piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Minh Nguyen (2025-12-17 23:38:51+00:00): Hi Doug, there’s some discussion in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171036308 as well as a bunch of scattered threads in OSMUS Slack. [1] A bunch of preserves in the area had been split up into “open” and “closed” boundaries, but the global community has been calling this into question because in reality it’s just one preserve.

The favored approach these days is to map distinct boundary=forest_compartment ways or relations inside the original boundary. As a starting point, we have “closed area” compartments such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/298116730 , since we haven’t mapped any individual parcels. Others have been mapping the compartments; I’ve only been tidying them up to share the same nodes.

boundary=forest_compartment is a relatively new tag. Unfortunately, the Standard layer doesn’t render it at all. The Tracestrack Topo layer does outline them but doesn’t label them as far as I can tell. Only OsmAnd labels them.

[1] https://osmus.slack.com/archives/CCJ2P6KCH/p1746564953498049
doug_sfba (2025-12-18 03:18:11+00:00): Hi Minh, Thanks for the explanation. boundary=forest_compartment makes sense in the context of industrial forestry. It seems strangely counter-intuitive to apply it to protected_areas which often have nothing at all to do with forests. However, I guess this isn't the forum to discuss..
Minh Nguyen (2025-12-18 03:46:29+00:00): Yeah, I agree that it’s a weird misnomer in this context. Basically all we need is a top-level feature tag to apply to whatever area we tag as access=private. Modeling it as a nature preserve inside a nature preserve seems counterintuitive. That happens to converge with the rationale for mapping actual forest compartments, but I think we’d all be open to a more fitting tag as long as we can drum up enough support for it among data consumers.
eggie (2025-08-30 21:48:04+00:00): In dat geval de accesstags toevoegen 
vehicle=no als het ook voor fietsers geldt. 
foot=yes

Als die fietsers er ook langs kunnen dan bicycle=yes 
Je kunt ook een slingertje eromheen maken met highway=path
NorthCrab_upload (2025-08-30 21:50:49+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13109325324

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eggie (2025-08-30 21:44:57+00:00): Correct..
Evt specificeren.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycle_barrier

cycle_barrier=double

Yep het gaat heel ver.
eggie (2025-08-30 21:50:58+00:00): Lastig voor mij om te bepalen op afstand, maar up to you...  De wiki geeft het antwoord.
eggie (2025-08-30 21:48:49+00:00): Top!
b-jazz (2025-08-31 17:30:08+00:00): RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1426109119

Please don't use the "lollipop" style of mapping golf course elements as you've done in the URL above. You need to create proper multipolygon relations in order to map features like roughs/bunkers that are within other features like fairways. Please see https://osm.wiki/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls and https://osm.wiki/wiki/Relation:multipolygon for help in understanding how to map this situation. If those aren't clear, please let me know and I'll help explain them further. Thanks.
pesticides (2025-08-30 21:59:53+00:00): Removed the oneway:bicycle=no tags because these streets no longer allow contraflow bike traffic—both have a one-way protected bike lane on the left side that flows in the same direction as the general purpose lanes. Removed cycleway:left:oneway=-1 because, on streets with oneway=yes, cycleways on both the left and right side are assumed to go in the same direction as the general purpose lanes. Adding cycleway:left:oneway=-1 would make it a contraflow bike lane, which it's not. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway:right:oneway#Implicit_values for details.
ToniE (2025-08-30 22:04:09+00:00): Details und Alignments im Umfeld "Bahnhof Asperg (Landkreis Ludwigsburg)" im Rahmen der NVBW-Mappingaktion
eggie (2025-08-31 05:00:52+00:00): Tip   Op een paaltje nooit motor_ vehicle=no taggen.
Dat geeft problemen voor bv moped en mofa.
Dat =no is al ingebakken in een paaltje.. (default)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Tag:barrier%3Dbollard

impliceert

    area=no
    access=no
    foot=yes
    bicycle=yes
    mofa=yes
    moped=yes
eggie (2025-08-31 05:03:46+00:00): .. en weer verwijderd,,

