piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Userinexile (2026-07-10 18:45:18+00:00): 是的，但是对于地铁站而言，前面的路属于“专名”，但若道路本身是要展开的
minusmajorityhh (2026-07-10 18:54:37+00:00): 英美和中国其他大城市的地铁站名都是使用完整的 Road Street 等词汇的
minusmajorityhh (2026-07-10 19:07:06+00:00): 包括杭州 上海 伦敦 纽约 香港 的地铁站名在osm上标注时都使用了全称，即使在当地地铁站实地站名中使用的可能是Rd. St. Ave. 这一类的缩写
qgmzmy (2026-07-10 20:24:45+00:00): 车站的通名通常是“站”（“Station”）。他地地铁站的命名方式不应作为命名宁波轨道交通车站的依据。查找了官方网站和网络上的照片，皆显示这些车站的英文名应以“Rd”结尾。
minusmajorityhh (2026-07-10 21:21:26+00:00): 那确实是我的理解有误
Userinexile (2026-07-24 16:46:13+00:00): 考虑到包括OSM，维基百科等等社群运作集体似乎共识是使用全称，在 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186306787 中回退
Grove11 (2026-07-10 16:31:26+00:00): Is it blocked because of the Aurs Road closure?
Access Claims (komoot) (2026-07-13 13:42:04+00:00): Received an on-site photo report showing this path intentionally blocked by a wooden barrier. The duration and reason are unknown, though it may be related to nearby road expansion works.
Grove11 (2026-07-13 13:48:18+00:00): I have marked the south end as closed - do you know where the barriers are? How close to the road closure?
trigpoint (2026-07-13 14:08:17+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/185655322
eggie (2026-07-10 09:53:25+00:00): Dag Marcel..  Dar zou goed kunnen, maar je hebt helaas ook het adres verwijderd. Ik zal het herstellen.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-07-10 09:56:10+00:00): Marcel.. Graag bijtaggen op de bestaande adresnode.
Ik he de info samengevoegd.
Gr eggie
eggie (2026-07-10 09:58:10+00:00): Zou het leisure=fitness wellicht zijn. Deze tag doet niets.
Insulation? Is dat de juiste tag? 
MVG
eggie
salgo60 (2026-07-10 09:49:21+00:00): @belak Jag är osäker på om detta är den bästa modelleringen. 

För SAT framstår detta som samma destination, men i OSM är det två olika objekt:

OSM node 4217053868 (harbour=yes) → ref:stockholmarchipelagotrail=sat:poi:krbvq
OSM way 1517327071 (leisure=marina) → ref:stockholmarchipelagotrail=sat:poi:3axkg

Borde verkligen SAT ha två olika POI:n här, eller vore det bättre med ett gemensamt SAT-POI som kopplas till båda OSM-objekten?

jag är långt ifrån proffs på hur OSM skall moduleras men känns fel med 2 objekt på SAT jag försöker hitta bra websidor som beskriver dom olika hamnarna där https://www.dockspot.com/sv/docks/1105  känns bäst men verkar bara ha medlemmar....
kubahahaha (2026-07-12 20:20:52+00:00): Dlaczego zmieniłeś bicycle=no → destination? Przecież tam jest znak B-9
Yog Sot (2026-07-13 12:57:53+00:00): takie jest prawo w polsce, a wyjasnienia są w poprzednim zestawie zmian. 
Ponadto nie jesteś z tąd, a wprowadzasz zmiany bez jakiejkolwiek wiedzy. 
Wycofuję, bo nie potrafiłes nawet zaczekać na odpowiedz. 
Najpierw duskusja, potem działania. Naucz się.
kubahahaha (2026-07-13 19:47:53+00:00): Jak ktoś chce poczytać, że "W polskim ustawodawstwie masz możliwość dojazdu do posesji przy drodze publicznej dowolnym pojazdem", to tutaj

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185405351
HirschKauz (2026-07-10 09:42:34+00:00): updated Changeset: 185463351
mor (2026-07-25 20:26:32+00:00): ¿Por qué vuelves a crear la misma administración de lotería que ya creaste hace un mes? ¿no ves que está repetida?
Dodko (2026-07-11 11:05:34+00:00): Opravené https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1219375525/history
NieWnen (2026-07-11 22:06:27+00:00): Cześć,
aktualnie tagowanie jest błędne. CPRy mapujemy za pomocą highway=path

Dodawanie surface=asphalt również wygląda podejrzanie, bo chodnik nie jest raczej asfaltowy, bo jest wciąż segregated=yes w tagach.

