piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2025-04-12 20:11:25+00:00): Dag BRW Ed   Wat bedoel je met parkeer gebied. Je veranderde hier alleen adressen. Dat zal niet kloppen.

Ik draai dit even terug.
Wat was je bedoeling?
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=164868557

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-04-12 20:12:45+00:00): reverted by changeset #164871263
BRWmanED (2025-04-12 20:59:22+00:00): Hallo eggie,
In de kaart zag ik mijn aanpassing niet.
Omdat je schreef, "vink het nakijk vakje aan", dacht ik dat ik het opnieuw moest opslaan met dat vinkje erbij.
Vandaar mijn 2e poging.

MVG Ed
eggie (2025-04-12 21:10:47+00:00): Ahhhh....  Je aanpassing zie je vaak pas als je je cache leeg maakt. CTRL-F5

Je kijkt anders naar de oude situatie.
Je browser onthoudt de het oude beeld en laat dat zien.
Hier had je door schuiven met de kaart een adresnode verplaatst en gecombineerd met een andere adresnode.
Schuiven doe je met de linkermuisknop.
Na onbedoelde selectie verschuift dan niet de kaart maar de node.
Een vervcelende eigenschap van editor iD.
Beter JOSM gebruiken. Daar schuif je met de rechter muisknop. 
Groet
eggie
eggie (2025-04-12 21:11:35+00:00): ..  en dit is de laatste stand van zaken een paar weken terug
https://viewer.satellietdataportaal.nl/@52.66056,4.861665,18/?datastrip=20250310_PNEO-03
Michaall99 (2025-04-12 20:01:30+00:00): Cześć, dzięki za edycję! Do oddzielania dni tygodnia przy podawaniu różnych godzin używa się średnika, a nie przecinka. Pozdrawiam!
mcliquid (2025-04-18 12:42:47+00:00): Hi and thank you for your contribution!

Please note for the future: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
BCNorwich (2025-04-13 06:51:34+00:00): Reverted to remove fiction that impacted on existing features.
Famlam (2025-04-12 19:56:07+00:00): Bron survey ontbrak nog
Max1234-ITA (2025-04-17 07:00:50+00:00): Hi there, I've just been valdating this HOT area near Mandalay,and noticed you mapped some buildings by following the roof shapes visible from the aerial photos.

Unfortunately that's not the correct way, since the photos may be taken not perpendicularly or distorted during the geo-referentiation process.

The proper way for mapping buildings is to reproduce their footprint (or try to do so): that's still an approximate mapping, but it assures more precision.

If you need to reproduce square or rectangular shapes, you can draw them approximately and then adjust them with the "Orthogonalize" function of you editor (shortcut is 'Q' in both JOSM and iD).

Thanks for your work, and happy mapping!  :-)
Max
Dodko (2025-04-14 10:06:51+00:00): Pre názvy ulíc v maďarčine používaj značku
name:hu
a v slovenčine má ostať v značke name

For street names in Hungarian use the tag
name:hu
and in Slovak it should remain in the tag 
name
Chriwro (2025-04-12 19:58:17+00:00): *I know 100% to be a primary road.
I made a mistake in the sentence. It should be trunk road at the end.
Allison P (2025-04-22 15:58:11+00:00): Make sure to square buildings after mapping by pressing Q. Afterwards, verify the building shape is still correct if there are any non-right angles.
ColbyTheWorldTraveler (2025-04-23 09:10:36+00:00): I didn't know that was an option. Thanks! I'll start doing that!
trial (2026-02-06 16:37:37+00:00): Bien, tant qu'à faire, sélectionner les objets qui devraient avoir des angles droits et taper Q.
mgerken (2025-04-12 20:24:59+00:00): (von ESRI Luftbild und knowledge)
eggie (2025-04-12 20:46:55+00:00): Dag sven   Dit routeert niet meer. Hoe kom je van noord naar zuid dan op dat fietspad? 
De hoofdrijbaan staat op slot voor fietsers.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-04-12 20:54:05+00:00): Ik beb bicycle:forward=use_sidepath aangepast naar backward..

