piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
MxxCon (2023-09-23 21:40:39+00:00): Hello.
Looking at the street imagery from March 29th I still see all the features that you deleted. Is that not accurate?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141523724
Michael Alvarez (2023-09-24 00:23:57+00:00): Nope, not at all, it’s completely different. There’s a soccer field now, chess tables and a small gazebo; the whole place was demolished and mad anew. I can’t really accurately map them since the street imagery hasn’t been updated to reflect the new equipment.
MaciekMma (2023-09-22 20:16:15+00:00): O, znakomicie. Pytanie tylko jedno, czemu zdjales service=driveway z kilku drog dojazdowych?
puchaczowsky (2023-09-22 21:03:55+00:00): stosowałem się do zasad wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:service%3Ddriveway):

"Ogólnie mówiąc, na lub wokół parkingu (amenity=parking) – stosujemy highway=service bez service=*"
MaciekMma (2023-09-23 06:27:05+00:00): dziekuje za info
wolfbert (2023-09-22 09:31:45+00:00): Die Hausnummer kann entfallen, das das Haus selbst ja schon eine Adresse hat.
literan (2023-09-20 20:30:00+00:00): это еще не школа. Когда школа будет работать, тогда и поставим тег школы
redd (2023-09-20 19:37:25+00:00): Danke!
Patr1k_P (2023-09-22 13:50:21+00:00): treba to písať pod changeset daného užívateľa! inak to časom pridá znovu
Luc Gential (2024-05-09 21:27:08+00:00): Bonjour, vous aviez ajouté quatre anciens téléskis. La clé disused=yes (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused:*) ne convient pas puisque les téléskis ont été démontés. J'ai ajouté le préfixe removed:* sur les 3 remontées qui subsistaient (la 4e a été supprimée par un autre utilisateur). Beaucoup de remontées mécaniques ont été démontées à Valloire (voir http://www.ski-valloire.net/domski/rm_old.php) et certains jugeront qu'il n'est peut-être pas nécessaire de les ajouter. Salutations,
Jordi MF (2023-09-20 21:16:33+00:00): Hola Ray,
No parec correcta edición. Ten en cuenta que la base de datos de OSM se actualiza al instante y hay muchas persones que dependen de que la información sea real. Así que no es recomendable hacer pruebas de est tipo. Por favor, si es el caso, elimina este nodo.
Saludos
beaufort-fosse (2023-10-02 10:37:36+00:00): Thank you for doing this.
muralito (2023-09-20 20:51:04+00:00): Hi. Please respect the OSM rule, One Feature, One Element. One amenity=hospital in this case.
LeNetsi (2023-09-21 21:17:45+00:00): Hello Muralito!

 I see that OSM Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dhospital) does state that only a singular amenity feature is needed. As the amenity already existed on the building, I will remove my area feature.  Thanks pointing that out!
user_5359 (2023-09-21 15:37:56+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Du hast dem Gebäude einen Namen verpasst, aber eigentlich willst Du mitteilen, dass im Gebäude eine Firma Kraft GmbH untergebracht ist. Es fehlt also die Beschreibung der Firma. Hinweise dazu findest Du unter https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a. Hinweis: Die deutsche Fassung der Seite ist sehr umfangreich und benötigt eines um vollständig zu laden.
MxxCon (2023-09-23 21:44:27+00:00): Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you tag this feature as open 24/7 when their website states they are open 12:15pm-10:00pm?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141526360
okokokok1999 (2023-09-23 21:54:39+00:00): I added that by accident. The UI was a bit confusing and might've added inaccurate timings by mistake.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141526360
MxxCon (2023-09-23 21:57:28+00:00): Alrighty. I fixed it up. 👍🙂
christianfosli (2023-10-22 19:58:35+00:00): Note that Eikebakken and Rødkløverveien are no longer connected since a few years ago. See my earlier edit: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137929457#map=19/58.88321/5.67834
Jørn Sigurd Vathne (2023-11-18 15:06:29+00:00): Thanks for the feedback! 

-Removed connectivity for cars due to road connectivity no longer exists.

