piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
balint36 (2023-12-29 11:09:27+00:00): Van jobb ötletem.
Szerintem az elvárható, hogy mindenki nézze meg, hogy az elvégzendő módosítás helyes-e egyáltalán. Vagy hogy korábban miért is csinálták úgy, és indokolt-e attól eltérni.
Gondold csak végig.
Most te a korábbi #73121 számú, Tokodi elágazás-Almásfüzitő viszonylatot kissé önkényes módon átalakítottad Esztergom-Almásfüzitő viszonylattá. Az OSM-en kívül csomó helyen van hivatkozás az OSM-kapcsolatokra, a Wikidatába is töltögetjük a vasútvonalakhoz a megfelelő kapcsolatot. Most te az egyik kapcsolatot teljesen átpakoltad, így a korábbi összekötések sérülhetnek.
De ugyanígy nem gondoltad át a 16-os vonal átcímkézését sem. A kapcsolatban ott virít a mai napig, hogy a kapcsolatra a forrás a VPE. A VPE ezen adatai nyílt hozzáférhetésűek, így mindenki számára látható, hogy oda az van írva, hogy Hegyeshalomtól Porpácig tart. Ehhez képest te szemrebbenés nélkül átírtad Porpácot Szombathelyre, ami ügye ellent mond a hivatkozott forrásnak. Augusztusban megígérted a javítását, de azóta arra se szagoltál. Most már nem is kell, mert októberben megcsináltam helyetted, miközben kijavíttattam azt a hibát is, hogy a szerkesztő helytelenül felajánlja a "GYSEV"->"GySEV" cseréket.
Csak kis odafigyelésre van szükség...
user_5359 (2023-08-08 06:51:32+00:00): Hello! Please take a look on https://www.osm.org/node/1484203979/history. Are you sure that all the payment methods mentioned (including misspellings) are actually offered? Alarm bells should go off at the latest with the Japanese payment method. If this is an interpretation of Every Door, I recommend an error message.
citrula (2023-08-10 03:34:14+00:00): Hello Patrickp86, I have reverted your edits due to severe data quality issues with your edits. Please note that your edits are making changes for everyone who uses the map! If you'd like to learn more about contributing properly, please check out the guide here: https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/ as well as the OpenStreetMap wiki!

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139685356
aharvey (2024-09-21 23:57:12+00:00): hi you've extended the school zone much wider than what I can see on the ground, you've mentioned you've based this on a survey and local knowledge, but are you sure there was signage at all the entrance points where you start the school zone from?
shashp (2024-09-22 00:03:27+00:00): I applied the updates based on what a local user provided. I do not live there to observe it personally. If you know better you can update it as this change was made 1 year ago. Good luck have fun!
aharvey (2024-09-22 23:57:13+00:00): Thanks for the reply, I've tweaked it to align with what I can see.
Snusmumriken (2023-08-08 06:27:04+00:00): Hej

En kommentar gällande din ändring, samtliga busslinjer och hållplatser inom SL-området är taggade enligt den förenklade PT-modellen och där ingår inte public_transport=platform. Vi vill gärna att taggningen ska vara enhetlig.
Dokumentation https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sweden/Public_transport#F%C3%B6renklad_PT-taggning_f%C3%B6r_bussar
bengtb (2023-08-08 10:35:56+00:00): OK, osmose klagade på att taggarna saknades så jag trodde de behövdes.

Ska jag ta bort min ändringar? Har du gjort nått eller hur är läget med det?

vänligen
    Bengt
Snusmumriken (2023-08-08 12:12:21+00:00): Om du vill ta bort taggen  så vore toppen, annars så kan jag göra det.
bengtb (2023-08-08 12:15:28+00:00): Om inte du redan har gjort så fixar jag själv till mina dumheter!

