piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Muhmaker (2024-01-10 12:11:22+00:00): Message again in english: 
Hi, I happened to notice when I was repairing bus routes around here that you made a tiny change to the name of the operator. On their website, however, it is only called mbH. As I understand it, the G is already part of the full part of the name. That sounds a bit like nitpicking, but the background to the matter is that the changed spelling of the operator means that the bus routes can no longer be found so easily in the PTNA route monitoring system. We should agree on a standardised spelling.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-09 19:40:26+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1017204570

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
redd (2024-01-09 21:07:54+00:00): Super, danke fürs erfassen!
CurlingMan13 (2024-01-10 02:05:56+00:00): Do not partially overlap landcovers.  The fairway and green should not overlap.  I have gone through and fixed this error.  

Please review the following to avoid other common mistakes.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#:~:text=the%20building%20itself.-,Common%20mapping%20pitfalls,-Adding%20name%3D*
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146078455
George McMann (2024-01-10 11:31:08+00:00): OK, thanks!
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-09 19:40:25+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10293991358
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11503925611
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1017204565

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
woodpeck_repair (2024-02-28 00:02:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 147993534, 147993538, 147993527, 147993537, 147993522, 147993535, 147993517, 147993518, 147993530 where the changeset comment is: revert edits of user Barroszt in 2024 that affect Torun, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146515808
Sajeevini sivajothy (2024-05-27 06:28:24+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work, and it looks good.#OMGuru#OSMCha

But But Please Use a proper Changest Comment for your Edits.For Example, If you Digitized Roads, 
'Added Roads, Place Name, District Name, Country Name and Use Suitable Hashtag"
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146078825
OttoR (2024-05-27 10:46:45+00:00): @Sajeevini; yes, good changeset comments are needed. And if you looked at my profile (bot on OSM and HOT) you'd learned, I am all for it.

In this case the only thing I did was orthogonalised 1 building; probably as part of a demo for a HOT Mapathon or some other form of QA sweep. 

Not sure if reviewing a changeset for comments with 1 (pretty obvious and very minor change) is the best impact you can make; expecially in this area of the world.
woodpeck_repair (2024-02-28 00:02:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 147993534, 147993538, 147993527, 147993537, 147993522, 147993535, 147993517, 147993518, 147993530 where the changeset comment is: revert edits of user Barroszt in 2024 that affect Torun, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146515808
woodpeck_repair (2024-02-28 00:02:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 147993534, 147993538, 147993527, 147993537, 147993522, 147993535, 147993517, 147993518, 147993530 where the changeset comment is: revert edits of user Barroszt in 2024 that affect Torun, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146515808
eggie (2024-01-11 10:26:04+00:00): Hoi Martin... Staat dat zuidelijke deel van die apartementen niet meer in de BAG. Je had het gebouw verwijderd. Kerkbuurt nr 208*
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=146079103
Voorlopig even teruggezet. 

MVG
eggie
Martin Borsje (2024-01-11 17:30:36+00:00): Ok het is dus nu goed zo? Ik weet niet precies wat er fout gegaan is; ik heb in ieder geval niets (meer) gewijzigd.
Gr.
Martin
eggie (2024-01-11 17:58:08+00:00): 👍
CurlingMan13 (2024-01-10 02:07:13+00:00): When mapping buildings, "Q" can/should be used to square the buildings.
BCNorwich (2024-01-11 09:29:22+00:00): Duplicated highway removed.
eggie (2024-01-09 20:51:40+00:00): Dag Anna...   leisure=park is een  transparant die de functie aanduidt.

Een leisure=park ligt dan als een deken over alle vlakken heen. Dan is het beter om de stukken landuse (dus wat je ziet)  als landuse=grass , scrub, forest? te taggen.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-01-09 20:57:33+00:00): Ik heb de landuse even in gevuld met natural=grassland  De tag leisure=park ligt over alles heen. Een naam heb ik niet toegevoegd.
MVG
eggie
citrula (2024-01-10 01:20:19+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Thanks for your contribution. Esri World imagery layer already has these houses if you would like to redraw them :) Different imagery layers are updated at different times so it's always a good idea to check through them when you think something might be missing.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146079986
NiedernhausenerJunge (2024-01-09 20:52:51+00:00): Benutzte Quellen:
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karlsruher_Lokalbahn

https://ka.stadtwiki.net/Lokalbahn

https://upload.wikimedia.org
/wikipedia/commons/1/1b/Stadtplan_1906.jpg
http://gk.historic.place/historische_objekte/l/de/index.html?zoom=15&lat=49.00308&lon=8.40461&pid=KvGoHaHbHcSaHe

https://web.archive.org/web/20160315015316/http://www.schygulla.de/verkehrsrelikte/bahn/suedw/karlsruhe.htm

