piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2024-12-22 20:58:56+00:00): Tip:
Die adressen verplaatsen komt door schuiven met de kaart. Je selecteert dan per abuis een node en gaat dan schuiven met de kaart. Niet de kaart schuift dan, maar de node.
jeslop (2025-01-31 10:28:02+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161971584
eggie (2024-12-22 21:31:19+00:00): Dag Wouter.. Je vraagt feedback
Wanneer het hier afgesloten is en aangeduid met art 461 wvs zou het correct kunnen zijn.
Realiseer je dat bezorgdiensten hier ook niet meer kunnen routeren.
MVG
eggie
Glassman (2024-12-23 20:43:49+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160514692
NorthCrab_upload (2024-12-22 20:31:06+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3367872547
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1076804364

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-28 17:41:48+00:00): Hello!

You used
healthcare:speciality=osteopathy;
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12442292751/history

Have you maybe meant
healthcare:speciality=osteopathy
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
eggie (2024-12-22 21:36:05+00:00): Dag Wouter.. Het ligt er aan wat er aangegeven staat vooraan. 
Het routeert hier niet meer voor bv bezorgdiensten.
MVG
eggie
Wouterva (2024-12-23 06:43:10+00:00): Dank voor het meekijken. Hoe kan dit het beste worden aangegeven (zodat ik dat ook weet voor toekomstige wijzigingen)? Deze weg is 's avonds en in het weekend afgesloten met een hek dus volledig open is het niet. Er staat niet bij wanneer het hek open gaat. Groet, Wouter
eggie (2024-12-23 06:57:13+00:00): Tja... het kan op meer manieren.
Eigen Terrein kun je duiden met access=permissive... dat routeert.
Op de hekken zou je de openingstijden kunnen zetten. ... opening_hours=....

Maar ja welke tijden... 
Zou het gewoon bij permissive laten. Dan blijft het routeren.
Groet..
eggie
rhhs (2024-12-23 11:22:19+00:00): Thanks! That area is next on my to-do list for survey (after the holidays probably)
Zaunhänger (2024-12-26 11:09:12+00:00): Hi Sieda, was war an 48A und B falsch? Ich bin mir doch recht sicher, dass das da so dran steht. MfG
eggie (2024-12-22 21:34:19+00:00): Dag Wouter.. Lijkt me correct, maar de straatnaam Hill Street lijkt me onjuist.
Dat zal geen officieel uitgegeven straatnaam zijn. 
gr eggie
eggie (2024-12-22 21:39:04+00:00): Straatnaam verwijderd. Wellicht heeft men zelf een bordje opgehangen?
Wouterva (2024-12-23 06:40:24+00:00): Er staat geen bordje. Alleen op open street map stond deze naam. Lijkt me dus het beste inderdaad om te verwijderen.
Glassman (2024-12-23 20:46:01+00:00): Stop signs typically require a direction tag if it isn't a four way stop. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dstop for help with adding the direction tag.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160515184
blueblistering barnacles (2024-12-23 21:08:37+00:00): Thank you; added direction tags!
Jordi MF (2024-12-22 23:34:34+00:00): Hola Josepvc,

Te paso un enlace en el que aprece cómo la AVL (y por tanto, el ICV) catalogan el "Coll de la Serra" como un collado o puerto:
https://visor.gva.es/visor/?extension=750845,4438981,751016,4439060&nivelZoom=20&capasids=Topografico;,0103_NTV;&tcapas=1.0,1.0

Para verlo, activa la capa del "Nomenclàtor Toponímic Valencià" y haz clic encima del topónimo (también puedes buscarlo en buscador).

Si se cataloga como place=locality, es como si mapeando un paraje o partida deshabitado. Por eso considero más conveniente catalogarlo con una etiqeuta que represente mejor el elemento geográfico como natural=saddle.

