piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Fizzie-DWG (2025-06-29 03:09:59+00:00): DWG revert - invalid deletion of names in different languages

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168249031
b-jazz (2025-06-11 05:07:50+00:00): RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1393906427

The lines that define fairways, greens, bunkers, water hazards, and tees should never intersect (partially overlap) each other and we noticed that they are overlapping in one or more of the feature pairs in this changeset. You need to make features wrap around others. For example, the fairway should either fully enclose your tee box, or should fully wrap around it (sharing nodes at the boundary is okay).  Please read the wiki for instructions and examples of how to better map golf courses: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls. If you have any questions, please reply here and I'll gladly help clarify things. Thanks!
NorthCrab_upload (2025-06-10 15:01:34+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10939489362

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
amosharper (2025-06-10 14:58:39+00:00): (and fixed building levels that were marked underground)
osmviborg (2025-06-11 06:02:01+00:00): Du bruger 'check_date' forkert: 
*The tag check_date=* is used to document the date when the existence of an object was last checked*
Glassman (2025-06-11 16:29:25+00:00): Check out our wiki page on how to map straits. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dstrait. Using a node is preferred because the start and end of the strait is hard to determine. 

Also, I'm unable to find any reference to the Segastill Passage. Where did that name come from? I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167449711
BryaE (2025-06-29 05:03:50+00:00): Re: Historical name from a local mariner. Inspired me to make my first OSM contribution
BryaE (2025-06-29 05:04:04+00:00): Re: Historical name from a local mariner. Inspired me to make my first OSM contribution
spiregrain (2025-06-10 20:26:44+00:00): Tah!
palindrome_mk (2025-10-03 13:13:18+00:00): It was the ski mo track for the Ceripashina Peak that you deleted.
It is important one since many try to ascend it in winter (both in ski and hike) and the mountain conditions can get really bad quickly so it is important to have it.
We need it back
palindrome_mk (2025-10-03 13:16:10+00:00): I am local mountaineer btw, this is the track that is exclusively used in winter. Not sure how you decided it is non existent. Also, it is not deleted completely so only the last part is visible now.
palindrome_mk (2025-10-03 13:24:56+00:00): Simon, Please revert the Ceripashina SkiMo track changes so that we have it visible completely.
Thanks
dcapillae (2025-06-11 14:14:19+00:00): Buenas tardes.

Evite añadir descripciones comerciales o promocionales a los objetos del mapa.

La clave «description» se usa para describir el objeto allí donde sea necesario. La información incluida en «description» debe ser neutral y objetiva. Deben evitarse valoraciones subjetivas, por ejemplo, «el mejor restaurante de la ciudad» o «hotel moderno y confortable, en el corazón de la ciudad», «un lugar inspirador donde alojarse», etc. En el wiki encontrará más información: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description#No_advertising

Atentamente,
Daniel Capilla
MassCartog (2025-06-10 16:36:36+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM. 

You might not be aware but what you have put in this description box is not valid on OSM. It has been removed, but please read this to understand more about how we do things on OSM

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description#No_advertising
MassCartog (2025-06-10 16:17:33+00:00): Hello, Welcome to OSM. The features you removed in this and other changesets are valid. Please stop removing valid OSM data.

You have a new account and might not be aware, On OSM, we do not removed features if they exist on the ground. If it exists on the ground, it is valid data regardless of a feature being public, or private, designated or informal/illegal/unauthorized. Removing them is actually considered vandalism.

Its very clear that these features exist, and if you check out the "L3" Mass property lines layer, it appears its not even on private property but a right of way through some land. If it is a drive way change the tag to "driveway" type, do not removed it.

Also the correct way to handle this is to use OSM's tagging system. access=private, or access=no would be appropriate they are closed the public. Once this is done, services that do use OSM data will reflect that and specify their access. Make sure to give a source for this information.

