piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Đuro Jiří (2024-05-08 07:36:49+00:00): Correggi tu questa rotonda, oppure ti serve aiuto? Visto che hai aggiunto nuova rotonda, però hai lasciato tutti vecchie strade.
Đuro Jiří (2024-05-17 20:17:52+00:00): Ho fatto il sopralluogo e migliorato le rotonde.
nikospag (2024-05-09 10:21:31+00:00): reverted
nikospag (2024-05-09 10:33:48+00:00): Changeset reverted
eggie (2024-05-07 14:56:54+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback  Het restaurant heb ik samengevoegd met adresnode nr 2.
Heeft het pand werkelijk deze vorm?
Het is niet de bedoeling om zo'n lange beschrijving te geven. 
MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-05-07 15:04:17+00:00): BAG vorm gebouw hersteld
eggie (2024-05-07 15:14:52+00:00): No advertising

The description should only include neutral and factual information about the object. It should not include subjective evaluations, e.g. "the best restaurant in town", "modern, comfortable hotel, in the heart of the city". Do not use description=* for advertising messages. They will be removed as spam and may also have further consequences for your OSM account.
Metzor (2024-05-08 04:24:46+00:00): Hallo jf_simon,

Da war wohl noch der Weg in Heiligenbronn markiert, als du die Garage rechtwinklig gemacht hast...

Magst du es reparieren?

Viele Grüße und fröhliches Mappen
Metzor
jf_simon (2024-05-08 06:29:23+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. Ich komm wahrscheinlich leider erst Morgen dazu es zu korrigierten. Falls du Zeit hast, kannst es gern machen. Gruß Simon
jf_simon (2024-05-08 08:22:11+00:00): habs doch schon geschafft :) ist gefixt
Metzor (2024-05-08 09:12:22+00:00): Danke :)
descubrebitcoin (2024-05-07 15:25:01+00:00): I have reverted your edit. Please don't spam. Also, OpenStreetMap is intended only for businesses that have physical locations.
Vivek Dumre (2024-05-23 14:58:21+00:00): Good mapping with a good changeset comment. Keep mapping.#OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151015488
axtesting (2024-05-08 06:45:20+00:00): Not factual information. Pls Delete.
Sushant852 (2024-05-08 07:18:43+00:00): https://www.thehindu.com/news/international/rs-100-nepal-currency-note-to-have-new-map-that-includes-lipulekh-limpiyadhura-and-kalapani/article68139191.ece
Sushant852 (2024-05-08 07:21:36+00:00): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalapani_territory#:~:text=The%20Kalapani%20territory%20is%20an,claimed%20by%20Nepal%20since%201997.
Sushant852 (2024-05-08 07:22:41+00:00): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalapani_territory
MxxCon (2024-05-09 04:51:03+00:00): Hello.

Please note that in OSM you are required to submit only real and valid information. Creating fake information is against the terms of service to which you agreed when you signed up. If you will continue to intentionally vandalise the map your account will be referred to Data Working Group, which can result in temporary or permanent account ban. Additionally, your vandalism can be forwarded to Niantic for potential punitive actions in Pokemon Go.

You are most welcome to continue to contribute only real and valid data in OSM.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151082674
felipeeugenio (2024-05-07 22:06:50+00:00): Revierto ediciones vandálicas de usuario multicuenta.
ig4map (2024-05-13 17:11:49+00:00): Is it real library on bare rocks?

According to OSM wiki for amenity=library: For OpenStreetMap only physical libraries as library buildings and/or as organizations are relevant.
fortera_au (2024-05-08 04:06:36+00:00): Hi, there is a turning circle there, removing valid info just to fix a QA "error" shouldn't happen.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151016900
ratrun (2024-05-08 14:14:21+00:00): It looks as if you only checked osmcha and sow that nodes were deleted. But the turning circle was duplicated before and I only merged the two of them. So I really didn't remove anything.
fortera_au (2024-05-08 22:51:45+00:00): Ahh, thanks for explaining, yeah looked like you'd just removed the tag but I missed it marking it as not visible, sorry!
CurlingMan13 (2024-05-07 23:26:00+00:00): Access tags should be used instead where private ownership exists.  this driveway is visible in aerial imagery.  You can read why deletion is not the answer here:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

