piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
rimeraz (2025-08-18 21:38:39+00:00): Hi kitsee,

Thank you so much for asking.

When I've been there on 2025-07-26, there was a barrier south of the two viewpoints south of Sgwd Uchaf Clun Gwyn. It blocked the way further south and did not look temporary. That's why I added that barrier and marked the path as not accessible. There was also a (also not temporary looking) sign that said that this path was not accessible.

Instead we had to go east and follow the Four Falls Trail further down south.

However there was no barrier or sign where the blocked path meets Four Falls Trail again. So if you came from the south, the path might have been accessible.

If you could walk it and there was no barrier (anymore) then your information is more recent than mine. Just revert my change.
kitsee (2025-08-18 22:07:37+00:00): Hi, Thanks for reply. 

There are what I would describe as cycle barriers on either end of the path. That is two fences that overlap but with a large gap for a person to pass. I would interpret the barriers as discouraging the path but not blocking it. I've readded the path since it is still well formed and not blocked on either side along with my most recent update. 

I did consider adding access=discouraged but since there is only "cycle barriers" and no formal signage to discouraging it I've left the access tag it out but I've mapped it as a path with a higher sac_scale value to contrast the main paths which I've mapped as footpaths and a 0 sac_scale value for the most part. 

I didn't notice a sign but i will admit i wasnt looking for one. i also encounted a closed path with a diversion near the south. i've just added it but i didnt put down a gps marker for it and cant 100% remember where it is so i've made a rough guess on its location. i do plan to go back up there to explore more so i'll fix it in the future
Fizzie-DWG (2025-08-18 05:59:53+00:00): DWG revert - vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170596283
Baloo Uriza (2025-08-20 13:46:14+00:00): Are you sure?  This pole appears to be about as dead-center to an existing driveway as one could get.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170579432
ptravadactyl (2025-08-20 16:29:53+00:00): Updated.  Was set using Every Door and must have either been off on the imagery.
limes11 (2025-08-17 19:34:34+00:00): Moin, 

es gibt hier bereits ein fixme, bitte nicht noch einen fast gleichlautenden Hinweis am gleichen Objekt.

Es ist kein ausgewiesener Wanderweg und nicht auf offiziellen Karten. access=no wurde gesetzt, da der Weg in einem Naturschutzgebiet liegt.

Viele Grüße
dzamper (2025-11-09 22:45:32+00:00): Co dokładnie się kryje pod pojęciem „poprawa”? Bo po pobieżnym przejrzeniu zmian w tym zestawie wygląda jakby poprawnie otagowany parking oraz obszary `amenity=parking_space` (którymi można oznaczyć kilka miejsc na raz) zostały usunięte i w zamian dodane ponownie jako parkingi przydrożne. Jeśli tak to znaczy że tagowanie przed zmianami było poprawniejsze i niepotrzebnie zatracono historię obiektów…
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-07-11 16:39:56+00:00): http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=170580327 - no, zepsuto parking
eggie (2025-08-17 18:59:18+00:00): Dag Jos,

Hier is wel heel veel verkeerd gegaan.
Dat komt door schuiven met de kaart in editmodus.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=170581278

Wegen die prive zijn hoef je overigens niet te verwijderen. Die kun je voorzien van access=private.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-08-17 19:04:00+00:00): Een track is een veldweg.  Dat hoef je niet om te zetten naar highway=service..

Op oprijlaan kan wel een highway=service zijn met de extra tag service=driveway

Die paden door de akkers kun je gewoon als track taggen.
eggie (2025-08-17 19:05:28+00:00): Je verplaatst ook onbedoeld objecten.. zoals een adres Klepperheide 2C
eggie (2025-08-17 19:10:08+00:00): adres en boom teruggeplaatst.. Voetpad dat over de bebouwing lag teruggelegd. 

Kijk nog eens naar die highway=service. Eigenlijk bedoel voor parkeerplaatsen en bv een weg over een benzinestation. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-08-17 19:21:12+00:00): De oude tagging van de veldwegen teruggezet.. en een (bewust?) verwijderd pad van de voorgaande mapper teruggezet.
Dat pad over die fietsenstalling bij de school omgezet naar highway=path. Dat zal geen officieel fietspad zijn. 
Misschien roept de concierge wel Afstappen!
Overleg indien mogelijk met de voorgaande mapper Ernie C als je zijn wegen wil verwijderen.

