piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Metzor (2024-05-30 19:47:28+00:00): Hi jfb95,

Thanks for contributing!

There seems to be several issues:

1.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11944974770#map=9/48.9856/2.2522
- wrong phone number
- opening hours on sunday?!?
- website is for the county, not the county council...

2. Changeset size - please don't change Pois in France and est Asia at the same timea
One general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: 

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

 Why? Have a look at the section 
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

Ps: Anwwering comments is considered to be polite ;-)
mikimapbuilder (2024-05-30 12:59:39+00:00): Changed road type based on imagery.
aixbrick (2024-05-30 14:08:16+00:00): Hallo,
ich hatte bewusst auf das Präfix "post_office:" verzichtet, weil ich annahm, dass das nur genutzt wird, wenn es sich um eine Postfiliale im Einzelhandel handelt (Haupttag ist also z.B. "shop"), um deutlich zu machen worauf sich "service_provider" bezieht. Bei reinen Postfilialen hielt ich das für unnötig.
Möglicherweise kommt das Missverständnis aber auch aus der Tabelle in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:post_office/postal_service_provider.
Gruß
mueschel (2024-05-30 14:22:24+00:00): Hi,
es hat mich auch gewundert, aber "service_provider" wird tatsächlich bisher nirgends verwendet. post_office:service_provider zusammen mit amenity=post_office hingegen schon 140 Mal. 

Deswegen auch die Änderung - ansonsten bin ich aber auch eher der Meinung das Präfixe zu verzichten.
qmi0 (2024-07-20 06:40:06+00:00): Hello, this parking is not for the public but only for ZTL-registered people.
kucai (2024-05-31 03:09:17+00:00): This is a service road, not a residential.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152034604
VormaCanal (2024-06-03 12:35:27+00:00): Hello kucai, thanks for reaching out! After re-evaluating the area, I agree that the https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/640909176 is narrow compared to the main residential roads and retaining it as a service would be accurate. I have made that change. Have a nice day!
cyril42e (2024-06-07 22:59:44+00:00): Bonjour, merci pour votre contribution très complète sur ce POI. Je me permets tout de même de proposer quelques suggestions d'amélioration :
- Les chaines de magasin disposent d'un identifiant particulier qu'il convient d'utiliser, par exemple l'éditeur iD le propose lorsqu'on cherche le nom de la chaîne de magasin. Par exemple dans ce cas il faut ajouter les tags: "brand=LDLC"
et "brand:wikidata=Q3117461"
- une recherche rapide de noeud existant permet d'éviter les duplicats, et peut vous aider à renseigner plus précisément la position du POI. Par exemple ici le magasin est situé dans le bâtiment d'à côté, et un POI avait déjà été créé. Cette recherche peut se faire visuellement, ou être automatisée avec une requête overpass-turbo en cherchant le nom du magasin par exemple.
- En cas de doute sur le positionnement exact du magasin, vous pourriez aussi ajouter une note pour demander aux contributeurs locaux de le positionner plus précisément.
Je vais réaliser la fusion des POIs.
Cordialement
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2024-06-10 13:56:32+00:00): Bonjour,

Nous faisons toujours une recherche manuelle via Nominatim afin de ne pas créer des doublons. Ce qui est bizarre, c'est que rien n'en est ressorti en Novembre.
Pour L'ID de la marque, nous essayons au maximum de l'ajouter manuellement au fur et à mesure

