piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
HellMap (2023-05-27 15:34:43+00:00): One example. Someone added `landuse=reservoir` as a waste water basin in 2012, then `water=wastewater` was introduced around 2013. Now this edit changes it to `water=reservoir`. So, yes, the tag is now worse as it implies the original reservoir designation indeed meant a reservoir and not something else.

Anyway, this kind of discussion is exactly why such edits need to be discussed.
tux67 (2023-05-27 15:51:38+00:00): Fully agee with HellMap ... as a community project we have deleloped guidelines as a result of tons of those discussions. Instead of debating here the time could be spend to set up the Mapcomplete task mentioned or find a solution that widely agreed. .. following the process .
ZeLonewolf (2023-05-27 16:21:39+00:00): Look, some communities are fine with these kinds of edits and some aren't. So when you make a huge edit like this, it will inevitably make a bunch of people mad in a place where they hate bulk editing and cause a revert. I would suggest familiarizing yourself a bit more with OSM culture in that regard and I wish you success in communities that are more amenable to your preferred contribution style.
Carnildo (2023-05-27 18:04:23+00:00): In the United States, the GNIS import (itself a bad idea) brought in many different types of water-storage objects as "landuse=reservoir".  Those need to be properly sorted out, not blindly re-tagged.
DaveF (2023-05-27 18:11:47+00:00): Auto/bot/mechanical edits amend one tag on one type of object. If (& it's a big if) there are amendments to other objects they stand out like sore thumbs. edits are much more likely to be erroneously missed where a contributor changes multiple tags on multiple different objects, even if it's only over a small area.

It's disappointing to see OSM is attracting people who are not really interested in its primary purpose of providing *accurate* data to create maps, but just here to 'manage the process'.

Please remember this anti mass edit ruling was created, in a display of blatant 'do as we say, not as we do' arrogance, by those who oversaw the crap Tiger import in the US & yet couldn't be bothered to fix it.
DaveF (2023-05-27 18:40:16+00:00): @HellMap (and @tux67 & Carnildo)
So, by your own admission Your argument is straw man. *All* of the errors were in existence prior to these edits. These edits created no errors. The only reason you've become aware of these errors & thnk MapComplete is a solution to fixing them is due to edits occurring. Discussing them before hand wouldn't have enlightened you. If there are errors, fix them; instead of moaning about other edits which improve the quality of the OSM database.   

@ZeLonewolf
As the edits haven't created errors, only tidied up deprecated tags that have already been discussed at length, what's your logic for "getting mad"? Communities should assess on quality, not quantity.
ZeLonewolf (2023-05-27 20:24:01+00:00): @DaveF, I live in a pragmatic world where I'm concerned about actually getting stuff done. No amount of whinging on a changeset comment will change the fact that some communities and individuals are heavy on rule-lawyering and perfectionism. With this reality in mind, any edit that will get reverted is a waste of everyone's time. Despite what you seem to imply above, the US is one of the more amenable places to bulk and mechanical editing. However, it still requires a base understanding of community expectations.

I similarly bulk-edited 30,000 or so riverbank tags in the US, with community support and a good understanding of where the data came from and how it came to be. So I am absolutely a fan of bulk and mechanical

See:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Waterways/River_modernization

I largely agree with Carnildo's description of reservoirs tagged from the GNIS import. Tens of thousands of farmer's cow ponds in North America are tagged as reservoirs, and the presence of the old tag gives us something to go off of in sorting these out into "reservoir" and "not reservoir". But, if you've never looked at the data or talked to people who map these areas, you'd never know about them. Merely upgrading the tag makes finding and fixing problem data harder.

Meanwhile, after a brief discussion on the Czech mailing list, every landuse=reservoir in the Czech Republic was upgraded to the new tagging. The Czech mappers understood that no underlying data issue made this problematic.

