piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
kwiatek_123 (2023-10-05 20:09:55+00:00): ale to też subiektywna opinia
jodd (2023-10-05 18:20:23+00:00): Kommentar hätte sein sollen:

Haltestellenrelation angelegt, nicht vorhandenen Bahnsteig an Bushaltestelle gelöscht
Herwescheluc (2023-10-16 06:23:14+00:00): Hallo Foo223! Bitte die Quelle für diese Adresse angeben, da die nicht in der Liegenschaftskarte oder sonstwo zu finden ist und nur bei google-maps nachweisbar ist gehört die sonst gelöscht! Gruß Andreas
Rogoyski (2023-10-05 21:39:23+00:00): Lepiej niż kasować jest oznaczyć punkt jako disused:amenity=pub (zwłaszcza, gdy wciąż są szyldy i inne oznaczenia) albo shop=vacant.
Langlaeufer (2023-10-05 20:07:38+00:00): Da du den Weg ja anscheinend auch noch als radweg ansiehst hab mal cycleway=separate gesetzt. Im Süden stand letztes Jahr auch noch ein "Radverkehr frei"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142201860
GeoAndi (2023-10-05 19:16:55+00:00): Quelle Tagging: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Street_parking#Park-_und_Halteverbote
bxl-forever (2023-10-06 07:34:00+00:00): This edit looks fairly suspicious.

The "attraction" in the middle of a forest and the "restaurant" on a parking lane in Brugge are clearly wrong.  Not sure about the camping site inside a Gentse park, it can probably be reverted too.
ValidDistress (2023-11-03 17:21:11+00:00): There is indeed no camp site in this public park. Can be reverted.
arjunaraoc (2024-01-11 01:02:50+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).

You can upload changes in nearby areas as  one changeset.  No need to flag each of your edit as review requested, as there are few editors reviewing changesets.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142203081
GeoAndi (2023-10-05 19:12:26+00:00): weitere Quelle: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Berlin/Verkehrswende/Gehwege#Querungsstellen
Awoobis (2023-10-05 21:49:42+00:00): Czy na ortofoto już znikneły te budowle? Zwykle dlatego są pozostawiane kontury budynków
GanderPL (2023-10-05 22:23:37+00:00): Nie wiedziałem o tym. Wycofałem swoje zmiany.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-31 17:49:23+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11242098699/history has fixme:type = shop that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What kind of shop is here?

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop for common values - is any of them fitting?
*Martin* (2023-10-06 09:48:16+00:00): Ahoj

Prevadzkovatela (Towercom) prosim davaj do kluca operator, nie ako sucast nazvu.
LadBir (2023-10-06 10:17:30+00:00): Ahoj OK :)
Tunturikyy (2023-10-08 12:14:27+00:00): Muokkauksesi jälkeen relaatio on ”invalid”: reitissä on aukkoja ja pysäkkejä on väärässä järjestyksessä. Haluatko/osaatko korjata itse?
Tunturikyy (2023-10-19 13:15:04+00:00): Korjasin jo itse
Frans S (2023-10-06 09:16:51+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142204616
eggie (2023-10-06 08:51:07+00:00): Hi.. Das stimmt jetzt besser.

Gruss eggie
user_177389 (2023-10-05 20:37:15+00:00): reverted by changeset 142205631
user_177389 (2023-10-05 20:37:22+00:00): reverted by changeset 142205631
user_177389 (2023-10-05 20:37:29+00:00): reverted by changeset 142205631
Abch222away (2023-10-05 20:02:41+00:00): extra source: https://www.kgm.gov.tr/SiteCollectionImages/KGMimages/Haritalar/turistik.jpg
yitimox (2023-10-07 06:24:47+00:00): Agreed. could you also look at these roads at satellite and tell your opinion which grade of motorway they are?

https://pasteboard.co/yOIa3s8KqdLa.jpg
Abch222away (2023-10-07 08:10:34+00:00): Its Eski Edirne Asfaltı, a major avenue under the provision of İBB. I think it would be better to keep it as primary road.
yitimox (2026-04-29 04:01:02+00:00): update: that road got their maxspeed changed to 90kmh. right now, mapped trunk suitably.
Frans S (2023-10-06 09:15:55+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142205171
user_177389 (2023-10-05 20:37:35+00:00): reverted by changeset 142205631
SomeoneElse (2023-10-07 12:52:19+00:00): For info see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15142
Glassman (2023-10-06 21:15:56+00:00): #TIP: We spell out street names in OSM. The reason is software has a hard time unabbreviating
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142205428
InsertUser (2023-10-12 10:10:07+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap. If possible please try to improve existing building traces rather than retracing them if they are nearly right.
woodpeck_repair (2023-11-06 10:59:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 143687914, 143687898, 143687891, 143687921 where the changeset comment is: Entfernung von Edits eines selbst-gelöschten Users
woodpeck_repair (2023-11-06 11:01:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 143688019, 143688024, 143688006 where the changeset comment is: Entfernung von Edits eines selbst-gelöschten Users
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-12-09 18:53:06+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/854893111/history - jak nadane są nazwy to warto noname=yes zdjąć