Cordialement,
L'Equipe DB
N9713 (2024-08-18 21:27:04+00:00): Hallo wermak, kannst du erklären, warum du die Fuß/Radwege entlang des Lutterdamms und der Schleptruper Straße gelöscht hast? Dort war nichts "doppelt" eingetragen, die Fuß- und Radwege hatten lediglich eigene Pfade und an der Straße war das tag cycleway=separate gesetzt, um auf diese hinzuweisen. So wie jetzt kann es nicht bleiben, da jetzt gar keine Radwege mehr vorhanden sind: Von der Straße wird man durch cycleway=separate auf die separaten Pfade geschickt, die jetzt aber nicht mehr existieren. Falls deine Bearbeitung ein Versehen war, würde ich versuchen, die Pfade wiederherzustellen. Grüße, N9713
d3mol3k (2025-07-23 16:40:28+00:00):  tego co się orientuję nie stosujemy przy highway=pedestian dodatkowego tagowania area=yes - jest to mapowanie pod render; powinno być dla lini tylko tag area:highway=pedestrian tak dla Twojego tworu - bulwar Gdyński jak i placu WOŚP prosiłbym o zmianę i poprawienie.Pozdrawiam
dankarran (2024-05-30 15:25:03+00:00): Not sure where that 80mph limit came from. I'll update the rest of the road, as the conditional one way system and bicycle ban need updating as well.

It looks like during TT period there are some temporary limits to take into account:
https://www.gov.im/media/1383902/public-notice-of-tt-road-races-authorisation-2024.pdf
NeisBot (2024-05-30 13:36:24+00:00): Hi Riveria, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1288045804

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
Riveria (2024-05-30 14:08:19+00:00): hi, please check the satellite map instead of normal map
43.818412, 125.328428
https://maps.app.goo.gl/dnsT3Nhwi3H1WM9C8
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-30 15:36:53+00:00): Thanks for your answer.

We don't use Google Maps for our mapping.
bxl-forever (2024-05-30 14:25:36+00:00): Hello,

If Evergreen is the name of the residence, then the name must be added to the building and not by removing valid tags on an existing node for one business operating here.

I restored proper tags, here is the building: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/75237927

Have a nice day.
PcMouse1 (2024-06-03 21:14:01+00:00): Ou as tu trouve cette imagerie?  J'aimerais l'utiliser sur JOSM.
une abeille (2024-06-03 23:54:10+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy m'a le montré
eggie (2024-05-30 13:53:35+00:00): Hi You are sure there is no address anymore here?

Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2024-05-30 13:55:03+00:00): Please don't delete addressnodes. Just remove the shopinfo. I restored the addressnode.
gr eggie
map per (2024-05-30 19:35:36+00:00): Wegen review_requested:
Die Änderung sieht gut aus, danke!
Discostu36 (2024-05-31 20:45:00+00:00): Ich habe service=driveway entfernt, das sind ja keine Grundstückseinfahrten
NeisBot (2024-05-30 14:18:24+00:00): Hi tanyeee, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1288056947

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-30 15:40:08+00:00): Hi tanyeee, welcome to OSM.

May we know the source of your mapping activities?

Thanks.
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-31 06:02:33+00:00): Thanks for your answer here:
https://osm.org/changeset/152033624

#HappyMapping
Frans S (2024-06-08 08:24:59+00:00): Here you did not tag the buildings as well.
Tags building=yes, added by another mapper.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152038293
Henny Vianelde (2024-05-30 14:24:00+00:00): Great Job, Keep Mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152038318
Henny Vianelde (2024-05-30 14:40:52+00:00): Great Job, Keep Mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152038481
Henny Vianelde (2024-05-30 14:40:01+00:00): Great Job, Keep Mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152038484
BladeTC (2024-06-09 18:01:44+00:00): Thanks, doing my best!
Henny Vianelde (2024-05-30 14:39:35+00:00): Great Job, Keep Mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152038485
Grannymeg (2024-09-12 08:35:19+00:00): Thank you for your positive feedback.
Henny Vianelde (2024-05-30 14:39:06+00:00): Great Job, Keep Mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152038489
Bratananio (2024-05-30 19:46:07+00:00): Thanks for the compliment. I'll try to do mapping in furure as good as I can.
Best regards
B.
Henny Vianelde (2024-05-30 14:38:33+00:00): Great Job, Keep Mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152038492
Henny Vianelde (2024-05-30 14:37:46+00:00): Great Job, Keep Mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152038495
Henny Vianelde (2024-05-30 14:37:11+00:00): Great Job, Keep Mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152038499
Henny Vianelde (2024-05-30 14:35:59+00:00): Great Job, Keep Mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152038501
eggie (2024-05-30 18:01:53+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-05-30 18:05:07+00:00): Feedback   De straatnamen heb ik gecorrigeerd naar Meester Simon Buijsstraat.
(met hoofdletters)
eggie (2024-05-30 18:06:48+00:00): Mocht je nog eens zin en tijd hebben dan zou je die niet doodlopende straten kunnen omtaggen naar highway=residential ipv unclassified.
Mapse
eggie
silversurfer83 (2024-06-01 05:05:25+00:00): Hallo roadrunner :)

