piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2023-03-13 09:38:00+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, during the validation process.

I noticed that you are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.

We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. Just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.

Please map each building accurate over the rooflines.
Default tagging for any building = building=yes. No name tags,
Square each rectangular building with the Q key.

Nodes of buildings may NOT  connect to other buildings or features.

The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 

Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.


See also this document:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/11PsAW0bzUZHbS8YnbaFzqOYhJY7tSPYG/view?usp=share_link


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133614280
Muhmaker (2023-03-14 06:44:52+00:00): Moin. Bist du dir bei den Öffnungszeiten des Sport-Studios hier sicher? Ich kann nicht so ganz glauben, dass es die gleichen sind wie beim Supermarkt.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133614619
silversurfer83 (2023-03-13 15:30:34+00:00): Hallo nach Kassel :)

aus dem Kommentar zur Änderung sowie der fehlenden Quellenangabe zu den Informationen geht leider nicht hervor warum da aus einem Gebäude mit Adresse nun eine Fläche mit Adresse geworden ist.

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133614858
kreuzschnabel (2023-03-13 11:46:40+00:00): Hi gyderstu, in this edit, you declared the entire Harrogare area https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/150872 to be a bandstand and a building :) please carefully select the correct objects before tagging. I just removed the incorrect tags. Thanks!
下り専門 (2023-03-19 06:47:14+00:00): EndlessBeat さん、こんにちは。
静岡市在住の下り専門と申します。
OpenStreetMap へようこそ。編集ありがとうございます。

この編集は「牧野酒造の敷地内にあった複数の建物が解体されて新しい大きな１つの建物ができた」という意図でしょうか？
国土地理院の航空写真やBingの衛星写真ではまだ複数の建物があるように見えました。
現地についてよくご存知でしたら実際にどうなのか教えてください。
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133615097
EndlessBeat (2023-03-27 02:29:38+00:00): こちらには、衛星写真のとおり、現在も複数の建物が敷地内にあります。初心者で編集を誤ったのであれば、以前のバージョンに戻したいと思います。
rskedgell (2023-04-05 23:37:00+00:00): Pity you didn't also notice that the building=yes objects which had name=House were also traced on top of buildings which had already been mapped.
Frans S (2023-03-13 09:25:32+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this task.
A remark. Lots of highways were tagged as residential despite they are in rural area. Please re-tag them into unclassified when you are mapping.

About highway tagging:

Please apply the rules described in this wiki
Most common taggings.
Rural areas : Unclassified,  track , path, service
Urban areas: unclassified, residential, path.


https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highways

Read also the remarks about tagging of tracks in the instructions.
Best regards and keep mapping
Patchanka (2023-03-13 18:34:30+00:00): bonjour
j'ai restauré les voies privées car ce n'est pas parcequ'elles sont privées qu'il faut les supprimer. Il suffit d'ajouter le tag access=private (ce que j'ai fait sur les tronçons concernés)
bonne soirée
andi9876 (2023-04-07 09:54:44+00:00): Hi, please stop add artworks. Remember, it´s public for all users. You can use an app for add private favorites.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-03-13 09:20:29+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10732338079

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Piagno (2025-10-09 20:20:00+00:00): hello, was heisst "tbc" im fixme von Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1153983122
?
habi (2025-10-10 08:00:32+00:00): to be continued?
Piagno (2025-10-11 06:45:39+00:00): ich dachte an "to be continued" oder "to be checked". Bei der Variante continued, hätte ich mich gefragt, in welche Richtung überhaupt verlängert werden soll, da an beiden Enden die Wege bereits weitergezeichnet sind.
Gruemscheler (2025-11-17 08:31:05+00:00): Ja, tbc = to be continued. 
Jetzt scheint Weg alles korrekt und in Ordnung. Danke für "fix me"!
Piagno (2025-11-17 12:28:35+00:00): super, danke der Rückmeldung
vasony (2023-03-23 21:50:05+00:00): Szia!

