piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
LockOnGuy (2024-06-09 21:16:32+00:00): Dear desertivy, Please use good changeset comment so mappers can understand and know what you edit, as putting only the street name in the changeset comment does not explain your edit and mappers would spent more time examining the changeset.      
Also can you please share the source of the alt_name you added here? would be appreciated it.        
Regards.
desertivy (2024-06-10 10:16:08+00:00): refer to discussion:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152435066
emersonveenstra (2024-06-13 13:25:07+00:00): Hi there,

You created https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1290544706 with no tags, could you please go back and tag it? Thanks!
Matthew_Hanson (2024-06-13 13:57:13+00:00): I’m sorry I just seemed to miss it before I committed the change set. I have fixed it
emersonveenstra (2024-06-13 17:48:23+00:00): Thanks!
dypa (2024-06-10 10:52:11+00:00): При указании размеченных не регулируемых пешеходных переходов нельзя использовать тег crossing=zebra, см https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:crossing=zebra

Пожалуйста при внесении следующих правок используйте теги (Размеченный (нерегулируемый) пешеходный переход)
crossing=uncontrolled
crossing:markings=zebra

Заранее спасибо!
Supaplex (2024-06-09 01:55:52+00:00): 請問你新增的點意思是？如果不是設施等存在一定時間的，偏個人記錄的話，不適宜放到OpenStreetMap上面
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152436869
Terry Chiu (2024-06-26 00:08:19+00:00): ？是 Strava 客服部叫我自己來修改地圖的
Strava表面他們公司用的地圖open street map
上面如果有未建立的地址 需要「使用者自己去修改」
你說的不能的規模跟法律在那裡？
Supaplex (2024-06-26 04:00:30+00:00): 你用錯類別了
而且已經存在了
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5117915#map=18/25.03658/121.58601
Terry Chiu (2024-06-26 05:38:43+00:00): Open street map 是公開的 你為何管這麼多？

Strava說 這裡是自由編輯

Hello 邱士豪,
 
Thanks for writing in. The static maps in the Strava feed and on the activity details page are provided by Mapbox, with the data for roads, places, parks, points of interest, and trails sourced from OpenStreetMap.
 
You can learn more about the Maps used on Strava, and how to make contributions, within our support article here: https://support.strava.com/hc/en-us/articles/216917717-About-Strava-Maps
 
If you believe there is data that could benefit from an update, we encourage you to visit OpenStreetMap to share your insights. 
 
Best,
Kirk
Strava Support Team
Terry Chiu (2024-06-26 05:46:08+00:00):  這裡全世界的人都可以提出編輯

跟維基百科一樣 是你自己搞錯了

你自己把自己當成這裡的管理員

你自己往下看

人人可編輯的世界地圖
OpenStreetMap（開放街圖，簡稱 OSM）是自由而且開源的全球地圖，於 2004 年由英國的 Steve Coast 發起，採用類似 Wiki 的協作編輯以及開放的授權與格式。OSM 的地圖由像你一樣的使用者繪製。因為來自一般的使用者，所以內容相當多元。資料的來源可能根據手持 GPS 裝置、航照圖以及其他自由內容，甚至是單靠使用者由於對本地的認識而得。雖然不全是經過專業訓練的人士，但可以產生接近專業地理資訊水準的地圖。 地圖以開放資料庫授權（ODbL）方式授權，可以日常生活、導航、學術、甚至商業應用。
Supaplex (2024-06-27 02:10:45+00:00): 但你用錯類別了，你要加運動場的類別，結果選擇分類是醫院，你就承認錯誤。然後OpenStreetMap是社群共同去繪製，也包括社群發現錯誤資料去修正。
Supaplex (2024-06-27 02:12:28+00:00): 如同維基百科，不要只說維基百科有眾從參與，QA機制也是一樣，眾人共同參與，方式包括直接修改，留言提醒。而牽涉到破壞會有 Data Working Group 的調解去封禁帳號。
Terry Chiu (2024-06-27 05:41:54+00:00): 你是有什麼問題？ 
我改個地圖的連結你跟警察一樣
神經病
你這麼閒喔
Supaplex (2024-06-27 08:53:32+00:00): 如同維基百科一樣靠眾人一齊參與才能成就的線上百科全書，OpenStreetMap 也是由全球的參與者參與繪製，台灣也有社群關注台灣圖資品質，遇到錯誤資訊也會出手修正。

