piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 02:34:28+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153353283
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 02:30:39+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153353234
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 02:16:42+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153353108
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 02:55:56+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153353508
user_5359 (2023-09-14 05:21:38+00:00): Welcome to OSM! house number 4810 is located on https://www.osm.org/way/249551550 (other side of the street). This house have the house number 4805
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 02:02:43+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153352953
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 02:14:23+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153353087
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 02:30:40+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153353234
Fizzie-DWG (2025-10-24 03:17:43+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173698104
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 02:02:44+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153352953
Kovoschiz (2023-09-14 09:25:46+00:00): Please don't use `=*_link` when they connect to different classes of roads. Eg Oi King St is not `=primary`.
Patrickov (2023-09-14 23:43:23+00:00): It also breaks KMB 5C, 8 and 8A TST bound routing.  Apparently you forgot that not all bus routes enter from the big roads.
Patrickov (2023-09-15 02:37:19+00:00): Bus routing of KMB 5C, 8 and 8A fixed in changesets 141279561 and 141279641 respectively.
Patrickov (2023-09-15 02:43:34+00:00): Yet you broke KMB 8A again in change 141280400.
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 02:30:41+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153353234
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 01:57:12+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153352901
Fizzie-DWG (2025-10-24 03:17:44+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173698104
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 01:57:13+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153352901
Fizzie-DWG (2025-10-24 03:21:06+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173698149
Frans S (2023-09-16 11:00:25+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
A: E: Inaccurate mapped and / or not squared.
D: Connecting nodes of buildings to other buildings or features like roads and residential areas.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141238208
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 02:30:42+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153353234
Fizzie-DWG (2025-10-24 03:21:07+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173698149
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 02:30:43+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153353234
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 01:57:14+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153352901
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 02:55:57+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153353508
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 02:28:31+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153353218
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 02:28:32+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153353218
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 02:55:58+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153353508
Fizzie-DWG (2025-10-24 03:21:08+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173698149
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 01:57:15+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153352901
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 02:14:24+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153353087
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 02:28:33+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153353218
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 01:57:16+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153352901
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 01:54:22+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153352866
Fizzie-DWG (2025-10-24 03:21:09+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173698149
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 02:14:25+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153353087
Fizzie-DWG (2025-03-14 06:12:47+00:00): Reverted by DWG - use of unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163597022
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 01:54:23+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153352866
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 02:28:34+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153353218
Fizzie-DWG (2025-10-24 03:21:10+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173698149
mueschel (2023-09-20 09:20:13+00:00): Hi,
you introduced 3 new Tags:

traffic_signal:soundondemand	
traffic_signals:sound_on_demand
traffice_signals:soundondemand

There's a tag already used a few times: "traffic_signals:sound:button_operated" 
This should fit your purpose without introducing a new tag.
milosmid (2023-09-20 10:27:12+00:00): Hello, you only need to add one tag of your choice, but in the Czech Republic there is a difference between a traffic light with an audio signal for the blind and a traffic light that does not sound in the basic mode, but only after activation by a special VPN radio, it starts to sound. Therefore, I would be in favor of introducing one of the tags I suggested. Thank you. Dobrý den, stačí přidat dle vašeho výběru jen jeden tag, ale v ČR je rozdíl mezi semaforem se zvukovým signálem pro nevidomé a semaforem, který v základním režimu není zvukový, ale stane se teprve po aktivaci speciální vysílačkou VPN, začne zvukově signalizovat. Proto bych byl pro zavedení jednoho z mnou navržených tagů. Děkuji.
mueschel (2023-09-20 10:32:36+00:00): Thanks for the explanation. In this case i suggest to use
traffic_signals:sound:radio_operated
This would use the same scheme as the existing traffic_signals:sound:button_operated
milosmid (2023-09-20 13:14:43+00:00): Sure, thanks, I'm writing it down and will use it.
It is also important for blind people to know that the pedestrian crossing is divided and that on the island separating the two directions of the road, the sound signaling can be turned off in the direction already passed (?)

