piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
jodd (2023-03-04 22:38:30+00:00): Hallo oldme68,

danke, dass du dich bei Openstreetmap beteiligst. Bei deiner Änderung hier ist wohl etwas schiefgegangen. Du hast den Haltestellennamen um eine Adresse ergänzt. War das ein Versehen? Die Haltestelle war vor deiner Änderung bereits korrekt benannt.

Bitte schau auch deine anderen Änderungen durch. Dir scheinen ähnliche Fehler ein paar mal passiert zu sein.

VG jodd
jodd (2023-03-08 22:07:46+00:00): Hallo oldme68,
ich habe deine Änderungen der Haltestellennamen (diese Änderung und weitere) wieder rückgängig gemacht, sodass die Haltestellen wieder korrekt benannt sind: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133457261
Bei Fragen kannst du mich gerne auch per PM kontaktieren. 
VG jodd
oldme68 (2023-03-09 13:37:44+00:00): Hallo liebe VG jodd,
Vielen Dank für Deine Mühe und Deine Hilfe! Bitte entschuldige das angerichtete Chaos. Leider hatte ich mir die Haltestellen nicht notiert und war deshalb nicht in der Lage, es zu ändern. Ich gelobe Besserung. Liebe Grüße oldme68
Branko Kokanovic (2023-03-02 18:36:15+00:00): Hvala za dodavanje. Ne znam samo jel ima ta stanica neko ime osim "Policija". Ako ima, možda bolje to staviti. I verovatno treba izbrisati ime "Policija" sa zgrade sada kada si dodao tačku:) Samo nastavi da dodaješ ako još nešto vidiš!:)
mavl (2023-04-23 15:51:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:59:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
Fizzie-DWG (2024-01-07 05:25:23+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145978840
mavl (2023-04-23 16:00:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:54:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
DaveF (2023-03-01 17:16:07+00:00): That's not the correct bridge in the wikidata photo:

Please update to:
https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/179573
mavl (2023-04-23 15:49:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:09:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:48:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:50:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:58:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
antonr (2023-03-04 19:29:15+00:00): Hej chlor,

Når man sletter ting, der stadig kan ses på luftfotos, risikerer man at nogen kommer forbi og genindtegner senere (de kan jo ikke se den slettede bygning). En løsning er at undlade at slette, men i stedet ændre tagging fra fx building=yes til was:building=yes. Se evt. mere her: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

mvh
antonr
chlor (2023-03-04 21:06:10+00:00): Hvis nogen forholder sig til virkeligheden via gamle luftfotos, har ikke noget med mig at gøre.
Hvis nogen tegnede matriklen af hvad der var 1944, så ville de se meget anderledes ud.
Jeg syntes egentlig bare du skulle rejecte min ændring, og så lader vi det blive ved det.
Jeg er ejer grunden. Jeg ved hvad der er på den. Hvad andre kan se rager mig egentlig en skid. Undskyld mit profane sprogbrug, men gamle luftfoto er ret ligegyldige.
antonr (2023-03-05 01:24:04+00:00): Hejsa, 

Jeg ser ingen grund til at afvise din ændring som jo afspejler virkeligheden på allerfornemste vis.

En meget udbredt praksis indenfor OSM-kortlægning er at se på luftfotos (de allernyeste! ikke fra 1944) og så få kortet til at afspejle fotos. Min kommentar var egentlig blot ment som et tip til at undgå at nogen på den måde omgør dine 100 oktan højkvalitetsændringer :-)

Mvh
mavl (2023-04-23 15:50:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:10:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:51:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:51:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:47:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
map per (2023-03-04 08:15:52+00:00): Hello Garmin-User,

I reverted the fantasy edit (1) by Ciara05 that caused the intersecting boundaries entirely.

Best regards
map per

(1) https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133175080
user_177389 (2023-03-04 14:31:47+00:00): Hello map per,  

yes, I had already seen it. When reverting, lines that I had touched were not correctly reverted (conflicts?). It should be right now.

Best regards,  
Mario
map per (2023-03-04 17:29:49+00:00): Oh, thanks! I overlooked that.
mavl (2023-04-23 16:08:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
xkillah (2023-03-18 12:38:11+00:00): please don't set public_transport=platform on non-functional stations since it makes many   renderers (including Mapnik) to render them as normal stations. This is very misleading.
emersonveenstra (2023-03-02 11:30:14+00:00): Hi,

Looks like you missed fixing a couple invalid turn restrictions: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6201081 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6366200, would you mind fixing them? Thanks!
BCNorwich (2023-03-04 08:44:11+00:00): Hi, The tracks Way: 55805214, Way: 1150481901 and Way: 1150414262 make a very long ford, probably mistakenly. There is no need to make such large changesets it only makes checking your own work almost impossible. Hence continued mistakes.

