piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2025-10-21 05:57:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description
NeisReview (2025-10-22 15:45:40+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/173634629
rarad74 (2025-10-21 15:46:34+00:00): Salut. Iti recomand sa lasi drumul prin Mizil ca primary pentru o rutare mai echilibrata din care sa isi aleaga fiecare ce ruta doreste. Nu toata lumea o sa doreasca sa fie rutat pe varianta ocolitoare, mult mai lunga. De preferat este drumul drept prin Mizil. Sa mearga pe varianta ocolitoare cine doreste. O seara buna.
Glassman (2025-10-22 02:11:29+00:00): Welcome to OSM. I'm curious, where did you get all this information? I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173565972
watchingthewatcher (2025-11-15 04:42:37+00:00): Thanks for the welcome!  I used a 360 camera and documented from the video.  I'm hoping to do more parts of the city and touch up the couple of entries that looked like cameras, but need more confirmation.
archie (2025-10-21 07:38:52+00:00): Vad menar du med detta(https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1443636555). En badbrygga av trä som är avsedd för cyklar och bilar (designated)? Medan detta i sig redan är märkligt, så finns det inga vägar för bilarna att ta sig fram till "bilbadbryggan".
TrickyFoxy (2025-10-21 19:00:22+00:00): 👋  Не нужно в названия полевых дорог писать какого она типа и в каком селе она находится. У полевых дорог обычно нет названия
Herman Lee (2025-10-21 11:16:20+00:00): 你好，副站名如“杨箕东”请放在alt_name中，不要以主站名（副站名）的形式存在。
站牌展示内容可对应name值：
1. xx（yy）总站 -> xxyy总站
2. xx路（yy）站 -> xx路yy
3. xx（yy）站（yy为无歧义或副站名） -> xx
4. xx（yy）站（平行设置或有歧义） -> xxyy
habi (2025-10-21 07:18:26+00:00): Sorry, the change to the parking in  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/953154094 should not have been in this changeset...
Jrachi (2025-10-22 12:03:03+00:00): Ti ringrazio per aiutare noi poveri nella mappatura.
Ma potresti evitare di rovinare le relazioni escursionistiche?
Josm ti ha sicuramente avvisato che stavi facendo brutte cose!

Ivo
wegavision (2025-10-23 05:29:59+00:00): Devi dirmi esattamente cosa sto sbagliando. Intendi le relazioni? Cerco di stare attento a non cancellarne nessuna, ma quando modifico il tracciato stradale in una rotatoria, spesso elimino delle relazioni.
wegavision (2025-10-23 05:31:12+00:00): Devi dirmi esattamente cosa sto sbagliando. Intendi le relazioni? Cerco di stare attento a non cancellarne nessuna, ma quando modifico il percorso stradale in una rotatoria, spesso devo riorganizzare le relazioni.
LordGarySugar (2025-12-09 19:38:42+00:00): 

This changeset was reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175728513 - please do not delete military base features, they are added from normal aerial imagery and do not contain secret or sensitive information.
LordGarySugar (2025-12-09 19:38:04+00:00): This changeset was reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173623367 - please do not delete military base features, they are added from normal aerial imagery and do not contain secret or sensitive information.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-12-09 22:43:14+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19139
user_5359 (2025-10-25 08:07:02+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1443597214. What is the mean of the tags
11=16?
PizzaTreeIsland (2025-10-21 11:11:25+00:00): Hello, 
Thank you for adding all those details! 
Please note that natural=tree can only be used on individual nodes, not on areas or ways. I fixed this here and at the cementary a few days ago. 

Thanks and happy mapping!
Emilio Gomez (2025-10-21 11:32:22+00:00): Thanks for letting me know!
aharvey (2025-10-27 23:01:56+00:00): the tag nudism=yes already implies this so no need for a note
user_5359 (2025-10-24 11:04:34+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2eg1. What is the mean of the tag
材质 = 防腐木板
?
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-21 08:11:07+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2607397490
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1039020527

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NeisBot (2025-10-21 08:07:34+00:00): Hi human0722, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 99% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 29 highway(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=173569104
GanderPL (2025-10-21 08:21:46+00:00): Dziękuję
NeisBot (2025-10-21 08:12:35+00:00): Hi human0722, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 91% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 24 highway(s)
- 3 building(s)
- 1 natural(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=173569284
pitscheplatsch (2025-10-21 13:51:40+00:00): Hello,

and again: You keep deleting mapped ways and nodes on a large scale.

