piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
igor2 (2025-05-05 14:58:19+00:00): Hello Sakari_N,

I'm trying to trace fences where I see them, give or take. Since I am airmchair mapping only, can't do surveys in Finland, I don't have local knowledge and some details may be off. I do the mapping in hope that it's easier for someone local to do a survey and modify my version than doing the whole thing from scratch.

It's also sort of a drawing aid for me in some cases: houses are often parallel with fences and in turn with streets, and to pick up the base vector I find it easier and more precise to do it from long fences than short walls or street centers that are imaginary; neighboring blocks often have the generic base vectors of fences and walls lined up, and sometimes even property boundaries line up between adjacent blocks. This in turn helps me figuring the extent of some houses especially when they are under trees.

About the details...

Sometimes I see a fence starts at one corner of a property and I see the end of it in another corner but at the resolution of the aerials available here I can't see the fence in the middle along the given edge, but I find it very unlikely that it just missing in the middle, so in those cases I sometimes imply short middle sections. 

Similarly, with building corners under trees I sometimes can't decide whether the building is rectangular with a corner shaded out or has a more complex floorplan; whether a building touches (or even replaces) the fence or there's a tiny gap; or whether two very closely placed buildings share a wall or they are just really close, within a meter. I regard these all limitations of the aerial based mapping.

About fences, I also cant determine whether they are really fences or walls or hedges (or hedge grown over a fence).

Properties fully surrounded with fences: I don't have local knowledge, but I assume most of the cases it's not a big gap in the fence but a small gate, usually put on the node where the driveway crosses the fence. 

(Unfortunately the actual gate is typically not visible on the aerials in this region.) 

If you have alternative sources or local knowledge, please feel free to add the details, remove fence segments that the subpixel shadow on the aeriel made me think is there but is not.


Thanks!
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-05 15:15:16+00:00): > About fences, I also cant determine whether they are really fences or walls or hedges (or hedge grown over a fence).

then map barrier=yes, not barrier=fence (or map something where you are sure that you map correctly, there is no shortage of such places where it is possible, no data is better than wrong data)
igor2 (2025-05-06 03:56:37+00:00): fair enough, I will use barrier=yes
Sakari_N (2025-05-07 18:41:28+00:00): >Similarly, with building corners under trees I sometimes can't decide whether the building is rectangular with a corner shaded out or has a more complex floorplan

You can use the "MML Topographic Map" layer, one of the default layers in iD to trace buildings, so you don't need to guesswork the shapes. Some of the very complex shapes they don't represent well in that data, but for typical buildings I find it quite accurate.

>Properties fully surrounded with fences: I don't have local knowledge, but I assume most of the cases it's not a big gap in the fence but a small gate

Typically in finland (I have not visited the neighbourhoods in Äänekoski), but normally you'll find bush/hedges as fences between properties, sometimes wooden fence and sometimes no fence. Other materials, like masonry also do exist but not very common.

Gates are quite rare. I would say that out of 100 buildings maybe 1-2 would have a gate in the driveway. Also typically houses like these have car-driveable driveway, so that gives you an idea of the minimum gap width too.
igor2 (2025-05-08 03:46:00+00:00): Thanks, I am aware of the MML layers. I found the MML topographic not too accurate in some cases, that's why I decided to go with the ortho.

Btw, is it legal to copy house numbers from the MML base map? 

Thanks for the info on the gates/fences!
Gerd_c (2025-05-01 07:56:21+00:00): Correction: source of change set should have been survey
HirschKauz (2025-05-05 12:48:08+00:00): Hi! kleiner Tipp: wenn ein Laden schließt, dann machen wir [disused:shop=yes] und den [name=XY] machen wir zu [old_name=XY]
Grüße und weiterhin viel Spaß ;-)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165660451
jeslop (2025-05-01 10:36:14+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165669060
monhiko (2025-05-01 06:56:07+00:00): 不用把我名字打出来啦！(/ω＼)
GuGuan123 (2025-05-01 07:16:05+00:00): 抱歉哈...下次注意
czebureks (2025-07-23 14:47:49+00:00): Cześć, 
dzięki za świetne zmikromapowanie tego terenu! :)
Proponuję do miejsc parkingowych wzdłuż ulicy w takich przypadkach dodawać też tag "parking=street_side", co nie tylko jest cenną informacją, lecz również poprawia renderowanie.
Pozdrawiam
MxxCon (2025-05-02 16:35:57+00:00): Hello.
Please note that "W20 Street" is not a valid alternative street name. As documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Abbreviations, street names should not be abbreviated.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165661334
CyberMinion (2025-05-03 01:23:55+00:00): I wasn't sure that counted as an abbreviation. Multiple businesses on that street list their address this way, spelling out "street" but calling it "W20"