Alle begin is moeilijk.
groet
eggie
Jos Hebing (2025-08-20 19:14:52+00:00): Ja, denk dat er wat dingen inderdaad verkeerd zijn gegaan door het schuiven. Is er een betere manier om dat te doen? Ik wilde namelijk de parkeerplaats bij klepperheide 2 intekenen (daar woon in) maar ik kwam er al snel achter dat het in de browser moeilijk is
eggie (2025-08-20 19:34:55+00:00): Goed inzoomen dan zie je beter wat je doet.
Dat onbedoeld verplaatsen komt omdat je iets per abuis geselecteerd hebt.
Selecteren doe je met de linkermuisknop...maar schuiven ook.
Op het moment dat je de kaart verschuift en die kaart schuift niet mee dan gebeurt dit.
Ik gebruik editor josm. Daar selecteer je met de linker muisknop en schuif met de kaart met de rechter.
Je kunt volgens mij de kaart ook verschuiven met de pijltjestoetsen.
Tja.. het lijkt allemaal zo simpel.. maar alles vergt oefening... en dan gaat het maar een keer fout.
Wanneer je overstapt naar josm ben je van dit soort gedoe af.
Mapse..
eggie
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-24 17:27:38+00:00): reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410  and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969  remain not answered

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173728754
Vít Hnilica (2025-08-17 18:49:25+00:00): fix: path to Mukhadze:)
XsCode (2025-08-17 19:37:23+00:00): It's a Firetrap I think?
TheUKHighStreet (2025-08-17 22:06:01+00:00): Thanks -  I've just updated but looking again at the photo, I think there is an RES in the middle of the name?
TheUKHighStreet (2025-08-17 22:10:50+00:00): Found it.
https://uk.representclo.com/pages/represent-retail-store-manchester
kagebar (2025-08-25 17:22:10+00:00): альтанка посеред дороги знаходиться? чи чому на дорозі її приліпили?
MOHAMEDHAMLV (2025-08-17 21:47:08+00:00): #MOHAMEDHAMLV
MOHAMEDHAMLV (2025-08-17 21:47:22+00:00): #MOHAMED
Jordi MF (2025-08-17 19:06:41+00:00): Error en el comentari. S'han afegit edificis i zona de granja del Mas de la Vall
あじさか (2025-08-18 00:16:31+00:00): Hello, I often pass by this place.
There is no permanent building here.
What you mapped is a temporary rest hut/prefabricated structure for the Aira Bypass construction.
I'm not sure if it should be mapped as a permanent building.
Tsu-Yi Su (2025-08-18 06:09:01+00:00): Hi, 
Noted, thank you for the information.
Please invalidate task and I will update accordingly.
Thanks again!
mueschel (2025-08-18 08:46:37+00:00): Hallo,
schau bitte nochmal über die Edits, 5 Wege haben nur fremde Tags die nicht in OSM gehören, z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1422893750
gnlpfth (2025-08-18 18:49:17+00:00): Hi,
die betroffenen Wege sind korrigiert. Danke für den Hinweis!
limes11 (2025-08-17 19:45:35+00:00): Moin, 

das wurde gerade erst vor ein paar Tagen geändert. 

Kannst Du kurz erklären, welches Problem vorliegt ?

Falls es um Routing ins Kreuzgäßchen geht, ich denke, das ist so gewünscht. Was hier vielmehr fehlt, sind die access-tags auf den anschließenden Wegen. (Kann man auf g*****-Streetview grob erkennen, aber keine Details.)

Viele Grüße
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2025-08-20 11:39:06+00:00): Merhaba. Uydu görüntülerinde Karaman Caddesi'nin ortasında fiziki bir engel(refüj gibi) görünmüyor.  Fiziki olarak ayrılmamış yollar, yol sınıfı fark etmeksizin tek yol şeklinde çizilmeli. Arada refüj vb. fiziki bir engel varsa lütfen yazınız, eğer fiziki engel yoksa değişikliğinizin düzeltilmesi gerekiyor.
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2025-08-20 11:40:15+00:00): Şu park yolunu neden sildiniz? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1206127544
user_5359 (2025-08-18 19:11:19+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2a6j. What is the mean of the tag bgt_id = d373a5? Is this a local ref  id?
emvee (2025-08-18 20:31:01+00:00): No, it is some way of documenting that this changeset is using BGT data, see also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/nieuw-experiment-bgt2osm/134103
user_5359 (2025-08-19 05:05:22+00:00): Currently, there are 483 occurrences ref:bgt:id and your 49 bgt_id.
cquest (2025-08-19 12:30:24+00:00): Hello snail044 !