Saludos
mohsen1369 (2024-12-26 09:51:18+00:00): ارسال بار دربستی به تمام نقاط کشور دارن
b-jazz (2024-12-26 15:00:29+00:00): The translation of your comment to English makes zero sense, so you’re going to have to translate this for me or I can’t help you.
mohsen1369 (2025-02-11 15:00:57+00:00): ایم مکان باز و فعل است
𒂼𒄄　 (2024-12-23 01:38:22+00:00): لماذا قمت بتغيير الاسم العام من العربي الى الكردي؟    
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2482441651/history
Marek-M (2024-12-23 08:59:25+00:00): Jeżeli nazwą tego mostu jest "Wędrujący most" to w atrybucie `name` należy ją zapisywać bez cudzysłowów. Poprawiłem tutaj: https://www.osm.org/changeset/160528771
Fizzie-DWG (2025-01-27 02:38:31+00:00): DWG revert - Google Maps used as Source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161801918
eggie (2024-12-23 07:20:17+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Deedback Alle begin is moeilijk.
Je zet een adres op het gebouw, maar er zijn al adresnodes en ook meer dan het genoemde adres.
Je maakt van één gebouw een restaurant (zonder naam)  Dat lijkt me niet kloppen. Er zitten tal van bedrijven hier.
Verder nooit naar de daken kijken en dan gebouwen aanpassen. Jet zijn schuin genomen luchtfoto's. Het lijkt me beter dat ik je aanpassingen terugdraai.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=160516562
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-12-23 07:23:48+00:00): reverted by changeset #160526221
silversurfer83 (2024-12-23 16:14:14+00:00): Moin matze :)

zwei kleine Hinweise für dich:

- wenn du ein Objekt, welches rechteckig sein soll, fertig hast, kannst du es mit der Taste "Q" schön rechteckig machen. (analoges gilt für runde Objekte und die Taste "O")

- Wenn du neue Häuser einzeichnest könntest die vielleicht direkt auch die Adresse erfassen. Ist häufig schon im ALKIS hinterlegt. Alternativ einfach gucken, wie in dem Ort die Adressen vergeben werden und extrapolieren. In solchen Fällen dann ein "fixme=Adresse geschätzt" hinterlassen.

happy mapping
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160516643
IvanBabić (2024-12-29 13:40:32+00:00): Reverted because of an unnecessary split #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160750742
JakovBušić (2025-01-17 18:09:28+00:00): Reverted because of the wrong input #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161465978
𒂼𒄄　 (2024-12-23 01:40:31+00:00): هذا تخريب!! اسم القرية باللغة العربية هو تل داوود لماذا قمت بتغيير اسمها العام الى اسم كردي وحتى الاسم العربي جعلته مترجم من اللغة الكردية!؟ هذا تخريب توقف عن ذلك!
cyton (2025-11-01 11:19:01+00:00): Siehe Note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3665486
woodpeck_repair (2024-12-29 09:48:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 160742400 where the changeset comment is: revert unexplained building deletion/adding of zoning data in Colombia, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17016
jumaka (2025-07-16 13:33:04+00:00): Hi. I don't know anything about the industrial area labelled Chapel pill community. Is the name and area on any official documents?
SeasnaiIs (2025-07-20 14:25:27+00:00): The name seems nonexistant. As for the area, the closest I can find are proposals for housing developments that roughly fit the area
jumaka (2025-07-21 18:30:00+00:00): Agree - there are no planning applications  and it is not industrial.
SeasnaiIs (2025-07-24 01:06:41+00:00): Remove? No matter proposals, the area is clearly not currently industrial
woodpeck_repair (2024-12-29 09:48:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 160742400 where the changeset comment is: revert unexplained building deletion/adding of zoning data in Colombia, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17016
woodpeck_repair (2024-12-29 09:48:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 160742400 where the changeset comment is: revert unexplained building deletion/adding of zoning data in Colombia, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17016
jb54osm (2024-12-22 23:13:25+00:00): Dag FM,

Dit zijn anderhalve stoeptegels om te voorkomen dat bestuurders de schuttingen van omwonenden kapot rijden. Ik verwijder deze 'voetpaden'.
silversurfer83 (2024-12-23 16:16:55+00:00): Hi :)

ich schon wieder. Bezeichnungen wie K, L, B und BAB kommen bei OSM in das Feld "ref=*" und dort ist K75 schon erfasst. Daher ist der name an dieser Stelle leider nicht korrekt erfasst.

