piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
BCNorwich (2024-02-22 08:42:28+00:00): Hi, Just to let you know that roads have been moved off of alignment near the new bridge Way: 1253207911

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2024-02-22 08:51:36+00:00): Hi, Way: 1253207941 removed as it is duplication.

Regards Bernard.
Eman Ghareeb (2024-02-22 14:55:56+00:00): Hello BC Norwich; 
I fixed this issue.
Please check this link:
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/1253207911
Regards
Eman Ghareeb
BCNorwich (2024-02-22 15:34:03+00:00): Hi, Yes you have certainly removed the highway that zig zagged and at north duplicated anotherhighway. I take it then that there was not two highways or a dual carriageway. 

The concern now is the bridge you've also removed. The imagery seems to show a bridge over Wadi Jawf. The highway does cross the wadi, do you know if there is a ford or a bridge? OSM should show how the road crosses the wadi,

Regards Bernard.
Eman Ghareeb (2024-02-26 07:44:28+00:00): Hello BC Norwich;
We checked this bridge,
 Indeed, there was a bridge on Al Jawf Road, but the Ford is on the construction road (way 1254370301).
 Based on Maxar SecureWatch Imagery  2023-07-31.
So, I updated it accordingly.
Please check this link:
https://dev.overpass-api.de/achavi/index.html?changeset=147883542
Regards
Eman Ghareeb
BCNorwich (2024-02-26 08:45:18+00:00): Hi Eman, 
Looks all good now exactly what I thought from imagery. I'm not local though so I was reluctant to map itas such.

Regards & Thanks Bernard.
Eman Ghareeb (2024-02-26 13:18:45+00:00): Thank you!
ivanbranco (2024-03-04 10:50:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted with changeset/148183851
nurdafur (2025-03-29 17:40:45+00:00): Hallo Natura
Du hast in diesem Changeset den Kreisverkehr aufgespalten. Ich nehme an, du hast die Busrouten bearbeitet.
Durch den Kreisverkehr führen auch noch 6 Radrouten. Bei diesen braucht es dann immer ein role=forward an den einzelnen Segmenten des Kreisverkehrs für jede Route. Zum Schluss ist auch noch die Reihenfolge der einzelnen Segmente eventuell zu korrigieren.
Verläuft eine Route nur in eine Richtung (signed_direction=yes), dann sind die überzähligen Segmente von der Route zu entfernen. 
Ich habe dies gerade eben für die Radrouten hier erledigt.
Liebe Grüße und weiterhin viel Spaß beim Kartografieren 
Urs
Natura (2025-03-30 09:41:27+00:00): Danke: hatte damals die Relation des R1 aktualisiert, weil die Routenführung per Wegweiser geändert wurde. 
Da die anderen 5 Radrouten identisch verlaufen, diese natürlich auch mitgenommen.
Filip009 (2024-02-24 08:50:01+00:00): Zdravím, vidím, že sa snažíte o aktualizáciu MHD v Prešove. Odporúčam pozrieť si túto wiki stránku https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bratislava#Mestsk%C3%A1_hromadn%C3%A1_doprava

Taktiež odporúčam JOSM editor, v ktorom sa s reláciami pracuje lepšie.

