piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
kuhni74 (2024-07-31 09:53:21+00:00): der Abschnitt https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/708217172 scheint in https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17892836 noch zu fehlen? Oder verläuft das anders?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-08 10:42:23+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1304799849 - czy w terenie pozostały jakiekolwiek pozostałości tych torów?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-13 05:23:56+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1304799852/history -  a tych?
eggie (2024-07-31 10:06:15+00:00): Bert   Ik heb je aanwijzing met name= weer verwijderd. Dit soort teksten willen we niet zien in OSM. 
Bij het hek heb ik de weg gesplitst.
Het gedeelte Havenweg naar 27 staat nu op  permissive.
Er is geen hek. Staat er een bord Eigenweg?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-07-31 10:08:11+00:00): Je splitsen was overigens wel gelukt. Ik heb op het hek gesplitst.
Zag niet dat je al gesplitst had.
Niet te snel iets op private zetten. Het moet wel aangegeven staan en afgesloten.
Hulpdiensten maken ook gebruik van OSM. 
Groet
eggie
dadybydy23 (2024-08-20 07:46:50+00:00): تمپریکس
kuhni74 (2024-07-31 10:01:05+00:00): Vielen Dank! Dem Weg 2 fehlt noch ein Teil in Niederrain?
kuhni74 (2024-07-31 10:08:38+00:00): und gibt es nicht auch noch wo eine Nr.10?
kuhni74 (2024-07-31 10:10:06+00:00): und 12?
Stefan_89 (2024-07-31 10:43:07+00:00): Das fehlende Stück werde ich hinzufügen.

Route 10 gibt es, jedoch lt. Karte nicht hier. Und 12 ist im Plan nicht eingezeichnet:

https://www.lungau.at/fileadmin/user_upload/Typisch_Lungau/Orte/Allgemein/Flyer/Nordic_Walking-komprimiert-1-2-1-komprimiert_compressed.pdf
eggie (2024-08-01 09:50:46+00:00): Dag Geppy.. Je vraagt feedback  
Ziet er logisch uit, maarrrrrrrr... 
Het is maar de vraag of er eenrichtingsverkeer geldt op dat 'rondje' . Bewoners van nr 7 zouden dan helemaal rond moeten op dat parkeerplaatsje. 
Dat zullen ze niet doen, want er zijn geen dwingende pijlen en het is ook geen rotonde in de zin van. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-08-01 09:53:38+00:00): Voor bezorgdiensten is het handig als een Eigenweg op access=permissive staat ipv =private
Nu routeert het niet voor PostNL, DHL enz. 
We zijn wat behoudender geworden met dat private dat niet routeert.
Ik haal oneway=yes even weg hier.. Mocht er een bord met eenrichting zijn gekomen laat het maar weten. 
Groet
eggie
eggie (2024-07-31 10:11:38+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-07-31 10:15:23+00:00): Adresgegevens verwijderd
eggie (2024-07-31 10:12:58+00:00): Dag LHD  Svp geen adresgegevens bijtaggen op de gebouwomtrekken. Er zijn al adresnodes.

MVG
eggie
LHD&W (2024-07-31 10:15:24+00:00): Duidelijk, dank voor de reactie.
eggie (2024-07-31 10:18:45+00:00): No problem..
De naam van het gebouw komt wel veel voor nu.
Lastig op te lossen voor een starter.

Mapse
eggie
Nathan_A_RF (2024-07-31 19:44:20+00:00): Hi, when changing maxspeed tags, be sure to a) check you're using miles per hour in your tags, and b) ensure you remove maxspeed:type tags that do not fit the new maxspeed tag you are applying
4004 (2024-07-31 19:47:57+00:00): thanks for fixing, I was batch editing in iD so missed some of those points
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-11-26 13:17:43+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12084893660/history has nature = tree that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
Was it supposed to be natural=tree? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dtree (though maybe it is not a tree anymore?)
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-11-26 13:19:12+00:00): it was sharing location with https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12084904388 so I removed it
datagistips (2024-11-26 14:10:50+00:00): That's right : natural=tree
datagistips (2024-11-26 14:10:57+00:00): Thanks !
Frans S (2024-07-31 13:24:05+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 

Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
In general fair mapped.

C: Collecting adjacent buildings and mapped is as 1 building.
H: Included a yard of clearing.


