piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
silversurfer83 (2023-11-12 20:13:59+00:00): Gude :)

Schön, dass du dich um deinen Shop hier bei OSM kümmerst.

Kleiner Tip zu den Öffnungszeiten: Als definierte Werte werden üblicherweise die englischen Abkürzugnen der Wochenentage genutzt.
Details liefert das Wiki unter
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours
und die Seite
https://projets.pavie.info/yohours/?
produziert direkt nutzbare Werte für dich.

Bei Fragen immer raus damit
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143943897
City-Bike (2023-11-12 20:41:50+00:00): Gude zurück, vielen Dank für den Hinweis. Habe es eben korrigiert. Hoffe es passt jetzt. BG
Daniel
silversurfer83 (2023-11-12 20:46:03+00:00): Gerne.
Sieht jetzt ganz gut aus :)

Gruß in die Hauptstadt
City-Bike (2023-11-13 08:59:41+00:00): Danke für Deinen Support!
Cheers
questmarker (2023-11-13 12:42:00+00:00): Du hast hier wichtige Werte der Grunewald Relation entfernt, die denke ich alle wieder hinzugefügt werden müssten.

Warum hast du die entfernt?
fritzmimi (2023-11-13 17:36:21+00:00): Hallo questmarker !
Oh Schreck ! So ein Murks. Mir ist beim Eintragen der Parkplatzfläche als 'inner' zur Relation 'Grunewald' nur aufgefallen, dass die grüne Begrenzung verschwunden war. Die Relation '3410' war weiterhin vorhanden. Sonst ist von mir nichts entfernt worden.
Was kann ich tun ?
Viele Grüße
fritzmimi
questmarker (2023-11-14 10:17:24+00:00): Wir können dein ganzes changeset rückgängig machen oder die Werte von Hand wieder hinzufügen.
 
Bist du denn bei der Lage der Parkplatzfläche sicher? Auf Luftbilder sieht der Parkplatz kleiner aus. Wenn du den Parkplatz als Fläche eintragen willst, hättest du außerdem den bisherigen Parkplatz Node entfernen müssen. Zusätzlich hast du die Parkplatzfläche mit der Straße verbunden, was man nicht machen soll. Flächen bitte nicht mit Straßen/Wegen verbinden.
questmarker (2023-11-14 21:53:44+00:00): Ich hab deine Änderung rückgängig gemacht. Den Namen des Aussichtspunkt hab ich wieder korrigiert und den Parkplatz als Fläche eingetragen.
fritzmimi (2023-11-16 09:32:18+00:00): Vielen Dank für Deine Hilfe!
fritzmimi
JeroenHoek (2023-11-13 09:22:18+00:00): Let op: je trekt de Grovestins te ver door. Onder het viaduct wordt dat de Kanaalweg.
A67-A67 (2023-11-13 20:09:59+00:00): Bedankt! Ik heb het fietspad opgeknipt en het deel vanaf het viaduct Kanaalweg genoemd.
SomeoneElse (2023-11-12 18:48:59+00:00): This follows on from the revert in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143943778 and the edit in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143944053 .  Source includes local_knowledge.
dadavid (2023-11-15 13:51:04+00:00): Hi, 
gibt es einen Grund, dass du hier nicht das im Wiki vorgegebene Standardformat für URLs und URIs nutzt? Du hast natürlich mit der Anpassung grundsätzlich Recht, die von dir eingetragene URL redirected auf die SSL Version der Seite, aber wenn nichts dagegen spricht würde ich gerne wieder ein führendes http(s):www. hinzufügen. 
VG und weiterhin happy mapping
David

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:contact:*
Spätzle mit Linsen (2023-11-15 19:10:07+00:00): Nein, da spricht nichts dagegen - wenn ich mich recht entsinne, was das noch veraltet als http:// (nicht als https://) eingetragen...
uvi (2023-12-01 06:12:20+00:00): Hallo a la Tobi, wenn du Fehlermeldungen erfasst und die Korrekturen dann selbst vornimmst, wäre es schön, wenn du sie auch wieder schließt. Im Moment müssen andere Mitwirkende für dich "aufräumen"! Schade, dass du allen Bitten zu einer Kommunikation bislang nicht gefolgt bist. VG Uwe
sheikchilli (2024-01-07 22:13:29+00:00): Hi, i would like to make you aware that you have accidentally given a road ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1222964329 ) a japanese name. Considering that this is in Turkey, i don't think it's correct
marc__marc (2024-09-28 14:36:43+00:00): Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11344312117
what's the meaing of source=evergreen ? 
leaf_cycle=evergreen ?
Regards,
Marc
Jordi MF (2024-09-28 17:21:46+00:00): Yes, it is an error. You can correct it or I will change it as soon as possible. Thank you.
marc__marc (2024-09-29 11:08:11+00:00): Thanks for the feedback. fixed
Penegal (2025-08-21 09:27:50+00:00): Hello!

