piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
3Pappa3 (2026-02-17 18:29:56+00:00): Ciao, innanzitutto grazie, correggo le relazioni. Per il resto ti rispondo punto per punto.
Per quanto riguarda le highway=pedestrian all'interno di aree mi sono reso conto che qualche mappa (tipo quelle su wikipedia https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domodossola cliccando sulle coordinate nell'infobox) non legge proprio le aree pedonali. Lo so che non si mappa mai per il rendering, ma mi è venuto il dubbio che anche i navigatori potessero non leggere correttamente quell'area come percorribile e dunque fornire percorsi errati. Se invece il tuo dubbio era sul fatto che è una way chiusa posso farla "radiale".
Per quanto riguarda motor_vehicle=designated hai perfettamente ragione ma sono stato tratto in inganno dall'editor ID. Se provi a passare col mouse dal menu a tendina sulla scritta designated nell'editor ID vedrai che ci sarà scritto: "Accesso consentito come da cartelli stradali o specifiche norme locali" che mi sembrava il più calzante. Sai per caso come si fanno a modificare queste didascalie? Perchè a quanto vedo è proprio errata. Quindi quello giusto sarebbe permit?
Jrachi (2026-02-17 18:59:23+00:00): iD ha spesso questi errori di traduzione.
Segnalazione su GitHub (Metodo preferito):
Il modo migliore per correggere una descrizione errata, una traduzione sbagliata o un tag mancante è aprire una "Issue" sulla pagina GitHub di iD:

    Vai su github.com.
    Clicca su "New issue" (è necessario un account GitHub).
    Descrivi l'errore, indicando il tag specifico e la correzione suggerita.
    Questo permette agli sviluppatori di aggiornare i preset di iD.

Confermo che i navigatori che ariivano ad un area=highway + highway=pedestrian seguono il bordo dell'area.
Ai fini della navigazione si tratta di pochi metri di differenza (in linea di massima) e ovviamente come descrizione ti dice di attraversare l'area.
Una soluzione migliore è di usare place=square per le piazze e disegnare le strade/percorsi pedonali che l'attraversano.
Questo ti evita di scontrarti con incongruenze utili solo per il rendering/routing

Ivo
Jrachi (2026-02-17 19:03:36+00:00): Aggiungo che l'accesso alle aree/way pedestrian è di default escusivo ai pedoni (è sempre consentito l'accesso ai mezzi di soccorso e polizia)
Ma a volte esistono specifici cartelli che permettono il transito alle bici, in questi casi si aggiunge bicycle=yes.
Se non c'è il cartello specifico le bici possono passare solo condotte a mano (sono equiparate a una persona che porta un pacco...)
3Pappa3 (2026-02-17 19:29:12+00:00): Va bene grazie provo a fare la segnalazione.
Credo allora che tornerò alla situazione precedente con le highway=pedestrian  che si interrompono all'inizio delle aree pedonali
eggie (2026-02-16 18:23:28+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
marc__marc (2026-02-18 21:22:35+00:00): Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1479348238
trees is used to describe "fruited" trees (oil_palms <> date_palm <> coconut_palms)
if you only want to describe palm, taxone:en=Palm is a more common tag to do that.
Regards,
Marc
InsertUser (2026-02-20 01:49:21+00:00): It's in a farm and they were seen from a plane. It wasn't the best opportunity to see what fruit looked like.
marc__marc (2026-02-21 13:17:29+00:00): thanks for the feedback.
I have changed it into taxon=Arecaceae
InsertUser (2026-02-21 19:44:54+00:00): Yes, I was aware that you arbitrarily changed it away from the tagging recommended on the landuse=orchard page to a weird hybrid of orchard and forest tagging.
marc__marc (2026-02-21 19:54:48+00:00): Thanks for your review.
landuse=orchard page link to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:trees with describe using  oil_palms <> date_palm <> coconut_palms
Since neither of us knows the correct value in this list, I entered the taxon. I don't see what's hybrid about a forest in this regard; all fruit trees have a taxon, genus, and species.
Regards,
Marc
NeisBot (2026-02-16 18:03:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/1330107339 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Daycare center"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-25 05:35:15+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179018845
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-16 06:41:28+00:00): Moved Lil' Patriots Academy - Spanaway SEO POI to the correct location as a node, cleaned up SEO spam tags and fixed address of original building (an industrial warehouse), in changeset 184166229

