piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
McPomHH (2025-12-28 12:06:06+00:00): Du hast die Linien Wendemuthstraße und Rüterstraße über den gemeinsamen Kreuzungspunkt hinaus verlängert. Dazu waren alle Relationen, die diese Kreuzung nutzten, kaputt.

Ich habe so ein Vorgehen noch nie erlebt und habe auch keine Ahnung, wie sowas für Rad- und Fußwege nötig gewesen sein soll. Ich habe die Buslinien wieder repariert, kann aber nicht ausschließen, dass andere Relationen ebenso defekt sind.
Openminded320 (2025-12-28 12:39:40+00:00): Ok, Sorry noch mal und Danke das Du aufgepasst hast.
VG
Rainero (2026-03-30 18:57:19+00:00): Revert changeset/180643601
wegen nicht zulässiger Quelle (Bayernatlas).
𒂼𒄄　 (2026-01-17 02:35:25+00:00): لماذا قمت بحذف الاسم العربي من هذه النقطة؟   
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7389453085/history
Fizzie-DWG (2025-12-27 22:18:35+00:00): DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176506507
JobeKremmer (2026-01-02 02:44:14+00:00): Nice!
Fizzie-DWG (2025-12-27 22:18:36+00:00): DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176506507
JobeKremmer (2026-01-02 02:43:58+00:00): Cool
user_5359 (2025-12-28 09:47:38+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on  https://www.osm.org/way/1462150294. What is the mean of your tags?
Fizzie-DWG (2025-12-27 22:16:14+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19229
eggie (2025-12-28 11:23:50+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Frans S (2026-02-13 15:56:25+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
As an experienced mapper, you should know that the highway tag "track is never to be used in residential areas. Check the relevant wiki's
Best regards
 Best regards
𒂼𒄄　 (2026-01-17 02:33:06+00:00): ماهو مصدرلك لتغيير اسم هذا المتجر في هذه النقطتين؟
     
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6512245173/history     
     
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9787700817/history     
     
لماذا قمت بكتابه اسم المتجر بطريقة تختلف عن كتابتها من الشركة الام؟
https://team-mart.com/
ڕاستی (2026-03-13 05:43:51+00:00): برالە نازانم چت نووسییە، یان بە کوردی بنووسە یانیش بە ئینگلیزی، هەتا بزانم چ دەرێی.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-26 19:29:58+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags/values, as a building inside another building, in changeset 184663568

https://osm.org/changeset/184663568
PeeWee32 (2026-03-02 19:13:08+00:00): Hoi Stephsoft. Je hebt op de soesterweg een foot=use_sidepath   toegevoegd waardoor deze weg voor voetgangers niet meer toegankelijk is geworden. Er lopen zelfs nog wandelroutes over de weg. Dat kan m.i. niet de bedoeling zijn. Foutje?  Kan die foot=use_sidepath  weg?  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/704972569/history#map=19/52.155815/5.365513
Stephsoft (2026-03-05 15:57:15+00:00): Oeps, dat heb ik inderdaad verkeerd ingevoerd. Ik heb het weggehaald!
eggie (2026-03-05 16:36:22+00:00): Hoi,

Van het vervolg heb ik ook nog foot=use_sidepath verwijderd.

Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=176507692

MVG
eggie
JoeG (2025-12-30 23:39:01+00:00): Hi again. This changeset has footway=sidewalk deleted on 4 ways. As for the other changeset, is there a reason for this?
DeanBA (2025-12-31 12:52:28+00:00): No sidewalks have been deleted. All footpaths are in place wherever they exist
NeisBot (2025-12-28 07:41:37+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 7 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/397163928 v16 | 4 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=176508071
JoeG (2025-12-30 23:37:06+00:00): Hi again. This changeset has footway=sidewalk deleted on 4 ways. As for the other changesets, is there a reason for this?
DeanBA (2025-12-31 12:50:51+00:00): No sidewalks have been deleted. Footpaths are in place wherever they are located
𒂼𒄄　 (2026-01-17 02:31:25+00:00): ماهو مصدرلك لتغيير اسم هذا المتجر؟
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4465516889/history#map=19/36.188231/43.958973    
لماذا قمت بكتابه اسم المتجر بطريقة تختلف عن كتابتها من الشركة الام؟  
https://team-mart.com/
trial (2026-04-17 11:58:16+00:00): Salut, sauf erreur https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/42599093#map=19/48.415176/-4.434960&layers=N est fermé
Ce que confirme https://www.armorlux.com/pages/nos-magasins (était géré avec celui de Kergaradec rue Gaston Planté)
Guixovitch (2026-04-17 12:08:32+00:00): Salut, en effet j'avais ajouté Armor lux il y a 3 ans, mais cette boutique est fermée désormais, je crois que les locaux sont vacants désormais.
trial (2026-04-17 12:46:37+00:00): Vacants, c'est ce qui est le plus probable. Je sais qu'ils fermaient, mais je ne suis pas passé depuis devant pour voir ce que c'est devenu.
Source pour rire et pas pour cartographier : 
https://www.google.com/maps/place/Armor-Lux/@48.4153346,-4.4355312,3a,15y,156.26h,88.39t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sKCHthtDq8XESGXJUcRjwsA!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fcb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26pitch%3D1.605985511276188%26panoid%3DKCHthtDq8XESGXJUcRjwsA%26yaw%3D156.25619426241272!7i16384!8i8192!4m6!3m5!1s0x4816bbdd41c2d41b:0xb2e192e2f0c70d15!8m2!3d48.415238!4d-4.435357!16s%2Fg%2F11h1hqh3lk?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI2MDQxNC4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D
Visiblement fermé et textuellement ouvert, c'est un concept...
NeisBot (2025-12-28 07:41:42+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 16 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/974849125 v1 | 6 crossings
https://osm.org/way/886803692 v2 | 5 crossings
https://osm.org/way/974849124 v1 | 5 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/9021437784 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=176510066
NeisReview (2026-01-07 17:34:05+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/176650449
NeisBot (2025-12-28 07:41:42+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 9 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/974849125 v2 | 6 crossings
https://osm.org/way/974849105 v1 | 3 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/9021372909 v3
https://osm.org/node/13230388787 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=176510175
schobbish (2026-01-19 22:57:18+00:00): Hi there, this changeset appears to be unproductive or made by mistake. I will be reverting this for you after this comment is 24 hours old.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176510527
schobbish (2026-01-21 00:31:36+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177499916
Glassman (2025-12-28 17:07:52+00:00): The MS buildings were created some time ago and often skewed so I would recommend updating them. JOSM has tools to make it quicker to fix so I usually import them via Rapid and then fix them with JOSM.
agodber (2025-12-28 17:58:50+00:00): Thanks for the suggestion, I hadn't realized I could switch tools on a changeset.  I will look into that workflow.
Glassman (2025-12-28 19:20:03+00:00): Not exactly. You'll need to save and upload from Rapid then open the same area in JOSM to fix the buildings.
AgusQui (2025-12-31 05:07:00+00:00): NO eliminar estas rutas! Pasarlas a DISUSED!
Ya te lo expliqué varias veces, no sabes a con certeza que va a pasar a futuro y estas relaciones son complicadas de revertir.
El ramal Puente Saavedra lo suelen suspender en el verano, te lo dije el otro día.
Frans S (2026-01-19 15:36:51+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please use the default tagging for buildings. 'building = yes, nothing else, nothing more.
Best regards
acarasimon96 (2025-12-28 04:04:52+00:00): Not sure where the Wikidata and Wikipedia tags should go: do I add them to the building itself, the religious area, or both?
ieguy3 (2025-12-28 06:45:43+00:00): https://ceqanet.lci.ca.gov/2024051174/2
NeisBot (2025-12-28 07:45:13+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13412750594 v1

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Math tutoring center"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description
NeisBot (2026-01-02 11:09:28+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/176518364
Thanks @user_5359
arjunaraoc (2026-01-01 11:25:33+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176515431
arjunaraoc (2026-01-01 11:37:32+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176515431
szija (2026-01-12 10:24:31+00:00): Szervusz! Az előző szerkesztő vagyok. Ezek nem épületrészek, hanem külőnálló épületek, viszont sajnos mindegyik ugyanazt a címet viseli.
vasony (2026-01-14 19:34:22+00:00): Szia! 
Bocs hogy nem válaszoltam, látom a mátrixon is írtál, 

Ahogy írták, nem szerencsés ha 4 külön háznak is ugyanaz a címe, esetleg ha addr:unittal meg tudnánk a részeket különböztetni akkor vissza lehetne írni building:part-tól building-re.

Tamás
szija (2026-01-15 14:29:02+00:00): Kedves Tamás!

Köszönöm a válaszodat. Ugyan hivatalosan nincsenek megkülönböztetve, de akár lehetne őket számozni.

