piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Crsi (2023-02-17 11:36:52+00:00): Hallo Beregbua,
soweit sehen deine Änderungen korrekt aus. Worin besteht denn dein Zweifel, dann kann ich vielleicht gezielter weiterhelfen?
Shaun das Schaf (2023-02-17 20:57:58+00:00): Hallo Beregbua,

was mir aufgefallen ist: Du hast den Namen des Gebäudes von "e23" auf "23" geändert.

Richtig wäre es, den Namen komplett zu entfernen. Das Gebäude hat zwar die Hausnummer "23", aber bestimmt nicht den Namen "23".

Viele Grüße
Shaun das Schaf
gscholz (2023-02-20 06:00:18+00:00): Hi abebayehuz,
this changeset has added several errrors to the OSM database regarding duplicate nodes. The added line also does not have any meaning for the map itself, can you please fix this?

You may like to educate yourself about how to handle personal gps tracks here:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Convert_GPS_tracks

Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2023-02-21 06:51:16+00:00): Hi abebayehuz, 
due to your missing response I have reverted this changeset now to fix those issues.
Guido
mcliquid (2023-02-20 12:38:32+00:00): Hi, das Hotel existiert schon zwei Meter weiter. Wieso der doppelte Eintrag?
Frans S (2023-02-17 12:18:29+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
Your mappings are rather accurate. Please square each rectangular building with the Q key.
A remark about tagging a road as highway='service'
In urban areas, most roads need to be tagged as residential.
See this wiki where you can tag highways as "service"
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dservice
Best regards and keep mapping
AlbaireN (2025-01-19 18:48:50+00:00): Why creating a cycleway whereas there is clearly no cycleway there ???
thimbleu (2025-01-19 23:21:19+00:00): I have not created the relation cycle route EV4 but have withdrawn my removal of that relation (132668548). 
If you look at the stripes on the outer edge of the road, which are demarcated with a white line, on BDOrtho IGN or Mapbox at 10 m zoom, you can see the cyclist symbols on the asphalt. They can also be seen on street images from October 2023.
Therefore, I have undone my changes and left the previous state.
AlbaireN (2025-01-19 23:38:57+00:00): Yes but they are clearly not cycleways but mere cycle lanes and therefore must be tagged with the motor highways where they are painted on.
thimbleu (2025-01-20 08:44:38+00:00): Yes, you're right.
DressyPear4 (2023-02-17 19:19:55+00:00): Por que você está deletando tudo é refazendo novamente?
Percebeu a quantidade de erros que isso está causando?
Raquel Dezidério Souto (2023-02-18 14:37:03+00:00): You can't delete what other people did before. Read how to map in OSM in its documentation, please.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132670883
user_12421087 (2023-02-17 13:00:01+00:00): Put it back for 24 hours please.  I spend time trying to restore these closed golf courses so people can still enjoy them on a simulator. I dont care if they are permanent but I just spent two hours doing this and the servers require a few hours to make changes in order to export.
emersonveenstra (2023-02-17 13:06:06+00:00): Sorry, but that's not allowed in OSM. If it doesn't exist anymore, it's not going to be mapped.
user_12421087 (2023-02-17 13:13:41+00:00): You know what else is not appropriate, removing other people work!!!!  Its not up to you to agree why I am doing this. Its called open street maps for a reason.  Start your own where you get to be Sherriff.
emersonveenstra (2023-02-17 13:21:56+00:00): You're right, it's not up to me, it's up to the broader OSM community, and they've very explicitly said it is forbidden to map things that no longer exist: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_map_historic_events_and_historic_features
ZeLonewolf (2023-02-17 15:58:06+00:00): Please do not vandalism OSM for your golf game.
Woazboat (2023-02-17 16:00:36+00:00): Finding, reporting and fixing vandalism IS the responsibility of all OSM contributors and that includes @emersonveenstra.

If your changes violate the established mapping practice, they shouldn't be in OSM. That includes 'temporary' changes(/vandalism) to the shared global map just so you can import the data for some game. If you want to do that, make your changes to a local file and import that.
marczoutendijk (2023-02-17 16:42:56+00:00): The DWG had received a vandalism report from this user which made me explain to them that they were behaving wrong by restoring (long gone) golf courses to facilitate their golf simulators.
The user deleted their account.

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-17 12:00:21+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1146985048

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
streckenkundler (2023-09-12 15:54:43+00:00): Hei,

Im Forum gibt es einen Beitragsfaden zum Thema D10 (linkselbisch): https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/elbradweg-d10-zwei-relationen-fur-eine-route/103750/2

Das Problem, was wir nun haben: Es gibt eine zweite, wesentlich ältere linkselbische D10-Radroute: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/22328, die sich mehrheitlich kaum unterscheiden. Die ältere ist auch in Abschitte unterteilt, was das Ganze bearbeitbar macht, im Gegensatz zu dieser Einzelrelation.

