piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
silversurfer83 (2025-04-07 19:10:04+00:00): Hello HynaG,

I see you've been active with OSM for some time yet nobody ever said hello. Well, here it is: Hello :)

There are some things that need mentioning, I guess:

- both objects you added here were already (kind of) mapped. The Pousado was already tagged as the name of the central building and where you put the parking spot was a parking spot already there. So I moved your hotel to the building and I deleted your parking.

- Names. Please do not use the "name" as a description. OsmAnd offers a "name" for nearly everything you can add but please only set the real name. "Parking" is probably not the name of the parking spot, is it? When I checked some of your edit history I found more descriptive names so here's what the wiki has to say on names:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names

Please make sure to not double add POI when using OsmAnd. Always have the latest update ready when traveling. Your version might offer live updates.

Also, when in doubt, please ask. There's always people online to help. See c.osm.org or https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contact_channels#Chats.2Fmessengers

safe travels and happy mapping
NeisReview (2025-04-07 05:45:04+00:00): #NodeDragging

Hello, and welcome to OSM.

Thank you for contributing to the map. I’ve reviewed your recent edits and noticed that at least one node of a way was moved. This can sometimes happen unintentionally, and it’s led to some unusual intersections or overlaps between street segments and other map elements.

Could you kindly confirm whether these changes were intentional or if they may have been made by mistake?

Thank you, and I look forward to your response!
---
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8524832332
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/184914576
RedAuburn (2025-04-06 22:29:01+00:00): forgor source: a blurry video i took + ref with streetside, and shop websites for their info
literan (2025-04-07 20:05:08+00:00): зачем вы в этой правке удалили проектируемую дорогу highway=proposed? это вандализм.

верну
kashcheeva (2025-04-07 22:15:52+00:00): Доброе утро. Я удалила её потому что она была добавлена 6 лет назад и до сих пор не построена. если у вас точные сведения что эта дорога станет актуальной то конечно возвращайте
literan (2025-04-08 19:57:52+00:00): это проектируемая дорога, а не строящаяся. У нас дороги строятся по 10 лет некоторые (обход Спасска на М5, обход Орехово-Зуево), а вы удалили проектируемую...

эта развязка будет обязательно построена, без нее невозможен запуск ВСМ
kashcheeva (2025-04-09 00:07:01+00:00): Хорошо, я поняла. Впредь буду аккуратней
Taya_S (2025-04-07 10:17:34+00:00): Reverted impossible city sized building

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164626621
Taya_S (2025-04-07 10:19:01+00:00): Hello  palatho123,

Please keep in mind that your edits are visible for anyone using OpenStreetMap. All edits should conform with reality.

Best regards,
Taya Snijder, on behalf of the OSMF Data Working Group
ralley (2025-04-07 01:06:31+00:00): From the aerial imagery this appears to be a residential house and I can find no such branch at https://mcdonalds.co.nz/find-us/restaurants.  Can you confirm this really exists?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164611707
ralley (2025-04-08 00:33:06+00:00): Reverted for fantasy mapping

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164656616
StreetSurveyor (2025-05-24 03:06:04+00:00): Please stop making this change. I am local and have surveyed this, the road was correct as I had it tagged.
Joseph R P (2025-05-24 03:39:34+00:00): How would you being local and surveying it make it correct that a random little narrow side street is a primary road, and that an unrelated short section of highway is part of a different mainline freeway? There are universal guidelines to follow for highway classification, and these also wouldn't even meet the Rhode Island state-specific highway classification guidelines.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-07 00:55:34+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17519
vectorial8192 (2025-04-11 16:08:25+00:00): Hi there, please see note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4705824
GR-menneke (2025-04-07 19:25:19+00:00): Dear abs8. What's confusing for you? The official streetname in Geel is 'Grotesteenweg', in Westerlo it is 'Grote Steenweg'.
kabelhaai (2025-04-09 14:22:33+00:00): Ja, de grens verspringt hier continu en de helft van de gebouwen waren daardoor verkeerd getagd. Lijkt nu in orde. Het is een ingewikkelde situatie.
Allison P (2025-04-07 05:12:34+00:00): This garage offers paid public parking. It is not private.
Synchrotronus (2025-04-08 01:39:50+00:00): Thanks, is fixed
Glassman (2025-04-07 18:26:47+00:00): It looks like you accidentally connected a track to a power line near bullfrog road. Can you fix it?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164613386
zsjeff (2025-04-08 23:00:37+00:00): I have disconnected the trail from the power line. One of my first edits on OSM, and I am now aware of the issue and will be more careful in the future. Thanks.
Glassman (2025-04-09 00:16:17+00:00): Not problem. It's a very common error we all make.
Glassman (2025-04-07 18:31:00+00:00): Typically, we tag asphalt ways as  highway=footway, Because OSM started in England we use British English terms. footways are similar to a sidewalk in the US.And since it is adjacent to a road, it's tagged as highway=footway + footway=sidewalk
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164613423
Kovoschiz (2025-04-07 04:18:20+00:00): Please don't remove other names. Use `*_name=` to add other names.
Kovoschiz (2025-04-07 04:19:34+00:00): Please don't add random `place=` by your standards.  Them and `name=` needs to be in common public use currently.
b-jazz (2025-04-08 05:37:40+00:00): RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/795834984

