374758 v2 | 4 crossings
https://osm.org/way/565105384 v1 | 3 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/5443335937 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177775340
NeisReview (2026-02-05 06:18:49+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/177799098
joost schouppe (2026-01-27 19:09:20+00:00): You mapped it as a building, not an amenity - that is the more important tag forndata users. I added it.
Probelnijs (2026-01-28 06:47:19+00:00): Thank you; I thought by selecting hospital through the iD editor it would add the full scheme but it looks like this is not the case for hospitals since they often cover more than 1 building :)
silversurfer83 (2026-01-27 20:56:39+00:00): Moin :)

was hast du denn mit hazmat=* hier vor? Der tag ist eigentlich schon sauber dokumentiert für den Verkehr...

Grüße
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177776135
GenGap (2026-01-27 21:44:02+00:00): Gude, Wollte schauen, ob es bei der open fire map auftaucht damit. Hab mich dann wohl verlesen, ich machs wieder rückgängig :-)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177776135
NeisBot (2026-01-28 06:57:05+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13504695412 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Massage therapy center"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-05 06:18:48+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178123016
(No visible changes after review)