piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
trigpoint (2023-08-03 12:43:00+00:00): Hi
This edit is incorrect. This is a circular one way road, not a roundabout.

The roads joining have standard give way markings, not roundabout entry markings.

It was correctly mapped before and needs to be reverted.

Cheers Phil
vtrtsxlegend (2023-08-07 11:34:27+00:00): Hi Phil, Thank you for the feedback and explanation.  Could this be defined as a traffic circle?  Cheers.  Chris
trigpoint (2023-08-07 11:42:08+00:00): It cannot be defined as a traffic circle. It is just a one way road.

Cheers Phil
trigpoint (2023-08-07 11:51:34+00:00): Apart from there is no concept of traffic circles in the UK. Junction=circular is used on roundabouts with traffic lights although routers treat them exactly the same as roundabouts.
 Cheers Phil
vtrtsxlegend (2023-08-07 13:48:57+00:00): Thanks Phil.  Good info and advice.  Cheers.  Chris
Leo Slager (2023-08-01 20:46:05+00:00): Hi Ron,
Graag ook nog toevoegen:
public_transport=platform
bus=yes

En is de ref:IFOPT al bekend ?
eggie (2023-08-06 20:40:52+00:00): Hier is net ook een busstop toegevoegd
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139531636
groet
eggie
Leo Slager (2023-08-06 22:13:51+00:00): bushaltes, gegevens aangevuld mbv NDOV haltebestand.
routerelatie bus 101 aangevuld.
aseidel (2023-08-02 09:15:13+00:00): Liebe:r asile111,
bitte bei den Verkehrszeichen auf die richtigen StVO-Nummern achten: z. B. muss es bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11081727766 heißen: 1022-10 (nicht 102210).
Danke und herzliche Grüße
Antje Seidel
#lgmaps
LouisXIV (2024-09-02 13:55:27+00:00): Le commerce "Boulangerie Épicerie Aubriat" est autant une boulangerie qu'une épicerie, pourquoi avoir supprimé le nœud `shop=convenience` ? 
À ma connaissance c'est le meilleur moyen de taguer ce genre de commerce.
jbcharron (2024-09-03 16:03:01+00:00): Les commerces avec deux activités c'est toujours délicat, surtout qu'ils n'en font pas du tout mention sur l'annuaire des entreprises
J'ai recréé un noeud avec shop convenience https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156149196
Une autre solution aurait pu être de faire shop=bakery;convenience
LouisXIV (2024-09-04 00:36:46+00:00): Oui j'aimerais bien utiliser cette solution mais elle est encore trop peu supportée par les applications qui ne verront même plus que c'est une boulangerie.
Sandal man (2024-01-06 10:04:20+00:00): Hola, ¿puedes echarle un vistazo a esto? Creo que cometiste un error.
Olvidaste etiquetar las paredes.
Saludos
mariocebolla (2024-01-06 14:12:09+00:00): Buenas, cierto, no etiqueté las paredes porque tengo pendiente de verificar las características. No tengo claro que todos sean de ladrillos o vallas.
Saludos.
Sandal man (2024-01-06 14:38:48+00:00): Vale, porque ya fue hace 5 meses.
Saludos
trigpoint (2023-08-03 17:07:28+00:00): Again not a roundabout, should be junction=circular as it has traffic lights.

Cheers Phil
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-08-04 19:07:43+00:00): Hi, I clearly see something like a path on aerials. Maybe it was not walkable during the time you visited or it's walkable if you aren't afraid to get your feet wet?
st1TKvTFu2wdIbU6lqCp (2023-08-05 06:41:09+00:00): The other ways in this area are wooden paths and it is prohibited to walk beneith them. The deleted path probibly origins from when the paths were built in the 2010s.
Mapillox (2023-08-12 20:41:51+00:00): thanx
NieWnen (2023-08-13 10:18:33+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3830622
Allison P (2023-08-05 02:58:57+00:00): I think this might be a single building mapped as two.
Glassman (2023-08-04 17:10:45+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139315648
5m4u9 (2023-08-02 05:18:22+00:00): Hi, the gates and streets aren't private, they are open to anyone.

