piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
gscholz (2024-02-25 10:14:56+00:00): Hi ArtzaiPY,
this changeset has destroyed the boundary relation of Pilar:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-58.30545&lat=-26.86699&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.58&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=147873613

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/346568635/history

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
andrewsh (2024-02-24 23:16:45+00:00): dank u :)
Lejun (2024-02-24 23:18:54+00:00): À noter que les URL étaient encore valides il y a quelques semaines. Tout a sauté à la sortie du nouveau site. À voir si ça revient.
gurglypipe (2024-02-27 10:23:35+00:00): Please, split your changesets into smaller geographical areas when touching multiple unrelated objects. This changeset spans 5 counties.

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets for why this is helpful to others
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-03-31 22:36:37+00:00): Isn't the project canceled?
emersonveenstra (2024-03-01 13:47:06+00:00): Hi there,

Can you double check your edits on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/217570831? Looks like it's doing some weird stuff like crossing over another railway and a super sharp bend at the end. See visualization at https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/217570831
emersonveenstra (2024-03-22 13:09:34+00:00): fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149012980#map=15/43.2969/-116.0442
JAAS (2024-02-28 00:32:55+00:00): Mi muy estimado Guiso,

Esta es ya la segunda oportunidad que intento comunicarme con usted. No hace falta ignorarme. 

Por favor respóndame para evitar esta absurda guerra de ediciones con sus absurdas ediciones. Al día de hoy hasta me da la impresión que se entretiene cambiando mis ediciones, pero si considera que estoy equivocado, mejor contácteme antes de simplemente cambiarlas para que discutamos acerca del porqué las he hecho. 

Si acaso estoy en lo correcto, con gusto puedo apoyarle a hacer las cosas de mejor manera, con bases sólidas. Si es usted el que tiene la razón, estoy dispuesto a escucharle y aprender de sus conocimientos.

@DWG I have tried to contact this user, but he inisists on ignoring me and going behind me changing my edits in a questionable manner. Please help me to persuade this user to contact me before continuing on this unneeded "edit war" with him. Thank you.

Saludos cordiales,
JAAS
archie (2024-02-25 00:16:42+00:00): Tack!!
gscholz (2024-02-26 06:01:57+00:00): Hi Olayinka Omoboyede,
this changeset has created several errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting and displaced ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=7.41391&lat=10.53266&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=147874781

I have just reverte it to fix those issues. You can avoid uploading such errors by using JOSM  internal validator.

Kind regards
Guido
Olayinka Omoboyede (2024-02-26 20:11:17+00:00): Thank you sir
Filip009 (2024-04-11 08:19:44+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11538648833 Nie je Černobyľ s Ypsilonom?
macdale (2024-04-11 09:31:21+00:00): Urcite, dik za upozornenie.
Mahdi Nameghi (2024-02-25 07:55:57+00:00): شما تابلوی این رو دیدین؟
اینقدر درگیر القاب و حواشی هستید که شهید رو از نام حذف کردین!!!
ChehrehBargi (2024-02-25 13:36:48+00:00): سلام
حق با شماست
از قلم انداختم
:(
ChehrehBargi (2024-02-25 13:45:44+00:00): البته علت این بود که در تعدادی از ثبت‌ها نوشتار این عبارت غلط ثبت شده و در حال اصلاحش در همه جا بودم.
Mahdi Nameghi (2024-02-25 14:05:56+00:00): لطفاً ویرایش های کلی روی هر جایی اعمال نکنید
اسم باید منطبق بر تابلو باشه
اگه تابلو رو ندیدین چجوری این ادیت انجام شده!؟
ممنون میشم توجه کنید
ChehrehBargi (2024-02-26 17:04:32+00:00): منطبق بودن با تابلو رو قبول دارم و تابلو رو هم ندیدم. اما عبارتی رو از نو اضافه نکردم. عبارت سرلشگر که اشتباهه و اصلاح کردم. خودتونم جست و جو کنین میاد. و اینکه طبق قوانین نام کامل در name و نام کوتاه شده در short name میاد. البته عبارت تابلو اولویت بالاتری داره. باز هر طور که به نظرتون درسته و در شأن شهید هست ویرایش کنید.
با سپاس از توجهات شما
Vivek Dumre (2024-05-10 10:03:21+00:00): Thank you for mapping. The changeset comment and the mapping seems impressive. Keep mapping and contribute to open mapping. Happy mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147875572
RP-C1 (2024-03-11 18:52:13+00:00): Can we use Mahogany's developer lotworks map to update de roads?
https://hopewellmaps.lotworks.ca/maps/mahogany
Vivek Dumre (2024-05-10 10:01:44+00:00): Thank you for mapping. The changeset comment and the mapping seem impressive. Keep mapping and contribute to open mapping. Happy mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147875630
MxxCon (2024-02-28 00:52:05+00:00): What is this note about clearance on Riverside Drive street is for?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147875631
IraGersh (2024-02-28 03:31:07+00:00): I took a photo to remind me the tunnel was lit and then noticed the clearances on the photo.

