piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
bxl-forever (2024-03-07 18:32:46+00:00): LivoVabo is the name of the company (see https://livo.be/contact: they write LivoVabo nv) while Livo is the public name they use to the public.  Anyway, it is strange that you are commenting on this changeset by Rik007 whereas the name was added… 13 years ago by someone else.  (Rik007’s minor spelling correction looks okay.)

@VDL549: I saw you reverted the name 3 minutes after writing this message, without letting the other mapper reply to you.  If you want to change it, fine, but at least make sure not to just touch the name, otherwise the map just knows about "a building named Livo".  Instead, add relevant tags to really improve the map.  You did some research and found their website: may I suggest that, instead of commenting on random changesets, you do that: add relevant tags such as office=company and contact:website.
Rik007 (2024-03-08 01:34:03+00:00): The firmname is LivoVabo:
https://www.google.com/maps/@50.9966895,4.0353367,3a,61.1y,137.02h,92.43t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1shN3XKYvLXwiLtQDMMlEeIQ!2e0!7i16384!8i8192?authuser=0&entry=ttu
VLD549 (2024-03-14 11:58:13+00:00): Thank you for your response and the explanation, I appreciate it.
However, adding relevant tags, is not something I am familiar with. I am not a mapper.
Thanks again.
BudgieInWA (2024-01-21 10:55:17+00:00): With the Cleopatra Hotel, the change that I made was to create two features: one for the building itself and one for the amenity that is currently set up inside. This distinction is understood in OSM, see the second paragraph of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building.

The *building* is heritage listed feature (described by the linked wikidata entry) and has the name "Cleopatra Hotel".
The *community center* inside the building has the same address, but a different name.

Often we use the same OSM area element to tag both a building and the amenity inside it. This is a shortcut that not applicable here, because the building and amenity have different names, wikidata ID's etc.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146467939
Enock4seth (2024-01-20 22:49:32+00:00): Can you check the position of this node again?
Enock4seth (2024-01-21 15:12:18+00:00): Kindly ignore this comment, the node position looks perfect. 

Also Esri World Imagery is newer than Bing imagery at this time and has the building.
julcnx (2024-04-26 04:55:48+00:00): Hi Enjennies, could you please help me understand the purpose behind your edits where you only split ways? Splitting ways resets their versions to 1, which can make it challenging to track changes, especially when no additional information is added. Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146468063
Robin Bourgeon (2024-02-10 06:36:20+00:00): Le contournement Est de Roissy est bien numéroté A104 tandis que la partie au niveau de Villepinte est maintenant A170. Pourquoi être revenu en arrière sur ces points ?
didier2020 (2024-02-11 14:13:09+00:00): Cela aurait etre comme cela sauf que les gestionnaires du projet ont oublié que le classement de la N2 en A104 nécessite entre autre une enquete d'utilité publique .  Pendant plusieurs années, 
le CER sera nommé N104 dans le 95, N1104 dans le 77. A104 entre A3 et N2 ne changera pas de référence.
didier2020 (2024-02-11 14:17:07+00:00): arrete pour le CER :
https://www.sytadin.fr/trafic/arrete/AIP-DRIEAT-2023-DDT-SEMCV-436-TX.pdf
Robin Bourgeon (2025-01-05 00:08:35+00:00): Savez-vous si finalement le contournement est de Roissy va être appelé A104 ? Ou bien il est voué à rester N104/N1104 définitivement ?
didier2020 (2025-01-07 08:23:12+00:00): Rien de nouveau ... je ne sais meme pas si les services concernés ont commencé le dossier
Britzz (2025-12-30 16:27:44+00:00): Il y a une note (https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4745690) qui demande à appliquer A104 et A170. Par ailleurs https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autoroute_A104_(France)#Autoroute_A170 indique que le renommage a eu lieu... Qu'en savez-vous au final ?
didier2020 (2025-12-31 09:09:38+00:00): Bonjour, l'arreté de circulation n'a pas encore été établi, la signalisation directionnelle avec les indications des nouveaux nom est masquée (a erreur près).
C'est "a prioris" prévu pour cet année (printemps ?). L'arrêté sera mis en ligne sur sytadin.fr des qu'il sera disponible.
didier2020 (2025-12-31 09:10:59+00:00): C'est "a prioris" prévu pour 2026 (printemps ?)
didier2020 (2026-01-03 09:38:08+00:00): L'enquete publique a lieu en janvier :

