piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
highflyer74 (2024-06-13 11:42:49+00:00): Hallo!

Danke für Deinen Beitrag! Bitte beachte, dass Namen in OSM nur für Objekte vergeben werden, die auch wirklich einen Namen haben. Beispielsweise hat eine Bank nicht den Namen "Sitzbank". Dass es sich um eine Bank handelt, ist bereit durch das entsprechende Attribut (in OSM Tag genannt) klar.

Danke, dass Du bei weiteren Bearbeitungen daran denkst :-)

Viele Grüße!
Bloodmage (2023-09-23 17:55:26+00:00): Mass vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141655666
willkmis (2023-09-24 00:48:08+00:00): Hi,
Welcome to OSM! Thanks for trying to fix these lanes up. How to tag lanes correctly can be pretty tricky for newcomers. A couple of notes for you:
-The "forward" and "backward" values are always defined relative to the road's "direction". This direction is arbitrary, but in this particular case Slauson is defined as forward going eastward. It looks like your tagging switches back and forth.
-You always want to define a total lanes=* value, where the value is the sum of the lanes:forward and lanes:backward values
-While technically correct, you don't really need to define turn:lanes if the lanes are all going forward and there are no turn markings.
Hope that helps! If you need more information, the wiki has some helpful examples of lanes tagging: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lanes.

Out of curiosity, what system are you working on where the bug was reported?

Best,
Will
ryandegrunt (2025-06-13 21:56:52+00:00): Placer fork trail has either completely disappeared and was reclaimrd by nature, never existed, or is completely different than as mapped. Verified this by hiking to it, trying to find it for 15 to 30 minutes using GPS and criss crossing the track as marked. This trail needs to be deleted unless somebody can actually prove that exists and not completely gone to nature. I would market for deletion but I cannot figure out or see an option to do it here.
Hikerandy (2025-06-14 02:24:12+00:00): Which part did you try to find? The uppermost part (above the tree line) that connects to Lobo Peak Trail is indeed marked as "pathless" and gives hikers, backpackers, equestrians only guidance how to best connect between the visible part of Placer Fork Trail and Lobo Peak Trail. And to my knowledge, the Forest Service hasn't abandoned this trail - all it would take is to put up a few cairns to mark the way.
ryandegrunt (2025-06-14 03:03:16+00:00): I can definitely vouch that the south end of this "trail" Is non-existent, no cairns, no sign, and definitely as mapped it's not there as I've already explained. The North end may exist but as I walked past it, it looked very doubtful but I did not investigate it like I did the south end. I actually probably spent more like a 1/2 hour towards and hour trying to find it. I didn't want to do the loop because I was trying to save elevation and time but I ended up looping willow and placer because this trail is so gone, unless once again, it's mapped wrong. As you may know, Willow and placer are in bad enough shape with tons of down trees, a beaver crossing bridge, and many stream crossings, in addition to a faint trail. anyways I'm not going to spend any more time trying to correct a trail that shouldn't be here. Up to whoever manages this I guess or me figuring out how to do it.
Hikerandy (2025-06-14 15:41:25+00:00): Maybe I misunderstood you the first time: Placer Fork Tr. No. 72 runs predominantly East-West, Willow Fork Tr. No. 104 Northwest-Southeast, and only Placer Fork Shortcut Tr. No. 191 goes North-South. The Shortcut Tr. No. 191 indeed wasn't there on either end 2 years ago when I searched for it. If that's the one you're talking about (please let me know) I can mark it as nonexistent so it won't show up on the map anymore. Thanks.
ryandegrunt (2025-06-15 12:01:55+00:00): Yes, I am referring to Placer Fork Shortcut Tr. No. 191, as noted by both place markers I inserted and discussed about.
ryandegrunt (2025-06-15 12:07:15+00:00): Also, not sure what you mean by the upper (East) ends of Willow or placer forks marked as "pathless". I see no such designation. A more accurate designation for these trails would be "unmaintained" and then as "pathless" on the last mile or two, but I don't have the exact point where they become pathless. That would need field observation or similar.
ryandegrunt (2025-06-15 12:15:09+00:00): Sorry, that was my fault indeed. I said placer fork trail instead of Placer Fork Shortcut Tr. No. 191. Ugh, don't see a way to edit comments.
Hikerandy (2025-06-15 17:50:02+00:00): For the "pathless" marking, one needs to go into the iD editor, click on the object of interest and in "Edit feature" look at the box "Trail Visibility", where one option is "No: pathless, excellent orientation skills required". - With respect to the exact point where the trail becomes pathless I chose it where no more thread or markers are visible to me. You can go to Map Layers and enable "Map Data" and then click of the trail section of interest to see where the trail attributes change. Or, also in Map Layers, you can choose the somewhat new Tracetrack Topo View where trails are coded by color and appearance, showing their visibility, hiking difficulty rating and more.
clay_c (2023-09-23 16:07:37+00:00): These are not toll roads. Reverted here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141651612
Udarian (2023-09-25 04:57:22+00:00):  I could be wrong here, but my understanding was always that Turnpike is tolled, (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9043777664 and others), so then why did you set it to toll=no. if I'm wrong obviously please correct me, I just want to ensure that everything stays as accurate as possible.
clay_c (2023-09-25 12:22:14+00:00): It appears that there is no toll collection between exits 11 and 13 on the HEFT, and that you can traverse this segment without paying. Other parts of the HEFT, where you must pass through a toll gantry at some point, remain unchanged.
opendcc (2023-09-23 16:42:03+00:00): Hallo,

siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway=cycleway?uselang=de :
Gemischte Rad- und Fußwege sollten mit highway=path und entsprechenden access=*-Tags (typischerweise also bicycle=designated und foot=designated, ergänzt durch segregated=*) eingetragen werden.
Lois (2023-09-24 15:44:41+00:00): Hallo,
ich habe den Weg wieder geändert, weil du Recht hast.
Ich habe den Weg auf cycleway geändert, weil er in osmand, je nach Kartenstil, entweder überhaupt nicht zu sehen war, oder nur bei starkem hineinzoomen aufgetaucht ist.
Vielleicht mache ich auch was falsch?
opendcc (2023-09-24 15:49:47+00:00): Das liegt vermutlich am geringen seitlichen Abstand - die Staatstraße überdeckt den dann fallweise. Da Mapping ist aber korrekt, auch die Lage ist genau auf DOP80 ausgerichtet.
jacobwhall (2023-09-23 16:49:57+00:00): For more info please see note #3899653

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3899653
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-09-30 14:22:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 141952097 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting a series of name-change edits.  Please discuss with the community at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/edit-warring-over-nagorno-karabakh-region-republic/57413/14
Derick Rethans (2024-01-12 11:18:21+00:00): I think this must be open again now?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-northamptonshire-67686661
Mat_B (2024-01-12 21:49:22+00:00): Yes. Updated.
SimonPoole (2025-07-17 03:58:30+00:00): Hi, just a note on this old changeset: you changed the boundary type to administrative here, but that is naturally wrong, at most it is a boundary=statistical.
Giogio83 (2025-07-19 09:51:23+00:00): Hi ok thanks
I saw that you have already fixed it.
Best regards
ablevi202 (2024-02-11 00:09:32+00:00): Hey, hope you're having a good day, why did you delete the driveways 1210204974 and 756845436 in this changeset?
silversurfer83 (2023-09-23 19:28:00+00:00): Hi :)

du hast darum gebeten, dass sich jemand deine Änderung ansieht.
Ist in Ordnung, wenn du die Wohngebietsfläche so exakt erfassen möchtest :)
Ich würde nur gucken, dass ich landuse und Gebäude nicht miteinander verklebe (Marienfelder Str. 50, zB). Sonst passt das schon.

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141654666
flohoff (2023-09-29 12:29:45+00:00): Ich habe das behoben.
silversurfer83 (2023-09-29 13:08:17+00:00): Besten Dank
yzal (2023-09-25 14:05:54+00:00): Dobrý deň, pri pomenovávaní objektov sa do značky "name" dáva oficiálny názov a nepoužívajú všeobecné názvy napr. bankomat, potraviny, kostol... Tie sa zadávajú samostatne ako amenity=atm, shop=convenience, amenity=place_of_worship... Preto bankomat VUB banky má mať v názve len "VUB" a nie "bankomat VUB. Viac info  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:N%C3%A1zvy
luisforte (2023-09-23 18:20:04+00:00): As suas edições não fazem muito sentido, aparentemente danosas: 
--para a classificação das localidades existem regras acordadas (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Portugal/Propostas/Localidades_e_limites_administrativos)
-- Eliminar a data referente ao valor da população invalida o valor da população
-- Eliminar o nome de localidades em outras línguas (name:*) é claramente apagar informação válida.
user_20308673 (2023-09-24 07:41:10+00:00): I changed these places from city to town for the sake of consistency between countries.
Just look at Spain, France, or Italy; these countries have much than 150+ cities, despite being triple the size of Portugal (ref. http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1AX5).
A place like Praia da Vitoria would never be considered a city in these countries.
As for the other two issues, I had reasons for deleting these tags but I don't care very much; if you want I can restore these tags with no problem.
Let me know what you think.
user_20308673 (2023-09-24 07:41:29+00:00): have much less than*
luisforte (2023-09-24 08:57:02+00:00): Local OSM communities define specifics in the rules that apply locally. This is what happens when defining the place tag, according to the page I shared with you.
Even so, you will not read on the official wiki page that a city follows size criteria or equivalences between countries but rather a hierarchy of importance of locations in a country (take a look at the definitions of city and town for example).
It doesn't make any sense for one of us to want to make what seems wise prevail versus the official and local rules.
As for international names, I don't see any reason to delete them unless they are not correct, although in that case it should be corrected and not deleted if we know the correct name. This name usually consists of a phonetic translation of the original name and this helps foreigners to identify a location on the map. It is fully accepted and used everywhere in the world.
As for the auxiliary date for the population tag, in the case of Portugal, the population of a location is defined according to the last census carried out. We have places with dates updated with the last census, others with the previous census. When deleting "population:date" how do I know if that population value is up to date?
I can't see reasons that could support your changes. I suggest you revert these changeset, it is the wisest course of action. It's likely that if you don't do it, someone, not necessarily me, will reverse it.
silversurfer83 (2023-09-23 19:24:17+00:00): Hi :)

