piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
kartler175 (2024-12-28 12:49:03+00:00): Hat das einen Grund, warum Du das Äußere Polygon  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/158529665 gelöscht und damite das Multipolygon https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=7.91286&lat=53.64590&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.95&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways verstümmelt hast? Ähnliches hattest Du bereits mit der MP-Relation https://osm.mapki.com/history/relation/2123680 gemacht.
Kaffeekirsche (2024-12-28 13:59:45+00:00): Ich hab etwas Kaputt gemacht? Das war nicht meine Absicht. Ich war eigentlich nur dabei die Bereiche für landuse:farmland und landuse:meadow zu definieren. und einige Straßen Verläufe zu optimieren.

Ich muss mal sehen wie ich die Changeset die davon betroffen sind vllt wieder rückgänig zu machen
mueschel (2024-12-29 10:07:34+00:00): Hi,
is this a shop that services vacuum pumps and devices or vacuum cleaners? Is this the only thing they do?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11345139385
J T E (2025-01-04 04:43:04+00:00): Hi, the signs in the windows etc. all describe it as a vacuum cleaner repair shop. Looking on their Yelp (https://www.yelp.com/biz_photos/oreck-clean-home-center-temecula-2), evidently this is still their primary business, but they do a bunch of other things on the side, incl. selling cleaning chemicals and repairing other appliances (including a clock). Looking it up on the wiki now - I think shop=vacuum_cleaner, repair=yes is correct?
J T E (2025-01-04 05:03:24+00:00): Looking it up I can't tell whether I'm supposed to reference Yelp or not, but to be clear "the signs in the windows etc." is based on what I saw with my own eyes.
Paul Berry (2025-01-05 22:15:16+00:00): Now added to the correct location, according to the original address of 413 Murray Street, Perth, WA, 6000, Australia. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/147937910
Fizzie-DWG (2025-01-27 02:22:29+00:00): DWG revert - Google Maps used as Source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161801669
mueschel (2024-12-29 10:39:42+00:00): Hi,
what does "sport:skilift=green" and "Skilift" mean? Lifts are commonly mapped as 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:aerialway
sb9576 (2024-12-29 10:26:25+00:00): Thank you. You got to it before I did.
InfernoOSM (2025-01-03 10:36:33+00:00): Werribee, Frankston, and Mornington are suburbs and not separate towns/cities from Melbourne and should not be tagged as such. Also, you used population data from the Local Government Area of Frankston instead of the suburb of Frankston. These changes have been reverted. Please let me know if you have any questions.
tastrax (2025-01-03 11:46:04+00:00): Its best practice to have a meaningful changeset comment rather than just "minor edit". nN this case it could have been "updates to Spirit of Tasmania traffic lanes". That assists other mappers in understanding what has changed. Cheers
nevw (2024-12-28 12:02:44+00:00): May I ask why you have deliberately misspelt photography.
Radnoski (2024-12-28 12:49:08+00:00): Just a typo.  Now fixed.
nevw (2024-12-28 22:31:26+00:00): OK, thanks for fixing.
MarinoBM (2024-12-29 19:21:13+00:00): Hola Roadwaykeith, gracias por colaborar con OpenStreetMap.
El reto con el que participas en StreetComplete consiste en indicar sin una vía dispone de iluminación o no. Estás indicando en todas que sí cuando sé con seguridad que no es correcto, que muchos de los tramos no están iluminados.
Revisa tus ediciones.
Un saludo.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-12-29 02:56:09+00:00): This changeset left a missing connection. Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160736531
Please make sure you have the relevant JOSM validators enabled to warn about these.
Thanks
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-12-29 02:58:52+00:00): Sorry wrong changeset. Disconnect was introduced in https://osmcha.org/changesets/160700821
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-12-29 02:59:46+00:00): * https://osmcha.org/changesets/160736531
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-12-29 03:02:20+00:00): ** https://osmcha.org/changesets/160690552
This is 100% definitively the changeset that introduced it sorry for spam.
jhaluska80 (2024-12-29 03:48:44+00:00): I have validators enabled but I'm overwhelmed by the number of them in the area.  I tried to fix as many as I could, but somehow that one slipped through.  Thanks for catching it.

I'm still working on the area as I'm trying to figure out why OSRM has a poor route to the airport.
JassKurn (2025-01-01 17:19:06+00:00): Hi,
You added highway=footway to the edge of a heath multipolygon. I assumed this was a blunder so 
I removed the footway in changeset - 160874950
JassKurn (2025-01-01 18:47:18+00:00): Looking at it further, there are a number of issues in the consecutive changesets you made here. In your next changeset you tried to fix the errors that were being indicated to you by adding fords where the wrongly mapped footway crossed streams.

