piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
TrickyFoxy (2025-04-23 10:35:43+00:00): Откройте статью в википедии и прочтите что она описывает. Статья может называться как угодно, но описывает она этот парк, поэтому за очередное удаление викитегов будем говорить через DWG.
Soshal Distan Singh (2025-04-24 02:17:24+00:00): Вы проигнорировали тот факт, что у объекта Дача Эбсворт ("Литания") другая граница. И это уже не первый раз в случае с этим парком, когда вы ошибаетесь с границами бывших дач. Я только что проверил остальные участки, и везде неправильные границы. Так что участки я убрал и объединил в одно отношение "парк Новознаменка".
Между прочим, объект культурного наследия Дача Воронцова "Новознаменка" и площадной объект "парк Новознаменка" в границах не совпадают (так что эта заметка мимо: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13444118).

К тому же, все эти бывшие дачи хоть и существуют официально, но исключительно на бумаге чиновников. На местности один сплошной парк Новознаменка, не разбитый ни на какие участки (вам на это уже указывали: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113827439). Википедия может и не является доверенным источником информации, но там человек работу проделал (вы же никогда не снабжаете свои правки ссылками на конкретные источники). Отсутствие официального статуса не является препятствием для внесения в ОСМ. Напротив, если ничего кроме этого статуса нет, то и вносить незачем. Кстати, недавно вы удалили название у ручья, у которого с официальным названием был полный порядок.

В общем, поддерживаю TrickyFoxy: в следующий раз придётся через DWG.
Glassman (2025-04-20 20:06:33+00:00): #TIP: include the tag addr:city= when adding an address. While we are a geospatial system, it just nice to include the city.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165172601
MxxCon (2025-04-21 03:17:09+00:00): Hello.
Please note that the correct way to tag this feature is https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dbrownfield
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165172605
MxxCon (2025-04-21 03:18:18+00:00): Hello.
Please note the correct way to tag closed business is by using lifecycle prefix as documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused:*
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165172646
das-g (2025-04-19 22:21:41+00:00): Ups, falscher Link. Sollte https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4717585 sein.
MxxCon (2025-04-21 03:21:31+00:00): Hello.

The correct way to tag closed biz is by using lifecycle profix as documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused:*
And it is most definitely incorrect to change this POI's street name to "Vacant business".
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165172809
OSM_RogerWilco (2025-04-20 20:27:44+00:00): ...und POIs in Grethem angepasst/ergänzt.
synfarer (2025-05-26 19:47:35+00:00): Hi! You added node 12769334139 as a railway=milestone, but also tagged it with railway:signal:* tags. Is it actually a signal?
CreCrePL (2025-05-26 19:52:31+00:00): It's a milepost with a speed signal on it too.
impiaaa (2025-04-21 17:21:29+00:00): Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing! I might suggest being more specific in your changeset description about what you changed—for example, "added sidewalks" or "aligned buildings." You can find more examples here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments Thanks!
0235 (2025-06-13 10:59:09+00:00): Maybe it has changed since I last visited, but the Bridleway which you updated (Way: 426321869) This used to have no entry / Private signs. (only on the south side though)

Do you believe this has now been opened to the public?

I remember, I walked all the way along, to find a locked gate, and had to walk all the way back.
af7567 (2025-06-13 11:09:11+00:00): This has been a public bridleway for at least 35 years since I lived in Rushton as a kid. The no "unauthorised" entry signs at the south end were put up a few years ago by the security company looking after the electric train track equipment but it is still a bridleway leading all the way to Manor Road in Rushton.
The council definitive map can be viewed here: https://www.northnorthants.gov.uk/rights-way-and-searches/definitive-map
af7567 (2025-06-13 11:17:19+00:00): Just for fun, here is a map from 1901 showing it marked as a Bridge Road :) https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=15.2&lat=52.43165&lon=-0.74311&layers=6&b=ESRIWorld&o=100
af7567 (2025-06-13 11:17:50+00:00): Sorry, Bridle Road.
0235 (2025-06-13 11:26:11+00:00): Thank-you for your fast response. Good to know its just companies putting signs up with the hope of keeping people away.

