piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
gscholz (2026-01-15 07:47:13+00:00): Hi Pelage,
there are several errors left behind here regarding the grassland relation 284919:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=6.45882&lat=45.42953&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/284919/history#map=12/45.4454/6.4016

Can you please fix this?

I strongly recommend to use JOSM instead of ID to edit relations properly. It makes life much easier and prevents uploading such errors.

Kind regards
Guido
NeisBot (2026-01-17 16:23:39+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13421855784 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Mexican restaurant in Chesterfield"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-25 08:03:02+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177671655
(No visible changes after review)
msevilla00 (2026-01-19 14:28:22+00:00): Hola Martín,
Se más explícito en los comentarios más allá de poner ".". Has de explicar brevemente que hicieste en esa edición por ejemplo: "añadido camino en Torrecaballeros, Segovia"
Ánimo y sigue con esas ediciones
felipeeugenio (2026-01-14 18:25:12+00:00): Hola
tres y medio? tres medios?

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177225190
NeisBot (2026-01-17 16:23:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13438354872 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Athletic fields in Mobile Alabama"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-25 08:03:03+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177671657
(No visible changes after review)
NeisBot (2026-01-17 16:23:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/11175874930 v5

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Laundromat in Goshen"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-25 08:03:03+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177671658
(No visible changes after review)
dp7 (2026-01-16 08:34:21+00:00): Ciao. In questi casi dovresti usare landuse=commercial per delimitare l'area in cui sorgono le attività commerciali e building per tracciare gli edifici. Trovi maggiori info qui: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse=commercial
Dawid2849 (2026-01-15 09:48:09+00:00): Cześć,

Proszę o nie ignorowanie uwag edytora - podczas edycji wejście do metra zostało przesunięte w całkowicie nieprawidłową lokalizację - kilka ulic dalej. Już naprawiłem dane w tym zestawie zmian: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177251253

Pozdrawiam,
Dawid
woodpeck_repair (2026-02-12 23:21:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 178479265 where the changeset comment is: revert changes that pretend to be made with vespucci but aren't
TinPetreković (2026-01-16 16:21:51+00:00): Roads that were split unnecessarily have been merged back together in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177305292
Dodko (2026-01-20 13:50:57+00:00): čo ste tu chceli dosiahnuť?
A67-A67 (2026-01-28 19:10:13+00:00): Bedankt voor de update. Er gaat hier (en op een aantal andere locaties) wel wat fout. Alleen de naam en het winkeltype worden aangepast, maar de website, telefoonnummer, openingstijden en andere informatie van de oude winkel blijft staan.
OrchidA (2026-01-14 18:05:31+00:00): Correction: Comment is “Edited gates access and adjusted aerodrome polygon of airports in Indonesia #adt”
TrickyFoxy (2026-01-14 16:45:48+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177227550
limes11 (2026-01-14 18:03:47+00:00): Hallo und Willkommen bei osm,

bitte beachten, dass osm die Realität abbildet, dazu gehören zum Teil auch Fußwege über privates Gelände. Zugangsberechtigungen werden dann mit access-Werten bewertet.

Du hattest hier ebenfalls die Zufahrt nördlich des Weges entfernt, die ist bereits seit 15 Jahren in den Daten und existiert offensichtlich. Vermutlich gehört die sogar noch zur Heimgartenstraße.

Zum Fußweg: Ich habe mir den Mal in Streetview angesehen, der verläuft von der Dorfstraße kommend zwischen zwei Grundstücken und ohne jeglichen Hinweis auf Privatgelände oder Zugangseinschränkungen. Wie ist die Situation dort aktuell vor Ort ? Ist der als für die allgemeine gesperrt beschildert ? Gibt es ein öffentliches Betretungsrecht ?

Ich habe diese Wege jetzt erstmal wiederhergestellt, wir schauen, dann, wie wir sie am besten erfassen.

Viele Grüße
bxl-forever (2026-01-14 16:44:18+00:00): Hello,

Can you please review the shape of the building you have just added here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1467099269

It looks like you are tracing from… aerial pictures instead of using the GRB vector basemap, resulting in houses away from their real locations.

Thanks.
mcliquid (2026-01-15 08:24:05+00:00): Hallo UliFR, danke für deine Bearbeitung mit iD!

Ein kurzer Hinweis zu diesem Änderungssatz: Obwohl der Kommentar „kleine Korrektur an der Stangenbodenhütte“ sehr lokal klingt, umfasst das Changeset Änderungen von Belchen im Schwarzwald bis nach Domsjö in Schweden. Solch weit auseinanderliegende Bearbeitungen sind für andere Mapper schwer nachzuvollziehen oder zu prüfen.

