piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2025-10-07 15:36:46+00:00): Bonjour serdrar tazzarine, bienvenue et merci pour votre contribution !

Pour faciliter la collaboration et aider les autres à comprendre vos modifications, il est préférable d'ajouter une brève description des changements que vous avez apportés. Des commentaires clairs aident la communauté à suivre votre travail et à fournir de meilleurs retours. Vous pouvez trouver des conseils pour rédiger de bons commentaires ici[1].

Sur la base de vos modifications de carte dans cet ensemble de changements, j'ai rédigé une suggestion pour ce à quoi un commentaire pourrait ressembler : "Ajout d'une piste routière"
(Auto-translation)
---
Hi serdrar tazzarine, welcome and thanks for your contribution!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

Based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Added track highway"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
NeisBot (2025-10-07 15:27:40+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-10-12 05:13:13+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/172965518
user_5359 (2025-10-08 07:40:53+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/5970720736 more than 100 meters over streets and buildings. 
I moved the node back to the original position.
user_5359 (2025-10-08 07:36:34+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1436217722. What is the mean of the tag guest_house=guest_house (see also https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:guest_house) ?
billbogatay (2025-10-08 16:37:13+00:00): Thank you! Not sure what happened there - went ahead and deleted that tag.
trialanderror (2025-10-07 15:45:55+00:00): Apologies for the missing changeset comment. Street parking data, surveyed on-site.
Nakaner-repair (2025-10-11 13:22:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 173137073 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by BiboORM in Berlin since 2025-09-12 (long-term U-Bahn extensions). We do not map features in earyl planning states. A feasibility study does not mean that this project will be built at all.
Matija Nalis (2025-12-29 22:45:58+00:00): Hi, about 3 months ago you've marked this railway crossing https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/484963970 as `double_half`.
Do you recall what was your source / are you sure it's not regular crossing:barrier=half ? Thanks!
Matija Nalis (2026-01-03 05:55:00+00:00): u svakom slučaju, po zadnjim street-level slikama na https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=3818902188354756 (kao i komentarima na telegram grupi sa local_knowledge) izgleda da je to obični crossing:barrier=half a NE  crossing:barrier=double_half, pa sam tako i izmijenio.
TrickyFoxy (2025-10-11 21:28:32+00:00): 👋  Название Spal точно верное? https://osm.org/node/4346181057
PumpkinPieAficionado (2025-10-07 19:44:34+00:00): Correction: Source used was Vantor satellite imagery via Vantor Hub 2025-05-06
Hadassa Teodoro (2025-10-07 16:20:32+00:00): Calle Brasil esq, Concepción 010107
sawaGani (2025-10-23 14:50:07+00:00): gbasさん、初めまして。
市ノ瀬の山の上にこのやうな建物は無いと思ふのですが、何か有るのでせうか?
間違ひでしたら消しておいて頂ければと思ひます。
user_8655426 (2025-12-31 05:22:01+00:00): Hello, gbas
I have removed the non-existent building that was added in this changeset.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176657796

I also noticed that you have not been providing comments on your changesets, and that you have not responded to comments from other mappers. Please be aware that these issues can lead to user blocks.
・Changeset
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset
・Good changeset comments
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
 ・ResultMaps
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=19080331

