piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
gscholz (2024-09-25 07:05:33+00:00): Hi فاقد نام,
your recent edits have created a lot of errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=56.28488&lat=31.41313&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas

As you may know, this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps.

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Skô (2026-02-15 16:49:23+00:00): Bonjour, êtes-vous sûr que l'allée Pierre de Serre De Saint-Roman est bien placée ? En vérifiant sur place il n'y a actuellement pas de rue entre le chantier du métro et le bâtiment de l'Opéra. Une rue a depuis été ajoutée après le chantier du métro, il semblerait que celle là soit la bonne Allée Pierre de Serre De Saint-Roman.
Peter Bremer (2024-08-18 10:32:35+00:00): Whoops thanks! The danger of autocomplete while mapping...
aTarom (2024-08-17 08:09:04+00:00): Hola, gracias por editar, me puedes confirmar que no se trata de un error el desplazamiento de
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4839779469/history
?
ahora no coincide ni el "name:ca" con "name", ni la elevación, en la anterior posición sí, está mal en el ICGC? si se trata de nombre local disponemos de "loc_name" y de "place"="locality"
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Local_names_(loc_name)
si la ubicación también es incorrecta podemos notificarlo al ICGC mediante una incidencia. Me dices.
Saludos
random 146 (2024-08-18 07:56:23+00:00): hola.
havia dos etiqutas reduntantes una de punto geodesico que ya he corregido y otra de nombre. el punto geodesico es un punt precisos y creo que no mucha discusion al respecto. Pero los vecinos del barri de mas gimbau nos referimos a la zona comprendida entre el turo de can castellvi hasta el coll de mas pinscomo els turons de can pasqual. hay por lo menos tres maneras de escribir can pasqual, pascoal, pascual, ( ademas del neologismo Kan Paskual que usa la comunidad okupa que habita la zona)
tyfi (2024-08-16 23:59:01+00:00): There was also an instance where the name tag on an SSR used a semicolon delimiter...so I removed that.
tyfi (2024-08-17 00:00:14+00:00): Also, I made a typo in the comment: SSRs should just be SRs. This covers more than just supplemental routes.
tyfi (2024-08-17 00:02:52+00:00): Although, in hindsight, it looks like only SSRs were impacted. So the typo is correct!
_RM-mapper (2024-09-16 10:27:32+00:00): This is not correct
tyfi (2024-08-17 00:22:57+00:00): To be clear, this road is named, but it's not a simple string name that can be canonicalized in the name tag. This is a state road designated as part of State Route 248...or Route 248, State Highway 248, Highway 248, Missouri 248, etc. That's the issue: there is not a canonical text rendering of this designation. So we use route relations to convey this and also ref tags for data consumers that don't process the route relations.
tyfi (2024-08-17 00:27:01+00:00): Also Hwy is an abbreviation, and we try to avoid those on OSM unless the "true" name contains the abbreviation...that's always a case-by-case debate, but in this case it should have been "Highway" if anything
tyfi (2024-08-17 00:39:57+00:00): We try to avoid abbreviation in OSM unless the "true" name contains the abbreviation...that's always a case-by-case debate, but in this case it should have been "Highway" if anything.

And to be clear, this road is named, but it's not a simple string name that can be canonicalized in the name tag. This is a state road designated as part of State Route 7...or Route 7, State Highway 7, Highway 7, Missouri 7, etc. That's the issue: there is not a canonical text rendering of this designation. So we use route relations to convey this and also ref tags for data consumers that don't process the route relations.

I did not add noname=yes back to the ways
tyfi (2024-08-17 00:43:11+00:00): I copied and pasted the text in my previous comment from my comments on changeset #155351001, so that's why it reads awkwardly.
ezio_m (2024-08-17 00:39:29+00:00): aggiunta localizzazione comunità ebraica e targa ad essa dedicata
Layft Greater (2025-04-11 08:08:15+00:00): Good edit. But please also update "addr:street" on associated ways and nodes nearby

Few missed, e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/142915630
PeachyOne (2025-04-17 17:17:28+00:00): Great point. It's quite easy to spot these with the search function in JOSM, so I will try my best not to miss them in future edits.
aTarom (2024-08-17 08:19:41+00:00): Hi, thanks for editing, what does "way"="yes" mean?
at
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2985985724/history
Cheers
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2024-08-19 20:09:22+00:00): Should be water_point, I have fixed it.
emersonveenstra (2024-08-18 12:11:12+00:00): Hi there,

Looks like you accidentally left two names on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/556028808/ and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/400668870 when you merged them, could you go back and remove one of the names from each? Thanks!
Hypsometric (2024-08-18 12:57:17+00:00): Thanks for catching that and letting me know. They are both updated.
klfb75gxiy21tjrh (2024-08-17 18:06:20+00:00): No añadí el paso de peatones porque directamente seleccioné la nota que había usado antes sin darme cuenta, así que me equivoqué
phoenixsaigon1698 (2024-08-18 05:01:25+00:00): Đừng lên OSM phá hoại!
jhaluska80 (2024-08-17 19:56:30+00:00): Since you asked for a review, I looked over it.