Then I would like to suggest Sound Beadon for beacons for the same microwave signal from special VPN radios. These Sound Beadons are placed in the Czech Republic at subway entrances, on various buildings of public interest such as schools, offices...

How to get these tags to be registered by special navigation systems like Walker Guide or Blind Square? Thank you for your help.
mueschel (2023-09-20 13:22:04+00:00): To get other users to recognize and use the tags, they need to know about them. I'd suggest to write a post in the community forum and ask for some feedback. Then the tag should be documented in the Wiki. It's a minor addition without side effects, so there doesn't need to be a full proposal and voting about it.

The application maintainers usually don't monitor OSM closely enough to find the new tag, so your best bet is to contact them directly in their preferred way of reporting issues for new features.
Multi Pass (2023-09-20 23:11:28+00:00): Hi Marielle,

What does the "(S 1)" mean in the name? 

Also, wouldn't the correct name be "Rossiter Bay Beach"?
user_11609320 (2023-09-14 06:10:01+00:00): they pulled the track. the only customer was the pallet yard. they are gone and the city is in the process of converting the rail to a bike trail.
skquinn (2023-09-14 07:01:18+00:00): Hi,

On the small chance this is a legitimately new mapper, welcome to OpenStreetMap. There are some issues with your edit, most of which have since been fixed; for future reference please note the following:

1. There is no point spamming hashtags on a changeset like this.
2. Addresses are not abbreviated on OpenStreetMap
3. opening_hours=* is not a free form text tag, it is intended to be both human- and machine-readable and has a specific syntax. See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/key:opening_hours for details.
4. Phone numbers should be in international format i.e. phone=+1 713-555-5555
LorenzoPesci (2023-09-14 07:47:18+00:00): come ti ho già scritto, un sentiero in un bosco non è una pista ciclabile e non ha un senso unico.
ivanbranco (2023-09-14 09:49:30+00:00): aggiungo anche che il tag per i nomi da biker é mtb:name=Cavatappi 2, non name=Cavatappi 2
f14-tomcat (2023-09-14 18:51:03+00:00): Accetto tutte le modifiche che vorrete fare, resta il fatto che è un trail da mtb da fare solo in discesa....
LorenzoPesci (2023-09-14 21:38:53+00:00): ho corretto i tag secondo https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mountain_biking
literan (2023-10-29 12:18:59+00:00): не мусори
user_5359 (2023-09-14 16:36:56+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I remove your SEO SPAM (mostly foreign keys, also no address).
eggie (2023-09-14 07:49:53+00:00): Oke.. Hier heb ik het pad weer losgemaakt van de landuse industrial.
Linker alttoets inhouden als je tekent. 
Behalve natuurlijk aan het eind waar het wel vastvmoet.
eggie (2023-09-14 07:50:19+00:00): je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=141242882

Even ter Leering ende Vermaeck
mcliquid (2023-09-14 11:02:35+00:00): Dankeschön! Habe auch die anderen Wege dort noch angepasst, das ist mir mit Relatify wohl passiert.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141252053
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141242975
eggie (2023-09-14 07:42:39+00:00): Werner,

Hier ben je op het verkeerde been gezet. Dit is een voormalige bushalte. (buiten gebruik) Die hoort niet op de brug. 
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=141243017

De naam van de brug kun je op het vlak van de brug zetten (man_made=bridge layer=1)

Het kan ook op een deel van het wegdek, maar dat rendert niet
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bridge:name

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-09-14 07:44:22+00:00): reverted by changeset Wijzigingenset #141243831

De (tijdelijk?  ) buiten gebruikzijnde bushalte teruggezet.
eggie (2023-09-14 07:47:41+00:00): De naam van de brug kun je op het vlak van de brug zetten
gr eggie
Tayvick (2023-09-14 08:11:04+00:00): Other source:

