piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
DressyPear4 (2022-12-28 22:35:56+00:00): Olá, ajustei a tag desse local
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130618289
zamekzamek (2023-02-01 08:55:55+00:00): Proszę, wycofaj zmiany w zabudowie Ostródzka 273-273D, a przynajmniej określ te budynki jako 5 par bliźniaków, skoro już postanowiłeś usunąć podział na poszczególne posesje. Ja tam mieszkam i wiem, że to nie są budynki mieszkalne wielorodzinne.
syntex (2023-02-01 11:20:18+00:00): Ok, zmieniłem. Dziwne, że formalnie nie podzielono tych budynków np na dwie lub nawet na cztery części tylko formalnie są jednym obiektem.
eggie (2022-12-29 07:39:21+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-12-29 07:59:25+00:00): Hoi..

Ziet er goed uit.
https://www.satellietdataportaal.nl/?base=openstreetmap&res=0.5&datemin=29-12-2021&loc=51.38679%2C5.152330%2C16z&overlay=mos-0&marker=loc&acqdate=2022-11-12&acqid=20221112_105329_SV1-04&sensor=SuperView-1
Groet
eggie
Langlaeufer (2022-12-30 02:40:40+00:00): Das passt jetzt aber nicht. Die Zufahrt ist jetzt nur über den Gehweg zu erreichen 
Grüße
Langlaeufer (2022-12-30 03:13:00+00:00): Es fehlt die Verbindung zur Fahrbahn der Beneckeallee sonst wäre es ein fußweg
Jordi MF (2023-01-01 23:46:09+00:00): Hola dr_grijando,
He estado revisando los picos que has añadido por la zona de la Marina. He mantenido algunos picos que yo anteriormente había considerado como "hills". Sin embargo, veo que has usado como fuente al IGN y, en el País Valenciano, usamos la toponimia oficial de la Acadèmia Valenciana de la Llengua, organismo que se encarga de la toponimia oficial. El mapa del IGN tiene muchos errores que la AVL corrige, tanto ortográficos como geográficos. Por tanto, los usuarios valencianos de OSM nos basamos en estas correcciones toponímicas.
Por este motivo, verás que he eliminado diversos picos que ya se encuentran mapeados en el lugar correcto según la toponimia oficial valenciana.
Saludos,
Jordi
GerdP (2023-02-20 09:27:47+00:00): Moin!
Du hast hier z.B. hier https://www.osm.org/way/193951438 den Bioreaktor (oder wie auch immer man das nennt) selbst als Generator gemappt. Nach meinem Verständnis wird in diesen Gebäuden (die nach meiner Kenntnis mit building=digester erfasst werden, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE%3ATag%3Abuilding%3Ddigester) nur das Biogas produziert, dass dann in einem Generator zur Strom und Wärme verarbeitet wird. Der Generator ist aber doch nicht in diesen Gebäuden, oder?
Kai Johnson (2022-12-29 20:50:45+00:00): USFS has this road clearly named "Sheephead Mountain Road" to match the local "Sheephead Mountain" peak. The change to "Spearhead Mountain Road" was erroneous and I have reverted it.
ashs_as (2022-12-29 11:05:45+00:00): Hello kaliphe;
I see you added unofficial values in the "name" and "maxspeed"
Could you check it and fix them, please?
Link for the street:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1042518779
For more information about "maxspeed" and "name"
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxspeed#:~:text=The%20maxspeed%20%3D*%20tag%20is,a%20different%20units%20if%20necessary.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name
Regards
ashs_as
Kai Johnson (2022-12-29 20:48:52+00:00): This section of road is either named "Thing Valley Road" (according to USFS and USGS) or "Desert View Road" (according to SanGIS). The USFS name is more likely to be correct as this road is managed by USFS. There is no evidence to support the fictitious name in the prior changeset so I have reverted the change.
Mannivu (2023-02-10 16:22:23+00:00): Ciao, in generale in Italia gli indirizzi non vanno inseriti sugli edifici (perché l'indirizzo non indica un edificio, ma un ingresso).
JezCrow (2022-12-30 21:10:35+00:00): ... but services are still shown in the working timetable (though next scheduled is not until 19th February due to strike and five weekends of engineering works): https://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/service/gb-nr:Y42858/2023-02-19/detailed
_Mathieu_ (2022-12-30 22:23:49+00:00): ...weird, it was announced as closed in May 2022: https://www.northernrailway.co.uk/sites/default/files/2022-10/Northern%20Retail%20Brief%20-%20Teesside%20Airport%20station%20closure%20from%20010522_Redacted.pdf

