piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Map_HeRo (2026-07-13 09:12:07+00:00): Hallo Markus,
danke für Dein Feedback. Der Titel des Buches ist bereits in der Beschreibung erfasst. Den Namen für das Kunstwerk habe ich wohl übersehen, Wenn das Teil tatsächlich "Freiheitsflügel" heißt (wie kommt man nur auf so einen dämlichen Namen ...?), gehört der Name natürlich dran, aber dann ohne "Fotostation" (siehe dazu auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only).

Und Himmelsschaukel ist m.E. kein Name, sondern eine etwas überspannte Beschreibung für die Schaukelbank. Nicht jedes Objekt hat einen Namen oder muss einen haben.

Viele Grüße Mikke
mv1005 (2026-07-14 09:00:00+00:00): Hi Mikke,

deine Vorschläge klingen gut. Danke für die Korrekturen.

Zum Namen "Freiheitsflügel" fällt mir ein: Da dort früher die innerdeutsche Grenze verlief, könnte der Name des Kunstwerkes auf die mit der Wende wiedergewonnenen Freiheit der Bürger der ehem. DDR hindeuten.

LG
Map_HeRo (2026-07-14 17:32:43+00:00): Klar nimmt der "Freiheitsflügel" Bezug auf die ehemalige DDR-Grenze. Mir erschließt sich nur nicht, warum man dort jedem zweiten Objekt jetzt den Zusatz "Freiheit" oder "Frieden" mit der Brechstange anhängen muss ... ;-))
eggie (2026-07-09 11:01:21+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
bxl-forever (2026-07-09 20:09:06+00:00): Hello,

I inspected your change and on this recent picture, taken a few months ago, it looks like an ordinary one-way street without any marked lanes.
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=868380186149329

I don’t see any painting to separate the car lanes or to separate motor traffic in both directions, because there is just one.

Probably a confusion with the painted dashes for the contraflow cycle lane.  This cycle lane was already tagged as "cycleway:left=lane".

I am afraid that your edit is incorrect.  I’ll revert it.

Something else now: It looks like you've chosen a username containing HTML, and other special characters. Whether it was meant as a reference to the classic "Little Bobby Tables" joke or as a test, we're not particularly amused by it. It tends to create unnecessary work and isn't the kind of first impression we'd like to encourage. Could you please choose a normal username instead? We'd be happy to have you here, and we look forward to your contributions under a regular name. Thanks for understanding!
arbrarbra (2026-07-12 12:50:27+00:00): Hi,
Yes my bad I guess I didn't fully understand what was a lane marking in this context, I'll stick to things I understand for sure in the future :)
Thanks !
cyclist789 (2026-07-15 13:55:44+00:00): Kan De bekræfte, om der løber *to* veje fra node/1785666658 til parkeringspladsen (way/732038676)? Kun den vestlige er synlig på terrænskyggekortet.

PS: Jeg vil anbefale at bruge terrænskyggekort til at forøge præcisionen af de stier, som De tegner.
clindemann (2026-07-15 19:31:38+00:00): Ja, den der er tættest vandet er mere en trampe/gangsti, som også går gennem lejerpladsen
clindemann (2026-07-15 19:39:40+00:00): Jeg plottede vejen (det nye stykke) ind mens jeg gik på den, så GPS koordinaterne er måske lidt off. Jeg prøver at rette den lidt ud fra luftfoto hvis jeg kan finde et bedre
cyclist789 (2026-07-16 08:40:37+00:00): Det kan sagtens tænkes, at terrænskyggekortet bare er for gammelt til at vise netop den sti.

Men når man tegner stier i skove er det bedst at bruge terrænskyggekort til at rette stierne til efter. Det er et kort der viser terrænet uden træerne.

Stierne er tegnet meget skæve i netop denne skov, men der er vist også andre, der er ansvarlige for det, så måske skulle jeg lave en Note i stedet.