Es wäre schön, wenn du dich an der Forensdisskussion beteiligen würdest..

streckenkundler
mavl (2023-04-25 09:11:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
Discostu36 (2023-09-10 06:33:08+00:00): Bitte sorgfältiger arbeiten, keine Gartenfläche, die mit Gebäuden überlappt.
aceman444 (2025-03-16 17:32:15+00:00): Hi, you do not need to cut roundabouts into individual segments if they have the same properties along the whole circle. You do not need to do it for public transport relations.
zokert (2025-03-16 19:54:31+00:00): Hi!
If I don't break the roundabout, the bus routes that run there will go around the entire roundabout and this is very confusing when looking at the map. In the link below, OSM writes that it is not forbidden to break up roundabouts.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Droundabout#cite_ref-1
"The roundabout itself
Shape: Most editors have a tool to create a circle. (see below)As usual with all roads: split the roundabout as necessary for tagging different properties or route relations or other relations.Note that route relation such as bus relations are added sometimes with entire roundabout without splitting it, that is also fine but splitting it is also fine and there is no consensus which is preferable[1]"

There is a similar opinion on this forum:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mapping-q-relation-which-uses-part-of-roundabout/48282

The Hungarian Openstreetmap Wiki specifically states that the roundabout must be broken if a connection only uses part of the roundabout.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hungary/T%C3%B6megk%C3%B6zleked%C3%A9s
 "A tömegközlekedés folyamatát jellemzi.

Kapcsolatot hozunk létre az egyes viszonylatokhoz külön-külön, amely összefogja a viszonylat irányainak kapcsolatait (lásd alább).
Kapcsolatot hozunk létre a viszonylatok irányaihoz külön-külön, amely sorrendben tartalmazza azokat az útszakaszokat, amelyeken az adott járat keresztülhalad, majd ezután szintén sorrendben tartalmazza a járat megállóhelyeinek kapcsolatait, illetve ennek hiányában a megállási vagy hozzáférési pontjait.
Az útvonalnak folyamatosnak kell lennie. Ha az útvonal körforgalmon halad át, akkor azt meg kell törni."
(It characterizes the process of public transport.

We create a connection for each route separately, which brings together the connections of the directions of the route (see below).

We create a connection for the directions of the routes separately, which contains in order the road sections that the given route passes through, and then also contains in order the connections of the stops of the route, or in the absence of such, the stopping or access points.

The route must be continuous. If the route passes through a roundabout, it must be broken.)

That's why I will continue to break roundabouts if public transport or other connections require it.
aceman444 (2025-03-16 20:24:05+00:00): See, splitting or not splitting the roundabout is both fine :)

I do not see a problem is whole roundabout is part of the route relation. Also JOSM editor sees no problem.

But the will become a problem if route contains a roundabout and then some other user splits the roundabout and does not fix the route relations afterwards.
Baloo Uriza (2023-02-17 20:33:33+00:00): Nice catch, wonder how I missed that when I was updating the intersection.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132672216
Msiipola (2024-12-23 14:10:55+00:00): Hej! Angående fixme du adderat för wikidata. Det finns wikidata-info, som verkar peka på korrekt data i wikidata. Var det något annat du tänkte på? Om inte, så kan väl fixme-taggen tas bort?
Frans S (2023-03-17 14:56:56+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings not accurate mapped and squared.
Connected nodes of buildings to each other



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132672400
mavl (2023-04-25 09:09:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
Frans S (2023-02-17 12:40:26+00:00): Hello.  
I understand that you are eager to map as much as possible objects.
However, please keep yourself to the objects mentioned in the instructions.
Please solve also the issues, which you must have seen (Error Triangle) before you upload your work.
Best regards and keep mapping
ScotsRob (2023-05-12 10:26:59+00:00): This change seems to have left the huge heath area unbounded - this causes corruption in my GPS device and associated software
Could you close the area?
Grove11 (2023-05-12 11:32:52+00:00): I don't think the heath area is unbounded, but https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131613865 did break up the outer parts of the relation. This might be fixable by downloading the Rigside area into the software?
Frans S (2023-03-03 14:44:15+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, during the validation process
I noticed that you are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.
We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. Just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.
Please map each building accurate over the rooflines.
Square each rectangular building with the Q key.
Nodes of buildings may NOT  connect to other buildings or features.
The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 
Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132672977
Frans S (2023-02-17 12:33:48+00:00): Hello. Thank you so much for mapping on this project, and we welcome you as a new mapped.
A remark, You mapped a number of tracks in farmland. Please read the notes about mapping tracks on the instructions.
quote:
Some mapping hints to map roads
Please don’t spend time on mapping traces leading to, and ending in farmland. Focus on through roads (most tagged unclassified).
end of quote
Best regards and keep mapping.
SekeRob (2023-02-17 17:16:14+00:00): HGi,

1) Whatever you did, you created an impossible oneway situation somewhere per the change set summary above.

