piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
trigpoint (2026-04-14 18:20:57+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/181336246
wolfy1339 (2025-11-15 01:34:39+00:00): The industrial zone is indeed present in many sources:

- https://toponymie.gouv.qc.ca/ct/ToposWeb/fiche.aspx?no_seq=436538
- https://www.parcsindustriels.ca/index.php/parcs-industriels/03-capitale-nationale/parcs-industriels-03/parc-industriel-copernic
- https://www.journaldequebec.com/2018/05/31/le-ikea-sera-situe-au-parc-industrielcopernic
- https://www.ville.quebec.qc.ca/gens_affaires/implantation-projets-immobiliers/projets-industriels/docs/Parcs_industriels_carte_generale_villeQuebec.pdf

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174671275
Pink Duck (2025-11-15 14:48:50+00:00): If you remember/have photo, could add post_box:type and royal_cypher tags perhaps?
SomeoneElse (2025-11-18 00:33:48+00:00): Thanks - this matches my recollection.
A remaining problem here (from well before your edit) is that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/195774187 seems to go across a wall and back, but that's entirely unrelated.
VLD322 (2025-11-20 19:12:34+00:00): I really appreciate your confirmation. Thank you for the comment and hope you have a fantastic day!
pyrog (2025-11-23 14:54:13+00:00): Le sentier des buttes est cassé aussi ici : 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1177222846#map=23/48.83931605/2.18858600&layers=V

Je corrige.

Yves
_Mathieu_ (2025-11-23 15:02:30+00:00): Oups, merci pour la correction !
literan (2025-11-15 10:36:46+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/500976730 здесь уже стоит тег госпиталя на территории. Не надо дублировать его на здании. Один объект на местности - один объект в OSM

Также, прошу вас не делать правки на четверть страны, править локально
ZAV (2025-11-15 15:33:15+00:00): Нижний случайно задел. Думал, что всё отменил, но что-то затесалось.
burrscurr (2025-12-16 19:53:35+00:00): Hallo Knechtie,

danke für deine Bearbeitung. Mir ist aufgefallen, dass du einige crossing=island-Tags hinzugefügt hast. crossing=island sollte eigentlich nicht mehr verwendet werden, weil so eigentlich unabhängige Merkmale in einen Schlüssel gepresst werden.  Stattdessen kannst du crossing:island=yes bzw. crossing:island=no verwenden. Weitere Infos findest du auf der Wiki-Seite: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:crossing:island.

Magst du die Querungspunkte mit crossing=island bitte entsprechend anpassen?

VG
burrscurr
Glassman (2025-11-15 20:14:06+00:00): We only map verifiable features. While not recommend, to add a proposed feature tag it like highway=proposed + proposed=cycleway.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174664887
Croissant98520 (2025-11-15 22:16:58+00:00): Roger that. I was experimenting to see if I could hide it, but now that I see it's all public and live,  I removed it and moved my idea over to uMap.
mavl (2025-12-09 02:43:32+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок добавляет непрямоугольное здание.
Comino (2026-01-03 13:23:17+00:00): Hi,

Can you confirm the following?
https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-data/issues/9408

Delete all BTC-tags?

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Comino
empty_child (2026-01-03 14:04:11+00:00): Hello Edwin,
From July'25 I'm not able to validate any Georgian POIs cause I left the country. Keep in mind, that I mostly cross validate data between stickers on-site and main crypto providers. 
In Alcorium it's better to clarify whether it's possible to pay via CityPay or keepz. If the answer is no that crypto payments unavailable
Comino (2026-01-03 19:44:09+00:00): Hi,

Thank you for your quick reply. Unfortunately, I can’t follow up with the person who posted the ticket, because no e-mail address was left. I searched the “Bitcoin Movement Georgia” community for active local mappers but couldn’t find any. If you know a dedicated local who would like to maintain the Bitcoin-friendly businesses, please let me know.  
For now I’ve chosen to disable Bitcoin.

Edwin
empty_child (2026-01-03 20:23:47+00:00): Of course, on-site observation is more reliable
Frankly, I think that some merchants even don't know that they accept crypto. I wanted to ask once in Georgian post office about payment in crypto, but it was kinda suicidal mission ;)
About "community" : even if it exists, it doesn't overlap with OSM. Most edits is mine. If you see check_date on poi from me, it means that I personally saw a sticker about crypto (as I said, either CityPay or keepz). Other are filled out with the list of partners-merchants
Comino (2025-11-14 23:09:58+00:00): Hi,

In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes".

Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag !
Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead.

For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Merchants#tagging-guidance
and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bitcoin

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
https://btcmap.org/tagger/6794624
user_5359 (2025-11-15 08:41:59+00:00): Hi,

wrong changeset see version 1 https://www.osm.org/node/13305155290/history/1! Feel free to modify the mistake.
tux67 (2025-11-15 17:04:30+00:00): Was heißt "wahrscheinlich"? bei OSM werden für alle Beteiligten nachprüfbare Fakten gemappt. Idealerweise nach dem was vor Ort zu sehen ist, oder mit Angebe einer lizenzkonformen Quelle.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Erfasse_keine_Vorschriften,_die_nicht_durch_Gegenst%C3%A4nde_vor_Ort_repr%C3%A4sentiert_werden
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174665339
hicks011 (2025-11-15 17:14:09+00:00): Habe nirgendwo "wahrscheinlich" geschrieben :)
tux67 (2025-11-15 17:45:16+00:00): Huh ... Wo hab ich das denn gelesen .. Sorry
eggie (2025-11-14 21:52:23+00:00): Welcome to OSM..

Thx for your contribution. 
Please use the present addressnode to tag on.
Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2025-11-14 21:44:30+00:00): Hi.. please use the present addressnode.
Gr eggie
QuiLe (2025-11-17 22:05:14+00:00): This changeset was reverted because it used an incompatible source or relied on local knowledge when the user stated they were not from the area. Please see osm.org/copyright for more information.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174793880
PinRPG (2025-11-14 21:30:20+00:00): Correction: changeset reason is fixing the driveway overlap with the church, by identifing part of the building as the roof.
DD1GJ (2025-11-15 01:20:05+00:00): Revert, siehe osm.org/changeset/174667845
DD1GJ (2025-11-15 01:19:04+00:00): Revert, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174667845
TangledRockets (2025-11-15 18:10:55+00:00): Hi Kjon, 
in dies Changeset hast du vieles gelöscht und geändert, und ist sind dabei viele Informationen verloren gegangen. Adresse wurden von vielen Gebäude entfernt, einzelne Gebäude sind zusammengefügt, und einige Elemente sind einfach gelöscht worden. Zbsp Josef-Görres-Platz (place=square) ist jetzt weg. Viele kleine fußwege sind auch weg. ( Changeset ist sehr groß, habe nicht alles einschauen können)
Viele elemente, auch wenn gelöscht und neu aufgestellt worden, haben viele informationen verloren.
Ich sehe du hast die Liegenschaften Karte als Quelle verwendet. ( das Link lässt sich übrigens nicht öffnen, ich habe die Quelle manuell aussuchen müssen) Das beschreibt aber nicht die Aktuelle Lage vor Ort; wenn man vor dem Gebäude steht, sieht man das es anders ist als dem Staatlichen Liegenschaften Karte. (Zbsp die Karmerliterstr 6-10, auch vom Luftbilder kann man die Gebäudetrennung merken).
Ich und andere die den Ort kennen haben mühsam viele Details in der Stadt eingetragen, die jetzt auf einmal weg sind. Ich weiß viele Gebäude, insbesondere in der Altstadt, nicht korrekt bzw. veraltet sind, aber die durch Liegenschaftendaten alle zu ersetzen ist meine Meinung nach nicht den richtigen Weg.
Viele Stunden Arbeit sind jetzt verschwunden, ich hoffe du hast Verständnis dafür.
Grüße,
TR
felipeeugenio (2025-11-16 14:36:00+00:00): Hola. Dos cosas:
1) El tag building es para las estructuras, no para el recinto completo.
2) el tag access_control es para caminos, no para el condominio completo (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access_control). Con access=private en cada calle y en el portón basta en este caso, y ya está agregado.

Saludos y gracias
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174667704
Valerio_Bozzolan (2026-07-16 14:53:55+00:00): Hi! thanks for your contributions!

I have a question about this specific node: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2998461575

I noticed the added tag air_conditioning=info@rocketcoffee.se

Do you remember if it was a yes? or a no? Thank you so much!

