piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
DD1GJ (2024-02-23 16:58:45+00:00): Hallo Touristinfo Fürstenstein,

willkommen bei OpenStreetMap und danke für die Informationen.

In https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=147825276 habe ich einige typische und zu Beginn vorkommende Fehler behoben:

doppelte Wegführung auf bereits vorhandenen Straßenstücken, doppelte Wegführung im westlichen Teil, gemeinsame Punkte mit Gebietsgrenzen.  Selbst aufgezeichnete GPX-Tracks haben meistens einige "komische"Ecken" und sollten anhand des Luftbildes und Ortskenntnissen in einer etwas geglätteten Form nachgezeichnet werden.

Weitere Tipps und Tricks gibt es im Tutorial: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Viele Grüße, Joachim
Syl (2024-02-23 13:05:31+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai un doute sur le type de verre accepté, ce genre de borne se limite généralement aux bouteilles et bocaux en verres.
Celle-ci accepte vraiment tous les types de verre ?
Matssi (2024-02-23 13:35:10+00:00): Hello,

Exact, je viens de faire la modification :) Merci beaucoup!
NorthCrab_upload (2024-02-23 09:50:15+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3801408824

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
gscholz (2024-02-24 06:28:05+00:00): Hi william bonya,
this changeset has created errors regarding self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=39.27000&lat=-6.84978&zoom=17&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=147804822

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Negreheb (2024-02-23 10:26:47+00:00): Wenn das jemand reverten möchte, weil viel falsch oder whaterver, go for it, ich fange deswegen keinen Edit-War an. Ich dachte mir nur, ich versuche die Situation zu verbessern, weil es im Forum aufkam.
rskedgell (2024-07-18 14:24:52+00:00): The crossings you tagged with crossing:markings=dashes are unmarked crossings and should be tagged as crossing:markings=no. Pedestrian crossings on public highways in the UK are not marked with dashes.

The dashed lines adjacent to those crossings are give way markings. They have nothing to do with pedestrian crossings.
Intrigued (2024-07-18 16:39:20+00:00): Hi rskedgell,
I genuinely have no idea why I did this. If not already done so, I'll correct this when I get to my PC. Apologies.
rskedgell (2024-07-18 18:46:11+00:00): No problem, already updated.

Thanks for adding sidewalks and crossings in London, btw.
eggie (2024-02-23 13:06:37+00:00): Dag Brw Twente..  Je vraagt feedback  .. Lijkt me oke zo.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-02-23 12:55:42+00:00): Welkom bij OSM..  De info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adres.
MVG
eggie
NorthCrab_upload (2024-02-23 10:50:18+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8429133978
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/907760919

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
DD1GJ (2024-02-23 23:17:40+00:00): revert, war über bereits bestehende Straßen gezeichnet. Bitte nochmal prüfen.
DD1GJ (2024-02-23 23:34:56+00:00): Überlappende Wege und falscher Anschluss an Gemeindegrenze wurden korrigiert
Udarian (2024-03-04 05:47:25+00:00): can you see if your imagery shows and changes to the alignment of the HEFT Northwest 170th Street interchange their building (I already have some construction ways mapped based on what it seams the interchange will look like in the end (I seem to remember seeing somewhere that it will be a diverging diamond))
smikhnouski_lyft (2024-03-04 09:43:56+00:00): HI!
According to the Lyft-owned satellite from December 2023 the intersection is still under construction and without a solid surface (https://drive.google.com/file/d/16nXVIZq31GQ5vq6jlCZ7-z5-GI0K-rdl/view?usp=sharing ), also there are no Lyft drivers’ tracks.
And this is street level image taken from the HEFT and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/83194112 (25.9308967, -80.3716766) intersection https://drive.google.com/file/d/1bullhAmkPpomC9ZSaEiidOyEqXQ_TAfQ/view?usp=sharing 
If you have any questions feel free to contact me.
Best regards, Stepan
DD1GJ (2024-02-23 23:44:58+00:00): korrigiert, war mit Gebietsgrenze anstatt Weg verknüpft
DD1GJ (2024-02-23 23:53:55+00:00): Korrigiert, Wegende war mit Siedlungsfläche anstatt Straße verknüpft
Dilxe (2024-03-06 16:09:35+00:00): Boas. Alteraste a modificação que fiz nas Escadinhas Moura. Voltaste a colocar como estrada. Importas-te de reverter?
kcpels (2024-03-06 21:20:47+00:00): Sim descupla, vou fazer agora esta revisão.
Dilxe (2024-03-06 21:53:52+00:00): Obrigado!
DiogoBaptista98 (2025-01-02 05:48:56+00:00): Deixo uma nota, de acordo com as normas padronizadas do OSM não se separam vias se não existe uma separação física real no local ou se a distancia das vias é grande o suficiente que o justifique, visto isto refiz o cruzamento da rua principal com a estrada dona beatriz. cumprimentos
NorthCrab_upload (2024-02-23 11:20:25+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11656003074

