piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
idkwhatname2use (2026-04-22 08:43:45+00:00): Why did you change the freeway ramps to secondary links near olympic & santa fe?
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-04-22 15:42:42+00:00): Because it's possible to access those roads without using the freeway(s).
joost schouppe (2026-04-28 11:01:20+00:00): Je hebt hier een heel lang segment aangeduid als "sluis". Dat lijkt me niet de bedoeling; ik draai het terug.
MapBtch (2026-04-28 16:14:09+00:00): tnx.. ja, hier heb ik een foutje gemaakt.  Ik was wel bezig met een sluisje, maar die was heel klein.  heb waarschijnlijk verkeerde object geselecteerd
joost schouppe (2026-04-29 07:44:55+00:00): Overkomt de beste! Kijk misschien nog even na of die kleine sluis dan effectief OK is. Ik weet niet wat je precies bedoelt met "klein", maar voor de zekerheid: het is enkel een sluis als het voor boten bedoeld is en een vaste kamer heeft om die te verhogen/verlagen. Zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lock
MapBtch (2026-04-29 20:19:26+00:00): geen idee wat er gebeurd is - een lock was sowieso niet de bedoeling. ik was bezig met een weir (stuw) - dus je hebt helemaal gelijk, geen sluis/lock.
NeisBot (2026-04-16 22:12:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 7 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/847279137 v10 | 5 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/7906389362 v2
https://osm.org/node/7906331012 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=181433357
Enock4seth (2026-05-02 10:28:09+00:00): Hi ADDOMAN, is this a publicly visible name/feature or private residence? What exactly are you trying to map?
NeisBot (2026-04-16 22:42:39+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 14 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/785046168 v3 | 7 crossings
https://osm.org/way/135234966 v13 | 7 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=181434016
Moenghus (2026-04-16 23:12:33+00:00): I addressed the intended edits highlighted by NeisBot
iandees (2026-04-17 01:36:04+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7334505268 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181436577, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
Moenghus (2026-04-17 08:54:37+00:00): Hello, thanks for commenting. I thought I corrected for these issues last night, but maybe something didnt save properly?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181434380
and 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181434409
and 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181434454
Natfoot (2026-05-26 17:18:34+00:00): Reviewing your edits and it looks good.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181434106
jtn20 (2026-04-17 18:52:53+00:00): This changeset moved the address node for 22 Newmarket Road; I assume in error. I've put it back (in changeset/181472696).
MapMagics (2026-04-16 23:01:23+00:00): Correction: Comment is "Added address point in Hörgársveit near Staðartunga road. #adt"
matt_ellery (2026-04-17 07:58:45+00:00): Hi Wookey,

Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1500095481 really a building?

All the best,
Matt
Wookey (2026-04-17 09:37:51+00:00): No. It's a business selling campervans. I picked 'caravan dealership' in ID as the closest thing in a bit of a hurry. But I see that sets building=yes on the whole area, which is indeed quite wrong.
I could extend the 'industrial area' to include the van-parking area out the back. Still not sure what the right way to mark the workshop and car-parks as one business is and what the right business tag is if 'caravan dealership' can only be used on the actual building part. Will have a research.
matt_ellery (2026-04-17 15:59:05+00:00): Thanks for confirming. Personally, I would add shop=caravan to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/915836211 and extend the existing landuse (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/368489883) to cover the van parking. It may be worth changing it to landuse=commercial too, depending on what the other building is used for.
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-17 19:33:39+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

Is the following name real?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10232104213
303Bird (2026-04-18 05:40:26+00:00): Sorry, no idea if I'm doing this correctly, but there is a flock camera on the NE corner of 56th/Burnham West Allis on a lamp post, pointed west.  Did I explain that right in the map?
HellMap (2026-04-18 18:09:53+00:00): This line https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1500109234 has no tags.
matheusgomesms (2026-04-29 11:39:52+00:00): Oi Giovane,

Bastava adicionar a etiqueta de acesso "private". Assim, a via fica privada para todos, menos para ônibus (bus=designated).

Qual sistema você está usando? Vimos suas várias alterações, e queremos que tanto o mapa quanto teu sistema funcione bem.

Vamos conversar!

Matheus
Kovoschiz (2026-04-18 09:20:30+00:00): Are the `=pitch` removed?
Kovoschiz (2026-04-18 09:36:11+00:00): (What has the roofs become?)
Kovoschiz (2026-04-18 09:36:45+00:00): 2. Why   connect the road below to the `=turning_circle` ?
Kovoschiz (2026-04-18 09:39:16+00:00): 3. Please don't draw a circular line for `=turning_circle` , which are traversable
felipeeugenio (2026-04-17 12:00:54+00:00): Hola. Buenos días. Por favor no usar nombres descriptivos.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181435624
NeisBot (2026-04-17 00:48:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 33 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1500116545 v1 | 6 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1500116557 v1 | 3 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1500116517 v1 | 3 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=181435763
Wildsharky (2026-04-21 03:30:02+00:00):  Partially reverted in changeset id:181541386
NeisBot (2026-04-17 01:09:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 29 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/623972247 v2 | 6 crossings
https://osm.org/way/623972251 v1 | 6 crossings
https://osm.org/way/623972254 v1 | 6 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/5892003375 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=181436095
iandees (2026-04-17 01:36:23+00:00): Hello! I noticed that nodes https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1093725410, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3681386855, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5892003375 were moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181436586, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
NeisBot (2026-04-17 01:12:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 28 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1362798456 v3 | 11 crossings
https://osm.org/way/274928654 v3 | 7 crossings
https://osm.org/way/172050500 v6 | 5 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/1829974102 v4

