piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mga_geo (2024-02-05 14:08:54+00:00): Bonjour,
Malheureusement le GTFS disponible en opendata ( https://data.paysdelaloire.fr/api/explore/v2.1/catalog/datasets/arrets-aleop-loire-atlantique-44-copy/alternative_exports/gtfs_lila_zip/ ) n'est pas à jour.

Sur les cars, la graphie utilisée est "Aleop" et sur le site il y a les deux graphies "Aleop" et "Aléop", une idée ?
kropcheck (2024-02-05 16:08:48+00:00): Le terme officiel est "Aléop", la prononciation le confirme aussi.
perusluku (2024-02-05 11:34:54+00:00): Terve,

En tiedä onko vanhojen ratalinjojen poistaminen tarpeen, sitä dataa kumminkin käyttää esimerkiksi OpenRailwayMap ja muutenkin ihan kiinnostavaa historiatietoa. Eikä siitä liene haittaakaan. Voisiko poiston palauttaa?
dremdau (2024-02-05 12:04:57+00:00): Käsittääkseni historialliset kohteet voi jättää karttaan ainoastaan jos niistä on merkkejä maastossa. Muuten ne kuuluisivat OpenHistoricalMapiin.
perusluku (2024-02-05 12:22:19+00:00): Ihan hyvä tarkennus! En ole varma ollaanko yhteisössä ihan näin jyrkkää mieltä, kun kyseessä on vanhan linjan uusiokäyttö, suopealla tulkinnalla linjan voisi havaita maastossa vanhoja rakenteita. Mutta kumpikin ratkaisu sopii
Tierumpu (2024-02-05 15:20:53+00:00): En ole varma, pystyykö niitä palauttamaan. Toisaalta en tiedä kannattaako niitä palauttaa, koska maastostahan ne on purettu, eikä niitä ole enää olemassa.
perusluku (2024-02-05 15:53:15+00:00): Helsingin alueella on kuitenkin useita vanhoja ratalinjoja tagattuna, eikä niiden poistoa ole ennen tehty. Availen tästä keskustelun foorumin puolelle, niin ehkä jonkinlaista linjavetoa tulee laajemminkin
Arista (2024-02-05 19:12:02+00:00): Malmin hautausmaalle johtanut rata näkyy vielä OSMissa:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=17/60.25328/25.02504
NorthCrab_upload (2024-02-04 20:50:17+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Podana kombinacja addr:city + addr:place jest nieprawidłowa. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, usuń addr:place i zastosuj kombinację addr:city + addr:street. Jeśli nie, pozostaw tylko addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11585172173

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
flohoff (2024-02-05 09:26:25+00:00): Moin,
die änderung hat zu routingänderung geführt bei denen ich mir nicht sicher bin ob die gut sind.

Hier ein Beispiel - Rot alt - Grün neu:

https://osm.zz.de/routeqa/?rid=711564,712801

Ist die Wember Straße wirklich für Durchgangsverkehr gedacht?

Hier die Gesamtmail:

https://gt.owl.de/pipermail/osm-owl-routeqa/2024-February/092697.html

Flo
dopfen (2024-02-05 18:45:39+00:00): Guten Abend Flo, 
vielen Dank für den Hinweis. Ich hatte nicht die Absicht, das Routing derart zu beeinflussen.

Allerdings wüsste ich auch nicht, was für die eine Route oder gegen die andere Route sprechen würde - wobei ich hier nicht im Thema bin, welche Detailinformationen es dabei wirklich zu beachten gibt.

Mich würde interessieren, welche Faktoren da einen Einfluss haben, da ich hierbei ja lediglich die Geschwindigkeitsbegrenzungen nachpflegen wollte, die ich abgefahren bin. Was hätte ich in dieser Situation anders machen sollen?

Erübrigt sich das denn eventuell, je mehr Informationen nachgepflegt werden und somit das Routing genauer kalkulierbar wird? Ist die eine Router vielleicht wirklich besser als die andere?

Ich freue mich, Neues zu lernen und bin dankbar für jede Hilfe.

