piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Adamant1 (2023-05-20 00:48:44+00:00): "if the OpenStreetMap wiki isn't "authoritative," what is?" How about local mappers want the object to be tagged and or in conjection with the on the ground rule maybe? Honestly I can understand where your coming from. The Wiki should be at least a semi-authorative source of how to tag things, but them every time I cite the thing or an edit an article I get attacked for trying to push my way of doing things on other people. Same goes for mapping in areas where I don't live to BTW. It uaually results in concern trolls who don't live in the area either coming along and causing drama about"local mappers" and the on the ground rule. So at least the ship of the Wiki being any kind of authority sunk a long time ago. 

What we need is some core tags for the most important types of objects that are curated and enforced by the WMF. Until then though, the Wiki is only as you can throw it. Articles are good way for new mappers to see what tags are out there and how to use them locally, but what they say isn't a valid excuse to overide the preferences of locals who actually been to the places your mapping. In this case I'm willing to say neither one of the tags we want to use are 100% accurate, but at least landise=recreation_ground fits better with my experiences as a local of riding my mountain bike around the area for years. It's kind of a side thing, but BLM land isn't really mapped around here (or really anywhere that I'm aware of) anyway and if I had my way this wouldn't be mapped in the first place since it doesn't really have an exact area to begin with (the current boundary is pretty inaccurate), but if it has to be mapped then landuse=recreation_ground is better then tagging it as a nature reserve.
tyfi (2023-04-29 20:20:38+00:00): I followed this up with a changeset to add access restrictions.
jonrellim (2023-04-29 20:33:40+00:00): Hi,
You requested a review. Seems all good. 
You even left the address data behind correctly, thanks.

jonrellim
Frans S (2023-04-30 09:56:45+00:00): Checked mappings task 2874
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135517219
bxl-forever (2023-04-30 20:42:49+00:00): Hello,

I am puzzled by your change about the following footway:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/408941466/history

In version 1, a user wrote "steep=yes", which is an unknown key.
You made it "step=yes", which makes no sense either.

I don’t know this footway but I suspect the original author meant that it is very steep, i.e. probably a key like "incline" was intended.

What was the purpose of your edit, please (apart from getting rid of Osmose flags for the sake of it)?  How can we help?
ivanbranco (2023-04-30 07:19:51+00:00): Ciao Francesco,

per favore modifica gli edifici già esistenti, invece di cancellarli e ridisegnarli, perché così si perde lo storico dell'elemento: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history

Qua per esempio ha cancellato un ingresso che non hai rimappato: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3412385618/history

qua hai cancellato un poliambulatorio, non esiste piu? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/383742767/history
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-10-31 18:33:41+00:00): Geometrie dodane w tej edycji ( http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=135518484 ) nie były poprawnym mapowaniem pól. Proszę, nie rób takich edycji.
radiotrefoil (2024-12-09 12:10:49+00:00): Hi, this appears to have misplaced the positions of a number of benches. For example the bench at Gordon Falls lookout (node/9376264218) is now 75 metres from the correct location.
radiotrefoil (2024-12-10 03:10:59+00:00): fixed in changeset/160113482
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-09 10:49:30+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10856676923/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-19 05:52:39+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10856694502/history has fixme = yes that was added in this edit
What requires fixing here? fixme=yes is not particularly clear, and maybe problem got fixed since then?
watmildon (2023-05-01 23:26:43+00:00): Hello! Is the restroom actually in the middle of parking lot? Totally possible just a little surprising!

Welcome to OSM. Thanks for contributing.
MercedesPix (2023-05-01 23:43:15+00:00): Hello! Yes the restroom is a public access room in the middle of the parking lot. I have a pics and I am familiar with the area.
watmildon (2023-05-02 03:57:48+00:00): That's great. A perfect edit as that's totally non-obvious to those of us mapping from afar.
Frans S (2023-04-30 09:56:08+00:00): checked mappings task 2875
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135519487
Frans S (2023-04-30 09:55:31+00:00): checked mappings
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135519562
Svalbard (2023-05-01 05:30:27+00:00): Hello Yunan631029, you are creating "hot_springs" [1] all over the world. Are these really "hot_springs"? I cannot believe that one will find a "hot_spring" in a military area in Denmark, the coast near Spitsbergen, a highway or an airport. Where does the data come from?
Greetings Svalbard

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dhot_spring
Frans S (2023-04-30 09:54:40+00:00): Checked mappings
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135520486
Molandfreak (2023-04-29 23:45:39+00:00): Could someone revert this edit?
Frans S (2023-04-30 09:36:41+00:00): checked on issues
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135520720
Frans S (2023-04-30 09:53:39+00:00): Checked mappings.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135520720
user_18305684 (2023-05-04 17:45:00+00:00): Hi,

why did you had the tag multipolygon on the way ? The tag is only for multipolygon relations.