Für zukünftige Edits wäre es hilfreich, wenn du:

Änderungen jeweils auf ein lokales Gebiet beschränkst,

vor dem Wechsel in ein anderes, weit entferntes Gebiet hochlädst,

und den Änderungssatz so klein und übersichtlich hältst.

Weitere Informationen dazu findest du hier:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Vielen Dank fürs Beachten und weiterhin viel Freude beim Mappen!
Ondřej Lopatka (2026-01-15 18:43:59+00:00): Hello, you made a ginormous edit spaning half of Europe with like 20 edits. Next time try to keep the edit localized, not on two different spots
troglobiont (2026-01-15 09:16:30+00:00): Hallo Reini, 
danke für den Eintrag dieses Weges. Ich habe den beschreibenden Namen 'von Bahnhofstraße zu Kringstraße' entfernt. -> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen
TinPetreković (2026-01-19 08:07:23+00:00): Roads that were split unnecessarily have been merged back together in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177411970
TrickyFoxy (2026-01-26 15:55:35+00:00): 👋 В правом меню редактора есть кнопка «Настройки фонового изображения». Выберите там спутниковые снимки ESRI — они свежее

Неактуальные объекты такие как эта дорога можно удалять
Nickolas McKiller (2026-01-27 03:11:39+00:00): Не нужны мне спутниковые снимки, я езжу по этим дорогам :) , а так как моя текущая работа опирается на карты OpenStreetMap, то я нахожу эти несоответствия и исправляю их.

Но за совет благодарю.

Думаю дорога будет актуальной после окончания строительства.
Baloo Uriza (2026-01-21 02:16:46+00:00): This is in the middle of a paved intersection where adding a camera would be physically impossible.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177227447
Srt84me (2026-01-21 19:42:57+00:00): Sorry, I'm new to this.  It's a few feet west of the pavement, not in an intersection.  When I zoom in it shows it correctly in the easement off the side of the road.  I'm I doing something wrong?  Thx!
Baloo Uriza (2026-01-22 02:42:05+00:00): Probably not!  I'm curious which imagery you're using; most likely one or more imagery layers is slightly out of alignment and just lining up the imagery with the map and moving the camera to match fixes the problem.
Kerploonk (2026-01-14 19:17:45+00:00): Hello,
Iceland has an agreed-upon standard for highway classifications for the national highway system, see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Is:Map_Features
The roads segments are supposed to be primary, since they are designated as S-roads (Stofnvegur) according to the Icelandic road authority.
4TL4S (2026-01-14 21:34:23+00:00): Thank you Kerploonk, I will keep this in mind for future mapping.
sm4rk0 (2026-04-03 21:21:29+00:00): Молим те, користи ћирилицу за имена (name) у Србији. Хвала!
Please, us Cyrillic for names in Serbia. Thank you!
TinPetreković (2026-01-19 08:11:08+00:00): Roads that were split unnecessarily have been merged back together in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177412100
woodpeck_repair (2026-02-12 23:21:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 178479265 where the changeset comment is: revert changes that pretend to be made with vespucci but aren't
TinPetreković (2026-01-19 08:16:42+00:00): Roads that were split unnecessarily have been merged back together in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177412316
Glassman (2026-01-14 18:55:28+00:00): You were ahead of me. Thanks for updating the tag.

I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177228299
NeisBot (2026-01-17 16:23:52+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13453181641 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Bakery"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-25 08:03:04+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177671660
(No visible changes after review)
stasiu512 (2026-01-14 18:03:33+00:00): Cześć, pasów które nie są fizycznie rozdzielone, nie mapujemy osobną linią. Wszystko było w porządku, zmianę wycofałem w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177230443. Pozdrawiam.
TinPetreković (2026-01-19 08:56:10+00:00): Roads that were split unnecessarily have been merged back together in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177413825
Rainero (2026-03-20 10:49:30+00:00): Revert mit changeset/180151654
(unzulässige Quelle)
woodpeck_repair (2026-02-12 23:21:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 178479265 where the changeset comment is: revert changes that pretend to be made with vespucci but aren't
NeisBot (2026-01-17 16:23:54+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13456455346 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Boat dealer in Richmond KY"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-25 08:03:05+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177671661
(No visible changes after review)
Glassman (2026-01-15 18:24:20+00:00): Why are you changing footways to paths. The wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpath clearly shows what a path should look like. This is a footway, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dfootway
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177230821
ATownBike (2026-01-31 03:58:55+00:00): Highway=footway denotes a primary use as foot traffic.  Highway=path allows for multiple primary uses to be specified.  According to the port of Skagit's website, the trails were designed as a combined foot and cycle trail.  If it were primarily a foot trail with allowed bicycle traffic, then highway=footway and bicycles=yes would make sense.  As stands, highway=path with both foot and bicycle =designated fits the common naming convention for shared use trails I found already mapped throughout the US.

