piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Patchi (2024-02-19 17:31:17+00:00): Hello Tag Upgrade Bot,

This change doesn't seem correct. The TER 04 ist not a member of the network TGV InOui and never will be.
Therefore please update your rules in order not to change the 
`network:wikidata=Q3512123` and 
`network=TER Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur` when you have a name like TER.

Thanks in advance and best regards,

Patchi.
cxc (2024-02-19 11:53:09+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Swimming_and_bathing

... ciao, grazie per il tuo contributo su OSM ... ti inviterei a leggere la wiki per definire il POI da mappare
mavl (2024-03-23 14:38:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149053741 where the changeset comment is: The
julcnx (2024-04-24 09:19:35+00:00): Hey, thank you for your contributions! I noticed you've marked some narrow roads providing access to the main entrances of residences as 'service=alley'. One tip for future edits: we encourage to tag these as 'highway=residential' with additional tags like `lanes=1`, `width=*`. This is because roads should be on their primary function, and `service-alley` is reserved in Thailand for service roads providing access to utilities such as back gardens, rear entrances, fire exits, and storage areas. You can read more about this on the Thailand wiki. If you have any questions, feel free to ask. Cheers. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Thailand#Urban_and_Local_Road_wide_enough_for_motor_cars
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147605564
mavl (2024-03-23 14:38:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149053741 where the changeset comment is: The
MorahT (2024-02-24 00:40:33+00:00): What was the reason for this change and why did you remove the island from the lake?
Cebderby (2024-02-24 18:17:51+00:00): Wrongly removed island undeleted and re-added as lake multipolygon inner member.  Names case fixed: 
Note to user webhound: name= tag should only contain the proper (and verifiable) name of the feature, in title case ie capitalised initial letters, rest lower case, eg "Oxlease Lake".  Not all upper case, not some words in lower case. You should also indicate your source somewhere for these names when you add them.
literan (2024-02-21 20:37:22+00:00): не надо приклеивать здания к тротуарам
Михаил 1995 (2024-03-01 11:52:43+00:00): понял
mavl (2024-03-23 14:38:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149053741 where the changeset comment is: The
mavl (2024-03-23 14:38:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149053741 where the changeset comment is: The
Patchi (2024-02-19 17:36:07+00:00): Hello Tag Upgrade Bot,

This change doesn't seem correct. Changing the network from the train relations und master relation may not be a good idea. More over I don't understand why add an network=* and network:wikidata=* to the train station? So please update your rules.

Thanks in advance and best regards,

Patchi.
zstadler (2024-04-23 11:50:12+00:00): שלום אלכס,

תודה על תרומתך ל
OSM!

סימנת כאן, באיזור ירוחם, משהו בשם "המפל הלבן" 
אני מכיר את "המפל הלבן" בגולן.
https://israelhiking.osm.org.il/poi/OSM/node_2905591856?language=he

האם המיקום כאן הוא טעות?
hatul (2024-10-30 10:32:36+00:00): מחקתי, נראה שמדובר על סתם מפל יבש ובלי תגיות אין בו בכלל טעם.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-02-18 12:30:22+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/396669059

