piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
tsinoitisoppo (2025-12-14 20:41:12+00:00): https://tw.waw.pl/system-informacji-pasazerskiej/
Anas masuris (2025-12-14 20:45:19+00:00): Zapomniałeś w nazwach dywizów (-). Na przyszłość, obowiązkiem jest podawanie źródeł, więc podawaj xd
tsinoitisoppo (2025-12-14 20:51:08+00:00): xd na wyświetlaczach przystankowych nie ma dywizów (wstępnie nie sprawdziłem SIS)
Anas masuris (2025-12-14 20:55:06+00:00): Przy innych takich łączonych nazwach jest dywiz (bo jednocześnie oba miejsca występują), więc i tu się pojawią (bez sensu by było, żeby w systemie było inaczej) np. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11247694159
democat (2025-12-15 06:22:06+00:00): Hey again, thanks for the edits! The comment for the other edit stands: school tags are better on School Grounds areas rather than individual points, unless the school is only one part of an existing building. For Jones MS, the point looks a little misplaced - and that too, would be better as a School Grounds area if possible.
pippo6 (2026-07-14 11:18:16+00:00): hai cancellato cestini esistenti
SMoONF (2025-12-18 10:02:14+00:00): Salut @
As-tu vu cet échange récent sur les Archives Départementales :
https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/normalisation-des-archives-departementales

Le tag "government=archives" a été mis en avant pour ces structures (plutôt que "amenity=archive" que tu as utilisé).

Si tu ne penses pas que c'est satisfaisant, n'hésite pas à participer au sujet sur le Forum 😀
SMoONF (2025-12-18 10:02:52+00:00): (pardon, je voulais commencer par "Salut @Alba Clara mais j'ai oublié de copier/coller ton pseudo 😉)
SMoONF (2025-12-18 10:04:25+00:00): ooops, je viens de voir que c'est toi qui avais justement ouvert ce sujet, désolé !
Mais du coup, pourquoi pas  "government=archives" ?
Alba Clara (2025-12-18 20:03:12+00:00): parce que sur taginfo on a 913 government=archive et 9 government=archives.
Sylvain M (2026-04-03 12:49:09+00:00): (je répond depuis mon compte perso, mais c'est bien la même personne)

Tu as raison pour "government=archive" (plutôt que archives), et je n'avais pas fait attention à cette subtilité de pluriel !
Ma question était surtout sur le choix de "amenity=archive" plutôt que "government=archive" :)

Pas de souci, c'est harmonisé maintenant !
captain_slow (2025-12-14 22:11:32+00:00): Vielen Dank für diese Anpassungen. Wahnsinns Arbeit!
paulbrunner (2025-12-30 09:50:01+00:00): Auch von mir vielen Dank! Als ich die Ankündigung für diese grosse Fahrplanumstellung sah (und besonders auch die Sachen, die wegen der Baustelle am HB "nur" 1 Jahr so sind), dachte ich schon, das wird viel Arbeit und man braucht idealerweise einen guten Plan, was man dann in einem Jahr macht bzgl. der temporären Änderungen. Super, dass Du schon gleich am Umstellungsdatum die Anpassungen dafür gemacht hast, danke für Deinen grossen Einsatz!
Jakka (2026-01-22 12:54:25+00:00): access=disabled dit betekent toegang andersvaliden
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disabled
De link naar info is onbestaande
Heb access=no gezet. Graag melding als weg terug open is na werken
arjunaraoc (2025-12-17 04:25:35+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175926668
user_5359 (2025-12-14 20:04:54+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Thanks for your addition!

You only added the name of a business to the building, but did not note that there is also a business there.   If you do not know the spelling of the tag, please look it up in the wiki https://wiki.osm.org.
FajrAl (2025-12-17 12:53:30+00:00): Press Q to square the building
Gregory Peony (2025-12-15 02:05:43+00:00): Thank you for your contribution! 

The vast majority of footprints here represent buildings.

