piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
GrabTH_Tanyamai (2025-10-24 05:00:39+00:00): Hi, sorry for lately reply.

All of the deletions were intentional because of the duplicates/overlaps of landuse.
ilias_ (2025-10-08 08:01:29+00:00): Hi,

User red0 changed the name of this street to Boulevard Mahdi Elmandjra (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/36361493/history/20) and I added Rue des Papillons as the old name. red0 precised source:name is https://www.achkayen.com/292007/.html

It's in Arabic but I'll translate it for you: Boulevard Mahdi Elmandjra is officially the new name of Rue des Papillons.

You basically ignored all of this simply based on a maps report and changed the name back to Rue des Papillons, adding Boulevard Mahdi Elmandjra as alt_name. This is wrong. You could have simply commented previous changesets or sent me or red0 a message asking your questions.

In any case, please, revert your changes. Have a nice day!
MountSuckling (2025-10-10 04:40:43+00:00): Hi ilias_, thank you for reaching out. In the future, I will be sure to check history more thoroughly and reach out if I have any questions before making changes. For this specific street name, we received maps user feedback with a photo showing the street name is Rue des Papillons. I was unable to verify the source provided by red0. Could you please share any other sources or where within the source provided by red0 shows the updated name? I will be happy to adjust the street name once we can verify the name change. Thank you!
ilias_ (2025-10-10 11:08:39+00:00): That's because the old street sign was not removed.

Here's a more official source:

https://www.facebook.com/maarifcom/posts/pfbid02p4uzCoXE4DYvTwQhMtXxebBscLoDqaijdKZ26onpzuT6PDzBrASvbhXrq5Jq3opRl

It's from the official page of the district where the street is. Translation:

Honoring the nation’s great figures… As part of an initiative by the Al Maarif District Council, and with the approval of the Casablanca City Council, the park located in the Al Batha neighborhood has been named after the artist and minister Thouria Jebrane, the street formerly known as Mammar Loud has been named after Minister Mohamed El Ouafa, and Dr. Mahdi Elmandjra’s name has been given to Rue des Papillons."
MountSuckling (2025-10-10 22:29:09+00:00): Thank you for your input! Unfortunately Facebook does not have a compatable license for use as a source in OSM. However if you would like to make the update based on local knowledge, I’d be more than happy to defer to your edits. Thanks again for understanding!
ilias_ (2025-10-11 01:41:22+00:00): The Facebook post was just to show you that the change is official, not for you to base your changes solely on it. You can make the update based on my local knowledge, e.g. I have local knowledge that this street's name was changed from Rue des Papillons to Boulevard Mahdi Elmandjra.
MountSuckling (2025-10-14 04:25:32+00:00): I have made the updates, have a nice day.
NeisBot (2025-10-08 03:38:35+00:00): Hi Grab(TH)_Tanyamai, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 12 landuse(')

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=172983760
GrabTH_Tanyamai (2025-10-24 05:00:50+00:00): Hi, sorry for lately reply.

All of the deletions were intentional because of the duplicates/overlaps of landuse.
campbelltree (2025-10-09 18:54:05+00:00): Thanks - couldn't tell what street it was on from the station :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172984036
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-02 10:22:13+00:00): Hello!

You used
surface=dirtcc
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1256882228/history

Have you maybe meant
surface=dirt
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
OpenSpacesNotClosedSpaces (2025-12-02 23:58:32+00:00): This was indeed a mistake. Thank you for catching that. Will correct.
Kovoschiz (2025-10-09 04:21:38+00:00): Can you explain what you are trying to do? Mass deletions, and dragged points.
pwbriggs (2025-10-10 23:24:35+00:00): Awesome, thanks for the edit! Based on aerial imagery, it looks like that 3rd lane is a center turn lane, like it is south of the segment you edited. I added some more tags to indicate a center lane, but let me know if that's not the case anymore.

