piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
gscholz (2024-01-08 08:11:38+00:00): Can you please contribute to the communication here?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145905721

Kind regards
Guido
phoenixsaigon1698 (2024-01-12 06:45:17+00:00): Hi GrabVN_QThoai,

Please help me check these error:
1. relation with multiple restriction values
2. member 1197899252 without role

Thank you.
3. member 1208244686 without role
4. "via" member is missing
5. "to" member is missing
phoenixsaigon1698 (2024-01-12 06:58:31+00:00): I fixed the errors. Please note for the next time. Thank you for your contribution.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-01-12 10:47:51+00:00): These roads are already mapped
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146014500
ljb_nj (2024-01-11 22:34:03+00:00): There is no such thing as a 'firebreak trench'. A actual firebreak in the Pinelands is more like 50ft wide. What you are mapping here are probably plow lines, narrow cuts through the woods created by the Forest Fire Service for their exclusive use, usually one time, to access a wildfire or prescribed burn area. They are supposed to revert to nature and disappear over time afterwards. Which they will NOT do if people map them, walk them, and ride bikes on them.

It would really be better if you only mapped paths based on aerial imagery (NOT elevation changes), or on-site surveys with GPS.
BPTT (2024-01-12 04:08:58+00:00): If this is the case, I'm sorry; I was misled. But I was specifically told by a trusted source that they were trenches dug for fires, and the OSM feature type "trench" with barrier=ditch seemed like a not-incorrect, low-impact choice since they barely render in any webmaps, including OSM. Trenches/ditches most accurately describe what I've seen with my eyes, and until OSM has plow lines as features, I'd argue trenches are the safest choice to prevent wandering feet and bicycles. I was mapping with no ill intent. In fact, the reason I have mapped so many of these features as trenches throughout Wharton SF is because they WERE mapped as paths for several years, and Strava and RidewithGPS activity heatmaps will back this up all throughout the Pines. I really don't appreciate the aggressive tone of some of your comments on my changesets or how territorial you seem to be over this area in particular. The Pines are a very important place to me too and there are particular places that are special to me. In and out of the Pines, I map based on my personal memories, GPX files, aerial imagery from as many sources as I can find, and LIDAR layers to boot. I use all available resources. Please don't assume the worst from other people who want the best for a common interest.
augil (2024-01-13 11:00:37+00:00): alan içerisindeki diğer alanlar, ilerde kolaylıkla üzerine eklenebilir. detaylı bir şekilde yapmak her zaman daha doğrusudur ama silmeyi gerektirecek bir neden değil. silinen alanın çoğunu mera, otluk alan ve planlanmış yol şeritleri oluşturuyor. içindeki yerleşim bölgeleri meranın bir parçası olmadığını anlamak için ayrıştırmaya gerek yok. farklı renkte olmaları yardımcı oluyor zaten.
MxxCon (2024-01-16 01:15:09+00:00): Since in US there’s no official regulatory body managing hotel star ratings and each hotel can rate themselves however many stars they want, it serves no purpose other than promotional/advertisement for the hotels.
As such, this tag is going to be removed.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146015308
Xvtn (2024-01-08 22:59:18+00:00): Good catch!
Frans S (2024-01-08 14:21:35+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
A few remarks.
Minor Highways in rural areas are to be tagged as highway=unclassified. (residential is used in urban areas, big village/towns.)
Default tagging of buildings on HOTOSM projects is building=yes.
And  square each rectangular building with the Q key.
Best regards
Yunan973 (2024-07-06 20:57:45+00:00): Bonjour,

je constate qu'il t"arrive d'inverser SIRET et SIREN : le 1er est sur 14 chiffres, le second sur 9 chiffres et non l'inverse.

Cordialement
LudovicG (2024-07-08 09:26:19+00:00): Bonjour,

Oui merci je connais les longueurs des deux :D

Sûrement un loupé au clavier (quand iD propose des tags une fois `ref:FR:` saisi, je dois me louper au moment de la sélection) et un manque de relecture !

