piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Necessarycoot72 (2023-10-01 21:24:18+00:00): There are some issues with the way you mapped this

First, this is the wrong way to use the building tag, You essentially mapped this as one giant building, you should have used the residential=apartments tag instead. You can read about it on the [wiki](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:residential ).

Secondly, you used layer = -1, meaning you specified that this building was underground. Since I doubt a building this size is underground, I'm assuming this is a mistake. 

And lastly, the area the feature covers honest correlate with the area on the ground. The feature criss-cross through roads and building with no coherent relation with area being mapped. In the future [map what you see on the ground.](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Verifiability). 

I fixed all of these issues in changesets 142005218, which can be viewed here. changesets/142005218
4004 (2023-09-30 21:40:22+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10970880927 а этот Ozone не Ozon?
Rico557 (2023-10-03 12:57:49+00:00): Тот, тот. Видимо англ.клавиатура в телефоне сама добавила. Будем исправлять.
kartler175 (2023-10-01 11:10:03+00:00): Wenn Du Flächen neu anlegst, kümmere dich bitte auch um de Überreste deiner Bearbeitungen:
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=12.39370&lat=48.95128&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.95&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=12.39235&lat=48.92024&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.95&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways
emergency99 (2023-09-30 11:00:45+00:00): I will ask again, what is this for?
Useless lines doubling up parts of tram lines?
user_5359 (2023-09-30 16:28:47+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I remove your SEO SPAM entry (mostly foreign keys). Please have a look on https://wiki.osm.org!
Frans S (2023-10-04 08:17:09+00:00): Hallo. Leuk je werk weer tegen te komen.
Een opmerking over mappen van building=construction . Tag ze alleen zo als je een kamerindeling ziet of heel duidelijk onder constructie. Meestal zijn het gewoon ommuurde ruimtes voor vee, tuin etc. dus Barrier-wall

Even wat anders,
Je werkt in Ideditor. Heb je nooit overwogen over te stappen naar JOSM.?  Dit programma heeft zoveel meer mogelijkheden om te mappen en te corrigeren.
Vriendelijke groeten
Frans
rskedgell (2023-10-25 11:27:49+00:00): You appear to have tagged a section of Didcot Road as foot=no in response to a StreetComplete task asking "Are pedestrians forbidden to walk on this road here?"

I'm trying to find any evidence in Bing Streetside imagery that there really is a (signed) pedestrian prohibition here. I cannot see any TSRGD diagram 625.1 "pedestrians prohibited" signs on the imagery, so do not believe that a prohibition exists. Is this a new signed restriction created by a traffic order more recent than the Bing streetside imagery?

The wiki states that access tags reflect legal access, not whether it would be pleasant, a good idea, safe, etc.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:foot

As real pedestrian prohibitions on public roads other than those tagged as highway=motorway or motorroad=yes in the UK are quite rare and are always signed, this quest is probably better left disabled.
rskedgell (2023-10-31 09:11:52+00:00): Removed foot=no in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143408514
ssam (2023-10-31 20:21:26+00:00): Sorry, I misunderstood what the quest was asking.
rskedgell (2023-11-01 10:49:40+00:00): Don't worry, that quest seems to catch a lot of people out and possibly only in a UK context.
Dave Venables (2023-10-01 10:45:07+00:00): Artist is Tracey Meek, updated OSM https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141982090
Awoobis (2023-10-05 09:36:18+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3924394
Likely public space
Rogoyski (2023-10-05 15:32:44+00:00): Toczy się na ten temat dyskusja w https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3842402. Wiemy, że teren jest dostępny, ale nie wiemy, w jakich dokładnie granicach. A jedyny mapowicz, który być może był na miejscu, i mógłby odpowiedzieć, nie odpowiada na pytania.
Rogoyski (2023-09-30 11:06:14+00:00): Invalid description. This changeset removes the Katyń museum area from the military zone.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-24 02:16:36+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11228752768/history has fixme:type = school that was added in this edit
Would it be amenity=school ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dschool )
Something else?
OSM_RogerWilco (2023-10-01 20:15:13+00:00): Da hast Du leider die alten und inzwischen abgerissenen Gebäude wieder eingetragen. ;-) Das sind nicht die neuen Gebäude. Die Luftbilder sind immer etliche Monate bis Jahre alt!

