piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
PerrotinLondon (2025-11-28 09:55:00+00:00): Hello, 
Yes I would be very grateful for any help. 
The gallery is underneath Claridges Art Space Cafe. I have dropped a pin which maybe is more helpful. Access is from the main road through Art Space Cafe.
CanopyFalls (2025-11-28 23:01:28+00:00): Cool cool, I've deleted the old area at the moment as now that there's a POI it should mean you're searchable on all the OSM based map applications. You can always upgrade to an area again in the future.

From here I'd recommend adding more tag info to the point you've dropped. Access information is particularly important to add to the map but here are some suggestions for tags you could add:

addr:country=GB, addr:housenumber=*, fee=no, contact:phone=*, contact:email=*, wheelchair=*, amenity=toilets, toilets:wheelchair=*, shop=gift, internet_access=wlan, description=*, ref:wikidata=*

I might also suggest collecting street level imagery through Mapillary or Karta View of the surrounding area as then other mappers will be able to map the location more accurately and support you with mapping.

Best of luck!
Rogoyski (2025-11-27 23:00:51+00:00): Adres nie zgadza się z podaną stroną internetową. Wątpliwe, by iluzjonista miał w tym miejscu biuro.
bartgron (2025-11-28 10:08:04+00:00): Jak dla mnie jak nie odpisze to do wycofania to będzie
divaddivag (2025-11-27 17:41:16+00:00): Bonsoir solcarlus5, pourquoi mettez-vous ces routes départementales en primary? On en avait discuté ici: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142433196 . C'est une distinction propre au département, inapplicable ailleurs qui concernent certains tronçons à prioriser en cas d'événement hivernal exceptionnel. À défaut de revenir en arrière, pouvez vous mettre cela en pause afin d'en discuter sur le forum. Bien à vous. David
solcarlus5 (2025-11-28 12:55:33+00:00): C'est un critère objectif comme un autre. Sur quoi vous basez vous pour décider que telle départementale est une route principale et telle autre secondaire ? Dans le secteur du port de Caen, c'est peu pertinent de mettre la RD 402 en secondaire alors qu'elle est dans le prolongement de la RD403 et permet de rejoindre la route de Ouistreham. C'est donc un maillon important du réseau.
divaddivag (2025-12-01 09:39:41+00:00): Bonjour, Je me base sur le consensus en France (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Cartographie_des_routes_en_France) et à l'international (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Highway:International_equivalence). Le type de highway seul ne permet pas de décrire tous les éléments que vous mettez en avant car ils font appel à des données externes comme le traffic, la densité de population ou une analyse topologique du réseau routier. C'est le cas du secteur Ranville/Bénouville. Le département a établi pour ses besoins une classification plus fine de son réseau qui en en l'état n'est pas généralisable ailleurs en France ou à l'étranger. Je me trompe peut-être c'est pour cela que je vous invite à en parler sur le forum avant de vous lancer dans des éditions à plus grande échelle. Bonne journée.
David
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-29 07:04:05+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1264650747/history change was bogus AND not discussed

degrading highway=primary access to motorway to highway=secondary makes no sense, and requires discussion on forum
aTarom (2025-11-28 09:06:56+00:00): Hols, se ha eliminado la way pero no sus nodos, retiro los que han quedado huérfanos en
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175228586
Hugoren Martinako (2025-11-28 09:17:34+00:00): Cierto, usé el editor Level0 por probar... pero no era tan simple. Gracias.
Frans S (2025-12-05 13:50:26+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
Issues found on your mappings

A: Inaccurate mapping. 

B: Overlapping buildings.

C: Collected adjacent buildings and mapped it as 1 building.

D: Connecting nodes to other features.

E: Buildings not squared or rounded.
G: Included the shadow of the building.


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175206828
eggie (2025-11-27 17:27:00+00:00): reverted by changeset #175208256
eggie (2025-11-27 17:30:21+00:00): Je kunt het beste even vragen of Jeroen van de Gun even wil meekijken.
Die is het meest bezig met dit soort inframappen (hier ook ) en kan de logica uitleggen waarom iets getagd als het is.
Het zit vol met addertjes. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/JeroenvanderGun