Quand tu dis "il t'arrive", j'ai eu beaucoup de loupés ? :D (tout est déjà corrigé ?)

Cordialement
Yunan973 (2024-07-13 14:16:47+00:00): Non, pas beaucoup, 2 ou 3.
Tu n'es pas le seul alors quand je les corrigeais, je gardais un lien sur les auteurs pour voir si c'était récurrent ou passager. Il y en a un autre qui a fait plusieurs fois des erreurs de ce type mais cela remontait à 5 ans donc je n'ai pas réagi. Toi c'était plus récent alors je me suis permis cette alerte toute amicale.

Sinon oui, tout est corrigé (enfin il y a d'autres erreurs mais les inversions siret/siren sont toutes corrigées).

Bonne continuation.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-01-12 10:36:07+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Piste_Maps
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146016998
VLD278 (2024-01-25 21:29:04+00:00): Hello,
I am reaching out in regards to w1237982820. I was just wondering if "Isaacs residence" was the formal name of the NGO at this location? Thank you for your time. 
VLD278
matthewsheffield (2024-01-28 20:05:57+00:00): It seems highly unlikely but as I was remote mapping I followed convention and left previous data intact. There may be local use to this which I'm unaware of though. Feel free to contact the user who entered this initially.
VLD278 (2024-02-02 16:23:40+00:00): Thank you for the clarification, have a good day!
Hans Thompson (2024-01-08 17:54:53+00:00): where are these trail names coming from?
b-holdet (2024-01-08 07:37:30+00:00): 👍😉
gscholz (2024-01-14 08:55:34+00:00): Hi Barbara Ogori,
this changeset has created several errors regarding self intersecting lines and displaced ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=35.59999&lat=-0.75508&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=146017700

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
VA00 (2024-02-27 15:58:49+00:00): Nie wiem co to za edycja, ale została po niej pusta linia https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/339168014
Pooh01 (2024-02-28 13:28:20+00:00): Wychodzi na to, że to jakaś pozostałość po wcześniejszych granicach - znajduje się wewnątrz granic parafii (relacja 4730397). Usuwam.
silversurfer83 (2024-01-08 14:44:08+00:00): Hallo :)

sicher, dass der Parkplatz dort ist? Die Fläche ein paar Meter weiter nördlich sieht eher nach Wanderparkplatz aus, oder?

Gruß aus Korbach
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146018107
Naturpark Kellerwald-Edersee (2024-01-09 07:25:35+00:00): Hallo silversurfer83,

da hast du absolut recht. Der Wanderparkplatz ist den Weg hoch auf der rechten Seite. Danke für deinen Kommentar. 

LG 
NPKE
SomeoneElse (2024-01-13 11:25:42+00:00): Hello,
In this changeset you deleted the buoy at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3815077900/history .  I've undeleted it.
Also, please do try and use better changeset comments than just "another correction".  It helps other mappers to understand what you're doing.
Best Regards,
Andy (from OSM's Data Working Group).
Jenda (2025-04-05 17:19:00+00:00): Hi, are you sure this is a highway? The highway ends in Jíloviště; the road from Jíloviště to Baně is a normal class-1 road. (at least 2016-2024, I have not been there since September 2024)
Eino81 (2025-04-05 18:17:04+00:00): Hi, sincne then I realized, it was a mistake. You can update that from Jiloviste.
arctic-rocinante (2024-06-01 09:35:44+00:00): Hi there! I’ve noticed that some of the “highway=ford” nodes in this changeset are actually bridges in reality.

I’ve corrected a few of them, but some of the remaining ones may still be wrong (I wasn’t able to survey all of them).
SwedenMapEditor (2024-01-08 19:33:11+00:00): Jag menade Fisketjärn.
ablevi202 (2024-01-08 09:13:07+00:00): welch and leon township were given wrong wikidata tags, i have since fixed it.
Dodko (2024-01-08 20:33:15+00:00): Pre reštauráciu je dobré doplniť otvárací čas, web, telefón, mail.