Zachęcam do zapoznania się z wiki:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Rowery#Drogi_dla_pieszych_i_rower%C3%B3w
Fizzie-DWG (2026-07-11 08:45:09+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20927
lyctkel (2026-07-12 16:27:41+00:00): Bedankt voor het controleren.
Dat was een kopieer- en plakfout van mijn kant. Ik ben toen vergeten het soort afval in te vullen.
SzymonH (2026-07-15 10:41:08+00:00): Z mojej wizyty (dziś, środa godz. 12) brak informacji o konieczności wnoszenia opłaty za parking.
Konrad SK (2026-07-18 07:48:32+00:00): Oznaczyłem jako bezpłatny, dziękuję za informację.
santon (2026-07-17 12:59:17+00:00): Hallo Toni, gibt es die Stattauto Station noch? Auf der Stattauto Seite ist diese Station nicht mehr auffindbar. Vielleicht steht aber auch nur noch der Tresor verwaist rum.
ToniE (2026-07-17 14:09:10+00:00): Wo soll der Tresor denn sein, in den OSM-Daten finden ich den in diesem Bereich nicht.
santon (2026-07-17 14:23:09+00:00): Die Station ist vor dem kleinen Gebäude südlich der Hochkalterstraße 14 eingezeichnet. Vemutlich ist das die TG-Ausfahrt. Soweit ich das sehe, hast du die 'Station' minimal verschoben, an den Daten ist nix geändert.
ToniE (2026-07-17 14:35:21+00:00): Yup, angefasst, verschoben, weil sie bis dahin laut Luftbild mitten auf der TG-Zufahrt gemapped war. In der Gudifdauer Straße waren wir nicht.
Wir waren am anderen Ende der emergency_access service road (die ich verbessert hatte) beim Parkplatz am Klausener Platz.
LordGarySugar (2026-07-14 00:46:05+00:00): Thanks for clarifying the access - I have changed it to access=destination as this is the correct tag for 'access only' roads. Many satnavs do not use OSM so it is unlikely that this will completely resolve the problem in general :)
Marek-M (2026-07-11 20:33:51+00:00): Czy na tych drogach są zakazy ruchu dla rowerzystów i koni?

Chodnik dla pieszych zwykle nie ma nawierzchni z błota.
wojte70 (2026-07-12 07:15:15+00:00): górna i słoneczna jest asfaltowa. ścieżki nad jeziorem nie nadają się do przejazdu, ą podmokłe i błotniste. często rowerzyści idą i noszą rowery co chwila pytając jak stąd wyjść.
Marek-M (2026-07-12 08:32:16+00:00): Formalnie jednak można tam rowerem wjechać, więc bicycle=no jest niepoprawne. Lepiej dodać tagi smoothness lub inne obniżające punkty w routingu rowerowym.
wojte70 (2026-07-12 10:54:32+00:00): Formalnie można
Marek-M (2026-07-13 08:08:09+00:00): Poprawiłem, część nawigacji pewnie i tak tam wpuści rowerzystów ale na to nie ma rady.
Marek-M (2026-07-13 18:40:07+00:00): Wg routingu na stronie OSM, to tylko ruch pieszy jest kierowany na tą ścieżkę przy jeziorze. Mam nadzieję, że to chciałeś osiągnąć swoimi edycjami.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_bicycle&route=54.23727%2C17.98348%3B54.25021%2C17.9908
silversurfer83 (2026-07-10 13:39:47+00:00): Moin Malte :)

access=private ist hier doch bestimmt korrekter, oder? Außerdem ist nun das westliche Ende der Kiefernstr. nicht routbar, obwohl sie nicht durch ein barrier=gate versperrt ist und doch sicher auch zum Parkplatz führt.