Tack
SzymonH (2023-08-08 07:18:06+00:00): Dlaczego usunąłeś istniejące tory tramwajowe i drogi? Takie działanie to wandalizm i tworzenie fikcji!
ovruni (2023-08-07 23:48:03+00:00): Hola JSR1781, he notado que en varios de sus conjuntos de cambios se han agregado textos como "xd", "a", los cuales no brindan suficiente información sobre los cambios realizados. Por favor revisa la documentación sobre buenos comentarios en conjuntos de cambios. [0] Si tienes cualquier consulta sobre el mapeo de OSM tenemos el canal de telegram de la comunidad peruana https://t.me/osmpe
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenos_comentarios_en_conjuntos_de_cambios
felipeeugenio (2023-08-08 14:09:51+00:00): Estimado, por favor dedicar un poco mas de tiempo a los trazados, el bosque claramente no tiene esa forma. No hacemos dibujos esquemáticos en OSM.
felipeeugenio (2023-08-08 14:08:25+00:00): Hola. Por favor no pegar los bosques (o cualuier otra area) a los caminos. gracias
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139586739
frosm (2024-09-11 06:37:40+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7557237755
qui a le droit de passer ces poteaux ?
car comment fait-on pour rejoindre l’hôtel https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6168592545 ?
Lisapple (2024-09-14 13:16:22+00:00): Si la situation n'a pas changé depuis l'été dernier (ma dernière visite) et que mes souvenirs sont bons, l'accès en voiture est réglementé (badge sans doute délivré seulement aux résidents). L'accès par bus, vélo et piéton n'est pas affecté.
Ça nécessiterait une vérification sur place.
frosm (2024-09-14 14:31:51+00:00): merci pour le retour
felipeeugenio (2023-08-08 14:06:54+00:00): Hola. El concepto de calle de servicio es para algo totalmente distinto. Por favor no modificar clasificaciones hasta entender un poco como funcionamos como comunidad. Por favor usar el link en mi descripción para acceder al chat.

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139586904
user_5359 (2023-08-08 05:58:56+00:00): Please choose smaller modification areas. Do not add towers if there are already towers (improving the existing ones would be a better approach) and your heights of 0 metres are obviously wrong).
Alexmol (2023-08-12 10:00:10+00:00): Olá.
Que ponto de carregamento é esse da ChargePoint junto às piscinas?
É de acesso público? É pago ?
Que tipo de tomadas tem ?
Obrigado.
Barquinha booster (2023-08-12 15:21:16+00:00): Olá. 

O ponto de carregamento fica embaixo do abrigo solar para carros, a oeste das duas piscinas.

Já vi isso quando subimos lá para passear. Não sei que tipo de conexões tem e se há cobrança. Suponho que foi instalado pelo município. Provavelmente algum funcionário da recepção da piscina pode te informar!

Quase ninguém parece usá-lo. É carregado pelas células solares do protetor solar. Se você tem um carro elétrico por perto, vale a pena conferir!
felipeeugenio (2023-08-08 14:04:25+00:00): Hola
Culvert es para cuando pasa debajo de un camino. SUpongo que no todo ese tramo es un culvert (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tunnel%3Dculvert)

Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139587292
seattlefyi (2023-08-11 04:59:32+00:00): Hi, is this really named "Private Beach"? It seems like more of a description that the access tags already handle.
Javierpf (2023-08-08 19:42:54+00:00): Hello! Thank you for the updates. It seems your changeset crosses many countries. Please retain your changeset smaller. Let reviewers and other mappers could check your edit easier.  it's impossible (almost) to keep track of the database and changes if changes in huge areas.
So I kindly ask you when you edit, retain your changeset in a particular smaller area -such as countries/provinces/municipality- save it first and then move to another area. Examples:
you are adding/modifying 10 objects in 2 distant cities => make 2 changesets, 1 per city.
you are adding/modifying 5 objects in 5 countries => make 5 changesets, 1 per country.
You'll find more information on the reason in this article: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
Loop120 (2023-08-08 19:40:34+00:00): It looks like you turned the Eastern Railway Line into a highway for cars, are you sure that's what you wanted to do? If not I suggest you change the tags back to the way they were before, or revert your changes
Enock4seth (2024-11-28 11:28:04+00:00): This is already 1 year, thanks Loop120 for noticing and you are right. 

Hi khoby419, only add or change features if you are really sure about what you are doing.
adreamy (2023-08-08 02:44:03+00:00): 앞서 적극적으로 지물을 매핑해 주신 것에는 감사를 드립니다만, 실제로 존재하지 않는 지물을 매핑하는 것은 OSM 합의 위반으로 되풀이될 경우에는 '훼손행위'로 간주될 수 있습니다.
옛날에 있었거나 앞으로 있을 것은 매핑하지 않으며 계획이 잡혀 있거나 한 경우에는 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ko:Lifecycle_prefix 에 준해서 표시를 해야 합니다.
더 자세한 것은 텔레그램 사랑방(https://t.me/OSMKorea)이나 공식포럼에서 논의해 주시기 바랍니다.
고맙습니다.
ovruni (2023-08-08 02:11:09+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambios se han agregado edificios con layer ficticios, nodos duplicados con vias, edificios con geometrias extrañas de angulos agudos, por lo que he revertido el conjunto de cambios. Si tienes cualquier consulta sobre el mapeo de OSM tenemos el canal de telegram de la comunidad peruana https://t.me/osmpe
Saludos
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-01 14:00:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 174063813, 174063778, 174063039, 174063675, 174063839, 174063864, 174063733, 174063852, 174063722, 174063049, 174063081, 174063378, 174063746, 174063119, 174063802, 174063878 where the changeset comment is: Following a DWG complaint, reverting a dubious import.  See e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1311170850 https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18848
relaemanila (2023-08-08 02:06:06+00:00): [AS, Quezon City] Correct spelling name to Antoniette.

