piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
arjunaraoc (2023-07-30 12:09:03+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1193003317 can not be identified from bing imagery.  This is part of landuse industrial already. Unless you know the area and name of the plot owner, it is better not to map such things.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139147533
arjunaraoc (2023-07-30 12:09:38+00:00): Please provide detailed changeset comments for facilitating review
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139147533
adrianojbr (2023-07-28 19:16:38+00:00): Olá, ProjetoMapeia!

É possível adicionar os traços Strava com mais qualidade para avaliar qual imagem mais bem posicionada ou corrigir o posicionamento da imagem, conforme https://erickdeoliveiraleal.medium.com/tutorial-strava-openstreetmap-josm-or-id-2e2003f4aea3

Cabe lembrar que é o registro principalmente de ciclistas e pedestres, então tem que ter atenção ao mapear as vias por essa camada. Mas, sem dúvidas, são ótimos para conferir o alinhamento das imagens de satélite.

Abraço!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139147749
adrianojbr (2023-07-28 19:16:38+00:00): Olá, ProjetoMapeia!

É possível adicionar os traços Strava com mais qualidade para avaliar qual imagem mais bem posicionada ou corrigir o posicionamento da imagem, conforme https://erickdeoliveiraleal.medium.com/tutorial-strava-openstreetmap-josm-or-id-2e2003f4aea3

Cabe lembrar que é o registro principalmente de ciclistas e pedestres, então tem que ter atenção ao mapear as vias por essa camada. Mas, sem dúvidas, são ótimos para conferir o alinhamento das imagens de satélite.

Abraço!
adrianojbr (2023-07-28 19:16:39+00:00): Olá, ProjetoMapeia!

É possível adicionar os traços Strava com mais qualidade para avaliar qual imagem mais bem posicionada ou corrigir o posicionamento da imagem, conforme https://erickdeoliveiraleal.medium.com/tutorial-strava-openstreetmap-josm-or-id-2e2003f4aea3

Cabe lembrar que é o registro principalmente de ciclistas e pedestres, então tem que ter atenção ao mapear as vias por essa camada. Mas, sem dúvidas, são ótimos para conferir o alinhamento das imagens de satélite.

Abraço!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139147749
danieldegroot2 (2023-07-28 18:44:01+00:00): See also
- https://www.tidytowns.ie/u_reports/2012/2012%20County%20Waterford%20Ardmore%20647.pdf.pdf
danieldegroot2 (2026-07-31 14:11:29+00:00): See also
- https://www.facebook.com/photo?fbid=1149890140501164&set=pcb.1149890923834419
adrianojbr (2023-07-28 19:26:45+00:00): Olá, LucasMaus!

O código da rodovia vai em ref=* mesmo e name é para o nome somente.

Além disso, não se deve remover a etiqueta highway=*, a qual indica o tipo de via.

Abraço!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139147942
adrianojbr (2023-07-28 19:20:41+00:00): Olá, LucasMaus!

A linha removida representa o limite de bairros e, portanto, existe.

Abraço!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139147980
milos21 (2023-07-28 18:53:32+00:00): V Iľanovskej doline som neznačil po sedlo pod Kúpeľom, aj keď podľa návštevného poriadku je to tam dovolené, nie je to moc cyklistický terén.
pyrog (2024-05-21 08:11:49+00:00): Bonjour

Pour info un sentier se tague avec highway=path (et non pas avec highway=footway. Ce tag est utilisé pour les chemins piétons "aménagés", du genre des allées entre 2 immeubles en ville ou les allées PMR dans une tourbière, en forêt).

Je corrige.

Cordialement,
Yves

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1193007378
adrianojbr (2023-07-28 19:28:11+00:00): Olá, LucasMaus!

Precisei reverter todas as alterações que você fez até aqui, pois geraram muitos erros e conflitos, sendo os principais expostos nos comentários de changesets anteriores.

Caso queira refazer as alterações, por favor, leia a documentação antes e tenha mais cuidado.

Abraço!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139148413
eteb3 (2023-08-09 05:49:18+00:00): Hi Borbus,

Looks like you were at Fletton Quays recently. 

Did you notice if the hotel has Hilton livery on the side yet?