Terrænskyggekortet er tilgængeligt i iD-editoren, men hvis du er allergisk overfor den (som visse jo er), så kan du se kortet som "Danmarks Højdemodel -> Skyggekort terræn overdrevet" på
https://kortoverblik.dk/modules/mobile/
Marvk (2026-07-09 13:17:10+00:00): Hallo Adges,

die Änderungen an https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/312713332 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/31905 ergeben für mich keinen Sinn.

Der Weg ist offensichtlich kein playground=climbingwall und auch der Klingenpfad ist, wie vorher getaggt, eine Wanderroute.

Kannst du erzählen, was du mit dieser Änderung bezwecken wolltest?

Beste Grüße
Marv
pitscheplatsch (2026-07-09 10:41:07+00:00): Hi, willkommen bei OSM.
Existiert der hinzugefügte Name wirklich?
Mr. past (1804154675), v3
habi (2026-07-10 13:44:30+00:00): Hey Höseler
Wie schon in zwei von deinen vier Changesets bemerkt, Namen sollten nicht einfach so vergeben werden, ausser das Ding hat "wirklich" einen Namen.
Dass ein Baumstrunk so heissen soll, kann ich mir nicht vorstellen.
Wenn du für eine Jungschar-Aktivität (oder so) eine Karte mit lustigen Dingen brauchst, bist du mit https://umap.osm.ch/en/ evtl. besser bedient.
Gruss,
habi
habi (2026-07-10 13:56:26+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1536807604 braucht wohl keine Bewilligung um drin zu baden, sondern ist schlichtwegs ein privater Pool im Garten.
Ich habe das auf `access=private` geändert.
Jakka (2026-07-09 10:52:05+00:00): Is dit wel een officiële zichtbare benoeming van de woning ?
Zoniet beter verwijderen.
ajmat (2026-07-10 11:10:17+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185467678
kitsee (2026-07-09 19:41:20+00:00): Hi David,
Findmystreet uses copyrighted OS data and as such cannot be used a source when contributing to OSM.
trigpoint (2026-07-13 14:08:41+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/185655322
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:44:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321604 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Syria
ceirios (2026-07-10 13:31:36+00:00): It's been a while since I was in Ferryside last but I'm not sure if this road is signed at all.
trigpoint (2026-07-13 14:08:37+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/185655322
maxwellward (2026-07-09 15:56:07+00:00): Hi Portal Master,

It looks like you've added a lot of amenity=shelter nodes on top of the buildings that are here. Why is this?

amenity=shelter is usually for freestanding shelters in public or private areas designed to protect for weather and sun, like a bus stop shelter or picnic table cover.

Thanks,
Max
MappingMore (2026-07-10 12:26:59+00:00): Reverted in  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185471519
infeeeee (2026-07-09 14:11:49+00:00): Szia! A szökőkút már szerepelt a térképen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/223261686 

Visszavonva: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185410797

Hello! The fountain was already mapped: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/223261686 

Reverted: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185410797
maro21 (2026-07-12 22:24:22+00:00): No to wewnątrz czy na zewnątrz?
Preben Vangberg (2026-07-09 11:23:47+00:00): I've added the restaurant. Resolved: changeset/185401372
Preben Vangberg (2026-07-09 11:24:42+00:00): Lol added the comment the wrong place
mcliquid (2026-07-09 13:21:19+00:00): Hallo wolfshafen,

danke für deine Änderungen.

Mich würde interessieren, auf welcher Quelle sie basieren. Hast du sie ausschließlich anhand von Luftbildern vorgenommen oder standen dir noch weitere Quellen zur Verfügung?

Einige Änderungen wirken auf mich so, als würden sie den Stand von etwa 2020–2022 widerspiegeln und nicht mehr den heutigen Gegebenheiten vor Ort entsprechen. Daher wäre es hilfreich, wenn du kurz angeben könntest, welche Quellen du verwendet hast. Das erleichtert die Nachvollziehbarkeit der Änderungen.