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
kortgodt (2024-02-23 11:57:52+00:00): Vesterlund sommerhusområdet er beliggende i skov der er ligeledes skiletet som sådan når du kører ind i området og det fremgår ligeledes af sdfi-kort og foto. Hvorfor ændre du mit edit?
osmviborg (2024-02-23 12:10:46+00:00): Området er fyldt med bygninger. Plant gerne træer mellem husene. Hvad har SDFI kortet med OSM at gøre?
kortgodt (2024-02-23 12:16:56+00:00): der kan ikke ligge bygninger i et skovområde? Det er skilet som skov når du ankommer til området.
osmviborg (2024-02-23 12:20:59+00:00): Tegn verden som den ser ud.
osmviborg (2024-02-23 12:28:19+00:00): Fra folderen: 'Det er et naturskønt område tæt på skov' https://www.vesterlundgrundejerforening.dk/
kortgodt (2024-02-23 12:45:04+00:00): Jeg skal ikke til at tegne en skov som individuelle træer det er direkte dumt.
kortgodt (2024-02-23 13:42:25+00:00): Bare lige for at ridse op betyder Lund mindre skov jf. https://denstoredanske.lex.dk/-lund
BR_pebble (2024-07-18 07:59:03+00:00): Hello chacha74
Thank you for mapping!
Way id 1268617689 was not connected so I added the missing connection.
Please inspect your task carefully before closing.
Happy Mapping!
JavierSp (2024-02-27 18:59:49+00:00): Hola!  A la subestación eléctrica de la casa de campo le has añadido la palabra ¿correalon? ¿qué es eso?

Subestación Eléctrica Correalon de la Casa de Campo
HellMap (2024-02-23 12:39:02+00:00): Sveiki!

Zīmējot laukumus kā https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1042055081 jāņem vērā, ka pie tiem pievienotus ceļus nevajadzētu atstāt tikai līdz robežai, jo tad maršrutēšana vairs pareizi nestrādās. Pašiem ceļiem ir jābūt arī savstarpēji savienotiem, lai tie pareizi maršrutētu no viena uz otri, jo laukums apzīmē fiziskas dimensijas, bet ne loģiskos savienojumus.

Vēl pievērsīšu uzmanību, ka šis drošvien nav `place=square`, bet drīzāk  neliels laukumiņš gājēju atpūtai https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=pedestrian ?

Es šeit no ortofoto pielaboju, cerams, ka pareizi.

Paldies
richlv (2024-02-23 20:26:57+00:00): Kā arī varbūt ir vēlme apspriest šādas tēmas OSM Latvijas kopienas čatā :)

https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com
cuzi (2024-03-04 11:44:49+00:00): Looks ok to me! 
If you know that a building is commercial, you can also use the more specific "building=commercial" or "building=industrial" instead of just "building=yes"
MorahT (2024-02-23 14:58:53+00:00): 
1) These changes have removed the lake from OSM as they are not correctly tagged.

2) These changes have removed the wooded island from the eastern side.

3) These changes have removed the wooded island and sandbar island from the western side.

4) While the eastern side is the trout lake and the western side is the carp lake, they are both Horseshoe Lake (Lake 3) from before the land bridge was added through the middle.

https://www.littlehorseshoelake.com/
MorahT (2024-02-23 15:15:40+00:00): I obviously mixed up east and west when editing the above comment.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-04-23 21:40:11+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/648603705 is not a hotel
MorahT (2024-02-23 14:59:10+00:00): 
1) These changes have removed the lake from OSM as they are not correctly tagged.

2) These changes have removed the wooded island from the eastern side.

3) These changes have removed the wooded island and sandbar island from the western side.

