piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Carto'Cité (2024-05-13 10:17:11+00:00): Bonjour.
L'avenue Jean Mermoz est bordée d'une bande cyclable et non d'une piste cyclable. La chaussée n'est pas séparée, iI convient donc de ne pas tracer de way séparé, mais d'ajouter le tag cycleway=track sur le way, et en l'occurence cycleway:left=lane et cycleway:right=shared_lane. C'était déjà le cas sur https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/155426286, donc en l'occurence tu avais créé un doublon d'aménagement cyclable.
Je corrige, et je suis à ta dispo pour en discuter :-)
Antoine.
NorthCrab (2023-02-07 14:52:22+00:00): Witaj, nie nadawaj obiektom zbędnych tagów dostępowych. Zapoznaj się z domyślnymi wartościami na https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Poland - najprościej jest po prostu nic nie uzupełniać jeśli nie ma żadnych znaków zakazu/nakazu.

Dodatkowo, twój komentarz do zestawu nie wyjaśnia dlaczego usunąłeś ten odcinek ścieżki - https://img.monicz.dev/-2bZ2Lfv4mY Jaki jest tego powód? Pozdrawiam!
Frans S (2023-02-07 10:05:52+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
A remark. The tag highway=residential is to be used in urban areas. Not in rural areas. I adjusted them.
I don't know if you noticed it. But when you tag a building as building=construction, the validation tool gives a warning.
According to the wiki an additional tag is required, like construction=building, or warehouse. 
When combined with landuse=construction, this tag can be used to specify what the landuse will be once construction is completed. Typically, these will be one of the common "developed land" values - for example construction=residential when mapping an under-construction housing development. 
This is what the wiki says :
Buildings

building=construction with construction=* describing type of building being constructed is in use. For example building=construction construction=apartments 
Best regards
YjM (2023-02-07 12:29:28+00:00): Dear @[Frans S], thank you for your remark. I haven't noticed any highway=residential in rural areas, thanks for corrections!

Regarding the building=construction. Sure, I have noticed the warning. But there is nothing I can do about it from my place. I have no additional knowledge about the type of building being constructed, so I can not add any construction=*. Also, adding construction=building as you propose is vastly redundant, as it is already implied by building=construction. 

Best regards
 Jan
Frans S (2023-02-07 12:57:56+00:00): Hi Jan.
About the tag construction= …
I agree with you. But, with only the building=yes an error pops up when I validate a task.  Till a short time ago it was not an error. Things changes.
Best regards.
YjM (2023-02-07 14:41:12+00:00): Dear Frans, I understand your concerns. I see the validation warning in JOSM just as any other warning. It is not a data error, only a warning. Like "street has no name". When you can improve it, you should, but when you don't have the local knowledge, just pass it.

Kind Regards
 Jan
maraf24 (2023-02-06 22:24:37+00:00): /dodany parking rowerowy/
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-02-07 19:01:42+00:00): Hi,
Is there any particular point in creating relations for streets made from a single way?
LeeMarx (2023-02-07 19:23:00+00:00): Hello, its needed to make the map work on wikipedia.
MxxCon (2023-02-07 07:36:42+00:00): Hello.
"Times Square" is already encoded in the "branch=" tag. And location description is unnecessary in the name since it's obvious where it is located.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132179929
jxpsert (2023-04-27 19:32:01+00:00): Feel free to explain "lanes=500" here.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-04-27 22:47:04+00:00): 5m wide perhaps?
jxpsert (2023-04-28 06:01:02+00:00): Well, that would just be width=5.
Strubbl (2023-02-07 19:19:48+00:00): Hi Arne,
warum löscht du die Hydranten aus OSM? Kannst du außerdem bitte deinen Kommentar für den Änderungssatz ausformulieren? "fd" ist nichtssagend. Es würde helfen, wenn du anderen Mappern kurz beschreibst, was deine Änderung umfasst.

Viele Grüße
dafadllyn (2023-07-09 18:47:08+00:00): Hi jce70!

Thanks for trying to help fixing errors. However, please note that not everything iD or any error detecting tool suggest is correct. Error detecting tools should not be trusted blindly and their suggestions should always be checked. For example in the case of Coop City Ryfflihof (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9418656) the suggested change from supermarket to department store was wrong.