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
mavl (2024-03-23 14:38:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149053741 where the changeset comment is: The
mavl (2024-03-23 14:38:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149053741 where the changeset comment is: The
mavl (2024-03-23 14:38:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149053741 where the changeset comment is: The
真中あお (2024-02-26 20:03:27+00:00): 感谢阁下愿意为地图做贡献，但我注意到，这一笔编辑将已经以面状要素绘制的亭子删除，重新改成了点状元素。这令我不解。可否解释一下这样做的理由？
真中あお (2024-02-26 20:15:14+00:00): 另外，在https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147178101
变更集中，阁下删除了西康博物馆门前客观存在的树列。这也让我不理解。
AntEntro (2024-03-09 05:36:06+00:00): 关于亭子，本人实际到访亭子，得到的位置与你画的有偏差，新的位置只有点状信息，卫星底图精度不够，尚不足以看出轮廓。
关于树列，实际到访时是个广场，并未存在，沿着博物馆门口的广场往下是可以步行的道路。
真中あお (2024-03-25 11:16:45+00:00): 西康博物馆的树列恐怕是你记错了。https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/P9jTVgfqDLjGfXJUw_wMLw 这篇文章里的航拍图像，和最新卫星照片都可以清晰看到那排树。
关于亭子，调整位置当然是恰当的，但是我想直接拖动原有物体就可以了。虽然您不清楚建筑形状，但不妨相信别的编辑者吧。
AntEntro (2024-03-25 14:14:17+00:00): 树列不知是记错还是新植，依你为准，谢谢。
移除亭子的轮廓还有一个原因是觉得，参照图中的比例尺，画得过大了，所以存疑。
真中あお (2024-03-26 15:23:36+00:00): 2009年GoogleEarth最早一张卫星图上就有这排树了，并非新种的。
亭子的屋顶在卫星图上是看得到的，（请参见https://osmcha.org/changesets/147607369），大小并没有问题。
AntEntro (2024-03-27 13:39:22+00:00): 关于亭子，你所提到的是mapbox吗？恕我并不能清晰看出多边形轮廓，只是一团灰色，与其他欧美地区的清晰底图尚有较大差别，这种清晰度我只能用点状表示。
真中あお (2024-03-27 14:26:23+00:00): 把底图切换到bing就很清晰了。
真中あお (2024-03-27 14:28:17+00:00): 况且，若是阁下看不出亭子的大小，又何来底气认为现有数据不对呢？
mavl (2024-03-23 14:38:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149053741 where the changeset comment is: The
mavl (2024-03-23 14:38:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149053741 where the changeset comment is: The
maraf24 (2024-02-20 09:56:41+00:00): Cześć
Skąd pochodzą te granice? W Polsce wsie nie mają oficjalnych granic, a tym bardziej przysiółki.
mavl (2024-03-23 14:38:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149053741 where the changeset comment is: The
mavl (2024-03-23 14:38:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149053741 where the changeset comment is: The
mavl (2024-03-23 14:38:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149053741 where the changeset comment is: The
mappinglander (2024-02-18 16:59:22+00:00): merhabalar,
1594 tane üst üste binen bina haritalamışsınız. binalar sadece içinde kalan kısım olacak şekilde çizilir. renderer için mi haritalıyorsunuz bilmiyorum ama rica etsem düzenlemeyi geri alabilir misiniz, binalar böyle haritalanmıyor - doğru olmaz böyle
mavl (2024-03-23 14:38:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149053741 where the changeset comment is: The
ibanez (2024-02-18 16:58:56+00:00): Hallo, die Nummer 24 kann hier von der Abfolge nicht stimmen, zumal am Gebäude keine Hausnummer angebracht ist. Welche Quelle wurde benutzt?
Gruß Jens
Kovoschiz (2024-02-18 22:58:01+00:00): Have I not reminded you there should not be such brackets? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
If you make them long, it won't be displayed in some maps easily either. You can't expect the label to have all info.
TheGreenOne (2024-02-18 13:26:04+00:00): Merhaba, yaptığınız değişikliklerde üst üste binalar içeriyor. Lütfen bu şekilde düzenlemeye devam etmeyin.
Jez Nicholson (2024-02-22 10:33:41+00:00): Yes, it is a bit of an oddity. I know that there is a debate going on at Talk-GB mailing list. What's the definition of 'public transport'? 'state owned' or 'anyone can buy a ticket and travel to somewhere (e.g. Btn Aquarium to Black Rock)'
5HAD0W@Brighton&Hove (2024-03-03 17:37:11+00:00): Hi Jez, soooo UK has something called National Rail which is public transport. 

Brighton Aquarium to Black rock is not part of that network its its own private thing and a tourist attraction.