Overall not bad.  Remember to hit Q on buildings to square them up (I did it for you).  Also the convention is to add +1 in front of phone numbers.  Neither are big issues.

I don't know if CCM Public Safety qualifies as police or just a school building.  Would a civilian be ok going there in the case of emergency?

Thanks for updating OSM.  Feel free to hit me up with questions as I'm currently the most active mapper in the area.
KDConod (2024-08-17 20:42:08+00:00): Thanks! It's not really police station but CCM Public Safety works very closely with the local & county police (emergency systems here on campus are linked)...so technically if a member of the public went there for help, the officers could assist and put them in touch with local, county or state police.
jhaluska80 (2024-08-17 21:35:03+00:00): I bumped it down to a school building.  

My reasoning is if somebody was using OSM in the event of an emergency, we probably wouldn't want to route them to the CCM building (although there's worst places to route them).

When you start trying to categorize everything on the planet you'll find all sorts of grey areas.  The tags are set up from generic to specific, so when we have doubts we tend to make it more generic.
underscore_en (2024-08-17 03:45:39+00:00): I see that you're using JOSM!
Make sure that you're leveraging the buildings tool plugin to expediate the mapping process!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/155352890
K_Thijm (2024-08-17 05:09:08+00:00): Will do, thank you for the tips!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/155352890
rhtb0 (2024-08-17 17:50:37+00:00): A place that provides facilities for events such as banquets, weddings etc. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=events%20venue?uselang=ko
eggie (2024-08-17 06:39:10+00:00): Dag Mervyn  Hoe kom je hier ooit weer uit?
Maak altijd een verbindingsnode met kruisende wegen.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-08-17 06:54:29+00:00): Node verbinding gemaakt met het Goliuspad. note toegevoegd dat PDOK niet meer klopt.
Bron Obliek Slagboom&Peeters 
MVG
eggie
mervynNLD (2024-08-17 07:21:52+00:00): Hi, weg is aangelegd om toegang te verlenen het parkeerterrein van Miraihouse. Beveiling van het pand kan slagbomen op afstand bedienen.
eggie (2024-08-17 07:27:06+00:00): Klopt... vandaar dat ik een note heb toegevoegd anders gaat iemand het wellicht weer aanpassen naar de oude situatie. 
MVG
eggie
Bierphysik (2025-05-20 09:26:44+00:00): Moin. Ist das dort rechtlich so ausgewiesen, dass Fußgänger auf den Wegen verboten sind?
tyfi (2024-08-17 06:15:39+00:00): This is a large bounding box, but the edits are very sparse. Everything was done manually.
ivanbranco (2025-03-14 12:10:24+00:00): Hi Map4see,

what's the meaning of public=platform?
gscholz (2024-09-25 07:06:02+00:00): Hi فاقد نام,
your recent edits have created a lot of errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=56.28488&lat=31.41313&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas

As you may know, this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps.

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2024-09-25 07:06:32+00:00): Hi فاقد نام,
your recent edits have created a lot of errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=56.28488&lat=31.41313&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas

As you may know, this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps.

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
silversurfer83 (2024-08-18 08:08:49+00:00): Hi,

zwei Anmerkungen:

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history

- Bitte deinen Änderungskommentar auch an das anpassen, was du tust. Hier hast du praktisch nichts am landuse gemacht
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/155355072
Temat-Droga (2024-08-17 07:59:51+00:00): Klenica-Kargowa było jak najbardziej przedyskutowane i zaplanowano tam tertiary.
szydzio (2024-08-17 12:24:58+00:00): Sama dyskusja NIE oznacza bynajmniej zgody społeczności na przetagowanie drogi, musi co do tego być powszechny konsensus i merytoryczne uzasadnienie. Odcinkowa degradacja jest tak samo błędna jak degradacja całej drogi. Przywracam zatem tam secondary. Ewentualne kolejne zmiany będę każdorazowo revertował bez dalszych komentarzy. Pozdrawiam
tyfi (2024-08-17 06:57:07+00:00): FYI this is not a state business route. It's a local route named North/South Business Route 5. It probably still deserves a route relation for semantics, but it's not in the US:MO:Business network.
dypa (2024-08-17 07:39:15+00:00): reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155356612

