piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
gscholz (2023-09-08 07:13:22+00:00): Hi Бекжан Мусаев,
your recent edits have added several errors regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=68.30120&lat=40.80465&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=140799652

This kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps. Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2023-09-12 05:52:46+00:00): Hi Бекжан Мусаев,
these errors still exist, can I get your feedback here?
Guido
eggie (2023-09-07 15:05:01+00:00): Dag belchdot..
Gebouwomtrekken  krijgen geen adressen. Er zijn al adresnodes.
Svp niet schuiven met de kaart. Dat levert vaak schade op.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-09-07 15:16:27+00:00): Info verplaatst naar adresnode Adresnode 4c hersteld
eggie (2023-09-07 15:17:22+00:00): Adres hersteld... Svp geen adressen verwijderen.
MVG
eggie
LukeAW (2026-05-13 16:52:38+00:00): Given this hasn't meaningfully progressed in years and there's no immediate future where it will continue construction, is it worth removing the construction tags?
chl-osm (2023-09-07 16:10:09+00:00): Bonjour,
je viens de passer à la gare Montparnasse et Pradier (w1059633635) et le bureau de change (w1059385964 : horaires à ajouter Mo-Su 9:30-19:00) sont toujours là et actifs.
Par contre, je confirme : Funso est fermé, a priori Bonport aussi. D'où venaient ces données ?
Marek-M (2023-09-07 10:59:47+00:00): Cześć, tak duża dokładność geometrii nie jest niezbędna. Duża ilość węzłów w obiektach bardzo utrudnia późniejsze edycje.
这里没有鱼 (2023-09-11 05:39:14+00:00): 为什么要修改道路等级？看起来是不对的
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2024-01-09 01:59:53+00:00): 这是驾校内部道路，完全不需要这么高的道路等级
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2024-01-09 02:29:45+00:00): 要知道，motorway是用在高速公路上面的，而不是场区内部道路的。场区内部道路主干路网用unclassified，辅助道路用service就可以了

建议先去多看 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hans:%E4%B8%AD%E5%9B%BD%E6%A0%87%E6%B3%A8%E6%8C%87%E5%8D%97

不然持续这么搞容易让您被封号
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140934893
aixbrick (2023-09-08 07:45:48+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OSM,
durch die Änderung wird aus dem Feldweg ein nur durch Radfahrer nutzbarer. Ist dieser auch so beschildert? Mindestens Fußgänger sind hier sicherlich erlaubt. Ich vermute übrigens, dass der Weg ab und zu auch durch mehrspurige Fahrzeuge genutzt wird: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=50.900964004449&lng=6.3690939009839&z=17&focus=photo&pKey=1220811258707067 (Spuren). Das würde weiterhin für highway=track (Feldweg) sprechen.
Gruß
aixbrick (2023-09-15 08:21:11+00:00): Leider keine Reaktion. Ich habe, auch aufgrund von Hinweisen, einige Korrekturen vorgenommen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141290559. Den Weg habe ich wieder auf hw=track zurückgeändert, aber von der Rübenstraße abgetrennt.
Allroads (2024-11-17 16:07:39+00:00): Heb je dat met alle gedaan? 
Ook die van Centipede?

Is het de bedoeling dat worden afgerond.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11174304271#map=19/52.791620/6.121024

Zou de data coördinaten, die officieel zijn als osm data moeten worden ogevoerd, zowel in Rijksdriehoek en ERTS 89 (Europees) Gezien het wgs84 verloop over de jaren. Notatie Openstreetmapdatabank

Wat was je bron?

Groeten Allroads
lipuma (2025-01-11 16:38:12+00:00): Dit lijkt op een import. Is deze besproken op het forum of gedocumenteerd op de wiki?
Allroads (2025-01-18 20:28:41+00:00): Niet dat ik weet.
aixbrick (2023-09-08 07:51:13+00:00): Was genau bedeutet "Zaun"? Der Weg ist von der Rübenstraße durch einen Zaun getrennt? Du hast nämlich aus dem Poller einen Wendehammer gemacht.
phodgkin (2026-04-11 20:16:07+00:00): Is "Brook Lane Court" correct for the overall collection of buildings? The individual buildings are Broad Lane Court.
eggie (2023-09-07 14:14:52+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 
Feedback...   In OSM hoef je geen adressen toe te voegen. Er zijn al adresnodes.
MVG, 
Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-09-07 14:53:44+00:00): Het adres heb ik weer verwijderd

Groet
eggie
kagebar (2023-09-09 05:48:09+00:00): тег spring позначає джерело, власна назва тут не потрібна. видаляю
kagebar (2023-09-09 05:50:16+00:00): також питання чи ви позначили окреме джерело чи вже позначений струмок
ig44572 (2023-09-11 20:46:55+00:00): тут нанесено джерело, струмок вище цього джерела був пересохший
Metzor (2023-09-07 15:31:27+00:00): Hi Pandoril,

Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-) 

One general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: 

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

 Why? Have a look at the section 
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-15 10:02:40+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11174324633

That is cave offering a shelter, right?

