piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Sun2306 (2025-12-24 08:34:34+00:00): Hello,

It's great that you are planning to visit the area again in the future, and I appreciate your commitment to balancing your dedication to the OSM dogma with the concerns of the various local communities (including mountain bikers) who use the infrastructure that you map. Your upcoming proposal for more MTB tags will doubtlessly help reduce these concerns.

In this particular case, safety concerns aside, I don't see how you can map the entity in question as a trail without many contradictions. It does not operate as a trail, nor as a path in any capacity. It is not a way that people use to move around; it cannot be followed or traversed.

I see three possible solutions:
1. Survey and see if there does exist a path here (since many collections of TTFs do have a path connecting them, but that is significantly different from the 'way' of the TTF, and might include tremendous variations as compared to the 'way'
2. Discontinue the way, and represent the area in question as a series of points of interest (probably the best choice; allows us to continue to host information about the area and its history without misleading map users)
3. Remove the area from the map altogether.

Best,
Sun2306
Sun2306 (2025-12-24 08:35:45+00:00): I will be proactive within a few days in carrying out solution 2.
eerib (2025-12-24 10:18:46+00:00): Hello Sun2306,

The issue you raised has been addressed in a myriad of community discussions. A useful starting point is the discussion titled "Documenting the problems with 'highway=path’"

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/documenting-the-problems-with-highway-path/119103/44

The trail in question, known as the Behemoth Line, is a pro-line mountain bike trail featuring cleared bedrock surfaces, ladder bridges, skinnies, and drops in a continuous line. Because it's a linear trail (or "line") and the fact that it has been successfully traversed, albeit only possible by highly experienced riders, is why it has been mapped using a way with the highway=path tag.

While your safety concerns are understood, the most effective course of action would be to contact the trail-building team directly and request that the trail be fully dismantled, rather than attempting to remove it from the OpenStreetMap database. Should they decline, you may escalate the matter by contacting the District Recreation Officer for the Sea to Sky Recreation District, who can forward your complaint to Compliance and Enforcement for investigation and removal. I would advise using the reporting function only as a last resort. Alternatively, you might consider engaging other mountain bike riders who may be willing to assist.

Bear in mind, the Squamish River Branch 200 permit road has two washed out culverts from the recent atmospheric river event. These conditions significantly limit access to the trail, further mitigating the safety concerns previously noted.

Thank you, eerib
M!dgard (2025-12-20 10:16:44+00:00): Vandalisme teruggedraaid in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176173549
M!dgard (2025-12-20 10:22:37+00:00): Teruggedraaid in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176173681

Postcodes en landinformatie hoeven in België niet toegevoegd te worden: die informatie wordt door datagebruikers gehaald uit de landgrens- en postcodecontouren.

Verder kunt u ook stoppen met adressen in Kortrijk te vandaliseren.
L'imaginaire (2025-12-20 10:35:02+00:00): Dag Wandelzot,
Dergelijke "massawijzigingen" bespreek je beter vooraf even met de Belgische community. Er zijn verschillende manieren om in contact te komen, het chatkanaal is de meest rechtstreekse, zie https://openstreetmap.be/contact.html

Ook voor andere vragen of advies zijn er heel wat andere mappers die je graag verder helpen.
NeisBot (2025-12-20 08:00:58+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13389700989 v1

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Clínica Dental Dr Dario Zerda"
---
Por ejemplo, una versión más neutral y objetiva de tu descripción podría ser: "Clínica Dental Dr Dario Zerda"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description
NeisBot (2025-12-30 06:33:38+00:00): 🔄 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the original contributor or remaining promotional text in description by https://osm.org/changeset/176612030
vrix (2025-12-22 06:51:28+00:00): Hey Satyajit Ray, I think your changes must have broken something, because now the Madrid relation can't be found on Nominatim anymore https://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/ui/search.html?q=R5326784

Please double check what's wrong and adjust
OrchidA (2025-12-20 00:22:24+00:00): Correction: Source used was Esri World Imagery, Kartaview
NorthCrab_upload (2025-12-22 14:01:52+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13389764389
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/198079983

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eggie (2025-12-20 07:23:38+00:00): https://openairportmap.org/EDKA#map=15.25/50.821676/6.184567