Ga svp al je paaltjes langs.. Vooral bromfietspaden en paaltjes in reguliere wegen en verwijder motor_vehicle=no

Je changesets
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Karel973/history#map=12/52.5004/5.9429
eggie (2025-08-31 05:37:11+00:00): Hier kun je vinden waar motor_vehicle wel of niet terecht is.
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2aSy
eggie (2025-08-31 05:41:34+00:00): Iets groter gebied https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2aSC

Het hoeft niet fout te zijn, maar wel op een bollard
eggie (2025-08-31 07:48:09+00:00): Karel.. Even goed om te weten. Zodra je gaat knippen met editor iD  in wegen met routerelaties kunnen de routes stuk gaan 
Meestal wordt het achter je rug weer hersteld zonder dat je het merkt of je krijg plots een opmerking en denkt .. gut wat heb ik nu gedaan. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=14/52.48354/5.95133&layers=C

Je kunt alleen routes bewerken met editor JOSM.

Verder 2 typen beton..   = concrete en =concrete:plates

Up to you

De route is hier nog heel of wellicht weer hersteld. 

MVG
eggie
mweper (2025-08-31 21:44:38+00:00): ¿Por qué "ACA" y no "YPF" ?
serock (2025-09-01 01:40:35+00:00): Hola mweper, el nombre de la estación de servicio es "ACA", independientemente de la marcar de combustible que venda, pasa algo parecido con "Gulf", los combustible son de "YPF", la diferencia es que uno esta todo unificado y el otro no.

Esto es algo que se hablo (note=Por favor, no agregar la marca de la estación en name=*, a menos que esté exactamente explícito, eso va en brand=*) y al final se separo una cosa de la otra, y es por eso que varias estaciones tienen en name: El Cruce, La Curva, La Rotonda, etc. independiente del "brand".

Lo mismo pasa con los que ponen en "name": EG3, PDV Sur, Esso, Oil, Dapsa, Isaura, Astra, San Lorenzo, Repsol, Petrobras, Rhasa, Texaco, Sol, etc., ya desaparecieron, pero en "brand" (cuando en realidad son "brand=Bandera Blanca") ponen lo mismo que en "name".

Si ud. cree que no corresponde o esta mal, siéntase libre de modificarlo o borrarlo, no hay problema de mi parte.

Saludos !!!
mweper (2025-08-31 21:44:31+00:00): ¿Por qué "ACA" y no "YPF" ?
serock (2025-09-01 01:40:22+00:00): Hola mweper, el nombre de la estación de servicio es "ACA", independientemente de la marcar de combustible que venda, pasa algo parecido con "Gulf", los combustible son de "YPF", la diferencia es que uno esta todo unificado y el otro no.

Esto es algo que se hablo (note=Por favor, no agregar la marca de la estación en name=*, a menos que esté exactamente explícito, eso va en brand=*) y al final se separo una cosa de la otra, y es por eso que varias estaciones tienen en name: El Cruce, La Curva, La Rotonda, etc. independiente del "brand".

Lo mismo pasa con los que ponen en "name": EG3, PDV Sur, Esso, Oil, Dapsa, Isaura, Astra, San Lorenzo, Repsol, Petrobras, Rhasa, Texaco, Sol, etc., ya desaparecieron, pero en "brand" (cuando en realidad son "brand=Bandera Blanca") ponen lo mismo que en "name".

Si ud. cree que no corresponde o esta mal, siéntase libre de modificarlo o borrarlo, no hay problema de mi parte.

Saludos !!!
mweper (2025-09-01 10:16:02+00:00): Está bien, solo preguntaba porque no encuentro info sobre la estación en la web de ACA, y me pareció raro el mismo nombre en las 3. Por lo general se complementa con el nombre de la sucursal, por ej. ACA Oroño, ACA San Martín, etc.
serock (2025-09-01 14:05:38+00:00): Hola mweper, le paso un resumen  de la info.