Ich mache die Eintragung wieder rückgängig.

Viele Grüße
4004 (2023-09-30 21:46:28+00:00): а что там?
Maloss34 (2023-10-01 15:12:12+00:00): nelle istruzioni si afferma che "Il numero di abitanti è solo un valore indicativo: in caso di valori di popolazione prossimi alle soglie prevale l'importanza dell'abitato in relazione al contesto geografico." Ascoli è prossima alle soglie ed ha una rilevante importaza storico-culturale essendo più antica di Roma e possiede  un enorme centro storico. Quindi il Limite Q	UANTITATIVO è soccombemte rispetto a quello QULITATIVO (importanza della città . Si prega di non cambiare l'attribuzione di CITY ... 
(ANCHE CHIETI HA MENO DI 50.000)
Carto'Cité (2024-01-13 15:15:26+00:00): Bonjour mxmd45,
Tu as repassé toute la voie verte en cycleway or, il ne s'agit pas d'une piste cyclable pour plein de raisons. Par exemple la présence de panneaux C115 et l'absence de panneau C113 et B22a.
Je vais corriger dans ce sens. N'hésite psa à me dire si tu as la moindre question ou remarque :)
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
BCNorwich (2023-09-30 13:47:59+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

This just looks so wrong. It's definitely not a motorway junction, and it wouldn't be numbered anyhow. Then your motorway junction was inserted into 11 bus route relations.

It looks to me that the entrance to the hotel is mapped properly a little further south on High Road.

Thus I've reverted this changeset.

Regards Bernard.
Ziggarillo (2023-09-30 15:39:33+00:00): No, the entrance to the Hotel is now directly off the roundabout. The roundabout now has 4 exits. I live mins away and often use it. I dropped my wife off at the hotel last week for a work social event.
Ziggarillo (2023-09-30 15:44:22+00:00): I can provide photographic evidence if you like, Iuse the 5 bells interchange 4 days a week collecting my wife from working at Basildon Hospital.
BCNorwich (2023-09-30 16:02:11+00:00): Hi, OK. It was tagged incorrectly, the name "to the pub and hotel" was also incorrect, that's a description. So it did need at the very least correcting. As no tags were right I removed it

Anyway, thanks for the explanation. Is it possible for you to map the service road? I could then check the tagging.

Regards Bernard.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2023-09-30 16:21:18+00:00): Removing this crossing makes cycling routing fail, because now the park is not accessible by bike rom Rue Saint-Hubert north of the service road to Cour Municipale. I will add it back.
BeaZal (2023-10-01 07:12:18+00:00): Las vías de servicio son vías publicas a pesar de las limitaciones de transito que pueden establecer sus titulares.De nuevo voy a eliminar la vía porque no es publica con acceso privado sino que es privado.En la entrada aparte del portón esta el cartel que indica que es propiedad privada,la señal de prohibido entrar y la cámara que graba la entrada a la propiedad.
paunofu (2023-10-01 14:49:21+00:00): Buenas tardes BeaZal,

La etiqueta highway=service no indica que un camino sea público o privado, lo que determina ese estado es la etiqueta access=* .

Para la via de acceso a una propiedad privada el etiquetado correcto sería highway=service + service=driveway + access=private 

Un saludo, Pau.
sanchi (2023-10-01 14:52:36+00:00): Hola.

El etiquetado de acceso privado es el que indica si es de uso público o no lo es. El tipo de acceso no tiene nada que ver con el tipo de vía que sea. 
Todo lo que estás indicando es lo que representa cualquier tipo de vía que sea access=private que es como estaba representado de manera correcta.