https://www.seine-et-marne.gouv.fr/contenu/telechargement/65031/537275/file/AP%202024%2002%20DCSE%20BPE%20EPU.pdf
felipeeugenio (2024-01-20 16:06:58+00:00): Hello, what is the purpose of this edition, you basically eliminated all the relevant info.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146468581
felipeeugenio (2024-01-20 16:18:46+00:00): reversed
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146468874
felipeeugenio (2024-01-20 16:18:47+00:00): reversed
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146468874
felipeeugenio (2024-01-20 16:18:35+00:00): reversed
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146468881
felipeeugenio (2024-01-20 16:18:27+00:00): reversed
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146468893
felipeeugenio (2024-01-20 16:18:21+00:00): reversed
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146468924
arjunaraoc (2024-01-22 04:07:11+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146469291
arjunaraoc (2024-01-22 04:26:43+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146469291
CurlingMan13 (2024-01-20 08:45:24+00:00): When mapping landcovers, such as fairways and greens, they should not partially overlap. I have gone through and fixed it for this course. I encourage you to review this webpage to avoid common pitfalls: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#:~:text=the%20building%20itself.-,Common%20mapping%20pitfalls,-Adding%20name%3D*
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146469336
paolo del romano (2024-01-20 08:59:20+00:00): inserimento nome Condominio Nicola Del Romano
paolo del romano (2024-01-20 09:00:49+00:00): inserimento nome del Condominio MIC
CurlingMan13 (2024-01-20 20:37:00+00:00): Same comment from previous changesets...

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146469336

When mapping landcovers, such as fairways and greens, they should not partially overlap. I have gone through and fixed it for this course. I encourage you to review this webpage to avoid common pitfalls: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#:~:text=the%20building%20itself.-,Common%20mapping%20pitfalls,-Adding%20name%3D*
paolo del romano (2024-01-20 08:53:39+00:00): inserimento nome del condominio
paolo del romano (2024-01-20 09:04:12+00:00): il nome del condominio è IL PINO
BCNorwich (2024-01-21 08:25:32+00:00): Hi, You duplicated some highways by placing new roads on top of existing roads. If a road needs correcting it's OSM practice to correct the existing road.  I've now removed the duplicates that disrupted routing. I also added the road names.

Regards Bernard.
Tjuro (2024-01-20 10:34:57+00:00): Hallo boxie24storage,

Welkom bij OpenStreetMap, wij waarderen de toevoegingen die gedaan zijn. Wel zijn er een aantal dingen die beter zouden kunnen.

In Nederland hebben wij alle adressen geïmporteerd vanuit het kadaster, poi’s kunnen dan bij getaged worden bij deze bestaande adressen. Mocht een address niet bestaan dan kan er een import aangevraagd worden bij: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/bag-importverzoeken/3394

Het plaatsen van poi’s buiten een gebouw is niet handig zoals:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11422266573

Openingstijden horen met een “;” gesplitst te worden over de dagen. In plaats van een komma. Zie:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening%20hours?uselang=en


Bij OpenStreetMap proberen wij zoveel mogelijk de verschillende informatie te splitsen. Dit is belangrijk zodat het goed geconsumeerd kan worden.

Op dit moment zit er veel verschillende informatie in de naam van de opslag.

De naam hoort de naam te zijn zoals op de gevel, exclusief locatie of andere pre of post informatie. In dit geval zou de correct naam zijn: “BOXIE24”.

