piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
PèreForez (2023-07-30 20:46:57+00:00): Bonsoir jcr83, Je suis content de voir une réaction car jusqu'à présent je ne sais à qui et comment m'adresser à quelqu'un concerné par une de mes modifications (en dhors du problème strict des monuments aux morts !!
Dans le cas présent c'est ma difficulté à modifier un élément existant (non conforme à la réalité) qui me fait faire des erreurs : ici le dessin de la place ne correspondait pas à son emprise réelle avec le monument et je n'ai pas su simplement le reformer correctement puisque apparemment je l'ai transformé en un autre objet. Ce travail de reprise d'un objet est moins simple que prévu, et des éclaircissements sur la démarche me seront bien utiles.
Cordialement PèreForez
jcr83 (2023-07-31 09:06:26+00:00): Bonjour,
J'ai corrigé le problème, merci de bien vérifier si c'est conforme à ce que vous vouliez. Ne sachant pas ce que vous avez fait, et n'utilisant pas iD, je ne peux pas vraiment vous aider. Normalement, il suffisait de déplacer des noeuds ou d'en ajouter/supprimer.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-25 15:10:41+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2271993841/history has rooms = 0 that was added in this edit
What was meant by this? That this object has no rooms? Seems surprising here
Jan-Hinrich Fessel (2025-11-27 09:43:32+00:00): Actually that is supposed to clarify this is not a hotel/restaurant anymore, so no rooms available at the time of recording
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-27 18:46:33+00:00): I think that removing tourism=hotel achieves this already, rooms= can be also simply removed
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-20 13:36:09+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11051887460 - have you tried to map a cafe here?
YomanNH (2023-07-18 08:47:42+00:00): Zweryfikowałeś, że wszystkie te budynki istnieją, czy znowu dodajesz "masowo"?
Barroszt (2023-07-26 21:59:00+00:00): To nie jest import, wszystkie budynki sprawdziłem ze zdjęć satelitarnych, dla planowanych jest tag proposed, dla w budowie construction.
YomanNH (2023-07-28 06:31:06+00:00): To dobrze. Chociaż może się zdarzyć, że na https://budynki.openstreetmap.org.pl jest budynek, którego w rzeczywistości już nie ma, bo np. został wyburzony. Ale już się nie czepiam.
eggie (2023-07-18 05:36:45+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback...  Goed om zaken actueel te houden. Let er wel op dat je alle adresgegevens laat staat.. Dus ook de BAG (Kadaster) info. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-07-18 05:39:29+00:00): BAG data hersteld
rskedgell (2023-07-18 06:30:39+00:00): If you want to explicitly specify a footpath, highway=footway already does that.

It doesn't do any harm to add the extra access tags, but you don't generally need to add horse=no or bicycle=no, or any of the other irrelevant options which the iD editor presents for footways (I wish it didn't). It can be worth adding bicycle=no where it is explicitly signed, but still isn't absolutely necessary. 

The OSM wiki lists the UK's default access restrictions for different highway types here.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#United_Kingdom
Matthieu Brucher (2023-07-18 09:11:56+00:00): Indeed, thanks for the pointer!
user_5359 (2023-07-18 10:00:50+00:00): Hello! Please take a look on https://www.osm.org/node/11051878885. What is the mean of the tag e168 = village?
miluethi (2023-07-19 10:46:46+00:00): Hi, sorry, this is a mistake. I'll correct it.
ForestFurnace (2023-07-17 23:10:13+00:00): Sources: DCNR Parker Dam Map: http://elibrary.dcnr.pa.gov/GetDocument?docId=1753200&DocName=PADA_ParkMap.pdf and
Strava Global Heatmap
Alex_Mapper (2023-07-18 14:35:30+00:00): Bom dia, qual a fonte da informação?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138641832
MiguelMarques125 (2023-07-19 19:56:33+00:00): Moro quase ao lado..
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138641832
topolusitania (2023-07-19 21:06:10+00:00): Olá
Nesta edição bastava teres colocado o nome no edifício já classificado como café. Assim aparece o símbolo de café duplicado no mapa. Por favor verifica os comentários deixados em anteriores edições tuas. Parece que estás involuntariamente a apagar edições de outros mapeadores. Ver aqui:
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussions?c=Portugal#7/37.614/-8.135
MiguelMarques125 (2023-07-19 22:41:40+00:00): nao consegui perceber que edicoes dizes que eu apaguei de outros users, mas se apaguei  foi voluntariamente pois moro nesta zona e conheco super bem esta zona
Rui CT7ALW (2023-07-20 08:25:19+00:00): Por exemplo (tudo o que aparece a vermelho foi apagado por ti):

