piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2025-07-27 14:55:09+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-07-28 06:47:43+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/169594055
jeslop (2025-07-27 16:42:24+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169569339
AndreaDp271 (2025-07-28 09:17:35+00:00): Thank you for your contribution but try to make smaller changeset areas. Thank you. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169563391
NeisBot (2025-07-27 15:09:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-07-28 06:46:18+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/169594018
M!dgard (2025-07-27 15:09:34+00:00): Wat betekent 2014-18?
kabelhaai (2025-07-27 15:12:12+00:00): Staat op een bord voor de kapel. Geen inscription, maar heeft er wel *iets* mee te maken. De rest van de tekst was niet leesbaar.
felipeeugenio (2025-07-27 15:07:16+00:00): Note	Contributor	Tmstmp UTC	Action	Comment
4875592 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-07-27 17:06	closed	ok.
4875593 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-07-27 17:06	closed	ok.
4875594 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-07-27 17:06	closed	dejé con 1234 el resto de los blocks. No sé si está ok.
4875595 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-07-27 17:06	closed	ok.
4875590 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-07-27 17:05	closed	ok. Puse con ese número los dos blocks mas cerca, los otros los dejé con 1234.
Lisapple (2025-08-06 14:06:20+00:00): Merci elandreau pour la contribution mais le Phare du bout du monde existe déjà (way/130309832).
Si le lighthouse n'apparaît dans CoMaps puisque c'est un way, il est préférable de le signaler à CoMaps.
Cordialement.
elandreau (2025-08-07 13:44:00+00:00): Merci Lisapple.
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2025-07-28 17:45:33+00:00): This changeset had been fully reverted by another mapper in osm.org/changeset/169621588
and I've leave comment under osm.org/changeset/169589142

This comment only act as a notice for future mapper who want to find what happen and whether any handling was conducted.
felipeeugenio (2025-07-27 15:16:23+00:00): Note	Contributor	Tmstmp UTC	Action	Comment
4876838 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-07-27 17:14	closed	ok.. Supuse que es el que se desprende del camino proncipal
4876839 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-07-27 17:14	closed	ok..
4876664 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-07-27 17:13	closed	ok..
4876826 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-07-27 17:13	closed	ok..
4876840 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-07-27 17:13	closed	ok..
4876841 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-07-27 17:13	closed	ok..
4876666 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-07-27 17:13	closed	ok..
4876828 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-07-27 17:13	closed	ok..
4875592 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-07-27 17:06	closed	ok.
4875593 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-07-27 17:06	closed	ok.
4875594 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-07-27 17:06	closed	dejé con 1234 el resto de los blocks. No sé si está ok.
4875595 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-07-27 17:06	closed	ok.
4875590 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-07-27 17:05	closed	ok. Puse con ese número los dos blocks mas cerca, los otros los dejé con 1234.
habi (2025-11-10 08:11:40+00:00): Ciao GPSPython
Die Bank heisst ziemlich sicher nicht so, oder?
Mit amenity=bench ist das Ding erstmals gut erfasst, ich habe das so geändert.
Gruss,
habi
habi (2025-11-10 08:12:21+00:00): Ciao GPSPython
Der Mülleimer ist ein Mülleimer und heisst nicht so.
Mit amenity=waste_basket ist das Ding erstmals gut erfasst, ich habe das so geändert.
Gruss,
habi
Leo Slager (2025-07-28 10:36:49+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
user_5359 (2025-07-27 15:28:44+00:00): error correction: Correct name notation
Aleks-Berlin (2025-07-29 15:47:17+00:00): Hi Op'tRad,
please write wikipedia="nl:Abcde" not "http..". Please read
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikipedia#Examples
Thx, Alex
Op'tRad (2025-07-30 08:59:52+00:00): Thank you Alex,
OSM mapping is a learning proces ...
Greetings,
Werner
NeisBot (2025-07-27 15:40:34+00:00): Hi Coco0409, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 81% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 46 building(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=169565787
Coco0409 (2025-07-27 16:40:25+00:00): Hi, for an update of the Chad map for a project of Medecin Sans Frontières, we have to delete buildings that no longer exist and create new ones for building that are not referenced. So, its not a mistake if i deleted a lot of buildings.
NeisReview (2025-07-28 06:31:46+00:00): Thank you for your private message and confirming that your deletions were intentional.
bxl-forever (2025-07-27 15:51:11+00:00): For those who wonder what this giant "no comment" changeset is: It includes geometry changes to buildings in both Sao Paulo (Brazil) and Chemnitz (Germany).
AndreaDp271 (2025-07-28 09:18:51+00:00): Thank you for your contribution but try to make smaller changeset areas. Thank you. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169566137
csomerville (2025-10-01 16:52:12+00:00): Was this series of changes discussed anywhere? What width rule are you referring to? I wonder if you're misinterpreting that guidance to classify a waterway less than 3 meters in width as a stream as always classify waterways with widths larger as a river.
kaleidoscopica (2025-10-01 18:28:33+00:00): From the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Dstream - "the commonly accepted rule for OpenStreetMap is that a stream can be jumped across by an active, able-bodied person". I would guess that around 99% (maybe 99.9%) of named waterways in Texas should actually be classed as "rivers" on OSM. In contrast, "streams" are small enough that they are not typically visible via satellite/aerial imagery, and rarely mapped as they require firsthand, in-person knowledge. 

