piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
rochirochi (2026-03-27 00:43:02+00:00): En cualquier caso:
1. No afecta al entendimiento del mapa, puesto que no se renderiza en las capas habituales provocando equívocos.
2. Estos datos se utilizan en portales especializados como openrailwaymap.org que extrae datos de openstreetmap para mostrar 
3. Es una práctica extendida en todos los países del mundo, incluyendo España y existiendo casos concretos en la provincia de Málaga. No se está inventando nada.
4. La etiqueta "railway=razed" está diseñada para esto. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Drazed

Este tipo de comportamiento dogmático solo desanima a otros usuarios a emplear su tiempo en añadir información valiosa, que de otro caso sería más difícil de encontrar
dcapillae (2026-03-27 00:52:14+00:00): No es dogmático, solo sigue las normas de edición del proyecto. Tenga en cuenta que «railway=razed» se usa cuando no queda nada de la vía pero el trazado todavía es visible sobre el terreno a través de imágenes aéreas, como dice el wiki. 

Si otro mapeador encuentra un «railway=razed» y es incapaz de ver el trazado en imágenes aéreas, podría eliminar el elemento.

Mi recomendación es que mapee solo aquellos tramos del trazado que sea identificables por imágenes aéreas. Donde se conserve, por ejemplo, el antiguo terraplén de la vía férrea, se podría justificar plenamente su uso.

SI no queda nada, ni vías ni terraplén ni ningún signo sobre el terreno que permita adivinar el antiguo trazado de la vía férrea, mi recomendación es que mapee nada en ese caso.
rochirochi (2026-03-27 00:55:34+00:00): La mayor parte del trazado de las vías de este conjunto se encontraba superpuesta a elementos visibles como calles, caminos y límites de parcelas
dcapillae (2026-03-27 01:05:23+00:00): Exacto. Es algo común que antiguos trazados de trenes desaparecidos. Si se han construido edificios encima o una carretera, no hay forma de identificar el antiguo trazado.

En el casco urbano de Málaga se habrá perdido cualquier vestigio, pero en otras zonas puede que aún se conserven los terraplenes del tren por donde iban las vías, y se podrán identificar con ayuda de imágenes aéreas, por lo que no debería tener problemas con otros mapeadores.

«railway=razed» podría ser una solución en esos casos.
alan_gr (2026-03-27 09:32:53+00:00): Estoy de acuerdo que es un asunto interesante, yo mismo he caminado por la Calle Omán en Churriana siguiendo el trazado histórico del ferrocarril suburbano. 

Creo que valdría la pena investigar más OpenHistoricalMap, cómo una formar más permanente de mapear tus conocimientos de la historia del ferrocarril. Por ejemplo, OHM tiene más posibildades de mapear cambios en el trazado a lo largo de los años, y otras objetos cómo estaciónes desaparecidas. 

La versión más moderna (vectorizada) de OpenRailwayMap, OpenRailwayMap.app, toma sus datos historicos de OHM por defecto, en preferencia a OSM. Aquí por ejemplo, el ferrocarril de Bobadilla a Loja viene de OHM, no OSM:
https://openrailwaymap.app/#view=10.88/37.0909/-4.4412&date=1932

Es verdad que hay muchos ferrocarriles desaparecidos mapeados en OSM. Es una practica desarollado sobre todo cuando OHM no estaba activo, pero creo que ahora hay un movimiento hacía el uso de OHM. 

