piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Friendly_Ghost (2025-05-14 16:36:24+00:00): reverted the vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166265990
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-06-08 21:54:36+00:00): Unlikely. 
removed.
You'll need a verifiable source for something this disruptive.
elmira_lyft (2025-06-10 14:45:56+00:00): Hi, Spaghetti Monster! 

My name is Elmira, and I’m a mapper in the OSM team at Lyft.

Thanks so much for your feedback on my changeset! We generally implement turn restrictions based on physical signs or road markings. In this particular case, I added the turn restriction because of a barrier and road marking visible in these March images: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1QQ1j2ToQz6QBtHiFAyJOQVBwjJcQPHpx/view?usp=drive_link; https://drive.google.com/file/d/1s_9S71hP6swiyhSd4x955e4B9USeYT4U/view?usp=drive_link.

After further consideration, and recognizing that there's no longer a direct connection from North Gay Street to East Preston Street, I've remodeled the road to better reflect the current situation on the ground. You can see these changes in changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167445288#map=19/39.304874/-76.593177&layers=N.

We really appreciate your comments! If you have any further questions or concerns about these changes, please don't hesitate to let us know.

Best regards, Elmira
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-06-10 22:04:32+00:00): Thank you for this update. I have also downgraded the section of North Gay Street to residential since it's no longer a through road.
Probably there are other class changes in the area that would make sense but I'll leave it for now.
elmira_lyft (2025-06-11 11:33:07+00:00): Hi, Spaghetti Monster! 

Thanks so much for the update and for downgrading that section of North Gay Street – we really appreciate it!

Best regards,
Elmira
jcarlson (2025-06-12 20:00:41+00:00): a number of these buildings were already in the map. please be a little more careful so you don't duplicate features that already exist
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166264590
Herwescheluc (2025-05-14 20:26:53+00:00): Hallo, akino_germany,
das Hereford-Haus ist mMn kein zweites Rathaus, sondern ausschließlich Verwaltungsgebäude der Stadt mit einigen Fachabteilungen. Welche Einrichtung innerhalb des Hauses würde Deine Einstufung begründen? Findet doch sonst alles "politische" in der Innenstadt sein Zuhause und die Chefetage ist auch da.
Würde mich einfach interessieren...
Grüße aus Herborn und
Gute Nacht!
Andreas
akino_germany (2025-05-14 22:22:29+00:00): Das Bürgerbüro und das Standesamt sind im Hereford-Haus, deswegen dachte ich das wäre das Rathaus und Dillenburg nennt das nur anders, ich wusste nicht das es in der Innenstadt ein richtiges Rathaus gibt. Ich habe das korrigiert.
Friendly_Ghost (2025-05-14 16:32:47+00:00): reverted the vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166265834
NorthCrab_upload (2025-05-14 16:31:00+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3621948821
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/429515330

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
kadiwa (2025-05-15 10:09:49+00:00): Die Mall war vorher schon eingetragen: https://osm.org/way/1375079894
Sie besteht schließlich nicht nur aus diesem Gebäude.
Friendly_Ghost (2025-05-14 16:47:23+00:00): reverted the vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166266500
TrickyFoxy (2025-05-15 06:47:34+00:00): Чуть выше уже отмечен. Или есть ещё один?
jb54osm (2025-05-14 17:59:20+00:00): Hi,

Can you tell me why you set the wheelchair key to "no"?
dcapillae (2025-05-14 17:48:41+00:00): Buenas tardes.

Gracias por los cambios.

He hecho unas pequeñas correcciones. Los viales (calles, avenidas, etc.) deben nombrarse usando el nombre completo y sin abreviaturas. Por ejemplo: Calle del Agua, Paseo de los Curas, etc. Más información: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Directrices_de_etiquetado_espa%C3%B1olas#Nombrado_de_v%C3%ADas

Atentamente,
Daniel Capilla
amosharper (2025-05-15 12:05:06+00:00): Hello - thanks for your edit. I can see you've added businesses in several countries across Europe. In future, please try to limit your changesets to small geographical areas to avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers. Thanks!

Guidance here: https://osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
Friendly_Ghost (2025-05-14 21:01:11+00:00): Reverted spam

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166277100
dónal (2025-05-28 21:36:00+00:00): Hi Steven! Thanks for map edits. Can you explain a little more about the issue with this building? If I understand correctly, what appears as one building on satellite is actually multiple units with different names. Is that accurate? If so, we can help update the map data to accurately reflect the reality on the ground (our guiding principle).

