piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Rodrigo Rega (2024-10-28 19:27:00+00:00): Hola, cristatus: Bienvenido/a OSM. Te escribo para comentarte un par de detalles que creo que no están correctos en este conjunto de cambios:

1 - ¿Podrías comentar por qué se ha borrado este camino? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/664226129

2 - Se han añadido varios "landuse" junto a "name". Ten en cuenta que por lo general "landuse" no se acompaña de nombre. Para más información sobre esto echa un ojo a https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:landuse=residential#%C3%81reas_residenciales_con_nombre

Gracias por tus aportes a OSM. Un saludo.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158468009
cristatus (2024-10-29 10:11:22+00:00): 1.- Rodrigo eliminei o camiño porque non é tal.... é un curral e unha servidume de paso...
Na exposiión pública do inventario municipal de camiños non aparece como público
Rodrigo Rega (2024-10-29 22:35:49+00:00): Non hai problema con que en OSM existan vías que non son públicas. Tan solo hay que acompañalas coa etiqueta "access=private". Por outro lado, OSM non se nutre de documentacións oficiais (por exemplo inventarios municipáis), se non que debe refrexar a realidade.

Un saúdo.
Udarian (2024-10-28 20:18:59+00:00): what the source for this because on the Bing aerial imagery Okeechobee Frontage Road connects between the two carriageways of Northwest 138th Street Extension.
adnvadnmbasvdgh (2024-10-29 14:02:55+00:00): https://floridasturnpike.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Construction-Alert-Major-Changes-Coming-to-Okeechobee-Road-NW-138-Street-NW-107-Avenue-and-Frontage-Road-in-Miami-Dade-County.pdf
eggie (2024-10-28 18:57:16+00:00): Dag I... 
motor_vehicle= default op een paaltje. Beter niet taggen.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-10-28 18:58:08+00:00): Een paaltje kan bijna nooit fysiek op een kruispunt staan van wegen.
eggie (2024-10-28 19:21:07+00:00): Paaltje heb ik iets opgeschoven. 
Defaulttags verwijderd.
Gr eggie
eggie (2024-10-28 19:00:28+00:00): Dag Imaginous

De meeste tags zitten ingebakken in zo'n paaltje. Zie de wiki.
Alleen svp de uitzonderingen toevoegen.

MVG
eggie
CurlingMan13 (2024-10-29 00:19:25+00:00): Reviewed as requested - good edit.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158468317
Xvtn (2024-10-29 14:57:57+00:00): Hi, and thanks for your contributions here and throughout Utah! One suggestion/request I have for you is that camp pitch numbers (and most numbered things) should be ref= instead of name=. More info: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dcamp_pitch
CurlingMan13 (2024-10-29 00:19:20+00:00): Reviewed as requested - good edit.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158468428
CurlingMan13 (2024-10-29 00:19:14+00:00): Reviewed as requested - good edit.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158468601
Pieter Vander Vennet (2024-10-28 18:34:13+00:00): Revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158467174
MissMarcoPolo (2024-10-29 17:18:14+00:00): Correction: Source used was Staðfangaskrá; Esri World Imagery.
defluyter (2024-11-15 14:53:37+00:00): Hallo JTS51, er lijkt iets niet goed te gaan met de huizen aan het Oosteinde - deze staan nu allemaal in het water. Zou je dit nogmaals kunnen controleren? Alvast bedankt. Zie bijv. adres Oosteinde 68 te Berkhout.
eggie (2024-11-15 18:26:44+00:00): Scherp gezien... 
Ik heb hier de natural water maar verwijderd.

JT zal het vast wel hebben opgepakt, maar anders staat het weer een week onderwater in de nieuwe kaart update.

