piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Bienson (2026-03-12 01:28:23+00:00): Südliche Parkgrenze wieder nach Norden verschoben (siehe Zäune)
Bienson (2026-03-12 01:28:25+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179727956
doms2a (2026-03-13 15:23:46+00:00): oh wow, muss mein Auge fürs Detail wohl noch etwas schärfen. Danke!
NeisBot (2026-03-11 17:11:05+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13637970332 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Pool builder"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-19 17:33:13+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180122413
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
anirud (2026-03-11 10:46:35+00:00): Komentár: Cífer má dve miestne časti: Jarná (tá teraz upravená) a Pác. Myslím, že `place=suburb` je vhodnejšie ako `place=neighborhood`, Pác je tiež označený ako suburb. Moja mapová aplikácia ulice v Jarnej priradila k Jabloncu, ktorého `place` uzol je bližšie ako Cífer. Dúfam, že po tejto úprave ho priradí k suburb, aj všetky budovy teraz majú `addr:suburb=Jarná`.

Čo sa týka alternatívneho názvu, od miestnych som počul iba Gocnog, o "Gocnod" som sa dočítal prvý krát na wikipédii. Viď aj tu: https://www.trnavskyhlas.sk/c/21011-ako-vznikol-nazov-dedinky-jarna-povodny-nevyhovoval-byvalemu-rezimu/
ajmat (2026-03-12 07:56:36+00:00): Reverted in changeset id: 179740075
NeisBot (2026-03-11 16:52:08+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 8 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1487597218 v1 | 8 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179689276
ivanbranco (2026-03-11 22:22:21+00:00): Ciao mariigii123,

non sono sicuro di cosa volessi fare, ma avevi mappato due giganteschi edifici, che non sembrano avere riscontro con la realtà. Per tale motivo ho dovuto ripristinare la situazione precedente.
Wildsharky (2026-03-16 07:29:18+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: 179745941
Jordi MF (2026-03-11 14:56:07+00:00): Por favor, ¿podrías indicar cuál es el uso actual del término "Vijueses"? ¿En qué medios se usa esa denominación de oma habitual y más frecuente que "Vixueses"?
trial (2026-03-11 17:15:02+00:00): Bonjour, je parle de plusieurs modifications récentes, en France on évite de mélange les points d'adresse (par exemple icic à côté le 28) et les points d'intérêt (ici à côté Le Chazelles).
Ça permet de distinguer les deux, d'avoir des statistiques qui tiennent la route, d'avoir une indépendance des deux : le POI peut disparaître alors que le PDA persite), et tant qu'à faire on voir les deux sur la carte. Pour le POI on remplace le préfixe addr: par le préfixe contact: (ou on laisse le géocodage inverse trouver l'adresse).
addr:floor=1, vraiment ? Au vu du site, j'ai plus l'impression que c'est au RdC (0) et non au premier pour l'accueil.
IvanaŠokčević (2026-03-11 14:11:30+00:00): The restriction applies only east of Carolina Road; fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179691506 #OptimoRoute
IvanaŠokčević (2026-03-11 14:12:05+00:00): The restriction applies only east of Carolina Road; fixed in changeset/179691506 #OptimoRoute
mueschel (2026-03-13 13:41:00+00:00): Hi,
you added many tags like "opening_days" or "closing_time". These are not used in any other place. Please check the wiki for the correct usage of "opening_hours":
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours
Wildsharky (2026-03-16 07:25:44+00:00): Reverted in changeset id : 179928086
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-11 12:54:38+00:00): Hi taxi777,

Could you please explain the reason for renaming several streets here from Ukrainian names to Russian ones?

Thanks.
The_Nickname (2026-03-11 12:04:59+00:00): Danke :)
trigpoint (2026-03-11 15:13:04+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/179707075
NeisBot (2026-03-11 17:11:26+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13638092547 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Swimming Pool"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-19 17:33:14+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180122414
(Delete spam tags. First version)
ajmat (2026-03-13 08:20:01+00:00): Reverted in changeset id: 179754516
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-11 12:54:58+00:00): Hi taxi777,

Could you please explain the reason for renaming several streets here from Ukrainian names to Russian ones?

Thanks.
MappingMore (2026-03-12 15:42:52+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:179764118
habi (2026-03-11 12:07:19+00:00): https://web.archive.org/web/20260123114627/https://physiovidmar.ch/ seit 2026.01.01 gecshlossen
MappingMore (2026-03-12 15:51:07+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:179764447
Wildsharky (2026-03-16 07:23:16+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:179927915
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-11 12:55:14+00:00): Hi taxi777,

Could you please explain the reason for renaming several streets here from Ukrainian names to Russian ones?