Na vytvorenie kódu pre otvárací čas je pomôcka https://projets.pavie.info/yohours/
silversurfer83 (2024-01-08 14:30:36+00:00): Gude :)

kleiner Hinweis: Diese Flächen wie hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1237997427 sind in aller Regel keine Wiesen im landwirtschaftlichen Sinne. Da ist landuse=grass angemessener. Und wenn es mit Blumen bepflanzt ist, könnte es auch landuse=flowerbed sein. Im Zweifel hilft das Wiki weiter (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Land_use)
Oder bei Fragen, einfach fragen :)

cheers
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146020420
bxl-forever (2024-01-08 23:50:23+00:00): Hello,

Are you sure about the lane count for this part?  Last week I updated it because there is only one lane left since the works began, and the construction project aims at a permanent situation with fewer lanes than before; I don’t see why it should be set as lanes=3 and how this is a  "fix".
What do you think?
mux4 (2024-01-09 09:15:06+00:00): Oh, sorry, my mistake. You can revert the changes.
olo81 (2024-01-08 23:34:12+00:00): do poprawy, błędne tagowanie
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:substation?uselang=pl
maraf24 (2024-01-14 19:43:11+00:00): Gdzie tu jest błąd?
olo81 (2024-01-14 21:31:03+00:00): substation=yes
maraf24 (2024-01-14 22:41:57+00:00): To edytor iD automatycznie dodaje ten podtag. Nie wiem w jakim celu.
м1т (2024-01-08 12:14:26+00:00): Маршруты через плотину едут по изменённому маршруту исходя из схем на портале.
https://portal.gpt.adc.spb.ru/Portal/transport/route/1731
https://vk.com/kolpino?w=wall-24565084_1156601
Kecsege (2024-02-26 22:02:57+00:00): Szia!

A torvaji temetőn szerintem jó az amenity, nem kell a buildingnál is megismételni, hogy mortuary. Simán elég a yes, vagy ha tudsz valami jobba leírót azt helyette ráteheted.
Gaurdein (2024-02-26 22:15:51+00:00): Szia, azért tageltem így mert a building=yes az átalános és az építés idején megjelölt célt jelölni, az amenity pedig a jelenlegi használatát, ahogy a wiki (angol) írja: building=hospital és amenity=marketplace egy eredetileg kórháznak szánt épület de jelenleg piacként üzemel. Pontosan én se tudom, hogy minek épült és hogy minek van használva, csak hallásból tudom, kinézetre pedig inkább halottasház mint bármi más.
Kecsege (2024-02-26 22:24:45+00:00): Igen, de a hospital egy létező building típus is. Ezt a halottasházat úgy találtam, hogy Magyarországon csak itt volt building mortuary-nak jelölve. A taginfo szerint a világon is kb csak a németek használják így.

De nem akkora probléma ha így marad gondolom, szóval ha úgy érzed maradhat így.
Gaurdein (2024-02-27 10:48:09+00:00): Gondolom (de csak szerintem) sok tag hiányos, mert mindenki csakis a dokumentáció szerint térképezik, így ha valamire lenne esetleg jobb tagelés, akkor se használják, lásd Buildings oldal a wiki-n, CTRL+F mortuary és 0 találat, ezért marad a B terv, azaz building=yes. Sok tag nem is hivatalos csak annyian használják, hogy de facto lesz: hivatalosan akármilyen címke=érték kombináció engedélyezett, ámbár mindenkinek érdemes tartania a jól beválthoz, hisz azt az adatfelhasználók is ismerik, ha a világon csak 30 building=mortuary van, akkor senki nem fogja ezt megfelelően feldolgozni, ellenben az amenity=mortuary ami dokumentált és gyakran használt; szóval ebben teljesen igazad van. Részemről: remélem többen elkezdik majd használni, ezt a döntést is inkább csak az OCD-m és kis részben az egóm védi :)
woodpeck_repair (2024-02-27 21:52:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 147991516 where the changeset comment is: revert unsourced name changes by Avni Miftari
eggie (2024-01-08 11:43:08+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Lijkt mij oke voor nu  Wellicht heb je hier nog iets aan https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal_talk:Kiss_and_ride