Üdv.:
Levente
arjunaraoc (2026-01-03 01:45:27+00:00): Hello Harshavardhan3091,  What is the source for renaming MDR as MDR049? It will help others to validate your editing and also let others join you in improving the map.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176515599
ieguy3 (2025-12-28 07:55:42+00:00): https://www.rctc.org/projects/mid-county-parkway-ramona/
ieguy3 (2025-12-28 07:57:31+00:00): the portion between sierra vista elementary to warren street is planned to start construction next year for freeway

"Final design of an 8.6-mile segment on Ramona Expressway from approximately one mile east of Rider Street to Warren Road in the County of Riverside began in fall 2022 and construction could begin in early 2026."
lmagreault (2025-12-29 10:41:06+00:00): Merci pour la correction de la ref.
Qu'apporte le changement de format de l'horaire ? Lié aux données d'origine ?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176516238
LudovicG (2025-12-30 14:39:21+00:00): Bonjour,
La Poste a défini une levée "semaine" et une levée "samedi". Sur les boîtes aux lettres, on retrouve cette distinction (surtout quand les horaires sont différents :D ).
Dans l'immédiat, cela peut permettre à un débutant de modifier (si évolution) une heure de levée sans s'embourber à comprendre ce format.
A terme, l'idée serait de pouvoir confronter facilement les données OSM et les données Datanova concernant les heures de levée.
bsmith94 (2026-05-20 17:37:22+00:00): Hi, just noticed the name change on this road. I'm pretty sure the name "Bog and Vly" is the correct expanded name, but since your edit is tagged survey I wanted to check what you based the name change on.
thedarkcave215 (2026-05-20 20:56:02+00:00): I’m pretty sure one of the street signs there said it was Bog & Valley, but I’m not from that part of New Jersey so I could certainly be wrong.
bsmith94 (2026-05-20 21:41:57+00:00): Ok, thanks. I'm local so I'll resurvey and update if needed, I want to head that way anyway to make sure I tag the water crossing at the west end correctly.
SafwatHalaby (2026-01-02 09:05:44+00:00): שלום! כשמשנים שם, יש לעדכן גם את Name וגם את Hebrew Name. בשינוי הזה עדכנת רק את ה-Name.
SafwatHalaby (2026-01-02 09:12:24+00:00): נא להקפיד לשנות שמות רחוב כמו שסיכמנו בפורום:

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/osm/128745/49


בנוסף, האם Major Ido הוא תרגום רשמי, שאפשר למשל לראות על שילוט? אם התשובה היא לא, עדיף לא להמציא תרגום. המשתמשים לא ימצאו אותו בשטח. במקרה כזה ניתן להשאיר את האנגלית ריק או לחלופין לעשות Transliteration לדוגמת "Rasan Ido"

הנחיות השמות המלאות ניתן למצוא כאן:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Israel#Naming
idith (2026-01-04 07:47:47+00:00): yes this is the translation on the street sign
SafwatHalaby (2026-01-08 09:13:24+00:00): Thank you for the clarification!
Seyruun (2025-12-28 14:33:56+00:00): Computer lag strikes again! Thanks for fixing it. :)
somehundred (2025-12-28 11:17:42+00:00): Hello! You added a museum which did exist in past in this location but doesn't exist right now. It's currently located at another place. Please verify whether the object you want to add is actually located there. If unsure, then don't add.
aceman444 (2026-05-06 09:20:55+00:00): This looks good, thanks.
wa_wheatbelt (2026-02-15 11:00:36+00:00): Hi there. What’s your source for the no u-turn? Is there a new sign there?
wa_wheatbelt (2026-02-15 11:01:08+00:00): If not, a u-turn would be legal under WA law.
TheSwavu (2026-02-15 22:13:32+00:00): Hi

If you want to remove a turn restriction using iD you need to remove all of the members of the relation. Otherwise, what it looks like is that you have been editing in the area and iD has broken the relation https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/relation/18330716

It might be easier to use level0 or JOSM to remove a turn restriction.

Happy mapping.
wa_wheatbelt (2026-02-24 10:32:22+00:00): Ahh okay. Thanks for the explanation. It’s too easy to not notice an existing relation on iD.
aceman444 (2026-05-06 08:47:48+00:00): Hi, I doubt twisting the road in weird ways affects navigation (which one) in any way.
Anyway, it is clearly seen on Ortofotomozaika imagery that on the road https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/237508672 the left lane has s 'through' turn lane so I don't know why you changed it to 'none'. Just because some random navigation app gives improper commands does not mean you can damage data.

But all these roads and lanes in this area are ripe for a rework as they branch at wrong points.
aceman444 (2026-05-06 08:58:40+00:00): If it connects 2 tertiary roads, then it indeed may be a link. Now you created a fictional tertiary road without official number. Anyway, the roads in the south are tertiary just because someone changed them like that, they also aren't official. In that case this can be tertiary too.
aceman444 (2026-05-06 09:58:22+00:00): The change on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1160239565 seems OK, the angle could even be 90deg (perpendicular to the main road Kostiviarska.

But then change on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/33576380 does not make sense. Now when you go from this part of Jelsova to the northern part (across Kostiviarska), you want to get navigation guidance of turn left, then turn right? Even though you can just drive straight?
What routing could have been wrong here? Notice routing is different to turn-by-turn navigation guidance.
Or did you not get 'turn left' prompts when going from Kostiviarska to Jelsova? That would be a navigation bug, not to be solved by change in the map.

