piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
grzegorz75jan (2025-02-05 23:59:00+00:00): Wolniej. Czytałem sobie o modelach AI które można sobie dodać do edytora wideo i użyć do zamiany mowy na tekst oraz tłumaczenia na inne języki a tu mi wpada trzy wiadomości z OSM. 

W iD nie edytuję czy nawet nie przeglądam a od jakiegoś czasu są w nim pewne zmiany więc ciężko mi ogarnąć co mógł widzieć ale raczej świeży jest choć pozytywnie komunikatywny. Pomoce naukowe pewnie zauważyłeś, że już dostał. Może nie ucieknie.

Powiedzmy, że ta kobieta to ciekawostka międzynarodowa a czy będzie z tego wojna edycyjna to się zobaczy. W każdym razie nie rozumiem po co robiła jakieś wycofanie (nie wnikałem) ale po wuja usunęła ci faktycznie las. Obrys wysepki jest przecież obszarem i jest relacja po kiego dodała to area.  Aktualnie tylko zerkam na OSM bo nadrabiam inne tematy.

Co tu się odwala ostatnio. Jakieś dziwne akcje edycyjne od dziwadeł. Wierchuszka OSM coś poznikała i zmierza mocno w QGiS-a. Strach się bać.
NickNick1210 (2025-02-25 16:15:59+00:00): Moin,
du scheinst ein paar Fahrtvarianten der Linien im TN5 in eigene Relationen aufgeteilt zu haben. Bspw. ist mir das bei den Fahrten 1542109 und 1542119 der Linie 542 aufgefallen, die ich wenige Monate zuvor zusammen in eine Relation gemappt hatte. Nach dem Wiki-Artikel zu DE:Öffentlicher_Verkehr ist das auch empfohlen. Dort steht: "Eine Fahrtvariante liegt hingegen nicht schon dann vor, wenn eine Linie nur einen Teilabschnitt einer Route befährt, ohne vom Fahrtweg abzuweichen. Es sollte immer der längste zusammenhängende und so befahrene Fahrtweg gemappt werden; dieser deckt automatisch alle kürzeren Varianten mit ab." Oder gibt es da einen bestimmten Grund für, dass du die Fahrten getrennt hast?
VG Nicklas
hybridOL (2025-02-25 16:53:27+00:00): Hi,
da die Fahrten häufig auch mit eigenen Fahrtnummern und vor allem immer unterschiedlichen Start- und Zielhaltestellen und -Zeiten existieren, sind es meiner Meinung nach auch unterschiedliche Objekte. Vor allem die Anschlusstücke morgens und abends sind sicherlich die am wenigsten hilfreichen zusätzlichen Fahrten, aber dennoch nicht sinnvoll im jetzigen Schema abbildbar.
Als ich angefangen bin die Buslinien zu mappen, gab es tatsächlich diese Ergänzung im Wiki noch nicht. Ich halte sie auch für diskutabel, da sie scheinbar ohne Diskussion von einer Person "erfunden" wurde, andere Wikiseiten haben zumindest auch keine entsprechenden Hinweise. Für mich war immer maßgeblich, was für die Erstellung eines Linienplans erforderlich wäre, und da sind diese Routen sonst schlicht nicht erkennbar. Von daher würde ich empfehlen, nur die Routen zu löschen, die nicht im Linienplan verzeichnet sind. Ich kann die Diskussion im Wiki mal anstoßen.
Gruß, Christian
Frans S (2025-02-21 14:17:15+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
You duplicated a track which was already mapped. Check the area carefully to avoid these duplicating mappings.
btw, This is not a 'tertiary road' . It  is just an unclassified road or track. Check your knowledge about tagging highways, please.
Best regards
Frans S (2025-02-21 14:26:47+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
You mapped an already existing track (duplicated) and tagged it as a tertiary road.
This trace is at best an unclassified road or a track.
Check your knowledge about tagging highways here.
Best regards and keep mapping.
eggie (2025-02-05 07:18:37+00:00): Hi... 
warnings:crossing_ways:highway-highway
  	7

I made some connection with the crossing roads 

Greetz,
eggie
user_22460680 (2025-02-05 18:21:07+00:00): Thank you!
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-02-05 18:12:28+00:00): is this import discussed anywhere?

is it documented?

