piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2023-03-30 15:37:31+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
Inaccurate mapped .
buildings not squared.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132911046
opendcc (2023-02-23 07:34:50+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen auf OpenStreetMap! Danke für Deine Beiträge.

Darf ich einen kleinen Fehlerhinweis anbringen: hier wurde die Adresse doppelt eingetragen - einmal auf dem Abbild des Gebäudes, einmal als einzelner Punkt. Es sollte nur eine Adresse eingetragen werden. Ebenso ist der 'name' wirklich nur der Eigenname (wie z.B. Hofbräuhaus), nicht die Adresse. Ich habe die entsprechende Korrekturen bereits vorgenommen. Weiterhin viel Spaß und Erfolg beim Mappen.

Servus Wolfgang
mavl (2023-04-23 15:49:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:01:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
euroPathfinder (2025-03-03 20:16:21+00:00): Guten Tag,

Ich hätte eine Frage zum Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30409210

Von Ihnen wurde eingetragen, dass dieser verwildert und nicht mehr zu verwenden sei. Allerdings gibt es Hinweise, dass dieser Weg immer noch beschildert und erkennbar ist. Ist dieser Weg also doch noch begehbar?

Beste Grüße
Nationalparkverwaltung Eifel (2025-03-04 08:21:55+00:00): Hallo euroPathfinder,
ich verstehe die Verwirrung, die bei genau diesem Wegabschnitt aufkommt. Der Weg war mal offizieller Bestandteil des Wegenetzes im Nationalpark Eifel, ist aber seit Jahren gesperrt und das bleibt voraussichtlich auf unbestimmt Zeit noch so. Der Weg wird also nicht mehr gepflegt, wächst immer weiter zu und dort findet auch keine Verkehrssicherung mehr statt. Das heißt, die Nutzung ist nicht nur verboten sondern auch gefährlich. Also nein, der Weg ist seit Jahren nicht mehr begehbar. Manche verstoßen gegen die temporäre Sperrung und erhalten damit einen gewissen Pfadcharakter - aber aus meiner Sicht wäre es falsch, den Weg deswegen wieder mit einem highway=path zu verstehen. Ist das nachvollziehbar oder gibt es in solchen Fällen andere, bessere Vorgehensweisen?

Viele Grüße aus der Nationalparkverwaltung Eifel :)
Nationalparkverwaltung Eifel (2025-03-04 08:26:37+00:00): Ergänzung: Andere Pfade wurden in diesem Bereich zum Ausgleich temporär freigegeben. Für Anwohnende und Gäste gibt es also gleichwertige Ausweichmöglichkeiten und diese sind mit highway=path und  ohne access=no getaggt.
mavl (2023-04-23 15:57:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
PT-53 (2023-02-23 08:52:23+00:00): Hallo Berghütte,
bitte schau Dir die Öffnungszeiten nochmal an. Auf der Homepage steht:
Öffnungszeiten:
Mi.- Sa.:     17.00 - 24.00 Uhr
Sonntag     11.00 - 22.00 Uhr
Küche macht am Sonntag von 14.00 - 17.00 Uhr Pause!
Grüße

PS: 
Für Fragen oder Anmerkungen bitte den Änderungssatz aufrufen und unterhalb Diskussion in das leere Feld eintragen.
Berghütte (2023-02-23 11:14:13+00:00): Hallo PT-53,
du hast Recht, meine Änderung bezog sich in erster Instanz da drauf, dass die Wirtschaft Montags & Dienstags geschlossen ist. Die Uhrzeiten schienen mir erst unauffällig, weil die eher den Zeiten der Küche entpsrechen. Ich passe es noch der Website entsprechend an.
Grüße
PT-53 (2023-02-23 13:23:50+00:00): Hallo Berghütte, 
Danke für die Rückmeldung und noch ein
Willkommen bei OSM.
Grüße aus dem westl. Landkreis BC
mavl (2023-04-23 15:50:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:57:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
julcnx (2023-02-24 03:30:31+00:00): thanks for the addition :) if you know the road is passable by standard city cars, routers will find it useful to have a smoothness tag (intermediate or bad).
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132911359
mavl (2023-04-23 15:53:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:02:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
opendcc (2023-02-23 07:36:53+00:00): Bitte dann auch diesen Knoten wieder löschen.

