piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2026-04-10 07:21:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13720174189 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Jewelry store"

#MapWithoutSpam
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-11 13:05:29+00:00): Hi PostalPhil, willkommen bei OSM.

Ist dort wirklich wieder keine Geschwindigkeitsbegrenzung? Sieht bei dem Autobahnkreuz ein wenig nach "Abenteuer" aus ... :)

Viele Grüße
PostalPhil (2026-04-11 13:25:55+00:00): Ich kann's dir gerade nicht bildlich nachweisen, aber ja, ist aufgehoben, sogar nur Richtgeschwindigkeit. Dschörmenie at it's best :D wer die Idee hatte weiß ich nicht. Auch auf der Gegenspur kurz vor Abfahrt Würselen vom Eschweiler rein ist weit bis in die Abfahrt scheinbar noch unbegrenzt, so zumindest könnte man es interpretieren, denn das Schild scheint mit der Begrenzung auf 100 könnte durchaus auch nur für das Teilstück weiter nach Richterich und Heerlen gelten. 
Aus Aachen raus Richtung Eschweiler ist aber ab Ausfahrt Würselen tatsächlich schon Achterbahn. Ich mach Montag mal ein Foto oder ein kleines Video davon.
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-11 13:28:28+00:00): Danke für die Antwort.

Gute Fahrt!
HueMan1 (2026-04-11 01:21:25+00:00): now you're just making things up. Tibagan Woods? never heard of it. Calumpang Bypass Road? you can't just name segments of different roads as a single bypass road. Only the Bancod–Calumpang Cerca is named, and it is Gusi Peace Price International Avenue.
That Wa'er (2026-04-17 14:10:09+00:00): to be honest i only found about comments now i am just calling roads from the street signs because i do drive here often, although I could be wrong about these as it is only named these in roadside addresses and small tarp signs
Taksine (2026-04-10 07:39:34+00:00): 已经注意到原来画的与卫星图已经严重不符，该编辑者绘画并非是破坏行为，只是画的太糙，我目前很难处理这一带。
残阳逐流 (2026-04-21 20:35:45+00:00): 那个叫哈基米娜美路多的干什么了
eggie (2026-04-10 07:50:56+00:00): Dag Rocksint,

Beetje arbitrair hier, want het is een busbaan. 
Een bus 'mag' niet sneller dan 100, maar staat dat hier ook aangegeven? Ik denk zomaar van niet.

Met opritten is sowieso iets merwaardigs aan de hand. Die vallen niet onder de maxspeed van de bebording van de snelweg zelf.

MVG
eggie
Rocksint (2026-04-10 08:10:34+00:00): Hallo Eggie,
Ik werk bij de RAV MWN, wij merken in het navigatiesysteem dat deze oprit regelmatig problemen geeft. Andere afrit op dit punt geeft minder problemen daar stond al wel max 100km daarom wilde ik dat bij deze afslag ook proberen.
Ons navigatiesysteem maakt gebruik van de kaarten van OSM.
Vandaar dat ik hier ook op ben gekomen.
MVG
Rocksint
eggie (2026-04-10 08:15:47+00:00): Wanneer het niet routeert dan zou je emergency=yes kunnen toevoegen ... zowel aan de slagboom als aan het wegdeel.
Er is hier acecss=no toegevoegd.. Dat hoeft eigenlijk niet, want dat is default op een busbaan.
emergency=yes is een default, maar wellicht strooit dat access=no roet in het eten.
Wat is het probleem hier?

MVG
eggie
Rocksint (2026-04-10 08:22:41+00:00): Vaak stuurt het navigatiesysteem de ambulances over de Rondweg terwijl via de busoprit een stuk sneller is. En dat krijgen we er niet echt uit, dus vandaar dat ik hier in OSM ging kijken. 
Fijn dat je wil meekijken!
Ga de Emergency=yes proberen aan te zetten
Rocksint (2026-04-10 08:29:03+00:00): Volgens mij is het gelukt, andere kant ook meegenomen.
eggie (2026-04-10 08:45:37+00:00): Ik kan niet in de scripts kijken van de routingapps... LiveNav?
Meestal is emergency=yes of designated nodig.
, maar als access=emergency helpt oke.
Rocksint (2026-04-10 08:51:18+00:00): Ik weet het niet, nog niet kunnen proberen of dit werkt.
Ik kon de optie emergency=yes niet vinden alleen de acces
Navigatie die we gebruiken is SafetyCT
Rocksint (2026-04-10 08:54:21+00:00): Ik weet ook niet hoe snel de updates van OSM door komen in onze systemen
Rocksint (2026-04-10 08:58:39+00:00): Nu wel gevonden, hopen dat het gaat werken.
eggie (2026-04-10 08:59:45+00:00): Hier de wiki mbt hulpdiensten
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Hulpdiensten

(* Met emergency=yes geef je aan dat een weg of pad ook voor hulpdiensten toegankelijk is

Je kunt die regel zelf toevoegen met editor iD.
NeisBot (2026-04-10 07:46:27+00:00): 🌍 OSM에 오신 것을 환영합니다, ninjabunny.
기여해 주셔서 감사합니다!

