piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2023-10-13 09:10:23+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 
Please do not cross buildings when you map a path.
Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142495721
Agi on tour (2023-10-13 09:35:09+00:00): Thank you for your comment.
I'm well aware of that rule. I'm quite sure I did not map that path through the building. That path was mapped already as was the building, as you can see in the history of the objects.
I guess I have reroutet the already existing path at another point in order to exactly prevent such a crossing.
In fact many of the already existing paths probably need rerouting or deletion. Trying to delete them produced conflicts at the upload so I left them.
Also the landuse tags need adjustments.
Regarding squaring buildings: I did squaring of many already existing buildings. May be not with all of them.
When I map new building I use the buildings_tool-plugin, wich draws the buildings rectangular from beginning.
However, at this section there are also circular buildings. I guess these shoult remain circular.
Frans S (2023-10-13 09:07:56+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped; however, you did not square the rectangular buildings.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142496121
moje_konto (2023-10-12 20:34:42+00:00): Naprawdę nie da się łączyć wszystkich węzłów stykających się linii? Każdy węzeł nachodzących linii powinien być złączony, i nie powinno być zdublowanych.

Nawet tutaj na podsumowaniu edycji są ostrzeżenia - przed wysłaniem zmian powinno się je przeglądać i poprawiać. Niektóre można pominąć np. dotyczące nietypowych znaczników, ale zdublowane węzły na pewno się poprawia.

Jeśli edytor online ma nieczytelny styl, to można użyć zewnętrznego JOSM, który ma do wyboru inne style.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-10-12 20:30:28+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1086672611
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1086672612

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Frans S (2023-10-13 09:06:36+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 
Please don't connect nodes of buildings to each other, or to other objects,
Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142496418
citrula (2023-10-12 22:01:38+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You can press "Q" in iD to square corners of buildings you draw!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142496453
Frans S (2023-10-13 08:45:01+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142496462
Frans S (2023-10-13 08:41:03+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 
a few remarks.
There is no need to map each and every small path in a settlement. It is open terrain, south of the river, thus in view from a distance.
It is important to connect roads paths to each other to get a network.
The residential area, mapped long time ago, should be adjusted so that it covers all buildings of that settlement.
No need to map fences. Just be sure all buildings have been mapped.
 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142496506
Maps1GIS (2023-10-17 18:24:16+00:00): Correction: Source used was Maxar SecureWatch Imagery 2023-08-03.
citrula (2023-10-12 22:02:43+00:00): Hi, this isn't what I meant - there is a sports center tag (leisure=sports_centre) which you can tag around the entire facility (including the office and all of the courts). You can read about it on the wiki here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dsports_centre

Thank you for contributing!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142496710
MichS (2023-10-13 07:00:26+00:00): Hallo,

was war denn am tag access=customers falsch?

An den Zugangsstellen waren Tore gezeichnet. Was war daran falsch?

Die Wege sind physisch vorhanden, daher waren die in der Datenbank. Sollte es privat sein, dann kann man die als privat zeichnen. Du musst damit rechnen, dass deine Änderungen zurückgesetzt werden.

MFG

M.
Hangar19 (2023-10-13 08:18:01+00:00): Hallo M.
wenn sie zurück gesetzt werden, ist das so. Allerdings werde ich dagegen vorgehen. Es handelt sich um ein privates Grundstück und was von diesem veröffentlicht wird, obliegt allein mir. 
Herzlichen Dank für Ihr Verständnis.
MfG
S.
silversurfer83 (2024-02-05 23:15:43+00:00): Bei OpenStreetMap werden Dinge in einer Geodatenbank erfasst, die vor Ort erkennbar sind. Diese Wege sind, zumindest wenn man dort Gast ist, erkennbar und auch auf den von uns legal nutzbaren Luftbildern sichtbar. Die Tore sowie die Kennzeichnung als private Wege war wohl vollkommen korrekt und wird von allen üblichen Datenauswertern auch berücksichtigt.
Da die Daten von OSM auch von Ihren Gästen sowie von zivilen Einrichtungen wie Notärzten oder dem Pizzadienst genutzt werden ist es in meinen Augen sogar schädlich für Sie selbst, die Daten zu entfernen.
Hier finden Sie weitere Informationen
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property
Ich bitte in Zukunft davon abzusehen korrekt eingetragene Daten zu entfernen.

silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142497819
danieldegroot2 (2023-10-13 10:18:06+00:00): Hey Minh,

I've added some details in
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142515759
( Changes: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=142515759 )

Let me know what you think.

impiaaa adviced against adding an address earlier as most of the other city parks don't have one and 650 is the address for the surrounding apartment complex, but I've left it as-is.

