piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Taya_S (2025-05-06 07:40:26+00:00): Reverted locksmith SEO spam DWG Ticket#2025050610000165

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165878080
b-jazz (2025-04-23 05:35:43+00:00): fsdf?
b-jazz (2025-04-23 05:39:42+00:00): Can you please fix up https://osm.org/way/1120471967 and https://osm.org/way/1120471966 ? I'm not sure how they are supposed to be oriented from the change.
Arlo James Barnes (2026-01-27 04:37:22+00:00): done, this time with a more helpful changeset comment.
ilias_ (2025-04-09 23:59:25+00:00): Please save your changes before moving on to another area that's on the other side of the planet
luminousski (2025-04-19 12:55:09+00:00): Will do. Thanks!
NeisReview (2025-04-10 06:59:29+00:00): #HighwayChanges

Hello, welcome to OSM.

In this changeset, some types of highway are being added or modified by you. 

Could we know the sources that you used? Thank you.

More information about the changeset: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=164705175
OldManCelli (2025-05-15 16:47:10+00:00): adi04, you seem to be duplicating buildings that are already on the map. I see you are relatively new, so this is probably a mistake. I'm deleting the duplicates... but please review the wiki about adding buildings to the map. No need to duplicate geometries.
NeisReview (2025-04-10 07:07:27+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164705538
MassCartog (2025-04-09 15:02:04+00:00): Hi jellycat222, welcome to OSM! I noticed you have been adding houses and that's great. But on this changeset you removed a house that had address data and redrew it.

A better practice would be to modify the existing elements instead of deleting them and redrawing from scratch. This preserves the history and tags info.

Let me know if you want help fixing it.

See:
osm.wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history
jellycat222 (2025-04-09 16:08:22+00:00): Thank you for your help! I'll fix it now!
user_8655426 (2025-04-11 11:29:53+00:00): Thank you for fixing it.
(It was my mistake.)
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164706462
thetornado76 (2025-04-11 21:24:49+00:00): No problem, you're welcome :-)
fortera_au (2025-04-09 05:57:52+00:00): Hi, Andrew from the DWG here,

It looks like you were trying to upload some GPX traces into OSM as traces, but you’ve actually uploaded them directly into the map. 

Are these meant to be added directly, and if so, can you please tag them correctly?

If not, let me know if you need a hand removing them.

Thanks,
Andrew Welch
OSMF Data Working Group
cashwin111 (2025-04-09 06:16:31+00:00): Hello Andrew,

Yes, I meant to add them directly onto the map but not right now as did not tag them properly. Also, many of the route in this area are not aligned properly so I wanted to replace them. Is deleting the osm data and replacing it with mine not an option for me? I could not seem to find it. Let me know, so I can replace geometry in those parts and also upload my data as a whole with appropriate Tags.
fortera_au (2025-04-09 06:31:48+00:00): Hi cashwin111,

Usually on OSM we prefer to keep the histoy of data, so the best way to do this would be to upload the GPX files into an editor (iD and JOSM both definitely support this) and then use those to help you adjust the existing data.

Currently all the data you've uploaded has some across with a lot of invalid tags, so I'd definitely recommend those being removed and adjusting the existing data after that.
cashwin111 (2025-04-09 06:33:14+00:00): Hi andrew,

I used JOSM but forgot to use replace geometry just used the merge geom option. Thats why you saw those tags. Ill delete it and reup. Thanks.

Cashwin
fortera_au (2025-04-09 06:37:24+00:00): Not a problem, thanks for that!
cashwin111 (2025-04-09 06:38:59+00:00): Hello again,

To add to it, some routes have been discontinued and do not exist. If I delete in JOSM, they are deleted locally and finally what I upload will just merge into the existing OSM data on the web after all even if some parts that matched have been replaced. Sorry if this has been a nuisance to you, my company and I are looking to contribute thousands of data this month and hundreds of thousands this year. So, I wanted to be clear.

Also, to reiterate Ill delete the previous edit after we close this thread. Much Thanks.

cashwin
fortera_au (2025-04-09 06:41:59+00:00): Hi there,

If you're editing as part of an organisation, you'll need to be aware of the Organised Editing Guidelines [1].

With the edits themselves, I'd start by making sure you've pulled down what already exists in OSM, edit those, and then upload it. If you just add data to a blank JOSM workspace and upload it, it will only ever add new data, not replace any existing data.