In the meanwhile, I remove the current value to fix a warning. Thanks :)
DD1GJ (2025-11-15 01:16:25+00:00): Revert aller unsachgemäßen Änderungen

Hier wurden viele Häuser in seinem See "versenkt"! Sie arbeiten im OSM-Editor direkt in den Rohdaten des Projektes, so dass alle Bearbeitungen direkten (negativen) Einfluss auf unzählige Karten und Anwendungen haben. Um größeren Schaden zu vermeiden, habe ich daher alle Änderungen zurückgesetzt.

Verwenden Sie für solche "Planspiele" bitte z.B. https://umap.openstreetmap.de oder https://qgis.org/ . Da arbeiten Sie auf einer eigenen privaten Ebene bzw einem lokalen Datenbestand.

Weitere Informationen zu OSM finden Sie unter https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf
literan (2025-11-15 10:50:46+00:00): вы, конечно, тут наделали дел. Хаотично надвигали точки дорог. Прошу или делать аккуратно и тщательно, или лучше воздержаться от редактирования карты. Сижу, за вами тут все исправляю...
ZAV (2025-11-15 15:36:41+00:00): Ничего хаотично я не делал. Всё было по делу. Мог с тегами, что-то не по правилам сделать. А вот по месту, всё корректно.
Похоже, кто-то частично по бинку отрисовывал дороги, и они со смещением были.
Esri World Imagery (Clarity) правильно привязан.
literan (2025-11-16 10:01:48+00:00): ну зачем вы спорите с участником, который в разы опытнее вас? Дайте мне контакт, куда вам от править скриншот, и я пришлю вам пример того, как вы дорогу поломали. Все ходы ведь записаны в OSM.
ZAV (2025-11-16 10:40:12+00:00): В личке написал.
evgenykatyshev (2025-11-16 11:03:53+00:00): Hello! I can see you are you radically changing roads here every several days? Maybe I can help you with proper drawing? Could you explain what do you want to get?
cpof-tea (2025-11-16 17:13:37+00:00): Im trying to get around with osmpie and construct intersection the way it actually looks here. Sometimes osmpie renders glitchy intersection with different type of connections, that’s why I tried a lot of times to get it right. Any problem?
evgenykatyshev (2025-11-17 08:55:18+00:00): No problems then. It just seemed like an edit war or you don't know what to do. I decided maybe you need help.

In my opinion, the previos variant with multiple ways was better. I wouldn't draw for OSMPIE render
evgenykatyshev (2025-12-07 10:25:10+00:00): Hi again,

As I can see I've finished experimenting, but the last variand doesn't look like proper approach in my opinion https://prnt.sc/JYAe8_33GyRF

Also there are kept number of broken restrictions supposedly left after previous iteration.

Are you going to do something here? If no, I'd like to fix it on my own.
user_22712836 (2025-11-16 15:30:04+00:00): przeciez ta droga od Paczkowa  w żadnym stopniu nie powinna być trunkiem. To jest kilkukilometrowy odcinek.
pavvv (2025-11-16 15:37:18+00:00): Masz rację. Nie wiem jakim cudem takie coś zostało podniesione. Jak chcesz to możesz przywrócić.
Filip009 (2025-12-01 20:21:37+00:00): Ahoj, prečo to rozdelenie nástupišťa? na A-D a E-H. prečo nie úplne na jednotlivé sektory. Je to vôbec potrebné? Nebolo by lepšie prediskutovať to najprv vo fóre? Čo na sektory hovorí OSM wiki?
Ajper (2025-12-01 21:05:47+00:00): Na informačných tabuliach aj pri hlásení vlakov sa vždy uvádza sektor A–D alebo E–H. Dokonca aj keď ťa to pošle napríklad na nástupište 5, zobrazí sa tam sektor E–H, aj keď iné sektory neexistujú. Dalo by sa to riešiť aj jednotlivo, ale toto mi príde jednoduchšie a prehľadnejšie.
Či je to potrebné? Podľa mňa určite áno. Keď sú sektory zakreslené v mape, každý si ich môže dopredu pozrieť a je menšia šanca, že sa pomýli — a to sa stáva (článok dole).
Inak som to spravil rovnakým spôsobom, ako to má napríklad Praha hlavní nádraží.
 https://www.zilinak.sk/clanky/31061/cestujucim-zo-zilinskej-stanice-usiel-vlak-pred-ocami-pri-cakani-venujte-pozornost-aj-oznaceniu-sektora
Filip009 (2025-12-01 21:10:27+00:00): Myslím, že expresu to tam nepíše. Zajtra teda pozriem ako je to v Prahe. Aktuálne mi to nepríde ako najlepšie riešenie kvôli reláciám jednotlivých vlakových spojení.
NeisBot (2025-11-14 22:45:41+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Self storage facility in Fort Pierce FL"
NeisBot (2025-11-14 22:45:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-11-18 13:56:37+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/174817724
user_22712836 (2025-11-15 15:52:17+00:00): Ta droga nie jest częścią TenT xdd, ważność nie opiera sięna czyiś widzimisie
Yunkers (2025-11-15 16:13:37+00:00): Pominąłeś fragment w Wschowej
pavvv (2025-11-15 17:35:35+00:00): Racja. Łatwo pominąć takie rzeczy przy automatycznych edycjach w Vespuccim.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-16 13:24:55+00:00): zmiana =trunk bez linka do dyskuji, na Discordzie był jakiś link do dyskusji ale tam były sprzeciwy bez poparcia

