piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2025-05-13 15:07:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
mavl (2025-05-13 15:04:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
mavl (2025-05-13 15:04:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
NeisBot (2024-12-10 04:20:38+00:00): Hi Geoff_Amos, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 99% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 2 highway(s)
- 1 building(s)
- 8 natural(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=160114403
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-12-10 04:49:08+00:00): Thank you for the contribution.
Do you know what the plans are for redevelopment?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160114403
Geoff_Amos (2024-12-10 04:52:44+00:00): Thank you for the review.
The two buildings and the two water bodies at the southern end near Imlah Court still exist. These can remain.
I'm not sure what highways were deleted?
The remaining edits can all be deleted as the former golf course has closed and cleared and is currently being redeveloped for housing.
TheSwavu (2024-12-10 07:28:53+00:00): Hi Geoff,

The highways would have been the cart paths that got deleted.
mavl (2025-05-13 15:04:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
mavl (2025-05-13 15:06:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
uᴉʍOꓨ (2025-02-14 06:58:10+00:00): Hi there. What are you trying to convey exactly, with these tags motor_vehicle=no + motorcar=yes ?
uᴉʍOꓨ (2025-02-14 06:59:52+00:00): Also, what do you mean by "2W not allowed" in your changeset comment, and what image are you referring to?
GrabPHChristian (2025-02-17 07:09:11+00:00): Based on imagery, no entry for 2W vehicles (motorcycles). Cars are able to pass through.
uᴉʍOꓨ (2025-02-18 04:08:40+00:00): Thank you for the response.

By the way, the meaning of 
motor_vehicle=no + motor_car=yes is an all encompassing restriction for vehicles (including bicycles, HGVs, trucks and buses) except cars, not just motorcycles.

If you're specifically restrictict just "2W" vehicles, the tag is actually motorcycle=no.

Details are available from our Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Amotorcycle

If you have any questions or concerns, feel free to reach out to the local community channels: https://osm.org/wiki/PH
rempshaener (2024-12-11 18:46:15+00:00): siehe Hinweis bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160167227
mavl (2025-05-13 15:08:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
mavl (2025-05-13 15:04:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
mavl (2025-05-13 15:08:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
mavl (2025-05-13 15:05:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-05 03:33:47+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12408821339/history has vending_machine = excrement_bags that was added in this edit
Is it just less-used duplicate of vending=excrement_bags ?
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:amenity%253Dvending_machine

Is there any reason to not change to more widely used key?
llamborda (2026-02-08 12:06:15+00:00): Hi Mateusz. Thanks for your comment. I was not aware the best practice/most used tag for such an element is "vending = extrement_bags". I'm going to change it now. Thanks for pointing this out.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-10 09:54:33+00:00): thanks!

have a nice day, and thanks for mapping this in the first place!
mavl (2024-12-10 13:22:09+00:00): Здравствуйте. Подскажите, пожалуйста, зачем вы удаляете существующие объекты? Например:  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1165914979/history  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1168912712/history
GlobalScan (2024-12-11 06:59:09+00:00): Здравствуйте, mavl. Удаленные объекты заменил на аналогичные, с более детальной прорисовкой. Реки и ручьи со множеством точек было проще отрисовать заново, чем править существующие.
mavl (2024-12-11 08:03:34+00:00): В OSM объекты удаляют, если только они не существуют. Иначе их редактируют.  
  
