piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
hlfan (2024-05-30 07:39:35+00:00): Servus!
Wie weit soll die Autobahn noch gezogen werden? Ich war mir ja nicht ganz sicher, weil die ja eigentlich mit dem Zeichen 331.1 aufhört, das auf https://mapillary.com/app?pKey=635217755152950 zu sehen ist.
Aber als Österreicher möchte ich dazu dennoch eine deutsche Meinung dazu hören.
GuyFrom2007 (2024-05-30 07:48:22+00:00): Ich hätte halt gedacht, dass die Autobahn noch bis zur Landesgrenze gezogen wird. In Deutschland hat eigentlich jede Straße mit einer A - Nummer (Straßennummer mit einem A vorne dran) den Wert Motorway (bitte nicht vergleichen mit den Landesstraßen im Landkreis Augsburg). Habe in Deutschland bisher noch keine Straße, die ein A vorne dran hat, als trunk (Schnellstraße) gesehen. In Österreich habe ich das natürlich schon mal gesehen, dass eine Straße mit einem A vorne dran den Wert trunk hat, aber halt nicht in Deutschland.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen
hlfan (2024-05-31 08:33:42+00:00): Die Straßennummern werden sicher bis zur Landesgrenze gezogen, das ist ja nicht weiter beschildert, der Autobahnrang hingegen schon.
Dass Autobahnen Kraftfahrstraßenrang haben, kommt ja auch öfters vor. Davon gibt’s laut Abfrage in https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1MhV ein paar Abschnitte in Baden-Württemberg und Rheinland-Pfalz. Wie es auch bei der A5 nahe der Ö/CZ-Grenze der Fall ist.
Aber dass wie hier eine Kraftfahrstraße als highway=motorway kartiert wird, ist mir aber hier das erste Mal untergekommen.

Freundliche Grüße
Fraxi (2024-05-18 20:09:41+00:00): Използвана снимка от 24.08.2023 г.
lankapuhelin (2025-03-07 20:30:26+00:00): Hi, I believe there is no basis for access=no on this road. Access tags describe the legality of access, and Finnish law is very lax for foot/bicycle access. It cannot be denied without a good cause. I cannot see any house yards that this road passes through, for example.
Motor_vehicle=no is possible, if (official) signage exists.
Friendly_Ghost (2024-05-29 17:12:50+00:00): Hi. I have reverted your edit in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151999194. 

Please do not translate your news feed into OSM mapping. OSM is not a place to follow active conflicts in real-time.
hoserab (2024-05-23 20:25:23+00:00): lane_markings=no?