El ACA e YPF: El Automóvil Club Argentino (ACA) fue fundado en 1904 como club social y deportivo, en 1936 el ACA firmó un convenio con YPF que le permitió, poblar de estaciones de servicio el país. De esa manera el ACA llevaba el expendió de combustible a todos los caminos, regiones y lugares
alejados de todo el país, beneficiando a los socios del club ACA, y a la comunidad, ya que se llegaba a lugares donde nadie de iniciativa privada había llegado...

También los socios del club ACA, tienen descuentos por cargar combustible en sus estaciones de servicios.

Hoy la realidad es otra, pero si el juicio de los fondos buitres en EEUU contra YPF prospera por hacerse del control del "51%" de la compañía, quizás ese acuerdo comercial cambie y ya no sea YPF y sea otra refinería o no.

Saludos !!!

https://www.aca.org.ar/prensa/6_030622.pdf
mweper (2025-09-01 14:16:22+00:00): Tengo conocimientos sobre el tema de Gulf y @muralito que estuvo editando al respecto, también conozco el ACA.
Mi consulta era basado en el "operator" y en este en particular dice "Opessa ACA Oroño".

Entonces, para diferenciar las sucursales de las otras, no debería ser algo como:
name=ACA Oroño
operator=Opessa
full_name=Automóvil Club Argentino Bulevar Oroño
branch=Bulevar Oroño Rosario

Solo pregunto para mejorarlo, si puede ser el caso.
serock (2025-09-01 14:50:35+00:00): Hola mweper, para mi en el nombre "debería" ir el numero de la sucursal ej: ACA sucursal Nº 61 o  ACA Nº 61, que es lo mas lógico que poner junto al nombre, la cuidad o la calle o la refinería.
Yo de algunas pocas tengo el dato de la sucursal, pero de la mayoría no.
mweper (2025-09-01 15:18:16+00:00): Me gusta. Que tal "YPF ACA [Numero]", p.e. 
YPF ACA 15, YPF ACA 11, etc.
serock (2025-09-01 17:30:58+00:00): Si esta bien, seria mucho poner "YPF ACA Suc. 11" o "YPF ACA Filial 11" ?
mweper (2025-08-31 21:44:21+00:00): ¿Por qué "ACA" y no "YPF" ?
serock (2025-09-01 01:40:40+00:00): Hola mweper, el nombre de la estación de servicio es "ACA", independientemente de la marcar de combustible que venda, pasa algo parecido con "Gulf", los combustible son de "YPF", la diferencia es que uno esta todo unificado y el otro no.

Esto es algo que se hablo (note=Por favor, no agregar la marca de la estación en name=*, a menos que esté exactamente explícito, eso va en brand=*) y al final se separo una cosa de la otra, y es por eso que varias estaciones tienen en name: El Cruce, La Curva, La Rotonda, etc. independiente del "brand".

Lo mismo pasa con los que ponen en "name": EG3, PDV Sur, Esso, Oil, Dapsa, Isaura, Astra, San Lorenzo, Repsol, Petrobras, Rhasa, Texaco, Sol, etc., ya desaparecieron, pero en "brand" (cuando en realidad son "brand=Bandera Blanca") ponen lo mismo que en "name".

Si ud. cree que no corresponde o esta mal, siéntase libre de modificarlo o borrarlo, no hay problema de mi parte.

Saludos !!!
felipeeugenio (2025-08-31 22:51:40+00:00): Hola. Intentaste hacer una ciclovía?
Esa no es la manera, por favor revisar la wiki u otras ciclovías en Chile (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dcycleway). De esta manera se pueden generar conflictos. Mientras tanto voy a borrarlos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171249751
felipeeugenio (2025-09-01 12:31:16+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle


ahí puedes ver todas las combinaciones posibles.
Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171249751
eggie (2025-08-31 05:12:55+00:00): Top!
rempshaener (2025-08-31 20:42:04+00:00): Hallo,
dein Changeset-Kommentar „Hydrantennetz“ passt nicht nicht zu deinem Tagging.
Falls das hier https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=763164505313543&focus=photo&x=0.23023429043072485&y=0.5314152248004418&zoom=1.389261744966443&lat=52.5800122&lng=12.7322465&z=17 ein Löschwasserbrunnen mit Elektropumpe ist, wird der wie folgt getaggt:

emergency=fire_hydrant
fire_hydrant:type=pipe
fire_hydrant:pressure=yes
water_source=groundwater
couplings=1
couplings:diameters=A