I've asked Northern Railway about the exact status, thanks for the heads up.
_Mathieu_ (2022-12-31 11:49:24+00:00): Northern Railway confirms that service is still suspended for the foreseeable future at this station, although timetable show the opposite (and pass real time data show that the train actually doesn't stop there https://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/service/gb-nr:Y42858/2022-12-11/detailed )
JezCrow (2023-01-03 00:37:50+00:00): Thanks for checking - I was confused by a quote from the metro mayor in a press article at the end of November '22 stating the station was closed but the train still stops there, which seemed to me contradictory!
eggie (2022-12-29 08:04:33+00:00): Denk alleen dat je regel  source=BING; 3dshapes niet kan kloppen.
Dus dat kun je evt even veranderen. 
Satellietdataportaal kun je in josm ook als achtergrond gebruiken.
https://www.satellietdataportaal.nl/?base=openstreetmap&res=0.5&datemin=29-12-2021&loc=51.39865%2C5.145088%2C17z&overlay=mos-0&marker=loc&acqdate=2022-11-12&acqid=20221112_105329_SV1-04&sensor=SuperView-1
Groet
eggie
eggie (2022-12-30 09:33:00+00:00): Ben nu toch aan het kijken.. 
Van de boundery natura 2000 Kempenlandwest heb ik bicycle=yes verwijderd.
Dat is kennelijk in deze changeset  gebeurd (vvorgaande mapper) 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124596571

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=124596571

Zal wel een vergissing zijn geweest. 

De beek ligt nu los van de landuse hier. 
Wanneer er goede luichtfoto's beschikbaar komen zou je de beek ook als vlak nog kunnen intekenen met behoud van de waterway-stream en netje kunnen uitsnijden met CutOutPolygon.
skyper (2023-01-12 15:20:03+00:00): Hallo Dreisamfuchs,
SC scheint `cycleway=no` nicht zu entfernen, wenn `cycleway:right=*` und `cycleway:left=*` gesetzt werden. Siehe u.a. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/874893798/history.
Kannst Du das bitte den Entwickler*innen melden.
Danke und Grüße,
skyper
Nordpfeil (2022-12-30 11:25:25+00:00): Use used the tag
Dari name = کوتل زردولو
The problem is, that your tag "Dari name" is unvalid due to the space between Darin and name and will not be interpretated by any software using OSM data.
It is not easy to solve: There is no ISO 639 code (https://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/php/code_list.php) for the Dari language.
To avoid missunderstandings using I suggest to have a look to the other name:**-options >>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names
You could also use
int_name =  Kotel Zardolo or name:en = Kotel Zardolo
and name = کوتل زردولو
or use alt_name=** (alternative name) or loc_name=** (local name)
user_5359 (2022-12-31 06:40:41+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1125512348. What is the meaning of the tag Dari Name = بازار دی رازی?
Aria Manage (2022-12-28 23:34:34+00:00): This Exchange called FJSE is set to open to the public of Fiji in 2028, it currently remains under development
MxxCon (2023-01-01 02:08:25+00:00): This feature will be deleted. I see no evidence of it existing in any satellite imagery imager.y
If it's going to open in 2028, you are welcome to map it then. OSM is about what's in the world NOW, not was or will be.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130622146
Jakka (2022-12-29 07:51:41+00:00): attention de pas sur poser des landuse comme exemple zoom @ https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1125513452#map=17/50.61509/3.52982 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1125513453#map=17/50.61464/3.53024
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=130622164&relations=true
adiatmad (2022-12-29 10:54:00+00:00): Hi, good work on your edits! 
What's the meaning of "Dari Name"?
(https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1125514452)
You might want to take a look at this page (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Localization). Happy mapping!
VLD515 (2023-01-20 09:37:40+00:00): Based on the local street name sign at the location as well as the spelling in the Indonesian dictionary, the previous name Gang Empu Gandring IV was already correct. Why was this changed? We need to revert this back to the previous name.
Pegasus21 (2023-01-20 19:22:39+00:00): Thank you for bringing this up to me! I have changed it back to it's previous name. 
Pegasus21
adiatmad (2022-12-29 12:08:06+00:00): السَّلاَمُ عَلَيْكُمْ

