piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2025-05-23 11:55:33+00:00): Hi nmst09, and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: Added farmland area to improve land use mapping.
PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment #AIgenerated #Gibberish
eerib (2025-05-22 18:51:51+00:00): Hello,

This changeset has been reverted. Please refer to:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F

If you would like to have the decision reviewed you can create a discussion topic on the OpenStreetMap Community Forum.

https://community.openstreetmap.org/

You can also email the Data Working Group to have the decision reviewed.

data@openstreetmap.org

Thank you
berndw (2025-12-31 08:47:14+00:00): Hallo

kurze Frage.

Ist die Straße immer noch gesperrt?

Der Grund, die Baustelle auf der B255, scheint nicht mehr gegeben.

Wenn frei bitte access=no entfernen
Stephan Weber (2025-12-31 11:20:34+00:00): Das müsste vielleicht jemand vor Ort beantworten. Ich war im Mai dort auf Radtour unterwegs.
berndw (2025-12-31 12:14:56+00:00): Ok, danke, dann mache ich auf Verdacht wieder frei.

Kann mir das zeitnah ansehen.
❤️‍🔥 (2025-05-28 15:03:32+00:00): Hi, the way it was previously is the correct method of mapping roundabouts. If there is a physical barrier between both side of the road, then they should be mapped as two seperate oneway lines. there's some more info here: https://osm.wiki/Dual_carriageway
akljaxin (2025-05-28 21:30:45+00:00): This is helpful thank you! I was looking at the layout from Park Green Avenue and Parkmore Drive which is a similar roundabout and drawn without the oneway lines. love your thoughts on that roundabout.
❤️‍🔥 (2025-05-29 05:35:28+00:00): yeah that roundabout is also using the unideal method , because it was presumably drawn before the new aerial imagery was published. so eventually someone will come past here and refine it
Pikse (2025-09-22 11:08:50+00:00): This road is adjacent to Kolde puiestee but is not part of it, see https://xgis.maaamet.ee/adsavalik/LP00019470

As per official address data this road has no name.

The same about e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/70703115 adjacent to Sõle tänav
MassCartog (2025-05-23 00:09:16+00:00): Hi welcome to OSM. In many of the change sets you have been making it you are removing features that appear to exist on the ground in vary recent aerial imagery. Could you explain why these features have been removed? 

Also note that the description box on a OSM changeset is to let others know the reason you are making changes and where you are getting your information, your experience great, but its that's helpful for others trying to understand why you are mass deleting was seem to be valid trails. 

OSM is a community effort, please explain your self and your source before you continue to removed data.
MassCartog (2025-05-23 00:19:13+00:00): Sorry too many type-o's, let me try again:

Hi, welcome to OSM. In many of the changesets you have been making, you are removing features that appear to exist on the ground in very recent aerial imagery. Could you explain why these features have been removed?

Also note that the description box on OSM changeset is to let others know the reason you are making changes and where you are getting your information. Your experience is great, but it's not helpful for others trying to understand why you are mass deleting what seem to be valid trails.

OSM is a community effort, please explain yourself and your source before you continue to remove data.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-02 10:25:56+00:00): Hello!

You used
surface=gravel=
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/21474224/history

Have you maybe meant
surface=gravel
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
KFCmenomonie (2025-12-14 17:03:09+00:00): That was a typo, thank you!
VladKac (2025-06-10 06:46:13+00:00): Čajný potok.
kingkingHK (2025-07-27 05:34:52+00:00): Is `contact:name=` supposed to be `contract:name=`? Typo?
Kovoschiz (2025-07-27 09:50:27+00:00): Corrected (as seen from others)
chnuessli (2025-05-27 06:20:58+00:00): Ich habe beim Betreiber nachgefragt und die Angaben auf dem Defi vervollständigt.
CurlingMan13 (2025-05-30 05:12:27+00:00): Changeset reverted.  We use access tags to denote if it is private.  You can read why deletion is not the answer here:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166952052
handini (2025-06-18 17:04:15+00:00): my apologies
nevw (2025-05-23 00:19:38+00:00): Hi, you have located the business building on the footway in front of an industrial complex. You need to shift it to the actual physical building it occupies.
AndreaDp271 (2025-05-22 20:00:06+00:00): non mi è chiaro cos'hai editato
ivanbranco (2025-05-22 20:06:57+00:00): Ciao Andrea, cosa stai utilizzando per visualizzare le modifiche?

Ha cambiato sport a un campo da basket, specificato il tipo di parcheggi e l'orientamento delle macchine, aggiunto degli attraversamenti, la direzione a delle precedenze e aggiunto dei tag brand.

