piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
supsup (2023-11-17 21:02:57+00:00): I meant this feature: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8527067

but now I see they use the tag "ref" and not "name" so I changed that.

The two lakes connected by that bridge definitely can be one body fo water, when I was there they were that, connected by that narrow strip of water. I think on the satelite it seems the connection is dry but I am not entirely sure.
felipeeugenio (2023-11-17 21:18:18+00:00): Hello Thomas
Thank you for your response. Please, for any tag, refer to the wiki, because the ref= tag is for a totally other thing (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ref).
Another mapper already noticed your editions, so he is going to evaluate and correct this.

regards
supsup (2023-11-17 22:01:52+00:00): Well, I was following the wiki, as I said earlier - that seems to be the recommended way to map the minimum and maximum level of a dam. But of course you can change the name of the tag.
jptolosa (2023-11-17 23:47:42+00:00): Hello Tomáš, thanks for your response. The usage of a second water polygon with intermittent=yes seems to be a practice only in some places, not a rule. In Chile generally we use one polygon matches with full level when a reservoir is usually filled during at least a moment in the year.

The case of "Lagunas de Teno" is different. The level that you saw is the same during all of the year and the same during more than a decade. Then the solution used by us is mapping the new level without intermittent polygon. Further, "Lagunas de Teno" is originally a natural lake with a dam building later to elevate its natural level. In these case the common practice is use water=lake instead water=reservoir, but is debatable. Some other lakes in the same situation are "Laguna del Maule" and "Laguna del Laja".

Regards.
supsup (2023-11-18 00:24:35+00:00): I see. In that case the larger body can be simply deleted, I guess (though I still find value in having both, but that is an outsider perspective).
aTarom (2023-11-15 16:21:34+00:00): ten en cuenta los name multivalue en valencia, por ejemplo:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/135416467/history
"name"="Carrer de Vicente Alexandre / Calle Vicente Aleixandre"
disculpa brevedad...
kapazao (2023-11-16 17:52:34+00:00): Ya lo he corregido, gracias por el aviso.
Parece que la sustitución que hice solo hace un cambio por línea y al haber 2 en este caso se saltaba 1. Lo tengo en cuenta para otra vez.
Un saludo
NorthCrab_upload (2023-11-15 10:20:26+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3146351784
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/380900474

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/367707459

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Dodko (2023-11-16 11:27:50+00:00): Pre obecný úrad je potrebné pridať značku amenity=townhall
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=townhall
Robert46798 (2023-11-16 21:55:34+00:00): Hallo Vati5641,

willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Vielen Dank für deine Aktualisierung!

Ich habe mir deinen Änderungssatz angeschaut, weil du die entsprechdne Option beim hochladen angegeben hast.

Das sieht so gut aus. Lediglich die Öffnungzeiten werden mit englischen und nicht deutschen Wochennamen angegeben. Auch bei der Zeichensetzung hat nicht alles gepasst. Aber das Schema ist auch nicht gerade einfach, um damit anzufangen.
Ich war so frei und habe es bereits entsprechend korrigiert.

Viele Grüße,
Robert
Robert46798 (2023-11-16 21:58:47+00:00): P.S.: Handelt es sich bei dem Laden tatsächlich um einen "richtigen" Supermarkt? Falls es eher eine kleine Einkaufsmöglichkeit ist, soetwas wie der Dorfladen, könnte eventuell das besser passen was im Editor als "Minimarkt" bezeichnet wird. Vielleicht kannst du das mit deinem lokalen Wissen noch überprüfen.
Yunkers (2023-11-18 14:18:48+00:00): A czym jest spowodowana ta degradacja? Jeszcze niedawno były proby podnoszenia  kategorii na Słowacji a teraz nasza część jest tertiary?
cyberatlas (2023-11-18 16:58:12+00:00): Droga słowacka jest drogą tertiary, stąd degradacja. Tagowanie nie musi się pokrywać z klasyfikacją urzędową.
Yunkers (2023-11-19 10:09:50+00:00): A może błąd jest po stronie słowackiej i tam należy poprawić? Kategorie na granicach zresztą nie muszą wcale się pokrywać.
rskedgell (2023-11-15 12:04:38+00:00): Hi, thanks for updating this.