Por favor deja de borrar la vía de manera incorrecta.

Saludos.
4004 (2023-09-30 21:49:32+00:00): а что там?
Lancelotance (2023-09-30 12:33:11+00:00): 这个修改集修正了#141948119 中的500个无标签节点。 In this changeset, I rectified totally 500 nodes without tag in changeset #141948119.
Lancelotance (2023-09-30 12:37:20+00:00): 这个修改集修正了#141948119 中的500个无标签节点。 In this changeset, I rectified totally 500 nodes without tag in changeset #141948119.
aceman444 (2023-10-17 22:50:32+00:00): Pozor na popisy sad zmien. Tu ziadne routovanie "neopravujete", ale menite vlastnosti autobusovych zastavok. Zase to "ref" aj ked uz existuje local_ref. Dokonca pridanie hodnoty ref, ktora je v rozpore s local_ref (B vs A a pod).
Inak to pridavanie network:wikidata na kazdu zastavku je dost zbytocne, ale to je zrejme automaticky vymysel editora iD, ktory pouzivate.

Inak pridavanie informacii o departures_board je prinosne, aj ked zase len natlaceny cestovny poriadok je prakticky na kazdej zastavke na Slovensku. Keby tam bola digitalna tabula, tak to by bola zaujimava informacia.
aceman444 (2023-10-17 22:28:43+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1212042099 preco zduplikovane nastupiste MiU Vajnory, ktore tam uz je zakreslene bodom? Ak ste chceli vyjadrit dlzku nastupista, staci highway=platform.

A preco pridavate pismena nastupist (A,B) pomocou ref=, ked to v celej Bratislave mame pomocou local_ref ?
aceman444 (2024-05-02 23:04:14+00:00): Routing from one platform to the other was already possible (via the footway) so this change seems not useful.
Langlaeufer (2023-10-12 14:16:38+00:00): hello PJ120
you removed a valid connection and added 2 links with wrong oneway direction. 
I will repair it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141949956
Langlaeufer (2023-10-12 14:56:48+00:00): Auch die Abbiegebeschränkungen waren nicht korrekt.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141949956
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-25 05:23:44+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143094614
user_5359 (2023-09-30 16:24:51+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I remove your SEO SPAM entry (mostly foreign keys). Please have a look on https://wiki.osm.org!
SomeoneElse (2023-09-30 13:41:40+00:00): Hello AzerAkhundov,
Please use changeset comments that are a bit more informative than simply "road"!
Best Regards,
Andy
AzerAkhundov (2023-09-30 14:06:53+00:00): I guess now I am under total control by moderators )))
Tim Grose (2023-10-31 10:38:58+00:00): Interesting about the new name and the "s" or not. I also never thought it had any one as always just considered service road to Sainsbury's car park. Maybe it was given one due to the building of Crown House https://www.hawesandco.co.uk/new-homes/crown-house That and indeed FindMyStreet lists it as Crummock but seems best to show it as the street sign (presume also new) even if that might be wrong. If they correct the sign we can update OSM.
Dimitar155 (2023-10-01 18:41:54+00:00): Привет lqlqlqlio,

Само една сграда ли е? Според https://haskovo.info/201077/официално-откриха-новия-holiday-park-с-praktiker-край-х/ би трябвало да има още една Г-образна сграда с десетина магазина. 

Поздрави,
Митко
lqlqlqlio (2023-10-02 05:18:46+00:00): Здрасти,
Нанесена е (не от мен) само основната сграда. Има още няколко (не смятам, че е една; залепени една за друга), които са доста начупени с ъгли.
Dimitar155 (2023-10-02 07:22:21+00:00): Аз съм добавил сградата, бях останал със спомен че оставих само една бележка. На мен ми изглежда като една сграда, но в кадастъра (имот 77195.214.4) е дадена като три долепени сгради. Като се появят нови сателитни снимки може да се поправи.