Vorschlag: Kiefernstr. am Tor aufteilen und den östl. Teil auf private setzen. Westl. Teil einfach wieder ohne jede Beschränkung, außer es gibt Schilder, die ich nicht kenne.

Bei Fragen immer raus damit

silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185466254
eggie (2026-07-10 12:29:33+00:00): Top!
alpacaMaps (2026-07-31 23:03:22+00:00): There are two nodes at this location. They seem identical except for one has a different direction. If you need to update direction, please edit the node that still exists. 

Thanks for helping keep OSM / DeFlock accurate!

-alpacaMaps
eggie (2026-07-10 12:22:40+00:00): Oke... Dan toch een beetje mierenneuken. 
Dat stuk bij het plantsoen is dan sidewalk=left
eggie (2026-07-10 12:23:52+00:00): Die wiki wordt doorlopend aangepast door janenalleman. Ik tag meestal sidewalk=both
Frans S (2026-07-11 10:08:07+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please map more accurately.
Your mappings are often oversized, not squared, and don't show the actual shape of buildings.
Quality prevails above quantity.
Best regards
eggie (2026-07-10 12:19:36+00:00): Thijs Je zegt zelf dat het niet voor regulier verkeer is? Nu zet je het met designated open voor regulier autoverkeer. Het was juist goed getagd met destination. 
Wat denk je dat designated betekent?

Ik daai de changeset terug, 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-07-10 12:21:03+00:00): reverted by changeset #185471178

Het is alleen voor bestemmingsverkeer.
Dus destination... geen designated (aangewezen voor)
Fraxi (2026-07-10 11:39:33+00:00): Вече е отбелязано:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/80526434/
trigpoint (2026-07-10 11:38:48+00:00): Please remember that openstreetmap is an opendata project where edits are backed up by on the ground evidence, not dubious web searches.
The source you have quoted here contains crown copyright maps which is an absolute no go area for openstreetmap, in fact the reason it exists in the first place.

Cheers Phil
trigpoint (2026-07-13 14:08:14+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/185655322
eggie (2026-07-10 12:26:16+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
DressyPear4 (2026-07-10 21:54:59+00:00): Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/185506114
eggie (2026-07-10 12:25:23+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
iuvi (2026-07-10 18:34:03+00:00): Можно вопрос? А почему статус дороги КОЛА меняется после када только? она же тянется прям до народной +-
Константин Гам (2026-07-11 11:18:09+00:00): Статус highway дорог в осм не связан напрямую с классификацией дорог в РФ. Просто запомнить и всё.

Как и писал где-то ранее, статусы дорог в СПб и рядом уже определены успешно, в изменении не нуждаются...
DebamitraDebnath (2026-07-10 11:53:37+00:00): tt_event
marcmarti (2026-07-10 12:46:22+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Looking at recent street view imagery, this street has two lanes, one in each direction. Are you sure you've tagged this correctly? The correct tag would be lanes=2
Andrea Tessieri (2026-07-10 14:15:17+00:00): Yes, sorry. Fixed.
Thanks a lot
Kamil Kalata (2026-07-10 12:14:30+00:00): Hello!
Why do you think sport=basketball;four_square is a silly tag? Not only does "sport" key documentation (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sport) allows separating values with a semicolon, but also sport=four_square is documented (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport=four_square). By the way, has this "cleanup" been discussed somewhere?
marcmarti (2026-07-10 12:28:35+00:00): I agree with Kamil, this changeset removes information for no good reason. Also, please do not make a changeset spanning the entire world, even if it's for a 'cleanup'. I think a revert would be fine
marcmarti (2026-07-10 12:30:55+00:00): Looking at this changeset further, it seems you've mapped the four square courts separately, so no need for a revert. Still, don't make changesets with large bounding boxes please.
Ethan Grobin (2026-07-10 12:51:31+00:00): Hello, sorry. I do not think it is a silly tag if the imagery is to poor for seperate mapping, and I did not just delete the tag, I replaced it with the relevant tag.

>  but also sport=four_square is documented (sport=four_square).

> By the way, has this "cleanup" been discussed somewhere?

