piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2023-12-30 14:46:13+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. However, a lot of buildings are not squared with the Q key !

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144597154
silversurfer83 (2023-11-29 20:23:41+00:00): Moin :)

ein paar freundliche Hinweise:

Hindernisse müssen immer auch mit dem Weg verbunden sein, den sie beeinträchtigen. Will heißen: Ein Tor kann gerne als Linie über die volle reale Länge gezeichnet werden, es muss trotzdem ein Verbindungspunkt mit dem Weg geben und dieser Punkt muss auch als Tor gekennzeichnet sein.
Hab das mal gemacht: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144602771

Und noch ein Tip für alles, was rechtwinklig sein soll (zB dein RZB aus der Änderung vorher): Nach dem Zeichnen einfach "Q" drücken und alle Winkel werden zu 90° gezogen.

Happy mapping
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144597181
Jottes112 (2023-11-30 05:53:06+00:00): Moin moin,
Vielen Dank für die Infos! Ich tue mir mit ein paar Sachen noch etwas schwer. Arbeite sber dran. Mit dem Q kannte ich noch nicht, werde ich gleich mal ausprobieren. 
Grüße
Metzor (2023-12-11 21:38:58+00:00): Hi Slash!

Brouter Suspects hat mich wegen einem "dead start" zu deinem Änderungssatz geschickt.

Und zwar geht es um das Stück der Haller Straße parallel zur B 14, östlich der Kreuzung mit Heroldsfeld

Durch die zwei Einfahrtsbeschränkungsrelationen darf der Routeralgo da von West nach Ost als PKW nicht rein - er kann aber von dem Straßenstückchen aus losfahren, also eine verdächtige Stelle (denn wie konnte da überhaupt ein PKW hinkommen). An sich könnte man das als false positive werten. Andererseits: Was spricht dagegen den highway als oneway=yes mit oneway:bus=no zu taggen? 
Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:oneway:bus

Dann wäre man zwei für Anfänger schwer zu wartende Relationen los. Außerdem könnte der Renderer die Einbahnstraße pfeilchen einzeichnen.
Was dagegen, wenn ich es so änder?

Generell sind Abbiegebeschränkungen (in id "Pfeile wegklicken") ein zweischneidiges Schwert. Geht schnell nach hinten los, wenn da jemand später unbedarft Änderungen vornimmt, z.B. Wege aufspaltet. Also bitte zukünftig möglichst Alternativen nutzen :-)

Viele Grüße und fröhliches Mappen
Metzor
slash246 (2023-12-12 19:51:01+00:00): Hallo Metzor,

an der Abzweigung von der B14 in die Haller Straße steht kein Einbahnstraßenschild.

Meiner Meinung nach ist daher die Vorgehensweise wie hier https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:oneway unter "Unechte Einbahnstraßen" beschrieben hierfür passend, deshalb habe ich mit Abbiegebeschränkungen gearbeitet.
Das Teilstück als Einbahnstraße zu taggen wäre hier eher falsch da es sich nicht um eine offizielle Einbahnstraße handelt.

Viele Grüße,
slash246
Metzor (2023-12-12 21:09:34+00:00): Hi slash246,

Danke für die Erklärung! Du hast natürlich Recht. Und ich habe wieder was dazu gelernt :-)

Schönen Abend noch!
Metzor
BCNorwich (2023-11-30 08:00:36+00:00): Hi, There's a problem here with your new way High Street (1227225136). Firstly you've mapped it as doubling back over itself. Secondly you've mapped it on top of the existing way, High Street (511294158), to which side roads join. This makes for duplication of highways, disrupting routing. 

If a way needs correcting/amending it's OSM practice to correct the existing way rather than mapping a new way. Thus the history of the way is maintained.

Could you please remove your new (duplication) section of highway High Street (1227225136) and make the correcting/amending to the existing highway. Need any help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2023-12-02 07:45:33+00:00): Hi, I've looked at correcting the problem for you but the lanes tags are all mixed up. Not being local I can't tell how it should be. Thus I've removed the duplicate/triplicate way.

