piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2024-06-26 19:58:24+00:00): Hi RoyRyser, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1296449317

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-07-01 12:30:36+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/153219462

The user immediately deleted her/his own beach.
sheikchilli (2024-07-03 16:30:54+00:00): likely spam POI. link is not reachable

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153510218
miluethi (2024-06-26 22:54:15+00:00): Please narrow down the shapes of your buildings. Nearly all of the are too big. Thank you.
nickvet419 (2024-08-02 22:47:08+00:00): same with Blue Star Memorial Woods the woods, the preserve boundaries, and entrance are marked as separate features.
miluethi (2024-06-26 22:28:15+00:00): Hi,

Your building shapes are mostly too big compared to the aerial imagery. Do not include shadows and empty spaces around buildings please.

Thank you for your contribution to OSM Nicaragua
yarnlion (2024-07-17 00:27:55+00:00): Minor update, I went through here yesterday 2024-07-15 and that section of road has been removed! The area is still under construction, but a new curb has been added along 8th Street where that road used to meet it.
emersonveenstra (2024-06-26 20:41:11+00:00): The name is on the bridge itself, the highway isn't named "Mackinac Bridge", it's on the Mackinac Bridge, so it's not accurate to add that to the name tag
tdusgs (2024-06-26 20:45:31+00:00): that makes sense. Thanks for clarifying.
Road–Runner (2024-11-03 12:47:52+00:00): please don't use path for via_ferrata, it doesn't matter if its not visible on the main map
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-27 23:47:21+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16314
threefoursixninefour (2024-06-26 20:47:45+00:00): Sources: Survey, GPS, Aerial imagery
silversurfer83 (2024-06-27 07:35:31+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap :)

danke, dass du hilfst, die Karte zu verbessern.

Zu deiner Änderung hier würde ich dir gerne ein, zwei Hinweise hinterlassen, die dir vielleicht in Zukunft etwas helfen:

Namen werden bei OSM bitte nicht als Beschreibung genutzt. Dafür gibt es ein eigenens Feld "Beschreibung" (description). 
Für reine Dächer haben wir im Bereich "Gebäude" den Wert "Dach" im Angebot. Damit kannst du das Vordach sauber erfassen. Einen privaten Freisitz erfassen wir meistens nicht weiter. Zumindest hab ich auf die Schnelle nichts relevantes im Wiki gefunden.

A pro pos Wiki. Hier findest du viele nützliche Informationen, die dir weiterhelfen. Und wenn du daraus nicht schlau wirst gibt es viele engagierte Mapper*innen, die dir gerne weiterhelfen:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contact_channels

bei Fragen also immer raus damit :)

silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153221194
NieWnen (2024-07-02 18:49:32+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4316186
adamsc (2024-07-02 19:53:43+00:00): Już jest otwarte. Sprawdzę jutro albo w czwartek, czy na pewno się nic nie zmieniło i zamknę uwagę.
DavidFactChex (2024-06-26 21:26:38+00:00): Newest ways !
skquinn (2024-06-26 21:46:31+00:00): Please clarify what you mean by this?
DavidFactChex (2024-06-26 21:27:35+00:00): Newest ways now
DavidFactChex (2024-06-26 21:27:55+00:00): Newest ways now
DavidFactChex (2024-06-26 21:30:43+00:00): Changeset with #666 at the end - and by a user called "HellMap"
DavidFactChex (2024-06-26 21:31:46+00:00): Changeset with 666 at the end- and by user named HellMap
HellMap (2024-06-26 21:39:53+00:00): lol
NorthCrab_upload (2024-06-26 21:50:31+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12013283310

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Adam Dunn (2024-06-27 03:56:47+00:00): Thank you for your contribution to OSM!
For the boat launch, I've updated the tags so that it now has leisure=slipway. This way, the server knows what it is, and can show the little boat ramp icon. Thank you for making the Nova Scotia map a little bit better.
mueschel (2024-06-27 17:55:18+00:00): Hi,
could you check your recent edits? I found 8 large areas with only four foreign tags that seem to be duplicates of boundaries that already exist in OSM.
adas (2024-06-28 21:21:53+00:00): Probably I fixed it.
mueschel (2024-06-30 10:10:43+00:00): The objects are still there. E.g. this
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1296471451
is a duplicate of
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1268974492
tastrax (2024-06-30 05:37:10+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, +61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
tyfi (2024-06-26 22:30:37+00:00): These were the original ones from TIGER, but they were far off from correct location. Another mapper nearly a decade ago drew them in at the correct place without moving/deleting these, and so I am now.
ivanbranco (2024-06-27 07:11:48+00:00): Ciao TRA6, che fonte hai utilizzato per disegnare la rotonda? A me risulta sia 110 metri a sud-ovest, la puoi intravedere su Strava heatmap, ho anche registrato una traccia gps qualche mese fa (e coincide con Strava): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/ivanbranco/traces/11332452
Andrea Musuruane (2024-06-28 15:40:36+00:00): Ciao. Quello indicato da Ivan non è l'unico problema. La relazione https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9093226#map=18/45.28016/8.37042 ora ha un bel buco in corrispondenza della rotonda. Ciao, Andrea
TRA6 (2024-07-11 21:39:53+00:00): Ciao Ivan e Andrea.
Vi ringrazio per aver sottolineato gli errori che avevo commesso, sono andato a rivedere , ora sembra essere corretto.

