piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
woodpeck (2026-02-11 22:01:25+00:00): Dear Pan, a while ago you were involved in a dispute with other community members about the detail of your mapping (especially the detail of forests if I remember correctly). You have not really relented much since then; in this changeset you have added two traffic islands of maybe 10m² each, and meticulously traced their outline with over 10 nodes each. Many micro forests in the vicinity have an unnatural node density (suggesting a precision that the forest will outgrow within a year). You are painting the map with micro grass strips and micro forests that look straight like blobs from the "potrace" software ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19907734). Please reconsider your modus operandi or there will come a time when we have to write a program that takes every single landuse you ever touched and reduces their number of points by 75%.
Pan (2026-02-11 22:13:57+00:00): Dear Woodpeck, thanks for bringing that up. I have to say that I did change the way I map. This sort of way looks nothing like the way I used to map before the discussion which you interrupted in 2022 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1476375806/history#map=19/46.227387/6.991242). 

I know nothing about the software you mention. All the mapping I have ever done was performed manually.  More broadly, the general approach in your critics is unnecessarily agressive in its tone and it is still difficult for me to understand why.  

Nevertheless, I will take it into account and avoir close nodes in trafic islands.
NeisBot (2026-02-10 05:30:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/715911383 v6

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Hotel building"

#MapWithoutSpam
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-12 07:11:42+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nieprawidłowa wartość addr:postcode. Kod pocztowy powinien być formatu XX-XXX, gdzie X oznacza cyfrę.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/715911383

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
FajrAl (2026-02-10 12:07:30+00:00): Selamat datang di OpenStreetMap. Perlu diketahui bahwa data di OSM bersifat publik, jadi sebaiknya jangan menambahkan data pribadi seperti nama pemilik sebuah rumah ya.
michael60634 (2026-02-10 06:04:27+00:00): Note: The changeset description is the reason I reverted an edit, and is not intended to describe my own edit.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-22 08:11:53+00:00): Split SEO POI fom apartment building and fix/clean up tags for both in changeset 184419996

https://osm.org/changeset/184419996
NeisBot (2026-02-10 06:27:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 19 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1339506080 v2 | 8 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1339506068 v2 | 4 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1339506061 v2 | 3 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/12390601165 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178341787
NeisReview (2026-02-19 05:34:47+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/178441895
Patrick78 (2026-02-10 12:45:18+00:00): Bonjour, Je viens de voir que vous avez fait plusieurs mises à jour sur le réseau Néva sur base il me semble d'une importation gouv.fr. Le soucis c'est que beaucoup d'arrêts de sont pas dans le bon sens et il manque des bouts de routes. On se retrouve avec ici un arrêt de l 'autre coté de la chaussée (ex : Lycées qui ne tient pas compte du parking bus, Agora, et ZA Prétôt). Bref j'ai du mal à voir l’intérêt de ces mises à jour sans avoir fait une vérification avant de sauvegarder dans OSM. Je pense qu'il faut retravailler ligne à ligne pour remettre ça au propre. Cdlt,
mga_geo (2026-02-10 13:49:47+00:00): Bonjour,
J'utilise effectivement le GTFS présent sur https://transport.data.gouv.fr/datasets/neva-granville-terre-et-mer.
Souvent sur les GTFS les positions des arrêts ne sont pas actualisées rapidement et sont assez approximatives.
J'ai ajouté les lignes 3 et 7 qui n'existaient pas, je suis en train de corrigé le parcours.
J'ai demandé à Toni d'inclure ce réseau dans PTNA pour identifier les erreurs.
Marc
Patrick78 (2026-02-10 19:41:43+00:00): J'ai corrigé la ligne 3 dans les 2 sens mais la 2 est vraiment plus longue. J'arrive toujours pas à comprendre comment on peut importer des données sans les vérifier. Cela au final génère des erreurs. Cdlt,
mga_geo (2026-02-11 13:49:05+00:00): L'analyse PTNA est disponible: https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/FR/NOR/FR-NOR-Neva-Analysis.html
NeisBot (2026-02-10 06:39:41+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 11 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1339506068 v3 | 6 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1339506061 v3 | 3 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178342175
NeisBot (2026-02-10 06:42:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13539921885 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Dental clinic"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-19 05:34:21+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178753795
(Cleaned up leftovers from previous edits)
NeisBot (2026-02-10 06:45:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 15 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1339506080 v3 | 9 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1339506068 v4 | 6 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/12390601084 v2
https://osm.org/node/12390601071 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178342357
NeisReview (2026-02-19 05:34:48+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/178342399
https://osm.org/changeset/178342442
https://osm.org/changeset/178441895
NeisBot (2026-02-10 06:45:41+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 11 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1339506068 v5 | 6 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1339506080 v4 | 5 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/13539933622 v2
https://osm.org/node/12390601084 v3