https://osm.org/changeset/184166229
terpnos (2026-03-19 11:06:52+00:00): El Conservatori Superior «Joaquín Rodrigo» és una altra institució. Actualment, es troba al carrer de Ricardo Muñoz Suay. Crec que cal eliminar les addicions associades a aquest conjunt de canvis.
Jordi MF (2026-03-22 08:27:07+00:00): Gràcies, ja he eliminat les denominacions alternatives.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2026-02-17 12:10:40+00:00): Bonjour!

Merci d'avoir ajouté les limtes des vitesse.

Par contre, dans le wiki OSM pour le tag maxspeed, on dit ceci:

"The maximum fixed numeric speed limit, followed by the appropriate unit, if not measured in km/h. When the value is in km/h then no unit should be included."

Donc pour les prochaines, juste mettre le nombre sans unité.

Merci et bonne journée!
Ombrefeu (2026-02-18 00:56:46+00:00): Bonjour, c'est Mapcomplete qui ajoute automatiquement les unités.
Bonne journée.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2026-02-18 12:44:56+00:00): OK, j'ai ajouté un issue sur leur repo: https://source.mapcomplete.org/MapComplete/MapComplete/issues/2637
Glassman (2026-02-17 23:40:44+00:00): #TIP: We don't use descriptive names, instead just make sure the tags are correct. Looks like someone removed the name tags.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178642700
Confluency (2026-02-18 00:04:52+00:00): Thanks Glassman. Will do.
Dimitar155 (2026-02-16 18:47:22+00:00): И двата тага означават едно и също - залесена площ. Всичко останало са предположения, които не са верни за всеки елемент със съответния таг. За справка - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Forest.

А иначе, managed=no е подходящо за Ловния парк и Борисовата градина зад ТВ кула. Там има паднали дървета, които с години не се отстраняват.
rhhs (2026-02-16 19:00:00+00:00): The difference is small, but iD makes teh difference between "Managed Forest" (landuse=forest) and "Natural Wood" (natural=wood) Borisova Gradina is definitely not natural (all trees are planted) and managed (fallen trees on paths are removed). It's not something I want to spend much time on though...
BCNorwich (2026-02-17 07:27:16+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You somehow dragged a trafic light out of position, I've corrected that. I also made tweaks to the shop address and onening hours to suit OSM best practice,

Regards Bernard.
dcapillae (2026-02-16 20:17:05+00:00): Hola.

Este conjunto de cambios fue revertido.

Cada contenedor de reciclaje se destina a un tipo de residuo diferente, no se deben mezclar. Se mapean como un nodo independiente para no mezclar tipos de residuos diferentes en un mismo contenedor: un contenedor --> un nodo.

Hay que asegurarse de que no haya ya un contenedor en el mapa para el tipo de residuo que deseamos añadir. Normalmente suelen estar cerca unos de otros.

Contenedor azul (papel y cartón):
recycling:paper=yes
recycling:magazines=yes
recycling:cardboard=yes
recycling:newspaper=yes
recycling:paper_packaging=yes

Contenedor amarillo (latas, envases y botellas de plástico):
recycling:plastic_packaging=yes
recycling:plastic_bottles=yes
recycling:cans=yes

Contenedor verde (botellas de cristal):
recycling:glass_bottles=yes

Contenedor marrón (restos orgánicos)
Respecto a los contenedores marrones (residuos orgánicos), dado que aceptan tanto restos de comida como restos vegetales (flores u hojarasca) sería conveniente etiquetarlos como «recycling:organic=yes». https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/dcapillae/diary/400818


Gracias por su colaboración.