Gruß
dopfen
VictorIE (2024-12-18 17:07:35+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11585182321

You have power=yes. Does this refer to the cabinet in the wall of Paris Texas? That's a gas connection.
danieldegroot2 (2024-12-19 23:29:01+00:00): Added in
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160413994
NorthCrab_upload (2024-02-04 21:00:17+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, zamień addr:place na addr:city. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/396661201

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Syl (2024-02-17 10:01:35+00:00): J'ai annulé ce groupe de modifications, voir https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/ajouter-le-trace-de-communes-disparues/21113
NorthCrab_upload (2024-02-04 21:10:26+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, zamień addr:place na addr:city. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3386746699

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Geo-Tobi (2024-12-29 22:46:51+00:00): Hi, irgendwas ist da nicht ganz rund: es wurde maxspeed 30 hinzugefügt, aber maxspeed:type verblieb auf DE:urban. Das passt nicht zusammen. Könntest du das korrigieren?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/212739328
dafelix (2024-12-30 11:33:55+00:00): Hi, danke für die Info. Hab es dort und in den benachbarten Wegen korrigiert.
Glassman (2024-02-06 17:06:33+00:00): We typically don't added address info to roads. Instead just add a address node at the entrance to the house or building. Or if the building exists, add it to the building. Can you fix this one?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147069786
ActionJackson$ (2024-02-06 17:39:27+00:00): Okay, that makes sense. Will do in the future... learning curve ;/
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147069786
cyton (2024-04-07 04:53:07+00:00): glaub du hattest den kardiologen hier dupliziert.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149677865
hab das kombiniert und einen gelöscht
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-07-29 09:44:57+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11585180653/history has fixme:type = bridge that was added in this edit
Is it an attempt to map a bridge not present in OSM data? Then https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dbridge has info how to do it properly
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-07-29 09:45:50+00:00): also, bridge is mapped closed to it - is it still needed?
joey_geoloog (2024-02-28 17:50:11+00:00): place tags in islands removed in later changeset
Glassman (2024-02-06 17:09:54+00:00): Again, add the address to the building not the road.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147070339
ActionJackson$ (2024-02-06 17:25:51+00:00): I apologize, I'm new to this format and there is no house... yet, my new neighbor is in the process of building.
Glassman (2024-02-06 17:47:15+00:00): No problem. I've added large numbers of addresses with no buildings even planned. But someday they may be.

BTW - modern routers do well with some spatial gaps, like the end of a driveway and the space to the address node or house.
Fares Deghamna (2024-02-04 23:09:36+00:00): merci
Glassman (2024-02-06 17:09:14+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.

#TIP: add the street, city and zip to the node. Then you don't need the note tag.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147070575
Ewen Hill (2024-02-05 11:14:36+00:00): Hi GameTake YT, re your review request... these edits are great and thanks for doing this. The only thing is the changeset comment of "Added Stuff" doesn't help people know what you have done. Otherwise keep editing.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147070629
Glassman (2024-02-06 17:07:58+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147070694
Glassman (2024-02-06 17:07:00+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147070739
Syl (2024-02-17 10:01:30+00:00): J'ai annulé ce groupe de modifications, voir https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/ajouter-le-trace-de-communes-disparues/21113
emersonveenstra (2024-02-05 14:34:58+00:00): Looks great, thanks for adding those!
NorthCrab_upload (2024-02-04 22:30:16+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8985956769

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2024-02-04 22:30:16+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, zamień addr:place na addr:city. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3386746699
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/396142332

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
bora can (2024-02-04 22:27:04+00:00): *Bayrampaşa
YomanNH (2024-02-07 23:03:03+00:00): Cześć,
nazwa osiedla nie powinna być w addr:street, tylko w addr:place.
The Polish (2024-02-08 09:04:59+00:00): Poprawione
YomanNH (2024-02-08 11:22:44+00:00): Dzięki! :)
skquinn (2024-02-05 01:16:23+00:00): No idea why the changeset comment was empty. Every Door bug?
Average Bloke (2024-02-04 22:59:19+00:00): Closed on mondays.
mcliquid (2024-02-05 07:43:45+00:00): Hi,