Be careful with large landuse multipolygons... you broke one by removing its outer way.

I just fixed it.
snail044 (2025-08-19 17:18:41+00:00): Hello cquest,
thanks for your help! It happend when I added an area with inner relation and I don't know why. From that moment on I considered how to get the forest area back.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-09 09:58:36+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13076483879/history has flag:type = commercial that was added in this edit
what was meant by flag:type=commercial ? How it differs from flag:type=advertising ?
lipuma (2025-08-24 16:25:43+00:00): Super bedankt voor het toevoegen/aanvullen van die afvalcontainers. Ik vind het altijd vervelend om uit te zoeken welke tags ik nou moet gebruiken. Die bij de Oude Dreef wilde ik al een tijdje doen maar had er nog geen tijd voor gehad.
Lejun (2025-08-18 05:33:44+00:00): Salut et bienvenue sur OSM ! J'ai bien vu ta contribution et je te propose de l'améliorer. En général on évite d'utiliser la clé `name` pour y coller une description de l'élément, `Compost` dans ce cas précis. À la place tu peux le remplacer par l'attribut `recycling:organic=yes` pour que ça apparaisse sur les cartes.
lionfish16 (2025-08-18 06:00:32+00:00): Ja,  alles dicht gemacht
NieWnen (2025-09-14 14:00:05+00:00): Podtrzymywanie historii jest ważne. Podmieniamy geometrię istniejących bez usuwaniach ich, więc nie usuwaj obiektów, żeby je ponownie dodać, skoro to jedno kliknięcie w porządnym edytorze, żeby taką geometrię podmienić.

Tagowanie obszarowe taxiway jest uznawane jako niepoprawne wg wiki w dodatku tutaj to duplikat i na wiki w dyskusjach zalecają używać tagu area:aeroway.

Poprawiłem powyższe i przywróciłem poprzednie obiekty dla zachowania historii.
ika-chan! (2025-08-18 07:26:26+00:00): I advise that you need to leave a better changeset comment than just a full stop, because without one people will have to guess what you were changing, and then there would be an increased risk of people mistaking your changesets for a bad edit. The latter is because we are currently dealing with a different user who is making bad or fictional edits, and evading blocks and questions from the community by using many sockpuppet accounts.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170585258
ItsEgo (2025-08-18 07:31:30+00:00): Ok, thank you! Just did this for the sake of time management, but will provide more information on the upcoming adds or changes. Best wishes!
Sylabowy Kot (2025-08-18 08:42:23+00:00): Mapuj w zakresie lokalnym, a nie tak jak tutaj po kilka domków wgłąb paru państw. Dodatkowo pisz normalne opisy zmian, zwłaszcza dla tak dużych obszarów: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian

Coś takiego jak tutaj: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/112924731 nic nie mówi. Trzeba się domyślać, że chodzi o skrócenie nazwy miasta, a to, że zmiana jest w obrębie miasta, to widać. Opis zmian powinien brzmieć tak, by zmniejszać potrzebę wchodzenia w zmienione w niej dane, by dowiedzieć się, co zaszło, a taki zły tylko zwraca na siebie negatywnie uwagę.
HellMap (2025-12-12 18:29:30+00:00): Please do not use AI tools if you are not going to properly review the edits. Here you added a duplicate building https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1422915906 . Here buildings are overlapping https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1422915888 . This is clearly only half a building https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1422915886 . This building overlaps a fence https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1422915894 . This way is drawn through a fence and over grass https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1422915909 . And other issues. Please fix these errors and others in the changeset and any other changesets that used AI tools.
eggie (2025-08-18 07:10:26+00:00): Welkom bij OSM,

Het is beter om de vermeldingen op de gebouwen te plaatsen.
Een B@B wordt getagd met 
tourism=guest_house
guest_house=bed_and_breakfast

Ik zal de vermeldingen in ieder geval op het gebouw plaatsen.
MVG
eggie
kapazao (2025-08-21 10:51:30+00:00): Hola, ya se te ha baneado varias veces por este tipo de ediciones y se te han explicado los motivos.

Algunos usuarios estamos intentando corregir la zona, pero insistes en añadir elementos que no existen, rompes lo que ya hemos corregido y está claro que no comprendes la forma de editar correctamente.

Por favor este es un mapa serio y no un lugar para pasar el rato. Generas graves problemas a otras personas con ediciones mal hechas y falseadas.

