piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2023-04-26 12:34:00+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
Square rectangular buildings
Don't connect nodes of buildings to other buildings/features
Building=yes is the only tag to be used to tag a building. No area is yes.




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135171475
Branko Kokanovic (2023-11-19 11:15:09+00:00): Jel si siguran da je ovo: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10828145504 Sanje Marinkovic, a ne Kutina? Ja cu prebaciti na Kutinu, a ti se javi ovde ili revertuj ako si siguran. U RGZ-u je Kutina
EllieNyaa (2023-04-26 03:55:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135365665 where the changeset comment is: Revert nonsensical edit.
Antonio Eugenio Burriel (2026-07-01 18:45:43+00:00): Hola de nuevo Jordi,

disculpa pero este tramo sí es un trunk_link: conecta la N340 (trunk) con la Calle de Santa Águeda (residential).
Si lo observas con atención, verás que el acceso a la gasolinera ya estaba etiquetado como service.

Al cambiarlo a service impides que los planificadores entreguen una ruta más óptima y, en este caso, más segura para vehículos ligeros.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Link_roads_between_different_highways_types

Igualmente, no es condición que la salida esté señalizada como tal
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_link
Jordi MF (2026-07-01 19:08:40+00:00): En este caso, creo que el razonamiento que hice fue que puedes llegar a la gasolinera por la calle de la Sentinella y, sin pisar la N-340, circular por la gasolinera y volver a bajar a la calle de Santa Àgueda.

Creo que nunca me he fijado si en este caso influía tanto a los navegadores el hecho de etiquetar esta vía como 'service'. Eso sí que sería un inconveniente. Ciertamente, casi todos los coches que entran a Benicàssim lo hacen por aquí y no por la salida situada unos metros más adelante. Por otra parte, también me parecería un inconveniente que los navegadores envíen por aquí a autobuses o camiones.
Jordi MF (2026-07-01 19:42:59+00:00): Se me ha olvidado añadir que tampoco debería de haber mapeado esta vía como "service" porque es verdad que no da acceso a ninguna instalación, vivienda, carril de aparcamiento, emergencias, etc.

Así que estoy de acuerdo en que no debe mapearse como "service", pero no me termina de convenecer que sea una "trunk_link". Se me ocurre mapear ese tramo como unclassified. Si no te convence, solo queda el "trunk_link", pero mi objeción se debe a que no estoy convencido que sea una vía creada a propósito para unir la carretera nacional. Me da miedo que un vehiculo de grandes dimensiones pretenda hacerle caso a un navegador porque suponga que es una vía de buena calidad (como se le debería presuponer a una "trunk").

Saludos
Antonio Eugenio Burriel (2026-07-06 15:54:42+00:00): Buenas tardes Jordi,
disculpa la demora en responderte.
Tu preocupación es muy válida, efectivamente es un gran problema para vehículos pesados por la pendiente en curva. Es por eso que la vía está destinada únicamente a vehículos ligeros de hasta 10 t, según la señalización vertical.
Voy a cambiarlo a trunk_link porque el límite de peso ya está debidamente etiquetado.
Jordi MF (2026-07-06 18:34:14+00:00): Perfecto, entonces. Gracias!
user_5589 (2023-05-15 17:50:49+00:00): You know you really should watch out when doing deleting like this.

You replaced well-tagged, albeit improvable, parking bays with a single, virtually untagged car park. That was not appreciated and I have reversed your improper deletions and removed your addition.
Frans S (2023-04-23 08:29:52+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please use the Maxar Imagery as asked in the instructions.
About tagging of buildings. 
Don't add a tag  area=yes to a building. That is meaningless.
Just 'building=yes' is sufficient.
Best regards
goldfndr (2023-04-24 22:30:59+00:00): Got a bit carried away here. Trees from imagery, most objects from previous notes.
Allison P (2023-04-22 13:09:14+00:00): That's depressing, but I'm not surprised.
Jarrardi (2023-04-22 14:49:19+00:00): Sad, yes, but that's because everyone used it as a meeting place; I hardly ever saw anyone shopping there growing up. Even the mall stopped fighting the inevitable and started billing the interior as an exercise track and community meeting place! :-)
mapperFOS (2023-04-21 00:19:00+00:00): Anhand eigener Begehung des Geländes.
mapperFOS (2023-04-21 00:22:20+00:00): Anhand eigener Begehung des Ortes.
Frans S (2023-04-26 12:41:57+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please pay more attention how to map buildings and don't cluster them.
Best regards
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-21 05:32:16+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10828274024/history - what you meant by "carts" here?

