piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Kovoschiz (2025-07-19 14:53:08+00:00): Using uppercase simply amplify your mistake. To repeat what's mentioned, you have misunderstood what they mean. `highway=` is traditional British English meaning "public road", and is simply used for any road for legacy reasons. `=construction` means to be constructed, not roads for construction activities, nor necessarily existing already.
Tangot (2025-07-19 15:44:38+00:00): And, if you been to the site physically, or at least on  google map, you will see in no way there would be any future road being build there
Tangot (2025-07-19 16:28:13+00:00): well, even the satellite date is a year old before the major changes in this area, you would still see in no way there would be a plan for making a road between South Peri road and South RWY road
NorthCrab_upload (2025-07-17 09:51:32+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10032814509
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/419408487

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Abbymaria (2025-08-20 17:21:41+00:00): Hotel
jeslop (2025-07-22 14:14:38+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169296186
marmara_editor (2025-07-18 12:43:51+00:00): Personal info is reverted. | Eklenen kişisel bilgiler eski haline döndürüldü. Lütfen kişisel bilgi eklemeyin, burası kamuya açık bir platform.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169107661
jeslop (2025-07-22 14:17:28+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169296350
custodiankeyy (2025-07-17 21:25:54+00:00): OpenStreetMapte yaptığınız düzenlemeler herkese açıktır.  Lütfen kişisel bilgiler girmeyiniz.
custodiankeyy (2025-07-17 21:06:01+00:00): Merhaba, kocaman bir bölgeyi bina olarak haritalandırmışsınız. Lütfen etiketlere ve anlamlarına dikkat edelim. Geri alıyorum.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169080799
custodiankeyy (2025-07-17 20:16:29+00:00): Belirtilen bölge zaten sera, geri alıyorum.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169079334
uprkos (2025-07-18 21:48:39+00:00): Fontanna i woda pitna jednocześnie? To raczej mało prawdopodobne.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-07-17 10:30:58+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8336181540
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/896809593

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
jeslop (2025-07-22 14:17:51+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169296384
jeslop (2025-07-22 14:18:39+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169296424
jeslop (2025-07-22 14:18:54+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169296438
Anas masuris (2025-07-24 19:17:07+00:00): Wycofanie - plan pochodzi z 2015 r., nie odwzorowuje obecnego układu (ortofotomapa 2024) ani projektowanego (PZT) w ramach przebudowy LK201 na odc. Somonino - Kartuzy
Prusaker (2025-07-17 17:05:52+00:00): А зачем вы дублируете линии дорог поверх уже нарисованных? Так карта портится.
NeisBot (2025-07-17 10:57:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description
NeisReview (2025-07-20 05:33:43+00:00): Corrected by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169067811
pitscheplatsch (2025-07-23 07:15:03+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/169067811
jeslop (2025-07-22 14:20:17+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169296549
lumixen (2025-07-18 19:37:31+00:00): Вітаю, не знаю чи ти вандалиш навмисно, чи по незнанню, але наступного разу кину репорт з пруфами та фотками за видалення абсолютно валідних трейлів та стежок.
KKS (2025-07-18 21:34:31+00:00): А ти знаєш хто їх створив?
А ти знаєш хто їх наніс в осм?
А ти знаєш чого їх видалено?
lumixen (2025-07-18 21:47:40+00:00): Дивись, я здогадуюсь навіщо видалено частину трейлу (неналежне використання, скажімо так).
Але стара стежка на Мощун, яка вся в кропиві і там окрім пішоходів і деколи велосипедистів ніколи нікого не буває і вона вся поступово заростає? Ревертити зміни по старому видаленому і зовсім не актуальному роуту КК2013? 
Чи якісь дрібні кінні стежки? От навіщо було їх вандалити я не розумію.
І навіть з трейлом вандалінг мапи як би таке собі рішення, тим паче що частина тих стежок була прокладена грибниками.
KKS (2025-07-18 22:08:54+00:00): Ну от. Молодець. В 2+2=4 ти вмієш. То може ти вмієш і в подальшу логіку цього всього?

Кк2013 був? Був. Був і є такий маршрут? - є. Він зник? - ні.