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=181436121
iandees (2026-04-17 01:36:29+00:00): Hello! I noticed that nodes https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1829974102, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2795977279, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9198782384 were moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181436587, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
NeisBot (2026-04-17 01:39:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13736421999 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Contabilidad Digital Office"
---
Por ejemplo, una versión más neutral y objetiva de tu texto podría ser: "Contabilidad Digital Office"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
Tomas Straupis (2026-04-17 06:58:43+00:00): How does it work? On 2026-01-02 you've added a barrier "based on local observations" (good!), but now you've deleted the same barrier "based on Bing" (not good as barrier will never be visible on such imagery)?
Vandana@28 (2026-04-17 08:12:14+00:00): Three months ago, we created the barrier based on internal evidence. However, following user feedback, we reviewed OpenStreetMap (OSM) various aerial imagery data. Since the imagery confirms the barrier is no longer there, we have reverted the change and removed it
Tomas Straupis (2026-04-17 09:00:06+00:00): Ok, thank you for explanation.
GOwin (2026-04-17 02:19:31+00:00): Hello @msjejdr. Thanks for improving the geometry of these waterways. They also appear to be between 5-7 meters wide, and wateray=river seems to be a more appropriate tag.

https://i.postimg.cc/htbqhH6Y/image.png

RapiD has a measurement panel (2) you can use, to help approximate widths , by drawing temporary line segment for measuring distance (3,4,5), or an existing line (1)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181436710
Kovoschiz (2026-04-18 09:23:01+00:00): Only raised upright sign plates should use `advertising=sign`
NeisBot (2026-04-17 02:48:22+00:00): Hi Shadeslayers09, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 97% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 3 building(s)
- 6 waterway(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=181437424
Joseph R P (2026-04-17 21:58:50+00:00): Maintenance facilities don't really count as true at-grade intersections (or at least ones significant enough to affect road classification) since the driveways are inaccessible to the general public. These ramps could definitely be motorway links.
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-04-19 21:58:55+00:00): Okay, I'll change it back. I see this sort of configuration in many places in Nevada and California. But why use an on/off ramp instead of a street to access it?
woodpeck (2026-04-17 10:19:15+00:00): Dear borbalo_kj, the name:xx tags in OSM are *not* intended for translations. Please do not add translated names to OSM.
iandees (2026-04-17 04:05:51+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3731905010 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181438733, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
NeisBot (2026-04-17 03:54:46+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/510251991 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Metal workshop"
---
Zum Beispiel könnte eine neutralere und sachlichere Version deines Textes lauten: "Metallwerkstatt"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
Eduardo17172 (2026-04-17 20:40:21+00:00): Hola, la vía marcada como oneway se puede ver que es bidireccional. Cuál es la causa del cambio?

Hello, the lane marked as oneway is actually bidirectional. What is the reason for the change?
LakeLouise (2026-04-20 17:18:15+00:00): Hello Eduardo17172. I split the unclassified way and changed (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1084042838) from bidirectional to oneway=yes based on the motorway link (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/704079410) being oneway southbound, and the nearest connected way being bidirectional (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28380549). I see now in December 3rd, 2025 Mapillary (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1477963980700822) that there’s an undigitized way where just south of the motorway link that drivers can turn onto. I will go ahead and change (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1084042838) back to bidirectional. Thank you and happy mapping!
Eduardo17172 (2026-04-21 00:17:00+00:00): Hello again, thanks for your response and edits. I have some important information if you are interested in making more changes near this area:

1. The highway Ruta del Elqui (specifically Ruta 5 between Coquimbo - Los Vilos ) is currently undergoing multiple works due to a recent contract renewal. So many of the changes on the road may be only temporary

2. Highway exits are generally one-way, but the roads they connect to don't always follow the same direction. This is done to avoid creating problems within villages like this one.

Finally, if you ever have any questions about this area, you can contact me on this same website and I'll gladly answer.

