piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Joseph R P (2023-07-10 19:08:09+00:00): It is a busy road, but busy doesn't always equal primary. International Drive mainly serves as a connection to the commercial and residential areas that are within the northeastern quadrant of Tysons rather than serving as a major arterial road like Gallows Road, Route 123, and Route 7, which all connect several towns and cities in the area and serve as alternatives to nearby freeways. International Drive does have a connection to the DTR, but if you're going up Gallows Road to get onto the DTR, it is more direct to make a left onto VA 7 rather than to follow International Drive.
WC392309 (2023-07-11 02:53:19+00:00): I would just keep it primary for now since it is an important route, but OSM data will determine if it is primary or secondary
WoodWoseWulf (2023-07-07 03:43:44+00:00): Hello PotatohChipe,

welcome back to OSM. You added a lot of strange stuff in this changeset. Please remember that when you publish your changes, everyone can see them. I have removed the park and other features you added here.
PotatohChipe (2023-07-07 12:32:51+00:00): Sorry about that. I was trying out the features and I thought I had deleted it before I published. Won’t happen again.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-12-21 04:57:51+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145355372
Patrickov (2023-07-17 23:18:51+00:00): Hi, your change has broken a few bus routes.  I only found them out when OSM Inspector keeps yelling that certain routes are "invalid" over the past few days.

If you are altering ways, please take care of the relations using them.  Thanks.
Kovoschiz (2023-07-31 20:09:38+00:00): Please don't draw pencil tip shaped intersections with divided islands by connecting them to a single point. This distorts the turn geometry, and will confuse some applications. It's also ugly.
Kovoschiz (2023-07-31 20:10:01+00:00): 2. The `=secondary` should be kept in the intersection.
Kovoschiz (2023-07-31 20:13:27+00:00): 3. `maxlength=12` is already added on the Yan Cheung Rd right-turn. There's no need to add a redundant `restriction:conditional=no_right_turn @ length > 12` 
4. Please split your uploads.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-12-21 04:57:49+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145355371
eggie (2023-07-07 06:38:41+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Glassman (2023-07-08 15:05:28+00:00): Instead of removing the trails that exist, they should be tagged as access=no and informal=yes. That provides useful information to search and rescue teams. It also allow property owners to block and return the trails to its natural environment.

Can you add these trails back with the correct tags? Let me know if you need help.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138210153
Tony Velasco (2023-07-08 16:56:37+00:00): These are literally not trails. They have no foot traffic. I know Jeremy the guy who put them on there, and he was just using lidar images of old lumber road grades you could see on lidar, but not see in person, and are not in use as trails. We are actually meeting on Monday to do more updates.
Tony Velasco (2023-07-08 16:58:04+00:00): Also, the Green Mountain trail through that area was just an approximation by Jeremy. We will be hiking it with GPS on Monday to properly and accurately map it.
Tony Velasco (2023-07-08 17:20:07+00:00): When we do that, it will actually re-add part of one of those trails partially, as that is really where part of the Green Mountain trail actually goes.
Glassman (2023-07-08 18:18:26+00:00): Thanks for the information. I agee the old trails sounds like they should be removed. 

BTW - have you used Strava Heatmap to see what usage the area is getting?

 https://www.strava.com/heatmap#18.08/-122.45942/45.65255/hot/all shows significant activity in the area. By creating an account, you can actually load a strava heatmap in the editor which makes adding trails much easier since a single gpx trace is often off a bit.

Let me know if you need any help. I'm out of town today and tomorrow but back by Monday.
Tony Velasco (2023-07-08 18:43:18+00:00): I have a strava account, but I'm trying to figure out how to actually get the global heat map data. The heat map data confirms exactly what I have been saying. There is no activity at all on those old lidar extended traces that Jeremy added. Only on the trail itself. It does accurately show the new trail sections that we have put in, so would be incredibly helpful to adding to the maps!

