piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
kre777 (2024-12-23 08:36:15+00:00): The Bing aerial image is slightly distorted. Your changes “Railway switch positions” like this https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160415567 has worsened the position of the rails. Esiri world view (identical to Bavaria 80 cm) is the best aerial view and the least distorted. Greetings kre777 (translated by deepl)
jogemu (2024-12-23 14:58:07+00:00): Danke für dein Feedback, ich habe bereits eine Präferenz für Bavaria vermutet, aber keinen großen Unterschied der Verzerrung bezogen auf Bavaria zwischen Bing und Esri vermutet. Mich würde interessieren, ob du meine Änderungen mit dem alten Schienenverlauf verglichen hast, denn die Position der Schienen war überwiegend ungenauer als jetzt. Ich möchte damit aber nicht die Verschlechterung kleinreden, die Abschnittsweise auftreten, wenn Änderungen weniger als die typischen 8-14 Jahre zurückliegen.

Wie unzufrieden bist du mit der Genauigkeit? Während meiner stichprobenartigen Kontrolle lagen Meilensteine und Signale mit Esri noch innerhalb der Bahnschwellen, während die alten Positionen außerhalb lagen, daher würde ich von einem Revert absehen.
kre777 (2024-12-25 10:39:18+00:00): Hallo jogemu.
Danke das Du (in Deutsch) antwortest. Passt schon. Die Veränderung ist nur minimal und die Karte ist jetzt genauso 'gut' wie vorher (am Bahnhof in Übersee - andere Schienen hab ich nicht verglichen). Also m.M.n ist ein Revert nicht notwendig. Auf deine Schienenkorrekturen anderen Ortes kannst du ja selbst nochmal ein Auge werfen und evtl. nochmal aktiv werden. Grüße kre777
Fizzie-DWG (2025-01-27 02:38:21+00:00): DWG revert - Google Maps used as Source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161801913
Oskarst_ (2025-02-27 14:31:27+00:00): Hi, 

Seems like part of the Arizona trail you mapped (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1344928151) already exists. It now partly duplicates with another way (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/760427259/history)
. Furthermore, it does not have a highway tag, so as of now it is not routable.
Aaron Seifert GISP (2025-03-02 00:48:45+00:00): Thanks.  I removed the duplicate and added the highway tag = bikeway
Oskarst_ (2025-03-05 22:07:41+00:00): It seems like there's a misunderstanding as you've deleted the older existing way with proper tags. The duplicate way I was referring to was the newer one that you added, which you've decided to keep instead. It's considered best practice to keep older ways in such instances.,Also, highway=bikeway isn't an accepted tag so the way is probably not routable. Lastly, it looks like you're mapping a larger trail. These are much better to add as a relation in which several different ways make up the larger trail. You can look to popular routes such as the Pacific Crest Trail for reference: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1238538#map=11/34.3905/-117.8954

I'd suggest reverting the removal of  way 760427259
Aaron Seifert GISP (2025-03-08 23:59:27+00:00): Hello. Ok I am fairly new to Open Street Map and do not know where to look or what to do to revert the removal.

Yes I am updating Open Street Map with changes to the Arizona National Scenic Trail (Arizona Trail) which is already a relation made that I have merely updated/corrected recently.
Baloo Uriza (2024-12-23 14:04:19+00:00): Please remember OSM is not an advertising platform, the description tag (along with all other tags) are inappropriate locations for ad copy.

Also please don't abbreviate street names or phone numbers.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160522996
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-21 09:38:00+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12443035605/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
BudgieInWA (2025-04-21 10:23:56+00:00): It is a place where you pay to go and paint pottery that you get to take home. I don't know the correct tagging. Somewhat like a "paint and sip" place.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-23 17:12:47+00:00): are you also making pottery there? or are you just painting already prepared one?
BudgieInWA (2025-05-24 03:17:46+00:00): Only painting pre-made pieces.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-24 10:59:43+00:00): No idea how to tag those, started https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/how-to-tag-place-where-you-come-in-to-paint-prepared-pottery-and-take-it-home/130501
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:15:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
JassKurn (2024-12-23 17:03:46+00:00): Hi MapSpot,

From memory this is not access=private. It is privately owned and used by public without restriction. A more likely access tag is highway=permissive.

