piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
VLD549 (2024-01-18 10:30:33+00:00): Hi, could you indicate what De Lijn according to you communicates? It seems that Gent Dampoort is not used anymore (and is on a different location anyway) and it doesn't explain what the name of the stop is on the location you indicate.
Thank you!
multimob (2024-01-18 16:47:31+00:00): Hi there!

Gent Dampoort stops are not only those near the station—the bus station was rearranged quite recently—but also some stops here near the canal.

The 3 stops touched here appear to be correctly located, their ref details and location have a perfect match with official data and they are correctly located on the right-hand side of the road.
* 211804 Gent Dampoort C (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9149594707)
* 210804 Gent Dampoort D1 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9149594709)
* 210805 Gent Dampoort D2 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9149594708)

And, again:
* The "name" tag in OSM is the public name, how it appears on stop signs or urban network map if any.  Large cities such as Brussels or Antwerp, do not prefix the city name on every stop.  Smaller cities (Gent, Brugge, Hasselt…) do.
* "name:De_Lijn" is the field containing the full text string matching the name found on De Lijn’s website, app or GTFS data.  This is the place to store the full name containing appendixes such as "D1" or "Perron 1".
VLD549 (2024-01-24 16:31:49+00:00): Ok, thank you.
Dimacn (2023-12-23 04:54:29+00:00): Пожалуйста, в название пишите только название, а не описание объекта. Описание можно вписать в тег description.
hoserab (2023-12-22 19:08:55+00:00): Once again I have manually reverted your changes to Mini Thni Road. I don't know how many times I have to keep doing this before you either get a clue or bugger off, but *Alberta Highway 133X no longer exists*. There's no signage, and the provincial government doesn't maintain this road as a provincial highway anymore. I have kept the `old_ref=133X` tagging here, but otherwise I am going to keep changing this back every time you touch it.

Please stop ignoring these changeset messages.
Andrew Chadwick (2023-12-22 16:39:25+00:00): ↑ specifically, the curved section to the S of the Churchill Hospital probably isn't used in either direction
pootriarch (2023-12-22 16:11:34+00:00): i filled in the 538 address on the door. this isn't the business's primary address. the business occupies the full frontage of this building, but depth is unknown. 538 should be a door, but that would need an area...?
Yog Sot (2023-12-22 22:18:32+00:00): zamykając przejazd skasowałeś tory kolejowe...
ale zrobiłem undelete, proszę bardzo
ivanbranco (2024-03-25 13:24:29+00:00): Hi BoAbney,

I think it was more correct before. Before the wikimedia_commons linked to an existing file, now it links a non existing category ("This page does not currently exist. You can search for this page title in other pages or create this page.").
Renas Azad (2023-12-22 16:34:02+00:00): wrong changeset comment, not add, but delete two fake points.
aTarom (2023-12-22 20:48:42+00:00): Hola rodrilafu, gracias por editar, cuando puedas revisa este elemento
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11443794176/history
"ref:shop:num"="Lotería"
Si necesitas cualquier ayuda puedes usar los canales de la comunidad
https://t.me/OSMes
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/es/51
Saludos
silversurfer83 (2023-12-22 20:51:27+00:00): Gude :)

die Namen, die du da am Umspannwerk vergeben hast sehen tw. etwas komisch aus. Passt das mit 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen
zusammen?

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145413266
Asterix200 (2023-12-24 09:00:19+00:00): Bitte genauer spezifizieren, was "komisch" aussieht.
Grüße
silversurfer83 (2023-12-24 10:48:35+00:00): Moin

Die beiden Schalthäuser sowie die Kompensationsdrossel sehen aus der Ferne zumindest fragwürdig genug aus um auf den Artikel im Wiki hinzuweisen. Dort steht, dass das "name=*" Feld nicht für rein beschreibende Namen zu verwenden ist. Lies gerne einmal durch den Artikel, wenn er dir nicht geläufig sein sollte.

