piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
BrandonMountain (2026-04-20 15:02:55+00:00): Hello alaaan021, I’ve reclassified the road back to secondary as its characteristics and function in the network better match the OSM Wiki Guidelines. It mentions secondary roads are “used to tag arterial roads of lesser importance than primary roads” and “form a link in the national route network” (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dsecondary). It also doesn’t show the level of connectivity or traffic importance typically expected of a primary road. I also noticed there was a secondary classification gap (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/722726521). Thanks for your response, and happy mapping!

--Tradução Automática--

Olá, alaaan021! Reclassifiquei a via de volta para secondary, pois suas características e função na rede se alinham melhor com as Diretrizes da Wiki do OSM. O texto menciona que as vias secondary são "usadas para etiquetar vias arteriais de menor importância do que as vias primary" e que "formam um elo na rede nacional de rotas" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dsecondary). Além disso, ela não apresenta o nível de conectividade ou a importância em termos de tráfego tipicamente esperados de uma via primary. Notei também que havia uma lacuna na classificação secondary (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/722726521). Obrigado pela sua resposta e boas edições!
Sergei Amuzinski (2026-04-17 07:14:59+00:00): Hi! Thanks for your contribution. I noticed a oneway tag was added to Way 151696294, but I’m not sure it’s correct. If you check the Esri World Imagery (at zoom level 19), the road markings clearly indicate two-way traffic.
Could you please double-check this? Perhaps it was an accidental edit, or do you have more recent information about the signs there? It would be great to make sure the data matches the reality. Thanks!
NeisBot (2026-04-16 15:30:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13653091494 v5

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Stereo repair shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisAgent (2026-04-16 16:33:24+00:00): 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again?
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-01 11:07:56+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags/values in changeset 184907904

https://osm.org/changeset/184907904
Bienson (2026-04-17 00:30:26+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181435565 - ALKIS Umrisse des Wohnhauses Königsheide 248 wiederhergestellt (siehe iD-Hintergrund "NRW Liegenschaftskataster"). Außerdem unsinniges Tagging um https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20456236

Verlassene Gebäude sind weiterhin building=* - disused=yes kann ergänzt werden.
Wildsharky (2026-04-17 12:20:21+00:00): Revert of 181406698
ilias_ (2026-04-17 15:47:02+00:00): Hi, thanks for your edits in Casablanca. I was just curious how you determined the road width.
pnd_ku (2026-04-21 13:41:37+00:00): Hi! I`ve roughly measured the same type of road (residental 4 narrow lanes) in a safe place, there are plenty of the same type roads around. The error is within a half-meter.
ilias_ (2026-04-23 00:31:09+00:00): In that case, since it's an estimation, please use est_width instead of width. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:width?uselang=en#Estimated_values

It says "If the width couldn't be exactly determined or is estimated, use the key est_width=* instead."
pnd_ku (2026-04-24 10:56:25+00:00): Good to know, thanks 🙏
Higashimado (2026-04-17 02:43:51+00:00): 您好，欢迎来到 OSM 中国社区

请注意自然村及小组的范围，若有行政上明确定义的，应使用 boundary=administrative 作为行政边界，行政边界不应与道路、用地等其他要素粘连；通常情况下，中国大陆境内的自然村仅作为点标记为 place=hamlet 即可

若您有其他不确定的事项，宜参考《中国标注指南》：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hans:%E4%B8%AD%E5%9B%BD%E6%A0%87%E6%B3%A8%E6%8C%87%E5%8D%97

祝您编辑愉快
JuanElDemografo (2026-04-16 23:36:33+00:00): You seem to have copied the tags from a house in Georgia to an apartment complex in California.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181420302
Saftsemmel (2026-04-16 16:13:47+00:00): what is this change based on?
Geocrest (2026-06-29 18:15:04+00:00): Hi Saftsemmel, thank you for reaching out. I overlooked the tunnel tag and and fixed non-existing issues. Changeset reverted to its previous state. Thank you for your understanding.
iandees (2026-04-16 16:19:38+00:00): Hello! I noticed that nodes https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11950654024, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11950696397 were moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181421984, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
dypa (2026-04-17 14:52:40+00:00): Пожалуйста не выдумывайте адреса которых не существует. Адреса в РГИС нет. В ПКК Санкт-Петербург, город Колпино, Павловская улица, участок 8, (у дома 38/17)
Ozon OSM9 (2026-04-17 15:32:23+00:00): Здравствуйте. Спасибо за комментарий. Взял номер участка из ПКК. Постараемся уточнить корректный адрес именно этого дома и вернёмся к правке.
aTarom (2026-04-16 17:28:33+00:00): Hola, por alguna razón te quedan los tags de 
"board_type"
vacíos de valor
tienes alguna pista del por? entiendo que es un bug quizás de StreetComplete pero no tengo tiempo de investigarlo
Saludos
NeisBot (2026-04-16 16:12:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13679895944 v5

