piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
janith (2024-06-26 02:08:06+00:00): Supporting URLs:

https://universalhomes.co.nz/properties/g02-100-cadness-street/

https://universalhomes.co.nz/properties/pu-44-201-100-cadness-street/

https://universalhomes.co.nz/properties/101-100-cadness-street/
janith (2024-06-26 02:47:37+00:00): NZ Addresses Dataset lookup: https://i.imgur.com/FQzGEg3.png
ElliottPlack (2024-06-27 02:24:54+00:00): Hi there. I'm Elliott with the Data Working Group. The GIS you are citing in this changeset, what is it precisely? Referencing GIS data requires the data be in an OSM compatible license, or you must have explicit permission to use it that is documented in the wiki. Further, the municode site caries a copyright (Copyright © 2024 Municode.com ) which is inherently incompatible with the OSM ODBL. Municode would need to give permission for you to use it as a reference. Remember that only federal works of the United States **Federal** government are in public domain by default. Every state and lower government is free to copyright their works. Just because it is a government source, does not make it able to be used in OSM. Please contact us at data@openstreetmap.org or in this changeset if you'd like to discuss further. In the meantime, please refrain from using any GIS sources for justification unless you first secure permission and document it on the OSM wiki just like any import.

Thanks!
StreetSurveyor (2024-06-27 02:53:21+00:00): I don’t fully understand this. Isn’t GIS every towns official source that should be used to verify roads against? Typically each town has one. What should be used as a source?
StreetSurveyor (2024-06-27 03:00:24+00:00): The GIS is:

https://gis.vgsi.com/SomervilleMAMap/index.html
KiloThree (2024-06-27 17:56:28+00:00): Are laws of states and municipalities in the US not public domain automatically? While works of the states and municipalities might not be public domain, the text of law I thought was. 

The municode link there is to the Somerville Code of Ordinances. That said, I can provide attestation that the street is signed as Grand Union Boulevard, in alignment with local law.

I do not believe Somerville provides an online browsable street GIS solution (Vision primarily contains parcel data, and the street basemap is demonstrably out of line with surface conditions and ordinance), however public domain ESRI data is here: https://data.somervillema.gov/GIS-Data/Streets/7jtq-qmnf/about_data
WoodWoseWulf (2024-06-26 03:02:11+00:00): Hi Davideous,

I think that the feature you've mapped as a bench here is actually just a wooden barrier. -34.3194911, 150.9261152

If possible could I also please ask the source of the names for the parks you've added?
WoodWoseWulf (2024-06-29 06:59:23+00:00): Hi Davideous,
Not sure if you saw the comment here or not. If I don't hear back from you in the coming days I will remove these names and retag the "bench" appropriately.
Davideous (2024-06-30 04:48:08+00:00): Do what you like, I dont care. As for "names" I only added the title to one reserve -not multiple. The other adjustments are to boundary lines.
nevw (2024-06-26 02:57:53+00:00): Hi, the private driveway off Centennial Crescent should not have a name.
nevw (2024-06-26 03:57:28+00:00): You should draw the outlines of the buildings along the driveway and add address tags to those instead. See other examples in the area that have address tags added.
ChromeLotus (2024-07-08 16:10:12+00:00): Hello Allouche OBAME, Thank you for your contributions to OSM. I noticed that a stretch of highway was updated from primary to trunk classification (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153181257). The OSM Editing Guidelines for Gabon suggest that trunk classification is applied to highway features with N and R routes (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Gabon). In addition, the affected features appear disconnected from the rest of the region’s trunk network. I am curious if you could provide insight or resources for the basis of these classification changes? Looking forward to hearing from you and hope you have a nice day!
ChromeLotus (2024-07-30 19:37:35+00:00): Hello Allouche OBAME, 
I hope you're doing well. I wanted to follow up on a message I sent weeks ago regarding a stretch of highway features modified from primary to trunk classification (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153181257). I wanted to reiterate that the Gabon Editing Guidelines (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Gabon) indicate that trunk classification is applied to highway features with N and R routes.  Do you have any objections if I change the highway classification back to primary? This would not only follow the guidelines, but also unify the network into a cohesive classification in the region. I look forward to hearing from you!

