piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
FanTasMo (2024-09-24 05:50:53+00:00): Moin pyram,

bezüglich des alten Prellbocks:
An der Position, an der er jetzt steht, war in der BfB nie einer.
Der Prellbock wurde explizit als Reminiszenz an die ursprüngliche Nutzung dort platziert, daher finde ich im Gesamtkontext das Tagging "artwork" geeigneter als "historic".

Beste Grüße,
Stephan
pyram (2024-09-24 16:36:02+00:00): NaJa - wenn das Kunst ist, dann müsste es auch einen Künstler geben ( artist_name=* – Name des Künstlers/der Künstlerin ).

Zum Vergleich: Da stand auch nie eine Lok: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1486246321
oder ein Schiff:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6220363881

Im Kontext von OSM könnte man aber über https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:historic%3Dmemorial diskutieren und sich einen geeigneten Wert suchen: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/memorial#values

Besser?
OSM_RogerWilco (2024-09-21 20:27:22+00:00): und: access/traffic_sign Feldwege bei Oegenbostel
mcliquid (2024-10-04 14:17:31+00:00): This changeset was reverted fully because the address was already correct and complete (addr:place).

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157463419
mcliquid (2024-10-04 14:20:23+00:00): This changeset was reverted fully because the address was already correct and complete (addr:place).

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157463572
NorthCrab_upload (2024-09-21 19:31:01+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/806553271

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Syl (2024-09-22 07:46:09+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai enlevé l'info que les distributeurs acceptent les euros, il n'y a pas besoin de le préciser quand c'est la monnaie nationale.
Toto2642 (2024-09-22 08:00:51+00:00): Hello ! Ah ok tu as bien fait ! Merci bien !
eggie (2024-09-21 20:51:19+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-09-21 21:09:56+00:00): Officetag ontbreekt.
eggie (2024-09-21 21:08:38+00:00): Hoi,

Dit doet niets in OSM
NX Filtration BV

Er ontbreekt een bedrijfstag. Bv office=company
Gr eggie
notmyproblem1 (2025-06-18 09:29:19+00:00): Ciao! Hai controllato se i ristoranti (e i bagni) esistono realmente? nelle immagini aeree più recenti non ci sono, solo su Esri ci sono.

Grazie
os-emmer (2024-09-21 19:52:31+00:00): Siehe hierzu auch Diskussion https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155813170
eggie (2024-09-21 20:58:35+00:00): Dit schuiven net de kaart in editmodus geeft schade door onbedoelde verschuivingen.
Helaas hier ook.
Niet schuiven met de kaart svp.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-09-21 21:02:24+00:00): reverted by changeset Wijzigingenset #156928557

De school stond toch gewoon op de kaart?  Svp eerst kijken voordat je wat toevoegt.
Schade weer hersteld. 
MVG
eggie
OSM-NL (2024-09-21 21:04:25+00:00): Ah dank je. Zag net wat je bedoelde. Zal hier op gaan letten.
eggie (2024-09-21 21:06:12+00:00): Prima... Laat je niet uit het veld slaan door opmerkingen van mij.