另外提醒一下，這邊是公開的網路平台，需要注意網路禮儀，謾罵的言論也會受到 OpenStreetMap 平台的相關規範，敬請注意
Pty11111 (2024-06-27 10:31:00+00:00): Terry Chiu 是你自己搞不清楚編輯的規則，在那邊罵別人......；維基百科編輯也有規範的。
iigmir (2024-06-27 16:19:26+00:00): @Terry Chiu
額……Supaplex 是 Data Working Group (DWG) 成員，在 OSM 確實是類似警察的存在。
https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Data_Working_Group

另外 `amenity=hospital` 是用在醫院設施的。用在操場有點怪，所以他才會提醒您與修改。望您理解。
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=hospital
GeeMaps! (2024-11-16 22:27:25+00:00): Hi again. Sorry, but you've got me a bit confused with some of you changes here? You've changed a traffic light at the corner of Surfers Ave & GC Hwy into a bus stop, which you've deleted from it's previous location? https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=21/-28.0389296/153.4332518 Is that what you were really trying to do? Thanks!
tashaa432 (2024-11-16 22:52:54+00:00): Thanks for the help, looks like that was a mistake. I've changed it back, thanks for your help
Fizzie-DWG (2024-11-16 23:45:48+00:00): Thanks!
sbre (2024-07-19 15:34:57+00:00): Hi, removed a small glacier you placed by the Gascoyne river, as I can't see one on aerial imagery and the location is highly unlikely. What was you trying to map?
gdt (2025-05-19 15:05:50+00:00): Did you see a no trespassing sign, or merely a small "private way" tag above the street name?  In Massachusetts, "private ways" have an easement to the public, the same as "public ways".  It is merely that maintenance responsibility differs.  L3 parcels shows this as subject to a road easement -- which would have been necessary to obtain planning permission.   So I think this private tagging is wrong and should be removed.
nevw (2024-06-09 04:02:53+00:00): Hi, welcome to the osm.
You are expected to outline the building instead of the plot of land when adding a house.
jhaluska80 (2024-06-09 04:14:49+00:00): Not bad.  I just think you need to add turn restrictions where the one ways join to prevent u-turns.
Matt_ (2024-06-09 04:31:18+00:00): I'm asking for feedback on the tagging I did in this changeset. Please see: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/roadway-tagging-review-and-advice-please/114321
watmildon (2024-06-10 21:17:12+00:00): If you want to be super specific you can split this way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1010397291/history where the sidewalks have been added and have "sidewalk=both" only for the portion where the secondary footways haven't been added yet.
watmildon (2024-06-10 21:19:16+00:00): RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/626017907/ I've been leaving these these kinds of ways unnamed. It avoids routing directions like "turn onto Foo St from Foo St".
watmildon (2024-06-10 21:23:58+00:00): Unrelated to tagging and I see they were added earlier but RE: turning_circle nodes. If there's a planter or other feature in the middle of a cul-de-sac end, I usually draw the way around and use highway=turning_circle nodes for cases when there's only pavement.
isaacibex (2026-06-16 19:27:20+00:00): Hi! Can I ask you a question? I'm noticing that different parts of pacific park drive have different foot tagging. Some areas are tagged as access foot=yes, while others have foot=no plus a separate tag of sidewalks=mapped separately, and still others have a foot=no tag, but no sidewalk notes. A survey of the surrounding primary and secondary roads indicates that the foot=yes tag is much more common, and I would assume that consistency is preferable. You seem like someone knowledgeable and have some of the most recent edits on this road, so I figured I would ask before I make any edits. Is there a good convention for how to edit this? Thanks!
MyoKyawKyaw (2024-06-10 18:25:39+00:00): Location & tags are correct. Thank you for your efforts and contribution.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152438586
KiloThree (2024-06-09 05:31:44+00:00): How does this reflect the "do not enter" "authorized users only", and "no pedestrians, active busway" signs, unless those have been taken down recently?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152438667
Jordan Moldow (2024-06-20 03:54:00+00:00): Rolled back in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152922510
A67-A67 (2024-12-12 13:36:25+00:00): Hi, 
Circle K and OK are different companies. In this case OK was correct. I've reverted the mistake.
pitfire (2024-12-13 05:13:50+00:00): @ A67-A67
Yes, thank you, the operators have changed here in the last few years. I only come here for vacation every year and didn't notice my mistake.
Greetings pitfire
akimapbuilder (2024-06-10 10:27:32+00:00): Try to match building geometry from satellite imagery.  Thanks!
julcnx (2024-06-09 16:45:07+00:00): Hi there! Thank you for your contributions! Just a friendly tip for next time, it's a good practice to save and upload your changes before moving on to the next area. You can find more information on changesets and their geographical size at: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
AlwynWellington (2024-07-15 04:40:38+00:00): @julcnx
Thank you.
I think moving about 180 degrees and 12 time zones is a record for me.
Regretably, I had got quite fed up, as I was follwoing a route I hope to walk in 2025, of what I saw as so, so many egregious previous mappings.  Here, compared with the aerial imagery, paths had been mapped through natural woods without a visible path, in the water  and so on. Over many miles.
I just needed to work at something that I could make a real difference with.
I had taken a few minutes time-out, and when I returned ...
It was a one-off situation.
And, hopefully, will not be repeated.