Traduction automatique
Bonjour Allouche OBAME, 
J'espère que tu vas bien. Je voulais faire suite à un message que j'ai envoyé il y a des semaines concernant un tronçon d'entités routières modifiées de la classification principale à la classification principale (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153181257). Je voulais réitérer que les directives d'édition du Gabon indiquent que la classification des principales routes est appliquée aux entités routières avec des routes N et R.  Avez-vous des objections si je ramène la classification des autoroutes à primaire ? Cela respecterait non seulement les lignes directrices, mais unifierait également le réseau en une classification cohérente dans la région. Je suis dans l'attente de votre réponse!
mariotomo (2024-07-21 13:19:46+00:00): hola. gracias por intentar tener al día la base de datos OSM. cuidado con las relaciones y el etiquetado de los miembros. quizás iD no sea lo más adecuado para esta clase de mejoras.
A propósito de la extensión del parque Manuel Antonio, creo que antes estaba (un poco) mejor.
https://www.sinac.go.cr/ES/asp/Documents/Areas%20Silvestres%20Protegidas.rar
mariotomo (2024-10-18 05:52:06+00:00): la relación que había quedado rota, la mejoró gscholz en el conjunto https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155153995
queda la pregunta si no estuviera mejor antes de tu cambio.
mariotomo (2025-05-26 04:33:58+00:00): acabo de revertir el cambio geométrico.
HECTOR POLO (2025-05-27 04:48:40+00:00): Excelente el cambio. Está público?
AlexMQ (2024-06-26 22:55:42+00:00): (this was supposed to be two changesets, i just forgot to close the first for ungluing Walton Woods Park and the natural=wood from houses and paths before uploading the parking lots so merged them and overwrote the details instead)
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-26 03:49:36+00:00): Hello boater99. Thanks for yoru work, but it appears that you have deleted some buildings that are still visible in Bing imagery, & in some cases, replaced them either with another building in the same spot, or buildings that aren't visible on imagery? One example is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1296221295#map=19/0.52397/25.21430. What are you attempting to do here, thanks?
boater99 (2024-06-26 04:39:03+00:00): on the satellite image that I am mapping off of the "buildings"
that are shown there are not the same shape or lined up with anything, so it seemed easier to clear it and remap it. Is there a better way to do this?
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 04:29:11+00:00): OK, in that case, that's fine.
Kovoschiz (2024-06-26 13:00:51+00:00): Please completely transfer tags when you delete and redraw. That's not preferred for this reason. Adjust the shape.
adiatmad (2024-06-26 04:04:41+00:00): Wrong link, please check this discussion (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153136387)
tyfi (2024-06-26 04:12:32+00:00): This normalized the tagging of name "Old Highway 21" by putting it in alt_name and old_ref, and it added ref tags for county road designators, a bridge over Charles Creek (I am reasonably confident that's not a culvert), and a segment of said creek
tastrax (2024-06-30 05:37:08+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, +61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
NightH (2024-06-27 05:48:54+00:00): Kérlek csak olyan módosítást eszközölj, amiben biztos vagy. A "víztorony helyett magasles" tipped totálisan hibás. Minimum ellenőrizd több elérhető forrásból is a kétes infót. A FÖMI 2005ös képen, a Bing műholdképen, az ESRI-n, a Mapboxon mindenhol szépen kirajzolódik a hidroglóbusz alakja.
Hungarian_user (2024-06-27 08:02:52+00:00): Az úgy szokott történni, hogy kétséges objektum esetén előzetesen mindegyik légifelvételen megnézem, de víztornyot egyiken se láttam. A "szépen kirajzolódik" erős költői túlzás, mert nagy jóindulat kell hozzá, hogy az a pálcika, ami látszik, az esetleg víztorony lenne. Ilyen bizonytalan infóra nem érdemes alapozni.

Nálam ezzel szemben működik egy ún. "józan ész", ami logikán és tapasztalaton alapul. Az eddig térképen, illetve légifelvételeken látott pár száz valódi víztorony egyike sem volt erdőben, ezért az ilyen létezése kétséges. A kétséges állításhoz erős bizonyíték kell. Van pár kérdés ezzel az állítólagos víztoronnyal kapcsolatban: 1. hogyan közelíthető meg? (út nem vezet hozzá, még gyalogos ösvény sem).
2. Hogyan töltik fel vízzel? (ehhez ivóvíz-hálózat szükséges)
3. Kik használják? (fogyasztó nagyrészt háromféle szokott lenni: lakosság, ipar, mezőgazdaság). A "fogyasztók" épületeket is jelentenek, amik 200 m-en belül nincsenek. Az elképzelhető, hogy valamikor volt itt valami, ami azóta megszűnt. Akkor viszont "romos"-nak kellene jelölni, ahogy tőle kissé É-ra egy medencénél látható.
NightH (2024-06-27 08:25:55+00:00): Összegezzük mi történt:
Volt a térképen egy helyes információ, te pedig bármilyen forrás nélkül, hasraütésszerűen a "józan észre" hivatkozva elrontottad, miközben a hidroglóbusz alakja több műholdképen is felismerhető.

