piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ADAC Kartographie (2024-03-01 10:32:40+00:00): Hallo zusammen, danke für euren Input. Ich habe meine Änderungen wieder rückgängig gemacht und die Bezeichnung Kyjiw unter official_name:de eingetragen (vgl. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148090189).
dieterdreist (2024-03-01 10:35:49+00:00): danke, das ging schnell!
BCNorwich (2024-02-29 08:46:26+00:00): Hi, I've removed the fictional motorway.
MxxCon (2024-02-29 02:55:00+00:00): You must not be good at this whole "SEO" thing if the quality of tags in this edit are any indication of what you would be providing to your customers.🤣
Why don't you put in some effort into learning the proper way to map in OSM?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148006705
eggie (2024-02-28 11:16:23+00:00): Dag Jesper..
Je vraagt feedback.. 
 Lijkt me oke.
Wat er niet meer is kun je gerust verwijderen
Groet
eggie
Eino81 (2024-02-28 12:05:13+00:00): Are you sure? That part is behind those security gates, on each side... Do you tell me, that you can get inside there with a bike?...
canfe (2024-03-01 08:57:39+00:00): Hai cancellato il confine amministrativo di Murello
In altro utente ha provveduto a ripristinare.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148007230
alexey_zakharenkov (2024-02-29 09:53:01+00:00): Теги building:levels и building:levels:underground не имеют смысла без тега building или building:part.
Прочитайте, пожалуйста, вики-статью про здания и исправьте.
TrickyFoxy (2024-03-01 11:59:05+00:00): Что значат ваши комметарии?
eggie (2024-02-28 11:09:06+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback Alle begin is moeilijk. 
Dat drinkwaterpunt is oke, maar je hebt adresnode Bere klauwlaan 6 ergens anders heen verplaatst. Dat komt omdat je schuift met de kaart. Houd het gebied van je edits klein. Beter niet schuiven, want dan verplaats je ongemerkt nodes.
Ik heb het adres hersteld.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=148007370

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-02-28 11:15:16+00:00): Dag FO8O

Je vraagt feedback. Lijkt me oke zo.
MVG
eggie
Filip009 (2024-02-28 22:08:02+00:00): Yes, you have deleted this footway https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/906141960. You can see his position here https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=148007910
Henry572 (2024-02-28 10:51:37+00:00): Und Lagekorrekturen
eggie (2024-02-28 11:19:58+00:00): Wanneer iets aan de gebouwen niet meer klopt kun je dat het beste doorgeven dmv een terugmelding bij het Kadaster anders komt bij een update de oude vorm weer terug.
Een terugmelding kun je hier doen.
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/?searchQuery=zandweg+11-x&objectId=1581200000400662&theme=BRT+Achtergrond&geometry.x=154871.17976382902&geometry.y=446965.91923143406&zoomlevel=15.245974091938143

Doe je dat zelf?

MVG
eggie
T4om (2024-02-28 11:29:23+00:00): Hoi Eggie,

Bedankt voor de informatie.

ik wist niet dat dat ook gekoppeld was.

melden aan het kadaster laat ik even aan de eigenaar van het stuk land.

met vriendelijke groet

tom
hauke-stieler (2024-06-10 19:21:09+00:00): Hi,

leider musste ich an deinen beiden Depot-Änderungen Korrekturen vornehmen. Die Gebäude müssen weiterhin mit "building=yes" getaggt werden, ansonsten zählen sie halt nicht mehr als Gebäude ;) Hier in Stellingen ist auch nicht nur MOIA im Gebäude drin, daher habe ich die Tags am Gebäude entfernt und auch ein eigenes Landuse-Polygon https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/70370769 übertragen. Das markiert jetzt also wirklich genau die Fläche, die als Depot dient. In Horn habe ich auch am landuse-Polygon Korrekturen der Tags vorgenommen.