I noticed that, with this changeset, you added exit_to=* on motorway junctions nodes. Beware that exit_to=* is considered deprecated, as it is imprecise, in favor of destination=* tags.

Regards.
unodecrespos (2023-11-13 11:15:54+00:00): Las imágenes espaciales que se utilizan son las de PNOA. Las vías de este conjunto de cambios estaban bien alineadas.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143945150
toponomastica_comune_arenzano (2023-11-13 18:09:18+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143981401 dressed
gscholz (2023-11-14 08:04:01+00:00): Hi SophieDP,
this changeset has created several errors in the OSM database like duplicate nodes and overlapping ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=3.88716&lat=45.03663&zoom=17&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=3.88615&lat=45.03572&zoom=17&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=143945286

This kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps. Can you please fix this?

You may also watch out for error warnings your editor shows before uploading. Please take this serious.

Kind regards
Guido
literan (2023-11-12 20:23:32+00:00): entrance=staircase

поправлю
voltairovicz (2023-11-12 19:49:52+00:00): Moja 20-tysięczna zmiana. Miałem zmapować coś uroczystszego, ale przegapiłem. Niemniej jednak brawo ja hah
grzegorz75jan (2023-11-13 11:08:10+00:00): Powinszować : )
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-11-17 12:10:26+00:00): Please don't delete roads
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143945777
MxxCon (2023-11-14 23:58:49+00:00): Hello.
Instead of outright deleting a closed biz, it's much better to use "disused:" lifecycle prefix as documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix or at the very least delete just the biz-specific tags but leave address info intact. Doing that not only preserves the history of this node, if there's ever a need to refer to it in the future, but it also keep the address searchable and routable.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143945932
Jaime Woo (2023-11-16 03:21:57+00:00): Sorry, I forgot I should use the "disused:" tag. It doesn't look very straightforward to revert this change. https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/731/how-can-i-revert-a-changeset
MxxCon (2023-11-16 03:26:25+00:00): That's a very old and outdated page :)
You can use https://revert.monicz.dev/ and give it this changeset's id.
gscholz (2023-11-26 07:55:14+00:00): Hi saranditown,
this changeset has destroyed the boundary relations of "Parque Palermo" and "Las Heras":

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-57.61632&lat=-38.02535&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=143946171

I have already fixed the relation of "Parque Palermo", but may be you like to fix the other relation to learn, what to do in this case and how to avoid such errors?

Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2023-12-07 09:11:46+00:00): Hi saranditown,
the relation of "Las Heras" is still broken, can you please fix this?
Guido
SomeoneElse (2023-11-12 20:32:57+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14179282 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14053625 look a bit odd here, TBH.
Allison P (2023-11-13 03:47:17+00:00): Please spell out street names in full
Vaidotas (2023-11-15 16:46:30+00:00): O šios dvi kelio atkarpos specialiai paliktos "highway=secondary"?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1137567990
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/136752205
Ar taip pat turėtų būti "tertiary" ?
Kirstukas (2023-11-15 18:47:16+00:00): Kadangi trumpos atkarpos, praslydo pro akis, logiškai turėtų būti viskas vienodai
Vaidotas (2023-11-16 16:18:16+00:00): Ačiū už patikslinimą, pataisiau.
MxxCon (2023-11-15 00:12:47+00:00): Hello.
Are you sure that all of these features are groyne and not breakwater?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143947238
wireguy (2023-11-15 20:48:21+00:00): Jacob Riis Park Historic District relation 9459897  seems to be unclosed now. Can you investigate and correct?
MxxCon (2023-11-29 01:50:57+00:00): Wireguy, I think I fixed it in changeset 144570269, could you confirm?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143947238
wireguy (2023-11-29 02:31:27+00:00): nope.  fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144570973
user_5359 (2023-11-14 07:55:37+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1223048432/hsitory. Please notice we use for every type of way the key highway (but I can see no path on Bing).
Please have also a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1223048434/history. Could you explain to me why the building has no corresponding name, but the number of storeys is very unusual, marked with your probable favourite value motorway_junction?
By the way, it would be nice if you would write more detailed comments, as it leaves too much room for interpretation for your concern.
jpennycook (2023-11-12 20:44:01+00:00): forgot to close changeset - also added some more roads and paths visible from aerial imagery in Potlatch in Hounsome Fields
aTarom (2023-11-13 06:50:34+00:00): Se ha restablecido un key de mapillary al formato alfanumérico antiguo, no es correcto el nuevo formato numérico de la v3?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7625378747/history

