piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ScottWalkerAU (2025-12-16 10:36:35+00:00): Also - since you use Esri imagery, you should adjust the imagery offset to match nearby existing features.
CartoElezen (2025-12-16 10:56:17+00:00): I used the square building button, but might have missed a few. And thanks for the top about the offset, that wasn't mentioned in any of the short tutorials I looked at. I'll definitely keep that in mind for the future.
ScottWalkerAU (2025-12-16 11:01:28+00:00): Bing seems to be the most accurate imagery locally for offsetting against.
You may need to adjust the offset of other imagery - like Esri - multiple times if you move 100m away (or notice an image stitch where roads shift around)!
osmviborg (2025-12-16 11:33:12+00:00): Gider du læse op på begrebet 'parking_aisle', du bruger det forkert: https://lgms.nl/p/osm/cached-wiki/?page=Tag:service%3Dparking_aisle
JoeG (2025-12-31 00:22:38+00:00): Hi! I intend to revert deletion of fences and footway=sidewalk in this one.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175993878
BCNorwich (2025-12-18 06:56:50+00:00): Duplicated highway sections removed.
Dimitar155 (2026-01-05 11:04:51+00:00): Може ли да подредите магазините в Кауфланд, както би следвало да са разположени вътре? Обикновена са в една или две редици.

За пример вижте другия Кауфланд в Люлин - https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=20/42.7256771/23.2418372 или банишорския - https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=19/42.711380/23.302661
Anonymous36863 (2026-02-05 11:49:04+00:00): Да
HellMap (2025-12-16 16:49:14+00:00): Sveiki,

Šeit jau bija norādīts `alt_name=Aknīstes pilskalns`. Divus nosaukumus iekš `name` nenorāda. Ja pamata/galvenais nosaukums ir "Aknīstes", tad tos var apmainīt vietām.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name#Multiple_names
Anrijs Terauds (2025-12-16 20:48:15+00:00): Sveiciens. Sēļu pilskalnu sarakstā  Aknīstes (Susējas) pilskalns, Kultūras mantojuma sarakstā ir Susējas (Aknīstes) pilskalns.
richlv (2025-12-19 20:28:14+00:00): Tad vienu atstājam alt_name. Ja nav domstarpību, var brīvi izvēlēties, kuru :)
Fizzie-DWG (2025-12-25 03:43:28+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19217
NeisBot (2025-12-16 18:26:28+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Gabinet fizjoterapii w Zabrzu"
---
Na przykład, bardziej neutralna i obiektywna wersja Twojego opisu mogłaby brzmieć: "Gabinet fizjoterapii w Zabrzu"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
bartgron (2025-12-16 21:19:32+00:00): Opis został usunięty, pozdrawiam serdecznie
pitscheplatsch (2025-12-17 05:52:55+00:00): Danke, bartgron 👍
Sanniu (2026-03-11 09:14:59+00:00): Hi, it look like that the path forward and backward pass on the same trail, but you draw different lines that cross one another. Can you unite the lines that pass on the same trail?
Yanivdu (2026-03-12 06:27:22+00:00): Hi, I did this to create a continues "Bergerim" MTB trail, otherwise it will break it to small pieces.
Sanniu (2026-03-12 06:40:27+00:00): Hi. You can make the relation from it - this is the recommended way to sustain trails.
julcnx (2025-12-16 12:03:29+00:00): Thank you for your contributions! Please remember to upload your traces publicly to OSM so they appear in the OSM Public GPS Traces layer, enabling verification and future alignment or improvements. Thank you!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175995891
hiker628 (2025-12-16 12:29:59+00:00): ok I do now
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-12-17 13:38:17+00:00): Hi!

Can you explain the rationale to remove this transiiton from dual carriageway to single?