MVG
eggie
علي حقوي (2024-10-29 03:43:54+00:00): تغيير من محامة الليبس الى المحامه
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2024-10-29 04:59:19+00:00): تم التغيير بارك الله فيك
علي حقوي (2024-10-29 05:26:54+00:00): شاكر لك اخوي
علي حقوي (2024-10-29 17:49:46+00:00): باقي التعديل ماوضح هل يستغرق وقت
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2024-10-30 02:35:40+00:00): تم التعديل هنا في حينه، لكن البرامج المعتمدة على الخريطة قد تستغرق وقت في التعديل حسب المالك لتلك البرامج، فمثلاً أوسماند في بداية الشهر الميلادي يتم التحديث على الخريطة
demon_box (2024-10-28 19:26:34+00:00): Ciao Benvenuto in OSM! Ti segnalo che in Italia il civico identifica il punto di accesso (entrata) e NON l'intero edificio. Infatti un edificio può avere più entrate e quindi più numeri civici. 
Quindi hai 2 opzioni: 
1. Se conosci esattamente la posizione (entrata) del civico che stai mappando metti tutti i tags dell'indirizzo su un nodo del perimetro dell'edificio (aggiungendo anche il tag entrance sullo stesso nodo);
2. Se invece non hai questa informazione così precisa devi mettere tutti i tags dell'indirizzo su nodo adiacente ma STACCATO dal poligono dell'edificio.

Ho già proceduto con le correzioni del caso. Grazie e BuonMapping!
aTarom (2024-10-29 07:21:12+00:00): Hola, si us plau revisa si aquest node s'ha mogut accidentalment
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11862642953/history
ara no coincideix l'elevació, salutacions
llampec (2024-10-29 08:38:22+00:00): Si, ja està arrreglat. Gràcies.
També algun punt del curs de les rieres al voltant de Collsesviles
hfs (2024-11-15 07:47:05+00:00): Siehe auch https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159158275
CurlingMan13 (2024-10-31 16:24:54+00:00): Reviewed.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158470090
eggie (2024-10-28 19:25:47+00:00): Je vraagt feedback.
Wanneer er een bordje 461 wvs staat zal het voor iedereen gelden.
Nu wordt de soep meestal niet zo heet gegeten en wordt vaak ook access=permissive getagd. Dat routeert dan weer wel.
Vaak al reden dat het dan voor bezorgdiensten en de postbode ook routeert...  
Maar up to you.. Denk dat DHL e.d. daar binnen niets te zoeken hebben. 
Mapse
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-10-29 21:47:51+00:00): Is there a source for this?
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-10-29 21:48:14+00:00): So others don't change it back.
Thierry1030 (2024-10-29 21:50:49+00:00): To go to the airport I passed by there myself yesterday with the car. And tomorrow I will do again. I will try to make a picture ...
Tetryk (2024-11-01 10:00:49+00:00): Rozważ proszę, czy rozdzielanie jezdni dla wysepki dla pieszych jest zasadne, gdzie formalnie jezdnie jednokierunkowe są na odcinku zaledwie 7 metrów pomiędzy znakami C-10. Choć nie jest to błąd to przynosi więcej kłopotów niż korzyści dla nawigacji. Ponadto zaburzyło się wiele relacji.
literan (2024-10-29 18:10:16+00:00): откуда в Толстопальцево взялись дома с адресом по Марушкино?

