piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-27 01:14:11+00:00): Unfortunately, there are yet more numerous issues here, most or all of which could have been avoided by any of either studying the example I previously provided you in changeset 186372980 , reading the wiki page I previously linked you, carefully double-checking your changes, or not ignoring the validator warnings that iD helpfully provided you. 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186372980

Specifically:

- You created two different overlapping ways for the amenity area, both with identical tags and no obvious reason why. Per the basic rules of OSM, https://osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element

- Furthermore, there already _was_ a single outer way with good alignment and correct tags, way 375880935 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/375880935 but you inexplicably deleted it in your previous changeset 186343045 https://osm.org/changeset/186343045

- You copied the building=* tag to both outer ways, making them into huge buildings overlapping with both each other and the actual school building (that iD gave you several warnings about)

- the address and operator tags should should all get moved to the POI way, along with grades=* which was deleted without being moved at all while name=* was kept on both. Again, see https://osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element

Once again, I've fixed all this for you as well as issues from your other related changesets in my changeset 186429694

https://osm.org/changeset/186429694
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-27 19:04:03+00:00): It seems you are drawing driveways as areas rather than linear ways leading to all sorts of issues and iD errors that you must have chosen to bypass. There is a way to represent them as areas, area:highway=* (e.g. area:highway=service service=driveway ) but that is relatively rare especially in the US and still requires mapping the linear way separately, and is an advanced technique requiring following some rather complex guidelines. I would not recommend it especially as a beginner; even I don't really delve into it myself.

https://osm.wiki/Key:area:highway

https://osm.wiki/Proposal:Area_highway/mapping_guidelines

You could in theory tag your existing areas with area:highway=service, area:highway=footway, etc., and modify them to follow the guidelines plus also add linear ways to each of them, but I would instead recommend just reverting them (I'm happy to do that for you, just let you know) and then you can add the linear ways instead, if you want to.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-29 18:00:47+00:00): Fixed yourself in changeset 186542510, thanks!

https://osm.org/changeset/186542510
Ewen Hill (2026-07-26 00:42:39+00:00): Full list of reverted changesets which has been passed to the DWG...
186372926
186372923
186372921
186372918
186372914
186372913
186372909
186372907
186372906
186372900
186372899
186372898
186372897
186372896
186372895
186372894
186372892
186372891
186372889
186372878
186372875
186372872
186372870
186372865
186372863
186372861
186372859
186372856
186372839
186372837
186372834
186372832
186372830
186372827
186372823
186372821
186372817
186372816
186372812
186372808
186372756
186372749
186372628
186371111
186352714
186352697
186352693
186352685
186352669
186352667
186352640
186352625
186352369
O1S (2026-07-26 00:46:39+00:00): Replace Sonesta Select Brookfield Wisconsin with AmericInn based on current website and local knowledge. Update hotel details including website and phone, remove outdated tags, and preserve relevant former information with lifecycle prefixes to prevent future re-additions from outdated sources.
Negreheb (2026-07-26 21:03:43+00:00): Hey, ich seh ein, dass tertiary vielleicht eine klasse zu hoch ist, aber die Verbindung zum Salzachsee wird so viel genutzt, dass es sinn machen würde als unclassified, oder? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dunclassified 

Ich hab mal im Matrix/IRC-Chat unter https://matrix.to/#/#osm-at:matrix.org nachgefragt, was andere aus Österreich zu dem Thema halten :)
Vektor_567 (2026-07-26 21:32:02+00:00): hallo, ich habe mir das gleiche gedacht, kam bisher aber zu der Information, dass unclassified und residential hierachisch ident sind, mit dem Unterschied, dass residential durch Wohngebiete führt und unclassified außerhalb von Wohngebieten ist.
Josef-Brandstätter-Straße in Liefering   zwischen dem Gewerbegebiet und  und den Sportplätzen ist unclassified.  Zwischen Autobahn, Münchner Bundesstraße, Salzach und Salzachsee gibt es in Liefering eigentlich keine tertiary. es gibt auch keinen farblichen unterschied. zwischen residential und unclassified auf der normalen Karte. 