De locatie kan dan in de branch= tag gezet worden. Zie:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:branch

Aan gezien BOXIE24 ook een merk is, is het toevoegen van een brand= tag ook een goed idee. Zie: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:brand

Als jullie een wiki pagina hebben dan kan die ook toegevoegd worden met brand:wikidata=. Zie:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:brand:wikidata

Graag hoor ik wat je hiervan vind, en of je hier hulp bij nodig hebt.

Met vriendelijke groet,

Tjuro
Tjuro (2024-01-20 10:43:12+00:00): Translated version:

Hello boxie24storage, 

Welcome to OpenStreetMap, we appreciate the additions that have been made. However, there are a number of things that could be improved.

In the Netherlands we have imported all addresses from the land registry, poi tags can then be added to these existing addresses. If an address does not exist, an import can be requested from: 
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/bag-importverzoeken/3394

Placing POIs outside a building is not convenient such as: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11422266573

Opening hours should be split with a ";" over the days. Instead of a comma. See: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening%20hours?uselang=en

At OpenStreetMap we try to split the different information as much as possible. This is important so that it can be consumed properly. At the moment, there is a lot of different information in the name= of the storage.

The name should be the name as on the façade, excluding location or other pre or post information. 

In this case, the correct name would be: "BOXIE24". 

The location can then be put in the branch= tag. See: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:branch

Since BOXIE24 is also a brand, adding a brand= tag is also a good idea. See: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:brand

If you have a wiki page, it can also be added with brand:wikidata=. See: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:brand:wikidata

I'd love to hear what you think about this, and if you need help with this.

Sincerely, Tjuro
boxie24storage (2024-01-20 11:09:35+00:00): Thank you for your detail comment. I will ask if I need any help in future.
Tjuro (2024-01-20 12:06:34+00:00): Ok, would it be possible for you to apply this feedback to this poi? Then I could check it again and then I would like it if you fixed this to all the pois that you have added.

See:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/boxie24storage/history
boxie24storage (2024-01-22 09:12:56+00:00): Why you have changed my POI locations? You should not change my POI. I added my POI as exactly as Google map places and I invested a lot of time to add those.
boxie24storage (2024-01-22 09:14:30+00:00): Why you have changed my POI locations? You should not change my POI. I added my POI as exactly as Google map places and I invested a lot of time to add those.
Can you return them to exactly how they were listed? 
Are you admin of this website? So disappointing
Tjuro (2024-01-22 11:33:34+00:00): I have changed your locations, because they were incorrect, in Amersfoort you even had a poi in the middle of an intersection.

Each country in OSM has different ways of adding data. We do not add new nodes if there is an address node already present. If there are multiple nodes you pick the highest house number.

Where the pois are in Google does not matter. We are not Google; we have much stricter standards on adding information.

I am not an Admin. I am a volunteer who is concerned about the way that you are adding data.
boxie24storage (2024-01-23 10:03:04+00:00): Look I added my last POI by following your guidelines but yet you changed that also.
As an example (branch= tag), I added my location sub name.
Tjuro (2024-01-23 11:35:29+00:00): Yes that is right, the branch name is supposed to only contain the part that changes in each branch.

Look at it this way: if you want to use one of youre pois you place each tag into a senctence for example:
(shop=storage_rental) You know it is a place to rent storage.
(name=BOXIE24) you know the name of the place.
(branch=Zwolle) Oh it is the BOXIE24 Zwolle
(Brand=BOXIE24) It is a brand with multable branches

Of you copy theese things into other tags you will get duplicates like: "BOXIE24 Zwolle Zwolle" or
"BOXIE24 Zwolle BOXIE24" etc.