Could you please answer the questions in the commented changesets?

Thank you.
user_5359 (2025-10-22 08:42:01+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/49138884. What is the mean of the tag m=80?
eggie (2025-10-21 09:48:54+00:00): Welkom bij OSM.. Viswinkel Jan van de Krent zal vast geen garage zijn.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-10-21 09:51:51+00:00): Aangepast naar viswinkel
eggie (2025-10-21 09:54:10+00:00): Dag Kalminion  Foutmeldingen warnings:almost_junction:highway-highway 	1
warnings:crossing_ways:highway-highway 	1

en de fietsroute is hier onderbroken nu.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-10-21 10:19:37+00:00): Parkstadroute hersteld
silversurfer83 (2025-10-21 09:58:40+00:00): Hi :)

Für den "Standort" der Panels haben wir die Eigenschaft "location=*". In diesem Fall sieht es nach "location=roof" aus. Um den Datennutzern die Arbeit zu erleichtern können wir auch die relative Lage zu Objekten an gleicher Stelle angeben: "layer=*". Hier dürfte "layer=1" gut passen.

Bei Fragen immer raus damit
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173569844
goodidea (2025-11-01 00:52:11+00:00): Hallo! Kleine Info: hier hast du aber definitiv mindestens einen Tag zuviel entfernt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1187277784, nämlich leisure=outdoor_seating.

Ich war gestern (31.10.) nochmal dort ... das ist der Außenbereich des Restaurants ... selbst jetzt noch bestuhlt ...

Ich hab es nochmal korrigiert.

(highway=pedestrian etc. würde ich da auch nicht hinzufügen, wäre auch ein unschönes Doppel-Tagging von 2 versch. Features, ich denke, das kann wirklich weg.)

Viele Grüße!
tintinmaster (2025-11-02 16:24:09+00:00): Da ist mir wohl tatsächlich die Maus ausgerutscht. 

Vielen Dank fürs verbessern :)
muralito (2025-10-21 12:09:17+00:00): Hi. Please review this change. You are misreading the imagery, imagery is bad, or you are making wrong asumptions.
LakeChiuta (2025-10-22 17:09:48+00:00): Hi muralito,
I appreciate you reaching out about this. I added the oneway based on arrows visible in imagery, but upon further review I now see there is a separate painted lane for traffic traveling in the opposing direction. I apologize for misinterpreting the imagery, and have removed the oneway. Have a nice day!
literan (2025-10-21 19:57:29+00:00): если школа только строится, то не надо вешать на нее тег школы, т.к. там сейчас не учат детей
SomeoneElse (2025-10-29 21:37:32+00:00): Hello,
I'm guessing that the "highway=#M7" is probably supposed to be some other tag?  I'm not familiar with this sort of thing so alas I've no idea what that might be...
Best Regards,
Andy
Lidon Group (2025-10-30 11:53:45+00:00): Hi Andy
Junction 14 is located off the M7 motorway, is this tag better? regards Rose #M7Motorway
SomeoneElse (2025-10-30 12:08:12+00:00): A "highway" tag in OSM is supposed to have one of these values: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/highway#values .  None of those are hashtags.
Things processing OSM data tend to do spatial searches, so it'll be obvious to them that this fuel pump is within https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/118521382 ("Junction 14 Mayfield") that you added with the website https://junction14mayfield.ie/ - so they'll already know where it is.
Lidon Group (2025-10-30 12:23:27+00:00): ok thanks this is all new to me, appreciate the feedback.
VictorIE (2026-07-23 18:44:22+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11662946790/

