piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-03-14 21:57:07+00:00): The imagery used is outdated.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163610562
eggie (2025-03-14 14:48:09+00:00): Welkom bij OSM.

Adres nummer 2 is ergens anders.
Is dit wel het juiste gebouw?
Adresnodes zijn al aanwezig om op bij te taggen.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-03-14 14:49:43+00:00): Aahh.. Ik kijk verkeerd.  De info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode 12

MVG
eggie
Serviceteam daarom (2025-03-14 14:58:02+00:00): Ah, geen probleem! Dank je wel voor het samenvoegen!
Marco Ubaghs (VRZL) (2025-03-14 13:46:59+00:00): Dezer situatie is nog steeds actueel: https://www.google.com/maps/@50.935171,6.0104393,3a,72.6y,287.54h,75.48t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1s0B5qumK4SN997moq4uMCVQ!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fcb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26pitch%3D14.520924199515065%26panoid%3D0B5qumK4SN997moq4uMCVQ%26yaw%3D287.5398332396104!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI1MDMxMS4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D
eggie (2025-03-14 14:51:18+00:00): Dag Marco  Wanneer dit een bussluis was dan was sump_buster juist wel de juiste tagging en niet bus_trap.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dsump_buster

MVG
eggie
Marco Ubaghs (VRZL) (2025-03-14 15:06:38+00:00): Oké, dan zal ik 'm aanpassen naar sump_buster.
eggie (2025-03-14 15:12:56+00:00): Het wordt ook wel door elkaar gebruikt... 
Maar er is nu een aparte tag voor landbouwsluis. 
Dat is dan zo'n carter-vernieler. (sump_buster) 
Groet
eggie
Marco Ubaghs (VRZL) (2025-03-14 15:17:57+00:00): Thnx voor de feedback.
❤️‍🔥 (2025-03-15 02:54:12+00:00): you've created a new bank but there is already one at this location: https://osm.org/way/871106997
Geo-Tobi (2025-03-23 19:57:20+00:00): vmicho, hör bitte auf, so einen Käse zu taggen! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/39575842
forestry=yes gibt es nicht, agricultural=yes ist Traktor frei und delivery=yes heißt "Lieferdienst wird angeboten". Du hast 16k Änderungen und solltest es wirklich besser wissen. Mach dich bitte nochmal schlau, im WIKI, und versuche es nochmal. Revert durchgeführt. Nutze das Verkehrszeichentool, wenn du unsicher bist. https://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/
AndresDuhour (2025-12-27 17:32:47+00:00): Buen día! corregí varias calles en las que se cambió el nombre completo por la abreviatura. Por ejemplo, Bulevar por Bv o Pasaje por Pje. Esta es la convención para OpenStreetMap sobre nombres. Cualquier duda podés consultar https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:name o sumarte al grupo de telegram. Saludos! Andrés
NorthCrab_upload (2025-03-14 14:31:05+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12662771178

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Andrea Musuruane (2025-03-15 13:49:34+00:00): Ciao. Questi non sono i nomi delle vie (che non hanno nome), sono i nomi delle località. Per favore smetti di inserirle sulle highway. Grazie, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163612378
Andrea Musuruane (2025-03-15 13:56:24+00:00): Fatto revert.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163651852
gscholz (2025-03-18 07:00:23+00:00): Hi HPBC,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=6.45883&lat=46.20951&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=163612619

As you may know, this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps. Can you please fix this?

You may also like to educate yourself about how to edit cycling routes properly:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cycle_routes

Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2025-05-25 08:43:06+00:00): Hi HPBC, 
this errors still exist. Can I get your feedback here?
Guido
gscholz (2025-07-17 06:07:12+00:00): Hi HPBC, 
due to your missing response, I have reverted this changeset to fix those issues.
Guido
Andrea Musuruane (2025-03-15 13:49:41+00:00): Ciao. Questi non sono i nomi delle vie (che non hanno nome), sono i nomi delle località. Per favore smetti di inserirle sulle highway. Grazie, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163612765
Andrea Musuruane (2025-03-15 13:56:25+00:00): Fatto revert.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163651852
domiden (2025-03-14 15:52:28+00:00): Should be: “… ("Kassel-Vorderer Westen").”
NorthCrab_upload (2025-03-14 15:01:13+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12662909199