Regards,

Daniel
Minh Nguyen (2023-10-14 19:11:03+00:00): Thank you for taking an interest in this neighborhood!

I agree that many of the city’s parks lack an address [1], but this park has a different address than either of the apartment buildings in the complex [2], because the block was subdivided into parcels with addresses long before the park was built.

[1] https://www.sanjoseca.gov/your-government/departments-offices/parks-recreation-neighborhood-services/parks-trails/search-parks-playgrounds
[2] https://www.sanjoseca.gov/Home/Components/Calendar/Event/6502/
Minh Nguyen (2023-10-14 19:26:51+00:00): Changeset 142589542 adds the apartment buildings’ addresses and also restores the overall development’s landuse area, which had gotten conflated with the plot next to the park where the Center for Creative Arts is being built.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-01 12:53:25+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11258630344/history has cp = 1 that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What you intended to express by using this unusual key? Is this tag needed? Or maybe can it be expressed in a more typical way that would be easier to understand?
jmsbert (2024-05-01 19:26:57+00:00): Hello Mateusz,
good point. Actually "cp" was a typo. What was meant was "capacity" which is a common tag to state how many children can use the playground item in parallel. I have fixed this.
Langlaeufer (2023-10-13 17:32:08+00:00): Hallo Yoonah,
Warum sollte dort zu Fuß gehen verboten sein? Oder steht dort ein Schild? Dann am besten mit angeben. 
Kein Gehweg heißt nicht, das man dort nicht gehen darf. https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/stvo_2013/__25.html
Mein Tipp: die SC-Frage einfach deaktivieren.

Grüße Langläufer
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142498890
aixbrick (2023-10-13 08:17:45+00:00): Hallo,
wenn ich gewusst hätte, dass du da ein paar Tage nach meiner Änderung vorbeikommst und neue Aufnahmen machst... :-)
Bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/75672980 müsste das "motor_vehicle" auf "destination" geändert werden (das kommt zumindest dem "Zufahrt Haus 101 frei" am nächsten).
Welchen Sinn haben eigentlich die aufgestellten Schilder "Fußweg mit Radfahrer frei"? Beziehen die sich auf den Seitenstreifen?
Gruß
FahrradstadtAachen (2023-10-13 13:40:54+00:00): Moin!
Ich habe das "agricultural" bei "motor_vehicle" nun rausgenommen.
Der Sinn der "Gehweg, Rad frei"-Schilder erschließt sich mir auch nicht. Die Schilder waren aber schon immer da. Damals waren sie noch viel absurder, da sie sich wohl auf den Schotterweg bezogen. Natürlich hat kein Fußgänger geschweige denn Radfahrer den matschigen Schotterstreifen benutzt, sondern alle sind natürlich auf dem Asphalt gegangen/gefahren. Mittlerweile ist der Seitenstreifen (rechts der weißen Linie) zumindest größtenteils asphaltiert.
Grüße!
aixbrick (2023-10-13 14:54:08+00:00): Danke.
Also ein Fall von unnötigem Schilderwald... *rolleyes*
ovruni (2023-10-13 00:32:01+00:00): Hola, los nombres NO son para agregar descripciones.
ovruni (2023-10-13 04:51:45+00:00): Hola Máximo, por favor revisa el desplazamiento que se ha indicado en la wiki junto con la tarea.
Saludos
ovruni (2023-10-13 00:34:24+00:00): No se tiene que poner nombres, voy a revertir todos sus cambios incorrectos del mapa donde ademas se ha colocado el hashtag
Constructeur (2023-10-12 23:27:10+00:00): À supprimer erreur de ma part
VictorIE (2023-10-14 20:18:58+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10946685869

These are normally mapped as

power=pole
transformer=distribution

with NO power=transformer.

