piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
evod (2024-12-21 14:33:42+00:00): By the way you could check out the JOSM editor, it has a bit of a learning curve but when you get the hang of it it is more convenient - especially for more complex edits. (E.g. it has a nice plugin to quickly create turning restrictions)
KarlaIbrahić (2024-12-20 08:02:50+00:00): Reverted because node was created. #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160422188
Michaall99 (2024-12-23 10:18:55+00:00): Cześć, możesz podać źródło danych dotyczących tego masztu?
felipeeugenio (2024-12-19 18:45:48+00:00): Hola. No usamos nombres en las demarcaciones urbanas de OSM para los pueblos/ciudades. Por favor consultar esto en la comunidad para mayores explicaciones.
saludos
kortgodt (2024-12-20 06:08:46+00:00): Please revert this changeset. There is all kinds of tagging mistakes. Wrong access, street names etc.
englu (2024-12-20 10:57:16+00:00): Co to jest za bariera w węźle 12433904528? Jakiś szlaban? Czy pieszo można przejść?
englu (2024-12-20 10:59:05+00:00): I drugie pytanie o węzeł 12433904508 - czy tam nie ma możliwości przejścia pieszego?
VA00 (2024-12-20 17:08:37+00:00): Pierwsza to prowizoryczna stała zapora z okrąglaków:

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/iilk37i5e2pob31ob1j52/IMG_2445.jpg?rlkey=rxz8zstqzul2nxuycw0nymhpa&st=tpx1x7je&dl=0

W drugim ziemia się zapadła i pochłonęła całą drogę. Można chyba pieszo obejść  to dookoła, ale się nie odważyłem:

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/jbj20oxwxj3hu5fztvinw/IMG_2447.JPG?rlkey=m4rq7k2e8l7pgp4hws0fcniw2&dl=0

Generalnie cały teren jest poobstawiany zaporami i zakazami różnego rodzaju. Część terenu jest już pod wodą, zaznaczyłęm tyle ile widziałem, ale to na pewno nie wszystko, co jest zalane. Byłem tylko przejazdem, nie miałem czasu dokładnie sprawdzić, wypadałoby się tam wybrać specjalnie w tym celu.
englu (2024-12-20 17:23:31+00:00): Dzięki za informacje.
Mashin (2024-12-19 21:17:05+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM!
Thanks for editing, but unfortunately in one case you converted a while residential road into a gate. And in another case you created a duplicate road on top of existing road.
(I went ahead and fixed those issues)

If part of a road needs to get distinct information then you can select one of its nodes, right clicking on it and then selecting 'split'.

I suggest completing the Walkthough in the help section.

Also as a side note. Making road private acces is only possible when there is a gate or no trespassing sign.

Cheers
Grégoire Seux (2024-12-19 16:51:54+00:00): I've also edited name of Rue Pierre Brossolette (which was incorrectly named rue Brossolette)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-12-31 12:28:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 160830549 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some apparently nonsensical changes by related accounts.  No replies to changeset discussion comments
redd (2024-12-19 17:10:24+00:00): 

