piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:27:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:52:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:25:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:37:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:43:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
A67-A67 (2023-03-09 16:16:38+00:00): Ik heb de naam hersteld. Rijkswaterstaat noemt het wel degelijk  "Knooppunt De Hoek". Op de bewegwijzering staat ook de volledige naam, maar met knooppunt afgekort tot een symbool. Op oudere borden stond het woord uitgeschreven.

Alle andere knooppunten in Nederland zijn getagd met een naam die begint met "Knooppunt". Er is geen reden om van knooppunten in deze omgeving een uitzondering te maken.
Herrieman (2023-03-09 17:22:50+00:00): Ha A67-A67, ik ben het niet helemaal met je eens. Maar wel dat het goed is om consistent te zijn door Nederland. Daarom even een topic geopend op het forum: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/is-knooppunt-onderdeel-van-de-naam-van-snelwegknooppunten/96673
BCNorwich (2023-01-05 16:23:16+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Your addition placed the business as for the whole building which I don't think is correct. It also dragged the building outline out of shape.

I've reinstated the building shape and made a POI of the business. Please check that the POI is correctly positioned in the building.

Hope this is OK, Regards Bernard.
Ziggy Sobotka (2023-01-07 16:25:11+00:00): Hi LDG72IFURT,

Nice to see you having started to map on OSM! Welcome to the community!

This edit seems a bit random. There are loads of roads in the area which haven't been mapped, but you chose to add this little access road. Nothing wrong with that per se, in case this is a legitimate and important feature. Do you know this place? Why have you chosen to add this one, and not the other roads in the area?

All the best,
Ziggy
mweper (2023-01-05 15:03:52+00:00): Hola. Con respecto al nodo https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10308714311 ¿Que es lo que se quiere mapear? ya que no puedo deducirlo por etiquetado. ¿Tienes más datos al respecto?
Warin61 (2023-01-05 21:48:39+00:00): Why do you have 3 things all saying 'Clayton North'??? 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1127497931

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1127497929

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15088571

????
Diacritic (2023-01-06 02:29:26+00:00): This user has tried several times to add "Clayton North" as a suburb to the map.

The node has now been added for the neighbourhood, but it appears this Derrick is trying to get boundaries to render for the neighbourhood.

Derrick, thank you for adjusting your edits in light of my previous comments about adding a suburb. Unfortunately, the boundaries of Clayton North are not well defined, and don't count as "administrative" boundaries. Administrative boundaries are dictated by the authorities (in this case, the State Government).

I'll tidy up your edits again so that there aren't the duplicates that were there previously. You will see Clayton North rendered (once the tiles update, which can take a couple of days) where the node is, but it will look different to the suburbs nearby.

You can reply to these comments by clicking the link in the notification email, then scrolling in the left hand pane to the "Discussion" section.

Dian.
Derrick_86 (2023-01-06 03:45:52+00:00): @diacritic 
sorry for the few errors i have done because i am new to this site. I was just wondering what changes you made because when i search Clayton North up on the maps it doesnt show anything about it not even neighbourhood. Just curious as to why this has happened. 

Derrick
Diacritic (2023-01-06 05:29:58+00:00): Hi Derrick,

No problem at all. Thanks for getting in touch.

The search bar on the OSM website uses a tool called Nominatim. https://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/ui/search.html

Nominatim doesn't update every day, but once it has updated the neighbourhood node we've created should show in the search results.

Try searching for Clayton North in a couple of days and you should see the edit cascade through. :)

Dian
Warin61 (2023-01-06 07:48:15+00:00): @ Derrick_86  No need to be 'sorry' about it. We all do things when starting out - part of learning is making errors. But you must be aware that they are errors to learn from them. 
OSM is vast - there is a lot to learn, just learn the bits you are interested in and leave the other bits for others :) 
Any problems .. ask. May be a bit terse .. I'm off to make dinner.. bye.
Warin61 (2023-01-06 07:52:31+00:00): Oh.. you can look up peoples change sets ..click on their 'name' and you get 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Diacritic
then look at the edits
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Diacritic/history
and then you can look for the particular changeset your interested in
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/130930113
and then click on the feature 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10303591907

My stomach is grumbling...
stick2 (2023-01-05 17:45:13+00:00): If there's an actual obstruction, it would be better to map that rather than use turn-restrictions
nicksprink (2023-01-05 20:59:11+00:00): Hi, I'm new to this.  You can't exit this road on to Ascot Road, but can enter from Ascot Road.  However road is two way, not a one way street.
BCNorwich (2023-01-06 07:34:14+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap, a live worldwide database from which many maps are compiled.