他の 사용자들과의 협력을 쉽게 하기 위해, 그리고 다른 사람들이 귀하의 편집을 이해할 수 있도록, 변경한 내용에 대한 짧은 설명을 추가하는 것이 좋습니다. 분명한 댓글은 커뮤니티가 귀하의 작업을 따라가고 더 나은 피드백을 제공하는 데 도움이 됩니다. 좋은 댓글 작성 방법에 대한 팁은 여기[1]에서 찾을 수 있습니다.

✅ 여기에 지도 편집 내용을 기반으로 한 샘플 댓글이 있습니다: "싱글벙글세탁소라는 이름의 세탁소를 추가했습니다"
(Auto-translation)
---
🌍 Welcome to OSM, ninjabunny.
Thanks for contributing!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

✅ Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added laundry shop named 싱글벙글세탁소"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment
MarkusHD (2026-04-10 07:48:52+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4827713
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-06-11 06:41:24+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5339321 - that is not a florist anymore, right?
epigen108 (2026-04-27 17:56:09+00:00): Vielen Dank für das Mapping, aber https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5235462 ist immer noch offen?
qugeb (2026-04-27 18:17:59+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. Offenbar funktioniert das JOSM-Plugin nicht zuverlässig. Ich habe die note manuell geschlossen
eggie (2026-04-10 09:02:49+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Marsie99 (2026-04-10 10:28:09+00:00): Ik heb de locatie iets veranderd. Het bankje staat reeds op alle bankjes.nl door iemand anders. Maar hij staat voordat de brug begint aan de zuidkant aan de oever.
eggie (2026-04-10 10:38:38+00:00): Oke.. top!
ChrissW-R1 (2026-04-10 19:26:43+00:00): Please check https://osm.org/note/5244296
rskedgell (2026-06-04 21:43:43+00:00): Please don't add incorrect layer=1 tags to objects simply in order to hide an editor warning. It makes it harder for to find and fix the problem later.
Aparna Manjery (2026-06-05 06:29:15+00:00): Hi rskedgell,
Thank you for your feedback! Noted, the layer tag was added by mistake and will be avoided going forward. I can see that layer=1 tag has been applied to the adjacent segments on your end. Could you clarify whether those should be removed, or if they were added intentionally for a specific reason?
rskedgell (2026-06-05 09:05:30+00:00): All of the layer tags in this area are incorrect and should NOT have been added. Any remaining from me splitting sidewalks in StreetComplete (which doesn't let me directly edit tags) will be removed shortly.

In general, if a sidewalk should have layer=1 it will also be on a bridge and both the road and sidewalk will also be tagged with bridge=yes

Similarly, sidewalks with layer=-1 are in tunnels and both the road and the sidewalk and the road will also be tagged with tunnel=yes (but not normally tunnel=building_passage).

The reason the iD and Rapid editors display a warning about highways and buildings crossing is so that the problem can be fixed. Simply adding a layer=* tag doesn't solve the problem.

The problem with these errors and the current Uber editing in general is that you're being paid to do this. I am not being paid to fix errors which cause me real life inconvenience. It now appears that I am expected to deliver the training which you should have received before you made your first edit, again without being paid. I doubt that you can fully understand the magnitude of my burning resentment.
rskedgell (2026-06-05 09:16:19+00:00): I've removed all of your incorrect layer=* tags in Greater London in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183684492 - I shouldn't have needed to do this.
Aparna Manjery (2026-06-05 09:43:23+00:00): Hi
Thank you for your edits and for the detailed explanation on layer tags, it's very helpful! We want to provide some context: the OSM community had flagged few issues about 2 months ago, and since then we've been actively working on revising our internal processes. The edits in question predate that period, so they reflect our older approach. Going forward, we'll ensure the correct layer tags are applied consistently. We appreciate your patience and continued feedback!
rskedgell (2026-06-15 13:19:32+00:00): I'd rather your team fixed *all* of the previous mapping before doing any more.
Aparna Manjery (2026-06-16 02:27:46+00:00): Hi rskedgell
We are not currently editing in London, UK, and we stopped editing there on 26 May 2026. We will review the mapping concerns that have been raised before making any further changes.
notmyproblem1 (2026-05-06 10:36:05+00:00): Salve,

ho visto che ha mappato il cartello stradale dei 50 kmh in mezzo a un incrocio (nodo: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/251994885) 