After tracing and tagging features which are likely square or round, please remember to square their corners `q`, or circularise them `o`, because it is almost impossible and time consuming to draw shapes so percisely manually. Buildings with metal or pitched roofs tend to have square corners; round buildings are identifiable by the distinctive cresent shaped shadow they cast. Unless the building is clearly a different shape then it's best to assume that it should be rounded or its corners should be squared. In the ID Editor, you can `right click` for access to editing functions. Since roofs tend to overhang walls trace the initial shape slightly smaller to allow a buffer for any change in size which may occur. In JOSM use the [buildingstools plugin](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/BuildingsTools). In ID you must draw the shape accurately enough if you want every corner to be squared. This [video about squaring features in ID](https://youtu.be/Xs5wX592E1o) has more information and a demo.

Keep on mapping!
silversurfer83 (2025-12-14 20:36:53+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen als aktiver Mapper :)

schön, dass du selbst mit anpackst. Bänke sehen gut aus und wenn du magst können sie noch mehr Details wie Rückenlehne (backrest) und Armlehne (armrest) und Blickrichtung (direction) vertragen. Alles kein Muss, nur wenn du die Informationen kennst.

Wenn du Fragen hast, immer raus damit und wenn du durch Korbach wanderst meld dich

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175927293
Wandergecko (2025-12-15 09:13:16+00:00): Danke für die Kontrolle. 
Mehr Details zu den Bänken habe ich auch bei anderen Bänken selten bis nie gesehen; daher habe ich bisher nur auf Besonderheiten geachtet wie Liegebank, KEINE Rückenlehne, Mülleiner usw. 
In Korbach war ich kürzlich auf dem Weg zu meiner Edersee-Wanderung, bin einmal den Stadtmauerring gelaufen beim Warten auf den Anschlusszug. Da habe ich auch noch ein paar Notizen, die ich demnächst nachtragen kann. 
Gibt es eine Methode, in OSMAND Änderungen offline einzutragen und später hochzuladen? Derzeit setze ich mir Marker, die ich dann manuell am PC abarbeite.
silversurfer83 (2025-12-16 21:42:34+00:00): Hmmm...

Gute Frage. Mit OsmAnd mappe ich sehr selten. Am Smartphone nutze ich lieber vespucci, das erlaubt höhere Präzision beim Setzen der Punkte und Wege (in vielen Bundesländern sind die amtlichen Orthophotos verfügbar, die sehr genau ausgerichtet sind) und du kannst einiges eintragen, bevor du hochlädst (achte nur drauf, dass du nicht Dinge aus bspw. Bayern und Schleswig Holstein gleichzeitig hochlädst).

Weiter viel Spaß in Wald und Feld
eerib (2025-12-14 18:34:44+00:00): Hello Shinsplints,

Note that this trail is signed at both ends as "Newt Trail", hence why the primary name is now Newt Trail.