I realize this may be counterintuitive, in part because what we refer to outside OSM as a "river" is quite different, but it is the long-established rule.
csomerville (2025-10-01 18:47:02+00:00): I believe you are misunderstanding that guidance. It is not saying that a waterbody larger than 3 meters should be a river.  It is saying anything less should be tagged a stream. It isn't an upper limit on stream but a lower limit on river. Most waterways or roughly half in OSM tagged river are at least 10 meters wide.
csomerville (2025-10-01 18:54:24+00:00): To be clear, I'm open to possibility that I don't have it quite right either. But if I was working on this the fact that I was having to go change so many complete waterways that a conversation might be warranted and to verify the wiki still represents the consensus.
kaleidoscopica (2025-10-01 19:35:07+00:00): (Messaged in Slack, to have more room to type/open up better further discussion)
Kádár Iván (2025-07-28 13:33:27+00:00): Ez konkrétan a kerékpárút. Az 57 új pályája a régi mellett megy közvetlenül (a régi, elbontott kerékpárút helyén):
https://magyarepitok.hu/utepites/2025/07/kirajzolodott-a-mohacsi-duna-hidhoz-epulo-ut-nyomvonala-merfoldkohoz-kozelit-a-mederpiller
Bálint (2025-07-28 13:55:34+00:00): Szia, frissítettem a kép alapján. Az aszfaltozott kétsávos 57-es fut bele az épülő körforgalomba, a kerékpárút pedig mellette fut.
MassCartog (2025-07-27 20:04:14+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM! Next time, instead of removing mis-tagged data, just update the type. Not everything is tagged correctly in OSM, but fixing the feature should be the first step, rather than removing it. Thanks!
aceman444 (2026-01-31 11:08:24+00:00): Hi, what kind of correction is this? "website:2" key? The website wiki page mentions "website:1" if you want to go that way. "website:brand" definitely seemed better as a way to mark how the brand network references this pharmacy.
Darkfoe703 (2025-07-27 22:15:54+00:00): Creación de nodo correspondiente a restarurante "Camarón Bombay"
Taya_S (2025-07-27 17:31:02+00:00): Reverted vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169571735
osmmapper222 (2025-07-27 16:47:45+00:00): Der Benutzer ist den OSM-Admins wegen Vandalismus bereits gemeldet.
Taya_S (2025-07-27 17:31:39+00:00): Reverted vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169571753
NorthCrab_upload (2025-07-27 16:41:07+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/947219697

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
SekeRob (2025-07-27 16:46:20+00:00): 'Unfortunately', this edit set did not cause a huge BBox so it would pop into many editors CS history view.

For the attentive reader. There's many gaps in SS16 route relation now almost 45000 members. My thinking is to split the relation per region, better stiil per province and combine these in a superroute same as the Appennino Bike Tour is split in 45 stages, so an edit to a stage does not need to load the whole to find the gaps, nor breaks the whole when something goes wrong.