In the Czech case, it was a quick note on their mailing list, and then the edit a few days later.  In the riverbank case in the US, it was quick notes on Slack once it was clear there was no opposition. Bulk editing doesn't need to be excessively process-driven, but it does need a minimum level of understanding of the data that's being edited and at least a courtesy interaction with the community involved.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-28 22:33:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 136609773, 136639484, 136633089, 136645524, 136654047, 136623452, 136614651, 136672560, 136641952, 136607063, 136663965, 136598791 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed landuse=reservoir edit.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136557861 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7146
SomeoneElse (2023-05-28 22:46:51+00:00): Well, that took a while :)

It'd be great if some of the excellent points above were discussed a but more widely.  Perhaps https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/help-and-support/tagging/71 might be a suitable place?

Also, I'm sure that there's some "low hanging fruit" among the reverted data that "obviously isn't any sort of reservoir".  I've done a couple of the more obvious ones from earlier in the series of series of reverts, but the 394 nodes (including at least one mobile phone shop!_ on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136672560 are surely worth a look.
Best Regards,
Andy

PS:  Other reverts of changes by this user are still ongoing (currently https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136671982 - there will likely be a couple more in that series too), as we have had what might be a record number of separate individual complaints about their edits.
spughetti (2023-05-25 19:56:59+00:00): Extra source

https://www.theartnewspaper.com/2020/06/24/suspected-arson-damages-andy-goldsworthys-spire-in-san-franciscos-presidio-park
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-28 22:33:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 136609773, 136639484, 136633089, 136645524, 136654047, 136623452, 136614651, 136672560, 136641952, 136607063, 136663965, 136598791 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed landuse=reservoir edit.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136557861 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7146
Der Keks (2023-05-25 19:59:50+00:00): please have an eye on that and make sure that i used the editor correctly
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-28 22:33:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 136609773, 136639484, 136633089, 136645524, 136654047, 136623452, 136614651, 136672560, 136641952, 136607063, 136663965, 136598791 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed landuse=reservoir edit.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136557861 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7146
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-28 22:33:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 136609773, 136639484, 136633089, 136645524, 136654047, 136623452, 136614651, 136672560, 136641952, 136607063, 136663965, 136598791 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed landuse=reservoir edit.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136557861 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7146
gscscnd (2024-01-06 08:46:28+00:00): Linkuję do świeżej dyskusji:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4053961
eggie (2023-05-25 20:47:46+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback... We zetten in OSM niet nogmaals het adres op de gebouwomtrek. Er is al een importadresnode.
Ik heb het adres weer verwijderd en deze woningen van 'huis in aanbouw' gehaald.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Tomas Straupis (2023-05-26 08:20:04+00:00): Change reverted. Please do not break tagging without local knowledge.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-28 22:33:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 136609773, 136639484, 136633089, 136645524, 136654047, 136623452, 136614651, 136672560, 136641952, 136607063, 136663965, 136598791 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed landuse=reservoir edit.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136557861 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7146
olo81 (2024-03-19 11:28:12+00:00): Błędne zastosowanie, usunięte 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:place=neighbourhood
silversurfer83 (2023-05-25 21:20:06+00:00): Moin
wenn der Standort stimmt sieht das alles ziemlich gut aus :)

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136558730
PendlerMa (2023-05-27 14:25:25+00:00): Ja, der Standort stimmt von der Position. Das Denkmal steht in der Mitte vor der ersten Stufe der an dieser Stelle ziemlich breiten Treppe.
silversurfer83 (2023-05-27 19:42:45+00:00): 👍🏻

Cheers
Silversurfer83
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-28 22:33:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 136609773, 136639484, 136633089, 136645524, 136654047, 136623452, 136614651, 136672560, 136641952, 136607063, 136663965, 136598791 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed landuse=reservoir edit.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136557861 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7146
riiga (2023-05-25 21:25:50+00:00): Have you discussed this automated edit somewhere? I can't find anything on the Swedish mailing list or community forum.
avinet_ua (2023-05-25 21:28:40+00:00): do we need to discuss fixes? its basics, old tag, and pair of replace for it
riiga (2023-05-25 21:38:05+00:00): Yes, you need to discuss and confirm that the local community supports the changes when doing it on a large scale like this. This is clearly stated on the wiki.

