piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-08-24 14:32:01+00:00): In Quebec, sidewalks are forbidden to cyclists by law.  Adding bicycel=permissive would be reverted because of this. There is a discussion to convert all of the Quebec sidewalks into bicycle=dismount, but it is still waiting for a consensus: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/should-we-use-bicycle-dismount-on-all-sidewalks-in-quebec/133126/5

In the meantime, we add cycleway links (cycleway=link is exactly for this purpose: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cycleway%3Dlink). Otherwise, bicycle routing cannot reach the mddle of the park, which may be not precise enough for some people. (Please note that before using cycleway=link, we used standard unmarked crossing, but these will be converted soon). Thanks and have a nice day!
felipeeugenio (2025-08-23 17:22:19+00:00): Note	Contributor	Tmstmp UTC	Action	Comment
4925773 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-08-23 19:20	closed	ok
4925780 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-08-23 19:20	closed	ok
4925775 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-08-23 19:20	closed	ok
4925782 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-08-23 19:20	closed	ok
4925777 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-08-23 19:19	closed	ok
4925784 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-08-23 19:19	closed	ok
4925772 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-08-23 19:19	closed	ok
4925779 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-08-23 19:19	closed	ok
4925774 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-08-23 19:19	closed	ok
4925781 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-08-23 19:19	closed	ok
4925783 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-08-23 19:19	closed	ok
4925771 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-08-23 19:19	closed	ok
4925778 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-08-23 19:19	closed	ok
lankapuhelin (2025-09-04 14:04:14+00:00): Hei, millä perusteella osalle trackeista on asetettu access=private?
lankapuhelin (2025-09-07 16:56:32+00:00): Näkemäni valokuvan mukaan paikalla on C2+"ajo luvanvaraista" lisäkilpi. Vaihdettu access=private arvoon motor_vehicle=permit
felipeeugenio (2025-08-23 17:27:40+00:00): Note	Contributor	Tmstmp UTC	Action	Comment
4925787 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-08-23 19:24	closed	ok
4925788 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-08-23 19:24	closed	ok
4925789 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-08-23 19:24	closed	ok
4925791 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-08-23 19:24	closed	ok
4925786 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-08-23 19:24	closed	ok..
eggie (2025-08-23 21:13:34+00:00): Dag Loed   Dit is niet helemaal gelukt.
Allerlei vlakken liggen hier over elkaar heen. 
Lijnen kruisen elkaar. Wegdelen liggen los. 
Ook lijkt het me niet verstandig om name-Dassenburcht toe te voegen aan de kaart.
Ik overweeg je changeset terug te draaien.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-08-23 21:20:14+00:00): reverted by changeset #170900385

De rest pas ik even met de hand aan.

Alle begin is moeilijk.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-08-23 21:32:42+00:00): Losse eindje weer verbonden. Dassenburcht is geen geografische naam en kan denk ik ook beter niet op de kaart. Dat triggert wellicht ongewenste activiteiten. 
Vlak bos laten aansluiten.
lollybyte (2025-08-23 18:17:03+00:00): Hallo kintetsu, du hast u.a. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1000778328 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1085120697 gelöscht. Ist das Gebäude und die Brachfläche verschwunden? Auf den Luftbildern, die du in Deinen Quellen angegeben hast, sind die Objekte noch vorhanden.
kintetsu (2025-08-24 12:26:13+00:00): Ja, sorry, da war ich zu voreilig. Ich werde das mal korrigieren
lollybyte (2025-08-24 12:44:12+00:00): Hallo kintetsu, danke für deine Rückmeldung. Da ich noch einige weitere Änderungen für diskussionswürdig halte, habe ich mal eine Thread im Forum erstellt:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/useredits-mit-aus-meiner-sicht-deutlichen-qualitatsmangeln/134736
rempshaener (2025-08-23 20:40:10+00:00): Hallo,
auch hier: keine Anmerkungen.
Viele Grüße
eggie (2025-08-24 17:52:53+00:00): Je edits...https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=170893757

Staat er een bord Woonerf?  Dan is de maxspeed 15 km/u
Meestal mappen we wegen op een parkeerplaats als highway=service service=parking_aisle.
De parkeermogelijkheid zelf kun je op het vlak ook nog aangeven met amenity=parking access=???  private?? 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-08-24 17:58:17+00:00): Ik denk ook niet dat er een doorgaande weg is en je er bij de van de Waalstraat weer uit kunt rijden.
Dat is gewoon een highway=footway