Wellicht ken je deze al.
In Duitsland zie ik meer details. Geen idee over de updates.
Gr eggie
bkleipool (2025-12-20 11:02:05+00:00): Hoi Eggie,
Het was me inderdaad ook al opgevallen dat ze in Duitsland veel meer details hebben in hun vliegvelden. Ik ben de laatste dagen ook bezig geweest om details toe te voegen op Nederlandse vliegvelden. Weet jij toevallig of er een project of forum is voor mensen die zich hiermee bezig houden?
Gr bkleipool
eggie (2025-12-20 11:48:04+00:00): Ik had aanvankelijk een Wiki gevonden en daar had in die openairportmap vandaan. Zal zo nog even zoeken.
Zou het ook aan Woodpeck (Frederik Ramm)  kunnen vragen https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Frederik_Ramm
Die geeft op de wiki over vliegvelden aan dat hij wel belangstelling heeft. 
Eens kijken of ik die wiki kan vinden, want niet alle links werken nog.
eggie (2025-12-20 11:50:32+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenAirportMap

en

https://openairportmap.org/EDDF#map=16/50.038670/8.554070
eggie (2025-12-20 11:52:40+00:00): En hier op het forum https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/announcement-openairportmap/8675
eggie (2025-12-20 11:58:06+00:00): Ik zie dat JeroenHoek ook participeert hier. Die kun je ook even vragen en anders de initiatiefnemer van de kaart dktue.
eggie (2025-12-20 12:01:03+00:00): Je kunt ook evt aanhaken in dit 'draadje' uit 2023
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/announcement-openairportmap/8675/80
bkleipool (2025-12-25 23:36:46+00:00): Bedankt voor de info!
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-12-20 00:51:55+00:00): Also, what's with that one-lane freeway located between the two carriageways of the 215? Is that a lane widening? HOV lanes? An "express" lane (as described on Wikipedia, for non-locals to drive with fewer exits)? A tollway? Something else? Does this even matter? (And why did I not request review... smh 🤦‍♂️)
jmaspons (2025-12-23 21:55:03+00:00): Hola. Veig que continues insistint a eliminar etiquetes sense justificació vàlida. Et recomano que expliquis que pretens aconseguir a la comunitat i mirem de buscar solucions correctes. Altrament, caldrà demanar que et bloquegin el compte.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176161940
InsertUser (2025-12-20 03:22:25+00:00): That shoud ahve said "Traced building from imagery".
jm428 (2025-12-20 17:11:33+00:00): Hi,
I think this changeset should be reverted. You deleted this way: https://www.osm.org/way/591277988
and extended a different road to replace it. This is an issue because the piece of road you deleted had tags that are specific to that section of road, such as the width tag and the bike lane tags. That section of road does not have any bike lane according to both bing streetside and the previous tagging, but you have replaced it with a road that says there is a bike lane.
cubbe8 (2025-12-20 17:21:46+00:00): fixed
jm428 (2025-12-20 20:05:26+00:00): Thanks! I noticed in a lot of your other changesets you were deleting roads and adding new ones, which is deleting the way history in addition to potentially causing problems like this one. Going forward, if possible could you edit existing ways instead of making new ones? Thanks
cubbe8 (2025-12-20 20:17:55+00:00): sound good
nevw (2025-12-20 04:10:09+00:00): I deleted your HArpley town Centre as it is already mapped correctly
fortera_au (2025-12-21 00:56:49+00:00): Is the new road actually named Ison Road Extension, or is it just an extension of Ison Road?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176163579
Ash739 (2025-12-21 02:54:08+00:00): Fortera it is the bridge
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176163579
fortera_au (2025-12-21 03:28:50+00:00): The name is what I'm asking about, because if Extension isn't what is signed or part of the actual name, it shouldn't be included.
NeisBot (2025-12-20 08:01:01+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13388573294 v4

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Insurance agency in Edmond"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description
NeisBot (2025-12-30 06:34:23+00:00): ❌ Fixed by https://osm.org/changeset/176270188
Thanks @ Baloo Uriza
mueschel (2025-12-21 10:34:03+00:00): Hi,
please don't add dozens of plain translations to name and address tags. The address of an object should be just the official address in the official language of the place (sometimes there are 2 or 3, but never more than 20).
The same goes for the name which should contain only official names in other languages, but no plain translations.
AnmiTaliDev (2025-12-21 15:57:50+00:00): @mueschel, Oh, I'm sorry, I didn't know
Joseph R P (2025-12-21 15:23:26+00:00): I'm a little confused with what the motorway ways with the sand surface are intended to represent. 

