piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
zstadler (2026-05-06 16:41:53+00:00): Hello Bezetha,

Thank you for your contributions to OSM.

I assume you changed the highway tag to footway in order to clarify it is not suitable for bicycles or mountain bikes.

In the outdoors, the proper way to so that is with 
highway=path + bicycle=no

The OSM wiki recommends the use of highway=path for "either paved or with smooth surface (compacted, wood or similar)", usually in an urban setting, that wheelchairs could use:

> Footways tend to be constructed and either paved or with smooth surface (compacted, wood or similar). The elderly and small children and wheelchair users can use them with ease. They tend to be in urban settings.
Bezetha (2026-05-06 16:51:27+00:00): A footway in such a topo map relates to a narrow, often unmarked and unbitten single trail, unlike a "path" which specifies a marked and bitten.
This holds great importance when hiking by foot.
I hope this answers suffices in elaborating what should be regard as common knowledge.
zstadler (2026-05-06 17:02:44+00:00): First, I had a typo in my comment. It was meant to refer to highway=footway, based on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=footway?uselang=en-GB

The OSM wiki recommends the use of highway=footway for "either paved or with smooth surface (compacted, wood or similar)", usually in an urban setting, that wheelchairs could use:

From your description t is clear that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1303946167 is not "paved or with smooth surface" such that "The elderly and small children and wheelchair users can use them with ease." and it is not in urban settings.

highway=path with or without bicycle=no is appropriate also for unmarked rarely used paths.
Yog Sot (2026-05-04 22:08:47+00:00): a kiedy zostało zamkniete?
Fiszi37 (2026-05-06 13:47:23+00:00): W dniu 2026-05-04.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2026-05-06_remont_pieszego_przej%C5%9Bcia_kolejowego,_Pi%C4%85tkowo.jpg
Yog Sot (2026-05-07 10:41:42+00:00): ok, jedyne co, jak zwykle oznakowanie złe, bo zakaz rowerów dotyczy tylko ruchu na jezdni, a to nie jest jezdnia. Dodatkowo nie dotyczy hulajnóg elektrycznych np...
A zakaz ruchu pieszych dotyczy strony drogi z której ustawiony jest znak. 
Zakaz nie specjalnie dotyczy ludzi np na rolkach, bo formalnie to nie piesi.
rwblake (2026-05-14 21:19:21+00:00): Hiya. I don't believe this is a public footpath but if it is then you should use designation=public_footpath
foot=designated
prow_ref=*. I can't tell from aerial imagery that bicycles are prohibited but I may be mistaken. It wasn't mapped as a bridleway before, only a path.
felipeeugenio (2026-05-04 14:29:30+00:00): Hola Cristobal. por favor no agregar nombres descriptivos ni genéricos.

Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182206101
felipeeugenio (2026-05-04 14:38:05+00:00): Hola Cristóbal. Estuve revisando tus mapeos. Es claro cuales son tus interes, pero es claro que necesitas ayuda. Porfa entra al chat de telegram, te podemos mostrar herramientas para que dibujes los senderos de manera bastante mas rápida y con mejores datos. (https://t.me/OSMcl/1).

Además de mostrarte de manera más gr+afica los errores que estás cometiendo, que se repiten edición tras edición. Lo que es normal. Etsamos para ayudar, pero para que vayas aprendiendo.