Thanks.

eteb3
Borbus (2023-08-09 16:46:33+00:00): Good question... Unfortunately I didn't note that specifically, I only know it's going to be a Hilton from local knowledge, which I guess is why it's already labelled on here.
eteb3 (2023-08-09 17:10:57+00:00): Yeah... local knowledge about the hotel doesn't stop there! But this isn't the place for politics. ;-)

I'll try and look next time I'm down there, and hopefully resolve your notes, too.
LockOnGuy (2023-07-28 23:59:03+00:00): Hello ڕاستی, I asked you many times before to not delete Arabic names entirely, here I see you deleted the Arabic name in n7578476185 and changed it to Kurdish only, Please, if you want to make 'name' in another language, just move the original name to name:ar instead..
LockOnGuy (2023-07-29 00:02:39+00:00): Also, may I know why did you delete n7947892485?
seewäldler (2023-08-01 15:10:36+00:00): Hallo ChrissW-R1

Rund um die Auffahrt FN-Ost hast du ein foot=no an die Strasse gehängt, welches so nicht ausgeschildert ist. Dort ist auch keine Kraftfahrstrasse, man darf als Fussgänger an der Strasse entlanglaufen (ob das schön oder sinnvoll ist ist ja egal) Auch an vielen weiteren von dir geänderten Stellen bis hin zur Autobahnabfahrt Weißensberg ist das so. Mir scheint es, als ob Streetcomplete hier nicht zutreffende Änderungen vorschlägt/veranlasst. Schaust du dir das noch einmal an?
ChrissW-R1 (2023-08-01 16:01:19+00:00): Reverted in changeset 139307591

https://osm.org/changeset/139307591
seewäldler (2023-08-01 16:07:24+00:00): Hallo ChrissW-R1

Nur interessehalber, kommen solche Vorschläge von Streetcomplete aufgrund von Strassenmerkmalen wie Ausbau/motorroad/Doppelspurigkeit? Auf z.B. den mapillary Bildern kann man ganz gut die wenn auch nicht aktuelle Beschilderung erkennen, werden die dazu herangezogen?
ChrissW-R1 (2023-08-01 16:20:09+00:00): StreetComplete erzeugt die Quests rein aus den OpenStreetMap-Daten. In diesem Fall ist es vor allem abhängig von der Straßenart. (siehe https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete/blob/bf9bd173f9ebc8c3d7f0b160b36abfafac9b8234/app/src/main/java/de/westnordost/streetcomplete/quests/foot/AddProhibitedForPedestrians.kt#L16)

Hier bin ich tatsächlich davon ausgegangen auf einer Kraftfahrtstraße zu sein. War mir relativ sicher das entsprechende Schild gesehen zu haben. Aber offenbar habe ich mich geirrt.
Schuld hat also nicht StreetComplete sondern meine fehlende Aufmerksamkeit.
ChrissW-R1 (2023-08-01 16:21:27+00:00): Sorry falscher Link. Hier der korrekte Permalink: https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete/blob/bf9bd173f9ebc8c3d7f0b160b36abfafac9b8234/app/src/main/java/de/westnordost/streetcomplete/quests/foot/AddProhibitedForPedestrians.kt#L17
seewäldler (2023-08-01 19:16:00+00:00): Dann ist mir klarer woher solche Änderungen kommen, ich meine mich zu erinnern dass es an der B31 schon einmal ein tagging foot=no an Stellen gab an denen das nicht zutrifft. Die B31 ist zwischen Überlingen und Lindau bis auf wenige Abschnitte mit Tunneln oder baulich getrennten Fahrbahnen keine Kraftfahrstrasse, also auch für Radler/Fussgänger/Trekker befahrbar.
mcliquid (2023-08-17 14:44:54+00:00): @seewäldler: Das war vor vielen Monaten, ggf. schon vor Jahren durch mich :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139148747
NorthCrab_upload (2023-07-28 19:20:13+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2690538602
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/263440060