En al die accesstags met =no lijken me niet nodig. Stel dat ik daar iets moet bezorgen?
eggie (2025-08-24 18:30:12+00:00): René is heb die woonerven verwijderd en er toegangfswegen voor parkeerplaatsen van gemaakt.
access=private toegevoegd aan de parking zelf.
Groet
eggie
René Stout (2025-08-25 07:45:48+00:00): Hallo Eggie,
Dank.
Ik vind het nogal gecompliceerd. Fijn dat het zo hebt opgelost.
Groet,
René
eggie (2025-08-25 07:50:08+00:00): No problem....   
Laat je niet weerhouden door wat kritiek.
Mapse
eggie
eggie (2025-08-24 18:18:03+00:00): local knowledge;survey?

Daar is toch geen woonerf. Dat is gewoon een voetpad. Denk dat al die accesstags er ook niet horen.

Groet
eggie
eggie (2025-08-24 18:29:01+00:00): Het is nu aangepast naar voetpad.
René Stout (2025-08-25 07:50:39+00:00): Hallo Eggie,
Dank je wel.
Ik ben helemaal nog niet thuis in de vele mogelijkheden van benoemen.
Maar goed dat ik gevraagd heb om controle ;-).
Groet,
René
René Stout (2025-08-25 07:52:14+00:00): Hallo Eggie,
Dank je wel.
Ik ben helemaal nog niet thuis in de vele mogelijkheden van benoemen.
Maar goed dat ik gevraagd heb om controle ;-).
Groet,
René
Gregory Peony (2025-08-23 23:20:15+00:00): Hi Rabina, the footprints you mapped here all represent buildings and are appropriately squared, however many of them could be more accurate for one reason or another. 

It looks like you do not understand how to account for off-nadir imagery i.e. imagery taken at an angle, when mapping. Consider the Tower of Pisa, when mapping footprints from imagery like this the roof can be used to obtain the building's shape, then it should be moved to the base of the building so that they are accurately positioned. In this case the Southern and Western walls of buildings can be seen and the shadows are cast North so you can sometimes see where the shadow originates at the base of the Western corners of buildings. Sometimes you included the wall in the size of the footprints leading to them being oversized. This [video about mapping dense urban areas](https://youtu.be/JAPiGntG6fs) has more information and a guide.

I think you generally map building footpritns oversized. 

When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom in so that you can see the outline of the building and mark the corners carefully. Exclude shadows and yards when tracing the footprint.  Keep in mind that you are looking at the roofs of buildings, but mapping their footprints. Depending on how the scene is lit, pitched roofs may have light and dark sections that belong to one building. Generally pitched roofs overhang the walls of a building, so a footprint slightly smaller than the roof is accurate. You can scale selected features in ID with shift+(-/+), or JOSM with ctrl.+alt+Lclick & drag.  Take care to make contributions that others can build upon.

You mapped some more complex buildings as simple rectangles. Do you know how to use the extrude tool or draw complex buildings in JOSM?

Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
Gregory Peony (2025-08-23 23:24:26+00:00): Oh and take care when mapping with off-nadir imagery and the base of a building is obscured. You may need to reference another imagery source, or estimate the position by moving several footprints simultaneously. I hope this helps.
Rabina Poudyal (2025-08-24 16:59:09+00:00): Thankyou so much for your correction!! I will take care of this while mapping from now
Gregory Peony (2025-08-29 02:52:14+00:00): Awesome! You're most welcome! I corrected the postion of one of the footprints you added here. You can check the following link to see various changesets I uploaded where I mentioned nadir in the comment for examples of how I mapped using off-nadir imagery. Beware of the imagery that was used for the mapping. Sometimes offsets may have been applied which; in cases like this you're unlikely to immediately see the footprints in the correct position just by loading the imagery. https://osmcha.org/changesets/170897311?filters=%7B%22uids%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%2216598557%22%2C%22value%22%3A%2216598557%22%7D%5D%2C%22date__gte%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%22%22%2C%22value%22%3A%22%22%7D%5D%2C%22comment%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%22nadir%22%2C%22value%22%3A%22nadir%22%7D%5D%7D
Comino (2025-08-23 20:15:09+00:00): Hi,

In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes".

Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag !
Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead.

