piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
bart 1962 kerkhof (2023-11-09 12:02:16+00:00): Je had het al goed aangepast, ik heb alleen nog een stukje straat verwijderd. in het midden van het Da Costaplein is het nu 1 groot grasveld. Is het mogelijk om een wms achter de openstreetmap te leggen. Ik maak de BGT en meet als landmeter alle wijzigingen in buiten en verwerk ze in de BGT. Via de PDOK viewer kun je de BGT raadplegen. WMS van de BGT is 
https://service.pdok.nl/lv/bgt/wmts/v1_0?request=GetCapabilities&service=WMTS

groet Bart
eggie (2023-11-09 12:46:20+00:00): Oke... Dan toch nog even kijken naar dat stukje Tollensstraat dat ik heb ingetekend. Ik kon niet goed zien of dat nog bestaat. Wellicht hoort die Tollensstraat niet op de kaart of is het nu een pad?

Je kunt het best omschakelen naar editor JOSM
WMS en WMTS  zijn beide mogelijk. De BGT omtrekgericht kun je in JOSM gewoon als layer gebruiken op de achtergrond. 

 
editor josm stap voor stap 

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/editor-josm-stap-voor-stap/75047 

 

BGT implementeren  

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59021 

Forumdraadje ..  De beste imagery layers om NL OSM te mappen met JOSM. 

Https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=64644 

In editor iD kun je die link evt proberen door 'm bij de achtergronden als link in te plakken. , maar ik heb met editor geen ervaring. 
Het beklijft in ieder geval niet, want je bent je instellingen na afsluiting weer kwijt. 
De meeste mappers gebruiken editor JOSM.


Succes,
eggie
eggie (2023-11-09 12:51:39+00:00): Stukje Tollensstraat omgezet naar highway=path. Geen idee of dat ook Tolensstraat heet. Wellicht is het pad er ook  niet. 
Mi
Denk toch dat je updates niet doorkomen, want die Tollensstraat liep nog over dat veld.
Gr eggie
slice0 (2023-11-13 22:09:51+00:00): im reporting this chageset, links are determined by the road they are connecting to, if a link is going to a secondary road it is a secondary link
fortera_au (2023-11-13 22:12:29+00:00): My understanding is that it’s the highest grade road that it is linked to, as mentioned on the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_link
zorglubu (2023-11-09 12:52:19+00:00): Thank you for your contribution.
Do you know that using "Q" key (or right click) , you can get a perfect square ?

Merci pour ta contribution. Sais-tu qu'avec la touche "Q" (ou clic droit) tu peux obtenir un carré parfait ?

Bonne cartographie !
Nietram (2023-11-09 14:32:36+00:00): Hello, thx for the information. I didn't know it. I just found out that O make a circle, thx again for the information. 

Merci de l'information, je ne le savais pas. J'ai également découvert que le O fait un cercle, merci encore

Have a nice day/Bonne journée
tomhukins (2025-04-21 09:59:34+00:00): Thank you for your helpful work improving the map.

I notice you have tagged the service road at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1222211042 as "access=customers" but the car park that it forms part of at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/768586253 has very few tags.

It would be helpful to add more descriptive tags such as "access" to the car park itself.

Again, thank you for your good work.
highflyer74 (2023-11-10 08:27:55+00:00): Moin nochmal!

Hier wurden Adressen von Essel auf Kutenholz geändert. Bitte gib an, warum diese Änderung stattfand. Was ist der Hintergrund? Und: ist das wirklich die korrekte postalische Ortsbezeichnung?

OSM setzt auf maximale Transparenz und Kommunikation. Schau dir deshalb bitte einmal folgende Links an:

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice

Danke!
Anzeiger Verlag GmbH (2023-11-10 08:41:27+00:00): Essel ist ein Ortsteil der Gemeinde Kutenholz (weitere Ortsteile: Aspe, Essel, Mulsum und Kutenholz). Der Bewohner in Essel, der sich bei uns gemeldet hat, hat selber angegeben, dass er in Kutenholz wohnt....
highflyer74 (2023-11-10 09:10:43+00:00): Hallo und danke für die schnelle Rückmeldung.