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing/Guidelines
cashwin111 (2025-04-09 06:48:08+00:00): Thanks, I need help undoing the changes Ive made previously. Can you pull them down. Theres no undo option.
fortera_au (2025-04-09 06:53:11+00:00): Changeset reverted at request of mapper

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164708443
fortera_au (2025-04-09 06:53:41+00:00): I've reverted this changeset for you, so it's all been removed now.
BCNorwich (2025-04-10 18:11:03+00:00): Way: 1376031656 has been removed because it's mapping caused many duplication problems.
BCNorwich (2025-04-10 18:11:44+00:00): As well as causing all the warnings above.
NeisReview (2025-04-10 07:19:39+00:00): #NodeDragging

Hello, and welcome to OSM.

Thank you for contributing to the map. I’ve reviewed your recent edits and noticed that at least one node of a way was moved. This can sometimes happen unintentionally, and it’s led to some unusual intersections or overlaps between street segments and other map elements.

Could you kindly confirm whether these changes were intentional or if they may have been made by mistake?

Thank you, and I look forward to your response!
---
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11299503075
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/110262772
NeisReview (2025-04-10 07:04:00+00:00): #UnexplainedChanges

Hello, welcome to OSM.

Could you please clarify the purpose behind your map changes? It's not entirely clear from the edited data and your added description. Also, what was used as a source of your activity?

Looking forward to your response. 
Thank you.
Jordi MF (2025-04-09 11:06:49+00:00): Hola Martín,

Los nombres de partida, como la partida de l'Almaina no deben de ir en el nombre de una vía. Las partidas se añaden en un nodo con "place=locality"  "name=Partida de l'Almaina". Las partidas no suelen tienen un límite oficial definido, por eso usamos nodos.

En este caso, la partida de l'Alamina ya está mapeada: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1242135919, así como la urbanización: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11359371025

Saludos
旧加卷 (2025-04-09 07:07:00+00:00): 回退原因：使用扭曲的影像修改正确的公路位置；树林与公路节点粘连；可疑限速数据（例如福州南收费站不存在限速60km/h和20km/h的40km/h过度区间）；部分限速数据被删除。
试图进行相关讨论，但消息被忽视（7日未回复）。
回退使用多个变更集原因：precondition fail报错，无效变更集：https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164707478 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164707852
eggie (2025-04-09 07:30:44+00:00): Dag Johan,

Wanneer een paaltje uitneembaar is taggen we bollard=removable bij.
Ik heb het aangepast.. Paaltjes staan zelden op de kruising zelf. Ik heb het iets verplaatst.
MVG
eggie
aTarom (2025-04-09 07:39:59+00:00): Please do not add fake information live, use the test server, for more information
https://dev.openstreetmap.org/
NeisBot (2025-04-09 07:14:35+00:00): Hi yliguenes, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 99% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 21 natural(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=164709127
NeisReview (2025-04-09 16:45:10+00:00): Thank you for your private message and confirming that your deletions were intentional.
fortera_au (2025-04-10 12:59:07+00:00): Hi yliguenes,

Andrew from the Data Working Group here, are you able to share the reason for the deletions here, as some of the natural=wood ways do appear as dense tree areas from aerial imagery.

I'll also add, can you please make sure your changesets have a comment on them describing them?

Kind regards,
Andrew Welch, OSMF Data Working Group
NeisBot (2025-04-09 07:15:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment
NeisReview (2025-04-11 08:12:12+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/164803282
NeisBot (2025-04-09 07:15:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam
allen4names (2025-04-09 18:48:32+00:00): This edit should be reverted. Clearwater between Edison and Kellogg no longer appears on the map.
Glassman (2025-04-09 23:16:43+00:00): reverted - SEO Spam and poorly done
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164709196
TinPetreković (2025-04-09 07:34:03+00:00): Accidental node creation #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164709958
silversurfer83 (2025-04-09 15:54:44+00:00): Hi :)

du hast hier einigen highway=service ein allgemeines access=yes verpasst, was bedeutet, dass jede*r mit jedem Fahrzeug dort entlang darf. Auch über die Zufahrt auf dem Hof. Halte ich für unwahrscheinlich.

Gibt es irgendwo Schilder oder Poller? Vmtl. stehen irgendwo "Feuerwehrzufahrt" oder ähnliche Schilder

Check mal
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164709371
pixelvektor (2025-04-12 18:23:41+00:00): Hi :)
Danke für den Hinweis. Habs angepasst.
Viele Grüße
fortera_au (2025-04-10 13:00:34+00:00): Hi, is this canal signposted as "Irrigation", it seems like a descriptive name, which shouldn't be in the name tag.
NeisRevert (2025-04-10 07:08:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/164753995 where the changeset comment is: 
Remove vandalism
TinPetreković (2025-04-09 14:51:37+00:00): Accidental node creation #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164728778
eggie (2025-04-09 07:56:10+00:00): Dag Marco...

