piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
nurdafur (2026-01-19 10:32:57+00:00): Hallo Welpi
Schön, dass du angefangen hast, mit dem Karografieren. In diesem Changeset hast du einige Wanderrouten zugefügt. Die Boßelroute und die Vorgartenroute sind vor Ort zumindest momentan nicht markiert. Deshalb hat @mueschel die Boßelroute vor kurzem zu unmarked:route gewechselt. Dasselbe mache ich gerade mit der Vorgartenroute. Routen sollen nur in OSM sichtbar sein, wenn sie eine Beschilderung vor Ort aufweisen. Eigentlich sollten wir die Routen also komplett von OSM entfernen. Um die Arbeit nicht zu vernichten und da die Routen ja vielleicht irgendwann noch ausgeschildert werden, haben wir nur das prefix unmarked verwendet.
Liebe Grüße und weiterhin viel Spaß beim Kartografieren
Urs
PS: Die Biberwanderroute und die blau und rot markierten Schirlwanderungen, die ich gerade noch etwas fortsetze, können noch vervollständigt werden, falls du demnächst mal wieder in die Natur raus gehen willst.
marc__marc (2025-12-07 11:42:29+00:00): Bonjour,
Merci pour ces améliorations.
le sujet a l'air de te passionner autant que moi :)
je te signale que osmose permet de rajouter facilement des informations, par ex la référence européenne de station
par ex pour celle que tu as touché en dernier
soit sous forme de carte
https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/map/#item=8411%2C8412&level=1%2C2%2C3&username=NikoJorj
soit sous forme de liste :
https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/byuser/NikoJorj?item=8411&limit=999
c'est à prendre avec un esprit critique, parfois il y a confusion entre 2 stations proches (comme ici entre la station mono borne au NE avec tesla et entre tesla et celle du garage.
j'ai ajouté la ref sur la station
Cordialement,
Marc
NikoJorj (2025-12-07 17:39:13+00:00): Ah intéressant merci! Où est-ce que je peux consulter simplement la ref:EU:EVSE pour croiser et vérifier?
marc__marc (2025-12-07 18:03:31+00:00): En France, tous doivent publier sur https://www.data.gouv.fr/
c'est la source officielle des ref mais il faut aller chercher l'opérateur que tu veux

Ensuite c'est agrégé en un seul fichier https://www.data.gouv.fr/datasets/base-nationale-des-irve-infrastructures-de-recharge-pour-vehicules-electriques
Tu as carte qui est affiche si tu connais la localisation. tu peux aussi chercher par id

Ensuite on fait un traitement pour regrouper par station et corriger plein de détail (typographique, format de numéro de téléphone etc)
https://github.com/Jungle-Bus/ref-EU-EVSE/blob/gh-pages/opendata_stations.csv
Si tu n'as pas besoin d'interface graphique, je te conseille ce fichier là car il est plus petit que les autres et tu as tous les réseaux en un. mais il faut connaitre un bout du nom ou de l'adresse ou quelque chose pour trouver la station que tu veux.
Il y a d'autres moyens plus lourd (josm par ex)
NikoJorj (2025-12-08 08:25:28+00:00): Super! Le csv de JungleBus rentre bien dans QGIS, plus qu'à m'y mettre, merci bien!
pitscheplatsch (2025-12-03 16:18:53+00:00): Partly reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175453905
JJIglesias (2025-12-03 15:23:25+00:00): Saludos.
Por que remover la Descripcion si lo que esta alli escrito es la verdad?
5m4u9 (2025-12-03 15:32:39+00:00): La descripción que puse era en realidad un "note" a mi mismo porque leí una noticia, pero era alarmista porque sí está siendo "tratada" de alguna manera por la misma empresa que gestiona k'ara k'ara y la de quillacollo, y tiene unas partes de mentira o medias verdades.