In Salzburg sind einige Straßenabschnitte, welche wirklich tertiary wären, aber nicht als solche im OSM eingetragen (vermutlich aus verkehrspolitischen Überlegungen der Stadt Salzburg

Anmerkung: manche habe ich zwischenzeitlich mal umgeändert gehabt, aber dann teilweise wieder rückgängig gemacht.
Negreheb (2026-07-26 21:36:00+00:00): Wie im anderen CS schon geschrieben (hier nur der vollständigkeit halber) laut der übersicht https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:highway gilt für Österreich auch "Straßen mit Verbindungscharakter in einem Wohngebiet" und das trifft hier ziemlich klar zu, finde ich. Ich werde einen entsprechenden absatz auf der detailseite im Wiki unter https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dtertiary hinzufügen, damit das gleich ist und Sinn macht. :)
Vektor_567 (2026-07-26 21:55:13+00:00): moment. ich schaue mir das an...
Vektor_567 (2026-07-26 22:14:50+00:00): ich habe Verbindungsstraßen wiederhergestellt, wo es Sinn macht. Ein Straßenabschnitt mit Fahrverbot darf jedenfalls nicht als tertiary definiert werden, also der Abschnitt der Schmiedingerstraße zwischen Münchner Bundesstraße und ON45 fällt damit definitiv weg. Die sonstige  Hierachie wurde wiederhergestellt, sofern das örtlich passt und zusätzlich die Bessarabierstraße hinzugefügt.
hwierzbicki (2026-07-26 15:42:37+00:00): Hi mdroads, 

Thanks for adding this useful info! Just a few notes about best practice when it comes to tagging masts/towers:

- Mobile Phone tags (communication:mobile_phone=yes): I noticed this got dropped. Both WCEM and T-Mobile co-locate on this site, so both the radio and mobile phone tags should coexist.
- Mast vs. tower: The key differentiator between masts and towers is accessibility. Towers have platforms and/or stairs, whereas masts have ladder steps only. This structure is ladder-access lattice, so mast makes more sense here.
- Structure name: The mast belongs to STC Three LLC, so adding "WCEM-FM Tower" as the structure name misattributes the site.

The easiest way to map this is probably to separate the broadcast tags from the structure tags - map each tenant as a separate antenna (with relevant per-tenant values) located near the structure.
Negreheb (2026-07-26 21:06:03+00:00): Hier denke ich auch, dass die direktvervbindung zum Messezentrum ein unclassified vertragen könnte. 
Ich muss aber dazu sagen, dass ich bei der highway-klassifizierung noch nie so wahnsinnig viel gemacht habe, weil ich mir nicht zutraue sachen, die so lange schon eingetragen sind einfach so ohne Diskussion umzutaggen. 
Aber ich seh schon, dass tertiary nicht der Fall ist https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway=tertiary?uselang=de 

> werden untergeordnete Straßen gekennzeichnet, die Dörfer oder Gemeinden verbinden.

Das trifft ja ganz offensichtlich nicht zu, so viel steht schon fest :D
Negreheb (2026-07-26 21:25:03+00:00): Ich wurde im Chat gerade auf etwas hingewiesen auf der Überischt im Wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:highway

> Österreich
>    für Landesstraßen L mit höherer Nummer, Gemeindeverbindungsstraßen, Straßen mit Verbindungscharakter in einem Wohngebiet. Siehe Landesstraßen in Österreich

Und das trifft schon zu, also sollte das schon tertiary bleiben. 

