piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisRevert (2026-03-15 05:33:10+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179883777
(Restore previous tags. No changes)

If you believe this was incorrect or would like to clarify the intent of the original tags, please reply here.
Tomas Straupis (2026-03-10 13:16:47+00:00): Kažkas su šituo negerai buvo... nes dingo beveik visa Miglos g. aš atšaukiau, kad atsistatytų gatvė, bet tikėtina, kad kažką tavo pakeitimų tuo pačiu atšaukiau... pažiūrėk, prašau. Jei ką, galėsim mano atšaukimą atšaukti :-)
Aurimas Fišeras (2026-03-10 17:19:40+00:00): Ką ir kaip netyčiom sugadinau nežinau...
Nieko su šia gatve specialiai nedariau, nors mačiau, kad ji pažymėta ne taip, kaip RC (ir analogiškai OSM), o kaip Google žymi...

Taisiau kažkurią Osmose klaidą, tada kažkiek geometrijos aplinkui ir JOSM validavimo klaidas, tai nieko ypatingo po atšaukimo nepraradome.
Osmose klaida vėl kažkada atsiras sąraše – ištaisysiu iš naujo.
Tomas Straupis (2026-03-10 19:18:24+00:00): Oki-doki!
iandees (2026-03-06 19:04:38+00:00): Node 10058551481 was reverted in changeset 179460593 (accidental drag detected by node-drag-watcher).
InfosReseaux (2026-03-06 19:14:40+00:00): thanks!
iandees (2026-03-06 19:18:35+00:00): Actually I think your change was totally fine and I undid my change. Thanks for making the map better!
InfosReseaux (2026-03-06 22:26:01+00:00): It's a regular (and manual) process we regularly execute to fix common errors, like removing blank nodes on power lines, fixing unfinished lines, missing poles... very long but satisfying!
Thank you for review, let's continue making better maps together
Nakaner (2026-03-09 11:22:04+00:00): Hi,

which "database" do you mean?

Best regards

Michael
Nakaner (2026-03-09 12:26:02+00:00): Hi,

you changed the admin_level=* tag of county boundary relation from admin_level=6 to 10 in this changeset. This has been reverted because it is obviously wrong.

Please be more careful when you edit OpenStreetMap.

You modify and create lots of relations. You might consider using a better editing software than iD. It is called JOSM.

Best regards

Michael
eggie (2026-03-06 19:15:15+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback Alle begin is moeilijk. De bedrijfsinfo staat nu op de adresnode. 
Voor nu even amenity=events_venue getagd. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
opendcc (2026-03-31 12:58:06+00:00): Was bedeutet entrance=lo?
Syl (2026-03-06 20:36:31+00:00): Bonjour, il y a deux défibrillateurs différents dans la mairie ou il s'agit du même ?
setagllib (2026-03-07 05:06:30+00:00): Il s'agit du même.
setagllib (2026-03-07 05:29:24+00:00): C'est une erreur. La modification aurait dû être appliquée à un défibrilateur proche.
Syl (2026-03-07 07:01:29+00:00): Je viens de supprimer le défibrillateur en double, merci !
setagllib (2026-03-07 08:07:57+00:00): C'est moi qui vous remercie.
convissor (2026-03-28 02:49:19+00:00): Hi hwierzbicki: What is the purpose of adding barrier=curb + kerb=yes which indicates there is an actual barrier to wheelchair access, if you don't know if there is wheelchair ramp or not?
hwierzbicki (2026-03-28 16:35:55+00:00): Rapid auto-adds "kerb=yes" whenever adding unspecified curb nodes.

Discussed on github here:

https://github.com/facebook/Rapid/issues/1672

Reviewing the wiki, Rapid may not be following "best" practice here:

>Some sort of kerb is present, but it can't or hasn't yet been determined whether it is raised, lowered, flush, etc. This may be useful when mapping via aerial imagery (prior to field survey) or if the exact type of kerb can't be recalled.
‡: Cautious routers could consider this to mean wheelchair=no, so whenever possible this value should not be used other than on a temporary basis.