because "Тосненский водопад" at node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1913844604

in "Саблино" 2 waterfalls with different names
vojtechzaboril (2024-08-17 09:51:09+00:00): Hi, sorry for the mistake. I've got wrong information.
tyfi (2024-08-17 06:59:45+00:00): modifier does not go on road ways. That tag is meant for use in route relations.
tyfi (2024-08-17 07:00:26+00:00): ^ Looks like a relation already exists for it: #7785857
tyfi (2024-08-17 07:08:44+00:00): I don't know the history of route alignments in this area, but MoDOT data does, indeed, support John Shea Drive being MO 13 Spur despite the fact that it does not currently connect to MO 13. (Its travelways are designated SP 13 N and SP 13 S.)
tyfi (2024-08-17 07:09:51+00:00): Docs for the historic site call it RA 13 which is nomenclature I've not seen before...
gscholz (2024-09-25 07:05:48+00:00): Hi فاقد نام,
your recent edits have created a lot of errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=56.28488&lat=31.41313&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas

As you may know, this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps.

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
eggie (2024-08-17 07:31:56+00:00): Dag Bart,

Goed om zaken actueel te maken. Let wel op dat je geen landuse plakt aan de wegen. Dan verschuift alles mee als je iets aanpast.
De landuse ligt weer los.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-08-17 09:57:55+00:00): Na jaren weer een bijdrage, maar voor HOT maps begonnen,,,  daarom alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
sen_takeya (2024-08-19 06:40:12+00:00): どうもこんにちはOSMへようこそ
Esriだけではなく国土地理院全国最新地図(シームレス)も使ってください
よろしくお願いいたします。
55mil (2024-09-21 05:41:40+00:00): 相対的にデータが古いツールを使用しなければならない理由は何でしょうか?
sen_takeya (2024-09-24 00:34:59+00:00): 航空画像が国土地理院が古くEsriが新しいかもしれませんが、それでも位置の精度が高くなるように国土地理院地図を使った後でEsriなり他の画像を使って欲しいのです。osmは位置精度も必要になってきます。精度の高さは国土地理院が最も高いとidのヘルプ背景地図の項に書かれていますし、愛子周辺の国土地理院シームレスの航空画像が見えにくいものとは私は思いません。いずれPLATEAUのインポートによってすべて置き換わるかもしれませんがそれまでは手作業で置く作業が必要になると考えられます。
55mil (2024-09-24 04:01:25+00:00): コメントの趣旨を理解いたしました。
国土地理院シームレスはやや使いづらさがあるので避けていましたが、使用/併用を心がけます。
コメントありがとうございました。
NorthCrab_upload (2024-08-17 08:00:20+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12116483294

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-08-23 08:50:48+00:00): Było to rzeczywiście dyskutowane? Jak tak to daj linka w opisie zmian lub w komentarzach.

Jak nie to każdy może wycofać.
yelisey90 (2024-12-06 14:54:47+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4389288
Lile or Lite? ლილე or ლითე?
evgenykatyshev (2024-12-07 17:57:26+00:00): I don't remember
gscholz (2024-09-25 07:06:17+00:00): Hi فاقد نام,
your recent edits have created a lot of errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=56.28488&lat=31.41313&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas

As you may know, this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps.

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2024-09-29 08:15:14+00:00): Hi فاقد نام, 
these errors still exist. Can I get your feedback here?
Guido
sohrabkardi (2024-08-17 08:31:57+00:00): یکی از بهترین آموزشگاه های فنی و حرفه ای در تهران
eggie (2024-08-17 08:39:41+00:00): parking aangepast
NeisBot (2024-08-17 08:39:20+00:00): Ooops, it seems that some of your names are a bit unusual ...

Amount=1
#NeisLab #Minutely #Naming
pitscheplatsch (2024-08-21 09:59:28+00:00): Hi itfarrier,

May we know the reason behind changing the name of this zoo from "Кролікі" to "Трусы"?

Thanks.
itfarrier (2024-09-13 17:24:39+00:00): Hey, that's 'cause "кролик" (rabbit) and "заяц" (hare) are "трус" in Belarusian.
eggie (2024-08-17 09:40:12+00:00): Beste Bart Dit is niet correct. Kort door de bocht Gebruik highway=footway bij een G7 bord en/of duidelijk alleen voor wandelaars. Dat is hier niet het geval. Vaak zijn doorsteekjes ook bedoeld voor fietsers.
Geen bord dan  highway=path
(een fietspad is het inderdaad niet) 
met bicycle=yes en foot=yes voor de duidelijkheid.
en surface=paving_stones om het te laten routeren als verhard.
De slingerhekjes zij bedoeld als snelheidsremmer.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-08-17 09:46:29+00:00): Doorsteek aangepast naar highway=path
bicycle=no verwijderd.
Laat even weten als er hier een bord is gekomen met fietsers verboden en/of een G7 bord.
MVG
eggie
Geo-Tobi (2024-10-05 06:49:22+00:00): HW=footway mit bicycle=designated, das ist eine ungültige Kombination. Entweder Vz240 oder aber Vz239 mit Rad frei, aber nicht beides kombinieren.