I've reverted this changeset because it contains obvious fiction. Please only upload genuine verifiable features to OSM. You can keep your study project offline without corrupting OSM.

Regards Bernard.
Loeffle (2023-01-05 13:38:35+00:00): Hallo Pyram,
ich benutze die App "Street Complete" und da waren die Fragen halt auf Englisch ;)
wenn ich bei etwas die Zuordnung nicht weiß, mache ich Fotos. 
Der Klosterhof ist schon so eine Art Fußgängerzone, oder halt einfach der Vorplatz vom ehem. Kloster...
pyram (2023-01-05 16:55:14+00:00): Alles klar.
Und hier noch mehr zum Lernen ;-)
Um sich mit einem Kollegen auszutauschen nutzt man üblicherweise nicht die Kommentarfunktion eines "changesetzs" (wie hier), sondern kann eine "persönliche" Nachricht über den Benutzeraccount schicken: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/pyram => Nachricht senden
Ersteres dient dem direkten Kommentieren oder Rückfragen zu einem ganz bestimmten Änderungssatz.
Ansonsten kann man auch die Notiz ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2824489 ) wieder öffnen und dort Antworten).
Wenn irgendeine Hilfe benötigt wird: Hier beißt (fast) niemand.
Frans S (2023-02-02 16:03:23+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
A remark about what to map/tag. You mapped 2 ponds and tagged them as residential area. Not correct.  The tag should be  Natural=water.
Best regards and keep mapping
baprischka (2023-04-12 19:43:04+00:00): Questo stop esiste ancora o si può togliere? Non mi sembra normale
https://maproulette.org/challenge/38577/task/156880731
Andrea Musuruane (2023-04-13 08:23:44+00:00): Non esiste e non credo sia mai esistito. L'ho rimosso. Grazie per la segnalazione.
ivanbranco (2023-01-06 22:28:31+00:00): Ciao Davide, benvenuto su OSM!

Se è un edificio di nuova costruzione probabilmente avrà gli angoli retti. La prossima volta puoi cliccare sull'edificio e premere Q sulla tastiera per renderlo squadrato.

Altri appunti: per convenzioni in Italia inseriamo gli indirizzi come nodi in corrispondenza dell'ingresso o della targhetta col numero e scriviamo l'esponente in minuscolo (quindi 1b invece di 1B). Sempre per convenzione scriviamo i numeri romani in lettere, quindi la via dovrebbe chiamarsi come la via principale.

Buon mapping!
Frans S (2023-02-01 17:30:47+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
A remark about how to map a building.
Each building need to be mapped as a single building. Don't collect a row and map it as 1 building. 
Tag a building just as building=yes. Nothing more. And square each rectangular building with the Q key.
Best regards
abakus_uploader (2023-01-05 23:31:56+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
ivanbranco (2023-01-06 22:23:00+00:00): Ciao Gabry, benvenut su OSM!

Solo un appunto: non aggiungere descrizioni (come "sentiero") come tag name=*. Che sia un sentiero si capisce già da highway=path. Se proprio devi aggiungere una descrizione per cui non esistono già dei tag codificati puoi utilizzare il tag description=*

Buon mapping :)
Dodko (2023-07-15 18:57:20+00:00): Do telefónneho čísla nepridávaj lomítko.
InsertUser (2023-01-08 02:06:11+00:00): Should read addr:substreet
surveyor54 (2023-01-05 14:34:11+00:00): CS: Grenzziehung nach Shapefile korrigiert und Tagging ergänzt.
vespex (2023-01-05 17:20:04+00:00): lets discuss in case of any advises
Layft Greater (2023-05-26 21:14:27+00:00): Hello vespex!

Thank you for your contribution to the OpenStreetMap. However, I have some improvements to your edit.

