piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mueschel (2025-03-19 13:20:35+00:00): Hi,
you added many 'ref:insee' - however the common spelling is uppercase 'ref:INSEE'. Could you change that?
Mathias_ADAV (2025-03-19 14:13:49+00:00): Hi, thanks i did it. I hope there is no others mistake..!
TrickyFoxy (2025-03-18 19:51:15+00:00): 👋 В правом меню редактора есть кнопка «Настройки фонового изображения». Выберите там спутниковые снимки ESRI — они свежее
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:49:05+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401327
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-03-20 21:33:07+00:00): This changeset deleted a portion of the highway.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163769619
NeisBot (2025-03-18 11:27:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was flagged because your added description contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2025-03-21 20:06:32+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/163922798
grzegorz75jan (2025-03-18 22:05:08+00:00): It's a shame it's not a larger area to open. Please see for yourself https://osmcha.org/changesets/163770300
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163770300
grzegorz75jan (2025-03-18 22:07:00+00:00): It's a shame it's not a larger area to open. Please see for yourself https://osmcha.org/changesets/163770300
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163770300
grzegorz75jan (2025-03-18 22:08:30+00:00): It's a shame it's not a larger area to open. Please see for yourself https://osmcha.org/changesets/163770300
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163770300
eggie (2025-03-18 11:53:45+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Alle begin is moeilijk. Het pad heb ik losgemaakt van de administratieve grens van Zuidhorn.

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-03-18 12:14:45+00:00): Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=163770405
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:48:59+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401324
rskedgell (2025-03-18 13:14:06+00:00): As you map around Grove Park, you'll probably come across a lot of very small natural=wood polygons where one user has mapped the canopies of individual trees. I might have a quick stab at replacing these with natural=tree + diameter_crown=* nodes derived from the centroids of the polygons this afternoon.
RedAuburn (2025-03-18 13:29:55+00:00): ah, tagging diameter could be cool 👍️ i'll try and do it in future (iD measurement tools should make it easy)
rskedgell (2025-03-18 17:55:40+00:00): My initial attempt, for micro natural=wood polygons in LB Lewisham with area < 10 m^2 and based on OSM extracts from yesterday is https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163786073

I hadn't realised how much that mapper had abused natural=scrub. Unfortunately they've got form for blatant mapping for the renderer and don't reply to changeset comments. If you look at the edit history of area:highway=residential polygons around there, you'll see that a lot of them were initially mis-mapped as highway=service + area=yes because that is rendered in OSM Carto.

See also https://diamondgeezer.blogspot.com/2024/05/river-wogebourne.html
MaliMrav (2025-06-12 13:39:16+00:00): This change is going to be reverted, because it looks like the author was just fooling around, or playing some game that involves map.
bxl-forever (2025-03-18 13:20:31+00:00): Hello, and welcome back.

I wish to inform you that we had to undo your changeset.

Please do not try to "help" us by adding addresses on company nodes.  Addresses in Brussels are already on the map and should not be repeated multiple times, which would result in unwanted data duplication.  I fixed your edit by linking it to the existing address point.  I also fixed a mistake in the phone number syntax.
Gerben (2025-03-18 13:33:07+00:00): Sorry, but the given address from OSM of CER.be is not correct. it states:
Bedrijf Community of European Railway and Infrastructure Companies, Montoyerstraat, Brussel, Brussel-Hoofdstad, Brussel Hoofdstad, 1000, België
But CER is located at Kunstlaan 53 according to their website cer.be
Sorry if I did it the wrong way, I thought it is open source, and I was given a way to correct it.
Also EIM (eimrail.org) was missing, so I tired to add it.
bxl-forever (2025-03-18 19:47:08+00:00): The address on their website is nbr 53 and it is explicitely linked to the address node with nbr 53
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15887304
OSM data is correct, that is the most important.

It looks like the text you copied in your comment comes from Nominatim—this is the software behind the search bar on osm.org.  People who are unfamiliar with OSM are often confused by how it works; this system is not meant to return an accurate address, it is just a simple reverse geocoder which returns the nearest street; it does not work well in large cities.