kleiner Hinweis: Auch wenn die (sehr vielseitige und leistungsstarke) App OsmAnd bei Erstellung eines POI praktisch immer das Feld "Name" anbietet, ist es trotzdem unüblich rein deskriptive Namen wie "Picknicktisch" anzugeben. Dass hier ein Picknicktsich steht ergibt sich aus den Eigenschaften des Punkts, welche da lauten "leisure=picknick_table".
Details dazu liefert auch
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen

Ich werde den Namen erstmal wieder entfernen, sofern von dir keine Einwände kommen.

Weiter viel Spaß an der Karte und bei Fragen immer raus damit
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152038814
Henny Vianelde (2024-05-30 14:42:00+00:00): Great Job, Keep Mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152039199
Henny Vianelde (2024-05-30 14:41:40+00:00): Great Job, Keep Mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152039205
Henny Vianelde (2024-05-30 14:41:17+00:00): Great Job, Keep Mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152039207
mike140 (2025-12-06 18:57:37+00:00): building на территории школы не нужен: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1288064699
mike140 (2025-12-06 19:03:16+00:00): И здесь тоже: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1288064720
Henny Vianelde (2024-05-30 14:47:07+00:00): Great Job, Keep Mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152039301
Henny Vianelde (2024-05-30 14:43:51+00:00): Great Job, Keep Mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152039304
Henny Vianelde (2024-05-30 14:43:17+00:00): Great Job, Keep Mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152039316
Henny Vianelde (2024-05-30 14:42:49+00:00): Great Job, Keep Mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152039318
Syl (2024-06-22 19:44:32+00:00): Bonjour, il y a toujours un téléphone qui fonctionne dans la cabine ?
Sinon il y a l'attribut man_made=telephone_box (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dtelephone_box)
Ewrt1 (2024-05-30 14:50:45+00:00): *Many Hearthstone updates
IBT3032 (2024-06-01 16:39:54+00:00): Great, thanks for adding!
limes11 (2024-05-30 15:12:53+00:00): Ok danke

Ja, wenn ich da nicht gleich auf die Mail antworte, vergesse ich es mit Sicherheit. Daher ist das immer etwas tricky mit dem Schließen vor Upload.

Viele Grüße
Langlaeufer (2024-05-31 13:25:41+00:00): gibt es da irgendein Schild, was die Benutzung des Weges verbietet? "Privatweg" alleine reicht nicht. Ansonsten kommt alles access weg.
Frans S (2024-05-31 07:48:26+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 

Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Inaccurate mapped. Follow the rooflines more precise.
Don't cluster buildings.

