piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
alexwohlbruck (2026-06-11 16:45:37+00:00): The businesses you are adding to the map are non-verifiable or duplicate businesses nodes. Please carefully review the edits you are making to the map and verify that the places exist on-site. I have removed this node and the duplicate club west brewing
Rockedf (2026-06-11 20:58:51+00:00): Hi, thank you for the verification. 

If you believe it’s appropriate and you’ve seen with your own eyes that the business BizzyBee International doesn’t exist at that address, on that day, and at that time, then it’s fine to remove it.  

The data source used to add the node is the Square payments processor, which has verified that each added node matches the data issued by the businesses. You can follow the link to the changes and you’ll see the data source.  

Have a good day.
alexwohlbruck (2026-06-11 22:25:15+00:00): If this is the case, it was likely a popup store from the farmer's market that appears in this location on saturdays. The farmer's market can be mapped but individual popup shops are discouraged from mapping on osm
https://southendmkt.com/
Rockedf (2026-06-11 23:06:44+00:00): Yes, that seems to be the case.

It is a business that only appears during the hours and at the location indicated by the node.

I cannot find anything in the OSM guidelines stating that this type of individual business should not be mapped if it complies with the rules. It is a farm stand (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dfarm) which can be located with defined opening hours.

In the case of a Street Vendor (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:street_vendor%3Dyes), it would have almost the same requirements, such as opening hours at the location, but this tag is used more for food trucks. Anyway, in this particular case, the street vendor tag can be added. 

I used the farm stand node since it is an agricultural stand and not a fast-food one.

Best regards.
NeisBot (2026-04-09 20:36:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13719489534 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Real estate office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-17 22:33:18+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181478905
(Delete spam tags. First version)
CAM-Gerlach (2026-05-26 02:26:34+00:00): Removed additional SEO spam tagging and nonsensical name=* addition to the end of a way in changeset 183183370

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183183370
eggie (2026-04-10 07:38:49+00:00): Dag kOSMofant,

Lijkt me oke..  Je zou ook de voorgaande mapper kunnen vragen. 
de Rooy Transport & Logistiek B.V. staat ook nog eens op de gebouwomtrek. Dat zou thuishoren op de adresnode.

Ik heb de info verplaatst naar een aangemaakte adresnode.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-04-10 07:42:55+00:00): Hoi,
Het adres was niet compleets . Poi verplaatst naar gebouw met compleet adres.
Wellicht is Every Door niet de ideale editor. 

MVG
eggie
kOSMofant (2026-04-12 08:50:41+00:00): Bedankt. Klopt dat EveryDoor niet ideaal is als editor. Tegelijkertijd heb ik nog geen handiger (iOS) app gezien om onderweg snel en gebruiksvriendelijk bij te houden of een bedrijf ergens nog zit. Vaak doe ik daarna, voorafgaand aan upload, nog snelle check op website en soms openingstijden. Alleen bestaande amenity op gebouw ipv adres glipt er dan inderdaad gemakkelijk tussendoor. Probeer ik op te letten, maar zelfs als bedrijf onjuist op gebouw- ipv adresnode blijft staan, lijkt het me beter als het verder wel weer actueel is.
eggie (2026-04-12 09:11:21+00:00): Dat is zeker zo..!
eggie (2026-04-09 20:40:41+00:00): commentaar moet zijn. ...bicycle= no verwijderd
NeisBot (2026-04-09 20:42:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13680155685 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Bar and Grill"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-17 22:33:21+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181478906
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
NeisBot (2026-04-09 20:48:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13680054598 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Boutique clothing store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-17 22:33:24+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181478908
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
NeisBot (2026-04-09 20:51:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13682460433 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Orthodontic office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-17 22:33:27+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181478910
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-01 11:03:54+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags/values in changeset 184907746

https://osm.org/changeset/184907746
NeisBot (2026-04-09 20:57:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13678984385 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Barbershop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-17 22:33:29+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181478913
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
NeisBot (2026-04-09 20:57:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 12 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/4791706 v32 | 12 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=181117230
BoydMoffat (2026-04-09 22:31:06+00:00): Hi, yes. I can see some issues, I think it best to revert this entirely and leave a note to fix once the full extent has been captured better in terms of where the fence is. A separate change captures that the path is now unusable.
Can you point me at the best way to revert the change set?
NeisBot (2026-04-09 21:00:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13679274252 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Women's accessory store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-17 22:33:32+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181478915
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
kabelhaai (2026-04-12 19:51:08+00:00): 1. gelieve population enkel op boundaries te zetten en niet op place nodes. Zelfde voor de postcodes op place nodes. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Belgium/Conventions/Places#Other_tags
2. Alle place nodes van voormalige gemeenten - nu deelgemeenten/stadsdistricten werden als borough gezien en niet als town/village. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/26355164/history/26 waarom dit aanpassen?
3. de place= van bezali en borgerhout staan op een plaats waar geen enkel huis staat (een centrale plaats). Dit lijkt misschien goed (voor de render) maar voor data users is dit verkeerde informatie. Bijvoorbeeld Pajottenland gebruikt nu place=municipality om dit te voorkomen. Dit moet worden opgelost, bestaat nog geen oplossing voor. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/193872743
TuAmigoElEditor (2026-05-18 04:18:13+00:00): Hi accidentally you moved the node of "Pueblo Libre" 50km away from its location. Don't worry i'll fix it
NeisBot (2026-04-09 21:18:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13719589214 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Real estate office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-17 22:33:35+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181478916
(Delete spam tags. First version)
CAM-Gerlach (2026-05-26 02:28:49+00:00): Removed additional SEO spam and promotional tagging from POI in changeset 183183436

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183183436
NeisBot (2026-04-09 21:21:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13679299546 v4

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Furniture store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-17 22:33:38+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181478917
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
clay_c (2026-05-18 02:34:47+00:00): Hi nickvet419,

A lot of tracks appear to have been changed from operator="BNSF Railway" to operator="BNFS;Metra". Looking past the typo, the tracks in this yard are maintained and dispatched by BNSF Railway, not by Metra. Please revert these changes.
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-10 04:49:30+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

Could you share more context or a source for this change? "Centro Integral Naturales" and "Aroa´s Restaurante Cafetería" seem to describe different kinds of places, and the tagging also does not appear to match cleanly, so a reference would help verify both the name and the feature classification.