Are there people selling drinks/food there, next to this place to hide from rain/sun?
adrianojbr (2023-04-21 22:29:54+00:00): Olá!

Evite alinhar elementos exclusivamente com base em imagens de satélite. Há distorções devido as fotos serem em 2D representando um mundo 3D.

Mais informações em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Align_aerial_imagery_before_tracing.

Ainda, é possível adicionar os traços Strava com mais qualidade, conforme https://erickdeoliveiraleal.medium.com/tutorial-strava-openstreetmap-josm-or-id-2e2003f4aea3

Cabe lembrar que é o registro principalmente de ciclistas e pedestres, então tem que ter atenção ao mapear as vias por essa camada. Mas, sem dúvidas, são ótimos para conferir o alinhamento das imagens de satélite.

Abraço!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135174161
FlindersRiver (2023-04-25 09:27:11+00:00): Olá Adrianojbr, ao revisar a área percebo que as feições estavam desalinhadas. Vejo também que você reverteu minhas alterações ao estado original neste conjunto de alterações (https://osmcha.org/changesets/135211505/), o que é apreciado. Vou manter as informações que você forneceu em mente no futuro. Obrigado!
---
Hello Adrianojbr, upon reviewing the area I can see the features were misaligned. I see also that you reverted my changes to their original state in this changeset (https://osmcha.org/changesets/135211505/) which is appreciated. I will keep the information you provided in mind in the future. Thank you!
1998alexkane (2023-04-27 11:53:18+00:00): Note that in general, in the US, Trunk is about network connectiveness, so Trunk "spurs" should generally be avoided: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States/2021_Highway_Classification_Guidance
user_5359 (2023-04-21 04:56:21+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Did you have a source for the changed street name? And house doesn‘t have the same name like the street!
archpdx (2023-04-21 04:29:35+00:00): Hi,

Please note that it's good practice to follow the one feature, one OSM element principle (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element). Since this apartment complex has already been mapped as an area, I've removed the point added in this changeset.
jmann6 (2023-04-21 18:05:18+00:00): Hi,

Ah thank you for the link.  Thank you for reverting back and removing the point.  I went ahead and added the currency:XBT and survey date back as requested by the owner.
daperson (2023-04-21 02:49:01+00:00): Correccion: Agregando via y Estructuras
hayes9 (2023-04-21 18:42:26+00:00): Hello Agus K,

Thank you for choosing to contribute to the OSM project. I want to bring to your attention some duplicate features that you've added (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1164312149 & https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1164312148). These features already had ways corresponding to the roads they're meant to represent. When adding route relations, it's best to use the ways that are already present in the data, and to split them as necessary to match the extents you require. Here is some documentation from the OSM Wiki which may help to clarify mapping route relations and the single element policy: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:route#How_to_map ; https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element ; https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway .
murble (2023-10-24 14:07:37+00:00): expressway=yes seems unlikely here. given there is cycling infrastructure etc. what is your reasoning?
ZeLonewolf (2023-10-24 14:43:28+00:00): On the satellite view it looked expressway-like to me, but if you have a better local understanding feel free to adjust it.
silversurfer83 (2023-04-21 07:32:27+00:00): Mohoin :)

Du hast ja selbst in vorherigen Änderungen viel an landuse geändert (völlig zu Recht). Daher hier mein Hinweis, dass ein Flurname an einer Ackerfläche / Wiese eher ungünstig ist, da sich die Fläche gerne mit jeder Luftbildgeneration ändert. Ein Punkt ungefähr in der Flurmitte ist da die bessere Lösung.
Siehe hier https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:place%3Dlocality

Grüße aus dem Waldecker Land
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135174645
Nüsschen (2023-04-21 10:16:12+00:00): Hi, 
genau deswegen hatte ich das auch wieder eingestellt. Das ist ein Kampf gegen Windmühlen. ;-) Dabei hatte ich mich mehr auf die Position der Feldwege konzentriert und die Flächen lediglich in der Position angepasst. 
Genau so mit dem Punkt werde ich das dann auch machen. 
Muss nur nochmal schauen, wie man das elegant löst, wenn ich Fläche in Fläche habe, wie z.B. Waldwiese/Lichtung im Wald. Die habe ich bisher einfach rein gezeichnet. Gehört ja nun auch zum Wald...