Per ivan, come fonte prima ho usato una stima per iniziare a tracciare la rotonda, ora è stata spostata in base a due miei rilevamenti gps. (ho tenuto quello dei due che si sovrapponeva di più al tuo)

Grazie, Ciao a tutti.
Airis11 (2024-06-26 22:58:10+00:00): #btcmap
dvdhoven (2024-06-27 05:46:01+00:00): Ik heb die vreemde rondlopers in de Bierenstraat ongedaan gemaakt. Het zijn gewoon haakse kruisingen op een punaise. Het verkeer loopt daar niet rond.
Verder had je voor de zoveelste keer fiets- en wandelroutes onderbroken
en bij één van de punaise was ook een wandelknooppunt totaal in het ongerede geraakt.
Aline Machado (2024-06-27 17:26:37+00:00): 95 Express are physically separated tolled freeway lanes. The segments south of Atlantic Blvd were open in mid 2023 and started tolling in November 2023.
Typowy Miłośnik Autobusów (2024-06-27 16:49:14+00:00): Please do not edit operators, if you do not know who the operator is. Trolleybus lines in Lublin some time ago have been tagged with wrong wikidata "articles". The operator is ZTM Lublin, because it manages routes and departures times; MPK Lublin only manages vehicles. Also to one of the bike sharing stations you assigned a network from a city over 300km away.
Necessarycoot72 (2024-06-27 18:10:30+00:00): Reverted in changeset 153260063
NorthCrab_upload (2024-06-27 01:20:22+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/156709104

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
JessAk71 (2024-06-27 04:38:25+00:00): Hi AKittyCat, thanks for your edits. I noticed some issues with this changeset. You may have inadvertently dragged the node for this bar and connected it to a highway: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2625350848 I have fixed this one for you. But mainly the issue is with deleting and remaking the building for the Egg here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1296514152 deleting it removes all the change history associated with it when you could have moved it instead. Regardless, I think the previous version was a bit more accurate in terms of location and structure shape as it had more nodes for the curves, accounted for the parallax in the aerial imagery, and used the NY state orthos for more positional accuracy than Bing. Currently the new building you made represents the building at an angle in the imagery and is not actually where it sits on the ground. Also you removed the relation to the pedestrian area. Please be more careful in future edits if you can or leave questions about things on notes if you are not sure about something. I have not fixed this issue as its complicated to do so.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-06-27 03:19:34+00:00): Why are you tagging bus only ways as general access?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153226003
rskedgell (2024-07-22 13:34:45+00:00): @Spaghetti Monster because users of Busmiles have a Discord group where they discuss how to tag for the renderer so that their bus journeys logged on that site "snap" to OpenStreetMap.

They rarely take the trouble to understand what OSM access tags actually mean, do not respond to changeset comments and do not care that their edits have adverse consequences for real-World users of OSM data.

IMHO any changeset which mentions busmiles and misapplies access tags should be reverted immediately and the user reported to DWG.