A odporúčam túto stránku, na ktorej vidno, ktorá relácia má nejakú chybu https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=21.25472&lat=48.99376&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=ptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes
nurdafur (2024-02-21 10:54:56+00:00): Hallo Okuw
Was für ein Verkehrszeichen ist an den Wegen, die du zu Radwegen geändert hast?
Es scheint mir aus der Ferne, dass das gemeinsame Rad- und Fußwege sind mit dem Zeichen 2.40. in diesem Fall ist definitiv highway=path mit foot und bicycle=designated und segregated=no korrekt. Das macht teilweise  einen Unterschied in der Darstellung auf den Karten. Bei highway=cycleway wird der Weg als prioritär Radweg mit Vorrang für Räder dargestellt. Bei highway=path sind Fussgänger und Radfahrer gleichberechtigt.
Liebe Grüße
Nur
Đuro Jiří (2024-03-07 07:13:10+00:00): Ciao valentina13,
perché, secondo te , stabilimento balneare si chiama "Ufficio 18" e no "Pesce Palla" come è indicato sul sito web?
https://lignanosabbiadoro.it/it/strutture/156-18-pesce-palla/
Ufficio 17 e no Leone Marino?
https://lignanosabbiadoro.it/it/strutture/155-17-leone-marino/
Ufficio 11 e no Aragosta?
https://lignanosabbiadoro.it/it/strutture/151-11-aragosta/
Ufficio 10 e no Delfino?
https://lignanosabbiadoro.it/it/strutture/150-10-delfino/
Ufficio 7 e no Foca?
https://lignanosabbiadoro.it/it/strutture/147-7-foca/
Ufficio 6 e no Pinguino?
Ufficio 5 e no Pescecane?
https://lignanosabbiadoro.it/it/strutture/145-5-pescecane/

E mio consiglio,a Lignano Sabbiadoro è meglio utilizzare immagini Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta e no Bing Maps Aerial, visto che città è allineata secondo immagini Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta.
Saluti e grazie per la risposta
valentina13 (2024-03-07 08:24:25+00:00): I nomi legati agli animali marini erano stati utilizzati in passato per aiutare i bambini a non perdersi. In ogni ufficio spiaggia c'era un cartellone con l'animale assegnatogli,  venivano poi consegnati dei braccialetti ai bimbi così se si perdevano potevano essere riaccompagnati facilmente all'ufficio spiaggia corretto. 
Oramai, però, questi riferimenti non esistono più negli uffici spiaggia quindi non è corretto chiamarli con i nomi degli animali marini.
bxl-forever (2024-02-21 11:55:24+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM.

You might understand that when a new account drops dozens of new objects onto the map, it raises some legitimate suspicion.

Would you please be so kind to briefly explain what is the source of all the footpaths you have been adding in this airport?  I see that you did similar edits for other airports in the US.
Did you survey this personally?  Or did you obtain the floor plan?

Is this kind of indoor mapping part of an organized activity?  I am asking because there are some caveats here, e.g. unconnected footways, which we’d like to solve or remove, but I am asking if you are developing an app or something that specifically requires those.

You seem to be mastering some tags in the OSM data model fairly well, I suspect you are not a beginning mapper.  Is this the secondary account of someone?

Thanks in advance.  Have a nice day.
adevas (2024-02-22 06:45:45+00:00): "Hello, appreciate you addressing the concern. We're currently engaged in editing OSM maps as part of the Uber OSM Project. For more details, you can refer to the following link: https://github.com/Uber-OSM/Global.

Apologies for not updating my profile earlier; it's now up to date. Additionally, I've created an indoor map of the airport based on the official website's map.

Website Link :"https://www.ifly.com/airports/brussels-airport/terminal-map
bxl-forever (2024-02-22 09:20:09+00:00): Thanks for your reply.

We may not use copyrighted sources on OSM, and it looks like the material on their website has such copyright restrictions.

Did you sollicitate and aquire permission to reproduce their map for OSM?
joost schouppe (2024-03-07 10:35:24+00:00): This changeset was reverted here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1253208536 ; both because of large errors in the content, as well as the unaddressed copyright issue. I've also pointed out this changeset to the DWG, as it is potentially troublesome if large scale organized mapping efforts do not properly deal with the use of copyrighted materials. Not saying this necessarily happened here, but it has not yet been confirmed that there was indeed permission.
adevas (2024-03-28 06:27:23+00:00): Hi  bxl-forever, we're very happy to be helping improve OSM and contribute to the community with this additional information. We wanted to clarify that we manually created all the footpaths on our own. We didn't copy the website.The website doesn't have any footpaths. We hope this resolves any confusion. Also We use our internal sources to create all these, please let us know which large errors you are referring to so we can look into these more.
Noktoborus (2024-03-08 12:21:01+00:00): Здравствуйте!