But there's also 60k instances with this mapping convention:

https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/kerb=yes

So perhaps the wiki/routers should be updated to better handle this
convissor (2026-03-28 18:22:49+00:00): Yes, I read the wiki before commenting. You and I obviously have different mapping styles. :) When adding walking/cycling routes, I like to continue ways across streets, and indicate crosswalk/ramp info in the intersecting node. (Though I will add specific curb nodes where obstructions block people). This makes adding, editing, and (most importantly) reading the easier.
convissor (2026-03-28 18:25:50+00:00): I guess my point/question is "how does adding all of those curb nodes (and crosswalks) help end users?"
hwierzbicki (2026-03-28 19:38:23+00:00): Adding a curb node or crossing way establishes physical presence and inherently provides more data than omitting it (even if not every property of the node/way is denoted).

Does all mapping need to immediately benefit end users (or data customers) for it to be useful?
NeisBot (2026-03-06 19:15:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 29 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1389460549 v1 | 8 crossings
https://osm.org/way/229639680 v16 | 7 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1218680602 v4 | 7 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/3790239912 v3

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179460832
DD1GJ (2026-03-07 08:32:40+00:00): Revert 179466141 179465969 17946083., Durch Anfänger verschobene Punkte, Konfliktauflösung
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-07 09:32:58+00:00): Thanks @DD1GJ
Bienson (2026-03-10 01:08:43+00:00): Sehr unnötiges Multipolygon erzeugt
FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (2026-03-10 13:17:42+00:00): Weshalb unnötig? Der Platz hat diese Form.
DD1GJ (2026-03-07 08:39:07+00:00): Teilrevert 179461003, verschobene Bank
marczoutendijk (2026-03-06 19:29:43+00:00): Omdat het commentaar hierboven niet langer kan nog even dit:
Het betreffende pad is nauwelijks als pad waarneembaar en er staat geen enkele aanwijzing op het fietspad langs de Leemculeweg (waar het een aftakking van moet zijn).
Eenmaal op het echte fietspad is het door mijn gewijzigde pad ook nauwelijks te herkennen als zichtbaar pad.
Om die reden heb ik het wel op OSM laten staan, want als je durft, kun je er wel op lopen, maar fietsen??
eggie (2026-03-06 19:41:44+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Harm PB (2026-03-06 19:50:34+00:00): Thx
Frans S (2026-03-07 13:39:06+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
You forgot to tag the buildings. !!
eggie (2026-03-06 20:38:14+00:00): Dag Theindra.
Die tags zijn op een footway allemaal default.
Mvg
eggie
eggie (2026-03-07 08:31:12+00:00): Goe om die doorsteken toe te voegen. 
Die doorsteken zijn vaak geen highway=footway, maar highwa=path en mogen gewoon door fietsers worden gebruikt.
Alleen wanneer er een G7 bord staat is het een footway en mag er niet gefietst worden.
Kijk nog eens naar je edits svp. 
MVG
eggie
TheIndra (2026-03-07 12:43:38+00:00): Dag Eggie,
Bedankt voor je feedback.
Ik heb het aangepast naar een highway=path. Echter lijken de rest van de tags automatisch toegevoegd te worden door iD en kan ik die niet weglaten (zover ik weet).
eggie (2026-03-07 12:49:15+00:00): Hoi..
Geen idee. Ik gebruik editor josm.
Bij footway hoef je geen defaults toe te voegen.
Bij path heeft t wel nut. ..bicycle=yes of no.
Dan weet een medemapper of er een survey is geweest.
Die overbodige tags op de footway zijn geen ramp. Ze kunnen geen kwaad.
Gr eggie
tomhukins (2026-03-10 14:55:54+00:00): I notice you are tagging things as "bicycle=no" again.

The discussion at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/i-have-a-problem-with-a-user-being-very-rigid-with-legal-interpretation-of-access-rules/139067/36 suggests bicycle=dismount would work better, although conscensus seems to be most pavements are best tagged without any bicycle=*.