Good work on your edits! However, it would be preferable to avoid adding a generic name, such as name=Mosque (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1125518929). You might want to take a look at this page (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions) and add the real name of mosque. Happy mapping!
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-19 19:38:35+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10292371667

what is here? hospital? doctor? Emergency evacuation point? Pharmacy?
nevw (2024-03-19 23:05:16+00:00): I added https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:emergency=disaster_response
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2022-12-29 03:55:05+00:00): 俗话说的好，再一再二不再三，但我看您一共是画了四次海峡大桥的changeset
如果继续看到这类编辑的话，陆台两侧联合行动给您封号的可能性将大幅增加
Userinexile (2022-12-29 10:59:29+00:00): 哦？那proposed注记是干嘛的？我明白此未开工，所以故意用了proposed，帮助文档里说这个表示在规划中
Supaplex (2022-12-29 02:47:22+00:00): Hi 百度地圖應該是版權物，與 OpenStreetMap 授權並不相容，請別用版權地圖資訊加到 OpenStreetMap，參見 legal: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Legal

台海大橋短時間不會成真，不要浪費時間在這種畫爽的圖徵。先前台灣社群也有討論，認為這種單方面規畫不能與既有道路網連結
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130624001
TheBestIdea (2023-02-03 20:46:23+00:00): Hi hdevine825! 

Just wondering if you meant to set Bergen St between 6th Av and Flatbush to two way for bikes with a one way contraflow cycletrack on the left side by adding these tags:
cycleway:left:oneway=-1
oneway:bicycle=no

I bike this every day and it is one way w/b for bikes (and cars) with a protected bike lane in that direction.

This could be a glitch with StreetComplete, but either way I'm going to change it back.

Thanks for letting me know!

Brandon
TheBestIdea (2023-02-06 19:23:13+00:00): Hold up, we've had this discussion before! I'm see if anyone in the OSM slack can help figure out what is going on here with StreetComplete as that's way over my head.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119640654
hdevine825 (2023-02-06 19:40:30+00:00): I'm a little bit lost on the bike lane tagging myself. It shows correctly in Streetcomplete's UI. Are you seeing issues on a data consumers end?
TheBestIdea (2023-02-06 19:44:47+00:00): I already changed this back, but the tags were what I put up above and looking at the CyclOSM layer it was definitely rendering as a two way street for bikes/one way for cars with a contraflow protected bike lane.
Rukkhadevata (2022-12-29 02:23:08+00:00): 未实际开工的工程不能体现于OSM上，即使再次画上，社区人员也是会发现并回退的。
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2022-12-29 03:51:19+00:00): 但是按照OSM的原则，OSM反映的是“当前”状态，因此海峡大桥尚未建设的话，确实不能画，这个和国内百度高德有所不同。

顺便，百度地图的京台高速（含海峡大桥）和京台高铁**大量放卫星**，甚至远超我国基建能力，不建议参考。
Userinexile (2022-12-29 10:57:58+00:00): 哦？那proposed注记是干嘛的？我明白此未开工，所以故意用了proposed，帮助文档里说这个表示在规划中
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2022-12-29 14:51:51+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/130623555 中您评论了完全一致的内容，这里就不再逐个回复了

如果您真的看了文档，那您就应当看到这条内容：

Warning
	Note that generally, OpenStreetMap requires information to be verifiable on the ground. Proposed features that are not visible on the ground should therefore only be mapped in exceptional cases and after a discussion with the relevant OSM community, lest they might be deleted for lack of verifiability.
stevea (2022-12-29 06:06:08+00:00): Nice!  Thanks for entering / tagging these.
CurlingMan13 (2022-12-29 18:07:31+00:00): Be sure to close out your note when you are done adding it.
mariotomo (2023-01-04 19:28:18+00:00): hola. el área está llena de edificios, si quieres mejorar tu contribución, una idea sería de dibujar uno (son todos casi del mismo tamaño, y cuadrados) y copiar en las posiciones correspondientes. dibujar sólo uno, donde hay dos, no ayuda a mejorar OSM.
estás en un proceso de aprendizaje? o son contribuciones independientes?
DavidKarlas (2022-12-29 12:06:44+00:00): Hi,

looks like https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15058963 is broken, could you try to close it?

