piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
maraf24 (2024-02-08 23:02:03+00:00): Błędne zmiany, wykonane na podstawie starego zdjęcia lotniczego.
maraf24 (2024-02-08 23:06:44+00:00): Oraz na "oko". Trawa wchodzi na kilka metrów na chodniki.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2024-05-21 14:17:27+00:00): mudanças revertidas
Glassman (2024-02-02 19:34:48+00:00): Thanks for adding the ballot drop box location. Much needed.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146833425
eggie (2024-01-29 20:10:27+00:00): Dag Dennis,

Ik heb de persoonlijke info, de naam schuur en het adres verwijderd.
Dat zijn eigenlijk zaken die niet in OSM horen.
Good practice    

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Good_practice 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-01-29 20:16:00+00:00): A detached house, a free-standing residential building usually housing a single family. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:house%3Ddetached
Klopt dat wel? 
Groet
eggie
eggie (2024-01-29 20:19:16+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:levels#Example

Het schuine dak telt niet mee bij building:levels  Kijk even in de wiki..
Gr eggie
dennis wensink (2024-01-29 21:18:55+00:00): Op de bovenste etage is een slaapkamer en een dak opbouw het vald onder woonruimte. Van daar. De schuur in de tuin is een vaste houten schuur waar een vergunning voor nodig was. Deze stond al een langere tijd ingetekend.
Wat betreft de persoonlijke gegevens. Deze had ik ingevuld om dat hier ruimte voor was met specifieke fakjes. 

Bedankt voor het controleren en je opmerkingen.
eggie (2024-01-29 21:38:08+00:00): Ahh...  Wanneer iets een schuur is kun je building shed gebruiken.  Je hoeft geen naam toe te voegen schuur.
Die building:levels had ik al aangepast met een roof:level, maar up to you om het weer aan te passen.
Met privezaken 'moet' je voorzichtig zijn. De hele wereld kijkt mee. 
Wanneer het huis een naam heeft kun je dat toevoegen, maar niet de naam van de bewoners.
Bij bedrijven ligt het weer anders.
De woningen heb ik uitgelijnd mbv de BAG.. Een schuin genomen  luchtfoto kun je niet goed gebruiken daarvoor. 
Mapse verder
eggie
woodpeck_repair (2024-01-29 18:37:55+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 146719746, 146719871, 146825118, 146825390.
woodpeck_repair (2024-01-29 18:39:13+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 146827125.
Probelnijs (2024-01-30 08:27:38+00:00): Hi VLD549, I don't think we normally include the name of the town in the name of the bus stop itself. As you changed the name of the bus stop from 'Geitenbergweg' to 'Geitenbergweg, Dieren' on node 3864725065 as part of this change set.
VLD549 (2024-03-06 15:57:16+00:00): Hi,
Thank you for your comment.
Well, I am not a professional mapper, but I can imagine that there are more 'geitenbergweg'-en in The Netherlands :) so I presume it should be mentioned. Certainly because the site mentions it. Is there a way or a person you can check this with?

Thank you in advance.
A67-A67 (2024-03-25 22:07:13+00:00): The placename shouldn't be included in Dutch bus stop names. The site you're using probably shows the bus stop name and the placename together.

I'll revert this incorrect edit.
user_17290217 (2024-01-30 15:41:05+00:00): Sehr geehrter Besucher. Leider hat die OpenStreetMap Foundation deren gesamtes Budget für OpenStreetMap im Jahr 2024 für eine Schiffsladung an SSD Flash Drives ausgegeben. Aufgrund der aktuellen Internationalen Situation, sitzt nun diese Lieferung auf einem Containerschiff am Kap der guten Hoffnung in Südafrika fest. Um Speicherplatz zu sparen, lagert daher woodpeck_repair vorübergehend Changeset´s auf seinen USB Stick aus. Du kannst auf diese Daten über den Editor JOSM und dem Reverter Plugin zugreifen, und ganz einfach reaktivieren. Mit etwas Geschick sollte das auch für ungeübte OpenStreetMap Anwender kein Problem darstellen.
Das entsprechende Changeset findest Du hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/woodpeck
gscholz (2024-02-08 07:28:14+00:00): Hi r0x,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-58.26466&lat=6.04434&zoom=18&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=146834520

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
r0x (2024-02-08 09:50:01+00:00): Hello Guido, 
Thanks for pointing this out. I've made marked the obvious points that are junctions.
The 3 on the top right of your observation though not sure why they're flagging.
Please let me know if you need me to make further changes. 
Many thanks,
Rowan
gscholz (2024-02-08 12:54:41+00:00): Hi Rowan,
thanks for your quick response. You can check for your errors yourself. The OSM inspector view is updated once per day at about 00:00 h GMT. 
Guido
Glassman (2024-01-31 20:00:06+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.