The clearances differ by just two inches. I could go with maxheight on the lower.
MxxCon (2024-02-28 03:36:03+00:00): Ok but from what I see on satellite imagery Riverside Drive doesn't have any heights limitations, it's 138th st.
You can set maxheight:forward and maxheight:backward tags to indicate each side.
IraGersh (2024-02-28 04:59:44+00:00): That area is a bit strange. I'm told it was once two ways. Maybe 10 years ago? West 138 from Broadway west is one way and 12th avenue which begins where 138 ends is also one way. I'll add those tags and the photo.
MxxCon (2024-02-28 05:15:17+00:00): I don't think you are understanding what I'm talking about. You made change on this way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/800923648/
It's a road that runs ON TOP of the tunnel, yet you wrote it has height limit. That is NOT correct.
IraGersh (2024-02-28 23:12:17+00:00): If I wrote a note about a height limit on road over the tunnel, then I definitely screwed up.
felipeeugenio (2024-02-25 12:56:58+00:00): Hello. What is this?
felipeeugenio (2024-02-25 13:06:04+00:00): Sorry, nevermind
Ikuta (2024-05-15 23:48:16+00:00): 編集ありがとうございます！最近のChangesetには、多くのorphan nodesやタグのないウェイが含まれているようです。これはおそらくJOSMでの編集によるものます。JOSMでの提出前に警告がないか確認するか、あるいはより使いやすいiDエディターをお試しいただくことをお勧めします。
Rico557 (2024-05-15 10:49:42+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/580217328
Рэйкавыя партызанен?)))
4004 (2024-05-15 11:24:04+00:00): iD партызаны. И никто не заметил за 3 месяца…
Kovoschiz (2024-02-25 07:14:11+00:00): Reverted /changeset/147876834 Shatin mountains: continued unresponded misuse of `name=` . Needs further discussion.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147879549
Smoky_Jo (2024-02-25 05:35:28+00:00): Name is Shabuya, not Shanuya
rhtb0 (2024-02-25 06:29:51+00:00): Hello welcome to OpenStreetMap
Also, 'Korean House, Farmand' name is describe name.
Don't use name tag to describe things.
The name tag should be used for the common name of a feature. It should not describe or label the feature. For example, it is incorrect to use name=track on a track road through a forest. Instead it should have the feature tag highway=track. If the track has a common name (like a street name), it would have a name tag too. If not, then there should be no name tag.

You can find appropriate tags in the editors using their presets (in iD start typing after you add an object, in JOSM press F3) and by searching this wiki or Taginfo. If you cannot find matching tags, add description=* or note=* or ask the community.
rhtb0 (2024-02-25 06:30:29+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names
rhtb0 (2024-02-25 06:31:51+00:00): The names should be restricted to the name of the item in question only and should not include additional information not contained in the official name such as categories, types, descriptions, addresses, refs, or notes. 
Names are not for descriptions
Edit
For descriptions please use description=* not the name=*.

While it is welcome to tag building=house, it is wrong to add also name=house. Or name=Mosque to amenity=place_of_worship + religion=muslim. Validators may detect and propose to remove the most obvious and common incorrect descriptive names, but undetected ones also are incorrect. This is a form of tagging for the renderer.
rhtb0 (2024-02-25 06:32:21+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-03-05 01:05:49+00:00): Reviewed
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147878437
HAmap (2024-02-25 15:27:57+00:00): Hi WoSoe, was genau war der Fehler? Ich lerne gerne dazu
TonyS999 (2024-03-04 18:14:05+00:00): Hi
You have changed Preston Road, Standish - split the road to take into account the pedestrian crossing with an island.
When wil you be updating the 111, 362, 640 and 641  bus routes to suit.
Regards
Tony
Supaplex (2024-02-25 11:37:50+00:00): Already added
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/546761340#map=18/25.12756/121.47004
please add the name:en tag for the store
Kovoschiz (2024-02-25 12:22:42+00:00): Ok now you decide to remove things. Any more to say about your reasoning?
tastrax (2024-03-01 09:52:31+00:00): Dont forget the +61 and area codes on phone numbers :-)
Sam Wilson (2024-03-01 10:01:20+00:00): eek, sorry! thanks for fixing it. :)

