piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
JassKurn (2023-02-13 15:39:27+00:00): This is more of a general topic, rather than a changeset topic. I'll send you message through the "message" system.
Глеб (2023-03-01 08:22:40+00:00): На линию place не надо вешать landuse и residential, это разные вещи. Place отдельный полигон, landuse отдельный.
В центре плэйса ставится точка с дублирующимися тэгами.
LockOnGuy (2023-02-09 17:53:54+00:00): What did you edit in Iraq in this changeset? please use good changeset comment: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
mueschel (2023-02-18 13:06:47+00:00): Hi,
the tag "damage_gra" is not used by others. Please check for the correct tag
hocu (2023-02-19 08:12:59+00:00): Fixed, thanks.
NorthCrab (2023-02-09 14:38:42+00:00): Dzięki za oznaczenie! Dodałem brakujące tagi które identyfikują ten obiekt jako sklep z wyposażeniem muzyczny. Pozdrawiam!
rarad74 (2023-02-09 16:05:40+00:00): Salut. Te rog nu mai folosi abrevieri. Citeste documentatia wiki pentru abrevieri in Romania. Nu se foloseste Str. Bd. etc.
Bolt036 (2023-02-09 16:10:56+00:00): Salut! Ai dreptate, scuze! Am sa reiau documentatia. Multumesc pentru atentionare.
Константин Гам (2023-03-15 10:53:39+00:00): Уважаемый редактор! Здесь нет проезда более полугода и вчера, его не появилось. Если требуется, есть фото.
По информации на табличке с 3-х сторон стройки, дата окончания работ 24 октября. Не факт, что перекрытие будет именно так долго, но, сейчас, тут дорога перекрыта, как и была, её попросту нет, а скорее котлован.

Пожалуйста не вносите не проверенные на местности данные.
mavl (2023-02-10 17:08:04+00:00): Здравствуйте. В этом пакет явная ошибка, так как указан номер дома 625000 (addr:housenumber=625000).  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10632478470  
  
Также для тега shop нужно использовать значение на английском языке, а не значение  
shop=интернет_магазин  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:shop
mavl (2023-08-18 15:51:24+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3824234
ivanbranco (2023-02-11 09:21:26+00:00): Ciao Sara,

qualcosa era andato storto con questa modifica, quindi l'ho annullata. Avevi aggiunto il nome (presumo del negozio) come nome italiano della strada. Dovresti invece creare un nodo indipendente. Se riscontri delle difficoltà puoi anche lasciare una nota con le informazioni utili nella posizione esatta.
eggie (2023-02-10 13:50:18+00:00): Dag bruntij..   Wanneer het ook voor het stukje westelijke weg geldt dan lijkt me het hier correct.
'k Heb nog wel moped en mofa=yes toegevoegd.
Vreemd dat het routeerde voor auto's , want de slagboom was toch al gemapt?
Welke routingapp negeert een slagboom met motor_vehicle=no?
MVG
eggie
bruntij (2023-04-30 10:31:07+00:00): Hoi Eggie, ik gebruik Garmin Nuvi in de auto, ik had toen een versie zonder straatnamen, een recentere versie heb ik vorige week geprobeerd en die wil je daar via dat punt leiden. Route Almelo naar Lewedorp ( nieuwe kraijertsedijk 33_Bie oans oefje) ik heb vol verbazing deze route proberen te begrijpen, het is net of de N62 niet goed verwerkt is.
Groet Bruno
eggie (2023-04-30 14:06:03+00:00): Dag Bruno.. welke kaart zit in die Nuvi?

Hier de routering zoals die gaat via osm regels.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_car&route=51.4820%2C3.8120%3B51.4824%2C3.8069#map=15/51.4801/3.8131

