piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
matheusgomesms (2023-02-23 01:31:14+00:00): Oi Thalita,

Primeiramente bem-vinda ao OSM! Bom ver que finalmente a HubLocal está editando por aqui! Se tiver qualquer dúvida, é só avisar!

Queria também dar dois avisos:

1: no OSM todos os nomes NÃO podem ser abreviados. Ou seja, ao colocar o nome das ruas favor colocar tudo por extenso, como Rua ou Avenida, ao invés de R. ou Av.

2: nessa sua edição do Bordô Importados, já havia um ponto com essa informação, ou seja, você pode (e deve!) atualizar a informação daquele ponto, ao invés de adicionar outro duplicado.

Novamente, bem-vinda e qualquer dúvida nos avise!

Att,
Matheus
user_18305684 (2023-02-24 21:55:25+00:00): Hi,

a waterway relation is not a collection of elements of a river but a collection of the waterway ways, see wiki : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:waterway

Please don't add water areas in a waterway relation.

And there was a gap in the waterway relayion : I fixed all.

Best regards
arvdk (2023-02-28 20:15:54+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3579098

Je mist oneways op de weg die je hebt gesplitst.

Groetjes, Arjan
A67-A67 (2023-02-28 22:37:46+00:00): Bedankt. Ik zie dat het al aangepast is.
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-27 08:38:06+00:00): Please do not use descriptive names such as "3 Fairway".  These names have been removed.
marc__marc (2023-02-23 13:57:59+00:00): Bonjour, merci pour tous ces ajouts mais je suis un peu perdu dans des tags que vous crééez
1) que veux dire fishing = restriction + fishing:restriction=no_fishing ? on peux pecher ou on peux pas ? la façon habituelle est de renseigner fishing=no si on ne peux pas ou fishing=private si c'est un entreprise ou un club ou fishing=permit s'il faut un permis

fishing:fr:description : quel différence avec description ?

que veux-dire fishing:fr:source:pref = pref84 ?

que  veux dire  fishing:fr:source:pref:arrete = Arrêté préfectoral du 18 Janvier 2021
si c'est la source utilissé pour ajouter unt ag ddans osm, c'est source:letag
si c'est pour relier une source d'information externe c'est source_ref
pas besoin de :fr dans les sources

fishing:fr:name = Réserve de pêche Lone de Lamiat
le :fr dans ce cas ci se met à la fin, ou encore mieux pas besoin d'en mettre puisque le français est la langue par défaut en france
mais quel est la différence enntre les 2 noms ? si c'est un nom alternatif il y a alt_name

Cordialement,
Marc
arz54 (2023-02-23 14:48:56+00:00): Bonjour
Pour votre point n°1 les tags utiliser ne sont pas assez détaillé pour la pêche pratiquée en France, il y a plus de subtilité d'où la création de tags

fishing= restriction permet de décrire une zone ou la pratique de pêche est réduite par voie réglementaire. (Préfecture, fédération,....) j'ai inventé ce tag car les autres ne convenait pas. Ce n'est pas que l'on ne peut pas pécher mais bien que l'on m'empêche de pêcher ce qui est différent du tag fishing=no (qui ne veut rien dire dans le contexte français et s'appliquerait plus à un panneau de signalisation interdisant la pêche dans une mare)

Pour fishing:fr:name il s'agit du nom de la réserve de pêche qui peut différer du nom du cours d'eau, ce sera un nom qui peut être utilisé par les pêcheurs sans pour autant être un nom alternatif au cours d'eau
En Revanche si le :fr est inutile je l'enlèverai (je n'étais pas sûr dans le doute je l'ai mis )

fishing:fr:description me permet de décrire les particularités seulement lié à la  zone de pêche

Pour les tags de sources effectivement une réflexion ce porte 
fishing:fr:source:pref ---> préfecture qui a émis l'arrêté
fishing:fr:source:pref:arrete---> n°de l'arrêté préfectoral qui définit des particularités à la zone de pêche 

Je vais modifier les tags pour enlever les :fr inutile, en tout cas je vous remercie pour l'intérêt que vous portez à mes contributions.
Si vous avez d'autres retour à me faire n'hésitez pas
Cordialement
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:11:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
MxxCon (2023-02-25 02:20:04+00:00): Hello.
According to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:contact:*
having full URL for these social network contacts is perfectly allowed. No need to change them.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132895212
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-02-23 18:33:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 132938781 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for vandalism done by this user in all their changesets.
gscholz (2023-05-03 07:26:13+00:00): Hi Ledres,
this changeset has destroyed the boundary relation of "Barrio El gallito" by deleting way 152456583:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-58.94167&lat=-34.91939&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=132895466