The tag appears 20 times in osm, and I improved the data where possible and if not possible left the tag. A disscussion is not really needed

> Also, please do not make a changeset spanning the entire world 

There is nothing wrong with big bboxs and I am not spliting changesets into many tiny changesets.

I know, did you look at the changes at all? I added the courts seperatly.
Ethan Grobin (2026-07-10 12:55:45+00:00): Sorry the comment I just made had some format issues i will fix it.
Ethan Grobin (2026-07-10 12:56:50+00:00): Fixed Comment:

Hello, sorry. I do not think it is a silly tag if the imagery is to poor for separate mapping, and I did not just delete the tag, I replaced it with the relevant tags.

>  but also sport=four_square is documented (sport=four_square).

I know, did you look at the changes at all? I added the courts seperatly.

> By the way, has this "cleanup" been discussed somewhere?

The tag appears 20 times in osm, and I improved the data where possible and if not possible left the tag. A discussion is not really needed

> Also, please do not make a changeset spanning the entire world 

There is nothing wrong with big bboxs and I am not spliting changesets into many tiny changesets.
Kamil Kalata (2026-07-10 13:31:11+00:00): > I know, did you look at the changes at all? I added the courts seperatly.

Personally, I didn't look at the individual changes; I was going to do so later, but luckily marcmarti did the work. 

> I do not think it is a silly tag if the imagery is to poor for separate mapping, and I did not just delete the tag, I replaced it with the relevant tags.

OK, but your changeset comment wording was bad then. One could assume you'd mass-deleted the tag with no legitimate reason. You should have written "move four square pitches to separate objects" instead.

> The tag appears 20 times in osm, and I improved the data where possible and if not possible left the tag. A discussion is not really needed

Let me note that there exists "any tags you like" principle (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Any_tags_you_like). Although it is good to improve the mapping like you did, even without discussion, your changeset comment wording made your changes look suspicious and contrary to the principle.
marcmarti (2026-07-10 13:38:25+00:00): Hi ethan, there very much is a problem with large bounding boxes, as i edit locally and both your changesets are showing up as recent in my area. There is a wiki article explaning why large changesets are not recommended, please look it up.
Ethan Grobin (2026-07-10 13:42:43+00:00): > Personally, I didn't look at the individual changes; I was going to do so later, but luckily marcmarti did the work. 

If you haven't looked at 60 changes, wait til you do to leave a comment, or your comment is useless.

> OK, but your changeset comment wording was bad then.  ... You should have written "move four square pitches to separate objects" instead.

Fair

> One could assume you'd mass-deleted the tag with no legitimate reason

Not if they looked at the changes, which is needed before a comment

>Let me note that there exists "any tags you like" principle (osm.wiki/Any_tags_you_like). Although it is good to improve the mapping like you did, even without discussion, your changeset comment wording made your changes look suspicious and contrary to the principle.

I know about ATYL. It is unrelated.

You should make your changeset comments less condescending in future, you write as if you are an expert explaining to a beginner whilst not checking what you comment on and not (yet) being an experienced mapper.
MapmakerrrJohn (2026-07-10 14:58:49+00:00): Oh god another OSM drama.
pwbriggs (2026-07-11 09:28:43+00:00): Hi everyone! It seems that the confusion has been resolved here now. There were no mass edits involved in this changeset, but several features of the changeset made it seem like that was the case. Due to the multi-continent bounding box and (inadvertently) unclear changeset comment, several mappers—myself included—assumed that this changeset was an undiscussed mass edit. That's definitely an unfair assumption, made too quickly, and I think everyone would agree that we're sorry https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Ethan%20Grobin got the short end of the stick in this instance.

As for specific mapping practices, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets lays out the precedent for changeset bounding boxes: in short, there's a balancing point between too small and too large. That wiki page suggests a workflow in JOSM for splitting changes up if you realize that your data layer has edits that should be uploaded separately. Among other benefits, keeping bounding box sizes small where possible reduces the likelihood of a false positive from reviewers, like what happened above.

