piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2026-04-11 05:18:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13722481861 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Dog daycare facility"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisAgent (2026-04-11 10:33:34+00:00): 🕵 The changeset tags appear to reference Google as a data source.

Please note that using Google Maps, Google Street View, or similar Google services as a mapping source is not allowed in OpenStreetMap due to license restrictions.

More information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google

If the data in this changeset was derived from Google or another incompatible source, the edits may need to be reverted.

If this is a misunderstanding and the data was collected from permitted sources (e.g. local survey, Bing imagery, local knowledge, etc.), please clarify in a reply.
NeisBot (2026-04-11 05:51:50+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13722473310 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "guest rooms"
---
Na przykład, bardziej neutralna i obiektywna wersja Twojego tekstu mogłaby brzmieć: "pokoje gościnne"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
Palina Markina (2026-04-16 07:37:11+00:00): Hi, ibgeek!
We noticed your recent edit on this intersection.
However, mapping each lane as a separate way does not align with OSM guidelines. According to the OSM Wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highways#:~:text=A%20road%20consisting,dual%20carriageways.
“A road consisting of one carriageway (bidirectional or one-way) is mapped using one linear OSM way, regardless of the number of lanes.”
Based on this, the current geometry appears to be over-split. In addition, with the current mapping, the movement from Triton Drive to Metro Center Boulevard (north to south) is no longer possible, although it is allowed according to road markings.
We also noticed that some relations (including public transport routes) seem to be broken after this edit.
Could you please review this and consider restoring the previous geometry for this intersection?
Best regards, Palina Markina
ibgeek (2026-04-17 00:13:25+00:00): Very sorry about that.  I will look at getting it resolved.  The only reason I came here was because navigation was missing the inside lane going straight from metro center to the left lane of triton.  I thought that I had to mark each lane.  I'll read up on what I did wrong.  

Tony
ibgeek (2026-04-17 00:36:33+00:00): I am trying to revert this but OSM-Revert keeps failing.  Any tips on how I can get this to work, or another method.  I just want to remove all of my changes.
ibgeek (2026-04-17 00:42:58+00:00): I was able to get it to work.  Hopefully the changes happen soon.
HellMap (2026-04-13 10:54:52+00:00): Čau, dzīvojamās zonas vajadzētu norādīt ar living_street nevis residential. Es te izlaboju.
rusjanis (2026-04-13 17:11:58+00:00): Čau, ok. Tur bija proposed-residential līdz ar to atstāju residential. Paldies ka pielaboji!
iandees (2026-04-11 13:33:29+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1309885568 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181189736, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-11 12:38:59+00:00): Hallo MagicX79, willkommen bei OSM.

Wie sieht es den mit den anderen Wegen hier um den gelöschten Weg herum aus? Sind diese ebenfalls nicht mehr vorhanden?

Danke und viele Grüße
MagicX79 (2026-04-11 13:48:10+00:00): Doch, das sind die großen Forstwege, beim gelöschten ist der Harvester durchgefahren. Alles aber schon was her.
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-12 07:16:42+00:00): Danke für die Antwort.
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-11 12:47:36+00:00): Hallo Cafe Spot, willkommen bei OSM.

Ich denke bei dieser Änderung hier ist etwas schief gelaufen. Der Prager Platz ist nicht komplett eine Gebäude, oder? Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/574286479/history/7

Viele Grüße
unni-geo (2026-04-12 19:16:57+00:00): Gebäude entfernt, siehe: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181246080
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-13 05:49:02+00:00): Thanks @unni-geo
hlfan (2026-04-12 07:01:41+00:00): Ähnlich wie bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180042294 sollte das auch bei den Hauptrouten aktualisiert werden (wenn vorhanden).
Joseph R P (2026-04-12 21:51:47+00:00): The primary route here would be better linking Spring Creek rather than looping back to Idaho Street since the bulk of traffic on both 5th and 12th Streets would be heading towards the Lamoille Highway/Spring Creek rather than following a route like this.
Joseph R P (2026-04-12 21:54:22+00:00): This would be a rare primary-stub exception like Pyramid Way in Spanish Springs or Lake Mead Parkway in Henderson created by a busy, high-capacity road leading to a populous suburban area with not much beyond that other than low-traffic two-lane highway serving mostly recreational traffic.
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-04-13 08:47:47+00:00): Okay, I'll go change it back. But... is Spring Creek really deserving of a primary road? I've never heard of it until looking around Elko a few days ago...
Joseph R P (2026-04-13 20:03:40+00:00): On its own, Spring Creek probably wouldn't need to be linked by a primary route, especially if it was more adjacent and well-connected to Elko, but Lamoille Highway itself is the only route linking this some 15k population and a handful of commercial/industrial areas here to Elko, and thus it sees an AADT of about 14k-16k.
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-04-14 06:22:19+00:00): Ah. I just love how the AADT for SR 227 is about the same as the population of one of its destinations (that being Spring Creek), LOL.
eggie (2026-04-11 07:06:58+00:00): Welkom bij OSM.
Bedankt voor uw bijdrage. De info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode en guest_house=bed_and_breakfast toegevoegd.
MVG
eggie
NeisAgent (2026-04-11 10:33:35+00:00): 🕵 The changeset tags appear to reference Google as a data source.