в ЕГРН никакого Марушкино нет
eggie (2024-10-28 19:59:44+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-10-28 20:01:28+00:00): Dag Don....   Het gedeelte achter de poort zou je ook op access=private kunnen zetten.
MVG
eggie
DonCordarone (2024-10-29 14:03:12+00:00): Best een goed idee eigenlijk
Dodko (2024-11-17 10:03:26+00:00): Ak nie je názov ulice nedáva sa addr:suburb ale addr:place
Táto garáž https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/270396643/history je v katastrálnom území Radvaň a takú má aj adresu
https://zbgis.skgeodesy.sk/mapka/sk/zakladna-mapa/detail/ra_adresne_body/0/13862201?pos=48.709856,19.113698,18
Dodko (2024-11-17 10:59:21+00:00): Niečo som tam ešte opravil
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=159235768
maro21 (2024-10-30 21:13:58+00:00): Już trwa odbudowa mostu?
Krzemyczek (2024-10-30 21:37:41+00:00): nope, jednak kiedyś będą (mam nadzieję🫠) i wydaje mi się, że lepsze to niźli linia bez kategorii. Może, że OSM przewiduje specialny rodzaj drogi rozwalonej. Ja nie znalazłem
Krzemyczek (2024-11-17 21:15:08+00:00): cofnąłeś ten zestaw?
maro21 (2024-11-27 00:04:31+00:00): Nie. Tylko usunąłem most w budowie, której nie ma, jak sam napisałeś.
Allison P (2024-10-28 20:02:06+00:00): You should expand all abbreviations in the street name except for those that constitute a name unto themselves (so Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard rather than Martin Luther King Junior Boulevard). The address should match the road.
Rodrigo Rega (2024-10-29 22:40:39+00:00): Hola,

En esta edición se siguen añadiendo nombres a "landuse=residential", ¿has visto lo que te comenté sobre esto en?https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158468009

Por otro lado, "produce=eucalipto" me parece una etiqueta extraña no estándar, es raro que esté en español. ¿Cuál es su fuente?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158471719
eggie (2024-10-28 20:03:08+00:00): Dag Don...

Hier heb je het voetpad verbonden met de landuse=residential van Harderwijk.
Dat zal niet de bedoeling zijn.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=158471768

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-10-28 20:08:41+00:00): Voetpad heb ik losgemaakt van residential van Harderwijk
DonCordarone (2024-10-29 14:01:38+00:00): Dit zag ik niet gebeuren en was ook niet de bedoeling
eggie (2024-10-29 14:07:18+00:00): Plakken kun je voorkomen door de linker alttoets te gebruiken bij bewerken.
Wanneer een changeset zo'n groot gebied omvat is er meestal iets onwenselijks geplakt.
Maar het is in ieder geval weer actueel nu.
Mapse..
eggie
eggie (2024-10-28 20:07:04+00:00): Dag Don,

Alle verdere tags die bij een G11 fietspad horen heb je er op laten staan. Dat gaat verwarring geven.
Je hoeft niet aan te geven dat tweewielers niet op een voetpad mogen. Dat is default.
eggie (2024-10-28 20:11:25+00:00): De accesstagging heb ik aangepast op het nieuwe voetpad.
Dus moped mofa en bicycle  en verkeersbord G11 verwijderd. 
Gr eggie
DonCordarone (2024-10-29 13:51:01+00:00): Dank voor je aanvullingen, ik dacht dat het mee zou veranderen bij verandering in voetpad
eggie (2024-10-29 13:56:04+00:00): Nee.. helaas is het niet zo simpel met editor iD 😀
In editor josm zijn er wel voorselectiemogelijkheden die alles in 1x aanpassen.
Bv de tagging in het type fietspad.
Mapse
Rodrigo Rega (2024-10-29 22:42:43+00:00): Hola.

Por favor, no se deben usar abreviaturas en los nombres. Consulta lo siguiente para más información: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres#Abreviaturas_(no_hacer_esto)

Gracias por tus aportes a OSM.

Un saludo.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158471885
MissMarcoPolo (2024-10-29 17:15:46+00:00): Correction: Source used was Staðfangaskrá.
Rodrigo Rega (2024-10-29 22:43:35+00:00): El comentario de este conjunto de cambios no es lo suficientemente descriptivo para que el resto de usuarios se hagan una idea de cuáles han sido los elementos que se han editado. Por favor, consulta la siguiente página para saber como hacer comentarios que faciliten el trabajo de revisión de ediciones: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenos_comentarios_en_conjuntos_de_cambios

Gracias por tus aportes a OpenStreetMap.