Vielen Dank!
wolfshafen (2026-07-09 16:54:26+00:00): Hallo mcliquid,
ich habe mir heute die Veränderungen direkt vor Ort angeschaut, beim karieren habe ich zusätzlich das Luftbild (als Orientierungsjilfe) verwendet, das von iD (dem Online-Editor) vorgegeben ist.
Es wäre hilfreich, wenn du die von dir in Frage gestellten Änderungen konkret benennst, ansonsten kann ich diese nicht kommentieren.
DressyPear4 (2026-07-09 13:30:24+00:00): Se é 60 por que a placa diz que é 50?
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-22.802011489868008&lng=-42.962638854980014&z=18.345151496766032&focus=photo&dateFrom=2017-01-01&pKey=474091177150134&x=0.49696854046289285&y=0.5644320819752195&zoom=0
DressyPear4 (2026-07-09 13:24:33+00:00): Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/185407578
rarad74 (2026-07-10 09:54:47+00:00): Hi. It is the last time when i tell you and your coleagues. I thing you already have enough experience now, in order to observe from images - for example that around the service road you drawed withouth any aditional tag - is a parking space. Please add service road category - in this case parking aisle and surface tag - asphalt. All parking spaces with parcels whithe markins are asphalted. There is a big difference in quality of what we added until now and what you add on this map. Only some drawings is not enough. We must work after you to add/correct missing tags every time we observe that you edit in some places.
KarooDesert (2026-07-13 17:45:45+00:00): Hi rarad74,
Thank you for reaching out and adding in the service and surface tags, I will be more careful about adding this in next time and will defer to your edits.
pitscheplatsch (2026-07-09 13:12:09+00:00): Revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185375874

Again, @Libya-truth, where can I find a discussion of your recent mapping activities on the OSM Community Forum? Given that several of your recent edits have been reverted, this question keeps coming up for me.

In addition, some of the questions I left on your changesets are still unanswered. Could you please respond to them and point me to any relevant forum discussion or community consensus?
Can I find a d
Libya-truth (2026-07-09 13:35:39+00:00): Hello Pascal,

You keep asking me to open a forum discussion and seek "community consensus." Let me ask you a direct question:

Who exactly would participate in this discussion?

Look at this changeset's comment section. It is you and me. You have already stated that you are "not a local contributor in Libya" and "not a specialist in multilingual name tagging." The person who reverted my edits (Peter Maris) also has no connection to Libya and has been reported for calling indigenous script "vandalism."

The Libyan OSM community is extremely small. There is no active Libya talk page, no active Libya mailing list, no active Libya forum thread with regular local contributors waiting to weigh in. If I open a forum discussion, the participants will be: me, you, and perhaps Peter Maris two people with no connection to Libya and one actual Libyan.

You are asking an indigenous person to seek permission from non-local outsiders to name places in their own country in their own language.

Think about what that means. Would you ask a Welsh speaker to open a forum discussion and get consensus from non-Welsh outsiders before adding Welsh names to villages in Wales? Would you ask a Sámi speaker to prove community consensus before naming their own towns in Sámi?

I have already:

Provided detailed academic sources (Kossmann, Lewicki, Provasi, Khelifa, Beguinot)
Cited the Libyan Constitutional Declaration (2011) guaranteeing Amazigh linguistic rights
Cited UNESCO's classification of these languages as endangered
Cited ISO 639-3 language codes confirming these are recognized living languages
Explained that these are indigenous names, not transliterations
Shown OSM precedent from Morocco, Algeria, Wales, Basque Country, Ireland, and Sámi regions
As for your unanswered questions: I responded in detail to every point you raised — scroll up. I addressed Brussels, provided evidence for specific places, explained the legal basis, and cited academic references. If you have a question about a specific place name that I have not addressed, please ask it and I will answer.

But I will not submit indigenous language rights to an approval process run by people who do not speak the language, do not live in the country, and have no local knowledge. The Amazigh people of Libya do not need outside permission to exist on the map.