Maybe I'm not clear on what that tagging means, but if there's a yellow centreline up the middle of this road—which I can tell you is absolutely the case, just from looking out a window from where I'm at right this very second—does that not mean there *are* "lane_markings"? I thought "lane_markings=no is meant for where there are no markings whatsoever.
Airfall (2024-05-23 20:54:04+00:00): Yes! I recently walked this area on foot and there are no lane markings. The satellite photo on the edit screen shows lines so perhaps the lines just need to be repainted as they have faded.
Airfall (2024-05-23 20:57:01+00:00): Oh perhaps I miscklicked the wrong road
Airfall (2024-05-23 20:58:42+00:00): Thanks for checking my work! I'll be more careful using the street complete in the future!
Airfall (2024-05-23 21:03:57+00:00): And fixed! Thank you for noticing that so quickly! It's nice to know that people are checking my edits so I don't mess up.
bportlp98 (2024-05-18 22:13:22+00:00): Buenas, sin ser yo un experto me gustaría entender el por qué del cambio. Tanto este como el de plaza maior. Según https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:place%3Dsquare entiendo que plaza civica puede ser un nodo y delimitar la zona característica como área peatonal. Un saludo y gracias!
Rodrigo Rega (2024-05-18 22:57:30+00:00): Buenas. place=square en el área me parece que describe más concretamente la realidad. Además de ahorrar el tener un nodo extra para indicar que hay una plaza. Por otra parte, place=square permite aglutinar todo dentro de un área sencilla, sin tener que hacer multipolígonos para excluir del area elementos sobre los que no se puede transitar (por ejemplo fuentes o césped). En mi cabeza el usar "area=yes+highway=pedestrian" es el modo antiguo, lo que se usaba antes de que se aprobase "place=square", por eso me da un poco de grima ver ese tipo de mapeado. No creo que tu edición fuese incorrecta, si sigues pensando que estaba mejor antes de mi edición, no tengo nada en contra de que hagas revert de mi cambio. Gracias por tus aportaciones al mapa ¡buen trabajo!. Un saludo.
bportlp98 (2024-05-19 09:36:50+00:00): Hola, Por mi parte ok. Estaba un poco engañado porque en Vigo (donde resido habitualmente) me había fijado que suelen estar así casos similares y además pensaba que por ser área peatonal ya era enrutable por un software de navegación pero ya he visto que necesita su correspondiente "highway=pedestrian" igualmente. Yo lo había detallado bastante con sus escaleras y muros pero siendo así quizá es mejor extender "place=square" tambien a la zona contigua, ya que pertenece a esa plaza.
Un saludo.
gpserror (2024-09-02 14:07:59+00:00): I noticed you added protected bike lanes.  However the main street has bike tagging - since you added the bike lanes, the street tagging now needs to have bicycle access removed.  Is this what you want?
atticquilt (2024-09-02 22:25:03+00:00): Sure, go for it. The parking protected bike lanes are separate geometries there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:15:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:21:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:17:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:20:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:12:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
Glassman (2024-05-22 16:18:43+00:00): It looks like you accidentally dragged a node. Fixed. If you need help just ask. I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151511953
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:14:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
ftrebien (2024-05-19 16:40:38+00:00): Inserção de dados falsos é vandalismo. Marquei esse changeset como tal e estou monitorando o seu usuário.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:24:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
JassKurn (2024-05-19 14:35:05+00:00): Hi UKDiver

You've edited the addr:housename key to provide info the business is closed.

The addr:housename key can not be used in that way. It's agreed that in the UK the addr:* keys are strictly for the recognised address elements.

There's (a rather long) guide on UK address tagging linked below

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses_in_the_United_Kingdom

The name key is a  better location for info. Many would state the information should be under the description key.

Jass
gardenBiker (2024-05-18 21:14:58+00:00): Ой, СНТ Дружба
silversurfer83 (2024-05-18 22:21:07+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap :)

danke, dass du hilfst die Karte aktuell zu halten.

Kleiner Hinweis: Die Details zum Netto waren schon ausführlicher am Gebäude erfasst. Bin zwar ein Freund davon POIs in eigenen Punkten zu erfassen, aber eine Doppelung ist unnötig :)
Habe deinen Punkt (node) also wieder entfernt.

Der Rest sieht schon ganz gut und korrekt aus. 

Bei Fragen einfach mal ins Wiki (wiki.osm.org) schauen oder fragen 

happy mapping
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151512250
silversurfer83 (2024-05-18 22:24:11+00:00): https://osmcha.org/changesets/151513578

meine Variante ;)
Du hattest immernoch einen Punkt, an dem Bach und Weg verbunden waren. Diese Verbindung hab ich entfernt.

(ist da wirklich ein Bach? Luftbild und LIegenschaftskarte geben nichts her, aber das muss nichts bedeuten)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151512257
Vivek Dumre (2024-05-25 05:46:45+00:00): Thank you for mapping. The mapping looks great and also the changeset comment. Happy Mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151512343
felipeeugenio (2024-05-18 23:43:55+00:00): Hola. El colegio ya estaba. Ahora hay que eliminarlo
felipeeugenio (2024-05-19 00:42:36+00:00): Hola
Las Escuelas son =school, no =college. Son conceptos muy distintos
MxxCon (2024-05-20 06:28:42+00:00): Hello.
When mapping landuse areas, they should not be glued to the nearby roads but rather be mapped to their actual shape.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151512795
grzegorz75jan (2025-11-16 13:43:19+00:00): Czy ta ścieżka https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1219288133 na pewno powinna mieć access=no 