I fixed it.

Best regards
Gonéo (2023-11-06 21:49:18+00:00): Bonjour,

Tu as passé la rue https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1077465860 en oneway mais il reste des lanes:forward/backward. J'imagine que c'est un oubli. Si tu sais combien il y a de voies maintenant, je te laisse ajouter. Sinon on supprime le nombre de voies et StreetComplete posera à nouveau la question aux gens qui passent là-bas.
Gonéo (2023-11-06 21:50:05+00:00): Idem pour ce segment https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1077483024#map=19/45.75618/4.89111
Robert Whittaker (2023-08-24 22:13:43+00:00): In this changeset, you added a Defibrillator at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10857037358 . However, there was already one mapped a few metres away at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4681850123 . Do you know if there are genuinely two AEDs this close together here, or should there just be one?
RaccoonFederation (2023-08-25 08:22:21+00:00): I would assume only one. The old node is partially covered by a bench so probably didn't see it. It looks like my location is more accurate from photos of the lifeboat station online.
Frans S (2023-04-30 09:33:27+00:00): Checked for issues.
Udarian (2023-04-30 00:06:17+00:00): last word got cut off, it was "large"
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-05-21 20:22:03+00:00): porque existem duas escolas com mesmo nome aqui?
FraukeLeo (2023-07-18 18:06:34+00:00): Hallo Buddor, du musst nicht per Abbiegebeschränkung das Abbiegen gegen eine Einbahnstraße verbieten. Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Relation:restriction#Wichtig_zu_beachten Punkt 2.
Frans S (2023-04-30 08:52:20+00:00): Checked. corrected issues
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135521182
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-05-21 20:22:45+00:00): por favor coloque o numero da delegacia
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-05-21 20:22:55+00:00): favor colocar o nome da igreja
user_18305684 (2023-04-30 23:43:25+00:00): Hi,

Be careful when you want to improve multipolygons : tags should be on the relation, not on the outer or inner ways, see "Example of tagging for actual features" here = https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon#One_outer_and_one_inner_ring

I fixed the 3 wrong multipolygons : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135556021

Best regards
CurlingMan13 (2023-06-11 09:55:37+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please do NOT delete roadways just because they are private or have restricted access.  Access tags should be utilized instead.

Private roads and driveways are super helpful for delivery services (Uber, Amazon, UPS, etc.), as well as for emergency services (fire, police, EMS, etc.).

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137197857
CurlingMan13 (2023-06-11 09:53:53+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please do NOT delete roadways just because they are private or have restricted access.  Access tags should be utilized instead.

Private roads and driveways are super helpful for delivery services (Uber, Amazon, UPS, etc.), as well as for emergency services (fire, police, EMS, etc.).

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137197792
CurlingMan13 (2023-06-11 09:53:54+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please do NOT delete roadways just because they are private or have restricted access.  Access tags should be utilized instead.

Private roads and driveways are super helpful for delivery services (Uber, Amazon, UPS, etc.), as well as for emergency services (fire, police, EMS, etc.).

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137197792
CurlingMan13 (2023-04-30 20:42:45+00:00): Can you elaborate on what you did, rather than requesting someone to review your edit?
mueschel (2023-05-01 16:51:57+00:00): Hallo,
was heißt denn "schema=old" an Busrelationen?
user_5359 (2023-04-30 04:44:02+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please note that you write the value of opening_hours in the order weekday open time; weekday open time. With the order you have chosen, weekday, weekday open time, open time, a clear assignment is difficult, not only for the human being. If you need help to correct this: You are welcome.
LockOnGuy (2023-04-30 16:10:00+00:00): Amazing work! Thank you!
user_12523467 (2023-05-01 00:32:12+00:00): thanks
Aim311_ (2023-05-01 11:19:23+00:00): Hey! It seems to me that the tag building=storage_tank describes the facility well. 
You can see from the picture (https://www.google.com/maps/@52.5144235,16.2571003,3a,50y,355.53h,96.48t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sPIsUgJXi1xaL5rwv3mMeQQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) that it is a building - it has solid foundations, walls and a specific roof. If there is a conflict with man_made then the man_made tag should be removed, not building.
I would add roof shape roof:shape=cone to the existing building.

