piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2025-08-14 17:33:59+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
DressyPear4 (2025-08-14 14:41:57+00:00): Olá, as vias dentro desse loteamento 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1219846747
estão visíveis na camada da Esri
você pode alterar do lado direito no menu de camadas
Paulo Silvestre (2025-08-14 16:59:24+00:00): Muito obrigado pela dica!!!
andyblueg (2025-08-20 13:58:43+00:00): Hallo, der gesamte Struck befindet sich bereits in einem Naturschutzgebiet (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/40950915). Ich denke, es ist daher nicht notwendig, die beiden Flächen (scrub + grassland) extra als nature_reserve zu markieren.
eggie (2025-08-14 14:13:59+00:00):  Probeer specifiek te mappen. 
surface=paved is te algemeen.
Tag bv surface=asphalt of paving_stones.
Paul van der Heijden (2025-08-14 14:20:35+00:00): Yes zal ik op letten
eggie (2025-08-14 17:35:41+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-08-15 09:08:52+00:00): name=Table verwijderd.
(Removed)
pitscheplatsch (2025-08-14 19:02:50+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

May I know some more information about your mapped Horse and cows? Thanks.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13070948401
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13070948501
Piotr-s (2025-08-14 19:29:10+00:00): Hi,

I marked on the map a place (a meadow) where cows and horses are grazed (they move freely and can be encountered on the paths - hiking trails in the area). They look very nice and can be a tourist attraction.

Regards,

P.
eggie (2025-08-14 20:57:50+00:00): Top!
user_5359 (2025-08-14 15:02:50+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Roughly drawn beaches and parks, some of which are more in the river than on land, are not acceptable. Please take more care when drawing and only draw existing objects. Don't be tempted to draw parks just because there may be more action there in the game. I have deleted your changes.
eggie (2025-08-14 20:57:24+00:00): Feedback.. Dit is oke.
gr eggie
ivanbranco (2025-08-25 10:37:37+00:00): Ciao Frapperr, qual è il motivo di questi changeset? Specchi d'acqua inesistenti, spiagge inesistenti, scogliere inesistenti ecc.

Ho ripristinato la situazione precedente.
CAM-Gerlach (2025-08-15 06:24:27+00:00): Hey, just a tip—if you're going to split a crossing, its a good idea to make sure you split it properly so that each crossing is its own way, instead of arbitrarily splitting some crossings and keeping others conjoined without a clear reason. Also, way 1422301376 you created is not a crossing, it is part of the sidewalk and should be tagged accordingly.

Finally, just as a reminder, its really helpful to other mappers to give your changesets meaningful, descriptive comments about what you changed and why, which you are especially expected to do as an organized, paid mapper. Speaking of which, as such per OSM policy you and your team members are required to (among other things) include a unique, documented hashtag to identify your changes as such in your changeset comments, e.g. #BikeStreets. Thanks!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170440591
TheKegzster (2025-08-15 13:30:01+00:00): I apologize for not getting some of the parts right. Just wanted to clarify that I am not a paid mapper as you suggest but someone using OSM for the first time. I am trying to help with a project and I am sorry I got some stuff wrong. The only tags I changed were when OSM was telling me there were messing tags and I only added what it suggested when it made sense to do so. As for splitting crossings, I will be more careful but I had no intention of messing anything up. Just wanted you to know i’m a college student trying to help with a project using a website for the first time instead of an organized and paid mapper as you suggested so I will try but it probably won’t be perfect.
CAM-Gerlach (2025-08-16 04:27:19+00:00): No worries, you didn't mess anything up and it wasn't wrong just incomplete, and I was giving you a few tips to make it better next time. If there really was something wrong, I would have gone ahead and fixed it right away :) Thanks for explaining the situation more in your other changeset comment, and sorry if I wasn't as kind and understanding as I should have been!