I can see your retagging several objects from private=yes to access=private. That can not be assumed from the tagging because private=yes is poorly used  to tag access or ownership.
In this case its ownership.
MapSpot (2024-12-23 18:29:28+00:00): Thanks for checking. I know this used to be signed as a private road, but if access isn't strictly prohibited, I'll change it to =permissive with ownership=private.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:18:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
ndm (2024-12-30 19:32:15+00:00): This should not be marked as private it is a public road.
MapSpot (2024-12-31 04:52:38+00:00): Ah, sorry about the confusion. I was a bit misled by the meaning of the tag private=yes on these roadways. I've since fixed the access tags and added some additional lane tags and street-side parking areas.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:18:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:18:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:15:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-12-25 00:47:43+00:00): This changeset deleted a lot of roads and buildings
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160524811
f_husni (2025-01-02 03:04:59+00:00): hallo kartalakopang, saya ingin tahu alasan anda mengapa banyak objek di hapus. dan anda menghapus beberapa jalan tertiary bahkan trunk. tolong jelaskan apa dasar nya anda menghapus objek2 tersebut? osm adalah peta yang dibangun komunitas dan memiliki sop. jika anda ingin melakukan editing silahkan bisa baca terlebih dahulu panduan di https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Indonesian_Tagging_Guidelines
freeExec (2025-01-02 22:44:12+00:00): Зачем вы развоили улицу, там нет физического разделителя, а количество полос мало, чтобы это имело хоть какой-то смысл. Теперь маршруты общественного транспорта там сломаны, количество полос в разных направлениях неверное, ограничения на повороты тоже показывают не туда.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-08 04:54:37+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164660151
Dimitar155 (2024-12-23 10:47:11+00:00): You can also tag them using flag=no (flag meaning спиркознак, not the road sign for bus stop).

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:flag

Happy holidays,
Dimitar
rhhs (2024-12-23 11:17:10+00:00): It's rarely used. I added them but kept the notes. Thanks!
tguen (2025-02-15 00:59:18+00:00): According to Bing Streetside imagery, this hotel is signed only as Hyatt Place. Per the "on the ground" rule, the name tag should match. New York/Midtown is already in the branch tag. Please fix.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Map_what's_on_the_ground
Alena1308 (2025-02-18 09:22:09+00:00): fixed
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:13:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
Enock4seth (2025-02-08 17:49:18+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap, I have reviewed your changeset, kindly download existing data in JOSM before adding new features. This changeset introduced multiple overlapping and duplicate buildings as there exist some data in OSM. I have reverted this changeset.
NeisBot (2024-12-23 07:26:38+00:00): Hi slash_opi, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 91% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 170 building(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=160526275
pitscheplatsch (2024-12-23 08:13:03+00:00): Looks like some contributors added buildings, while others decided to play 'build and remove' later ...
frivjuegoscomco (2024-12-23 07:50:05+00:00): https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1sARQVtIULUlqUd2-OOx0CZ8EJdumASyC-Z0TcAoiQZ0/edit?usp=drivesdk
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1zxmJAQNP9mAnXemu4jV8u2bZZKYLIG88
https://sites.google.com/view/frivjuegoscomco/home
https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer?mid=1IlmUuilK9lqJNMn9YeQ_vc3ArvJqlZk
https://frivjuegoscomco.blogspot.com/2024/12/az888.html
https://vimeo.com/1041648734
https://x.com/frivjuegoscomco/status/1871090629142602044
https://creators.spotify.com/pod/show/frivjuegoscomco/episodes/Nh-Ci-AZ888-Sn-Chi-C-Cc-Chuyn-Nghip-e2slldn/a-abmp81v
https://www.scoop.it/topic/nha-cai-nohu90-by-nha-cai-nohu90-1/p/4163072535/2024/12/23/az888-cong-game-bai-hap-dan-nhat-2024
Taya_S (2024-12-23 08:37:08+00:00): Reverted SEO vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160528023
Fizzie-DWG (2025-01-27 02:38:15+00:00): DWG revert - Google Maps used as Source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161801910
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:20:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
Andrea Musuruane (2024-12-23 18:48:42+00:00): Ciao. Per favore, non inserire nel tag website link a booking o altro sito di terze parte. Questo tag è usato solamente per indicare il sito web ufficiale. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160528106
GAL Valli del Canavese (2024-12-24 08:34:05+00:00): Ciao, sì scusami sto cercando di capire come usarlo al meglio, modifico subito le strutture in cui ho inserito link a terze parti.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160528106
GAL Valli del Canavese (2024-12-24 08:34:06+00:00): Ciao, sì scusami sto cercando di capire come usarlo al meglio, modifico subito le strutture in cui ho inserito link a terze parti.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160528106
GAL Valli del Canavese (2024-12-24 08:34:16+00:00): Ciao, sì scusami sto cercando di capire come usarlo al meglio, modifico subito le strutture in cui ho inserito link a terze parti.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160528106
Branko Kokanovic (2024-12-23 23:38:05+00:00): reverted. I don't understand why you continue to edit cemetary when we are reverting your changes. You are risking ban from OSM due to your behaviour
---
Revertovano. Ne razumem zasto nastavljas da menjas groblja kada vracamo sve tvoje izmene. Rizikujes da budes kompletno banovan sa OSM-a
totera (2025-11-28 17:47:09+00:00): Ciao Aluminium, la Polizia Municipale non è militare
gscscnd (2024-12-24 10:21:17+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1344992912
highway=residential
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/147513575
maxspeed=50 chyba zbędne
HellMap (2024-12-23 13:40:18+00:00): Hello,

