piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mueschel (2024-06-29 09:10:19+00:00): hi,
could you check this way, it got a strange 'rugns' tag:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/362725847
pfg21 (2024-07-01 08:05:55+00:00): Thanks, I got the letter sequence wrong :)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:rungs
CurlingMan13 (2025-02-05 04:02:22+00:00): Changeset reverted.  These are residential roads, not living streets.  Living streets are very rare in the US.
See:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dliving_street#United_States

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162149438
Geim (2024-09-21 07:33:26+00:00): Hallo Eliza, Waarom heb je van deze 3 bospercelen een multipolygon gemaakt met 3 outers? 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17773444
DressyPear4 (2024-06-28 15:42:16+00:00): Olá, discuta com a comunidade antes de alterar a classificação de rodovias
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153248490
literan (2024-06-27 17:09:52+00:00): куда-то делся полигон landuse на ЖК - сломался?
anastasia_ (2024-06-27 22:01:17+00:00): упс, спасибо. поправила
LockOnGuy (2024-07-07 17:08:25+00:00): Hello haider73, Why did you change the street name and what is your source?   
Regards.
Noktoborus (2024-06-27 17:23:09+00:00): Здравствуйте!

Обратите внимание на тег smoothness: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:smoothness?uselang=ru

sufrace=gravel не показатель того, что дорога действительно плохая.
Allroads (2024-06-27 14:39:35+00:00): Ik zag je changeset tekst avontuur --avontuurlijk.

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=295607218881131
Als ik het zo bekijk is het een duiker, geen brug.

Een leuning zegt niet alles.

Bevestiging van het waterschap.
https://open-geodata-portaal-valleienveluwe.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/ValleienVeluwe::duiker-sifon/explore

Dit zijn de bruggen
https://open-geodata-portaal-valleienveluwe.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/ValleienVeluwe::legger-watersysteem-1/explore?layer=5
Deze lagen had ik in Qgis staan van het waterschap. omdat ik ze nodig had voor wat anders.
jj000 (2024-06-27 14:48:32+00:00): Hoi allroads. Dank voor het meedenken. De weg was al getagged met bridge=yes. Daarom ben ik de man made tag gaan toevoegen. 

https://imgur.com/a/UwZHJX5

Vind jij op basis van deze afbeelding echt dat het geen brug is? Ik twijfel.
jj000 (2024-06-27 14:58:04+00:00): Ik ga jouw bronnen bekijken, kom er op terug. Als het geen brug is, haal ik m natuurlijk weg.
pos513 (2024-08-20 05:09:47+00:00): Ahoj,

Na adandoned si zmenil aj úsek trate, ktorý mal zostať funkčný. V prvej etape bude sprevádzkovaná iba severná časť preložky a po časti starej koľaje sa ešte zhruba rok bude jazdiť.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/686576299
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/686576301
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/687897399
Michal Polášek (2024-08-20 06:30:19+00:00): Ahoj, díky za upozornění, nevěděl jsem, že se přeložky nebudou zprovozňovat současně. Ty tři úseky jsem tedy upravil na railway=construction a zkopíroval atributy prvního úseku ve směru na Čadcu.
pos513 (2024-08-26 10:57:27+00:00): Ahoj, ďakujem. Ja som to pôvodne nechal ako railway=rail preto, že na tom úseku sa nepracuje (iba sa v pôvodnom stave napojí na novú trať), ale je to vlastne jedno, kľudne nech je to construction. Rýchlosť som ešte zmenil na planned:maxspeed podľa plánovacej dokumentácie, ktorá je ešte stále na webe ŽSR.
pesticides (2024-06-27 14:08:25+00:00): Questionable that this route should even exist in OSM. I've ridden parts of it and don't remember seeing any signs for it.
Natfoot (2024-11-07 19:05:51+00:00): there are no signs for the national bike route network yet they are still in OSM
Natfoot (2024-11-07 19:06:56+00:00): This is not the XWA as is. I am working on a system to better connect bike and walk with an new org and this is a proposal.
NATFOOT
Rodrigo Rega (2024-10-09 23:57:05+00:00): Voy a proceder a deshacer este cambio. Por las misma razón que la que se te informó en https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153250668
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153250445
EP_Repair (2024-09-19 16:12:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 156828449 where the changeset comment is: Reverting speed limit changes that were not field verified and have never been posted on the beltways
Rodrigo Rega (2024-10-10 00:20:20+00:00): He procedido a deshacer este cambio. Por las misma razón que la que se te informó en https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153250668
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153250569
Rodrigo Rega (2024-10-10 00:17:41+00:00): He procedido a deshacer este cambio. Por las misma razón que la que se te informó en https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153250668
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153250616
blitz21 (2024-08-19 04:20:23+00:00): Most jest na całej długości tej drogi? Bo wg. aktualnego zdefiniowania tak wychodzi
Kamil8202 (2024-08-22 15:02:37+00:00): Nie, most jest tylko na końcu, coś musiałem źle zdefiniować. Dzięki za uwagę już poprawiam.
Hugoren Martinako (2024-10-08 18:28:17+00:00): Boas, o nome de "Sangenjo" aínda úsase frecuentemente polo turismo castelán. OSM non pode negar a realidade, mas si pode ter peor calidade nas súas procuras ao non atopar a toponimia.
Saúdos
CRCulver (2024-06-28 17:50:39+00:00): Your edits to Registon ko’chasi in Samarkand are incorrect. That is, in changeset 152999693 one week ago, I remapped Registon ko’chasi completely between Universitet bulvari and Islom Karimov bog’i: in an earlier version, this road was incorrectly mapped as a dual carriageway, but it is in fact a single carriageway with lanes=4, lanes:forward=2, lanes:backward=2. This is easily verifiable by doing a personal survey of the road.

