piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ManuelB701 (2025-12-14 19:20:48+00:00): Just FYI: OSM puts a major focus on de facto rather than de jure so `place=*` isn't necessarily about places which legally exist (although the legality is one strong point of existence and partially affects the `place` value, see `place=suburb`) but simply any known named location, populated or otherwise.

Even when a place has been officially dissolved, its physical characteristics are still there (e.g. you still have amenities named "Kagwe") unless it has been wiped from existence.
Archer470 (2025-12-14 22:14:01+00:00): Anyone can decide to name something. Legal boundaries and names exist for a reason. That's why the amenities remain, while the boundaries that classified it as a general location were dissolved.

The amenities are part of Kagwe Shopping Center.
https://kmhfl.health.go.ke/public/facilities/127ee118-baae-4650-8bbc-d697f36eebc8

Located in Lari Sub-County, in Kiambu County.
ManuelB701 (2025-12-15 06:07:18+00:00): This is not a boundary, though! All you did is to scrub a place from existence just because of its legal status (admittingly the STRONGEST but not the ONLY factor) disregarding other ways of determining places (it's even worse on Wikimedia where you decided to scrub the place from history with a deletion request, disregarding that the place did in fact exist at one point, something you admit yourself).
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-15 11:26:26+00:00): "Sources: " can you link those sources?
Taya_S (2025-12-15 11:33:27+00:00): Revered questionable removals. See: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/wikidata-osm-cross-project-vandalism-report/139298

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175955333
Archer470 (2025-12-17 19:45:05+00:00): No one has provided any proof otherwise. 
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/harrassment-from-data-working-group-moderators-and-yamatoshiya/139433
julcnx (2025-11-28 03:22:52+00:00): Thanks a lot for your contributions! Just a friendly tip: try to keep your changes smaller, like focusing on one country at a time. 
Also adding a good changeset description will help a lot others understand what you changed.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
likeToTravel (2025-11-28 04:15:41+00:00): oh shoot i thought i made this 2 changesets sorry @julcnx
ScrawnyMeowth1 (2025-11-28 17:36:32+00:00): Hello likeToTravel,

Please try and add descriptive changeset comments before you submit a changeset. This helps others to review your changeset and see how you've been contributing. From reading your comment on this changset, I have no idea what edits were made.

Thanks,
Kovoschiz (2025-11-28 07:32:02+00:00): If you are doing this, you would need to correct the `start_date`
vectorial8192 (2025-11-30 11:20:43+00:00): This is a good point. I can see `start_date` should be corresponding to "abandoned building" but not simply "building" itself.

Improved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175308323
Chief Mike Kouklis (2025-12-01 08:25:36+00:00): Q: Should the surviving house be marked?
 "abandoned: No"
vectorial8192 (2025-12-01 09:12:02+00:00): @Chief

imo don't mark ref=H (the surviving building) as `abandoned=no`.

The situation: ref=H is evacuated, together with ref=A through ref=G. No one is inside ref=H other than perhaps gov staff.

The problem:

With the evac in place, it feels like ref=H should get `disused=no` instead of `abandoned=no`. However, because ref=H is healthy, we locally expect the ref=H evac to be temporary, which means adding `disused=no` does not seem to make sense.

A more accurate description would be ref=H is now in some sort of undetermined state, in some sort of limbo.

See if it helps understand the situation.
vectorial8192 (2025-12-01 09:15:16+00:00): Oh, and, as per https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5070064 , we still need someone to go look at how the building is like because it's covered in scaffolding, but for now I am quite hopeful ref=H is entirely unaffected.
Taya_S (2025-12-15 11:33:28+00:00): Revered questionable removals. See: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/wikidata-osm-cross-project-vandalism-report/139298

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175955333
TriangleMaple (2025-11-28 02:41:24+00:00): I've noticed some noted 6.6 kW or 6.4 kW, however I'm not sure if that was due to a car already charging there or slight difference in models or how they were powered
norgis (2025-12-04 13:57:41+00:00): Why did you add all these irrelevant tags to the bus stops? It's fairly obvious that ferries don't serve bus stops, as well as lightrails and other stuff we don't really have in Norway. This just adds noise to the map data...
arjunaraoc (2025-11-29 08:56:17+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175222287
ieguy3 (2025-11-28 04:10:49+00:00): https://uploads.itd.sbcounty.gov/gis/parcelmaps/046207.pdf
user_5359 (2025-11-28 08:34:05+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Thanks for your addition!
The keys must be entered one per line.
Frans S (2025-12-21 16:52:59+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
A remark. Most buildings are fair rectangular. sometimes covered a bit by trees. Map them as a rectangular, and folllow the rooflines including the extensions etc.
Square each building with the Q key while selected.
KennyDap (2025-11-28 06:24:50+00:00): Vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175224819
KennyDap (2025-11-28 06:24:27+00:00): Vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175224808
Hopla57 (2026-06-11 16:24:28+00:00): Hello,
Petite question car je ne connais pas le coin : c'est normal que les `name` sont passés du français en corse ? Les plaques de rue ont été changées et sont en corse ?
À+
redd (2025-11-30 22:59:39+00:00): Hello Nar_arch,
it seems that the metric you are using for a "too short highway" uses wrong assumptions. It is a long established OSM practice to connect ways to the areas which they are crossing. It is also common practice to not "glue" parking areas to buildings.  