In this and the next edit you've converted path to footway, when there is a local preference for these Dartmoor ways to be mapped as paths.

I reverted the two changesets in 160879128 & 160700871 

I'll look at the paths that were added and add them were appropriate in a new edit.
HellMap (2024-12-28 20:36:47+00:00): Kāpēc ir izdzēst Iecavas parks https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1200159536 ?

Kāpēc izdzēsta ēka nevis pārzīmēta https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/188940199 ?

Kāpēc izdzēsta teritorija? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/944841225

Un visas meža teritorijas ir izdzēstas nevis labotas.
JassKurn (2025-01-01 18:50:25+00:00): There are a number of issues in the consecutive changesets you made here. In this changeset you tried to fix the errors that were created by the wrongly added footway.

In this and the previous edit you've converted path to footway, when there is a local preference for these Dartmoor horse & foot ways to be mapped as paths.

I reverted the two changesets in 160879128 & 160700871

I'll look at the paths that were added and add them were appropriate in a new edit.
iandees (2024-12-29 23:36:14+00:00): Why are you deleting these sidewalk areas? These are useful for pedestrian routing.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160701420
Fraxi (2024-12-28 11:10:32+00:00): Мерси.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-12-28 08:36:46+00:00): Are you mapping only in places you visited in person?

Or are you using Google Street View or you are guessing.

As one of authors of StreetComplete: please, use it only for objects that you seen in person
SomeoneElse (2024-12-28 17:01:55+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17010

@mateusz - will SC display a 0-hour block to the user?
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-12-28 22:38:18+00:00): No idea. I guess that I will need to test it on dev server.
SomeoneElse (2024-12-30 23:18:07+00:00): See https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete/issues/6062#issuecomment-2564842136 and https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/is-this-the-same-person/123461 .
Roadwaykeith (2025-01-03 03:04:01+00:00): Google street view
SomeoneElse (2025-01-03 03:10:06+00:00): You cannot use Google Street View to update OSM because the licence is not compatible
mueschel (2024-12-29 09:58:24+00:00): Hi,
please check this node, is it a village or a restaurant?
f_kia (2024-12-29 11:14:07+00:00): Hello,
It is a village and there was a mistake in my edit. I have corrected it.

Thank you for awaring me of that
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-12-28 12:19:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 160711160 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits by an account created to evade blocks.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17008
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-12-28 12:19:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 160711160 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits by an account created to evade blocks.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17008
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-12-28 12:19:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 160711160 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits by an account created to evade blocks.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17008
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-12-28 12:19:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 160711160 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits by an account created to evade blocks.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17008
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-03 14:52:54+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1030840560/history has building = 93.5 that was added in this edit
What this tag means? Numeric value is unexpected here and it is unclear what it means
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-12-28 12:19:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 160711160 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits by an account created to evade blocks.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17008
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-12-28 12:18:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 160711160 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits by an account created to evade blocks.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17008
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-12-28 12:18:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 160711160 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits by an account created to evade blocks.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17008
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-12-28 12:19:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 160711160 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits by an account created to evade blocks.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17008
Allison P (2024-12-28 21:39:26+00:00): building=proposed is a trolltag, use lifecycle prefix proposed:building=retail and proposed:amenity=cafe
Jarrardi (2024-12-30 10:30:09+00:00): Thanks tons! I had assumed without thinking that since ID prefers building=construction to construction:building, it would be the same for proposed. But I can see why this isn't the case (a building=proposed doesn't yet exist, but a building=construction does).
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-12-28 12:19:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 160711160 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits by an account created to evade blocks.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17008
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-12-28 12:19:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 160711160 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits by an account created to evade blocks.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17008
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-12-28 12:19:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 160711160 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits by an account created to evade blocks.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17008
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-12-28 12:19:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 160711160 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits by an account created to evade blocks.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17008
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-12-28 12:19:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 160711160 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits by an account created to evade blocks.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17008
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-12-28 12:19:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 160711160 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits by an account created to evade blocks.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17008
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-12-28 12:19:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 160711160 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits by an account created to evade blocks.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17008
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-12-28 12:18:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 160711160 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits by an account created to evade blocks.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17008
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-12-28 12:19:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 160711160 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits by an account created to evade blocks.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17008
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-12-28 12:19:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 160711160 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits by an account created to evade blocks.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17008
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-12-28 12:19:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 160711160 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits by an account created to evade blocks.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17008
Filip009 (2024-12-28 14:20:13+00:00): Zdravím, nachádza sa na jednom mieste aj bar aj reštaurácia s rovnakým názvom? Pokiaľ sa líšia aspoň otváracími hodinami, tak chápem prečo sú 2. Inak odporúčam jedno odstrániť.
Milan Batovsky (2024-12-28 15:02:08+00:00): Krcma Mikes garage odstranena - ponechana restauracia Mikes garage .
Syl (2025-01-20 14:59:01+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai modifié le type du mur, ça n'a pas l'air d'être un rempart ou une muraille.
ivanbranco (2024-12-28 08:51:08+00:00): Hi, mimicking nicknames and using deceiving changeset comments is useless. OSM has tools to detect changesets like yours. You're just wasting your time (the edits will likely be reverted) and other people time. Why continuing? Maybe you should consider a break from OpenStreetMap, creating this amount of accounts for this long span of time for zero results is just illogical.
Jordi MF (2024-12-28 19:30:00+00:00): Thanks ivanbranco and SomeoneElse_Revert. Unfortunately, I think this user never reads the messages we leave him in the changesets because he creates fake accounts with new fictitious emails that he never checks. Therefore, the only way to try to communicate with him is by sending him a private message.