Thanks again, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
houtari (2025-10-11 21:21:28+00:00): "Kuvakkeiden lisäys" ?? Kuulostaa siltä että tässä muokkaukset on tehty kartan visualinen ilme edellä. Se on OSM:n perusajatusten vastaista, sillä OSM on ensisijassa kartta-aineisto eikä muokkauksia pitäisi tehdä sillä perusteella miltä asiat näyttää jollain tietyllä kartalla englanniksi "tagging for the renderer"
houtari (2025-10-11 21:25:09+00:00): "One feature one element" on toinen periaate jota tässä on rikottu, eli yksi kohde - tässä tapauksessa kahluupaikka pitäisi merkitä kartalle vaan kertaalleen. Tässä tapauksessa polkuviiva jossa ford-merkintä riittää. Nyt jos joku lataa itselleen OSM-datan tältä alueelta ja tutkii montako kahluupaikkaa täältä löytyy niin tulos on neljä (kolme pistettä ja yksi viiva) ja se jos mikä vääristää erilaisten kartta-analyysien tekoa. Lisäinfoa tästä periaatteesta ... https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
houtari (2025-10-11 21:26:37+00:00): Tämä ja muut hyvät käytännöt mm. tuo aiemmin mainittu "don't map for the renderer" löytyvät täältä ... https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice
houtari (2025-11-01 13:34:40+00:00): Poistettu ford-arvo pisteeltä, sillä piste kuuluu viivaan jolta tuo ford-arvo jo löytyy. Näin vältetään turhia duplikaatteja.
DLRN (2025-11-08 12:58:50+00:00): Дом снесён еще в ноябре 22 https://t.me/mariupolnow/21160?single
pwbriggs (2025-10-10 23:59:57+00:00): Thanks. Lane tagging is helpful. My main feedback is that it's important to be aware about how long the segment of road you're editing is. Unless the entire segment of roadway has a turn lane, you'll need to split the road line into separate segments where the turn lane starts or ends.

In the iD editor, this can be done by creating/finding the point on the roadway line where the lane configuration changes (double-click the line if the point doesn't already exist). Then select that point where you want to split the road segment, and hit the "X" key (or right click > "split way"). Then you can edit the tags separately for the different segments of road.

But thanks anyway, these edits are useful! Let me know if you have any questions.
Dmitry747 (2025-10-11 00:45:23+00:00): 👍
NeisBot (2025-10-08 05:30:40+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-10-12 05:10:39+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/173017271
melody_Tej (2025-11-28 06:55:07+00:00): Hello BCNorwich
Thank you for mapping!
I Removed level tag.
Please inspect your task carefully before closing.
Happy Mapping!
BCNorwich (2025-11-28 07:07:35+00:00): Hi melody Tej, 
I'll remember that for the future. Actually I wasn't looking at any level tags at all, I don't think they were mentioned in the task description.

Thanks & Regards Bernard.
ntzm (2026-01-12 11:32:29+00:00): Hey, just so you know the tag for this sign https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=53.3616942&lng=-1.406531&z=17&pKey=2396450804144293&x=0.5962414764927684&y=0.2185040727539711&zoom=0.6826511554946744&focus=photo

is maxweightrating:hgv, not maxweight. I have updated the ways now.
ntzm (2026-01-12 11:33:38+00:00): + `maxweightrating:hgv:conditional=no @ destination` due to the "except for access" line.
CanopyFalls (2026-01-13 16:10:05+00:00): O TY TY! Many thanks for the catch!
puchaczowsky (2025-10-08 14:58:29+00:00): pomyliłeś odcinki, w informacji chodziło o Wolin-Troszyn

wycofałem zmianę
Mashin (2025-10-08 08:30:48+00:00): Thanks for the edits! 
It's a bit pity that we don't have access to your imagery to verify those changes. 
But here I would like to point out, that if a building was demolished it should be removed and ideally also new buildings/parking lots drawn in their place. 
In this case it seems like a new gas station was built on this lot?
tkotnala_lyft (2025-10-08 12:09:42+00:00): Hi Mashin,
My name is Tanya, and I'm a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. About my edits, the existing building boundary was demolished based on Lyft-owned aerial imagery (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1VrBP-KPLgteZMn-fA_lAHmpgQ5nXDPd5/view?usp=sharing) from September 2025 and aligned with information from the OSM wiki. The imagery clearly indicates that the structure of the buildings no longer exists.
Regarding the addition of a new building boundary, I understand the importance of mapping the gas station or new boundaries. However, our efforts are mainly focused on drivable areas, reopening roads, redesigning networks, or updating road types post-construction (OSM/wiki/Lyft). Mapping new buildings is currently outside the defined scope.