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Orthodontic clinic"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisAgent (2026-04-16 22:33:12+00:00): 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again?
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-01 11:02:08+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags/values in changeset 184907678

https://osm.org/changeset/184907678
NeisBot (2026-04-16 16:15:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13680274449 v5

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Orthodontic clinic"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisAgent (2026-04-16 22:33:13+00:00): 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again?
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-01 11:00:01+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags/values in changeset 184907593

https://osm.org/changeset/184907593
eggie (2026-04-16 16:29:34+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
richlv (2026-04-16 19:27:59+00:00): Yay, thanks - I also see that a community member has already removed the descriptive names and adjusted tags from pier to boardwalk.
Some docs on the name tag: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only .

You are also very welcome in the Latvian OSM community chat at https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com .
HellMap (2026-04-17 09:53:02+00:00): This cycleway section https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/909367317 has motor_vehicle=designated. I assume this was a mistake? Or were you attempting to specify which way is used to access the parking/service road?

This parking https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1063716664 has access=permit. How is this signed on the ground? If it's one of those "tikai ar atļaujām" signs, then the access will be private, because on OSM permit means anyone from public could purchase/acquire it.
Romāns S-Z (2026-04-20 10:06:19+00:00): Hi ! Thanks Richlv!

Hell HellMap!  In the nature - this road is indeed market with restriction to cars, unfortunatly I don't recall which speciefically(but I can recon), disabled people and service vehicles are using this road to access GoWake and Caffe with parking spot you mentioned.

I am newbee so please correct if I am wrong:)
HellMap (2026-04-20 10:16:38+00:00): Yes, a survey would be needed for the exact signage. It's very hard to say otherwise and I am not familiar with the area. We can adjust the values then - I am not yet sure what they should be at the moment.

How do cars access this location - from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1063716658 direction ? You only tagged one section, so I am unsure which route they have to take.
NeisBot (2026-04-16 16:30:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13730622422 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Athletic club"

#MapWithoutSpam
OSMaper_xD (2026-04-18 14:31:46+00:00): Droga może i jest w trakcie teoretyczntm budowy, ale jeżeli jest prawie skończona zasługuje na access=no. Niepodstawny revert
Cy0nyx_PL (2026-04-21 15:16:07+00:00): właśnie, prawie. Droga jest w dalszym ciągu w trakcie budowy, brak odbiorów. Po dokonaniu odbiorów, a przed otwarciem można uznać, że droga jest wybudowane lecz bez dostępu (access=no)
Kovoschiz (2026-04-16 18:08:05+00:00): 1. You broke it by removing `vehicle:backward=no` 
2. Why remove `change=no` ?
Kovoschiz (2026-04-16 18:11:38+00:00): 3. Unrelated but, `=yes` vs `=designated` should be the same. Either you misunderstood, or they need to fix it.
NeisBot (2026-04-16 16:42:39+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 24 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1499957817 v1 | 4 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=181422856
SekeRob (2026-04-18 16:10:48+00:00): Hi fbyron

This 'outbuilding' you mapped got flagged because the street name in addr:street was incorrect... it's Strada Pandolfi, not Via. Since I did not remember that building ever having been there I put a note on it and today cycled by and took some pictures.
1) There are per a sign 2 parochial functions covered here at this location for San Giovanni B. and San Benedetto A. Also the parking/pedestrian area this is an Emergency Assembly Point.
https://d2exd72xrrp1s7.cloudfront.net/www/1o/1oegvebzxq8s91bhbxv2x8w0ny5r91teu2-p698501425-full/19da0ad15f9?width=1680&crop=false&q=70
2) The building you mapped is not above ground and remembering the construction period which took longer, there's no underground facility. Can only see an area that is blocked by movable bollards and planters. At times these are moved to the side to add more parking space but that is only rarely.
https://d2exd72xrrp1s7.cloudfront.net/www/41/41e6i173jhvy1pjftny8fhz2w5r91tfoe-p698501444-full/19da0ad1a32?width=1680&crop=false&q=70
Please let me know what's up with this. The wiki says this tag is used for minor/secondary builings but not regular outdoor areas. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Doutbuilding
For now, I'll map the whole area including the backside parts, parking, pitch as a religious landuse zone. Maybe you can explain the source of the building, but on the ground per my survey today (follow image links above to view), it does not exist.

