piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_5359 (2025-04-25 11:41:16+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1380615363. What is mean of the tag 116 = 179?
SpinOff (2025-04-25 18:44:57+00:00): Upewnij się czy ta edycja nie łamie zasady opisanej w paragrafie "Nazwa jest tylko nazwą" na tej stronie: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Nazwy
soshial (2025-09-17 17:59:28+00:00): Thanks a lot for adding all platforms! I wonder whether we can also add `ref` tag there (in addition to `loc_ref`)? WDYT?
soshial (2025-09-17 18:00:38+00:00): Ah, I got it. `ref ` would be the ID of a bus stop, not the platform number.
rskedgell (2025-04-24 10:54:36+00:00): The operator of St. Edmund's Church of England Primary School had been set incorrectly by another mapper as Kent County Council. That isn't your fault.

You accepted the tagging "upgrade" suggestion by Rapid that you change the operator:type from religious to government and added Kent County Council's Wikidata ref. Instead of fixing a problem caused by a tagging error, you chose to hide it instead of resolving the obvious contradiction.

Open data about schools in England is available from the government's "Get Information About Schools" service.
https://get-information-schools.service.gov.uk/Establishments/Establishment/Details/130948

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/967534396

Please fix your error.
rskedgell (2025-05-05 17:16:56+00:00): I see that you have changed "The Oasts Business Village" from office=administrative to office=government. The original tag isn't in the wiki, but replacing it in an automated edit with a value which is obviously wrong is unhelpful.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5060905412
rskedgell (2025-04-24 10:43:05+00:00): (Review requested)

Thanks for updating this. You'll also need to add shop=fishing so that data consumers know what it is - see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dfishing
rskedgell (2025-04-24 10:39:37+00:00): There are several sections of the A429 Bearsted Road which had been tagged in error with crossing=no.

Rapid suggested that you add crossing:markings=no + crossing:signals=no, which you did without considering whether this could be correct (no, it couldn't). This didn't fix the problem, but it might have hidden it from someone else.

If you're unquestioningly accepting every suggested tagging "upgrade", you're not "fixing various issues", you're effectively making an automated/mechanical edit of questionable value.

The number of objects edited in each changeset also makes it hard to find how many errors are hidden amongst the hundreds of correct tagging suggestions.

Bearsted Road actually fixed in
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165371890
OlasMapy (2026-07-03 13:04:13+00:00): "Narwa" is the correct transliteration of the Estonian and Russian name of the city in German[1]. Are you gonna consider EVEN TRANSLITERATIONS historical names? And no, your cited "UN recommendations" won't fit here as a) if a name is used in one language then it should be tagged under the language[2] b) this is a transliteration so it would comply with those "UN recommendations" c) "Narva" in German would sound something like "Narfa".
1. https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kyrillisches_Alphabet#Russisch
2. https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Narwa_(miasto) ; https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Narva_(Stadt) ; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Narva#cite_note-5 
This changeset will be reverted.
Pikse (2026-07-04 07:11:13+00:00): What you say makes no sense. Estonian language is written in Latin script, and does not need to te transliterated into German. Also these cities are located in Estonia, and Russian is not official/local language in Estonia.

"Narva" in German language is an exonym like any other containing letter 'v'. E.g. name for the US state Nevada is not "tranlisterated" into German as "Newada".

As for the old name vs. "still used" argument, well, this is again not supported by Wikipedia usage that you refer to, and strong evidence would be need to show that (old) exonym "Narwa" is still actually more common than an endonym in German language.

The UN/KNSG recommendation quoted earlier was: "original names [endonyms] should be used in all doubtful cases". This is relevant here as well.
OlasMapy (2026-07-04 21:33:07+00:00): Narva is an ENDONYM not an exonym. The official name in German may be Narva, but the colloquial name that's actually used by people is of course Narva. Same with all other names you deleted in Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania and Russia. We should set multilingual names to actually used by the PEOPLE, not just the officials.
Also, your last argument seems pointless because
1. If such thing was a case, that would require a massive global revert of multilingual names. That includes all existing German names in Poland and other countries where German is not the official language except for standardised names,
2. Names in the Królewiec region aren't actually original names. Those are actually in old Prussian or German. Also, original names that have been used for centuries outnumber the transliterations or endonyms.