Si tienes interés en contribuir positivamente comienza leyendo la wiki de OSM (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:España) y solo haz cosas sencillas que entiendas bien cómo hacer y en conjuntos de cambios pequeños. También puedes dejar notas con la capa de notas (https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/37.39839/-1.94604&layers=N)

Espero que lo tengas en consideración y no continúes con este tipo de ediciones.

Un saludo
eggie (2025-08-18 13:47:57+00:00): Dag Skeed .. Ik heb je info samengevoegd met de BAG adresnode.
Daar stond wel de naam, maar alleen een naam doet niets in OSM. 
MVG
eggie
Skeed (2025-08-19 22:53:32+00:00): Ah check! Ja zolang deze plek te vinden is voor anderen vind ik het allemaal best! Thanks :)!
b-jazz (2025-08-17 21:17:04+00:00): jerk!
HellMap (2025-12-04 16:37:24+00:00): Te maxspeed pielikās administratīvajai robežai https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/74158162 :) Iesaku iD izslēgt robežu slāni, lai netraucē, jo tas tik un tā importēts un to gandrīz nekad nav jāaiztiek.
mueschel (2025-08-18 08:44:40+00:00): Hallo,
die Tags an einem "charge_point" sollten keinen "charge_point"-Präfix haben:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:man_made%3Dcharge_point

Außerdem gibt es keinen "socket:ccs", das wird wahrscheinlich "socket:type2_combo" sein.
mariotomo (2025-08-18 05:14:30+00:00): Hola. Voy a borrar este elemento. Si necesitas hacer prácticas, por favor explica tus motivaciones, intentaré ofrecerte sugerencias.
mariotomo (2025-08-18 05:16:38+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170595078
Frans S (2025-08-18 09:13:49+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please square each rectangular building with the Q key while it is still selected. 
Don't ignore the warnings on the issue triangle, and solve them before uploading your mappings.
Best regards and keep mapping
Jakaka2222 (2025-08-17 21:43:24+00:00): Bron vergeten sorry: Satellietportaal, PDOK luchtfoto, ontwerp
OddlyAngled (2025-08-19 15:19:22+00:00): for meadow restoration consider using the `closed:highway` lifecycle prefix and/or tagging access=no. the old trail will show up on satellite and gps heatmaps for many years and often get mapped as new trails again and again when they are deleted.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170587849
mueschel (2025-08-19 18:13:09+00:00): I managed to compress the opening hours into one tag by reusing the time spans common on each day :)
Agaric (2025-08-21 06:09:40+00:00): Thanks. 
What tool did you use for that??
mueschel (2025-08-21 06:44:44+00:00): I just used the usual reference tool to check the results

https://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/
NorthCrab_upload (2025-08-17 22:00:55+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1422923137
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1422923138

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2025-08-17 22:11:10+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1422923137
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1422923138

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
MassCartog (2025-08-18 02:33:54+00:00): Hello, thanks for leaving a changeset comment. The features you removed in this changeset are valid. Please don’t remove valid OSM data.

You might not be aware, On OSM, we do not removed features if they exist on the ground. If it exists on the ground, it is valid data regardless of a feature being public or private, designated or informal/illegal/unauthorized. Removing them is actually considered vandalism.

It's clear that these features exist, and not being public access areas is an invalid reason to remove data from OSM. So this edit is incorrect and damaging to valid OSM data.

The correct way to handle this is to use OSM's tagging system. access=private is appropriate if they are closed to the public. This has now been done, and services that do use OSM data will reflect that and specify their access. It takes time to see these changes reflect on other services. If you still have an issue with what other services do with OSM data, you can follow up with them about their policies. 

Please read this for more info:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won't_delete_roads_on_private_property