I've not made corrections but left the fords for you to see.

Regards Bernard
user_5359 (2023-03-24 16:22:20+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1138373181 (one of 1940 objects). What is the meaning of the tag add:quarter? Did you mean addr:quarter?

Also what is the meaning of the tags
border_col = RGB(128,128,128)
border_sty = Solid
border_wid = 1
closed = YES
fill_color = RGB(0,255,255)
fill_style = Solid Fill
gm_type = unknown Area Type
layer = building
? I assume this a keys from your unknown import source. Please clean this data from OSM (or take the right keys)!
mavl (2023-04-23 15:53:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:57:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:49:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:56:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:47:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
PeeWee32 (2023-03-11 08:14:42+00:00): Hoi EOSfoto

Zou je eens kunnen kijken wat hier gebeurd is. Er lijken nogal wat wegen nu dubbel voor de komen. Bv https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1149201834 en https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1150487672 zijn de zelfde. Met de validator van JOSM kom je nog een paar overlappende wegen tegen. Wellicht had een een filter in JOSM aan staan oid. Als je er niet uitkomt geef dan maar door dan wil ik wel een poging wagen het op te lossen. Groet Peter
eggie (2023-03-16 08:00:47+00:00): Hoi Peter...
Ik heb het proberen de reproduceren, maar dat lukt me niet.
Met EOSfoto PB contact gehad.
Het is in meer changesets gebeurd.. Soms wel vier duplicated ways op elkaar.  Ook landuse en water.
Zou het iets met een BUG in JOSM te maken hebben?
Of kun je zoiets met een toetscombinatie voor elkaar krijgen. Wanneer ik dupliceer zie je dat gelijk. Dan ligt het er net naast. 
Of toch die filter? 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133279209
en inderdaad hier 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133222422

Groet
eggie
PeeWee32 (2023-03-16 18:10:18+00:00): Hoi Eggie. Begrijp ik dat je met EOSfoto contact hebt gehad?  Had hij ook geen idee hoe dit is gekomen?  Ik heb zo ook geen idee hoe dit kan. Wellicht eens op het forum navragen of iemand dit herkent?
eggie (2023-03-16 18:55:58+00:00): PB gestuurd..
eggie (2023-03-16 19:03:01+00:00): https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/josm-error-duplication/54382

Zou het zoiets kunnen zijn?
PeeWee32 (2023-03-16 19:16:08+00:00): klinkt wel heel plausibel. Ik dacht .. laat ik in dat forum draadje deze changeset ook even melden maar ... ik lijkt niet te kunnen reageren daar. Vreemd.
eggie (2023-03-16 19:37:59+00:00): Het is een forumdraadje afkomstig van het oude forum..
MadelNL (2023-03-20 14:03:50+00:00): Ik heb alle commentaren gelezen...
Ik kan het niet verklaren, het lijkt wel of JOSM het idd zelf doet, maar ik zal JOSM de-installeren en opnieuw installeren, kijken wat dat brengt.
Voorlopig nog laptoploos: het erkende reparatiestation had het verkeerde onderdeel besteld... :(
eggie (2023-03-20 14:26:32+00:00): Het moet hoop ik niet uit China komen..  :)

Zit ook te denken aan een toets combinatie die je veel gebruikt.
CTRL-D.. maar als ik dan dupliceer dan komt het object niet op dezelfde plaats.
Succes met het onderdeel.

Groet
eggie
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-03-13 22:03:29+00:00): golf=cartpath is not compatible with barrier=wall ar leisure=garden.
Also why the deleted features?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133179214
mavl (2023-04-23 16:06:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
paranapiacabeiro (2023-03-17 19:17:09+00:00): Esse zig zag fora da realidade é projeto ou já fizeram as devidas alterações pra legalização da pedra lisa?
Samwel Kyando_Import Account (2023-03-02 07:04:38+00:00): Hi Palolo
you created an unclassified road here which duplicated with the original tertiary road.

so can you fix this..

Thanks 
sam
Palolo (2023-03-02 16:38:40+00:00): Thanks for the note, only one of the routes should be tertiary and the GPS traces show that the most used route is the one that goes through Madala on the west.
Cheers
mavl (2023-04-23 16:11:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:52:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
map per (2023-03-09 19:40:57+00:00): Hello Sinduja Sindu,

I reviewed this changeset and everything looks good.
The only suggestion I have is to square buildings. In ID you can do that using the 'q' shortcut.

