piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Wilmer Osario (2023-01-02 00:12:55+00:00): No, it is not a data import, I draw the borders myself using JOSM with the OpenTopoMap and Maxar layers 😅.

In the case of my country, the official borders follows geographic features visible on aerial images, such as the tops of mountain systems or water bodies such as rivers and lakes, which are easily visible on OpenTopoMap:

-https://i.imgur.com/FrppQEB.png

My process is, draw all the borders of an administrative element, on an empty JOSM layer, and then overlay them with downloaded data to modify each relation towards the new borders. It is a process that takes me several days, or even weeks to complete.

In my country, the borders we currently use in OSM are from an old dataset provided by our main national mapping institution (IGVSB). Almost 10 years ago, the Venezuelan mappers of that time dedicated themselves to importing that data into OSM.

One big problem we've been seeing is that the vast majority of those borders are low-precision, making some OSM future tasks difficult, especially in cities and highly populated areas. So I am making an effort to redraw those limits, based on some official sources:

-https://i.imgur.com/RGMYmO6.png 
-https://i.imgur.com/LAZk2j0.png 
-https://i.imgur.com/1suEh6C.png



These are some of the sources I'm using:

http://www.ine.gov.ve/documentos/AspectosFisicos/DivisionpoliticoTerritorial/pdf/DPTconFinesEstadisticosOperativa2013.pdf

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Maps_of_states_of_Venezuela

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Official_topographic_maps_of_Venezuela
pitscheplatsch (2023-01-02 18:22:49+00:00): Ok, thanks for your answer.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-01-01 14:08:46+00:00): la edición fue revertida, mapeo ficticio
pitscheplatsch (2023-01-01 08:27:28+00:00): Hi, may we know the source of your mapping activity? Thanks.
TheSwavu (2023-01-01 03:04:25+00:00): Due to an Overpass fail I also picked up changes in 105985041 and 105989635. 

Sorry about the giant bbox.
nevw (2023-01-01 12:04:58+00:00): Hi, I have updated the house tags to fit with conventional used in osm. The suburb, state are not needed as the boundaries of these are already mapped as is the residential area. I have mapped the fence lines to describe the shape of the plot.
Talldad (2023-01-01 12:11:09+00:00): Hi and thanks. I'm very new to OSM editing.

Does OSM have a standard layer for property boundaries and addresses?
nevw (2023-01-01 12:30:11+00:00): Osm is not like conventional maps often used in gis in respect to layers. Osm doesn't have separate layers for different categories/themes.
Property boundaries are not normally mapped and such datasets are often not open source. Mappers instead try to map fence lines which are evident on satellite imagery. If the bounds are known or evident on imagery for things such as shopping centres, schools, parks then these are normally mapped but individual housing plots are normally mapped by mapping the fence lines and the buildings and the address tags are usually added to the primary building or on a separate node in the centre of the property if buildings are not mapped. The addresses are often done in bulk by import where data sets become available and it is common to add a separate node for those. In Australia all the state and most suburb or administration boundaries are mapped so it is not necessary to add these to most buildings.
Talldad (2023-01-01 22:53:01+00:00): OK, thanks. Addresses used by local authorities are a matter of public record but are still not open source. An interesting situation.
nevw (2023-01-01 23:44:19+00:00): I guess they don’t need to be open source but do need to be released under a licence that is suitable for osm or obtain explicit permission from the database owner/custodian to use in osm.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import
For mapping businesses, etc it is ok to use the address and contact details listed on their websites.
archpdx (2023-01-05 15:28:30+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Please note that we don't use the name tag to describe features in OSM (see https://wiki.osm.org/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions). Could you please remove the names from the features added in this changeset?
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2023-01-30 17:29:13+00:00): مرحبا بك في خريطة الشارع المفتوحة، نرجوا منكم عدم تغيير أسماء الشوارع وتصنيفها بشكل غير صحيح
sjakobi (2023-02-07 18:00:56+00:00): Hi! Kannst du vielleicht etwas zu diesem Hinweis (https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3549167) beitragen? Dieser Änderungssatz hat dort eine Schneise eingetragen, wo kürzlich noch ein Weg war.
vichada (2023-02-10 19:24:00+00:00): Yes,  That is a cutline that is currently maintained because of the hunting.
sjakobi (2023-02-14 17:20:57+00:00): Thanks. I've added the tag highway=track to the cutline.
vichada (2023-02-18 10:48:38+00:00): If you think it's appropriate (I think it is), please do so. 