Ich werde mal versuchen die ganzen umtaggings zu finden und zu revertieren. Wenn du so lang bestehende kategorisierungen für so grundstäzliche straßen durchführen möchtest, fände ich es gut, wenn du das vielleicht gesammelt in einem Foren-Thread diskutieren würdest.
Vektor_567 (2026-07-26 21:52:49+00:00): hallo, das davor bestehende "tertiary" der Bessarabierstraße war von mir! - siehst du auch im Verlauf.

ich habe das danach wieder entfernt, weil ich sehe, dass in Salzburg vorsätzlich mehrere Straßen als Ortsstraße definiert wurden, obwohl diese eindeutig Sammelstraßen sind, nur damit das nicht in Routern vor gereiht wird. - die Rückstufung erfolgte, weil ich nicht schuld sein möchte, wenn deshalb mehr hier zufahren, anstatt über die Autobahn
JesseFTW (2026-07-30 12:15:41+00:00): Thanks for adding these!
yitimox (2026-07-26 05:50:45+00:00): please do not map military zones.
baotao (2026-07-28 15:11:24+00:00): 勿将Road缩写为Rd，即使官方名称是Rd
rohieb (2026-07-26 03:06:06+00:00): Korrektur, source ist natürlich "survey [2026-07-22]", nicht 2025…
jandar22 (2026-07-28 15:38:05+00:00): Hello, I recommend revising this marker to place=town. Please note that while this municipality may refer to itself as "City of Estacada" the place=* key in OSM is based on population/significance rather than local nomenclature, for consistency across regions. Note for comparison the towns of Sandy (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/150952151) or Molalla (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/150940447) that actually have slightly larger populations than Estacada while still being well below the typical range that would warrant place=city. Please revise, and see documentation linked.

Also, I would recommend being more specific with the source of the population number, since I see the source date is from 2025. The last US Census was conducted in 2020, so if this population number is from a local/regional census or from an American Community Survey I would recommend calling that out specifically rather than source:population=census. Thanks!
Landline3199 (2026-07-28 23:29:21+00:00): Thanks for letting me know! I've switched the population from the 2025 estimate from the US Census Bureau (https://www.census.gov/data/tables/time-series/demo/popest/2020s-total-cities-and-towns.html) over to the 2020 census number as to stick to the current verified number. I also changed it to be a town per your suggestion. Thanks for the heads up about how OSM defines a town versus a city.
jandar22 (2026-07-28 23:37:41+00:00): No problem! Thanks very much for the quick reply and revision!
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-27 19:07:05+00:00): Like in changeset 186374149 with driveways, it seems you are drawing footways as areas rather than linear ways leading to all sorts of issues and iD errors that you must have chosen to bypass. While in theory you could modify the tagging, add the required linear ways as well and also make any other required changes to follow the relevant guideline, like there I'd strongly recommend just reverting this (which I can do for you, or in this case you can simply delete the single way here) and add it as a linear feature instead.

https://osm.org/changeset/186374149
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-28 18:52:10+00:00): Fixed by @O1S in changeset 186534842