If these are under construction ways, I would either add no surface tag at all, since an under-construction road's surface changes rapidly based on the progress of the project, or add the surface of what the roadway will have when completed (e.g. asphalt, concrete).

If these are temporary alignments, considering that they are placed right beside the mainline carriageways of the freeway rather than them being a major diversion, I would just not map them.

When it comes to construction, it's better not to over-map it. Construction projects change rapidly in real time, in many cases faster than OSM data can be downloaded, so adding temporary dirt roads for construction vehicle access, minor realignments for traffic to bypass road work, overly-detailed tagging for what surface a way is, etc. can actually be counterintuitive by providing information that is bound to be outdated by the time routers and renderers receive this information.

The best course of action for a road interchange like this one would be to:

- delete anything that's been demolished
- change anything from highway=construction to a routable highway tag like motorway or motorway link when it's fully-accessible
- avoid mapping anything that's only temporary (like minor road realignments and track roads created by construction vehicles), unless it's a significant road realignment that is necessary for providing accurate routing (such as a lengthy or long-term detour). Same logic would apply with the hazard=roadworks tag. While documented, it's usage is discouraged for short-term construction subject to rapid real-world change.

Additionally, no road in this complex, complete or under-construction, should be tagged with any other sort of surface other than one that it's intended to be typically, which in this case would be something like asphalt, concrete, or simply paved. A surface like highway=sand on highway=motorway would imply an actual freeway made of sand, which would be quite absurd. For roads under construction, while a they're definitely going to be consistent of gravel, sand, dirt, etc. while being graded, the surface tag that should be used is the one that the road surface will truly be upon completion. The only case in which I'd use an unpaved surface tag like sand or dirt on an under-construction way would only happen in a less common instance like a hiking trail that's in the process of being officially marked.
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-12-21 17:36:58+00:00): Alright, I guess that makes sense. But here's the thing: I'm not actually sure if any of the new roads I just mapped are temporary or not (with respect to the construction timeline). The random track road I created linking Summerlin Parkway westbound to the freeway link is temporary for sure, but I'm not 100% sure if the "new" one-lane freeways that parallel the 215 are just temporary road construction bypasses or are indicative of a new project, such as "local" and "express" lanes, similar to what California does with its Interstates.
Joseph R P (2025-12-21 22:38:37+00:00): To my knowledge, there doesn't seem to be any sort of project like that happening on the 215. My guess, based on OpenWeb imagery, is that these are just temporarily walled-off shoulders for construction vehicle access and for workers to have a barricaded area to do work on the overpasses/pillars from the middle of the highway.
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-12-21 23:15:40+00:00): Oh, okay. In that case, should I just delete these "new" freeways since, according to you, they're just temporary?
Joseph R P (2025-12-21 23:20:29+00:00): Yes, I think so
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-12-22 03:09:17+00:00): Alright, will do!
NeisBot (2025-12-20 08:01:05+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/785731832 v2

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Apartamentos en Serena Village Punta Cana cerca de Playa Bávaro"
---
Por ejemplo, una versión más neutral y objetiva de tu descripción podría ser: "Apartamentos en Serena Village Punta Cana cerca de Playa Bávaro"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description
NeisBot (2025-12-30 07:57:00+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/176170444
phoenixsaigon1698 (2026-02-26 15:53:57+00:00): Why did you delete turn restriction for truck, private bus that BAN vehicle from Truong Dinh to Nguyen An Ninh?
Vmosnokia31 (2026-02-26 16:15:36+00:00): I'm very sorry, this was back when I didn't know how iD properly works and I messed it up. I honestly haven't noticed it.

