piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
yvecai (2024-05-09 06:30:20+00:00): Sans commentaires 8-|
NeisBot (2024-04-21 06:04:03+00:00): Hello CMS168, thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.Please see https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 

Thanks!

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
CurlingMan13 (2024-04-09 03:52:18+00:00): Do not partially overlap areas.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149711793
BCNorwich (2024-04-09 06:45:30+00:00): Hi, Your footway areas tagged area:highway=footway and surface=asphalt should also include the tag highway=footway. They will then be rendered properly.

Regards Bernard.
groenroos (2024-04-09 23:07:29+00:00): Thank you for the suggestion! I've done this now, hopefully it will now display as intended!
julcnx (2026-06-16 04:03:57+00:00): Hi, some of the ways tagged `surface=clay` in this changeset appear to be laterite roads. `surface=laterite` was approved on 2026-06-15 and describes this surface more precisely. Would you be comfortable retagging? Happy to do it if you prefer. More info: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface=laterite
pfg21 (2024-04-08 14:08:38+00:00): senhor :) nem sequer é um bunker secreto, e nem sequer é de Putin :) 
não leiam a imprensa sensacionalista - tem um efeito negativo no cérebro :)
TrickyFoxy (2024-04-08 20:00:42+00:00): Please note that the bunker does not have a name even in the Wikipedia article.

https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Бункер_Путина#Бункеры

Also re-read the article about bunker_type

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bunker_type

It’s not for me to advise anything, but drawing individual trees from blurry satellite images is a useless task.
Lucas Marques (2024-04-14 16:55:02+00:00): Привет, друг pfg21 и TrinkyFoxy, прошу прощения за то, что так долго отвечал, я очень рад общаться с людьми со всего мира. ( ͡ᵔ ͜ʖ ͡ᵔ) «Очевидно», что бункер не секретный, на самом деле «ничего» не секретно. Пресса действительно может оказывать негативное воздействие на мозг, а также на духовные и религиозные знания, а также на вещества, вводимые в организм человека. Википедия не является надежным источником информации. Не мне что-либо советовать, но верить в ложные обещания - бесполезное занятие, так же, как и делать вывод, что мои спутниковые снимки размыты. Пусть Бог осветит путь всем вам.
TrickyFoxy (2024-04-14 17:01:48+00:00): 0. It is better to write in your native language.  Machine translation has killed your meaning and sarcasm
1. Judging by your edits, you did not read the link to the OSM wiki
2. What is your source of information if you decide that the information on Wikipedia is not correct?
TrickyFoxy (2024-04-14 17:04:26+00:00): 3. And you also got carried away and forgot what language should be in the name
pfg21 (2024-04-15 11:31:13+00:00): nae:uk == name:ru :)   
вы не боитесь своей мдевежьей помощью разозлить украинцев :) они за язык могут серьезно обидеться.
посоветую в дальнейшем делать только то что знаете и понимаете и не лезть в чужой монастырь со своими хотелками :)
gymate (2024-10-23 21:22:37+00:00): Szia! Köszi, hogy javítottad a 1315060018-as node-ot (Zsiráf Tranzit)! Valóban nem rendelkezik házszámmal. 

Egyébként miért helytelen rárakni az utcanevet? A honlapjukon is "Bukarest utca, 1114" szerepel címként.
urbalazs (2024-10-30 14:52:06+00:00): Azért teszünk címet egy üzletre, hogy meg lehessen keresni. Egy csonka cím alapján nem fogja megjeleníteni egyetlen kereső sem, amelyben a teljes címre keresel.
archpdx (2024-04-07 23:14:00+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Thanks for mapping these houses. Please note however that the name field isn't used to describe features in OSM (see https://osm.wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions).
CurlingMan13 (2024-05-02 20:46:03+00:00): The names still need to be removed from all the houses, but the changesets beyond that tiny error look fantastic!
ablevi202 (2024-05-02 20:59:04+00:00): Removed all the names in this one blob, not sure if there are any else
wambag (2024-04-07 23:29:05+00:00): This subdivision was added to the map in 2019, but no aerial shots before or since show this was built or even ever existed. Moreover, it appears the town line was shifted on the map. Searching the internet did not reveal any plans or discussion on such a development or a shifting of the boundary. The town line was reestablished using the MassGIS L3 Parcels overlay, and the buildings and roads were tagged "proposed" to maintain them as hidden placeholders.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-06-04 23:50:34+00:00): Please don't edit major highways unless you can ensure no broken relations or missing tags
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149713167
Baloo Uriza (2025-10-10 20:50:00+00:00): names aren't refs; there's no reason to duplicate the description of a route relation to the name (and misleading since some routes do have names).
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149713420
Baloo Uriza (2025-10-14 14:55:46+00:00): Is this US 271 Bus route or US 271 Business?  If it's a business route, it should have business spelled out to avoid ambiguation.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149713420
AntMadeira (2024-04-08 16:45:51+00:00): Olá.
Vi que adicionaste o sítio arqueológico de Colipo, mas em que te baseaste para criar aquela área?
Repara que este sítio já estava mapeado como um ponto.

