piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2025-08-10 12:24:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 170243072 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible source - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18555].
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-05-27 03:17:25+00:00): Reverted SEO spam changeset deleting existing monument and replacing with SEO POI with SEO spam tags

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183235599
Lezurex (2025-08-05 10:37:53+00:00): Warum?
Makeena (2025-08-05 12:51:24+00:00): Ich hab nur gesehen, dass das vorübergehende Tagging als disused nicht konsistent war und hier noch ein Name angezeigt worden ist. Eigentlich nicht so wichtig.
Udarian (2025-08-05 12:10:11+00:00): how do you add so meany translations in one go; do you really know over 50 languages from very different parts of the world.
dadavid (2025-08-05 11:28:16+00:00): Hi, 

bist du sicher dass das hier ein Wasserwerk ist? Siehe auch Definition im Wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:man%20made=water%20works?uselang=de

Zumindest auf dem Satellitenbild sieht es so aus, als würde man_made=reservoir_covered hier deutlich besser passen

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:man_made%3Dreservoir_covered

Außerdem wäre es toll, wenn die Änderunsbeschreibungen eintragen könntest, statt nur einen Punkt einzugeben, das ist wenig hilfreich. 

Viele Grüße

David
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2025-08-05 14:04:01+00:00): Değişiklik açıklamasına yazdığınız "Gereği yapıldı" ifadeniz ile neyi kastettiğiniz anlaşılmıyor. Lütfen daha anlaşılır değişiklik açıklamaları yazınız. 
Bkz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Marek_P (2025-08-15 15:47:03+00:00): W środę 13 sierpnia remont dotyczył odcinka mniej więcej między posesjami 219 i zakładami mięsnymi, ale jest tam przejazd wahadłowy, choć  formalnie tylko dla miejscowych. Z jakiego powodu jako "w remoncie" oznaczono aż tak długi odcinek?
rsoltys (2025-08-15 17:38:33+00:00): Odpowiedź jest bardzo prosta. Droga w czasie remontu jest TYLKO dla mieszkańców, a DW482 to bardzo ruchliwa trasa i cześć kierowców korzysta z map  do nawigacji opartych Openstreetmap.  Poza tym znaki na skrzyżówani  z DK74 mówią jasno...objazd do Sokolnik przez Wieruszów.
Marek_P (2025-08-15 17:55:47+00:00): Do oznaczania drogi tylko dla mieszkańców służą inne tagi, a nie oznaczanie remontu odcinka, który w remoncie nie jest. Faktyczny remont dotyczy dużo krótszego odcinka i jego prawidłowe oznaczenie da dla nawigacji ten sam efekt, a nie uczyni jednocześnie ślepym dojazdu do posesji we wsi.
!i! (2025-08-11 17:32:03+00:00): Hi, find ich super, dass du den Spielplatz hier konkretisierst :-) Wenn du magst, es gibt auch ein Schema, wo man die Geräte klassifiziert, so dass man da nicht den Namen dran schreiben muss: <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:playground>  
Dann kann das auch einheitlich ausgewertet werden und z.B. ein passendes Symbol erscheint 🙂
agilenewt21 (2025-08-05 10:42:14+00:00): Extent of change is Crowthorns.  Picked sidewalk:left=no on section where the footway is completely separated by hedge - if someone were to get on this footway they couldn't cross to Staveley Way for example.
gnesss (2025-08-07 13:46:42+00:00): Nice. There should be _some_ mapillary imagery around there, but it’s a few years old now.
domi_nick (2025-08-11 07:39:49+00:00): Dlaczego wandalizmu?
grzegorz75jan (2025-09-13 22:10:57+00:00): Niesamowicie (nie)treściwy opis zmiany 
"wycofanie wandalizmu"
Na czym polegał ten wandalizm, czego dotyczył ???