https://osm.org/changeset/186534842
nerihv (2026-07-26 03:21:14+00:00): esri más actualdesplazado tomando referencia el camino 0.12, 4.98. el resto de los poligonos esta mapeado con bing
mavl (2026-07-27 14:18:20+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок добавляет больницу, но эта больница уже есть на карте. Вы уже в третий раз добавляете её дубликат.
Kovoschiz (2026-07-26 13:29:05+00:00): Please don't do undiscussed change of `old_name=` to other `*_name=`
Kovoschiz (2026-07-26 13:29:47+00:00): This is a road `highway=`
This Value Is Blank (2026-07-31 01:49:01+00:00): Also created note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5418204
MappingMore (2026-07-27 05:55:50+00:00): Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186436708
TrickyFoxy (2026-07-26 11:44:32+00:00): Не шалите
Marton Ádám (2026-07-27 19:13:16+00:00): Szia! A Vonal: 356370923 módosítását milyen információ alapján végezted?
tapai (2026-07-28 04:58:22+00:00): Szervusz Ádám! A strava heatmap térképe alapján, ha van jobb mérésed, akkor légyszívesd javítsd ki az általam végzett módosítást. Üdv, tapai
Marton Ádám (2026-07-29 06:16:50+00:00): De azért megnézted személyesen, hogy van-e ott út, és nem egy ismeretlen ember, ismeretlen időben, ismeretlen minőségű, nem térképezési céllal készült  track-je alapján javítod a térképet?
Hufkratzer (2026-07-26 08:43:49+00:00): Hi,
what is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1544730604 ? It is probably not horse riding centre ( leisure=horse_riding ) as it is much too small. This is a horse riding centre: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/854412537 . https://www.openstreetmap.org is even quite small for a round pen. Is it perhaps a part of a horse walker ( animal=horse_walker ) ?
Wildsharky (2026-07-29 06:58:54+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186498745
user_5359 (2026-07-27 10:38:37+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/578920153. What is the mean of the tag Masinga substation = UCB20 ?
eggie (2026-07-26 07:13:03+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback Je hebt aan het vlak heide wegkenmerken toegevoegd. Dat is helaas niet correct. Ik zal je aanpassen.

Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=186383188
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Nixionn (2026-07-26 08:14:27+00:00): This is a udot camera please delete it
Nixionn (2026-07-26 08:13:59+00:00): This is a udot camera please delete it
alpacaMaps (2026-07-30 02:33:08+00:00): This changeset adds one or more surveillance cameras in a spot that looks unlikely — the nodes sit well away from any road, which usually means the cameras aren't physically present on the ground.

If these cameras are real, please let us know so the map stays accurate. Otherwise, we'd kindly ask that you avoid adding cameras that aren't actually there, and that you remove any temporary or test nodes once you're done.

If this was simply a mistake, no problem at all — just clean up the nodes that don't correspond to a real-world camera, and leave a quick note here so we can help.

Thanks for helping keep OpenStreetMap accurate.

— alpacaMaps
tux67 (2026-07-27 07:31:21+00:00): width=0 - really? Would this be more like an infromal way? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:informal%3Dyes
If no longer existing, I would more expect something like abandoned:highway=path

Regards
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186385616
Patrickvw (2026-07-27 13:18:51+00:00): Okay, you're right. I adjusted the width to 0,5m because the path is barely accessible on foot anymore!

Regards
Patrickvw
tux67 (2026-07-27 13:21:22+00:00): thanks
ajmat (2026-07-27 10:22:52+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186447874
Wildsharky (2026-07-29 06:54:08+00:00): Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186435255
CNHighways (2026-07-27 01:09:06+00:00): 不要在name里面写道路编号（034县道）这样的，有ref就够了
CNHighways (2026-07-27 01:10:47+00:00): 快速路和国道才用干线公路，这个最多给主要道路，县道用次要道路
eggie (2026-07-26 09:22:49+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback   De trails heb ik nog niet ontdekt. Wellicht volgende changeset?
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Bienson (2026-07-27 00:22:08+00:00): Der Name "Halde Schleswig" war korrekt, nicht "Halde / Deponie Schleswig".
"Deponie Schleswig" kann als alt_name eingetragen werden.
Genauso bei der Landfläche.
H_S (2026-07-27 01:00:27+00:00): Okay, aber die Info Tafel am Eingang an der Aplerbecker Straße bezeichnet sie so.
StC (2026-07-26 12:55:38+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre qui passe par là. Je m'occupe de la réparation.
Max-Kritic (2026-07-27 07:39:11+00:00): Merci. Je n'ai pas vu. Je viens de créer des chemins. L'itinéraire pédestre doit y passer
silversurfer83 (2026-07-26 18:50:01+00:00): Hi

dein access=* hier sollte ein access:conditional=* sein, wenn ich das korrekt sehe.