https://tarnow.naszemiasto.pl/tajemnicze-fortyfikacje-obronne-niedaleko-tarnowa-czym-byly-okopy-szwedzkie-i-jaka-zagadke-skrywa-to-niezwykle-miejsce/ar/c1p2-28175955
uprkos (2025-11-16 14:11:28+00:00): Niestety, nie pamiętam już szczegółów, ale access=no daję tylko gdy jest wyraźna informacja o zakazie wejścia. Musiał tam być jakiś tego typu komunikat (na ile egzekwowany, to oczywiście inna sprawa).
grzegorz75jan (2025-11-16 18:07:59+00:00): To być może zakaz pojawił się okazjonalnie bo wszystko co znalazłem w sieci raczej wskazuje na swobodny dostęp (zero zdjęć, wpisów wskazujących na zakaz wstępu) a dostępne materiały pokazywały tylko tablice informacyjne. 
Brałem też pod uwagę jakiś błąd przy edycji bo się zdarza.

Napisałem też do gościa który dodał tu ruiny zamku bo o zamku mało co wiadomo oprócz praktycznie domysłów, że może był a nazwa to już kompletnie.
grzegorz75jan (2025-11-17 07:55:39+00:00): Możesz mieć rację choć nie do końca
https://www.hejto.pl/wpis/krotki-wypad-w-szwedzkie-okopy-ktore-mozliwe-ze-jednak-nie-sa-szwedzkie-bren-nie

Tekst z odnośnika nie precyzuje czy nie można wejść w obręb wewnętrzny obiektu czy tylko do tych podziemi.
Ogólnie pogmatwany (nazwa i czym to faktycznie było) i edycyjnie niedorobiony obiekt.
uprkos (2025-11-17 23:03:26+00:00): Obstawiam, że było tam coś w stylu 'Teren niebezpieczny, wstęp wzbroniony', co ustawiła gmina jako typowy dupochron w razie gdyby ktoś sobie tam złamał nogę. Zakazu zapewne nikt nie przestrzega, ale ja gorliwie naniosłem. Będę w tych okolicach w weekend, jak mi się uda, to zajadę i sprawdzę.
grzegorz75jan (2025-11-17 23:14:34+00:00): Dziś tzn. wczoraj spędziłem trochę na telefonie. Wiele się nie dowiedziałem ale mam kolejne kontakty.  Urzędach czy Sołtys mało co wiedzą a Stowarzyszenie Powiśle Dąbrowskie było wręcz zaskoczeniem. 

Prawdopodobnie w terenie trawiastym coś kombinowali myśliwi z kukurydzą a podziemia prawdopodobnie mogą komuś walnąć cegłą lub sufitem w dyńkę
https://youtu.be/y6jUD_7DcCI?t=331
więc taśmy jako dupochron kazamatów a ogrodzenie na sarny i dziki.
gr4yweb (2024-05-18 21:47:25+00:00): Kurze Erklärung hier warum ich diesen Briefkasten eingetragen habe: Die Hausnummer 17 ist sehr weit eingerückt und der Briefkasten steht direkt an der Straße und zwischen Haus und Briefkasten ist nur ein schmaler eingezäunter Weg. 