Please read this for more info:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won't_delete_roads_on_private_property
MassCartog (2025-06-10 16:25:49+00:00): Please check out: https://gis.data.mass.gov/apps/massgis::town-of-ashfield-ma-gis-viewer/explore

https://i.imgur.com/XKTTqc2.png

This is Town of Ashfield official map, they have this listed as a official road with the property parcels around it. Please be carful to check with official sources and cite them when adding removing features.
user_5359 (2025-06-11 09:17:22+00:00): Hello! Please don't add any working keys like
mappedBy=22636133
taskId=574
taskIsSquare=false
taskStatus=VALIDATED
to the OSM data.
Gregory Peony (2025-07-01 23:44:41+00:00): Hi Camille, I am not able to view the imagery source that you used to originally map these footprints, so I'm going based on what I see in other sources. I wanted to give you some feedback, since this is the only changset you uploaded, and I noticed you mapping on another project.--- I cannot comment much on the validity of footprints though I do think that you correctly identified some buildings. It looks like you correctly circularised footprints but didn't always square the others (q) .--- You also glued some nodes together in ways that appear unlikely to represent the ground truth. Your cursor will snap to existing data if you get too close: hold alt to prevent this. It is possible that you oversized the footprints you added making this more probable: to scale elements select them and use shift+(-/+). ID editor keyboard shortcuts are available when pressing ? ---Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167450594
Frans S (2025-06-22 08:38:50+00:00): Hello , Thanks for mapping.
Please solve the issues. shown by the issue triangle before you upload your work.
Please map more accurate. Your mappings are rather oversized and don't reflect the reality.
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2025-06-22 08:40:20+00:00): And, do not connect nodes of buildings to each other.
Each building should be mapped as an individual one.
best regards
nw520 (2025-10-06 23:21:08+00:00): Hallo Sebastian, du hast beim Route-Master https://osm.org/relation/12328186 Straßen und Haltestellen hinzugefügt. War das beabsichtigt?
Sebastian Wallroth (2025-10-07 05:05:34+00:00): Ja, das war beabsichtigt. Die neue Haltestelle wird nur an Wochenenden bedient.
nw520 (2025-10-07 09:33:10+00:00): Danke für die Antwort. Routen-Master¹ beinhalten normalerweise keine Haltestellen und Straßensegmente, sondern ausschließlich (Bus-)Linien. Die Linienvariante mit den zusätzlichen Haltestellen müsste man als eigenständige Linie erfassen. Möchtest du das machen, oder soll ich das übernehmen?

¹ https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Relation:route_master
Frans S (2025-06-21 12:55:10+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
A remark.
Please do not connect nodes of buildings to each other.
Map them as individual buildings.
And, don't forget to square each individual building. (First unglue conneted nodes please)
Best regards
NorthCrab_upload (2025-06-10 16:10:50+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1393935228

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
m2fc (2025-06-13 10:55:54+00:00): Olá mais uma vez Rafael,

Diz que é DIGI confirmada mas continua a não existir informação atualizada no Cellmapper nesta zona que indique que tenha Digi. Queremos acreditar nas suas palavras mas dado que fez algumas edições erróneas de forma repetida, precisamos que instale a app Cellmapper para Android e mapeie esta zona ou junte-se ao grupo CellmapperPT em https://www.t.me/cellmapperpt e coloque fotos da torre em questão.

Quero recordar que o OpenStreetMap é para mapear tudo que seja observável no terreno e o que poderá vir a ter só se deve ser mapeado com as tags apropriadas.

Cumprimentos
Nakaner (2025-06-11 12:36:34+00:00): geprüft ohne Beanstandung
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167453030
Bvmz (2025-06-11 12:51:30+00:00): Hast du die Öffnungszeiten für Montag geprüft? Weil ich habe einfach den Montag mit in die Di-Fr Regel mit aufgenommen.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167453030
Nakaner (2025-06-11 13:40:37+00:00): Ich prüfe so etwas nicht vor Ort, das ist eine reine Plausibilitäts- und Syntaxprüfung gewesen.
ika-chan! (2025-06-10 16:31:46+00:00): …and one way roads, too. While the National roads should be as close to the city centre as possible, practicality is a major factor.
Juan Carlos G F (2025-06-11 13:08:55+00:00): Hola, según veo en la wiki creo que debería haber una o varias vías que delimiten el contorno y las etiquetar ir en una relación aparte.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dlow_emission_zone