Ergänzung zum Änderungssatz: Baustellenarbeiten in Zeppelinstraße am Abschluss. Da die Oberfläche neu gemacht wurde, haben ich diese zur Neuerfassung (z.B. mittels StreetComplete) gelöscht.
redd (2024-12-19 17:10:10+00:00): Ergänzung zum Änderungssatz: Baustellenarbeiten in Zeppelinstraße am Abschluss. Da die Oberfläche neu gemacht wurde, haben ich diese zur Neuerfassung (z.B. mittels StreetComplete) gelöscht.
redd (2024-12-19 17:09:13+00:00): Ergänzung zum Änderungssatz: Baustellenarbeiten in Zeppelinstraße am Abschluss. Da alle Straßenmarkierungen entfernt wurde, habe ich diese zur Neuerfassung (z.B. mittels StreetComplete) gelöscht. Ebenso die Oberflächenbeschaffenheit, da hier neue Asphaltarbeiten stattgefunden haben
intschutschuna (2025-01-04 18:32:36+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1327642441 hat noch ein construction=yes. Sollte das dann auch weg?
redd (2025-01-04 18:55:13+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. Habe es entfernt, die Bauarbeiten in dem Abschnitt sind fast vollständig abgeschlossen
redd (2024-12-19 17:09:03+00:00): Ergänzung zum Änderungssatz: Baustellenarbeiten in Zeppelinstraße am Abschluss. Da alle Straßenmarkierungen entfernt wurde, habe ich diese zur Neuerfassung (z.B. mittels StreetComplete) gelöscht. Ebenso die Oberflächenbeschaffenheit, da hier neue Asphaltarbeiten stattgefunden haben
redd (2024-12-19 17:08:37+00:00): Ergänzung zum Änderungssatz: Baustellenarbeiten in Zeppelinstraße am Abschluss. Da alle Straßenmarkierungen entfernt wurde, habe ich diese zur Neuerfassung (z.B. mittels StreetComplete) gelöscht. Ebenso die Oberflächenbeschaffenheit, da hier neue Asphaltarbeiten stattgefunden haben
redd (2024-12-19 17:08:28+00:00): Ergänzung zum Änderungssatz: Baustellenarbeiten in Zeppelinstraße am Abschluss. Da alle Straßenmarkierungen entfernt wurde, habe ich diese zur Neuerfassung (z.B. mittels StreetComplete) gelöscht. Ebenso die Oberflächenbeschaffenheit, da hier neue Asphaltarbeiten stattgefunden haben
redd (2024-12-19 17:08:21+00:00): Ergänzung zum Änderungssatz: Baustellenarbeiten in Zeppelinstraße am Abschluss. Da alle Straßenmarkierungen entfernt wurde, habe ich diese zur Neuerfassung (z.B. mittels StreetComplete) gelöscht. Ebenso die Oberflächenbeschaffenheit, da hier neue Asphaltarbeiten stattgefunden haben
redd (2024-12-19 17:07:54+00:00): Ergänzung zum Änderungssatz: Baustellenarbeiten in Zeppelinstraße am Abschluss. Da alle Straßenmarkierungen entfernt wurde, habe ich diese zur Neuerfassung (z.B. mittels StreetComplete) gelöscht. Ebenso die Oberflächenbeschaffenheit, da hier neue Asphaltarbeiten stattgefunden haben
vtrtsxlegend (2024-12-20 15:53:44+00:00): Hi Baloo Uriza, thank you for making us aware of placement tags. We will make sure to take them into account in future edits to prevent similar situations that caused you reverting the 14 changesets
Yunan973 (2026-07-29 13:06:56+00:00): Bonjour,
je vois que tu as fait des modifications sur l'intérieur de la gare, j'en déduis que tu connais bien les lieux (je suis moi-même en Guyane, et même si je suis déjà venu à Lille, jamais mis les pieds à la gare).
Je suis tombé sur une incohérence entre cette pièce https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1167157604 et celle-ci https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1275299977 qui sont indiquées au niveau -1 donc qui sont l'une sur l'autre.

