piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Marc Bosch Matas (2024-11-29 10:31:54+00:00): 

Se han revertido todos los changesets de este usuario porque es un usuario bloqueado decenas de veces con cuentas múltiples (https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/usuarios-editando-en-espana-bajo-sospecha-vandalismo-malas-practicas-y-otros/2510/), por lo que sistemáticamente incumple los Términos de Uso de OSM (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenStreetMap_account#Account_Names_and_Multi_Account_Policies y https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Terms_of_Use#VI._Account_cancellation_or_suspension).
El usuario realiza múltiples y pequeñas ediciones para dificultar que sus cambios puedan ser revisados.
Este usuario (con sus multicuentas) está mapeando únicamente según las ortofotos y sin tener en cuenta el conocimiento local (probablemente usa fotos a pie de calle sin permiso) e, incluso, elimina PDIs con todo el historial de forma injustificada. Con sus cuentas, sigue eliminando etiquetas name:ca de lugares en los que se habla catalán.
Ante todo lo expuesto y por las diversas anomalías, revierto todos los changesets porque, de revisar cada uno de ellos, únicamente nos dedicaríamos a ello, como si fuésemos administradores. En caso de revisar todas las ediciones de este usuario que ya ha sido bloqueado por 10 años con otras cuentas, nunca podríamos seguir mejorando la base de datos debido a revisar durante horas cada uno de los conjuntos de cambios y, por lo tanto, dejaríamos de lado seguir mapeando para añadir nueva información.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159735633

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159735603

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159735574
Marc Bosch Matas (2024-11-29 10:31:46+00:00): 

Se han revertido todos los changesets de este usuario porque es un usuario bloqueado decenas de veces con cuentas múltiples (https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/usuarios-editando-en-espana-bajo-sospecha-vandalismo-malas-practicas-y-otros/2510/), por lo que sistemáticamente incumple los Términos de Uso de OSM (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenStreetMap_account#Account_Names_and_Multi_Account_Policies y https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Terms_of_Use#VI._Account_cancellation_or_suspension).
El usuario realiza múltiples y pequeñas ediciones para dificultar que sus cambios puedan ser revisados.
Este usuario (con sus multicuentas) está mapeando únicamente según las ortofotos y sin tener en cuenta el conocimiento local (probablemente usa fotos a pie de calle sin permiso) e, incluso, elimina PDIs con todo el historial de forma injustificada. Con sus cuentas, sigue eliminando etiquetas name:ca de lugares en los que se habla catalán.
Ante todo lo expuesto y por las diversas anomalías, revierto todos los changesets porque, de revisar cada uno de ellos, únicamente nos dedicaríamos a ello, como si fuésemos administradores. En caso de revisar todas las ediciones de este usuario que ya ha sido bloqueado por 10 años con otras cuentas, nunca podríamos seguir mejorando la base de datos debido a revisar durante horas cada uno de los conjuntos de cambios y, por lo tanto, dejaríamos de lado seguir mapeando para añadir nueva información.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159735633

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159735603

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159735574
Marc Bosch Matas (2024-11-29 10:31:35+00:00): 

Se han revertido todos los changesets de este usuario porque es un usuario bloqueado decenas de veces con cuentas múltiples (https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/usuarios-editando-en-espana-bajo-sospecha-vandalismo-malas-practicas-y-otros/2510/), por lo que sistemáticamente incumple los Términos de Uso de OSM (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenStreetMap_account#Account_Names_and_Multi_Account_Policies y https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Terms_of_Use#VI._Account_cancellation_or_suspension).
El usuario realiza múltiples y pequeñas ediciones para dificultar que sus cambios puedan ser revisados.
Este usuario (con sus multicuentas) está mapeando únicamente según las ortofotos y sin tener en cuenta el conocimiento local (probablemente usa fotos a pie de calle sin permiso) e, incluso, elimina PDIs con todo el historial de forma injustificada. Con sus cuentas, sigue eliminando etiquetas name:ca de lugares en los que se habla catalán.
Ante todo lo expuesto y por las diversas anomalías, revierto todos los changesets porque, de revisar cada uno de ellos, únicamente nos dedicaríamos a ello, como si fuésemos administradores. En caso de revisar todas las ediciones de este usuario que ya ha sido bloqueado por 10 años con otras cuentas, nunca podríamos seguir mejorando la base de datos debido a revisar durante horas cada uno de los conjuntos de cambios y, por lo tanto, dejaríamos de lado seguir mapeando para añadir nueva información.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159735633

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159735603

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159735574
ZLima12 (2024-12-02 03:05:55+00:00): Hello,

I appreciate your contribution here, but there are a few issues that I'd like to point out, so that you can avoid making them in the future.

