piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
stillhart (2026-04-11 14:03:28+00:00): I opened a pandora box with Supercharger naming with huge discussion. 99% of superchargers don't have a name on site. In the tesla community they are called by the location, so York Supercharger. This used to work well, but we have more and more cities with multiple, hence that naming breaks softly. (this seems to be the second in york). Tesla themselves started to acknowledge this and would call many hyperlocal such as Mc Donalds Supercharger, but that made the users angry too, and confused. Now it's that mix with major focus on city, such as York, but additional sub information, such as that outlet.
Further, some in OSM say it should be "Tesla Supercharger" only. Norway they say Tesla Location Supercharger. In Austria they forbid all names since they are seldom written onsite, so name= is illegal for most chargers.

iD allows for "[anything] Supercharger" and suggests "Tesla Supercharger". 

Further, the wiki used to suggested "*Official Name* Supercharger" for 6 years. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station/Tesla_Motors&oldid=2841594
but that has been removed since. 

The Tesla website calls this one "york", which translated to "york supercharger" in OSM. 
https://www.tesla.com/findus/location/supercharger/29390

So for me, if you want to change the name I set to anything else, feel free, I won't mind. I just want the right location and otherwise sane tags so people can find that place to charge their car without relying on one of the 1000 charging apps :-)
Pawcio (2026-05-05 20:40:25+00:00): Do you think that Ladybank and Pitlessie are villages? If so, then the road connecting them should be tertiary according to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Roads_in_the_United_Kingdom, which is also too wide for a country lane
Znaika (2026-03-14 19:17:55+00:00): Hi, warum hast du die Straße so geändert? Sie ist doch in die andere Richtung bananenförmig
rempshaener (2026-03-14 21:47:55+00:00): Hallo,
die Einmündungsgeometrie passte nicht - die Winkel waren viel zu spitz.
Das Dreieck ist nicht beschildert, d.h. das Abbiegen in alle Richtungen ist möglich.
In der vorherigen Version wäre z.B. ein Abbiegen nördlich/westlich kaum möglich - ist es aber tatsächlich
Viele Grüße
aTarom (2026-03-15 07:37:56+00:00): Hola, a parte de que la normativa sigue prohibiendo el paso de bicicletas por senderos estrechos, por las lineas eléctricas imagino que tampoco se puede, aunque ya me espero cualquier cosa
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/178127610/history
NeisBot (2026-03-14 18:06:46+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13648025094 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Dietetyk"
---
Na przykład, bardziej neutralna i obiektywna wersja Twojego tekstu mogłaby brzmieć: "Dietetyk"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-03-22 23:33:04+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/179873182
Higashimado (2026-03-14 19:06:07+00:00): Thank you for your contributions to this under-mapped area 🙂. Please note that, according to the OSM Wiki, `highway=living_street` is typically a legal concept. Since there is no such concept in mainland China, please consider using `highway=residential` or `highway=service` instead.
gurglypipe (2026-03-16 11:33:31+00:00): Hiya, thanks for adding some detail to Cinderbarrow!

Are you sure that things like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/549563143 should be tagged as public_transport=platform? They are a railway platform (railway=platform), but Cinderbarrow isn’t really *public* transport, so I’m not sure that tagging is appropriate? :)
Railwayfan2005 (2026-03-16 16:58:50+00:00): The OSM editor says the tag update is necessary. I think that's what the resolved:outdated_tags:incomplete_tags 2 bit in the change set shows. They might be wrong in this regard but at the moment I just follow their requests.
gurglypipe (2026-03-16 17:15:11+00:00): Indeed, the OSM editor does suggest changing the tags — but it’s only a suggestion. If the tag change could always be applied with certainty then it would have been applied automatically without you having to approve it. Please do check such suggestions in future and only apply them if you’re sure they’re correct (they typically are correct though). It’s fine to leave them if you’re unsure.