But if you think that isn't appropriate, I'm fine with removing it. Anyone searching for addresses on that street, using that naming convention, will get zero results without this alt name, but whatever.
MxxCon (2025-05-03 03:45:33+00:00): The responsibility of translating shorthand like "W20" into a valid street name lies with geocoding services like OSM's Nominatim. Maintaining the accuracy of OSM data is paramount, and we should avoid polluting it with incorrect entries simply to satisfy the limitations of some software. Robust applications will adapt their search functionality to effectively process accurate OSM data and understand user intent.
CyberMinion (2025-05-03 21:24:37+00:00): Alright, fair enough. Removing that is fine, then.
marc__marc (2026-01-26 18:05:22+00:00): Bonjour,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8185551029/history/4#map=19/48.574448/-3.852127
la cadastre donne des informations sur les stations de recharge ? :)
l'intégration est problématique car l'objet d'origine n'a pas le même opérateur que ce que tu ajoutés, la station tesla étant quelques mètres plus à l'ouest

Cordialement,
Marc
mystery2008 (2025-05-24 11:17:18+00:00): Добрый день. Здания следует наносить с использованием категории "здание без конкретного типа". Никакой пещеры тут нет. Ваше описание места следует наносить в специальное поле объекта ("описание"), а не в опиание пакета правок. Я исправил всё за вас, удалив объект и создав такой же с типом "здание" и переписав ваше описание. 
P.S. Я тоже там был, осенью, никого не было. Наносить не стал, тк туристические домики не принято палить во избежание их дестроя.
jeslop (2025-05-01 10:40:12+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165669199
cuzi (2025-05-01 09:16:51+00:00): Hier ist ein neues Wohngebiet, das auf allen Bildern außer "Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta" zu sehen ist. Die Bilder sind hier in der Gegend recht alt, ungefähr 10 Jahre schätze ich. Die anderen Bilder sind neuer, Mapbox ist glaube ich das aktuellste.
Andreas König (2025-05-01 13:09:03+00:00): Hallo, wo genau ist das Wohngebiet (ich kriege mti der Mail nur einen Kasten,d er den ganzen Ort mit Umfeld umfasst.  In Mapbox oder auch Google maps (was anscheindend auch relativ neu ist find ich nix auffällig neues...
cuzi (2025-05-01 17:51:12+00:00): Entschuldigung, ich wollte eigentlich einen Link hinzufügen. Hier ungefähr: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4728054

Ist mir nur aufgefallen, weil ich vor ein paar Wochen dort vorbei gefahren bin und das noch in meinen Notizen steht, aber ich noch nicht dazu gekommen bin es einzutragen.
Andreas König (2025-05-02 05:01:20+00:00): Danka, hab ich ergänzt...
jeslop (2025-05-01 10:40:13+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165669199
domeqasz (2025-05-16 12:39:24+00:00): "błędnej"?
:-} (2025-05-16 12:47:06+00:00): Tak ponieważ nie dość, że service=yard usunąłeś bez powodu, to jeszcze geometrie torów zepsułeś itp.
woodpeck (2025-05-01 08:53:46+00:00): After your edit, this area https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165661865#map=19/19.276776/72.864776 is now without landuse=residential (the map background is white not gray). Is that intentional? It was residential before.
Kingpepe (2025-05-01 09:21:38+00:00): Hi! Thanks for pointing that out. I'm a local to this area and still very new to OSM — it's actually just my third day contributing — so I might have made a mistake without realizing it. When I click on the Sector 9 area in the editor, it does show landuse=residential, so I’m not exactly sure what might be missing.