Please note that using Google Maps, Google Street View, or similar Google services as a mapping source is not allowed in OpenStreetMap due to license restrictions.

More information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google

If the data in this changeset was derived from Google or another incompatible source, the edits may need to be reverted.

If this is a misunderstanding and the data was collected from permitted sources (e.g. local survey, Bing imagery, local knowledge, etc.), please clarify in a reply.
Kovoschiz (2026-04-11 17:28:09+00:00): Why?
NeisBot (2026-04-11 07:18:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13722561028 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Vehicle tracking office"

#MapWithoutSpam
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-05-26 02:11:25+00:00): Reverted addition of likely Google Maps-sourced SEO POI with a spam description and no top-level tags

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183183173
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2026-04-13 01:57:02+00:00): Selam. Ankara'da adı olan sokakların adları "Sokağı..." ibaresi ile bitiyor. Sokağı/Caddesi'nden Sokak'a çevirdiğiniz adlandırmalar yanlış.
---
Değişiklik açıklamalarınıza sadece bir nokta koyuyorsunuz, herhangi bir açıklama yazmıyorsunuz. Bu konuda size birden çok kez mesaj da yazmıştım. Lütfen değişiklik açıklamalarınıza neleri değiştirdiğinizi kısaca yazar mısınız? Bkz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

İyi günler.
eggie (2026-04-11 08:19:31+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-04-11 08:20:58+00:00): Feedback... De info heb ik nu samengevoegd met de al bestaande adresnode.
MVG
eggie
bxl-forever (2026-04-11 09:03:39+00:00): Hello,

How was the shape of those buildings determined?  Is the process documented somewhere?

I know that aerial imagery is sometimes quite distorted but a quick look as some buildings against the most recent "GRAFCAN OrtoExpress - Canary Islands" imagery shows that the building outline is significantly different from the "AI-computed" outline by this edit.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1498401519
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1498401532
DaanLT (2026-04-11 09:37:57+00:00): na tai reik taisyti situaciją
Enock4seth (2026-04-11 13:22:50+00:00): Hi KingVik, Do not just add tags to features without knowing what you are doing. I have reverted this change to V1 of the node.
ququruzka (2026-04-21 08:44:03+00:00): добрий день!
підкажіть, будь ласка, навіщо змінювали дані в  тегу "name"?
На території України name=* i name:uk=* мають співпадати.
Виправте в найкоротші строки.
mastermint (2026-04-12 15:45:02+00:00): Den tag building=sportverein gibt es nicht. Informationen dazu gibt es im Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:building
Um einen Sportverein einzutragen gibt es hier Hilfe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:club%3Dsport
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181180186
NeisBot (2026-04-11 09:27:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13722707430 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Breeding ranch"

#MapWithoutSpam
Enock4seth (2026-04-11 13:03:13+00:00): Hi KingVik, are you just clicking some buttons without checking what you are adding to OpenStreetMap? How is this node a school?
KingVik (2026-04-11 13:46:08+00:00): Thank you, Enock, for calling my attention
it is entirely my fault; I mistake the address as school. I have check it well with other attributes
just trying to add the primary tag
NeisBot (2026-04-11 09:36:39+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 10 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1498408841 v1 | 5 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1498408845 v1 | 3 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/13721354265 v2
https://osm.org/node/13721354280 v2
https://osm.org/node/13721354251 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=181180894
Mannivu (2026-04-11 09:56:11+00:00): Attenzione perché questo non è un cimitero, è un edificio. Se è un mausoleo o un edificio contenente cappelle va indicato comunque come edificio, perché il cimitero è tutta l'area circostante
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181180935
NeisBot (2026-04-11 09:48:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/1422731477 v4

