piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Oleg_1094 (2024-05-01 10:15:25+00:00): Hey, sorry, I was unsure about how to classify them, thanks for making it clear
SomeoneElse (2024-04-30 21:53:01+00:00): 15/4/2024, ts0850b
notmyproblem1 (2025-09-02 15:45:41+00:00): ciao caro, la strada che hai aggiunto tra il centro commerciale muggiò e L'aprochimide (Strada di Servizio) non esiste perchè sembra che da Mapbox Satellite (cioè, la strada è quella già mappata)

ti scrivo per farti capire che ho cancellato la strada, se hai qualche problema o qualche domanda rispondimi pure!
DomKor (2025-09-07 12:59:50+00:00): detto sicneramente non ho capito di quale strada tu stia parlando
DomKor (2025-09-07 13:04:55+00:00): Ho cercato su OSMcha e ho finalemtne capito era sicuramente un errore durante la mappatura quindi tutto apposto
Saudi_Gns_import (2024-05-02 07:20:01+00:00): see:
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2024-April/thread.html
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/GNS_Import_for_Yemen_and_Others
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-06 20:11:57+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150981629
Ewrt1 (2024-05-01 03:28:50+00:00): Evpac99, the coca-cola stage is not there. It's too small of a space. :)
Ewrt1 (2024-05-01 03:30:19+00:00): Also, you added a footway/steps/bridge to Hall C. It doesn't exist on aerial imagery. Where is it??
hoserab (2024-05-01 22:09:55+00:00): It seems very obvious to me that Evpac99—and their myriad aliases—are working off of old info. The Coke Stage is now just a temporary stage, only in place for the 10 days' worth of Stampede. Same with Nashville North, and neither is shown in the location they were last year. I wouldn't even map them.

The bridge to Hall C of the BMO Centre was demolished a couple years ago, because the Victoria Park C-Train station was demolished, and the bridge across Macleod Trail was demolished. The second-storey entrance to Hall C *doesn't exist* anymore, that part of the building is GONE.

Frankly I don't trust that anything this user touches is accurate, and I think all of their changes should be reverted on sight.
hoserab (2024-05-01 22:21:35+00:00): FYI I've reported the user twice to the DWG, with no action yet.
woodpeck_repair (2024-04-30 22:11:24+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 150717887, 150721947, 150722060, 150722188, 150722587, 150722722, 150722915, 150723000, 150723070, 93690360, 96696347.
SomeoneElse (2024-04-30 23:44:03+00:00): From survey 28/4/2024, ts0874b
impiaaa (2024-05-01 17:53:49+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thanks for contributing! The extra information is appreciated. My only bit of feedback would actually be the change message—this field is your chance to summarize to other mappers what you changed and why. Something like, "Added address and payment methods to an ice cream shop from local knowledge."
Ruediger123 (2024-05-01 10:29:38+00:00): hot
LucGommans (2024-05-01 00:02:12+00:00): Hi, thanks for adding the path! (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1278644243)

Are you sure this is a highway=track though? That tag is meant for "minor land-access roads that are not considered part of the general-purpose road network" (see the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtrack). This path looks like it runs past buildings, so something like highway=residential might be more appropriate maybe?
Lelio Alves (2024-05-30 15:38:16+00:00): Good Job, Keep Mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150730573
Lelio Alves (2024-05-30 15:38:05+00:00): Good Job, Keep Mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150730623
CurlingMan13 (2024-05-01 06:39:01+00:00): Good catch.  Make sure you report this golf vandal to DWG.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150730858
CasperGeo (2024-06-11 10:40:38+00:00): Hi Ayesha, please note that buildings need to me mapped individually. Most of your area features actually contain multiple buildings. thanks for your efforts.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150730869
Lelio Alves (2024-05-30 15:36:24+00:00): Good Job, Keep Mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150730922
0xb7767000 (2024-08-21 14:21:49+00:00): Moin,
du hast bei diesen beiden "Hecken" etwas gefettfingert ;)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1278648504
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1278648505
Dantine (2024-05-01 01:28:54+00:00): Thanks!
Lelio Alves (2024-05-30 15:31:01+00:00): Good Job, Keep going
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150731160
AndresDuhour (2026-07-04 13:45:10+00:00): Hola! observo muchos cambios donde el nombre se integra con el nombre de la ruta nacional y el nombre dado por el gobierno local. En las imágenes más actuales (https://panoramax.libre.net.ar) se puede ver que el nombre es Avenida Uruguay. El nombre de la ruta nacional 38 es Monseñor Angelelli, por lo que se dan problemas de concordancia entre nombres a lo largo de la ruta y con las direcciones de cada localidad. Voy a hacer una corrección agregando el nombre de la ruta nacional en alt_name.
Saudi_Gns_import (2024-05-02 07:20:16+00:00): see:
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2024-April/thread.html
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/GNS_Import_for_Yemen_and_Others
NeisBot (2024-05-01 01:34:03+00:00): Hello Peter_Otp, thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.Please see https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 

