piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
joost schouppe (2025-07-28 08:09:06+00:00): Hi Staliom,
You deleted an emergency ward entrance here https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12299719011/history/1#map=19/50.748689/3.220760 and created a new regular entrance here https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12299719008
Are you sure the new entrance shouldn't be an emergency ward entrance too?
Staliom (2025-07-28 11:28:32+00:00): Hello Joost,

Sorry, I may have made a mistake in the node type chosen. The emergency entrance is now here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12299719006.

The main entrance is represented by this point: https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?node=12299719011#map=20/50.7487025/3.2206927
joost schouppe (2025-07-28 13:36:55+00:00): Ah, thanks for clarifying. No, it seems you edited in the way you wanted to. I did make a minor change; on the entrance you say is the main one, I classified it as such (one can chooses several types of entrance doors). But that's just a detail.
eggie (2025-07-05 15:41:23+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
rarad74 (2025-07-06 03:59:51+00:00): Hi. Please add comment to what you do on the map.
Thank you.
rantz5 (2025-07-06 04:52:58+00:00): some roads were closed in that region, and around the park from the right due to city ​​hall works that will last till 2028 (they say). I will do other changes in this area as I find them.
SverigeFan (2025-07-05 16:38:18+00:00): Sorry, titel should say "Saiva Camping", not Arctic RiverResort.
Natsu_ (2025-07-05 16:16:53+00:00): 城市更新、地铁施工等变更。
bdentremont (2025-09-11 17:51:01+00:00): FYI, this changeset with church which has been gone for years.
https://www.osm.org/note/4956347
SherbetS (2026-07-09 15:04:44+00:00): Hello,
When adding communication mast infrastructure, please use the "mast" preset in JOSM, not "communications tower".
Object: node/12980312189
See:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dcommunications_tower

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dmast

Thanks,
James
Andrew Chadwick (2025-07-05 17:10:51+00:00): OK if I grab the 35 to work on?
gmar5 (2025-07-05 19:42:33+00:00): Certainly, thank you. I have opened this note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4839913 to list a few others that I saw that need updating.
flohoff (2025-07-06 14:56:00+00:00): Moin Moritz,
die Straßen werden doch aktuell schon für den Bau der Häuser verwendet oder? Dann sollten die nicht auf construction stehen. Das war schon absicht das ich die mit residential getagged habe.

highway=construction wird nicht im routing genutzt. Das ist wie "nicht existent" - Da hier ja schon Bautätigkeit ist können die Baustoffhändler nicht zu den Grundstücken navigieren. Deshalb - wenn die Straße schon "benutzbar" ist - und wenn es nur Schotter ist - sollte das als residential drin sein.

Flo
flohoff (2025-07-06 15:01:27+00:00): Ich hab  nochmal drüber nachgedacht:

highway=construction ist nicht die "Baustraße" - highway=construction heisst das die Straße im Bau ist.

Sobald die Nutzbar ist ist das nicht mehr construction.

Flo
mooooore (2025-07-06 17:53:52+00:00): Deine Argumentation gehe ich mit, danke für die Änderung und die Hausnummern! Die Straße ist asphaltiert, mit der ein oder anderen Kante. Wenn man vorsichtig ist definitiv befahrbar.
flohoff (2025-07-06 18:44:15+00:00): Finaler Ausbau der Straßen kommt ja oft erst JAHRE (Oder sogar Jahrzehnte) nachdem da alles gebaut ist.

Die addressen und Flurstücke sind alle schon im ALKIS sichtbar - Da wird sich sicher im laufe des Neubaugebietes noch so einiges ändern. Aber das sind erstmal die zugewiesenen Addressen.

Flo
unni-geo (2025-07-08 16:35:13+00:00): FYI, habe das verschobene Gebäude zurückgeschoben, siehe:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168658688
BER319 (2025-07-08 17:08:09+00:00): upps vielen Dank dafür, da hatte ich wohl dicke Finger.

