piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2026-02-25 11:50:57+00:00): Ik heb access=no verwijderd.
moped en mofa yes toegevoegd. 

Welk  bord staat er vooraan? 
Zou het wellicht motor_vehicle=destination moeten zijn?
Staat er een dergelijk bord? 
De aansluiting bij de Koekoekendijk heb ik aangepast. Daar loopt geen weg rechtomhoog de dijk op. 
Wanneer het een slechte gravelweg is dan zou tracktype=grade3 wellicht beter zijn. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-02-25 16:36:53+00:00): Het middenstuk vanaf de schuur heeft hier een bord Eigen Weg.
Formeel mag je daar gewoon rijden, maar gezien er vanaf de Arenbergsesingeldijk een bord Doodlopende weg muv tweewielers staat heb ik er motor_vehicle=destination.
Het fietspad is er niet. Er loopt een dubbelspoor met surface=grass_paver
Het middenstuk is momenteel niet te fietsen vanwege de blubber en heb ii niet meer uitgeprobeerd.
Het zal niet meer routeren voor regulier autoverkeer. 
tracktype=grade4 lijkt me verder prima behalve vanaf de Arenbergsesingeldijk. 
Dat is grade1 en de grass_paver is grade2.
MVG,
eggie
Paul van der Heijden (2026-02-26 12:09:09+00:00): Hallo Eggie, 
Onze brandweerwagens worden hier nu langs gestuurd. In de gemeente is dit aangemerkt als fietspad. Dit staat ook aan het begin. Doodlopend en daarna fietspad. 
Als je zorg dat hier geen doorgaand verkeer door gaat is het voor de brandweer goed en voor gemeente ook.
eggie (2026-02-26 12:36:47+00:00): Het zal niet meer routeren voor regulier verkeer categoeie mororvoertuigen.
Een fietspad heb ik niet gezien. Uitgezonderd tweewielers wil niet zeggen fietspad   Het is een blubbertrack  Eigen weg.
Ik kon niet verder fietsen wegens de blubber.
Voor wandelaars en tweewielers staat het op permissive.
Middenstuk staat nu op motor_vehicle=destination.
Vanaf de schuur tot aan dat huis op de hoek staat met destnation op slot.
Groet,
eggie
eggie (2026-02-26 12:43:45+00:00): Dit is wel een handig bestand om te raadplegen. Het verkeersbordenbestand van de overheid. 
https://wegkenmerken.ndw.nu/kaart/wegvakken/lijst?kaartlagen=BRT,SPEED_LIMIT,TRAFFIC_SIGN&zichtbaar-gebied=4.60577,51.66619,4.63494,51.67984&maxsnelheidfilter=1f5451a0.________Dw&verkeersbordfilter=47f8f896._____________________________________________98

Ook daar geen bord fietspad.
Op een met een bord Eigen Weg mag je overigens gewoon komen. Die zetten we in de regel gewoon op permissive.
Maar goed.. hier dus de uitzondering op de regel. Lijkt me wel logisch dat het alleen voor agrarisch gebruik is. 

MVG
eggie
kingkingHK (2026-02-25 11:56:51+00:00): Bus terminus crossings usually have yellow stripes; is this really unmarked?
Alan Shek (2026-02-26 03:32:20+00:00): Good point, let me update it to Marked Crossings :)
Kovoschiz (2026-02-26 08:18:09+00:00): However it's misleading, showing the `=marked` flaw. Those yellow stripes are not statutory, meaning they have no legal effects. They should not be confused with signalized, or white ones.
Rainero (2026-03-06 09:13:43+00:00): Hallo Michael Spitzenberger,

wie schon zuvor bei den Änderungssätzen https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176180375 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177497586 
bitte ich dich die Quellen für deine Änderungen offenzulegen.
streetlevel imagery; Internetrechereche ist keine konkrete Quellenangabe.
Hier in diesem Änderungssatz fällt mir die Dorfstraße https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/362117160 auf, die außerhalb von Attaching nicht so beschildert ist.  

Du hast in den letzten Wochen sehr viele Straßennamen aus unklarer Quelle ergänzt. Bitte mach bis zur Klärung der Quellen keine weiteren solchen Ergänzungen.

