piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
flohoff (2025-12-31 20:46:25+00:00): Die Art und weise wie du hier gerade austeilst ist das nicht zielführend.

Da wird nichts manuell eingetragen oder abgemalt. Man kann geometrien automatisch aus dem ALKIS übernehmen. Und das ist EXAKT so im ALKIS Exportes des Kreis GT drin. Das sind rundungsfehler beim umrechnen von bezier kurven auf multipolygonen. 
Dazu kommt das es für meinen geschmack ein paar zu viele nodes sind. 
Kann man mit 2 klicks im josm lösen.

Doppelklick in die Fläche
Shift-Y
Return

Fertig.

Und ich habe solche dinger auch schon übernommen, ich simplifye die aber vor dem upload.

Flo
DeFra85 (2026-01-01 12:05:35+00:00): Ja stimmt, entschuldige. 

Aber das zeigt ja das wies1 einfach unreflektiert Datensätze übernimmt und vor allem nicht vor Ort ist.
Gregory Peony (2025-12-05 19:10:04+00:00): Hi, most buildings you added here represent buildings but the one I flagged outlines a yard. Note how the scene is lit and use that to aid your interpretation.

Welcome to OSM and thank you for your contribution! 

Each footprint should represent a building. Please watch [this video about imagery interpretation](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJ-vUwtS3A8). Sometimes buildings may appear to share a common wall, but this is sometimes an illusion; only map them with shared nodes if you have reason to believe that they really do touch.

Keep on mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175551238
eggie (2025-12-05 19:55:34+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Meesvansteenbergen (2025-12-06 08:23:31+00:00): Dank u wel
Sylabowy Kot (2025-12-05 14:50:56+00:00): Podczas wizji lokalnej zauważyłem, że te pawilony mają numerację o numerach powielających te z CWW DOM. Wg https://www.bartycka24.pl/mapa-centrum/ mają one innego operatora. Stąd też wiem, że dodany przez kogoś punkt 24A na pewno nie jest adresowy (wprowadzało to w błąd) i należy osobiście zrewizować te pawilony, magazyny, jaki jest obszar tego jeszcze innego marketplace.
eggie (2025-12-05 20:04:36+00:00): Tip... Tag bij op de adresnodes svp.

MVG
eggie
Meesvansteenbergen (2025-12-06 08:23:17+00:00): Dank voor uw tip!
Sylabowy Kot (2025-12-05 19:08:26+00:00): Kolejna "aktualizacja" z "własnym" źródłem. 
Stosuj ciut bardziej szczegółowy opis aktualizacji i źródła, bo każdy ma swoje źródła ;)
AngocA (2025-12-23 03:35:47+00:00): Hola Lolj

Al mapear ríos, recuerda lo que te había dicho de hacerlo en el sentido del flujo del agua, hacia "agua abajo".
Aquí te quedó hacia arriba https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1456283176/history

Andres G.
Luzandro (2025-12-06 10:14:37+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5079699
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175552199
eggie (2025-12-05 20:02:33+00:00): Beste Mees Gebruik svp de adresnodes om op bij te taggen.
Het pand van de fitness is Klassenburgerstraat 14  Heb je het juiste gebouw te pakken?
Info naar adresnode verplaatst en adres van nr 14 verwijderd.
Ga svp na hoe het echt zit.
MVG
eggie
Meesvansteenbergen (2025-12-06 08:24:31+00:00): Ik zal het meenemen
woodpeck (2025-12-05 15:18:33+00:00): Hello Rdeipenau, in this changeset you have deleted 200 roads and the only comment you offered about this was "05/12/25". This is not sufficient; a deletion like that requires an explanation why these features have gone (for example "the whole area has been bulldozed to make room for a spaceport" or so). You can't just delete that amount of data without saying why. I have reverted the deletion. (DWG Ticket#2025120510000304)
karr4s (2026-04-03 06:22:54+00:00): Bonjour,
Le SIRET ajouté à cette pharmacie correspond à un autre commerce, situé au 42 Rue du canon d'Arcole (Toulouse). Il y a par ailleurs 15 autres commerces renseignés avec ce même SIRET. N'y-a-t-il pas une erreur ?
Hervé TUC (2026-04-03 07:15:29+00:00): Bonjour,
Effectivement, une belle erreur de copier-coller sans doute.
C'est corrigé : j'ai supprimé les SIRET de tous ces commerces, et j'ai également supprimé entièrement le café Coco-Karamel qui n'existe plus.
Merci !
karr4s (2026-04-03 08:02:10+00:00): Super ! ça m'arrive aussi parfois en adepte de CtC (j'ai eu tendance à laisser "ref:FR:SIRET"... dans le SIRET : on m'a signalé l'erreur rapidement).
rohieb (2025-12-05 15:13:37+00:00): Ich habe hier leisure=sports_hall gegenüber sports_centre vorgezogen, da es sich nur um eine einzelne Halle (mit Nebenräumen) handelt; meiner Meinung nach zu klein für ein "Sportzentrum" (wie z.B. an der Wilh.-Bode-Straße)
NeisBot (2025-12-05 15:26:11+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your changesets and noticed that the cumulative count of your recent edits (2 changesets) shows that 1173 of your last 1187 changes were deletions. This is quite an unusual proportion, so I wanted to check with you.