Like this one: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10659851916
Dawid2849 (2023-10-13 07:32:26+00:00): Numery są zamienione, nr 7 to powinen być okręg Chełm, a nr 7 to powinen być Lublin
Dawid2849 (2023-10-13 07:34:33+00:00): Poprawiłem
Dawid2849 (2023-10-13 07:36:40+00:00): a co myślisz o dodaniu węzła miasta, w którym znajduje się siedziba okręgowej komisji wyborczej jako admin_centre?
kubahahaha (2023-10-13 07:58:38+00:00): Dzięki. Szczerze mówiąc to nie wiem czemu Wiki zaleca admin_center, ale skoro coś tam powinno się dodać, to chyba nic lepszego nie ma.
Poszukam jeszcze jak inni to zaznaczają I postaram się poprawić Wiki, to są pierwsze relacje boundary=political w Polsce.
Nie jestem też pewien użycia political_division=*
Dawid2849 (2023-10-13 09:40:25+00:00): Też tak mi się wydaje, że po prostu nie ma nic lepszego niż admin_centre. a co do political_divison=PL:sejm, to jak dla mnie jest okej
kubahahaha (2023-10-13 10:10:40+00:00): Tylko co w innych okręgach - do Rady Miasta np. jak ustawić sensownie admin_center? W ogóle admin center to jakaś taka słaba nazwa :/
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-12-02 11:25:20+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/177354564/history - there is no need, benefit or good reason to add descriptive names like name=Grass to all landuse=grass

type of object is already tagged in OSM by mapping landuse=grass
Kuatsystems (2023-12-02 15:56:02+00:00): thanks so much! i know i messed up on that, thanks for fixing it
santamariense (2025-05-21 13:25:31+00:00): johnmogi,

Você precisa ter cuidado em suas edições. Nessa changeset você deletou linhas porque provavelmente achava que elas não tinha utilidade. Porém, elas faziam parte da delimitação de um bairro, e agora só está restando o ponto do bairro sem a delimitação.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11288111/history

Por favor, ou entenda a fundo o que uma geometria é para tomar a decisão de deletar, ou não delete.
Dawid2849 (2023-10-13 09:49:42+00:00): Okręg 33 to woj. świętokrzyskie. Warszawa to 19
Dawid2849 (2023-10-13 10:00:05+00:00): Naprawiłem
kubahahaha (2023-10-13 10:11:27+00:00): Nie wiem czemu ja to tak pokręciłem, przejrzę jeszcze później
Dawid2849 (2023-10-13 10:22:47+00:00): Na szybko przejrzałem wszystkie okręgi, gdy dodawałem do nich linki do wikipedii. Teraz już powinno być wszystko dobrze
kubahahaha (2023-10-13 12:10:38+00:00): Po za tym że brakuje większości :D

Zaktualizowałem dokumentację
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:boundary=political?uselang=pl
Dawid2849 (2023-10-13 12:32:55+00:00): > Po za tym że brakuje większości :D
No tak, jeszcze sporo do dodania jest. 

> Zaktualizowałem dokumentację 
Świetna robota!
Dawid2849 (2023-10-14 14:38:59+00:00): > Po za tym że brakuje większości :D

już są wszystkie okręgi do sejmu, teraz "tylko" zostały okręgi do senatu :P
kubahahaha (2023-10-15 14:32:10+00:00): A rady gmin? :D
Króliczka trzeba gonić, a nie dogonić.
Fajnie że się udało, na osmose jest wizualizacja, na Wiki też dopisałem jak w Overpassie wyświetlić. Fajnie że tak sprawnie poszło :-)
Enock4seth (2023-10-21 23:30:44+00:00): What is this https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1215191227 ? Kindly stop creating issues within OpenStreetMap if you are not sure of what to do.
kisney11 (2023-10-22 19:24:04+00:00): Is there any something wrong within the created relations?
Enock4seth (2023-10-22 19:39:51+00:00): Do you know the difference between a way and a relation?
kisney11 (2023-10-22 19:59:37+00:00): The way can be deleted.
Enock4seth (2023-10-22 20:34:18+00:00): This of kind contributions to OSM helps nobody, kindly avoid playing with living data.
flohoff (2023-10-13 08:15:18+00:00): Hi,
ich habe hier die routingänderung gesehen. Aber die nodes zwischen denen ich getestet habe waren auch fies gesetzt.