Please put the corrected tags on the existing way.

Regards Bernard.
Gonéo (2023-11-29 21:34:46+00:00): Je ne suis pas certain d'avoir tout compris. Quelle est la partie à supprimer ? L'ancien chemin qui contourne les maisons par le sud a disparu ? Fermé ?

L'escalier est tracé à partir d'une trace GPS ? D'après Strava il est légèrement plus au nord et plus rectiligne.

Les 3 itinéraires de rando passent par cet escalier ?
Gonéo (2023-11-29 21:41:30+00:00): Bon j'ai pu voir le tracé de l'escalier avec l'imagerie d'hiver 2022 sans la végétation. Il correspond à la trace Strava. Je l'ai recalé.

Mes autres questions restent valables
Philippe White (2023-11-30 08:04:53+00:00): Bonjour Goneo et merci pour t'être penché sur le sujet.
Effectivement, comme indiqué mon tracé était approximatif basé sur mes souvenirs du terrain. Parfait si tu as pu affiner à partir de traces Strava.
L'ancien tracé qui fait le tour de la maison n'est plus visible à partir du bas de l'escaler (une affiche indique le nouveau tracé via l'escalier).
C'est pourquoi j'ai supprimé uine partie du sentier qui contourne la maison (je ne sais pas jusqu'où le supprimer, je ne l'ai pas emprunté car il n'est plus raccordé).
Effectivement le balisage empruntait l'escalier donc tous les itinéraires de randonnée sont à rétablir par l'escalier.
Merci et bonne journéE.
Gonéo (2023-11-30 19:43:17+00:00): Les 3 itinéraires de rando sont rétablis https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144637923

J'ai laissé le bout de l'ancien sentier encore visible sur l'imagerie aérienne et j'ai supprimé le reste.
empty_child (2023-11-29 19:25:28+00:00): Hello grirunov,
Yes, thanks. I think, that it was autocorrection on my keyboard
TheConductor (2023-12-01 17:40:04+00:00): Hello, you downgraded these sections that were deliberately tagged by me as secondary. Both Melarkey Street and the section of W 4th St. handle the majority of north-south moves between US 95 and parts north of town. For us who live here, this remains a very worthy secondary corridor providing a quicker route to US 95 (1 stoplight vs. 2). It's a small town and these things matter you know.
Joseph R P (2023-12-01 22:45:47+00:00): That was my assumption actually, since I've seen roads like these used this way all over the place in various cities and small towns I've been in around the country. I believed tertiary was sufficient enough for a local street that serves as a de facto bypass of a traffic light, since compared to Bridge Street (which serves as 'main street' for businesses and connects the rest of the town to them) it's just a minor downtown collector road.
TheConductor (2023-12-01 23:25:51+00:00): Both good points. Where Bridge St. is the de facto Main Street, it’s avoided by most locals due mostly to its narrow construction, high concentration of businesses, pedestrian traffic, etc. If not for its connectivity to points North and South, I probably would have dropped that section to Tertiary in favor of the alternate routing via Melarkey and 4th. The other route does have on street parking but with the city undertaking a project to eliminate that in the near future to improve vehicle travel, this routing is a envisioned as a “higher priority” route and has been something I’ve enjoyed having in the routing softwares exclusively utilizing OSM.
silversurfer83 (2023-11-29 20:40:25+00:00): Hi :)

du hast hier den neuen Pfad mit einer Verwaltungsgrenze verbunden. Das ist eher ungünstig, vermutlich aber auch nur ein Versehen.
Du solltest immer darauf achten, dass du nur Objekte miteinander verbindest, die auch wirklich verbunden werden müssen. Wege werden idR mit anderen Wegen oder auch mit Eingängen verbunden. Ich hab das mal wieder getrennt und mit der neben der Grenze liegenden Straße verbunden.