Thanks!

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
MxxCon (2024-05-03 21:01:02+00:00): Hello.
When mapping bus stops, or other features for that mapper, please pay attention not to connect/glue them to each other unless they are actually connected. A bus stop is not part of the sidewalk itself, therefore it should not be connected to the sidewalk.
A bus stop pin should be positioned either at the shelter, or if there isn't one, where a pole is/across from where a bus normally stops.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150731793
Patchanka (2024-05-01 11:35:56+00:00): bonjour
j'ai vu que vous ajoutez des parcelles avec le tag landuse=residential. 
Ce n'est pas le bon tag pour une parcelle, c'est place=plot.
Voir ce qu'en dit le wiki :
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:place%3Dplot
Quel est l'objectif de ces modifications ? Cela ressemble à de la cartographie pour le rendu (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/images/8/87/Les_10_cOSMandements.pdf).
Pontius (2024-05-10 05:58:44+00:00): Nice work finishing (or nearly finishing) Vermilion County!
BubbaJuice (2024-05-29 15:20:36+00:00): What's your source for the refs of some of these power towers?
For example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/688865222
NeisBot (2024-05-01 02:34:03+00:00): Hello Tsaniya, thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.Please see https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 

Thanks!

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-06 05:27:12+00:00): Thank you for mapping. It would be really helpful if you could avoid mass modification and add why you have modified in the changeset comment. Happy mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150732243
Minh Nguyen (2024-05-02 22:53:18+00:00): This self-storage facility has multiple buildings. You can classify the buildings as being of type “storage”, but only a single feature should be tagged as a Storage Rental facility. Changeset 150814304 draws an area around the site and tags it as Storage Rental.
joel56dt (2024-05-01 16:22:33+00:00): Was this checked recently? The road was completely closed early in April.

Thanks, joel56dt
grawat_Lyft (2024-05-06 12:47:58+00:00): Hi, joel56dt!
My name is Gaurav and I’m a mapper in the OSM team at Lyft. The edits were made based on the fresh Lyft-owned street view images (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Am0mcitkTs3axObjF04N9H0gFbbJ683r/view?usp=drive_link ) taken from Gilmore Avenue northbound (49.2647311, -123.0140327) dated 2024-04-19 (while the construction tag was added on 2024-04-05), where it is visible that the road is open for the traffic. Also we have the very active drivers GPS traces present in this area (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1JOzg3XprOWr_llhuMjt59yLRxKohvaAc/view?usp=drive_link ). So based on this evidence I decided to remove the construction tag.
Best regards!
joel56dt (2024-05-06 15:01:04+00:00): That's awesome, I didn't know you had such resources available to you. This is great. I appreciate your work updating this.

Thanks,
joel56dt
Masyas (2024-05-02 01:26:40+00:00): 请提供一些“怀德快速路”的出处
empty_child (2024-05-01 09:58:26+00:00): building:min_level preferable than layer
And local names too
Ruslan Fatih (2024-12-09 14:52:41+00:00): А откуда здесь отбойник?
Ruslan Fatih (2024-08-20 05:07:35+00:00): Зачем съезды нарисованы будто это отдельные физические съезды? Это же простые X образные перекрестки?
miluethi (2024-05-01 13:14:16+00:00): Hi Sol,

Thank you for adding and updating buildings in La Libertad. 