Добавих цялата сграда и промених улиците в паркинга според сайта им (https://holidaypark.bg/bg/ritejl-parkove/haskovo) и според изкопите. Би трябвало да е сравнително вярно. Добавих и магазините. Когато имаш възможност, можеш ли да провериш дали всичко е вярно?
lqlqlqlio (2023-10-02 07:32:25+00:00): Супер! Изглежда добре. В събота не всички магазини бяха отворили все още. Ще мина някой ден пак.
rskedgell (2023-10-18 06:57:26+00:00): Is there really a legal restriction prohibiting pedestrians here?

I can't see any diagram 625.1 "Pedestrians prohibited" signs in the Bing streetside imagery.
okwithmydecay (2023-10-18 07:10:46+00:00): Good point, I don't know if there is a legal prohibition, though there is certainly no pavement here.
Landsol (2023-10-10 01:34:44+00:00): こんにちは、近くで活動している Landsol と申します。OSM への協力、ありがとうございます。
この変更セットを確認しましたが、いくつか不完全な点がありますので、ご確認いただけますでしょうか。
- いくつかポイントを追加していただいていますが、通常、ポイントには、それがどのような地物なのかを示す適切な「タグ」を設定することになっています。あなたが追加されたポイントは、名前しか持っていません。
- 現実に存在する地物一つに対して、OSM 上ではそれを表現するノード、ウェイ、エリアなどは一つであるべきです。「花のみち」や「宝塚ホテル」などは、すでに別のノード、ウェイなどが存在しています。

編集に際して、不明な点などがあれば、質問できる場所がありますので、ご活用ください。詳しくは、OpenStreetMap Japan のウェブサイトをご覧ください。
https://openstreetmap.jp/
85Bas (2023-10-01 09:21:04+00:00): Beste Jan,

Je noemt dit een langdurige afsluiting, maar volgens je bron duurt deze slechts een maand. Voor zover ik weet is het niet de bedoeling om dergelijk korte afsluitingen op de basislaag van OSM aan te brengen, aangezien het zo niet routeert. Voor dit soort kortdurende wijzigingen is eventueel access:conditional (met daarbij een tijdvak) bedoeld. Zo heb ik het destijds bij de ombouw van het Julianaplein ook aangepakt.
Jan Wilts (2023-10-01 12:48:13+00:00): Hi Bas,

Bedankt voor je feedback. En je hebt helemaal gelijk. Ik heb de weg nu ingetekend een access:conditional.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-08 09:28:45+00:00): Hello!

You used
colour=braun
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3920304782/history

Have you maybe meant
colour=brown
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-09-30 14:22:15+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 140369862, 141393358, 141393514, 141394094, 141394181, 141394436, 141652578, 141653316, 141653777, 141654965, 141744367, 141744427, 141744523, 141744548, 141744588, 141744643, 141744716, 141744912, 141745264, 141806790, 141806957, 141807659, 141808298, 141808524, 141929212, 141929497, 141930648, 141931109, 141931299, 141931336, 141931368, 141931426, 141931434, 141942448, 141942496, 141942539, 141942549, 141942740, 141942962, 141943034, 141943120, 141943180, 141943206, 141943697, 141944377, 141950521, 141950583, 141950653, 141950837, 141951418.
SomeoneElse (2023-09-30 14:36:02+00:00): This revert was done because there was no engagement following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15116 and previous messages.  I'm sure that there will need to be changes here (for example, I doubt that https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11905591 exists in the same way as before), but we need to discuss about the best way of handling boundary changes and name changes.
See below https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/edit-warring-over-nagorno-karabakh-region-republic/57413/14 for discussion.
There is more tidying of broken admin boundaries to be done (broken by various editors) such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11905590 .
user_5359 (2023-09-30 16:26:33+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I remove your SEO SPAM entry (mostly foreign keys). Please have a look on https://wiki.osm.org!
Andrea Musuruane (2023-10-01 08:46:20+00:00): Ciao. Non ci sono highway=living_street in Italia: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/891454025 Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141952668
Kai Johnson (2024-07-14 21:48:31+00:00): Hi! Please make sure you've got the right golf course in the right state before you add the address information. Thanks!
NieWnen (2024-06-15 16:08:32+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152728301
CurlingMan13 (2026-01-27 17:17:44+00:00): When adding parking lots, please try to address or merge the nodes so there aren't duplicates.

