piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Djminisite (2024-05-19 21:10:08+00:00): Just wondering where the directions have come from in the names. As far as I know, no stops in the local area have the direction as part of the name.
NeisBot (2024-04-02 14:04:02+00:00): Hello xSilmarilSx, thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.Please see https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 

Thanks!

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
jemily1 (2024-03-30 20:21:54+00:00): Hola compañero

En los nombres en español de las calles de Alicante no se utiliza el artículo ni la preposición (Calle Maestro ??? en vez de Calle del Maestro ???, Calle Valencia en vez de Calle de Valencia, Calle Profesor ??? en vez de Calle del Profesor ???, etc.) En cambio, en  los nombres en catalán, sí se usa la preposición y el artículo

Tenlo en cuenta al revisar los nombres, ya que hay calles que las he revisado recientemente y ahora le has vuelto a poner el artículo o preposición que yo había quitado.  

Saludos
Enock4seth (2024-05-06 22:57:06+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap. Thanks for mapping.

Many of the features and attributes you have added here are problematic and can be improved. 

The name field is to be used for the name of the features and should be in title case eg. Gbewaa Primary School not "GBEWAA PRIMARY SCHOOL".

The names of the roads should not be descriptions.

Also don't map buildings within buildings. Here is a resource to guide you on contributing to OpenStreetMap with iD editor https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/
Kovoschiz (2024-03-31 09:52:30+00:00): This rectangle is for the lot. It can be seen from old maps. You should create a separate object.
Colbertson (2024-03-30 20:38:42+00:00): o crap it grabbed all of the 2023-01-01 in the world i only meant to edit the ones in latvia
thanks automatic taginfo overpass query.....
NorthCrab_upload (2024-03-30 20:50:33+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1066231508

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NieWnen (2024-03-31 12:21:06+00:00): Czy tutaj jest zwykłe przejście dla pieszych, czy może przejazd rowerowy, albo może łączone?
Tomasz Ucieszyński (2024-04-01 09:03:20+00:00): tylko i wyłącznie PdP
NieWnen (2024-03-31 12:20:59+00:00): Cześć, 
dzięki za zmiany.

access w takim przypadku lepiej po prostu usunąć, bo "yes" oznacza, że wszystko może się po tej ścieżce poruszać :)
Hufkratzer (2024-03-30 21:11:28+00:00): Hola,
Me alegro de que te hayas dado cuenta por ti mismo de que las pistas deberían tener la etiqueta leisure=piich en lugar de leisure=horse_riding. También podrías combinar las dos partes del centro hípico como un multi-polígono, como aquí: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14685141
NorthCrab_upload (2024-03-30 20:50:34+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11774248727

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
AndyB_66 (2024-03-31 20:38:08+00:00): Byłeś proszony o stosowanie się do zasad obowiązujących na OSM (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian) i nadawanie swoim zestawom zmian sensownych nazw. Niestety, zignorowałeś te prośby - być może nie rozumiesz, że nie mapujesz dla siebie, a dla innych i to społeczność, w której dobrowolnie uczestniczysz wyznacza reguły, nie Ty. Twoje zachowanie (także brak odpowiedzi na komentarze) - o ile go nie zmienisz - może być odebrane jako nieuprzejme i grubiańskie, a Twoja osoba jako niepożądana w grupie OSM.
grzegorz75jan (2024-04-01 13:02:46+00:00): Niestety tak opisujących swoje zmiany jest na pęczki. Jestem za tym aby trochę bardziej to ukrócić. Poza tym piknie tu tak na oko.
tekim (2024-03-31 00:23:36+00:00): Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.  Thanks for your edits to the map.  Unfortunately, we are not allowed to use Google Earth when editing OpenStreetMap due to Google's terms of use.
tekim (2024-03-31 00:23:56+00:00): Reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149372847
tekim (2024-03-30 21:17:47+00:00): Reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149368866
tekim (2024-03-31 00:21:38+00:00): Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap!  Thanks for your edits to the map.  Unfortunately, we are not allowed to use Google Maps when editing OpenStreetMap due to Google's terms of use (probably can't use Apple Maps either).
tekim (2024-03-31 00:22:09+00:00): Reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149372808
joost schouppe (2024-04-03 07:57:17+00:00): De beek was hier reeds gemapped als "in een buis onder grondniveau". Dus nu is er een brug over volle grond getekend :)
Zit de beek hier in een buis of is er werkelijk een brugje?
BeerselMapper (2024-04-03 09:27:05+00:00): Dag Joost, het is wel degelijk een brugje over een open beek. Bedankt voor je scherpe ogen, ik pas het beekje aan.
mikeocool (2024-04-23 18:41:15+00:00): Hey there -- the classification of Barnstable and it's villages has been discussed pretty extensively in the OSMUS by many folks with local knowledge.  I'd encourage you to checkout this thread https://osmus.slack.com/archives/CDW2RNQ5D/p1700002365783089 and engage in the conversation there before changing things extensively.
Глеб (2024-06-06 21:33:47+00:00): По кадастру это два дома
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-31 18:30:48+00:00): "that were called the Bedlam Steps" - is name still in use?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-31 18:31:52+00:00): BTW, I tried mapping them from aerial - does https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1373480155 look reasonable?
sfgreenwood (2025-03-31 18:37:31+00:00): They are still known as Bedlam Steps, and your path looks about right. Thanks!
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-31 20:26:35+00:00): edited in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164347968
DUGA (2024-04-11 01:32:18+00:00): When TIGER was imported years ago, the alignment was terrible.

