piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mcliquid (2025-02-19 21:47:10+00:00): Thanks! Changes are legit :)
empty_child (2025-02-20 09:32:05+00:00): Hello Temur,
We can't use 2GIS data, it's forbidden resource due to copyright protection. Keep it in mind, otherwise it means full revert of your job and account blocking
Gregory Peony (2025-04-02 03:13:06+00:00): I think that the highway network here may be over extracted; there's not necessarily a need to map all of these highways. I recommend to map highways by starting with those that have clear evidence of usage and are the widest ones like that which pass by the medical facility, then find the best routes which connect the residential areas/settlements you added. Highways should not share nodes with landuse areas. The highway continuity here is not accurate; 1 way should represent 1 highway and not multiple. I recommend downloading and using the apple paint style to help you see this. Using the measurement tool to measure the width of highways is useful in correctly classifying them. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162717710
Glassman (2025-02-20 18:16:33+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162717731
Glassman (2025-02-20 18:16:39+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162717786
Glassman (2025-02-20 18:16:46+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162717833
LuckyNumberS7evin (2025-02-19 21:34:03+00:00): Hallo, willkommen bei OSM.

Dürfen wir den Grund der Löschung von mehreren eingetragenen Adressen wissen?

Danke & Viele Grüße
DD1GJ (2025-02-20 07:55:05+00:00): Revert

Hallo Gemmrigheimer-Dorfflohmarkt, ich vermute, Du willst eine Karte für den Dorfflohmarkt erstellen. Allerdings editierst Du hier direkt in den Rohdaten, welche die Grundlage für alle OSM-Anwendungen sind. Daher habe ich die Löschungen rückgängig gemacht.

Falls Du eine Karte für die temporäre Veranstaltung erstellen willst, dann verwende bitte https://umap.openstreetmap.de/

Mehr zu OSM erfährst Du auch im Tutorial: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Viele Grüße, Joachim
unen (2025-03-05 09:32:24+00:00): Hello Josue, "Antiguo terreno Makro Villa del Río" in your changeset was brought to attention by the Wikidata folks working with OSM data. Is there a reason you have tagged an old shopping mall as a historic pillar? Can there be more proper tags to represent old features instead?
SoyJosueVerde (2025-03-05 19:21:05+00:00): Hi unen! I'm glad you answered me, the place you're talking about is "Former Makro Villa del Río site", the reason why I tagged an old shop as a historical pillar is because the Makro store was moved and demolished and in its place, the Paseo Villa del Rio shopping mall remained. I didn't do it with the intention of vandalism, it's to remember the place where the store was, Greetings!
unen (2025-03-06 09:04:08+00:00): Thank you for the friendly response Josue. No I didn't think it was an act of vandalism because you also put your time into writing a very nice description of Makro Villa del Rio site. But it still would be good to avoid using tags outside of their intended uses. 

The historic tags are generally used to identify features with a historic interest or a significance. And the Former MAkro site was flagged by a close friend from Wikimedia, focusing on historic and heritage features. 

What you might need to do to for Former Makro might be to use life cycle or date tags, and it will be a more proper tagging. 

I'd suggest checking the following articles. Hope you'll find a better way to tag the market. Happy to help, and please give me a message if you need: 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Historic

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Comparison_of_life_cycle_concepts 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:demolished:*

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenHistoricalMap
Carrera075 (2025-02-19 21:44:06+00:00): oops, didn't mean to make this such a large area. This is specifically for the Stephens-Yoshikai school area in northeast Salem
YomanNH (2025-02-24 22:03:02+00:00): Ciągi pieszo-rowerowe mapujemy jako jedną linię, zgodnie z dokumentacją: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Rowery#Drogi_dla_pieszych_i_rower%C3%B3w, o czym bardzo dobrze wiesz. Utworzenie osobnego chodnika i osobnej drogi dla rowerów jest fikcją - nic nie rozdziela tych dwóch ciągów i można swobodnie przemieszczać się między nimi. Kiedy przywrócisz poprzednie zalecane mapowanie jedną linią highway=path?
Yog Sot (2025-02-25 00:25:13+00:00): mapowanie jedną linią nie jest zalecane. Mapowanie dwoma jest kontrowersyjne, można uznać z powodu często niskiego uzasadnienia. Jednakże tutaj uzasadnienie jest  w postaci przejść sugerowanych oraz lokalizacji krawężnika.
YomanNH (2025-02-25 06:16:16+00:00): Możesz mi zacytować fragment dokumentacji, który mówi, że mapowanie jedną linią jest niezalecane? Dla ułatwienia ponownie link do dokumentacji: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Rowery#Drogi_dla_pieszych_i_rower%C3%B3w.