Or is it just a cave and OsmAnd was not allowing to tag this?
Peter Van Geit (2024-03-15 11:06:18+00:00): Yes it s a natural cave offering shelter
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-27 18:11:25+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11174290052 - is falls description of object or is it its actual name?

I edited https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11174324633 to be actually marked as cave entrance

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11174323858 - is its actual name or is it a description?
Peter Van Geit (2024-04-02 09:49:14+00:00): Thanks Mateusz for updating the cave shelter correctly. Will use same tags in future.

Falls / Tree were name tags. Removed the same as I assume names are of little use for these type of objects
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-21 10:29:42+00:00): 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11174316081 - "Cave" is description here, not its actual local name, right?
Peter Van Geit (2024-05-04 16:55:29+00:00): That's correct Mateusz. Earlier I was unaware that the name tag for simple objects (shelter, cave, spring, campsite...) can be omitted
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-09 12:28:48+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11174316081 - would also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dcave_entrance fit there?
Peter Van Geit (2024-05-10 04:37:50+00:00): Updated as natural=cave_shelter and removed name
SpinOff (2024-02-11 21:59:55+00:00): Hej. W polu name podajemy tylko urzędową nazwę ulicy. Poprawiłem już mapę.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Nazwy
bxl-forever (2023-09-07 13:04:28+00:00): Hello,

Nice effort to use UrbisAdm to draw buildings.  May I recommend you zoom a little bit more when drawing buildings, to draw the node on the correct location.

I had to fix your 3 latest edits, because every time the building seemed *grossly drawn* but did not really match the outline.

Happy mapping. ;-)
map per (2023-09-07 15:39:19+00:00): Hello User5456,

are you sure this ATM (1) exists? This place looks like the private property of a company.

Best regards 
map per

(1) https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11174378737
map per (2023-09-11 12:45:53+00:00): English: Why does this ATM only open for one minut every week?

Deutsch: Warum hat dieser Geldatomat nur eine Minute pro Woche geöffnet?
User5456 (2023-09-11 12:51:44+00:00): Atm does not exist,  cant fine the option to remove the tag  :(
map per (2023-09-11 13:22:31+00:00): Ok, thanks, I removed the ATM. Maps.me is a rather bad app for editing OpenStreetMaps data.
eggie (2023-09-07 14:18:00+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 
Feedadback   Let svp op dat je geen landuse met apden en grenzen gaat verbinden. Het naakt de kaart voor nakomende mappers onwerkbaar.
MVG, 
Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-09-07 14:33:20+00:00): De weg heb ik losgemaakt van de landuse
osmdg19 (2023-09-08 09:28:26+00:00): Bedankt voor de feedback en hulp. Ik ga de tips meenemen voor de komende wijzigingen.
eggie (2023-09-07 14:36:10+00:00): Alle begin is moeilijk. Gebouwen worden niet zelf ingetekend in OSM, maar geïmporteerd vanuit het kadaster. Dat gebeurt periodiek, maar je kunt het versnellen middels een verzoek op het forum in het draadje BAG importverzoeken.
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/nl/43
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-09-07 14:49:11+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 
Feedbackk.. Let er wel op dat BING verouderd is op veel plaatsen. Beter PDOK gebruiken.
MVG, 
Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-09-07 14:46:59+00:00): Zonder buildingtag zie je helemaal niets..
Ik heb als voorbeeld hoe zoiets gaat even een import aangevraagd.
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/bag-importverzoeken/3394/1303

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-09-10 11:10:19+00:00): Volgens hun wegsite zit Nh Verzekeringen op nr 820 en is daar al gemapt.
Dit hier is nr 818.. import kadaster.
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/?searchQuery=Dorpsstraat+820&objectId=0416010000250255&theme=BRT+Achtergrond&geometry.x=115926.25450000001&geometry.y=525089.7960000001&zoomlevel=14.33418324679408

Nu geïmporteerd als construction. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-09-07 14:39:30+00:00): Dag OSMdg  
Is het wel een G11 fietspad?
Dan taggen
highway=cycleway
moped=no
mofa=yes
traffic_sign=NL:G11

MVG
eggie
StreetSurveyor (2023-09-08 09:41:47+00:00): This change is not appropriate. There is no gate here. This section is open and should not be private.
HellMap (2023-09-09 14:26:23+00:00): Hi!

