piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Molker (2025-12-20 21:47:50+00:00): For this relation RAB 144 Gleiwitz-Krakau were ca. 30 km in construction, mainly cutting trees, and some movement of the top soil. 

I removed the 29 as well.
MassCartog (2025-12-21 00:23:49+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM could you describe why you removed this path? I see parts may be privately owned. But it still seems to exist on the ground. Thanks
Crohns (2025-12-21 23:59:37+00:00): Thanks, been enjoying the platform thus far. Apologies for not correctly using some of the tags, I’m still getting the hang of this. I removed the foot path because it’s actually a levee maintenance road and didn’t want to cause confusion. I will not delete the foot path however I do believe it should be changed to more accurately represent what is there. Thanks!
MassCartog (2025-12-22 14:33:14+00:00): Thank for the reply! yah Its not really made clear to new users, but OSM uses the tagging system rather then removing data. So if something exist on the ground even if its private/informal/illegal/unauthorized it should still remain in the OSM database. OSM is about ground truth.

Here is more information if you are interested:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won't_delete_roads_on_private_property

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F
Sammyhawkrad (2025-12-22 12:22:27+00:00): Hi IDGU, welcome to OSM. Note that streets do not need address tags (addr:city, addr:street, addr:*). Adding just the name, if known, is enough.
AndyB_66 (2025-12-20 19:38:22+00:00): Wandalizm nie będzie tolerowany.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176194081
kadiwa (2025-12-20 18:25:43+00:00): Anmerkung: Es gibt bestimmt irgendein korrektes Taggingschema, um Haltestellen als Flächen oder als Linien zu kartieren, aber ich wüsste nicht wie. Das, was hier eingetragen war, ergab auf jeden Fall keinen Sinn.
AndyB_66 (2025-12-20 19:36:50+00:00): Wandalizm nie będzie tolerowany.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176194028
AndyB_66 (2025-12-20 19:36:23+00:00): Wandalizm nie będzie tolerowany.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176194019
Fizzie-DWG (2025-12-20 23:37:17+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19193
Rainero-repair (2026-04-01 07:09:34+00:00): Revert in changeset/180704365
wegen nicht zulässiger Quelle (Bayernatlas).
eggie (2025-12-20 19:30:10+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  De tag voor die steigers is man_made=pier.
Wanneer je een breder effect wilt hebben kun je ze aks vlak intekenen met area=yes.
Nu zie je gewoon water, want je hebt nu soort muren ingetekend. (retaining_wall)
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-12-20 19:37:29+00:00): Ik heb man_made pier teruggezet als vlak met area=yes en retaining_wall verwijderd.
Evt. kun je die apart toevoegen.

MVG
eggie
AndyB_66 (2025-12-20 19:24:25+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
BCNorwich (2025-12-22 07:36:37+00:00): Removed
BCNorwich (2025-12-22 07:36:14+00:00): Fiction crossing removed
eggie (2025-12-20 19:44:35+00:00): Merged info with addressnode. Please select the present addressnode
Greetz,
eggie
BCNorwich (2025-12-22 07:31:46+00:00): Duplicated highway removed
BCNorwich (2025-12-22 07:39:57+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Please don't add fiction to OSM because OSM is a live worldwide database from which hundreds of maps are compiled. You may one day have to rely on one of those maps.

Regards Bernard.
Dodko (2025-12-21 15:35:39+00:00): Otváracie hodiny musia byť v angličtine, inak to aplikácie nepoznajú pomôcka je https://projets.pavie.info/yohours/
Fizzie-DWG (2025-12-21 00:27:05+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19196
Fizzie-DWG (2026-01-18 05:09:31+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177359888
StC (2025-12-22 22:52:22+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changeset a brisé le continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre qui passe par là. Est-ce que cela correspond vraiment au terrain, et les chemins ne peuvent plus être utilisés pour traverser la route ?
didier2020 (2025-12-23 16:20:47+00:00): Bonjour,
il y a une discontinuité de la relation
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12852048#map=16/48.62135/2.81027

cela se voit sur reperage photo
https://panoramax.openstreetmap.fr/?s=fp;s2;p81dda333-595e-4c6c-9a72-6c4f8471bc9a;c272.00/0.00/30;m17.81/48.623314/2.806959;bs

if audrait y aller en vélo ou a pied pour voir s'il y a des indications sur les nouveaux chemins agricoles créé
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/107738740
et
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1460128665
pyrog (2025-12-23 21:34:46+00:00): Bonsoir,

La modification du GR 1 suite au contournement de Guignes est documentée.
Je n'ai pas l'impression que le balisage a été refait.