The nearest public transport rail station is Brighton.
flurger (2024-08-11 12:57:39+00:00): Welchen Zweck hat die Linie 1252011767?
Alle weiteren Änderungen befinden sich in Owen. Wurde diese Linie versehentlich erstellt?
aetraveller (2024-08-12 04:58:39+00:00): Ja,versehentlich.
s8321414 (2024-02-18 14:33:17+00:00): 您好，這些編輯有相關的規劃文件可以證明嗎？若無則不應該繪製，若有，尚未蓋好的道路也不應直接繪製到地圖上，請使用 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:proposed:* 或 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:construction:*
redd (2024-02-18 15:08:46+00:00): some may asking why I added wikipedia:de since in theory it is not needed due to wikipedias language feature. I added wikipedia:de nevertheless because the zh wikipedia is very slow when compared with my local de wikipedia
Supaplex (2024-02-19 03:12:14+00:00): It is still strange. You might ask Wikimedia Foundation to improve your location's internet connection. Not related to OpenStreetMap data source.
sen_takeya (2024-02-19 04:24:48+00:00): どうもこんにちは
あなたの名前が出ないようだけど特殊アカウントってことですか？
iigmir (2024-02-22 15:49:40+00:00): sen_takeya さん、こんにちは。あの方のアカウント名前はたぶん、これです：
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/%E2%80%8B%E2%80%8B%E2%80%8B%E2%80%8B%E2%80%8B%E2%80%8B%E2%80%8B%E2%80%8B%E2%80%8B%E2%80%8B%E2%80%8B%E2%80%8B%E2%80%8B%E2%80%8B%E2%80%8B

あの方のアカウントidは20978700です。この不具合は報告されると思います。
sen_takeya (2024-02-23 04:18:17+00:00): iigmir さん、こんにちは。情報をありがとうございます。
iigmir (2024-02-25 13:03:22+00:00): sen_takeya さん、こちらこそ。ただいま誰かあの不具合を報告しました。
https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/4538
Corday (2024-02-18 14:31:27+00:00): note : je ne suis pas sûr de la partie finale. Le tracé initial était carossable c'est certain. Il vaut peut-être mieux le laisser comme c'était avant ma modification? Je ne sais pas trop
luiswoo (2024-02-18 14:37:12+00:00): что мешает в редакторе отключить отображение в Данные карты\Объекты на карте — Объекты землепользования и вообще любые другие типы объектов, кроме зданий, и не дергать лишнее? Если учесть, что кроме зданий вам ничего не нужно.
mavl (2024-03-23 14:38:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149053741 where the changeset comment is: The
mavl (2024-03-23 14:38:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149053741 where the changeset comment is: The
NorthCrab_upload (2024-02-18 14:40:36+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/781085670
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/781088471

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
laria (2024-02-18 14:33:53+00:00): Vergessen im Changeset zu erwähnen: source=survey :). Außerdem den Trace hier von mir genutzt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/laria/traces/11289503
literan (2024-02-21 20:35:39+00:00): вандализм: вы удалили здание с множеством полезных тегов. Вас ждет блокировка.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-02-18 14:50:13+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1135430719
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1252035514

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
conradoos (2024-02-18 20:10:18+00:00): You're making a terrible mess - you have added overlapping buildings. Stop mapping like way!
woodpeck (2024-02-19 09:21:49+00:00): Dear ACGG, when you want to import third-party data into OSM you need to discuss this with the community first and provide proper source information. This import was not only not discussed, it was also buggy. See: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
mavl (2024-03-23 14:38:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149053741 where the changeset comment is: The
NorthCrab_upload (2024-02-18 15:00:26+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2085834436
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/241829752