Have a nice day.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:48:52+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401323
Jrachi (2025-03-18 20:11:36+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto nella mappa più bella del mondo!
Vedo che hai appena iniziato.
Hai letto qualcosa sulle relazioni di tipo hiking?
Le relazioni escursionistiche possono essere composte solo dalle way e dalla segnaletica.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route=hiking

Con il ruolo site non so cosa possa significare.
Per Openstreetmap site è:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:site
e per estensione puoi leggere:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?search=site&title=Special%3ASearch&fulltext=1

Ivo
kmpoppe_repair (2025-04-10 11:25:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 164763734 where the changeset comment is: Reverting undiscussed mass edits to shops in Germany that add mostly incorrect addresses
maraf24 (2025-04-08 11:56:55+00:00): Skąd pochodzi ta nazwa?
Langlaeufer (2025-03-18 17:08:58+00:00): Hi LaternaMagica,
negative sollten nur für unterirdische/verdeckte Objekte verwendet werden. Gewässer sollten normalerweise in Layer 0 (also einfach ohne Layer) liegen.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163771433
LaternaMagica (2025-03-21 16:37:07+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis, habe es angepasst.
rskedgell (2025-03-18 13:58:29+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You probably didn't intend to delete Norway Drove, which is part of public footpath ER14 ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/49431750 ). I've undeleted it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163776528

I notice that it's tagged with motor_vehicle=yes, which implies a legal right for (all) motor vehicles to use the track. This seems unlikely for a public footpath - should it be motor_vehicle=private?
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-06 03:05:07+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164573389
Anim Mouse (2025-03-19 12:14:06+00:00): I wish this is true; this will greatly improve travel times.
NeisReview (2025-03-19 17:40:03+00:00): #HighwayChanges

Hello, welcome to OSM.

In this changeset, some types of highway are being added or modified by you. 

Could we know the sources that you used? Thank you.

More information about the changeset: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=163771590
NeisRevert (2025-03-21 20:54:34+00:00): Partly reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163874879
eggie (2025-03-18 12:12:30+00:00): Dag Sven.. Probeer direct op de adresnode bij te taggen. Ik heb de info samengevoegd met adresnode 61
MVG
eggie
sven020 (2025-03-18 13:44:05+00:00): Hi eggie,

Ik ben nieuw hier. Kun je me vertellen wat een adresnode is?

Groet sven
eggie (2025-03-18 13:54:38+00:00): Sinds enige tijd importeren we de gebouwen en adressen vanuit de BAG (Kadaster)
Elk gebouw heeft één of meer adressen. Die zijn dan getagd op een knoop (node)
Geen idee of je dat allemaal kunt bewerken in Organic Mpas. Die app is ook maar beperkt.
Nr 61 bevindt zicht iets ten zuiden van pand de Noorderburgh.
Dat adres geeft de website op.
MVG
eggie
MaliMrav (2025-06-12 13:39:14+00:00): This change is going to be reverted, because it looks like the author was just fooling around, or playing some game that involves map.
kmpoppe_repair (2025-04-10 11:25:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 164763734 where the changeset comment is: Reverting undiscussed mass edits to shops in Germany that add mostly incorrect addresses
marc__marc (2025-04-01 21:33:14+00:00): Bonjour,
Merci pour ces ajouts
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12676265481
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12676301963
il y a une confusion entre borne de recharge et station :)
il n'y a qu'une station mais apparemment 2 voir 4 bornes.
j'ai ajouté les informations de l'opendata Cordialement,
Marc
kmpoppe_repair (2025-04-10 11:25:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 164763734 where the changeset comment is: Reverting undiscussed mass edits to shops in Germany that add mostly incorrect addresses
eggie (2025-03-18 13:38:21+00:00): Dag Willem In OSM Nederland gebruiken we uitsluitend de adresnode om bedrijven op bij te taggen.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-03-18 13:45:52+00:00): Naar node verplaatst..
gr eggie
kmpoppe_repair (2025-04-10 11:26:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 164763734 where the changeset comment is: Reverting undiscussed mass edits to shops in Germany that add mostly incorrect addresses
MaliMrav (2025-06-12 13:39:12+00:00): This change is going to be reverted, because it looks like the author was just fooling around, or playing some game that involves map.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-03-18 12:30:43+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, zamień addr:place na addr:city. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12676340862

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
ceyu (2025-03-18 15:06:48+00:00): Vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag! In der Tat kann ich mich erinnern, hier ein Radargerät gesehen zu haben.