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
eggie (2023-02-22 19:13:09+00:00): Tip....   Je hoeft geen adressen aan te maken. Die zijn er al..  Even opsporen en daarop bijtaggen.
De info heb ik samengevoegd
Mapse
eggie
RBERD (2023-02-22 22:02:48+00:00): Oké, dan heb ik niet goed gekeken. Bedankt.
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-02-23 18:33:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 132938781 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for vandalism done by this user in all their changesets.
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2023-03-01 23:53:25+00:00): Brug . (punktum) som decimalkomma.
Dvs
width=2.3 i stedet for 2,3
Glassman (2023-02-23 18:03:30+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132896217
Glassman (2023-02-23 18:03:20+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132896245
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:10:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
Glassman (2023-02-23 18:03:50+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132896311
gscholz (2023-03-03 07:54:57+00:00): Hi alisari55,
your recent activities have left behind a lot of errors in the OSM database regarding not connected ways (red dots):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=34.47837&lat=41.68885&zoom=10&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1

As you may know, those ways are not usable by routing software. Can you please fix this?

Yo may also like to educate yourself about how to add changeset comments which give some information to other users about what you are doing:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Kind regards
Guido
Glassman (2023-02-23 18:10:34+00:00): #TIP: square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132896438
Frans S (2023-02-23 09:56:43+00:00): Hello. Thanks for your mapping on this project. 
Your mappings are rather precise mapped, however, mostly not squared.
Each rectangular building need to be squared with the Q key.
Best regards and keep mapping.
Frans S (2023-02-23 10:08:07+00:00): Just another point.
Please do not connect nodes from buildings to each other. It then seems they share walls. Each building should be considered as an individual building.
Best regards
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-22 21:59:55+00:00): Is this *really* the official name of this patch of grass?
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-02-23 18:33:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 132938781 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for vandalism done by this user in all their changesets.
Hufkratzer (2023-02-23 19:42:20+00:00): Hi, du hast an https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/205281354 das building=yes durch leisure=horse_riding ersetzt; deswegen ist es auch nicht mehr als Gebäude auf der Karte. Nach dem Luftbild ist es aber ein Gebäude. Jedes Gebäude sollte ein building-Tag haben; falls es eine Reithalle, kannst du https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:building=riding_hall verwenden. Dafür gibt es aber noch kein Preset, das muss man eintippen.
Das leisure=horse_riding (Preset "Reitanlage") ist nicht für Reithallen, Pferdeställe oder andere Gebäude geeignet, sondern für komplette Reitanlagen/Reiterhöfe u.ä., siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure=horse_riding
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30220880
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:10:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
Glassman (2023-02-23 18:13:19+00:00): #TIP: Not sure what the name tag is at the end of the original road is for. Can you remove it or fix the tagging?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132896539
kartler175 (2023-02-24 22:57:48+00:00): bittte etwas mehr Sorgfalt: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=6.84422&lat=50.47781&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.95&overlays=intersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cways
Glassman (2023-02-23 18:18:24+00:00): #TIP: we don't  use descriptive names. tagging it as amenity=letter_box is sufficient. You might also want to read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dletter_box to verify you used the correct tag.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132896575
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-02-23 18:33:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 132938781 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for vandalism done by this user in all their changesets.
fabiotofy (2023-02-23 06:50:05+00:00): Secondo me è sbagliato. Il numero ufficiale è SR409, il nome ufficiale è Strada Statale di Plessiva. Che senso ha mettere lo stesso valore in due tag differenti ? Se piuttosto non siete sicuri del nome ufficiale è meglio eliminare il tag reg_ref e basta
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132896619
alessandrocarmeli (2023-02-24 23:03:53+00:00): attenzione che in questo caso il tag reg_ref va bene. Indica solamente che la strada è di tipo regionale, oltre che al ref principale
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132896619
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:10:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
Glassman (2023-02-23 18:13:56+00:00): #TIP: square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132896632
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:12:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
SekeRob (2023-02-22 19:38:38+00:00): Linea 507: Chiasso Crocione - Chiasso Stazione => Morbio Inferiore Serfontana needs more work and study as it got impossible routing at Via Soldini and gaps as Chiasso Stazione.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:10:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
Glassman (2023-02-23 18:15:52+00:00): #TIP: We don't use descriptive names like Lake cabin or rv park. (Use the actual RV Park name. Also OSM uses British English since OSM was started in England. So an RV park is actually tagged as a caravan park
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132896827
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:10:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
silversurfer83 (2023-02-23 10:31:42+00:00): Hi again :)
why do you put nodes whithin the buildings and add practically the same information to those?

cheers
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132896938
Brainus (2023-03-01 16:09:16+00:00): Hi there,

see it as a kind of service I provide ;-P

As mentoined before I use OSM primally on my mobile via OSMAnd~, while exploring lonely to lost places.
I put additional nodes on buildings/structures/specific dangers of interest to provide more information for OSMAnd~Users via the "point of interest" function of the app.
Otherwise it wouldn't be possible to get this infos while navigating or exploring offline, because the offline dataset of OSM doesn't provide this level of detail for 'simple buildings' etc.. Keep in mind that in some areas I've mapped there isn't any cellular radio avialable - eg. in the Southern military facilities of Lastovo.
After all I can't see any disadvantage in this procedure. Let me know, if you find one.

