piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Kogacarlo (2024-10-22 20:56:59+00:00): De bunker blijkt zichtbaar op de luchtfoto van 2021 - als je weet waar je naar zoekt - dus ik heb hem nu ook perfect op zijn plek gezet.
Syl (2024-09-12 16:47:00+00:00): Bonjour, je n'ai pas trouvé de source pour confirmer le lieu-dit appelé "Barrière" ce ne serait pas plutôt une barrière comme ce qui est indiqué par la BD Topo ?
Gonéo (2024-09-13 07:40:42+00:00): Bonjour Syl, je suis surpris par ce lieu-dit. Quand j'ajoute des sentiers manquants je n'ajoute jamais de lieu-dit, et encore moins avec un nom comme ça. Peut-être bien qu'il existait avant et qu'en séparant des points j'ai créé une v1. Bref, je viens de le supprimer. Merci pour ta vigilance.
Syl (2024-09-13 09:28:23+00:00): En regardant l'historique on voit qu'il y avait bien un nœud avec le nom Barrière : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9051213957/history
La vraie barrière a été ajoutée depuis, maintenant que le lieu-dit est supprimé les données sont corrects. Merci d'avoir corrigé.
JamJar II (2023-11-03 07:12:04+00:00): Can confirm there is no 'spoons here. Could you explain your note?
DressyPear4 (2023-11-01 20:51:55+00:00): Evite deletar caminhos, (mesmo que seja pelo rio) foram obtidos com traços strava (ainda visíveis)
Se há restrição de acesso apenas adicione "access=private"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143390683
Renan Schuller (2023-11-02 13:22:12+00:00): Obrigado!
apaguei pois sou morador da área em questão, e realmente este caminho não existe. Exibi-lo no mapa pode causar confusão.
Obrigado pelo feedback!
nevw (2023-10-30 23:25:36+00:00): Hi, houses are mapped by the  footprint they occupy instead of the land plot.
I have fixed the tagging. You may wish to draw the building outlines accurately and put the address tags on the main building instead of the house node I added.
nevw (2023-10-30 23:28:53+00:00): When mappers want to show the property boundaries, it is more common to map the fencelines instead of the plot of land as I have done.
maro21 (2023-10-31 22:57:20+00:00): A tu dalej coś budują? https://osm.org/way/1219638581
maraf24 (2023-11-01 11:04:21+00:00): Zaplecze, chyba w likwidacji.
Ten teren jest do sprawdzenia, w nocy nie widziałem, czy można już przez niego przejeżdzać Folwarczną.
BladeTC (2023-11-03 19:18:22+00:00): Did I made some mistake here? Sorry....
VLD278 (2023-11-03 21:30:17+00:00): Hello BladeTC, thank you for reaching out. While working on a duplicate ways project, we detected some overlapping ways. We resolved the issue by removing the duplicated ways.
ftcat (2023-10-31 06:20:15+00:00): Hi,

Did you check these before you uploaded them? Some have already been mapped, some are way out of position and Kobil no longer operates in Zambia and have not done so for over a year now. Please don't upload a large amount of data with out first checking it. Mass imports are not recommended by OSM.
janolezab (2023-10-30 23:19:32+00:00): Was ist mit den Hausnummern 572 und 574 geschehen?
woodpeck_repair (2023-10-30 23:06:28+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 143389627, 143389636, 143389673, 143389694.
user_18023081 (2025-06-10 02:57:38+00:00): Nice one 👀
woodpeck_repair (2023-10-30 23:13:36+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 143389011, 143389015, 143389026, 143389029, 143389030, 143389032, 143389033, 143389035, 143389037, 143389039, 143389040, 143389042, 143389045, 143389053, 143389076, 143389078, 143389080.
woodpeck_repair (2023-10-30 23:13:35+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 143389011, 143389015, 143389026, 143389029, 143389030, 143389032, 143389033, 143389035, 143389037, 143389039, 143389040, 143389042, 143389045, 143389053, 143389076, 143389078, 143389080.
Glassman (2023-10-31 21:02:38+00:00): #TIP: square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q" - they will look more professional that way.