Now for a car driving from South to North, the router will say: turn left on Rodolphe-Pagé, then turn right on Stuart-Graham, which is not what people understand, it should just say: continue north on Stuart-Graham. So I think the transition was correct.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-12-17 14:22:04+00:00): I fixed the issue by merging before the intersection. Thanks!
sbedwal_Lyft (2025-12-19 09:14:08+00:00): 
Hi ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy,

My name is Santosh & I am the mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. 
Thank you very much for noticing the issue and correcting it. Regarding my edits: I removed the segment because there was no physical separation and converted it from dual to single carriageway, but I missed fixing the connection with restrictions. I completely agree with your correction. Please accept my apologies.
I apologize for any inconvenience my changes may have caused and will be more careful with future edits. Thanks again for taking the time to fix this.

Happy Mapping!
Regards,
Santosh
totera (2026-01-26 14:47:25+00:00): Ciao f_gonella, i landuse non devono comprendere percorsi stradali, ma devono fermarsi ai bordi di essi, vedi https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Land_use#Mapping_land_use_in_more_detail e https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse=residential#Separation_from_roads
f_gonella (2026-05-12 15:56:41+00:00): Grazie! Corretto questo e sto gradualmente correggendo gli altri mappati in questo modo
enzo_immergis (2026-01-07 15:40:10+00:00): Bonjour Pierre,
Pourquoi avoir ajouté cycleway=shared_lane sur le way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4650458 ?

Il y a des pictos vélo ?
Si c'est le cas, il manque cycleway:lane=pictogram : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:cycleway%3Dshared_lane

Sinon cycleway:both=no. 

Bonne journée,
Enzo
enzo_immergis (2026-01-07 15:54:23+00:00): Pour info, bicycle=yes n'est pas utile. 
Sinon on aurait pas fini de le mettre sur toutes les routes 😅

Et oneway=-1 n'est plus recommandé : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:oneway
"oneway=-1 (alternative non recommandée: "reverse")"
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1458974150

Ici je pense qu'il manque oneway:bicycle=no et cycleway:right:lane=pictogram
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/113525746/

Dis moi si tu veux que je fasse le ménage.
simon_geovelo (2026-01-08 08:51:16+00:00): oui, le bicycle=yes n'est pas utile. Chez Geovelo on ne l'enlève pas systématiquement quand il a été mis par un autre contributeur (dans ce cas il a été mis par Anonix35 en Aout 2024)
simon_geovelo (2026-01-08 08:56:10+00:00): Pour le cycleway:left:oneway=-1 sur https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/113525746/ c'est la nouvelle facon de taguer qui remplace le opposite_track https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/113525746/
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway:left:oneway
simon_geovelo (2026-01-08 09:02:59+00:00): Pour le way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/113525746/ le oneway:bicycle=no a été oublié. C'est corrigé ;-) (cela n'impacte pas nos export, mais c'est plus propre pour les autres contributeurs)
Pour le https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cycleway:right:lane=pictogram la page française du wiki indique qu'en France "cette distinction n’est pas nécessaire et n’apporte aucune information" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:cycleway:lane
enzo_immergis (2026-01-08 10:30:30+00:00): Un peu étrange d'utiliser cycleway:*:oneway=-1 alors que oneway=-1 est déconseillé
Le plus simple serait peut-être de mapper la PC séparément ? 

Il semble y avoir une confusion dans cette page alors : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:cycleway%3Dshared_lane

Il parle de mettre cycleway=shared_lane + cycleway:lane=advisory en cas de chaucidou, mais le bon combo est cycleway=lane + cycleway:lane=advisory (en France).
"Cet attribut peut être utilisé dans le cas d'une chaussée à voie centrale banalisée ou chaucidou (CVCB).
Dans ce cas, il faut alors utiliser cette valeur d'attribut : cycleway:lane=advisory"

Ducoup en France shared_lane induit forcément une seule valeur (picto).
Mais je préfère continuer à le mettre puisque cela rend l'info explicite pour tous.