Best regards
pitscheplatsch (2026-07-09 13:12:50+00:00): Revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185376001
pitscheplatsch (2026-07-09 13:24:57+00:00): I am concerned that this situation could develop into an edit war, as some of your recent edits are now being reverted by other mapper(s).

Please discuss these disputed changes on the OSM Community Forum before continuing with similar edits, and provide a link to the discussion here.

In addition to my questions, another mapper has asked for the sources supporting your map changes. That question, along with several questions on your other changesets, remains unanswered.
Libya-truth (2026-07-09 13:39:17+00:00): Hello Pascal,

You are right to be concerned about an edit war but let's be precise about who started it.

I added indigenous language names. Peter Maris then made 7 changesets in one evening removing them from 79 elements across the entire country, calling the indigenous script "vandalism." That is the aggression. My restoration of indigenous names is the defense.

An "edit war" implies two equal sides in a dispute. This is not that. This is one mapper with no connection to Libya systematically erasing an indigenous language, and an indigenous person restoring it.

I agree that someone with authority needs to intervene and make a decision.

I have already:

Filed a formal report against Peter Maris with OSM moderators
Provided extensive academic sources in this very comment thread (Kossmann, Lewicki, Provasi, Khelifa, Beguinot — all peer-reviewed)
Cited Libya's Constitutional Declaration (2011, Article 1) guaranteeing Amazigh linguistic rights
Cited UNESCO's classification of these languages as endangered
Cited ISO 639-3 codes confirming these as recognized living languages
Responded in detail to every question raised here scroll up
What I ask from moderators/administrators:

Review the history of this region the Amazigh people are the indigenous population of Libya and North Africa, their language predates Arabic in this region by millennia
Review Peter Maris's edit pattern 7 changesets in rapid succession, no discussion, ignored warnings from VLD0251, called indigenous script "vandalism" and misidentified it as "Moroccan Tamazight"
Review the evidence I have provided academic sources, constitutional references, UNESCO documentation, ISO language codes
Make a binding decision so that indigenous language names are protected from unilateral removal by non-local mappers
On the forum discussion: I will open a topic on the OSM Community Forum. But I want to state clearly: if the outcome of that discussion is decided by people who have no connection to Libya and no knowledge of Amazigh languages, while actual indigenous voices are absent, that is not "community consensus"  that is outsider veto over indigenous rights.

I will provide the forum link here once created.

Best regards
user_15543111 (2026-07-09 14:25:25+00:00): Hello Libya-truth, 

I did not remove any of your names out of good-faith, they are all kept in the name:ber tag, but I did not found any official or local souces supporting your names. Most of the names seem to be transliterations, not names used in the government or by local communities.

You however removed the Arabic name, for which there are plenty of sources, so please stop that.
Libya-truth (2026-07-09 14:52:56+00:00): Hello Peter,

Let me correct several false statements in your message.

1. "You removed the Arabic name"

This is simply not true. I did not remove a single Arabic name from any element. Every element has its full Arabic name preserved in name:ar=*. The name=* tag contains a bilingual format with Arabic fully included — for example: name=ⵟⴰⵕⴰⴱⵍⵓⵙ طرابلس Tripoli. The Arabic "طرابلس" is right there. Nothing was removed.

If you believe I removed Arabic from any specific element, please name it. You will not find one.

2. "They are all kept in the name:ber tag"

This is also not true. You deleted name:ber entirely from several elements, including:

way/138017567 (الهروج الأسود)
way/419102982 (محاجر الجفرة)
way/152290128 (الجبل الغربي)
way/152290140 (النقاط الخمس)
way/152290141 (النقاط الخمس)
So you did not keep "all" of them.