In OSM werden postalische Adressen erfasst. Mit anderen Worten: was würde man als Adresse auf einen Brief schreiben, wenn man ihn dort hinschickt.

Unabhängig davon gibt es für Ortsteile das Tag addr:suburb=*, welches hier ggf. in Frage kommt.

Das wäre dann aber eine Frage, die man für den/die ganzen Ort(steile) klären müsste. Dazu braucht man Ortskenntnis (die ich nicht habe).

Die Änderung einer einzelnen Adresse bringt hier nichts. Jetzt gibt es hier zwei Adressen mit Kutenholz als Ortsbezeichnung und der Rest hat Essel. Das bringt an anderer Stelle (auf Seiten der Datennutzer) Dinge durcheinander.

Sinnvoller wäre es, den vorherigen Änderungssatz zu kommentieren, in der der Ort gesetzt wurde (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/75126778/history).

Es wäre auch möglich, im Forum (https://community.openstreetmap.org/) nach Hilfe zu fragen. Vielleicht gibt es dort Leute, die in der Ecke wohnen.

Das ist mehr Arbeit, aber wir legen bei OSM sehr viel Wert auf Genauigkeit und nehmen Änderungen nur vor, wenn sie als gesichert gelten. Da ihr noch nicht so viele Änderungen in OSM vorgenommen habt, könnt ihr das nicht wissen, deshalb der Hinweis :-)

Ich gehe davon aus, dass ihr als Firma in OSM tätig seid. Könntet ihr zum Zwecke der Transparenz euer Profil noch ein wenig mit Leben füllen und mit Kontaktdaten versehen? Das ist für kommerzielle Accounts so vorgesehen und hilft uns im Falle von Qualitätsproblemen schnell in Kontakt zu kommen.

Generell gilt, Verbesserungen sind willkommen, aber OSM ist recht komplex und bedarf ein wenig Einarbeitung. Im Zweifel: immer fragen (siehe Forum oben).

Viele Grüße!
Anzeiger Verlag GmbH (2023-11-10 09:17:16+00:00): Vielen Dank für den Hinweis, wir arbeiten tatsächlich neu in der Pflege der Daten :-) Ich ändere unseren Datensatz jetzt auf Essel. Müssen wir das auch noch für OpenStreetMap wieder rückgängig machen?
highflyer74 (2023-11-10 09:28:11+00:00): Ich kann die Ortsänderungen wieder rückgängig machen.