I was trying to update OSM and order at the same time.
kjon (2024-02-25 14:13:11+00:00): Direkt neben deinem neuen Eintrag ist Kongfu Chilli bereits vorhanden, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/574773731 . Kannst Du deinen doppelten Eintrag bitte löschen bzw. neue Details dem bereits vorhandenen Eintrag hinzufügen?
Neosignal (2024-02-25 16:23:26+00:00): Tut mir Leid, jedoch ist dieser Spot in der letzten Organic Maps Version nicht ersichtlich. Daher habe ich diesen dort hinzugefügt. Wenn dieser auf der Karte doppelt ersichtlich sein sollte, lösche ich meinen Eintrag gern.
mcliquid (2024-02-25 08:58:03+00:00): Hallo, du hast den Hundskopftobelbach in Wangertobl umbenannt.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/463473079/history

Direkt darunter heißt der Bach aber wieder Hundskopftobelbach:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/464857957

Aus welcher Karte hast du den anderen Namen für den Bach? Das Land Vorarlberg nennt diesen Bach an der Hirschgehrenalpe offiziell Hundskopftobelbach.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-02-25 08:30:47+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Rybacka":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9807376653

"Osiedle pod Klonami":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11662259188

"Osiedle pod Sosnami":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11662259189

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
G_P_J (2024-02-25 14:51:10+00:00): Popawione.
Frans S (2024-02-26 09:16:30+00:00): Hello. Here you moved 1 node of the highway to the north, despite there was no need to change anything on that road. Can you tell me why you decided to move that node?
This behavior has been shown on many changesets and roads all over a few projects.
See this changeset
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=147881345
Best regards
Frans S (2024-02-25 17:30:39+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping. 
Perhaps you don't know, but you made a mess of the position of highways.
On several places you managed to 
move nodes of highways at least 300 mtr at random in a field. I presume unwanted and by accident. I correct them. 
Please check your work for irregularities before uploading your work.
Check this webpage after you uploaded your work
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=147881825 
This was the situation after you started mapping
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=71451658
best regards
Frans S (2024-02-26 09:20:04+00:00): Cleaned up the mess
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-25 10:11:15+00:00): Dzięki za posprzątanie
JochenOSM (2024-10-07 16:31:10+00:00): Warum hast du denn den Namen korrigiert? Jetzt ist das untere Teilstück anders benannt als das obere, ist aber die gleiche Straße. Die Schilder sind leider nicht an allen Kreuzungen einheitlich, siehe
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/61665615
Floz (2024-10-08 05:12:00+00:00): Ah, das hab ich nicht bemerkt. Meine Änderung hat den Grund, dass die Schreibweise mit Bindestrich orthografisch falsch ist. Es muss "Obere Walldürner Straße" und "Untere Walldürner Straße" heißen.
JochenOSM (2024-10-08 14:27:07+00:00): Ob die Schreibweise orthografisch falsch ist spielt aber doch keine Rolle, wenn die Stadt das auf allen weißen Straßenschildern mit Bindestrich ausschildert? Zum Beispiel auf Höhe Burgweg, Graubergstraße, und Antoniusweg. Solange es mit Bindestrich offiziell ausgeschildert ist würde ich vorschlagen es so zu mappen wie es vor Ort tatsächlich ist. Korrigierst du das bitte wieder?
Floz (2024-10-08 15:59:54+00:00): Getan. Aber seltsam ist es schon, dass sich so eine Beschriftung offiziell hält...
ygcgjp5 (2024-04-14 08:44:26+00:00): žymint šaligatvius ir pan dalykus reiktų patikrinti ar jie jau nebuvo pažymėti kaip sidewalk ant kelio žymų. Sudvajų g. ir pan. tikrai nereiktų žymėti atskirai (ir jie jau buvo ištrinti), nebent tai yra bendras dviračių ir pėsčiųjų takas...
DaanLT (2024-04-14 15:07:12+00:00): Tai žinau, tik nevisada pažiūriu kas dar ant gatvės sužymėta. O Sudvajų g. takai yra atskirti fiziniu plačiu ruožu, tai gali būti atskiri
ygcgjp5 (2024-04-14 17:44:39+00:00): Pagal naujausius mapillary vaizdus tas atskyrimas (žiūrint nuo naujo žiedo) yra apie metrą, tai tokie nėra žymimi atskirai. Greičiausiai viena Sudvajų pusė bus kombinuotas dviračių ir pėsčiųjų takas, tai jis turėtų likti, bet jeigu kita pusė liks šaligatviu tai egzistencijai prasmės nėra.
ygcgjp5 (2024-04-14 17:45:58+00:00): Rekomenduočiau į JOSM atsisiųsti S"idewalks and footways" stilių, nepakeičiamas pagalbininkas žymint šaligatvius ant kelių.
MxxCon (2024-03-29 02:51:50+00:00): SEO spam will be reverted.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147882164
Supaplex (2024-05-29 04:03:57+00:00): Revert due to it being a fake bus station

