piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
RedGreenBlue09 (2025-11-03 21:45:45+00:00): Street nào bạn gửi tôi xem với. Street view của tôi ở đâu người ta cũng ghi Kha Vạn Cân

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=10.870200564592949&lng=106.76353387234008&z=18.234465931250337&pKey=730504919046781&x=0.6745081454888271&y=0.432063922801173&zoom=1.118251936712555&focus=photo

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=10.870403770811976&lng=106.76354559880997&z=18.234465931250337&pKey=298161515953999&x=0.5481503100580594&y=0.41619767328527474&zoom=1.118251936712555&focus=photo

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=10.870574409520046&lng=106.76356858732993&z=18.234465931250337&pKey=276428871678847&x=0.5545671916293744&y=0.4369300472777182&zoom=1.118251936712555&focus=photo
RedGreenBlue09 (2025-11-03 22:01:28+00:00): Đường Phạm Văn Đồng là đường mới từ năm 2013. Còn Kha Vạn Cân đã có từ lâu và nó nối vào Ngã Tư Linh Xuân.

https://thuvienphapluat.vn/van-ban/Giao-thong-Van-tai/Quyet-dinh-568-QD-TTg-nam-2013-Dieu-chinh-Quy-hoach-phat-trien-giao-thong-181044.aspx
AndyB_66 (2025-11-03 21:12:52+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
user_5359 (2025-11-05 07:29:41+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/970310611. Did you really mean access=no?
Julysfire (2025-11-03 19:51:34+00:00): Ways that have added nodes have these tags: [('building/silo', 169), ('building/yes', 165), ('natural/tree_row', 58), ('landuse/residential', 40), ('landuse/farmland', 32), ('landuse/farmyard', 21), ('waterway/ditch', 14), ('barrier/fence', 9), ('layer/-1', 6), ('tunnel/culvert', 6), ('leisure/pitch', 4), ('sport/baseball', 4), ('landuse/meadow', 3), ('highway/tertiary', 3), ('natural/water', 3), ('natural/wood', 2), ('access/private', 2), ('leisure/swimming_pool', 2), ('location/outdoor', 2), ('swimming_pool/personal', 2), ('name/West 500 North', 2), ('natural/grassland', 2), ('type/multipolygon', 2), ('waterway/stream', 1), ('alt_name/East Oxford Street', 1), ('name/East Oxford Street', 1), ('bridge/yes', 1), ('layer/1', 1)]

Ways that were modified had these tags: [('landuse/farmland', 12), ('highway/unclassified', 6), ('highway/service', 5), ('name/East 900 South;East 1100 North', 3), ('highway/tertiary', 2), ('access/private', 2), ('surface/paved', 2), ('surface/gravel', 2), ('tiger:name_type_2/Rd', 2), ('name/Little Pine Creek', 2), ('waterway/stream', 2), ('building/yes', 2), ('alt_name/East Oxford Street', 1), ('bridge/yes', 1), ('layer/1', 1), ('name/East Oxford Street', 1), ('name/North 850 West', 1), ('test/test', 1), ('highway/residential', 1), ('name/West County Line Road', 1), ('oneway/no', 1), ('addr:city/Otterbein', 1), ('addr:housenumber/208', 1), ('addr:postcode/47970', 1), ('addr:state/IN', 1), ('addr:street/South Church Street', 1), ('leisure/pitch', 1), ('name/Otterbein Baseball Fields', 1), ('sport/baseball', 1), ('name/West 750 North', 1), ('highway/track', 1), ('name/West 500 North', 1), ('natural/wood', 1), ('access/yes', 1), ('name/West 850 North', 1)]
faian36 (2025-11-04 13:02:18+00:00): Mir ist gerade aufgefallen, dass einige der Straßen hier wohl eher "surface=chipseal" statt "asphalt" sind. Werde ich so bald wie möglich aktualisieren.
Andrea Musuruane (2025-11-04 08:13:50+00:00): Your tagging of wikidata and wikipedia is not correct. Wikidata was fine before your edit. I'm gonna revert this. BR, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174164440
user_5359 (2025-11-05 08:16:13+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1447224023. What is the mean of the tag CHANGEDIS = living_street?
ivandhfr (2025-11-05 09:38:32+00:00): @user_5359 Whoops, sorry... That was an oversight on my part. It was a placeholder; I should’ve removed it before uploading.

Fixed now: Changeset 174231564
eggie (2025-11-03 21:10:09+00:00): Dag Gemirt, 

Je vraagt feedback.. Lijkt me oke. Er zit ligt nogn pitch volgens mij zonder sport=.. ?
De clubs kunnen evt op de clubgebouwen. 
MVG
eggie
AndyB_66 (2025-11-03 21:11:27+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
eggie (2025-11-03 20:21:37+00:00): Vast Vroege Vogels gekeken? :)
padvinder (2025-11-10 23:26:48+00:00): Ja en jij blijkbaar ook
rivermont (2025-12-05 03:21:02+00:00): Please be careful about just clicking the buttons in iD editor. The entirety of Bent Creek Road is not a bridge.
AndyB_66 (2025-11-03 21:11:58+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
eserte (2025-11-12 12:58:50+00:00): Hi Emil,

ich habe das Fahrradstraße-Tagging wieder rückgängig gemacht. Die Fahrradstraße ist noch nicht ausgeschildert. Mapillary-Bilder werden gerade hochgeladen.

-- Slaven
Emil1887 (2025-11-12 13:13:16+00:00): Alles klar, hab Fotos gesehen mit fertig markierten Z244.1 auf der Fahrbahn. Das sah abgeschlossen und vollständig aus.
eserte (2025-11-12 13:17:15+00:00): Es gibt nur weiße Rechtecke auf der Fahrbahn. Mapillary-Fotos dazu werden gerade hochgeladen.
eserte (2025-11-12 13:55:22+00:00): https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&pKey=614894774980002&x=0.3767&y=0.5979&zoom=1.0896
herr_horst22 (2025-11-03 20:26:45+00:00): Weiter Quelle Flussübergang Brandspick: https://www.komoot.com/de-de/highlight/6486791
eggie (2025-11-03 21:11:58+00:00): Dag  Xyberion,

Routerelaties aanpassen kun je beter met editor JOSM.
Met iD gaat dat wel eens verkeerd.
Die editor kan niet met relaties omgaan?
MVG
eggie
dvdhoven (2025-11-04 08:02:08+00:00): Ik heb alles hersteld.
Routes en knooppunten moeten lid gemaakt worden van het netwerk.
Er stond een rwn_ref 81, die moest 83 zijn
Zie ook https://knooppuntnet.nl/nl/analysis/changeset/174165381/6842402
Xyberion (2025-11-04 15:56:17+00:00): Hoi dvdhoven,

Bedankt voor het herstellen van de routenetwerken. Ik zie in de changesets die je gemaakt hebt, dat je relatie 80-83 hebt toegevoegd aan het Netwerk Deurne en dat je de rwn_ref hebt aangepast.
Klopt het dat je verder geen aanpassingen hebt gedaan en kan ik daaruit afleiden dat ik wel op deze manier een goed functionerende/routerende relatie (rwn 80-83) kan creëren?

Groet,
Wouter
dvdhoven (2025-11-04 16:12:15+00:00): Hallo Wouter,

Alles is orde nu. Ik heb ook die knoop 81 naar 83 gewijzigd en daarmee zijn de routes ook in orde.
https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#routelist?map=15.0/51.4551/5.8434

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
jkoe (2025-12-07 22:59:10+00:00): Ist DB Lounge wirklich die Marke? 

Ich hatte die Berichterstattung [1] so verstanden, dass das einfach ein offener Wartebereich ist, und ja ein neues Konzept (war also wahrscheinlich vor einem Monat nicht zu erkennen). Auch beim Vorbeigehen haben die Schilder gewirkt, als wäre die Marke „DB Wartebereich“.

Interessanterweise sind die DB Lounges als amenity=cafe gemappt. Ich weiß nicht warum. Ich halte dieses Objekt für einen Präzedenzfall für neue Objekte dieses Typs (sind schon angekündigt). 

Ich bin eigentlich der Meinung, dass amenity=lounge auf beide zutreffen würde. Die unterscheidung scheint mir v.a. über die brand=* sinnvoll zu sein. Ich vermute mal per Hausordnung wird access=customers sein, was allerdings auf die DB Lounge auch zutrifft.

[1] https://merkurist.de/mainz/deutsche-bahn-neuer-wartebereich-mit-cafe-am-mainzer-hauptbahnhof_6QCU
jkoe (2025-12-12 17:32:57+00:00): Ich habe es mir heute nochmal angeschaut, das ist auf jeden Fall keine DB Lounge. 

Nachdem ich mir das angeschaut habe und sehe meine Vermutungen bestätigt. Ich passe das mal dahingehend an ubd ergänze beschreibungen.. Bezüglich amenity=* bin ich mir aber unsicher.
NewChest (2025-11-03 21:52:13+00:00): Hallo "i know this place"

Mir ist aufgefallen, dass du einige Gebäudeumrisse anhand der Dachform nachgezeichnet hast. In OpenStreetMap sollten Gebäude jedoch immer nach ihrer Grundfläche (also dem Umriss am Boden) erfasst werden, nicht nach der Dachform oder den Dachüberständen, das ist ein absolutes No go. 

Viele Grüße
NewChest.
Comino (2025-11-03 21:09:43+00:00): You are using the wrong tags and syntax. Please read my DM's on Discord.

payment:square:bitcoin=yes
mnpezz (2025-11-03 21:31:58+00:00): i have been using payment:square:bitcoin=yes

it looks like mueschel changed it to payment:lightning:operator=square
Aleksandar Matejevic (2025-11-04 21:51:13+00:00): Hi homesteadrv, 
I see that you have added lot numbers for The Board Walk Mobile Home Park. It looks like lot 706 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/522608062 is on the wrong building. This one should be 707, and 709 is missing, so you might have made a mistake here form 701 to 710. Per this map https://boardwalkrv.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Map-1.jpg it looks like you have started 701 where is a lot 702. Can you please double check this and update?
AndyB_66 (2025-11-03 21:09:39+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
yrtimiD (2025-11-04 00:09:42+00:00): Hello and welcome! Thanks for your contribution!

Having sidewalks mapped is not bad at all. We do want to help routing services to create appropriate route for pedestrians. There are several ways to map them (and it's always recommended to firstly check  osm wiki for specific feature, there are tons of details and I promise, you'll discover new nuances even after 10 years of mapping)

So, jump to "How to map" on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sidewalks

in most cases the rule is simple: if sidewalk is adjoined to the highway and goes along the whole way part - just add sidewalk=left/right/both on the highway - super easy and fast method. if sidewalk has a different shape, not adjoined to the highway (like, there are trees or grass between sidewalk and the road), or there is also a bicycle way or you like micro-mapping - feel free to draw sidewalk as a separate footway (as it was mapped here).

so, specifically in this case your edit removed existing (good) feature without replacing it with any alternative - not good. please either restore these separate sidewalks or map them on the directly on  the highway.

I'd also recommend looking into our dedicated page with special local rules: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Israel
there you'll also find other ways to connect with the community. feel free to ask if anything is unclear.
noam15A (2025-11-04 13:25:51+00:00): Thank you for the detailed feedback! I fixed everything.
AndyB_66 (2025-11-03 21:09:14+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
Jaska Korhonen (2025-11-06 13:56:31+00:00): Hi! You changed the geometry of Mosa ägoväg but the path (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1443098156) was connected to the Botnia SnowRiders track so routing was broken. Should the SnowRiders track be fixed as well? It crosses the ägoväg a couple of times...
Jaska Korhonen (2025-11-06 13:58:30+00:00): and yes, I fixed the routing issue with the path... Not much on Strava heatmap but I have a feeling I've been running there a couple of times, I'll go check it out over the weekend if I can find the time
AndyB_66 (2025-11-03 21:08:41+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
ForestFurnace (2025-11-03 21:10:33+00:00): Irvine, CA: Changing Shady Canyon Trail from "bicycle: mtb" back to "bicycle: yes". "mtb" is not a valid OSM value here and the path surface is already set to dirt. Changing Shady Canyon Trail paved branch back to "bicycle: designated" because there are bicycle symbols on the signs next to the trail and City of Irvine classifies it as an "Off-Street Bikeway".
salma_ayman (2025-11-04 09:37:05+00:00): Hello Abdullah Al Werfalli,
Thank you for your contributions to OpenStreetMap. Could you please share the sources you've used to open those segments of road here:
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1434396722
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1434396720
My latest imagery (dated 19/10/2025) shows that this location is still under construction.
Kind regards,
salma_ayman
muralito (2025-11-04 00:58:53+00:00): Hola. No se que quisiste mapear, pero no esta bien. La etiqueta amenity=place_of_worship es para iglesias y templos de otras religiones, no para territorios.
muralito (2025-11-04 01:00:32+00:00): Y el building=yes tambien, es para edificaciones individuales.
flohoff (2025-11-06 09:10:28+00:00): Moin,
ist dein changeset kommentar oder die änderung falsch? Das ist ja kein "minor change" sondern hat zu großflächigen Routingänderungen geführt.

Beispiel:

https://osm.zz.de/routeqa/?rid=1133954,1145776#51.84626,7.25488,15z

Und für 4 Wochen etwas so zu sperren ist eher so - "mäh" - denn für die die jetzt einen update der Kartendaten machen ist das eher dann ein Jahr kaputt oder so.

Diskussion im Forum ging ja mal das alles unter 8-12 Wochen eher nicht einzutragen ist.

Und bei so gravierenden änderungen am besten auch einen Note auf machen das da jemand dran denkt und das sieht. (Das mache ich jetzt mal)

Flo
chris66 (2025-11-06 09:16:37+00:00): Hi, ja sorry für den Kommentar, war ursprünglich nur ein minor change aber dann ist da noch was dazu gekommen. :)

Zur Sperrung: Diese habe ich nach vorort-Survey eingetragen, geht noch bis Ende November.

access:conditional hat sich ja leider noch nicht bei allen Navis durchgesetzt.
flohoff (2025-11-06 09:20:31+00:00): Das conditional ist ja noch gefährlicher - dann trägt da jemand was von "bis november" ein und jeden november ist es kaputt.

Ich bin immer ein großer freund von "EXPLIZIT UND GANZ LAUT" kaputt machen - so das man es auch in der Karte sieht mit highway=construction 

Ich finde halt jede woche zeugs das Monate über dem Baustellen ende hinaus noch gesperrt ist weil es einfach keiner gefunden hat "so aus versehen".

Es gibt kein wiedervorlagesystem bei OSM, also wird es dem Glück überlassen das es wieder entfernt wird. 

Deshalb - möglichst groß und Bunt kaputt machen.

Flo
❤️‍🔥 (2025-11-07 08:43:52+00:00): Hi, please see  https://osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments , if you type nonsense into the textbox then everyone has to waste their time checking exactly what you changed
Frans S (2025-11-11 10:26:05+00:00): Hello.
When you map hedges, please add a gap 
where it crosses a road. (GPS driven NAV systems cannot deal with that. 
Best regards
NeisBot (2025-11-03 22:24:47+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisBot (2025-11-03 22:24:48+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Stormart Studio grafika i strony internetowe"
NeisBot (2025-11-03 22:24:52+00:00): Na przykład, bardziej neutralna i obiektywna wersja Twojego opisu mogłaby brzmieć: "Stormart Studio grafika i strony internetowe"
---
(Auto-translation)
StormArtStudio (2025-11-04 09:44:29+00:00): poprawione
NeisReview (2025-11-08 22:03:37+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/174183602
NeisBot (2025-11-03 22:27:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisBot (2025-11-03 22:27:42+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Law office in Reno NV"
NeisReview (2025-11-08 22:02:30+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/174179188
stoerte (2025-11-12 10:19:06+00:00): Huhu, erstmal vielen Dank für dein Engagement auf OpenStreetMap!

Mit welchem Hintergrund veränderst du die Staatsstraßen also (S xxx) von highway=secondary zu highway=residential? Auch wenn Staatsstraßen innerhalb geschlossener Ortsschaften wie Wohnstraßen funktionieren, so ist deren übergeordnete Rolle im Straßennetz so wichtig, dass wir sie dennoch als highway=secondary taggen und eben nicht downgraden.
Das dient unter anderem der besseren Wegfindung bei Routern, aber auch der generellen Übersichtlichkeit im Straßennetz. :D

Wenn du das irgendwie anders sehen solltest, erläutere mir gerne die Beweggründe!

Liebe Grüße
stoerte
stoerte (2025-11-12 10:21:45+00:00): Und noch eine weitere Anmerkung: Bahnstrecken werden immer von ihrem Nullkilometer aus benannt. Du hast in dem Falle die Strecke Wegliniec-Roßlau fälschlicherweise invertiert. ^^
StC (2025-11-05 10:34:22+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre qui passe par là, en prolongeant un chemin au-delà de sa connexion avec le chemin suivant dans l'itinéraire. Je m'occupe de la réparation.
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2025-11-03 23:52:32+00:00): Lütfen farklı illerdeki değişikliklerinizi ayrı ayrı kaydediniz. Bkz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
Gustav Maps (2025-11-03 23:44:01+00:00): a
gvwaal (2025-11-04 00:53:48+00:00): Correct description: "Finished adding a fence originally added in changeset 140775207, added two trees and a streetlamp to add as references to correctly depict the geometry of the adjacent cycleway. Updated tagging of cycleway."
MassCartog (2025-11-04 14:04:49+00:00): Hi welcome to OSM. Using Googles data to make edits to OSM is not allowed.

"The Google Maps Terms of Use explicitly forbid using Google Maps content - both map data and Google Street View - for making any other content. This includes using them for OSM mapping."

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google

Please remove anything you obtained using googles data.
bartgron (2025-11-04 20:53:16+00:00): Dlaczego zostały dodane aż CZTERY studia tatuażu obok siebie?
aaronq227 (2025-11-06 17:26:03+00:00): Hi Achmad Alqadri,

I noticed you reclassified some tertiary, residential, and track ways to primary in Indonesia. The OSM wiki states that primary classification is reserved for "major highway linking large towns" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dprimary). These ways appear to connect to small towns and villages. Based on this, would you be open to reclassifying these ways back? 

Thanks for your time, and I look forward to hearing from you.
BubbaJuice (2025-11-04 06:33:32+00:00): Hi jRodriquez928,

Areas of natural=* cannot overlap. Please learn about relations: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon. Once you think you are aware, please fix this issue.

Besides that, I appreciate the contribution but not the effort. There's a lot more intricacy to the scrub and wood that you're mapping that you are not appreciating. I would love to see if you improved detail rather than cover the map inaccurately. A good way to improve detail is to use a better editor for the type of mapping you're doing: JOSM.