This node is very confused and appears to be an ATM merged with a car charger.
NeisBot (2025-10-21 09:03:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisBot (2025-10-21 09:03:44+00:00): Just to help illustrate what I mean, here is how your description could look in a more neutral, factual form: "cabinet de pédicurie podologie du sport spécialisé en analyse 3d du mouvement et impression 3D de semelles orthopédiques"
NeisReview (2025-10-22 15:44:53+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/173572081
taxi301 (2025-10-21 09:52:00+00:00): jak jest dodany numer adresowy  każdej klatki to nie dodajemy do całego budynku jeszcze raz adresów 
addr:housenumber	39 - 39d
SzymonH (2025-10-21 09:08:10+00:00): Kobiałka-Szkoła 51 oczywiście.
mavl (2025-11-15 10:55:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 174681717 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
NeisBot (2025-10-21 09:42:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisBot (2025-10-21 09:42:42+00:00): Just to help illustrate what I mean, here is how your description could look in a more neutral, factual form: "Pittsburgh clinic for plastic surgery"
user_5359 (2025-10-22 07:08:45+00:00): remove advertising: see https://www.osm.org/changeset/173612375
bigopenmac (2025-10-21 13:34:27+00:00): Не мог бы ты пояснить, как ты проверяешь объекты перед удалением? Ты смотришь на местности или в свежем торговом реестре?
Можно ли тебя попросить не удалять точки  c ref:BY:trade_register, а отмечать их как disused? Дело в том что торговый реестр для валидатора обновляется не ежедневно и там еще эти магазины есть (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/99305267) и когда ты удаляешь точку она светится в валидаторе как не найденная.
LidaCity (2025-10-22 10:46:40+00:00): День добрый.
Данные торгового реестра не самые свежие: от 10.10.2025.
У одной организации узнавал, как они удалились из реестра - там работают по заявительному принципу, дали заявку, получили лицензию на торговлю с номером (тот который ref:BY:trade_register).
Захотели  - подали заявку на отзыв - номер из реестра исчезает, и снова никогда не вернётся. Что бы снова продавать - новая заявка (с тем же перечнем продукции, или обновлённым) и новый номер.
Иногда тупят, банкротятся но лицензию не отзывают. Или не отзывая старую пишут новую (например захотели алкогольную продукцию дополнительно продавать), поэтому в реестре одна торговая точка может иметь две (или три) лицензии, которые вроде даже действующие (что неправильно).
Как-то так.

Вот обнаружил контору, которая тут отмечена, а глазами я вижу здание с разобранной крышей. И спросил у знакомого оттуда.

Мне не понравился дизайн валидатора https://mapillaryby.github.io/ShopsValidator/shops.html, поэтому сваял свой вариант ("с блек-джеком и шлюхами"), даже два - один на основе этих данных, второй самостоятельный, на основе почти всех торговых точек (без большого количества ИП, они как то без адресов умудряются торговать, и без обанкротившихся организаций)

Но вашу точку зрения услышал, отныне удалять закрытые магазины не буду.

Ну, и, надеюсь, мы ж мапим не под рендер, ой, тьфу, не под валидатор?
Vodevil_Mark (2025-10-26 10:38:36+00:00): Хочу о том же попросить) не удаляй пожалуйста теги у магазинов с disused:shop=convenience. Я в любом случае, даже если магазин уже закрыт оставляю теги для истории так он до сих пор висит в реестре
pitscheplatsch (2025-10-21 10:12:51+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173573021
Vinber-Pro (2025-10-21 09:43:32+00:00): maladresse de ma part, j'efface en suivant
NeisBot (2025-10-21 09:56:57+00:00): Hallo Simon Thonhauser, herzlich willkommen und vielen Dank für deine Mitarbeit!

Um die Zusammenarbeit zu erleichtern und anderen dabei zu helfen, deine Änderungen zu verstehen, ist es am besten, wenn du eine kurze Beschreibung der von dir vorgenommenen Änderungen hinzufügst. Klar formulierte Kommentare helfen der Gemeinschaft dabei, deiner Arbeit zu folgen und bessere Rückmeldungen zu geben. Hier[1] findest du Tipps zum Schreiben guter Kommentare.

Basierend auf deinen Karteneditierungen in diesem Changeset habe ich einen Vorschlag dafür erstellt, wie ein Kommentar aussehen könnte: "Aktualisierte Namen von Stockerbach, Kahlabachers Ludlbach"
(Auto-translation)
---
Hi Simon Thonhauser, welcome and thanks for your contribution!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

Based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Updated names of Stockerbach, Kahlabachers Ludlbach"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
pitscheplatsch (2025-10-21 10:07:00+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173573182

Also by a new contributor.
pitscheplatsch (2025-10-21 10:09:23+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

May we know the source of this map edit?