Cordialement
Yunan973 (2026-07-29 13:23:40+00:00): En complément je suis tombé sur cette pièce https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1167157605, qui semble impliquer que la pièce https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1275299977 est redondante (2 shop=ticket)
woodpeck_repair (2024-12-19 17:14:04+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 160164667, 160169019, 160169915, 160172245, 160172686, 160172856, 160204788, 160213789, 160345729, 160351219, 160398448, 160399383, 160402952.
woodpeck_repair (2024-12-19 17:15:14+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 152082342, 152247144, 154649994, 154739784, 154748278, 154886939, 154887635, 154888689, 154900523, 154931549, 154966058, 154967289, 154974830, 154976184, 154976301, 154987614, 155018470, 155136599, 155137900, 155137934, 155137998, 155562602, 155929322.
woodpeck_repair (2024-12-19 17:16:13+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 148286081, 148286263, 148286337, 148287763, 148288112, 148289619, 148294727, 148294915, 148334929, 148358998, 148514333, 148542357, 148544410, 148545534, 148548194, 148548341, 148549069, 148563984, 148564045, 148589381, 148589478, 148590438, 148591729, 148591990, 148631923, 148632559, 148633576, 148634992, 148697917, 148698929, 148850719, 148850869, 148851975, 148852467, 148852654, 148853846, 148960072, 148960211, 148961409, 148961705, 148968272, 148971861, 148974335, 148975398, 148978659, 149005171, 149223942, 149263120, 149263368, 149266260, 149306014, 149311403, 149311778, 149311940, 149312677, 149312909, 150073426, 150074083, 150074293, 150125899, 150130991, 150131719, 150133178, 150133397, 150133838, 150161575, 150162707, 150177892, 150179607, 150212957, 150217844, 150355375, 150356155, 150381616, 150383495, 150383862, 150432672, 150455298.
multimodaal (2024-12-29 00:06:56+00:00): Hi, I have a some questions about the rationale and proportionality of the massive reverts that are performed and the associated user block 16996).  Please see 
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/niet-meer-bestaande-railways-mappen/122686/36
Thx
Baloo Uriza (2024-12-19 17:42:41+00:00): Hey, could you slow down and revisit your work on your last 9 changesets?  Just glancing at this it looks like you've simply just hit add on everything without adjusting to fit at all.  These shapes need to fit the buildings they correspond to.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160404316
rechlin (2024-12-19 18:54:49+00:00): I'm only accepting the ones that are very close to the actual footprints; I'm skipping or manually editing the ones that aren't very close.  Some are missing protrusions of a few feet but overall the AI did well here; in this area the lack of trees makes them pretty good so I can go through them fairly quickly.  I suppose it's a matter of personal opinion whether they are "close enough".

I'll stop mapping Siloam Springs now if you want to do the rest yourself, or you can take a look at the ones with the with the microsoft/BuildingFootprints tag to adjust them to your liking.
HellMap (2024-12-20 12:05:37+00:00): Sveiki,

Paldies par kartes papildinājumiem!

Es visas izmaiņas pārskatīju un šur tur pielaboju. Lielu kļūdu tur nebija, tāpēc visus sīkumus te neminēšu.

Gribēju gan uzprasīt par šo teritorijas laukumu - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1144804753/history . Tu to sākotnēji izdzēsi un es atjaunoju, jo domāju, ka nejauši, bet tu to atkal izdzēsi. Jautājums - kas šeit tagad atrodas? Vai šis laukums ir nepareizs? Vai teritorijas lietošana ir cita?

Līdzīgi izdzēsta arī šī teritorija https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1235164689

Par šo stāvvietu, kuru tu iezīmēji iepriekš un es pielaboju no ortofoto, kuru tu vēlāk izdzēsi - vai te tomēr tādas nav vai kaut kas ir mainījies vai arī es nepareizi sapratu, kas te atrodas?

Vēl pieminēšu, ka tu vairākas reizes nejauši pārbīdīji adrešu punktus, droši vien kamēr redaktorā bīdot karti un nejauši aizķerot punktu nevis fonu. Es tos pārlaboju, bet ņem vērā, ka šādi var gadīties un var sanākt kaut ko aizbīdīt ne tur.

Ja kādi jautājumi, droši vaicā.

Paldies
Celotajs (2024-12-20 12:17:26+00:00): Labadiena!
Kas attiecas uz abām pieminētajām teritorijām - tās dzēsu tīri konsekvences dēļ, jo pēc tādas loģikas gandrīz jebkurš kvadrāts vai taisnstūris kas ielu norobežots Skrīveros ir Residential area. Nesapratu iemeslu kādēļ šīs divas jāizceļ īpaši.

Kas attiecas par stāvvietu kā zonu - man rāda ka vienas zonas vietā tur ir 3  atsevišķas, kas nav nepareizi - jo tas ir viens laukums ar nosacītām 3 daļām, ko sadala brauktuves.

