piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
gscholz (2023-08-14 06:37:40+00:00): Hi  VF Maps,
your recent edits have left behind a big amount of errors in the OSM database regarding duplicate node:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=26.19930&lat=-29.11885&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?

You may also like to educate yourself about how to write reasonable changeset comments:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Kind regards
Guido
eggie (2023-08-14 11:31:50+00:00): Dag Van Zanten.. Je vraagt feedback...  In dit geval heb ik de hele adresnode verwijderd, want het BAG adres staat op het aangrenzende gebouw aan de straatkant.

MVG
eggie
van Zanten (2023-08-14 11:37:23+00:00): Hoi Eggie,
Dankje, is nu de hele bedrijfsvermelding weg? Ik zie hem nu nog wel op de kaart staan. Mvg Johan
eggie (2023-08-14 11:42:04+00:00): Dag Johan...  Even je cache leegmaken... CTRL-F5  een paar keer. 

MVG
eggie
van Zanten (2023-08-14 11:44:03+00:00): Dat was m, thanks!
JeroenHoek (2023-08-25 08:34:52+00:00): Ik was hier van de week op vakantie; ik heb nog een paar dingen aangepast, maar de recente satellietbeelden tonen vooral wolken…

Ik heb de boundary-relatie het juiste type gegeven: type=boundary. Je had multipolygon gebruikt. De plaatsnode zit ook in die relatie als 'label'.
Eino81 (2023-09-28 19:02:41+00:00): Hi, were you there, have you checked, what kind of street is that? I was there today, it is closed, a privvate street... If you add a new element to OSM, please be sure, that you add the right categories to that... I will update it now.
adamos (2023-10-02 09:11:11+00:00): Hello, what exact street you have in mind? Thanks Adam
Eino81 (2023-10-02 10:34:22+00:00): Chotouchovska, a tiny "dead end" street in Ujezd nad Lesy...
adamos (2023-10-02 10:43:55+00:00): I am not aware of changing street attributes, however, sorry if I made any mistake and thank you for the correction.
map per (2023-08-25 10:28:53+00:00): Hallo Black2Orange,

der Weg ist eigentlich ein reiner Radweg und die Fußwege verlaufen parallel.

Viele Grüße
map per
streckenkundler (2023-09-30 16:54:35+00:00): Diesen hab ich wieder entfernt. Er lag im NSG!!  Zelten ist im Spreewald nur auf dafür vorgesehenen und ausgewiesenen Plätzen erlaubt!
GeorgeKaplan (2023-08-16 13:15:49+00:00): Bonjour ccath94,

Le nom Collège Simone Veil s'applique sur le collège et uniquement le collège (ici c'est toute l'emprise beige). On ne doit pas répéter ce nom sur chacun des éléments qui le composent. Peux-tu stp supprimer le nom des algecos ? Merci
ccath94 (2023-08-16 16:11:07+00:00): J'ai corrigé. Merci
Frans S (2023-08-26 12:06:55+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings need to be improved to meet the quality standards of HOTOSM.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document for more info)
A: E: Inaccurate mapped and / or not squared.
 When buildings have L, U shape or protruding elements, they should be included into your mappings.
* Please be sure the object you want to map is a building. When there is no shadow next to it, or traces of human activity, it is mostly not a building.  Buildings have mostly a gray or brown roof. Green means trees or scrub.
* Quality prevails over quantity!!




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139829281
aceman444 (2023-09-03 12:06:25+00:00): Zdravim, poprosim trochu zmysluplnejsi popis zmien, pozrite https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Good_changeset_comments .
A naco ste pridali zastavku
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11112122447 ? Nic tam predsa v tom case nestalo, kedye linky 68 bollil presmerovane.

Taktiez odstranenie bodu https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2299864772 je chyba, ten bod bol spravny.

Na brane https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7669697440 pridanie bicycle=yes a foot=yes tiez nedava zmysel. Ked je tam access=permissivi, znamena, ze niekedy moze byt brana zatvorena. Potom sa tam nedostanete ani bicyklom ani pesi. A ci je tam vobec dovolene ist bicyklom aj ked je otvorena, tak to by ma zaujimalo podla akej dopravnej znacky ste na to prisli.

