piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
BCNorwich (2023-10-02 16:24:48+00:00): Hi, If there are two gates, one atop the other then that's OK, that's how you've depicted them. I suspect though that there is only one gate at each position.

Regards Bernard.
danieldegroot2 (2023-10-02 17:17:10+00:00): Please read the first paragraph and the linked page again. So,
- I already understand mapping an object as i.e. both a node and a way is usually considered a duplicate.
- There are, however, cases where it may be useful to keep both, as explained on the linked page.
- The node is representing the functional, routable point on the way at which the way is obstructed by the physical barrier. Properties like access can be added to this node.
- The way is representing the exact geometry of this physical barrier. It is there solely to give further detail. Data consumers can ignore it.

There is only one gate, based on aerial imagery, but it is mapped as both a node and a way where possible to properly detail some of its properties (shape, topology, ...). It is not intended as a duplicate of the node.

There is no consensus on mapping such features as both a node, way, or area. (last one not relevant here)

Again, let me know if anything is unclear.
BCNorwich (2023-10-02 17:52:08+00:00): Hi, Nothing at all is unclear, there are not two gates. 

There is no need whatever for duplication, as all your gate data and more can be tagged to either a node or a line. Your line only depicts the width of the gate, this width can be tagged to a node.

Regards Bernard.
danieldegroot2 (2023-10-02 18:51:01+00:00): Both are now mapped as a node.

I have made
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1212233244
a fence, as it could be part fence / part gate, but it is not a hedge, which seems to be on either side.

Regards,

Daniel
NorthCrab_upload (2023-10-02 08:00:18+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11155950233
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1212448442

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Julien39 (2023-10-02 07:56:53+00:00): Ah ah bien joué, j'allais m'y coller ;)
benoitdd (2023-10-02 10:44:35+00:00): "Trêge" de la Cordière et "Treige" de la Tour Chamblans? est-ce que les 2 orthographes sont valides?
(je découvre d'ailleurs le terme, l'équivalent des traboules lyonnaises?)
Camille Jeannin (2023-10-02 12:49:38+00:00): Je n'avais pas vu l'orthographe du "trêge de la Cordière" quand j'ai créé celui de la tour Chamblans. Je connaissais "treige" qui est d'ailleurs l'orthographe utilisée sur le cadastre. Après quelques recherches, je ne vois aucune références à l'orthographe "trêge" sur internet. A défaut d'explication, je remets "treige" comme sur le cadastre et le Géoportail.
Il semblerait que ce soit effectivement l'équivalent franc-comtois des traboules lyonnaises
Julien39 (2023-10-02 15:02:08+00:00): Oui c'est aussi l'orthographe qui figure sur les plaques de rue, ce qui ne laisse guère place au doute.
Eman_Mehrez (2023-10-03 09:33:32+00:00): Hello Renas Azad,

I noticed you added this bridge and it does not already exist in all satellite images.

Could you provide us with the source you used to add this bridge?

Regards
Eman_Mehrez
Renas Azad (2023-10-03 10:23:40+00:00): hello eman.

i was not added it, i was applied a small edit on it onley.
if you open the history of changesets you see my edit is version 3!
you can ask the version 1 editor about it on this link:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/28664905

best  regards.
Eman_Mehrez (2023-10-03 11:21:35+00:00): Hello Renas Azad;

These are the links for a bridge that I mean, that's added from you with "version:1":
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/1212449783
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/1212449781
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/1212449782
Could you check it, please?

Regards
Eman_Mehrez
Renas Azad (2023-10-03 12:41:01+00:00): hello eman.

but this bridge is exist in bing imagery on open street map!
how you don't saw it?

best regards.
Eman_Mehrez (2023-10-03 13:21:59+00:00): Hello Renas Azad;

I already checked all the satellite images before I sent you a comment.
Unfortunately, this bridge does not exist, according to the last satellite image in MaxarSecurewatch.

In addition, We occasionally use Maxar’s most recent nonpublic imagery for updates in OpenStreetMap. We always prioritize the use of public imagery, but at some locations where new changes are not seen in public imagery options, we will use Maxar’s nonpublic imagery to ensure the map is up to date.
with image date "Maxar SecureWatch Imagery 2023-02-17.