I removed the access=no on Sutter lane southeast. Basically access=no means that no one is permitted to drive or walk on it. It mostly likely is privately maintained in that case you can add and operator= tag if you want.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143391630
woodpeck_repair (2023-10-30 23:18:41+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 143277340, 143278115, 143278119, 143278144, 143278172.
Warin61 (2023-11-06 23:31:58+00:00): Hi,
Construction relation 16622825 deleted as the outer ways shared segments. Retagged ways with 'landuse=construction' - this is simpler and easier to edit in future.
Glassman (2023-10-31 20:58:13+00:00): I changed this to a service road. OSM got started in England so we use their road classifications. Unclassified is just a rural residential road. Service seems more appropriate unless a local government maintains it.

Also it was connected to the roundabout - I connected it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143391932
gdt (2023-10-30 23:43:06+00:00): I put in a note rather than editing because I was only able to see the end while driving (passengering - I try not to map and drive!) from Causeway street.   I wonder if you are able to see the road well enough in imagery, or if you observed it on the ground, or somehing else?
jakerbreaker (2023-10-31 00:07:22+00:00): I marked based on imagery, the road in the section mentioned appears too dark to be unpaved, and to my eye seems to have a painted line - This is something I can check in person tomorrow to be 100% sure
gdt (2023-10-31 00:13:51+00:00): If you think you can resolve it on imagery, and fair point about the line, that's totally fine.   You might also note the specific surface as while paved is ok, it's broad.  Most roads here are "surface=asphalt".    At the risk of sending you down a different rabbit hole, StreetComplete is interesting (android app, perhaps also iOS but idk).
Filip009 (2023-10-31 07:16:37+00:00): Ahoj, super, že prispievaš do OpenStreetMap.

Názvy predajní sa píšu kapitálkami len výnimočne, preto prosím uprav názov obchodu https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11301160645

Ak máš nejaké ďalšie otázky neváhaj sa spýtať v slovenskej OSM komunite https://groups.google.com/g/osm_sk.
dcapillae (2023-10-31 03:24:33+00:00): Buenos días.

Este conjunto de cambios fue revertido. El hotel ya está en el mapa.

Por favor, no introduzca objetos duplicados.

Gracias por su colaboración.

Atentamente,

Daniel Capilla
John Sinclair (2023-10-31 09:10:49+00:00): Thanks for filling in more detail in my suburb.
Metzor (2023-10-31 07:14:49+00:00): Hallo Gudensberger,

Sei doch so nett und halte deine Änderungssätze geografisch etwas kleiner.

Wieso? Schau mal hier:
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Danke für's in Erwägung ziehen und fröhliches Mappen,
Metzor
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-12-01 22:24:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 175378570 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some pre war Polish names; these do not belong in OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19062
Matt_ (2023-10-31 00:34:38+00:00): Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/US_National_Inventory_of_Dams#Identifying_and_tagging_dams_in_the_United_States
VigilantPenguin (2023-10-31 16:23:55+00:00): Hi there, looks like the western sidewalk on the Montlake Blvd overpass is open as of early yesterday. However, I see you surveyed it yesterday so just wanted to confirm with you whether this was the case or not?
LockOnGuy (2023-10-31 23:46:00+00:00): ڕاستی, I see you delete name:ar tags again here like many times before. I asked you to stop such behavior many times. Please stop such edits.           
You shared 3 screenshots of 3 street signs as a source for your edit to remove the 49 correct 'name:ar' here. It is true that we edit what's on the ground but did you actually survey the whole 10km street and see there is no sign with 'name:ar'?    
I understand you don't like the Arabic language as you removed thousands of Arabic names before through the years even from place=* nodes like for example https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/63498102 but this is not ok to do here in OSM. OSM is not your own map exclusively, it's an open collaboration, Arabic is a language that is spoken by almost all Iraqis including most of the Kurdish population, It is the official language of the country and also an official language by the Kurdistan region government https://archive.gov.krd/dfr/dfr.gov.krd/p/p9728.html#:~:text=Language-,The%20Kurdistan%20Region%E2%80%99s%20official%20languages%20for%20government%20purposes%20are%20Kurdish%20and%20Arabic.,-The%20two%20most, so removing such data is considered as vandalism.          
I also see you changed name:en here from "Barzani Nemir Street" to "Barzani Nemir Str", please don't abbreviate names like that, if the name can be spelled without an abbreviation, then don't abbreviate it.     
I will restore the name:ar names that you deleted from ways and restore the name:en names without the abbreviation.       
Again, please stop deleting name:ar tags, DWG volunteers is currently busy with the vandalism that is happening now in Israel and I don't want them to waste time on you. If you continue the vandalism to the point that I'm wasting time just to restore valid data you removed then I have no choice other than to report you, and you will be blocked just like last time when you removed name:ar tags.      
Regards.
ڕاستی (2023-11-04 22:17:01+00:00): 1. I deleted because it is not on the street sign. And it is not just three, is it six images of the street sign and they are not screenshot, it's surveying images, here:

1)https://drive.google.com/file/d/18YV6bfAj5zKtlakKkzEUXN07_BMIQ8Ev/view
2)https://drive.google.com/file/d/16uEg7PYQsgLZctobThSbTb8FRsBEalwg/view
3)https://drive.google.com/file/d/1EDv8CHmODrAW-IS6mA9j4ukHss51YSfy/view
4)https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ndchhyC9sjFRZbEnGMP31ppIkqogbHUG/view
5)https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ILo-C_gpefiEEML8meQtPdpS-H4WPzaj/view?usp=drive_link
6)https://drive.google.com/file/d/1L1x0-u2GEL59CqJae7HU1DEwPv-Kkxew/view?usp=drive_link

And I will ask you stop transliterate anything you edit and add Arabic names that does not exist.
The Arabic names you added before are not correct, you just translated to Arabic.
And I understand that you hate Kurdish and thinking like a conquer, as you adding Arabic names randomly and names things as you want see as and example (w995218377) (شارع القاضي غازي), it is not okay on OSM.
OSM is not your own map and act like a boss.
"Arabic is a language that is spoken by almost all Iraqis including most of the Kurdish population" Just tell when you did this analytics (wow).

Kurdish language is official language in entire Iraq and Kurdistan see
https://iq.parliament.iq/ku/%d8%af%d9%87-%d8%b3%d8%aa%d9%88%d8%b1/.
Then removing such data and adding any that is not on the ground is vandalism.

I will remove any names that is not on the ground and before removing I surveyed and take pics then removed.
If you do not stop I will report you as a vandal user for making up stories for just adding things that not on the ground.

And if you really right then survey and upload pics of the signs for streets you talking about.
LockOnGuy (2023-11-04 22:39:00+00:00): >they are not screenshot, it's surveying images    
     
  The title of the images are literally named "screenshots" and they have different resolutions proving they were screenshotted from a video.       
And who say there are the only signs for this long road? And did you actually surevy asking the people in Arabic if they know the name or not?      
          
    
    
>I will ask you stop transliterate anything you edit  and add Arabic names that does not exist.   
    
  Names I added are valid and correct. Most of them are based on eye survey, and the rest based on asking people on the ground about what the street name and whatever they answer in Arabic that is the street name, and with my knowledge in Kurdish and English, the Arabic names I got from the local people are matching the Kurdish and the English names.      
     
    
Again, please stop this behavior. And do not delete valid data again.      
      
Regards.
ڕاستی (2023-11-04 23:27:59+00:00): "Names I added are valid and correct. Most of them are based on eye survey, and the rest based on asking people on the ground"

If a Persian person live here and another Persian one ask about street name First one will change (street to خیابان) and the result (خیابان بارزانی نمیر) but is really on the ground, No.

"And who say there are the only signs for this long road? And did you actually surevy asking the people in Arabic if they know the name or not?"
Yes I surveyed the whole street.
Then when you deleted Kurdish names from Baghdad street did you asked Kurdish people, because there are so many Kurdish living Baghdad and other cities.
Street names are based on street signs, did you forgot what were you saying about Street Signs.
LockOnGuy (2023-11-04 23:41:30+00:00): Persian is not local, spoken nor official language in Iraq or the Kurdistan region, Arabic is spoken, on signs, and an official language by law to the Kurdistan region, and it is on street signs.       
For example minutes ago I edited the name of a way in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143632885 and used https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=698075201557059&lat=36.180405656461&lng=44.008308851292&z=17&focus=photo as a source, you can see the sign on the right has Arabic.     
Same goes for changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143632751 that I made minutes ago too with the https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=448888126789551&lat=36.180097344489&lng=44.023394868421065&z=17&focus=photo as source.
If there is some signs of the street that do not have Arabic, that doesn't justify the removal of Arabic language from the street.       
Baghdad is different, almost no one speak or read Kurdish, and the street sign do not has Kurdish language on them, you can go around the entire the city and you won't find a single Kurdish word in the streets, which is the opposites of Erbil where there is Arabic names on the Street signs and shops etc.     
Regards.
ڕاستی (2023-11-04 23:58:50+00:00): I took Persian as an example.