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
TheConductor (2024-01-08 17:41:57+00:00): Thanks for adding exit numbers! I was just wondering where you found those? I was going to drive  the corridor to get them but haven't had the chance yet.
OrdinaryScarlett (2024-01-08 21:16:23+00:00): I sourced them from this video here:

https://youtu.be/hA54-B8uiUE?si=Ts9wFt-PQGxckH1H
rickmastfan67 (2024-01-15 06:29:10+00:00): Word of advice then, make sure you either right away add your source as a comment after submitting the changeset, or put it in the changeset description.

This allows the other mappers to know where you got them from. ;)
Hb- (2026-04-03 14:56:05+00:00): Bei node/11499726078 war fixme=wert_unbekannt gesetzt. Welcher Wert muss hier nachgetragen werden?
Trockennasenaffe (2026-04-04 04:45:53+00:00): Das ist ein Geschwindigkeits-Ankündigungssignal. Leider konnte ich nicht erkennen, welche Geschwindigkeit angekündigt wird, da ich es nur von hinten gesehen habe. Da steht eine Ziffer drauf.
Hb- (2026-04-04 08:09:02+00:00): Im Oktober 2022 war wohl 20 km/h talwärts ausgezeichnet, siehe https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=169724212384818&focus=photo
mark2525 (2024-02-06 19:36:43+00:00): Mateusz Konieczny ten potok nazywa się Sowlinka, nawet w Wikipedii jest to napisane! Potok Starowiejski jak sama nazwa wskazuje znajduje się na terenie Starej Wsi i jest w zasadzie dopływem (dopływami) Sowlinki płynącym ze zbocza Cichonia. Ponieważ w Starej Wsi na zboczach Cichonia i Jeżowej Wody jest bardzo duża ilość takich drobnych cieków wodnych które łączą się w całość to mogą się zdarzyć różnice w nazewnictwie na różnych mapach. Jednak Hydroportal jednoznacznie pokazuje, że Sowlinka wypływa spod Jeżowej Góry i jest dopływem Łososiny. Proszę poprawić tą nazwę.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-07 07:10:51+00:00): > Mateusz Konieczny ten potok nazywa się Sowlinka, nawet w Wikipedii jest to napisane!

Zauważ że nazwa https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/352044958 została zmieniona w innej edycji, patrz na https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/352044958/history

ta edycja, zgodnie z jej opisaem, dodała tag wikipedia
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-07 07:12:54+00:00): Zapytałem się w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145446576

Jak wiesz która nazwa jest poprawna to ją możesz zmienić.

Być może warto zobaczyć na inne edycje wykonane prez tamte konto
SpinOff (2024-01-10 00:01:08+00:00): Hej. Do schodów możesz jeszcze dorzucić tag incline. Zazwyczaj wystarczy wartość  incline=up lub incline=down.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:incline
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-08 10:50:24+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4448148030
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1205425508

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
habi (2024-01-09 10:41:20+00:00): Ciao Rüedu

Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap!
Schön machst du hier mit und hilfst, die Karte und die Kartendaten zu pflegen.