In addition, it appears that you are importing PLATEAU data. Have you informed the Japanese community about your import?
Please review the guidelines on the following wiki page.
・Import/Guidelines
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
・MLIT PLATEAU/imports outline
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/MLIT_PLATEAU/imports_outline
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172967293
Fizzie-DWG (2025-10-11 07:57:43+00:00): DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125138
Fizzie-DWG (2025-10-11 07:57:44+00:00): DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125138
Fizzie-DWG (2025-10-11 07:59:52+00:00): DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125205
joel56dt (2026-02-15 05:29:38+00:00): I reverted this changeset because it duplicated an already-mapped substation.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-10-11 07:59:53+00:00): DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125205
Malik Shahbaz iqbal (2025-10-07 16:42:54+00:00): excellebt
InsertUser (2025-10-11 14:08:08+00:00): You needed to create a changeset spanning three continents to add "a missing road segment"??
Neethu P G (2026-02-11 07:58:51+00:00): Apologies for the mistake I committed. Thank you for the valuable feedback. I look forward to your suggestion/feedback in the future as well. Thank you.
rarad74 (2025-10-07 17:18:17+00:00): Hi. Please use  ESRI standard as imegery. Is the best centered and the newest in Romania.
Thank you.
ilias_ (2025-10-07 16:56:53+00:00): Ta route est en terre?? Je ne vois que de la terre sur l'imagerie, telle que Google Earth du 27 Aout 2025
ilias_ (2025-10-07 16:57:42+00:00): Comme expliqué sur ce changeset,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172932391

****ELLE EST ENCORE EN CONSTRUCTION****
Fizzie-DWG (2025-10-11 07:59:54+00:00): DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125205
ilias_ (2025-10-07 16:55:13+00:00): Comment ça cycleway?? C'est une service road, pas une voie cyclable... je ne comprends plus rien à tes edits, ils ont l'air très aléatoires. Si tu continues comme ça je serai obligé de te signaler aux modérateurs.
AndersAndersson (2025-10-10 22:59:27+00:00): Do you have more information about this? The road signs are "Tuna-Hästberg". The official mapping authority are also spelling it that way.
AndersAndersson (2025-10-15 21:38:49+00:00): Bitte antworten Sie.
Was ist Ihre Quelle dafür? Auf den Straßenschildern steht Tuna-Hästberg sowie Lantmäteriet.
AndersAndersson (2025-10-19 19:54:25+00:00): No answer for 9 days. I will change back to the official name but keep this as alt_name.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173508225
notmyproblem1 (2025-10-08 09:22:32+00:00): Ciao caro, Noi non inseriamo i civici dentro al edificio, perfavore mappa il civico dove si trova realmente (In questo caso dove c'è la targhetta "12"), se hai bisogno di altro contattami pure =D
Interswd (2026-02-16 11:47:25+00:00): To nie jest droga ale urządzenie wodne, próg wodny - jaz, przelew powodziowy kamienny z zakazem wstępu na urządzenie wodne. Twoja edycja jest błędna.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-10-11 08:01:30+00:00): DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125238
Fizzie-DWG (2025-10-11 08:01:31+00:00): DWG revert - threatening language, deletions while discussions ongoing

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173125238
Jakka (2025-10-07 20:04:11+00:00): oneway pour tous ? vélo ? mobylette ?
Thierry1030 (2025-10-29 23:12:36+00:00): I passed by today and made pictures > https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1162028802546675
There are still some missing paths ...
Kayo_33 (2025-10-09 15:04:39+00:00): Thanks for updating it! I was wondering if and when it would be changed. Did you import the building shape from Maa-amet or eyeballed it?
fghj753 (2025-10-09 15:13:33+00:00): Thanks for asking. I used Bing's imagery to trace building outline from presumable building foundations and pathways from Esri layer.
dgmapping (2025-10-09 18:02:05+00:00): Updated the building outline based on MaRu ADS data. I hope you don't mind it fghj753 :)

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=173062703
Kayo_33 (2025-10-10 06:41:33+00:00): Thanks y'all!