Conosci better-osm-org? Potrebbe aiutarti a comprendere il contenuto dei changeset altrui
nick1993 (2025-05-22 20:38:08+00:00): Confermo quanto detto da ivan, visto che non hai risposto al mio invito di la', ho provato ad andare a stime e iniziato a togliere i tag brand, poi ho notato il resto, e mi sono messo piano piano a sistemare, ma se e' il paese giusto, e' solo l'inizio dai
AndreaDp271 (2025-05-22 21:29:52+00:00): io utilizzo openstreetmap base, d'altronde si dovrebbe vedere tutto, no? nick, a quale invito ti riferisci?
ivanbranco (2025-05-23 05:28:15+00:00): @Andrea su Telegram aveva scritto "Ps @AndreaDp271 qual è il tuo piccolo paesino che stasera vedo di darti na mano"

Su OpenStreetMap base è davvero difficile capire le modifiche di un changeset, ci sono siti dedicati (tipo Osmcha) che puoi utilizzare con le stesse coordinate. Volendo puoi anche creare un feed RSS con Osmcha che ti notifica su Telegram ogni volta che viene fatta una modifica nella tua zona.
ivanbranco (2025-05-23 05:28:47+00:00): che puoi utilizzare con le stesse credenziali*
AndreaDp271 (2025-05-23 07:16:40+00:00): eh, non ci ho fatto caso al msg, tra i tanti.

Non capivo la descrizione del gruppo modifiche, (cosa intendevi con precedenze).
Comunque interessante sta cosa do Osmcha, approfondirò
NorthCrab_upload (2025-05-22 19:41:32+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, zamień addr:place na addr:city. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/853735656

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
mueschel (2025-05-24 16:33:34+00:00): Please don't try to start discussions in 'description' tags. 
I removed "maxweight:7.5" because such a tag doesn't exist. There can't be a value inside the key. 
The correct form for conditionally different weight restrictions is maxweight:conditional = * @ *
JezCrow (2025-05-23 22:33:51+00:00): If you want to map what was there before, please use OpenHistoricalMap. Also we are not allowed to use Google Earth for mapping for copyright reasons.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166676457
HellMap (2025-05-23 11:35:15+00:00): Hello,

Why did you delete this clearcut https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18704374 / https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1359826336 ?

Also, as already mentioned, please stop tagging and changing isolated dwellings and residential areas to farmyards when they clearly are not. For example, how is this a farmyard https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1388857650 a  ?
Tramparam Parampampam (2025-05-26 14:57:43+00:00): clearcuts are shows in the map as white squares, i don't think is important to keep em.

farmyards shows nice in the map, isolated dwellings are white. 

i'm making map better, not making data better.

anyway, if you against this, i'll stop editing for a while. cya.
HellMap (2025-05-26 15:48:13+00:00): Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer .

OSM data has to be correct. You cannot delete or change something because you personally don't like it. OSM is a community-driven project, which means everyone is expected to follow consistent editing practices and standards. It is okay to make mistakes, but it is definitely not okay to do so deliberately, especially deleting correct data added by others. You can discuss and propose different approaches, but you are still expected to follow community norms even if you don't personally agree with them. It doesn't make the rendered map better to selectively show incorrect features that do not match the expected map legend.

OSM is not just a map. The default rendered map is only one of many uses of OSM from routing to data analysis to quality assurance to humanitarian efforts, etc. There are also hundreds of maps and applications that render these same elements differently. Here is just a partial list of services that use OSM https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/List_of_OSM-based_services . The default map doesn't render a lot of elements and their properties, but that is not a reason to mistag or delete them.

See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Verifiability and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ground_truth that discuss more about element correctness.
richlv (2025-06-05 20:53:33+00:00): And to add to the great explanation HellMap posted, you are very welcome to discuss these topics in the Latvian OSM community chat at https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com .
NorthCrab_upload (2025-05-22 20:21:24+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12856305882
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12856305881
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12856305880
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12856305875
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12856305869
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12856305868
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12856305867
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12856305866
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12856305865
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12856305864
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12856305863
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12856305862
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12856305861
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12856305860
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12856305859
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/449111723
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/449111727
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/449111730
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/449111729
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/449111734
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/449111743
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/449111744
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/449111745
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/449111746
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/449111748
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/449111747
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/449111750
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/449111751
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/449111753
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/449111754
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/449111738

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
meeck (2025-05-23 09:06:12+00:00): Czemu skróciłeś Gwiaździstą ? Ona w rzeczywistości wchodzi do połowy tej wąskiej działki, oznaczonej nieprawidłowo "scrub".
A67-A67 (2025-05-23 10:58:55+00:00): Graag geen gaten slaan in secundaire wegen of losse eindjes creëren. Het gaat bij primary t/m unclassified om de locatie binnen het wegennet. De wegbeheerder kan worden toegevoegd in de tag operator. De wegbeheerder is slechts een indicatie van het belang van de weg.