Please note that OSM data consumers update their datasets at a frequency of their choosing so any updates could take days, weeks, even months to be reflected in their systems.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166267843
StevenOBrien (2025-05-28 21:47:55+00:00): Thanks! As it's shown now (after my edits), it's accurate.

It's technically one building, but it's a semi-detached house. Older maps reflect this properly (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/images/7/72/OS_1904-1951-_Clonmel.png), but newer maps either show it as one single property or show it as two but only label the entire area "Greenpark" without making the distinction.

The mapping data for this whole area wrt house names is very poor for some reason (this isn't a problem limited to OSM by any means).
dónal (2025-05-28 23:20:10+00:00): Naming things is hard... Describing access to named things also hard.

With permission, it would definitely be interesting to survey the area to understand the history of these buildings and how they ended up with separate entrances, etc.

Amazon have put a lot of effort into accurately deciphering map data to determine the correct routing for their delivery teams. Cases like this are hard to both capture good data for (and decipher algorithmically).
dónal (2025-05-28 23:22:06+00:00): I suspect an additional hint would be to add main entrance nodes on the outlines so algorithms can select the right access route to the entrance of the building (a common issue in these cases).
StevenOBrien (2025-05-29 21:26:22+00:00): Yeah, I can give a bit of history if you like:

When the Gashouse bridge was built around the 1820s, the area known now as the Coleville Road now (then known as Fairy Hill) became an attractive area for the wealthy "middle class" (the owners of the mills, lawyers, minor gentry), because it was an isolated, private area, but still only a very short walk from the town.

The Quakers in particular bought up a lot of the farmland in the area, built luxury villas and either sold or let them out. The first of these was Merlin (which is still a detached house) in the 1820s, and then Springfield (now Springfield/Fairy Hill), Greenville (now Parkminster/Greenpark), Roseville, Ashbourne, etc. followed in the years after.

My understanding is that, in the decades after independence, a lot of that class would have left the country, so it became much more difficult to sell these larger houses. To remedy this, they were split up into semi-detached houses, with interior doorways being blocked off to separate the two sides, tall trees being planted across the garden to create a new boundary, a separate driveway being cut in for the other side (or I think in Fairy Hill's case, it's a repurposed archway), larger rooms being divided with really flimsy plaster/lathe walls to create more bedrooms, then later, small extensions were built on, etc.

Parkminster/Greenpark received this treatment, as well as Fairy Hill/Springfield across the road (which was also previously one single house). I don't know how widespread this practice would have been across the country, but I imagine it would have been a common enough problem.
StevenOBrien (2025-05-29 21:30:59+00:00): And I should maybe just clarify, because I think it gets a bit confusing: They are effectively truly semi-detached houses. If you lived in Parkminster, for example, you could go for years being completely unaware of the people who lived in Greenpark and having no interaction with them.

Even the internal walls in these houses are 2' thick sandstone walls, so it's ideal for that.
Friendly_Ghost (2025-05-14 21:00:26+00:00): Reverted spam

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166277073
silversurfer83 (2025-05-14 19:44:34+00:00): Hi :)

as pointed out in https://osm.org/changeset/157643370 I'd still like you to write proper CS-comments.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166268446
iandees (2025-05-14 20:05:35+00:00): Heya, thanks for making improvements. Can you please use more specific changeset messages? Even something like "added sidewalks" here would have been really helpful.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166268458
Friendly_Ghost (2025-05-14 17:38:34+00:00): Hi. Please provide a meaningful changeset comment. Thank you.
^_^ (2025-05-14 17:58:43+00:00): Hi! I am delete spam names from houses, and change wrong geometry of buildings
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-14 18:14:12+00:00): you must provide meaningful changeset comments also in future edits
StC (2025-07-03 13:01:43+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changeset a cassé la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre qui passe par là. Cause : prolongement d'un chemin au-delà de son point de jonction avec un autre chemin de l'itinéraire.
Je m'occupe de la réparation.
Crys64 (2025-07-03 14:48:48+00:00): Bonjour,
merci pour la réparation des raccords, j'ai dû aller trop vite dans l'édition du tracé.
Etant passé par là plus d'une centaine de fois, j'ai voulu ici ajuster la forme et le nombre de lacets de cette portion.
Je suis preneur de tout commentaire...
Friendly_Ghost (2025-05-14 20:28:45+00:00): Reverted spam

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166276113
Friendly_Ghost (2025-05-14 20:27:35+00:00): Reverted spam

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166276060
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-26 11:42:09+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1363511710/history - skąd ta nazwa?