Groet..
eggie
eggie (2023-04-30 14:12:26+00:00): Maar zal straks nog even naar de n62 kijken.
Groet..
eggie
eggie (2023-04-30 15:05:24+00:00): En naar Lewedorp
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_car&route=51.4809%2C3.9147%3B51.4954%2C3.7453#map=12/51.4779/3.8129
bruntij (2023-04-30 17:46:21+00:00): Ik heb de Garmin map (samengestelde tiles via download van garmin3.BBBike.org) , ik heb nog even gespeeld met de route als voetganger, dan navigeert ie wel via de schouwersweg. Ik denk dat een keer een nieuwer Garmin apparaat koop want ik loop vaker tegen problemen aan. Nogmaals bedankt Bruno
adrianojbr (2023-02-09 23:41:48+00:00): A princípio, de acordo com alteração do ponto do bairro.
Frans S (2023-02-11 11:56:47+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
Imported buildings with Mapwithai are not always correct mapped. 
Check that there are no shadows and or courtyards are included, as well as clustered buildings.
Please keep that in mind.
Best regards and keep mapping
adrianojbr (2023-02-09 23:42:15+00:00): Tudo ok!
adrianojbr (2023-02-09 23:46:20+00:00): Sem oposição à alteração da localização do ponto do bairro. Porém, desconectei da estrada.
habi (2023-02-10 10:46:03+00:00): Ciao gntrcspr

Anstatt den Spielplatz https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/70417150 zu löschen und den Park https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1113419 neu als Biberspielplatz zu benennen wäre es besser gewesen, wenn du die Ausdehnung des Spielplatzes angepasst hast.
Durch die Löschung ist jetzt nämlich hier `leisure=playground` verloren gegangen, und der Biberspielplatz existiert nur noch als Name, aber nicht mehr sog. semantisch in den Daten.
D.h. wenn jemand nach 'Spielplatz' in der Nähe sucht (ohne spezifischer Name), wird dieser nicht mehr auftauchen.

Ich habe das 'Problem' in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132351146 gelöst.

Gruss,
habi
ivanbranco (2023-02-11 09:45:39+00:00): Ciao Steve, benvenuto su OSM.

Ho notato delle cose riguardando queste modifiche, te le scrivo tutte qua per non commentare tanti changeset differenti.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/80510375
qua hai cancellato amenity=school ma il nome continua ad essere "Scuola Elementare", come mai?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8927419918/history
Qua hai cancellato un b&b, ma così facendo hai cancellato anche i dati dell'indirizzo, che così sono andati persi. La prossima volta assicurati di cancellare solo i dati dell'attività e non quelli dell'indirizzo. In linea generale fai sempre attenzione quando cancelli qualcosa, per esempio se un negozio chiude e rimane il locale vuoto per essere occupato da una futura attività è meglio cambiare i tag in shop=vacant (negozio vuoto) che cancellarlo.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/939220465/history
qua perché hai cancellato l'entrata del giornalaio?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132351604
in quest'altro changeset ho notato che hai cancellato dei nodi con gli indirizzi (per aggiungerli all'edificio) e hai cancellato degli edifici per poi ridisegnarli.
In Italia mappiamo gli indirizzi come nodi, non come tag dell'intero edificio, quindi era giusto prima. Inoltre cancellando e ridisegnando gli edifici si perde la history di questi, vedi: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132366050
in questo changeset chiamato "Correzione piazza" hai cancellato tutte le footway della piazza, come mai?

In generale ti consiglierei di essere molto prudente con le cancellazioni, specialmente se sono i tuoi primi changeset.
limes11 (2023-02-09 22:38:24+00:00): Änderung zurückgesetzt. Anonyme Hinweise, die offiziellen Karten widersprechen, sollten nicht auf Zuruf umgesetzt werden.
ALu68 (2023-02-09 18:22:36+00:00): Hello ilyessem,

"building"="public building" is not a common tag see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dpublic

Regards.
marczoutendijk (2023-02-17 10:24:49+00:00): Please correct the addr:* tags for the buildings in all your changesets as I asked you to do!

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
osmviborg (2023-02-09 14:55:39+00:00): Me 'd' tak https://vis.dataforsyningen.dk/stednavne2/1233766a-210b-6b98-e053-d480220a5a3f/Koldb%C3%A6k?format=json
Hoffet (2023-02-09 15:25:58+00:00): https://maps.apple.com/?ll=56.415221,9.371952&q=Anbragt%20knappen%C3%A5l&t=m
osmviborg (2023-02-09 15:32:22+00:00): Det danske stednavneregister er bestemmende.
osmviborg (2023-02-09 15:37:14+00:00): Er nu tagget med:
name=Koldbæk
loc_name=Kolbæk
marczoutendijk (2023-02-09 18:41:10+00:00): area=yes on a building is useless!
building=public_building isn't a recognised tag.
Almost all your address tags are in the wrong format!
What is the source of your "import"?
Read this:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:*
pyram (2023-02-27 06:34:34+00:00): Hi TDH WebSites,

something went wrong with that update.
That's Munich and not "Goiânia":

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10589103711/history

Best regards
pyram
habi (2023-02-09 22:36:19+00:00): Ciao gntrcspr

Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap!
Schön machst du hier mit und hilfst, die Karte und die Kartendaten zu pflegen.

