piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Bruno Arina (2025-04-20 15:33:55+00:00): Buongiorno Andrea, ho visto che hai cancellato il tag "name" da tre ways della relazione.  Io trovavo utile la pratica di inserire il numero del sentiero nelle way (dove possibile) oltre che nella relazione, in quanto così viene renderizzato sulle carte e un numero di tre cifre non è pesante da vedere.  Tu lo disapprovi?
ivanbranco (2025-04-20 15:53:23+00:00): Il numero del percorso identifica il percorso in toto e va aggiunto come ref=* nella relazione. I singoli sentieri non hanno nome e quindi non va aggiunto. È considerato mappare per il rendering. Appoggio la modifica di Andrea.
Andrea Del Sarto (2025-04-20 16:11:26+00:00): Ciao Bruno,
non è corretto per diversi motivi, oltre a quello indicato ivanbranco; inserire il valore del tag ref nel tag name è sbagliato, inoltre per visualizzare le info dei percorsi è possibile usare layer dedicati come per esempio waymarkedtrails.org o gli applicativi sviluppati dal Club Alpino Italiano.
Non è questione di disapprovare ma seguire le linee guida previste per l'inserimento dei percorsi escursionistici, che puoi trovare qui: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:CAI

saluti e buona mappatura
silversurfer83 (2025-04-15 17:16:31+00:00): Hello Holly,

thank you for your work.

There are some things I need to point out:

- You moved a tree somewhere in the USA. I guess unintentional. Please watch out when panning the map in edit mode.

- pavements: Please read the wiki on pavements and revisit your pavements. You added some "layer=1" and I guess that's because the editor gave a warning. Please do not simply click the easiest solution but check the spot the editor has seen as questionable and read carefully what the problem *could* be. After that, try to find the right solution. Simply adding "layer=1" ("this is above/below") is not the right answer here.

If you have questions, please reach out. We are at c.osm.org or try the chat groups. Links below

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sidewalk

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contact_channels#Chats.2Fmessengers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164911893
hendrik-17 (2025-04-15 18:19:53+00:00): Moin,

und Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap!

Du hast hier in diesem Änderungssatz einige Dinge gelöscht, z.B. Adressen, Infotafeln u.a.

Dabei dürfte es sich wohl um ein Versehen handeln, denn die meisten Dinge sind vor Ort wohl noch vorhanden/korrekt?
Ich habe die Änderungen deshalb revertiert.

Dabei wurde auch der von dir eingetragene Supermarkt (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12752992668) und die Toilette (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12752992666) gelöscht.
Der Supermarkt wird wohl so auch nicht existieren.
Falls du mit der Toilette Informationen zu der Toilette im Dorfgemeinschaftshaus eintragen wolltest, müsstest du das leider noch einmal machen (oder einen entsprechenden Hinweis erstellen).

Beste Grüße

hendrik-17
kartler175 (2025-04-14 15:38:48+00:00): Da ist wohl einiges schiefgegangen:
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=11.90282&lat=52.59044&zoom=18&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.95&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways
 Sieht mir ganz nache ienem missglückten Import aus. Jede Menge verwaister Knoten/überschneidende Linien. 
Bitte unbedingt JOSM-Validator beachten.
SafetyIng (2025-04-14 18:38:44+00:00): Hey, ja, war ein Problem beim Upload aus JOSM, hier gab es keine Validator-Meldungen, ich werde das nachher noch bereinigen.
Szymson (2025-04-14 15:33:02+00:00): Dyskusyjne, tam nie ma mostu drogowego tylko przepust w ciągu rowu
Vinber-Pro (2025-07-02 09:41:23+00:00): Bonjour,
je pense ici que c'est bien landuse=education et non pas amenity=school.

Les 2 écoles (maternelle et élémentaire) sont effectivement définies 
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5038843937
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5038843938

le landuse=education englobe les 2, en primaire (car élémentaire+maternelle) mais ce n'est pas 1 école

on repasse sur du landuse=education ?

à plus
abdoucondorcet (2025-07-02 10:15:57+00:00): Bonjour,
si j'ai bien compris, comme il y a 2 écoles (élémentaire et maternelle), il vaut mieux recourir à landuse=education, dans la mesure où amenity=school ne correspondrait qu'à une seule école (et non pas 2) ?
Mais dans ce cas, école primaire n'équivaut-il pas lui-même à amenity=school ?
J'avoue mes limites dans cette situation. Je te laisse (lâchement) trancher !
Bonne journée à toi
Szymson (2025-04-14 15:28:44+00:00): Szlabany powinny być połączone z linią highway a nie stać luzem
grzegorz75jan (2025-04-14 16:00:55+00:00): No pewnie bo inaczej są tylko nic nie znaczącym obiektem na mapie.

