piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
InfosReseaux (2025-08-27 15:55:29+00:00): Hello Relaxxe,

I saw your recent contribution on this 500 kV power line between Chinu and Cerromatoso.
I looked at the provides sources (Mapbox, Bing and ESRI) but none of them contains the provided knowledge.

Where did you find the missing parts those aerial imagery don't show please?
fortera_au (2025-08-26 21:09:51+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 170980008, 170980116, 170980194, 170980256, 170980301, 170980437, 170980571, 170980622, 170980668, 170980744, 170980770, 170980815, 170980868, 170980904, 170980934, 170980969, 170981010, 170981037, 170981165, 170981182, 170981242, 170981292, 170981321, 170981345, 170981425, 170981487, 170981515, 170981548, 170981567, 170981626, 170981642, 170981682, 170981721, 170981750, 170981759, 170981785, 170981801, 170981827, 170981855, 170981885, 170981915, 170981938, 170981959, 170981990, 170982014, 170982057, 170982081, 170982164, 170982204, 170982222, 170982250, 170982290, 170982320, 170982333, 170982366, 170982381, 170982424, 170982460, 170982496, 170982558, 170982586, 171012968.
grzegorz75jan (2025-08-27 06:44:58+00:00): Co tej drodze https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/354322956 dolega by z residential zmieniać ją na service
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:highway
trigpoint (2025-10-13 14:15:22+00:00): Hello
Thank you for your edit.

Unfortunately barrier=yes isn't very effective for blocking routers as it is prottey vague, it nay be  gate or a stile which are passable.

After a survey I have updated them to barrier=fence.

Cheers Phil
Alexmol (2025-08-26 21:48:11+00:00): Actualização de postos de carregamento
Alexmol (2025-08-26 21:54:44+00:00): Actualização de postos de carregamento
postmanwm (2025-08-26 22:10:04+00:00): Объекта не существует уже давно
NorthCrab_upload (2025-08-26 22:20:53+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13099151863
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13099151864
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13099151865

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Sniping (2025-08-27 09:01:08+00:00): Dziękuję za uwagę. Oczywiście, że zrobiłem amatorski błąd. Wpisywałem już paczkomaty i taki błąd popełniłem na początku pracy z OSM. Jeszcze raz dziękuję. Teraz chyba już jest dobrze. Pozdrawiam.
Ernie C (2025-08-29 12:43:51+00:00): Oops, thanks.
ChrissW-R1 (2025-10-02 19:56:59+00:00): You're welcome.
snoozingnewt (2025-08-27 03:45:58+00:00): Can't believe they really did it
user_11435438 (2025-08-27 11:56:16+00:00): 这是废弃道路，不应该标记为如此高等级的道路
user_11435438 (2025-08-27 11:57:23+00:00): c，看错了，还真是新建的
citrula (2025-08-27 02:24:11+00:00): Welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contribution. You dragged around a lot of existing objects, like roads, in this edit. I have fixed that for you, but please be more careful next time!
user_5359 (2025-08-28 16:59:21+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1425111852. What is the mean of the tag acpr = yes
?
BarryMyles (2025-08-29 00:36:06+00:00): Oops, that was definitely an error on my part. Should have been access=private. I've fixed it now. Thanks for spotting.
user_5359 (2025-08-27 07:28:28+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Your SPAM was reverted by https://www.osm.org/changeset/171064479
user_5359 (2025-08-27 07:30:00+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Your SPM was reverted by https://www.osm.org/changeset/171064547.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-05-30 09:10:27+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with self-promotional description=*

