piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Gregory Peony (2025-12-15 05:29:32+00:00): Hi, you deleted a place POI, I restored it, only delete features if they do not exist.

Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175847491
Gregory Peony (2025-12-15 05:42:49+00:00): also don't fret about deleting the POI; I restored it in https://osmcha.org/changesets/175943947
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175847491
Langlaeufer (2025-12-13 10:50:52+00:00): Wenn die Fußweg wie hier separat erfasst sind muss es sidewalk:<side>=separate heißen
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175847995
NeisBot (2025-12-12 14:26:11+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your changesets and noticed that the cumulative count of your recent edits (3 changesets) shows that 304 of your last 329 changes were deletions. This is quite an unusual proportion, so I wanted to check with you.

Could you please confirm whether these deletions were intentional or if they may have occurred by mistake?

#DeletionsCheck #Cumulative
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?uid=22901268
Thierry1030 (2026-01-02 12:28:18+00:00): bedoeling van is_sidepath tag? :-)
L'imaginaire (2026-01-03 07:43:04+00:00): Ik kopieer even uit de Matrix chat:

FYI: At Westtoer, we have been mapping a lot of highway=cycleway in West Flanders with is_sidepath=yes|no
The tag is still a proposal in the wiki, but we wanted to use it to identify cycleways that are truly away from roads. We will use this information on our printed maps for the new cycle node network (more information: https://www.visitwestvlaanderen.be/nl/visitwestvlaanderen-node/fietsen/vernieuwingen-aan-het-fietsnetwerk-van-west-vlaanderen)
If you have any questions or suggestions, shoot!

Zie ook https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:is_sidepath
Thierry1030 (2026-01-03 08:02:49+00:00): ok! 
"fietsweg in eigen bedding" ...:-)
Gregory Peony (2025-12-20 19:32:02+00:00): A task boundary is just a conceptual boundary; if a feature like one of the buildings you mapped here crosses it just map the entire building. If it's a larger feature like a landuse are or highway map just beyond the task boundary so that others can continue mapping them.
Stretch Longfellow (2026-02-10 22:18:42+00:00): I think you may have jumped the gun a bit here; this approval was just announced by NDOT (it's been submitted and rejected for years) and isn't going to be implemented until spring. https://dot.nebraska.gov/media/5yxdus45/20260210-d8-hwyrenumbering.pdf
SD Mapman (2026-02-11 21:49:57+00:00): Is there a way to save the new configuration (currently in OSM) in a JOSM layer (or something), then revert this changeset, then when signage catches up put the saved layer back? Just trying to work smarter, not harder here.
Stretch Longfellow (2026-02-13 18:06:24+00:00): That's above my technical level. Best I've got is future_ref=
SD Mapman (2026-02-17 15:40:30+00:00): I'll clean it up, just as long as someone remembers to change it back this summer
Gregory Peony (2025-12-15 05:46:47+00:00): Hi, the footprints you added here are generally valid and appropriately shaped, however they could be more accurate.

Thank you for your contribution! 

When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom out to obtain the orientation and shape, then zoom in so that you can accurately draw the footprint. Exclude shadows and yards when tracing the footprint. Keep in mind that you are looking at the [roofs of buildings](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape#Roof_shape), but mapping their footprints. Depending on how the scene is lit, pitched roofs may have light and dark sections that belong to one building. Generally pitched roofs overhang the walls of a building, so a footprint slightly smaller than the roof is accurate. You can scale selected features in ID with `shift+(-/+)`, or JOSM with `ctrl.+alt+Lclick & drag`.  Take care to make contributions that others can build upon.

Keep on mapping!
Gregory Peony (2025-12-20 19:32:10+00:00): A task boundary is just a conceptual boundary; if a feature like one of the buildings you mapped here crosses it just map the entire building. If it's a larger feature like a landuse are or highway map just beyond the task boundary so that others can continue mapping them.
Gregory Peony (2025-12-18 20:14:45+00:00): Hi, it looks like you dragged a node of a highway creating overlapps. If you make an accidental action press the undo button or use `ctrl+z`. I undid the change here.

Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
literan (2025-12-13 11:28:28+00:00): сейчас со всех карт снесу name, ибо это название улицы, а не имя собственное карты
Dimitar155 (2025-12-12 18:16:05+00:00): Their website shows "Метростанция Витоша" for this location so it might've been moved there?

https://webportal.sofiatraffic.bg/bg/contacts
rhhs (2025-12-12 18:58:16+00:00): It's certainly not where it used to be, and it's an open space so I think I would have noticed if it had moved somewhere close by. Will look for it next time I'm there
Frans S (2025-12-13 09:30:56+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
A remark about your mapping style.
You ignore the rooflines and just map a rectangular over one or more objects.
Each buildings must be mapped accurately by following the rooflines.
Do not cluster buildings as well.
Please keep that in mind in future mappings.
Check the mapping lessons please.
Best regards
Frans S (2025-12-13 09:36:00+00:00): check this webpage to see the adjustments I had to make.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=175876329
Best regards
ilias_ (2025-12-12 20:03:17+00:00): Did you just change all of Berrechid from residential to a farm?
user_5359 (2025-12-12 17:28:30+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Sorry, but business entries without addresses are not in line with OSM. Please add the street and house number, or we will have to mark this as SPAM.
I have now reverted your changes.
NeisBot (2025-12-12 20:15:15+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 19 potential crossings.

Problematic elements (top 3 by category):
https://osm.org/way/605642290 v2 | 7 crossings
https://osm.org/way/605680696 v2 | 3 crossings
https://osm.org/way/605621676 v5 | 3 crossings

Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/5743782958 v4

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=175849776
NeisRevert (2025-12-13 16:32:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/175890317
where the comment is: "Revert of unintended geometry change"
Gregory Peony (2025-12-15 07:40:02+00:00): Thank you for your contribution! 

Each footprint should represent a building. Please watch [this video about imagery interpretation](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJ-vUwtS3A8). Sometimes buildings may appear to share a common wall, but this is sometimes an illusion; only map them with shared nodes if you have reason to believe that they really do touch.

Keep on mapping!

Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175849839
NeisBot (2025-12-12 20:15:18+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 7 potential crossings.

Problematic elements (top 3 by category):
https://osm.org/way/608378436 v8 | 4 crossings
https://osm.org/way/608938225 v1 | 3 crossings

Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/5763919410 v3

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=175850012
NeisRevert (2025-12-13 16:31:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/175890300
where the comment is: "Revert of unintended geometry change"
Vinber-Pro (2025-12-17 14:47:34+00:00): Bonjour,
c'est plutôt l'attribut que le logo :)

est-ce qu'il utilise tout le batiment ?

bonne carto Marticorena
bartgron (2025-12-12 16:09:51+00:00): Zestaw zmian wycofany:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175853524
Poprzednio było prawidłowo (sam dopasowywałem kategorie dróg na podstawie map objazdów). Pozdrawiam
bartgron (2025-12-12 16:03:46+00:00): Zestaw zmian wycofany:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175853327
Poprzedni status był prawidłowy. Pozdrawiam
bartgron (2025-12-12 16:02:23+00:00): Zestaw zmian wycofany:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175853294
Poprzedni status był prawidłowy. Pozdrawiam
bartgron (2025-12-12 16:01:20+00:00): Zestaw zmian wycofany:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175853257
Poprzedni status był prawidłowy. Pozdrawiam
Pascal43 (2025-12-15 14:09:30+00:00): This change is incorrect, it should be spelt Alderholt as it was before.
ilias_ (2025-12-12 20:06:37+00:00): highway=trunk est pour les voies express. Cette route est loin d'être une voie express, c'est une route natinale normale.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175861169
redrace (2025-12-12 17:05:01+00:00): HUHU
Du hast hier:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1458093408
"buildinglevels=5" eingetragen. Macht aber eigentlich keinen Sinn, weil Du ja alle "buildingparts" mit Höhen versehen hast. 
Schöne Grüße Meik
DemolitionAlley (2025-12-13 15:58:59+00:00): Hallo Meik, tatsächlich ist das lt. Wiki so richtig, für das Gesamtgebäude wird der größte Wert (Höhe, Stockwerke,etc.) eingetragen, für die einzelnen Gebäudeteile dann der jeweils gültige Wert. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:part#How_to_use