Somehow this correct mapping was undone, either in changeset 153159867 by user FUZZY_42, or in your recent changesets. Please let me know if you were responsible for this error, otherwise I will revert all the way back to FUZZY_42’s changeset.
CRCulver (2024-06-29 13:56:05+00:00): I have remapped this portion of Registon ko'chasi correctly in changeset 153333465. Note that if you want to make further changes to the intersection of Kulolon ko'chasi and Registon ko'chasi, the primary_link roads (which I added a few days ago) are new and do not yet appear on Bing or Esri imagery.
ChromeLotus (2024-07-01 21:32:26+00:00): Hello CRCulver. Thank you for reaching out. My changeset (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153250742) was made after FUZZY_42’s modifications (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152999693), and it was intended to minimize data regressions in that part of Samarkand. For instance, there was a missing oneway tag in one section of the carriageway (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1294770590) and a few highway features were crossing another (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/109922766). Hopefully that answers your question.

Thank you for updating this area and keeping me informed! I will defer to your edits.
ChromeLotus.
Rodrigo Rega (2024-10-10 00:15:55+00:00): He procedido a deshacer este cambio. Por las misma razón que la que se te informó en https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153250668
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153250777
EP_Repair (2024-09-19 16:12:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 156828449 where the changeset comment is: Reverting speed limit changes that were not field verified and have never been posted on the beltways
aTarom (2024-06-27 19:08:10+00:00): Hola gracias por editar, cuando puedas revisa este elemento
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12015093982/history
se ha quedado con un tag de importación
gpxicon=Trail Head
me dices, saludos, disculpa brevedad
Lloc (2024-06-28 19:32:49+00:00): Hola aTarom. Se quedó un punto de la importación del gps por eliminar y por convertir en aparcamiento. Subsanado. Saludos y gracias.
mcliquid (2024-06-27 15:38:08+00:00): DIe Pfarrkirche Krumbach in Vorarlberg wurde auch verändert. Beabsichtigt oder ein kleiner Fehler?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/217763681
mapperich (2024-06-27 15:56:35+00:00): Nicht beabsichtigt, eigentlich wollte ich wirklich nur Objekte in Niederösterreich bearbeiten, jedoch sind die beiden Krumbach im osm checker in einem Eintrag. Und ich hab nicht auf die Postleitzahl geachtet. Die Zuweisung der tags stimmt natürlich trotzdem.
mcliquid (2024-06-27 16:24:21+00:00): Danke dir! Dann passt's eh
Frans S (2024-08-07 12:40:03+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
PLease square all your rectangular buildings.
you added a layer -1 to a few highways. Why?  I see no reason. and it is either a tunnel.
Best regards
Lois Edwards (2024-08-07 13:17:45+00:00): I always did press Q, it just didn't always square them completely. Any time I added a layer, it was as the existing mapping appeared wrong and I wanted to map something in it's place, but didn't want to disregard someone else's work and assume I knew better than them. I never edited any roads, only buildings, and if anything asked me to resolve something being on top of something else, I always clicked the option to put it on the layer below.
Frans S (2024-08-07 14:14:08+00:00): Hello. Yes, you are right. Most mappings by you are fine squared.
What I don't understand is your explanation of using a layer.
Adding a layer means that it is above ground level, 
layer=1 . A Bridge  crossing a waterway.
layer=-1.  A ford crossing a waterway
Layer=1 added to a building, Example . roof above a fuel station. 
The alignment you make is overruling the mapping of previous mapper, but underground or something when you add a layer=-1
Don't be afraid to change something when you are convinced that your view is correct.

