piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Anas masuris (2026-01-14 17:27:40+00:00): I'm going to paste that comment there as well

Your "correct" tagging is invalid with given railway=signal scheme (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Dsignal#How_Signal_Tagging_works_by_principle). Look up for eg. DE, PL and AT tagging schemes, to know how to properly develop it.

Plus your edits remove more detailed tagging and is not consistent with D1 regulation of SZDC (I have one in front of me) - the names of semaphores, signals and other things is invalid.

What's not serious is the fact, that you didn't discuss this with other users (eg. detective-fiasco), pushing your tagging scheme. Plus, where is your source? Where is the approval of this mass edit?

Not responding to comments will worsen the situation, I'm certain
HaPe-CZ (2026-01-15 08:07:12+00:00): 1) Old schemas are mostly duplicates of tags; among other things, they allow incorrect descriptions to be assigned to otherwise correctly described signals.
2) On the contrary, the repairs are in accordance with D1. The regulations for Polish railways are different and cannot be confused.
3) Did Detective-fiasko have any description template approved for Czech railways? Without creating any example for Cs, he began copying inappropriate signage from other countries.
4) What lack of response? Have we ever corresponded? You are clearly trying to exert pressure and gain an advantage. What you are writing about mutual communication is a complete lie and untrue. Fiasco probably asked you to defend his mistakes in creating descriptive diagrams.
5) Railway regulations vary from country to country, not all aspects can be directly applied, but correctly filled object tags are sufficient for describing signals and their rendering for ORM; there is no need to invent duplicate descriptions such as "CZ-D1:hlavni_navestidlo" ... This is directly given by the description of the "railway:signal:main" tag, which is standard.
HaPe-CZ (2026-01-15 08:14:05+00:00): @vrabcak. v popisu návěstidla, např. railway:signal:main=Cs-D1:L1 je to bez mzery, ano, ref píšu s mezerou abych lépe viděl které návěstidlo jsem opravil, Pro renderování se dá mezera vypustit (vyjmout). Jistě, pokud to bude nutné, může to být i bez ní.
HaPe-CZ (2026-01-15 09:06:59+00:00): add @Anas ... One more question: who approved and agreed to the description of signals based on the "fiasco" model? My method was and is to first create a diagram and then use it consistently. Fiasco did not do this, he just started creating descriptions. As you write, your words... not agreed upon.
HaPe-CZ (2026-01-15 09:53:09+00:00): Add 2, @Anas... why haven't you answered yet? You claim above that I don't want to communicate, but you remain silent and don't answer!!!

Add 3, @Anas... do you have the SZDC-D1 regulation in front of you on your desk? And do you understand it? Probably not. It's just your empty and manipulative phrase. If you understand it, you should have answered in Czech. If you can read Czech regulations, you must know Czech, otherwise you have again stated something untrue and it is fraud.
vrabcak (2026-01-15 12:29:58+00:00): @HaPe-CZ  Please stop with personal attacks, it won't take us anywhere. 

Since there is an obvious community disagreement about the tagging scheme and strong interest in mapping CZ signals, please resolve the issues through the discussion before rewriting others person work. Otherwise it may be viewed as vandalism.
I believe our common goal is to make perfect railway map and it would be a pity to ruin it in petty edit wars. 

@Anas%20masuris Thank you for joining the discussion. I see your points valid. You are  very welcome to join the discussion on the tagging  sheme. Personally, I find the discussion on Wiki talk pages a little bit inconvenient , so I suggest to move somewhere else - perharps OSM Forum? However, I'm perfectly fine to continue on the wiki if you prefer.
detective-fiasco (2026-01-15 14:35:47+00:00): Add @HaPe-CZ: One more question: who approved and agreed to the description of signals based on the "fiasco" model? 

Precisely. Neither model was aproved. Therefore neither model is more correct. So the retagging is uncalled for.
HaPe-CZ (2026-01-15 15:41:46+00:00): @vrabcak: User Anas initiated the personal attack with false accusations that I am not communicating. Will you send him a warning as well? On the contrary, Anas still hasn't answered some questions.