Du hast hier das Gebäude https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/204642226/ an die swisstopo Lufbilder angepasst.
Im Kanton Bern haben wir Zugriff auf die offiziellen Gebäude-Umrisse und den Katasterplan, um Gebäude in OpenStreetMap zu pflegen.
Ich habe deine Anpassung in https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=146061319 weiter verbessert und den Haus-Umriss an den Katasterplan angepasst, wie es auch auch alle anderen Geböude hier in der Gegend (und fast im gesamten Kanton Bern) sind.
E Gruess usem Liebifäud,
habi
woodpeck (2024-01-08 11:04:00+00:00): Hello and welcome Darya Khan! Please don't put things like "d10" in the "name" field. If the house has the number 10, then there's an extra "house number" field for that. The "name" field is usually left empty for residential properties.

Also, you don't have to press "save" for every single house; you can draw a handful of houses and then save all at once.
habi (2024-01-08 11:18:25+00:00): Also eigentlich die Details des Defi im Bremgartenwald in Bern mit den Details des Defi in St. Gallen zusammengeführt, so dass es aus meiner Sicht am meisten Sinn macht.
chnuessli (2024-01-08 12:54:13+00:00): Danke habi für die Anpassung. GIng wohl beim QA Prozess noch unter. Node ist aber vor den Changes in der App bei der das nicht mehr passieren sollte.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-11 20:33:17+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1039593544/history has shop = Fruits that was added in this edit
shop=Fruits ? Maybe shop=greengrocer was intended? If they truly sell solely only fruit then maybe extra tag like greengrocer=fruit would be better? If they sell also vegetables then https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=greengrocer is definitely better.

shop=greengrocer is far more widely used and supported and does fit even if only variety of fruits is sold.

But maybe another shop tag would fit better? Maybe shop=farm? ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=farm )
Filip009 (2024-01-09 13:02:15+00:00): I think nowadays, when this volcano is not active it is better to tag it as a peak. Tell me why we should tag it as volcano.
aceman444 (2025-04-19 16:43:51+00:00): Je to pozostatok vulkanu a ma predsa nastaveny stav volcano:status=extinct , tak to kludne moze byt natural=volcano. Aj ked v tom pripade by mozno ten bod mal byt v strede krateru (okraje krateru sa este oznacia samostatne). Tym by sa aj oddelil byvaly vulkan od sucasneho vrchu Polana, ktory netvori cely krater a je len jednym z vrcholov v kratere. To by podla Vas davalo vacsi zmysel?
Filip009 (2025-04-19 18:05:02+00:00): Keďže je neaktívny, je podľa mňa postačujúce volcano:status=extinct.
aceman444 (2025-04-19 21:03:23+00:00): Ja zas myslim, ze volcano:status bez natural=volcano nema melmi zmysel. A kedze to stale vyzera ako sopka, a OSM ma na tieto vyhasnute vulkany volcano:status=extinct tak asi sa znacia aj inde po svete a nie je to dovod, ze ked je vyhasnuty tak sa nemusi znacit. No ukazem coskoro moj navrh.
aceman444 (2025-04-20 11:05:14+00:00): Napriklad takto:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=165179018
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-08 11:20:21+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11499818539

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eserte (2024-10-12 09:05:42+00:00): Hi!

Du hast mit diesem Changeset beim Eisenhammerweg die Surface von Kopfsteinpflaster auf Asphalt geändert. Laut https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4385376 stimmt das aber nicht. Falls das tatsächlich der Fall ist (ich war hier lange nicht vor Ort): kann das wieder auf den ursprünglichen Zustand geändert werden?
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-08 11:30:20+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11499818539

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eggie (2024-01-08 11:48:44+00:00): De parkeerplaats zelf kun je op een vlak zetten met amenity=parking
name=???   meestal heeft het geen naam.. wel 
operator=Monkey Town Arnhem
access=?  customers? 



De straatnaam hoort niet op de toegangsweg. Geen officiële straatnaam.
Die kun je er beter afhalen. 