Changeset reverted in part or full.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151031986
sofdjs (2024-05-09 15:31:26+00:00): Hi, this is not a driveway and is not visible in aerial imagery. It is incorrect data.
CurlingMan13 (2024-05-07 23:22:50+00:00): Access tags should be used instead of deletion.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151017042
sofdjs (2024-05-09 15:33:12+00:00): This is not a driveway and this is not visible from aerial imagery.
Syl (2024-05-08 13:16:14+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai enlevé le tag principal si ce n'est plus un lieu de culte.
kikihadwiyanti (2024-05-24 05:03:48+00:00): Great work on your mapping. Before uploading all data make sure the building has been squared could be better. Keep up the mapping, cheers! #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151017524
tekim (2024-05-08 14:22:04+00:00): reverting fake edit

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151059140
vasony (2025-07-06 07:56:11+00:00): sokat nem ért, össze lett vonva
infeeeee (2025-07-06 17:50:05+00:00): Lássuk mi lesz, ha észreveszi ezt, mikor legközelebb ide megy vásárolni. Szerintem is jobb összevonva, de nem fogok edit war-ba bonyolódni senkivel, inkább ráhagyom.
infeeeee (2025-07-10 09:37:21+00:00): Bárcsak összevonva lett volna, de nem, csak simán törölve lett mert valaki azt hitte duplikátum, ezzel elveszett minden adat: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168128847 Szóval ez a külön jelölés nem csak rossz, hanem még a hibát is generál, egyáltalán nem kezdőbarát. Megcsináltam, most a poligonon minden, remélem így marad, de talán ezután majd belátja, hogy minden szempontból ez a jobb jelölés, javítva: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168733377
bkil (2025-07-19 13:46:57+00:00): Azt hittem már egyszer megegyeztünk, hogy mindenhol úgy kell jelölni ahol a környezetében is van. XI. kerületben mindenhol pontként van a POI? Pontosan mi a bajod?
bkil (2025-07-19 13:51:16+00:00): Sőt, még az is felmerült alternatívaként, hogyha úgyis mindegy, akkor maradjon úgy ahogy felvették, és ez már az elejétől pontos mikromapping volt.
bkil (2025-07-19 13:59:27+00:00): Random példák külföldről 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10589824633#map=19/48.224203/16.470012
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6399481458#map=19/48.218796/16.409085
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/936125051#map=19/48.192471/16.399377
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1543303963#map=19/48.175675/16.374662
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/916107815#map=19/48.181111/16.375180
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7442793685#map=19/48.233770/16.365660
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/742650527#map=19/48.231218/16.375480
infeeeee (2025-07-19 14:46:49+00:00): Ezt ne nekünk ird, mi ezt tudjuk, és el is fogadtuk az érvelésed, de havonta fog jönni egy  akár magyarul nem beszélő kezdő, és le fogja törölni, mint láttuk. Aztán hónapokig ugy marad, rosszabb állapotban mint ha az épületen lenne címkezve. Amugy meg ne külföldi példákat nézz, hanem hogy a legtöbb (ha nem az összes) külön épületben levő aldi/lidl az épületen van cimkézve Budapesten.
infeeeee (2025-07-19 14:51:05+00:00): Random ellenpéldák a kerületből: 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/326903375

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/173793809

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/261528434

Ezeknél mind hasonló a szituáció, ezeknél miért nem baj, h az épületen van a cimke.
bkil (2025-07-20 09:49:22+00:00): Nekem régóta csípi a szemem az ingatlan túlterhelése túl sok ortogonális tulajdonsággal (lásd: fizikai vs. céginformációk), főleg olyan helyeken ahol több funkció is szerepel ugyanazon épületben (lásd szomszédos Penny). Viszont csak azért nem szoktam oda-vissza konvertálgatni cicaharcban, hogy úgy legyen ahogy nekem tetszik mert annál több dolgom is van. Viszont ha valaki ezt teszi, arra érdemes rákérdezni. Ugyanakkor a linkeltek közül a nagyobbaknál (vagy lásd még Lidl Albertfalva) sokszor nem egyértelmű, hogy hol a bejárat, mert OsmAnd és osm.org is csak korlátozottan tud ránagyítani. Alternatívaként felkínáltam, hogy vegyük fel akkor területként, ami alá tartozik az épület, parkolók, töltők, szobrok, bevásárlókocsik, beléptetők, stb. de erre se nagyon kaptam választ. Ez kb. a legrosszabb kompromisszum ami egy rossz kezdeti beidegződésből ered amikor a térképen jobban látszottak a nagy területre szúrt feliratok mint a pontok.
Vivek Dumre (2024-05-12 04:35:47+00:00): Good Mapping with clear changeset comment.#OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151017786
tekim (2024-05-08 14:32:01+00:00): reverting fake edit

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151059606
tekim (2024-05-08 14:21:12+00:00): reverting fake edit

