piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
MrMoehritz (2025-11-08 11:05:15+00:00): Hi Pingvin40,

thank you for your contribution. You have requested a review. As a newcomer it is not always easy to start mapping, so here are some points I would like to raise to help you improve your mapping:

- please keep your changes local: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets you made edits in France as well as in Bulgaria, creating a very large changeset that is hard to review.
- your changeset comment could be improved. You state that you fixed some issues but it is unclear where they stem from and what issues you fixed and how.
- the layer=-1 you added to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1325130349#map=19/49.562057/3.632231 is not correct. The road is visible so it is not under ground. I think you tried to fix the intersection with the building. If the road does in fact go through the building (difficult to see from the aerial imagery) then it should be mapped as described here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tunnel%3Dbuilding_passage
- you deleted and elevator: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13228408937 and steps https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1441705213 and replaced them with a tag https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4392774013 . In the process a lot of information was lost mainly the information on access, wheelchair-access and the pure information that there are steps

As a general remark, I would be cautious about the "error flagging tools" because the OSM community (which you are a part of) is very active and monitoring these tool. So my experience is that most of the still open errors are not that easy to fix or in fact false positives. So just because the error is gone does not mean the data has improved.

Happy Mapping

Mo
aaronsta (2025-11-06 04:52:53+00:00): https://www.mainroads.wa.gov.au/projects-initiatives/all-projects/metropolitan/Stephenson-Avenue-Extension/
fortera_au (2025-11-06 21:52:28+00:00): Hi, is there a source for this other than the mainroads.wa.gov.au website? Our waiver only covers their CC BY 4.0 datasets, not their website.

You've also removed an offramp that is visible on ESRI World Imagery, has that actually been removed?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174268772
aaronsta (2025-11-07 03:29:51+00:00): Hi fortera_au. There is no source, so no source information is included. This is based on visiting the site in person. The website provides supporting information about the closure of the offramp, but this is not a source for the edit. Works are underway to close the offramp, access has been restricted, and it will be closed fully in the coming days.
fortera_au (2025-11-07 03:37:02+00:00): Thanks for clarifying that. If you've checked in person, the best thing to put down as a source is "survey" for something you've specifically checked, or "local knowledge" if it's just something you're aware of because it's closer to you.

Without specifying one of those, then it's hard to not assume you've either copied from a copyrighted website or an unknown source.
Taya_S (2025-11-07 11:44:26+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174330042
Taya_S (2025-11-07 11:44:32+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174330042
dmjab13 (2025-11-06 14:24:31+00:00): please keep edits to one continent or area
habi (2025-11-07 09:55:42+00:00): Keeping changesets local makes them *much* easier to review, as you've requested.
I've only looked at one node in your changeset, namely https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/943028847 
If you'd looked at the available aerial imagery there it's immediately evident that this node should be a "highway=give_way" + "direction=forward".
It would be *much* more beneficial to the OSM data if you actually took care to change values to sensible ones.
habi (2025-11-07 10:03:13+00:00): For https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1167110204 any highway-tag seems unnecessary
habi (2025-11-07 10:05:33+00:00): Same for https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136967370
habi (2025-11-07 10:07:35+00:00): > Same for osm.org/changeset/136967370

Sorry, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1616113575/
habi (2025-11-07 10:12:11+00:00): All the higway=yes values you replaced on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/228504528 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/228504529 can - in my opinion - simply be removed.
habi (2025-11-07 10:18:46+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2793461769 is also tagged unnecessarily, if you'd have looked at the history of the node.
Taya_S (2025-11-07 11:44:48+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174330042
ManuelB701 (2025-11-06 06:05:29+00:00): Clearly an automated edit: You're replaced highway=yes indiscriminatingly into highway=road without ever checking if the data is even correct. In fact, both this and CS #174269141 didn't even edit any ways but rather guideposts (which follow *=yes pattern to denote the target group), a clear case why automated edits should be taken with care.
See also: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct

This is on top of the fact that these changesets leaves a huge footprint which makes them harder to review: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174269137
ika-chan! (2025-11-06 07:54:39+00:00): Undone in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174274003. Please consult the community at https://community.openstreetmap.org/ first.
silversurfer83 (2025-11-06 15:13:23+00:00): thanks ika-chan!

Flap, please talk first before embarking on these endeavors. thank you
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174269137
Taya_S (2025-11-07 11:45:17+00:00): Thanks ika-chan!, I've also gone ahead and reverted all additional changesets in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174330042
ManuelB701 (2025-11-06 06:06:11+00:00): Same issues as with #174269137: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174269137
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174269141
dmjab13 (2025-11-06 14:24:52+00:00): please keep edits to one continent or area
Taya_S (2025-11-07 11:45:23+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174330042
dmjab13 (2025-11-06 14:24:45+00:00): please keep edits to one continent or area
Baloo Uriza (2025-11-06 14:43:09+00:00): highway=road only works for linear features, not individual nodes.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174269157
Taya_S (2025-11-07 11:45:30+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174330042
ManuelB701 (2025-11-06 06:18:20+00:00): Almost the same issues as with CS #174269137, although this one does edit ways, at the very least. Many of these ways are areas, though, used to mark the areas of the corresponding road (granted, they might be better replaced by area:highway but this isn't what you had intended).