Viele Grüße
Duckner (2025-08-31 00:49:57+00:00): Also removed a service road and put a parking lot in its place, and marked a pipeline as above ground
ilias_ (2025-08-31 23:00:18+00:00): Bonjour, pourquoi enlever name:ar et name:fr ? Ils sont tout à fait corrects.
Youssef Essabih (2025-08-31 23:53:22+00:00): Oui il est correcte
ilias_ (2025-09-01 00:17:18+00:00): Pas besoin de les enlever alors ! Je les ai remis.
Youssef Essabih (2025-09-01 00:20:20+00:00): Oui merci
ilias_ (2025-09-01 00:23:09+00:00): Pas de soucis
user_5359 (2025-08-31 07:28:49+00:00): Welcome back to OSM! Please don't add any private nummeration like Farmland 1, Farmland 2. Also we need no stadard names like Tree / Trees.
Kovoschiz (2025-08-31 06:21:14+00:00): 1. Please don't make signatures in your upload comment. It should summarize what you have done.
2. Please don't add private use data to a public map. This is vandalism.
user_5359 (2025-08-31 07:22:45+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Your business isn't a street. Reverted by https://www.osm.org/changeset/171255316
Udarian (2025-08-31 12:57:32+00:00): this was previously placed in a building and now is not, and I doubt that a bar (which is what this is tagged as) would not be in a building. I am also pretty sure that the buildings in this area are residential from Bing streetside, there are some retail/commercial looking buildings in the area but this object would need to be moved to be in those. 
So the question becomes, is this bar real and if it is were is it actually located.

happy mapping,
Udar
Udarian (2025-10-02 16:45:39+00:00): please respond
Udarian (2025-10-06 20:05:51+00:00): please respond
nona mostafa (2025-09-02 13:40:42+00:00): Hi ilias_,
Thank you for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
I noticed that you've changed the classification of some streets to secondary
For example:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/36363336
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/202733818
I noticed that you've changed the classification of some streets to tertiary
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1336816702
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1336816703
I believe it might be better to revert to the previous classification,
as the current classification may not fully match its actual function. Could you please review these changes and, if necessary, revert them?
Thank you again for your efforts and for helping to improve the map!
Best regards,
nona mostafa
ilias_ (2025-09-02 13:45:19+00:00): Hi nona mostafa,

How can you know it's "doesn't match its actual function"? I drive there. Both roads are heavily used. Now that I think about it, maybe they both should be secondary, even Rue Bachir Laalej.
nona mostafa (2025-09-03 12:25:32+00:00): Hi ilias_,
Thank you for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
I agree with you that there might those two roads might be of the same importance, but there is a break in the secondary network. In my opinion, we can convert those ways: "way 421569484, way 202733843, way 1113194707, way 422867218, way 184134306" to continue the secondary network, or revert those ways: "way 1336816702, way 1336816703, way 36363336, way 202733818" as they were. Please share your opinion with me
Thank you again for your efforts and for helping to improve the map!
Best regards,
nona mostafa
ilias_ (2025-09-04 21:26:28+00:00): You're right, they should be secondary as all of them are heavily used
nona mostafa (2025-09-07 13:36:13+00:00): Hi ilias_,
Thank you for responding to us quickly, and I am happy to connect with you
Thanks again.
Regards,
nona mostafa
TheLNL (2025-09-06 08:12:12+00:00): Was this mapped using google maps as a reference or was this mapped through in-person-observation and the link just to show that the place exists ?