Best regards
OSM_RogerWilco (2023-02-07 10:00:09+00:00): Hallo Arne2023,

bitte den name-Tag nur für echte Eigennamen verwenden. Beschreibungen werden (wenn nicht durch die anderen Tags beschrieben) in description eingetragen.

Siehe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen#name_ist_nur_der_Name

Änderst Du das bitte?

Viele Grüße
Roger Wilco
muralito (2023-02-07 12:59:57+00:00): Hi. Be careful with the source used. The railway is under construction using an entrenchment. I don't know which connections are right now, or will be when the construction is finished.
hayes9 (2023-02-08 20:01:01+00:00): Hi Muralito, thanks for reaching out. Maxar SecureWatch Imagery from 2023-01-07 does not show any signs of construction, do you know of any resources that would detail these construction projects? That would help model this area appropriately until construction is done. Thanks!
muralito (2023-02-09 23:51:48+00:00): No, I don't have recent imagery but i have been following this thread in https://www.skyscrapercity.com/threads/ferroviario-proyecto-ferrocarril-central.2023853 and other news in the media.
hayes9 (2023-02-10 21:17:31+00:00): Thank you for the information!
muralito (2023-03-13 18:05:03+00:00): I have found a video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ShDKzYvKE5U that shows the entrenchment, and at least to the north of Atanasio Sierra street most of the streets cross above the railway and are already in use.
hayes9 (2023-03-14 21:42:53+00:00): Thanks for sharing!
Carto'Cité (2023-12-11 17:55:49+00:00): Bonjour Popolon,
Merci pour tes contributions sur les aménagements cyclables. J'ai fait une correction car tu avais ajouté une piste mais a priori il s'agit bien d'une bande en double sens cyclable et elle était déjà décrite. Mais iD ne rend pas ce genre d'objet alors c'est possible que tu ne l'aies pas vue. Pour la voir le mieux est JOSM avec un rendu vélo ou le rendu CyclOSM.
J'ai donc supprimé cette piste :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1138521631
Car sur ces deux way il y a des opposite_lane :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1016865860
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27365307
N’hésite pas à me contacter si tu as la moindre question ou remarque 🙂
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
Carto'Cité (2023-12-11 17:58:57+00:00): Cette piste était également concernée :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1138521632
Charles
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-06 23:20:27+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10613006668
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10613006694
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10613006696
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10613026205
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10613026212
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10613026240
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10613026252
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10613026256

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
syntex (2023-02-07 11:05:41+00:00): No nie właśnie xD Ta ulica jest dalej. Jaki dałeś promień wykrywania tych adresów?
NorthCrab (2023-02-07 11:48:33+00:00): 500, zwiększone już do 1000 :-)
abrensch (2023-02-12 18:28:44+00:00): Hallo Lodda,

hier hast Du was "verzuppelt" :

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9503110455#map=19/50.03896/6.76627

Schaust Du mal?

Danke und Gruss, Arndt
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-06 23:30:20+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10613034541
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10613034583
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10613034584
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10613034585
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10613034586
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10613034587

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
syntex (2023-02-07 11:19:13+00:00): Ok, brakowało dwóch nazw ulic, dodałem
mueschel (2023-02-12 10:42:06+00:00): Hi,
you added ways with only 'left, 'right' and 'righ' tags. These are not used in other places, what do they represent?
fayor (2023-02-12 19:27:28+00:00): The ways are the borders of the postal areas, I had drawn them as a reminder to transform them into relations.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-06 23:50:40+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184971837
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184972018
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184972022
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10613042677
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10613055925
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10613055926
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10613055931
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10613055946
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10613056005
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10613056023
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10613056056
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10613056063
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10613056071
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10613056072
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10613056093
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10613056184
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10613056186
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10613056203
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10613056233
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10613056234
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10613056235
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10613056236
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10613056248
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10613056285
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10613056294
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10613056331
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10613056377
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10613056378

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
syntex (2023-02-07 11:38:31+00:00): Ok, faktycznie części nazw dróg nie było. Dodałem je. Ale też część z tych adresów jest po prostu bardzo daleko od nazwanej drogi.
NorthCrab (2023-02-07 11:41:04+00:00): Okej popatrzę i zwiększę zasięg szukania.
NorthCrab (2023-02-07 11:47:53+00:00): Zwiększyłem z 500 do 1000 metrów.
jeslop (2023-02-07 15:32:27+00:00): Restablezco el nodo de la localidad a su estado anterior. 