For comparison, only these ways were changed in the spirit of the CS (replacing highway=yes to highway=road for linear ways):
* https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/26243960
* https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1135087195
* https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/134548812

Few items enough that you could have fixed these manually by looking into their history and see how some users have mangled these objects in some way or another.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174269164
Taya_S (2025-11-07 11:45:35+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174330042
Taya_S (2025-11-07 11:45:45+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174330042
fortera_au (2025-11-06 22:07:53+00:00): Hi, before making this change, did you check out each of the objects? There is at least one node that you've now marked as highway=road, making me think this was an unchecked automated edit.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174269176
fortera_au (2025-11-06 22:08:37+00:00): Hi, before making this change, did you check out each of the objects? There is at least one node that you've now marked as highway=road, making me think this was an unchecked automated edit.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174269176
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-11-07 04:22:51+00:00): There were ~400 objects (IIRC), so I really only checked one (a random junction in California).
fortera_au (2025-11-07 04:27:35+00:00): Then this should be reverted, as the Automated Edits Code of Conduct hasn't been followed.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct
Taya_S (2025-11-07 11:21:39+00:00): Oh look, a building that is now a road https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/87250237/history/10

Oh look, a road that was removed https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1419581982/history/4

Oh look, a proposed bypass: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1426129772/history/2

And many more. These ways weren't hard to find. At least before this they were basically undefined junk data.

Your edits here perfectly capture what can go wrong with badly though out automated edits. They fit in perfectly with the examples from this page:  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/What%27s_the_problem_with_mechanical_edits%3F
Taya_S (2025-11-07 11:45:53+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174330042
Taya_S (2025-11-07 12:00:13+00:00): May I also remind you of this paragraph of the Automated Edits Code of Conduct: 

The purpose of this policy is to avoid the database being damaged. Be very aware that it can be hard or impossible to revert or 'roll back' inappropriate edits, particularly where further edits have been made to features touched by the changes and careless automated edits can therefore create considerable work for other parties to repair the damage. Ignoring this policy will be treated as vandalism and will be responded to as such if it persists.
Taya_S (2025-11-07 11:45:59+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174330042
vanyvershh (2025-11-06 05:32:44+00:00): Какое-то ненужное отношение добавил и хз как убрать
NeisBot (2025-11-06 05:27:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisBot (2025-11-06 05:27:42+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Self storage facility near GVSU Allendale campus"
NeisReview (2025-11-08 21:48:43+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/174272480
ieguy3 (2025-11-06 05:40:33+00:00): oh grass in front of business is not a forest
ieguy3 (2025-11-06 05:42:05+00:00): neither is the parking lots
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:39:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321396 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Chile
angys (2025-11-18 12:19:30+00:00): The Bukit chagar is not operational station yet, should put it as construction station not railway station
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:26:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186320984 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Argentina
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:26:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186320984 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Argentina
NeisBot (2025-11-06 06:36:25+00:00): Hi Dario Marcelo Satan sanunga, welcome to the OSM projekt and thanks for your contribution!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish
NeisBot (2025-11-06 06:36:26+00:00): Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Adjusted node geometry"
evgenykatyshev (2025-11-06 13:38:33+00:00): Maybe add highway=turning_circle then?
Tomas Straupis (2025-11-06 13:54:23+00:00): Well, you can, but they are not used in practice anyway.
ratrun (2025-11-07 04:46:59+00:00): Hi,

you created a way without tags: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1447881388#map=18/14.337654/120.850291&layers=VN

can you please check?
Yog Sot (2025-11-06 19:03:47+00:00): ja byk widać, że to drive through

service=drive-through - stosowany do oznaczania drogi, na której klienci mogą kupić produkty bez wysiadania ze swoich samochodów.
YomanNH (2025-11-06 19:11:26+00:00): Tak.
user_5359 (2025-11-06 07:02:29+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database.
Please only draw in existing objects and facts. I have now reverted your changes.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-06 18:23:08+00:00): And even bigger thanks for fix and for mapping it in the first place!
user_5359 (2025-11-06 11:49:52+00:00): Hello! Please review your change. I encourage you to delete the option to turn left from Shields Road onto APD Highway, which leads off the map on the right side. This is why the relation https://www.osm.org/relation/12528109 is broken. The aerial view allows it, but I am not familiar with the local traffic regulations.
Liam_100292 (2025-11-08 11:15:58+00:00): Oh I see, you are allowed to turn left here, should I have extended Shields Road all the way to the other side then where that relation starts?
user_5359 (2025-11-08 11:21:24+00:00): You can only tell if it's allowed by looking at the location itself, but based on the aerial view and the existence of the relation, I would say yes.
Liam_100292 (2025-11-08 11:58:02+00:00): Thank you! I believe I have fixed it now
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:41:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321499 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Madagascar
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:41:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321499 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Madagascar
SomeoneElse (2025-11-30 19:42:04+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!,