Yes, I'm aware that there is a No private busses and trucks sign at where Nguyen An Ninh meet Truong Dinh (from Truong Dinh to  Nguyen An Ninh) since I drove pass here. This won't happen again.
phoenixsaigon1698 (2026-02-26 16:18:07+00:00): Thank you for your reply. Regarding Turn Restriction please always enable newest Mapillary StreetView or another window with StreetView.vn before create or delete a new one.
phoenixsaigon1698 (2026-02-26 16:20:35+00:00): if you have time please also use https://ahorn.lima-city.de/tr/ to QC check error turn restriction. and you can browse my profile, I wrote down lots of tools that I used when editing OSM.
Vmosnokia31 (2026-02-26 16:30:37+00:00): Thank you, I'll look into in.
NeisBot (2025-12-20 08:01:09+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/12803508162 v2

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Apartamentos en Serena Village Punta Cana cerca de Playa Bávaro"
---
Por ejemplo, una versión más neutral y objetiva de tu descripción podría ser: "Apartamentos en Serena Village Punta Cana cerca de Playa Bávaro"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description
NeisBot (2025-12-30 07:57:04+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/176170172
NeisBot (2025-12-20 08:01:12+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13390069182 v1

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Insurance agency"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description
NeisBot (2025-12-30 07:57:04+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/176168998
Thanks @ user_5359
DanielAgos (2025-12-22 16:12:19+00:00): Olá e Obrigado por realizar alterações no OSM

Uma vez que pediu por revisão, deixo algumas notas:

1. Nomes de ruas devem ser deixadas por extenso. Assim, Rua Dr. Eduardo Granada deve ficar Rua Doutor Eduardo Granada

2. Apesar de o iD sugerir as Ortophotos de 2018 como imagem aerea, existem outras mais recentes, como ortosat2023 e Esri World Imagery. Nesta ultima, a Rua Doutor Sousa Martins está ligeiramente diferente
Ed_slv (2025-12-22 19:48:32+00:00): Redesenhada a zona. Necessita confirmação das funções dos distintos edificios e se as ruas são de uso para o Campus (serviço) ou genéricas (residencial)
Comunicação Misericórdia Vila Franca de Xira (2025-12-22 20:34:24+00:00): Olá
Os nomes das ruas só são escritas por extenso relativamente a Dr. quando assim está indicado nas placas sinalizadoras das ruas, o que não é o caso. Possivelmente, porque o nome dos médicos visados não foram doutorados, mas apenas licenciados. Daí, a abreviatura Dr. estar correcta. 
Todas as ruas em redor do Campus de Saúde da Misericórdia Vila Franca de Xira têm nomes de médicos locais e todas elas são de serviço público. Nenhuma das ruas é privada.
Ed_slv (2025-12-22 23:42:07+00:00): No Openstreetmap não podemos usar abreviaturas. Dr tem de ser Doutor, Eng tem de ser engenheiro, prof tem de ser professor. Não fazemos distinções entre licenciados, bachareis, doutorados ou professor catedrático. D tem de estar por extenso como Dom,  Cap -> capitão Gen -> general etc
NeisBot (2025-12-20 08:01:16+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/11611617638 v3

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Apartamentos en Serena Village Punta Cana cerca de Playa Bávaro"
---
Por ejemplo, una versión más neutral y objetiva de tu descripción podría ser: "Apartamentos en Serena Village Punta Cana cerca de Playa Bávaro"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description
NeisBot (2025-12-30 07:57:05+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/176170377
NeisBot (2025-12-20 08:01:17+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13390285851 v1

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Allstate insurance office"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description
NeisBot (2025-12-30 07:57:06+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/176271432
Thanks @ Baloo Uriza
MxxCon (2025-12-21 03:33:35+00:00): Hello.
"How busy the bar is" would dictate when it closes, not when it opens..
The listed hours were taken from their website https://www.solasbar.com/location/solas-bar/ If those hours are old, they should've removed them from their website :/
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176168773
literan (2025-12-20 09:15:23+00:00): это и кафе,  им ясной магазин. Зачем вы удаляете тег мясного магазина?
literan (2025-12-20 09:15:52+00:00): там же даже на сайте видно, что они мясом торгуют
randomaper (2025-12-28 09:23:56+00:00): shop=butcher, не знал что его можно добавить на кафе. спасибо за уточнение
NeisBot (2025-12-20 08:01:19+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13390285989 v1

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "مرکز طب سوزنی"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description
NeisBot (2025-12-30 09:03:24+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/176616507
(Deleted leftover after several edits) 🤖
eggie (2025-12-20 15:17:24+00:00): Hoi..  Je vraagt feedback.

Je zou specifiek kunnen taggen. Dus building=shed ipv yes

MVG
eggie
NeisBot (2025-12-20 08:01:20+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13390342822 v1

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Insurance agency"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description
NeisBot (2025-12-30 08:06:07+00:00): 🗑️ Element deleted by https://osm.org/changeset/176175785
Thanks @ mueschel