In addition, you can check sentinel-hub its free website in this location.
Link:
https://apps.sentinel-hub.com/sentinel-playground/?source=S2L2A&lat=36.389488466077786&lng=43.1158447265625&zoom=16&preset=1_TRUE_COLOR&layers=B01,B02,B03&maxcc=99.95&gain=1.0&gamma=1.0&time=2021-04-01%7C2021-10-23&atmFilter=&showDates=false

Best Regards
Eman_Mehrez
Renas Azad (2023-10-03 14:16:49+00:00): hello eman.
as long as it not exists in newist imagery you can delete it.
i ask you if you can help me about how i can reach maxars most recent imagery?
because it was removed from open street map!

best regards.
GrumpyGorilla (2023-10-02 08:44:48+00:00): Looks like a bad update from Organic Maps. Will fix
eggie (2023-10-02 09:12:52+00:00): De info heb ik even samengevoegd met de adresnode.. De postcode verschilde overigens. Ik heb de BAG (Kadaster)  aangehouden. 

MVG
eggie
GrumpyGorilla (2023-10-02 15:21:30+00:00): Het lijkt erop dat het verkeerd was op de Starbuck-website, bedankt voor je deelname!
NorthCrab_upload (2023-10-02 08:20:23+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/960757014

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
WieKo68 (2024-06-11 08:32:58+00:00): poprawione
richlv (2023-10-02 13:34:19+00:00): Hi, what does "Gate officially has to be open" mean here?
PS_LV (2023-10-02 15:23:13+00:00): There is law in Latvia what every river coast has to be freely available for public but that is not welcome by private owners near by.
There are gates in every side of this river side path. One of the gates is closed to be entered from other side.
I would not want commute app to guide me through there once again.
richlv (2023-10-03 10:05:18+00:00): Thanks, I believe in this case they are not allowed to fence up to 4m (10m for select larger bodies of water) from the edge of the river (or the top of the steep banks), so this particular gate might be legal.

Definitely a correct approach on mapping the current situation - if there was a legal requirement to allow passage at this point, it might be worth reporting to the local council instead.
mavl (2024-12-04 15:22:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159923310 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149746659].
mavl (2024-12-04 15:21:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159923310 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149746659].
johsin18 (2023-10-03 13:47:53+00:00): Hmm, ohne Bindestrich ist das eigentlich keine korrekte Rechtschreibung.  Online findet man es aber tatsächlich mit und ohne Bindestrich. Steht es tatsächlich ohne Bindestrich auf dem Straßenschild?
timoteosg (2023-10-03 15:56:56+00:00): Ja! Auf dem Schild steht „Senigallia Platz“.
mavl (2024-12-04 15:21:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159923310 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149746659].
mavl (2024-12-04 15:21:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159923310 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149746659].
mavl (2024-12-04 15:22:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159923310 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149746659].
OldManCelli (2023-10-18 01:39:07+00:00): JaneAmerica12 - please be careful. You have duplicated hundreds of buildings in two different changesets
142034772 and 142027375
Is this some kind of import? Just wondering why there are so many duplicate buildings.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-02 18:17:27+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/505418853/history has access:foot = yes that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
Would using foot access tag (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:foot ) be fitting at least equally well?
eggie (2023-10-02 09:09:25+00:00): Dag Michel.. Je hebt het al aangepast. Ik heb adresnode 101A weer hersteld. 

MVG
eggie
mapperue (2024-01-03 11:20:02+00:00): Hi, you used the wrong format for the opening hours of this object:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1212454348
Use the format according to the documentation:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours
mavl (2024-12-04 15:22:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159923310 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149746659].
map per (2023-10-06 13:54:40+00:00): Wegen review_requested:
Die Wege sollten für Fußgänger und Radfahrer vorgesehen sein, insofern waren foot=designated und bicycle=designated hier schon richtig eingezeichnet. Ich würde das zurück ändern.

Viele Grüße
map per
juhanjuku (2023-10-02 18:50:40+00:00): Käisime selle raja läbi 6. märtsil 2021 aastal ja salvestasin ka gps träki. Tähised polnud just kõige värskemad, aga rada oli ilusti läbitav. Kustutada ainult mingi kaudse info põhjal pole väga korrektne.
dgmapping (2023-10-04 08:00:43+00:00): Raja esialgsel kaardistamisel, mis oli aastal 2015, märgiti selgelt, et tegu on planeeritava rajaga: "planned sport track".

Kommentaar "ei leidnud mingit nähtavat rada" viitab otseselt sellele, et antud planeeritud rada jäi kahjuks paberi peale:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/30920562

Antud gps logi pole vastavuses selle planeeritud rajaga:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/juhanjuku/traces/10712855

Ka väikeste metsaradade kaardistamisel tuleb lähtuda sellest, mis reaalselt olemas on:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Verifiability
mavl (2024-12-04 15:22:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159923310 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149746659].
Geo-Tobi (2025-02-04 10:49:07+00:00): Hier wurde Highway von path auf footway geändert, aber bicycle=designated blieb stehen. Das ist nun eine ungültige Kombination. 
Bitte um Korrektur.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/33052762/
mavl (2024-12-04 15:21:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159923310 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149746659].
mavl (2024-12-04 15:21:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159923310 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149746659].
mavl (2024-12-04 15:22:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159923310 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149746659].
mavl (2024-12-04 15:21:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159923310 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149746659].
mavl (2024-12-04 15:22:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159923310 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149746659].
arjunaraoc (2024-01-03 00:58:31+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).

Check my update to fix minor issues: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145819320

Happy mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142028969
ivanbranco (2023-10-03 09:27:06+00:00): Hi mhamad, welcome to OSM

do these apartments have a name?
mavl (2024-12-04 15:22:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159923310 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149746659].
mavl (2024-12-04 15:21:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159923310 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149746659].
Florek89 (2023-10-28 14:03:52+00:00): Błędnie dodałeś building=yes dla całego terenu muzeum przez co wszystko renderuje się jako budynek.
Nie wiem co miałeś na myśli cofam do poprzedniego stanu.
AndySchulte (2023-10-10 08:16:37+00:00): Hallo axel007,

Vollsperrung der Kreisstraßen 12 und 54 zwischen Klecken und Buchholz ist aufgehoben. Seit dem vergangenen Wochenende haben Autofahrer dort wieder freie Fahrt, denn der Kreisverkehrsplatz ist fertig. 

Grüße Andy
axel007 (2023-10-10 19:41:40+00:00): Habs versucht. Ist nicht schön. Zumindest die Position des Kreisverkehr sollte stimmen. Gruß Axel
AndySchulte (2023-10-11 02:49:29+00:00): Moin, sieht doch erstmal gut aus. Danke.
Ich wollte da nicht rumfummeln da ich kein brauchbares Bildmaterial zu finde.

Gruß Andy
pi11 (2024-03-16 03:23:58+00:00): Hi,
The cycle path added with this changeset doubled some other parts, and is not nicely aligned with the real cycle path (but offset a couple of meters to the road).

Thank you,
eggie (2023-10-02 11:10:14+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback  Alle info heb ik verplaatst naar de adresnode.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
blef (2023-10-02 19:12:02+00:00): Bonjour,
J'ai rétabli le Bar des Sports du complexe Joa Casino. J'y suis passé cet après-midi: c'est toujours ouvert et il n'y a pas de fermeture planifiée.
Peut-être une confusion avec "l'autre" Bar des Sports de St-Paul-lès-Dax, avenue de la Liberté https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5990421937
jeslop (2023-10-02 14:05:48+00:00): Hola Carlos. No es correcto eliminar las vías porque sean privadas, existen etiquetas para marcar esta característica: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:access. En OSM solo se debe eliminar lo que no existe en la realidad.
Revierto el cambio.

Saludos,
Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
Frans S (2023-10-02 10:24:04+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
A remark
When you spot a walled area, (to keep cattle f.i. , map it as barrier=wall rather than building=construction.
Best regards
racky (2023-10-02 16:20:57+00:00): Hello, Thanks for the advice
MxxCon (2023-10-03 02:41:31+00:00): Hello.
Please note that collection_times tag must follow the same syntax as opening_hours= tag as documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours
Its syntax can get a bit involved, so you can use sites like https://projets.pavie.info/yohours/ and https://www.webmapping.cyou/WebToOSMOH/ to help you generate valid values. 👍
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142031228
NorthCrab_upload (2023-10-02 10:11:27+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11233355439

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eteb3 (2023-10-02 10:39:48+00:00): Occupation Rd, not Corporation Rd
Frans S (2023-10-04 09:55:11+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
This is a building/ road project. Urgent ! PLease focus on those objects. 
Landuse objects are not requested.
Best regards
habi (2024-10-21 09:52:47+00:00): Dieser Defi ist nicht beim Hallenbad lokalisiert, obwohl er laut Beschreibung dort ist.
Ich habe den Defi zum Hallenbad bewegt.
chnuessli (2024-10-21 14:42:17+00:00): Angepasst: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158173707
habi (2024-10-21 17:47:44+00:00): 👌
literan (2023-10-23 12:31:19+00:00): т.к. вы не реагируете и продолжаете массово лепить дубли тега заправки (amenity=fuel), я буду просить вашей блокировки и отката ваших правок
MarinaKuzko (2023-10-23 13:25:30+00:00): Извините за ошибку. Прошу вас не блокировать меня. Прошу объяснить почему нельзя ставить  тег amenity=fuel на контур здания, чтобы в дальнейшем я не делала таких ошибок.
literan (2023-10-23 14:19:40+00:00): дело не в том, что "нельзя ставить тег amenity=fuel на контур здания".

можно.


Нельзя дублировать объекты. amenity=fuel это тег заправки. Заправка одна, значит должен быть один объект в ОСМ (неважно, точка, полигон, - это может быть как здание, так и вся территория заправки - ОСМ не запрещает наносить по-разному).

А тут уже была обозначена заправка, стоял этот тег на точке https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/256664434

а вы еще и на контур здания заправки продублировали.


почитайте внимательно этот текст: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Один_объект_-_один_элемент_OSM
MarinaKuzko (2023-10-23 14:35:08+00:00): Спасибо за ответ. Поняла свою ошибку. Буду более внимательна и таких ошибок не делать впредь.
milos21 (2023-10-02 10:30:50+00:00): source: Ortofotomozaika SR;LIDAR:ÚGKK SR DMR5.0
doerakpoes (2023-10-02 10:35:53+00:00): Uncertain if specifying a turn restriction was necessary
eggie (2023-10-02 11:21:21+00:00): Dag dp,

Je twijfelt zie ik.. 
Eigenlijk was dat puntstuk juist goed ingetekend, wat je kunt gewoon over verfstrepen heenrijden. Bv hulpdiensten. 
De voorgaande mapper is ervaren. 
Een doorgetrokken streep zou dan een afslagbeperking rechtvaardigen, maar .... waar de straat nu samenkomt kun je gewoon keren. 
Zou in dit soor gevallen geen afslagbeperking zetten.  Wel als doorgetrokken streep verder de hele straat volgt. 

Groet
eggie
doerakpoes (2023-10-02 11:59:40+00:00): Okay
doerakpoes (2023-10-02 12:18:32+00:00): Is er een manier hoe je specifiek de punt locatie terug kan zetten? (de turn restriction is vrij makkelijk om ongedaan te maken in vergelijking)
eggie (2023-10-02 12:52:31+00:00): Gewoon die node pakken met de muis en iets terug plaatsen.. want met de reverter ben je ook je goede toevoegingen kwijt.
doerakpoes (2023-10-02 13:09:52+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142038834
mcliquid (2023-10-05 12:31:39+00:00): Hi,

Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-)

One general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
eggie (2023-10-03 05:19:51+00:00): Welcome to OSM... Why making a motorway here out of a river? 
Your edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=142032914