se ha restablecido una key de mapillary que no funciona, tienes una para sustituir que funcione?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7623358211/history

Saludos disculpa brevedad
yopaseopor (2023-11-13 07:10:10+00:00): Lo siento,me centré en aplicar el tag direction en las señales de tráfico y en eliminar el formato clave:subclave direction. Lo otro no lo miré,puede ser que restableciera algo incorrecto o ya antiguo.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-11-12 21:10:23+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9294229021
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1007437688

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
csomerville (2023-11-13 06:53:01+00:00): This was definitely at wrong location beforehand so kudos for the update.
Matt_ (2023-11-13 14:31:50+00:00): Thanks! And thank you for turning it into a way. More info: https://nid.sec.usace.army.mil/#/dams/system/TX01351/summary
os-emmer (2024-03-10 12:31:36+00:00): Hi Dimitar155,
you mapped here something using emergency=disaster_response before the proposal for this tag got approved. Can you confirm that this object fits to the current definition in the wiki?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1223056866
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:emergency=disaster_response
Dimitar155 (2024-03-10 13:54:31+00:00): Hi os-emmer,

Yes it does fit the definition. It's the civil protection department.

Happy mapping,
Dimitar
os-emmer (2024-03-10 13:59:44+00:00): Thanks for the response!
rainerU (2023-11-13 15:26:38+00:00): Hallo welzheimerwald,

auf welcher Quellen basieren die Stadtteilgrenzen, die du mit diesem Changeset hinzugefügt hast. In dem als "source" angegebenen Dokument habe ich nichts dazu gefunden.

Rainer
welzheimerwald (2023-11-13 19:53:25+00:00): In der Hauptsatzung kannst du diese Grenzen lang suchen. Hier werden die Stadtteile mit Selbstverwaltungsstatus festgelegt. Die groben Grenzverläufe habe ich einem ausgehängten Stadtplan entnommen und sie mit einem (leider sehr holzhammermäßig zusammengezimmerten) Shape-Datensatz abgeglichen (Ein lizenzfreier von hub.arcgis.com oder so - will mich da jetzt nicht festnageln müssen).
Đuro Jiří (2023-11-13 20:44:40+00:00): Meglio utilizzare tag school
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Tag:amenity%3Dschool
Patrickov (2023-11-13 00:26:25+00:00): V každom súbore zmien upravte maximálne jednu krajinu.

(English:  Please only edit at most a country in each changeset)
MxxCon (2023-11-15 00:32:05+00:00): Hello.
Is "East Rockaway Inlet at Reynolds Channel" the official name of this feature or something that you came up with?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143950230
eggie (2023-11-13 10:30:28+00:00): Dag scilaneous  Je vraagt feedback. Je was een heel stuk op weg, maar je kreeg hier foutmeldingen. Anders zag je paden op de grondomtrek. 
Die paden in het midden heb ik omgezet naar landuse=grass
Dat zijn de inners van de outer leisure=track. 
De landuse=recreation_ground (Dat is het niet in de zin van) is nu een leisure=track. De rest was oke. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-11-13 10:33:28+00:00): Mijn edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=143963984

Op de outer hoorde geen highway=path
De tagging leisure=track zit in de relatie.
Op de fysieke outer dus nooit een tag.. op de inners wel bij een mp relatie.
scilaneous (2023-11-14 21:56:39+00:00): Duidelijk. Dank voor de uitleg.
ftrebien (2023-11-14 23:37:17+00:00): I don't know. According to Wikipedia, which copied text from the Australian Antarctic Program, what happens is that operations are transferred from the Davies Sea Ice Runway to Plough Island and the Davis Plateau Skiway during the summer. It may be that there is a ski way on Plough Island as a feature that is operational for a time every few years with some regularity. I just don't know where it was installed most recently, all the available images I found don't have enough definition.
ftrebien (2023-11-15 18:14:23+00:00): I found a recent AADC map showing the ski way, so I restored it and moved it to the correct location.
limes11 (2023-11-13 18:52:51+00:00): Hi, 

so ist das doppelt gemoppelt. name, landuse etc. gehören einmal an die Relation, die einzelnen Flächen kriegen dann keine Tags. Und ruhig alle in eine Relation, nicht in verschiedene. Eine nennenswerte Historie der Objekte existiert nicht.