Viele Grüße,
Rainer
Rainero (2026-03-13 09:59:15+00:00): Revert mit changeset/179800474
(unzulässige Quelle)
Bienson (2026-02-25 22:28:56+00:00): All diese Zufahrtswege auf Friedhofsgeländen müssen mit motor_vehicle=private getaggt werden, sonst werden Autofahrer über diese Wege geroutet.
Bienson (2026-02-25 22:31:55+00:00): Oder vllt. noch besser mit vehicle=private, das schließt auch Fahrräder mit aus vom Routing.
FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (2026-02-26 08:12:27+00:00): Okay, dann werde ich alle Wege mit dem Tag highway=service mit vehicle=private ergänzen. VG
Jakka (2026-02-26 10:32:34+00:00): send private message
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:tourism%3Dcamp_pitch
wildmaps (2026-03-04 20:54:27+00:00): Hallo Biker2470,

ich habe gesehen dass du "motorcycle=no" auf der Umfahrungsstraße von Niederdorf zu "motorcycle=yes" abgeändert hast. Jedoch steht an beiden Seiten ein Verbotschild für Krafträder und ist somit als "motorcycle=no" einzutragen.

Danke
Michael
wildmaps (2026-03-04 21:00:35+00:00): Hallo Biker2470,

ich muss mich nochmal korrigieren. Es sind Motorräder ober 124cc ausgenommen daher habe ich die betreffende Straße angepasst.

motorcycle=yes
motorcycle:conditional=no @ (displacement <= 124 cc)

Danke
Michael
Biker2470 (2026-03-04 21:21:42+00:00): Ich habe eine Tour geplant dabei ist mir aufgefallen das dass navi unbedingt durch das Dorf will. Fahrzeug ist ein Motorrad 900cc. Ev betrifft es ja nur klein Motorräder?
wildmaps (2026-03-04 22:57:40+00:00): Genau, nur jene unter 124cc. Das habe ich nun als conditional angegeben. Danke für deine Änderung und Entschuldigung für die Störung.
Biker2470 (2026-03-05 18:22:00+00:00): keine Ursache, leider bringe ich meine Software noch immer nicht dazu die Umfahrung zu benutzen. Kannst du nochmal drüber schauen ob kein Abschnitt vergessen gegangen ist.  Ich benutze kurviger als Planungssoftware. Wenn es an Kurviger liegt würde ich das als Bug melden.

Gruss Oliver
Biker2470 (2026-03-05 18:23:29+00:00): hier noch der Link in Kurviger
https://kurv.gr/yX5sK
IvanaŠokčević (2026-02-26 08:31:57+00:00): A split is needed at the intersection with Camelia Road Northwest based on the position of the street sign, fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179073103 #OptimoRoute
IvanaŠokčević (2026-02-26 08:23:36+00:00): Changed tag from maxunladenweight to hgv:destination based on street signs, fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179072819
NeisBot (2026-02-25 12:03:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 25 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/70065578 v3 | 5 crossings
https://osm.org/way/69564133 v4 | 4 crossings
https://osm.org/way/70065591 v3 | 3 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/832554600 v4
https://osm.org/node/13595487683 v2
https://osm.org/node/13595487684 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179033531
NeisReview (2026-03-05 17:33:22+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/179076362
https://osm.org/changeset/179182913
https://osm.org/changeset/179312322
https://osm.org/changeset/179392421
maro21 (2026-02-25 16:22:01+00:00): – Budowę już zmapowałem kilka dni temu.
– Proszę nie mapować na podstawie anonimowych uwag bez sprawdzenia w innym źródle. W tym przypadku https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4875448 należy sprawdzić na miejscu czy jest tabliczka z nazwą ulicy. Nie dodajemy nazw ulic na podstawie adresów w jej pobliżu. Nie skomentuję nawet dodawania nieistniejącego ronda.
– Proszę podawać w opisie zmian CO zmieniłeś, a nie że zmieniłeś. Każdy zestaw zmian to zmiany lub poprawki, a "skorygowane" nic nie mówi https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
– OSM to nie jest zabawka. A patrząc na twoje poprzednie edycje jak https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177888915 czy https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51877952, lubisz sobie edytować jak ci się podoba.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-24 03:06:06+00:00): Removed SEO POI in favor of near-duplicate one "Bone Dry Roofing" (1F1E) with more specific and correct tags (node 13645436669) in changeset 186270652

https://www.osm.org/node/13645436669

https://osm.org/changeset/186270652
NeisBot (2026-02-25 12:12:46+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13597894499 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Car battery shop"
---
Na przykład, bardziej neutralna i obiektywna wersja Twojego tekstu mogłaby brzmieć: "Sklep z akumulatorami samochodowymi"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-03-05 17:33:08+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/179048460
surveyor54 (2026-02-26 09:09:18+00:00): Hallo, kannst du dir die beiden ways noch einmal anschaue, hier ist irgendetwas schief gelaufen.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/144479864
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/658563691