Saludos y gracias
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182206101
Mathias_ADAV (2026-05-13 07:52:34+00:00): Bonjour, je viens de voir que vous avez ajouter dans la relation V30 la partie entre Dury et Saint-Quentin. Au vu des informations que j'ai et après échange avec un cycliste local, nous avons un gros doute sur ce tracé. Avez-vous repéré un itinéraire jalonné sur place ? Le seul projet de véloroute dans le secteur est le long du canal de Saint-Quentin
Pmz (2026-05-13 08:11:38+00:00): Bonjour, je vous laisse modifier en fonction du terrain. J'ai juste complété le tracé en ayant pour source somme-tourisme.com et somme.fr qui me semblaient être des sources fiables.
Mathias_ADAV (2026-05-13 08:31:52+00:00): J'ai retrouvé : https://www.google.com/maps/d/u/0/viewer?mid=1lNauDLlAhhkhcQ2vlPU24IFCrj8&ll=49.712035646708635%2C3.3907842898437757&z=9 C'est indiqué : Suggestion d'itinéraire non-balisé de 35km. Départ des sources de la Somme (stationnement : parking des sources de la Somme, depuis la D70). Alternance de petites routes (nous vous recommandons la plus grande prudence) et chemin de halage sur le canal de Saint-Quentin puis le canal de la Somme jusqu’à Ham.
Mathias_ADAV (2026-05-13 08:32:15+00:00): Je retire donc car ce n'est pas la V30
Eifelkobold! (2026-05-04 23:13:18+00:00): Guten Tag, in diesem Änderungssatz wurden mehrere öffentliche Straßen gesperrt. Was ist der Grund für diese Änderungen und welche Quelle habt ihr genutzt?
Access Claims (komoot) (2026-05-06 15:31:06+00:00): vielen Dank für Ihre Nachricht.
Die vorgenommenen Änderungen wurden inzwischen wieder rückgängig gemacht, da es sich um einen Fehler unsererseits gehandelt hat. Wir entschuldigen uns für die entstandenen Unannehmlichkeiten.
felipeeugenio (2026-05-04 21:40:18+00:00): Hola. No sabemos cuál es el nombre de esas calles, pero razón que da nos resulta un poco extraña; Los caminos se llaman como se llaman. Si el prefijo resulta repetitivo es algo que no es relevante.

¿Qué dice la cartelería interna del condominio?
saludos y gracias
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182207107
felipeeugenio (2026-05-05 16:17:22+00:00): No hay respuesta del mapero, se reversa provisionalmente la edición.
silversurfer83 (2026-05-04 17:39:27+00:00): Moin kreidler-rider :)

kannst du mir den "Namen", den du hier vergeben hast, erklären?

Grüße

silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182207123
eggie (2026-05-04 14:50:06+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-05-04 14:53:24+00:00): Dag Ad,

Er zitten nu twee apotheken in dit pand . Klopt dat wel?

MVG
eggie
SpinnetjeInHetWeb (2026-05-04 15:54:58+00:00): Zo te zien had dit eigenlijk een aanpassing moeten zijn op:
node 2607529114. 
Deze was alleen niet zichtbaar in de Organic Maps applicatie
eggie (2026-05-04 16:43:24+00:00): Hoi.. die app is niet ideaal heb ik gemerkt.
Iets selecteren blijkt lastig.

Groet 
eggie
eggie (2026-05-04 17:27:03+00:00): Ik heb de info samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode en de andere apotheek verwijderd.
Matmat-25 (2026-05-05 16:44:23+00:00): je partage, par contre si changement il faut veiller à faire la modif également sur les area:highway
JassKurn (2026-05-04 16:26:26+00:00): Hi  benjaminevans82, 
You've made an error in this changeset. You've changed foot access from "designated" to "yes". As the way has a right-of-way by foot, the tag should be foot=designated. Links below give some guidance for UK PROW mapping
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Access_provisions_in_the_United_Kingdom#England_and_Wales
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Further_guidance_on_tagging_Public_Rights_of_Way_in_the_United_Kingdom

You've also converted the way from a path to a footway. Common around Dartmoor to map unmanged narrow ways as path  and (importantly) then add the other restrictions.

Jass
spiregrain (2026-05-04 16:26:21+00:00): Hi there.  From memory, these paths are marked pedestrian priority at all entry points to the park.   is these a reason you've changed them to cycle paths?
xyzl (2026-05-04 17:26:31+00:00): Hello, sorry - my understanding of the signs was it said that cycling was allowed on the path so I thought marking it as designated for both was more accurate, but happy to be corrected! Apologies if I've caused an issue.
spiregrain (2026-05-05 13:34:06+00:00): It's not an issue.  The routes are available for cycling and foot traffic.  It would be appropriate to make them bicycle designated and food designated.