I have made adjustments in this area. Please feel free to amend our changes if necessary:
Changeset (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173000735)
Please let me know if you have any further questions. The screenshots will be available for a month. Please let me know if you are unable to view them within this timeframe – I could generate them once again. 
Happy Mapping!


Best regards,
Tanya
Mashin (2025-10-08 15:02:09+00:00): Thank you so much for the additional edit and the data share Tanya!
NeisBot (2025-10-08 06:57:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description
NeisRevert (2025-10-12 05:09:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173163334
where the changeset comment is: 
Remove unclear map edits
NeisBot (2025-10-08 07:21:40+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-10-12 05:09:10+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/173022160
CAM-Gerlach (2026-05-24 22:55:39+00:00): Removed remaining SEO spam tags in changeset 183129988

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183129988
YomanNH (2025-10-09 08:58:07+00:00): Cześć,
do parkingu https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1267048665 dodałeś parking=surface. Oznacza to, że jest to plac parkingowy, co nie jest prawdą. Jest to parking przylegający do jezdni, więc powinno być parking=street_side. Widziałem, że w innych edycjach też zdarzało Ci się błędnie dodawać parking=surface.
Pozdrawiam
tmp44 (2025-10-09 09:29:37+00:00): Cześć, dzięki, poprawię
MassCartog (2025-10-08 13:18:59+00:00): Hi welcome to OSM. In this changeset looks like you removed this peak. What was your reason for this?

Please read:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
NeisBot (2025-10-08 07:46:30+00:00): Hi Gilbert Nathan, welcome and thanks for your contribution!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

Based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Updated name to "3""
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
AndyB_66 (2025-10-08 14:31:42+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
Pink Duck (2025-10-08 09:45:35+00:00): You appear to have drawn explicit footpath when the road already had sidewalk=left tag (e.g. Wendene south of roundabout). I've amended the sidewalk tag to value separate. The north-bound grass trod path could also be represented with verge=left tag on the road itself, as nothing physically separating it from road edge. Or a path=desire type.
stukulele (2025-10-08 09:49:32+00:00): Thank you, those are good edits!
fmc_1 (2025-10-10 10:33:23+00:00): Buongiorno Bibo, 

ti segnalo che non mancavano questi stazioni, ora sono doppi. Forse non hai visto le stazioni perché non sono rappresentati da nodi ma da aree (è migliore perché consente di capire l'estensione, la dimensione e l'orientamento della stazione, nonchè di interrogare cosa si trova dentro la stazione. Ho quindi cancellato i nodi superflui.

Saluti
Martin
NeisBot (2025-10-08 08:06:40+00:00): Merhaba Mehmet KERİMOĞLU, hoşgeldiniz ve katkılarınız için teşekkür ederiz!

İşbirliğini kolaylaştırmak ve diğerlerinin düzenlemelerinizi anlamalarına yardımcı olmak için yaptığınız değişikliklere kısa bir açıklama eklemek en iyisidir. Açık yorumlar topluluğun çalışmalarınızı takip etmesine ve daha iyi geri bildirimde bulunmasına yardımcı olur. İyi yorum yazma ipuçlarını burada[1] bulabilirsiniz.

Bu changeset'teki harita düzenlemelerinize dayanarak, bir yorum nasıl olabileceğine dair bir öneri hazırladım: "Düğüm geometrisini ayarladım"
(Auto-translation)
---
Hi Mehmet KERİMOĞLU, welcome and thanks for your contribution!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