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F
TrickyFoxy (2025-08-27 17:06:52+00:00): Если это не единственный магазин, то его нужно добавлять отдельно, а не на всё здание
Hans Thompson (2025-08-18 16:12:18+00:00): nice details!
jhuang97 (2025-08-18 05:42:23+00:00): Hello. In this changeset you appeared to have added the tag building=house to relations 10322762, 12037189, and 2807121, which are train routes between Chicago and New York.  I don't think that makes sense so I have deleted those tags in changeset 170595740.
HellMap (2025-08-24 17:29:13+00:00): Please actually fix issues with the roads that you add using Rapid, which is your responsibility if using semi-automated tools. You left the road with an incorrect layer value, overlapping buildings, overlapping a wall, impossible geometry, misaligned.
salma_z (2025-08-19 08:38:57+00:00): Hello ABDULLAH AL WERFALLI,
Thank you for your contribution to improving the road network on OpenStreetMap.
I noticed in this changeset:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170590862
 That you changed some roads to “operational”. I tried to double-check if these roads were officially opened, but I couldn’t find any confirmation in the news. The only source I came across is this one:
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DNAsJhxS9TF/
 which says the project is still in its final construction stage.
 Maybe you have another source that confirms the opening? If so, it would be great if you could share it with us.
Also, I saw that you updated a few links:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1413587390
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/172855266
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1413587388
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1413587386
from trunk_link to primary_link. Just to mention, according to OSM guidelines, the link classification should usually match the higher road type it connects to. Here’s the reference for more details:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Link_roads_between_different_highways_types
Best regards.
salma_z
user_5359 (2025-08-18 06:40:15+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You can divide the railway and add a life cycle prefix (my interpretation of pipped off) to the corrected part.

Please visit our wiki at osm.wiki with a huge railway section.
user_5359 (2025-08-18 06:35:30+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on  https://www.osm.org/node/13076859598. What is the mean of the tag "railway feature" = "Four Mile Run". 

Please visit our wiki at https://wiki.osm.org with a huge railway section.
bpaulson75fb (2026-01-21 19:45:16+00:00): This is likely not an ALPR. its not listed in the locations for the mandated reporting to the BCA.
TrickyFoxy (2025-08-18 20:51:06+00:00): Магазин в лесу?
marksnso (2025-08-19 04:31:18+00:00): Нет, видимо на ходу не правильно навел плюсик, вот точные координаты магазина
54.59942, 83.319265
TrickyFoxy (2025-08-19 10:05:30+00:00): Спасибо, исправил
user_5359 (2025-08-18 06:31:23+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on  https://www.osm.org/node/4335856113. You change the cuisine value from sandwich to mexican. Have you seen the shop, or is this just a correction based on general knowledge? In the first case, you can also delete the key fixme:atp.
user_5359 (2025-08-18 06:25:19+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have reverted your SPAM entry.
buy_osmand (2025-08-18 05:26:42+00:00): 😳👍 Good,
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170592297
user_5359 (2025-08-18 06:25:07+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have reverted your SPAM entry.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-08-23 00:12:42+00:00): Please also see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18646
Frans S (2025-08-18 09:25:44+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
You did a great job on this task, however, you often mapped both the front side and the roof as a building.
You know how to map multi story buildings, I have seen, but this method is also to be used at buildings where you see both a sidewall and the roof. 

Check here how high buildings ought to be mapped.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1z7uDwYm4oNmlexHIhJxGCjPpNhCQAgRia5aEJr_4MwM/edit?usp=sharing

Or check this footage:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/13RTwH7sChRWrG5bIjysF2ripBgh3F5l4/view?usp=drive_links
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2025-08-18 09:27:45+00:00): Hello again. Forget my comment about the roof/front mapping.
My Offset was incorrect.
Best regards
taki3hira (2025-08-20 01:30:09+00:00): Thank you for the easy-to-understand video. I'll use it as reference for future mapping.
eggie (2025-08-18 07:20:57+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback BECIS stond al op de kaart. Ik heb één vermelding verwijderd.

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
TrickyFoxy (2025-12-11 09:36:19+00:00): And why did you add it when there is https://osm.org/relation/6725906?
buy_osmand (2025-08-18 04:33:44+00:00): Based on this reviewed changeset, I, presume that corporate Grab applications are not providing the following software support as citation: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:restriction=no%20u%20turn?uselang=en#:~:text=Even%20if%20a%20U%2Dturn%20restriction%20relation%20is%20missing%2C%20a%20typical%20routing%20engine%20tries%20to%20avoid%20sending%20the%20user%20on%20a%20U%2Dturn%2C

Thereby, requiring their paid corporate persons to thoroughly apply `restriction=no_u_turn` relations on every non-intersection roads. Please do feel free to correct my statement.

ٱلسَّلَامُ عَلَيْكُمْ, 
as-salāmu ʿalaykum,
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170593529
buy_osmand (2025-08-18 04:44:45+00:00): Public correction on the presumption paragraph 2: "Thereby, requiring their paid corporate persons to thoroughly apply `restriction=no_u_turn` relations on >> every road intersection <<. Please do feel free to correct my statement."