Kas attiecas par adrešu punktiem - ņemts vērā - jo tiešām bija reizes kad paķērās ne tas ko vajag, mēģināju gan iet atpakaļ, bet laikam ne visur sanāca :( 
Paldies par modro aci!
HellMap (2024-12-20 12:50:22+00:00): Paldies par precizējumu.

Par residential teritorijām. Tās divas ir pašlaik vairāk vai mazāk pareizi iezīmētas. Te Skrīvoros lieta ir otrādi - nevis tās divas īpaši izceltas, bet visas pārējās nekur nav iezīmētas. Tādām teorētiski būtu jābūt pāri visām dzīvojamām un citām teritorijām (parasti līdzīgi kadastra izkārtojumam). Te kartētāju un laikietilpības pieejas nedaudz atšķiras, kā tieši un ko ietver tajās teritorijās - no lielas "pļekas" kā https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/536607334 līdz starp-ielu iedalījumiem kā https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/93074082 . Vienkārši Latvijā kartētāju ir maz un neviens vēl nav paspējis šajā vietā.

Par stāvvietu (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1343762480 aizmirsu linku iepriekšējā komentārā) - OSM ir divi elementi "parking lot" (stāvvietas teritorija, kas ietver atsevišķas stāvvietas vietas, piebrauktuves, celiņus, dekorācijas, utt.) un "parking space" (viena vai vairākas atsevišķās stāvvietas vietas). Un tie tiešām ir abi reizē - viens norāda teritorijas vispārējo lietošanu un otrs norāda konkrētu parkošanās ģeometriju (un tās teorētiski sadala pa vienai vietai, piemēram https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1311345579). Stāvvietā var norādīt vispārēju informāciju, piemēram maksu vai laika ierobežojumus. Individuālās vietās var norādīt specifiskas, piemēram, ka paredzēts elektrolādēšānai vai invalīdiem. Parasti vispirms iezīmē lielo stāvvietas teritoriju un tad, ja kādam vēlme, zīmē sīkāk apstāšanās vietas un visu citu, kas tur var būt.
Celotajs (2024-12-20 13:10:39+00:00): Ir skaidrs par rezidenču zonām, līdz tam man ir patālāks ceļs, izksatās pat ne visas ielas ir redzamas kartē, bet jāiet skatīties uz vietas. 
Par stāvvietu arī ir pilnīga skaidrība, paldies!
AndyB_66 (2024-12-19 19:27:26+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
Osmwithspace (2024-12-25 10:49:51+00:00): Weshalb hast du religion=christian bei den Nodes entfernt? Ich verstehe das Wiki nicht so, dass man entweder religion=* oder denomination=* taggt.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160405166
Osmwithspace (2025-01-24 20:17:38+00:00): Wenn ich bis Sonntag keine Rückmeldung habe, mache ich den Changeset rückgängig, da mir die Änderungen nicht sinnvoll erscheinen.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160405166
matze089 (2025-01-25 09:09:25+00:00): Er erscheint mir zwar nicht sinnvoll, daß überall das Symbol für Kirche erscheint, denn Andachtsstätte trifft es im Sinne genau. Soll ich das Symbol ändern und als Bescheibung Andachtsstätte Kreuzweg xx?
Osmwithspace (2025-01-25 17:03:07+00:00): Danke für deine Antwort. Ich verstehe jetzt was du meinst. Offensichtlich ist das nicht ganz optimal im ID-Editor gelöst. In diesem Changeset hast du lediglich religion=christian entfernt, was eigentlich nichts ändert...
Ich muss mal schauen und melde mich nochmal.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160405166
Osmwithspace (2025-01-25 17:59:56+00:00): Kannst du beschreiben was das genau ist? Sind das Wegkreuze, Bildstöcke, Kapellen, etc.?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160405166
matze089 (2025-01-25 20:02:46+00:00): Ich würde sagen, Bildstöcke trifft es vielleicht ganz gut. Grundfläche zwischen 0,8 bis 1 qm. Höhe ca 2,50 bis 3,00. In Erinnerung auf ca 1 mtr bis auf 2,20 Höhe auf einer Seite Aussparung für das Motiv. Soll ich evtl ein Foto machen und einstellen?
Osmwithspace (2025-01-26 10:59:55+00:00): Danke! Ich hab die Nodes zu historic=wayside_shrine geändert und religion=christian wieder ergänzt.
https://osmcha.org/changesets/161775334
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160405166
matze089 (2025-01-26 21:13:10+00:00): Gute Lösung. Danke.
Aenet (2025-01-16 02:38:37+00:00): Why are you referring to the Gwinn Unit as invisible in all your changeset comments?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160405328
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-17 02:16:15+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165051339
NorthCrab_upload (2024-12-19 19:20:58+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3575721534
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12434195899

