piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-20 21:02:10+00:00): I'm really sorry for you, my identity is not something I need to prove to anyone. More important than any label is being human and respecting each other. Don't try to go to the margins. Register according to the rules.
masoudghorbani (2026-02-21 01:49:50+00:00): اگه ناراحت شدین من معذرت میخوام، من این حرف به خاطر تیکه انداختن یا توهین نگفتم، یه کارایی میکنید که خودتون اسم خودتون بد میکنید، مثل این
برنامه‌هایی مثل اسنپ، تپسی، تیکاپ و ... خیلی از برنامه های دیگه هنوز تگ شعبه براشون قابل شناسایی نیست، من نمیدونم چه اصراری به اجرای قانون روی این ۲۲ نقطه داری ؟
کسی نخواست تا ابد به همین شکل بمونه، هروقت این نرم افزارها آپدیت شدن، این مشخصات هم توسط یکی مثل من و شما به روز میشن
همین الان در اروپا هم جاهایی مثل نروژ هم تگ شعبه میزنن و هم داخل تگ اسم اطلاعات شعبه را میزنن
ولی اصرار به قوانین اونم فقط روی اصلاحات من، دیگه اسمش قوانین نیست، یه جور لجبازی بچه گانه هست که احتمالا اون هم به خاطر سن کم شما هست
حالا در هر صورت این تغییرات من دلیل داره که یه نمونه اش را توضیح دادن، مثل شما از سر لجبازی نیست
و قوانین osm هم اگر میخواست میتونست با ۴ خط کد نذاره کسی پرانتز داخل تگ اسم بذاره ، وقتی osm انقدر سخت نمیگیره ، شما هم لازم نیست کاسه داغ تر از آش بشی
زندگیتو بکن، لذت ببر، هرچند که زندگی توی ایران سخت 
شده

البته بعید میدونم توضیحات نتیجه ای داشته باشه، ولی در هر صورت گفتم
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-21 04:36:03+00:00): @masoudghorbany
If we make an exception for one person, then we cannot correct any wrong point. There are many people like you who want their business to be registered on the map as they want. The fact that you insist on getting your point across is not a good reason to do something wrong. Instead, you can give those software the same 4 lines of programming to update itself and your problem will be solved. Do not compensate for the shortcomings of other programs here.
Anonix35 (2026-02-26 11:16:06+00:00): Bonjour,
J'ai vu que vous aviez modifié les noms de certaines remontées à Chamonix en rajoutant leur préfixe juste avant.

Le format correct dans "name=" est simplement le nom propre de l'installation.
Rajouter TS ou TC n'est pas nécessaire car il ya "aerialway="
stasiu512 (2026-02-21 18:22:09+00:00): Cześć, co zabrania zawracania w tym miejscu?
Tomek | Yanosik (2026-02-23 07:58:20+00:00): cześć, dzięki poprawiłem. A tutaj: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2896297 obowiazuje zakaz skretu w lewo?
stasiu512 (2026-02-23 09:35:55+00:00): dzięki za poprawę, odpowiadając na pytanie to tak, znak poziomy P-8a umieszczony na jezdni na lewym skrajnym pasie ruchu zakazuje skrętu w lewo czyli zawracania w tym miejscu, czyli podsumowując ta restrykcja jest dobra.
Tomek | Yanosik (2026-02-23 09:43:54+00:00): to wszystko jasne dzięki :)
marc__marc (2026-02-20 16:51:14+00:00): Bonjour,
Je suis content de constater que vous utilisez et améliorer le projet.