First, please break up your changesets by geographic area. In this changeset, you made unrelated changes across the whole state of New York; these ideally should have been one changeset per city, approximately. This helps other mappers verify your work. Other mappers have informed you of this issue, but it seems like you have still been making large edits since.

Secondly, you changed a few road classifications in this changeset. Aside from this not being represented in the changeset comment, the roads that you upgraded to motorway should not be motorways. Please refrain from upgrading short segments of road to motorway, and try engaging with the community (see OSMUS Slack and Discord) before making such changes. Many states have their own guidelines which should be followed now.

The previous two issues were the most important ones here, but there are a couple more. You specified `damage:event=tornado` on way 442540277, without citing any sources. Please clarify what happened here, and how you know about it. The last thing is that descriptive names such as "Drive-in Cinema (disused)" should be avoided; "disused" should never go in `name`, and instead should be conveyed in either the opening_hours tag or by prefixing the amenity tag with `disused:`. If "Drive-in Cinema" is not the official name of the location, this should not go in the name either.

I appreciate you reading through these issues, and look forward to your response.

Thanks,
John
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-11-30 02:44:22+00:00): This changeset removed all tags from the highway: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/415858560
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159723094
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-11-30 02:44:52+00:00): reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159761766
NeisBot (2024-11-29 00:36:48+00:00): Hello drgelfant, welcome to OSM, and thank you for your contributions!

I've taken a look at your recent edits and wanted to discuss a few discrepancies I noticed regarding the surrounding environmental features. Specifically, the locations in your edits don't seem to align with the typical geographical characteristics expected in that area. Here are some (max 10) relevant links to the edits:
https://osm.org/node/12383496101

Could you please take a look?
Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#Somewhere
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=159723169
InsertUser (2024-12-01 03:55:20+00:00): This change appears to have placed a doctors office at 0°N 0°W, rather than somewhere in Canada. I think this was probably a mistake?
pitscheplatsch (2024-12-03 16:10:46+00:00): No response, reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159887725
pitscheplatsch (2024-12-03 16:11:09+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4542156
jeslop (2024-12-02 15:52:05+00:00): Saudações osm_usr, nesse changeset você excluiu um caminho que depois redesenhou: isso não é necessário. Se o caminho original estiver errado, você poderá modificá-lo sem excluir o caminho existente. 

Por outro lado, o comentário do changeset não é descritivo o suficiente para que o restante da comunidade saiba o que você alterou: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Good_changeset_comments

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
TrickyFoxy (2024-11-29 10:19:03+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159735232
TrickyFoxy (2024-11-29 10:19:47+00:00): Use https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org or local render
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-11-29 01:22:45+00:00): This changeset was only included in reversion since it edited elements from the changesets that needed to be reverted. Some changes were restored in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159723864
MarinoBM (2024-11-29 09:34:10+00:00): Resumiendo: que has revertido el conjunto de cambios porque lo has confundido con otro de otro usuario.
Acepto las disculpas.

Un saludo.
CurlingMan13 (2024-11-29 05:44:17+00:00): What is "Apex"  What does it mean in the context of what you did?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159724141
Glassman (2024-11-30 00:13:11+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.

#TIP: square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q"
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159724142
Glassman (2024-11-30 00:13:20+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159724186
kingkingHK (2026-06-19 03:49:41+00:00): Why did you make the entire runway `runway=displaced_threshold`?
KlopanRin (2025-07-09 12:26:02+00:00): How come you don't know the name of that cafe???
KlopanRin (2025-07-09 12:26:17+00:00): I don't know either
Glassman (2024-11-30 00:18:03+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.

#TIP: Extend the existing building outline rather than adding another building.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159725105
Glassman (2024-11-30 00:19:55+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.

Actually my comments on the previous changeset apply to his one.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159725119
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2024-11-30 13:09:02+00:00): This is indeed a long crossing. False positive. I reverted it back to a crossing
citrula (2024-11-30 10:20:27+00:00): I have reverted this edit because you have added this business to the entire building. Please add it as a point in the correct location instead. Let me know if you have any questions !