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151969801
silversurfer83 (2024-02-25 13:48:28+00:00): Moin :)

Objekte, die noch auf den Luftbildern sind lasse ich üblicherweise noch in der Datenbank mit dem lifecycle prefix und einer note (hier razed:highway=yes). Damit möchte ich verhindern, dass demnächst jemand vom Luftbild wieder Sachen einzeichnet, die es nicht mehr gibt.
Nur als Hinweis für die Zukunft.

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147882177
user_9221753 (2024-03-05 11:32:43+00:00): Γιατί κατέστρεψες το allignment που είχα κάνει με GPX tack???
gscholz (2024-02-26 06:44:52+00:00): Hi woy_cb,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-8.22805&lat=30.95077&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=147882242

As you may know, this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps. Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
woy_cb (2024-02-26 09:10:53+00:00): Hi Guido,
thanks for the feedback.
I have removed duplicated segments from the first link.
But I am sorry, I cannot identify whats wrong in the link overpass-api.de...
Can you help me?
Thanks Vojta
gscholz (2024-02-26 12:53:26+00:00): Hi woy_cb, 
thanks for you quick reply. The overpass-api link just shows precisely your changes. This may help to find the reasons for the errors.
Guido
NorthCrab_upload (2024-02-25 09:50:34+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/707234940

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
empty_child (2024-02-25 19:32:22+00:00): Good afternoon Irakli Ika,
Thank you for contributions.
Some moments. Please, don't overlap objects such as road and building. And keep in mind: all satellites photos have a shift. With tall buildings drawing, you need to move the outline from the roof projection to the place, where the basement is. You can see what I mean if compare current version of your edits
Syl (2024-02-25 10:06:41+00:00): Erreur dans le message, j'ai corrigé le type de l'élément.
Frans S (2024-02-26 11:26:18+00:00): solved issues
bxl-forever (2024-02-25 12:07:42+00:00): Hello,

I am afraid there is a little bit of an issue here:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7937159295
The app showed you this container and mentioned it is run by "Les Petits Riens - Spullenhulp".  AFAIK, they only collect clothes and you added that this container also collects glass bottles.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4908024068
The quest showed this container and a mention it is run by "Bruxelles-Propreté - Net Brussel".  You added that it also collects cooking oil.

I think those are mistakes.
If there are separate containers next to each other, make sure to answer the correct values for each and don’t mix the answers.
If there is an extra container that is not yet on the map, you can easily report the problem and we’ll add it.

Can you please confirm the situation for those two places.  This is necessary to make sure the database does not contain incorrect values.  Thanks in advance.
ArnoutVdc (2024-02-26 09:23:34+00:00): On StreetComplete it wasn't visible that there is a separate marker for the two containers, so I assumed the single marker was supposed to cover both. Can you revert those changes? I'll probably pass those spots again in the coming weeks so I can easily re-verify the precise situation in real life.
ArnoutVdc (2024-02-26 09:24:00+00:00): And thank you for the review! I hope I'll get better with future contributions.
GeoAndi (2024-02-25 11:47:13+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1254548487#map=18/49.31844/11.25841 soll wahrscheinlcih ein landuse=farmyard sein (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dfarmyard) ?
GeoAndi (2024-02-25 11:58:03+00:00): Und bei MPs bitte beachten, dass das outer-Mitglied eine Linie ist und die landuse-Eigenschaft auf die Relation kommt. Hab das hier mal bspw. verbessert (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147887441).
Viele Grüße.
HAmap (2024-02-25 15:18:58+00:00): ja, farmyard ...da hab ich mich vergriffen. Du bist aufmerksam wie immer :-)
Was genau war mein Fehler beim MP? muss ich mit einer Linie statt mit einer Fläche beginnen?
GeoAndi (2024-02-25 17:34:28+00:00): Genau, du zeichnest z.B für die umgebende Ackerfläche eine Linie statt eine Fläche, wählst dann im Editor links unter Relationen "Neue Relation", dann "Multipolygon" und dann als Objekttyp z.B die Ackerfläche. Dabei wird dann rechts im Kartenfenster aus deiner Linie eine Fläche und es erscheint ein Problem "Linie hat keine Rolle in Ackerfläche". Dort dann "Als außen einstellen" wählen". Damit hast du dann eine Linie, die mit der Rolle "outer" Bestandteil der Relation ist. Zum Abschluss musst du dann noch für die innere Fläche eine "normale" Fläche zeichnen und dann beim Objekt die gerade erstellte Relation plus Rolle "inner" auswählen.
Ich hoffe das beantwortet deine Frage und ist verständlich erklärt.
HAmap (2024-02-25 18:12:21+00:00): Das Prinzip habe ich dann verstanden, nur habe ich mit einer Fläche angefangen ... wird ausprobiert. Sehr verständlich, danke für die Mühe!
GeoAndi (2024-02-25 18:18:09+00:00): Bitte, kein Problem.
Nakaner (2024-02-27 16:21:50+00:00): Hi,