It's great that you're cleaning up some golf course errors, but you are causing further cleanup tasks down the road. If you are going to exclude the green from the fairway, you at least need to butt the fairway up to the green and share all of the nodes in between. See the golf_course wiki for some examples: https://osm.wiki/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls

Thanks. If there is anything unclear, please reach out and let me know.
b-jazz (2025-04-08 05:39:43+00:00): RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/798162746

And when you go around the green, please try to match the level of detail/refinement of the original green. This green is rather well defined but the fairway going around the fringe uses only around a dozen nodes. Thanks.
okadatsuneo_import (2025-04-08 04:54:05+00:00): 三菱電機伊丹製作所の間を通る道路を西宮豊中線に変更されましたが、それはどこにある情報でしょうか？
Tokumiki0 (2025-04-10 12:52:58+00:00): 兵庫県公報 令和6年度第601号P.3 「(令和7年)兵庫県告示第197号 道路の供用の開始」に掲載されている内容の反映です。ここの備考で塚口本町6丁目北交差点内を除く区間の西宮豊中線としての予定地表記が削除されました。
https://web.pref.hyogo.lg.jp/kk32/koho/documents/20250321t.pdf
okadatsuneo (2025-04-10 13:20:48+00:00): なるほど。
ありがとうございます。
pwbriggs (2025-04-08 01:09:16+00:00): Thanks for the contribution. In iD, you can select an object and press `q` to square its corners to 90 degrees, which is usually correct. I've done that in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164657071. Thanks again and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
jhaluska80 (2025-04-07 17:16:53+00:00): Hi Jay,  I see you've gotten into mapping.  I have done a lot of mapping in the area as well (including this DMV).

These changes to DMV needs further work as the way you mapped it indicates that there are physical barriers between the lanes.  This can end up confusing GPS systems as they might think you're in a lane that you're not and not realize you can still physically (although not legally) switch lanes.

So if you enjoy doing mapping there are two tags you should learn.  The placement tag and the change tag.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:change

The change lets you set the solid lines for the roads and is useful in a lot of situations like this.

Neither of these tags get visualized in the default web editor (Id) and honestly are easy to tag incorrectly without visualization, so most of us heavy mappers use JOSM with a plugin (Lane and Road attributes) to add and visualize them.

Let me know if you need any help.
Jay-does (2025-04-09 02:24:19+00:00): That’s something I would like to learn. I’m really new on this.
Supaplex (2025-04-25 03:32:08+00:00): 這棟怪怪的
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1375474803
在鎮公所旁邊而且與道路交叉?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164614836
nfx2851 (2025-04-25 03:35:09+00:00): 誤植的，感謝修正，這棟是馬光那邊的
aharvey (2025-04-08 03:46:16+00:00): I've made some adjustments in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164659060 in particular moved the name to the building way.