Thanks.
pitscheplatsch (2025-10-21 10:09:32+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

May we know the source of this map edit?

Thanks.
pitscheplatsch (2025-10-21 10:09:55+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

May we know the source of this map edit?

Thanks.
Paul Flo Williams (2025-10-28 12:24:23+00:00): Jez, per the wiki, addr:city is the postal city, which is Hove.
Jez Nicholson (2025-11-03 13:37:13+00:00): Hi Paul, There has been a bit of debate on this for B&H since turning into a city. I was originally on the 'Brighton' or 'Hove' camp but got overruled. We will eventually do some mass updates to make it consistent. Alternatively, it ends in an 'edit war' :(
pitscheplatsch (2025-10-21 10:10:22+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

May we know the source of this map edit?

Thanks.
Mathias_ADAV (2025-11-26 10:54:18+00:00): Bonjour, ce sont bien des bandes cyclables tracé dans cette rue ? Ou peut étre seuelemnt des pictogrammes ?
floquet nicolas (2025-11-26 21:27:01+00:00):  voix unique avec bande cyclable inversé https://www.facebook.com/aisnenouvelle/posts/en-travaux-depuis-le-d%C3%A9but-de-l%C3%A9t%C3%A9-la-rue-de-gonnier-est-d%C3%A9sormais-ouverte-%C3%A0-la-/1425283452937957/
Mathias_ADAV (2025-11-27 09:42:53+00:00): Bonjour, merci je vais donc la passer en sens unique (oneway = yes) avec un double sens cyclable en bande (cycleway:left = lane + cycleway:left:oneway = -1 + oneway:bicycle = no)
Udarian (2025-10-21 21:03:33+00:00): can you please check if the sidewalks on the sides of this property have been also completed based on your imagery, essentially is there a sidewalk connection between ways https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1429777600 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1429777603 along with https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1429777612 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1429777603 ?

Happy mapping,
Udar
achauhan_Lyft (2025-10-22 14:10:41+00:00): Hi Udarian,
My name is Amit, and I’m a mapper in the OSM team at Lyft. According to Lyft-owned aerial imagery (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1fkXS8dCY3sDSuXDlOH6V2Dn4ZtAedsq5/view?usp=sharing) dated May 17, 2025, the sidewalk infrastructure between osm.org/way/1429777600
 and osm.org/way/1429777603 has been completed. However, the section between osm.org/way/1429777612 and osm.org/way/1429777603
 remains unfinished. This observation is supported by Lyft-owned street-level imagery  (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1XG_BFa8fkKMyRFIgA6vgNICYstj6IXjO/view?usp=sharing) from July 2025 too. Feel free to reach out for more clarification. 
The screenshots will be available for a month, please let me know if you are unable to view them within this timeframe - I could generate them once again.

Thank you for your contribution.

Thanks
Amit
Udarian (2025-10-22 16:59:51+00:00): Thank you for the response, I will update the relevant sidewalk by the end of the day.

Happy mapping,
Udar.
NeisBot (2025-10-21 10:36:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description
NeisBot (2025-10-21 10:36:42+00:00): Just to help illustrate what I mean, here is how your description could look in a more neutral, factual form: "تابلو برق"
NeisReview (2025-10-26 10:19:58+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/173787199
H4N5-antw (2026-04-29 06:31:56+00:00): Geachte NurDaFur, 

Merkte tijdens plannen fietstocht dat een bepaald pad werd vermeden; al zoekend blijkt dat twee 'ways' wel bewandeld mogen, niet befietst. 

Zie dat u als laatste aan ways https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1113380581/history en 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1176991372/history werkte; 

kunt u aangeven waarom mofa, moped en speed_pedelec hier wel zouden mogen, fietsen niet (zie https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=19/51.174953/4.154026, pick een van beide ways om te bekijken)? 

Was uw edit gebaseerd op uw eigen waarneming ter plaatse, betrof het mogelijk een tijdelijke afsluiting wegens wegenwerken? 