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=138737857

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=138642023

Aqui apagaste metade da Quinta da Migalha:

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=138643742

Aqui apagaste metade do bairro:

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=138644446

Ou aqui: 

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=138645434

Ou por exemplo apagas linhas e voltas a desenhar ao lado:

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=138642203

https://overpass-api.de/acha

Nós compreendemos se isto for acidental por falta de conhecimento de como funcionar com o editor. Apenas queremos confirmar o que se passa aqui.
topolusitania (2023-07-20 09:42:06+00:00): Olá
Há um principio fundamental no OSM: Apagar edições de outros mapeadores deve ser evitado ao máximo. Se achamos que algo está errado, corrigimos. Não apagamos e fazemos de novo.
Só desta maneira respeitamos o trabalho de todos que num dado momento contribuíram para o mapa. Só corrigindo é que preservamos a memória das edições antigas.
MiguelMarques125 (2023-07-21 00:52:48+00:00): Boas, peço desculpa se editei da forma errada, irei entao passar a editar em vez de apagar o que ja esta criado, mas entao se assim é, porque apagaram a rua que eu criei? sendo que ela existe ?
Rui CT7ALW (2023-07-21 09:05:21+00:00): Não se o que te referes que apagamos ao certo, mas aqui os colegas tiveram de usar ferramentas de reversão para reverter os teus changesets em que apagaste metade do Barreiro. Isso pode ter levado à reversão das modificações positivas que terás feito.

Mais uma vez, o nosso problema maior é porque é que apagaste *tanta* coisa? Foi sem querer? Não apagaste só as linhas que foste refazer, apagaste áreas inteiras. 

Mais uma vez, convidamos-te a juntares-te ao grupo OSM Portugal no telegram, para que possamos falar mais facilmente, e percebermos o que se passa aqui, e podermos ajudar-te a seres um editor do mapa melhor. Todos os editores do mapa são bem vindos, desde que o contributo seja positivo, e queremos ajudar-te a que assim seja. Fica o link: https://t.me/OSMPortugal
jmrfrosa (2023-07-21 11:20:04+00:00): Olá Miguel,

Tive de reverter algumas edições tuas onde apagavas zonas válidas, tal como o Rui mencionou. Desculpa se ao fazer isso, também eliminei alguma edição válida – mas pareceu-me que a rua em questão já estava no mapa, apenas com um desenho diferente.

Nas tuas últimas alterações voltas a apagar caminhos e zonas existentes, que provavelmente terão de ser recuperadas também. Nota que o nosso objectivo aqui é construir o mapa mais detalhado possível, pelo que, mesmo que aches que uma determinada estrada/ribeiro/etc já não existe, temos formas de etiquetar isso sem ter que apagar: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Nonexistent_features

Assim, a informação é mantida e pode ser verificada no futuro por outros utilizadores.

Não leves a mal estas advertências: tal como o Rui disse acima, estamos completamente abertos a ajudar com qualquer dúvida que tenhas acerca de contribuir da melhor forma possível que também seja compatível com o trabalho de outros utilizadores. Especialmente numa zona como a Vila Chã, onde ainda há muita coisa em falta. Podes falar directamente connosco aqui: https://t.me/OSMPortugal
Rui CT7ALW (2023-07-18 10:05:13+00:00): Olá Miguel,

Changesets como este tem apagado uma série de caminhos válidos. Isto tem sido feito por acidente?

