piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2026-02-07 15:57:53+00:00): Сибирского тракта нет много лет. Добавлять его не нужно.  
  
    > Если на безымянные дороги нельзя добавлять название «Сибирский тракт», то такие и подобные им названия тоже надо убирать?  
  
Если вы были на местности и подтвердили, что у дороги нет названия, то название можно удалить (или перенести в другой тег).  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Проверяемость
Дымков Артём Денисович (2026-02-07 16:05:00+00:00): «Добавлять его не нужно». Имеется в виду не нужно добавлять название? В отношение включить можно? А названия типа «Участок Сибирского тракта от ... до ...» и подобные куда девать?
mavl (2026-02-07 16:16:48+00:00):     > В отношение включить можно?   
  
OSM - карта текущего состояния местности. Сибирский тракт не существует, значит не нужно отношение для него. И не нужны названия дорог, которые уже не существуют. Если какие-либо участки Сибирского тракта будут восстановлены (идеи такие у региональных властей есть) и обозначены на местности, то Сибирский тракт можно будет добавить.    
  
"Map what's on the ground"  
"Don't map historic events and historic features"  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice  
  
    > А названия типа «Участок Сибирского тракта от ... до ...» и подобные куда девать?  
  
Это не название, это описание (тег description).  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:description  
  
Эти описания не всегда верны. Бывает, что участок Сибирского тракта уже зарос и не прослеживается на местности, а в OSM к Сибирскому тракту отнесена новая дорога, которая появилась поблизости.
Дымков Артём Денисович (2026-02-07 16:28:37+00:00): «Сибирский тракт не существует, значит не нужно отношение для него». То есть отношение вообще надо удалить?
mavl (2026-02-07 16:33:10+00:00): Да. Удалить. Эта информация не подходит для OSM. Она подходит для OpenHistoricalMap.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:OpenHistoricalMap
Дымков Артём Денисович (2026-02-07 19:43:12+00:00): «Бывает, что участок Сибирского тракта уже зарос и не прослеживается на местности». А если он не до конца зарос и всё ещё прослеживается? Считаю, что изменение состояния объекта ещё не означает, что его не существует.  Занимаюсь велотуризмом много лет, проехал тысячи километров по разным странам, в том числе по России. В этом году проехал именно этот маршрут. По итогам этой поездки была проверена и подтверждена сохранность этого маршрута в каком-либо виде. Абсолютное большинство участков всё ещё прослеживается. Считаю, что принадлежность той или иной существующей на местности дороги (любой степени сохранности) к этому маршруту будет весьма полезна для OSM. Совсем несохранившиеся участки конечно же наносить не собираюсь и не планировал
Frans S (2026-02-28 10:16:52+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
A few remarks:
This is a 'building' only project. Please stick to that.
When you want to map highways, Use the  tags as described in this wiki

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Indonesian_Tagging_Guidelines#Roads

Footway is not an accepted tag.
Instead of it, use ' path '(generic, to be used by Pedestrians, cyclists and motorcycles

Don't let a road connect to other features as well, like a wood area.

It makes no sense to map landuse areas which continue on adjacent tasks.
TM4, a task-limited program, is not suited to map landuse areas. These must be mapped in separate projects or directly in OSM.
When a building/settlement is within the view area of a road (<100 mtr) , there is no need to map that short road.

