piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Jordi MF (2023-03-29 20:27:58+00:00): Comprendo tu interés y buena intención, pero debemos seguir las normas de etiquetado. Por cierto, ¿conocías este mapa?
https://policialocalpedreguer.files.wordpress.com/2018/08/montesolana.pdf
Klaus09408 (2023-03-30 08:53:54+00:00): Hola Jordi, quité todas las informaciones en el nombre. Espero que la gente lo va a entender. Hay otro detalle interesante: La comunidad de la Z.I. Les Salines de Calp tiene la dirección Riu Segura 2A. Eso vale para todas las casas de la comunidad. Ni hay entrada hacia la comunidad, solo de la otra calle.
Klaus09408 (2023-03-30 08:56:49+00:00): gracias por el mapa de la policia local. No conocí. Parece muy similar al mapa de monte-solana.es
Saludos.
Klaus.
Klaus09408 (2023-03-30 08:58:55+00:00): Por información: La idea de poner direcciones irregulares en el nombre nació por error. Había escrito en algunos casos por falta de concentración y de un momento al otro parecía todo muy claro en el mapa.
Si no se puede, lo dejamos. No estamos responsables del concepto extraordinario de numeración.
Saludos.
Klaus.
paunofu (2023-03-30 09:07:31+00:00): A veces las direcciones en las urbanizaciones son confusas, especialmente en la Costa Blanca... A algunas urbanizaciones (Zonas Intensivas) se les da el nombre de una calle cercana pero no necesariamente ese calle es por donde tienen acceso o reciben el correo.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134194772
emersonveenstra (2023-03-28 10:26:01+00:00): Hi,

You deleted several driveways in this changeset, are you sure they do not exist anymore?
euumav (2023-03-28 16:37:48+00:00): They do not. Those are bare patches of ground, not driveways.
emersonveenstra (2023-03-28 17:36:11+00:00): but they connect to the road and are used by the homeowners to get to their houses?
euumav (2023-03-28 17:51:31+00:00): Those areas are not driveable. There are short "driveways" but not at those locations. The driveways are just little stubs, not worth mapping.
emersonveenstra (2023-03-28 18:01:04+00:00): Re-added some of the removed driveways and also re-added the highway=residential tag in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/134231094
SomeoneElse (2023-03-29 14:52:33+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15654191 doesn't appear to be a statistical boundary
Jose Luis Infante (2023-03-29 15:32:25+00:00): Gracias por tu edición. Normalmente los edificios tienen a tener ángulos rectos. Cuando lo edites, dale al botón derecho, y te aparecerá la opción de cuadrar.
De esa forma quedará mejor dibujado.
Un saludo!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134195796
cserpell (2023-03-28 16:21:36+00:00): I am not sure that this a turning circle, as it has some grass in the middle.
suchAnight (2023-03-28 23:03:20+00:00): Hello cserpell. I originally noticed that there was a missing oneway around the way feature (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/862983432/history) but after further reading into the OSMwiki I saw that the feature on the ground met the criteria for a highway=turning_loop which has “a non-traversable traffic island in the middle,” (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dturning_loop), which I placed on the end node here, as I thought a simpler modeling seemed best. A turning_loop meets that description more than junction=circular since there is not multiple road intersections there (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Dcircular). I agree however that it doesn’t meet the criteria of turning circle which has “either there is no central island or the island is traversable” (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dturning_circle). Just for clarity’s sake, I wanted to point out that I did not tag this feature as a turning circle. Is that how you understand the OSMwiki Policy as well?
Curious about your thoughts on this. Thanks for your feedback.
cserpell (2023-03-28 23:06:41+00:00): You are right, it is a turning_loop, I didn't know about that tag. Thank you.
suchAnight (2023-03-28 23:16:26+00:00): Thanks for the review. Have a good day.
cserpell (2023-03-28 16:22:24+00:00): This point has even a tree in the middle, I don't think that is a turning circle.
suchAnight (2023-03-28 23:03:45+00:00): Hello cserpell. I provided a response on another changeset (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/134195811) similar to this one. Best
~Jhellico (2023-03-28 09:38:51+00:00): Адреса на території зайва — адреси присвоюються будівлям, а не територіям
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2023-03-28 09:43:14+00:00): Please set the pools as private (access=private) to be sure nobody counts them as accessible public pools. Thanks!
Chlooe A (2023-04-18 15:52:15+00:00): done!
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2023-04-18 23:45:45+00:00): It does not seem to be added. You need to add the this tag:
"access=private"
to each of the pools.
Chlooe A (2023-04-19 01:32:20+00:00): well, mr/mrs. chair mobility, I did add it. anyhow, I assure you no one comes around looking to swim in peoples private pools.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2023-04-19 10:31:22+00:00): OpenStreetMap data is often parsed by automated tools for data analysis. You cannot assume that a human will be verifiying each and every one of the tags and its value. For instance if I want to estimate the average distance from every home to the nearest publically accessible pool, I would get way to many short distances in this case, because private pools must have the tag access=private and right now in your edits they do not.