Szlabany jak i droga za szlabanem powinna mieć jakiś access najczęściej private bo np. mapy.com (dawne cz) po prostu zignorują taki szlaban jeżeli nie ma access czy innej restrykcji jak np. w przypadku lasów.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164912823
grzegorz75jan (2025-04-14 16:05:53+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:barrier
dadavid (2025-05-29 21:46:45+00:00): Vandalismus reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166944413
Szymson (2025-04-14 15:19:56+00:00): "zmiany" to nie jest odpowiedni opis zestawu zmian
Szymson (2025-04-14 15:21:04+00:00): Poza tym to na pewno nie jest most drogowy tylko przepust w ciągu rowu
grzegorz75jan (2025-04-14 16:08:21+00:00): Opis zmian w stylu, zmiany, parking to faktycznie dużo mówi.

https://youtu.be/xBMIoypkdI4?list=PLTgtPjgzssHzsgAqYbi2QfRoRk1S9ioX5&t=2596

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164913023
Szymson (2025-04-14 15:21:36+00:00): Numer budynku powinien być spójny w obu adresach (duża litera)
elsy1 (2025-04-15 06:30:37+00:00): reverted vandal edits 164913063, 164913099, 164913156, 164913179
nona mostafa (2025-04-15 14:27:30+00:00): Hi Amineee__,
I hope this message finds you well.
I noticed that you added the value "TAH 1" to the "ref" tag on some ways; for example:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/156403630
Please note that "TAH 1" represents the international Ref number (int_ref=TAH 1) rather than a local ref for Morocco's "ref" tag. I think this value must be added to the Int_ref tag, not the ref tag. You can find more information about this in the following links:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:int_ref
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trans-African_Highway_network.
If you agree with me, could you please make the necessary modifications? If you have different information, please share that with me.
I look forward to collaborating with you to enhance OSM further.
Best regards,
nona mostafa
user_22463405 (2025-04-21 20:24:53+00:00): Sorry for replying late 
I found TAH1 in Int_ref so I did anything
nona mostafa (2025-04-23 10:42:40+00:00): Hi Amineee__,
Thank you for your response. I would like to clarify that during the delay in receiving your reply, we proceeded with the necessary adjustments and completed the repair process (int_ref=TAH 1).
We appreciate your attention to this matter and look forward to your continued support.
Best regards,
nona mostafa
bxl-forever (2025-04-13 22:40:11+00:00): Gateau was already on the map here
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12718985279, your edit creates a duplicate within the same building.

Organic Maps does not show all the existing/current data, please always check against live data first.
maro21 (2025-04-14 21:00:13+00:00): Było dobrze. Znak ustąp pierwszeństwa dotyczy sytuacji, kiedy światła nie działają.
pavvv (2025-04-14 21:11:01+00:00): Czy większość popularnych aplikacji tak to interpretuje? W razie czego jest oczywiste, że ustąp pierwszeństwa obowiązuje jedynie podczas wyłączonych świateł, choć z kolei tego tagowania chyba żadna aplikacja nie zrozumie.
maro21 (2025-04-14 21:00:17+00:00): Było dobrze. Znak ustąp pierwszeństwa dotyczy sytuacji, kiedy światła nie działają.
rskedgell (2025-04-14 06:06:34+00:00): (Review requested)

Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for updating your details. That looks fine to me.
WBSKI (2025-04-23 17:19:52+00:00): Hi, what is the source of the ski area addition? I was just there and there is no trace of a ski area. From some searching I think this ski area only existed temporarily in 2008: https://www.merkur.de/lokales/muenchen/keine-pistengaudi-muellberg-2591085.html
b-jazz (2025-04-14 01:27:11+00:00): Hey there GatewayGolf. It's awesome that you are creating multipolygons when the fairway completely encloses the green (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1377317684 for example). But don't forget to add the bunker as another "inner" member that multipolygon. Thanks!
GatewayGolf (2025-04-15 00:33:58+00:00): 👍 Fixed. I seem to remember having trouble getting that to work with iD in the past, but seems to work fine now. I'll do it from now on. Thanks!
b-jazz (2025-04-15 05:21:42+00:00): Fantastic. Thanks. If you run into the problem again, leave it alone and let me take a look at it and see if I can't help understand the problem so that I can come up with better instructions in the future. Thanks.
NieWnen (2025-04-13 23:54:36+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing:island