Un saludo.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158472163
Xeff (2025-05-04 00:28:36+00:00): you changed the sac_scale of way 39406916 from T3 to T5 which it is clearly not. On most tour reviews it is rated from T3 to T4-, so the prior rating of T3 was certainly better
paganella31 (2025-05-05 18:45:56+00:00): Thanks for spotting the issue, actually it must have been an oversight.
demanding_mountain_hiking is indeed appropriate here (rocky terrain and some segments with steel cable)
MissMarcoPolo (2024-10-29 17:14:19+00:00): Correction: Source used was Staðfangaskrá.
DressyPear4 (2024-10-30 09:14:26+00:00): Olá, discuta com a comunidade antes de alterar a classificação de vias ou deletar qualquer coisa.
Caso continue vandalizando, seu usuário será bloqueado.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158472694
MissMarcoPolo (2024-10-29 17:05:14+00:00): Correction: Source used was Staðfangaskrá.
mcliquid (2024-10-29 10:21:25+00:00): But a path is also not track. See relevant wiki pages:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen_kartieren#Eigenst%C3%A4ndige_Wege
AT:52.17a-a is equal to DE:240:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:traffic_sign%3DDE:240
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Verkehrszeichen_in_%C3%96sterreich#%C2%A7_52.b._Gebotszeichen
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dpath#Verwendung_als_Universal-Tag

Will you do the revert or should I?
hanskuster (2024-10-29 20:33:25+00:00): As this track is also used by agricultural traffic the tagging as "track" is more appropriate.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtrack rather than as path https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpath
There is no need to revert.
mcliquid (2024-10-29 20:49:36+00:00): But it's not signed with "Landw. Verkehr frei". Just because I'm riding a bike on a sidewalk doesn't make it a bike path.
flohoff (2024-10-29 19:49:26+00:00): Moin,
nur falls du es nicht gesehen hast. Ein Reitplatz ist ein leisure=pitch + equestrian und nicht leisure=horse_riding 

Hier hat Hufkratzer das schon wieder korrigiert.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/870792310
Hufkratzer (2024-10-29 20:36:54+00:00): Weiß ich doch :)
Der Kommentar sollte wohl an https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158456061 (?)
flohoff (2024-11-04 06:44:15+00:00): Ach ja - vermutlich ;) - Ich hatte nur die 2 changesets gesehen und hab gedacht ich informiere mal den der das unmotiviert umgetagged hat. Sonst macht der das immer wieder und du kommst mit aufräumen nicht hinterher.

War wohl etwas verwirrt ;)

Flo
Hufkratzer (2024-11-04 17:58:52+00:00): Danke für die Untertützung! Kann ich gebrauchen.
Andrew Chadwick (2024-11-03 15:00:25+00:00): Should the library=* tag be removed too? Guessing it's not open-air :D

Btw, there's a separate building in Bing to the northeast of that L-shaped block. Could they have moved it?
sundew (2024-10-28 20:49:06+00:00): Korrektur:
Tour 20241003 .. Dutzow, Kneese-Dorf, Bernstorf, Stintenburger Hütte (Vor-Ort-Prüfung Postkästen, Busstops, etc.)
ilias_ (2024-10-29 11:35:08+00:00): Great work!
eggie (2024-10-29 08:46:43+00:00): 
Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
fortera_au (2024-10-28 22:29:35+00:00): Hey, service=alley won't block bicycles, cars, or foot traffic, and it does describe what this road looks like on aerial imagery.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158474387
Sam Cate (2024-10-29 01:46:34+00:00): My thoughts were that alleyways were unnamed roads whereas a service road would be named and generally with road markings and/or signage as such is the case with this one.
fortera_au (2024-10-29 02:06:53+00:00): Alleyways are a type of service road, it's meant to be for rear/side access lanes like what this looks to be.
Sam Cate (2024-10-29 02:29:13+00:00): Looking around it appears around halve the named lanes are service roads the other half are defined as alleys.