I'd be happy to start along the Abruzzo coast which would constitute about 3 sub-routes for Teramo, Pescara and Chieti (don't think any dir touches on L'Aquila..

Just a thought....(not holding me breath).
ivanbranco (2026-02-01 12:31:50+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/26957948
lit=solid_line

Is supposed to be divider=solid_line? or just a typo to be deleted?

thanks and good mapping
lottie1040 (2025-08-20 14:52:01+00:00): Hi Simon, I've retagged this as "historic building" because it's not been an actual pub for years, but it historically was one, and the architecture is notable. The White House Kitchen, which currently occupies the building, is tagged separately. Thanks
swup0 (2025-07-27 20:58:03+00:00): Hi! There is already a node for Hulen.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1843673503
VolkerNO (2025-07-27 21:03:35+00:00): Yeah, you're right, I was zoomed in too far already and didn't see the other one :-D I'll merge them (new location is correct). Thanks!
swup0 (2025-07-27 21:05:40+00:00): It actually has two entrances. Unless something has changed, and I recall correctly, what you have marked is the backstage entrance.
VolkerNO (2025-07-27 21:11:49+00:00): Yikes, let me see how I roll this back...
fluffycupcakes (2025-07-28 06:18:57+00:00): Correction: the roof color was added to "Лукашово-2" buildings, not "Лукашово-3"
WebbieDK (2025-11-19 07:39:39+00:00): Hvorfor har Mørkhøj vej (Fra nr 184 til 186) et vejnavn, men de andre små stikveje er blot service roads? Der mangler en rød tråd omkring disse veje.
osmviborg (2025-11-19 11:05:26+00:00): Du er velkommen til at navngive vejene. Kommunens plan: https://vis.dataforsyningen.dk/navngivneveje/471c5f30-ec2f-4f98-8622-d4de4d283031?format=json
literan (2025-07-28 17:05:26+00:00): permit означает что доступно всем, нужно лишь получить формальный пропуск (но дают всем). Мне точно можно туда заехать?
leobass (2025-07-28 17:18:11+00:00): тогда private поставить?
literan (2025-07-28 18:52:14+00:00): да, motor_vehicle=private
NeisBot (2025-07-27 17:36:31+00:00): Hi A-JJ, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Added paths and tracks, including grass surfaces and grade 3 tracktype, and adjusted highway classifications for some ways."

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment #NoComment #AIgenerated
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-07-28 12:30:21+00:00): Are these tag documented somewhere? I chose the incorrect one because I didn't find any info about htis case of multiple city name for a street name or address. These are postal city names that must be used alongside the street name for sending post there, but the official city name is Montréal since 2001 fusions.
mueschel (2025-07-28 12:55:28+00:00): Hi,
the "old_addr:*" tags are documented
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:old_addr:housenumber

The ones with a ":postal" suffix are not. If the addr:city:postal is required for sending post, they should be tagged on address nodes, not on the streets.

The proper tag for this should be discussed, involving the people working with addresses, e.g. from Nominatim.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-07-28 13:49:02+00:00): https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/special-cases-of-distinct-civil-and-postal-addresses-city-names/133288
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-07-31 13:01:52+00:00): seems that contact:city would be better suited for this. I will update them (WIP)
user_5359 (2025-07-29 11:53:39+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/13029684244. What is the mean of the tag x-dld-kind = new ?
dmfr (2025-07-29 12:06:54+00:00): Obviously a mistake, thanks for bringing that to my attention! Fixed it.
dadavid (2025-09-01 13:02:47+00:00): Hi, ich glaube, hier [1] ist bzgl der Verbindungen der ways auch etwas schief gelaufen :) am Besten einfach mal die ganzen OSMI issues durchsehen [2]

Viele Grüße

David


[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13029800937 

[2] https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/hdyc-osmi-issues?uid=23034327
fmc_7 (2025-09-24 12:36:57+00:00): Danke.
Hab's behoben [1]