Could you please clarify what kind of way is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/997736168 ? You placed many legal access tags on it, so now it says that large (4-wheel) vehicles can pass here, but it's tagged only as a path. Is this perhaps a track or a road? It connects to a sports pitch and a footway, so it seems unlikely cars are allowed to travel here?

Thanks

P. S. I can reply in Latvian.
gscholz (2023-09-08 06:33:20+00:00): Hi Emanuele,
this changeset is one of a series editing a self intersecting way:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=10.32709&lat=44.79235&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1205656417/history

This kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps.
Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
LockOnGuy (2023-09-10 15:59:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted in changeset 140997288 and the changeset comment is: Revert and delete fiction mapping.
woodpeck_repair (2023-11-07 00:02:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 143714119 where the changeset comment is: revert von edits eines users nach selbstlöschung
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-08 04:07:31+00:00): Hallo. Das Tag denotation=landmark ist nur für besonders herausragende Bäume gedacht, nicht für jeden einzelnen! Könnten Sie es bitte von Ihren Bäumen entfernen? (Es sei denn, sie sind alle besonders herausragend!)

Hello. The denotation=landmark tag is only intended to be used on spectacularly outstanding trees, not every one of them! Could you please remove it from your trees? (Unless, of course, they're all particularly outstanding!)
user_20191455 (2023-09-09 20:32:45+00:00): These trees are protected there, so they are actually something special: Ref: Ahornboden - Naturpark Karwendel Tirol
Hungerburg (2023-09-10 21:43:49+00:00): Forumsbeitrag hier https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/landmark-trees-in-ahornboden-naturpark-karwendel-tirol/103652/3
Hungerburg (2023-09-12 23:30:02+00:00): Forum seems to be fine to tag them natural_monument instead, because that is what the local administration considers them, point like features. I though shy from changing all of them blindly, because I do not trust the original mapper to only have mapped the ones that are in fact natural monuments and not just ordinary trees. and by the sheer number of them, I just cannot check each one individually.
LockOnGuy (2023-09-10 15:59:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted in changeset 140997288 and the changeset comment is: Revert and delete fiction mapping.
Rico557 (2023-09-08 11:31:40+00:00): location fix https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140982987
Dodko (2023-09-08 08:05:43+00:00): Rovnaká adresa nemôže byť na dvoch budovách.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/384705067/history
už je na https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/384705018
v katastri je chyba duplicitne, v registri adries duplicita nemôže byť, preto sa vtedy použije poloha z registra adries
kuhni74 (2024-10-01 06:57:49+00:00): is way 1205856342 really a beach?
kuhni74 (2024-10-04 04:55:39+00:00): seems to be an abandoned (?) quarry (sand pit)
habi (2023-09-18 07:29:54+00:00): Ciao Magoto
Can you list an additional source for this change, as no installation nor a 'censoring' of aerial imagery hints to a military installation here.
Greetings,
habi
habi (2023-09-18 07:33:15+00:00): I've been made aware of this user https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3887585, linking to fictious data they have added in Switzerland. The original user already has some reverted changesets where they added fictious data to OpenStreetMap, hence I'm reverting the most improbable changesets until they can cite some proper sources.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141410140
bkr (2023-09-12 14:03:27+00:00): bonjour, pourquoi as-tu mis "construction" ? Selon mes connaissances ce projet est en état d'étude et loin d'être en construction.

A part de ça je pense qu'il serait utile d'ajouter une source pour le tracé. (Surtout pour l'avenir, comme il pourrait y avoir des changements, et avec une source c'est plus facile de reperer quel est le proposé le plus recent)
nnf635 (2023-09-13 06:52:17+00:00): L'évaluation avantages-coûts du tracé ainsi que les coûts pour achever la planification du projet ont été présentés lors de la réunion du comité de pilotage de l'été 2023. Il n'est pas encore « déterminé selon le plan » en raison des accords de financement, mais les calculs des coûts sont terminés. 2037/2038 est la mis en service - ce information est d'entreprise de transport locale Baden-Württemberg.
bkr (2023-09-19 15:42:41+00:00): ok donc faut plutôt mettre « proposed », non ?
connais-tu un lien vers la source où l'on peut voir le tracé ?
bkr (2023-09-19 17:49:48+00:00): du coup il fallait plutôt mettre proposed et non construction.