=onbekend  is geen valide tag.
Alle tagging is in UK English.
=unknown  lijkt me dan wel goed.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-04-09 07:57:44+00:00): Wanneer ik in de BGT omtrekgericht kijkt hebben beide tracks een breedte van ongev. 3 m.
Marco Ubaghs (VRZL) (2025-04-09 08:06:38+00:00): Ter plaatse geconstateerd dat de weg op diverse plekken breder is dan 3 meter. We kunnen in ieder geval met een brandweervoertuig erover heen rijden.
eggie (2025-04-09 08:26:37+00:00): Oke...je  zou wel onbekend kunnen aanpassen naar =unknown.
Groet..
eggie
eggie (2025-04-09 08:59:03+00:00): width = onbekend verwijderd.. unknown geeft ook een foutmelding.
Marco Ubaghs (VRZL) (2025-04-09 10:49:09+00:00): Dankjewel eggie.
eggie (2025-04-09 07:53:25+00:00): Dag AvN
Wanneer het onderbord aangeeft uitgezonderd landbouwvoertuigen.. dan kun je beter motor_vehicle=agricultural taggen.

agricultural=yes is meer bedoeld voor bv N wegen waar een trekker is toegestaan. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:agricultural

en

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:motor_vehicle%3Dagricultural

Zie je het verschil?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-04-09 09:07:30+00:00): Als bovenstaand aangepast naar motor_vehicle=agricultural.
emergency=yes toegevoegd. 
Ook oneway=yes verwijderd..  
Dat lijkt me niet kloppen.
https://smoothefiets.ddns.net/html/verkeersbordenkaart/index.php?lat=50.763715786&lng=5.901244998&z=18

MVG
eggie
NeisBot (2025-04-09 07:54:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2025-04-11 08:12:40+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164766244
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2025-04-30 01:22:49+00:00): Please attach speed cameras to the road.

Or create a maxspeed enforcement relation.

See:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dspeed_camera
eggie (2025-04-09 11:03:33+00:00): Dag AvN

Dat is eigenlijk niet correct.
De tag is dam motor_vehicle=agricultural  niet agricultural=yes  Dat heeft een andere functie.
Dat is een uitzondering op een weg waar normaal een trekker niet mag komen.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-04-09 11:07:02+00:00): Ik heb het aangepast naar motor_vehicle=agricultural mey emergency= yes

MVG
eggie
rskedgell (2025-04-09 09:31:49+00:00): Thanks! Barking & Dagenham tends to get a little neglected.

A lot was added from GPS traces during the initial phase and Mapillary images I took in Oct 2019. Another user added some more recent imagery in Jun 2024, which might be of some use.
Ropino (2025-07-03 07:43:53+00:00): Hallo,
die Bundesstraße ist zwar gut ausgebaut, entspricht aber in mehreren Punkten nicht der Wiki-Beschreibung:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dtrunk
1) keine Kreuzungsfreiheit
2) keine Ein-/Ausfahrten (Anschlußstellen)
3) mindestens 2 Anschlußstellen (siehe 2)
Ich bitte um Revert auf "primary".
VG
Yog Sot (2025-04-09 09:55:42+00:00): przeciez linia rozdzielająca pasy jest tylko  10 metrów od pasów... street complete nie powinno prowadzic do mapowania fikcji
eggie (2025-04-09 08:48:31+00:00): Dag Daddy, maar waarom dan access=no?
Dat betekent toch verboden toegang voor iedereen.
oneway=no is default op wegen. Dat hoef je niet te taggen. 

MVG
eggie

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-04-09 08:50:48+00:00): Het vervolg van het stuk dat je aangepast hebt staat ook allemaal nog op oneway=no?
Het zal dus niet verder routeren. 
bicycle=yes hoort niet op een fietspad.
eggie (2025-04-09 08:54:36+00:00): Ik heb bij het vervolg ook access=no verwijderd..  Je zou nog even kunnen kijken of dat terecht is en de regel note=Langdurig afgesloten....... evt verwijderen. 
MVG
eggie
Daddy McLegend (2025-04-09 09:09:05+00:00): Excuus. Access=no heb ik niet (opnieuw) ingesteld, dat stond al zo.