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151059067
tekim (2024-05-08 14:18:37+00:00): reverting fake edit

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151058911
eggie (2024-05-08 14:13:09+00:00): Dag Diederick,

club=....  rendert helaas (nog)  niet op de kaart.
Meestal voeg ik amenity=community_centre toe. Dat geeft ook een symbool. Tenminste als die vlag de lading dekt.
MVG
eggie
CurlingMan13 (2025-02-05 03:40:04+00:00): Changeset reverted.  These are residential roads, not living streets.  Living streets are very rare in the US.
See:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dliving_street#United_States

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162149095
muralito (2024-05-07 23:23:51+00:00): Hi. When you add private roads please set the appropriate access tag, access=private in this case.
aaronq227 (2024-05-08 21:29:09+00:00): Hi Muralito, thank you for reaching out. I will add access = private to the service ways.
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-08 05:05:38+00:00): #Pokemon ?
Leogolaz (2024-05-08 15:50:51+00:00): ?
GartenStuhl (2024-05-08 15:58:05+00:00): auch etwas weiter oben gibts ein "grasland" mit dem namen "park"
riecht schon sehr nach pokemon.
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-08 16:17:01+00:00): Siehe Version 1 des erstellen Ways: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1280630743/history/1

natural=beach
Leogolaz (2024-05-13 13:27:25+00:00): Yes, I first came here because I heard this was the map that is used for the game. So I just came to play around - that's why I added the beach thing. However, as it is an open source and I imagine it is also used for serious projects, I adjusted it as it is. I live there and I added the 2 parks on the block and I tried to add a new building that was recently constructured on the corner of Virginio-Malnati vs Chemin du Vieux-Bureau. 
I am not sure if I added the things correctly, though. But I'm keen to support and adjust it to be correct. So if you have any suggestions, please let me know how to improve it :)
Thanks
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-13 15:38:10+00:00): Thanks for your answer.

Is the name of the park correct?
"meyrin" or should it be "Meyrin?
silversurfer83 (2024-05-07 21:17:55+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OSM :)

danke, dass ihr helft, die Karte aktuell zu halten.

Ein Hinweis zu dieser Änderung: Wenn der Jugendraum nur einen (kleinen) Teil des DGH einnimmt sollte er als einzelner Punkt (node) dargestellt werden. Dies erlaubt erstens eine saubere Trennung der Eigenschaften verschiedner Objekte und zweitens unterstreicht es die Trennung des "Raumes" vom DGH.

Bei Fragen immer raus damit

silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151019280
silversurfer83 (2024-05-07 21:19:04+00:00): auch hier. Bitte als eigenen node im Gebäude :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151019580
bernardo60 (2024-11-09 04:12:50+00:00): All these alleyways ("gang" in Indonesia) are too narrow for a four-wheeled vehicle to pass and should be tagged as a path, not a street.
PechoraPlain (2024-11-13 23:46:07+00:00): Hello bernardo60. The highway features (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/584513703, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/584513702) were already assigned tags that prohibit motorcar travel. The imagery available in the area for these roads (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-8.602929259744954&lng=115.29151799405054&z=16.405585403164423&pKey=1608272986297339&focus=photo & https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-8.602334999999997&lng=115.29202199999997&z=16.405585403164423&pKey=864204171376945&focus=photo) do support the general classification of living street more than path based upon the https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Indonesian_Tagging_Guidelines#Roads page. And they more meet the criteria of living street than their previous classification of residential. Hope that explains things well. Best.
Alyssa Chance (2024-05-13 12:26:38+00:00): You created a pedestrian and bike path where nothing exists.
VLD316 (2024-05-13 18:06:36+00:00): Hello Alyssa Chance,
You are correct about one of the ways that has since been changed. When adding a way to close a multipolygon, I must have expanded off of Zunkman’s geometry which copied those incorrect tags over.
I appreciate you bringing this to my attention.
Please reach out if you have any more concerns.
stillhart (2024-12-07 18:47:00+00:00): 🤩
map per (2024-05-09 07:43:05+00:00): Hallo LittleJoeMuc,

kennst du die neuen hochauflösenden und lagegetreuen Luftbilder von München schon? Damit ist Micromapping viel einfacher.

vgl. Luftbilder der Landeshauptstadt München 20 cm: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/M%C3%BCnchen#Datenquellen

Viele Grüße
map per
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-11 10:31:02+00:00): Thank you for mapping. The mapping looks great and also the changeset comment. Happy Mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151020198
tekim (2024-05-08 14:38:29+00:00): reverting fake edit

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151059919
CJ_W (2024-05-07 17:09:53+00:00): I accidently removed Manatee Island from River Area relation, and now it has disappeared from the live map. I'm not sure how to make it show up as an island again. Sorry!
eggie (2024-05-07 17:28:26+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback  Bedankt voor je bijdrage.
Niet name=Perslucht gebruiken.
Dat is hetzelfde als name=huis name=bankje.
De amenity= is voldoende.


MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-05-07 17:31:46+00:00): Poi verplaatst.. name=  verwijderd
Thomas Driessen (2024-05-07 17:53:58+00:00): Dank voor feedback! Inderdaad iets te kort door de bocht.
eggie (2024-05-07 17:56:58+00:00): No problem. De poi staat nu op de juiste locatie. In ieder geval nuttige info.
Mapse..
eggie
mueschel (2024-05-09 09:17:47+00:00): Hi,
you added the tag "recycling:Gravats" here. This is not uses in other places. Could you clarify what can be recycled here?
Vivek Dumre (2024-05-12 04:34:26+00:00): Good mapping with clear changeset comment.#OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151020830
Vivek Dumre (2024-05-12 04:31:34+00:00): Good mapping with clear changeset comment.Thank you for mapping.#OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151021198
felipeeugenio (2024-05-07 22:14:37+00:00): Hola
Tan solo para entender. Esos son los nombres de verdad de los caminos? o es una descripción de a dónde llevan?
Para revisar bien los tags que está usando.

saludos
Miguel Ángel Saavedra (2024-05-07 23:37:47+00:00): No tienen nombre, pero es una descripción de hacia donde se dirigen. También agregué un portón (recorro por ahí a diario).
Glassman (2024-05-08 19:41:19+00:00): The original polygon was a landuse. by changing it to a building, it should match the roof line. I made the adjustment.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151021865
akimapbuilder (2024-05-08 06:03:59+00:00): When adding building, try to follow building footprints and match the geometry. Cheers!
felipeeugenio (2024-05-07 22:11:55+00:00): Hola. Esto se publica en internet.
welzheimerwald (2024-05-13 21:00:29+00:00): Warum wurde für den bereits eingetragenen Boxer-Club Göppingen (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1081121166) ein Duplikat erzeugt (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11887219396) und dieser Changeset mit einem nichtssagenden „.” versehen?
Fipspilot (2024-05-13 21:12:39+00:00): Ich sehe kein Duplikat. Es wurde ein "Restaurant-Punkt" hinzugefügt, da dieser gefehlt hat.
Im Changeset steht ein ".", weil man das Feld nicht leer lassen kann und diese Änderung nicht wirklich eine große Erklärung benötigt.
welzheimerwald (2024-05-14 21:20:05+00:00): Das Gebäude-Objekt (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1081121166) besitzt bereits alle restaurantspezifischen Tags. Ein zusätzliches Node-Objekt mit diesen Tags führt zu unnötiger Datenredundanz und ist streng genommen ein Duplikat.

In vielen Fällen (etwa bei größeren Gebäuden mit mehreren Einrichtungen) empfiehlt es sich, die "amenity=restaurant"-Eigenschaften in einem eigenen Node zu taggen - Dann aber bitte die entsprechenden Tags aus dem Way-Objekt entfernen!
HirschKauz (2024-05-07 18:51:34+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM! 
Please consider leaving a descriptive changeset comment. It makes things easier to following mappers whean they can instantly see what you have changed in your edit. 
Happy mapping and have fun
Hbnr (2024-05-07 20:42:56+00:00): Sure, sorry, will do next time :) 
Thanks!
JesseFTW (2024-12-18 21:35:30+00:00): I see that you put operator=SMUD on all these (excellently added) power lines. The Name Suggestion Index (NSI) recommends expanding then name (and putting the abbreviation in operator:short). Before I go ahead and change them all over (which I'm glad to do), I thought I'd give you a heads up in case you object, or have any suggestions or questions.

I changed some of the ones out of town already, in this changeset, as an example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160369569
esuor (2024-12-19 01:28:39+00:00): Thanks for bringing that to my attention.  I have absolutely no issue with you making the updates!
JesseFTW (2024-12-19 20:29:09+00:00): Updated all the nodes: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160409075

Updated 3 distant dams: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160409134

Updated 1,000 power lines: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160409201

Updated the other 400 power lines: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160409338

Updated the one relation (the decommissioned nuclear plant): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160409651