I know, note is older, and your mapping is probably much better now.  :)
pitfire (2023-10-01 03:24:15+00:00): Hallo Wandercamper,

zuerst ein willkommen bei OSM und danke für Deine Beiträge!
Bitte beachte, dass die Einträge der Phone Nr. im internationalen Format (ITU-T E.164) vorliegen sollte

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone#Usage

VG pitfire
SafetyIng (2023-10-01 11:26:18+00:00): Hallo Richtkreiser, leider habe ich bisher noch keine antworten Bekommen. An welchen Elementen richtest du die Darstellungen aus? Welche Orthophotos legst du zugrunde? Leider hast du dies nicht in deinen Quellen angegeben.

Gleichzeitig bitte ich dich nochmals deinen Changeset-Kommentar klarer zu fassen. "Kartieren von Geodaten" ist nicht aussagefähig.
PLima785 (2023-10-18 12:18:09+00:00): Boas Pedro, reparei que nesta edição adicionaste alguns elementos que não existem (tipo na nova avenida entre a Sonae e o parque Maia).
Qual é a data das imagens que usaste? a Bing e ESRI são as mais recentes para a zona da Maia ( e Grande Porto em geral)
Outra coisa é que agora tens duplicação em certos locais.
Vê bem se consegues modificar, senão tem que se reverter e meter zonas mais pequenas de cada vez, para evitar estes erros.
PedroMTG13 (2023-10-18 12:39:48+00:00): Boas, tentei remediar o que consegui no centro da Maia. Este changeset é um importe da COS2018 é normal ter alguns erros e sobretudo numa onde existe muita diversidade do landuse. Vais ser um trabalho de acertos, mas com o tempo
topolusitania (2023-10-18 18:29:43+00:00): Importações de areas relativamente grandes devem ser discutidas pela comunidade.
É o segundo caso onde importações tuas duplicam edições feitas por outros mapeadores, resultando numa salganhada em que ninguém se entende.
As tuas importações, bem intencionadas obviamente, não têm prioridade sobre edições anteriores. Deves melhorar estas edições e não pura e simplesmente sobrepores outros elementos
Cumprimentos
TL
Jose Luis Infante (2023-10-01 00:07:19+00:00): Hola,
gracias por la edición, aunque es mejor no borrar elementos si no se está muy seguro que ya no existen realmente. 
En este caso has borrado un edificio de un supermercado. No conozco la zona, pero seguramente el edificio sigue en pie aunque la cadena de supermercados ya no esté en dicho edificio. En ese caso el edificio debe permanecer, y se deben eliminar o modificar los datos que ya no sean válidos.
Si es así, dime que sigue el edificio y lo recupero.
Si el edificio realmente ya no existe, entonces se puede borrar.
Un saludo!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141953873
senda91 (2023-10-01 00:25:11+00:00): Buenas noches, José Luis: te planteo la situación y tú decides lo más adecuado, si te parece. El supermercado no existe en esa ubicación desde hace 3 años y medio, actualmente todo ese solar está siendo demolido para construir nuevas viviendas, de momento la nave está así que imagino que tendrás que recuperar el edificio pero sin el punto del super (no fui capaz de hacerlo). Disculpa las molestias.
Jose Luis Infante (2023-10-01 16:04:17+00:00): Muchísimas gracias por la información. Entonces entiendo que el edificio todavía existe pero que en breve será demolido, no?
senda91 (2023-10-01 16:44:37+00:00): He preguntado y el edificio quizá sea reutilizado. Si es viable recuperarlo, yo me encargo de eliminarlo o modificarlo cuando se actualice la situación (que espero controlar mejor las herramientas de edición)
Jose Luis Infante (2023-10-01 17:24:50+00:00): De nuevo gracias por la información.
Ya he recuperado el edificio. Si desaparece o cambia el uso solamente tienes que editarlo de nuevo.
Te animo a seguir editando, y si tienes dudas consulta la wiki o pregunta a la comunidad de OSM España en https://t.me/OSMes
Un saludo!
Tomas_J (2023-10-05 22:10:01+00:00): Hallo, 
thank you for improving the Openstreetmap. Great job. I have just two small remarks: 