please note: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
woodpeck (2024-02-04 23:55:07+00:00): Hallo Christoph Lotz, die Verwendung von "postal_code" an Straßen ist unüblich und unnötig, denn man kann bereits anhand der PLZ-Polygone feststellen, wie die PLZ zu einer Straße ist! Ausserdem hast Du dieses Changeset versehentlich mit "addr:country corrected" tituliert. Übrigens, auch addr:country ist eigentlich überflüssig; die Arbeit, eventuelle Fehlschreibungen zu korrigieren, würde ich mir an Deiner Stelle sparen.
Chieftl (2024-05-17 06:50:57+00:00): на Привокзальній немає розділювального огородження посередині дороги (barrier=guard_rail) і ніколи не було.
Також існує поворот з Грюнвальдської наліво на Привокзальну.
Xvtn (2024-02-05 23:40:55+00:00): Hi! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes here. Everything looks good, except for the problem that a feature already existed here for Tacos Chalitos. In most cases including this one, duplication is no good. Perhaps there was an issue with the map you were looking at? Can you give more info on which map you used? (osm.org, a smartphone app, etc.)
I went ahead and merged that duplicated data.
Syl (2024-02-17 10:01:25+00:00): J'ai annulé ce groupe de modifications, voir https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/ajouter-le-trace-de-communes-disparues/21113
PeterCooperJr (2026-02-28 22:28:06+00:00): Hi! This changeset changed https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/9130493 from "maxspeed=30 mph" to "maxspeed=3025 mph", which I'm assuming is some sort of typo? Seems like it'd be hard to get up to that speed on that little stretch of road. 😉
bxl-forever (2024-02-05 12:22:30+00:00): Hello,
Do you still remember whether this charging station was on the left or right side of the road?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11585729482
I am asking because the node has been drawn in the middle of the road and I cannot determine in what direction to move it.
Thanks.
Wookey (2024-02-05 16:40:20+00:00): Vespucci loves to snap things unhelpfully. The charging space is visible in the satellite pics so I've moved it to the correct side of the road and improved the tagging of all the stations I added. It looks like there are a lot of chargers in back-streets that are not yet on the map.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2024-02-05 02:11:19+00:00): não desenhe vias sobre quadras de futebol para ficar bonito no mapa, não esta certo e foi eliminado.
TrickyFoxy (2024-02-06 08:58:54+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147125447
alexwohlbruck (2024-02-05 03:24:34+00:00): how did you get 24 imagery ?
psychedoot (2024-02-05 03:39:55+00:00): I was looking for '24 aerial imagery, but I couldn't find it in Polaris3g. Apparently MeckGIS has a new tool called Time Machine.

https://timemachine.mcmap.org/#35.24233217841111/-80.81170544028284/20/1705939585000

You can use the dev tools menu to see the tile api calls. Also see the "imagery_used" tag in this commit.
alexwohlbruck (2024-02-05 04:08:35+00:00): ahhh sick, way to go man. got some work to do!
MxxCon (2024-02-09 06:29:33+00:00): Stairs with surface of fine_gravel? Is that accurate?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147075827
IraGersh (2024-02-09 12:32:35+00:00): There are weird stairs. The risers are concrete but in between the risers is probably 4 ft path of fine gravel. It's not steep. Should I put this in the description or a note or both?
IraGersh (2024-02-10 02:02:41+00:00): I modified the stairs feature.
moje_konto (2024-02-05 10:11:22+00:00): www.openstreetmap.org/way/534095733

Nazwę już dodałeś na budynku.

Przy dużych terenach może być sens oznaczać cały teren samą nazwą firmy, a znacznik biura jako punkt w miejscu biura.

Ale tutaj to bardzo mały pojedynczy budynek w całości będący sklepem więc lepiej oznaczyć pojedynczo na budynku.

Zamiast usuwać shop=vacant powinno się je zaktualizować na shop=convenience.

Więc najlepiej przenieść znaczniki z tego nowego węzła/punktu na budynek, by nie dublować nazwy.
moje_konto (2024-02-05 10:26:13+00:00): Przeniosłem na budynek i poprawiłem format godzin otwarcia, dni powinny być skrótami angielskimi.
MichS (2024-02-05 08:43:00+00:00): Gebäudename mit Eigenschaft verwechselt. Mapper reagiert nicht auf CS Nachrichten
hans-juergen koesters (2024-12-22 11:57:31+00:00): werde mich an die Regeln halten!!!
emersonveenstra (2024-02-06 12:46:16+00:00): Hi there,

This changeset broke https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9436140 in three different places: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11586027018
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11586028023
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11586027664

Could you please fix this when you have a chance? Thanks!
ElliottPlack (2024-02-07 20:26:45+00:00): uh oh, sure I'll fix them. Odd that it passed all the josm checks that usually look at affected relations.
ElliottPlack (2024-02-07 20:40:23+00:00): Should be fixed, please review. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147192245
emersonveenstra (2024-02-09 14:19:03+00:00): Looks good, thanks!
ikopanjirukmana (2024-02-12 01:54:36+00:00): Hallo gibranhalil, 

saya ingin menginfokan kalau tag "local code" tidak ada di OSM, yang paling mendakati adalah tag "local_ref". jika memungkinkan bisa diganti dengan tag tersebut

referensi: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:local_ref
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147077747
arjunaraoc (2024-03-05 10:42:39+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147078440
arjunaraoc (2024-03-05 10:43:48+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
Reverted by others
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147078491
pitscheplatsch (2024-02-06 11:16:03+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

Just a test or what's the source of your mapping? Thanks.
arjunaraoc (2024-03-05 10:44:22+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147078631
arjunaraoc (2024-03-05 10:46:01+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).

Reverted by others
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147078636
arjunaraoc (2024-03-05 10:47:24+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
Reverted by others
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147078700
arjunaraoc (2024-03-05 10:48:40+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).