Isn't there a script that should do the semi- or even automatic imports? What happened to that?
mavl (2025-10-08 09:07:41+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок добавляет непрямоугольное здание, которое не соответствует спутниковому снимку Bing.
Ozon OSM17 (2025-10-08 09:33:27+00:00): Здравствуйте. Исправила, спасибо!
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2025-10-08 14:02:05+00:00): Burası gerçekten anaokuluna mı çevrildi? Yoksa değişikliğiniz deneme amaçlı mı?
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2025-10-22 12:26:31+00:00): Bu binanın kültür merkezi olarak kullanıldığı Meram Belediyesi'nin güncel yayınlarında görünüyor. https://www.meram.bel.tr/ara?q=tantavi 

Lütfen gerçeğe aykırı bilgileri eklemeyiniz. 2 haftadır cevap vermediğiniz için değişikliğinizi geri aldım. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173625262
ilias_ (2025-10-08 08:04:33+00:00): What exactly de you mean by تصحيح الاسماء? All I see is that you deleted the name tag... That's not تصحيح الاسماء.
TnWarrior (2025-10-08 10:56:14+00:00): H Ilias, The user appears to be operating under multiple accounts, including:
Active accounts:
Arab Cartographer
In Your Eyes
Double Devi
مايوركا السامرية
Blocked accounts:
osm.org/user/%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%87%D9%84%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%8A%20%D9%82%D8%B3%D9%88%D8%B1%D8%A9%20%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B9%D8%B1%D8%A8/blocks osm.org/user/Salim%20the%20Great/blocks osm.org/user/%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D9%86%D8%AA%D8%B5%D8%B1/blocks osm.org/user/%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AC%D8%B2%D8%A7%D8%A6%D8%B1%20%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D8%AD%D8%B1%D9%88%D8%B3%D8%A9%20%D8%A8%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%84%D9%87/blocks
A total of eight accounts were affected: four are already blocked and four are still active. Each time an account is blocked, a new one is created to continue removing tags related to the Tamazight language. He even threatened to exterminate the Amazigh (Berber) people.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172953712?after=172953712#map=13/36.75522/3.15914
Here are some examples: concrete
osm.org/way/231801800/history/25#map=14/36.77914/3.02960
osm.org/way/26002989/history/43
osm.org/way/34281515/history/22
osm.org/node/956228937/history/17#map=19/36.755010/3.224467
osm.org/node/2356776200/history/17#map=19/36.743574/3.172752
osm.org/way/26023452/history/39#map=16/36.78329/3.06039
ilias_ (2025-10-08 11:47:23+00:00): Hi Tnwarrior,

It's funny how some people have nothing better to do in their life than vandalize an open-source collaborative project...

I've also dealt in the past with a banned person that would create a new account each time to evade the ban. The best we can do is monitor the history, and report their new accounts by sending an email to the DWG. They're pretty reactive and do a great job. Simply cite all the past banned accounts and the fact that the user is plainly racist against a whole ethnicity.
bartgron (2025-10-15 17:38:57+00:00): Chłopie coś ty narobił z tymi budynkami...
grzegorz75jan (2025-10-15 18:21:15+00:00): Niesamowite :)
streckenkundler (2025-10-07 19:33:04+00:00): Bitte unterlasse weitere vergleichbare Bearbeitungen! Lass uns erst ein allgemeines Lagebild erarbeiten, was in welches ref gehört!

BITTE!
Tobias Conradi (2025-10-07 20:17:09+00:00): Lagebildbeginn: https://lists.openstreetmap.de/pipermail/berlin/2025-September/001977.html
streckenkundler (2025-10-07 20:22:43+00:00): "Schulterzucken"...

Was will uns Tobias damit sagen... :(

Nochmal... Mailingliste ist der falsche Ort! :(
Tobias Conradi (2025-10-07 20:22:45+00:00): Fortsetzung https://anna.info/wiki/Brandenburg/NSG
Tobias Conradi (2025-10-07 21:10:23+00:00): "Was will uns Tobias damit sagen... :(" - https://community.openstreetmap.org/faq "But remember to criticize ideas, not people."
eggie (2025-10-07 20:45:49+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
ilias_ (2025-10-08 11:49:46+00:00): Hi Cassini, great surveying job in my area! Thanks a lot for the hard work. If you have questions or need info about other areas that I correctly mapped, do not hesitate to send me a message.
NeisBot (2025-10-07 19:23:34+00:00): Hi Ankon10, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 98% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 1 highway(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=172974579
user_5359 (2025-10-15 09:52:27+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/889916461.
What is the mean of the tags
pub_cat = yes
pub_cat:name=Penny
?
Regardless of whether this is a useful entry, 
business:pet=cat 
business:pet:name=Penny
would not be more general?
RedAuburn (2025-10-16 19:41:49+00:00): Excellent point! have changed to that. and i do believe this to be highly valuable tagging as she's a very cute cat
Sylabowy Kot (2025-10-08 09:07:10+00:00): Please put more heart into mapping quality than wasting space in changeset description. 