Dopo un mio survey su strada, sembra che non ci sia codesto segnale stradale 

Ecco il mio survey:
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1513653543581722&focus=photo&lat=44.2287687&lng=10.1170133&z=17

Mi faccia sapere se si trattava di un errore, e se lo cancellə ləi o io

=D
Susymala (2026-05-07 06:31:45+00:00): Corretto
HellMap (2026-04-12 10:25:02+00:00): Like mentioned before, please stop adding misaligned, overlapping AI building without actually manually checking them.
iandees (2026-04-10 14:30:33+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1833972025 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181150822, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-10 18:32:58+00:00): Partly reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181143575
george1201 (2026-04-10 18:11:59+00:00): Hallo, 
den tag network hast du zwar nicht geändert, aber ich möchte hierzu nach deiner Meinung fragen. 
Hier war mal network=cambio_stadtmobil eingetragen. Das hatte ich kürzlich zu "Stadtmobil Karlsruhe" geändert, weil ich es so an anderen Stationen gefunden habe. Auch du hast bei n483000758 in Ettlingen vor 2 Jahren diesen network-Wert eingetragen. 
Was ist richtig?
C_1965 (2026-04-10 18:28:39+00:00): Hallo
ich habe nie genau über diesen Tag nachgedacht, vermutlich nur von ähnlichen Stationen kopiert...

Wenn ich https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:network?uselang=de lese, dann finde ich folgendes richtig: Ich bin Kunde von operator=stadtmobil, kann damit aber auch Autos mieten im deutschlandweiten network=cambio_stadtmobil 

Jedenfalls so auch: https://www.cambio-carsharing.de/partnerstaedte

Oder? Wie gesagt, ich denke gerade jetzt erst darüber nach.

Gruß Christoph
C_1965 (2026-04-10 18:40:39+00:00): Wobei, ich weiß nicht wie kompliziert es eigentlich ist. Ich bin Mitglied bei "Stadtmobil CarSharing GmbH & Co. KG" in Karlsruhe, kann aber nur oder erst über eine Quernutzung andere Carsharing Stationen in Deutschland nutzen?!
george1201 (2026-04-10 18:49:40+00:00): Auf der Cambio-Website wird Stadtmobil KA als Partner aufgeführt. Umgekehrt fand ich aber nichts. Aber wenn es diese beidseitige Partnerschaft gäbe, dann wäre cambio_stadtmobil der richtige network-Wert. Dann müsste man alle Karlsruher Stationen umtaggen (die ich erst kürzlich vereinheitlicht hatte).
Gruß, Helmut
george1201 (2026-04-10 18:55:11+00:00): Ich lese: Ein Cambio-Kunde kann auch Stadtmobil nutzen.
Ich frage: Gilt es auch umgekehrt?
C_1965 (2026-04-11 08:58:07+00:00): Nach ein wenig weiterer Wikipedia Lektüre würde ich an dem Tagging hier nichts ändern.
brand=Stadtmobil
brand:wikidata=Q2327629
network=Stadtmobil Karlsruhe
operator=Stadtmobil CarSharing GmbH & Co. KG
Das erscheint mir zutreffend.

Zu Deiner Frage zur Quernutzung. Als Mitglied von Stadtmobil Karlsruhe kann ich bei recht verschiedenen anderen und ähnlichen stationsbasierten Carsharing-Unternehmen Autos leihen: etwa naturenergie sharing GmbH in Freiburg oder cambio CarSharing in Aachen.

Die Carsharing Bewegung ist wohl lokal recht unterschiedlich entstanden. Carsharing in Karlsruhe gehört aber wohl in erster Linie zu Stadtmobil (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stadtmobil), nicht zu Cambio. Da muss ich mich korrigieren.
Gruß Christoph
george1201 (2026-04-11 22:34:32+00:00): Wenn hier network="Stadtmobil Karlsruhe" richtig wäre, dann wäre  network=cambio_stadtmobil, was ich an verschiedenen Stationen in Ettlingen finde, also falsch?
C_1965 (2026-04-14 13:09:20+00:00): Nicht falsch, aber... cambio und Stadtmobil kooperieren auf jeden Fall, zumindest kann ich in meiner App Fahrzeuge von cambio buchen. Genaugenommen aber nur cambio Deutschland, nicht cambio Belgien.