Could you please confirm whether these deletions were intentional or if they may have occurred by mistake?

#DeletionsCheck #Cumulative
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?uid=23497545
woodpeck (2025-12-05 15:44:44+00:00): reverted
bartgron (2025-12-05 21:36:52+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
bartgron (2025-12-05 21:36:57+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
NeisBot (2025-12-13 22:20:57+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Platformă de interacțiune între producători și consumatori"
---
Например, более нейтральная и фактическая версия вашего описания могла бы быть: "Платформа взаимодействия между производителями и потребителями"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-12-16 17:17:43+00:00): 🔴 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the original contributor or remaining promotional text in description tags by https://osm.org/changeset/176016022
ilias_ (2025-12-05 17:42:05+00:00): You also made edits in Japan somehow, please keep your changes local!
serock (2025-12-06 16:42:33+00:00): Hola Rdeipenau, le envié mensaje por privado y ahora por acá, usted hizo una eliminación masiva de calles y que otros usuarios tuvieron que revertir sus cambios, le vuelvo a decir lo mismo que en el mensaje anterior, antes de borrar, debe estar 100 % seguro de que la calle, el nodo, o cualquier objeto "NO" existe más antes de borrarlo.

Recuerde que por algunas actitudes los usuarios pueden ser "Baneados".

Si tiene una duda o consulta, puede visitar la wiki Argentina: osm.wiki/ES:Argentina

No dude en consultar la wiki, saludos !!!
NeisBot (2025-12-05 23:26:11+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your changesets and noticed that the cumulative count of your recent edits (2 changesets) shows that 358 of your last 358 changes were deletions. This is quite an unusual proportion, so I wanted to check with you.

Could you please confirm whether these deletions were intentional or if they may have occurred by mistake?

#DeletionsCheck #Cumulative
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?uid=23497545
pitscheplatsch (2025-12-08 06:00:03+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175553973
Baloo Uriza (2025-12-05 16:39:04+00:00): I'd leave the "name=speed limit change" stuff off but otherwise it looks good.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175554264
user_5359 (2025-12-06 09:02:24+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1456296050 (one of 9 ways). What is the mean of the tag NHX=yes?
user_5359 (2025-12-06 09:05:24+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/10740313834 more than 100 meters over streets and buildings. 
I moved the node back to the original position.
Baloo Uriza (2025-12-06 15:43:40+00:00): I'd assume that NHX=yes is an accidental typo of NHS=yes based on context.
user_5359 (2025-12-06 16:38:50+00:00): That was my guess too, but this key already exists. Is it really that difficult to delete typos in iD?
Baloo Uriza (2025-12-07 05:23:11+00:00): It's more like the validator doesn't really highlight that error very well.
mictter (2025-12-05 18:15:51+00:00): Mi primera contribución a OSM, la traza GPS la grabé con Organic Maps en el móvil.
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-12-05 16:55:14+00:00): Hello, why did you split these highways? That only makes them harder to edit.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175556616
NeisRevert (2025-12-07 08:32:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/175613179
where the comment is: "Remove testdata"
NeisRevert (2025-12-07 08:32:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/175613193
where the comment is: "Remove testdata"
NeisBot (2025-12-13 22:21:00+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Tree trimming and pruning service in San Marcos CA"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-12-16 17:17:59+00:00): 🔴 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the original contributor or remaining promotional text in description tags by https://osm.org/changeset/176016032
NorthCrab_upload (2025-12-05 23:52:17+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Bąkowiec":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/906193471
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1456303649