3. "Most of the names seem to be transliterations"

You called the Tifinagh script "Moroccan Tamazight" in your changeset comment. With respect, this tells me you do not know the difference between Moroccan Tamazight, Nafusi, Tamashek, and Zuaran — all of which are distinct Amazigh languages native to Libya. If you cannot distinguish between these languages, how can you determine what is a "transliteration" and what is a genuine indigenous name?

For your reference:

Ghat (ⵖⴰⵜ) a Tuareg-speaking town where Tifinagh is the native script. Not a transliteration.
Nafusa Mountains (ⴰⴷⵔⴰⵔ ⵏ ⵉⵏⴼⵓⵙⵏ) — the Arabic name "الجبل الغربي" is the generic translation. The Amazigh name is the original. Documented in Khelifa, A. "Nefoussa," Encyclopédie berbère, vol. 33, 2012.
Ghadames (ⵖⴷⴰⵎⵙ) attested since Roman times as Cydamus, a Latinization of the Amazigh name. Pliny the Elder, 77 CE.
4. "I did not find any official or local sources"

I provided extensive academic sources in the changeset discussion Kossmann, Lewicki, Provasi, Khelifa, Beguinot  all peer-reviewed. I cited Libya's Constitutional Declaration (2011, Article 1), UNESCO's endangered languages classification, and ISO 639-3 language codes. Did you read any of them?

5. The real question

Peter, you made 7 changesets in one evening removing an indigenous language from 79 elements across an entire country you have no connection to, without any prior discussion, while another mapper (VLD0251) warned you to stop. You called the indigenous script of North Africa "vandalism."

Where are YOUR sources that justify removing an indigenous language from its own homeland?

Best regards
eggie (2026-07-09 12:29:20+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
CireR (2026-07-16 10:42:37+00:00): Based on what except for the imagery are your changes? This is the third time you changed the road in a way that is not representing the reality nor is usable in navigation systems. What you are drawing as two different roads here, is in reality one and the same with a pedestrian island at the intersection. I'd kindly ask you to revert these changes. Thanks.
eggie (2026-07-09 12:31:32+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback Geef svp concreet aan wat je hebt gedaan.
Dat stellen medemappers op prijs. Gebouwen klrijgen niet nogmaals een adres op de gebouwomtrek. Er zijn al importadresnodes vanuit het Kadaster (BAGimport) 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-07-09 12:35:15+00:00): De Boutweg zet je op access=no. Dat is Verboden Toegang. Welk bord staat hier vooraan?
eggie (2026-07-09 12:39:30+00:00): Tip  Langsliggende trottoirs op deze manier ingetekend routeren niet. Je zit er op gevangen. De tagging kan ook in de hoofdrijbaan met sidewalk=left right of both. 
Oversteken of routeren voor voetgangers lukt zo niet.
eggie (2026-07-09 12:42:17+00:00): Ik heb wat niet routeert verwijderd en paden die loodrecht op wegen uitkomen doorverbonden.
Kijk even hier wat gebruikelijk is.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sidewalks

Het mag overigens wel, maar dan moet je overal voor verbindingen zorgen. Het zal anders nier routeren.
eggie (2026-07-09 12:47:54+00:00): Duplikaat adressen heb ik verwijderd. Dat geeft foutmeldingen en verwarring.
Alle begin is moeilijk... zeker starten met OSM.
Mapse
eggie (2026-07-09 12:53:36+00:00): access=yes svp niet op wegen gaan taggen. Ook geen foot=yes. Dat is default.
eggie (2026-07-09 13:17:21+00:00): De Boutweg heb ik aangepast naar een veldweg (track) met access=private
Staat er wel een bord Verboden Toegang vooraan.
eggie (2026-07-09 14:43:11+00:00): Weet je nog wat je hebt bewerkt aan al die Busroutes?
danieldegroot2 (2026-07-09 16:41:09+00:00): Hoi Eggie,

Lijkt dat de weg gesplitst is op dit punt
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12712826041

Je kan de veranderingen hier visueel terugzien. In het linkermenu kan je bij het kaartsymbool 'Unchanged' uitzetten als je de busroute(s) niet wilt zien.
https://osmcha.org/changesets/185403292

OSMCha kan niet zo goed omgaan met relaties overigens, daar zijn andere gereedschappen voor.
eggie (2026-07-09 16:56:11+00:00): Daniël bedankt.
Ik heb de splits ook ongedaan gemaakt. Alle routerelaties zijn nog oke hier.
Dat pad naar de van Cralingenstraat lag los en heb ik op twee plaatsen verbonden met de hoofdrijbanen.