Kindly note that the place may have to be deleted if there is no response
TheLNL (2025-09-06 08:14:35+00:00): **Talking about the link in the note you left before adding this place
Inspiring Dude (2025-09-06 08:53:37+00:00): Hee is the refrence profile of gmb please check. https://share.google/UPsjkbWzebK9XI4jw
TheLNL (2025-09-06 15:00:56+00:00): What I am asking is whether you used gmaps for making this edit. As copying gmaps data breaks copyright law if you did so the edit may have to be reverted.

If you instead made the edit based on what you have observed in real life the place may be kept

Since you added the restaurant in between the road and the building and not on the building itself it feels like the location data is copied from gmaps.

Is this the case ?
i2004 (2025-08-31 19:11:55+00:00): mañana empieza la 197
AgusQui (2025-08-31 19:14:49+00:00): Si, mas tarde hago los cambios
mueschel (2025-09-05 10:16:20+00:00): Hi,
you added many 
"maxspeed:type:AU = urban" tags.
The 'AU' should be part of the value:

maxspeed:type = AU:urban

Could you change that?
bob3bob3 (2025-09-07 17:35:21+00:00): Going to take a while, will try to enlist some help from other AU mappers with change/scripting support.

Tnx for the info
mueschel (2025-09-07 17:42:02+00:00): If you like to have an automated change for these 210 urban/rural tags, that's not a big deal. I could do that.

There's just this way with another mistake:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/694205334
bob3bob3 (2025-09-08 10:12:28+00:00): They have all been fixed by one of my mapping colleagues. 

I think I got confused by the Australian Guidelines wiki using "AU" as part of a post office key (post_office:type:AU=*), but as a value in maxspeed:type

Tnx for your help
Hufkratzer (2025-08-31 19:46:54+00:00): Hi,
I don't know what https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/886411212 ("Pacuan Kuda Dg Tata (YOSS)") exacly is, but it seems to have to do with horse racing. In this case tag leisure=horse_riding is not appropriate, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a#Racecourse_(horse_racing)
rempshaener (2025-08-31 08:51:11+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.

Du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Das sieht gut aus!
Schön wäre z. B. noch die Ergänzung von Nennweiten. Sofern es sich um einen Württemberger Schachthydranten handelt, wäre die Ergänzung von fire hydrant:style=wsh sinnvoll.

Vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag und weiterhin viel Spaß beim Mappen.
Viele Grüße
rempshaener (2025-08-31 08:52:24+00:00): Hallo,
die Nennweite (hier: 160) gehört in das Feld fire_hydrant:diameter
Viele Grüße
wambag (2025-08-31 06:30:00+00:00): Issues with this road:
1) It was supposed to be changed from FL 9B to I 795, but I cannot find any evidence online that it officially has been changed.
2) Even so, it has been changed in OSM, but only partially; some sections still say 9B.
3) It is "I 795", not "I-795" with a hyphen.
I don't want to go through the process of correcting it until I am sure if it has been officially made I 795 or not.
Roydon Olive (2025-09-01 09:35:50+00:00): bruce oake is on the aerial images now, so i did an update of that area. take a look and see if there is anything else to improve
4r65th6 (2025-08-31 18:07:17+00:00): Haha je venais sur osm aujourd'hui pour ajouter ça, trop rapide! Merci!
❤️‍🔥 (2025-08-31 22:45:52+00:00): yes, 3 lanes in total. That would be:

lanes=3
lanes:forward=2
lanes:backward=1

turn:lanes:forward=left|through;right


the forward/backward depends on the direction of the line, which you can determine based on these subtle arrows which appear when you select a line: https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/3d3d60e1-7e12-4adb-89ae-a2c08481e004
LT777 (2025-09-01 09:12:20+00:00): Brilliant. Thanks for that. I’ve amended accordingly.
Jacksonville (2025-08-31 17:05:04+00:00): Brother can you please have the decency to leave comments before making edits? I have done this several times, and you have not responded. This is not a one-way street. Let's discuss.