BER319
unni-geo (2025-07-09 20:28:26+00:00): Kein Ding, gerne!

Ach nebenbei, der Vespucci 21.0.4.0 Editor - mit dem Du hier die geänderten hochgeladen hast - meldet vor dem Upload nicht, das es überschneidende Gebäudeumrisse gibt? Kenne mich damit nicht aus, den habe ich tatsächlich noch nie verwendet...

Grüsse
BER319 (2025-07-10 18:54:20+00:00): Vespucci ist mehr oder weniger der kleine Bruder von JOSM. Den verwende ich, weil ich immer gleich alles vor Ort eintrage. Leider fehlen eben ein paar Kleinigkeiten. Mittlerweile merkt er aber wenn ich etwa Unstimmigkeiten an Relationen ändern möchte. Ich kann hier aber wie bei JOSM mit verschiedenen Layern arbeiten. 

VG und viel Erfolg beim Mappen 
BER319
NeisBot (2025-07-05 16:48:35+00:00): Hi 8051, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 97% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 2 highway(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=168531206
Glassman (2025-07-05 23:14:09+00:00): I see you are into mapping sidewalks which is one of my passions. One suggest that can help people with limited eyesight is to add the tactile pad, typically found where the curb is lowered. Though older crossings may not have a valid pad. 
 
I'm part of a group working on pedestrian mapping. Right now the best document we have is on the wiki at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Draft:Foundation/Local_Chapters/United_States/Pedestrian_Working_Group/Schema

We are working on more tools and wiki pages to help. 

Let me know if you are interested in learn more or helping out on our work.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168531554
Matt McCutchen (2025-07-16 18:24:43+00:00): This change looks good.  Thank you for the contribution!  I only found two minor issues:
1. https://osm.org/node/7515008604 should not be tagged highway=crossing because the intersecting way is not a road.  (It's unclear if the intersecting way represents a trail or a park boundary, but that's not our problem here.)  I went ahead and fixed this in https://osm.org/changeset/169027531.
2. https://osm.org/way/1412528283 has an extra node on the west end after the connection to the crossing.  That could be valid if the sidewalk extends a little beyond the crossing, but looking at the imagery, I think you may have intended to connect the crossing to the west endpoint of the sidewalk instead of the second node from the west.  I'll leave this for you to change if you feel it's appropriate.
NeisBot (2025-07-05 17:22:35+00:00): Hi 8051, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 94% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 3 highway(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=168532356
Szymson (2025-07-05 19:10:18+00:00): Spoko, ale teraz adresy we wszystkich budynkach też trzeba zmienić
VladaC (2025-07-05 18:14:35+00:00): Adding description: this is a partial revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163894834 - see my comment to that changeset. Corrections of way geometry.
NeisReview (2025-07-05 18:26:16+00:00): #NameCheck

Hello and welcome to OSM.

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits, particularly those concerning the names you've added or modified.

Some of these names caught my attention as they are quite unique or a bit unusual. Could you please confirm if these additions were intentional or if they might have been added mistakenly?

Looking forward to your response.

Thank you!
grzegorz75jan (2025-07-05 19:57:02+00:00): "Dodałem" Pytam się co dodałeś bo wszystkie edycje z góry na dół mają "opis" zmian "dodałem"

Mam propozycję nie do odrzucenia. Zastosuj się przy kolejnych edycjach do 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian

https://youtu.be/xBMIoypkdI4?list=PLTgtPjgzssHzsgAqYbi2QfRoRk1S9ioX5&t=2596 

lub wykonam jedną hurtową edycję w której będzie pełno numerów zmian z opisem wycofuję zmiany użytkownika Soczek2752 polegającą na wycofaniu zmian  zawierających "dodałem".

Ciekawe bo ruszyłeś las "profesjonalnego" malarza lasów. Bardzo go lubię za radosną twórczość więc parę zmian mu już wycofałem.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168534395
NeisBot (2025-07-05 18:36:51+00:00): Hi Mito 7, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Added access and surface details to a way, including restrictions and physical characteristics."