If you disagree with this comment, go ahead and revert ALL unstandardised names in ALL languages.
OlasMapy (2026-07-04 21:36:04+00:00): Also German doesn't include characters such as Š š Ž ž Õ õ Ā ā Č č Ē ē Ģ ģ Ī ī Ķ ķ Ļ ļ Ņ ņ Ū ū Ą ą Ę ę Ė ė Į į Ų ų so don't even consider endonyms as exonyms in German.
Pikse (2026-07-05 07:51:40+00:00): Yes, sorry, "Narva" is of course an endonym. This is what I meant where I compared it with "Nevada", and this aligns with what I said afterwards about old name (exonym) and about UN recommendation.

This again isn't really about me personally not agreeing with you. This is about OSM community consensus (as established in recent Community Forum topic), and about general cartographic principles (as reflected in the UN/KSNG recommendation).

Without any credible usage anaysis you keep repeating that this or that old exonym is what people actually and still use but this in itself doesn't make it more true.

Obviously current use of "name:de" in Poland is problematic but I don't think it is my responsibility to sort this out. For places in Poland there are more German exonyms that are still more common than endonyms but probably not nearly as many as suggested by current OSM data. Others in fact have reverted your similar edits in Poland as well but annoyingly you keep coming back under new names and new sockpuppet accounts to get your way.

You have been told multiple times and by many people, including in DWG block message, that you shouldn't use OSM with narrow agenda to promote and revive old names. There's no need to waste everyone's time by starting the same discussion over and over.
OlasMapy (2026-07-05 14:22:15+00:00): "new sockpuppet accounts"
My only accounts are the one I am using right now and my alt account that I use StreetComplete with. Who do you think I am, Otzi?
" I don't think it is my responsibility to sort this out"
If you want to sort this out then go ahead, do a global revert of multilingual names.
Old exonyms are for example "Kamienica Saska" for Chemitz, which I have already tagged under old_name:pl. But exonyms for larger cities such as Vilnius (Wilna in german), Riga, Tallinn, Daugavpils (Dunaburg) are still in vigorous use by travel agencies, TV channels, ordinary people, see https://www.reddit.com/r/WidacZabory/comments/1udr04i/comment/otm7x0i/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button https://ciekawostkihistoryczne.pl/2026/06/05/konigsberg-kaliningrad-miasto-na-krancu-swiata/ https://easteurotopo.org/indices/view/view.php?map=kdwrindex&section=Dunaburg etc. If that bothers you so much, why don't tag those names under name:de and endonyms under official_name:de?
Pikse (2026-07-05 18:50:09+00:00): To anyone else reading this, related Community Forum discussion was this: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/whats-everyones-problem-with-name-de/142456

You are not saying anything new that you/Otzi (and yes, there is a strong behavioural evidence that you are the same person) already didn't say in that discussion and in numerous other recent changeset discussions on exactly the same matter in response to numerous other users.

Throwing links that point to random internet pages is as unhelpful as it was before. Number of users have responded and told you what kinds of names and why are expected under "name:de". It is your problem if you don't care to read, or if you generally care only about your own narrow agenda to push old names.
OlasMapy (2026-07-05 19:26:54+00:00): Firstly, I live in Poland, Otzi lives somewhere around Frankfurt.
Also Wikipedia, the most popular encyclopedia, has german names separated and in bold, so I wouldn't consider those names "random".
Pikse (2026-07-05 19:52:31+00:00): Sure, we already know you live everywhere where you need to claim to have local knowledge (Otzi also claimed to live in Poland, and in Klaipeda area, and in Kaliningrad as Иван2026 etc.).