Un saludo.
Jesús Gómez (2025-06-11 13:13:48+00:00): Es verdad. No había caído que debe ser una relación de vías-frontera.
Lo corregiré.
Jesús Gómez (2025-06-12 07:42:07+00:00): He visto en la wiki que se puede usar tanto polígonos como relaciones para definir las ZBE. 
De todas formas he sustituido el área creada por una relación de vías que delimitan la ZBE en Torrelavega.
nevw (2025-06-10 19:51:25+00:00): A building tag is only used to outline a building shape. The land is already tagged as landuse=residential but a polygon encompassing a larger area as well as landuse=greenfield for this block of land.
If you want it to be displayed differently you could map a surrounding fence line if it is present.
joost schouppe (2025-07-01 10:59:35+00:00): Lo has verificado en sitio? Solo lo pregunto por que lo estabamas discutiendo aca: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4381860
user_5359 (2025-06-10 17:04:48+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You move the node https://www.osm.org/node/1232602515/history more than 100 meters. I move the node back to the original position.
martien-176 (2025-06-15 10:39:27+00:00): Hi, thanks for mapping.

The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. There are a few issue though.
1. Buildings sharing nodes with neighboring buildings. Please avoid this, if buildings need to be adjusted or improved later on, it is much harder to do if they share nodes with nearby features. 2. Unsquared buildings: most buildings do have right angled corners and we need our mapping to reflect that. Accurate building footprints are important because building sizes are often used to estimate population sizes for an area to conduct humanitarian activities. 3. Including courtyard in the building outline: use alternative imagery, eg Mapbox, to get a better view of the outlines.

Please check out these sources for more info: 
- Buildings--> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o
- Roads--> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBLwb2nisJQ 
- https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit

Thanks so much for your contribution, Martien, HOT global validator.
diodaix (2025-06-25 18:55:02+00:00): Mas, maaf pendapat saya sepertinya landuse=landfill sebaiknya diberikan tag 'greenfield' atau 'construction' saja, atau kalau bisa quarry saja karena itu juga bagian dari tambang kan?
w_djatmiko (2025-07-08 03:23:23+00:00): ok
SpinOff (2025-06-13 21:56:39+00:00): Edytor w przeglądarce, czyli iD wprawdzie nie ma odpowiedniego presetu, ale tag jest udokumentowany na wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dbicycle

Dodałem tagi:
shop=bicycle
repair=yes
SpinOff (2025-06-13 22:00:16+00:00): Jakoś niedawno tam wylali asfalt, co nie?
theDM (2025-06-10 22:14:41+00:00): Chodziło o kolizyjne skrzyżowanie na jezdni w kierunku północnym z ul. Kazimierza Przerwy-Tetmajera (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/103367257) i na jezdni w południowym kierunku z drogą serwisową (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/240515277).
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-06-11 03:17:01+00:00): czy była dyskusja na forum? przed zmienianiem kategorii istotnych dróg potwierdzenie sensowności zmiany na https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/pl/40 jest obowiązkowe
SomeoneElse (2025-06-10 17:50:52+00:00): Hello Bamamba85 and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
I think your previous changeset comment might have got a bit "stuck" (this doesn't really look like "Updating golf course features").  Using changeset comments that explains what you are doing helps other people to help you.
If you've got any other questions, please feel free to ask over at https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/us/78 (you can sign in with your regular OSM account).
Best Regards,
Andy
Yunkers (2025-06-10 21:24:45+00:00): Co masz na myśli pisząc "prawie skończona"? Jest na etapie na którym mogłyby jeździć po niej samochody?
Fizzie-DWG (2025-06-12 04:50:59+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18336
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-06-10 17:57:35+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 98637125.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-07-23 01:02:39+00:00): Please don't add fake roads
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167457432
fortera_au (2025-07-25 23:00:31+00:00): Hi Fan7787,

Please don't add roads in unless they exist, or are tagged appropriately (and meet the community expectations for being tagged as such).

Kind regards,  
Andrew Welch, OSMF Data Working Group
user_5359 (2025-06-11 09:58:50+00:00): Welcome to OSM! What is the mean of the tag multi-pitch=trad? Please notice also: A relation is used to collect many object (not one)! Did you know https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Climbing#Climbing_sites?
letsridebikes (2025-06-10 18:46:45+00:00): Borehole data is available as part of this OGL dataset https://www.bgs.ac.uk/technologies/web-map-services-wms/geoindex-wms-services/
martien-176 (2025-06-11 18:52:36+00:00): Due to bad buildings mappings
bxl-forever (2025-06-17 11:02:32+00:00): Hello,

Is this amenity really outside the building?  It looks like it should have been located inside, right?