Sensowniejszy opis ułatwił by innym bytowanie.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian

https://youtu.be/xBMIoypkdI4?list=PLTgtPjgzssHzsgAqYbi2QfRoRk1S9ioX5&t=2596
grzegorz75jan (2025-08-05 11:33:52+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian

https://youtu.be/xBMIoypkdI4?list=PLTgtPjgzssHzsgAqYbi2QfRoRk1S9ioX5&t=2596
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169999427
custodiankeyy (2025-08-05 19:45:10+00:00): Diğer apartmanları neden sildiniz?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1415418790
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1415418791
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1415418792
HugoC01 (2025-08-05 11:22:20+00:00): 170000000!
Me: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170000002
codll (2025-08-05 12:37:12+00:00): big number
Fred1717 (2025-08-05 14:36:41+00:00): Fantastic 😃
DawsZed (2025-08-06 06:49:19+00:00): Congrats on 170,000,000! 🎉
𝙢𝙖𝙧𝙖𝙯𝙯𝙚𝙧 ദ്ദി ᗜˬᗜ✧ (2025-08-15 20:40:44+00:00): Congrats :)
HugoC01 (2025-08-05 11:14:46+00:00): 170000000 +2
ReScQ (2025-08-05 13:26:57+00:00): You used some height and some building:level tags. I think you just wanted to use height, because the München Messe should not have 15 floors.
LonelyHunter (2025-08-06 07:20:58+00:00): Thank you! You are right! I want 15 Meters - 15 floors miss klick. I update buildings according Bing streetside
gskoljarev (2025-08-05 11:37:30+00:00): To further expand, on the edited parts of these streets, they are narrowed in a way only a pedestrian, a bicycle or a motorcycle can pass, but nothing on four wheels. Hence the edits.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-08-06 06:09:50+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18554
wildmaps (2025-09-09 00:02:49+00:00): Hallo veredicta,

vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag und deine Änderung!
Ich habe deinen Changeset überprüft:
osm.org/changeset/170001943

Dabei habe ich festgestellt, dass du access=no und weitere Zugangsbeschränkungen eingetragen hast, die so vermutlich nicht korrekt sind.

Solche Zugangsbeschränkungen sollten nur eingetragen werden, wenn vor Ort ein entsprechendes Schild steht – z. B. ein Fahrradverbot → bicycle=no.
access=no bedeutet, dass ein Objekt für die Öffentlichkeit nicht zugänglich oder seine Benutzung verboten ist. Dadurch wäre kein Routing mehr möglich. Siehe auch das Wiki:
osm.wiki/DE:Tag:access%3Dno

Außerdem hast du den Namen „Verbindungsweg 14 zu 15“ eingetragen, der so nicht korrekt ist. Ich habe diesen Eintrag in description:de verschoben. Als name sollte nur der tatsächliche Name des Weges eingetragen werden.

Falls du Fragen hast oder Tipps brauchst, kannst du dich gerne bei mir melden oder in der Telegram-Gruppe der italienischen oder deutschen OSM-Community nachfragen:
https://t.me/OpenStreetMapItalia
https://t.me/OSM_de

Liebe Grüße
Michael
veredicta (2025-09-09 06:34:12+00:00): Hallo,  herzlichen Dank. Das access=no war nicht bewusst. Wurde es nun durch Sie geändert? Das wäre hervorragend.  Noch sehe ich die Bezeichnung Verbindungsweg 14 zu 15.

Beste Grüße 
veredicta
wildmaps (2025-09-09 09:36:18+00:00): Hallo, ja ich habe alles richtiggestellt. Wenn Sie die Änderung nicht sehen genügt es den cache zu leeren oder auf Windows Strg + R zu drücken.
Vg
Michaeö
buy_osmand (2025-08-05 12:06:31+00:00): Thank you for your highly valuable ground survey upload❗❕ This changeset has been marked as good 😳👍
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170002191
dzamper (2025-08-05 13:27:50+00:00): This is not true (unless it's some temporary change)
The left lane (with embedded tram tracks) is accessible for all vehicles and is marked as lane for vehicles going straight on
dzamper (2025-08-06 07:50:34+00:00): I guess it could've been meant to refer to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/363158033 instead?
rle32795 (2025-08-05 11:54:14+00:00): (or actually physically_present tag)
dadavid (2025-08-06 11:58:07+00:00): surely the heritage:website tag should be deleted too, right? 