Based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Adjusted node geometry"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
citrula (2025-10-08 17:58:50+00:00): The service road you drew goes straight through a curb
rboda (2025-10-09 05:54:35+00:00): Apologies for the mistake I committed. Thank you for the valuable feedback. I look forward to your suggestion/feedback in the future as well. Thank you.
Yunkers (2025-10-08 08:06:11+00:00): https://www.gov.pl/web/gddkia-zielona-gora/mamy-umowe-na-realizacje-obwodnicy-kostrzyna-nad-odra
demon_box (2025-10-08 09:46:34+00:00): Ciao Project srl, ti segnalo che in Italia il civico identifica il punto di accesso (entrata) e NON l'intero edificio. Infatti un edificio può avere più entrate e di conseguenza più numeri civici. 
Quindi hai 2 opzioni: 
1. Se conosci esattamente la posizione (entrata) del civico che stai mappando metti tutti i tags dell'indirizzo su un nodo del perimetro dell'edificio (aggiungendo anche il tag entrance sullo stesso nodo);
2. Se invece non hai questa informazione così precisa devi mettere tutti i tags dell'indirizzo su nodo adiacente ma STACCATO dal poligono dell'edificio.
Ho già proceduto con le correzioni del caso. 
Grazie e BuonMapping!
Nakaner-repair (2025-10-11 13:22:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 173137073 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by BiboORM in Berlin since 2025-09-12 (long-term U-Bahn extensions). We do not map features in earyl planning states. A feasibility study does not mean that this project will be built at all.
citrula (2025-10-08 17:59:52+00:00): description field is not meant to be used for advertising.
BCNorwich (2025-10-08 10:24:53+00:00): Untagged node removed as it serves no purpose.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-11 05:49:07+00:00): Reverted addition of SEO spam POI explicitly sourced from Google Maps with blatant promotion and malformed, misleading or outright incorrect tags

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183953615
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-30 07:54:06+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags/values in changeset 184839643

https://osm.org/changeset/184839643
ManuelB701 (2025-10-15 04:50:32+00:00): Just FYI, you've edited a building part rather than the corresponding outline as you'd do it normally which caused both buildings inside a building (which is an error) and messing up any data consumer expecting the usual stuff.
Emilio L (2025-10-15 06:17:49+00:00): Ok, I wasn't aware of that! Thank you very much for your comment!
LordGarySugar (2026-05-03 01:13:03+00:00): Hi, you managed to paste a der Spiegel article in a number of roof:shape tags here (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1436379982/history/1), I've corrected it.
SurlyRider (2026-05-04 14:31:40+00:00): ooops... I'm sorry. Thx a lot for correcting this. copy&paste must have gone rogue. :|
Sylabowy Kot (2025-10-08 14:55:33+00:00): BDOT tak czy siak daje informacje o części terenu oznaczonego obecnie placu budowy jako zagospodarowanie osiedla, więc można przy okazji się skłaniać ku zmianie zagospodarowania w OSM, jednakże tworzenie drogi na podstawie ortofotomapy pokazującej plac budowy z budynkami otoczonymi ziemią jest mierne jakościowe.
iTSiPoK (2025-10-13 21:11:18+00:00): Kedves Tamás! Valóban megszűnt, én jelentettem a kozkutak oldalán. Helyette van nem messze tőle egy új ivókút. Koordinátája: N47 33.122 E21 37.660
Herwescheluc (2025-10-08 20:05:39+00:00): name > board:title

Ich bin voll bei Dir! 👍

Grüße aus Herborn
thetornado76 (2025-10-09 18:44:49+00:00): Name macht ja auch keinen Sinn in dem Fall
user_5359 (2025-10-09 10:57:37+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/relation/19690619. What is the mean of the tag tid = 101?
map per (2025-10-09 16:11:00+00:00): Good catch, deleted the accidentally uploaded 'tid' value
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-08 21:05:00+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13202359376

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-08 21:44:58+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13202359376

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
AndySchulte (2025-10-13 07:01:05+00:00): I have corrected that, thank you for pointing it out.
Bienson (2025-10-08 23:30:25+00:00): Korrigiert in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173026515
eggie (2025-10-08 09:59:58+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback  Je hebt adresnode 4B verwijderd. Bestaat dat adres niet meer?
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Thvmh (2025-10-08 10:26:27+00:00): Het huisnummer 4B is zoal te zien op de kaart meer noordelijk in het pand. Aan de linkerkant van het pand zijn nieuwe huistnummers aangevraagd. Hiervoor is huisnummer 6 met 6A en 6B uitgegeven. Daarbij is Cloudbear en CBWS nooit op 4B geregistreerd geweest maar altijd op 6B. Vandaar deze wijziging.
eggie (2025-10-08 10:29:10+00:00): Oke.. duidelijk.
Mvg..
eggie
aharvey (2025-11-09 05:11:06+00:00): the operator values shouldn't include square brackets
Nakaner-repair (2025-10-11 13:22:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 173137073 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by BiboORM in Berlin since 2025-09-12 (long-term U-Bahn extensions). We do not map features in earyl planning states. A feasibility study does not mean that this project will be built at all.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-08 21:44:59+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13202384550