A krawężnik, który jest na poziomie części dla pieszych i części dla rowerów nie jest żadną barierą dzielącą highway=path na dwa osobne byty. Już na forum wkleiłem zdjęcie chodnika z krawężnikiem wzdłuż, który zgodnie z takimi pomysłami powinien być zmapowany jako dwa równoległe chodniki. Dla przypomnienia: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/zniszczenie-mojej-pracy-nad-infrastruktura-rowerowa/125418/83
Yog Sot (2025-02-25 11:54:13+00:00): chodnik nie powinien być rysowany jako dwa osobne chiodniki. brak uzasadnienia ;)
fortera_au (2025-02-19 23:03:21+00:00): Hi, just wondering what your source for this change is, as there isn't one mentioned?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162718448
Fizzie-DWG (2025-03-28 04:24:16+00:00): Reverted by DWG - undiscussed import from unauthorised Source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164190620
b-jazz (2025-02-20 21:19:28+00:00): Instead of adding "surface=grass", you should *replace* "landuse=grass" with "surface=grass". 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#Features_within_a_golf_course
GA_Kevin (2025-02-20 02:39:37+00:00): Thank you so much for this effort! It looks great!
diamondarmorsteve (2025-02-20 02:43:55+00:00): Thanks! None of it would be possible without your mapillary imagery!
GA_Kevin (2025-02-20 02:51:40+00:00): That’s the idea! I have a MR challenge going for that, not sure if you saw one of my messages or the challenge: https://maproulette.org/browse/challenges/51101
dzamper (2025-02-20 07:49:35+00:00): Wycofałem ten zestaw zmian, gdyż może okazać się preciwskuteczny. Ścieżki były poprawnie oznaczone jako takie, po których nie wolno się poruszać. Przed zmianami osoba znająca klucz mapy miała na ten temat jasną informację. Teraz, gdy nie wyświetlają się wcale, taka osoba może pomyśleć, że po prostu nikt jeszcze nie dodał tej ścieżki na mapę, i nie będzie wiedzieć że obowiązuje tam jakiś zakaz.
Rezerwat Segiet (2025-02-23 17:09:30+00:00): OK. Dzięki za wyjaśnienie. Jednak niektórych ścieżek nie ma już w terenie. Zatem proponuję je usunąć, a pozostawić bez zmian te które nadal są widoczne.
Gazer75 (2025-07-15 06:40:39+00:00): Why did you change the access at Trollstigen several months ago? It has been closed until 11. July 2025 due to risk of rock fall.
Please don't change access tags before asking when you don't know the local situation.
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-20 05:47:01+00:00): Hi Jason Nichols, welcome to OSM.

May we know the source of your mapped buildings?

Thanks.
j2nic (2025-02-28 14:58:07+00:00): The imagery was Esri World Imagery. Or are you meaning the names on the buildings?
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-28 15:06:25+00:00): No, I asked about the geometries of the buildings. Were they all digitized manually? Thanks.
dzamper (2025-02-20 07:49:48+00:00): Wycofałem ten zestaw zmian, gdyż może okazać się preciwskuteczny. Ścieżki były poprawnie oznaczone jako takie, po których nie wolno się poruszać. Przed zmianami osoba znająca klucz mapy miała na ten temat jasną informację. Teraz, gdy nie wyświetlają się wcale, taka osoba może pomyśleć, że po prostu nikt jeszcze nie dodał tej ścieżki na mapę, i nie będzie wiedzieć że obowiązuje tam jakiś zakaz.
Rezerwat Segiet (2025-02-23 17:12:53+00:00): OK. Dzięki za wyjaśnienie. Jednak niektórych ścieżek nie ma już w terenie. Zatem proponuję je usunąć, a pozostawić bez zmian te które nadal są widoczne.
Paolo Ghidotti (2025-02-19 22:21:48+00:00): numero civico 35, via orsino a vesio di tremosine
b-jazz (2025-02-20 08:15:58+00:00): FYI, things like cart paths (and most other golf course features) don't have names. To add a "name=Cart Path" tag is incorrect. Just tag it with "golf=cartpath" along with "highway=path" instead.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-02-19 23:18:47+00:00): The name "Avenida Caracas" is already tagged as alt_name. 
If you believe that is wrong please discuss it with the mappers who mapped it that way.
geekbga2024 (2025-02-21 05:48:56+00:00): Hi there, That is wrong, the main name is "Avenida Caracas", as is its original name, it is also how the population know it. In addition, I see that you have deleted my edition of "Autopista Norte" in the Avenida Carrera 45, all of the way is known and its original name is "Autopista Norte", please correct it.
Hidoo00 (2025-04-13 14:56:09+00:00): Hi,
What sources do you have for this changeset? I started investigating these streets since a user reported that routing doesn't work here (https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4672814) and all streets that I've checked are tagged with incorrect access, oneway and bicycle tags.
Hidoo00 (2025-04-13 15:02:47+00:00): After further investigation it looks like some signs on the street are incorrect. Will continue to investigate and correct tagging as I go along...
NorthCrab_upload (2025-02-20 00:31:17+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2604093175
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2604113623
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/353272842
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/353272843