Atentamente,
Daniel Capilla
JonnyW03 (2026-02-16 21:12:32+00:00): Hi, 
What is your reasoning for the reversion of my edits about the territorial waters to the east of Gibraltar?
These are international through the ratified 1958 Convention on the Territorial Seas and Contiguous Zone, Article 3, which I cited as a source.
Do I need to get the DWG to sort this out or shall I revert this and we move on?
Kind regards.
JonnyW03 (2026-02-16 21:14:09+00:00): I also add that the reason it looks like this is that the UK has decided not to expand Gibraltar's territorial waters to the 12 nautical mile mark, therefore leaving it at 3. This does not mean that it is Spain's to take. Please refer to my cited article.
migonso (2026-02-16 22:36:43+00:00): Estimado Jonny:
Como bien sabes, la convección de 1958 no dirime la situación de la soberanía de la colonia de Gibraltar, por lo que sus límites ordinarios de 12 millas no son aplicables en este caso.
La única base jurídica válida es el tratado de Utrech de 1713 donde España únicamente cede las aguas del puerto, dentro de las condiciones generales del tratado (condiciones no respetadas por UK). En base a esto, más allá de pretender 12 millas, deberían ceñirse la aguas exclusivamente al puerto.
Creo que un statu quo responsable es mantener mi edición, que es por cierto la de los últimos años y la que menos lesiona a ambas partes.

Un saludo, 
Miguel
JonnyW03 (2026-02-16 22:54:57+00:00): Good evening Miguel,

I am well aware of the status of the Treaty of Utrecht, and the Spanish government's position on this. However, this is not a treaty which is widely accepted by the international community. The 1958 convention has been signed by Spain in 1971, therefore invalidating any claim to the Treaty of Utrecht. This is in Article 4. As you say, the status quo until now has been of Gibraltar as an enclave within Spanish territorial waters, something that is deeply incorrect. In the way that Ceuta and Melilla have their own territorial waters (to the 12 nautical mile mark), Gibraltar has the right to, but has not yet claimed this area of sea. This does not mean that by default it goes to Spain. Furthermore, Spain's ratification of the 1958 Convention, therein allowing Ceuta and Melilla to have their own 12 nautical mile zone,  by default agrees the same for Gibraltar. I'm afraid in this matter that the UN will always be a higher source of authority than the Spanish government, therefore invalidating your source of information. As you have also deleted the southern maritime boundary (between Spain and Ceuta) which had a large number of tags and data within it, I must revert your changes to preserve this vital OSM data. We can then have a further discussion about Gibraltar's high seas to the east.
migonso (2026-02-17 21:22:30+00:00): Estimado Jonny:
Tu apreciación es incorrecta y tus comparaciones son falsas.
La convención de 1954 (https://www.boe.es/boe/dias/1971/12/24/pdfs/A20882-20884.pdf) no contradice en absoluto el status de Gibraltar, que sigue siendo una colonia y a la que el Tratado de Utrech sólo confiere su puerto (artículo X) y no aguas territoriales, por lo que la convención de 1958 no aplica aquí.
La comparación con las aguas de Ceuta y Melilla es falsa, al tratarse estos territorios de plena soberanía y no una COLONIA como Gibraltar (ratificada por la ONU resolución 1514 https://docs.un.org/es/A/5446/Rev.1).

Dicho esto, mantengo mi posición de mantener la representación del mapa anterior.
Respecto a la pérdida de información vital de datos OSM que comentas, no hice más que restituir las líneas a su posición previa; no soy consciente de haber borrado ningún dato esencial.
Si quieres revertir el cambio, te invito a modificar las líneas para reflejar correctamente mi cambio si algo hice mal. Muchas gracias.
JonnyW03 (2026-02-18 18:16:56+00:00): Hi, 
I'm not sure if you're aware but you deleted the median maritime boundary between Ceuta and mainland Spain, something which while not visible is essential as contains a lot of metadata, such as time zone boundaries etc. I'm aware that we disagree on certain matters, but I'm sure we can agree that this essential geometry should have been restored, as I have now done. 
With this fixed, we can continue to discus the issues raised by the international waters to the east of Gibraltar.