Для чего была добавлена
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1253209800 ?
Дорога в этом месте не имеет физических разделителей и направлена только в одну сторону. Разделения такой дороги на два highway только усложняет навигацию на ней. 

Не могли бы Вы соединить highway по улице Туманяна на этом участке обратно в один?

Дополнительно, будьте внимательны при расставлении точек highway=traffic_signals при разделении путей, некоторые поставленные highway=traffic_signals оказывались на одном highway дважды, когда на highway встречного направления - ни одного.
Noktoborus (2024-03-08 12:22:34+00:00): И не могли бы вы описывать свои правки чуть большим количеством слов на любом удобном Вам языке?  Описание "исправление" не добавляет никакой ясности к сделанному в правке.
Noktoborus (2024-03-09 05:03:08+00:00): Вернул 
один путь в пакете правок https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148408774

Обратите внимание, что разделив дороги Вы сделали невозможной прямой проезд из подземной парковки ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/57882781 ) на улицу Езника Кохбаци ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/712289530 ), такого запрета нет на местности.

Так же, будьте внимательны при разделении highway и обращайте внимание на теги "lanes", "lanes:turn".

Например, добавив https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1253209801 Вы не исправили lanes=4 на встречном направлении ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/379702959 ).
Noktoborus (2024-03-09 05:06:19+00:00): Постарайтесь удержаться от разделения highway на два без веских причин, таких как:
- физический барьер
- сложность поддержки большого количества ограничений проезда (restriction)
- очень широкая дорога (5 и больше полос) при условии наличия движения в две стороны.
Enock4seth (2024-04-17 06:36:07+00:00): Hi, thanks for mapping. Goods and services about computers or electronics?

Is this shop always open? 24/7?
user_11609320 (2024-02-21 09:51:19+00:00): they are grading for  warehouses
user_11609320 (2024-02-21 10:01:56+00:00): i don't think they are going to build the short track
eggie (2024-02-21 10:41:51+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback   Tip.. Nooit naar de daken kijken op een schuin genomen luchtfoto. Dat is niet de vorm van de woning.
Ik zal de vorm weer herstellen.


MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-02-21 10:45:49+00:00): reverted by changeset #147727342
Luzandro (2024-05-07 04:33:21+00:00): siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4187553
rayth (2024-05-09 19:56:28+00:00): Please use building=commercial instead of landuse=* next time :]
literan (2024-02-24 13:35:32+00:00): зачем вы тут ставите на часть здания тег brand=Пятерочка? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/48585270/history

вы полагаете, что это бренд данной постройки?
pyrog (2025-06-19 07:06:24+00:00): Les conventions/usages dans OSM en France conseillent de ne pas mettre de majuscules aux articles.
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2025-06-19 07:15:01+00:00): Bonjour,

Merci pour votre alerte
Cela a été corrigé dans nos outils

Cordialement,
L'Equipe DB
dankarran (2024-02-21 11:54:41+00:00): Is the northern half of the site actually the "adjacent gas pressure reduction station owned by Cadent" mentioned on the Beckton CHiP website?
Mikey Co (2024-02-21 16:44:44+00:00): I don't know. I've no idea whether the pipework to the north is that pressure reduction station, and it's not somewhere you can get close up to.
dankarran (2024-02-21 21:06:27+00:00): I found a planning application (19/01931/FUL) which shows the CHiP plant as being the lower half, so I've update the top half to show the Cadent plant.
Mikey Co (2024-02-21 21:26:18+00:00): Thanks!
eggie (2024-02-21 10:44:28+00:00): Beste Siel   Wanneer je building= yes verwijderd zul je geen gebouw meer zien op de kaart.


https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=147726677

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-02-21 10:49:47+00:00): Vlak playground op playground heb ik hersteld. Er was al een speeltuintje hier ingetekend. 
Gebouw weer hersteld met building =yes
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-02-21 11:55:46+00:00): Alle begin is moeilijk. 
Vakantiecentrum Sonnevanck stond al op het vlak.. Ik heb de dubbele vermelding verwijderd. Een camping in een camping geeft een foutmelding. 
De trampoline is dat een openbare speeltuin? Zo niet beter verwijderen. . 