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Nathan_A_RF (2025-03-09 22:31:35+00:00): Hi, please update the maxspeed:type tag to construction if this is a temporary limit
4004 (2025-03-09 23:19:41+00:00): good spot, changed
Nathan_A_RF (2025-03-10 10:46:36+00:00): Cheers
RollTideRoll_asdfjkll (2025-02-21 23:45:12+00:00): Thanks for extending Kinterbish Creek to the Tombigbee River! When I mapped the initial portion in Sumter County the USGS 3D elevation imagery in Choctaw County was very bad but now it seems like its better now! We do have a little group chat in Discord where we coordinate things like the landuse I'm adding to the north of these changesets if you're interested in joining
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-17 00:49:36+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165050253
ma-rt-in (2025-03-27 19:10:33+00:00): Moin,

das Du die Namen der Feuerwehren an die Gebäude mappst ist zwar nett, aber doppelt gemoppelt, da diese bereits an der Fläche sind. Ich entferne das wieder.

Grüße
mariotomo (2025-02-24 06:40:48+00:00): hola y bienvenido a OSM.
si usted es el propietario de la finca o trabaja ahí, quizás pueda ser más específico sobre la función turística del lugar.
en lugar de "tourism=attraction", si por ejemplo ofrece acomodación para la noche, o si ofrece comida, o si produce café?
también podría serle conveniente añadir un número de contacto, o un sitio web.
Sunset_Sakura (2025-02-20 07:55:56+00:00): Your micromapping is beautiful, but comes at the wrong time: they've just been taking the park down. Apparently they're finding a new place for a pop-up park, but anyway this one is not accessible anymore. See: https://shape.nelson.govt.nz/riverside-youth-pop-park
catgirlseraid (2025-02-20 08:11:44+00:00): noo :(
GA_Kevin (2025-02-20 02:28:56+00:00): Thank you for your help in making Lowndes County great on the map! I certainly appreciate your efforts!!
CommanderStorm (2025-02-20 13:39:22+00:00): Jea..
Was really nice to see how rapid works much better in the US compared to europe.
In europe, one has to really search for missing buildings..
kuhni74 (2025-02-20 06:55:45+00:00): merci!
joost schouppe (2025-02-24 14:04:12+00:00): Je hebt hier de verbinding tussen de straten Prins Boudewijnlaan en Kamerrijkbos doen vervallen https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162722591#map=19/50.730788/4.274038
Tussen huisnummer 17 en 19 heb je de percelenkaart een beetje te exact willen volgen, nu zit daar zo'n gekke spie tussen. In de realiteit zijn dat gewoon drie huizen waarvan de tuinen aan elkaar grenzen.
Tom Ameye (2025-02-24 14:22:12+00:00): Met mijn excuses voor het verbreken van de verbinding.
De gekke spie kan ik opvullen met residential garden of bos.
mvg
Tom
Glassman (2025-02-20 02:53:29+00:00): Can you explain why your removed the streams when adding the farmland?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162722664
Udarian (2025-07-13 03:31:32+00:00): I previously asked you why you have moved the node for Hialeah as much as you did and you have not gotten back to me on this in 5 months so I am assuming vandalism in this case, so I am reverting.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168857637
Udarian (2025-02-20 02:59:18+00:00): why did you move the Hialeah node so much it seems to have been placed correctly previously.
also next time please leave a better change set comment, for more info see:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
user_5359 (2025-02-22 11:53:26+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on your modification? What is the mean of the tag 190 = 19054 ?
themanchicken (2025-02-22 14:05:54+00:00): Odd; that is supposed to be `addr:postcode`
BR_pebble (2025-04-24 11:09:18+00:00): Hello FRANCIS NDIRITU, Thank you for contribution!
I have removed the buildings way 1361308096, way 1361310683, way 1361310682 in Esri World Imagery
Make sure to use imagery layer mentioned in project's description. Happy Mapping!
bxl-forever (2025-02-20 09:51:06+00:00): Hello.

