piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
OSM-SAMOA (2025-07-30 23:59:24+00:00): Happy to add to the knowledge pool. All roads labelled as Public Roads are surveyed public roads, as identified in the cadastral layer, regardless of whether they have been cleared for development. Roads traversing customary land that have been paved or sealed, but are not surveyed, have been provisionally classified as Minor Unclassified Roads until a formal road name is acquired. These are generally referred to as Customary Land Access Roads and lack defined legal boundaries. Relevant naming and boundary details remain under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Lands and Survey and the Lands / Land and Titles Court. The secondary cross island road at malololelei has been defaulted to under construction because sections dont exist.
Bienson (2025-07-26 04:41:05+00:00): Hallo,

Ist https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1334631243 als Gehweg ausgeschildert? Ansonsten ist dieser Weg definitiv breit genug für zweispurige Fahrzeuge (Krankenwagen etc.) und sollte wohl besser als highway=service mit entsprechenden access-Tags eingetragen sein.

Außerdem hatte ich die östliche Wohngebietsgrenze exakt nach Liegenschaftskataster eingetragen. die hast du nun wieder leicht verschoben.
tobiasff3200 (2025-07-26 13:59:43+00:00): Ist wieder korrigiert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169508511
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2025-08-17 21:54:39+00:00): Hi, living street should be marked by a corresponding traffic sign. By your description I'm not sure if the decision was made based on this information.
tastrax (2025-07-29 06:24:37+00:00): Thanks for your edits - Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, +61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features#Phone_Numbers .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
Comino (2025-07-25 06:47:57+00:00): Hi Armazem Terra Mineira,

In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes".

Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag !
Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead.

For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Merchants#legacy-tags
and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bitcoin

Happy mapping,

Edwin
bernward1 (2025-07-25 15:52:26+00:00): Das networkmapping war nicht falsch. Sowohl die Kurzform als auch die Langform sind zulässig.
Bis vor 6 Monaten war die Kurzform üblich.
TangledRockets (2025-07-27 21:53:28+00:00): Hallo Bernward

Ich habe letzte Monat zu diesem Thema ein Changeset von dir kommentiert, du hast aber nicht geantwortet.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167994805

Sowohl kurz- und Langform der network=* sind zwar richtig, aber wenn man beide Formen angeben will, ist network='langform' und network:short='kurzform' die akzeptierte und weitverwendete Struktur. Ein neue Tag ("network:long") zu erfinden und breitermaßen ohne Diskussion einzusetzen ist nicht den richtigen Weg.

Wenn du diese Form unangemessen findest, solltest du im Forum solches besprechen, bzw. ein Proposal zur Änderungen formulieren. Sonst werden deine Änderungen von mir und vielen anderen ständig korrigiert.

Schönen Abend noch,
TR
bernward1 (2025-07-28 12:34:15+00:00): Wir sollten die wirklichen Fehler in den Buslinien beseitigen. Wenn man in PTNA nachsieht gibt es im VRM genug zu tun.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-07-25 10:59:44+00:00): Hi! Please use bicycle=dismount instead of bicycle=no, except if there is a specific sign saying you cannot even bring the bicycle while dismounted (almost never happen in Quebec, except inside some buildings)
saintam1 (2025-07-25 12:05:46+00:00): Hi, Happy to comply with local custom but I must point out that's not the meaning of bicycle=dismount according to the wiki. But if that's what the rest of the map uses here, I'll stick to that from now on, thanks.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-07-25 13:20:18+00:00): Can you point out the wiki part you mention? I do not seem to find it. bicycle=dismount seems legit here.

In Quebec, bicycle access is prohibited by law on all sidewalks, except when permitted with a specific sign. Thus, by default, it should be dismount. Park footpaths are ambiguous, but we usually tag them bicycle=dismount except when part of a cycleway network or when bicycle pictograms can be found. Some routing engines now block access to bicycle when bicycle=no even at walking speed (dismounted), so it is  safer to not cut access to parks to bicycle routing engines and keep the bicycle=dismount value.
Thanks and have a nice day!
Glassman (2025-07-25 23:36:54+00:00): Do you know if OSM is allowed to use Ferndale's imagery? I'm in Skagit county and know that the imagery can not be used in OSM.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169427509
nevw (2025-07-25 04:34:50+00:00): Hi, I noticed you added your business tags to this large building. Are you the only tenant or owner? If there are multiple businesses here you should instead add a new node within the building outline and add your business tags to that.
Also addr:street=Eastside Building seems like it should be addr:street=Waterfront Place.
the name of the building could be added to the building outline with name=Eastside Building
akadouri (2026-01-04 00:15:44+00:00): Hello, please note that the name of this parking garage is actually "MPG" (short for Manhattan Parking Garage) and is not a ref code.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3134691332
Hypsometric (2026-01-05 11:28:15+00:00): Thanks for the catch. I see you made an edit already. Since it is short for "Manhattan Parking Group", I will add a brand tag for context. That should avoid confusion in the future.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-07-25 04:09:43+00:00): Hello!