Groet,
eggie
eggie (2026-07-10 08:58:11+00:00): De Kruisweg is niet unpaved. Ik heb het weer aangepast naar asphalt
Fraxi (2026-07-09 13:44:19+00:00): Дано не се сърдиш, че пак коментирам твоя промяна :D. Значи, за https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9764796283/ си отбелязал, че "На витрината адресът е некоретно записан като "Лерин 57"." Може и така да е. Но това е ъглова сграда. За пример виж колко входове и адреси има по тази сграда -https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/166217995. Чак и бележка имаше... По кадастър наистина цялата се води на ул. "Проф. Димитър Атанасов" 8А. Но и кадастъра не е застрахован никак от грешки. Логически и следвайки подредбата и посоката, това трябва да е на "Лерин №57". "Калин" е на №55 по кадастър. ОСВЕН ако някъде при тунела(https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1415578255) встрани не се е намърдало входчето №57...
Kaloan-koko (2026-07-25 06:05:47+00:00): Ще разгледам скоро пак, защото и без това съм почти сигурен, че има 2-3 неотбелязани празни офиса оттам до края на улицата в посока бул. България.
Fraxi (2026-07-25 16:40:10+00:00): Значи, точно на ъгъла, вляво до дрогерията, има едно като малка пластинка(даже не е и правоъгълна) и там пише "кв. Бели брези" ул. Лерин №57. Даже са 3 такива пластинки, но на едната е само на английски и без квартала. Отбелязвам го и като адрес.
Fraxi (2026-07-25 16:49:21+00:00): Значи, точно на ъгъла, вляво до дрогерията, има едно като малка пластинка(даже не е и правоъгълна) и там пише "кв. Бели брези" ул. Лерин №57. Даже са 3 такива пластинки, но на едната е само на английски и без квартала. Отбелязвам го и като адрес.
Fraxi (2026-07-25 16:49:46+00:00): Без да искам
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-09 13:26:37+00:00): SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. See https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more information.

Reverted adding SEO spam POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags, likely sourced from Google Maps, in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/185407663
eggie (2026-07-09 12:33:30+00:00): Geef svp aan wat je hebt gedaan. 
Wijzigingen in mijn woonplaats zegt helemaal niets.
Je toevoegingen zijn oke hier.

MVG
eggie
danieldegroot2 (2026-07-09 16:52:57+00:00): capacity:disabled kan je in de meeste gevallen leeglaten. Deze kan je altijd nog later invullen bijv. met de app StreetComplete die je vragen stelt over wat je om je heen ziet
http://streetcomplete.app/

let wel op, antwoord alleen als je de vragen en antwoorden begrijpt. Als het goed is kan je altijd op een info-icoontje drukken maar dat geeft wellicht niet altijd duidelijkheid.

...of eventueel met straatfoto's die in de iD editor beschikbaar gesteld worden (nog weinig in Nederland) of historische PDOK luchtfoto's (moet je wel eerst weten hoe ermee te werken en er staan altijd wel auto's).
We mogen geen bronnen met auteursrecht gebruiken natuurlijk, zie
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google
wel hebben we toestemming om enkele bronnen te gebruiken, daar kan je in het forum meer over vinden (zie het welkomstbericht van eggie).
Rawmance (2026-07-19 07:30:42+00:00): Taas näköjään sattumanvaraisesti muutettu polkuja pyöräteiksi joissa ei ole ikinä käyty...