zrobię to tutaj
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-10-05 21:20:27+00:00): Dzięki za mapowanie i przepraszam za zawracanie głowy w takim razie!
Pt873 (2023-10-05 22:41:27+00:00): Olá. A região está em obras e o traçado das vias está sendo modificado. Esse cruzamento não existe mais.
SurferJake (2023-10-06 21:29:41+00:00): Tradução automática
Olá Pt873, obrigado pela informação! Vou recorrer ao seu conhecimento nesta área e vejo que você já excluiu os recursos, obrigado por fazer essas atualizações.

Hello Pt873, thanks for the information! I will defer to your knowledge of this area and I see you have already deleted the features, thanks for making those updates.
eggie (2023-10-06 06:45:46+00:00): Je hebt bushaltes maar op stop_positions  Dat zijn twee verschillende zaken.

Groet
eggie
eggie (2023-10-06 06:48:18+00:00): Even doorgestuurd naar de OV mappers
Leo Slager (2023-10-06 16:37:13+00:00): Dag Flame_,
Hier is terecht een stop_position verwijderd van een bushalte(platform) die reeds eerder van de kaart werd verwijderd omdeat deze halte niet meer gebruikt werd.

Blijft natuurlijk de vraag hoe de busroutes nu lopen. Daar duik ik even in.
eggie (2023-10-06 06:53:26+00:00): Je verplaatst de track bij de Randwijkse Rijndijk... maar waarom?
Op de laatste luchtfoto zie ik iets heel anders.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=142206537

De naam op die node heb je later weer verwijderd zag ik. 
gr eggie
eggie (2023-10-06 06:55:43+00:00): Ahh  Zie het al...   Oke zo.
https://www.satellietdataportaal.nl/?base=openstreetmap&res=0.3%2C0.5&datemin=06-10-2022&loc=51.96215%2C5.754299%2C18z&overlay=mos-0&marker=loc&acqdate=2023-09-07&acqid=20230907_105135_SVNEO-01&sensor=SuperView-NEO
Iso90 (2023-10-05 21:28:00+00:00): Added drinking water fountain (since description is not informative enough).
dmfr (2024-05-17 15:19:35+00:00): Olá Pedro! Podes confirmar que a way 1213435896 corresponde a uma nova rotunda nesse cruzamento? Não consegui verificar isso usando imagens aéreas.
pedropt10 (2024-05-17 20:12:29+00:00): Boas, aqui está uma fotografia da rotunda:
https://portugal.brainsre.news/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2023/04/ALDI-Guifoes-4-768x576.jpg
(notícia sobre abertura do ALDI em abril 2023:
https://portugal.brainsre.news/aldi-abre-a-sua-primeira-loja-em-guifoes-num-investimento-de-4-milhoes-de-euros/
)
dmfr (2024-05-17 21:37:09+00:00): Certo, obrigado pela confirmação!
MxxCon (2023-10-07 02:41:23+00:00): Is it considered "landuse=" if it's on the roof?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142207745
charmaine_dalisay (2023-10-10 16:13:22+00:00): @MxxCon, that's a good point, i'll look into it. what do you think?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142207745
MxxCon (2023-10-10 20:49:32+00:00): I think it shouldn't be landuse= tag. Each object as appropriate and perhaps with "location=roof"
Frans S (2023-10-06 09:15:19+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142207903
MxxCon (2023-10-07 02:40:09+00:00): Hello.
What does this relation indicate?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations_are_not_categories
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142208030
charmaine_dalisay (2023-10-10 16:13:07+00:00): It indicates they are part of the same plant and have the same owner
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142208030
MxxCon (2023-10-10 17:50:59+00:00): Same owner can be indicated using operator= tag on both features. That makes it easier to edit in the future. Relations are awkward and clunky to deal with if connected features need to be modified. For simple situations like this I think there's no need to complicate things with relations.
eggie (2023-10-06 06:26:34+00:00): Je vraagt feedback.. lijkt me oke zo.
Gr eggie
eggie (2023-10-06 06:43:58+00:00): Hoi.. Die OV routes en haltes bewerken is een aparte tak van sport.  Dat zijn allemaal realties.