Győr, Esztergő utca 10/b direkt lett törölve?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/485076671

Tamás
NightH (2023-03-26 12:42:58+00:00): Szia! Igen, lebontották. Gyors-profi munka volt, fog a helyére épülni másik épület. Majd figyelem és felrajzolom, ha elkészül.
vasony (2023-03-26 19:01:07+00:00): OK, akkor visszateszem demolished-nak, így egyértelmű és nem fogják visszarajzolni a műholdkéről ahol még látszik.
Ha elkészült az új majd letörlöd és felrajzolod megint.
NightH (2023-03-26 19:23:02+00:00): Tény, ez így egyértelműbb. Köszi a tippet, legközelebb így járok el.
watmildon (2023-03-13 18:20:22+00:00): This is so much better. Thank you!!
Friendly_Ghost (2023-03-14 10:25:56+00:00): You're welcome. If you look at the history of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/679622365 you see that the aerodrome has been this way for most of the time. Making it a multipolygon was probably a mistake by JB956.
watmildon (2023-03-14 17:24:44+00:00): Yeah. This edit is much cleaner.
eggie (2023-03-13 12:54:14+00:00): Wouter

warnings:crossing_ways:highway-highway

Maak altijd een verbindingsnode op een kruising van wegen. Ik heb het aangepast.
MVG
eggie
WouterEnsing (2023-03-13 19:24:41+00:00): Ah, die had ik niet gezien, sorry. Bedankt voor het corrigeren! Wouter
habi (2023-03-13 10:10:11+00:00): Exgüse for the big changeset, this is a botched search-and-replace in JOSM and was reverted (by myself) in http://revert.osmz.ru/8541
Frans S (2023-03-13 10:49:35+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 
Highway= residential is to be used in  urban areas, like villages, towns etc.
Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133617813
NorthCrab_upload (2023-03-13 10:20:18+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10732430717
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10732430718

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
jslawin (2023-03-13 17:50:07+00:00): Te dwa importowane adresy usunąłem. Też nie wiem skąd wziął się plac zamiast ulicy Jana Kasprowicza. Może Yanosik problem rozwiąże.
NorthCrab (2023-03-14 11:02:15+00:00): Pewnie wystarczy zmienić nazwę ulicy. Bo nie widzę tych numerów w okolicy więc pewnie są poprawne tylko ktoś podał ulice jako plac.
map per (2023-04-11 06:20:24+00:00): Hallo rms_ALG,

laut diesem Hinweis (1) ist die Haltestelle (2) die du eingezeichnet hast vor Ort nicht auffindbar. 

Viele Grüße
map per

(1) https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3636792
(2) https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10732420138
Rainero (2023-04-11 21:54:53+00:00): Die Haltestellen der Busse 190, 191 sind für beide Fahrtrichtungen nördlich der Kreuzung. Der östlichen https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/387515032 fehlt das ref:IFOPT. Da wurde m.E. der Bussteig an der falschen Position kartiert. So ganz scheint de:09162:902:73:73 zu der Numerierung der anderen Haltestellen nicht zu passen, sollte man nochmal prüfen.

Servus,
Rainer
Frans S (2023-03-13 10:46:43+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133618249
SekeRob (2023-03-14 13:31:16+00:00): Hi, is this building for real as not visible in any satellite imagery?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1115975308
You added height=22 and heigt=12. Should that be min_height=12 maybe, which makes it floating, where there are alerts that the building is crossing highways. Maybe add layer=1 if it's on e.g. support pillars.
What is Republique Eperon?
Inunuak (2023-04-06 14:39:08+00:00): Hi, "République-Éperon"  is the name of the two neighborhoods undergoing regeneration.
The building is a truncated parallelepiped (one side H=22, the other side H=12), under construction:
https://clemillet.com/projects/complexe-culturel-et-evenementiel-de-lembarcadere/
It is located right next to the old ferry terminal (Boulogne-sur-Mer-Folkestone), disused, hence the representation of old access roads now condemned.
Inunuak (2023-04-06 14:41:58+00:00): Picture:
https://www.lemoniteur.fr/article/boulogne-sur-mer-l-embarcadere-symbole-de-la-reconquete-de-l-eperon.2253811
Frans S (2023-03-13 10:44:24+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, during the validation process.

I noticed that you are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.

We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. Just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.

Please map each building accurate over the rooflines.

Each rectangular building ought to be squared with the Q key.

Nodes of buildings may NOT  connect to other buildings or features.