Regards,
Eduardo17172
NeisBot (2026-04-17 04:09:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13736626256 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Software office"

#MapWithoutSpam
蕉饼电脑 (2026-04-17 05:21:52+00:00): Reverted
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181439969
Johnwhelan (2026-05-03 17:41:18+00:00): These look like individual buildings to me. Landuse residential is for a group of buildings.
pitfire (2026-04-17 07:33:19+00:00): Die Kinder- und Jugendpraxis Dr. med. Christian Nowakowski (13736670025), v1
ist bereits erfasst!
Chrid (2026-05-12 11:18:31+00:00): den Eintrag sehe ich in der Karte nicht, was mache ich falsch?
pitfire (2026-05-13 10:25:49+00:00): Hi Chrid,
was genau Du nicht findest ist nicht erkennbar. Habe jetzt die Praxen etwas Angepasst. Schau bitte mal ob es so passt.
VG pitfire
NeisBot (2026-04-17 05:03:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/6784983118 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Village named after company"

#MapWithoutSpam
NorthCrab_upload (2026-04-19 23:31:53+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1500142619

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
mueschel (2026-04-19 10:06:54+00:00): Please stop these edits! You're creating duplicates of streets that are already existing.
Glassman (2026-04-18 02:12:27+00:00): #TIP: sometimes you just need to adjust the imagery offset. Look under the backgound layer icon in the editor. The imagery offset adjustment is towards the bottom.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181439924
Herwescheluc (2026-04-20 19:54:35+00:00): Hallo, geozeisig,

dieser Weg wurde vor 17 Jahren angelegt, "Taunus Wanderführer" lässt auf ein Buch tippen, im Netz ist jedenfalls nichts zu finden, was dem entsprechen könnte. Auch Bilder auf komoot und Mapillary geben keine Hinweise auf die Existenz dieses Weges her, sondern zeigen nur Symbole anderer Routen. Hältst Du es nicht auch für sehr wahrscheinlich, das der Weg gar nicht mehr existiert?

Grüße aus Herborn

Andreas
geozeisig (2026-04-21 05:32:46+00:00): Hallo Andreas,

du könntest recht haben. Und in OSM sollten nur Wege aufgenommen werden, die in der Natur ausgezeichnet wurden. Also wenn du ihn löscht hab ich nichts dagegen, aber nicht nur ein disused: davor setzen.

Viele Grüße

Dieter
Herwescheluc (2026-04-21 07:01:40+00:00): Guten Morgen, Dieter,

Relation gelöscht, keine Segmente mehr vorhanden, siehe: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181612013#map=13/50.49925/8.36902&layers=N

Schöne Woche noch!

Andreas
Minh Nguyen (2026-06-28 06:34:20+00:00): border_type=* isn’t totally redundant. Not everything at level 2 is a country and not everything at level 4 is a state, even in Australia. As it is, the search function on this site is only able to label Victoria as a state because of place=state. However, the place=* classification scheme is very limited, without established values for things like territories and unable to express Melbourne as a city.
OSMthechallenger (2026-04-20 01:27:52+00:00): Здравствуйте, когда Вы занимаетесь правками для изменения домов\адресов, подобными этой, советую делать одну большую правку вместо нескольких маленьких.

С уважением, OSMthechallenger
dijitr (2026-04-17 06:27:24+00:00): I forgot to add: the main reason for the trails not being approved is due to them going through private property.
fortera_au (2026-04-18 05:47:37+00:00): Hi, if they're informal and/or private, they should still be mapped but marked as such.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181441652
grzegorz75jan (2026-04-17 08:09:30+00:00): To przejście to chodnik czy ścieżka.
silversurfer83 (2026-04-19 19:24:49+00:00): Moin Daniel :)

Danke, dass du hilfst die Datenbank aktuell zu halten.

Der Punkt des Tores sollte auch auf dem Zufahrtsweg liegen, da er sonst keine Wirkung entfaltet.

Bei OSM werden auch Wege auf Privatgelände erfasst. Bitte lösche sowas in Zukunft nicht mehr. Der Zusatz access=private ist ausreichend und die von dir schön erfassten Tore machen den Willen der Besitzer*innen mehr als deutlich.

Bei Fragen immer raus damit

silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181441813
NeisBot (2026-04-17 06:36:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13736754146 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Print shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisBot (2026-04-17 06:39:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13736754146 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Publicitate fabrica"

#MapWithoutSpam
CAM-Gerlach (2026-05-26 00:52:37+00:00): Reverted the SEO spam road name change, removed POI name from entire building and merged three SEO-added POIs for Bill Bone law into one in changeset 183181851

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183181851
eggie (2026-04-17 07:35:21+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback In dat geval cyclestreet =yes en traffic_sign=NL:L51 toevoegen
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-04-17 07:42:31+00:00): motor_vehicle=designated verwijderd
Dat is trouwens default op wegen en hoef je niet toe te voegen.
eggie (2026-04-17 07:45:21+00:00): Je heb hier twee wegen op elkaar geplakt We noemen dat duplicated ways. Wanneer je iets wilt veranderen zul je de eigenschappen van de bestaande weg moeten aanpassen. Niet een nieuwe weg op de oude intekenen.
Ik pas even wat aan.
Ook is de routering voor fietsers verstoord. Die mogen immerd tegen de oneway=yes inrijden.