4) While the eastern side is the trout lake and the western side is the carp lake, they are both Horseshoe Lake (Lake 3) from before the land bridge was added through the middle.

https://www.littlehorseshoelake.com/
MorahT (2024-02-23 15:15:46+00:00): I obviously mixed up east and west when editing the above comment.
Cebderby (2024-02-24 15:46:14+00:00): Changesets 147808414 and 147808706 reverted as badly damaging the map, with no indication of what, if anything, was the intent of the change.
aTarom (2024-02-23 14:41:19+00:00): Muy buenas, me puede indicar su fuente , por ejemplo, del name:de?
"name:de"="Basilika der Heiligen Maria"
ni la wikipedia en DE lo "traduce"
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bas%C3%ADlica_de_Santa_Maria_(Castell%C3%B3_d%E2%80%99Emp%C3%BAries)

Está utilizando un traductor automático?
AmyCupcake (2024-02-23 15:33:15+00:00): None of these names appear on the website for the Basilica, it is extremely absurd to request that people do not vandalise your changeset that very much seems itself to be vandalism. https://www.basilicasantamaria.com/
user_177389 (2024-02-23 14:54:47+00:00): Hi aleno150,

please make sure that (even when cutting and automatically creating relations) the coastline tag belongs to the lines and not to the relations. Coastline is a special case and iD are just too stupid for that.

Best regards,
Mario
aleno150 (2024-02-23 16:16:40+00:00): Hi Mario,
Sorry I don't fully understand how to take care of coastline tag, please teach me. I'm only able to use iD and doesn't like to duplicate lines, is that my only option to create a second line offset? I'm done editing these islands, I did notice you did an update. Thanks. Any more of my edits needing an update?
user_177389 (2024-02-23 16:52:40+00:00): An example: There is a closed ring with natural=coastline and place=island. In order to draw a forest as a partial area, you have to divide the ring. Shorter lines and a new multipolygon with natural=coastline and place=island are now created. The coastline tag must stay on the lines and only place=island and type=multipolygon belong on the multipolygon.

natural=coastline -> line
the description of the island -> multipolygon

You did everything right except for the tags, unfortunately they are all attached to the multipolygon. It happened several times over the last few days. I've already corrected that.
Metzor (2024-02-23 19:45:55+00:00): Hallo Fabian!

Deine Beschreibung des Änderungssatzes war diesmal sehr hilfreich und informativ. Super!

Es war noch ein Tippfehler im Namens-tag der Bäckerei. Beim Format der Öffnungszeit hast du die Semikolons vergessen.

Ich habe es hiermit korrigiert:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147832071

Viele Grüße
Metzor
Fabian007 (2024-02-23 19:54:33+00:00): Hallo Metzor,

Vielen Dank für deine Nachricht!

Oh, sorry, wegen den rechtschreibfehler von mir, und sorry, das ich erst zu spät schreibe!

Was ist den eigendlich Semikolons
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147810548
Fabian007 (2024-02-23 19:57:06+00:00): Hallo Metzor,

Vielen Dank für deine Nachricht,  sorry, das ich eher leider den Satz nicht zu Ende geschrieben habe, und sorry, das ich zu Spät antworte.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147810548
Fabian007 (2024-02-23 20:01:48+00:00): Hallo Metzor,

Vielen Dank, für deine Nachricht, sorry das ich zum Dritten Mal schreibe wegen meinen unvollständig Nachricht, Sorry das ich zu Spät zurückschreibe, und Sorry, wegen meinen Tippfehler von mir!

Was bedeutet eigendlich Semikolons, wen ich dich fragen darf?

Danke, und einen schönen Abend dir noch!

MFG Fabianbuecheler
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147810548
Fabian007 (2024-02-23 20:04:27+00:00): Hallo Metzor,

Vielen Dank, für deine Nachricht, sorry das ich zum Vierten Mal an dir schreibe wegen meinen unvollständige Nachricht, Sorry das ich zu Spät zurückschreibe, und Sorry, wegen meinen Tippfehler von mir!

Was bedeutet eigendlich Semikolons, wen ich dich fragen darf?

Danke, und einen schönen Abend dir noch!

MFG Fabianbuecheler
Metzor (2024-02-23 20:21:22+00:00): Hallo Fabian,

Kein Problem. Wieso zu spät? Hier gibt es kein zu spät. Ist doch alles freiwillig.

Zum Semikolon kannst du hier nachlesen:
https://de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semikolon

Du hattest geschriebn:
opening_hours=Mo-Fr 06:00-18:00 Sa 06:30-13:00 Su 07:00-12:00

Richtig ist:
opening_hours=Mo-Fr 06:00-18:00; Sa 06:30-13:00; Su 07:00-12:00

Schönen Abend
Metzor
Fabian007 (2024-02-23 20:32:07+00:00): Hallo Metzor,

Vielen Dank, für deine Nachricht!

Den Link werde ich es mal in Ruhe mal durchlesen, soballd ich mehr Zeit habe.

Aber danke nochmals für das verbessern der Öffnungszeiten in den Meiterbäckerei Schneckenburger!

Ich wünsche dir einen schönen Abend noch!