I adjust your mappings.
Best regards, and keep mapping
rant-better (2026-02-06 03:00:57+00:00): Thanks for cleaning this up. I was unsure how the two Welcome to Brunswick venues were connected.
SomeoneElse (2026-02-05 10:59:56+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM!
Just to let you know, there's a bit of a bg in the iD editor where it doesn't warn you if gaps appear in boundary relations like for example Iveruss https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6445228 here.  I fixed that in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178134053 .
If you click on something in the iD editor (like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1474379891 here) and scroll down at the left-hand side you can see a bit of information about what it is a member of, and if you hover the mouse over the blue bit for each it highlights them at the right (well, ish - there are some bugs in that too).
Best Regards,
Andy
felipeeugenio (2026-02-05 21:08:52+00:00): Hola. EL Loteo se llama Loteo Pilauco Schwalm. Vemos que hace 4 años incluso lo borró.
Aparece incluso en el INE. Se trata de un error?
saludos
Dos Lomas (2026-02-05 23:44:27+00:00): Hola, Felipe.
Si, el nombre es Pilauco Schwalm, por eso borré el nombre Enrique Schwalm,  y habría que dejar en vez de este nombre propio el de "Loteo Pilauco Schwalm", o simplemente "Pilauco Schwalm" gracias.
felipeeugenio (2026-02-06 15:12:53+00:00): Vale, gracias. Lo corregimos. Saludos
Hong Yao (2026-02-05 03:29:47+00:00): Stop deleting
NeisBot (2026-02-05 01:06:11+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your changesets and noticed that the cumulative count of your recent edits (4 changesets) shows that 302 of your last 317 changes were deletions. This is quite an unusual proportion, so I wanted to check with you.

Could you please confirm whether these deletions were intentional or if they may have occurred by mistake?

#DeletionsCheck #Cumulative
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?uid=8699345
onlinewebstore (2026-02-05 01:13:09+00:00): intentional

This was old and inaccurate information on the map that needs to be updated.
onlinewebstore (2026-02-05 01:13:33+00:00): Thank you!
Fraxi (2026-02-05 08:08:33+00:00): Hello!
I saw you deleted several buildings that might not exist at this moment.  But if they still appear on satellite images, it's better to use prefix "demolished" in front of "building". See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:demolished:* for more. The most recent imagery photos for this bounding box might be since 2022, but there is a probability for some mapper to re-add them. You also deleted a track, but left https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/160244719/. If it still exist, it should be connected to any way. I'd connect to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/141245157/.
onlinewebstore (2026-02-05 08:17:46+00:00): The buildings are unused and have had collapsed roofs and walls for many years.
In practice, this area is uninhabitable.
Fraxi (2026-02-05 08:19:39+00:00): I made some changes. If https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/160244719/ really is not passing behind the building at the moment, you could remove it or add "was:" prefix in front of "highway". Same for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1474341371. Because the last one still appears on satellite images. But it should be connected to any road.
Fraxi (2026-02-05 08:22:11+00:00): If the buildings are unused, but there are any ruins in the reality, you may use ruins:*=* or abandoned:*=* See more on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
Fraxi (2026-02-05 08:58:36+00:00): Are you sure for this change? You've deleted the cemetary. For example, in Vratsa, there is cemetery, called "Старите гробища", but it's still in use.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178117166
hoserab (2026-02-10 22:06:25+00:00): Hello Jenny,

I presume you are a GEOG 588 student at the UofC? FYI you changed a house and a bus stop to 'parks', and dragged the bus stop about three blocks out of place. Please be mindful of what you're doing; your changes are not just 'tests', they're being saved and uploaded to the OSM database. Gibberish like this has to be cleaned up afterward, which no one appreciates having to do...

Thanks
Glassman (2026-02-05 21:08:57+00:00): Nice. One suggestion, square bldgs by selecting the outlline and then type a "q"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178118466
Glassman (2026-02-05 21:10:20+00:00): #TIP: Don't add any personal information to OSM. While this one is not a big deal, we do try to discourage leaving any personal information.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178118546
istrait (2026-02-05 22:12:53+00:00): Thank you for letting me know.
TheSwavu (2026-02-05 10:50:58+00:00): Hello,

Thank you for your edit. 

This isn't 500 Wellington St. Did you mean that WAAPA has moved to here https://osm.org/go/swxoXwwYv?layers=N ?