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
4004 (2023-07-29 22:02:02+00:00): здравствуйте, спасибо за правку.
фото можно добавить через мапиллари, либо привязать обьект к википедии соотв тегом
Famlam (2023-07-28 19:27:13+00:00): Bron onjuist (nog van vorige keer). De juiste bron was: survey
MannerheEm940 (2023-07-30 20:26:13+00:00): а тут у тебе "посьолок"? якщо твоя маленька голова чула таке, то це не означає що це місце має таку назву, покажи документи про "посьолок"
MannerheEm940 (2023-07-30 20:26:41+00:00): свої фантазії тримай подалі від мап, побачу ще раз такі імена - буду масово відкочувати
MannerheEm940 (2023-07-30 20:26:50+00:00): вандал і сволота ти!
MannerheEm940 (2023-07-30 20:27:04+00:00): срань!
Myazyk (2023-07-30 20:51:52+00:00): Ох, а ти готовий показати документи з назвою Будівництво?
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 22:38:25+00:00): підрило
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 22:46:05+00:00): Що ти твориш, що за назви!
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 22:53:07+00:00): москальска гнида!
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 23:04:17+00:00): Будівництво на "стройька" замінив вже?
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 23:08:32+00:00): не гніви Бога!
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 23:13:16+00:00): В країні війна, а ти москалькі імена даєш мапі, похуй як вони називаються групою людей, якщо по докам немає таких назв, на вулиці немає таких вказівників і написів - це твоя вигадка! "Стройка", тьху, блять!
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-31 22:16:14+00:00): щоб ти більше мапи не чіпав!
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-31 22:18:54+00:00): "Актуалізація даних" твоя в жопу!
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-31 22:26:33+00:00): грішник!
miBoieq (2023-07-30 20:21:09+00:00): ти усюди напхав свою "стройку"?
miBoieq (2023-07-30 20:21:17+00:00): навіщо ти це робиш?
miBoieq (2023-07-30 20:21:42+00:00): Він неугомонний
MannerheEm940 (2023-07-30 20:24:06+00:00): щоб ти більше свої русизми не пхав куди не треба!
MannerheEm940 (2023-07-30 20:24:13+00:00): гівнюк!
MannerheEm940 (2023-07-30 20:24:47+00:00): засланець!
MannerheEm940 (2023-07-30 20:24:59+00:00): те що ти робиш - гидота
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 22:46:21+00:00): підрило
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 23:09:44+00:00): Псуєш мапу своїми вигадками?
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 23:11:48+00:00): засранець
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-31 22:23:55+00:00): просто засранець
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-31 22:24:43+00:00): сволота рідкісна
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-31 22:36:13+00:00): Гріх!
miBoieq (2023-07-30 20:19:05+00:00): Ти навіщо псуєш мапи?
miBoieq (2023-07-30 20:19:16+00:00): Що ти русизми пишеш?
miBoieq (2023-07-30 20:19:40+00:00): Покажи документи де написано що тут "стройка"?
MannerheEm940 (2023-07-30 20:20:17+00:00): І тут те саме
MannerheEm940 (2023-07-30 20:20:33+00:00): знову у нього "стройка"
MannerheEm940 (2023-07-30 20:20:48+00:00): ти шкідник 100%
MannerheEm940 (2023-07-30 20:23:35+00:00): просто засранець
MannerheEm940 (2023-07-30 20:35:15+00:00): гівнюк!
MannerheEm940 (2023-07-30 20:35:28+00:00): срань що ти робиш на мапах!
MannerheEm940 (2023-07-30 20:35:40+00:00): це огидно, падло ти москальске!
MannerheEm940 (2023-07-30 20:35:51+00:00): продажна потвора!
MannerheEm940 (2023-07-30 20:35:58+00:00): стройка блять
MannerheEm940 (2023-07-30 20:36:08+00:00): хуєсос
MannerheEm940 (2023-07-30 20:36:13+00:00): підрило
MannerheEm940 (2023-07-30 20:36:22+00:00): уєбень
MannerheEm940 (2023-07-30 20:36:41+00:00): сука, ти так своєю "стройкою" показав хто ти є, падло
MannerheEm940 (2023-07-30 20:36:48+00:00): тварюка
MannerheEm940 (2023-07-30 20:37:01+00:00): ненавиджу тебе, собака
MannerheEm940 (2023-07-30 20:37:09+00:00): сволота рідкісна
MannerheEm940 (2023-07-30 20:37:19+00:00): засранець
MannerheEm940 (2023-07-30 20:37:39+00:00): за русизми тобі піздєць
Myazyk (2023-07-30 20:57:32+00:00): Не у мене Стройка, а у мешканців цього населеного пункту
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 22:58:46+00:00): Будівництво на "стройька" замінив вже?
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 23:14:44+00:00): просто засранець
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 23:27:00+00:00): Москальські імена додаєш? Стройка, тьху! Побійся Бога!
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-31 22:21:03+00:00): срань ти
MannerheEm940 (2023-07-30 20:16:36+00:00): Що ти робиш? Ти мову не знаєш чи просто дурня валяєш?
MannerheEm940 (2023-07-30 20:16:46+00:00): Де ти бачив такі назви?
MannerheEm940 (2023-07-30 20:17:16+00:00): Будівництво на "стройка" замінив?
MannerheEm940 (2023-07-30 20:17:25+00:00): ти паскудиш мапи!
MannerheEm940 (2023-07-30 20:17:37+00:00): псуєш своїми домислами!
MannerheEm940 (2023-07-30 20:22:38+00:00): що ти твориш
MannerheEm940 (2023-07-30 20:22:50+00:00): ну і вандал же ти
Myazyk (2023-07-30 20:55:16+00:00): Ти бував у Стебнику, що вважаєш, що знаєш як там які місцевості люди називають?
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 22:33:12+00:00): твої потуги нікому не потрібні
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 22:43:07+00:00): Стройка у тебе в дупі!
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 22:47:08+00:00): Твої потуги на мапі усі вже коричневі!
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 22:56:29+00:00): Гріх!
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 23:01:01+00:00): за русизми тобі піздєць
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 23:11:38+00:00): Розгніваєш своїми змінами!
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 23:24:45+00:00): Будівництво на "стройька" замінив вже?
Myazyk (2023-07-31 08:16:57+00:00): Кому потрібні твої потуги?
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-31 22:22:17+00:00): Ти не любиш людей, гівнюк!
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-31 22:27:25+00:00): грішиш знову!
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-31 22:35:06+00:00): засланець!
Hoàng Tuấn Việt (2023-07-29 11:07:41+00:00): If you continue to add this false bridge, i’ll continue to remove it. I’ve reported your case and your account is currently under review of continuously adding false information. 
Once again, their is no bridge being construct here, according to the city planning until 2040. Don’t 
swear or explain with your nonsense idea!
Bvonter23 (2023-07-29 13:56:21+00:00): Okay then, this is a real bridge project Hoang Tuan Viet, because the population is increasing, and i want to de-island Cat Ba. Construction is estimated to start in 2026 and will completed in late 2031. I uploaded this map video on Youtube so everybody knows. I swear.
Hoàng Tuấn Việt (2023-07-29 15:06:02+00:00): Instead of saying it’s real and swear, you NEED to provide the official documents published by the city’s authorities. I don’t care about your swear, it’s not legit. And also, you live in the US, i live in Haiphong, so don’t talk nonsense to me
Hoàng Tuấn Việt (2023-07-29 15:10:53+00:00): Also, you don’t have the permission or have any responsibility to plan a bridge for us. We, who are living in Haiphong, will be the ones to vote for the bridge, NOT YOU - an US citizen. If you are saying about youtube, i’ll search and also report your video because of providing false and misleading information.
Bvonter23 (2023-07-29 20:54:15+00:00): Please don't search and report my video, because it's owned by me as a moderator, and there is no blocking feature, also everyone knows it already . Okay i really want this real bridge because the Cat Ba population is increasing right now. You can't just keep reverting like this Hoang Tuan Viet.
Hoàng Tuấn Việt (2023-07-30 03:06:17+00:00): It is YOU who NEED TO STOP adding that false bridge in. As i said, you need to provide evidences to show that the bridge is legit instead of just saying its real, and it needs to be published by the authorities, not what you want! It seems like you do not understand English and that is why you keep adding it in.
Hoàng Tuấn Việt (2023-07-30 03:08:49+00:00): The population increase doesn’t relate to that bridge, we - who live here - do not want your bridge! We only plan to EXTEND THE EXISTING CABLE CAR LINE and BUILD MORE FERRY STOPS!
Bvonter23 (2023-07-30 14:30:54+00:00): I don't care about the extension of the Cat Ba Cable Car and building more ferries Hoang Tuan Viet. Just because i want to de-island Cat Ba, and the population is increasing there, we need a real four-lane bridge project for traffic. Stop Asking Decline Reasons And Using Capital Words! I uploaded the Cat Hai - Cat Ba Bridge project video on Youtube, and start of construction 2026, completion in late 2031.
Hoàng Tuấn Việt (2023-07-30 14:44:08+00:00): It doesnt matter whether you care or not. It is the official planning of the city. Keep your bridge in your mind you f***ing idiot. We dont need it
Bvonter23 (2023-07-30 14:53:22+00:00): Okay Hoang Tuan Viet, Stop Cursing! I want a real four-lane bridge project because to let traffic cross and want to de-islanding Cat Ba, due to population increasing. I already upload this map video on Youtube, so everyone still knows it. You should comment at me anyways sure.
Hoàng Tuấn Việt (2023-07-30 15:00:52+00:00): Wtf are you thinking? An imaginating bridge of yours? You are not even a citizen here, and you have nothing to do here, get tf back to the US. Stop mentioning your youtube video, you provide a false information and still being idiot and stubborn :)
Hoàng Tuấn Việt (2023-07-30 15:04:24+00:00): All edits on open street map must be based on legit information published by authorities of each region, all other excuses should not be accepted (including your wants). Also we, the editors who live in Haiphong, should be the ones to provide editing of Haiphong map, not you, a foreigner who have not even been to Haiphong once! Stop being ridiculously nonsense like that!
Bvonter23 (2023-07-30 15:07:54+00:00): Negative, i recorded and uploaded a Youtube map video and by adding information, setted to public, and allow all comments. Now everyone will still know this real bridge project Hoang Tuan Viet. Stop Asking Dumb Questions You Freaking Idiot Sure!
Hoàng Tuấn Việt (2023-07-30 15:11:41+00:00): It’s my pleasure to be on your YTB videos. Capture all the discussion of us and let your viewer comments on your stupidity!
Hoàng Tuấn Việt (2023-07-30 15:13:45+00:00): Also, i’m not a celeb, just a citizen providing the legit information of where i live. I never have edits on other places where i have never been to. Feel free to public your stupidity to your viewers. 
Regards!
Hoàng Tuấn Việt (2023-07-30 15:14:43+00:00): P/s: Make sure to capture the whole discussion.
Bvonter23 (2023-07-30 15:16:06+00:00): That's enough Hoang Tuan Viet. I already uploaded my map video to Youtube, setted to public, and applied all comments so everyone will still know it. You should comment me on Youtube please. I want a real bridge project.
Bvonter23 (2023-07-30 20:19:29+00:00): Now force me to build this real bridge project Hoang Tuan Viet.
Hoàng Tuấn Việt (2023-07-30 20:24:53+00:00): no worries, i'll check the map daily and will revert instantly whenever the bridge is re-added by you idiot!
Bvonter23 (2023-07-31 14:56:30+00:00): Okay then.
Tomas Straupis (2023-07-29 07:16:45+00:00): Reverting the braking of correct basin tagging.
user_5359 (2023-07-30 10:11:41+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note thatn OSM classification of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.