Thank you!
Rukkhadevata (2023-01-10 16:24:11+00:00): I've done demarcating the border around here, thanks for the reminder!
scotteaton92 (2023-04-14 19:34:40+00:00): Why did you add w1125535205? There is no path.
scotteaton92 (2023-04-14 19:52:45+00:00): Why did you tag w131818344 as a footway? It had been tagged as a path (available to bicycles as well) with local knowledge as a source.
scotteaton92 (2023-04-14 19:56:59+00:00): And why are you creating crosswalks as footways (e.g. w1125535216, w1125535217, w1125535229)? They should be footway=crossing and 
highway=footway
dru1138 (2023-04-15 02:50:55+00:00): Hi Scott, thanks for all the questions. Sidewalks such as w131818344 (Way:Tukey's Bridge Sidewalk) are generally tagged as Footways, not paths. I tagged it as bicycle=no because there are signs that say bicycles are not allowed at either end of the walkway. I cannot answer your question about w1125535205 because you have already deleted the way so I do not know what it was. I hope you have a great weekend!
Warmly,
Drew
scotteaton92 (2023-04-15 12:29:27+00:00): That was not a foot way that was a path. The no. Bicycle sign is for the highway on ramp. Not for the path. Also, if you looked at the way you would see that it was already tagged in a bicycle relation. The ways that I deleted were going underneath the north side of tukeys bridge. There is no path there.
tastrax (2023-02-03 05:08:13+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code 
+61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX
as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features  - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
nevw (2022-12-29 20:08:38+00:00): Hi
There are a few errors in the multipolygons. You may need to refer to the wiki.
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=153.08750&lat=-26.68750&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways
mavl (2023-04-25 08:59:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
h551w (2022-12-29 05:51:09+00:00): Survey and GPS only apply to north of Ustick. I also only added proposed roads through to phase 2, since the next phase will presumably only begin once everything here has finished construction
mavl (2023-04-25 09:08:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 08:59:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
Mathias_ADAV (2023-08-10 14:26:41+00:00): Bonjour, vous avez modifé la rue Raspail en shared_lane au lieu de Opposite_lane. La vraie valeur est bien Opposite_lane dans ce type de cas, merci de vous référer au wiki : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bicycle

Bon mapping !
Mathias
user_10241830 (2022-12-29 06:58:51+00:00): Hallo,

die Buchtruhe ist schon auf der anderen Straßenseite eingezeichnet (in der Eschersheimer Landstraße 182). Sicher, dass die Buchtruhe hier ist?
rehmaster (2022-12-29 08:27:25+00:00): Hallo,
ja, der Besitzer hat einen neuen Laden aufgemacht. Der Laden auf der Eschersheimer Landstraße 182 heißt auch Spieltruhe und Buchtruhe.
Der neue, weitere Laden ist in den Räumlichkeiten des Starbucks, der vorher im Grünhofcenter war.
NorthCrab (2022-12-29 14:10:27+00:00): Witaj, poprosiliście o weryfikację.

https://i.imgur.com/IOigxzR.png
Nie ignoruj uwag edytora, w tym przypadku narysowana przez ciebie linia nie łączyła się z żadną inną i była praktycznie niewykorzystywana przez system nawigacyjny.

Poprawiłem twoją zmianę i możesz zobaczyć jak połączyłem chodnik z przecinającymi się dróżkami.

Pozdrawiam!
Michał Widera (2022-12-29 14:35:58+00:00): Ok dziękuje za sugestie!
Faktycznie linia nie była połączona oraz nie wiedziałem jak wykonać przejścia dla pieszych, ale już widzę jak zostało 
Również pozdrawiam
ALu68 (2022-12-29 07:55:30+00:00): The memorial exists already here:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9811875109
silversurfer83 (2022-12-29 17:48:28+00:00): "fixed" it
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/130656775
NorthCrab (2022-12-29 14:20:24+00:00): Witaj, dlaczego garaż ma duplikację adresu z domu? Na ewidencji adresowej nie ma tam takiego adresu, już prędzej coś w stylu 5A :P.
Pozdrawiam!
ivanbranco (2022-12-29 10:03:05+00:00): As per:

* user_blocks/6324
* changeset/125613627
* changeset/125410599
* changeset/130123907
* changeset/130160551

I reverted this edit.
user_13865352 (2023-01-02 14:42:15+00:00): Try this instead of vandalising this map: https://opengeofiction.net
Fizzie-DWG (2023-01-02 23:56:22+00:00): User blocked.
Graeme Fitzpatrick
OSMF Data Working Group
DavidKarlas (2022-12-29 09:01:10+00:00): These changes broke 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6556967
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6558160
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6557148
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6557244

could you try fixing it?

Thank you
eggie (2022-12-29 08:33:12+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback...  Vaak moeten woningen nog worden ingemeten..  Wanneer iets nog niet klopt svp doorgeven aan het Kadaster anders komt bij herimport de oude vorm weer terug.
Dat kan hier
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=onze%20lieve%20vrouwestraat%201&resultOffset=0&objectId=1734207000133436&geometry.x=180353.261&geometry.y=441378.11000042&zoomlevel=7&detailsObjectId=1734016000003348

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
JCx5 (2022-12-29 08:37:47+00:00): Thx!
eggie (2022-12-29 08:39:25+00:00): Dag JC  Dan nog wel even de regel construction=house verwijderen svp.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-12-29 08:40:12+00:00): en hier construction=yes verwijderen.
Het is immers opgeleverd.
eggie (2022-12-29 12:32:46+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
NorthCrab (2022-12-29 13:56:42+00:00): Witaj, poprosiliście o weryfikację.