Wikipedia was also discussed already multiple times. It just records some old exonyms but at the same prefers endonyms for places in question.

By the way, not sure if you noticed but your knee-jerk revert also results in "Kochtel-Türpsal" being reinstated for Kohtla-Järve. This is a neologism put together from German names of historic Kohtla (Kochtel) and Järve (Türpsal) manors. Likely it was never used for more recent city in any reliable source, and shouldn't be recorded as an old name either.
OlasMapy (2026-07-05 21:39:52+00:00): "Wikipedia was also discussed already multiple times. It just records some old exonyms but at the same prefers endonyms for places in question."
As for that, the german wikipedia has stated that the title always has to be the endonym and the actual german exonym to be highlighted, for example: Vilnius, deutsch Wilna. From what I can see here, "Wilna" seems to be the exonym.
"Sure, we already know you live everywhere where you need to claim to have local knowledge (Otzi also claimed to live in Poland, and in Klaipeda area, and in Kaliningrad as Иван2026 etc.)."
I don't actually have local knowledge of the area. I just check sources such as Wikipedia, Duden, etc. If you see my edits then they are mostly fixing stuff around my hometown of Bydgoszcz, because that's where I live. I also have GPS traces and StreetComplete editions as proof, see my alt account: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/olas%20%E2%88%92%20alt%20konto%20do%20uwag
Pikse (2026-07-06 11:10:11+00:00): Again, this already was discussed extensively. As a told to you also by others: it is not needed to just verify that an exonym exists, in Duden or whatever source. It is needed to establish that in modern usage an exonym is clearly more common than an endonym. Some exonyms are more common and are preferred due to this reason. The problem is just that the number of such exonyms is much smaller than you'd like it to be.

In the meantime I've reverted your edit to these two label nodes. I'll report to DWG if you continue to push old names in this manner.
OlasMapy (2026-07-06 12:25:24+00:00): Exonyms for larger cities such as Narva, Talinn, Riga, Vilnius, Kaliningrad etc are actually more common than endonyms. Most sources report Vilnius as Wilna, Riga as Riga, Kaliningrad as Konigsberg, etc. For villages/small towns I agree that those names are no longer in  use, but for cities they are.
"Narwa" fully qualifies here. It's only one letter that fixes phonetics in German + this is a valid transliteration of the Russian name, and, according to Wikipedia, 87% of the city's inhabitants are Russian.
If "name:de" concerns you so much, then why not tag it under alt_name:de as in Klaipeda/Memel?
Pikse (2026-07-06 13:34:19+00:00): You only keep saying so repeatedly ("most sources report") without making any proper usage analysis, or otherwise without backing your claims with anything. You like to ignore the fact that it is also easy to find German language sources that instead use endonyms, for larger cities in particular as these are mentioned more often.

Wikipedia guidelines mention Wortschatz-Lexikon[1] that can be used to get some actual overview on usage counts of different name variants. As per this source "Tallinn" and "Vilnius" are a lot more common than respective endonyms in recent and more reliable sources. "Kaliningrad" and "Narva" are also more common. Endonym "Rīga" clearly is not but no one suggested this should be preferred anyway.

[1] https://corpora.uni-leipzig.de/
Pikse (2026-07-06 13:38:25+00:00): Correction: as per this source "Tallinn" and "Vilnius" are a lot more common than respective exonyms (not endonyms)
OlasMapy (2026-07-06 20:54:33+00:00): The page in question doesn't show anything when it comes to "Vilnius", "Wilna", etc when searched
OlasMapy (2026-07-06 20:59:40+00:00): Also, for Windau/Ventspils, the former is listed as the German name.
Pikse (2026-07-07 08:57:58+00:00): I don't know, might a problem with your web browser. If I search e.g. German news outlets from 2025 it gives 1486 results for "Vilnius" and only 20 results for "Wilna" (most of which are mentions in historical context or just in different sense).
OlasMapy (2026-07-07 12:23:26+00:00): Wort: vilnius
keine Ergebnisse
Wort: riga
keine Ergebnisse
Wort: ventspils
keine Ergebnisse
Wort: tallinn
keine Ergebnisse
I searched on the website (https://corpora.uni-leipzig.de/)
OlasMapy (2026-07-07 12:28:34+00:00): By the way, I searched for the name using a prompt (Duck.ai GPT5.4 to be exact), citing 3 sites mentioning the name "Wilna" in the foreground (nostly tour sites) and 1 site mentioning "Vilnius" (mostly related to geopolitics/foreign relations).
---------------------------
Hier sind ein paar deutsche Seiten, die die Schreibweise „Vilnius“ und/oder „Wilna“ verwenden, und ein kurzer Vergleich, worin sich die Verwendung unterscheidet:

Lernhelfer.de (Schülerlexikon): „Wilna (Vilnius) – Hauptstadt Litauens“
Nutzt „Wilna“ als deutschen Städtenamen, klärt aber direkt die Verbindung zu „Vilnius“. 
lernhelfer.de
OME-lexikon (Uni Oldenburg): „Wilna/Vilnius“
Führt beide Varianten als gleichwertige Benennungen in einem Lexikonartikel („Deutsche Bezeichnung: Wilna“, „lit. Vilnius“) und ordnet sie typologisch ein. 
uni-oldenburg.de
GetYourGuide (Reiseunterkunft/Guides): „Wilna“ als Tour-/Zielbezeichnung
Verwendet „Wilna“/„Vilnius“ eher als Reisebegriff in Angeboten (Marketing-/Reiseziel-Kontext), ohne sprachhistorische Einordnung. 
getyourguide.de
Herder-Institut (Marburg): „… in Vilnius …“
Nutzt überwiegend „Vilnius“ (vor allem im wissenschaftlich/englischsprachig-kontextualisierten Material), und „Wilna“ tritt hier nicht als Haupttitelvariante in den sichtbaren Auszügen hervor. 
herder-institut.de
Vergleich (kurz):

„Wilna“ dominiert eher in deutschsprachigen Darstellungen/Einführungen (Lexikon/Schulkontext) als deutscher Name.
„Vilnius“ dominiert eher in international/neutrale(n) oder wissenschaftlichen Schreibweisen bzw. wenn der litauische Name im Vordergrund steht.
In Reiseseiten werden beide Varianten oft gemischt oder synonym genutzt, primär zur Auffindbarkeit.
Wenn du willst, suche ich dir noch gezielter (z.B. nur .de-Universitäten/Archive, nur Zeitungen, oder nur Seiten, die beide Begriffe im Fließtext verwenden).
---------------------------
Conclusion: name:de=Wilna, official_name:de=Vilnius
OlasMapy (2026-07-07 12:31:05+00:00): Same for cities in Ukraine, where this was already debated, see changeset/172150201 and https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/name-de-kyjiw-oder-wie/109713
Pikse (2026-07-07 13:08:13+00:00): This explains it. The search on given site is case-sensitve, so you need to search for "Vilnius", not "vilnius".

This AI analysis says hardly anything substantial compared to Wortschatz. It just tosses around a couple of cherry-picked sources, of which at least one is for historical context. If anything, it once again only proves what we knew all along – an exonym exists.

These Ukraine cases as far as I can see are irrelevant. That other changeset discussion only provides opinion by one other user, reciting again several obvious misconceptions and again contradicting broader consensus established in recent Comminity Forum topic, and the other case is specific to Kiev.
OlasMapy (2026-07-07 13:27:46+00:00): Again, this is used mostly in geopolitical context (like Kyjiw, Lwiw). When Germans actually want to see the city, they use Wilna instead of Vilnius. You have to see where actual colloquial usage of the cities applies.
OlasMapy (2026-07-07 13:38:01+00:00): "It just tosses around a couple of cherry-picked sources, of which at least one is for historical context."
Well, those are not historical context. I checked the sites. It is known on those sites as "Wilna (Vilnius)".
OlasMapy (2026-07-07 13:39:43+00:00): So, if an exonym is truly less used than an endonym, then all not standardized names in Polish in the Baltic states, in Ukraine, etc, should go to old_name:pl, yet you didn't touch this key.
Pikse (2026-07-07 14:08:42+00:00): There's no point to repeat claims that have been proven false and/or are not backed by anything ("Germans actually /.../ use Wilna").