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159768570
user_18023081 (2024-11-30 10:26:36+00:00): Did someone pay you to post this
trigpoint (2024-11-30 11:34:56+00:00): And please keep your changeset comments precise and describe what you have changed. In this case 'Added a restaurant'. Mappers do not have to wade through a pile of spammy verbal diarrhea.
GeoMechain (2024-11-30 15:32:28+00:00): Hi,
Little tip for the next time you map a pagoda :) you can change the building value like this : building=temple and if the temple area is obvious you can combine an englobing polygon with the values: amenity=place_of_worship + landuse=religious + religion=buddhist . 
Oh and in general avoid to fill name with descriptive information (like: name=House) instead you can precise the type of the building in the building tag (cf. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Buildings#Values)
Happy mapping!
Bests
GeoMechain (2024-12-02 17:05:11+00:00): My bad, no amenity=place_of_worship with landuse=religious : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dreligious#Usage
nevw (2024-11-29 08:33:45+00:00): Hi, when mapping waterways please draw in the direction of the waterflow - always down hill
TrickyFoxy (2024-11-29 11:24:16+00:00): Пожалуйста, не используйте 2ГИС. Они не давали разрешения
citrula (2024-11-30 10:25:21+00:00): I like to use https://projets.pavie.info/yohours/ to make sure I get the opening_hours strings correct.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159727993
citrula (2024-11-30 10:22:57+00:00): You can press "Q" to square the corners of objects you draw.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159728189
rempshaener (2024-11-29 16:58:02+00:00): Hallo,

du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Änderungen gebeten.

Vorab ein großes Lob für den ausführlichen Kommentar im Änderungssatz, so ist deine Anpassung sehr gut nachzuvollziehen.

Entsprechend der von dir beschriebenen Beschilderung hast du die Beschränkungen wie folgt gesetzt:
bicycle=designated
foot=designated
motor_vehicle=agricultural

Eigentlich müsste es heißen:
bicycle=yes
vehicle=agricultural

Das muss man auswendig wissen; es gibt einige Tools, mit denen man die Schilder zusammenklicken kann, z.B. https://trafficsigns.osm-verkehrswende.org/DE

Bei Fragen gerne melden.

Viele Grüße
rempshaener (2024-11-29 16:58:41+00:00): Sollte heißen "Das muss man NICHT auswendig wissen"
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-12-01 01:31:23+00:00): This changeset left the ramp disconnected.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159729628
Gorger (2024-12-03 04:10:01+00:00): Hi Spaghetti Monster🍝, Thank you for pointing out my mistake and thank you for making the corrections. I’ll be more careful making edits and more thoroughly review the outcome of them going forward.
eggie (2024-11-29 07:32:47+00:00): reverted by changeset #159729880
eggie (2024-11-29 07:35:11+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback   Je bent zaken aan het anderen in de editor van OSM. 
Dat is de 'tool' om daadwerkelijk wijzigingen aan te brengen aan de wereldkaart van OSM.
Voorlopig heb ik je edits teruggedraaid. 
Wat is je bedoeling?
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-11-29 07:59:45+00:00): Dag AvN

Yep..  Nu routeert het voor alle uitzonderingen.
Groet
eggie
Syl (2024-11-29 07:34:13+00:00): Note source : https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4491411
wambacher (2024-11-30 10:48:20+00:00): Moin, 

die PLZ 06804 gibt es nicht (mehr).

Weder bei der Post und sonst wo - außer bei vielen auf OSM basierende Online-Systeme.

Laut meiner PLZ-Karte https://postcode.wambachers-osm.website/?map=15/51.690956/12.39363&base=OSM&data=WPCHM,PCBDE,PCDE,WPCDE, 
Wikipedia https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muldestausee_(Gemeinde)
und der Webseite der Gemeinde https://www.gemeinde-muldestausee.de/ hat Muldestausee die PLZ 06774

Ich konnte übrigens in deiner angegebenen Source © GeoBasis-DE / LVermGeo LSA, dl-de/by-2-0, DOP 20, ALKIS
keine PLZ-Angaben finden. Ich vermute, dass diese evtl. veraltet ist, da in den letzten 1-3 Jahren hier viele Grenzen verändert wurden.
decay42 (2024-11-30 14:49:00+00:00): Da hast du vollkommen Recht, da hab ich irgendwo nicht aufgepasst .. danke fürs korrigieren!
wambacher (2024-11-30 18:06:16+00:00): kann jedem mal passieren.
berndw (2024-12-04 09:41:31+00:00): Hallo, willkommen bei OpenStreetMap