Ich gehe mal optimistisch davon aus, dass du vor-Ort-Kentnisse hast, auch wenn keine Quellenangabe am CS ist, daher wirst du den Artikel und seine Relevanz am besten beurteilen können.

Bis dahin, schöne Feiertage oder wenigstens ein paar ruhige Tage

Silversurfer83
Asterix200 (2023-12-24 11:28:14+00:00): Das ist richtig. Meine Firma hat die Kompensationsdrossel geliefert und wir haben die transportbedingt demontierten Anbauteile montiert, d.h. wir haben die Drossel aufgerüstet. Die Übergabe der 110kV-Kompensationsdrossel durch mich an den Kunden EAM erfolgte am 21.12.2023. Das kleine Gebäude, welches man bei Bing und Co. am Platz der Drossel sieht, ist auf die andere UW-Straßenseite gewechselt. Die Drossel steht jetzt auf einem Fundament, welches gleichzeitig eine große Ölwanne ist. Der Hauptbetreiber der UW-Anlage ist die Tennet. Die EAM Netze GmbH ist Besteller der Drossel und Mitbenutzer der UW-Anlage.
Leider unterscheidet OSM nicht zwischen Drossel und Transformator. Eine Drossel ist jedoch kein Transformator. Das wissen die Elektrotechnik-Unwissenden / Laien jedoch leider nicht.
Ich hoffe, damit die Fragen beantwortet zu haben, wenn es auch nicht in meiner Natur liegt, mich vor jedem rechtfertigen zu müssen.
silversurfer83 (2023-12-24 11:48:21+00:00): Danke. Sehr ausführlich. Ein simples "survey" in der Quellenangabe wäre ausreichend.

Demnach schließe ich, dass wir den node nicht so nennen sollten, wie er aktuell genannt nicht. Wenn dir daran gelegen ist, dass sauber hinterlegt ist, dass es eine Drossel ist, dann kannst du das im Feld "description=*" tun oder du führst einen passenden tag ein. 

Du musst dich hier auch nicht "rechtfertigen" sondern nur sachlich auf meine Nachfrage zu einem Mappingthema in dieser Änderung antworten. Dafür ist die Änderungssatzdiskussion da und unser Gespräch hier hat in meinen Augen ergeben, dass die Namen so nicht genutzt werden sollten.
lololailo (2023-12-23 16:39:37+00:00): Hola, has añadido lo que parece un camping o algo similar pero no has añadido la etiqueta correspondiente con lo cual no aparecerá en ningún sitio tu aportación, además el formato de nº de teléfono es incorrecto y el website tambien. Te aconsejo que te informes en como hacer en https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/ . Osmand tampoco es la mejor herramienta para añadir información al mapa. Un saludo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145413320
Dimacn (2023-12-23 05:08:34+00:00): Здравствуйте. Добавленная вами дорога имеет некорректный статус. Правильнее её отметить как highway=track - сельскохозяйственная или просёлочная дорога. Пожалуйста изучите классификацию дорог в OSM - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Highway_classification  Во-вторых, пожалуйста пользуйтесь спутниковыми картами Esri, они намного новее чем Bing, которыми пользуетесь вы. Bing в наших краях очень старые. Соответственно дорога которую вы нарисовали в настоящий момент проходит не совсем так.
hoserab (2023-12-22 19:12:44+00:00): As far as I can tell every change you've made here to the roads at the Highway 8/Stoney interchange is a complete fabrication. It's all nonsense, there's no tunnel underneath the road carrying Lower Springbank Rd for example: that's complete BS.

GregHeffley275, being that your changes are falsehoods and junk, and given you've been completely ignoring every attempt to communicate with you, I have reported you as a vandal.