Please square out buildings whenever possible. Just press the "Q" key in the iD editor and it creates "nice and clean shapes".

Again, thank you for contributing to OSM Nicaragua.
Saudi_Gns_import (2024-05-02 07:20:19+00:00): see:
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2024-April/thread.html
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/GNS_Import_for_Yemen_and_Others
Tomas_J (2024-05-14 20:50:37+00:00): Hi, thank you for your contribution to the Openstreetmap. You have tagged this (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1225939459) as a waterway=track. I corrected to the highway=track.

Best regards Tomas
Ewrt1 (2024-05-01 04:45:22+00:00): I also added some detours
MxxCon (2024-05-03 21:10:51+00:00): Hello.
This place changed its name but kept the same phone number and website? Is that accurate?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150733520
Vivek Dumre (2024-05-23 15:13:43+00:00): Good and accurate mapping.#OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150733612
muralito (2024-05-01 17:42:48+00:00): Hola. Más alla de los titulos que ostenta quien da nombre a la calle, esos titulos o nombres completos solo se ponen en la etiqueta nombre si efectivamente forman parte del nombre de la calle, que no es lo mismo que el nombre de la persona. Habria que ver que dice la cartelería o como se conoce la calle en la zona. La etiqueta para poner el nombre de la persona es "name:etymology". Ver https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:name:etymology
PengualaHeadphones (2024-05-03 09:19:15+00:00): Please take note that the buildings are not accurate because of outdated satellite image.
relaemanila (2024-05-08 13:10:52+00:00): Hello,

I heard that you might need the latest satellite image that you can draw buildings. You can use Copernicus Browser to use that image as a source to draw highways, and buildings.
ratrun (2024-05-02 15:35:45+00:00): Hello,

please stop duplicating highways just for tagging cycling information where separate cycling infrastructure is already mapped. I'm going to remove those duplications soon.
thanks
ratrun
Hannah_F_ (2024-05-02 22:50:29+00:00): Hello Ratrun,

I'm not sure what you mean by "duplicating highways". Could you please explain further?

I believe I have tagged significant changes in on-road cycling infrastructure (such as traffic on both sides of the cycling lane or the beginning and end of cycling lanes) as guided by the Melbourne Bike Lane Project: (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Melbourne_Bike_Lane_Project). 

Thanks,
Hannah
ratrun (2024-05-03 05:10:26+00:00): Hello Hannah,

here is one example: Your duplicated new way is this one: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1278694757 , but this road is already mapped here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/671789980#map=17/-37.82372/144.67432 . There are three problems with this approach: the road is duplicated, the cycleway tags are redundant as this cycleway is already explicitly mapped here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/970925776#map=18/-37.82130/144.67459 and last the duplicated way is unconnected to the rest.  Therefore errors are displayed on the OSM inspector routing view page, see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=144.76128&lat=-37.73940&zoom=10&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=unconnected_open_ends_1

thanks
ratrun
Hannah_F_ (2024-05-03 06:12:22+00:00): Hi Ratrun,

The road has not been duplicated. I have only added tags to the existing road section to describe the on-road cycling lane. 

This is not the same as the off-road cycle path that runs parallel to the road. 

The tags on the road feature are describing the cycling lane painted on the road surface.