Thanks.
mistermapmaker123 (2026-02-05 11:44:36+00:00): hi. no, WAAPA has moved to the new Edith Cowan University City campus at 500 Wellington Street in Perth. The campus opened on February the 2nd of this year. Unfortunately, the satellite imagery has not been updated to show the completed campus.
mistermapmaker123 (2026-02-05 11:45:10+00:00): If the imagery was updated, i would create the new campus. Also, the Edith Cowan University Mount Lawley is now closed.
Xvtn (2026-02-05 15:37:41+00:00): Hi Dogman15, next time would you please consider splitting up your changeset into either geographical area or change type? It makes it much easier for others to review your work. Regardless, thanks for your contributions!
Dogman15 (2026-02-11 09:42:19+00:00): If I remember correctly, this was mainly just a bunch of tag errors that anyone could have checked and fixed. Honestly, some of the "outdated tags" should just get automatically fixed by the system, such as unmarked crossings.
hoserab (2026-02-06 17:45:11+00:00): Hello Ava,

Once again, for the same reasons as elaborated on in the comments on your earlier changeset (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178074250) I have reverted almost all of the changes you have made in the past couple days. You are added overlapping road segments, sidewalks, and building areas, which is not only completely unnecessary but something that we as mappers should actively not do.

I am also going to send you a direct message, to bring to your attention that I've been trying to reach out in these changeset comments. In the iD editor you're using on osm.org, you should see a notification in the top right corner of your screen next to your user name. Please read it.

Thanks
KennyDap (2026-02-05 04:21:44+00:00): This change, while beneficial, also contains many errors and broken roads.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178120029
ChrissW-R1 (2026-02-06 19:35:21+00:00): Please check https://osm.org/note/5157569
hoserab (2026-02-10 18:24:57+00:00): The subject errant highway=residential has been deleted by another mapper already, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178252222.
arjunaraoc (2026-02-17 00:23:30+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check my update https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178653624#map=19/18.882258/84.582766
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178119246
Udarian (2026-02-05 04:13:26+00:00): some of these changes are incorrect as the imagery used is a bit out of date in the area, it is the latest available in iD but somewhat out of date. There is somewhat newer imagery in the area from the county that can be used in iD using the following custom imagery link: https://imageserverintra.miamidade.gov/arcgis/rest/services/Woolpert2025/ImageServer/exportImage?f=image&bbox={bbox}&bboxSR={wkid}&imageSR={wkid}&size={width},{height}+

There is the fact that the contributor that added several of these construction areas seems to be a local to the area.

Happy Mapping,
Udar.
SurfBalBay News (2026-02-06 16:59:22+00:00): Reverted your changes as it used an outdated satellite imagery. I'm a local to Bay Harbor Islands and pass by the sites with construction ongoing.
f_gonella (2026-02-05 06:24:53+00:00): Hi, is this some kind of automated edit gone wrong? Way 1473951808 seems legit, but node 1473951808 is on the other side of the planet barrier=gate on a waterway makes no sense. Please check and revert.
Udarian (2026-02-05 05:01:26+00:00): I have asked you this before, please when you add a feature don't just add a name and a housenumber, at minimum add the type of business (amenity=* etc) and the street name of the address if you are going to add address info. for OSM POI's to be truly useful they need at least a tag telling what they are. I have tagged it as a gym with sport=boxing, if that is incorrect feel free to fix it, also what street is this POI on as I didn't think I would correctly guess that based of of the provided information.

Happy Mapping,
Udar.
i2004 (2026-02-05 15:49:07+00:00): ahi agrege hipodromo de san isidro en el ramal 437 garin sentido a acasusso para diferenciar del ramal boulogne que no pasa por el hipodromo
felipeeugenio (2026-02-05 12:39:17+00:00): Hola. Por favor dibujar la base del edificio. Está agregando como longitud la altura. Fijarse bien en las fotos. gracias.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178121119
BCNorwich (2026-02-06 07:44:13+00:00): Duplicated highway removed.
NeisBot (2026-02-05 06:13:44+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 18 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/17335791 v27 | 9 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/12598472567 v2
https://osm.org/node/12598472568 v2
https://osm.org/node/12598472556 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178122489
pitscheplatsch (2026-02-05 08:53:07+00:00): I think the following created relation may has introduced some issues: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20173719

Best regards,
Pascal
NeisBot (2026-02-05 06:26:10+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your changesets and noticed that the cumulative count of your recent edits (3 changesets) shows that 368 of your last 398 changes were deletions. This is quite an unusual proportion, so I wanted to check with you.