Can someone else revert this changeset? Or at least the changes to the roads? Perhaps the additional building and other ways are worth saving, but the roads changes are pure garbage.
022 (2023-12-27 01:32:14+00:00): Hello there, I have partially reverted some elements of this changeset, in changeset 145554430. I appreciate the additions of buildings and driveways to the area, but please stop adding things that pretty clearly do not exist. Thanks!
tyfi (2023-12-22 17:05:51+00:00): No other objects or tags were touched.
Aleks-Berlin (2023-12-23 15:33:30+00:00): Hi BoAbney,
please read the OSM wiki !
wikimedia_commons=Cat.. not cat..
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikimedia_commons#Examples
You did this many times, see 
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/wikimedia_commons#values
Thanks, Alex
BoAbney (2023-12-23 19:30:09+00:00): Thanks for the heads up! All have been corrected.
VLD549 (2024-05-01 06:35:47+00:00): Hi, could you provide a source with a link to confirm the name change from Pandarosaweg to Bittere Cassaveweg ?
I don't receive any search results with these terms. 

Thank you in advance!
tyfi (2023-12-22 17:18:21+00:00): No other objects or tags were touched in order to make this a clean revert if needed.
tyfi (2023-12-22 17:20:46+00:00): The highway=unclassified tag is used for roads/routes that are too minor for systematic designation, and they are usually (not required to be) maintained by local government.

SSRs, on the other hand, are designated, signed with letters, and maintained by the state DOT.
tyfi (2023-12-22 17:22:24+00:00): (I would actually be in favor of using tertiary for numbered county roads, too, but that's another topic.)
NorthCrab_upload (2023-12-22 17:30:29+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/427916264

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
woodpeck_repair (2024-06-15 22:30:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 152740214, 152740288, 152740274, 152740234, 152740192, 152740169, 152740167, 152740249, 152740178 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions by Hamilton 44/Delta Evas ALL, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16207
woodpeck_repair (2024-06-15 22:29:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 152740214, 152740288, 152740274, 152740234, 152740192, 152740169, 152740167, 152740249, 152740178 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions by Hamilton 44/Delta Evas ALL, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16207
augil (2023-12-22 19:30:36+00:00): that's how the boundary should look like, as it follows the center of the road. was it because the roads were not split that you saw it as a problem? if not you can see the same type of border here https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2064631022
user_177389 (2023-12-22 21:51:46+00:00): The user who drew this thought something of it. Use an editor with error checking and you'll see.
augil (2023-12-22 22:12:33+00:00): so I should split it then, cause that's the most accurate way of doing the boundary.
augil (2023-12-22 22:13:48+00:00): also does the same error pop up in the example I sent?
user_177389 (2023-12-22 22:39:35+00:00): Yes. Some renderers cannot decide where the boundary line continues and therefore cannot form an area.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-12-22 18:20:49+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3780206
hoserab (2023-12-22 19:20:22+00:00): Can someone local to the Edmonton area review these changes? Judging from aerial imagery the changes to Stony Plain Road are just made-up crap.
Viajero Perdido (2023-12-28 21:02:00+00:00): Coincidentally, I drove those roads yesterday in both directions.  I had a look in achavi.  The only flaw I can see is the removal of the oneway:yes in the westbound part of the interchange.  This is all one-way westbound, as eastbound traffic gets routed along 100 Ave to the south.
Viajero Perdido (2023-12-28 21:06:52+00:00): On second glance...  These roads are mature, no construction, so why are we creating motorway roads now?  They would not have been missing from the map without being noticed long ago.  Was something deleted in another changeset, and replaced in this one?  Danger, don't mess with major roads without extreme caution; routing breaks.
paulbrunner (2024-01-17 22:46:54+00:00): Hi Đuro Jiří

Thanks for checking all those stores. The "Spazio Conad" (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2477687922) now has as opening hours "Mo-Su 21:00". Many stores around it are open "Mo-Su 09:00-21:00", should this also be the value for Spazio Conad? Didn't want to just assume, so I thought I'd ask.

