piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2023-04-23 15:51:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:57:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:08:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-26 16:20:23+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2090240377
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10695109061
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/237917403

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab (2023-02-26 16:31:45+00:00): Możliwe że brakuje oznaczenia nazwy na samej ulicy :p
mavl (2023-04-23 15:49:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:10:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:02:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:11:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:03:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
Frans S (2023-04-16 14:31:40+00:00): Hello. 
On this changeset you mapped many roads and buildings, but !! You did not tag the majority.
Task 728 of project 14233
Please keep this in mind at future mappings.
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133049534
JayTurnr (2024-07-23 10:58:26+00:00): Hi, what's the source for this name?
MalcolmStory21 (2024-07-23 15:03:04+00:00): Mainly Word of mouth from people who have lived in Ramsgate for a long time.  (Some of them no longer with us, I am afraid).  If that is not considered sufficient, I would not object to the name being removed, though it would be a shame.

Many books have been written about Ramsgate, and a printed source could probably be found - I do seem to remember reading it somewhere, but I cannot find where.

Malcolm
JayTurnr (2024-07-23 16:50:13+00:00): Hi Malcolm, 

That's perfectly sufficient by my books. I lived in Margate for most my life and never heard it, but it also took me way to long than I'm willing to admit to hear the name Coffin Corner 😅

J
kartler175 (2023-02-28 13:47:53+00:00): Please ccheck and fix https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-74.56316&lat=45.02945&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.95&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways
mavl (2023-04-23 16:00:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:52:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
Baloo Uriza (2023-02-26 16:44:53+00:00): addr:street should have "North" instead of "N"; consider adding North to the name of the adjacent street, too.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133049733
monotar (2023-02-26 17:52:02+00:00): seit wann ist ein Arbeitsamt residential?
wermak (2023-02-27 02:36:24+00:00): Einfach mal den Saxony WebAtlasSN verwenden. Ist bei all diesen Eintragungen eine gute Vorlage. Ein Arbeitsamt ist auf jeden Fall auch kein commercial/industrial.
Falsernet (2023-04-02 00:19:05+00:00): Hi, can you explain how this regards brands?
mavl (2023-04-23 16:08:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:48:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:59:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:58:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:09:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:59:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:53:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:50:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:50:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:53:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:06:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
EvanSiroky (2023-03-01 22:57:25+00:00): Hey there! I'm a local mapper from Scotts Valley, California. I see that you requested a review of this changeset, so I'm giving it a review. 

This new trail addition looks great! 

If you are interested in a more complex way to improve this, you could add this new path to be part of a Hiking Route Relation. See the OSM Wiki documentation about Hiking Routes here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route=hiking. These hiking routes relations show up in many maps such as this one: https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#?map=13.0/37.8362/-121.8947
monotar (2023-02-26 17:43:34+00:00): proposed... lass es einfach: ernsthaft! DU kennst dich hier nicht aus.
mavl (2023-04-23 16:11:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:58:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:12:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:11:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
OSM_RogerWilco (2024-01-09 19:31:40+00:00): Moin DCA,

in dieser Änderung hast Du leider wieder die falschen Straßennamen für Kirchboitzen eingetragen, die ich gerade zuvor entfernt habe. Kirchboitzen hat keine Straßennamen und bei OpenStreetMap sollte der Ortsname nicht als Straßenname erfasst werden. Kannst Du das bitte korrigieren?

Danke! :-)
OSM_RogerWilco (2024-01-26 14:28:40+00:00): Ich habe die "Straßennamen" jetzt wieder entfernt. Bitte nicht wieder eintragen. Danke!

