piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2024-05-16 06:54:24+00:00): Voorlopig de bakker weer verwijderd met 
Wijzigingenset #151392226

Ik zie hier geen bakkerij met een bezoekadres.
Welk adres, openingstijden? 
Het kan na reactie altijd weer teruggedraaid worden.
MVG
eggie
bicyclett (2025-01-05 10:57:39+00:00): Hi,
die Radfreigabe existiert offenbar schon. Allerdings nur in die eine Richtung. 
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&pKey=764164952495402&lat=52.7818455&lng=13.444579&z=17&x=0.004755097787200846&y=0.5858472450304489&zoom=0

Ich gehe stark davon aus, dass es eigentlich so gedacht ist, dass der Weg für Radverkehr in beiden Richtungen genutzt werden sollte, da aber leider das Schild westwärts fehlt, habe ich oneway=yes gesetzt.
WWMapper101 (2024-07-06 10:41:43+00:00): Hi! You seem to have (un)intentionally changed the `name` tag of Andorra to "Principat d'Andorra", which is incorrect. Do you have any reason for this change, or was it unintentional?
Frans S (2024-06-08 09:36:52+00:00): Added building tags
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151371231
richlv (2025-03-29 19:33:53+00:00): Couldn't spot anything for skateboarding at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1283332715 , only two smallish playgrounds. I there something for skateboarding nearby?
HellMap (2025-03-29 19:48:36+00:00): I do not remember exactly why I added it. There was nothing mapped here before and I was mostly fixing another user's edit, so I must have assumed it was one from aerial. Since I haven't surveyed this in a very long time, I was probably misremembering the area. So feel free to adjust anything and delete the area.
richlv (2025-03-29 20:06:27+00:00): Neat, thank you for the clarification.
MxxCon (2024-05-16 03:12:30+00:00): Perhaps it's also worth to add architect:wikidata=Q47090636 tag to more accurately identify which Charles B. Meyers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151371653
MxxCon (2024-05-16 03:14:05+00:00): Hello.
Is "Old Bellevue Psychiatric Hospital Building" an official name of this building or something you came up with to describe it?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151372221
Ostermond (2024-05-16 03:20:43+00:00): It is the Bellevue Psychiatric Hospital Building (formerly the Bellevue Psychopathic Hospital when it was established in the 1930s). However, all psychiatric healthcare operations ended when this building closed as a hospital in the 1980s. All psychiatric care is performed on the main Bellevue campus, so "Old" is a bit of a choice on my part -- but it is an accurate descriptor.
I believe it's used as a homeless shelter today.
If you think it should be changed from being labeled as a "hospital building", in spite of its history as such, let me know what it ought be changed to.
gion274 (2024-05-20 09:30:05+00:00): ciao andymcnab4
commento questo changeset vedendo che stai mettendo il name=numero-itinerario a diversi sentieri CAI tra l'altro già correttamente relazionati. Ti rammento che il name o il ref non va messo nei singoli tratti dell'itinerario ma solo nella relazione
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:CAI
"tutte le informazioni riportate nella tabella sotto devono essere nella relazione e non nei campi dei vari segmenti che la compongono"
ciao, gion274
andymcnab4 (2024-05-20 11:41:49+00:00): Ciao
Non ho ben compreso?
ivanbranco (2024-05-20 12:44:23+00:00): Il numero identificativo del sentiero, ad esempio "910", non va aggiunto come nome delle strade che lo compongono.
gion274 (2024-05-20 13:00:02+00:00): come dice ivanbranco
andymcnab4 (2024-05-20 13:19:02+00:00): Ok, grazie rincontrollo le modifiche, apportate
Ruslan Fatih (2024-08-20 05:08:10+00:00): Откуда информация про велодорожки?
evgeniyakz (2024-09-09 08:00:18+00:00): Трициклы ездят ?
Frans S (2024-06-08 09:35:50+00:00): Added building=yes tag to these mappings.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151372657
eggie (2024-05-15 18:37:00+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Taya_S (2024-05-15 18:45:20+00:00): Hallo dvdhoven,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4229265
Zou je ook naar dit cluster notes willen kijken? De paden zijn afgesloten, en ik kan op wandelnet ook zien dat de routes flink veranderd zijn. Ik ben zelf niet helemaal zeker over hoe ik dit allemaal zou moeten verleggen.