Ideally, Busmiles would start using bus route relations instead of doing undisclosed and uncredited routing with OSM data. Failing that, executing 'rm -rf ./' from the root of their source tree would be great.
seattlefyi (2024-07-07 14:43:08+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM! Thanks for the edits, it's a good start! I went ahead and adjusted some of your edits a bit - squaring building corners, adding tags. Also, please be careful not to copy from most other maps, and services during your "cross-referencing" that OSM doesn't have permission to use (due to copyright). Thanks again!
MKBE_ (2024-06-27 02:07:57+00:00): This account’s gonna have to be scrapped bc of this bot reverting every single one of my edits ever
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-06-27 08:41:13+00:00): Bruh I literally commented on the changeset. Maybe read your email
rskedgell (2024-07-24 10:29:39+00:00): @MKBE_ maybe you shouldn't have made so many damaging, unverifiable and incorrect edits? They're easy to spot with QA software, so even if you create a less obvious sock puppet than @MKBE_2, you'll still waste the time of a lot of real human beings (not bots) who care about the integrity and accuracy of OSM data for ALL of its data consumers.
JessAk71 (2024-06-27 03:59:26+00:00): Hi AKittyCat,
Thanks for your updates. I think you may have inadvertently dragged this node: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10613573203 of the service road to an incorrect location, I have fixed it for you. Make sure to be on the look out for accidental changes you may have made.
JessAk71 (2024-06-27 03:54:24+00:00): Hi AKittyCat,
Thanks for updating the map. I noticed you may have inadvertently added a building tag to the school area here, since the entire area for the school grounds is not a building, I went ahead and removed it.
emersonveenstra (2024-06-28 15:05:20+00:00): Hi there,

Did you mean to make this a primary_link? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/42239468
Handi Suhendra (2024-06-27 05:14:16+00:00): Esai tentang pengalaman lebih baik daripada mengobati cinta namun demikian dalam penelitian tersebut atau bengkuang
SpecializedRider (2024-06-27 05:57:11+00:00): Spam comment from new user account created today.
ZLima12 (2024-06-27 02:55:21+00:00): Hi,

It looks like you deleted three good tags from this relation. Can you elaborate about why you did this?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153226512
Albe_ (2024-07-05 16:44:46+00:00): Moi! Voisitko kysyä maanomistajalta, millä perusteella täällä ei saisi kulkea jalalla tai pyörällä? Kunhan ei kulje pihan läpi ja kääntyy takaisin, tietysti. Olipa aika komea ja rauhallinen polku kun täällä kävin eilen kurkkaamassa.
Tomi K (2024-07-05 17:09:00+00:00): En tunne häntä henkilökohtaisesti eikä ole yhteystietoja. Hän sattui olemaan hollilla, kun tuolla ajoin ja pyysi, että hänen kotirauhaansa kunnioitettaisiin. Kysyin ihan suoraan, että saako ko. teitä pitkin ajaa ja vastaus oli sama. Lisäksi mainitsi, että usein ajaa työkoneilla ympäristössä.

Itse olen yleensä maanomistajien pyyntöjä kunnioittanut, mutta mikään ei estä ottamasta merkintöjä pois.
OldManCelli (2024-06-27 17:02:25+00:00): Hello Jinno09. Thanks for mapping, but the name field is used to indicate the name of the building or feature. Mall is not a good name. Also shop=mall is not correct either. I would just go with building=retail when mapping a large building with many shops in it.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153229502
GanderPL (2024-06-27 13:41:40+00:00): Naprawdę jest tam "Maryo"?
GzS (2024-06-27 13:44:58+00:00): tak, różnie pisano wszak w dawnych czasach, pierwsze zasady spójne pisowni polskiej opublikowano dopiero w 1936 r.
◪ Jarv (2024-06-27 12:40:30+00:00): Hi Ravi18, you've requested a review on this change. Looks fine. However you can press "Q" once you've drawn the shape to give it 90 degree angles. Also the building could have been tagged with "house" instead of "yes"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153229795
Gregory Peony (2024-11-02 19:44:41+00:00): You also extended (modified) a highway in this changeset. Please check that your comment is accurate when uploading.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153230421
angys (2024-06-27 06:03:28+00:00): Source
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/angys/traces/11387221
infeeeee (2024-06-27 14:39:02+00:00): Visszavonva. Kérlek csak legális források használatával térképezz a továbbiakban

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153251073
nurdafur (2024-08-15 11:14:43+00:00): Hallo Thomaso

Sollte da im Osmc:symbol blau statt grün stehen?

Liebe Grüsse und weiterhin viel Spass beim Kartografieren
Urs
Thomaso58 (2024-08-16 07:30:40+00:00): Hallo Urs
Du hast recht. Das war ein Schreibfehler. Ich habe ja unten symbol weiss blau weiss geschrieben. Und bei der Kontrolle mit Locus Map sieht man es nicht mehr, weil grün könnte da schon Sinn machen. Route.

Ich hätte behauptet, das könnte mir so nicht passieren. Jaaaaaa die Wahrheit kann manchmal hart sein.

