piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Taya_S (2025-12-10 13:25:14+00:00): OpenStreetMap is not intended to be used to map fantasy project. Please tell your classroom to cease using OpenStreetMap for its dam projects. 

The edits that have been peformed by your group in this area recently have been destructive as they were of very low quality and did not align with reality.

Furthermore the notes left behind in this area have been nothing but meaningless spam. Notes are intended to give feedback to other mappers about missing or outdated features. They are not intended to be used for classroom projects.
pertile (2025-12-05 17:11:52+00:00): Me parece muy bueno que los vecinos quieran ver el nombre de su calle en el mapa y que puedas resolver el problema con Openstreetmap. La duda que tengo es si el nombre es real, ya que esos terrenos no figuran loteados en Catastro. Según la Municipalidad de Resistencia están dentro de los predios a regularizar. Por tanto, lo más probable es que esa calle no tenga nombre real, salvo que haya algún documento del Municipio donde muestre que el lote esté avanzado incluyendo nombres de calles.
Dardug (2025-12-05 22:13:17+00:00): Hola Pertile muchas gracias por el aporte. En realidad los vecinos en estos barrios (asentamientos) realizan proyecciones de otras calles o toman en cuenta datos que le brindan las aplicaciones como UBER para dar nombres a las calles. El nombre completo de la calle es Doctor Alfredo Parodi.
pertile (2025-12-06 15:12:23+00:00): Ese es un poco el punto, que aparezca en Uber no puede ser fuente para nosotros. Uber usa GMaps, con lo cual sería traer datos de allí. De todas maneras, lo que nos compete es que el dato sea real, y eso implica validar el dato, algo difícil cuando no tenemos acceso a mapas oficiales, o como probablemente sea este el caso, que no haya un nombre oficial. Si en ese lugar hay varias casas que dicen Parodi xxx entonces OK, podemos decir que es el nombre de la calle "en el terreno" que es una de las políticas de OSM aunque no sea oficial. Ahora si eso es el comentario de vecinos que luego no se plasma en el terreno no corresponde. Por poner otro ejemplo en contrario, en el barrio Emerenciano pusieron nombres Che Guevara y similares, que después hasta los carteles se sacaron. O sea que podríamos estar contribuyendo a la difusión de un nombre que no existe.
pertile (2025-12-06 15:13:35+00:00): Te invito al canal de Telegram de OSM Argentina, donde se puede hablar de estas cosas https://telegram.me/osm_ar

Tenemos hasta un canal para Chaco y Corrientes.
SereneDeluge (2026-06-21 18:40:36+00:00): Hello!
I see that you've added sidewalk=no on a bunch of footpaths. Typically the tag is used on roads to denote if there are parallel sidewalks to it ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sidewalk?uselang=en ).
If you want to specify that a path is not a sidewalk it's better to pick an appropriate value for footway=? instead.

I'm gonna remove the tag, and keep your other changes, let me know if you disagree with it. Cheers!
Tjuro (2025-12-02 19:12:36+00:00): Beste Carkedykus,

Ik zie dat je hier een aantal landuse=retail vlakken hebt toegevoegd, hierbij zijn de vlakken aan de bestaande wegen geplakt.

Het is niet de bedoeling dat vlakken aan wegen geplakt worden.

Ik zou graag zien dat je dit oplost.

Met vriendelijke groet,

Tjuro
Carkedykus (2025-12-12 14:47:09+00:00): Hallo Tjuro,

Ik neem nog even het bericht terug van wat ik eerder stuurde bij jouw revertaanpassing, blijkbaar krijg ik nergens te zien dat ik een comment heb ontvangen.

Ik zal kijken of ik nieuwe vlakken kan maken die los staan van de wegen, ik twijfelde ook al over de keuze, omdat wegen aanpassen best vervelend kan zijn als zo'n vlak eraan vastzit. Anderzijds zijn wegen natuurlijk wel mooie, duidelijke en goede grenzen vanaf waar je een retail area kan aangeven.
Tjuro (2025-12-12 16:56:36+00:00): Beste Carkedykus,

Excuses voor het moeten terugdraaien van de wijzigingen. Dit doe ik liever niet. Hoewel vlakken plakken aan wegen niet per definitie fout is, levert dit dusdanig problemen op met het later wijzigen van ofwel de wegen ofwel de vlakken dat we met elkaar hebben afgesproken dit niet meer te doen.