Das Spielfeld mit Namen zu erfassen macht keinen Sinn, denn es ist schon korrekt mit `sport=soccer` erfasst.

Ä Gruess usem Liebifäud,
habi
Jordi MF (2023-02-16 22:44:32+00:00): He trasladado el nombre a la etiqueta "description" porque "caseta de pastor" no es ningún nombre oficial, sinó una descripción del elemento. Con amenity=shelter, ya se sabe que se trata de un refugio y, si es un antiguo refugio para pastores, lo mejor es describirlo en la etiqueta "descrition", no en la etiqueta "name".
IWBRABANT (2023-02-17 09:24:32+00:00): ok. Gracias.
redrace (2023-02-11 15:14:30+00:00): HUHU
Was häst Du davon den Node der Tankstelle in eine Fläche zu ändern? Landuse=industrial. name=shell usw.

Gruß Meik
pitfire (2023-02-12 07:36:42+00:00): Kann sowohl als auch:
Momentane Datenbankverteilung
[Node] 302 220=0.15%
[Way] 195 052=0.02%
Landuse=industrial.
eher nicht, ist kein produzierendes Gewerbe. Dann eher "landuse=commercial"
marczoutendijk (2023-02-09 18:50:56+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6851
marczoutendijk (2023-02-17 10:23:07+00:00): Please correct the addr:* tags for the buildings in all your changesets as I asked you to do!

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
PT-53 (2023-02-10 09:57:36+00:00): Hallo FvGordon,
echt super Deine schnelle Korrektur.

Wo bleibt da der Lerneffekt?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132272660#map=15/48.0747/9.5157

Fragende Grüße
eggie (2023-02-09 17:24:36+00:00): Beste Max..
Iets is alleen maar een fietspad als er een bord fietspad staat.
Dat is hier niet het geval.. Daarom had ik het aangepast naar highway=path..

Mvg
eggie
eggie (2023-02-10 18:56:31+00:00): Ik zie dat je er weer een fietspad van hebt gemaakt. Het zou zomaar kunnen als er een G11 zou staan, maar dat geeft je niet aan.
Wanneer dat er staat laat het even weten. Dan pas ik mijn edits weer aan.
MVG
eggie
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-10 11:11:56+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10632722995/history has barrier = obstacle that was added in this edit
What kind of barrier is here?

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:barrier for a typical values
bkil (2023-02-09 17:33:52+00:00): I would like to ask you about these deletions. We only map what is can be verified on the ground. It doesn't matter where a path leads to as long as it is useful for taking a shortcut or a detour in case of fallen trees. Private property should be fenced around to protect them.
István Karaszi (2023-02-09 18:01:28+00:00): Well, that sounds good but what comes first the chicken or the egg here?

This is not a beaten path and people are taking this because they think there is a path there because of this false information.