Please notice also: An address isn't part of the highway. It is part of the main building.
literan (2023-07-29 13:37:14+00:00): кривой адрес
NorthCrab (2023-08-06 16:21:04+00:00): What's the reason for removing name:ru ?
marc__marc (2024-09-04 22:39:02+00:00): Hello,
it's a active place of worship ?
if so add amenity=place_of_worship 
I have fixed the protestant tag.
Regards,
Marc
Dawid2849 (2023-07-29 13:09:02+00:00): based on note in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/113713497 I guess that there are some Internet cables. Maybe these ways should be tagged as communication=line instead of removing them?
Dawid2849 (2023-07-29 13:11:32+00:00): maybe the author can tell what he meant? he seems to be still active, just not as much as these 10 years ago
lakedistrict (2023-07-28 21:34:38+00:00): Please be careful when "upgrading" tags in the iD editor. Looking at your edit history you seem to be making a lot of similar changesets all over the country, so it is likely that these are being rushed and with no local knowledge. For instance in this  changeset shop names have been incorrectly split up into shop and branch tags, incorrect tagging has been added, and incorrect tagging has replaced "discouraged" tags. A lot of the edits made look fine, but please take care and check the changes you are making are correct.
gurglypipe (2023-07-30 06:12:03+00:00): I’ve reverted this changeset. Almost all the branch= tagging changes are incorrect, and you’ve dragged a bus stop node to the wrong place. As lakedistrict says, if you’re going to do automated tag updates, you need to make sure they are absolutely perfect. Just clicking ‘update tags’ everywhere is a waste of everyone’s time.