https://imgur.com/a/ESongBN
Fraxi (2025-12-14 18:21:48+00:00): И за тези двата от https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175926535 допълних данни
Dimitar155 (2025-12-14 19:14:06+00:00): При тях таговете са коректни, не е необходима промяна.
divulmappeur (2025-12-30 23:31:05+00:00): Why did you remove living zones on M24 road in the center of Aspremont ? There is a B52 sign indicating a living street.
Could you please revert your changes so they match mine?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155698612
Snusmumriken (2025-12-31 06:25:04+00:00): There was no living street sign there when I drove trough Aspremont
NicholasNCE (2026-02-12 11:08:51+00:00): Le gestionnaire d'infrastructure de la ligne de Luchon est depuis sa réouverture en 2025 la région Occitanie, et non SNCF Réseau, bien que cette dernière assure par délégation une partie des prestations de gestion de la ligne: https://www.sncf-reseau.com/medias-publics/2025-12/drr2026m-annexe-8-2-drrro_occitanie_1.pdf
AurélienQ (2026-02-13 12:12:04+00:00): Merci pour ta juste remarque, c'est corrigé
NicholasNCE (2026-02-14 09:00:06+00:00): Merci beaucoup :)
werbuli (2025-12-20 18:03:44+00:00): Nochmal ich:  kann es sein, dass du auch hier nicht gesehen hast, das die public_transport=platform bereits neben deinen neuen Taggig vorhanden war ?  Jetzt haben wir drei Dubletten.
Bitte nicht die Falschen löschen, weil die in die ÖPNV-Busrouten-Relationen eingebunden sind!
TornadoFang (2025-12-20 19:33:03+00:00): Es besteht durchaus die Möglichkeit, dass dies zutrifft. Ich kann mich allerdings nicht daran erinnern. Ich bemühe mich stets, das zu vermeiden.
A67-A67 (2025-12-23 16:12:10+00:00): SPAR city en SPAR express hebben een eigen brand-tag. Deze heb ik hersteld.
MaartenTheMapper (2025-12-23 17:31:14+00:00): Je hebt helemaal gelijk. Blijkbaar staat er een foute wikidata-tag in de NSI, want juist deze combinatie geeft een foutmelding in iD.
A67-A67 (2025-12-23 18:12:26+00:00): Er staan inderdaad veel fouten in de NSI. De meldingen in de iD-editor zijn ook geen foutmeldingen, maar suggesties. Dat kunnen ook verkeerde suggesties zijn.
A67-A67 (2026-01-17 22:36:44+00:00): Jumbo City en Intertoys XL waren ook foutief gewijzigd naar Jumbo en Intertoys. Deze heb ik ook teruggedraaid.
Shorticus (2025-12-16 08:39:10+00:00): Some of the trees are no longer there: the perils of mapping from out of date imagery
gurglypipe (2025-12-16 09:21:51+00:00): Better that stuff is mapped from out of date imagery than not mapped at all. :)

Thanks for removing them (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175994064), although in future it might be better to change them to use the removed:* lifecycle prefix (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix#Stages_of_decay), or changing the tagging to tree stump (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dtree_stump), to avoid someone accidentally re-adding them from outdated aerial imagery in future. Ta :)
Shorticus (2025-12-16 10:16:11+00:00): form:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_We_Map

"When in doubt, also consider the 'on the ground rule': map the world as it can be observed by someone physically there."

I once mapped a new road system only to hve someone use the out of date imagery to remove it. Be very cautious when mapping on imagery alone.
gurglypipe (2025-12-16 10:23:26+00:00): I am well aware of those guidelines thank you.
Pr166 (2025-12-16 10:08:40+00:00): Hoi, bij beiden kruisingen Grote Wiel / IJsvogel staat een bord "doodlopend weg" met als onderbord "Uitgezonderd (brom)fietsen. Het voor autoverkeer is daarmee door de wegbeheerder bedoeld als begaanbaar  voor (brom)fietsen. Het pad is echter ook een voetpad en ongeveer 90 cm breed.
eggie (2025-12-16 10:23:22+00:00): Oke.. Wanneer er geen bord fietspad staat dan kun je beter highway=path taggen.
In dit geval dan met bicycle moped mofa en foot=yes.
Mapse..
eggie
Pr166 (2025-12-16 10:34:51+00:00): Dank!
mweper (2025-12-14 21:22:03+00:00): Hello Mueschel. 

Why did you change the label from “related_law:alt_name” to just “related_law”?

This could lead to confusion, as it suggests that the related law refers to the street in general and not specifically to the alternative name given to it.

In other words, “related_law:alt_name” is more specific because it refers only to the “alt_name” and not to all the characteristics of the road.
mueschel (2025-12-15 09:00:53+00:00): I read the tag as the alternative name of the related law, which doesn't make sense. 
Wouldn't the law related to the name not be better tagged as 
alt_name:related_law , similar to e.g. alt_name:wikipedia ?
mweper (2025-12-15 12:08:13+00:00): "alt_name:related_law": That sounds fine to me. I didn't know that the order of this label affected the meaning of the labeling.
blacx (2025-12-14 19:55:51+00:00): es una via de servei de la gasolinera, si el problema es que t'hi fa passar per anar d'academia a manuel de palacio es pot posar l'acces per a costumers unicament
GeoMarcH (2025-12-15 09:30:39+00:00): S’hauria de restringir l’accés exclusivament als clients, ja que no es tracta d’una via pública. En qualsevol cas, jo seria partidari únicament d’indicar que es tracta d’una gasolinera, atès que posa que es una via d'accès per sobre  l'activitat genera soroll i afecta la cartografia i el parcel·lari, tenint en compte que és una finca privada.
blacx (2025-12-15 09:37:14+00:00): Que sigui privat o no es irrellevant, una via de servei és una via que s'ha de mapejar igualment simplement es marca com a privat. En aquest cas es access=costumers, que ja l'he posat.
NeisBot (2025-12-14 18:09:26+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 52 potential crossings.