If yes, can you link this in changeset comments or at user page at least?
Janjko (2025-02-05 23:45:17+00:00): Here is the wiki page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Croatia/Import_administrative_borders

Although it isn't finished yet. I wanted to just import a few borders that touch the coastline so that the full import can proceed easier.

I see it was reverted, was it because there was no changeset comments, or did I break the coastline?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-02-06 02:10:10+00:00): given that comment mentions "fix coastline around adriatic sea, revert boundary imports that broke it" without commenting on documentation of import I expect that breaking coastline was cause

Not in DWG so I cannot say what would be the action if lack of docs was sole issues but I expect that there would be first request to explain and link documentation if nay

> Here is the wiki page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Croatia/Import_administrative_borders

oh, great! Can you add it in changeset comments of previous edits or at least on https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Import%20DGU%20borders user page? And link it in future changeset tags (in edit comment or in extra tags, JOSM can easily do this)
yvecai (2025-02-06 11:09:39+00:00): Hello, what about piste:grooming? I guess it's classic;skating on most of the pistes, isn't it ?
Yves
matteo564 (2025-02-06 11:21:33+00:00): Correct, except in rare cases for competitions
Supaplex (2025-02-05 07:22:02+00:00): Hi,

OpenStreetMap is a collaborative project that includes names. The removal of name:zh and name:nan groups are not tolerated. 

Your edits are reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162153359
citrula (2025-02-05 06:55:55+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You need to add tags to these buildings you are drawing. You can do this by selecting the object and searching in the left panel.
dorymoving (2025-02-05 03:16:44+00:00): - Quiropráctica
- Fisioterapia
- Rehabilitación Fisíca
- Masajes Terapeuticos
..............................................

En la aplicación "Organic Maps" encontré esta categoría, eespero que usted puede poner la categoría más adecuada. Dory
Supaplex (2025-02-05 07:22:03+00:00): Hi,

OpenStreetMap is a collaborative project that includes names. The removal of name:zh and name:nan groups are not tolerated. 

Your edits are reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162153359
Frank Peng (2026-01-13 20:42:49+00:00): Same issue as in several of your other changesets. Please do not delete existing roads and redraw them anew. Please just modify the geometry of the existing roads or retag the existing roads. You deleted a few parking aisles and remapped them in this changeset. Doing such things goes against good practice on OSM. You could've just modified the parking aisles you deleted in this changeset by modifying their geometry or tags. Please just modify the existing map elements instead of deleting them and redrawing them from scratch.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history

Also, don't remove map elements you don't need or don't like. It's known that not everything is needed by everyone, but you must not work the other way around and remove map details that someone else added just because you don't need it or you think it's stupid.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_remove_objects_that_you_don't_need_or_like

You should click on this FacilMap link of this changeset and you will see that you deleted a few parking aisles and remapped them from scratch: https://facilmap.org/#q=changeset%20162148689
Supaplex (2025-02-05 07:17:10+00:00): Hi, 

OpenStreetMap is a collaborative project which also includes names. The removal of name:zh and name:nan groups are not tolerated. You edit is reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162153242
mavl (2025-05-13 15:09:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
Frank Peng (2026-01-13 20:55:11+00:00): Please see my comments in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162149265

Please visit the FacilMap link of this changeset and you will see that you deleted a few parking aisles in this changeset and remapped them in your next changeset: https://facilmap.org/#q=changeset%20162148947
rskedgell (2025-02-05 08:53:25+00:00): These streets are not access=private, as this would imply a fully private gated community, which isn't the case here. That would only work if there were a staffed gatehouse, which is somewhat improbable for social housing built in the 1920s.

Setting this blocks pedestrian access, which is incorrect. There are consumers of OSM data for routing other than Amazon's deliver drivers.

I also do not believe that delivery vehicles, taxis and the vehicles of other visitors are excluded from the estate roads.

More appropriate tagging might be access=destination + ownership=private.

Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162156017
vineelaa (2025-02-06 15:46:55+00:00): Apologize for the delayed response and assure you that these are addressed on high priority.
Following our review of the changeset, we can confirm our edits accurately reflect the actual ground conditions. The gate is clearly visible in Bing Streetview, and as per OpenStreetMap documentation https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Dprivate, we appropriately tagged this gated community as 'access:private'. While we currently don't use the tag combination 'access:destination+ownership:private', however if you can provide more context or references for the use of these tags it would help us to look the feasibility to incorporate in our SOPs.
Frank Peng (2026-01-13 20:52:52+00:00): Same issue as in several of your other changesets. Please do not delete existing roads and redraw them anew. Please just modify the geometry of the existing roads or retag the existing roads. You deleted a few parking aisles and remapped them in this changeset. Doing such things goes against good practice on OSM. You could've just modified the parking aisles you deleted in your previous changeset by modifying their geometry or tags. Please just modify the existing map elements instead of deleting them and redrawing them from scratch.
osm.wiki/Keep_the_history
Frank Peng (2026-01-13 20:58:39+00:00): Please look at the FacilMap page of this changeset and you'll see that you deleted a few parking aisles in your previous changeset and remapped them in this changeset: https://facilmap.org/#q=changeset%20162149265
shu0410 (2025-02-05 04:54:21+00:00): 城内已经全部做完了？我靠
monhiko (2025-02-05 14:51:27+00:00): 远未结束捏~不过靖西市域这些都是我负责的，这个不做白不做
JJIglesias (2025-02-05 05:20:43+00:00): Saludos.
No se que estabas tratando de hacer con la avenida Siles y la Avenida Desiderio Rocha. Pero resulto un desastre total.
Por favor si no tienes expeciencia haciendo vias complejas NO LAS TOQUES.
Has montado vias, creado triple vias, has saltado rios y olvidado puentes.
Antes de tocar sistemas complejos te sugiero que leas un poco la Wiki y sobre todo actives las alertas de errores. Estos cambios incompresibles que hicistes crearon mas de 44 errores en la Base de Datos.
Gracias
JJIglesias (2025-02-05 05:22:35+00:00): Por cierto Ni la avenida Siles ni la Rocha son highway=trunk (troncales) pues NO SON PARTE de la Red Vial Fundamental (RVF) asi que deben permanecer como highway=primary
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-06 07:17:51+00:00): Just a test?
Yog Sot (2025-02-05 23:25:12+00:00): maybe ya should rather give an explanation why removing natural=wood was necessary? ;]
grzegorz75jan (2025-02-06 00:27:43+00:00): @unmarecito
Why was area=yes added if the closed line is already an area and there is a multipolygon relation?
NeisBot (2025-02-06 10:34:31+00:00): Hi KORAYREİS, thank you for your contribution to the OSM project.

Over the last days and weeks, you've made at least 40 with minimal or no meaningful comments.

To enhance collaboration, please consider using the comment field to describe your map changes. This helps others understand and follow your adjustments more easily. You can find guidance on good changeset comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 

Thanks!

I've also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
Frank Peng (2026-01-19 23:12:33+00:00): Please just modify the existing roads by adjusting their geometry or changing its tags instead of deleting them and redrawing them anew. For the service road you deleted in this changeset (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/661298784/history), you could've just split the road at the point where the road ends. For the parking aisle you deleted in this changeset (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/661300344/history), you could've just split the way at the point where it intersects with a service road (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/661298783) and retag the section of the parking aisle west of the service road as highway=service.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162150154
Frank Peng (2026-01-19 23:13:22+00:00): To split a way in the iD editor, click on the way, right-click on one of the nodes of the way where you would like to split the way, click on the scissors icon (the Split option), and it splits the way. You can also split a way by clicking on one of the nodes on the way and then pressing X on your keyboard to split the way.

Please see the OSMCha link of this changeset below to see which map elements you added, modified, or deleted (You may have to log in to OSMCha with your OSM account to see it).
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162150154
Frank Peng (2026-01-19 23:24:31+00:00): I was going to put those comments in this changeset discussion in one single comment, and when I clicked on the "Post Comment" button on OSMCha, it was unable to post the comment and an error message popped up saying "It was not possible to post your comment." So I had to put the sections of my long comment into seperate comments so it could post. I don't know if OSMCha has a limit on how long the discussion comments can be, but the OSM website seems to not have a limit on the length of changeset discussion comments. I hope to find that out soon.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162150154
muralito (2025-02-05 19:47:39+00:00): sabes si la estación cerró del todo? o abrio en otro lado? es raro que cierre un negocio de esos...
UYMapper (2025-02-12 07:37:27+00:00): No tengo idea, lo que sé es que por allí en los alrededores no está mas.
En el terreno de la estación ahora hay un edificio en costrucción.
mavl (2025-05-13 15:03:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
NorthCrab_upload (2025-02-05 06:00:42+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nieprawidłowa wartość addr:postcode. Kod pocztowy powinien być formatu XX-XXX, gdzie X oznacza cyfrę.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11241231326