Happy Mapping
SekeRob

PS, we don't put descriptions of gates, ways etc in the name tag. I've removed those while reviewing your mappings of the past week. You can put those in 'description=*' and 'description:it=*' (latter tag is for those who choose to show the map in Italian instead of default English.
NeisBot (2026-04-16 16:57:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13682256437 v5

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Orthodontic clinic"

#MapWithoutSpam
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-01 11:00:36+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags/values in changeset 184907620

https://osm.org/changeset/184907620
ChrissW-R1 (2026-04-17 19:23:42+00:00): Please check https://osm.org/note/5254363
VLD318 (2026-04-17 20:38:27+00:00): Hi ChrissW-R1, 

Thank you for pointing this out. I have updated the crossing node and way to crossing=uncontrolled in changeset 181475675.

VLD318 / Owen
b-jazz (2026-04-28 03:53:32+00:00): Hi! It looks like the website URL on way/1499962733 may have been copied from Google Maps (it contained Google tracking parameters). Please be careful not to copy information from Google into OpenStreetMap, as Google's data is copyrighted.

cc: @iandees
cyanopossum (2026-04-28 14:47:55+00:00): @b-jazz thanks for letting me know! i figured this out myself after uploading these changes. did a lot of wiki reading and have been getting into the weeds with josm, will change this as soon as i can!
pantufla (2026-06-08 23:42:02+00:00): Hola Pedro, estás agregando varias zonas que ya estaban. A qué se debe? Ahora están duplicadas o hasta triplicadas.
NeisBot (2026-04-16 17:12:41+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 8 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1499957817 v2 | 4 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=181424132
Wildsharky (2026-04-21 03:28:58+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:181539543
NeisBot (2026-04-16 17:26:18+00:00): 🌍 Welcome to OSM, adha619.
Thanks for contributing!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

✅ Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Removed residential roads"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment
NeisBot (2026-04-16 17:26:20+00:00): 🌍 Welcome to OSM, tamarreco.
Thanks for contributing!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

✅ Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added new nodes and ways"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment
Dimitar155 (2026-04-16 17:54:41+00:00): Имате правилна интуиция, но не е точно така. Мултиполигона трябва да съдържа само външния контур на сградата и "дупката" със съответно outer и inner за роли. building:part не следва да е част от мултиполигона. За пример вижте relation/4204478.
MarcoR (2026-04-16 20:27:36+00:00): Hi!
That shop has been replaced by this tax advisor: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3726092787

There is no any trace of Videodrome on the ground (except for some graffiti made after Federico Frusciante death).

Happy mapping,
Marco.
user_10901495 (2026-04-16 20:57:41+00:00): Hi,
you're right, it's not useful to have a POI without anything in the real world to back it up.
I'm gonna delete it now.

Thank you for your feedback.
Martino
joost schouppe (2026-04-20 07:58:38+00:00): Hi,
We harmonized all firestations in Belgium, see the wiki here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Belgium/Firestations
Some remarks:
- ref:BE:HZ is a new idea I guess. In my opinion it is unneeded, because the operator:wikidata has the same info, is already complete for Belgium and doesn't rely on spelling always being the same
- addr:country is unneeded
- emergency=fire_station is not used in Belgium, not documented and only 50 times used in the world
- same remark for contact:phone:alternative. You could just add it under contact:phone
- fire_station:type is used (as documented on the wiki above) as being about being a main station or a support station. It might be interesting to add information about whether it is ran by professionals or volunteers (though I though often it is both?), but lets not shift the meaning of an existing tag!
silversurfer83 (2026-04-19 19:31:50+00:00): moin :)

da hier nur das Gebäude als building=hospital erfasst ist, ist das bei OSM alles so korrekt. Da ist *kein* amenity=hospital oder so und daher ist dein operator=* an dieser Stelle nicht angebracht.

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181425976
00-sq (2026-04-16 18:05:23+00:00): This changeset will be reverted later due to getting errors from osm-revert
00-sq (2026-04-17 13:31:31+00:00): RESOLVED: I managed to manually repair the geometry in changeset 181458249. The relation is rendering again.
NeisBot (2026-04-16 18:03:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13735316507 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "massage therapist"

#MapWithoutSpam
Jordi MF (2026-04-16 18:34:44+00:00): Hola Swedish Flow,
¿Este comercio está situado en un bajo comercial o solo tiene servicio a domicilio? ¿Si alguien acude a este lugar, encontrará el comercio? Muchas gracias y un saludo.
Swedish Flow (2026-04-16 20:18:10+00:00): Hola Jordi, muchas gracias por tu rápida respuesta. Disculpa si hice algún error en lo pin. El negocio funciona exclusivamente a domicilio y no tiene local físico, por lo que estoy intentando encontrar la mejor manera de ubicar el pin para un negocio remoto. Muchas gracias por tu ayuda y un saludo!
CAM-Gerlach (2026-05-26 01:55:01+00:00): Hola Swedish Flow,

Discuple por mi espanol feo--no soy un hispanohablante nativo.