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:Karlsruher_lokalbahn.png

https://www.landkartenshop.de/product_info.php?products_id=36121
Scout Jens (2024-01-12 06:39:07+00:00): Da haben wir ja gleiche Interessen, was die KLB angeht. Der Abzweig Richtung Hafen (1913 bis 1983) verlief nach meinen Infos in der Lindenallee. Wie sicher bist Du Dir hier, bzw. welche Quelle hast Du dafür genau?
Der Rest passt ganz gut.
Viele Grüße, Jens
Scout Jens (2024-01-12 06:56:48+00:00): Abzweig Rheinhafen: Von 1913 bis 1933 (sorry). Von B36 Ausfahrt Grünwinkel über Lindenallee dann über den heutigen Sportplatz zum Hammweg bis zur heutigen Schleife Waidweg
NiedernhausenerJunge (2024-01-12 15:47:40+00:00): Also der Abzweig nach Daxlanden (1889-1938) ist sowohl auf der Wikipedia Karte https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8b/Karlsruher_lokalbahn.png
als auch in der historischen Karte von 1893 in der heutigen Rheinhafenstraße eingezeichnet mit Endpunkt am Kirchplatz in Daxlanden http://gk.historic.place/historische_objekte/l/de/index.html?zoom=15&lat=49.00308&lon=8.40461&pid=KvGoHaHbHcSaHe
Scout Jens (2024-01-12 16:52:48+00:00): OK, das stimmt wohl so. dann muss ich mal schauen, was das ist im Altlas zum 300 jährigen Geburtstag von Karlsruhe. Eventuell gab es noch eine weitere Strecke? Am Sonntag bin ich erstmal vor Ort unterwegs bis Durmersheim und schaue nach Hinweisen. Aber nach dem Abzweig. Vielleicht finde ich noch weitere historische Karten. Spannendes Thema auf jeden Fall.
Viele Grüße, Jens
MrKrisKrisu (2024-02-06 18:11:33+00:00): Hi, was ist der Sinn dahinter, historische Daten in OpenStreetMap zu speichern?

Meiner Meinung nach gehören keine historischen Daten hier her, sondern nur die Gegenwart.
NiedernhausenerJunge (2024-02-06 18:19:14+00:00): Der Verlauf der alten Strecke ist heute durch Straßenzüge etc noch klar erkennbar. Sie helfen heute dabei zu verstehen, wie die heutige Situation zustande gekommen ist. Wenn keine historischen Daten auf OSM erlaubt wären, würde es Tags wie abandoned oder razed nicht geben.
Scout Jens (2024-02-08 05:49:45+00:00): OSM ist eine Datenbank, keine Karte. Das ist ganz wichtig zu wissen. 
Die häufigste Verwendung ist die Abbildung der heutigen Situation als Karte, die dann z.B. für die Navigation verwendet werden. Aufgegebene oder sogar abgebaute Eisenbahnstrecken werden in diesen Karten nicht angezeigt. Sie tun also keinem "weh"/ stören nicht.

Es gibt aber auch OpenRailwayMap, welche speziell für Schienenwege konzipiert ist. Dort werden auch ehemalige Schienenverläufe angezeigt, was nicht nur bei mir auf großes Interesse stößt. Des weiteren kann man sich auch speziell historische Gebäude anzeigen lassen, wenn diese mit den entsprechenden Daten hinterlegt sind. Auch das finde ich klasse.
Wichtig zu wissen ist: Alle diese Karten und Anwendungen greifen auf die gleiche Datenbank OpenStreetMap (OSM) zurück! Zusätzlich sehe ich es auch so, wie NiederhausenerJunge: Die heutige Situation erklärt sich oft aus der Historie. 