For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Merchants#tagging-guidance
and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bitcoin

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
IT entrepreneur and Bitcoin enthusiast
https://btcmap.org/tagger/6794624
UT93 (2025-09-12 07:03:08+00:00): Könnte es sein, dass du dich da in der angegebenen Postleitzahl etwas vertippt hast?
Saaste (2025-09-12 07:41:46+00:00): You are correct. Thanks for pointing that out. I'll fix it!
Saaste (2025-09-12 08:13:15+00:00): It is now fixed!
swaree (2025-09-26 15:41:04+00:00): En cas que aquest changeset haja creat elements duplicats, s'hauria de moure el ja existent damunt del nou, per preservar les coordenades. El nom, si hi ha, és l'oficial del catàleg; altres noms poden anar en loc_name=* o alt_name=*. Les etiquetes de les mesures estan actualitzades i especifiquen les unitats, és preferible mantindre les noves.

//

En caso de que este changeset haya creado elementos duplicados, se debería mover el nodo ya existente sobre el nuevo, para preservar las coordenadas. El nombre, si lo hubiese, es el oficial del catálogo; otros nombres pueden ir en loc_name=* o alt_name=*. Las etiquetas de las medidas están actualizadas y especifican las unidades, es preferible mantener las nuevas.
HerryCFPL (2026-03-19 14:11:17+00:00): 您好，中国大陆为什么要使用繁体字（正体字）？
Komadinovic Vanja (2026-01-30 23:15:50+00:00): Hi,

Looks like you accidentally  deleted https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14185390 which is valid PSS trail https://pss.rs/terenipp/e7-16/ ?

Also it's a good practice to write summary in changeset and try to respond to question "why you did something".
Boogier (2026-02-07 14:21:28+00:00): Hi, probably the relation was deleted by mistake. Sorry. I don't think I deleted it intentionally. Usually I only correct roads and objects.
Komadinovic Vanja (2026-02-11 20:48:59+00:00): Thanks for checking. Could you please revert relation ( or recreate it ) it looks like your changeset had other changes and I would not like to accidentally remove them with revert?
Maruh24 (2025-08-23 20:08:43+00:00): some data of bus stops name of this 2 routes (intercity) in the old "Tay Ninh city" area you guys can also search them in smart Tay Ninh web https://smart.tayninh.gov.vn/tuyenxebus/bando
CONTAN (2025-08-24 18:28:07+00:00): Salut,potiraspunde la mesajul meu te rog?
bikepiper (2026-03-08 10:24:18+00:00): Danke fürs Ausbessern auf "sett"! War gestern dort und hab mich (a) gewundert dass dort Kopfsteinpflaster ist, (b) gefreut dass es in osm ist, und (c) noch mehr gewundert dass ich es selber falsch eingetragen hatte.
corfede (2025-08-24 05:02:12+00:00): Here you've deleted some retaining walls (why?) and moved some buildings imported from the regional technical map, which are correctly positioned (but out of alignment on some orthophotos like Bing). Those buildings shouldn't be moved.
Geim (2025-08-27 08:14:33+00:00): Er staan nu 2 geldautomaten op de kaart, welke kan weg?
emvee (2025-08-27 18:07:16+00:00): Bedankt voor het meekijken, die op de adres node kan weg en dat heb ik inmiddels gedaan.
Mannivu (2025-08-24 12:46:38+00:00): Ciao, quando usi Vespucci sarebbe opportuno che indicassi quali modifiche hai fatto prima di caricarle, in modo da aiutare altri utenti a capire cosa hai modificato e cosa volevi modificare (è utile in caso di modiche strane per capire se l'utente ha fatto un errore perché non sa come mappare o per una distrazione ha toccato qualche elemento senza volerlo). A differenza di altri strumenti, non è come StreetComplete, che Jo visto utilizzi, Vespucci non indica automaticamente cosa è stato modificato nell'oggetto del gruppo di modifiche, ma deve essere fatto manualmente dall'utente. Vedi https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments e per maggiori informazioni e buona mappatura!
Paolitosss (2025-08-24 18:10:30+00:00): Ah ok scusami, sinceramente su Vespucci non ci ho mai fatto caso al commento dei changeset, su id di solito qualcosa scrivo, scriveró anche qui. Grazie per l'info!
Mannivu (2025-08-24 19:44:35+00:00): Penso che iD non dia la possibilità di salvare le modifiche senza commento, Vespucci sì (purtroppo). Grazie a te!
Tesupersnake (2025-08-23 19:28:19+00:00): Дорога только либо для жестких внедорожников, либо для велосипедов горных. Когда я ехал, там было много луж и немало упавших деревьев
M!dgard (2025-08-23 19:36:48+00:00): Before: https://viewer.geovisio.fr/viewer.html?focus=pic&pic=decd2fd7-a6e6-4710-9fb0-2eb58a0b79c4&xyz=185.73/0.02/80

Now: https://viewer.geovisio.fr/viewer.html?focus=pic&pic=dccaae07-69da-420a-962c-55f390810353&xyz=330.91/-8.72/31
cronoser (2026-03-13 00:24:34+00:00): corregidas etiquetas
Mevess (2025-09-14 10:43:38+00:00): Annulé dans 171910392
Frans S (2025-08-24 09:02:52+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
As far I can see, you adjusted (squared?) and mapped buildings.
Since the Imagery is very clear, you can see both the roof and the walls of buildings.
In those cases, similar as highrise buildings, the mapped rooflines ought to be moved to the footprint of that building.