Die Wendekreise sehen auf dem Luftbild aber sehr eng aus. Meinst du nicht, dass das einfach Sackgassen sind?

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141655464
fititnt (2023-12-20 20:27:36+00:00): Olá Caio. Seja bem vindo ao OpenStreetMap.

Pergunta: nesse changeset, você deletou alguns elementos com source=pmsp e redimencionou o way/620495236 com height=2.73 (significa: altura da edificação = 2,72 metros) para ocupar o espaço também dos deletados. Você conhece o local pessoalmente para fazer esse tipo de edição? E, se sim, sabe tem certeza que a altura seria essa?

Outra pergunta que eu vou lhe fazer é a seguinte: deram alguma instrução para você de o que fazer com os atributos (como altura) sobre os prédios dessa região com altíssima quantidade de dados prévios?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141655532
yzal (2023-09-25 13:52:23+00:00): Dobrý deň, pri zápise otváracích hodín sa rozdielne intervaly oddeľujú bodkočiarkou ; Čiarka sa používa ako rozšírenie intervalu.
Príklad: prevádzka má otvorené pondelok až piatok od 9-12 a 15-18 sa zapisuje ako Mo-Fr 09:00-12:00,15:00-18:00 (teda s čiarkou medzi časovými intervalmi, lebo prvý interval 9-12 rozširujem o 15-18)
Ak má ale prevádza otvorené pondelok až piatok 8-16 a sobotu 8-12 zapisuje sa to Mo-Fr 08:00-16:00; Sa 08:00-12:00 (teda s bodkočiarkou  medzi časovými intervalmi). Tiež si dajte pozor a sobotu nezapisujte ako So ale ako anglickú skratku Sa. Viac info tu https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours
user_5359 (2023-09-25 12:50:07+00:00): Hello!Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1210339590 (one of nine objects). What is the mean of the key mtb:desciption:fi? Did you mean mtb:description:fi?
NerBert (2023-09-25 13:13:57+00:00): Yes. That’s typo. Now corrected, thanks for the info!
Taya_S (2023-09-24 06:25:05+00:00): Top werk! Bedankt
Geim (2023-09-24 08:28:13+00:00): Graag gedaan. 
Als ik maar een tracklog, of afbeelding van een route heb, dan is het een fluitje van een cent.
silversurfer83 (2023-09-23 19:20:34+00:00): Moin :)

wegen mir kannst du Projekte, die mit an Sicherheit grenzender Wahrscheinlichkeit gebaut werden gerne eintragen.
Zwei Dinge:
a) ist die Quelle für uns legal?
b) Du hast die virtuelle Straße an zwei Punkten mit einem realen Acker verbunden. Da könntest du in Zukunft vielleicht ein kleines bisschen drauf achten, dass das nicht passiert :)

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141656472
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2023-10-06 11:51:10+00:00): Hvad er kilden til de 60 km/h?

Man kan se byzoneskiltet på SFDI forår.
Bo Bank Olesen (2023-10-06 11:59:43+00:00): Der stod 80 km i timen før by skiltet kommer lidt længer inde.
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2023-10-06 22:50:57+00:00): Men hvor kommer de 60 km/h fra?