+Added pedestrian/bike connectivity between Rødkløverveien and the footway inbetween Rødkløverveien and Eikebakken.
shu0410 (2023-09-20 18:28:33+00:00): yeahhhh
Sandal man (2023-09-21 08:53:46+00:00): Hello,
Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-)
But please make smalle change sets, this helps others in tracking changes. 
Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thank you.
Eino81 (2023-09-26 10:04:03+00:00): Hi Martin, was this new road accessible or is that still closed, because of the construction? I saw you updated that 6 days ago...
woodpeck_repair (2023-11-14 13:31:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 144011037, 144011002, 144010984, 144011043 where the changeset comment is: revert edits des users Zinkeisen
map per (2023-09-21 12:01:35+00:00): Wegen review_requested:
Die Änderung sieht gut aus, danke!
Olaf der Mapper (2023-09-20 19:11:10+00:00): Hallo, das war, bevors zum Café wurde, eine Wiese (landuse=meadow) und schaut auch noch im Luftbild so aus. Wurde das wirklich so schnell aufgeforstet?

LG Olaf
Marco Amadori (2023-10-28 18:01:47+00:00): It is now open again. Please recreate the node 2194699111, v5 - Le Radici.
Liongrass (2023-10-28 18:05:56+00:00): Great to hear! Will recreate it
eggie (2023-09-20 21:18:18+00:00): Welkom bij OSM..
Je info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande Kadasteradresnodes.
De postcode klopte niet en heb ik aangepast.
MVG
eggie
felipeeugenio (2023-09-21 14:10:21+00:00): Hola Claudia. Esto tiene estándar de motorway realmente en la actualidad? se terminó el proyecto?

otra cosa, el que un camino sea motorway no significa automáticamente que las caleteras sean primary. Por favor contactarnos en Telegram para mayor información sobre las categorías.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141527616
Claudia Magallanes S (2023-09-22 11:28:41+00:00): Hola Felipe, respecto a la via motorway esta en funcionamiento y operativo desde junio del 2023 bajo operacion y cobro free flow por parte del grupo costanera.
Estas obras se dividieron en 3 etapas: el Acceso Sur que es el habitual, Acceso Norte que son estas obras en el sector lo boza / lo echervers y pronto se inicia la fase 3 que une el enlace inicial de la autopista al camino diego barros ortiz.

Te dejo contrato de concesiones de la fase 2 : https://concesiones.mop.gob.cl/proyectos/Paginas/detalle_adjudicacion.aspx?item=5

Diseño render de la fase 3: https://concesiones.mop.gob.cl/proyectos/Paginas/detalle_adjudicacion.aspx?item=203

Noticias del grupo costanera del poryecto:

https://grupocostanera.cl/concesiones/acceso-vial-amb/index.html

https://www.accesovialamb.cl/apertura-de-tramo-b1-acceso-norte-al-aeropuerto/

El proyecto fase 2 considera autopista y caletera y en cierto tramos la caletera entra a la motorway y se sale en la próxima salida para continuar como caletera.
felipeeugenio (2023-09-22 11:56:17+00:00): Gracias Claudia. Los links los conocemos. El tema es totalmente otro, pero ya lo estamos conversando con otros maperos.

Por lo pronto, si quieres hablar de autopistas hablamos de autopistas, pero cambiaste la categoría de otros caminos además.

No obstante,si tienes algún plano con las señaléticas y velocidades máximas sería de gran ayuda.

saludos
skquinn (2023-09-21 11:06:49+00:00): In the future, we would appreciate it if you would please use descriptive changeset comments. Every changeset has "amendments"; this by itself tells us nothing about what has been changed and why. Thanks!
Taya_S (2023-09-21 09:39:51+00:00): Hello andrum99,

Thanks for your additions, but I think you forgot to add the scrub areas to the forest MP. They are now overlapping. 

Sincerely,
Taya
andrum99 (2023-09-21 10:57:33+00:00): That was sort of deliberate: I had trouble punching holes in the forest for the clearfell areas. The scrub areas are also still part of the Glenmore Forest, and render as scrub on the default map. The in-browser editor would not let me "merge" the scrub areas, to punch a hole in the forest, as it kept saying that one or more of the areas was not fully downloaded. My usual workaround of going round the whole edge of the area didn't work for some reason. If the scrub areas need to be removed from the forest, then I would be grateful for any assistance. Is there perhaps an editor that would work better for this task?
Taya_S (2023-09-21 11:18:57+00:00): Ah, I see.
Relations are definitely a bit cumbersome to work with on iD yeah. 

You can just add all of the scrub areas as a seperate inner member to the relationship. It does not really matter if the inners are touching as OSM explicitly allows that. (With the exception of inners touching eachother with just 1 node.)