"Garbatka-Zbyczyn":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1456303650
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1456303651

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Gregory Peony (2025-12-10 06:06:43+00:00): Hi, all footprints you added here represent buildings , but they are generally oversized which has led to two of them overlapping. 

When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom out to obtain the orientation and shape, then zoom in so that you can accurately draw the footprint. Exclude shadows and yards when tracing the footprint. Keep in mind that you are looking at the [roofs of buildings](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape#Roof_shape), but mapping their footprints. Depending on how the scene is lit, pitched roofs may have light and dark sections that belong to one building. Generally pitched roofs overhang the walls of a building, so a footprint slightly smaller than the roof is accurate. You can scale selected features in ID with `shift+(-/+)`, or JOSM with `ctrl.+alt+Lclick & drag`.  Take care to make contributions that others can build upon.

Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
bartgron (2025-12-05 21:44:07+00:00): Nazwę Żabka piszemy normalnie, nie wielkimi literami
felipeeugenio (2025-12-05 20:33:59+00:00): Hola. por favor no usar nombres descriptivos. Solo oficiales. La plaza no se llama Coihueco?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175557045
felipeeugenio (2025-12-05 20:40:27+00:00): Hola. Octopus parece existir. Los otros elementos qué son?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175557143
Hugoren Martinako (2025-12-12 10:23:02+00:00): Revertido parcialmente: ninguno de los elementos place tiene una población suficiente para ser village, que es de 1000hab.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175839452
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-05 17:19:16+00:00): hashtags tag is wrong
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-05 17:40:37+00:00): And thanks for fixing!
Matteo Calosi (2025-12-30 18:40:15+00:00): Ciao, una strada chiusa al traffico veicolare per definizione non può essere tertiary, in realtà neppure unclassified come era in precedenza
b-jazz (2025-12-06 07:48:23+00:00): please make sure golf course areas don't overlap in the future. fairways shouldn't intersect tees or greens for example.
salma_ayman (2025-12-17 14:56:10+00:00): Hi AustinAkaHadiRender,
Thanks for your contributions!  I wanted to kindly suggest a couple of best practices that help make edits easier for the whole community to understand and review:
• Please try to keep the changeset size reasonable and focused on related edits, as very large or mixed changesets can be harder to review or revert if needed. More information about changesets can be found here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset
• It’s helpful if the source(s) you use are clearly stated and specific (e.g., survey, imagery, GPS track) so other mappers can verify and reuse your edits. You can find more details here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_features
These practices help improve data quality and make collaboration easier for everyone. Thanks again for mapping!
Best regards,
salma_ayman
Baloo Uriza (2025-12-05 18:55:06+00:00): This appears to be centered in a driveway.  What's the camera mounted on?  I might be able to better locate it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175558349
Frans S (2025-12-20 11:46:46+00:00): Welcome to the tasking manager and thanks for mapping buildings in this task.
 * Please map individual buildings without collecting multiple nearby buildings into a single object.
 * Please accurately outline all buildings.
 * Buildings should be mapped without snapping their corners to other buildings and features such as roads and paths.
 * Buildings should have their corners squared.
 * Buildings should not overlap other buildings and features.
Buildings ought to be tagged as building=yes (standard at HOTOSM projects)

Keep on mapping!
eggie (2025-12-06 08:58:43+00:00): Hoi Dannox,
Ziet er netjes uit. De enige foutmelding die ik krijg is kruisend gebouw / highway en dat komt omdat de eindnodes van drie stukjes building_passage niet verbonden zijn met de gebouwomtrek.