There are occasions when the gates are closed, but these are on certain days (Halloween or the founding date of the neighbourhood)...
(Inactive) hayduke1275 (2023-08-03 14:32:26+00:00): Thank you for bringing this to our attention and updating the data.
confusedbuffalo (2023-08-09 08:24:01+00:00): Be careful not to accept all of the changes all of the time. Here the nursery is under the same code as a number of other schools and so it picked up details from there. I've reverted some of the changes
woodpeck_repair (2023-11-06 23:58:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 143714052, 143714026, 143714035, 143714023 where the changeset comment is: revert von edits eines benutzers nach selbstlöschung
Dakon (2023-08-02 20:53:35+00:00): Just in case someone wonders: error fixed in https://github.com/osm2go/osm2go/commit/c256576b84f3f7c798a52f2466c225a31be31cb9
Tjuro (2023-08-02 21:05:20+00:00): Lol, is it just a coincidence you uploaded this node to the same field as by bot uploads?
https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/changeset/266474
Dakon (2023-08-04 17:04:21+00:00): No, I had an unrelated PEBKAC error downloading things and decided to pick an area where something was added recently. So I ended up exactly here ;)
Tomas09 (2026-04-11 22:54:42+00:00): Try not to glue landuse to roads next time :P
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-08-02 21:33:33+00:00): reverted as undiscussed bot edit, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct

(if this one was still fully and completely reviewed - and each way checked - feel free to apply it again by reverting the revert)
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-08-02 21:32:09+00:00): reverted as undiscussed bot edit, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct
pio2_122 (2023-08-01 20:44:41+00:00): Zmiana wykonana zupełnie na ilość, a nie na jakość: do dwóch budynków, których z jeden został zmieniony na building=university został dodany tylko tag name. OSM to nie gra, w której nabija się wyniki przez liczbę edycji, czy rozwiązanych uwag.

W związku ze świadomym ignorowaniem zasad OSM (w tym komentarzy z uwagami do edycji) zmianę wycofałem w całości.
jacobwhall (2023-08-01 20:16:54+00:00): Link to note:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3728410
ivanbranco (2023-08-01 21:31:05+00:00): Hi Simtwelve, welcome to OSM and thanks for the edits,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1837075469
here operator is "Poste Italiane" but the Poste Italiane wikidata is added as not:operator:wikidata=* value. Why so?
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-08-02 21:31:42+00:00): reverted as undiscussed bot edit, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-08-02 21:30:37+00:00): reverted as undiscussed bot edit, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-08-02 21:29:44+00:00): reverted as undiscussed bot edit, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-08-02 21:29:33+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139365229 - reverted as undiscussed bot edit, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct
Mahdi Nameghi (2023-08-02 04:23:25+00:00): سلام
بر چه مبنایی تمام کوچه ها رو ادیت کردین؟
secondaryhighway (2023-08-02 06:44:59+00:00): سلام، من این کوچه ها را به رسیدنتال تبدیل کردم، کوچه ها تو ایران باید معمولا دسیدتال باشند و بارای کوچه باغ ها نمی شد فرق بزرگی دید، و من این ادیت ها را برای استاندارد کردن ایران انجام دادم.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-08-02 21:28:20+00:00): reverted inhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139365177 as undiscussed bot edit

see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-08-02 21:25:40+00:00): reverted as undiscussed bot edit, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct

(user performed many bad bot edits across world, there is no indication of edit being discussed)
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-08-02 21:24:23+00:00): reverted as undiscussed bot edit, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct 

(user performed many bad bot edits across world, there is no indication of edit being discussed)
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-08-02 21:23:07+00:00): reverted as undiscussed bot edit, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct
InsertUser (2023-08-11 12:48:53+00:00): How big was this roundabout?
vtrtsxlegend (2023-08-15 16:39:45+00:00): Hi InsertUser.  Thank you for raising this with me.   I did not realize that I had covered multiple continents (let alone countries) in this changeset.  I am being more aware now to not create a changeset beyond reasonable boundaries.  Regards
Mahdi Nameghi (2023-08-02 06:33:05+00:00): Why are you changing this tag all the time? Do you know all of them?
secondaryhighway (2023-08-02 06:45:03+00:00): سلام، من این کوچه ها را به رسیدنتال تبدیل کردم، کوچه ها تو ایران باید معمولا دسیدتال باشند و بارای کوچه باغ ها نمی شد فرق بزرگی دید، و من این ادیت ها را برای استاندارد کردن ایران انجام دادم.
Mahdi Nameghi (2023-08-02 07:11:25+00:00): شما به کل ایران مسلط هستید که همینجوری دیمی اینهمه ادیت انجام دادین؟
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-08-02 21:21:19+00:00): reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139365051 as undiscussed bot edit, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct

in addition, note that service=* may be applicable also on non-service roads (highway=living_street service=driveway for an example)