В 2+2 ти навчився, а в 3+3 ще поки ні... :/

Які саме стежки були прокладені грибниками?
lumixen (2025-07-18 22:13:09+00:00): Добре, я зрозумів, будеш на репорті розказувати модератору по 3+3.
KKS (2025-07-18 22:20:29+00:00): Ясно, значить ту всю херню в лісі робиш ти. А я думав то все мотопідори
jbcharron (2025-12-02 17:01:13+00:00): Le commerce a déménagé dans le parking :)
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-07-24 03:39:25+00:00): I see that you mass edited landuse=farmland crop=rice to landuse=paddy crop=rice

have you discussed this mass edit as required? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct

It looks like a part of mass retagging, see https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/landuse=paddy#overview
aaei924 (2025-07-24 13:50:59+00:00): I have discussed in local community after this edit, and got some opinions that the mass edit was improper.
I reverted this mass edit in changeset below:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169400207
JAAS (2025-07-24 16:04:42+00:00): Hola fiorellaguillen,

Aparentemente la `Avenida Arica` sigue aún en construcción debido a la incorporación de la línea del Metro de Lima 2 en esa zona, por lo que estoy cambiando nuevamente la vía comprendida dentro del [área](https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1155859543) a `construction=*`. Es importante tener siempre estos datos lo más actualizados posible para que no sean afectadas negativamente las opciones de rutas a tomar - causando problemas potenciales a la navegación vehicular. Cuando sea oficialmente inaugurado de nuevo este tramo, podrá eliminarse todo lo indicativo a la construcción y quedar de nuevo habilitado para acceso de todos.

Saludos cordiales,
JAAS
anderfo (2025-08-19 13:00:16+00:00): stien står fortsatt kun med highway=path. prøv å legge inn mtb:scale=1 i tillegg.
wazabi (2025-08-21 10:13:47+00:00): Det (mtb:scale=1) ligger der nå så vidt jeg kan se
anderfo (2025-08-21 13:37:37+00:00): Stemmer! Det er fortsatt duplikat, de to vegene ser du i lista rett nedenfor min kommentar. Altså https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/370552727 (den gamle stien du gjerne kan beholde) og https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1415382711 (ny sti som du trolig har tegnet oppå den gamle, denne kan du slette).
bagis (2025-08-09 08:47:22+00:00): This change includes several keys "main" witch is not documented in the Wiki. Is this a misstake?
Lucas Liebler (2025-08-11 05:16:54+00:00): Hej!

Chansar på att du förstår svenska. Förskolorna i Kalmar är organiserade på ett sätt där det finns en "huvudförskola" där adminstration och så finns. Jag tänkte först använda bransch-taggen men den passade inte riktigt mitt syfte. Sen hade jag sett ett liknande exempel när en annan användare gjort på samma sätt. Men jag ska försöka hitta en mer lämplig tagg på wikin! Såvida du kanske inte har något förslag?
bagis (2025-08-11 06:38:25+00:00): Hej!

Tveksamt om det finns någon lämpligare tag. Kanske skulle gå att bygga någon relation, men känner inte till någon sådan typ som passar heller. Känns som lite onödig information om det inte finns något verktyg som tittar på det men det ligger nog en hel del sådant i OSM. Då vi säkerställt att det inte är ett misstag så har jag inga vidare invändningar.
gscholz (2026-03-04 06:53:53+00:00): Hi captive24,
your recent edit have left behind a huge amount of errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=92.86200&lat=56.02972&zoom=10&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges

As you may know, this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps. Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
anderfo (2025-08-19 13:06:03+00:00): Det ser ut som det er to stier oppå hverandre her. Den ene har du gitt mtb:scale=1+ (som blir blå, men antyder "vanskelig blå"), mens den andre stien ikke har noen mtb:scale. 
det er lurt å rydde litt opp for å unngå at det ligger flere stier oppå hverandre (da er det vanskelig å vite hva som skal tegnes på kartet, og det kan være tilfeldig hva som havner øverst). 

