piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Patr1k_P (2024-05-28 18:59:25+00:00): tento užívateľ je pravdepodobne bývalý infitter, ktorý bol zablokovaný.. aspoň sa to podobá na oblasť v ktorej mapuje + ignoracia či už komentáre, alebo upozornenie na jednotlivé chyby, pretože si ďalej robí po svojom
Filip009 (2024-05-28 19:49:05+00:00): Hej viem, preto som mu to napísal ostrejšie a keď spraví najbližšie edit, tak na základe úprav bude písať na dwg
silversurfer83 (2024-05-24 08:40:15+00:00): Moin Werner :)

guck mal im WIki nach der Unterscheidung zwischen grave_yard (war hier an der Stelle ursprünglich eingetragen) und cemetery (hast du gesetzt):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:landuse%3Dcemetery
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dgrave_yard

cheers
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151729456
Michael Jostmeyer (Josi) (2024-12-03 07:17:52+00:00): Die Geschwindigkeit hier stimmt nicht. Eingetragen ist 50, erlaubt sind aber 100
linux-user (2024-12-03 08:05:58+00:00): Du darfst  die Geschwindigkeit natürlich ändern. Ich hatte nur die temporäre Baustelle eingetragen, (access:conditional) die natürlich auch wieder entfernt werden kann.
xephos1one (2024-05-31 12:09:41+00:00): Du wolltest ein Review hierzu (kann natürlich nur das reviewen, wo ich im Thema drin bin):
Punk 1 der mir auffällt: Grundstückszufahrten sind keine parking_aisle sondern service=driveway - auch wenn es dann dort zum Parken genutzt wird (z.B. way/1286000028).
service=parking_aisle sind nur die Parkplatzzufahrten auf einem großen Parkplatz.
Punkt 2: Wenn du Gehwege separat mappst, vergiss nicht, die passendste Variante hiervon der Straße hinzuzufügen (habe ich leider auch zu oft vergessen):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:sidewalk%3Dseparate
redd (2025-02-13 16:01:42+00:00): Hi David,
vielen Dank für den Eintrag deines Geschäfts in OpenStreetMap. Ich finde es toll, wenn Geschäftsinhaber selber ihre Geschäfte eintragen.

Die etwas werbehafte Beschreibung ist nicht notwendig bzw. nicht erwünscht in OpenStreetMap und habe ich daher entfernt. 

Weiterhin sollte auf personenbezogene Daten verzichtet werden. Daher habe ich den operator Tag entfernt. 

Weiterhin habe ich aus die Stockwerkangabe auf level=0 korrigiert, da level=* für maschinenlesbare Zahlen vorbehalten sein soll.

Vielen Dank und Grüße,

redd
eggie (2024-05-23 15:58:44+00:00): reverted by changeset #151730832
eggie (2024-05-23 16:00:04+00:00): I added access=private according your information.
Greetz
eggie
EneaSuper (2024-05-24 11:02:20+00:00): Ciao camminatoreseriale, per caso qui è presente un attraversamento pedonale?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1286003340
camminatoreseriale (2024-05-24 13:40:24+00:00): Nop, però è connesso con la via (per essere ultraprecisi potremmo dire la corsia -lane- di sinistra)
EneaSuper (2024-05-24 13:44:41+00:00): Ok, ma c'è tipo uno scivolo o simili? (dovrei verificare sul posto...).
camminatoreseriale (2024-05-24 16:56:23+00:00): No, non c’è proprio, ci sono anzi due pali con catenella solo lì, immagino proprio per evitare l’attraversamento (o forse il parcheggio?). Tra l’altro se ti capita di passarci sarebbe da rivedere in che condizioni è la parte sovrastante, l’ultima volta che ci sono passato pochi mesi fa era camminabile senza problemi ma stava un po’ franando tutto nel torrente (coi soliti utilissimi cartelli di attenzione)… è anche illuminata, se non ricordo male (con qualche palo spento), ma con tutte ‘ste strade e stradine che faccio potrei confondermi 😊
EneaSuper (2024-05-24 18:33:15+00:00): Capisco, nel mentre mi sono permesso di apportare le modifiche alla zona in oggetto come mostrato a questo link:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/history#map=16/44.4734/8.9092
camminatoreseriale (2024-05-24 20:51:34+00:00): Quando si tratta di interventi miei o nei quali ho avuto a che fare io modifica sempre pure senza avvertire figurati 😊 
Dovevamo ancora riflettere sulla questione dei marciapiedi fra l’altro… mi viene in mente ora, ma non ricordo dove ne avevamo parlato…
Il fatto che io li avessi iniziati a inserire senza sapere che esisteva un tag specifico da aggiungere semplicemente alla strada e poi la cosa si sia diffusa nell’area genovese in modo un pò assurdo tipograficamente parlando…
EneaSuper (2024-05-25 09:02:58+00:00): I marciapiedi, per ragioni di routing e completismo diciamo, andrebbero mappati nel modo in cui li ho mappati io e li hanno mappati altri utenti nel resto della città.