2) Bing has a large image offset. Best when you go visit a place and start mapping and correcting, use the same image base so everything is aligned, not a street section with ESRI (little offset), then ESRI Clarity (large offset and outdated), and Bing, best resoluton but also suffering large offset). You can check with the selected object which image set was used with the last change set modification.

3) When starting mapping the best thing to do is map in your local area that you know and can survey, not jump around a planet.

ciao
SekeRob (2023-02-17 17:56:48+00:00): OK, so the roundabout you mapped here at start of Via Martiri Delle Foibe is not one that I know since the centre is only painted i.e. traversable. Think it was a mini-roundabout before so your edit needs reversal. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=mini_roundabout. 

ciao
andrei_ptk (2023-02-20 11:27:33+00:00): Hello. I am very grateful for your comment. I actually made a mistake in this changeset. I reverted all changes back to original state.
This is the link where you can find the new changeset:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132783254#map=18/42.41191/14.29847
I am very attentive to the comments from the community, I will try to be more attentive to the changes that I make in the future.
Best regards.
forstarters (2023-02-17 14:45:35+00:00): This is a duplicate. The already existing node (1567316538) is more precise
gscholz (2023-02-21 06:53:59+00:00): Hi abebayehuz,
this changeset has added several errors to the OSM database regarding duplicate nodes. The added line also does not have any meaning for the map itself, can you please fix this?

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=132674031

You may like to educate yourself about how to handle personal gps tracks here:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Convert_GPS_tracks

Kind regards
Guido
ivanbranco (2023-02-20 21:14:56+00:00): Hi Zam278,

I noticed you are adding a lot of invalid place values, such as gas station, atm, mosque, supermarket, shopping center, bank, Vacant plot ecc.

please notice that the place=* tag is to tag places such as towns, cities, neighbourhoods ecc.

could you fix them?
PT-53 (2023-02-18 06:49:39+00:00): charge=10 € am Automat stand 02.2023
entspricht nicht dem Wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:charge?uselang=de
PT-53 (2023-03-05 11:54:19+00:00): Hallo deprado63,
es wäre schön, wenn Du Deine Eingaben noch berichtigen würdest.
Grüße
PT-53 (2023-04-09 06:59:30+00:00): Keine Reaktion > falsche charge-Eingabe gelöscht
PT-53 (2023-02-18 06:47:36+00:00): Hallo deprado63,
shop=ticket
für einen Parkscheinautomaten ist wohl nicht genz passend:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:shop=ticket?uselang=de

Schau bitte hier mal nach:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dvending_machine
Grüße
PT-53 (2023-03-05 11:54:53+00:00): Hallo deprado63,
es wäre schön, wenn Du Deine Eingaben noch berichtigen würdest.
Grüße
PT-53 (2023-03-22 08:48:40+00:00): Falschen Eintrag gelöscht
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-17 13:10:23+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9082527878
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/672149331

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-17 13:10:21+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/272997362
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1147002836

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
micheleOSM3 (2023-09-19 12:40:33+00:00): Hi, I see that the way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1147005573 has ref=422 and also belongs to a relation with ref=421.
Maybe we need to create a relation with ref=422 that brings together all the ways with ref=422?
metjowagner (2023-09-19 14:50:32+00:00): Thanks for the comment! hikingtrail 422 no longer exists. Therefore I removed ref=422. Hiking trail 421 exists, the relation is correct. In the future hiking trails should be maped als relations instead of ways with attribute ref=... .
hoancat (2023-02-20 10:40:48+00:00): Bonjour,
J'ai changé votre tag pour le mas El Mallol.
Le tag building=house est réservé au bâti.
J'ai utilisé un noeud avec un tag place=isolated_dwelling qui correspond aux mas/fermes isolées.
Cordialement,
Hoancat
b-holdet (2023-02-25 21:11:31+00:00): Hedder kirken nu "Idom Åvej"??
LarsBG (2023-02-27 16:00:30+00:00): Nej det var en fejl under editing.
Andrea Musuruane (2023-02-17 17:47:59+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto su OSM. In questo changeset purtroppo vedo solo problemi. Hai cancellato un post_box. Poi hai spostato un numero civico dalla posizione corretta nella posizione dove prima c'era il post_box e ci hai aggiunto il tag amenity=post_box. Hai inserito un nodo con name="via Vittorio Emanuele", che non ha alcun senso. Infine hai aggiunto material=pietra a un memorial, dove però pietra non è un valore ammissibile. Faccio revert. Ciao, Andrea
ivanbranco (2023-03-14 18:49:53+00:00): Hi Vera_D,