All the best and happy mapping,
Paul
Đuro Jiří (2024-01-18 07:29:38+00:00): Ciao Paul,
è così, anche Spazio Conad ha orario di apertura Lu-Do 09:00-21:00, corretto. 
Grazie, saluti e buon divertimento
r37 (2024-07-12 15:44:57+00:00): Possible note for the future, I think mapping a way with both `highway=construction` and `bicycle=designated` can imply that the way is still accessible by bike while under construction. Or at least that looks to be the case going off of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=construction#How_to_map_the_start_of_a_road_repair_or_reconstruction

Either that or I've been using some non-compliant routing software
NeisBot (2023-12-28 21:41:26+00:00): Hello,
 thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.

Thanks!

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
NorthCrab (2023-12-22 19:26:55+00:00): :^)
MrSledge (2024-06-11 15:26:55+00:00): Suspicious tag combination - boundary=administrative together with landuse=residential (1)
(Rationale: It is pointless to have overlapping, conflicting landuses.)

Also, add tag name to the relation whenever possible. In this case "Guachipilín"(name of the corresponding Node).
silversurfer83 (2023-12-22 20:55:47+00:00): Gude General :)

zwei Bemerkungen/Fragen/...

- du hast hier an ein paar Abschnitten
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/386866668
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/166639946
eine Höchstgeschwindigkeit (maxspeed=*) eingetragen. An beiden Abschnitten sind aber schon richtungsspezifische Höchstgeschwindigkeiten hinterlegt. Guck dir das bitte mal an und dann wäre es super, wenn wir wissen, was jetzt gilt.

- die App (Go Map) scheint nicht wirklich nach einem Änderungssatzkommentar zu fragen. Das ist schade. Bitte beschreibe deine Änderung doch so, dass man schnell erfassen kann, WAS du WARUM geändert hast. Das hilft jetzt und auch in Zukunft. Details hier
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145418209
Hufkratzer (2023-12-22 20:22:34+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1233395171 looks like a riding arena, similar to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1216687976. So why did you tag it differently?
tyfi (2023-12-22 20:23:29+00:00): Sorry, that should read "primary_link" rather than "tertiary_link".
lefuturiste (2023-12-23 10:36:00+00:00): effectivement, c'est plusieurs choses :+1:
grimpeur78 (2023-12-23 10:52:45+00:00): Oui, je ne pense pas qu'il est nécessaire de énumérer chaque modification s'il s'agit de plusieurs petites choses. Si c'est une modification plus grande sur un objet, c'est autre chose bien sûr. Mais au vacances, que fais toujours un peut ici et là à côté de mes chemins et principalement sur le telephone.
lefuturiste (2023-12-23 11:02:31+00:00): Il n'y a pas de mal tant que c'est pas tout les jours
hoserab (2023-12-22 21:09:52+00:00): I have manually reverted this changeset, and parts of changesets 142207752 and 142989112; there is no connection between Kingsview Road, Range Road 293A and the new 40th Avenue interchange
022 (2023-12-25 06:24:12+00:00): I'm pretty sure this is just Evpac back at it again with more egregiously bad edits. It seems like there's still a few things that need to be reverted I'll do that when I have time but this is exhausting. Has this guy been reported yet?
hoserab (2023-12-27 04:08:39+00:00): Hi 022, apologies for the belated reply. Yes I have already reported this user. Twice, in fact.
misterte (2023-12-23 18:09:25+00:00): Hi,
gibt es hier wirklich 2 Kindergärten ? way 318220201, 1233414764
Yog Sot (2023-12-22 22:00:09+00:00): było w trakcie naprawiania po konfliktach. Zrobiłes inaczej niż poprawiłem, bo zgodnie z granicami działek i powinno być z planem zagospodarowania przestrzennego, ale nie mam na to już siły ;] 
Hucznie otwarta inwestycja przyciąga edytorów jak lep na muchy ;}
Hufkratzer (2023-12-23 18:36:04+00:00): Hi,
bzgl. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1233419522 :
Ein Schuppen (building=shed) ist wohl kaum eine Reitanlage (leisure=horse_riding). Im Wiki steht zu Tag leisure=horse_riding : "Die Anlage sollte das ganze Gelände einschließen: Pferdeställe, Reitplätze, Reithalle, andere zugehörige Gebäude oder Paddocks ..." Wenn https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/205040125 (name=Reiterhof Hüllen) dieses Gelände ist, dann sollte das leisure=horse_riding da dran. Ich habe aber keine Ahnung, ob dieser Reiterhof Hüllen noch existiert.
Der Schuppen ist auch ziemlich groß. Falls es eine Reithalle ist, könnte man ihn umtaggen zu building=riding_hall.
Vgl.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure=horse_riding
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:building=riding_hall
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/150892519 (Beispiel)
PPete2 (2026-06-21 07:12:41+00:00): Servus, schaust du dir bitte https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5351635 an, einem von dir eingezeichneten Pfad, danke!
Eman_Mehrez (2023-12-24 14:07:01+00:00): Hello ABDULLAH M ALMAHDI,
I noticed you reverted my edits and added two links that do not appear in all satellite images.
and the last image I used "Maxar SecureWatch Imagery 2023-11-19"
Could you please provide us with the source you used to add these links?
Links:
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/1233421860
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/1233421861
Regards
Eman_Mehrez
literan (2024-01-19 13:23:50+00:00): получился дубль пиццерии (см. соседнее здание) https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/109081782
mcliquid (2023-12-23 07:45:29+00:00): Hey there,