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154641839
user_11609320 (2024-07-31 10:30:07+00:00): one of the photos on 
https://www.jt4llc.com/what-we-do/nevada-test-and-training-range-nttr/

mentions Tolicha Peak Electronic Combat Range
user_11609320 (2024-07-31 11:11:29+00:00): this shows location of Tolicha Peak Electronic Combat Range
https://static.e-publishing.af.mil/production/1/nellisafb/publication/afi13-212v1_accsup_nttrsup_add_a/afman13-212v1_nttr_add_a.pdf
SomeoneElse (2024-07-31 22:57:26+00:00): Perhaps the easiest way to upload a picture as a source is to add a note with StreetComplete https://streetcomplete.app/ and record a picture at the same time.  Then reference the note in the changeset comment.  When you resolve the note, StreetComplete will delete the picture.
AntMadeira (2024-07-31 11:19:38+00:00): Olá, JCT03.
Vejo que criaste um estádio em Fátima, mas o nome entre parêntesis deveria ir para a etiqueta alt_name=*. Na etiqueta name=* deve ficar apenas o principal, nunca dois nomes.

Cumprimentos,
António Madeira.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154642096
busnotturno95 (2024-07-31 11:40:52+00:00): Suddivisa la linea z208 in relazioni di andata e di ritorno per ciascuno dei percorsi effettuati (Monza - Arcore e Monza - Villasanta) e contestuale aggiunta delle fermate in zona San Fruttuoso; correzioni ai nomi delle fermate già presenti.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-07-31 23:14:16+00:00): Please don't add duplicate ways
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154642371
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-07-31 23:14:47+00:00): reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154671026
rab (2024-08-03 15:28:17+00:00): chikosa mini Hospital should be here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1127591826
The coordinates can be seen on the pictures
https://zambia.builttocare.com/northern-province/
Marek-M (2024-07-31 12:04:10+00:00): Cześć, czy te drogi:
https://www.sm.org/way/332257113
https://www.osm.org/way/332257111
nie są już oznakowane znakami C-13+C-16 w taki sposób jak w Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Rowery#Drogi_dla_pieszych_i_rowerów ?

Jeżeli te znaki dalej tam stoją, to otagowanie `highway=path` było poprawne.
Anas masuris (2024-08-02 08:14:35+00:00): Hej, mam kilka uwag do edycji:

1) Jeśli nanosisz punkt posterunku zapowiadawczego czy przystanku, to nigdy nie powinien on być węzłem na torze, tylko obok, jako osobny punkt
2) Jeśli posterunek jest nieczynny, wystarczy do niego dodać przedrostek disused: np. disused:railway=halt. Nie należy dodawać pod tzw. render railway=site, by się wyświetlało na mapie
eggie (2024-07-31 11:05:54+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
silversurfer83 (2024-07-31 21:50:05+00:00): Hi there :)

thanks for contributing to OSM.

I'd like to point you towards https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours
You'll also find links to tools which help with the syntax.

happy mapping
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154642762
osmguy0815 (2024-08-04 15:30:10+00:00): Thanks for the tip, I already knew this site. I just slipped into the German days of the week for the Volksbank. Thanks for catching that.
bxl-forever (2024-07-31 14:21:31+00:00): This changeset creates duplicates of existing objects.

You added this fuel station twice, once as a node and once as an area
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12084945094
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/272866052

Also, there was a fuel station here (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/255657485) and this changeset added a copy of all tags—creating a duplicate—here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/272885848

With respect, this will not make OpenStreetMap better.
bxl-forever (2024-07-31 14:25:29+00:00): Your changeset mixes changes in England and in Romania.

Instead of uploading them all at once, it is better to upload changes only for one area, and only then start working on another part of the globe.

Please read some guidelines here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
CocolinoFan (2024-07-31 19:53:57+00:00): Understood.
woodpeck_repair (2024-08-23 20:35:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 155671657 where the changeset comment is: revert hotel edits that were adding 3rd party web sites and affiliate links
eggie (2024-07-31 11:13:07+00:00): Dag mx  Dit gaat gewoon routeren om het paaltje heen. Is dat de bedoeling?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-07-31 11:18:32+00:00): access=private toevoegen?
hoserab (2024-07-31 16:16:39+00:00): Hello feathered_ouul,

I noticed you've made a number of changes across Western Canada recently, with the changeset comment as per above: "A number of node changes."