Dit komt doordat dit twee verschillende type data is, vlakgericht gaat direct over vierkante meters, het is erbinnen of erbuiten. Terwijl lijngericht juist geen breedte heeft. Het is dus ok om lijngericht aan lijngericht te plakken en vlakgericht aan vlakgericht.

Wat dit probleem versterkt is dat plakken binnen OSM niet schematisch iets is maar dat in de interne datastructuur alles direct met elkaar in verbinding staat, voor wegen is dit handig, maar dit zorgt er ook voor dat losmaken soms moeilijker is dan nodig.

De editor ID heeft een aantal features die soms handig zijn en soms ook onhandig zijn. Een hiervan is het automatisch plakken. Ik ben zelf niet zo bekend met ID en gebruik voornamelijk JOSM waarbij dit plakken meer een bewuste keuze is. Ik raad zeker aan om een keer JOSM te proberen. In JOSM is het ook makkelijker om meerdere bronnen over elkaar heen te leggen zoals DKK, BGT AHN. Deze bronnen kunnen helpen bij het meer accuraat tekenen van dit soort vlakken.

Voor meer info zie: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/de-beste-imagery-layers-om-nl-osm-te-mappen-met-josm/85393
 
Met vriendelijke groet,

Tjuro
b-jazz (2025-12-03 03:54:50+00:00): RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1455333590

When drawing golf course areas (such as greens, fairways, bunkers, tees, etc.), please be aware that the ways used to outline those areas can't cross over each other. Fairway outlines shouldn't cross over greens or bunkers or other fairways for example. If you could go back and clean up where you've made this mistake, that would be helpful. But more importantly, if you could stop from doing this in the future, it would be greatly appreciated. Please read the wiki for instructions and examples of how to better map golf courses: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls. If you have any questions about golf course mapping, feel free to reach out.
maddog107 (2025-12-03 05:24:59+00:00): So i read the wiki, and i dont really see where i made the mistake. When i zoom in i dont see any of my ways overlapping and i tried to share polygons if they touch. Could you tell me the specific thing you want me to change so that i wont do it again in the future, and so i can fix it? Thx!
b-jazz (2025-12-03 18:03:30+00:00): My bad. I initially left it broken so you could see the problem but then as I was fixing other errors, I came back to it again and not realizing it was one I mentioned to you, I went ahead and fixed it again. I'll let you know if I see another example.

Thanks for getting back to me.
NeisBot (2025-12-01 23:26:11+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your changesets and noticed that the cumulative count of your recent edits (2 changesets) shows that 388 of your last 392 changes were deletions. This is quite an unusual proportion, so I wanted to check with you.

Could you please confirm whether these deletions were intentional or if they may have occurred by mistake?

#DeletionsCheck #Cumulative
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?uid=23567825
pitscheplatsch (2025-12-02 05:33:36+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175383594

#vandalism
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-26 19:31:53+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags/values, as a building inside another building, in changeset 184663651

https://osm.org/changeset/184663651
KennyDap (2025-12-02 02:57:33+00:00): Vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175383572
KennyDap (2025-12-02 02:57:08+00:00): Vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175383567
KennyDap (2025-12-02 02:56:27+00:00): Vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175383559
Jeffrey Friedl (2026-04-05 13:47:08+00:00): 自転車は一方通行のフィルドを消すこと忘れた。
czebureks (2025-12-01 23:45:18+00:00): Cześć! Ponawiam apel o niestosowanie aktualnie zdjęć Bing dla Gdańska - używanie tego podkładu stosuje niewielkimi (acz istotnymi przy mikromapowaniu) przesunięciami.
Wise_Turtle (2026-04-19 12:46:44+00:00): У вас проставлены теги bisycle=no на лесных тропах, но там нет запрета для движения на велосипеде.  Этот тег распространяется на юридический запрет, а не на физическую невозможность проезда.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:access
Wise_Turtle (2026-04-19 12:54:12+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:bicycle%3Dno
Kovoschiz (2025-12-02 09:39:31+00:00): Thank you for correcting `lanes=2` , but please don't remove `passing_places=yes` when adding `lanes=1`
Hufkratzer (2025-12-02 00:01:14+00:00): Hi,
I have retagged https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1455297112 according to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a#Riding_centre_(equestrian)

In JOSM you can tag riding arenas with the preset for sport=equestrian.
Hufkratzer (2025-12-02 00:10:31+00:00): Oops, this comment was meant for a different change set: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175372511
Fizzie-DWG (2025-12-02 04:52:21+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19065
5m4u9 (2025-12-02 15:39:55+00:00): Hola, qué fuente usas para subir la categoría de las vías? 

en la info oficial (PTDI de viacha) no menciona las vías para camiones, pero este tu cambio medio que tiene sentido.