-david
tagishsimon (2025-08-06 13:53:13+00:00): Correct; my bad. Thanks.
hatul (2025-08-06 06:01:57+00:00): תודה על התוספות.
עם יש גדר שחוסמת כדאי להוסיף access=no גם אם אפשר לטפס עליה.
kubzon7 (2025-08-07 10:09:50+00:00): Czy na pewno stworzenie nieistniejącego skrzyżowania na al. Lecha Kaczyńskiego było celowe? (53.113148/18.058144)
kubzon7 (2025-08-12 16:31:54+00:00): Wycofane w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170350883, temat został poruszony w uwadze https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4896790
NorthCrab_upload (2025-08-05 12:11:19+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13049909216

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Szymson (2025-08-05 12:43:58+00:00): Nie mapujemy pod render. To że czegoś nie widać to nie znaczy ze wyszukiwarka tego nie znajdzie. Ma być zgodnie z rzeczywistością a nie żeby wyglądało to "ładnie" na mapie
Wise_Turtle (2025-08-05 12:33:30+00:00): Просьба не вносить вымышленных названий и не создавать мифы на пустом месте. Просто большой камень там лежит, не памятник никакой и никакое не место силы там как в яндексе расписали идолопоклонники.
user_5359 (2025-08-05 13:50:31+00:00): Welcome to OSM! If you want add your business please add a node with address and business information. I revert your try.
user_5359 (2025-08-07 18:31:51+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/13049984884. What is the mean of the tag 0 = 75
Amul (2025-08-08 05:43:07+00:00): It was meant to be “ref”. I fixed it. Thanks for pointing that out
custodiankeyy (2025-08-05 19:29:19+00:00): Merhaba, yollar 1 gidiş 1 geliş olarak 2 şerit mi yoksa direkt olarak tek şerit mi?
user_5359 (2025-08-07 18:33:19+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/relation/1853631. What is the mean of the tag 1908 = 1908?
user_22463405 (2025-08-05 13:57:21+00:00): Hi, the links that you changed to a trunk road are part of a motorway interchange, a project for adding new link is under construction, and The Moroccan Motorway Company is supervising the works, so these links are a motorway link.
nona mostafa (2025-08-07 11:08:21+00:00): Hallo Amineee__,
Thank you for sharing the information, and I am happy to communicate with you.
I’d like to clarify that the classification has been changed from motorway_link to trunk
Ex:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1420187696
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1413024259
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1420187697
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1383764990
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1413024259
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1383764982
This adjustment reflects its current role as a road extension.
EX:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1383764981
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1383764989
 In the future, once the road network is fully operational, we will convert it into links.
Thank you for your contribution to OSM.
Best regards,
nona mostafa
silversurfer83 (2025-08-05 16:36:43+00:00): Moin Yogibär :)

ich hätte da nen Hinweis zum Thema Getrennt Gemappte Bürgersteige:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Gehsteig#Gehsteig_als_eigenst%C3%A4ndige_Linie

Wenn du sie als eigenen way erfasst, bitte auch an Übergänge denken. Ampeln und so. 

