piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
hayes9 (2023-06-02 21:18:12+00:00): Hello VincenteBarraFM, the resource you've provided does show that street "Profesor Alberto Zañartu" is now an eastbound only roadway. Thank you for this relevant information and for working to correct the OSM data.
Carto'Cité (2023-08-09 17:43:51+00:00): Bonjour nihombashi19,
Je me permets de te contacter pour savoir quel élément selon toi justifierai de mettre bicycle=designated sur ce chemin : 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/437351010
Il finit par un escalier et n'appartient pas à un itinéraire donc je pense que le designated n'est pas adapté. Je modifie dans ce sens mais si tu as la moindre information qui le justifie je procèderai au rétablissement.🙂
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-06-13 13:41:38+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4804376 - can you take a look?

is it really cycleway where cyclists are banned?
lucumon (2024-04-06 21:42:08+00:00): Why did you delete level and layer tags on "Estación de Autobuses" platform??
FvGordon (2024-04-06 22:16:41+00:00): I have added the level again. But layer=0 is the default and never set as an own attribute.
mueschel (2023-06-05 10:04:32+00:00): Hi,
please check this way, it got a couple of strange tags:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1178180640

traffic_mode:foot;both = motor_vehicle
highway = *
Tomasz Herud (2023-06-27 18:43:54+00:00): Cześć! Dlaczego oznaczyłeś odcinek szlaku, który nigdy nie był oznakowany w terenie?
arukuni (2023-07-12 11:03:59+00:00): O ile dobrze rozumiem, szlaki i inne trasy nie muszą być oznakowane w terenie, do samego oznakowania służy tag "trailblazed".
Oznaczyłem odcinek szlaku na podstawie dokumentu opisującego jego przebieg.
Tomasz Herud (2023-07-13 12:37:34+00:00): Na jakiej podstawie tak rozumujesz? OSM co do zasady prezentuje to co istnieje, a nie to co chcielibyśmy, żeby istniało.
arukuni (2023-07-17 13:15:55+00:00): Generalnie tak, ale nie wszystko co jest w OSM musi mieć fizyczne odwzorowanie.
Ustalenie trasy rowerowej na zasadzie "urzędnicy ustalili, że tędy biegnie trasa" jest w sumie tym samym co "zarząd transportu ustalił że tędy biegnie trasa autobusu" - moim zdaniem w obu przypadkach warto to odzworować w OSM.
Tomasz Herud (2023-07-17 13:28:28+00:00): Jacy urzędnicy ustalili, że tam biegnie jakaś trasa? GZM faktycznie zamówiła studium sieci tras, ale decyzja o ich realizacji nigdy nie zapadła. 
Czego chyba najlepszym dowodem jest to, że pdf z tym studium zostało ściągnięte z oficjalnej strony GZM.
W obecnej sytuacji dodawanie tych przebiegów wprowadza wyłącznie chaos i zamęt.
Dimitar155 (2023-06-03 09:28:10+00:00): Hi TrailJunkie,

From where did you get the information about the access restriction in this area?

Best wishes,
Dimitar
TrailJunkie (2023-06-06 16:03:45+00:00): Hi Dimitar, Thank you for reaching out. While working in the area I noticed that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1028909361 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1028658686 both have the tag “motor_vehicle=destination” that was added by https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Nadejda%20Nenkova. Since these tags are present at the entrance of of this residential neighborhood, I applied “motor_vehicle=destination” to all the roads behind it for consistency, as the area seems like it’s for “local traffic only” (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Ddestination). Happy Mapping!
Carto'Cité (2023-09-25 08:05:14+00:00): Bonjour ZekOwney,
Je me permets de repasser cette voie verte en path :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1121689016
En effet, sauf cas particuliers, ce type d'aménagement ne doit pas être décrit en cycleway : il est partagé avec les piétons, ne comporte pas de signalétique qui permet de le qualifier de piste cyclable et comporte une signalétique voie verte (panneau C115). Je comprends la tentation de passer ce type d'aménagement en piste pour les voir ressortir sur les rendus mais il ne faut surtout pas le faire, il vaut mieux observer les rendus qui les mettent bien en valeur et je te conseille à ce sujet le rendu CyclOSM :  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136846134#map=16/49.1297/-0.3026&layers=Y
Je reste à ta disposition si tu as la moindre question 🙂
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #VeloNormandie
ZekOwney (2023-09-25 08:24:28+00:00): Bonjour Charles. Effectivement j'ai dû modifier un peu vite sur l'ensemble de cette opération.
Merci de ta vigilance :)
Carto'Cité (2023-09-25 08:38:36+00:00): Merci beaucoup pour ton retour et le fait de bien prendre mes remarques 😀
On peut tous se tromper et si tu penses que moi aussi je me trompe alors n'hésite pas à me le dire 👍