Voy a mejorar la descripción pero enfocada para el usuario final.
FajrAl (2026-03-22 13:19:33+00:00): Yang dekat Kutacane itu semua pakai tag village? bukan tag hamlet?
w_djatmiko (2026-03-30 03:13:48+00:00): Hi FajrAI,Terima kasih atas komentarnya.Di changeset tersebut saya hanya menggeser node dari tengah desa ke lokasi kantor kepala desa (pusat administrasi). Karena itu adalah desa resmi (bukan dusun), saya tetap menggunakan place=village.Kalau menurut data lokal ada yang sebenarnya dusun (bukan desa tersendiri), tolong sebutkan nama dusunnya atau changeset mana saja yang perlu dicek, biar saya koreksi.Saya pakai data dari tanahair.indonesia.go.id (BIG) sebagai referensi utama.Thanks!
FajrAl (2026-03-30 03:44:34+00:00): Terima balasannya. Dalam hal ini, para PoI yang ditanyakan yaitu tag place=village yang sepertinya merujuk kepada kampung, bukan desa secara administrasi. Sayangnya PoI village ini hanya memiliki 1 riwayat saja dan tidak ada riwayat sebelumnya.
这里没有鱼 (2025-12-04 12:51:31+00:00): 发现地图线的标签丢失了。所以把这个编辑回退了。
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175491901#map=11/30.6188/103.9886
vectorial8192 (2025-12-03 13:06:37+00:00): This is not a complaint, but more like a thinking exercise / commentary.

Usually, explicitly adding `bicycle=yes` should mean "there is irl signage that explicitly permits bikes", which afaik HK does not have. However, perhaps there are pathfinders/routers that defaults `highway=trunk` to be `bicycle=no`, which necessitates this unusual mapping.
kingkingHK (2025-12-03 13:55:53+00:00): Yes, indeed some routers (e.g. OSRM) do assume `bicycle=no` for `highway=trunk` (see https://github.com/Project-OSRM/osrm-backend/issues/1996), but I am not sure if `bicycle=yes` can override it.

Now even though it is said that we should not "map for the router", `bicycle=yes` on roads where cycling is legal is not really incorrect or fictitious, and it increases the chance for data consumers to interpret data correctly (e.g. would they really look at `not:bicycle=no`?), so I don't see a reason to not do it.
Kovoschiz (2025-12-03 17:03:34+00:00): @vectorial8192 That's `=designated`
Kovoschiz (2025-12-03 17:06:24+00:00): `not:*=` is for OSM editing only.
Branko Kokanovic (2025-12-03 14:55:36+00:00): This ref "3812578" do not exist, can you double check?
anshanin (2025-12-03 15:05:48+00:00): It was "3812578a", I fixed it two hours ago.
Branko Kokanovic (2025-12-03 15:09:18+00:00): Oh, sorry:)
mcliquid (2025-12-03 17:58:52+00:00): See also: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175445897
mcliquid (2025-12-03 17:58:35+00:00): Hello K12230LF, thank you for your edits with JOSM.

A quick note: this changeset includes modifications in very distant locations — from **Finland down to Nigeria**. Even if the goal was simply to correct maxspeed syntax, combining such far-apart edits into a single changeset makes it difficult for other mappers to review, understand, or revert the changes if needed.

For future work, it’s best to:

* keep each changeset focused on one small, local area,
* upload before moving on to a different region or country,
* and group similar corrections geographically rather than globally.

More guidance can be found here:
[https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets)

Thanks for considering this, and happy mapping!
K12230LF (2025-12-04 17:24:14+00:00): Hello mcliquid, thank you for your message. I did not see that I was selecting the whole world, I thought that when I was clicking on the button JOSM from a similar to that one was effectively filtering on France : https://taginfo.geofabrik.de/europe:france/tags/maxspeed=20kmh

I'll better check that next time.

Happy mapping as well
Pink Duck (2025-12-06 15:50:32+00:00): Removing explicit unit from maxspeed tagging only introduces ambiguity and little benefit other than a few bytes per text record in a database.
K12230LF (2025-12-06 17:32:50+00:00): Wiki explicitly says : The maximum fixed numeric speed limit, followed by the appropriate unit, if not measured in km/h. When the value is in km/h then no unit should be included. For example, maxspeed=60 for 60 km/h and maxspeed=50 mph for 50 mph (note the space between the value and the unit)
-> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxspeed

We have the same for maxheight with meters
Pink Duck (2025-12-07 08:51:02+00:00): That's the wiki for you. However, I was right about no unit being an increase in ambiguity for the casual mapper. With time, someone will inevitably come along and add the ' km/h' back in by bot. Essentially, was just questioning the necessity of data removal that was already correct, which you have yet to respond to. It’s something to do, I guess.
K12230LF (2025-12-10 13:02:24+00:00): Thank you for your reply. 
I would say that standardizing fields allows tools that reuse the OSM database to be more likely to take them into account.

If you look at taginfo: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/maxspeed#values, there are 21 million elements that have a maxspeed value, and 220 of them contain the keyword “km” (searching in the box at the top right of the table) and a few million for miles. So we have about 15 million cases without a unit, to indicate that it is km/h.