Più precisamente per completismo intendo dire che, mappando un marciapiede nel modo di cui sopra, si ha la possibilità di aggiungere tutta una serie di metadati agli elementi che lo compongono che permettono di avere delle informazioni chiare e complete, oltre che favorire il routing in maniera corretta come già detto, soprattutto quello legato agli attraversamenti pedonali.
Naturalmente, usando il tag specifico sulla way di una strada (come Via Mercati Generali) tutto questo insieme di dati e informazioni non può essere aggiunto come si deve.

Spero di essere stato chiaro 😊
camminatoreseriale (2024-05-25 19:10:28+00:00): È vero solo nei rarissimi casi in cui il marciapiede non permette attraversamenti ed è l’unica connessione con intersezioni laterali. Ma questo evento è molto raro: si verifica solo in caso di strade a grande scorrimento. In quel caso va bene, ed è utile, negli altri no. Io stesso sbagliavo, come dicevo, ma poi ho letto. La “rule of thumb” di OSM è che la mappatura rispecchi in modo concreto, corretto e comprensibile lo stato dei fatti, non che vi sia una precisione architettonica non utile ai fini dello scopo del progetto (che è appunto generare una mappa, non un piano catastale). Una mappatura dei sidewalk così è deprecata perché, al contrario, genera un rendering sovrabbondante e confuso (stessa ragione per cui le highway vanno indicate separate SOLO quando c’è un divisorio fisico fra le due, non basta la doppia linea continua). Se hai qualche linea guida o discussione sul wiki di Osm che dica diversamente linkami pure, perché come ti dicevo mi risulta l’esatto contrario.
In generale, ricordiamoci sempre che, proprio per ragioni di mappatura, tutti gli elementi highway devono essere raggiunti dal sistema generale delle strade, sempre, anche se in spazi chiusi o privati.
EneaSuper (2024-05-25 19:34:18+00:00): Chiaro chiaro, è un argomento molto interessante ma ti dirò, più di quanto ti ho detto io precedentemente non so cos'altro aggiungere, ma nel gruppo nazionale di Telegram la questione due o tre volte è saltata fuori, e si era deciso di mappare come faccio io per intenderci.

Se vuoi ti faccio entrare, mi farebbe piacere averti tra noi, fammi sapere 🙂
ivanbranco (2024-05-25 22:01:20+00:00): >> Una mappatura dei sidewalk così è deprecata

Deprecata da chi? Mappare i marciapiedi a parte permette un maggior dettaglio, secondo me non é mai raccomandabile cancellare qualcosa per sostituirlo con qualcos'altro di dettaglio minore.
camminatoreseriale (2024-05-25 22:57:11+00:00): @eneasuper volentierissimo, ti giro il num in privato? 👍🏻