If I get questions from the hunter I can refer him to you ;-)
sjakobi (2023-02-18 11:20:04+00:00): Hah, yeah, please refer them to me. :)
MxxCon (2023-01-03 02:03:09+00:00): Hello.
w244163829 address is "1000 U"? and w244178743 address is "1000 T"? These are rather strange addresses. Where is that info coming from?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130738232
user_17724595 (2023-01-05 00:17:20+00:00): All of the buildings in this area have the same address "1000". To tell them apart, they also have a different letter for each building.

On https://www.statenislandmuseum.org/ their address is "1000 Richmond Terrace, Building A", and https://www.sichildrensmuseum.org/ address is "1000 Richmond Terrace, Building M". Most of the others are on the map here: https://snug-harbor.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Sitewide-map-handout.jpg

I wasn't sure where to put the letters, so I first put them as addr:housename="Building A", but then I thought that isn't right. On NYC Buildings site https://a810-bisweb.nyc.gov/bisweb/PropertyProfileOverviewServlet?bin=5113037 it is written like "1000 T RICHMOND TERRACE", so I thought I could put it in addr:housenumber

Now, after reading the wiki https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:addr:* again, I think I should use addr:unit tag, like addr:unit=A or addr:unit="Building A" 

Also, I just found a similar situation in the Brooklyn Navy Yard and the building number is in the name tag: https://www.osm.org/way/483140986
user_17724595 (2023-01-05 00:41:59+00:00): Hello, I am still not sure how to tag this properly, so I removed all addresses that I added in this area. Maybe I will add them back later, but for now I removed them. https://www.osm.org/changeset/130886996
user_17724595 (2023-01-05 00:44:15+00:00): https://osmcha.org/changesets/130886996/
BubbaJuice (2023-01-01 06:12:03+00:00): PADUS used for nature preserve boundaries.
danieldegroot2 (2023-01-02 19:06:12+00:00): Two empty ways:
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1126142325
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1126142338

One abandoned outer member
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1126142318
user_5359 (2023-01-03 07:11:41+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1126142318. what is the meaning of the foreign keys (no OSM keys)?
BubbaJuice (2023-01-03 14:46:56+00:00): Yeah sorry I forgot to remove those and the correct tagging. I'll fix things up today.
gpserror (2024-02-18 02:23:01+00:00): Hi, I had to remove one of the bike paths you put down as it was causing validation problems.  If there's only one asphalt, there should be just one roadway and that roadway should be tagged with cycleway=lane and other tags if it's only on one side.  TBH this would not have been flagged as an error if you didn't overlap the driveable road, so just letting you know how you can improve mapping in the future.
Supaplex030 (2023-01-01 20:02:29+00:00): Hallo geozeisig, ich hatte hier an der in Bau befindlichen Gedenkstätte zum Friedhofslager bewusst "monument" statt "memorial" gewählt, da es sich um eine recht große, begehbare Fläche handeln wird, die insgesamt den Gedenkort bilden wird. Laut Wiki sind die Größe und Begehbarkeit zentrale Kriterien, die für "monument" sprechen. Was spricht deiner Meinung nach eher für "memorial"?

Für optische Eindrücke (leider noch nicht fertiggestellt) siehe auch https://kkbs.de/blog/112054/kirchliche-gedenkstatte-zur-ns-zwangsarbeit-fur-die-kirche-berlin-neukolln-fast-fertig sowie https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Gedenkst%C3%A4tte%20Friedhofslager%20Berlin-Neuk%C3%B6lln%20Baustelle%20November%202022.jpg.
geozeisig (2023-01-02 06:51:42+00:00): Da kannst du natürlich recht haben. Wenn es fertig ist, wird man einen Eindruck bekommen. Es wird nur manchmal "monument" mit verwechselt "memorial" weshalb ich danach gesucht habe.
pitscheplatsch (2023-01-01 08:23:51+00:00): Hi, may we know the source of your mapping actitivty? Thanks.
Trần Thanh Tuấn (2023-01-02 10:03:29+00:00): Hello there,
I drew the subdivisions based on this government-made map: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1q__j-vdY-uhvW18U6oebJEHVwhkILuDl/view.
Regards,
Tuấn.
pitscheplatsch (2023-01-02 18:21:13+00:00): And your utilized map does not has any copyright?
Trần Thanh Tuấn (2023-01-03 03:37:26+00:00): Indeed. This is publicly available to all. Withholding them from the public is an offence.
puma515 (2023-01-01 12:15:14+00:00): Hallo, zur Info: Ich habe diese änderung grade zurückgesetzt. Der Grund ist das du fast ganz Bünzen zur Baustelle gemacht hast. 
Denke mal du wolltest nur das neubaugebiet anpassen aber auch das ist nicht mehr nötig da es seit über 1 Jahr fertig und keine baustelle mehr ist. 
Es fehlen dort nur noch alle Gebäude. Welche ich bei nächster gelegenheit mal vor ort erfassen werde. 
Schön gruß puma515
fx99 (2023-01-01 17:00:13+00:00): Danke fürs Rücksetzen, da war ich wohl noch nicht ganz wach.
Enock4seth (2024-04-13 20:25:01+00:00): Hi. what were you trying to map at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10297858600 
there seem to be several unrelated tags on this node. Can you please clarify?
NorthCrab (2023-01-01 21:22:51+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1126152076
Nie dodawaj zbędnych tagów dostępowych (foot=yes) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Poland
k127 (2023-02-16 02:49:09+00:00): Servus Wolfgang,