Kérlek meglevő információt mindenfajta forrásvizsgálat nélkül, a "józan észre" hivatkozva ne írj át, mert azzal könnyen hibát követsz el. Ugyanígy, amíg nincs erre vonatkozó megbízható információd, addig ne javítsd át "romos"-ra.
NightH (2024-06-27 09:06:51+00:00): Plusz egy tanács... Ha valamiben nem vagy biztos, de gyanús, hogy az ott úgy nem jó, akkor egyszerűen dobj rá egy fixme=verify címkét. Ha valaki arra jár, vagy van bármilyen _megbízható_ információja arról, hogy az objektum ott van-e vagy sem, hogy megfelelően van-e címkézve vagy sem, az majd ez alapján javítani fogja.
Layft Greater (2024-06-26 09:10:57+00:00): Are you importing some kind of data? Source?
LockOnGuy (2024-06-28 04:38:37+00:00): Elhamn1992, I had asked you and your team before to keep your changesets local, aka small area at a time. The way you are doing it is spamming the history tap with large changeset box that is all over multiple countries. Please keep your edits local.    
Regards.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-12 04:57:51+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164840287
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-26 06:36:10+00:00): Hi & welcome to OSM. Thanks for your enthusiam, but you've mapped this residential area as a single building, & also named it "Residential Area". The area should be landuse=residential_area, & the buildings mapped individually. Could you please fix it up? Thanks!
sleeping_cat (2024-06-26 06:19:54+00:00): https://postimg.cc/rd5f4qdF
DD1GJ (2024-06-26 09:53:35+00:00): Hallo Simon, willkommen bei OSM. Ich habe Deine Löschung rückgängig gemacht und den Weg auf "abandoned" gesetzt, da dieser auf Luftbildern noch deutlich sichtbar ist. Ansonsten könnte ein anderer Mapper diesen wieder einzeichnen.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/482308065/history

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lebenszyklus-Pr%C3%A4fix

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Viele Grüße, Joachim
literan (2024-06-26 18:03:45+00:00): вы рисуете здания поверх заборов. Кажется, уже просили так не делать. Надо подвинуть забор аккуратно в сторону
Tatiana24 (2024-06-26 20:24:23+00:00): извините, спасибо что подсказали, буду двигать в следующий раз
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-26 06:51:41+00:00): Temporary block revoked. It was triggered by mapping both sides of the World, so please pick one area & stay there for a while! Also, when you've finished mapping buildings, please hit your Q key to straightee their corners. Thanks
f_husni (2024-08-07 07:53:06+00:00): Hallo, untuk way 614639592 ini mas merubah dari klasifikasi track menjadi trunk. menurut panduan osm hal ini tidak dibenarkan terlebih jalan trunk yang mas rekomendasikan itu buntu karena ada aliran sungai ( way 614639592
way 1296275158
way 612809917
way 1296275159
way 612809930
way 1296275160
way 612809927
way 1296275161) bagaimana bisa jalan nasional buntu dan hanya terhubung dengan jalur offroad atau pertanian seperti track. 