If there’s something I’ve overlooked or done wrong, I’d really appreciate your help in fixing it. I'm happy to make any changes needed — just let me know!
woodpeck (2025-05-01 11:43:49+00:00): There was a large land-use polygon that covered sectors 8 and 9 before. You have deleted that and instead created a land-use polygon for sector 9 only. Hence sector 8 is now without.
Kingpepe (2025-05-01 11:53:43+00:00): Oh, right. Yeah there was large polygon that covered both sectors together and there are more similar ones. As a local we identify these sectors as seprate areas. Similar to sectors 8 and 9 we have sector 1,2,3,4,5,6,7, poonam sagar, shanti vihar, naya nagar, etc. All of these areas are subparts of the greater mira road(east) region which infact is a part of greater mumbai region. I am sorry if there was any confusion before as there are a lot of mistakes in the area and road markings in this particular region and most apartment building aren't named yet so i was just fixing them in my free time. Thanks for taking out some time to check my edits.👍
Kingpepe (2025-05-01 11:55:19+00:00): And BTW i just redid sector-8 with its own seperate polygon aswell so it might take some time to show on the map
Krystek (2025-05-01 16:05:35+00:00): Wycofałem Twój zestaw zmian i przywróciłem aktualną i obowiązującą nazwę ulicy - ulica Wiosenna. Taka widnieje na Geoportalu i na portalu GIS Miasta Białystok, a także na rozkładach autobusów linii 112 - nazwach przystanków, która tamtędy kursuje - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165682730#map=15/53.09762/23.15305
eggie (2025-05-01 08:35:59+00:00): Dag Robin...  Heeft de kazerne wellicht een naam?  
Het beste kan die worden toegevoegd op de adresnode.


MVG
eggie
jeslop (2025-05-01 10:46:06+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165669449
jeslop (2025-05-01 10:46:07+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165669449
Jofban (2025-06-10 16:27:06+00:00): Hi, laut offizieller Verlautbarung sollte dieses Telekomtelefon nicht mehr funktionieren. Wie hast du das geprüft?

Siehe auch https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/anfang-2023-werden-alle-offentlichen-telefone-der-telekom-in-de-abgeschaltet/4712/211
309_308_307 (2025-06-11 05:35:19+00:00): Hallo, ich hab das Telefon beim Vorbeigehen durch Oberrad gesehen. Es ist augenscheinlich noch voll funktionstüchtig, deshalb hab ich es eingetragen. Tatsächlich versucht, einen Anruf abzusetzen, hab ich allerdings nicht.
FajrAl (2025-05-02 03:53:24+00:00): Halo, berdasarkan citra Sentinel-2 pada tanggal 8 Apr 2025 dan 28 Apr 2025, GITET Lontar di sisi Barat dan Timur PLTU Banten Lontar yang kamu petakan belum ada di lapangan. Ini bukan pertama kalinya kamu mapping objek yang belum ada di lapangan.

Hello, based on Sentinel-2 imagery on the 8th Apr 2025 and 28 Apr 2025, Gitet Lontar on the west and east sides of the Banten Lontar PLTU that you mapped is not existed in the field. This is not the first time you map objects that are not yet in the field.
jeslop (2025-05-01 10:46:08+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165669449
jeslop (2025-05-01 10:47:15+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165669499
jeslop (2025-05-01 10:47:16+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165669499
eggie (2025-05-01 08:32:14+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  De overige bedrijfsgegevens ook verwijderd. Adresnode hersteld.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
dnlvrmr (2025-05-01 09:06:46+00:00): thanks!
jeslop (2025-05-01 10:47:17+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165669499
jeslop (2025-05-01 13:49:40+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165677330
jeslop (2025-05-01 10:54:51+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165669834
jeslop (2025-05-01 10:58:53+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165669989
jeslop (2025-05-01 10:58:54+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165669989
jeslop (2025-05-01 11:02:03+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165670104
jeslop (2025-05-01 11:02:04+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165670104
jeslop (2025-05-01 10:48:33+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165669565
jeslop (2025-05-01 10:48:34+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165669565
jeslop (2025-05-01 10:48:35+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165669565
jeslop (2025-05-01 10:49:06+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165669597
jeslop (2025-05-01 10:49:07+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165669597
jeslop (2025-05-01 10:50:21+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165669637
jeslop (2025-05-01 10:50:22+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165669637
jeslop (2025-05-01 10:50:23+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165669637
user_5359 (2025-05-02 17:29:04+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1382725469. What is the mean of the tag WDPAID = 555570672? Did you mean the key ref:WDPA?
daxro (2025-05-03 02:51:55+00:00): Hi there. Yes, I did mean ref:WDPA. I've corrected the tag. Thanks for letting me know
jeslop (2025-05-01 10:55:31+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165669857
eggie (2025-05-01 09:40:38+00:00): Oke... Ik heb nu wel de tag fire_station van de gebouwomtrek verwijderd..  anders dubbele info.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-05-01 09:03:01+00:00): Dag Bart Je had de regel amenity=charging_station verwijderd en de specificatie laten staan.
Er is hier toch een oplaadpunt voor e bikes?
charging_station heb ik weer toegevoegd. 
MVG
eggie
jeslop (2025-05-01 10:55:57+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165669876
Timmy_Tesseract (2025-06-25 10:23:51+00:00): Good evening and thank you for your awesome contributions around Lake Sebu! 