Er der kommet nye skilt siden Mapillary billederne fra 2018?
Bo Bank Olesen (2023-10-07 05:57:35+00:00): Rettet
YomanNH (2023-09-25 08:37:26+00:00): Cześć,
ciągi pieszo-rowerowe to highway=path. Jest to opisane tu: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Rowery Poprawiłem ciągi pieszo-rowerowe, które zmieniłeś.
TranslatorPS (2023-09-25 08:43:54+00:00): Mea culpa, powinienem był sprawdzić faktycznie, na przyszłość będę wiedział (na logikę dziwnie to wyglądało, no ale, nauczka żeby sprawdzać standardy). Dzięki!
TCduder (2023-09-23 18:31:00+00:00): I mean south/west
Anonix35 (2023-09-26 07:55:52+00:00): Since when has the trail been closed to bicycles ?
If this is the case, the route should now go towards the Plans Frara gondola
ChillyDL (2023-09-26 19:06:49+00:00): Hello Anonix,
I would not know since when the Wasserfallweg has been closed to bicycles. The about a dozen signes though seem pretty new, having no algae or moss or something on them. The track itself looks as if it might have been refurbished only lately, possibly this year.
I am no longer in the area, so I cannot check on the ground where the routes might be now.
ChillyDL (2023-09-26 19:20:18+00:00): The signes refer to the "Legge prov.le n. 10 - 8/5/1990"
Anonix35 (2023-09-27 07:11:29+00:00): I found on Dolomiti Superski.
The Selleronda goes via the gondola Plans-Frara directly in fact.
And in the downhill direction, take the mountain bike path designed for.
Despite the signs, there are a lot of mountain bikes going this way...
SafetyIng (2023-10-01 11:47:51+00:00): Ich hätte eine kleine Bitte: Kannst du deine Changesets vielleicht etwas kleiner fassen? :D
Renaud58 (2023-09-27 09:57:36+00:00): Can you check if it's not against the good practice rule below:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_map_temporary_events_and_temporary_features
mkopinsky (2023-10-18 02:03:29+00:00): Thanks for all this hard work!

Several of the substations such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1166296640 you've marked as retired - I'm wondering whether those should be marked as `abandoned=yes` or even deleted entirely if they no longer exist at all.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-09-23 18:50:28+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/937525419

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
luisforte (2023-09-23 20:43:58+00:00): Sem qualquer resposta sua, estes seus conjuntos de edições serão revertidos.
Luis
NorthCrab_upload (2023-09-23 19:00:26+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/937525419

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
SHARCRASH (2024-01-02 19:25:17+00:00): Salut m sartor! 

Ce ne sont pas les barrières qui indiquent les droits légaux d'un chemin et donc son utilisation/type et elles peuvent être ouvertes, ce sont les panneaux de signalisation. Dans ce cas, le C2 est du côté W. Il indique que l’accès est interdit dans les deux sens aux conducteurs de véhicules et d’animaux à l’exception des riverains (propriétaires, locataires), de leurs fournisseurs et exceptions via modèle 5a (panneau blanc en dessous).

https://legilux.public.lu/eli/etat/leg/code/route/20230708

Au delà de ça, c'est vrai que ce panneau n'est pas toujours présent mais on voit bien que le chemin est trop étroit ou il y a un énorme block, etc...

Je ne t'avais pas déjà expliqué?
m sartor (2024-01-03 07:36:33+00:00): Salut, Merci pour ta précision. Je comprends que mon explication n'est pas correct. Quand même il y a des panneaux C2 exception cyclistes sur les deux côtés du chemin.

Si je me souviens correctement tu m'as expliqué de ne pas utiliser un cyclepath s'il s'agit d'un chemin mixte. Ce que j'ai respecté, j'ai utilisé un path comme tu m'as expliqué.

Les mêmes reflexions ont eu les personnes qui ont édité les sections de pistes cyclables PC6 Noertzange-Schifflange, Schifflange-Lallange&Mondercange, PC14 Mamer-Capellen et beaucoup de sections longeant la Moselle
SHARCRASH (2024-01-03 12:06:43+00:00): Oui des 2 cotés, ce qui confirme que tout ce chemin est aussi autorisé exceptionnellement pour les véhicules des riverains et fournisseurs. C'est un peu comme une route "living_street", les piétons peuvent y marcher légalement, les voiture aussi mais on ne va pas le tagger highway=path + motor_vehicle=yes +  foot=designated. La pertinence du track, c'est pour éviter ce genre d'accident: https://today.rtl.lu/news/luxembourg/a/1900714.html

Je ne me souviens pas de tout ce dont on avait parlé. :) Il y a aussi le cas du chemin mixte piétons, cyclistes, cavaliers mais non autorisé aux véhicules motorisés. Dans ce cas, en effet, il vaut mieux utiliser highway=path pour rester neutre + foot + bicycle + horse. Je viens de voir qu'au Belval, il y a un débutant qui a changé récemment tous les trottoirs en footway. Du coup on ne voit plus qu'ils sont autorisés aussi aux cyclistes et il a aussi dupliqué la piste cyclable le long de la Rue Marie Curie à Esch.