Gruß
surveyor54
surveyor54 (2026-02-26 09:14:16+00:00): Hi, ich noch mal. 
Bitte keine Hydranten mit Straßen verknüpfen. Die Koordinaten haben sich dadurch um 1,12 m geändert.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13327119491
Langenselbolder (2026-02-26 15:36:14+00:00): Salü!
Das mit dem Hydranten war ich nicht. Bin hier sehr wenig und habe nur eingeschränkte Ahnung, wie, wo und was.
In der Bearbeitungsansicht geht die Str. bis an die AB, in der Karte nicht. Warum kann ich nicht sagen oder beheben. Sorry
surveyor54 (2026-02-26 16:25:12+00:00): Alles OK.
Der Kollege https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/maybeyes hatte es schon bereinigt.
Viele Grüße
NeisBot (2026-02-25 12:27:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 10 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/41420529 v14 | 4 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/506575562 v7

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179034592
pitscheplatsch (2026-02-25 13:17:25+00:00): Should be fixed by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179035657
Luzandro (2026-02-25 14:38:20+00:00): Hallo,

ich habe old_name=Schönbrunner Schlossstraße auf alt_name geändert

old_name wäre für einen ehem. historischen Namen, aber die Straße hat nie so geheißen

alt_name ist für alternative Namen
Sylabowy Kot (2026-02-25 20:44:05+00:00): Polecam sprawdzać, czy JOSM nie skraca listy źródeł. Nie wszystko się zmieściło i zabrakło źródła nazwy. Przykładowo wg https://eon.pl/-/media/Przetargi/PZ-10956/RPZ-Kasprowicza-OSD-zakres-prac-stacja-i-linie.ashx ostatnie dwa słowa są zamienione miejscami.
evgenykatyshev (2026-02-25 12:34:06+00:00): On the ground, three buildings have official plates with the same number 79. But there is a shop with a plate with the number 79a in one of them. Another building has a sticker with ბ letter over its official plate. So I decided to use these controversial but unique addresses
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2026-02-26 00:07:47+00:00): Merhaba "Mehmet Bey" (ya da eski kullanıcı adınızla "Sinem Yazgı") uid:22152243 . Problemli gördüğüm birçok değişikliğinize geçmişte birden çok yorum yazdım. Hiçbirine cevap vermediniz. Aynı şekilde, yorum yazmanızı belirttiğim özel mesajlarıma da cevap vermediniz. Başkalarına da hiç cevap vermemişsiniz. https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=22152243

Normalde bu tür bir değişikliğe teker teker hangi yolun birbirine göre ne kadar yoğun kullanıldığını, nereleri bağladığını teker teker yazarak yorum yapardım. Fakat sizin benim yazdıklarımı okuyup okumadığınızı dahi bilmediğim için şimdilik bu zahmete katlanmayacağım. Yol sınflandırmalarınız hatalı olduğunu biliyorum, çünkü değiştirdiğiniz yolların birçoğundan defalarca geçtim.

Değişikliğinizi geri alıyorum. İtirazınız varsa, teker teker yol sınıfı değişiklik gerekçelerinizi yazarsanız cevap vermeye çalışırım.

Lütfen şu sayfaları okuyunuz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tr:Turkey_roads_tagging
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway

Eğer yol sınıflarını sadece osm.org 'daki görünümü değiştirmek için değiştiriyorsanız da lütfen şu sayfaları okuyunuz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Don%27t_tag_for_the_renderer