Ich hoffe, Du kannst nun besser damit leben MrKrisKrisu. 
Viele Grüße!
woodpeck (2024-01-09 21:25:12+00:00): Deletion reverted - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15565
Luzandro (2024-01-12 11:44:26+00:00): Hallo,

der Zugang für Radfahrer über die Esslinger Furt ist nach dieser Karte weiterhin erlaubt: https://www.donauauen.at/assets/diverse_pdfs/managementplan/Nationalpark-Donau-Auen-Karte-Radwege.pdf
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146080892
dg27 (2024-01-17 09:51:56+00:00): Vielen Dank für die Info. Meine Daten waren hier anscheinend nicht vollständig bzw. schwer zu erkennen. Hab es nun an die von dir geteilten NP Karte angeglichen.
Luzandro (2024-05-17 06:00:14+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4240045
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-09 21:20:17+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1071223746

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
woodpeck_repair (2024-01-09 21:21:01+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 145807385, 145859514, 145859849, 146079995, 146080074, 146080801.
BCNorwich (2024-01-11 08:56:27+00:00): Hi, You've actually made duplicate highways by mapping the raceway on top of existing highways which disrupts routing. I've removed the duplicated highways and created a route relation for the raceway. 

Regards Bernard.
KevinOs (2024-01-10 02:53:32+00:00): Hello again EVPac, GregHeffley275, etc.. i see you have a new account.  Please keep your edits to a smaller area if you don't want anyone to flag you for another ban. Happy New year
Warin61 (2024-01-14 03:40:44+00:00): Hi,
I have separated the individual courts. 
I have also added buildings, and then placed the club on one of the buildings together with club=sport, sport=netball. 
I think that is a little better..
Famlam (2024-01-10 20:40:45+00:00): Let op dat "Fietskluis" geen naam van de fietsenstalling is. Het is een type.
Zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bicycle_parking voor de opties. Hier lijkt het mij "lockers"
Famlam (2024-01-10 20:41:11+00:00): Oh, die tag staat er al op. Dan hoeft alleen de naam eraf
Zandkuil (2024-01-10 21:38:20+00:00): Bedankt, gecorrigeerd in wijziging 146120091. Ik kwam op het idee om hem ter verduidelijking zo te noemen omdat ik dat ook zag bij node 6378367624, maar dan moet het daar wellicht ook gewijzigd worden?
Famlam (2024-01-10 22:29:17+00:00): Zeer waarschijnlijk wel (en ook bij station Diemen Zuid). Tenzij er daar letterlijk een bordje staat dat het een fietskluis genaamd Fietskluis is, maar dat betwijfel ik.

Namen zijn overigens soms heel lastig... (en zelfs als er een naam is: er zijn veel regels in OSM over hoe je namen goed weergeeft).
Xvtn (2024-01-10 16:05:40+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OSM! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes. Everything looks good to me, thanks for your contributions!
aTarom (2024-01-10 08:45:41+00:00): Hola Uanraf, és possible que sigui l'aplicació Go Mapp afegeix "," en comptes de "." al les elevacions com a separador decimal?
Els passo a "."
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146094529
Salutacions
Uanraf (2024-01-16 18:23:27+00:00): Merci per les correccions. Ho vaig fer  jo malament, Go Mapp no m'avisa d'aquest error. 
Salutacions
Adela Švončinárová (2024-01-10 00:30:39+00:00): mozem mat na teba prozbicku? ked budes nieco riesit v mojom meste napisal by si sem do komentarov, co presne sa zmenilo dodalo, vyeditovalo atd? dakujem.
aceman444 (2024-01-10 07:22:29+00:00): Je to tam napisane. Ale mozem to dat aj po slovensky.
Tu som pridal travniky okolo Kauflandu a Vendo parku.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-31 15:18:16+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11504470835/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop?
skquinn (2025-03-31 22:45:30+00:00): Updated to shop=trailer in changeset 164351510
Harvesterify (2024-01-16 13:47:42+00:00): Good afternoon,
You have not modified the correct way/point, I reverted your commit.
woodpeck (2024-01-09 23:33:32+00:00): Hello there mgrubbsjr, in this changeset you have deleted a whole number of objects, only to re-create them again with a slight offset. Don't do that - it loses the history of objects. For example, it now looks as if you were the original author of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1238440645 when in truth that very same object had been created over five years ago by another user https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/676698134. Additionally, that other user had explicitly recorded this to be a sandy area - information that is now lost after your edit. Same with https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/676698137 which was explicitly marked as being grass, and which you replaced with the near-identical https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1238440642, now without that additional information. The ID editor has support for moving features if they are misaligned, or if ID's capabilities are insufficient for what you want to do, check out the JOSM editor. Keep in mind, however, that aerial imagery can easily be off by 5 meters - if you cycle through different backgrounds in ID you will see how each imagery is slightly different. Do not blindly trust one imagery over the other without having calibrated it with the help of precise GPS tracks.
mgrubbsjr (2024-01-10 00:34:48+00:00): Hello,
What was there is not accurate. I am only trying to make it more accurate to map out a golf course I have knowledge of to transfer to a be able to play on a simulator. I dont think it much matters who is the original author if what is there can be improved upon and made more true to life. If a recorded sandy area is not actually a sand area or if a wooded area is described as rough why should it be left like that if it's not accurate?
mgrubbsjr (2024-01-10 01:03:28+00:00): Also if the offsets were consistent throughout then I could understand, but they aren't, some areas have an offset and others don't. If the whole course is consistent then regardless of the imagery being off it will be accurate as a whole when translated to simulator.
sbre (2024-01-28 19:17:04+00:00): Maybe don't remove ele=* when removing a natural=peak?
Xvtn (2024-01-28 20:06:24+00:00): That's a good point, I suppose even if something shouldn't be classified as a peak it doesn't really hurt to have the elev data still. I'll do that in the future!