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Berlin53 (2025-04-06 11:06:44+00:00): Mit der ref=751 wolltest du doch sicherlich die Einspeisung mappen und nicht die noch fehlende Weiche dicht daneben.
bahnpirat (2025-04-13 20:13:31+00:00): 753 ist (dem Aufbau der Zahl nach) die Nummer einer Weiche. Eine Einspeisung hätte nicht eine solche Nummer.
bahnpirat (2025-04-13 20:23:40+00:00): Ich musste das selber ncohmal prüfen. Dort wo die Weiche 751 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12662871775) eingezeichnet ist , befindet sich eine Weiche! Es ist die Weiche, welche das vom Tunnel kommende Überwechselgleis und das nördlichste Gleis südl. des S-Bahnofe vereinigt. Vorher führen zwei Schienenpaar durch die Kurve. Die Weiche ist nicht dieser Node: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10691172554 . Das sagte auch mein Kommentar, den du mit Version 7 entfernt hattest.
Berlin53 (2025-04-14 14:46:08+00:00): Ok, ich habe den Knoten https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12662871775 wieder zur Weiche gemacht und https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10691172554 gelöscht.
Ich war durch die Beschreibung deines Änderungssatzes etwas irritiert, zumal an dem Mast direkt daneben eine Einspeisung zu sehen ist. Um deinen Kommentar klarer zu machen und ihn auch grafisch umzusetzen, habe ich das Schienenpaar als zwei (fast) übereinanderliegende Wege dargestellt., sodass die Weiche nun nicht mehr auf einer durchgehenden Linie liegt. Vielleicht kannst du dir nochmals die Einspeisung ansehen. Ist nicht unbedingt mein Gebiet. Diese ist auch auf Mapillary zu sehen.
TheCornCollector (2025-03-14 14:58:35+00:00): Uiteraard bedoelde ik `natural=shrubbery`.
eggie (2025-03-14 15:17:08+00:00): Hi Zurg    Please no space in postcodeformat.
I fixed it.
Greetz,
eggie
Fizzie-DWG (2025-08-11 23:36:18+00:00): DWG revert - vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170316544
Frans S (2025-03-18 13:35:20+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
Please solve the issues shown by the issue triangle before you upload your mapping.
When a road or river continues on an adjacent task, please map that trace a bit over the edge of your task. Another mapper can then continue mapping. When you stop before the edge, The mapped trace will not be visible for the other mapper.
You did not tag the highway/waterway crossings, Mostly a ford.
Be sure you connected both waterway and highway when adding a crossing tag.
Best regards
domiden (2025-03-14 15:52:36+00:00): Should be: “… ("Kassel-Vorderer Westen").”
FroschForscher (2025-03-14 17:38:19+00:00): Hallo Hayta Hande,
ist das nicht eher eine Grundstückszufahrt?

FroschForscher
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163614241
Mathias_ADAV (2025-04-07 08:24:48+00:00): Bonjour, je viens de voir votre contribution sur Harnes, j'ai joint la voie verte à la route, sinon le routage ne peut pas se faire.
Filip009 (2025-03-15 11:56:17+00:00): Zdravím, o akú cyklotrasu sa jedná? https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18822617
JakubBernat (2025-03-15 15:18:12+00:00): Zdravím. Nový MTB trail. Vybudoval Zilina OKO trails
Filip009 (2025-03-15 17:05:31+00:00): Tak by som vás poprosil o pridanie názvu trailu, operátora, zmeniť route=bicycle za route=mtb na danej relácií https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18822617
Frans S (2025-03-17 13:35:51+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
Please solve the issues shown by the issue triangle before you upload your mapping.
You did not tag the crossings highway/waterway, Mostly a ford.
Best regards
Frans S (2025-03-17 13:42:06+00:00): When a waterway or highway continues over the edge of the task, please map it a bit over the border. The mapper who want to map the adjacent task see it and can continue.
Otherwise it is not visible  for him/here.
Best regards
FroschForscher (2025-03-14 17:42:52+00:00): Ich hab in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163620276 highway=primary an der Stuttgarter Straße wieder hinzugefügt.