LG Thomas
Thomaso58 (2024-08-16 14:15:41+00:00): Hallo Urs
Das green oder blau ist eine Auswahlliste bei der ich um eine Zeile verrutscht bin. Mein Gesichtsverlust ich nur teilweise nicht ganz.
LG Thomas
skorasaurus (2024-06-27 20:18:53+00:00): Thanks for adding; I never knew that was a cemetery.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153231507
divaddivag (2024-06-27 09:41:30+00:00): Bonjour, les liens sécurisés en https sont préférables aux http dès lors qu'ils sont dispos comme c'était le cas pour ce camping. Merci de mettre à jour votre système de rapprochement.
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2024-06-27 10:19:40+00:00): Bonjour,

Merci de votre alerte.
La correction a été effectuée
Cordialement,
L'Equipe DB
GanderPL (2024-06-27 07:43:33+00:00): Po pierwsze nie opisuj zmian w stylu "obsolete", ponieważ nic nie przekazałeś, tylko że było tutaj coś, co uznałeś za przestarzałe. Pisz "usunięcie nieistniejących zabudowań".
GanderPL (2024-06-27 07:45:07+00:00): Po drugie, jeśli ta zmiana zaszła stosunkowo niedawni, może być lepiej zamienić status tych zabudowań na wyburzone, zamiast usuwać obiekty. Wyburzone oznacza się prefiksem "demolished:"

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

Pozostają wtedy na mapie jako duchy, i zostaną usunięte przy modyfikacji obszaru lub gdy już na żadnych mapach nie bedzie po nich śladu.
woodpeck (2024-06-27 07:26:10+00:00): Dear MapMasterMike, please follow the automated editing guidelines for any algorithm-based editing like this one, and then point to the community discussion in your changeset so that people can be assured that this has been properly discussed. In the discussion, please explain clearly what algorithms you are planning to use to identify objects to be deleted or modified. 

And while not technically required, your credibility would certainly benefit from explaining how someone with two weeks of OSM experience is already applying technical fixes around the planet ;)
urbalazs (2024-06-27 06:55:12+00:00): Szia Dávid! Visszavontam a tegnapi összes módosításcsomagodat a közösséggel egyeztetve. Az OpenStreetMap térképet nem a megjelenítőknek van az útvonaltervezőknek készítjük, hanem egy általánosan elfogadott szabály szerint. Az útvonaltervezőknek kell alkalmazkodni az adatokhoz és nem fordítva. Kérlek, hogy hagyd abba a fiktív elnevezéseket, nem az útvonaltervezőknek térképezünk.
urbalazs (2024-06-27 07:00:24+00:00): Visszavont módosításcsomagok:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153232369
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153203665
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153203373
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153201719
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153192884
Szente Dávid (2024-06-27 07:54:50+00:00): Kedves Balázs!
Kérlek segíts megérteni a problémát, hogy megfelelően együtt tudjunk működni. Az általam véghezvitt módosítások kizárólag helyi, ott élő emberek által jelzett hiányzó gyalogutakról szóltak, melyek műholdas felvételeken és utcaképeken is egyértelműen megtalálhatók. Az valóban tényszerű, hogy ezek az észrevételek azért születtek, mert útvonaltervezőben tűnt nekik fel, hogy létezne olyan egyszerűbb útvonal, amely nem szerepel a térképen. 
Leírásod alapján úgy érzem, hogy ott hibáztam, hogy a közérthetőség miatt a gyalogútnak leíró nevet is megadtam. Azonban ettől eltekintve a térkép részletességét és pontosságát elősegítettem, a térképet használó felhasználók számára a használatot komfortosabbá tettem.
urbalazs (2024-06-27 10:07:02+00:00): Jól látod a problémát, és a közösségből is jelezték páran, hogy elég lett volna csak a neveket törölnöm, nem pedig mindent visszavonni. Elnézésedet kérem emiatt, de mivel nem sok munka volt benne, egyszerűbb volt most a visszavonás. Nem a gyalogutakkal van a probléma, hanem a name=* értékkel, hiszen ezeknek a járdáknak valójában nincs nevük. Az állomásokhoz vezető járdák hasznosak, szerintem azt könnyedén visszarajzolod, mert csak néhány vonalról van szó. Ha lehet, akkor ne a Bing alapján rajzolj, mert nagyon pontatlan helyenként, akár több méterrel is el lehet tolódva a valós pozícióhoz képest. Rajzolás előtt győződj meg arról, hogy a műholdkép illesztése megfelelő-e. A FÖMI ortofotót lehet alapul venni, az általában pontos.
Szente Dávid (2024-06-27 11:05:37+00:00): Köszönöm jelzésed, ez így szerintem teljesen korrekt.
philippec (2024-06-27 23:03:32+00:00): Maak dan een note.
Jordi MF (2024-06-28 10:35:40+00:00): Hola Miguelstk,

Gracias por mejorar la base de datos de OSM. Hemos visto que has mejorado Sestrica, pero hay algunos elementos que no se han mapeado bien.