I therefore do not agree with your change. You disconnected the highway=service from the amenity=parking. They shared a node previously.

 Please revert this change. 

Thanks,

redd
Nar_ach (2025-12-03 03:56:25+00:00): Hi redd, thank you for sharing your comments on the changeset. Road segments shorter than a threshold value are flagged in the process, but it doesn’t mean that we should remove them all the time. 
Here I have extended the short segment to capture the driveway within the parking area. My proposal would be simply to glue the driveway and the parking area, instead of performing a revert. 

Please let me know if you agree with this and want me to update the map accordingly.
redd (2025-12-03 22:58:59+00:00): hi Nar_arch,
yes, the highway=service and the  amenity=parking should be connected. The were previously sharing the same node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11756706495/ which you deleted. 

If you do not want to revert your changeset then you can add a new node or recover this node to connect the both.

redd
NeisBot (2025-12-13 20:51:28+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Plumbing services in Toronto"
NeisBot (2025-12-13 20:51:28+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-12-13 21:03:30+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/175293938
StC (2025-11-29 10:31:26+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre qui passe par là. Je m'occupe de la réparation.
MacDony (2025-11-29 10:40:53+00:00): Ok, merci et désolé
Bonne journée
Denis
GeeMaps! (2025-12-14 22:44:24+00:00): Hello. Could you please tell us why you've removed the school tag, & replaced it with a mangrove swamp!
Archer470 (2025-12-14 23:15:13+00:00): Thank you for pointing that out. Looks like an accident, seeking correction there.
SomeoneElse (2025-11-29 12:43:03+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
You've extended https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/46343328 here up towards the north of Callendar.  Previously, e.g. at https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2gqC , the national park boundary followed the river.  Now there's a duplicate line that you can see at https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1957067#map=12/56.2578/-4.1927 .  I'm guessing that your route west of Cambusmore Quarry is correct, but I've no idea of north of there.
When you've finished editing you can check it with the JOSM validator (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/SomeoneElse/diary/406398 for help with that).
Best Regards,
Andy
PS Any questions, please don't hesitate to ask!
eggie (2025-11-28 08:28:08+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback In OSM gebruiken we de adresnodes om op bij te taggen als het 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-11-28 08:30:19+00:00): Wanneer het de gebouwnaam betreft kan het prima, maar dan de dubbele vermelding op de adresnode beter verwijderen.
MVG
eggie
RAL_ (2025-11-28 07:49:44+00:00): I meant south
anirud (2025-11-28 07:40:44+00:00): Na krátkom úseku, ktorý som označil ako access=no, je osadená značka zákaz vjazdu. Na odbočke z cesty 1345 je značka "slepá ulica". Nie je tam fyzická bariéra, iba spomaľovač, ale prechod nie je legálny.
flohoff (2025-11-29 17:20:15+00:00): Moin,
cool das du mit mappst. Ich hab hier den changeset gesehen weil der das routing verändert hat. Der Durchgangsverkehr von Gestringen nach Westen ging durch Fabbenstedt:

Das hier zeigts - Rot alt - Grün neu.

https://osm.zz.de/routeqa/?rid=605203,1164908#52.36252,8.59506,15z

Ich habe da noch ein bisschen nachkorrigiert weil natürlich die Ortsdurchfahrt Fabbenstedt nicht 70 ist sondern 50 bzw vor dem Altenheim sogar 30.

So long

Flo
MaciekMma (2025-11-28 09:31:00+00:00): jednokierunkowa od listopada 2025 zeby ograniczyc chaos na parkingu wzdluz tej ulicy
Dodko (2025-11-28 09:16:26+00:00): Prečo
layer=-1 ?
a ani adresa nesedí.
tucnaaaK (2025-11-28 09:25:14+00:00): layer = -1 bolo omylom. To som si nevšimol.