Reverted because the main OSM basemap is not a place for such a bad solutions: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172993177
Prasanna Msamy (2025-10-15 16:34:30+00:00): Apologies for the mistake I committed. Thank you for the valuable feedback. I look forward to your suggestion/feedback in the future as well.
 Thank you.
user_5359 (2025-10-12 11:15:58+00:00): Hello! May I ask what is the point of including the ISO 3611-3 key if the object is already fully described by ISO 3611-1?

Bonjour ! Peut-on se demander quel est l'intérêt d'inclure la clé ISO3611-3 si l'objet est déjà entièrement décrit par ISO3611-1 ?
JeroenvanderGun (2025-10-13 10:53:47+00:00): Different systems may use different codes from ISO 3166 to refer to this object, hence I included them all. Codes from ISO 3166-3 are unusual but in the case of Metropolitan France, FXFR refers to a territory that still exists present-day rather than a historic territory.
pavelt (2026-01-08 06:37:09+00:00): not arguing about ISO 3611-3 - but updated ISO ISO3166-1  doesn't look correct. 
I believe the correct ISO 3611-1 codes should be FR and FRA
https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:code:3166:FR

The source referenced by you https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:code:3166:FX
explicitly mentions that is not the actual one
"2002-11-22	Deleted; see France (FR, FRA, 250) in ISO 3166-1"
JeroenvanderGun (2026-01-09 00:09:55+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176984051
HellMap (2025-10-22 09:21:31+00:00): Čau,

Divas ēkas gan katrai tribīnei nevajadzētu zīmēt, ja tās kartē kā ēkas, bet tad `building:part` katrai daļai (un ja vajag pārklājoties). Arī sēdvietas turpinās zem jumta nevis tā, ka tribīne beidzas un ir tikai jumts. Ar tik smalku zīmēšanu jābūt uzmanīgi, jo viegli ievadīt nepareizus datus cenšoties iegūt kaut kādu konkrētu renderēšanu. Jo šeit tagad datos divas ēkas un pati tribīne tikai puse no tām.

Es arī ne visai saprotu kāpēc šī daļa https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1436267277 ir roof? Datos tagad sanāk, ka gandrīz visa tribīne ir zem jumta.

Šeit arī vajadzēja gan atstāt iepriekšējos elementus, jo tie 15 gadus jau bija iezīmēti un satur elementu vēsturi. Tagad nākotnē skatoties būs grūtāk saprast, kas tieši te mainījies.
rusjanis (2025-10-23 04:17:19+00:00): Iepriekš vizuāli bija tikai kā jums kas izskatījās kā gaisā karājas.
Tagad : https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=56.9653314&lon=24.2303210&zoom=18&camera.phi=-119.033
rusjanis (2025-10-23 04:23:58+00:00): Es šeit kārtēju ņemot piemēru no ārzemju kolēģiem kas ir profesionāli kartētāji.
HellMap (2025-10-23 09:07:16+00:00): Datiem ir jābūt pareiziem pirmajā vietā. OSM nav tikai karte, OSM ir ģeotelpiska datubāze. Tas nozīmē, ka noteikti nedrīkst mainīt vai likt nepareizus tegus priekš vizualizācijas / renderēšanas, jo tas ietekmē ne tikai renderēšanu, bet pašus datus. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer / https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element