"Under no circumstances should you (semi-)automatically change “deprecated” tags to something else in the database on a large scale without conforming to the automated edits code of conduct. Any such change will be reverted."
avinet_ua (2023-05-25 21:44:52+00:00): maybe, but if this just fix of broken tags (!), nothing bad happens. there are lots of fixes, it is very nice, is not it?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-28 22:33:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 136609773, 136639484, 136633089, 136645524, 136654047, 136623452, 136614651, 136672560, 136641952, 136607063, 136663965, 136598791 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed landuse=reservoir edit.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136557861 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7146
map per (2023-05-28 19:58:17+00:00): Hallo mbklr089,

Der kleine Hofladen war hier schon seit 6 Jahren eingezeichnet, hab den doppelten Eintrag wieder gelöscht.

Viele Grüße
map per
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-28 22:33:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 136609773, 136639484, 136633089, 136645524, 136654047, 136623452, 136614651, 136672560, 136641952, 136607063, 136663965, 136598791 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed landuse=reservoir edit.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136557861 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7146
Rainero (2023-06-28 19:09:09+00:00): Hallo AIBPG,
nach deiner Änderung der Dietrich-Bonhoeffer-Straße von highway=residential auf highway=living_street gibt es nun einen Konflikt mit maxspeed=30. Wie sieht es vor Ort aus, ist die Straße mit Zeichen 325  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Zeichen_325.1_-_Beginn_eines_verkehrsberuhigten_Bereichs,_StVO_2009.svg beschildert? Wenn ja, müsste maxspeed entfernt werden. Wenn aber maxspeed=30 gilt, wäre highway=living_street falsch.

Wäre super, wenn du die Situation aufklären und und die Attribute der Straße korrigieren könntest.

Servus,
Rainer
Mxdanger (2024-05-17 07:37:07+00:00): Reverted by changeset 151439877.

You merged a bus stop with the building.
mga_geo (2023-05-26 05:51:12+00:00): Bonjour,
Suite à vos modifications, de très nombreuses relations route=bus ont leur tracé cassé.
Une modification en cause : les bus ne peuvent plus circuler sur un tronçon de "Avenue Pierre Guéguin".
GeorgeKaplan (2023-06-03 07:31:23+00:00): Bonjour,

En effet, j'ai fait des corrections pour basculer les relations sur la voie nouvellement piste cyclable sur la voie de circulation générale côté est de la chaussée. En revanche, j'ai des doutes sur le fait que les relations étaient correctes avant, je vois par ex la ligne 1 dans ses 2 sens sur les 2 anciennes voies à sens unique.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-28 22:33:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 136609773, 136639484, 136633089, 136645524, 136654047, 136623452, 136614651, 136672560, 136641952, 136607063, 136663965, 136598791 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed landuse=reservoir edit.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136557861 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7146
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-28 22:33:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 136609773, 136639484, 136633089, 136645524, 136654047, 136623452, 136614651, 136672560, 136641952, 136607063, 136663965, 136598791 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed landuse=reservoir edit.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136557861 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7146
lyctkel (2023-09-13 16:57:16+00:00): Hi Display name can't be blank,
Ik ben momenteel bezig met het updaten van de recycling nodes in Nederland voor recycling:pmd. Daarbij kom ik steeds containers tegen waar recycling:glass ten onrechte is gebruikt. Volgens de AVRI-website (https://www.avri.nl/inwoners/afval/afvalinzameling/informatie-over-afvalsoorten/glas/)  wordt niet al het glas in de containers ingezameld. Als je het niet erg vindt, verwijder ik recycling:glass (en ook de andere recycling:XXX=no, aangezien recycling:XXX=no sowieso standaard is) voor https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1002713101
Is dat OK?
Groet,
lyctkel
EindjeFietsen (2023-09-13 17:10:00+00:00): Hi lyctkel, 