Mapse
eggie
validator
eggie (2024-09-21 21:07:20+00:00): Hier zie je wat er gebeurde
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=156926651
Jrachi (2024-09-22 06:36:57+00:00): Ciao.
La tua osservazione sul tracciato del 780 è basata su esperienze nel territorio? Cioè la segnaletica non corrisponde alla relazione?
La relazione l'avevo inserita io sulla base dei dati regionali. Essendo un rilievo del 2014 e fatto da un progettista potrebbe essere da aggiornare.
In base alla tua risposta provvedo a segnalare alla SOSEC per un eventuale aggiornamento.
Ivo
Davide Brolit (2024-09-22 07:11:32+00:00): Ciao! L'osservazione è più che altro basata sulla carta escursionistica Valsesia sud-est (Geo4Map) e sul sito CAI di Varallo; onestamente  non ricordo cosa sia indicato in loco, ci ho fatto caso solo ieri sera mentre aggiornavo la mappa. Se possono essere utili, ti linko le descrizioni dei sentieri in questione:
780: http://www.caivarallo.it/valsesia/sentieri-valsesia/sentieri-valsesia-dettaglio.php?sentiero=571
779: http://www.caivarallo.it/valsesia/sentieri-valsesia/sentieri-valsesia-dettaglio.php?sentiero=568
Magiaiga: http://www.caivarallo.it/valsesia/sentieri-valsesia/sentieri-valsesia-dettaglio.php?sentiero=583
Grazie
Davide
Jrachi (2024-09-22 07:52:21+00:00): Le carte escursionistiche, di per se, non sono fonti da prendere in considerazione per richiedere una revisione del percorso a catasto.
Posso intervenire solo se la segnaletica locale differisce dal tracciato a catasto.
Ivo
Davide Brolit (2024-09-22 08:09:44+00:00): Ok! Oltre alla segnaletica (non credo che sul tratto del Magiaiga sia indicato un segnavia), si possono considerare anche i pannelli informativi sul posto?
Jrachi (2024-09-22 08:16:38+00:00): Dipende dalla fonte che ha ispirato i pannelli.
Se si basano sulle carte, come ho già detto, non si possono usare anche perché non è sempre possibile capire con certezza se sono utili, per via della risoluzione delle mappe
Davide Brolit (2024-09-30 16:47:08+00:00): Ciao! Ho fatto un sopralluogo in zona, ti aggiorno:
Il sentiero che parte dal fondovalle è segnalato dal CAI come "Sentiero del rio Magiaiga", fino all'incrocio poco prima delle grotte (c'è un cartello all'inizio e uno alla fine, gli altri sono solo segnali biancorossi).
Davanti alle grotte un cartello indica che il tratto è in comune ai sentieri 779 e 781.
Non ho fatto la controprova percorrendo il 780, ma a questo punto non ci sono dubbi che parta da Ara. Ho fatto un paio di foto ai segnavia, ma al di là del dimostrare l'esistenza del sentiero "Rio Magiaiga" non credo possano servire a tanto...
eggie (2024-09-21 20:56:37+00:00): Een gebouw naam hoort op de gebouwomtrek.. Een bedrijfsnaam op een node. Dit doet niets in OSM.
Kijk je nog even?
gr eggie
eggie (2024-09-21 21:14:52+00:00): Wellicht kun je gewoon wat verwijderen?
eggie (2024-09-21 21:16:54+00:00): Kijk anders  even hier https://viewer.satellietdataportaal.nl/@52.50484,6.077588,19/?datastrip=20240901_SVNEO-01
In editor JOSM heb je ook recentere luchtfoto's.
eggie (2024-09-21 21:26:11+00:00): Even wat aangepast naar de werkelijkheid
eggie (2024-09-21 20:54:03+00:00): Dit is niet correct

bridge:name	=Hoge Spoorbrug staat al in de tagging en de naam staat al op het vlak.
Ik pas het weer aan. 
MVG
eggie
Marek-M (2024-12-12 09:23:51+00:00): Cześć, jeżeli Twoim zamiarem było oddanie geograficzne koryta rzeki, to tutaj zrobiłeś to nieprawidłowo.

Zapoznaj się proszę z artykułem https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:water%3Driver

Aby odwzorować prawidłowo rzekę tworzy się pojedynczą linię `waterway=river` stanowiącą drogę wodną - po tej linii później niektóre nawigacje potrafią tworzyć trasy. Zasięg koryta rzeki tworzy się z obszarów obejmujących tą linię otagowanych jako:
```
natural=water
water=river
```
Marek-M (2024-12-12 09:30:46+00:00): Poprawiłem koryto rzeki w tym CS: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160199456
user_177389 (2024-09-22 06:56:20+00:00): Hello Editor2001,

this is not an administrative boundary as defined in OSM. boundary=ceremonial seems appropriate though. I have adjusted the tags accordingly.

Best regards,
Mario
Colin Smale (2024-09-22 07:22:28+00:00): I disagree with Mario here. A CA is an admin boundary in OSM. All the other CAs have been admin_level=5 for a long time.
eggie (2024-09-21 20:52:53+00:00): OSM   Dit doet alleen niets in OSM.

MVG
eggie
ObscureAngel (2024-10-09 09:15:11+00:00): Hello and thank you for your contribution !

Please note for the future: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to :
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping ! :-)
eteb3 (2024-09-23 22:06:46+00:00): Is addr:city reserved for the RM post town, then? I seem to remember a long discussion in the Talk-GB list saying otherwise. 