Um das Problem mit Grenzen zu umgehen kannst du dir die Grenzen auch ausblenden. Dafür rechts "Kartendaten" einblenden (oder Taste "U") und dann ganz unten bei "Kartenobjekte" das Häkchen bei "Grenzen" entfernen.

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144598361
emersonveenstra (2023-12-01 11:21:02+00:00): Hi there,

on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/311206346 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1227638260 you put "*:signed=no", which is not a standard tag. Could you explain a bit more about what you were trying to show with this? There may be a better tagging option for it
MichaelStenberg (2023-12-01 16:15:02+00:00): Thank you so much for the note - I appreciate it. I think I messed up the change here after reading this on the Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:*:signed

Basically, when this was used in this changeset, it was meant to symbolize that this street (Iris) and the one across from it do not have street signs, though they may be named. It's caused some confusion around this area, was trying to follow best practices with how to signify this. 

Would the correct change be signed=no? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:name:signed%3Dno
emersonveenstra (2023-12-01 16:55:56+00:00): Thanks for the quick response!

Then it would be name:signed=no, to specify that it's the name that is not signed
Michael Stenberg (2023-12-01 17:12:05+00:00): Perfect. I'll get this adjusted. Thank you for the help here.
b-holdet (2024-01-06 20:58:14+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16769319

cement vs. concrete ?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface=cement
Palgrave Peter (2024-01-08 14:46:02+00:00): Actually the surface is gravel, so I have corrected it.
Baloo Uriza (2023-12-01 15:11:39+00:00): Not quite how to fix this... Layer=-1 is below ground.  No layer tag is necessary here, just split the way where it enters and leaves the building, the inside part gets tagged tunnel=building_passage
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144598773
ljmaps (2023-12-04 12:20:35+00:00): Thank you Baloo Uriza, I have made the fix and changed the layer back to 0, split the way and added the tunnel = building_passage tag as you have recommended.
ljmaps (2023-12-04 12:21:29+00:00): The fix to this changeset is located here: 144752915.
Jakka (2023-11-29 19:36:19+00:00): Dit is geen fysieke controleerbare plaats en zo ook geen plaats in osm.
Werd verwijderd verstoord mogelijk andere applicaties.
woodpeck_repair (2023-11-29 18:11:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 144598994 where the changeset comment is: revert edits by troll account
woodpeck_repair (2023-11-29 18:11:10+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 144598912, 144598950.
Road–Runner (2024-05-17 20:30:08+00:00): but pedestrians are still allowed ;)
vojtechzaboril (2024-05-17 20:58:12+00:00): Sorry if I changed the foot tags. It was not on purpose.
silversurfer83 (2023-11-29 20:31:45+00:00): Moin udo2001,

ich möchte dich hier mit den Lifecycle Prefixes vertraut machen :)

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix

Falls hier noch irgendwas darauf hindeutet, dass hier mal diese Wirtschaft war, dann sollte nicht einfach gelöscht werden, sondern wir ändern die Eigenschaften entsprechend dem Artikel im Wiki.

Hier wird aus "amenity=restaurant" in dem Fall vermutlich "disused:amenity=restaurant" und falls der Name in der Gegend noch bekannt ist oder noch an der Wand hängt "old_name=Heckenwirtschaft".

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144599178
Dawid2849 (2023-12-08 18:10:08+00:00): Proszę, nie dodawaj numerów węzłów pod renderer. Jeśli nie ma znaków w terenie, to numer węzła (jeśli istnieje, bo większość, ale nie każdy węzeł w Polsce go posiada) umieszczamy w znaczniku unsigned_ref.
user_125718 (2023-12-09 01:34:03+00:00): Lies mal
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening%20hours
bertie_wooster (2023-12-09 19:46:30+00:00): Gelesen, Fehler erkannt, danke für den Hinweis :-)
mcliquid (2023-11-30 06:19:15+00:00): Hi,

just a general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
NorthCrab_upload (2023-11-29 18:30:24+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6564028684
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/854913966