I’ve removed the public_transport=platform tags in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179962736

Thanks for the rest of your updates here! :)
PtiBouchon (2026-03-14 18:26:44+00:00): la fromagerie losserand est fermé definitivement

j'ai cliqué sur le franprix par erreur il n'est pas fermé je ne sais pas comment annuler
Aethonatic (2026-03-14 18:43:36+00:00): Please keep your changesets small, you've changed three nodes across three countries.
coatix (2026-03-14 18:45:53+00:00): ok :)
TheIndra (2026-03-14 18:43:49+00:00): Om een of andere reden bestaat het adres Vietplein 3 niet in het BAG dus ik heb het aan de bestaande apotheek node toegevoegd.
eggie (2026-03-14 19:09:52+00:00): Hoi..
Probeer eens op de adresnode bij te taggen svp.
Het adres is incompleet.
Mvg
eggie
camelino (2026-03-15 18:42:04+00:00): Hoi Eggie, als ik in Organic maps een huisnummer aanklik kan ik kiezen voor 'voeg een organisatie toe'. Als ik daarvoor kies moet ik vervolgens alsnog een locatie op de kaart aanwijzen met cursor. Ik kan dus niet bijtaggen lijkt het. Groet, camel
eggie (2026-03-15 18:48:28+00:00): Oke.. dat is dan wel wel app met beperkingen.
Dan zou je later eigenlijk met een reguliere editor als josm of iD kunnen corrigeren.
Gr eggie
eggie (2026-03-15 18:50:06+00:00): Ik zie ook wel mapper winkels e.d. toeviegen met Comaps.
Misschien is dat wat?

https://www.reddit.com/r/fossdroid/comments/1m2ddow/which_is_better_comaps_or_organic_maps/
camelino (2026-03-15 19:11:07+00:00): Dank voor de link. Zojuist geprobeerd maar kent dezelfde beperkingen als Organic maps wat betreft toevoegingen op de kaart.
literan (2026-03-15 09:07:42+00:00): как у вас сразу три деревни в адресе получилось?
Ozon OSM16 (2026-03-15 09:59:49+00:00): Добрый день! Спасибо за уточнение, адреса беру из НСПД (было тройное название через тире), уточняю в ФИАСе (по запросу найдено не было), прописала как было в НСПД, было сомнение, теперь при сомнении буду уточнять
literan (2026-03-15 10:03:34+00:00): ну должен же быть здравый смысл :) В НСПД, ЕГРН полно ошибок и опечаток
Ozon OSM16 (2026-03-15 10:09:48+00:00): Согласна с Вами, но и "странных" адресов полно, буду бдительнее, спасибо, что указали
MassCartog (2026-03-15 00:43:03+00:00): Hi welcome to OSM. Please don't remove valid features, use the tagging system instead. Thanks

Please read this for more info:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won't_delete_roads_on_private_property
MassCartog (2026-03-15 00:43:01+00:00): Hi welcome to OSM. Please don't remove valid features, use the tagging system instead. Thanks

Please read this for more info:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won't_delete_roads_on_private_property
BCNorwich (2026-03-17 08:30:36+00:00): An extensive duplicated highway was removed.
b-jazz (2026-03-16 05:40:31+00:00): Can you please go back and clean up all your fairways. They should not intersect or overlap with the green like you've done many times of the last few changes. Thanks.
bryceco (2026-06-28 03:20:50+00:00): I drew the boundary for the preserve based on the sign at  the entrance that shows the border, and copied your tags over to it. But I didn’t delete your node in case you wanted some of that information preserved at the entrance.
bryceco (2026-06-28 03:21:40+00:00): I think you can delete the fixme at a minimum.
iandees (2026-03-14 20:02:04+00:00): Hi! It looks like a node in this changeset was accidentally moved. This can happen when panning the map. The node has been moved back to its previous position.
sy_ossfin (2026-03-23 14:57:44+00:00): Hey,
danke für deinen Beitrag.

Mit dem changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179873364 hast du in der Nähe bereits einen Spielplatz mit dem Namen erfasst.
Hat sich das gedoppelt? Wenn ja, welcher ist der richtige?
NeisBot (2026-03-14 19:57:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/1029359734 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Hotel Bubo Faralya"
---
Örneğin metnin daha tarafsız ve gerçek bir versiyonu şöyle olabilir: "Hotel Bubo Faralya"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-22 23:33:06+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180276084
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
mueschel (2026-03-22 09:05:20+00:00): Hallo,

"man_made=nest_box" und "nest_box:type" gibt es nicht als Tags. Schau mal im Wiki nach dokumentierten Tags:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dnesting_site
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dbirdhouse
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dbirds_nest