Adresa však bola správna.
Dodko (2025-11-28 09:37:30+00:00): Mesto budove pridelilo adresu
Bratislava-Ružinov 19398
je na liste vlastníctva aj v registri adries.

https://zbgis.skgeodesy.sk/mapka/sk/zakladna-mapa/detail/ra_adresne_body/0/14534716

https://zbgis.skgeodesy.sk/mapka/sk/kataster/detail/kataster/parcela-c/804274/9200
Dodko (2025-11-28 09:39:41+00:00): Prístavná 10 je celkom inde
https://zbgis.skgeodesy.sk/mapka/sk/zakladna-mapa/detail/ra_adresne_body/0/14440375
eggie (2025-12-07 14:23:16+00:00): 	Paaltje Leusdenhof is niet conform afspraken binnen OSM.
Wellicht heb je hier iets aan hoe met namen omgegaan kan worden.
Good practice   
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Good_practice

Probeer je er svp iets meer in  te verdiepen.

MVG
eggie
Frans S (2025-12-04 13:44:58+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
 * Please accurately outline all buildings.

Check the task instructions for the full requirements.

Keep on mapping!
mueschel (2025-11-28 19:26:58+00:00): Hi,
please check the auto-completion in your editor. It's "building", not "buiding". I fixed a few dozens already.
JFL-75 (2025-11-29 09:07:28+00:00): Hi could give more precision about the 'auto - completion in your editor' because I have difficulties to understand the meaning. Thanks in advance.
mueschel (2025-11-29 09:28:05+00:00): Since a couple of days your adding "buiding:condition" tags with the mentioned spelling mistake. 

Either you mistype it every time, or your editor adds it automatically. Either way, just keep an eye on the missing 'l'.
JFL-75 (2025-11-29 09:29:51+00:00): OK got it .  I am very sorry , the spelling mistake has been fixed.
Regards and thanks for the alert.
Supaplex (2025-11-29 10:48:40+00:00): 寫在自己編輯摘要是沒用的，要去對方的去留言才行
Kovoschiz (2025-11-30 10:02:23+00:00): Please don't remove `is_in:suburb=` here. Only unstructured `is_in=` is deprecated, not `is_in:*=` structured. There's no `boundary=administrative` to replace it.
A67-A67 (2025-12-07 12:46:18+00:00): Hier ontbreekt de tag barrier=bollard bij de paaltjes. Daarnaast is de name-tag niet bedoeld voor beschrijvingen als 'Paaltjes Leksmondplein'.

Ik heb het verbeterd.
pinetree29 (2025-12-22 12:13:23+00:00): The roads around OIST parking building are not one-way. (Ways: 1454368836 and 443247096)
eggie (2025-11-28 09:00:38+00:00): Dag 00  
Je zou eens een opmerking op de kaart kunnen zetten dat die naam nooit is opgenomen in de BGT/BAG.
Ze zouden het dan (wel of niet )kunnen aanpassen.
https://www.verbeterdekaart.nl/#?geometry.x=151163.84&geometry.y=435818.06&zoomlevel=13.41
MVG
eggie
Supaplex (2025-11-30 14:50:33+00:00): the "buildings" you draw are only tombs inside the cememtery, no need to tracing
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175228747
eggie (2025-11-28 09:05:06+00:00): Je zou een opmerking op de kaart van het Kadaster kunnen zetten.
https://www.verbeterdekaart.nl/#?geometry.x=156160.54&geometry.y=435782.22&zoomlevel=13.01

Het pad ontbreekt zelfs op de kaart.
MVG
eggie
Frans S (2025-12-04 14:17:40+00:00): Welcome to the tasking manager and thanks for mapping buildings in this task.

More work is required to complete this task and ensure that it is well mapped:
 * Please map individual buildings without collecting multiple nearby buildings into a single object.
 * Please accurately outline all buildings.
 * Buildings should have their corners squared.
 * Buildings should not overlap other buildings and features.

Keep on mapping!
hahae (2025-11-29 00:27:00+00:00): 您好，之前给您留言过了，请问您收到了吗？已经消失的村庄似乎不建议在 OSM 添加的。
（不是针对这条更改）
Frans S (2025-12-12 15:25:56+00:00): Thanks for mapping on this project.
I noticed that you mainly draw rectangles roughly around buildings.
Not follow the rooflines, which gives an idea of the shape of a house,
Please map more accurately !
Best regards
Frans S (2025-12-12 16:18:36+00:00): Check this webpage to see the changes I had to make.
Best regards

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=175852239
literan (2025-11-29 10:19:53+00:00): на съезде с Дмитровки на внутренний МКАД нет стационарной камеры. Машины ЦОДД мы не наносим
empty_child (2025-11-28 12:02:50+00:00): Hello gaga15,
What do you mean? This road (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100744345) was closed?
Frans S (2025-12-04 14:11:32+00:00): Welcome to the tasking manager and thanks for mapping buildings in this task.