It took me a while to fully figure out crossing tags and get them 100% right, though nowadays the PWG has a schema and guide that has all the details in one place: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Foundation/Local_Chapters/United_States/Pedestrian_Working_Group/Guide As a new PWG member I am gonna work on making it friendlier and more accessible for new users.
rokas_osm (2025-08-19 14:06:39+00:00): Hallo Andrijana14
Ich habe bemerkt, dass du in Fribourg auf den Gleisen 4/5 und 2/3 einige Footways hinzugefügt hast. Diese Footways sind leider nicht physikalisch : Sie verbinden den unteren Teil einer Treppe mit der Plattform eine Etage höher (ich habe es noch vor Ort überprüft). 
Ich werde deshalb sie löschen. 

Ich habe auch gemerkt, dass du auch Footways in anderen schweizerischen Bahnhöfen (Lausanne, Basel, Winterthur, Wil, Sargans) hinzugefügt hast, immer Querwege, die von der Oberseite eines Plattformzugangs (Treppe, Rampe usw.) bis zum Rand der Plattform gezeichnet werden. Tags (wie z. B. Level) fehlen oft, sodass sie mit den umgebenden Objekten nicht kohärent sind. Diese Footways sind überflüssig, da die Objekte (Platform und Treppe/Rampe) bereits verbunden sind. 
Was ist der Grund dafür?
Andrijana14 (2025-08-21 14:40:58+00:00): Hi Rokas_osm
Danke für die Hinweise.

Du hast recht, in Fribourg ist mir ein Fehler bei den Levels unterlaufen, ich werde das auch nochmals prüfen / anpassen.

Die Footway in den Bahnhöfen erfassen wir grundsätzliche gemäss Modelliungsvorschlag: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:MENTZ_GmbH/Modellierungsvorschl%C3%A4ge_Indoor

Somit ist keine Angabe des Level implizit Level=0, das isch schon korrekt so.

Wir benötigen diese Fusswege von Rampen/Treppen an die Plattform Kante für das Fusswegrouting. Dies wird bereits Deutschland- bzw. Europaweit so gepflegt und ist so akzeptiert. Grundsätzlich hast du aber recht, die Platformen wären ja begehbar und mit den Rampen/Treppen verbunden. Wir benötigen diese Modellierung vorläufig aus technischen Gründen noch so.

Liebe Grüsse, 
Andrijana
mueschel (2025-08-21 09:13:13+00:00): which kind of vehicles can be bought/rented here? "scooter" is ambiguous.
rokas_osm (2025-08-19 14:06:33+00:00): Hallo Andrijana14
Ich habe bemerkt, dass du in Fribourg auf den Gleisen 4/5 und 2/3 einige Footways hinzugefügt hast. Diese Footways sind leider nicht physikalisch : Sie verbinden den unteren Teil einer Treppe mit der Plattform eine Etage höher (ich habe es noch vor Ort überprüft). 
Ich werde deshalb sie löschen. 

Ich habe auch gemerkt, dass du auch Footways in anderen schweizerischen Bahnhöfen (Lausanne, Basel, Winterthur, Wil, Sargans) hinzugefügt hast, immer Querwege, die von der Oberseite eines Plattformzugangs (Treppe, Rampe usw.) bis zum Rand der Plattform gezeichnet werden. Tags (wie z. B. Level) fehlen oft, sodass sie mit den umgebenden Objekten nicht kohärent sind. Diese Footways sind überflüssig, da die Objekte (Platform und Treppe/Rampe) bereits verbunden sind. 
Was ist der Grund dafür?
woodpeck (2025-08-14 17:56:06+00:00): This motorway looks implausible, particularly how it connects to the existing trunk road in the east. Please use better changeset comments than "1" and "2", they are not helpful.
OK_SZ (2025-08-14 14:50:08+00:00): Hausnummern aus https://nibis.lbeg.de/cardomap3/
misterte (2025-08-15 11:40:02+00:00): https://nibis.lbeg.de/cardomap3/ steht unter CC-BY 4.0 Lizenz und darf in OSM nicht verwendet werden. Alle Daten müßen revertiert werden
OK_SZ (2025-08-16 07:19:27+00:00): Das ist eine Datenbank des Landes. Das ist schwer verständlich, daß das nicht öffentlich genutzt werden darf. 
Ich begehe das noch in Kürze und bastel mir dann eine Skizze.
OK_SZ (2025-08-16 07:20:13+00:00): ... eine öffentliche Datenbank ...
custodiankeyy (2025-08-14 19:32:54+00:00): Renk girerken Hex kodu ile ya da yaygın ingilizce adı ile renkleri girin. Aksi takdirde anlaşılmıyor. Daha fazla bilgi için:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:colour
keithonearth (2025-08-14 20:11:57+00:00): Wow, fast work!
literan (2025-08-14 17:32:38+00:00): комплекс "Юго-запад" уже давно отмечен https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/96454941