I would recommend leaving the address as a node when removing buildings or areas. In many cases the county reuses the address for new construction.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146834703
aploese (2024-03-10 11:25:58+00:00): Hallo,
die Wasenweilerstrasse ist ab Lilientalweg in Richtung Ihringen ebenfalls mit lcn=yes bis kurz vor Ihringen getaggt. Das scheint mir etwas zu viel zu sein.
Hier ist es deutlich zu sehen: https://cycling.waymarkedtrails.org/#?map=15.0/48.0475/7.661 .
JanB27 (2024-03-10 13:39:20+00:00): Mahlzeit, hab das lcn rausgenommen. Ist ja ohnehin nicht korrekt, hab das bei meinen Änderungen nicht gemerkt und verändert gehabt.
cielak42 (2024-01-29 22:53:15+00:00): A czy mogę spytać jakich dokładnie zdjęć lotniczych używasz? :-) Zgaduję, że (wbrew oznaczeniu) to chyba nie jest geoportal, bo na najnowszych dostępnych tam zdjęciach nie widać jeszcze np. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1244179868 czy https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1244179867 ... - a sam chętnie używałbym nowszego źródła, jeśli takie jest dostępne.
Adam Haba (2024-01-29 22:56:58+00:00): Korzystałem z filmiku na YouTube z przejazdem linią nr.18, wykonanego jeszcze w zeszłym roku.
cielak42 (2024-01-29 23:21:21+00:00): O kurka, w takim razie podziwiam staranność i poziom szczegółowości. Dobra robota.
Adam Haba (2024-01-29 23:23:45+00:00): Dziękuję :)
maraf24 (2024-02-08 23:15:15+00:00): Do takich edycji nie korzysta się z YouTube'a, bo to jest źródło niedozwolone, chyba że sam jesteś autorem tego filmu lub dostałeś zgodę od autora.
Do takich szczegółów korzysta się z BDOT500, bardzo dobrze działa we Wrocławiu i jest legalne. Przynajmniej w JOSM.
silversurfer83 (2024-01-29 21:56:57+00:00): Hi :)
Du hast darum gebeten, dass sich jemand diese Änderung ansieht. Es ist ziemlich dem Zufall überlassen, wer das macht und heute hast du mich erwischt. Also hier ist mein Feedback (nicht wertend, einfach nur als Information für dich, was ich anders machen würde bzw was gut ist):


Fangen wir mit dem Gebäude (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/125838041) an: 
Dies war als "appartments" getaggt und du hast "commercial" daraus gemacht. Ich hab mal in die vorhandenen Straßenbilder geguckt und würde sagen "apartments" oder vielleicht "office" ist da die beste Wahl. Warum? "building=*" beschreibt, was es für ein Gebäudetyp ist. Wofür wurde es gebaut. Wenn sich das ändert kann die aktuelle Nutzung in "building:use=*" angegeben werden. Details liefert das Wiki unter https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Geb%C3%A4ude

Next: Point Of Interest (POI) Details:
gut erfasst. Etagen, Öffnungszeiten, Websites. Schön :)
Telefonnummern: Bitte so erfassen, wie das Wiki unter https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:phone erklärt. Also "+49 30 1234567" (die führende Null der Vorwahl entfällt. Alle Apps können damit umgehen).


Also bis auf die Telefonnummern eigentlich fein. Danke. Bitte weitermachen :)

Bei Fragen, immer raus damit

happy mapping
silversurfer83
Marek-M (2024-02-11 20:29:11+00:00): Błędnie utworzone jezdnie zamiast pasów ruchu.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147342827
t_ja (2024-01-29 19:50:39+00:00): Ahoj,
neviem aký je účel tejto sady zmien, ale došlo k rozbitiu multipolygónu: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12754109 , ktorý má teraz inner členov mimo oblasti ohraničenej outer členmi. 