Also, in some cases proper fix would be to set way to highway=service, not removal of service tag
jacobwhall (2023-08-01 20:33:16+00:00): Links to referenced notes:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3806004
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3806005
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3806006
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3806007
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-08-02 21:20:41+00:00): reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139365011 as undiscussed bot edit, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct

in addition, note that service=* may be applicable also on non-service roads (highway=living_street service=driveway for an example)

Also, in some cases proper fix would be to set way to highway=service, not removal of service tag
jacobwhall (2023-08-01 20:38:42+00:00): Addresses note #3806008

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3806008
NorthCrab_upload (2023-08-01 20:40:19+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11081882122

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
LockOnGuy (2023-08-06 23:59:24+00:00): Why did you change the names? You even changed the name:ar to Kurdish which is wrong! I will fix this, please do not remove Arabic names like this. Regards.
audtr (2023-08-02 18:50:17+00:00): Noch als kleine Anregung: Mit Ortskenn tnis würde es sich anbieten, die Eingänge direkt als Knoten mit entrance=yes auf dem Gebäudeumriss zu legen.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:entrance
audtr (2023-08-02 19:01:04+00:00): (den)
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-08-02 21:17:16+00:00): reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139364949 as an unduscussed bot edit

see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct

also, there are highway=path with speed limits
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-08-02 21:17:00+00:00): reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139364949 as an unduscussed bot edit

see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct

also, there are highway=pedestrian with speed limits
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-08-02 21:17:11+00:00): reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139364949 as an unduscussed bot edit

see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct

also, there are highway=footway with speed limits
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-08-02 21:16:57+00:00): reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139364949 as an unduscussed bot edit

see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct

also, there are highway=pedestrian with speed limits
bxl-forever (2023-08-01 21:14:13+00:00): Hello,

I am not sure your data sources are up to date.  Also, mapping an area without local knowlewge, without looking at existing tags or without asking locals first is a terrible idea.

Here is an example of a former roundabout in my area:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/22971968

The last changeset has a very clear title.  We wrote this:

Square Amnesty International/Amnesty Internationalplein - new traffic scheme, no longer a roundabout but cut into multiple parts, some of them in both directions, some entirely closed to motor vehicles 

We put "was:junction=roundabout" to alert armchair mappers that it *was* a roundabout but is no longer one.