Denk dat een van de OV mappers nog wel kijkt.

MVG
eggie
Leo Slager (2023-10-06 16:37:46+00:00): prima zo
Leo Slager (2023-10-06 17:01:20+00:00): De routerelaties van de bijbehorende buslijnen moesten een kleine aanpassing ondergaan.
Zie ook de transportkaart aan de rechterzijde van de kaart.

NB:
Met de editor iD kunnen routerelaties niet correct aangepast worden. Daarvoor altijd gebruik maken van de editor JOSM of roep de hulp in van een meer ervaren mapper.

met vriendelijke groet
Leo
Flame_ (2023-10-06 17:11:29+00:00): Hey Leo,

Fijn dat je hier naar wilde kijken, en het aangepast hebt. 

-Flame
eggie (2023-10-06 06:24:28+00:00): Graag bijtaggen op de adresnode.
eggie (2023-10-06 06:41:10+00:00): Info samengevoegd.. 
Gebouw aangepast
gr eggie
eggie (2023-10-06 05:03:29+00:00): Dag Flame.. Dit geeft een foutmelding.
Er is al een vlak. Daar kan de naam op.
Gr eggie
eggie (2023-10-06 06:59:15+00:00): Naam verplaatst naar vlak.
MxxCon (2023-10-07 02:43:45+00:00): Hello.
Are you sure about your tagging? Some of those paths are clearly asphalt.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142208417
JRCormac (2023-10-07 03:43:38+00:00): Yes, I was walking on each of these paths as I made the edits. Not one of them was asphalt. The cemetery has mix of roads and pedestrian paths. These were all pedestrian paths made of paving stones.
Langlaeufer (2023-10-06 08:22:23+00:00): Hallo HeHoHa,
ist Radfahren dort verboten? Sonst wäre highway=path die bessere Wahl.
Grüße Langläufer
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142208424
HeHoHa (2023-10-06 14:48:23+00:00): Hallo,
verboten war es meines wissens nicht. Aber der Pfad ist nicht wirklich breit genug um dort sinnvoll Fahrrad zu fahren.
Gruss
HeHoHa (2023-10-06 16:39:42+00:00): Hier noch der Blick auf den Ausgang vom "Zum Kraehenberg" bei Google Street View:
https://www.google.de/maps/@52.6777299,9.3199453,3a,75y,95.5h,70.51t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1stSjBFAI5xPljObqKtUKECQ!2e0!7i16384!8i8192?ucbcb=1&entry=ttu
Langlaeufer (2023-10-06 17:19:12+00:00): das las ich gelten ;)
Langlaeufer (2023-10-06 17:20:19+00:00): Danke
Frans S (2023-10-06 09:14:04+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142208503
eggie (2023-10-06 06:39:54+00:00): Dag Flame   Tip  Zet de highway=crossing op de node.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-10-06 06:23:26+00:00): Tip... Probeer bij te taggen op de bestaande adresnode.
In osm hoef je geen adressen aan te maken.
Mvg
eggie
eggie (2023-10-06 06:36:50+00:00): Info samengevoegd
Flame_ (2023-10-06 10:59:00+00:00): Euhm oke, ik deed dat bij andere wel, maar hier is de deur van de winkel op een andere locatie dan de deur van het woon adres. Maar als ik het zo begrijp gaat het erom dat je geen dubbele adressen hebt
eggie (2023-10-06 11:14:52+00:00): Precies,  maar zo zwart wit is het niet. Vooral als in een groot complex  de verschillende bedrijven hetzelfde adres delen.
Dan zie je wel dat de adressen ook adressen krijgen. 
Denk hier van minder belang. 
Er is maar één bedrijf. 
gr eggie
eggie (2023-10-06 11:27:02+00:00): Typo.. dat andere bedrijven ook een zelfde adres krijgen.
Er is ook met relaties geexperimenteerd.. dan delen de bedrijven een adres..
maar dat voert veel te ver voor startende mappers.
Agaric (2023-10-05 22:32:58+00:00): Correction source=survey
nickjohnston (2023-11-01 20:33:23+00:00): Hi. You've added two entrance nodes (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11242350932 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11242365756). They duplicate their buildings' addresses which is neither desirable nor necessary. You've also used addr:block, which is not common in the UK. If the entrances are for specific flats, add addr:flats. Please do not duplicate the address information (such as addr:housenumber and addr:street).