You said that you added the private tag but I think you forgot to save the changeset because most of your added pools are still missing the access tag. I will fix it for you, but please take the time to read the official openstreetmap wiki before doing edits, so it can be valuable to the community. Thanks for your understanding.

WIKI: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2023-04-19 10:38:41+00:00): I fixed the missing private tags on some of the pools. I think you just forgot to add it to some of the pools. It is now complete. By the way, I am not mr. Chair Mobility, I work as a research associate for the Chaire Mobilité, which is a transportation research laboratory in Polytechnique Montreal. :-)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-28 00:16:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134197510 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some political edits by a new user in Western Sahara
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-28 00:16:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134197510 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some political edits by a new user in Western Sahara
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-28 00:16:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134197510 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some political edits by a new user in Western Sahara
SomeoneElse (2023-03-28 00:20:50+00:00): Hello,
This was essentially your first edit to OpenStreetMap; generally speaking trying to change international borders is not a good first change in OpenStreetMap.
We've had to undo your changes as they have broken the relations here.
If you have any questions, please email data@openstreetmap.org with a subject of "Re: [Ticket#2023032110000134] Western Sahara"

Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-20 14:20:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 150265070, 150261530, 150261385, 150261427, 150261374, 150261398, 150261463, 150262164, 150264883, 150261443, 150265293, 150265518, 150263711, 150261692, 150263544, 150263148, 150264695, 150263349, 150262918, 150264472, 150264284, 150261551, 150264090, 150262527, 150262687, 150263890, 150261413, 150261488, 150261509 where the changeset comment is: No reply to https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15936 , so we've taken a guess at what was likely derived from Google Earth (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149290548 admits to that use)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-28 00:16:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134197510 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some political edits by a new user in Western Sahara
Johnny Mapperseed (2023-03-27 23:48:11+00:00): Ack, thought the she was on an earlier changeset. That one is pure armchair mapping, I saw the noise wall though.
Johnny Mapperseed (2023-03-27 23:48:57+00:00): *shed
eggie (2023-03-28 10:29:08+00:00): Welkom bij OSM. Kleine aanpassing gemaakt. Info samengevoegd met bestaande adresnode,
mvg
eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-28 00:16:13+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 134196588, 134196673, 134196891, 134196962, 134197101, 134197111, 134197129.
rskedgell (2023-03-28 11:06:35+00:00): Does w202984061 really need any tags? It's the sole member of a boundary relation for an eruv (which has all the relevant tags), but the area it encloses certainly isn't private.
Openwebmapper (2023-03-29 11:01:35+00:00): Apologies as new member here, the boundary feature type was incorrectly place as fence, was change to line, other tags were not set by me. I was not aware, however way history show this was set as barrier (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/202984061/history), version 1. Many thanks.
rskedgell (2023-03-29 11:13:14+00:00): No problem - it wasn't a mistake on your part anyway.

I suspect that when the members of the eruv boundary were consolidated into a single way, they inherited the barrier=fence and access=private tags from what were originally separate members of the boundary.