That's all of it! Thanks again for your work adding them originally.
joost schouppe (2025-02-24 12:48:04+00:00): Als je paden verwijdert die nog zichtbaar zijn op luchtfoto's, officiële kaarten en/of strava, dan kan je ze best aanduiden met disused:highway=(het type dat ze waren) in plaats van ze gewoon te wissen. Nu loop je het risico dat een mapper ze terug toevoegt op basis van dat soort informatie.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-05-07 18:40:33+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Długa":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3524575820
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3524575821
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11887325490

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Dawid2849 (2024-05-07 18:41:36+00:00): To nie jest błąd - po prostu gmina nadała adresy od ulicy, która jest daleko od tych adresów
aceman444 (2024-11-10 23:26:17+00:00): Hi, how did you find out the street name? Are they any street signs showing it? The official kadastre map does not have a name for this street.
Peter_toth (2024-11-16 21:58:57+00:00): Hi, I was walking in the area and observing the signs on the houses
eggie (2024-05-07 18:57:20+00:00): Dag scxi

Je hebt de weg opgeknipt in twee delen, maar met welk doel?

MVG,
eggie
eggie (2024-05-07 19:02:53+00:00): De weg heb ik weer samengevoegd. Het blok weghalen was natuurlijk prima.
MVG
eggie
scxi (2024-05-08 13:45:49+00:00): Dank voor de correctie @eggie.
Frans S (2024-05-17 14:46:53+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Why did you alter a correct tagged highway=residential into addr:street=residential ? Last tag is incorrect.
I corrected it.
Best regards
silversurfer83 (2024-05-07 21:29:10+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OSM :)

danke, dass du hilfst die Karte aktuell zu halten.

Du hast darum gebeten, dass sich jemand diese Änderung ansieht. Ich mach das mal.

Du hast hier eine Fläche in die Datenbank eingepflegt und vergessen dieser auch Eigenschaften (tags) zu geben. Vielleicht ist es sinnvoll die JFW als eigenen Punkt innerhalb des Gebäudes zu erfassen, da so die Trennung von Gebäude und Nutzung besser funktioniert.

Wäre gut, wenn du das Gebäude noch anpassen könntest ;)

cheers
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151024726
akimapbuilder (2024-05-08 06:14:45+00:00): You draw building over backyard, try to avoid that. Thanks
jb54osm (2024-05-08 11:06:26+00:00): Dag Joosteto,

Als het restaurant niet meer terugkomt, is een downgrade hier op zijn plaats. Die heb ik uitgevoerd.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-08 07:43:56+00:00): Thanks for a fix!
joost schouppe (2024-05-17 14:14:10+00:00): I've removed all the healthcare=hospital from the buildings here, as the whole site is already a hospital. I did add the building type hospital to the buildings here. Since you seem to know the site, might be useful to add the emergency_ward_entrance
d3mol3k (2024-05-08 15:35:37+00:00): co to za kolejna droga której nie ma - tam dochodzi jeden pas usuń ten prawoskręt  z Księdza piotra Wawrzyniaka w Aleję Wojska Polskiego
damdab77 (2024-05-09 13:22:11+00:00): Cześć d3mol3k, z Wawrzyniaka możliwy jest skręt w prawo, jak i w lewo. Bazując na sugestii na skrzynce zaproponowałem inne rozwiązanie https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151099927
jb54osm (2024-05-08 10:54:23+00:00): Dag Joosteto,

Je hebt hier het hele adres verwijderd (286A), maar dat bestaat nog. In iD volstaat het om de optie Downgrade op de node te kiezen. Het restaurant verdwijnt dan, maar het adres blijft bestaan. Ik draai de wijziging even terug, en doe dan dan de downgrade.
d3mol3k (2024-05-08 15:32:58+00:00): Możesz przywrócić przebieg DW119 w okolicy stacji paliw AMIC? nie ma tam fizycznego rozdziału dróg !!! nie mapujemy odzielnych pasów dróg. Zrobiłeś niezły bałagan na mapie
rskedgell (2024-07-23 14:57:12+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Although adding oneway=no to a road is harmless, it doesn't actually change anything as that is the default for roads. There are cases where it can be helpful, as explained in the OSM wiki.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:oneway

If you are experiencing problems with routing software, this may not solve them unless the router is badly broken. If it does, there is always the chance that another mapper will remove the oneway=no tag as unnecessary in the future. If you need help, it may be worth asking in the OSM Community Forum.
https://community.openstreetmap.org/
bxl-forever (2024-05-08 00:05:34+00:00): Hello,

Thanks for adding such parking spaces.
You may be interested to know that we have tagging standards in OSM, i.e. we try to use the same standards for the same objects to make it easier to build queries.  I had to redo your latest edits but I see you keep adding ones with the wrong tags, so maybe you might want to have a look.
Have a nice day.