Bing Streetside
Langlaeufer (2023-09-14 09:19:04+00:00): Von wan ist den die Quelle für die Info? Auf dem Luftbild von Mai 2022 stehen Autos in Gegenrichtung.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141243453
Langlaeufer (2023-09-14 09:21:11+00:00): Die Einbahnstr. geht nur bis zur Grenzstraße.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141243453
Langlaeufer (2023-09-14 09:21:17+00:00): Radfahrer frei
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141243453
Langlaeufer (2023-09-14 09:21:46+00:00): Dann haben wir das jetzt hoffentlich.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141243453
ADAC Touristische InfoSysteme (2023-09-14 09:24:26+00:00): Vielen Dank für Deine Änderung. Ich hatte die Info von einem Anwohner. Aber ich hätte wohl nochmals das Luftbild hinzuziehen sollen. Vielen Dank
s8evq (2026-03-11 06:12:40+00:00): Hello,

I wanted to verify before I delete: is there any specific reason why you added `note=Hormuzský prieliv` (instead of adding it to name:sk)?
*Martin* (2026-03-11 09:59:29+00:00): Hi. Probably typo. Fixed.
osmuser63783 (2023-11-29 08:11:32+00:00): Hi I saw that you changed the tags on this building to building=apartments and removed the name. I assume this was an error so I changed it back when I updated the map in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144577713
Nawfal85 (2023-09-14 10:02:48+00:00): good job Merna
Merna_mahmoud (2023-09-14 12:13:25+00:00): Thank you.
HellMap (2023-09-14 15:37:50+00:00): Hi!

I think while the locations are still identifyable as a fuel stations, we can keep the nodes there.

But I did change them to disused:amenity=fuel so they don't appear on maps and navigation.
eggie (2023-09-14 08:36:52+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback Lijkt me oke zo

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Helmoet (2023-09-15 08:35:18+00:00): 👍
eggie (2023-09-14 08:40:01+00:00): Helmoet, Voor openingstijden kun je deze 'tool' gebruiken.
Nu klopt het niet..
openingsuren-tool 
 
http://projets.pavie.info/yohours/ 
 
Het resultaat plak je dan in de 'waarde'. 

MVG
eggie
mueschel (2023-09-19 09:43:16+00:00): Hallo,
du hast hier das neue Tag "arrow:symbol" verwendet. Auch wenn es sich hier um route_marker und keine guideposts handelt, würde ich vorschlagen, die dort üblichen Tags zu verwenden. Also entweder "destination:symbol" oder einfach nur "symbol". Alternativ könnte man auch "osmc:symbol" verwenden, allerdings gibt es da bis jetzt kein Bahnhofs-Symbol.
eggie (2023-09-14 09:26:28+00:00): Removed..  Not valid as OSM contribution.
gr eggie
BitcoinStuffStore (2023-09-14 09:57:07+00:00): I would like to be the first person in Meppel who is accepting Bitcoin or Lightning Network as payment.
That's my goal, but I don't understand what I have to do for that. 

Can you help me?
eggie (2023-09-14 10:22:50+00:00): Hi .. In case this is an office with the possibility to visit you may add a contribution to the addressnode (not the buildingshape)

office=..... 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:office
If it's a normal familyhouse not. 
There must be a shield with the name of the office on the outside. 

Greetz,
eggie
pb07 (2023-12-04 14:02:24+00:00): Attention, à plusieurs endroits vous avez voulu signaler un chemin fermé. Mais pour cela, vous avez remplacé le chemin (track ou path ou autre) par une barrière ce qui n'est pas correct.
Il faut laisser le chemin qui existe toujours. S'il y a une barrière, il faut la rajouter là où elle est.
Frans S (2023-09-14 13:00:38+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 
Please don't end a path at a border of a residential area. Just continue and connect it to another road.  (be sure to connect them properly)
Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141247270
Frans S (2023-09-14 13:10:36+00:00): Hello. Another point.
You added a layer to a building.
 Why ? To hide an upcoming error because the path crosses the building ?
Just adjust one of them.
Best regards
Negreheb (2023-12-07 11:13:51+00:00): From what i get from google translate it does not sound like thats the correct name. You are importing a lot of stuff from sources with unclear licencing. 