On a related note, I often wonder how much "topo" type data belongs in OSM. I've seen some mappers go absolutely crazy adding cliffs everywhere, which (at least on Carto) basically just become visual noise. So I definitely think the line needs to be drawn somewhere.
That being said, again I do agree with you that peaks and surveyed hills are fine and good to have an ele tag.
sbre (2024-01-28 20:14:21+00:00): There has been some discussion lately on the community forum about natural=cliff, but alas without any satisfying conclusion.
Xvtn (2024-01-28 20:16:20+00:00): Good to know. I'll check it out.
SomeoneElse (2024-01-10 01:26:40+00:00): Hello Alex,
Andy from OSM's Data Working Group here.  We've received a couple of messages from people also mapping in Ukraine saying that it'd be great if you were to use actual changeset comments not just "-" every time.  Please do try and say something  - it will help other mappers.
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2024-01-10 01:27:17+00:00): Привіт Алекс,
Енді з робочої групи даних OSM тут. Ми отримали декілька повідомлень від людей, які також займаються картографуванням в Україні, у яких говориться, що було б чудово, якби ви щоразу використовували фактичні коментарі до набору змін, а не просто «-». Будь ласка, спробуйте сказати щось - це допоможе іншим картографам.
З найкращими побажаннями,
Енді
Alex Khimich (2024-01-10 08:49:18+00:00): Does it mean that you will block me as well for 10 years if I fail to comply? It is impossible to describe every edit as they are all almost same ant it it time consuming.
SomeoneElse (2024-01-10 11:04:48+00:00): It really isn't impossible to say _something_ .  IF it helps, have a look at mine: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/SomeoneElse/history and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/SomeoneElse2/history - many of the changes there are "the same sort of thing" as previous ones, but it's still possible to add a bit of information.
Alex Khimich (2024-01-10 19:06:33+00:00): I'm glad that you have your country fully pictured and the only problem is to fix some rare road signs changes meanwhile. Now may I ask you to cite what exactly did I do wrong that shall not be done by RULES but not in opinions by "some" users? This is not a call from community as we don't have community, (well.. there is a chat in ruZZian telegram run by some anonymous weirdos that even don't allow to post images, but this is not community). I will not comment every time that I added grassland, mud, allotments or farmland as this is obvious for even for idiots. I'm not interested in any complicated navigational edits, so no comments needed followingly. I'm not interested in any further discussions with you since you use OSM for maccupation of Crimea. Now go and show of yourself how you can block uses, good job.
SomeoneElse (2024-01-10 19:12:20+00:00): Rather than Telegram, I'd suggest https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/ua/66 .
MxxCon (2024-01-11 04:51:04+00:00): Hello.
You give the same wikidata id, but different name:etymology tags? That doesn't seem correct..
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146084281
IsStatenIsland (2024-01-14 00:55:59+00:00): There are no Wikidata items for the various components of the Morris Canal. The few streets or other objects named after locks or planes have a more specific name:etymology but the same name:etymology:wikidata as you have noticed.

Consider the following:
"There is not always a 1-to-1 mapping between OSM and Wikidata. A Wikidata item may refer to several different OSM database objects, for example: a (boundary=administrative) municipality, place=neighborhood, place=city, and place=island might have the same name but be mapped differently in OSM. In this case consider splitting the Wikidata item (or ask for help if you are not sure how to do this).