Sources: ground;street sign
Frans S (2023-08-11 08:36:41+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
 A new mapper !  Welcome. We hope you will enjoy this mapping as well.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings need to be improved to meet the quality standards of HOTOSM.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document for more info)
A: C: Not accurately drawn and squared.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139589794
Fizzie-DWG (2023-12-19 14:09:09+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145293631
Fizzie-DWG (2023-12-19 14:08:14+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145293586
tyfi (2023-08-08 02:58:28+00:00): Also added some natural=tree.
ForestFurnace (2023-08-08 03:01:18+00:00): Park paths may need further realignment as more Strava Heatmap data comes in.
DUGA (2024-03-23 19:54:31+00:00): PennDOT never numbered any town road, using ref:penndot is literally wrong.
user_5359 (2023-08-08 05:51:51+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I remove your SEO SPAM (mostly foreign keys).
Supaplex (2023-08-08 10:44:58+00:00): 為何刪除別人加上去的人行穿越道？
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139590973
这里没有鱼 (2023-08-08 10:30:53+00:00): 不要破坏数据
julcnx (2023-08-08 09:24:31+00:00): Hi djmorkman, I understand one segment connection was wrong but why deleting everything else ? There is clearly a parking within the property: https://www.google.com/maps/@18.8090352,98.9666035,3a,75y,352.93h,69.45t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sk1b4gcslTm1pcdvoA4Vr5g!2e0!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139591518
julcnx (2024-01-09 05:32:30+00:00): Your recent changeset has been reverted due to conflicting edits and a lack of communication. OpenStreetMap thrives on community collaboration. Reach out if you have questions or need help. Let's build better maps together!

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146051884
Syl (2023-09-24 12:22:56+00:00): Hello, you can use the tag man_made=telephone_box https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dtelephone_box
houtari (2023-09-24 18:09:57+00:00): Thanks. I did that and also replaced the node with a polygon ... https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1210597211
这里没有鱼 (2023-08-08 10:30:46+00:00): 不要破坏数据
这里没有鱼 (2023-08-08 10:30:38+00:00): 不要破坏数据
这里没有鱼 (2023-08-08 10:30:32+00:00): 不要破坏数据
Frans S (2023-08-10 14:28:22+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings need to be improved to meet the quality standards of HOTOSM.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document for more info)
A: Not accurately drawn.
G: include the shadow of a building in the mapping.
You often oversize the buildings you mapped. 


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139592505
Frans S (2023-08-10 14:33:35+00:00): Please take a look to this web page, where you can see some adjustments I've made .
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=139710232

Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139592505
map per (2023-08-12 08:36:31+00:00): Hallo mjost,

Touristenattraktion finde ich für das Sendlinger Loch jetzt etwas überbewertet. Ich hab dort noch keine Touristen gesehen.

Viele Grüße
map per
map per (2023-08-22 06:29:16+00:00): Hab tourism=attraction wieder gelöscht
Frans S (2023-08-27 09:31:42+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings need to be improved to meet the quality standards of HOTOSM.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document for more info)
A: E: Inaccurate mapped and / or not squared.
C: Collecting multiple buildings and mapping them as 1 building.
D: Connecting nodes of buildings to other buildings or features like roads and residential areas.
E. Buildings not squared.
F: Mapping of buildings partly hidden by trees.
Mappings are rather oversized.




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139592662
empty_child (2023-08-08 11:28:26+00:00): Hello Alexski52,
Thank you for a contribution. Please, be careful, POI of the city hall in Kutaisi already exists (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1187220922)
Alexski52 (2023-08-08 11:47:19+00:00): Hi,
Thanks for your message.
I will take Care.
I use Maps.me and municipality does not appear on it. Sorry for that.
Have a nice day.
Aldx
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-29 05:14:05+00:00): Hello!