Davajte na to pozor, lebo tato sada zmien je viac skody ako uzitku (jedine tie pamatne tabule vyzeraju OK).
Stefan@MUC (2024-06-16 11:09:32+00:00): Wie kommst du auf "Gangelhofer80", wo steht das? Hab's mit Änderungssatz 139829655 korrigiert.
map per (2024-06-16 12:43:48+00:00): Danke, das sieht sehr nach einem Fehler von mir aus. (Die Fotos von damals hab ich aber leider schon gelöscht)
Map-Peter (2023-08-14 23:35:08+00:00): Hallo LupoBianco63,
 
es sieht so aus das allen deinen "wenea"-Eintragungen die Haupteigenschaft fehlt.
 
Ich habe mir eben deren Webseite angeschaut und den POI in Neubrandenburg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11112168322/history mit "amenity=place_of_worship" ergänzt https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dplace_of_worship .
 
Dazu habe ich nich weitere Anpassungen vorgenommen - z.B. "name" .
 
Gruß Peter
Larmax (2023-08-13 16:02:49+00:00): Hei, laiturialueiden olisi hyvä olla kiinni jalkakäytävässä/pyörätiessä, jotta reititys toimii oikein. Tämä taitaa olla käytäntönä yleisesti muualla Suomessa, ainakin Pääkaupunkiseudulla.
user_20069226 (2023-08-13 15:26:18+00:00): This revert was a mistake. It has been reverted by changeset 139830207.
user_20069226 (2023-08-13 15:26:59+00:00): The comment was autogenerated as I forgot to put in a comment for RevertUI.
Langlaeufer (2025-04-15 14:14:28+00:00): Hallo notzfc,
Wege müssen mit dem restlichen Wegenetz verbunden werden, sonst ist ein Routing nicht möglich. Daher, entweder die Wege verbinden oder auf das gesonderte Einzeichnen verzichten.
Grüße Langläufer
Mashin (2023-08-13 18:01:17+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM!
Thanks for the edits, but what I noticed you also created 2 unlabeled points and a hot spring in Connecticut that does not exist. 
Best is to stay in smaller area when editing and double check the edits before uploading them.
Cheers
Akkurator (2024-02-04 18:27:13+00:00): Hallo ChrisFromRV,
Du hast hier der K 7700 von Ebersberg bis Litzelmannshof surface=chipseal getaggt.
Das ist eine Asphaltstraße, die mit Rollsplit ausgebessert wurde.
Das wiki zu chipseal sagt: 
"Beschreibt die Oberfläche eines Elements aus feinem Kies in ein Substrat gepresst wie z.B. Teer, welcher in Deutschland nicht aufzufinden ist.
Es wird auf nordamerikanischen Straßen in ländlichen Gegenden benutzt und dabei besser als eine unbefestigte Oberfläche, aber nicht so teuer und ebenertig wie Asphalt.
...
Nicht zu verwechseln mit der mancherorts zu findenden Übersetzung "Rollsplitt", welcher bei der Herstellung von Asphaltflächen entsteht."
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:surface%3Dchipseal

Es sieht demnach so aus, als wäre chipseal nicht korrekte für Rollsplit auf Asphalt.

Grüße,
Akkurator
ivanbranco (2023-08-13 19:25:37+00:00): "contact:facebook=Fb.com" is an invalid value tho

other contacts link to a person, not to the contact page of an hotel

how did you verified this entry?
LockOnGuy (2023-08-13 21:41:49+00:00): I removed this this because there is no hotel here, I have survived the location.    
What is your source to revert my changeset?
LockOnGuy (2023-08-14 02:19:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully by changeset 139849926 and the changeset comment is: Revert a revert changeset when a user reverted my revert without local knowledge. This node is spam and there is no hotel here. Source=survey.
user_20069226 (2023-08-14 02:46:08+00:00): Sorry about that. From now on I will always verify with locals before reverting, unless the changeset is spam, like changeset 139850124.
augil (2023-08-13 15:38:18+00:00): test*
user_177389 (2023-08-13 16:06:01+00:00): Stop writing the Czech name in the name tag which are on the German side! The name then belongs in name:cz.
Wookey (2023-08-15 00:31:10+00:00): Hi Tristan. Looks like we both did a pile of building editing in Surlingham at the weekend which has rather unfortunately overlapped. I've been correcting alignment and building shapes, whilst you've been adding housenumbers and also correcting shapes.
Result is 132 conflicts on my upload. I'll try to resolve everything so as to not lose anything but you might want to check back in case I mess anything up. There are a great many buildings in twice now.
Wookey (2023-08-15 02:41:50+00:00): OK. It's done now. This has taken me all day to sort out so I'm not going to do any more in the area for now!
Tristan Scott (2023-08-15 06:42:10+00:00): Dang, that's bad luck.

I've got a few more house number notes on ferry road, but that's it. I can put them in anyone's so unless I hear back I'll leave it a week or two so reduce the chances of a collision if you're actively fixing. The original house shapes were mostly wrong from a basic import, so having surveyed some mostly they needed adjusting.
spughetti_tomtom (2024-10-29 10:00:39+00:00): Hey Dillen,

De link in de note leidt nu naar een 404 pagina, weet jij of dit project nog gaande is?

Heb in de tussentijd dit gebouw getagd met building=construction

Cheers
Dillen GJ (2024-10-30 12:43:02+00:00): Dat is gek want ik wordt via de link doorverwezen naar: https://vernieuwingspaarneboog.nl/
Building= construction is sowieso fout want het winkelcentrumpje is volledig operationeel… De verbouwing moet nog allemaal plaatsvinden heb de screendumps naar je e-mail adres gestuurd. Misschien een tijdelijk 404-pagina geweest of plaatselijk aan jouw kant een internet onderbreking ?
Dillen GJ (2024-10-30 13:12:52+00:00): Kijk voordat je aanpassingen doet eerst naar de gemeentepagina van dit project via 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1197647126 via die Haarlem.NL pagina zie je de projectfase waarin dit project zich bevindt.
Project is aan beginfase (sloop leegstaand pand tegen over het huidige winkelcentrum) zie hiervoorook: https://vernieuwingspaarneboog.nl/images/001_Bewonersbrief_QB_2110_DEF.pdf
Dillen GJ (2024-10-30 13:40:06+00:00): Dus heb building=construction weer terug gezet naar building=commercial

Cheers
MxxCon (2023-08-16 02:23:53+00:00): Perhaps instead of note= it's more suitable for the description= tag?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139831445
brandonbds (2023-08-16 02:28:00+00:00): Yes, you’re right. I hadn’t noticed it wasn’t description.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139831445
wolfshafen (2025-09-10 13:56:45+00:00): Moin!
Als ich heute den offiziellen Gleisplan der LPA (https://bekanntmachungen.luebeck.de/dokumente/d/568/inline) mit den OSM-Daten verglich bemerkte ich die fehlende Verbindungsschiene https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1197731176. Offensichtlich hattest du vergessen die Attribute zu vervollständigen, so dass sie nicht dargestellt wurde. Ich habe dies inzwischen nachgeholt.
Viele Grüße
Frans S (2023-08-24 15:17:55+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
A remark.
Often, sidewalls of a (somewhat) bigger buildings are visible as well.
Don't map that as a building.
Just map the whole building over the rooflines and move it to its footprint.
Best regards
trigpoint (2023-08-13 16:29:25+00:00): Hi
Where were these edits discussed with the community?

They seem to fall into the category https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations_are_not_categories.

The UK has a very active comm
trigpoint (2023-08-13 16:34:08+00:00): The UK has a very active community and this type of edit should have been consulted.

I am not sure what this relation achieves, we already have the data which can easily be found with https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1yRS

I also wonder why, if these relations are a good idea, they weren't created many years ago.

Cheers Phil
Aleksandar Matejevic (2023-08-13 17:05:56+00:00): Hi Phil, 
thanks for your comment and interest in this topic. Yes, I have been involved in discussions about creating relations with the universities in the UK on a couple of channels. 

The community was against changing current tagging since many universities are using OSM for their website maps. There are some examples across the globe proposed, but the final was do not change already tagged entities. 

No one objected to the idea of creating type=site relations since for some universities, you will find a lot of buildings, land, and accommodation operated by a certain university, and they are not of the same type. 

The main thing for creating these relations is to make these universities visible and easily searchable on OSM. The operator tag is not searchable in the current search box, you will need to have overpass knowledge for this, and even then you will not have all things in one place. This was the first thing done, adding an operator tag based on the uni website, but it turned out to be a time-consuming job, a lot of things were not tagged, and if someone removes the tag, you will not have a result in a query. A lot of unexperienced mappers delete tags on ID editor, but if you have a relation, that is way difficult to remove so it gives the extra safety that the university will be found at the end. 

Another thing is that you can put variant names on just one relation and that will cover the search in different languages. Germany has a lot of relations to fix similar issues. 

After creating the relation I would like to improve geometries, one by one University at the time, add variant names and probably create a MapRoullete task across other communities to name them on their languages. Also, there is a tagging schema that is still under proposal, but I do not see that it will not be approved and then it will be way easier to add just member type and everything will be in line. 

But yes, it was discussed on Loomio and talk-gb, also some emails were exchanged with OSMUK board. I have also received some positive feedback for some users, but I also appreciate your concern.
trigpoint (2023-08-13 18:03:46+00:00): I do remember the loomio thread now. Rereading it nobody said it was a good idea. In fact sk53 explained very well why you shouldn't make such relations.
JakeTheMoose (2023-08-29 20:01:17+00:00): Hi Zol87,

Are you sure that the temporary Grayland station is closed? I could not find any notice on Metra's website or in local news.

Regards,
Jake
JakeTheMoose (2023-11-28 05:20:00+00:00): Hi Zol87,

I have confirmed the temporary Grayland station is in fact open. I will update this finding.
hrhino (2023-08-13 18:45:18+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OSM! Thanks for fixing the name of The Ledges (can't believe it's been wrong for over a decade!) but I can't resolve the domain name for the website. Is it still up somewhere? Would you mind checking (I can't find it) and updating/removing it? Thanks!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139834046
rhymeswithmogul (2023-08-13 19:19:35+00:00): No, it doesn’t look like it’s up. I found Friends of The Ledges, but their site is missing too. I guess it can be removed. Some bloggers talk about it but nothing is an official page.
Demyanst (2024-03-26 23:02:40+00:00): Раньше здесь был ресторан Лето. Остались руины от него
Pieter Vander Vennet (2023-08-14 09:26:09+00:00): Hi Saerdnaer,

OpenStreetMap isn't really the place for temporary events. Also, there is a detailed map on https://map.events.ccc.de/camp/2023/map/
saerdnaer (2023-09-30 08:44:05+00:00): It sure is, as long as one cleans up afterwards. The goal of OSM is always to reflect the current state of the word.
Pieter Vander Vennet (2023-10-01 21:34:17+00:00): Eh, not really: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don%27t_map_temporary_events_and_temporary_features

And even if, the mapping was incorrect as well...
emersonveenstra (2023-08-14 10:24:51+00:00): Hi,

On https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1197744499 you have oneway=yes, but you also have lanes:forward and lanes:backward. Could you please go back and fix that? Thanks!
bkil (2023-08-14 12:01:14+00:00): Szeretnék érdeklődni, hogy hol volt ez egyeztetve?
itineris (2023-08-14 14:18:41+00:00): Sehol.
bkil (2023-08-14 14:31:40+00:00): Tudnánk pár szót váltani mátrixon? Megemlítettelek így remélhetőleg kaptál róla üzenetet. Teljesen véletlenül most került ez előtérbe tegnap és szerkesztési ütközéskor lettem figyelmes a mega-változáscsomagra.
Taya_S (2023-08-14 06:58:54+00:00): Hello HighlandMark,

I noticed you added a bothy. I was wondering if you may have some additional information about it? Things such as name and access. 

See these bothies for example:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/105250898
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/115026204
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/446506492

Sincerely,
Taya
Akkurator (2023-08-27 23:07:55+00:00): Eher eine spärlich bewachsene Brache, die nicht bewirtschaftet wird oder als Weide dient. Daher keine Meadow.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:landuse%3Dmeadow
s.a. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139769407
NorthCrab_upload (2023-08-13 17:50:20+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11112453852
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/758092330

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Sniping (2023-08-13 20:43:43+00:00): Poprawiłem. Mam nadzieję, że teraz dobrze. Sugerowałem się poprzednim wpisem adresowym i doczytałem w Pl:Key:addr:*. Dziękuję.
NorthCrab (2023-08-14 00:52:12+00:00): Poprawiłem jeszcze addr:city -> addr:place. W tym przypadku, gdy nie ma nazwy ulicy to stosujemy addr:place. Tak, wiem, skomplikowane to trochę :D. addr:city oczekuje że będzie mu podany jeszcze addr:street po prostu.
Sniping (2023-08-14 07:46:32+00:00): Rozumiem, dziękuję. Miasto wpisujemy tylko wtedy, gdy jest nazwa ulicy. Wiki trochę niejasno to tłumaczy.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-23 09:41:24+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11112424013/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
gscholz (2023-08-14 06:55:33+00:00): Hi,
this changeset has created a lot of errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=122.46984&lat=-4.02828&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=139836752

I have reverted it to fix those issues. 
Kind regards
Guido
Farras (2023-08-14 11:16:27+00:00): Hi, Guido. Thanks for the fix.