bzgl. der Änderung des Knotens „Büchelberg“ [1]:

Hab gerade in dessen Verlauf gesehen, dass das schon ein paar mal hin und her ging mit `place=hamlet` vs. `place=village`. Das will ich nicht gerne fortsetzen.

Vielleicht ist hier die Begründung von Interesse, nämlich, dass meine letzte entsprechende Änderung des Knotens auf der amtlichen bayerischen siedlungsgeographischen Klassifizierung [2] beruhte, wonach gilt:

Einöde: eine Siedlung mit einem oder zwei Wohngebäuden.

Weiler: eine Ansiedlung von drei bis neun Wohngebäuden.

Dorf: einer Ansiedlung ab zehn Wohngebäuden.

Natürlich gibt es auch andere Auslegungen, auf die z.B. das OSM-Wiki hinweist – innerhalb der örtlichen Gemeinde habe ich jedenfalls die oben genannte angewandt.

Für die Zukunft habe ich vor, die Größen von Siedlungen weiterer Gemeinden zu bewerten, und, wenigstens dort, wo es gröbere Abweichungen gibt, an obiges Schema anzupassen.

Wie denkst du darüber?


Beste Grüße
Klaus


[1] <https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6619061817>
[2] vgl. (lt. Wikipedia:Dorf) Entschließung des Bayerischen Staatsministeriums des Innern vom 18. Oktober 1950 (Nr. I B1 - 68a 1)
opendcc (2023-02-16 04:56:29+00:00): Hallo,

osm kennt leider kein besonders feine Abstufung, aber wenn man sich die vorhandene Abstufung ansieht und versucht, in etwa eine vernünftige Gewichtung zwischen einer Siedlung mit 8000 Einwohnern (ist noch 'village') und 25 Menschen (10 Häuser) hinzubringen, dann ist die Kleinsiedlung eher kein Dorf im Sinne von OSM. Typisch unter 100 Bewohner dann 'hamlet'. Ich nehme aber neben der Größe auch Kriterien wie Kirche, Wirt, ev. Dorfladen und besondere Lage mit in die Enscheidung rein.
danieldegroot2 (2023-01-02 17:04:49+00:00): Hey Victor,

You only need to add a lifecycle prefix to the main key (here: highway) in order for it to no longer render on the standard style (Carto). It is also easier to maintain.

Keeping name as name (not old_name or name:YYYY) is fine for no longer existing physical objects. It will also be easier to find for other projects using the data (if they'd like to know it at all).

Sidenote: the name of an abandoned highway, unlike that of an abandoned railway with the tag railway=abandoned, won't be indexed in the standard search (Nominatim).

Regards,

Daniel
VictorIE (2023-01-02 18:03:22+00:00): I hear what you are saying. I was being a bit paranoid in case people removed / overwrote names, especially as some roads might get renamed.

It is unfortunate that some parts of old roads (here and elsewhere) get deleted instead of 'archived', thereby reducing usefulness when people are trying to work out where X road that everyone is talking about is, where X road has demolished.
eggie (2023-01-01 10:12:27+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback..  Fixeme opgelost.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Mannivu (2023-01-02 13:47:44+00:00): Ciao, in questa modifica hai eliminato un monumento ai bersaglieri. È una svista oppure effettivamente il monumento non esiste?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130740773
orthocircular (2023-01-01 23:34:30+00:00): Thanks for your contributions and welcome to Willamette Valley OpenStreetMap! Your changes look fine, with the one exception that I bet Dumbeck Ave has 2 lanes, not 1. The case for lanes=1 is single-lane one-way alleys, turning lanes, onramps, etc, but a normal two-way road with one lane in each direction is lanes=2.