Une astuce pour éviter que les grosses routes cachent les pistes cyclables parallèles: mettre layer=1 (ou valeur supérieure) sur la piste comme ici https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1104053956

Et meilleurs voeux pour une bonne année! :)
MxxCon (2023-09-24 00:23:33+00:00): Hello.
You updated Tarachi to Martha's American Bistro, but kept the same phone number and website. Is that accurate?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141657533
bernardo60 (2023-10-27 05:50:55+00:00): This is a rural road part of the public network, giving access to fields and forests. Therefore highway=service should not be used.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141657966
Nakaner-repair (2023-09-23 19:14:02+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 140998105, 141001224, 141001493, 141001721, 141001917, 141066544, 141068415, 141070541, 141072338, 141074138, 141074945, 141075249, 141315288, 141369141, 141369171, 141369219, 141369298, 141369592, 141373300, 141389748, 141389835, 141389878, 141597255, 141612148, 141612768, 141612824, 141616675, 141646235, 141646318, 141646687, 141647013, 141647166, 141647252, 141647446, 141648484, 141651151, 141651240.
trigpoint (2023-09-24 16:35:09+00:00): Bore da
Just wondering why you have  changed the name of Ynys Dewi away from the local language name?

Diolch Phil
pitfire (2023-09-24 11:11:38+00:00): Hallo grossc,

Name – bitte nur vergeben, wenn der Hydrant auch wirklich einen Namen hat, siehe dazu DE:Namen#name_ist_nur_der_Name
Es handelt sich um: (ref=* 	Schlüsselnummer, siehe Schild Pos. 6. 	# (Numerischer Wert) 
Positionen der Felder auf einem Hydrantenschild.
Gruß pitfire
Fusselwurm (2023-09-23 19:52:30+00:00): ok das war dumm, ich hab unrecht. revert-script kann ich nich nutzen, weil mein login dafür nich akzeptiert wird. schade. also manuell rückgängig…
Glassman (2023-09-24 18:18:09+00:00): #TIP: Add a changeset comment - it will help you and others.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141658636
sirorezka (2023-09-24 14:55:13+00:00): Oh, thx, there is a note about adding organ to the map. You may consider closing it.
kwiatek_123 (2023-09-23 20:03:05+00:00): Jakie jest źródło zmiany?
kaltuna (2024-01-12 01:36:32+00:00): Hallo,
kannst Du als Ersteller der betroffenen ways zu diesem Hinweismarker Stellung nehmen ? Danke Dir. https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4060480
GUFSZ (2024-01-12 10:48:39+00:00): Er ist teilweise kein Erstersteller, sondern hat alte Wege gelöscht, statt umzutaggen. Dabei hat er auch die zwei GG-Relationen unterbrochen. Was sich auch nicht erschließt, warum der Übergang mit 45 Grad zu den zwei Feldwegen verläuft. Das lässt sich nicht aus dem Luftbild, was als Quelle genannt wird herleiten. Da ich in den letzten Tagen immer wieder da drüber gefahren bin, weiß ich auch nicht wie man darauf kommt. Was das mit Mikromapping zu tun hat, erschließt sich mir nicht.
Syl (2023-09-23 20:38:33+00:00): Bonsoir, est-ce qu'il serait possible de faire des modifications sur des zones plus petites et de préciser le numéro des notes concernées ? En l'état c'est très dur de suivre ce qui a été fait pour une note en particulier.
GeorgeKaplan (2023-09-24 10:47:35+00:00): Bonjour, je traite les notes par lots en cherchant des mots clés avec https://ent8r.github.io/NotesReview/ 
 sur des zones géographiques assez étendues.
J'en traite une douzaine et j'envoie changeset et traitements des notes depuis JOSM. Au passage, j'ai vu que j'ai loupé une note hier que tu as fermé, merci.

Pour le lien changeset<->notes, j'ai installé le plugin adéquat dans JOSM mais je n'ai pas réussi à l'utiliser (mon erreur ou un bug ?).

Je peux essayer de réduire les zones traitées avec plusieurs mots-clés. En revanche, ajouter manuellement le numéro de la note au changeset va être laborieux, où les faire apparaitre ? Sous quel format ?

George