Og hvis du synes den bør være rød i et parti kan du evt. sette mtb:scale=2 der.
jeslop (2025-07-22 14:20:18+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169296549
Anders L (2026-06-05 18:43:31+00:00): Hi, I made this comment recently regarding this object: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5313338

In short, there is already a bay defined as a polygon, which is also correctly named "Helnæs Bugt". I think this object is redundant.
Aleks-Berlin (2026-06-06 18:35:56+00:00): I have no strong opinion here. but the wikidata tag should be available in the remaining one. or we make the node a member of the relation as role=label.
Alex
anderfo (2025-08-21 13:43:49+00:00): Tilsvarende som de andre stedene: Nedenfor kommentaren min her vil du se at det står listet opp 3 veier ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/605401525 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/605401531 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1415385710 ). 
De to første er gamle og inntegnet som kjerreveg, mens den siste er en ny du har tegnet som sti. 

Fjern den nye og legg heller inn flere tagger/egenskaper på de to gamle. Da blir det nok bra.
anderfo (2025-08-19 13:02:25+00:00): du har satt inn 
natural= "mtb:scale=0"

prøv å i stedet legge inn kun mtb:scale = 0 og fjerne natural-taggen (den brukes om noe annet)
wazabi (2025-08-21 10:09:28+00:00): Hmm?
Jeg finner ikke natural taggen der nå lenger.
Gregory Peony (2025-07-17 14:19:04+00:00): Overall you've improved the accuracy of the footprints in this changeset. Generally footprint size has been reduced so they no longer envelope the shadows cast by buildings. Beware that objects can shade themselves i.e. there are dark and light parts of roofs depending on their shape and sometimes the (shaded) wall of a building may be visible if the imagery is taken at an angle.--- you appropiately changed the shape of footprints from square to round. You did this by deleting and remapping the footprints but you can actually just select square buildings you think are round and press (o) to circularise them, then move (m) and scale [shift+(-/+)] them to make them accurate instead of mapping from scratch. The circularise function only requires a minimum of 3 nodes. You deleted some valid footprints here. I previously mapped some of these becasue they are likely buildings under construction. Thanks for your contribution.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169056989
Gregory Peony (2025-07-17 14:33:38+00:00): You correctly idenitified and deleted two invalid footpritns in the SE of this changeset. I agree that they did not represent buildings.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169056989
CAM-Gerlach (2026-05-28 02:04:46+00:00): Removed SEO spam description=* and used correct top-level tags for Prettify Creative in changeset 183281551

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183281551
gurglypipe (2025-07-17 16:04:34+00:00): This apartment block now has identical values for addr:housenumber and addr:flats, is that intentional?
Dezza (2025-07-17 19:30:21+00:00): Hello!

No. I meant to check on it when I got home actually as I thought I'd already numbered it the other day.

I've tagged it as nohousenumber=yes and kept addr:flats - hopefully that keeps Street Complete happy!

Thanks for the reminder!
gurglypipe (2025-07-17 22:09:04+00:00): I thought it would be something like that! Hope you’re well :)
Aim311_ (2026-07-05 21:40:19+00:00): Dlaczego zmieniłeś access=private na śmieciowy access=unknown skoro na drzwiach jest tabliczka że teren prywatny i przestroga żeby zawsze po sobie zamykać drzwi?
Aim311_ (2026-07-05 21:44:36+00:00): Widać wyraźnie że nie byłeś na miejscu i psujesz dane.
Mercanto123 (2026-07-06 05:02:24+00:00): Byłem, mieszkam obok :)
Aim311_ (2026-07-06 09:51:01+00:00): To skąd te błędne edycje?
Jedyna przejezdna dla ogółu droga przez te ogródki to al. Różna, której też dałeś access=unknown, ale twoja edycja została poprawiona przez innego edytora. W pozostałych przypadkach te drogo są niedostępne dla ogółu, a furtki zamknięte, dlatego access=private.
Mercanto123 (2026-07-06 10:15:15+00:00): Nie ma żadnych problemów, żeby wjechać albo wejść na wszystkie te alejki. Furtki nie są zamykane na klucz.
Piskvor (2025-07-17 12:11:25+00:00): Note the examples at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Demolished_railways - do not revive railways that no longer exist in terrain. Map follows OTG, not opposite.
Andrea Musuruane (2025-07-18 13:49:43+00:00): Già presente: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15967839. Rimuovo.
Leo Slager (2025-07-17 23:02:24+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
aharvey (2025-07-18 03:16:11+00:00): Thanks for spotting and fixing this!
AndresDuhour (2025-07-26 20:53:23+00:00): Buenas tardes! quería consultar por los cambios que has agregado. Parecen todos nodos sin etiqueta. En principio habría que eliminarlos  e intentar de nuevo con el aporte que querías  hacer. Luego, ver si se trataba de importar un conjunto de datos, porque eso en general está desaconsejado. Saludos!
Andrés
TatiPatense (2025-08-07 00:05:58+00:00): Estás seguro que esto era lo que querías hacer? Se añadieron un montón de puntos por todos lados que no apuntan a ningún lado. Supongo que querías delimitar las construcciones, pero en vez de importar los puntos como areas, simplemente se importaron como puntos.
Colbertson (2026-03-08 10:43:33+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179526831
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-05-28 02:08:46+00:00): Reverted added SEO spam relation and POI with no useful tags, just name=*

