piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
rumbrummer (2023-03-16 00:31:45+00:00): Der Pass
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/224417857
ist jetzt Teil der Straße - war vorher alleinstehend. Nachdem ich ihn in die Straße gezogen habe, hatte er auch die Tags für den Fußgängerüberweg. Da dort kein Überweg ist (siehe Mapillary) und sich keine Fusswege anschliessen, habe ich die Fußgängerüberweg-Tags entfernt
flohoff (2023-03-16 10:09:17+00:00): Jau - ich habe das mit dem original einträger des Passes auch schon angefangen zu diskutieren. 

Denn den "Pass" gibts gar nicht. Das ist ja hier in der Region eher so das man die Straße so nennt wegen des Lokals "Peter auf'm Berge" 

Deshalb halte ich die eintragung des Passes für falsch. Aber das warst nicht du ;)  Der changeset kommentar hat mich nur verwirrt.

So long

Flo
Đuro Jiří (2023-03-15 08:11:47+00:00): Chiedo spiegazioni, perché sono effettuati questi cambiamenti. Io ho migliorato tutto paese Tarifa secondo immagini satellitari Esri World Imagery (cioè edifici, strade,parchi, panchine, cestini, attività commerciali,erba, monumenti,...). Dopo ho verificato in persona tutto sul posto e effettuato ulteriori miglioramenti. Unico che rimasto è dividere edifici nel centro storico, contorni ho mappato bene.
Ora stai "distruggendo" correzioni giusti.
Đuro Jiří (2023-03-15 08:11:38+00:00): Chiedo spiegazioni, perché sono effettuati questi cambiamenti. Io ho migliorato tutto paese Tarifa secondo immagini satellitari Esri World Imagery (cioè edifici, strade,parchi, panchine, cestini, attività commerciali,erba, monumenti,...). Dopo ho verificato in persona tutto sul posto e effettuato ulteriori miglioramenti. Unico che rimasto è dividere edifici nel centro storico, contorni ho mappato bene.
Ora stai "distruggendo" correzioni giusti.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-03-15 00:20:55+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o miejscowości. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, zastosuj kombinację addr:city + addr:street. Jeśli nie, przekaż nazwę miejscowości w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/827736481

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Đuro Jiří (2023-03-15 08:00:16+00:00): Iglesia de San Mateo di nuovo non risponde alla realtà.
Đuro Jiří (2023-03-15 08:11:28+00:00): Chiedo spiegazioni, perché sono effettuati questi cambiamenti. Io ho migliorato tutto paese Tarifa secondo immagini satellitari Esri World Imagery (cioè edifici, strade,parchi, panchine, cestini, attività commerciali,erba, monumenti,...). Dopo ho verificato in persona tutto sul posto e effettuato ulteriori miglioramenti. Unico che rimasto è dividere edifici nel centro storico, contorni ho mappato bene.
Ora stai "distruggendo" correzioni giusti.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-15 00:39:00+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 133680595, 133688190.
Rudilzd (2023-03-15 02:51:06+00:00): Ok
Đuro Jiří (2023-03-15 08:11:18+00:00): Chiedo spiegazioni, perché sono effettuati questi cambiamenti. Io ho migliorato tutto paese Tarifa secondo immagini satellitari Esri World Imagery (cioè edifici, strade,parchi, panchine, cestini, attività commerciali,erba, monumenti,...). Dopo ho verificato in persona tutto sul posto e effettuato ulteriori miglioramenti. Unico che rimasto è dividere edifici nel centro storico, contorni ho mappato bene.
Ora stai "distruggendo" correzioni giusti.
SomeoneElse (2023-04-30 13:01:02+00:00): Is all of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/807272233 really going to be student accommodation?  I know that ATS Euromaster has shut, but this covers all of Hazel Court as well :)
Yorvik Prestigitator (2023-04-30 15:24:48+00:00): oops, thank you for spotting this, it was just the enterprise hire car and the motorbike shop that are going to be become student accommodation - have fixed this now
scarapella (2023-05-11 17:23:40+00:00): Hello t2editme,

Thanks for your contribution to openstreetmap.