Certains contributeurs interprètent shared_lane comme "route où les vélos et les voitures peuvent rouler ensemble". Alors que par défaut c'est le cas.
Du coup, rajouter cycleway:lane=pictogram me semble bien plus explicite pour signifier que shared_lane désigne les pictogrammes au sol.
simon_geovelo (2026-01-08 13:45:24+00:00): le oneway -1 est déconseillé car moins explicite. pour le https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cycleway:*:oneway=-1 dans la nouvelle façon de cartographier il y a pas le choix car la bande est a contre sens et le oneway est à yes. Il ya des cas ou la bande est a gauche dans le sens des voiture comme ici par exemple https://api.panoramax.xyz/?focus=pic&map=19.48/47.4036456/0.6835314&pic=e2ec3656-18a5-44a3-a4ea-a3c7dc0c01d6&speed=250&theme=age&xyz=356.86/-17.81/30
Vétérini (2026-01-09 19:59:22+00:00): Bonjour à tous,

Je rajoute mon grain de sel pour dire que ce n'est pas oneway=-1 qui est "non recommandé" dans le wiki FR, c'est oneway=reverse (tout comme oneway=1 ou oneway=true sont cités en alternatives déconseillés à oneway=yes), les formulations de la page ne sont pas extrêmement claires.

Le wiki EN dit simplement :
"If the oneway restriction is in the opposite direction to the drawn way, the fix in most cases is to turn the way around ("reverse way" tool in the map editors) and apply oneway=yes. If in a (very) rare case, the direction of the way cannot be changed, you can instead tag it as oneway=-1." La remarque est valable pour oneway=*, mais du coup pas pour des attributs cycleway:*:oneway=-1 pour indiquer une bande à contre-sens du sens de circulation "normal" de la rue
bartgron (2025-12-16 21:37:27+00:00): Drzewo zostało usunięte ponieważ stanowiło duplikat (są tam dodane drzewa jako obszar).
Pozdrawiam
NeisBot (2025-12-16 18:19:53+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 13 potential crossings.

Problematic elements (top 3 by category):
https://osm.org/way/39344276 v16 | 5 crossings
https://osm.org/way/376102342 v3 | 5 crossings
https://osm.org/way/376170601 v7 | 3 crossings

Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/7968491123 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=175996263
bartgron (2025-12-16 21:42:29+00:00): Zestaw zmian wycofany z powodu poważnych błędów:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176024706
Pozdrawiam
pitscheplatsch (2025-12-17 05:52:34+00:00): Danke, bartgron 👍
eggie (2025-12-16 10:34:26+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Alle begin is moeilijk. Er liggen nu twee voetpaden op elkaar. We noemen da duplicated ways. Het is geen sidewalk, want geen langsliggendtrottoir.
Maak ook altijd een verbindingsnode met kruisende paden. Het zal anders niet routeren.
Ik zal even wat aanpassen.
Dit waren je edits: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=175996574

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-12-16 10:38:21+00:00): Crossing en duplicated ways verwijderd.
Het lijkt erop dat je de weg heen- en terug hebt ingetekend zonder het 'potlood' van het papier te halen.
Ik heb het aangepast.
rskedgell (2025-12-16 17:59:08+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap.

If you have a path which is tagged as highway=footway then adding bicycle=no and horse=no isn't necessary as that's implicit in the UK. It doesn't do any harm to add these tags, but they're unlikely to have any effect on routing software. The exception is where a prohibition is explicitly signed, in which case you can make this clear by also adding bicycle:signed=no (the StreetComplete surveying app does this).

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#United_Kingdom
rskedgell (2025-12-16 18:00:36+00:00): * Sorry! You'd add bicycle:signed=yes as well as bicycle=no where there's an explicit and signed prohibition.
Luzandro (2025-12-16 11:33:24+00:00): Hallo,

die Fußwege bitte mit der Fahrbahn verbinden und nicht daneben enden lassen (bzw. nicht mit landuse-Grenzen verbinden), ansonsten kann darüber nicht geroutet werden.