Of the 220 items explicitly tagged for km/h, we sometimes find “80km/h,” “30 km/h,” “50 km,” and “180km/h.” So there is no unified syntax for this (except for what the wiki says, which indicates that no suffix should be added for km/h).

At first glance, the syntax for “mph” is more often respected (perhaps also linked to the wiki, which indicates how to write mph?). In any case, we don't see much mp/h or “30mph.”
eggie (2025-12-03 13:27:45+00:00): Dag number  Je vraagt feedback Formeel is het geen olifantenpaadje (informal=yes) , maar een stukje G11 fietspad. Ik heb het aangepast.

MVG
eggie
number975312468 (2025-12-03 13:32:36+00:00): thanks!
number975312468 (2025-12-03 22:00:33+00:00): This change, when will I see this one affecting walking distance to Brede School Rembrandt?

From Olmenlaan, 1185kh

Brede School Rembrandt:
2, Meester P.J.M. Aalberselaan, Amstelveen, North Holland, Netherlands, 1181 XJ, Netherlands
eggie (2025-12-03 22:06:56+00:00): 
Updates will take several days.. it depends from the routingapp you use
eggie (2025-12-03 13:31:30+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  Dit doet helemaal niets in OSM.
Wat is je bedoeling.
Is het een tappunt voor drinkwater?
Zoiets krijgt ook geen naam. Wellicht operator=...............

en amenity=drinking_water
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-12-03 13:34:08+00:00): Wellicht amenity=demi_water
eggie (2025-12-03 13:37:13+00:00): demi_water tag toegevoegd
Dimitar155 (2025-12-03 19:36:50+00:00): Asphalt smoothness is a variable, not a constant. check_date:smoothness would be greatly appreciated by the next mapper who will travel on this road in a few years. :)
Fraxi (2025-12-04 13:12:37+00:00): Too "variable" for BG roads :D
rhhs (2025-12-04 16:30:19+00:00): Agree, although quite likely the next mapper will be me visiting my mother-in-law for Christmas...
MarcoR (2025-12-10 08:12:40+00:00): I fully reverted this changeset with the changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175746553
MarcoR (2025-12-10 08:12:46+00:00): I fully reverted this changeset with the changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175746553
MarcoR (2025-12-10 08:12:50+00:00): I fully reverted this changeset with the changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175746553
MarcoR (2025-12-10 08:12:55+00:00): I fully reverted this changeset with the changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175746553
MarcoR (2025-12-10 08:12:58+00:00): I fully reverted this changeset with the changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175746553
MarcoR (2025-12-10 08:13:02+00:00): I fully reverted this changeset with the changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175746553
MarcoR (2025-12-10 08:13:06+00:00): I fully reverted this changeset with the changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175746553
MarcoR (2025-12-10 08:13:10+00:00): I fully reverted this changeset with the changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175746553
MarcoR (2025-12-10 08:13:14+00:00): I fully reverted this changeset with the changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175746553
Đuro Jiří (2025-12-06 17:16:17+00:00): Čau mapperue, předtím než uděláš revert, protože máš podezření na kopírování z Google Maps,bi bylo nejlepší nejdřív napsat autorovi a zjistit jestli to je doopravdy zkopírované a nebo ne. Protože někteří mapují na OSM i na Google Maps.
MarcoR (2025-12-10 08:13:19+00:00): I fully reverted this changeset with the changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175746553
Mannivu (2025-12-06 17:10:16+00:00): Hi, how do you know the other user copied data from GMaps of the edit was only to delete a duplicate POI?
DimaLebedev (2026-01-26 11:55:58+00:00): #mapbox_missing_roads
aixbrick (2025-12-03 14:06:22+00:00): Hallo,
der Eintrag von Gewannnamen in OSM sind immer wieder Thema im Forum. Dabei wird zumeist festgestellt, dass das Namen sind, die uralt und heute nicht mehr gebräulich sind. Dazu können die auch fehlerhaft von gedruckten Karten bzw. aus anderen Quellen ins ALKIS übernommen worden sein. Eine Übernahme nach OSM ist daher nur bedingt sinnvoll, weil OTG nicht nachprüfbar und möglicherweise sogar falsch. Im Zweifel löscht das dann jemand anderes wieder.
Das nur als Anmerkung, bevor du dir noch mehr Mühe machst. :-)
Gruß
𝙢𝙖𝙧𝙖𝙯𝙯𝙚𝙧 ദ്ദി ᗜˬᗜ✧ (2025-12-03 13:33:37+00:00): Źródło: https://discord.com/channels/783754873861963786/783766269707026483/1445728598219821149
theDM (2025-12-04 03:36:26+00:00): Polemizowałbym z tym, że ten odcinek nie ma znaczenia dla krajowego i międzynarodowego tranzytu. Jedynie nie było konsensusu co do trunka na Marynarki Polskiej.
dikkeknodel (2025-12-15 20:28:26+00:00): Hi aryaiueo,
Thanks for contributing to openstreetmap and this hotosm project in particular. I'm currently validating the task you contributed to. I notice that you did not square all corners of the buildings you've drawn. Typically buildings have square corners. iD editor has a special function to do this for you. Have a look at https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#basic-editing-with-id an search for "square" in that text.
For this particular task, I've corrected the issues and will validate the task OK.
Keep up the good work!
Cheers!
Sakari_N (2025-12-03 15:19:53+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap,