Thanks for spotting it and fixing it.
JAAS (2023-11-16 22:20:49+00:00): Buenas tardes FerroCarrilOSM,

Aparentemente la mayoría de las ediciones que has agregado a OSM, y que no pueden verse aún en otras fuentes de imágenes satelitales que no sea Sentinel 2 (a la que no he encontrado cómo acceder) han quedado inconclusas. En esta oportunidad has dejado varios segmentos de `path` que no conducen a ningún sitio, habiendo sido originados en ningún sitio, por ejemplo: (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1157811437).

En todo caso, todo esto (incluyendo la misma línea férrea que aún no ha sido formalmente inaugurada) sugiero que debiera ser ingresado como `construction` al menos en lo que se pueda corroborar su ubicación exacta (en principio con imágenes satelitales), así como las conexiones que se están alterando ahora y que conectan con la red vial actual. 

El hecho de dibujar en base a una fuente que no es visible a todos, dejando tantos "cabos sueltos" con respecto a la red vial actual, es bastante nefasto para las herramientas de ruteo que SI funcionan actualmente (por poner un ejemplo).

OSM es un proyecto comunitario a el que todos los que contribuimos, por un motivo u otro, tenemos la obligación de discutir cómo se pueden hacer las cosas sin afectar al resto de la comunidad. Mucho menos tomarnos la libertad de BORRAR elementos agregados por otros sin tener una justificación comprobable. Así ha sido establecido el "sistema" para mantener la cordialidad entre todos los editores que contribuimos a este proyecto.

En otras oportunidades he intentado comunicarme contigo, siendo tu evidente silencio absoluto la única constante... por favor coméntanos algo y veamos cómo se pueden ingresar los datos a los que tú tienes acceso, sin afectar tan grotescamente los demás datos que ya han sido ingresados de buena fe por otros.

Atentamente,
JAAS
joel56dt (2023-03-31 17:10:36+00:00): Hello, can you help me understand the difference between building=stadium and building=grandstand? This looks more like a grandstand than a stadium to me.

Thanks
Controlled-access (2023-04-01 12:33:01+00:00): I agree, grandstand is the better fit here for these separated, rectangular seating structures
A Hall (2023-05-26 18:27:20+00:00): Per my understanding, the inclusion of the kV in transmission line names is incorrect. This is a descriptor, which is captured in a separate key. Can you stop adding the kV to the name, or work with the larger OSM community to get consensus and update the documentation on the wiki? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:power=line
user_5359 (2025-05-01 06:03:44+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/199840052. You add the tags
  clothes:children = yes;used
  clothes:men = yes;used
  clothes:women = yes;used
to book store. Can you still remember this shop?
osmee333 (2025-05-01 15:28:03+00:00): Hello,
Thaat is not a mistake
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1998400522

Please check https://www.bookoff.co.jp/shop/shop10019.html

10:00～20:00（洋服・服飾雑貨・ブランド品・貴金属売場） = 10:00 AM to 8:00 PM (Clothing, Fashion Accessories, Brand-Name Items, and Precious Metals)

It is Book Off + which is a multi-item store.

I changed the POI to Thrift Store, because they sell books but in this case other second hand goods. Thank you for finding this error.
osmee333 (2025-05-01 15:29:22+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165681707
osmee333 (2025-05-01 15:30:58+00:00): Sorry. I am not active anymore. So thank you for raising this issue.
PlaneMad (2023-04-05 16:32:02+00:00): Incredible work adding hiking paths in Parsik Hills!
snoozingnewt (2023-03-28 01:37:25+00:00):  *centralia (for the five most recent ones), forgot to change changeset comment
Oberaffe (2023-10-06 08:09:08+00:00): Many 110 Kv lines are not 110kV! Please dont. Please do not enter voltage values that you have no idea if they are correct!
wille (2023-03-28 12:04:36+00:00): Olá. Qual a fonte da informação do nome da rua cláudio fontenelle? Pesquisei fotos do mapillary, dados do ibge e da prefeitura e não encontrei esse nome.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134199771
user_18721979 (2023-03-28 19:23:00+00:00): Olá, Boa tarde! Como está? Minha fonte é o conhecimento local já que estudei no ICI e acho que ainda tem uma placa velha e azul da prefeitura no muro próximo do portão com o nome da Rua Cláudio Fontenelle, Qualquer outra duvida é só perguntar!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134199771
Devdatta (2023-03-28 03:59:24+00:00): Hi! Welcome to OSM! Can you please put meaningful Commit Messages.