Thanks.
Wildsharky (2026-03-16 07:22:33+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:179927858
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-16 07:54:18+00:00): @Wildsharky Thanks for fixing the mentioned issue and for commenting here.

Would it be possible to add a direct link to the changeset instead of only the raw changeset ID? Something like https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179927858 would be very helpful.

Thanks!
eggie (2026-03-11 12:25:44+00:00): Dag Nick,

Het adres heb ik weer verwijderd. Dat hoort niet op gebouwomtrekken. Er zijn al adresnodes.

MVG
eggie
MappingMore (2026-03-13 06:26:20+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:179791563
AwFi (2026-03-14 11:15:19+00:00): Ciao, ho visto che in questo e altri changesets hai cambiato operator=Rete Ferroviaria Italiana in operator=RFI. C'è stata una discussione in merito sul forum e si è deciso di fare come standard su OSM di utilizzare il nome intero dell'azienda. Quidi ho effettuato dei changeset in tutta Italia per portare al nuovo tagging tutti gli operator=RFI. iD deve ancora aggiornare queste preferenze (anche se è già stata fatta richiesta) ma nel frattempo potresti gentilmente evitare di riportare le varie relazioni e way ad RFI? Grazie
ajmat (2026-03-13 08:51:07+00:00): Reverted in changeset id: 179768084
Wildsharky (2026-03-16 07:26:33+00:00): Reverted changeset id:179928285
ajmat (2026-03-13 08:49:31+00:00): Reverted in changeset id: 179767893
NeisAgent (2026-03-11 21:02:30+00:00): 🕵 The changeset tags appear to reference Google Maps or another Google mapping service as a data source.

Please note that using Google Maps, Google Street View, or similar Google services as a mapping source is not allowed in OpenStreetMap due to license restrictions.

More information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google

If the data in this changeset was derived from Google Maps or another incompatible source, the edits may need to be reverted.

If this is a misunderstanding and the data was collected from permitted sources (e.g. local survey, Bing imagery, local knowledge, etc.), please clarify in a reply.
eggie (2026-03-11 12:52:27+00:00): Hoi,

Er is natuurlijk altijd wat.
Waar bos is gekapt
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dclearcut
man_made=clearcut
Grote lappen grond waar plannen voor zijn landuse=greenfield
Grote lappen waar niets mee gebeurt.
landuse=brownfield

Veder gewoon kijken wat er groeit.
natural=shrubbery
natural=scrub
natural=grassland  (onbeheerd)
landuse=grass (beheerd) 

Allemaal ergens in de wiki te vinden. 

Groet,
eggie
eggie (2026-03-11 12:54:40+00:00): Een medemapper zal het gewoon weer invullen met bv bos (nav luchtfoto) daarom beter zo'n gebied omtaggen naar iets anders.
clearcut lijkt me dan een duidelijke aanwijzing voorlopig.
ajmat (2026-03-13 08:48:03+00:00): Reverted in changeset id: 179755076
NeisBot (2026-03-11 16:59:11+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 27 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/581281214 v8 | 26 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179698958
Wildsharky (2026-03-16 07:15:41+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:179734278
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-16 07:53:09+00:00): @Wildsharky Thanks for fixing the mentioned issue and for commenting here.

Would it be possible to add a direct link to the changeset instead of only the raw changeset ID? Something like https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179734278
 would be very helpful.

Thanks!
eggie (2026-03-11 12:57:45+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback Beter geen gebouwen gaan splitsen. Het is allemaal ingemeten import vanuit het Kadaster.
Wanneer je dan onderscheid wilt maken teken dan vlakken building:part=...   en zet daat de hoogtes op en het aantal verdiepingen. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-03-11 13:01:55+00:00): Als bovenstaand aangepast. BAG shape hersteld
eggie (2026-03-11 13:07:20+00:00): Tip: Adressen hoeven ook niet op de gebouwomtrek. Er zijn al adresnodes.
JanV1234 (2026-03-11 13:24:01+00:00): Dag Eggie,

Bedankt voor de feedback. Ik heb zelf in het verleden veel aanpassingen aan de BAG gedaan (in opdracht van overheden), dus ik weet dat ze lang niet altijd kloppen. Maar ik snap dat OpenStreetMap de BAG wil blijven hanteren, dat zal ik in het vervolg dus ook niet meer muteren. Ik zal vlakken gebruiken (wat je aangaf), indien van toepassing. 