That is why it is important to not add unessesery stuff at the end of tags
NieWnen (2024-01-20 09:35:35+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4075405
Patrickov (2024-06-08 05:54:11+00:00): Please don't untag bus stop nodes!
Patrickov (2024-06-08 05:55:00+00:00): Sorry I mean why you make routes and stop areas include empty nodes instead of proper bus stop nodes?
Dawid2849 (2024-01-21 11:47:48+00:00): Zapomniałeś o relacjach :P
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146509422
Poprawiłem i przy okazji dodałem zakazy zawracania
Yunkers (2024-01-21 14:26:19+00:00): Ach, dzięki za poprawkę. Rzeczywiście zapomniałem.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-20 09:50:42+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11533512483

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
literan (2024-01-20 15:28:11+00:00): не надо мусорить на общей карте
Glassman (2024-01-23 18:18:12+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

Not sure why the tag ford=yes was added to the street. I removed it. Also - just adding a website to an apartment bld unit is incomplete. OSM isn't the place to add businesses without a retail or dedicated building.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146471612
Allison P (2024-01-24 16:15:52+00:00): When looking at the website the listed address corresponds to https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3325932341. It already seems to have a different occupant though. https://newcastletraining.com
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-20 10:10:37+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Generała Sikorskiego":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11533516267

"Spacerowa":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11533547869

"Trojedzianka":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11533547892
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11533547893
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11533547900
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11533547914

"Kochanowskiego":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11533547898

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NeisBot (2024-01-20 13:03:54+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM!

Just a test edit?
jcr83 (2024-01-21 20:53:18+00:00): Bonjour,
Il est très rare qu'on puisse mettre access=no sur un chemin. Pouvez-vous expliciter la raison pour laquelle vous l'avez fait ?
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-20 10:30:48+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/986957182

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NeisBot (2024-01-21 13:31:02+00:00): Hello maxlax, thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.

Thanks!

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
eggie (2024-01-20 16:47:31+00:00): Dag Bert  Ik heb even gekeken met OBLIEK van Slagboom&Peeters  Hier staat geen hek. Dat staat voorbij de kruising.
Ik heb het aangepast.
MVG
eggie
Bert3824 (2024-01-20 19:33:48+00:00): Oh ik kon er vandaag helaas echt niet door. Ga morgen nog eens kijken. bedankt voor het meedenken.
eggie (2024-01-20 20:44:28+00:00): Het hek staat voorbij de inrit Havenweg 27
Dit was jouw bijdrage
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=146472955
gr eggie
Vlctm (2024-02-05 19:14:51+00:00): Hej,
czemu usunąłeś nazwę lombardu?
Wiem, że iD wyrzuca błąd ("suspicious generic name"), ale to miejsce naprawdę nazywa się Loombard. Widzę, że "rozwiązałeś" tu jeszcze dwa inne "problemy" z tej kategorii.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-01-20 10:34:44+00:00): this reverts https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146199481
sahilister (2024-01-25 07:59:06+00:00): Hello hochelagan, 
seems you're adding `source:name=terra.in` tag in all PT ways, which seems like spam. Please refrain from using OSM as such.

sahilister
anirudh-ramesh-irasus (2024-01-25 13:31:28+00:00): Sahil, we had a conversation on this with Kashish at the previous OSM mapping party in GK. I'll tell you if you're gonna attend the next one this Sunday.
sahilister (2024-01-25 13:50:16+00:00): Hello hello, I'll be there.

I remember interesting use case you described but usage of source tags here is incorrect, specially in cases where nodes/areas/relations already exist on OSM.

cheers!
sahilister
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-20 10:50:36+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11533583193
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11533583212

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
wa_wheatbelt (2024-01-22 15:49:51+00:00): From my smartphone GPS measurements over a number of days, I am quite certain that Bing imagery for Merredin should be offset 2 metres to the south. But I realised it's too big a job for me to correct such a large portion of the map single-handedly. Map accuracy to 2 metres is still good, so it seems best that I just continue tracing Bing imagery without any offset to avoid creating inconsistencies. Perhaps a mapper with more experience, or better tools in the future, will be able to offset the entire area?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146559341
blacx (2024-01-21 14:24:00+00:00): Et falta el tag amenity.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:healthcare