Hausdurchgänge können als tunnel=building_passage erfasst werden

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:tunnel%3Dbuilding_passage

Ich habe das jetzt schon entspr. geändert
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175996817
amosharper (2025-12-16 13:40:54+00:00): Hello - I've slightly tweaked this in changeset 176006316 as it's clear from Strava Heatmaps that it does get some foot use, and the way is visible on Bing, Esri, and Mapbox satellite imagery (ground truth).

I've left it as access=no since it's not a PRoW and there's no evidence of permissive access, but I've changed informal to yes based on the evidence of usage. This last change might be a bit dubious now that it has highway=track rather than highway=footway?
WPF Westfield (2025-12-16 14:18:55+00:00): There is no right of way here, however there is a track caused by sheep walking through and vehicles (quad bike, Gator, tractor, Land Rover etc) driving through.
amosharper (2025-12-17 00:06:12+00:00): Understood, but it does exist on the ground, has recently been used even if there's no permitted right of way as evidenced by Strava Heat Maps, and the tagging (with rskedgell's correction) does indicate that public use is not permitted. The tags right now recognise its existence, occasional usage, and the fact that it's private. Good routing applications will no longer send people along it.

There's a good page on the pros and cons here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Illegal_paths
mueschel (2025-12-20 09:10:45+00:00): Hi,
what does "wine_tourism" mean? This tag isn't used in any other place.
eggie (2025-12-16 10:41:23+00:00): Lijkt me oke .. Er is alleen een boom aan de wandel gegaan. Weet niet of dart de bedoeling was.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=175997169


Meestal gebeurt dat door schuiven met de kaart in editmodus. 
Gr eggie
Pr166 (2025-12-16 11:05:10+00:00): nee, die wandelende boom was niet de bedoeling :-)
eggie (2025-12-16 11:29:28+00:00): Nou.. waar die terecht kwam staat er toevallig ook eentje. :)
eggie (2025-12-16 11:30:16+00:00): Op de IJsvogel (kruising) overlappen de wegen
Ik pas het wel aan.
StC (2025-12-19 20:36:57+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre qui passe par là. Je m'occupe de la réparation.
a-shaklunov (2026-01-01 18:24:35+00:00): The number is in deed 57 but the name of the street is different. According to maps.gov.ge it is ივანე ჯავახიშვილის ქუჩა
evgenykatyshev (2026-01-08 08:35:40+00:00): Changed
eggie (2025-12-16 12:54:54+00:00): Dag Marco,

Maak er geen gewoonte van om motor_vehicle=no te taggen op paaltjes. Dat hoeft niet.
Hier is sprake van een footway. daar routeren ook geen tweewielers.
Wanneer je er mag fietsen dan highway=path taggen ipv footway.

MVG
eggie
kohiwonomu (2025-12-16 15:02:54+00:00): It looks like you may have accidentally modified a few features you may not have intended to (way #354646875 and node #356818297). Make sure you review your changeset before uploading to ensure that only the node you intended to change is being modified. Let me know if you need help reverting the changes.
schobbish (2025-12-16 19:33:54+00:00): Additionally, the street name should be Capitalized and the abbreviation expanded.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175998341
DFW-Backyard7 (2025-12-18 07:31:52+00:00): Reverted this changeset in whole because it has nonsensical data in a nonsensical place and also messed up a church geometry. It's not a hospital, the listed address is nowhere near the POI position (which itself is in a seemingly random spot without a business).

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176080554
NorthCrab_upload (2025-12-18 04:22:40+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1175601903

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
hobbesvsboyle (2026-01-10 21:37:12+00:00): Ich habe den Namen entfernt und das Tag als razed:highway=track gesetzt, damit niemand den Weg wieder hinzufügt.
eggie (2025-12-16 10:45:58+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback... De info heb ik overgezet naar de adresnode. Je hoeft ook geen adressen toe te voegen in OSM en je kunt bijtaggen op de adresnodes.