More work is required to complete this task and ensure that it is well mapped:
 * Please map individual buildings without collecting multiple nearby buildings into a single object.
 * Please accurately outline all buildings.

Keep on mapping!
vojtechzaboril (2025-12-15 13:28:33+00:00): Tento úsek není silnicí první třídy. Podle https://geoportal.rsd.cz/apps/silnicni_a_dalnicni_sit_cr_verejna/ se jedná o nájezd na dálnici (motorway_link) a skutečné značení také neukazuje, že by tomu bylo jinak. Upravil jsem zpět na motorway_link
au-btcmap‑onboarding (2025-11-28 09:14:50+00:00): Was about to update that.
au-btcmap‑onboarding (2025-11-28 09:20:44+00:00): This wasn't a POI. Apologies, was about to update with cafe name and correct coordinate.
osmviborg (2025-11-29 07:13:07+00:00): Hej, adresser i OSM tilføjes automatisk fra 'Danmarks Adresser', hjemmelavede adressepunkter accepteres ikke. Undlad venligst at tagge POI'er med adresser. https://lgms.nl/p/osm/cached-wiki/?page=Da:Adresser
eggie (2025-11-28 09:28:15+00:00): Dag Frills..
Wellicht even hier kijken
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dfuneral_directors

Postcode format aangepast

MVG
eggie
Frills (2025-11-28 13:29:34+00:00): Ik vermoed dat de 'shop' tag niet de juiste indruk wekt. Het is geen 'funeral parlour' en er worden geen diensten gehouden. Het is slechts het kantoor van een uitvaartbedrijf.
eggie (2025-11-28 13:33:00+00:00): Oke.. prima
gscscnd (2025-11-30 09:47:49+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1454375745
Na parkingi jest dedykowany tag:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=parking
Dawid2849 (2025-11-28 09:44:14+00:00): Is this bridge open now? It was closed for quite a while
Jo sóc jo (2025-11-28 14:52:05+00:00): Bon dia, si l'objectiu és afegir un nom local a la Riera de Canet, potser seria millor posar-ho com a loc_name a la via https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/363573672#map=14/42.02298/2.72981&layers=N . I el punt quilomètric (milestone) aquest que has afegit, existeix?
Salut i mapes.
Itz's (2025-11-28 09:33:44+00:00): Hanjishart
Marc_ch (2025-12-02 12:13:59+00:00): Bonjour,
Merci pour ces améliorations et bienvenue.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13337998001
Malheureusement il y a un chiffre manquant dans le numéro de téléphone.
Pourriez-vous corriger cela ?
Sinon on peux supprimer le numéro de téléphone en attendant pour éviter que les utilisateurs essayent d’appeler un numéro invalide
Salutations,
Marc
Marc_ch (2025-12-02 12:14:48+00:00): oups je vous dis bienvenue alors que cela fait des années de présence :) j'ai été induis en erreur par l'éditeur qui disait "info:new_editor"
Flaburgan (2025-12-03 08:53:53+00:00): C'est corrigé, désolé.
eggie (2025-11-28 10:05:27+00:00): Lijkt me oke.
Ik heb De Hagenpoort samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode.
Naast religion =christian kun je denomination invullen.
bv evangelical  protestant roman_catholic

Andere religies hebben vaak ook hun eigen denomination.
.. en schuiven geeft risico op onbedoelde verplaatsingen. Met de pijltjestoetsen kan het dacht ik weer wel zonder schade.
Hier is het goed gegaan.
Je kunt ook zoiets in meer uploads doen en eerst uit de editmodus gaan en dan schuiven. 
Groet,
eggie
eggie (2025-11-28 10:06:13+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:denomination
Jaymap5432 (2025-11-28 10:25:39+00:00): Hoi eggie, dank je voor je review en suggesties. Ik vind het heel moeilijk om de denomination te bepalen voor scholen die vaak confessioneel zijn en katholicisme en protestantisme mengen of verder geen informatie erover hebben op hun website.
eggie (2025-11-28 10:31:34+00:00): Yep.. lastig.. we kennen natuurlijk ook oecumenisch
Maar als je het niet zeker weet gewoon weglaten.
Frans S (2025-12-21 17:06:41+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Welcome to the tasking manager and thanks for mapping buildings in this task. * Buildings should be mapped without snapping their corners to other buildings and features such as roads and paths.
In JOSM keep the ctrl key down while mapping the adjacent building. It will not connect nodes to each other.