adapun jika memang jalan ini akan digantikan atau dibangun menjadi trunk, tolong pastikan dulu jika jalan tersebut memaang benar sudah siap digunakan, jangan jalan tersebut masih rencana tapi mas sudah mengganti nya menjadi trunk. saya sangat terbuka terhadap diskusi dan sangat senang jika kita bisa berdiskusi lebih lanjut terutama terkait beberapa jalan yang sudah menjadi klasifikasi trunk. terimakasih
aseidel (2024-06-26 12:18:20+00:00): Liebe Gesa R,
bitte im smoothness-Tag den Typo korrigieren (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/102814865) und bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/342771215 noch lit=* und class:bicycle=* ergänzen.
Danke und herzliche Grüße
Antje Seidel
#lgmaps
ZLima12 (2024-06-26 07:15:34+00:00): If you disagree with this, please comment here before resorting to reverting. Though I have driven the road before, I am not a local, so I am happy to listen to local input here.
keithonearth (2024-06-26 07:10:04+00:00): Here's a link to the changeset in question: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123327250
Yitzchak M (2024-07-04 02:32:40+00:00): השערים שאני הגדרתי הם קיימים. תלך ותראה! למה מחקת אותם?
Sanniu (2024-07-04 04:01:10+00:00): And they always closed? As gate defined as as closed by default and prohibit all traffic including pedestrians. If so, please define surrounding streets as unaccessible.
Yitzchak M (2024-07-04 04:10:31+00:00): Sorry, but you are wrong. The gate is closed at night. And no motor vehicle is allowed through at night. However, at all times pedestrians and bicycles ARE allowed through. This is the official tagging procedure here in Israel. I will be putting the gates back. If you have a question of the Israeli tagging procedures, you may join the Israel OSM Telegram group, even in English, and ask your questions there.
Sanniu (2024-07-04 10:56:15+00:00): So, please tag gates appropriately with conditional close on vehicles. תודה על שיתוף פאילה.
Yitzchak M (2024-07-04 11:30:28+00:00): You are welcome to add whatever you wish to my tags, but not to delete them! I am using the Israel conventions for tagging.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Israel
NieWnen (2024-07-04 19:05:32+00:00): `noexit=yes` dajemy na węzłach, które nie łączą się z innymi drogami (w tym chodnikami, czy ścieżkami rowerowymi itp.). Takie użycie jest niepoprawne.
 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:noexit%3Dyes

Poprawiłem jak coś.
Tomek | Yanosik (2024-07-08 07:28:14+00:00): ok dzięki
SomeoneElse (2024-06-26 10:39:47+00:00): Hello MKBE_,

Temporary restrictions such as "They are fixing one side of the road at a time to prevent a full road closure" tend not to be mapped "live" in OSM.  If a road is closed for months, that's a different story.  The reason for this is that the cadence of updates from OSM that users see varies hugely (in apps, monthly is common).

For further discussion, https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/uk/86 is a better place than here as more people will see it and be able to comment.

Best Regards,

Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
MKBE_ (2024-06-26 07:09:31+00:00): Why do you keep reverting my changes. This is a temporary closure
MKBE_ (2024-06-26 07:09:53+00:00): *one-way restriction
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-06-26 10:34:44+00:00): I've tried explaining it multiple times. Check your email
aseidel (2024-06-26 12:06:23+00:00): Liebe Gesa R,
bitte die Verkehrsschilder nicht auf die Linie oder vorhandene Nodes setzen, sondern als eigene Objekte anlegen. Die Richtung wird dann mit Himmelsrichtungen anstelle von forward/backward angegeben.
Danke und herzliche Grüße
Antje Seidel
#lgmaps
dadavid (2026-03-30 10:50:39+00:00): Hi :) ist das hier wirklich eine Furt? :) 

Viele Grüße

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/230754018
aseidel (2024-06-26 12:04:38+00:00): Liebe Gesa R,
bitte hier die Breite mit width=* angeben (nicht maxwidth:physical=*), da die Breite über die gesamte Länge des Weges gleich bleibt.
Außerdem Breite bitte als width=3.5 (mit Punkt statt Komma) angeben.
Danke und herzliche Grüße
Antje Seidel
#lgmaps
HellMap (2024-06-26 09:31:06+00:00): Sveiki,

Paldies par izmaiņām.

Piebildīšu, ka ēkas zīmē pēc to fiziskā izkārtojuma un ne pēc tā, kas tajās atrodas. Šajā gadījumā, viss ēkas komplekss ir viena ēka. Atsevišķas norises vietas parasti tajā atzīmē ar punktu ar attiecīgu vērtību.

Es šeit pielaboju.

Ja Jūs varētu precizēt, kas tieši ir "Popkorns" un "Kopstrādes telpas", tad varētu arī uzlikt precīzākus apzīmējumus punktiem. Pašlaik tie uzlikti kā pasākumu norises vietas.

Paldies
SomeoneElse (2024-07-08 20:58:30+00:00): Hello MKBE_,

Temporary restrictions such as this tend not to be mapped "live" in OSM. If a road is closed for months, that's a different story. The reason for this is that the cadence of updates from OSM that users see varies hugely (in apps, monthly is common).

For further discussion, https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/uk/86 is a better place than here as more people will see it and be able to comment.

Also - you said "I will revert when re-opened at 23:59 on 28/6/24".  You failed to do that.