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
NeisBot (2025-12-16 18:26:46+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Prime Storage Ajax at 20 Pugsley Court"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-12-18 09:51:44+00:00): ❌ Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/176040511
trial (2025-12-21 20:48:44+00:00): Morbihan Habitat un club échangiste ? Il n'y a pas comme une erreur ?
De plus merci de laisser les adresses sur les points d'adresse et pas sur les point d'intérêts. On place les points d'adresse comme le cadastre au niveau de la limite public/privé et les points d'intérêt au milieu du bâti.
Ça a plusieurs intérêts, notamment de laisser les adresses visibles et d'éviter de les enlever quand le commerce disparaît.
trial (2025-12-21 21:07:03+00:00): Et pour Vannes, que ce soit deux bâtiments, ce n'est pour autant qu'une agence, sachant que Morbihan Accession occupe les mêmes locaux (pour de bonnes raisons). Et le bâtiment ne porte pas ce nom.
building=service : Bâtiment de service. Habituellement un petit édifice sans nom avec une certaine machinerie (comme une pompe, un transformateur,...). 	
Non, building=yes ou office : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:building
Dvorný (2025-12-16 11:15:53+00:00): Všechny odstraněné zahrady byly ručně zkontrolovány.
OneMoreSCAccount (2025-12-16 11:34:12+00:00): Привіт друже. Ти щось дивне робиш. Для початку ознайомся з правилами найменування вулиць, яке прийняла спільнота. Якщо назва - прикметник, то слово "вулиця" пишемо в кінці. Глянь по сусідніх вулицях, до прикладу на Старонаводницькій, Редутній
OneMoreSCAccount (2025-12-16 11:35:42+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:%D0%90%D0%B4%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%B8#%D0%92%D0%B8%D0%B7%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%87%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8F_%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BA%D0%B2%D1%96%D0%B7%D0%B8%D1%82%D1%83_%D0%B0%D0%B4%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%B8_%C2%AB%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0_%D0%B2%D1%83%D0%BB%D0%B8%D1%86%D1%96%C2%BB
eggie (2025-12-16 11:14:11+00:00): Het gebouw heb ik weer hersteld. Alle gebouwen zijn directe import vanuit de BAG (Kadaster) Svp niet splitsen.
Ook svp geen bedrijfsnamen op de gebouwomtrekken.
Gebruik de adresnodes met een company tag.

MVG
eggie
YomanNH (2026-01-15 08:34:01+00:00): Obszary dróg/chodników to area:highway=*. Nie mapuj ich jako area=yes + highway=*.
eggie (2025-12-16 11:02:24+00:00): Beste Mombarg   Eén keer een bedrijf taggen is eenduidiger. Gebruik ook indien mogelijk de adresnodes.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-12-16 11:23:08+00:00): Wellicht heb je hier wat aan.
https://viewer.satellietdataportaal.nl/@52.33676,5.056919,19/?datastrip=20251117_PNEO-04

Dat enorme gebouw heb ik verwijderd.
Wanneer er een bord fietspad staat dan tag je het als G13 fietspad.
Dus met moped=no, mofa=no, traffic_sign=NL:G13
Pr166 (2025-12-16 13:01:29+00:00): Leuk, dat is wel heel recente satellietdata!
eggie (2025-12-16 13:04:34+00:00): Yep...  Die satelliet vliegt elke keer over en dat wordt direct bijgewerkt in het portaal. Soms helaas bewolkt maar dan ga je een week terug.
De beelden mogen we gebruiken.
eggie (2025-12-16 10:57:02+00:00): Het bedrijf staat al in de database bij het kantoor.
Svp geen adressen toevoegen. Er is een adresnode.
Het gebouwtje heb ik ook aangepast.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-12-16 11:11:59+00:00): Dit is oke.  Je zou evt wel het hele terrein kunnen intekenen als vlak met man_made=works
name=.....
product=concrete

