piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Paul Berry (2023-11-24 20:29:53+00:00): Moved a node that had always been on the wrong continent.
Dimitar155 (2025-07-30 06:48:21+00:00): Привет Боби,

Тук има отбелязани два клона на Инвестбанк. Мисля, че единият от тях би трябвало да е централният им офис, но не съм сигурен дали на същото място нямат и клон за обслужване на клиенти. Запознат ли си дали това е така?

Поздрави,
Митко
Boyan Alexiev (2025-07-31 13:07:45+00:00): Според мен и двата обекта са дублирани и единия трябва ад се изчисти.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/208387757
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3066437185

Относно обслужване на клиенти - не зная. Ще проверя и ще ти върна отговор.
Dimitar155 (2025-07-31 20:12:14+00:00): Под централен офис имах предвид корпоративен офис. В сайта си са го написали "централно управление" и са сложили някакво работно време - https://ibank.bg/bg/klonova-mreja. Отделно на покрива има надпис "ibank".
Arturo Francisco Barbero (2023-11-27 10:59:20+00:00): Sería interesante comentar en WikiOSM el caso de algunas carreteras/calles de pueblos del alfoz como este caso que presentan características terciarias a pesar de no contar con etiquetado.
eggie (2023-11-24 20:33:26+00:00): Dag Gerth   Dat lijkt me inderdaad beter zo.
MVG
eggie
MxxCon (2023-11-25 21:12:06+00:00): Hello.
Please split your edits grouped into smaller geographic regions, such as one neighborhood at a time. Or a city at a time at most. There's no need for this edit to stretch from NYC to Stony Point.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144420215
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-11-24 20:15:51+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 124150175, 124451552.
citrula (2023-11-24 21:21:54+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You can press "Q" in iD to square the corners of the buildings you map.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144420810
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-11-24 20:32:49+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 87547584, 87547595, 87547622.
Dawid2849 (2023-11-24 23:13:50+00:00): Dzięki!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-11-24 20:45:51+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 81687884, 81688972, 81689420, 81738783.
CurlingMan13 (2023-11-25 06:27:20+00:00): I am pretty sure I have left changeset comments addressing this same issue, so please stop:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#:~:text=Wrapping%20polygon%20areas%20around%20a%20hole%20and%20leaving%20a%20tiny%20open%20gap.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144421195
BPTT (2025-01-17 16:07:09+00:00): I think it'd be more accurate to change the access tags for closed slip lanes to all=no, since they weren't designed or built to be pedestrian streets. Doing so wouldn't prevent algorithmic routing to/from the crosswalk. Also, it's possible that without all=no, the roadway itself will still render on some map services and indicate to drivers that they could still use it. as a roadway. It exists, but it's closed pending removal, so I think all=no is the best option. Curious what you think too.
huntertur (2025-01-22 15:29:01+00:00): Hello, I've learned in the year since this changeset to just use access=no for slip lane closures, since that looks to be the norm of other mappers.
spughetti (2023-11-25 02:11:00+00:00): 👏👏👏
habi (2023-11-25 11:37:25+00:00): Ciao Aquilaranger

Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap!
Schön machst du hier mit und hilfst, die Karte und die Kartendaten zu pflegen.

Wenn du ein Gebäude anpasst, kannst du anschliessend die Q-Taste drücken, um das Gebäude rechtwinklig zu machen.

E Gruess usem Liebifäud,
habi
habi (2023-11-25 13:46:11+00:00): In https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144441450 habe ich diese kleinen Korrekturen gemacht.
Olga | Yanosik (2023-11-28 10:24:45+00:00): Czy ul. Kosmonautów/Średzka, czyli dawny przebieg DK 94 przez Leśnicę nie powinien być obniżony do tertiary? Nawigacje jakoś nie bardzo chcą prowadzić obwodnicą a droga przez Leśnicę miała stać się ulicą lokalną.
szalona_entropia (2023-11-28 11:13:04+00:00): Może tak być.
Olga | Yanosik (2023-11-28 11:42:11+00:00): Ok, to zedytuję.
rskedgell (2023-11-26 12:15:44+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap and many thanks for adding this public footpath.