Again, thank you for reminding me.
Again, thanks for
i2004 (2024-06-09 19:52:32+00:00): recien te puse nueva parada del 59 golf y autopista en alberdi y garay
erickdeoliveiraleal (2024-07-10 16:09:49+00:00): não é correto colocar nomes genericos tipo "pomar" "pequeno jardim" "campinho de futebol" senao existe um nome proprio melhor deixar em branco.
Jordan Moldow (2024-06-20 03:53:54+00:00): Rolled back in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152922510
empty_child (2024-06-09 17:39:12+00:00): Your changesets were reverted. Stop vandalize the region
rskedgell (2024-07-24 17:15:47+00:00): The tagging you probably wanted here is access=customers. A petrol station forecourt with motor_vehicles=no seems unlikely. Reverted.
tastrax (2024-06-09 10:57:53+00:00): Hi Folks - There has recently been an Aussie wide cleanup of addresses including numbers like 21,23 (both addr:housenumber and addr:unit). The norm is now 21-23 and I do a daily check to update them. Feel free to use a dash in preference to a comma (bit easier on some devices).

I have just updated your recent additions

Cheers
KiloThree (2024-06-09 12:51:29+00:00): What is this based off of? There's a total of about 2 benches in this whole area
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152440441
Noen (2024-08-22 18:11:15+00:00): Kjøring på privat vei er i utgangspunktet tillat, der grunneier ikke har tydelig forbudt det. Bruk motorkjøretøy / motor_vehicle = private der grunneier tydelig har forbudt motorkjøretøy. Et eksempel på et tydelig forbud er et skilt hvor det står «Forbud for motorvogn uten tillatelse fra grunneier», et skilt hvor det står «privat» er strengt tatt ikke det. Er veien sperret med bom? Kartlegg selve bommen.
Grunneier har ikke anledning til å forby gående og syklende på vei utenfor gårdstun og industriområde.
Ønsker du å kartlegge veieier? Bruk ownership=private.
MKnight (2024-06-09 15:51:13+00:00): Moin, Du holst die Überlappungen nicht zufällig von osmose?
Wenn ja, wäre es ganz schon, wenn Du die dort auf erledigt setzt.
unni-geo (2024-07-04 14:55:01+00:00): Moin moin.

Ja richtig.

Hatte ich tatsächlich auch schon drüber nachgedacht, aber dann doch aus 2 Gründen davon abgesehen.:

- die Osmose Datenbank ist glücklicherweise recht aktuell und wird zu ca. 95% täglich aktuallisiert :-)

- Ich bin mir nicht immer sicher, ob ich tätsächlich alle Überlappungen um den Marker (oder auch häufiger um die Marker) herum erwische. Mehrmals sehe ich dann an der Stelle, an der ich tags zuvor etwas gemacht habe, dass ich was übersehen habe und Marker stehengeblieben sind
MKnight (2024-07-04 16:47:42+00:00): Wenn Du die als erledigt markierst, bekommst Du "Deine Fehler" morgen nochmal neu serviert.
wenn die nicht erledigt markiert sind, bekommen die korrigierten halt alle nochmal, die im selben Bereich unterwegs sind. (ok, ok, viele Leute sinds nicht, aber ist halt verschwendete Zeit)
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-10-14 14:35:03+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11965991069

is it weather shelter?

social facility?

what is its English name? "Safe Space Durbanville" or "Shelter"?
sanch3z (2024-06-21 22:29:16+00:00): Hi Paradine,

ich hätte mal eine Frage zu deinen Changesets. Woher beziehst du die Informationen über die Aufteilung der Landwirtschaftsflächen? Beispielsweise: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1290597257, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1290597256, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1290597258, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1290597259, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1290597260 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1290597270 decken sich nicht mit halbwegs aktuellen Luftbildern (Bavaria 80cm).

Ich denke es wäre besser zusammenhängende landwirtschaftlich genutzte Flächen als eine einzige Fläche zu kartieren anstatt diese anhand veralteter Luftbilder aufzuteilen. Konntest du die Auftrennung der Felder, wie du sie eingezeichnet hast, vor Ort verifizieren?