Hay más información aquí:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenHistoricalMap/Projects/Railways
alan_gr (2026-03-27 09:39:08+00:00): Me olvidé comentar que hay unos buenos ejemplos del mapeo con OHM en Portugal:
https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/#map=9/38.082/-8.528&layers=R&date=1910-05-20
AngocA (2026-06-19 23:02:16+00:00): Hola alxfl, 
Las etiquetas name de las vías en OSM son los números en Colombia. Los nombres oficiales van en otra etiqueta.
LordGarySugar (2026-04-23 19:01:18+00:00): I still don't agree with this - I don't think we achieved a consensus on the forums to map a banking hub with 6 separate amenity=bank nodes.
Robert Whittaker (2026-04-24 06:29:07+00:00): The was no consensus not to either, not even any firm alternative proposal, and I don't see any better way to record the data in a manner the data users will readily be able to interpret. To avoid tagging and interpretation complexities, the individual community bankers really need to be separate objects in OSM, and I think that's consistent with https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element . If you don't want them to be amenity=bank + bank=community banker then please do propose something else. In the meantime time, what I've done here seems a reasonable way to proceed. (The banks themselves typically list their community bankers as 'branches' that you can visit.) The additional bank=* tags (as per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Any_tags_you_like ) future-proof it, so any instances mapped like this can be found and could converted to any new scheme that's agreed at a later date.
Hufkratzer (2026-03-30 20:02:03+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/149327354 does not look like a horse riding center ( leisure=horse_riding ), it looks like a horse riding arena and in this case should be tagged with leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian instead, like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1421657893#map=18/32.975177/-117.028789&layers=P which is an arena belonging to a riding center. See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a#Riding_centre_(equestrian)
Hufkratzer (2026-03-30 20:03:21+00:00): I meant https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1493273548
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-03-26 23:31:47+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 179113585.
maro21 (2026-03-28 17:55:12+00:00): Proszę nie mapować pod walidator. Usunąłęś poprawny adres i ustawiłeś taki jak jest na innym budynku.
Adikso (2026-03-28 22:32:01+00:00): Zanim usuwasz to może podziel się informacją jakie jest twoje żródło istnienia adresu "64 garaż 7"? Geoportal? Jakieś dane autorytatywne? Nie widzę nigdzie żeby istniał budynek o numberze "64 garaż 7" - to nie jest tagowanie zgodne z powszechnie przyjętymi przez społeczność standardami mapowania. OSM to jest baza danych, która ma być używana jak baza danych, a nie do tego żeby mapper sobie kliknął w jOSM na adres i przeczytał zawartość addr:housenumber. Taki housenumber jest bezużyteczny, niemożliwy do przetworzenia i nie będący w interesie projektu. Adres zmieniłem na taki zgodny z rzeczywistością, zgodny z obowiązującymi normami tagowania i możliwy do przetworzenia przez komputery. Zwłaszcza że budynek który znajduje się pod tym POI ma oznaczenie "7" w tagach.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-03-28 23:33:15+00:00): jeśli to jest realnie używany adres to może 
addr:full=64 garaż 7
by było do obrony
rodolfovargas (2026-03-28 00:37:18+00:00): Buenos aportes.
Continua mapeando.
MappingMore (2026-03-29 04:32:34+00:00): Partially Revert of 180480007
marczoutendijk (2026-03-27 19:49:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180519108 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for evading previous block
gurglypipe (2026-03-27 00:36:22+00:00): 🙌
b-jazz (2026-03-31 16:26:22+00:00): RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1493280026, et al

I mentioned this before in a previous change of yours. Please make sure you read and understand changeset comments and engage with others so you understand and don't continue to make mapping errors. Thanks.

When drawing golf course areas (i.e. greens, fairways, bunkers, tees, etc.), please be aware that the ways (lines) used to outline those areas must not cross over each other. Fairway outlines shouldn't cross over greens or bunkers or other fairways for example. Take a look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Golf.png for an example of the "Wrong" way to map a fairway and a green, along with the correct way. There are some cases where a fringe exists around a green and you should draw the fairway outline completely around a green, leaving room for the fringe. Other times, the fairway and green butt up against each other. In that case the fairway and green should share the same nodes at the boundary between the two, and every node at the boundary needs to be shared, leaving no gaps. When drawing these shared nodes, editors like iD (built into openstreetmap.org) will "snap" to an existing node if you get close enough. If you have any questions about golf course mapping, feel free to reach out. Thanks.
ika-chan! (2026-03-27 00:45:24+00:00): Sorry, I meant "and", not "land".
b-holdet (2026-03-30 12:12:05+00:00): @Simonsen30
Hvorfor har du slettet vejen ned til bådebroen? Der er tydeligvis opbevaring af bøde langs vejen, så det er muligt at køre på vejen.
b-holdet (2026-03-30 12:12:34+00:00): ikke "bøde", men "både"
b-holdet (2026-03-30 08:08:00+00:00): @Simonsen30

Du skal ikke slette veje, der er synlige i den reelle verden.
Der er en tydelig vej ind gennem bygningen og den benyttes.
Du må godt sætte adgangsbetingelser på, men ikke slette vejen.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_remove_objects_that_you_don't_need_or_like
b-holdet (2026-04-01 05:56:40+00:00): Jeg har tilbageført din sletning i https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180701341 og sat adgangsbegrænsning på vejstykkerne.
JJIglesias (2026-03-27 04:57:59+00:00): Saludos. En el CPV2024 NO existe ninguna población denominada San Fermin de Mamurani con 171 habitantes. Existe una Población llamada San Fermin de Mamorayani con 171 habitantes que está ubicada en otra posición dentro del mismo municipio Sorata. Esa población esta registrada en esta posición (-15.62332564 -68.49549651) en el CPV2024.