Cumprimentos,
António Madeira.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149713421
meioserrano (2024-04-08 17:10:52+00:00): Olá, a fonte foi esta, tendo o poligono sido feito por aproximação (envolvente) do apresentado no estudo.
Não coloquei a fonte mas de facto está em falta, vou corrigir quando puder
https://www.academia.edu/45399740/A_arquitectura_dom%C3%A9stica_de_Collippo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149713421
AntMadeira (2024-04-08 21:18:56+00:00): Obrigado pelo esclarecimento.
Desconhecia que a área era assim tão abrangente. Pensei que apanhava apenas o lado oeste da EM 543.
Assim sendo, o melhor era incorporar os dados do ponto previamente existente nessa área e depois adicionar esse mesmo ponto sem dados ao perímetro da área que criaste, para preservar o seu histórico.
jerome92370 (2024-04-23 23:04:44+00:00): Bonjour,
Vous avez cassé la relation 16180587.
Je vous remercie de bien vouloir la remettre telle qu’elle était avant vos modifications.
Merci.
user_2735 (2024-04-24 01:32:12+00:00): A quoi voyez-vous qu'elle est cassée ? cf https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16180587#map=18/45.94969/6.75329
jerome92370 (2024-04-24 13:26:11+00:00): Le profil d'altitude n'était plus correct (plusieurs trous). Je viens de voir à l'instant que ça a été corrigé.
Merci.
willkmis (2024-04-08 04:49:20+00:00): Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap! In this change, it looks like you added crime=robbery and date=* tags to a variety of roads and businesses. Can you clarify what purpose these serve? Note that OpenStreetMap is a public database that records real-world data.

-Will
Glassman (2024-04-08 18:28:53+00:00): I reverted your addition of robbery reports to OSM objects. OSM isn't the place for crime reports. Creating a map with crime reports using OSM as a basemap is acceptable. Let me know if you have any questions.
jtracey (2024-04-08 00:58:04+00:00): resolves https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4187606
WC392309 (2024-04-13 02:20:14+00:00): I agree with this decision, however, this creates a primary stub with SR 237 and US 20. I would upgrade the stretch of SR 237 to primary and Sloane to secondary
user_11609320 (2024-04-08 01:59:08+00:00): i am assuming it is a parsing error because the other riverside neighborhoods show up when searching for them. will add again
jhaluska80 (2024-04-08 02:59:49+00:00): Just FYI, there natural water pools are for non man made water bodies, like lakes and ponds.  Search for swimming pool and you'll get the right tag.

Also if you know a building is a house, you can tag it as a house and not just a building.

Instead of just tagging as a building, if you know it is a house, you can tag it as a house.  Most houses in the US are actually "detached houses" which is even more informative.

...yes there are a lot of tags, but you learn them one at a time.
muralito (2024-04-08 04:31:01+00:00): ¿La chicharra no cerro?
la ultima vez que pase por esa esquina no estaba.
UYMapper (2024-04-18 01:26:03+00:00): No, está activo el local.
Creo que antes estaba en otro lado (no recuerdo dónde), pero ya hace bastante que se encuentra allí.
N1T3R (2024-04-08 04:19:11+00:00): Please check if you added incorrect land use tag which might be a building.
HikeAndMap (2024-04-08 10:51:20+00:00): When adding amenities, shops, etc please try to not put the nodes on top of each other
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149716199
amtplskaart (2024-12-21 00:59:51+00:00): Judging by the width of this segment, it is to narrow to be a tertiary road. But as a tertiary function, I think it can serve as tertiary road, although it is not a high priority road. In my opinion, this road is "unclassified" as it previously tagged.
PusurRiver (2024-12-26 23:16:16+00:00): Hello amtplskaart, I upgraded this highway to tertiary following the guidance provided by the Indonesian OSM wiki page (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Indonesian_Tagging_Guidelines#Roads).  Although this section of highway is narrow it provides connectivity to this secondary highway https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/319248834 and contributes access to the region of Puri Cendana, Indonesia(https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11982910144). If you are familiar with this region and can confirm this highway is lower priority I will defer to your knowledge of the area, thank you and have a nice day.
jhaluska80 (2024-04-08 09:27:28+00:00): At the top of iD (the OSM web editor) there are Point, Lines and Areas.  You added this swimming pool with a line (also known as a way in OSM jargon) which isn't valid and won't render on the final map.  Lines typically are roads, power lines, fences, and very skinny items.