If you remove TIGER flags, at least you need to align them with a valid orthoimagery. Other editors will track changes based on tags, if you drop these tags while leaving the ugly alignments there, essentially everyone else will have a tough time locating TIGER junks.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/TIGER_fixup
Messinian (2024-04-11 07:11:05+00:00): Can you please be more specific? I don’t remove the tags unless I update the geometry (if it needs it). Was there a specific way that was a problem?  Today I noticed that some uploads from ID didn’t seem to include my changes. I have no idea why. I did notice in this are that there were some obviously wrong roads without the tiger tags.
Messinian (2024-04-11 18:49:14+00:00): So I checked this changeset and I made alignment changes to every road where I deleted the tags, with one exception, it was a way you had previously updated but did not remove the tiger tags. I reviewed the geometry and it didn’t need changes. 

So I’m not sure what the issue is here. I also checked your changeset over this area with the comment “Emergency Update” to see if there was something I missed. You made a few changes to one road that I had edited that could be called cosmetic at best given the new nodes were mostly within a lines width of the old. One exception is a rural intersection that I had mapped wrong, so thanks for fixing that.
DUGA (2024-04-12 01:29:57+00:00): openstreetmap.org/way/10697021/history
pavvv (2024-06-01 13:34:28+00:00): nie wiem skąd ta nazwa, ale na pewno nie z tablicy
maraf24 (2024-06-01 15:10:59+00:00): Nawet na GSV widać tę tablicę.
pavvv (2024-06-01 17:29:26+00:00): Od strony Kępy na GSV widać inną tablicę https://maps.app.goo.gl/JfMsSyg71KKqZoAY7?g_st=ac a od strony Długiej widać nową tablicę np. na tym filmie https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hRl6WvOu1lo&t=74s (15:59)
Sprawdzając w terenie po obu stronach jest „Most drogowy im. Romana Dmowskiego”.
maraf24 (2024-06-01 18:49:28+00:00): Czyli nazwa jest z tablicy. Chyba że w "R." chodzi o innego Dmowskiego niż Romana?
pavvv (2024-06-01 19:07:56+00:00): Skróciłeś nazwę, podczas gdy zazwyczaj się je rozwija. Powinniśmy pisać pełną nazwę, jak na tablicy, przy czym rozwinięcie skrótu „im.” jest niepewne, ale przynajmniej w Warszawie się nie rozwija.
maraf24 (2024-06-01 19:36:58+00:00): * "imienia" jest opcjonalne. To oczywiste, że ten most nie należy do Romana Dmowskiego ani go nie budował, tylko jest jego imienia. 
* Nie umieszczamy w nazwach kategorii, rodzai itp. chyba że tych informacji nie ma w innych tagach. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only 
* Oficjalna nazwa tego mostu to "Most Romana Dmowskiego" i to koresponduje z nazwą na tablicy.
* https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name
"As a rule of thumb, the primary name would be the most obvious name of the feature, the one that end users expect data consumers to expose in a label or other interface element. "
0xb7767000 (2024-04-23 11:42:28+00:00): Wäre es nicht sinvoller gewesen den POI auf disused: zu setzen, oder soll hier wirklich auf absehbare Zeit nichts neues mehr rein kommen?
marczoutendijk_repair (2024-04-03 19:14:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149539606 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to vandalism.
user_11609320 (2024-03-30 21:42:11+00:00): there is  video online that shows that this is gone
marczoutendijk_repair (2024-04-03 19:14:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149539606 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to vandalism.
rskedgell (2024-03-31 06:23:50+00:00): You may consider it unnecessary, but another mapper took the time to map that detail. Unless the feature doesn't exist, please revert your changeset.
Bexhill-OSM (2024-03-31 12:00:50+00:00): Thanks for catching that, however 'another mapper' was me! I'm trying to be more consistent and use landuse=grass for smaller areas now.
4004 (2024-03-31 01:26:40+00:00): note=ref?
Leo Slager (2024-03-30 22:54:39+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Leo Slager (2024-03-30 22:58:41+00:00): Hoi,
Even een vraag: Je hebt access=no toegevoegd, maar de foot:conditional heb je laten staan.
Als het pad ppk overdag niet meer gebruikt kan worden, dan moet die foot:conditional nog wel verwijderd worden.
Kijk je daar nog even naar ?
DUGA (2024-05-10 17:45:45+00:00): If you run cleanup then name_1 needs to be taken care of. Either unsigned_ref or alt_name.