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178342399
NeisReview (2026-02-19 05:34:48+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/178441895
NeisBot (2026-02-10 06:51:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 8 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1339506080 v5 | 5 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1339506062 v2 | 3 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/12390601090 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178342575
NeisReview (2026-02-19 05:34:49+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/178441895
arjunaraoc (2026-02-17 00:14:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178342733
arjunaraoc (2026-02-17 00:24:47+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178342733
arjunaraoc (2026-02-17 00:26:33+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178342733
NeisBot (2026-02-10 07:06:19+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your changesets and noticed that the cumulative count of your recent edits (4 changesets) shows that 406 of your last 419 changes were deletions. This is quite an unusual proportion, so I wanted to check with you.

Could you please confirm whether these deletions were intentional or if they may have occurred by mistake?

#DeletionsCheck #Cumulative
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?uid=23778094
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-12 07:11:44+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13539967070

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Joseph R P (2026-02-10 20:51:37+00:00): I don't think these roads should be primary, specifically because they see relatively low traffic volumes and serve areas with low, mostly-residential development, especially roads like Reverence and Cliff Shadows which barely just make it to secondary in terms of connectivity and importance in the road network. Secondary is a good classification for roads like these since they serve as a halfway between a tertiary collector road like Grand Canyon or Gowan and a major thoroughfare like Cheyenne or Rampart.
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-02-11 16:39:33+00:00): First of all, why did I not see this notification earlier? Gmail has failed me again... And second of all, alright, I'll go change all of these back to secondary, since Desert Foothills is approximately the only "major" thouroughfare west of the 215. (Maybe that will change in the future, but for now, it and maybe Sky Vista Drive and Park Drift Trail are the only thouroughfares in that area.) Speaking of low density, mostly residential areas, I did find a sign at the intersection of Orrock Street and Chickadee Avenue proudly proclaiming that the area will contain a mixed-use area, which is always better for people anyway. How would the classification of these roads change if they were in a mixed-use area verses an almost-entirely residential area?
Joseph R P (2026-02-11 19:53:34+00:00): Though the sparse population and lack of any major non-residential development is the reason the lack of traffic and priority in the road network Ann Rd has between the Beltway and Durango, when referring to the low development of the Summerlin West, I'm referring not to the development density but really that this is the edge of Las Vegas and is primarily residential, thus roads in the area aren't serving thru traffic as much as they are serving the Summerlin West development and only that as there's really nowhere else that the roads can connect to. This differs from roads like Town Center, Rampart, Cheyenne, Charleston, etc. which either span the valley, link thru traffic to other major roads and freeways, serve large swaths of commercial development, see high traffic counts across their entire routes, etc.
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-13 00:13:47+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13539976267

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-13 00:13:45+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13539938395

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
TrickyFoxy (2026-02-10 09:38:04+00:00): Что вы имели в виду?
NeisBot (2026-02-10 07:24:48+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/49156294 v5

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Microblading studio"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-02-19 05:34:21+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/178393857
NeisBot (2026-02-10 07:24:49+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/49538560 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Microblading studio"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-02-19 05:34:21+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/178389806
gscholz (2026-03-14 06:55:09+00:00): Hi Diana,
your and your colleagues changesets have left behind a huge amount of self intersecting buildings:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=31.61624&lat=4.81799&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
pitscheplatsch (2026-02-14 15:12:27+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178548030
SekeRob repair (2026-02-10 10:10:19+00:00): Hi,

You missed a stretch... and I still don't get how 1 has had 3 versions and the one below 12. How do they do this? Imports?