However on the ground signage says that they are pedestrian priority.  (Unless it's worn away or been removed in the last couple of years).   I think that means it's not appropriate to mark them as highway=cycleway.   

What sort of cycleways would have pedestrian priority?
xyzl (2026-05-05 14:20:51+00:00): Ah, I see iD has it listed as the "cycle and footpath" preset in this arrangement as explained here under the "foot access on cycleways" section so I was under the impression this was best practice? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=cycleway
spiregrain (2026-05-06 10:41:16+00:00): I think iD is wrong to assume that - though it may be appropriate in most cases.   Here's a discussion on the subject - https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/tagging-a-way-that-has-a-road-marking-for-pedestrian-priority-cycle-slowly/7767 .

So I suppose, whoever is there next can check the signage (painted on on tarmac in big white circles at all the entrances to the park (last I looked)) and flip ti back to highway=footway if needs be.
Wildsharky (2026-05-06 05:08:10+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:182246748
Wildsharky (2026-05-06 04:51:55+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:182242615
eggie (2026-05-04 15:19:29+00:00): Hoi,

Het adres heb ik weer hersteld. Wanneer een winkel sluit graag de adresnode intact laten. Verwijder alleen de bedrijfsinfo.
MVG
eggie
De Ouwe Zeerover (2026-05-04 15:24:15+00:00): Hoi eggie, je hebt gelijk. Een beetje dom van mij..
eggie (2026-05-04 15:30:07+00:00): No problem.. 😀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-05-04 21:53:38+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13795521553
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/869460429

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Zit6650 (2026-05-05 07:58:46+00:00): Już naprawione. Dzięki za uwagę!
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-20 11:07:43+00:00): Reverted adding SEO POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags, likely sourced from Google Maps, in changeset 184348560

https://osm.org/changeset/184348560
HurricaneGator (2026-05-15 19:17:21+00:00): Hello FS Patagonia,

I noticed that you added destination=Calle Calandria;Calle Gallareta;Calle Tordo to (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/117143288). Panoramax from January 6th, 2025 (https://api.panoramax.xyz/en/index?s=fp;s2;pb8a7bb45-3453-4ac4-a1b2-8820d93ccb19;c68.35/-1.45/30;m17/-36.651437/-64.336305;udefault) and Mapillary from February 22nd, 2018 (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=315730733277113), unfortunately do not show a direct angle of the signage. Would you be able to share the source you used for this update? If you have access to more recent ground-level imagery or photos, would you be willing to upload them to an OSM-compatible platform such as Mapillary, KartaView, or Bing Streetside (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Street-level_imagery_services)? That would allow other contributors to verify and reference the signage as well.

Thanks in advance, and happy mapping!
eggie (2026-05-04 15:34:59+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback entrance=main is bedoeld voor gebouwen.
Een adresnode hoort op een gebouw en niet bij de weg. 
30 nov 2023 — Not all buildings with a side entrance need to use entrance = main . This tag should only be used for the primary entrance to a building
Zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:entrance=main
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
MapperrZPolski (2026-05-04 21:07:07+00:00): dzięki
Wildsharky (2026-05-06 05:09:01+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:182276272
Sharko_MV3 (2026-05-04 18:55:22+00:00): Just because these roads are private doesn't mean they have to be deleted...
bxl-forever (2026-05-04 23:41:38+00:00): Beste,

Ik had u graag op een positievere manier welkom geheten bij OSM, maar helaas moet ik u laten weten dat uw wijziging is afgekeurd.

Ook als het om privéterrein gaat, is het niet correct om deze paden te verwijderen. In plaats daarvan kunt u ze correct taggen als "private", zodat het probleem op de juiste manier wordt opgelost.