Das Radargerät sollte aber besser ein Teil der Straße sein, mit einem Indikator in welche Richtung es schaut: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dspeed_camera
Papryczka (2025-03-26 19:29:06+00:00): Cześć, dzięki za twój wkład w nasz projekt, niestety twoje zmiany są błędne, więc muszę je wszystkie wycofać. 
- Ścieżki rowerowe, które dodałeś, nie istnieją w rzeczywistości (nie ma ich na zdjęciach satelitarnych) oraz miejscami przecinają budynki i drogi (dodałeś przejazd rowerowy przez drogę ekspresową)
- Zmieniłeś drogę na ścieżkę rowerową
-  Stosujesz nazwy opisowe (Tag "name" używamy, żeby określić oficjalną nazwę czegoś)
Jeśli faktycznie przez te drogi prowadzą szlaki rowerowe, zachęcam do zamapowania ich z użyciem relacji (route=bicycle, type=route)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164135850
Timmi Studio | Dorin Vasilescu - Photographer (2025-03-22 10:01:45+00:00): Scusa, come i corrieri non trovano mai questo numero, ho provato di aggiungere tutte le info, come ho fatto anche su altre mappe. Capisco che forse ho aggiunto tante info, ma penso che non sia un motivo a rimuovere tutto. Se mi puo dare un consiglio come fare meglio, la usero. Grazie
Jacopo (2025-03-22 10:23:10+00:00): Ciao, nessun problema, semplicemente avevi aggiunto le informazioni dello studio di fotografia sul nodo dell'indirizzo mentre vanno segnate su un nodo separato. Io ho semplicemente fatto questo, ho aggiunto un nodo con le informazioni dello studio di fotografia. 
Il concetto generale è "un elemento, un nodo".
Per qualsiasi cosa sentiamoci
Ciao
Jacopo
Timmi Studio | Dorin Vasilescu - Photographer (2025-03-22 10:32:02+00:00): Ahh, ok, scusami ancora cerco di capire come funziona. Allora, per aggiungere il numero  288R, che per me e piu importante che sia li, lo devo fare sul nodo dell' indirizzo, giusto?
Jacopo (2025-03-22 10:42:56+00:00): Sì, il nodo dell'indirizzo include anche il numero civico. Attualmente il numero 288 R è già presente, così come gli altri numeri civici della via
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-21 07:34:48+00:00): Hello!

You used
traffic_calming=hump;
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4958529412/history

Have you maybe meant
traffic_calming=hump
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
RedAuburn (2025-04-21 16:40:07+00:00): oops, fixed thanks
NeisReview (2025-03-20 07:54:33+00:00): #UnexplainedChanges #Test

Hello, welcome to OSM.

Could you please clarify the purpose behind your map changes? It's not entirely clear from the edited data and your added description. Also, what was used as a source of your activity?

Looking forward to your response. 
Thank you.
NeisRevert (2025-03-21 20:56:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/163924305 where the changeset comment is: 
Remove testdata
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:48:45+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401318
TrickyFoxy (2025-03-18 20:11:57+00:00): 👋 Не добавляйте названия вида 
«Подход к детской площадке». Таких названий официально нет
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-06 03:05:08+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164573389
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:48:40+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401315
Vinber-Pro (2025-03-19 17:31:49+00:00): la cartographie des services et directions continue :)

DAJ et les abbréviations, je les mettrai par exemple ici dans short_name=DAJ
Nirilanto Joela (2025-03-20 02:56:43+00:00): Bonjour,
Ah oui, t'as raison. Merci beaucoup
MaliMrav (2025-06-12 13:26:35+00:00): This change is going to be reverted, because it looks like the author was just fooling around, or playing some game that involves map.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:48:34+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401314
woodpeck_repair (2025-03-18 13:07:02+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 163767872, 163767991, 163768059, 163768191, 163768299, 163768312, 163768343, 163768350, 163768411, 163768419, 163768455, 163768458, 163768478, 163768519, 163768532, 163768576, 163768601, 163768624, 163768626, 163768843, 163768864, 163768965, 163768981, 163769048, 163770911.
MaliMrav (2025-06-12 13:23:08+00:00): This change is going to be reverted, because it looks like the author was just fooling around, or playing some game that involves map.
A67-A67 (2025-03-18 21:23:33+00:00): Hoi Grimbaert,