J'en profite pour t'informer d'autres modifications quej vais faire et sur lesquelles tu peux bien-entendu m'interpeler également.
Ici par exemple on est typiquement dans un aménagement non réglementaire donc un peu particulier à décrire et qui va faire l'objet d'une exception :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1178183389
Il s'agit clairement d'un trottoir donc on ne va pas déformer la réalité et on va le laisser en trottoir : highway=footway + footway=sidewalk (ce qui implique le foot=designated mais on peut quand-même l'ajouter). Mais ce trottoir est effectivement cyclable donc bicycle=designated. Et enfin il comporte un panneau voie verte C115 donc va le préciser mais ça ne justifie pas de le passer en cycleway=path car ça reste fondamentalement un trottoir.

À ta disposition pour en discuter.
Charles
ZekOwney (2023-09-25 08:54:09+00:00): Concernant, pour voir ce trottoir au quotidien, je confirme l'usage mixte, voire le stationnement de véhicules...

Je note tes remarques et je tâcherai d'y réfléchir à deux fois sur les tags cycles/piétons/...
Xvtn (2023-12-14 20:14:57+00:00): Hi, thanks for your contribution! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes. Looks good to me, no complaints. Welcome to OSM!
uprkos (2024-01-01 22:00:48+00:00): Czy ten parking to nie jest pomyłka? Jest na węźle łączącym dwie drogi.

Ponadto: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4045021
grensv (2023-08-16 14:40:41+00:00): Le chemin 305666218 a été passé par Sabrina en track ail y a 3 mois alors qu'il était correctement en Highway auparavant. Après vérification sur le terrain, je le repasse en highway (goudronnée).
Frans S (2023-06-06 10:20:42+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are quite accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards. However, Not all rectangular buildings have been squared.
Multiple buildings have been drawn as 1 building. Each building need to be mapped individually.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136846814
muralito (2023-06-01 23:45:54+00:00): Hola Carlos. Gracias por los aportes.

El colegio como tal ya estaba mapeado aca https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4466859602

El edificio lleva nombre si realmente lo tiene, pero generalmente no es el mismo que el de la institución.
map per (2023-06-02 07:00:14+00:00): Hello Toni Schmid-Padovan,

please don't add duplicates to the OpenStreetMaps database. Utha Beach Camping had already been mapped (1). I removed the two duplicates you added.

Best regards
map per

(1) https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/174134583
map per (2023-06-02 07:02:55+00:00): And by the way: There is a furtherdevelopment of Maps.me called Organic Maps, I switched to the new App a while ago
pitfire (2023-06-02 11:08:12+00:00): Hallo Klettermaxe1,
was hat dich veranlasst deine Wegverbindung zu löschen. Ohne die Ecke genau zu kennen, ist im Luftbild die Verbindung real erkennbar!
Gruß pitfire
Klettermaxe1 (2023-06-02 14:45:38+00:00): Hallo pitfire,
tatsächlich hatte mich jemand angeschrieben und gesagt, dass ich einen Weg löschen sollte. Da ich mir nicht sicher war welche, habe ich beide Wege gelöscht, die infrage kamen. Ich habe sie jetzt aber wieder hinzugefügt, also alles wieder beim Alten!
Viele Grüße Klettermaxe1
emersonveenstra (2023-06-02 11:19:51+00:00): Hi,

Did you mean to remove https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14950691/history ?
habi (2023-06-08 19:52:38+00:00): Ciao pokulo

Der `sport`-Tag wird normalerweise mit einem klein geschriebenen Sport befüllt, wie du (z.B.) bei https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/sport=hornussen#overview sehen kannst.
(Ich dachte nicht, dass in der Schweiz schon 70 solche Tags sind).