Grüße
silversurfer83

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160544687
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160517543
woodpeck_repair (2024-12-29 09:48:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 160742400 where the changeset comment is: revert unexplained building deletion/adding of zoning data in Colombia, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17016
EneaSuper (2024-12-23 13:02:17+00:00): Ciao, temo che il valore living_street non sia consentito in Italia.

Per caso questo tratto di strada è pedonale?
kasteddaiu (2024-12-25 01:08:57+00:00): Ciao! Il tratto ufficialmente è pedonale (ma aperto al carico/scarico in determinati orari), anche se molti non lo rispettano. Leggevo adesso che living_street non è consentito per l'italia. A questo punto credo che questo tratto sia da classificare direttamente pedonale, come il Corso e Via Angioy. Che ne pensi? Io sono da poco su Osm e vedo che hai molta più esperienza di me
EneaSuper (2024-12-25 17:38:03+00:00): Ciao e buon Natale 🎄❤️

Capisco la situazione, comunque sì, living_street come dicevo non è consentito in Italia e che, quindi, pedestrian sia il valore più corretto da implementare.

Sono mappatore dal 2015 😊
kasteddaiu (2024-12-26 03:16:02+00:00): Perfetto, grazie! A te ;)
mcliquid (2024-12-23 08:25:28+00:00): Referenz: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/passstrassen-in-osterreich-ein-neuer-mochte-sein-erstes-projekt-vorstellen/105259/38
NorthCrab_upload (2024-12-22 22:41:19+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2602396860
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/361581290

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
silversurfer83 (2024-12-23 17:51:19+00:00): Hi :)

access=no schließt kategorisch alles aus. Ist das so? Sind die Wege abgesperrt? Wenn nicht ist "private" die naheliegendere Möglichkeit

Details:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160517755
yelisey90 (2024-12-23 08:02:59+00:00): Hi! Elements such as this one: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1344893092 are not routable. So with your edit you actually disconnected https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1175573366 & https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1175573367 , the software won't be able to create a route between them. One of them needs to go all the way trough the parking area (the road most likely).
pavel_shu (2024-12-23 12:10:15+00:00): Got it 👍
yelisey90 (2024-12-24 07:54:17+00:00): That's great!)
Are you going to do something about this? The ways mentioned above are still disconnected, and now also these two: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1345105144 & https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1176483578 . Is it possible to drive from one to the other? If yes, they should be connected.
VictorIE (2026-05-01 07:21:11+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1250091749/

start_date=2021, but year_of_construction=Late 2000s

I imagine that this dates from when they built the cycleway / bridge across the canal about 15 years ago.
PluMGMK (2026-05-02 19:45:55+00:00): Quite possibly! I think I copied those tags from the substation itself, which is visible on imagery going back to 2013 but didn't actually start being used until 2021…
Tatti Barletta (2024-12-23 08:12:33+00:00): Please take a look at the wiki page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:border_type
It makes no sense setting border_type.
Loren Maxwell (2024-12-23 11:13:23+00:00): On that page, under Country specific / United States, border_type=state corresponds to admin_level-4.

14 of the states had border_type tags, 36 did not.  Every county, parish, and borough in the US have a border_type tag, and in the forum we've discussed that every boundary=administrative should have a border_type tag.

This also allows easy filtering in Overpass.

For example, this query returns over 70 results:

```
[out:json];
area[wikidata=Q30]->.parent;
relation[admin_level=4](area.parent);
out tags;        
 ```

Included are the US territories, the District of Columbia, three Canadian provinces where the US and Canada have a border dispute, several farm management areas, etc.