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
mavl (2024-03-23 14:39:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149053741 where the changeset comment is: The
Bobropiton (2024-03-10 19:25:25+00:00): https://t.me/ruosm/766232
mavl (2024-03-23 14:38:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149053741 where the changeset comment is: The
jengelh (2024-02-18 15:13:42+00:00): PIC: https://paste.opensuse.org/pastes/a67c815ead11
Azharul Islam Anik (2024-02-18 15:15:17+00:00): Fixed a building error. Thanks for the contribution.
OSM_RogerWilco (2024-02-20 08:36:22+00:00): Hallo Blütenkirsche,
handelt sich um ein einzelnes Grab oder mehrere Gräber?
Viele Grüße
Roger Wilco
literan (2024-02-21 20:34:05+00:00): отрисовано тяп-ляп, откат (поверх газона)
zby-cz (2024-02-18 15:24:41+00:00): Thanks @mueschel. We changed all our occurences to the :1 version.

via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147273712

cc @jvaclavik
emersonveenstra (2024-02-19 12:54:19+00:00): Hi there,

On https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1252052221 you created a oneway road with "lanes:forward" and "lanes:backward". Could you please fix that and double check the lane count is accurate? Thanks!
BCNorwich (2024-02-19 08:34:31+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Just to let you know that placing a highway (Footpath Way: 1252055064) on top of an existing highway (Service Road Way: 673927258) disrupts routing. Thus I've removed the footpath from atop the service road.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2024-02-19 08:47:44+00:00): Also highways within school grounds would not be classed as residential, they would be service roads. In fact a lot of them actually look like footpaths.

I've made some amendments.

Regards Bernard
BCNorwich (2024-02-19 09:24:58+00:00): Hi, Placing buildings within buildings is not the right thing to do. Rather the existing building should be split into the relevant new areas and each new area tagged. I've amended the existing school building to suit your new info.

Regards Bernard.
alester (2024-02-18 17:08:03+00:00): Please don't add marketing text to the object. I've removed that again, and updated a couple of the other tags to better match the typical OSM usage.
Jordi MF (2024-02-19 19:39:29+00:00): Hola tuchy,

Ten en cuenta que cuando se añaden sendas (o cualquier vía) éstas deben de unirse (intersectar) con otra senda. Prácticamente todas las sendas que has añadido nunca las conectas con otra vía. Por tanto, cualquier ruteador pensará que están desconectadas y no podrá crear rutas. Uniré las sendas para corregirlo.

Saludos,
Jordi.
tuchy (2024-02-20 18:54:03+00:00): gracias por los consejos ,yo marco las sendas con la aplicación .,.Go map ..y ya he visto que me salen actualizadas en los mapas de suunto ..se actualizan rápido ,
Tú qué eres de la zona de benidorm..?? titeo por esta zona y veo que faltan sendas por marcar
Jordi MF (2024-02-20 20:08:43+00:00): Ya entiendo... Veo que editas con Go Map y Go Map no es capaz de unir correctamente las sendas. Puede que veas las sendas bien unidas porque a las pocas horas de crearlas tú, yo las uno con el editor web de OpenStreetMap (www.openstreetmap.org). Te recomiendo editar desde esa web, que es la oficial de OpenStreetMap y contiene muchas más opciones.

Edito por todo el territorio valenciano, pero suelo revisar, como otros editores, las ediciones de los nuevos usuarios. También he visto que por esa zona hay muchas sendas y pistas no mapeadas (parecen hechas por corredores o por BTTs). Te invito a seguir añadiéndolas, pero a ser posible desde la web. Verás que notas la diferencia.