Thanks, and I would love your help. When you're back and available!
Jfact0ry (2023-07-07 16:15:55+00:00): Things here tagged lighthouses are beacons.
CurlingMan13 (2023-07-07 16:42:26+00:00): I'll update that.
Jfact0ry (2023-07-07 16:50:20+00:00): I fixed it, sorry. I was just surprised when I saw lighthouses.
Joseph R P (2023-07-09 16:17:17+00:00): Hello, some of these area tags are incorrect. The farmland along the Humboldt River would be more correct tagged as meadows since they appear to be used for grazing rather than growing crops, and a lot of what is tagged as natural wood would be better tagged as scrub and wetland since it's mostly inundated shrubbery/stunted trees or reed with very coverage from trees that would warrant calling it woodland (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/885010630 for instance).
TheConductor (2023-07-09 17:34:52+00:00): I disagree. This is where local knowledge is key and why I make specific mention to having verified my tagging on the ground. I specifically tagged it as farmland because: 
A: I know the farmer who owns that land and the crops that he grows
B: The imagery we are referencing (Bing) shows the farms as fallow currently because 2022 was exceptionally dry and he was working other assets he has elsewhere.
C: The crop grown there is alfalfa

As for the natural area tagging. If you would look closer, you will see that because you took the time to re-tag a lot of the natural areas, it gave me cause to take a closer look and be more deliberate in my tagging. You will see that I have gone to great lengths to differentiate between wooded areas, scrub, heath, wetland, and other natural area tagging. Once again, this is where local knowledge and surveying much of the area with my own eyes gives me the advantage.
Joseph R P (2023-07-09 18:29:01+00:00): Were the fields used for grazing temporarily during the 2022 drought? AcreValue shows that the land was used for "Grass/Pasture" and "Non-Cropland" during that year. There also appears to be animals grazing the fields in Esri Clarity, but that could be from well over a decade ago.

About the other landcover, a lot of it appears to be traced from Esri imagery, so that would explain the patterns west of US 95 not matching up with the Bing imagery, but I can't really see anything outside of large shrubs or standalone trees that would count as natural wood - not from the aerial imageries provided by OSM nor the Bing/Mapillary streetview from Interstate 80. It's completely different from the natural wood you've been mapping in the mountains (which does look great, by the way), which is actual forest versus wetland with some scattered trees, so the distinctions you're trying to make between natural area tagging around this area aren't entirely clear to me.
TheConductor (2023-07-09 18:54:18+00:00): The fields are used intermittently for grazing. They do have cattle operations and there are times where the fields are opened to grazing but it’s primary use is river irrigated crop land which is why I originally opted to tag as landuse=farmland as opposed to meadow. I think Esri Clarity is from around 2008 so it’s really old. Esri Imagery is from 2018 and it shows both crop cultivation and grazing.

The original trace was from Maxar because it was the most recent prior to Bings upload in 2022. Esri and Maxar are basically the same from what I’ve seen in my editing. West of 95 is what I’ve been working on heavily the last 2-3 days since your initial edits. That should be appearing on the slippy soon. There are large groves of oak, maple, and other broadleaves trees that are clustered around the river. West of 95, there are the same clusters but you’re definitely right l, there’s a lot more scrub. I’ve made that distinction (and continue to work on it). East of 95, I agree with your distinction. In my haste, I made a large scale revert that took everything back to what it was prior to your edit. My goal is to finish west of 95 before I get to the east. I’m a little wary of the wetland tag just because the aerial makes its look that way but on the ground but it’s quite different. The river is deep and the area on either side that appears to be wetland is often just scrub or heath (river hasn’t flooded since 1984). But, like I said, I’m still working on it and I do appreciate you bringing that area back to my attention because it’s always been one of those things that I’ve meant to get back to but have been working on other things. 

Also, just another note that I wanted to reach out to you about. I noticed you made some highway classification changes. I don’t disagree. I’d just ask that before making those in the future, you consult the local community and the Nevada guidance. If you have any comments/suggestions. Let me know and we can get those added. Thanks!
Joseph R P (2023-07-09 19:37:20+00:00): Thank you for the clarification about the farm landuse in the west. If they're crop fields that are intermittently used as pastures then farmland seems to be the best tag for that. Though I also think the tagging channel in the OSM US Slack server would have a field day (pun not intended) trying to figure out how to incorporate both meadow and farmland tags into one to indicate what they're used for often differs.

Just a note about the highways, I did initially plan on creating a discussion for the highways I changed, but ultimately decided against it since I didn't want to make a convoluted proposal that would end up without a consensus and thought they were uncontroversial enough to not really need one. I did however decide against upgrading the Boise/Mountain Home - Elko route to trunk since that is undoubtedly more controversial and would also require getting in touch with Idaho editors. I will probably make a Slack proposal for that later on to see what others think.
TheConductor (2023-07-09 20:13:13+00:00): Haha I agree. There would definitely be some candid discussion. Maybe a secondary tag like grazing=yes but that’s a conversation for another day.