Grüße
redrace (2025-12-13 21:16:07+00:00): Ja das zeigt auch wieder wie unsinnig manches ist! 😂👍
MassCartog (2025-12-12 19:11:42+00:00): Hi welcome to OSM, thanks for adding data into the system. Could I ask why you removed the other two buildings though?
ilias_ (2025-12-12 20:07:51+00:00): Encore une fois cette route n'est pas une voie express.
ilias_ (2025-12-12 20:08:37+00:00): Merci d'utiliser une meilleure description que "good".
Taya_S (2025-12-12 20:00:08+00:00): Reverted SEO vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175860978
eggie (2025-12-13 11:38:43+00:00): Dag ov  Wat bedoel je met []x   in je commentaar?

Wanneer je iets aan OV routes aanpast kun je dat het beste doen met editor JOSM . Editor iD kan niet met routerelaties omgaan en maakt ze vaak stuk.
Hoort op een route ook de ref? 

MVG
eggie
ov_079 (2025-12-16 10:21:24+00:00): Hey eggie, aan de relatie zelf is de facto niks aangepast, enkel aan de tagging (brand,  operator, etc) - daarom leek mij dit te kunnen met de standaard editor (verder bewerk ik om de genoemde reden geen ov). Omdat ik wat zaken was vergeten werd het een serie van wijzigingen helaas, waarvan deze per abuis geen juiste omschrijving heeft gekregen.
eggie (2025-12-16 10:25:14+00:00): Oke.. duidelijk..
Groet..
eggie
felipeeugenio (2025-12-12 18:02:37+00:00): Hola. Supongo que interpreté bien lo que intentaste hacer con esos muros. Agregué portones, dosifiqué los nodos y borré un nombre descriptiv que había (Sitio Animal care).

en todo caso distintos landuses pueden coexistir. no hay para que hacer figuras tan rebuscadas para que no se topen. Pero lo dejé igual.

eso si borraste una rotonda completa. La repuse.

Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175853868
tmr21 (2025-12-12 19:12:12+00:00): La rotonda fue un error. Entre tantos cambios, se me fue borrar el descitp. del sitio
aTarom (2025-12-12 18:46:55+00:00): Hola, lo que en España se conoce como Bar, se etiqueta como
"pub"
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dpub
lo modifico, también añado el formato adecuado al mobile "+34..."
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13372290786/history
Saludos
jhaluska80 (2025-12-12 19:04:07+00:00): I was planning to unsplit this way in the next few hours.  I may need you to double check the turn restrictions afterwards.
Lukas615 (2026-01-18 16:20:02+00:00): Hallo,
du hast als Quelle den Trassenfinder der DB angegeben. Bitte beachte, dass wir die Daten aus dem Trassenfinder der DB nicht als Quelle benutzen dürfen, da diese nicht für OpenStreetMap mit der entsprechenden Lizenz freigegeben sind.
Gruß
Lukas
kiwilecker (2026-01-18 19:17:47+00:00): Hallo Lukas,
danke für den Hinweis, das wussste ich nicht!
mueschel (2026-06-09 08:34:30+00:00): Hi,
I found the key "osmid" on several schools - was this added by mistake or is this some relevant reference number?

e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13372348822
Beinardus (2025-12-13 09:52:00+00:00): Hi Forresthodl, Is there a reason why you located the business on a parking lot? Placing a POI (Point of Interest) on a parking lot is not allowed in OSM. Why not use the address that is mentioned on their website?

595 Charstate Dr.
Campbell River, BC
V9W 6M1

I can fix it if you like.
Comino (2025-12-13 09:05:56+00:00): Hi,

In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes".

Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag !
Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead.