Kind regards
SomeoneElse (2026-02-22 12:12:18+00:00): Whenever international boundaries are in question, it's definitely worth discussing in the forum https://community.openstreetmap.org/ rather than just using changeset discussions - that way more people will be aware of it.
SomeoneElse (2026-02-22 12:12:24+00:00): Siempre que haya fronteras internacionales en cuestión, definitivamente vale la pena discutirlo en el foro https://community.openstreetmap.org/ en lugar de solo usar discusiones de conjuntos de cambios; de esa manera, más personas estarán al tanto.
NxPFoto (2026-02-16 18:43:08+00:00): Quelle, zum ersatzlosen Entfall der Haltestellen: https://www.kreis-calw.de/Der-Landkreis/Pressemitteilungen/Halte-entfallen-auf-der-Linie-504-in-Nagold.php?object=tx,2442.14.1&ModID=7&FID=2442.14531.1&NavID=2442.562
CAM-Gerlach (2026-02-17 17:10:54+00:00): Great, thanks for adding these details and refinements!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178644582
CAM-Gerlach (2026-02-17 17:12:12+00:00): And welcome to OpenStreetMap; thanks for your contribution to our community! I'm happy to answer any questions you may have on your mapping journey, and there are a number of other friendly users mapping in the NRV that would be glad to do likewise. Feel free to reach out, and looking forward to your future contributions!
topolusitania (2026-02-16 21:02:46+00:00): Perfect. Tks
TL
topolusitania (2026-02-23 21:59:01+00:00): O troço Sul Norte não danificada foi aberto ao trânsito condicionado.
dmfr (2026-02-23 22:05:43+00:00): https://www.linkedin.com/posts/grupobrisa_grupobrisa-brisaautoestradas-a1coimbra-activity-7431785217519939584-frxL

Agora falta saber onde se encontram os basculamentos. De qualquer forma, se quiseres mudar já, não me parece má ideia, e mete-se os basculamentos num sítio qualquer, desde que entre os nós 12 e 13.
topolusitania (2026-02-24 20:03:44+00:00): Feito
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-17 05:12:37+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13570712992

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
aTarom (2026-02-17 12:49:44+00:00): Hola, gracias por editar,
en España
el tag
"crossing_ref"
está deprecated
por
"crossing:markings"
tienes más info en la wiki
crossing%20ref=*?uselang=en

Saludos
Frans S (2026-03-20 13:14:35+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
A remark. The track mapped with the tag "path" is by default unpaved. No need to add that tag additionally.
Best regards
DariaT_TT (2026-02-17 10:46:33+00:00): Revert of 178644987
breckenridgebravado (2026-02-16 19:31:21+00:00): Node 12967136510 ALPR is no longer there after an in-person survey visit to confirm
JakubS (2026-02-17 18:14:20+00:00): Coś nie bardzo poszła ta edycja lasu w niektórych miejscach. Obszary wewnętrzne nie są dodane jako inner do relacji multipolygon:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1079196096
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1079196098

A tutaj  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1079196099
to już w ogóle mamy landuse=farmland nie wyłączone z lasu i nakładające się na landuse=residential. Już nie mówiąc o tym, że na tym obszarze są również łąki, gospodarstwa rolne i zakrzaczenia, więc dawanie farmland na wszystko jest błędem.