Gracias para su respuesta rapido y honesto. En las OpenStreetMap tenemos una politica muy importante que se llama la "On the ground" regla--las coses que nos mapeamos necesitan tener https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Verificabilidad y existar en el mundo real en el position que estar en la mapa. Porque los servicios de massage no son disponibles aqui en el mundo real ("on the ground"), desafortunadamente no puede mapear aqui. Lo siento, pero nesesito hacer un "revert" de tus cambias (changeset) aqui. Le recomiendo que le anucie sus servicios en una directoria de empreses o otra servicio como eso en lugar de en un mapa.

!Buena suerte!
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-05-26 01:56:51+00:00): Reverted addition of SEO POI that the statement of the mapper doesn't exist as a physical business at this location

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183182938
grzegorz75jan (2026-04-16 19:32:19+00:00): Na jakiej podstawie zmieniłeś nazwę ulicy. 
Dlaczego w opisie zmiany użyłeś zwrotu poprawa trollingu.
Dawid2849 (2026-04-16 21:33:39+00:00): Przecież to prawidłowa nazwa i odnosi się do tej osoby: https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magdalena_Maria_Epstein

Zmianę wycofałem
Dawid2849 (2026-04-16 21:39:12+00:00): Zrzut ekranu ze strony TERYT: https://ibb.co/F4pgHBbK
user_23439163 (2026-04-17 13:43:44+00:00): Odkaz na českou wikipedii je správně. Proč na českém území značky mažeš?
Tomas_J (2026-04-18 21:12:55+00:00): Maže opakovaně i přes více upozornění přes komentáře i přes české osm diskusní fórum: názvy v name, zaniklé vesnice, odkazy na Wikipedii... Nic není v bezpečí.
mapperue (2026-04-18 21:49:57+00:00): To vím, že maže správné značky i přes upozornění. Právě proto jsem tuto i jiné sady změn vrátil.
Tomas_J (2026-04-19 01:48:32+00:00): Je to na blok od DWG?
mapperue (2026-04-19 06:56:34+00:00): Není to zatím nějaké rozsáhlé mazání, přidávání nesprávných nebo duplicitních wikidat nebo názvů. Snažím se domlouvat, ale zjevně nemá zájem obnovovat všechny správné značky nebo se vymlouvá, že to udělal někdo jiný.
Teď zase revertoval můj revert, takže u této PR opět smazal typ relace. Opravuji zatím, co se dá.
user_23439163 (2026-04-19 08:41:00+00:00): Revert byl proveden, protože mapperue smazal klíč wikimedia_commons bez náhrady.
user_23439163 (2026-04-19 09:05:59+00:00): Jo a má opravdu omylem smazaná značka boundary byla opravena. Opravdu to bylo z mé strany omylem.
Nicméně to, že mapperue maže odkazy na wikimedia_commons apod vpořádku není.
mapperue (2026-04-19 13:52:26+00:00): Nauč se nemazat značky a nikdo ti nebude vracet sady změn.
Lulucmy (2026-04-26 09:31:14+00:00): Hello,
Why was the northern part of the polygon removed?
Regards,
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181426590
eggie (2026-04-16 18:58:56+00:00): Hoi, Het kan wel zo.
Zelf gebruik ik dan liever de adresnodes of maak adresnodes bij.
Het schoolterrein maak ik dan één groot vlak met landuse=education. (rendert nog niet) en amenity=school (Wordt verwijderd als education gaat renderen.. Heb er een hard hoofd in) 
Kinderopvang tag ik met childcare. 

Aparte kleuterscholen (kindergarten) bestaan niet meer. Dat is onderbouw basisschool geworden.

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/amenity-kindergarten-of-amenity-childcare/91502


MVG
eggie
MapBtch (2026-04-16 20:06:22+00:00): Ik kan wel een oplossing in de "name" tag vinden. KDV en BSO zijn van zelfde organisatie en hebben identiek postadres. Dan gebruik ik de adresnode en maak van de naam  "KDV/BSO".    Dan blijven we het dichts bij de standaard werkwijze.