Plus, the surface of the port of skagit trails is gravel, rather than a flatter surface like most footways including the representative photo under highway=footway.
maro21 (2026-01-14 19:48:32+00:00): Jakie jest źródło tych danych?
foreigner037 (2026-01-16 07:25:03+00:00): Hi,

This edit contains multiple errors, please be more careful with future edits.
ChalbiDesert (2026-01-20 19:13:37+00:00): Hello foreigner037,

The edits I made are what the cited imagery from 2025-07-04 reflects, which shows the junction at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10809084224 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12257828609 to be paved, open, and in use, with vehicles visible traveling on them. I am aware there has been some time since the imagery was taken and that there have possibly been further updates since then. I am happy to defer to your knowledge here. Have a nice day!
foreigner037 (2026-01-20 19:17:25+00:00): Hi,

The imagery you were seeing is most probably incorrect. There are three carriageways between the two nodes that you cited. It's not that the situation was incorrect, it's more that the junction layout was completely wrong.
foreigner037 (2026-01-20 19:19:25+00:00): If you look at the version history of the roads you will see that most of them are fairly recent. The bulgarian OSM community is trying its best to keep up with all large infrastructure projects. If you wish to stay up to date you can visit the bulgarian Skyscrapercity forum page where you can find up to date drone footage from most places.
ChalbiDesert (2026-01-21 04:10:31+00:00): Thank you for your information, have a great day!
ssundell (2026-03-22 19:55:31+00:00): Moi! Onkohan tuohon joku syy, että noita metsäteitä muutetaan service-tyyppisiksi? Lähtökohtaisestihan niiden pitäisi olla nimenomaan track, mitä ne ovat aiemmin olleet.
eggie (2026-01-14 19:54:47+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Ltrlg (2026-01-14 21:51:13+00:00): Ça ne ressemble pas vraiment à un nom. C’est vraiment écrit en façade tel quel ?
Sébastien Chopin (2026-01-15 04:55:53+00:00): Oui, c’est le nom le plus en évidence. Il s’agit en fait d’une maison médicale recouvrant plusieurs spécialités comme indiqué ici : https://laser-esthetique-angers.fr/ (esthétisme, dermato, ophtalmo …).
mueschel (2026-01-17 16:22:42+00:00): Hi,
this is the only occurrence of "payment:inpost" - but we have many "payment:inpost_mobile". Is this the same?
ChrissW-R1 (2026-01-16 21:52:10+00:00): https://osm.org/way/1467121537
https://osm.org/way/1252108027

Which city is the right of the addresses? There are two tags with different values.
ToniE (2026-01-17 12:00:38+00:00): Hallo,

hier, in diesem CS, hast du in der Relation 2513344

- Bus N22: Alt-Lübars => Tegelort (2513344)

alle Stops, Platforms und Ways gelöscht. Die Relation hat keine 'member', was prinzipiell bei einer Relation nicht vorkommen darf

Kannst Du bitte die 301 'member' der Version 124 dieser Relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2513344/history/124 wieder einfügen, die Relation in den Stand "124 " versetzen. Ein kompletter "revert" dieses CS wäre mit "Kanonen auf Spatzen schießen"

JOSM hat wohl ein "revert CS" Plugin, damit habe ich aber bisher nur komplette CS revertiert.

"CS" = ChangeSet"

Gruß
Toni
Supaplex030 (2026-01-18 12:38:09+00:00): Danke Toni fürs entdecken! Ich habe die Relation(smitglieder) wieder hergestellt – hier ein hilfreicher Thread, wie das in so einem Fall geht: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/wiederherstellung-der-relation-restoring-the-relation/120281/6

Es scheinen auch vorher schon ein paar Lücken drin gewesen zu sein, die ich gefixt habe.
Lumikeiju (2026-02-15 19:45:53+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OSM! 

Note that `addr:state` values should be capitalized (`WA` not `wa`) - I've updated that tag on this object in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178597208.

Thank you for your contribution, and happy mapping!
Gonéo (2026-01-16 09:43:09+00:00): J'ai corrigé la traversée piétonne sur Vivier-Merle qui n'était pas connectée aux routes croisées. Est-ce que Go Map a un souci avec les connexions ?
Biblioteka Narodowa (2026-01-14 21:01:45+00:00): Jako ciekawostkę powiem, że formalnie nie ma ulicy Leszowej w miejscu, w którym jest na mapie :) Dlatego od strony al. Niepodległości stoi szlaban. Jest to teren Parku Pole Mokotowskie w Zarządzie Zieleni.
Kiedys MPO jak miało baze na POLU zrobiło ten przejazd żeby miec dojazd do swojej bazy, ale formalnie nigdy tej ulicy w tym miejcu nie było i własciwie zaraz nie będzie. Uprosiłam, zeby zostawili dojazd przez park do domku fińskiego i do naszej pierwszej bramy, ale na pewno nie będzie do drugiej bramy.