"If there are several roads of different importance connecting to the roundabout, you should usually use the highway=* value with the greatest importance, that does not begin/end at the roundabout."

in this case the greatest importance was =primary, not =unclassified, I fixed it.
Vera_D (2023-03-15 08:12:51+00:00): Hi ivanbranco!
Thank you for your attention and for pointing out this inaccuracy! I will be more careful! Have a good day)
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-06 23:46:24+00:00): Remove SEO spam description=*, replace non-existent top-level tags, fix other tags and align and tag building in changeset 183759411

https://osm.org/changeset/183759411
Frans S (2023-02-23 14:54:42+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
Please do not cluster buildings, but map each building individually. And... don't forget to square each rectangular building
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2023-03-08 14:40:21+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, during the validation process
I noticed that you are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.
We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. Just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.
Please map each building accurate over the rooflines.
Square each rectangular building with the Q key.
Nodes of buildings may NOT  connect to other buildings or features.
The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 
Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.




See also this documenthttps://drive.google.com/file/d/11PsAW0bzUZHbS8YnbaFzqOYhJY7tSPYG/view?usp=share_link


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132677191
hoancat (2023-02-20 10:23:38+00:00): Bonjour,
J'ai corrigé certaines de vos erreurs :
- Le parking de la place du 8 mai 1945 était déjà renseigné, pas besoin de faire un doublon.
- Le conteneur de recyclage a pour tags amenity=recycling et recycling_type=container suivi des tags recycling:paper=yes, etc.
- Le tag cemetery=sector sert à séparer les parties d'un cimetière, par exemple carré A, carré B. Ici le noeud n'avait pas sa place, je l'ai supprimé.
- J'ai passé le noeud leisure=park devant la Halle des Sports à une zone, plus appropriée dans ce contexte.
Cordialement,
Hoancat
adrianojbr (2023-02-24 23:05:22+00:00): Olá, Eduarda!

Acho que que pub é mais adequado e removi a especialidade médica que se referia à função antiga do ponto.

Abraço!
hoancat (2023-02-20 10:32:35+00:00): Bonjour,
J'ai modifié certaines de vos contributions en utilisant des tags plus appropriés.
Le tag operator="chateau d'eau" n'était pas approprié ni utile car il y a déjà man_made=water_tower, je l'ai supprimé.
En revanche, je ne comprends pas pourquoi avoir changé https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/342930957 en leisure=park.
Cordialement,
Hoancat
hoancat (2023-02-20 10:42:12+00:00): Aussi, j'ai passé le tag de la médiathèque en amenity=library correspondant aux bibliothèques, le tag shop=books étant réservé aux magasins vendant des livres.
DressyPear4 (2023-02-18 09:25:47+00:00): Olá, "amenity_1,2,3..." não são tags válidas, building corresponde apenas o contorno das edificações e não a área toda.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132677578
gscholz (2023-02-21 07:02:07+00:00): Hi abebayehuz,
this changeset has added several errors to the OSM database regarding duplicate nodes and self intersecting ways. The added line also does not have any meaning for the map itself, can you please fix this?

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=132677623

You may like to educate yourself about how to handle personal gps tracks here:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Convert_GPS_tracks

You can find information about how to write changeset comments properly here:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Kind regards
Guido
hoancat (2023-02-20 10:29:06+00:00): Bonjour,
J'ai repéré certaines de vos erreurs :
- Pour Le Bon Temps, le tag cuisine=divers ne correspond à rien dans le wiki. J'ai donc supprimé ce tag.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cuisine
- Vous avez modifié le noeud Molitg-les-Bains en rajoutant des tags inutiles liés aux bus, network=Sankéo , route=bus, etc. et en modifiant le lien wikipédia, ce que Garmin-User a corrigé. Molitg-les-Bains est une commune donc ses attributs se réfèrent à la commune, pas aux stations thermales.
Cordialement,
Hoancat
Harfeur (2023-02-20 07:53:43+00:00): Bonjour ! Pour cartographier un chemin qui passe à travers un bâtiment, il est préférable d'utiliser le tag tunnel=building_passage sur le chemin sous le bâtiment, au lieu d'utiliser layer=1 sur le bâtiment.

Voir ici pour le changement : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1147834218

~Harfeur
SekeRob (2023-02-17 18:21:08+00:00): Hi,

Per my previous message on the Francavilla mini-roundabout you changed to full roundabout, this one you mapped in Castel Frentano is also a mini-roundabout:  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=mini_roundabout

ciao
andrei_ptk (2023-02-20 11:28:03+00:00): Hello. My changes based on the Bing streetside photos from 9/10/2020 and the KartaView photos from 23/06/2021. Also I used the Bing satellite photos to make a geometry of the roundabout. 
It's very important for me to not make wrong changes, that's why I'm very attentive to your comment. Thanks for your feedback.
Best regards.