piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
rskedgell (2025-09-14 08:21:52+00:00): (Review requested)

The outline of the path looks fine, as it's from your own GPX file.

However you probably don't need to add an access=no tag here. If horses and bicycles are prohibited and it's pedestrian only, you could additionally tag it with horse=no and bicycle=no. Alternatively, you could replace highway=path with highway=footway and dispense with the access tags entirely. (NB This is just my opinion, what you have mapped isn't wrong and won't cause any problems for data consumers and you don't need to change anything.)

You might find the following useful
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpath
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#United_Kingdom
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Access_provisions_in_the_United_Kingdom
Gregory Peony (2025-09-14 02:27:33+00:00): Hello, you have generally identified buildings in the imagery and mapped them quite accurately. They'd be even more accurate if you map the footprint slightly smaller than the roof you see. You created some invalid shared nodes between buildings and residential areas: hold alt to prevent your cursor from snapping to existing data. If you want to map a round feature, then right click it and circularise it, or use the short cut o. 

The following are more comprehensive comments regarding the previous points;

Please do not connect the corners of buildings to other buildings or features such as highways or residential areas. In the iD Editor, hold down the `Alt` key to prevent your cursor from snapping to existing data and accidentally creating shared(grey) nodes. This [video about connected nodes](https://youtu.be/ltn1VOiq5_0) has more information and a guide.

After tracing and tagging features which are likely square or round, please remember to square their corners (q), or circularise them (o), because it is almost impossible and time consuming to draw shapes so percisely by hand. Buildings with metal or pitched roofs tend to have square corners; round buildings are identifiable by the distinctive cresent shaped shadow they cast. Unless the building is clearly a different shape then it's best to assume that it should be rounded or its corners should be squared. In the iD Editor, you can right click for access to editing functions. Since roofs tend to overhang walls trace the initial shape slightly smaller to allow a buffer for any change in size that may occur. In JOSM use the [buildingstools plugin](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/BuildingsTools). In ID you must draw the shape accurately enough else shapes will not completely square. This [video about squaring features in ID](https://youtu.be/Xs5wX592E1o) has more information and a demo.

Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
gscholz (2025-11-03 09:10:39+00:00): Hi KORAYREİS,
your recent activities have create a lot of errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=29.09898&lat=40.32993&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges

Can you please fix this? As you may know, this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps.

You may also like to educate yourself about how to edit bus routes properly:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Buses

Kind regards
Guido
nevw (2025-09-13 22:56:21+00:00): I reverted this as the suburbs are already mapped by area boundaries.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-09-14 02:12:33+00:00): Hello Kushii. Please don't map fantasy features in OSM. Thanks. Graeme Fitzpatrick, Moderator, OSMF Data Working Group.
burrscurr (2025-09-13 21:39:45+00:00): Korrektur zur Quelle: eigentlich Luftbild + lokales Wissen
BrianMoos (2025-09-22 11:54:02+00:00): På samme byggeplads bygger Boligforeningen Århus Omegn deres afdeling 27. Kolt Østerparken.
Hvordan noterer vi flere "operators" ?
Lostmonkey (2025-09-22 12:21:05+00:00): Måske bare adskilt af et ";" ?
user_5359 (2025-09-14 11:58:55+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/666445478, http://www.osm.org/way/209685762. What is the mean of the tag smoo = farm_auxiliary ?
Eebie (2025-09-14 21:35:56+00:00): It is corrected
NorthCrab_upload (2025-09-13 22:11:03+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10563082958

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Sammyhawkrad (2025-09-14 08:29:11+00:00): Hello FACUOS, the building here was already well mapped, and there was no need to delete it and replace it with what you mapped. Your changes have been reversed as a result. 

