piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
enzo_immergis (2026-05-07 13:57:29+00:00): Merci pour ton retour rapide, l'idéal serait donc de ne pas modifier lorsque c'est déjà en "highway=path" ? 

Et pour info, cette utilisation date de mon apprentissage en Normandie :p 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/229084333/history/11
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/537260429/history/11
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/866899294/history/8
...

D'ailleurs, d'autres pros de la Fédé utilisent aussi cette combinaison : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/France/Accessibilite_pieton_Caen_la_mer#Chemins_partag%C3%A9s_avec_les_v%C3%A9los
enzo_immergis (2026-05-27 20:54:49+00:00): Salut Simon ou Pierre,
Est-il possible de faire machine arrière et de repasser les chemins en 'highway=path' ? 
Merci
NeisBot (2026-04-09 15:12:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13718842180 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Photo studio"
---
Örneğin metnin daha tarafsız ve gerçek bir versiyonu şöyle olabilir: "Foto stüdyosu"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-17 16:33:27+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181467482
(Delete spam tags. First version)
NeisBot (2026-04-09 15:12:46+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13682040377 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Casino building"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-17 16:33:30+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181467485
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
NeisAgent (2026-04-09 16:33:48+00:00): 🕵 The changeset tags appear to reference Google as a data source.

Please note that using Google Maps, Google Street View, or similar Google services as a mapping source is not allowed in OpenStreetMap due to license restrictions.

More information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google

If the data in this changeset was derived from Google or another incompatible source, the edits may need to be reverted.

If this is a misunderstanding and the data was collected from permitted sources (e.g. local survey, Bing imagery, local knowledge, etc.), please clarify in a reply.
java_c (2026-04-09 16:42:07+00:00): Its a misundertanding, it's a local observation, I didn't used google as source, just as additional verfication.
felipeeugenio (2026-04-09 18:38:56+00:00): Hola. No mapeamos eventos curcunstanciales. 

Y no hay evidencia de un bosque de ese tamaño en esa zona.

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181103173
Nicolás toro (2026-04-09 19:28:35+00:00): Bro solo era una tarea relax
Kamil Kalata (2026-04-11 09:29:29+00:00): Witaj!
To, że droga krajowa nr 12 przebiega ulicą Łódzką, nie oznacza, że musi ta droga być oznaczona highway=primary, zwłaszcza że ta kategoria drogi (w rozumieniu OSM) została przyznana Szlakowi Bursztynowemu. Więcej na ten temat na wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Znakowanie_dróg_w_Polsce.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-04-15 04:52:30+00:00): patrz też https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181348160 i https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181277157
Dimitar155 (2026-04-09 15:43:29+00:00): Merci, it looks great!
Lyokoï (2026-04-09 18:43:33+00:00): With pleasure ! :D
Lokai (2026-04-12 07:05:04+00:00): Hallo,
das Gebäude auf dem Gartengemüsegelände Weierhöfer ist nicht rechtwinklig. Das kann man mit der Taste Q bewerkstelligen.

 Ausführlichere Kommentare wären gut.

Gruß
L.
renminbo (2026-04-12 09:32:20+00:00): Das mit der Taste wusste ich nicht - danke. Die Kommentare: ist völlig richtig, "Div" sagt gar nichts. Aber nach 15 Änderungen fiel mir nichts mehr ein.
OSMaper_xD (2026-04-09 16:57:27+00:00): Dziękuje, przepraszam za przeoczone błędy
eggie (2026-04-09 15:35:17+00:00): Welcome to OSM,

I merged the info with the present addressnode.
Greezt,
eggie
Dimitar155 (2026-04-16 05:46:51+00:00): Здравей Спас,

Моля не обединявай точки за квартали с техния жилищен полигон. Това са два отделни обекта.
Поздрави,
Митко

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181395666
Spas_Kolev (2026-04-16 07:23:40+00:00): Добре (дано не забравя, че рядко правя такива неща :) ), но връзката към Уикиданни не трябва ли да е в контура? Така може да се генерира и карта с границата в Уикипедия.
Dimitar155 (2026-04-16 08:01:26+00:00): Този контур е landuse=residential, т.е. жилищна площ. То определя земеползването, а не границите на квартала или населеното място.