Thanks
felipeeugenio (2026-04-10 13:02:54+00:00): Corregido... supongo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181118093
clay_c (2026-05-18 02:34:50+00:00): Hi nickvet419,

Why was it necessary to delete this node, if you ended up recreating it two days later [1]? In the future, please "keep the history" [2] when editing.

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181173139

[2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history
nickvet419 (2026-05-18 22:21:51+00:00): Merged the original nodes with the areas and added additional details. another user commented that the yards vanished off of the openrailmap.org so i added the nodes back and centered them on the yards additional to the areas. I started a discussion with openrailmap. the issue seems to be just with the .org map not the .app map.
nickvet419 (2026-05-18 22:22:42+00:00): also some yards never had nodes so i also created those with the temp fix.
NeisBot (2026-04-09 21:30:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13681875360 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Furniture store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-17 22:33:41+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181478920
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
NeisBot (2026-04-09 21:33:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13682162042 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Barber shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-17 22:33:45+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181478924
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
NeisBot (2026-04-09 21:39:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13682964296 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Karate school"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-17 22:33:50+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181478925
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
rarad74 (2026-04-10 05:32:00+00:00): Hi. This kind of streets are living streets, not unclassified. Clearly. It goes to some private houses. And is very clear that surface is unpaved/ground. On these streets you can put acces tag as " to reach a destination".
dvillas (2026-04-10 19:02:28+00:00): Hello rarad74,

I agree this road shouldn’t be tagged as unclassified; however, residential seems more appropriate here than living_street. I wanted to ask how you distinguish between residential and living_street, as I’ve noticed these tags are used somewhat inconsistently throughout the town. According to the OSM Wiki, living_street typically implies specific legal conditions (e.g., pedestrian priority, low speed limits, special parking and traffic rules), which aren’t verifiable here, so I’m hesitant to apply that tag.

If you could share how you determine when to use residential vs. living_street in this area, that would be helpful for keeping future edits consistent. thanks!
Everteal (2026-04-09 21:44:44+00:00): Les POI au saint du centre ont tous été passés en disused, avec les clés suivantes associées :

end_date:note=fermé pour travaux jusqu'en 2030
end_date:source=https://www.centrepompidou.fr/en/the-centre-pompidou-is-transforming-itself
end_date=2025-03-02
opening_date=2030-01-01

Je laisse le centre en amenity=arts_center pour éviter qu'il disparaisse complètement des applications (ce n'est qu'une rénovation, supposément), et qu'un contributeur vienne le rajouter par erreur.

La géométrie de la zone de construction est encore en construction, il reste à ajouter les barrières autour.
NeisBot (2026-04-09 21:42:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13682056613 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Uptown Blanco Restaurant"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-17 22:33:53+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181478929
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
iandees (2026-04-09 21:52:47+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1649586673 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181118857, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
NeisBot (2026-04-09 21:51:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13682217090 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Gift shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-17 22:33:56+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181478932
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
Tomas09 (2026-04-10 16:10:13+00:00): What for has help been requested?
Tomas09 (2026-04-09 21:55:00+00:00): Op de Loosstraat en van Voorststraat :P
NeisBot (2026-04-09 21:54:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13682463408 v4

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Restaurant Hoosier Proper"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-17 22:33:58+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181478933
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
infeeeee (2026-04-10 11:12:58+00:00): Szia!

Ezt nem így kell jelölni, hanem a peron címkéi közé fel lehet venni a gyalogutat is. Javítottam itt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181140052

További jó térképezést!
Andras Pal (2026-04-10 14:49:42+00:00): Koszi szepen! :) 

Nekem is remlett hogy mas peronokat mintha beletervezett volna az utvonaltervezo, de hirtelen nem talaltam... de igy akkor jobb!
Glassman (2026-04-11 16:21:11+00:00): It looks like you dragged Stottlemeyer Road at an interesection. 

Also, we typically don't add addresses to sheds.

I updated both
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181119173
iandees (2026-04-09 23:13:07+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1341738542 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181120541, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
vadder-h-j (2026-04-09 23:25:02+00:00): Danke
NeisBot (2026-04-09 22:30:22+00:00): Hi googleuser3212, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 81% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 3 addr(s)
- 1 amenity(s)
- 3 building(s)
- 3 highway(s)
- 1 landuse(s)
- 1 name(s)
- 3 surface(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=181119638
gormur (2026-04-10 14:50:40+00:00): Please have more descriptive changeset comments. In this changeset, a way is added. Nothing was updated as the description says?
rarad74 (2026-04-10 04:49:14+00:00): You must add accest tag for service roads that goes into a private area. There is not enough only to draw lines. A child can do this....
lampronessa (2026-04-10 19:52:04+00:00): Hello rarad74, 

It’s unclear from the imagery whether a gate is present, so I didn’t add a private access tag, but I’m happy to defer to your local knowledge here.