ciao
Taya_S (2026-02-11 08:42:48+00:00): Why do you keep constantly making these big undiscussed and badly thought out changes to places on the other side of the world from you? I have reverted this changeset.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178394794
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-02-11 16:03:32+00:00): boundary=land_area is only used 158 times and is not even documented on the wiki. What does it even mean?
Taya_S (2026-02-11 16:18:04+00:00): Place=continent is only used 9 times, and only as node. Plus there already exists a (somewhat questionable) Australia continent node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1209843025

But how did you think that an area that only consists of mainland Australia could represent a continent? Is Tasmania not part of the Australian Continent? What happened to Papua New Guinea (and should it be the entire island, or just half of it)? 

The only reason this is tagged like this is because people disagree with calling it a place=island. Not so that someone who has already thoroughly been told why attempting to clearly define the geographical shapes of continents is a bad idea (https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/america-relation/136587) can just go around and retag it without doing even an ounce of research into what people even consider 'the continent of Australia' to be.

If you want to go and clearly figure out and describe what a boundary=land_area is, go ahead, good idea. But don't just change tags that you don't understand.
Taya_S (2026-02-11 16:19:09+00:00): (That was the incorrect continent node, the correct one is openstreetmap.org/node/12098430255)
NeisBot (2026-02-10 07:56:26+00:00): 🌍 Welcome to OSM, Kozinmin0775.
Thanks for contributing!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

✅ Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added place name "မြို့မကျောင်းဘုရား""
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish
Warin61 (2026-02-11 01:30:23+00:00): HI,
There is an error in Alpine National Park relation 2248617 - not closed.
eggie (2026-02-10 09:02:15+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-02-10 09:03:02+00:00): k heb een officetag toegevoegd. Alleen een naam doet niets in OSM.
arjunaraoc (2026-02-16 12:17:25+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check my update https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178627484
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178347266
eggie (2026-02-10 09:05:25+00:00): Welkom bij OSM. Bedankt voor je bijdrage. Evt kan phone=+31 en website ook worden toegevoegd.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-02-10 11:24:35+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
mueschel (2026-02-18 09:19:17+00:00): Hi,
"diet:muslim-friendly" is not a common tag - what exactly does it mean? Does the cafe offer halal food?
NeisBot (2026-02-10 09:18:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13540096536 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "IT office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-19 05:34:22+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178753796
(No visible changes after review)
NeisBot (2026-02-10 09:26:24+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your changesets and noticed that the cumulative count of your recent edits (4 changesets) shows that 580 of your last 581 changes were deletions. This is quite an unusual proportion, so I wanted to check with you.

Could you please confirm whether these deletions were intentional or if they may have occurred by mistake?

#DeletionsCheck #Cumulative
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?uid=23240706
Furia oscura (2026-02-10 15:05:49+00:00): si
Frans S (2026-03-19 10:23:56+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
When you want to add a  "ford" to a water/highway crossing, don't add it to the waterway itself, but add a node to the crossing and tag that as 'ford"
Best regards.
Frans S (2026-03-19 10:43:56+00:00): Hi. Another remark.
There’s no need to map every short section of trail that branches off from another trail and leads to a few huts, especially if those huts are visible from the other trail.
Best regards
Masyas (2026-02-10 10:39:38+00:00): 在id总建筑绘制完毕后，建议使用快捷键Q将其直角化
eggie (2026-02-10 11:27:50+00:00): Beste Cas.. Wanneer een bedrijf sluit zal het adres toch ook niet verdwijnen?

Nog een tip. Svp geen adressen zelf aanmaken, maar bijtaggen op de bestaande adresnode. 
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=178348782
MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-02-10 11:30:37+00:00): adres hersteld...   winkelinfo samengevoegd met adresnode.
El begin is moeilijk.
gr eggie
Cas_H (2026-02-10 11:55:21+00:00): Excuus, ik had niet door dat ik het adres had verwijderd, ik dacht dat "remove feature" enkel de dierenkliniek zou verwijderen.
eggie (2026-02-10 11:58:10+00:00): Nou.. Je 'moet' echt alleen de bedrijfsinfo eraf halen.
Die adresnodes zijn import vanuit de BAG.
Mapse