Met overigens vriendelijke groet, en vanzelf dank dat u tijd neemt OSM bij te werken,
Hans
nurdafur (2026-04-29 09:15:57+00:00): Hi Hans
I checked the situation with different routers. Vallhalla, OSMR and GraphHopper have problems with it. Brouter, the app I use for navigation works fine.
The reason for this seems to be, that the highway=cycleway has vehicle=no. This is what is marked on site, with all that other types of vehicles with *=yes.
I expected that highway=cycleway implements bicycle=yes. For some reasons, it is overrouled by vehicle=no.
There is two solutions for this. The easy one is deleting vehicle=no. 
The other solution is adding bicycle=yes. I think this is stupid for a cycleway.

What I just seen while searching the problem is that the adjacent highway=cycleway lack the mofa, moped and speed-pedelec-tags. They might need to be added. As I do not live in Sint-Niklaas or the surrounding, I can not go on site again, to verify the signage. Maybe you could do that.

Kind regards and lots of fun mapping
Urs
dypa (2025-10-21 15:37:31+00:00): Спасибо!
pitscheplatsch (2025-10-21 13:49:13+00:00): Socket puppet? of https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/seizlover/history
kingkingHK (2025-10-21 13:56:03+00:00): If you think Kam Ho Road between Tung Wui Road and Pat Heung Road deserves `highway=secondary`, then definitely so does Tung Wui Road.
vectorial8192 (2025-10-22 11:27:20+00:00): Not really; Kam Ho Road got `=secondary` with precedent (see me trying to demote Old Clear Water Bay Road to `=tertiary` with no success); Kam Sheung Road Station wants strong alternative route to access Route 3.

I think Tung Hui Road is not as important. The new park-and-ride needs the `=primary` section for entrance, and depending on exact destination, exiting  might just make sense to go through Kam Tin Bypass or Pat Heung Road.

Actually, also consider e.g. San Tam Road is "only `=tertiary` when Castle Peak Road is `=secondary`"; feels like a good analogy/perspective for this case.
vectorial8192 (2025-10-22 18:16:27+00:00): Sorry to necro this, but again, you see the new & existing development (Grand Mayfair etc) is currently asymmetric and lopsided: all access must be done via the current `=primary` and `oneway=yes` section. It's obvious both roads have different importance / significance.

But, your point is not without merit. A few years later when the (4? or perhaps more?) residential sites are up and running, then Tung Wui Road will have very strong argument to be `=secondary` by virtue of being "urban lateral". Right now being "rural lateral" just doesn't hit it.
Kovoschiz (2025-10-23 08:20:47+00:00): Why is this promoted to `=primary` directly?
vectorial8192 (2025-10-23 15:03:14+00:00): - symmetry (Kam Tin Bypass)
- has precedent; see Tseng Tau (Sierra Sea) Sai Sha Road
- strong significance of (recently-moved) park-and-ride access (at least until Northern Link is complete)
- several confirmed neighbourhood development

I must clarify I later rethought about the "park and ride" point raised by @kingkinghk and thought it to be reasonable, at least until Northern Link is complete. But attitude of MTR makes this fishy.
Kovoschiz (2025-10-23 17:36:49+00:00): 1. As I must have explained before, Kam Tin Bypass is for connecting Kam Tin Rd eastward, and bypassing Kam Tin center. There's no "symmetry" here 
2. Again, it's promoted for Sai Sha Rd connecting with Sai Kung already being `=secondary` 
3. Doesn't explain the `=primary`
vectorial8192 (2025-10-25 07:49:09+00:00): You are right. I was under the wrong impression that the west side `=primary` was a different road from Kam Tin Road.

Then, indeed, there is no symmetry, and this `=primary` should still be `=secondary` instead.
kingkingHK (2026-05-23 07:05:03+00:00): FYI I demoted Kam Ho Road south of Pat Heung Road back to `=unclassified`.
kingkingHK (2026-05-23 07:05:14+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183053390
mavl (2025-11-15 10:55:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 174681717 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
janolezab (2026-04-27 22:23:13+00:00): Hi, is there a particular reason you chose type=site for Siedlung Hahneberg? I think it would be better represented by type=boundary or maybe multipolygon (or just an area as there are no enclaves/exclaves)