Ik heb deze wijziging teruggedraaid.
A67-A67 (2025-05-23 10:56:55+00:00): Graag geen gaten slaan in secundaire wegen of losse eindjes creëren. Het gaat bij primary t/m unclassified om de locatie binnen het wegennet. De wegbeheerder kan worden toegevoegd in de tag operator.
A67-A67 (2025-05-23 10:58:35+00:00): Ik heb deze wijziging teruggedraaid.
vakantieland dot nl (2025-05-23 11:01:14+00:00): Heb je geen tool om die hele sectie van Veghel t/m Gemert in één keer om te zetten van secondary naar tertiary? Het is immers geen N-weg meer.
A67-A67 (2025-05-23 11:08:35+00:00): Dat zou een incorrecte wijziging zijn.

Of een weg een N-weg is bepaald niet of een weg tertiair of secundair is. Het gaat om de hierachische plaats in het wegennet. Daarin is deze weg van hoger belang dat de tertiaire wegen in hetzelfde gebied.
vakantieland dot nl (2025-05-23 11:14:48+00:00): Bedankt voor de uitleg.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-05-22 20:32:01+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12856304727
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/890174904

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
BCNorwich (2025-05-25 05:03:16+00:00): Hi. Please don't tag footpaths as layer=-1 when the path is at/on ground level. I've removed several layer=-1 tags, I've added several sections of layer=-1, tunnel=yes where the footpath goes under/through buildings.

Regards Bernard.
todeveni (2025-05-29 13:50:36+00:00): Kaupungin tonttia, ei yksityisaluetta.

Ymmärtänet varmaan pointin changesettien kommenteistani.

Toivoisin, että käyt läpi muutkin bicycle=no ja bicycle=private muutoksesi, koska näistä todella moni on tehty sellaisiin paikkoihin, missä pyöräilyä ei ole mitenkään erikseen kielletty. Se, että pyöräily ei välttämättä onnistu, ei ole kivaa tai ei ole suotavaa, ei tarkoita sitä, että pyöräily on kielletty. Esim. Toppilansaaren aallonmurtaja. Kivikko on talvella lumen ja/tai jään alla ja aivan hyvin saa ajettua metrit Wandreriin.

Mutta näin muuten loistavaa polkukartoitusta, kiitos siitä 😊
NorthCrab_upload (2025-05-22 21:01:57+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12856377500
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1014059942

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
user_22937564 (2025-05-26 10:25:01+00:00): rozwiązane
NeisReview (2025-05-23 05:27:00+00:00): Do these edits come from the same user, or is the overlap purely coincidental?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/RupertJames/history

Regardless, I have submitted reports on both to the Data Working Group (DWG).
RedCedar1 (2025-05-23 14:50:56+00:00): Not sure who that is so it must be coincidental. I work in the San Rafael remediating motorized intrusions in the wilderness and part of this process is removing them from the maps so they don't show up on Gaia and other sources to be violated again. 

I appreciate your concern. I am simply removing unlawful routes to protect the wilderness and to protect the visitor experience.
citrula (2025-05-23 00:09:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contribution!
galen8183 (2025-05-23 19:41:25+00:00): Hi! It looks like you accidentally tagged this as `highway=junction=roundabout`, I've corrected this in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166671349
NorthCrab_upload (2025-05-22 21:40:58+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12856447225
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/298135379
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/897004625
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/897004645
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/897004657
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/897004670
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/897004692
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/897004717
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/897004729
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/897004750
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/897004799
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/897004867
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/897004947
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/897005052
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/897005060
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/897005098
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/897005132
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/897005162
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/897005166
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/897005186
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/897005285
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/897005287
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/897005336
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/897005343
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/897005349
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/897005481
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/897005541
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/946087781
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/946087843
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/946087858
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/946087912
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/946087915
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/946087999
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/946088102
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/946088315
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/946088360
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/946088386
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/946088468
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/946088494
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/946088545
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/946088690
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/946088716
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/946088717
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/946088876
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/946089220
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/946089478
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1214965636
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1388878780
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1388878792
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1388878798
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1388878805

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
YomanNH (2025-06-02 07:03:23+00:00): Czy przed kontynuowaniem modyfikowania adresów mógłbyś nauczyć się, jak się je prawidłowo taguje? Ciągle dostajesz komentarze, że popełniasz błędy i to ignorujesz.

W tym zestawie zmian pousuwałeś prawidłowe punkty adresowe zmapowane jako node i przeniosłeś adresy na budynki mapując według swojej błędnej wizji tworzenia adresów.