A baix de tot tens els diferents amenity que s'hi poden posar, suposo que en aquest cast seria o "clinic" si no et poden ingressar o "hospital" si si que t'hi poden ingressar
martinst (2024-01-20 16:37:22+00:00): Ist schon vorhanden:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/301863359
ChehrehBargi (2024-04-26 21:27:03+00:00): The registration you made has ruined other parts of the map
mKwiatek (2025-01-02 21:23:01+00:00): Cześć. Czy te tory na pewno są w odpowiednim miejscu? Z tego co widzę prawidłowy przebieg jest już zmapowany obok. Pozdrawiam
Chris Fleming (2024-01-23 22:37:42+00:00): Hi Welcome to OpenStreetMap; let me know if you have any questions.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-20 11:40:30+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1183748537

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
rskedgell (2024-01-20 17:58:54+00:00): Thanks - I meant to have a look at that last year when I came across it in Capital Ring-related edits.
user_177389 (2024-01-20 14:59:29+00:00): Hi,

should the relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5674809 really be deleted or was this an oversight?

Best regards,
Mario
b-unicycling (2024-01-20 15:14:00+00:00): Oh dear, thanks for reverting; I hadn't noticed.
MxxCon (2024-01-21 07:00:18+00:00): This edit will be reverted in full.
It is INCORRECT to tag the whole building as a business if that business occupies only a section of that building.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146475671
Sujanmanandhar (2024-02-09 09:10:44+00:00): Noted...
Sorry for any inconvenience. Won't happen again.
fortera_au (2024-01-20 12:21:58+00:00): Hi there, phone numbers in OSM need to be in the proper international format, including spacing. More info on this is available at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features#Phone_Numbers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146475918
BCNorwich (2024-01-21 08:01:53+00:00): Hi, You duplicated a highway by mapping a new footpath partly on top of an existing service road.  I've removed the duplicated highway and amended the section of the service road to reflect PRoW status.

Regards Bernard.
IPCARTER (2024-01-21 08:28:38+00:00): Hi Bernard, apologies for the mistake and thanks for fixing.

Regards, Ian
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-20 12:10:21+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/987506272

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Allison P (2024-01-21 08:26:24+00:00): You didn't add a name
Sujanmanandhar (2024-02-09 19:11:51+00:00): Sorry for the inconvenience. The name has been added successfully now. Please Accept My Sincere Apology.
MxxCon (2024-01-21 07:20:53+00:00): This edit will be reverted in full. You merged 2 features that shouldn't be merged.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146477748
Sujanmanandhar (2024-02-09 09:20:16+00:00): Noted. Sorry for any inconvenience made.  Won't happen again.
philippec (2024-01-21 19:31:34+00:00): Heb je geen foto ?
Litrik (2024-01-22 07:26:10+00:00): Ik zal er één van de dagen nog eens passeren voor een foto.
philippec (2024-01-22 11:02:25+00:00): Ik vrees dat eens het standbeeld er terug staat, iemand zal denken dat de AED er niet past.
Xvtn (2024-01-24 16:13:53+00:00): Hi, and thanks for your contribution! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes here. Everything generally looks great, but here are a few comments:
- Since you say crossing is possible even without the bridge, I'd add something like highway=path, informal=yes, sac_scale=demanding_mountain_hiking, etc. Then make a path-creek shared node with ford=yes and depth=something.
- Most of the tags on the demolished bridge could be removed, probably leaving only access=no and demolished:bridge=yes.
- Nice job on the lifecycle prefix! Those can be tricky.

Let me know if you want me to make any of those changes. As the local mapper with in-person observations I'd say you have the final word. Thanks again for your contributions!!
Xvtn (2024-01-24 16:14:37+00:00): To be clear, on my first note, I meant that that should be an alternate, additional way - separate from the bridge.
Consto (2024-01-24 16:33:49+00:00): Hi, thanks for the review and giving me confidence. Feel free to remove all unnecessary tags from the bridge. Will this be an additional changeset? 
I was there after some rain and it was impossible to cross the river with dry feet, but clearly others had crossed. As I don't know the exact locations, I would not add them.