Keep on mapping!
highflyer74 (2025-11-28 11:58:52+00:00): Hello and thanks for your work!

As a little review, just to let you know: Usually we do not move the nodes from one place to another, but rather change the data on those nodes. Due to the shift, on the CoLab node the address is still the old one and needs to be changed as well. It's always worth reviewing all the tags when a POI changes.

One thing that also needs to be taken into account is: what happenened to the old place? Is it vacant? And: the cafe that is mapped in the new location: does it still exist?

Maybe you can fill us in on that :-)

All the best!
mahoutsukai (2025-11-28 22:35:46+00:00): Hi, 

thanks for the heads-up! The next time I'll create a new node instead of moving a node around.

I don't understand the comment "on the CoLab node the address is still the old one". When I look at the node (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9417572505) I see the new address in the tags that I submitted with the changeset.

It's unclear what the owner of the house will do with the former rooms rented by CoLab. The contract ends at the end of the year, i.e. CoLab still pays for the old rooms in December, but it has already moved its business to the new location. The rooms at the old location are mostly empty.

You ask "And: the cafe that is mapped in the new location: does it still exist?". Do you mean Café Sunshine at the old location? Or the apartments at the new location? Café Sunshine will cease to exist at the end of the year. And the apartments are still there at the new location.
hoserab (2025-11-28 15:48:44+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:old_name#Date_ranges

"When only ranges of years are specified (no month or other details), a single hyphen may be used, such as `old_name:1953-1990 = Ernst-Thälmann-Straße`.

When full dates are specified or the simple notation is not sufficient, a double hyphen ('--') can separate the from and to date - e.g. `amenity:1965--1971-12-18 = school`."

:/
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-30 13:54:07+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13338041003/history - why you have selected amenity=office tagging?

"TourGPT" - is it some LLM-based tool?
JJIglesias (2025-11-28 14:02:13+00:00): Hi. is_in:xxx tag is being deprecated and arise a warning tag in Osmose, so we are changing to addr:xxx tag progressively, please DO NOT change them. Thanks
user_5359 (2025-11-28 17:30:11+00:00): By changing the address notation, you are only deceiving youselves. You can also ignore an error message; that is no reason to switch to another error, which I have criticized here. I cannot comply with the request, so I will continue to change the incomplete address data into what it really is: location assignments. But of course only if I discover them in other errors. I will not search for them specifically.
nevw (2025-11-29 03:05:54+00:00): Hi, you have changed the role of ways forming Trigona Nature Refuge from 'outer' to 'inner' and this is incorrect.
You have also added 'name=Capricorn Coast National Park Cocoanut Point' to the outer ways of Capricorn Coast National Park. 
I think it would be best the NP outerway need not be named in this way.
If you want to add 'Cocoanut Point' I think it would be better to add it as place=locality plus
name=Cocoanut Point
nevw (2025-11-30 01:02:13+00:00): I see you have added names to outer ways of a few individual areas of other NP sections. 
I now think that is a valid way to name explicit parts with the parks.
eggie (2025-11-28 10:15:29+00:00): Commentaar moet zijn poi verschoven
Kovoschiz (2025-11-28 12:14:48+00:00): Please don't create duplicates. Edit the existing ones.
NTTrailsLSE (2025-11-28 10:57:52+00:00): Thanks for fixing the spelling error!
PizzaTreeIsland (2025-11-28 11:00:31+00:00): No worries! It is quite a common mistake.
Sylabowy Kot (2025-11-28 10:59:41+00:00): Miałem problemy z połączeniem obydwu revertów. 

Planowane budynku oznaczamy prefixem planned/proposed, a nie wartością, która go renderuje. Po za tym linia metra M4 jest na razie zapowiedziana, a wszelkie informacje nt. M3 i M4 są zbyt kontrowersyjne i niepewne, by swawolnie dodawać ich obiekty jak leci.
eggie (2025-11-28 13:14:13+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
NeisBot (2025-12-13 21:49:04+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Security systems installation service in Elk Grove California"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-12-13 21:53:40+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/175266941
user_5359 (2025-12-09 11:02:36+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1454396609 (one of three objetcs). What is the mean of the tag tug= designated?