piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2023-09-24 09:39:36+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
A: Inaccurate mapped. 
E. Rectangular buildings not squared.
H: A courtyard or a clearing not mapped into a building.
* Tagging of buildings. For HOTOSM projects, the standard tagging is 'building=yes' No further text adding.  Please keep that in mind at further mappings.
Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141315821
Frans S (2023-09-16 09:04:31+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
A: E: Inaccurate mapped and / or not squared.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141315835
SomeoneElse2 (2024-05-15 22:06:28+00:00): I'm guessing that the "clothes=men" tag on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/107045740 might not be valid any more?
Robert Whittaker (2024-05-15 22:18:30+00:00): No indeed. Now fixed, thanks!
streckenkundler (2023-09-15 20:13:50+00:00): Bitte Quelle angeben und Belege zeigen! 
Weder Bing, noch Esri noch LGB-Luftbilder zeigen hier einen Solarpark und/oder abgerissene Gebäude...
Frans S (2023-09-16 09:02:30+00:00): Hello again.
As written before, focus on the goals of this project.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141315969
Vinber (2024-10-25 17:24:27+00:00): Bonjour,
toujours rien de visible même sur ortho express 2024.

Savez vous si cela existe ? Je le passe en construction pour l'instant.

bonne carto
mcliquid (2023-09-18 15:13:42+00:00): Hi, meinst du hier wirklich "motor_vehicle=designated" oder eher "destination"?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141316063
bernardo60 (2023-09-18 17:22:20+00:00): Ja, Forstwege dürfen bei Sondergenehmigung auch mit Fahrzeugen genutzt werden. Hier stand noch dabei, dass es für Fahrräder verboten war. Übrigens - stammsr Du aus dieser Region? Ich war erstaunt, wie viel Wege für Fahrräder gesperrt sind, dies aber nicht bei OSM vermerkt war.
mcliquid (2023-09-18 17:30:35+00:00): Aber ist dann "designated" wirklich richtig? Würde nicht einfach nur "yes" reichen?
In Österreich ist Fahrradfahren im Wald größtenteils verboten. Der Community-Konsens ist meines Wissens, dass man die Entscheidung den Routern überlässt und nicht an alle Waldwege ein "bicycle=no" ergänzt.
bernardo60 (2023-09-18 18:14:52+00:00): Gut, designated oder "no" (nicht yes) ist nicht so entscheidend. Ich würde nur Wege als "no bikes" kennzeichnen, wenn das ausdrücklich so ausgeschildert ist. Apps wie z.B. Komoot schliessen sie dann aus bei Auto-Routing. Wenn Du das nicht machst, kann es sein, dass Komoot Dir diese Wege als Option anbieten.
mcliquid (2023-09-20 16:11:51+00:00): Ich vermute hier liegt ein Missverständnis bei den Werten vor. Kann es sein, dass du mit "designated" etwas anderes verbindest?
Nur mal ein Beispiel:

bicycle=designated gibt an, dass es sich um einen gewidmeten und ausgeschilderten Radweg handelt. (Blaues Schild mit weißem Fahrrad).

bicycle=no heißt, hier sind Fahrräder komplett verboten.

Mit anderen Worten: designated und no sind genau das Gegensätzliche.