This isn't that these private properties are not fenced but their privacy is being violated because of the aforementioned reason.
bkil (2023-02-09 18:30:06+00:00): I understand that it should be inconvenient for you living there having to accommodate all us hikers who pass by. However, if you wish to enhance  your privacy, I recommend you erect a higher fence and one that is not see-through (either from planks, bricks or green leave-like visual cover). If you wish to close down paths, you need to consult with your local forestry. However, just deleting the paths that bother you are not helping much. The next hiker with a GPS will draw the same path again as long as it is passable.
István Karaszi (2023-02-10 08:30:08+00:00): First, you cannot erect a higher fence because it is a hilly part and would be 7+ meters high. Second, even if that would be possible to create such a wall the authorities prohibit a visually blocking wall, only a fence with plants would be possible, but that won't really fly in such a size. Third, this is not an official path, somebody decided to walk up here and then people were following them, so I cannot really see how the local forestry would help.
bkil (2023-02-10 10:19:43+00:00): Everyone has the right to hike in such public forests and you have no legal right to limit such right of theirs. On the other hand, the forestry could close down paths and cultivate vegetation on their trajectory. We only map what can be observed on the ground. As long as it can be observed on the ground, the path will be present on OSM. Hikers walking on the ground may also pay attention to their surroundings and disregard the map as well if they see a path in person that you have deleted. Also note that not every hiker is using OpenStreetMap. How about? https://www.obi.hu/bambusz-keritesek-nad-keritesek-gyekenyek/nadszoevet-natur-100-cm-x-600-cm/p/2384899 https://www.obi.hu/kerites-tartozekok-belatasgatlo-tartozekok/hdpe-belatast-gatlo-szalag-rugalmas-szoevet-zoeld-magassag-19-cm-hossz-205-m/p/3597234 https://www.mall.hu/arnyekolo/tectake-pvc-kerites-arnyekolo-szalag-100070965535
ivanbranco (2023-02-11 09:47:50+00:00): Ciao MarcoM, benvenuto su OSM

boundary=suolo_circoscrizione_2 et simili non sono valori documentati. Per convenzione i tag di OSM sono in inglese britannico. Dovresti leggere la wiki per il tag boundary per vedere se esiste un tag piu' appropriato tra quelli già documentati.

Buon mapping
MarcoM Bernardini (2023-02-15 10:01:08+00:00): Ciao ivanbranco, grazie per avermi fornito le indicazioni per il tag boundary. Provvedo a correggere.

Buon mapping
pangoSE (2023-02-14 15:37:00+00:00): Upptäckte den här ändringen när en av mina tester här felade efter att du tog bort dessa rutter. Se https://github.com/dpriskorn/hiking_trail_matcher
Vill du förklara varför du raderar data?
Se alla etapper här https://www.upplandsstiftelsen.se/upplandsleden/etapper__168
Skulle du vilja vara med och skapa etapper för de resterande sträckorna som verkar sakna etapprelationer och sen göra om den här relationen till en superroute med rutter som innehåll?
archie (2023-02-14 16:06:25+00:00): Vilka data har jag raderat?
archie (2023-02-14 19:28:18+00:00): Vill du vara vänlig att inte röra relationen samt därtill relaterade delar, tack.
Eftersom du inte kunnat eller velat svara på frågan vilka data jag har förstört (med att förstöra data avses enl vanligt språkbruk att data går förlorad och svårligen kan återskapas och den som står för förstörandet av data ringaktas vanligen för detta) har jag valt att anmäla det hela till DWG.
Jag får även be dig att underlåta att kontakta mig framöver på vilket sätt det än må vara, tack.
pangoSE (2023-02-15 14:04:13+00:00): Va? 
Om inte du inte tål att dina handlingar och i detta fall borttagande av barn i en relation skärskådas av andra och att frågor ställs så undrar jag om du mår bra? 

Om inte du vill prata om dina ändringar så föreslår jag att du avvaktar med flera ändringar tills du är ok med att svara på enkla frågor tex om varför du tar bort barn ut en relation som härovan.
Hur låter det? 

FYI så försökte jag sträcka ut en hand ovan och föreslå att vi tillsammans skulle skapa de resterande relationer som saknas för att den här leden ska bli komplett modellerad med en superrelation med barn som alla är relationer. 🤷‍♂️
Jordi MF (2023-02-16 22:41:36+00:00): Hola IWBRABANT,
Te escribo para explicarte por qué este no es el "Camino del Racó Puncho". Para empezar, el topónimo correcto es "Racó de Pitxer". Y, a continuación, este camino no desemboca en el Racó de Pitxer. Si te fijas, el camino que permite acceder al Racó de Pitxer es el siguiente: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/229161969

No sé qué fuente de datos estás usando, pero tiene un error que sigues trasladando a OpenStreetMap.