vg, Nüsschen
nevw (2023-04-21 09:13:59+00:00): Hi, shop=outpost seems an odd choice to me for an it company. Is this correct?
nevw (2023-04-21 10:04:26+00:00): Maybe office=it would be more suitable for your business   
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:office%3Dit
nevw (2023-04-28 08:41:50+00:00): no response...changed it
Perth IT Care (2023-04-28 08:46:42+00:00): my apologies mate i thought i had replied
nevw (2023-04-28 09:21:54+00:00): That's fine.
The building your business is in is tagged 
amenity=doctors + building=yes + healthcare=doctor
Is that correct or should the doctors part be shifted to a separate node within part of the building?
Perth IT Care (2023-04-28 09:25:57+00:00): Doctors is in a separate part of the building.
nevw (2023-04-28 10:09:28+00:00): Ok, I’ll shift the doctors to a separate node. I’ll leave it for you to put in best spot.
skyper (2023-04-25 19:56:52+00:00): Hi anilkgba,
if you change a two-way street into two one-way street you have to adjust several tags and take care of route relations. I doubt that both one-way parts (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1164325509 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1164325508) have each bicycle lanes on both sides and the bus routes (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15339415 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15339416) for sure use only use one depending on the direction. Again the way members of the bus routes need to be ordered from first to last. Please, fix the issues and be more careful in the future. Thanks.
Regards skyper
deepikja (2023-05-05 20:10:33+00:00): Hi Skyper, 

We apologize for the incomplete edit made by the editor in this change set. We have currently reverted the edits made in the change set 135740097 and will ensure to make dual carriage way modifications only using JOSM so that the existing attributes/relations are not tampered.
Regards,
Deepika
Baloo Uriza (2023-04-21 14:29:01+00:00): Name is not for "OK 127", that's what ref=OK 127 is for.  If it has no name, use noname=yes instead.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135175387
Langlaeufer (2023-04-21 05:33:52+00:00): Hallo Ruegge,

ist der Weg beschildert oder woher weist du wer dort  Zutritt/fahrt hat? bicycle, foot, horse und motor_vehicle gesetzt sieht nicht nach access=unknown aus.  Diese detaillierteren Werte überschreiben das allgemeine access.
Für mich sieht das im Luftbild erstmal wie einer Straße (service) aus. Wenn Kraftfahrzeuge generell ausgesperrt sind nach einem Mehrzweckweg (path). Nur wenn da ein Gehwegschild steht wäre es ein footway.

Grüße Langläufer
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135175627
Langlaeufer (2023-04-21 05:42:35+00:00): Am Weg liegen private Stellflächen bzw. Garagen. Es ist also eine Zufahrt (service). Ich kann in Mapillary auch keine Beschilderung erkennen, die eine öffentliche Nutzung irgend einer Art verbiet. Ich habe es daher den access auf default geändert. Sollte doch irgendein Schild stehen gib bitte Bescheid, dann dokumentieren wir das auch in den Daten.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135175627
user_20113811 (2023-08-25 04:01:55+00:00): you support russian? so why reverting deletions of that language? if russian will rape you relatives how then you will act?
user_20113811 (2023-08-25 04:01:57+00:00): they will find you
user_20113811 (2023-08-25 04:02:05+00:00): For your support of the rapists of children, a worse fate awaits you!
user_20113811 (2023-08-25 04:02:11+00:00): motherfucker!
ovruni (2023-04-21 05:30:09+00:00): Hola PedirkaDesert, he notado que en algunos de sus conjuntos de cambios se estan modificando alineaciones usando la imagen de Esri World Imagery, sin embargo varias de las vias en Perú se encuentran alineadas  con Esri Clarity, como se ha mencionada anterior en la lista de correos. [0] En alusión a modificaciones de otro usuario del equipo de Apple. Proceso a revertir este conjunto de cambios.
Saludos
[0] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-pe/2023-January/000924.html
RiverBearings (2023-04-21 22:34:17+00:00): Hola Ovruni. Gracias por mencionar estos problemas de alineación. Siempre apreciamos cuando la comunidad local se comunica con comentarios que permiten que nuestro mapeo sea más preciso y esté en línea con las preferencias locales y las prácticas de mapeo. Gracias nuevamente por informar a nuestro equipo sobre la preferencia Beta de ESRI World Imagery (Clarity) en Lima y Maxar Premium Imagery en las áreas rurales circundantes en la lista de conversación y en otros lugares. Esto fue un malentendido por parte de algunos miembros del equipo. Quedará claro que solo debemos usar Esri World Imagery Clarity (Beta) y no usar ESRI World Imagery en Lima. Gracias por su ayuda en la revisión de los datos de carreteras recientes en Lima, y háganos saber si tiene más inquietudes.
---
Hello Ovruni. Thank you for bringing up these alignment issues. We always appreciate when the local community reaches out with feeback that allows our mapping to be more accurate and in line with local preferences and mapping practices. Thank you again for making our team aware of the ESRI World Imagery (Clarity) Beta preference in Lima and Maxar Premium Imagery in the surrounding rural areas on the talk list and elsewhere. This was a misunderstanding by some team members. It will be made clear that we are only to use Esri World Imagery Clarity (Beta) and not to use ESRI World Imagery in Lima. Thanks for your assistance in reviewing the recent highway data in Lima, and please let us know if you have any further concerns.
user_6110846 (2023-04-21 05:12:33+00:00): намальовано також дороги між селами
skyper (2023-04-26 12:35:24+00:00): Hello anilkgba,
are there u-turns allowed at the ends of the dual-carriage parts (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10828760928 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6967044714)?
With route relations for both directions like `route=road` or PTv1 bus routes,you need to set the role `forward` for one-way members. I know that the three relations were not ordered correctly prior to your changes but it does not help if you add to that mess.
Please, stop working on the task "Modified road into Dual Carriageway" and talk with your team to update the instructions. And, please, review all your recent changes and fix the problems.
Thanks and best greetings,
skyper
deepikja (2023-05-10 12:39:42+00:00): Hi Skyper, 
The editor refrained from adding the U-turn restrictions in the edit as we were unable to find sign boards indicating U-turn restrictions at the nodes (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10828760928 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6967044714). 
We performed the deep dive as per your recommendations to understand and add the forward/backward roles to be set on 'route=road' or PTv1 bus routes. To understand the procedure to be followed, we looked into the wiki article https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route=bus , but the contents are not very clear.
I'd like to know if we need to set forward/backward roles in such cases given that traffic does not flow in both directions if the roads are divided into dual carriageways and are marked with one-way directionality. We would appreciate if you could share your knowledge with us and we will incorporate it in our internal sop. 
Regards,
Deepika
skyper (2023-05-16 17:44:45+00:00): Hi,
regarding u-turns the road markings are often a good indicator. If there is an restricted area or a solid line u-turns are usually not allowed.