Grüße
sanch3z
euroPathfinder (2024-06-13 21:32:46+00:00): Dieser Änderungssatz wurde revertiert.
Gazer75 (2024-08-04 18:45:42+00:00): Please do not add small road link segments to intersections unless its a slip separated from the rest. Also the same for bus stops and passing places.
Warin61 (2024-06-10 00:38:20+00:00): Source?

Relations not closed
17693188
17693197
17693193
17693192

Possibly more ....
TheSwavu (2024-06-10 02:12:43+00:00): Several other problems:

1. These are not real bounded localities
2. Admin level 6 and 9 are a maintained import from PSMA https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue/PSMA_Admin_Boundaries

If you want to change how this is done please open a topic on the OSM community forum and outline why you want to change it https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/oceania/73
3. Admin boundaries are advanced mapping. I would suggest that you at least wait until after you learn to use JOSM before attempting to edit them.

Thank you.
NeisBot (2024-06-09 08:12:25+00:00): Hi Marc2357293875, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1290605284

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-10 15:03:04+00:00): Thanks for your mapped beaches.
Looks good.

#HappyMapping
Leo U (2024-06-11 19:42:30+00:00): die meisten Bäume in meiner Gegend werden nicht mehr landwirtschaftlich genützt, daher finde ich denotation=agricultural nicht ganz richtig.
Gruß Leo
bxl-forever (2024-06-09 11:03:09+00:00): Por favor, no utilice el mismo comentario para todos tus cambios.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenos_comentarios_en_conjuntos_de_cambios
felipeeugenio (2024-06-09 13:27:58+00:00): Hola. por favor mapear con cuidado la base de las casas. Es claro que algunas de las casas de la imagen no tienen la forma que les dio en OSM. La idea es calidad y no cantidad. Saludos
felipeeugenio (2024-06-09 13:29:31+00:00): Además, para estos barrios en que las casas son todas casi iguales, es cosa de dibujar una y después copiar y pegar y dedicarse a las diferencias.
Saludos
felipeeugenio (2024-06-09 13:31:34+00:00): ahi las dejé cuadradas y de acuerdo a lo que se observa en las imágenes Esri.
saludos
MarinoBM (2024-06-09 22:43:59+00:00): Hola nig82, esta edición tiene múltiples errores:
El mismo edificio lo has hecho dos veces, los multipolígonos tienen áreas en vez de líneas y el rol inner no sirve para partes exteriores.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17693320
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17693321
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon#Tags
El contorno de este otro edificio, si se quieren representar las distintas partes, tiene que llevar las características del edificio (building:levels=4) y estar totalmente relleno de building:part.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Edificios_3D_sencillos#C%C3%B3mo_mapear
Si necesitas ayuda puedes consultar en https://t.me/OSMes
Sean Lax (2024-06-09 08:34:38+00:00): https://ga.de/bonn/beuel/friedrich-breuer-strasse-in-beuel-wie-sich-die-verkehrsfuehrung-aendert_aid-113476061
limes11 (2024-06-09 12:02:08+00:00): Hi, 

das sieht eigenartig aus. Zumindest der Obstladen sollte zugänglich sein. 

Wo steht denn hier ein Schild, welches die Nutzung einschränkt und was steht drauf ?

Viele Grüße
Jule_Beuel (2024-06-09 12:53:16+00:00): Hi Limes,
Das stimmt, bis zum Waldbeginn ist der Weg nicht privat. Habs korrigiert. Hatte ich heute Abend ohnehin noch vor.
(Nur zum Verständnis: ich mach die Änderungen in der Regel am Smartphone unterwegs, direkt wenn ich feststelle, dass etwas nicht stimmt. Punkte markieren, um Wege in zwei Teile zu trennen, ist am Telefon extrem frickelig.)
LG und einen schönen Sonntag 
Jule
Jule_Beuel (2024-06-09 12:54:02+00:00): Und es steht auf dem Schild: Privatweg (nur für Kunden, Besucher, Anwohner).
limes11 (2024-06-09 17:43:46+00:00): alles klar !