If you're mapping other public rights of way in this area, you might find this tool useful:
https://osm.mathmos.net/prow/progress/essex/chelmsford/south-hanningfield/
ceyu (2023-11-25 11:40:00+00:00): Hi, why did you change `highway=steps` to `highway=path` on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1226537218 ? According to the photo these are steps: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3519438
habi (2023-11-25 13:28:58+00:00): Ciao Aquilaranger
Ist der Stellplatz "offiziell", d.h. kann ich da jederzeit mit (m)einem Camper vorbeischauen?
Dann müsste das Ding in OpenStreetMap nicht als "grüne Wiese" [1],  sondern als https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:tourism%3Dcaravan_site eingetragen werden.
Schön wäre auch, wenn dann noch irgendwelche Kontaktdetails dazu wären, sowie auch, was allenfalls Camper:innen hier erwartet (Strom, Wasser, etc.)
Gruss,
habi

[1]: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:landuse%3Dmeadow
habi (2023-11-25 13:45:55+00:00): In https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144441450 habe die Wiese mal zu einem Stellplatz korrigiert.
Weitere Details könntest du allenfalls selber noch nachtragen, am einfachsten z.B. mit https://mapcomplete.org/campersite.html?z=19&lat=46.86918&lon=7.40582
tyfi (2023-11-24 21:45:09+00:00): There was also a segment in here accidentally tagged ref="MO E", so I changed that to ref="MO EE"
habi (2023-11-25 13:36:51+00:00): Ein Chrütergärtli könnte als `leisure=garden` anstatt eines Parks erfasst werden.
Zusätzlich z.B. noch mit garden:style=herb_garden :)

Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:garden:style
habi (2023-11-25 13:43:34+00:00): In https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144441450 habe ich diese kleinen Korrekturen gemacht,
e Gruess,
habi
aTarom (2023-11-25 07:27:02+00:00): Hola Sercontr, como source del changeset Google Maps?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google
Cuando puedas revisa estos elementos con tags
"localId"
"muncode"
"parts"
"type"
"zone"
en
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1226613099/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1226613100/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1226613101/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1226613102/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1226613103/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1226613104/history
Saludos
Sercontr (2023-11-25 09:00:51+00:00): Hola,

gracias por el aviso, no debo fiarme de la "revisión" de JOSM

Lo he corregido en el changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144433500

Un saludo
habi (2023-11-25 13:38:19+00:00): Der Friedhof https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1226614185 sollte nicht als Gebäude (building=yes) erfasst werden, sondern (korrekter) als `landuse=cemetery`.
habi (2023-11-25 13:43:43+00:00): In https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144441450 habe ich diese kleinen Korrekturen gemacht,
e Gruess,
habi
Carto'Cité (2023-12-30 08:18:54+00:00): Bonjour TranseForestière
Merci pour tes contributions sur les aménagements cyclables.

Un contributeur m'a fait remarquer que tu avais passé des voies vertes de path à unclassified. Alors oui la pratique est ok mais dans certaines conditions et j'ai l'impression qu'elles ne sont pas respectées ici. N’hésite pas à prendre contact avec les contributeurs pour vérifier avec eux ce type de modifications également 🙂

Si tu ne la connais pas encore, je t'invite à regarder de près cette page et les pages qui sont liées car la thématique vélo est une thématique complexe avec beaucoup de cas particuliers : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bicycle

Déjà s'il s'agit d'une voie verte on a probablement un panneau B7b ou un panneau C115. S'il y a des panneaux C113 ou B22a là la quesiton ne se pose pratiquement pas, ce sont des cycleway s'il n'y a pas un autre panneau qui le contre-dit.