LG
Sebá
Tom van Dijk (2025-08-06 19:16:20+00:00): This changeset spans a big part of sweden. Next time it's advisable to split such a change up into each neighborhood/city/county to ensure that reviewing goes smoothly
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169572172
Ankpudding (2025-08-07 12:42:04+00:00): Ok, thanks, I'll keep that in mind next time!
Clown Pennywise (2025-07-27 20:08:26+00:00): Credo che la colonnina sia più a sud-est, di fronte alla caserma dei carabinieri, o mi sbaglio?
Fradeve11 (2025-07-29 16:49:04+00:00): hai ragione!
adesso correggo
grazie!
Clown Pennywise (2025-07-29 16:54:40+00:00): grande Fradeve11! Tanto di cappello per l'enorme lavoro che hai fatto su Terlizzi!
M!dgard (2025-07-27 17:51:04+00:00): Also https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4878759
jeslop (2025-07-30 08:46:49+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169708289
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-07-30 06:55:42+00:00): BTW, ideally this edit would have source=survey that would make clear that info from here trumps less up to date sources

"Post-mapping party fixes" kind of implies it, but is easier to miss
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-07-30 06:56:16+00:00): (related to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1036769593/history )
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-07-30 06:56:35+00:00): or maybe it should be 
source=survey + Esri World Imagery
?
NLBRT (2025-07-30 07:59:10+00:00): I guess the latter works best. Eitherway, I'm noting this for future changesets.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-07-30 08:05:18+00:00): thanks!

I suspect that they never looked at way history, but a bit confused tagging here makes harder to clearly blame them for not doing so
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-07-30 08:06:38+00:00): BTW, given that https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169664972 never stated sources either it would be fine to just revert it 

at least in my opinion
jeslop (2025-07-30 08:46:50+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169708289
mga_geo (2025-08-26 14:31:52+00:00): Bonjour Adrien,
Avec un peu de retard je découvre tes modifications.
Cela a cassé la continuité du trajet des bus.
Connais-tu l'actuel trajet ?
Marc
PanierAvide (2025-08-26 14:35:56+00:00): Bonjour Marc, pourtant j'ai passé des heures à remettre les relations en place... C'était un sacré bazar, j'ai dû louper des trucs, désolé pour ça. Je ne connais pas les trajets actuels des bus, et je ne passe pas de manière régulière sur cette route.
jeslop (2025-07-30 08:47:54+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169708334
dvdhoven (2025-07-28 05:16:29+00:00): Voetgangers mogen gewoon van verplichte fietspaden gebruik maken. Dan doen ze overal in het land.
Als dit fietspad verboden is voor voetgangers, hoe komen voetgangers dan nog aan de overkant? Dat wordt een reuze omweg.
Ook loopt er een wandelroute over dit pad.
Ik heb foot=no verwijderd

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
SpinOff (2025-10-11 17:49:58+00:00): Jakie jest źródło nazw "Krzemienie Karmelowe" i "Kartofel"?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-23 06:03:22+00:00): reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410  and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036  remain not answered

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173656566
jeslop (2025-07-30 08:48:13+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169708345
jeslop (2025-07-30 08:49:10+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169708376
jeslop (2025-07-30 09:01:15+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169708875
archie (2025-07-27 18:34:25+00:00): Helt makalöst! Gud vad bra! Stort tack!!!
Fizzie-DWG (2025-07-28 07:42:59+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18489
DD1GJ (2025-07-28 05:02:20+00:00): Hallo, durch das Löschen des Pfades über die Wiese beim Hitsche Maar ist nun eine Lücke in der Relation Maare-Pfad. Wurde da die Wegführung geändert? Verläuft die Wanderroute an dieser Stelle nun über dieses Wegstück https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/38362172  ?

PS: Anderungssatzkommentare wären sehr hilfreich
MaciekMma (2025-07-27 19:31:51+00:00): Hej, jezeli uzyjesz warstwy z LIDAR (po polskiemu nazywaja to chyba "cieniowanie") to zobaczysz slad wydeptanych sciezek lesnych, ktorych ze zdjec lotniczych nie widac. To jest znakomite uzupelnienie do sladu GPS, ktory jest dosyc niedokladny w lesie. Powodzenia
ENIGMAT (2025-07-27 20:18:42+00:00): Cześć. Z LIDARu korzystam częściej niż z ortofoto a tam gdzie nie widać na żadnym zobrazowaniu, to nogi albo motor i gpx ;). Dzięki, pozdrawiam.
MaciekMma (2025-07-28 06:19:00+00:00): solidna firma
yrtimiD (2025-07-31 09:53:27+00:00): hi, looks like you accidentally dragged node of the way and now way is broken: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/297686797#map=16/31.29050/34.24738