Cheers!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130741209
alyxography (2023-01-01 23:38:19+00:00): I used to live in the area, Dumbeck Avenue is a single lane gravel road.
alyxography (2023-01-01 23:39:22+00:00): Traffic is able to go in a single direction at a time, if there are two oncoming cars one must pull off into a driveway.
orthocircular (2023-01-02 02:43:21+00:00): Oh wow that's crazy! I guess that's the correct tag for that situation then.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130741209
archpdx (2023-01-01 23:15:34+00:00): Quick tip: you can use the hotkey 'q' to square the corners of buildings
alyxography (2023-01-01 23:35:06+00:00): oh, thank you!
eggie (2023-01-01 10:25:57+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback.. Je boom zit nu vast aan de oever..  Weet je zeker dat de boom hier staat.
Wellicht nog species=  en species:nl=.... toevoegen

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-01-01 10:37:55+00:00): note heb ik aangepast naar description=.... .
note is een mededeling voor medemappers. 
Boom losgemaakt van kanaaloever. 
Mapse
eggie
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-01-02 15:57:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 130793535 where the changeset comment is: DWG reverting incorrect CS
Jakka (2023-01-02 08:40:13+00:00): onterechte wegen ? Wegen zijn wegen. info:
* https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property
eggie (2023-01-01 12:40:53+00:00): Tag Henrietta

Bitte keine Adresse und 
Eigenname wie "Ferienhaus" hinzufügen.
Das gehört nicht im OSM.

Es gibt schon adresse-knoten.
Gruss 
eggie
eggie (2023-01-01 12:48:33+00:00): Adresse und Namen Freienhaus, Gartenhau, Schippen  habe ich entfernt. 
Fragen immer willkommen
Gruss
eggie
nevw (2023-01-01 11:47:05+00:00): Hi
the tag name=Private is no needed as it has the tag access=private 
Names are only added to things that are named i.e. a sign
eggie (2023-01-01 12:53:49+00:00): Alle Anfang ist schwer. 

Bitte keine Name benützen wie Gartenhaus, Schuppen, Ferienhaus.

Das ist nicht die Name der Wohnung. 
gr eggie
trial (2023-01-01 13:46:23+00:00): Attention; modification incorrecte (incomplète en fait) pour Le Bono : l'official_name est Le Bono et non plus Bono. Je n'ai pas vérifié les autres.
trial (2023-01-01 13:59:06+00:00): De la même façon, les pages Wikipédia ayant été mise à jour, les liens doivent être actualisés (même s'ils marchent encore en tant qu'indirection).
Concernant Le Bono, "Bono" n'avait pas d'existence sur le terrain, j'ai donc viré du nœud ce faux old_name (préservé dans la relation du fait de la présence de l'official_name) https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/130749298
Vorlod (2023-01-01 15:28:51+00:00): Bonjour, il va effectivement falloir mettre à jour les pages WP. Concernant les anciens noms, je n'ai eu que pour Le Bono où official_name était utilisé, sinon, pour les autres cas, j'ai uniquement déplacé la valeur de name vers old_name, à défaut de trouver une procédure sur le wiki. Merci de votre vigilance.
abakus_uploader (2023-01-01 23:32:42+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
abakus_uploader (2023-01-01 23:32:41+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
DP24PH (2023-01-01 13:55:09+00:00): More information may be raised thru the #OSMPH #papercut_fix ticket 89 as needed: https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/89

DP24
geo ma (2023-01-04 14:06:37+00:00): rigth
alexey_zakharenkov (2023-01-02 16:29:38+00:00): Добрый день!
Нет ли здесь ошибки? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dcarport - это навес для автомобилей. Не понимаю, как он может сочетаться с мусорным контейнером.
user_610278 (2023-01-07 10:13:37+00:00): Это мусорная площадка под контейнеры с навесом. Есть иные теги для подобных?
alexey_zakharenkov (2023-01-07 13:38:37+00:00): amenity=waste_disposal + covered=yes
Glassman (2023-01-02 23:56:58+00:00): #TIP: square building by just selecting the outline then type a "q"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130745154
limes11 (2023-01-15 12:54:33+00:00): Hi, 

ich weiß nicht, ob Deine Intention war, ein Hotel auf der Karte einzutragen, aber das ist schiefgelaufen. Das Hotel ist mitten auf der A8 gelandet. Ich habe es nun wieder entfernt. Vielleicht war das aber auch nur eine persönliche Notiz, die nicht für die Allgemeinheit bestimmt war. 