This looks like a mistake but I prefer asking, in case this was really meant like that.
Sisquou (2025-06-20 20:33:54+00:00): Sorry for the late response.
It is a little street vendor outside the building on the street. So yes, the location is right. It's a nice couple selling azorean Hotdogs and they are there all the time.

Cheers for asking mate!
Have a good one!
aTarom (2025-06-11 07:16:37+00:00): Hola, puedes revisar este tag
cruce = rotonda
en
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1393996424/history
en las imágenes aéreas no se ve "rotonda" y por ello no corrijo nada sin antes preguntarte, saludos
Josevidalworld (2025-06-11 12:19:11+00:00): Hola, al no tener fotos actualizadas me ha dificultado ubicar la nueva glorieta. La nueva glorieta existe, la construyeron cuando convirtieron la calle Eduardo Chillida a doble sentido. Si necesitas información adicional, por favor dímelo.
martien-176 (2025-06-11 18:51:54+00:00): Due to bad buildings mappings
Josef73 (2026-01-11 15:00:37+00:00): Hello, do you now know the opening_hours of the Burger King?
Comino (2025-06-11 18:38:53+00:00): Hi Donaldevine,

In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes".

Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag !
Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead.

For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Merchants

Happy mapping,

Edwin
flohoff (2025-06-10 20:38:04+00:00): Moin,
die änderung verstehe ich nicht:

Du hast hier auf dem weg und den beiden Nachbarwegen bicycle=no -> bicycle=unknown geändert.

Das ist ja erstmal eine verschlechterung der Datenlage. Da hat ja jemand getagged das das ein Zeichen 239 also reiner Fußweg ohne Fahrrad ist - und du hast das auf "unknown" geändert d.h. du weisst es nicht.

Warum änderst du das dann? Bin ein bischen verdutzt wie du da drauf kommst.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/629253568

Flo
Lexang (2025-06-10 21:46:28+00:00): Moin Flo,
es gibt dort ein Fußgängerschild, dass steht aber erst hinter der Weggabelung. Es ist vermutlich notwendig weil es dort enger wird und bergauf geht. Daher habe ich den Weg spline geteilt und bis zum Fußgängerschild das Radverbot rausgenommen.
Oder ist alles als Fußgängerweg zu werten?
flohoff (2025-06-11 08:45:18+00:00): Dann würde ich vorher das zu einem bicycle=yes machen und nicht unknown - Wenn du das vor Ort kontrolliert hast ist es ja nicht unknown.

Das war mehr so meine verwirrtheit - Entweder du warst dann dann weisst du das, oder du editierst auf unknown um ;)

Man könnte die teile vor dem Schild dann auch zu einem path machen mit 
foot=yes/bicycle=yes

So long - keep mapping

Flo
Lexang (2025-06-11 18:45:38+00:00): Ja du hast Recht, ich war mir nicht ganz sicher ob man dort mit Rad lang darf aber die Schildlage ist eindeutig habe es nochmal nachgeschaut. Ich habe den oberen Fußgänger teil nun auch auf designated gesetzt. Die Tracks lassen sich nicht verbinden, da sind unterschiedliche Endpunkte haben.
AntSom (2025-06-18 16:12:31+00:00): Hi NorwayHouseMap,

I had a question about the edits you made in this area. Is this the preferred naming schema for address information in this area? From what I understand the address information is its own tagging scheme.

Looking forward to hearing back from you soon.
Pink Duck (2025-08-19 12:42:55+00:00): These roads were mapped in 2020 as service driveway kind. Why did you change them to residential, for what is a cemetery surfaced access route?
Dimitar155 (2025-06-10 19:31:33+00:00): Please check the Romanian name. I'm not sure if it is 100% correct, this is what was written on their website.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-04-30 08:45:13+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24246938/history has vehicle = motorcar that was added in this edit
What this tag means? This access value is unusual
maxmichels (2026-04-30 08:54:12+00:00): Absolutely right. This was created by maproulette for "Fahrradstraße". I will check the new definition for "Fahrradstraße" and update the commit.
maxmichels (2026-04-30 08:55:13+00:00): Edit: Not created but proposed by maproulette as the correct definition for such streets
evgenykatyshev (2025-06-11 17:31:12+00:00): Hello! Thank you for adding your bar to OSM. Please don't add promotional text to description. Also, if your bat has Georgian variant of name, please add it to name field and move English name to field for English name
felipeeugenio (2025-06-11 14:44:47+00:00): Hola. Por favor no usar nombres descriptivos. El nombre fue eliminado. gracias
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167461195
ilias_ (2025-06-10 20:32:03+00:00): Hi, thank you for editing in Morocco.