This query slightly improves the situation:

```
[out:json];
area[wikidata=Q30]->.parent;
// Add boundary=administrative
relation[boundary=administrative][admin_level=4](area.parent);
out tags;
```

But it still returns 59 results, including the US territories, the three Canadian provinces, and DC.

However this query:
```
[out:json];
area[wikidata=Q30]->.parent;
// Add border_type=state
relation[boundary=administrative][border_type=state][admin_level=4](area.parent);
out tags;
```

Returns the 50 states.

All border_type=state are admin_level=4, but not all admin_level=4 are border_type=state.
Tatti Barletta (2024-12-24 08:24:13+00:00): I see you also changed the wiki. Can you add the forum link where this was discussed for the sake of completeness?
Loren Maxwell (2024-12-24 10:33:33+00:00): Well, it's true I made *a* change to that wiki page, but I did not make *that* change.

border_type=state has been there since the 2009 version by Skippern:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Key:border_type&oldid=323226

In 2017 it was cleaned up to the current format by stevea:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Key:border_type&oldid=1490725

You might be able to contact either of them to find out why they did that -- I know stevea is still very active on OSM US and he's pretty approachable.

I tagged them border_type=state for 1) consistency since 14 of the states had it, 36 did not, 2) I use it in the way I described in my other response, 3) and in this post we discussed adding border_type=* to boundaries in the US: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/proposed-double-entry-of-consolidated-city-counties/122459

Perhaps this upset your use of the data in some way?  What was your work around for the 14 states that had border_type=state?
BubbaJuice (2024-12-22 23:10:33+00:00): Also bing streetview
soliMM (2025-01-12 10:23:10+00:00): Reverted in changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161266307
Udarian (2024-12-23 09:29:14+00:00): This park is already mapped so this seems to be a duplicate.
Next time please provide a better change set comment, for more info see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Udarian (2024-12-23 09:40:10+00:00): also a note based on some of your previous commits, we cannot use google as a source for OSM commits and you have placed "#Google" in the hashtags of previous commits so I feel its warranted to point this out.
Udarian (2024-12-28 06:21:19+00:00): please respond
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-12-31 12:28:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 160830549 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some apparently nonsensical changes by related accounts.  No replies to changeset discussion comments
woodpeck_repair (2024-12-29 09:48:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 160742400 where the changeset comment is: revert unexplained building deletion/adding of zoning data in Colombia, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17016
NorthCrab_upload (2024-12-23 00:00:47+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12442488853

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:18:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
TrickyFoxy (2024-12-27 15:36:28+00:00): Что это за треугольники?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1344904186
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1344904185

И что за работа по гис?
TrickyFoxy (2024-12-27 19:55:29+00:00): И я так понимаю эта правка связана с этой https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160519561
TrickyFoxy (2024-12-27 19:57:47+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160690643
Bexhill-OSM (2024-12-23 00:52:48+00:00): Thanks!  If you know any other postcodes feel free to add them :)
TrickyFoxy (2024-12-27 19:56:45+00:00): Reverted. Для тестов используйте https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160690609
woodpeck_repair (2024-12-29 09:48:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 160742400 where the changeset comment is: revert unexplained building deletion/adding of zoning data in Colombia, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17016
ottwiz (2024-12-23 00:52:50+00:00): *Greenbrier County
woodpeck_repair (2024-12-29 09:48:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 160742400 where the changeset comment is: revert unexplained building deletion/adding of zoning data in Colombia, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17016
fortera_au (2024-12-23 02:28:01+00:00): Hi, this blocks right hand turns from the eastern side of Torrens Road to South Road, has something changed recently where this isn't allowed?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160519985
Byenn3636 (2024-12-23 06:02:28+00:00): Line markings suggested thats not permitted when I intended that today, but perhaps I missed some kind of sign? I'm not ultra familiar with the area so I probably should have requested review.
fortera_au (2024-12-23 09:20:32+00:00): You definitely can turn right there, the bridge is represented as two ways in OSM, one for each direction. I'll remove the restriction since you definitely can turn there in that case.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160519985
fortera_au (2024-12-23 09:21:08+00:00): Reverting changeset to remove mistakenly added restriction