Could you please confirm whether these deletions were intentional or if they may have occurred by mistake?

#DeletionsCheck #Cumulative
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?uid=23631740
NeisBot (2026-02-06 05:59:04+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13525604330 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "HVAC company"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-02-15 05:32:59+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/178384714
muralito (2026-02-05 20:07:58+00:00): Hola. Solo se mapean elementos como son en la realidad. Esto no es un hospital. es una oficina comercial.
TV256 (2026-02-05 23:02:48+00:00): Hola muralito. Muchas gracias por tu comentario. No encontraba una mejor categoría y me basé en otros mapas para elegirla. Ya mismo averiguo cómo cambiarlo.
catgirlseraid (2026-02-17 21:47:58+00:00): can you please add changeset comments in the future? thanks!
Patr1k_P (2026-02-08 08:16:39+00:00): zdravim, na zaklade coho ste to zmenili a navyse aj chybne
Milos Kotora (2026-02-09 06:48:02+00:00): Lebo som tam byval do svojich 18 rokov, dodnes tam byva svagor a moja matka... skontrolujte si to podla katastra nehnutelnosti SR https://zbgis.skgeodesy.sk/mapka/sk/kataster/detail/kataster/parcela-c/827860/4906_66?pos=48.316139,18.519025,20
NeisBot (2026-02-06 05:55:30+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 10 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/805831512 v4 | 10 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/2039472316 v2
https://osm.org/node/2039472318 v2
https://osm.org/node/2039472320 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178124254
bartgron (2026-02-13 18:43:24+00:00): Zestaw zmian jest nieprawidłowy i został wycofany:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178517519
Pozdrawiam
KennyDap (2026-02-05 09:43:32+00:00): Removal of military objects is vandalism and cannot be a reason for removing the object.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178130678
DD1GJ (2026-02-05 08:12:41+00:00): Hallo friedermausi,

danke für die Information, aber Du hattest das gesamte Gebäude gelöscht. Ich habe die Löschung Rückgängig gemacht und nur die Tags der Gaststätte entfernt, bzw. nach dem Lebenszyklus gekennzeichnet.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/180537607

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lebenszyklus-Pr%C3%A4fix

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Viele Grüße, Joachim
Tomas Straupis (2026-02-06 07:08:42+00:00): Laba diena. Jei piktybiškai OSM bus bandoma naudoti kaip reklaminė erdvė, tai mes išvis išimsim visą informaciją lauk.
Keliaratis (2026-02-06 07:39:03+00:00): Laba diena,

kodėl jūs nusprendėte, kad OSM piktybiškai  (žinoma, kiekvienas apie kitus sprendžia pagal savo sugedimo lygį) naudojama kaip reklaminė erdvė. Ką būtent turite galvoje reklamą? Ar, kad prie pavadinimo KELIARATIS nurodyta, kad tai dviračių ir paspirtukų servisas, ar kažką kitą? Būtų malonu, jeigu konkretizuotumėte, kad tai pataisyčiau ir nekiltų dėl to jokių nesusipratimų.