Ich habe das in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137110488 korrigiert,
Gruss,
habi
pokulo (2023-06-10 16:10:44+00:00): Thanks @habi made my changes with osmand, I feel some suggested tags there are little off, missing.

Thanks for the links.
charles chilufya (2023-06-01 22:16:49+00:00): Nice work
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136848108
eggie (2023-07-16 19:25:50+00:00): Beste Hendrikklaas,
Waarom maak je zo'n stukje nijverheid nu niet gewoon af?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-07-16 20:04:20+00:00): HK  Dit triggert medemappers die hele stukken wit zien zonder tagging omdat je kennelijk met de beste bedoelingen sloten wil intekenen, maar daar niet aan toe komt.
Wanneer je van die grote stukken aanpakt gaat dat inderdaad niet lukken.
Waarom niet één stukje van een polder afmaken en dan aan het volgende beginnen.
Wat allemaal los lag heb ik aan elkaar geschoven nu. 
De sloten kun je gewoon uitsnijden.
One feature one element.
Wanneer de oogst hooi is dan gewoon landuse=grass lijkt mij. Niet nogmaals landuse=farmalnad met natural=grassland. Die tag is voor ander sort grasgebieden. landuse=farmland gebruiken we bij ons voor akkerland en niet voor hooilanden.
MVG
eggie
emersonveenstra (2023-06-02 11:25:04+00:00): Hi,

Abbreviations of names and street addresses are incorrect, could you please expand them to their full name? Thanks!
eggie (2023-06-02 06:26:24+00:00): Dag motje..  Eigenlijk kun je geen OV routes bewerken met editor iD.
Dat kan alleen goed met editor JOSM.
Alles zit immers in een relatie en editor iD maakt die relaties stuk.

Ik heb e.e.a. aangepast.
Hier is trouwens veel meer veranderd.
 
editor josm stap voor stap 

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/editor-josm-stap-voor-stap/75047 

MVG
eggie
HikeAndMap (2023-06-03 21:46:45+00:00): Hi there - I see in this edit you created buildings inside buildings - 

This is false, instead please read:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:part

Also - when changing worldwide - please upload your changes before moving to the next country/area to ensure it's easy for us all - yourself including - to keep that of what we're all doing on this beautiful database we call OpenStreetMap

Thank you
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136848662
charles chilufya (2023-06-03 22:02:45+00:00): hi, i can not track that edit, please make a screenshot or add the link to that changes i made and tagged. Outside my regional i only validate not really mapping unless otherwise or someone did that then i came in to modify something.
charles chilufya (2023-06-03 22:11:18+00:00): Great, seen and I'm working on them, Thanks. it was a mistake.
jxpsert (2023-06-01 22:47:29+00:00): Geen idee waarom de Pompekliniek hiermee aangepast is. Er is niks veranderd aan de node.
charles chilufya (2023-06-01 22:53:14+00:00): import small changeset.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136848826
jxpsert (2023-06-01 22:56:19+00:00): Not an import! I traced these parking spaces, then divided them using the ‘Gridify’ plugin in JOSM.
Taya_S (2023-06-02 06:30:55+00:00): The Pompekliniek node is kinda weird yeah. No changes, not even moved. Archavi doesnt even highlight it. 