Have a good weekend, and happy mapping!
SD Mapman (2026-07-10 18:26:40+00:00): Hello! When you are editing these, can you move the values to ref instead of deleting them entirely? Then the local community can decide what to do with them.
squeaker_andrus (2026-07-14 16:01:21+00:00): Hi, SD Mapman!

Using the ref tag for these values isn't really suitable, as this tag requires a specific reference code or number (according to the OSM Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ref).

These names were removed because they aren't actual road names and literally indicate the absence of a sign. However, if this information is truly necessary for the local community, I can restore them in the description or note tag, depending on who this information is intended for (other OSM editors or map users).

Let me know what works best!

Have a nice day and happy mapping!
squeaker_andrus
SD Mapman (2026-07-14 19:00:14+00:00): Oh I see, I thought you were getting rid of the numbers. Carry on then. Should have looked at the way histories better first.
vasony (2026-07-11 16:49:14+00:00): Szia!

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12138777412

Ezen melyik U szám a jó?

Tamás
qstep (2026-07-11 18:18:07+00:00): A NAV ellenőrzője szerint a U45543865 megszűnt, a másiknak a címe pedig stimmel erre.
gwythyr622 (2026-07-13 10:40:08+00:00): Sziasztok,

Alapvetően én az láttam, ami az automatán szerepelt rajta. Köszönöm qstep az adatbázisból való megerősítést!
vasony (2026-07-13 12:33:33+00:00): 1 volt rajta (korábban adtad hozzá) egyet meg hozzáadtál frissen egy másik kulcsban, ezért volt a kérdés.
LouisXIV (2026-07-29 00:51:34+00:00): Why did you remove the alpine_coaster tag ?
LouisXIV (2026-07-29 01:02:53+00:00): Oh okay I see, it's not supposed to be on the track, sorry.
dzamper (2026-07-10 15:45:09+00:00): wg ortofoto to jest minirondo, jeśli nie było od tego czasu przebudowane to przed zmianami było zmapowane poprawnie
dzamper (2026-07-17 21:10:20+00:00): Wobec braku odpowiedzi wycofałem w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185928956
flohoff (2026-07-10 14:01:30+00:00): Hi,
is there a reason you removed the service=parking_aisle here? 

From aerials its pretty obvious a parking_aisle.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/578400004
eggie (2026-07-10 19:22:11+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
DressyPear4 (2026-07-10 21:56:26+00:00): Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/185506179
Joel Koen (2026-07-11 00:28:34+00:00): Hello, this changeset has been reverted in changeset/185510962. You've changed a service road into a footpath for no reason, and attached landuse to various ways. Please don't this.

I think you may have been trying to fix some kind of routing issue with the sidewalk? I have properly linked the sidewalk to the road in another changeset.

Also, please don't mention "official website" in your changesets without including a link / some way of knowing what website you were on. It it look like you're making stuff up.
Joel Koen (2026-07-11 00:29:02+00:00): *It looks like
RandomThighsEnjoyer (2026-07-10 15:18:08+00:00): Siehe Hinweis: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5382678
pitscheplatsch (2026-07-10 13:07:44+00:00): Revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185440364
pitscheplatsch (2026-07-10 13:35:04+00:00): Hi @Libya-truth, I suggest referring to the mentioned block more carefully.

The published reason for the block only states that the account was blocked "for further investigation into apparent improper deletions." It does not publicly confirm that the block concerned the same behaviour or these specific name=* deletions.

Treating the block as a confirmed precedent may unnecessarily escalate the discussion. More generally, repeatedly including usernames and references to blocks in changeset comments can shift the focus away from the actual data and make constructive discussion more difficult.

Best regards, Pascal
Libya-truth (2026-07-10 14:03:10+00:00): Hi Pascal,

Fair point, and accepted. You're right — the published block reason only mentions an investigation, and I phrased it as more than that. I'll stop referencing users, blocks, or reports in changeset comments going forward and keep them focused on the data: what was changed, what was restored, and the sources.

For transparency, this changeset restored tags to their pre-dispute state, including one case where a town's name tag had been deleted entirely (node/1565511513). I have no further edits planned to the disputed tags, and I remain ready to discuss the sources, the language codes (I've said before that name:ber may not be the ideal code and I'm open to migrating to more specific ones), and the name=* format in one central place — a forum thread in the Libya category would work for me.