Nu zal het weer correct routeren.

MVG
eggie
user_16201490 (2025-04-12 20:55:55+00:00): Als je vanaf het noorden van de Strootsweg komt, fiets je via de Strootsweg rechtsaf naar de stoplichten. Je moet dus een klein stukje van de Strootsweg nemen om bij de stoplichten te komen.

Doel van deze verandering was in de hoop de navigatie via de stoplichten te laten lopen, omdat het net iets veiliger fietsen is. Fietsnavigatie pakte regelmatig de oversteek iets verder oost.
eggie (2025-04-12 21:02:09+00:00): Oke, maar dat lukte niet, want de tekenrichting van de weg stond in tegenstelling van wat je eigenlijk zou willen.
Bij bicycle=forward pakt de fietsroutatie het fietspad.
Nu heb ik het bicycle:backward =use_sidepath van gemaakt en zul je als fietser op de hoofdrijbaan blijven en rechtsaf kunnen slaan. 

GrapHopper kan met die tagging uit de voeten.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_bicycle&route=52.218145%2C6.836119%3B52.217519%2C6.836591#map=19/52.217836/6.836396&layers=N

Dus volgende week na update kun je het checken.
Nu gaat het nog verkeerd in de routering.
De tagging is nu oke.
user_16201490 (2025-04-12 21:04:23+00:00): Was niet bekend met die tag/functie. Bedankt voor de correctie.
eggie (2025-04-12 21:04:36+00:00): Elke weg heeft een tekenrichting. (niets te maken met eenrichtingsverkeer overigens)
Vanuit die tekenrichting moet je uitgaan van de restricties die je aanbrengt. Die waren overigens van de voorgaande mapper.
eggie (2025-04-12 21:05:53+00:00): Yep.. en omdat de oneway=yes ontbrak viel het niet op dat de routering niet werkte :)
sampeto (2025-10-05 19:10:29+00:00): Hi CreCrePL,
du hast den Way: 137261977 von Path auf Footway geändert. Warum hast du das getan? Ein Footway ist ein designierter Weg für Fussgänger:innen, Velos werden da nicht geroutet. Dieser Weg ist jedoch auch für Velos gestattet. Ich werde diese Änderung rückgängig machen.
Gruss, sampeto
eggie (2025-04-12 21:18:45+00:00): Dag Koos.. Hoe kan nu een adres veranderen in een ander adres. Je zult dan de bedrijfsinfo hier moeten verwijderen en de adresnode intact moeten laten. Op de nieuwe locatie in een nieuwe changeset voeg je dat het bedrijf toe op de nieuwe adresnode.
Het bedrijf 'floept' niet automatisch naar de nieuwe locatie. 
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=164872582

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-04-12 21:23:11+00:00): Bedrijf verplaatst
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3005552633
Bexhill-OSM (2025-04-14 18:42:51+00:00): Ah very nice... I did start this, but you must have a more automated way of tagging :)
philipcullen (2025-04-20 00:05:09+00:00): I have a few tools to help adding UPRNs (which I do mean to make generally available at some point - if my small server can cope). I start with a custom tile layer layer in JOSM with UPRN points to check they match up to buildings, then a script in JOSM to conservatively match items in the current viewport to UPRNs. I have a mapcss theme to show items with a UPRN to see the impact. I then add less obvious items (mostly street UPRNs and UPRNs linked to large areas) by hand. I then check back to the original tile layer, to see what may be missing.
tttnnn24 (2025-06-21 12:59:25+00:00): goh eggie, dat je die zag. Schoonzusje en broer van mij...
eggie (2025-06-21 13:07:44+00:00): Teun.  .. De wereld is klein..
Groet..
eggie
mueschel (2025-04-16 10:13:30+00:00): Hi,
you used this tag on two stone:
"inscription:direction_east"
I think this should either be
inscription:E  or direction_east, but not a combination of both. It's highly unlikely that any tool will be able to interpret this tag.
DeFra85 (2025-04-20 11:18:47+00:00): Oh okay, thanks for the tip. I will correct
Udarian (2025-04-12 21:32:45+00:00): at Leonard Usina Hall of Science at MDC Kendall
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-28 18:39:24+00:00): Hello!