What is the source and license of imagery you use to map?

How do you know that this unusual aerial imagery can be used? 

It looks very much like proxied Google Maps imagery. Which would be a big problem.
fortera_au (2025-08-01 23:46:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 169841222, 169841249, 169841240, 169841260, 169841200, 169841256, 169841237, 169841215, 169841214, 169841228, 169841245, 169841232 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: incompatible source
WWMapper101 (2025-07-29 14:57:14+00:00): You seem to have confused addr:country for addr:postcode on 2647. I've fixed it, just wanted to comment to prevent it from happening again
Fen <3 (2025-07-29 19:58:20+00:00): Thanks for fixing it! I must have been tired or something and put it in the wrong field in the address preset in JOSM. Have a good day!
impiaaa (2025-07-25 18:25:35+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap! As general advice, if you're not sure how to do something, you can always ask in one of the many OSM communities https://openstreetmap.community/ , or leave a note using the 💬 button on the right-side of the web map.
impiaaa (2025-07-25 18:23:18+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap! OSM is a map of every thing on the world. Please be careful when editing other objects—https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/38216383 was an industrial area, not a single camera, and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/826812901 was a house. It also helps to leave descriptive changeset comments, describing what you changed and why; for example, "Added ALPR cameras by referencing street-level imagery." More examples here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
fortera_au (2025-08-01 23:47:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 169841222, 169841249, 169841240, 169841260, 169841200, 169841256, 169841237, 169841215, 169841214, 169841228, 169841245, 169841232 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: incompatible source
felipeeugenio (2025-07-25 14:04:48+00:00): Hola. Qué es "departamento central"?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169429640
superior-june-ship (2025-08-31 15:24:54+00:00): Confused as why my speed changes were reset. CSX is operating at 40mph now through the area on the mainline https://www.winthropmaine.gov/trainspeeds
RailandSea (2025-08-31 15:43:28+00:00): One of the sections speeds was set in KMH not MPH. Based on the current bulletin order at the time of update speeds were only updated at the MP Limits as defined.
superior-june-ship (2025-08-31 16:09:06+00:00): My blunder then. Either way I do believe CSX is operating at 40mph through here, but I can't find anything from them directly, only from the towns they notified.
RailandSea (2025-08-31 16:30:59+00:00): It not a big deal, they just are delayed on updating things when it comes to train ops. Give it time they will have the whole subdivision updated to 40-60MPH in due time.
Sébastien Pi (2025-09-11 21:47:24+00:00): Bonjour,

Y a aucun pont ici et encore moins en niveau 1. La voie est « au sol ». Il y eu un renforcement de fait en début d’année (environ). La route est le reste, c’est du tunnel. On peut mettre un mur de soutènement, mais rien de plus.
Sébastien Pi (2025-09-11 21:48:47+00:00): D’ailleurs, je vois que vous l’avez ajouté : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1415898376
Sébastien Pi (2025-09-11 22:15:46+00:00): Je viens de changer le niveau (0, car c’est au niveau du sol).

Pour mettre de l’eau au moulin : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tunnel
> For some grade separated crossings it may however be debatable if the lower way is in the tunnel or if the upper way is on a bridge=*. In general, if the lower way is long and surrounded by earth it is almost certainly a tunnel; and if the lower way is short and the upper way is supported on concrete, brick on metal pillars and beams then that is almost certainly a bridge. There are however situations where it is a matter of personal judgement, but it is preferred to either tag the lower way as tunnel or the upper way as a bridge, but not both. 

