piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
JJIglesias (2024-11-14 23:37:27+00:00): Thanks for the editions in Bolivia using RAPID.

However IA driven the inferreted data requires also edition not just validation and follow the same rules as per wiki and also like using ID or Josm.

highways=tracks requires also of the use of track_type, surface and smoothess, also inferred data NEEDS to be connected. Rapid do not warrant to inferred data being ingested to be connected between segments, so please follow the normal checks for ways and preclude to create islands and subnetworks.

Thanks and Best Regards

JJ
Tuiui (2024-11-15 22:32:36+00:00): Hi JJ,
thanks for your comment! Is there online documentation of Bolivia-specific rules/best practices to be followed?
JJIglesias (2024-11-16 00:33:26+00:00): Hi
Nothing writed in specific to use RAPID. But all other portions of my comment, are standard Wiki requirements, mostly not followed in the mapping.

But we try to have the best possible data for roads and tracks, including track_type, surface and smoothness, that could be easy derived from aerial imagery.

Thanks and Best Regards

JJ
Glassman (2024-11-15 03:12:15+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.
 Yu dragged nodes at UW. I'm going to revert this changeset.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159150017
Glassman (2024-11-15 03:14:19+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

The landuse is already tagged with the correct address and school name. I'm going to revert.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159150105
MxxCon (2024-11-15 07:46:53+00:00): Hello.
Could you please provide some supporting information regarding these church driveway names?
Are these officially named streets or names you came up with?

Also, please write proper changeset comments. That spam of letters doesn't help other mappers understand what you are editing.
hfs (2024-11-15 07:28:54+00:00): Hallo lberges,

Du hast bei diesen Adressen addr:city=Massen-Niederlausitz systematisch in addr:city=Massen geändert.

Meiner Meinung nach war addr:city=Massen-Niederlausitz vorher korrekt.

Massen-Niederlausitz ist der Name der Gemeinde, siehe z.B. https://www.amt-kleine-elster.de/gemeinden/massen-niederlausitz oder https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massen-Niederlausitz. Massen ist ein Ortsteil davon.

In Brandenburg gibt es insbesondere durch die Gemeindegebietsreform 2003 viele große Gemeinden, die aus zuvor eigenständigen Ortsteilen zusammengesetzt sind. Wir taggen sie systematisch so, dass addr:city den Gemeindenamen enthält und addr:suburb den Ortsteil.

So macht es auch die Landesvermessung und Geobasisinformation Brandenburg (LGB). Deren Datensatz “Georeferenzierte Adresse” wurde zur Nutzung in OSM freigegeben, und einige Interessierte nutzen ihn, um systematisch fehlende Adressen in Brandenburg zu ergänzen. Ich bereite diesen Datensatz auf, gleiche ihn täglich mit OSM ab und stelle ihn als Hintergrundlayer für JOSM zur Verfügung: https://hfs.github.io/brandenburg-addresses/#17/51.63745/13.720725 . Wenn Du an dieser Stelle in der Vorschau noch etwas hineinzoomst, siehst Du, dass auch die LGB die Adresse mit Ortsteil “Massen” und “Massen-Niederlausitz” angibt.

Weiterhin habe ich noch ein paar Kommentare zu Deinem Vorgehen allgemein:

Die Änderungssatzbeschreibung war nur “Adresse(n) korrigiert und ergänzt”. Es wäre hilfreich, die Änderung genauer zu beschreiben, z.B. “addr:city von Massen-Niederlausitz zu Massen geändert; Postleitzahlen ergänzt”. Dann könnten wir Mapperkollegen schneller erkennen, was hier getan wurde.

Weiterhin wäre es gut, eine Quelle für die Änderung anzugeben.

Und schließlich, wenn Du eine ganze Gegend vorfindest, wo mehrere Mapper sich zuvor einig waren, wie addr:city gesetzt wurde, dann hatte das sicher einen Grund. In solchen Fällen wäre es gut, wenn Du *bevor* Du mit systematischen, flächendeckenden Änderungen beginnst, diese Mapper anschreibst oder einen Beitrag im Forum https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/de/56 zur Diskussion einstellst.