I've added all the scrub areas as inner member. It will probably take a week or so for the renderer to update, it doesn't update if only relations are changed. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141553626

Sincerely,
Taya
eggie (2023-09-20 21:19:38+00:00): Welcome to OSM. I don't think this is a castle.
Greetz,
eggie
felipeeugenio (2023-09-21 11:49:32+00:00): Hola. Por favor dejar de cambiar clasificaciones de caminos. No por lo menos sin informarse de lo que significan.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141528354
felipeeugenio (2023-09-21 14:06:59+00:00): HOla Claudia. Nos quedamos esperándote en Telegram para conversar. Tienes alguna evidencia de que este sea el nombre oficial del camino? Me imagino que a estas alturas ya debes entender que hay una comunidad de gente que hace el mapa constantemente y que no es cosa de llegar y cambiar todo, menos cosas así de importantes.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141528379
Claudia Magallanes S (2023-09-22 11:42:38+00:00): Totalmente, no haría un cambio sabiendo que afecta demasiado para la obtención de datos.
Como se respondió en el otro post, esta autopista es el acceso sur aeropuerto amb según concesiones que adjunte. (fase 1)
Además esta operado por el grupo costanera, adjuntado anteriormente. 

Nunca se llamo aeropuerto, solo es el nombre que se observa en la salida de la autopista vespucio norte express pero no el nombre real.
felipeeugenio (2023-09-22 11:50:48+00:00): Hola Claudia. Es por este tipo de respuestas que necesitamos conversar en Telegram. Por que definitivamente estás confundiendo tu trabajo con OSM. Yo también trabajo en el mundo de las concesionarias y el lenguaje usado en ese mundo no tiene relación con lo que se plasma en el mapa con las directrices y criterios de OSM.

Por lo pronto, la palabra "Sur" que agregaste tampoco es el nombre "real".
Barroszt (2023-09-20 19:18:08+00:00): I tak miałem kolejne konfliktu edycji, tak to jest gdy robię dzisiaj, a publikuje innego dnia.
RCRalph (2023-09-20 20:21:53+00:00): Dzięki za wycofanie wycofania
Aleksandar Matejevic (2023-09-25 08:59:56+00:00): Good job
Vonter (2023-09-21 03:31:47+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Congrats on your first contributions to OpenStreetMap! If you’re interested in connecting with other mappers, do consider joining the regional OSM groups:

OSM Bengaluru

Telegram: https://telegram.me/OSM_BLR

Matrix: https://matrix.to/#/#OSM_BLR:matrix.org

OSM India

Telegram: https://telegram.me/OSMIndia

Matrix: https://matrix.to/#/#osm-in-general:matrix.org

Happy Mapping!
Hufkratzer (2023-09-20 23:15:55+00:00): Hi,
du hast building=yes entfernt. Ist das denn kein Gebäude? Wenn es eine Reithalle ist, kannst du building=riding_hall verwenden, wenn es ein Pferdestall ist building=stable; siehe OSM-Wiki.
woodpeck_repair (2023-11-14 13:31:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 144011037, 144011002, 144010984, 144011043 where the changeset comment is: revert edits des users Zinkeisen
josmougn (2023-11-26 15:31:10+00:00): il y a peu de règles dans osm mais une ligne de conduite de base est "on ne tague pas pour le rendu" (ni pour le routage).
Si geovelo marche mal s'adresser aux développeurs de leur outil de routage.
Par exemple sur ce way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100134452 ça n'a pas de sens de mettre bicycle=designated et foot=designated car par défaut un track est accessible aux vélos et aux piétons et en plus il y avait déjà un bicycle=yes (tout aussi redondant) que le routage de geovelo prend en compte.
Idem pour les voie de service et les path, il faudrait supprimé tous les bicycle=designated et foot=designated bicycle=yes foot=yes ajoutés de manière abusive et redondants vu les accès par défaut prévus dans osm.
Carto'Cité (2024-01-04 12:17:07+00:00): Bonjour Traductator,
Je rejoins josmougn sur ses remarques. Pour faire évoluer le routage il y a deux solutions : améliorer les données et/ou améliorer les algorithmes. Sachant aussi qu'il y a autant de profils de routage que de cyclistes. Donc peut-être qu'il vaut mieux ajouter des informations justes pour favoriser ou défavoriser leur « cyclabilité ».
Pour l'utilisation de bicycle=designated, il ne faut l'utiliser que si une signalétique existe tels que des panneaux ou de la peinture. Pour bicycle=yes, il ne faut normalement l'utiliser que lorsqu'on a un cas particulier où les cyclistes devrait ne pas être autorisés mais le sont quand-même par la force des choses et en l'absence de signalétique (là on reviendrait sur du bicycle=designated). Par exemple une portion de trottoir de fait utilisable par les cyclistes mais sans signalétique à proximité ou éloigner pour le justifier réellement.
À ta disposition pour en discuter 🙂
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
Traductator (2024-01-08 09:33:05+00:00): Bonjour,
J'avais raté le premier message.
J'ai fait les modifications dont vous parlez. Je ne crois pas en avoir oublié, si c'est le cas et que vous les voyez, je ne serais pas vexé si vous faite la modification vous-même.
Savez-vous comment faire pour que Géovélo propose ces routes à la place de faire des détours avec les voitures ? Surtout que c'est aussi l'itinéraire le plus court quand on part de la rue de Viry pour aller à l'intersection de la Rue de la Liberté et de la rue Marceau, or, ça représente une partie de mon itinéraire.