From perhaps a purely selfish point of view if both definitions could be usable 'service road' would be a better option as it links in with with apps such as wandrer.earth enthusing people to walk new 'roads.
fortera_au (2024-10-29 04:00:47+00:00): All alleyways are a service road. highway=service specifies it as a service road, and service=alley specifies what type of service road. If they've only been marked with highway=service, it's technically not incorrect, just lacking detail.

The road edited in this changeset was always a service road, it just had a service= tag set to clarify more information, it doesn't stop it being a service road.
fortera_au (2024-10-29 04:03:12+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dservice and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:service cover this and the various options for service=
Mex (2024-11-05 09:21:25+00:00): when editing consider using the overlay "cadastral parcels" in iD. This will allow you to re-register sat images to a known data source
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158474450
Xvtn (2024-10-29 14:36:26+00:00): Hi, and thanks for your contributions! In this case, were you able to verify that the trails you deleted really don't exist? What's your source for the deletions? Just because something isn't maintained or sanctioned doesn't mean it is non-existent. By leaving real features in OSM and tagging them appropriately (such as informal=yes or access=no) we can also prevent later unaware contributors from re-adding them anew (often with just highway=path...)
Xvtn (2024-10-29 14:39:43+00:00): Just to be clear, I don't think features should be blindly added, either - whether that's by copying USGS topo map or strava or whatever. I get the sense that some of these were added like that. However, in my opinion, if there's a visible trail that can be walked, it does indeed belong in OSM.
tcarlisle (2024-11-11 16:08:17+00:00): Thank you for reaching out, and apologies for the delayed response.

I completely agree on the importance of verification and careful tagging. I use multiple official public sources, such as the NFS, BLM, NPS, and local management, as well as global heatmaps, various imagery sources, and public GPX tracks. I rely on a combination of these sources rather than any one alone to ensure a comprehensive approach when updating trails.

We differ slightly on the idea that "if there's a visible trail, it belongs in OSM." Many visible trails are damaging shortcuts or closed paths, so I believe careful consideration is needed to promote sustainable trails. What we map in OSM often appears in services like AllTrails, and the public may use these trails regardless of their official status. Including informal or closed trails on the map can lead to resource damage, especially if they are unofficial or shortcut established routes. My goal is to make OSM useful while contributing to responsible trail stewardship.

In this changeset, I removed trails added by a mapper who has a tendency to include any path walked by humans. I've seen them re-map trails I've updated as closed or abandoned per local management guidelines. My intention isn’t to criticize, but to explain that they add many trails without fully considering the impact.

For trails like these, I generally use highway=abandoned and add a note to prevent reopening. I probably should have applied this more in this changeset. However, many trails—particularly on ridgelines—had no visible, walkable path according to multiple sources, so I chose to delete them instead of tagging them as abandoned or closed.

This reflects my process and methodology. I’d welcome your thoughts.

Also, thank you for all your hard work—I see the significant contributions you make throughout the state.
Xvtn (2024-12-31 22:29:42+00:00): Tcarlisle, thanks so much for your detailed response! And sorry it's taken me so long to respond. Your explanation makes sense to me!
Filip009 (2024-10-29 19:46:51+00:00): Zdravím, čo ste chceli dosiahnuť touto úpravou?
gscholz (2024-11-29 08:54:31+00:00): Hi ygtylc,
your recent edits have left behind several errors regarding overlapping ways (blue markers);

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=34.15566&lat=39.15458&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas

As you may know, this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps.

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
simer_lkpg (2024-10-28 22:45:19+00:00): Wikidata på en defibrillator? Är det verkligen nödvändigt?
salgo60 (2024-10-29 00:02:00+00:00): Nja skall kolla ;-)
ralley (2024-10-30 23:45:10+00:00): Hi, steps=yes is an actively discouraged tagging style, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dsteps
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158475197
flohoff (2024-10-29 19:42:21+00:00): Hi,
ich habe gerade diesen changeset gesehen.

Für mich ist das ein bisschen inkonsistent. Das ist ein "footway" mit "motor_vehicle=designated".