Za to formalnie ul. Leszowa istnieje tam gdzie w praktyce jej nie ma :) miedzy Ondraszka a wpisaną Leszowa, ale tam jest ścieżka dla pieszych i ulicy na pewno nigdy w praktyce nie będzie.

Taka ciekawostka do wyprostowania
MassCartog (2026-01-14 20:23:04+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM. The features you removed in this changeset are valid. Please don’t remove valid OSM data.

You have a new account and might not be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground. If it exists on the ground, it is valid data regardless of a feature being public or private, designated or informal/illegal/unauthorized. Removing features that exist is actually considered vandalism.

It's clear that these features still exist on the ground. Not being public access areas is an invalid reason to remove data from OSM. So this edit is incorrect and damaging to valid OSM data.

The correct way to handle this is to use OSM's tagging system. access=private, or access=no would be appropriate if they are closed to the public. Once this is done, services that do use OSM data will reflect that and specify their access. So if these are non-public roads/areas for private deliveries, tag them as such.

Please read this for more info:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won't_delete_roads_on_private_property
NeisBot (2026-01-17 16:24:06+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13456683242 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Mersey Heating and Air Conditioning Scarborough"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-25 08:54:02+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177672843
(No visible changes after review)
eggie (2026-01-14 20:14:46+00:00): Dag  Sirolv,

Het adres heb ik weer herteld. Wanneer iets sluit graag het adres intact houden.

MVG
eggie
b-jazz (2026-01-16 17:24:05+00:00): FYI, I reversed a bunch of the golf=hole ways on this course so they lead from the tee to the hole. Direction matters. Just letting you know for any future golf mapping you do. Thanks for the contributions.
5m4u9 (2026-01-16 03:06:09+00:00): hola, en sus recientes actualizaciones de rutas añaden una etiqueta "checkdate" con un valor de la fecha que editan, pero ese formato es erróneo...

el formato válido es: AAAA-MM-DD y no DD/MM/AAAA.
Robot8A (2026-01-14 20:24:05+00:00): I updated the Wikidata link. I deleted some names that were wrongly added earlier (as they referred to the Wikidata item that previously pointed to it). Updated the name in several languages.
Hb- (2026-02-16 15:18:51+00:00): Hallo, Du hast den node/1855645648 um 220 m nach Norden verschoben und die alte Hausnummer auf dem Punkt belassen. Das werde ich komplett streichen. Gibt es den Laden überhaupt noch? Dann bitte an dem Punkt die Daten wieder neu setzen.
klaus-juergensen (2026-02-16 15:44:04+00:00): Sorry, da ist etwas schief gelaufen,
danke für die Korrektur
CurlingMan13 (2026-01-16 02:12:01+00:00): I'm not sure how adding a building from imagery is considered "private"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177235582
pwbriggs (2026-01-15 18:54:53+00:00): Hi, thanks for the contribution!

I don't see any Flock cameras at this location based on 2021 street-level imagery. The only camera I can see is mounted on the pole at the northeast corner of this intersection, which is the WSDOT US2 mile 13.9 traffic camera (https://images.wsdot.wa.gov/nw/002vc01390.jpg, see https://wsdot.com/Travel/Real-time/Map/). WSDOT traffic cameras are neither ALPRs nor manufactured by Flock.

Could you please confirm that there is a license plate reader at this place? I'll add the washdot camera separately because this doesn't seem to be it.
clay_c (2026-02-28 01:48:35+00:00): Hi Nick! Thanks for all the detailed mapping along Broadway.

How come the name of Asia on Argyle was changed back to West Argyle Street Historic District? I feel that the on-the-ground rule favors the new name—I haven't seen the old name posted anywhere, but "Asia on Argyle" is on murals in the neighborhood as well as directional signage along Lake Shore and Sheridan.
nickvet419 (2026-02-28 02:52:17+00:00): "directional signage along Lake Shore and Sheridan."?? there was a sign on the CTA bridge that was removed in 2023 with the station and track rebuild.  Asia on Argyle is listed as a loc_name as well as an alt_name along with some others like New Chinatown.  West Argyle Street Historic District is its official name used on National Register of Historic Places and other city documents. https://npgallery.nps.gov/AssetDetail/NRIS/10000311
clay_c (2026-02-28 13:26:34+00:00): Indeed, there is now directional signage in the surrounding area that points you towards "Asia on Argyle", not "West Argyle Street Historic District", which you've mentioned is no longer present on the CTA bridge. I can go out and take photos if you'd like. On OSM, we usually prefer to use names that are posted on signage, regardless of what the official name might be.