Schaue bei Änderungen am besten einmal ins Wiki, da steht, wie man Dinge einträgt. Z.B. hier https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:industrial=depot

Viele Grüße
Hauke
gscholz (2024-03-03 07:54:16+00:00): Hi thisishowidoit,
your recent edits have left behind several errors regarding duplicate nodes:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=53.61004&lat=28.56751&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=148008252


Can you please fix this? Please do not ignore the error warnings your editor shows you (see list above).
Kind regards
Guido
Hufkratzer (2024-02-28 18:51:17+00:00): Hi,
All the areas that you have mapped today as riding centres (leisure=horse_riding, 9 so far) are no riding centres but just riding arenas. In OSM riding arenas are usually tagged leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian. See
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dhorse_riding
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a#Riding_centre_(equestrian)
I only recently drew your attention to this in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146932062 . Why do you still misuse the horse_riding tag for riding arenas? Is there something wrong with the Italian translation in iD? Or what is the problem?
ivanbranco (2024-03-03 19:04:16+00:00): @Hufkratzer:

I doubt he will reply to those questions, this user has 42 commented changesets and never replied even once: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=3860151
Hufkratzer (2024-03-03 20:15:48+00:00): Thanks, I've seen that meanwhile, but I think you should try it at least a few times before correcting the mistaggings. There should be a mechanism so that you can at least see if a user has read the changeset comments. Maybe there is some way to make it so that a user is automatically blocked if he has too many unread changeset comments. Has something like this ever been suggested/discussed?
eggie (2024-02-28 11:23:56+00:00): Dag Dennis.. Wanneer een bedrijf verhuist zal het adres toch nog wel blijven bestaan?

Dart heb je nu verwijderd.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=148008609
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-02-28 11:25:10+00:00): Adres hersteld
dennisdl (2024-02-28 11:34:25+00:00): Hallo Eggie, het bedrijf is verhuist en het pand wordt gesloopt. Ik was misschien iets te voorbarig, maar er is dus geen nieuwe bestemming.
eggie (2024-02-28 11:48:45+00:00): Ahh  In dat geval kun je historische  adressen verwijderen. Zie Kadaster) Zodra er gesloopt is kun je het gebouw verwijderen.
Het pand heeft al historische adressen (Die mogen weg) 
De sloopvergunning is nog niet verwerkt.
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/?searchQuery=de+vennen&objectId=0010100000014502&theme=BRT+Achtergrond&geometry.x=257596.77850000001&geometry.y=595175.5045&zoomlevel=14.689022676937586&bijbehorendeAdressen=Pand

Evt nog een terugmelding doen bij het kadaster dat het gebouw nog niet op sloopvergunning verleend staat.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-02-28 11:26:24+00:00): Hier zie ik alleen twee winkels met de naam Lidl?
dennisdl (2024-02-29 08:45:48+00:00): Hier had ik volgens mij hetzelfde gedaan, het adres van de oude Lidl verwijderd. Ik zal erop letten dat ik in zo'n geval alleen het objecttype aanpas naar adres.
eggie (2024-02-29 09:00:47+00:00): No problem... Ik kijk in 1ste instantie alleen met een analyse programma.. 
Dus wat je hebt gedaan. 
Je had het later aangepast zag ik.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=148008696

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-02-28 11:27:36+00:00): Hier heb je het adres verwijderd, maar dat is juist waardevolle informatie in OSM om een adres te vinden.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=148008725
Ik zal het herstellen.
groet
eggie
trigpoint (2024-02-28 14:20:39+00:00): Bore da
The name:cy tag you have added is in English, not Ysgol something?

Diolch Phil
likeaword (2024-02-29 08:58:02+00:00): Shw Mae Phil

The direct translation would be Ysgol Gynradd Borderbrook but both the school and Estyn seem to use the English name when communicating in Welsh which is not heard of this close to the border. I try to avoid "rogue translations". 

Though it's an interesting policy question we wrestle with at Mapio Cymru. Ysgol Gynradd Borderbrook would be a completely understandable way to refer to this school in Welsh and obviously is Welsh. 

Similarly we could always write XXXX Chapel as Capel XXXX and XXXX Church as Eglwys XXXX but currently we look for evidence of the name that is used in Welsh.

I think it's one of those areas where there isn't an obvious right answer. I also suspect it will evolve. 

I could go on at some length about these issues :-)

I welcome more discussion within the community though.

diolch Ben
likeaword (2024-02-29 08:58:34+00:00): *not _unheard_ of the close to the border
trigpoint (2024-03-09 12:55:08+00:00): Adding English names to the name:cy tag does seem to be corrupting that tag. In openstreetmap if an object has a single name then it belongs in the name tag.

Likewise for Tesco and Burger King. So not sure what you are trying to achieve with these edits, they seem to be diminishing Welsh names rather than enhancing them.

Now if there was a law to rebrand Burger King as Burger y Brennin then I would be all for it.