Also you must not use PennDOT to verify the name of road not maintained by the state. PennDOT is not responsible for the data accuracy of them.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/10721932/history#map=15/41.9475/-76.1578
Messinian (2024-05-31 05:45:18+00:00): Yes, the name_1 tag was an error which I fixed. The source for the name was Bradford County address data from PASDA, not Penndot
aixbrick (2024-03-31 08:48:36+00:00): Hallo,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/98779963: Es gibt hier keine bauliche Trennung zwischen Abbiegespur und Straße. Das war vorher mit lanes-Tagging korrekt  erfasst. Änderst du das daher bitte wieder zurück.
Gruß
Christoph Rackwitz (2024-03-31 09:43:12+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. Wieder was gelernt.
Christoph Rackwitz (2024-03-31 09:46:17+00:00): Was für Werkzeuge gibt es eigentlich, um die Änderungen eines Changesets visuell darzustellen?
aixbrick (2024-03-31 10:07:30+00:00): Ich nutze dafür OSMCha. Beispiel: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149370632/
Christoph Rackwitz (2024-03-31 10:45:46+00:00): Thema hoffentlich richtig geloest in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149384087
aixbrick (2024-03-31 10:57:58+00:00): Nur zum Teil. Es fehlen die Informationen, die vorher in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/261740049/history enthalten waren (3 Spuren, turn:lanes...; das rot markierte Stück im o.g. OSMCha-Link). Du müsstest dafür https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/261740050 aufteilen und entsprechend taggen.
Christoph Rackwitz (2024-03-31 11:50:48+00:00): Sowas in der Art hatte ich befuerchtet. Ich habe keine Ahnung, wie die Tags urspruenglich verschwunden gingen. OSMCha ist mir auch nicht gelaeufig, also was man wo sucht und findet und wie man das alles zu verstehen hat. Ich schaue mich mal um...
Christoph Rackwitz (2024-03-31 11:58:31+00:00): Gibt es irgendeine Möglichkeit, den Zustand zu einem gewissen Zeitpunkt zu "sehen", also nicht nur gerendert sondern die Information? Mir scheinen die richtigen Tools zu fehlen, weil alles, was ich bisher kenne, immer nur einen Teil der Funktionen hat und Infos anzeigt, die man eigentlich haben will. Wenn ich in iD bearbeite und z.B. einen Weg auswähle, dann sehe ich nirgends die ID, sondern muss in den Eigenschaften ganz unten den "View on openstreetmap.org" Link hovern.
Christoph Rackwitz (2024-03-31 12:07:23+00:00): Ist das jetzt korrekt? https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149387369
aixbrick (2024-03-31 12:29:57+00:00): Ja, passt so, danke. Zu dem anderen schreibe ich eine PN.
sanchi (2024-03-31 13:42:31+00:00): Hola.
He revertido el conjunto de cambios. Se ha puesto enfrente osea arriba no a la derecha como se dice en la nota. No puede estar en sentido contrario a la ruta de bus. Además se borra información de la parada.
Un saludo.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-03 06:50:22+00:00): Hello!

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1267791287 - are you sure that operator on this parking is tagged correctly?

And how you know that this is used for parking?
MxxCon (2024-04-01 05:23:49+00:00): Hello.
Please pay attention to accurately tag whether a crosswalk has traffic lights or not. Intersections with traffic lights can often be spotted by diagonal gantries extending from the corners of the intersection. This is not always the case, but very often.
Alternatively, STOP sign intersections will often have "STOP" written on the road just before cars' stop line.