Bei "material" fehlt auch ein Semikolon zwischen den beiden Werten.
Jelbeck (2026-04-09 06:14:03+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. 
Ich habe den Tag auf "man_made=birdhouse" geändert und das Material auf "wood_concrete"
BCNorwich (2026-03-17 08:25:13+00:00): Duplicated highway removed.
felipeeugenio (2026-03-14 20:29:52+00:00): Hola. por favor no usar nombres de fantasía.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179874204
matt_ellery (2026-03-15 19:54:52+00:00): Hi Jarv,

ducks=yes ? (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1159700186)

I don't think that this is useful detail to add. What if I pass that way tomorrow and the ducks weren't in the pond? (Please don't say that ducks=intermittent is the answer) ;-)

Best Regards,
Matt
catgirlseraid (2026-03-16 03:56:50+00:00): Hi,

I have no problems with ducks=yes or ducks=intermittent. There doesn't seem to be an established tag so feel free to make your own as you have done here! Perhaps ducks=intermittent as so kindly suggested by Matt would fit better though.

Thanks,
Phoebe
matt_ellery (2026-03-16 18:57:43+00:00): Hi Peoebe/catgirlseraid,

The problem, as I see it, is where do you draw the line?
I saw some Canada geese in a pond last week, should I tag the pond with geese=yes? 
Pigeons often land on my neighbour's roof, should I add a tag to the roof with pigeons=yes? 
I saw a deer in a field a few days ago, should I add deer=yes to the field?

It doesn't make sense to me.

And I didn't suggest ducks=intermittent. Quite the opposite, in fact.

All the best,
Matt
matt_ellery (2026-03-18 15:37:27+00:00): I cycled past this morning, there were no signs of any ducks. I've removed the tag.

Best Regards,
Matt
felipeeugenio (2026-03-14 20:32:49+00:00): reversado- Ediciones vandálicas
NeisBot (2026-03-14 20:30:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13648304048 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Villa Himeross Faralya"
---
Örneğin metnin daha tarafsız ve gerçek bir versiyonu şöyle olabilir: "Villa Himeross Faralya"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-22 23:33:09+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180276085
(Delete spam tags. First version)
t_ja (2026-03-14 21:05:53+00:00): Ahoj,
osobne nechápem, prečo majú mapperi potrebu napchať tagovanie nejakého POI priamo na budovu. Zbytočne je to neprehľadné, nehovoriac o prípadnom presune POI (hoc len o budovu vedľa). V tomto prípade si síce správne presunul reštauráciu na separátny bod, ale na budove ostalo ešte veľa tagov, ktoré patria reštaurácii (vrátane ref:vatin).

Ponechávam za domácu ulohu prečistiť tagovanie na budove: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/155827628 😉