@fiasko I spent over a year creating the description on the wiki, no one had any objections, and you had plenty of time to submit suggestions. As I expected, you settle scores through third parties (Anas).
detective-fiasco (2026-01-15 15:54:54+00:00): @HaPe-CZ Yes, I have been inactive on the wiki. Because I was not aware of your progress on the documentation.

Yet, when I found out about it and sent you possible weakpoints and suggestions, you were unaccomodating. Instead you started this mass retagging.
HaPe-CZ (2026-01-15 17:02:35+00:00): @fiasco: What you write is simply untrue. There are many of my answers and explanations on the wiki discussion page. On the contrary, your unwillingness and attitude of repeating the same questions, your misunderstanding of the structure of signals, and your lack of cooperation have led to this situation. You seem to have forgotten that I corrected some things based on your comments and those of vrabcak. The fact that I did not correct everything offended you, in your opinion. In specific cases, I acknowledged my mistake or error and corrected it. You are unable to do so, like a small child.
Anas masuris (2026-01-15 18:02:02+00:00): Um, maybe you have forgotten, but some people have a job and are working in the middle of the day, thus are unable to comment at every minute.

Back to the topic - as an experienced editor of railway-related stuff and one of the implementors and contributors to the tagging schemes and ORM project, I clearly see that your proposed scheme is invalid with the standard of railway=signal. It's weird that you didn't read it and still decided to force-push your proposal - did you even read how other country-specific tagging looks like? It seems not - PL, DE, AT, CZ and SK is very similar in the railway signal structure (The AT has descriptive, non-standardized in codes signalling, the same as CZ). You would have also known that according to D1 regulation, the class/group name of semaphores (entry/exit/intermediate) is hlavni navestidlo (not the ref) (AT uses AT-V2:hauptsignal for example, which literally stands for "main signal") - this is just an example of your invalid tagging scheme. Your "correction" in that case can be considered a vandalism, since you forced your scheme without any public discussion - unless you provide a link to discussion on forum

When it comes to "personal attacks" and "false accusations" - dude, you have assumed that I was asked by detective-fiasco to attack you XD Wow, what a hypocrisy - also speaking about lack of cooperation, while force-pushing. I, on my own, have noticed non-rendered signals in ORM (Lichkov to be exact), inspected and commented your edit.

Saying I must comment in Czech, because a document is in Czech... senseless XD. FYI I read full PL, DE, AT, SK and CZ regulations regarding the signalling. It's sad you haven't touched the railway=signal wiki page...
detective-fiasco (2026-01-16 01:43:58+00:00): Discussion now also ongoing here:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:railway
HaPe-CZ (2026-01-16 08:32:14+00:00): @Anas ... Your response expresses nothing but arrogance and unwillingness to accept other, and above all better, solutions. You have been living with the old system for a long time, and accepting a new or better method would mean admitting you were wrong. You are clearly incapable of doing that. And one more thing... what a coincidence, you happened to notice something? That's a lame excuse. You were warned to join the majority, unfortunately the one that is incapable of modernization and active change.
I don't care if they have it described differently or the same way in DE, PL, AT, those are their railways.
Have you really read all the traffic regulations of the neighboring states you mention? And have you understood them? That's really surprising, because it takes a lot of time, but you wrote that you can't answer because you have to work.
detective-fiasco (2026-01-16 09:42:51+00:00): @HaPe-CZ are you planning on replying to the arguments I've added to the wiki and which you've just deleted?
Anas masuris (2026-01-16 09:44:19+00:00): As far as I know, your tagging scheme wasn’t accepted and described as better by anyone in public discussion or forum, so your system cannot be descibed as better. And it seems you did not communicate with others about your scheme, so my argument stands. No link to forum or public discussion about your scheme was presented here.