Groeten,
Taya
dvdhoven (2024-05-16 08:08:37+00:00): Hallo Taya,

Ik heb de routes omgelegd, kp's verplaatst, paden op disused gezet en de notes afgesloten

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
Taya_S (2024-05-16 14:56:11+00:00): Top werk!
user_12500175 (2025-03-09 16:37:13+00:00): Hallo, du hast mit dem Änderungsatz den Weg von path zu cycleway geändert.
Der Weg ist allerdings mit Zeichen 240 ausgeschildert ( kombinierter Fuß-,Radweg) deshalb stimmt path. Ein cycleway wäre mit Zeichen 237 (Radweg) ausgeschildert. Früher wurde beides gemappt heute ist highway=path dafür das bessere mapping.
Gruß
Danfost
NeisBot (2024-05-15 18:05:05+00:00): Hi Beanzzzz, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1283353463

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
NeisBot (2024-05-16 05:17:56+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151389428
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-16 05:18:02+00:00): Please don't add fake beaches to OSM!
NeisBot (2024-05-16 06:19:16+00:00): Hi Beanzzzz, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1283353945

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-16 17:01:42+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/151403890
Langlaeufer (2024-05-17 09:50:29+00:00): Dallo Wiebketru, der Radweg ist hier nicht separat eingezeichnet sondern war korrekt als lane erfasst.
Langlaeufer (2024-05-17 10:07:25+00:00): Ich meinte an der Podbi, da fehlte lane=exklusive - daher hat SC das angemarkert. Bei der Pasteurallee ist seperate richtig.
Quickflix (2024-05-15 18:11:06+00:00): Lets Discuss if needed change.
rempshaener (2024-06-24 17:28:04+00:00): Hallo,
ich habe erst nach dem Anpassen gemerkt, dass du es kürzlich geändert hattest, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/32822730. Daher zur Sicherheit: das access=destination war sicher nur ein Versehen?
Viele Grüße
Ropino (2024-06-24 20:58:45+00:00): Hallo,
Sorry, mein Versehen.
motor_vehicle=destination war gemeint.
VG
Filip009 (2024-05-18 17:45:48+00:00): Dobrý deň, pri nahrávaní zmien prosím uvádzajte aj zdroj.
orthocircular (2024-05-15 19:47:23+00:00): You mapped! Thanks for your contributions. Is this grass runway marked or made official in any way, or is it just a grass area that happens to be suitable for landing?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151375705
alexnevermaps (2024-05-15 22:16:05+00:00): This airstrip is maintained by the airport, but is not in the FAA database. Do you think I should add a tag for "maintained" ?
joel56dt (2024-05-16 02:25:33+00:00): Thanks for these additions! Please keep it up, if you can. I appreciate the new business listings.
GrumpyGorilla (2024-05-15 18:44:39+00:00): Requested review because the areas aren't connected to any footpaths. I'm not sure if I should extend the pedestrian areas until the connect or make additional footpaths branching from the main paths and connecting. Is there any preferred approach here?
eggie (2024-05-15 19:37:22+00:00): Hi   The areas don't route anyway so you may leave it this way.
Also posible is to make an additional route with highway =pedestrian into the area from Brandmeesters nr 82 and Goos to the junction Biesboschstraat. 
On our forum was a discussion the other day about this issue.
I made one example with highway=pedestrian.
Gr eggie
eggie (2024-05-15 19:38:49+00:00): My edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=151378483
NeisBot (2024-05-15 18:55:05+00:00): Hi Vanillareal, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/node/11907788569

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
NeisBot (2024-05-16 05:18:26+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151389437
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-16 05:18:32+00:00): Please don't add fake beaches to OSM!
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-16 06:12:16+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/151389437
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-16 06:12:23+00:00): Please don't add fake beaches to OSM!
Raquel Dezidério Souto (2024-07-08 00:36:45+00:00): jmsbert, what is this area?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1283365658
jmsbert (2024-07-08 20:09:21+00:00): Hello Raquel,
the way was just a temporary aid to see more easily the boarders of the task(s) while validation of the HOT project in JOSM. Normally I remove it before uploading the changes - this time I forgot to do so. I am sorry.
I have now removed the object.
Thanks for bringing this up.
eggie (2024-05-16 08:01:46+00:00): Dag T40m,
Je kunt ook een verzoek doen op het forum van OSM. Niet iedereen leest review_requests
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/nl/43