For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Merchants#tagging-guidance
and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bitcoin

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Comino
https://btcmap.org/tagger/6794624
silversurfer83 (2025-12-12 18:50:38+00:00): Hola,

could you please provide your source for this rather expansive addition of POI all over Europe?

cheers
silversurfer83 (2025-12-12 18:50:41+00:00): Hola,

could you please provide your source for this rather expansive addition of POI all over Europe?

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175856199
Aethonatic (2025-12-12 19:20:13+00:00): A source would be nice. A majority of nodes added are in Spain and Portugal, but there's overspill in France, Italy, Montenegro and Poland.
Emilio Eugenio (2025-12-12 19:35:41+00:00): Buenas noches:

Cuando preparo rutas para hacer con mi autocaravana, voy marcando en el mapa los puntos de interés que investigo previamente a la edición de la guía que me servirá para el viaje. 

Hay puntos de interés que no están en el mapa y busco su ubicación en páginas web de turismo de la zona y lo añado al mapa de la aplicación MapsMe que llevo en mi tablet para todos los viajes.

También añado lugares estando en las ciudades que visito.

Llevo muchos años usando la aplicación MapsMe y com referencia, comentaré que tengo marcados 20.353 ciudades y puntos de interés que he ido usando en mis viajes efectuados y los pendientes de ejecutar. 

No entiendo por qué salen ahora tantos puntos pendientes de actualizar.

Saludos cordiales 

Emilio De Arriba Escolá 
Zaragoza (España)
limes11 (2025-12-13 16:49:17+00:00): Hello, 

the data looks legitimate but to add all these POIs in such a changeset makes it very hard to review.

Just checking a few objects I found two duplicates

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13372401019

and

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13372388620

Overall, the positions of the POIs look often imprecise. 

POIs like

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13372400824

(independently of whether this really is an official caravan site or not) should not have such a descriptive name.

This should probably be reverted for its poor quality. Or someone puts the effort and reviews the whole thing.

Best
Emilio Eugenio (2025-12-13 18:01:28+00:00): Muchas gracias por vuestro interés. 

Debo manifestar, que procuro ser preciso en la colocación de los puntos de interés, así que no debería haber problema con las posiciones. De todos modos, he observado, cada vez que se actualizan los mapas, las posiciones se mueven.

Respecto a las zonas para autocaravanas, procuro distinguir lo que es un Parking de lo que es un Área porque está última es más completa de Servicios. Poner solo Zona de Caravanas es muy impreciso.

Saludos cordiales. 

Emilio De Arriba Escolá 
Zaragoza (España)
Rainero (2025-12-14 09:55:18+00:00): Hallo mauric3,

danke dass du mithelfen willst die Daten bei Openstreetmap zu verbessern. Bitte beachte dabei aber, dass Google Maps keine zulässige Quelle für Openstreetmap ist. Googles Nutzungsbedingungen untersagen die Übernahme in andere Datenbanken. Daher muss ich deinen Eintrag revertieren.

Viele weitergehende Informationen über Openstreetmap findest du auf https://openstreetmap.de

Viele Grüße,
Rainer
Mammi71 (2026-01-15 11:41:05+00:00): Hallo Protoxenus, warum hast Du den Gebäudeumriss in Zingst Am Bahndamm 28 so stark verkleinert?
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/161177018

Die westliche Gebäudekante liegt jetzt auf dem Dachfirst. 
Kannst Du das bitte wieder revertieren? Danke
Protoxenus (2026-01-15 11:48:18+00:00): Habe es geändert. Sah auf dem Luftbild auf Grund des Schattenwurfs so aus, als wenn das Gebäude kleiner wäre.
Danke für den Hinweis.
Mammi71 (2026-01-17 09:50:13+00:00): Jepp, der Schatten ist ungünstig. Und die große Birke neben dem Haus verwischt und verbirgt die westl. Dachkante. Im Gegensatz zu einigen umliegenden Häusern ist dieses seit über 50 Jahren unverändert, abgesehen von dem östl. Anbau. Und die Birke ist praktisch mit mir aufgewachsen, nur etwas schneller und größer. Danke für die Korrektur.
NeisBot (2025-12-12 20:28:59+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 13 potential crossings.