En primer lugar, el área residencial no debe de tener el nombre de la población tal y como se indica en la wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dresidential#Named_residential_areas

En segundo lugar, algunos elementos no deben de tener nombres descriptivos (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions). Me refiero a los estanques (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1296565830) o al parque (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1296565834).

Lo corregiré. Espero que lo puedas tener en cuenta en futuras ediciones.
Saludos,
Jordi
infeeeee (2024-06-27 14:39:03+00:00): Visszavonva. Kérlek csak legális források használatával térképezz a továbbiakban

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153251073
tguen (2025-02-15 01:24:14+00:00): According to Bing Streetside imagery, this hotel is not signed Oceanside Beach. This information belongs in the branch tag.
Leo Slager (2024-06-27 10:51:19+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
ovitters (2024-06-28 18:33:11+00:00): Van deze verandering klopt niks van. Ik ga een revert aanvragen.
Leo Slager (2024-06-28 18:54:13+00:00): Reverted with my changeset 153306975
Leo Slager (2024-06-28 18:55:48+00:00): @ovitters
Ben je daar plaatselijk bekend?
Kun je ook aangeven wat er niet klopt?
Is er sprake van vandalisme?
Leo Slager (2024-06-28 19:01:23+00:00): Er lijkt hier sprake te zijn van een misverstand.
Waarschijnlijk was het de bedoeling de wegen open te stellen voor brandweer/ambulance.
@Michael:
Laat me dat even weten.
Als de wegen nog zijn afgesloten voor overige verkeersdeelnemers dan kunnen we dat aanpassen:
vehicle=no
emergency=yes
roelant (2024-06-28 19:18:21+00:00): Hoi Leo Slager, 

Er is ook een bijbehorend forumtopic waar ik dezelfde vragen heb gesteld, heb je daar getagt, vanaf hier:

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/ongedaan-maken-van-een-foutive-osm-aanpassing/115304/2

...  legt ovitters uit waarom hij de changeset niet juist vindt.

Hartelijke groet,
Roelant.
marczoutendijk (2024-06-28 14:48:04+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16320

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
The Polish (2024-06-28 16:54:58+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/227665141

Z jakiego powodu zmieniłeś nazwę ulicy dodając skrót "gen."?
Leszek Czudek (2024-06-28 17:32:21+00:00): Takie brzmienie nazwy jest w: (1) rejestrze TERYT, (2) Państwowym Rejestrze Granic (PRG), (3) Bazie Ewidencji Miejscowości, Ulic i Adresów (EMUiA) prowadzonej przez UM w Cieszynie.
The Polish (2024-06-28 17:35:02+00:00): Zapoznaj się proszę z obowiązującym nazewnictwem ulic na OSM:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Znakowanie_dr%C3%B3g_w_Polsce#Nazewnictwo_ulic
Leszek Czudek (2024-06-28 17:44:28+00:00): No właśnie, tak tam jest napisane: "Tytuły w nazwach, np. generała, profesora, księdza, stosujemy tylko wtedy, jeśli taki tytuł występuje w materiałach urzędowych...". Przytoczyłem Ci aż trzy rejestry urzędowe, w których jest "gen.". Brzmienie bez "gen.", czyli "Władysława Sikorskiego" występuje tylko w bazie PESEL, ale ta baza nie jest właściwa do rozstrzygania o prawidłowym brzmieniu nazwy ulicy. O nazwie decyduje w pierwszej kolejności uchwała rady miejskiej, a następnie baza EMUiA, która niejako rejestruje uchwały. Bazy PRG i TERYT są pochodnymi wobec tej pierwszej.
Kenesbay (2024-07-07 15:45:07+00:00): В карту, на этом точке в место дорожный знак опасности "Лежачий полицейский" ошибочно установлен "Уступи дорогу". Связи с тем прошу Вас на этом точке установить знак опасности "Лежачий полицейский".
ivanbranco (2024-06-27 08:57:23+00:00): Ciao Lorenzo,

qual é il significato del tag date=* con type=route? Sulla wiki il tag viene descritto solo in relazione ai tag historic=* e amenity=clock.

grazie e buon mapping