Can you please be more specific? At a cursory glance you seem to be making changes such as adding or fixing wikidata tags to businesses, updating bus stop tags and the like, but also many changes to areas & ways (e.g. buildings & pedestrian crossings) which aren't immediately clear.

Thanks!
marc__marc (2024-09-25 08:59:23+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1304811620
je te conseille survey:date pour mémoriser le survey, c'est plus facile à retrouver + tard que de parser le tag source pour y trouver toutes les variantes de mots décrivant la même chose.
Cordialement,
Marc
Adrian 2 (2024-09-30 22:25:04+00:00): Oui, en principe. Malheureusement, n'importe comment on le fait, ça ne marche pas très bien, parce que souvent on ne met pas à jour les balises (tags) source, survey:date, etc., quand les autres contributeurs viennent modifier l'objet.

Dans ce cas-ci, ce n'est pas un objet susceptible à changer bientôt. J'ai mis la date du relevé parce que rien n'était visible dans les images aériennes, pour éviter que l'objet soit supprimé par un cartographe depuis son fauteuil. Peut-être deux semaines après, de nouvelles images sont arrivées et le bâtiment était là!
marc__marc (2024-10-01 12:02:01+00:00): Merci pour ton retour.
Je comprend tout a fait, je pense justement proposer qu'une modification d'un objet ayant un survey:date récent provoque une popup d'info si l'imagerie est + ancienne.
mais pour cela il faut un moyen de détecter l'age de la dernière vue sur le terrain même si cette information n'est pour l'instant mise à jour que manuellement
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-07-10 18:10:49+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12084923911/history has historic = 2009 that was added in this edit
What this tag means? Numeric value is unexpected here and it is unclear what it means
8as71 (2025-07-10 18:38:05+00:00): 2009 is the date the seedling started to grow at home. 2012 is the date the seedling was planted infront of the Darwineum.
eggie (2024-07-31 11:08:31+00:00): Dag Ron  De amenity=school met naam en adresnode heb ik voorlopig verwijderd.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-07-31 11:30:55+00:00): De school heb ik (tijdelijk) verplaatst naar de adresnode Anna Paulownastraat 8
Groet
eggie
uprkos (2026-02-06 17:17:32+00:00): Zapytanie jest:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5155328
YomanNH (2026-02-06 18:32:18+00:00): Tradycyjnie utworzona uwaga, zamiast zapytać autora...
Ale widzę, że to nie moja sprawka. Yunkers usunął połączenie z Al. Powstańców Śląskich z jednej strony, a z drugiej zmienił drogę na highway=path: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176351715
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=176351715
jefle (2024-09-05 05:32:50+00:00): Do we really need relation 17893356 created in this changeset? This relation's tags look like a country boundary, but its only member (way 10662797) already belongs to relation 287072 (Uruguay country boundary).
osminng (2024-09-05 12:56:25+00:00): Hello jefle,

It was added as a relation, seen as a practice in some countries, that even relatively small islands (without further elements, e.g. landuse multipolygons inside) were rather treated as island multipolygons.

But after multipolygonizing several such islands, this practice was rather discouraged by other mappers. 

I think the guideline shall be the multipolygon and place=island documentation of OSM wiki. It is not 100% black & white in this question. But whatever applies better to this island, it can be applied so.
dktue (2024-10-04 21:12:30+00:00): Some relations are tagged with admin_level=2 which is wrong, as they do not represent countries.
muralito (2025-09-01 20:03:17+00:00): Deleted https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17893356
muralito (2025-09-01 20:07:45+00:00): The problem as jeffle and dktue said, was not that the island/islet was a multipolygon, the problem was that this relation was an admin_level 2 boundary.
lonvia (2026-01-02 15:25:37+00:00): I've removed https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17893357, https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17893358 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17893359  so that these islands stop being their own country. I've moved the tags back to the way, so no information should be lost.
eggie (2024-07-31 11:20:46+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Filip009 (2024-09-09 18:14:14+00:00): Neotagovaná way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1304815519
*Martin* (2024-09-10 06:50:32+00:00): fixed
JeanQuiRitLaNouille (2024-07-31 19:56:11+00:00): Sorry, dashed lane on this road...
eggie (2024-07-31 20:07:23+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Hufkratzer (2024-07-31 21:41:40+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1304817980 ist keine Reitanlage (leisure=horse_riding); nach den Luftbildern könnte es eine überdachte Führanlage ein.
Siehe
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:animal=horse_walker
und
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure=horse_riding
geo_thom (2024-08-02 18:26:48+00:00): Hallo und danke für den Hinweis, hab es in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154748737 angepasst. Hatte in den JOSM Vorlagen bisschen rumgesucht aber scheinbar nicht das richtige Wort dafür gefunden, da ich die genauen Begrifflichkeiten nicht kannte.
Hufkratzer (2024-08-02 19:50:40+00:00): Ja, das ist auch in den JOSM Presets nicht drin; in iD auch noch nicht.
rskedgell (2024-07-31 12:49:32+00:00): This was already tagged correctly as motor_vehicle=private + private=residents