Obviously Ukraine's capital is mentioned most often in geopolitical context these days (unlike travel destination like Venice) but I don't see what the preferred name variant has got to do with geopolitics. Exonym "Kiew" still is the most common name variant also in context of geopolitics, as shown in forum thread that you referred and suggested also by Wortschatz.

Colloquial language in someone's person bubble can be whatever but analysis of common usage at the end needs to be based on something reliable. It is also unclear why colloquial language, whatever it actually is, should take precedence in OSM.
OlasMapy (2026-07-07 14:58:24+00:00): https://www.duden.de/rechtschreibung/Wilna https://www.lernhelfer.de/schuelerlexikon/geografie/artikel/wilna-vilnius-hauptstadt-litauens https://ome-lexikon.uni-oldenburg.de/orte/wilna-vilnius Here are some examples. Duden lists both Wilna and Vilnius.
Taya_S (2026-07-07 16:10:49+00:00): Hello OlasMapy,

In the past you've already repeatedly ran into trouble by misusing the various name tags. In order to prevent this, I would suggest you start a forum thread whenever you run into people having issues with your name edits. This is the best way to ensure that the wider OSM community has a chance to look at the name changes you are proposing and make sure a good outcome gets reached.

Please also note just a dictionary entry existing or a link to a website that directly states that a certain name isn't in common use anymore generally aren't considered a very strong reasons to put a name in the main name:xx tag.

Best regards,  
Taya Snijder,  
On behalf of the OSMF Data Working Group
SomeoneElse (2025-05-05 10:21:58+00:00): I suspect that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/521292120/history is not any sort of storage tank - by the name and the location I suspect it is a filter bed in a sewage works.
woodpeck_repair (2025-04-24 09:48:49+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 154761183, 154807830, 154807850, 154807874, 154807892.
woodpeck_repair (2025-04-24 09:48:50+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 154761183, 154807830, 154807850, 154807874, 154807892.
osmviborg (2025-04-24 10:58:55+00:00): way/1305357825 was deleted, now look at crossing. This is a mess.
osmviborg (2025-04-24 10:50:23+00:00): Are you sure about this?
czubi (2025-05-22 09:08:44+00:00): Mal Interessehalber, wann ist es historic und wann ist es artwork? Ich meine die Statuen im Molsdorfer Garten.
Rongel (2025-05-22 12:08:46+00:00): Oh, das ist eine gute Frage. Wann ist etwas historisch, diese Frage stelle ich mir auch immer wieder. Schloss Molsdorf mit Park ist ein Kulturdenkmal in Thüringen, da ist historic eindeutig zuordenbar. Bei den Skulpturen ist es da schon eine individuelle Betrachtung was wichtiger ist, das historische Werk oder das Kunstwerk selbst. Leider sind von den vielen Skulpturen aus dem 18. Jh. nicht mehr viele übrig (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Schloss-Molsdorf_Lapidarium-T_20240620_093331.jpg). Vielleicht war es die Idee sie als historic zu kennzeichnen, das ist aber sicher nicht zwingend erforderlich. Schließlich handelt es sich bei den Skulpturen nicht um eigenständige Kulturdenkmäler in Thüringen oder um andere erinnerungswürdige historische Objekte wie Mahnmal oder vielleicht Denkmal.
Es sind Skulpturen aus dem 18. Jh., wenn es sich um Kunstwerke des 20. Jahrhunderts handeln würde, wäre historic eher unpassend. So gesehen wären Diese Skulpturen ohne historic sicher auch i.O.
aceman444 (2025-05-02 18:30:22+00:00): Zdravim, to co su vsetky tie alternativne nazvy https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1380625217 ? Nie su to v roznych jazykoch? Potom dajte napr. alt_name:pl . Ak su to vsetko slovenskej, dajte ich do alt_name, oddelene bodkociarkou.
Dimitar155 (2025-04-24 10:10:46+00:00): По бул. Никола Вапцаров има две ленти за ляв завой към Атанас Дуков и две ленти за направо. По-голямата част от трафика минава по Дуков. По ОУП Дуков е заложен като основното трасе за трафика (макар и по друга следа).