See this video.
https://youtu.be/dsfUcslLtVc?si=bEHwRl1sxDI_GA0H
Please take that in consideration on next mappings
Best regards
Sylabowy Kot (2025-08-25 09:38:26+00:00): "no comment"? More like "no more edits" if you don't want to say what you've changed.

Please read this: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
corfede (2025-08-24 04:54:14+00:00): Good morning, I'd like to point out that I think it's a mistake to remove the detailed residential polygons and replace them with a huge residential polygon covering schools and everything else. You've also removed benches that I know are still there. You've attached pedestrian area polygons to streets and removed internal connections. Furthermore, you've changed many streets in the historic center from residential to living_street, a controversial tag in Italy and rarely used, if not discouraged. Thank you for any clarification you can provide and for any restoration of the existing mapping. Thanks, Federico.
Gregory Peony (2025-08-24 00:01:02+00:00): You mapped a valid footprint, with an accurate shape, that has been appropriately squared and moved in the direction of its base to account for off-nadir imagery. A clear improvement. Thank you very much for taking my feedback onboard.

A couple of small points of refinement; The footprint could have been a touch smaller to account for the roof overhanging the walls, and the footprint could have been moved slightly more SW becasue it appears to not be positioned quite at the base. In this case the vegetation at the SW corner of this building obscures a portion of the building and its shadow. I made the modifications and uploaded it here so you can visualise it https://osmcha.org/changesets/170903420 

Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170898300
aceman444 (2025-09-16 17:58:23+00:00): Hi, the motorway you are touching here is not yet visible on Ortofotomozaika SR imagery so how do you know your changes are better than previous state? What is your real source?
Gregory Peony (2025-08-24 01:33:04+00:00): You made good use of a secondary imagery source. Just remember to align to the primary source, GPS traces, or existing data depending on the context. The footprint here looks accurate. It could be slightly wider but that's a minor point. It also looks like you were accounting for the roof overhang which is good. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170898450
aceman444 (2025-09-16 18:02:04+00:00): We map roads and lanes according to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lanes#Examples , so that movement of turn lanes (rightgoing branch) at junction of roads R4 and 19 is wrong.
Gregory Peony (2025-08-24 02:43:43+00:00): Somewhat of a mixed bag here. Overall the sizes of buildings are accurate and off-nadir is being accounted for, but there's definitely some room for improvement. For example a few footprints should be more complex than rectangles and the SE footprints have been moved to include parts of paths (which are a similar colour to the walls). Consider the highways in imagery and how people are moving and accessing areas. The more complex footprints can help map users identify which building they're looking at.

Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170898572
MikeKoza (2026-01-31 17:26:34+00:00): Hello,
Is there any justification for the current location of the city-centre node?
Before the change it was located on very specific landmark - old Prussian zero milestone (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Berlin_Mitte_Preussischer_Ganzmeilenstein,_Null-Meilenstein-03.jpg), which previously marked beginning of local coordinate system. Current location looks just like an arbitrary point in the middle of the street.
TrickyFoxy (2025-08-24 13:04:20+00:00): https://osm.org/way/1259262119

Если ресторан закрыт, то не нужно отмечать его как amenity=restaurant, иначе он считается рестораном со странным именем Заброшенный ресторан.
Nyukusai (2025-08-24 13:06:45+00:00): Спасибо TrickyFoxy, буду знать.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-08-23 21:10:54+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1424472223

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
ukinimod (2025-08-24 09:14:48+00:00): Dziękuję za powiadomienie, zmieniłem na addr:place.
Pozdrawiam!
VLD549 (2025-09-10 14:38:21+00:00): Hi, I was asked to verify name changes. According to Onze taal, it should be IJzer, both i and j capitalized.
I believe here in OSM it should be according to those rules.
See: https://onzetaal.nl/taalloket/ijsland-ijsland

Could you elaborate? Thanks.
VLD549 (2025-10-05 07:34:06+00:00): Hi, could you or someone else respond please? Thank you.
LeuvenNeedsTrams2 (2025-12-04 19:42:22+00:00): Sorry, I just found out today that you don't get notified if someone comments on your changeset. Just stumbled upon this in my history.