1. the name tag should not contain general names of the object (e. g. Dvojkriz). It should contain only the official names listed in documents or on the objects itselves. Could you correct this, pls?

and 

2. the denomination=catholics reveals by default that the religion=christian. You should not delete this tag. Could you, please, return it back?

Thanks and keep mapping.

Tomas
Margaréta (2023-10-06 16:16:44+00:00): Hi, thank you for your comments:

1. I changed the name of this place, but even this official name contains the name of the object (Slovensky dvojkriz)

2. I don't know exactly what you mean, both places are Catholic and have this tag assigned to them

Thanks, Margareta
DressyPear4 (2023-10-02 03:40:51+00:00): 'building' corresponde apenas a construções individuais, e não a todo conjunto
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141954369
mkopinsky (2023-10-02 17:31:38+00:00): Seems like you're doing a lot of water tower work - great! Would you mind using a changeset comment specific to that?
Kri_ttt (2023-10-01 07:04:26+00:00): ผมคิดว่าการใช้ highway=pedestrian จะเหมาะสมมากกว่าการใช้ highway=path

ผมมองว่าการใช้ highway=pedestrian นั้นจะเฉพาะเจาะจงมากกว่า และเหมาะสมกับรูปแบบบริบทของทางในบริเวณเยาวราช, ซอยวานิช และบริเวณรอบเคียง
Nithinat S (2023-10-01 07:22:21+00:00): highway=pedestrian ใช้สำหรับถนนที่กว้างพอแต่ไม่อนุญาตให้รถยนต์ผ่านครับ ถนนเหล่านั้นแคบเกินกว่าที่รถยนต์จะผ่านได้ ตาม wiki ของประเทศไทยกำหนดไว้ให้ใช้เป็น path ครับ
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Thailand
(หัวข้อ Rough guidelines for minor highway tag decision-making )
spughetti (2023-10-21 14:40:44+00:00): Hi Keith, please don't add names to features unless you're sure they're correct. I've removed the name from this street.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142927577
Langlaeufer (2023-09-30 19:56:40+00:00): Hallo cspinner.
Ist da gerade eine Baustelle oder warum ist da jetzt Einbahnstraße? Wäre gut sowas als note mit an die Linie oder wenigstens in den Changeset-Kommentar zu schreiben.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141954916
cspinner (2023-09-30 20:37:07+00:00): Danke für die Anmerkung. Es handelt sich hierbei um eine temporäre aber nicht limitierte Verkehrsberuhigung, die durchaus länger dauern wird oder gar permanent wird.
user_177389 (2023-09-30 15:14:43+00:00): You take a break now, all that comes out is crap - lots of broken relations.
pitfire (2023-10-01 03:32:35+00:00): Bitte beachte, dass die Einträge der Phone Nr. im internationalen Format (ITU-T E.164) vorliegen sollte
_Atlas_ (2023-09-30 21:13:33+00:00): Bonjour Bric@. Merci pour vos contributions. Pourriez-vous limiter vos modifications à des régions plus petites, par exemple des pays, afin qu'elles soient plus faciles à vérifier ?