Diese Kommentare betreffen auch Deine weiteren, ähnlichen Änderungssätze in diesem Ort:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159150067,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159122831,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159122792,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159122766,
usw

Beste Grüße,
hfs
silversurfer83 (2024-11-15 13:46:31+00:00): Hab ich ihm auch schon mal gesagt. Scheint ihn nicht zu interessieren.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159150127
silversurfer83 (2024-11-15 13:46:34+00:00): Hab ich ihm auch schon mal gesagt. Scheint ihn nicht zu interessieren.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159150127
streckenkundler (2024-11-15 14:35:38+00:00): Hei,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16873

Sven
Glassman (2024-11-15 03:15:49+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159150307
NorthCrab_upload (2024-11-15 00:11:50+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1259055867

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Szymson (2024-11-15 18:20:45+00:00): Noo... nie? Tam są wysepki fizycznie oddzielające jezdnie
joost schouppe (2025-01-08 13:40:51+00:00): Je hebt in deze changeset voor zowel het CC als de bib een dubbel gemaakt. Als je de info op het gebouw zet, zet er dan alle info op en wis gewoon het punt. Ik heb het nu zo aangepast.
joost schouppe (2025-01-08 13:46:56+00:00): Bij het CC had je verkeerd gegokt in welke straat het adres lag. Je kan dat opzoeken op geopunt of (handiger) via lara.vlaanderen.be
Het is ook niet nodig om city en postcode aan te vullen, dit kan een datagebruiker gemakkelijk automatisch doen
carfog81 (2024-11-18 17:05:04+00:00): Esta no es un área militar
ElliottPlack (2024-11-19 05:01:58+00:00): Greetings. What is the source of these boundaries named as orders? Is that name (the changeset name) something that can be observed on the ground, on a sign. If you could amend the boundary with sources, we'd appreciate it.

Elliott Plack
OSM Foundation
Data Working Group
Glassman (2024-11-15 17:20:00+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159151149
Glassman (2024-11-15 17:20:48+00:00): Naming the building is unnecessary since the surrounding landuse is already named.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159151206
Glassman (2024-11-15 17:21:22+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159151585
Glassman (2024-11-15 17:22:00+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159151597
Glassman (2024-11-15 17:22:16+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159151639
Glassman (2024-11-15 17:22:54+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159151762
Glassman (2024-11-15 17:24:32+00:00): The description says the business is inside of the building but the node is outside. Can you move it to the approximate location side of the building outline?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159152062
CrossEyedCat (2024-11-15 21:24:36+00:00): I can yeah. Technically the entrance is next to Jack's BBQ which is also inside the same building and that's why i put it there.. The Amazon Unicorn occupies the upper floors. The lower floors are used for commercial purposes.
Glassman (2024-11-15 23:15:19+00:00): Thanks
Glassman (2024-11-15 17:31:59+00:00): It looks like you acidentally connected a corner of the building you added to an existing building. I fixed it by removing the building that doesn't exist anymore. Can you adjust the building you added to match the building footprint in the bing imagery?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159152268
CrossEyedCat (2024-11-15 21:41:40+00:00): I think I fixed it. I realized that I selected the wrong building. It's hard to tell from an aerial view and I'm still new to it. It should be on the street though next to the bus stop. Let me know how that looks.
Glassman (2024-11-15 23:14:38+00:00): Thanks for fixing it. I added an address to the new bldg. (I'm one that wants bldgs to have addresses.) Also noticed the coffee shop you added. They talk about the Costa Rica experience. I love Costa Rica. We've been so many time and have friends that live there.
Glassman (2024-11-15 17:33:40+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159152313
Glassman (2024-11-15 17:33:48+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159152327
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:12:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
wewime (2024-11-15 10:07:17+00:00): Du hast ein paar wikipedia Links von den place= Knoten gelöscht, aber laut wiki dürfen die dort stehen.
welzheimerwald (2024-11-15 12:51:14+00:00): Die Wikipedia- und Wikidata-Einträge wurden in die zugehörige Grenzrelation verlagert.
wewime (2024-11-15 13:40:45+00:00): Ja das habe ich gesehen, aber warum?
welzheimerwald (2024-11-16 00:18:08+00:00): Weil es hierfür Grenzrelationen gibt. Die Placenodes sind nur die Beschriftungen für das Rendering auf der Karte - ein(e) Stadt/Gemeinde/Stadtbezirk/Ortsteil erstreckt sich aber immer über eine Fläche. Dafür gibt es in ganz Deutschland admin-Boundaries für fast alle Verwaltungsebenen. Um unnötige Redundanz (Doppeltagging) zu vermeiden, wurden die Tags in die Relationen überführt und von den Nodes entfernt.
Herman Lee (2024-11-15 10:32:48+00:00): 本修改集已退回
Glassman (2024-11-15 17:34:13+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159152660
Glassman (2024-11-15 17:36:29+00:00): #TIP: square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q". Also - try to match the roof outline when adding buildings
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159152670
Glassman (2024-11-15 17:39:44+00:00): You added a building around the shell station gas pump area which already had a roof mapped. Can you fix this?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159152680
Glassman (2024-11-15 17:40:26+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