est-ce que tu as un lien vers cette source où l'on peut voir le tracé ?
Nakaner-repair (2023-09-28 10:07:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 141857025 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets 140940149, 140939363. Constructions have not started yet. Do not map for the renderer. It is too early to map it all!
Kovoschiz (2023-09-07 13:06:11+00:00): Please don't add descriptor labels to `name=` , which is for proper names only. This confuses whether they are named already. `proposed:name=` hjas already been prepared.
gscholz (2023-09-09 06:29:06+00:00): Hi Rhemo,
this changeset has created several errors regarding self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-60.58929&lat=2.54881&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=140939693

This kind o error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps.

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
DressyPear4 (2026-05-13 18:37:52+00:00): A cidade já possuia relações administrativas delimitando os bairros, por que substítuí-las por áreas com landuse=residential?
De onde saiu a fonte dos dados dessas novas geometrias?
Se um bairro não existe mais, por que não remover por completo ao invés de deixar as relações todas quebradas?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140939929
Bienson (2023-09-07 21:17:22+00:00): Eingänge haben normalerweise keine Namen.
MxxCon (2023-09-14 08:35:52+00:00): Why did you delete brand and dcgis tags from this POI?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140939968
habi (2023-09-18 07:35:34+00:00): I've been made aware of this user https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3887585, linking to fictious data they have added in Switzerland. The original user already has some reverted changesets where they added fictious data to OpenStreetMap, hence I'm reverting the most improbable changesets until they can cite some proper sources.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141410209
Marek-M (2023-09-07 19:22:20+00:00): Cześć, proszę o niełączenie landuse z drogami, rzekami i.tp. - utrudnia to późniejsze edycje. Drogi dojazdowe prowadzące do gospodarstw powinny być tagowane przynajmniej jako highway=service
user_5359 (2023-09-07 19:09:18+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful when editing the map data. You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/8254098368/history over 100 meters, so there were problems with the corresponding way. I have moved the point back to its original position.
Piagno (2023-09-15 08:28:53+00:00): Hallo Magoto
Ein anderer Nutzer hat sich gefragt, wofür dieses Versuchsaeral ist. Er kommt von dieser Gegend und er kennt es nicht.
Hast du eine Quelle?
Siehe auch: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3887585
Grüess
habi (2023-09-18 07:25:41+00:00): I've been made aware of this changeset by https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3887585. The original user already has some reverted changesets where they added fictious data to OpenStreetMap.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141409875
Bienson (2023-09-07 21:43:41+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140959523

Falsches Tagging von Gebäudeteilen als eigenständige Gebäude Eintragen von (duplizierten) Adressen an diesen Gebäudeteilen.
Bienson (2023-09-07 21:45:31+00:00): Bitte in StreetComplete eine Fehlermeldung erstellen, wenn nach dem Gebäudetyp eines Gebäudeteils gefragt wird. Bis auf Neubauten sind auch überall in Dortmund alle Adressen bereits eingetragen.
Bienson (2023-09-07 21:43:19+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140959523

Falsches Tagging von Gebäudeteilen als eigenständige Gebäude Eintragen von (duplizierten) Adressen an diesen Gebäudeteilen.
Bienson (2023-09-07 21:43:04+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140959523

Falsches Tagging von Gebäudeteilen als eigenständige Gebäude Eintragen von (duplizierten) Adressen an diesen Gebäudeteilen.
eggie (2025-12-01 14:45:18+00:00): Dag Muerkelmann Zou die doolhof er nog zijn?  Zo te zien niet.

NVG
eggie
muerkelmann (2025-12-01 15:58:39+00:00): Ik weet het niet. Ik ben er al heel lang niet meer geweest.
eggie (2025-12-01 16:18:57+00:00): ..  Het lijkt me een tijdelijk iets. Er zal geen maïs staan nu en komt zoiets terug?
Maar up to you. 😀
Groet..
eggie
canfe (2023-11-16 15:10:01+00:00): Non penso che abbia quel nome, semmai è la description.
Altrimenti una panchina avrà come name= "asse liscio su cui sedersi"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140941601
mini-me (2023-09-08 08:52:17+00:00): А зачем? И почему этот участок набережной превратился в служебную дорогу?
Woazboat (2023-09-10 09:44:15+00:00): The 'club house' you added here is 90m x 70m and there are absolutely no references online to the Royal Baira Country Club. What are your sources for this? Otherwise I'm inclined to believe this doesn't exist and you added nonexistent stuff to the map (again)
habi (2023-09-18 07:31:39+00:00): As @Magoto has been adding a lot of fictious data to OpenStreetMap I think a revert of *this* addition is in order, too.
Until they can cite some credible sources, of course.
habi (2023-09-18 07:32:57+00:00): I've been made aware of this user https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3887585, linking to fictious data they have added in Switzerland. The original user already has some reverted changesets where they added fictious data to OpenStreetMap, hence I'm reverting the most improbable changesets until they can cite some proper sources.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141410125
Branko Kokanovic (2023-09-29 19:47:46+00:00): E, nemoj molim te da prebacujes imena ulaza u cirilicu. Trenutni dogovor sa uvoza adresa je da se unose na latinici, jer nijedna aplikacija ne zna da se snadje sa cirilicom (snalaze se sa imenima ulica, ali ne i sa ovim...)