You used
motor_vehicle=noc
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/6100324/history

Have you maybe meant
motor_vehicle=no
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
Ponderosopine (2026-03-02 05:44:27+00:00): Sorry, completely missed this message! I see that the bot fixed it. Thanks for taking care of that annoying typo for me.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-03-02 09:53:58+00:00): glad that it was confirmed to be a valid fix!
infeeeee (2025-04-14 06:35:17+00:00): Szia!

Facebook oldalak címét nem a website hanem contact:facebook mezőben tároljuk. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:contact:facebook

További jó térképezést!
Bence_ (2025-04-14 10:57:24+00:00): Szia,

Köszi szépen, javítottam
ChrissW-R1 (2025-04-12 22:16:56+00:00): https://osm.org/note/4633111
rempshaener (2025-04-13 18:00:51+00:00): Hallo,

du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Es gibt keine klare Vorgabe, ob straßenbegleitende Wege als eigener way erfasst werden oder nicht.
Wenn – wie in diesem Fall – statt einem sidewalk=separate ein sidewalk=both gesetzt ist, wäre die minimalinvasive Korrektur eine Anpassung des Tags, nicht das Löschen der Geometrien.
Ich schlage vor, dass du eine Anpassungen zurücknimmst.

Bei Fragen bitte melden.
Viele Grüße
Staerk105 (2025-04-13 18:38:51+00:00): Hi,
danke für die schnelle Rückmeldung. Ich gebe noch etwas Kontext :
Die grundsätzliche Diskussion über die Frage nach separaten Gehwegen hatte ich mir kurz vergegenwärtigt.
Im vorliegenden Fall ist es so, dass die Gehwege wirklich direkt an der Straße sind, (s. Luftbilder) ich wohne hier. Daher wäre sidewalk = separate nicht zutreffend.
Ich wundere mich, dass diese Gehweggeometrie vor ca 2 Monaten eingeführt wurde. Dies soll durch meine Änderung rückgängig gemacht werden.
Ich denke, an dieser Stelle entspricht dies der Empfehlung im Wiki zu Bürgersteigen.

Danke & Gruß
rempshaener (2025-04-14 19:14:12+00:00): Hallo,

ich vermute, du hast dich hier https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Gehsteig durch das Wiki gequält?
Wie dort beschrieben ist, sind die beiden Hauptvarianten verbreitet und existieren nebeneinander. Ich selbst z.B. lege bei einfacher Trennung durch Bordsteinkanten keine separaten ways an, dafür ist mir persönlich der Aufwand einfach zu hoch. Trotzdem lösche ich sie nicht, wenn sie mir begegnen bzw. korrigiere auch Fehler sowohl an den den Haupt-, als auch an den Neben-ways.
Du schreibst, dass das “neue” Mapping bei dir erst kürzlich eingeführt wurde. Auch wenn es anstrengend ist: kommentiere doch die entsprechenden Changesets und versuche, den/die Mapper von deiner Meinung zu überzeugen (was sicherlich schwierig ist - siehe oben) bzw. weise darauf hin, dass bei Ergänzung separater ways das Tagging des Haupt-way anzupassen ist.