Siehe auch: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:access%3Ddesignated
bernardo60 (2023-09-22 02:42:15+00:00): Jetzt verstehe ich Dein Anliegen. Eine Forststrasse, wo ausdrücklich Fahrräder nicht erlaubt sind, sollte bei Access nur den "tag" bicycle:no anzeigen, für motorisierte Fahrzeuge reicht der "default".  Mein tag "designated" war nicht richtig. Zitat Wiki: "highway=track does not imply any particular access=* value. Default access restrictions are country specific and depend on ownership, land use and other factors. If you have local knowledge or can do a survey to obtain ground truth, adding explicit access tags is recommended." Ich werde das in dem Changeset korrigieren. Danke für Deinen Input. Übrigens, es wäre schön und hilfreich, wenn Du unter Deinem "user account" ein wenig über Deine Interesse mit OSM erzählst ("About me").
mcliquid (2023-09-22 07:00:00+00:00): Danke! Ich habe ein "About me" in meinem User-Profil ergänzt.
Nádia Cristina Da Silva Mello (2023-09-17 01:08:40+00:00): Mapeamento_OBRAC_2023_Vias_Contão
Patchanka (2024-01-15 18:36:09+00:00): bonjour
j'ai vu que vous aviez changé le nom de rue "Rue Léon Morane" pour mettre Maurane. 
Il y a maintenant une note qui indique que ce serait "Morane" ici : https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4070060
Et la BANO est du même avis.
Pourquoi avoir modifié, est-ce que sur le panneau c'est écrit avec "au" ? Je ne trouve pas la source de votre modification.
Vinber (2024-10-25 17:33:44+00:00): je vais revenir à Morane :)

le seul endroit où j'ai trouvé Maurane c'est sur google !!!

et Léon Morane est parti de Mérignac en avion https://bassin-arcachon-patrimoine-naval-plaisance.fr/2021/10/21/leon-morane-a-lile-aux-oiseaux/
Frans S (2023-09-16 09:00:56+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
A: E: Inaccurate mapped and / or not squared.
* Tagging of buildings. For HOTOSM projects, the standard tagging is 'building=yes' No further text adding.  Please keep that in mind at further mappings.
Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141316243
Nádia Cristina Da Silva Mello (2023-09-17 01:08:59+00:00): Mapeamento_OBRAC_2023_Vias_Contão
Argbjorn (2023-09-15 20:47:18+00:00): Hi, Diixiing. You've drew nonexistent buildings and broke geometry of existing ones. Please, don't do that.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141316285
Nádia Cristina Da Silva Mello (2023-09-17 01:09:11+00:00): Mapeamento_OBRAC_2023_Vias_Contão
RedstoneRelic (2023-09-15 19:14:43+00:00): Jesus, this is a large edit  area
Awoobis (2023-09-16 17:10:03+00:00): E
DressyPear4 (2023-09-16 01:13:53+00:00): Todas as suas edições possuem vias desconectadas, revise antes de enviar os dados
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141316707
Nádia Cristina Da Silva Mello (2023-09-16 15:20:52+00:00): MAPEAMENTO_OBRAC_2023_VIAS_CONTÃO
Nádia Cristina Da Silva Mello (2023-09-16 15:20:35+00:00): MAPEAMENTO_OBRAC_2023_VIAS_CONTÃO
Nádia Cristina Da Silva Mello (2023-09-16 15:20:17+00:00): MAPEAMENTO_OBRAC_2023_VIAS_CONTÃO
Frans S (2023-09-16 08:58:57+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
A: E: Inaccurate mapped and / or not squared.
D: Connecting nodes of buildings to other buildings or features like roads and residential areas.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141316866
DressyPear4 (2023-09-16 00:51:18+00:00): Não grude pontos das vias em linhas de energia
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141317067
Frans S (2023-09-16 08:56:20+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 
How to map building with courtyards 
 1   Draw the outer outline of the building as an area. Tag as a building
 2  Draw each of the inner courtyards/plazas as areas. Tag as needed, or not at all
 3  Hold 'SHIFT' and select all the areas
 4  Press 'C' to create a multipolygon with all the areas

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141317150
Frans S (2023-09-16 08:55:26+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please focus on roads connecting settlemenst , houses and villages  and buildings.
Best regards
Frans S (2023-09-16 08:28:17+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
A: E: Inaccurate mapped and / or not squared.
D: Connecting nodes of buildings to other buildings or features like roads and residential areas.
Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141317472
ovruni (2023-09-16 00:16:20+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres#Nombre_es_solo_el_nombre
map per (2023-09-17 19:27:28+00:00): Hallo xam262,

das von dir eingezeichnete Gebäude existiert nicht. Ich hab deine Ändrung rückgängig gemacht.