Не стоит вносить дубли
habi (2025-08-14 15:33:43+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4909832
MassCartog (2025-08-14 17:03:09+00:00): Hi welcome to OSM. If the building still exists please dont remove it, just removed the tags for name and shop type, or better update them! thanks
NorthCrab_upload (2025-08-14 15:40:59+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13071065796

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
aTarom (2025-08-14 19:19:36+00:00): Hi, the tag
nnae:lt
is
name:lt?
i'm not sure 100% at "lt" part and the value
Can you help me?
Cheers
user_18913526 (2025-08-14 19:44:59+00:00): Thank you for noticing, I corrected it to name:lt
vasony (2025-08-16 20:02:07+00:00): Szia!

Nem Eszterházy?

T
vasony (2025-08-16 20:02:30+00:00): "Eszterházi sétány"-ra kérdem
pitscheplatsch (2025-08-14 18:58:01+00:00): #NameChange

Hi, welcome to OSM.

In this changeset, you have made numerous name changes, which included modifying names. Are these changes being made in coordination with the local community? Additionally, could you share more information about your sources?

I would appreciate a response.

Thank you.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-08 20:09:33+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12778281501/history has guest_house = hotel that was added in this edit
Would it be hotel? ( tourism=hotel - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dhotel )
Guest house? ( tourism=guest_house - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dguest_house )

Something else?
felipeeugenio (2025-08-15 12:55:02+00:00): Hola. Gracias por sus ediciones.
Dos temas:
1) por favor no cambiar clasificaciones de calles y
2) por favor no realinear solo mirando una foto (bing en este caso) hay varias fotos y todas tienen diferencias.

Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170444093
infeeeee (2025-08-14 18:16:46+00:00): Szia!

Facebook oldalak címét nem a website hanem contact:facebook mezőben tároljuk. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:contact:facebook

Nem tudom van-e lehetőség ezt megadni Osmandban.

További jó térképezést!
magyaristvan (2025-08-14 19:19:36+00:00): Megnézem majd, köszönöm, hogy szóltál.
infeeeee (2025-08-14 19:27:00+00:00): Megnéztem, haladó nézetben meg lehet adni, csak elkezded gépelni, hogy contact:facebook és feldobja.
magyaristvan (2025-08-14 20:10:09+00:00): Köszi, módosítottam.
Almorca (2025-08-28 11:56:55+00:00): Has cambiado a school escuelas infantiles lo que es incorrecto. Estaban bien mapeadas. ¿Puedes revertir ese cambio?
DocGato (2025-08-29 17:56:02+00:00): Hecho. He visto en el foro que ha habido discusión sobre esto también. Gracias por avisar.
Brummelwuff (2025-08-14 17:30:13+00:00): Moin, du hast mit der Änderung die Relation 01-77 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13240601 unterbrochen.
jengelh (2025-08-14 22:53:56+00:00): ok is nun behoben
Vinber-Pro (2025-11-19 10:56:05+00:00): bonjour,
si j'en crois le siret et ma connaissance c'est davantage un cordonnier qu'un spécialiste de clé ?

je pense le repasser en cordonnier craft=shoemaker et ajouter key_cutter=yes pour préciser qu'il fait des doubleS de clé ?