Looks like I missed those stretched ways near Kendari. I've managed to catch [the ones in the north near Lake Towuti](https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139838270). I'm definitely going to use JOSM's Replace Geometry (Ctrl+Shift+G) more carefully.
silversurfer83 (2023-08-23 09:11:30+00:00): Gude :)

hätte da mal Fragen zu dieser Änderung:
Oberfläche Asphalt und tracktype=grade4 passen nicht zusammen. Da wäre es super, wenn du mal im Wiki die Definitionen auf dieser Seite studieren könntest um dann die Eigenschaften anzupassen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dtrack

Dann würde mich noch die genaue Beschilderung des Weges interessieren: Gibt es rechtlich bindende Schilder wie ein VZ 250 oder ähnlich?

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139836974
flashfinger (2023-08-23 13:45:36+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis mit der Oberfläche. Im Straßenverlauf ändert der sich. Das sollte ich jetzt korrigiert haben.
An der Kreuzung Severinusstr/Hubertusstr steht das VZ 255 "Verbot für Krafträder" für den Teil der Severinusstr der nach Süden geht.
Beste Grüße,
flashfinger
silversurfer83 (2023-08-23 15:00:30+00:00): Hi
danke für die schnelle Reaktion :)

Das Schild sorgt dann für die Berechtigungen für die Straße und die lauten dann 
motorcycle=no
moped=no
mofa=no
traffic_sign=DE:255

Der Zugang ist also keinesfalls "access=private", da dies auch Fahrräder und Feldfahrzeuge ausschließen würde.

Wenn es ein Feldweg ist, dann darf gerne ein "tracktype" gesetzt werden. Bei aspahltierten Wegen idR 1 oder 2. Mit smoothness kann dann die Oberflächengüte beschrieben werden.

Bei Fragen, immer raus damit

Grüße
silversurfer83
flashfinger (2023-08-23 15:32:26+00:00): Hi silversurfer83,
da hätte ich dann gerne Deine Korrekturen dazu in dem Datensatz. Ich kann leider nicht erkennen wo die rein kommen sollen. In meiner deutschen Version von OSM sind die Felder nicht zu finden.
Grüße,
flashfinger
flashfinger (2023-08-23 15:45:46+00:00): Hab jetzt was korrigiert. Schau mal ob ich es richtig getroffen habe. Danke!
silversurfer83 (2023-08-23 15:54:29+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140282575
AngocA (2023-09-05 22:51:52+00:00): Hello Ce Ja. Espero no se te hayan olvidado unos elementos de aquí que falta por terminar/cerrar. Los encontré porque vi tu nota.
Mahdi Nameghi (2023-08-14 04:00:38+00:00): سلام
اسم خیابان باید اسمی باشه که روی تابلو آن نوشته شده
باز شدن یا بسته بودنش نباید در اسم بیاد
esmaeil897 (2023-09-11 17:24:12+00:00): حالا چه اشکالی داره یک روز هم که شده اینجوری نمایش داده بشود 
امام خمینی باز شد !!
NorthCrab_upload (2023-08-13 18:30:16+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6669163786
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/155010832

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Graf Westerholt (2023-08-15 05:58:05+00:00): Why is „public_transport=stop_position“ wrong?
RubenKelevra (2023-08-15 14:51:19+00:00): This tag marks the position where the bus stops on the road. It is wrong if used on a node next to a road where the highway=bus_stop node is.
wambacher (2023-08-14 05:04:16+00:00): Moin,

knapp daneben ist auch vorbei ;)
siehe  https://wambachers-osm.website/Postcodes.html?map=18/48.167161/11.565935&base=OSM&data=PCBDE,PCDE,WPCDE

Gruß
walter
UKausch (2023-08-16 17:56:30+00:00): Moin Walter,

coole Seite, Kompliment.  Danke dass Du die Fehler gleich korrigiert hast.  Hast Du bemerkt dass die Kirche [1] und das dazugehörige Pfarramt [2] in verschiedenen PLZ-Bereichen liegen?  Und dann soll man nicht vom Glauben abfallen.

Servus
Uwe

[1] https://osm.org/way/27390774
[2] https://osm.org/node/2789060236
NorthCrab_upload (2023-08-13 18:50:16+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11112555115

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
vng_me (2023-08-14 01:46:05+00:00): Well, may it has problems, but this way is definitely not a coastline.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2024-04-21 11:35:23+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=20/59.36898/24.64031
bicycle=yes on the way and bicycle=dismount on cycle barriers contradict each other. 

If cycling is forbidden, then it's not only at barriers. If it's just hard, but not forbidden, then barrier by itself is enough, not need for access tags on it.