Pour conclure, bonne année et tous mes vœux !
Carto'Cité (2024-01-10 13:09:30+00:00): Bonjour Traductator,
Merci beaucoup pour ton retour ! 🙂
Je te souhaite également une bonne année.
Est-ce que tu pourrais envoyer un lien avec l'itinéraire en question. Essaie avec BRouter Web (https://brouter.de/brouter-web/) pour montrer les deux itinéraires : celui que tu voudrais et celui que Geovelo fait prendre. Pas besoin de mettre tout l'itinéraire, juste la partie avec l'alternative. Si tu ne connais pas BRouter tu verras c'est un outil vraiment génial et tu peux contraindre l'itinéraire facilement.
N'hésite pas si tu as des questions.
Charles
Strubbl (2023-09-26 22:08:51+00:00): Hi pehyff, danke für die Bearbeitung. In das Feld für den Eigennamen bitte keine beschreibenden Worte eintragen, sondern wirklich nur den Eigennamen, der idealerweise vor Ort auch  so beschriftet ist.

Danke, viel Spaß beim Kartieren & Viele Grüße
opendcc (2023-09-21 06:14:53+00:00): Hallo, Du hast hier maxspeed=70 getagged; es gab aber bereits maxspeed-Werte (unterschiedlich in beiden Richtungen, als Datenquelle war 'Verkehrszeichen' angegeben. Woher stammen die 70?
Don-Alfonso (2023-09-21 06:31:30+00:00): Als Ortsansässiger fahre ich die AÖ 25 regelmäßig von Tyrlaching nach Kirchweidach und wieder zurück. Dabei habe ich die Beschilderung in beiden Richtungen beobachtet. Es ist richtig, dass in der Vergangenheit die Begrenzung in Richtung Kirchweidach (nach Norden) bei 60km/h lag. Vor geraumer Zeit wurde die Beschilderung jedoch geändert.
opendcc (2023-09-21 06:39:08+00:00): Hallo,
dann muß man die anderen maxspeed-Werte weglöschen. Habe ich soeben gemacht und 70 mit Quelle 'Zeichen' angegeben.
Frans S (2023-09-22 09:56:46+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
A: Inaccurate mapped. 
C: Collecting multiple buildings and mapping them as 1 building.
D: Connecting nodes of buildings to other buildings or features like roads and residential areas.
E. Rectangular buildings not squared.
H: A courtyard or a clearing not mapped into a building.
Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141531091
Frans S (2023-09-22 09:56:59+00:00): Hello again.  FYI
Where clearly visible, add courtyards please.
This is how to map a building with courtyards.

 1   Draw the outer outline of the building as an area. Tag as a building
 2  Draw each of the inner courtyards/plazas as areas. Tag as needed, or not at all
 3  Hold 'SHIFT' and select all the areas
 4  Press 'C' to create a multipolygon with all the areas
 Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141531091
Hugues Ross (2023-09-21 09:44:46+00:00): Was this an accidental change? The amenity seems to have been placed in the middle of the road, it looks like something that'd normally exist in/next to a building...
Graptemys (2023-09-27 16:49:23+00:00): Deleted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141829292
Filip009 (2023-10-04 08:18:51+00:00): Dobrý deň, dávajte si pozor na spájanie ciest a administratívnej hranice. Nie všetky čiary, ktoré v JOSM-e vidíte sú cesty. Tie prerušované oranžové čiary sú administratívne hranice. V JOSM-e existuje taký nástroj, ktorý sa volá filtre. Odporúčam zapnúť a skryť si hranice, aby ste k nim cesty zbytočne nepripájali. (boundary=*) Zatiaľ som narazil na 4 také cesty. Keď cestu pripojíte namiesto k ceste k hranici, tak potom navigácia aj tak nebude fungovať.
jozefklacko (2023-10-04 15:45:49+00:00): ahoj. dakujem
citrula (2023-09-20 21:56:31+00:00): Welcome to OSM!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141531409
jjyach (2023-09-21 11:55:02+00:00): Please use a relation of a stream area within the scrub area.  This makes it render nicer and is much easier for others to maintain in the future.  Streams also should be limited to the main channel rather than the flood plain.
woodpeck_repair (2023-11-07 00:02:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 143714133 where the changeset comment is: revert von edits eines users nach selbstlöschung
dgmapping (2023-09-24 19:28:36+00:00): FYI - fixme in https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11206280748