Het voorvoegsel Sint komt nogal vreemd over voor een protestantse kerk. Heb je hier een andere bron voor dan Wikipedia? De gemeente noemt het zelf de Maartenskerk, onder welke naam de kerk al jaren in OSM stond. https://maartenskerkgemeente.nl/
A67-A67 (2025-03-24 19:35:18+00:00): Ik heb de naamgeving volgens de gemeente hersteld.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:48:27+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401308
CapitaineMoustache (2025-03-18 14:04:03+00:00): Bonjour,
Je m'interroge sur la pertinence de la suppression des trottoirs de l'Avenue Charles Bacqué.
Ceux-ci existent toujours et leur tracé étaient tout à fait corrects.

Quelles sont vos motivations ?
CapitaineMoustache (2025-03-19 17:33:01+00:00): Je pense qu'il vaudrait mieux annuler ce groupe de modifications.

Je vois également qu'il y a une méprise sur l'interprétation du tag "traffic_sign", normalement utilisé pour qualifier les panneaux routiers eux-mêmes (les poteaux et leurs panneaux accrochés).
C'est utile pour savoir d'où vient l'information d'un sens unique ou d'une limitation de vitesse pour un contributeur mais la signalétique peut être également présente directement sur les tronçons de route (ex : highway=stop ou highway=crossing) comme les passages piétons ou les lignes stop ou cédez-le-passage.
Voir le wiki OSM : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:crossing
Ça permet aux calculateurs d'itinéraire d'en prendre compte, il ne faut pas les transformer en panneau ou les supprimer.
CapitaineMoustache (2025-03-19 17:36:49+00:00): Voilà, je me suis permis d'annuler vos modifications : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163828139#map=17/43.611240/1.076823

N'hésitez pas à me contacter si vous avez des questions ou autre.

Bonne continuation !
CapitaineMoustache (2025-03-18 14:39:40+00:00): Bonjour,

Attention, vous avez ajouté des piscines privées.
Elles devraient contenir l'étiquette suivante :
access=private
pour indiquer qu'elles sont privées.

Sinon, L'Isle-Jourdain va compter pour la ville ayant le plus grand nombre de piscines publiques ! :D
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-30 17:12:58+00:00): hello! can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5074070 ?
empty_child (2025-03-20 08:55:42+00:00): RRIbarruri, добрый день
Не надо так переименовывать улицы. Перевод лежит в теге alt_name:ru
RRIbarruri (2025-03-21 07:24:15+00:00): добрый день. Не понял претензии, это же буквальный перевод
empty_child (2025-03-21 09:11:38+00:00): Мы используем буквальные переводы в ограниченном числе случаев. Ознакомьтесь с гайдлайном, пожалуйста (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Georgia_Abkhazia_South-Ossetia#Street_Naming_Rule_for_Different_Languages)
DD1GJ (2025-03-18 14:53:30+00:00): Revert, vandalism
rennwagen (2025-03-18 14:59:21+00:00): Bitte alle jagdstände löschen der staattsschutz ermittelt und drängt drauf das wir nicht noch mehr verlieren und hier die Informationsplattform bilden  die wege sind  ausversehen mit rein gerutscht
DD1GJ (2025-03-18 15:36:38+00:00): Wenn Behörden Probleme mit OSM haben, dann mögen sie sich bitte bei der unter https://openstreetmap.de/kontakt/ veröffentlichten Adresse für Behördenanfragen melden.