MVG
eggie
Dannox (2025-12-07 16:01:32+00:00): Is dat erg? De BAG-polygoon mocht toch niks aan verbonden worden wel?
eggie (2025-12-07 16:05:52+00:00): Nee.. juist wel bij onderdoorgangen.
eggie (2025-12-07 16:07:27+00:00): Uit de wiki..
The building and the way should have shared nodes at the entry and exit points of the building.
george1201 (2025-12-07 21:59:26+00:00): Muss man nicht disused:highway=track setzen? Damit der Weg in der Karte nicht mehr angezeigt wird.
george1201 (2025-12-07 22:06:06+00:00): Ich weiß jetzt nicht, ob die eingebauten Router OSRM/GraphHopper/Valhalla bereits die von dir geänderten Daten verwenden. Wenn ja, dann scheinen sie disuses=yes zu ignorieren. Sie routen mich als Fußgänger weiterhin über beide Wege.
Moepmoep (2025-12-07 22:15:03+00:00): Und paßt es jetzt?
george1201 (2025-12-07 22:19:39+00:00): Danke. Jetzt sind die Wege auch aus der Kartenansicht verschwunden.
bartgron (2025-12-05 21:55:18+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
Lishoo (2025-12-07 14:34:32+00:00): Zlikwidowałem przejazd kolejowy, korzystałem z nagranego śladu.
Tatfahren (2025-12-20 08:28:20+00:00): Ist das richtig so das man nur bis zur Treppe gehen darf und danach wieder umdreht? (diese hat access=private gesetzt). https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1456323486

Der Name klingt auch verdächtig, ist der tatsächlich, neben den unterschiedlichen Benutzungsverboten dort ausgeschildert?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175558713
Fraxi (2025-12-06 10:23:55+00:00): Извинявай, че питам тук, но защо https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13355962089 и другите 2 контейнера в другото приложение са с питанка?
Dimitar155 (2025-12-06 19:34:45+00:00): Защото беше малко глупаво и очакваше всяка локация да има от всички цветове. Вече е коригирано.
Gregory Peony (2025-12-05 19:56:04+00:00): I flagged some footprints here which most likely do not represent buildings.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175558797
bartgron (2025-12-05 21:55:07+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
Gregory Peony (2025-12-05 19:23:01+00:00): The two northern footpritns represent buildings, the southern one does not; unlike the others it casts no shadow. 

Thank you for your contribution! 

Each footprint should represent a building. Please watch [this video about imagery interpretation](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJ-vUwtS3A8). Sometimes buildings may appear to share a common wall, but this is sometimes an illusion; only map them with shared nodes if you have reason to believe that they really do touch.

Keep on mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175558987
de24000 (2026-02-02 15:22:38+00:00): It does not make sense to add a double track junction to a single track line. The junction must be single track as well?
pinkyPrii (2026-02-02 16:10:52+00:00): The plans to double-track the conventional line is at advanced stages of planning. In fact, the tagged source is the EIA report for the double-tracking. However, it is in fact possible that the junction will be single track at least initially.
de24000 (2026-02-02 16:33:29+00:00): There is about 200m between the conventional line and the entrance to the tunnel towards Bursa. It is going to a R=200m curve at best. Unless you want everyone to spill their çay, it is going to be a low speed  junction :) Also, traffic wise, most trains will proceed to the YHT line, not the conventional one. So it is most likely a single track junction, with no diamond crossing of the opposite track. Quite enough for 1 or 2 trains per day at low speed. I will change OSM accordingly if you are ok?
pinkyPrii (2026-02-02 18:50:22+00:00): The main aim for this connection is the operation of freight trains rather than passenger service so I'd guess the number of trains that will use it (in the future, that is) will be quite a bit higher than 1 or 2. However I concede that it is likely years in the future that it will reach that rate of use, and will be built as a single track with at most infrastructure ready for double track without building the superstructure. Therefore, sure, change away!
de24000 (2026-02-03 07:33:31+00:00): Freight? The tunnel mouth is at the same altitude as the YHT on the opposite bank. It appears to be about 20m to 30m above the conventional line. There is going to be a ramp as well on this junction... Let's wait and see what is going to be built exactly.
Herwescheluc (2025-12-09 10:13:04+00:00): Hallo, akino_germany,

da Du beim Turm von Hailo keinen Typ eingetragen hattest (OSMOSE-Meldung), habe ich einfach mal angerufen und gefragt, was das eigentlich darstellt. Das Ergebnis könnte Dich vielleicht auch interessieren: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1456327938.