@ivanbranco hai ragione, il termine deprecato è improprio, sul tema ci sono decine (forse centinaia) di discussioni e un consenso definitivo in realtà non si è mai avuto, perciò si tende a rimettere la scelta ai capitoli nazionali/locali (tanto per linkarne una https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/pedestrian-lane-on-the-road/97086). L’ideale sarebbe darsi una linea di indirizzo generale almeno fra i più attivi e seguirla. Senza imposizioni ovviamente, questa è una delle belle cose delle politiche di OSM. Sul non cancellare è generalmente verissimo (se volete farlo voi due sui miei edit non ho problemi perché vi ho visto agire e so che sono edit migliorativi), e quella è una vera e propria base di osm (un po’ come il “assume good faith” su wikipedia), ovviamente c ‘è caso e caso. Ci sono alcuni errori gravi (come l’uso del “designed” su alcune highway o l’uso dell’access “no” al posto di “private” o l’uso di piste ciclabili in sentieri che sono accessibilissimi ai pedoni, o l’uso di elementi che devono essere mappati come point e non aree), errori che vengono commessi abbastanza spesso sulle alture liguri e su cui è importante agire, perché semplicemente rendono inutilizzabile la mappa (e questa è proprio una delle good practice di base di Osm https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice). Insomma, un conto sono gli errori e i warning, un conto sono le scelte su cosa è più efficace in un dato territorio, ovviamente, hai ragione e sono d’accordo 😊 sarebbe da parlarne un po’ insieme. Per dire: nei vicoli indicare il marciapiede, che a volte c’è, sarebbe ‘na mezza follia imho ;-)
eggie (2024-05-23 15:57:26+00:00): reverted by changeset #151730757
eggie (2024-05-23 16:20:24+00:00): A cycle_barrier would'nt stop a bicycle.
It's placed for safety. It has nothing to do with 'bicycles are not allowed'.
This path will route for bicycles.
In Dutch it's called slingerhek. 
Gr eggie
Ken Woods (2024-05-23 17:19:34+00:00): Ik spreek nederlands. I am assuming that we are to communicate in English here.  

There is no longer a barrier of any type. 
Do you require a picture in order to stop reverting my changes?
eggie (2024-05-23 17:37:07+00:00): Om te beginnen is de parkeerstrook gemapt door mijzelf twee jaar geleden.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/112774652

Degene die iets verwijdert ben jij zelf.
Je  verwijdert dus een edit van mij.
Dat het slingerhekje er niet meer is zou goed kunnen. Het kan dan weg. 
Mijn vraag was welk bord staat vooraan dat pad?
G11, G13 G12a
Geen bord .. dan geen fietspad, maar highway=path. Routeert ook voor fietsers. 

Het pad was oorspronkelijk gemapt door mij zelf.
Zie https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/112774321
Ik verwijderd helemaal niets. 
Het is zaak voor de juiste routering dat het goed routeert.
Wanneer jij zegt. Dit is een fietspad want er staat een bord fietspad , dan is het een fietspad. 
Je hoeft geen foto's aan te leveren. We gaan ervan uit dat iedereen het goed bedoelt.


OSM is een gezamenlijk project om de beste kaart te maken.
Maar.......
Je kunt dan toch gewoon antwoord geven op een redelijke vraag. Welk bord staat hier?
Een parkeerstrook hoeft niet van de kaart omdat het prive zou zijn. 

MVG
eggie
Ken Woods (2024-05-23 17:58:43+00:00): There is no sign.
eggie (2024-05-23 18:03:43+00:00): Oke... in that case we use highway=path
.. foot=yes  bicycle=yes
Thanks for your information.
eggie
Ken Woods (2024-05-23 18:05:17+00:00): Foot traffic is routed to an adjacent path.  So, flagging this as foot=yes is inappropriate.
eggie (2024-05-23 18:19:51+00:00): In case there is a parallel footway we tag
..sidewalk=right or left
..foot=no will stop routing.
See also the Meerlaan.
The sidewalk is embedded in the cycleway with sidewalk=right en on the mainroad with sidewalk=both.
Đuro Jiří (2024-05-23 20:04:34+00:00): Ecco la foto https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4261153#map=19/45.14616/10.78382&layers=N
ivanbranco (2024-06-07 19:33:58+00:00): Hi based_kronberger, thanks for your contributions!