Контура за квартала следва да е релация. Такива релации правихме в София преди 1-2 години (примерно relation/16858617).
NeisBot (2026-04-09 15:36:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13672232825 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Greek restaurant"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-17 16:33:33+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181467487
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
Frank Peng (2026-04-10 03:10:41+00:00): Please make sure to modify the geometry of existing OSM elements instead of deleting them and redrawing them anew. It helps preserve their editing history on OSM.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history

You deleted a natural=water way and remapped it as a multipolygon relation in this changeset, when you could've copied and removed the tags on the existing natural=water way that you deleted and created a new natural=water multipolygon relation, pasted the deleted way's tags to the multiplygon relation, and added the way to it.
I see that you deleted an existing driveway and remapped it anew in this changeset, when it would've been better to modify the geometry of the existing driveway you deleted. By just modifying the geometry of the existing OSM elements instead on deleting them and redrawing them anew, you help preserve the history on OSM.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181104566
BeaconOSM (2026-04-10 04:57:58+00:00): No new waterways were created. Redundant and un-necessary user waterways existed.
BeaconOSM (2026-04-10 04:59:11+00:00): The only objects I ever remove are nonexistant or extraneous objects. I reuse objects when available. Please review the edit more specifically.
Frank Peng (2026-05-10 00:49:53+00:00): You should reuse every existing map object, even if it's out of alignment or its geometry doesn't match that in aerial imagery, instead of deleting them and remapping them anew. Just modify the geometry of existing map objects to help preserve their editing history. For more information, see this OSM Wiki article: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history
Frank Peng (2026-06-25 05:03:14+00:00): > No new waterways were created. Redundant and un-necessary user waterways existed.

I know you did not create any new waterways in this changeset. I was referring to the natural=water way you deleted and remapped as a multipolygon in this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37533324/history and https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20427169. You could've just modified the geometry of the natural=water way that you deleted in this changeset (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37533324/history) to align with its current geometry seen in aerial imagery. That would've helped preserve its editing history on OSM. How come it was "redundant and un-necessary"?

> The only objects I ever remove are nonexistant or extraneous objects. I reuse objects when available. Please review the edit more specifically.

I see here that you deleted a driveway (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/821682435/history) and remapped it anew in this changeset (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1497982926). You could've just modified the geometry of the driveway you deleted to match its geometry shown in aerial imagery. That would've helped preserve its editing history on OSM. What do you mean by "reuse objects when available"? Where in this edit should I review more specifically?
iandees (2026-04-09 16:13:43+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11901929074 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181106008, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
IvaKraljić (2026-04-09 16:55:52+00:00): The wrong tag has since been fixed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181108024#map=19/40.597490/-75.480791. #OptimoRoute
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-09 17:07:52+00:00): Hi Rocio Ayelen, welcome to OSM.

Could you share more context or a source for changing this residential road name from "Cuellar Dávalos" to "Casa"? "Casa" seems very generic for a street name, so a reference would help verify whether this is really the correct full name.

Thanks.
IvaKraljić (2026-04-09 16:57:50+00:00): The wrong tag has since been fixed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181108160#map=18/40.558492/-75.489354. #OptimoRoute
NeisBot (2026-04-09 16:00:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13703875833 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Clothing store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-17 16:33:35+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181467491
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
VictorIE (2026-04-14 01:04:54+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1497988000/

Could you take a look at the street addresses here?

1 Millbrook Walk is mapped on Millbrook Road, near the corner of Roseville Park. :)

The red parts on this page: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=addresses&lon=-6.03435&lat=54.51337&zoom=17&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=buildings%2Cbuildings_with_addresses%2Cpostal_code%2Centrances_deprecated%2Centrances%2Cno_addr_street%2Cstreet_not_found%2Cplace_not_found%2Cmisformatted_housenumber_lenient%2Cnodes_with_addresses_defined%2Cnodes_with_addresses_interpolated%2Cinterpolation%2Cinterpolation_errors%2Cconnection_lines%2Cnearest_points%2Cnearest_roads%2Cnearest_areas%2Caddrx_on_nonclosed_way%2Cbuildings%2Cbuildings_with_addresses%2Cpostal_code%2Centrances_deprecated%2Centrances%2Cno_addr_street%2Cstreet_not_found%2Cplace_not_found%2Cmisformatted_housenumber_lenient%2Cnodes_with_addresses_defined%2Cnodes_with_addresses_interpolated%2Cinterpolation%2Cinterpolation_errors%2Cconnection_lines%2Cnearest_points%2Cnearest_roads%2Cnearest_areas%2Caddrx_on_nonclosed_way might help.
NeisBot (2026-04-09 16:15:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13717220744 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Aveda salon"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-17 16:33:38+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181467496
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
woodpeck_repair (2026-04-09 16:48:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 181107666 where the changeset comment is: revert removal of 'illegal' trails, please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F
IvaKraljić (2026-04-09 16:59:33+00:00): The wrong tag has since been fixed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181108251#map=17/40.584800/-75.512478. #OptimoRoute
flohoff (2026-04-10 06:37:23+00:00): Moin ,
nur weil ich es mal wieder sehe.