Convido-te ainda a juntares-te ao nosso canal de Telegram, onde é possível ter uma conversa mais ágil: https://t.me/OSMPortugal
Mevess (2023-07-21 21:49:16+00:00): Bonjour et merci d'avoir ajouté ces piscines, très utile pour les pompiers notamment !
Mais il est fortement déconseillé de nommer objets qui n'ont pas de nom propre, leisure=swimming_pool suffit à OSM pour comprendre que c'est une piscine.
Si jamais, voici les 10 cOSMandements (https://www.openstreetmap.fr/les-10-cosmandements/)
Bonne carto ! 
Neven
Fizzie-DWG (2023-12-19 21:40:06+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145307947
julcnx (2023-07-18 01:51:06+00:00): Thank you for your valuable contributions! Just a quick reminder to ensure that the "tracktype" tag aligns with the official visual guide. Keep up the fantastic work!   https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tracktype
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138643015
wwjd2022 (2023-07-18 02:08:14+00:00): Thank you, Julcnx, for looking after Chiang Mai mapping! It is amazing  how many tracks, also small ones, are already mapped!
I thought grade4 was correct for this one. If not, please feel free to correct it!
Keep up the fantastic work, too!
ivanbranco (2023-07-18 08:45:50+00:00): Ciao Valier89, benvenuto su OSM e grazie per gli edit

ricordati solo di non duplicare il nome del fiume sulla sua rappresentazione come area (natural=water+water=river). Come dice la wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:water=river): "All tags of the river (like name=* and other supplemental tags) should go to this center line tagged as waterway=river."

buon mapping
impiaaa (2023-07-18 18:10:35+00:00): You can see the history of an object by following its link and clicking "view history." In this case https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/810015282/history we can see that it was from an import https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/85987477 I also notice that the building had an address on it, which seems like valuable information to keep somewhere.
Black_Diamond (2023-07-18 19:21:13+00:00): I question the existence of the address. This parcel does not have an APN nor does it have an address according to Santa Clara LAFCO. These "buildings" do not exist on any satellite imagery available.
Black_Diamond (2023-07-18 19:29:27+00:00): Many other San Jose parks have parcel numbers and addresses in Santa Clara LAFCO. This park isn't one of them, and the references to this location show up as Kurte Park, Communications Hill without a numbered address. If you feel that it's a valid address, it would be helpful if you can cite an authoritative source of the address. If there were buildings there, they aren't there now.
impiaaa (2023-07-18 20:11:31+00:00): The import was from an authoritative data source, the City of San José. You can browse the data here: https://csj.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=3c5516412b594e79bd25c49f10fc672f
impiaaa (2023-07-18 20:13:52+00:00): Santa Clara LAFCO is authoritative for the boundaries of cities within Santa Clara County. It is not the authority on addresses within the cities, or roads, or anything else.
Black_Diamond (2023-07-18 23:54:52+00:00): Yeah that source has the address. I’ll update the park accordingly later today.
Black_Diamond (2023-07-19 00:30:00+00:00): The park information has been updated with the confirmed information.
jmrfrosa (2023-07-18 09:17:12+00:00): Olá Miguel,

Nas tuas últimas edições tens eliminado uma série de caminhos e trilhos, muitos dos quais continuam válidos, bem como outros objectos importantes (como um marco geodésico no Palácio do Rei do Lixo). Existe algum motivo para estas alterações, ou foram apenas acidentais?

Convido-te ainda a juntares-te ao nosso canal de Telegram, onde é possível ter uma conversa mais ágil: https://t.me/OSMPortugal
Rui CT7ALW (2023-07-18 10:07:31+00:00): Olá Miguel,

Changesets como este tem apagado uma série de caminhos válidos. Isto tem sido feito por acidente?

As "várias adições" são mais "várias subtrações".  Foi acidental?