Есть правило "Если что-то следует исправить, то это нужно именно исправлять, а не удалять и рисовать заново, так как история правок объекта бывает важна для различных целей."  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A5%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%88%D0%B8%D0%B9_%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BB%D1%8C
GlobalScan (2024-12-11 08:20:14+00:00): Ок.
RubenKelevra (2024-12-10 16:29:55+00:00): Thanks!
trial (2025-09-27 08:10:12+00:00): I don't know what you changed and why, but I can tell you that some features previouly apparently weel tagged are now useless like https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/241873873 : fee=yes;no!
trial (2025-09-27 08:10:36+00:00): I meant *well*
mavOsaure (2025-10-13 22:02:42+00:00): Bonjour, 
Si tu veux réexaminer le changeset qui posait problème, tu peux aller voir ici:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=160078048.
Merci de ton ré-examen. Je te laisse corriger l'erreur détectée! ;-)
Bonne soirée.
trial (2025-10-13 22:09:51+00:00): Bonsoir, je vois que https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/241873873#map=19/47.080749/2.398803 est toujours problématique :
il y a d'un côté un parking (payant) et de l'autre une station de pompage gratuit (dans le parking).
trial (2025-10-13 22:11:26+00:00): amenity=parking
fee=yes
service:bicycle:pump=yes
si tu veux n'avoir qu'un objet.
mavOsaure (2025-10-13 22:20:24+00:00): Merci de ta proposition: ça parait une bonne solution en attendant qu'un contributeur hypermotivé mappe le parking souterrain complet!
EneaSuper (2024-12-10 10:04:18+00:00): Ciao Caster89, come mai hai mappato gli edifici dell'area ex Mira Lanza? Sono ormai stati demoliti da tempo.
Caster89 (2024-12-10 10:54:49+00:00): Hai ragione scusa le immagini di referenza che avevo erano di un paio di anni fa e non erano ancora stato tutti demoliti
EneaSuper (2024-12-10 11:25:01+00:00): Bene, immaginavo fosse per via delle immagini satellitari; ho anche visto che hai già corretto, quindi bene così 🙂

Grazie e buon lavoro ❤️
Caster89 (2024-12-10 13:25:49+00:00): Grazie a te. Cercherò di fare un po più di attenzione sulle zone ce non visito quotidianamente
NorthCrab_upload (2024-12-10 08:00:55+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1341477888

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
pkn (2024-12-10 10:15:15+00:00): Hi Mond00,
du hast in Bochum einige Sparkassenstandorte mit 	brand=Rheinhessen Sparkasse eingetragen. Bist du dir da sicher, dass das so korrekt ist?
Gruß Peter
Mond00 (2024-12-10 13:23:10+00:00): das stimmt leider nicht. Achte sonst darauf das die Werte stimmen. 
Liegt es hier vielleicht am Operator = Sparkasse GS Rotthausen das der Brand dann sich falsch ergab? Bei den verbleibenden Werte werde ich nun aufpassen.
Jrachi (2024-12-12 10:07:08+00:00): Ciao.
Perché metti il ruolo route su alcune way?
Non ha nessun significato!

Ivo
skquinn (2024-12-10 10:22:58+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Please note the following for future edits:

1. description=* is not for advertising copy. This is considered spam and has been removed.
2. opening_hours=* follows a specific format as documented on the wiki at <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/> and is not free form text.
3. addr:street=* is for the street name only. The number goes in addr:housenumber=* and a unit/suite goes in addr:unit=*. See the updated tags.
4. The correct tag for postal code is addr:postcode=* not zipcode=*.
Yog Sot (2024-12-10 19:55:20+00:00): w sumie tych use side_path mozna by spokojnie usunąć wincej na pewno na tarczy skrzyżowania, bo to akurat logiczne, ze skoro jest skrzyzowanie, to nie ma rowerówki, bo została odwołana ;d
Rodrigo Rega (2024-12-14 21:37:11+00:00): Buenas.

Tal y como estaba antes (landuse=residential) estaba correcto. Nograro ya estaba mapeado con un nodo place=hamlet. Si quieres saber más sobre el uso de landuse=residential puedes echar un ojo en https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:landuse%3Dresidential

Voy a proceder a corregirlo.

Un saludo y gracias por tus aportes a OSM.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160119307
Rodrigo Rega (2024-12-14 21:37:47+00:00): Reverted.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160292601
jeslop (2024-12-17 15:38:31+00:00): Hola Beinart13. Mira esto por favor: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres#Nombre_es_solo_el_nombre
Los nombres "Licencia para recolecta de setas" o "Txoko del pueblo" no parecen ser realmente el nombre de esos lugares. 

Lo corrijo.