Popraw błędy, którą były jasno wskazywane w twoich zestawach zmian, zanim będziesz kontynuował mapowanie.
Barroszt (2025-08-03 10:04:44+00:00): Już się biorę za poprawę błędów, dziękuje za komentarz, już miesiąc temu nauczyłem się jak prawidłowo tagować, sporo już poprawiłem, ale jednak nie wszystko
YomanNH (2025-08-03 18:30:37+00:00): Nie wydaje mi się, że nauczyłeś się poprawnie tagować adresy, patrząc na to, że pod większością nowych zestawów zmian masz wiadomości o błędach...
Barroszt (2025-08-04 10:21:19+00:00): ale błędy szybko zmieniam w niebłędy, czyli naprawiam, czasami po prostu coś mi się wymsknie
Barroszt (2025-08-04 16:42:24+00:00): zrobiona prawie całość
nativenic (2026-03-25 11:00:39+00:00): https://nativenic.com/native-cigarettes-sudbury/
A67-A67 (2025-05-23 10:49:19+00:00): Hoi, 
Je geeft aan dat er wel een drempel / verhoogde kruising is. Dan was de tag traffic_calming=table dus correct. De effectiviteit van de drempel is niet relevant.

Overigens zijn drempels bedoeld om verkeer dat te hard rijdt af te remmen, niet verkeer dat zich al aan de snelheid houdt.
santamariense (2025-06-04 12:00:09+00:00): Salviomar Rocha,

Por que é troncal? É a melhor rota entre cidades com mais de 200 mil habitantes? Se sim, quais?
lololailo (2025-05-23 13:09:31+00:00): Hola arte2002, la descripción la añadí yo porque pienso que es interesante esa información y no conozco una manera mejor que esa para  saber que es un camino público incluido en un catálogo. Un saludo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166630985
arte2002 (2025-05-23 22:30:26+00:00): Hola lololailo,

La descripción es para dar información relevante de un objeto, al usuario final.

Si lo que quieres es informar a otros editores puedes utilizar 'note=*'

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:description?uselang=es
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:note

Si los caminos tienen referencia he visto esto
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:loc_ref
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:prow_ref

Saludos
lololailo (2025-05-26 08:03:55+00:00): Hola, pienso que es una información relevante advertir de que se trata de un camino incluido en un catálogo de caminos públicos y no encuentro la manera de hacerlo con las etiquetas.
NeisBot (2025-05-22 21:55:35+00:00): Hi RupertJames, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 99% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 3 highway(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=166631199
RupertJames (2025-05-22 21:59:02+00:00): Changes were done intentional and with significant knowledge.
pmckay419 (2025-06-04 22:49:18+00:00): I have reverted parts of this changeset. You deleted part of the Black Jump trail leaving it disconnected from other routes. I visited that area last week and verified the trail is still present on the ground. Please do not delete any features you do not directly know don't exist on the ground.
archie (2025-05-24 15:52:44+00:00): Hej, nu är det så att ICA (versaler)  är ett registrerat varumärke för ett privat företag/koncern. På vilket sätt har "Myndigheternas skrivregler" betydelse för detta privata företags firma (med firma avses företagets namn)? Registerhållare för varumärken är förresten Patent- och Registreringsverket (en statlig myndighet), som envist och i alla möjliga sammanhang  brukar använda sitt namn i förkortat form med PRV (sålunda ej Prv).
Söderman (2025-06-14 23:39:25+00:00): Jag ber om ursäkt för att jag missade Ditt meddelande förrän nu. Namnet till trots innehåller ”Myndigheternas skrivregler” regler som bör förstås som allmängiltiga för det svenska språket. Jag vill i synnerhet uppmärksamma avsnitt 11.8.2, ”Initialförkortningar som är namn”:
”Initialförkortningar av namn skrivs med stora bokstäver när förkortningen uttalas bokstav för bokstav.
[…]
När namnförkortningar utläses som ord (inte bokstav för bokstav), skrivs de med endast stor begynnelsebokstav”.
”Prv” vore således ett felaktigt skrivsätt, eftersom namnet uttalas bokstav för bokstav. Skrivsättet ”ICA” antyder i stället uttalet ”i‐se‐a”.

Det går även att vända på resonemanget: varför skulle det vara mer relevant för en ideell karttjänst att böja sig efter privata företags reklamskrivningar, när dessa bryter mot svenska språkets gängse skrivregler?
Paweł_M (2025-05-22 22:07:53+00:00): Przypadkiem wysłałem zestaw zmian z JOSM bez poprawnego opisu.
Poprawny to: "Poprawa ukształtowania przydrożnych trawników przy Grunwaldzkiej na bazie BDOT 500"
Ewrt1 (2025-07-14 23:22:07+00:00): Reverted - Not the name

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168939298