There is a few streets has Arabic names, But the 99% does not.
LockOnGuy (2023-11-05 00:05:46+00:00): Removing valid names that can be spoken by locals, and on street signs, and consider as an official language by the kurdistan region is considered vandalism like the way you did in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143633135       
This is the last time I'm gonna ask to restore the valid names.       
Regards.
KevinOs (2023-10-31 05:58:27+00:00): For the love of god buddy please stop vandalizing, adding details that don't exist, removing details that do, you are editing areas you are not familiar with at all and it helps no one.
022 (2023-11-01 02:07:34+00:00): Agree with the above comment. and next time maybe don't go all the way across the province editing random stuff making these huge changeset boxes. I've tried messaging you, comment on your stuff, you don't respond to anything.
woodpeck (2023-10-31 01:25:03+00:00): Hallo Eure Majestät, Ihr habt hier einen Parkscheinautomaten mit dem Namen "Parkscheinautomat" eingetragen - aber ohne die Tags, die es einer Software erlauben würden, zu verstehen, worum es geht! Richtig wäre amenity=vending_machine, vending=parking_tickets wie hier beschrieben https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dvending_machine - und das "Name"-Feld bitte leer lassen, ausser wenn einer dieser Automaten wirklich mal einen Eigennamen hätte, was sicherlich sehr selten vorkommt.
citrula (2023-10-31 05:28:06+00:00): Hello sprrocket,
Welcome to OSM! The name tag should only be used when the feature is referred to that commonly - it's ok for objects not to have a name! You can read about it on the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name

Happy mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143395854
KiloThree (2023-11-04 00:22:52+00:00): Hi, thanks for mapping! Wanted to point out 2 things I noticed
- You updated the `train` tag on Sullivan Station. `train=yes` isn't typically used for subway stops that other trains don't stop at, per the wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:train

- Your changes cover a couple of different areas. Various tools for looking at history in OSM use bounding boxes to decide if a change impacts an area. These are close enough together that I'm not actually concerned by it, but wanted to highlight it for the future
siguida (2023-11-04 01:12:12+00:00): Oh thanks for the note on the train tag KiloThree! I didn't add that myself (it might've just been added automatically with the template). As for the bounding boxes, I'm either hyper-specific or all over the place with my edits (for this I just happened to be working on a personal project with Metrodreamin', which also uses OSM, and it caught my attention). I'll definitely keep aware of both these things though!
Siguida
mataharimau (2023-10-31 07:37:42+00:00): Hi LakeArendsee, tq for your contributions. This is a small matter to bring up - just wanna discuss re "Dual Carriageway recommendations" ie: 

"Roads are not to be mapped as dual carriageways if the two directions are only separated by paint." (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Dual_carriageway)

Any specific reason you want this junction mapped as dual carriageway?
LakeArendsee (2023-11-02 00:47:46+00:00): Hi mataharimau, thanks for reaching out! Based on Esri World Imagery, there is a channelized turning lane connecting Jalan Hulu Tinggi 26/6 and Jalan TP 7. We can also see the slip road in ground level imagery (https://kartaview.org/map/@3.0416175757275994,101.55371136784947,19z). I modeled this road as a tertiary link as it best fits the OSM definition of a link (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_link). I hope that helps!
mataharimau (2023-11-04 01:52:48+00:00): Hey, thks for replying.

I appreciate diverse views and the last thing that I want is if two people reversed each other's changes.

From your link (*emphasis is mine): "_link tags should also be used for *physical channelization* of turning traffic lanes at traffic signal junctions and in roundabout designs that *physically separate* a specific turn from the main roundabout."

I interprete "physical separation" as the presence of eg a road curb divider and that "paint separation" does not warrant a separate highway (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Malaysian_Roads_Tagging).

I'm not saying my interpretation is right and that everybody should follow me; if most Malaysian mappers don't see it that way, then I should cease deleting channelised lanes separated by paint because my deletes will only eventually get undone.
LakeArendsee (2023-11-07 14:42:17+00:00): Hi mataharimau, thank you for providing further insight on this issue. I initially was not given the impression that dividing roads based on paint was a community-driven practice. I recognize now after further investigation that it is. I will proceed with removing the tertiary_link and will refrain from making these highway splits in the future. Thank you!
mataharimau (2023-11-09 06:55:39+00:00): Tq dear mapper! OSM is so rich and detailed that we constantly learn new things as we go along no matter how experienced we are.