VG
gurglypipe (2023-11-13 00:07:33+00:00): This edit seems to add a second post box by Douglas Avenue. Are there really two postboxes, one either side of Douglas Avenue?
gurglypipe (2023-11-14 10:44:11+00:00): It seems really unlikely there are two within 100m of each other, so I’ve removed the duplicate in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144004848. Let me know if that’s not correct.
Falsernet (2023-11-14 12:50:12+00:00): I definitely didn't create one new myself. Seems like iD editor may have been up to something strange - I can't think how else that could've happened.
SpinOff (2023-11-13 17:45:45+00:00): Adres Leśmierz 32 już nie istnieje czy usunąłeś go przypadkiem?
Allison P (2023-11-13 22:38:49+00:00): What is it with you and abandoned places? These lacked highway tags for a reason.
Patrickov (2023-11-13 00:25:46+00:00): Please only edit at most a country in each changeset.
Peaceandcarrots (2023-11-13 00:47:26+00:00): Apologies, this is due to a bulk upload of changes from OSMand. Is there a way to split the changeset in retrospect?
silversurfer83 (2023-11-13 07:04:25+00:00): Nope.
Huge bboxes are mostly a nuisance to people who engange in QA work in their respective area (like me) since they show up in the feed without changing anything close by and are hard to review using a standard set of tools.

Anyways: safe travels :)
and maybe try to upload before boarding the plane
Metzor (2023-11-13 07:21:12+00:00): Yes, this is possible:
1. Go to plugin settings
2. Cluck the OSM editing plugin
3. Go to OSM changes
4. Click on the three points, then you can upload each change separately
NorthCrab_upload (2023-11-12 23:30:30+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/396141498

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
WieKo68 (2024-06-11 04:32:33+00:00): poprawiono
MxxCon (2023-11-15 00:35:48+00:00): Hello.
When mapping sidewalks along straight streets, please make as such, without extra intermediate nodes. Such extra nodes needlessly bloat the database and make your mapping look janky.
Also please make sure that you map sidewalks along each street as individual ways, not a single loop around the whole block.
And finally, when mapping intersections, please make sure to accurately tag what kind of crosswalk that is as both a way and a node that intersects the street itself.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask. 👍
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143951597
CasGroenigen (2023-11-15 21:54:57+00:00): Thanks for the feedback!
Xvtn (2023-11-13 23:16:18+00:00): Hmm, at first I disagreed with your changes here, but after reading the wiki page I guess place=village is technically correct since AFAIK Lewiston and Franklin do have "few facilities available".
kwiatek_123 (2023-11-15 18:23:18+00:00): Czemu usunąłeś tag building z budynku? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30215539/
kwiatek_123 (2023-11-15 18:24:33+00:00): Aaa nie usunąłeś tylko, że wyburzony.
kwiatek_123 (2023-11-15 18:25:27+00:00): No ale teraz adres został na zburzonym budynku. Trzeba poprawić
gscholz (2023-11-13 10:23:38+00:00): Hi Miroslav,
this changeset has destroyed the boundary relations of "CHKO Šumava" and "Národní park Šumava":

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=143952103

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2022072#map=10/48.9406/13.6121