C’est la dernière partie qui m’interesse. On ne devrait pas mettre les deux. La LINO est clairement un tunnel. La ligne ferrovière, même s’ils ont renforcé en ajoutant une structure, n’est pas vraiment sur un pont mais plutôt le « plafond » du tunnel.
Qu’en pensez-vous ?
salma_ayman (2025-07-27 11:22:08+00:00): Hello Abdullah Al Werfalli,
Thank you for your contribution to OpenStreetMap.
I noticed that you changed the classification to "highway=trunk" in those ways:
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1339462879
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/171541135
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/171541130
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/171541143
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/646459180
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1413586110
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/171539012
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1413836107
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/646459182
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1413586111
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/646459183
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/171538954
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/171539055
And I think it's not suitable according to the policies. For more information about link classifications, in the Wiki OpenStreetMap:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtrunk_link
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dprimary_link
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dsecondary_link
If you have different information, please share that with us. If not
Could you please fix this issue?
Regards,
salma_ayman
salma_ayman (2025-07-27 13:24:21+00:00): Hello Abdullah Al Werfalli,
Thank you for your contribution to OpenStreetMap.
I noticed that you changed the classification to "highway=trunk" in this roundabout:
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/176594456
And I think it's not suitable according to the policies. For more information about roundabout classifications, in the Wiki OpenStreetMap:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction=roundabout
If you have different information, please share that with us. If not
Could you please fix this issue?
Regards,
salma_ayman
fortera_au (2025-08-01 23:47:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 169841222, 169841249, 169841240, 169841260, 169841200, 169841256, 169841237, 169841215, 169841214, 169841228, 169841245, 169841232 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: incompatible source
marczoutendijk_repair (2025-08-04 18:50:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 169971828, 169971827 where the changeset comment is: ¨DWG
Filip009 (2025-07-28 08:01:03+00:00): Zdravím, používajte lepšie názvy sád zmien. Ako napríklad: "pridal som smerovník", "pridal som bicycle=yes na smerovník", "upravil som cyklotrasu", "odstránil som neexistujúci smerovník". https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Dobr%C3%A9_koment%C3%A1%C5%99e_sad_zm%C4%9Bn
MassCartog (2025-07-25 19:18:40+00:00): Hey, I see you removed a bunch of surveillance ALPR that you had also just added, but you gave no reason why you removed them. Could you let us know your source for the original add, and also why you removed? Someone might see this without checking who added them in the 1st place and wonder why you are deleting surveillance devices.
Brendan_07 (2025-07-28 04:25:17+00:00): I'm also curious about these recent edits.
Sanniu (2025-07-27 11:25:25+00:00): Hi, is it a roundabout?
moshikosh (2025-07-27 11:36:54+00:00): it looks like a roundabout, but i do not know. there  traffic there and it is possible to do u-turns there. you can look at the image
Sanniu (2025-07-27 11:42:36+00:00): Look like full roundabout, will update
Fizzie-DWG (2025-10-11 23:35:47+00:00): DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122
fortera_au (2025-07-26 03:31:54+00:00): If it is a waterway, it might be better to revert/remap this but tag it correctly.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169433743
GOwin (2025-07-26 03:55:38+00:00): So ironic for them to get *roasted*. ;)

Thanks for the update!
felipeeugenio (2025-07-25 13:08:19+00:00): Hola. Un detalle.
Los caminos de servicio son private/customers/etc... solo hasta el barrier=.

De ahí hacia "afuera" no tienen access=.

El barrier=también lleva access=. el mismo del camino.

Yo los corrijo.

Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169434080
NeisBot (2025-07-25 06:43:35+00:00): Hi Jooneski, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 99% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 20 natural(s)
- 49 landuse(')

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=169434862
osmviborg (2025-07-25 10:31:13+00:00): Please don't tag buildings with addresses. In DK addresses are kept on nodes only.
GeoffreyBresth (2025-07-25 11:05:17+00:00): So how do I get the numbering corrected?
osmviborg (2025-07-25 11:14:22+00:00): You must contact Kalundborg municipality, and request that they correct the error.
Mingwei (2025-08-10 00:21:25+00:00): Nice
NeisBot (2025-07-25 06:54:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-07-28 06:58:42+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/169594455
PierreDuMatin (2025-08-10 23:46:20+00:00): Bonjour,
Nous étions d'accord il y a trois mois que le SIRET 91801601500011 est incorrect pour ce commerce. Il correspond à un ancien établissement situé à Éguilles et fermé depuis.

Pourquoi le réinstaurer ?
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2025-08-11 06:40:56+00:00): Bonjour,

Merci pour l'alerte.
Désolé pour la mauvaise information mais notre client nous l'a envoyé par erreur.
Nous l'avons corrigé à ce jour

Cordialement,
L'Equipe DB
PierreDuMatin (2025-08-11 23:29:49+00:00): Merci pour la prompte correction.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-10-21 23:58:31+00:00): DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173604794
NorthCrab_upload (2025-07-25 07:30:52+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/680209517

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
kaleidoscopica (2025-07-25 20:56:20+00:00): I don't think this is true grassland - there is very little real grassland left in Texas (less than 1% of what we once had). Most of this is scrub.
rempshaener (2025-07-25 17:41:08+00:00): Hallo,
das sieht insgesamt sehr gut aus.
Nur eine Anmerkung zum nicht ganz einfachen Wasserbehälter.
Das Wiki ist an dieser Stelle leider nicht sehr deutlich. Es wird bei Wasserentnahmestellen grob unterschieden zwischen „Wasserentnahme per Druck- oder Saugschlauch an fester Armatur“ und „Wasserentnahme per Saugleitung“. Die erste Fallgruppe ist immer ein emergency=fire_hydrant, die zweite ist emergency=suction_point, emergency=water_tank usw.
In diesem Fall hier spricht mehr für emergency=fire_hydrant.
Viele Grüße
custodiankeyy (2025-07-25 21:45:41+00:00): Please write the full version instead of abbreviations