Das passt so nicht zusammen. Wenn das ein Fußweg ist dann sollten da ja keine autos fahren. 

Wenn das auch für Autos ist dann ist das kein Footway.

Wie ist das denn ausgebaut?

Flo
Vanessa4388 (2024-10-30 13:19:08+00:00): Hallo Flo,

danke für den Hinweis. Das ist tatsächlich nicht sinnvoll gewesen... Die Straße ist ausgebaut und frei für Autos. Ich habs angepasst. 

Vanessa
ralley (2024-10-29 00:09:16+00:00): You have added a park and removed a building here with only the LINZ NZ aerial imagery and no source listed.  The change does not appear in the imagery - what is the actual source?
ralley (2024-10-29 00:12:22+00:00): Bing maps show the house to the south of here appears to be gone.
BTX07 (2024-10-29 07:57:17+00:00): The latest google street view shows that the area does in fact look like a park
BTX07 (2024-10-29 07:58:52+00:00): The street view is from January of 2024. The google satellite view also shows this
BTX07 (2024-10-29 07:59:43+00:00): Sorry It was from July
❤️‍🔥 (2024-10-29 08:05:23+00:00): this was also discussed in https://osm.org/note/3518823 , it's now fixed
351293 (2024-12-02 14:35:53+00:00): Guten Tag und herzlich willkommen auf OSM,
bei Deinen Änderungssätzen sind mir ein paar Dinge aufgefallen, die noch Feinschliff benötigen. Da review requested wurde, hier folgende Tipps mit der Bitte um Prüfung/Änderung:
Der von Dir auf rw=construction gesetzte Abschnitt wird m.W.n. nur instandgesetzt, nicht neu gebaut. Da halte ich construction für overkill. Zugegebenermaßen ist dies leider aber im Bezug auf railways in OSM nicht so ausdiskutiert wie für highways. (Bei einem hw endet der tag construction mit der grundsätzlichen Befahrbarkeit, es muss also noch nicht die endgültige Fahrbahndecke aufgebracht sein) Ich empfehle aber, sich daran zu orientieren und würde hier vorerst auf disused bleiben, oder bei verstärktem Fahrzeugbetrieb dann auf rw=rail wechseln.
Bei einem Wechsel auf construction muss auch angegeben werden, was hier gebaut wird. Daher bitte, wenn construction wirklich der geeignete Tag ist auch constrution:railway=rail ergänzen und den bisherigen disused:railway=rail entfernen.
Siehe auch: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:construction#Railways

Bei der Umstellung auf construction hast Du auch maxspeed=50 hinterlegt. Wenn die Strecke tatsächlich im Bau ist, dann finden keine Fahrten oder Fahrten im Baugleis (maxspeed=20) statt. Wenn wirklich mit 50 gefahren wird, dann im Bereich der DE:EBO als Zugfahrt - dann bitte wirklich auf railway=rail umtaggen.

Grundsätzlich viel Spaß auf OSM - bei Fragen helfe ich gern weiter.
P.S. Quellenangaben sind in den Änderungssätzen, ebenso wie Beschreibungen der Änderungen, sehr gerne gesehen ;)

-351293
pavvv (2024-10-28 22:47:16+00:00): Dostęp tylko dla właścicieli to access=private.
infeeeee (2024-10-29 10:56:30+00:00): Szia!
Ilyenkor a check_date-et is frissíthetnéd, hogy mikor volt ez a kút felmérve, a bejelentő megadta ezt.
Xvtn (2024-10-29 14:30:44+00:00): Hi, thanks for your contributions! Is Guinavah-Malibu campground re-opened?
weverton_trindade (2024-10-29 15:03:18+00:00): Bom dia, por que essas avenidas são consideradas vias primárias e não secundárias?
Pt873 (2024-10-29 18:37:41+00:00): Se tratam de vias estruturais da cidade, com grande fluxo de veículos, principal acesso a uma região populosa e com faixas bem delimitadas.