Best regards
Lois Edwards (2024-08-07 14:35:59+00:00): Ah okay, apologies, I didn't realise that. I have mapped a LOT of buildings and I have occasionally done this, but I never deliberately meant to mark something as under ground. Sorry!
EP_Repair (2024-09-19 16:12:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 156828449 where the changeset comment is: Reverting speed limit changes that were not field verified and have never been posted on the beltways
PLima785 (2024-07-09 13:30:31+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Base_line_kerb_line.png
PLima785 (2024-07-09 13:39:18+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Street_parking
ve a parte do parking:side:direction 
para alguns dos estacionamentos em espinha
está fixe a edição mas tenta ver onde vale a pena ter o parque de estacionamento fora da linha
dmfr (2024-07-09 20:37:57+00:00): Obrigado! Já adicionei o parking:direction. Não percebi o que queres dizer com "tenta ver onde vale a pena ter o parque de estacionamento fora da linha", podes dar um exemplo?
PLima785 (2024-07-13 10:27:32+00:00): vou te deixar um exemplo que segue as regras mais recentes da comunidade https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153887342#map=18/41.23340/-8.61643
Faltam detalhes como o numero de lugares mas isso vai se preenchendo indo ao local
Belle Haven Mapper (2024-06-30 16:50:33+00:00): Posted limit here is 55 mph, not 70 mph. All of the changes here need to be reverted.

This verifiable from the Virginia DOT Speed Limits Map (all data is available under an open data license).

https://www.virginiaroads.org/maps/VDOT::vdot-speed-limits-map/about
EP_Repair (2024-09-19 16:12:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 156828449 where the changeset comment is: Reverting speed limit changes that were not field verified and have never been posted on the beltways
GanderPL (2024-06-27 15:43:34+00:00): Dodatkowo, można użyć tagu crossing=no, który oznacza, że w danym miejscu nie ma wyznaczonego przejścia, mimo że mogłoby się wydawać, że takie przejście powinno tam być.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153251952
GanderPL (2024-06-27 15:45:34+00:00): Postaraj się zawsze dodawać opis, mogło być "dodanie notatki, iż jest to dzikie przejście", ale tagi access=no i crossing=no mogą być same wystarczające
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153251952
Hufkratzer (2024-06-29 19:12:27+00:00): Hi,
ist https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1296656195 nicht ein Reitplatz, so wie https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/513811621 ? Das ist auf dem Luftbild nicht zu erkennen, aber die haben etwa die gleiche Größe. Dann wäre das bessere Tagging leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian, siehe wiki.
sauerland-radfahrer (2024-06-30 09:03:47+00:00): Hallo Hufkratzer,
hast Recht. Eine Reitanlage ist das eigentlich nicht.
Habe ich geändert. Hättest du auch gerne machen dürfen.
VG.
Hufkratzer (2024-06-30 12:05:04+00:00): Es hätte auch ein Paddock sein können, wo die Pferde nur rumstehen.
GanderPL (2024-06-27 16:17:32+00:00): Dodawaj opisy nawet do trywialnych zmian. Tutaj dodałeś szczegóły do budynku oraz usunąłeś wyburzone budynki.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153252468
GanderPL (2024-06-27 16:11:43+00:00): Nie usuwamy prywatnych obiektów. One nadal istnieją w terenie, więc powinny być na mapie. Jeśli coś jest prywatne to ma access=private.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153253016
Kamil8202 (2024-06-27 16:54:26+00:00): Jasne, dziękuje za pouczenie dopiero co zaczynam z edycją.
GanderPL (2024-06-27 16:07:53+00:00): Nie bardzo wiem czemu usunąłeś landuse. To już nie są pola uprawne?

Ponadto, poprawiłeś szereg budynków, ale mogłeś poprawić ich geometrię na podstawie danych z "Geoportal 2: Ewidencja budynków WMS"
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153253199
RobertK_PL (2024-06-27 16:54:07+00:00): Dziwne... tutaj widzę jakby ten tag był rzeczywiście usunięty. Natomiast w JOSM oraz iD ten tag na tym polu nadal jest. 

Możliwe, że przy wycinaniu stawu w Tłuste pokręciłem coś z relacjami ale tag i tak mi się wyświetla w obu edytorach (razem z type:multipolygon), nie wiem jak to więc poprawić...
Natomiast z poziomu OSMa rzeczywiście nie ma landuse'a...