Wenn das kein Versehen sondern Absicht (Baustelle, etc.) war bitte mit korrektem tagging wieder anpassen.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163614470
Herman Lee (2025-04-17 15:51:14+00:00): 长白码头已经弃用，请不要将删除的航线再添加回来，谢谢
Andrea Musuruane (2025-03-15 13:07:01+00:00): Ciao, Questo non è Brico OK ma Bricocenter. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163615640
Syl (2025-03-18 18:17:10+00:00): Bonjour, je viens de supprimer un des valideurs de billets (celui sur le quai le plus proche du bâtiment de la gare). Il n'existe plus.
eggie (2025-04-12 19:08:21+00:00): Dag C Batenburg Dit geeft een foutmelding.
width icm met max_width

Wat is nu de juiste waarde?

MVG,
eggie
eggie (2025-04-12 19:09:14+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/962556347
C Batenburg (2025-04-12 20:33:00+00:00): Hé Eggie, 
Waarschijnlijk heb ik dan een verkeerde tag gebruikt. De bedoeling is dat de width de daadwerkelijke breedte is, en max_width de maximaal toegestane breedte. Welke tag(s) had ik hiervoor dan moeten gebruiken?
eggie (2025-04-12 20:42:45+00:00): Het gaat hier dan over de toegangsbreedte van de wegversmalling.
Wat is die? 2m? 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxwidth

En staat dat aangegeven. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:width#Width_of_streets

De foutmelding is onwaarschijnlijk tagcombinatie op object.
Denk dat de breedte van de weg zelf op het wegelement hoort en niet op die node.
Kom je er zo uit?
Groet
eggie
eggie (2025-04-12 21:27:37+00:00): De wegbreedte is hier 4.70
De aangegeven wegbreedte van 2.50 heb ik van de choker gehaald.
Daar staat nu alleen nog die 2m.
Gr eggie
eggie (2025-04-12 21:33:32+00:00): Denk dat je deze tagging moet hebben
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxwidth:physical

Ik heb er maxwidth:physical=2 van gemaakt
dp7 (2025-03-14 17:39:47+00:00): Hello, the elevation was correct before:  this is not the main mountain, "Palazzo Borghese", but it's a secondary peak: the ele here is 2119 mt
vojtechzaboril (2025-03-14 18:00:55+00:00): Hi, thanks for explanation. It was caused by the wrong wikidata (Wd of the main peak), which confused me. I will fix it.
Regards
vojtechzaboril (2025-03-14 18:02:30+00:00): I see you already fixed it (also removed the wd). Thank you a lot.
V
NorthCrab_upload (2025-03-14 16:11:34+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12663014030

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2025-03-14 16:11:21+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12662771178

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Oier_ (2025-03-15 12:57:40+00:00): Hauxe egitera nentorren eta a ze poza eginda ikusi dudanean. Mila esker!
bbqman (2025-03-14 16:08:42+00:00): Also source: wikipedia and wikidata
Kovoschiz (2025-03-14 17:24:39+00:00): This was already discussed. It will be changed to `=primary` to the Sai Sha devleopment when Sierra Sea has population intake. Lok Wo Sha Ln and Nin Ming Rd doesn't justify a `=primary` yet.
Kovoschiz (2025-03-14 17:25:45+00:00): 2. MOS Rd has a fork with MOS Bypass. It continues, not being an entry or exit. Bypasses are usually considered forks, not using `=*_link` on the bypassed road.
小智智 (2025-03-14 17:49:57+00:00): In terms of the road network, isn't the bypass the main one, and the MOS to Road a fork from it? Only consider using the current network without taking any history into consideration please.
Kovoschiz (2025-03-15 08:53:06+00:00): No, I have never said anything about history. Please don't make guesses and assumptions. 
 MOS Bypass is forked from it, while it's configured as main route. Let's ignore the order if it's confusing.
The junction is a fork. MOS Rd continues down. So it doesn't need to be be a `highway=*_link`
小智智 (2025-03-15 09:03:10+00:00): My understanding of the road network is that MOS road is a fork from T7. The distance markers count consecutively from Ma On Shan Road upon leaving route 2, through the Ma On Shan Bypass and onto the Sai Sha Road. Similarly on the other end, Sai Sha Road into the town centre is a westbound fork from the T7 as well.
Kovoschiz (2025-03-15 09:30:48+00:00): As I said, let's not continue arguing which one is the fork of the other one. The junction is a fork, where a road continues on the other side. It's not only a slip road connecting with an interchange.
Kovoschiz (2025-03-15 09:35:55+00:00): I don't mean "fork" is a diverge. Sai Sha Rd westbound is special. To be precise, you have to travel through a section of the MOS Bypass first. Only the eastbound follows the old bypassed alignment directly.
gurglypipe (2025-03-14 18:26:40+00:00): Hiya, thanks for your edits to improve bike hire round the Lakes :)