I can confirm the motocross race track does indeed cross with XCO bike trail:

https://fotoladu.maaamet.ee/?basemap=kiirortofoto&zlevel=15,26.94990,59.36051&overlay=tyhi
https://www.strava.com/heatmap#18.14/26.95021/59.36020/gray/ride
jemm (2023-09-26 07:15:52+00:00): As strange as it is - we will leave the ways in the crossing state then.
drnoble (2023-09-24 14:48:01+00:00): Thanks for adding this, but I'm not sure the bit on Stafford Street/Alva Street should be mapped as a cycleway, it gives the false impression this might be segregated like Melville Street. Probably better to specify these sections as not one-way for cycling.
osmuser63783 (2023-10-06 18:22:38+00:00): I've changed it now :-) @Hamish Dobbie. Welcome to OpenStreetMap. We only draw cycle paths as separate ways when they are physically segregated by a kerb. When they are just painted on the road we just add them as tags on the road (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway). Let me know if you have any questions
Aleksandar Matejevic (2023-09-25 10:55:57+00:00): Why are you changing this to level 2, it is not a country
Hassan Arara (2023-09-25 13:23:43+00:00): Dar Massalit is the country, and now  they are in the process of revising their documents for
Treaty of Gulanei, September 8, 1919, between the Sultanate of Dar Massalit and the English and French Governments
Dar Massalit joined Sudan on June 17, 1920. 
After the two-time genocide of the Dar Massalit nation in 2003 and 2023
Casey_boy (2023-09-25 13:37:39+00:00): Have raised in the community forum - and also about name change: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/west-darfur-masalit-tagging/104208
Casey_boy (2023-09-26 13:08:07+00:00): I have reverted back to admin_level 4. There appears to be no international basis for considering this region a country. I also think the name change is not supported but have left for now. 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141774129
Casey_boy (2023-09-26 16:24:34+00:00): Hassan Arara has again changed the admin_level back to 2 in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141780003.
M!dgard (2023-09-20 21:22:04+00:00): This reverts https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140999255 . See discussion there for rationale.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-09-20 21:20:19+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4278999920
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1209551883

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
AndersAndersson (2023-09-21 05:52:38+00:00): Hello
What happened here?
The place of the nodes of a nature reserve cannot be moved. Thay are leagally placed at a certain position.
VLD304 (2023-09-21 17:33:12+00:00): Hello AndersAndersson,

I slightly adjusted the nodes by mimicking the placed nodes geometry that were overlapping with each other in the relation causing an error code “intersecting ways” in JOSM. I reviewed the map provided on the county website to verify if the lines intersected before making the change. https://ext-geoportal.lansstyrelsen.se/standard/?appid=fa2d2d9365904f1f926bb38787423c3b&customquery=Naturreservat,NVR_ID=2002115&highlight. 

Let me know if you have anymore questions or concerns about this edit.

Thank you.
Baloo Uriza (2023-09-20 23:07:26+00:00): Not a useful change, that's implied for that kind of barrier.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141532494
Glassman (2023-09-20 21:52:23+00:00): OSM was started in England so we use their tagging scheme. A path is would we would call a trail. A sidewalk is highway=footway.  If the footway is alongside of a road, then we add the tag, footway=sidewalk.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141532716
izaacmp (2023-09-20 23:22:17+00:00): That makes sense. I believe I've used the correct nomenclature for the various sections now.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-09-20 21:50:17+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11206336231

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
CurlingMan13 (2023-11-20 03:35:24+00:00): Please use more descriptive changeset comments.  "987292" tells me nothing about what you did.  You can read about changeset comments and their importance here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
jmsbert (2023-12-28 21:30:45+00:00): Hello Uwaina,
you contributed to this project of HOT by using RapiD with building contures recognized by AI. Please carefully check the features the AI proposes against the task imagery. In this case the AI seem to have used a different source of aerial imagery. The positions and sizes do not match to the task imagery which was BING. Please align and resizes the proposed buildings carefully with the project's imagery before uploading.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141533963