Taktiež by si mal zvážiť prechod na Josm editor, ak chceš pracovať s reláciami, tam minimálne validátor vyhlási ešte pred uploadom do OSM, že nastali problémy a dáta sú nekonzistentné.

T.
t_ja (2024-01-29 19:55:07+00:00): Porovnal som to s Ortofotomozaikou a zmazal si polovicu lúk :(

Oprav si to prosím po sebe, lebo inak je to jasný kandidát na revert.
Maroš Klempa (2024-01-31 06:50:36+00:00): Prosím o ten revert. Táto zmena sa mi nepodarila. jej dôvod je na dlhé písanie.
t_ja (2024-01-31 20:17:42+00:00): Zmeny som revertol.
Ak treba niečo v danej oblasti zmeniť, stačí napísať čo (kľudne aj súkromnou správou).
Allison P (2024-02-04 03:44:01+00:00): Pay attention to the data you're "fixing". It was vandalism and got reverted.
fgouget (2024-06-10 23:49:20+00:00): Hi,

This changeset changes layer from -1 to 0 on the line 4 subway:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/682702942

But, as far as I know this line is 100% underground (even for the new extension to the Bagneux) so that does not seem right.

Cheers,
Marek-M (2024-02-11 20:27:57+00:00): Błędnie utworzone jezdnie zamiast pasów ruchu.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147342780
silversurfer83 (2024-01-29 21:40:17+00:00): Hi :)

du hast Details an diesem Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/7756494 bearbeitet. Da mir die Haupteigenschaft "Radweg" etwas komisch vorkommt würde ich gerne wissen ob es Verkehrszeichen gibt, die regeln, mit welchen Verkehrsmitteln der Weg genutzt werden darf (oder eben nicht). Kannst du mir da weiterhelfen?

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146835987
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-29 20:00:24+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11565271128
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/902036498

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
philippec (2024-08-09 16:06:33+00:00): Jakka, je hebt een fout gemaakt.
AEDs aan huizen plakken geeft dat soort dingen.
philippec (2024-08-09 16:07:13+00:00): Zie OC enkele huizen naar onder.
Diegovano (2024-01-29 19:58:31+00:00): Oops, mistyped the changeset description!
update open sections of future cycleway 4 alignment at Surrey Quays. Apart from the central section at the gyratory between Hawkstone Rd and Plough Way, the tracks are temporarily opened "with flow" pending completion of the rest of the scheme.
Glassman (2024-02-02 19:38:56+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146836347
Glassman (2024-02-02 19:40:39+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.

#TIP: sometimes the imagery is offset. It can be adjusted in the layers icon on the right side of the editor. The offset setting is located towards the bottom of the layers list.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146836452
aTarom (2024-01-30 08:06:26+00:00): Hola, gracias por editar, puedes revisar este name por favor?
"Subestacion eEectrica San Millán"
en
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/333654649/history

Subestacion -> Subestación
eEectrica -> Eléctrica
pero la duda es 
San Millán -> ¿Villamañán?

No estoy seguro y no veo tu fuente de datos, solo Bing y PNOA, así que pregunto primero antes de tocar nada y estropear valioso conocimiento local

Saludos
Glassman (2024-02-02 19:41:37+00:00): #TIP: square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q" for a more professional look.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146836688
Glassman (2024-02-02 19:41:41+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146836688
dypa (2024-02-02 09:37:38+00:00): При указании размеченных не регулируемых пешеходных переходов нельзя использовать тег crossing=zebra, см https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:crossing=zebra

Пожалуйста при внесении следующих правок используйте теги (Размеченный (нерегулируемый) пешеходный переход)
crossing=uncontrolled
crossing:markings=zebra
mini-me (2024-01-29 20:51:13+00:00): Заправка уже отмечена https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/125402814
mini-me (2024-01-29 20:49:50+00:00): Точки заведений нужно ставить рядом со входом примерно на таком расстоянии https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4347745502, а не по центру здания или на стене (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11169615729)
rskedgell (2024-04-30 09:20:00+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The building tag should only be applied to the outlines of actual buildings, not the entire parcel of land.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building

The layer=-1 tag tells routers and renderers that features are at different levels.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer

The historic=manor tag is probably better applied to the building itself (in this case, the Grade I listed Fairlawne), not the grounds.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dmanor

As Fiarlawne is presumably still a private residence, rather than a building operated by National Trust, English Heritage, etc., the original tagging of the surrounding area as landuse=residential was probably correct.

