piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Supaplex030 (2025-07-28 21:20:31+00:00): Hallo,

mehr oder weniger zufällig habe ich auch gerade entdeckt, dass fehlerhafte Parkraum-Tags gesetzt wurden (und ein paar falsche PLZ-Angaben) – korrigiert in https://osmcha.org/changesets/169637017.

Bitte bei den Parkraumtags mit großer Sorgfalt vorgehen, da das auch ein anderes aktuelles Berliner Mapping-Projekt betrifft, und nach Möglichkeit den JOSM-Style "Parkstreifen" zur visuellen Unterstützung nutzen.

Lg, Alex
ivanbranco (2025-07-24 21:10:33+00:00): Ciao Leonardo, 

purtroppo ho dovuto annullare questa modifica perchè era stata trascinate più strade sopra altre strade ed edifici. L'editor ha provato ad avvertirti con 36 segnalazioni. In questi casi è meglio fermarsi e cercare di capire il problema. Se hai bisogno di aiuto la comunità italiana di OpenStreetMap è disponibile.

Grazie e buon mapping
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-16 11:34:24+00:00): 

way/1021108434/history - what kind of traces remain here nowadays?

are there any?
Leo Slager (2025-07-17 23:00:23+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
felipeeugenio (2025-07-16 23:27:33+00:00): Nota resuelta #4859900
pitscheplatsch (2025-07-17 08:43:46+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169038712
Spush (2025-07-17 10:33:57+00:00): pet_grooming tag-et állatkozmetikákra alkalmazzuk. Minden más kisállatboltra shop=pet Köszi!
Ha valami csomagpont azt ne írd bele a névbe, mert hosszú lesz. Haszálj más tage-et pl.: description, note
Köszi! További jó szerkesztést!
Metzor (2025-07-17 05:32:35+00:00): Hi adster,

Please upload changes in uk and Australia separately. Thanks and
happy mapping
Metzor
user_5359 (2025-07-17 07:46:21+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database not a playground! I reverted your change set.
surveyor54 (2025-07-17 10:22:25+00:00): Hallo pandabear,
es gab vor einiger zeit im Forum ein Thema,

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/grenzrelation-und-place-node-gemeinden-eines-landkreises/85468

da war man sich eigentlich einig, dass der gemeindebezogene place-Node als label auf das Notwendigste reduziert werden soll.
(name=, place= und ggf. ein erläuternder note-Text). 
Alle Daten die das gesamte Gemeindegebiet betreffen werden der Grenzrelation zugeordnet.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Gemeindegrenze#Zusätzliche_Relationselemente

In diesem Fall haben wir ein Doppeleintrag des Wikidata-Tags, einaml in der Relation und am node. Das ist nicht gewollt.

Gruß
surveyor54
surveyor54 (2025-07-18 05:40:38+00:00): Hallo pandabear, 

es wäre schön, wenn du dich melden würdest und mir deinen Standpunkt erklärst, warum du weiterhin die unnötigen Wikidata-Tags  in  die Nodes einträgst, obwohl sie schon in der Relation eingetragen sind.

Gruß
surveyor54
pandabear (2025-07-18 09:27:49+00:00): OK, understood. I'll revert.
pandabear (2025-07-18 09:40:24+00:00): Wie kann ich Ortschaften wie diese mappen? Ich sehe keine Admin bounderies. https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/50.621411/7.969900&layers=N

Q135400266
pandabear (2025-07-18 10:05:10+00:00): Und ich habe aufgehört sobald ich von diesem Post erfahren habe
pandabear (2025-07-18 10:18:16+00:00): Mein REvert scheint nicht immer funktioniert zu haben. Was mache ich falsch? Bsp https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/869886071/history/7
pandabear (2025-07-18 10:20:53+00:00): found it
surveyor54 (2025-07-18 12:56:26+00:00): Danke und weiterhin frohes Mappen.

Gruß
surveyor54 👍 😄
b-jazz (2025-07-17 15:21:50+00:00): RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1415302516