Wenn SC fragt gibt es auch die Auswahl "Sie hat keinen Namen" (unter "Weitere Antworten").
mavl (2023-04-23 15:59:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:04:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:07:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
Bienson (2023-02-26 21:54:04+00:00): Kita bereits als Fläche gemappt - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1053404629

Jetzt doppelt eingetragen.
Ans Gebäude gehört nur building=kindergarten, wenn die Kita als Fläche gemappt ist
Windy (2023-02-26 22:22:09+00:00): Ist behoben, danke für den Hinweis.
Bienson (2023-02-27 19:46:35+00:00): War vllt. ein bisschen missverständlich formuliert, aber die Adresse bleibt natürlich auch am Gebäude (+ zusätzlich am Kindergartengelände)
Windy (2023-02-28 21:21:22+00:00): Alles klar, Adresse ist wiederhergestellt.
mavl (2023-04-23 16:08:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:48:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:56:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:51:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:09:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
martinst (2023-02-26 17:02:42+00:00): Bei name=* werden nur Eigennamen eingetragen.
Đuro Jiří (2024-07-14 13:31:42+00:00): Ciao Domenico61,
sai che hai aggiunto numero civico sulle strisce pedonali?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3175088690/history
Đuro Jiří (2024-07-14 17:14:01+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12040012480/history
Posizione giusta
mavl (2023-04-23 16:07:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:00:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:12:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
RodrigoVi (2023-06-09 08:52:30+00:00): For the nodes https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8448938300 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/906550068: I find it strange that you have set values for "bus_bay", when the possible values are: "both", "right" or "left" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bus%20bay?uselang=fr#Values) and don't seem to apply to nodes.
nw520 (2023-06-11 22:51:37+00:00): Hi RodrigoVi, I added both values by accident. Thank you for the pointer, I've removed the tags.
woodpeck_repair (2023-03-03 00:50:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 133232206, 133232218, 133232224, 133232227, 133232225, 133232208, 133232216, 133232213, 133232177, 133232229, 133232203, 133232220, 133232198, 133232180, 133232189, 133224701, 133232215, 133232214, 133232188, 133232199, 133232207, 133232205, 133232182, 133232222, 133232186, 133232200, 133232191, 133232223, 133232209, 133232169, 133232230, 133232194, 133232197, 133232210 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import with unclear licensing in Madagascar
:-} (2023-02-27 14:31:07+00:00): Większość budynków ma błędne kształty.W ogóle po co przywracasz budynki które zostały zburzone?Do poprawy to jest
syntex (2023-02-27 15:37:58+00:00): Zaraz poprawię
syntex (2023-02-27 21:29:53+00:00): Dużą część poprawiłem, resztę postaram się jutro
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-27 07:56:46+00:00): Please do not use symbols or abbreviations such as "@".
marczoutendijk (2023-02-27 15:51:47+00:00): Grazie mille per aver adottato il tuo stile di commento!
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-11-17 11:01:09+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10695278117/history - czy jest to nazwa tego wierzchołka czy opis typu obiektu?
Mariusz Bajak (2023-11-22 21:55:25+00:00): Jest to opis obiektu. Odwiedziłem to miejsce i z tego co pamiętam był to wierzchołek wzgórza. Jest on nawet oznaczony na jednej z map Compass.
Nie ma tam jednak nazwy.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-11-23 09:15:34+00:00): to w takim razie opisu nie trzeba dodawać!

Czy OsmAnd zachęca by dodawać opis do nazwy? (bardzo często ludzie robiący ten błąd edytują OsmAndem, mimo iż to dość rzadki sposób edytowania)
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-11-23 09:15:49+00:00): Jak coś to poprawiłem ten przypadek
Mariusz Bajak (2023-11-26 18:04:45+00:00): Ok. Dziękuję. Edytuję OsmAndem, bo akurat tej aplikacji używam jako mapy. A poza tym słabo jestem obeznany z edycją od strony technicznej. Bardziej zależy mi, by dodawać obiekty, które napotykam w terenie.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-11-26 18:39:21+00:00): Dzięki za dodawanie informacji! By nie było, takie poprawki łatwo potem zrobić
YomanNH (2024-06-11 08:41:10+00:00): Usunąłem nazwę opisową.
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-27 07:58:21+00:00): Do not change roadways into cartpaths just for your game.  This is not acceptable on OSM.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1149698999
user_5359 (2023-03-24 16:35:09+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/178601190. What is the meaning of the tags
colour = #98817b
fill_color = #98817b
?
Tutby (2023-03-24 16:43:48+00:00): Hello.
This is attempt to add colour to railway platform. But it looks like that this object does'nt support colour tags.
user_5359 (2023-03-24 16:53:59+00:00): In fact, the standard map does not know different colorings of platforms. This behavior is known for routes in the transport sector, maybe you can ask the transport maps if a support is useful. However, the color should always be written with ou (British variant).
Tutby (2023-03-24 17:41:41+00:00): Yes, sure. Just misspelling (((
Tutby (2023-03-24 17:46:49+00:00): Any idea how to colorize paving stones surface?
user_5359 (2023-03-26 17:57:14+00:00): Please have a look on https://taginfo.osm.org/search?q=surface%3Acolour
Tutby (2023-03-27 05:31:07+00:00): thanks, I already found : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface%3Dpaving_stones
emersonveenstra (2023-03-01 16:41:47+00:00): Hi,

This changeset introduced several duplicate nodes:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10695315851 duplicate of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10689801264
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10695315552 duplicate of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10689801355
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10695315482 duplicate of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10689801252
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10695315590 duplicate of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10689801222

Could you please fix these? Thanks!
MxxCon (2023-02-27 00:10:38+00:00): Hello.
Once I request that you pay closer attention when mapping features and not glue them together unless they are actually attached. In this edit you attached a swimming pool to a residential area and another swimming pool to a house where there's clearly visible separation between them.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133053348
JJIglesias (2023-02-26 18:35:45+00:00): Slds. Importante a las vias agregarles la etiqueta de superficie (surface=xx) si no se sabe a detalle con poner los valores paved o unpaved, es suficiente.
Excelente edicion. Gracias
JJ
mavl (2023-04-23 15:54:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:49:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:02:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:58:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
Stephan_HAL (2023-05-01 20:43:23+00:00): Die Grenzen von (inoffiziellen) Stadtvierteln sind nicht immer so klar definiert, dass man sie als Fläche darstellen kann. Deshalb sollte man das – wie unter https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:place%3Dneighbourhood dokumentiert – eher als Punkt im ungefähren Zentrum des Viertels markieren, so wie es beim Steintor-, Bebel-, Neumarkt- und Mühlweg- oder Lutherviertel z. B. auch gemacht wurde. Es stellt sich z. B. die Frage, ob das Wohngebiet nördlich der Krausenstraße auch zum Medizinerviertel gehört, und wenn nein, was dann? Und auch der restliche Teil südlich der Halberstädter/Forsterstraße müsste eigentlich komplett dazugehören. Um dem ganzen keinen offiziellen Status zu verleihen, sollte, meiner Meinung nach, die Fläche entfernt und der Punkt wiederhergestellt werden.

Die Erläuterung zur Namensgebung kommt mir außerdem auch sehr anekdotisch vor. Mein Verständnis war immer, dass es Medizinerviertel heißt, weil die Straßen nach Medizinern benannt sind, nicht, weil dort vorzugsweise Mediziner lebten. Gibt es da offizielle Quellen zur Namensgebung?
mavl (2023-04-23 15:50:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:52:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
user_12523467 (2023-03-06 15:43:51+00:00): Hello, thanks for adding Baghdad Loop Tracks, please pay attention at the power lines, you made a intersecting with the track you added at node n10695380525, I've fix it.
Langlaeufer (2023-02-26 19:14:42+00:00): Wie ist der Weg denn genau beschildert
Lkw gesperrt, Landw. Verkehr frei? Ich empfehle https://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133054172