Diolch Phil
likeaword (2024-03-11 11:21:30+00:00): We did have a long debate about this on the Talk-GB list and the wiki entry for multi-lingual tagging in Wales reflects the outcome of that debate. That says that in instances where the name is the same in Welsh and English:

"The name: tag should contain the name. It is not, in principle, necessary to add either a name:cy or a name:en (since there is only one name in both languages). However, multi-lingual tagging in Wales is currently patchy. Adding a name:cy tag even though this will duplicate the information in the name: tag would help other mappers distinguish between cases where multi-lingual tagging has not yet been applied and cases where the name is the same in Welsh and English."

That's the process we're following. I'd argue that these are Welsh names as they are the names that are used in Welsh. 

As you identify here we're not mapping for the render since we don't currently render these names. Though we are experimenting with this approach on our pywll tywod server https://pwlltywod.mapio.cymru

We could also render these names without the name:cy tag by using the wikidata entry (we use wikidata to render quite a lot of Cymraeg names already). 

We actively think it is helpful to be unambiguous about the fact that this is the name used in Welsh (as opposed to an English name where multi-lingual tagging has not been applied).
eggie (2024-02-28 11:30:51+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
alessandrocarmeli (2024-03-04 14:54:07+00:00): io sinceramente non la metterei primary nonostante la calssificazione, non la usa nessuno. poi di var ha ben poco, dato che fai prima a passare per il centro di ronchi e monfalcone
Nathan_A_RF (2024-07-10 18:01:11+00:00): Why did you split this road into two-one-way ways where it was previously a single way? Do not split ways in two unless there is a physical divider.
Flamen_Sru (2024-07-11 11:19:28+00:00): Hi Nathan_A_RF, 
Thank you for reverting the changeset. I was following the guidelines and as per the OSM wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Dual_carriageway i modified the single carriage way to dual carriage way.
Nathan_A_RF (2024-07-11 17:31:00+00:00): That page clearly states "roads are *not* to be mapped as dual carriageways if the two directions are only separated by paint" - this is exactly the case for a part of this road.
Flamen_Sru (2024-07-18 09:59:01+00:00): Hi Nathan_A_RF,  When I made the edit I was referring to the Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Dual_carriageway  and specifically to the exception “If a road contains any of the non-appropriate elements for some short distance, but is still separated by a physical obstructions along other parts of the road in the vast majority of its length, then the road can continue to exist as a dual carriageway for the moment.”.  I assessed that the way I changed fell into this exception.  Would you share with me under what circumstances you see that this exception would apply so that I can take that into consideration in future.  Thank you
Nathan_A_RF (2024-07-18 18:07:04+00:00): That refers to proper dual carriageways, whereas in this case the road is just separated by traffic islands
Flamen_Sru (2024-07-22 07:11:23+00:00): Thank you for your valuable feedback!
ivanbranco (2024-03-03 19:13:38+00:00): Questo changeset è stato annullato dal changeset 148068109
tekim (2024-03-01 15:08:32+00:00): Hello, and welcome to OpenStreetMap.  We are not allowed to use Google Street View as a source of our edits in OSM. This is a very serious situation.
Pavel Aliakseyenka (2024-03-04 07:42:45+00:00): Hello. I understand. But latest and fresh info only from Google street view. I can reject changes and put everything back the way it was. Please, i need your advice.
tekim (2024-03-04 19:36:13+00:00): Hello again.  Thanks for the reply.  It doesn't matter if Google Street View is the only source that supports your changes, you cannot use it.   I would suggest not even looking at it.
Pavel Aliakseyenka (2024-03-06 08:01:49+00:00): Hello again tekim! I will take into account your words! Do I need to revert this changeset?
Tom Lee (2024-03-07 16:34:30+00:00): This changeset was made in error and  should be reverted. Our team has completed an initial investigation into how this occurred and will be taking steps, including retraining, to ensure it doesn't recur.
WestBam_Ukr (2024-02-28 12:24:14+00:00): https://investigator.org.ua/ua/topnews/259034/
Mazda05 (2024-02-28 15:13:46+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Russian–Ukrainian_war
WestBam_Ukr (2024-02-28 16:01:47+00:00): ваша ссылка корректна, она касается только для свободной териттории, а не оккупированной ваши друзьями из россии.
если не понимаете - воспользуйтесь гугл переводчиком.
Mazda05 (2024-02-29 04:54:35+00:00): We urge everyone to refrain from any mapping of the territory of Ukraine at the moment!
WestBam_Ukr (2024-02-29 08:19:36+00:00): So the request concerned the transfer of data about the deployment of the Armed Forces of Ukraine and critical infrastructure in free territory.
There was not a word said about the infrastructure of the Russian occupiers. It seems to me that you are more worried about the occupiers than about the cartographic community
Minh Nguyen (2024-02-29 11:22:32+00:00): Thanks for resolving note 363185. At the time, I also reached out to Kapis, the mapper who imported this and thousands of other places in Vietnam in changeset 128575.