Siguiente estas vías que editas que es permitido camiones, creo que lo mejor es cambiar a "trunk" para que tenga continuidad las carreteras nacionales...
5m4u9 (2025-12-02 15:41:08+00:00): la de arriba F19 y la de abajo F43.
5m4u9 (2025-12-02 15:34:08+00:00): Hola, 

hmmm... grassland?? no parece por el lugar rodeado de bosque, quizá en el beni pasando el río beni (derecha).

Esto más parece meadow con meadow=pasture porque parece bosque talado para pastoreo....
woodpeck (2025-12-04 08:56:55+00:00): regarding the replacing of "St." with "Saint" in place names, please see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/st-stephen-new-brunswick-or-saint-stephen/130485 and participate in that discussion before you repeat this kind of edit.
Sylabowy Kot (2025-12-02 06:12:13+00:00): Please don't waste changeset description field for a self-promotion - it's another mappers job to review your changes.
349179440 (2025-12-02 01:08:38+00:00): Forgot to add sources:
Bing Maps
Local Knowledge (i used to go here)
Google Maps
silversurfer83 (2025-12-02 05:02:05+00:00): Hello again :)

Thank you for improving your comments and for giving your sources.

Here is one very important piece if information:

Google explicitly forbids using their map products to improve other maps. We keep to that so gMaps can not be used as a source to improve our database!

Happy mapping
349179440 (2025-12-04 00:43:03+00:00): alright I understand I will not use gMaps from not on, Bing is still ok right?
silversurfer83 (2025-12-04 05:37:34+00:00): Our best source is going places and surveying them in person.

Then, as a rule of thumb, you can use everything you can find in the editor when you log on to osm.org and click the "edit" button (as you did here). You can switch between background images and use what's available there.

Cheers
349179440 (2025-12-04 12:53:10+00:00): Thanks for the clarification!
: )
Fizzie-DWG (2025-12-02 05:09:02+00:00): DWG revert - improper deletions

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175385308
Fizzie-DWG (2025-12-02 05:08:27+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19070
NorthCrab_upload (2025-12-02 01:21:02+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4212948095
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/423572982

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
KennyDap (2025-12-02 02:56:00+00:00): Vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175383555
Fizzie-DWG (2025-12-02 04:59:09+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19067
b-jazz (2025-12-09 23:36:44+00:00): RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1455348653

Please don't share the nodes of the green if you have the fairway surrounding the green. If you can't see any fringe around the green, you should make the fairway butt up to the green and share the nodes on the boundary *between* the green and fairway instead. Please read the wiki for visual examples and instructions on how to better map golf courses: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls. If you have any questions, please let me know and I'll gladly help clarify things. Thanks!
KennyDap (2025-12-02 02:55:35+00:00): Vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175383551
KennyDap (2025-12-02 02:55:00+00:00): Vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175383546
Fizzie-DWG (2025-12-02 04:50:31+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19064
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-12-02 02:52:05+00:00): Did I say, "Corrected road direction"? I meant that I re-aligned road geometry based on... Blah, blah, blah, it's too long and verbose to list here.
nicerain (2025-12-04 03:49:57+00:00): 若我加入historic标签可标记吗
hahae (2025-12-04 13:06:02+00:00): 你好，不可以的，加入这个标签是表示一个现在存在的东西，具有历史价值，比如说天坛故宫这种古迹，才可以用这个标签，已经不存在的东西，是不能加的
hahae (2025-12-04 13:07:04+00:00): 你如果实在是感兴趣，你可以去open historical Map去加，是专门加这种消失的东西的
nicerain (2025-12-04 14:01:18+00:00): 我都不知道聽誰的了，另外一個人說讓我加上歷史標籤
hahae (2025-12-04 14:08:41+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Historic
hahae (2025-12-04 14:09:04+00:00): 仔细看一下，这个上面明确写了，已经不存在的东西是不画的
hahae (2025-12-04 14:09:25+00:00): For features which no longer exist see Comparison of life cycle concepts and Date namespace.
nicerain (2025-12-04 14:09:28+00:00): 而且，清華大學內也有許多已消失的村，他標的為何沒被刪除
hahae (2025-12-04 14:09:57+00:00): rather we map things which are still observable
hahae (2025-12-04 14:10:08+00:00): 因为我还没来得及去删
hahae (2025-12-04 14:11:07+00:00): 我删了你的一部分是因为你几天了也没有回复，所以我就直接删了你的。我也给他发信息了，这两天他要是不回，我也要去删的
hahae (2025-12-04 14:12:21+00:00): 以及这个 https://www.openstreetmap.org/welcome
nicerain (2025-12-04 14:57:01+00:00): 我看他標的很早，有一些都快一年了，為什麼就你刪啊
nicerain (2025-12-04 15:08:43+00:00): It should be considered that historical objects of which there are no visible traces left normally do not belong into the main OSM database. Several initiatives exist to build historical maps with own databases. As an exception apparently many mappers think extensive history of object names is worth recording in main database.
nicerain (2025-12-04 15:09:24+00:00): 这句话好像没有明确说
nicerain (2025-12-04 15:13:57+00:00): 生命周期/状态命名空间前缀可用于标注具有诸如proposed（提议）, planned（规划）, construction（建设）, disused（弃用）, abandoned（废弃）, demolished（拆除）, historic（历史）状态的对象。另见生命周期概念对比。