Well, you may not believe it, but I often look at ORM map and make edits in different places when I notice something - you can see it in my history of edits and notes. As you state your hypothesis, you must present some proof - without that, saying I was asked to join the discussion and „attack” you is a defamation. Still you haven’t given the proof of alleged warning of „joining the majority”

I gave you the documented instruction/standard, how to properly develop a tagging scheme for country-specific tagging and gave you the examples of systems being still in use and widely accepted. Despite differences in railway regulations, those systems have been successfully transcripted into ORM scheme. That should have been considered a guideline of how it should be done and adapted to CZ (this is a country code, not a language code) case. Ignoring wiki pages makes your situation worse. I have been making railway signalling edits for over 2 years and in that time I read neighbouring country regulations, so stop undermining my knowlegde of those documents

I will have your edits reported to moderation as you show no cooperation, erasing without discussion other people’s work without any basis or source and insinuated planned, personal attack on you. @vrabcak, @detective-fiasco are you willing to inform about this situation on CZ forum and moderation?
detective-fiasco (2026-01-16 10:05:58+00:00): For the record, the retaging happened in the following changesets.

* https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/176832964

* https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/177133566

* All @HaPe-CZ's changesets between https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/177166125 and https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/177249774 (which is as of now his most recent chageset)

@Anas_masuris If by Czech forum you mean the czech mailing list, I should be able to do that (sometime today).
detective-fiasco (2026-01-16 10:19:51+00:00): Or perhaps @vrabcak knows a better way to notify the community?
vrabcak (2026-01-16 10:34:15+00:00): @detective-fiasco Mailing list [talk-cz](https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz) is the proper place to do it. 
Less-formal discussion can be done also on matrix/discord/telegram channel (see instructions for joining on https://openstreetmap.cz/komunita)
HaPe-CZ (2026-01-16 10:53:35+00:00): @fiasco ... Who said you should add, rewrite, or correct anything? In your arrogance, you rewrote parts of the text to suit your opinion.
HaPe-CZ (2026-01-16 10:59:52+00:00): @Anas ... Sure, you can report it. As for the discussion, you yourself are shutting it down with various excuses and attacks. You claim that you are the best and that you know everything. Can you prove it somehow? Is there any discussion about your primacy? You see, it's exactly the same. You yourself are committing similar attacks by placing yourself above others, thereby claiming that others are stupid and only you are smart. If you are talking about a discussion of my proposal, where is the discussion about editing methods from fiasco? Hmm????
HaPe-CZ (2026-01-16 11:04:24+00:00): @ALL Yes, the best way to get rid of opposition is to eliminate it. This is the classic method of autocratic rule in practice, where weak individuals feel strong under the wing of their ruler.
HaPe-CZ (2026-01-16 11:07:48+00:00): add ... Or at least rewrite a critical article about mistakes and shortcomings on Wiki pages in a way that suits the other side.
detective-fiasco (2026-01-16 11:44:54+00:00): I didn"t change any of your text. I added counter arguments and explanations at the end of each chapter.
detective-fiasco (2026-01-16 11:49:34+00:00): I have the same question do you @HaPe-CZ : 

You claim that you are the best and that you know everything. Can you prove it somehow? 

Other than your asumption that noone else in this discussion has done the "kurz strojvedoucího".
HaPe-CZ (2026-01-16 12:22:31+00:00): @fiascoi ... Anas is the main one who claims to be the best, and the others agree with him, according to a Czech proverb.
lamms (2026-02-01 18:56:50+00:00): Was removing the bridge tags from the bridges themselves intentional? it seems to have created some issues with the paths that run under them. See https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/issue/8f4a58cb-6a46-f1f3-4d43-62a6da848a6f and https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/issue/4cdb755c-310c-f72a-3228-9406a325cfb0 for example
lamms (2026-02-01 19:06:45+00:00): Per the wiki on man_made=bridge I've added the bridge tags back to the ways :)
eggie (2026-01-13 09:08:15+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
hatul (2026-01-13 16:21:12+00:00): בבקשה לא להוסיף חסימות סתם
eggie (2026-01-13 08:48:20+00:00): Dag von wolkenstein.. Benieuw hoe je dit hebt gedaan... Wanneer je met editor iD routerelaties bewerkt gaan ze in de regel stuk.