I am glad that it is still open :)

Also, spooky. I first saw the NLS overlayer maps just a few days ago, and spent yesterday adding some of them to JOSM, and then i see a second one today.
habi (2025-08-14 07:40:51+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1378994590 ist auf dem swisstopo Geländemodell (auch in ID verfügbar) wunderbar zu sehen.
Du hat den Weg immer etwas zu "hoch" gezeichnet, ich habe das in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1378994590 korrgiert.
Gruss,
habi
habi (2025-08-14 07:41:13+00:00): In https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170421766 :)
xzu (2025-04-20 01:09:32+00:00): I've reported all of them to https://www.gov.pl/web/kmpsp-bydgoszcz/dane-kontaktowe
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-21 09:36:53+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12769298357/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
xzu (2025-04-20 01:09:50+00:00): I've reported it to https://www.gov.pl/web/kmpsp-bydgoszcz/dane-kontaktowe
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-23 17:29:28+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12769370570/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
Yilin Meng (2025-04-28 04:32:26+00:00): Here is an international express delivery service named SF Express, mainly providing international express delivery services from Canada to other countries, as well as to other places.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-28 05:50:47+00:00): Is it an internal office of that company unavailable to clients?

Or place where you walk in with package to be delivered and you can pay and leave it there to be delivered?
Mikhail Kuzin (2025-08-21 11:49:28+00:00): Здравствуйте. А это так задумано было чтобы тротуар улетел на центр дороги или ошибка какая-то?
mstrbrid (2025-05-29 15:47:46+00:00): Hi, could you please explain why the inner residential areas aren't members of the multipolygon? I was just about to add a new area in Montpelier to the relation, but now I'm unsure whether I should or not!
LordGarySugar (2025-05-29 16:07:41+00:00): Hi, the huge residential multipolygon is not a standard way of representing a city's landuse areas, hence why I have been gradually splitting pieces off with the ambition of eliminating it altogether. The reason that the more central areas are not part of the MP (anymore) is because they are only simple polygons, if you look at the relation currently it only contains residential areas that have 'inner' ways and these require more work to simplify.
LordGarySugar (2025-05-29 16:08:12+00:00): Tldr: No, don't do it!
mstrbrid (2025-05-29 18:48:46+00:00): OK, grand. Is there a logic you're following to decide what size parcels to split the MP into?
LordGarySugar (2025-05-29 19:26:06+00:00): Here I'm not splitting it as much as I usually would, just for the sake of time. My primary goal is to eliminate all 'inner' areas, so I will divide the landuse along a road that helps me to reach the area (eg a school) so that I can exclude it while only using simple polygons. I will definitely make sure it's split by primary, secondary tertiary roads, and then also split off sections that are only connected to the main blob by a relatively thin area. In places I've done to an extreme (i.e. Bushey, Herts) residential landuse never crosses even a residential road, lines up with property boundaries perfectly and has carve-outs for all other landuse like allotments, grass and substations. I have run some overpass turbo queries over Wales recently to find the absolute largest residential landuses and split them up.
mstrbrid (2025-05-29 21:07:56+00:00): Brill, thanks for the Bushey example. I see there, though, you've also separated neighbouring areas along residential roads, not just primary-tertiary. Eg:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1299092272,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1299092269, & https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1272132126.
How do you decide what object is significant enough to separate them, and also to create a corridor space where the road passes? 
I'm guessing this has all been discussed somewhere, I could head there to read up on the background arguments?
LordGarySugar (2025-05-30 02:52:24+00:00): There's nothing to read, it's just my own personal mapping style! I make use of osmuk cadastral parcels to trace landuse according to property boundaries. Basically anything that's part of a private residence inc. garden and driveway goes inside residential landuse and everything else doesn't (multi-property garages, pavements, shared parking areas). Any argument will be over whether mapping to that level is a good use of time, but certainly there's nothing wrong with adding more detail in the way I have done. The primary-tertiary example was here for Bristol only where my goal is to split up the multipolygon only, not to create extremely detailed landuse as I have done elsewhere.
LordGarySugar (2025-05-30 02:54:47+00:00): I've found this thread which might be relevant to you, I've only skimmed over it https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/exclude-residential-roads-from-residential-area/108924
A Hall (2026-07-29 12:56:54+00:00): Hello! I see you marked this relationship as landuse=forest. Per guidance, this should only be used when the exact area of a boundary shares the exact boundary of the landuse. In this case, this edit suggests that Kendall Pond, a body of water, is a forest. 