MVG
eggie
torger (2024-01-08 21:35:37+00:00): Det verkar som justeringen gjorts efter ojusterad Bing (Bing ligger ofta 10 - 40 meter fel) så det har blivit mer fel snarare än mindre. Trafikverket Road Network är en bra referens på de flesta ställen så flyttar man så vägarna hamnar bredvid det då gör man antagligen fel.

Det finns två sätt att göra, antingen gör man revert på hela changesetet (jag kan göra det åt dig om du vill), eller så justerar man tillbaka det som blivit fel. Hur vill du göra?
torger (2024-01-09 19:40:57+00:00): Jag har nu gjort revert på det som var fel-justerat men behöll delarna som var ok, se
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146078093
torger (2024-01-08 21:38:01+00:00): Även detta changeset verkar tillföra fler fel än det löser, troligen för att man ritat efter Bing som ligger fel och är lite gamla. Jag kan göra revert på det, eller så får man justera tillbaka det som blivit fel. Hur vill du att jag gör?
torger (2024-01-09 19:42:17+00:00): Jag har nu gjort revert på det som var fel-justerat men behöll delarna som var ok, se
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146078475
м1т (2024-01-08 11:52:47+00:00): Полное название остановок взято из проекта реестра (запись от 26.12.2023, О внесении изменения в распоряжение Комитета по транспорту от 14.07.2022 № 282-р) 
https://www.gov.spb.ru/gov/otrasl/c_transport/documents/antikorrupcionnaya-ekspertiza-proektov-normativnyh-pravovyh-aktov/
м1т (2024-01-08 11:57:33+00:00): ссылка
https://view.officeapps.live.com/op/view.aspx?src=https%3A%2F%2Fwikiroutes.info%2Fattachments%2F210ad7e7bc49aa68389d4e8c9e9%2FReestr0smezhnih9__210ad7e7bc49aa68389d4e8c9e9.xlsx&wdOrigin=BROWSELINK
nona mostafa (2024-01-11 12:21:20+00:00): Hello Soulive ;
I see you modified the ref tag on some streets
 Example
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/152039436
Could you please provide us with the source you used to modify the ref tag to these streets?
Regards
 nona mostafa
Souleiman Asff (2024-01-11 15:46:40+00:00): https://acrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:sc:eu:7d8749a9-2dcd-496a-885c-53b59d18083f

According to the official bulletin of the Moroccan Ministry of Equipment and Water dated 6 November 2023, the route of the RR601 links Talsint to Boudnib, connecting to the RN17. The name RN4 is incorrect; it links Missour to the RN17 north of Bouarfa, passing through Talsint. There has recently been a renumbering of regional and provincial roads in Morocco, which completes the renumbering of national roads in 2018.
nona mostafa (2024-01-14 07:14:23+00:00): Thank you for providing this useful resource.
eggie (2024-01-08 12:31:26+00:00): De toegangsweg heb ik even losgemaakt van de amenity=parking..
MVG
eggie
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-05 02:57:53+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11499981473/history has shop = bazar_chino that was added in this edit
shop=bazar_chino ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop or https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Tag_descriptions_for_key_%22shop%22 fitting? Maybe new value needs to be invented? Maybe this data is wrong and there is no shop here? Maybe it is not a shop but something else?
OSM-Mojacar (2026-02-05 20:51:53+00:00): It's a popular shop type in Spain run by chinese people, they all sell the same type of cheap products and brands imported from china for home, garden, cheap plastic toys, a few cheap clothes, etc. I didn't find any matching shop type but don't know how to create one
MarinoBM (2026-02-06 10:44:27+00:00): La etiqueta más adecuada es shop=variety_store 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:shop=variety%20store?uselang=es
OSM-Mojacar (2026-02-07 00:12:46+00:00): No estoy seguro, ni es una cadena low cost tipo Flying Tiger ni es un "todo a 100" con precios fijos. Al contrario, los bazares chinos son conocidos por tener precios inflados y calidades inferiores comparados con la tiendas normales, justo lo contrario que las "variety stores"