Not very funny

Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2023-10-03 05:22:15+00:00): reverted by changeset #142079632 due to vandalism
elsy1 (2023-10-02 18:46:40+00:00): باسلام این اقدام شما یعنی خرابکاری و ریپورت شدید
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-12-17 08:53:36+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1066780564/history

note that adding name=Mailbox to all mailboxes or adding name=Building to all building or name=Tree to all trees is not needed :)
macieeejski (2023-10-02 11:14:54+00:00): https://www.odolanow.pl/651,aktualnosci-gminne-2023?tresc=13001

Łącznik drogi gminnej Odolanów - Kaczory otrzymał warstwę asfaltową, a droga otrzymała miano rangi lokalnej dla mieszkańców pobliskich miejscowości
scai (2023-11-05 16:28:06+00:00): Hi,

die Bar BBC war hier bereits eingetragen. Ich entferne daher nun diesen zweiten, doppelten Eintrag.

Grüße
Alex
eggie (2023-10-02 11:36:48+00:00): Oke...
Dat heet schipperen, want het is zoals het is.
Volgens mij liep er laatste en draadje over op het forum, want je bent niet de enige die dat tegenkomt.
In sommige plaatsen neemt de BAG trouwens die dubbele adressen over in de vorm van één adresnode. 

MVG
eggie
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-10-02 11:37:37+00:00): https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/winkel-met-twee-huisnummers-volgens-site/103469
OldManCelli (2023-10-18 01:39:10+00:00): JaneAmerica12 - please be careful. You have duplicated hundreds of buildings in two different changesets
142034772 and 142027375
Is this some kind of import? Just wondering why there are so many duplicate buildings.
empty_child (2023-10-02 12:17:43+00:00): Hello GiorgiG,
Please, don't follow the satellite photos' geometry as a truth: most of these buildings have default square geometry. Just for information: due to the specific of the Earth surface and the orbit of satellites, final photos can have severe geometry alteration. For resolving this case, you need to make reverse alteration to restore correct form. This process names orthorectification. Georgian NAPR has orthorectified photos, but our community couldn't reach any representatives in the way of opening access for OSM. And, currently, the only one way to do it - do it yourself. You need a drone and a PC with a lot of RAM
wireguy (2023-10-03 01:36:19+00:00): Mr. Matt, can you recheck Union relation, it's getting validation errors.   Relation role of outer should be all lowercase.  There seems to be breaks in the relations too.
Mr Matt K (2023-10-03 02:42:06+00:00): the "Outers" have been fixed, not sure exactly how to check the broken relations you're seeing
wireguy (2023-10-03 10:50:13+00:00): Thanks for fixing the outers.   josm has better tools to edit/validate relations.   

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-75.74150&lat=39.50692&zoom=8&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=ring_not_closed

The broken relation was fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142089725
eggie (2023-10-02 12:03:28+00:00): Lijkt me oke zo.
gr eggie
fititnt (2023-11-22 16:17:09+00:00): Olá UPegasus.

Você não tem pouca experiência, e deveria saber dohttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history , em especial ao lidar com pontos de interesse importantes.

Veja  https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2154562427/history . O correto é mover as tags do nó para algum elemento que permanece no objeto final. Até mesmo no iD é possível copiar manualmente as tags, e o JOSM tem funcionalidade dedicada de fazer esse tipo de operação (que no mínimo move as tags, mesmo que não o faça com as geometrias).

Favor, mais cuidado nas próximas edições, para manter o histórico do trabalho dos voluntários do passado.
jmsbert (2023-12-27 20:06:52+00:00): Olá UPegasus,
eu agora estou re-validando uns projetos de HOT em Brasil e descubri as modificações no hospital em Encantado. Eu suporte totalmente a argumentacao de fitinit. Eu agora restorei a história do node 2154562427, e integrei-o no conture de l'hospital.

Hello UPegasus,
I am currently re-validating some HOT projects in Brazil and discovered the modifications to the hospital in Encantado. I fully support fitinit's argument. I have now restored the history of the node 2154562427, and integrated it into the conture de l'hospital.