I will open a thread in the forum and your project should be discussed there. Please stop importing stuff meanwhile.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-12-07 20:37:26+00:00): https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/user-importing-prison-names-from-official-websites-and-sometimes-deleting-valid-stuff-by-mistake/106778 - thread (it is not obvious at all where to search for it)
Negreheb (2023-12-07 21:23:58+00:00): Thanks Mateusz, i commented the link on another CS. Ma fault.
saldenisov (2023-12-08 09:21:05+00:00): http://fkurf.ru/sibirskij_fo/krasnoyarskij_kraj/fku_sizo-1.html

ФКУ Следственный изолятор №1 ГУФСИН России по Красноярскому краю

In Russian, official names are strange. I do know about that. I lived there for 25 years.
Tomas Straupis (2023-09-15 05:42:05+00:00): Savo adresų išradinėti tai nereikia ;-)
Warin61 (2023-09-15 00:13:53+00:00): Part reverted to restore Meryla State Forest boundary.
Larmax (2023-09-14 12:17:48+00:00): Hei, pyri rajaamaan muokkauksesi koskemaan enintään yhtä maata kerrallaan. Tässä muokkaukset yltävät Suomesta Nepaliin, jotka ovat eri maanosissa. Enemmän aiheesta wikissä: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
snoozingnewt (2023-09-17 00:48:32+00:00): Hello,

You changed https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/42409863 to a building. Please be more careful next time.

Thanks,
snoozingnewt
snoozingnewt (2023-09-17 00:50:36+00:00): Checked further and it seems that you weren't the one that changed the tag, my apologies.
eserte (2023-11-18 13:40:15+00:00): Zurzeit ist in der Rollbergstraße eine Einbahnstraßenregelung, offen Richtung Westen.

Bauarbeiten bis Ende März 2026 könnte sein, jedenfalls steht das auf den Halteverbotsschildern.
Fraxi (2023-09-14 09:55:24+00:00): source:https://www.facebook.com/park.vitosha/posts/pfbid02nQvuT2om5SRsks3rwabnsA3d1WhG6s5ahQxskohXSqCFfYyH9j5V78Q7mUWD4ACjl
Jakka (2023-09-15 07:08:37+00:00): wandelpad ten zuiden hangt niet vast aan de hoofdweg.
Jakka (2023-09-15 07:05:28+00:00): garage toegevoegd en codeert als "house" ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1207710960
aTarom (2023-09-14 13:50:01+00:00): Hola GerardJP, gracias por editar y bienvenido a OSM! sabes si este tag está bien escrito?
"payment:wayllet"
en
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11190076679/history
quizás en "payment:wallet"pero no parece estar muy extendido y como desconozco el tema prefiero preguntarte primero
Saludos
aTarom (2023-09-14 13:54:00+00:00): Acabo de encontrar el "payment:app"="Waylet"
te parece bien cambiarlo a este?
GerardJP (2023-09-14 14:02:40+00:00): Si, sería Waylet, se me coló una L de más
GerardJP (2023-09-28 09:14:43+00:00): El punto añadido, cuanto tiempo necesita para aparecer en ABRP? gracias
aTarom (2023-09-28 16:30:38+00:00): Desconozco la frecuencia de actualización de ABRP y que elementos recoge o no de OSM, en la Base de datos OSM cualquier cambio está disponible prácticamente de inmediato, quizás te puedan resolver la duda en el foro de los desarrolladores de ABRP
https://forum.abetterrouteplanner.com
marczoutendijk (2023-11-13 14:22:48+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1207714922
bridge=1?
What is the meaning of that?
martianfreeloader (2023-11-13 15:37:26+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for quality review and flagging this. It has no meaning, it's just a mistake. I've corrected it to bridge=yes.