Budynki zrobiłem z Binga ale zaciągnę podkład z GeoPortalu przy drugiej iteracji.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153253199
GanderPL (2024-06-27 17:19:58+00:00): Nie oceniaj swoich zmian na OSMCha bo to lakowanie swoich postów 😅
EP_Repair (2024-09-19 16:12:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 156828449 where the changeset comment is: Reverting speed limit changes that were not field verified and have never been posted on the beltways
Leo Slager (2024-06-27 22:38:22+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Leo Slager (2024-06-27 22:44:33+00:00): Dag Green-tree,

Ik heb de tag "tourism=guest_house" toegevoegd.
Dan verschijnt er ook een symbool en een naam op de kaart.
zk135 (2024-06-27 15:49:59+00:00): #GWUGeog
zk135 (2024-06-27 15:50:30+00:00): Added buildings using Maxar
GanderPL (2024-06-27 15:57:30+00:00): WAY: 344213910 Czy to jest sklep mięsny, czy rzeźnia?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153253633
Kamil8202 (2024-06-27 16:10:34+00:00): Jest to sklep mięsny
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153253633
GanderPL (2024-06-27 16:24:36+00:00): Sam sobie wystawiłeś ocenę na OSMCha? :D to jak polubienie własnego posta w Social Media.
NicaTopo (2024-06-28 12:17:53+00:00): Hi,

Please square out all building shapes. More than 99% are square.
Thank you.

Michael
EP_Repair (2024-09-19 16:12:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 156828449 where the changeset comment is: Reverting speed limit changes that were not field verified and have never been posted on the beltways
zk135 (2024-06-27 15:49:12+00:00): #GWUGeog
zk135 (2024-06-27 15:50:42+00:00): Added buildings using Maxar
EP_Repair (2024-09-19 16:12:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 156828449 where the changeset comment is: Reverting speed limit changes that were not field verified and have never been posted on the beltways
Heideammer (2024-06-28 08:20:08+00:00): Super und vielen lieben Dank für die Anpassung. Ein kleiner Tipp von mir: In dem Online-Editor "ID" kann man - nachdem man ein Objekt gewählt hat - über die Q-Taste ein Polygon rechtwinkelig ausgestalten. Das ist für das Zeichnen von Gebäuden eine gute Hilfe. Viele Grüße
EP_Repair (2024-09-19 16:12:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 156828449 where the changeset comment is: Reverting speed limit changes that were not field verified and have never been posted on the beltways
EP_Repair (2024-09-19 16:12:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 156828449 where the changeset comment is: Reverting speed limit changes that were not field verified and have never been posted on the beltways
justinbstrick (2024-07-23 15:52:47+00:00): I believe we already had automobile permissions turned off and there are very specific ways we have to label golf cart access that was turned off on one of these paths (we use a custom golf cart routing app for phones in our city). We also label these as "paths" not "golf cart paths" as these are multi-use paths that are not just for golf carts, but pedestrians, bikes, skating, etc. We do label the private golf course paths as "golf cart paths". Just FYI for future reference if you edit in Peachtree City moving forward.
Ilovemap1999 (2024-06-28 02:48:29+00:00): Please checking the restriction already exist before creating new to avoid duplication
NorthCrab_upload (2024-06-27 16:20:28+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1296665381

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
EP_Repair (2024-09-19 16:12:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 156828449 where the changeset comment is: Reverting speed limit changes that were not field verified and have never been posted on the beltways
5m4u9 (2024-06-27 22:48:21+00:00): Hola, gracias por mejorar el mapa.

Living Streets no es una buena elección, son esas calles donde el peatón "tiene" prioridad sobre el auto, y en bolivia en muy pocos casos se cumple.

Creo que es mejor "service" con permiso foot=yes o si solo es peatonal directo pedestrian como las de la uyustus.
Geo-Tobi (2025-03-16 06:47:52+00:00): Hi Fabn, du hast hier den HW von path auf footway geändert und damit nur eine ungültige Kombination erzeugt. Footway mit bicycle= designated, das gibt es nicht. Zudem ist Traffic sign mit 240 gemappped. Das heißt, deine Änderung ist falsch. Korrigierst du das bitte?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/39380314
CurlingMan13 (2025-02-05 03:36:39+00:00): Changeset reverted.  These are residential roads, not living streets.  Living streets are very rare in the US.
See:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dliving_street#United_States

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162149053
5m4u9 (2024-06-27 23:03:45+00:00): Hola Limber, gracias por tu contribución.