Since he contacted me privately months ago to insult me, state political reasons and threaten me with physical harm, I decided that I would not talk to him again or participate in debates in which he is present. It is a pity that, as well as debates within the community usually work, in this case it could not be resolved.
Thanks again.
citrula (2024-12-29 07:30:39+00:00): No need to put the address in the name field - the address tags are enough :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160703748
mavl (2025-05-13 15:04:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-21 17:50:42+00:00): Hi Kelvin,

I just wanted to give you a ping that @Formosa%20Topo removed the station tags you added to building "銀河號" in changeset 186101186 . I reverted their change as it was explicitly sourced from Google Maps and didn't appear to be discussed, but I wanted to give you a ping so you could discuss it with them on that changeset if desired.

https://osm.org/changeset/186101186

Thanks, and happy mapping!
Andrea Musuruane (2024-12-29 09:05:16+00:00): Ciao. Hai inserito un highway=path, ovvero un sentiero. Un sentiero non consente il passaggio alle auto. Cosa volevi inserire? Una track? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtrack Dalla fonte citata (Bing Maps Aerial), non si riesce a vedere questa feature. Ciao, Andrea
Heise_nberg (2024-12-29 11:23:56+00:00): sì, intendevo inserire una strada agricola. ho modificato la strada
upc92 (2024-12-28 09:24:06+00:00): Somewhere at the side of tertiaries is the sidepath not Cycle path. But there it is.
Branko Kokanovic (2024-12-28 16:25:29+00:00): as explained in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160318824 reverted as #vandalism
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-09 12:06:49+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12458601104/history has flag:type = commercial that was added in this edit
what was meant by flag:type=commercial ? How it differs from flag:type=advertising ?
Seraq (2026-02-09 13:05:25+00:00): Hello, it was a mistake. I will correct it. Thank you very much.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-09 16:20:12+00:00): Thanks!
DD1GJ (2025-01-06 22:40:52+00:00): wieder gelöscht, da bereits seit Jahren vorhanden: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3235871215/history
StC (2024-12-29 21:00:41+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre qui passe par là. Je m'occupe de la réparation.
MihaelIvanjek (2025-01-17 19:46:58+00:00): Reverting because of a wrongly tagged road #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161468892
Tommybara (2024-12-28 19:20:53+00:00): Hiện công cụ tìm kiếm của OSM vẫn chưa nhận diện được từ "ga" trong tiếng Việt tương đương với "station" trong tiếng Anh, nên nếu bỏ từ "Ga" đi thì khi tìm kiếm bằng từ khóa "Ga Bến Thành" sẽ không cho ra được kết quả cần tìm. Nó khác với trường hợp từ khóa "34th Street-Herald Square station" là do từ này bản thân nó đã là tiếng Anh nên mới tra ra được.
IvaLedinščak (2025-01-12 19:30:32+00:00): Reverted because of unnecessary node creations #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161285075
Enock4seth (2025-01-01 13:46:11+00:00): Hi, stop adding building nodes within building areas. This doesn't add any useful information to OpenStreetMap. If you are still not sure what OpenStreetMap is, here is a good starting resource https://welcome.openstreetmap.org/
somehundred (2024-12-28 10:50:31+00:00): https://maproulette.org/challenge/50055/task/266774627
misterte (2024-12-28 14:38:27+00:00): wieso hast Du hier Postleitzahlen gelöscht ?
mavl (2025-02-05 14:03:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162167075 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted. Reason: wrong values for name:en - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161608012].
antimuscovy (2025-05-22 14:16:31+00:00):  you are violating the agreements of the Ukrainian community and are waging wars editing https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:denomination#Christian_denominations 