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
mcliquid (2023-11-30 06:19:43+00:00): Hi,

just a general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144600083
AE35 (2023-11-30 18:29:16+00:00): Thanks for reply - I investigate how the Mapcomplete tool can closed a changeset session (it keeps the session open  for a while - think 1 hour) - before I move to another part of Europe.
DressyPear4 (2023-12-04 23:08:34+00:00): Olá, era só ter acrescentado "hgv=no" você acabou apagando todas as etiquetas que definem a via
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144600550
literan (2023-11-30 20:11:04+00:00): а зачем адрес со здания удалять?
czebureks (2023-11-30 04:58:51+00:00): Cześć! 
Dzięki za pomoc w mapowaniu OpenStreetMap. Zawsze cieszymy się z nowych maperów w okolicy.
Jest jednak kilka problemów z Twoim zestawem zmian:
1) Tagu "railway=rail" używamy dla czynnych linii; odpowiednim tagiem dla gdańskiej wąskotorówki w dzisiejszym stanie jest "railway=razed".
2) Odnośnie tramwajów wodnych to prawda, że już od kilku lat nie kursują po tych trasach, jednak warto zostawić ich "przystanki", które wciąż stanowią wartościową infrastrukturę. Ponadto, trochę zrobiło się bałaganu przy edytowaniu relacji, ale to akurat dość trudne dla początkujących, więc się tym nie przejmuj. Myślę, że faktycznie warto tu przemianować "route" na "disused:route" - zrobię to w najbliższym czasie.
3) Hurtownia Szczepan już znajduje się na mapie w formie obrysu całej działki, którą zajmuje - nie trzeba dodawać jej drugi raz.

Podsumowując, wycofałem ten zestaw zmian. Jeżeli jednak uważasz, że któreś ze zmian powinny zostać przywrócone, zapraszam do dyskusji.
RSydes (2023-11-29 19:18:15+00:00): Stupid glitchy autofill.  Correct comment: "Looks like a boulder to me".
arjunaraoc (2024-01-01 02:16:24+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
Check my update https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145750624

Happy mapping!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144601677
emersonveenstra (2023-11-29 22:34:13+00:00): Hi there,

I undid this changeset because it looks like something got messed up, your comment says "Added street light", but you didn't add any street lights, you deleted a road and then looks like you tried to add a crossing node, but added it to the road intersection instead of the crossing intersection.

Feel free to try it again, but remember that roads that are physically separated should be separate roads, and crossing nodes go on the intersection of the sidewalk and the road, not on the intersection of the roads. Hope this helps!
emersonveenstra (2023-11-29 22:27:24+00:00): Hey there,

Could you please give a little more justification for changing these from motorway_link to motorway?
flohoff (2023-11-29 21:12:33+00:00): Moin,

du hast hier an der B64 die Radwegebenutzungspflicht weggenommen. Seit wann sind denn die Z240 da weg? Es gibt bilder von Ende Oktober und da stehen die noch. 

Richtung Münster ist der rechtseitige angeordnet und richtung Rheda ist der linksseitige angeordnet.

D.h. das mit dem bicycle=use_sidepath und foot=use_sidepath wäre doch richtig oder?

Flo
DeFra85 (2023-11-29 21:17:24+00:00): Aber auf der anderen Seite ist ja auch noch ein Bürgersteig
flohoff (2023-11-29 21:22:24+00:00): Für das use_sidepath ist das ja irrelevant. Das kommt ja auf die Straße die dann eben nicht mehr genutzt werden darf. Und es gibt ja Angeordnete Rad/Fußwege. 

Eigentlich kann man nicht rechts UND links anordnen aber selbst vor dem Kreishaus in GT gibt's sowas.