addr:postcode was actually the correct tag for the postcode as part of an address, postal_code is generally used on streets (often as just the first half of the postcode).
rskedgell (2023-11-24 08:34:23+00:00): addr:* tags updated in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144397985
eggie (2023-11-15 11:48:42+00:00): Dag Andre...   Geeft svp commentaar bij je upload met wat je hebt aangepast.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-11-15 11:57:04+00:00): Het Het Rhedens Rozendaal stond 2x nu getagd op de kaart. Ik heb één vermelding verwijderd en de school weer omgezet naar amenity=school. Het is geen college. Dat zijn aoc's en roc's.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-11-15 11:46:43+00:00): review_requested

Lijkt me oke.. Conform de BAG nu. 
MVG
eggie
Jakka (2023-11-15 12:53:14+00:00): staat dit al vast dat dit een  	living_street is https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Road_signs_in_Belgium/F_Direction_and_information_signs#F12a
Jakka (2023-11-15 12:59:09+00:00): Deze weg ligt deze er al ?
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=811198107325070
trigpoint (2023-12-08 10:52:40+00:00): Is there a legal restriction here?
mcliquid (2023-11-15 12:21:28+00:00): Hi, die Beschilderung für einen gemeinsam genutzten Fahrstreifen gibt es in Österreich nicht (shared_lane). Was hat sich hier mittlerweile vor Ort geändert? Siehe auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:cycleway%3Dshared_lane
C Lo (2023-11-15 14:05:22+00:00): Hi, danke für die Info. War mir nicht bewusst, dass hier die Beschilderung gemeint ist, ich wollte nur die Info hinzufügen, dass es sich um einen ausgeschilderten Radweg handelt. Ich nehme es raus, bzw. ändere es.
tastrax (2023-11-15 22:39:12+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
pitfire (2023-11-15 12:57:34+00:00): @computerfarmer,
"footway"  Weg: 781674655 & Weg: 1223719945
hat jetzt eigene Bürgersteige "sidewalk"?
VG
gscholz (2023-11-16 08:42:09+00:00): Hi Frank314,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-69.92918&lat=12.43827&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=144048519

More directly it has destroyed the "Comandeurs Bay Key" islet:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/97566695#map=18/12.44210/-69.94273

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
aTarom (2023-11-15 14:49:28+00:00): Hi, thanks for editing, is the "route:class" key correct in the route relations? It's to be taken into account in future reviews.
Cheers
MacLondon (2023-11-15 23:58:13+00:00): Hi,
As the AMB cycle network will consist of what are officially called 'xarxa basica' (which will all be numbered routes in the future) + 'xarxa secundaria' (not numbered), I've started to use this 'route:class' tag as a way to distinguish between these 2 subtypes of rcn routes in the region.

I don't know of any official tag for doing this, so I used a customised tag (route:class).

Many maps of the cycle network only show the  'xerxa basica', including the maps along route sections that have already been numbered. It's useful to have a tag that can be used to create a customised map to render these 2 subtypes differently.

(I have also seen the terms 'primary' and 'secondary' in use for routes within London's cycle network.)
eggie (2023-11-15 12:33:39+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback   Alle begin is moeilijk. Het water heb ik nu verder aangepast mbv de BGT


MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Hufkratzer (2023-11-15 23:31:53+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1223759788 looks like a riding arena and not like a riding centre. Riding arenas should be tagged leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian (iD-preset "Horseback Riding / Rodeo Arena").

This is also the case for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/513969498 (jumping arena) and for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/136036265.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1223756381 looks like some paddocks perhaps, but not like a riding centre.

I don't know what https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1223763437 is, but for a riding centre it is too small. The tag leisure=horse_riding shall only be used for complete riding centres, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aleisure%3Dhorse_riding
Example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/533610195
arjunaraoc (2024-01-04 04:54:38+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).

Make your updates limited to a smaller area.