What do you plan to do about this disagreement of approaches to mapping?
Pete Owens (2026-03-15 01:31:56+00:00): That discussion appears to be between a single scofflaw cyclist who thinks cyclists ought to be allowed to ride on pavements and a shedload of other posters pointing out how he is wrong. UK traffic law is clear and unambiguous that cycling on pavements is illegal. OSM has to represent the world as it is - not how  TomJeffs thinks it ought to be.

Some suggest that the tagging is correct, but unnecessary; that routers ought to know (unfortunately they don't). No one other than TomJeffs suggested that there is anything wrong with bicycle=no.  

The discussion then moves on to footpaths away from roads where the situation is more ambiguous and needs to be decided on a case by case basis. But, this particular case is a bog standard pavement on which cycling is illegal.
GinaroZ (2026-03-15 20:55:56+00:00): "But, this particular case is a bog standard pavement on which cycling is illegal." 
I mean so is driving, so you should be adding motor_vehicle=no (and horse=no?) as well.
Pete Owens (2026-03-16 00:34:47+00:00): The default tagging for motor_vehicles is already correct - ie "no". Cycling is prohibited by law so access tagging needs to be changed from "Not Specified" to "no".


I'm not sure of the legal situation regarding horses so I left the default - "Not Specified".  I will leave that for someone who knows about equestrian access rules.
GinaroZ (2026-03-16 16:11:18+00:00): I think you may be getting confused with the iD editor's placeholder values in the access field, with what is actually tagged on the footway here in the OSM data. 

When you add a footway it doesn't by default add bicycle or motor_vehicle access tags. I agree cycling is prohibited but so is driving yet you've only tagged one of those modes as "no".
Pete Owens (2026-03-16 17:29:18+00:00): So you have posted (twice!) to point out that you agree the bicycle=no is accurate.

There are many other properties that are still to be tagged (width, surface, lighting and so on). If you are concerned about equestrian access  then you could simply tag that yourself.
Pete Owens (2026-03-16 17:50:40+00:00): Of course the sensible way to represent pavements is simply to (correctly) apply the sidewalk tag to the highways that they are part of.
mikelmaron (2026-03-06 19:52:26+00:00): this is from a WIP vibe coded manual conflation tool w/ Overture
Langlaeufer (2026-03-19 09:10:08+00:00): Hi
am Altenauer Weg sind nur unter der Brücke Radwege.
NeisBot (2026-03-06 20:18:47+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13297150257 v4

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Property management office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-15 05:33:10+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179883778
(Restore previous tags. No changes)

If you believe this was incorrect or would like to clarify the intent of the original tags, please reply here.
NeisBot (2026-03-06 20:24:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13621481350 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Tractor dealership"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-15 05:33:13+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179883779
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
Norbert Dichter (2026-03-06 21:12:01+00:00): Hello, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. Thank you for your contribution. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. Or just hit the Q-key.
Also please keep in mind: many buildings are very close but do not actually touch each other, try to map them close to each other without letting them connect or share nodes with each other, roads, or residential area outlines. In the iD web editor, holding down the "alt" key will keep nodes from "snapping" to each other and accidentally connecting.  Thanks so much for your contribution, Norbert 'Nodi' Dichter, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179462915
NeisBot (2026-03-06 20:30:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13525170948 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Boat lift manufacturer"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-15 05:33:14+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179883781
(Restore previous tags. No changes)

If you believe this was incorrect or would like to clarify the intent of the original tags, please reply here.
NeisBot (2026-03-06 20:36:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13527360950 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Mechanical workshop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-15 05:33:14+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179883782
(Restore previous tags. No changes)

If you believe this was incorrect or would like to clarify the intent of the original tags, please reply here.
stillhart (2026-03-14 15:38:33+00:00): hi. I think here you mapped the whole supercharger into many charging station but that is wrong. a charging station can be an area for the whole set of chargers too. each individual station is then a https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dcharge_point

see also
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station

you mind if I fix it?
JuanjoMC (2026-03-14 20:45:36+00:00): Hi,

until now, I've been mapping (and other mappers in Belgium as well) individual charge points as amenity=charging_station. Is that man_made=charge_point something new? I've never heard about it before.