Saludos,

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
citrula (2024-12-10 15:30:09+00:00): addr:state should be the two-letter postal code ("TX", in this case). What issue are you trying to solve with this edit?
ValidDistress (2024-12-29 10:52:36+00:00): Gelieve een sluiting niet zomaar in de naam te zetten. Dit is immers niet onderdeel van de naam. Je kan hiervoor bv. was: of disused: gebruiken (zie de OSM wiki). Is er ook een nieuwe locatie die je kan toevoegen?
eggie (2024-12-10 11:11:40+00:00): Dag vinger,

Waarom zou deze openbare parkeerplaats plots priveterrein zijn?
MVG
eggie
DGerveno (2024-12-23 10:42:48+00:00): Buenas. Con qué criterio has pasado la carretera N-330a de tertiary a secondary?
DGerveno (2024-12-23 10:44:13+00:00): Y añado: con qué criterio has reclasificado todas las carreteras de la zona?
alexsup21 (2024-12-11 09:27:14+00:00): Cześć, mam pytanie co do zmniejszenia dokładności drogi (skrzyżowanie Kellera z 16 Dywizji). Czy linia (way) nie powinna podąrzać środkiem jezdni?
Marek-M (2024-12-11 10:10:09+00:00): Cześć, linia `highway` nie musi a nawet często nie przebiega środkiem jezdni. Przy nieregularnych kształtach skrzyżowań dróg utrzymanie linii na środku jezdni jest wręcz niemożliwe. Tego typu linia symbolizuje w uproszczony sposób drogi tak, aby aplikacje routingu/nawigacji uzyskały jednoznaczną informację o zbliżającym się skrzyżowaniu dróg.

Nieprawidłowe, zbyt łagodne kąty na skrzyżowaniach `highway` zamiast konkretnej informacji 'skręć w lewo' generują komunikaty w stylu 'trzymaj się lewej strony'
alexsup21 (2024-12-12 16:15:36+00:00): Aha, to ma sens, dzięki za wyjaśnienie :)
mavl (2025-05-13 15:07:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
yrtimiD (2024-12-10 13:29:25+00:00): Hi, bollard in the middle of the road means that vehicles can't pass in both direction. Is this the real case here?
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-12-14 04:45:32+00:00): This does not exist.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160120766
farhadGuli (2024-12-14 09:47:16+00:00): bro , its under construction project , i added , just like floor plans , and they started sketching roads in real life in there
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160120766
farhadGuli (2024-12-14 09:47:40+00:00): bro , its under construction project , i added , just like floor plans , and they started sketching roads in real life in there
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160120766
augxcgrwxo (2024-12-10 12:10:38+00:00): Я вижу, что исправления верные, но было бы корректно правки разбить на пакеты меньшей площади покрытия по земле.
literan (2024-12-10 17:12:53+00:00): поддерживаю, а то лезет в список наблюдения
Stalker61 (2024-12-10 18:19:05+00:00): Есть такое дело, лопухнулся. Сори.
Stalker61 (2024-12-10 18:28:16+00:00): Сейчас исправим через откат.
Stalker61 (2024-12-10 18:31:45+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160140098
eggie (2024-12-10 16:01:09+00:00): Hi De Gunner,

Weshalb 'Barfußpfad' auf Deutsch hier?
Heisst das hier wirklich so?
Gruss,
eggie
eggie (2024-12-11 13:06:56+00:00): Ich habe den Namen Barfußpfad gelöscht.
Gr eggie
Der Gunner (2024-12-11 14:51:10+00:00): Es ist als Barfußpfad ausgeschildert gewesen, ist aber kein offizieller Straßenname.
eggie (2024-12-11 15:01:46+00:00): Hallo. Dann füge es vielleicht als loc_name hinzu. 
Aber wirklich auf Deutsch... nicht Blotevoetenpad? 😀
Gruß

eggie
eggie (2024-12-10 11:14:46+00:00): Dag Vinger. Dit lijkt me gewoon een openbare parkeermogelijkheid.
Je hebt hier ook nog een parkeerplaats op een hoekpunt getagd.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-12-10 11:17:04+00:00): Ik heb private verwijderd.
Wat is hier dan veranderd dat je er niet mag parkeren?
MVG
eggie
Oskarst_ (2024-12-17 14:46:09+00:00): Hei, hva er det du mener må gjøres?
Mr Turq (2024-12-17 15:07:36+00:00): Hei!
Dette er en enkel sti, kjempefin og av lett teknisk karakter. Bør være blå med highlight. Jeg har aldri skjønt hvordan man fikser det selv. Kanskje du kan hjelpe? :)
Oskarst_ (2024-12-17 15:24:53+00:00): Ikke sikker på om jeg forstår hva du mener, er blå farge med highlight en type markering av vanskelighetsgrad i en annen karttjeneste?
Mr Turq (2024-12-18 15:15:40+00:00): Dette er en fin sti som bør være blå og ha gul glow. Ja, vi snakker om mtbmap sitt kart, ikke sant? Er det jeg som surrer her? :)
Oskarst_ (2024-12-20 09:15:19+00:00): Dette her er OpenStreetMap, og mtbmaps bruker OSM som kilde til stiene sine. Ser mtbmaps har en lenke til å redigere OpenStreetMap, kanskje der forvirringen kommer fra! Mtbmaps har valgt å vise vanskelighetsgrad på stier med highlights i ulike farger, men for at de skal dukke opp må de aller først ha en angitt vanskelighetsgrad i OSM. Det kan se ut til at stien må ha mtb:scale = 1 for å bli blå. 