Convido-te ainda a juntares-te ao nosso canal de Telegram, onde é possível ter uma conversa mais ágil: https://t.me/OSMPortugal
RicoElectrico (2023-08-09 22:16:31+00:00): Cześć. https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3825410 oraz https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3825409 - ustosunkuj się proszę. Dzięki!
felipeeugenio (2023-08-28 14:32:34+00:00): Hola Camilo
Hay un tema con la calle Cuncumén.
Se llamaba efectivamente Calle Once antes?
El nombre lo cambiaste por el SII o fue una visita presencial?
porque un usuario lo cambio de vuelta a Calle Once y tiene dudas. Solo para aclarar.
gracias
Camilo Nuñez Castro (2023-08-28 15:31:10+00:00): Hola Felipe, buen día.
Respecto a la calle cuncumen, huepil, atacalco y Quilacoya son nombres que aparecen en la web de mapa SII.
Respecto a lo presencial, solo se mantiene letrero de nombre de calle para la calle huepil (ex calle 12) y para avenida central desde la calle diez hacia el poniente, sin embargo, desde el diez hacia el oriente (santa Cecilia) no tiene nombre pero en la web mapa SII sale como Quilacoya.

De igual manera para salir de la duda estuve revisando la web de la florida y converse con un funcionario del departamento de emergencias y gestión de riesgo y desastres comunales, donde me señala que el mapa que ellos utilizan es el publicado en la web (https://ibb.co/gJ6BDV9) pero están claros que mucha gente seguirá llamando a las calles con su nombre inicial o old_name.

Te cuento además que recientemente me uni al grupo Telegram con el nombre de "Camilo NC"

Saludos
MxxCon (2023-07-18 03:15:02+00:00): Hello.
You keep creating notes written from the first person. However, somebody looking at these features at some point in the future will have no idea who "I" is.
While what you did is not outright wrong, it's creates confusion and ambiguity. It's much better to write such notes in a neutral tone and with consideration that somebody would be reading this 2, 3, 5, or even 10 years later.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138644088
emersonveenstra (2023-07-19 11:07:30+00:00): Hi,

You added a way with no tags here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1190288333 

could you please go back and tag it? Thanks!
mueschel (2023-07-19 09:58:11+00:00): Hi,
you added many "lanes:backward:psv" tags and similar.
The usual key for this is "lanes:psv:backward" (first the vehicle type and then the direction).

Could you have a look and fix this?
arichnad (2023-07-20 18:29:25+00:00): You bet
arichnad (2023-07-20 19:07:51+00:00): I think I fixed it mueschel.  Thank you for your service!


way[~"lanes:(backward|forward):"~"^"]({{bbox}});(._;>;);  now returns zero results in dc.  I do see "hov:lanes:backward:conditional" in alexandria, which I'm guessing is supposed to be "lanes:hov:...", but it wasn't me this time.
mueschel (2023-07-20 19:53:40+00:00): Thanks!
Both 
hov:lanes:... and lanes:hov:... are valid tags. The first is an access tag with the :lanes suffix (i.e. which lanes are allowed for hov) while the second is a lanes tag for a special type of traffic (i.e. how many lanes for hov exist).

There's a page in the Wiki detailing the most common order in keys: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Order_of_key_parts
Rui CT7ALW (2023-07-18 10:07:44+00:00): Olá Miguel,

Changesets como este tem apagado uma série de caminhos válidos. Isto tem sido feito por acidente?

As "várias adições" são mais "várias subtrações".  Foi acidental?

Convido-te ainda a juntares-te ao nosso canal de Telegram, onde é possível ter uma conversa mais ágil: https://t.me/OSMPortugal
warkaree (2023-07-18 05:28:22+00:00): नमस्कार,

उत्कर्ष चौकात काम चालू असल्याने इथे रस्त्यांची जोडणी तुटली आहे माझ्या माहितीनुसार. आपण हे रस्ते परत जोडले आहे तर ह्यासाठी आपला माहिती स्त्रोत काय आहे?
ana_t7 (2023-07-18 06:28:22+00:00): Hi, 
  Thanks for highlighting this. Connectivity was added based on the GPS traces and other imagery evidences. Kindly let us know if there is any ongoing work so that we can change as "Road under construction" attribute.
  Thank you.
warkaree (2023-07-18 07:03:50+00:00): हो. रस्त्याचे काम चालू आहे. ह्या चौकात वळण घेता येत नाही. कृपया आपले बदल पूर्ववत करा ही विनंती. त्याच प्रमाणे भविष्यात बदल करण्यापूर्वी अलीकडे केलेले बदलसंच तपासून आपण करत असलेलो बदल हे योग्य आहेत की नाही ह्याची पुष्टी करूनच बदल करावे ही विनंती.
ana_t7 (2023-07-18 07:20:46+00:00): Hi, 
   Thanks for updating myself. Sure I will do that change, and I will make sure not to repeat this kind of mistakes in the future
warkaree (2023-07-18 07:24:20+00:00): धन्यवाद! :)
warkaree (2023-07-18 05:19:39+00:00): नमस्कार,