Die Community reagiert grundsätzlich nicht auf anonyme Accounts, die im ersten Änderungssatz nur löschen. Dies gilt auch für die Sockenpuppe XKLM23.
rennwagen (2025-03-18 16:14:39+00:00): Nein wir haben  ein Problem  das ihr fremdes Eigentum postet ohne unsere Erlaubnis  unter damit jagdgegner  unterstützt  eine Menge finanziellen und wirtschaftlichen Schaden zu erzielen  und dies ist glaube nicht euer Anliegen
DD1GJ (2025-03-18 16:32:16+00:00): Auch Organisationen können sich an die angegebene Kontaktadresse wenden, aber bitte nicht anonym.
woodpeck (2025-03-18 17:27:03+00:00): Ich habe einen Kommentar des Users "rennwagen" versteckt, in dem er seinen Namen, Adresse und Telefonnummer angegeben hat.
rennwagen (2025-03-18 17:38:17+00:00): Bitte  helfen  Sie  uns
streckenkundler (2025-03-18 18:06:58+00:00): ... die Sache ist, die Hochstände sind da... Sie sind frei in der Landschaft einsehbar. Es gibt ein freies Betretungsrecht in der Landschaft/ im Wald, welches nur durch bestimmte Regelungen eingeschränkt wird (bei Wald z.B. gezäunte Bereiche/Aufforstungen) ...uns selbst dann wäre das oft aus der Ferne weiterhin sichtbar.

Wenn es z.B. Leute gibt, die permanent Wehre an Gewässern sabotieren, willst du alle Wehre löschen? Wenn Leute permanent in einem bestimmten Waldgebiet Holz klauen, willst du den Wald löschen? Objektlöschung ist da keine Lösung. Die Sache ist aber auch, je nach verwendetem Luftbild sind Hochstände mitunter immernoch sichtbar. 

Auf der anderen Seite gibt es Objekte, die z.B. seit Juni 2011 (sic!) im Datenbestand sind. Da kann man wiederum nachfragen, ist das noch aktuell...
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:48:21+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401303
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:48:15+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401300
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-08 02:12:59+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164657866
NeisReview (2025-03-20 07:54:57+00:00): #UnexplainedChanges #Test

Hello, welcome to OSM.

Could you please clarify the purpose behind your map changes? It's not entirely clear from the edited data and your added description. Also, what was used as a source of your activity?

Looking forward to your response. 
Thank you.
NeisReview (2025-03-28 20:32:52+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163776277
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-06 03:05:09+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164573389
EdUden123 (2025-03-18 14:06:57+00:00): Hi, I didn't mean to delete the footpath. 
Somewhere it is listed as a road on a base data set, which is incorrect but shows up on SatNav as the route to my house and frequently delivery vehicles which should use Kingsdown Road use Norway Drove and get stuck. It shouldn't show any vehicles permitted, save for Farmers accessing the fields.
rskedgell (2025-03-18 14:23:51+00:00): No problem, thanks for the quick reply. That definitely sounds like motor_vehicle=private, so I've updated it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163777678

It may take a few weeks for changes to propagate to routing software.
osmviborg (2025-03-18 14:13:34+00:00): Varetægtssurrogat er ikke fængsling. Måske 'police=detention' er bedre.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-03-18 14:11:19+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Babinek":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/918843982
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/918843984
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1368749975
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1368749977

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NeisReview (2025-03-19 06:55:08+00:00): #NameCheck

Hello and welcome to OSM.

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits, particularly those concerning the names you've added or modified.

Some of these names caught my attention as they are quite unique or a bit unusual. Could you please confirm if these additions were intentional or if they might have been added mistakenly?

Looking forward to your response.

Thank you!
NeisReview (2025-03-28 20:27:29+00:00): #farmland #game ?
MaliMrav (2025-06-12 13:05:21+00:00): This change is going to be reverted, because it looks like the author was just fooling around, or playing some game that involves map.
Doc Sniper (2025-06-11 23:38:18+00:00): Unfortunately, the entrance of Immenstädterstraße 61 was moved in your edit. Please undo it.
eggie (2025-03-18 16:17:19+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
mueschel (2025-03-20 11:10:33+00:00): Hi,
you added two uncommon tags to the bus terminal: "jeep", "tricycle". What do they mean?
DD1GJ (2025-03-18 14:55:54+00:00): Revert, vandalism
VA00 (2025-09-07 17:38:25+00:00): Nie ma asfaltu?