Dans le cas d'une voie verte avec un panneau B7b ou un panneau C115, il faut :
– Préciser le panneau : traffic_sign=FR:C115/B7b
– La nature du highway est au cas par cas : path/track/service/unclassified voir footway pour les trottoirs par exemple
– Il faut préciser le motor_vehicle=no
– Et il ne faut pas mettre des bicycle=yes qui n'ont pas de sens mais bien un bicycle=designated pour le C115 ; pour le B7b on peut laisser bicycle=yes si aucun élément ne permet de préciser bicycle=designated mais ça n'apporte aucune information.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
Carto'Cité (2023-12-30 08:36:59+00:00): Voilà un élément que j'ai trouvé pour qualifier ce chemin :
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=136045965109652
La description en highway=cycleway était juste. En réalité cette signalétique n'a pas de valeur réglementaire mais elle se rapproche d'une signalétique piste cyclable C113 et aire piétonne B54. La situation est délicate car rien n'indique l'interdiction des véhicules à moteur mais peut-être que la largeur de la pseudo-barrière formée par les blocs en entrée implique cette interdiction. Je vais procéder à des modifications dans ce sens.
Charles
Carto'Cité (2023-12-30 08:38:51+00:00): Pour plus de clarté, je parle essentiellement de ces way mais je crois que tes modifications en ont concerné d'autres donc n’hésite pas à les corriger par toi-même si tu les retrouves 🙂
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/219535771
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1225235112
Charles
Carto'Cité (2023-12-30 08:52:53+00:00): Cette photo montre un panneau qui pourrait donner quelques informations utiles mais on ne peut rien lire :https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=2838115039781636
Si tu as l'occasion de venir ici et faire des photos géolocalisée avec un GoPro ou sur smartphone Android avec Open Camera un peu paramétré (c'est la meilleure application pour ça) tu peux ensuite les mettre dans Panoramax pour qu'on regarde :)
Charles
josmougn (2024-01-08 16:09:56+00:00): Salut Charles 
Si tu remonte le fil de https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=2838115039781636 on tombe sur le panneau pas très légal https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=136045965109652 (Oups, je viens de réaliser que tu avais déjà cité cette photo).
De plus les panneaux de jalonnement montrent clairement qu'on est sur un itinéraire cyclable, donc bicycle="designated" ou encore mieux "highway=cycleway" sans "foot=yes". Personnellement je considère que cycleway est une voie et donc j'ajoute sidewalk=right ou left ou both.
José
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-11-26 14:17:10+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11254589221/history - what you meant by shop=1 ?
danieldegroot2 (2023-11-24 22:51:05+00:00): Hey Conor Ryan and welcome,

Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap!

Your changes look good to me :-)

If you haven't yet, read more here
- Beginner's Guide
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide
- Good Practice
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice

For your information, the most important rule is to not copy data from Google Maps or any other proprietary / copyright content, without explicit permission. For the imagery in the editor applications we already have permission though.

If you need help mapping, have any questions, or just want to chat with other mappers, you can join the (local) community here:
https://openstreetmap.community/?map=53.26662,-7.78496&zoom=4.65
(left click on the country / place of interest, a list of contact channels will appear on the right side)

Regards,

Daniel
déni (2023-11-25 21:55:43+00:00): Ce n'est pas à mon avis un "welcome sign, l'affichage change très régulièrement et le plus souvent une publicité pour un évènement des PDS, comme ici par ex: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=46.13448716425&lng=6.6297954782552&z=19.780966530574446&pKey=391302765345538&focus=photo
Kalepom (2023-11-25 22:07:16+00:00): Salut Déni,
Je me suis basé sur Bing, l'imagerie de rue la plus récente (2021) sur cette portion. Le panneau semblait être fixe et indique "Portes du Soleil  - Bienvenue, Welcome", d'où le tag. Mais si tu as une connaissance terrain et que tu sais que le panneau change régulièrement, tu as raison, et je te laisse le mettre à jour ;)
déni (2023-11-25 22:14:51+00:00): Ok merci pour ta réponse et ta rapidité. Effectivement je passe souvent devant.
BCNorwich (2023-11-25 06:52:08+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Please remember to revert the change when the road re-opens.

Regards Bernard.
Nix Geek (2023-11-25 09:34:43+00:00): Thanks for the welcome

Will absolutely update it once it has opened again, and will also hopefully be able to update the layout etc as it's being totally re-aligned for house building
confusedbuffalo (2023-11-25 04:11:35+00:00): Thank you, however Google StreetView MUST not be used as a source for any edits. Their terms are clear on that, so it is copyright violation. That change, at least, will need to be redacted.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3615142
Moscovium115 (2023-11-25 10:21:25+00:00): Ah, sorry, what I mean is that anyone can confirm themselves that it is called that.  I live right by here so know it is called that.  I will redact it for clarity's sake.
cserpell (2023-11-25 23:38:50+00:00): Estimado, el lugar de esta barrio me parece equivocado, ya que aquí no hay casas.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144424415
cserpell (2023-11-25 23:40:53+00:00): Hola estimado, de dónde obtiene los nombres de las calles? Muchas gracias.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144424485
confusedbuffalo (2023-11-25 03:58:20+00:00): Thank you, but now there are two number 44s next to each other, is that really how it is, or do the later numbers need changing too?
Moscovium115 (2023-11-25 10:52:12+00:00): Yes, the later numbers likely need changing, I'll take a look next time I go past.
confusedbuffalo (2023-11-25 17:42:19+00:00): Thank you, I've opened https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4003342 just in case it gets forgotten about
NorthCrab_upload (2023-11-24 23:40:26+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/669290774
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1013543000