Happy mapping!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144048755
eggie (2023-11-15 12:38:40+00:00): request...  Yep .. klopt met de BAG
gr eggie
arjunaraoc (2024-01-04 04:54:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144049038
jcarlson (2023-12-05 15:11:26+00:00): what's the basis for changing the classification here?
1998alexkane (2023-12-05 17:12:01+00:00): It's a state highway serving as a connection between two relatively large settlements.
jcarlson (2023-12-05 17:21:22+00:00): being a state highway doesn't automatically upgrade classification. you can refer to IDOT's traffic count data, and you'll see that traffic on IL 31 across the river sees more than double the use on average (11k vs 4k). and douglas road, east of here, which is not a numbered route at all, actually sees more traffic than *either*. by sheer numbers, IL 25 is not the primary connection between these places, but i have also had discussions longtime area residents, and they confirm that. IL 25 is tertiary at best, at least up to Aurora
1998alexkane (2023-12-06 15:13:55+00:00): A state highway being tertiary is rather unusual at least, there's only a few examples in the whole state: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1Eois
In any case, it seems more major than other highway=tertiary, which are usually play a collector role. ILDOT classifies this portion of IL 25 as Minor arterial and IL 31 as a principle arterial.
jcarlson (2023-12-06 15:51:50+00:00): How does it seem more major? The way area residents and commuters use this road is pretty consistent with a collector road.

IDOT's classification scheme is a good starting point, but it does not map directly to OSM tags.

Your overpass link isn't working. But yes, it's true that there are not many tertiary state routes. I have to repeat, though, that being a state route does not *make* a road a higher classification. There's certainly some correlation there, but a road's classification should be considered apart from any numbered route it may participate in.

Highway classification is about a road's functional importance in the broader network, not its legal status, jurisdiction, or physical characteristics. This road, in this area, is simply not that important.
Meagan B (2023-12-06 19:20:14+00:00): I agree with user jcarlson. IL 25's classification should be tertiary as its functional importance is significantly less than nearby roads (IL 31 and Douglas Road). There's also discussion over on the IL Highway wiki regarding this area as well: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Illinois/Highway_Classification
eggie (2023-11-15 13:46:22+00:00): Weg losgekoppeld van wegdeel.
Erf laten aansluiten op landuse.
gr
eggie
eggie (2023-11-15 14:36:37+00:00): typo losgekoppeld van vlak
eggie (2023-11-15 13:43:38+00:00): Weg losgekoppeld van vlak. 
In principe geen vlakken aan wegen vastmaken.
Gr eggie
Tjuro (2023-11-15 12:40:15+00:00): Hallo Beeldman,

Ik zie dat je hier de landuse=* hebt geplakt aan de weg. Gelieve landuse niet over wegen te tekenen of landuse aan wegen te plakken. Dit levert namelijk problemen op als mensen later het willen aanpassen.

Met vriedelijke groet,

Tjuro
eggie (2023-11-15 13:41:24+00:00): Dit is oke, maar de landuse heb ik losgekoppeld van de weg.
MVG
eggie
mweper (2023-11-15 21:05:50+00:00): Hola. Con respecto a tus ediciones con la velocidad, has relevado in situ y con información actualizada que allí en ese sector de la ruta la máxima es de 80 km/h ??
Te lo pregunto porque, cuando yo he pasado en varias oportunidades, justo allí se encuentra un radar y carteles de aviso que permiten máxima de 60 km/h. Incluso tomando referencia como Mapillary ( https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=278797650589619 ).
Saludos.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-10 11:21:13+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1223771213/history has construction = construction that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What construction=construction means? What you wanted to express by using this tag?
cserpell (2023-11-15 22:44:29+00:00): Hola, por favor usar "Pasaje" y no "Pje."
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144049995
cserpell (2023-11-15 22:45:04+00:00): Una pregunta: todo el tramos tiene este nombre?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144049995
tastrax (2023-11-15 22:37:33+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
mikimapbuilder (2023-11-16 07:29:33+00:00): tastrax thank you so much for your comment and for pointing this out. Also thank you for correcting the phone format in this changeset. Happy mapping.
gscholz (2023-12-30 10:40:23+00:00): Hi Dæni,
I have reverted this changest, read here for more details:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144052415