I think if you look atRelation: 15601638 you might find the two inner ways should both be outer ways.  Alternatively they could both be simply standalone polygons with amenity=parking rather than part of a multipolygon.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon#Two_disjunct_outer_rings

Cheers,
scarapella
Đuro Jiří (2023-03-15 08:11:06+00:00): Chiedo spiegazioni, perché sono effettuati questi cambiamenti. Io ho migliorato tutto paese Tarifa secondo immagini satellitari Esri World Imagery (cioè edifici, strade,parchi, panchine, cestini, attività commerciali,erba, monumenti,...). Dopo ho verificato in persona tutto sul posto e effettuato ulteriori miglioramenti. Unico che rimasto è dividere edifici nel centro storico, contorni ho mappato bene.
Ora stai "distruggendo" correzioni giusti.
spiregrain (2023-03-23 13:59:46+00:00): What's this all about?   There seem to be a lot more objects in r15601608 than might be expected?   And that relation has no tags.  Noticed it while looking at r15601608.
MacLondon (2023-03-24 00:03:48+00:00): Sorry, this was a temporary relation I was working from in JOSM that was never meant to have been uploaded. I have deleted it now.
spiregrain (2023-03-24 12:40:05+00:00): Thanks Mate!   I just couldn't figure it out.   I couple of years ago I uploaded a set where many houses where tagged tainted=yes, which might have surprised the residents.  Like your relation, it was intended to be for my own use only!   (Tainted by association with inadmissible address data sources in case you were wondering)
VJ2205 (2023-03-15 02:03:40+00:00): I meant to just say "Updated Tags." The words automatically filled in.
Frans S (2023-03-15 09:24:53+00:00): Hello again. 
No need to mp all these tiny paths. focus on buildings, highways, (including highways connecting buildings.)
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133690671
Frans S (2023-03-16 18:14:48+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping. Please square each rectangular building.

Hello. Thanks for mapping on this difficult task.
About mapping of tall apartment blocks or high buildings

Mapping of tall buildings differs from standard buildings. Because the imagery is taken at an angle, you will see both the rooflines and also the side of a building. 
How do you map such a building?
Map over the rooflines and lastly slide the mapped building to the footprint.
Please adjust wrong positioned buildings as well
This video shows how that is done.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1V5-bADsYiffCD9bo6l64YOdTvmKqMGry/view?usp=share_link



Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2023-03-15 09:23:08+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here .
Please read the paragraph about mapping / tagging of tracks ( valid for paths as well.)
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133690787
Frans S (2023-03-15 09:20:51+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 
Buildings need to be tagged as building=yes. nothing else, no naming tags.
Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133690892
emersonveenstra (2023-03-15 11:00:52+00:00): Hi,

You forgot to remove the lanes:backward and lanes:forward tags when you made https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/241117367 oneway. Could you please fix that? Thanks!
Zol87 (2023-03-16 04:23:55+00:00): For reference, What is a nested route master and why is it just called bus 603 for the master? Wouldn't a route name be more descriptive?
Mundilfari (2023-03-17 01:07:46+00:00): A typical PTv2 route would consist of one route master relation, with the individual routes (e.g. an one for eastbound, one for westbound trips) as members (without a role). 
If any of the trips took an alternative path, these would be added as separate routes within the same route master also.
In this particular case, we had one route master (relation 15594524) that contained another route master (relation 15594510), which then contained the routes. Hence, the "real" route master was "nested" within another (redundant) route master, which I removed. 

Regarding the names, the PTv2 scheme does explicitly define how the name tag should be used. For bus route masters that is "Bus<ref>"  and for bus routes it is "Bus <ref>: <from> => <to>". When multiple bus routes would end up getting the same name this way, "Bus <ref>: <from> => <via> => <to>" should be used.
The official_name tag is a good place for the descriptive name.

You can find more detail about the naming here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Buses

The original proposal that PTv2 is based on is here (it defines the naming conventions in this exact way also): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?oldid=625726
map per (2023-03-20 19:10:30+00:00): Hello boinaa,

this looks like a footway from the aerial imagery. How can you tell that it is a residential road? What sources did you use?