The definition on the wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dstorage_tank indicates that you should be careful in removing tags, because not every tank is a building. In this case it is a building and a silo at the same time.
Regards.
watmildon (2023-05-01 17:28:19+00:00): This is pretty clearly a grain silo and not a storage tank. If there's a conflict in tagging, the accurate tags should be kept and the conflicting tags removed or updated. Almost all silos near me lack a building tag but I have put the building tag back as building=silo. As you point out, our tagging scheme has lots of other sub-tags off "building:".

As a reminder using Google for mapping is not allowed. Bing StreetSide or Mapillary are similar services that have licenseing allowable for use in OSM mapping.
os-emmer (2024-03-21 16:29:22+00:00): Hello Warin61,
you added a building that is overlapping with another building. Can you maybe have a look and help fixing that? Thanks.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4162192
Warin61 (2024-03-23 07:58:12+00:00): Thanks.. how did I miss that?
os-emmer (2024-03-23 14:49:59+00:00): Thanks for the fix. Stuff like this happens, so don't worry :)
kwiatek_123 (2023-05-03 21:23:17+00:00): Zerknij proszę
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3669711
mariotomo (2023-05-01 07:12:40+00:00): añadiste unos cerros, con sus nombres.
cuál es la fuente? ls que declaras, "maxar", no me parece posible.
gpserror (2023-05-01 05:19:16+00:00): I'm not sure who okayed test edits, but people shouldn't be doing test ("knowingly false data") or learning edits on active data.  Please remove any experimental data as soon as possible.
mariotomo (2023-05-01 07:00:27+00:00): hola. cuál es la fuente del nombre de la quebrada Tubonte?  gracias.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-02 10:43:27+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10857395576/history has fixme:type = Church that was added in this edit
Is it a a Christian place of worship? (amenity=place_of_worship religion=christian - see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dplace_of_worship)
Is it a religious office?
Something else?
CurlingMan13 (2023-11-01 12:26:15+00:00): Please use more detailed changeset comments.  What did you change, and why?
eggie (2023-04-30 06:33:02+00:00): 

Dag G   
Ahhhhh... JOSM !
Alleen knooppunt 57 heb ik nog in de juiste volgorde 'moeten' leggen.
Niet echt een 'ramp'. 
Misschien lag dat al verkeerd.

MVG
eggie
vasony (2023-05-17 18:40:36+00:00): Szia!

A szabályozási terv nem a legjobb forrása az utcaneveknek, ez alapján felmérés nélkül légy szíves ne javítsd át az utcaneveket.
Számtalanszor előfordul, hogy nem egyezik a táblázott vagy hivatalos utcanévvel.

ld:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/20029839#map=14/47.5460/21.6222

Tamás
nslxndr (2023-05-17 19:58:55+00:00): Szia!

Rendben, köszi az infót.

A módosítást jó eséllyel az triggerelte, hogy a name címke értéke nem egyezett az utcán lévő objektumok által az addr:street címkében hivatkozott értékkel. Aztán amennyire emlékszem, az utca neve lóghatott ki a sorból, az utcán lévő objektumok címükként is körútként közölték a csatornáikon (persze ez még önmagában nem jó forrás, csak megerősítés), így okafogyottnak láttam megnézni, mert azon túl, hogy én is körútként ismertem, gyakran láttam felmerülni a szabályozási terveket mint a térképezés alapját, és ott ellenőrizve az egységesítés során azt tekintettem magasabb prioritással irányadónak (2023.03.10. dátumtól megjelölt hatályossága miatt is) a többi forrással összecsengve, függetlenül attól, hogy a táblákkal vajon hányadán állnak, ha egyáltalán azokat sikerült kitenniük, egységesíteniük.

Ugyan nem ezen múlott, de esetleg a wikiben a Jelölési példáknál az utcanévhez javaslom ezt az információt bejegyezni megadva az esélyt, hogy ha valaki olvassa, épüljön a szerkesztői köztudatba, hogy csak a kihelyezett tábla az irányadó akár ellentmondó szabályozási terv esetén is (bár kicsit szőrszálhasogatva, akkor ha nincs tábla, és csak az lehet az elnevezés alapja, akkor annak hiánya az utca névtelenítését vonja maga után :), vagy csak hogy a szabályozási tervet abszolút ne vegyük figyelembe e tekintetben.
vasony (2023-05-17 21:15:06+00:00): Bővítettem a jelölési példákat
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hungary/Jel%C3%B6l%C3%A9si_p%C3%A9ld%C3%A1k#Utcanevek