Best,
Sam
FACUOS (2025-09-15 08:40:50+00:00): Please okay I have hear.
greyim (2025-09-14 01:32:42+00:00): doesnt show up on rendering?
frydzio (2025-09-14 10:13:01+00:00): Nie wiem czy taka nazwa jest poprawna. Wprawdzie wszyscy mówią, że chodzą do Pijarów, ale tak samo licealiści chodzą do Staszica, Batorego, Czackiego, itp. a jednak tych nazw nie używamy jako alt_name. Ja bym użył czegoś w rodzaju "Szkoła Podstawowa Pijarów"
Sylabowy Kot (2025-09-16 06:52:58+00:00): No trochę niezbyt te porównanie znaczy to samo, bo nie kojarzę, by na takich szkołach podawali gdzieś nazwisko patrona pojedynczo w jasno widocznym miejscu. Ale może bardziej by pasowało użycie loc_name?

Zakładam, że widziałeś ten napis na nowodobudowanym skrzydle budynku. Mi chodziło po prostu o to, by dało się wyszukać w OSM obiekt po takim skrócie. Po prostu niektórym szkołom brakuje takich krótszych nazw, tagów i ludzie przez to muszą wystukiwać pełną nazwę szkoły lub adres, by np. Nominatim załapał. Musimy w OSM pokazywać, że system umie wykazać, że jakiś skrót faktycznie może podpowiedzieć konkretne szkoły.
eggie (2025-09-14 07:42:07+00:00): Dag Karel... Netjes ingetekend. Ik heb De accesstags voor een bromfietspad NL:G12a toegevoegd conform het verder verloop van het fietspad.
Mocht het geen G12a fietspad zijn laat het dan even weten.
G11: mofa=yes, moped=no, traffic_sign=NL:G11
G12a: moped=designated, mofa=designated, traffic_sign=NL:G12a
G13: moped=no, mofa=no, traffic_sign=NL:G13

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Cycleway
MVG
eggie
martinst (2025-09-14 06:29:21+00:00): Korrekt wäre hier wohl: disused:highway=path
wolframfriele (2025-09-15 07:30:41+00:00): Thank you, I changed it!
NeisBot (2025-09-13 23:36:53+00:00): Hi savant1821, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Added cemetery landuse designation and adjusted surrounding features"
Gregory Peony (2025-09-14 01:38:22+00:00): Welcome to OSM! All footprints you added here represent buildings in the imagery but they should be squared and sometimes you only used one half of the roof to map them. Condider the roof shape and how the scene is lit. See how I mapped the northern group in https://osmcha.org/changesets/171898065

When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom in so that you can see the outline of the building and mark the corners carefully. Exclude shadows and yards when tracing the footprint. Keep in mind that you are looking at the [roofs of buildings](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape#Roof_shape), but mapping their footprints. Depending on how the scene is lit, pitched roofs may have light and dark sections that belong to one building. Generally pitched roofs overhang the walls of a building, so a footprint slightly smaller than the roof is accurate. You can scale selected features in ID with shift+(-/+), or JOSM with ctrl.+alt+Lclick & drag.  Take care to make contributions that others can build upon.

After tracing and tagging features which are likely square or round, please remember to square their corners (q), or circularise them (o), because it is almost impossible and time consuming to draw shapes so percisely by hand. Buildings with metal or pitched roofs tend to have square corners; round buildings are identifiable by the distinctive cresent shaped shadow they cast. Unless the building is clearly a different shape then it's best to assume that it should be rounded or its corners should be squared. In the iD Editor, you can right click for access to editing functions. Since roofs tend to overhang walls trace the initial shape slightly smaller to allow a buffer for any change in size that may occur. In JOSM use the [buildingstools plugin](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/BuildingsTools). In ID you must draw the shape accurately enough else shapes will not completely square. This [video about squaring features in ID](https://youtu.be/Xs5wX592E1o) has more information and a demo.

Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
citrula (2025-09-14 01:22:47+00:00): If the building is still present you should remove the store information but keep the building outline.
cardboardBox (2025-09-14 01:58:22+00:00): I thought it was being knocked down but whoops, just renovated. I put it back.
Gregory Peony (2025-09-14 01:49:00+00:00): Welcome to OSM! The footprint you added here represents a building in the imagery, well spotted! I think this building is actually square becasue the shadow it casts is straight. See how I mapped it in https://osmcha.org/changesets/171898153

If you want to map a round feature press o, (or right click and select the relevant function) after tagging it to circularise it.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171897448
Gregory Peony (2025-09-14 01:43:31+00:00): Welcome to OSM! The footprint you added here represents a building in the imagery, well spotted! It is however oversized and should be squared. See how I mapped it in https://osmcha.org/changesets/171898110

When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom in so that you can see the outline of the building and mark the corners carefully. Exclude shadows and yards when tracing the footprint. Keep in mind that you are looking at the [roofs of buildings](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape#Roof_shape), but mapping their footprints. Depending on how the scene is lit, pitched roofs may have light and dark sections that belong to one building. Generally pitched roofs overhang the walls of a building, so a footprint slightly smaller than the roof is accurate. You can scale selected features in ID with shift+(-/+), or JOSM with ctrl.+alt+Lclick & drag.  Take care to make contributions that others can build upon.

After tracing and tagging features which are likely square or round, please remember to square their corners (q), or circularise them (o), because it is almost impossible and time consuming to draw shapes so percisely by hand. Buildings with metal or pitched roofs tend to have square corners; round buildings are identifiable by the distinctive cresent shaped shadow they cast. Unless the building is clearly a different shape then it's best to assume that it should be rounded or its corners should be squared. In the iD Editor, you can right click for access to editing functions. Since roofs tend to overhang walls trace the initial shape slightly smaller to allow a buffer for any change in size that may occur. In JOSM use the [buildingstools plugin](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/BuildingsTools). In ID you must draw the shape accurately enough else shapes will not completely square. This [video about squaring features in ID](https://youtu.be/Xs5wX592E1o) has more information and a demo.

Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
Gregory Peony (2025-09-14 02:41:26+00:00): Hi, when mapping square features please right click and select square, or press q after tagging to square the corners of features. I resolved this in Changeset: 171898709

Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171898499
MaliMrav (2025-09-15 07:05:29+00:00): Vidim da si označio Dr. Max kao prodavnicu kućne hemije (drogerija):

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13141856190

Koliko znam, Dr. Max su uglavnom apoteke, za razliku od npr. Lilly ili DM prodavnica koje su drogerije, ali moguće da grešim. Ako ova konkretna prodavnica jeste apoteka, onda bi pravilnije bilo da se označi tako, a ne kao drogerija.
brdrsrsu (2025-09-15 10:42:25+00:00): Супер др Макс је дрогерија (они пишу Dr.Max спојено и великим), разлика је у том "супер" у имену. Ова код нас је чиста дрогерија, са апотеком у ћошку иза стакла – исто како раде у Лили дрогеријама. Могу усликати и послати ако треба, али детерџенти, шампони, козметика, одећа, храна... одељак који је апотека је иза стакла. Вероватно треба физички посетити те остале "Супер др Макс" по Београду (са "супер" у имену) и проверити да нису и они заправо дрогерије.
MaliMrav (2025-09-15 22:01:34+00:00): Ok, hvala na pojašnjenju.
Gregory Peony (2025-09-14 03:01:12+00:00): Why did you delete these footprints? I mapped these footprints to show you how they would look when acurately mapped. Features should not be deleted unless you have reason to believe that they do not represent things that currently exist. You should modify features you can identify if you think they are not accurate as this preserves their history. Resolved by Changeset: 171898908
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171898656
nvh12 (2025-09-15 02:37:21+00:00): Sorry, my mistake.
Gregory Peony (2025-09-17 03:57:13+00:00): I forgive you😉 I've made mistakes when contributing and will continue to do so; it's impossible not to.

I had a look at your more recent contributions and the building footprint accuracy is greatly improved; thank you very much for applying the feedback and improving your mapping!

All's good, I restored the original footprints to the database. I was just curious as to your rationale, so I could consider it when providing feedback.
Gregory Peony (2025-09-14 04:05:21+00:00): Hi, all but one footprint you mapped represent a building; I think the round building represents a tree.