Dank voor de opmerking. Het is inderdaad correct dit op no te zetten aangezien het hier inderdaad alleen om flessen en potten gaat. Dit heb ik denk ik over het hoofd gezien. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Drecycling#Accepts

Groet,
...
lyctkel (2023-09-13 18:10:43+00:00): Hi  Display name can't be blank,
Bedankt voor de snelle reparatie.
Groet,
lyctkel
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-28 22:33:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 136609773, 136639484, 136633089, 136645524, 136654047, 136623452, 136614651, 136672560, 136641952, 136607063, 136663965, 136598791 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed landuse=reservoir edit.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136557861 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7146
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-28 22:33:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 136609773, 136639484, 136633089, 136645524, 136654047, 136623452, 136614651, 136672560, 136641952, 136607063, 136663965, 136598791 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed landuse=reservoir edit.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136557861 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7146
i2004 (2023-05-25 21:33:06+00:00): no etiendo lo testimonial
AgusQui (2023-05-25 21:43:48+00:00): Que solo mandan 1 o 2 coches por día para cumplir
nslxndr (2023-06-13 05:41:01+00:00): Szia!

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/312734772
Ez az ÉK-DNy irányú út egy egyirányú, aszfaltozott kerékpárút, ami ennek megfelelően volt is címkézve. Összetévesztetted a kb. 30 m-rel nyugatra lévő, észak-dél irányú, még nem felrajzolt, park körüli úttal és aszerint címkézted át. Vissza javítottam: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137268843
gabro00 (2023-06-13 06:30:04+00:00): Szia!
Valóban tévesztés történt. Mentségemre szóljon átlagban nincs 20 m sem az útszakaszok közt és sötét volt, amikor arra jártam
Köszi a javítást!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-28 22:33:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 136609773, 136639484, 136633089, 136645524, 136654047, 136623452, 136614651, 136672560, 136641952, 136607063, 136663965, 136598791 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed landuse=reservoir edit.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136557861 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7146
Roma Megalopolis (2024-09-12 13:41:36+00:00): Los Angeles Times article on the Magical Park:
 https://www.facebook.com/100064706439366/posts/1009136747919864/
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-28 22:33:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 136609773, 136639484, 136633089, 136645524, 136654047, 136623452, 136614651, 136672560, 136641952, 136607063, 136663965, 136598791 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed landuse=reservoir edit.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136557861 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7146
sorcrosc (2023-05-26 00:29:11+00:00): This is a large scale change witch doesn't seem to follow Automated Edits code of conduct.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dreservoir
"Under no circumstances should you (semi-)automatically change “deprecated” tags to something else in the database on a large scale without conforming to the automated edits code of conduct. Any such change will be reverted."
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct

It's likely that involved elements need reevaluation and retagging but this is not the way to do.
Please revert this one and other similar edits.
avinet_ua (2023-05-26 00:42:11+00:00): this fix a problem, is not it? it really helps. why revert? just "for the rules"?
avinet_ua (2023-05-26 00:42:44+00:00): this is better than before. revert for rules and make worse?
sorcrosc (2023-05-26 00:58:30+00:00): It is the same as before at best.
I don't see any problem that needs such an urgent fix without any inspection.
avinet_ua (2023-05-26 17:10:07+00:00): tag was old and usupported, this fixes for new tags, nothing more. but you are right that discussion maybe needed before
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-28 22:33:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 136609773, 136639484, 136633089, 136645524, 136654047, 136623452, 136614651, 136672560, 136641952, 136607063, 136663965, 136598791 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed landuse=reservoir edit.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136557861 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7146
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-28 22:33:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 136609773, 136639484, 136633089, 136645524, 136654047, 136623452, 136614651, 136672560, 136641952, 136607063, 136663965, 136598791 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed landuse=reservoir edit.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136557861 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7146
Allison P (2023-05-26 02:43:23+00:00): I got a list of every park in Boise and added basic info to all of them. That said, I've never heard of this one before nor seen it.
Jarrardi (2023-05-26 08:53:50+00:00): Hopffgarten? Me neither, honestly, but the city would never lie to us! 😅
https://www.cityofboise.org/departments/parks-and-recreation/parks/hopffgarten-property