Ton avis ?

bonne carto
橘ヒカリ (2025-08-14 16:17:15+00:00): 阳泉北货场恢复使用。
https://www.sohu.com/a/918804230_122434053
guilfordclose (2025-08-27 16:35:54+00:00): Hi RunningDroid, there should only be one amenity=fuel object per location, you can use man_made=fuel_pump for multiple pumps/areas. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=fuel?uselang=en
RunningDroid (2025-08-28 17:37:28+00:00): Sorry, I was confused because the example on that page shows the fuel area matching the roof.

Is this OK?
https://imgur.com/a/8l9POPj#UD53Tg6
guilfordclose (2025-08-30 01:01:14+00:00): Yeah, an area is ok. Most commonly there is only one roof with pumps so it's a little simpler to put the amenity=fuel on that. In this case with multiple pumps an area is a good choice. Thanks for the response.
RunningDroid (2025-09-01 15:28:26+00:00): No problem, thanks for the advice
gscscnd (2025-08-15 07:48:35+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
NorthCrab_upload (2025-08-14 18:11:25+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1422327669

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Barroszt (2025-08-15 17:54:49+00:00): Poprawione
chris66 (2025-08-15 13:38:02+00:00): Hi, Zur Info: Die B58 Beckum wird heute ebenfalls freigegeben.

VG.
sahshoor (2025-08-14 16:54:48+00:00): Not sure they are "levels" as such, but that is how the tower appears.
pwbriggs (2025-08-14 17:07:39+00:00): Thanks for the contribution. In the future, could you please add a meaningful changeset comments so other mappers can more easily understand the purpose and intended scope of your changes?

Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments, and leave a message here if you have any questions.

Thanks!
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-08-15 11:07:13+00:00): Hi!

Can you give which distance threshold you are using for merging nodes?
Mapiate (2025-08-15 11:32:36+00:00): Hi, I didn't have a specific distance threshold. I mostly used the merge functionality in Rapid or moved nodes that were too close. I tried avoid oversimplifying the shapes and checked the shape after the merge.

Let me know if I missed something and happy to correct it or revert the changeset.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-08-15 11:39:03+00:00): No problem, I was just curious :-)

As long as you don't merge nodes that are more than 0.2-0.3 cm apart, that should be fine
Mapiate (2025-08-15 12:09:31+00:00): Got it. :) That makes sense to me and is easy enough to keep in mind when merging.
Frans S (2025-10-24 09:36:40+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
Please keep these comments in mind when you adress next mapathlon.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
A: Inaccurate mapping. 
E: Buildings not squared or rounded.
G: Included the shadow of the building.

Do not add a layer to a building to hide an error. Just place the building on the correct place, or adjust the road a bit.

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
jptolosa (2025-08-16 07:13:57+00:00): No queda muy claro si se puede, pareciera que si. Pero cuando volvieron a pintar la flecha sobre el asfalto no volvieron a pintar la que apunta hacia la izquierda:
 https://www.mapillary.com/app/user/kaart_360?lat=-33.478837&lng=-70.6601843&z=19.9&pKey=1248536216429370&focus=photo&x=0.5205517361861128&y=0.6165038616437889&zoom=0.913937547600914
pitscheplatsch (2025-08-14 18:47:56+00:00): #NameCheck

Hello and welcome to OSM.

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits, particularly those concerning the names you've added or modified.

Some of these names caught my attention as they are quite unique or a bit unusual. Could you please confirm if these additions were intentional or if they might have been added mistakenly?

Looking forward to your response.