The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 

Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.


See also this document:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/11PsAW0bzUZHbS8YnbaFzqOYhJY7tSPYG/view?usp=share_link


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133618707
Frans S (2023-03-13 10:45:22+00:00): About highway tagging:

Please apply the rules described in this wiki
Most common taggings.
Rural areas : Unclassified,  track , path, service
Urban areas: unclassified, residential, path.
Outside villages etc. Unclassified is preferred.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highways

Read also the remarks about tagging of tracks in the instructions.
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133618707
Syarol (2023-03-14 06:29:48+00:00): Що саме ви хотіли додати цією точкою?
Frans S (2023-03-13 10:55:26+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
On this project, mapping of roads and buildings is requested. Nothing else.
Please focus on those and don't waste time on other objects.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133618949
Frans S (2023-03-13 10:52:52+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key.
Don't include a yard in your mapping.
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133619065
Frans S (2023-03-13 10:51:30+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133619107
Ropino (2023-03-24 19:27:59+00:00): Hi, 
please check/correct:
"maxspeed=5080" ? (D 115)
5080 sounds very fast ;)
Thx in advance
Max-Kritic (2023-03-25 19:32:12+00:00): Corrigé
gscholz (2023-03-17 06:37:16+00:00): Hi inciiseen, 
I have reverted this changeset to fix the overlapping ways discussed here:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133620450

Guido
gscholz (2023-03-17 06:37:12+00:00): Hi inciiseen, 
I have reverted this changeset to fix the overlapping ways discussed here:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133620450

Guido
gendy54 (2023-07-22 19:05:12+00:00): Hello,

please don't attach anything to the highway as this makes updating very complicated. for example here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/188246331

Donat
Fizzie-DWG (2023-03-14 03:57:39+00:00): Reverted by DWG due to vandalism: changeset/133648973
DaveF (2023-03-13 13:27:20+00:00): Hi
When creating platforms as polygons could you please add 'area=yes' tag.
This is required to render railway=platforms as infilled grey.
That it currently renders infilled without it is a bug in OSM-Carto's data & will be fixed.
quishpapa (2023-03-13 14:23:11+00:00): Hi DaveF, duly noted. I have added the tag in this loccation, and will include in all future edits to platform stations. Is there a simple bulk process I can use to add the tag to previous platform polygons I have split? (And are there any similar tags / documentation I should be aware of for platforms using lines, not polygons)
DaveF (2023-03-13 17:16:38+00:00): As it involves using Overpass & JOSM, it's easier to do it myself.

There's no special tag requirements for platforms mapped as single lines, but they are better converted to polygons, as you've been doing.
gscholz (2023-03-16 06:44:20+00:00): Hi inciiseen,
this changeset has left behind a lot of errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=28.92929&lat=41.07167&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=133620129

As you may know this kind of errors irritates routing software and looks ugly on the map.

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2023-03-17 06:35:50+00:00): Hi inciiseen, 
due to your missing response I have reverted this changeset to fix those issues.
Guido
NorthCrab_upload (2023-03-13 11:20:21+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9418443363
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1109118252

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, zamień addr:place na addr:city. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1152336563

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
skyper (2023-03-13 18:21:51+00:00): Hallo nagalvad,
und täglich grüßt das Murmeltier. Welche Quellen hast Du verwendet? Etliche Buslinien fahren nun erneut entgegen der Einbahnstraße. Ist das korrekt?
Wie passen die Änderungen zu https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132036902? Siehe auch https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133473551.

Fragende Grüße,
skyper
gscholz (2023-03-16 06:44:54+00:00): Hi inciiseen,
this changeset has left behind a lot of errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=28.92929&lat=41.07167&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=133620450

As you may know this kind of errors irritates routing software and looks ugly on the map.