There is no *public* access for motor vehicles, but some motor vehicles not covered by other access tags are permitted to use it, specifically: A1 access permit holders and refuse collection vehicles.

It helps to read the traffic order in order to understand road restrictions, as these are usually published in The Gazette under the OpenStreetMap-compatible Open Government Licence.

The initial traffic order was The Newham (Prescribed Route) (No. 1) Experimental Traffic Order 2019, which I believe has now been made permanent.
https://www.thegazette.co.uk/notice/3347560
CrisR87 (2024-07-31 11:51:31+00:00): Zeitungsbericht mit 12ft.io entsperren -> 
https://www.ovb-online.de/muehldorf/waldkraiburg/waldkraiburg-wo-sind-die-grenzen-fuer-die-nachverdichtung-93021376.html
eggie (2024-07-31 12:26:43+00:00): Top!
FahrradstadtAachen (2024-08-01 19:06:48+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OSM!

Du hattest bei dieser Fläche https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/97936424 als Namen irrtümlich eine E-Mail-Adresse eingetragen. Ich habe den fehlerhaften Namen wieder gelöscht. Änderungen bitte zukünftig sorgfältig vornehmen.

Wenn Du Fragen hast oder Hilfe brauchst - auch hinsichtlich der Radservice-Stationen -, kannst Du gerne auf mich zukommen.

Viele Grüße!
eggie (2024-08-01 11:39:50+00:00): Dag Geppy   Kleine stukjes groen vallen niet onder de definitie van leisure=park
De leisure=park is een functie.. De landuse=grass is wat je ziet.
Echte parken zijn groter en liggen over water bos en gras heen als een transparant.
Ik vult hier even de landuse in. 
MVG
eggie
ivanbranco (2024-08-03 21:35:44+00:00): Is it really open 24/7?
Also, is this a real place? There's no mention of Morsott in the linked website
SomeoneElse (2024-08-03 22:11:40+00:00): Likely just spam - the typos on their "top noch website" (sic) suggest so.
mavl (2024-08-07 11:02:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 154930045 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16542].
mavl (2024-08-07 11:02:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 154930045 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16542].
Romwriter (2024-07-31 14:42:01+00:00): Hallo geozeisig, ich kann diesen Änderungssatz nachvollziehen. Ein aussagekräftiger Changeset-Kommentar hätte mir dabei sehr geholfen. Vgl. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments Beste Grüße, Romwriter
R_A (2024-08-14 10:29:10+00:00): "Saaleradweg/ Aue Orlamünde" ist kein Name, sondern eine Beschreibung.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen#name_ist_nur_der_Name
Auch wenn das für die Rettungsleitstelle einfacher ist, sie hat nicht das Recht "offizielle" Namen zu vergeben.
bxl-forever (2024-07-31 14:15:46+00:00): Hello,

Even if you know the area, I am not sure you mapped it correctly. ;-)  Allow me to make a few comments here, I hope they will be useful.

Here is just one example, for this footway:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1304831422

1. Names are (official) names only and should not be added for mere descriptions → "House 3 and 5 garden access" is a description.

2. "access=private" is enough to restrict access.  Once this tag is set, it automatically applies to all modes of transport → please do not add "bicycle=private", "horse=private".  Also, since this is a footway, this is de facto a way solely for pedestrians, therefore "motor_vehicle=no" was already implied.  It is not useful to repeat default values on every object, as that just makes the situation more confused for other people.

3. The way you mapped this footway makes it look like a tunnel *under* the house.  I have no local knowledge about this area but it looks very much like a mistake.  A very common situation with beginners is to click on the tunnel or layer options in the online editor to get rid of validator warnings alerting you about a footway crossing a house.  Do I understand that this footway goes *across* the building instead of being dug *under* it, right?  Or maybe that houses 3 and 5 do not touch and that the footway is between them?  I will be happy to fix it for you because it is complicated to explain briefly how to do it.