Problematic elements (top 3 by category):
https://osm.org/way/239094465 v10 | 33 crossings
https://osm.org/way/239925013 v5 | 19 crossings

Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/2476941525 v4

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=175928966
NeisRevert (2025-12-16 16:30:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/176013856
where the comment is: "Revert of unintended geometry change"
Dillen GJ (2025-12-14 18:08:38+00:00): Is er een goed reden om vakantiepark Landal Esonstad landuse=residential te geven ?
eggie (2025-12-14 21:35:46+00:00): ..hoi..
..landuse=residential kan volgens mij wel als het permanent bewoond wordt.
leisure=resort zie ik ook wel op die parken.
Anders meer een vraagje voor het forum.

Mvg..
eggie
Dillen GJ (2025-12-15 09:32:50+00:00): Hoi Eggie !
Daarom wilde ik eerst reactie van de mapper want wellicht heeft hij lokale info. Reden van de vraag is deze brochure: https://api.vakantiemakelaar.nl/brochure/park/1275.pdf waarin gesteld wordt: “Bij Landal Esonstad is verhuur van de accommodatie mogelijk, maar niet verplicht.
Als vorige mapper info heeft dat alle vakantiehuizen verkocht zijn aan eigenaren/partijen die niet verhuren aan Landal, dan buiten twijfel is landuse=residential helemaal correct wat dan wel raar is, is waarom Landal Esonstad website vakantie verhuur bestaat: https://www.landal.nl/parken/esonstad
Wil het wel aan forum voorleggen hoor maar zullen n.a.v. voorgelegde info het zelfde zeggen toch ?
eggie (2025-12-15 09:36:38+00:00): Residential is in ieder geval niet verkeerd..
Dillen GJ (2025-12-15 09:46:10+00:00): Daarom ook laten staan en vraag uitgezet met als extra info nu:
“ Open Dag Landal Esonstad - vrijdag 19 december
Naast Nationaal Park Lauwersmeer in het Friese Anjum ligt Landal Esonstad, een recreatiepark bestaande uit meer dan 144 recreatiewoningen in Oudfriese stijl. Hier word je omringd door een waterrijk landschap met in het noorden de Waddenzee en in het binnenland de vele meren. ” Voor mij te ver weg maar misschien zijn er lokale mappers die hierdoor definitieve kunnen bemachtigen ?
Dillen GJ (2025-12-15 09:47:22+00:00): Definitieve = definitieve info
Dillen GJ (2025-12-15 09:50:59+00:00): Ik zet de vraag op het forum, kijken wat daar de reactie gaat worden.
Frans S (2026-01-30 12:08:56+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
A remark.
When you map a road that continues over the edge of your task, please draw it a bit over the edge. Now you stopped before the edge. Another mapper, working on the adjacent task will not see it. when you draw it a bit over the edge, he can continue.
Best regards
eggie (2025-12-14 19:24:23+00:00): Dag Johnny. Je vraagt feedback.
Meestal gebruiken we highway=path in het buitengebied en niet footway.

Geef svp aan wat je doet.
Lokale bekendheid zegt niets.

Mvg
eggie
marc__marc (2026-01-05 08:49:30+00:00): Bonjour,
pourrais-tu renseigné un meilleur commentaire de changement que 45 ?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bons_commentaires_de_groupe_de_modifications
Merci et bonne journée
DF45 (2026-01-05 17:01:03+00:00): Bonjour,
Tu as raison.
Je vais m'astreindre à être plus précis.
Une nouvelle résolution pour 2026.
Très bonne année 2026.
Cordialement, DF45
stosh77 (2025-12-16 10:39:15+00:00): Revised.
eggie (2025-12-14 21:07:41+00:00): Dag John,

Svp niet name= gebruiken om iets te beschrijven. Dus geen name=carport.
Ik heb de naam verwijderden tevcens het adres.