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Italian shop"
---
Například více neutrální a faktická verze tvého textu by mohla být: "Italský obchod"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
olo81 (2026-05-26 17:44:31+00:00): "Budynek laboratoryjno-biurowy" nie jest nazwą, tylko opisem budynku. Do usunięcia. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Nazwy
Tomas Straupis (2026-04-11 17:21:57+00:00): O šitas tourism=challet turi kokį nors pavadinimą, svetainę ar kažkokią informaciją, kas tai per daiktas? Nes dabar gaunasi varom turistus kažkur į mišką, kur „bus kažkas“ :-)
Cotep4 (2026-04-21 01:05:29+00:00): Šio nuomojamo kotedžo užsakymų platformos komentaruose matau, kad žmonėms sunku rasti kotedžą savo žemėlapių programose, todėl norėjau jį įtraukti. Tačiau nesu tikras, ar savininkas nori, kad tiksli vieta būtų viešai skelbiama, todėl nenoriu nurodyti pavadinimo ar nuorodos į užsakymų platformą. Galime palikti jį kaip nenurodytą pastatą, kaip jūs padarėte, tai jau yra geras papildymas žmonėms, kurie ieško namelio šioje vietovėje.
Tomas Straupis (2026-04-21 05:41:18+00:00): Tai arba informacija yra ir ji pilna, arba jos nėra :-) Aš dabar jį palikau kaip tiesiog pastatas miške, be turizmo žymų. Jei taip tinka - ok. Jei reikia turizmo žymų, tai reikės ir kažkokią minimalią info pridėti, kas čia per daiktas, t.y. bent jau pavadinimą sodybos, kurį būtų galima kažkaip internetu surasti ir patikrinti, yra ta sodyba ar jau nebėra.
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-11 12:44:03+00:00): Hallo Wolfgang Reinhard, willkommen bei OSM.

Ich denke hier bei dieser Änderung (Löschung eines Knoten) ist etwas schiefgegangen. Nur endet der Weg an einem Haus. Dies war bestimmt nicht so gewollt, oder?

Viele Grüße
Wolfgang Reinhard (2026-04-11 13:04:12+00:00): Doch das war so gewolltt; der Weg ist nicht bis zur Fichtestraße (Kein öffentlicher Eingang / Durchgang) sondern nur von der Zeilsheimer Straße.
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-11 13:08:38+00:00): Danke für die Antwort.

In den Bing und auch in den Mapbox Satellitenbildern sieht dies leider anders aus. Dort ist ein Fussweg bzw. die Verbindung auch von der Fichtestraße zu sehen. Aktuell endet der Fussweg jetzt von der Zeilsheimer Straße am Haus mit der Nummer 53b ...
309_308_307 (2026-04-12 12:17:31+00:00): Hallo, ich kann zumindest den Gedankengang nachvollziehen. Am Ende des Fußwegs an der Fichtestraße befindet sich ein verschlossenes Tor, durch das man nicht durchkommt. Darüber hinaus ist der Fußweg von der Zeilsheimer Straße kommend als "Privatgrundstück, kein öffentlicher Durchgang" ausgeschildert.

Das rechtfertigt aber nicht die Löschung des gesamten Fußwegs. Vielmehr sollte einfach das fehlende Tor eingezeichnet und der Fußweg als Privatweg (access=private) getaggt werden.
TagaSanPedroAko (2026-04-11 09:59:36+00:00): Comment should be: [Connaught No. 457, SK] extend and update power line alignment, add substation details, improve alignment of segment of Highway 335. Wrong edit comment was given due to accidental uploading of changeset before its comment was updated.
Mannivu (2026-04-11 09:57:34+00:00): Perfetto, grazie!
Sylabowy Kot (2026-04-11 12:25:48+00:00): Nie tyle poprawną, co po prostu nową ;)
ieguy3 (2026-04-11 10:00:31+00:00): https://experience.arcgis.com/experience/1481eed4077842098b1174d0c8f23c17#data_s=id%3AdataSource_1-RoadInformationPublic_7-7%3A4708&widget_11=active_datasource_id:dataSource_1,level:15.452065996883537,layer_visibility:%7B"widget_11-dataSource_1"%3A%7B"widget_11-dataSource_1-RoadInformationPublic_7"%3Atrue%7D%7D
rempshaener (2026-04-11 17:52:43+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.
Ich habe eine Anmerkung zu deinen Bearbeitungen:
Die Hydrantennummer (die Nummer oben rechts auf dem Hydrantenschild) wird in „ref“ eingetragen, nicht in „name“. Dabei wird das „H“ nicht mit aufgenommen.
Vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag und weiterhin viel Spaß beim Mappen.
Viele Grüße
NeisBot (2026-04-11 10:15:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13722745725 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "EV charging station"

#MapWithoutSpam
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-11 12:41:25+00:00): Hallo Joulmarort, willkommen bei OSM.

Danke für die Änderung. Der Weg ist aber Bestandteil eines öffentlichen Wanderweges?

Viele Grüße
*abq* (2026-07-12 13:00:48+00:00): Die Beschilderung vor Ort entspricht nicht dem, was du schreibst. Da steht nur Privatweg, keine Durchfahrt zum Wanderparkplatz. Was ist denn jetzt richtig?
pitscheplatsch (2026-07-12 13:10:00+00:00): @*abq*

Meine Frage an die/den Mitwirkenden liegt ja jetzt auch schon bereits 3 Monate zurück. Ich bin mir nicht sicher ob wir jetzt auf dein erneutes Fragen eine Antwort erhalten werden. Wenn du dich Vorort auskennst, kann von meiner Seite die Änderung hier sehr gerne korrigiert werden.