Regarding the roles of two-way route relations like `route=road` or PTv1 bus routes the wiki is correct (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route%3Dbus#Members). Empty role or "route" for members used in both directions and "forward" or "backward" depending on the way's direction for members only used in one direction. Members should be sorted by connectivity which is always possible for `route=road` relations but not for PTv1.

Anyway, I have updated this part of the road with :lanes tagging and have tried to fix the relations (which were a complete mess) in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136179636. Hope this helps to better understand the tagging.
Regards,
skyper
deepikja (2023-05-18 17:45:06+00:00): Hi Skyper,

Thank you for sharing your insights. The suggestions provided by you definitely has helped us understand the tagging. 
We will work on documenting these change sets as examples for our editors which would help them to make a complete edit on OSM without tampering the existing tags/attributes.
Regards,
Deepikja
user_5359 (2023-04-24 07:34:59+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/10828666446. What is the mean of the tag 
nom:en = The Main Gate of Mudeung Station
? Did you mean name:en = The Main Gate of Mudeung Station?
thbz (2023-04-24 09:26:04+00:00): Yes, absolutely! Thanks :-)
ovruni (2023-04-21 05:40:00+00:00): Hola, este conjunto de cambios es similar al anterior, sobre un tema ya explicado con anterioridad al jefe de su equipo.
Saludos
RiverBearings (2023-04-21 22:43:25+00:00): Hola Ovruni. Gracias por mencionar estos problemas de alineación. He respondido al mensaje en https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135176267 con más detalles. Que tenga un buen día.
---
Hello Ovruni. Thank you for bringing up these alignment issues. I've responded to the message on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135176267 with more detial. Have a good day.
silversurfer83 (2023-04-21 07:34:03+00:00): Moin
zu den Gebäudeumrissen:
Soweit ich das verstanden habe versuchen wir in NRW die Umrisse nach Kataster zu zeichnen. Da sind die Dachüberhänge dann nicht drin. Die Katasterkarte kannst du in JOSM auch als Hintergrund einstellen.