`crossing:island=yes` jest w takim przypadku nieprawidłowe – dajemy tylko tam gdzie przejście nie jest rozdzielone
NieWnen (2025-04-13 23:55:20+00:00): *jezdnie nie są rozdzielone
user_5359 (2025-06-28 17:00:11+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice the value of the key opening_hours has the start and endtime of the busines hours (something like Mo-Fr 09:00-17:00 with 24 hours notation). If you need help, You are welcome!
ticho2 (2025-04-16 13:28:48+00:00): Ahoj, odporucam namiesto toho kratkeho "no access" useku na tej ceste spravit len node typu barrier=block, s prislusnymi access hodnotami, vid https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dblock

A ked uz si tam, asi by bolo fajn skontrolovat aj juzny koniec toho useku, ten node "no exit" mi tam z leteckych snimkov nedava zmysel. Ale to len tak mimochodom, to je na dalsiu nezavislu zmenu. :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164916045
BubbaJuice (2026-06-04 05:14:03+00:00): The way that you made here is not a bridge. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1377330058 Please avoid making false bridges such as these.
Thank you,
BubbaJuice
b-jazz (2025-04-15 05:03:59+00:00): As I mentioned in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162300773, you are mapping the greens incorrectly when you share all of the nodes between the green and fairway when the fairway goes completely around the green. You should either draw the fringe, or you should exclude the green when drawing the fairway, but then and only then should you share the nodes between the fairway/green border. If you don't understand, please reach out and we can work to make it clear. Thanks.
felipeeugenio (2025-04-14 22:39:51+00:00): Hola William. Qué tal?
Con @jptolosa dibujamos hace unos meses esta carretera completa, con lujo de detalles, con unos planos que nos facilitaron. Hasta los postes SOS y paraderos tenía.
La Ruta, cuando tenía una calzada era un trunk, pero ahora va a quedar como motorway en la medida que se vaya habilitando.
Como vives en la zona, te vas a enterar antes que todos de cuándo va a pasar esto y en qué tramos.
Pero vemos que los dejaste en trunk, borrando el tag de la construcción de motorway.
Queríamos saber cómo estabas pensando esas ediciones.
Además hablas de mejorar el ruteo. No sabemos muy bien a qué te refieres.
Saludos
b-jazz (2025-04-15 05:25:14+00:00): Hi there Aeuri,

I think your creation of multipolygon relations for where greens and fairways meet makes things more complex than they should be. It's best to draw a complete green and complete fairway and share nodes that are on the border of the two objects. iD and other editors should highlight the other object if you get the cursor close to another node. Give it a try and let me know if you have any issues. Thanks.
user_5359 (2025-04-17 17:50:33+00:00): Hello (again)! What is the mean of the tag "_nom_usuel_parc": "Parc éolien de Saulnois"?
Olyon (2025-04-17 18:08:31+00:00): Sorry (again). I fixed it. It's from the data source and I forgot to change it to name=*.
h551w (2025-04-14 01:20:09+00:00): Finally got around to reprojecting some photos I took on a flight out of Boise. Middleton Road south of the roundabout still needs to be updated more, I couldn't quite get a read on what they did with the lanes with my blurry picture
Norbert Dichter (2025-04-14 09:13:46+00:00): Hello, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. Thank you for your contribution. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. Or just hit the Q-key.
Also please keep in mind: many buildings are very close but do not actually touch each other, try to map them close to each other without letting them connect or share nodes with each other, roads, or residential area outlines. In the iD web editor, holding down the "alt" key will keep nodes from "snapping" to each other and accidentally connecting.  Thanks so much for your contribution, Norbert 'Nodi' Dichter, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164917597
Norbert Dichter (2025-04-14 17:26:40+00:00): Hello, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. Thank you for your contribution. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. Or just hit the Q-key.
Also please keep in mind: many buildings are very close but do not actually touch each other, try to map them close to each other without letting them connect or share nodes with each other, roads, or residential area outlines. In the iD web editor, holding down the "alt" key will keep nodes from "snapping" to each other and accidentally connecting.  Thanks so much for your contribution, Norbert 'Nodi' Dichter, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164917780
Hermi2025 (2025-04-14 02:37:47+00:00): 依据：校区范围的确定

部分高校存在家属院landuse=residential、研究所amenity=research_institute、附属学校amenity=school等复杂情况。
若该设施完全位于学校内部，在进出都需使用大学的进出道路，但有明确的围墙和门的限制，则应将大学作为复合多边形，令该区域作为inner；
5m4u9 (2025-04-16 01:32:16+00:00): Hola, gracias por mejorar esas partes en el aeropuerto. 