Op deze documentatiepagina wordt uitgelegd waarom dit belangrijk is: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property
Coconut Plucker (2026-05-05 05:00:43+00:00): Hallo,

Wat moet er dan gebeuren zodat deze niet meer ingepland kunnen worden via bepaalde route planners dat OSM gebruiken als map?

Als je rustig in u tuin bent er er lopen mensen rond omdat ze denken dat dit een openbare weg is omdat de gps het zegt is het alles buiten plezant! Privee eigendom is toch privee? Moet toch niet openbaar gemaakt worden omdat er “wegen” zijn?
Ik hoor het graag. 

Alvast bedankt

Alvast bedankt
Thibaultmol (2026-05-05 05:26:53+00:00): Het kan even duren tot de routeplanners geupdate zijn met de nieuwe data. Die van osm kan maximum 24 uur duren dacht ik. 
Maar derde partijen die openstreetmaat data gebruiken trekken deze misschien maar elke maand ofzo binnen
silversurfer83 (2026-05-18 18:33:33+00:00): access=no blocks this highway for every traffic mode! access=* is for legal access values. If the surface is bad for biking, proper surface=* and smoothness=* values need to be set. These need to be surveyed.

Please remove this access value
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182211205
fs_LT (2026-05-28 04:24:23+00:00): revert (+1)
silversurfer83 (2026-05-28 04:44:35+00:00): Thanks
eggie (2026-05-04 15:41:58+00:00): Wanneer je wil dat adresnode 13 vindbaar moet zijn kun je het beste de oprit niet op access=private zetten, maar op access=permissive. Idem voor het hek op de node.
Dat lijnelement hek kan beter weg.
Die routing:entrance wordt denk ik nauwelijks gebruikt in Europa. 
entrance=main uitsluitend voor een gebouw gebruiken.
MVG
eggie
Rutger 84 (2026-05-04 16:19:19+00:00): Hoi, thanks! Update verwerkt.
Wildsharky (2026-05-06 05:05:52+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:182244718
democat (2026-05-04 17:04:45+00:00): Hi there, why was the building deleted? Also, you cannot be copying data from Google Maps. https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Licence_and_Legal_FAQ#2.1.5._Can_I_copy_data_from_Google?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182212623
schobbish (2026-05-05 00:03:06+00:00): Reverted in changeset 180789642
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182212623
schobbish (2026-05-05 00:04:11+00:00): sorry, changeset 182227048
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-04 16:17:54+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
is the following name real?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/354611831
rarad74 (2026-05-10 16:29:52+00:00): Salut. In primul rand localitatatile TREBUIE sa aibe zona rezidentiala, asa cum este regula aplicata in toata tara. Nu trebuie stearsa zona rezidential doar ca sa fragmentam din zeci de poligoane de jur imprejurul localitatii. Imaginile BING sunt cele mai vech is imprecise in multe zone. Recomanda ESRI Standard sau MAPBOX.
mueschel (2026-05-05 10:32:32+00:00): Something went quite wrong here. It seems that most of these roads are duplicates of ones that already exist in OSM.
mueschel (2026-05-06 16:32:15+00:00): I reverted this changeset.
MappingMore (2026-05-07 17:41:46+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:182350386
QuiLe (2026-05-05 00:32:34+00:00): Hello there, you seem to be deleting history and making new ways and nodes. Is there any particular reason you are doing this? Please see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history
ika-chan! (2026-05-04 23:18:46+00:00): Hello, this changeset was reverted for reclassifying roads against current consensus: please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Greece/Highways for the current guidance. Please suggest any changes by creating a thread at https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/gr/68.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182226581
Leo Slager (2026-05-04 21:32:13+00:00): ij het bwwerken van de routerelaties is helaas wat misgegan.
De nieuwe wegen zijn boven in de routerelatie geplakt.
De wegen behoren na de stop_positions en de platforms te worden geplaatst en dan ook nog in de juiste volgorde.
Ik pas het even aan.
Tomas09 (2026-05-04 22:24:33+00:00): Dus het verkeerde identificatienummer in de relatie?
kubzon7 (2026-05-04 18:17:29+00:00): Tylko czy odcinek Żwirki i Wigury między Jaskółczą a Kossaka też został zamknięty? 