MVG
eggie
Vinber-Pro (2024-03-01 09:00:04+00:00): Bonjour,
pourquoi source:date=2017 ? c'est l'installation ?

sans doute plutôt alors start_date=*

on ne discute si besoin :)

bonne carto
fortera_au (2024-03-03 09:44:51+00:00): Hi, is the start_date accurate or even needed for this? Did this business actually open on New Years Day 2010?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147727116
Donat sf (2024-02-21 10:48:49+00:00): good
user_17222985 (2024-02-22 06:02:07+00:00): насправді дорога
KasperSFranz (2024-02-21 15:38:55+00:00): Hi,
Why is it required to add Great Britain to the road names? 
It seems not to have any value, should all the Motoways be updated as well?
Paul Berry (2024-02-21 16:50:13+00:00): It's only on the relation name, not the members of the relation. It's so the relation is unambiguous at the global level and brings it in line with others such as the A10, A14, A41, etc...

The motorway relations already have this naming covnention.
Flamen_Sru (2024-05-21 10:54:40+00:00): Hello Alex_DSt
Thank you for mapping!
I changed highway classification from unclassified to track on ways:  481279337, 1253228860, 481280358,  481280361,  481280356, 481280353, 481281640, 481281638, 481279338
Please inspect your task carefully before closing.
Happy Mapping!
Xvtn (2024-02-28 16:33:13+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! It looks like this feature (Body Rock Sculpting Med Spa) might be misplaced or spam, based on the street address. Can you double check it?
eggie (2024-02-21 12:37:14+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback:  Lijkt me oke om de parkeerplaats weg te halen.
Een balk wordt vaak getagd op een node met barrier=log
Dan wel bicycle=yes en foot=yes toevoegen. 
Is de slagboom er nog wel? 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Cattalanka (2024-02-21 15:45:00+00:00): Hallo,
De slagboom is er.
Is afsluiting Oude Postbaan via Galderseweg.
Fietsers en voetgangers kunnen er langs.

MVG,
Cattalanka
eggie (2024-02-21 16:09:16+00:00): Oke.. dan zal het naar behoren routeren..
Mvg
eggie
Jordi MF (2024-02-21 23:38:43+00:00): Hola Elchesemueve,

Siento decirlo, pero la etiqueta "website=*" debe usarse únicamente para añadir enlaces a páginas web oficiales, lo cual no se cumple con la web www.elchesemueve.com y los centros socioculturales dependientes del Ayuntamiento de Elche.
Saludos.
BCNorwich (2024-02-22 08:49:41+00:00): Hi, Way: طريق الجوف (1253207914)
and Way: طريق الجوف (154265995)
 are joined together at the north end. Are there 1 or 2 highways, is it a dual carriageway?
Could you please correct this as it will disrupt routing.

Regards Bernard.
Eman Ghareeb (2024-02-22 15:00:19+00:00): Hello BC Norwich; 
I fixed these issues.
Please check these links:
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/1253207914
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/154265995
Regards
Eman Ghareeb
Marek-M (2024-02-22 09:11:51+00:00): Cześć, proszę, nie tworzyć zbędnych łuków na liniach highway. Skrzyżowanie Al. Grunwaldzkiej i Związku Jaszczurzego https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1753964230 było stworzone jako bardzo długi łuk, gdy drogi w rzeczywistości są prostopadłe. Nawigacje takiego skrzyżowania nie mogą poprawnie interpretować i nie powiedzą 'skręć w prawo' tylko 'trzymaj się prawej'. Dodatkowo tworzenie zbędnych punktów na liniach highway, które można tworzyć jako proste linie też jest błędne. Każdy taki punkt jest później przeliczany przez routingi co zajmuje dodatkowy czas.