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
user_5359 (2023-11-26 08:10:37+00:00): Hallo! Bitte schau Dir mal https://www.osm.org/way/290055805/history an. Ich habe Dein Tippfehler vom Schlüssel sidewalk korrigiert. Aber Deine Angaben zum Seitenweg passen nicht.
sidewalk:right=yes
sidewalk=left
.
vicente lopez 2021 (2023-11-25 13:18:19+00:00): hola en villa nueva villa maria me podrás corregir el puente de ruta 2
Thierry1030 (2025-04-01 08:59:40+00:00): Dag Tom, het jaagpad maakt deel uit van de (toekomstige) fietssnelweg F1 die naar mijn weten in Zemst-Vilvoorde nog niet bewegwijzerd is (tussen Mechelen en Antwerpen wel).
Hier bestaat een relatie voor.
Het jaagpad zelf heeft GEEN straatnaam.
Is het mogelijk om de naam van het pad te verwijderen?
Tom Ameye (2025-04-02 19:31:36+00:00): D
Tom Ameye (2025-04-02 19:34:18+00:00): Dag Thierry, ik voeg heel wat toe aan OSM maar ik ben te digibeet om de geschiedenis van de wijzigingen in OSM te kunnen zien. Ben je zeker dat ik "Fietssnelweg F1" heb toegevoegd ? Het is mogelijk, maar ik weet het niet met zekerheid. Pas ook gerust aan zoals je denkt dat het moet zijn. mvg Tom
Thierry1030 (2025-04-02 20:31:01+00:00): prima, ondertussen aangepast!
Cookie_Lemur (2023-11-25 14:43:23+00:00): This border change is unfounded, no old Austro-Hungarian map can suddenly warrant a change to international borders that have been established since 1995. (Even though I'm obviously aware that the present-day border itself is based on the old aus-hun border)
Cookie_Lemur (2023-11-25 14:52:39+00:00): Dobar izvor je ovaj istraživački papir o Bilateralnim odnosima Srbije i Bosne i Hercegovine od Centra za evropske integracije, 35. strana pa nadalje:

https://media.cpes.org.rs/2019/09/Bilateralni-odnosi-Srbije-i-BiH.pdf

(A good source from the Center for european integration, in Serbo-Croatian, on the bilateral relations between Serbia and Bosnia and Hercegovina, which discusses Međurečje from page 35 onwards.)
ftcat (2023-11-26 06:54:35+00:00): H Martini,

Just want to point out that way 1226630102 is probably not connected to way 903013604 but a track that runs parallel to it. You will notice there is a large area of unorganized tracks  bordering an area of very obvious squared off organized ways, this is because this is a block of what is known as small scale or peasant farms (disorganized tracks) and a block of what are known as commercial farms. There will be a fence running along way 903013604 and the only reason it looks like it may be a more substantial highway is because there will be a cleared firebreak along the track along the fence line. This is the reason there may be 2 tracks running parallel, actually 1 either side of the fence. There is generally no connecting track but may be paths. If you go to node 8486642578, where way 1226628594 connects to way 903013604, you can see the parallel tracks and see that there is no connection. At node 6442890251 there is a unfenced area to give access for the utility company to the substation and there is an unclassified way where there is a connection to the the D176 and on into the small scale farms.
tyfi (2023-11-25 00:36:11+00:00): This is being done in preparation for reworking the concurrencies here and addressing my note #3999754 about the route relation being removed last year for Route B.
tyfi (2023-11-25 00:37:03+00:00): U.S. 60 Bus., MO B, and CR 253 (in name only, as road is state owned) are all concurrent for a stretch in Rogersville.
tyfi (2023-11-25 00:39:03+00:00): This changeset also introduced some yield signs and dead ends.
tyfi (2023-11-25 00:39:43+00:00): Correction: the route relation was not removed, but the ref tag on the ways was. I will add the route relation.
CjMalone (2023-11-26 10:20:23+00:00): Hey, just a heads up but you lost some address data in this edit. I've fixed it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144465459#map=19/33.46904/-112.22301
mebrooks01 (2023-11-25 01:27:26+00:00): Used aerial image shift based on local area survey and GPS cords I obtained  from the Old Butterfly Mine
mebrooks01 (2023-11-25 01:27:14+00:00): Used aerial image shift based on local area survey and GPS cords I obtained  from the Old Butterfly Mine
Frans S (2023-12-28 10:06:52+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Please do not upload every single building you map,
Collect them per task , check of issues and upload.
your mappings are not that accurate and not squared.
I reviewed a number of your changesets. They all show the same issues