Lastovo is 'my little baby' - it was poorely mapped when I firstly arrived there and there's still so much work to do...
I will continue - time after time - so feedback is welcome! :-)
Dávid Benko (2023-02-24 08:48:50+00:00): Takto sa traily neznačia. Keď vložíte názov trailu do tagu `name` na cestách, efektívne pridávate novú ulicu v príslušnej obci. A som si istý, že v Lackovciach ulica s názvom "Lackovský trail" neexistuje. Správne použitie je popísané v dokumentácii: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mountain_biking a https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:route%3Dbicycle
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-02-23 18:33:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 132938781 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for vandalism done by this user in all their changesets.
Glassman (2023-02-23 18:19:20+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132897178
CADdog63 (2023-02-24 06:44:35+00:00): Hallo,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/183111734
Dieses Objekt ist jetzt nur noch eine Linie mit Eigenschaften. Bitte prüfe, ob die Eigenschaften an das leicht verschobene Gebäude gehören, und ob die Linie gelöscht werden kann
Dávid Benko (2023-02-24 08:40:03+00:00): Tag `bicycle=yes` znamená, že verejnosť má oficiálne, zákonom povolené právo vjazdu na bicykli (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Key:access#Hodnoty_zna%C4%8Dek_access). Naozaj to v týchto prípadoch platí?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:10:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
Frans S (2023-02-28 17:27:18+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, during the validation process
I noticed that you are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.
We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,
Important. Read the instruction what to map. You mapped tree rows. Not mentioned in the instructions. 

Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.
Each rectangular building need to be squared. !!  Q key when still selected
Nodes of buildings may not connect to other buildings or features.
The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 
Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.


About highways. Please read the WIKI https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highways How to tag highways.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
legofahrrad (2023-02-22 19:50:58+00:00): Westbad hat geschlossen und wird abgerissen, danach folgt ein Neubau
legofahrrad (2023-02-22 19:51:23+00:00): source: local knowledge
gscholz (2023-02-24 07:08:20+00:00): Hi abebayehuz,
I have reverted this changeset to fix the errors discussed in your other contributions.

Please have a look at our documentation about how to handle gps tracks properly:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Convert_GPS_tracks

Guido
Glassman (2023-02-23 18:19:58+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132897493
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:10:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:10:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-02-23 16:09:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 132933680 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for vandalism
gscholz (2023-02-24 06:33:52+00:00): Hi juan_gutierrez,
this border does not have any attributes which may make this line valuable for OSM. Despite this you have created several errors regarding self intersecting lines:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-75.48370&lat=5.09709&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

Those errors I have just fixed, but the meaning of your addition is still missing. May be you like to educate yourself about the topic "boundary":

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:boundary

Kind regards
Guido
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:11:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:10:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
gscholz (2023-03-03 07:54:50+00:00): Hi alisari55,
your recent activities have left behind a lot of errors in the OSM database regarding not connected ways (red dots):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=34.47837&lat=41.68885&zoom=10&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1

As you may know, those ways are not usable by routing software. Can you please fix this?

Yo may also like to educate yourself about how to add changeset comments which give some information to other users about what you are doing:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Kind regards
Guido
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:10:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:11:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:11:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
os-emmer (2025-04-28 17:49:30+00:00): Hallo Langlaeufer,
hast du hier mit Absicht cycleway=no; foot=no; sidewalk=no an ein landuse=industrial gehängt?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24931090
Langlaeufer (2025-04-28 18:23:00+00:00): Natürlich nicht. Vermutlich die Straße nicht getroffen
os-emmer (2025-04-28 18:29:18+00:00): Danke für die schnelle Rückmeldung. Ich habe die Tags jetzt entfernt:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165561576
Falls du noch weißt, wo die Infos eigentlich hinsollten, kannst du die ja noch ergänzen.
Langlaeufer (2025-04-28 18:55:12+00:00): Die steasse ist ok
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:11:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
Lukas Zirpel (2026-04-09 15:18:08+00:00): Dieser Änderungssatz ändert die Oberfläche einer Fußgängerbrücke (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/135589094) von surface=concrete nach surface=metal_grid. War das Absicht? Zumindest auf den Bildern, auf die das Objekt verlinkt, sieht es nach Beton oder Asphalt aus (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Fu%C3%9Fg%C3%A4ngerbr%C3%BCcke%20%28Bahnhof%20Saarbr%C3%BCcken-Burbach%29?uselang=de) und ich meine, mich zu erinnern, dass es letzte Woche auch kein Metallgitter war.