Was it intentional to move Budget Avis Car Rental? Or was that accidential?
Carlos Martin Noriega (2025-04-07 04:42:12+00:00): This node is broken; something strange happened with the editor.
I can't delete it.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12735748865#map=19/-85.051129/20.681969
muralito (2025-04-07 16:55:50+00:00): Hola Carlos. ¿Como te ayudo? ¿Elimino ese nodo o lo muevo a las coordenadas que indiques?¿O revierto el cambio por completo?
Carlos Martin Noriega (2025-04-08 04:39:49+00:00): si. elimina el nodo, por favor.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12735748865#map=19/-85.051129/20.681969
muralito (2025-04-08 17:42:18+00:00): Listo!
Carlos Martin Noriega (2025-04-08 18:43:04+00:00): Gracias!
user_5359 (2025-04-11 07:37:51+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1375206832. What is the mean of the tags 
ренда мопедов = да
аренда байко = да
?
mavl (2025-05-13 15:09:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
sunaree Supho (2025-04-25 19:56:19+00:00): 441554289Y4541644034v2
941124318v2
1047975583v4
Roydon Olive (2025-04-08 00:16:11+00:00): Looks like the changeset comment was incorrect. This is just adding a u turn restriction, nothing about keypads.
Lkumar_lyft (2025-04-10 08:37:43+00:00): Hi Roydon Olive, I’m Lalit and I’m a mapper in the OSM team at Lyft.
Thanks for noticing it and letting me know. I will take care of such mistakes in the future.
Herwescheluc (2025-04-08 06:51:03+00:00): Guten Morgen, Telefonteflon,

schön, das Du zu OSM gefunden hast daher erstmal ein "Herzlich willkommen"!

Zu diesem Änderungssatz habe ich eine Frage:

Ist Frau Matern umgezogen in die 48?

Wenn dem so ist, gehört dieser POI an die passende Adresse geschoben, den an dieser Stelle ist die 4 definitiv richtig.

Da mir auch an anderen Änderungen von Dir Auffälligkeiten untergekommen sind, werde ich versuchen, Dir dort einige Tipps zu geben, Du kannst Dich aber auch jederzeit gerne mit einer Frage an mich wenden.

Herzliche Grüße aus Herborn

Andreas
Telefonteflon (2025-04-08 08:13:51+00:00): Hallo Andreas,

vielen lieben Dank für das freundliche Willkommen heißen und die sachliche Kritik, mit der ich gut weiterarbeiten kann :) . Aller Anfang ist schwer und erfordert Einarbeitung. Genau - Frau Matern ist zur Marburger Straße 48 umgezogen. Ich versuche mich mal am verschieben des POIs.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-29 05:13:09+00:00): Hello!

You used
amenity=event_venue
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1375460915/history

Have you maybe meant
amenity=events_venue
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
TheLNL (2025-05-02 08:08:53+00:00): Yes, Fixed the typo
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-05-22 10:40:24+00:00): This changeset added an only_left_turn restriction disallowing through traffic.
anautiyal_lyft (2025-08-06 11:08:48+00:00): Hi, Spaghetti Monster!
I deeply apologize for my delayed response and the incorrect implementation of turn restriction. There is indeed  no_left_turn sign in the place. Thank you very much for correcting my mistake.

Best regards, Abhishek
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-18 02:05:17+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165093515
NorthCrab_upload (2025-04-07 06:00:48+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/698281809

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Iga | Yanosik (2025-04-07 06:05:36+00:00): Poprawione.
Herwescheluc (2025-04-08 07:27:51+00:00): Guten Morgen, Telefonteflon,

hier ist die Frage: Ist da jetzt was anderes, oder steht die Einrichtung einfach leer? Dann gilt das gleiche Vorgehen wie bei Metzgerei und Gasstätte. Wenn der "Laden" aber z.B. nun Wohnung ist, dann kann man auch mal löschen...

Grüße aus Herborn

Andreas
Telefonteflon (2025-04-08 08:22:43+00:00): Hallo Andreas,

auch hier wieder einen herzlichen Dank.
Die Halle steht leer. der Parkplatz davor wird von B+S Automobile als Stellfläche für Fahrzeuge genutzt. Die Halle wird (nach meinem Wissen und Beschilderung) nicht genutzt.
Herwescheluc (2025-04-08 19:08:15+00:00): In Rücksprache mit dem Mapper zurückgesetzt, helfe einem Neueinsteiger beim korrekten Erfassen.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164694511
Herwescheluc (2025-04-08 07:00:36+00:00): Guten Morgen, Telefonteflon,

hier eine weitere Anmerkung, auch, weil Du um Überprüfung gebeten hast:

An dieser Stelle und auch bei der Metzgerei hast Du den node komplett gelöscht. Das wird nach Möglichkeit in OSM vermieden, da fast immer etwas Neues auf das Vergangene folgt und man so die Historie hinter einem Eintrag erhalten kann. Der erste Eintrag an diesem node ist immerhin schon über 15 Jahre alt! (siehe: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/672488021/history)

Für geschlossene Einrichtungen, abgerissene Häuser, stillgelegte Eisenbahn und vieles andere gibt es die sogenannten Lifecycle-tags (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lebenszyklus-Pr%C3%A4fix). Damit läßt sich alles beschreiben ohne zu Löschen, auf der "Karte" ist dann aber alles unsichtbar. 