Since it had been several years since the import, we were both unsure where the data came from, but he suggested that it might have been from CIREN by permission. If so, then we’d be able to find the data in https://geoportal-stnmt.tphcm.gov.vn/ to confirm.

Other mappers have noted the low quality of this import, so we might want to organize some sort of audit.
Minh Nguyen (2024-02-29 11:52:44+00:00): I was also suspicious of whether this import came from GNS, but it doesn’t have any record of a populated place here. The closest one is a “Ban Ni Kô” that probably refers to the village just to the west.
user_14538650 (2024-02-29 15:01:02+00:00): Thank you for the detailed response. IMO there's no real way for us to verify these names unless if someone surveys all of them in-person, so unless there's a copyright issue I think these names should be kept for now.
eggie (2024-08-21 19:07:09+00:00): Dag PP  Wanneer je bicycle =use_sidepath tagt en er is geen sidepath routeert het niet meer. Ik heb dat op de kruising verwijderd.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=148011361

MVG
eggie
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-01 10:39:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 148090564 where the changeset comment is: revert deletions in shenzen
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-01 10:39:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 148090564 where the changeset comment is: revert deletions in shenzen
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-01 10:39:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 148090564 where the changeset comment is: revert deletions in shenzen
ivanbranco (2024-03-03 19:14:49+00:00): Questo changeset é stato annullato dal changeset 148067763
pboscherini (2024-03-06 16:45:21+00:00): Good afternoon '6 giorni fa da Cebderby' and 'ivanbranco 3 giorni fa'.

I have seen the OSM full document of Tamigi river on the weburl https://www.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/relation/2263653.

1) A system or a person want to follow the Thames river
2) A system or a person have the Thames river map, only
3) A system or a person don't want to damage its ship with a missing height information of a celing (eg. a bridge)
4) A system or a person don't know that there is a bridge (very important celing constraint) at latitude 51.5087227 and longitude -0.1168938 (node n7992814756)

I think that when we built a bridge we built a complex shadow section on the waterway.

Please explain and list how many "revert" action are done on the weburl https://www.openstreetmap.org for all the users.
Regards.
Piergiorgio.
vasony (2024-03-02 21:38:44+00:00): Szia!

Nem biztos hogy a kötőjeles a helyes forma épület neveknél. Vö:
https://e-nyelv.hu/2015-04-18/roma-villa-dorottya-haz/

T.
Narvik2 (2024-03-04 07:41:35+00:00): Szia!

A Róma és a Dorottya az épületek tulajdonnevei, azért írjuk külön. Ha jelöletlen birtokviszonyban vannak, akkor kell kötőjel, pl. Jókai villája = Jókai-villa.

https://e-nyelv.hu/2020-03-19/kovacs-lakas/
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-25 17:34:12+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/86479981/history has waterway = creek that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What you meant by waterway=creek? Is not using https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Dstream intentional and wanted here? How waterway=creek differs from waterway=stream in this case?
AybegHan (2024-04-25 18:12:11+00:00): Hello there, thanks for your comment!
Since English is not my first language, I don't know the difference between a creek or stream that well honestly, but as far as I know, every flow of water can be called as a stream but since i want to specify the type of flow I didn't want to use the word "stream", also people on the internet didn't point out the differences between the name of body of waters that are different in sizes that well either so I just picked a water that is smaller than a river (which is a creek I believe) but bigger than a brook and give it the name as so since the Aksu creek or stream is not a river or a big body of water but a big enough stream that is fed by different flows of waters while also feed the main Çoruh river.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-25 19:49:53+00:00): "I didn't want to use the word "stream""

why?

