piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
micheleOSM3 (2025-12-28 16:36:46+00:00): Hi, by "AV-R1" do you mean "VA-R1"?
Anyway, if the "Via Alpina" project has been renewed, it would be a good idea to clean up the old "Via Alpina" as well. If you need help, I'm here to help.
Will the new "Via Alpina" have signs and trail markers on the ground?
AvdK_Hiker (2025-12-29 08:08:59+00:00): Yes, it should have been "VA-R1".
I'm not affiliated with via-alpina.org, all I have is the info on their website. Unfortenatly, it does not mention anything about old/new/updated trail markers. My working assumption is that the old trail markers are still there, so I leave the old route in tact. I reference the GPS traces on the map of via-alpina.org with the old stages, and if there are differences I make a new route (also, I do not know if the route and/or signs have been updated or if they just took a wrong path). If you would like to help cross-checking the GPS traces, start at the end, and we'll meet in the middle; if not, also fine.
micheleOSM3 (2025-12-30 07:03:40+00:00): Hi, thanks for the clarification.

Just to be sure, are you doing remote mapping, i.e., without hiking the trails in person? If so, I’d like to mention a couple of points based on OSM best practices:

The Hiking mapping guidelines
 recommend mapping what is actually on the ground. Remote mapping without additional reliable sources can sometimes lead to inaccuracies—not necessarily in geometry, but in attributes or trail status.

Leaving old route relations unchanged can be confusing for hikers, especially if the trail has been updated.

I don’t have many opportunities to check trail markings on the ground, but this summer I’ll likely pass through some sections in my region (North-East Italy). In addition, I can verify the geometry remotely using aerial imagery and LiDAR data for my region. I’d be happy to help with that.
AvdK_Hiker (2025-12-30 10:03:02+00:00): Yes, at the moment I'm doing remote mapping. Thanks for your concern to keep confumsions at bay. I have reached out to via-alpina.org for clarification of the signage of the old an new trails. For now, I would like to get a baseline of the new trail in OSM. Changes to it according to signs will come when people start walking it again during the summer months. I'm just working on the route, not actual position/layout of paths or streets, so Lidar data does not seem helpful to my process, but you do you! If I receive more info from via-alpina.org I will post here.
micheleOSM3 (2025-12-30 11:22:13+00:00): Great, thank you so much!
I appreciate your proactivity in verifying the information on the official website.
If it's more convenient for you, you can contact me at this email address: MicheleOSM3@gmail.com
AvdK_Hiker (2026-01-06 19:05:14+00:00): I have received an answer from Via Alpina.org. The old routes are still mostly signed, but will not be maintained. Signs will be removed in the coming months/years depending on a lot of factors. They do not recommend the old routes to stay on OSM. To avoid people to start adding the old routes again as long the signs are still up, I decided to put the Red route (superroute and not-used red stages in the new route) on disused:route=hiking. Maybe next year the old routes can be removed altogether (?). The other colored routes (red, purple, yellow, green, and blue) should also be set to disused.
micheleOSM3 (2026-01-07 07:38:26+00:00): Thanks so much for the information. I think you're doing a great job. I'd suggest adding a short comment in the "note=*" tag of the relevant "relations" to inform future mappers that the "Via Alpina" situation is evolving from the old to the new. Bye, and happy mapping.
eggie (2025-12-28 12:42:31+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  Er zijn hier al adresnodes. Ik heb het adres wel weer verwijderd van de gebouwomtrek.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
vasony (2025-12-29 10:49:33+00:00): Szia!

Légy szíves ne tedd vissza a addr:street-be a Kaszó pusztát, az addr:place-be való, mivel nem "utca" hanem egy nagyobb egység.

Tamás
mcliquid (2026-01-01 09:25:20+00:00): Hello Leo_Dowley1, thank you for your contributions to the HOTOSM project and for helping with the North Sumatra flood response. Your effort in mapping building footprints is much appreciated.

A small note regarding this changeset: when working on HOTOSM tasks, it’s important that each changeset stays **strictly within the assigned task area**. Mixing in edits outside the project boundary (even unintentionally) makes review and validation more difficult and can interfere with coordinated disaster-response mapping.

For future tasks, please consider:

* making sure all edits belong to the active HOTOSM task area,
* uploading frequently, especially if you stop and resume mapping later,
* keeping changesets clearly focused on a single task and location.

This helps validators and project managers review contributions efficiently during time-critical responses.