Het fietspad is in ieder geval weer begaanbaar. Er ligt geen water meer op het pad.
eggie (2025-04-09 09:19:00+00:00): Oke... Dan routeert nu het hele pad weer, Weet je toevallig ook of de voetpaden ten noorden van dat fietspad weer open zijn? 
Die staan ook allemaal nog op slot door access=no. 

Gr eggie
Daddy McLegend (2025-04-09 11:03:02+00:00): Nee helaas.. Op de meest recente versie van de PDF van www.np-zuidkennemerland.nl/ staan nog verouderde updates. 

Ga er binnenkort wel wandelen, dan kan ik het checken :-)
eggie (2025-04-09 11:07:44+00:00): Ahh.. Top!
mga_geo (2025-04-09 16:42:29+00:00): Bonsoir,
Je viens d'ajouter l'attribut junction=roundabout au rond-point.
J'ai des doutes sur les attributs cycleway:both et surface, vous avez vérifié dans le wiki ?
J'ai corrigé le tracé de 4 relations route=bus.
Marc
eggie (2025-04-09 09:11:20+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback Alle begin is moeilijk De Vderoldseweg is toch geen tunnel met layer=-1?
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=164713234

oneway=no hoeft niet op wegen . Het is default. 

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-04-09 09:15:05+00:00): De hoogtebeperkin staat al op het tunnelgedeelte. Wanneer je de hoogtebeperking ook op dit deel van de weg gaat taggen zal de weg ook niet routeren voor ander verkeer dar hoger is dan 2.30  Het gaat alleen om het tunnelgedeelte en dat is al correct getagd.
Het lijkt me beter dit even terug te draaien. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-04-09 09:16:33+00:00): reverted changeset #164714125
Wanneer je vragen hebt stel ze gerust.
MVG
eggie
rednail (2025-04-09 13:01:53+00:00): Hallo, hier hast du das Autohaus jetzt doppelt gemoppelt. Als Punkt/node und als Gebäude/way.
Siehe:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Ein_Objekt,_ein_OSM-Element
SteDi31 (2025-04-10 04:47:31+00:00): Auch hier vielen Dank. Punkt wurde entfernt.
kmpoppe_repair (2025-04-10 11:26:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 164763734 where the changeset comment is: Reverting undiscussed mass edits to shops in Germany that add mostly incorrect addresses
silversurfer83 (2025-04-09 15:59:20+00:00): Hi :)

ich hätte da zwei Lektüretips im Wiki für zukünfitge POI-Schließungen. Vielleicht magst du dein Vorgehen entsprechend zu node erhalten und nur umtaggen ändern :)

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history

happy mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164714622
urk (2025-04-10 08:18:53+00:00): Hi, Danke für Deine freundlichen Hinweise.
Ich hatte mich gegen einen lifecycle tag entschieden. Die "Bäckerei" war ein Tresen im Supermarkt zwischen Kasse und Ein-/Ausgang. Davon war nichts mehr übrig als die Erinnerung der befragten Kassiererin und einige anders gefliesten Wandflächen, verdeckt durch Plakatraumteiler und Supermarktregale.
Am ehesten wäre wohl noch der demolished prefix zutreffend, scheint mir aber der nun anderweitigen Nutzung eines kleinen Teil der Supermarktverkaufsfläche nicht adäquat zu sein.
Augenblicklich wüsste ich leider nicht, wie ich den change set unter Vespucci (oder einer anderen Android app) zurück nehmen kann. Bin noch ein paar Wochen unterwegs ohne PC und JOSM :)
silversurfer83 (2025-04-10 09:15:45+00:00): Moin urk,

Danke für die schnelle Rückmeldung.

In dem Fall würde ich mich dir vermutlich anschließen und sagen "mach weg".

Danke für die schnelle Rückmeldung

Happy mapping :)
pyrog (2026-03-10 19:02:06+00:00): Bonsoir,

Ici aussi des suppressions de sentiers, et de carrefours sans documentation.

https://knooppuntnet.nl/fr/analysis/node/5010270097/map

Supprimer le way du sentier pour rajouter un way d'une piste de "raquettes" n'est pas adapté.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1178650378
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1376074783

Idem pour ce way :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1178650379

Le sentier reste bien visible sur l'orthophoto.
Il y a aussi une "activité" pédestre et même VTT sur la carte de chaleur Strava.

Celui-ci aussi est bien visible sur BDOrtho IGN et sur le MNT LiDAR HD :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1178650381
PCtrlV (2026-03-11 08:35:53+00:00): Bonjour,

Les modifications n'ont peut-être pas été faite "dans les règles de l'art" pour Openstreetmap (je ne maitrise pas tous les rudiments) mais ils sont bien effectifs sur le terrain.
Le sentier passant dans les golfs est uniquement un sentier raquettes (praticable en hiver) et pas un sentier pédestre estival à travers les golfs.