Mittlerweile finde ich es ein hoffnungsloses Unterfangen, das Netzwerk der stationsbasierten Anbieter mit einem Tag network= beschreiben zu wollen. Eine Übersicht für die Partner von Stadtmobil Karlsruhe finde ich nicht, dafür habe ich hier eine Liste bei cambio (https://www.cambio-carsharing.de/partnerstaedte) für vielen Partnerunternehmen.

Es geht auch noch lustig weiter. Als Kunde von Stadtmobil Karlsruhe kann ich in Halle/Saale bei teilAuto ein Fahrzeug buchen. teilAuto ist wiederum (nach Eigendarstellung) im Netzwerk von Flinkster. Was aber nicht heißt, dass ich als Kunde von Stadtmobil Karlsruhe sonst irgendwo auch Autos bei Flinkster bekomme.

Vielleicht gehe ich mal zu Stadtmobil KA und lasse mir ihr Netzwerk erklären. Aber einen einheitlichen Namen für ein einheitliches Netzwerk sehe ich nicht. Das sind vermutlich viele einzelne Verträge zwischen den Gesellschaften von Stadtmobil, cambio, naturenergie sharing, teilAuto und wie sie in jeder Stadt heißen mögen.

Vorläufig bin ich hier raus, und mache mit keinen Kopf um den Tag.
george1201 (2026-04-15 20:37:40+00:00): Danke für die ausführliche Erläuterung. Ich nehme mit: Es ist kompliziert. Ob richtig oder falsch, in KA haben zumindest jetzt alle Stationen den gleichen network-Namen. Und deutschlandweit scheint das Schema "Stadtmobil <Stadt/Region>" zu überwiegen.
Beenden wir also das Thema und wenden uns lieber anderen Dingen zu.
evgenykatyshev (2026-04-10 08:11:47+00:00): To be reverted. Every Door duplicated edit again
evgenykatyshev (2026-04-12 12:42:43+00:00): Done
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-10 18:32:16+00:00): Partly reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181143575
rarad74 (2026-04-13 08:12:33+00:00): Hi. Based on what info?
rskedgell (2026-04-10 10:12:52+00:00): Could you explain why Uber thinks that pedestrians in London will benefit from the addition of a disconnected (and therefore unavailable for routing) sidewalk like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1498140332
Anusha Kodi (2026-04-17 02:44:57+00:00): Apologies for the mistake I committed. Going forward will take care. Thank you for the valuable feedback. Thank you.
gurglypipe (2026-04-11 08:23:13+00:00): Hiya, this change covers half of England. It’s better to keep edits small and local if possible. What features are you removing from trails, and why? Thanks :)
Dawesy (2026-04-12 12:47:16+00:00): I do normally keep edits to more local areas but 1/2 way through this I was asked a question about Fountains Abbey so jumped a round a little. The edits are to remove car parks, cafe's, toilets from Trail relations, as they cause errors on routing etc. The were captured as part of an organised exercise and I spend about a hour a week removing them as I couldn't find a good way to automate it.
gurglypipe (2026-04-16 09:30:46+00:00): If they were included in the relation using an appropriate role for the member then I don't see a reason to remove them. What errors were being seen and in what app?

From a quick look these all look like National Trust walking routes, and I believe they want to highlight the recommended toilets, car park, etc. for each walk.
gurglypipe (2026-04-24 19:43:26+00:00): I’m minded to revert this change as you’re removing useful information from the map for (presumably?) the sake of one data consumer. Although without answers to the questions above it’s hard to be sure.
Dawesy (2026-04-25 08:39:15+00:00): Please don't do that. I am working with the National Trust Path and Trails Team https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities/National_Trust_Paths that added this information and it is causing issues. Specifically it cause the GPX files to be useless from https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/
The information may be useful to explicitly link facilities to trails but how it is set-up is not useful.
gurglypipe (2026-04-26 16:55:16+00:00): So what’s the plan for fixing the information so it is useful and doesn’t break waymarkedtrails.org?
Dawesy (2026-05-14 08:45:13+00:00): We are currently reviewing how to best represent this information, I believe you were part of the conversation last year as how the Parking role etc. could be used. Our understanding is that this has not been adopted as a standard tag. 
I think this is an area where more work is required, but for now we are not supporting these facilities as part of the trail relate. 
How do you think we should promote this concept as part of the OSM UK community?
gurglypipe (2026-05-14 11:14:23+00:00): > Our understanding is that this has not been adopted as a standard tag. 