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Krasne":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12370364373
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12434195900
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12434204201
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12434204202

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
AndyB_66 (2024-12-19 19:27:52+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
AndyB_66 (2024-12-19 19:27:59+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
AndyB_66 (2024-12-19 19:28:05+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
Dimitar155 (2024-12-19 19:22:41+00:00): Заявката за преглед е заради кръстовището при node/12434215521 не ми харесва как се получи. Също не съм сигурен как точно би било най-добре да се начертае.
Fraxi (2024-12-19 22:34:26+00:00): Можеш да пробваш автоматичното начертаване чрез този JOSM плъгин - https://github.com/tsmock/sidewalks/. Първоначално без да качваш промените и с проверка.
Dimitar155 (2024-12-20 07:20:34+00:00): Проблема не е пътеката, а кръстовището между трите улици. Ако го начертая както е реално се получава "тройно" кръстовище с триъгълник между тях, а ако го направя в един възел няма да има нищо общо с реалната ситуация.
gscholz (2024-12-21 09:25:07+00:00): Hi VLD291,
this changeset has created several errors regarding self intersecting lines and displaced ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=9.11169&lat=45.46459&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=160407673

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
VLD291 (2024-12-23 22:30:01+00:00): Hi gscholz,
Thank you for bringing this changeset to my attention, it is definitely causing issues not intended to. It appears that I dragged the railways without noticing and when it came time to upload, my software glitched and did not notify me of it and for that I apologize for my failure to notice such a major mistake.
Given that the original intentions of the changeset was no more than adding crossing nodes on a cycleway, I believe that the quickest fix will be to revert the changeset and then re-add the crossing nodes without the dragging of the railways. Here is the revert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160555943. Once again, thank you for bringing this up so I could fix it.
Best regards, 
Emilio.
Glassman (2024-12-20 19:42:42+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160407705
AndyB_66 (2024-12-19 19:28:35+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
NorthCrab_upload (2024-12-19 19:31:16+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Chociule":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1175553643
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1343857836
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1343857837
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1343857839

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2024-12-19 19:41:01+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Borowy Młyn":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12434250628
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12434250629
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1093680350

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Baloo Uriza (2024-12-19 20:38:09+00:00): This one might need another shot at it since this appears to have been accidentally joined to the cycleway's centerline.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160407951
Glassman (2024-12-20 19:46:09+00:00): Please don't vandalize OSM. Your edit has been removed.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160408106
gscholz (2024-12-21 08:56:56+00:00): Hi Empanada_Mapillary,
this changeset has created several errors regarding self intersecting and overlapping ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-76.43509&lat=3.68654&zoom=18&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-76.43525&lat=3.68663&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=160408418

As you may know, this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps. Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
opendcc (2025-01-21 04:38:20+00:00): Die Straße nach Schrottwinkl ist ab Bahn nicht asphaltiert.
CurlingMan13 (2025-01-13 10:17:24+00:00): What spurce did you use?
olvova (2024-12-22 21:03:02+00:00): 👍👍👍
NieWnen (2024-12-20 10:12:24+00:00): Dzięki za te zmiany!
Dawid2849 (2024-12-20 11:03:00+00:00): Dziękuję! 🫶
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2024-12-20 20:27:53+00:00): Hi, there is no concrete rule. You could either decide that you want the default as maxspeed and since the sign is conditional to have conditional:maxspeed. Or you could put maxspeed as 70 and add a conditional for 90 - at least this won't suggest to break the law for consumers which don't support conditionals.