That sounds good on the highways. I didn’t comment anything because they’ve long been edits that I’ve been contemplating and you beat me to it. I’ll get those added to the Nevada guidance sometime in the next week or two so they’re “official”. I agree that making a slack proposal for the Elko to Boise via Mountain Home is a good idea. I will say that both US 93 and 95 are the options that most people will likely choose over NV 225 just due to location, route hierarchy, winter maintenance, etc. Thats just my basic take but float the proposal, I think it’s well worth a discussion. Also, Las Vegas is looking really good! Kudos there!
seattlefyi (2023-07-07 13:46:26+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM. Just letting you know some of the tags you used weren't quite in the standard format - another editor already corrected them, then your latest update undid their fixes. I'll change this back to the fixed version, perhaps you can use it as an corrected example. Please don't overwrite it again. Thanks.
Supaplex (2023-07-07 16:13:37+00:00): Hi Is there any change of control of island? If not, you should not change the language of the main name field or input rubbish into other language name fileds
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138210786
Supaplex (2023-07-07 16:13:14+00:00): Hi Is there any change of control of island? If not, you should not change the language of the main name field or input rubbish into other language name fileds
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138210829
impiaaa (2023-07-07 21:10:21+00:00): When improving the geometry of a feature, it's better to add and realign the existing feature than to delete and re-draw. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history . You can add nodes to an existing way by dragging the arrow between two nodes.
AkuAnakTimur (2023-07-07 07:53:50+00:00): Hello. Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Could you please share, what is your source of data to add these housenumbers?
Heinz_V (2023-07-07 04:16:49+00:00): It is quite strange that a mappers continues to map and ignores all changeset comments. In case that you do not read comments at all, I will ask the DWG to  block your edits till you read and answer.
arjunaraoc (2023-07-07 06:11:31+00:00): I have also sent a email message two days ago regarding his edits to Bus stands and its  neighborhoods in Andhra Pradesh and have not received any response.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-11-19 17:01:58+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11031607106/history

is Dhimichaur name of this specific picnic site?
MxxCon (2023-07-08 23:05:57+00:00): Hello.
How exactly did you correct this tag?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138211538
solenoid jam (2023-07-10 19:50:38+00:00): Возможно я смогу ответить на ваш вопрос, если вы сформулируете его более конкретно.

========

Perhaps I can answer your question if you phrase it more specifically.
MxxCon (2023-07-10 22:23:44+00:00): В своем комментарии к changeset вы сказали "Исправление значения denotation=*". Как именно вы это исправили?
solenoid jam (2023-07-11 04:57:58+00:00): Пожалуйста, проскрольте вниз окно пакета правок, и до списка изменений. В списке вы можете кликнуть на элемент, изменения которого вас интересует. 
https://imgur.com/JFBb0J5.png

Далее внизу выберите "Посмотреть историю"
https://imgur.com/Wh49fZS.png

В новом окне будет показана история правок выбранного вами объекта. Вы сможете сравнить изменения сделанные пользователями ранее.
https://imgur.com/Iw1zAvj.png

Так можно узнать о том, что было изменено в пакете правок.

Более подробную информацию, вы сможете получить из статьи о пакетах правок.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

=========

Please scroll down to the bottom of the edit package window, and to the list of changes. In the list, you can click on the item whose changes you are interested in. 
https://imgur.com/JFBb0J5.png

Then select "View History" at the bottom
https://imgur.com/Wh49fZS.png

A new window will show the edit history of the selected item. You will be able to compare changes made by users earlier.
https://imgur.com/Iw1zAvj.png

This is how you can find out what has been changed in changeset.

For more information, see the article on changeset.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset
goaned (2023-07-07 16:19:56+00:00): Hallo, können wir über deine Änderungen am Zaun um das Dragonerhäufel herum sprechen?

Du hast den Zaun so umgezeichnet, dass er westlich der Bäume https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2044689140 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2044689905 verläuft. Da bin ich mir sehr sicher, dass das nicht richtig ist, das hab ich erst vor wenigen Tagen vor Ort mit CS 138027836 gemappt; der Zaun verläuft dort wirklich genau so merkwürdig, wie ich ihn gezeichnet habe.