You used
landuse=farma
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16174008/history

Have you maybe meant
landuse=farm
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
woodpeck_repair (2023-11-06 23:56:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 143714006, 143714008 where the changeset comment is: revert von edits eines benutzers nach selbstlöschung
Dodko (2023-08-08 08:35:05+00:00): v opening_hours boli 2 preklepy hodiny musia byť dvojmiestne 09
a poobedný čas má byť oddelený čiarkou a nie ;
mymatej (2023-08-08 08:37:31+00:00): Budem si dávať väčší pozor. Ďakujem.
Dodko (2023-08-08 08:41:55+00:00): Treba používať https://projets.pavie.info/yohours/
prípadne https://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/
streckenkundler (2023-08-08 10:31:55+00:00): Es wäre äußerst Sinnvoll, zugleich auch die Admin-Grenzen mit lagezukorrigieren! Alle dafür benötigten Daten sind verfügbar und nutzbar. Du weißt das, das ich mehrfach bereits geschrieben.  So muß man wieder hinterherputzen!
Larmax (2023-08-08 14:01:54+00:00): Hei, siuntion kirkonkylä ei ole kooltaan niin suuri, että sille sopisi place=town, eikä tarpeeksi erillinen kunnan nykyisestä keskuksesta.
tv0 (2023-08-08 17:04:59+00:00): Selvä, kiitos tiedosta. Onko tuon place=town'in käyttöön ollut jotain yleistä konsensusta? Oman käsitykseni mukaan käytetään nykyisistä (joissain tapauksissa myös entisistä) kunnista/pikkukaupungeista ja/tai kuntakeskuksista erillään olevista taajamista/huomattavista asutuskeskittymistä. Mutta onko tähän jotain virallista lausuntoa antaa?
Larmax (2023-08-09 11:04:33+00:00): OSM:ssä ei oikeastaan ole mitään virallisia lausuntoja, mutta tämä wikiartikkeli on mielestäni hyvä lähtökohta: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:place#Populated_settlements,_urban_and_rural myös foorumilla on käyty keskustelua aiheesta: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mitka-paikat-merkitaan-place-town-suomessa/79379 Lisäksi yleensä, jos kirkonkylä on tarpeeksi iso ollakseen place=town sen nimessä ei ole "kirkonkylää" OSM:ssä eikä MML:n kartoissa.
IngoWo (2023-08-08 17:00:09+00:00): Liebe Nordseezeitung,
ich freue mich ja eigentlich, wenn ihr hier mitmacht, und ihr habt in den letzten paar Wochen ja auch einiges nützliches eingetragen (auch wenn es einige "Anfängerfehler" gab, wie Namen an Fusswegen ohne Eigennamen, fehlende "service=driveway" etc.)

Mir scheint aber, bei den letzten paar Edits ist euch etwas die Sorgfalt verloren gegangen. Bedenkt, dass ihr alleine durch eure Man-Power dafür sorgen könnt, dass die Freizeitmapper hier mit dem Korrigieren von Fehlern nicht mehr hinterherkommen. Gerade deswegen (und weil ihr kommerzielle Interessen habt), kann man von euch eine besondere Sorgfalt erwarten.

Zum konkreten Fall als Beispiel: Hier (und beim benachbarten Changeset) ist nichts neues eingetragen worden (außer Namen an einigen service-Ways?). Stattdessen sind die Wege an eine falsche Position verschoben worden und hat einen falschen Verlauf bekommen (was man auf den Bing-Bildern leicht hätte erkennen können). Dadurch ist einer der Wege unter einem Gebäude gelandet, was den Bearbeiter nicht etwa stutzig gemacht hat, sondern zu einem "layer=-1" geführt hat.

Bitte versucht das nicht zu korrigieren. Ich werde mal versuchen einen Revert zu machen. Das geht einfacher, wenn es in der Zwischenzeit keine Bearbeitungen gab.

Vielleicht werde ich auch noch andere Changesets kommentieren und rückgängig machen, wenn es mir über den Weg läuft.

Bitte versucht doch etwas sorgfältiger zu arbeiten und auch mal genauer ins Wiki oder das Forum zu schauen, um in Zukunft von der Qualität her bessere Edits zu machen. Dann freut sich auch jeder über eure Beiträge