In any case, Castor as “suburb” of Peterborough seems not quite right to me: it looks, feels, and considered itself to be be separate village - and it’s a “parished area” administratively
⇄ john paul jones & gringo (2024-09-24 07:50:31+00:00): Hello,  I am not aware of talk-GB is this in the OSM forum? - however the address system in OSM seems to take the postal type address system, with number, street, city, post code. Suburb is not perfect I agree, but with what is available it seems the best option. There is an entry available for place or village but this does not show up on the main dialogue.  Therefore I have been correcting the addresses along the lines of the standard postal addresses. As seen here: 
https://osm.mathmos.net/addresses/post-towns/PE.html 
the postal district PE5 does not have a post office located within it, I believe this is the reason for the error (red) showing.  If you pick out another area such as Chelmsford you’ll see the colour variations that indicate errors  https://osm.mathmos.net/addresses/post-towns/CM.html 
I hope this explains your query
eteb3 (2024-09-24 09:34:54+00:00): Thanks for the explanation. Yes, talk-gb is an email list - see here for some discussions on this topic:
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=site%3Ahttps%3A%2F%2Flists.openstreetmap.org%2Fpipermail%2Ftalk-gb%2F+%22post+town%22&t=osx

(More heat than light in some cases!)

Happy to accept that addr:city is for the post town. 

Checking Rob's pages here
https://osm.mathmos.net/addresses/addr-tags.html
it seems plenty of UK addresses (in OSM) also make use of addr:village. That might be better in these cases than suburb? Refreshing my memory with a quick scan of the discussions above, the village will never (or only very rarely) form part of the 'official' Royal Mail address - so it's a physical, ground-truth element, rather than referring to the RM gazetteer (which I think gets called PAF?), so I'd argue that  calling it a village rather than a suburb has informational value.
eteb3 (2024-09-24 09:45:37+00:00): I see this very question has been hashed over on the listserv. Here's Rob vindicating my position ;-)

https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2022-January/028432.html
⇄ john paul jones & gringo (2024-10-02 19:14:06+00:00): Yes, I was simply following on what had been done before (suburb) It's not always an actual suburb very often a village or even town. 
I see no problem with using addr:village
as you say, or both as I have seen used.
eggie (2024-09-21 21:57:18+00:00): Hi joergorgnoh

Please use the BAG addressnode to tag o.
I merged your info.
Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2024-09-21 21:34:29+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-09-21 21:39:44+00:00): Dag JR
Op de website heet de kerk
De Vermaning ‘t Lam ?

MVG
eggie
JR_Nl (2024-09-23 16:52:37+00:00): Dag eggie, 

Dank voor je welkomstbericht.

Op de website wordt de kerk zowel 't Lam als Het Lam genoemd en zowel de term vermaning als doopsgezinde vermaning wordt gebruikt, alhoewel dit laatste eigenlijk een pleonasme is. Boven de deur van de kerk zelf staat 't Lam en er hangt een bordje met de tekst 'Doopsgezinde Vermaning'.
Er zijn dus meerdere combinaties mogelijk en dit zijn volgens mij allemaal geldige namen van dit gebouw.

JR
eggie (2024-09-23 17:10:22+00:00): Oke. Up to you.
Het viel me gewoon op.

Mvg..
eggie
eggie (2024-09-21 21:05:24+00:00): Top!
eggie (2024-09-21 21:52:49+00:00): Dag bigi  Op grond van Esri is het ondoenlijk om gebouwen uit te lijnen. Ik heb het nu even met de BGT Omtrekgericht gedaan.
Je kunt ook om herïmport vragen via het forum.

MVG
eggie
CRCulver (2025-05-04 23:05:42+00:00): What is the source for bikes not being permitted on Islom Karimov ko'cashi pedestrian street in Samarkand? I surveyed Samarkand for several weeks last year and frequently saw bikes on this road.
x a (2025-05-05 09:35:36+00:00): I was there twice half a year ago. There are signs posted at the northern end of Islom Karimov mo'chasi and near Kamaliddin Behzad Park that forbid riding bikes through this pedestrian area. But you are certainly right: Many bike riders don't care and ride along anyways.
Udarian (2024-09-21 21:17:01+00:00): * and Southwest 84th Avenue
rskedgell (2024-09-22 07:13:20+00:00): The signage here is a little inconsistent, but that looks OK to me.