The correct way to do swimming pools is to use the Area and then search for swimming pool.

Hope this helps.
Allison P (2024-04-08 13:58:41+00:00): An area is not a real thing in the OSM software. It's just a closed way as identified by iD. The real issue is that swimming_pool=water is an unrecognized tag. You should use leisure=swimming_pool instead.
MxxCon (2024-04-09 04:01:29+00:00): Hello.
Instead of outright deleting a node of a closed biz, it's much better to use lifecycle prefix tags as documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused:* or at the very least delete just biz-specific tags, but leave address info intact. Doing that not only preserves history of this osm, which can be useful to refer to in the future, but also allows this address to still be searchable and navigable.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149716952
Bagelthebeagle (2024-04-09 15:19:40+00:00): Hi, thank you for the tip, do you know how I can undelete it? I can't seem to find a way.
MxxCon (2024-04-11 01:13:33+00:00): I used https://revert.monicz.dev/ to specify this changeset id to rollback your deletion and then I tagged that biz disused: to indicate that it's closed. https://osmcha.org/changesets/149843530
Bagelthebeagle (2024-04-11 15:36:34+00:00): Thank you!
fortera_au (2024-04-08 04:49:59+00:00): Hey there, do you know what data SAPPA maps uses for their road names? I can't see any licensing information in their system. It might be coming from DataSA's Roads dataset (which we have a waiver to cover the CC 4.0 BY parts we can't comply with), but unless we're 100% sure then we can't use that source.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149716956
fortera_au (2024-04-16 23:07:57+00:00): I've confirmed we don't have permission to use SAPPA maps, however the DataSA Roads dataset does confirm that these are the current names. In future, please make sure you're using sources we have permission to use.
MxxCon (2024-04-09 04:02:38+00:00): Hello.
Is "Skyline Princess Gangway" the officially documented name of this feature or is this just a name that you came up with?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149717007
kagebar (2024-04-08 08:29:58+00:00): Не використовуйте тег name для опису стану доріг, він лише для власних назв
brdrsrsu (2025-11-07 22:14:09+00:00): Hello Julia, OSM is an open database of map / cartographic data. You are not supposed to be creating personal location bookmarks on the public map, especially in a language completely foreign to the country you are just a visitor in. This is akin to vandalism, so please stop.
DD1GJ (2024-04-09 07:32:00+00:00): Mit der Entfernung von building=* "zerstörst" Du das Gebäude. Zudem solltest Du für social_facility ausschließlich die im Wiki definierten Werte verwenden.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:social%20facility

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf
HikeAndMap (2024-04-08 10:45:31+00:00): Hi there, may I know your source of information to add this to OpenStreetMap?

Thank you
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149718361
bxl-forever (2024-04-12 22:49:39+00:00): Hello,

Please do not redraw buildings by tracing on aerial imagery.  Those pictures are different every year and *never* show the real location of buildings because of image distorsion.

Buildings should be traced on numerical imagery.  For BE/Wallonie, use SPW(allonie) PICC imagery.

Can you please undo your changes.
walloHerbrechtingen (2024-09-18 13:20:38+00:00): Hallo Codde1982,
dass Haltestellen keine aktuellen Namen haben ist ein Fehler. Aber diese Haltestelle heisst trotzdem nach wie vor Zoeppritex. Erst muss der htv / die Gemeinde Gerstetten die Umbenennung machen, dann können wir Mapper dem auch folgen. 
Ich könnte dir einige solche Haltestellen nennen, die nicht mehr atuell sind.
Wir Mapper bilden den Zustand ab, der vor Ort vorzufinden ist. Nicht aber, was eigentlich richtiger wäre. (Hab aber jetzt nicht vor Ort nachgeguckt, nur in der Tabelle 70 und in EFA-BW)
Du bist halt deiner Zeit voraus!