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160529458
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-08 04:29:53+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164659769
Joseph R P (2024-12-23 01:25:23+00:00): Thank you for these edits! I was just editing around Stafford County earlier today and noticed how intrusive it was to add other point features (like neighborhood nodes) when addresses were separate from their respective buildings.
AriannaL (2024-12-23 22:49:44+00:00): You're welcome! Almost all addresses in Stafford County are now merged with their respective buildings (if one exists), thanks to VGIN and Esri OpenData. :) Glad to hear the updates are helpful!
suchAnight (2025-01-07 00:51:33+00:00): Hey carlosassuncao92, I noticed that you changed some “route=ferry” tags to “route=boat” for example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/227850799. The ferry tag policy on the OSM wiki states that tag is designated for any route of a public ferry or water bus (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route=ferry). The route mentioned above has an official schedule (https://horarioscitymais.com.br/linha-0039-10-terminal-ferry-boat-santa-cruz-dos-navegantes/) indicating this is a form of public transportation and not a private boating route.

Additionally, there are regular ferry routes nearby (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/48452393) tagged as route=ferry. These routes share similar characteristics suggesting that they are both publicly accessible ferry routes. Do you have any objection to changing these back to route=ferry to better reflect the usage of these routes? Thanks for your input.
Best Regards,
suchAnight

tradução automática

Olá carlosassuncao92, notei que você mudou algumas tags “route=ferry” para “route=boat”, por exemplo: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/227850799. A política de tags de balsa no wiki do OSM afirma que a tag é designada para qualquer rota de balsa pública ou ônibus aquático (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route=ferry). A rota mencionada acima tem um cronograma oficial (https://horarioscitymais.com.br/linha-0039-10-terminal-ferry-boat-santa-cruz-dos-navegantes/) indicando que esta é uma forma de transporte público e não uma rota de barco particular.

Além disso, há rotas regulares de balsa nas proximidades (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/48452393) marcadas como route=ferry. Essas rotas compartilham características semelhantes, sugerindo que ambas são rotas de balsa acessíveis ao público. Você tem alguma objeção em mudar isso de volta para route=ferry para refletir melhor o uso dessas rotas? Obrigado pela sua contribuição.
Atenciosamente,
suchAnight
Fizzie-DWG (2025-01-27 02:38:26+00:00): DWG revert - Google Maps used as Source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161801916
iandees (2024-12-23 03:35:07+00:00): Can you please undo the change to you made to Davanni's here? The branch name is not the slogan for the store.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160520613
Dion Dock (2024-12-23 05:57:21+00:00): I think I got the change got backed out; it was the "tag fix" from iD.
iandees (2024-12-23 13:48:56+00:00): Oh weird, I'll have to check on what iD is doing there.
Patrick1977Bln (2026-04-04 12:34:53+00:00): El operador de las estaciones y de las instalaciones ferroviarias es Adif, no Renfe. (operator=Adif)
Violaine_Do (2025-01-06 21:05:25+00:00): Iaorana et merci pour tes nombreuses contributions! Attention lorsque tu déplaces les batiment à bien ajuster l'imgerie avant. Les batis originellement ont une précision très bonne et devraient être conservés tel quel (données du Pays). Egalement, il serait préférable que tu groupes tes éditions, plutôt que de sauvegarder à chaque modification. N'hésite pas si tu as des questions.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160520778
Violaine_Do (2025-01-06 21:05:33+00:00): Iaorana et merci pour tes nombreuses contributions! Attention lorsque tu déplaces les batiment à bien ajuster l'imgerie avant. Les batis originellement ont une précision très bonne et devraient être conservés tel quel (données du Pays). Egalement, il serait préférable que tu groupes tes éditions, plutôt que de sauvegarder à chaque modification. N'hésite pas si tu as des questions.
CurlingMan13 (2024-12-26 00:38:49+00:00): Good edit
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160520801