Zrobiłem poprawki w changeset jak to powinno wyglądać https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=147762347

Na grafice zaznaczyłem punkty:

* Punkty 3, 4, 5 to błędne łuki na skrzyżowaniach.
* Punkt 2 to rozdzielenie jezdni, które powinno być w pobliżu fizycznego rozdziału drogi a nie tam gdzie jest linia ciągła
* Punkt 1, to nieprawidłowe połączenie obiektów na różnych layer - przepust jest na layer=-1, droga domyślnie na layer=0 ale miały tutaj punkty wspólne.

https://i.imgur.com/vjJXz09.png
NorthCrab_upload (2024-02-21 12:10:30+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11648966591
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/400631777

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
santamariense (2024-10-25 02:51:01+00:00): Olá.

Estive revisando sua edição. Instruções de aprimoramento:
* A via deve conter o tipo no nome. Se Getúlio Pereira for uma "Rua", o nome no OSM deve ser "Rua Getúlio Pereira".

Querendo tirar dúvidas e engajar com a comunidade, sugiro os canais do Telegram listados nesta wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Canais_para_contato

Bons mapeamentos!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147730245
Dodko (2024-02-22 18:22:39+00:00): Budova 7465 bola zbúraná keď ste ju zrušili?
Tim Grose (2024-03-06 11:49:30+00:00): Hi Whilst I agree Burney Road has signs saying it is a "Private Road" there are no physical access restrictions and in keeping with the guidelines at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access=private?uselang=en#Clarification_of_the_term_%E2%80%9Cprivate%E2%80%9D think this should be marked as ownership=private
Tim Grose (2024-03-06 11:50:58+00:00): ... and so access=yes as normal
pitscheplatsch (2024-02-21 16:35:50+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147732575
woodpeck_repair (2024-02-21 12:36:00+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 147655471, 147656190.
woodpeck (2024-02-24 15:46:50+00:00): Dear user Dinsh, please slow down your AI building mapping. You are adding data of very low quality to OSM, for example in this changeset see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1253258326 which is totally wrong. Also none of the buildings you have mapped in this changeset conform to any of the imagery sources you have specified. In the future, it is allowed to use AI-derived buildings but at the very least you should visually inspect if they match aerial imagery. Also there have been complaints that you were mapping buildings that were long demolished so please make sure you use accurate data sources. Thank you - Frederik Ramm, OSMF Data Working Group Ticket Ticket#2024022410000147
ManuelB701 (2024-04-30 09:40:44+00:00): Mal 'ne Frage, da ich nicht aus der Region komme: Du hast ein Gleis als "railway=abandoned" gemappt, aber darauf fuhr ja eine RB und die dazugehörige Relationwurde nicht geändert. Vielmehr aber kommentierte jemand am Hinweis an diesen Gleis (den ich erstellt habe), das diese doch genutzt ist. Ist das Gleis nun aufgegeben oder nicht?
NorthCrab_upload (2024-02-21 13:00:20+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nieprawidłowa wartość addr:postcode. Kod pocztowy powinien być formatu XX-XXX, gdzie X oznacza cyfrę.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11649130976

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, zamień addr:place na addr:city. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11649130976

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
user_12500175 (2024-02-21 13:17:07+00:00): Hallo,
du hast den Turm von building:part zu building geändert. Der Turm gehört aber zur Kirche und besteht aus mehrere Teilen deshalb wäre building:part besser.
Bist du anderer Meinung?
vicente lopez 2021 (2024-02-23 00:08:13+00:00): me ayudas con esto https://prensa.cba.gov.ar/informacion-general/rio-segundo-finalizo-la-duplicacion-de-calzada-a-lo-largo-de-1-750-metros-de-la-ruta-nacional-9/
Frans S (2024-02-24 16:26:42+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Buildings not squared.
Not all round buildings mapped.
Best regards


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
SvenQ (2024-02-25 11:10:53+00:00): Hallo Rhoon,
ich habe heute ganz erstaunt festgestellt, dass auf der Karte die komplette Theodor-Fontane-Straße als fertig dargestellt und auch die Erschließungsabeiten abgeschlossen markiert sind. Woher stammt denn diese Erkenntnis.