Are you sure they have moved? Address in their website and instagram is still to this Mariankatu location.
outgoing-owl-homer (2025-12-03 17:18:19+00:00): Yes, the new Bike Kitchen is opening tomorrow in Kaleva, Tampere, the maintainer just has not yet updated the website(s) because the move just completed this week. Google Maps has been updated, and it would be nice to update OSM because AFAIK Nysse uses it for the route planner in Tampere.
Sakari_N (2025-12-06 17:36:12+00:00): Okay, good! I was going to suggest moving it physically too, but you figured that out already. Good job :)
literan (2025-12-03 19:34:22+00:00): что за Митино-Строгинская линия метро? откуда такое название?
neo-plan (2025-12-03 19:41:23+00:00): С информационного щита на стройке. Но можно исправить на "строительство метро"!? А то мне тут написали подобное про Гольяново: там полно отдельных очагов строек метро и на каждом написано "Станция метро", хотя строят просто туннель.
literan (2025-12-03 19:54:34+00:00): обычно пишут вот так: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/55.608001/37.656286&layers=N

здесь просто название линии неверное. Она называется Арбатско-Покровская линия

здесь, видимо, вентшахту до сих пор строят
michel60 (2025-12-16 08:00:49+00:00): Bonjour,
Je ne pense pas que le Relation : Bus N130 : Gare de Marne-la-Vallée - Chessy Nord → Gare de Lyon (6355914)
Version #216 passe comme cela à Noisy-Champs, l'arrêt est du mauvais côté de la route.
GEOFABRIK OSM Inspector le montre en erreur de continuité (affiché en noir) dans le lien ci-dessous : 
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=2.58325&lat=48.84253&zoom=17&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.99&overlays=ptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes
En cliquant sur la ligne noire, vous aurez le détail de l'erreur.
J'espère que cet outils vous aidera.
Cordialement Michel
Gregory Peony (2025-12-04 03:24:53+00:00): Hello jalfiewalfie welcome to OSM.

After tracing and tagging features which are likely square or round, please remember to square their corners `q`, or circularise them `o`, because it is almost impossible and time consuming to draw shapes so percisely manually. Buildings with metal or pitched roofs tend to have square corners; round buildings are identifiable by the distinctive cresent shaped shadow they cast. Unless the building is clearly a different shape then it's best to assume that it should be rounded or its corners should be squared. In the ID Editor, you can `right click` for access to editing functions. Since roofs tend to overhang walls trace the initial shape slightly smaller to allow a buffer for any change in size which may occur. In JOSM use the [buildingstools plugin](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/BuildingsTools). In ID you must draw the shape accurately enough if you want every corner to be squared. This [video about squaring features in ID](https://youtu.be/Xs5wX592E1o) has more information and a demo.

Keep on mapping!

Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
NeatNit (2025-12-04 17:31:16+00:00): Hi, thank you for your contribution.

The names of bus stops have to match the sign. They are pulled from the GTFS database from the ministry of transportation. Please let me know if the name on the sign is different from the one mapped.