All this careful work is damaged when you arbitrarily restore the tags, presumably on outdated imagery.  I am afraid I’ll have to revert your change.
vtrtsxlegend (2023-08-02 11:27:03+00:00): Hi bxl-forever, Thank you for bringing this to my attention and for the feedback,. My apologies for my inappropriate edit and than k you for reverting my changes to make this correct again. I have learnt some valuable information and will take more care going forward to ensure that I look at the history first.  Thanks again.
vtrtsxlegend (2023-08-02 11:36:49+00:00): Hi again bxl-forever,  Do you want me to revert the edits and restore or will you be doing so which is what I think I understood from your message?  Thanks
bxl-forever (2023-08-03 00:19:30+00:00): Thanks for the answer.  Don’t worry, those things happen.
I’ve just restored the ways, it’s done.
Have a nice day.
vtrtsxlegend (2023-08-03 16:08:39+00:00): Thank you
mueschel (2023-08-11 08:36:15+00:00): Hallo,
du hast an Busbahnhöfen sehr viele "operator" Tags eingetragen. In dieses Tag sollte eigentlich nur der Betreiber des Bahnhofs selber eingetragen werden, nicht die Betreiber der Linien die dort halten. 
z.B. Flixbus wird sich sicher nicht um Reparaturen am Erlanger Busbahnhof kümmern.
Buffty (2023-09-10 21:10:51+00:00): Hallo mueschel,
entschuldige bitte die späte Reaktion, ich habe erst jetzt die Zeit gefunden, mich mit deinem Kommentar ausführlich zu befassen.
Du hast natürlich recht, dass sich Flixbus "sicher nicht um Reparaturen am Erlanger Busbahnhof kümmern" würde. Erst durch deinen Kommentar ist mir aufgefallen, dass im Wiki zumindest unter https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:public_transport=stop_area und unter https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:public_transport=stop_position bei "operator" ausdrücklich "Nicht das nutzende Verkehrsunternehmen." steht.
Auf anderen Seiten steht dort "Name des Betreibers" (3x auf https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway=bus_stop), "Name der Firma, die die Plattform betreibt." (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:public_transport%3Dplatform) oder "Name der Gesellschaft, welche die Station betreibt" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:public%20transport=station), was meiner Meinung nach alles Spielraum für Interpretation lässt. In Verbindung damit, dass bei den meisten Haltestellen, die mir bisher untergekommen waren, "operator=EStW" [sic!] angegeben war (siehe https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1A6A), ging ich am Anfang davon aus, dass damit das jeweilige Verkehrsunternehmen gemeint ist - im Erlanger Umland findet sich nämlich auch "Vogel" oder "OVF".
Dazu muss man wissen, dass (zumindest in Bayern) die Landkreise und die Kreisfreien Städte für den ÖPNV zuständig sind und somit auch für die (An-)Lage der Bushaltestellen - somit wären diese die jeweilige Betreiberin einer Bushaltestelle bzw. eines -bahnhofs. In Erlangen werden Haltestellen von der Stadt gebaut und gewartet (inklusive Winterdienst), an lukraktiven Haltestellen stellt aufgrund eines Vertrags ein Werbeunternehmen (Deutsche Städtereklame?) die Wartehäuschen auf - und nur bei den restlichen Haltestellen stellen die Stadtwerke auf jeweils konkreten Auftrag der Stadt ein Wartehäuschen hin. Meiner Meinung nach war dann schon "operator=EStW" falsch, ich habe diesen Fehler "nur" fortgesetzt.
Was machen wir? "operator" bei allen Haltestellen löschen oder mit "Stadt Erlangen" befüllen?
vg, Buffty
mueschel (2023-09-11 17:07:01+00:00): Eine definitive Antwort kann ich dir da auch nicht geben. Allerdings muss der operator ja nicht unbedingt der Auftraggeber / Geldgeber sein. Deswegen würde ich die Stadtwerke da als nicht unbedingt falsch ansehen. 
Diese Konstrukte können ja unter Umständen noch viel verworrener werden.
Man sollte es nur nach Möglichkeit einheitlich im Stadtgebiet machen.
Xvtn (2023-08-02 14:44:02+00:00): Looks good to me. IIRC the general rule is that separate ways are only valid when there's physical separation (grass, concrete barrier, etc.) but there are exceptions like parking aisles and stuff. I'd say everything there looks reasonable.
Violaine_Do (2024-11-26 00:37:14+00:00): bonjour et merci pour tes contributions, la convention OSM pour les noms c'est d'éviter les majuscules, j'ai corrigé ça. Merci et bon mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139318845
5m4u9 (2023-08-02 05:27:20+00:00): Hi, this gate & road is only private for cars and motorcycle... I use (bicycle & pedestrian) when are open (maybe 06:00-18:00).
5m4u9 (2023-08-02 05:27:42+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9339331182
Pegasus21 (2023-08-02 12:54:46+00:00): Good morning 5m4u6, 
Due to your local knowledge, I added bicycle=yes and foot=yes to the gate and way of Calle San Javier. 
Pegasus21
Jakka (2023-08-02 07:07:21+00:00): een landuse kan nooit een bed and breakfast zijn ???
even dit bekijken
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dguest_house
MxxCon (2023-08-02 02:58:32+00:00): This shape seems...questionable?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139319304
daniel_solow (2023-08-02 14:45:44+00:00): It was a place maker from when I was passing through. The current imagery does not reflect the construction extent
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139319304
mueschel (2023-08-04 09:21:52+00:00): Hi,
can we remove the foreign tags on this node? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11063390739
flother (2023-08-04 11:04:35+00:00): Ah, thanks for pointing them out. Removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139436312
EllieNyaa (2023-09-11 02:40:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 141087813.
lromberg (2024-10-06 15:40:59+00:00): Alltså, vad är det för märklig taggning av 163707705? vehicle=no på en cykelväg?  Och varför svarar du craxgard aldrig på meddelanden?
NorthCrab_upload (2023-08-01 22:30:19+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2186660744
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/895832989