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183281619
jeslop (2025-07-22 14:22:15+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169296686
jeslop (2025-07-22 14:22:47+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169296720
literan (2025-07-17 19:34:58+00:00): зачем вы СНТ переломали? сделали из него одно огромное здание

внимательнее, пожалуйста. Откачу.
alekkalinin (2025-07-18 07:12:40+00:00): Прошу прощения, никогда этим не занимался, нужда заставила обозначить свой недавно приобретенный домик на карте, иначе доставка у соседних домов оставляет все товары. Попробую ещё раз 133 дом добавить тогда.
fndoder (2025-07-17 13:44:09+00:00): 1) В значении тега name должно быть только имя
2) Адрес сайта не должен включать utm-меток
3) В синтаксисе графика работы была ошибка, см. документацию https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours

Я исправил для этой точки.
jeslop (2025-07-22 14:23:00+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169296728
Sylabowy Kot (2025-07-17 14:54:38+00:00): Dlaczego oznaczyłeś nieformalne przejście przez ulicę akurat tutaj? Dodawanie wszelkich ścieżek w OSM rozwija systemy nagiwujące zależne od OSM, a widzę, że jako źródło nie podałeś wizji lokalnej, tylko mapy Esri oraz niedozwolone w OSM źródło, czyli GMaps, co kwalifikuje zmianę do wycofania.
Sylabowy Kot (2025-07-17 15:01:54+00:00): Jeśli kierowałeś się myślą, że to przejście w tym miejscu nie było by łamaniem przepisów - gdzie faktycznie jest powyżej 100m od najbliższego przejścia dla pieszych -  to nadal trochę za mało powodów, by tak robić.

Wg taginfo jest tylko 1288 jakiegokolwiek typu przejść dla pieszych o tagu informal=yes https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/informal=yes#combinations co stanowi teoretycznie 4 promile obiektów oznaczone tym drugim tagiem, więc przydały by się solidne podstawy do powiększania tej liczby.
jeslop (2025-07-22 14:23:15+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169296738
grzegorz75jan (2025-07-17 18:40:02+00:00): Już trochę fajniej tylko niemowa co trochę utrudnia i nie zachęca. 
Może gdy dorwę trochę czasu to przerobię to deko bo kiepsko to wygląda i brakuje paru rzeczy choć sam nie mam za bardzo pomysłu jakich fikuśnych znaczników użyć by oddawały charakter całości miejsca bo dwie takie same nazwy obok siebie to okrutnie wygląda.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169060952
jeslop (2025-07-22 14:24:18+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169296793
Comino (2025-07-17 18:27:57+00:00): Hi RADAMESH1234,

In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes".

Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag !
Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead.

For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Merchants#legacy-tags
and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bitcoin

Happy mapping,

Edwin
grzegorz75jan (2025-07-17 18:27:56+00:00): Już coś pisałem na temat opisów zmian oraz wysłałem odnośniki na ten temat. 