Some Wikidata items represent features that are mapped as a series of several objects in OSM (e.g. long streets, streams). In such cases, the Wikidata item can be linked to from an appropriate OSM relation."

From what I understand, the tagging scheme I chose is not incorrect but could be improved with a hierarchy of new wikidata items for the several canal components.
MxxCon (2024-01-14 01:17:33+00:00): That's not the point. The purpose of the "name:etymology=" tag is to record for whom/what a given feature is named.

As documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name:etymology, "In general, this key is used when the source of the name for a street (or other element) is not obvious, or when multiple possibilities require disambiguation.

You have "name=Plane View"+"name:etymology=Morris Canal Plane 2W". This doesn't make sense.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146084281
aixbrick (2024-01-10 08:57:34+00:00): Hallo,
du hast hier bei Kreisverkehren (wieder mal) ref auf unsigned_ref geändert. Könntest du bitte den Grund erläutern?
Ein Kreisverkehr ist Teil der Bundes-, Landes- oder Kreisstraße. Und wenn mehrere Straßen aufeinandertreffen, ist der Kreisverkehr trotzdem Teil einer dieser Straßen.
Gruß
wermak (2024-01-10 12:14:48+00:00): Ein Kreisverkehr ist nur ein aufgeweiteter Punkt einer Kreuzung. Eine Kreuzung alleine hat kein ref oder name. Der Kreisverkehr ist eben nicht Bestandteil einer
der abgehenden Straßen sondern die Kreuzung der Straßen. Schaue z.B. bei OSM mal nach Frankreich, dem Mutterland des Kreisverkehrs. Hier trägt kein Kreisverkehr ein ref.

Schöne Grüße
aixbrick (2024-01-10 13:19:45+00:00): Das widerspricht der Festlegung im Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Droundabout#The_roundabout_itself -> Tags -> Reference tags. Und dass in Frankreich kein Kreisverkehr ein "ref" trägt, kann ich auch nicht bestätigen. Zumal sich die Aussage zu "ref" aus dem englischen Wiki auch so im französischen wiederfindet: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:junction%3Droundabout#Ref.
aixbrick (2024-01-12 09:01:09+00:00): Ich habe zu der Frage https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/kreisverkehre-mit-oder-ohne-ref/90852 wiederbelebt.
Ich124 (2024-01-10 16:13:41+00:00): Good evening aleixschwt35,
Thank you very much for creating bus route 703 - excellent work. However, please try to keep the correct order of the other bus relations when splitting a roundabout. This led to a lot of broken bus relations, so maybe remember that next time.
Hufkratzer (2024-01-10 22:17:07+00:00): Hi,
Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1238452688 really a horse riding cemter? This would be an exiremely small riding center! A riding center is some thing like
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/895398959,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/918929394
or
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/304041050
(to take some from your area). See also
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aleisure%3Dhorse_riding
HeyRayReh (2024-01-11 03:37:16+00:00): That little spot is an area designed for folks to mount/dismount their horses while riding on the Griffith Park bridle trails - it's got equipment for tying up horses and a few sets of small stairs and other things like that.  I did a quick search at the time and couldn't find a better tag...but, well, after typing that up I just tried a little harder and found trail_riding_station!  I'll change it.
Hufkratzer (2024-01-11 11:02:20+00:00): Thanks. In this case maybe "riding cemter" wasn't wrong. Is it https://www.yelp.com/biz/griffith-park-horse-rentals-glendale ? Maybe you can add some additional tags like name=*, description=*, website=* and/or operator=* so that one can get an idea what it is without visiting it.
HeyRayReh (2024-01-11 16:12:40+00:00): No, there is no operator that I know of outside of maybe the Park Rangers themselves - it's just an unattended place to mount and dismount horses. I think this new tag I found (and have already applied) thanks to you is exactly what I was looking for: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dtrail_riding_station
yawfle (2024-01-10 03:50:47+00:00): It looks like "ford=yes" is the right tag for those crossings, with an estimated "depth" tag, if possible. It's just one of those cases where the intended purpose of the tag may well be broader (or sometimes narrower) than what the word itself suggests to you. Happens with me all the time.

Another tag that might be useful in some areas of the park:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:flood_prone
yawfle (2024-01-10 05:14:52+00:00): BTW, if you ever want to get a better idea of how a tag is currently being used in a given region, you can use an Overpass Turbo query:

 http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1FMS

After the page loads, click the green "Run" button in the upper left corner, and the map should populate with circles where "ford=yes" is used.