Außerdem hast du diese 2 Knoten https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11020177040/history und https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11020177027/history gelöscht und durch Lücken im Zaun ersetzt. Das glaube ich auch nicht, dass das richtig war. Ich hätte dort (wie gesagt, ich war vor Ort) keine barrier=gate eingetragen, wenn ich das nicht vor Ort so (und anders als östlich davon, wo ich ja auch Lücken im Zaun gemappt habe) gesehen hätte.
goaned (2023-07-07 16:33:18+00:00): Davon abgesehen merke ich gerade, dass du in dem Bereich des östlichen Romaplatzes einen Zaun hinzugefügt hast. Da war in der Realität definitiv keiner, das ist mir ausdrücklich aufgefallen, deshalb habe ich keinen gemappt.
emergency99 (2023-07-08 08:30:01+00:00): Hmm, ich komme da seit 20 Jahren zumindes einmal in der Woche vorbei, das Dragonerhäufel ist generell komplett eingezäunt, auf der Südseite sind zumeist nur die Zaununterbrechungen, Tore generell nur da wo ich sie eingetragen habe, das Tor am Nordwestlichen ende ist exakt zwischen den je 2 Bäumen denn dieser Weg geht da so schräg nach Oben. (Sieht man auch auf Arial-Fotos, das hat sich seot mehr als 30 Jahren nicht geändert). Kann aber gerne heute hin gehen und es exakt verifizieren. Aber geberell soeht man das auch auf den arial-fotos (und auf der Romaplatzseite auf Google StreetView.) Aber dann verifiziere ich das heute mal komplett.
emergency99 (2023-07-08 09:55:51+00:00): Ok, die Tore im Süden dürften sie zwischen dem letzten mal das ich da wa und deiner begehung eingebaut haben, weil ich bin kürzlich neven dem Würstlstand noch durch die Zaununterbrechung durch. Tja, erste änderung in wohl 10-15 Jahren.

Das Tor und die Bäume im Nordwesten hab ich leicht angepasst aber das Tor ist devinitiv dort, die Bäume sind etwas falsch positioniert, leider schwer ganz exakt abzubilden.

Uaun geht komplett rum  ausser bei der Toilette, da endet er dicht am Gebäude.

Sollte so nun korrekt sein.
emergency99 (2023-07-08 09:56:19+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138257175
emergency99 (2023-07-08 10:10:17+00:00): Ok, ich glaub ich weis was passiert ist:
Wie ich (etwa 2 Tage vor dir) das letzte mal da war, war beim Würstelstand noch der alte grüne Zaun mit den Zaununterbrechungen, als du dann dort warst wurde der Zaun gerade umgebaut somit waren die Tore schon da, aber Teile vom Zaun nicht, jetzt ist hier ein neuer Zaun mit neuen Tore .

Habe die Zwei Bäume im nordwesten noch auf die korrekte Zaunseite geschoben.

Danke für den Hinweis
BCNorwich (2023-07-08 07:07:24+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Please be aware that you are creating duplicate sections of highways, this disrupts routing. I've just found and removed 10 such highways. It would be better if you made smaller changesets, this one has 50 features edited, 10 would be better. Then you or others can more easily check for mistakes.

Regards Bernard.
ovruni (2023-07-07 05:26:42+00:00): Hola, las en algunos de estos conjuntos de cambios se están modificando agregando carreteras que cruzan los contornos de agua del río.
Saludos
Saludos
eggie (2023-07-07 06:40:47+00:00): Welcome to OSM,

Deleting the bakery is okay... but please leave the address untouched.

Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2023-07-07 06:42:21+00:00): Restored addressnode
honeycakehorse (2023-07-07 07:14:02+00:00): oops, okay i'll take better care next time. thank you for comment & fixing!
Vinber-Pro (2023-07-07 07:30:56+00:00): perhaps changeset is too big and comment not very explicit. 
i undestand you remove denotation=christian when denomination=christian is present on school and place_of_worship

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:denotation
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:denomination
solenoid jam (2023-07-07 08:51:25+00:00): Ок)
ovruni (2023-07-07 05:51:25+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambios también se han agregado como edificios áreas que contienen edificios internos, también lo he revertido.
Saludos
Klementev Mark (2023-07-07 06:02:24+00:00): Hola, ¿en qué objetos cometí errores?
¿Puede explicar lo que no debo hacer para ayudar a dibujar el mapa?
Gracias.
ovruni (2023-07-07 06:05:14+00:00): Se han agregado universidades donde no las hay, se han agregado edificios en áreas que no son un edificio, ademas de otras que involucran mas de un edificio.
Saludos
Klementev Mark (2023-07-07 06:18:15+00:00): здравствуйте, я учту свои ошибки и больше не буду их допускать!
BAK365 (2023-10-05 16:22:14+00:00): Hallo, 
bei Q29712017, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/222684029, hast du das falsche Gebäude erwischt. Das ist ein normales Fabrikgebäude. Hänggitürme sind https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/549424021 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/545487463, im Prinzip die ganze Häuserzeile dem Bach entlang.