El nombre correcto es el que figuraba en la fuente que has eliminado.

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
data@osmfoundation.org
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-07 00:10:22+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1138293240

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Supaplex (2023-02-07 07:28:19+00:00): 你刪掉YouBike2.0的站，撤站的是YouBike1.0，並非YouBike2.0
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132182750
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2023-02-28 20:09:48+00:00): نرجوا منكم عدم إضافة عناصر عشوائية للخريطة
VigilantPenguin (2023-03-14 19:15:51+00:00): I've seen a mix of city documentation for how the name of this park is typeset, but I think written Lushootseed doesn't typically include the spaces between letters seen here. Thoughts on changing the "name" tag to "ƛ̕ax̌ʷadis" (and would recommend adding it as "name:lut" too)?
seattlefyi (2023-03-15 00:04:53+00:00): Thanks for the note. I'd seen the different documentation as well, and tried but wasn't able to find a definitive answer. I'm fine if you'd like to go ahead and make both of those changes though. Thanks again!
VigilantPenguin (2023-03-15 19:10:59+00:00): Will do, thanks for the feedback!
tyfi (2023-12-25 01:27:50+00:00): Hi. Is this your business? Is there a website or other detail you'd like added? Thanks
Allison P (2024-01-01 15:12:32+00:00): No, it is a private residence and should be deleted
Cyclono (2023-02-19 23:24:53+00:00): nice, someone else is also mapping in norilsk :D good job
TheOutpost (2023-02-20 00:05:35+00:00): It’s a one of a kind city!
Lachgast (2023-02-07 13:43:38+00:00): Ah, ik dorstte dat nog niet. Had op locatie gekeken of ik ergens een naam kon ontwaren. Nuon --> Vattenfall is natuurlijk een logische wijziging, dus ik vermoed dat dat vrij achteloos kan gebeuren. De centrale staat er in ieder geval nog :)

Dank, A67-A67!
A67-A67 (2023-02-07 20:55:45+00:00): Wikipedia noemt het Cluster Velsen, zonder naam van de eigenaar en Vattenfall spreekt alleen over "Velsen" op hun website. Dus een correcte naam is lastig vast te stellen.

Door de wijziging Nuon Cluster Velsen --> Vattenfall Cluster Velsen verandert er niets aan de opbouw van de naam, maar wordt wel de naam van de eigenaar bijgewerkt.
SomeoneElse (2023-02-07 11:30:52+00:00): Hello, and welcome to Openstreetmap!
What does "Minor changes made in this Region" mean?
Best Regards,
Andy
adrianojbr (2023-02-07 17:25:10+00:00): Olá, dcrego!

As vias internas do residencial não devem receber o menos nome da área residencial.

Basicamente, a via estava certa como estava antes.

Abraço!
muralito (2023-02-07 12:50:22+00:00): Hola. Para mi lo que va ahi es el barrier=border_control como estaba. Lo de Aduanas seria adicional pero siempre tenes que pasar por un border_control antes.
serock (2023-02-07 19:42:55+00:00): Hola muralito, si fue el que mas duda me causo de modificarlo, sobre el mal uso de barrier=border_control como en otros casos, tiene razón en lo que dice, y ahora lo revierto, gracias y saludos !!!
muralito (2023-02-08 13:20:16+00:00): Si, porque aca llegan las lanchas de Carmelo. Hay que pasar por migraciones en cada una de las puntas. Y hay una ruta de ferry entre ambas.
adrianojbr (2023-02-07 17:32:11+00:00): Olá, dcrego!

Os edifícios do Residencial Ouro Verde que você adicionou foram alinhados pelo teto, quando o correto é alinhar pela base, pois agora eles estão "fora" da área do residencial. Além disso, eles ficaram fora de esquadro (para corrigir, é só cliar no objeto com o botão direito e usar a função de ortogonalizar). Ainda, não se deve colocar em name descrições do objeto, como "Salão de Festas". Se algo não tem nome, fica em branco mesmo.