On this changeset you've used a "source=Google Maps" tag. We can't actually use that as a source in OSM because Google's licence doesn't allow it to be used here - it would cause real problems for the project if we were found to be using Google Maps as a source.
If this is somewhere that you are familiar with, then "source=local_knowledge" would be perfectly OK. If not, we'll have to undo this change.

Best Regards
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:41:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321499 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Madagascar
Sanniu (2025-11-09 08:16:13+00:00): Hi, the new road https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1067875471 crosses existing one and not connected at the north end. Can you fix this?
Kl90 (2025-11-14 05:27:50+00:00): I can't fix it, how can I? I'm new to this.
SafwatHalaby (2025-11-14 23:37:15+00:00): hello!

Look here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=id#map=21/31.9442188/34.8495068

Notice that the end of hazayet is not connected to anything.

You should probably move it slightly right and connect it to Elyaho in the right spot
SafwatHalaby (2025-11-14 23:39:47+00:00): Click the end of haZayet and drag it with the mouse. If you release the mouse over another road it will connect to it.
Sanniu (2025-12-10 08:44:04+00:00): I've moved and connected the road, need resurvey there...
osmviborg (2025-11-06 07:21:46+00:00): Dette er den rigtige måde: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1447889477
Negreheb (2025-11-06 09:52:36+00:00): Servus Markus, schön, dass du mitmachst. Hier hast du versehentlich die Wiese über das andere Grundstück gezogen und das gesamte Wohngebiet von Wolfsgraben verkleinert :) 
Das ist nicht die Grundstücksgrenze (die wird tatsächlich nicht in OSM eingetragen), sondern grob die die Wohnfläche gesamt.
Markus Hechl (2025-11-06 10:34:17+00:00): Hallo Negreheb,

oh, das tut mir leid! War nicht meine Absicht!

Dann ist diese Änderung hinfällig!

LG Markus
Negreheb (2025-11-06 10:43:49+00:00): Alles gut, ich habs auch schon wieder richtig hingezogen. Es kann sein, dass es noch kurz dauert, bis die Anzeige auch nachgekommen ist, aber das passt schon. 
Wenn du Fragen hast, kannst du dich gern an mich wenden. Alles gute, Stefan
NeisBot (2025-11-06 07:36:39+00:00): Hello, thank you for your contribution.

Your changeset was commented because it appears to follow a pattern that could be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related.

Could you kindly confirm if your map edits were intentional?

#MapWithoutSpam #Name #Comment
NeisRevert (2025-11-06 07:54:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/174274069
where the changeset comment is: 
Remove vandalism
archie (2025-11-06 08:12:15+00:00): Hej, flytta inte vägar m m till fel position. Om du använder Bing som bildbakgrund måste du justera den först. Den visar inte rätt position förän du lägesjusterat den. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Using_aerial_imagery
Ändra inte på taggning på gc-vägarna tack.
f3w (2025-11-06 08:19:33+00:00): Ok, sorry ser nu att du importerat från NVDB tidigare så ska ju vara mer korrekt även om det ser fel ut mot satellit. Men gc var bara taggad "path", varför ska den inte taggas som gång/cykel istället?
maasa123 (2025-11-09 08:20:01+00:00): Cycleway är endast för cykelväg. 
Path + bicycle=designated och foot=designated används för GC
HantDX (2025-11-06 08:17:42+00:00): Эта усадьба ещё стоит там, не развалилась? Хотел эти места посетить.
Andrey Blinov (2025-11-06 08:56:18+00:00): На спутниковых снимках она четко видна, но состояние конечно вызывает вопросы. Думаю в любом случае остатки должны были сохраниться.
Norbert Wołowiec (2025-11-06 10:19:49+00:00): Tam na kolejowej przejazd zamknięty całkowicie i bez przejścia
Tomek | Yanosik (2025-11-06 10:32:03+00:00): dzięki, poprawiłem zgodnie z informacją
Alliegaytor (2025-11-06 10:26:55+00:00): Instead of using oneway=-1 you can simply reverse the way. oneway=yes is much more intuitive than oneway=-1

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:oneway=-1
fortera_au (2025-11-06 21:58:38+00:00): The way was reversed, but JOSM and iD will change the oneway tag to -1 assuming that you want the direction the oneway applies to, to remain the same.