If it was a condition which is applied rarely, I'd definitely put it in conditional:maxspeed.

You should at least add the default speed (90?) as maxspeed if you leave the conditional as 70.

I also suggest removing ;Sa off;Su off - I think these are not required.

Some context if someone stumbles upon these comments:

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=58.18305939999698&lng=25.50511080000001&z=18.531688264196713&pKey=293992547065552&focus=photo&x=0.5808639655721334&y=0.47141229429312625&zoom=2.0930232558139537
zstadler (2025-04-25 15:50:42+00:00): היי,
של מי סימוני השבילים בכחול ובצהוב שהוספת בעריכה הזו? קק"ל? חלה"ט?

אני שואל כי אין להם יחסים ולא ברור מה צריכים להיות ה osmc:symbol וה- operator של היחסים
Harel M (2025-04-25 15:59:47+00:00): של פארק הירדן, אם אני לא טועה זה קק"ל:
https://www.parkyarden.co.il/

זה בטוח לא של החל"ט.
bxl-forever (2024-12-20 09:17:10+00:00): Hello,

The address in automatically computed from the container building (street and house number)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/142694409

And the postcode and municipality is automatically computed by the existing areas.

This is the reason why in most cases this information should never be duplicated on shops themselves.
Daan Vanderveken (2024-12-20 18:24:11+00:00): Hello,

thank you for your feedback.

I will correct the duplicated information.

I will delete all addr: key/value pairs (addr:city, addr:housenumber, ...) =
from Apotheek Kinget.

Is that the good approach for correction?
bxl-forever (2024-12-20 20:43:33+00:00): Yes, removing the 5 addr:* tags from the node is the best option.
ilias_ (2024-12-20 17:55:51+00:00): Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
saunter (2024-12-20 18:45:37+00:00): Thanks ilias, I will make sure to do only local changes
db-ak (2024-12-21 17:11:07+00:00): Jaka jest taktyka tagowania nielegalnych przejść przez tory, np tutaj: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/988290468
Dać jakiś crossing=no, access=no? Ja miałem plan by w miejscu torowiska nie tworzyć ścieżi. Kończyła by się po obu stronach bez połączenia by kogoś nie zmylić że jest tam przejazd, a ląduje pod pociągiem 160km/h lub na pana SOKistę
Yog Sot (2024-12-21 21:10:54+00:00): tysiąc razem przechodziłem czy nawet przejeżdżałem przez nieoznakowany przejazd i nikt nigdy nie robi wątów. Raz tylko przeszedłem obok zamknietego szlabanu, to jacyś robotnicy chcieli mnie legitymować. 

A co do mapowania, na węzłach dajesz np access=permit
Inni dają =no
a jeszcze inni kasują, tak jak ty to zrobiłeś ostatnio obok ;d
No ale nawet na poligonie są drogi mimo, ze jest zakaz wstępu. Generalnie nie kasuje się czegoś co jest. 
Ludzie sami podejmują wybór, czy chcą jechać nieformalną ścieżką i przechodzić nielegalnie przez tory, czy jednak wola objazd. 

Wiesz, nie będe miał żalu, ale zmapowałem, bo widać na fotomapie, ze ludzie przechodzą i na zbadanym ruchu pieszym czy rowerowym też widać. 
Tam gdzie skasowałeś to zbadany ruch był znikomy.
literan (2024-12-22 12:44:00+00:00): а зачем тег кафе удалять?
zuicz (2025-01-27 09:04:52+00:00): Dlaczego ta droga awansowała na secondary?