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
user_5359 (2025-10-08 19:56:26+00:00): Done!
旧加卷 (2025-10-10 04:50:27+00:00): 将近70公里的山路啊？好体力
Kovoschiz (2025-11-12 07:19:49+00:00): This is not a `=basic_network` 
Please don't use brackets. `name=` is for proper names only, not descriptor labels That's a hint of mistake.  It should either be a `superroute` with `route=` inside, or a long `=nwn` concurrent with shorter  `=rwn` together.
Kovoschiz (2025-11-12 07:29:59+00:00): 2. `ref=` needs to be signposted confirmation and routing, and used for wayfinding. Please don't simply based on items of a numbered list.
Kovoschiz (2025-11-12 07:33:28+00:00): 3. Fundamentally, at least the different sections should be signposted, or otherwise officially delimited. It should not be merely different suggested tours on a guidebook. This is too soon to determine.
seewhyso (2025-11-13 07:44:10+00:00): Please see the official map for the trail at https://www.roundislandtrail.gov.hk/en/project-overview/project-background
Kovoschiz (2025-11-14 07:30:55+00:00): Yes of course, I have seen it. I'm exactly pointing out how it doesn't show a `ref=` for certain.
seewhyso (2025-11-18 02:17:30+00:00): I am referring to (3). As for the use of key:ref, I don't see any requirements that limit its use to those with signpost but I won't object to removing them if you consider it to be most suitable
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2026-04-13 21:00:30+00:00): Merhaba. Eklediğiniz yerler zaten OpenStreetMap'te mevcutmuş. Aynı yerleri ikinci kez eklemişsiniz. Bu nedenle değişikliğinizi geri aldım. http://openstreetmap.org/changeset/181295355

Etnografya Müzesi: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/287702175/
Konya Arkeoloji Müzesi: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/366780475/
Aziz Pavlus Katolik Kilisesi: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/204331667/
Sahib-i Ata Müzesi: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/287702168

Bir yer yalnızca bir öğe olarak eklenmeli. İlgili ilkenin Viki açıklaması için bkz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element

Eğer bunları ikinci kez ekleme nedeniniz, eklediğiniz yerleri  OSM Carto'da belirginleştirmek ise bu da yanlış. Bkz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_map_for_the_renderer

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Don%27t_tag_for_the_renderer

İyi günler.
eggie (2025-10-08 11:03:48+00:00): Dag Henrique, Betekent dit ook dat de panden geen adres meer hebben?
Die heb je nu ook verwijderd.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-10-08 11:29:53+00:00): Adresnodes hersteld
FroschForscher (2025-10-18 08:29:10+00:00): Hallo no_sch,
du hast hier an der Edisonalle (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/121832371/history/20) `cycleway:both=separate` gesetzt. Auf den parallel verlaufenden Bürgersteigen ist jedoch kein bicycle=designated gesetzt.
War das ein Fehler oder sind das wirklich Radwege?

Grüße FroschForscher
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2026-04-13 21:20:30+00:00): Merhaba. Eklediğiniz yerler zaten OpenStreetMap'te mevcutmuş. Aynı yerleri ikinci kez eklemişsiniz. Bu nedenle değişikliğinizi geri aldım. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181295921

Şems-i Tebrizi Camisi: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/289888812
Mevlana Müzesi: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13763858
Atatürk Müze Evi: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/290648759

Bir yer yalnızca bir öğe olarak eklenmeli. İlgili ilkenin Viki açıklaması için bkz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element

Eğer bunları ikinci kez ekleme nedeniniz OSM Carto'da, eklediğiniz yerleri belirgin hâle getirmek ise bu da yanlış. Bkz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_map_for_the_renderer

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Don%27t_tag_for_the_renderer

İyi günler.