Ser du har gjort en del redigeringer her:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/177381092/history

Andre brukere av OSM følger vanligvis ikke med på alle endringer som gjøres i kartet, noe som forklarer hvorfor du ikke har fått noe svar på dine endringer. Merk at OSM brukes av svært mange aktører til veldig mye forskjellig!
kapazao (2024-12-12 12:27:20+00:00): Hola, varios en Sevilla ha incluido cambios que no parecen ser correctos en Huétor Tájar, como por ejemplo https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1341496007 que se ha cambiado a sendero y parece ser un camino o vía de acceso privada. Por otra parte ha quedado descolgada de la red viaria y no sirve para nada puesto que no se puede acceder de ninguna forma a esta.
¿Podrías corregirlo?
Un saludo
kapazao (2025-03-04 21:04:19+00:00): Ya lo he corregido, gracias...
eggie (2024-12-10 11:23:36+00:00): Waarom zou een woonerf opeens access=private zijn?
Gelst dit wellicht alleen voor ,motorvoertuigen? Welke bebording staat hier? 
MVG
eggie
DOKmartijn (2024-12-10 15:44:16+00:00): Hi Eggie,

Het is een eigen terrein (semi-openbaar), bij de inrit staat een bord 'Eigen terrein, verboden te parkeren'. access=private leek me daarom passend.
Groet,
Martijn
eggie (2024-12-10 15:49:25+00:00): Dag Martijn,

E
eggie (2024-12-10 15:52:30+00:00): Eigen Terrein betekent niet verboden Toegang. Je kunt wel access=permissive gebruiken.
Wel handig voor bezorgdiensten.. Dan routeert het gewoon.
Wanneer je niet mag parkeren wil het niet zeggen dat je er niet mag rijden.
In dit geval dus access=permissive gebruiken. Op evt parkeervakken kun je wel access=private zetten.
Wanneer er een bordje art 461 wvs staat kun je wel access=private taggen.
Bedankt voor je reactie,
eggie
DOKmartijn (2024-12-10 15:58:06+00:00): Dank voor de toelichting. Art 461 wvs staat erbij op het bord. 
Groet,
Martijn
eggie (2024-12-10 16:02:57+00:00): Oke....   Ik heb hier niets aan de accesstags veranderd. Wel het leisure=park verwijderd. 

Up to you..

Groet
eggie
DOKmartijn (2024-12-10 16:06:13+00:00): Dank. Ik zal hem aanpassen naar access=permissive, denk dat dit beter past. Leisure=park verwijderd lijkt me prima zo.
Groet,
Martijn
eggie (2024-12-10 11:21:59+00:00): Dag DOK martijn,
Ik heb de leisure=park hier verwijderd. Dit lijkt me geen park.
Waarom is een officieel woonerf een prriveterrein?

MVG
eggie
DOKmartijn (2024-12-10 15:51:06+00:00): De gemeente heeft aan het binnenterrein de bestemming 'Groen' toegekend. Dit is een openbaar toegankelijke tuin, echter is het hele terrein priveterrein
eggie (2024-12-10 15:56:23+00:00): Oke, maar een leisure=park wordt in een andere context gebruikt. Bv zoiets als het Van Bergen IJzendoornpark. (Grotere gebieden) 
Dat losse deken over landuse en water heen. 
Wanneer hier gemeentegroen ligt kun je gewoon de landuse invullen.
Bv natural=shrubbery of landuse=grass.. 