Thanks again for supporting humanitarian mapping, and happy mapping!
eggie (2025-12-28 14:58:21+00:00): 
De wiki
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Tag:natural%3Dshrubbery
streckenkundler (2025-12-29 17:39:14+00:00): Hei, bei deinem indoor-Mapping sind noch 4 duplicate node ind Way-Fehler, siehe: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=12.53801&lat=52.41069&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Das es indoor ist, scheue ich mich da zu editieren, weil ich nichts kaputt machen möchte...
Danke,

streckenkundler
NeisBot (2025-12-28 16:41:17+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13413137566 v1

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Pallavi Model School Hayathnagar CBSE school"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description
Pallavi Model School Hayathnagar (2025-12-28 16:54:44+00:00): I have updated it as mentioned by you above.
NeisReview (2025-12-28 16:58:59+00:00): Thank you for your reply and for updating the name. As mentioned above, the added description should be revised accordingly.
eggie (2025-12-28 14:29:27+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  foot=yes hoef je niet te taggen op een fietspad. Kwaad kan het niet. 
Er zat een fout in de tag yes
Die heb ik verbeterd. 
Je tags https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=176527934

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
BCNorwich (2025-12-28 14:17:16+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Review request, pretty good for a first effort. I've made a few tweaks to better suit OSM custom so that features render correctly.

Regards Bernard.
CaptainRakeHands (2025-12-28 14:30:05+00:00): Thank you Bernard :)
eggie (2025-12-28 14:34:52+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback Svp geen adresgegevens op gebouwomtrekken zetten. Er zinj al adresnodes. 
Nog een tip.. Beter niet schuiven met de kaart in editmodus. Dat geeft vaak schade door onbedoelde verplaatsingen.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-12-28 14:43:07+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback.. Genoeg te doen hier. layer=-1 heb ik van de building_passage  (aangepast) verwijderd. Dat hoeft niet bij een gebouwdoorgang. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Fischkopp0815 (2025-12-29 09:02:26+00:00): Es gibt schon einen Zahnarzt Kupke in der Nähe. Doppelerfassung oder umgezogen?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3361695412
5R-MFT (2025-12-30 17:03:18+00:00): Lt. Webseite hat er die Hausnummer 22a. Ich vermute das an Hausnr 23 nur ein Namenschild hängt, vielleicht mit einem Pfeil Richtung 22a.
Fischkopp0815 (2025-12-31 15:15:24+00:00): Das sehe ich inzwischen auch so.Das Schild an der Hausecke siehst du hier (Bild von Juni 2023)

https://panoramax.openstreetmap.fr/?background=streets&focus=pic&map=17/54.194192/9.093059&pic=ab4086d0-c0c3-4862-becc-244f5d7b2506&seq=c84824fc-43dc-442d-903b-7906f760bcf8&speed=250&theme=default&xyz=149.00/0.00/30
silversurfer83 (2025-12-28 13:52:35+00:00): Hi :)

bist du dir hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13413202125 bei dem Namen sicher? Oder ist das nur eine Beschreibung?

Vergleiche: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176528516
hondejakob (2025-12-28 19:14:42+00:00): Hallo!

Du hast recht, den Namen hab ich mir ausgedacht, so hieß es nicht wirklich! Ich nehm ihn raus :)
Liebe Grüße aus Berlin!
bernward1 (2025-12-29 10:22:26+00:00): Wenn du die Buslinien mit ref=538 und nicht mit ref=Rufbus 538 taggest, werden sie in PTNA geprüft.
https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/DE/RP/DE-RP-VRT-Analysis.html
(große Hilfe um die Qualität zu verbessern. )

Wünsche dir viel Spaß beim mappen von Buslinien. Wäre schön wenn die deine gemappten Linien in Zukunft im Auge behälts bei Fahrplanänderungen.
NeisBot (2025-12-28 16:36:19+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 24 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/737881388 v9 | 6 crossings
https://osm.org/way/737881389 v5 | 4 crossings
https://osm.org/way/804931836 v2 | 4 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/6909169321 v4
https://osm.org/node/6684848238 v5
https://osm.org/node/3245260929 v5

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=176529625
NeisReview (2025-12-28 16:45:31+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176533987
NeisBot (2025-12-28 13:56:13+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your changesets and noticed that the cumulative count of your recent edits (3 changesets) shows that 586 of your last 598 changes were deletions. This is quite an unusual proportion, so I wanted to check with you.

Could you please confirm whether these deletions were intentional or if they may have occurred by mistake?

#DeletionsCheck #Cumulative
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?uid=23026834
NeisReview (2025-12-28 15:21:30+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176533051
Minh Nguyen (2026-01-01 00:27:56+00:00): Ah, there goes my favorite test case for advanced Unicode support. 😛
Lejun (2026-01-01 12:45:53+00:00): OSM won't fall prey to those kind of shenanigans under my watch! Hide your unicodes, for I am the butcher🦸
rempshaener (2025-12-28 19:08:49+00:00): Hallo,
„pillar“ passt hier nicht zu einer Saugstelle.
Vielleicht passt fire_hydrant:type=pipe besser?
Bitte unterlasse es generell, Namen bei Hydranten zu erfassen. Umso mehr, wenn Personennamen enthalten sind.
Viele Grüße
eggie (2025-12-28 14:54:08+00:00): Hoi 
Kijk nog even
Wat is scrubbery? 
Bedoel je natural=shrubbery
Slip of the pen op een paar plaatsen? 
Renderen doet shrubbery overigens niet op de standaardkaart. Op andere kaarten wel.