MFG Fabianbuecheler
Frans S (2024-02-23 18:20:02+00:00): Hello Péter.
I Reviewed this task (changeset)
A few remarks.  The objects you mapped as a ruin are often a cattle yard. Open space with a fence around it. Sometimes next to a small building. 
There are also several round buildings to map
Take a look at this picture.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1PJMTFwKrYrcrSC9mn31GuysS_4YhcQ0R/view?usp=drive_link

P;ease do not connect nodes of roads to other features like landuse area.
See the wiki Highway Africa when to tag a trace as 'track' minor roads inbetween a settlement are most to be mapped as 'path' or when it is wide and connect parts to each other as 'unclassified' Residential is more for urban places.
Best regards
Péter Elekes (2024-02-25 04:59:08+00:00): Hi Frans, thanks for validating and spending so much attention on these edits! I'm pretty confident they are indeed ruins, please have a look at how the same area looks like on the most detailed Airbus imagery from 6/29/2023 (I've annotated the same buildings): https://prnt.sc/aOzYg9aVJCOR
Link on Google Maps: https://www.google.com/maps/place/17%C2%B002'04.7%22S+35%C2%B013'27.2%22E/@-17.0347724,35.2234349,184m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m4!3m3!8m2!3d-17.03463!4d35.22423?entry=ttu

I wouldn't rule out the possibility that some of these ruins have been reused for accomodating animals, but they are primarily ruins I believe. Someone would need to confirm this on the ground.
On other areas I've seen these buildings as fresh ruins on Bing, then on later imagery from ESRI they have been overgrown by vegetation. On rare occasions I even saw half of the damaged roof present. Remember, we're mapping a cyclone-struck area with buildings having light roofs that winds can easily take away.

All in all I'd revert your deletions and leave them as ruins, but I'm open to further discussion. 

Thanks for the remark on not connecting roads to area features, note taken.

Best, Peter
Frans S (2024-02-25 09:15:08+00:00): Hello. Peter.
Thanks for the imageries. Yes, you are right. These images are so clear. I hope there comes a time that all our imageries are of this quality.
Best regards
Pieter Vander Vennet (2024-11-03 17:49:59+00:00): Hooray! Thanks for retagging those, lets do away with `memorial:type`

BTW: some people used `memorial:text` instead of inscription, `memorial:addr` and `name` instead of `subject`. It might be nice to retag those as well.
geozeisig (2024-11-04 09:48:37+00:00): Thank you for the flowers. You are right `memorial:text` and `memorial:addr` should also be corrected. The wiki page stolperstein also supports this. I'm currently on the next but one topic, so feel free to change it.
okadatsuneo (2024-02-26 01:07:32+00:00): place=cityのタグは市名を表示するのに必要ですので、変えないで下さい。
市役所としては別にタグ付けされています。
Hufkratzer (2024-02-23 21:57:46+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1253951029 is not a riding centre (leisure=horse_riding); it is an outdoor riding arena like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1026068321. In OSM riding arenas should be tagged leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian and iD has a preset for riding arenas that does that.
Compare https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dhorse_riding
LeoBardonaro (2024-02-26 07:52:17+00:00): Hey Friend, thanks, I updated it. :)
Syl (2025-02-19 23:13:16+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai annulé la suppression du point géodésique et du clocher, même si ils sont au même endroit il n'y a pas besoin de les fusionner.
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-08 18:34:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 148396825 where the changeset comment is: weitere leidige edits unerwünschter Sockenpuppen entfernt s. https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Global_ban_of_user_geocodec
eggie (2024-02-23 17:59:16+00:00): Dag Brw 

Beter een terugmelding doen richting Kadaster als iets niet meer klopt.
Anders ook kans dat de oude vorm weer terugkomt in OSM (periodieke updates)
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/?searchQuery=Enschedesestraat+131&objectId=0173100000141273&theme=BRT+Achtergrond&geometry.x=260366.22&geometry.y=480188.24950000003&zoomlevel=15&bijbehorendeAdressen=Pand

MVG
eggie
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-08 18:34:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 148396825 where the changeset comment is: weitere leidige edits unerwünschter Sockenpuppen entfernt s. https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Global_ban_of_user_geocodec
NorthCrab_upload (2024-02-23 13:40:19+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11649130976

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
tordans (2024-02-24 07:47:55+00:00): Hallo! Müssten die Materialien nicht mit Semikolon und ohne Leerzeichen getrennt werden?
shhh (2024-02-25 00:05:27+00:00): Hallo, danke für den Hinweis. Ich habe es geändert. Schöne Grüße
Bexhill-OSM (2024-02-24 16:55:30+00:00): Feel free to remove the wikidata tag before editing then add it back before uploading.
I would also re-add the natural=wood tag.
Other useful tags you could use are:
boundary=protected_area
protect_class=4
protection_title=Site of Special Scientific Interest

Hope that helps!
Alex
flohoff (2024-02-23 16:21:53+00:00): Moin,
ist das richtig das die L364n hier am südlichen anschluss "onway" ist? Dein changeset kommentar hat da nicht so drauf hingewiesen das das so eine weitreichende änderung ist.