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186387208
ticki_52 (2026-07-28 08:14:48+00:00): wo hier?
silversurfer83 (2026-07-28 08:23:30+00:00): Aufm Parkplatz
silversurfer83 (2026-07-26 20:30:14+00:00): Moin :)

vertippt? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:board:title ;)

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186387725
klik (2026-07-27 06:08:36+00:00): Danke fürs genaue Lesen ;)
silversurfer83 (2026-07-27 06:17:26+00:00): Zufallstreffer 😅
silversurfer83 (2026-07-26 18:47:57+00:00): Moin

Freitext in den Öffnungszeiten gerne in der üblichen Sprache der Region. Dürfe hier Deutsch sein. Danke.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186387763
eggie (2026-07-26 14:42:48+00:00): Dag Jos, 

Ik heb access=yes verwijderd. Dat hoef je niet op wegen taggen. wellicht komt het door editor iD. Die maakt van no>yes
oneway=no is default op wegen. Dat doen we alleen als je bang bent dat iemand oneway=yes gaat taggen.
Bv een tweerichting fietsrotonde. 

MVG
eggie
Udarian (2026-07-26 12:31:55+00:00): There are a quite a few issues with this changeset, first, the address added is in the state of Washington and you added this business in Florida, second when  you are a unit you shouldn't place your self on a building or building:part, when something is tagged with building:part=* please don't replace it with building=*, the addr:street=* listed uses St and other short code instead of the long form (street in this case) as in OSM the convention is to expand those in road names, you also included the unit number in the addr:street=* that has its own tag and should go in there, you also didn't use the correct format for the opening hours (for more info see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours) along with the phone number. 

Happy mapping,
Udar
Udarian (2026-07-26 12:43:07+00:00): I have reverted this in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186397026 due to the above listed issues.

Happy mapping,
Udar.
TheSwavu (2026-07-26 10:16:16+00:00): What's the source of this name?
GeeMaps! (2026-07-26 23:51:43+00:00): The NSW Roads data discussed on Discord: https://www.arcgis.com/apps/mapviewer/index.html?url=https%3A%2F%2Fportal.spatial.nsw.gov.au%2Fserver%2Frest%2Fservices%2FNSW_Transport_Theme_multiCRS%2FFeatureServer%2F6&source=sd
Schlecker (2026-07-27 10:46:59+00:00): None of my recent contributions appears on the maps. Is it maybe due to the fact that I requested them to be reviewed?
Thanks
TheSwavu (2026-07-26 10:23:37+00:00): What's the source for this name? There are no street signs and the NSW dataset has no name?
GeeMaps! (2026-07-26 23:52:47+00:00): https://www.arcgis.com/apps/mapviewer/index.html?url=https%3A%2F%2Fportal.spatial.nsw.gov.au%2Fserver%2Frest%2Fservices%2FNSW_Transport_Theme_multiCRS%2FFeatureServer%2F6&source=sd
Wildsharky (2026-07-29 06:56:09+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186452603
Wildsharky (2026-07-29 06:59:32+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186499154
topolusitania (2026-07-26 11:43:37+00:00): Olá
Alguma razão para teres reduzido o detalhe na floresta em torno do ribeiro  1030670350 ?
As fotos ESRI e de 2023 permitem um desenho mais pormenorizado
Cumprimentos
TL
Reino Baptista (2026-07-26 17:43:11+00:00): Olá!
Utilizei as imagens do Mapbox, que mostram uma mancha mais reduzida de wood e uma continuidade da forest na zona onde editei. Tendo em conta que se trata de uma área de exploração/cultivo florestal, é expectável que ocorram alterações ao longo do tempo (e é provável que volte a ser arborizada no futuro, mesmo que atualmente surja como wood em imagens mais recentes).

Caso consideres que a representação anterior era mais rigorosa, poderei reverter e ajustar com base nas ortofotomapas da ESRI.