Wie gesagt: was wirklich richtig ist, müsst ihr anderweitig klären. Viele Dinge ändern sich auch ggf im Laufe der Zeit durch Eingemeindungen etc.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-06 17:19:27+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5096754477/history has nature = tree that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
Was it supposed to be natural=tree? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dtree (though maybe it is not a tree anymore?)
Duja (2024-03-12 13:22:43+00:00): A što ste sad te bočne ulice prekrstili u living_street? Ako nema eksplicitnog saobraćajnog znaka, treba da ostanu residential.
Savo25656 (2024-03-12 19:07:06+00:00): Zapravo, potpuno neverovatno, tu na par ulica postoje eksplicitani znakovi za living_street koje sam čak i uslikao negdje u januaru. Ulice Oborac i Staza zdravlja čak ovako potpuno nelogično da se living_street završava pre Termi.
Duja (2024-03-13 08:35:08+00:00): Ah ok, nisam očekivao. Neki dan sam počistio pedesetak living streetova sa sokaka na Banstolu (za koje znam da nisu), pa sam pomislio da se trend proširio i ovde. Pozdrav.
Savo25656 (2024-03-13 09:29:10+00:00): Hvala ti za taj Banostol, ja zaista nema srca da označim zemljani sokak sa desetak vikendica u kojem se deca igraju i kola se ne mogu mimoići, kao normalan put u kojem je dozvoljeno kretati se 50 km/h. Na to, da living_street treba označavati samo ako postoji znak gledam više kao smernice, bar dok se ne pronađe validan službeni izvor koji je moguće povezati sa OSM. A i u realnosti ovo sa Stazom zdravlja u Vrdniku, nema smisla, okolo tog puta nema ničega, vinograde su iskrčili, tuda prolazi gradski autobus i baš to parče su označili znakom, valjda se spremaju za izgradnju apratmanskog naselja.
Duja (2024-03-13 09:42:10+00:00): Ja te baš bezimene slepe sokake uglavnom tagujem sa service=alley, ali ovi na Banstolu su imenovani i zvanično su ulice. Ruku na srce, i nema puno razlike je li residential, alley ili living_street, ruter će te tuda uputiti samo ako si baš tamo krenuo (ili ideš peške).
Savo25656 (2024-03-13 11:13:08+00:00): Kad se krene od Banostola i Stražilova prema Karlovcima, postoji dosta highway=track, koji sad već imaju zvanično ime, vidim da ih povezuju i sa RGZ. Kako su tagovani u OSM (neodržavani poljski put) nikako ne odgovara. Prosto me vuče da im stavim living_street, možda je zaista najbolje service=alley?
Duja (2024-03-13 11:47:07+00:00): A otkud znam, to je baš malo odokativno. Evo upravo sređujem okolinu Kanjiže, sličan problem - 5 km prašnjavog puta kroz njive, ima ime i RGZ, i usput 5 napuštenih salaša. Ja bih ostavljao track tamo gde je primarna namena poljoprivredna. Evo npr ovaj Lovački put, ovaj deo uz magistralu bih klasifikovao kao residential a ostatak ostavio track.
4004 (2023-11-11 23:25:19+00:00): 
Добрый день, спасибо за правку.
советую вам пройти обучение в редакторе - там обьясняют, например, как спрямлять углы в домах.
В название пишем только именна собственные - кажется, частный пруд это не название
Xvtn (2023-12-13 23:36:23+00:00): It looks like this is either severely misplaced or spam. Zuri, can you give some more info or comment on that?
ivanbranco (2023-11-10 13:05:22+00:00): Ciao, ti avevo richiesto per favore di astenerti da ulteriori modifiche del genere prima di aver intrapreso una discussione con gli utenti che ti hanno commentato le modifiche: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=25132

Col beneficio del dubbio che tu non stia controllando la tua email (in cui ti vengono notificati i commenti), ti linkerò la lista dei commenti per messaggio privato, così che tu possa vedere il numerino dei messaggi in alto a destra direttamente sul sito principale. Se anche dopo ciò continuerai a non rispondere e continuerai a revertare, sarò costretto a segnalarti per un 0-hour block.
s141739 (2023-11-11 21:12:42+00:00): Ciao,
no non avevo visto i messaggi né avevo ricevuto qualsivoglia avviso, pertanto ti ringrazio. Ho visto le regole e mi atterrò a quelle.
Avrei rimostranze sul fatto che città dotate di porti e aeroporti internazionali -ma non solo- siano sicuramente degni di nota pur senza status di capoluogo che non aggiunge né toglie niente (mi vengono in mente Civitavecchia, Lamezia Terme e Alghero) ma questo non è il luogo giusto in cui discuterne.
Rimane il fatto che Vercelli e Biella non rispettano i requisiti del tag=city, quindi quella modifica, che non farò per evitare ripercussioni personali, andrebbe ripristinata col tag=town.
tastrax (2023-11-09 21:36:46+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features  - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
Warin61 (2023-11-12 02:27:47+00:00): Hi,
Nodes 10233008384 and 10233008383 restored to previous position. Parking was otherwise out of kilter.
YPGGUUY (2023-11-18 15:55:25+00:00): If you are really unsatisfied with the unclosed border, you can temporarily move them out of relation. But you don't have to delete the whole relation, do you?
habi (2023-11-21 16:34:57+00:00): Ciao TiNiP_bkg
Ich denke nicht, dass das Gebäude `name=ehemalige Schule` hat.
Ich würde den deskriptiven Namen entfernen, die Tags des Gebäude weisen ja darauf hin, dass es ein Schulgebäude ist.
Gruss,
habi
Vinber-Pro (2023-11-11 10:20:59+00:00): bonjour,
j'ai l'impression que l'arrêt de bus a été déplacé au milieu de la route, c'est une erreur non ?