Viele Grüße
Staerk105 (2025-04-14 19:56:38+00:00): Hi,
danke dir für die hilfreiche Antwort. Genauso hab ichs gemacht, habe Änderungssatz von vor 2 Monaten kommentiert.
Gruß
rskedgell (2025-04-13 09:36:20+00:00): Unfortunately, using your own preferred format for prow_ref breaks things like https://osm.mathmos.net/prow/progress/essex/uttlesford/great-dunmow/
rskedgell (2025-04-13 12:07:07+00:00): Apologies, I see you expanded the abbreviation in ref=*, not prow_ref=*
trigpoint (2025-04-13 12:28:27+00:00): Although the ref tag should only be used if signed on the ground, which is very unusual.
Cheers Phil
Taya_S (2025-04-14 12:12:24+00:00): Reverted classification change vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164936227
Javierpf (2025-06-19 17:45:35+00:00): Thank you for contributing :-). Your changeset crosses many regions.
In the future, please retain your changeset as smaller (local). Let reviewers and other mappers check your edit more easily. It's impossible (almost) to keep track of the database and changes if changes in huge areas.
So I kindly ask you, when you edit, retain your changeset in a particular smaller area -such as towns- save it first and then move to another area. Examples:
You are adding/modifying 10 objects in 2 distant cities => make 2 changesets, 1 per city.
Why? Have a look at this wiki: osm.wiki/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, and have a nice day. Happy mapping!
JSR1781 (2025-06-14 17:38:38+00:00): Why place one in south america and taiwan, your gonna span the whole earth!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164877285
Fizzie-DWG (2025-06-15 06:17:01+00:00): Unfortunately, when you are fixing incorrect worldwide mapping, there's always going to be side-effects :-(
democat (2025-07-11 01:36:25+00:00): Why does this line have no other tags besides name? Also, the only source I can find for this is https://www.elections.ca/map_02.aspx?lang=e&p=06_ON&t=/1Dis/35010&d=35010, of which the existing boundary seems to already use: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18576232
aharvey (2025-12-18 04:35:43+00:00): Hope it's okay I deleted the construction cycleway https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1377140432/history and replaced it with https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1459444640 with segregated=yes since the path is now open and doesn't have any physical separation between the foot and cycle parts, just paint (unless they are planning on adding physical separation later)
❤️‍🔥 (2025-12-20 02:36:24+00:00): thanks! yeah the eastern side seemed to be open already on thursday morning, with no physical separation

the only thing is: how we tag the difference surface? footpath is concrete or bricks, and the cycleway is asphalt
aharvey (2025-12-20 04:46:07+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:surface#Surface_for_footways_and_cycleways has an example of a segregated shared path, footway:surface=* + cycleway:surface=*
❤️‍🔥 (2025-12-20 11:30:14+00:00): thanks! sorry i missed that very last sentance somehow. done now: https://osm.org/changeset/176176211
MxxCon (2025-04-14 20:51:40+00:00): Hello.
Is "2016" actually part of the name of this feature or just a date when it was created?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164878389
Andrew Ross (2025-04-14 22:47:13+00:00): I believe it's part of the sculpture's name. Go to https://www.tomfruin.com/index.html , search for "Watertower 5" and compare its name with the names of his other works, some that have the year and some that don't.
AndrewS (2025-04-13 06:08:18+00:00): Okay, I've caused a relations problem on the 'natural wood' boundary for this whole area. I know where it is (around Massey State Forest) but haven't pinned down the cause yet. I will repair, unless someone else spots the problem. 
Andrew (sorry).
AndrewS (2025-04-13 12:03:42+00:00): Accidentally deleted a Natural Wood / Massey Creek SF boundary.
Corrected in Changeset #164878604
Frans S (2025-04-22 08:20:12+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping
Check here how high buildings ought to be mapped.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1z7uDwYm4oNmlexHIhJxGCjPpNhCQAgRia5aEJr_4MwM/edit?usp=sharing

You can also load the mapbox imagery for this project 18571. this image is showing the area from straight above. 
Check the alignment to the other imagery first.
It shows the buildings hidden in the shadow as well.