Jesteś pewien że coś nazywane kanałem jest rzeką?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-26 07:57:38+00:00): reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410  and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969  remain not answered

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173782422
Gregory Peony (2025-05-17 01:26:10+00:00): All footprints added are valid. Please modify features you can identify instead of deleting them and redrawing. --- Highways should not share nodes with buildings. See the mapping guide of this project (link in instructions) to see how to resolve this.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166269624
GrabSG_JasonL (2025-05-19 01:51:31+00:00): Dear DeepScanBot,
May I know what the source is that you are using to realign the roads? For example, the junction configuration is wrong, and unnecessary alignment is performed near https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=22/1.3503836226915404/103.69942782203739. 

You made other wrong changes on the oneway highway by reversing the direction of the highway and deleting the highway segment unnecessarily (way/527683840). Your edit left untagged nods (node/6056618577).

Please go through the policy regarding the https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct. 

It is also not listed in the https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bot or https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Automated_edits_log.
Please follow the OpenStreetMap Editing guideline and respect others edits. As your edits are very large and mix of multi-features edit as same time in a single changeset, if something goes wrong, it would be very hard to revert.

Best,
Jason
OSMCowboy (2025-05-14 18:09:38+00:00): Correction: Source used was Strava.
Friendly_Ghost (2025-05-14 20:47:22+00:00): Reverted spam

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166276655
Taya_S (2025-05-14 18:06:06+00:00): Hello ^_^,

please stop 'fixing' this data. This is part of an ongoing undiscussed import and will almost certainly all need to be deleted later. Other users interfering makes this process more difficult.

Best regards,
Taya Snijder, on behalf of the OSMF Data Working Group
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-14 18:13:07+00:00): I PMed them
^_^ (2025-05-14 18:19:26+00:00): ok
scarapella (2026-07-28 06:44:32+00:00): Hi zystef,

Thanks for your contributions to openstreetmap.  It is great to find other people mapping canoe features.

Purely FYI, I updated one of the portages you created on the Flambeau River https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186500074 with a canoe=no restriction on the waterway=river as it crosses the dam. That let's routing engines (e.g. on https://paddlemap.net/) know to send canoeist to the portage and not over the dam. 

Cheers,
scarapella
Fizzie-DWG (2025-05-30 05:18:32+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166952193
PuertoPudel (2025-05-15 19:55:53+00:00): Разве Ozon в этом месте находится? Тут Барыбинская библиотека, так же администрация. Ozon я переместил возле рынка.
PuertoPudel (2025-05-15 19:56:37+00:00): А нет! ошибся. Тут вообще рядом больница.
PuertoPudel (2025-05-15 19:59:40+00:00): Приношу свои извинения. Ozon тут вообще не находится
woodpeck (2025-05-14 21:02:49+00:00): Hello ^_^, it would be good if you could fill out the "changeset comment" field so that other mappers know what you are doing!
Dodko (2025-05-16 12:47:09+00:00): Dobré je prevádzam pridať aj otvárací čas, pomôcka je https://projets.pavie.info/yohours/
SpinOff (2025-05-14 19:32:12+00:00): Hej. Fragment przy Bema jest ciągiem pieszo-rowerowym. Takie fragmenty oznacza się jedną linią z odpowiednimi tagami. Możesz podejrzeć jak to poprawiłem.