Ja es piemēram gribētu analizēt datus un sameklēt jumtu krāsas Rīgā, tad šeit būs 11 nepareizi elementi, jo kā var zināt, ka redzot datos jumtu, tas nav bijis domāts jumts. Pat ja iepriekš te bija tikai jumts gaisā, tas tik un tā bija pareizāk nekā tagad, jo pirmajā vietā ir pamatelementa kontūra, bet ēkas daļas pēc tam. Kā jau minēju, 3D mikrokartēšana ir sarežģīta un viegli pieļaut kļūdas. 

Ja ārzemju kolēģi šādi kartē, tad tādas izmaiņas ir labojamas vai atceļamas. Es nezinu, ko tieši tu domā ar "profesionāli" - visi OSM dalībnieki ir labprātīgie izņemot organizētu kartēšanas, kuriem ir daudz stingrāki kvalitātes nosacījumi. Bet ļoti daudzi kartētāji tiešām zīmē pārliecināti bet nepareizi gadiem ilgi, jo neviens nav vēl pievērsis uzmanību un izlabojis, bet kartētāju motivācijā priekšroka ir kaut kāda konkrēta vizualizācija nevis datu atbilstība patiesībai. OSM arī nav tik daudz dalībnieku, kas spēj pamanīt un izlabot lietas - tas ir ļoti liels darbs. Pat Latvijā izmaiņu ir pietiekami daudz, ka mēs nevaram apskatīt visas un ļoti daudz kļūdu paiet garām.

Protams šī šeit ir ļoti maza lieta salīdzinot ar daudz ko citu. Kaut kad nākotnē jau to kāds izlabos. Tāpēc es to visu minu drīzāk vispārīgi runājot informācijai nākotnei.
rusjanis (2025-10-23 13:51:06+00:00): Nu jā, savā ziņā tev taisnība. Bet visā pasaulē tūkstošiem kartētāju vizualizē. 
 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/204068874#map=19/51.503353/-0.119503&layers=D

https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=51.5035672&lon=-0.1205988&zoom=18&camera.phi=57.525
rusjanis (2025-10-23 13:57:47+00:00): Tad tīri teorētiski London Eye vajadzētu dzēst? Hmm, es domāju nē, Ir īpaši objekti kuri varētu būt izņēmums, arī manā gadījumā par tribīnēm. Bet varu arī vairāk neturpināt izmantojot nepareizus tagus, jo bija doma Daugavas stadionu skaistu uztaisīt.
HellMap (2025-10-23 14:07:29+00:00): Kapēc dzēst. Šajā piemērā nav salikti `building:part=roof`. Tur ir pareizi `building:part=yes`. Un galvenā "ēka" precīzi ietver visu kontūru. Kā arī nosakošie `tourism=attraction` tegi ir galvenajam elementam nevis tikai daļai.

P.S. Ja to visu precīzi nesaliek, tad arī piemēram sanāks tāds https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=56.9413032&lon=24.0882165&zoom=19&camera.theta=46.719&camera.phi=-3.151
rusjanis (2025-10-23 14:40:40+00:00): Rīgas panorāma rats protams skaists😂.

Ā nu pag, tad ar manas tribīnes jumtiem nav ok, labi, paskatīšos, mēģināšu salikt pareizi visu. ( Tuvākajā laikā).
rusjanis (2025-10-23 14:57:50+00:00): Aplūko šo https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=56.9409994&lon=24.0962026&zoom=18&camera.phi=-77.592
Vismaz šeit man ir pareizi?
HellMap (2025-10-23 15:44:23+00:00): Es tik smalki 3D tegošanu neesmu nekad darījis, man grūti pateikt. It kā elementu galvenie tegi izskatās pareizi. Kontūras, daļas un vērtības it kā ir ok. Sīkāk gan es nepateikšu.