There's additional guidance on how to map boundary=forest here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dforest#How_to_map
Nathan_A_RF (2025-04-27 16:31:10+00:00): Hey, a reminder that dual carriageways have a 70 mph national speed limit. I've amended the road near J18.
felipeeugenio (2025-04-20 16:12:23+00:00): Hola. Borró una buena cantidad de edificios. Ya no existen?
Por otro lado, le pedimos por favor no cambiar las clasificaciones de caminos sin consultar a la comunidad. Saludos
felipeeugenio (2025-04-20 16:19:16+00:00): Hola. Demasiados errores en la edición. Se reversa por completo.
Udarian (2025-04-20 23:52:28+00:00): whats the source for this commit as the website of the car dealership has keywords in it added by google maps and we are not allowed to use them as a source for commits due to license issues.
FlamingoOSM (2025-04-21 13:07:17+00:00): Sorry, you are correct. I just copied the link straight from Google Maps. I checked now, the correct URL is https://www.lexusofnorthmiami.com/
Baloo Uriza (2025-04-20 15:52:25+00:00): I remapped this as a private ford, closed entirely to motor vehicles, since that what it appears to be by all available sources.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165175764
A Hall (2025-08-04 13:35:15+00:00): Hi! Just wondering if you used any guidance when adding the landuse=forest to the protected areas around Stark, NH? It was my understanding that the landcover of a boundary (such as Nash Stream Forest) should be mapped separately. The reasoning is that the edges of a forest rarely align with the boundaries of protected areas, and a blanket forest over the entire tract of land doesn't represent the roads, fields, buildings, and bodies of water that are often present.
jhaluska80 (2025-04-20 02:30:09+00:00): Forgot to include, addresses were taken from the Albemarle County GIS.
b-jazz (2025-04-21 02:34:16+00:00): Hello Enjoister,

You are breaking/deleting multipolygon relations and leaving behind a comment of "Fixing" fairways. This is actually not fixing them. You might be confused, but just in case I'm the one that is confused, can you explain what is wrong with the fairways before you deleted the relation? I'm confident that they are correct and want to chat with you discuss any issues. Thanks.
Gregory Peony (2025-04-20 04:23:46+00:00): The footprints I flagged here outline multiple buildings. Good job trying to map accurate building shapes like the L and T shaped buildings. When mapping T shaped buildings with even 'shoulders' you can select the 4 shoulder nodes and press L to line them up making them even before squaring the footprint (q).
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165176232
NeisBot (2025-05-17 15:10:27+00:00): Hi Enjoister, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 99% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
No primary map features!?

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=165176281
NeisReview (2025-05-23 05:44:09+00:00): #golf #mapping
b-jazz (2025-04-21 03:03:46+00:00): RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1379008922

Please do not make a multipolygon relation with 20 different line segments that define the boundary of a fairway. The fairway should be a single closed path. Not one made of many different pieces.

Also, the fairway should extend around the green and share nodes with the outside edge. You should either leave space for the fringe, or you should draw the fairway on the inside boundary of the green, making sure to share the nodes on the boundary. Thanks.
SherbetS (2026-07-09 15:15:33+00:00): Hello,
When adding communication mast infrastructure, please use the "mast" preset in JOSM, not "communications tower".
Object: node/12769539248
See:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dcommunications_tower