Cf. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176327197

Cordialement,
Yves — Groupe OSM Plein Air
pyrog (2025-12-23 21:37:13+00:00): Mise à jour visible sur WMT : 
https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=386891&type=relation&map=14.0/48.6288/2.8227
A67-A67 (2025-12-20 22:35:12+00:00): In deze wijziging lijken de fietsstroken rond de rotonde te zijn ingetekend als vrijliggende fietspaden. Is er een fysieke scheiding aangebracht? Dat lijkt namelijk niet zo op recente satellietfoto's
Hetisbakkerijdepinknietdegier (2025-12-21 10:01:32+00:00): Er is inderdaad geen fysieke scheiding. Mag je de fietspaden dan niet los mappen? Mogen de voetpaden wel?
A67-A67 (2025-12-21 11:20:21+00:00): Fietsstroken (gescheiden met verf) en stoepen (gescheiden met stoeprand) worden getagd als eigenschap van de weg met tags als cycleway=lane en sidewalk=both.

Fietspaden en voetpaden (beide wel fysiek gescheiden) worden als aparte ways getagd.
A67-A67 (2025-12-21 11:22:36+00:00): Ik zie dat de fietsstroken op de rotonde bijvoorbeeld als in kaart waren gebracht: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1202797723
Hetisbakkerijdepinknietdegier (2025-12-21 12:09:31+00:00): Oke, ik heb het weer weggehaald
A67-A67 (2025-12-21 20:29:52+00:00): Bedankt voor het oplossen!
watmildon (2026-03-29 05:29:14+00:00): Really nice work!!
Bienson (2025-12-21 03:27:10+00:00): Hallo,

Bitte keine random Werte für social_facility:for erfinden.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:social%20facility:for?uselang=de

phone-Tag bitte im internationalen Format eintragen (führendes +49 anstatt 0)
joost schouppe (2026-01-06 10:26:16+00:00): Merci pour l'ajout.
As the sports centre consists of much more than the building, I drew a new outline that consists of the entire site and put the info about the club there. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176895899
eggie (2025-12-21 21:08:36+00:00): Dag Kouldream. Dat gaat niet helpen. 
Wanneer hier een slingerhekje staat geef dan op het slingerhekje de eigenschappen aan en/of in ieder geval de breedte.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dcycle_barrier
maxwidth:physical=*
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-12-21 21:17:57+00:00): Aangepast met dubbel slingerhekje en cargo_bike=no
De doorgangsbreedte ken ik niet.
Gr eggie
Kouldream (2025-12-23 19:16:12+00:00): Dag Eggie,

dank voor je reactie. kwam er met mijn quatrovello met een breedte van 76 cm niet doorheen. 

kreeg zelf niet gevonden waar ik het moest aanpassen. 

Richard
eggie (2025-12-23 19:28:02+00:00): Hoi.. Er bestaan voor garmin een speciale OSM kaart voor velomobielen.
Je zou het het de maker PeeWee32 even kunnen vragen. Die vind je wel op het forum. Zie draadje Nieuwjaarsborrel.
AndyB_66 (2025-12-24 21:18:16+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
rempshaener (2025-12-20 22:55:08+00:00): Hallo,

maintenance ist abweichend belegt, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Amaintenance
Das Datum sehe ich auch nicht zwingend als etwas, was in OSM gut aufgehoben ist.
Viele Grüße
fkrautscheid (2025-12-21 00:11:11+00:00): Hallo,

wir machen die Hydranten einmal im Jahr winterfest. Dazu haben wir die in mehrere "Touren" aufgeteilt.
Was wäre ein gutes Tag dies zu dokumentieren?

Des Weiteren möchte ich auch noch Schieber für Wasserleitungen dokumentieren. Die machen wir in einem nämlich auch winterfest. Wie dokumentiert man Schieber am besten? Die liegen in der Regel in unmittelbarer zu den Hydranten.

Viele Grüße
rempshaener (2025-12-21 11:13:23+00:00): Hallo,

das mit der "Tour" hatte ich schon vermutet. Die Tour als solche einzutragen geht leider ein wenig über das hinaus, was in OSM üblich ist. Mir fehlt da spontan auch die Idee, wie man das sonst abbilden könnte.
Vielleicht hilft schon einmal, check_date aufzunehmen? Dann fehlt aber immer noch die "Zuständigkeit".