Please don't share the nodes of the green if you have the fairway surrounding the green. If you can't see any fringe around the green, you should make the fairway butt up to the green and share the nodes on the boundary *between* the green and fairway instead. Please read the wiki for visual examples and instructions on how to better map golf courses: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls. If you have any questions, please let me know and I'll gladly help clarify things. Thanks!
fortera_au (2025-08-01 23:46:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 169841222, 169841249, 169841240, 169841260, 169841200, 169841256, 169841237, 169841215, 169841214, 169841228, 169841245, 169841232 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: incompatible source
Kovoschiz (2025-07-17 04:26:27+00:00): Please don't change entire buildings. It doesn't occupy all of it.
cubbe8 (2025-07-17 03:19:43+00:00): It is a trunk road based on the MA specific guidelines. Functional class 2. An expressway does not mean limited access.
cubbe8 (2025-07-17 03:23:50+00:00): Please stop
cubbe8 (2025-07-17 03:26:08+00:00): A trunk link has different classification than trunk road
andriu44 (2025-07-17 04:13:54+00:00): Route 99 should also be reclassified between Everett and Charlestown and over the Russel Bridge, as well. then
cubbe8 (2025-07-17 04:41:45+00:00): Trunk road must form a network with other trunk and motorways. That would end at a primary road which is incorrect
cubbe8 (2025-07-17 03:46:10+00:00): No this not correct please use the ma state guidelines under the state specific guidelines on the same page you are looking
cubbe8 (2025-07-17 03:46:29+00:00): A trunk road does not need expressway feature
cubbe8 (2025-07-17 03:47:56+00:00): The entirety or US 3 is a trunk road. It is a major route.
andriu44 (2025-07-17 04:10:40+00:00): That makes no sense - US3 and 2A are largely 2-lane primary arterials.
cubbe8 (2025-07-17 04:37:00+00:00): That does not matter. Under state specific classification guidelines on the 2021 classification page, Mass classification is based on mass GIs functional classification. There is a reference there to a discussion where this was widely supported.

https://gis.data.mass.gov/datasets/MassDOT::functional-classification/explore
fortera_au (2025-08-01 23:46:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 169841222, 169841249, 169841240, 169841260, 169841200, 169841256, 169841237, 169841215, 169841214, 169841228, 169841245, 169841232 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: incompatible source
Glassman (2025-07-17 21:38:05+00:00): Your edit allows motor vehicles on trails. Trails by definition in OSM are not suitable for cars or trucks. Please review this edit. Let me know if you need help. I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169040707
KnifeWrench (2025-07-18 00:17:11+00:00): Understood. I was editing them to reflects motorcycle usage, I assumed a motorcycle counted as a motor vehicle. I will leave the motorcycle tag and set motor vehicle access to "no".
Glassman (2025-07-18 00:23:13+00:00): Thanks for getting back to me. I know this is a big issue since the state and counties are still discussing motorized vehicles on trails now that we have electric bikes. BTW - did you know we have a tag dirtbike:scale to define the difficulty of the trail? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:dirtbike:scale
osmviborg (2025-07-17 05:38:07+00:00): Så må det være 'old_name', ikke 'alt_name'
Anders L (2025-07-17 05:42:37+00:00): Pladder. "Strandgården" bruges stadig i daglig tale. Det er mit lokalområde og jeg kommer der jævnligt. Lad venligst være med at være nedladende.
Anders L (2025-07-17 05:55:44+00:00): Bygningen og hele anlægget var oprindeligt en del af Ollerup Idrætshøjskole, og har navnet "Strandgården". Svendborg Sunds Sejlklub flyttede en del af sine aktiviteter derud i starten af 1970'erne da jeg sejlede optimistjolle, og senere overtog man hele anlægget og skiltet med "Svendborg Sunds Sejlklub" kom op.
osmviborg (2025-07-17 06:07:13+00:00): I så fald er 'name=Strandgården'. https://sss.dk/klubben/strandgaarden/
Anders L (2025-07-17 06:12:17+00:00): I løbet af tiden har nogen jo ændret navnet, og associeret bygningen med sejlklubben, så hvis navnet skal rettes, skal man repræsentere sejlklubben på anden vis, med en node?
osmviborg (2025-07-17 06:17:45+00:00): Lav et området, fra vejen og ned til kajkanten. Tag med relevante oplysninger, og lad selve bygninger hedde Strandgården.
Anders L (2025-07-17 06:43:27+00:00): Tak for hjælpen, jeg har nu gjort som du foreslog. Og opdaget at klubbens adresse, Rantzausmindevej 137, ikke findes som adressepunkt på OSM.
osmviborg (2025-07-17 06:46:42+00:00): Adressen skal du lige vende med kommunen. Der findes flere lodsejere i DK der selv har opfundet deres adresse!
evgenykatyshev (2025-07-23 14:28:27+00:00): I reverted it because changes isn't reflect the situation in the ground

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169348058
evgenykatyshev (2025-07-23 14:31:13+00:00): I reverted it because changes isn't reflect the situation in the ground