foot=designated/bicycle=designated ist IMHO nur bei wirklich für diesen zweck beschilderten wegen zu benutzen. D.h. Z240 ff. und nicht bei allem was wohl für Fußgänger/Radfahrer zu benutzen sein könnte.

Flo
Yog Sot (2026-04-09 22:51:25+00:00): rondo pod chato mi mapujesz? ;d
ta trójkątna wysepka jest troche skomplikowana. Moze będa jakies zdjęcia z drona to sie to moze wtedy zmapuje.
db-ak (2026-04-09 22:57:27+00:00): Ponad tydzień czekałem aż ktoś coś xd
To w końcu dałem z siebie całe 40% i zrobiłem. Może ciebie zmotywuje
NeisBot (2026-04-09 16:24:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 30 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1497974790 v2 | 17 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1497991627 v1 | 6 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1497991629 v1 | 4 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/13718774670 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=181106355
NeisReview (2026-04-17 16:33:41+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/181107056
IvaKraljić (2026-04-09 16:28:06+00:00): The unnecessary split has since been merged in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181106702. #OptimoRoute
NeisBot (2026-04-09 16:28:22+00:00): Hi alt_tab, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 34 highway(s)
- 23 name(s)
- 27 surface(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=181106618
alt_tab (2026-04-09 16:33:13+00:00): yes per park mgmt these trails are not safe and are unmaintained
woodpeck_repair (2026-04-09 16:48:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 181107666 where the changeset comment is: revert removal of 'illegal' trails, please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F
alt_tab (2026-04-09 18:02:34+00:00): park mgmt and marin fire both agree these are NOT trails anymore due to both growth and erosion. both the parks and the fire dept get calls from people in trouble trying to access these trails.

please revert your un-delete
IvaKraljić (2026-04-09 17:01:12+00:00): The wrong tag has since been fixed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181108343. #OptimoRoute
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-09 17:06:12+00:00): Hi superminerJG, welcome to OSM.

Could you share more information or a source for "ma nena Wisimon" as an alternate name for Richmond Hill, Canada? Richmond Hill and 列治文山 make sense, but this other name looks unusual, so a citation or supporting reference would help verify it.

Thanks.
superminerJG (2026-04-12 01:32:30+00:00): That name ("ma nena Wisimon") is in Toki Pona, and I don't exactly have good citations on that one aside from anecdotal DMs with one person, so that can be removed if need be. However, it appears that I can't edit the names since it has a Wikidata tag.

The translation of that name roughly goes:
- ma - land -> city, town (Toki Pona requires a headword in front of names indicating what kind of thing it is)
- nena - bump, hill
- Wisimon - transliteration of "Richmond"

The Toki Pona name provided is now on Wikidata; I believe the Chinese name was already there to begin with.
woodpeck_repair (2026-04-09 16:48:55+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 181106042, 181106618.
milet (2026-04-11 15:08:42+00:00): Hi, bist du sicher, dass das ein Abschnitt der Stadtmauer ist? Also zur Befestigung/Verteidigung der Stadt gebaut. Auf älteren Luftbildern existiert diese Mauer nämlich noch nicht. Ist das eventuell eine Lärmschutzwand bzw. eine einfache Mauer?
phoque (2026-04-11 16:45:10+00:00): Ah, du hast Recht, das ist glaube ich was neueres, und ich wusste nicht, dass es da einen Unterschied gibt.