is there really a alpine hut as described in wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism=alpine_hut

Or is it just a shelter (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=shelter)?

Best regards

Michael
Nakaner (2024-03-07 12:54:10+00:00): This changeset was reverted because the user did not respond within reasonable time.
felipeeugenio (2024-02-25 12:52:57+00:00): Hola. Por favor escribir de manera normal. No con mayúsculas.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-02-25 10:40:16+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1095488180

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
woodpeck_repair (2024-02-25 10:35:05+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 147222947, 147223089, 147223144, 147223230.
Kin Sapalot (2024-02-25 20:34:18+00:00): Hi,

Just curious, why change h2 to H2 when osm wiki states the tag should really be fuel:LH2 ?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:fuel:LH2

Best regards,
Kin
mueschel (2024-02-25 21:41:03+00:00): Hi,
fuel:LH2 is only correct if they sell liquid hydrogen - without knowing if it's liquid or gas I can't change that, so I left it as fuel:H2 - which is already in use in some other cases while fuel:h2 was usedonly here.
Changing it to LH2, h35, h70 or whatever  else is up to someone who knows better.
mathis57 (2024-02-25 10:46:06+00:00): En attente de vérification pour la ligne C13.
Louis Amiot (2024-06-19 12:46:44+00:00): Bonjour,
Pourquoi avoir modifié le type de route de highway=living_street en hignway=residential ? Il s'agit bien d'une zone de rencontre.
Egalement, pour l'étroitesse de la voie, la documentation semble recommander d'indiquer directement la largeur plutôt que lanes=1 (voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:lanes?uselang=fr#Routes_%C3%A9troites)
pitfire (2024-02-25 12:21:42+00:00): Hallo Klöver,
der "Weg: Vorstadt (1254556431)" ist nicht layer=-1. (unterirdisch), sondern "building_passage"
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:tunnel%3Dbuilding_passage

Das Attribut Tunnel=building_passage wird für Wege verwendet, die durch ein Gebäude führen und auf beiden Seiten Wände haben. Sie befinden sich normalerweise im Erdgeschoss. 
Der layer=* sollte mit dem layer des Gebäudes identisch sein!
nevw (2024-02-25 12:14:13+00:00): Hi, street names are not abbreviated in osm. I will fix these.
Cam-I-Am (2024-02-25 22:09:19+00:00): Hi @nevw, I didn't set the name on this street, it was already like that. But thank you, I will keep this in mind if I see other abbreviated street names! :)
nevw (2024-02-26 00:38:46+00:00): Oh, I apologise for that @Cam-I-Am. I forgot to look at the history.
Cam-I-Am (2024-02-26 02:17:56+00:00): All good! :)
Metzor (2024-02-27 19:59:28+00:00): Hallo AletGPS,

Brouter suspect beschwert sich, weil du ein Stück von der Auffahrt entfernt hast. Ein Kommentar wäre hilfreich, ob das so Absicht war. Hintendran bestehen die Daten der Auffahrt weiterhin. Und in echt? Ist da Baustelle? Wie lange ca? Wieso nicht als construction getaggt?

Schöne Grüße und fröhliches Mappen
Metzor
woodpeck_repair (2024-02-25 11:14:48+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 147223348, 147223415, 147265639.