Thanks for keeping this constructive.

Best regards
george1201 (2026-07-10 14:06:36+00:00): Hallo ViciBiggi,
du hast einen neuen Knoten für Go Asia erstellt. Hier gibt es aber schon n2455428477 für einen leerstehenden Laden (ehemals Deichmann).  Der neue Supermarkt ist hier eingezogen. Kannst du bitte die Daten aus deinem neu erstellten Knoten in diesen vorhandenen Knoten überführen und  n14002533614 dann wieder löschen?
Weißt du vielleicht, was der Stand bei n6841077335 ist? Dort ist auch Go Asia eingetragen. Sind die umgezogen oder haben sie jetzt zwei Läden, was wegen der räumlichen Nähe eher unwahrscheinlich ist.
ViciBiggi (2026-07-10 14:13:06+00:00): Hallo George,
ups, alles klar, ich werde probieren, die Daten zu überführen.

Trotz der Nähe gibt es jetzt tatsächlich zwei aktive Filialen von Go Asia. Das habe ich mit eigenen Augen bezeugt. Laut Gesprächen mit Mitarbeitenden soll das auch so bleiben. Das Geschäft läuft wohl einfach gut 🤷.

Liebe Grüße
Vici
ViciBiggi (2026-07-10 14:38:42+00:00): Erledigt :)
george1201 (2026-07-10 14:42:05+00:00): Danke.
Antonino_Faro (2026-07-10 14:36:33+00:00): Ciao.
Occhio al commento del changeset, in quanto è presente un link alla notizia sbagliata.
Quella corretta credo che sia quella che hai inserito nelle way:
https://www.sciclivideonotizie.it/2026/07/09/rotatoria-a-bruca-automobilisti-e-residenti-lavori-andavano-eseguiti-prima-dellestate/
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185474293
qstep (2026-07-10 15:10:39+00:00): Sikerült átnevezned a Dózsa György utcát is Berze Nagy J. utcára. Egyébként mi van az utcanévtáblán kiírva pontosan?
qstep (2026-07-12 19:49:57+00:00): A kőkereszt tökéletesen leírható a material=stone címkével, nem kell neki név.
mga_geo (2026-07-12 11:46:46+00:00): Bonjour,
Je viens de voir votre ajout de deux ronds-points Cela a cassé la continuité du trajet de ligne de car BreizhGo 514.
Je n'arrive pas à corriger avec JOSM car il existe d'autres erreurs: chemin superposé, absence d'attribut junction=roundabout ...
Pouvez-vous corriger ?
Marc
lyonel35 (2026-07-12 15:15:02+00:00): 

Bonjour,

est ce mieux ainsi ?
mga_geo (2026-07-12 17:20:39+00:00): Oui !
J'ai pu corriger les deux relations route=bus.
J'ai ajouté l'attribut junction=roundabout sur la way des ronds-points  et je l'ai retiré d'un node.
JOSM signale des incohérences sur les associatedStreet mais je suis totalement incompétent sur le sujet.
Il est possible de demande de l'aide sur forum.openstreetmap.org.
lyonel35 (2026-07-13 07:23:12+00:00): Oui j'ignore quoi mettre en associate street du coup j'ai mis les 2rues

Peut etre ca le souci jvais en retirer une
pitscheplatsch (2026-07-10 13:35:42+00:00): Revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185440975
pitscheplatsch (2026-07-10 13:36:20+00:00): Again, please see my comment @ https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185473901#c1623939
qstep (2026-07-10 15:08:01+00:00): Ez egészen biztos, hogy holtág? Nem úgy néz ki.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-07-10 20:26:34+00:00): zmiany kategorii istotnych dróg muszą być przedyskutowane wcześniej na https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/pl/40
trigpoint (2026-07-10 13:55:18+00:00): Hello
Findmystreet uses copyrighted OS data and as such cannot be used a source when contributing to OSM.

Cheers Phil
trigpoint (2026-07-11 15:45:43+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/185544336