Just randomly accusing a user of doing an import seems kinda rude to me. OSMCha's "possible import" warning is pretty bad. I'm pretty sure it just uses some sort of add to modify+delete ratio. Its very unreliable.
jaap de vries (2023-06-02 06:37:09+00:00): Blijkbaar heb je iets aangeklikt Jasper, want anders zou je bewerkingsgebied enkel bij de parkeerplaats van de AH XL zijn
jaap de vries (2023-06-02 06:40:32+00:00): En als je dan wil micro mappen wil je dan ook de parking tags goed zetten? Bijvoorbeeld de Pick-up points of de fast net parkeerplaatsen
charles chilufya (2023-06-02 07:06:00+00:00): Sorry if i have offended him. But i was just making a comment that highly import is really worry some especially if the imagery used is not defined . However, i have checked the data and verified as Good one.
Nice comment @Thiskal
jxpsert (2023-06-04 12:44:28+00:00): @jaap; Ik map wat ik weet. Ik zie enkel blauwe vlakken (ik neem aan dat dat die pickup plaatsen zijn?). Ook van fastned weet ik niet welke vakken dit zijn.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136848826
jaap de vries (2023-06-05 06:20:51+00:00): Jasper, ik mag toch aannemen dat je buiten bent geweest om de parkeerplaats te kunnen bekijken of doe jij micro mappen via de luie stoel aan de computer?
jxpsert (2023-06-05 06:24:11+00:00): Een paar honderd parkeervakken vind ik makkelijker via JOSM thuis dan op locatie elk vak handmatig tekenen.
jaap de vries (2023-06-05 09:57:16+00:00): Als je gaat micro mappen dan wil je graag op detail van alles vast leggen, dat kan niet via thuis dan moet je naar buiten. Ieder zijn eigen keuze daarin maar de parkeerplaats bevat nu wel fouten, los jij die dan op of zal ik als bekende bezoeker van de AH XL het doen?
jxpsert (2023-06-05 09:58:44+00:00): Wat is er fout dan? Ik zou eerder zeggen incompleet
VictorIE (2023-06-21 09:44:37+00:00): Thank you for adding wind turbines! :)
xDeamon (2023-06-03 21:35:32+00:00): Saresti così gentile da indicarmi tramite link la pagina della wiki che usi come fonte per la quale è necessario questo fantomatico segnale per classificare una strada come "trunk"? A me ed a tanti altri utenti non risulta affatto ed anzi è pieno di esempi che la raccontano diversamente come la tangenziale di Portogruaro, la SR348 nei pressi di Cornuda o il tratto di SS50bis/var nei pressi di Feltre, dove nessuna di queste presenta questi segnali che secondo te sono necessari.
Vorrei proprio capire perchè certe vanno bene e certe no.
tolioalessandro (2023-06-04 09:46:15+00:00): Ciao alessandrocarmeli,
la mappe di OpenStreetMap devono presentare uniformità in tutto il mondo. Per questo motivo non sono basate sul Codice della Strada di ciascun Paese attraversato, ma su una classificazione oggettiva delle strade, in base alle loro caratteristiche geometriche e funzionali, al fine di poterle classificare allo stesso modo in tutti gli Stati.

Prima di apportare qualsiasi modifica è quindi necessario consultare la wiki di openstreetmap, per verificare la correttezza delle modifiche che si vogliono apportare.

Nello specifico se visiti la pagina relativa alle strade "trunk" ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtrunk ), troverai che in Italia le strade "trunk" sono le cosiddette "strade a scorrimento veloce".
Tali strade non esistono nel Codice della Strada italiano, e pertanto non hanno uno specifico segnale di inizio e fine. 

Nella categoria "strada a scorrimento veloce" in Italia rientrano sia le strade che il Codice della Strada classifica come tipo B, ovvero le strade extraurbane principali, sia quelle che classifica come tipo C, strade extraurbane secondarie, che non presentino intersezioni a raso. 
A conferma di ciò c'è uno specifico paragrafo nella pagina Wikipedia sulla classificazione delle strade in Italia ( https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classificazioni_delle_strade_in_Italia#Strada_a_scorrimento_veloce ).