Thanks,
Nick
samon53 (2024-06-07 01:03:04+00:00): It's an unfortunate deficiency of StreetComplete that it can add entrances and address but that it doesn't give the option for flats. It only allows for "within a block" That's how I've added many flat addresses. If you find any addr:blocks by me (or likely anyone else adding them via StreetComplete) you can safely swap the tags to addr:flats.
adambyte (2023-10-05 23:48:02+00:00): Also specified the number of levels on the parkade.
Supaplex030 (2023-10-06 11:10:43+00:00): Mhm, aber da kann man ja bestimmt nur zu den Öffnungszeiten der Schule durch, oder? "foot=yes" würde aber erwarten lassen, dass jederzeit ein Durchgang möglich ist...
woschfan (2023-10-06 13:38:52+00:00): Diese Frage müsste man dann für das gesamte Gelände stellen. Idealerweise müsste man die Öffnungszeiten für das Tor festlegen. Wenn man einmal auf dem Gelände ist, kann man sich dort ja frei bewegen. Wie wäre hier die korrekte Vorgehensweise? Wenn Klarheit darüber besteht, ändere ich es gern entsprechend. Mein Vorschlag: Tor mit Öffnungszeiten versehen und alles, was auf dem Gelände ist (und damit ja dem beschränkten Eingang untergeordnet) allgemein belassen.
Supaplex030 (2023-10-06 15:59:01+00:00): Ja, wenn sich die Öffnungszeiten herausfinden lassen, reicht das am Tor. "access" würde ich allerdings eher auf "permissive" statt auf "yes" setzen, denn ein richtiger öffentlicher Raum ist das ja eher nicht. (Die Schule könnte jederzeit schulfremde Personen von der Nutzung ausschließen.)
woschfan (2023-10-11 16:22:56+00:00): Alles klar, dann passe ich das entsprechend an. Mir sind die Öffnungszeiten des Tores durch persönlichen Kontakt bekannt und schulfremde Personen auf dem Gelände müssen bspw. namentlich erfasst sein.
Supaplex030 (2023-10-11 20:53:15+00:00): Normalerweise würde ich sagen, dass Schulgelände immer "private" sind, aber in diesem Fall kenne ich den Durchgang z.B. vom Blutspenden im Pavillion, da kann ja auch jeder durch die Tür und über den Schulhof spazieren... Daher mein Gedanke, "permissive" könnte es treffen. Aber auch da wäre "private" nicht ganz falsch, denn die Blutspendenden bewegen sich ja immer noch mit Erlaubnis der Schule auf dem Gelände :) Naja, entscheide du.
woschfan (2023-10-11 21:06:27+00:00): Ja, ich denke "permissive" passt besser. "Private" erfordert "permission on an individual basis" - die individuelle Erlaubnis fehlt hier, wenn bspw. Blutspender oder Sporttreibende generell erstmal Zugang haben. "Permissive" heißt, dass grundsätzlich ein öffentlicher Zugang möglich ist, aber auch widerrufen werden kann. Diese Vorgehensweise wird hier definitiv angewandt.
aTarom (2023-10-06 07:20:33+00:00): Hola, gracias por editar, con el tag
"nº plazas"="40"
en
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/234979866/history
quiso etiquetar quizás
"beds"="40"?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:beds
Saludos
nickjohnston (2023-11-01 20:44:58+00:00): Hi,

In this changeset you've added a garden which the High Street goes through (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1213459717).

The feature on the ground is more like a glorified flowerbed, and in any case, the road does not go through it.

Could you please move the "garden" and the trees slightly so they're not intersected by the road, and perhaps re-tag the area as man_made=planter or similar?