Dasz radę to poprawić?
Aim311_ (2026-02-20 10:15:43+00:00): Lekko poprawiłem https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178811657
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-18 02:12:24+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13570794553

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
krawieck (2026-02-19 10:16:54+00:00): Dziękuję za informacje bocie. Paczkomat poprawiony.
rempshaener (2026-02-16 20:20:44+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.
Du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Zum Namen der Brücke kann ich nicht viel sagen.
Was mir aufgefallen ist: du hattest versehentlich einen Punkt der Hegelstraße verschoben. Nicht schlimm – ich habe das schon korrigiert.
Vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag und weiterhin viel Spaß beim Mappen.
Viele Grüße
TrickyFoxy (2026-03-15 00:10:43+00:00): В чём суть добавления запретов на повороты на эту грунтовку?
mueschel (2026-02-24 08:11:58+00:00): Hi, 
could you explain the meaning of 'hazmat:distance'? This tag isn't used in other places.
Vi2727 (2026-02-24 13:12:45+00:00): @mueschel Hello, sorry. It was meant to indicate how long the restriction applies, but I set it up incorrectly. I should have removed it now.
NeisBot (2026-02-16 20:33:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13570734719 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Liquor store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-25 05:35:17+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179018847
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
CAM-Gerlach (2026-02-17 19:53:26+00:00): Is this really the name of the cave? Could you provide a source for this? I'm not seeing one provided in either the changeset tags or comment. Thanks!
OpenMeatMap (2026-02-18 16:06:47+00:00): I left a comment when I created the node, but apparently it didn't stick.

Your concern is very valid-- I was hesitant to upload this node at all! My original comment said something like, "I could not find an official name for this cave. There is a large, spray-painted title above the cave mouth which says" Devil's Anus", with an arrow pointing to the entrance. I am using that as the name for now." 

I am new to contributing, so please tell me if this is not an acceptable name, or if I need more official documentation before naming natural features like this.
CAM-Gerlach (2026-02-20 18:24:39+00:00): Sure, see the wiki article https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names . In short, as something spray painted on top of the cave, it is at most a `loc_name`:

> loc_name=* is for the name of a feature as it is known locally, but only where this is deemed to be too much of a slang name or otherwise unofficial-sounding.

However, this would need to be substantiated by further research or at least informally asking various folks that live there to confirm it is actually what locals call it. It could very well be the graffiti of a single vandal that no one has gotten around to changing. Given the location near Provo and the local culture of most of the folks that live there (who would likely consider such a name to be quite blasphemous), I highly doubt they actually call it such.

Therefore, at least for now I would suggest removing the name and adding a Map Note saying what you state above, for other local mappers to follow up on. Thanks!
NeisBot (2026-02-16 20:48:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13506792207 v4

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Chiropractic center"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-25 05:35:17+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179018848
(No visible changes after review)
NeisBot (2026-02-16 20:51:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13570733071 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Flooring warehouse"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-25 05:35:19+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179018851
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
pesec (2026-02-17 04:21:03+00:00): Добрый день.
Спасибо за правку, но я не зря их сделал такими.
Еще не решен вопрос с распределением движения общественного транспорта.
Только после можно убрать соединяющий участок ул.Профсоюзной на перекрестке. и полноценно распределить движение.
И вы не исправили количество полос и направление движения по ним.
InfosReseaux (2026-05-01 23:25:18+00:00): Hello

I wonder if is there a public source available for the 225 kV cable route through Envalira tunnel please?
I have been looking for it for years.
225kV (2026-05-05 19:09:12+00:00): Hey, 
I can't remember exactly where I found this info but here is a media outlet mentionning it: https://www.ara.cat/andorra/linia-electrica-connexio-franca-realitat_1_1749817.html
InfosReseaux (2026-05-05 19:29:26+00:00): Great find, thank you!
NeisBot (2026-02-16 21:00:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13571078904 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "warsztat samochodowy"
---
Na przykład, bardziej neutralna i obiektywna wersja Twojego tekstu mogłaby brzmieć: "warsztat samochodowy"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-02-25 05:35:20+00:00): ❌ Text fixed by https://osm.org/changeset/178686900