Flo
aixbrick (2024-02-23 20:34:49+00:00): Hi,
ja, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2631141 (hätte ich zusätzlich drauf verlinken sollen). Diese Kuriosität (keine Einfahrt aus Richtung Geilenkirchen) ist auch in Mapillary sicht- und auf den vDOP erkennbar.
Gruß
flohoff (2024-02-24 10:48:57+00:00): Ah cool - Ich hab nur die routingänderung in der Routenüberwachung gesehen und fand das seltsam auf Landstraßen oneways zu haben ;) Scheint aber ja ein größeres Bauvorhaben zu sein.

Flo
aixbrick (2024-02-24 15:50:54+00:00): Ich vermute, dass sich die Situation erst nach dem Bau der Brücke, Rückbau der Bahnübergänge und Teilrückbau der alten L364 ändern wird. Das soll dann irgendwann mal so aussehen: https://fragdenstaat.de/anfrage/radwegeplanung-am-bauprojekt-l364n-beseitigung-des-bahnuberganges-in-geilenkirchen-suggerath/574708/anhang/L.PDF.
kapazao (2024-09-19 18:40:04+00:00): Hola, ¿communication=line en una línea eléctrica? (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/129696828)
Antonio Eugenio Burriel (2024-09-20 14:09:37+00:00): Hola Kapazao,

sí, Red Eléctrica es operador de telecomunicaciones y tiene una de las mayores redes de fibra óptica en España que discurren a lo largo de la infraestructura eléctrica.
https://numeracionyoperadores.cnmc.es/

Las líneas  eléctricas marcadas con communication=line, cuya etiqueta veo has eliminado,  incluyen troncal de fibra óptica.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:communication%3Dline
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:power%3Dcable

Te ruego que rectifiques el etiquetado que has eliminado.
kapazao (2024-09-20 15:26:28+00:00): Hola, power=line es una línea eléctrica y communication=line es una línea de comunicaciones, como bien se comenta en las mismas páginas que indicas, por lo que su etiquetado no se debe unir, son elementos distintos.
Si debajo de una calle pasa un cable, no etiqueto la calle con los atributos del cable, sino que edito el cable a parte, pues esto igual.
Así estamos generando conflictos de etiquetado y a la hora de consultar datos tendremos información que no corresponde a cada elemento.
Espero que lo entiendas y disculpa por eliminar sin comentar que tengo pendiente la revisión de cómo etiquetar estos elementos que van por el mismo lugar, ya que no lo he visto anteriormente. Normalmente se haría una relación entiendo, ya que tampoco se deberían crear líneas superpuestas, pero tengo que verlo bien.
Un saludo
Antonio Eugenio Burriel (2024-09-21 08:27:58+00:00): Kapazao, esto no es igual al ejemplo que citas.
Estamos hablando de mazos de conductores suspendidos entre las mismas torres. No tiene nada que ver con un cable enterrado debajo de una calle.
Añadir que JOSM contempla esta dualidad energía-comunicaciones y el validador no alerta.

De todas formas, aquí hay dos cuestiones:

La primera, que has eliminado etiquetas que describen correctamente una realidad, en este caso una serie de tendidos de fibra óptica que han desaparecido del mapa.
"Don't remove tags that you don't understand"
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice

Y lo ha hecho en un conjunto de cambios con un alcance geográfico enorme, mezclando cambios que no tienen nada que ver, lo que a su vez dificulta resolverlo:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits

Tienes que resolver esto primero.

La segunda cuestión versa sobre la idoneidad de incluir en un mismo vector información relativa a dos objetos físicos que discurren completamente solapadas en todo su recorrido, esto es, conducción eléctrica sobre conducción de comunicaciones.

Coincido en que no se deben añadir vectores superpuestos y que usar relaciones evita este problema, pero la realidad actual es que en el resto del mundo se están solapando las etiquetas de energía y comunicaciones cuando los conductores discurren exactamente sobre los mismos soportes.

Si crees que es mejor usar relaciones. adelante, pero no borres lo que no te gusta o no entiendes.