Mam wycofać wszystkie twoje zmiany z durnym opisem typu "dodałem" itp. ?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169062880
TrickyFoxy (2025-07-17 22:54:07+00:00): Здание снесли?
rempshaener (2025-07-17 18:48:22+00:00): Hallo,

du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Mir kam die Straße sehr bekannt vor, diese hat jemand vor dir schon einmal geändert, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158731305
Wenn das hier https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=697663468779327&lat=51.856541&lng=6.5905353000021&z=17&focus=photo noch aktuell ist, ist die Straße richtig ausgewiesen. Also mit „Anlieger frei“.
Was genau hattest du vor? Hat sich die Beschilderung geändert?

Viele Grüße
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-07-22 13:37:46+00:00): can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4869796 ?
literan (2025-07-17 19:16:55+00:00): не ошиблись в тегах? пешком нельзя, а машина перепрыгнет?)
zamotkin (2025-07-18 07:13:40+00:00): Ошибся конечно, спасибо!
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169093205
Oxeelix (2025-07-17 14:35:27+00:00): Firestation is currently disused as per http://www.fire-ireland.com/Roscommon-Fire-Service
Gregory Peony (2025-07-17 20:52:27+00:00): You identified a building in the imagery. The footprint is valid and accurate but should be squared. please watch this video for a demonstration https://youtu.be/Xs5wX592E1o?feature=shared --- It should then be moved NE to the base of the building. Here the Northern walls of buildings are visible due to the angle the imagery was taken at. See my project comment about using a secondary source to aid your interpretation. You're looking from above and using the roofs to obtain the building's shape but mapping the footprint. See how I mapped it in Changeset: 169080379 yes it looks a little weird but that footprint is now in an accurate position. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169064824
Gregory Peony (2025-07-17 21:00:14+00:00): The footprint you added here does not represent a building but rather a barrier like a fence or wall. Look at the way the shadows are cast. They're cast from both sides. cross reference Mapbox for a different view. I deleted this footprint. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169064870
custodiankeyy (2025-07-17 20:02:11+00:00): Merhaba, kaldırım etiketini kaldırmışsınız, geri aldım.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169078862
Gregory Peony (2025-07-17 21:08:13+00:00): The Northern footprint represents a building the Southern one does not. The Northern footprint is oversized becasue part of the building's shadow was included in its shape. Also jsut becasue there are fields available in the tagging preset doesn't mean you have to fill them all in. You tagged the flagged footprint as having 0 levels which would indicate it either isn't a building or it has collapsed. Building=yes is sufficient; it is rare/more difficult to extract more information from aerial imagery alone. Only add extra tags if you're confident that the information is correct. I deleted the southern footprint and modified the Northern one. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169065146
Gregory Peony (2025-07-17 21:18:28+00:00): The highway you added does not appear secondary to me: it would be more accurately tagged as unclassified. Secondary highways connect large towns to cities. This highway connects a hamlet to the highway network. Connected highways need to share common (grey) nodes in order to be considered connected and for routing to function properly. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169065700
Gregory Peony (2025-07-17 21:33:04+00:00): Just out of curiosity, why did you tag this as a secondary highway? Check out this page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa before tagging more highways. Thanks for your contribution.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169065797
custodiankeyy (2025-07-17 20:52:47+00:00): Lütfen geçmişi olan elementleri silip tekrar oluşturmayın. Onun yerine elementin etiketlerini değiştirin.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history
custodiankeyy (2025-07-17 20:59:27+00:00): Ayrıca artık orası "Yaya öncelikli yol" mu? Araç maksimum hız limiti 20 mi? Neden living_street yaptınız orayı?
mahmut Akk (2025-07-17 21:37:34+00:00): kusura bakmayın yanlışlıkla yaya öncelikli yol olarak işaretlemişim şimdi düzenledim. geri bildiriminiz için çok teşekkür ederim
custodiankeyy (2025-07-18 00:33:28+00:00): Ben teşekkür ederim. Ancak lütfen bundan sonraki haritalandırmalarda eski elementleri silip tekrar haritalandırmaktan kaçının (Mümkün olduğunca elementin geçmişini koruyun.).

Mutlu haritalandırmalar.