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish #AIgenerated
NeisReview (2025-07-05 20:00:18+00:00): #DataImport

Hi, welcome to OSM!

With this and your latest changesets, you've added a significant number of features that appear to share similarities in their tags. Could you please let us know more about the source of your mapping activity? Is this a data import?

Looking forward to hearing from you.

Thanks!
Moldovan_Merkator (2025-07-06 12:44:08+00:00): Hi Pascal! Glad to hear you, i like very much HDYC, it's very useful for reviewing OSM edits! About the data added by me, yes, partially this data is an import, it was reworked by me, and adapted to OSM parameters. The data is from national cadastral map. About the copyright, the data was downloaded from the WFS Geoserver and can be downloaded freely by anyone, because there are no limitations for public access. Thanks for interest and have a nice!
NeisReview (2025-07-06 13:10:46+00:00): Thank you for your response and explanations regarding your changes. Could you also specify a license for the data? If I understand correctly, this should be included with each changeset. Thanks & best regards.
Moldovan_Merkator (2025-07-06 14:15:03+00:00): No license is specified for this data, only that there are "No limitations to public access". I'll ask the cadastral authority about that. About the changesets, yes, I think you're right, in future I'll mention that.
NeisReview (2025-07-06 14:19:45+00:00): 👍 Thank you.

#HappyMapping
notmyproblem1 (2025-07-06 16:40:37+00:00): Ciao md_76, Il ristorante che hai modificato cambia anche categoria? 
Fammi sapere
Grazie :)
md_76 (2025-07-06 18:07:49+00:00): Ciao,
direi che è più un bar dove è possibile far colazione, un pranzo veloce e un aperitivo alla sera
yrtimiD (2025-07-19 16:58:30+00:00): Hi Tsur, why would you change these tags? 
at the moment you say "highway=residential" - this means construction is finished, which is not the case here. 

see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dconstruction
Tsur Halamish (2025-07-19 17:04:57+00:00): Indeed its still in construction.
Earlier I took w30772778 out of construction so now its back. Note that  now w30772778 has construction=yes.
yrtimiD (2025-07-19 20:54:01+00:00): construction=yes along with highway=residential doesn't work.
must be highway=construction and optionally construction=residential.
or, construction: prefix can be used as alternative.
yrtimiD (2025-07-21 14:12:44+00:00): so, I'll revert your changes, if you don't mind...
Tsur Halamish (2025-07-22 10:57:51+00:00): NP. Go ahead.
archie (2025-07-06 19:23:37+00:00): Hej, du har bytt namn på flera ställen från St1 till andra namn (här i Alingsås har du bytt namn på den vanliga macken till "CNG Alingsås" - https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/726639691). Jag kan inte se att det har skett ett namnbyte. Kan du förklara? Vad är källan till de nya namn?
sa7cnd (2025-07-07 07:03:46+00:00): Hej, tack för återkoppling, alltid intressant.
Jag har lagt in många biogas-stationer för att underlätta att hitta dem. Jag brukar namnge nya stationer CNG stad väderstreck.
I detta fall fanns redan ett standardnamn, och jag tycks ha glömt lägga det som Alternate Name. Om du tycker det är smakligare, ändrar jag gärna tillbaka och lägger CNG Alingsås som Alternate Name.
Mvh
eggie (2025-07-05 19:41:45+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
grzegorz75jan (2025-07-05 22:48:32+00:00): Za chwilę wleci komentarz zachęcający.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168535442
grzegorz75jan (2025-07-05 22:51:12+00:00): Ostrzegałem i informowałem oraz nie otrzymałem odpowiedzi. Wycofuję zmianę ze względu na notoryczne błędy oraz brak odpowiedzi. Polecą też inne edycje.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168541697
NeisBot (2025-07-05 19:16:35+00:00): Hi OneNKode, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Added a node and modified a way's geometry."