I have a cool tip for you: keep your changesets local.

Trust me, it will save you a lot of trouble and make your reviewers happy. Here’s what you need to do:

• stick to one area at a time (like a city, a district or a province)

• don’t cross the border (unless you have a passport)

• upload/save your changes before you hop to another place

Why? Because size matters when it comes to changesets. Don’t believe me? Check out this wiki page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for listening, have a wonderful day and enjoy mapping!
limes11 (2023-12-23 18:44:43+00:00): Also, 

Un Lavoro da Cani

is a dog school, right?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Danimal_training
Gigoachef (2023-12-23 19:30:54+00:00): Yes, that's correct. It's a dog training centre.
Sebastian | Yanosik (2024-03-27 12:56:24+00:00): Cześć!
Dlaczego droga trzeciorzędna w budowie została zdegradowana do ścieżki dla pieszych? Podaj proszę źródło zmian.
jmarchon (2023-12-23 22:34:01+00:00): 'Hello!
Looks like all the buildings you added here were already on OSM. I'"'"'ve reverted this changeset.'

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145452411
jmarchon (2023-12-23 22:37:03+00:00): Oops, not sure what happened with the apostrophes there :-)
eggie (2023-12-28 16:47:41+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-12-28 16:49:51+00:00): Je politie post heb ik weer verwijderd. Die was al gemapt hier.
MVG
eggie
kidneyspr (2023-12-25 02:14:24+00:00): Puse el nombre de antes como el principal ya que todavía dice HIMA en el hospital y en los letreros, según https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Map_what's_on_the_ground
BigKev97 (2024-02-22 23:13:02+00:00): Ahora es Hospital Pavía.
kidneyspr (2024-03-04 03:33:19+00:00): Cierto, pero le quité el guión porque no aparece ni en la página ni en los letreros.