bei Fragen immer raus damit
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170005055
SpinOff (2025-08-11 17:23:05+00:00): Hej. Ta droga jest używana jeszcze do czegoś innego niż dojazd do pól? highway=track zdawało się tutaj pasować
AndyB_66 (2025-10-20 16:17:02+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
yelisey90 (2026-01-24 15:48:35+00:00): reverted: mass changes using not on-the-ground checking, but some undetermined sources, possibly simply aerial imagery; including incorrect surface tagging (asphalt instead of unpaved or sett), incorrect addresses to buildings etc.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177651581
SpinOff (2025-08-19 21:57:26+00:00): What's the source of this name? I cannot find anything on the Internet with that name.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-24 17:48:10+00:00): reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410  and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969  remain not answered

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173729674
StC (2025-08-06 12:02:20+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changeset semble avoir brisé en deux endroits la continuité du Chemin des Douaniers qui passe par là. Je vais essayer de réparer.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-03 12:43:52+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13050115605/history has shop = colorificio that was added in this edit
Is it paint shop by any chance? Then shop=paint would be better, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=paint
yelisey90 (2025-08-22 14:02:27+00:00): properly fixed in this edit: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170833960
MountWutai (2025-08-25 21:41:45+00:00): Hi yelisey90,
Thank you for taking a look at this edit, I will defer to your knowledge here.
MapMenMan (2025-08-06 18:32:45+00:00): I have also reverted the changes to the names of the 3 apartment buildings of Idaville to maintain consistancy with other area named in a similar way, such as the neighbouring Crawford Mews
eultra (2025-08-06 13:51:54+00:00): Si access est inderdit, ne delete pas le chemin, utilise les tags correctement: osm.wiki/FR:Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F
eultra (2025-08-06 13:52:18+00:00): Lien correctement: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F
ordinatous (2025-09-27 05:35:35+00:00): Bonjour Eultra , j'ai vu ton message qu'aujourd'hui, effectivement j'ai appris qu'il ne fallait pas supprimer mais utiliser le tag approprié pour invisibiliser une trace.
A bientot.
marc__marc (2026-02-20 17:11:12+00:00): Bonjour,
cela dépend de la réalité du terrain
s'il y a un sentier interdit, c'est highway=path access=no
s'il n'y a plus de sentier (par ex ceux que l'opérateur a supprimé en 2025 en replantant à cet endroit) alors un cycle de vie a tout son sens
Cordialement,
Marc
marc__marc (2026-02-20 17:12:11+00:00): ceci dit, le pdf mis en lien ne parle pas des sentiers, seulement du bivouac et des lacs
et pour les textes de lois, il y a le tag source_ref (tres mal nomé, confusion avec la clef ref)
eggie (2025-08-05 14:23:23+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-08-05 14:33:46+00:00): Dag DS.. De naam van het water staat in principe op de vaarweg... Dus niet op het vlak. Bovendien is dit niet de Wijnhaven. Dat is maar een gedeelte. 
Ik zal de naam weer verwijderen.

Mapse
eggie
eggie (2025-08-05 14:41:34+00:00): Alle begin is moeilijk. Niet iets beschrijven onder de key name=  Hondenuitlaatgebied Tijdelijk... Ik heb het aangepast naar description=
MapMenMan (2025-08-06 18:18:55+00:00): I have reverted these changes. The amenity=monastery tag is for the area of a monastery's grounds; not the main building which you removed the building=yes tag from. The monastery's name and denomination is also already included on the larger amenity=monastery area in line with other uses of religious area tags
ToniE (2025-08-05 15:42:35+00:00): Servus,

vermutlich ein Versehen:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/720628774 fehlt nun  bicycle=designated.

Gruß
Toni
Udarian (2025-08-05 14:12:18+00:00): I do not see the ALPR on the streetside imagery so I was wondering what your source is for this. Also generally I don't think that these should be placed as a vertex in the middle of a road.
InfosReseaux (2025-08-28 16:02:44+00:00): Hello German C,

i'm currently contributing on Colombia power grid from Europe with ESRI World imagery wich sometimes lack some accuracy
I saw the particular source you mentioned in your changeset here but don't manage to access anything.
Do you have any hint about the license of this layer and how we could use it please?