No Container CSE, tem uma via de pedestres que passa sobre o edifícios? Acho que o correto seria o edifício receber layer=1 ou a via layer-1 com a adição tunnel=building_passage.

Também acho que o Centro Socioeconômico recebeu o layer=1 de forma indevida. Não sei porque você adicionou, mas vejo que área não está desenhada corretamente, fazendo com que o bicicletário fique dentro do edifício.

Abraço!
dcrego (2023-02-08 01:42:29+00:00): Boa noite, 

Peço desculpas pelos erros, estou em minhas primeiras edições. Quanto ao Residencial Ouro Verde, minha intenção era adicionar parte da via que existe de fato e dois blocos que não constavam. Vou corrigir o formato. Entendi a observação quanto ao 

Quando ao Container CSE, não é exatamente um edifício, mas um toldo que engloba dois containers e uma pequena praça de alimentação com mesas e cadeiras. A calçada está correta e passa por dentro da área de alimentação. 

Quanto ao Centro Socioeconômico, creio que tenha colocado o formato assim por engano. Minha intenção era corrigir a área do Centro de Ciências Jurídicas, cujo bloco inferior (que é internamente ligado ao bloco superior, vizinho ao fórum) estava constando como parte do Centro Socioeconômico. Os dois centros também são ligados entre si nos andares superiores por passarelas, não sei no entanto se isso deve constar. O bicicletário fica rente a parede externa do Centro Socioeconômico. 

Tentei corrigir todas as falhas, espero que esteja correto agora!
dcrego (2023-02-08 01:44:00+00:00): falhas corrigidas no conjunto de alterações 132185654
adrianojbr (2023-02-09 13:05:17+00:00): Olá!

Não há por que se desculpar, pois somos voluntários e estamos todos aprendendo. Normal cometer erros, faz parte do processo de aprendizado, ainda mais quando estamos começando. Fica sossegado!

Vi as correções em http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=132232613.

Agora os edifícios do Residencial Ouro Verde estão alinhados corretamente, porém não precisava ter apagado as área anteriores, bastava reposicioná-las. Fica como orientação para edições futuras.

Entendi quanto ao Container CSE. Alguns detalhes são mais complexos de corrigir, sendo melhor simplificar mesmo.

A respeito do CSE está correto. Já sobre as passarelas, também podem ser representados, dependendo do nível de detalhe que se queira dar ao mapa (micromapeamento). Inclusive é possível fazer o mapeamento interno (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_Indoor_Tagging).

Abraço!
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-07 03:53:12+00:00): Non-existent "demolished" roadways were also removed.
Deus Figendi (2023-02-07 04:36:40+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132186456#map=17/52.00282/8.77499&layers=NG
IKM Center Kota Magelang (2023-02-07 04:53:02+00:00): IKM Center Kota Magelang
InsertUser (2023-02-07 08:56:49+00:00): Do you have a source for node 10613335740 being a lift gate? IIRC at least one of the gates is a full sized metal one that either swings or slides.
InsertUser (2023-02-07 08:59:54+00:00): I can't remember if licenced for OSM, but this would tend to agree: https://storms.ngs.noaa.gov/storms/dorian/index.html#20/26.54342/-78.58181
LakeBaikal (2023-02-08 11:13:29+00:00): Hello InsertUser, thank you for reaching out.  I added this lift gate after investigating on the ground imagery (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=26.5436207782&lng=-78.5816237424&z=17&pKey=216109673359662&focus=photo&x=0.4999120029165013&y=0.5248055444177744&zoom=0.24942721960679548), you can see in mapillary imagery that there is also a lift gate in front of the gate that you have mentioned.  I modelled the lift gate in front of the barrier=gate tag just as it is in the ground level resource I cited. Have a good day.
SvM (2023-02-08 18:45:48+00:00): День добрый!
Соблюдайте, пожалуйста, принятое соглашение о наименовании дорог.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%92%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%82_%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BE%D0%B1_%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3