Saludos y buen mapeo.
philippec (2024-02-18 18:09:08+00:00): Wat is de locatie van de AED bij de gendarmerie ?  Het kan best zijn dat de portier het niet weet. 
En waar is de ingang naar de AED ?
DeLorkGavere (2024-02-19 19:24:29+00:00): Op de site zelf aan de portierspost, restaurant en op de 5e verdieping. Maar deze zijn dus enkel te gebruiken binnen het terrein... Algemeen is bij het vast personeel wel geweten waar ze hangen.
philippec (2024-02-19 19:38:14+00:00): Zijn er dan drie ?  En kan je ze ongeveer mappen ?  Anders moeten ze niet in OSM staan.
Kennen ze bij de politie de wetgeving niet ?  Willen ze zich schuldig maken aan schuldig verzuim ?
DeLorkGavere (2024-02-19 19:46:12+00:00): Voor zover ik weet zijn er 3 ja. Op de kaart staat er verderop nog eentje, die kant kom ik nooit dus die kan ik niet bevestigen. 
Je kan niet zomaar op het domein, dus in die zin zijn ze niet toegankelijk voor externen. Ik veronderstel niet dat iemand die hulp zal weigeren te bieden indien nodig.
philippec (2024-02-28 16:15:09+00:00): In welk lokaal bevindt zich de gemapte ?
Ik denk dat die bij de portier al gemapt is, met location "aan de lift".
DeLorkGavere (2024-02-28 21:50:51+00:00): Die aan de portier is gemapt als 'gelijkvloers', en hangt niet in een lokaal.
philippec (2024-02-28 21:56:39+00:00): "Location" is niet bedoeld als lokaal, maar als een beschrijving van waar het hangt.  Alhoewel ik nu zie dat de osm wiki dat niet zo ziet.
NightH (2024-02-26 20:06:11+00:00): A https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1252059212 vonalra rá tudsz nézni? Valószínűleg lemaradtak a tagek.
itineris (2024-02-26 20:25:26+00:00): Igen, javítottam. Köszi!
h551w (2024-02-18 16:02:43+00:00): I also believe we should upgrade the existing segment between Chinden and State to trunk once Phase 2 (https://itdprojects.org/projects/sh16design/) is complete. I haven't changed the proposed=motorway tags on the Phase 3 segments Jarrardi added, since I think that's entirely accurate to how the entire highway between I-84 and State ought to be anyway once the entire ID-16 project is done
zby-cz (2024-02-18 16:08:45+00:00): Všechny climbing=* objekty by měly mít nadřazený tag `sport=climbing`.

via https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/1113#issuecomment-1937003835
HessoKaart (2024-02-18 16:17:54+00:00): Ik weet niet zeker of ik het helemaal goed heb gedaan gezien er op sommige relations stonden. Als er feedback is hoor ik dat graag!
Leo Slager (2024-02-18 20:53:53+00:00): PB verzonden
steveman1123 (2024-02-24 05:30:03+00:00): How were these roads found? ESRI imagery says this is still farm land as of May 2023
dvlpmnt (2024-02-28 14:31:14+00:00): Sentinel-2 imagery
steveman1123 (2024-02-28 14:40:41+00:00): I see it now. It looks like that may be the location of an upcoming solar farm
https://www.nexteraenergyresources.com/duane-arnold-solar/project-overview.html
joey_geoloog (2024-02-28 17:47:25+00:00): duplicate waterway has been removed in new changeset!
dogukanishere (2024-02-18 16:30:18+00:00): Onaylarınızı rica ederim.
Supaplex (2024-02-18 16:33:03+00:00): 水股->五股
mavl (2024-02-23 18:52:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 147818131, 147828921 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects].
felipeeugenio (2024-02-19 11:06:03+00:00): Hola
=odd significa impar, =even es para par. Le pusiste par a todo. Saludos
felipeeugenio (2024-02-19 11:08:08+00:00): impar a todo, perdón
BikePC (2024-02-23 19:59:56+00:00): Kan deze note dan nu dicht?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3971642#map=16/52.0619/4.4910&layers=N
eggie (2024-02-19 09:42:59+00:00): Dag Manneke,

Wat leesvoer over level=
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:level

Probeer steeds in de wiki te kijken wat mogelijk is. In het begin kost dat veel tijd, maar op een gegeven moment het je het paraat.

MVG
eggie
TrickyFoxy (2024-02-18 21:56:59+00:00): Точно в здании? 