Siehe auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Organised_Editing_Guidelines

und es gibt auch einen Diskussionsfaden im Forum über eure "Namen an Fusswegen"
Gruß, Ingo
Frans S (2023-08-08 13:10:15+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139597068
LudovicG (2025-12-21 11:51:58+00:00): Bonjour,
ARZON n'est pas la "ref" (comup) de la post_box. Avez-vous la possibilité d'y repasser ? D'après l'opendata La Poste (datanova), il s'agirait plutôt de "A1C2Z9".
Tomas Straupis (2023-08-09 06:13:53+00:00): Negerai su multipoligonais. Jei yra du poligonai liečiantys vienas kitą, reikia juos keisti į poligonus, sutvarkyti kraštines ir į didelį išorinį įtraukti tik reikiamas vidinio žiedo kraštines.
DaanLT (2023-08-09 08:55:04+00:00): gerai, ačiū
Tomas Straupis (2023-08-09 09:00:42+00:00): p.s. aš pataisiau, tai gali pažiūrėti, kaip turėjo būti. Na ir klausk, jei ką.
km2bp (2024-11-02 17:19:12+00:00): Przeniosłem utworzony przez ciebie defibrylator. Nie tak daleko bo na drugą ścianę budynku. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11098867523
Marek-M (2024-11-02 19:20:28+00:00): Super! Dzięki :)
Langlaeufer (2023-08-08 12:55:51+00:00): Hallo maramutze
Wenn der Weg als gemeinsamer Rad- und Fußweg (Zeichen DE:240) beschildert ist, dann war highway=path schon das richtige Tagging. anderennfalls fehlt jetzt eine Sperrung für KfZ.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139598008
maramutze2018 (2023-08-08 14:19:36+00:00): Ein Pfad hat max. 1 Meter Breite. Das passt leider weder zum Lönsweg noch zu den anderen Wegen, die ich geändert. Und zweispurige Fahrzeuge waren da auch unterwegs.
Im Wald wird ja auch nicht durchgängig "für Kfz-gesperrt" verwendet.
Langlaeufer (2023-08-08 17:55:11+00:00): Path steht in OSM für mehrzweckweg der nicht von mehrspurigen Fahrzeugen  benutzt werden kann oder darf.  Die Breite spielt dabei keine Rolle. Für gem. Rad und Fußwege wird immer path verwendet. Track wird in der Regel für Wald- und Feldwege verwendet mit freigabe für land- oder forstwirtschaftlichen Verkehr
Hufkratzer (2023-08-08 19:02:31+00:00): Hi,
Regarding https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/854870314, I repeat my comment from https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136401758
arjunaraoc (2023-08-10 00:04:26+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia)
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139598390
jmania (2023-10-16 10:04:37+00:00): there is no such way here
ShenandoahValley (2023-10-17 04:50:12+00:00): Greeting Jmania,
Thank you for making updates to the roads based on your local knowledge. I now see that the residential road I added is an unofficial path. However the service road that was removed appears visible and has cars on it in Esri World imagery. It’s possible that this is a newly constructed road, can you confirm if this is true?
jmania (2023-10-17 05:27:11+00:00): Hi,

This is the passageway that residents of the site use to park their cars. It would be wrong to even consider it as a service road. That's why I removed the path there as well. I live in that neighborhood so you can be sure what I say is true.
ShenandoahValley (2023-10-18 14:31:27+00:00): Thank you for the information, have a nice day!
stefaan1o (2023-09-12 13:00:38+00:00): Wat is de bedoeling van de hondenhofwegel als pad toe te voegen? Is vanaf de Dillaartwijk niet toegankelijk.
Willy De Raaklijn (2023-09-12 13:39:49+00:00): De Raaklijn vervolledigt het Trage Wegenplan voor Sint-niklaas.
Hondenhofwegel is een project voor heropening.
Aan de Kuildamstraat is al een eerste aanzet gegeven, door het plaatsen van een kastanjehouten afsluiting.
In de Dillaertwijk is het de bedoeling daar te starten, of aan te komen, en niet meer in de Heistraat.  Fluvius is daar een van de eigenaars, en is akkoord met de verlegging.   Nu deze nog uitvoeren.  maar dat vraagt tijd.
micheleOSM3 (2023-08-08 11:57:16+00:00): Hello, for the FVG (Friuli Venezia Giulia) there are orthophoto, Lidar and other services that are much more precise and reliable than Bing Maps Aerial and ESRI World. For orthophotos in iD, the personalized string is this: http://irdat-ortofoto.regione.fvg.it/geoserver/ows?FORMAT=image/png&TRANSPARENT=TRUE&VERSION=1.3.0&SERVICE=WMS&REQUEST=GetMap&LAYERS=ortofoto:trueorto_FVG_1720&STYLES=&CRS={proj}&WIDTH={width}&HEIGHT={height}&BBOX={bbox}
In this specific case, your changes have slightly worsened the quality of the mapping. If you need additional information or help, I am at your disposal. Good mapping, Michele.
user_5359 (2023-08-08 09:33:19+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I remove your SEO SPAM entry (mostly foreign keys)