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169477649
mga_geo (2025-07-30 12:27:45+00:00): Bonjour,
Vous avez cassé la continuité du tracé de la relation route=bus r18231059.
Pouvez-vous corriger ?
Marc
TomatoCat (2025-07-25 07:58:38+00:00): i messed up the source tags it is supposed to be Aerial Imagery;streetlevel imagery;streetside;https://www.frrpd.com/playtown-usa
Thanks
TomatoCat (2025-07-25 07:59:19+00:00): i messed up the source tags it is supposed to be Aerial Imagery;streetlevel imagery;streetside;https://www.frrpd.com/playtown-usa;https://www.frrpd.com/gary-nolan-baseball-complex
Thanks
Piz Pachific (2025-07-25 08:56:59+00:00): Hallo
Du hast mit diesem Changeset die Albulastrasse kaputt gemacht. Einerseits fehlte ein Stück Strasse und andererseits hast du Punkte in der Kurve gelöscht, so dass sie nicht mehr schön rund war. Habe es im Changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169440737 korrigiert. Das nächste Mal bitte vorsichtiger bearbeiten, Danke.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-07-25 08:31:21+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13022462507
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/260478865

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2025-07-25 08:31:22+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13022464201
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/260478846

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2025-07-25 08:40:55+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11303561635
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1417162266

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
cyclist789 (2026-03-26 15:58:32+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12726591026
From this node, water flows downwards both to the north and to the south. I don't think that this is a real waterway, but rather just a shallow cutting in the ground made to (imprecisely) mark where Harrested Skov and Storevænge meet.

https://kortoverblik.dk/spatialmap
Placing waterways is surprisingly difficult. I have taken to using the above site for height maps and other data, and even then I sometimes have a hard time telling which way the water flows.

My experiences with kortoverblik.dk, in case they could prove useful:
- You can order the various themes, to control which are displayed above which.
- "Danmarks Højdekort -> 0,5 m højdekurver" are very useful.
- "GeoDanmark Baggrundskort -> Sagsbehandlingskort -> Hydro + Supplement" are merely good suggestions. They can not be relied on, and often blatantly defy gravity.
- "Danske Stednavne" shows the full length of various named waterways, including other things.

(I might copy these points to my Dashboard at some point)
Niels GM (2026-04-29 06:40:44+00:00): Point taken, but the Danish word 'grøft' does not in my view imply a waterway with a strong direction of water current, just an elongated  depression in the ground which is often wet or filled with water. I think it is used ok here, both 'grøft' and 'ditch' have the approximately the same meaning.
cyclist789 (2026-04-29 09:11:35+00:00): Right, but the *names* of the various tags and features can not really be relied on. The meaning of the various tags sorta have to be looked up on the wiki, e.g. waterway=drain.
Most waterway=* tags represent waters moving in a specific direction.

Other tags are even more obtuse. The man_made=embankment does not represent an embankment, but rather the *edge of the top* of an embankment, drawn with the lower side on the right. (See also natural=cliff and barrier=retaining_wall.)

I must admit that I don't know the correct way to tag these undirected ditches.
For now, how about I change the dry, undirected segments to barrier=ditch? It's not perfect, but at least it doesn't have an implied direction, and it is still visible on OSM Carto.
osmviborg (2026-04-29 10:59:20+00:00): embankment=yes
cyclist789 (2026-04-30 13:59:45+00:00): That tag is intended to be added to highways and the like, but in this case, the Way is neither a highway nor a waterway (technically).

There is *usually* a small embankment/berm on one side of these "boundary ditches", but not always, so I don't think that it is the correct solution.

(But now that I think about it, I have seen places where waterway=ditch embankment=yes would be the right combination for a Way.)💡
josmougn (2025-07-26 10:08:35+00:00): Pourquoi avoir supprimé ce noeud https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13015316539 ?
ivanbranco (2025-07-25 09:10:29+00:00): Hi sovereign_quocda,

did you read this comment?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169428545

You have uploaded three new changesets after Mateusz's comment. It would be better to answer his question before continuing to map.

thanks
fortera_au (2025-08-01 23:47:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 169841222, 169841249, 169841240, 169841260, 169841200, 169841256, 169841237, 169841215, 169841214, 169841228, 169841245, 169841232 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: incompatible source