On the other hand, if you draw the centerline of the Jelsova street, then the geometry after your change is correct. I just dispute explaining the changes by navigation.
Antonio Eugenio Burriel (2026-02-22 20:08:38+00:00): Hello,

I would like to confirm if you did a physical survey on 2025-12-28 of this area or you relied on aerial imagery instead.

I'm asking because recent aerial imagery of 2025-05-25 shows the construction works of this roundabout and related ways as completed and opened to traffic.
Britzz (2026-02-23 22:23:55+00:00): it was a physical survey but i used only street complete so maybe i didn't even try to correct the geometry, i don't remember if the roundabout was open to traffic or not
silversurfer83 (2025-12-28 14:04:24+00:00): Bestens. Danke :)

Bei Fragen immer raus damit
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176518908
NeisBot (2025-12-28 16:35:54+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 7 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/59049967 v5 | 4 crossings
https://osm.org/way/59049970 v3 | 3 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=176519211
NeisReview (2026-01-07 17:34:06+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/176626217
Baloo Uriza (2025-12-29 21:53:17+00:00): Streetnames for sidewalks are very helpful for pedestrian directions.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176519302
NeisBot (2025-12-28 16:41:00+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13412949813 v1

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Website ontwikkelaar"
---
Bijvoorbeeld, een meer neutrale en feitelijke versie van je beschrijving kon zijn: "Website ontwikkelaar"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description
Christophe ESKIDOOS (2025-12-29 08:56:37+00:00): website ontwikkelaar is prima
NeisReview (2025-12-29 09:49:54+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176541560
NeisBot (2025-12-28 16:41:03+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13412951773 v1

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Hondenvoeding winkel"
---
Bijvoorbeeld, een meer neutrale en feitelijke versie van je beschrijving kon zijn: "Hondenvoeding winkel"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description
NeisReview (2025-12-29 09:49:59+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176541560
NeisBot (2025-12-28 16:41:07+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13412911795 v1

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Online hondenamen tool"
---
Bijvoorbeeld, een meer neutrale en feitelijke versie van je beschrijving zou kunnen zijn: "Online hondenamen tool"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description
NeisReview (2025-12-29 09:49:43+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176541560
NeisBot (2025-12-28 16:41:11+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13412943834 v1

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Hondentrainers"
---
Bijvoorbeeld, een meer neutrale en feitelijke versie van je beschrijving kon zijn: "hondentrainers"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description
NeisReview (2025-12-29 09:49:49+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176541560
Rainero (2026-03-30 18:44:12+00:00): Revert changeset/180641543
wegen nicht zulässiger Quelle (Bayernatlas).
martinst (2026-07-15 17:13:10+00:00): surface=fine_gravel passt nicht zu tracktype=grade1. 
Korrigiert zu grade2 in Changeset: 185797307
Wulf4096 (2026-04-24 08:20:59+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5260636
trigpoint (2026-07-04 12:55:37+00:00): Hello
No what is the purpose of name:en which you have not mentioned in the changeset comment?
No native English speaker ever tanslates the name of the Paris stations therefore the tags you have added are only likely to confuse end users.
For example Eurostar trains go to Paris Nord, you never see the word North on the departure boards at St Pancras.

Cheers Phil
eggie (2025-12-28 12:25:39+00:00): Dag Enigma,

In OSM hoef je geen adressen aan te maken. Maak gebruik van de al bestaande adresnode. Die selecteer je dan dan kiezen voor alle tags zichtbaar en via aanvullen kun de dan de info toevoegen.
Ik heb de info samengevoegd. 
Er zit ook nog een foutje in de openingstijden. 1700 ontbreekt dubbele punt. Ik heb het hersteld.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=176524528
Mapse,
eggie
EnigmA-X (2025-12-28 12:49:23+00:00): Dank voor de aanwijzing, ik was na jouw vorige correctie al aan het twijfelen. Zal erop letten!
yelisey90 (2025-12-28 15:05:05+00:00): I think it's better to split https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1061621209 in two parts: one north of the fence, needleleaved; and another south of the fence, broadleaved (or mixed).
Also, I recommend using imagery from maps.gov.ge, it's far more clear and precise. When editing in iD, open background settings to the right, click the three dots next to "Custom" and enter https://nt0.napr.gov.ge/NGCache?x={x}&y={y}&z={z}&l=ORTHO_GEORGIA_4
yelisey90 (2025-12-28 15:06:45+00:00): hhhm, the link above was corrupted. Enter https://nt0.napr.gov.ge/NGCache?x= {x}&y= {y}&z= {z}&l= ORTHO_GEORGIA_4 but without the spaces after = symbols
Jk488 (2025-12-28 15:49:51+00:00): Thank you!