Generally the footpritns here are accurate and it looks like you took care when mapping them, please try to exclude the shadow a building casts from its footprint size. Mapping the footprint slightly smaller than pitched roofs you see in imagery can help with this, and accounts for the likely overhang of the roof. 

On a few occasions it looks like you mapped only one half of a pitched roof i.e. only the dark or light side. Consider the roof shape, how the scene is lit and the shadow a building casts (e.g. its length) to aid your interpretation. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape#Roof_shape 

I flagged the footpritns for reference in OSMCha.

Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
Gregory Peony (2025-09-14 05:21:28+00:00): See how I mapped the footpritns here in https://osmcha.org/changesets/171900733
manjita pandey (2026-07-28 05:56:19+00:00): Thank you. This is very helpful and I will notice and update my mapping based on the feedbacks above
残阳逐流 (2025-09-23 12:43:23+00:00): 你把101省道石船以南的路段全删了干什么？
残阳逐流 (2025-09-23 12:44:05+00:00): 里程碑上路牌上都有明确的标注，你删掉到底想干什么？
残阳逐流 (2025-09-23 12:49:54+00:00): 望江路、郭鱼路、福宏大道、长安大道、渝江大道沿线经个人实地探访，全部都有明确的S101里程碑。你这样改图的实际依据在哪里？
MoistTangerine2 (2025-09-23 12:53:36+00:00): According to the Planning of the Ordinary Provincial Highway Network in Chongqing Municipality (2025-2035), Provincial Highway S101 starts from Shichuan Town.
根据《重庆市普通省道公路网规划（2025—2035年）》，S101省道起点为石船镇。
https://jtj.cq.gov.cn/igixmj/gkyjzj/202508/tOpinion_6811.html
mweper (2025-09-14 15:01:59+00:00): Hola. Al ser doble sentido de circulación, se debería añadir "oneway=no" para dejar en claro que esta vía ya se relevó, además de cumplir con el estandarizado local. Ya lo corregí.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Argentina/Etiquetas#Buenas_pr%C3%A1cticas_de_edici%C3%B3n
greyim (2025-09-14 09:01:38+00:00): Thanks ;-)
OddlyAngled (2025-09-21 13:39:32+00:00): was the weighbridge tag added here intentional? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/996657748/history
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171899484
i2004 (2025-09-14 21:24:47+00:00): te hice toda la linea 178 en todos sus ramales sentido a provincia
i2004 (2025-09-15 00:28:20+00:00): por otro lado como sabes que ahora el 25 va por necochea azopardo hasta brasil?
AgusQui (2025-09-16 02:06:49+00:00): Porque lo ví cuando relevaba paradas del eBus, y después lo corroboré en la página del GCBA
Gregory Peony (2025-09-14 04:48:27+00:00): Hi, There's reason to believe that all footprints you've mapped here represent buildings, however they are generally oversized; please map the footprints slightly smaller than the pitched roofs you see in imagery. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171899921
Iceman1415 (2025-09-14 09:14:18+00:00): survey by neko14:
https://streetcomplete.app/p/288236.jpg
https://streetcomplete.app/p/304775.jpg
https://streetcomplete.app/p/304776.jpg
Gregory Peony (2025-09-14 05:20:30+00:00): Hi, you identified buildings in imagery but most footpritns you map are oversized.

When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom in so that you can see the outline of the building and mark the corners carefully. Exclude shadows and yards when tracing the footprint. Keep in mind that you are looking at the [roofs of buildings](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape#Roof_shape), but mapping their footprints. Depending on how the scene is lit, pitched roofs may have light and dark sections that belong to one building. Generally pitched roofs overhang the walls of a building, so a footprint slightly smaller than the roof is accurate. You can scale selected features in ID with shift+(-/+), or JOSM with ctrl.+alt+Lclick & drag.  Take care to make contributions that others can build upon.