This road https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/425515678 leads to multiple properties (residential and farmland), so it should normally stay unclassified. See also the cadaster layer divisions. Unless you can clarify what changes have happened here or what restriction/signage is here?
sorcrosc (2025-01-05 10:22:52+00:00): Buongiorno. Come sono stati identificati e posizionati questi punti? Ho controllato questo e non si trova per niente in quella posizione.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12443490346
FrancescaMaggiori (2025-01-05 11:17:03+00:00): Buongiorno, per inserire quel punto mi sono affidata all'indirizzo che l'host ha segnalato su booking.
sorcrosc (2025-01-05 12:55:16+00:00): Non puoi copiare da altre fonti a meno che le licenze d'uso non lo consentano. Questo è ciò che dichiara booking.com: 
"Non ti è consentito monitorare, copiare, estrapolare/raccogliere, scaricare, riprodurre o utilizzare in altro modo elementi della nostra Piattaforma per scopi commerciali senza autorizzazione scritta di Booking.com o dei propri licenziatari."

Dovresti eliminare ciò che hai inserito senza verificare personalmente
sorcrosc (2025-01-05 16:00:15+00:00): Questo era già mappato poco a sud-ovest
HellMap (2024-12-23 13:47:33+00:00): Can you please clarify what you intended with the `access=customers` restriction for the cemetery paths? Is this a closed/private cemetery and access is regulated? You haven't placed the same restrictions on the parking, toilets or cemetery itself. The Southern path does not even appear to be part of the cemetery. And what does it mean "customers" - surely, there's no entry fee or tickets or reservation or anything like that?

You also still have not yet responded to a similar concern at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159874931
HellMap (2025-01-10 10:13:47+00:00): You haven't responded, so I have removed these access values for now.
kautkas (2025-01-14 18:23:05+00:00): Didn't see your comment.

It is cemetery (place with religion and spiritual meaning) and I believe allowed access to cemetery should be allowed to the visitors of the deseaced (customers), not some random could walk. 

My edits all on trails and road focus, dont look at  area tags.
HellMap (2025-01-14 18:53:22+00:00): Thanks for replying.

Access restrictions on OSM means legal/permitted access. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access . Notably, this never means subjective reasons like solely religious or spiritual that you mention. These must be based on verifiable criteria, such as laws, municipality regulations, traffic signs, property usage rules or something like that. See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Verifiability .

The value `customers` means just that - a customer of a business, such as someone shopping, paying for service, buying a ticket, etc. and is thus gaining access to the location. Normally, anyone can become a customer. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Dcustomers . This would almost never apply to a location like a cemetery. If the cemetery is gated and permission is only granted to individuals, then it is `private`. If the cemetery is open, then it's public access.