Hier klopt het overigens nog.
Beter editor JOSM gebruiken als je routerelaties bewerkt.
editor josm stap voor stap
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/editor-josm-stap-voor-stap/75047


MVG
eggie
Tomas Straupis (2026-01-13 12:36:31+00:00): Laba diena. Peržiūrėjau pakeitimą. Iš principo gerai, tik kelios pastabos. Šaltinis tai paprastai taškas, nes negali būti, kad ten toookio dydžio tas šaltinėlis :-) Ir pavadinimas turi būti ne bendrinis, t.y. prie mokyklos nerašom pavadinimo „Mokykla“, o tarkim „Petro Kurmelio vidurinė mokykla“. Tai ir prie šaltinio reikia oficialaus pavadinimo, jei toks yra. Analogiškai tvenkinys piečiau, ar tikrai jo pavadinimas yra „Molynas“? Jei vietiniai taip vadina, to neužtenka, kad į žemėlapį tokį pavadinimą dėtume :-)
borishag (2026-01-15 08:54:14+00:00): ICI PARIS XL;  Hallo, Je hebt de originele BAG node 2785843310 met de daarbij horende essentiele informatie verwijderd. Kan je deze terugzetten in de node die door jou gemaakt is?
SJ30Y (2026-01-15 10:39:56+00:00): Hallo, de informatie is toegevoegd!
IvanaŠokčević (2026-02-19 12:40:01+00:00): Added required source:hgv tag, fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178006374 #OptimoRoute
Taya_S (2026-03-03 10:40:37+00:00): Deleted bus stop placed at north pole

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179294986
NeisBot (2026-01-17 15:30:47+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13452136472 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Math tutoring center"

#MapWithoutSpam
Norbert Dichter (2026-01-13 11:02:12+00:00): Hello, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. Thank you for your contribution. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. Or just hit the Q-key.
Also please keep in mind: many buildings are very close but do not actually touch each other, try to map them close to each other without letting them connect or share nodes with each other, roads, or residential area outlines. In the iD web editor, holding down the "alt" key will keep nodes from "snapping" to each other and accidentally connecting.  Thanks so much for your contribution, Norbert 'Nodi' Dichter, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177170912
Norbert Dichter (2026-01-13 11:02:38+00:00): Please map individual buildings without collecting multiple nearby buildings into a single object. Please accurately outline all buildings. Buildings should be mapped without snapping their corners to other buildings and features such as roads and paths. Buildings should have their corners squared. Check the task instructions for the full requirements.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177170912
NeisBot (2026-01-17 15:30:48+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/10785966103 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Aveda Lifestyle Salon in Clermont"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-25 07:45:07+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177671260
(No visible changes after review)
woodpeck_repair (2026-01-13 09:54:37+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 176905985, 177028808, 177028924, 177028957, 177029082, 177029234, 177029269, 177029284, 177029487.
Bienson (2026-01-14 00:38:33+00:00): Hallo,

Beim korrekten Eintragen von Ampelübergängen sollte highway=traffic_signals getrennt von dem highway=crossing-Node erfasst werden. highway=traffic_signals an der Haltelinie der Autos, highway=crossing + crossing=traffic_signals am Kreuzungspunkt vom Fußgängerüberweg und Straße.

Siehe z.B. Kreuzung um https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/930410028/
eggie (2026-01-13 10:50:00+00:00): review_requested 	yes

Dag Doru,

Het lijkt me correct.
MVG
eggie
A67-A67 (2026-01-13 18:05:18+00:00): De openingstijden Mo-Fr 09:00-18:00 komen totaal niet overeen met wat op de website van de winkel staat: https://www.intertoys.nl/winkel-zoeken/speelgoedwinkel-alphen-aan-den-rijn/rijnplein
Dimitar155 (2026-01-13 10:46:15+00:00): Училището е отбелязано веднъж върху площта около сградата. В момента излиза че има две училища тук...