Il cartello che tu ti aspetti di vedere immagino sia il Fig. II 347 Art. 135 del Regolamento Attuativo del Codice della Strada, con sfondo blu. Tuttavia tale cartello indica l'inizio di una strada di tipo B, strada extraurbana principale, e non può essere usato per l'inizio di una strada tipo C senza intersezioni a raso. 

Quindi è del tutto normale che molte delle strade che trovi segnate come "trunk", "strade a scorrimento veloce", su openstreetmap, non presentino tale cartello; perchè tale cartello indica solo una delle due categorie di strade italiane che rientrano nella categoria "trunk" di openstreetmap.

Ti prego pertanto di ripristinare tutte le modifiche che hai apportato, attenendoti alle indicazioni presenti nella wiki di OpenStreetMap. Le modifiche che vanno contro la wiki si configurano come un atto vandalico ai danni della community di OpenStreetMap.

Se hai ulteriori dubbi o perplessità non esitare a contattarmi, resto a disposizione.

Grazie del tempo che dedichi ad OpenStreetMap, con le tue oltre 7500 modifiche.

A presto,

Alessandro
Elia Z (2023-06-04 10:12:29+00:00): Buongiorno, 

Mi unisco alle osservazioni mosse da altri colleghi mappatori. 
Le modifiche che stai apportando -per quanto tu ritenga siano il linea con il codice della strada italiano- sono, oltre che macroscopiche, poco rappresentative e migliorative a livello di dettaglio generale della mappa (non avvantaggiano nessuno).
Ti esorto a rivedere le tue modifiche in quanto quest'ultime creano un precedente incompatibile con la guida di Open Street Map .
Cordiali saluti.
alessandrocarmeli (2023-06-04 10:22:06+00:00): Grazie mille Alessandro ed elia per la dritta. Finalmente qualcuno che mi risponde in modo chiaro e specialmente in modo non offensivo!
xDeamon (2023-06-04 10:28:12+00:00): Ma stiamo scherzando? Ti dispiacerebbe indicarmi chi si è rivolto a te in modo offensivo?
edvac (2023-07-11 21:18:12+00:00): Dear alessandrocarmeli,

Since long ago, many local users complain about your edits, that apparently don't follow the rules of the wiki, like trunk road classification in Italy.

Instead of ignoring their comments, I invite you to follow what the Italian community has agreed on these matters, and discuss with them if you don't agree with something and want to change it. That's the only way; edit wars are unacceptable.

Best regards,

Rafael Avila Coya, on behalf of OSMF Data Working Group

Caro alessandrocarmeli,

Da tempo molti utenti locali si lamentano delle tue modifiche, che apparentemente non seguono le regole del wiki, come la classificazione delle strade statali in Italia.

Invece di ignorare i loro commenti, ti invito a seguire ciò che la comunità italiana ha concordato su questi argomenti, e a discutere con loro se non sei d'accordo con qualcosa e vuoi cambiarlo. Questo è l'unico modo; le guerre di modifica sono inaccettabili.

Cordiali saluti,

Rafael Avila Coya, a nome del Data Working Group, OSMF.

[ Ticket#2023071110000173]
eggie (2023-06-02 06:41:18+00:00): Dag motje

Bing is niet de ideale achtergrond en op veel plaatsen verouderd.
Je kunt beter PDOK actueel gebruiken. 
MVG
eggie
Glassman (2023-06-04 20:43:54+00:00): #TIP: square building by selecting the outline then just type a "q"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136849518
emersonveenstra (2023-06-02 11:23:31+00:00): Hi,

You added https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1178210539 with no tags, could you please go back and tag it? Thanks!
emersonveenstra (2023-06-02 11:27:34+00:00): Also, you added access=official on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/594239780, which doesn't really make sense. Could you explain what you were trying to do with this tag?
Dave Nadolsky (2023-06-05 16:06:39+00:00): Fixed the way ...539 tag issue. Also removed the "official" tag on way ...780. I'm an OpenStreetMap newbie, so gaining familiarity as I make edits in geographic areas I'm highly familiar with. This "way" was categorized as American Football Field. It's the game field for Rogers City High School football. I thought the Allowed Access field was method to identify the field isn't just open to the general public to use. It's only for official high school football games, or for use by the RCHS football team at coach's discretion. Feel free to mod in the proper way to convey this fact.
emersonveenstra (2023-06-06 12:50:36+00:00): Thanks! Tagging the football field as access=private would be the correct value, access=official is sort of a misnomer and isn't widely used, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access=official for more information
Glassman (2023-06-04 20:44:48+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136849976
archpdx (2024-08-09 09:41:21+00:00): Hi,

I noticed that this changeset adds airports that no longer exist, and where the land it sits on has already been redeveloped since. This would be more appropriate for OpenHistoricalMap (https://openhistoricalmap.org) as we map what's on the ground here on OSM (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Map_what's_on_the_ground)
Glassman (2023-06-04 20:45:29+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136850133
mueschel (2023-06-06 09:59:01+00:00): Hi,
you added many round buildings here. Looking at the aerial images I think that most of them are no buildings but trees or bushes. Please check this.
muralito (2023-06-02 13:20:34+00:00): Hola Iris.
La universidad como tal esta mapeada acá https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/291411192

Vos a lo que le pusiste nombre es a un edificio, que puede ser que el edificio lo tenga, pero no es "Universidad ..."
rodolfovargas (2023-06-02 19:55:05+00:00): Hola :)

Gracias por tus aportes a #OpenStreetMap #OSM.

Para enriquecer más los datos mapeados, puedes aplicar MAPILLARY para la colecta de fotografías georreferenciadas con tu dispositivo móvil (teléfono o tableta)
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.mapillary.app

Saludos.
mueschel (2023-06-05 10:00:15+00:00): Hi, "zone:rouge" is not a common tag. 
I guess you wanted to add 
parking:zone tags? 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Street_parking#Residential_parking_permits,_parking_zones
yxoc (2023-06-05 19:45:25+00:00): Hi, I am currently in the process of migrating our old tagging scheme of street parking to the new Street Parking scheme. In Montrouge we have all street parking mapped separately. In this case, zone information should go on the parking itself (amenity=parking).

The page that you cite says about separately mapped parkings: "The tagging of physical and legal properties is identical to the tagging on the centre line, except there is no prefix parking:side"

-yxoc
yxoc (2023-06-05 20:35:40+00:00): This is also described on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:zone, in the section talking about separately mapped parkings.

If there is a zone:rouge on a highway this is of course wrong, I hope I haven't left any of these?

-yxoc
mueschel (2023-06-06 07:46:34+00:00): Hi,
the 'zone' key itself is perfectly fine - my comment was more about the "rouge" suffix which I don't understand.
yxoc (2023-06-06 18:54:30+00:00): Hi,

Indeed, "zone" should be the key, and "rouge" the value.  On which way or area do you see anything else? That would be an error.

Thanks -yxoc
mueschel (2023-06-06 19:18:00+00:00): There are 3 areas:
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1vNi
yxoc (2023-06-06 19:49:46+00:00): Oups! Thanks, this is fixed now. -yxoc
george1201 (2023-06-04 21:07:37+00:00): Hallo W0lle,
ich habe Bemerkungen zu zwei Wegen deines CS:
1. Weg 331560875 hast du gelöscht. Dieser geht zwischen Lärmschutzwand und Gleisen zu den Kleingärten. Die Kleingärten haben dort Eingangstore. Wie gelangt man jetzt dorthin? Bist du dir sicher, dass kein Kleingartenbesitzer diesen Weg mehr geht?
2. Weg 1178221564 hast du neu angelegt. Dieser führt jetzt mitten durch die Lärmschutzwand. An der Schnittstelle gibt es doch gar keine Tür. Wie überwindet der Begeher des Wegs dieses Hindernis? Kann es sein, dass du deine Informationen aufgrund eines veralteten Luftbilds gewonnen hast? Es gab den Weg vor dem Bau der Lärmschutzwand. Durch die Baumaßnahme ist er aber verschwunden.