illetve az addr:street szekciót is
❤️‍🔥 (2023-04-30 08:05:14+00:00): hi, did you mean to delete all these roads? they are visible in both sources you linked to
❤️‍🔥 (2023-05-01 06:44:05+00:00): hey, i didn't hear back from you so I've added these roads back. all the names are still there, thanks for adding those the other day
Deishelon (2023-05-01 06:49:15+00:00): Hi, the roads between Papakiri and Karapapa do not exists on the plan (it will be a residential area, and no road plans there)
The roads above PARISH DRIVE do not exists as its currently under constructions (no roads yet, excavators are digging), roads are not expected there for at least a year, so no point of having them?
❤️‍🔥 (2023-05-01 09:24:19+00:00): hey, if construction hasn't started then the roads can be changed from `highway=construction` to `highway=proposed`, like other parts of milldale. I changed them to construction based on the massive earthworks I saw about 6 months ago, which is now visible in the editor (you need to choose "Bing Aerial Imagery")

regarding the laneways within each residential block, you can see them faintly on the PDF, similar to the existing back-alleys in Milldale which are tagged as `highway=living_street` or `highway=service` + `service=driveway` (e.g. https://osm.org/way/725720791)
Jakka (2023-10-18 07:30:07+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3945573#map=19/51.08121/4.34951
Naamgeving van deze weg is fout
"name=Private ontsluitingweg"
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/149165448 Graag aanpassing
Jakka (2023-10-18 07:57:41+00:00): Indien er gebieden "niet toegankelijk" zijn maar er zijn paden wegen in dan laat je deze best staan. Hulpdiensten kunnen deze wel gebruiken. Zie: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property
ma-rt-in (2023-05-01 12:24:55+00:00): Hallo,

ich habe "Zum Warsteiner Sepp "(302137728)  mal entsprechende deiner angefügten Note angepasst.
In Vespucci gibt es die Funktion geschlossene Objekte entsprechend zu bearbeiten.

vg
mariotomo (2023-05-01 07:11:36+00:00): hola. no me cuadra la descripción en el documento, que en su página 247 dicta: »Desde la desembocadura de la Quebrada Tubonte en el Río Cricamola, se recurre aguas arriba esta quebrada hasta su nacimiento, y desde aquí, en línea recta, a la cima del Cerro Umandú.«
Sin embargo, has trazado la línea de la desembocadura hasta el cerro, no del nacimiento.
sigue además la pregunta, de dónde copias los nombres de los cerros.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135523631
silversurfer83 (2023-04-30 06:28:34+00:00): Gude und Grüße nach Kassel,

ich hätte da mal eine Bitte:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
Danke :)
Leonar25 (2023-05-01 04:16:13+00:00): Buenas Noches.
La vía que cruza los cuatro carriles fue eliminada.
Ahora es una vía rápida.
ovruni (2023-05-01 04:26:10+00:00): No se a que via te refieres en este conjunto de cambios, aquí solo se han modificado areas grass. ¿Puedes especificar el id de la via en cuestión para corregirlo?
Saludos
user_5359 (2023-05-01 10:49:50+00:00): Hallo! Bitte sieh Dir mal meine Korrektur vom Schlüssel #  in http://www.osm.org/way/555423718/history an.
aceman444 (2023-06-27 20:34:19+00:00): Tie adresy neboli nutne zle... Ale ked uz ste ich chceli presunut na vchody, preco ste ich museli vymazat a urobit nove body?
aceman444 (2023-07-10 21:28:11+00:00): Aha, a tie vchody pozeram su na dost vymyslenych miestach, len presun adresy na najblizsie miesto na obvode budovy, pritom v skutocnosti su inak. Taktiez tu pisete zdroj minvskaddress 2023-03 ale nic ste z neho neprevzali, len presunuli existujuce adresy, ale nepridali z toho zdroja znacky ref:minvskaddress ... No naozaj uplne zbytocne zmeny toto. Musim to vratit.
ma-rt-in (2023-04-30 13:28:12+00:00): Hallo,

danke für das anpassen der Daten, jedoch entspricht das nicht dem was es wohl sein soll bzw. das was es werde sollte.
Ich korrigiere es für dich.

vg
molind (2023-05-11 09:30:03+00:00): During this change you deleted name tag from relation 286342. Please be careful next time.
Herman Lee (2023-05-20 13:30:40+00:00): During this change you deleted name tag from relation 10235190. Please be careful next time.
Herman Lee (2023-05-20 13:41:52+00:00): You have deleted many name tag of relations. I hope it is just a small mistake when you editing. Please be careful next time.(It cost time to review such changesets  ╮(╯﹏╰）╭)
Dimitar155 (2023-04-30 13:28:03+00:00): Здравей Пламен,

Изглежда че в тази промяна и в следващата е станало малко мазало в района на София и по-голямо мазало около центъра на Варна. Оправих проблема в София, но във Варна ще е по-трудно, тъй като инструмента за връщане на промени не може да избере само точките на преместените сгради (в тази промяна има променени работни времена и номера на електрически стълбове). Можеш ли да го оправиш по някакъв начин?