I hope this helps,
Hannah
ratrun (2024-05-03 06:37:55+00:00): Hi Hannah,
thanks for your explanation. Now that you pointed me on it I could spot the cycle markings on the road surface via the Bing images. But you did duplicate the roads as explained above. Otherwise I wouldn't have spotted your changes. You can see it when you closely watch in JOSM by zooming in very closely. I would have now enough information that I could fix those mistakes from remote, but it would be better if you could to that as it seems that you know these locations.
SpecializedRider (2024-06-04 08:48:52+00:00): I'm also finding this as well. For example https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1278695637 has no history other than creation of the way by yourself and it's not in the correct relation anymore. I understand it might be unintentional but there's almost never a reason to delete data and then recreate it. We don't want to discourage new editors like yourself from contributing, however the work does need to be correctly to avoid creating extra work for others. I would suggest doing your work in separate much smaller changesets to avoid losing all your work if your changesets are later reversed to preserve data integrity. Also noting I've previously raised this issue on a separate changeset of yours. Thanks
SpecializedRider (2024-06-04 09:25:19+00:00): Additional comment/proof: In the list below, you will see "v1" next to hundreds of items, which means it is a brand new item in this changeset. I'm not sure why this is occurring , but please find a different way of working to avoid this, otherwise future change sets will simply be reversed.
aharvey (2024-12-04 00:00:49+00:00): I've cleaned up a few of these and this one. It does appear Hannah you're working with the best intentions to improve the tagging, but the way you've made these changes has introduced data issues due to the duplication of the ways. In JOSM what you'll need to do is add a node to the existing way (shortcut key is A), then press escape to stop it from continuing it as a way. You can now swap back to select mode (shortcut key is S), and select the node you added on the way, then under Tools > Split way. You'll now have split the way and can set different tags for the different segments. I believe this is what you've been trying to do .
zzcolin (2024-08-18 09:11:12+00:00): 请遵照名称规范，name 属性在中国大陆非少数民族地区只能放简体中文名称，实地展示的英语名称请放入 name:en。
Baloo Uriza (2024-06-14 15:47:09+00:00): "April 2024 Central US Tornado Damage" is a highly unlikely name.  Perhaps you meant description=* or some other field?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150735285
Supaplex (2024-05-01 11:10:24+00:00): There is already a FamilyMart there. I have removed the duplicated one
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150735338
GOwin (2024-05-02 00:37:12+00:00): https://osmcha.org/changesets/150735338 🙏
Saudi_Gns_import (2024-05-02 07:20:23+00:00): see:
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2024-April/thread.html
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/GNS_Import_for_Yemen_and_Others
Leo Slager (2024-05-01 10:23:28+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Galbinus (2024-05-01 19:38:05+00:00): Wieso hast Du Teilflächen des NRW-Staatswaldes aus der Relation gelöscht? Das riecht für mich nach Vandalismus.
Amenophis (2024-05-01 19:46:27+00:00): Da liegst Du falsch. Vandalismus ist mir fremd. Welche Teilflächen meinst Du denn? Ich habe heute einige Korrekturen vorgenommen, bin aber aus Zeitgründen nicht ganz fertig geworden.
Galbinus (2024-05-03 17:36:08+00:00): z.B. hast Du bei dieser Linie die Eigenschaft "boundary=forest" entfernt und die Zuordnung zu der Relation 17271667 entfernt.
Galbinus (2024-05-03 17:38:26+00:00): ... und das gilt für einige Staatsforstflächen sowohl im südlichen als auch im nördlichen Eggegebirge. 
Wieso hast Du diese Linien in größerem Umfang aus der Relation entfernt?
Amenophis (2024-05-03 19:03:26+00:00): Ok, dann hole ich mal kurz etwas aus.

Vor einigen Tagen erhielt ich vom Mapper kartler175 folgenden Hinweis: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150465315#map=13/51.6826/9.0310 Dabei ging es um das Naturschutzgebiet Gradberg und zum damaligen Zeitpunkt zeigte der Aufruf von https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=9.04278&lat=51.68813&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.95&overlays=intersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cways zahlreiche sich überschneidende Segmente ("intersecting segments"). Ob die von mir oder von einem vorherigen Mapper stammten, vermag ich gar nicht zu sagen.

Jedenfalls habe ich mich daran gemacht, diese "intersecting segments" zu bereinigen, was wohl auch geklappt hat, da diese im Geofabrik OSM Inspector nun nicht mehr angezeigt werden. Bei dieser Bereinigung habe ich einige Punkte von vorhandenen Linien getrennt sowie Wege getrennt und andere miteinander verbunden. Hierbei habe ich mich auch um eine saubere Abbildung der Staatsforstflächen gemäß Waldinfo.NRW sowie die korrekte Zuordnung zur und Anordnung in der Relation bemüht.