The entire area is known as Kartarpur, it is a town. It doesn't matter whether the centre is a Gurudwara or not. Kartarpur is an official locality, and so there needs to be a town marker. It is a town on local maps, and on other online maps, and government maps. I am re-adding it. Do not remove it. This might be a simple change for you, but it affects other maps as well, so discuss this.

2. What requirements? It is a road that connects two major towns - Kartarpur and Dera Baba Nanak. That's like saying the G.T Road is a service road.

Let's be logical about this.
Jacksonville (2025-08-31 17:11:04+00:00): The name of the road is literally "شاہراہِ گرو نانک" / "Guru Nanak Highway"- it cannot be a service road in any sense.
RLakhani (2025-08-31 21:22:18+00:00): What you were saying is not correct. This is not a town. A town is defined by OSM as “ An important urban centre, between a village and a city in size.” There is no village or town called kartarpur - it is a gurdwara complex, that’s all. It is not a town on local maps either. There is a Wikipedia article that incorrectly calls it a town which is wheee the confusion may come from, but you can use satellite imagery and see clearly that the gurdwara is not a town. It is fact near villages that have a totally different name.

It is not listed as a town on the Narowal district website https://narowal.punjab.gov.pk/. What *official* map are you looking at?

2) “Kartapur Corridor” does *not* connect two major towns. It connects a gurdwara with a pilgrim reception centre on the Indian side. That’s all. No one is allowed to travel from India to Narowal, or Narowal to anyplace in India using this road. That is why it is not a highway. It only connects a temple with a reception centre, and only special carts can use this road. No other traffic is allowed whatsoever.

GT road east of Lahore is arguably no longer functions as a trunk road as it does not functionally connects Amritsar and Lahore anymore. Indian cars cannot enter Pakistan and vice versa. Until 2019 only
Trucks could cross at the integrated border post. Only foot traffic can now cross the border. 

The maps incorrectly depict roads and crossing which do not exist. The only road connecting both Punjabs is at Wagah. Nowhere else. That is why there are no other cross border highways. We have to depict reality.
RLakhani (2025-09-01 09:12:52+00:00): BTW you entered the population of Kartarpur as 1537 (which is too small to be a town btw). This is *not* that village. That kartarpur is located to the southwest of Zafarwal near the villages of Haibat Pura and Rajian. I’m guessing you saw that population on the census. With each village there is a code that is given with each villages number similar to nearby villages. Kartar Pur’s code is 233, haibat pur is 236 and Rajo Maral is 234 indicating this is a cluster of villages, which shows that Kartarpur is *not* the gurdwara area, it is an entirely different village.
Jacksonville (2025-09-01 12:27:49+00:00): One, the population is from 2017 and if I remember exactly was under the Narowal district. I could be wrong, but that doesn't really change the situation.  The Gurudwara and the bazaar and housing complex are all in a town called Kartarpur. It's nonsensical to not have a town node here. 

Again, you need to think of the consequences of removing the node, the area becomes unsearchable, because while you can search Kartarpur and it might redirect you with the Gurudwara - the Gurudwara is a POI, not an area. 

Wikipedia and Wikidata also have articles on it, so I don't really see what standing you have here.
Jacksonville (2025-09-01 12:34:12+00:00): The Kartarpur Corridor DOES connect the two towns. It does not matter who is allowed to travel or not, the can be specificed in the notes or the road access can be specificed.

One example being the Russo-Ukraine border highways - which are obviously defunct and crossings no longer take place, however they are still classified as Grand Trunk Roads. This, albeit, is not a grand trunk road, it is a primary/secondary road. 

Like I said - it is called "Guru Nanak Highway" for a reason. I see that you've also changed the road classification on the Indian side - which again, I have no idea why because it only seems to be of your opinon.
Jacksonville (2025-09-01 12:37:05+00:00): And it is certainly not just a service road. Pakistanis have been alllowed to go to the border and back. Pedestrians have been to walk from the border to the complex and back.