piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
habi (2025-10-22 06:55:21+00:00): Ciao CH GPS Tracker

Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap!
Schön machst du hier mit und hilfst, die Karte und die Kartendaten zu pflegen.

Du hast hier ein paar Dinge geändert, die ich gerne präzisieren würde:

- Bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/190509405 hast du eine Ecke gelöscht, das habe ich in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173611394 wiederhergestellt. Ist das Gebäude mit 'Troll' angeschrieben?
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/645372083 *ist* ein Bienenhaus und *heisst* nicht Bienenhaus, oder? Ich würde das als https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:man_made%3Dbeehive erfassen. Das habe ich in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173611676 gemacht
- Du hast https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1443677380 als 'Reservoir' erfasst. Wenn ich den Katasterplan Bern und die swisstopo Luftfotos anschaue, dann ist das aus meiner Sicht eher ein https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:man_made%3Dreservoir_covered Ich habe das mal in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173611821 so erfasst. Aufgrund der swisstopo Fotos sieht es so aus, als wäre das Reservoir im Untergrund. Wenn das so ist, könnte noch ein `location=underground` hinzugefügt werden.
- Du hast https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1443677381 hinzugefügt. In OpenStreetMap werden Namen eher nicht als Abkürzung eingegeben. Was heisst 'Spl' ausgeschrieben?

Ä liebe Gruess usem Liebifäud,
habi


PS: Bei irgendwelchen Fragen gerne hier in den Kommentaren nachhaken oder bei https://c.osm.org/c/107 eine Diskussion eröffnen, wir versuchen gerne zu helfen.
wies1 (2025-10-21 11:04:45+00:00): Fehler bei source:

Richtig:

Buildings and addresses

GWR Swisstopo 2025
Dušan Kreheľ (2025-10-21 11:08:45+00:00): Source map of terain: DTM 5.0 shading of Slovakia
pitscheplatsch (2025-10-21 13:48:22+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM.

Should be reviewed by the local community.

Best regards, 
Pascal
VA00 (2026-07-22 19:22:17+00:00): Operatorem są Drezyny Regulice, nie PKP PLK
Anas masuris (2026-07-23 09:49:41+00:00): Sprawdziłem w rejestrze i nadal widnieje tam PKP PLK (dla innych kolei drezynowych jest wyróżnienie np. Nadzalewowa Kolej Drezynowa dla LK254 (Kamienica Elbląska - Frombork) lub WSS Teodoryk dla LK208 (odc. Lidzbark Miasto - Klonowo k. Lidzbarka)).

Chyba, że masz jaką inną dokumentację, to chętnie przejrzę
VA00 (2026-07-23 12:20:35+00:00): Chodziło mi o samą stację https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9583408009
Anas masuris (2026-07-23 12:33:12+00:00): Trzeba było od razu powiedzieć, że chodzi o stację - tak, jej nie ma w rejestrze PKP PLK, więc się zgodzę. Zaraz zmienię
eggie (2025-10-21 12:17:44+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
BCNorwich (2025-10-21 13:41:00+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I've reinstated the Public Right of Way as it is still a highway no matter its state of repair. There looks like there is a gap in the central crash barrier to allow for crossing.

 What you could do is contact Suffolk County Council and complain about the state of repair of the highway.

Levington Heath, both sides of the A14, is Open Access Land, so you are allowed open access on foot to the whole area; it's on the Ordnance Survey map.

Regards Bernard.
mavl (2025-11-15 10:56:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 174681717 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
trial (2025-10-21 16:26:01+00:00): Merci.
man_made=pier
floating=yes

J'aurais plutôt mis 
was:man_made=pier -il n'est plus utilisable comme tel)
historic=wreck
seamark:type=wreck
seamark:wreck:category=hull_showing
wreck:visible_at_low_tide=yes
floating, pas sûr, si ?
wreck:visible_at_high_tide=yes ?
Et je n'aurais pas coupé les coins à l'est, je suppose qu'ils sont juste cachés.
trial (2025-10-22 21:36:17+00:00): Je pense que ton clavier a dérapé : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1239462884 ;-)
Fabe56 (2025-10-26 19:50:39+00:00): Corrigé, merci ;)
NeisBot (2025-10-21 11:33:42+00:00): Just to help illustrate what I mean, here is how your description could look in a more neutral, factual form: "Autocentre in Strood offering vehicle services"
NeisBot (2025-10-21 11:33:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
jrstubbs (2025-10-21 12:29:25+00:00): Apologies, was my first contribution, and I pulled that straight from Google. Will amend now.
NeisReview (2025-10-26 10:19:12+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/173580026
TinPetreković (2025-10-24 08:24:49+00:00): Maxweight tag fixed in 173705667

Changed from maxweight:hgv:conditional to maxweigh:conditional

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173705667
habi (2025-10-22 07:12:36+00:00): Ciao
Hier hast du die obere Gantrischhütte komplett gelöscht.
Diese ist auf den swisstopo Fotos noch zu sehen, ich nehme mal an, dass diese noch existiert.
Deshalb habe ich die Hütte in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173612406 wiederhergestellt.
Habi
habi (2025-10-22 07:13:54+00:00): PS:  Und (wie schon in einem anderen Changeset kommentiert), was heisst 'Spl'? Wohl Schiessplatz, oder? Auf den Orthofotos ist nichts zu erkennen, das daraufhin hinweisen könnte.
CH GPS Tracker (2025-10-22 12:40:28+00:00): Tschou habi, 
Danke für die Rückanpassung bei Gantrischhütte, da kam bei mir dauernd eine Fehlermeldung.
Spl ist die offizielle militärische (CH) Bezeichung für Schiessplatz und für Spaziergänger/Biker schon noch relevant, dass dies bezeichnet ist. In swisstopo ist wenigstens der Spl Chirel als solcher angegeben.
habi (2025-10-22 15:05:16+00:00): Ah klar, Schiessplatz. Dann würde ich das aber ausschreiben, und nach https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:military%3Drange zusätzlich noch mit `military=range` erfassen.
Kannst du das noch machen?
FajrAl (2025-10-21 11:57:36+00:00): Much obliged
literan (2025-10-21 19:55:31+00:00): не надо капсов и описаний в поле name
eggie (2025-10-21 12:23:45+00:00): Dag Gert,
review_requested 	yes
Wanneer dat zo is dan is de aanpassing correct.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-10-21 12:21:31+00:00): Dag Martijn   name= heb ik omgezet naar note=   Tijdelijke doorsteek De Baandert/ De Velst


.. name alleen gebruiken voor officiële (straat)namen. 

MVG
eggie
FajrAl (2025-10-21 11:52:08+00:00): Appreciated, truly.
aboc (2025-10-22 15:45:56+00:00): Ciao, ho revertato le modifiche ai nomi delle vie. Per standard OSM i nomi di persona con numerale ordinale vanno scritti per esteso. Il numerale può essere indicato con i numeri romani su alt_name per mantenere l'indicizzabilità

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173634642
SekeRob (2025-10-25 08:28:41+00:00): And there I thought that 'proposed' in mapping was frowned upon and following the news, I'd say most very iffy. OTOH, since it's 'proposed' can't see how this would affect any aerial routing planning as seems to be argued. There's physically nothing there to avoid.
Taya_S (2025-10-25 12:22:12+00:00): Well, I do agree with you. I'm not a fan of proposed features getting mapped. As it stands right now, it is more or less up to each local community to decide whether they want proposed objects or not.

If you've got anything specifically against this railway here, I suggest discussing it in this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173518712
bxl-forever (2025-10-21 12:31:07+00:00): Thanks for this.

One-way only for cars or is there an exemption for cyclists (M2) or cyclists+moped A (M3) here?

https://www.wegcode.be/nl/regelgeving/1975120109~hra8v386pu#yhm2tnd9wa
duvrai_ (2025-10-21 14:08:18+00:00): There is an exemption for fietsers and bromfietsen A (M3)
bxl-forever (2025-10-21 16:52:17+00:00): OK, thanks.  The reason I asked is that once "oneway=yes" is set on a road, navigation software will see it as a one-way street even for cyclists.  We use additional tags when we have such exemptions.

I fixed your edit: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1092017457

Have a nice day.
Gregory Peony (2025-10-25 03:26:56+00:00): Good go at trying to map the large building here, but always ensure that your edits agree with the latest imagery. Check the bottom right to see what imagery you're looking at when editing.  You can see how I mapped it in Changeset: 173740593 I also decided to map it as one building.
aTarom (2025-10-29 14:26:05+00:00): Hola, gracias por editar, revisa cuando cambies los nombres, los respectivos name:ca o name:es si existen para que cuadren, en el de esta edición, por ejemplo, el name:ca debe coincidir con el name.
Saludos
PRIMAstmp25 (2025-10-30 06:17:35+00:00): Vale, lo voy a tener en cuenta para las siguientes. Muchísimas gracias por tus comentarios
foreigner037 (2025-10-22 07:42:20+00:00): Hi,

please keep changesets smaller:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
Gregory Peony (2025-10-29 03:24:25+00:00): Hi, it looks like you applied an invalid layer tag here. Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer to better understand its use.
conri (2025-10-21 12:23:46+00:00): The GR34 is closed since 17.03.2017.
Sylabowy Kot (2025-10-21 12:26:37+00:00): Z powodu użycia gorszej jakości zdjęć, w przyszłości będzie można doszukać się miejsc do poprawek. 

Na pewno trzeba będzie ogarnąć dziwny podział barier na północnym wschodzie - blacha falista i płot zostały po zakończeniu budowy?
frydzio (2025-10-21 13:23:52+00:00): Jeśli chodzi o ogrodzenie z blachy falistej to jest tam zaplecze budowy dla osiedla Tarasy II - to ten sam deweloper. Trudno jednak bez widoku z góry ocenić jaki teren jest tam zajęty.
kartler175 (2025-11-15 11:36:27+00:00): Please check the outcome of your edits and fix iit if necessary: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-74.09536&lat=46.05410&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.95&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways
Xxr914 (2025-10-21 13:01:15+00:00): It exist
Dimitar155 (2025-10-22 09:24:11+00:00): Пред бл. 25 няма спирка. Може би е имало някога, но към днешна дата не съществува (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13247793828).

Номерата на блоковете са отбелязани в адреса, не е необходимо да се дублира същата информация в името. Още повече имайки предвид че това не е име. Име би било "блок Родопи", но в София няма много именувани блокове. В Русе обаче са доста.
wombatmaper (2025-10-21 13:20:02+00:00): Archie, jag har återigen återställt din vandalism av spårvagnslinjen Brunssbo och Lindholmen. Var vänlig delta i diskussionen i communityn innan du raderar objekt i stor skala.

Archie, I have once again reverted your vandalism of the Brunssbo and Lindholmen tram line. Please engage in community discussion before mass deleting objects.
JPhoenix11 (2025-10-21 13:47:25+00:00): Hej Wombat, sträckningen till Brunnsbo har en hyfsat detaljerad plan och kommer att börja byggas snart. Därför anser iallafall jag att den är konkret nog att läggas till på kartan. Lindholmsförbindelsen har däremot ingen färdigställd järnvägs- eller detaljplan för någon del av sträckningen. Därför är den inritade sträckningen endast en – om än klok – gissning. De första revisionerna kommer enligt plan att kunna granskas snart, antagligen senare i år. Då bör denna sträckning ritas in. Som den är inritad nu är inget som hög hemma på OSM, tyvärr. Jag kommer inte att ta bort den, då detta fram-och-tillbaka-redigerandet är tramsigt. Jag rekommenderar även att du och Archie inte ändrar något förrän konsensus har uppnåtts.
wombatmaper (2025-10-21 14:00:24+00:00): Jag håller definitivt med om rutten till Brunnsbo.
Jag tror dock att Lindholm-förbindelsen också kan kartläggas, men vi kan kanske fortsätta den diskussionen här: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173539410#map=13/57.71014/11.95425

Archie har aldrig ens diskuterat rutten till Brunnsbo och återgick utan någon form av samråd. Utifrån tidigare erfarenheter tvivlar jag på att de kommer att delta i någon form av konstruktiv diskussion, men vi kan alltid hoppas.
eggie (2025-10-21 14:35:22+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Fyris (2025-12-27 20:18:51+00:00): Även om den inte fastställts på metern när, är det hyfsat klart var banan ska gå och jag ser ingen anledning till varför den informationen inte ska kunna vara med på kartan.
rempshaener (2025-10-22 18:35:11+00:00): Hallo,
ich habe einige Anmerkungen zu deinen Bearbeitungen.

Adresse:
Hydranten haben keine Adresse im Sinne des addr:*-Schemas.
Dass überhaupt Adressen an Hydranten erfasst werden, ist zumindest nicht unstrittig.
Sofern das unumgänglich ist, erfolgt dies mittels object:*-Schema, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:object:*
Für den Fall, dass du dies umsetzt, dazu folgender Hinweis:
„16/18“ ist kein zulässiger Wert für addr:housenumber.

Kupplungen:
Das Feld „couplings“ bleibt bei Unterflurhydranten leer, da es sich um die „Angabe der vorhandenen Anzahl an Schlauchanschlüssen“ handelt, siehe osm.wiki/DE:Key:couplings?uselang=de. Unterflurhydranten haben in der Regel nur mit Standrohr eine Schlauchkupplung.
Insofern sind auch die Angaben
couplings:diameters=Standrohr B;B
couplings:type=Standrohr
falsch. Bitte löschen.

Name:
Hydranten haben keinen Namen.
In diesem Fall sind die Daten auch verzichtbar, da vollständig redundant.

Geometrie:
Hydranten sollten nicht mit Straßen, Gebäuden u. ä. verbunden werden. Das lässt sich leicht beheben: in  iD z. B. markieren und „E“ drücken – das löst den Hydranten von der Linie.

Viele Grüße
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-22 02:34:26+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/375448652

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-22 02:54:49+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/375448652

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eggie (2025-10-21 14:20:43+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
kubahahaha (2025-12-22 20:10:35+00:00): Te ulice nie mają nazw

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5100287
VLD549 (2025-11-05 15:24:09+00:00): Hi, I was asked to verify name changes. I have seen many 'Voetwegen' over time, but never a Voetweg starting with an 'A'. :)
Could you provide a link of some sort that shows it to be A82?

Thank you!
Kamerijker (2025-11-05 16:34:35+00:00): The A for the foot way refers to the “ Atlas van trage wegen” as many other foot ways in the area.
Kamerijker (2025-11-05 16:52:00+00:00): This is the link
https://tragewegen.github.io/trage-wegen-in-je-buurt/?logo=true&lyrs=trw&base=osm&histo=abw&histTrans=0.7&x=4.278202&y=50.717401&z=17.29
eggie (2025-10-21 14:22:42+00:00): Dag Roel,

Dan lijkt me access=yes niet de meest correcte tag.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=173582291

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-10-21 14:23:25+00:00): access=yes verwijderd
Roel Janken (2025-10-30 09:38:22+00:00): Dag eggie. Dit was mijn eerste wijziging en ik wilde m graag gereviewed hebben. Dank.

Doel: reisplanners als Waze en Google Maps leren deze weg nooit in te plannen of gebruik te maken van mogelijkheid om ontheffing op te geven

mvg,
Roel
eggie (2025-10-30 10:00:27+00:00): Dag Roel,

In OSRM routeert het gewoon wat eigenlijk niet de bedoeling is.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_car&route=51.869665%2C5.853846%3B51.873282%2C5.850375#map=17/51.871480/5.852151

In andere OSM routeplanners als Valhalla en GraphHopper routeert het terecht niet. Die kunnen dan wel met permit omgaan.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_car&route=51.87327%2C5.85031%3B51.87051%2C5.85301#map=14/51.87538/5.85253

MVG
eggie
evgenykatyshev (2025-10-21 14:44:00+00:00): I revert it because you have again moved buildings along badly aligned imagery of Bing

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173586627
notmyproblem1 (2025-10-22 12:30:22+00:00): maxspeed=https://www.letteraemme.it/pillole-di-ponte-a-che-velocita-viaggeranno-i-treni-da-faro-a-messina-e-viceversa/


so I can go at https kmh? xD

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1421236851
AurélienQ (2025-10-22 14:27:56+00:00): I saw it too : )
But I'm not at the origine of this tag. My last change wasn't about this subject, so I didn't correct this tag because I've been too lazy to do it.
evgenykatyshev (2025-10-21 14:42:44+00:00): I revert it because you have again moved buildings along badly aligned imagery of Bing

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173586541
evgenykatyshev (2025-10-21 14:38:09+00:00): I revert it because yes have again moved buildings along badly aligned imagery of Bing

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173586292
coteyka (2025-10-22 14:56:07+00:00): It doesn't seems like updating the surfaces
Danil Moiseenko (2025-10-22 17:07:40+00:00): Next time, please give more exact description of your changeset so other users can understand what you added, removed or changed.
Happy mapping!
fortera_au (2025-10-23 20:54:03+00:00): I'm just wondering what the source for the change is, or if there was a discussion? For quite a while, name has been United States, int_name is United States of America.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173583310
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-11-12 02:59:29+00:00): How were you able to edit it when I can't? It's not like there's anything I can do to edit it again since this one relation is so big.
silversurfer83 (2025-11-13 08:44:37+00:00): Dear Flap,

You received many comments that asked you to please first talk before you change "big" things. I believe the Name of the US is part of that.
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-11-14 19:36:02+00:00): I didn't make any changes to the US relation. That was done by someone else; I tried to revert it, but the changeset was too big. The common name for the country that I live in is "United States" (and was like that for a while until some user changed it to "United States of America"), while the official name is "United States of America."
silversurfer83 (2025-11-14 20:18:00+00:00): I am aware of that. I tried to take the opportunity to get your attention since there were some recent CS by you that fit what I said
Victor Dps (2025-11-29 13:55:27+00:00): Hello, I took the liberty of clarifying the name by adding the "of America" ​​at the end, taking the full and official name of the country. If necessary, I can restore the old name "United States"
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-11-29 17:27:17+00:00): Yes please. We already have "official_name" for that situation, though I will say that adding "of America" might be useful for disambiguation purposes (like United Mexican States or United Republic of Tanzania), but this country is commonly referred to as the United States.
Victor Dps (2025-11-29 20:42:56+00:00): I just tried changing the name back to "United States" but I'm having a problem with the download and it won't complete. Maybe you could do it ? To do this, simply change the name in the codes tab with "name = ..."
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-11-30 20:13:42+00:00): I tried but was unable to because of the huge bounding box size. I've emailed DWG about this, so I'll update them with this info.
Glassman (2025-11-30 20:38:06+00:00): Name changed back to United States
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173583310
SomeoneElse2 (2025-10-25 12:20:08+00:00): Hello,
This introduced a gap in https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/23406 .  I've filled it in in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173753564 .
Best Regards,
Andy
Fizzie-DWG (2025-11-05 02:26:24+00:00): DWG revert - apparent fictitious road

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174220021
Fizzie-DWG (2025-11-05 02:49:27+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18923
osmviborg (2025-10-21 14:10:50+00:00): Blokeringen er flyttet små 150m længere mod vest, er tydelig på ortofoto.
b-holdet (2025-10-21 15:49:29+00:00): https://aabenindsigt.syddjurs.dk/sag/23/31826
JoaoPaixao (2025-10-22 10:35:03+00:00): Boa tarde,

porque removeste estes elementos?
1427933894
1427933895
Sendo que foram criados com imagem de 2021 e as imagens mais recentes 2023 ainda comprovam o mesmo estado.

Obrigado
Reino Baptista (2025-10-22 12:17:23+00:00): Olá, João Paixão,

As áreas com a tag natural=wood que eram anteriormente cobertas por esses elementos passaram a estar incluídas numa área mais ampla, também classificada como natural=wood. A alteração resultou apenas do aviso de sobreposição de áreas (landuse) com a mesma classificação de tags, detetado aquando da publicação da minha edição.  
Se essas áreas possuíssem outros atributos (por exemplo, name, leaf_cycle ou leaf_type), teria optado por mantê-las. Presumo que, ao visualizares esse local no mapa OpenStreetMap Carto, ainda não tivesse ocorrido a renderização dos novos elementos em todas as escalas.

Ao dispôr,
RB
Reino Baptista (2025-10-22 12:20:51+00:00): P.S.
A nova área wood é:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19738965
eggie (2025-10-21 14:25:25+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  Wat is dit voor een enorm gebouw in een beschermd natuurgebied?
Gebouwen worden overigens periodiek geïmporteerd vanuit de BAG (Kadaster)
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-10-21 14:34:42+00:00): reverted by changeset #173586063

Voorlopig teruggedraaid in afwachting van reactie
extua (2025-10-22 11:59:56+00:00): well mapped!
gmar5 (2025-10-22 18:18:35+00:00): Thanks. Mostly from a quick glance! I need to take a few pictures of the remaining areas.
Rodrigo Rega (2025-10-25 01:22:59+00:00): Hola.

El comentario de este conjunto de cambios no es lo suficientemente descriptivo para que el resto de usuarios se hagan una idea de cuáles han sido los elementos que se han editado. Por favor, consulta la siguiente página para saber como hacer comentarios que faciliten el trabajo de revisión de ediciones: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenos_comentarios_en_conjuntos_de_cambios

Gracias por tus aportes a OpenStreetMap.

Un saludo.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173584672
Rodrigo Rega (2025-10-25 16:17:40+00:00): Hola.

¿Por qué se ha eliminado la etiqueta de museo?

Un saludo.
Rodrigo Rega (2025-11-15 16:36:29+00:00): Tras no haber recibido contestación he procedido a recuperar las etiquetas eliminadas.