Best regards
German C (2025-08-28 16:33:11+00:00): Hi, this layer only show that village Palmas del Guayabito (buildings and streets) outside the village in the layer the resolution is worse and older that bing maps.

It is a bit of a lucky that the electricity tower is shown because there are houses in the village before and after the tower.

In Colombia each department (Santander, Boyaca, Cundinamarca, etc) have different electrical power enterprises that rule entire deparment, each enterprise have diferent rules about how to manage licences that show entire and detailed tower by tower specification, in Santander is ESSA, in Cundimarca is ENEL, in Boyaca is EBSA (total 32 enterprises).

This particular layer only have buildings and streets you can get details and read carefully the part "Colombian Citizens" here: https://colombia-en-mapas.gitbook.io/colombia-en-mapas/soporte-y-faq/preguntas-frecuentes-faq
InfosReseaux (2025-08-29 15:56:22+00:00): Hello and thank you for your answer, I didn't took time to look at your profile and I found the URL to use for this area.

But I'm affraid that it could be filtered outside of Colombia: I'm getting timeout from mapas2.igac.gov.co, still today.

You made a great work of documentation on wiki about Colombia and it's nice to read, thank you.

Regarding power comanies, we are not set to assign accurately operators for now, we only seek for missing power lines and substations on well known aerial imagery. I will took time to write a little on the community forum about what we found so far.

All the best !
user_5359 (2025-08-05 16:48:56+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please check the name of your farmlands for typos (field instead of feild).
user_5359 (2025-08-05 16:47:16+00:00): Welocme to OSM! Your business is not a street crossing!
Jordi MF (2025-08-05 17:02:13+00:00): Hola diec,

¿Estás seguro que en estas calles cualquier persona puede circular con su vehículo y que, por lo tanto, no son "private"? Lo digo porque si en la puerta hay alguna indicación de q solamente los vecinos pueden circular (o andar), creo que debería de mantenerse la etiqueta access=private o motor_vehicle=private. Así, aunque es poco probable, los ruteadores no permitirán que calcular una ruta para cualquier vehículo entre en estas calles.

Saludos y suerte con el buen trabajo que está realizando por la zona!
diec_import-catastro-Malaga (2025-08-05 17:31:18+00:00): Hola.  
He revisado el  change set, y efectivamente, en él hay calles públicas y vías privadas.  En las vías privadas, uso las étiquetas "highway=service" y "service=parking_aisle".  En todos los casos, puesto que es una vía privada con una puerta de entrada, en el nodo de entrada uso "barrier=gate" y "motor_vehicle=private".  Por tanto, el router tiene que pasar por un node motor_vehicle=private.  

Yo asumo que el router lo respeta, el node "barrier" y no debe user la ruta.  

En conclusión:
a) la vía highway=service NO tiene la etiqueta "private"
b) la vía comienza con un node barrier motor_vehicle=private.
Yo creo que es correcto.  
Además, uso "Organic Maps" para el rutado en mis zonas y todavía no he visto una entrada por "vía privada"

Tu observación es correcta para la "vías privadas " SIN nodo de acceso "barrier".  En este caso, SI que debo usar "access=private"

¿ Me equivoco en mi argumentación ?


Un saludo .

Diego
Jordi MF (2025-08-05 22:36:13+00:00): No había visto que el nodo de entrada tenía la prohibición de acceso. A mi también me gusta añadir la prohibición en toda la calle o vía, pero tal y como lo has hecho debería de ser completamente funcional, así que me parece bien.

Sobre "parking_aisle", los ejemplos que da la wiki no parecen coincidir con ese tipo de vías. Yo diría que ese etiquetado está pensado para las típicas calles de aparcamiento de los centros comerciales, supermercados, grandes aparcamientos... (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Dparking_aisle). Yo hubiese mapeado esas calles como simples "service" que dan acceso a propiedades privadas. Pero bueno, supongo que la línea no s del todo clara, así que tampoco pondré muchas objeciones.