Thank you,
BubbaJuice
Rodriguez_928 (2025-11-04 23:14:23+00:00): Thanks for reaching out, I am aware of my overlapping issue and can say that it was never my intention. I am looking for ways to resolve the issue but wondered if you any possible solutions.
As for my effortless contributions, I was mapping shrub according to the 'shape' of the mountain ranges. Example, take a look at the mountains southeast of Kingman, I was mostly trying to do something similar to the mountains in Pima & Cochise County. 
But, you are the expert here and thank you again for reaching out!
Rodriguez_928 (2025-11-04 23:15:13+00:00): Thanks for reaching out, I am aware of my overlapping issue and can say that it was never my intention. I am looking for ways to resolve the issue but wondered if you knew any possible solutions.
As for my effortless contributions, I was mapping shrub according to the 'shape' of the mountain ranges. Example, take a look at the mountains southeast of Kingman, I was mostly trying to do something similar to the mountains in Pima & Cochise County.
But, you are the expert here and thanks again for reaching out!
BubbaJuice (2025-11-09 17:28:47+00:00): Yeah so you need to use multipolgyon relations (look at the link in the first message I sent) to avoid the overlapping. I did not mean to insult for "effort"; any contribution on OSM takes effort. It should be allocated properly, in my opinion. I personally greatly value quality over quantity. In the scrub that you map, you miss out on so much detail that I think is what makes a lot of Arizona so beautiful. Although the mountains here are predominately scrub, there are forests in canyons, large sections of rock, and desert grasslands. To familiarize yourself with the difference between some of the natural=* tags see my wiki page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:BubbaJuice/Heath_vs._Scrub. I would also just check https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:natural for more general differentiation.

If I'm being completely honest the first time I mapped landcover by Mount Lemmon it was on iD and it was terrible. iD is not built to handle large amounts of data that are present to map in detail. After I had spent several hours gaining experience elsewhere in JOSM, I came back and redid all of the forest I drew.

I think it may be better if you redirected your effort into possibly mapping forest instead of scrub, as it is generally less complex. There is a lot of forest in northern Arizona that needs mapping. Reach out to me if you have any questions.
MassCartog (2025-11-04 14:04:52+00:00): Hi welcome to OSM. Using Googles data to make edits to OSM is not allowed.

"The Google Maps Terms of Use explicitly forbid using Google Maps content - both map data and Google Street View - for making any other content. This includes using them for OSM mapping."

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google

Please remove anything you obtained using googles data.
SafwatHalaby (2025-11-07 08:11:08+00:00): Hello. Thank you for your contribution!

- Please add a description to the changeset next time

You've marked drinking water as a way. This is usually unnecessary and a node is enough: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174172318

You deleted one road which is present in the aerial imagery. Maybe this was a mistake? It looks narrow so maybe we should mark it as a path instead of deleting?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174172364#map=19/32.715060/35.006041
SafwatHalaby (2025-11-17 13:15:07+00:00): Since there was no response, I applied the suggested changes in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174771494
NeisBot (2025-11-04 01:34:34+00:00): Hi TlMe-, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 99% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 6 highway(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=174172393
TlMe- (2025-11-04 01:55:12+00:00): Yes, it is intentional

https://hiking.biji.co/index.php?q=news&act=info&id=23995

Above URL is the announcement about upstream of Hehuan creek is no longer open to tourist for the protection of Formosan landlocked salmon since 2022.
Some foreigner did not know it, they see the trail from OSM and enter the area. Furthermore, due to the trail is abandoned for years, these foreigner got lost and called for emergency support.
For the sake of our natural resources and the safety of people who use OSM, I remove the trail on purpose. Thanks
caseywittmier (2025-11-04 03:16:31+00:00): It seems like "access=private" should be added to the tags of the foot path.
user_5359 (2025-11-04 07:39:38+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dslipway (see https://www.osm.org/node/12943875949)
aharvey (2025-11-04 08:52:58+00:00): building=yes should only apply to the building, if you're drawing the area to cover the grounds/site there shouldn't be a building tag. I think the iD editor adds this by default as part of the preset, so may need to be manually removed.