Guido
goedegazelle (2023-11-15 12:49:30+00:00): Reden voor terugzetten:
De bewerking is onbesproken en leidt tot verlies van gegevens.
MattijsLeon73 (2023-11-26 17:18:21+00:00): Ik vind het prima dat je het weer terugzet, maar het was geen mechanical edit. Ik heb alles met de hand gecontroleerd voordat ik de aanpassing heb gedaan en het was vooral een verschil van inzicht. Maar zoals ik zei, ik vind het prima om het nu zo te laten.
Filip009 (2023-12-09 16:25:53+00:00): Ktoré youtube video je zdrojom?
cserpell (2023-11-15 23:03:37+00:00): Hola, por favor no agregar el prefijo "Calle".
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144050426
ChillyDL (2023-11-24 19:32:23+00:00): Hallo puma515,
jetzt muss ich doch mal nachfragen: In dem Fixme stand doch, dass der POI vor Ort als Hünengrab (nicht Hügelgrab) ausgewiesen sei. Stimmte das gar nicht? Denn sonst wäre ja doch archaeological_site=megalith mit megalith_type=chamber das richtige Tagging, nicht archaeological_site=tumulus.
puma515 (2023-11-24 21:06:40+00:00): Hallo ChillyDL. 
Da hast du Recht, habe ich beim mappen falsch gelesen das da Hünengrab und nicht Hügelgrab steht. 

am Wanderweg neben den Golfplatz steht nurnoch ein ausgeblichenes nicht mehr lesbares Schild.

Laut Wikipedia und webseite der Gemeinde Befinden sich im Gemeindegebiet Hünengräber. 

Daher habe die Tags nun entsprechend deinem vorschlag angepasst und dabei auch gleich noch den unterschied zwischen Hügelgrab und Hünengrab gelernt.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144421224
PLima785 (2023-11-15 15:21:28+00:00): Boas MRibz
bem vindo ao OSM,
uma coisa tenta, sempre que possível meter na linha de uma estrada se ela tem passeio ou se é segregada (tipo tem uma barreira como um muro) Ver
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sidewalk
e
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Guidelines_for_pedestrian_navigation

Boas edições
MRibz (2024-01-08 14:25:22+00:00): Viva PLima, 
Agradecido pela dica. Jugo que ficou resolvido com descritivo  "sidewalk". Com efeito trata-se de um caminho segregado (do trafego automóvel) por uns pilaretes semi-rigidos, desde a rotunda RT até à paragem bus de Rebordãos.
Muito obrigado, 
Cumprimentos, 
MRibz
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-13 04:13:10+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164878689
NorthCrab_upload (2023-11-15 13:30:40+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Podana kombinacja addr:city + addr:place jest nieprawidłowa.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2254627749
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2254641848
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2508485912
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6936868225
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6936868226
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7241755460
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7864291371
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/219339246
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/289299812

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Gonéo (2023-11-15 17:48:48+00:00): En 2021 il y avait bien un "bateau" en bas de la rue. Est-ce qu'il a été supprimé ou déplacé depuis ?
Gonéo (2023-11-15 18:09:28+00:00): L'aire est également présente en 2022.
PlayGuide (2023-11-16 21:27:17+00:00): Bonjour, je suis moi aussi surpris par ce groupe de modifications, est ce que l'aire de jeux en forme de bateau a vraiment (physiquement sur le terrain) été déplacée 300m plus haut dans la même rue ?!?
SNT - Diderot - MC (2023-11-16 21:45:44+00:00): Bonjour, j'en parle à mes élèves mercredi prochain pour vérifier avec eux.
Gonéo (2023-11-17 12:45:25+00:00): Je suis passé vérifier sur place. C'est surprenant mais je confirme que le bateau a mis les voiles pour remonter la rue. La contribution est donc  correcte.
PlayGuide (2023-11-17 17:48:55+00:00): 😅 C'est génial, j'adore cette histoire ! Merci Gonéo d'avoir vérifié sur place, et bravo aux élèves contributeurs !
Gonéo (2023-11-15 18:00:37+00:00): Bonjour, la contribution semble correcte. Elle pourrait cependant être améliorée en choisissant l'imagerie aérienne de 2022, prise en hiver sans le feuilles. Elle permet de mieux placer le tourniquet et la cabane, et peut-être d'ajouter une seconde cabane. Je vous laisse faire ?
Gonéo (2023-11-15 18:15:23+00:00): Bonjour,
Pour retrouver l'historique (et par respect pour les contributeurs qui ont créé le bâtiment) il est préférable de ne pas effacer pour remplacer, mais de modifier le bâtiment existant.
gscholz (2023-11-30 07:03:00+00:00): Hi  Dæni,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=4.62062&lat=46.51784&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=144052415

As you may know, this kind of errors irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps.