Best Regards,

Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
rskedgell (2024-07-22 13:54:21+00:00): @SomeoneElse perhaps you'd like to look at this user with your DWG hat on?
rskedgell (2024-07-22 13:54:48+00:00): * look at this user again, I mean
SomeoneElse (2024-07-22 14:02:37+00:00): Yes - got the other note.
I'll probably kick off a discussion in the forum about it.
rskedgell (2024-07-22 14:05:14+00:00): Thanks. I was about to post something to the forum, but as you do tact and diplomacy infinitely better than I do...
rskedgell (2024-07-24 10:33:34+00:00): Now reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154343220
Lezurex (2024-06-26 08:29:41+00:00): Hallo Rapppex,

Du hast angegeben, dass du eine Überprüfung deiner Änderungen wünschst. Und ich kann sagen, sieht alles prima aus.

Vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag.

LG Lezurex
GanderPL (2024-06-26 10:11:17+00:00): Nie mapujemy firm jako całych budynków. Z danych wynika, że firma zajmuje tylko jeden z lokali w budynku.
GanderPL (2024-06-26 10:11:58+00:00): Zamienione na: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12012116290
GanderPL (2024-06-26 12:48:26+00:00): Przywrócone w całości w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153200874

To, że w tym budynku działa firma, nie znaczy, że budynek nagle przestaje być historyczny, nie ma już 2 pięter, itd.  Firmy dodajemy przez node w obrębie tego budynku
Layft Greater (2024-06-26 08:11:34+00:00): Please follow mapping convention: E-roads are secondary.

The only exception is when speed limit is above 50 km/h in residential area: mapped as highway=trunk in such case. 

Unfortunately, street imagery is outdated for that street so 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cyprus#Highways_in_Cyprus
Layft Greater (2024-06-26 08:11:58+00:00): *Unfortunately, street imagery is outdated for that street so higher speed limits cannot be verified
themi97 (2024-06-26 08:59:14+00:00): Road class has nothing to do with speed limits. You are referencing a table I wrote in the wiki and if you see below I say that you have to tag e and f roads as primary if no b road and according to the official data. You can open the data if you scroll down to the section some maps and click on primary road network. As for highways and trunks again I have a note that if a road is classified as A road but speeds are 80 then it should be trunk
Layft Greater (2024-06-26 10:10:04+00:00): Interesting. Why are you angry that I am following your own guidelines then?

Could you please rewrite the road classification paragraph: 
 * The classification instructions should follow "Verifiability" principle[1]. Roads should be classifiable without external sources.
* For the Northern Cyprus refs, other than "D." are simply region names, not road class.
 * The source you have mentioned seems no longer work.

1: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Verifiability
themi97 (2024-06-26 15:42:15+00:00): Firstly I'm not angry. I'mjust really confused why you don'tunderstand the guidelines written in the wiki. I clearly stated when and how to use the correct tags.
*The source works just fine the problem might be from your end (browser used etc.)
*For the tagging in the north I'm not an expert someone who lives there should write that. The tags for the north were based on what I found online for the numbering and road class.
*Again for the verifability a main/primary road in Cyprus is not always numbered with B. And for our example here iroon avenue is one of the main road arteries in Engomi that's why the government and even resident will consider it a primary/main road even though it is classified as E.
Frans S (2024-06-26 09:09:34+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped.
However, do not connect nodes of a building to a nearby highway. Use the Alt key to map to avoid that. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153188461
valhikes (2024-07-01 15:46:22+00:00): Are there bridges there? Usually there would be culverts or fords. There are very few bridges on these track roads. I personally will only draw a culvert or bridge if I know it is there.
Dogman15 (2024-07-02 04:32:25+00:00): All right, then change them. But we can't have people drawing paths over creeks without specifying how they interact at all.
valhikes (2024-07-03 18:39:02+00:00): I realize that iD makes an apparent big deal of these crossings and makes adding bridges, culverts, and fords easy and gives you a nice pat on the back for doing it. It makes the same big deal if it is a river or a seasonal stream crossing. However, if it becomes important to how, it is vital that it is correct. That's why there's the equally valid forth option to ignore this issue.

It's an "issue" not an "error". Mapping is an iterative process. We both agree there's a road there? We wouldn't want to leave it off just because we don't know how it crosses the streams? (Streams that aren't always there, I have found on surveys of similar roads.)

I have just produced another "issue" by adding a ford to a "Road 311" south of here even though there is no water crossing shown. If you would like to repair it, I'm sure the map would be greatly improved with the addition of the Black Butte River that road happens to cross.