Op nodes bomen natural=tree ..
Up to you. 
Groet
eggie
SekeRob repair (2024-12-11 09:04:10+00:00): Hi,

Your remapped highway=cycleway=lane is same problem as before, invalid mapping/tagging. If you like to see the cycleways already mapped and rendered visit the openstreetmap  website and select layers Y (CycleOSM) and C (Cycle Map) to see them. Sometimes it has a day delay before new ones show as the maps are not refreshed continuously.

As sample view. Cycleways tagged on a road are directly affixed to the side of the road and are dashed lines blue. Cycleways mapped separately will show as individual ways that follow their own way and are solid blue. An example
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160122232#map=20/42.7268387/13.9847495&layers=Y

Names generally go on the route relations, not on the road segments it self if directly parellel to the road. Here you see they carry the tag BI-6 since they are officially part of the Ciclovia Adriatica 6, also known as Bice Italia 6.

Ciao
habi (2024-12-10 10:18:07+00:00): Revertiert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160122942
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-14 12:39:56+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1341501813/history has building = proposed that was added in this edit
Is this building existing now? Are there at least real plans for building it? If there are no serious plans for it - that should be entirely deleted. If construction started then building=construction is a better tag. If construction is upcoming then source for this claim should be tagged on the geometry itself (source tag, note tag) and different tagging should be used - we are mapping proposed features in OpenStreetMap very sparingly, not every promise or business plan should be mapped here.
mavl (2025-05-13 15:03:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
Piskvor (2024-12-10 11:17:29+00:00): Dobrý den,

děkuji za upřesnění - nemínil jsem to nijak zle, jen jsem právě nedávno v Kolovratech na nádraží byl a rozcestníku si vůbec nevšiml. Děkuji i za zmapování trasy.

Mapování zdar,
Piškvor
Ketiv (2024-12-10 12:44:47+00:00): Děkuji za komentář,
podle vašeho profilu usuzuji, že máte s mapováním v OSM velké zkušenosti. Až bude trasa domapovaná, můžete se prosím podívat, zda má správně všechny formality (tagy)? Případně mi poslat komentář, co je třeba opravit?
Předem děkuji.
Ketiv
Piskvor (2024-12-10 13:18:19+00:00): Určitě se na to rád kouknu, díky moc.

Napadá mě, nemáte třeba vyfocené ty rozcestníky na trase? Hodily by se do projektu Fody (vzešlého z OSM), který se snaží zdokumentovat jejich vzhled v terénu, viz třeba tady mapa: https://openstreetmap.cz/#map=16/49.9852/14.5845&layers=mKGB

Tady je pár příkladů takových fotek: https://openstreetmap.cz/git/tom.k/Fody/wiki/AddingPhotos
Ketiv (2024-12-12 22:57:31+00:00): Konečně jsem se dnes dostal k domapování modré značky. Je hotová. Jinak mám fotky všech rozcestníků (kromě Čestlic - tam mám název, ale část směrovek mi chybí), ale trochu mě odrazuje, že jde nahrát jen fotka se všemi údaji EXIF z mobilu. Ohledně své digitální stopy jsem trochu paranoidní. ;-) Zatím jsem tam tedy žádné fotky nenahrál.
Zdraví
Ketiv
VA00 (2025-11-20 12:08:00+00:00): To raczej jakiś podjazd mógłby ewentualnie być. Pytanie na ile zasadne jest w ogóle trzymanie tego typu detali drogi zaproponowanej ponad 10 lat temu.  I tak docelowo będzie to inaczej wyglądało. Jedna kreska wystarczy.
redd (2024-12-10 10:46:17+00:00): löst https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4529962
Jose Luis Infante (2024-12-17 23:54:58+00:00): Gracias por tu edición, y sobretodo gracias por editar en la zona de la DANA, aunque lamentablemente he tenido que revertir los cambios ya que has modificado incorrectamente 5 vías.
Respecto a los edificios, tienes la opción de mapearlos con la capa del Catastro de fondo. Hacerlo con la imagen es más complicado y bastante impreciso.
En la zona hay varias tareas de la comunidad de OSM para mapear edificios, que han recogido los datos del Catastro para facilitar el mapeado.
Mi recomendación es que sigas mapeando, sobretodo por tu zona, la que conoces, y que vayas conociendo las herramientas.
Si lo necesitas tienes una comunidad de colaboradores que te pueden ayudar.
Un saludo!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160123566