Assuming the available imagery is still current:

1) Entering from Boundary Lane: no entry sign with "except buses and cycles" on the left and "no through route except for buses and cycles on the right".  A no entry sign should be interpreted as vehicle=no, with bus=designated + bicycle=designated exceptions. "No through route" would usually mean access=destination, but that doesn't really make sense with a no entry sign and the plate on the right isn't an authorised variant. Bing street side imagery of uncertain date.
https://www.bing.com/maps/?toWww=1&redig=5D8227B414074D5485818F590B616E23&cp=51.52195%7E0.039991&lvl=19.1&mo=om.1&pi=-19&style=x&dir=219.5

2) Exiting toward Boundary Lane: bus and cycle only blue sign, with a separate white "no through route except for buses and cycles" sign before it. I think the white sign can be ignored for practical purposes, so it should probably be access=no + bus=designated + bicycle=designated here. If there weren't' separately mapped sidewalks here, foot=yes might be needed. Mapillary imagery from Jan 2024.
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=390804306768746
rskedgell (2024-09-22 07:28:25+00:00): Looking at the traffic orders in The Gazette, there's an exemption for "maintenance, refuse and other essential vehicles", so it should probably be:
1) vehicle=private + bus=designated + bicycle=designated
2) access=private + bus=designated + bicycle=designated

I suspect the "no through route" signs are intended to stop council vehicles using the road as a short cut, rather than being directed at the general public.

https://www.thegazette.co.uk/notice/2769434
jpennycook (2024-09-22 13:48:07+00:00): The section of Glen Road that this lift gate is part of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/663336747 just has access=no without any exemption for buses etc. - should it also be adjusted to have similar access tags to the lift gate, consistent with the eastbound section https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/32612693 ?
rskedgell (2024-09-22 14:20:59+00:00): @jpennycook thanks for spotting that! I've updated the access tags and added the signage in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156953892
Niederpruem (2024-09-21 22:06:07+00:00): Wechsel mal die Bildmaterial-Quelle bei OpenStreetMap zu "Bing Maps Luftbild" oder zu "Esri Weltbilder (Klarheit) Beta".
Dort kann man auch sehr schön den fertigen Parkplatz ohne Gebäude sehen.
Bienson (2024-10-22 05:05:05+00:00): Das sind veraltete Luftaufnahmen. Die Gebäude sind neu.
Niederpruem (2024-10-23 23:58:48+00:00): ok, wahrscheinlich bist Du persönlich da gewesen. Dann ist ja alles gut.
sorbovit (2024-09-22 07:54:00+00:00): Perhaps, I haven't been there for many years.
marc__marc (2024-09-22 12:52:56+00:00): Thanks forr your feedback
Zkir (2024-09-23 13:00:31+00:00): Добрый день!

Можете посмотреть сколько в доме Кушелевой на самом деле этажей?
Там части здания на друг на друга как-то очень странно накладываются?

1) https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/113471364

2) https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/99634188
mini-me (2024-09-23 18:15:13+00:00): Здравствуйте! Интересное, конечно, здание... Думаю все building:part'ы можно смело удалить - они не соответствуют действительности. Я немного подправлю геометрию, но тут надо звать @vonrockos или ещё какого эксперта по 3D :)
Zkir (2024-09-23 21:29:22+00:00): @mini-me, спасибо!

Не хочется самому править здание, которое я видел только на картинках))
InsertUser (2024-09-22 14:44:53+00:00): These are all look like they're waterway=tidal_channel rather than streams.
skorasaurus (2024-09-24 15:23:53+00:00): thank you very much for the notice; that definitely seems like the more appropriate tag; I'll use this tag in the future and go back to fix these as well.
ianlopez1115 (2024-09-23 16:09:37+00:00): Just because a road is part of private property doesn't mean that it can be removed from the map, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Limitations_on_mapping_private_information for details
Yohan Plum (2024-09-23 20:44:03+00:00): I removed it because i’s not a road. There's no road inside that property and juts pathways. By definition they are different.
Yohan Plum (2024-09-23 20:51:04+00:00): I changed it from road to pathway.
Bobropiton (2024-09-22 09:02:58+00:00): Благодарю
ratrun (2024-09-22 05:51:58+00:00): Thank you!
I tried to figure out how this could have happened, but I don't have any idea. And this happened too long ago, such that I do not remember. 
May I ask what tool you are using such that you spotted this mistake?
marc__marc (2024-09-22 13:21:42+00:00): Osmose.openstreetmap.fr warn for orphan node groups.
I loaded them into josm with overpass and found that it made a linear feature.
using overpass I looked at the state of osm at the time these nodes were created, I found that there was a way deleted :)
marc_marc_repair (2024-09-22 21:28:26+00:00): https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/issues/open?item=1080&level=1%2C2%2C3
https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/#item=1080&level=1%2C2%2C3
NorthCrab_upload (2024-09-21 23:50:47+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2602385696
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/232210522