Un saludo,
Jordi
IWBRABANT (2023-02-17 09:21:55+00:00): Hola Jordy,
El nombre que le das al sendero que está al este del Rambla d'Estopet es correcto. El nombre de Puncho que puse es para otro sendero: el que está al oeste del Rambla d'Estopet. Y según los mapas que encontrarás en el siguiente enlace.
https://www.geamap.com/es/espana#zoom=15&lat=40.25549&lon=0.30232&layer=8&overlays=FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF
Un saludo,
Marc
Jordi MF (2023-02-17 14:42:57+00:00): Hola de nuevo,
Creo que es un error usar un mapa histórico del IGN para añadir información en OSM como si fuera información actual. Ese mapa es de principios del siglo XX. Además de que sabemos que, en el territorio valenciano, el IGN tiene muchos errores geográficos y ortográficos, en el mapa actual del IGN no existe ningún 'Racó de Punchó'. Mirando el mapa oficial de la Comunidad Valenciana com la toponímia oficial, aparece, cerca, el 'Racó de Pitxer'. La fonética es muy similar, por lo que es de esperar que el cartógrafo que escribió el nombre lo hiciese mal (porque no hablaba valenciano y lo tradujo mal al castellano). El nombre correcto es 'Pitxer' (en valenciano).

Podemos discutir de más topónimos, pero por favor, no uses mapa históricos. Usa el mapa más reciente del IGN o, mejor, el mapa oficial de la Comunitat Valenciana, que contiene la toponimia oficial de la Acadèmia Valenciana de la Llengua (de la que sí tenemos permiso).

Saludos,
Jordi
lnked (2023-02-12 02:09:00+00:00): As per request from DWG, changes of bike lanes into separate ways were discussed on US Slack. It was agreed these should continue to be mapped as cycleway=lane. Please reference https://osmus.slack.com/archives/C029HV951/p1675830878644039 and https://osmus.slack.com/archives/CKC0HGF4H/p1675915461514779
lnked (2023-02-12 02:09:21+00:00): As per request from DWG, changes of bike lanes into separate ways were discussed on US Slack. It was agreed these should continue to be mapped as cycleway=lane. Please reference https://osmus.slack.com/archives/C029HV951/p1675830878644039 and https://osmus.slack.com/archives/CKC0HGF4H/p1675915461514779
AgusQui (2024-08-22 22:44:32+00:00): Quedó pendiente este mapeo...
lnked (2023-02-12 02:11:00+00:00): As per request from DWG, changes of bike lanes into separate ways were discussed on US Slack. It was agreed these should continue to be mapped as cycleway=lane. Please reference https://osmus.slack.com/archives/C029HV951/p1675830878644039 and https://osmus.slack.com/archives/CKC0HGF4H/p1675915461514779
frozenrabi (2023-02-23 15:47:02+00:00): Hi Neism. Can you verify this power line is correctly mapped? If so, can you add transmission lines on the nodes where those transmission stations exist.
lnked (2023-02-12 02:11:03+00:00): As per request from DWG, changes of bike lanes into separate ways were discussed on US Slack. It was agreed these should continue to be mapped as cycleway=lane. Please reference https://osmus.slack.com/archives/C029HV951/p1675830878644039 and https://osmus.slack.com/archives/CKC0HGF4H/p1675915461514779
pyrog (2023-08-19 13:59:18+00:00): suppression du test :(
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132314401
lnked (2023-02-12 02:11:06+00:00): As per request from DWG, changes of bike lanes into separate ways were discussed on US Slack. It was agreed these should continue to be mapped as cycleway=lane. Please reference https://osmus.slack.com/archives/C029HV951/p1675830878644039 and https://osmus.slack.com/archives/CKC0HGF4H/p1675915461514779
martien-176 (2023-02-09 19:25:59+00:00): Hi, thanks for mapping. I am validating this project.

Unfortunately i found a few issues here.

Please avoid mapping several buildings as one building. Every building must be traced separately. 

Also please avoid buildings sharing nodes or else overlapping

This area contains several tall buildings where also part of the walls is visible. In that situation you should trace the roof outline and then move that outline to the building footprint. See for more info: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JAPiGntG6fs

The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. 