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
CurlingMan13 (2023-08-02 01:47:17+00:00): If it is closed, it shouldn't be deleted.  It should just have access tags updated to access=no.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139320525
James20PR (2023-08-03 16:44:07+00:00): Thank you for your comment. Wouldn't a problem with the access tag as no, people will still try and drive it as showing a road?  The satellite image is so old it does not show current on the ground conditions as closed physically by USFS.  And even that won't show on USFS maps.  The US Forest Service GIS data does show it as not existing. But if access tag as no is the best way, then OK.  Thanks again.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139320525
CurlingMan13 (2023-08-02 01:47:31+00:00): If it is closed, it shouldn't be deleted.  It should just have access tags updated to access=no.  I can still see it in aerial imagery.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139320537
James20PR (2023-08-03 16:46:49+00:00): Thansk again.  Satelittee imagery is old and will show what appears to be a road. It is just an old cut in the timber and is not any kind of road or trail, and today it would be very hard to walk. And it is not a US Forest Service designated road.  I live in this area is why my knowledge is high on the routes in the area.  I contend it should be closed as it doesn't exist.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139320537
CurlingMan13 (2023-08-03 16:57:17+00:00): So access tags should be used.  It would prevent someone from inadvertently readding it, despite it being "closed"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139320537
James20PR (2023-08-03 17:19:01+00:00): Thank you for the explanation.  Learning more about the system and this certainly helps!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139320537
chris14679 (2025-06-26 02:48:04+00:00): This change set has used an old, out of date aerial photo and has put things into the wrong locations. The moorings in the river were replaced about 2016 and some were removed. This changeset puts back the moorings which were removed in 2016 and reverts others to their old locations which are not correct. This whole changeset needs to be reverted.
chris14679 (2025-06-26 02:56:12+00:00): ... and if you made any other edits to Kerikeri inlet area based on old aerial photos then please could you revert them all, we put a lot of work into creating accurate, detailed and current openseamap data for kerikeri based on local knowledge and recent aerial photos only to see it being changed to reflect a very old historic aerial photo. People rely on this data to navigate the river on boats as there is no other accurate nautical chart of Kerikeri.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-12-19 15:49:28+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145297452
jcr83 (2023-08-02 13:35:20+00:00): Bonjour,
Vous venez de modifier des rues d'Auvare, donc je pense que vous venez d'y faire une petite visite.  Vous avez mis "footway" à la place de "path" dans tous le village. Les rues sont-elles marquées comme réservées aux piétons ? Sont-elles interdites aux vélos par des panneaux ? Sinon, il faut laisser "path" (chemin non carrossable).
Ptigrouick (2023-08-27 17:05:09+00:00): Bonjour,
La distinction path/footway est assez délicate. En tout cas footway ne signifie pas que la voie est interdite au vélos. La preuve la page du wiki qui précise que l'on peut utiliser bicycle=yes en complément de footway. La pratique généralement admise en France est d'indiquer les sentiers hors agglomération non aménagés avec path, et les chemins aménagés en zone urbaine et indiqués comme piétons et/ou cyclables plutôt en footway. Dans le cas d'Auvare le footway me semble donc plus adapté. J'ai détecté le problème à partir d'un signalement Osmose qui indiquait qu'aucune voie mineure (en dessous de tertiary) n'était présente sur cette commune.
jcr83 (2023-08-28 05:20:18+00:00): Bonjour,
D'après le wiki : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions , les footways sont par défaut interdits aux vélos (voir le tableau pour la France).
De plus, toujours d'après le wiki :  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dfootway , footway implique designated, c'est-à-dire un panneau indiquant que c'est pour les piétons.
Dans le cas présent, footway n'est donc pas du tout adapté.
Cordialement