Map On!
Reinhard
trial (2024-06-12 21:02:44+00:00): Le propriétaire a-til vraiment demandé à mal écrire Avenue de Paris ?
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2024-06-13 08:29:30+00:00): Bonjour,

Nous ne comprenons pas votre question
Cordialement,
L'Equipe DB
trial (2024-06-13 15:53:37+00:00): J'ai pourtant fait le commentaire sur la modification problématique et non sur une de vos modifications ultérieures.
Puisque ça ne vous semble pas évident - j'ai l'impression désagréable de devoir mettre le chat le nez dans sa m... pour qu'il comprenne - regardez l'historique des modifications :
https://osm.mapki.com/history/node/11409327769
Cayenne17, qui lui n'est pas payé pour ça, corrige votre entrée incorrecte "Av. De Paris" en une entrée propre (pas d'abréviation, respect de la casse) : "Avenue de Paris".

Que vous (et vos clients) aient des attentes qualitatives inférieures aux standards OSM je peux le concevoir (merci dans ce cas de ne pas utiliser OSM), mais A MINIMA ayez le respect des contributeurs tels que Cayenne17 en de remettant pas VOS erreurs sur des données déjà corrigées.
Appellez ça comme vous voulez (respect, politesse,...), mais faites-le.
Merci d'avance
vasony (2024-04-12 04:26:12+00:00): reverted to disused

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history
maraf24 (2024-04-09 16:54:38+00:00): Przywróciłem poprzednią pozycję.
pavvv (2024-04-09 16:58:17+00:00): powód?
maraf24 (2024-04-09 18:44:36+00:00): Co ma środek osiedla administracyjnego do położenia nazwy? Gdzie jest napisane, że ma być pośrodku?
Węzeł jest tam, gdzie historycznie jest lokowany Tarnogaj.
pavvv (2024-04-09 19:06:30+00:00): Na wiki jest napisane, że label nie koniecznie ma być na geograficznym środku, ale w "logicznym centrum" lub miejscem gdzie schodzi się dużo ludzi, takim jak rynek. Takim miejscem nie jest środek residential area i ogólnie raczej nie ma tu takiego miejsca, podobnie jak na większości osiedli. OSM nie jest do mapowania historii, więc dlaczego to tam miałby się znajdować label? Najlepsze będzie usytuowanie go po środku.
maraf24 (2024-04-09 20:11:40+00:00): Ale to nie jest label. Label nie pasuje do OSM, to była koncepcja pod render, a my nie mapujemy pod render.
To jest lokalizacja nazwy geograficznej, a jej współrzędne nie są znikąd, tylko są jak najbardziej oficjalne i pochodzą z PRNG.
Osiedla administracyjne Wrocławia w ogóle nie powinny mieć węzłów label ani admin_centre. Imho.
NicaTopo (2024-04-08 12:27:47+00:00): Hi Shunsuke, can you please square buildings before uploading them? With the iD editor it's just a "Q" key on an activated frame. Thank you.
bxl-forever (2024-04-12 22:28:05+00:00): Hello et bienvenue,
Attention, name=Piscine n'est pas accepté sur OSM.
Une description n'est pas un nom.  That’s what tags are for (leisure=swimming_pool is enough).
Nous avons corrigé.
Kovoschiz (2024-04-08 07:56:29+00:00): 1. Please don't add `tourism=aquarium` inside a `=theme_park` 
2. Please don't use `tourism=attraction` with `attraction=` facilities
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2024-04-27 11:22:46+00:00): Er du sikker på at ALDI i Haderslev Laurids Skaus Gade er blevet til en REMA 1000. Den er ikke på Remas hjemmeside.  Og ifølge JV bliver det ikke en REMA 1000

https://jv.dk/haderslev/fremtiden-for-tom-aldi-butik-afsloeres-maaske-snart
Lytter1 (2024-04-27 16:34:53+00:00): Jeg mente jeg havde fået den fjernet igen, da jeg læste senere at den ikke kom alligevel. Nå men jeg ser den er der alligevel, så jeg får den fjernet. Tak for info.
Tesla (2024-04-08 10:18:26+00:00): Бачу що ви робите подібні правки по всій Україні. Звідки берете дані?
Oleksii Cherniavskyi (2024-04-08 14:48:57+00:00): Доброго дня! Інформація від водіїв та користувачів служби таксі
GrygoriiUA (2024-04-09 05:58:31+00:00): Добрий день. А коли данні оновлюються?
woodpeck_repair (2024-04-08 08:24:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149723275 where the changeset comment is: remove undiscussed and buggy import
woodpeck (2024-04-08 08:25:40+00:00): Hello chanchanxxi, I have removed your data import as it has erroneously used waterway=canal for irrigation infrastructure and uploaded lots of meaningless relations to OSM. Please discuss any data imports with the community before you act.
STV87 (2025-12-04 10:33:48+00:00): Hej,
Du har lavet vådområde på en stor del af et areal hvor der er skov/krat, og ikke særlig meget vådområde.
Jeg undre mig lidt, da jeg har noget af jorden i området, og det er bestemt ikke et vådområde.
Hvad er din kilde?