Thanks so much for your contribution, Martien, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132314541
literan (2023-02-09 18:37:34+00:00):  на дорогах не может быть луговая растительность (тем более, в аэропорту газон, который стригут). С таким уровнем детализации, тяп-ляп - пожалуйста, не надо.
lnked (2023-02-12 02:11:13+00:00): As per request from DWG, changes of bike lanes into separate ways were discussed on US Slack. It was agreed these should continue to be mapped as cycleway=lane. Please reference https://osmus.slack.com/archives/C029HV951/p1675830878644039 and https://osmus.slack.com/archives/CKC0HGF4H/p1675915461514779
muralito (2023-02-09 16:30:02+00:00): Mercado Willman no es fast food. Es food_court y ya estaba mapeado.
user_18386847 (2023-02-09 17:17:23+00:00): Soy nuevo en esto como puedo arreglarlo
muralito (2023-02-09 17:53:48+00:00): Para arreglar te conviene usar el editor ID, el del sitio web.
Los editores de apps de navegacion generalmente tienen poca funcionalidad.
muralito (2023-02-09 17:55:04+00:00): Bienvenido. No pasa nada por ser nuevo, cualquier error que hagas se puede revertir, o podes revisar mejor en el wiki.openstreetmap.org como mapear las cosas que te interesen.
muralito (2023-02-09 17:59:58+00:00): Ya lo borre. Aca es donde te decia que ya estaba mapeado.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/458761185

Hay una (de tantas) regla en OSM, que en ingles es "one feature, one element", traducido es que por cada cosa del mundo real, haya una sola mapeada en OSM (sin duplicados)
user_18386847 (2023-02-09 21:27:53+00:00): Gracias por el consejo si lo estoy editando lo mapas de Organic Maps
pangoSE (2023-02-15 23:35:17+00:00): vad tog du bort här?
muralito (2023-02-09 18:07:24+00:00): estas seguro que abre de lunes a domingo? tengo toda la impresion de que no...
user_18386847 (2023-02-09 21:23:24+00:00): Si por lo menos lo saqué de maps de Google
muralito (2023-02-09 23:42:32+00:00): Ojo, eso no se permite, esta específicamente prohibido por Google, y podría generarle problemas legales a OSM. Además en OSM se prioriza y se incentiva el mapeo local, el relevamiento de las cosas que conozcas en persona.
user_18386847 (2023-02-10 00:23:23+00:00): Perdón tabes no me expliqué bien cuando publique la información no hice referencia a Google, solo fui me fije los horarios y nada más ¿eso también está mal?
DaveF (2023-02-10 12:36:48+00:00): Why have you removed this kissing gate?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10562962453/history
ratrun (2023-02-10 14:28:17+00:00): I removed this one because it was there twice. See the remaining node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/453231102
DaveF (2023-02-10 14:38:19+00:00): Got you - Thanks.
4b696d (2023-02-16 19:57:58+00:00): Moin,
der Ortsverband Borna wird garantiert keine zwei Standorte haben. Woher nimmst du diese Info?
shogun (2023-02-17 06:02:43+00:00): Die Information ist das ich dort für das THW mit gebaut habe. Wann der Umzug dahin ist, weiß ich noch nicht. Der Bereich am Bahnhof ist zu klein, wurde mir gesagt.
4b696d (2023-02-17 06:51:12+00:00): Alles klar, dann nehme ich das erstmal wieder raus. OSM soll ja den Ist-Zustand abbilden und nicht die Zukunft parallel zur Gegenwart. Ich habe alle Dienststellen vom THW im Blick und werde das zeitnah anpassen, wenn der Umzug geschehen ist. Die Hausnummern 1-3 werden dann sicher auch nicht mehr auf beide Objekte zutreffen.
shogun (2023-02-17 09:36:50+00:00): Mit der Adresse ist von mir nicht angepasst, aber Herausnehmen weiß nicht, ob das richtig ist. Da sind schon welche am Arbeiten.
4b696d (2023-02-17 21:44:40+00:00): Dann ist der Umzug wahrscheinlich nicht mehr weit entfernt. Zwei Standorte gleichzeitig wird es aber nicht geben. Noch ist die neue Adresse nicht im Internet zu finden.
Mariusz189 (2023-02-11 20:25:13+00:00): Dlaczego teren szkoły oznaczyłeś jako "landuse=commercial" ? tam się uczą dzieci zdobywając średnie wykształcenie a nie pracują w biurze!