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dmast

Thanks,
James
Hayleox (2026-07-09 16:47:45+00:00): Yep, sorry about that - this is a pretty old changeset and I switched to using mast a while ago. Thanks for fixing it! Best, Hayden
Sanniu (2025-04-20 08:47:33+00:00): Hi, isn't it the duplicate of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2079007398?
Oceanink (2025-05-06 04:21:23+00:00): This car repair shop moved to a new address. It's the same business just changed address to a new city.
Did I do the location change wrong?
Sanniu (2025-05-06 07:57:49+00:00): There are now two Ziso on the same street - one at Prashkovski 2 and another one at Prashkovski 4. Is it really the different place?
Oceanink (2025-05-06 10:04:07+00:00): I see it now.
Not sure how the duplicate was created.
I tried to move it to its new address but probably did something wrong.
Anyway, it's the same shop and the correct address is at number 4.
What's the best way to merge the two items?
Sanniu (2025-05-06 10:10:22+00:00): your node does not have history, so simply move osm.org/node/2079007398 to No4 and remove node from this changeset.
Oceanink (2025-05-06 10:23:23+00:00): Thanks.
Deleted the other one, but left the location because I think the numbering in this street are wrong. Number 2 and 4 seem to be the same structure.
literan (2025-04-20 11:15:32+00:00): и зачем надо было точку мозаичных панно удалять?
Baloo Uriza (2025-04-20 15:55:17+00:00): I tend to give sidewalks the same name as the street they're fronting in order to help blind users, but otherwise this seems fine.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165178120
user_5359 (2025-04-21 10:35:55+00:00): Hello! Why did you change description=<value> and description:he=<value> to Alt_description:he=<value>? The prefix alt_ means alternative to an existing (!) key. Apart from the fact that the leading letter (reading from left to right) is written in lower case, the key is missing. So why did you make this modification?
Tsur Halamish (2025-04-21 19:20:34+00:00): Hi
1. The description I changed and you restored is in Hebrew. You are obviously do not speak it. Hebrew does not have lower and upper case letters. In addition its read from right to left. 
2. Specifically this description text does not describe the point of the  Pan temple at all. It has to do with the whole touristic site that the temple is part of and includes springs and more. Therefore the need to change. 
3. I left it as Alt just to preserve but realize now its not the right way.  I should have deleted it altogether
4. Your changing it back to a full description without understanding the text or allowing me time to reply properly is unprofessional. 
5. Please fully delete the current value in description:he. To really do good, why don't you research about the Pan Temple and add descriptions in English and German. Let me know and I will then be happy to add a proper Hebrew description.
user_5359 (2025-04-21 19:57:45+00:00): I didn‘t change your version!  Is it usual for you to accuse the reporter of vandalism when your mistakes are pointed out?
TrickyFoxy (2025-04-21 00:10:39+00:00): 👋 Примечания лучше писать в тег note=, а не в значение тега (operator=Уже не Рай По, operator=Хартия(по моему))
charles chilufya (2025-04-20 06:34:57+00:00): Hi your edits are not so good, are you sure you're using a correct imaginary?
If possible can you do corrections now by aligning them well before I flag every single edits made in this area? Ensure roads are not left hanging.
#QualityDataCheck #CorrectionsNeeded
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165178520
charles chilufya (2025-04-20 06:35:52+00:00): Please import small size, you're uploading more edits as your mapping experience is new, take your time and enjoy mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165178520
charles chilufya (2025-04-20 06:44:48+00:00): Hi AKi, 
Would please clarify the massive deletion of edits here before I revert then to old ones?
I'm worried and concerned.
#GlobalMapper #GlobalQualityCheck
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165178651
Aki_Suokas (2025-04-20 11:23:10+00:00): That area had (software generated?) coastline, that was propably based on low waterlever image.  As it had  very short lines.  In magnitude of meters.  And features which are when mean sea level under water surface.   I modified coastline to correspond the mean sea level coastline and increased distance between line points to more sensible (for me)  10 to 20 meters.  Based on same MML backround as pevious.

Aki
charles chilufya (2025-04-20 06:50:09+00:00): Hi Aklab.
Just checking the deleted trackway, looks like there is something like a path, or track way, why have you deleted just?
There is no comments either.
#GlobalCheck #GlobalOSMMapper #RandomValidator #DataQuality
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165178654
Filip009 (2025-05-20 17:49:40+00:00): Výška bodu https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12769693915 ale nesedí s vrstevnicami. Neviem, či ten bod uprostred je okej.
aceman444 (2025-05-21 20:50:22+00:00): Chapem, ale maju to tak aj ine sopky (pozrite napr. Vezuv alebo Mtt. Rainier). Reprezentuje to celkovu (maximalnu vysku sopky), nie nutne nadmorsku vysku na mieste kde je umiestneny bod. Tam je samozrejme krater, cize jama a vyska je nizsia ako maximalna.
Javi sa mi to v poriadku, pisu o tom aj na https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dvolcano#Relation_to_natural=peak .
Filip009 (2025-07-15 12:26:18+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168917069
wrp (2025-04-21 12:35:42+00:00): When OSM gives directions, it doesn't find the two new 'footpaths' between Nordbanegade and the park. Can anyone fix that?
Lostmonkey (2025-04-21 14:35:24+00:00): Er nok bare et spørgsmål om at give ruteberegningsmotorerne tid til at blive opdateret med den nye data. Har tidligere oplevet, at dette kan tage flere dage.
wrp (2025-04-21 20:44:31+00:00): 👍
Hunte (2025-04-20 14:55:02+00:00): Moin,