示例: disused:amenity=pub, construction:amenity=parking, proposed:lanes=2
通过使用这个键前缀，可以确保当前或古老的应用程序不会混淆那些不存在或功能不全的对象，只有能识别到这个标签概念的软件才会应用它们。
Fizzie-DWG (2025-12-02 05:05:37+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19069
TheNightRider (2026-01-05 06:32:56+00:00): 5-alarm fire at this place on 2025-01-02. Might be burned to the ground:
https://www.9news.com/article/news/local/colorado-news/denver-apartment-fire-impacts-businesses/73-24993e89-0117-40ff-b99d-ebe92f2f31a3
TheNightRider (2026-01-05 06:34:47+00:00): This will probably have to be scraped. Video at: https://www.9news.com/article/news/local/fire-leetsdale-holly/73-ebb1f5e3-fe73-410c-b739-fe99a7bd4a52?tbref=hp
felipeeugenio (2025-12-02 12:48:23+00:00): Hola. por favor no usar nombres descriptivos en  los caminos.
Además, una ex escuela, no es una escuela. Hice ambas correcciones. Saludos y gracias
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175383165
Cristian Velozo (2025-12-02 16:05:49+00:00): La escuela es un punto de referencia en la zona y su acceso es una camino señalizado por letreros municipales  y de acceso público. Una lástima que lo hayas eliminado.
felipeeugenio (2025-12-02 16:53:24+00:00): Hola. No se habló de eliminar nada.
Solo de no usar un nombre descriptivo para el camino y el tag de escuela en algo que no es una escuela.

Saludos
Fizzie-DWG (2025-12-02 05:02:55+00:00): As long as you continue to vandalise the OSM map, yes, we will continue to fix it! Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19068
TrickyFoxy (2026-01-01 17:10:10+00:00): это название заведения или что сюда можно с собаками?
hoserab (2025-12-02 19:23:42+00:00): Ha, I drove past and noticed the "Puffin Palace" vape shop this morning, and was going to add it, but you beat me to the punch! :P
KennyDap (2025-12-02 04:41:51+00:00): Vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175384858
KennyDap (2025-12-02 04:39:49+00:00): Vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175384831
KennyDap (2025-12-02 04:39:26+00:00): Vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175384827
Fizzie-DWG (2025-12-02 04:54:55+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19066
JoeG (2025-12-31 00:43:16+00:00): Hi! I intend to revert deleted fences and footway=sidewalk in this one.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175384819
adreamy (2026-06-03 06:14:29+00:00): 도움이 필요하시면 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ko:첫_걸음 문서를 봐 주시고, 연습이나 테스트는 https://apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/ 에서 해 보실 수 있습니다.
OSM에서 가짜 정보를 매핑하는 경우 훼손행위로 오해를 받아 계정에 제재를 받을 수도 있습니다.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-12-02 05:12:12+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19071
Glassman (2025-12-02 22:09:05+00:00): If you check the counties parcel map, https://www.skagitcounty.net/Maps/iMap/?mapjs=parcel this road is named. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States_roads_tagging#National_Forest_Road_System suggests how to add FR1570 as a ref tag. Can you review the documents and update osm? I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175385158
Fizzie-DWG (2025-12-02 05:34:59+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19073
Fizzie-DWG (2025-12-02 05:32:02+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19072
willkmis (2025-12-02 14:16:34+00:00): Hi Yushclay, I can't say I agree with tagging this road as highway=trunk + expressway=yes. It seems like you've been on a flurry of reclassifications across SoCal, can you explain what logic you're using here? These seem to violate the agreed consensus on the classifications page (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/California/2022_Highway_Classification_Guidelines) by signficantly expanding the definition of highway=trunk in California to include nearly any "built-up" road.
willkmis (2025-12-02 14:24:05+00:00): I should add, a lot of discussion of highway classification in the US goes on on the OSMUS Slack, you're welcome to join there! https://openstreetmap.us/get-involved/slack/