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Taya_S (2025-02-05 08:12:55+00:00): Reverted SEO spam

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162154797
jmarchon (2025-02-06 05:42:25+00:00): Welcome back to OSM!
trigpoint (2025-02-16 08:50:56+00:00): Reverted in changeset 162562034  DWG Revert of SEO spam edits .
Net-net (2025-02-05 19:40:41+00:00): Hallo marcsiegert, könnten Sie bitte die access-Änderung unterlassen. Ihre Beschränkungen sind nicht korrekt, daher werde ich sie zurücksetzen.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-02-10 11:07:29+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
SekeRob (2025-02-05 11:12:54+00:00): Hi,

Actually think that Filo edit should have been reverted as the Adriatic coastline boundary is broken in the Volosko corner in multiple sections, since highlighted in OSM Inspector. Not a week ago I spent hours loading the Adriatic relations to correct it, most time wasted on loading the whole A relation into JOSM memory to verify all was properly closed. Oh will, version 1011 now, mopping with the watertap open.

ciao
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-02-05 11:21:05+00:00): ouch, I should have thought to check for more mistakes there
SekeRob (2025-02-05 14:03:10+00:00): Since I still had the data set from last week, just refreshed that coastline section, then seeing there were border imports along that coastline breaking at least 5 area relation, done by the CS prior to Filo's doing by this account https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Import%20DGU%20borders, few hundred edit, guaranteed success. This is 1 mapper scale above me.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-02-05 18:09:39+00:00): For reference, problematic changeset is https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161916556
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-02-05 18:09:57+00:00): I suspect that https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=161916556 will crash
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-02-05 18:12:49+00:00): That border import also looks suspicious, I posted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162146978 for now
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-02-06 02:11:44+00:00): I see that DWG help arrived! Thanks to DWG, again
Taya_S (2025-02-05 08:12:44+00:00): Reverted SEO spam

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162154789
map per (2025-03-15 08:02:37+00:00): Hallo Regionalentwicklung Oberland KU,

ich hab mir diesen Weg nicht vor Ort angeschaut, sondern hab nur eine grundsätzliche Anmerkung:

Bitte OSM nicht zur Touristenlenkung einsetzen, daher bitte nur Verbote eintragen die auch vor Ort beschildert sind.

Danke und viele Grüße
map per
habi (2025-02-05 07:24:12+00:00): Sorry, falscher Changeset-Kommentar.
Wollte damit Notizen https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4613334, https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4613335 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4613337 erledigen.
tastrax (2025-02-05 10:55:10+00:00): Hi Multi Pass - you might also consider lifecycle tagging for abandoned trails, especially if the signs of the trail are still visible on the ground. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

Cheers - Phil
Multi Pass (2025-02-06 01:27:20+00:00): Hi Phil. The paths are actually missing (at least in the locations I checked). I assume washed away due to floods.
Dimacn (2025-02-05 12:12:52+00:00): Пожалуйста не выдумывайте названия. Придерживайтесь правил OSM - не надо писать в названия объектов их свойства и описание. Для этого есть специальные теги. В данном случае название должно быть пустым. Подробнее - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Названия
Taya_S (2025-02-05 08:12:31+00:00): Reverted SEO spam

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162154783
flohoff (2025-02-05 10:14:18+00:00): Moin,
nur weil ich es gerade lese.

Google StreetView ist Lizenztechnisch _nicht_ freigegeben für OSM und darf nicht genutzt werden. Genausowenig wie Apple oder Microsoft StreetSide.

Wenn kannst du gucken ob es selbstgemachte Bilder bei Mapillary oder Kartaview gibt.