Ich habe das mal geändert - d.h. die 3 nodes drumherum durch einen in Brake Downtown ersetzt. Mal den nächsten run abwarten. ich denke dann wird hier nichts mehr durch gehen.

Flo
Ökkel (2023-10-13 19:57:36+00:00): Vorher die Route ausgerechnet durch die kleinsten Straßen war aber auch zu falsch, da musste ich was machen.
flohoff (2023-10-14 08:38:38+00:00): 
Es sind halt alles immer nur relative gewichtungen. Das ist manchmal tricky das richtig hinzubekommen. Wird auch jahre dauern bis das bei OSM richtig gut funktioniert.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-13 06:55:28+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15157
❤️‍🔥 (2023-10-13 06:42:16+00:00): Hey, thanks for your edit. Just wondering what source you used for this name change? LINZ says this is called "Pitt Road", and the businesses along this road use "Pitt Road" as their address (e.g. https://theplantmarket.co.nz/contact-us )

I'm curious because I can't find any information online about "Aintree Way". Cheers
RYHUDU03 (2023-10-15 18:39:59+00:00): Hey, thanks for clarifying that with me. It looks like Aintree Way is an upcoming change as there has been a new temporary sign put up on the street. Also, the plantmarket business has moved out of there and a developer has moved into what was 68 Pitt Road (https://www.trademe.co.nz/a/property/commercial/lease/listing/4286100674?bof=CAzi5Eec).
❤️‍🔥 (2023-10-16 01:14:19+00:00): perfect, thanks for confirming
totera (2023-10-13 12:46:57+00:00): Hai inventato di testa tua questi nomi???  
Ho annullato le modifiche in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142522780
alessandrocarmeli (2023-10-13 14:13:47+00:00): Ok
totera (2023-10-13 16:25:34+00:00): Scusa, potresti motivare meglio le tue azioni? Non è la prima volta che fai modifiche completamente infondate e rispondi "Ok"
NieWnen (2024-06-15 16:12:42+00:00): Część wygenerowanych błędów związanych z drogami przecinającymi budynki pochodzi m.in. z tych importów...
NorthCrab (2024-06-15 16:48:26+00:00): Hej widziałem twoje poprawki! Import nie sprawdza konfliktów z drogami, czy powinien? Takie problemy jest dosyć łatwo naprawić i wskazują miejsca gdzie dawno nie było żadnego mapującego. Ale łatwo można dodać opcję pomijania wprowadzania zmian w takich miejscach.
NieWnen (2024-06-15 17:10:06+00:00): Jak dla mnie powinien pomijać. To jest wada importów w pełni automatycznych, że mapujący przy okazji poprawi, a tu tracimy ten element :/
MxxCon (2023-10-18 18:42:10+00:00): Hello.
Please note that generally it's better to update existing features to match the current real world rather than delete and create new ones like you did here.
Editing/updating existing features preserves the history of that object which can be useful to refer to in the future if there's ever a need for that.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142502660
bwong114 (2023-10-19 02:23:49+00:00): Thank you for the tip and will do so going forward. I am still new to OSM and the situation was a bit awkward. Basically I had added two new nodes first because I generally try not to be destructive. Then I noticed that this node I had deleted had the two tags:

dish=sandwich	
disused:shop=yes

I could not delete these tags as JOSM would then give a validation error as it detected duplicate house numbers. My alternatives were to leave the tags there or delete the node. I chose the latter.