Thanks!
NeisBot (2025-12-13 22:12:16+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Biuro rachunkowe w Poznaniu"
---
Na przykład, bardziej neutralna i obiektywna wersja Twojego opisu mogłaby brzmieć: "Biuro rachunkowe w Poznaniu"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-12-13 22:32:26+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/175465176
FakturTax biuro księgowe Poznań (2025-12-15 08:58:17+00:00): Biuro rachunkowe Poznań
NeisBot (2025-12-13 22:12:18+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Water damage restoration service in Austin TX"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-12-16 17:15:09+00:00): 🔴 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the original contributor or remaining promotional text in description tags by https://osm.org/changeset/176015904
eggie (2025-12-07 14:17:08+00:00): Dag Remco,

name Uitrit Kazerne Zebra is geen straat naam.
Al die accesstags zijn default, maar ik denk dat het beter access=private is met emergency=yes

MVG
eggie
trial (2026-01-12 16:09:54+00:00): Le 24 rue du Sous-Marin Vénus (avec l'accent) n'est plus en construction. Cadastre à jour.
benoitdd (2026-01-13 09:29:02+00:00): je te laisse le corriger, je ne suis pas sur place et je suis certain que tu sais faire :)
trial (2026-07-20 14:54:35+00:00): Je te laisse le plaisir de mettre au 6 Boulevard Nail le POI short_name=OSM.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175448412#map=19/47.731527/-3.363804

Si, si, https://ouestsecuritemarine.com/a-propos/#nos_stations
ilias_ (2025-12-03 23:45:08+00:00): you added "Sidi Ali" as the alternative name to... Sidi Ali?
Reino Baptista (2025-12-04 07:53:58+00:00): I did it to ensure that Nominatim returns a result when querying ‘Sidi Ali’. The name tag is overloaded with multiple variants in different alphabets and in both left-to-right and right-to-left scripts, which prevented consistent matching. Using 'alt_name=Sidi Ali' ensures that a query for ‘Sidi Ali’ now works reliably.
RB
Angelo Giuseppe (2025-12-09 16:08:47+00:00): Il percorso della Me Mo Ovest, preso da un KLM di Google sul sito https://sentieromedamontorfano.it/mappa/ non ha sul terreno cartelli e quindi non rispetta le regole dei percorsi hiking.
Cortix (2025-12-09 17:31:33+00:00): Status proposed appena aggiornato:
https://sentieromedamontorfano.it/sentiero-da-meda-a-montorfano-lungo-la-valle-del-seveso/
MarkoŠatrak (2025-12-04 11:42:25+00:00): Reverting because the whole street should have been tagged with truck restrictions #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175487792
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-12-04 13:38:06+00:00): Hi! I removed the oneway tag because it is permitted to u-turn from atwater going south to atwater going north. There is no sign prohibiting it, so we must keep the segment two-way. Thanks and have a nice day!
MassCartog (2025-12-03 15:38:49+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM. Some of the features you removed in this changeset are valid. Please don’t remove valid OSM data.

You have a new account and might not be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground. If it exists on the ground, it is valid data regardless of a feature being public or private, designated or informal/illegal/unauthorized. Removing features that exist is actually considered vandalism.

It's clear that these features still exist on the ground. Not being public access areas is an invalid reason to remove data from OSM. So this edit is incorrect and damaging to valid OSM data.

The correct way to handle this is to use OSM's tagging system. access=private, or access=no would be appropriate if they are closed to the public. Once this is done, services that do use OSM data will reflect that and specify their access.

Please read this for more info:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won't_delete_roads_on_private_property

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F
gurglypipe (2025-12-03 15:27:12+00:00): Hiya, thanks for your contributions to OSM for the NT so far, it’s great to see the NT continuing to improve the map!

In this case, the highway tagging is correct and needed, so I’ve re-added it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175451682.

Features are mapped on OSM even if they’re private, with tagging like foot=private indicating that. (OSM maps what’s on the ground, not just what’s accessible to a certain group of people.) In this case access=private wasn’t correct, as that sets the default access for all transport types to ‘private’, which means that private car access was enabled for the path. foot=private is sufficient.

Thanks again for your edits! Happy to discuss this further if you have any questions :)
NTUllswatervalleyPaths (2025-12-04 13:16:51+00:00): Hi
The reason i changed it that it is not a path, the landowner kindly gave us access while we did some work in Aira Force and the ground mats we put down left this line. Hopefully it will grow in and disappear. 
Thanks
gurglypipe (2025-12-04 13:29:50+00:00): Ah I see! Thanks for clarifying, and sorry for jumping to conclusions about your tagging. :)

I suggest using a lifecycle prefix (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix) and a note to indicate the history of the path, then. This will avoid other mappers unknowingly adding it back in future, because the line of ground mats will hang around on aerial imagery for several years.

How about the following?

demolished:highway=path
foot=private
note=Line of temporary ground mats for work on Aira Force, removed once work was completed. Not a path and no right of access.

Cheers :)
NTUllswatervalleyPaths (2025-12-04 13:37:12+00:00): Yes that sound good. Are you happy to change it or do i need to do it. I must admit i'm not very experienced on OSM.
Thanks