Thank you!
pitscheplatsch (2025-08-14 18:46:22+00:00): #NameCheck

Hello and welcome to OSM.

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits, particularly those concerning the names you've added or modified.

Some of these names caught my attention as they are quite unique or a bit unusual. Could you please confirm if these additions were intentional or if they might have been added mistakenly?

Looking forward to your response.

Thank you!
NeisRevert (2025-08-14 18:40:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/170450899
where the changeset comment is: 
Remove vandalism
Tomas Straupis (2025-08-14 19:04:09+00:00): O jau tikrai oficialiai pakeista kelių numeracija šitaip? Kiek žiūriu, tai lyg ir ne?
Sagit_BY (2025-08-14 20:51:41+00:00): maybe I was in a hurry. then roll back the changes to A1. But E67 is not a road but a route and it definitely needs to be moved to the new road
Sagit_BY (2025-08-14 20:55:24+00:00): There is another change: Nuo trečiadienio, rugpjūčio 13 d., eismas 12,4 km ilgio atkarpoje bus nukreiptas naujai nutiesta magistrale. Nuo 85 iki 91 km transporto priemonės važiuos kairiąja kelio puse, o nuo 91 iki 97,4 km – dešiniąja. Taigi visas kelio ruožas nuo Marijampolės iki valstybės sienos su Lenkija taps visiškai pravažiuojamas nauja trasa.

Skaitykite daugiau: https://www.15min.lt/verslas/naujiena/saugukelyje-lt/svarbus-pokyciai-a5-kelyje-keisis-eismo-tvarka-1662-2504588?utm_medium=copied
RedAuburn (2025-08-14 17:42:32+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4908300
NeisRevert (2025-08-14 18:40:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/170450882
where the changeset comment is: 
Remove vandalism
pitscheplatsch (2025-08-15 06:24:08+00:00): User account has been blocked, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18606
AndyB_66 (2025-08-14 20:05:09+00:00): Zmieniłeś obrysy budynków, w sposób niechlujny, nie zachowując kątów prostych - powinieneś to poprawić. Nie mapuj budynków na podstawie ortofotomapy, gdyż widoczny obrys dachu często nie odpowiada obrysowi budynku na gruncie - lepiej użyć podkładu EGiB (ewidencja gruntów i budynków). Rozumiem, że jesteś początkujący, ale więcej staranności następnym razem, by nie popsuć tego, co wcześniej zrobili inni.
pitscheplatsch (2025-08-14 18:45:17+00:00): #NameCheck

Hello and welcome to OSM.

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits, particularly those concerning the names you've added or modified.

Some of these names caught my attention as they are quite unique or a bit unusual. Could you please confirm if these additions were intentional or if they might have been added mistakenly?

Looking forward to your response.

Thank you!
DanJfromOK (2025-08-14 18:51:11+00:00): Hi...thanks...glad to be here.

Yes I added this business intentionally. It is my own home-based business.

The main reason I'm here is that I noticed the pin for my address on a map included in an online order verification/tracking that I received was incorrect (a common problem here in our county for several years now) and I wanted to try to rectify that.

Thanks,
Dan
Udarian (2025-08-14 19:24:04+00:00): next time when you add footpaths inside of a park please connect them to the wider network so that you are not forming a pedestrian navigation island.
AndyB_66 (2025-08-14 19:52:29+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
NieWnen (2026-04-21 19:59:06+00:00): Cześć, 
niestety powyższy zestaw zmian został wycofany.

Te oznaczenia ścieżek nie są do końca poprawne. Proszę zapoznaj się z wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Rowery#Drogi_dla_pieszych_i_rower%C3%B3w

2 najpopularniejsze przypadki występujące w Polsce to DDR i CPR/DDRiP (S5 i S7 na wiki).

W przypadku DDR (droga rowerowa) będzie to highway=cycleway.