à plus
Metzor (2023-11-10 14:25:15+00:00): Hallo EtF vom Bundesamt für Kartographie und Geodäsie!

Schön, dass Du/ihr hier mitmacht :-)

In diesem Änderungssatz hast du - obwohl du bloß in Münzesheim was verbessern wolltest - leider auch einen Fußweg in Pforzheim verschoben, was einen hässlichen Knick in einem secondary highway erzeugte, siehe hier:
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=143819428#20/48.89078/8.70945

Ich hab das repariert:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143865518

Passiert jedem mal... Mir auch. Ich schaue immer, nicht zu viele Daten runter zu laden. Was man nicht hat, kann man auch nicht versehentlich verschieben...

Fröhliches Weitermappen!
Metzor
dentonny (2023-12-03 22:16:12+00:00): Dag susvh, 

mag ik vragen waarom u volgend gebouw verwijderd hebt?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/136412899/history

mvg
dentonny
Udarian (2023-11-10 21:44:06+00:00): when adding stop signs a better commit message would be "added stop sign" since you didn't change the alignment and because it better describes what was actually done in the commit.
pachpora (2023-11-13 10:18:38+00:00): Hi Udarian,
Thank you for going through the edit and reviewing the changeset.  Apologies for the confusion caused by the incorrect changeset comment, we will be more careful going forward, thank you.

Regards,
pachpora
felipeeugenio (2023-11-09 13:38:59+00:00): Hola. buenos días.
Ojo con rectificar el mapa mirando una foto satelital específica. En verdad no sabemos a ciencia cierta cual es la foto correcta. y en unos meses puede que la actualicen y alguien va a cambiarla otra vez y es una cadena de rectificaciones que nunca se va a acabar. 
Existe sin embargo una técnica que hemos estado implementando ultimamente usando trazas strava. Es un poco complicado de de explicar por este medio, pero dejamos todo el instructivo en un chat de Telegram (app similar a whatsapp) y puede verla en el link: https://t.me/OSMcl. Ahi le podemos explicar sin ningún problema si acaso está interesado.
saludos
probo (2023-11-10 11:56:23+00:00): Usamos como base para las rectificaciones topografía que estamos levantando en el terreno. Si quieres más detalle me puedes contactar por interno. Saludos.
felipeeugenio (2023-11-11 13:57:33+00:00): Hola, gracias por responder.
Igual por favor, para ciudades completas, consultar con la comunidad, porque las rectificaciones masivas han probado ser un caos completo.
Saludos.
Hufkratzer (2023-11-09 23:06:19+00:00): Hi,
The indoor arena is a building and should have a building tag (building=*), otherwise it will not be rendered as a building. The tag leisure=horse_riding is not a building tag, it is for complete riding centres, in this case it would be appropriate for the whole Cloverleaf Equine Center (and not for the indoor arena alone). Here is an example of an indoor arena as a part of an equestrian center:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1007620230#layers=P

Compare wiki pages:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dhorse_riding
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Abuilding%3Driding_hall
Hufkratzer (2023-11-09 23:08:36+00:00): This link is better:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1007620230#map=19/53.66726/-2.74177&layers=P
Codesurfer (2023-12-06 13:10:05+00:00): Thank you Hufkratzer! Would you mind giving advice on how to map polo fields and how to add a therapeutic riding center tag. We have a lot of them and I'm having difficulty finding documentation in the wiki.
Hufkratzer (2023-12-07 17:06:21+00:00): Preparing answer ...
Hufkratzer (2023-12-09 22:13:02+00:00): I have no special qualifications to answer these questions, but here are my thoughts:

Polo fields

It seems that most of them (386) are tagged leisure=pitch + sport=polo. I think it makes some sense because I would not call a polo field a riding arena. OTOH round pens are usually tagged like riding arenas nevertheless and there seems to be (see wikipedia) also "arena polo" which is played in smaller polo arenas. A seperate sport=* tag for every equestrian activity is perhaps not such good idea. Therefore I do not want to give a recommendation how to tag polo fields. Maybe you want to ask about that in the community forum. Compare old wiki discussion https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:sport%3Dequestrian#Subtags_for_Dressage_and_Jumping_Arenas