Problematic elements (top 3 by category):
https://osm.org/way/439272639 v9 | 3 crossings
https://osm.org/way/439132305 v5 | 6 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=175857238
silversurfer83 (2025-12-12 21:45:14+00:00): Hi :)

ein paar Anmerkungen: Abschnitte, von denen nicht mehr zu sehen ist gehören ausschließlich in die OpenHistoricalMap und haben nichts mehr in OSM verloren.

Abschnitte, wo klar erkennbar Bahntrassenreste vorhanden sind, die aber nicht mehr nutzbar sind, sollten "razed" sein, nicht "abandoned".

Und bitte achte darauf, dass du keine Objekte mit Grenzen verbindest (blaue Linien mit weißen Strichen und Punkten).

Wärst du so gut und räumst selbst auf?

Bei Fragen immer raus damit
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175857382
JakobD029 (2025-12-12 21:57:21+00:00): Denk für die Nachricht.
Die gesamte Trasse ist ja noch im Originalzustand vorhanden. Bis auf die Gleise selbst.
Zudem wird ja ein Wiederaufbau des Ganzen geplant. Würde es dann nicht auch schon wieder in eine noch Andere Kategorie passen?
silversurfer83 (2025-12-12 22:36:33+00:00): Ah. Tut mir leid, mein Fehler.

Mir ging es primär um einen Abschnitt im Südwesten dieser Änderung, bei dem auf dem Luftbild keine Reste erkennbar sind. Aber ich sehe gerade, dass diese nur von dir angepasst, aber nicht erstellt wurden.

So lange es nur Planungen sind, sollte alles so erfasst sein, wie es aktuell vor Ort ist. Ein Großteil ist also abandoned. Wenn es wirklich zu einer Reaktivierung kommen sollte (was ich hoffe), dann wird nach Abschluss der Arbeiten alles auf "normale" Eisenbahnwerte gesetzt.

Da hier kein Neubau stattfindet ist auch kein "construction" nötig.

Happy mapping
NorthCrab_upload (2025-12-12 22:52:43+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2823664337
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/394169569

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2025-12-12 23:22:56+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2823664337
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/394169569

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
silversurfer83 (2025-12-12 18:45:57+00:00): Hi quincylvania,

our wiki is where most things are documented and the page on aerodromes does not once mention "area=yes" since it is implied. "aeroway=aerodrome" is to be tagged to nodes or preferably closed ways (or MPs). Thus it is not neccessary to add "area=yes".

It isn't really "wrong" but please refrain from changing other aerodromes, too. Thank you.

happy mapping

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:aeroway%3Daerodrome
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175858098
quincylvania (2025-12-12 19:23:59+00:00): Hi silversurfer83, thanks for your review. 

I see your point of view, but I'd note that the wiki isn't authoritative and that adding this type of clarity reduces the burden for apps to use OSM data.

This is because there is no native area type in OSM, so currently each app needs to maintain a list of what tags imply area geometry on closed ways. Ideally this could be done by looking only at top-level keys without caring about the values, but `aeroway` is different than keys like `highway` or `building` in that it's commonly used for both lines and areas, not merely one or the other. Adding `area=yes` to closed `aeroway` areas resolves this ambiguity without affecting existing apps whatsoever.
QuiLe (2025-12-12 18:55:21+00:00): Welcome to OSM and thank you for your contributions! When adding street names please make sure to expand abbreviations. Example, Blvd should be expanded to Boulevard. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Abbreviations
HellMap (2025-12-13 12:03:08+00:00): Please don't change landuse=grass into natural=grassland. Grassland is wild grass normally outside urban environments that isn't regularly mowed and maintained. There is almost never grassland like that in places like this. Almost all grassy areas here are maintained and part of urban properties.
clambake92115 (2026-01-26 19:13:20+00:00): Can you reconsider this change? Seems to me the consensus is to not map roads as dual carriageways if there is no physical barrier: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/tram-tracks-and-bus-lanes/90864/6