Ich bin vorhin dort vorbei, da ist immer noch Bauland. Hier im Hinweis ist ein aktuelles Bild:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4718777#map=13/53.14126/8.25700&layers=N
Ich schlage vor wir machen einen revert con deinen Änderungen.
WackyBellry (2025-04-20 19:57:59+00:00): Okay, hab mich vom Luftbild verleiten lassen.
Hunte (2025-04-20 20:38:44+00:00): Ja die Luftbilder sind leider teilweise über 2 Jahre alt. Ich einen revert gemacht.
ticho2 (2025-04-22 21:43:50+00:00): Ahoj, dve pripomienky.

Za prve, tag "name" je dobre pridat len na ten bod (point of interest) ktory ste pridali, ale nepridavat ho na budovu, v ktorej ocividne sidli aj posta, a mozno aj nieco dalsie.

Za druhe, na pridanom bode je nespravne pouzity tag "information", ten sa pouziva na nieco ine, a to informacne body. Vid https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:information . Odporucam tento tag zmazat.

Vdaka!
micheleOSM3 (2026-01-11 07:35:23+00:00): "Puanina Tour" is the name already used in the relation, you should not set it on the way
eggie (2025-04-20 15:31:02+00:00): Dag casssis.. Tip Het beste kun je op een adresnode bijtaggen of een adresnode aanmaken.
Nu hebben het vlak en de node een ander adres.
Wanneer het gebouw zelf zo heet kun je de gebouwnaam inderdaad op het pand zelf zetten.
MVG
eggie
Andrea Musuruane (2025-04-21 08:16:45+00:00): Ciao. Inserire i tag addr:* senza specificare addr:housenumber non porta alcun valore. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165180947
11daf (2025-04-24 10:38:04+00:00): Теперь все навигаторы поведут через центр Славянска-на-Кубани, вместо объездной. А пробка там знатная летом
toyotagps (2025-04-24 10:46:44+00:00): Может это вопрос больше к навигаторам? Почему они ведут по дороге ниже классом, когда есть выше? Править статусы дорог под программы навигации это шаг в никуда.
11daf (2025-04-24 12:41:14+00:00): 
highway=secondary это автомобильные дороги областного значения, соединяющие областные центры с крупными населёнными пунктами (районными центрами), а также крупные населённые пункты между собой. Отсюда: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:highway

Хорошо,  secondary и соединяет Славянск с Полтавской. Если трафик идёт через мост и Школьную в Трудобеликовском, тогда нужно убрать secondary с улицы Ленина в Трудобеликовском от кольца до примыкания Школьной.

Если люди ездят через объездную, понижать ту часть Ленина, что примыкает к мосту. 

Две таких дороги на хуторе, пусть и самом большом в мире, это не здорОво )
toyotagps (2025-04-24 13:39:46+00:00): Речь идет о дороге внутри населенного пункта.

highway=secondary в населённых пунктах — основные магистрали районов города (в небольших населённых пунктах могут отсутствовать).
Отсюда же: osm.wiki/RU:Key:highway

Здесь она присутствует т.к. является транзитной через город.

С вашим подходом не согласен.
11daf (2025-04-25 07:14:52+00:00): По вышеприведенной статье вики не может быть нетранзитных secondary  в населенных пунктах меньше райцетра.

Предлагаю удалить одну из двух в хуторе Трудобеликовский. Ту, по которой нет трафика из Славянска-на-Кубани в Полтавскую. Ну или вернуть как было до этой правки.

Это не мой подход, это принципы тегирования дорог в OSМ на основании значимости. И это всяко лучше подхода "сделаем тут всё жёлтеньким как в яндексе, потому что там умные сидят"
toyotagps (2025-04-25 07:27:57+00:00): Ту, по которой нет трафика из Славянска-на-Кубани в Полтавскую сделать tertiary?

И не нужно мне про яндекс напоминать. Я задобался править "аля яндекс/2гис" и "мне так удобнее".
11daf (2025-04-25 09:50:06+00:00): Да