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_map_for_the_renderer

İyi günler.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179062047
IvanaŠokčević (2026-02-26 08:48:17+00:00): A split is needed at the intersection with Johnston Street based on street signs; fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179073711 #OptimoRoute
mueschel (2026-03-03 09:17:55+00:00): Hi,
the fuel tags added here are not common. Could you check the table in the wiki to check for the correct ones?
RJ Lerng (2026-03-05 19:22:34+00:00): I just copied them from what the petrol station put up on their big sign as well as at their pumps. I thought they were the experts on their trade. Were they not?
mueschel (2026-03-05 19:28:55+00:00): They are the experts in advertising their branded fuel names like "v-power". We usually convert them to what they really are like "octane_98".
What Shell sells in one place under this name might be completely different from what they sell somewhere else. 
In most places this information is required to be shown at least on the pumps themselves.
RJ Lerng (2026-03-05 19:36:10+00:00): Could you send me the link to the table in the wiki, please? Thanks!
mueschel (2026-03-05 19:41:18+00:00): Ah sorry.. Here it is:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:fuel:*
RJ Lerng (2026-03-07 07:48:20+00:00): Thank you very much! I will make corrections accordingly. Cheers!
MappingMore (2026-02-26 08:38:23+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:179073438
YomanNH (2026-02-25 19:31:34+00:00): Jeśli drogi nie ma i nie ma planów jej budowy, to jak najbardziej można ją usinąć. Ale co złego było w highway=service. Highway=track nie pasuje, sam napisałeś dlaczego, a jednak zmieniłeś...
Parowiec Świecący (2026-02-25 20:09:01+00:00): Chyba to, że przestała stanowić dojazd do czegokolwiek, przez to chciałem ją zdegradować. Usunę zatem pętlę, przywrócę highway=service i zostawię access=permissive. Chyba że zamiast access=permissive dać service=emergency_access? Podjazd do torów został i to nie jest tymczasowa konstrukcja.
YomanNH (2026-02-26 13:07:39+00:00): Nie wiem, czy jest tam jakiś znak na wjeździe. Jeśli nie, to nie dawałbym żadnego access, czyli zostanie dostęp domyślny (dla wszystkich).
Parowiec Świecący (2026-02-26 15:07:40+00:00): W porządku, tak zrobię. Jak skończą budowę, przyjdzie pora na ewentualne poprawki.
YomanNH (2026-02-28 07:35:14+00:00): Byłem wczoraj, sprawdziłem i nie było żadnego znaku na wjeździe. Więc tak jak to teraz poprawiłeś, uznałbym, że jest ok. Dzięki!
MappingMore (2026-02-26 08:46:56+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:179073780
IvanaŠokčević (2026-02-25 13:28:01+00:00): Deleted accidentaly created node, fixed on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179037180 #OptimoRoute
Tim Grose (2026-05-04 12:58:52+00:00): Hello Robert I see you have been mapping in Princes Coverts. The "bridle" path from the Avenue taking a right towards Oxshott is well defined one with a "compacted" surface albeit not an artificial one. "Dirt" is probably doing it a disservice. Venturing north from that junction with the Avenue towards Malden Rushett I rarely if ever go down. From memory that certainly is not so good at all. BTW I added a small car park at the Oxshott end. I was only there the other day "striding" the adjacent new build Merrileas Drive.
rskedgell (2026-05-04 14:55:12+00:00): Hi Tim,

I visited in exceptionally muddy conditions, which may have affected my perception of surface type and quality. Would you mind correcting the compacted section?
Tim Grose (2026-05-05 13:10:40+00:00): I ended going for "gravel" as that is how a Crown Estates leaflet describes it. "The Avenue" is classified "fine gravel" which I might query as a bit too nuanced but left it.  It is tricky here as these two are the only ones most people go on as everything else can indeed be "muddy" !! I see that this path from Oxshott and looping round as been marked a bridle path which again is subject to opinion when "The Avenue" is a land access track. I guess it does at least allow the default renderer to highlight the two as "different" to the myriad of lesser used and often very muddy paths elsewhere
jandar22 (2026-03-12 16:54:28+00:00): Hi, this is a pedestrian-only type of gate that'd usually be found on a footpath between farm fields (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dkissing_gate). Having a gate of any kind on a major street like this that would disallow vehicle traffic seems unlikely unless there's been some substantial construction. Are you sure this node shouldn't be on a nearby footpath or somewhere on private property?

I've made comments on a few of your changesets recently so to be clear I'm not singling you out for anything, I've just been doing a lot of mapping around here recently and want to bring up possible fixes when I see something.
StrikeMind (2026-03-12 17:02:58+00:00): Oh, that's not correct. The entire property at 1018 Arnold is enclosed in an aluminum criss cross pattern fence that's maybe 8-10 feet tall. The spot where I created the kissing_gate barrier is a "sliding window" of the fence. I'm not sure what's the most appropriate type of gate for that but I see that kissing_gate creates a stop on Arnold Street which isn't correct at all. What type of gate should I use for this situation? I've used kissing_gate incorrectly in other places, too.
jandar22 (2026-03-12 17:18:13+00:00): Gotcha! My guess by the sound of it could be a sliding gate, although I think the most common tag is just the more general https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dgate. It sounds like then that gate would be restricting access along a driveway or parking aisle on the 1018 Arnold site, which haven't been added to the map yet, so I can see why a mobile editor like Every Door would instead place the node on the nearest available way, which would be the main road. 

I've already been making some parking lot and driveway additions in the area from aerial imagery - how about I remove the gate on Arnold Street, add in some parking aisles and parking lots on the private property, and if you like you can add the gate back in at its exact location on the ground?
StrikeMind (2026-03-13 00:57:20+00:00): That sounds ideal in this case.