1) Roads with "ref" starting with E* should be mapped as secondary. Check a mapping convention on Cy OSM wiki page
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cyprus#Highways_in_Cyprus

2) I have checked E604 on Gov - it is secondary, not primary too.
vespex (2023-05-28 09:39:46+00:00): Hello Layft Greater!
My point was that OSM types or statuses are about truth on the ground and it's not always equal to government classification. Gov classification is just one of the sources, but only one for OSM. 
And this principle is applied in many countries like Greece https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Greece#Highways_in_Greece (primary is not only for roads with gov status 2, but also city-level link roads) or in the US (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dprimary#International_equivalence ) and so on.
And also this common OSM definition is already applied in Cyprus (like E323 and E207 and others in Larnaca, or many E* in Nicosia like E1003, E928, E115 etc.). Even Cyprus government maps show E* roads as primary (for example E113 on https://eservices.dls.moi.gov.cy/img/staticthumbnails/Lemesos_East_Eng.png and many others).
So these are the reasons to mark these roads as primary too, as they have a lot of traffic and are used as city-level connecting roads (and so not to just copy gov statuses). And I hope it's in line with the harmony of other Cyprus road statuses :)
euroPathfinder (2023-01-05 15:18:45+00:00): Hi Mijopa,
welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for your contribution. If you want to you can even precise the type of fitness station, refer to this article from the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dfitness_station
This is not mandatory, but a nice option - I'm not sure if you were aware of it hence my comment.

Kind regards
euroPathfinder
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130909534
kuhni74 (2023-01-05 23:00:34+00:00): Der Campingplatz war doch eh schon eingezeichnet?! Jetzt ist er doppelt...
Fanbneyl (2023-01-06 21:46:30+00:00): Ich finds halt grundsätzlich sinnvoller, wenn man ihn als Fläche und nicht als Punkt einzeichnet. Aber wenns stört kann ichs auch wieder rückgängig machen.
kuhni74 (2023-01-06 23:04:02+00:00): Er war vorher durchaus als Fläche eingezeichnet: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/85681172
Fanbneyl (2023-01-06 23:16:25+00:00): Mein Fehler, danke für den Hinweis! Ich werd meine Änderung wieder löschen.
ignaciolep (2023-01-16 12:09:33+00:00): Hola, ¡Gracias por tu aporte a OpenStreetMap! Me pregunto si la Calle 3 que agregaste realmente existe o solo está proyectada. Es importante recordar que en OpenStreetMap se mapean los elementos que realmente existen sobre el terreno. Te recomendamos leer las buenas prácticas de edición en el siguiente enlace: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenas_pr%C3%A1cticas#Mapear_lo_que_hay_sobre_el_terreno para asegurarte de estar mapeando correctamente.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130909552
AlejandroAlba (2023-01-16 14:31:32+00:00): Hola JLGANEM!  Bienvenido!. 
 Sumando al comentario anterior de Ignaciolep, tambien hay etiquetas alternativas que se pueden utilizar, ya sea carretera en construcción o carretera proyectada.
NorthCrab (2023-01-07 07:05:40+00:00): Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Uważaj aby nie duplikować adresów. Kiedy adres zostanie przypisany do obrysu budynku to należy go usunąć z wiszącego punktu.

Pozdrawiam!
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2023-01-10 23:52:52+00:00): Det giver ikke mening at sætte access=yes på trappen, Madsens Passage.

Det tillader cyklister, heste, biler osv på trappen
StC (2023-06-06 20:25:38+00:00): Hi,

could you please explain your intention for "De la Manche aux Pyrénées 23" in this changeset? This looks like a non-sourced, incomplete modification that leaves the route un-routable. But maybe I'm missing something? We all make that kind of mistakes, but then that's what messages are made for. When you read this, hopefully DWG will have directed your attention toward these changeset comments and we can can start talking between you and the French crowd about how we try to work as a group.
ma-rt-in (2023-01-05 20:13:10+00:00): Hey,

eigentlich bin ich nicht pingellich, aber habe mal gerade geschaut und die gesetzten 30er sind auf 140m angelegt, statt wie beschildert auf 100m.
Wäre nur ein nice to have, wenn du es anpasst, gerne auch ausgehend von den beiden Schildern auf 100m.