I noticed a couple things:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/175334415
here you did add the address to the building outline, but it was already present in the proper building relation: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2342359

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1102636555
same here, you added the address to the outer way instead that to the relation, this edit also created a duplicated building

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/369730250
here you duplicated the address to a building:part. You also added the tag building, but an element can't be a part of a building and a building at the same time

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/175108137
here you changed addr:street from "Sheshi Skënderbej" to "Rruga Sheshi Skenderbej", but there's no element with such name in the database as far as I know
you also changed building=office to building=yes. Usually a value should changed from a generic one to a more specific one, not the opposite.
Mister Kanister (2024-05-26 12:17:04+00:00): Liebes rokas-Team,

ich würde euch bitten, wie hier in Lugano und auch andernorts, z.B. Bernex (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/948625334) die Bahn-/Bussteige (public_transport=platform) nicht zu halbieren, um die verschiedenen Haltekanten abzubilden. Es handelt sich um einen Bahnsteig (bzw. Busse), dessen *Haltekanten* unterschiedliche Referenz-Buchstaben haben (ich gehe davon aus, um die korrekte Abbildung dieser Bezeichnungen geht es hier).

Um darzustellen, dass eine Kante einer platform eine andere Bezeichnung hat als die andere Kante *derselben* platform, gibt es zum Beispiel das Tag "railway=platform_edge" in Kombination mit ref=*

Siehe zum Beispiel hier: Gleis 2 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1280041308 und Gleis 3 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1280041309 sowie für den gesamten Bahnsteig https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/90690919

Dokumentation im Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:railway=platform%20edge?uselang=de

Bisherige Verwendung in CH: https://osm.li/ENY

Beste Grüsse
Moritz
frosm (2024-09-22 14:52:34+00:00): un distributeur de billet à cet endroit ? je pense que vous n'avez pas ciblé le bon endroit
renauda (2024-09-22 15:13:24+00:00): Aussi surprenant que cela puisse paraître il y avait bien un distributeur Loomis à cet endroit en mai 2024. J'ai oublié de prendre une photo de l'endroit et de mon ticket et je ne trouve aucune trace de ce distributeur sur internet. Je suis sûr que c'est le bon endroit mais je comprendrai qu'en absence de preuve il soit supprimé. Cdt. Renaud
frosm (2024-09-26 07:51:23+00:00): non je ne l'effacerai pas mais cela m'a paru tellement surprenant
renauda (2024-09-26 08:47:25+00:00): J'ai envoyé un email à la mairie de Lumio pour confirmer mais aucune réponse pour l'instant :/
renauda (2024-10-03 08:03:21+00:00): j'ai retrouvé mon ticket de retrait si jamais ça peut servir :D
(et aucune réponse de la mairie pour l'instant...)
gscholz (2024-05-31 09:22:01+00:00): Hi marial1mma,
your recent changesets have created a lot of errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-49.06179&lat=-22.34206&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=151730980

As you may know, this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps.

Can you please fix this?