W przypadku (CPR lub DDRiP) ciągu pieszo rowerowego/drogi dla rowerów i pieszych, będzie to
highway=path
bicycle=designated
foot=designated
segregated=yes/no

Bardzo pomocna jest też dodana nawierzchnia surface=*. Na wiki jest przykład jak dodać do części rowerowej i pieszej dla drugiego przypadku.
citrula (2025-08-14 21:00:35+00:00): Please don't use descriptive names for roads - it's fine if the road is unnamed if it doesn't actually have a name.
buy_osmand (2025-08-20 06:09:30+00:00): To citrula, 
with your experience, please do indicate in writing, which will be the appropriate variant if `name` is unaccepted by local community 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name#Variants

ٱلسَّلَامُ عَلَيْكُمْ,
as-salāmu ʿalaykum,
4004 (2025-08-16 23:56:21+00:00): здравствуйте, спасибо за правку.
теги поправлю, только не удаляйте тег здания в следующий раз, когда выбираете заготовку магазина
unique_identifier (2025-08-14 18:23:51+00:00): Hab es hier erfolgreich zurückgesetzt: https://www.osm.org/changeset/170450141
Die richtigen Änderungen an network und network:short hab ich drin gelassen
unique_identifier (2025-08-14 18:24:21+00:00): Comment beim flaschen changeset
pitscheplatsch (2025-08-14 18:44:37+00:00): #NameCheck

Hello and welcome to OSM.

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits, particularly those concerning the names you've added or modified.

Some of these names caught my attention as they are quite unique or a bit unusual. Could you please confirm if these additions were intentional or if they might have been added mistakenly?

Looking forward to your response.

Thank you!
eggie (2025-08-14 19:06:17+00:00): 
Tip... voeg ook de aard van het bedrijf toe. Alleen een naam doet niets.
..office=company. ?
Mvg
eggie
rle32795 (2025-08-17 07:16:46+00:00): Väylät on jo erotettu niiden tyyppien (highway=*) mukaan.
user_5359 (2025-08-15 13:27:23+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/13071379131 (one of six nodes). What is the mean of the tags
area = 2.5
area:units = m2
And yes the key area exist, but this indicates that a closed way represents an area (polygon).
hatul (2025-08-15 05:05:17+00:00): אין להשתמש בgovmap או צילום לא חופשי אחר

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170463064
OSMCowboy (2025-08-14 19:23:49+00:00): Correction: imagery used was MGP Pro 2025-06-07
Tomas Straupis (2025-08-26 14:08:06+00:00): Labas. Kas tiksliai yra šitas objektas? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1422354583 Ar tikrai čia yra turistinis/lankytinas objektas?
DodoGTA (2025-08-27 08:46:03+00:00): Aš galėjau jį pažymėti kaip tourism=artwork (bet aš radau miesto mylėjimo ženklą pažymėtą su tourism=attraction; tai taip ir dariau)

O čia yra to ženklo nuotrauka: https://postimg.cc/23H6WGnR
Tomas Straupis (2025-08-27 09:38:12+00:00): Ačiū už nuotrauką. Taip, čia tikrai ne tourism=attraction (nes nei vienas turistas nevažiuos specialiai šito ženklo žiūrėti). Jei kažkur kitur buvo kaip tourism=attraction pažymėtas toks objektas, galima drąsiai keisti į tourism=artwork ar pan.
Hufkratzer (2025-08-15 22:34:25+00:00): Hi,
I have a question about https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1422354662: This seems to be a camp site specifically for horseback riders  (https://www.nps.gov/yose/planyourvisit/tmhorsecamp.htm : "Tuolumne Horse Campsites accommodate only those with horses or other stock animals...") but it is tagged as a normal camp site. We have a tag for places where horseback riders can temporarily stay overnight with their horses: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism=trail_riding_station . I wonder why this is not used for such horse camps, not only in this case, but apparently in many others as well. Was there a discussion about this? Or is it because Carto doesn't render this tag? Or why?