VG
un1matr1x (2023-01-06 14:07:30+00:00): Moin,
ohne auf einen anderen Editor als iD umsteigen wird es schwer die 100 m genau zu treffen (oder ich kenne die Funktion dafür nicht). Ich gehe davon aus, das dies mit JSOM entsprechend einfacher, schneller und genauer geht, falls du dies übernehmen möchtest, wäre es schön.
MfG
ma-rt-in (2023-01-06 16:31:20+00:00): Done.

VG
canfe (2023-01-05 16:05:56+00:00): La geometria è terribile. Hai già provato ad usare il tasto Q su ID?
Inoltre La gelateria andrebbe mappato come un punto che indica più o meno l'entrata della stessa e non tutto l'edificio che dovrebbe vivere coi sui tag...
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130910342
canfe (2023-01-05 16:05:57+00:00): La geometria è terribile. Hai già provato ad usare il tasto Q su ID?
Inoltre La gelateria andrebbe mappato come un punto che indica più o meno l'entrata della stessa e non tutto l'edificio che dovrebbe vivere coi sui tag...
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130910342
Muhmaker (2023-01-06 06:46:11+00:00): Moin,
in deinen Änderungen haben sich ein paar vermutlich ungewollte Fehler eingeschlichen. Auf diesem Wald-Multipolygon (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/326497530) ist eine ref eines Wanderweges ergänzt. Auf dieser Admin-Grenze (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/378371878) ist nun ein tracktype eingetragen. Auf diesem Schutzgebiets-MP (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/105745884) nochmal eine Wander-ref. Bitte korrigieren
DeFra85 (2023-01-06 06:57:28+00:00): Mein neues Tablet scheint so ne dämliche AutoFill-Macke zu haben.

Danke fürs drüber gucken!
Wenn du noch was findest sag Bescheid.
FraukeLeo (2023-02-26 16:44:02+00:00): Hallo ozgurakyazi, die Linksabbiegung auf die Rheinstraße https://osm.org/way/1127519228 ist schon seit Jahren abgebaut. Man kann dort nicht mehr nach links in die Rheinstraße abbiegen.
5m4u9 (2023-01-06 06:58:33+00:00): Hi, thanks for your edits.

In Bolivia, many (maybe all) train station building have "Estación" (station) included in the name.
gunnar1m (2023-01-06 08:14:42+00:00): Sorry it was a mistake. Worldwide it is so common: 
railway=station 
name=Villamontes. 

And for the building:
building=train_station
name=Estatión Villamontes
Yunan973 (2023-07-29 23:00:30+00:00): Bonjour,

êtes vous sûr que les amphithéatres sont des zones de spectacles pour voir des pièces de théâtres ? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:theatre:type=amphi
Ne serait pas plutôt des salles de cours ? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building=university

Cordialement
gscscnd (2023-01-06 08:26:35+00:00): Kiedy z niełamliwą jest bardziej poprawnie…
dzamper (2023-01-06 09:39:47+00:00): Wartość tagu network to tylko symbol tekstowy który ma reprezentować sieć, a nie dopieszczona językowo formalna nazwa jakiegoś podmiotu. Wybrałem po prostu wersję która miała więcej użyć, bo sztuczny podział na dwie różne sieci różniące się w symbolu tylko rodzajem jednej spacji jest bez sensu. Jeśli społeczność uważa że wersja z niełamliwą jest lepsza to niech tak będzie, ale przede wszystkim niech będzie jednolicie.
gscscnd (2023-01-06 17:00:13+00:00): Jeśli miała więcej użyć to czegoś nie dopilnowałem 😉 Rozumiem Twoją argumentację i dziękuję za uporządkowanie. Może kiedyś to przerobię — niełamliwa spacja nie jest tak trudna i kontrowersyjna jak kwestia U+002D kontra U+00AD/U+2010/U+2011 — ale zgadzam się, że spójność jest tutaj najważniejsza.
dzamper (2023-01-06 18:08:01+00:00): Jasne, dzięki za zrozumienie ;)
Palolo (2023-01-05 16:44:38+00:00): Please work to make square corners on the buildings.
You probably could trace several buildings before saving. Thank you
Pisto81 (2024-06-27 18:02:59+00:00): the two adjacent buildings are overlapping#OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130912866
Mir76 (2024-10-29 05:41:20+00:00): Это что за странные названия? Откуда их взяли?
V4slav (2024-10-30 16:04:09+00:00): Я с этих мест, с детства все их так называли. Есть другая информация?
Mir76 (2024-10-31 17:22:51+00:00): Вот прямо 11, 13, 15 и называли?
V4slav (2024-11-01 11:25:25+00:00): Да, одиннадцатая скалка, тринадчик, пятнадчик.  Там выше по течению девяткам еще. 
У Вас есть другая информация по этим скалкам?
Mir76 (2024-11-01 19:07:26+00:00): Нету. Первый раз вижу номерные скалы, ну пусть будут. Только их надо переделать из точки natural=peak в линию natural=cliff.
FF_Saulheim_Hydrant (2023-10-24 16:32:28+00:00): Nachtrag: Nr. 2A wurde aus dem Geo-Portal RLP übernommen.
sonuxn (2023-01-05 16:21:34+00:00): Nice
sonuxn (2023-01-05 16:31:59+00:00): Ulaheri Bus stand ok
euroPathfinder (2023-01-09 17:58:40+00:00): Hi Freya Oliver,
Please try to limit your edits to local areas. Applying changes to a large area will trigger a lot of surveilling users and make it really hard to track possible problems.