Kann es sein, dass das Haus mit 800m² Grundfläche etwas groß geraten ist?
;-)

Kannst Du das ändern?
quantenschaum (2025-06-05 18:03:20+00:00): Hi, diese waterway=fairway Linien entsprechen nicht so wirklich der Definition https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Dfairway. Das "müllt" die (See)Karte ganz schön zu. Gehört das in OSM? Sind das ausgewiesene Kayakwege? Irgendwas mit route=canoe wäre vielleicht sinnvoller. Was denkst du?
TFI71 (2025-06-06 10:26:39+00:00): Hi, die waterway=fairway Linien sind Teil des Schlei Wasserwanderweges. Er ist entsprechend der OSM Documentation eingefuegt worden, siehe folgende Links

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Water_trails

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Dlink

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Daccess_point

Die Hauptschifffahrtsstrasse in der Schlei ist Segelshiffen und Booten vorbehalten. Kleinfahrzeuge wie Kayaks, canoes, SUPs etc. duerfen diese nicht befahren, nur kreuzen. Die Ein- und Aussetzstellen koennen daher nicht mit der Hauptwasserstrasse direkt verbunden werden. Dies waere auch nur an den schmalen Stellen sinnvoll.

Eine Route (route=canoe) ist hier nicht speziefisch zugefuegt, da der Wasserwanderweg Schlei eher ein Netzwerk von Moeglichkeiten bietet. Route=canoe macht eher Sinn bei Flusswanderwegen. Man koennte aber vielleicht den Hauptrundkurs als Route ausweisen. Dies ersetzt aber nicht den tag waterway=fairway (siehe OSM Dokumentation)
quantenschaum (2025-06-11 11:29:04+00:00): waterway=fairway scheint mir eher für größere Fahrwasser zu sein, aber es gibt für Kayak/Kanu wohl kein richtig gutes Taggingschema, das scheint eher das Problem zu sein. Da sollte mal was festgelegt werden.
BCNorwich (2024-11-29 13:21:39+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've amended the business's tags to those accepted by the OSM database. Data must be presented in a certain manner in order to be rendered.

Regards Bernard.
Jrachi (2025-01-16 17:05:02+00:00): Ciao.
In duration:backward e forward  devi inserire il tempo di percorrenza.
Probabilmente un errore di copia incolla?

Ivo
Federico Ce (2025-01-17 08:33:25+00:00): Ciao IVO, si certo. Nelle modifiche apportate mi sono limitato a cambiare i dati su symbol, perchè il percorso non appariva come sentiero CAI.
Jrachi (2025-01-17 08:41:51+00:00): Ok, grazie.
Ho corretto.
Se trovo altri errori simili li correggo direttamente.
eggie (2024-11-29 09:06:11+00:00): 
Hoi Dave, 
De oude situatie heb ik weer teruggezet ivm de gebroken busrouterelaties.

Ik heb een verzoek om er naar te kijken gestuurd naar een van de OV experts.

Maar even in de gaten houden. Er komst vast wel een reactie op deze changeset.
MVG
eggie
Leo Slager (2024-11-29 19:50:07+00:00): Hoi Dave, Eggie,
Na het herstellen van de gewijzigde situatie was er uiteraard sprake van wat fouten in de routerelaties van bus 410 en 866. Ondermeer reden die over de verkerde weghelft.
Verder was een opvallende fout dat de verbindingsweg van de parallelweg naar het busstation niet  was vastgemaakt aan de nieuwe rijstrook.
Dat heb ik dus gecorrigeerd.
Daarna de routerelaties gerepareerd.
Dave, als je serieus met routerelaties aan de gang wilt gaan, zul je de editor JOSM moeten gaan gebruiken.
De editor iD die je nu gebruikt laat altijd beschadigde routerelaties achter op de kaart.
Overigens repareer ik die beschadigingen met veel plezier.
Dus laat dat je niet hinderen.
Veel plezier met verder mappen.
aTarom (2024-11-29 15:50:37+00:00): Hola, aquest element es un edifici
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/237144799/history
no una entrada a una cova, que voleu indicar per trobar un valor més exacte?
Salutacions
Jacopo (2024-11-29 08:46:25+00:00): Fonte: https://www.ladige.it/territori/trento/2024/11/28/auto-moto-e-bici-apre-a-trento-nord-il-megastore-bep-s-tempio-per-gli-appassionati-1.3938050
mavl (2025-05-13 15:06:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
redd (2025-01-28 21:51:27+00:00): Hallo TinaWagner,
vielen Dank für deinen ersten Beitrag zu OpenStreetMap!

Ich habe ein paar kleine Korrekturen vorgenommen:

1. Der Aufzug hatte den Namen "WC, Rollstuhlgerecht, Barrierefrei"

2. Die Toiletten hatten das kaum noch genutzte diaper=no, ich habe auf das gebräuchlichere changing_table=no geändert

3. Die Treppen hatten den beschreibenden Namen "Treppen - Eingangsbereich", dies habe ich zur Beschreibung geändert

4. Der Parkplatz hatte den beschreibenden Namen "Behindertenparkplatz", dies habe ich auch zur Beschreibung geändert

Schöne Grüße,

redd
mavl (2025-05-13 15:05:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
mavl (2025-05-13 15:08:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
mavl (2025-05-13 15:09:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
StC (2024-12-03 19:49:53+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre qui passe par là. Je m'occupe de la réparation.
MacDony (2024-12-04 08:20:23+00:00): Bonjour,
Oui, bien sûr, pas de soucis ;)
Bonne journée
Denis
thopf (2024-12-01 12:53:36+00:00): Hello! The direction of the oneway for motor vehicles in Lichtenfelsgasse was flipped in September 2024 (not shown already in arial imagery). I corrected that. Greetings.
Langlaeufer (2024-11-30 20:11:26+00:00): Hallo koastoas,
Bing ist oft die schlechteste der Luftbildvorlagen. Hier im Harz auf jeden Fall sehr schlecht. Die Geometrie vom Hotel Mein Bergblick passte vorher sehr gut zu den amtlichen Orthophotos wie sie auch ESRI zeigt und die du verwenden kannst. Wäre schön, wenn du die Hotel-Geometrie von vorher wieder herstellst.
Grüße Langläufer
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159733632
emvee (2026-07-05 11:45:59+00:00): Hallo Johan,

Prima de kaart bij te werken voor de hulpdiensten maar emergency=no is niet de bedoeling, onder emergency vallen ook politie/ambulancemotoren, zie ook https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Hulpdiensten#Gebruik_geen_emergency=no

Ik heb dus emergency=no verwijderd en breedtes (width) toegevoegd. Geen paaltjes gezien. Met width zou de juiste route moeten worden gekozen.

Specifiek voor de begraafplaats vraag ik me af of de brug, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/337043216 geschikt is voor zwaardere hulpvoertuigen.

Groeten,

Martin.
eggie (2024-11-29 11:06:30+00:00): Dag Fernando.. Is dit een openbare parkeerplaats of wellicht alleen voor klanten (access=customers)  of access=private ?
eggie (2024-11-29 11:04:47+00:00): Dag Fernando   Dat lijkt mee wel kloppen zo.
Kan iedereen z'n fiets kwijt hier of is het wellciht access=private of customers?
MVG
eggie
pitscheplatsch (2024-12-01 12:56:21+00:00): Just a test?
eggie (2024-11-29 10:26:18+00:00): Dag Johan   
je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=159734013

Je komt er wel in, maar nooit meer uit.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-11-29 10:30:41+00:00): Ik heb het nu maar even opgelost  anders routeert het niet meer voor fietsers richting Steenenstraat.
Parking ook weer teruggelegd.
Er is nog een 'dingetje'met dat fietspad . Zal even kijken.
eggie (2024-11-29 10:32:41+00:00): Fietspad is oke...   Er zijn hier straatnamen die op elkaar  lijken.
Groet
eggie
JohanWetering (2024-11-29 10:35:58+00:00): dank voor het verwerken!
eggie (2024-11-29 10:55:41+00:00): Het laatste stuk van de HBS Laan vanaf de stuw naar het bruggetje  heb ik voorzien van C1 tags  muv fietsers.
Het daar overigens altijd een chaos als de school uitgaat. 
Denk dat rouwstoeten zo wel rijden. 
Dat ben ik wel eens een accesstag over tegen gekomen, maar die weet ik nu niet te vinden.
https://smoothefiets.ddns.net/html/verkeersbordenkaart/index.php?lat=51.821007807&lng=4.413730502&z=18