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183390068
Ewrt1 (2025-08-27 01:14:12+00:00): *alignment based on aerial imagery
eggie (2025-08-27 06:21:24+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Natfoot (2026-03-08 18:37:52+00:00): the details for this route is primarily behind a pay wall.
mirabilos (2025-08-27 02:24:30+00:00): I’m not entirely sure whether the path is correctly connected to both Dorfplatz (road) on the south and Grüner Weg (road) on the north, as it only shows the former, but if I move the connecting node in iD, it moves both roads, so I think it should be.
citrula (2025-08-27 18:07:02+00:00): Welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contribution. This looks good to me
Frans S (2025-08-28 15:06:23+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please do not add a hashtag as a name to a building.
Please also square all rectangular buildings,
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2025-08-27 15:06:35+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 
A few issues:
A: Inaccurate mapping and buildings not squared.
B: Overlapping buildings.
F: Buildings partly hidden under trees.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171059650
Frans S (2025-08-27 14:41:06+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
A: Inaccurate mapping. Often oversized or not on footprint. 
E: Buildings not squared or rounded.

H: Included a yard of clearing.


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171059697
user_21736114 (2025-08-27 04:57:36+00:00): також намальовано farmyard
user_21736114 (2025-08-27 04:58:18+00:00): також намальовано landuse=industrial
Frans S (2025-08-27 13:54:03+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Just a few issues.  
Follow the rooflines accurate. A few buildings were mapped just as a rectangular building, despite they are more complex.
Please do not connect nodes of buildings to each other. Each building need to be mapped as an individual one.
Please solve the issues, shown by the issues' triangle before you upload your mappings.
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171059766
Frans S (2025-08-27 14:28:06+00:00): Hello. We welcome you as a new mapper.
a few issues.
Each rectangular building need to be squared with the Q key while selected.
Do not connect nodes of buildings to each other.
Map more accurate please.
You mapped also buildings which don't show any object on Esri which is the Imagery to be uses ( newest one)
I corrected them
Best regards and keep mapping
Aerond (2025-08-28 12:01:42+00:00): Tror det är fixat med denna nu: https://www.osm.org/changeset/171131181
AndersAndersson (2025-08-28 21:52:57+00:00): Toppen!
사슴눈갈이 (2025-10-04 01:35:52+00:00): 간첩이냐 빨갱이냐
Frans S (2025-08-28 15:06:09+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please map buildings accurate over their roof and follow extensions. Not all buildings are simply rectangular.
Best regards
Gregory Peony (2025-09-01 22:44:36+00:00): Welcome to OSM and thank you for your contribution!

You identified buildings in the imagery.

Sometimes you enveloped multiple buildings in a single footprint; each footprint should represent one building. Use colours and shadows to deternine where one building ends and another begins.

While it's good that you're trying to be efficient, you inappropriately copy and pasted building footprints here i.e. the copied footprints did not accurately represent buildings visible in the imagery. One of the best ways to be efficient is to make high quality contributions; that way the data won't need to change unless the ground truth does.

When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom in so that you can see the outline of the building and mark the corners carefully. Exclude shadows and yards when tracing the footprint. Keep in mind that you are looking at the roofs of buildings, but mapping their footprints. Depending on how the scene is lit, pitched roofs may have light and dark sections that belong to one building. Generally pitched roofs overhang the walls of a building, so a footprint slightly smaller than the roof is accurate. You can scale selected features in ID with shift+(-/+), or JOSM with ctrl.+alt+Lclick & drag. Take care to make contributions that others can build upon.

Please do not connect the corners of buildings to other buildings or features such as highways or residential areas. In the iD Editor, hold down the `Alt` key to prevent your cursor from snapping to existing data and accidentally creating shared(grey) nodes. This [video about connected nodes](https://youtu.be/ltn1VOiq5_0) has more information and a guide.

After tracing and tagging features which are likely square or round, please remember to square their corners (q), or circularise them (o), because it is almost impossible and time consuming to draw shapes so percisely by hand. Buildings with metal or pitched roofs tend to have square corners; round buildings are identifiable by the distinctive cresent shaped shadow they cast. Unless the building is clearly a different shape then it's best to assume that it should be rounded or its corners should be squared. In the iD Editor, you can right click for access to editing functions. Since roofs tend to overhang walls trace the initial shape slightly smaller to allow a buffer for any change in size that may occur. In JOSM use the [buildingstools plugin](osm.wiki/JOSM/Plugins/BuildingsTools). In ID you must draw the shape accurately enough else shapes will not completely square. This [video about squaring features in ID](https://youtu.be/Xs5wX592E1o) has more information and a demo.