MVG
eggie
Frans S (2025-11-28 11:28:20+00:00): Here you connected nodes of buildings to a residential landuse borderline. Move that line to a place where it does not cross buildings.
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175207780
Frans S (2025-11-28 11:48:26+00:00): Hello. 
You mapped a building with a gabled roof along the visible roofline. However, the imagery shows a building from an angle, so the roof seems to  not have a rectangular form. Just map them as a rectangular building.
Check this webpage.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1454215161/history
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175207949
habi (2025-11-27 17:24:53+00:00): Wegen https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5070136 :)
Frans S (2025-11-28 11:19:47+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175208089
Frans S (2025-11-28 11:16:02+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped them. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Please do not include a shadow of the building.
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175208144
Frans S (2025-11-28 11:16:28+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped them. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Please do not include a shadow of the building.
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175208144
kitsis (2026-02-24 18:26:07+00:00): Hi!
Just wondering. among other things in this changeset, you moved a bus stop in oaxaca city by a very small amount, yet given by the areas you are editing around the time, it seems very unlikely you were actually here to verify the position.

You also changed a bus stop to a bus station, where no bus station actually exists. I am currently attempting to map the entire new BinniBus network in Oaxaca. Thanks for editing, but please don't edit where you don't have local knowledge.
kitsis (2026-02-24 18:36:51+00:00): On second thoughts, looking further at your edits, it seems you maybe passed through. Thanks for moving the bus stops by a metre or so if that is more accurate. 
I suppose the interpretation of a bus stop or a station (terminus) is open, but in this case i'd say it is a bus_stop. there's no station infra, but I don't want to get into edit wars. :-)
antonio000 (2026-02-24 18:42:31+00:00): Hello kitsis, I was on vacation last November in Oaxaca, I was riding on a bus when it stopped and confirmed visually there was a bus stop sign there. The accuracy is what my phone GPS is giving me, besides any mistake I could have done. I don't mind if you revert my edits, will not go into a edit war by any means. If still you need some additional prove, check my ebird trip report: https://ebird.org/tripreport/433779
kitsis (2026-02-24 21:43:28+00:00): Hi! 

 I don't think the to the metre accuracy for bus stop positions is terribly important. I'm certainly not going to walk all the routes with a GPS to pinpoint them. :-)
 
But whether a bus stopping position has public_transport=platform as opposed to station (with or without amenity=bus_station) seems to make a difference to map rendering and also to public transport route calculation in such as OsmAnd. 

I might be wrong, but it seems that public_transport=platform really is required for anywhere you might get on or off a bus. 

Also, even as the docs suggest a "bus station" might be a terminus of multiple routes, I don't think that lone bus stop pole by the roundabout counts as a bus station, even if the binnibus people decided to call it a "base".
Thanks for getting back!
Frans S (2025-11-28 11:39:44+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
A: Inaccurate mapping. 
D: Connecting nodes to other features.
E: Buildings not squared or rounded.
G: Included the shadow of the building.


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175208453
Frans S (2025-11-28 11:40:46+00:00): When you see that a borderline of the residential are crosses buildings, move that line just outside the build area.
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175208453
Frans S (2025-11-28 11:24:19+00:00): Hello. See my previous comments on a changeset.
Another issue. You regularly include the shadow of a building. These are no part of the building !
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175208554
rene78 (2025-11-28 08:30:07+00:00): 👍
Frans S (2025-11-28 11:33:10+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 
However, Follow the roof line precisely, even where a roof recesses or there is an extension.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175208779
Frans S (2025-11-28 11:21:49+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------

A: Inaccurate mapping. 
C: Collected adjacent buildings and mapped it as 1 building.
D: Connecting nodes to other features.
E: Buildings not squared or rounded.