Just to cue you in why I brought this subject up in case you're not aware - I deleted that channelized road link and then 1 day later, I noticed that it was back up again!
LakeArendsee (2023-11-10 12:47:27+00:00): Thank you for the explanation. Happy Mapping!
OrDal (2023-11-25 16:51:26+00:00): Hi,
You added a point for the city of Rafah in Northern Siani, Egypt, with population of 80823.
The city was destroyed and displaced by Egyptian Army from 2017. So, place=city and population=80823 are not relavent anymore.
Please fix this.
user_11609320 (2023-10-31 03:17:20+00:00): if using rapid editor, please be aware that not all AI placed roads are valid. it is using old data sets. still requires verification
emersonveenstra (2023-10-31 10:46:47+00:00): Removed, located nowhere near Maple Park Drive
arjunaraoc (2023-12-07 12:25:03+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia) From a privacy angle, it is better not to post identifiable information like name, phone number etc.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143398005
Glassman (2023-10-31 21:03:36+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143398172
user_5359 (2023-11-02 07:48:27+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I remove your entry, because this node is outside of the USA.
CurlingMan13 (2024-10-16 04:56:49+00:00): Abbreviation (PAC) will need to be expanded.  "PAC NYC" should be the alternate.  Essentially, alt_name= and name= should be swapped.
Thibaultmol (2023-11-02 07:41:26+00:00): Hi Sacha,
I noticed that in this changeset and in another one you included pictures of a bicycle pump with a thumbs up or thumbs down. It's best not to do that because if at some point that changes (it's fixed or it's broken) then the images will no longer be accurate. it's best to take regular images and use an openstreetmap tag on the object itself to indicate if it's broken or not. Also welcome to OSM!
SachaBe (2023-11-02 07:51:54+00:00): Hello, I wasn't sure about adding them or not especially because Cyclofix doesn't display the date the picture was taken :-/
But then the same would apply with posting pictures of broken elements, right?
I think it's helpful to know in what state they are, but I couldn't find the right way to do it. What's your thought?
Thibaultmol (2023-11-02 10:15:53+00:00): That's fair yeah. Still, that's why complete has one of the questions for bicycle pumps in cyclofix: "Is the bike pump still operational?" which is the best method of putting that in osm
SachaBe (2023-11-02 10:20:23+00:00): I'll remove my thumbs until there's a better way to handle that :)
Cheers
Thibaultmol (2023-11-02 11:16:44+00:00): The service:bicycle:pump:operational_status=broken that can be applied through mapcomplete is the best method atm. Thx for your contributions btw !
user_5359 (2023-10-31 11:22:08+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I remove your SEO SPAM entry (mostly foreign keys). Please have a look on https://wiki.osm.org!
GeeMaps! (2023-10-31 06:54:56+00:00): Thanks for your work, but when you finish mapping a building, please hit your "Q" button, which will make it square. Thanks!
Hjart (2023-10-31 17:59:50+00:00): Please note that only part of the building is all that tall: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25520647
Please also note that we're counting a little bit different than you.
AndyB_66 (2023-10-31 13:34:45+00:00): Wciąż nazwy Twoich edycji są bezużyteczne (patrz https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian). Dostosuj się, proszę, do zasad, obowiązujących na OSM.
map per (2023-11-06 20:14:23+00:00): Hallo Waldwicht_1,

und wilkommen beim OpenStreetMap Wiki Projekt.

Die Orte die du in Maps.me eingetragen hast wurden direkt in die öffentliche OpenStreetMap (OSM) Datenbank hochgeladen.

Gibt es hier (1) wirklich einen öffentlichen Picknickplatz mit z.B. Bänken, etc. ? Auf den Luftbildern ist dort nichts zu sehen.

Danke und viele Grüße
map per

PS:
Du kannst über den Link in der Email auf diese Nachfrage antworten.

(1) https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11301625269
map per (2023-11-06 20:48:11+00:00): Hab eine Antwort als PM bekommen: Dort gibt es einen überdachten Tisch mit 2 Bänken
Danil (2023-11-08 00:48:15+00:00): this road connecting trunk highway with Kecamatan (district) center, thats why it need to be secondary highway. Check https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Indonesia#Tagging_conventions