И StreetComplete ще те пита как се казва "новото" училище и какъв е вида на сградата пак.
Anonymous36863 (2026-01-13 11:17:36+00:00): ok
Bienson (2026-01-14 00:41:06+00:00): Bitte am besten als disused:shop=* stehen lassen, damit StreetComplete in Zukunft nach der Nachfolge fragt.
Außer z..B. wenn das Ladenlokal nicht mehr existiert.
IvanaŠokčević (2026-02-05 09:37:39+00:00): Removed hgv designated tag because it was tagged based on DMAMPO map; fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177561398
Zrop (2026-01-13 13:23:17+00:00): Hallo  stadt-koeln-tillmann,
wieso wurde die Straße hier in Christoph-Musmacher-Straße geändert ? Vor Ort ist sie mit Max-Pester-Straße ausgeschildert.

Gruß
Zrop
stadt-koeln-tillmann (2026-01-14 08:00:57+00:00): Hallo Zrop,
laut Historie, Straßenbenennungsakte und Zuordnung der Flurstücke in ALKIS ist die Zugehörigkeit des Querverbindungswegs zu Max-Musmacher-Straße richtig. Offenbar ist das Straßenschild falsch und die nominative Kraft des Faktischen hat dafür gesorgt, dass der Fehler sich durchgezogen hat. Alte Straßenbenennungsakten sind eingescannte Papierakten, die Definition ist hier oft nicht eindeutig und schwierig zu interpretieren. Wir bemühen uns hier immer solche Unklarheiten richtig zu stellen, das wird dann mit mehreren relevanten Stellen in der Verwaltung diskutiert. Das aktuelle Verfahren für Straßenbenennungen ist da eindeutig und flurstücksgenau. Das Straßenschild soll entfernt oder geändert werden. 
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Im Auftrag
Robert Tillmann
Stadt Köln - Der Oberbürgermeister
Amt für Liegenschaften, Vermessung und Kataster
Stadtplan und thematische Karten 
Willy-Brandt-Platz 2 
50679 Köln 
Telefon: 0221/221-23947
E-Mail:   robert.tillmann@stadt-koeln.de
Internet: stadt.koeln
Folgen Sie uns!
www.instagram.com/stadt.koeln 
www.youtube.com/user/Koeln 
www.facebook.com/stadt.koeln50
https://social.cologne/@koeln
Zrop (2026-01-14 21:12:26+00:00): Hallo stadt-koeln-tillmann,
das mag ja alles stimmen, aber OSM bildet die vor Ort überprüfbaren Eigenschaften (on the ground) ab. Und vor Ort steht "Max-Pester-Straße", daher sollte der Name auch so lange bleiben bis das Schild dann ausgetauscht wird.

Gruß
Zrop
gscholz (2026-01-14 08:21:03+00:00): Hi M GM,
this changeset has damaged the boundary relation of "Marseille-10":

tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=2.04759&lat=48.92522&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=177172998

I have just fixed this:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4559512/history#map=14/43.27229/5.39884

I f you like to edit relations, I strongly recommend to use JOSM instead of ID to avoid such errors.
Kind regards
Guido
smeòrach (2026-05-10 21:26:25+00:00): Dè 'n tùs a chleachd thu airson crìochan nan sgìrean seo, 's carson a tha crìochan Mhòinteach Leòdhais a' buntainn orra? Tha crìochan nan Community Councils ri fhaotainn ann an open source, nì iad an gnothaich.
jSeke (2026-05-11 15:55:43+00:00): tha mi duilich, smaoinich mi air sgàth 's gu bheil na sgìrean nan dòigh neo-oifigeil airson na bailtean a bhuidhneachadh agus nach eil bailtean sam bith anns a' Mhòinteach gum biodh sin na deagh chrìoch. Ach 's lèir nach eil deagh thuigse agam air amas OSM 's nach eil mi air rud sam bith a chuideachadh so nuair a tha am pròiseact agam andràst le aibhnichean ullamh, stadaidh mi am mapa a dheasachadh
eggie (2026-01-13 10:47:50+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  De info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
IvanaŠokčević (2026-02-05 09:38:06+00:00): Removed hgv designated tag because it was tagged based on DMAMPO map; fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177561828
NeisBot (2026-01-17 15:30:51+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/1557554553 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Felix medical clinic"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-25 07:45:08+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177671261
(Only the affected tags were deleted; other unrelated data was left untouched)