Viele Grüße
map per
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-09-16 10:02:22+00:00): Hi, this is not a windmill. It was a windmill, we map what objects are today.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-09-16 10:05:15+00:00): But in case of windmills I think it's ok just to add

windmill:disused=yes
functional=no
windmill:vanes=no

and leave it as windmill
Frans S (2023-09-16 08:26:11+00:00): Hello.  Please focus on buildings and roads which connects houses, Settlements, hamlets etc.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141317954
emersonveenstra (2023-09-16 11:41:11+00:00): Hi there,

On https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16335611, you seem to have double-mapped the track with different tag values, the relation says lanes=8, but https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1208136244 says lanes=4. Could you please add the correct number of lanes to the relation and remove the tags from the ways? Thanks!
DressyPear4 (2023-09-16 01:11:08+00:00): Não altere a classificação das vias existentes
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141318051
Frans S (2023-09-16 08:23:41+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Please focus on the objects which need to be mapped.  Roads and buildings! Please don't waste time on other objects.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141318260
JoltCode (2023-09-16 21:12:56+00:00): Ohh thanks! Seems I've been spending too long on the farmlands then 😅😭
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141318260
Frans S (2023-09-16 08:20:45+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped.  However, don't waste time to map unimportant tracks in between agricultural fields. Roads connecting houses - settlements are the goal.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141318338
opendcc (2023-09-20 18:52:35+00:00): Hallo,

in der Datenbank selbst werden keine Abkürzungen eingetragen, dort steht der volle Name: 
name=Freiwillige Feuerwehr Tattendorf. Die Ausleitung aus der Datenbank macht dann die Abkürzungen nach Standardregeln.

Servus Wolfgang
Frans S (2023-09-16 08:18:24+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 
Buildings need to be tagged as building=yes.
Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141318379
Frans S (2023-09-16 08:15:58+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 
How to map building with courtyards 
 1   Draw the outer outline of the building as an area. Tag as a building
 2  Draw each of the inner courtyards/plazas as areas. Tag as needed, or not at all
 3  Hold 'SHIFT' and select all the areas
 4  Press 'C' to create a multipolygon with all the areas
Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141318478
danbjoseph (2023-10-02 13:40:25+00:00): it seems you've added a cycleway along Howard University's boundary. this includes along Georgia Ave (where there is no bike lane infrastructure), and just north of the DC Water buildings where there is no public access.
danbjoseph (2023-10-02 13:43:19+00:00): and for 5th street NW, your addition is a duplicate as the cycleway is tagged to the road, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/6059154#map=17/38.92500/-77.01935&layers=C
Glassman (2023-09-15 23:47:17+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.

Two issues - according to King County, the road is Northeast 133rd Place. See https://gismaps.kingcounty.gov/iMap/

Also this looks like a city road so there is no need for the access tag the other user added.

Can you update the street? Let me know if you need help. 

And thanks for update.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141318643
Frans S (2023-09-16 08:14:47+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 
Buildings need to be tagged as building=yes.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141318778
Frans S (2023-09-16 08:13:43+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)

A: E: Inaccurate mapped and / or not squared.

C: Collecting multiple buildings and mapping them as 1 building.
G: include the shadow of a building in the mapping.
=========
Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141318833
Frans S (2023-09-16 08:13:50+00:00): Hello again.  FYI
How to map building with courtyards 
 1   Draw the outer outline of the building as an area. Tag as a building
 2  Draw each of the inner courtyards/plazas as areas. Tag as needed, or not at all
 3  Hold 'SHIFT' and select all the areas
 4  Press 'C' to create a multipolygon with all the areas
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141318833
DressyPear4 (2023-09-16 01:05:51+00:00): Não adicione via por cima da existente
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141318916
pigsonthewing (2023-09-15 21:03:08+00:00): Thank you
ovruni (2023-09-16 00:17:01+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenos_comentarios_en_conjuntos_de_cambios
Frans S (2023-09-16 14:28:18+00:00): See my comments about highways
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141319326
YomanNH (2023-09-16 11:31:32+00:00): Cześć,