Was die Schieber angeht: Dafür gibt es das Schema https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:pipeline%3Dvalve, das sollte machbar sein.

Viele Grüße
fkrautscheid (2025-12-21 11:42:47+00:00): Okay super, verstehe. 
Bezüglich der Tour, das wäre aber wichtig, weil ich ein overlay gebaut habe, dass dann automatisch auf der Karte nur die Hydranten anzeigt, die zu der Tour gehören, die man gehen möchte. Kann ich dafür einfach note oder description verwenden? Was von beiden wäre zu bevorzugen? Oder ist das gehüpft wie gesprungen?
fkrautscheid (2025-12-21 11:43:18+00:00): PS: Der Change Satz hier kann gerne zurück gerollt werden.
rempshaener (2025-12-21 22:21:20+00:00): Hallo,
ich fürchte, so etwas lässt nicht richtig gut abbilden.
Wenn schon, dann eher description.
Bei note soll der/die nächste Mapper auf etwas hingewiesen werden; das ist hier eigentlich nicht der Fall. Dann lass es doch einfach bei description, wird schon klappen.
Viele Grüße
Senihtu (2025-12-21 06:47:07+00:00): Guten Morgen!
Mit diesem Changeset hast Du way 28466454 (Eutergrundweg) mit access=private getaggt.
Der Weg ist Teil einer Buslinienrelation - und Busse fahren eher nicht über Privatstraßen.
Du wirst die Gegend besser kennen als ich. Hat der Bus seinen Weg geändert?
Grüße
Senihtu
Interteutones (2025-12-21 17:43:24+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. War ein versehen meinerseits. Habe es korrigiert.
Grüße
I
Rainero-repair (2026-04-01 06:39:15+00:00): Revert in changeset/180703418
wegen nicht zulässiger Quelle (Bayernatlas).
john mcjohnathon (2025-12-20 21:44:45+00:00): https://imgur.com/a/aicppKH
source
ika-chan! (2025-12-22 03:44:27+00:00): Hello, Road relations in Greece can only contain the mainline of the route as members, not facilities such as toll buildings.

Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:route for more details.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-12-21 00:02:29+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19194
Fizzie-DWG (2026-01-18 04:01:49+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised editing from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177359211
Dimitar155 (2025-12-21 18:27:09+00:00): Здравей! wikidata тага се поставя на точно един OSM елемент. Поради тази причина са създадени релации за всяка улица и върху съответната релация има wikidata таг. Поставянето на този таг е излишно за самите пътища. Поради тази причина ги премахнах.
Поздрави,
Митко

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176229763
NeisBot (2025-12-27 15:51:17+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13391601802 v1