Tutaj jest szerszy artykuł: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Rowery#Drogi_dla_pieszych_i_rower%C3%B3w
Geo-Tobi (2025-05-14 18:53:25+00:00): Gerne auch das traffic_sign Tag hinzufügen, dann ist's einwandfrei nachvollziehbar und glasklar, welche Beschilderung vor Ort zu finden ist. Vielen Dank
Zooma46 (2025-05-14 19:29:03+00:00): Hinzugefügt in 166273471. Am Nordwestende ist kein Schild zu finden, also gehe ich davon aus, dass der ganze Weg einbezogen ist.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-05-30 05:43:01+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166952864
stasiu512 (2025-05-15 09:18:51+00:00): Cześć, jakie jest źródło edycji? Mapa ZTM pokazuje stan poprzedni - https://mapa.ztm.gda.pl/. Teraz przystanek 10 jest zduplikowany, dwie wiaty do jednego numeru nie oznaczają dwóch highway=bus_stop. W dodatku pozmieniałeś numery przystanków a relacji już nie i np. te co odjeżdżały z przystanku 18 odjeżdżają z 14 co się nie zgadza z rozkładami.
stasiu512 (2025-05-15 09:23:12+00:00): tutaj dorzucam schemat odjazdów linii z przystanków https://download.cloudgdansk.pl/ztm-pl/d/2025032611/wezel.pdf
stasiu512 (2025-05-15 12:08:31+00:00): poprawiłem tutaj: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166301082
kukułka (2025-05-15 17:14:18+00:00): Cześć
Nie poczekałeś nawet na odpowiedź znowu zmieniłeś. Źródłem była wizyta w terenie. Jeżeli czegoś nie widać z ortofotomapy, to sprawdzenie w terenie jest najlepsze.  Już to kiedyś pisałem. Chciałem poprawić lokalizacje przystanków i małej architektury, bo teraz jest wszystko źle. Przykładowo, tam gdzie teraz jest zaznaczony przystanek 18 to był kiedyś przystanek, teraz jest przesunięty w stronę pn. Stojąc tyłem do wejścia głównego dworca po lewej masz  2 przystanki - podwójny 10 i 12. 12 nie jest po prawej. Podwójne highway=bus_stop na 10, które zrobiłem chciałem poprawić dzisiaj, po sprawdzeniu paru detali, bo często bywam w tym miejscu. Jeżeli to zmieniłeś to proszę Cię o poprawienie lokalizacji przystanków, która w sumie jest łatwa do ustalenia, a elementy takie jak biletomat kosze względem ich.
pozdrawiam
stasiu512 (2025-05-15 17:43:57+00:00): Proszę nie oceniaj wszystkiego tak pochopnie, zmieniłem to co było błędne, a miejsca przystanków ustawiłem w prawie takie same jak ty  a nie wiatę dalej - z wyjątkiem przystanku 10 gdzie ustawiłem go pomiędzy dwoma wiatami aby nie było duplikacji. a miejsca śmietników i biletomatu są w praktycznie identycznych miejscach co ty ustawiłeś na pewno nie wiatę dalej, jedyną różnicą w tej zmianie jest jeden przystanek 10 i naprawienie błędu z relacjami.
stasiu512 (2025-05-15 17:51:44+00:00): Jeśli jednak te miejsca są inne niż poprawiłeś wcześniej i chcesz je zmienić to przestaw je przesuwając je a nie zmieniając nazwy
kukułka (2025-05-15 18:14:21+00:00): Ok, dziękuję
HirschKauz (2025-05-15 08:01:07+00:00): Hi
Ein Dach ist kein shop=* 
Der shop (Kiosk) ist unter dem Dach schon als building gemappt. Da aber keine 2 buildings übereinander sein können hatte das Dach sein layer=1
Ich habe es zurück gesetzt. (CS 166290447)
Grüße
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166272119
HirschKauz (2025-05-15 08:03:09+00:00): Und noch etwas Lektüre ;-)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166272119
Friendly_Ghost (2025-05-14 20:29:53+00:00): Reverted spam

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166276154
woodpeck (2025-05-14 18:55:50+00:00): Dear EGYYYY2, in this changeset you performed a very welcome cleanup of spam. If you do that, please put something in the changeset comment ("removing spam nodes" or so) - don't just write "." and let others guess what this was about!
silversurfer83 (2025-05-14 19:37:58+00:00): Dear DracarysX,

there are two things I'd like to point out:

- you added houses in Scandinavia so please use the local language or english in your changeset comment as a courtesy to the people doing QA-work in that region.

- here's a neat shortcut for making nice buildings: after adding the tags hit the "Q" on your keyboard to square all the angles. Makes them look much better (only do this with objects that contain only right angles).

happy mapping
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166272672
DracarysX (2025-05-14 20:08:20+00:00): Hi Silversurfer,

Thank you! I‘m still in rookie-mode. I added via iPad and Go Map, that is unfortunately the problem. I will fix this via Browser. 

Maik
silversurfer83 (2025-05-14 20:14:14+00:00): Hi Maik,

nothing wrong with being a rookie. We all were or still are. Depends on the topic :)

I believe that Go Map also has the squaring feature. But since I'm on android and linux I can't check that quickly.

safe travels
silversurfer83
Friendly_Ghost (2025-05-14 20:46:11+00:00): Reverted spam

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166276618
rempshaener (2025-05-14 20:24:37+00:00): Hallo,
ich möchte einige Hinweise zu den Hydranten los werden:

Fehlendes Schild:
Das bildet man am besten über
fire_hydrant:diameter:signed=no
ref:signed=no
ab. Dann ist implizit klar, dass kein Schild vorhanden ist.

fire_hydrant:pressure=yes
ist bei Unter- und Überflurhydranten überflüssig

Württemberger Schachthydrant:
Das wird über
fire_hydrant:style=wsh
abgebildet.

Vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag.