mvg,
Jan
eggie (2026-03-11 13:36:21+00:00): Dag Jan,
Het is meer het punt dat bij periodieke updates je mutaties aan de BAGdata worden overschreven .
Wanneer echt iets niet klopt kun je een terugmelding doen richting BAG.
Splitsen zullen niet snel doen.
Veel startende mappers kijken ook naar de daken. Dan gaat het in ieder geval fout met schuingenomen luchtfoto's.
Veel plezier met mappen.
eggie
NeisBot (2026-03-11 17:12:09+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13638364710 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Office building"

#MapWithoutSpam
Maclean Of Duart Enterprises (2026-03-11 17:17:22+00:00): I have included the most accurate description. The possible choices should be updated so as to include IT support and website development. If the description is to be updated then it can be updated to simply say IT support.
goldfndr (2026-03-12 18:50:48+00:00): 68 trees
infeeeee (2026-03-12 13:00:33+00:00): Szia!

Vöröstó német neve szerepel a városhatár táblán? KSH szerint nem, de régi mapillaryn hátulról látok valami kiegészítő táblát.

Ha nem szerepel akkor inkább old_name:de-be kéne írni, ha szerepel akkor mellérakni egy source:name:de=sign címkét, ez volt a német szerkesztők kérése: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multilingual_names#Hungary

Vagy itt csak a MK adatokból foglalkoztál a táblákkal, és ott a feliratok nincsenek meg.
BáthoryPéter (2026-03-12 13:15:51+00:00): Alapvetően a táblákkal foglalkoztam, csak feltűnt, hogy fura a német név. A schwaben.hu alapján javítottam, bár most ahogy megint rákerestem, a Wikipédián van még Wereschthul is. Nem tudom melyik a jó, vagy melyik név melyik tagbe lenne való. Ha hozzád közelebb áll a terület, javítsd belátásod szerint.
infeeeee (2026-03-12 13:24:59+00:00): Megyek végig a német nevű településeken, és javítgatom őket. De nincs jó forrás, KSH-nak van egy listája: https://www.ksh.hu/apps/hntr.nemzetisegi 
de eléggé hiányos, nem egyet találtam, ahol ki van írva a név, de a listában nem szerepelt. Ami nincs benne a listában ott csak a fizikai tábla segíthet, és itt nem látok erről fotót sehol, reméltem, hogy valamilyen fotó vagy felmérés alapján javítottad a nevet.

Olyat már találtam, ahol hibás volt a német név: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1156212429
Wildsharky (2026-03-16 07:19:10+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:179753618
Wildsharky (2026-03-16 07:21:34+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:179754032
ticho2 (2026-03-16 10:00:21+00:00): Ak je ten chodnik "paved" (podla nastaveneho povrchu), urcite je iba neformalny? Nehodilo by sa tam viac highway=footway?
Duški Kubov (2026-03-16 13:14:30+00:00): Za mňa nejde o oficiálny chodník, pretože ide o zakopané betonóvé podvaly, ktoré si pravdepodobne miestny obyvatelia vytvorili samovoľne. Je zreteľné, že sa kontrastne líši od oficiálnych samostatných chodníkov.
ticho2 (2026-03-16 16:11:30+00:00): Ok, to beriem, ja som siel len podla toho "paved". :)

Ak tie podvaly netvoria suvisly povrch ale su medzi nimi medzery, mozno by stalo za to zvazit surface=stepping_stones. Ak suvisle su, tak surface=concrete.

"paved" by sa malo pouzivat len ak sa fakt nic ine nehodi, vid https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:surface#Common_values
iandees (2026-03-11 13:52:10+00:00): Hi! It looks like a node in this changeset was accidentally moved. This can happen when panning the map. The node has been moved back to its previous position.
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-11 19:14:58+00:00): Should be reviewed.
Taya_S (2026-03-12 05:23:11+00:00): Reverted politically motivated edit

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179733370
MappingMore (2026-03-12 15:45:41+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:179764255
NeisBot (2026-03-11 17:12:29+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13630990882 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Flea market"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-19 17:33:15+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180122417
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
Wildsharky (2026-03-16 07:20:05+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:179753818
eggie (2026-03-11 13:51:29+00:00): Lijkt me oke..  Wanneer je toch gewend bent om zaken aan te passen zoals aan de BAG kun je beter met editor JOSM verder gaan.
Een aanrader.

editor josm stap voor stap
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/editor-josm-stap-voor-stap/75047

BGT implementeren 
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59021
Forumdraadje ..  De beste imagery layers om NL OSM te mappen met JOSM.
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/de-beste-imagery-layers-om-nl-osm-te-mappen-met-josm/85393

Mapse
mueschel (2026-03-12 11:43:41+00:00): Please stop creating new accounts and importing your POIs one-by-one. Please read and obey the guidelines for imports and professional editing:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/6/62/Organised_Editing_Guidelines.pdf
eggie (2026-03-11 13:44:42+00:00): Dag tyll. Dit is helaas niet correct. Dit stuk is geen fietspad.
Het is een fietsstraat en dient om leerlingen van de school af te zetten met de bekende busjes.
Er staat ook een L51 bord. 