Не вынуждайте других участников проекта ваши правки исправлять или откатывать
5m4u9 (2023-02-07 08:17:05+00:00): Hi, what is the source of the change? Recently (2022), the city hall changed the direction of the streets in this area.
MountNyiragongo (2023-02-08 11:09:49+00:00): Hello 5m4u9, thank you for reaching out. The resource that I used is the Jan 22, 2023 aerial image from the Maxar Secure Watch imagery database. In it there are bidirectional painted arrow markings on the western intersection with Avenida Melchor Urquidi that indicates cars can both enter to and exit from Calle Zenon Salinas. I am unaware of the other changes to directionality that occurred during 2022 in the city, but if you have visited this intersection in the past few weeks and know for certain that those painted arrows have been removed, then I can reapply the oneway tag. Thanks for reaching out.
JJIglesias (2023-02-15 06:31:22+00:00): I used to live in that same road in the 1450 of Calle Miguel de Aguirre and could confirm that the road is now one way from west to east, however there are vehicles, that still use it in both ways.
MountNyiragongo (2023-02-16 12:16:17+00:00): Hello, since you have recent local knowledge, I will leave you to update to your observations. Thank you.
JJIglesias (2023-02-16 21:07:26+00:00): Anyhow, thanks for your editions and fell free to keep doing so. If you have any doubt that could arise do not hesitate to contact either Marco Antonio 5m4u9 or myself JJIglesias.

Very Best Regards
JJ
MountNyiragongo (2023-02-17 11:12:38+00:00): Thank you for the assistance.  Happy mapping.
GITNE (2023-02-07 13:51:03+00:00): It’s sad that you lack the resolve to sand up to your mistakes and apparently have no appreciation for other people’s work. If only you would put in the same amount of energy and effort to fix your mistakes that you have invested in obliviously damaging good work that has served many people well, the world would be a better place. From what I can see, your fixing efforts are rather halfhearted at best and you are breaking even more. Apparently, you do not fully understand how `destination:*` tags are supposed to be mapped. Let this be a life lesson to you: Just because you *can* do something it does not mean you *should*, especially when you are unaware of what you are doing. The next life lesson is: Stand up to your mistakes and try to fix them completely not just superficially. So, I would suggest that you better stop mapping `destination:*` tags for the sake of other OpenStreetMap users and contributors because you are doing more harm than good.

You also do not understand how turn restrictions actually work, in other words, what is their meaning to OpenStreetMap and what do they actually map because you have fallen into the same trap like many other new mappers before you. You have started to add `restriction=no_u_turn` relations with identical ways in the `from` and `to` roles. These turn restriction relations DO NOT add any value to the map. They do not fix navigation either. Turn restriction relations map the flow of traffic, not the legal situation on the road. What you are trying to map is the legal situation on the road. For this purpose you should map using the `traffic_sign` tag.

You also apparently do not know when or how to map roads with ways.
1. We do not map lanes with ways.
2. We only map separate ways when there is a physical barrier or divider between road surfaces.
3. We do not delete inaccessible roads, even if they are in decay. We tag them `access=no`.

Final life lesson for the day: Think twice, sometimes even three times before you act because what may seem simple to do can cause a lot of damage when done or done badly. You are still a new mapper. Start with the simple stuff like adding buildings and roads. Learn by observing what others have done, especially very experienced mappers before you touch anything more complex. And, read the OpenStreetMap Wiki before you start learning a new potentially more complex mapping scheme. There is always more than to it than you may think. Thus, you may also want to use a more sophisticated editor than iD before mapping anything more complex, like [JOSM](https://josm.openstreetmap.de "Java OpenStreetMap Editor").
Moldovan_Merkator (2023-02-07 05:42:08+00:00): Hello, why did you removed these roads? They are on the imagery.
jslawin2 (2024-02-11 04:06:52+00:00): Poprawiłem
mavl (2023-04-25 09:04:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
Cebderby (2023-02-07 23:07:37+00:00): Deliberate false information added to the map in this and previous changeset reverted.
Cebderby (2023-02-07 23:08:11+00:00): Deliberately false information added to the map in this and last changeset, again, reverted
mavl (2023-04-25 09:07:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
Supaplex (2023-02-07 09:04:51+00:00): 安坑->暗坑
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132188036
Allison P (2023-02-07 16:25:00+00:00): This turn restriction https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15443553 says that people must make a U-turn here, meaning they can't go straight. This is obviously wrong.