हा रस्ता नक्की बंद झाला आहे का? आपण ह्याला highway=construction असे टॅग दिले आहे, ह्या माहितीचे स्त्रोत काय आहे? मी परवाच ह्या रस्त्याने गेलो होतो तेव्हा हा चालू होता..
warkaree (2023-07-19 02:42:53+00:00): नमस्कार, ह्याबद्दल उत्तर मिळेल का?
ana_t7 (2023-07-19 03:26:12+00:00): Hi, 
   Thanks for highlighting this,  it was added based on our internal evidence. Reverted the changes. Road modelled as like as previous.
nevw (2023-07-18 05:13:53+00:00): Hi
is Powergate Australia the name of the building at 44 Market St, or is the company located on particular floors?
You should instead add a node within the the building footprint and add all the company details to the node instead of the building using their website
https://powergateaustralia.com.au/contact-us/
nevw (2023-07-29 13:08:14+00:00): no response. Company does not occupy all floors of building...reverted
user_8655426 (2023-07-18 03:49:12+00:00): こんにちは。OpenStreetMapへようこそ。
進行方向制限リレーションを OpenStreetMapに追加されていますが、それらの情報はどのように調べていますか？ 変更セットに source タグが付与されていません。

JA:変更セット
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:変更セット

JA:変更セットの良いコメント
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:変更セットの良いコメント

JA:Key:source
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Key:source

アップロードの際に変更セットに source タグを追加し、情報源の明示をお願いいたします。

また、「あなたたち」は組織的編集を行っているように見えます。ガイドラインが定められていますので、念のため以下のページのご確認もお願いいたします。

JA:Organised Editing Guidelines
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Organised_Editing_Guidelines
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138644774
Tommybara (2023-07-19 03:57:04+00:00): Xin đừng vẽ chồng lên những ways có sẵn như bạn đang làm. Làm như vậy là không đúng, tôi đã nhắc bạn trong tin nhắn riêng rồi, không rõ bạn có đọc được không?

Please do not draw a new way that overlaps an existing way like what you just did here. I sent you several private messages about this matter, not sure if you have seen it.
user_8655426 (2023-07-18 03:50:16+00:00): こんにちは。OpenStreetMapへようこそ。
進行方向制限リレーションを OpenStreetMapに追加されていますが、それらの情報はどのように調べていますか？ 変更セットに source タグが付与されていません。

JA:変更セット
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:変更セット

JA:変更セットの良いコメント
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:変更セットの良いコメント

JA:Key:source
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Key:source

アップロードの際に変更セットに source タグを追加し、情報源の明示をお願いいたします。

また、「あなたたち」は組織的編集を行っているように見えます。ガイドラインが定められていますので、念のため以下のページのご確認もお願いいたします。

JA:Organised Editing Guidelines
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Organised_Editing_Guidelines
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138645384
Rui CT7ALW (2023-07-18 10:07:53+00:00): Olá Miguel,

Changesets como este tem apagado uma série de caminhos válidos. Isto tem sido feito por acidente?

As "várias adições" são mais "várias subtrações".  Foi acidental?

Convido-te ainda a juntares-te ao nosso canal de Telegram, onde é possível ter uma conversa mais ágil: https://t.me/OSMPortugal
user_5359 (2023-07-18 06:52:57+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I remove your SEO SPAM (mostly foreign keys).
edvac (2023-07-18 10:58:35+00:00): Dear wizerbar,

In this changeset you added house numbers to several buildings. Yet, you say the source are Esri aerial imagery, from which we can't get house numbers.