MVG
eggie
Xoder (2025-12-28 15:34:10+00:00): Ja, duidelijk een typo. Heb het aangepast.
eggie (2025-12-28 15:39:59+00:00): Wanneer je gewend bent met dit soort tools als bv Qgis kun je het beste overstappen naar editor josm. Die geeft direct validatie bij upload.
eggie (2025-12-28 15:41:47+00:00): https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/editor-josm-stap-voor-stap/75047
Bienson (2025-12-29 10:26:55+00:00): Unverbundene Wege (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1462320257), Bürgersteig nicht als Bürgersteig getaggt (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1462320252 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1462320253), die sich auch noch kreuzen bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13413348707.
Schräger Fußweg zum Gebäude und dabei Eingangstür verfehlt (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1462320251).
Zufahrtsweg über Garage gezeichnet (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1462320247).
Grundstückszufahrten werden außerdem als service=driveway getaggt.
Mond00 (2025-12-29 16:20:36+00:00): korrigiert und ein paar Gebäude an ALKIS angepasst
A67-A67 (2025-12-28 17:15:39+00:00): In deze wijziging worden rijstroken (gescheiden met verf) getagd als rijbanen (fysiek gescheiden). Dit is incorrect. Het was goed getagd met de tags change:lanes en een restriction-relatie om verkeerde navigatie te voorkomen.

Ik zal het herstellen.
pixelmender (2025-12-28 17:40:06+00:00): En toch navigeert OsmAnd het verkeerd. Ik zal daar (ook) maar gaan klagen ;)
pixelmender (2025-12-28 17:51:06+00:00): Ik moet er bij zeggen dat ik het niet helemaal eens ben met je klassificatie (dan kan je ook zeggen dat de zuidelijke baan ook met verf is gescheiden), maar ik leg me bij je edit neer.
Fraxi (2025-12-28 19:38:29+00:00): Можете да видите темата за контейнерите във форума:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/topic/136856

Ако имате Everydoor, там може да се добави и plugin, създаден за целта. Добавят се данни за бройки и цветове и после @Dimitar155 ги уеднаквява със скрипт.
MNbrn (2026-01-16 18:21:47+00:00): Официальное название Ботсада на казахском: Астана ботаникалық БАҒЫ или ботаникалық БАҚ
Lyon-St-Clair (2026-02-01 22:20:05+00:00): Merci de supprimer vos lignes fictives
NeisBot (2025-12-28 16:36:25+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 24 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1462322186 v3 | 24 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/6611836655 v3

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=176531335
NeisReview (2025-12-28 16:53:22+00:00): Could be fixed by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176537647
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-04 02:13:11+00:00): Hello!

You used
cycle_barrier=doubled
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4701457278/history

Have you maybe meant
cycle_barrier=double
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
rempshaener (2026-02-04 17:31:12+00:00): Hello,

you are right, it is just a type. I fixed it.

Thanks
Fraxi (2025-12-28 19:35:32+00:00): Това сигурно са били гаражи. Добре, е че актуализирате тази информация, но когато такива сгради са налични върху сателитни снимки и има вероятност да бъдат добавени отново от друг картограф, е по-добре да се тагнат с demolished:building=garages. (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:demolished:*) Примерно. Или с was=*  На MAF снимките се виждат няколко.
ItaliA1delSole (2025-12-28 14:36:44+00:00): Rampa B: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=45.83990984166701&lng=9.044561215476165&z=18.165268811066063&pKey=395587245466702&focus=photo&x=0.6537540328003432&y=0.605840128300892&zoom=2.1655059853379743
Busaiolis (2026-01-26 11:32:14+00:00): Buongiorno, scrivo per segnalare che riclassificando lo svincolo di Como lago da motorway_link a primary si perdono le informazioni relative alle restrizioni di accesso. Perciò, se si decide di mappare la strada così, è necessario l'uso del tag motorroad=yes e possibilmente anche motorroad:type=strada_riservata_veicoli_a_motore (cfr. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:motorroad:type)
NeisBot (2025-12-28 14:48:22+00:00): Hi Điện Anh, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 3 amenity(s)
- 6 building(s)
- 7 highway(s)
- 22 landuse(s)
- 7 leisure(s)
- 7 natural(s)
- 4 sport(s)
- 1 surface(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=176532277
NeisReview (2025-12-28 15:21:23+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176533051
NeisBot (2025-12-28 16:36:31+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 23 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1462322186 v3 | 23 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/10046999811 v2
https://osm.org/node/9557599284 v2
https://osm.org/node/10778392201 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=176533005
NeisReview (2025-12-28 16:53:59+00:00): Could be fixed by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176537647
NeisReview (2025-12-28 15:05:18+00:00): Please stop deleting!
NeisReview (2025-12-28 15:05:42+00:00): Account has been reported to the DWG.
NeisReview (2025-12-28 15:09:21+00:00): Account has been blocked ... https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19231
Taya_S (2025-12-28 15:18:16+00:00): All edits by this user have been reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176533987
thebeastmodo1 (2025-12-30 11:59:14+00:00): did you know vandals are not fun so stop.
BCNorwich (2025-12-30 08:15:38+00:00): Hi, Are the buildings really those strange shapes? They would be much better squared up, shortcut Q in the iD editor. Very easy to do.