I'll be more mindful of gates snapping to the nearest way. I've already seen how Every Door will snap a stop sign similarly, I had no idea about gates.
unenTT (2026-02-25 13:35:54+00:00): Reverted changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178372730
diacriticalhit (2026-02-25 15:58:12+00:00): need to revert this
ceirios (2026-02-25 14:59:13+00:00): Hello

this is Swansea, in Wales. Not Mozambique.
Aethonatic (2026-02-25 19:48:56+00:00): Hello, I've reverted your edits because they appear to be low-quality, which seems to be a common pattern among a majority of your changesets. One example is that a wall adjacent to the Swansea City Bus Station was randomly connected to the left lane of West Way. Please thorough review your changes before publishing them.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179055250
ceirios (2026-02-25 14:58:33+00:00): Hi there,

Not sure what happened here but you seem to have dragged some nodes in Wales

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1214836127
silversurfer83 (2026-02-25 18:00:18+00:00): Hi there, too

This looks terrible, to be honest. The buildings you mapped are all over the place and you placed some polygons the size of a football stadium with building=house in that town. I'm sorry but I don't see much value in this changeset.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179038628
silversurfer83 (2026-02-25 18:08:16+00:00): reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179050054
silversurfer83 (2026-02-25 17:57:19+00:00): Moin,

auf vielen Schildern in der Stadt https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/250453506 steht als Betreiber "Kreis- und Hansestadt Korbach" was die Stadt auf ihrer Seite korbach.de auch unter "Kontakt" am Fuß der Seite stehen hat und sich auch im Impressum so nennt. Sollte dies dann nicht der official_name:de=* sein?

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179039596
JakobHtz (2026-02-26 09:56:22+00:00): Moin,

da wirst du vermutlich Recht haben. Ich checke bei den Anderen Orten auch nochmal gegen und verbessere das.

Danke für den Hinweis!
silversurfer83 (2026-02-26 09:58:35+00:00): Danke :)
MappingMore (2026-02-28 11:05:55+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:179165966
maro21 (2026-02-25 16:59:42+00:00): Nie kopiujemy z Google Maps.
Szkodnix (2026-02-25 23:06:12+00:00): Dosłownej lokalizacji czy samego punktu? A jeśli ktoś chce ogólnie dodać to jako ważniejsze miejsce?
maro21 (2026-02-28 18:02:37+00:00): Szkodnix: miejsce nie ma oficjalnej nazwy ani nie ma oznaczeń w terenie. Nie jest to zatem nazwa własna. Ktoś założył sobie w Google Maps obiekt o nazwie "Aleja Sakur", a inni dodają zdjęcia i oceniają. Równie dobrze mogą utworzyć sobie "polana w lesie na ognisko". Tutaj np. ktoś założył obiekt o nazwie "Nano's downhill (ნანოს დაღმართი)" https://www.google.pl/maps/place/Nano's+downhill+(%E1%83%9C%E1%83%90%E1%83%9C%E1%83%9D%E1%83%A1+%E1%83%93%E1%83%90%E1%83%A6%E1%83%9B%E1%83%90%E1%83%A0%E1%83%97%E1%83%98)/@51.1262066,17.0642399,18z/data=!4m6!3m5!1s0x470fe9005b9867a5:0x21393e4a50b3a0cf!8m2!3d51.126453!4d17.064494!16s%2Fg%2F11ypnkfsff!5m1!1e1?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI2MDIyNS4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D
Szkodnix (2026-02-28 21:16:29+00:00): Okej, to ma sens! Myślałem, że to jakaś oficjalna nazwa. Jak tak to rzeczywiście mniejsza.
TinPetreković (2026-02-25 15:16:30+00:00): The node that was accidentally created has been removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179041734
CAM-Gerlach (2026-02-25 14:59:39+00:00): Also remove problematic and inappropriate "image" tags that simply link to the object on Google Maps, which are not in fact an image file and is an impermissible data source, in addition to the known problems with the `image` tag leading to proposals to add such being rejected: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:image
CAM-Gerlach (2026-02-25 15:01:41+00:00): In part, a followup to changeset #179002817 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179002817 to correct the `wikipedia` links added therein to `manufacturer:wikipedia` (assuming we want to leave them at all and not just rely on the preferred `manufacturer:wikidata`, per US national community consensus.
NeisBot (2026-02-25 14:57:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13593581579 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Trading card store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-05 17:33:08+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179408177
(No visible changes after review)