MVG
eggie
Frans S (2024-06-08 08:20:49+00:00): Here you did not tag the buildings as well.
Tags building=yes, added by another mapper.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151377659
shu0410 (2024-05-15 19:31:57+00:00): Disclaimer: This changest is not due to an operational error that resulted in an oversized
shu0410 (2024-05-15 19:34:46+00:00): Disclaimer: This changest is not due to an operational error that resulted in an oversized
Frans S (2024-06-08 09:26:13+00:00): Hello. I am reviewing all your changesets because most of them show issues which need to be solved.
Here you connected nodes of a path to an electric power line. Never do that.  
The tagging of that trace is also wrong. 
The footway tag you used is designated for paths in parks or between houses in urban areas. Not here.  Highway=path is more common in rural areas. Please consult this wiki for more understanding.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highways
You could see that on the task, where you connected your mapping to an already mapped 
path.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151378593
Frans S (2024-06-08 09:30:28+00:00): Hello. I review all your changesets due to the errors you created.
Here you connected nodes of a path, to an electric power line.  This is an error and need to be solved.
You also use the wrong tag on a path. Footway is designated as a path through parks, houses in urban (city) areas.
Here tag them as highway=path which is common on rural areas where it is too narrow for cars.
Please consult this wiki for more understanding.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151378593
bxl-forever (2024-05-15 20:02:30+00:00): Hello,

A "building" tag on a node attached to an existing building is really unusual.
The name looks like a description, I don’t think this is a valid name.

I presume the tags you want here are either "entrance=garage" or "amenity=parking_entrance".

Happy mapping.
lamacchiacosta (2024-05-16 08:25:06+00:00): Thank you.
Anonix35 (2024-05-21 18:26:04+00:00): Buongiorno,
Il nome dei tunnel è già stato scritto utilizzando il tag "tunnel:name="
Il nome dell'autostrada deve restare "Autostrade dei Fiori, anche nel tunnel
matteace (2024-05-21 19:17:18+00:00): Ciao concordo con te , ma è una discussione che abbiamo già iniziato con @eneasuper per esigenza di lavoro avevamo optato per quel tipo di rendering in modo che si vedessero sulla mappa .
matteace (2024-05-21 19:22:22+00:00): Scusa dimenticavo che sono operatore NUE 112
Anonix35 (2024-05-22 15:21:07+00:00): Cos'è il NUE 112 ?
Capisco, è vero che è un peccato non vedere il nome sulla mappa, ma questo può causare problemi al GPS perché penseranno che sia una strada nuova con un nuovo nome.
Dopotutto non sono un esperto in materia, ma è quello che ho letto.
eggie (2024-05-15 20:17:02+00:00): Lucca  Zou nog even linksboven kijken
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=151379376

Niet parking_space gebruiken, maar parking.
Een parking_space is een apart parkeervak. Die kun je evt ook intekenen met de juiste accesstags. Bv invalide-vakken. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-05-15 20:24:49+00:00): Zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking_space

Dus al die vakken kun je als je dat wil intekenen. 
De capacity kan gewoon op de parking zelf
canfe (2024-05-16 06:24:20+00:00): Non penso che la strada abbia come nome "Frazione Procaria". Quello è il nome della frazione.
Pertanto ho corretto l'indirizzo come place e tolto il nome alla strada.
Sarebbe invece interessante sapere se il nome del posto sia "Procaria" o "Frazione Procaria".
Da cartellonistica posta dal Comune è senza "Frazione".
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151379733
Bertu90 (2024-05-16 06:28:02+00:00): Buongiorno Canfe, l’indirizzo corretto è “Frazione Procaria 32” quindi ti chiedo di ripristinare quanto modificato. Ne ho dato certo visto che sto seguendo delle pratiche sui fabbricati. Grazie
canfe (2024-05-16 08:21:13+00:00): Ed è quello che ho messo però con la corretta formattazione.
Frans S (2024-06-10 12:31:31+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
You mapped a few times a yard (walled) as a building.
Look for the color of the object. If it is the same color as the ground in the neighborhood, it is mostly not a building 
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151380109
Joe Polastre (2024-06-02 04:00:35+00:00): admin_level=disputed is not a valid admin level. Can this be changed back to a valid level (it should be an integer), or omitted if no admin level should be assigned to a disputed boundary?

Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:admin_level for valid admin_level values.
NeisBot (2024-05-15 20:55:06+00:00): Hi LEADDERR, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1283391306

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
NeisBot (2024-05-16 05:19:08+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151389451
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-16 05:19:25+00:00): Please don't add fake beaches to OSM!
hasienda (2024-05-15 20:52:43+00:00): Vereinheitlichung Name auf Geibeltbad (ohne Zusatz "Pirna") für alle Objekte dieses Namens.
hasienda (2024-05-15 20:54:40+00:00): Rasenfläche mit Spielbereichen (ergänzt) ist nun Multi-Polygon-Relation eingetragen - Spielflächen ausgeschnitten
Frans S (2024-05-21 12:06:25+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Buildings connected with their nodes.
Included yards into a mapping, 
Please read this article how to map an inner courtyard
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon#iD
Buildings not squared.
Often included the shadow into a mapping



Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151380999
eggie (2024-05-16 06:42:40+00:00): Welcome to OSM

Is restaurant Yogya still present here?
Same address?