Do you know exactly which building Marra are in now they’re in Nether Wasdale? It would be useful to position the node for them on the right building so people can go to the right place. Either edit the map to tweak its location, or let me know which building’s right, if you know. Thanks!
Lake District EM (2025-03-19 09:43:17+00:00): Hi Gurglypipe, thank you for checking, as you can probably tell I am new to this so useful to have your comments. I've put it I think on the main reception building as you come in - from my understanding they store the bikes in another building but meet people who have booked at the main reception. I'm going there on Monday so I'll double check.
gurglypipe (2025-03-19 11:42:30+00:00): No worries, there can be a bit of a steep learning curve to editing the map, so it’s appreciated that you’re putting the time in to improve it!

Is the main reception building the same one which has the campsite shop in (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/463401487)? Or the one next door which has the farm shop in (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/463401486)? Or a different one entirely? It’s been a few years since I was in Nether Wasdale so I can’t remember.

I agree it would make sense to have the bike hire node where they meet people for hire, rather than where the bikes are stored.

If you could make a note on Monday that would be grand :)
Lake District EM (2025-03-19 13:22:09+00:00): I think it is the camp site shop but I'll double check and put it right after that- thank you!
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-03-14 22:40:28+00:00): Reverted along with other changesets using old imagery.
Please don't add outdated information
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163616832
ZLima12 (2025-03-15 21:06:05+00:00): Hi,

I'm looking at the classification guidelines now, and it shows this road as primary south of Sunrise Highway. It does map to trunk for the section north to the Southern State Parkway, but I don't think that it is that much more important than the other section. Also, a driver can get between the two motorways using the Robert Moses Causeway, so there is already a trunk route covering this.
ZLima12 (2025-03-24 04:09:12+00:00): Since I haven't heard back, I am going to revert this for the time being. Note that the limited access nature of the road is already reflected in expressway=yes, which is independent of the classification. I don't think that the road is as important as the other motorways or trunks in the area, which is why I think primary is appropriate.

Also note this section from the national 2021 classification guidelines: "The Trunk classification generally should not be applied to highways that are parallel to motorways, especially highways within a short distance (less than 5 miles) from the motorway."
FlowerHillPerson (2025-03-24 14:26:12+00:00): Good morning,

Apologies for mt delayed response. 

I appreciate your explanation. Go ahead, just please make sure the added wooded areas aren't inadvertently deleted (I should have done those in a separate edit).

I sometimes find myself on the fence when it comes to whether a highway should be tagged as trunk or primary (even with the guidelines – sometimes it's in that "gray area," so-to-speak), and so I appreciate this feedback.
GerdP (2025-03-16 11:22:46+00:00): Zahlendreher: Radtour am 13.3.
NeisBot (2025-03-14 16:28:21+00:00): Hello Angelina Salazar, welcome to OSM, and thank you for your contributions!

I've taken a look at your recent edits and wanted to discuss a few discrepancies I noticed regarding the surrounding environmental features. Specifically, the locations in your edits don't seem to align with the typical geographical characteristics expected in that area. Here are some (max 10) relevant links to the edits:
https://osm.org/way/1367363461
https://osm.org/relation/18822836

Could you please take a look?
Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#Somewhere
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=163617147
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-03-14 21:35:20+00:00): reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163628173
A35K (2025-03-14 18:48:34+00:00): Vielleicht falscher Wert für den Website Tag, sollte das nicht eher zu operator=  ?
tcarlisle (2025-03-17 18:17:59+00:00): Astotes, looks like you are a new mapper.  Welcome to OSM.  We hope you'll have much to contribute. I've seen a few of your edits already and you have made some good additions. This edit, however, introduced some significant errors with the relationships.  I've fixed them, and some disconnected trails from another edit, but I did want to point that out so you can be aware of it as you continue to learn and map. There can be a steep learning curve to OSM, especially relationships.  If you have questions I'm happy to share what knowledge I have. Happy mapping.
meongseolin (2025-03-15 06:22:35+00:00): 麻烦你一个一个画吧；一干就画一大块就是石山
Glassman (2025-03-16 22:12:58+00:00): Please don't use descriptive names. Just tag the building as a building like you did. I removed the descriptive name tag.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163618002
NorthCrab_upload (2025-03-14 16:51:42+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1242472094