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175208784
Frans S (2025-11-28 11:17:51+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175208787
TrickyFoxy (2025-12-20 21:31:06+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176197391
mga_geo (2025-12-07 07:56:54+00:00): Bonjour,
En faisant ces corrections vous cassez beaucoup de relations route=bus r7091938,r4756597,r7105141,r2651174,r4294766,r12255744,r12255745
Pouvez-vous corriger ?
Marc
Carto'Cité (2025-12-07 14:24:27+00:00): Bonjoue Marc,
Je vais regarder ça.
Charles de Carto’Cité
mga_geo (2025-12-15 06:44:03+00:00): Bonjour Charles,
Vous n'avez pas oublié ?
Marc
Carto'Cité (2025-12-15 09:03:54+00:00): Mince,
Je vois que mon commentaire n'est pas passé. J'avais répondu pour te demander quel outil tu utilises pour évoqué le cassage. J'ai regardé dans JOSM les premières que tu évoques et je n'ai rien vu de cassé au niveau de ma correction.
Aussi as-tu vu la correction et en quoi elle serait fausse ?
On en discute.
Charles
mga_geo (2025-12-15 10:53:41+00:00): J'utilise OSMOSE sur la région Bretagne et PTNA pour certains réseaux.
Pour la première relation mon JOSM détecte bien les cassures: https://i.imgur.com/oda0W2t.png
Carto'Cité (2025-12-15 12:53:51+00:00): Oui d'accord j'avais vu ces ruptures. Je pensais que tu parlais de ce changeset en particulier. Je viens de corriger la première relation et j'ai inspecter pour comprendre le problème. Les découpages de way (parents) ont réordonné dans un mauvais sens les way (enfants) dans les relations. C'est assez curieux, je n'avais pas remarqué ce phénomène et je ne crois pas avoir eu d'alerte dans les vérifications de JOSM. Je vais reprendre les relations que tu as pointées.
Charles
Carto'Cité (2025-12-15 13:14:39+00:00): Voilà, j’ai repris toutes les relations que tu avais pointées. Normalement c’est bon mais si tu en trouves d’autres ou si je suis passé à côté d’une cassure, n’hésite pas à me la pointer.
Merci de m’avoir proposé de les réparer moi-même.
Charles
mga_geo (2025-12-15 14:29:01+00:00): Dans certains cas, découpe d'un segment d'accès à un rond-point, JOSM ne met pas dans le bon ordre les segments.
Il y a un ticket ouvert depuis plusieurs mois mais pas encore résolu.
Guylby (2025-11-27 17:59:39+00:00): serait-il possible d'avoir plus d'infos sur la suppression? Ces adresses n'étaient pas présentes sur OSM et ont été ajoutées depuis le Pifomètre vu qu'elles n'étaient pas présentes
Guylby (2025-11-27 18:16:45+00:00): surtout que je puisse identifier la source de la duplication et éviter que cela se reproduise
didier2020 (2025-11-30 07:48:50+00:00): Bonjour,

voila toutes les adresses dupliques que j'ai corrigé
https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/issues/done?country=france_provence_alpes_cote_d_azur_var&item=1230&source=&class=&username=Guylby&bbox=

et ici un exemple
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13312144911
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13313207544/history

Si je peu donner un conseil c'est de verifier avec JOSM après l'upload des données pour éviter les duplications / adresses en double

bon dimanche. 
Didier
Guylby (2025-11-30 15:08:58+00:00): Merci! Je pense avoir compris comment j'ai fais ces erreurs,

Bon dimanche!
danieldegroot2 (2025-11-28 16:26:19+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7060327183
Bus stop no longer in use or demolished. Correctly has lifecycle prefix.

https://api.panoramax.xyz/#pic=94898964-2c2e-46b6-859e-424580ad9a64&focus=pic
danieldegroot2 (2025-11-28 16:37:01+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1039132623
The steps are still there

https://api.panoramax.xyz/#pic=184ea516-c722-4793-9672-8a4aa91496fc&focus=pic

also in 2025-01 image
(at top, click on three dots, then on lamp to increase brightness)
https://api.panoramax.xyz/#pic=6591a139-f3f4-464a-99d1-1cba73954c18&focus=pic

though they are only visible from the street as a dark hole in the wall.
danieldegroot2 (2026-04-27 18:13:29+00:00): Hey Victor,

I see you are using also Panoramax now, so you should be familiar with how to open these links.
If you have time, could you have a look at above comments, please?

Regards,

Daniel
VictorIE (2026-04-28 10:14:19+00:00): Steps fixed: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1504852059/
danieldegroot2 (2026-04-28 11:38:09+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13770316846/history
Entrance is exit only based on red text sign, or handle positions, or ...?
There are at least two handles both outside on each door left/right, similar to main entrance.
Red text on sign is unclear from streetlevel imagery.