Best regards
map per
mavl (2023-04-23 16:11:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:05:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
PlaneMad (2023-03-01 20:20:43+00:00): Hi, many thanks for your translation updates to Sirsi.

Have corrected the place tag to town since Siri is still not a municipal corporation and has less than 1lakh population.
mavl (2023-04-23 16:07:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:52:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
eggie (2023-03-01 18:47:33+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback Tip...  In OSM taggen we bedrijven bij op de adresnodes..  Dus niet op de gebouwomtrek.

Kijk je nog even?  

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
philippec (2023-03-01 19:22:24+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1150500045#map=19/50.99917/4.48847&layers=D
Ik krijg de drie paaltjes er niet op.
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=700331501814704
Jakka (2023-03-01 19:31:43+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10702667913
mavl (2023-04-23 16:04:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:50:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
Noen (2023-03-01 18:24:15+00:00): Please use a more specific access tag where appropriate. In this case "motor_vehicle=destination", as cycling or walking through "Gjøkbakken" is not prohibited.
user_18570134 (2023-03-02 13:38:23+00:00): Hi Noen! Thank you for your feedback. I added the tag motor_vehicle=destination to indicate that motorized vehicle traffic is restricted on this highway.
eggie (2023-03-01 18:50:23+00:00): Tag svp op de adresnodes .. Dus niet dubbel taggen op de gebouwomtrekken. Voeg de aard van het bedrijf toe. Bv office=company  Pas dan zie je de naam op de adresnode renderen.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-03-01 18:57:59+00:00): Bedrijfsinfo overgezet naar de adresnodes..   Info gebouwen verwijderd.
eggie (2023-03-01 19:02:56+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
NadineDaese (2023-03-02 07:26:52+00:00): Dankuwel. Ik ben vrijwilliger bij vzw Grote Routepaden. Ik ben blij dat het gecontroleerd wordt. Ik heb een stuk van de streekgr Uilenspiegel afgestapt en notities gemaakt over de ondergrond. Ik heb nu eentje aangepast en wacht de reactie af om de andere aan te passen. 
Als ik hier toch al een vraag mag stellen. Volgens ik begrijp dient de ondergrond van de straat ingegeven als die verschillend is van het voetpad of fietspad en indien er geen afzonderlijk pad op de map is aangegeven.
eggie (2023-03-02 07:58:11+00:00): Dag Nadine...

Het is van belang om altijd de ondergrond aan te geven en dus zo specifiek mogelijk.
Daar kunnen routers dan rekening mee houden.
paved en unpaved zijn erg algemeen. 
Dus het is inderdaad beter om asphalt, paving_stones, gravel, fine_gravel e.d. te taggen.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Key:surface

Verder kan een tracktype meegeven worden. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Template:NL:Map_Features:tracktype
Oorspronkelijk eigenlijk bedoeld als specificatie voor tracks, maar ook algemeen gebruikt.

Nog verfijnder is smootness=
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:smoothness

Dus genoeg te doen.
Overigens zien de meeste routers wegen vanaf residential/unclassified per default als verhard. Dat geldt ook voor highway=cycleway
Veel plezier met mappen..
eggie
eggie (2023-03-02 08:09:33+00:00): 'k Zie alleen dat de straatnaam hier verkeerd is. De straat heet volgens Kadaster/ BGT eigenlijk Grotendam.  Zal het zo aanpassen. 

MVG
eggie
NadineDaese (2023-03-02 18:03:03+00:00): Ok en wanneer weet ik indien hetgeen ik heb gewijzigd goed bevonden is?
eggie (2023-03-02 18:26:46+00:00): Dag Nadine.. Bij OSM is niemand die op een knopje drukt en iets goedkeurt.
Het gaat dus met vallen en opstaan. Fouten worden niemand aangerekend.
Meestal kijken ervaren mappers in het begin mee en geven tips.
Mapse..
eggie
NadineDaese (2023-03-02 18:30:31+00:00): Waarom staat hetgeen ik heb aangepast dan nog op “onbekend”?
eggie (2023-03-02 18:35:14+00:00): Waar zie je dat onbekend.. ?
NadineDaese (2023-03-02 18:43:29+00:00): Hier
https://mapcomplete.osm.be/theme.html?z=17&lat=51.32347&lon=3.48707&userlayout=https%3A%2F%2Fraw.githubusercontent.com%2Fhgcvm%2Fmcsurfacegr%2Fmain%2Fdata%2FStreek-GR%20Uilenspiegel.json&language=nl#way/255528802
eggie (2023-03-02 19:27:31+00:00): Don't worry...   Je wijzigingen (en die van mij) zijn gewoon doorgevoerd in de data van OSM