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish #AIgenerated
NorthCrab_upload (2025-07-05 19:21:16+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1412558028

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
feket (2025-07-08 14:36:29+00:00): Kedves OneNKode!
Üdvözöllek az OSM közösségben!
A "javítás" megjegyzéssel ellátott szerkesztésed első ránézésre rombolásnak tűnik. Az épületek geometriáját legalábbis eléggé sikerül összekuszálni. 
Javaslom, hogy mielőtt komolyabb szerkesztésbe kezdenél, olvasd el a kezdőknek szóló leírást itt: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hu:Beginners%27_guide és várunk a közösség csatornáin is, ahol tapasztalt szerkesztőket kérdezhetsz: 
https://www.openstreetmap.hu/rolunk 

Üdv.: feket
eggie (2025-07-05 19:44:51+00:00): Tip...  Probeer het gebied van je edits te beperken. Editor iD is berucht om schade te veroorzaken als je schuift met de kaart in editmodus.

MVG
eggie
czebureks (2025-09-05 01:26:19+00:00): Cześć! Dzięki za edycje w Gdańsku i okolicach. Wydaje mi się, że w przypadku garaży powinniśmy jednak trzymać się tego, co jest w oficjalnej ewidencji (EGiB) by uniknąć chaosu - a więc byłbym za tym, by przywrócić 5 garaży zamiast jednego dużego budynku garażowego.
eggie (2025-07-05 19:45:46+00:00): Top!
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-24 20:19:31+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12980652670/history has shop = bazar that was added in this edit
shop=bazar ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop or https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Tag_descriptions_for_key_%22shop%22 fitting? Maybe new value needs to be invented? Maybe this data is wrong and there is no shop here? Maybe it is not a shop but something else?
NeisBot (2025-07-05 21:16:27+00:00): Hi Famijos, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Updated railway status to disused on one way"

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish #AIgenerated
mavl (2026-05-03 05:38:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 182142872 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20224].
Kees 59 (2025-08-03 11:20:09+00:00): Hi, Is the value for memorial:conflict correct? should it not be WW1? §WW1 is not on the wiki and WW1 is.
PèreForez (2025-08-03 11:54:28+00:00): Tout-à-fait exact, juste une malheureuse erreur de frappe. C'est corrigé
Thank you very much
notmyproblem1 (2025-07-06 16:32:37+00:00): Ciao gattatina! Ho visto che nella location del defribillator hai messo "DAE 24/7", dovrebbe essere inserita dove si trova realmente, ad esempio:
defribrillator:location=Vicino al muro giallo 
oppure
defribrillator:location=Appena entri in *Luogo*, 1 metro a sinistra lo trovi
Jacopo (2025-07-08 14:31:06+00:00): Ciao
ho guardato con StreetSide e si vede una colonnina gialla sul marciapiede con il DAE, ho aggiornato di conseguenza
Ciao
J.
NeisBot (2025-07-05 20:45:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-07-18 05:05:46+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/168539262
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-05 02:17:40+00:00): Hello!

You used
building=office_building
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/439823511/history

Have you maybe meant
building=office
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
BCNorwich (2025-07-06 05:34:04+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The tag leisure=park infers a park open to the public for recreation, which I don't think these are. Thus, I've removed those two tags. I've added the tag leisure=dog_park to the POI in the area that looks like the dog park.

Regards Bernard.
notmyproblem1 (2025-07-06 16:36:23+00:00): Hi dear plbnrd! I just see that you mapped the "ENI" as not wikidata Q565594 (https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q565594) I just modified your place, please next time map correctly, Thanks :)
b-jazz (2025-07-06 04:55:12+00:00): RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1412580299

As mentioned in previous changeset comments, your fairways shouldn't be intersecting other golf course features, and you shouldn't be using the lollipop style of mapping (use multipolygons instead). Please see previous changeset comments for links to wiki pages and reach out to me if you need help. Thanks.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-07-05 21:01:13+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2782911155
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/345034794