Bh Simon
whb (2024-09-10 09:06:24+00:00): Guten Tag,

hier wird berichtet, dass die Datumsangabe nicht richtig erfolgte:
https://github.com/osmandapp/OsmAnd/issues/20798

Laut der verwendeten Schreibweise von https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours sollte statt "17 Jun 2024-07 Jul 2024" nämlich "2024 Jun 17-2024 Jul 07" verwendet werden.

Da der Zeitraum hier schon vorbei ist, kann die Sperrung in diesem Fall auch direkt entfernt werden.

Viele Grüße
whb
mcliquid (2024-09-10 10:35:15+00:00): Danke, kannst du gerne machen.
whb (2024-09-10 10:42:09+00:00): Soeben erledigt.
mcliquid (2024-09-10 11:23:08+00:00): Danke dir!
NorthCrab_upload (2024-04-08 08:30:28+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11801550383
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/164035205

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
woodpeck_repair (2024-04-08 08:24:49+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 149722972.
Hufkratzer (2024-04-08 22:18:06+00:00): Hi,
ich kenne das Objekt nicht, aber deinen Kommentar finde ich trotzdem seltsam. Reitanlage, Reitstall, das ist doch das gleiche, siehe
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure=horse_riding
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity=stables
Billy Rex (2025-08-12 07:09:16+00:00): Sehe den Kommentar jetzt erst. Muss nochmal schauen, wie ich mich dazu informieren lassen kann. Hast Recht, dann wars aber auch schon von Anfang an falsch. Ich korrigiere das mal, wenns nicht schon korrigiert wurde.
segubi (2024-08-24 21:37:46+00:00): Da ist etwas schief gelaufen und eine neue Relation Paderborner Rundtour erstellt worden mit nur einem Mitglied. Habe ich gelöscht und dies Mitglied in die ursprüngliche Relation überführt.
fortera_au (2024-04-11 11:58:54+00:00): Hi, private swimming pools should not be named, and name= is not for descriptive names.
fortera_au (2024-04-11 12:00:04+00:00): And they should be tagged as leisure=swimming_pool (as well as access=private for private ones), not natural=water.
nevw (2024-04-08 10:17:20+00:00): leisure=swimming pool is the correct tag
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=swimming_pool
Backyard swimming pools are not named, the correct tags for swimming pools are sufficient. Commercial swimming pools likely do carry a name.
nevw (2024-04-12 08:15:54+00:00): no response, last few fixed now.
nevw (2024-04-08 10:20:14+00:00): Some of the buildings you have mapped are not done accurately and also you could usually press Q on selection of the building to square the corners, unless they have other than squared corners.
angys (2024-04-08 16:08:45+00:00): this should be backelane, tag as alley
mjmouse (2024-04-15 07:51:26+00:00): Thankyou
mcliquid (2024-04-08 10:45:42+00:00): Änderungen rückgängig gemacht, da "playground:theme" an ein "leisure=playground" gehört und nicht an ein einzelnes Spielgerät.
cuzi (2024-04-08 12:42:39+00:00): I think this is incorrect. 
Worldwide, according to https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/ there there are currently:

~301000 type=multipolygon with landuse=residential

~8100 type=boundary with landuse=residential
JSteinba (2024-04-08 15:37:50+00:00): What would you suggest for Grunbach Nord? Making this relation a proper administrative boundary?
cuzi (2024-04-08 17:18:53+00:00): I don't actually know the local situation, what is "Grunbach Nord"? 

If you know the administrative boundary, then yes I would suggest to use a second area/relation for that, because the residential area doesn't include the school, church and graveyard and the commercial area Breitwiesen, but presumably they are part of the administrative area.

Alternatively a single node in the center - maybe "place=suburb" or "place=neighbourhood" - if you don't know the exact boundary.
JSteinba (2024-04-08 18:08:35+00:00): I sadly don't know the exact boundary. I just stumbled upon this as there is an inconsistency on how the residential areas around here are mapped. Below Remshalden (relation with id 401645) there are no administrative areas in OSM. The residential area to the east is mapped as a closed way (id 11967469) and also includes a cemetery.