You may also like to educate yourself about how to map cycleways properly, which are a part of a road:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway

Kind regards
Guido
Dodko (2024-05-24 11:54:38+00:00): Je tam prameň, vrt, alebo postavená vodáreň?
Dodko (2024-05-24 11:49:35+00:00): Podzemný vodojem má mať značku
man_made=reservoir_covered
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dreservoir_covered
Dodko (2024-05-24 19:45:12+00:00): Adresu a značku budovy netreba vymazať z budovy.
LudovicG (2024-11-23 17:20:11+00:00): reBonjour,
De même, je ne comprends pas l'ajout d'un department_store Auchan alors qu'il s'agit d'un shop=mall déjà sur OSM (node 11703811076).
Pour le Zenith, le tag events_venue sur le wiki ne semble pas correspondre (logements, mariages ...)
joost schouppe (2024-05-24 08:22:24+00:00): Je edit wordt in vraag gesteld door https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4261204
De opmerking lijkt me terecht?
Kogacarlo (2024-05-24 13:08:17+00:00): Draai dit maar terug, die tussen-s is niet nodig. Please revert; the s is not necessary.
lipuma (2024-09-12 10:47:21+00:00): De naamswijziging is nog niet teruggedraaid
Kogacarlo (2024-09-12 11:55:37+00:00): Ik heb de s weggehaald.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-06 17:17:14+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11928807485/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
GovernorKeagan (2024-05-23 16:25:37+00:00): https://keepright.at/report_map.php?schema=86&error=152574404
ivanbranco (2024-08-27 07:15:26+00:00): Hi rimugu,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11928819266/history

what is this place exactly?
ivanbranco (2024-08-27 07:17:07+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11555189891

this one also
MxxCon (2024-05-26 05:12:51+00:00): Hello.
Why did you change the name tag to alt_name?
A feature can't have alt_name without the primary name tag.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151732480
BubbaJuice (2024-05-26 05:22:14+00:00): I changed the name tag to alt_name because the bolt has no real name (that I know of I haven't looked into the actual descriptions of the survey), this is simply a nickname that has been associated with the bolt (this I am confident of). Perhaps loc_name is a better fit.
MxxCon (2024-05-26 05:26:27+00:00): You could do loc_name here.
BubbaJuice (2024-05-26 23:18:26+00:00): Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151872645
Glassman (2024-05-25 18:27:15+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151732519
EneaSuper (2024-05-24 09:25:54+00:00): Ciao, io personalmente avrei fatto così:

Avrei scritto name=Museo Certosa di Genova e short_name=MUCE o MuCe (come riportato su Genova24).

Fammi sapere cosa ne pensi 🙂
mascalzone67 (2024-05-24 10:02:14+00:00): Ciao. Ottima soluzione. Per quanto riguarda l’acronimo ho replicato quanto si trova sul sito ufficiale: MUCE. Ovviamente procedi come credi. Ciao.
EneaSuper (2024-05-24 10:55:47+00:00): Ecco fatto, grazie della collaborazione:

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=151763113
mcliquid (2024-05-24 05:22:23+00:00): Hi Swissplay and thank you for your contribution!

Please note for the future: changesets should be local.

In your case with StreetComplete: Upload more often :)

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
dpolovinkin (2025-07-03 14:32:45+00:00): спасибо за контрибьюшн в OSM! :) поправлю геометрию этого здания и тех что рядом немного)
NeisBot (2024-05-23 16:50:03+00:00): Hi Aoi333, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/495419010

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-23 19:09:11+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/151739533
user_8655426 (2024-05-24 09:40:04+00:00): Aoi333さん、こんにちは。OpenStreetMap (OSM) へようこそ。
OSM は現実の世界に存在する地物をマッピングし、正確で最新の地図をつくっていくプロジェクトです。(real and current) また、OSMの地図データはゲームだけでなく、さまざまなアプリやウェブサイトなどで使用されています。

OSMに架空の地物を追加したり、既存のデータを実際とは異なるものに変更したりしないでください。よろしくお願いします。(事実と異なる不正な編集を行ったユーザーは、ブロックされる可能性があります。)

・「ようこそ！」
https://www.openstreetmap.org/welcome

・JA:破壊行為
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:破壊行為

・Beware of fake beaches (Pokémon Go) (偽のビーチに注意してください。)
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/beware-of-fake-beaches-pokemon-go/112413