Keep on mapping!
Gregory Peony (2025-09-01 22:39:17+00:00): Welcome to OSM and thank you for your contribution! 

You identified buildings in the imagery.

While it's good that you're trying to be efficient, you inappropriately copy and pasted building footprints here i.e. the copied footprints did not accurately represent buildings visible in the imagery. One of the best ways to be efficient is to make high quality contributions; that way the data won't need to change unless the ground truth does.
When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom in so that you can see the outline of the building and mark the corners carefully. Exclude shadows and yards when tracing the footprint. Keep in mind that you are looking at the roofs of buildings, but mapping their footprints. Depending on how the scene is lit, pitched roofs may have light and dark sections that belong to one building. Generally pitched roofs overhang the walls of a building, so a footprint slightly smaller than the roof is accurate. You can scale selected features in ID with shift+(-/+), or JOSM with ctrl.+alt+Lclick & drag.  Take care to make contributions that others can build upon.

Please do not connect the corners of buildings to other buildings or features such as highways or residential areas. In the iD Editor, hold down the `Alt` key to prevent your cursor from snapping to existing data and accidentally creating shared(grey) nodes. This [video about connected nodes](https://youtu.be/ltn1VOiq5_0) has more information and a guide.

After tracing and tagging features which are likely square or round, please remember to square their corners (q), or circularise them (o), because it is almost impossible and time consuming to draw shapes so percisely by hand. Buildings with metal or pitched roofs tend to have square corners; round buildings are identifiable by the distinctive cresent shaped shadow they cast. Unless the building is clearly a different shape then it's best to assume that it should be rounded or its corners should be squared. In the iD Editor, you can right click for access to editing functions. Since roofs tend to overhang walls trace the initial shape slightly smaller to allow a buffer for any change in size that may occur. In JOSM use the [buildingstools plugin](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/BuildingsTools). In ID you must draw the shape accurately enough else shapes will not completely square. This [video about squaring features in ID](https://youtu.be/Xs5wX592E1o) has more information and a demo.

Keep on mapping!
Gregory Peony (2025-09-02 02:11:26+00:00): Hi it looks like you duplicated footprints by mapping new ones on top of existing ones. If you want to improve the existing data then please modify it instead of deleting or re-mapping. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171060796
Gregory Peony (2025-09-02 02:22:13+00:00): I resolved this by deleting these footprints, while preserving the older ones.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171060796
EcoJohn (2025-09-02 11:22:49+00:00): Undskyld mig men hvorfor er alt information tilføjet omkring adresser på Paul Bergsøe Kollegiet? Er der en politik om ikke at sætte adresser på?
osmviborg (2025-09-02 12:20:19+00:00): Hej, ja i DK er adresseoplysninger kun på punker, punkter som importeres fra Danmarks Adresseregister (DAR) via [1] autoAWS. Adresseansvaret ligger hos den enkelte kommune.

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/autoAWS
Lostmonkey (2025-09-02 14:07:38+00:00): Lidt mere info: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Da:Adresser
EcoJohn (2025-09-02 14:58:02+00:00): Nu havde jeg også tilføjet addr:flats tag på redigeringerne, for at specificerer hvor underadresserne egenligt ligger. Disse fremgår også i DAR men er ikke tilstede et enesete sted på OSM. Har man simpelthen stillet sig tilfreds med at disse ikke kan indføres på mere end et punkt? Tak for svar forresten.
osmviborg (2025-09-02 15:23:14+00:00): Ja. Dine adresseoplysninger var tilføjet bygningerne, det bruger vi ikke. Forslag, henvend dig til Rudersdal Kommune, måske kan du overtale dem til en ændring af adresseringen.
RobotFK (2025-08-27 06:32:05+00:00): Source, website
Langlaeufer (2025-08-27 10:03:37+00:00): Hallo OK bus_bay ist ein Tag für die Straßenachse und wird nicht als separate Linie eingetragen
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171062455
OK_SZ (2025-08-27 10:12:19+00:00): "Teile die Straße (highway=*) über die Länge der Haltebucht auf und tagge den Abschnitt mit bus_bay=*. "
Da denkt man doch, das man die Straße /in zwei Spuren aufteilen/ soll. Gemeint ist aber, so verstehe ich dich, /unterteilen/. 
Ich korrigiere das dann.
OSM_RogerWilco (2025-08-28 08:55:57+00:00): Hallo  KA Celle und willkommen bei OpenStreetMap!