Wat is je bron in deze?
Voorlopig draai ik het weer terug.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-03-11 13:47:16+00:00): reverted by changeset #179702990 due to wrong interpretation cyclestreet. 
Mocht dit onlangs veranderd zijn dan hoor ik dat graag.
MVG
eggie
tyil (2026-03-13 06:55:00+00:00): Ik was er langsgelopen, en zag aan beide kanten alleen een fietspad bord staan, en de bekende markeringen voor fietsbanen. Ik ben er net nog eens langsgelopen, en er staan inderdaad voor dat stukje L51 borden. Dit is dus een "gewone" weg in OSM? Ik had verwacht dat dit, gezien het voornamelijk voor fietsers is, dat het logischer is om dit als fietspad te noteren, ipv een weg voor autos.
eggie (2026-03-13 07:18:52+00:00): Hoi.. Het is ook wonderlijk. De busjes kunnen anders na afzetten van de leerlingen niet draaien. Dus 's morgens en 's middags draaien die busjes weer terug naar het terrein.
Een fietsstraat is dan inderdaad geen fietspad, maar bv een unclassified.
Zie wiki.
Groet,
eggie
eggie (2026-03-13 07:22:18+00:00): Wiki...
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Key:cyclestreet
eggie (2026-03-13 07:24:15+00:00): Je kunt er alleen maar komen via het schoolterrein. Tja wonderlijke oplossing
NeisBot (2026-03-11 17:12:51+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13629974951 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Construction supply warehouse"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-19 17:33:19+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180122420
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
yelisey90 (2026-03-11 17:21:01+00:00): rv - both companies are already mapped; please don't use custom tag values. building=commercial is valid, building=ქვის_მაღაზია is not; surface is used for roads & paths, like surface=asphalt

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179714570
infeeeee (2026-03-12 14:27:22+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

On the wiki there is a very good article about how names should be tagged: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names Please read and understand this.

We have several different kind of name tags, use them! I see in your latter edits you found you can write to name:en instead of alt_name. 

Please be more careful with spelling and capitalization.

It doesn't make a lot of sense to list different spellings of the same word, r.g. coffee and café. These kind of variations should be handled by map users, apps, we shouldn't add them to the database.

I fixed most of your edits here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179760778

Happy mapping!
fortera_au (2026-03-12 21:10:40+00:00): Hi, these two roads should be joined up as this is a petrol station, the building in between them is just a roof.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179701792
NeisBot (2026-03-11 17:13:08+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13638513499 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Verkooppunten"
---
Bijvoorbeeld, een meer neutrale en feitelijke versie van je tekst kon zijn: "Verkooppunten"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
juulCoding04 (2026-03-12 16:12:09+00:00): I removed the detailed description to keep OSM neutral
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-12 16:33:53+00:00): 👍 Thank you @juulCoding04
Wildsharky (2026-03-16 07:17:18+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:179799165
Frans S (2026-03-30 12:30:40+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
I am sorry to say that clustering buildings is not allowed. Each building needs to be mapped individually.
Best regards
Frans S (2026-03-30 12:49:05+00:00): Check this webpage to see what changes I had to make.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=180628085

Best regards
eggie (2026-03-11 13:52:53+00:00): Lijkt me oke zo.
NeisBot (2026-03-11 17:13:19+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13620535379 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Auto parts store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-19 17:33:20+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180122426
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
kingkingHK (2026-03-13 09:53:45+00:00): Don't know what you are doing drawing buildings that already exist

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179800230
divaddivag (2026-03-12 09:09:49+00:00): Salut Nathan, merci de maintenir toutes ces infos à jour. Je basculerais les parking_space en way avec la nouvelle imagerie. En attendant pour les bornes qui demandent confirmation, ex. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12222677248, fais une liste/carte uMap et je verrais pour le faire le terrain comme dans le passé sur Bayeux.  Cheers! David
NathanBnm (2026-03-12 09:13:35+00:00): Merci pour ton retour. Comme le réseau MobiSDEC a changé d'opérateur cette année je suis en plein chantier de mise à jour des bornes existantes/intégration des nouvelles bornes si c'est possible.
Je ne manquerai pas de revenir vers toi avec la liste/carte des bornes qu'il me manque une fois que j'aurai terminé ;)