На МС Витоша, голяма част от трафика е по направлението Сребърна - Черни връх (и оттам към СОП или по третия градски ринг), поради което направих и предната промяна.
Ethan Grobin (2025-04-24 10:06:39+00:00): note #4710009
eggie (2025-04-24 10:52:15+00:00): Hi Navazor..
Please add also office=company or something else for rendering.
Greetz. 
eggie
eggie (2025-04-24 11:29:33+00:00): office=it added
fx99 (2025-08-05 19:43:57+00:00): Wenn mehr als die Hälfte der Fläche nicht dem Tag entspricht, ist das keine korrekte Flächennutzung. 
Hauptverkehrsweg mit landuses zu überdecken, macht keinen Sinn.
Arnaud Champollion (2025-04-27 18:32:41+00:00): Il y passe encore à cet endroit ?
Je crois que les lignes n'y montent plus depuis l'année dernière.
Shubham_M (2025-04-24 10:19:24+00:00): i want this data for the my collage study
literan (2025-04-24 20:26:51+00:00): name:ru	Улица Большая Дмитровка

здесь "улица" должно быть с маленькой буквы. Ознакомьтесь с руководством, пожалуйста:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BE%D0%B1_%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3#%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%BF%D0%B8%D1%81%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%83%D1%81%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B9_%D1%87%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B8
silversurfer83 (2025-04-25 15:09:52+00:00): Hi :)

du hast darum gebeten, dass sich jemand diese Änderung ansieht. Ich mach das mal und hätte entsprechend Anmerkungen und Fragen:

- In Freigericht hast du das Gebäude der AW-Offsetdruck geändert. Auf dem Luftbild sehe ich ein Gebäude, du hast nun eine Fläche daraus gemacht (area=yes). Das dürfte nicht der Realität entsprechen.
Ein Kollege hat das mittlerweile etwas angepasst und auch die beiden hier ansässigen Firmen etwas schicker erfasst: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165412024
Vielleicht hilft dir das Beispiel bei zukünftigen Änderungen. Grundsätzlich ist es hilfreich Firmen als eigene Punkte oder mit der gesamten Betriebsfläche zu erfassen, statt den Namen an das Gebäude zu schreiben.

- du hast hier in Freigericht und Leipzig gearbeitet. Das ist geografisch schon weit auseinander. Besser wäre hier zwei getrennte Änderungen durchzuführen:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

- Auch in Leipzig wäre es besser die Firma auf einen eigenen Punkt zu ziehen.

- Bei Fragen immer raus damit. Auch das Wiki hat unter wiki.osm.org sehr viele Antworten.

cheers
silversurfer83
SGA_IBAK (2025-04-28 07:18:22+00:00): Hi silversurfer83,

vielen Dank für deine Rückmeldungen!

Das in Freigericht und Leipzig war in der Tat so gewollt wie durch euch in angepassten Version wunderbar gelöst. Ich werde ich mir für zukünftige Anpassungen merken und auch das Wiki nochmal zur Gemüte führen.

Danke und Gruß
Sascha
Abdikaani (2025-04-24 10:33:00+00:00): excellence
EduKehakettu (2025-06-22 12:17:05+00:00): Mikä on Kiltapuiston lähde?
liljaadeliina (2025-08-13 06:53:14+00:00): Muistan sukulaisteni puhuneen Kiltapuistosta nuorempana ja lisäsin sen kartalle karkeasti.