Vos estás confundiendo el nombre con el código. Tiene sentido que el nombre sea auxiliar u otro, pero el código debe seguir siendo E.

De todas formas qué genial que hayas añadido el nombre, no hay mucha info ni planos oficiales de los aeropuertos en bolivia y hay que hacer arqueología... 😑
Cristhyan (2025-04-16 05:26:51+00:00): Te cuento que no, la calle de rodaje no se llama E puesto que esta está asignada para una que se tiene previsto construir en el futuro, esa en una calle de rodaje cerrada que se usa para el acceso al hangar de LAB, soy trabajador de este aeropuerto jeje
5m4u9 (2025-04-16 15:35:29+00:00): Muchas gracias por responder y por la aclaración.  Pero como puede ser posible que haya la pista F y G y no la E? 🤔 por eso cuando añadí el código E a esa vía supuse esa correlación porque no hay otra pista más. Por el momento queda fuera.

Como trabajas ahí tengo un millón de preguntas... la primera hay algún plano o mapa "oficial" para ver detalles de luces, equipos, instalaciones, las antenas, etc? o por lo menos donde se tendría que el a perdir esa info?... algunas cosas obtuve haciendo arqueología en la web del sicoes, de páginaes del exterior, planos de simuladores y de amistades que trabajaban en el lloyd.

El mapa de OSM del aeropuerto, es uno de los mejor mapeados de Bolivia, con muchos equipos y detalles, pero falta mucha info. Por favor, si vez algo raro no dudes en mejorar o colocar una "nota" (con el 2do ícono desde abajo de la barrita de la derecha), algunos nombres no son los oficiales o son los que escuché alguna vez.
Cristhyan (2025-04-17 04:56:26+00:00): Claro, me puedes contactar cuando gustes para esos daros ya que es informacion bastante complicada de conseguir
JJIglesias (2025-04-17 08:36:08+00:00): La carta de Jeppesen del Aeropuerto Jorge Wilsterman es información oficial derivada del AIP de Bolivia.
5m4u9 (2025-04-17 16:13:56+00:00): No conocía eso, viendo un video se ve interesante. Pero parece ser info cerrada y privada :(.
Cristhyan (2025-04-17 22:07:21+00:00): La cuestion es que tanto en las cartas Jeppesen como en el AIP hay informacion operativa y no asi los datos georeferenciales que estamos buscando aca
JJIglesias (2025-04-19 04:31:50+00:00): Cierto, pero si te muestran las numeraciones y nomeclatura oficial de los posiciones en la rampa de la Plataforma principal que No estan en el mapa, por ejemplo...
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-05 08:11:52+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/671676471/history has shop = fruit that was added in this edit
shop=fruit ? Maybe shop=greengrocer was intended? If they truly sell solely only fruit then maybe extra tag like greengrocer=fruit would be better? If they sell also vegetables then https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=greengrocer is definitely better.

shop=greengrocer is far more widely used and supported and does fit even if only variety of fruits is sold.

But maybe another shop tag would fit better? Maybe shop=farm? ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=farm )
Alliegaytor (2025-04-14 04:52:05+00:00): Hi Tadhg,

Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. Just letting you know that in this changeset you broke the order (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:route#Order_matters) of ways in the 411 and 412 bus route relations (i.e. the ways in the relation were not continuous and had gaps).

I've fixed the issue in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164920068.