Also try to capture correct building shapes; The buildings in the changeset are rectangular, but you have not captured them with 90 degree corners.
pyrog (2023-04-15 13:32:11+00:00): Hi,

What are these real objects ? tourism=information
information=mobile

information=mobile tag is not documented and there could be better tags for this device ?

Best regards,
Yves
user_7130456 (2023-07-08 17:59:06+00:00): 删除军事区域在OSM属于违规行为
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134200876
Glassman (2023-03-29 00:03:49+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134201142
warkaree (2023-03-28 09:15:06+00:00): नमस्कार

आपण हा कॅमेरा काढून टाकला आहे?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10609340208/history

ह्याचे कारण काय ते सांगू शकता का?
vikrambagade (2023-03-28 10:04:11+00:00): Hi,
Camera was placed in between of road, so have deleted. But, as per street view 3 cameras are present at same location. So, I have again added one camera.
Thanks for your feedback.
warkaree (2023-03-28 10:30:02+00:00): तुम्ही मागाशी जो कॅमेरा काढून टाकला तो इथे होता (अक्षत हॉटेल जवळ) - https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/18.58836/73.78462

आता जो तुम्ही जोडला आहे तो इथे आहे (merazo हॉटेल जवळ) - 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/18.58860/73.77963

हे दोन वेगळे ठिकाण आहे. 

कृपया काढून टाकलेला कॅमेरा योग्य ठिकाणी परत जोडा.
vikrambagade (2023-03-28 10:53:11+00:00): Hi,
Thanks for feedback. 
But In streetview, Surveillance cameras are not available at Akshat hotel and placed two cameras are also need to remove and  near Marazo hotel, we can see 3 cameras are present on Pole.
Please suggest
warkaree (2023-03-28 11:55:27+00:00): तुम्ही कोणता streetview वापरता व त्यातील फोटो कधीचे आहे मला माहीत नाही. मी मात्र ह्या परिसरात राहतो व हे कॅमेरे मी अलिकडेच (गेल्या एक दीड महिन्यात) स्वतः प्रत्यक्षात बघून जोडले होते. तुम्हाला जर खात्री असेल की तुमची माहिती माझ्या माहितीपेक्षा जास्त नवीन आहे व अचूक आहे, तर आपण तुम्ही केलेले बदल तसेच ठेऊ शकतो. पण जर तुम्हाला खात्रीपूर्वक माहीत नसेल तर कॅमेऱ्यांची माहिती मी सांगितल्याप्रमाणे पूर्वस्थितीवर उलटावा, ही विनंती.
warkaree (2023-03-28 11:56:46+00:00): तुम्ही जो streetview वापरता तो कोणत्या संकेतस्थळावर बघायला मिळू शकतो का? असेल तर कृपया मला त्याची दुवा पाठवा.
vikrambagade (2023-03-29 03:57:50+00:00): Hi, As you suggested and considering your local knowledge, added Camare near Akshat Hotel and deleted camera from Merazo hotel
Thank for your feedback and support to us.
warkaree (2023-03-29 04:46:10+00:00): धन्यवाद. पण नवीन जोडलेल्या कॅमेराची माहिती जुन्या काढून टाकलेल्या कॅमेरासोबत जुळत नाहीये. 

नवीन : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10770004503

जुने : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10609340208/history

तेवढं सुधारलं तर काम पुर्ण होईल :) 