In dem Fall ist das access=customers; destination

Die Besitzverhältnisse werden nicht, oder wenn unbedingt nötig mit ownership=private, erfasst
hatul (2024-07-02 09:21:49+00:00): שלום יובל ותודה על התרומות למפה. העץ כבר מופיע במפה אז בבקשה לא להוסיף נקודות כפולות. מיזגתי את שתי הנקודות.
YuvalW (2024-07-02 09:39:35+00:00): היי,
נכון, אבל זה הופיע כסימבול ולא כנקודה שניתן להוסיף לה תמונה או תיאור. רק רציתי להוסיף תמונה ונראה שהוספת נקודת עניין היתה הדרך היחידה...
hatul (2024-07-02 09:44:51+00:00): לא הייתה נקודה כי לא היה מידע נוסף.
אבל כשאתה מוסיף נקודה חדשה ליד נקודה קיימת אתה נשאל אם תרצה לעדכן אותה.
בכל מקרה, בדרך כלל לא נכון להשתמש באטרקציה, אלא לבחור סוג, במקרה הזה עץ.
אפשר גם לעבוד עם העורך של OSM כדי לעדכן את כל הנקודות.
YuvalW (2024-07-02 10:12:27+00:00): אוקיי,
עכשיו אני רואה שבהוספת נקודת ענין, אם אני לוחץ על "עוד" אז נשאלת שאלה "האם תרצה לעדכן את נקודה ללא שם", אנסה בפעם הבאה
hatul (2024-07-02 10:18:08+00:00): מצוין
frspp (2024-06-21 17:28:01+00:00): You deleted at least one new road. What was our source? Not survey?
frspp (2024-06-21 17:31:44+00:00): might be this one https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11500834343
frspp (2024-06-21 17:36:08+00:00): Joulumaantie. Build last year. Aerial imagery is not upto date for long...
frspp (2024-06-21 17:41:19+00:00): So please revert everything you deleted
nurdafur (2025-05-15 09:17:00+00:00): Hallo Pemu
Du hast hier für deine Anpasungen ein veraltetes Luftbild verwendet. Es hilft manchmal, zwischen den verschiedenen verfügbaren Bildern hin und her zu wechseln. Ich habe die Wege wieder auf die Situation vor Ort angepasst.
Liebe Grüße und weiterhin viel Spaß beim Kartografieren
philam48 (2026-02-11 00:06:52+00:00): Hi there,
I noticed that street classifications have changed, such as Queen Street. I'm wondering what your source is for changing the hierarchy? 
Many thanks
NorthCrab_upload (2024-06-09 09:50:29+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/904968612

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-18 18:20:05+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/774799539/history has fixme = yes that was added in this edit
What requires fixing here? fixme=yes is not particularly clear, and maybe problem got fixed since then?
aTarom (2024-06-09 10:45:50+00:00): Hola, es un accidente eliminar este nodo
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1446993958/history
y crear otro
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11966198630/history
?
El historial se debe conservar, dime si se trata de un error o no
limes11 (2024-06-09 12:08:06+00:00): Moin

das war hier erfasst

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4676380321

Hab das Duplikat wieder entfernt. 

VG
felipeeugenio (2024-06-09 13:25:47+00:00): Hola. Si seleccionas todas las casas y usas la letra Q, se te "cuadran" todas las casas. Te quedan con ángulos rectos.

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152446796
v4g0 (2024-06-09 14:28:37+00:00): ¡Muchas Gracias!
Así lo haré de ahora en adelante.
rab (2024-06-09 12:17:41+00:00): changed as suggested

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11964860719/history

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17693965

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11966349223

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152451850
emersonveenstra (2024-06-13 17:36:56+00:00): Hi there,

You created https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1290621527 with no tags, could you please go back and tag it? Thanks!
NeisBot (2024-06-09 10:30:25+00:00): Hi solario713, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1290621977

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-10 08:08:42+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152485379
eggie (2024-06-10 07:36:30+00:00): Beste Shantos.. Je plakt je grasveld aan de landuse=residential van Hattem. Beter niet doen.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-06-10 07:42:25+00:00): Landuse overlap opgelost en landuse grass losgemaakt van landuse=residential..
Je ziet het gebied van je edits is heel groot geworden.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-06-10 07:43:14+00:00): Je eigen edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=152448329
bxl-forever (2024-06-09 11:35:27+00:00): Hello,
Shouldn’t this tag preferably be added to the "man_made=bridge" object rather than the relation?  I fear no-one parses this tag along a bridge relation.
What do you think?
NorthCrab_upload (2024-06-09 10:50:26+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11966248316

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eggie (2024-06-09 11:55:11+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback Ik vraag me af of dit hele gebied als parkeerterrein geduid kan worden. Het lijkt me realistischer om amenity =parking te gebruiken met de tag parking=street_side en dan kun je je parkeervakken daar in behouden.
Zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:parking%3Dstreet_side 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
NeisBot (2024-06-09 11:00:24+00:00): Hi solario713, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1290625096

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-10 08:08:29+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152485373
VA00 (2024-11-17 13:36:08+00:00): Chyba chodzi o to pod dębem, nad starorzeczem Wisły, po przeciwnej stronie wału?