Thanks,
Nick
samon53 (2024-06-07 00:49:24+00:00): done, seeing as it raised slightly the wiki does specify that it should be a planter.
Mashin (2023-10-06 09:48:26+00:00): Hi,
just one thing I noticed. Please be careful to not delete important tags when merging objects. In this case you removed wikidata and gnis:feature_id tags.
When merging objects you can select both and then press "C" to keep all the tags from both objects.
Cheers
Supaplex (2023-10-06 03:22:45+00:00): 請問公園有名字嗎?如果有可以加上去
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142210859
greenbudgie (2023-10-06 05:51:21+00:00): merhaba

şu anda kapalı olan turkcell'in yerine muayenehane gelmiş. muayenehanenin yeri burası mı olacak yoksa no:62 kat:3 bilgisi güncel midir? kat 3 ise turkcell'i eski haline getirip muayenehaneyi level=3 olarak haritalandırmak gerekiyor.

ayrıca muayenehanenin tek bir doktoru varsa sağlık kuruluşu yerine doktor ofisi olarak belirtmek daha doğru olacaktır.
greenbudgie (2023-10-06 06:01:06+00:00): muayene olan kişilerin nasıl ödeme yapabileceği (nakit/kredi kartı/banka kartı) de eklenebilir
BigKev97 (2023-10-16 15:07:53+00:00): Tu cambio ha sido revertido. No ponga la misma información. Gracias.
jtracey (2023-10-06 06:27:15+00:00): Just commenting for posterity to say I agree with this classification of Ring Road. I'd originally mapped it as unclassified, but it was changed (I suspect to keep bike routing off it), and I didn't want to start an edit war.
Kevo (2023-10-06 12:26:49+00:00): Thanks!  It's a private road (owned by UW) with low traffic and low speed limit so a tertiary classification makes little sense.

There are always a lot of new users in the area so it's not surprising that there are changes like that being made...
JJIglesias (2023-10-06 03:18:03+00:00): Saludos. Ten cuidado al poner la etiqueta REF=, en este caso pusiste esa etiqueta al rio que pasa por Villa Pereira tambien, no solo a la via secundaria.

Ya lo corregi.Gracias 
JJ
Farras (2023-10-28 17:08:29+00:00): Halo, mas Adianto. Penghapusan ini saya batalkan karena simpang susun Pamulang saat ini sedang dimodifikasi dan sudah setengah jadi. Progresnya memang belum tampak di citra satelit Bing maupun Esri. Terima kasih.
fishingboat (2023-10-07 03:27:10+00:00):  不要删掉运动场地
Vonter (2023-10-06 04:58:05+00:00): Congrats on your first contribution to OpenStreetMap! If you’re interested in connecting with other mappers, do consider joining the regional OSM groups:

OSM Bengaluru

Telegram: https://telegram.me/OSM_BLR

Matrix: https://matrix.to/#/#OSM_BLR:matrix.org

OSM India

Telegram: https://telegram.me/OSMIndia

Matrix: https://matrix.to/#/#osm-in-general:matrix.org

Happy Mapping!
arjunaraoc (2024-01-07 00:39:49+00:00): Check my improvements  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145975914
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142214300
Xvtn (2023-12-14 15:46:28+00:00): Looks like there were already some Wells Fargo tags on the building here. To avoid duplication, I merged them.
Patrickov (2023-10-06 12:46:51+00:00): 可能的话，请尽量保持您的修改在一个省区以內，谢谢
felipeeugenio (2023-10-07 11:28:42+00:00): Hola. Por favor cuidado con este tipo de ediciones. Movió la frontera. Tomar contacto con la comunidad para este tipo de ediciones. gracias
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142214643
Xvtn (2023-12-14 15:43:55+00:00): In OpenStreetMap tags, it's best to avoid abbreviations. So for addresses, it should be "West 11000 North" rather than "W 11000 N". That's because it's easy for computers to shorten/abbreviate words, but can be more tricky and error-prone to expand them. Here's some more info: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Abbreviations

I fixed the address tag. Thanks!
i2004 (2023-10-06 18:25:33+00:00): no entendi que hiciste con la 93
AgusQui (2023-10-06 20:33:53+00:00): Tenía un par de paradas desordenadas
Xvtn (2023-12-14 15:39:59+00:00): Since removing features is somewhat of a more serious action, in the future I'd suggest adding a source for the info when deleting things -- such as an in-person observation, using their website, etc.
Xvtn (2023-12-14 15:38:56+00:00): For this building, at first glance it looks like it's missing a name, but the outer school grounds already are named. IMO, it's best to avoid duplication in situations like that.
kartler175 (2023-10-07 08:54:07+00:00): Bitte konsequent verbessern:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4289695
felipeeugenio (2023-10-06 13:23:19+00:00): Hola.
Borró una buena cantidad de elementos que tenían dirección incluida.. Ya no existen?
 en caso de que ya no existan; la dirección dejó de existir?
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142215400
thopf (2023-10-06 09:49:44+00:00): Was stimmt jetzt? Dass es keine Einbahn ist, oder dass die Einfahrt verboten ist? Das beides widerspricht einander...