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144426464
Haami (2023-11-25 01:38:17+00:00): *trunk link
Metzor (2023-11-25 13:51:15+00:00): Hi mrcmst,

Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-) 

One general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: 

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

 Why? Have a look at the section 
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
BS97n (2023-12-26 18:59:44+00:00): Woher hast du das mit der Streckenführung bis Merklinde? Im NVP von 2017 konnte ich nur was zu einer Verlängerung bis Cöppencastrop (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1622932) finden.
BS97n (2024-01-21 14:37:59+00:00): Wäre das tatsächlich bis Merklinde konkret geplant, würde es wohl hier drin stehen: https://sessionnet.krz.de/en-kreis/bi/getfile.asp?id=20904&type=do
Dort steht aber nichts von dieser interkommunalen Verbindung.
ForestFurnace (2023-11-25 03:22:03+00:00): Deleted "Mt. Vernon School" from the middle of the woods in Taylor Township. I could not find any evidence that it existed and it came from what appeared to be a large spam changeset in 2009 that has since had a number of its elements deleted by other users. (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/756644)
BS97n (2023-12-26 18:50:15+00:00): Durch das NSG soll keine Bahntrasse führen: https://www.o-sp.de/bochum/plan?pid=45116
Langlaeufer (2023-11-25 15:23:18+00:00): Please do not disconect crossings to optimize the routing.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144428237
Kovoschiz (2023-11-25 16:04:51+00:00): 1. Please don't use `=permit` for "Except with permit" in HK. It means at most `=private` almost every time. 
2. Please don't change `vehicle=` to `access=` . This means pedestrians are affected as well, without overriding.
silversurfer83 (2023-11-25 16:16:07+00:00): Gude :)

Die Ladestation, ist die für PKW oder für Fahrräder? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11374821293

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144429838
wermak (2023-11-25 22:05:18+00:00): Ladestation für PKW, https://www.goingelectric.de/stromtankstellen/Deutschland/Bad-Berleburg/Stedenhofstrasse-Stedenhofstrasse-2/64361/.
Auch Google Maps hat hierzu Bilder.

Schöne Grüße
pfffrwll (2024-01-08 16:15:20+00:00): these are two ponds not a cemetery
www.findagrave.com/cemetery/2611140/oak-grove-ame-church-cemetery
tyfi (2023-11-25 07:08:49+00:00): I also removed a duplicate label for Henderson, MO. I kept the older one.
tyfi (2023-11-25 07:09:05+00:00): Bounding box is large due to power lines as usual.
Baloo Uriza (2024-11-22 17:16:13+00:00): Might want to not fight the tools provided and consider following the templates to get the correct values in the future.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144431674
Andrea Musuruane (2023-11-25 08:44:05+00:00): Ciao. Per favore, puoi usare dei commenti significativi ai changeset? Scrivere "Precisazione" su tutti, non serve a niente. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144432337
Xvtn (2023-12-13 23:18:41+00:00): Looks good overall. Thanks for your contributions! Speed limits are valuable info for routing. 
For the 7-Eleven gas station, I see you changed that to amenity=marketplace. Was the gas station removed, looks like? The convenience store part is still there next to it on satellite imagery.
user_5359 (2023-11-28 08:49:14+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on my correction of https://www.osm.org/node/10565140365/history. Is there any thing missed?
lyctkel (2023-11-28 09:29:25+00:00): Hi user_5359,
thanks for finding and correcting my copy and paste error.
Everything looks good.
Regards
lyctkel
dpolovinkin (2023-11-25 08:51:30+00:00): домики у Пскова
rab (2023-11-30 18:50:52+00:00): Residential streets are not so crooked.
Almost always parallel to the gable end 
Bing is currently more up-to-date than ESRI