Svp niet naar dakranden kijken en dan gebouwen opnieuw gaan uitlijnen. Daar staan de gebouwen niet.
MVG
eggie
Frans S (2025-12-26 15:38:21+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
Issues found on your mappings

A: Inaccurate mapping. 

B: Overlapping buildings.
C: Collected adjacent buildings and mapped it as 1 building.
D: Connecting nodes to other features.
E: Buildings not squared or rounded.



Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175929817
infeeeee (2025-12-15 10:41:31+00:00): Szia!

Ezt a régi fajta parkoló címkézést már nem használjuk. Helyette ezt így kell címkézni:

parking:both=no
parking:both:restriction=no_stopping

Bővebben a wikiben angolul: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Street_parking

Lényeg magyarul: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hungary/Jelölési_példák/Parkolás

További jó térképezést!
jm428 (2025-12-15 00:37:15+00:00): Hi, thanks for contributing to OSM. UMass Amherst is already mapped, so I deleted the node that you added. Though I updated the existing umass relation with the phone number and social media accounts that you added.

Here is the UMass relation: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9361144

Here is a page in the wiki that explains why I removed what you added: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
edqxzv9b (2025-12-18 04:01:11+00:00): Thank you, that is very helpful. Please accept my apologies- I did not read the rules before contributing.
jm428 (2025-12-18 19:41:20+00:00): No worries, we all learn as we go!
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2025-12-16 17:57:32+00:00): Merhaba. Elinize sağlık. Değişikliğinize review_requested=yes koyduğunuz için yorum yazıyorum. 

OpenStreetMap'te operator=Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı etiketi içeren okulların etiketlerini tek seferde "bu şekilde" değiştirmek bana kalırsa pek doğru değil. "Bu şekilde değiştirmek" diyorum çünkü okulları tek tek incelemediğinizi varsayıyorum. (source=survey etiketinin de doğru olmadığını sanıyorum, bu kadar çok okulu yerinde gördüyseniz bilemem tabii :) )
Bkz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/What%27s_the_problem_with_mechanical_edits

Değişikliğinizin içinde "... İlköğretim Okulu" adını taşıyan okullar gördüm. Türkiye'de bildiğim kadarıyla artık "ilköğretim okulu" yok. 4+4+4 sistemi ile ilkokullar ve ortaokullar ayrıldı. Dolayısıyla etiketlerini değiştirdiğiniz ilköğretim okullarının en azından adının değiştiği kesin. Etiketlerini değiştirdiğiniz, adları ilkokul; ortaokul olan okulların da halen o noktalarda aynı adlarla bulundukları ise kesin değil. Sizin değişikliğinizde de var mı bilmiyorum ama 2023 depreminden sonra binaları incelenip, depreme dayanıksız olduğu gerekçesiyle geçici olarak başka yerde faaliyet gösteren okullar da var.

Bu tip düzenlemelerde, değişiklik yapmadan önce değiştirilen nesneleri tek tek incelemek gerekli. Kesin bilgi içermeyen bu tip toplu değişiklikler için Maproulette görevi oluşturulması daha uygun diye düşünüyorum. OSM Türkiye topluluğunun örnek Maproulette görevleri için bkz: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/osm-tr-topluluk-projeleri-maproulette/138267

Ayrıca bkz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct

operator:type=public etiketlerini operator:type=government diye çevirmenizin nedenini anlayamadım. Viki'deki tanımlar net değil. Bu değişikliğin gerekçesini de açıklarsanız memnun olurum.