T.
IvaKraljić (2026-03-16 19:32:23+00:00): The wrong tags for the park have since been removed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179968300. #OptimoRoute
qkaz (2026-03-14 21:21:52+00:00): Hi fdamm,
1. Bitte beachte die Richtlinien für änderungssatz-kommentare: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
2. Das Attribut architect:landscape ist kein geläufiger Tag, welcher zweck wird hier verfolgt?
3. Woher kommt die Information? OSM verfolgt den Grundsatz das jede Info von anderen mappern verifizierbar sein sollte ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Verifiability)
VG qkaz
fdamm (2026-03-17 22:04:04+00:00): Das Attribut architect:landscape ist eine Sonderform vom Attribut architect. Es bezeichnet den entwurfsverfassenden Landschaftsarchitekten. In der Regel sind bei einem Gebäude mit Dachgarten sowohl der Architekt als auch der Landschaftsarchitekt Entwurfsverfasser für den jeweiligen Teil. Wenn beide beim Attribut architect aufgeführt werden, kann der falscher Eindruck entstehen, dass bei für das Gebäude und beide für den Dachgarten verantwortlich sind. Daher das zusätzliche Attribut.
fdamm (2026-03-17 22:05:38+00:00): Im vorletzten Satz fehlt das Wort "beide". 
Er sollte lauten: "Wenn beide beim Attribut architect beide aufgeführt werden, kann der falscher Eindruck entstehen, dass bei für das Gebäude und beide für den Dachgarten verantwortlich sind."
fdamm (2026-03-17 22:07:13+00:00): Es ist spät. Der letzte Kommentar kann gelöscht werden.
Supaplex (2026-03-20 12:09:18+00:00): 已經有回退了
還沒有真得變更施工請勿事先畫上未來建設
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179875659
salatkabel (2026-03-14 21:00:46+00:00): Ich hätte auch Fotos von diesem neuen Fahrradladen, weiß aber nicht, wie ich sie hier hochladen kann.
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-03-15 03:05:21+00:00): Hello, why did you downgrade Summerlin to place=suburb? Summerlin South, which is part of Summerlin (according to the Summerlin website), is outside of the city limits.
Joseph R P (2026-03-16 15:23:16+00:00): Summerlin South is technically separate from Summerlin proper as it is a CDP in unincorporated Clark County, while the original Summerlin development is inside of the Las Vegas city limits. Even if Summerlin encompassed areas outside of the city limits, it should not be tagged as a town as it is not a entirely separate from Las Vegas as an unincorporated community or a separate legal entity.
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-03-16 17:14:42+00:00): Okay, I guess that makes sense. I was thinking of changing Summerlin to be something like place=community since Wikipedia states that "Summerlin is a master-planned community..." instead of calling it a city or town or something else. Would this tagging scheme gain approval from anyone?
Joseph R P (2026-03-16 17:25:09+00:00): The correct tag for any sort of community within a larger community would be neighborhood, quarter, or suburb. "Community" is also a very vague word and thus would not make a good tag in OSM. You could essentially say that it already does exist in the form of most place=* tags, be it a neighborhood, hamlet, village, city, suburb, etc. Also worth noting that Wikipedia descriptions don't match 1:1 with OSMs definitions, and the word "community" is used in the context of Sumnerlin being a master-planned community rather than the word alone being used to indicate what specific type of populated place it is.
rskedgell (2026-03-15 08:00:24+00:00): Thanks for spotting and fixing that, I missed it when I removed the access restrictions from the path.
mikini (2026-03-27 17:33:20+00:00): Hejsa.
Har du været på stedet for nyligt?
Mine redigeringer i [CS 175781292][1] var lavet på baggrund af en runde dernede i december under færdiggørelsen af etape 2 af [omdannelsen til "Byens Bjerg"][2].

Første etape ved friluftscenen blev lavet i foråret 2025 og [indviet d. 8. august 2025][3]. Mens anden etape omkring legepladsen [blev indviet d. 18. januar 2026][4].
Så det der kan ses på GeoDanmark Ortofotos fra foråret 2025 er ikke aktuelt. Bl.a. er indkørslen til musikhusets sceneindgang fra Englandsgade som, du har gentegnet, lukket helt og fjernet, så der nu kun er adgang med bil via den nye indkørsel med bom fra Havnegade.

-- 
Hilsner,
Mikkel

[1]: https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/175781292
[2]: https://www.esbjerg.dk/planer-projekter-og-trafik/byudviklingsprojekter/esbjerg-bypark
[3]: https://jv.dk/esbjerg/velkommen-til-byens-bjerg-denne-dag-indvies-foerste-etape-af-byparkens-store-forvandling
[4]: https://jv.dk/esbjerg/noget-helt-nyt-aabnede-i-byparken-og-folk-dukkede-op-i-hobetal
Lostmonkey (2026-03-27 17:42:37+00:00): Ok. Det skulle jeg have tjekket. Jeg beklager.
Lostmonkey (2026-03-28 15:24:23+00:00): Har forsøgt at tilbageføre (revert) ændringssættet. Så vidt jeg kan se, lykkedes det.
mikini (2026-03-31 15:59:03+00:00): Helt ok, man lader sig nemt rive med, men vi skulle jo helst arbejde i samme retning ;).

Super med reverten, det ser rigtigt ud. Havde ikke lige mulighed for selv at se på det.

Havde også et track på lager af dette stykke, men det er ikke særligt præcist så jeg afventer lige at kunne komme forbi igen før jeg gør mere (mener også nogle stier mod Østre Havnevej er fjernet);
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/mikini/traces/12269163
ivanbranco (2026-05-15 10:38:36+00:00): Hi user_5589,

please do not add values such as "Quercus sp.". The proper tag is "genus=Quercus". More details can be found in this discussion: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/adding-the-type-of-tree-species-genus/96432/8
user_5589 (2026-05-17 12:32:01+00:00): This is valid tagging and yet you removed it. YOU don't like it. That is a VERY different thing from it being invalid tagging.

The International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants is the definitive authority for what is a valid botanical binomial epithet in botany. Therefore unless there is a VERY good reason OSM should follow those rules with tagging. The tags genus and species should conform to what the ICNafp defines as a genus or species for non-hybrid species and genera  and nothogenus or nothospecies for hybrid species and genera.