"Jak poruszać się po Górzyskowie?
W trakcie prac niezbędne jest zamknięcie odcinka ulicy Żwirki i Wigury od posesji nr 54 do skrzyżowania z ul. Skorupki." (https://zdmikp.bydgoszcz.pl/pl/drogi-miejskie/9282-budowa-zbiornikow-przyspiesza-sprawdz-jak-poruszac-sie-po-miescie). 

Budynek 54 wskazywałby na Podniebne Ogrody.
OlasMapy (2026-05-05 13:25:21+00:00): Ja widziałem że jest przejezdna w niektórych odcinkach ale płotki były na niej porozstawiane z napisem żeby nie wjeżdżać
NorthCrab_upload (2026-05-05 00:15:46+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Wielki Głęboczek":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/895945507
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/895945760
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/895945965

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
assanges (2026-05-04 17:18:32+00:00): See also changesets:
i. Flagged as bad edit: changeset/182185995
ii. Added new POI as follow up:
changeset/182215586
Didz (2026-05-08 17:34:48+00:00): Nice, I went through here around the same time but forgot to record a trace.
Gorger (2026-05-13 03:14:33+00:00): Hi Didz, thank you.
Dimitar155 (2026-05-04 17:08:33+00:00): https://www.pomorie.bg/new/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Отчет-решения-ноември-юни-2024.pdf
assanges (2026-05-04 17:17:40+00:00): See also changesets:
i. Flagged as bad edit: changeset/182185995
ii. Reverts the bad edit:
changeset/182215129
LordGarySugar (2026-05-13 16:20:28+00:00): Please use proper changeset comments, it's hard to know what you've changed from ';'
ajmat (2026-05-07 04:13:45+00:00): Reverted in changeset id: 182320198
rarad74 (2026-05-04 17:35:14+00:00): Hi. I dont see any street there. Maybe, at most a path. Could be private acces.

Please do not use Bing imagery because is very old. Use mapbox or esri standard instead. Thanks.
LakeNumto (2026-05-06 11:44:28+00:00): Hi rarad74, 
Thank you for reaching out. I will keep that in mind and defer to your edits.
Kovoschiz (2026-05-05 07:05:22+00:00): Please don't remove them, as I documented my ideas https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Generalized_directions
mueschel (2026-05-05 07:17:34+00:00): Please ask for comments before using any of this. The proposal is a mess of hundreds of tags instead of one simple one. There's no way to make any use of that data without thousands of lines of code and months of work. A symbol on a destination sign is not an aeroway or amenity.
Kovoschiz (2026-05-06 07:01:13+00:00): Why can't I use it to demonstrate it? How is all the mess of  random hundreds `destination:symbol=` values better? Do you opposite `destination:access:*=` and `indication:*=` ?
mueschel (2026-05-06 07:21:47+00:00): You can use the example section in the proposal to demonstrate them. 

Symbols are mostly a defined set of officially defined icons, these can easily be mapped to a single value of the symbol tag.
Many symbols don't have a direct equivalent in OSM main tags. There's one symbol for a place to eat - and it might refer to amenity = fast_food, restaurant, cafe, ... should all of these be tagged differently?


indication:* is different - marker signs always refers directly to an actual object in OSM.

destination:access:* is also different: The tags are referenced in the destination:symbol tag, so any software exactly knows what to look for.