Kind regards,
euroPathfinder
NorthCrab (2023-01-05 20:52:13+00:00): This changeset is correct. Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Don't hesitate with requesting a review in the future if in doubt. Cheers.
little_maper (2023-01-09 11:40:19+00:00): Hello Lamassu;
I see you changed the classification to unsuitable classification and
These links should be changed from "tertiary_link" to "primary_link".
Links:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/421113488
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/82575360
For more information's on How to use classifications for links in OpenStreetMap:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dprimary_link
Could you fix it, please?
Regards
little_maper
user_12523467 (2023-01-09 11:50:04+00:00): Hello little_maper;
I'll fix it, thank you
Regards
little_maper (2023-01-09 14:32:07+00:00): Thank you
silversurfer83 (2023-01-05 16:39:12+00:00): Hi there :)
Thanks for contributing to OSM and helping HOT.
You checked the "review requested" box and I'd like to help, but your changes cover a large area of the globe which makes it hard for the ususal tools which visualise them to load your changes.
So my advice should you feel unsure about your work: Keep every changeset geographically small (especially DON'T jump continents) and make smaller changes. This makes it easier for others to check what you did :)
Even better would be to include the source of your changes.

Happy mapping
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130914022
Jacksonville (2026-02-06 21:55:05+00:00): Hi Kautilya3. Thank you for adding some of the locations in GB? I've been looking through records for the "Punsa" village, but I have not come across any. Which sources did you use, may I ask?
tux67 (2023-01-06 08:16:40+00:00): Hallo zarnilux,
willkommen bei Openstreetmap und danke, dass du mithelfen möchtest, die Kartendaten zu verbessern.
Ich sehe dich viele Änderungen und Notes via Streetcomplete machen. Allerdings ist es nicht hilfreich dieses Tool zu nutzen, ohne die Orte wirklich abzulaufen (nicht für Armchairmapping nutzen) und besonders sollte man die Grundsätze von OSM verstanden haben.
Hier hast du zum Beispiel die gleichen Tags an den Stop Node und die Platform gehängt - diese Art der Redundanz ist kontraproduktiv. In der Masse in der du die Änderungen machst, kann man das auch kaum auf Konsistenz prüfen. Vielleicht liest du dich erst mal ein. z.B.: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:public_transport%3Dplatform
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:public_transport%3Dstop_position

Eine gute allgemeine Einführung zu OSM gibts z.B. hier: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Solltest du Fragen haben oder Hilfe benötigen, dann kannst du dich gerne bei mir oder im Forum melden:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/de/56
Für eine Qualitätssicherung, an der sich alle Mapper in der Gegend beteiligen können - bitte antworte - wenn notwendig - immer hier im Änderungssatz mit der Kommentarfunktion.
Viel Spaß beim Mappen wünscht tux67
ticki_52 (2023-08-18 14:43:28+00:00): Mir ist nicht klar, was hinter dem Eintrag "architect= (name)" als Information zum Gebäude steckt. Wenn dort ein Büro ist, dann wäre wohlein node  "office=architect" + name = ....". Bitte mal prüfen und ggf. ändern. Danke