Viele Grüße
schumi1234 (2025-05-14 20:48:27+00:00): Hallo 
Danke für die Hinweise - nach ca. 600 Hydranten. Für die restlichen in Fellbach weiß ich nun bescheid.
Habe ich die Möglichkeit das der Massenedit umzusetzen? z.B. JOSM
Nicht das ich alle einzeln bearbeiten darf 
Viele Grüße
rempshaener (2025-05-15 15:11:23+00:00): Hallo,

sorry, ich gucke eher stichprobenmäßig drüber und habe es jetzt erst gesehen :-(

Das ist aber schnell korrigiert.

Württemberger Schachthydrant
https://overpass-turbo.eu/?Q=%5Bout%3Axml%5D%5Btimeout%3A100%5D%3B%0Aarea%5Bname%3DDeutschland%5D%3B%0Anode%5B%22emergency%22%3D%22fire_hydrant%22%5D%5Bdescription%3D%22W%C3%BCrttemberger%22%5D%28user%3Aschumi1234%29%28area%29%3B%0A%28._%3B%3E%3B%29%3B%0Aout%20meta%3B&C=48.832605%3B9.27083%3B14&R=

fire_hydrant:pressure=yes
https://overpass-turbo.eu/?Q=%5Bout%3Axml%5D%5Btimeout%3A100%5D%3B%0Aarea%5Bname%3DDeutschland%5D%3B%0Anode%5B%22emergency%22%3D%22fire_hydrant%22%5D%5B%22fire_hydrant%3Apressure%22%3Dyes%5D%28user%3Aschumi1234%29%28area%29%3B%0A%28._%3B%3E%3B%29%3B%0Aout%20meta%3B&C=48.832605%3B9.27083%3B14&R=

Kein Schild
https://overpass-turbo.eu/?Q=%5Bout%3Axml%5D%5Btimeout%3A100%5D%3B%0Aarea%5Bname%3DDeutschland%5D%3B%0Anode%5B%22emergency%22%3D%22fire_hydrant%22%5D%5Bnote%3D%22Kein%20Schild%22%5D%28user%3Aschumi1234%29%28area%29%3B%0A%28._%3B%3E%3B%29%3B%0Aout%20meta%3B&C=48.832605%3B9.27083%3B14&R= 

Jeweils nach JOSM exportieren, alle markieren (Strg + A), bearbeiten und wieder hochladen.
Das insgesamt die 3x – fertig.

Wenn du Hilfe benötigst: einfach melden.

Viele Grüße
theDM (2025-08-06 22:00:54+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1386676492
Masz jakieś źródło, że to mają budować?
Friendly_Ghost (2025-05-14 20:45:44+00:00): Reverted spam

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166276605
A67-A67 (2025-05-20 20:36:04+00:00): Hi,
Could you please not change building outlines in the Netherlands? Those are imported from the national government database and are correctly measured at ground level. Imagery can be misleading, because the roofs aren't always exactly above the ground level outline. Especially in urban areas or when the satellite wasn't exactly above the building.
iandees (2025-05-14 20:01:59+00:00): Hey, was there some specific change you were trying to revert here? A lot of the data you reverted looks to be correct
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166273637
Kabooshki (2025-05-14 21:21:28+00:00): yes, the lyft employee had split a 1-block section of Hennepin into a divided highway, which does not reflect real-world conditions and is not in line with tagging guidelines. there were ~4 other changes I made to fully revert it, and not all of them show up on this changeset
relevant changesets are: #166273775, #166273637, #166273487, and #166273344.
Rewinteer (2025-05-20 11:59:43+00:00): Sorry, and why do you think that the separated roads don't fit there? As far as I can see in the photos provided by Lyft in the #163861281 changeset comments, there is definitely a concrete median, and the divided road better reflects the reality on the ground. IDK if there were other errors made by Lyft, but I'd say it would be better to fix those rather than merge the roads again and introduce possible routing issues with left turns to adjacent minor driveways (like w163861281)
Friendly_Ghost (2025-05-14 20:43:12+00:00): Reverted spam

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166276532
Joske1020 (2026-06-14 10:19:38+00:00): castle has weird proportions now. Are you sure that the building has those dimensions?
joost schouppe (2026-06-14 15:20:45+00:00): Yes, reasonably certain - the only nuance is that the shape is of the entire site, so basically the outline of the old ramparts. One could argue that only the old buildings are really castle. But I dont think you can really make out the shape of the ruined building itself. The hillshade map may help to understand the site
Joske1020 (2026-07-17 12:26:07+00:00): en zou je het dan niet beter hebben gedaan zoals de abdij van orval is gekarteerd?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1050969813
joost schouppe (2026-07-17 12:49:48+00:00): Ik snap niet goed wat je bedoelt...