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174727027
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-16 17:09:46+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174727174 - został przywrócony

ponownie proszę o podanie gdzie to została rzekomo przedyskutowane (na Discordzie pojawił się jakiś link do posta który miał jakiś dziki mix wielu rzeczy a został oprotestowany - więc może jakaś pomyłka była, w tym zestawie zmian dalej go nie ma)
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-16 17:20:58+00:00): https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/stosowanie-tagu-highway-trunk-w-polsce/122106/1229
Dawid2849 (2025-11-15 01:08:49+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1038377183

Trochę się zagalopowałeś :P
pavvv (2025-11-15 07:01:08+00:00): Dzięki za czujność. Zapomniałem o _linkach na tych odcinku, więc potem na szybko je zmieniłem i nie chciało mi się szukać gdzie konkretnie się znajdują. Automatyczne edycje w Vespuccim są możliwe, ale niestety dość uciążliwe.
user_5359 (2025-11-15 08:19:08+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please move your node to the church building.
joost schouppe (2025-11-18 15:40:12+00:00): Dat klopt niet echt, er zijn nog altijd delen met naaldwoud in het Hallerbos
Joske1020 (2025-11-19 23:28:56+00:00): ja, ik dacht dat ik zomaar een deeltje kon veranderen maar daar veranderde het hele bos mee
pwbriggs (2025-11-16 20:38:33+00:00): Hey, I saw that you deleted this bus lane violator camera. Can you point me to some documentation or confirm that this camera was removed (e.g. was it removed for some reason as part of the SODA/SOAP camera initiatives)? Note that this was not a Flock camera; it was a city-operated bus lane enforcement camera, probably mounted on a streetlight pole.

Thanks, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
NeisBot (2025-11-14 23:39:42+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Empresa de intermediação de vendas de veículos"
NeisBot (2025-11-14 23:39:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisBot (2025-11-14 23:39:45+00:00): Por exemplo, uma versão mais neutra e factual da sua descrição poderia ser: "Empresa de intermediação de vendas de veículos"
---
(Auto-translation)
AndyB_66 (2025-11-15 19:13:39+00:00): Stosuj się, proszę, do zasad komentowania zestawów zmian, obowiązujących w społeczności OSM: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
giopera (2026-01-14 20:01:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted after verification with the [DBSN](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Italy/DBSN) that localities like this do not exist in Italy
Claudius Henrichs (2025-11-19 13:28:59+00:00): Hi, 
a railway=station object is still needed for a complete metro station relation. the stop positions on the track alone are not sufficient.
I've reverted the deletion of the station in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174859464
0235 (2025-11-17 00:36:18+00:00): Great work, I was not even aware a tag like this existed, and will try and keep an eye open myself for anything missing this tag.
willkmis (2025-11-15 01:34:48+00:00): Hey, thanks for adding all this info. There are a couple of edits in here that look a little weird to me though. For one, it seems like for a couple of points you moved them out of their buildings? Such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/490254388 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4111902590.