Regards Bernard.
Filip009 (2026-01-09 13:49:10+00:00): Ahoj, severne nad Benicami je naschvál prerušená cesta I/18?
Robert SLK2 (2026-01-09 20:18:12+00:00): Ahoj. Vďaka za upozornenie, už som to opravil.
Filip009 (2026-01-09 20:20:11+00:00): Super, vďaka :)
Hb- (2026-02-08 20:06:57+00:00): Was ist mit den amenity=letter_box bei den geänderten Adressen? Zum Beispiel node/11933767512 Bleiben dort die alten Adressen?
kabelhaai (2026-01-26 20:11:09+00:00): Zie https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5144068 in kader van "buildings" aub
pitfire (2026-02-16 05:20:03+00:00): Hallo PiJu,
kannst Du genauer beschreiben was mit Hs. Bensberger Straße 312 in Forsbach passiert ist? Zur Zeit besteht folgender Zustand:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=176536137
VG pitfire
PiJu (2026-02-16 06:32:06+00:00): Hallo pitfire,

das Gebäude wurde abgerissen. Bei meinem letzten Besuch vor 2 Monaten war dort nur noch eine Freifläche. Ggf. wird hier neu gebaut.

Gruß
PiJu
pitfire (2026-02-16 08:21:08+00:00): Danke, habs angepasst: Lifecycle prefix. Adapted
VG
NorthCrab_upload (2025-12-29 04:43:31+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.

"Różewo":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1181031611
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1181031778
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1462359554
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1462359555
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1462359556
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1462359557
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1462359558
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1462359559

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-01 15:46:15+00:00): Hello!

You used
incline=downu
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1462360477/history

Have you maybe meant
incline=down
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
Raubwaldy (2026-02-01 21:22:26+00:00): Hey, thank you! I am pretty new here, and only uploaded a few ways I found to be missing. So there is a high chance I messed up some things here. 

Right now I don't even know how to edit it, but yes I am sure it is a typo by me! can you fix it for me?
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-06-14 07:28:13+00:00): Fixed!

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3787457626/history is now marked as being lower than https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3787457608/history
vrix (2025-12-28 22:17:59+00:00): Hello Kovoschiz, I see that you're making many changes in Hong Kong. However, I see now that the 3 main divisions of HK are not children of HK any more, e.g. for this one Hong Kong is not in the hirarchy anymore https://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/ui/details.html?osmtype=R&osmid=10268964 

Could you please explain your changes?
vrix (2025-12-28 22:40:33+00:00): And I also see that HK is now address_rank = 16  which means "city / town / village". That doesn't seem right.
Kovoschiz (2025-12-29 18:40:18+00:00): That's Nominatim's fault. It overwrites the `admin_level=` with the `label` `place=` `address_rank:` counterintuitively. Has already been worked around with `admin_centre` yesterday. Need to wait for it to update or something.
habi (2025-12-28 20:44:37+00:00): Zufall: Ich bin heute Abend ca. 17:00 mit der Familie auf den Inline-Skates hier durchgefahren und fand, dass da die Adressen noch nicht erfasst sind.
Jetzt, als ich diese mit JOSM erfassen will, sehe ich, dass du das schon gemacht hast.
Hätten wir uns fast über den Weg laufen können.
E Gruess us der Gegend,
Habi
Firefishy (2025-12-29 14:39:07+00:00): Does the takeaway have a name?
NeisReview (2025-12-29 10:11:08+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/530096383 v3
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/551471482 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=176537548
NeisBot (2025-12-28 16:36:44+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 24 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1462322186 v4 | 24 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=176537647
NeisReview (2026-01-07 17:38:40+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/176938528
Baloo Uriza (2026-01-21 16:31:58+00:00): This looks like it got realigned through an abandoned and blocked off lot.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176537741