Please don't try to discuss everything in changeset comments, start a thread in the forums.
Kovoschiz (2026-05-08 13:30:11+00:00): 1. What prohibits me from adding them into OSM? 
2. My question is about why they are worded, not using id as `traffic_sign=` does. They are also inconsistently named. If I accept that, there will still be a need  unless every app downloads or retrieves all eg `destination:brand:wikidata=` in some signs. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logo_sign 
3. Why does that  apply to `destination:*=` ? 
4. That's false for text-only signs 
5. You made this changeset. Of course I can ask about it here. I'm not trying to convince you to agree it. It's about you removing them.
Kovoschiz (2026-05-08 13:33:26+00:00): 4. Which can exist alongside symbols https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:UK_road_sign_with_destination_comment.svg
Manlio bones (2026-05-05 17:14:00+00:00): Perdonami, fammi capire. Stai cancellando tu i miei ultimi inserimenti o sbaglio? E sulla base di quali elementi e di quale investitura? C'è qualcosa che non conosco o che ho violato inavvertitamente? Grazie per una cortese risposta
MappingMore (2026-05-08 06:35:16+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:182367721
rajdhani (2026-05-05 08:46:08+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:182238492
t_ja (2026-05-04 20:14:58+00:00): Ahoj,
aký je dôvod premenovávania vrcholov na spoločnej hranici dvoch štátov len na český názov? Obzvlášť keď boli pridané zo slovenského zdroja...
Taktiež nie je dôvod odmazávať tagy "wikidata" a "wikipedia" ☹️
Ondřej Hasník (2026-05-05 12:29:03+00:00): Dobrý den,

mylně jsem se domníval, že se uživatelům s českou lokací zobrazí jen český název a uživatelům se slovenskou lokací jen slovenský název, což tak bohužel není. Wikidata se mi povedlo smazat nějak omylem, ani jsem si toho nevšiml. Hlavní název sem tedy vrátil na dvoujazyčný podle https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multilingual_names. Za způsobené nepříjemnosti se velmi omlouvám.

S pozdravem a přáním pěkného dne

Ondřej Hasník
t_ja (2026-05-06 20:19:55+00:00): Vďaka za opravu 👍
mavl (2026-06-07 06:01:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183764451, 183764460, 183764431, 183764453, 183764448, 183764459, 183764455 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20768].
literan (2026-05-04 19:11:52+00:00): зачем дубли создаете?
MaliMrav (2026-05-05 08:11:43+00:00): Zdravo Enotramone,

Da li se restoran zove "Sur sport etno kuća Lepenski vir"? Ili su u pitanju dva odvojena biznisa (npr. "Sur sport" i "Etno kuća Lepenski vir"?)

Takođe, nije jasno da li je "Sur" ili "Sut".

Pozdrav,
MaliMrav
enotramone (2026-05-06 12:30:23+00:00): Zdravo MaliMrav,

Bio sam ovde i video sam odnu tablu: "Ресторан сур спорт етно кућа лепенски вир" — nije jasno čto eto jedno ili nekoliko mest. Promenio sam 1x1 kako je bilo na tabli
MaliMrav (2026-05-12 09:11:55+00:00): Ok, ostaviću onda tako, samo sam ispravio latinični naziv (Sut -> Sur).
enotramone (2026-05-12 09:14:30+00:00): Havala!
Pozdrav
Bienson (2026-05-05 04:57:04+00:00): Es gibt einen Unterschied zwischen name=* und operator=*. Der Name des Unternehmens ist "WADRA", der Operator "WADRA GmbH".
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-05-23 05:50:00+00:00): Reverted due to adding a SEO spam POI with just a malformed name=* and image=* tag

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183051273
fs_LT (2026-05-28 12:37:48+00:00): was ist das? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1509167178
silversurfer83 (2026-05-04 20:01:35+00:00): Danke.

(wir haben seit einiger Zeit das Schlüssel-Wert-Paar board:title=* welches für die "Überschrift" einer Infotafel genutzt wird, da viele die Nutzung von name=* an dieser Stelle für falsch halten. Soll dir jetzt aber erstmal nur zur Info dienen)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182218660