Also, please pay attention to position curbs where they actually are, and not at just a random corner of 2 sidewalks.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask. 👍
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149371722
flohoff (2024-03-31 08:56:40+00:00): Danke für die Korrekturen. Ich vermute vor allem die korrekturen der Fußgängerampeln haben das routing verändert.

Hier - Rot Alt, Grün neu.

https://osm.zz.de/routeqa/?rid=672140,752355

Ich kann das nicht zuende beurteilen aber das sieht nicht so falsch aus.

Flo
Emilius123 (2024-03-30 23:23:52+00:00): Quelle außerdem survey
sykul (2025-02-20 11:06:44+00:00): Hi. Does this mean Wooster Pike is the only name for this road now? I ask because the name:pronunciation tags still mention the Wooster Road pronunciation.
Also, if it's all Wooster Pike, you can probably condense all of the forward/backward/etc. tags into just name="Wooster Pike"
Leo Slager (2024-03-31 21:55:09+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Leo Slager (2024-03-31 22:00:39+00:00): Dag Jesper,

Alle begin is moeilijk. Je hebt hier een grens op de kaart gezet en daar een plaatsnaam aan gekoppeld.
Maar de grens van de plaats Woerden ligt natuurlijk elders.
En het station Woerden staat al op de kaart: dat is het blauwe blokje met plaatsnaam in het stationsgebouw.
Ik zal de changeset reverten.
Sandal man (2024-03-31 06:11:18+00:00): Hello,
Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-)
But please make smalle change sets, this helps others in tracking changes. 
Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset
Enock4seth (2024-05-18 13:54:13+00:00): Hi, welcome and thanks for mapping. I have reverted this change because the imagery by default has an offset, which is no fault of yours but should not be used to add/delete existing data that might look wrongly mapped.  This guide about iD for beginners should be helpful https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/
Allison P (2024-10-30 21:59:19+00:00): I suspect https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1228370128 is capitalized "McNeil" and the address import did not add proper capitalization
NeisBot (2024-03-31 01:04:02+00:00): Hello huskminer, thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.Please see https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 

Thanks!

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
Aim311_ (2024-03-31 10:47:20+00:00): Przychodnia lekarska bez amenity nie będzie się renderowała oraz prawdopodobnie nie będzie możliwa do odszukania.  https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11666230196
rskedgell (2024-03-31 06:28:26+00:00): Thanks for adding the clinic, but please supply a meaningful changeset comment rather than "jhkf,.msnmdc".

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
plamen (2024-03-31 05:57:46+00:00): Съсипахте я тази улица!
Aim311_ (2024-03-31 07:11:16+00:00): Cześć. Mam kilka uwag do zmian, które wprowadziłeś — prawdopodobnie automatycznie chyba automatycznie.
Aim311_ (2024-03-31 07:17:06+00:00): 1. Jak poprawiasz element to nie musisz kasować obiektu i dodawać go na nowo, ponieważ niszczysz jego historię edycji (akademiki)
2. Podczas edycji głównych budynków uczelni usunąłeś wysokość budynków poszczególnych elementów (Colegium Maximum) sale wykładowe nie mają wysokości 10 pieter. ps. wcześniej było 11 pieter dla budynku col. Max
Aim311_ (2024-03-31 07:21:01+00:00): Odpal sobie Organic Maps tam masz widok 3D przed zmianami, które wprowadziłeś.
Gazer75 (2024-08-24 12:06:46+00:00): Du har blanda produksjon og effekt. Fennefoss er 9,5 MW. Produksjon har ingen tag i OSM.
Alex Basau (2024-03-31 02:53:23+00:00): https://www.oregon.gov/odot/Safety/Documents/OregonBikePedDriverRules.pdf page 25

814.420 Failure to use bicycle lane or path; exceptions;

1) Except as provided in subsections (2) and (3) of this section, a person commits the offense of failure to
use a bicycle lane or path if the person operates a bicycle on any portion of a roadway that is not a bicycle lane or bicycle path when a bicycle lane or
bicycle path is adjacent to or near the roadway.
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2024-03-31 03:16:58+00:00): 辛苦了！还有一位 Janus95624 也在附近编辑过来着，昨天打算挨个查看，还没看
aharvey (2025-02-08 11:19:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162275567 due to the use of proprietary data.
user_7130456 (2024-03-31 03:31:58+00:00): reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149375189
aharvey (2025-02-08 11:19:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162275515 due to use of proprietary data in the changes.
eggie (2025-01-03 16:12:21+00:00): c ?
Igor Bubelov (2024-04-02 04:31:32+00:00): Hi,