Thanks and best regards
map per
map per (2023-03-22 12:56:35+00:00): Thanks for the fix, but how can you tell that it's access=private by just looking at earial imagery? 
I would suggest to delete access=private if you are not certain that it's true.
boinaa (2023-03-28 12:13:03+00:00): Hello map,
Thank you for reviewing the changeset and highlighting the issue. This is an honest mistake from my end where I added residential road without much evidence. I have also removed private access based on your suggestion.Thanks once again, looking forward to learn more from you.
Regards,
boinaa
map per (2023-03-28 12:37:26+00:00): Was it intentional that you added access=no?
deepikja (2023-04-02 17:49:48+00:00): Hi, 
The initial edits in the changeset were made by the editor using our internal imagery which reflected outdated due to technical issue. 
The editor misunderstood the part of access = private correction as restricting the access on the way. I have made the necessary changes and retained the default tags applicable on a footway segment mentioned in the OSM wiki. 
Please let me know if you would like us to make any further changes. 
Regards,
Deepikja
map per (2023-04-03 13:00:57+00:00): Ok, thanks, the footway looks good now. It's alarming that this issue wasn't spotted in your internal review.
deepikja (2023-04-16 18:01:02+00:00): Hi,
Unfortunately the edit was validated by the reviewer basis the outdated internal imagery caused due to a technical issue. We apologize for this miss. 
However, as per the recommendations provided by you we have trained the editors and reviewers to ensure that such errors do not repeat in any of the future edits. Thank you for your time. 
Regards,
Deepikja
Devdatta (2023-03-20 07:16:03+00:00): Why is your OSM changeset so big? Please limit it to a smaller area: http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Also keep a meaningful Changeset message.
relaemanila (2023-03-26 13:00:38+00:00): Hello!

Your creation was wrong, and that was for the highways that are ongoing construction works, visible in the imagery or on the ground. For this combination, do the following,

* highway=proposed
* proposed=*

Alternatively, use this tag instead, proposed:highway=*

Why did you say "add a proposed road" when you added a highway as under construction? Wonder why.

Thank you!
wille (2023-03-15 11:59:35+00:00): O Museu não fica em um prédio a parte, mas sim dentro do edifício da arena, conforme essa foto: https://www.instagram.com/p/CmCanG_JIlW/
O Google Maps colocou o museu na localização errada e, aparentemente, você copiou a informação de lá.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133692132
volredman (2023-03-15 13:56:30+00:00): Tem a parte interna reservada para tour de grupos escolares que visitam o estádio por inteiro com acesso ao gramado do campo e o prédio externo além da loja que fica no parte inferior ao lado da sub-estação de energia !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133692132
SomeoneElse (2023-03-15 20:02:15+00:00): Hello,
Andy from the Data Working Group here again.
Regardless of where the museum is, can the user now calling themselves "volredman" actually provide evidence of a _building_ at this location:
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1srK ?
All the OSM-compatible imagery that I can see suggests that there is a large pillar the other side of the path from the statue of Pele, but no building.
To be clear, there have been issues with edits by both sides of this dispute - one has got the names of some streets wrong (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=360183 ) but the other has been guilty of obvious vandalism (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133644351 ) and copying from Google.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
SomeoneElse (2023-03-15 20:02:45+00:00): Olá,
Andy do Grupo de Trabalho de Dados aqui novamente.
Independentemente de onde o museu esteja, o usuário que agora se autodenomina "volredman" pode realmente fornecer evidências de um _edifício_ neste local:
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1srK ?
Todas as imagens compatíveis com OSM que posso ver sugerem que há um grande pilar do outro lado do caminho da estátua de Pelé, mas nenhum edifício.
Para ser claro, houve problemas com edições de ambos os lados desta disputa - um errou os nomes de algumas ruas (consulte https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=360183) mas o outro foi culpado de vandalismo óbvio (consulte https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133644351) e cópia do Google.
Atenciosamente,
Andy Townsend, em nome do Grupo de Trabalho de Dados da OSM.
Frans S (2023-03-15 09:15:19+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.

You are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.

We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

Please pay attention to next points:
All rectangular buildings need to be squared with the Q key. You hardly squared a building
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. Just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.

Tag buildings as building=yes. Nothing more, no names.

Please map each building more accurate over the rooflines 


Don't connect nodes to other buildings or features.

The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 

Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.

See also this document:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/11PsAW0bzUZHbS8YnbaFzqOYhJY7tSPYG/view?usp=share_link

I reviewed all your mapping still now. They all show the same issues.
Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133692221
Frans S (2023-03-18 09:04:56+00:00): Hello. After reviewing this task, I noticed that you mapped already mapped buildings. Mostly it happens when you don't zoom in far enough. 
See the lowest menu line in IDeditor. You are warned that there are buildings hidden
Best regards
emersonveenstra (2023-03-16 11:53:57+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for contributing to the map! A couple of pointers for you:

You added an extra relation here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15601811 that is unneeded, would you mind deleting that?

Also, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1154414833 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1154418226 are incorrect, because you have them marked as 'inner' even though they are not inside the main parking lot area. Generally, you don't put those in the parking lot multipolygon at all, unless they are completely inside the parking area (and even then, most mappers won't even bother adding them).

Hope this helps!
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-10 13:43:50+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10736296357/history has shop = footwear that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
shop=footwear ? What kind of shop, if any is here? Is it intentional that it is used instead of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=shoes?
trigpoint (2023-03-15 20:06:02+00:00): Hi, this edit has gone a bit wrong.