Ich werd's anpassen.
NeisBot (2026-04-09 17:09:22+00:00): Hi Asociación Alhambra Tierra Roja, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 98% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 5 amenity(s)
- 7 building(s)
- 76 highway(s)
- 2 historic(s)
- 5 leisure(s)
- 74 name(s)
- 1 natural(s)
- 2 sport(s)
- 3 tourism(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=181108636
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-09 17:12:07+00:00): C'mon, please not again, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181015768
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-09 17:12:29+00:00): Should both be reverted ...
NeisRevert (2026-04-09 17:15:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/181108905
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
NeisBot (2026-04-09 17:12:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13719067631 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Fitness studio"
---
Zum Beispiel könnte eine neutralere und sachlichere Version deines Textes lauten: "Fitness-Studio"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-04-17 22:33:05+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/181128115
doggosmile (2026-04-11 15:10:44+00:00): please use natural=tree! using forest tagging is not what you should do here
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-09 17:23:39+00:00): Hallo wahre_pan, willkommen bei OSM.

Vielen Dank für das Eintragen der durchaus interessanten Namen :)

Ich bin neugierig: Können diese Straßennamen irgendwie durch eine Quelle o. ä. belegt/geprüft werden?

Danke und viele Grüße
wahre_pan (2026-04-09 17:33:20+00:00): Hallo pitscheplatsch,
das sind die Strassennamen welche wir bei Übungen dort verwenden. Litschi ist schon länger hinterlegt und gehört auch dazu, es war einfach an der Zeit die weiteren Namen mal einzutragen. Wenn es stört kannst es wieder löschen, aber für uns und auch die ganzen Hobbysoldaten ist das sehr hilfreich. Viele Grüße
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-11 11:50:58+00:00): Danke für die Antwort. Viele Grüße
NeisBot (2026-04-09 17:21:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13685403731 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Textile Studio"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-17 22:33:08+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181478895
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
plennert (2026-04-10 11:37:31+00:00): wieso hast du das gelöscht? das ist ein Turm der auf dem Dach der Häuser steht. müsste eigentlich buildung:part sein ...
bitte wieder rückgängig machen und eine meldung an "EinEngener" Schreiben, der die Version 1 erstellt hat.
Aethonatic (2026-04-17 23:32:05+00:00): Thank you for pointing this out, I've restored the way as a building:part. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181479173
HellMap (2026-04-10 17:44:49+00:00): Please do not disconnect ways from other ways like you did with https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1497946028 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1497946029 . There were mapped correctly. If disconnected, these become unroutable deadends in the rest of the path/road network.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-04-09 17:36:18+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 180563297, 180563305, 180563314, 180563323, 181039893, 181040167, 181040387.
sommallorqui (2026-04-10 18:52:24+00:00): no entiendo porque me habéis eliminado todos mis cambios cuando yo no soy la persona que ha hecho vandalismo en el arenal
SomeoneElse (2026-04-10 22:21:46+00:00): For context, see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/betrunkene-near-mallorca/142877/34
Edelsalami (2026-05-03 07:25:01+00:00): Hallo even66 alias Streetview247, ich habe die von dir eingetragenen taktilen "Fußwege" gelöscht, da die Objekte keine Gehwege, sondern den Gefahrbereich der Plattform markieren. Würde eine blinde Person den von dir gemappten Wegen folgen, so würden sie von einem durchfahrenden Zug erfasst. Für blindengerechte Wege gibt es übrigens besondere Tags, die zu benutzen sind: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:tactile_paving

Gruß
Senihtu (2026-04-10 05:02:10+00:00): Guten Morgen!
Die von Dir neu eingezeichneten Tore node 13719158927 und node 13719158927 versperren der Buslinie Bus WE1: Erzhausen => Darmstadt Schloß (Relation 12835765) den Weg.
Gibt es an den Toren Freigaben für den öffentlichen Nahverkehr? oder fahren die Busse jetzt woanders?
happy mapping!
Juke9573 (2026-04-10 06:46:27+00:00): Oha, das war nicht mein Absicht! Der Bus fährt da weiterhin.
Die Tore sind im Zaun zwischen Spielplatz und Straße. (Damit die Kinder nicht unterm besagten Busse landen) 

Ich habe EveryDoor benutzt um die Tore einzutragen. Hätte ich da etwas spezielles machen müssen, damit sie nicht in die Straße "herein" gehen?