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2029367

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Fizzie-DWG (2023-11-20 06:39:00+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144232898
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-07-30 10:02:49+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11345474835/history has shop = general_contractor that was added in this edit
shop=general_contractor ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop or https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Tag_descriptions_for_key_%22shop%22 fitting? Maybe new value needs to be invented? Maybe this data is wrong and there is no shop here? Maybe it is not a shop but something else?
gormur (2025-01-06 02:16:12+00:00): No need to add foot=yes on highway=pedestrian as it is implied. bicycle=yes is also implied in Norway, at least
ovruni (2023-11-13 01:37:26+00:00): Hola, he notado que en varios de sus conjuntos de cambios ha estado utilizando imágenes de Mapbox Satellite, las cuales son mas antiguas que las de Bing, donde en varias de las áreas existen nuevos edificios construidos. En este conjunto de cambios además se han eliminado varios de estos edificios, por lo que he revertido el conjunto de cambios. Si tiene alguna duda sobre el mapeo de OSM en Perú tenemos el canal de telegram de la comunidad https://t.me/osmPe
Saludos
ovruni (2023-11-13 01:39:28+00:00): Le dejo aquí un enlace sobre como puede acceder a la imagen de Bing en el editor iD https://learnosm.org/es/beginner/id-editor/#configuraci%C3%B3n-de-la-capa-de-fondo
Fizzie-DWG (2023-11-13 02:44:31+00:00): Sorry, but no, copy-pasting buildings is NOT the correct way to map in OSM! Please fix the outlines & position sof the buildings that you have added this way. Graeme Fitzpatrick, 
OSMF Data Working Group
Fizzie-DWG (2023-11-20 06:39:01+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144232898
WoodWoseWulf (2023-11-18 07:42:50+00:00): Hi Chen-Yu Chiang,

You added https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1223107954 as a park, but it looks like it's a feature in a private backyard. Do you have more info about what it is?
emersonveenstra (2023-11-14 12:12:38+00:00): Hey there,

Would you mind going back and double checking the tags on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1175208129? I think it's supposed to be part of the path, but i'm not 100% sure
treestryder (2023-11-15 01:49:41+00:00): Thank you. Fixed.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144032484
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-11-13 14:34:41+00:00): Voce adicionou um ponto referente a Drogasil, mas ela ja esta desenhada como area. Então ficou uma duplicação.
WoodWoseWulf (2023-11-18 07:54:57+00:00): Hi Mfun,

I'm not sure what you're trying to do here. You changed a park area in the middle of UoA Fort Smith into a duplicate of the university... doesn't seem like much of a repair?
user_5359 (2023-11-16 15:01:56+00:00): Welcome to oSM (again)! I revert your changeset.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-11-13 06:07:44+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143956623
user_5359 (2023-11-16 15:00:33+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I revert your change set, because you didn't useful information.
i2004 (2023-11-13 12:22:45+00:00): te extendi el ramal colegiales hacia san isidro
Tayvick (2023-11-13 03:44:31+00:00): Also updated the wetland on Goat Island*
Fizzie-DWG (2023-11-13 06:07:55+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15373
arjunaraoc (2024-01-07 15:40:57+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143955178
shahenda_ahmed (2023-11-14 08:00:17+00:00): Hello lidodado;
I noticed you reverted my edit and made these links operational
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/893393867
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/893393864
Could you please provide me with the source that you used to open these links?
Regards
shahenda_ahmed
mkopinsky (2023-11-13 20:26:39+00:00): Why did you delete a bunch of traffic signals?

Because there's so much going on in this changeset it's hard to know whether there's anything else concerning.
snake21 (2023-11-14 03:32:05+00:00): Combination of incorrectly marked signals that are actually stop signs + changing signals to be marked at the center of the intersection as opposed to individually coming from every direction into the intersection. will keep changesets smaller going forward!
CRCulver (2024-02-08 20:17:29+00:00): Late to this changeset, but concerned about this statement: "changing signals to be marked at the center of the intersection as opposed to individually coming from every direction into the intersection". This is completely backwards from modern OSM tagging processes: for complex intersections, multiple traffic_signals nodes that are directionally tagged are preferred. Helps routing engines correctly calculate penalties for traffic signals, and lets voice guidance warn about correct distance to upcoming traffic-signal stop positions.
StC (2024-01-18 16:42:35+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changement a créé des interruptions dans le réseau pédestre dans la zone de Gève, et par ailleurs le nouveau tracé des routes et pistes forestières semble moins correspondre aux photos aériennes qu'auparavant. Est-il possible de rétablir cela pour que la géométrie fonctionne autant en été qu'en hiver ?

Merci par avance

St.
RobMazc (2024-01-18 18:05:03+00:00): Bonjour,

Merci du retour !

On a trouvé quelques décalages entre les photos aériennes et vérifications avec GPS au sol, mais on continue d'ajuster progressivement. On travaille en lien étroit avec les différentes parties pour assurer que les traces sont conformes.

Sur la partie pédestre, est-ce qu'il y a une route/relation en particulier qui semblait fausse ? Heureux de faire les ajustements nécessaires.