Therapeutic riding

I am not aware that any therapeutic riding center tag exists. 
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1ExV finds some riding centres for therapeutic riding that are already mapped.
I can imagine that a new (sub)tag for therapeutic riding could be invented with key https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:healthcare:speciality which could then be used in combination with leisure=horse_riding or with some other main tag. But I am not familiar with the tagging of healtcare facilities, so maybe better ask about that in the community forum. If you want to invent/propose new tags, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Any_tags_you_like and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal_process for a number of things to consider.
Codesurfer (2023-12-13 02:08:34+00:00): Thanks so much for your assistance. Searched the wiki and found this tag healthcare:speciality=animal-assisted which also had a wiki stub. I'm starting to document that and offer a proposal.
tsp15 (2023-11-13 16:06:44+00:00): Część piesza na ciągu pieszo-rowerowym przy ulicy Francuskiej ma nawierzchnię asfaltową.
woodpeck (2023-11-29 19:38:46+00:00): Many of the round buildings in this changeset do not remotely correspond to anything on Bing imagery. Are you sure that you have been using Bing imagery for this?
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2023-11-09 13:05:23+00:00): 有必要注意的是
目前的沪昆线总关系内的路径基本只包含了沪杭线、浙赣线的。湘黔线、贵昆线的路径很多未被包含在沪昆线总关系内。
抽空完善一下吧，给自己开个工单
YPGGUUY (2023-11-20 18:40:28+00:00): 我认为把小区临街的底商标为商业区的意义不大, 就用地(landuse)规划而言它们是住宅用地的一部分.
jj000 (2023-11-09 13:16:29+00:00): Ingekorte deel hoort bij oprit nr20, daarom weggehaald.
BCNorwich (2023-11-10 07:42:43+00:00): Hi, You've got Deep Footprints Online Marketing Ltd (1222243458, v1) mapped as a self-intersecting line tagged as building=retail.  Should this be a node? 

Also it's tagged as addr:housenumber=11c, but it is within an existing building tagged addr:housenumber=9, is it in the correct place?

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2023-11-10 07:45:33+00:00): Hi, I forgot to mention the tag craft=carpet_layer when other tags refer to a digital design & marketing agency.
smb1001 (2023-11-10 09:14:23+00:00): You're correct and I wasn't happy with that. All of those tags were actually on the building that is number 9, so I gave them the benefit of the doubt in case there's an extension to 11 that runs behind 9 as there's an alley as well.
And leaving it as a way was laziness on my part as I've never known how to reduce a way to a node in Potlatch2. 
But I've turned it to a node and removed the craft tag. I'll have a look to see where it is next time I'm on King's Parade.
eggie (2023-11-09 15:24:14+00:00): Dag dp..  Je vraagt feedback. Lijkt me oke zo. 
groet,
eggie
MxxCon (2023-11-09 21:54:07+00:00): changeset reverted since that's incorrect way to map traffic lights.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143840506
pachpora (2023-11-13 10:59:03+00:00): Hi,

Thank you for reviewing the edit and  making the corrections. These changes were done by the editors in accordance with our internal SOP. We apologize for the incorrect edits flown into OSM from our end. 
We are re-examine all of the changesets in which the team has updated traffic signal/stop sign attributes, and rectify them by 11/16. We will also work on updating the SOP to be followed while adding these attributes on public OSM which align with the community guidelines/OSM wiki.

Regards,
pachpora
julcnx (2023-11-10 04:30:36+00:00): Hi there! Thank you for your contributions! Just a friendly tip for next time, it's a good practice to save and upload your changes before moving on to the next area. You can find more information on changesets and their geographical size at: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
Tomas Straupis (2023-11-09 15:00:22+00:00): Laba diena. Pastatas nugriautas, kad building žyma išimta? Ar tik mokyklos nebėra?
Smiltė (2023-11-09 15:04:02+00:00): Sveiki, pastatas yra, jis renovuotas. Nebėra mokyklos, vietoj jos, įrenta vieta šventėms, konfercijojs, poilsiui. Pavadinimas Piktupės slėnis. Web: https://piktupesslenis.lt/
Tomas Straupis (2023-11-09 15:09:21+00:00): Supratau. Ačiū. Atstačiau pastato žymą, pridėjau svetainės adresą ir panaikinau mokyklos žymą. Sėkmės!
Jrachi (2024-10-09 08:14:26+00:00): Ciao.
Hai cancellato  oltre 100 relazioni!
Sei sicuro fossero tutte errate/doppioni/inesistenti?