Pour le second sentier supprimé, bien que pratiqué sur le terrain, il est interdit d'accès par son propriétaire.

Comme dans de nombreux territoires en France de plus en plus de propriétaires voient la fréquentation sur leur terrain privés s'accentuer sans respect par les pratiquants. Ainsi un propriétaire a fait la demande à la communauté de communes de supprimer ce sentier afin qu'il n'apparaissent plus sur les diverses applications utilisant OSM comme base.

Vous remerciant pour votre compréhension
Dodko (2025-04-14 09:58:43+00:00): Rozmery budovy som opravil podľa katastra a doplnil presnejšie adresu.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=164930594
IrisSpenlow (2025-04-14 14:28:28+00:00): Ďakujem za úpravu. Viete mi aj povedať či sa zmena prejaví do iných máp? Pol orka máme skolaudované a adresa sa neaktualizovala nikde zatiaľ
Dodko (2025-04-14 14:46:43+00:00): Zmena prejde do aplikácií mapy.com, Offline Organic Maps, Magic Earth Navigation & Maps, OsmAnd a iné ktoré používajú dáta z OSM.
aixbrick (2025-04-09 11:54:55+00:00): Again, what is your source? Website? How do you ensure that the given address is correct?

For your information: There is a forum topic, maybe you could participate: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/user-andert-adressen-bei-supermarkten/128559.
viupu (2025-04-21 17:53:26+00:00): Muutoskokoelma peruttu virheellisen muokkauksen takia. Tiet Vanha Viipurintie/Vainikkalantie ja Merenlahdentie kuuluu tertiary-luokkaan tiennumeron perusteella. Linkki keskusteluun aiheesta: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/lappeenrannan-seudun-tieluokitukset/128994

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165252107
mga_geo (2025-05-18 17:15:06+00:00): Bonsoir,
Les suggestions d'iD ne sont pas toujours exactes.
La valeur de l'attribut network est "FR:STAR" cf https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Rennes/Transports_en_commun
Pouvez-vous corriger les relations modifiées ? et faire une demande à iD ?
Marc
Syl (2025-04-09 10:28:01+00:00): Bonjour, le parc canin est déjà terminé ? Il n'y avait rien il y a deux semaines.
sudo_man (2025-04-10 07:14:37+00:00): Salut, les barrières ont été installées tout autour du parc. Ce n'est plus accessible en tant que stade en tout cas. Mais en effet je peux ajouter un tag en travaux.
Syl (2025-04-10 08:10:41+00:00): Ok il n'y avait pas de barrières quand j'étais passé. Je te laisse voir comment modifier vu que tu y es passé plus récemment.
sudo_man (2025-04-10 08:15:28+00:00): c'est fait :)
yzal (2025-04-09 13:12:19+00:00): Dobrý deň. Značka "name" slúži pre oficiálne pomenovanie daného objektu. Do "name" patrí napríklad názov ulice, obchodu, prevádzky atď. Do "name" nepatrí popis daného objektu.
Tým chcem povedať že name=bistro marína je v poriadku. V poriadku nie je name=miesto na posedenie a name=nové parkovacie miesta, lebo tam sa jedná o popis daného objektu, ktorý by mal byť vyjadrený inými značkami. Viac info o tom tu https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:N%C3%A1zvy

Taktiež ten kúsok vybetónovanej plochy s lavičkami by som asi parkom nenazval. Keďže už podľa názvu "miesto na posedenie" by tam viac patrilo pár bodov s amenity=bench a hneď by bolo vedieť že sa tam dá sedieť.

Hlavne ste ale pri mazaní ciest zmazali kus kanianskej cesty, takže kus obory je takpovediac odrezaný od sveta a to sa mi nezdá, že by tú cestu niekto zbúral.
Robond (2025-04-09 13:28:37+00:00): Dobrý deň, ďakujem za spätnú väzbu, chyby som opravil.
NeisBot (2025-04-09 10:03:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2025-04-11 08:13:01+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/164803312
dreua (2025-04-18 13:32:45+00:00): Ist die Jupitersäule wieder da oder warst du mit meinem Tagging unglücklich? Den note Tag daran sollten wir dann ggf. auch anpassen oder löschen.
byziden (2025-04-09 19:20:00+00:00): This unfortunately has not resolved the issue. For example https://pasteboard.co/0CL8icNEP83n.png