Bir diğer konu ise NSI. Düzenlediğiniz okulları iD editörde görüntüleyenler muhtemelen iD'nin önerisi ile etiketleri eski haline getireceklerdir. Böyle bir değişikliğe niyetiniz varsa NSI'deki okul presetlerinin de değiştirilmesi teklif edilmeliydi diye düşünüyorum. https://nsi.guide/index.html?t=*&k=amenity&v=school&cc=tr#milliegitimbakanligi-44c4b9 

OSM Türkiye topluluğu: 
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/tr/118

https://t.me/osm_tr
user_23196460 (2025-12-17 06:13:39+00:00): Merhaba.
source=survey etiketi tam anlamını yansıtmamış olabilir, ben eklerken operatör hakkındaki ismi "araştırdığımı" düşünerek eklemiştim. Wiki sayfasına şimdi baktım ama galiba etiketi çok yanlış yorumlamışım.

Yıkılmış/adı değişmiş/yeri değişmiş okullar 4252 okulda illa ki var olacaktır ancak burada sadece operator:wikidata değeri açık bir şekilde Millî Eğitim Bakanlığına işaret eden yerlerde sadece operatörün kendisi (MEB) ile ilgili değişiklikler yaptım. Açıkçası bir ilköğretim okulunun Milli E.B. yerine Millî E.B. tarafından işletilmesi neden istenmeyen bir şey anlamadım.

Bu değişikliği NSI'de MEB'e bağlı okulların operatörü ile ilgili kısmı düzenledikten sonra yaptım. Değişikliği burada görebilirsiniz: https://github.com/osmlab/name-suggestion-index/blob/main/data/operators/amenity/school.json#L31492-L31505 Ancak bu değişikliklerin NSI web sitesinde (ve iD editöründe) güncellenmesi biraz zaman alacak sanırım.

NSI'in geliştiricilerine MEB ile ilgili veriyi güncellemek için bir istek gönderdiğimde sadece MEB'in hatalı ismini düzeltmiştim. Ama onlar NSI'deki bir bakanlık tarafından işletilen bütün okulların operator:type=government olduğunu söylediler ve fikrimi sordular. Kısa bir tartışma sonucunda government olmasının daha mantıklı olduğuna karar verdik. Dikkat ederseniz burada her ne kadar "public" olan devlet okullarından bahsetsek de okulların operatörü MEB ve "operatörün tipi" doğal olarak government. Sonuçta MEB bir dernek değil, bakanlık.
Udarian (2025-12-14 18:53:30+00:00): the wikipedia on this one seems to be incorrect
GerdP (2026-01-20 18:05:27+00:00): Moin aus Wildeshausen!
Bitte keine Straßennamen erfinden. Die Zufahrten haben keine eigenen Namen. Ich habe das für diese beiden Wege wieder gelöscht.
Jan Glander (2026-01-20 19:32:25+00:00): Es handelt sich lediglich um zwei Zufahrten. Die Karte ist Grundlage für die Navigation, über die mehrere Paketdienste und einige Besucher unsere Häuser nicht finden können. Die Bezeichnung der Zufahrten lösen dieses Problem.
GerdP (2026-01-20 19:40:40+00:00): Ich war heute dort, die Adresse ist vor Ort mit Eggerskamp 1 angegeben und in OSM von Dir so eingetragen. Den entsprechenden Hinweis von Dir kannst Du bitte schließen. Die Adresse ist aber anscheinend im Katasteramt noch immer Rittrumer Kirchweg 26, das ist dann wohl falsch und ich werde das melden. Kannst Du aber gerne auch selbst machen.
Siehe auch https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/adressenabgleich-alkis-nds-rlp-nrw/139688
GerdP (2026-01-20 19:41:16+00:00): Deine Notiz findest Du hier:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5091484
Kees 59 (2025-12-18 11:25:01+00:00): Haltes Julianalaan hebben een telefoonnummer? Ik vermoed dat dat old_name moet zijn?
A67-A67 (2025-12-18 12:26:26+00:00): Bedankt. Ik heb het aangepast.
NeisBot (2025-12-15 06:32:31+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 11 potential crossings.

Problematic elements (top 3 by category):
https://osm.org/way/700286589 v2 | 6 crossings
https://osm.org/way/700286588 v3 | 5 crossings

Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/6576312898 v3

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=175931079
pitscheplatsch (2025-12-16 16:45:57+00:00): Should be fixed by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175951997