Happy mapping.
eggie (2023-09-14 10:33:49+00:00): Dag Op t Rad

Over dit pad loopt een officiele ruiterroute.
Die is nu geblokkeerd door access=no

Mogen ruiters hier ook niet meer komen?
Welk bord staat er vooraan?
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-09-14 10:36:09+00:00): Een slecht wegdek wil niet zeggen verboden toegang.
Ik heb access=no verwijderd ivm de ruiterroute.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-09-15 13:02:43+00:00): Oke... dat zal dan nog steeds zo zijn maar access=no houdt ook ruiters tegen.
Dan in dit geval horse=designated toevoegen.

Dan wordt alles gestopt behalve ruiters.
Groet..
eggie
eggie (2023-09-15 13:04:25+00:00): Wanneer het officieel een ruiterpad is met een officieel bord dan highway=bridleway..
eggie (2023-09-15 13:07:50+00:00): Ik heb het nu even aangepast met access=no
horse=designated
Gr eggie
Tomas Straupis (2023-09-15 04:48:54+00:00): Road classification is not influence by the fact if road is closed or not. You add access=no if required.
Jay May (2023-09-15 08:11:29+00:00): Hmmm, I look at that a bit differently: I reason taking in account what function does the road have at the moment. Currently, it has no transit function, so I don't see keeping the old classification as relevant.
Btw, do you know whether the local traffic border checkpoints (vietinio eismo PKP) with Belarus are still open? The info I am finding seems to be outdated
Tomas Straupis (2023-09-15 08:40:49+00:00): These roads have their reference numbers which dictate their official classification (or vice versa depending on how you look at it). OSM road classification in Lithuania is a mapping of official classification. We strive to remove as much subjectivity as possible to avoid constant re-classification.
I'm not aware of a current status of checkpoints. I would be happy if all of them would be closed until the end of the war.
Jay May (2023-09-15 08:51:01+00:00): To be honest, I don't understand why Lithuania and Latvia keep so many border checkpoints opened in the current circumstances... Even Poland has left only 2 border checkpoints opened with Belarus: one for trucks and one for cars/buses.
I must admit am pretty angry at Belarusians for their passivity and conformism... They are against the war, but they do nothing to deter that idiot who invited the agressor to its soil
Tomas Straupis (2023-09-15 09:11:21+00:00): So we have a very similar view on this matter :-)
eggie (2023-09-14 11:04:22+00:00): Dag JPulford
Waarom dan geen leisure=garden op de zuidelijke stukken?
MVG
eggie
JPulford (2023-09-14 11:11:48+00:00): Goed idee, eggie. Bedankt!
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2023-09-22 11:55:57+00:00): Venligst brug standardværdier for farver.

Fx white i stedet for "Hvid".

Se:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:colour
user_5359 (2023-09-14 16:51:09+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I remove your SEO SPAM entry (mostly foreign keys).
user_5359 (2023-09-14 16:39:30+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I remove your SEO SPAM entry (mostly foreign keys).
Frans S (2023-09-17 10:45:56+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
A: E: Inaccurate mapped and / or not squared.
C: Collecting multiple buildings and mapping them as 1 building.
D: Connecting nodes of buildings to other buildings or features like roads and residential areas.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141252298
eggie (2023-09-14 17:07:06+00:00): 
opening_hours		24/7?

I can visit your office anytime? 
In the middle of the night? 
If this is an online office  we don't add this in OSM.
Please answer the questions.
We asked this before but got no reply.
greetz
eggie
eggie (2023-09-14 17:09:52+00:00): Please remove your contribution.
This is an online office.. 
Greetz,
eggie
Taya_S (2023-09-14 18:16:20+00:00): As explained in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137417116 webstores don't belong on the map.

Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141270848