आणि हो “camera was placed in between of road” ह्यात काही चुकीचं नाहीये. कारण हे कॅमेरे एका आडव्या खांबावर बसवलेले असतात जो कधीकधी पुर्ण रस्त्यांची रुंदी व्यापू शकतो. त्यामुळे कॅमेरा हा रस्त्याच्या रुंदीत कुठे ही असू शकतो, हे लक्षात घाय :)
vikrambagade (2023-03-29 05:53:03+00:00): Hi, As you suggested, updated old tags to new placed camare.
Please check and confirm.
Thanks for your feedback
warkaree (2023-03-29 06:32:39+00:00): आता बरोबर आहे. धन्यवाद :)
snoozingnewt (2023-03-28 04:54:17+00:00):  Thanks for mapping! Could you please use more descriptive changeset comments? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
mavl (2023-04-25 09:10:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
Minh Nguyen (2023-03-29 04:24:26+00:00): Continuing the discussion from https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/9565 , access=official is officially deprecated, and the value “official” actually meant the same as “designated”. In other words, you’re saying the service roads are designed to be used by all traffic (except air traffic). Changeset 134243656 retags them as access=private private=maintenance, as they aren’t even for airport employees. Lyft editors have previously tagged similar nearby access roads as access=no, which is another option.
jidanni (2023-03-29 13:08:53+00:00): Thanks! See also https://github.com/simonpoole/beautified-JOSM-preset/issues/372
snoozingnewt (2023-03-28 05:06:20+00:00): Welcome to OSM! There's a specific tagging nomenclature for what you're trying to add, which is why the tagging for your place was changed in the first place. Because of this, I am removing the tags you just added, as they have already been converted into data that OSM uses - if you have any questions, you can shoot me a message!
Mashin (2023-03-28 09:21:27+00:00): More information about the correct format of address and opening hours can be find here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:*
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours
Jakka (2023-03-28 07:03:01+00:00): "Étang de Jardin" n'est pas un nom propre mais définition.
Corriger svp
Max-Kritic (2023-03-28 10:39:58+00:00): Ok
aTarom (2023-03-28 08:29:28+00:00): Hola quelgir,
s'ha quedat un tag sense cap valor a
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/134651013/history
"name:etymology:wikidata"=""
salutacions i gràcies per editar
NorthCrab_upload (2023-03-28 05:40:21+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o miejscowości. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, zastosuj kombinację addr:city + addr:street. Jeśli nie, przekaż nazwę miejscowości w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1157843109
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1157843110
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1157843111
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1157843112
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1157843113
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1157843114
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1157843115
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1157843116
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1157843117
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1157843118
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1157843119
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1157843120
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1157843121
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1157843122
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1157843123
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1157843124
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1157843125
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1157843126
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1157843127
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1157843128
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1157843129
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1157843130
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1157843131
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1157843132
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1157843133
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1157843134
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1157843135
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1157843136
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1157843137
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1157843138
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1157843139
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1157843140
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1157843141
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1157843142
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1157843143
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1157843144
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1157843145
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1157843146
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1157843147
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1157843148
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1157843149
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1157843150
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1157843151
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1157843152
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1157843153
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1157843154
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1157843155
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1157843156
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1157843157
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1157843158
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1157843159
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1157843160
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1157843161
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1157843162

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
user_11609320 (2023-03-28 05:51:01+00:00): the BIA map does not include the  CAMP 4 ranch annexation into the reservation.
pyrog (2023-04-16 08:08:26+00:00): Hi Rudy,

What are these devices ?

tourism = information
information = mobile
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6244739436

Best regards,
Yves
rudychung (2023-04-20 10:37:17+00:00): Hey Yves,

Apologies for getting back to you late, I just returned from an awesome 6-day hiking trip! 😄

I appreciate your concern about the tagging. Here's a link for you to check out:

https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/posts/2016085291790263/

Feel free to let me know if anything needs to be changed. Thanks a lot!

Sincerely,
Rudy  4/20
miluethi (2024-08-03 23:16:45+00:00): Hi Telemark,
Please do not change highway classifications unless you know what you are doing. NN-276 is a classified road. The official Nicaraguan classification is highway=tertiary
lanes=2
name=NN-276
ref=NN-276
smoothness=good
source:imagery=BingSat, ESRI, and other open satellite imagery available to OSM as of 2024
is "Colectora Principal".
TelemarkCanal (2024-08-07 01:42:16+00:00): Hello miluethi, I see that the NN-276 highway classification is now updated - thank you for letting me know it should remain tertiary. I will make sure to refer to the classification guidelines on the Nicaragua wiki page (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nicaragua/Calles_y_Carreteras) in future classifications. Best and happy mapping!