Happy mapping.
CocolinoFan (2024-07-31 19:51:18+00:00): Thank you so much for taking the time!
I have fixed 1 and 2 makes sense, thank you for letting me know.
For point 3, is a tunnel alleyway under the second floor of house 5. What is your Discord username? I will message you an image of the "tunnel"
bxl-forever (2024-07-31 20:23:32+00:00): You are welcome. I saw your other changes and making it a tunnel=building_passage is good.  I only had to make a minor fix (splitting the footway where it intersects the house, so that the part with tunnel=building_passage is strictly inside the building).
You look like a fast learner, it’s good.
No need to send a picture of this place, I trust you.

Just one more thing: make sure to write realistic changeset titles when you upload something, i.e. explain in a few words what your change is about (e.g. "updated a few businesses in my area", "added more houses"), not "Work Work Work" or emojis.

Happy mapping!
CocolinoFan (2024-07-31 20:28:50+00:00): Understood.
Thank you again <3
Frans S (2024-07-31 12:51:45+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping. 
A remark. Please follow the taggings as described in this wiki.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India/Tags/Highway
Inside farmland, just giving access to farmland, rivers and woods. use the tag 'track'when no buildings are alongside this road.
Best regards
Geo-Tobi (2024-10-03 05:54:25+00:00): Hier wurde surface asphalt gesetzt, aber tracktype auf grade2 belassen. Absicht?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/168201199
NorthCrab_upload (2024-07-31 13:20:24+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2289958140
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1106380487

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Geo-Tobi (2024-10-03 05:56:04+00:00): Surface fine_gravel, aver tracktype grade1, das passt nicht zusammen.
Bvmz (2024-10-08 18:16:46+00:00): aus dem Zug sah das ziemlich eben und komfortabel aus
Geo-Tobi (2024-10-08 18:55:50+00:00): Das glaub ich dir auf's Wort. Allerdings, tracktype grade1 wäre Oberfläche versiegelt, gemäß Wiki. Fine_gravel ist maximal grade2. Nebenbei: Ich würde wohl auch eher compacted setzen, das ist gemäß Wiki die beste "unpaved" Oberfläche. Könntest du das nach den Wiki Regeln korrigieren/optimieren?
pitscheplatsch (2024-08-03 15:54:16+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154723774
Weft (2024-10-16 06:50:28+00:00): Bonjour,
Pourquoi avoir supprimé l’accessibilité vélo sur le chemin 54065530 ?
Merci
Tomas_J (2024-07-31 13:28:35+00:00): Zdravim, pro info  obecny název (ww2) nepatří do tagu name.
marczoutendijk (2024-10-08 18:34:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 157641048 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of a great number of benches
marczoutendijk (2024-10-08 18:34:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 157641048 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of a great number of benches
marczoutendijk (2024-10-08 18:34:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 157641048 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of a great number of benches
Mirosław Żylewicz (2024-08-06 19:05:38+00:00): To już nie jest plac budowy.

"Zaglądamy do nowo wybudowanego Zespołu Szkolno-Przedszkolnego dla 1200 dzieci przy ulicy Cynamonowej, gdzie już 2 września rozpoczęcie roku szkolnego. Szkoła jest już prawie gotowa...

W tej chwili trwają ostatnie PRACE ZWIĄZANE Z MONTOWANIEM WYPOSAŻENIA ORAZ DROBNE PRACE POPRAWKOWE. Szykujemy się do odbiorów technicznych. Przed nami jeszcze generalne sprzątanie i meblowania poszczególnych pomieszczeń..."

Źródło:
Zarząd Inwestycji Miejskich we Wrocławiu
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/V5xsnn5BoXGtQykz/
maro21 (2024-08-08 20:57:27+00:00): A czy ja gdzieś dodałem plac budowy?
Mirosław Żylewicz (2024-08-12 20:01:40+00:00): Może źle się wyraziłem. Czy przedrostki "construction" są zasadne w tym przypadku?

construction:amenity=school
construction:grades=P,1-8
maro21 (2024-08-19 21:38:58+00:00): Tak, bo szkoła jeszcze nie działa. A start_date nie może być przyszłą datą.
Pilsetkartetajs (2025-01-12 11:40:55+00:00): Sveiki, te drīzāk domāts surface=sand?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1304841408