If you're reversing a way to change the direction oneway applies to, you need to keep the tag as yes.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174274947
Ltrlg (2025-11-06 12:53:44+00:00): « D.B.R » (avec les points) est-il utilisé ainsi sur place ? Leur site web (https://dbr-impression.fr/) a l’air d’utiliser systématiquement la forme « DBR » (sans points).
user_5359 (2025-11-06 11:37:38+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Sorry, but business entries without addresses are not in line with OSM. I revert this as SPAM.
eggie (2025-11-06 09:52:19+00:00): Dag Rob,

Waarom
charge=5.22 EUR/hour
fee=no

Dan klopt 'no' toch niet... of mis ik iets.

MVG
eggie
RobH28 (2025-11-06 09:56:50+00:00): Hallo Eggie, 

Ik zag dit staan op de wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:fee): 

fee=no + fee:conditional=yes @ Mo-Fr 09:00-19:00

Het leek mij dat hetzelfde hier ook van toepassing is, maar ik wist het niet zeker. Dankjewel alvast.

Rob
eggie (2025-11-06 10:07:50+00:00): Ahh oke...   Alleen bepaalde tijden. 
Thx voor je reactie. 
eggie
NeisBot (2025-11-06 09:26:44+00:00): 你好 Rii_C，欢迎来到 OSM 项目，谢谢你的贡献！

为了使合作更容易，并帮助他人理解你的编辑，最好添加一个关于你所做的修改的简短描述。清晰的评论可以帮助社区跟踪你的工作并提供更好的反馈。你可以在这里[1]找到写好评论的提示。
(Auto-translation)
---
Hi Rii_C, welcome to the OSM projekt and thanks for your contribution!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish
NeisBot (2025-11-06 09:26:47+00:00): 這裡有一個基於你地圖編輯的示例評論：“添加、更新、刪除未分類道路”
(Auto-translation)
---
Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added, updated, removed unclassified roads"
NeisBot (2025-11-06 09:33:38+00:00): Hello, thank you for your contribution.

Your changeset was commented because it appears to follow a pattern that could be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related.

Could you kindly confirm if your map edits were intentional?

#MapWithoutSpam #URLs
Taya_S (2025-11-06 10:02:26+00:00): Reverted SEO vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174279193
Ltrlg (2025-11-06 12:50:07+00:00): Vues la taille et l’apparence en imagerie, ça ressemble plutôt à des jardins familiaux (`landuse=allotments`) ?
Tomas09 (2025-11-09 20:51:45+00:00): Deutsch ist nicht meine muttersprache es tut mir leid. können wir englisch sprechen so das ich ihr hilfen kann?
UdoAH (2025-11-13 04:10:31+00:00): yes no problem.
Tomas09 (2025-11-13 08:07:36+00:00): You asked for a rewiew so the changeset looks good but as fat as i know it is better to put a node and add the adress onto that instead of the building itself. If you dont understand i could edit these two buildings and you could see the changes.
UdoAH (2025-11-13 18:26:13+00:00): Sure, you can do that. I'm a complete beginner and a resident of one of the houses, and I just want delivery services and food suppliers to be able to find me.
Tomas09 (2025-11-13 19:36:52+00:00): I added adress nodes. Feel free to rearrange them as to where they are in the buildings, or ask me any questions you might have (and keep on mapping more and more (:
UdoAH (2025-11-14 15:56:49+00:00): Thank you very much for Help!

I've finally drag the numbers above the house entrances. I deleted numbers 17, 19, and 23 because they don't exist.
joost schouppe (2025-11-06 10:06:51+00:00): Reverts changesets 174267455 174267446 174267437 174267427 174267683 174267630 174267605 174267592 174267583 174267567 174267536 174267512 174267500 174267491 174267478 174267475 174267469 174267458
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:42:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321518 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Namibia
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:42:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321504 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Mauritania
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:40:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321408 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Congo-Kinshasa
fndoder (2025-11-30 16:07:32+00:00): Тут вышел небольшой промах со зданием для адреса. Адрес был добавлен строящемуся корпусу, адрес которому ещё не присвоен.

Фактически этот адрес у соседней пары корпусов, где недавно открылась гостиница.

Я поправил - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175320375
Ozon OSM4 (2026-06-21 11:30:49+00:00): Спасибо
dmjab13 (2025-11-06 14:23:55+00:00): please keep changesets like this to one area, the large area clogs history feeds everywhere
ilias_ (2025-11-06 14:24:50+00:00): yes, please don't change names in metropolitan france AND french polynesia in the same changeset.
bartgron (2025-11-11 16:01:22+00:00): Po raz kolejny zapytam: czy dodana firma zajmuje CAŁY budynek?
bartgron (2025-11-11 22:10:55+00:00): Nazwa została usunięta.
Pozdrawiam