The `parking` role is documented as a de-facto standard tag for route=hiking relations on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route%3Dhiking

There aren’t currently role values for cafes or toilets as far as I know. Have you proposed them somewhere? That would be the next step. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal_process

> How do you think we should promote this concept as part of the OSM UK community? 

Before going through the formal proposal process for new role values, you could start a discussion on the UK forums (https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/uk/86) to gather informal feedback and ideas, which would help in putting together a good formal proposal for new roles.

---

However, it looks to me like role values were never actually used for parking, cafes, toilets, etc. when in these relations (i.e. before this changeset), which would explain why there were routing errors. As per the documentation for hiking routes (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route%3Dhiking#Roles), only the main sections of a route (i.e. the path) should have no role in the relation. All other members of the relation should  have a suitable role. So the car parks which were previously in the route relations should have had role `parking` but didn’t. That will have been causing things like hiking.waymarkedtrails.org to try and interpret them as part of the path rather than as parking.

So, I suspect it should be safe to re-add the car parks to the route relations *with the `parking` role set correctly*, and in parallel pursue a proposal for role values for toilets and cafes etc.

Hope that makes sense, sorry it’s a long reply; I think there are several issues at play here.
Alliegaytor (2026-04-10 10:17:22+00:00): Your check_date is in the future. Is this meant to be the opening_date?
LachlanTansey2009 (2026-04-10 12:05:47+00:00): Yes, thats my mistake thank you for pointing that out.
Marek-M (2026-04-13 11:53:26+00:00): Cześć, dzięki za dobre edycje z terenu. Tutaj usunąłeś dość długą drogę, która za tym wąwozem prawdopodobnie jednak istnieje - na to wskazuje podkład z cieniowaniem terenu ISOK. Poprawiłem Twoją edycję i skorygowałem usunięta ścieżkę a także dodałem strumyki w lesie oraz poprawiłem geometrię niektórych dróg na podstawie podkładu ISOK. Tutaj moja poprawka:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=181272147&relations=false
NeisBot (2026-04-10 08:42:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13720282227 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Restoration office"

#MapWithoutSpam
bxl-forever (2026-04-10 08:41:52+00:00): The following changesets have been reverted:
181129123
181129467
181129534
181129600
181129652
181129897
181130021
181130201
181130271
181130571
181131142
181131250
181131287
181131450
181131679
NeisRevert (2026-04-11 13:18:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/181188996
where the comment is: "Undo mass deletion"
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-11 13:18:49+00:00): Bitte die folgende Webseite anschauen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F

Danke und viele Grüße
lonvia (2026-04-13 19:56:37+00:00): Du hast hier mit deinen Änderungen aus Versehen ein Stück der Elbe entsorgt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29435179/history#map=15/50.89238/14.24550
Ropino (2026-04-14 04:59:27+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis,
Die Elbe fließt jetzt wieder in voller Breite.
kingkingHK (2026-04-11 03:28:24+00:00): Hi there, is there a reason you removed `destination=` from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/494473889 ? I will restore it if it is simply an editing mistake. Thanks!
vectorial8192 (2026-04-11 07:30:37+00:00): You quoted a way; notice the previous way of the quoted way already has destination info. My understanding is that as long as we have "passed" a junction, we may omit destination info.
kingkingHK (2026-04-11 08:17:06+00:00): I am not super familiar with how data consumers handle  destination tagging, but I quote https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:destination?uselang=en-GB#Destinations_per_road

> At least the first section of a road leaving the intersection must be tagged, however the tagging can continue on further segments until some different destination is signposted. This allows navigation software to show continuously which destination a driver is following.
vectorial8192 (2026-04-11 16:55:42+00:00): The description technically allows my changeset, but I can see this is an implied rule to keep the destination value.
vectorial8192 (2026-04-11 17:02:15+00:00): Destination improved with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181199461
kingkingHK (2026-04-12 03:43:05+00:00): Btw I redid the trees in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181213545 ; it seems like you were looking at outdated imagery before some trees were cut.

While Esri Clarity Beta is the most accurate when it comes to geometry, it is 10 years old. I would not recommend using it for features which may have changed, or features where absolute accuracy is not important.
vectorial8192 (2026-04-12 04:02:49+00:00): I was thinking maybe the trees would not change much, but I guess I was wrong.
kingkingHK (2026-04-12 04:12:45+00:00): If you ask me, I would say trees are one of the fastest-changing things...
ChrissW-R1 (2026-04-11 19:39:17+00:00): Please check https://osm.org/note/5245934