The supermarket already was mapped. Please remove this node
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159152713
Glassman (2024-11-15 17:41:31+00:00): The building outline is much larger than what the imagery shows. The building outline should match the roof. Can you fix?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159152734
Glassman (2024-11-15 17:42:39+00:00): A Jack in the Box fast food is already mapped. Your node is redundant. Please remove.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159152749
Glassman (2024-11-15 17:34:36+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159152764
Glassman (2024-11-15 17:42:55+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159152769
Glassman (2024-11-15 17:45:04+00:00): I believe the unclassified road you added should be a service road. unclassified are basically rural residential streets. Can you fix?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159152973
ThatOneFilipinoExtremeist (2024-11-16 18:24:30+00:00): Hello! Thanks for helping out on where I had edited previously, I am not sure where to place the median but thank you again! (I understand that this is a company that made this change.)
YuliyaShustava_lyft (2024-11-18 14:50:32+00:00): My name is Yuliya, and I am the Quality Control Lead on the OSM team at Lyft.

In alignment with our best practices, we only adjust road geometry in instances of substantial changes. In this particular changeset, the geometry was fixed to correct the road's directionality. As indicated on OSMcha (https://osmcha.org/changesets/157275480), a oneway tag was erroneously applied to a bidirectional part of Veterans Memorial Parkway https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1319371815. Please feel free to reach out if you have any other concerns. Thank you for your contribution and feedback!

Best regards, Yuliya
大山かなめ (2025-08-10 09:24:37+00:00): 昨年の変更へのコメント失礼します。
川島町戸守のローソンは先に建物に施設情報が付与されて（https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1095498224 ）おり、作成されたノードは重複です。
大山かなめ (2025-08-10 09:28:16+00:00): なので、（履歴が継承されるように建物にノードを移して）統合しておきました
PLima785 (2024-11-15 13:07:24+00:00): Obrigado
Baloo Uriza (2025-10-29 21:13:26+00:00): Please don't adapt buildings into landuse like this.  Easiest way to add a dog park if you're not sure how to map it is to just add a single point node, not to decide a building doesn't exist and is now a different shape.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159153734
nevw (2024-11-16 12:38:01+00:00): Hi, unsure why this was a multipolygon.
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=115.81559&lat=-31.91664&zoom=19
It grouped two different addressed buildings together in a mp and was not constructed or tagged correctly so I deleted the mp.
cavillas (2024-11-15 04:29:12+00:00): 消息来源:https://td.gd.gov.cn/dtxw_n/gdjrxw/content/post_4330837.html
cavillas (2024-11-15 04:29:52+00:00): 消息来源2:https://td.gd.gov.cn/dtxw_n/gdjrxw/content/post_4330837.html
Glassman (2024-11-15 17:45:50+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159154315
Glassman (2024-11-15 17:46:08+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159154345
Glassman (2024-11-15 17:46:18+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159154365
Glassman (2024-11-15 17:46:32+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159154387
Glassman (2024-11-15 17:47:11+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.