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169348190
NeisBot (2025-07-17 05:21:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-07-20 05:32:01+00:00): Corrected by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169046246
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-06 04:46:21+00:00): Consolidated and cleaned up remaining SEO spam tags for two POIs for Two Men and a Truck in San Antonio North in changeset 183722031

https://osm.org/changeset/183722031
aharvey (2025-07-17 06:12:04+00:00): Looks good. I fixed up a tag issue, in iD the tags input doesn't take the = sign, unless you change the tags input to text. I also fixed a typo in the value and added the operator:wikidata tag.

https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/83655247
Baloo Uriza (2025-07-18 13:29:23+00:00): Nope, wrong.  There's five lanes here.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169043263
rkothiyal_lyft (2025-07-23 04:18:57+00:00): 
Hi Baloo Uriza,

My name is Rohit, and I'm a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. Thank you for your comment.
As we already mentioned in the comment to this changeset
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167679825 
“Based on the wiki, we don’t include bike lanes in the lane count because the highway=* key is mainly used by motorized traffic.
osm.wiki/Lanes#Crossing_with_a_designated_lane_for_bicycles
However, based on the other article, your enhanced approach to tagging lanes is also applicable.
osm.wiki/Key:lanes#:~:text=lane%20for%20those.-,NOTE,-%3A%20Not%20settled%3B%20orthogonal
Given our understanding, both approaches can be used. Regarding turn lanes, according to our policy: https://github.com/Test-DCT/OSM-LYFT-DCT/blob/61f7554424aefbada1fde6d22fd71523c5f99d94/osmtrainingmaterialsfeatures/Turn%20Lanes.pdf, we add turn lane tags based on markings and signs. We do not include potential maneuvers, as in this case where you added the value "through;right"

Please let us know if you have any concerns about that. Happy mapping!
Baloo Uriza (2025-07-23 12:11:07+00:00): I do.  Explicit turn lane tagging is necessary and including bicycle lanes is necessary in order for existing data consumers to actually have a predictable and consistent result in the real world.  The wiki is about a decade behind reality on this.
rkothiyal_lyft (2025-07-28 11:09:28+00:00): Hi, Baloo Uriza

Thank you for your opinion regarding the tagging of lanes and turn lanes. If you believe any guidelines on the wiki are outdated or irrelevant, we encourage you to initiate discussions on community forum to clarify and recommend updates to the wiki based on your described approach. We are happy to participate and accept any final decisions on this matter. However, until then, we will continue to follow the rules outlined in the official wiki guidelines.

Best regards, Rohit
Baloo Uriza (2025-07-29 12:11:48+00:00): Thanks for the suggestion, we've tried that and it doesn't work.  I recommend you at least use an editor that visualizes the changes you're making, trying to edit lanes in id is really only for GIS professionals and Lyft's skill level is more "first time editor that never learns".
amakarevich_lyft (2025-07-31 10:06:19+00:00): Hi Baloo Uriza,

We’ve created a topic on OSM community forum to engage a wider discussion on this topic:

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/consensus-regarding-lane-and-turn-lane-tagging-guidelines/133364#:~:text=Currently%2C%20the%20wiki%20states

Best regards, Artem
yrtimiD (2025-07-18 02:25:29+00:00): ברוכים הבאים ותודה על תרומתך!
אתה הוספת כאן שם לפינה של הבניין הבת כנסת. האם רצית להוסיף פרטים לבת כנסת עצמו או לייצר אישות חדשה?
binyanzion (2025-07-20 06:04:56+00:00): נכון, כי הישיבה ממוקמת ממש באיזור זה. רציתי לייצר אישות חדשה שאליה אוכל להפנות מוויקפידה.
אתה יודע מה הלינק אליו אני יכול להפנות מוויקפדיה? כדי שתוצג המפה שלכם בדף וויקי?
yrtimiD (2025-07-20 12:21:00+00:00): אני מבין, אז שווה להוסיף תיוג של 
amenity=school
אחרת זה נקודה ללא כול סיווג

לגבי הפנייה מויקיפדיה - אני לא חושב שאפשר להפנות לאישות אלה רק למיקום 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template%3ACoord
Udarian (2025-07-17 21:00:14+00:00): are you sure that "HoneyBee Doughnuts" no longer exists as you seem to contributing all over the place.
WebmasterStart (2025-07-17 22:36:24+00:00): Yes, "HoneyBee Doughnuts" has been closed for over 2 years, it is a new business now "Moi Peruvian Homemade Bakery"
MomentSkiGuy (2025-07-17 17:38:08+00:00): Do you have any idea how irresponsible it is to publicly map this trail?
Going through and adding every line you see on the strava heat map isnt helpful to anyone.
eerib (2025-07-17 17:41:48+00:00): See duplicate discussion on this changeset.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169034750
Comino (2025-07-17 18:26:35+00:00): Hi Bitcoin Diary,

In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes".

Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag !
Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead.

For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Merchants#legacy-tags
and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bitcoin

Happy mapping,

Edwin
user_21183540 (2025-07-17 08:31:50+00:00): Hey, I noticed that you removed shop names while adding shop types. Was this intentional?
ANMapEnjoyer (2025-07-20 05:18:25+00:00): Hi-sorry, no it wasn't. The names appeared to be correct while I was surveying. I've added them back
Alafoss (2025-07-18 01:21:23+00:00): Helllo,
why did you delete the steam Lightning Gully? Cheers
gipps75 (2025-07-18 02:29:47+00:00): Did I? I don’t remember doing that, it doesn’t seem to appear so I must’ve.
Rukkhadevata (2025-07-17 07:29:46+00:00): Hi katpatuka,
in China, Chinese is the official language, so it should take precedence over any other language in all situations, including Tibetan, such as "name=彭错 ཕུ་མཚོ།".
If you think another labeling method would be better, we can discuss it.
katpatuka (2025-07-17 08:12:31+00:00): Hello Rukkhadevata,

Thanks for your feedback. I'm not a Chinese citizen so in my eyes Tibet is 'occupied' by China. The official Chinese line is of course 'Tibet belongs to China'.

I only changed the naming of lakes and monasteries in the way "Tibetan name" SPACE "Chinese name" but did not change any settlement names in that way because all settlement administration are under Chinese control.

If there ever will exist a special "openstreetmap.cn" website (which I do not expect to happen in the near future) its maintainers could easily replace the name tag by replacing it with the name:zh tag anyway.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-07-17 08:37:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 169049236 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Pokemon Go beaches
custodiankeyy (2025-07-17 20:44:43+00:00): Tekrar merhaba. Geçen sefer belirtmiş olmama rağmen yine haritalandırdığınız elementin alanının dışına çıkmışsınız. Örneğin pazar yeri ve Ulu Cami. Ulu cami için bina neresi ise orayı haritalandırmaya çalışın. Eğer pazar yeri otoparkı kullanıyorsa opening_hours etiketi ile tekrar düzenleyin. Ayrıca BİM ve A101 gibi ünlü marketler hazır şablon olarak iD Editör üzerinde bulunmakta, direkt onları kullanabilirsiniz.
---
Hello again. Although I pointed it out last time, you have again gone outside the area of the element you mapped. For example the marketplace and the Ulu Cami. Try to map wherever the building is for the Ulu Cami. If the marketplace uses the parking lot, reorganize it with the opening_hours tag. In addition, famous markets such as BİM and A101 are available on the iD Editor as ready-made templates, you can use them directly.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169079613
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169080081
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-07-17 08:37:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 169049236 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Pokemon Go beaches
Kiesgenießer (2025-07-24 20:50:49+00:00): Hallo Tatfahren,
findest du nicht, dass einzelne private Pools zu mappen etwas invasiv ist?
Ich glaube dieser Detailgrad an privaten Objekten schadet vlt. auf längere Sicht dem Ruf von osm.
Ich habe nichts gegen building=house oder building=shed aber ob jemand einen Pool im Hintergarten hat ist schon eine besondere Information.
Nakaner (2025-07-24 22:00:58+00:00): Hallo Kiesgenießer,

tatfahren ist nicht der erste, der private Pools mappt. Sie sollten dann aber mit access=private getaggt sein.

@tatfahren leisure=swimming_pool wäre besser als natural=water + water=pond.

Viele Grüße

Michael
Tatfahren (2025-07-25 08:23:51+00:00): Die beiden mit natural=pond sehen im Luftbild eher aus wie Gartenteiche, weshalb ich die ohne Ortskenntnisse lieber nicht zu swimming_pool ändern möchte.
sw_uwu (2025-07-19 15:05:05+00:00): Hi, wieso hast du das entfernt?
opendcc (2025-07-20 17:28:53+00:00): Der entrance hatte keinen gültigen Tag, es gibt keinen Weg. imho wirklich overtagging ...
sw_uwu (2025-07-20 17:45:01+00:00): Naja also aus der Wiki für den entrance-key kann man lesen: "Der Schlüssel entrance=* beschreibt den Eingang zu einem Gebäude oder einer umschlossenen Fläche".
Daher ist das schon korrekt, und das Konzept https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Any_tags_you_like trifft hier meiner Meinung nach perfekt zu.