Reverted as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139196304
tyfi (2023-07-28 20:34:03+00:00): Most of these roads had names of the format "Pcr X" where X is an integer. The "cr" letters were lowercase. These were carried over from the TIGER import.
tyfi (2023-07-28 20:35:23+00:00): I should note that I couldn't determine whether PCR expands to "Perry County Road" or "Perry County Route", but picking one was a better thing than leaving abbreviations in the database.
tyfi (2023-07-28 20:36:43+00:00): I chose to use the "PCR X" form as the ref value for the ways. I think CR is more common nationwide, but PCR is more locally-appropriate. This is easy enough to change in the future. Similarly, I believe this is only an incremental improvement.
tyfi (2023-07-28 20:39:14+00:00): Notice: The accuracy of these expanded names is 100% dependent on the accuracy of the original Pcr-initialism names. I did not reference any sources beyond imagery (to correct one incorrect road, which I'll mention next) to verify numbering.
tyfi (2023-07-28 20:56:15+00:00): The one number I corrected was on way #18627830. It had "name_2" tag claiming it was a continuation of PCR 616. I verified on Bing StreetSide (which remarkably has coverage here) that it's actually PCR 622.
Tomas Straupis (2023-07-29 07:02:26+00:00): Pakeitimas atšauktas. Prašome neklausyti iD neteisingų „patarimų“.
5R-MFT (2023-07-29 19:26:55+00:00): ok.
marc__marc (2023-07-29 21:30:27+00:00): Hello,
in stead of note 	Closed down in 2022, you may use a more precise tag : end_date=2022
Regards,
Marc
rene78 (2023-07-29 21:50:16+00:00): Hi Marc,