Die Beschreibung "Gemeindehaus" war bereits vorhanden. Du hast hier "Gemeindehaus" als Name hinzugefügt. Bei OSM tragen wir nur echte Eigennamen als Namen ein. Die Funktion eines Gebäudes wird anders eingetragen. Ich habe das  jetzt angepasst.

Viele Grüße
Roger Wilco
OSM_RogerWilco (2025-08-30 15:06:38+00:00): Hallo KA Celle,
was wolltest Du hier ursprünglich machen? Du hast hier mehrere Ackerflächen in landwirtschaftliche Betriebsflächen/Höfe geändert. Das ist jedenfalls nicht richtig. Ich ändere das wieder zurück.
Viele Grüße
Roger Wilco
limes11 (2025-08-27 19:44:12+00:00): Moin,

was ist das für ein Lift mitten auf der Wiese ?

Verrutscht ?

Viele Grüße
jeka p (2025-08-28 19:33:20+00:00): Hoi,
habe jetzt ein Gebäude im Bau dazugezeichnet.
SG
Hidden Mountain (2025-08-27 15:49:50+00:00): По указателям также есть хороший образец рядом, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11149348766

Почитайте про тег destination
tordans (2025-08-27 07:47:18+00:00): Thanks. So you still see this a lot from GoMap edits? FYI: I forwarded the changeset to look for a bug.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171064272
Hidden Mountain (2025-08-27 15:47:35+00:00): Добрый день, пожалуйста, не нужно дублировать тип объекта в название, это избыточная информация на карте, другими словами - мусор. Сами сможете исправить?
Jordi MF (2025-08-27 11:23:36+00:00): Hola Sanfelixuco,

Gracias por mejorar los datos de OSM, pero hay una norma general que consiste en no añadir nombres descriptivos en los elementos de OSM. En este caso, "Planta productiva" es un nombre descriptivo, así que lo he eliminado. En la etiqueta "description" y building=* queda suficientemente descrito.

Aquí tienes la wiki en la que se explica: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions

Lo mismo ocurre con el nombre que has añadido en el área urbana de Alginet: las áreas residenciales no deberían de llevar ningún nombre.

Saludos y gracias! ;)
martien-176 (2025-08-27 19:11:59+00:00): Hi Gomal, please always explain in the changeset comment what you did and why. Esp. when deleting features.

Thanks and regards,

Martien, validator
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171065118
Gomal Amin (2025-08-28 07:39:26+00:00): Hi martin, thank you for pointing out. Will make sure next time. The deleted features were temporary field boundaries.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171065118
Peer van Daalen (2025-08-28 15:31:10+00:00): Wie an der anderen Stelle schon beschrieben, sind die nicht hier hin gezogen, sondern sind schon seit Jahren hier. 