Ich würde daher die beiden Änderungen rückgängig machen wollen und Dir gerne Hilfe anbieten, diese dann neu zu erfassen.

Wärest Du einverstanden?

Grüße aus Herborn

Andreas
Telefonteflon (2025-04-08 08:18:24+00:00): Hallo Andreas (auch hier),

na klar bin ich damit einverstanden :)
Vielen Dank für die Prüfung und ich bin absolut dafür Historien nachvollziehbar zu dokumentieren.

Danke für Deine Prüfung und Hilfe hier.

Viele Grüße!
Herwescheluc (2025-04-08 19:28:18+00:00): Guten Abend, Telefonteflon,

habe jetzt 3x revertiert und neu erfasst:

1.) Metzgerei: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164695048 = name ist richtig, wenn der Name noch an der Hauswand steht, disused, weil der Laden ja noch da ist - aber ungenutzt.

2.) Die Gaststätte: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164695053 = heißt ja immer noch so und kan jederzeit wieder öffnen, alle Kontaktdaten sind aber passe, deshalb was:xxx.

3.) Die Mucki-Bude: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164695057 = Das Gebäude habe ich auf commercial geändert, dafür wurde es gebaut, der name ist nun old, der steht bestimmt nicht mehr da, das Gewerbe ist völlig aufgegeben, daher abandoned. Hier wäre noch die Hausnummer interessant, die an der Wand hängt (wenn dem so ist), erstmal habe ich aber nohousenumber eingetragen, falls wirklich keine da ist.

Hoffe, damit gehelft zu haben...

Gut's Nächtle

Andreas
Herwescheluc (2025-04-08 07:39:35+00:00): Guten Morgen, Telefonteflon,

dieser Eintrag ist ein gutes Beispiel, was man alles ergänzen könnte, wenn man denn vor Ort genau recherchiert.

Was da möglich wäre zeigt Dir das wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity=charging%20station?uselang=de

Es lohnt sich, die Hinweise dort immer gut durch zu gehen und sich auch durch verschiedene Weiterleitungen zu klicken!

Eine weiter gute Möglichkeit, offene Fragen beantwortet zu bekommen ist das Forum der Community: https://community.openstreetmap.org/

Schau Dich da mal in Ruhe um, Du wirst im Laufe der Zeit sicher das ein oder andere Aha-Erlebnis haben.

Grüße aus Herborn

Andreas
Branko Kokanovic (2025-04-08 09:36:33+00:00): Zdravo, dupllirao si put, vec je postojao ovde, jedan mora da se izbrise. Takodje, ovo mu nije ime u RGZ-u, jezerska se zove tek severnije od naselja Jezero.
Branko Kokanovic (2025-04-09 18:03:16+00:00): ispravio sam sve, sve u redu sad
MaciekMma (2025-04-07 08:19:42+00:00): whats the reason? this shop is still there, at least it was there yesterday (2025-04-07)
Herwescheluc (2025-04-08 19:08:16+00:00): In Rücksprache mit dem Mapper zurückgesetzt, helfe einem Neueinsteiger beim korrekten Erfassen.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164694511
14im (2025-04-09 21:53:09+00:00): A croire cette carte de la métropole (https://data-lmm.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/0682fbc0b8b04a7b82fd9ca4dff14b1b_0/explore?location=47.993231%2C0.195752%2C18.60) et le site même de l'agence, le code postal serait plutôt 72100.
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2025-04-10 06:51:30+00:00): Bonjour,