Ein Hinweis zur Sichtbarkeit: in der Datenbank ist die Änderung bereits drin, in den Graphiken fürs web wird das dann nach und nach eingerechnet. Es dauert also ein bischen, bis Deine Änderung auch sichtbar ist.
mavl (2023-04-23 16:06:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:55:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:57:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:10:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:53:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:49:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
user_18305684 (2023-02-24 13:05:32+00:00): Hi,

Why do you have changed a boundary into a waterway (r1453542) ? Do you know the differences ? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:waterway
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:boundary

I restored it.

Best regards
Aleksandar1994 (2023-02-27 07:41:04+00:00): Hi Krako73,
Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I apologize for the mistake I made in uploading the boundary as a waterway. I understand the differences between these two, and I appreciate you restoring it to its correct classification.
Thank you again for your help and understanding.
Best regards,
Aleksandar
mavl (2023-04-23 15:55:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:58:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:02:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:05:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
adrianojbr (2023-04-05 19:28:16+00:00): Olá!

Lembro que o alinhamento de vias deve ser feito com base em traços de GPS, conforme: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Using_aerial_imagery#Frequent_mistakes.

E ao alterar a geometria de vias evite deixá-las tortas, criando curvas inexistentes.

Além disso, é importante alinhar os elementos em volta a fim de manter o alinhamento relativo entre eles.

Abraço!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132911929
HiwasseeRiver (2023-04-06 09:12:44+00:00): Hello adrianojbr, The user LakeBaikal is no longer part of our team. I will handle this communication on their behalf.
The former version had a more simplified modeling around https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1957289466. I can update to better match the previous version of the data here to avoid creating non-existent curves that you mentioned. The existing road network that surrounds this parking lot (well aligned to Strava GPS) is close to both Bing Aerial Imagery and Maxar Premium Imagery. Does the local community have a preference between those two imagery sets? Thank you for the wiki guidelines for alignment & your input on imagery selection here. Best.

tradução automática:

Olá adrianojbr, O usuário LakeBaikal não faz mais parte da nossa equipe. Vou lidar com esta comunicação em seu nome.
A versão anterior tinha uma modelagem mais simplificada em torno de https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1957289466. Posso atualizar para melhor corresponder à versão anterior dos dados aqui para evitar a criação de curvas inexistentes que você mencionou. A rede rodoviária existente que circunda este estacionamento (bem alinhada com o Strava GPS) fica próxima ao Bing Aerial Imagery e ao Maxar Premium Imagery. A comunidade local tem preferência entre esses dois conjuntos de imagens? Obrigado pelas diretrizes do wiki para alinhamento e sua entrada na seleção de imagens aqui. Melhor.
adrianojbr (2023-04-07 00:40:26+00:00): Olá!

Eu não mapeio muito no oeste, apenas tento corrigir erros e manter coerência dos dados.

Minha área de maior atuação é no litoral. Pelo menos nessa região as imagens da Maxar estão mais atualizadas.

Se houver dúvidas na região do oeste, sugiro falar com o mapeador xtd que é mais ativo nessa região.

Abraço!
HiwasseeRiver (2023-04-10 05:10:16+00:00): Thank you for your assistance here and have a good day. 
tradução automática:
Obrigado por sua ajuda aqui e tenha um bom dia.
mavl (2023-04-23 16:06:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:12:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:05:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:04:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
gscscnd (2023-02-23 08:12:47+00:00): name="w budowie" jest całkowicie zbędne na obszarach landuse=construction.
mavl (2023-04-23 15:56:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:07:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:57:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:02:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:49:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:52:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:55:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:03:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:03:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:54:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:57:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:05:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:56:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-23 08:20:22+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10687672935

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
mavl (2023-04-23 15:53:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:11:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:06:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:09:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:48:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:10:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:59:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:58:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:50:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:49:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:02:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:58:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:05:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:59:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:03:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:06:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
jmarchon (2023-02-25 04:54:14+00:00): Nice work!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132914103
mavl (2023-04-23 16:08:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
Brummelwuff (2023-02-23 10:29:44+00:00): Hi, was hat denn das routing in der Ritterstraße mit der Einbahnstrße Wevelinghofergasse zu tun?
In den (alten) Mapillery bildern ist diese auch nicht für Fahrräder freigegeben https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=51.96338636796&lng=7.6336243841775&z=17&pKey=456687202093927&x=0.8853283876962779&y=0.338082058296409&zoom=2.9755178452489988&focus=photo
mavl (2023-04-23 16:10:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:55:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:58:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].