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
uprkos (2025-07-06 12:26:03+00:00): Adres dodany wg wizji w terenie. W miejscowości jest bałagan z adresami, wysłałem mejla do UG z wnioskiem o wyjaśnienie i poprawienie w PRG.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-07-05 21:01:14+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/865899618

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
MikeN (2025-07-06 00:22:31+00:00): Hi,   Why were the footpaths removed?  They appear to follow the walkway to the house.
perfectstorm007 (2025-07-06 15:48:59+00:00): Hi, I removed them since there was inconsistency with other homes in the neighborhood that did not have them. These were being pulled into trail software as public accessible paths and I figured the homeowners would not appreciate people walking the paths to their homes. It was remove or mark private.
perfectstorm007 (2025-07-06 15:58:22+00:00): I don’t have a strong preference here. I’m fine for them to be rolled back if necessary.
MikeN (2025-07-07 01:54:54+00:00): Thanks for the restore.  Usually I'd be cautious about the private access tag, but in the context of the trails apps, it would make sense to add private to these walkways since they could suggest a network connected by grass for routers.
perfectstorm007 (2025-07-07 12:44:27+00:00): Sure thing! I definitely want to follow best practices. I'm currently working on running/walking every road / trail in Greenville County, so I've been updating roads as I come to them. (Private/Gated, etc). Thanks for the feedback.
Baloo Uriza (2025-07-08 13:56:43+00:00): I'm not sure this is accurate.  The US Postal Service generally requires private letterboxes to be adjacent to the road in rural areas, and this looks like the dead center of a pasture.  Could you please clarify what is going on here?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168539707
bartgron (2025-07-05 22:06:45+00:00): Co to są za szczyty? Szczególnie "wyjebana góra"?
Sieradzkiewsie (2025-07-05 22:46:58+00:00): Witam i wyjaśniam. Jestem autorem blogów: https://sieradzkiewsie.blogspot.com/ i https://toponimiasieradzka.blogspot.com/ Nazwy gór pochodzą najczęściej  z  XIX i XVIII wiecznych map pomiarowych. Mapy nakładam za pomocą qgisa na współczesne mapy, dzięki czemu ustalam ich położenie. Nazwa Wyjebana Góra jest autentyczną nazwą zanotowaną na początku XIX wieku oto źródło: https://toponimiasieradzka.blogspot.com/2022/04/gronow-stolec-1805.html
Sieradzkiewsie (2025-07-05 22:49:21+00:00): Link do oryginalnej mapy: https://www.szukajwarchiwach.gov.pl/en/jednostka/-/jednostka/24671351
Sieradzkiewsie (2025-07-05 22:50:04+00:00): Mam do dodania sporo nazw bazując na starych mapach.
Sieradzkiewsie (2025-07-05 22:50:50+00:00): Czy jest również możliwość dodania nazw rzek i pól, które widniały na starych mapach?
Yukiro (2025-12-21 15:49:10+00:00): Tak, jest: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:old_name
kamilbogacki (2025-12-21 15:51:24+00:00): Usunąłem "Wyjebaną Górę" do czasu wyjaśnienia sytuacji. Nie znalazłem potwierdzenia ani w PRNG ani nigdzie indziej.
Sieradzkiewsie (2025-12-21 19:51:43+00:00): Przecież podałem link do mapy: https://www.szukajwarchiwach.gov.pl/en/jednostka/-/jednostka/24671351 
Nazwa jest na mapie. W PRNG nie znajdziesz takich nazw.
Yukiro (2025-12-21 23:22:49+00:00): "Portlet is currently unavailable", także na razie nic z tym nie zrobimy
Sieradzkiewsie (2025-12-22 00:07:27+00:00): Nie rozumiem
Yukiro (2025-12-22 06:15:27+00:00): Ta mapa jest niedostępna, nie wiem dlaczego
Sieradzkiewsie (2025-12-22 08:59:01+00:00): Podaj adres mail to ci wyśle