Merci pour votre alerte.
En effet, nous allons corriger le code postal

Cordialement,
L'Equipe DB
TrickyFoxy (2025-08-12 23:41:16+00:00): 👋  https://osm.org/way/1375503080 что значит ID=2297 ?
Thirdy Bobiles (2025-04-10 07:39:24+00:00): This situation is confusing. As a resident of The Glens at Parkspring Village, I have noticed that building permits here fall under Barangay San Antonio, San Pedro, Laguna. Additionally, some physical boundary markers indicate that this area, along with 'Cristina Homes', is part of San Pedro, Laguna. It would be beneficial for the locals if the borders (east of The Glens along the Zapote River) were adjusted, as this discrepancy complicates navigation for TNVS and deliveries and affects prices. While there is evidence of Salawag's extensive border, which should be negotiated with San Pedro if necessary, we reside under the administrative region of Barangay San Antonio, San Pedro, Laguna.
Wulfmorn (2025-04-07 09:06:27+00:00): If its in the same location, i would suggest just editing the POI, rather than deleting the old and creating the new. It makes it easier to see the history of the location. Not a huge problem, but its my suggestion :)
gmc3000 (2025-04-07 11:04:43+00:00): Well, the old POI was just a point that was part of the road, not a real POI. But good point, I should probably have extracted the point to a POI of itself (not part of the road), and then changed it. Will keep that in mind for next time, thanks for the suggestion!
NeisBot (2025-04-07 06:51:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2025-04-11 08:19:05+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/164803548
NeisReview (2025-04-07 18:30:37+00:00): #NodeDragging

Hello, and welcome to OSM.

Thank you for contributing to the map. I’ve reviewed your recent edits and noticed that at least one node of a way was moved. This can sometimes happen unintentionally, and it’s led to some unusual intersections or overlaps between street segments and other map elements.

Could you kindly confirm whether these changes were intentional or if they may have been made by mistake?

Thank you, and I look forward to your response!
---
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1790716119
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/33390383
Evan Carroll (2025-08-08 20:09:52+00:00): Why did you remove the addresses here? If theses bars map to the building one to one, the nodes should be merged with the ways. Not stripped of their addresses.
skquinn (2025-08-08 20:24:42+00:00): I can merge the nodes with the buildings, and I agree that's the right way to do it. Though note that at least one of these buildings has/had two bars in it (I want to say 308 but it's been a while).
woodpeck_repair (2025-04-07 23:30:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 164655851 where the changeset comment is: revert sockpuppet edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17523
woodpeck_repair (2025-04-07 23:30:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 164655851 where the changeset comment is: revert sockpuppet edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17523
TrickyFoxy (2025-04-07 21:46:14+00:00): 👋 В правом меню редактора есть кнопка «Настройки фонового изображения». Выберите там спутниковые снимки ESRI — они свежее
elsy1 (2025-04-07 11:31:20+00:00): why you keep make account after osm baning your accounts  please stop  are you human?!
elsy1 (2025-04-07 11:33:25+00:00): his older account that blocked:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Seyed%20Amin
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Maziar%20Soltanpour
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Amir%20Arsalaan
NorthCrab_upload (2025-04-07 07:31:46+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12736057233
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/289232730

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Taya_S (2025-04-07 08:00:44+00:00): Hello mranderson2025,

Would you mind explaining what was wrong with the alt_names added by  Kovoschiz?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164613506
Kovoschiz left you a comment here. It is generally better to discus tagging disagreements.

Best regards,
Taya Snijder, on behalf of OSM’s Data Working Group
Kovoschiz (2025-04-07 16:53:15+00:00): For reference, that was added and re-added by a few dubious users who often add historical or personal names. This was corrected twice by reputable users already.
mranderson2025 (2025-04-08 07:28:39+00:00): Hi Taya_S,
The current name for this node is actually that of node 9555455896, which is already demolished. Lung Wo Shan is indeed the accurate name for this hill according to various sources. Yet Kovoschiz is holding their own judgement against other users, calling others as "dubious" while themselves is incorrect and refusing to admit. As a result, large amounts of wrong information is persisting on the Hong Kong map.
Kovoschiz (2025-04-08 16:26:00+00:00): @Taya_S
I mostly refrain from making judgements on mountain-side toponyms. This was corrected by https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/minghong , and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/HKHikerhang the latter of whom has even made it to the news by holding a press conference about many users adding historical or personal names causing hiker confusion, even potentially risking their lives when they call rescue. Ref DWG tickets #2022033110000028 , #2022120210000048 , #2024022610000063 for previous incidents, where sock puppets have appeared repeatedly. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Supaplex/diary/399062  
This has been noticed by the community (not me) at least 5 more years earlier in 2016 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Zh-hant:Hong_Kong_tagging#Place_Names
In this case, the involved users are difficult to track down, as they have deleted their account, similar to many of those offending users, and sock puppets. For now, I could only see they are "charmaine_pui_ting" (uid=17048038) and "hkpeakname"(uid=15436648) from Better OSM. OSMCha purged their database, so finding older changesets are more difficult. I can't say these two absolutely bad, but they definitely have mixed records at least. Need to do more digital forensics/archaeology to be sure.