If a place or object undergoes a name change we can store the previous name in the old_name=* tag. This way the place node would still show up in search results if somebody is searching for Lemlunay.

By the way, some addresses in the area use the old sitio name, should these be updated to addr:place=Sitio Be Afus?
jeslop (2025-05-01 10:56:17+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165669887
jeslop (2025-05-01 10:56:38+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165669892
jeslop (2025-05-01 10:57:00+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165669899
EneaSuper (2025-05-01 08:57:54+00:00): Aggiungo anche di aver fatto più e più volte dei survey!
ArchangelEkim (2025-05-01 09:22:54+00:00): @aharvey please check but I have replaced them most known with ref=. Shame that despite the refs appearing on iD they arent visible on OSM basemap
aharvey (2025-05-01 10:48:45+00:00): Seems reasonable to me.
aharvey (2025-05-09 07:03:43+00:00): https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1422096468142694&focus=photo makes it hard to tell but seems like this driveway might also use 47 and 49 Wicks Road as addresses? If so these could still exist inside the site area being 51 Wicks Road.
ArchangelEkim (2025-05-09 10:51:58+00:00): Yeah I'm not sure where you are seeing those numbers, but I am aware of some cottages on Coxs Rd also using divisions of the 120 address. So you might be right with the one on Wicks Rd as well. Ill have a check though which buildings it actually refers to tho because the DCS geocoding doesn't point to the right spots correctly because the hospital footprint is made up of multiple land parcels.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-14 19:23:18+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7389914151/history has shop = cbd that was added in this edit
shop=cbd ? What kind of shop, if any is here? See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=cannabis - is shop=cannabis intentionally not used here?
redfox_ (2025-08-22 12:55:14+00:00): Dzień dobry !
I used to live in the area, and I added the tag “shop=cbd” because this place doesn't sell cannabis (if you're referring to the drug, in France, it's currently illegal), but rather products made from cannabidiol (aka CBD). I couldn't find a more appropriate tag, but if you have any suggestions, I'm all ears! ;)

Życzę Państwu miłego dnia!
eggie (2025-05-01 10:18:32+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback: Waarom staat het fietspad op access=no Verboden Toegang.
access=no wordt bijna altijd verkeerd gebruikt. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-05-01 10:23:17+00:00): access=no en bicycle=yes verwijderd.
Weet je of het een bronfietspad G12a of een G11 Verplichtfietspad?
eggie (2025-05-01 11:03:27+00:00): Ik heb de routering weer mogelijk gemaakt en fiets en wandelroutes verlegd naar het fietspad.
Verder er voorlopig een G12a fietspad van gemaakt. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-05-01 11:10:57+00:00): Oversteek verplaatst naar werkelijke locatie.
https://viewer.satellietdataportaal.nl/@51.73447,5.552015,19/?datastrip=20250420_SVNEO-02
Mappigator (2025-05-01 18:56:07+00:00): "Weet je of het een bronfietspad G12a of een G11 Verplichtfietspad?"

Dit weet ik eigenlijk niet, zal het van het weekend even nagaan.
eggie (2025-05-01 19:27:32+00:00): Oke Top.. Ik had nu gekeken naar het vervolg aan de westzijde en dat is G12a.. dus voorlopig als bromfietspad getagd... maar even checken lijkt me een goede actie.
Mapse..
Mappigator (2025-05-04 16:24:18+00:00): G12a klopt voor dit fietspad :)
eggie (2025-05-04 17:09:15+00:00): 👍...
user_5359 (2025-05-02 17:33:30+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1160760594. What is the mean of the tag imfo = SN0596 Amazon DBB3? Did you mean info or is this a other notation of the source value ?
Fabian1429 (2025-05-06 19:25:37+00:00): Oh, my mistake. I meant info. Typo.
fortera_au (2025-06-26 09:01:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
bxl-forever (2025-05-01 10:39:11+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM.

The opening hours on https://stores.delhaize.be/fr/delhaize-flagey do not match with what you added to the database.

08:00-13:00 on Wednesdays whereas your edit restricts it to Mondays.