Ich habe mir zwar das Wiki durchgelesen, war mir nicht sicher ob das eine gute Idee ist und freue mich auf Feedback nach der Prüfung dieser Änderung. Vielen Dank
felipeeugenio (2024-05-19 00:52:53+00:00): HOla. En addr:street agregar el nimbre de la calle que corresponde, no una descripción de cómo llegar.
OddBunsen (2024-05-18 22:10:59+00:00): Why did you include emojis? Is it part of the official name?
Jose Luis Infante (2024-05-18 23:27:35+00:00): Hola,
gràcies per la teva aportació. Només un apunt sobre l'etiqueta access=no. Això significa que no es pot accedir a la via de cap manera (vehicle, caminant, etc). Si pots, treu aquesta etiqueta, ja que entra en contradicció amb la resta (foot, bicycle, motor_vehicle,...)
Salutacions!
Jose Luis Infante (2024-05-18 23:31:18+00:00): Hola,
si pots, afegeix un comentari als canvis que indiquin quin tipus de canvi has fet o que elements has modificat. "Complimentar informació del lloc" és massa genèric i pels altres usuaris no aporta informació.
Salutacions!
AngelCañellas (2024-05-19 07:44:51+00:00): Fet, moltes gràcies per indicar-me l'error.
Jan Olieslagers (2024-05-19 10:04:14+00:00): Caro Rui,
I hope and trust you are not too much upset when I reverted your change to the out area of Ovar Air Base. You may wish to refer to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Aeroways#Traps_to_avoid
Also, be aware that maproulette is not moderated, anybody can post their personal whims there without realising the consequences! Generally, one should think twice before entering upon a request in maproulette.
Kindly from Ansião!
Glassman (2024-05-22 16:22:11+00:00): The building already has an address. It not necessary to show one for the garage entrance. Also, entrances should be tagged as entrance= 

Can you fix this edit?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151513752
felipeeugenio (2024-05-18 23:45:01+00:00): Por favor cuidar la ortografía. 
Gracias
NeisBot (2024-05-18 22:35:02+00:00): Hi Rob2k9, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1284513390

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
AR_Mapper (2024-05-19 10:53:13+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151528562
Glassman (2024-05-22 16:23:04+00:00): Instead of adding an address node to the street, just add a driveway from the street to the building.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151513869
Vivek Dumre (2024-05-25 05:39:47+00:00): Your mapping looks good and accurate.#OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151513870
Vivek Dumre (2024-05-25 05:32:01+00:00): Good and accurate mapping.#OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151514045
Vivek Dumre (2024-05-25 06:18:53+00:00): Mapping looks good but the accuracy of building shape can be improved. Thank you #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151514175
danieldegroot2 (2024-05-25 13:43:42+00:00): Hey Vivek Dumre,

Thank you for taking your time to review changesets for your open mapping hub's program.

I would recommend you focus on 'New mapper' changesets, especially those with 'Review requested' label.
You can also use the 'Filters' => 'Reasons for Flagging' to get only these changesets, or use the 'Location' filter to get only changesets in a certain area. i.e. it may be useful to look only at the area which is the focus of your open mapping hub, where you have the most experience. Local mapping guidelines elsewhere may differ from what you are used to.

You're welcome to review more experienced mappers' changesets, though try to avoid reviewing multiple by the same user in this case, unless reviewing as bad. Also, some users do not like such 'thank you for mapping' messages as they may appear copy-pasted and do not contain any feedback on how to improve mapping, which may be wasting your and/or the users' time.
Though, your comment otherwise looks fine of course.

In the future, try to link to the objects in question and try to explain how to resolve the issue, please. (at least one or two good examples.)
Here, I don't know what you were refering to. It could be
I.e. The building
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/156354822/history
is slightly too large, is not rotated correctly, has an extension...
Have since modified both buildings from this changeset. Noteably, it is not the first version of the building outlines and the geometry did not change even slightly -which may happen if I add a building part and square the full object-. See OSMCha preview or
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=151514175
There was only a roof building part added and some empty nodes -by accident- which were left over from aligning the POI nodes.
It is unlikely to be relevant to discuss the geometry of the existing building with a mapper who only added a building part or modified the POIs. (besides, building parts are usually only added by experienced users.)

For geometry issues, it is important to mention what imagery you are using. The recommended imagery may differ in other locations than you are used to and layers such as Esri and Esri Clarity are only available in editor applications. They are *not* available from OSMCha.

Sidenote: areas such as this where the sides of buildings are visible in aerial imagery (or where they are on a slope) may have an offset applied to some objects to match their footprint. Also, some street level imagery and GPS traces may have been aligned to existing (old) mapping by the application (or are simply too poor), therefore can not be used to determine the precise location of objects.
This may not be directly useful to you as reviewer but it helps to understand why some objects may be at a (seemingly) incorrect position.