'Dan zie je gewoon 1x een naam los van het kantoor. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-12-16 13:16:29+00:00): Jeroen,

Ik heb wat bedrijven met de naam toegevoegd . Zal zo even naar de wegen kijken.
eggie (2025-12-16 13:33:55+00:00): Jeroen,

Wegen heb ik aangepast.
Op de luchtfoto os het goed te zien. 
Het terrein van het bedrijf ook als man_made=works

Die bedrijfslocaties zijn niet erg eenduidig, want welke keuze moet je dan maken?
GRoet,
eggie
eggie (2025-12-16 13:34:32+00:00): CTRL-F5 voor het effect. Cache leegmaken.
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2025-12-16 15:18:26+00:00): Aynı konuda tarafınıza 2 kez yazmıştım. Herhangi bir cevap vermediniz. Yolların hem ref=* hem de old_ref=* etiketine tıpatıp aynı değerleri yazıyorsunuz. Aynı değeri hem ref=* 'e hem de old_ref=* 'e yazmayınız.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175153787#c1517690

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175154889#c1517691
Supaplex030 (2025-12-19 13:27:57+00:00): Hey, kleiner Hinweis zum Parken auf dem Mittelstreifen: Da sollte "location=median" (nicht "medium" ;-) an der separaten Fläche auf dem Mittelstreifen ergänzt werden (parking=street_side). Stattdessen hattest du es an den Straßenlinien mit parking:left:location ergänzt, was sich nicht gut auswerten lässt. Habe es bereits angepasst: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176140786
fmc_5 (2025-12-19 17:01:33+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. :-)
Tinu Schmid (2025-12-16 17:29:59+00:00): mueschel, bitte diesen Änderungssatz rückgängig machen.
Wie kann das Attribut mit dem Wiki verhängt werden?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:functional_road_class
mueschel (2025-12-16 18:31:25+00:00): Tags wie diese an einem einzelnen Objekt sind normalerweise ein klares Zeichen, dass fremde Daten importiert wurden und vergessen wurde tags richtig anzupassen. 
Neue Keys sollten der allgemeinen Form entsprechen, z.B. kein CamelCase
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Any_tags_you_like#How_to_name_new_tags

Was spricht gegen schon etablierte Tags, z.B. das in Polen übliche https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:highway:category:pl

Da es sich hier sicherlich um eine lokale Einordnung handelt, sollte das am Tag auch klar erkennbar sein.

Da die Klassifizierung von Straßen ein sehr weitreichendes Problem ist (das auch schon häufig diskutiert wurde), sollte es zunächst im Forum besprochen werden.
FajrAl (2025-12-17 12:23:20+00:00): Hi, reminder that #hotosm-project-37395 is for building mapping only. Thanks!
Jrachi (2026-04-08 06:10:03+00:00): Ciao.
Se questa relazione è route=hiking, il tag worship=stations_of_the_cross non ha più significato.
Meglio cancellarlo se non è un route=worship

Ivo
Marco Tamburini (2026-04-08 10:38:42+00:00): Ciao Ivo,
non avevo notato il tag worship

Cosa consiglieresti di fare?
Due relazioni distinte, una per la via crucis con le relative edicole e una per l'escursionismo?
Jrachi (2026-04-08 12:33:31+00:00): Non conosco, ma se effettivamente è una via crucis è giusto avere una seconda relazione route=worship
Ivo
Marco Tamburini (2026-04-08 14:32:09+00:00): Verifico e aggiorno

Grazie
Ruslan Fatih (2025-12-17 18:46:03+00:00): Зачем вы удалили все данные и заммапили их заново?
stasiu512 (2025-12-16 22:31:19+00:00): Cześć, widziałeś oznakowanie w terenie? Jesteś pewny że nie jest to chodnik z dopuszczonym ruchem rowerowym?