Посмотрите также на специальное приложение для добавления гидрантов https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=at.jst.fireyak
marc__marc (2025-11-18 14:09:34+00:00): Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/51232764/history/8
you specify that the crossing is uncontrolled, meaning no traffic signal and in the same time you added the traffic signal https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/249697690
Regards,
Marc
eggie (2024-02-18 18:40:37+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback Het zou zomaar kunnen dat er een hek staat, maar dan kun je dat hek gewoon intekenen met barrier=gate locked=yes  access=no

en het pad intact laten.
Dus de vraag is wat is de status van het hek?
Ik zet het pad weer even terug.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-02-18 19:05:07+00:00): Wat leesvoer
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dgate

Een hek kan het beste op een 'knoop' getekend worden verbonden met het pad. 
Gr eggie
eggie (2024-02-19 10:10:16+00:00): Op recente foto's zie ik wel een afrastering, maar er is nog wel een opening in die afrastering.
eggie (2024-02-18 18:45:50+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback Het zou zomaar kunnen, maar hoe heb je dit gecheckt? 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
aixbrick (2024-02-18 20:02:37+00:00): Hello,
why are you changing highway=path/track... to footway/cycleway...? What is your source?
Regards
aixbrick (2024-02-18 20:03:40+00:00): Same question for https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147619703 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147582243.
Vitalii_D88 (2024-02-18 20:15:57+00:00): Hi
source is local knowlege 
i can show u the pictures of road signs 
besides, if u watch on the object #65411740, it is cycleway. That was torn with a part of a path. And then went into cycleway again. I think such mapping is not clear and make it more logical
aixbrick (2024-02-18 20:42:32+00:00): I would suggest to stop the retagging and to revert your edits, because I think you are not aware of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen_kartieren.
hw=cycleway is only used in case of sign 237 (which is very rare in Aachen), hw=footway for sign 239 or if the way is clearly intended for pedestrians (like a separately mapped sidewalk). All ways which are meant to be for bicycles and pedestrians should be tagged as hw=path, eventually with approbiate access-tags (bicycle/foot=designated).
For example: You changed https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/12689122 to highway=footway, but there are bicycle routes on it.
Other example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/12691813 was tagged correctly as hw=path which corresponds to the recommendation in my first link.
Vitalii_D88 (2024-02-19 15:23:27+00:00): Thanks for your comment, i will read this wiki to know the local details

I judged from osm logics i used to.

Can you revert this changes yourself because i have only browser now
aixbrick (2024-02-19 16:41:52+00:00): Reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147658664.
maraf24 (2024-02-26 22:04:40+00:00): To jest automated edit.
Czy przedyskutowałeś to wcześniej ze społecznością?
Jak sprawdziłeś, czy wartości w ref są wciąż aktualne?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct
emersonveenstra (2024-02-19 11:47:25+00:00): Hi there,

This revert deleted 82 of the 83 nodes of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/333579375, effectively deleting it from the map (visualization: https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/333579375) Looks like a user had edited the road between your initial changeset and revert and you failed to handle the revert conflict correctly. I've fixed it, but in the future please double check your edits (and there's no reason for mechanical edits to span more than one state at a time)
literan (2024-02-21 20:32:33+00:00): тег highway=track на маршруте лишний. Исправлю
cuzi (2024-02-25 19:50:36+00:00): Hat der Weg wirklich den Namen Trampelpfad oder ist das nur die Beschreibung?
GerdP (2025-11-13 07:32:58+00:00): Moin!
Du hast hier am Denkmalsweg https://www.osm.org/way/24058097
ein lanes=1 ergänzt. Warum?
BB-plan (2025-11-16 23:16:52+00:00): Denke, mir kam der Weg auf dem Abschnitt damals als extrem schmal vor. Vielleicht deshalb. Weiß ich nicht mehr genau. Kann aber übertrieben sein, deshalb dort 1 einzutragen. Hab's gelöscht.