Greetz,
eggie
NorthCrab_upload (2024-05-15 21:00:28+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5560979025

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NeisBot (2024-05-16 06:17:06+00:00): Hi Kenny camaro, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1283392976

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-16 17:01:06+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/151404121
Kenny camaro (2024-05-17 14:45:24+00:00): There is sand closer to the water. Many people fish there and launch boats into the water. Let me know if there is anything else I can do to help with the changes
eggie (2024-05-16 06:44:32+00:00): Hi JalJoe
Thanks for your contribution. Please use the present addressnode to tag on.
Greetz,
eggie
MxxCon (2024-05-16 03:32:33+00:00): Hello.
As documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element it is inappropriate to tag the same information multiple times. You already tagged phone number as phone=. There's no need to also include contact:phone=.
Furthermore telephone= tag is outright wrong and must deleted.
Additionally, as documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone#Usage all phone numbers MUST include country dialing code.
These problems must be corrected, otherwise this changeset will be reverted in full.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151381704
Coinoswallet (2024-05-16 03:42:01+00:00): Hi, I removed the 2 extra phone numbers. Can you verify that it is ok now?
MxxCon (2024-05-16 03:44:53+00:00): Yes, look good. 👍
NeisBot (2024-05-15 21:40:06+00:00): Hi ToxicCaress, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1036092560

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
NeisBot (2024-05-16 05:20:19+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151389475
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-16 05:20:25+00:00): Please don't add fake beaches to OSM!
NeisBot (2024-05-15 21:40:09+00:00): Hi alanalot, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/620225957

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
NeisBot (2024-05-16 05:21:05+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151389494
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-16 05:21:34+00:00): Please don't add fake beaches to OSM!
alanalot (2024-05-16 05:51:11+00:00): The swimming area at this artificial beach has been closed and sand for the last 5 years with the owner having no plans to reopen.
I labeled it as a beach because it's a large amount of sand near a stationary body of water. 
Sorry if that's not the definition.
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-16 06:02:04+00:00): Hi alanalot, thanks for your answer and your feedback about your mapping activities!

Based on your description, we should delete the following way:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/620227440

Could you take over?

#HappyMapping
pavvv (2024-05-16 11:58:28+00:00): Proszę nie dodawać opisów obiektów do tagu name https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Nazwy#Nazwa_jest_tylko_nazw%C4%85
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/488573502
Jeśli chcesz opisać jakiś obiekt, użyj tagu description=*
maro21 (2024-05-16 16:00:01+00:00): Wycofałem. Ulica jest jednokierunkowa na czas remontu, co jest oddane w opisie.
BAYIRKASABI (2024-05-16 03:48:29+00:00): LÜTFEN IETT KURUMU ÇALIŞANLARI TARAFINDAN DÜZENLENMİŞ OLAN GARAJ HARITASINI ESKI HALINE GETIRINIZ. BU KONU HAKKINDA ŞİKAYETTE BULUNULMUSTUR. YÜZLERCE ÇALIŞANI MAĞDUR ETMEYE HAKKINIZ YOK. KIME SORUPTA HARITA DEĞİŞİKLİĞİ YAPIYORSUNUZ
TrickyFoxy (2024-05-15 22:39:41+00:00): С яндекс.картами сверяться нельзя :( Но вот с ЕГРН можно
rurseekatze (2024-07-17 16:18:29+00:00): Revertiert in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154065648. Hier ist kein Ladengeschäft erkennbar, Suche im Internet ergibt ebenfalls keine Treffer.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151383371
citrula (2024-05-15 23:09:06+00:00): you can press "Q" to square the corners of objects you draw with iD
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151383963
JosephLaCatter (2024-05-15 23:20:37+00:00): I prefer to trace the roof of buildings idk if the square makes it accurate but in the photo layer its completely inaccurate when I do it not sure if it's on purpose or not
citrula (2024-05-15 23:55:50+00:00): By "square" I mean it makes the corners all right angles, not just drawing squares. Tracing the roof is definitely preferred to drawing only squares.
JosephLaCatter (2024-05-16 02:25:15+00:00): you do have my permission to fix all the buildings and houses besides I didn't really know it was a cleanup tool to try to represent the real life building more accurately. I'll continue working on this while doing the square stuff to make sure it fits the real life version.