The #highway-classification and #local-california channels are probably most relevant here
Yushclay (2025-12-02 17:33:35+00:00): Yeah, I guess I went too far for this one. I'll undo it.
The logic I was going with was expressway being mostly controlled access with and little to no contact with the opposing direction outside of intersections.
tastrax (2025-12-02 05:59:51+00:00): Dont suppose you got a photo of the sign?
S1nus (2025-12-02 06:12:56+00:00): i have the photo from the entry on top end (the houses). i can upload. csn tell me where (haven't done before on OMS)
tastrax (2025-12-02 06:19:15+00:00): There is Mapillary if you have an account and if the image has location data? I will send a PM to you.
S1nus (2025-12-02 06:26:48+00:00): up till now, i didn't use mapillary. 1) does it need seperate account or can i use my OSM account? 2) as i'm traveling , i only have a tablet, assuming that there is a mapillary spp as well (for base changes i'm uskng vespucci) 3) image does have location data
tastrax (2025-12-02 09:05:44+00:00): Yep completely seperate to OSM (Actually owned by Meta these days). They do have an app in each of the stores but you can also upload geotagged images (from a phone or action camera etc) via  computer and an upload program. The images eventually make it to a location where we can use them in OSM.
user_5359 (2025-12-02 08:25:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice the difference between a name and a description. 
If you need more information (and cannot find any examples or ask anyone else), please visit our wiki at https://wiki.osm.org.
I have reverted your changes.
NeisBot (2025-12-13 22:10:07+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Dog training service"

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description
NeisReview (2025-12-13 22:40:17+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/175390509
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-22 06:10:28+00:00): Only spammy tags have been added to a node of a highway ...
gscholz (2026-03-04 06:54:47+00:00): Hi maptactics,
your recent edit have left behind a huge amount of errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=92.86200&lat=56.02972&zoom=10&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges

As you may know, this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps. Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
mavl (2025-12-13 10:35:40+00:00): Здравствуйте. Пакет правок добавляет непрямоугольное здание.
Ozon OSM6 (2025-12-13 11:51:52+00:00): Здравствуйте. Спасибо, что поправили, постараюсь повнимательнее смотреть снимки
felipeeugenio (2025-12-02 12:24:18+00:00): Hello. The road is clearly under the ground and it is clearly private, please do take your time when mapping these things.
Regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175387089
pitscheplatsch (2025-12-05 14:03:12+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

Is this just a test?

Best regards, Pascal
pitscheplatsch (2025-12-07 08:35:38+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175393117
adreamy (2026-06-03 06:13:50+00:00): 도움이 필요하시면 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ko:첫_걸음 문서를 봐 주시고, 연습이나 테스트는 https://apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/ 에서 해 보실 수 있습니다.
OSM에서 가짜 정보를 매핑하는 경우 훼손행위로 오해를 받아 계정에 제재를 받을 수도 있습니다.
user_5359 (2025-12-02 08:22:14+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Sorry, but business entries without addresses are not in line with OSM. Please add the street and house number, or we will have to mark this as SPAM.
I have now reverted your changes.
NeisBot (2025-12-13 22:10:09+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Dermatology clinic in the Hamptons"

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description
NeisReview (2025-12-13 22:39:54+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/175390320
NeisBot (2025-12-13 22:10:11+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Law firm in Miami"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-12-13 22:39:19+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/175390284