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2023-12-12 13:47:25+00:00): Hi Dæni, 
this error still exits, can I get your feedback here?
Guido
gscholz (2023-12-30 10:39:40+00:00): Hi Dæni, 
due to your missing response I have reverted this changeset to fix those issues.
Guido
Gonéo (2023-11-15 18:20:47+00:00): Très bien pour la voie de service. À l'occasion il en reste plusieurs à faire (parkings et vers le terrain de basket).

Pour le escalier, ceux qui sont visibles sur l'imagerie de 2022 ne longent pas le mur mais il font une courbe.
eggie (2023-11-16 11:55:22+00:00): https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=144052731

Nee ... dat geldt niet op de oprit.
Heb je contact gehad met de inframapper Jeroen van der Gun hierover?
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-11-16 12:07:55+00:00): reverted by changeset #144093588
habi (2023-11-21 17:10:55+00:00): Ciao Noah
Auch wenn https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/909564385 das Zuhause deiner Eltern ist, sollte es in den weltweit genutzten OpenStreetMap-Daten wohl doch nicht mit `name=Zuhause` erfasst werden.
Ich habe das in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144296433 korrgiert.
Gruss,
habi
BCNorwich (2023-11-16 08:47:49+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You made lots of duplications of features in this changeset, I think I've removed all of them. There were many duplicated highways that disrupted routing.

Please take heed of warnings when uploading. Also if a feature needs amending or correcting please amend/correct the existing feature, thus all history is kept.

Regards Bernard.
eggie (2023-11-16 11:53:43+00:00): Dag Rene... 
Je vraagt feedback. 
Het klinkt wonderlijk, maar op de opritten geldt die 120 of 100 niet.

Het was dus goed getagd. Er zijn vele draadje over geweest op het forum.
Je mag dus tot je op de A1  bent gewoon 130 rijden
Zie tagging Jeroen van de Gun.
Beter dus niet al die opritten gaan aanpassen.
Zie https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=144052731
Pas je het allemaal weer aan?
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-11-16 12:07:07+00:00): reverted by changeset #144093564
ReneKamp (2023-11-16 19:32:19+00:00): Dag Eggie,
Bedankt voor het melden.ik heb ondertussen de forums gelezen en zie dat ik niet de enige ben die dit verkeerd inschat. Echt logisch is het niet. Magic Earth geeft inderdaad 130 km aan, voor mij is dit  als Nederlander duidelijk maar voor een buitenlander lijkt me dit verwarrend. ik zal de wijzigingen terugzetten.
Mvgr,
René
eggie (2023-11-16 19:36:41+00:00): Top!..  
Yep.. de meningen waren verdeeld... vandaar dat ik begon.. 'Het klinkt wonderlijk....  maar goed.. het is nu de consensus waar de routers rekening mee kunnen houden.
Groet..
eggie
arjunaraoc (2024-01-04 04:48:45+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144053114
eggie (2023-11-16 11:56:40+00:00): Het is niet correct wat je doet.
Heb je dit overlegt met de voorgaande mappers.
Het was volgens mij allemaal goed getagd.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=144053221

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-11-16 12:06:12+00:00): reverted by changeset #144093528
eggie (2023-11-16 12:15:21+00:00): Je kunt het best even 'kortsluiten' met Jeroen van de Gun.
Ik heb voorlopig je edits even 'reverted' naar de tagging van voorgaande mappers.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/JeroenvanderGun

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-11-16 12:34:50+00:00): Hier een draadje over dit onderwerp
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/waarschuwing-plaatsen-op-opritten-van-autosnelwegen-vanwege-130-km-h/93165
eggie (2023-11-16 12:42:05+00:00): Rene...   Ik heb Jeroen even gevraagd om mee te kijken.
Als ik het verkeerd heb draai ik m'n reverts wel terug.
MVG
eggie
JeroenvanderGun (2023-11-16 13:27:58+00:00): De reverts zijn terecht, zie
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Reduced_speed_limit_on_Dutch_motorways
eggie (2023-11-16 13:31:30+00:00): Jeroen.. bedankt voor het meekijken.
Groet..
eggie