There are repeated claims you are using cadastre data for your edits.

Please, stop your mapping until you explain what the sources of your data are.

Best regards,

Rafael Avila Coya, on behalf of the OSM Foundation, Data Working Group

[Ticket#2023071110000084]

Уважаемый wizerbar,

В этом наборе изменений Вы добавили номера домов к нескольким зданиям. При этом Вы указываете, что источником являются аэрофотоснимки Esri, из которых мы не можем получить номера домов.

Вы неоднократно утверждали, что используете для своих правок кадастровые данные.

Пожалуйста, прекратите картографирование, пока не объясните, что является источником ваших данных.

С наилучшими пожеланиями,

Rafael Avila Coya, OSMF Data Working Group

[Ticket#2023071110000084]
wizerbar (2023-07-21 03:18:02+00:00): Смешно читать о каких-то жалобах в мой адрес. Все изменения делаются на основе личных наблюдений и в ряде случаев отличаются от неправильных кадастровых данных. Любой нормальный человек понимает, что номера домов нельзя обозначить по спутниковым фото. Но, например, у Вас не возникает вопроса откуда в пакете правок https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138774199 я знаю о смене вида дорожного покрытия произведенного вчера? Обвинять меня в нарушении чьих-то авторских прав такой же абсурд  как обвинять Вас в педофилии на основе фото с африканскими детьми.
4004 (2023-07-21 09:24:34+00:00): Здравствуйте, снова.
Рафаэль не на пустом месте написал вам с вопросом (а не жалобой), учитывая, что вы раньше ссылались на кадастровые данные (которые теперь правильно подмечаете как частично неверные). Те же самые ошибки из кадастра встречаются в яндексе, например.
Данные на основе личных наблюдений, разумеется, подходят для внесения в осм, и как правило, они обозначаются как источник правки (при загрузке) в дополнение к снимкам, либо же они вносятся через мобильный редактор прямо во время наблюдений.
Если у вас есть какие то сомнения или вопросы по поводу источников данных, комментариев к правкам или необоснованным претензиям, вы можете обговорить их с местным сообществом, например в телеграм (t.me/byosm)
TheNet1996 (2023-07-18 05:06:52+00:00): Hallo,
willkommen bei OpenStreetMap! :)

Zwei Fragen zu deiner Änderung:
1. Kann man bei Euch auch das Auto waschen, da hier eine Waschanlage eingetragen wurde?! Oder ist das nur ein Firmenbüro - wonach es für mich aussieht?!
2. Hier wurde eine Straße quer durchs Wohngebiet gezeichnet: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/504168207
Das war wohl ein versehen, oder?

Danke & Grüße
Mike
TheNet1996 (2023-07-20 05:51:54+00:00): Korrektur durchgeführt:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138745304
Glassman (2023-07-19 18:01:13+00:00): #TIP: Leave a changeset comment to help when you want to go back to a previous edit.

Also - A number of the sidewalks you added were not connected. By not connecting them, routers are unable to use them. I fixed the ones I noticed.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138646884
Hike-wolf (2023-07-19 18:26:22+00:00): Thanks for feedback. I’ll go through and connect, and make them unmarked crossings. 

In this area, look at Tacoma Ave, how do you recommend doing the bike lane?  Leave the gaps, or change to fill gaps with unmarked crossings?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138646884
Glassman (2023-07-19 18:45:37+00:00): Tacoma Avenue was already tagged with a bike lane. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle for help with mapping bike lanes. 

From the imagery, I'd map the bike lanes as attributes of the street. If they are separated then I'd add them as separate ways. 

Where I live there aren't many bike lanes so I don't do much bike mapping. A better place to ask is on Slack. We have a number of active cyclists there.
literan (2024-06-19 17:21:23+00:00): тег addr:city - для указания названия населенного пункта (и вообще, в России он не нужен, излишен). Не используйте его для всего подряд, например, для указания коттеджных поселков или СНТ. 
Также не надо писать туда слова "деревня", "город" и т.п. - только название