Ich überlasse dir die Korrektur, weil ich nicht weiss, wohin du mit dem Wikidata-Tag willst - auf ein anderes Gebäude, in eine Relation?

Grüsse, BAK365
mcliquid (2023-10-06 07:02:04+00:00): Vielen Dank für den Hinweis, habe es korrigiert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142218117
Patchanka (2023-07-08 18:30:16+00:00): Bonjour

je vois que vous avez modifié le nom (name) pour ajouter celui en basque après le français. Et également vous avez supprimé sans raison apparente les tags wikidata et wikipedia.
Je ne sais pas si vous recevez bien ces messages ? Ce n'est pas la première fois que moi ou d'autres contributeurs vous contacte pour le même soucis...
Dommage, chacun perd son temps en faisant comme cela...
Je vais donc corriger le name pour mettre le nom en basque en name:eu et remettre les tags wiki...
bonne soirée
limes11 (2023-07-07 19:20:44+00:00): STOP THIS.

You are creating duplicates with every single edit. Somebody has to now check every single one of your changes and clean up.

If you do not understand, ask. But don't continue.

Thanks

Limes
Baloo Uriza (2023-07-26 23:09:37+00:00): Please don't tag destination:lanes when not signed, and please don't change destination:street to destination.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138214227
A_Prokopova_lyft (2023-07-28 15:02:39+00:00): Hi Baloo Uriza,
We double-checked our edits and found no errors in applying the destination:lanes tag, all values were added according to the Lyft-owned images (which we can provide if needed).
Could you please provide any detailed explanation of the specific error you identified in the destination:lanes tag and the reasoning behind your decision to remove it? 

While mapping  we rely on Minh Nguyen’s proposal, the only complete and detailed page referring destination:lanes tag: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Minh_Nguyen/destination:street   
After researching OSM wiki pages and discussions of the tag in OSM slack channels, we came to the conclusion that at the moment there are no exact requirements or final decision on the use of the destination:street tag or the prohibition of adding street names to the destination tag.  
We would appreciate If you could share your insights about the destination:street tag. We would really like to learn more about its usage in order to apply it in the most correct way.

Best regards!
Baloo Uriza (2023-07-29 01:05:50+00:00): I'm intimately familiar with the intersection in question, and if this is the case, then nobody on your team is qualified to map in the United States.
Romwriter (2023-07-09 17:06:39+00:00): Hallo SebPet, herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap und vielen Dank für Deinen Beitrag. Kannst Du noch erklären, aus welcher Quelle Dein Wissen über die Postleitzahl stammt? Vielen Dank im Voraus. Beste Grüße, Romwriter
SebPet (2023-07-11 06:50:01+00:00): Hallo Romwriter,
mein Wissen stammt von Kolleginnen und Kollegen, die vor Ort arbeiten.
Viele Grüße
aixbrick (2023-07-07 10:09:59+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OSM,
der sperrige Name ist auch genau so vor Ort ausgeschildert? ALKIS und auch das Straßenverzeichnis der Stadt Jülich (https://www.juelich.de/strassenverzeichnis) kennen ihn nämlich nicht.
Gruß
SebPet (2023-07-07 11:23:15+00:00): Ja, die Straße wird so ausgewiesen.
Auch die Firma ETC Deutschland weißt die Straße bspw. als Adresse aus.
aixbrick (2023-07-07 13:23:15+00:00): Ich finde den Namen aktuell leider nur bei Google Maps. Auf https://enritec.com/de/contact/ steht lediglich "Stetternicher Staatsforst" (das ist aber auch kein Straßenname, sondern eine Ortsangabe). Wäre das ein existierender Straßenname, müsste ETC auf ihrem Anfahrtsplan nicht "Wilhelm-Johnen-Straße" als Ziel für Navis angeben (https://enritec.com/app/uploads/2023/02/route-description-etc-julich.pdf).
Hast du den Namen von Google Maps übernommen? Das ist nämlich keine für OSM erlaubte Quelle.