Ačiū
Tomas Straupis (2026-02-06 09:05:45+00:00): Pavadinimas yra pavadinimas, o ne pavadinimas + aprašymas. Aprašymas yra description tage. Taipogi nereikia VIENO realybės objekto kurti du kartus, kaip taško ir kaip pastato. Taipogi šitas pastatas neturi adreso pagal oficialius duomenis, prie dviračių objekto yra pridėtas kontaktinis adresas. Dabar yra viskas pataisyta, nereikia nieko keisti.
Keliaratis (2026-02-06 09:18:48+00:00): Ok. Pageidavimas arba pasiūlymas-būtų šaunu jeigu egzistuotų atskira kategorija kaip dviračių ir (ar) paspirtukų taisykla (ar remontas). Dviračių parduotuvių tikrai ženkliai mažiau nei remonto dirbtuvių ir ne kiekviena taisykla yra parduotuvė. Tai būtų objektyvesnė info vartotojui.
Tomas Straupis (2026-02-06 09:35:03+00:00): Gal taip, o gal ir ne :-) Beveik visose dviračių parduotuvėse teikiamos ir remonto paslaugos, tai pridėjus papildomą kategoriją shop=bicycle_repair tokie potencialiai pasimestų ir išvis niekur nepatektų... Pagal OSM struktūrą galima dėti kokią tik nori žymą, kad ir shop=bicycle_repair, bet ji žemėlapiuose atsirastų (ir realiai būtų naudojama) tik tada, kai tokių taškų visam pasaulyje atsirastų daug. O kol taip nėra...
Sylabowy Kot (2026-02-05 16:16:50+00:00): Aktualizacja czego? Każda wgrywana zmiana coś aktualizuje. Dokonałeś zmiany na większość miasta, więc wypada to jakoś dokładniej opisać: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Komentarze_zestawu_zmian
Marek-M (2026-02-05 16:48:11+00:00): Przystanki błędnie zmieniłeś - dodałeś `public_transport=platform` do krawężników a już taki tag mają węzły przy tych przystankach. Jest to niepoprawne zdublowanie obiektów. Wycofuję tą część zmiany.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178148958
micheleOSM3 (2026-02-10 18:20:50+00:00): Ciao, hai fatto alcuni errori:
1) Hai messo un nome descrittivo in una way
2) Hai rotto una relation

Adesso metto a posto.
Ti consiglierei di leggere questa ottima pagina iniziale:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Hiking
micheleOSM3 (2026-02-10 18:22:54+00:00): Ho effettuato il revert perché il changeset ha introdotto almeno 2 errori

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178373335
muralito (2026-02-05 20:10:46+00:00): Hola. Este otro elemento tampoco es un hospital. No me queda claro si es una residencia o que... pero definitivamente no es un amenity=hospital en el concepto de OSM.
TV256 (2026-02-05 23:11:59+00:00): Hola muralito. Revisando el concepto en OSM creo que calza perfectamente en el mismo. Es un hospital psiquiátrico donde se brinda tratamiento, aunque es cierto que cumple con varias características de residencia... Quedo atento a tus comentarios, gracias!
muralito (2026-02-05 23:46:59+00:00): Para mi seria al reves, no lo conozco, pero por lo que describe en su pagina web se describe con:
amenity=social_facility
social_facility=group_home
social_facility:for=mental_health;disabled

Al principio tu respuesta me genero dudas, pero para mi con el equipo que tiene (ver https://centroklinos.com.uy/nosotros/) y los servicios que ofrece no seria amenity=hospital  
Tampoco puede ser amenity=clinic no amenity=doctors ya que esos son para consultas ambulatorias y esto ofrece "residencia".

En definitiva lo importante es que el mapeo que se haga sea coherente con otras cosas que den servicio similar y ya esten mapeadas ya sea aca en Uruguay o en otras partes...
NeisBot (2026-02-06 05:55:41+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 9 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/936203353 v5 | 9 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178126568
NeisReview (2026-02-15 05:33:29+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/178177735
Stalker61 (2026-02-13 09:45:38+00:00): Здравствуйте.
За такое исправление геометрии пальца ломать надо. Правку расцениваю вандальной. А посему откат.
Hung Tran 9x0 (2026-02-28 09:49:39+00:00): Lối quay đầu trước học viện báo chí đã bị đóng từ lâu. Hôm nay tôi đi qua vẫn bị  đóng.
Hung Tran 9x0 (2026-02-28 09:50:07+00:00): Không biết bạn đi qua đây ngày nào mà lại tạo lối đi này
NeisBot (2026-02-06 05:59:06+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/832716493 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Cleaning service"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-15 05:33:00+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178569202
(No visible changes after review)
VLD0251 (2026-02-05 12:51:24+00:00): Thanks for your contribution! please use a more specific tag than shop=yes. use shop=convenience for a local grocery store.
Happy mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178127533
yitimox (2026-02-26 13:11:10+00:00): REPORTED
Warin61 (2026-02-06 06:57:34+00:00): I don't see this on the Aust Data Soces page ... so is this a copyright breach???