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Painting and decorating company in East Sussex and West Sussex"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description
NeisBot (2026-01-01 17:30:44+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/176712473
(Deleted leftovers after several edits)
VLD0251 (2025-12-24 09:33:40+00:00): Hello, thank you for your contributions. however, in Ethiopia, arabic should not be used for the primary name tag. according to OSM rules, the name field must contain the name in the local language (e.g., Amharic, Oromo). please use the tag name:ar for Arabic names in the future and do not modify the primary name. 
Best regards.
Ahmed500000 (2025-12-24 12:21:32+00:00): Oh, really? what about the English names? Is it a local language too? Arabic language is well-known there and many places names have origins from Arabic language, so, I think it is useful to use the Arabic names for these maps.
VLD0251 (2025-12-24 15:04:36+00:00): The fundamental rule of OpenStreetMap (OSM) is to always use the local language in the name tag, based on what is written on official signs (often Amharic or Oromo).
English is only used if it is present on those same signs.
the correct convention is:
name: local name (and English if on signs)
name:en: English version
name:ar: Arabic version
this ensures data consistency and compliance with OSM naming conventions
Ahmed500000 (2025-12-24 21:38:38+00:00): Arabic is well-known there, so, it represents a local language, therefore, this do not violates OSM rules. The main point of mapping - generally speaking - is to guide people by any means ( using multiple names for the same places if it is useful ).
Yovân El-Mekh (2025-12-24 23:31:48+00:00): in ethiopia, arabic is neither a local language, nor a national or official one. the dominant languages are amharic, oromo, somali, and tigrinya. if we follow your logic, would it be acceptable for me to add ethiopian names (in amharic) to the primary name tag in egypt or other arab league countries? the answer is obviously no, because amharic is not the language spoken on the ground in egypt. the same applies to arabic in ethiopia: according to the osm "on-the-ground" rule, it must be placed in the name:ar tag and not in the main name tag. the latter is strictly reserved for the language used locally by residents and on road signs.
Ahmed500000 (2025-12-25 13:39:33+00:00): You have gone so far in an endeavor to prove the your biased opinions against Arabic language. Take a close look at a neighboring country which is Eritrea, it was a part of Ethiopia, has very close characteristics to Ethiopia and most importantly, has multiple names for the same locations. Your comparison does not stand because Arabic language is well-known and familiar in Ethiopia. If you want to compare better, you should mention  the Nubian and Coptic languages in Egypt instead of Arabic, although they are not widely used right now, but, they still represent local languages. Do you know that the Coptic calendar is still in use in Egypt?
VLD0251 (2025-12-25 15:17:55+00:00): Ethiopia recognizes five official federal working languages: Afar, Amharic, Oromo, Somali, and Tigrinya, while Arabic is not a federal working language. According to OpenStreetMap standards, the name tag is reserved for the local language used on road signs and by residents, which is typically Amharic or other regional official languages ​​in Ethiopia. Arabic names should be placed in the name:ar tag. Learn more about multilingual mapping on the OpenStreetMap Wiki.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multilingual_names#Ethiopia
If you do not revert your changes and continue to ignore naming conventions, I will report you to the OpenStreetMap Data Working Group (DWG)
Ahmed500000 (2025-12-25 22:03:07+00:00): OSM is not an official map service, so, your approach is nearly useless. Thanks for the link, really useful one as it equipped my claim that Arabic is a local language. I think you missed to read the following sentence from the wiki page you linked to " Transliteration from Amharic to English is difficult ", this fact makes sure that Arabic is much better than English in indicating places names in Ethiopia as both Arabic and Amharic are Semitic languages and Amharic is affected by Arabic. There is no need to reach the DWG which I think they are working on more important issues.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-12-22 07:01:53+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19198
nevw (2025-12-21 10:12:35+00:00): I think the Kingaroy Heights Park and Environmental Area you have drawn looks very good.
LordGarySugar (2025-12-21 20:13:05+00:00): Hi, thanks for helping to improve building coverage in OSM! As you're making use of rapid's suggested buildings, I wanted to let you know that they are not suitable for import in all situations, for example where there are semidetached or terraced houses. It would be preferable to draw these types of houses manually, so that each property can have one building polygon instead of being merged with adjoining houses. For example, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1460161479 is a terrace of four houses, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1460161480 is two semidetached houses and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1460096302 looks like two detached houses. Overall, everything else looks good as this is an area of mainly detached houses. If you have any questions about this, feel free to ask and happy mapping! :)
eggie (2025-12-21 20:19:53+00:00): Hoi Je vraagt feedback.. Wanneer je gras op bos legt zie je het door elkaar renderen. Ik heb het bos van het gras gehaald.

Je ziet nu aan het begin van de 'laan' nog bos op gras.
CTRL-F5 voor het effect en dan zal het wel weer verdwijnen.
Tip: Dus in het kort .. geen landuse op elkaar leggen
Groet,
eggie
uprkos (2025-12-22 22:47:10+00:00): Opis zmian nic nie mówi.
Nazwa jest błędna - akcent nad 'a' powinien być w drugą stronę.
SpinOff (2025-12-21 14:47:52+00:00): Hej. Musisz dokładniej opisywać swoje zestawy zmian. Podrzucam artykuł na wiki, który opisuje dlaczego i jak należy to robić: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
uprkos (2025-12-22 22:43:19+00:00): Po co zmieniasz masowo 'im.' na 'imienia'? Niepotrzebnie wydłuża to nazwy i wygląda dziwnie. Czy możesz zacząć odpisywać na komentarze? Twoje edycje wzbudzają wątpliwości.
Aight 2009 (2025-12-23 10:54:11+00:00): dlatego, że inny użytkownik zwrócił uwagę że zgodnie z wytycznymi OSM winno rozwijać się skróty
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-12-21 02:15:14+00:00): Why did you downgrade these secondary roads to tertiary? Based on the way they're built, they appear to be minor arterial roads, rather than collector/distributor roads. (Of course, they don't connect to anything right now other than other roads, and they also have no traffic right now.) (Also, the secondary portion of Alta Drive is now no longer connected to any secondary roads or higher, leaving a stub/spur between Park Drift Trail and Sky Vista Drive.)
Joseph R P (2025-12-21 14:44:10+00:00): These roads, in their current state, don't serve any major development or destinations or provide any service to through traffic, and currently have very low traffic counts since this area is quite underdeveloped in its current state. I wouldn't classify most roads  in this area any higher than unclassified or tertiary, since it will likely be a couple more years until this area is built up enough to warrant such high classification for these roads.
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-12-21 17:31:00+00:00): Oh, alright then. I guess I'll just have to wait then.
Kees 59 (2026-04-26 13:40:10+00:00): Ways: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1460165779 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1460165780 did something went wrong with copying here?
felipeeugenio (2025-12-21 11:47:07+00:00): Hola. Buenos días. Una cosa es la estructura que está dentro de un recinto, y otra cosa es el recinto mismo. Dejé la Iglesia como estaba y dibujé la estructura por separado. 

Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176200968
nevw (2025-12-21 21:59:34+00:00): Hi, it looks like you have deleted part of Liana Lounge https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9448671
As seen on https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=176201016
It looks like what's left needs its shape fixed too. I am remote from the area so you may be better suited to fixing it.
nevw (2025-12-21 22:00:25+00:00): As seen on osmi https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=153.02208&lat=-27.47595&zoom=18
eggie (2025-12-21 11:58:31+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Lyon-St-Clair (2025-12-21 10:10:16+00:00): merci pour les retouches, n'étant pas sur place et vu le côté aléatoire de l'info voyageurs TAM/LiO par moment c'est pas évident.
Natfoot (2026-03-16 02:46:20+00:00): according to the wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=cycleway
cycleway is still appropriate. this is also more important as this is part of USBRS 10
VictorIE (2025-12-26 05:13:35+00:00): I had been doing this one-by-one for years.

Your next task, should you wish to accept it: Split all the groups of tennis courts mapped as a single tennis court! :)
gogorm (2025-12-28 14:30:49+00:00): I'll pass, but in case you aren't already aware, someone in the states did a write-up about exactly that issue: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/bmaczero/diary/407962
VictorIE (2026-01-07 07:24:35+00:00): Found one! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/338477458 and fixed it. :)

That said, Caledon House stretches the idea of "single dwelling residence".
gogorm (2026-01-07 23:46:15+00:00): Yeah, I probably missed a few, my rule was to move on if I was still unsure after a few seconds.
bxl-forever (2025-12-21 09:55:14+00:00): Hello, and welcome to OSM.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:railway:etcs should not be used on relations.

Relations are special objects used to group various parts of a railway line.  Relations do not contain railway-specific data (like gauge, signalling-type or ECTS).

If you want to add the ECTS data to tracks, fine, but please:

1) Coordinate with people already doing this effort.  Users like https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/JJJWegdam or https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Sikal are already importing/updating this data.  Make sure you all use the same tagging conventions.

2) Add details on the railway tracks themselves.

Thanks in advance.
MaliMrav (2025-12-23 09:46:16+00:00): Zdravo sm4rk0,

Da li možemo da uskladimo nazive? Da li u nazivu treba da stoji "Amaterski" ili ne treba?

Pozdrav,
MaliMrav
MaliMrav (2025-12-23 09:46:47+00:00): Mislim na ovaj nod:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5806773153
sm4rk0 (2025-12-23 09:51:42+00:00): Назив је био на енглеском, па сам само превео на српски, али после сам видео званични назив на српском и грешком променио све осим једног. Сад ћу исправити. Хвала!
TheNightRider (2025-12-21 01:46:43+00:00): Oops, in the changeset comments I meant to say "highway number (41>49)" because it's on Highway 49, though very close to Highway 41.
Aleksandar Matejevic (2025-12-23 10:04:52+00:00): You have changed the admin_level value, and now you have an overlap with Fuzhou City. Either remove Pingtan from Fuzhou City or lower the admin_level value back to original one.
蕉饼电脑 (2025-12-23 20:23:07+00:00): Pingtan is de facto not administrated by Fuzhou (despite being de jure a part of Fuzhou). According to the rules of OpenStreetMap, Pingtan should be excluded from Fuzhou.
However, the rest of the OSMChina community has determined that Pingtan should not be removed from the boundaries of Fuzhou without a valid reason.
Aleksandar Matejevic (2025-12-24 07:16:00+00:00): There is a Pingtan boundary present at admin_level=6 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3263974. This one is de-jure boundary. If you wanted this admin_level=5 to be de-facto I think boundary=administrative is not a proper tag. You should, maybe, use boundary=special_economic_zone if there are some different laws applied for this area. Current tagging is making overlap on admin_level=5 administrative boundary type which is the worst solution applied.