・新規マッパーに、コミュニティメンバーからお願いしたいこと
https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2018/06/12/tips-pokemon-go-2/?lang=ja

---

・JA:初心者ガイド
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:初心者ガイド

・learnOSM (ビギナーズガイド)
https://learnosm.org/ja/beginner/

・JA:Map Features (地物)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Map_Features
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151732900
RedGreenBlue09 (2024-05-23 16:53:34+00:00): Source: https://sokhdt.baria-vungtau.gov.vn/article?item=0480ecddf188ef4e75d716ec23429e59
somehundred (2024-05-24 12:48:20+00:00): Hey, Markalex. As a result of your edit, all the Depozīta punkts recycling centres are now hidden from the map as amenity=vending_machine doesn't have rendering currently.  Previously they could be identified by the recycling symbol '♻️' with name Depozīta punkts. 

Also, it's true that some of these elements are indeed vending machines inside a building but many others are individual buildings with sole purpose of recycling. This means that recycling_type=centre would be more accurate tag for them. 

Why are you not happy with 'recycling_type=centre' tagging?
markalex- (2024-05-24 14:41:51+00:00): I based my understanding on this wiki page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Drecycling#Recycling_type:
> `amenity=vending_machine` + `vending=bottle_return` for all machines that accept bottles, cans and crates which return.
and considered ambiguous tagging as undesired.

I see that I might be wrong here. Please consider joining discussion here: https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/358602-general/topic/depoz.C4.ABta.20punkti and help us get to a consensus.
Dodko (2024-05-24 11:53:17+00:00): Email je v nesprávnom poli, už tam existovala budova mali ste len doplniť značky alebo vytvoriť nový bod s vinárstvom a nie dávať novú budovu cez budovu a ešte s nesprávnou adresou.
Frans S (2024-06-07 14:09:25+00:00): Hallo Jan. Bedankt voor het mappen.
Controleer of een object een schaduw laat zien. Zo niet, geen gebouw.
Je hebt wel meer stukken grond als een gebouw gemapt,
Vriendelijk groeten
Azharul Islam Anik (2024-05-28 17:02:00+00:00): Thanks for your contribution. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151734173
Filip009 (2024-05-24 20:25:40+00:00): Ten kanál sa križuje s hlavnou cestou úrovňovo, keďže ste tam pridal brod?
RedAuburn (2024-05-23 22:51:26+00:00): It's better to use the lifecycle tagging scheme, so this would still retain the tags `was:name=WHSmith + disused:shop=newsagent`, that way it's easy to query/display what the shop used to be :)

see https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
TheUKHighStreet (2024-05-24 14:31:47+00:00): Thanks - when I started tagging I asked which was preferred, old_name or was:name and I was told that using either would be fine so I've chosen to use old_name. This page seems to say that most people prefer old_name over was:name:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:old_name
map per (2024-05-23 19:53:51+00:00): Hello Bratananio,

I reviewed this changeset:
The plant_nursery you added doesn't appear to match the definition in the OSM Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:landuse=plant%20nursery?uselang=de). The trees there are most probably not sold after a few years, but are supposed to stay there, as the "name" reflorestação implies.
Moreover the name "reflorestação" is not a name, but a description.

I would therefore suggest to replace name=reflorestação with description=reflorestação. Additionally please remove landuse=plant_nursery and replace it e.g. with natural=wood or natural=scrub (depending on the size of the trees / bushes)

Thank you and best regards
map per
Bratananio (2024-05-24 08:20:50+00:00): These trees are mostly new planted and so I cannot suggest, how long they will grow and where the limit is between panted_nursery and a little wood.
So I prefer to remain in my prescription. Perhaps later, in a few years, on can see, whether it became a wood or a bushland.
Best regands
B.
Bratananio (2024-05-24 08:25:25+00:00): Now I changed ist in one field. Perhaps it is the better way? I will see, how it looks like on the map. Then I decide to use it in the same way in future.
Best regards
B.