#TIP: square bldgs by selecting the outline then just type a "q"
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159154409
dmfr (2024-11-19 14:34:29+00:00): Olá! Considerando esta notícia https://observador.pt/2024/11/05/stcp-diz-que-operacao-da-linha-203-no-canal-metrobus-do-porto-e-insegura-e-ineficiente/, tenho muitas dúvidas que os motoristas da STCP estejam a utilizar as vias do Metrobus. Pedia assim o favor de esclarecer esta questão: tens informação que permita indicar de forma clara e inequívoca que os motoristas da STCP estão a usar as vias Metrobus?
PcMouse1 (2024-11-15 05:43:02+00:00): Hi  Sansprathe,

Welcome to OSM and thank you for your contributions! I have noticed that your feature University of Toronto Bank https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12342941119 does not exist in real life. 
In OpenStreetMap we only map what is on the ground; not fictional places or features.

You also added Hospital Memorial on the existing West Lincolin Memorial Hospital. Does a memorial exist on the hospital grounds?

Also please try to use descriptive changeset comments. Nondescriptive changeset comments such as "meow" make it difficult for people to gauge your intentions and to know what your change was about. Proper changetset comments avoid misunderstandings and makes it easier for people to understand what you have done and why.
Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments .

If you have any further questions or if you require resources feel free to reach out to me.

Cheers,
PcMouse1
Glassman (2024-11-15 17:48:06+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159154868
Glassman (2024-11-15 17:48:22+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159154931
Glassman (2024-11-15 17:48:42+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159155040
CurlingMan13 (2024-11-29 00:08:53+00:00): We don't generally map features that no longer exist and have been replaced/built over by new features.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1334141039

Specifically, I can say with 100% certainty that this feature does not exist, if it ever did.  There is no remnants of rail, ties, signals, etc.  There also are no railways visible on aerial imagery where one could be confused about it being seen on old imagery and where we don't want it readded.

You can read more here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Nonexistent_features

Abandoned features should also have some trace remaining.  So segments that go across a motorway where nothing exists shouldn't be mapped either.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:abandoned:*
CurlingMan13 (2024-11-29 05:24:38+00:00): This would be a really good addition to OpenHistoricalMap, which is where historical features that no longer exist can be mapped and live on forever.  Also a really cool place where you can tag start/end dates and watch the expansion and slowdown of rail in the US.

https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/
SomeoneElse (2024-12-02 16:57:58+00:00): See comment on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159793833 - in the case of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1334140977/history at least what would have made most sense to preserve the "railway=abandoned" tag on e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1334140978 , the track that is there now.  The influence of the railway remains on what is there now; railway=abandoned communicates that to current data users.
In addition to that, it also makes sense to contribute "how things used to be" as actual railways to OpenHistoricalMap.
Glassman (2024-11-15 17:50:08+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159155498
Glassman (2024-11-15 17:50:01+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159155632
Glassman (2024-11-15 17:50:27+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159155660
Filip009 (2024-11-15 11:44:44+00:00): Zdravím, tu veci nenahlasujete, ale pridávate ich priamo do mapy.
nevw (2024-11-16 12:28:39+00:00): Hi, multipolygons can't have duplicated sides like this 
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=116.00706&lat=-31.98605&zoom=19
I have fixed
rempshaener (2024-11-15 19:48:42+00:00): Hallo,
genau, das war es.
Weiterhin viel Erfolg.
Viele Grüße
Erik - (2024-11-16 11:00:20+00:00): Danke sehr.
Erik - (2024-11-16 11:00:24+00:00): Danke sehr
aixbrick (2024-11-15 14:19:24+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OSM,
mit "amenity=parking_space" wird ein einzelner Stellplatz (auf einem Parkplatz) markiert. Das ist aber bestimmt nicht das, was du wolltest, oder?
Den Parkplatz gibt es übrigens schon: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17016276.
Gruß
Alberto Floreshn20 (2024-11-17 08:59:15+00:00): Xd
Tommybara (2024-11-21 18:23:32+00:00): https://quochoi.vn/tintuc/Pages/tin-hoat-dong-cua-quoc-hoi.aspx?ItemID=91150
Glassman (2024-11-15 17:51:52+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159157561
Glassman (2024-11-15 17:52:14+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159157739
Glassman (2024-11-15 17:54:26+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159157807
Glassman (2024-11-15 17:55:25+00:00): #TIP: square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159157838