Note that in OSM we in general use waterway=river and waterway=stream, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:waterway#Natural_watercourses
AybegHan (2024-04-25 19:55:28+00:00): Again, to make it more detailed. I didn't know OSM only use the word "stream" for every kind of stream other than rivers. I will fix it now. Thank you for pointing that out!
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-25 21:49:55+00:00): Thanks! Note that it will now start appearing on maps that show commonly used tags.

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Browser_cache to trigger refresh of local cache

(deliberately tagging something incorrectly to force display is bad, but here both taggings were ok - just one widely used and one extremely rare)
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-01 10:39:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 148090564 where the changeset comment is: revert deletions in shenzen
Greg91 (2024-02-29 19:40:27+00:00): Привет! Բարև ջես։

Я сделал много правок, ты много этих правок отменил. Я опирался на предписания вики (и то, что я был на местности). Например, эта дорога не разделена посередине физическим барьером, поэтому её некорректно маппить как две линии (тем более как две линии по 4 полосы).
Или многие внутриквартальные дороги я отметил, как residential, а ты вернул service, хотя service - это чисто технические, а на этих улицаю люди живут, играют дети=)

Приходи в телеграм-чат OSM в Армении - https://t.me/osm_armenia.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2024-03-01 15:52:41+00:00): Hi, are you sure that your name correction is correct? 

"s" is often transcribed as "з" in Estonian to Russian transcription, when the "s" is between the vowels.

https://www.emakeeleselts.ee/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/eskt_otsus_2008_ttab.pdf
bxl-forever (2024-02-28 13:27:43+00:00): Hello,

I get your point but how would you ensure that your edit does not violate language validation rules in this territory?  You have been changing names of NATO facilities in several places: was this discussed beforehand?
ChonkerStonker (2024-02-28 13:01:40+00:00): i removed the joel's house thing do not worry
rskedgell (2024-02-28 13:45:51+00:00): What was the journey planning problem caused by the railway station node being roughly in the centre of the station? Is this related to a particular app or website?
EBattman (2024-02-28 13:54:46+00:00): Yes the Metrobus App and Website uses OpenStreetMap for it's journey planning. Currently, despite this node being the first search result, the location itself cannot be planned to. See example: https://www.metrobus.co.uk/directions?origin%5Bname%5D=Crawley&origin%5Blocation%5D%5Blat%5D=51.110344&origin%5Blocation%5D%5Blon%5D=-0.180109&destination%5Bname%5D=Horsham+Station&destination%5Blocation%5D%5Blat%5D=51.065978&destination%5Blocation%5D%5Blon%5D=-0.318932&time%5Bwhen%5D=now
rskedgell (2024-02-28 15:46:22+00:00): Thanks. I see from the example you gave the the Crawley endpoint is the place=town node for Crawley, located in Southgate Playing Field (presumably the approximate geometric centre of the town).
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/17722928

Oddly, Metrobus's planner seems happy to use a start point in the middle of playing fields, but declines to produce a route unless the end point is changed to Horsham Station (Stop K) or Horsham Station (Stop L).

It might be worth raising this with Metrobus, as it is possible that moving the railway station node will not solve the problem. Even if it does solve it, it is also likely that someone will move it back to its original position.

If you don't have any luck with Metrobus support, you could try asking for help at https://community.openstreetmap.org/
NorthCrab_upload (2024-02-28 13:11:37+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11672519598

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
G_P_J (2024-02-28 13:25:04+00:00): Poprawione.
i2004 (2024-02-29 11:05:51+00:00): me podes ayudar por favor con la linea 31 que la tengo desordenada
kapazao (2024-04-19 05:45:56+00:00): Hi, could you explain the tag "hazard=Own Risk" and try to use a valid value?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1195160615
Regards
Szymson (2024-03-01 15:35:30+00:00): Dlaczego całe Power Center zamieniłeś na Agata Meble? Przecież tam będzie łącznie 30 obiektów handlowych
https://acteeum.pl/project/koszalin-power-center/
citrula (2024-03-01 05:16:45+00:00): Hi Eniola, welcome to OSM. If you are trying to add your address to the database, you can add a point feature which has the address. See: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses#How_to_map
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148013578
citrula (2024-03-01 05:18:45+00:00): I have reverted your previous edits because you dragged the road way around and changed the name of the road to your address. I'm happy to answer any other questions you may have.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148080658
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-29 14:56:57+00:00): thanks! I was not exactly aware that it can be result of keyboard mode accident!

Thanks for processing it

(see https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3976830 )