First comment about bus stop lifecycle prefix also remains.
ika-chan! (2025-11-27 22:45:03+00:00): You seem to be going back to repeating similar edits like https://osmcha.org/changesets/173003434, mapping roads that do not exist any more (in this changeset's case, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1454229825, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1454229831 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1454229826. We don't map roads that have been demolished. Why are you doing this?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175209718
GATAA RANA (2025-11-28 12:04:46+00:00): It's an ancient road, little man.
ika-chan! (2025-11-28 12:20:49+00:00): First, I am a woman, but you can also call me a squid in reference to Squid Girl, which my avatar comes from. Two, what is the source for an ancient road passing through this area? I am not sure how well Roman Roads are mapped in Greece, and we can't just use any source on the internet.
eggie (2025-11-27 18:37:44+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback   Lijkt me oke...  Een van de weinige eiken die blad houden. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Map_HeRo (2025-11-27 18:40:33+00:00): Ich habe in diesem CS diverse name-Tags, die keine Namen enthalten, sonderrn lediglich Beschreibungen, von den Objekten entfernt. Siehe dazu auch https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/grenzanlagen-bei-point-alpha-rhon/138084
Hendrik Helsper (2025-12-05 23:28:50+00:00): Guten Abend,
Du behauptest in deinem changeset comment, die Hunsrückquerbahn sei in Betrieb und die Sanierung abgeschlossen, wozu ich keine Belege finden konnte. Ich war vor kurzem dort und habe noch Bauarbeiten beobachtet und laut Facebookseite von Hunsrückbahn e.V. fanden am 04.12. Bauarbeiten statt. Hast du eine Quelle für deine abweichende Information?

Außerdem hast du in den Bahnhofen SSIM und SKIR abgebaute (railway=abandoned) und nicht genutzte (railway=disused) als "railway=rail" getagged. Diese Gleise sind entweder nicht vorhanden (SSIM ehem. Gleis 2 und historischer Verlauf Gleis 1) oder nicht nutzbar, da seit der Sanierung nicht mehr mit dem durchgehenden Hauptgleis verbunden (äußere Rampen- und Ladegleise in SKIR). Ich werde diese Änderung deshalb rückgängig machen. Bitte ändere die Karte nur, wenn du dir auch sicher bist, dass deine Änderungen korrekt sind.
Hendrik Helsper (2025-12-11 12:12:26+00:00): Da du nicht antwortest, werde ich die angesprochenen Änderungen (nach Überprüfung vor Ort) rückgängig machen.
stillhart (2025-12-06 21:35:49+00:00): 🤩
Technotion (2025-11-30 04:50:58+00:00): Nice work on the quick edit! I just got back to A2 after Thanksgiving and was going to update but seeing it already done was a pleasant surprise.
I was the one who tagged it under construction a couple months ago, and the city's lack of predicted end date online made me think it could be a while before it opened again. If I knew it was only going to be ~2 months I probably would have just left it. Oh well!
bjanevic (2025-11-30 15:38:08+00:00): Thanks. I was out biking and was surprised to see it was open already. It still needs a lot of updates because I didn't stop to look at anything.
synthfi (2025-11-28 01:51:37+00:00): next time can you split the changeset into at least one per continent
rominail (2025-11-30 14:41:56+00:00): I'll try to see if I can do it, as I made the modifications with the andoid app "street-complete"
ilias_ (2025-11-27 21:20:28+00:00): Source:

https://ledesk.ma/encontinu/adm-annonce-la-mise-en-service-de-la-nouvelle-autoroute-tit-mellil-berrechid/
flohoff (2025-11-28 12:26:02+00:00): Moin,
warum hast du hier das hazmat entfernt? Ist die A30 hier in die Negativliste des Gefahrgutstraßengrundnetzes aufgenommen worden?

Würde mich eigentlich wundern.

Flo
streetuser (2025-11-28 18:02:25+00:00): Hi, vor Ort habe ich nur Wasserschutzgebiet (DE:354) vorgefunden.
flohoff (2025-11-29 16:51:23+00:00): hazmat hat mit Wasserschutzgebiet erstmal nix zu tun.

hazmat tagged das Gefahrgutstraßengrundnetz - Positiv wie Negativ.

Bundesautobahnen gehören typischerweise zum Positivnetz.

Daher ist das entfernen erstmal nicht richtig - es sei denn du hast genauere infos das dieser Abschnitt zum Negativnetz gehört.

Flo
flohoff (2025-11-29 16:56:55+00:00): Ach ja - und selbst wenn würde das hazmat nicht entfernt sondern auf "no" gesetzt werden müssen.

Flo
flohoff (2025-11-29 16:57:50+00:00): Hier im übrigen ein Blogpost von mir von 2009 wo ich mal die Amtsblätter der Kreise GT und ein bisschen Gemüse komplett durchgeackert habe.

https://f.zz.de/posts/200908121002.openstreetmap_gefahrgutstrassengrundnetz/
OlasMapy (2026-06-08 08:47:38+00:00): Hello, i noticed that this changeset consists of name:ru removals around Lwów. What were the motivations?
Taksine (2025-12-09 10:42:57+00:00): 把名称中文又改成英文叫什么“改正编辑错误”？