piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ChrissW-R1 (2025-01-31 12:33:51+00:00): Please check https://osm.org/note/4608714
Patrickov (2023-09-05 01:53:53+00:00): Did you know Kovoschiz reverted your change yeaterday and added a reason?  Did you read it?
GSF1200S (2023-09-05 03:07:20+00:00): Just read it. Reverting a nonexistent feature is not a good idea IMO.
Kovoschiz (2023-09-05 15:17:26+00:00): The bad idea here is you keep on deleting something others added without good reason.
CristianoBue (2023-09-10 13:56:24+00:00): Ao ínves de deletar a ponte, coloque ela intransitável. Ex.: highway=construction, construction=bridge and access=no
❤️‍🔥 (2023-09-05 04:35:49+00:00): Hi, I don't think this edit is correct. See https://www.nzherald.co.nz/rotorua-daily-post/news/new-speed-limits-set-for-state-highway-30-tikitere-to-whakatane/PL6GBKLCZNBQFALLYHHK2BBYLI/ 

you also appear to have changed the road name instead of the speed limit
Minh Nguyen (2023-09-25 17:43:45+00:00): Hi, thanks for reviewing this intersection. Note that any separate link way for a turn lane should begin at the “gore”, where a physical barrier begins, not where a solid painted line begins. The change:lanes tag is how we indicate a lane change restriction. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:change This tag doesn’t have a dedicated field in the Web-based iD editor, but you can open the Tags section at the bottom of the left sidebar to see it. Let me know if you have any questions about how that works.
Minh Nguyen (2023-09-25 17:48:39+00:00): Reverted per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Dual_carriageway ; will reapply any necessary realignment.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141742188
colemanerik (2023-09-26 00:19:57+00:00): So if no barrier means it isn't separated, then does that mean at Jager Court and Nimitzview Drive shouldn't be separated? Isn't the overall idea of OSM to be as detailed as possible?
Minh Nguyen (2023-09-26 03:12:26+00:00): The intersections at Jager and Nimitzview are modeled as dual carriageways as an exception to the physical separation principle, as detailed in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Dual_carriageway

I agree that this may not seem very consistent, but this is what data consumers have come to expect at this point. If you’d like to clarify the situation, you can map the traffic islands and even the roadway as an area: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:area:highway
Minh Nguyen (2023-09-26 03:22:32+00:00): I see what you mean about those intersections being undivided for a similar length. If they were modeled as single carriageways, it would probably be OK, but you’d have to update a number of lane-level tags accordingly.

The main problem with dividing the Beechmont intersection into a dual carriageway is that, even though mainstream routing engines can collapse the a divided intersection into a single point, that functionality won’t be able to handle a complex intersection this complex. Additionally, you had extended the link ways to the beginning of the turn lanes, causing the lane counts and lane change restrictions to become inaccurate.

Fortunately, most intersections aren’t this complex. A good rule of thumb is to use a dual carriageway whenever there’s a median and avoid a “braided” look due to gaps in the median that exist only due to turn lanes.
LockOnGuy (2023-09-05 13:26:48+00:00): ڕاستی, You changed the names of the flags from the official one to a not official name.      
This flag is registered officially in Iraq as "The flag of the Kurdistan region" not "The flag of Kurdistan"       
Can you revert your edit?           
Regards.
CurlingMan13 (2023-12-07 00:42:31+00:00): Note to others.  This user created an alt account.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Chris%20Denomy
Minh Nguyen (2023-09-25 17:50:22+00:00): Reverted per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Dual_carriageway ; will reapply any necessary realignment.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141742251
felipeeugenio (2023-09-05 11:51:16+00:00): Hola.
Se llama así? en inglés?
es una tienda de provisiones? para agregar el tag de tienda.
saludos
Paulagarciacamin (2023-09-05 13:20:57+00:00): Si, así se llama. Cafetería, servicios higiénicos, provisiones, servicios turísticos, rental de ski, de todo en realidad. Saludos
jb54osm (2023-09-06 13:52:24+00:00): Hi happi...,

The police building was already tagged - see adressnode.

Please revert this change as well.

Advice: stop changing OSM in the Netherlands if you don't know the rules overhere.
happilymappingrway (2023-09-06 17:09:17+00:00): Thank you for the information. I will go back and revert my edit. All the best to you.
happilymappingrway (2023-09-06 17:18:20+00:00): Okay.  Thank you for teaching me. I reverted my tag. 
All the best to you.
jb54osm (2023-09-06 17:23:18+00:00): Thank you! 

Those pesky national things went wrong. But your paths, hedges etc were good edits.
LockOnGuy (2023-09-05 13:20:50+00:00): ڕاستی, in this changeset you you have changed the name of n4407359536 from Arabic to Kurdish, this is not OK, the town is in Makhmur district which is administrative by Nineveh Governorate since 2017. Name should be in local Arabic.       
Please stop changing names to Kurdish in places that are outside of the Kurdish region, we told you that many times before, stop please.     
I will revert this changeset too unfortunately as you also deleted other Arabic names entirely like delete name:ar in n3789833458 which was correct.
LockOnGuy (2023-09-05 13:22:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by changeset 140850300, and the changeset comment is: Revert changeset 140828224, when a user deleted correct name:ar and changed the main name tag from official name by the administration to another language.
mike140 (2023-11-18 22:04:39+00:00): Что это у вас получилось?: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16283774
evgeniyakz (2024-07-22 07:38:02+00:00): Пытался границу раёнов привязать к тегам .
GSF1200S (2023-09-05 03:11:20+00:00): Why do you insist on reverting a  nonexistent feature?
Kovoschiz (2023-09-05 15:14:52+00:00): Why don't you explain how it's non-existent?
GSF1200S (2023-09-06 08:36:50+00:00): The location where you put this "cliff" is a relatively gentle slope which I can safely walk through without falling from height.
Kovoschiz (2023-09-06 09:23:02+00:00): 1. I'm not the one who added it first
2. What is "the location" ? It's a few hundred metres long. As I said, move it if the position is wrong. 
3. Are you sure you can drop down the slope directly from the village to Hong Lam Court?
GSF1200S (2023-09-06 13:28:46+00:00): There is no "cliff" in the first place, that's why it was deleted instead of being moved to somewhere else. 

The height difference is a retaining wall (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1204445516) along Siu Lek Yuen Road, which is appearent  ly not a "cliff".  

"natural=cliff" is defined in OSM as "a vertical or almost vertical natural drop in terrain topography as it occurs for example in form of coastal cliffs or escarpments."
GSF1200S (2023-09-06 13:34:25+00:00): If you are so obsessed with cliffs then it's OK.
Kovoschiz (2023-09-07 03:29:56+00:00): This is not true. There is a large slope behind the `=retaining_wall` , which this is trying to capture. 
`=cliff` has been widely used for slopes in HK.
Kovoschiz (2023-09-07 03:32:49+00:00): The `=retaining_wall` itself is very short. And there's a large gap here.
LockOnGuy (2023-09-05 13:09:31+00:00): 
ڕاستی, stop changing names of mountains and other stuff on the map that are outside the kurdish region. making 'name' tag in kurdish for places inside the kurdish local region is OK, but outside is not, especially if it's not an official name recognize by the official administration in Nineveh and Kirkuk Governorate. I will revert this changeset.
LockOnGuy (2023-09-05 13:13:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by changeset 140849914, and the changeset comment is: Revert name change when a user changed the mountain outside of the kurdish region from Arabic name to a kurdish name.
ڕاستی (2023-09-16 22:53:56+00:00): stop changing names of mountains and other stuff on the map that are outside the kurdish region"
Who told you that this is not a Kurdish region?
Where did you get that information that the mountain name isn't correct?
And how did you know that the name I added is not official?
LockOnGuy (2023-09-16 23:01:00+00:00): The Kurdish region is "Erbil, Sulaymaniyah, Duhok" Kirkuk Governorate is not part of the Kurdistan region and Makhmur District is part of Nineveh Governorate and administrated by Nineveh since 2017, therefore yes, it's not part of the Kurdish region. You don't know this?
alexwohlbruck (2024-10-21 20:47:28+00:00): Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't this road regarded as "boulevard"?
Joseph R P (2024-10-22 00:32:29+00:00): Some overhead signs refer to the road as 'Independence Expressway' (such as along I 227 and Eastway Drive) while traditional street signs along the road call it 'Independence Boulevard' (the edit I reverted called this the "Independence Freeway", which I can't find any evidence of). Considering that properties along the road are addressed to Independence Boulevard, it looks like 'Boulevard' is the correct suffix here and that the Expressway name is just an alternative name.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-01-25 11:44:34+00:00): 
Hello!

Sorry for bothering about an ancient edit.

But is PFM:garmin_type=0x6508 meaning anything at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11168687044/history ?

Can you remove this tag or replace by more clear one? It looks like debris from GPS trace import, handling similar tags on this object would be appreciated

(if there is more than one surviving tag like that from your edits: do you prefer separate message for each, list of all at once or something in between?)
muralito (2023-10-02 02:20:07+00:00): Hola Las cosas se tienen que mapear como son. Si es un comite, es un comite (office=political_party),no es un memorial.
OldManCelli (2023-10-18 02:31:07+00:00): Hello Maruf6095. Thanks for adding buildings to the map! Just please be careful. You seem to have duplicated a number of buildings in this and another changeset. I'm not sure how you added the duplicates, but please try to determine the issue if you would. 
changeset 140829597 and 140831060
OptikalCrow (2023-09-09 01:43:37+00:00): Hey there! I noticed you've been working on changing road classifications in this area- there's been some work done to standardize how we use the classification system in the US to prioritize network connectivity rather than physical quality of the roads. Generally, the guidelines are to keep major routes like trunk roads classed as trunk throughout their entire length, even if they go from a divided highway down to two lanes. 

These guidelines have been written out on the wiki under https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States/2021_Highway_Classification_Guidance! I recommend taking a look, as the community consensus in Alabama is to follow them rather than what the wiki may say about trunk vs primary based on physical construction. 

Downgrading existing trunk routes breaks the connectivity of the region (and also looks fractured when zoomed out since trunk roads render at a higher zoom level than primaries). Just keep this in mind as your changes may be reverted to restore the network!

Other than that, welcome to OSM and I hope you enjoy improving Alabama's map!
emersonveenstra (2023-09-05 11:59:51+00:00): Hi there,

You seem to have misunderstood the historic tag here. The wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:historic) says that it's meant to be used on things that still exist, which I don't think is the case for the historic railroads, and it's not a freeform description of what it was, that's better expressed by different tags
OldManCelli (2023-10-18 02:31:05+00:00): Hello Maruf6095. Thanks for adding buildings to the map! Just please be careful. You seem to have duplicated a number of buildings in this and another changeset. I'm not sure how you added the duplicates, but please try to determine the issue if you would. 
changeset 140829597 and 140831060
NorthCrab_upload (2023-09-05 05:30:16+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11168808780

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
kagebar (2023-09-05 07:07:54+00:00): Вітаю! Видаляю всі власні назви по типу "місце для кемпінгу". Позначання таких власних назв суперечить правилам маппінгу OSM. Не можна мапити під рендер, тому що вам так зручно
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:%D0%9A%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8F_%D0%BF%D1%96%D0%B4_%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B4%D0%B5%D1%80
arjunaraoc (2024-01-04 09:43:38+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).

Please keep your changeet update to small areas.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140832525
Stranger_I (2023-09-05 07:50:13+00:00): Приветствую! Что значит нет этих дорог?? Я лично ногами их проходил. А вот чтобы ты хотя бы был из Челябинской области я сильно сомневаюсь, учитывая твои правки по всей России. Не смей так шалить, а то DWG сделает атата.
Андрей КоS 19761980 (2023-09-06 03:40:03+00:00): Добрый день. Проходил, согласен,  а вот проезжал ли? ))
Stranger_I (2023-09-06 16:19:39+00:00): Отличить тропу от дороги сумею. Поэтому и написал, что проходил по ДОРОГАМ. Хотя может тебе с дивана виднее. Секретные гугловские спутниковые снимки?
Stranger_I (2023-09-06 16:19:55+00:00): Отличить тропу от дороги сумею. Поэтому и написал, что проходил по ДОРОГАМ. Хотя может тебе с дивана виднее. Секретные гугловские спутниковые снимки?
jtracey (2023-09-05 06:14:24+00:00): Resolves https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3867965
jtracey (2023-09-05 06:19:38+00:00): Resolves https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3871967
NorthCrab_upload (2023-09-05 06:31:27+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Generała Sikorskiego":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11168841089
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11168841090
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11168841091
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11168841092
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11168841093
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11168841094
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11168841097
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11168841105
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11168841106
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11168841107
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11168841108
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11168841109
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11168841110
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11168841111
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11168841112
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11168841113
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11168841114
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11168841115
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11168841116

"Kostrzewskiego":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11168841099

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
lost paradise (2023-09-05 07:04:39+00:00): I am very new to this map. Can someone please review the change?

Thank you
lost paradise (2023-09-06 03:41:40+00:00): Why is the restaurant still showing as "Valhalla" when zoomed out, but changes to "Lost Paradise" when zoomed in? 
(The correct name that was updated is Lost Paradise)
adiatmad (2023-09-06 07:34:09+00:00): Hello, hello, It should take time to update each zoom level
(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Featured_tile_layers/Updates)
lost paradise (2023-09-05 07:05:49+00:00): I'm very new to how this works. Will somebody please be so kind as to review this edit and approve it?
ikopanjirukmana (2023-09-06 02:12:44+00:00): Hello, and thank you for your contribution. I've already reviewed your work, and it's all excellent! Only a minor suggestion from me, if you build a barrier, don't let buildings overlap with it or share nodes with it, and make sure your buildings is always square.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140833710
eggie (2023-09-05 07:37:09+00:00): Hoi.. Nee foot =designated hoeft niet op een wandelpad.. 
Kwaad kan het overigens niet. Het is overbodig. 
Je kunt wel toevoegen evt. 
traffic_sign=NL:G7



Groet
eggie
eggie (2023-09-05 07:40:12+00:00): Wwellicht heb je wat aan deze wiki waar je de noodzakelijke accesstags icm de bebording kunt vinden.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=NL:Overzicht_Nederlandse_Verkeersborden&direction=next&oldid=984258#C:_Geslotenverklaring
mapse
eggie
oba510 (2023-09-05 06:50:48+00:00): This was still here about 5 hours ago...
mpatsevich_lyft (2023-09-05 10:20:37+00:00): Hi, oba510
My name is Marina, and I am a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. Thank you so much for paying attention to this. 
When removing the barrier, we used Lyft-owned sources: Nearmap background, telemetry data, and street-level images. The road is drivable according to our telemetry data  - https://drive.google.com/file/d/1uJFvXWHiiuFXwfZFJyGceWvKipUKCnmt/view?usp=drive_link.  According to the image (photo taken from Ellsworth Street, 37.867828, -122.263685) - https://drive.google.com/file/d/1oyMZGIQupiaP0e7gAhj8yNbN1n3Ck7yh/view?usp=drive_link,
there is a barrier only on one lane and not on the entire road, and it doesn’t interfere with the traffic of cars. According to the OSM wiki, a barrier is a physical structure that blocks or impedes movement - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:barrier#:~:text=A-,barrier%20is%20a%20physical%20structure%20which%20blocks%20or%20impedes%20movement,-.%20The%20barrier%20tag. It seems  that it’s better not to add a barrier on this section of the road, since one of the lanes is entirely accessible to traffic and the presence of a barrier may prevent navigation through this section of the road.
Best regards,
Marina
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2023-09-21 17:00:52+00:00): Hvad er Vandmynten for noget?
osmviborg (2023-09-21 18:08:38+00:00): Hvad tror du selv? https://vis.dataforsyningen.dk/navngivneveje/84fa83ab-6061-4a9a-a7c9-559aa0b9c18d?vispopup=true&kort=Sk%C3%A6rmkort
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2023-09-21 21:58:38+00:00): Tak, jeg var faktisk ikke sikker.
Det kunne have været en sti eller et blomsterbed eller sådan noget.
osmviborg (2023-09-22 07:06:11+00:00): 👍
literan (2023-09-05 17:25:48+00:00): по ПДД по проезжей части ходить пешком запрещено, если есть тротуары. Так что я верну тег foot=no (не надо его менять на неверный foot=yes)
eggie (2023-09-05 07:49:28+00:00): Commentaar moet zijn accesstags toegevoegd
spughetti (2023-09-05 18:00:33+00:00): Hi Stileo, I was just looking over some of your edits and wanted to make a few suggestions.

Please make sure that any crossings you create are connected to the roads they cross, and connect them to sidewalks on each end. Please also try not to make sidewalks cross other features such as buildings. If a sidewalk does actually go under a building iD will give you a suggestion to mark it as lower.

Feel free to reach out if you have any questions!
eggie (2023-09-05 14:49:02+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 
MVG, 
Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
Carto'Cité (2024-01-04 16:01:02+00:00): Bonjour Romy G,
Tu as ajouté ces deux pistes :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1205148035
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1205148036
Mais elles sont en doublon avec des éléments qui les décrivaient déjà :
Ce trottoir https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/229081358 faisait bien office de piste avec les informations qu'il portait.
Et ce trottoir est encore interprétable comme une piste :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/161690708
Je pense que iD n'est pas adapté pour identifier les aménagements cyclables dans cette situation et à moins d'utiliser le rendu CyclOSM et raffraichir régulièrement, tu ne peux pas bien voir les aménagements. Je te conseille d'essayer JOSM et le rendu cyclable pour ça (https://github.com/Cartocite/MapCSS-JOSM-Bicycle).
Je fais quelques modifications et n'hésite pas à me contacter si tu as des remarques :)
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
NorthCrab_upload (2023-09-05 08:10:22+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8261749320
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/216928128

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
aceman444 (2024-08-11 11:56:36+00:00): Zase nejake pokusy? Dufam, ze ste tam boli, kedze zase ziadne zdroje.
Pan (2023-11-20 01:27:28+00:00): What is the Dingerie? Is it really a religious object?
habi (2026-03-17 10:04:30+00:00): Removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179996089
DP24PH (2023-09-08 04:24:25+00:00): Thank you very much for taking down a vandalized map within SM Dasmariñas, and we will take action against the suspected vandal.


DP24
wambacher (2023-09-09 09:25:00+00:00): Hi, scön dass ihr eure daten aktuell haltet. Nur sollte man dann auch den Knoten an die richtige Stelle verschieben.

Hab das mal gemacht (-->Petersfeld), kenne aber dort die Hausnummern nicht. Daher hab ich den Knoten mitten im Twisterlingsbogen "geparkt"

Bitte verschieben und evtl die fehlenden Hausnummern nachtragen
Gruß
walter
burrscurr (2023-09-05 16:08:18+00:00): Hi Schaf@GDI,

thanks for your contribution to OSM! Your changes are fine. On satellite imagery, it looks like both streets don't have actual lane markings. In this case, it can make sense to be more explicit by using lane_markings=no in combination with width=... (see wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lanes#No_lane_markings). You may consider updating the tags, if that's more fitting for the local situation.

Cheers, burrscurr
eggie (2023-09-05 14:52:49+00:00): Dag Femke.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dbus_trap

Wellicht moped en mofa=yes erbij. 

MVg
eggie
LockOnGuy (2023-09-05 13:57:35+00:00): Muhammad Faiq Kalhury, you have broken boundaries, Can you fix it?     
If you want help fixing it, let me know.    
Regards.
eggie (2023-09-05 14:54:01+00:00): 140838998












Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 

feedback  Lijkt me correct
MVG, 
Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
KKiesVRFR (2023-09-06 05:54:55+00:00): Bedankt,
Mvg Karst
gscscnd (2023-09-20 07:24:39+00:00): Wiesz może od kiedy ma być jednokierunkowa? Aktualnie nie jest.
Tomek | Yanosik (2023-09-21 08:40:57+00:00): Cześć, jeżeli aktualnie nie jest to na razie zmieniam. Może była jednokierunkowa przez krótki czas. Dzięki za komentarz!
arjunaraoc (2024-01-06 02:18:42+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140839586
hieuvan (2023-09-15 00:55:45+00:00): Đề nghị bạn làm bản đồ khớp với thực tế và sử dụng các thẻ theo đúng ý nghĩa của nó.
danieldegroot2 (2023-09-06 10:33:46+00:00): Hey eireidium,

In the Kilkenny city area itself, Bing is less defined and more misaligned compared to Esri Clarity and regular Esri (which is newer and easier to align with Esri Clarity). Compare also with the war office map. I would suggest checking your edits for any errors, like skewing the angle of buildings, drawing non-existing building parts, etc..
If you continue to use Bing in this area, please make sure you are using the other layers to verify.

Regards,

Daniel
eireidium (2023-09-07 20:08:37+00:00): Thanks Daniel. Much appreciated. Yeah my first dip in KK and I didn't compare well between the available imagery. Yes, BING was quite out of alignment to the roadways and went with those but ended up with the big offset. Tried to clean up the mess I made there with the ESRI clarity. Thanks.
eggie (2023-09-05 14:57:39+00:00): Welkom bij OSM ..
Wellicht hier even kijken. Alleen een naam doet niet veel in osm.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:healthcare%3Dphysiotherapist
MVG
eggie