Sniķeru kapi is owned by the Sigulda municipality (as per "Par kapsētu uzturēšanu un lietošanu Siguldas novadā" law), so it is almost certainly public unless there is something special here (which is why I asked to be sure).

Regarding area tags, they are part of the map. Any values you place on ways also indirectly impact surrounding features. They must match or they don't make sense (for example, public parking for a private cemetery).

Let me know if I can clarify anything else.
NeisBot (2025-02-06 10:34:37+00:00): Hi 悠龍游Yoronyo, thank you for your contribution to the OSM project.

Over the last days and weeks, you've made at least 30 with minimal or no meaningful comments.

To enhance collaboration, please consider using the comment field to describe your map changes. This helps others understand and follow your adjustments more easily. You can find guidance on good changeset comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 

Thanks!

I've also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
Lezurex (2024-12-23 12:19:04+00:00): Hallo Piagno,

Der scheint noch nicht offen zu sein, auf der Website ist davon keine Spur.

"Man" ist im Übrigen kein branch, das sollte Teil des Namens sein.

LG Lezurex
Piagno (2024-12-23 19:38:59+00:00): Salü
Am Gebäude ist der Laden bereits angeschrieben, deswegen habe ich ihn hinzugefügt. Du hast aber recht, er hat noch nicht geöffnet.
"Man" habe ich nun zum Namen verschoben. iD wollte es aus dem Namen löschen und als branch=Man machen. Ich dachte, so einen spezifischen Vorschlag hat auch einen validen Hintergrund...
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160551373
eggie (2024-12-23 09:43:01+00:00): Dag Ron,

Volgens de BGT heet het hier De Spie.
Die naam is getagd door een lokale mapper. Hoe kom je aan Spiestraat?

De adresnodes geven overigens Bredaseweg aan.
https://www.verbeterdekaart.nl/#?geometry.x=128546.38&geometry.y=396858.51&zoomlevel=12.35

MVG
eggie
ronbouwmeester (2024-12-23 09:47:23+00:00): Hi Eggie,

Kan ik een foto uploaden hierin?
Ik ben daar regelmatig op locatie geweest en de plattegrond die daar van Amarant geplaatst staat , heet de straat dus Spiestraat.
Mvg,
Ron
eggie (2024-12-23 10:55:16+00:00): Hoi Rob..
Ik geloof je direct. Je zou een terugmelding kunnen doen richting BGT Kadaster via bovenstaande site, want daar staat het verkeerd. Een volgende mapper past het anders opnieuw aan.
Maar of de plattegrond klopt is ook maar de vraag. 😀

Mvg
eggie
eggie (2024-12-23 10:56:18+00:00): .. nee .. je hoeft niets te bewijzen.. foto uploaden werkt niet via dit platform.
HantDX (2025-01-21 19:47:09+00:00): Actually these 2 ruins are already demolished. (survey, 2024-09-28).
eggie (2024-12-23 10:59:01+00:00): Hoi.. 
Meestal wordt amenity=charging_station gebruikt. Zie wiki.. 
Dat rendert op de kaart als laadpaal.
Groet..
eggie
ronbouwmeester (2024-12-24 12:08:30+00:00): Ok bedankt
Groet,
Ron
woodpeck (2024-12-23 12:23:28+00:00): Dear Estherluanda, please use the "comment" field only for human-readable text when uploading ("mapped buildings in Goma" is fine). Hashtags belong in the "hashtags" field, and image source information belongs in the "source" field.
one_half_3544 (2025-01-13 20:22:16+00:00): Это тропы (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1345034883) не существует в реальности. Пожалуйста, не надо добавлять неверную информацию в ОСМ, это подрывает доверие к проекту
Hidden Mountain (2025-01-15 02:53:39+00:00): И снова здравствуйте, а мы разве не сошлись в предыдущем обсуждении на том, что добавить нужно тег trail visibility?
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-13 01:08:40+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164876590
okadatsuneo (2025-01-04 23:48:29+00:00): 広島駅ビル前に移動されたバス停は、現在は元の位置のビルの中にあるのが正解と思いますが、いつの情報を元に編集されましたか？
one_half_3544 (2025-01-07 16:51:51+00:00): Давайте не будем отмечать несуществующие тропы, это противоречит правилам проекта (truth on the ground) и вводит пользователей в заблуждение
Hidden Mountain (2025-01-07 17:06:13+00:00): Приветствую, а как вы определили, что тропа не существует. Посмотрите на тропу на Эверест, может быть ее тоже не существует? Но она есть на карте. Также я скоро полезу на вулкан в Колумбии и тоже по тропе через ледник. Поэтому единственный, кто вводит сейчас в заблуждение это Вы.
one_half_3544 (2025-01-07 17:11:49+00:00): На Эвересте не был, но сезонную (существующую два раза в год) тропу в снегу неправильно отмечать как highway=path.