I'd suggest carefully reviewing changes before saving them. Please fix, or if you need help with fixing - please leave a note, I'll be happy to help.
KieranW25 (2025-07-31 15:33:59+00:00): Hi yrtimiD, thank you for flagging. I don't believe I did so, but apologies if I did. Shall correct now anyway. Perfect example of why I always tick the yes to checking anyways.
urk (2026-04-13 13:42:00+00:00): Wo hast du hier (way 51728527) ein Zeichen für bicycle=no gesehen? Es macht wahrscheinlich kein Spaß dortlanf zu fahren aber verboten scheint es mir nicht zu sein.
DD1GJ (2025-07-28 06:37:30+00:00): Wieso access=no bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1417910378 ? Dieses Wegstück ist Bestandteil von zwei Wanderrouten.
CAM-Gerlach (2026-05-27 22:41:38+00:00): Thanks! I in changeset 183278028 removed the SEO spam description=* that was evidently accidentally left after this cleanup.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183278028
Leo Slager (2025-07-28 10:45:34+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Taya_S (2025-07-27 19:25:41+00:00): Reverted vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169576618
Taya_S (2025-07-27 19:25:29+00:00): Reverted vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169576611
NeisBot (2025-07-27 19:26:30+00:00): Hi Flou-m, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Added contact and address details to an events venue, and updated building tags."

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment #NoComment #AIgenerated
Halfix (2025-07-28 06:47:44+00:00): Ich war schon mehrfach an dieser Stelle und da ist natürlich kein klassischer Aussichtspunkt. Ich vermute, dass jemand in Ermangelung einer besseren Option den Node-Typ Aussichtspunkt kreativ genutzt hat, um die Position des "Francke-Kamin" sichtbar zu machen. Der Name hängt zwar auch an dem via_ferrata Abschnitt, aber via_ferrata wir von Carto nicht gerendert, so dass der Name und die Position des "Francke-Kamin" jetzt auf der Standardkarte verschwunden ist. Das ist der Grund warum ich den Node in einer Güterabwägung seinerzeit nicht kassiert habe, obwohl er sachlich natürlich fraglich ist.
Andreas Binder (2025-07-28 17:27:09+00:00): Danke fürs Feedback. Hab den "Francke-Kamin" nun als place=locality wieder eingetragen. Wäre für mich akzeptabler als ein Aussichtspunkt. Was meinst Du?
Andreas Binder (2025-07-28 17:46:28+00:00): Update: Habe einen guidepost draus gemacht https://up.picr.de/49883690vz.jpg
Halfix (2025-07-29 06:43:02+00:00): Gute Lösung. Es deutet auch indirekt an, dass da eine Wegbesonderheit ist, denn es ist ja auf der Standardkarte nicht klar, warum der Pfad dort eine Unterbrechung zeigt.
Leo Slager (2025-07-28 10:42:28+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
itineris (2025-09-15 07:27:17+00:00): Szia!

Ez a révfülöpi Garden Club pontosan micsoda? Valószínűleg nem természetes barlang - ilyen névvel.

Üdv:
Ákos
utvonalfelmeresek (2025-09-15 20:16:36+00:00): Egy földbe vájt pincehelyiség, amiben lehet hűsölni és vannak benne asztalok:
https://panoramax.openstreetmap.fr/?s=fp;s2;pca47f302-0f03-4e24-91c6-e96052195636;c95.00/0.00/30;m17.06/46.828863/17.643178;bs
itineris (2025-09-15 20:34:55+00:00): Köszönöm.
Akkor nem natural=cave_entrance, hanem man_made=cellar_entrance.
Javítottam.
rempshaener (2026-01-23 18:45:28+00:00): Hallo,

mit Hinweis auf https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177607672
Könntest du den Namen bitte löschen? Sinnvoll wäre auch noch die Erweiterung von fire_hydrant, ich vermute mal um fire_hydrant:type=pipe.

Vielen Dank und Gruß