Why have you deleted the drive-through?

Cheers Phil
mubshh (2023-03-17 08:40:32+00:00): Hi trigpoint,
Thank you for reviewing our changeset and flagging out the issue. It's an honest mistake from our end. I have made the necessary changes in the changeset. Always happy to learn from the community. Thanks once again, looking forward to learn more from you.
Regards,
mubshh
mavl (2023-04-25 08:59:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
CoyKoi (2023-03-17 02:35:04+00:00): Welcome to OSM editing. Unfortunately the quality of this changeset was not great - many accidental changes, and re-mapping of existing features. I have reverted it with changeset 133771437
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133693603
mavl (2023-04-25 09:08:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:05:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:06:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:07:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:03:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
❤️‍🔥 (2023-03-15 08:18:10+00:00): hi, there's a known issue in the editor that roads show up as disconnected even when they're fine. Everything looks good here, thanks for your edit
mavl (2023-04-25 09:11:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-03-24 10:29:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 134051515, 134045911, 134058112 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible source - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6981].
mavl (2023-03-24 10:30:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 134051515, 134045911, 134058112 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible source - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6981].
antonr (2023-03-15 08:54:58+00:00): 11 kW ligner grangiveligt en effekt, der angives med charging_station:output :-) Mon ikke det var det Bo forsøgte at inputte?
osmviborg (2023-03-15 09:20:21+00:00): Sandsynligvis, kører fosilbrænder.
antonr (2023-03-15 11:56:01+00:00): Pointen var nok:  Hvorfor slette dette data, når Bo har været så venlig at undersøge det, og indtaste? Jeg tænker at bedre fremgangsmåder end at slette bidrag fra ny(ish) brugere, er at spørge dem hvad meningen er eller slå op i wiki'en og hjælpe dem til at bidrage på en bedre måde...
Ropino (2023-04-19 19:25:43+00:00): Hi,
bist du sicher, dass die Hausnummer nur der Buchstabe "h" ist ?
danacolada2609 (2023-04-20 05:13:05+00:00): Moin, hab’s angepasst :)
Ropino (2023-04-20 07:28:45+00:00): Danke für die schnelle Rückmeldung und Änderung. :)
pitscheplatsch (2023-03-16 14:35:59+00:00): Just a test?
Frans S (2023-03-15 09:07:16+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.

You are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.

We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

Please pay attention to next points:
You included at 2 buildings the yard next to it.
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. Just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.

Tag buildings as building=yes. Nothing more, no names.

Please map each building accurate over the rooflines and squared(rectangular only).


Don't connect nodes to other buildings or features.

The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 

Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.

See also this document:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/11PsAW0bzUZHbS8YnbaFzqOYhJY7tSPYG/view?usp=share_link


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133698122
eggie (2023-03-15 08:22:02+00:00): Hi TU
You removed the whole building and left amenity=social_facility?
Why?
Your edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=133698205


Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2023-03-15 08:27:14+00:00): Restored building.
ualios (2023-03-20 17:46:33+00:00): A parte il paragone azzardato e la ragionevolezza di queste "correzioni", ora però abbiamo uno stop per chi si immette dalla SS293 (da sud), che è vero per chi va a sx/dritto, ma non per chi svolta a dx, dove invece ci vorrebbe un dare precedenza. Ma soprattutto, a seguito delle cancellazioni frettolose, ora non si può più girare a dx, sia da sud che da nord della SS293.
map per (2023-03-16 07:36:09+00:00): Hallo MunichWays,

und wilkommen bei OpenStreetMaps!

Ich finde, das dieser Radwegabschnitt (1) mit smoothness=good und nicht mit intermediate gekennzeichnet werden sollte. Ich bin dort letztens langefahren und hab mir Straßenfotos angeschaut und dort gibt es keine Schlaglöcher und die Strecke kann man problemlos mit einem Rennrad befahren. (Siehe auch Tabelle in (2))

Mit dem smoothness Tag (2) sollte nur die Oberfläche des Weges bewertet werden. Für angaben derüber wie schön der Weg ist sollten andere Tags wie class:bicycle (3) verwendet werden. Diesen Weg (4) würde ich z.B. nach Straßenfotos von 2021 eher als good und nicht als exellent einordnen.

Viele Grüße
map per

(1) https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/344303344/history
(2) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:smoothness?uselang=de
(3) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:class:bicycle?uselang=de
(4) https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/18827808/history