Cependant quand un sentier vient d'être supprimé sur le terrain, je vous conseille de ne pas l'effacer dans OpenStreetMap mais de lui ajouter un cycle de vie par ex was:highway=path + end_date=2026-02 + note=sentier détruit sur le terrain ou autre texte qui convient.

cela évite que le contributeur suivant, ne voyant plus l'objet, rajoute le tracé soit à partir de l'imagerie satellite soit à partir de trace de trajet (par ex Strava)

Cordialement,
Marc
marc__marc (2026-02-20 16:54:23+00:00): mon message était destiné à un autre groupe de modification https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178713508
Je reposte là-bas pour rendre la discussion plus compréhensible
MihaelIvanjek (2026-02-23 15:30:04+00:00): Tags that were accidentally added to the node have since been deleted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178948578 @OptimoRoute
eggie (2026-02-20 14:54:49+00:00): Hoi.. width=0 kan fysiek niet.
Beter die regel verwijderen. Of je moet echt de breedte weten.
Groet,
eggie
NeisBot (2026-02-20 14:42:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13584872759 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Book cafe"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-28 17:33:12+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179180222
(No visible changes after review)
DoubleBassoon (2026-02-24 21:41:41+00:00): Hey silly_goose,
It seems that you have deleted the entire track infrastructure of the future ICE plant. Was that intentional?
silly_goose (2026-02-25 05:53:01+00:00): Hey :)

Yes, it was intentional. Besides some sand, dirt, and construction vehicles, there's really nothing left of the old yard.

I reckon, there'll be a completely new track layout, where it'd be easier to start from scratch with mapping the new maintenance depot.

(I can revert the changeset, but I did that intentionally)
DoubleBassoon (2026-02-25 21:54:49+00:00): Hey :)
You're right of course, but the track layout was already that of the new ICE plant. So if you restore the tracks, no one has to do it from scratch anymore.
silly_goose (2026-02-26 05:23:50+00:00): Oh...Uhm...Yeah, I'll revert it tonight!!!

Very sorry about that 😅
silly_goose (2026-02-26 20:45:15+00:00): Should be fixed.
I'm very sorry for the inconvenience; thanks for the comment! :)
soliMM (2026-02-22 09:33:09+00:00): Hi, during your alignment of the roads for some reason you have deleted single node which contained information about traffic sign. Was this accidental or on purpose because traffic sign doesn't exist anymore? If it was removed by mistake, please restore the node.
KempsValley (2026-02-24 11:00:13+00:00): Hi soliMM,
This was an accident, and I have restored this node. Thanks for letting me know!
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2026-03-22 18:50:20+00:00): مرحبا بك في خريطة الشارع المفتوح، أرجوا منكم قبل القيام بأي تعديلات في المرات القادمة معرفة ماذا تفعل، لأنك قمت بتحويل منطقة زراعية إلى مدينة! ولا حاجة لذلك لأن النقطة التي تمثل المدينة موجودة ولا يوجد مشكلة بها ولا حاجة لكل ما قمت به!
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2026-03-22 18:57:55+00:00): لقد قمت بإصلاح جميع الأخطاء ونرجوا منكم الانتباه في المساهمات القادمة وشكرا لك
eggie (2026-02-21 09:17:57+00:00): Hoi,

Gebruikelijker is het om een buurt of wijk op een placenode te zetten ipv een vlak. 
Vaak bij wijken icm een vlak en dan het geheel in een relatie te zetten. 
Zoek maar eens voorbeelden in andere buurten en wijken. 
Het ligt er een beetje aan hoe de rest van de wijken in de gemeente is getagd. 
Groet,
eggie
molensteen (2026-02-21 15:53:40+00:00): dank eggie. ik heb een poging gedaan. De sportheldenbuurt lijkt het met een area te doen, java eiland met een relation. hier is de changeset mocht u het interesseren: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178865232
groetjes molensteen
Ltrlg (2026-02-27 09:56:40+00:00): Pourquoi fusionner le bâtiment et son contenu ?
schabanel (2026-02-27 10:10:36+00:00): Bonjour,

La notion de mairie est présente sur le bâtiment depuis 14 ans, et le point a été rajouté bien plus tard pour indiquer une agence postale, puis modifié plusieurs années plus tard pour indiquer la mairie, créant ainsi des incohérences ainsi qu'un doublon. Je l'ai donc retiré pour supprimer le doublon, en conservant l'objet le plus ancien et le plus cohérent. A titre personnel, je préfère un point dans le bâtiment que des données directement sur le bâtiment, mais lorsque le choix inverse est fait, je ne le remets pas en cause.
Bonne journée.

Cordialement,
Simon.
Ltrlg (2026-02-27 12:46:49+00:00): Je suis plutôt d’accord pour garder le choix existant à priori. Mais quand ça commence à impliquer des conflits de classification (comme la suppression de la source ici), je n’hésite en général pas à séparer.
schabanel (2026-02-27 14:47:23+00:00): Je ne suis pas certain de comprendre le conflit de classification ici. La source du point supprimé était fausse car concernait les anciens tags (l'agence postale), la source du bâtiment n'est clairement pas le cadastre de 2011 car non aligné dessus, et ledit bâtiment a été modifié dans son tracé en 2020 (par vous d'ailleurs). Donc cette information n'était pas bonne non plus, donc supprimée. A titre perso, je mets la source de mes modifs dans le changeset, au moins c'est toujours à jour et n'est pas reporté d'une version à l'autre de l'objet sans vérification aucune. Maintenant, si vous souhaitez créer un point pour le lieu et le détacher du bâtiment, vous avez ma bénédiction, d'autant plus en votre qualité de contributeur local qui peut-être veille à l'homogénéité des données localement (à défaut d'homogénéité nationale...).
Bonne fin de journée et bonnes contributions !
dzamper (2026-07-30 15:23:59+00:00): Ta edycja zmieniła parking w sklep… Trzeba poprawić
eggie (2026-02-20 19:08:13+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Loicbtc (2026-02-20 15:37:29+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178824387
NeisBot (2026-02-20 15:39:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13544067200 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Tech store"

#MapWithoutSpam
ItaliA1delSole (2026-02-20 15:43:10+00:00): Wikipedia - https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strada_statale_5_Via_Tiburtina_Valeria "	ANAS (dal km 15,800 al km 70,000 e dal km 98,200 al km 216,600); dal 2001 la gestione del rimanente tratto è passata alla Regione Lazio e alla Regione Abruzzo, che hanno ulteriormente devoluto le competenze alle rispettive province."
NeisBot (2026-02-20 15:45:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13551229883 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Food stall"
---
ตัวอย่างเช่น รูปแบบที่เป็นกลางและเป็นข้อเท็จจริงมากกว่าของข้อความของคุณอาจเป็น: "ร้านอาหาร"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-28 17:33:14+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179180224
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
flex16 (2026-02-20 15:51:30+00:00): Hi,

Abbiegebeschränkungen müssen mit einem Punkt und zwei Linien erfasst werden.

Wird auch hier erklärt:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Relation:restriction

Der U-turn wurde von mir gefixed. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178825042
m_fuhrmann (2026-02-20 15:58:15+00:00): Ah. From - Via - To. Verstanden.

Vielen Dank für's drüber schauen. Vorhin hatte mich das Navi da drehen lassen wollen.
Mlvln (2026-02-20 18:53:25+00:00): Hallo Plooky,
ich habe deine Änderungen rückgängig gemacht. Du hast die Musikschule in die Busroute M41 eingefügt. Die ist für den Routenverlauf und die dazugehörigen Haltestellen vorgesehen. Es waren auch mehrere Duplikate der Musikschule vorhanden. 

Warum die Musikschule nicht auf der Standardkarte angezeigt wird hat die Alex hier schon in der Diskussion erklärt:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164108240

Viele Grüße
Mlvln
Rainero (2026-03-14 19:16:27+00:00): Revert mit changeset/179872548
(unzulässige Quelle)
Fraxi (2026-02-20 16:43:41+00:00): Мите, май сме се разминали вчера. Една от кофите е излишна. Виж https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13585085710 и близката, която сложих снощи.
Dimitar155 (2026-02-20 17:41:14+00:00): Обединих ги
Fraxi (2026-02-20 17:51:39+00:00): Има още... :D Чакай...
NeisBot (2026-02-20 16:06:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 43 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/217511927 v12 | 8 crossings
https://osm.org/way/23186408 v14 | 8 crossings
https://osm.org/way/49802960 v10 | 7 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/250737972 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178825528
A67-A67 (2026-04-13 23:29:40+00:00): De tag highway=construction wordt normaal niet gebruikt voor kortdurende werkzaamheden. Dat soort afsluitingen worden aangegeven met access:conditional = no @ (periode), waarbij in de periode de begin- einddatum komen te staan. 

In dit geval geef je aan dat de werkzaamheden tot 6 maart duren, maar de fietspaden staat nu halverwege april nog steeds op highway=construction. Zijn de werkzaamheden al voorbij?
aTarom (2026-02-20 16:19:06+00:00): Hola, el tag
"EIC"
en
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20244692/history
es correcto? o un error de importación?
Saludos
framarcato_em (2026-02-20 16:28:36+00:00): Hola, gracias por notarlo. Lo acabo de corregir con el tag correcto. ¡Saludos!
Arlo James Barnes (2026-02-21 04:24:44+00:00): You converted what looks on aerial imagery to be a garden of some sort, possibly a helipad before that, to a brownfield; is there a source for that?
nickvet419 (2026-02-21 06:09:49+00:00): According to newer imagery that garden design was removed around  2023 as you can see on GE and Mapbox images. Haven't seen any new design since its removal.
Arlo James Barnes (2026-02-21 06:37:00+00:00): Ah, good catch. https://sfcomaps.santafecountynm.gov/mapsvc/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=7ba6293895454413a140b25200f40fda has it as just dirt, too.
Frans S (2026-02-22 11:50:11+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please add a 'ford' tag where paths crossed a waterway
It is not logical when you map paths to a settlement and continue to map this track as highway=residential in a settlement . Just use the same tag.
Best regards
eggie (2026-02-20 19:10:47+00:00): Welkom bij OSM..  De info samengevoegd tot één node.

MVG
eggie
KKS (2026-03-03 23:28:21+00:00): Вітаю. Не є дуже коректним надання коліям назв між станціями між якими вони прокладені.
NeisBot (2026-02-20 16:42:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13585121677 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Event venue"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-28 17:33:17+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179180226
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
5m4u9 (2026-03-07 04:41:55+00:00): Hola, con este y otros cambios estás cambiando la vía más importante que viene de mallasa y se une a la ballivián?

Puede que tenga sentido, pero tu cambio va hasta la costanera.... hasta donde vas a cambiar? av. la paz? 

lo más real es que la av. que viene de mallasa se una en la rotonda del mercado de cholas.... pero quedará raro que no se unan la balivián y hernan siles... 🤔
chris66 (2026-04-04 16:09:49+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/143044537

die gesamte Siedlung hat eine Hausnr.?
Frans S (2026-02-24 16:47:43+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping. 
Accurate mapped.
Here are a few multi story buildings which need to be mapped over the rooflines and moved to their footprint.
Check this footage please.

https://youtu.be/u31wPYWkm3E?si=lDbvDutpUyZWQXXL

Best regards
NeisBot (2026-02-20 17:27:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13364035661 v4

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Tattoo studio"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-28 17:33:17+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179180228
(No visible changes after review)
silversurfer83 (2026-02-20 18:49:57+00:00): Thank you. Something I totally missed
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178828880
NeisBot (2026-02-20 17:33:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13383785281 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Beauty salon"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-01 05:33:02+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179195364
(No visible changes after review)
eggie (2026-02-20 19:11:14+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
JeroenHoek (2026-02-20 20:25:49+00:00): De juiste huisnummers staan al op de kaart in losse nodes. Door ze ook op het gebouw te zetten creëer je zo dubbelingen.
dzamper (2026-07-02 08:44:16+00:00): Naprawdę będą się nazywać „Niepołomice [Nowe]” i „Niepołomice Pasternik [Nowe]”? Razem z tym „[Nowe]”? Bo śmiem wątpić :)
SomeoneElse (2026-03-13 23:55:14+00:00): Two points:
a) this is not a "road alignment" change it's an armchair change from unclassified to tertiary
b) based on survey, tertiary is not justified here.
I'll revert this and some others; please discuss any such future changes in the forum on a case by case basis.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-03-14 00:05:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 179832897 where the changeset comment is: Reverting numerous undiscussed road category changes.  See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=2261940 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19961
GanKonMalade (2026-04-16 09:55:29+00:00): Bonjour,

Via cette modification vous avez ajouté un GiFi et un Action déjà présent, cela crée plusieurs doublons dans cette zone.
Serait-il possible de corriger pour ne garder qu'un seul GiFi/Action/Cigaverte?

Bonne journée
eggie (2026-02-20 19:12:39+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
rarad74 (2026-02-21 09:18:36+00:00): Salut. Nu se pun adrese ca nume de strazi. Adresa o pui ca si nod cu tag-rule necesare la intrarea pe acea strada, sau pe cladire de care apartine adresa.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-03-14 00:05:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 179832897 where the changeset comment is: Reverting numerous undiscussed road category changes.  See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=2261940 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19961
eggie (2026-02-21 09:02:38+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
literan (2026-02-21 10:00:20+00:00): на проход в здании следует еще ставить тег tunnel=building_passage

я исправлю тут
maro21 (2026-02-22 14:37:45+00:00): To jest restauracja z kelnerami?
PierZen (2026-02-20 19:39:59+00:00): encore ici données tres approximatives et source qui semble inexacte. Svp cessez ces modifications, sinon je devrai communiquer avec de DWG de OSM.
PierZen (2026-02-20 23:33:28+00:00): voir https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178832303#map=14/54.65549/-79.19083
comparaison avec imagerie Bing ou Esri montre tracé très grossier avec de grandes étendues d'eau près de la rive qui sont ignorées.
Jarek 🚲 (2026-02-23 17:32:10+00:00): Hi FahRadler, your changes are being discussed in the thread https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/nouveaux-imports-reseau-hydrographique-du-canada-canvec-et-source-possiblement-ia/141778

Could you tell us what is the source of the data you have added? The scale of the uploads make it rather unlikely to have been traced by hand.
eggie (2026-02-20 19:55:38+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  Het is niet de bedoeling om voor PoGo een effect te bereiken dmv van gekunstelde toevoegingen.
Je plakt hiert voetpaden op wegen.
Trottoirs kun je opnemen in de hoofdrijbaan met de tag sidewalk=bot, right of left.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sidewalk
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-02-20 19:56:59+00:00): reverted by changeset #178833718
eggie (2026-02-20 20:09:45+00:00): Trottoirs zijn opgenomen in de tagging van de hoofdrijbaan
Rainero (2026-03-14 18:49:26+00:00): Revert mit changeset/179871777
(unzulässige Quelle)
Bienson (2026-02-21 02:10:07+00:00): historic=tomb

"Eine historisch bedeutende Grabanlage, z.B. ein Hügelgrab, Pyramidengrab oder Felsengrab."

cemetery=grave

"Eine Grabstätte ist eine in den Boden eingegrabene Stelle für die Beisetzung eines Leichnams, die oft mit einem Grabstein gekennzeichnet ist."

Ist die Inschrift des Grabstein wirklich "Der Schreiner August Vockerodt wurde hier einen Tag nach Eröffnung des Friedhofs begraben."?

Außerdem sind Namen weiterhin keine Beschreibungen.

Der Name dieses Grabes ist nicht "Ältestes Grab (25.11.1897)".
NeisBot (2026-02-20 19:24:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13355769732 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Feed store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-01 05:33:03+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179195365
(No visible changes after review)
alexey_zakharenkov (2026-03-14 07:42:38+00:00): Здравствуйте.

Съезды https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/96921646 и https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/247163007 имеют такую же важность в дорожной сети, как и дорога 16К-19 и, следовательно, должны иметь статус secondary.