Taaladvies Vlaanderen does indeed state that ij at the start of a word that should be capitalised should indeed both have the i and j capitalised. Somewhat obscure or maybe even antequated spelling rule, seems like, as I don't ever remember learning this and even the official local government-issued map spells it wrong: https://www.rotselaar.be/sites/default/files/Trage_Wegenkaart_2024.pdf

I'll correct it now on the map. Thanks for the feedback!
LeuvenNeedsTrams2 (2025-12-04 19:48:09+00:00): Corrected in 175515211
NorthCrab_upload (2025-08-23 21:40:58+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13093153799

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Barroszt (2025-08-24 20:28:29+00:00): naprawione
custodiankeyy (2025-08-24 11:25:34+00:00): locality, quarter ve suburb etiketlerine sahip olan elementler resmi kaynaklarda gözükmemekte. Bunların doğru olduğuna emin misiniz?
Aleksandar Matejevic (2025-08-25 10:34:26+00:00): Hi Abdhmir, 
I see that you have removed admin_level=6 relation and created new with admin_level=5 value. Can you also add admin_level=6 relations for this area?
oko2708 (2025-08-23 22:18:10+00:00): Is het de bedoeling dat ik de way achter dit hek vervolgens ook markeer als private of is dit implied omdat de gate zelf al private is?
eggie (2025-08-24 06:51:30+00:00): Dag oko,

Ik heb even met Obliek foto's van Slagboom&Peeters gekeken.
Het zal geen officieel wandelpad (footway) zijn.
Ik heb het aangepast naar highway=track  Het eerste stuk net voorbij het hek.
Dan wordt het een soort tegelpad om bij die ligplaatsen te komen. De rest is dan een onduidelijk schapenpad met gras tot aan de volgende afrastering.
Ik heb het aangepast en achter het hek staat nu op slot met access=private.

Dat stuk naar het oosten vanaf de oprit naar 99 is volgens mij ook een track en geen voetpad.
Maar dat is Up to you.

Groet
eggie
oko2708 (2025-08-24 08:05:19+00:00): Dankjewel! Bij de parkeerplaats staan twee kleine paaltjes met daarop een G7 en C14 bord, dus volgensmij moet het dan een voetpad blijven.
eggie (2025-08-24 08:13:23+00:00): 👍

Oke duidelijker kan niet
VictorIE (2026-03-31 16:28:37+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13093177698/

Should this be barrier=bollard?
b-unicycling (2026-04-02 22:39:44+00:00): No, it was supposed to be "man_made=planter" as seen on Bing. I've corrected it now.
VictorIE (2026-04-03 00:13:42+00:00): I think I was looking at the wrong corner. :D
kabelhaai (2025-12-01 02:40:07+00:00): FYI cycleway=opposite has been deprecated in favour of oneway:bicycle, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cycleway=opposite?uselang=en
MarkusHD (2025-12-01 22:38:51+00:00): Thanks for the hint. I guess the last time I had a look into the Wiki, it was still recommended to use both tags.
oko2708 (2025-08-23 22:16:11+00:00): Ik twijfel of ik dit pad weg moet halen. Ik ben hier geweest en er is geen enkel teken van een pad. Dit is gewoon een grasveld. Maar er staat wel een bankje en een prullenbak, wat suggereert dat dit mogelijk wel als pad bedoeld is geweest.
eggie (2025-08-24 07:01:01+00:00): Ik zie ook geen duidelijk pad...  
Wanneer er veel gewandeld wordt dan ontstaan soms vanzelf paden. Een grijs gebied. 

Soms lopen ergens wandelrouterelaties  en dan is het wel zaak om die looproute als highway=path met informal=yes  te laten staan. Dat is hier niet het geval. 
Er zal wel eens een trekker naar het hek rijden. 
De voorgaande mapper was Peter Elderson die de wandelroutes coördineert. 
Je kunt het dus altijd overleggen met de voorgaande mapper dan weet je het zeker. 
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=170901707
Mapse
eggie
Metzor (2025-08-25 18:04:12+00:00): Hi NVBW_Edit_7,
Danke fürs Aufräumen! DOP als Quelle ist schon was feines. Hoffe, es war nicht zu viel Mist drin, den ich auf Basis von Smartphone-Gps eingetragen habe...
Viele Grüße
Metzor
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170902087