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Glassman (2025-03-16 22:14:58+00:00): did you mean landcover=grass? Glassland is more wild.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163618206
Lumikeiju (2025-03-15 18:25:42+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! :)

It's great to see you getting started contributing, and thanks for using the "Review Requested" feature!

I took a look at your edit, and it does need a bit of touching up - playgrounds are mapped with the tag "leisure=playground" rather than "leisure=park" + "name=Playground", so go ahead and update those tags by removing the existing two and adding the corrected one.

There's an OSM Wiki article on playground mapping here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dplayground

and I use TagFinder to help me figure out what the correct tags for a feature are: https://tagfinder.osm.ch/

Try to avoid "descriptive naming" (there's a very exhaustive explanation here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only)

Again, welcome - there's a lot of depth to OSM editing, and it'll take a while to learn the ins and outs - thanks for participating, and happy mapping!
rempshaener (2025-03-14 20:20:49+00:00): Hallo,

du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Ich habe nur eine Anmerkung: das Feld „note“ richtet sich vorrangig an andere Mapper. Beschreibungen für den Datenkonsumenten sind in „description“ besser aufgehoben.

Bei Fragen bitte melden.
Viele Grüße
Nathan_A_RF (2025-03-30 22:48:31+00:00): Hey, please remember to add maxspeed:type tags when adding maxspeed tags
Glassman (2025-03-16 22:16:00+00:00): #TIP: square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163618480
citrula (2025-03-14 21:37:15+00:00): Welcome to OSM. You added a point with no tags in this edit - I strongly recommend you do the tutorial built-in to the web editor
NieWnen (2025-03-14 17:24:35+00:00): Proszę rób zmiany na mniejszym obszarze, choćby powiatami dzieląc.
IreuN (2025-03-14 17:25:57+00:00): Już skończyłem, next time za pół roku powtórka, wybacz
NieWnen (2025-03-16 12:37:42+00:00): > Już skończyłem,

No nie do końca. Ponawiam prośbę. Choćby robić po jednym.

Jak nawet Ci się nie chcę myszką klikać na strzałkę, bo to cię spowalnia za bardzo, to możesz
otwierać okno wysłania przez ctrl+shift+strzałka w górę i 2 razy kliknąć enter :P
vasony (2025-03-18 20:27:11+00:00): Csak hogy meglegyen a hivatalos forrás, mert lemaradt:
Gárdony Város Önkormányzat Képviselő- testülete a gárdonyi 6329/33 hrsz-ú közútnak a. Galamb utca elnevezést adja
Térképszerkesztő (2025-03-26 11:42:40+00:00): Köszönöm!
ferog_v (2025-07-18 14:35:43+00:00): La carretera Carretera Querétaro - Irapuato (Libre) no pertenece a los Ejes de transporte, además corre paralela a la Carretera Querétaro - Irapuato (Cuota) que sí pertenece a los Ejes de transporte.

Vías Prinicpales (Trunk) forman parte de los ejes de transporte que establezca la SCT, igual o mayor a dos carriles y permiten la operación de todos los vehículos autorizados. Por lo general son de acceso restringido. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Mexico/Red_Nacional_de_Caminos#Clasificaci%C3%B3n_de_la_Red_Nacional_de_Caminos_[3][4]

https://datosviales2020.routedev.mx/main (Mapas temáticos -> Ejes de Transporte)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169113035
Marek-M (2025-03-15 09:38:31+00:00): Cześć, kiedyś chyba zwracałem Ci uwagę, żeby nie łączyć dróg z obszarami ale nadal tak robisz, co utrudnia późniejsze edycje. Czy mógłbyś przestać tak robić? Dodatkowo przydałoby się poprawić te wszystkie landuse, które już z drogami połączyłeś.