Cumprimentos,
RB
topolusitania (2026-07-26 18:17:48+00:00): As imagens Mapbox da zona são anteriores às ESRI.  O mapeamento anterior reproduzia com mais detalhe o que existe ao nível do solo e não o existe a 3 -5 mts de altura
Cumprimentos
TL
nevw (2026-07-26 13:27:46+00:00): Hi, any reason why this is not multipolygon?
PoidaS (2026-07-26 21:24:57+00:00): I have no idea. All I wanted to do was include the words Golf Club. For a golf sim app. If you have the means of reverting this you are welcome to do so.
nevw (2026-07-27 00:29:19+00:00): Thanks PoidaS, I’ll have a look at it later and decide if it would be better mapped as a mp.
nevw (2026-07-27 10:31:55+00:00): I decided it is a good candidate and is now mapped as a mp because it comprises two parts divided by a public road. There appears to be a line of probable houses across the road from the clubhouse that are not yet marked as a residential area but can't map solely from aerial imagery.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-26 18:57:18+00:00): As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality of your mapping and avoid consequences for your account and the features you map. See https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more information.

Use of Google Maps as a source is strictly prohibited by both OSM and Google policies--see https://osm.wiki/Google for more details. Furthermore, this feature is already tagged on node 14049611724 which you edited in your previous changeset, so this is a duplicate. See https://osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14049611724

Therefore, I was required to reverted adding this duplicate SEO POI node with a prohibited source=* of Google Maps, in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/186417758
PattaFeuFeu (2026-07-26 20:50:33+00:00): Hi Studentenblume!

Du hast in deinem Changeset um Review gebeten: Die Änderungen sehen für mich gut aus. 
Du hast die vorhandenen Tags um passende Tags für diese Art von Geschäft erweitert, sodass dieser Netto jetzt standardkonform wie andere Nettos getagt ist und Wikidata-basiert den richtigen Namen trägt.

Danke für deinen Beitrag!
PattaFeuFeu (2026-07-26 21:02:49+00:00): Ein kleiner Tipp noch: Hilfreiche Changeset-Kommentare erleichtern es Anderen ungemein, auf einen Blick zu erkennen, was die Intention und die Hauptänderung hinter einem Changeset war.

Ich habe gesehen dass einige deiner Änderungen mit „updated“ hochgeladen sind.

Schau gern mal bei https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments vorbei.
Studentenblume (2026-07-29 16:27:27+00:00): Hallo PattaFeuFeu,
Danke für den Hinweiß mit den Changeset-Kommentaren. Werde ich beherzigen! OSM Daten zu bearbeiten ist noch neu für mich,
ich arbeite mich rein. ;-)
bartgron (2026-07-26 21:21:28+00:00): Zestaw zmian jest nieprawidłowy i został wycofany.
Pozdrawiam
Henrique F Simoes (2026-07-26 11:37:38+00:00): Sorry about the unrelated changes grouped together. CoMaps had a pending change and it didn't warn me it would be uploaded together with the new one.
user_5359 (2026-07-27 10:19:16+00:00): Hallo! Bitte schau Dir nochmal den Punkt https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/759803579 an. Was ist die Bedeutung des Tag Bg611 = Zwischenwegweiser Norden<->Westen ?
Fischkopp0815 (2026-07-27 11:11:19+00:00): Das ist natürlich Unsinn.Ist entfernt
ajmat (2026-07-27 04:40:35+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186434642
eggie (2026-07-26 11:27:06+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  De naam van het veer hoort op de veerroute. Niet op de ferry_terminal. De naam staat daar al op al hoort daar niet buitengebruik.
De route staat al op construction.. 
Daar hoort de naam van de halte als deze een naam heeft.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-07-26 11:32:43+00:00): De route heb ik op disused:route=ferry gezet zodat die niet meer routeert.
De halte heb ik weer ontdaan van de naam. note toegevoegd met (buiten gebruik t/m seizoen 2026)

MVG
eggie