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152040973
woodpeck_repair (2024-05-30 15:16:49+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 149803745, 149803884, 149803978, 149804573, 149804920, 149805155, 149806253, 149806651, 149807234, 149807679, 149808031, 149808075, 149808857, 149809158, 149809211, 149810200, 149810778, 149811146, 149811489, 149812209, 149812454, 149813104, 149813553, 149814382, 149814593, 149814709, 149814738, 149815179, 149817574, 149817989, 149818867, 149819639, 149819709, 149829309, 149829659, 149829831, 149830832, 149831761, 149832159, 149832315, 149832999, 149843078, 149843108, 149843148, 149843357, 149843414, 149843579, 149843663, 149843761, 149843849, 149843970, 149844031, 149844073, 149844406, 149844455, 149844466, 149844738, 149844763, 149844977, 149845080, 149845255, 149845371, 149845584, 149845787, 149846006, 149846214, 149846313, 149846403, 149846683, 149846911, 149847150, 149847200, 149847333, 149847626, 149849799, 149849965, 149852069, 149852796, 149853557, 149854389, 149854667, 149855264, 149855857, 149856191, 149857995, 149858838, 149860207, 149860880, 149861537, 149862209, 149862409, 149865836, 149866398, 149867383, 149867690, 149867855, 149868323, 149868373, 149868470, 149873099.
woodpeck_repair (2024-05-30 15:16:48+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 149803745, 149803884, 149803978, 149804573, 149804920, 149805155, 149806253, 149806651, 149807234, 149807679, 149808031, 149808075, 149808857, 149809158, 149809211, 149810200, 149810778, 149811146, 149811489, 149812209, 149812454, 149813104, 149813553, 149814382, 149814593, 149814709, 149814738, 149815179, 149817574, 149817989, 149818867, 149819639, 149819709, 149829309, 149829659, 149829831, 149830832, 149831761, 149832159, 149832315, 149832999, 149843078, 149843108, 149843148, 149843357, 149843414, 149843579, 149843663, 149843761, 149843849, 149843970, 149844031, 149844073, 149844406, 149844455, 149844466, 149844738, 149844763, 149844977, 149845080, 149845255, 149845371, 149845584, 149845787, 149846006, 149846214, 149846313, 149846403, 149846683, 149846911, 149847150, 149847200, 149847333, 149847626, 149849799, 149849965, 149852069, 149852796, 149853557, 149854389, 149854667, 149855264, 149855857, 149856191, 149857995, 149858838, 149860207, 149860880, 149861537, 149862209, 149862409, 149865836, 149866398, 149867383, 149867690, 149867855, 149868323, 149868373, 149868470, 149873099.
A Hall (2024-09-22 17:55:52+00:00): FYI, I'm not entirely sure what sources you were using to 'ground-truth', but your changeset largely added in paths that had been removed. So the data you added is at odds with what is actually on the ground. I'd suggest comparing a couple different aerial images and identifying conflicts before you assume one imagery is the actual. I'm going to clean this up as I live close by and I can ground survey anything that is questionable.
thechad81578 (2024-09-23 10:50:09+00:00): Alex, bummer, my edits were based on information from a friend who visited the campus in combination with GPS heatmaps that shows people still using the "paths". I'll recheck his messages and see whether he or I misinterpreted what was on the ground. Thanks for the message and the cleanup effort.
Frans S (2024-05-31 07:43:00+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 

Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Inaccurate mapped.
Buildings oversized.
Included shadow of the building.
Quality prevails above quantity !!

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152041209
eggie (2024-05-30 18:10:04+00:00): Dag 78,

Dat heb je correct gedaan want de wandelroutes zijn nog intact.

MVG
eggie
fititnt (2024-07-17 22:36:07+00:00): Hi @MapperManuel

Why did you deleted https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1205128963/history ?

This seems to damaged two administrative boundaries (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16284185/history and https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16284184)
fititnt (2024-08-05 14:24:54+00:00): @MapperManuel the two administrative boundaries still broken.
jogemu (2025-01-29 14:17:01+00:00): Etxebarri kalea: highway=residential -> highway:footway
Inaccessible oneways left after changeset. Maybe you intended to change only the northernmost part.
miluethi (2024-05-30 15:41:44+00:00): Rebecca,
this building shape and a few others are far bigger than the the satellite imagery. I'm going to delete them.

I'm a little surprised that such an experienced mapper like you is adding such crappy additions.

Please stop or provide better contributions to OSM Nicaragua.