Anyway, feel free to fix but, please, do not remove the charging points and the parking/parking spaces. I like micromapping, too ;-)

Cheers
stillhart (2026-03-15 10:05:12+00:00): Yes, as much as I know it's kind of new, 2-3 years maybe. The whole charging situation is slowly unwinding. It's also why I am often commenting like this.  I want people to know and I want OSM to be perfect for electric cars. I hate the 1000 local apps for every country and charging provider. 

But it's probably not too bad to have them the old way. In the past, most charging stations were small anyway, often 1-2 stations except for Tesla.
I think one could get charging stations that are in very close proximity using overpass turbo. I did some script in the past to find all the tesla stations like this, was pretty easy.

It's a lot worse if you look at the sockets. so much happened there and is still happening. meanwhile editors like iD are lagging completely due to discussions. But as usual in OSM, from nothing, to something, to better, to perfect :-)
stillhart (2026-03-15 10:15:21+00:00): I just noticed iD says that man_made shouldn't be on a line, which then breaks the autocomplete to a charge_point...
NeisBot (2026-03-06 20:42:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13529889058 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Beauty shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-15 05:33:15+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179883783
(Restore previous tags. No changes)

If you believe this was incorrect or would like to clarify the intent of the original tags, please reply here.
Frans S (2026-03-07 13:17:52+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 
A remark. Don't add a tag area=yes to a building.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179463789
NeisBot (2026-03-06 21:09:48+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13619006095 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Insurance office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-15 05:33:16+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179883784
(Restore previous tags. No changes)

If you believe this was incorrect or would like to clarify the intent of the original tags, please reply here.
Frans S (2026-03-07 13:15:47+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179464172
Adam Haba (2026-03-06 21:21:34+00:00): Głowackiego*
Frans S (2026-03-07 13:14:48+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
Issues found on your mappings
A: Inaccurate mapping. 
E: Buildings not squared or rounded.
G: Included the shadow of the building.

 Qualtity prevails above quantity !

Explanation can be found in this document which  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179464531
NeisBot (2026-03-06 21:21:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/688197944 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Mexican American Grocery"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-15 05:33:16+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179883785
(Restore previous tags. No changes)

If you believe this was incorrect or would like to clarify the intent of the original tags, please reply here.
george1201 (2026-03-07 21:55:27+00:00): Hallo kkettinger.
Wenn du jetzt alle Artikel aufzählen möchtest, welche dort angeboten werden, dann wird die zur Verfügung stehende Zeichenanzahl nicht ausreichen.
kkettinger (2026-03-08 08:41:11+00:00): Hallo george1201,
gibt es hier eine Regel wie man damit umgeht? Wenn jemand speziell nach Nudeln sucht, die er am Sonntag von einem Automaten braucht, würde es gefunden werden. Andere Produkte dann leider nicht.
george1201 (2026-03-08 21:56:12+00:00): Wenn ich mir das Wiki zu amenity=vending_machine anschaue, dann gibt es offenbar keinen eigenen Tag, um die einzelnen Produkte aufzuzählen. Nach der Beschreibung von food=* scheint das auch keine geeignete Stelle zu sein.
Ich persönlich bin der Meinung, dass eine detaillierte Aufzählung wenig Sinn macht, weil das Verkaufsangebot ja einem steten Wandel unterworfen ist. Aber vielleicht denken andere anders darüber. Ich würde dir deswegen vorschlagen, dass du die Fragestellung mal im OSM-Forum https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/de/ zur Diskussion stellst. Dort bekommt man in der Regel schnelle Rückmeldungen und oft gute Lösungsvorschläge.
george1201 (2026-03-08 22:00:52+00:00): Übrigens: Ich habe kürzlich die Produkt-Aufzählung beim nahegelegenen Schleinkofer-Automaten https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4477906861 entfernt. Eben aus dem Grund, weil man das unmöglich auf dem aktuellen Stand halten kann.