I now understand that I should have reused the node to begin with.
MxxCon (2023-10-19 02:33:50+00:00): Josm is a rather advanced, complicated and not the most user friendly, but it is very powerful and flexible.
However, still consider giving iD and/or RapiD a try. They are simpler for the most common tasks.
HansWesterback (2023-10-23 15:25:54+00:00): Du verkar ha ändrat namn, en del av Masmovägen heter plötsligt Myrstuguberget, ser skumt ut, hela vägen heter Masmovägen i alla källor jag kollat?
ovruni (2023-10-13 04:11:14+00:00): Hola, los hashtag NO deben de ir en las etiquetas.
Jordan Moldow (2024-01-22 00:27:11+00:00): Somehow the map of the history walk medallions ended up with an extra node: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1GgO . There are two identical nodes, at different GPS coordinates, for "1870–1872 Vine Street Chinatown". I don't believe any medallions are missing; I counted 13 medallions in the mapillary pictures I took, and they seem to all be accounted for.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11258982802

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11258982803
Minh Nguyen (2024-01-22 00:32:32+00:00): You’re right, I must’ve duplicated that one, forgot it, and duplicated it again as a starting point for the next medallion. Thanks for your vigilance. Fixed in changeset 146532532.
Aerond (2023-10-13 04:21:49+00:00): Fixat: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142503966
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-13 06:53:41+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15158
NorthCrab_upload (2023-10-13 04:40:25+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, zamień addr:place na addr:city. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11258364834

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
moje_konto (2023-10-13 04:52:40+00:00): Niepotrzebna edycja, już NorthCrab poprawił, teraz jest znowu źle, znacznik zdublowany.
NorthCrab (2023-10-13 14:05:59+00:00): Ja znacznik widzę, tylko trzeba odświeżyć cache w przeglądarce :-)
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-14 06:40:04+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15165
Gadiel Astoquilca (2023-10-13 05:01:01+00:00): #FLCHgrdUNMSM
Gadiel Astoquilca (2023-10-13 05:01:22+00:00): #FLCHgrdUNMSM
moje_konto (2023-10-13 05:02:45+00:00): Ale dlaczego usunięto addr:place i zostawiono addr:street?
Pozostałe adresy na osiedlu używają addr:place.
Gadiel Astoquilca (2023-10-13 05:01:33+00:00): #FLCHgrdUNMSM
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-11 03:31:32+00:00): Thanks for mapping but the mapping is irrelevant. Please look after OSMWiki for better understanding of OSM. Please look OSMWiki strongly, Happy Mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142504868
Fizzie-DWG (2024-01-08 03:46:59+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146013464
Gadiel Astoquilca (2023-10-13 05:11:40+00:00): #FLCHgrdUNMSM
joel56dt (2023-10-13 16:38:07+00:00): Thanks for adding these businesses. Welcome to OpenStreetMap!
eerib (2023-10-13 05:59:08+00:00): Sorry, this was my error back in one of my first edits as a new mapper. Thank you for catching it and fixing it!
freeExec (2023-10-13 05:32:41+00:00): Не нужно вносить какие-то описательные тексты, вроде "проезд к какому-то объекту", это не название улицы.
Так же должно быть полностью написано без сокращений, не "ул. Овражная", а "Овражная улица"
Екатерина Барышникова7 (2023-10-13 06:41:13+00:00): данная дорога "подъезд к МР "Дружбы" сидит так на кадастровом учете и в перечне автомобильных дорог.
freeExec (2023-10-13 14:03:44+00:00): Ну и что, это же не кадастр или перечень, тут свои правила.
Langlaeufer (2023-12-15 07:48:12+00:00): Sind diese verbindungen vom Radweg zur Straße wirklich baulich vorhanden. In den Luftbildern sind sie (noch?) nicht zu erkennen.
emersonveenstra (2023-10-13 10:10:54+00:00): Hi there,

I undid this change, deleting an existing object is generally not the correct thing to do (assuming it still exists). It's valid to put the restaurant tags on the building, you don't need to make a new node for that.
Gadiel Astoquilca (2023-10-13 06:02:10+00:00): #FLCHgrdUNMSM