VG Limes
canfe (2023-01-01 18:40:28+00:00): L'umico building che hai mappato in questo CS non è squadrato.
Usa Q su ID per farlo o su JOSM aggiungi il plugin "buildings" che ti fa fare tante cose in automatico con gli edifici.
Per dubbi chiedi.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130745568
RaphaelPasloin (2023-01-01 13:08:50+00:00): Hello,

The pedestrian zone don't go on the private propriety of former Hostel. Can you fix that please ? 

Also on your changeset description : you don't only added a pedestrian area , you add leisure (that doesn't exist anymore) and modify some building (that's good no problem with that) but please indicate it as it was already requested by other contributor.

Have a good day.
JhowieNitnek (2023-01-22 13:57:48+00:00): Sorry for this will be more careful next time
Glassman (2023-01-02 23:58:46+00:00): If you are feeling energetic, the crosswalk should be tagged as highway=footway, footway=crossing and crossing=marked or crossing=unmarked.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130745931
Langlaeufer (2023-01-01 17:35:30+00:00): Hi, ich hatte die Rad-Fußwege auf der Trennlinie zwischen beiden Wegen erfasst, ich habe den Eindruck, du schiebst die Linie wieder auf die Radwegachse, oder?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130746017
Neko the gamer (2023-01-01 12:39:50+00:00): ma che cazz
dove sono i semafori?
aTarom (2023-01-01 13:41:01+00:00): Hola Jesus David MF,
es este nodo figura
"wayend"="yes"
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10298123350/history
¿se trata de un 
"noexit"="yes"?
Por la imagen aérea no me queda claro si falta for conectar al "sendero del charche" o hay algún tipo de valla o puerta.
Saludos y gracias por editar
@JDMF (2023-01-11 10:01:21+00:00): Así es, fue un error mío, y no me dio ningún problema el validador al poner esa etiqueta errónea, pero ya he visto que "mueschel" ya lo modificó.
Puse dicha etiqueta al no estar seguro de ese punto hasta que vaya a comprobarlo de forma física y confirmar si se conecta a la rambla o no.
Saludos y gracias por tu interés.
canfe (2023-01-01 18:45:09+00:00): Non metterei natural wood per una singola pianta.
Anche perché non è una foresta vergine.
Da noi ci sono solo landuse=forest
Tagga le 2 piante come singole piante natural tree
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130746635
这里没有鱼 (2023-07-19 10:31:57+00:00): 不要添加不存在的测试数据，已回退
Leo Slager (2023-08-31 12:57:19+00:00): Waar haal je vandaan dat er hier fietsstroken met pictogram liggen ?
Op de luchtfoto's is duidelijk te zien dat dat niet zo is.
Het blind invullen van Streetcomplete leidt tot grote fouten op de kaart  !!
Shaun das Schaf (2023-01-01 17:39:03+00:00): Hallo Gurumeditation,

bitte verwende den Namen eines Objekts nur für den tatsächlichen Namen, nicht für eine Beschreibung.
Dass es sich bei diesem Objekt um eine Bank handelt wird bereits durch den Tag "amenity=bench" ersichtlich.

Siehe auch:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen#name_ist_nur_der_Name

Ich habe den Namen der Bank deshalb wieder entfernt.

Viele Grüße
Shaun das Schaf
CorruptComputer (2023-04-21 05:46:52+00:00): Hi, thank you for your contributions in the area. I would just like to ask that you be more careful with your edits, I have had to fix many places where you stretched the grass areas across roadways.

For example: https://i.imgur.com/BCX9jl5.png
eggie (2023-01-01 13:51:12+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-01-01 13:54:52+00:00): Zeker weten dat dit een Chalet is dat je kunt huren en dat het nog een Engelse naam heet Golden place?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-01-01 13:59:01+00:00): Tagging aangepast naar buurthuis.. Engelse naam verwijderd.
MVG
eggie
カメラワーク死んでる (2023-01-01 13:41:43+00:00): GoogleからではなくHPの情報です
RicoElectrico (2023-01-01 23:46:06+00:00): Cześć, dzięki za dodanie AED. Na Złocienieckiej dodałem budynek, na którego ścianie jest AED. Jeśli chcesz, użyj edytora online na openstreetmap.org i dodaj jeszcze jakieś nowe rzeczy do mapy, bo pewnie trochę tam pobudowano :)