This is an address, not a merchant. It can't accept bitcoins
Taya_S (2024-04-02 18:40:12+00:00): This user also seems to be misusing OSM as their own database. Creating an undocumented tag and having 100% of all values link to their own website is not approriate imo. 

https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/payment%3Alightning%3Acompanion_app_url#overview
weareallsatoshi (2024-04-04 07:38:15+00:00): Hi,
Igor, please which merchant can't accept bitcoin?
Igor Bubelov (2024-04-04 07:41:52+00:00): At least those two:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/296755143

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/296843291
Igor Bubelov (2024-04-04 07:47:09+00:00): They aren't really merchants, they're plain addresses, meaning there is no business there. I noticed some Qerko shops nearby, so it looks like their script is creating duplicates
weareallsatoshi (2024-04-04 08:23:50+00:00): Thank you
pepakriz (2024-04-04 12:20:37+00:00): Hi, a developer from Qerko here.

I've fixed it (removed btc-related flags and updated our internal database to have correct node IDs targeting the businesses instead of house numbers)

Thank you for your notice.
ouchjars (2024-03-31 09:30:57+00:00): What was wrong here? The cycleway is mapped separately from the main carriageway so it had its own highway=traffic_signals node at the stop line for the intersection, like the other incoming ways. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtraffic_signals#Traffic_signals_for_cyclists
slice0 (2024-03-31 12:52:04+00:00): ok, paths/shared paths and cycleways are covered with the "crossing" node at intersections and in this case the "pedestrian crossing with traffic signals" node. This cycleway could be incorrectly placed as it is a shared path because horses are allowed to walk on the same marked path. The road itself could be tagged with the path because there is no separation. Cycleways are generally reserved for dedicated bike paths along creeks, along the beach for example. I hope this helps you ouchjars! I am always happy to discuss my changesets and the reasoning behind them.
ouchjars (2024-04-01 05:54:37+00:00): Like the main roadway, there was both a highway=crossing node (where the pedestrian crossing and highway intersect) and a highway=traffic_signals node (where the stop line physically is, along the highway or cycleway). 

The cycleway is separate from the footpath and separated from the roadway with a kerb and intermittent vegetation, just like the example on the wiki.
slice0 (2024-04-12 06:07:25+00:00): I made adjustments to the intersection and route here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149891968 I had to go to a building down the street this morning anyway so thought i would take a look at it. here is before and after of the edit and a photo i took myself of the intersection this morning. https://imgur.com/a/bOvCNhn
woodpeck_repair (2024-05-30 16:26:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152044355 where the changeset comment is: revert non-existant internet cafes along polish/ukrainian border, DWG Ticket #2024053010000317
Famlam (2024-03-31 20:45:13+00:00): Dag Hotel De Gulden Waagen,

Momenteel heeft u
name=Waagen Hotel Group
name:en=Hotel De Gulden Waagen
name:nl=De Bronzen Koets

Dit betekent:
Voor Nederlandstaligen heet het hotel "De Bronzen Koets"
Voor Engelstaligen heet het hotel "Hotel De Gulden Waagen"
Voor alle anderen heet het "Waagen Hotel Group"

Ik vermoed (mede op basis van uw beschrijving) dat dit niet juist is. Vermoedelijk bedoelt u:

operator=Waagen Hotel Group
name=Hotel De Gulden Waagen
alt_name=De Bronzen Koets

(brand i.p.v. operator zou ook kunnen kloppen als het een merknaam is)

Dit betekent:
Het hotel wordt door Waagen Hotel Group beheert, het heet "Hotel De Gulden Waagen", en een alternatieve naam is "De Bronzen Koets"

Klopt dit? Zo ja, kunt u dit dan corrigeren?


Daarnaast horen in Nederland de details van o.a. winkels/hotels/... op de adresknoop te staan, niet op het gebouw zelf. (Het gebouw verwijst puur naar de stenen, niet naar wat erin zit). Een deel staat al op de betreffende knoop (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4840112328) maar in deze wijzigingset is alles op het gebouw geplaatst.
Famlam (2024-03-31 20:45:25+00:00): *beheerd
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-03-31 22:44:30+00:00): Why multiple accounts?
Jerry_W2k (2024-04-04 12:55:49+00:00): Mam pewne wątpliwości czy Katedra Chemii https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6816700 i tereny wokół niej są parkiem
emersonveenstra (2024-04-01 11:25:24+00:00): Hi there,

Looks like this changeset broke https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/96843858, would you mind fixing it? Thanks!
citrula (2024-03-31 19:23:11+00:00): Please use the expanded form of the street suffix. (For example, "Draw Lp" should probably be "Draw Loop.") Happy mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149376416