Flo
nurdafur (2025-02-05 09:08:18+00:00): Wow, warst du so schnell vor Ort, um zu prüfen, ob das Fussgängerverbotsschild nicht mehr dort ist? Das Schild hast du aber gar nicht gelöscht. Ich bin verwirrt.
Piagno (2025-02-05 12:47:36+00:00): Hallo nurdafur. Nein ich war nicht vor Ort. So wie ich es verstanden hatte, war der Weg vorhin temporär gesperrt und da wir in osm temporäre Sachen sowieso nicht eintragen, hatte ich foot=no entfernt.
Die Strassenschilder sind mir dabei nicht aufgefallen.
Was meinst du war die (mittlerweile entfernte) Sperrung auf schweizmobil auch der Grund für die Strassenschilder?
Piagno (2025-02-05 12:48:04+00:00): oder eher ein Teil der Massnahmen bezüglich des Ausbau Axenstrasse?
nurdafur (2025-02-05 13:55:50+00:00): Da ich nicht vor Ort war und auch sehr lange nicht sein werde, kann ich das nicht beurteilen. Was ich auf verschieden alten Mapillary-Bildern gesehen habe, ist, dass es dort mehrere Jahre lang ein Schild gibt oder zumindest bis 2023 gab, das @CreCrePL im Jahr 2023 eingetragen hat, zusammen mit weiteren Schildern an dem Weg. Wenn es nun dieses eine Schild nicht mehr gibt, dann wurden wahrscheinlich auch andere Schilder am Weg ersetzt. So müsste das Radwegschild ein paar Meter südlich eventuell durch ein Rad- und Fusswegschild getauscht werden...
Das kann ich aber nicht von meinem Sofa aus erledigen, weil ich eben keine einigermassen aktuelle Daten aus dieser Ecke zur Verfügung habe. Die neuesten Mapillary-Bilder, die es gibt sind von 2023. Wenn du Strava benutzt, was ich nicht tue, dann könntest du dadurch eventuell feststellen, ob in letzter Zeit wieder Menschen dort entlanggelaufen sind. Aber da habe ich keine Ahnung, ob so was geht.
Und deshalb habe ich da diese Notiz geöffnet, mit der Bitte, dass sich das eine Person vor Ort ansieht.
Piagno (2025-02-06 05:53:33+00:00): Reverted mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162192560
Frank Peng (2026-01-19 23:50:08+00:00): What was the purpose of this changeset? It looks like you adjusted an existing parking area and deleted some parking areas, then redrew the entire parking area around IHOP. (I'm not trying to say it's bad. I'm mostly just curious.) 

Also, I can see that you deleted a parking aisle in this changeset (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/202493099/history) and redrew the parking aisle within the parking area. Please don't delete existing roads and redraw them from scratch. Please just modify the geometry or tagging of the existing roads. This helps preserve the history on OSM.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162154785
Frank Peng (2026-01-19 23:52:54+00:00): It's important to not remove map elements that you don't need or don't like. It's known that not everything is needed by everyone, but you should not work the other way around and remove map details that someone else added. The original mapper or previous mappers may have a better insight as to why they're mapped the way they are.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_remove_objects_that_you_don't_need_or_like
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162154785
Frank Peng (2026-01-20 00:01:43+00:00): I was going to put those comments in one single comment, but when I clicked the "Post Comment" button on OSMCha, it was unable to post my long comment and an error message popped up saying "It was not possible to post your comment." So I ended up putting sections of my long comment into seperate comments so it could be posted. It seems like OSMCha has a limit on the length of changeset discussion comments, while the OSM website seems to have no limit on the length of changeset discussion comments. But I don't know and I hope to find that out soon.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162154785
flohoff (2025-02-05 17:45:37+00:00): Hi Joge,
ich habe den changset zufällig gesehen. Bitte Gebäude hier nicht nach dem Luftbild korrigieren. 

Die Meisten Gebäude in OWL/NRW sind aus dem Liegenschaftskataster übernommen was viel genauer ist als das Luftbild. Das Luftbild ist nie 100% an der richtigen Stelle und es kommt zu Parallaxenfehlern etc etc 

Blende dir mal das ALKIS dazu ein. Und für den JOSM gibts auch möglichkeiten die automatisiert als Vektoren aus dem ALKIS des Kreis GT zu übernehmen.

Flo
flohoff (2025-02-05 17:47:18+00:00): Ich habe dafür auch einen Debug Layer - Hier der Vergleich vom ALKIS des Kreis GT gegen OSM:

https://osm.zz.de/dbview/?db=alkisdiff&layer=buildingnotinosm#51.95988,8.24374,16z
Glyphes (2025-03-29 19:00:47+00:00): Hi, I see your map edits but I'm not sure about the meaning of the change " lesSacy-2025-02-05c". Is it the reference for an automatic upload?

I see the source on some objects is set to "Thierry Beuret", is it your own name or the name of an organization?

I think that having a commit name like "adding trees in the region of the Sacy" would be helpful :)