Der Rest steht an der Notiz/Meldung an der Ecke Jakobstraße 122.
ilias_ (2025-08-27 12:15:34+00:00): please don't edit in Taiwan, Germany, France and the US in the same changeset
Baloo Uriza (2025-08-27 14:02:31+00:00): Also just spot checking, you tagged lanes=4 on way 24006865 and 909692133, which obviously has six lanes in esri and bing imagery.  Is this fictionmapping?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171065738
sunny gw (2025-08-28 05:56:58+00:00): the most right lane is for motorcycle, does it count?
Baloo Uriza (2025-08-28 12:05:52+00:00): All travel lanes count regardless of mode.
AndyB_66 (2025-08-30 08:29:11+00:00): Wprowadziłeś błędną kombinację znaczników - popraw to, proszę
maraf24 (2025-09-04 09:24:14+00:00): Nie widzę tu nic błędnego.
Analogicznie mógłbym twierdzić, że surface=asphalt tutaj jest błędną kombinacją znaczników - bo wszak asfaltu tu nie ma.
eggie (2025-08-27 09:44:41+00:00): Dag Wdl,

Wanneer paden nog herkenbaar zijn dan taggen we disused:highway=path  Het zal dan niet meer renderen op de kaart en voorkomt opnieuw intekenen.
Ook lijkt het me verstandig om de landuse netjes te laten aansluiten en dus de witruimte te verwijderen.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-08-27 09:50:04+00:00): Ik heb wat witruimte verwijderd, maar ik zie hier veel meer disused:highway=....  
Daar kan de witruimte ook weg door netjes de nodes van de vlakken te verbinden. Het voorkomt opnieuw intekenen.
MVG
eggie
Hufkratzer (2025-08-27 20:44:36+00:00): Hi,
You have retagged https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/897335925 from a building to a horse riding centre. But this area does look like a building, not like horse riding centre. Here is some information on how to map a horse riding centre: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a#Riding_centre_(equestrian) , https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/409319823 (example)
impiaaa (2025-08-27 17:22:47+00:00): Is it? When I surveyed it in person it looked like a place where you'd buy pool tables, and that's reflected in the name, and on a website that seems to be them.
impiaaa (2025-08-27 17:24:15+00:00): Oh, I got it backwards, you just removed the sport= tag. I don't really know if that tag means you can play a sport at a place—it's used to specify which sports a sports store covers, for example.
Black_Diamond (2025-08-27 17:37:30+00:00): Yes, I removed the sport tag. I was following this quote from the Wiki documentation.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sport

> The sport=* tag is used to identify one or more sports which can be played within or on some physical feature.
impiaaa (2025-08-31 17:21:13+00:00): I feel like that's an oversimplification. Like, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dsports :

> sport=* if shop focuses on specific sport or sports

It's a qualifier tag that specifies what sport is associated with a feature. If it's a feature like leisure=pitch where sports are played, then that sport is played there. You usually don't play sports at a shop=sports but you can use sport=* on a shop=sports to say which sports equipment you can buy there. Similar to cuisine=*, which is usually used on amenity=restaurant/fast_food, but can also be used on shop=supermarket, even though you don't always eat food at a supermarket.
Black_Diamond (2025-09-01 03:42:24+00:00): Fair enough. I've switched it from a furniture store to a sporting goods store that sells billiards supplies. The previous combination was still wrong, and the new combination matches the documentation that you provided.
impiaaa (2025-09-01 17:10:39+00:00): I still think it's a misinterpretation to call a tag "wrong" just because of a minor wording choice on a wiki page that someone wrote. A tag is only "wrong" if it incorrectly describes the real world. OSM doesn't have a strict schema, the wiki is only there for guidance.
Black_Diamond (2025-09-01 17:48:28+00:00): It seemed wrong that it was both a furniture store and a place to play a sport. It seems to be a more accurate representation if it’s a sporting goods store that sells a set of specific sporting goods, which is what the current set of tags have now. I’m sure that this place sells things related to billiards that isn’t furniture.
impiaaa (2025-11-03 21:48:29+00:00): Fixed the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Key:sport&oldid=2915316
AndyB_66 (2025-08-30 09:01:04+00:00): https://s8-jordanow-lagiewniki.gddkia.gov.pl/rozpoczecie-robot/
AndyB_66 (2025-08-30 09:02:48+00:00): https://s8-jordanow-lagiewniki.gddkia.gov.pl/galerie/zdjecia-z-ziemi-18-08-24-08-2025/
AndyB_66 (2025-08-30 09:06:00+00:00): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ssTffNxiyQU