Podrías aclararnos si son la misma población? porque la que agregaste NO hay indicaciones de viviendas o construcciones en ninguna de las imagenes aereas disponibles, tampoco hay NINGUNA via de Comunicacion o acceso, y la UNICA poblacion cercana a lo que pusiste se llama Flor de Lima.

Gracias
arjunaraoc (2026-04-05 12:42:42+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Please check the tags, building can not be residential for what is actually an examination hall.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180481800
Jutzz (2026-03-27 02:36:48+00:00): Or, considering discussion on that tag, highway=path, highway=tertiary or highway=unclassified, but not service as it is used for movement, not access.
arjunaraoc (2026-04-05 12:50:45+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).  There can not be two primary highways so close. Please check your created ways.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180482318
arjunaraoc (2026-04-05 12:53:55+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Name  as Tea & coffee is suspicious. Please update with  the name on the signboard.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180482565
rarad74 (2026-03-27 07:07:52+00:00): Salut si multumim pentru treaba minunata pe care o faci pe aici  si sunt sigur ca mai esti si in timpul muncii. Dar sa nu uiti de ele cand o sa le dea drumul din nou :P
Geovector47 (2026-03-27 03:25:25+00:00): I forgot to list data sources. I used the satellite imagry, street level photos, and local knowledge for this change.
NeisBot (2026-03-27 03:14:21+00:00): Hi jbrandback, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 96% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 21 natural(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180482869
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-27 06:47:10+00:00): Looks ok, user deleted their own data.
silversurfer83 (2026-03-28 17:30:49+00:00): Hi :)

I added the proper lifecycle prefix to the water well. You can do that with OsmAnd, too. No need to use name=* to leave a description.

A question remains, though: Was this really a building=* at some point?

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180482965
felipeeugenio (2026-03-27 12:59:41+00:00): Hola. Ya le hemos indicado anteriormente de consultar el cambio de categoría de las localidades. Ninguna de las que modificó corresponden a un Village.

Por otro lado @jptolosa está revisando si la cantidad de habitantes corresponden.

Además, la fuente de los datos es el INE. el Censo es solo el método.

saludos.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180483078
jptolosa (2026-03-27 13:48:22+00:00): Hola Bustte, al chequear los datos de población con las fuentes que citas son incorrectos ¿Nos puedes explicar cómo los obtuviste?
Saludos.
Hufkratzer (2026-03-30 21:11:36+00:00): Hi,
Here you craated several areas (list below) tagged with leisure=horse_riding that do not look like horse riding centres; they rather look like horse riding arenas that are usually tagged with leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian . I think you usually tag them that way. Why not here? I don't understand what "(blame @watmildon if anything went wrong)" means. Do you mind if I retag these areas? 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1493310422
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1493310495
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1493310511
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1493310725
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1493310769
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1493310775
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1493310841
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/888600391 (v2)
LordGarySugar (2026-03-30 21:40:06+00:00): Hey, this changeset converted lots of redundant multipolygons into simple ways, I didn't add anything new or change any tags in this changeset. It's a plugin being actively developed by watmildon, so it was a reference to the fact it's not quite perfect yet. One issue is that it doesn't always preserve the history, which is why lots of these ways are version 1. Any cleanup of the mapping here as you suggested is welcome, I didn't notice the riding arenas were tagged wrongly here. I have been meaning to do a review of the mapping here but haven't got round to it yet. Hope that's all ok, thanks!
Hufkratzer (2026-04-05 21:11:01+00:00): Thanks for explanation and fixing.
pwbriggs (2026-04-01 20:06:59+00:00): Your changes look good to me. Thanks, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
domi_id (2026-03-28 11:11:08+00:00): 1038 levels in a building? Tottenham Hale putting Burj Khalifa to shame.
JJ_P (2026-03-28 11:29:15+00:00): I fixed this mistake. Thank you for writing to me about her!
eggie (2026-03-27 07:21:04+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Timmy_Tesseract (2026-04-06 08:16:39+00:00): Good afternoon. Could you please have another look at the name tags of Daang Hari Extension/Open Canal Road? Which of the two names is the current official name for the road?

When editing names please make sure to select all affected segments to avoid name alternating forth and back. 