For the record, "I added another version" does not provide any useful information in the title.

It turns out this changeset added a translation of Brussels into the Kyrgyz language.  Not sure why you used official_name:ky instead of name:ky.
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-20 05:45:16+00:00): Hi Wanglang11, welcome to OSM.

May we know the reason behind removing some part of the admin boundary here? 

Thanks.
bolli24 (2025-03-08 15:39:59+00:00): In this changeset and some others you inadvertently dragged some nodes very far and caused some issues.
They are now fixed.
Please be more careful in the future.
PoliticalCorrectnessGoneMad (2025-03-08 16:49:25+00:00): @bolli42 Thank you. I saw that, but I didn't know how to fix it. Does OpenStreetMap have an editor's guide I can download as a PDF?
bolli24 (2025-03-08 17:08:46+00:00): You're welcome.
Unfortunately there is no completely comprehensive manual available. But here are come resources that might help you getting more familiar with the browser editor:
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide
https://help.openstreetmap.org/tags/ideditor/?sort=mostvoted
NeisBot (2025-02-20 05:01:05+00:00): Hello, thank you for your contribution!

I noticed that some of the tags and descriptions you've used appear to be related to #SEO #spam. I recommend reading the following page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Spam

Could you please confirm if your map edits here were intentional?

#MapWithoutSpam #TagSmartNotSpam
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-20 05:39:10+00:00): #SEO #spam - Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162725403
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-20 05:39:40+00:00): #SEO #spam - Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162725409
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-20 05:42:21+00:00): #SEO #spam
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-17 00:49:37+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165050253
mavl (2025-05-13 15:08:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
rhtb0 (2025-02-20 06:33:02+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ko:%EB%B3%B4%EC%95%88%EA%B5%AC%EC%97%AD
Fizzie-DWG (2025-03-02 03:57:28+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17343
mavl (2025-05-13 15:07:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
jmarchon (2025-02-21 00:34:47+00:00): Welcome to OSM and thanks for getting this updated!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162724573
NeisBot (2025-02-20 08:37:47+00:00): Hello, thank you for your contribution!

I noticed that some of the tags and descriptions you've used appear to be related to #SEO #spam. I recommend reading the following page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Spam

Could you please confirm if your map edits here were intentional?

#MapWithoutSpam #TagSmartNotSpam
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-21 19:50:23+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162775436
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-20 12:58:48+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162725248
Glassman (2025-02-20 18:18:36+00:00): #TIP: Street names are spelled out in OSM because software has a hard time unabbreviating
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162725524
NeisBot (2025-02-20 08:37:50+00:00): Hello, thank you for your contribution!

I noticed that some of the tags and descriptions you've used appear to be related to #SEO #spam. I recommend reading the following page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Spam

Could you please confirm if your map edits here were intentional?

#MapWithoutSpam #TagSmartNotSpam
NeisRevert (2025-03-13 09:52:40+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/163562032
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-06 03:21:40+00:00): Cleaned up SEO spam tags for Two Men and a Truck POI in changeset 183720957