Tu to ar kaut kādu pluginu taisi vai manuāli?
rusjanis (2025-10-23 16:16:36+00:00): Es arī īsti nezināju, bet sāku mācīties 3D tagošanu.
Izmantoju šo https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/urban-eye-3d-josm-3d-viewer-plugin/133674
SomeoneElse (2025-10-08 23:53:19+00:00): Thanks!
NeatNit (2025-10-08 11:50:24+00:00): היי,
תודה על התרומה! החזרתי את השינויים שעשית בכביש: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173000326

השינויים שעשית לא היו מהותיים מדי בכל מקרה.
Jrachi (2025-10-08 07:23:03+00:00): Ciao.
La relazione ha un (probabile errore tra Via Sabaudia e Strada della Viassa.
Cosa intendi con il ruolo route, in alcune way?

Ivo
mtorchiano (2025-10-08 09:04:29+00:00): Ho visto l'errore, l'intersezione non era giusta, c'era un pezzo fuori.

Per il ruolo "route", era un refuso: è la prima volta che creo una route e nei primi pezzi non sapevo cosa mettere.

Risolto entrambi con changeset #: 172993053.

Grazie per i commenti.
Valerio_Bozzolan (2026-06-10 00:18:40+00:00): Ciau! Ho notato il valore "traffic_signals;uncontrolled" per questo attraversamento pedonale:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3939393007

Letteralmente credo significhi "con semaforo, ma senza semaforo". Sono sicuro qui ci sia un semaforo quindi tolgo il secondo valore. Spero di non aver fatto qualcosa di male. Ciaau grazie :)
tuxnux (2025-10-11 03:38:24+00:00): Traffic going north on Rodovia Edenor João Tasca does not enter the roundabout, and so it shouldn't be connected to it.
dcskobuffs (2025-10-13 21:19:57+00:00): Hello tuxnux, thanks for reaching out! 
These edits were made based on painted arrows visible in the cited Vantor Satellite Imagery dated 2025-09-30. Apple has an agreement with Vantor Hub (previously Maxar) to use their more recent imagery to edit OpenStreetMap, which is not publicly available for editing OpenStreetMap. These same arrows are also visible in Both Esri and Bing Imagery as well as Mapillary (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-23.028670549997614&lng=-46.96649926083791&z=19.338685502890893&pKey=1329934344083599&focus=photo&x=0.4826319418509767&y=0.6671409031871967&zoom=0) indicating the road has not since changed. Hopefully this helps clarify why these edits were made, have a nice day!
tuxnux (2025-10-16 01:28:54+00:00): My concern is that traffic going north will now be prompted to 'enter the roundabout then take the first exit' while in reality this traffic does not enter the roundabout. The roundabout is only 1 lane wide and, in a way, acts as an on/off-ramp to the highway. I had it connected to reflect the fact that northbound traffic does not enter the roundabout. I'm familiar with this intersection because I drive there every day.
dcskobuffs (2025-10-17 18:53:49+00:00): I understand your concern about being prompted to enter and exit the rotary junction, as that straight on does appear to act as a bypass. However without any physical separation there should not be any separate ways between the road and it. How would you feel about connecting https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13157366806 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13157366815? That way the connectivity is still there for navigation from those leaving the rotary junction onto Rodovia Edenor João Tasca (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1227241681), but the junction can still be bypassed from those on the that road continuing north. & Thanks for the collaboration on this feature!
eggie (2025-10-07 20:48:29+00:00): Dag Railwayfan,

Wellicht concreet commentaar bij je updates. Dat wordt op prijs gesteld.

MVG
eggie
rskedgell (2025-10-09 00:13:39+00:00): Gates and other barrier nodes shouldn't generally be mapped at intersection nodes. Although the sidewalk way is badly aligned, I doubt that anyone walking along the pavement of Harlington Road West between Clymping Dene and Hounslow Road has to pass through it.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:barrier#How_to_map_barrier_nodes