Also if a road has several names then these should be preserved in alt_name/old_name or variants. Right now there are numerous segments that have both name and alt_name set to Open Canal Road while the name Daang Hari Extension was removed by your edits.
Baloo Uriza (2026-03-30 18:00:46+00:00): Generally a good idea to include the street names on sidewalks for the same reason we usually include the street names on all the roadways of a multiple-roadway street.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180485396
TheNatBoi (2026-04-07 04:52:51+00:00): Thanks, I’ll (hopefully) remember that.
TheNatBoi (2026-04-07 05:00:58+00:00): Although now that I’m checking the wiki it shows that naming the sidewalk isn’t well agreed upon, so I don’t think I will do this until there’s a consensus (or if the wiki is out of date).
Baloo Uriza (2026-04-07 13:27:37+00:00): I believe the wiki to be out of date, as there's been several threads over the years pointing out that consumers already use this information, and some users (especially blind pedestrians) find it useful.
TheNatBoi (2026-04-08 23:30:47+00:00): Yeah I figured it was outdated. Good to know.
NeisBot (2026-03-27 05:48:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13684001927 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Plagas control office"
---
Por ejemplo, una versión más neutral y objetiva de tu texto podría ser: "Oficina de control de plagas"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
Magronga (2026-03-27 10:35:57+00:00): Oficina Control de plagas en Sevilla
ljc_jlyb (2026-04-01 17:53:18+00:00): 请使用https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ref:colour
yzuio (2026-04-04 05:23:38+00:00): changed
pesec (2026-03-27 06:58:31+00:00): Здравствуйте.
Вы внесли ошибочные данные. Эта дорога имеет 4 полосы, по 2 в каждую сторону.
NeisAgent (2026-03-27 12:22:43+00:00): 🕵 The changeset tags appear to reference Google as a data source.

Please note that using Google Maps, Google Street View, or similar Google services as a mapping source is not allowed in OpenStreetMap due to license restrictions.

More information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google

If the data in this changeset was derived from Google or another incompatible source, the edits may need to be reverted.

If this is a misunderstanding and the data was collected from permitted sources (e.g. local survey, Bing imagery, local knowledge, etc.), please clarify in a reply.
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-27 12:24:25+00:00): Sorry, das ist ein false positive report.

#HappyMapping
martinst (2026-03-27 13:04:36+00:00): Ich habe aus JOSM die URL für "basemap.at Surface" in den iD Editor eingefügt. Sollte also erlaubt sein.
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-27 13:10:28+00:00): Ja, passt. Wie gesagt, hier ist mir ein Fehler unterlaufen.

Beste Grüße, Pascal
midget sub (2026-04-06 14:37:50+00:00): Hi, it seems you're using a bulk editor to make massive changes at once. However, some of these changes are incorrect (for ex., you have changed some dirt surfaces to asphalt). Please be sure you are basing your edits on actual on-the-ground conditions. Thanks.
VLD0251 (2026-03-28 21:49:44+00:00): Remember to add a comment (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments) and a source (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source) to every changeset, as previously requested.
VLD0251 (2026-03-28 21:48:27+00:00): Remember to add a comment (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments) and a source (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source) to every changeset, as previously requested.
VLD0251 (2026-03-28 21:46:58+00:00): Remember to add a comment (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments) and a source (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source) to every changeset, as previously requested.
VLD0251 (2026-03-28 21:54:47+00:00): Remember to add a comment (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments) and a source (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source) to every changeset, as previously requested.
VLD0251 (2026-03-28 21:43:53+00:00): Remember to add a comment (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments) and a source (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source) to every changeset, as previously requested.
VLD0251 (2026-03-28 22:08:05+00:00): Remember to add a comment (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments) and a source (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source) to every changeset, as previously requested.
VLD0251 (2026-03-28 22:07:08+00:00): Remember to add a comment (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments) and a source (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source) to every changeset, as previously requested.
NeisBot (2026-03-27 06:33:50+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 8 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/685315841 v3 | 5 crossings
https://osm.org/way/426441767 v11 | 3 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/6421925530 v3

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180486641
iandees (2026-03-27 14:55:10+00:00): Hello! I noticed that nodes https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12029834716, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6421925530 were moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180506873, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
VLD0251 (2026-03-28 22:02:52+00:00): Remember to add a comment (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments) and a source (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source) to every changeset, as previously requested.
VLD0251 (2026-03-28 22:05:36+00:00): Remember to add a comment (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments) and a source (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source) to every changeset, as previously requested.
NeisBot (2026-03-27 06:54:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13684005949 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Home maintenance office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-04 10:33:04+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180846868
(Delete spam tags. First version)
NeisBot (2026-03-27 06:54:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13684031350 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Drain service company"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-04-04 10:33:06+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/180523973
eggie (2026-03-27 08:07:56+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community