w jakim celu dodałeś drogi dla rowerów pokrywające się z prawidłowo zmapowanymi ciągami pieszo-rowerowymi? Przykładowo dodałeś takie coś: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1208147975, co dubluje prawidłowo zmapowany ciąg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1112858691.
embas (2023-09-16 15:52:13+00:00): Cześć,
1/ Jeśli chodzi o trasowanie to poprawiłem delikatnie przebiegi ścieżek:
a/ Od strony wschodniej torowiska  tramwajowego na odcinku pomiędzy ul. F.Nila a miejscem, w którym tory lekko skręcają jest to linia prosta.
b/ Od strony zachodniej torowiska tramwajowego na odcinku F. Nila-Kluczborska ścieżka piesza oraz rowerowa zostały rozdzielone pasem zieleni. Ścieżka rowerowa przebiega na tym odcinku po śladzie starego torowiska tramwajowego, natomiast chodnik pozostał nieruszony.
Na dalszym odcinku tj. Kluczborska-Bratysławska jest to już w zasadzie jedna prosta, ale przebiegająca bliżej osiedla (ciąg pieszo-rowerowy nie dochodzi do przystanku Bratysławska tylko do przejścia pieszo-rowerowego przy ul. Wybickiego). Tak teraz patrzę na mapę projektową tramwaju i widzę, że należałoby jeszcze skorygować mapowanie tego odcinka, bo teraz na wysokości Kluczborskie łączy się na wprost z chodnikiem a powinien ze ścieżką rowerową.
2/ Jeśli chodzi o rodzaj ścieżek to właśnie tutaj miałem zagwozdkę - czy te dwie, wyraźnie oznaczone w terenie ścieżki tj. pieszą wykonaną z kostki brukowej oraz rowerową wyasfaltowaną traktować jako jeden ciąg pieszo-rowerowy czy moze jako dwa różne pokrywające się ze sobą szczególnie, że na odcinku F.Nila-Kluczborska są oddalone od siebie (przedzielone pasem zieleni). Nie znalazłem też w OSM grafiki dedykowanej dla ścieżek pieszo-rowerowych, a w tym przypadku użyty został symbol "Ścieżki (nieokreślonej)" stąd mój pomysł dodania dościeżki nieokreślonej (potraktowałem ją jako ścieżkę dla pieszych) ścieżki rowerowej.
Ale jeżeli wg Ciebie "Ścieżka (nieokreślona)" pełni na mapach OSM funkcję ścieżki pieszo-rowerowej to jak najbardziej dodanie przeze mnie ścieżek rowerowych było niezasadne i należy je usunąć. Aczkolwiek rozdzieliłbym je na odcinku opisanym w pkt 1b
YomanNH (2023-09-17 18:39:45+00:00): Jeśli poprawiłeś przebieg, to dobrze. Póki co nie ma aktualnych zdjęć lotniczych, więc mogło to nie być dodane zbyt dokładnie. Jeśli teraz jest to bardziej zgodne z rzeczywistością, to była to przydatna zmiana.

A jak chodzi o mapowanie ciągów pieszo-rowerowych, to na wiki jest taka informacja:
"Wspólna ścieżka rowerowa i chodnik, z osobną nawierzchnią:
highway=path + surface=paved + segregated=yes + bicycle=designated + foot=designated + cycleway:surface=asphalt + footway:surface=paving_stones"
(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Rowery)
Zgaduję, że tę nazwę "ścieżka (nieokreślona)" widziałeś w edytorze. Te nazwy nie zawsze są idealne. Dodanie bicycle=designated + foot=designated oznacza, że ten ciąg jest przeznaczony dla pieszych i rowerzystów.

Jeśli jest pas zieleni (jak w punkcie 1b), to oczywiście prawidłowe jest utworzenie dwóch osobnych linii.

Pozdrawiam
DressyPear4 (2023-09-16 01:03:43+00:00): Não altere relação se você não sabe o que significa
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141319554