Also, from taginfo, I think cuisine=salvadoran is much more common than cuisine=el_salvador. And this doesn't really matter much, but I don't really think you need to add source= tags to the objects you modify, since it's on the changesets and there's info on the existing objects that isn't sourced from meta.
willkmis (2025-11-15 01:42:33+00:00): These two restaurants was also moved to the wrong buildings, basically on top of their neighboring businesses, when they were previously in the correct places: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11265325019 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/490254362. So I'm not sure how your import method is deciding to move nodes around but its accuracy is worse than the existing OSM data.
whammo (2025-11-16 20:51:30+00:00): Thanks for flagging Will. It looks like I accidentally clicked the nodes in the wrong order when merging the batch I did in Mount Pleasant. This is meant to just add data, not move or remove anything. I'll clean this up shortly!
willkmis (2025-11-17 16:40:24+00:00): Ah makes sense, thanks for fixing!
Baloo Uriza (2025-11-15 20:35:08+00:00): Just a heads up, on Empire Laundromat, you appear to have changed the phone number format from the ITU E.164 format typically used in OSM to the NANP format generally discouraged in OSM.  The former is more universally understood and natively understood by modern telephone systems and smartphones.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174671208
Nick123GD (2025-11-19 01:41:51+00:00): Thank you for the feedback.  I noticed some of my other changelists were updated to fix the phone number.  I will be sure to use the E.164 from now on.
Baloo Uriza (2025-11-15 20:32:11+00:00): Looking at the Esri aerial imagery, this appears to be in the middle of a vacant field. Do you have a picture I might use to improve the location?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174671273
Joske1020 (2025-11-15 01:44:10+00:00): well lookslike it broke the forest rendering... what should i do? can someone help me?
QuiLe (2025-11-17 22:56:40+00:00): This changeset was reverted because it used an incompatible source or relied on local knowledge when the user stated they were not from the area. Please see osm.org/copyright for more information.

osm.org/changeset/174793965
QuiLe (2025-11-17 22:56:24+00:00): This changeset was reverted because it used an incompatible source or relied on local knowledge when the user stated they were not from the area. Please see osm.org/copyright for more information.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174793965
NeisBot (2025-11-15 02:16:48+00:00): Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added cafe with building details"
NeisBot (2025-11-15 02:16:48+00:00): Hi abbassshh, welcome to the OSM projekt and thanks for your contribution!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish
NeisBot (2025-11-15 03:21:46+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisBot (2025-11-15 03:21:47+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "ร้านยา"
NeisBot (2025-11-15 03:22:35+00:00): ตัวอย่างเช่น ร้านขายยาที่เป็นกลางและเป็นข้อเท็จจริงมากกว่าของคำอธิบายของคุณอาจเป็น: "ร้านยา"
---
(Auto-translation)
NeisReview (2025-11-18 13:56:00+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/174817706
Bella01 (2025-11-15 17:32:20+00:00): Rampa kojom se blokira prolaz od broja 20a do broja 24 iza zgrade.
user_5359 (2025-11-15 08:11:34+00:00): Welcome to OSM! 
Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/1989905983
 (monument) more than 100 meters. Please check the correct position. If you need help, you are welcome!
Roydon Olive (2025-11-15 05:04:41+00:00): Proposed seems like the wrong tag, it's physically there, you can see it in the imagery.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-12-24 06:20:57+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised Editing & import

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176338499
kguenther24 (2025-11-21 16:39:45+00:00): Do you have any sources or reasoning as to why the deletion of this construction area was made?
vasony (2025-11-16 15:12:33+00:00): Szia!

"Szent István-székesegyházpark" ennek ez a neve tényleg, vagy csak elnevezted mert ott volt a székesegyház előtt. Mert nem tűnik korrektnek helyesírásilag.

Tamás
Udarian (2025-11-15 18:00:32+00:00): still in the road road area, see:

https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Udarthegreat/public-sources/refs/heads/main/other/Screenshot%202025-11-15%20125108.png

Happy Mapping,
Udar
pantufla (2025-11-16 10:30:02+00:00): Interesting 🤓
BCNorwich (2025-11-18 08:58:53+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Review, OSM is a live worldwide data bank therefore it relies on mappers contributing ground truth, verifiable data. I can see that most of what you've added is highly likely to not be ground truth, it looks like fiction.

Please remove or fix anything that isn't ground truth.

Regards Bernard.
NeisBot (2025-11-15 05:26:29+00:00): Hi naisam_, welcome to the OSM projekt and thanks for your contribution!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment #NoComment
NeisBot (2025-11-15 05:26:30+00:00): Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Updated residential roads, added private access, courthouse, modified road surfaces, removed building attributes"
ianlopez1115 (2025-11-29 16:43:44+00:00): Private driveways can be mapped, refer to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mapping_private_information#Exceptions for more details.