Best regards and keep mapping
MelancholicSlav (2025-04-13 05:41:55+00:00): Can you explain how you are deriving the Persian names of places in Vietnam? Is there a source you are using?
NFZANMNIM (2025-04-13 06:02:20+00:00): unfortunately there's really no Persian sources in existence on vietnam, at most there's tourist websites covering Phu Quoc Island, Hanoi, Saigon... I am doing a systematic and consistent transliteration into Persian (including some judgements to match Vietnamese phonology. For example "An Giang". Since Vietnamese is derived from Portuguese/Western-Europe, the second syllable, it's pronounced not as гянг, but as джанг (if you can read Cyrillic). so I've transliterated accordingly. Generally i simplified complex sounds that don't extent in Persian, following what's done on Persian Wikipedia. For example whenever there's the "nh" anywhere, I simply wrote as "n", or "th" as "t".
SomeoneElse (2025-04-13 08:20:52+00:00): Hello - please do not make up names by transliteration in this way. Only map names that actually exist.
If a data consumer wants to transliterate names, they can.
NFZANMNIM (2025-04-13 09:39:29+00:00): I don't agree, most (almost all) of the relationships I am updating, have Korean names written in the same way by other users (systematic and simple transliteration). Many of these places have Chinese inputs too, not from external sources but from cross-checking characters (done by other users).
Persian Wikipedia also utilizes this way, for Vietnam and for Korea, China, Kazakhstan, elsewhere in the world.
SomeoneElse (2025-04-13 13:11:27+00:00): @NFZANMNIM What some wikipedia project does is irrelevant here.  In fact, many data projects do link to wikidata's various language names via wikidata links - that is a perfectly sensible approach.

The OSM wiki is clear: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Transliteration .
There are a couple of languages (such as Punjabi) where there are multiple orthographies for the same words - in those cases, and in only those cases, transliteration makes sense - both versions are real, local names.
What Korean names have to do with Persian names in Vietnam I have no idea.
NFZANMNIM (2025-04-14 04:29:47+00:00): my point with korean was that i am not doing something new and unique. i'm doing what korean language users have done in updating the information in this area, for persian.
Minh Nguyen (2025-11-28 05:20:59+00:00): Every language has its longstanding conventions. Vietnam and Korea have a shared linguistic heritage as part of the Sinosphere. Transcriptions between the CJKV orthographies are normal, expected, and standardized – not an ad hoc guess by someone sitting in an armchair halfway around the world. I have no idea what the usual practice is among Persian speakers, but Korean is totally irrelevant, and by bringing it up you’re casting doubt on whether you know what you’re doing.
blef (2025-04-13 17:18:29+00:00): Parking des Berges = man_made tower ?????
blef (2025-04-13 17:28:04+00:00): Attention, vous avez déplacé un nœud du chemin (1272216028) en plein milieu de la ville de Dax!
rarad74 (2025-04-13 06:22:40+00:00): Salut.
Nu este corect sa pui in numele cladirii - Blocuri inclusiv scara si apartamentele. Pentru scari exista tag dedicat entrance/exit. te rog sterge-le si pune-le conform regulamentului. In plus, la cautare pe harta nu o sa poti vedea toata denumirea, sau va fi greu de citit atatea nume lungi unul langa altul.
one_electro_dan (2025-04-13 23:29:46+00:00): Salut. Mulțumesc pentru feedback.

Am pus numărul apartamentelor în numele clădirii mai mult temporar până când găseam o modalitate mai bună. 

Am inceput sa mut numărul scărilor și numărul apartamentelor pe ,,intrare" așa cum ai spus tu.

Însă dacă numărul scării dispare din numele clădirii denumirile blocurilor vor fi identice. De exemplu numele ,,Blocul 1 Scara A" și ,,Blocul 1 Scara B" vor deveni ,,Blocul 1" și ,,Blocul 1". 

Deci să înțeleg că întreg blocul ar trebui sa fie un singur ,,apartment", iar diferența dintre ,,scări" să se facă numai pe ,,entrance"?
rarad74 (2025-04-14 06:03:30+00:00): Da, scarile sa fie puse ca nod pe cladire cu o denumire cat mai succinta gen Sc.A sau doar A, sau Sc.1 sau 1. In denumirea blocului trebuie pus doar Bl. X de exemplu. Ca sa fie cat mai simplu de vazut  si gasit. Daca are si numar de adresa, ala trebuie pus la tagul de adresa. Daca nu exista si numar de adresa, atunci denumirea blocului poti sa o pui si la adresa, nu doar la name. Dar in cazul adresei, trebuie trecuta si strada de care apartine la addr:street. O zi buna.
Glassman (2025-04-13 18:11:51+00:00): I looks like you added the same restaurant to two different nodes. I'd suggest just keeping the one the business uses as their address even though they may occupy both.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164880374
ZekOwney (2025-04-14 07:49:47+00:00): Bonjour,