Un saludo,

Jordi
user_5359 (2025-08-05 16:44:02+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dsocial_facility for a better description
eggie (2025-08-05 14:30:10+00:00): Dag DS  .. area=yes heb ik verwijderd, Dat was ooit een manier om een heg als vlak te krijgen, maar dat werkt inmiddels niet meer. Helaas wordt shrubbery nog steeds niet gerenderd op de standaardkaart.

Mapse
eggie
セコイア (2025-08-19 07:20:49+00:00): Please be careful in your editing and try to use newer imagery.

This change reintroduces a road that was demolished and had already been removed from OSM once.
Przemek_Bo (2025-08-19 15:03:52+00:00): Hi セコイア, Thank you for your feedback and for making the corrections. At this location I relied on Japan GSI ortho Imagery and treated it as the freshest source, which turned out to not be the case. Thank you for making me aware of this. I’ve also added the missing buildings in this area to prevent other mappers to potentially make the same mistake.
セコイア (2025-08-19 15:07:19+00:00): Thank you for your many edits in this area!
danieldegroot2 (2025-08-07 11:23:45+00:00): Hey Victor,

Did you check the plausibility of this archaeological site with other sources?

It does look circular at first (on Bing).
(ie. think of a large enclosure)
Zooming in it looks fairly regular, octagonal (or even square) in shape.
(ie. still enclosure, or moat)
East edge is not visible, but that is okay.
The west edge seems more convincingly circular when viewed in Esri Clarity, but only as thin edge.
First edition maps have a regular boundary along the west edge.
Looking at aerial imagery the area is wet, there is some streams and tracks, no clear ditch.
https://livingatlas.arcgis.com/wayback/#active=15212&mapCenter=-8.43883%2C52.42166%2C18&mode=explore
It might include (part of) a field system (LI040-113----), though it is unclear to where it extends. Personally I only see the linear strip along the boundary. I doubt it is (nearly) circular, though there exist examples of those around enclosures.

If you think there is a possible archaeological site, you can mark it with 'maybe' lifecycle prefix and add a 'note' tag to describe what you think it might be and whether it has been reported/confirmed by NMS (which can be done using their monument report form via email).

Regards,

Daniel
danieldegroot2 (2025-08-07 11:29:37+00:00): If it is an enclosure, the eastern edge might be visible on the 2001-2005 photo on HEV. It seems to combine with the ditch for the west/left barrow (LI040-116----). There might be an entrance facing east.
(anyhow, for OSM we can not use this photo, of course)
VictorIE (2025-08-07 14:45:00+00:00): Hi,

It seems to be LI040-113----

How do I tag that?
danieldegroot2 (2025-08-07 17:07:44+00:00): Suggested tags

historic=archaeological_site
archaeological_site=field_system
heritage=2
heritage:operator=IE:smr
ref:IE:smr=LI040-113----
source=Esri World Imagery Wayback 2017-10-04 (DigitalGlobe WV02 2014-03-11)

Map as area. Use on the whole field(s), or rough shape, where you are able to see the (here: rectangular) cropmarks indicating the field system.
A67-A67 (2025-08-05 17:50:47+00:00): This is incorrect. A link road should have the highest category before _link. So a motorway-secondary-link is highway=motorway_link.

I've restored the tagging.
queenofthenightosphere (2025-08-05 23:02:00+00:00): I think it should be both in this case. They specifically mention the address to use to contact them on their website. Addr is used for the physical location, contact is for mailing. I'm aware that they're both the same, but it's important specificity, imo.
user_5359 (2025-08-06 04:49:30+00:00): There is indeed a distinction between a physical address and a contact address. However, mentioning both only makes sense if they are different.

 Firstly, the addresses (see https://www.osm.org/node/13048485380/history/5) were identical and the contact address is written as contact:street instead of contact:addr:street. (I am not explaining the other keys of an address).