Ich war vorgestern das letzte Mal in der Gegend unterwegs und da war die Zufahrt von Süden (way 976300876 bis node 9034893807) noch eine Schotterpiste, die erste Zufahrtsstraße auf der westlichen Seite (way 976300867) existiert noch gar nicht, was auch für das Ende der letzten westlichen Zufahrtstraße (way 976300878) gilt, da dort noch ein Regenrückhaltebecken gebaut werden muss.

Zudem ist das ganze Gebiet offiziell noch mit einer Vollscheibe (Zeichen 250) beschildert, die nur Baustellenfahrzeuge ausnimmt. Das access=no zu entfernen ist also (im Sinne der Routenplanung) nicht so ganz zielführend.

Viele Grüße

Sven
Rhoon (2024-02-26 08:28:21+00:00): Hallo Sven, danke für den Hinweis. Hast es ja schonwieder korrigiert, danke. Gerne auch entsprechend in den Tags vermerken (Check-Date, oder Notizen). Da bereits Grundstücksverkäufe und Baustellenbegehungen stattfinden, hielt ich access-no für veraltet.
vg
Rhoon
SvenQ (2024-02-26 08:33:17+00:00): Hallo Rhoon,
in der Tat werden schon Häuser gebaut (die ersten drei hab ich eingetragen), obwohl die Erschließungsarbeiten noch nicht abgeschlossen sind. Das Gebiet ist auch zugänglich aber offiziell mit Schildern und ein paar Zäunen abgesperrt.

Ich behalt die Sache im Auge.

Viele Grüße

Sven
Bienson (2024-02-22 00:28:16+00:00): Hier fehlt der beschreibende Tag:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:office%3Dcompany
mos_next_door (2024-04-12 12:12:08+00:00): Reverted: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149907470
Please stop splitting secondary & tertiary road or at least tag them correctly if you do. Feel free to join the discussion at https://t.me/osm_armenia

Пожалуйста, не нужно делить второстепенные улицы на две части, в крайнем случае хотя бы корректно проставляйте теги на обе половины. Приходите в чат https://t.me/osm_armenia, если хотите обсудить правки.
Bienson (2024-02-22 00:26:19+00:00): Tippfehler:

Blutplassmaspende

Außerdem fehlt der beschreibende Tag:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:healthcare%3Dblood_donation
oktus (2024-03-29 23:32:31+00:00): Czy ta droga jest jednokierunkowa?
pitscheplatsch (2024-02-21 16:35:43+00:00): revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147732575
Bienson (2024-02-22 00:23:13+00:00): Tippfehler:

*49 statt +49
hsc666 (2024-02-21 15:15:24+00:00): Hallo dergreg und willkommen bei OSM!

Eine Frage zu den beiden Umlaufsperren auf dem Femeweg: Befinden sich die Sperren tatsächlich jeweils auf der Kreuzung und sperren dadurch in alle drei Richtungen oder steht das Gitter nicht eher auf dem Verbindungsstück zum Fundermannsweg?

VG
hsc666
dergreg (2024-02-21 15:27:51+00:00): Hi und danke. Die sind tatsächlich nicht direkt auf dem Weg sondern auf den schmalen Verbindungen nur zum Fundermannsweg hin.

Muss da noch etwas üben, sorry. Da gehören sicherlich separate Wegpunkte für hin, das kann ich noch korrigieren.
hsc666 (2024-02-21 15:29:50+00:00): Ja genau, einfach einen neuen Punkt an der richtigen Stelle erzeugen und die Eigenschaften dorthin übertragen. Falls noch Fragen sind, gib einfach Bescheid!