Pourquoi avoir modifié les tracés et supprimé des maisons, alors que tout était clairement visible sur la vue aérienne la plus récente (BD ortho IGN) ?

https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=164880658#17/49.05470/-0.31303
la colle (2025-04-14 08:46:03+00:00): Bonjour,
la vue photographies aérienne IGN n'est pas à jour. Merci de vérifier avec la vue cadastrale qui est elle à jour.
Un nouveau quartier est en construction.
ZekOwney (2025-04-14 09:51:57+00:00): La consultation sur ID montre que le cadastre est bien à jour (extension vers le sud, aka phase 3 du projet) mais n'est pas à sa place sur la commune (décalage vers l'est).
L'ortho IGN et ESRI sont bien à jour. (les autres vues aériennes montrent des champs, on ne peut pas faire mieux comme contraste) et les voiries sont clairement visibles.
la colle (2025-04-14 10:10:22+00:00): Effectivement la vue IGN depuis l'éditeur en ligne n'est pas la même par rapport à JOSM. Je regarde pour faire un revert et remettre mes autres modifs ce soir.
Je vais regarder pourquoi j'ai cette diff entre JOSM et Id
ZekOwney (2025-04-14 10:16:56+00:00): Merci beaucoup :)
Pour ma part je tâcherai de compléter via un passage sur place (streetcomplete et everydoor) à l'occasion.
la colle (2025-04-14 16:50:46+00:00): Je viens de faire les revert, pas le temps de redessiner les gments manquants avec mes traces GPs, je verrais ce WE.
Allison P (2025-04-13 06:59:34+00:00): Is there a sign explicitly forbidding bicycles and pedestrians on this road?
ColbyTheWorldTraveler (2025-04-13 07:26:40+00:00): There isn't, though in person, it's more than obvious that the road is designated only for cars and the greenbelt for other users. Is there a better way to tag that for such a case?
Allison P (2025-04-13 07:31:38+00:00): discouraged, although the tag is controversial since it is subjective. I don't think you need to tag the road at all.
ColbyTheWorldTraveler (2025-04-13 07:38:05+00:00): Noted, though there is a little part of my brain that gets annoyed by routing applications insisting on using the road when the path explicitly made for cyclists is right there.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-16 08:00:42+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12751793731/history has fixme:type = parking that was added in this edit
Is it a parking for cars? (amenity=parking)
for bicycles? (amenity=bicycle_parking)
Something else?
Grégoire Seux (2025-04-16 08:39:40+00:00): fixed
rskedgell (2025-04-13 09:31:58+00:00): Although the iD editor you're using provides drop down boxes suggesting that all the access values should be filled in, that really isn't necessary here. That's not your fault, it's poor design.

If you have a highway=footway, that implies access of foot=yes + (everything else)=no

Adding access=yes to highways is usually wrong, as it means that all modes of transport have a legal right to use that highway. More specific access tags override that, so the (otherwise unnecessary) motor_vehicle=no takes precedence.  The horse="not specified" and bicycle="not specified" tags will likely be ignored by routing software, as "not specified" won't be understood by routing software and access=yes might take precedence.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
rskedgell (2025-04-13 12:02:42+00:00): Thanks for fixing this. PSV gets misused a lot as a synonym for bus+taxi, but doesn't mean that in the UK.

I've made a few other tweaks, as that section of Station Road/Poplar Road had acquired some "interesting" tagging over the last 10 years. Some of it may have made sense at the time, others like highway=living_street look a lot like tagging for the renderer. This shouldn't have any impact on you as bus=yes is still there, but please let me know if you notice any problems.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164891122
eggie (2025-04-13 07:45:38+00:00): Hoi Lean..

Volgens mij hoort de juiste tag bollard=fixed te zijn.. en niet unremovable.

Groet..
eggie
eggie (2025-04-13 07:47:23+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bollard