Was mir jetzt noch nicht klar ist: Habe ich aus Deiner Sicht in dem Zusammenhang irgendwelche Staatsforstflächen, die vorher eingetragen waren, gelöscht und diese fehlen seitdem in der Karte oder der genannten Relation? Sollte das der Fall sein, war es jedenfalls unbeabsichtigt und ich mache mich dann selbstverständlich gerne an die Arbeit, diese Flächen wiederherzustellen.
Galbinus (2024-05-03 19:13:43+00:00): Als ich die Flächen eingezeichnet hatte, gab es keine Überschneidungen etc. - das hatte ich alles sauber über den OSM-Inspektor geprüft. Die Fehler muss demnach später jemand hinzugefügt haben. 
Ja, Du hast einige Flächen aus der Relation geschmissen. Die eine Fläche hatte ich Dir ja schon vorhin verlinkt. Wenn ich jetzt alle anderen auch heraussuche, werde ich sie der Einfachheit gleich selber wieder der Relation hinzufügen.
Galbinus (2024-05-03 20:08:50+00:00): Sooo - jetzt müssten wieder alle Flächen Teil der Relation sein.
Amenophis (2024-05-03 20:13:52+00:00): Vielen Dank! Es war wirklich keine böse Absicht und tut mir sehr leid.
fortera_au (2024-05-01 07:25:52+00:00): Looking at this, this should probably be a service road, seems more like a small break area than a full road. An unclassified road is equivalent to a residential road in OSM.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150735885
JiafuYang (2024-05-01 07:35:42+00:00): Has changed the type to a service road.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150735885
fortera_au (2024-05-01 07:45:01+00:00): Thanks!
Vivek Dumre (2024-05-23 15:11:48+00:00): Good and accurate mapping.#OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150735960
NorthCrab_upload (2024-05-01 07:00:14+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4422962834

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Vivek Dumre (2024-05-12 04:23:19+00:00): Your mapping looks accurate, thank you for mapping .#OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150736024
NorthCrab_upload (2024-05-01 07:10:20+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1278715882

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2024-05-01 07:10:19+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4422962834

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/878196021

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2024-05-01 07:30:26+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11871172077
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/878196050

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2024-05-01 07:30:27+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11871048833

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
impiaaa (2024-05-01 17:50:38+00:00): Why did you undo this one? natural=sand makes more sense than landuse=sand
KingVik (2024-05-01 21:31:06+00:00): Sorry my bad, I will fix it up
Thanks for reaching out to me.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-05-01 07:30:28+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11871141858

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Vivek Dumre (2024-05-23 15:08:47+00:00): Good Mapping with good changeset comment.#OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150736734
Kovoschiz (2024-05-01 11:41:24+00:00): Please don't delete shops with addresses. Change them to a plain "point".
Vivek Dumre (2024-05-12 04:25:15+00:00): Thank you for the accurate mapping.#OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150736806
HellMap (2024-05-03 14:51:20+00:00): Hi!

Just letting you know that this road was correctly specified as an unclassified road. It leads to a couple properties and connects different roads, so  its purpose is not a track (which is mainly for land access like fields and forests without anything like residences or farmyards).

Thanks
bmiww (2024-05-03 15:02:57+00:00): Ah, thanks for correcting it.
VlIvYur (2024-05-10 12:27:00+00:00): Hello
Where did you get speed limits for exits and ramps like this https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/278397243 ? I don't believe that curves have the same speed limit as main road
wkdgs (2024-05-03 10:09:06+00:00): Der Tag opening_hours:kitchen ist noch auf dem alten Stand. Kannst du den noch anpassen oder entfernen?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150737809
Wochenrückblick (2024-05-03 10:32:57+00:00): Ah jo. Wurde nun bereits entfernt. Ich kenne die neuen Zeiten auch nicht.