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2024-09-22 00:04:28+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2779641762
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2779641761
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2779671884
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2779610064
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2779610061
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2779605808
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2779659872
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2779621687
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2779681630
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2779681626
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2779681623
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2779681619
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2779683567
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2779681991
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2779681441
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2779681442
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/139614840
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/183198640
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/146404571
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/146404576
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/167875802
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/184962432
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/188194388
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/189878064
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/189878071
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/189878078
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/189878082
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/189878105

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
kubzon7 (2024-09-22 15:20:49+00:00): poprawione: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156956543
aTarom (2024-09-22 06:47:07+00:00): Hola, gracias por editar, una consulta por favor, el tag
border=barrier
en
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1316254002/history
parece que se usaba hace años según la cronología en TAGinfo
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/border#chronology
puedes confirmarme de si se trata de un error? desconozco su uso por completo.
Gracias y feliz mapeo!
jleedev (2024-09-22 00:51:11+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
ferog_v (2024-09-22 21:03:48+00:00): Buen día Ferrocarriles de México, le explico el motivo de mi cambio y un debate sobre ello podría ayudarnos a llegar a una solución adecuada.
En formatos oficiales como lo son el siguiente archivo:
https://www.sct.gob.mx/fileadmin/DireccionesGrales/DGST/Datos_Viales_2024/31_YUC_DV2024.pdf
Se identifican las "Rutas" como MEX-000 o YUC o YUC-000

Es el mismo caso en los detalles de los "Puntos generadores" (de información de tránsito) de las mismas carreteras en los datos viales que proporciona el estudio federal de las carreteras
http://datosviales2020.routedev.mx/main#
La wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Mexico/Red_Nacional_de_Caminos dice que para la referencia se usen los datos que dé la SCT.

Usted menciona en mi conjunto de cambios muchos países utilizan el prefijo espacio y luego el número. (ex. MEX 000)
Hay varios que lo hacen incluso sin espacio directamente (ex. MEX000)

Así mismo hay muchos que lo hacen con guion. (ex. MEX-000)
Como es el caso de 
Centroamérica (Guatemala, El Salvador y Honduras):
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/388782364
Perú:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/363845753
España:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/121855160

Sería fructífero que analizásemos estas relaciones para poder mapearlas de forma correcta, siguiendo las normas que se han establecido.
jeremy77 (2024-10-14 20:06:26+00:00): This does exist, it's paved and presumably will eventually connect to Carroll st.
InfiNorth (2024-10-14 20:30:24+00:00): You are correct thank you for the correction.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-09-23 21:23:05+00:00): This changeset created duplicate highways
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156933328
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-09-23 21:39:00+00:00): This changeset reuploaded changes made in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156933328
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156933341
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-09-23 21:39:31+00:00): reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157014604
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-03 02:17:08+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/638176421/history

is it deliberate that you deleted amenity=fast_food without replacement?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-06-02 22:47:54+00:00): reverted as accidental mistake

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167111665
StephanHK (2024-09-22 06:35:52+00:00): Wrong peak, change can be deleted. Sorry for the confusion.
Enock4seth (2025-12-06 10:54:00+00:00): Hi BigKev97, where did this mass addition of street names came from? Looks non-free and copyrighted source. Can you please clarify.
BigKev97 (2025-12-26 19:51:17+00:00): Names founded in the street signs.
Stevestephen (2024-09-22 02:27:07+00:00): Based on Local Knowledge, not Aerial Imagery
tyfi (2024-09-22 04:02:18+00:00): Also referenced this page for the address: https://arnoldchamber.org/events/details/ribbon-cutting-compass-health-dental-3472
tyfi (2024-09-22 04:03:03+00:00): Name of Compass Health location is "Compass Health Dental" according to chamber of commerce. The sign on the front says just "Compass Health".
goedegazelle (2024-09-23 20:43:59+00:00): Er ligt ook geen boot.
Глеб (2024-12-02 07:29:12+00:00): thanks