The formal gardens within the estate could be added as leisure=garden + access=private if you wanted more detail than just a pale grey area.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgarden

If you would like any help with this, please feel free to ask.
MxxCon (2024-02-06 06:58:17+00:00): Construction finished that quickly?🤨The sign said fall 2024 but it took them just 3 months in the winter?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146837603
MxxCon (2024-02-06 06:59:47+00:00): https://www.nycgovparks.org/planning-and-building/capital-project-tracker/project/9555 shows that it's still ongoing.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146837603
TheBestIdea (2024-02-06 16:26:36+00:00): This segment is done. Construction has moved to the west side of the park. As of 1/27/24, the construction closure starts about at node 608494060 and goes clockwise from there. Not sure what the northern end is. I entered the park at the north corner (by node 608494042). There were no signs of construction around there. It was all open, and I was able to bike clockwise until node 608494060.
infeeeee (2024-01-30 23:58:01+00:00): Visszavonva: https://www.osm.org/changeset/146883313
infeeeee (2024-01-30 23:57:57+00:00): Visszavonva: https://www.osm.org/changeset/146883313
infeeeee (2024-01-30 23:57:53+00:00): Visszavonva: https://www.osm.org/changeset/146883313
infeeeee (2024-01-30 23:44:33+00:00): Szia! Üdv az OpenStreetMapen!

Sajnos a változtatásaid sok hibás címkét és jelölést tartalmaznak, ezért vissza kell vonnom őket. 

Itt van urbalazs szerkesztőtársunk nagyon jó videója magyarul, hogyan kell buszjáratokat létrehozni:

https://tube.grin.hu/w/29f0be9a-0363-41eb-a279-d17404cceadd

Nem egyszerű feladat és az alapértelmezett iD szerkesztőben nem is lehet, ha ez érdekel, akkor a JOSM szerkesztővel kell elkezdened megismerkedni.

A highway=busway buszsáv jellegű utakat jelöl: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=busway

A network címke eredetileg is rosszul volt használva itt Dunaharasztiban, nem a járatok számát kell beírni oda: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:network

Ha a Ventona Kft. neve megváltozott Ventona-Trans Kft.-re, akkor azt nem egyesével kéne cserélgetni, vannak erre hatékonyabb eszközök. Jelenleg 62 helyen még a korábbi név maradt, te csak 7 helyen cserélted ki, így felemás az adatbázis állapota: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.hu/search?q=Ventona#values

Ne add fel, nagyon örülünk az új szerkesztőknek, csak mielőtt belemerülnél a nagy szerkesztésekbe, előbb meg kell tanulnod hogyan működik ez a lassan 20 éves rendszer. Több ezren szerkesztik a térképet egyszerre, a legalapvetőbb szabályokat mindenkinek be kell tartania, csak így működhet ez.

Ha kérdésed merülne fel, a magyar szerkesztő közösség elérhetőségeit megtalálod ezen az oldalon: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hungary/Közösség Ajánlom valahol kapcsolódj be a közösségbe valahol, kérdezhetsz, mindenki nagyon segítőkész.

Általános infók a magyar wikiben: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hu:Kezdőlap

Angol nyelvű részletes bevezető: https://learnosm.org/en/

További jó térképezést!
infeeeee (2024-01-30 23:57:46+00:00): Visszavonva: https://www.osm.org/changeset/146883313
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-29 21:12:46+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Miarki":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11565399004

"Władysława Reymonta":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11565399077

"Generała Sikorskiego":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11565399327
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11565399333
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11565399341
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11565399346

"Czarnoleska":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11565399493
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11565399495
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11565399497

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
SpinOff (2024-01-30 22:34:27+00:00): No ale żeby tyle relacji pousuwać?
SpinOff (2024-01-30 22:37:09+00:00): Wycofane

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146882072
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-17 08:33:54+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11565343365/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
AjBelnuovo (2024-01-29 21:38:14+00:00): Só que essa via já tinha sido corrigida. Não alterei o nome porque não tenho acesso ao condomínio
muralito (2024-01-31 11:58:18+00:00): Hola. No. La playa se dibuja al borde del agua, mar, lago, etc.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:natural=beach?uselang=es
erickdeoliveiraleal (2024-02-04 01:02:23+00:00): deleted
MxxCon (2024-02-06 07:06:28+00:00): If you search for 400 West 113th Street on jmapb's website it'll find BIN 1089808
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146839573
Robin Zyx (2024-02-06 07:39:10+00:00): How do I get from searching there to finding a building height? I click on the various links, and I don't see it.