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/7618122

Wellicht lopen de updates van die app gewoon nog achter. 
Gr eggie
NadineDaese (2023-03-02 19:29:41+00:00): Okido. Thx voor de uitleg!
ghostrider44 (2023-07-31 09:35:19+00:00): Hallo townlion,
wegen der Baustelle der Fa. Paulus wurde die Treppe 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/260836420
im unteren Bereich Richtung Westen verlegt. Dies habe ich am 24.11.2022 angepasst. Nun sehe ich, dass die Treppe wieder nach dem alten Luftbild eingezeichnet ist, was aber nicht mehr stimmt. Laut Chronik hast du am 1.3.2023 hier Änderungen vorgenommen. Bringst du die Treppe wieder auf den aktuellen Stand?
Gruß ghostrider44
Scout Jens (2023-08-03 06:32:22+00:00): Es wird vermutlich einige Zeit dauern, bis ich dort wieder hinkommen. Wie muss es denn geändert werden? Wenn ich etwas falsch eingetragen habe, tut es mir leid. Viele Grüße, Jens
ghostrider44 (2023-08-03 09:20:32+00:00): Hallo townlion,
bevor die Baustelle dort eingerichtet werden konnte, musste zuerst die Treppe im unteren Teil verlegt werden. Was vorher Richtung Osten zeigte, zeigt nun Richtung Westen.  Ich habe sie nun verlegt. Sobald neue Luftbilder vorhanden sind, kann man sie ja noch besser anpassen. Ob die Treppe momentan noch gesperrt ist, weiß ich nicht. Vielleicht komme ich in nächster Zeit mal dazu, die Stelle nochmals anzuschauen.
Gruß ghostrider44
Noen (2023-03-01 18:26:31+00:00): This road seems more like a driveway than a residential street to me.
user_18570134 (2023-03-02 14:28:51+00:00): Thanks, Noen! I changed the classification of this highway as per your suggestion.
Vokoun (2024-03-24 09:04:23+00:00): Zdravím, směl bych znát zdroj? Jinak některé úseky vypadají značně nereálně stočené, nicméně u plánovaných úseků by to asi šlo tolerovat.

Jste mino jiné také autor(ka) navrhovaných TT v Plzni. Myslím si, že jsou to v dnešní době věc opravdu hodně hypotetická a ani jsem o tom nenašel žádné aktuální zprávy (samozřejmě mimo Vinice). Nicméně, oceňuji, že je to uvedeno alespoň v poznámce. Jste tuším člen(ka) matrix kanálu, nahodím tam (či v talkcz), zda jsou takto hypotetické návrhy do OSM vhodné.
Pěkný den

Vokoun
Fjana (2024-03-24 09:38:33+00:00): Zdravím!
Návrhy na vedení trati můžete najít v územních plánech obcí, a to jak v textových tak i výkresových částech. Osobně si myslím, že realizace této trati do roku 2050 je tak 50:50, na rozdíl od obchvatů a přeložek, jejichž realizace je víceméně jistá.

Ohledně plánovaných tratí máte l pravdu s tím, že značná část z nich nebude nejspíše realizována, vycházím z webových stránek plzeňských tramvají. Pokud si myslíte, že některé trati na mapě být nemají, jelikož se jejich realizace nejspíše neuskuteční, můžete je případně odebrat. V současném územním plánu jsou zaneseny nebo zmíněný přeložky smyčky Skvrňany, Světovar, Mikulášské náměstí, odstavné koleje na Košutce a tramvajové trati do Kasáren a na Vinice, všechno ostatní jsou většinou historické rezervy, které jsou setrvačností udržované až do dneška.

Fjana
Vokoun (2024-03-24 10:25:26+00:00): Díky za odpověď, upřímně, v územních plánech je všechno možné (i nemožné), ale za použití proposed se to asi nechat může. smyčky a Vinice bych určitě nechal, tam je realizace vesměs téměř jistá, či pravděpodobná. Pokud máte přístup k matrix chatu, přečtěte si prosím krátkou diskusi na toto téma. Asi není nutné Vaše úpravy mazat (čiňte dle Vašeho uvážení, já to po diskusi v matrix chatu mazat nebudu, nicméně tratě do Valchy a Doubravky považuji za hodně nereálné), ale bylo by vhodné přidat zdroje a provédst další drobné úpravy.
Díky