Тропа на леднике будет отмаркирвана вешками? турами? как определить, что она существует, если о ней не знать?


То, что там кто-то один раз прошёл (как в случае с перевалами тут) не означает, что там есть тропа.
Hidden Mountain (2025-01-07 17:16:35+00:00): То что, кто-то там один раз прошел и назвал перевал в отчете по туризму, не означает, что перевал существует в реестре рго Казахстана. Поэтому есть предложение руководствоваться мировой практикой по нанесению троп и не поднимать спор, там где он бессмысленный.
one_half_3544 (2025-01-07 18:15:02+00:00): Дело в том, что перевал существует физически в реальности независимо от каких-либо реестров.

С тропами - добавляйте, пожалуйста, trail_visiblity=no на такие "тропы", это поможет в будущем.

Спасибо
one_half_3544 (2025-01-07 18:42:20+00:00): Дискуссия на эту тему
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/alpinist-routes-marked-as-footpaths/117644
Hidden Mountain (2025-01-07 18:51:11+00:00): Перевал существует, название нет, если мы говорим о правде на земле. Получается, что правда это всего лишь точка зрения. И так можно полкарты удалить и потом смотреть снова на чистый лист) Я Вам скину тропу из Колумбии после того, как пройду ее.
Hidden Mountain (2025-01-07 18:51:50+00:00): Тег добавить не проблема, но я раньше февраля не смогу этим заняться
Joseph R P (2024-12-30 20:42:29+00:00): Hello, please be more careful when updating under-construction roads. The two under-construction highway ramps you changed to open motorway links no longer exists, and the section of Commerce road which was tagged as under construction is not open yet and was not given proper highway tags when you updated it. Thanks.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-12-23 10:40:54+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12443804611
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12443804612

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
rempshaener (2024-12-23 13:24:03+00:00): Hallo,
landuse über landuse ist etwas unglücklich. Du hättest dir nicht vielleicht die Mühe machen können, die Stücke freizuschneiden, was ohne Weiteres möglich wäre?
Viele Grüße
kartograferus (2024-12-23 11:12:03+00:00): Коллега, забор указан абсолютно неверно. В данный момент дома Шарова 25 и 23а уже сданы(как и Монтажников 42/1), забор сейчас идет вдоль дома 23. Сегодня утром выходил и по местности отредактировал зону стройки
Jrachi (2024-12-23 13:55:26+00:00): Ciao.
un nodo con name=Frana non ha nessun significato su OSM.
Forse volevi indicare che una frana ha coinvolto il sentiero?
In tal caso ci sono altri modi per inserirlo del DataBase

Ivo
Jrachi (2024-12-26 15:39:50+00:00): In mancanza di risposta provvedo a cancellare il nome improprio
rempshaener (2024-12-23 13:13:45+00:00): Ich habe deine Änderungen rückgängig gemacht.
Ich komme dort regelmäßig vorbei, ich habe dort noch nie eine Kunstausstellung gesehen. Das würde wohl auch eher dem Charakter der Feuerwehrzufahrt widersprechen. Und selbst wenn es so wäre: dann ist es kein track, sondern ein path. Zudem ist dann auch das emergency=designated falsch.
Szymson (2024-12-23 14:58:23+00:00): +1, dzięki :D