Usunąłem z drogi ten dziwny zawijas na końcu ponieważ wygląda to jak błąd. Nie wyobrażam sobie aby na końcu znajdowało się takie aka. rondo o tak ostrych kątach zakrętu.

Pozdrawiam!
NorthCrab (2022-12-29 14:24:22+00:00): Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1125562308
Tego typu parkingi oznaczamy street-side parking a nie parking lot. Parking lot to duży parking z wewnętrznymi uliczkami parkingowymi (np. przy większych sklepach). Pojedyncze pasy miejsc parkingowych przy drodze to street-side.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1125562306
area:highway to sposób mikro-mapowania dróg *w dodatku* do klasycznie poprowadzonej linii. Aplikacje nawigacyjne nie poprowadzą bo tego typu obszarze, jest to wyłącznie dodatek wizualny. Dokumentacja: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:area:highway

Pozdrawiam!
NorthCrab (2022-12-29 14:27:24+00:00): Witaj,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1017337804
Format service_times jest niepoprawny i niezostanie on zrozumiany przez żadną aplikację. Proszę przeczytaj dokumentację tego tagu na https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:service%20times która wspomina o takim samym formacie co https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours.

Przydatne narzędzie do walidacji formatu godzin:
https://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/

Pozdrawiam!
Syl (2023-02-12 15:57:47+00:00): Bonjour, après un passage sur place je viens de corriger à nouveau l'emplacement de l'arrêt.
Je suis en train de réfléchir à faire un signalement de votre compte vu qu'apparemment il n'est pas possible d'adapter vos outils pour ne plus écraser les améliorations faites entre deux imports (même quand la dernière vient de vous comme c'est le cas ici).
bradrh (2023-01-01 01:46:47+00:00): In the future, plz confine your changesets to a smaller area.  this one goes from the california to TX
dusaipra (2023-01-03 06:00:13+00:00): Hello,

Thank you for reviewing my changeset and highlighting the issue. We always confine our edits to small geographical location and this is an honest mistake from our end. Going ahead, we will ensure not to repeat such errors again. We are looking forward to learn more from you.

Regards,
Dusaipra
goldfndr (2022-12-29 14:00:49+00:00): Way 937985511 should be split further, as some segments are on bridges and should have layer tag.
Enock4seth (2022-12-29 15:12:21+00:00): Hi.
Kindly add useful text before those hashtags, this text should tell briefly what you mapped. eg. add buildings.

Read about Good changeset comments here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Happy mapping!
NorthCrab (2022-12-29 13:52:34+00:00): Witaj na OpenStreetMap!
Poprosiliście o weryfikację.

Proszę uważaj aby nie dodawać zbędnych tagów dostępowych do dróg. Domyślne dostępy w Polsce:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Poland

Pozdrawiam!
NorthCrab (2022-12-29 15:27:12+00:00): Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Czy ta restauracja obejmuje cały budynek? Jak tak to przeniosę oznaczenie na cały obszar a nie tylko na punkt :P

Pozdrawiam!
Piotr Strębski (2023-07-27 11:13:06+00:00): Czemu przeniosłeś tym zestawem zmian restaurację z Warszawy???
Piotr Strębski (2023-07-27 11:15:28+00:00): @NorthCrab - już rozumiesz czemu nie uzyskałeś odpowiedzi na swoje pytanie. Ta zmiana to forma (świadomego lub nie) wandalizmu.
NorthCrab (2023-07-27 11:51:57+00:00): Bardziej słabo zrobione apki mobilne, gdzie łatwo jest cokolwiek wysłać a jak ktoś odpisze to słuch zaginął.
Piotr Strębski (2023-09-05 13:02:34+00:00): poprawiłem, jest znowu w Warszawie...
NorthCrab (2023-09-05 13:14:59+00:00): Dzięki
jeslop (2022-12-29 12:18:34+00:00): Hola Sergi G, bienvenido a OSM. Este bar que marcas no se puede ver en las imágenes de satélite ni en catastro. ¿Alguna fuente para esta información? Parece un descampado utilizado como aparcamiento.

Saludos

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
Sergi G (2022-12-29 14:43:35+00:00): Hola Jesús, gracias por la bienvenida.
Es un autobar, efectivamente está estacionado en un descampado
jeslop (2022-12-29 21:57:04+00:00): Perfecto, gracias por la información.

Saludos,

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group