Cleaned up already
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147078742
arjunaraoc (2024-03-05 10:51:26+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148244648
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147078749
pitscheplatsch (2024-02-06 11:04:40+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147086447
arjunaraoc (2024-02-21 05:23:19+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). issue resolved through later edits
MxxCon (2024-02-16 04:24:40+00:00): Since in US there’s no official regulatory body managing hotel star ratings and each hotel can rate themselves however many stars they want, it serves no purpose other than promotional/advertisement for the hotels.

As such, the use of stars=* tag for hotels should be deprecated.
Sajeevini sivajothy (2024-05-22 05:46:44+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. But remember to include a clear changeset comment, for example: "Added points, Place Name, District Names, Country Name, and Suitable Hashtag#OMGuru
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147080329
Sajeevini sivajothy (2024-06-23 06:49:41+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work, and it looks good.#OMGuru#OSMCha
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147080329
szjozsef (2024-07-05 09:55:57+00:00): Hello, why you marked this beacon as disused ?
This is a new airport and that device was installed right before the airport was opened about 1 year ago
geozeisig (2024-07-06 05:21:29+00:00): Hello,
I can no longer say why, but I have reversed the dataset. Feel free to correct this.
DaveF (2024-02-06 15:02:46+00:00): Hi 
What rule in Osmose informed you to remove area tags from platforms?
rskedgell (2024-02-06 15:46:44+00:00): Thanks for spotting and correcting this. Removing area=yes was clearly wrong for railway=platform, since the wiki explicitly states that it's required.

It took a while to find another station where this arose and it appears that the JOSM unnecessary tag rule incorrectly flags area=yes in combination with indoor=*

Ticket logged as:
https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/23463#ticket
Udarian (2024-02-05 12:15:59+00:00): Please revert, see previous commit by your team with the exact same changes https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142847824
Essentially these are pedestrian areas and highway=pedestrian is required for that.
Geo_Cop (2024-02-07 04:41:04+00:00): Hi Udarian,
Thanks for reaching out. My understanding from the OSM Wiki page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:area:highway_pedestrian is that area:highway=pedestrian is the area representation of highway=pedestrian. Which is why it was removed and area:highway=pedestrian was retained.
Based on the wiki, I am inclined to update the tags on the existing footpath to highway=pedestrian rather than a complete revert. Let me know what you think.
Happy Mapping.
Udarian (2024-02-08 13:31:43+00:00): Sorry it took me a day to get back to you,
I think highway=pedestrian is better tagging since these features represent the areas of sidewalks so they are pedestrian areas and if one were to add a new one in iD (or any other editor using the iD tagging schema) would add a new pedestrian area using  the tags of area=yes and highway=pedestrian so that tag should stay. That’s why I didn’t change/remove the area:highway=pedestrian since the area*=* is technically correct so that’s why I feel it would be optimal to keep the tagging before this change.
Happy mapping
Brentar (2024-02-13 12:05:48+00:00): Thank you for feedback given! I’ll review it and come back with any thoughts to conclude on approach.
OSM_RogerWilco (2024-02-05 07:43:31+00:00): Bremen ist ganz schön groß geworden. ;-)
bielebog (2024-02-06 07:22:06+00:00): Die Bäume in Hannover waren noch in der Daten-Ebene und wurden versehentlich angefasst. Trotz Rückänderung der Attribute vor dem Upload blieb's wohl beim Status 'geändert'. Hence the bbox ;)
Udarian (2024-02-05 12:16:09+00:00): Please revert, see previous commit by your team with the exact same changes https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142847824
Essentially these are pedestrian areas and highway=pedestrian is required for that.
Geo_Cop (2024-02-07 04:40:38+00:00): Hi Udarian,
Thanks for reaching out. My understanding from the OSM Wiki page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:area:highway_pedestrian is that area:highway=pedestrian is the area representation of highway=pedestrian. Which is why it was removed and area:highway=pedestrian was retained.
Based on the wiki, I am inclined to update the tags on the existing footpath to highway=pedestrian rather than a complete revert. Let me know what you think.
Happy Mapping,
Udarian (2024-02-08 13:31:33+00:00): Sorry it took me a day to get back to you,
I think highway=pedestrian is better tagging since these features represent the areas of sidewalks so they are pedestrian areas and if one were to add a new one in iD (or any other editor using the iD tagging schema) would add a new pedestrian area using  the tags of area=yes and highway=pedestrian so that tag should stay. That’s why I didn’t change/remove the area:highway=pedestrian since the area*=* is technically correct so that’s why I feel it would be optimal to keep the tagging before this change.
Happy mapping
Brentar (2024-02-13 12:06:11+00:00): Thank you for feedback given! I’ll review it and come back with any thoughts to conclude on approach.