Gas stations are retail areas, not commercial areas, as goods are technically sold there (gas). See wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dfuel#The_entire_area_of_the_gas_station
s777n (2025-06-12 08:14:50+00:00): Hi. Thanks for comment. Both landuse=commercial and landuse=retail are used for fuel stations.

For example you can look at how example fuel station is mapped at the same wiki page -  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=fuel#Example

It is mapped as landuse=commercial - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/329932705

Or you can look at this overpass query with fuel stations inside commercial landuse -  https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/25Vb

Personally. I don't care which one to use and will change all landuses that I have added to retail. This one is already fixed.
mapbear66 (2025-06-11 09:46:12+00:00): Hi,

Did you mean to delete the path from near Carn na Criche round the top of the crags of Garbh Choire Mor to Sgurr an Lochan Uaine... 

Thanks.
Moab_in (2025-06-11 14:16:55+00:00): No thanks for the heads up - I've put that back in 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167494123#map=16/57.05922/-3.73840
Kays (2025-06-10 20:44:54+00:00): Thanks for verifying the claim and tagging the ticket machine appropriately.
eggie (2025-06-10 20:39:29+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Dawid2849 (2025-09-02 16:21:16+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4920386
bartgron (2025-06-10 21:36:26+00:00): Zmiana nieprawidłowa, wycofana:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167464856
MassCartog (2025-06-11 13:01:41+00:00): Hi welcome to OSM. In this changeset you removed two valid features, service roads leading into parking lots. Was this a mistake?

Way: 1268206576
Way: 560713505
salma_ayman (2025-06-11 11:52:42+00:00): Hello Abdullah Al Werfalli,
Thank you for your contribution to OpenStreetMap. Could you kindly share your sources for the updates you've made here.
Examples:
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1389452241
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1389397293
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1389452240
My latest image is from 26/05/2025, and I notice that some roads in the area are still under construction.
Regards,
salma_ayman
fahreziandara534 (2025-06-12 13:51:04+00:00): https://domyproctoredexam.com/online-exam
CENTSOARER (2025-06-10 21:34:33+00:00): Hello.
I'm a bit concerned about your contributions for a series of non-standard tagging mistakes. For example, the use of all-caps and the descriptive names of some features. Please follow recommendations made in the Project Mexico wiki page (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:M%C3%A9xico).
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hola.
Me preocupan algunas ediciones hechas por usted debido a una serie de errores de etiquetado no estándares. Por ejemplo, el uso de mayúsculas y algunos nombres descriptivos de elementos del mapa (Parque con fuente). 
Por favor, trate de seguir los lineamientos del proyecto México en la página de la wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:M%C3%A9xico).
dknelson9876 (2025-06-15 03:58:45+00:00): Hi Joseph, I noticed that you edited some street names. Due to the inconsistent ways that TIGER handled them, they are a bit of a mess, so thank you for your work! As you go forward, please make sure that you are following the guidelines set forward at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Utah/Naming_Conventions. In short, since the actual signs on the ground say "1200 East", that's what goes in "name=*", and the full name used in addresses goes in "name:full=*"
zibetnu (2025-06-15 15:43:32+00:00): Thanks for the heads-up! I'll update everything I've changed to match the naming convention.
flex16 (2025-07-24 19:09:29+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1394026249

An dem Gehweg hast du wohl aus Versehen maxspeed getagged. xD
m_fuhrmann (2025-07-24 20:29:59+00:00): 😱 Die laufen da immer viel zu schnell! 😂😂😂
Ich fixe das 💪
m_fuhrmann (2025-07-25 05:26:04+00:00): Fixed. Danke für den Hinweis
Glassman (2025-06-11 16:32:08+00:00): #TIP: Street names in OSM are spelled out. The reason is that software has a hard time unabbreviating.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167465000