Regards,

Daniel
Vivek Dumre (2024-05-25 14:07:29+00:00): Thank you, Daniel, for your valuable suggestion. I will definitely follow it next time.
Vivek Dumre (2024-05-25 04:51:39+00:00): Good and accurate mapping.#OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151514289
DD1GJ (2024-05-19 16:33:16+00:00): Ein Strand mitten im Wohngebiet? Deine "Strände" wurden gelöscht.

https://pokemon-go-forum.de/threads/pokemon-go-spieler-zerstoeren-open-streetmaps.3160/
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-08-28 15:50:17+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11916722955/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
pitfire (2024-05-19 05:01:19+00:00): Hi  Baumschrat,
der barrier=fence ist auf der Stützmauer montiert und somit ebenerdig und überlagert keine  (Wegen, Knoten oder Flächen)
Also ohne Key:layer!

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=50.982889831113994&lng=7.075926465920247&z=19.9&pKey=157430266338356&focus=photo
VG
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-10 06:13:49+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11916833458/history has shop = boutique that was added in this edit
shop=boutique? Is it shop selling clothes? Then maybe shop=clothes would fit well, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=clothes

Or maybe shop=fashion_accessories ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=fashion_accessories ) would fit better? Or shop=bag ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=bag ) ?

Or is it some completely different type of shop, with tag used as "boutique" is French word for shop? In such case see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop for some documented values.

For shop=boutique info see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=boutique page
Martin Constantino–Bodin (2026-02-10 08:38:06+00:00): Thanks. Indeed, Vespucci suggested this key, but shop=clothes + clothes=luxury would be much more adequate.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-10 08:42:33+00:00): Thanks! I opened https://github.com/simonpoole/beautified-JOSM-preset/issues/515
PennyLane97 (2024-05-18 23:49:15+00:00): True
DorneyLake123 (2024-05-19 00:00:07+00:00): Some of these are already tagged in the correct location. "hill-bagging.co.uk" likely has incorrect locations
flex16 (2025-03-30 11:35:58+00:00): Wie kamst du eigentlich mal dazu, in der Bahnhofstraße oben beim Bahnhof in Fulda taxi=yes einzutragen? Die dürfen da doch gar nicht reinfahren. :)
flex16 (2025-03-30 11:42:19+00:00): Oder war das früher mal erlaubt? Glaube heute ist es das nicht mehr.
greenie11 (2025-03-30 14:41:38+00:00): Es war früher erlaubt, aber mittlerweile nicht mehr. Ich hatte nicht daran gedacht, den Tag taxi=yes zu entfernen.
VictorIE (2024-05-25 10:40:05+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1137649603
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1137649605

These buildings are shown as overlapping.
MapMenMan (2024-05-25 22:12:17+00:00): I believe the overlapping part is a stairwell of the student accomodation, not connected to the tesco express underneath, though the building kind of wraps around it. I am unsure of how to my it so feel free to simplify it or make it more precise
gpserror (2024-05-19 16:01:00+00:00): TBH I think this isn't such a big deal though prefer it's more than just one structure.  Yeah it would be nice it was public (i.e. not access=private) but it is still a playground and it's on the ground, so it gets mapped just like a private road.
TehHillsider (2024-05-24 00:00:48+00:00): Get some help
Supaplex (2024-05-20 03:34:37+00:00): Hi _Err0r_

The OpenStreetMap project is a collaborative project that is powered by volunteers around the world. Adding stuff not exist in the real world or even gaming the system, for example, mapping for Pokemon Go is not allowed. Stop the action.
FYR: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

Dennis Raylin Chen
Data Working Group
data@osmfoundation.org
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151516774
NeisBot (2024-05-19 02:05:20+00:00): Hi foxworth22, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature's:
https://osm.org/way/1284541347
https://osm.org/way/1284541348
https://osm.org/way/1284541351

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-21 17:24:02+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/151522092
https://osm.org/changeset/151522179
https://osm.org/changeset/151522189