Ivo
Udarian (2023-11-10 21:46:51+00:00): wouldn't "updated traffic signals" be a better commit message since it better describes what was done in the commit since it wasn't stop signs that were added rather traffic signals.
pachpora (2023-11-13 10:02:11+00:00): Hi,
Thank you for reviewing the edit and notifying us about the improper modifications. These changes were done by the editors in accordance with our internal SOP. We apologize for the incorrect edits flown into OSM from our end. I have investigated the edits and made the appropriate changes in the changeset ID # 143963066.
We will re-examine all of the changesets in which the team has updated traffic signal/stop sign attributes, and rectify them by 11/16. We will also work on updating the SOP to be followed while adding these attributes on public OSM which align with the community guidelines/OSM wiki.
Regards,
pachpora
Udarian (2023-11-17 02:36:35+00:00): I dont know if I was misunderstood, it is preferable for the traffic_signals to be at the lines on the roads were the cars should stop, what this commit actually did was correct, my original message on this commit was to do with the change set comment on this. 
I felt that "Added Stop Sign." does not properly describe what was done in the commit and was simply pointing out that something like "Updated Traffic Signals" would have better described what was done. 
in short, my issue with the commit was not with the contents but to do with https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments.
Udarian (2023-11-17 02:39:25+00:00): I was not pointing out "improper modifications", just that the comment=* could have been better.
pachpora (2023-11-17 04:57:50+00:00): Hi,
Thank you for notifying us about incorrect changeset comments. We will be more careful while adding comments based on what edits/modifications have been made in that particular changeset.
Regards,
pachpora
Udarian (2023-11-18 01:37:01+00:00): so, just to make sure we understand each other here; the edits on this commit (143823733) were good and should have been kept (I have since fixed the fact that this was reverted in a commit of my own), I had no issue with that. the only issue was with the fact that the change set comment (comment=*) inaccurately described what was done in the commit, thats it.
pachpora (2023-11-21 13:04:08+00:00): Hi,
We have understood your point of view and also given feedback to our editors on adding correct changeset comments based on what edits have been made.
Regards,
pachpora
MxxCon (2023-11-09 21:55:57+00:00): 'House number and street names MUST be in separate tags. Also this is wrong tag name and value for the country name.
This edit reverted in full.'

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143840537
keimo (2023-11-13 09:40:40+00:00): Yksi ref-tagi olisi hyvä olla vain yhdessä objektissa per pysäkki, nyt se on sekä laiturissa että näissä 'tram_stop' nodessa. Ovatko nämä ylimääräiset nodet nyt varmasti tarpeen?
HSL_PALAUTE (2023-11-13 10:42:35+00:00): Meillä Digitransitin puolella tuo aluekohteelle asetettu ref-tagi Otaniemen ja Leppävaaran kohdalla aiheuttaa tällä hetkellä hieman harmia, koska laiturit ovat kävelyalueiden ympäröimiä ja aluekohteiden yhdistelyprosessin virheen vuoksi, syntyy tilanne, jossa pysäkkilinkitys menee aika kauas pysäkin todellisesta sijainnista. Ylimääräisen noden on tarkoitus olla tilapäinen ratkaisu, jolla varmistettaisiin että linkitys menee tähän tiettyyn pisteeseen, kunnes saamme yhdistelyprosessin toimimaan järkevämmin tällaisessa tilanteessa. Vaihtoehtoisesti toimiva ratkaisu tilapäiseen tarpeeseen, olisi siirtää tuo ref-tagi tuota laiturialuetta halkovalle way-kohteelle, joka testiemme perusteella toimisi myös. Olisiko tämä parempi ratkaisu?