Grüße :)
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135177253
wies1 (2023-04-21 08:46:50+00:00): Hallo,
du sprichst sicher NRW Alkis an. Die Karte ist mir bekannt, verwende sie meistens, wenn es um Hausnummern geht. Von einer Art "Vorrang" von Alkis zum Orthophoto ist mir jedenfalls nichts bekannt. Mein Eindruck ist jedoch, dass Orthophoto aktueller bzw. bessere Konturen aufzeigt, als Alkis, 
Daher habe ich Orthophoto verwendet. Diese Karte finde ich übrigens für NRW am besten - so wie in Hessen DOP.
Gruss
wies1
eggie (2023-04-21 07:55:33+00:00): Dag Bert.. Je bijdrage staat niet op een gebouw. Het adres Suze Robertsonstraat 15 is niet hier en de naam is Amsterdam, the Netherlands? 
Ik haal je bijdrage voorlopig weg.
MVG
eggie
Christouf0676 (2024-02-24 09:04:50+00:00): Salut,
Je me permets de supprimer https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1164338618 qui n'existe que (hélas) sur le cadastre... 
Ce jour-là avec le collègue en trail on a pu facilement contourner, mais je ne pense pas que ce soit une bonne idée d'ajouter des chemins sans être sûr qu'ils existent (on ne veut pas se retrouver avec la carte de l'IGN et tous ses chemins virtuels :)
Bon week-end
Hufkratzer (2023-04-21 20:47:34+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1164341885 is probably a riding arena belonging to https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10828850414 (Les Écuries d’Aphrodite). Riding arenas should be tagged leisure=pitch +  sport=equestrian, compare
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:leisure=horse_riding
tordans (2023-04-21 07:28:17+00:00): Siehe auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Supaplex030/Street_parking:_How_to_map_a#Informelles_(geduldetes)_Parken
eggie (2023-04-21 07:44:26+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
silversurfer83 (2023-04-21 07:39:08+00:00): Hi
wenn du landuse anfasst, guck bitte, ob die Flächen vielleicht unnötig an Wegen oder anderen Objekten kleben. Das muss nämlich nicht immer sein. Hier (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10828947929) hängen nämlich 2 landuse und ein Bach (unterirdisch) zusammen. Das sollte so nicht sein.

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135179793
wies1 (2023-04-21 08:49:40+00:00): Hallo,
ich finde es auch besser, wenn Landuses nicht an Wegen hängen. Deswegen habe ich es auch von den Wegen entfernt. Den genauen Punkt, den du zeigst, schaue ich mir gleich nach diesem Kommentar noch an - evtl. habe ich da was übersehen. Auf einen Bach habe bisher diesbezüglich nicht geachtet, nur immer versucht beim Zeichnen des neuen Abschnitts es so zu machen, dass Landuse Linien nicht mit anderen Way Arten zusammenfallen. Wie gesagt, schaue mir den Node gleich an.
Gruss
wies1
wies1 (2023-04-21 09:00:12+00:00): Hallo,
habs gerade gesehen und erledigt. Das hatte ich heute Morgen nicht bemerkt gehabt. Jetzt ist der Bach nicht mehr durch einen Punkt mit den beiden Landuse verbunden. Du hast vollkommen recht, dass man bei Landuse auch darauf achten sollte
Gruss
wies1
silversurfer83 (2023-04-21 11:47:01+00:00): Alles klar :)

hab auch nur zufällig in diese Änderung reingeschaut und warum auch immer ist mir diese Stelle aufgefallen. 

Grüße
silversurfer83
eggie (2023-04-21 07:47:32+00:00): Dag Straattegel.
Gebruikelijk is dat we in OSM gebruikmaken van adresnodes.
Dus niet het adres en bedrijfsinfo op de gebouwomtrek zetten.
Wellicht kun je nog even kijken of dat mogelijk is.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=135179837

MVG
eggie
Straattegel (2023-04-21 11:22:50+00:00): Komt de bedrijfsinfo weer in een aparte node? Of mag die wel bij de adresnode inbegrepen worden?
eggie (2023-04-21 11:32:12+00:00): Je kunt gewoon op de bestaande adresnode bijtaggen als die er nog is.
Anders zelf maar even aanmaken.
Wel nog een officetag toevoegen.
Bv office=company
Anders geen rendering van de naam..
Succes..
eggie
eggie (2023-04-21 11:51:27+00:00): .. maar als het echt de naam van het gebouw is dan kan de gebouwnaam natuurlijk wel op de gebouwomtrek.
FraukeLeo (2023-11-05 16:58:23+00:00): Hi LightSpirit, der tertiary geht bis an die B 260 ran. Ich sehe keinen Grund dafür, die letzten 40 Meter als tertiary_link zu taggen. Wenn nicht aufgeteilt wäre, würde man das ja auch nicht machen. Die Rechtsabbiegerampe dagegen ist ein tertiary_link, die verbindet zwei durchgehende Straßen.