So first we have recommendation 5A of the Madrid Code: "For purposes of standardization, the following abbreviations are recommended … sp. (species) …."

That establishes the definitive nature of sp. as the general abbreviation of an undefined botanical species.

Then we have article 28 note 2:

"Additional, independent designations for special categories of organisms used in agriculture, forestry, and horticulture (and arising either in nature or cultivation) are dealt with in the International Code of Nomenclature for Cultivated Plants (ICNCP), which defines the cultivar as its basic category (see Pre. 11)."

So that says the ICNCP rules should be used for cultivars.

Then article 28 note 4 and example 1:

"Epithets in names published in conformity with this Code are retained as cultivar epithets, included in single quotation marks, under the rules of the ICNCP when it is considered appropriate to treat the taxon concerned under that Code.

"Ex. 1. Mahonia japonica DC. (Syst. Nat. 2: 22. 1821) may be treated as a cultivar, which is then designated as Mahonia 'Japonica'; Taxus baccata var. variegata Weston (Bot. Univ. 1: 292, 347. 1770), when treated as a cultivar, is designated as Taxus baccata 'Variegata'"

In other words things like Prunus 'Amanogawa' are fine to put in the species tag.

The ICNafp does not define the usage of Genus sp. to show an undefined single species within a genus. However it is very much common practice to use Genus sp. in that way.

For example the title of a report from 2018 on the distribution of oak trees in Great Britain available on the National Environmental Research Council website is: Distribution of Oak trees (Quercus sp.)  in GB and Wales. It doesn't just use the genus name. It uses Genus sp. to refer to undefined species within the genus Quercus.

Guess what I'm going to do? Reverse ALL of your removals in this changeset. See the proper tagging is genus=Quercus AND species=Quercus sp. unless the species is defined.

If someone goes to those trees and changes the generic species tag to a particular species that's fine. If someone, oh I don't know, mass removes species tags in an automated edit that is NOT fine.
Zkir (2026-05-17 13:11:43+00:00): @user_5589,
osm-wiki clearly states that it's a wrong tagging, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:species#Some_rarer_errors

Also, what good does `Genus sp.` makes for you?
eserte (2026-04-15 13:04:08+00:00): Auf den 2025er-Luftbildern ist keine Brücke zu erkennen, auch keine Bauarbeiten. Demnach ist zumindest source:width falsch, width zweifelhaft und highway=construction stimmt ebenfalls nicht.
pwbriggs (2026-03-18 18:15:22+00:00): Looks good, thanks for all the edits!

If you have any questions, https://slack.openstreetmap.us/ is a great resource, or you can leave a message here.

Thanks again and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
iandees (2026-03-14 21:47:51+00:00): Hi! It looks like a node in this changeset was accidentally moved. This can happen when panning the map. The node has been moved back to its previous position.
Langlaeufer (2026-03-15 17:37:29+00:00): Laut dieser Diskussion ist die Brücke bereits fertig
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4932090
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179876549
SammysHP (2026-03-15 17:46:30+00:00): Dieser CS sollte meiner Meinung nach komplett revertiert werden. Wer möchte?
Langlaeufer (2026-03-15 19:30:59+00:00): Halli Chris. Bitte sei nicht schockiert. Deine  Änderung (nach Luftbild?) entspricht nicht mehr der Realität. Die Mapper vor Ort hatten die Situation schon aktualisiert. Von daher soll der Zustand der DB von vorher wieder hergestellt werden. 

@SammyHP. Wenn du weißt wie es geht, mach du den rev. Ich würde mich wegen fehlender Ortskenntnis zurückhalten.
SammysHP (2026-03-15 21:00:07+00:00): @Langlaeufer Kann ich morgen gerne machen.
NeisBot (2026-03-14 21:42:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 7 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/580317304 v13 | 4 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/11884717876 v2
https://osm.org/node/6011432231 v2
https://osm.org/node/5555652204 v3

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179876803
NeisReview (2026-03-22 23:33:10+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/180015401
Grass-snake (2026-03-14 21:50:03+00:00): Здравствуйте, Ваша правка была отменена, так как запрещено копировать из Яндекс карт (кроме панорам).
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A0%D1%83%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%B4%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B2%D0%BE_%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87%D0%BA%D0%B0_1.3.1