https://osm.org/changeset/183720957
pavvv (2025-02-20 07:10:22+00:00): Hello, please describe your changesets in English when mapping outside Japan.
Taya_S (2025-02-20 06:41:53+00:00): Reverted SEO vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162726568
Gabrielmaps004 (2025-02-24 20:26:36+00:00): Rua de serviço? o meu Bing Maps não mostra
MountKoussi (2025-02-28 01:40:45+00:00): Hello, thanks for reaching out! Both aerial and ground imagery show a road in-between buildings (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-26.2733243&lng=-48.830483891667&z=19.2552080002972&focus=photo&dateFrom=2022-02-01&pKey=827347004614295). Hopefully that addresses your question!
s777n (2025-02-20 21:09:35+00:00): Здравствуйте. Вы повесили теги моста на всю тропинку. Тем самым вы добаили горомный мост. Вместо этого нужно было разделить тропинку в том месте где мост и повестить теги моста только на сам мост. Исправлено
Marek-M (2025-02-20 08:56:51+00:00): Utworzyłeś tutaj błędną linię przez całą Polskę - https://www.osm.org/way/1361370145
Wykonana przez Ciebie edycja (planowana) jest na tyle mała, że wycofałem ją w całości.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162730770
Marek-M (2025-02-20 09:18:22+00:00): Dodałem już ten wjazd, który miałeś w planie dodać :)
Przemyslaw | Yanosik (2025-02-20 09:28:08+00:00): Dzięki uprzejme za szybką interwencję i wycofanie! :)
Barroszt (2025-02-20 20:16:03+00:00): Uff dobrze że szybko wyłapane. Pozdrawiam z Torunia!
michi68 (2026-03-17 23:48:28+00:00): accesso privato è formalmente corretto, ma per una questione di opportunità non avrei cambiato l'accessibilità, considerato che c'è un contenzioso aperto con il privato e la questione probabilmente finirà in tribunale.
il Vaz (2026-03-18 08:07:06+00:00): Sì sono al corrente di tua la situazione del 1043
Tra l’altro sono collaboratore della raccolta firme a favore della riapertura del suddetto sentiero. 
Ma difatti il sentiero non è praticabile ad oggi, sarebbe scorretto metterlo open. 
Attendiamo lo sviluppo della vicenda.
michi68 (2026-03-18 08:14:43+00:00): 👍
michi68 (2026-04-28 10:48:06+00:00): Oggi leggo che il proprietario ha confermato che sono state persino cambiate le mappe e che il sentiero 1043 ufficiale è quello con la variante. Sono sempre più convinto che per ragioni di opportunità la variante andrebbe cancellata.
il Vaz (2026-04-28 11:32:30+00:00): Sto seguendo anche io la vicenda. 
Attualmente non mi sento di cancellare definitivamente un sentiero storico. 
Difatto l'accesso privato inibisce alle maggiori app di trekking di considerarlo valido per un percorso. 
Attenderei lo sviluppo della contesa.
IreuN (2025-04-08 14:28:14+00:00): Cześć, skoro tam są słupki to chyba powinno się dodać też dopowiedni access? Droga jest przejezdna dla aut?
Adam_Piszczek (2025-04-08 20:57:15+00:00): Nie mam czasu na zajęcie się tym miejscem.Nie ma możliwości dla aut,fragment jest jak nawierzchnia drogi rowerowej.Jest to nowe bo był tam remont.Znajde czas to poprawie,trzeba tam jeszcze raz żeby ślad gpx zapisać i wyrysować.
eggie (2025-02-20 08:06:53+00:00): Welcome to OSM.
I merged your info with the present addressnode.
Greetz,
eggie
Stretch Longfellow (2025-08-15 15:59:54+00:00): Why did you eliminate service=driveway?
rsitoni_Lyft (2025-08-19 11:21:23+00:00): Hi, Stretch Longfellow!
My name is Ravinder, and I’m a mapper in the OSM team at Lyft. 

I left one road (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/660070833) with the driveway tag because it was already mapped as a driveway. I added the other roads without the driveway tag as according to background imagery & Mapillary imagery (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=2955600471281836&focus=photo&lat=40.847459473418&lng=-96.738368359494&z=17&x=0.7860515793724374&y=0.5180032806745453&zoom=1.2949640287769784), building (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/198253092) is related to logistics, so I don’t think that driveway should be there. The driveway was later removed by Easy_pete (https://osmcha.org/changesets/169263153). I notice that you have already added driveway tags across the entire area. While this does not align with our mapping policy, we understand that there are different approaches within OSM. I would appreciate it if you could share your thoughts on this matter. Anyway, thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Best regards, Ravinder
Vinber-Pro (2025-02-21 10:34:00+00:00): Bonjour,
je pense que Bat C est davantage à mettre dans une ref et CINOR peut-être plutôt dans la description.

Est ce que tu fais la modif ou je m'en occupe ?

à plus
BCNorwich (2025-02-20 07:21:27+00:00): Sorry about the large BB I tried to upload each feature separately but the box remained large.
popsy974 (2025-02-20 07:32:36+00:00): Modification du nom de l'entreprise et ajout d'informations complémentaires sur l'entreprise
popsy974 (2025-02-20 07:30:21+00:00): Création d'un restaurant avec piscine