Sobre "Pavía", veo que ni los periódicos ni la página del hospital son consistentes con la tilde.  ¿Sabes si es oficial el uso de la tilde en el nombre?
jmsbert (2023-12-22 23:26:05+00:00): typo: the correct project number is #hotosm-project-15602
CurlingMan13 (2023-12-22 22:54:55+00:00): This changeset mainly removes "woods" that consisted of individual trees mapped as their own areas.
jmsbert (2023-12-22 23:25:53+00:00): typo: the correct project number is #hotosm-project-15602
jmsbert (2023-12-22 23:25:44+00:00): typo: the correct project number is #hotosm-project-15602
jmsbert (2023-12-22 23:25:22+00:00): typo: the correct project number is #hotosm-project-15602
fititnt (2023-12-23 22:59:17+00:00): Se está falando da https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1211698714/history criada por usuário "wallace freire", esse não é mapeador local. 

Em uma busca em mecanismos de busca, esse nome aparece como relacionado a um grupo Geodesastres/YouthMappers (https://www.instagram.com/geodesastres/) que é da UFRA https://ufra.edu.br que fica em Belém, no Pará (este nó aqui https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/274387317).

O cálculo de distância da UFRA até esse prédio https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_car&route=-1.45862%2C-48.43571%3B-29.41446%2C-51.96161#map=5/-15.993/-50.425

> Itinerário
> Distância: 3745km. Duração: 52:43.

Isso são quase 4 mil quilometros de distância. Sim, ele é "mais local" do que pessoas do outro lado do mundo, mas isso ainda não substitui trabalho de pessoas que são da cidade em si

Sim, vi que o prédio do lado (que é um dos que eu citei como exemplo) foi resolvido. Só faltaria o resto da região inteira
aceman444 (2023-12-31 17:56:13+00:00): Na zaklade coho zmena Downtown na Nove nivy? Wikipedia ma stale povodny nazov. Co keby ste tie povodne nazvy nechavali aspon ako alt_name, alebo old_name (ak je to starsi nazov, co uz neplati). Treba zachovat nejaku historiu alebo vsetky nazvy pod akymi to ludia poznaju, lebo inak su mnohe vase zmeny velmi divne. Naopak prave nazvy z historickych map, ktore pridavate, nebude nikto poznat.
Filip009CZ (2024-10-31 14:07:53+00:00): Zdravím, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6765898905/ #mapycz user report #2676928 "Názov škovránčie pole je nepresný. Mal by tam byť Názov Dvory" aj podľa ZBGIS som názov Škovránčie pole nikde nenašiel. Viete zaručiť, že sa jedná o aktuálny a zaužívaný názov?
aceman444 (2025-02-22 00:40:26+00:00): Podla toho co pise inde ide skor o nejake 100-rocne mapy, s nejasnou relevanciou pre dnesnu dobu (neviem ci niekto tie nazvy pouziva a pozna).

A tiez napr.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/966591074 som zakreslil planovany projekt "Nove Lido", urcite nejde o ziadne Elyzium, ktore je uz zakreslene na bode https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11445334213 . Takze tiez trochu opatrnejsie.
tyfi (2023-12-22 23:47:32+00:00): Some of these segment had directional prefixes, too, but that's not something MoDOT does afaik.
arjunaraoc (2023-12-29 08:42:16+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145423546
Andrea Musuruane (2024-01-12 11:25:42+00:00): Ciao e benvenuta su OSM. Quelli indicati non possono essere building=detached perché non sono abitazioni indipendenti (ovvero che non hanno muri in comune con altri edifici). Ripristino la situazione. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145423653
danieldegroot2 (2024-03-22 12:39:33+00:00): Hey Dynamene,

I am changing the species tag you added to 'genus'.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149011719

As you can see from 'genus:en', it is actually a genus. A species is i.e. 'Fagus Sylvatica' (European Beech);
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q146149

Your changes
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=145423979

Regards,

Daniel
Dynamene (2024-03-22 13:08:58+00:00): Oh right, I understand the mistake now. Sorry for this and thanks for alerting me, I won’t do the mistake again.
tyfi (2023-12-23 00:33:54+00:00): And I bumped it from unclassified to tertiary.
tyfi (2023-12-23 00:45:41+00:00): I did not actually reclassify anything here. That text was left over in my JOSM history.