Поздрави,
Митко
plamen (2023-04-30 18:07:58+00:00): Здравей и мерси за обаждането.
Върнах и двата changeset-a - tozi i 135525950.
My fault. Sorry.
Този пъгин наистина не прилага избирателно, не знам защо. Нещо е бъгнат и той.
Виж, погледни пак в София, ако можеш, моля.
Поздрави.
Dimitar155 (2023-04-30 18:29:09+00:00): Всичко е наред в София, изглежда че и във Варна е наред.

По спомени, JOSM може да маркираш, това което искаш да качиш и от File (или както се казваше първото меню от горния ляв ъгъл) трябва да има опция "Upload selection" (или "Upload selected elements" или нещо подобно).
plamen (2023-04-30 18:39:41+00:00): Да, има, но за по-сигурно върнах всичко. Ако видиш пак нещо такова, връщай смело, който е сбъркал - да не е бъркал :)
plamen (2023-04-30 18:02:39+00:00): reverted
user_5359 (2023-05-01 11:02:01+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/10857514881.  Is this a school or a church?
Jrachi (2023-05-01 06:40:19+00:00): Ciao.
Unendo i due pezzi di strada (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1167490712) hai "rotto" la relazione (11105595) del percorso M39
Sei capace di sistemare?
jaap de vries (2023-05-05 06:39:50+00:00): Je geeft aan, ook op andere plaatsen, dat de aed operator Stichting AED Dukenburg betreft. Als ik bij hun kijk zie ik enkel aed locaties in Dukenburg en Lindenholt https://aeddukenburg.nl/blog/67-aed-s-in-dukenburg-en-lindenholt maar niet in Oud en Nieuw West. Graag alles nalopen, aanpassen en beter opletten aub !
elsy1 (2023-04-30 09:55:49+00:00): ویرایش شما باعث تخریب خیابان ها شده، ویرایش برگشت داده شد
Carto'Cité (2023-09-23 10:54:59+00:00): Attention la piste était déjà décrite séparément, en l'ajoutant à nouveau elle est maintenant en doublon. Il faut la pettre en cycleway:left/right=separate pour éviter ça 🙂
À ta disposition pour en discuter.
Charles de Carto’Cité
Carto'Cité (2023-09-23 10:55:30+00:00): Je parle de ce que tu as ajouté ici :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28115435
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/158055056
Charles
maciek-szn (2023-04-30 08:36:42+00:00): Zmiana została wycofana. Pisownia wyrazu „aleja” wielką literą jest niezgodna z zasadami języka polskiego.
❤️‍🔥 (2023-05-01 06:52:50+00:00): hey, you requested a review on a few of your recent edits - they all look good, thanks for making these improvements :)
Vas111 (2024-06-20 18:08:03+00:00): Hello,
Could I know why you tagged the A90 dual carriageway as foot=no? There's no restriction as far as I know.
Domkot_Free (2023-05-08 14:06:15+00:00): Hello, my friend. Thank you for your contribution to OSM
I strongly advise you to use the function of aligning building corners at 90° with Q-key
LucJanHornstra (2023-04-30 09:38:39+00:00): Hello, this way a trial by me, but I did not want to really issue it. Please delete. Sorry for any inconvenience. I am new...
Thanks a lot.
wkdgs (2023-05-02 14:14:39+00:00): I have reverted it. If you have questions or need help with something, you can always ask in the OpenStreetMap Forum:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135527621
Rainero (2023-04-30 08:42:49+00:00): Leiðrétting CS-útskýring:  Skessugarður og leiðin þangað.
Souce = Survey, Mapbox aerial image
BCNorwich (2023-05-01 07:21:48+00:00): Hi, Your gate was not a barrier to the highway as it was separate from the highway. I've added a highway node and tagged it as barrier=gate, the gate will now be a restriction to the highway.

Regards Bernard.
user_5359 (2023-05-01 10:52:04+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1167496132 (one of two objects). What ist the mean of the tags (no other OSM keys exist)
ADDED_DATE = 2018/08/22
BEGIN = 2018/08/14 07:02:28.000
DURATION = 01:18:25
END = 2018/08/14 08:20:53.000
LENGTH = 12.227882961640857
PROJ_CODE = AB
UID = AB065T2A01
WEEKDAY = Tuesday
user_5359 (2023-05-01 10:54:16+00:00): I also suspect that you may not have understood a relation. It is a collection of existing roads.