I hope this helps.
rempshaener (2025-09-14 07:32:12+00:00): Hallo,
eine Frage interessehalber: Die Eingänge und das Löschen der Hausnummer 12 standen  nicht in der Note; was ist denn die Quelle?
Viele Grüße
Im Fokus (2025-09-14 13:55:52+00:00): Hallo rempshaener,

eigentlich hätte die Erklärung für Deine Frage in der Antwort auf die Frage von AndySchulte im Changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171766574#map=19/51.217746/6.770598&layers=N stehen sollen. Ich habe sie heute Morgen verfasst, aber anscheinend hat irgend etwas mit der Abspeicherung von mir unbemerkt nicht funktioniert (bei mir vermutlich). Ich werde meine Erläuterungen dort also noch einmal notieren und damit hoffentlich auch Deine Frage bezüglich Hausnr. 12 beantworten. Die Eingänge habe ich nach Luftbild hinzugefügt.
rempshaener (2025-09-14 17:55:10+00:00): Hallo,
nur ein kurzer Hinweis noch zu TIM-online: Das ist für uns nur nachrangig von Interesse; es zählt letztlich, was vor Ort ausgewiesen ist.
Danke und viele Grüße
Im Fokus (2025-09-16 02:38:03+00:00): Mit Verlaub, da muss ich widersprechen. In den meisten Fällen ist da gar nix ausgewiesen, die Hausnummer fehlt einfach. Und wenn da nur ein Zettel angeklebt ist, nehm ich dessen Inhalt auch nicht so ernst, denn nach dem nächsten Starkregen könnte der perdu sein oder im Hochsommer nach vier Wochen unleserlich.
Nur beim Rest an Diskrepanzen muss man näher hinschauen.
Kollegialen Gruß
rempshaener (2025-09-16 04:56:26+00:00): Hallo,
aus deinen Erläuterungen und Quellenangaben ging nicht hervor, dass du vor Ort warst. Nur dann ist es okay, bereits erfasste Hausnummern zu überarbeiten.
Viele Grüße
jack walker2 (2025-09-14 08:58:29+00:00): 👍
Gregory Peony (2025-09-14 06:25:17+00:00): Hi, the buildings you added here are generally valid but oversized. This led to issues where some footprints overlapped other unmapped buildings visible in the imagery. Unless you're sure that a building shares a wall with another it's best to map them seperately.

When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom in so that you can see the outline of the building and mark the corners carefully. Exclude shadows and yards when tracing the footprint. Keep in mind that you are looking at the [roofs of buildings](osm.wiki/Key:roof:shape#Roof_shape), but mapping their footprints. Depending on how the scene is lit, pitched roofs may have light and dark sections that belong to one building. Generally pitched roofs overhang the walls of a building, so a footprint slightly smaller than the roof is accurate. You can scale selected features in ID with shift+(-/+), or JOSM with ctrl.+alt+Lclick & drag. Take care to make contributions that others can build upon.

Please do not connect the corners of buildings to other buildings or features such as highways or residential areas. In the iD Editor, hold down the `Alt` key to prevent your cursor from snapping to existing data and accidentally creating shared(grey) nodes. This [video about connected nodes](https://youtu.be/ltn1VOiq5_0) has more information and a guide.

Please keep this feedbcak in mind in future. I hope this helps.
OSM_RogerWilco (2025-09-15 08:22:50+00:00): Aber dann bitte nicht als Name eintragen!

Wie lange ist sie denn gesperrt?
thal1982 (2025-09-15 11:34:48+00:00): Auf unbestimmte Zeit, siehe:
https://www.dasneuenkirchen.de/de/aktuelles/brueckensperrung/
OSM_RogerWilco (2025-09-15 20:05:29+00:00): Danke, habe die Brücke jetzt auch in OSM gesperrt (access=no). Den "Namen" habe ich in eine Beschreibung (description) geändert.

Ist die Frage, was mit den zwei Nordic-Walking-Routen und der Kunst-Wanderroute solange passiert, oder ob es die überhaupt noch gibt. Weißt Du da was?