added. Thanks!
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139190094

Cheers
Rene
eggie (2023-07-29 18:52:20+00:00): Dag Karel.. Je info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode. Je hoeft niet zelf adressen aan te maken.
MVG
eggie
HeyRayReh (2024-01-08 23:03:28+00:00): Hey!  Every time I've been to this section of trail, it's been open to at LEAST foot traffic, if not bike and horse traffic.  I understand that there may be plans to make it lit and fancy like the rest of the bike trail, but for the time being it seems perfectly useable as a mixed-use trail.  (And it seems like it's been waiting for the upgrade for over a decade so maybe they've abandoned the plans and just let the mixed-use trail stand?)  I'll make sure to go back there and check the signage to confirm before changing anything since it's been a couple months, but I'd propose opening up the access tags to at least designated if that sounds ok to you?
yawfle (2024-01-08 23:55:45+00:00): I'm assuming you already know about bikes being strictly banned on the trails at Griffith Park... same thing applies here. You absolutely do not want to route people on bikes onto that stretch of access road beyond where the newest section of bike path ends; drama will ensue:

https://www.latimes.com/socal/burbank-leader/tn-gnp-me-mariposabridge-20160130-story.html

Last year there were signs of renewed interest in doing *something* to continue the bikeway, but the ideas presented seemed pretty unlikely to work out IMHO:

https://ladotlivablestreets.org/projects/LA-Riverway-Phase-IV

I'd love to see something happen with that, but I'm not holding my breath. Meanwhile, that section should be access tagged as horses and pedestrians only. Seriously, people have been traumatized by those equestrians.
HeyRayReh (2024-01-09 02:12:05+00:00): Couldn't see more than the headline behind the paywall but I 100% getcha on the bike/horse rivalry.  I seem to remember there not being any no-bikes signs until the pavement stops and it becomes very clearly a bridle path, but better to play it safe.  Horses and pedestrians it is!