piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2025-03-07 15:07:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:06:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:06:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:08:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:06:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:07:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:06:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:08:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:06:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:05:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:06:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:09:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:08:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:08:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:08:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:07:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:09:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:08:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
Frans S (2025-01-21 09:12:20+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping. Please map the next time more accurate and square your rectangular buildings. (most of your mappings are inaccurate !)
Best regards and keep mapping
mavl (2025-03-07 15:07:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:08:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:07:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
Hungerburg (2025-01-17 09:58:23+00:00): Der Name gehört auch noch weg. Amtlich (tiris) hat die keinen Namen, bzw. heißt beim Forst "Gnadenwalder Vorberg".

Ich würde auch noch das Stück beim Parkplatz herunterstufen.

access= auch in Frage. Zu Fuß darf man wohl immer? Also vehicle=permissive?

Wie markiert man, dass Rad keine Maut zahlt?

Seh gerade, teils ist das schon angegangen worden. Ich übernehme ;)
Hungerburg (2025-01-17 10:24:28+00:00): Hmm, permissive ist wohl überhaupt falsch, Maut allein reicht schon? Was meinst du?
fs_LT (2025-01-20 06:34:00+00:00): das wiki kennt sonst noch toll:motor_vehicle=yes, aber ich bin mir gar nicht sicher ob das so zutrifft?

zu "permissive" und "toll"; das wiki empfiehlt das wegen der Routing-Engines, was hier aber keine Rolle spielt, kann von mir aus also weg
mavl (2025-03-07 15:06:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:06:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:05:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:06:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:07:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:06:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:08:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:06:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:08:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:07:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:09:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
NorthCrab_upload (2025-01-17 06:11:22+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Zawoja":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12508700951
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12508700952
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12508700953

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
mavl (2025-03-07 15:06:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mrpulley (2025-05-19 22:22:49+00:00): Way 70516681 (Forest Reefs Road) - maxspeed recently reduced from 70 to 60 (not 80). Corrected at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166432764
mrpulley (2025-12-13 10:15:10+00:00): 54683431 - northern end 50, remainder maxspeed 70 correct. Fixed. at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175667122
mavl (2025-03-07 15:09:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:09:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
citrula (2025-01-17 07:31:52+00:00): Welcome to OSM! highway=cycleway is probably not appropriate for single track paths, I would personally use highway=track - otherwise these changes look good.

The wiki has some documentation on tagging for mountain biking, in general - it's a great place to start.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mountain_biking
mavl (2025-03-07 15:08:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:09:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
Glassman (2025-01-17 16:14:37+00:00): #TIP: Leave brief changeset comments when saving and uploading your edit. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments for more information
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161442821
H4N5-antw (2025-02-24 11:08:46+00:00): Dear Kaduna,
Don't know from where on the planet you're editing, but the way was removed after roadworks ; please refer to recent Mapillary pictures before assuming thaty locals must have overlooked this way.
Kaduna (2025-02-25 04:11:56+00:00): Thank you for reaching out to me. I referred to Bing Street Level imagery from May 2024 and verified it with several Mapillary tracks using the date filter options. After receiving your message, I cross-verified my edits with other available tracks and observed construction work done on the slip road, which aligns with your input. I made additional data fix by removing the unnecessary right turn restriction from the main road, as turning right is now possible.
H4N5-antw (2025-02-25 11:52:54+00:00): Thank you for the prompt reply ; mention Mapillsry as that is often fresher than Bing or Google, as local and passing-by photographers can upload on a daily basis whereas the big names send out their scouts once in a while, then seem to take a while to process and publish. 

Having said that, Antwerpen is unbelievably active updating and rearranging the underground and road infrastructure, shifting away from the reliance on motorcars introduced ca. 1970 to pedestrian, bicycle and public transport. 

Could use help with updating, but this often needs local ground work to know what needs to be changed as opposed to what is largely cosmetic. 

There are several regional Flemish or national Belgian government sources available: in iD one could look for 'DigitaalVlaanderen' : 'most recent' and 'preliminary' aerial imagery, and 'GRB', which is based on official Roads and Land Ownership Registry data.  

But even GRB still shows the grey line for the slip road. That makes mappers undoing recent 'real world' changes to re-introduce the former situation a bane of editing OSM.

Adding concise notes what was changed and referring to photos would be one way, but also requires knowledge of the Wegcode = highway code ... 

... so for now just cycling round, two cameras on the helmet to at least document what has changed and hope a distant mapper will pick the correct sequence : for example https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=897302919224104. 

Thank you for picking up on the right turn restriction. 

Met vriendelijke groet, 
Hans
H4N5-antw (2025-02-25 12:07:23+00:00): After thought : surprised by the existence of the Tomtom traces 21 Dec'24 - 16 Jan'25, as slip was inaccessible from early July'24, then razed and replaced : would you have a way of reaching out to TomTom to alert them, please? 

(seen the 'private' email address on the 'about you' page, so : yes!) 

One way to 'publish' noticed but not acted on changes : dated notes on a uMap  page, publish once in a while? 

Best,
Kaduna (2025-02-27 05:07:31+00:00): Hi H4N5-antw, 
Thank you once again for the detailed explanation about this case. I have provided the information to our project owner.
sbaido (2025-02-27 17:03:25+00:00): Hello H4N5-antw,

Thank you for your valuable insights. I've added your comments regarding the rapid changes in Antwerp, Belgium, to our GitHub page ([Belgium | Data Improvements](https://github.com/tomtom-international/open-data/issues/161)) and attributed them to you.

Could you please review the "sources" section on the GitHub page and confirm if you're comfortable with how your contribution is represented? If you'd like any changes, please let me know, and I'll adjust it accordingly.

Thank you again for your input.
mavl (2025-03-07 15:07:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:06:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:08:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:09:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:05:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:06:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:06:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:07:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:08:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:09:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
AngocA (2025-01-17 17:32:54+00:00): Hi Alex
I see we are having a mapping conflict in this area. Let's continue the conversation in https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/notification-to-prevent-an-edit-war-in-qatar-with-mapbox/124481 and define a solution.
mavl (2025-03-07 15:05:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:06:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:08:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:07:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-05-13 15:03:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
Herwescheluc (2025-01-17 12:23:09+00:00): Hallo, GV_Eschenburg,
habe das Feuerwehrgebäude in Wissenbach neu als Gesamtgebäude erfaßt und Eure 3 fire_station in building:part geändert. Wenn Euch so eine "Bauweise" nochmal unterkommt, könnt Ihr da "abschreiben"...
Grüße aus Herborn
Andreas
NeisBot (2025-02-08 08:06:11+00:00): Hi Abedul Bouleau, thank you for your contribution to the OSM project.

Over your latest stretch of time, you've made at least 45 changesets with minimal or no meaningful comments.

To enhance collaboration, please consider using the comment field to describe your map changes. This helps others understand and follow your adjustments more easily. You can find guidance on good changeset comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 

Thanks!

I've also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
NorthCrab_upload (2025-01-17 07:20:42+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8100430675
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1352006923

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
soliMM (2025-01-17 16:19:50+00:00): Hi, what is the reason for deleting this building and corresponding POI? Is building demolished or what is the case here?

It would be helpful if you would provide more information about your edits in changeset comment.
joost schouppe (2025-01-22 15:27:39+00:00): Goed gespot. Ik heb ook de adressen op de huizen aangepast nu. GRB achtergrond is hier nog fout, maar de extra laag straatnamen op geopunt is wel al (grotendeels) juist. Ik deed via Lara nog een melding over het stukje ten oosten van hier, dat nog fout is in de officiele data