As I understand it, iD editor doesn't do a good enough job warning you if you've broken routes, so you might want to take care and manually double check the order of ways in the bus routes after editing them.
Taya_S (2025-04-14 05:48:18+00:00): Hello mranderson2025,

Please respond to the questions asked of you in earlier changesets and in DM's instead of starting an edit war.
mranderson2025 (2025-04-15 03:24:11+00:00): https://drive.google.com/file/d/1VffKoiyQjrk6IVn92oCCXX6nBooPIHSz/view?usp=sharing
"The Kowloon Ranges ends in the east at Cha Liu Au, which is the southern foot of Kowloon Peak. Further south of the mountain pass, another mountain range emerges, starting from Lung Wo Shan and ending at Tan Shan Teng, Round Hill (Tai Sheung Tok) and then Black Hill."
Kovoschiz (2025-04-15 06:37:58+00:00): Text alone can't prove anything. You can't tell what's where, especially with how much the terrain has been altered here. The date describe is unknown. Their source is also not given. Heights are missing as well.
Kovoschiz (2025-04-15 06:39:08+00:00): Even it's true historically, reminder again `name=` is what's commonly used by the public now. Please add historical names to OHM.
mranderson2025 (2025-04-15 09:07:42+00:00): What do you mean by "now"? Every day that passes by becomes history. How current does the data need to be for you? We can only go by what is accurate. That book is already the most recent accurate account for places.
Kovoschiz (2025-04-15 11:19:13+00:00): You response makes no sense. This is not a 
philosophical discussion. Why is Tan Shan Teng mentioned by it? 
You didn't answer how to tell their exact position. If this is the most accurate you can get, it's not accurate enough.
Taya_S (2025-04-15 14:07:40+00:00): See: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17552

OSM has an in-depth information how we name things. This is well worth a read: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names

For avoidance of doubt: In order to occupy the name=* tag, the name needs to be commonly used by people. It cannot be just a name on some paper that no one actually uses, and it cannot be a name that was used half a century ago but is no longer relevant.

The source of this changeset is 'survey', and as we talked about in our DM's, the easiest way to show what the current name is, is simply visiting the place and seeing what the signs say. 

You’ve been blocked for being a sockpuppet of protecthknames, but based on your behaviour,  and unwillingness to have honest discussions, you were already on a clear path toward a block regardless.

Best regards, 
Taya Snijder, on behalf of OSM’s Data Working Group
Frans S (2025-04-14 14:23:47+00:00): Thanks for mapping. Rather accurate.
Please don't connect nodes of buildings to other objects like area borders.
Best regards and keep mapping
Svalbard (2025-04-14 08:19:55+00:00): Hallo zolarphoenix, Du hast bei einigen Fuß- und Radwegen den Untergrund (surface) spezifiziert. Das ist nur sinnvoll, wenn die Beläge unterschiedlich sind. Das sind sie in diesen Fällen aber nicht, wie Du es selbst eingetragen hast. Außerdem ist die Eigenschaft des Untergrundes bereits an dem Weg vorhanden (surface=paving_stones). Kannst Du bitte Deine Eintragungen entsprechend korrigieren. Vielen Dank! Gruß Svalbard
zolarphoenix (2025-04-14 10:25:04+00:00): Hallo Svalbard, ich habe die Eintragungen entfernt. Die Anpassung wurde mir von StreetComplete vorgeschlagen. Viele Grüße, zolarphoenix
jmarchon (2025-04-14 23:00:27+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164959980
Jaiden1254 (2025-04-15 04:38:41+00:00): There were three incorrect tagging for brand error though you didn’t add those in this Changeset
rempshaener (2025-04-14 19:26:54+00:00): Hallo,

du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Näheres zum Tagging von Trafostationen findest du hier: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:power%3Dsubstation#Beispiele

Entsprechend wäre das hier
man_made=street_cabinet
utility=power
power=substation
substation=minor_distribution

und der name – der kein richtiger Name ist – müsste raus.

Bei Fragen bitte melden.

Viele Grüße
mcliquid (2025-04-14 06:44:15+00:00): Siehe Kommentar in: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4691157
micheleOSM3 (2026-01-11 07:31:30+00:00): In OSM, the name=* tag must contain the current and official or commonly used name of the object.
The value you used seems a description
NorthCrab_upload (2025-04-14 06:20:54+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12729473815
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1374808999

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Jrachi (2025-04-16 08:42:38+00:00): Ciao.
Perché hai cancellato la strada?
È parte di un percorso escursionistico a catasto nazionale.
Ivo
itineralp (2025-04-16 08:47:39+00:00): Ciao.
Perché non esiste (o quantomeno, non esiste più). Sono passato domenica scorsa ed il bosco ha cancellato il passaggio (ridotto a qualche traccia tra piante e rovi)