Solo una sugerencia. Los nombres de las calles siempre van en este formato → "Calle 1" o "Calle Primera", siempre en mayúscula las primeras letras de cada palabra, excepto en de/la/los.

Ya lo corregí.
CurlingMan13 (2025-02-05 03:32:29+00:00): Changeset reverted.  These are residential roads, not living streets.  Living streets are very rare in the US.
See:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dliving_street#United_States

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162149000
wermak (2024-07-06 00:01:05+00:00): Hallo giggie, 

bitte diese geschlossenen Geschäfte nicht einfach aus der Karte löschen, sondern mit disused:shop=* aus der Karte entfernen. Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lebenszyklus-Präfix.

Schöne Grüße
silversurfer83 (2024-06-29 05:57:48+00:00): Hi :)

wenn der ganze Weg gesperrt ist, müssten die Berechtigungen entsprechend angepasst werden. Wenn nur die Brücke gesperrt ist, sollte nur die Brücke auf construction gesetzt werden und an dem Brückenabschnitt entsprechend der Zugang beschränkt werden.

cheers
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153256819
mtmail (2024-06-29 14:04:40+00:00): Ich habe die access Tags der Brücke jetzt auf 'no' gesetzt. Ist sicher nur temporär, der Rest des Weges ist ok.
silversurfer83 (2024-06-29 14:15:03+00:00): Alles klar 👍🏻

(Da gehen ja einige Wanderrelationen entlang. Dann wird das hoffentlich bald wieder. Hast du du zufällig ein Auge drauf?)
mtmail (2024-06-29 14:27:44+00:00): Leider nein, waren dort auch nur auf einer Tagestour und sind einer Komoot Route gefolgt.
mueschel (2024-06-28 09:57:56+00:00): Hi,
what's the meaning of the new 'stpauls' tag here? Is this some kind of official route?
pianoman24 (2024-07-16 00:39:33+00:00): I added it to all the trails officially managed by St. Paul's. I found the "operator" tag later unfortunately and switched to that one. Do you know if there's a way to delete tags?
mueschel (2024-07-19 10:03:42+00:00): Hi,
you can delete tags in the same way you added them in your editor. However, I already changed all these tags to "operator".
kapazao (2024-06-30 08:47:38+00:00): Hola, por favor trata de hacer conjuntos de cambios algo más pequeños y comentar bien lo que haces en ellos, ya que el comentario "correcciones" no ayuda a otros usuarios y has abarcado demasiadas cosas que no son solo correcciones.
En caso de que se hayan hecho cosas mal podría revertirse todo el conjunto de cambios y se perdería también trabajo bien hecho.

Un saludo y gracias por tus contribuciones.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153257082
Đuro Jiří (2024-07-18 20:03:30+00:00): Podle mě bude lepší "access - customers", než "disused:amenity - toilets", protože philipp-rupert tady píše že informace byly zavřené a ne zrušené.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3709988

Meiner Meinung nach wird "Zugang - Kunden" besser sein als "Stillgelegt: Amenity - Toiletten", denn Philipp-Rupert schreibt hier, dass die Information geschlossen und nicht aufgehoben wurde.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3709988
rene78 (2024-07-18 20:49:28+00:00): Danke für die Info!
LockOnGuy (2024-06-27 19:10:38+00:00): Hello haider73,   
Please do use meaningful changeset comments - “.تعديل موقع” which translate to "edit location" does not help other mappers understand what you are doing.   
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments   
Regards.
stneu (2024-07-01 13:52:28+00:00): Weshalb haben Sie denn in Poing den Froschteich in Hundesee umgelabelt? Gibt es dazu ein Statement seitens der Stadtverwaltung oder im Amtsblatt. Mir ist nichts bekannt.
aseidel (2024-08-07 16:11:07+00:00): Liebe:r ChMenges,
bitte die Schreibweise der Breitenangabe korrigieren (width=3 statt width=3m).
Danke und herzliche Grüße
Antje Seidel
#lgmaps
Berlin53 (2024-07-01 22:25:35+00:00): Hallo Rejakos,
ich möchte dich bitten, schnellstmöglich wieder den aktuellen Zustand der Straßenbahngleise am Bhf. Schöneweide entsprechend dem Baufortschritt wiederherzustellen. Deine Änderungen entbehren zum Großteil jeder Grundlage. Da dies im Einzelnen kaum möglich sein sollte, schlage ich vor, den kompletten Änderungssatz erstmal rückgängig zu machen.
Berlin53