Danke und viele Grüße, Pascal
eggie (2026-04-11 10:32:45+00:00): Welkom bij OSM.
Bedankt voor uw bijdrage. De info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode.
Het adres van de gebouwomtrek heb ik verwijderd. Er zijn adresodes.
Het gebouw heb ik uitgelijnd. Het dak is niet de plaats waar het gebouw staat.

MVG
eggie

MVG
eggie
Senihtu (2026-04-22 15:16:42+00:00): Hallo 
und schön, daß Du bei OSM mitmachst!
Kennst Du schon diese Seite:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Abk%C3%BCrzungen
DEshalb wäre besser, wenn Du hier den Straßennamen ausschreiben würdest.
Auf noch viele Jahre gemeinsames mappen!
eggie (2026-04-11 10:41:09+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback   Ook niet openbare terreinen en wegen mogen in OSM. Zee moeten wel van de juiste accesstags voorzien zijn.
Ik heb de parkeerplaats teruggezet.
Je had er ook een doorwaadbare plaats door een rivier van gemaakt. ford=yes ?
De P wordt bij private minder prominent weergegeven. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Map_HeRo (2026-04-12 14:49:24+00:00): Hallo raffie78, 

die Baustellen von Südlink sind m.W. so eine Art Wanderzirkus und bewegen sich relativ zügig mit dem Ausbau der Trasse fort.  So ist es zumindest hier bei uns. Ich würde sie daher eher als temporäre Objekte betrachten, die wir normalerweise nicht mappen, siehe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Mappe_keine_vor%C3%BCbergehenden_Ereignisse_und_Objekte_tempor%C3%A4rer_Natur

Gruß Mikke
eggie (2026-04-11 10:43:21+00:00): Beste ...het is correct getagd met private.
Beter niet verwijderen. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-04-11 11:15:16+00:00): Ik heb de parking als terrein verwijderd en parkeerstroken ingetekend met access=private
Die grote P is dan weg. Het is niet echt een parkeerterrein.
CTRL F5 voor het effect.
MVG
eggie
mavl (2026-04-12 07:26:53+00:00): Здравствуйте. Название заменено на такое же, но с буквой "ё".
Ozon OSM4 (2026-04-13 07:41:17+00:00): Здравствуйте. Спасибо, буду внимательнее.
NeisBot (2026-04-11 13:06:27+00:00): 🌍 Вітаємо в OSM, Mapsmakingsjob.
Дякуємо за внесок!

Щоб полегшити співпрацю та допомогти іншим зрозуміти ваші зміни, найкраще додати короткий опис змін, які ви зробили. Чіткі коментарі допомагають спільноті слідкувати за вашою роботою та надавати кращу зворотню зв'язок. Ви можете знайти поради щодо написання хороших коментарів тут[1].

✅ Ось приклад коментаря на основі ваших змін на мапі: "Додано водні шляхи потоку з назвами Прібужжя, включаючи деталі каналізації"
(Auto-translation)
---
🌍 Welcome to OSM, Mapsmakingsjob.
Thanks for contributing!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

✅ Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added stream waterways with Pribuzhik names, including culvert details"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment
NeisBot (2026-04-11 13:06:29+00:00): 🌍 Welcome to OSM, Rafa Afriadi.
Thanks for contributing!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

✅ Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added residential road with name Jl. Pd. Labu Indah"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment
vrix (2026-04-26 09:22:19+00:00): Hello Gin-an S, there might be something wrong in your changesets, as the Nagano Prefeture relation (R3560284) can't be found on Nominatim anymore https://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/ui/details.html?osmtype=R&osmid=3560284

Can you please double-check your changes?
Dimitar155 (2026-04-11 15:13:36+00:00): Все още не е отворен, поради което не е коректно да го пишем като работещ. Коригирах му таговете.

Поздрави,
Митко
Syl (2026-04-11 14:26:41+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai annulé votre modification car la rue Charles de Gaulle est déjà indiquée comme étant à sens unique, il n'y a pas besoin de préciser qu'il faut obligatoirement tourner à droite.
NeisBot (2026-04-11 13:06:31+00:00): 🌍 Welcome to OSM, Cian111.
Thanks for contributing!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

✅ Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added houses, farmyard, footway"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment
eggie (2026-04-11 11:30:39+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
NeisBot (2026-04-11 13:06:33+00:00): 🌍 Welcome to OSM, Rara Kholillah.
Thanks for contributing!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

✅ Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added cafe with building and opening hours"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment