piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-21 18:14:02+00:00): Hi Defaulter,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Thanks for updating the name of this village to apparently the correct name.

However, it seems you inexplicably set the place=* tag of what you confirm is in fact a village from the correct "village" to the invalid value "yes", which means the village with the name you just corrected will no longer appear on the map at all.

Therefore, I fixed this issue for you in changeset 186132254

https://osm.org/changeset/186132254

Additionally, I'm not sure what you mean by

> Please merge the duplicate entry and retain only "Kilhauda" on Google Maps.

You are on the OpenStreetMap website, not Google, so we have nothing to do with Google Maps. If you want something changed on Google Maps, you'd need to deal with them.

Thanks, and happy mapping.
mewhenthe (2026-07-21 04:59:24+00:00): I don't think County Road 213 extends into Texas Materials. Is there signage indicating as such?
no details provided here (2026-07-22 07:45:58+00:00): Hi John - I've got some further details on this building which is split into maisonettes. Do you have any more mapping for this street? I did some work recently sorting the spiky buildings round here. See my DMs. Happy to work with you, cheers.
JJIglesias (2026-07-21 06:20:27+00:00): Muchas gracias por tu aporte y excelente que tengas el conocimiento local, para el status de las vias en Camiri. Las vias highway=Residential y highway=Unclassified, NO deben tener al mismo tiempo colocada la etiqueta Tracktype que es solo para vias de acceso agrícola/forestal marcadas con la etiqueta highway=track. Ya borre varias de esas tracktype de las varias calles, pero si te encuentras mas solo borralas porque estan mal utilizadas,  solo recuerda NO borrarlas en las vias tipo Track.

Si deseas contribuir con fotos desde tu celular te sugerimos utilizar la Aplicación #MAPILLARY que sube fotos directamente para ser utilizadas en este mapa. Puedes subir todas las fotos que gustes tipo streeview.

Gracias nuevamente por tu aporte y estamos a la Orden

Slds. JJ
JJIglesias (2026-07-21 06:28:13+00:00): Te sugerimos usar en esa zona las imagenes satelite de ESRI y NO de Bing. Ademas recuerda que las imágenes satélites son angulares NO verticales.

Por favor activa la opción ISSUES en el panel derecho de tu editor, para q te aparezcan tus errores, si los hubiera

Gracias
JJIglesias (2026-07-21 06:50:53+00:00): Por cierto en estas Coordenadas 
-20.08747 -63.55530

Hay hartos tracks para trazar que NO estan en el mapa (Imagenes Esri)
felipeeugenio (2026-07-21 14:41:24+00:00): Hola. Buenísimas las ediciones. Eso sí, por favor revisarlas en el link que se genera automáticamente abajo de mi comentario. Ahí podrá visualizarlas de manera más didáctica, y en donde se ve claramente que varias como que están en diagonal a la calle. 

Quizás realmente están así, pero de que se ve raro, se ve raro.

Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186093147
Baloo Uriza (2026-07-21 13:40:49+00:00): Seems odd that it's tagged secondary south of 71st, when it definitely seems more like a tertiary.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186093834
felipeeugenio (2026-07-21 14:37:44+00:00): Hola: traffic_sign:direction= es para semáforos. Para signos pare y ceda el paso se usa solo direction=

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186094543
FajrAl (2026-07-22 14:41:21+00:00): Hi, please use Esri imagery, there is clearly a marketplace here
s777n (2026-07-21 08:33:12+00:00): Здравствуйте. Не нужно писать слова-категории формата "столовая" или "продукты" в имя. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Названия#Имя_–_это_название_и_только Исправил
ReScQ (2026-07-21 09:49:06+00:00): Ist bicycle=yes hier überhaupt richtig?
Nach der Grünanlagensatzung der Stadt München ist das Radfahren außerhalb der für diesen Zweck ausgeschilderten Wege und Flächen untersagt.
https://stadt.muenchen.de/rathaus/stadtrecht/vorschrift/810.html
FajrAl (2026-07-22 14:39:27+00:00): Hi! Please avoid mapping fragmented/overly small buildings on low-res imagery. Only digitize clear buildings. If the imagery is too blurry, please mark "The imagery is bad" in the HOT Task. Thanks!
Marvk (2026-07-21 13:57:26+00:00): Hi WIldsharky, I agree with restoring the deleted way, however, did you read the intentions of the previous user? The ways were modified by a government agency with the note that they are inside a protected area and that access is forbidden here by law, see https://www.nlwkn.niedersachsen.de/naturschutzgebiete/verordnung-zum-naturschutzgebiet-hohenstein-44120.html

I have restored the access restrictions and the description in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186117519
Wildsharky (2026-07-27 05:54:36+00:00): Hi Marvk, 
thank you for making the corrections and for the tip! Now I better understand the intention of the contributor. I’ll make sure to note down and consider the situation if I happen to revisit this area.
in2itivity (2026-07-21 06:59:57+00:00): Hi there, I ended up deleting this barrier as it wasn't very accurate to begin with - I will admit that I jumped the gun by plotting the barrier based on Broadway Subway's published access diagrams, which didn't turn out to be accurate.
The real barrier is considerably longer and it might have extended all the way to Yukon. Hopefully this could get checked and updated soon!
keithonearth (2026-07-21 16:40:20+00:00): Deleting it seems reasonable. I walked through the area, and took notes, to update the map when I got home, and discovered that you'd already made all the changes I'd been planing to do.

I didn't make notes about the barrier though, so was just trusting my memory.
Jordi MF (2026-07-21 21:50:13+00:00): Hola tomcat83,

Por favor, no añadas el nombre de una carretera a las rotondas. Según la wiki, solo se les debe de poner nombre si la rotonda tiene una denominación exclusiva para sí misma (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Droundabout)
"Name tag:
Roundabout with individual name: name=Butlerstown roundabout
Only if the roundabout itself has a name, the name=* key is applied (such as John's Junction). It should not use the name of a road it connects. If the roundabout does not have an individual name, the name=* tag is not used."

Saludos
drkt (2026-07-21 10:19:36+00:00): Are we allowed to use this source?
Tinetto (2026-07-24 15:31:48+00:00): Hi Drkt, the source cited is an internal source available to TomTom’s organised editing team members. Mention of its use is documented at Organised Editing/Activities/TomTom - OpenStreetMap Wiki, under the data sources section. 

Thank you for your inquiry. Please let me know if any further clarification is necessary.
pnorman (2026-07-21 17:48:00+00:00): Hello,
uber said they were stopping sidewalk editing in London, only fixing existing incorrect edits. This is a bunch of new mapping.
Gangadi Anusha (2026-07-22 01:27:34+00:00): Hi Pnorman,
Thank you for your concern.
In this case, I did not add any new sidewalk roads. The sidewalk was already present, but it was disconnected and the connectivity was missing. So i connected the existing segment to reflect the on-the-ground situation and improve the existing mapping.
From my perspective, this was a correction to existing data rather than new sidewalk mapping. If you believe there is a better approach, I would be happy to review it and make any necessary changes.
Thank you,
Anusha Gangadi
eggie (2026-07-21 07:28:18+00:00): Hoi,

Het zijn maar twee rijstroken dus
 left|through;right

Ik heb het aangepast. 

MVG
eggie
topolusitania (2026-07-21 16:34:39+00:00): Si no estas de acuerdo com meadow, propone una alternativa. No borres!
Gravel ? Grassland ? Scrub ? Sand ?
 Si hayau m error  no se borra, se corrige !
pitscheplatsch (2026-07-21 07:31:06+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM. 

This edit adds a name to a node that is a junction shared by two residential roads.

The name tag should record the real-world name of the mapped object, rather than advertise or describe a nearby business. If the company is located here, please map it as a separate point or building. 

For now, the name on this node should be removed. 

Thank you.
eggie (2026-07-21 07:38:23+00:00): Dag Nomad.. Staat hier een C14 bord?
Zoniet gebruik dan bicycle=use_sidepath

De vervolgwegen zij n ook allemaal use_sidepath.
Het effect is hetzelfde, maar er is een juridisch verschil.
Er is wellicht geen fietsverbod, maar fietsers horen het fietspad te volgen. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bicycle%3Duse_sidepath

MVG
egie
eggie (2026-07-21 07:41:43+00:00): Ik heb het aangepast. Wanneer er een bord staat wit rode rand met fiets geef dan even een seintje. Dan draai ik het terug.
MVG
eggie
Nomad_239 (2026-07-21 08:22:02+00:00): Hey eggie, ik ben vrij nieuwe hier. Sorry als ik het niet goed in vul. De bedoeling is goed bedoeld. Waar kan ik meer meer inlezen op het beter verwerken van nieuwe info?
Nomad_239 (2026-07-21 08:26:00+00:00): En er staat trouwens geen C14 bord in die straat.  Bij de nieuwe fietspaden staat wel een G11 bord aan het begin van de Eindhovenseweg als je vanuit Eersel Steensel binnen komt fietsen
eggie (2026-07-21 08:42:49+00:00): Oke.. dan staat het nu goed met use_sidepath.
Ik had het aangepast. In het begin kun je zulke dingen niet weten. Er wordt je niets kwalijk genomen.
Een paar weken terug heb je een welkomstbericht gehad .. daarin staan links naar de wiki en waar je op 'moet' letten.
Als je die niet meer hebt geef maar een seintje.
OSM kent wel een steile leercurve.
Een bankje plaatsen is simpel maar de routering bewerken is direct lastig in het begin.
Neus ook maar eens rond op het forum van osm.
Mapse,
eggie
Nb ook ooit beginner..
KKS (2026-07-21 13:21:24+00:00): Вітаю. На основі чого надано користування ділянкою як кладовище коли по факту це є ліс?
OneMoreSCAccount (2026-07-21 13:36:22+00:00): По факту це і кладовище і ліс

https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/546-2001-%D0%BF#Text
KKS (2026-07-22 11:17:00+00:00): "на місці масових захоронень  жертв" = Державного 
історико-меморіального   заповідника. Заповідника.
З а п о в і д н и к а!!! . Не стоврити КЛАДОВИЩЕ, а стоврити ЗАПОВІДНИК. ВІдчуваєте різницю?
Наближчим часом прошу повернути статус до відповідності рішення і не приймати самовільних рішень на власний розсуд
OneMoreSCAccount (2026-07-22 11:23:06+00:00): Я категорично не згоден з вами. Це місце поховань, яке одночасно має статус заповідника. Тому landuse=cemetery тут треба. Прошу більше не скасовувати мої зміни на власний розсуд без встановлених процедур. Підіть і перевірте ногами
OneMoreSCAccount (2026-07-22 11:25:36+00:00): До речі Лук'янівське кладовище так само має статус історико-меморіального заповідника і від цього не перестає бути кладовищем
KKS (2026-07-22 13:04:00+00:00): Полетіла скарга в DWG
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-21 17:50:47+00:00): Hi Formosa Topo,

Use of Google Maps as a source is strictly prohibited by both OSM and Google policies, and may be a violation of the law -- see https://osm.wiki/Google for more details.

Additionally, it is a good idea to discuss removal of tags other mappers added with those mappers first, before reverting the change.

I reverted this changeset sourced from Google Maps for now in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/186130974
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-21 17:55:43+00:00): If you still believe these tags should be removed (based on your own independently sourced information), you should give the original mapper @kelvin1130 the chance to explain why they added them and come to a consensus about the change. I've pinged them on their changeset and via DM to give them a chance to do so. Thanks, and happy mapping!
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-21 18:00:25+00:00): Hi Formosa Topo,

Use of Google Maps as a source is strictly prohibited by both OSM and Google policies, and may be a violation of the law -- see osm.wiki/Google for more details.

Additionally, it is a good idea to discuss removal of tags other mappers added with those mappers first, before reverting the change.

Furthermore, most these tags removed appear unrelated to whether or not this is a train station, and still relevant to it as an attraction.

Therefore, I reverted this changeset sourced from Google Maps for now in changeset 186131636

https://osm.org/changeset/186131636

If you still believe the station tags specifically should be removed (based on your own independently sourced information), you should give the original mapper @EMU800 the chance to explain why they added them and come to a consensus about the change. I've pinged them on their changeset and via DM to give them a chance to do so. Thanks, and happy mapping!
ivanbranco (2026-07-21 13:50:42+00:00): Ciao Francoerbi41,

hai cancellato due aree residenziali ai lati di Via Carlo Gianotti. Come mai? Non sono aree residenziali?
EfreetSK (2026-07-21 08:29:03+00:00): *crossings
HurricaneGator (2026-07-23 18:13:27+00:00): Hello melo_1! I noticed in this changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186102500 you added destination=Craiova;Tg. Jiu;Petroșani to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/848643657. I wasn’t able to find a viewport for that angle in Bing Streetside from May, 31 2020 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=id#map=19/45.469404/23.173716). Would you be willing to share the source you used for this update? If you have access to more recent ground-level imagery or photos, would you be willing to upload them to an OSM-compatible platform such as Mapillary or KartaView (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Street-level_imagery_services)? That would allow other contributors to verify and reference the signage as well. The OSM wiki states that destination key “is only for values which are explicitly indicated on signposts or ground writings.” as seen in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:destination#Value. I’m happy to help make these adjustments, but wanted to ensure you are aware of the OSM Wiki guidance on destination tagging.
rarad74 (2026-07-23 19:47:10+00:00): The guy passed by there and saw them with his own eyes. They even appear on Google Street View but i cannot share de link beacuse of copyright rules. However, there is no rule prohibiting the addition of a major city located along that route and in that direction. So please ease up on that authoritative tone—after all, you aren't in your own country. Thanks.
HurricaneGator (2026-07-29 15:39:28+00:00): Thank you for the clarification rarad74 and I appreciate your update here.
assanges (2026-07-21 11:18:01+00:00): EDIT: correct `source_ref` should be
https://av.sc.com/tw/content/docs/%E6%B8%A3%E6%89%93%E9%8A%80%E8%A1%8C%E7%92%B0%E5%8C%97%E5%88%86%E8%A1%8C%E6%A5%AD%E5%8B%99%E7%A7%BB%E8%BD%89%E5%85%AC%E5%91%8A.pdf
assanges (2026-07-21 08:47:01+00:00): oh sauce: https://av.sc.com/tw/content/docs/Branch_Announcement_Sep22.pdf
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-21 17:06:05+00:00): Thanks for cleaning up the SEO spam of the previous account (not sure if affiliated with you or some other SEO company). I did some minor additional cleanup in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/186128692
Bienson (2026-07-21 23:32:54+00:00): Hier ist kein Parkplatz. Die Autos parken auf der Straße. Vorher war hier die vergrößerte Straßenfläche eingetragen. Nun nicht mehr.
Grundstückszufahrten sind service=driveway.
Mond00 (2026-07-22 06:07:21+00:00): korrigiert
nevw (2026-07-21 14:11:13+00:00): Hi, you need to map the house shape. I see you have instead added the property outline and tagged that as a house. Can you zoom in close and change those to reflect the house shape thanks.
nevw (2026-07-21 14:19:10+00:00): I’ll fix this
Klue17 (2026-07-21 14:38:53+00:00): Actually my house shape is a rectangle.  Check out Google street view.
nevw (2026-07-21 15:06:31+00:00): Yes, I left as a rectangle and just unattached the nodes at the front from the residential boundary and shifted them back across the parked cars in your driveway to be aligned with the front of the house. I only changed the #44 buildings as all the others look good. Cheers.
pitscheplatsch (2026-07-22 07:29:47+00:00): #Spam
NeisRevert (2026-07-23 15:47:20+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/186242567
Comment: "Remove spam"
pitscheplatsch (2026-07-22 07:29:54+00:00): #Spam
NeisRevert (2026-07-23 15:47:48+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/186242600
Comment: "Remove spam"
nyanpsyche (2026-07-22 01:44:18+00:00): This is the old alignment and is incorrect as of the opening of the new intersection earlier this year
PedestrianMapping_AtlasCloak (2026-07-22 09:15:12+00:00): Thank you for pointing this out. I have updated the data accordingly and will take extra care to ensure similar issues are avoided
Stalker61 (2026-07-21 20:00:48+00:00): Добрый вечер. По еакому праву перенесен тег ПСЧ-132 с полигона на здание. Будет это база данных МЧС делай , что хочешь. А сейчас верни все назад. Это OSM и здесь свои правила тегирования закрепленные в пользовательских соглашениях.
Букин Даниил (2026-07-21 20:09:31+00:00): Добрый вечер. Я только изменил название. Если что-то нарушил, прошу прощения. Мне нужно время, что-бы разобраться с правилами.
JeroenHoek (2026-07-21 10:30:58+00:00): Bij een franchise gaat de ketennaam in `brand` niet `operator`.
Puntertje (2026-07-21 12:30:23+00:00): Scherp, bedankt
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-21 18:06:13+00:00): Hi,

Use of Google Maps as a source is strictly prohibited by both OSM and Google policies, and may be a violation of the law--see https://osm.wiki/Google for more information.

Furthermore, your tagging here does not appear to make much sense--you've tagged a closed way as both a linear footway and a man_made=bridge structure, that doesn't connect to any other pedestrian infrastructure, and with a name that doesn't make much if any sense as a name=* under OSM rules.

Therefore, I've had to revert the change in source=* of Google Maps, in changeset 186131892:

https://osm.org/changeset/186131892

Please only re-add this if you can independently verify the presence of this bridge via in person survey (or allowable imagery is updated) and you understand how to correctly tag a pedestrian bridge (either as a structure, a linear way or both but as separate objects). 

Thanks, and happy mapping.
baksimodadeden (2026-07-24 06:25:19+00:00): https://maps.app.goo.gl/wGZUjWGqrpNDCjH88 this is the proof for you
Fraxi (2026-07-24 08:35:22+00:00): Proof or not, we don't have right to use data from Google maps. The different image providers for OSM(MAF, Esri, Bing) renew their images from time to time. When the imagery is updated, someone might add the bridge.
Fraxi (2026-07-24 10:45:31+00:00): @baksimodadeden, 
sorry if I am boring and was biting, but it's fine to learn OSM basics for mapping on wiki.openstreetmap.org
CAM-Gerlach (2026-07-24 18:50:35+00:00): @Fraxi FWIW your comment was polite, helpful and constructive and I appreciate you chiming in; I didn't find it "biting" at all (not sure what you mean by "boring", I suspect I'm missing something in translation here), while also being to the point. If I'd been commenting I probably would have been even more direct, given they'd completely ignored previous comments--I'm not sure what they could have found unclear about:

> Use of Google Maps as a source is strictly prohibited by both OSM and Google policies, and may be a violation of the law.
topolusitania (2026-07-21 11:01:55+00:00): Hola
Porque estas borrando los paneles individuales ?
Borrar algo que esté correto es prohibido en OSM
topolusitania (2026-07-21 11:04:30+00:00): Si no estas de acuerdo com meadow, propone una alternativa. No borres!
Gravel ? Grassland ? Scrub ? Sand ?
No se si has llegado a OSM. Al menos que haya um error muy fuerte, no se borra, se corrige !
bxl-forever (2026-07-21 13:00:50+00:00): Hello,

Thanks for editing the map.  However, please always make sure to upload your changes in an area *before* moving to another part of the map.

This changeset contains edits near Caldecott (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23019437)… and a road in Turkey (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25705231).

The recommended way is like this: edit one area, then upload your changes. And only after you have uploaded it, start editing roads in the other country. This will make sure that your edits are shown to the other mappers around the place you are editing. This changeset unfortunately shows as a giant bounding box covering most of Europe.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Hope this helps. 😉
Happy mapping.
bxl-forever (2026-07-21 13:08:22+00:00): Correct link to the first example in Caldecott (Oxfordshire): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23019437

(The link in the first message was broken because the website, which automatically creates hyperlinks, had incorrectly concatenated it with punctuation marks.)
Alshowaiey (2026-07-22 16:31:23+00:00): why did you chose to delete instead of fixing it
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186105348
Flamen_Sru (2026-07-23 09:12:09+00:00): Hi Alshowaiey, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you.
Flamen_Sru (2026-07-24 15:29:32+00:00): Hi Alshowaiey, thank you for getting in touch. Based on the most recent satellite imagery, I interpreted the situation as the road does not exist anymore and the current layout as temporary tracks within a construction area. Please let me know if you have other suggestions.
literan (2026-07-22 19:08:34+00:00): это реально общедоступные инструменты для ремонта?
Wildsharky (2026-07-23 06:17:24+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186166892
VictorIE (2026-07-22 17:56:17+00:00): Hi,

Welcome to OSM.

Thank you for the contributions around Rush. I had done a fair bit of mapping there about a 18 months ago, but had difficulty completing some mapping because of lack of higher quality imagery.
docschenk (2026-07-23 11:27:11+00:00): Ist nicht dein Ernst, oder? Bist du die Sittenpolizei, oder was? Was habe ich deiner großartigen Meinung nach denn jetzt schon wieder falsch gemacht?
jengelh (2026-07-23 12:37:54+00:00): Lies einfach die verlinkte Wikipage. Die konzentriert die Argumente, die sonst in knappen Changeset-Beschreibungen und Forenposts untergehen, nochmal ganz konkret.
user_8655426 (2026-07-24 12:40:14+00:00): こんにちは。
この変更セットで追加されたいくつかの建物に、start_date=0001 が付与されています。
https://osmcha.org/changesets/186107213

金沢市内の一部の建物を調べてみましたが、以下の変更セットでも start_date=0001 が使用されています。
https://osmcha.org/changesets/185531423
https://osmcha.org/changesets/185546889
https://osmcha.org/changesets/186243194

PLATEAU が原因だと思われますが、データのご確認をお願いいたします。
Wish_F (2026-07-26 15:58:24+00:00): こんにちは。
RapiD_Plateauが原因のようで、start_date=0001 が入力される件については報告をしています。
入力された際に消すようにしていますが、漏れがあったと思います。
ありがとうございます。
nyampire (2026-07-27 10:35:13+00:00): この件、0001値の報告は以前にいただいていたのですが、エディタ側の対応が遅れてしまいすみません。

ひとまず、start_date=0001の場合はRapidで表示されないように修正しました。（9999など、他のハズレ値はなさそうです）

Overpassで状況を確認したところ、JOSMでの通常インポートでもこの事象があったようで、まとめて修正対応する予定です。
nyampire (2026-07-27 12:34:53+00:00): 消しておきました。

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186452509
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186454104
Dawid2849 (2026-07-21 10:38:40+00:00): Ups, przez przypadek wrzuciłem niedokończone zmiany
topolusitania (2026-07-21 11:00:11+00:00): Hola
Porque estas borrando los paneles individuales ?
Borrar algo que esté correto es prohibido en OSM
kubahahaha (2026-07-21 15:06:26+00:00): Cześć, dlaczego tu jest zakaz wjazdu i wejścia?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/297018010
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1389294813
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1541258211
DMarTrail42 (2026-07-21 17:25:09+00:00): Cześć, to jest teren prywatny. Z północy wejścia ma brama a z południa jest znak że to jest teren prywatny. Nie mieszkam tutaj ale mogę dodać zdjęcie.
kubahahaha (2026-07-21 17:42:56+00:00): Nie trzeba, zmieniłem na access=private - czyli dostęp dla jakiejś grupy ludzi. access=no to całkowity zakaz dostępu (jakieś remonty, uszkodzone drogi, tereny całkowicie zamknięte z innych powodów).
Dzięki!
DMarTrail42 (2026-07-21 19:52:00+00:00): Nie wiedziałem, dziękuję!