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/uvoz-adresnog-registra-pravila-tagovanja-adresa-u-srbiji/8915
openstreetmapFelix (2023-09-29 20:24:34+00:00): Vazi, promenicu kad stignem ovo i ako sam jos negde stavio cirilicu. Hvala na korekciji👍
openstreetmapFelix (2023-09-29 20:27:00+00:00): Cekaj, ja kad udjem da editujem ulazi su na latinici (i ne secam se da sam ih unosio ovde na cirilici)
Branko Kokanovic (2023-09-29 20:37:27+00:00): Izmenio sam ja ove sad kad sam ti otkucao, no worries za ove prethodne:) Nego, kažem onako, za ubuduće
openstreetmapFelix (2023-09-29 21:06:49+00:00): Super
A jel to treba kad god je u pitanju kucni broj kod adrese koji sadrzi slovo, cak i kad stavljam Point (npr apoteku)?
Branko Kokanovic (2023-10-01 10:25:06+00:00): Ma da, jer niko ne moze da ih nadje tako:( Kod POI-a je mozda bolje jer ce ljudi da ih traze i po imenu ("Apoteka Beograd"), ali ako neko otkuca "Зорана Ђинђића 123б", uglavnom niko ne pronalazi...

Mi sad unosimo sve adrese po Srbiji, pa se onda primeti sa ovih izvestaja sto imamo za adrese na https://dina.openstreetmap.rs/ar/
gabro00 (2023-09-07 17:33:04+00:00): Szia!
Ilyenkor működik a https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:operator:type
itineris (2023-09-07 21:26:25+00:00): Szia!

Tudom. ;)

Ez most az összes oktatási intézményt térképre vivő projektem első lépése (ld. levlista).
A következő körben fogom összekapcsolni az OSM objektumait az OH listájával (ennek köztes eredménye, hogy most kiket kell még berajzolnom), hogy utána onnan lehessen átvenni további adatokat. Például az üzemeltetőt is. Akár egyházi intézményeknél a konkrét vallást is.

Szóval lesz majd itt operator:type, sőt konkrét operator is.

Üdv:
Ákos
gabro00 (2023-09-08 08:18:44+00:00): A levlista most merre lakik?
itineris (2023-09-08 08:34:05+00:00): Talk-hu@openstreetmap.org

https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-hu
gabro00 (2023-09-08 16:56:37+00:00): Köszi! Nem túl felhasználóbarát ez a formátum.

A sulikat OM azonosító alapján lehet egyszerűbb lenne felvenni, akkor elég csak felrajzolni a körvonalat és majd később szkripttel rá tudod rakni az adatokat.
Egyébként ez hatalmas munka, csak Szegeden heteket el lehet tölteni az intézmények bogarászásával, nemhogy az országban... Szólj, ha tudok valamiben segíteni. Ebből talán lesz valami, nem úgy, mint kami jónak ígérkező rendszeres importjaiból :(
gscholz (2023-09-08 06:09:14+00:00): Hi Rhemo,
this changeset has created several errors regarding self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-60.58929&lat=2.54881&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=140942949

This kind o error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps.

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
eggie (2023-09-07 14:54:53+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 
MVG, 
Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
DaveF (2023-09-08 11:52:55+00:00): Hi
Please don't attach ways to boundaries which don't exist as a physical object on the ground:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1205888556#map=17/51.34893/-2.26991
tomweMapper (2023-09-08 11:58:34+00:00): Hi DaveF, so was my mistake joining the hedge to the cotswold boundary? Sorry about that.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-09-07 17:42:21+00:00): Hi, links are used where traffic is separately channelized like on highway ramps and so on, not in the middle of a junction, I'll revert your change.