Flo
Bierphysik (2024-11-06 10:18:07+00:00): Moin. Sind die Baumaßnahmen vorbei? Laut Artikel war geplant bis April 2024 zu bauen.
Bierphysik (2024-11-10 17:10:15+00:00): Ping?
NorthCrab_upload (2023-11-29 20:50:25+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9608806638
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1012136232

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
MxxCon (2023-12-01 04:33:54+00:00): Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you map 1227670142 and 1227670140 as 2 separate features? What is different between them? If both of them have identical tags, shouldn't it be just one feature?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144603391
NorthCrab_upload (2023-11-29 21:00:28+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16770095
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16770096

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-28 07:09:43+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/478592657/history has access:bicycle that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
Would using bicycle access tag (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bicycle ) be fitting at least equally well?
theraser (2024-03-20 07:17:52+00:00): Hi, sorry for the late response. Yes, this alternative should be working. bicycle_bypass=yes is there, too. This should be enough.
Coyotelela (2023-11-29 21:26:32+00:00): J'ai mis à jour la piste cyclable qui va vers pont de Grange, c'est ma première contribution.
Je prend souvent cet itinéraire à vélo.
bxl-forever (2023-11-29 21:43:06+00:00): Hello,

In this changeset, you added 13 nodes for addresses in Romania… and moved a solar panel in England by a few inches.  The latter is probably a mistake, and that explains why your change is shown as a huge box covering half of the continent.

You might also be interested to write proper changeset comments as from now; typing random character strings such as: "tt", "ttt", "fhjgjh", "oo", "oikgm", "fdghbd", "ghgy", "fdgsdgtf", "ggg"… look very suspicious.  I inspected some of those changes and most of them seem okay, so please describe what you did on the map, e.g. that you added opening hours for a business, that you added more addresses in your hometown, etc.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Happy mapping.
user_6260040 (2023-11-29 23:09:37+00:00): Hello! I was unaware of the change in England.
Been looking for good adress tags for villages, but the code is very raw. 
I am unable to revert this Changeset.
I found no way to do it myself.
Feel free to revert 9071627129 back to v1.
The others I has second thought over the Privacy issues.
mottiger (2023-12-19 20:48:22+00:00): Höi
Du hast in diesem CS einige highway=give_way direkt auf Kreuzungsnodes gesetzt. Wie ist das zu interpretieren?
Liebe Grüsse
LeTopographeFou (2024-02-04 22:21:21+00:00): Hello, I put the tag at the intersection since it is painted on the road that all roads have to give way. That's a way to not put one on each way, especially since there is no official positon. Similar to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dstop#All-way_stop, but not documented.
mottiger (2024-02-04 23:03:17+00:00): Thanks for the information.
Makes sense.
mcliquid (2023-11-30 06:16:03+00:00): Hi,

just a general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
jmsbert (2023-11-29 21:42:20+00:00): additional info: checked about 100 objects that were created in the HOT project. Used project's imagery BING as primary imagery (compared regularly with ESRI / Mapbox); applied different offsets to BING imagery taken into account the former mapping of highways:
-9.41; -1.94
-1.49; 1.05
-8.36; -4.03
John Hanover (2023-12-20 02:02:52+00:00): Hello VLD192. I'm somewhat uncertain as to the purpose of your recent coastline edits in the Aleutian Islands. These edits were made around the beginning of the month. The data you used to replace the existing coastline appears to be of substantially lower quality than what was there previously, making it look suspiciously like an import. Also, when you deleted the old coastline, you did not remove it from the relations for the wildlife refuge and the area that shared the way. This has resulted in the relations having a double boundary, which prevents them from rendering on most maps. I’m hoping you can clarify the purpose of these edits and whether you intend to clean up the relations affected by them.

Respectfully,
John Hanover
VLD192 (2023-12-20 17:35:42+00:00): Hello John Hanover,
Thank you for reaching out regarding the recent edits in the Aleutian Islands made by our editors. The edits were made to resolve a series of invalid crossings on the coastlines and to close an open relation in the area. It was not our intention to harm the map in any way and I apologize for the issues that our edits may have caused. I will investigate the issues that you have brought up and will address them accordingly. Thank you for bringing this to my attention and feel free to reach out with any questions.
Thanks,
VLD192
infeeeee (2023-11-30 11:42:56+00:00): It was already mapped: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7728669887