Also, not sure whether my suggested tweak to the Cathedral outline is needed or not, if it would conflict with the shape in the city database?
Robin Zyx (2024-02-06 07:42:16+00:00): On the search page, there are heights listed, but like 12 of them.
MxxCon (2024-02-06 07:49:36+00:00): so if you go to https://jmapb.github.io/nycaabs/?search=1089808 it'll load all the building info and in the table below you'll see the first section called "Footprint". There you'll see the date this (version of) building was completed, if it's completed/demolished/under construction, and its height. The newest height is most likely the current one..
You can also click on "View BBL @ ZoLa" to open Zola and there you find how many floors a building it, how many apartments it has (and other unrelated to osm, but still interesting info).

jmapb's site also links to zoning documents. Zoning diagrams type "ZD1" most often have architectural drawing of the building with dimensions and heights of all/most sections of the building. They are very useful if you ever get into detailed 3d mapping of buildings.
Robin Zyx (2024-02-06 08:07:16+00:00): I'm looking at the entry for the building I live in, and now I see that the additional height entries seem to be for when facade inspection or other work was being done on the exterior or on the roof. Total height remains at the top of the water tank.
IpswichEdits (2024-01-30 11:09:59+00:00): Oh yes, well spotted, Thank you. I think that was my error! :-) Thanks for fixing it.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-29 22:00:16+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, zamień addr:place na addr:city. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/259518345

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
gscholz (2024-02-11 06:49:51+00:00): Hi Taophick,
your recent edits have left behind several errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=7.43015&lat=10.53795&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=146839993

Can you please fix this?

This kind of result is very typical for JOSM users who just press "o" and do not care about the results. You can apply the internal validator to avoid uploading such errors.

Kind regards
Guido
gormo (2024-01-29 22:08:21+00:00): ...ich meinte retail, nicht commercial.
os-emmer (2024-03-20 18:34:04+00:00): Hello n43fsa,
you added some addr:country=England here. The OSM-standard would be addr:country=GB. Is there a reason that you tagged the objects that way?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Aaddr%3Acountry

https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1ISI
n43fsa (2024-03-21 19:42:29+00:00): Thanks for correcting the data, I wasn't aware. Will tag countries per the ISO code convention in future.
Iain I (2024-01-29 22:32:55+00:00): This is a legitimate addition.

https://edmonton.ctvnews.ca/red-deer/central-alberta-family-transforms-old-school-into-brewery-1.5680374
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146840363
DressyPear4 (2024-01-30 05:01:56+00:00): Você pode substituir 'track' por 'service' nessas vias que chegam até nas residências
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146840393
ISAIASLIMA (2024-01-30 14:05:37+00:00): Posso sim, mas não tenho certeza se a engine de roteirização do graphhopper fará uma rota até o local necessário com essa alteração. De qquer forma vou efetuar a mudança e testar depois.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146840393
Santanaloba53 (2024-01-30 16:23:40+00:00): Hola porque modificas algo que ise yo soy de este pueblo y se los avances que hay  así que deja de fijarte y guiarte por  imágenes satélites atrasadas de bing map
BigKev97 (2024-01-31 18:58:03+00:00): Sólo eran errores en los nombres.
Glassman (2024-01-31 20:00:56+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146840736
VLD549 (2024-03-23 08:59:34+00:00): Hi, could you verify the name change from Wandelweg to Minister Tacklaan? I am asking because several sources seem to indicate the street Minister Tacklaan goes 'van de Doorniksewijk naar de Aalbeeksesteenweg.'
Therefore, my conclusion would be the part from Dooniksewijk direction east, to be Wandelweg.

Thank you for clarifying.
simo_explorer (2024-02-02 15:36:50+00:00): Good morning stasiu512,
you probably added some wrong tags (bicykle), could you check?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Abicycle
thanks for collaboration
stasiu512 (2024-02-05 21:51:49+00:00): Hello simo_fi, Do you mean railway=tram_level_crossing on highway=cycleway??
if so I can change it on railway=tram_crossing