I guess Ivywild used to be the name of the shantytown out there. 😲
Jarrardi (2023-05-26 08:55:32+00:00): Thank you so, so crazy much for all the amazing work you do, by the way!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-28 22:33:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 136609773, 136639484, 136633089, 136645524, 136654047, 136623452, 136614651, 136672560, 136641952, 136607063, 136663965, 136598791 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed landuse=reservoir edit.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136557861 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7146
NorthCrab_upload (2023-05-25 21:50:13+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, zamień addr:place na addr:city. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1360889371
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/375451643

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Svalbard (2023-05-26 06:00:47+00:00): Hello avinet_ua, where did you discuss you mechanical edit? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct
Greetings Svalbard
silversurfer83 (2023-05-26 09:42:21+00:00): I guess here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136557861 is already an answer to that question
avinet_ua (2023-05-26 17:13:50+00:00): this was not discussed before as I expected it as straightforward fix
NorthCrab_upload (2023-05-25 21:50:14+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/375450167

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
seattlefyi (2023-05-26 00:18:45+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OSM! The tags added look good! The abbreviations are all expanded correctly. A few tips about the building geometry -- generally should coincide with the building footprint, not the roof outline. After drawing the house outline and assigning the building type in the iD Editor, you can press 'q' or select the building and right-click to get a menu to square up corners which are at nearly 90 degree angles, which is usually correct. Thanks again!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-28 22:33:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 136609773, 136639484, 136633089, 136645524, 136654047, 136623452, 136614651, 136672560, 136641952, 136607063, 136663965, 136598791 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed landuse=reservoir edit.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136557861 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7146
user_5359 (2023-05-28 09:50:05+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10927186044 (one of over four hundert objects). What is the meaning of the foreign tags
ANNCSU_L235_STRADARIO_20230525_ACCESSI_CONFORMI = 34
ANNCSU_L235_STRADARIO_20230525_ACCESSI_NON_CONFORMI = 0
ANNCSU_L235_STRADARIO_20230525_CODICE_COMUNE = L235
ANNCSU_L235_STRADARIO_20230525_DATA_CERTIFICAZIONE = 24/11/2022
ANNCSU_L235_STRADARIO_20230525_DENOM_COMPLETA = SARDEGNA
ANNCSU_L235_STRADARIO_20230525_DENOM_DELIBERA = SARDEGNA
ANNCSU_L235_STRADARIO_20230525_DUG = VIA
ANNCSU_L235_STRADARIO_20230525_PROGR_NAZIONALE = 955075
ANNCSU_L235_STRADARIO_20230525_STATO_ODONIMO = conforme
CODICE_COMUNE = L235
COORDINATA_X = 8.7658470061490696
COORDINATA_Y = 40.512159159203136
ESPONENTE = A
FLAG_VALIDAZIONE = 1
METODO = 9
NUM_INTERNI = 0
PROGR_CIVICO = 11867716
PROGR_NAZIONALE = 955075
PROGR_STRADA = 57
SEZIONE_DI_CENSIMENTO = 8
.
mueschel (2023-05-31 17:53:37+00:00): Apart from the tags mentioned above there seem to be many problems with this import. Address nodes are duplicated and some are located on the wrong side of a road or in the middle of a road. The changeset also doesn't mention the source of these entries. I suggest to revert this edit, so that a clean import of correct data can be done.