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2023-03-17 06:35:46+00:00): Hi inciiseen, 
due to your missing response I have reverted this changeset to fix those issues.
Guido
gscholz (2023-03-17 06:37:19+00:00): Hi inciiseen, 
I have reverted this changeset to fix the overlapping ways discussed here:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133620450

Guido
Peter Elderson (2023-03-13 11:53:33+00:00): Note: Micromapping and aligning water/landuse/natural/roads/bridges along my walking route - PDOK, BGT, Survey
Daniel Beran (2023-03-15 08:24:18+00:00): Very nice
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 21:32:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133642636 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6941
Chris Fleming (2024-10-10 08:53:48+00:00): Just noticed that although you realigned the paths; and youer alignment does look better , you missed out some of the features around them, such as the hedges between paths, I will add these to my list to come back to.
eggie (2023-03-13 12:14:58+00:00): Dag Noah.. Waarom access=no
Is het wellicht een bromfietsdoorsteek..
... dan zeker geen motor_vehicle=no.. maar moped=designated. 
Kijk je nog even ?
Mvg
Eggie
eggie (2023-03-13 12:16:10+00:00): De tagging van het fietspad staat op G11..
Her zal niet goe routeren voor bromfietsen.
eggie (2023-03-13 12:43:24+00:00): De tagging en daarmee de routering hersteld. 
access=no is bijna altijd fout.
Het betekent Verboden Toegang.
Waar het G12a fietspad nu stopt haat het G11 fietspad verder.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-03-13 12:51:23+00:00): haat??> gaat...  De overzijde heb ik ook voorzien van een bromfietsdoorsteek.
De juiste tagging op de fietspaden gezet. Het routeert weer.
Groet
eggie
eggie (2023-03-13 12:39:11+00:00): Dag Noah... Dit is helemaal niet isn OSM
Gebouw?

Wat is je bedoeling?
tourism=artwork?  

Dat ontbreekt nu in ieder geval?

MVG
eggie
Глеб (2024-01-25 12:53:16+00:00): Что нагорная?
NorthCrab_upload (2023-03-13 12:10:28+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3237740641
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/448852263

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
mavl (2023-04-25 09:02:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
MxxCon (2023-03-14 05:26:16+00:00): Hello.
Please note that the website address is already encoded in contact:website= tag.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133622473
MxxCon (2023-03-14 05:30:33+00:00): Please note that nytimes building itself is already mapped as a polygon. As documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element it is inappropriate to map the same feature twice.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133622505
rody (2023-03-13 12:20:06+00:00): fictional feature removed
Frans S (2023-03-13 12:26:04+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped.  However, You sometimes included the shadow of a building into a mapped building

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133622861
joana_r (2023-03-13 12:32:44+00:00): Thank you :)
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133622861
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-07 08:23:51+00:00): Cleaned up SEO spam tags for Wilshire Law Firm - Modesto POI in changeset 183768174

https://osm.org/changeset/183768174
bkil (2023-03-13 16:38:48+00:00): Tisztelt szerkesztő! Köszönjük a közreműködést. Szeretném felhívni a figyelmet, hogy az Ede utca és az Ebergény utca sarkát vélhetően véletlenül elmozdította. Ezt most visszahúztam. Kérem jobban ügyeljen erre a jövőben. Amennyiben lehetséges, kérem házszámot is tüntessen fel. https://wiki.osm.org/Hungary/hi
Frans S (2023-03-22 09:27:29+00:00): Issues found on your mappings.
Buildings not accurate mapped. Often the buildings are located within a walled yard. Just map the building(s).
Buildings not squared.
Nodes connected to other buildings and features.
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133623291
Frans S (2023-03-22 09:27:38+00:00): About highway tagging:

Please apply the rules described in this wiki
Most common taggings.
Rural areas : Unclassified,  track , path, service
Urban areas: unclassified, residential, path.


https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highways

Read also the remarks about tagging of tracks in the instructions.
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133623291
balchen (2023-03-17 11:26:34+00:00): Hei.

foot=yes er implisitt på highway=cycleway, generelt sett. Så det trenger vi ikke tagge.

Men på disse enveis-sykkelveiene med fortau dikterer wikien at det skal være foot=no for å vise at dette er ren sykkelvei. Jeg er ikke enig i at det er riktig måte å gjøre det på, men det er status quo. foot=yes er uansett ikke riktig fremgangsmåte.
balchen (2023-03-17 11:39:58+00:00): Tar forøvrig gjerne en prat om OSM og mapping av sykkelveier i Rogaland. Veldig flott at Rogaland FK gjør arbeid her.