Ich sehe keinen Grund, Details aus OSM herauszunehmen, nur weil sie sehr spezifische oder kleine Anwendungszwecke haben.
sw_uwu (2025-07-20 17:45:20+00:00): Referenzbild:
https://www.stadtwerke-sw.de/_Resources/Persistent/5/0/4/f/504f5b2d55af7cb6b792a826bee6445dac7cc88d/SILVANA-Hallenbad3_Hintergrundbild_1024x683-1024x536.jpg
opendcc (2025-07-20 18:50:58+00:00): Das ist doch kein 'Eingang', über den man regulär das Gebäude betritt. Das ist eine Öffnung, die inneren und äußeren Schwimmbereich verbindet. Analog hierzu: der Wasserauslaß bei einem Mühlengebäude. Eingänge kann man typischerweise irgendwie mit Verkehrswegen erreichen - was hier ja für die anderen Entrances schon so erfüllt ist. Für mich ist das 'eine' Gebäudeöffnung (eher vergleichbar einem Fenster) denn eine EinGANGstür.
CAM-Gerlach (2026-05-28 02:14:03+00:00): Changeset 169067912 fixed the rest of the SEO spam; I fixed the invalid building=* tag in changeset 183281677

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169067912

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183281677
literan (2025-08-23 10:47:58+00:00): не надо писать в поле "название" текстовые описания объектов, вроде "Автомат по продаже билетов".

это поле для имен собственных
literan (2025-08-23 10:48:07+00:00): кавычки тоже не надо ставить
fortera_au (2025-08-01 23:47:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 169841222, 169841249, 169841240, 169841260, 169841200, 169841256, 169841237, 169841215, 169841214, 169841228, 169841245, 169841232 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: incompatible source
Martinligabue (2025-07-18 08:52:59+00:00): annullo perché son stati rimossi dei civici in realtà esistenti

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169097434
Martinligabue (2025-07-18 08:54:38+00:00): l'attività è solo una

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169097506
LachlanTansey2009 (2025-07-18 09:26:10+00:00): Thanks for fixing this, sorry I didn't reply to any of your comments.
NeisBot (2025-07-17 08:30:46+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
pitscheplatsch (2025-07-23 07:14:12+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/169327006
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-07-17 08:37:21+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 169046338, 169046470, 169046507, 169046552, 169046578, 169046884.
limes11 (2025-07-17 08:59:08+00:00): Moin, 

wieso amenity=school ? 

Mag ID kein amenity=kindergarten ?

VG
pitfire (2025-07-17 09:51:40+00:00): Hi Limes, leider im falschen Moment geändert. Hatte Gebäude und Parkplätze angepasst und dabei irgenwann wohl den ID Vorschlag bestätigt. Ändere ich wieder. 
VG pitfire
amosharper (2025-08-01 09:34:11+00:00): This change resulted in the deletion of the caves under White Rock. These caves took a long time and a lot of research to accurately map. Please be more careful about what you delete when changing the map. Thank you.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1302013872/history
amosharper (2025-08-01 09:49:43+00:00): I've manually reinstated the deleted caves in change https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169808310. I can't overstate how frustrating, despiriting, and exhausting it is to find that another mapper has deleted things you spent time implementing.
Bartek444 (2025-07-19 17:51:22+00:00): taka drobna uwaga jakbyś miał podobne dodawać: to jest appkomat
app_operated=only
brand=Appkomat InPost
brand:wikidata=Q130375314
NeisBot (2025-07-17 09:30:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
pitscheplatsch (2025-07-23 07:14:39+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/169327022
Carto'Cité (2026-03-03 14:48:34+00:00): Bonjour.
Cette modification a eu pour effet de remplacer tous les nodes de https://www.osm.org/way/1009975117. Cela a pour conséquence de déconnecter les cheminements et surfaces routables, ce qui peut causer des problèmes pour les calculs d'itinéraires.
Est-ce que c'était ton intention, et dans ce cas pour quelle raison ? 
Cordialement,
Antoine de Carto’Cité pour SNCF #Transilien
Kovoschiz (2025-07-18 05:55:50+00:00): Why are they deleted? If they are still reserved, they should be changed to `proposed:highway=` , not deleted.
Tangot (2025-07-19 02:52:32+00:00): They are decomissioned at the end of 2024 and no longer exist. Additionally, the parts on south perimeter road never existed thus deleted
Kovoschiz (2025-07-19 04:17:59+00:00): You have obviously misunderstood this. They have been `=construction` from start. It's extending the road to 3rd Runway area.
Tangot (2025-07-19 06:05:23+00:00): yes,they have been `=construction` from start. and it have changed as of the end of 2024 due to the opening of the center rwy/NAT. the construction road have been reduced and the construction Gatehouse 10 enterence have been moved. there would never be a HIGHWAY on the  GRASS going into the RESTRICTED AREA