Was this a test edit?
Geolight (2025-05-01 10:53:21+00:00): Thank you, indeed the change was not correct. It should now read well.
bxl-forever (2025-05-01 11:37:01+00:00): Much better now, thanks.

In case you want to edit more opening hours of objects, there is a nice tool to test them before uploading, here:
https://projets.pavie.info/yohours/?oh=08:00-20:00;%20We%2008:00-13:00;%20Fr%2008:00-21:00;%20PH%2008:00-20:00
Langlaeufer (2025-05-05 14:52:10+00:00): concrete:plates ist für eine Brücke eher ungewöhnlich. Normale Gehwegplatten zählen zu paving_stones. An Ort und Stelle gegossener Beton (auch mit Dehnungsfugen) ist concete: Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:surface 
Grüße Langläufer
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165668089
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:57:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:53:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
Sylabowy Kot (2025-05-04 23:28:44+00:00): Przez nieogrodową zieleń chodziło tylko o węzły w sąsiedztwie ogrodów. No ale jak to były takie olbrzymie relacje, to już nie poradzę na wielkość changesetu.
Khidistavi (2025-05-06 19:24:44+00:00): Reverted.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165908511
yrtimiD (2025-05-02 15:16:13+00:00): Welcome to OSM and thank you for contribution!
Just to ensure, is this a simple water tap or a drinking water fountain? 
if the latter - then amenity=drinking_water fits here better
(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Ddrinking_water)
Greg91 (2025-09-01 08:18:26+00:00): Hi! I spotted couple errors in your edits of Tumanyan 2nd pass:
1) "residential street" becomes "living street" only if a special road sign of pedestrian priority is in place. So far we found only 3 such streets in the whole Armenia (in Yerevan). All other "living streets" remaining are not correct mapping.
2) covered, imp, is not correct tag for building passage - redundant, because "covered" is automatic for building passage; afaik, this tag it is used for other cases

PS: I corrected this manially=)
Greg91 (2025-09-01 08:21:32+00:00): Also, the convention established in the chat for roads, leading to apartment blocks, is to prefer just "service road" and not "driveway". I initially also user "driveways", but then got explanation, why driveway is more to individual houses/properties - with less various users
NorthCrab_upload (2025-05-01 11:10:57+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1274503654

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Lezurex (2025-05-01 19:13:30+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/315228125
Ab hier ists ein Fussweg, Velos sind hier nur mit "Velos gestattet" freigegeben. Würde ich daher bei highway=footway belassen. (Wobei, die Signalisation ist hier komplett in die Hose gegangen und widerspricht sich, bspw. ist kurz nach dem Kreisel in Richtung Spitzacker ein reiner Veloweg signalisiert)

https://panoramax.openstreetmap.fr/#s=fp;s2;p5c3a400b-2fc9-40ef-a3bb-8327d40a251a;c318.20/0.64/30;m18.45/47.3852103/8.4213801;bs
https://panoramax.openstreetmap.fr/#s=fp;s2;pa39d64dc-e793-4659-a989-bc317432d995;c214.29/-4.36/30;m17.81/47.387842/8.424113;bs
nleanba (2025-05-01 19:30:33+00:00): Das habe ich übersehen. Dass es in dem Abschnitt nur ein Fussweg ist (und somit keine Benutzungspflicht besteht) macht sinn, da man sonst von süden her nicht wirklich weiter der Birmensdorferstr. folgen kann.

Wo genau ist es als reiner Radweg beschildert? konnte das im Panaromax nicht finden
Lezurex (2025-05-02 07:18:59+00:00): Das wäre das hier: https://panoramax.openstreetmap.fr/#s=fp;s2;pc990170a-c920-48b4-974a-a1b7e421cc79;c131.00/0.00/30;m18.92/47.3858893/8.4209456;bs

Aber eben, das ist eigentlich falsch signalisiert, Fussgänger gibts da ja auch. Velowegsignalisation ist in der Schweiz leider je nach Ort ein Ratespiel... Der Signalisation dort folge ich gar nicht, da muss man zig Male Vortritt gewähren, bis man nach 200m wieder auf die Strasse muss. Völlig idiotisch haha.

Ähnlich siehts auch weiter oben aus: https://panoramax.openstreetmap.fr/#s=fp;s2;pc6169df3-1b8e-4a2f-89c5-8f4f201b9822;c150.00/0.00/30;m18.64/47.3772941/8.4232874;bs