For the the agreements of the Ukrainian community https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:denomination#Christian_denominations  of the Openstreetmap project, the Orthodox Church of Ukraine denomination is responsible for ukrainian_orthodox
antimuscovy (2025-05-22 14:28:47+00:00): I made a mistake, don't pay attention, another cartographer did it.
Colbertson (2025-05-23 10:26:32+00:00): I was just going through taginfo and doing "small" edits like fixing spaces/underscores/dashes/etc to make tagging more even. This one was kinda iffy i guess but i didnt want to mess things up incase the "church of" value was useful in other ways like the patriarchite thing others are tagged with.
IvaLedinščak (2024-12-31 13:06:39+00:00): Reverted because of an unnecessary node #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160831875
somehundred (2024-12-28 10:49:04+00:00): https://maproulette.org/challenge/50055/task/266810372
BCNorwich (2025-01-03 09:01:01+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

It's not logical to have foot and cycle access allowed on a highway tagged access+no.  I assume you mean the is no vehicle access in which case the tag would be vehicle:access=no. I've amended the tag.

Regards Bernard.
$teve£ (2025-01-03 10:23:45+00:00): Thanks, well spotted
Langlaeufer (2025-01-10 09:03:21+00:00): Hallo MadestCat,
wenn du Fußwege unbedingt sepeart einzeichen möchtest, dann sollstest du darauf achten, das du die wichtigsten Übergänge einzeichnest (i.d Regel mindestens an den Kreuzungen). Anderenfalls geht das Fußgängerrouting kaput, weil die "Geweginseln" nicht erreicht oder verlassen werden können.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160708513
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-04 08:10:38+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12458763845/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
eggie (2024-12-28 11:20:46+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback  Je hebt wel een gebouw uit het lood gelegd zo te zien..
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=160708950

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
chickadee321 (2024-12-28 11:37:34+00:00): Hoi Eggie,

Bedankt voor het uitgebreide welkomstbericht! 

Aiii, dat was niet de bedoeling. Ik heb het gebouw weer gerepareerd in 160709721.

Met vriendelijke groeten,
Chickadee321
eggie (2024-12-28 11:47:58+00:00): Ah... Top!
mcliquid (2024-12-28 13:11:47+00:00): Hallo, warum hast du beim Ausbildungsplatz Niederdorf das "landuse=military" entfernt?

Und "water_source=wasserleitung" ist kein korrekter Wert. Hier sollte es vermutlich "water_source=main" sein.
wildmaps (2025-01-06 17:31:58+00:00): Hallo, ich habe den Ausbildungsplatz den ich erstellt habe jetzt wieder korrigiert. Der Änderungssatz bleibt mir ein Rätsel.
mcliquid (2025-01-06 17:35:13+00:00): Danke, die "water_source" habe ich nun angepasst: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161068011
Yog Sot (2024-12-28 18:59:09+00:00): a jak kierują tablice z kierunkami na miejscowości przy tej drodze i na dotychczasowej drodze głownej?
Yunkers (2025-01-16 19:28:50+00:00): Jeśli to obwodnica to należało też obniżyć kategorię dotychczasowej secondary.
Allison P (2024-12-28 21:47:49+00:00): addr:city should not be in all caps, and addr:street should be fully unabbreviated (West 200 North, not W 200 N).
BCNorwich (2025-01-03 09:14:27+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

If there is some form of access then the tag access=no would be incorrect. You have added the tag motor_vehicle=no which excludes public vehicle access, that's correct. It looks like the general access tag should be access=agricultural, thus I've amended the tag.

Regards Bernard.
silversurfer83 (2025-01-02 13:55:02+00:00): Gude :)

könntest du den Grund für die Löschung vielleicht ein wenig weiter ausführen. Dein Kommentar ist in dem Belang nämlich nicht sehr hilfreich. Danke

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
Dodko (2025-01-30 10:07:16+00:00): Opravené ref:minvskaddress
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/59451496/history
Dodko (2025-02-04 19:36:14+00:00): Opravené ref:minvskaddress 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/59450926/history
NorthCrab_upload (2024-12-28 12:00:48+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4447157812
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/254430903

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-12-29 11:13:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 160745112 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits by an account created to evade blocks. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17017