Thank you.
adrienandrem (2024-05-31 19:12:19+00:00): Bonsoir,

merci de suivre autant que possible les bonnes pratiques en ce qui concerne les commentaires de modifications [1][2].
"Améliorations à ..." est vide de sens.

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#Faites_de_bons_commentaires_de_groupe_de_modifications
[2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Cordialement
DD1GJ (2024-05-31 08:45:11+00:00): Hallo bolocalguide,
Der erwähnte § 27 gestattet eigentlich grundsätzlich das Betreten der freien Landschaft mit Einschränkung während der Nutzzeit bei landwirtschaftlichen Flächen. Der Weg ist auf den Luftbildern der Landesvermessung klar und deutlich erkennbar und entsprechend der Bodenbeschaffenheit und Tragfähigkeit bei OSM eingetragen. Ich habe Daher die Löschung rückgängig gemacht.
bolocalguide (2024-05-31 10:47:52+00:00): Hallo DD1GJ,

gegen das grundsätzliche Freie Betreten der Landschaft außerhalb der Nutzungszeiten ist nichts einzuwenden, zumal ich selbst dieses Recht nutze. Leider schließen viele Leute aus "Wegen" in Onlinekarten automatisch, daß Sie dort jederzeit langgehen können. Genaus oft sehe Radfahrer (auf gewidmeten) Wanderwegen in meiner Umgebung, die nicht nur die Rechtslage nicht kennen oder absichtlich ignorieren, sondern es Ihnen auch völlig egal ist, wenn ein Weg nicht dafür geeignet ist. Das eintragen von "Wegen" in Online Karten führt daher zu Problemen und zieht Leute an. Es gibt auch in unserer Umgebung ausreichend ausgeschilderte Wanderwege die zur Verfügung stehen. Ich selbst nutze zum Wandern MapsMe und bin oft genug in Gestrüpp oder einer Sackgasse gelandet wenn ich einen Online verzeichneten "Weg" versuche zu folgen. 

Nicht nur aus diesen Gründen habe ich kein Verständis, wenn hier einen "Weg" über meine Grundstücke eintragen wo keiner ist. Auch die Stadt Dohna hat bei einer Ortsbegehung dort keinen Weg feststellen können, schriftliche Protokolle davon liegen mir vor. Aus der Ferne anhand von momentanen Fahrspuren durch die Bewirtschaftung darauf zu schließen ob ein Weg existiert finde etwas anmaßend. Sie würden doch auch nicht eine Traktorspur auf einem Feld als Weg ansehen? Das Wegerecht ist etwas komplexer und sollten Mapper nicht völlig ignorieren. F

Ich bitte daher mein Rechte als Eigentümer zu respektieren. Das freie Betreten der Landschaft ist den Leuten auch möglich, ohne dass dort ein "Weg" eingezeichnet ist. Vielen Dank

Mit freundlichen Grüßen
miluethi (2024-06-01 01:22:24+00:00): Deleted all buildings. Shapes are far too big compared to satellite imagery..
Gregory Peony (2024-07-18 21:36:30+00:00): The features I flagged should definitely not have been deleted. Rather their geometry should be modified, like the objects in the geometry changes section of this change-set if you are modifing an existing feature. Only delete features if you have reason to believe that they either, never existed, or no longer exist. Modifying existing objects preserves their history and meta data e.g. in this change-set WAY: 332619184 was originally added back in 2015 but you deleted it, now the footprint you created represents the same feature but was only created in 2024. This meta data can be useful to those tracking how the map changes over time. Click the features in the change-set to see their history.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152042899
Gregory Peony (2024-07-18 21:43:27+00:00): I have changed the flags to the features that should not have been created from schratch but rather the overlapping features that were deleted should have been edited to represent that feature.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152042899
NeisBot (2024-05-30 16:06:24+00:00): Hi ChloéCF, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 44 building(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
NeisBot (2024-05-31 06:13:29+00:00): Hi Poggystyle, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1288088039

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck