piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Mex (2025-12-18 13:50:01+00:00): This change deleted a bunch of roads, I've reverted this change and will look to fix the issue, looks like you were trying to fix a dragged node, and instead removed the whole road.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176035511
eggie (2025-12-17 08:15:04+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback   De info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Frans S (2025-12-17 16:19:51+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
A remark.Please do not include the shadow into a mapping.
Best regards
FraukeLeo (2026-07-12 11:55:26+00:00): Hallo söm4324, ist das wirklich ein ausgewachsener Fernmeldeturm (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:man%20made=communications%20tower?uselang=de) oder doch eher ein simpler Funkmast (man_made=mast)?
söm4324 (2026-07-12 12:18:33+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13382816245/history ?
Eher ein Funkmast. Hab's geändert
FraukeLeo (2026-07-12 15:23:22+00:00): Danke!
eggie (2025-12-17 08:17:58+00:00): Welkom bij OSM,

De info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode.

MVG
eggie
totera (2025-12-17 20:58:42+00:00): La rotatoria da te mappata non è stata inaugurata ieri ma nel 2024.
L'articolo si riferisce a un altro incrocio lungo la SS81, oltre 10 km più a sud: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/42.612985/13.761642
totera (2025-12-31 00:22:11+00:00): Direi che abbiamo anche un problema con il senso unico: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28659833/history/49
SekeRob (2026-01-09 02:42:36+00:00): 3 weeks later corrected most incl wrong oneway direction on rb flare.
Wanderer2000 (2025-12-17 08:03:50+00:00): Nog wat leesvoer: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history

Als je van bijv een halte een area maakt, terwijl het nu een lijn is, is het beter om de lijn te uit te breiden naar een area.
Taurus3 (2025-12-17 16:01:50+00:00): Thanks voor je hulp! :)
NeisBot (2025-12-17 19:39:07+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 39 potential crossings.

Problematic elements (top 3 by category):
https://osm.org/way/1025961891 v2 | 5 crossings
https://osm.org/way/284359616 v6 | 4 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1121199184 v6 | 3 crossings

Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/9459091788 v3
https://osm.org/node/2881009755 v3
https://osm.org/node/2881009783 v4

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=176036948
NeisReview (2026-01-03 12:15:28+00:00): ✅ Should by fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/176037951 | Thx @maksimileeuhn
Hufkratzer (2025-12-18 00:07:19+00:00): Hi,
two years ago we had already discussed that riding arenas and horse walkers are not horse riding centres (leisure=horse_riding):
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144858869
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144858341
Paddocks and small buildings are also not horse riding centres.

It seems that you forgot, because you have now tagged new ones with leisure=horse_riding again:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1459221854
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1459264444
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1459223304
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1459222243
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1459223143
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1459222367
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1459222487

It would be nice if you could correct this, because otherwise it is a bad example for others who might imitate it if they do not inform themselves in the wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a#Riding_centre_(equestrian)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/632271037/history#map=18/50.654421/4.321039&layers=P (example)
Bear-in-a-box (2025-12-18 09:14:57+00:00): Hi,
two years ago!!! MAN!!! I barely remember what was 2 month ago.

But thanks for the tip. I think I adapted most tags according to your instructions. Cheers mate.
Hufkratzer (2025-12-18 19:22:51+00:00): Then I look forward to removing more leisure=horse_riding tags from horse walkers n the future like here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176109937

But perhaps iD will get a preset for horse walkers:
https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/1857
Bear-in-a-box (2025-12-19 07:38:32+00:00): Guys, I don't want to be rude. These tags etc..., this is very complex for me. I will not remember it. 
So maybe you could change it yourself? instead of writing long comments, why not just change the tags?
this is not to be meant in a rude way, just to find a very practical solution for everyone
NeisBot (2025-12-17 19:36:59+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Storage facility in Burnaby BC"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
user_5359 (2025-12-18 11:16:41+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1454589568, https://www.osm.org/way/1454589571. What is the mean of the tag 20.12 = 20.12?
BCNorwich (2025-12-19 07:11:03+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Please take a little time to learn how to properly use/add to the OSM database. Many guides are available.

Way: 1459227951 and Way: 1459227952 have been deleted as they duplicate existing highways causing disruption to routing.

 Way: 604458213 has been reverted back to secondary highway, it's not a motorway.

Regards Bernard,
Gregory Peony (2025-12-18 02:20:11+00:00): Hi, so of the footprints you added here represent buildings, but around half do not. cross reference Mapbox in this area using check the shortcuts `?` to se how to toggle imagery in ID. See how I mapeed some of these in https://osmcha.org/changesets/176072636

Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176038341
NorthCrab_upload (2025-12-20 05:22:39+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/937064174

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2025-12-20 05:42:08+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/937064174

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eggie (2025-12-17 09:07:59+00:00): Dag Gijsbert,

Scherp gezien.
Ik heb de uitzonderingen voor tweewielers verwijderd.

MVG
eggie
gscscnd (2025-12-23 20:17:06+00:00): Wydaje się zbędne.
eggie (2025-12-17 09:28:37+00:00): Dag Pr  Je vraagt feedback.  
Bos is oke.. Heb het wel verbonden met het watervlak. 
Zou dat een bruggetje in dat voetpad aan de oostzijde?

Klopt die retainingwall wel bij die sloot.
Zijn dat muurtje ipv een talud?

MVG
eggie
Pr166 (2025-12-17 10:37:37+00:00): "retaining wall": er zit een oeverbeschoeing aan de kant van de sloot ter hoogte van de woningen (Grote Wiel en Ringslang) - ter hoogte van de bosgebieden naast de woningen zitten perkoenpalen (10 cm boven wateropp). Aan de niet-woningkant van de sloot is er geen oeverscheiding.
Pr166 (2025-12-17 10:44:16+00:00): Hoi eggie, in het voetpad dat over de sloot loopt, ligt een bruggetje van beton. Groet.
eggie (2025-12-17 10:49:04+00:00): Oke.. maak je er zelf een brug van?
.. bridge=yes
.. layer=1

En dan eronder een vlak natural=water

Mapse
Pr166 (2025-12-17 10:52:04+00:00): haha - dat lijkt me een goede oefening
eggie (2025-12-17 10:54:35+00:00): Mooi.. wel even dat pad splitsen op twee plaatsen.. anders wordt de brug heel lang.
Pr166 (2025-12-17 11:12:11+00:00): ik kan niet goed vinden hoe ik de weg kan splitsen (heb de twee eindpunten van de brug geselecteerd). heb je een tip of een link?
eggie (2025-12-17 11:39:20+00:00): Hier een handleiding 
basisbewerkingen iD
https://learnosm.org/nl_NL/beginner/id-editor/#basisbewerkingen-met-id


Ik gebruik die editor nooit. Zelf gebruik ik editor JOSM. iD heb ik nog nooit gebruikt. 
Volgens mij een node toevoegen. Dan die node selecteren. Rechts klikken.. dan krijg je een menu.
Daar staat de mogelijkheid bij 'weg splitsen'. 
Succes
eggie (2025-12-17 11:41:19+00:00): Rechts klikken en dan in het menu kiezen voor het schaartje.
Pr166 (2025-12-17 16:28:05+00:00): Hoi eggie, brug staat er. heb het water verlengd, maar eigenlijk zouden de twee waterstukken prima samengevoegd kunnen worden (idem met een enkele bosgebieden). Dat lukt nu echter niet.
user_22414150 (2025-12-18 21:35:42+00:00): What is resource you are using to add the bank..?
ilias_ (2025-12-18 21:49:07+00:00): What are you talking about? Nobody added a bank, it was already there, I simply upgraded its missing tags. You're just commenting to comment.
user_22414150 (2025-12-19 06:16:21+00:00): Then why you're commenting me my every changesets..?
timstreetmap (2025-12-17 09:19:38+00:00): source ist falsch, sorry
ilias_ (2025-12-17 11:02:08+00:00): Merci de ne pas utiliser un titres erroné comme مدرسة ابتدائية alors que tu modifies une rue et non pas une école.

Merci également de ne pas nommer les rues en majuscules RUE 12 mais plutôt Rue 12.
ilias_ (2025-12-17 11:01:07+00:00): Merci d’utiliser le format +212 et d’utiliser phone au lieu de contact:phone. Merci également de répondre aux commentaires et aux messages.
Dodko (2025-12-17 13:26:49+00:00): Bolo to chybne, opravil som.
Lubomir Kukuca (2025-12-18 14:39:41+00:00): ok, vdaka.
JoeG (2025-12-31 00:15:10+00:00): Hi! This one has 4 deleted footway=sidewalk
mueschel (2025-12-18 10:46:38+00:00): 

Hi,
please don't dump data from external sources into OSM.
All these waterways have a large number of foreign tags that should not be in OSM.

Please read our import guidelines:
osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines
ivanbranco (2025-12-18 10:59:55+00:00): Allego linee guida in lingua italiana: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Import/Guidelines

Tra i vari punti fare particolare attenzione a quello riguardante le licenze, se la licenza dei dati della regione Liguria non è compatibili, i dati non possono essere importati nemmeno seguendo le linee guida.
Filippo Arnaldi (2025-12-21 08:27:29+00:00): Sono d’accordo: le linee guida sono chiare, senza una licenza compatibile i dati non possono essere importati, nemmeno seguendo la procedura.

Nel caso specifico del dataset della Regione Liguria, però, la licenza è esplicitamente indicata come Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0): accanto al download è presente il link diretto alla licenza
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Devo modificare i tag?
mueschel (2025-12-21 08:50:22+00:00): cc-by-4.0 is not suitable for OSM.
https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/03/17/use-of-cc-by-data/

You need to obtain a special permission using e.g. this letter:
https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Waiver_and_Permission_Templates/Cover_letter_and_waiver_template_for_CC_BY_4.0
Filippo Arnaldi (2025-12-21 09:16:00+00:00): Thank you for the reference. I am aware of the OSMF position regarding the use of CC BY data and the related permission template.

Given the scale of the import and in order to avoid any uncertainty, I am considering reverting the imported geometries and then redrawing them manually using only OSM-approved sources, so that no additional formal permissions are required.
mueschel (2025-12-22 16:05:46+00:00): I agree that a revert is the proper way to proceed.
silversurfer83 (2025-12-18 07:35:19+00:00): Moin,

hab mal das Wiki befragt. Grundsätzlich dürfte deine Art der Erfassung ausreichend sein. 

Grüße
Jakka (2025-12-17 13:44:24+00:00): * https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property
NeisBot (2025-12-17 19:37:14+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Moving and storage company"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
FajrAl (2025-12-17 12:05:55+00:00): Untuk memberi nama jalan, gunakan tag atau kolom name=*
RKhabib (2025-12-17 12:15:49+00:00): sorry I forgot to do it, thank you
TrickyFoxy (2026-01-07 00:59:16+00:00): Что вы хотели здесь отметить?
NorthCrab_upload (2025-12-20 05:22:24+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13383102017
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13383102057

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2025-12-20 05:42:00+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13383102017
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13383102057

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2025-12-20 05:22:29+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1389652670

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2025-12-20 05:42:02+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1389652670

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Angelo Giuseppe (2026-01-04 17:12:17+00:00): Fonte survey:d'altra Genesi
Deleted
eggie (2025-12-17 10:58:17+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback Het zou zomaar kunnen, maar hoe ga je nu op de fiets van noord naar zuid. Daar heb je ook een stukje fietspad in voetpad veranderd.
Je voetpad loopt nu de hoek om?
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-12-17 11:15:40+00:00): Het stukje 'fietspad' heb ik weer aangepast naar G11. Het zal anders niet routeren hier. 
Gr eggie
pitscheplatsch (2025-12-19 16:47:09+00:00): Hallo, willkommen bei OSM.

Die hier von dir vorgenommenen Änderungen waren nur zum Testen? Falls ja, kannst du es bitte wieder in den ursprünglichen Zustand zurückversetzen?

Danke und Grüße
pitscheplatsch (2026-01-08 13:59:35+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176214045
stasiu512 (2025-12-17 21:15:02+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
pitscheplatsch (2025-12-19 16:47:14+00:00): Hallo, willkommen bei OSM.

Die hier von dir vorgenommenen Änderungen waren nur zum Testen? Falls ja, kannst du es bitte wieder in den ursprünglichen Zustand zurückversetzen?

Danke und Grüße
pitscheplatsch (2026-01-08 13:58:59+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176214045
AndreaDp271 (2025-12-17 13:28:34+00:00): Perché hai cancellato https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1382088228 ???
voschix (2025-12-17 15:52:38+00:00): Errore mio - volevo solo cambiare da cycleway a footway, ma ho tolto tutto. Questa stretta striscia di asfalto è presente sul lato est di Via San Pio X fra le due rotonde, é utilizzabile in bici, ma non è una cycleway. Farò il revert in questo senso. Sul lato opposto la mappa mostra una ciclopedonale. E' piu larga, ma anche questa non è segnalata come CICLO-pedonale sul terreno. dovrebbe diventare una footway con bicycle=permissive, se sei d'accordo.
user_5359 (2025-12-18 10:51:01+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1459250264 (One of nearly a hundred objects). What is the mean of the tags
artificial = F
cod = R45500400108000000
id = 6435010
natura = 1
ogr_fid = 25088
origine = 2
sottopasso = N
tipo_eleme = 1
tipo_ramo = 1
?
pitscheplatsch (2025-12-19 16:47:20+00:00): Hallo, willkommen bei OSM.

Die hier von dir vorgenommenen Änderungen waren nur zum Testen? Falls ja, kannst du es bitte wieder in den ursprünglichen Zustand zurückversetzen?

Danke und Grüße
pitscheplatsch (2026-01-08 13:59:16+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176214045
osmviborg (2025-12-17 12:43:18+00:00): Hej, rigtig meget af det som bliver tilføjet OSM sker på baggrund af luftfotos, set fra den vinkel er der her en sti/vej som ikke er tegnet. Det havde været bedre at tagge stien som privat/fjernet. Ved at slette den kan den blive tilføjet igen, ikke alle er lokalkendte.
Patchanka (2026-03-04 08:49:02+00:00): attention tu as perdu des morceaux de bâtiments dans cette histoire ^^
J'ai remis les morceaux manquants !
pitscheplatsch (2025-12-19 16:47:28+00:00): Hallo, willkommen bei OSM.

Die hier von dir vorgenommenen Änderungen waren nur zum Testen? Falls ja, kannst du es bitte wieder in den ursprünglichen Zustand zurückversetzen?

Danke und Grüße
pitscheplatsch (2026-01-08 13:03:49+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176264474
eggie (2025-12-17 11:09:12+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  Je hebt van een boomgaard een wel heel groot gebouw gemaakt. 
Wellicht bedoel je leisure=hors_riding
Zie wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dhorse_riding
Je edits 
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=176044163