Grüße aus Herborn

Andreas
akino_germany (2025-12-09 10:18:28+00:00): Danke für die Recherche. Wieso hast du tower:construction=freestanding entfernt?
Herwescheluc (2025-12-09 10:24:22+00:00): Keine Ahnung, wie das passiert ist! Hab's wieder gerichtet...
akino_germany (2025-12-09 10:48:35+00:00): Vielen Dank :)
grzegorz75jan (2025-12-05 19:46:29+00:00): Zmiana zostanie za chwile w całości wycofana. Proszę przekazać opiekunom by przestali kolejnym dzieciom zlecać edycję mapy OSM do własnych celów. OSM nie służy do tego typu zajęć.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175559391
Elefant aus Wuppertal (2025-12-08 15:02:47+00:00): Hallo zusammen,

Wenn ihr wollt, braucht ihr access=yes an Aufzüge und Eingänge von Aufzügen nicht explizit zu setzen, da es per se als default angenommen wird (wie auf allen anderen routebaren Wegen und Punkten auch).
Es heißt natürlich nicht, dass es verboten ist, das zu setzen. Ist halt nur default. 
Wir geben ja auch nicht jeden Gehweg, Bahnsteig etc. mit access=yes frei.
Wusste halt nur nicht, ob ihr das wusstet. Steht auch so auf der Wikiseite.
LG
Lukas
rempshaener (2025-12-05 20:27:06+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.

Das Tagging passt nur für einen Unterflurhydranten:

Für die linke Saugstelle hier https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=987079235893621&focus=photo&x=0.1852114658967926&y=0.565072899699153&zoom=1.8523489932885906&lat=53.1782968&lng=10.318405&z=17

wäre das Tagging

emergency=fire_hydrant
fire_hydrant:type=pipe
fire_hydrant:pressure=suction
water_source=groundwater
couplings=1
couplings:diameters=A

Für das rechte Exemplar wäre es

emergency=fire_hydrant
fire_hydrant:type=pipe
fire_hydrant:pressure=yes
water_source=groundwater
couplings=1
couplings:diameters=A

Bei Fragen bitte melden.

Viele Grüße
Frans S (2025-12-21 11:58:17+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Unfortunately, you clustered many buildings that ought to be mapped separately. I reduce them to single buildings, which means that many buildings also have to be mapped from scratch.
 Best regards
MFS93 (2025-12-22 16:38:31+00:00): Thank you for the feedback - I will be more diligent with this in the future.
NeisBot (2025-12-13 22:21:07+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "HVAC service on Vancouver Island"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-12-16 17:18:19+00:00): 🔴 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the original contributor or remaining promotional text in description tags by https://osm.org/changeset/176016050
bartgron (2025-12-05 21:54:47+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
Lishoo (2025-12-07 14:29:54+00:00): Dodałem budynki i drogi korzystając z ortofotomapy i poprzedniej wizyty w terenie.
Frans S (2025-12-18 09:11:21+00:00): Hello, Thanks for mapping
A remark.
 * Please map individual buildings without collecting multiple nearby buildings into a single object.
 * Please accurately outline all buildings.
best regards and keep mapping
Sylabowy Kot (2025-12-05 19:05:49+00:00): Ok but you could separate these two countries per changeset.
marczoutendijk (2025-12-05 19:08:23+00:00): Yes, I can! It was simply a mistake at my side leaving another cs open in JOSM!
bartgron (2025-12-05 21:54:41+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
keyyushi (2025-12-06 14:10:48+00:00): building=proposed etiketi kullanılmaması gerekiyor. Önceki düzenlemedeki problem neydi?
SimonHarms (2025-12-05 19:09:11+00:00): Halte diesen Commit nicht zielführend