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-12-17 11:13:17+00:00): Ik heb het gebouw vervangen als bovenstaand. 
Op de lucgtfoto os geen spoor van een stalgebouw te zien.
CTRL-F5 voor het effect
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-12-17 11:24:59+00:00): typo  Op de luchtfoto is...
SomeoneElse (2025-12-20 19:50:33+00:00): Hello,
There's still a bit of a gap in section 2 of the London LOOP: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3308902#map=15/51.40058/0.08141 .  Previously it ran on this alighnment: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2hBx .
Best Regards,
Andy
NeisBot (2025-12-17 19:37:22+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Self storage on Fairbank Avenue"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
rempshaener (2025-12-18 18:57:18+00:00): Hallo,
eine Anmerkung zu deinen Änderungen:
Gebäudenummern sind in der Regel kein "name" , sondern "ref".
In OSM wird nicht abgekürzt, d. h. wenn schon, dann bitte als "Gebäude" ausschreiben.
Viele Grüße
FeetAndInches (2026-02-15 19:53:53+00:00): Hi there! I passed by in-person, and it looks like the long north-south road that cuts through the park in this changeset is either still under construction or is being rebuilt. In any case, it is not passable by car in February 2026. I know that you can't share private lyft data or imagery, but I am curious how you mapped this road. Perhaps its tags should be changed for the time being.
alokchauhan_Lyft (2026-02-17 16:13:26+00:00): Hi FeetAndInches,
My name is Alok and I’m a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. Thank you for reaching out!
The recent addition was made based on Lyft-owned telemetry data (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1wyBz1772hiJzB6JiApRgt-zREmtYAXcW/view?usp=sharing), which is from 2 weeks ago &  confirming active presence in the detected territory. Additionally, Mapillary imagery (https://drive.google.com/file/d/18Qs5o1-zeFi2RCwXjnh_7qBp_nXibfMu/view?usp=sharing) dated February 15, 2026, indicates the way is accessible to everyone, with no visible construction elements. I hope this explains the rationale behind my edits.

If you’ve recently been onsite and noticed any changes or construction, you’re welcome to revise the edits as needed.

Happy Mapping!
Regards,
Alok
FeetAndInches (2026-02-17 23:48:14+00:00): Lol, that's my own mapillary imagery :P The bit you highlighted is paved for maybe 100 or 200 feet, and then becomes not much more than tire tracks through dirt. I'll come back the next time I'm in this part of town and try to get better imagery of this area specifically.

Thanks for your response,

Feet
FeetAndInches (2026-03-02 20:51:04+00:00): Hi Alok,

Here is a good image from Panoramax. After a short paved segment, most of the road becomes unfinished. There are temporary street lamps and speed limit sign, and construction supplies are arranged by the sides of the road. At least for now, I'm going to tag this as a road under construction.

https://panoramax.openstreetmap.fr/?s=fp;s2;pac1d8aa4-5556-4222-bba7-6c716fb06e75;c188.36/-4.01/30;m18.96/42.498053/-92.4011562;bs

Thanks,

Feet
alokchauhan_Lyft (2026-03-05 04:19:18+00:00): Hello FeetAndInches,

Based on the image you shared, it appears that after approximately 150 feet, the road transitions into an unpaved or dirt surface. I agree that the rest of the area shouldn’t be mapped right now but your updates to the road as construction details are good too.
Thanks for your valuable contribution to OSM!

Thanks,
Alok
Marc_ch (2025-12-29 19:04:58+00:00): Bonjour,
une fois de plus je te demande de cesser de dégrader osm avec les données officielles quand celle-ci sont différente du terrain.
par ex il n'existe pas de Route En Sibourg sur le terrain, c'est "En Sibourg"
le nom officiel était correctement renseigné dans official_name en suivant les conventions en Suisse.
le nom du terrain n'est pas un nom alternatif.
de même il n'existe pas de village nomé St-Aubin FR.
non seulement l'abréviation n'a pas sa place dans name, mais en plus, ca c'est une des représentations du nom officiel avec l'annotation du canton.
si tu demandes à un habitant le nom du village, il te répondra Saint-Aubin 
En espérant me faire comprendre,
Salutations,
Marc
Wikilux (2025-12-31 10:27:11+00:00): Marc, je respecte que les noms officiel, sauf s'il s'agit clairement d'un erreur (très rare). Sur osm, on ne bricole pas avec les noms selon le goût individuel.
the_third_man (2025-12-17 13:32:03+00:00): If the AED is located inside the building, how is access ensured? Is the building not locked, for example, at night?

"description" contains the same information as "operating_hours," so there's duplicate information. Please delete one.

Best regards