Bitte um Prüfung und Korrektur.
eggie (2024-08-17 15:10:21+00:00): Hoi..
Stimmt genau mit dem BGT.
Grüss
eggie
mcliquid (2024-08-17 16:35:36+00:00): Thanks! See this SCEE issue for more: https://github.com/Helium314/SCEE/issues/602
eggie (2024-08-17 15:08:41+00:00): Dit is oke..  , maar outeren doet het voor niemand want de access staat op access=customers. .. en dat geldt voor alle categorieën. 
Dus ook wandelaars en fietsers.
joschtl (2024-08-19 15:53:44+00:00): Sorry, I'll try to answer in English (and it is quite possible I didn't get your comment correctly…).
This used to be the street to enter the park, but it is closed now by a rock and a sign at the southern end. It is still usable by bikes or pedestrians, but not by cars.
Actually, there seems to be no sign at all that restricts access to the park to customers — nowhere, also not on the new street.
eggie (2024-08-19 15:59:11+00:00): Hi..
Perhaps access=permissive is a better tag in this matter.
The barrier=block will stop cars anyway.
Thanks for reply.
eggie
eggie (2024-08-17 15:07:02+00:00): Dag josch  Wanneer er een bord staat met max 10 dan klopt het.
gr eggie
silversurfer83 (2024-08-18 08:41:25+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap :)

danke, dass du hilfst die Datenbank aktuell zu halten.

Dein Beitrag sieht schon ziemlich gut aus, besonders, dass du direkt an Bürgersteige, Beleuchtung und Poller denkst ist hervorragend.

Einen Tip möchte ich dir noch geben, bevor meine Begrüßung hier endet:
Wenn du Gebäude gezeichnet und ihnen anschließend Eigenschaften (tags) wie Adresse, Gebäudetyp, etc, gegeben hast, drück doch bitte die Taste "Q" wenn es sich um ein rechtwinkliges Gebäude handelt. Diese Taste macht alle Winkel schön rechtwinklig.

Probier es doch mal an deinen neuen Häusern hier aus

happy mapping

silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/155360137
DonSmon (2024-08-18 09:45:46+00:00): Hallo und vielen Dank für den Willkommensgruß.

Auch vielen Dank für die Rückmeldung, habe es direkt so angepasst (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155404848) - es gibt sicher noch einige Hilfsmittel kennen zu lernen :-)

Grüße, DonSmon
eggie (2024-08-17 15:05:54+00:00): Dag josch  Lijkt me voorlopig oke.
Gr eggie
eggie (2024-08-17 15:04:39+00:00): Dag joschtl Wanneer aangegeven staat dat het alleen voor gebruikers van het Marinapark is dan is het correct.
Denk niet dat motor_vehicle=no er dan bijhoort.
Welk bord staat vooraan? Een C12 bord? 
Of staat er doodlopende weg inv met die barrier=block? 
MVG
eggie
joschtl (2024-08-19 15:59:16+00:00): Sorry for answering in English.
The old street is inaccessible for cars, as it is blocked by a rock and sign. All traffic entering (or exiting) the park must use Capellegoedweg and the new, wavy, West to East dirt street. There are signs that limit the speed to 10 km/h both on the new dirt street and on Pipeluurseweg in the park.
eggie (2024-08-19 16:03:36+00:00): Okay.. clear to me and up to you 😀
sohrabkardi (2024-08-17 09:37:57+00:00): خیابان آزادی - بعد از خ دکتر قریب - پلاک ۱۹۵
trigpoint (2024-08-22 17:57:11+00:00): Hi, don't you think it is odd to find an unmapped pub in a well mapped first world country? Especially one that clearly looks like a 1960s semi on aerial imagery?
Cheers Phil
I would certainly have checked the existing mapping and on doing so would have found  https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/879624400/history had been mapped 14 years ago.
Please be careful
bxl-forever (2024-08-17 11:11:07+00:00): Hello,

I had to redo this edit.
You merely renumbered two UrbIS address points and gave both of them the same house number 221.  Not only this creates an unwanted duplicate address but also 221 is unknown in UrbIS, so we cannot let a node having this address and a reference number.
We’d better make number 221 a separate node.  I retagged the former nodes as non-existing addresses instead, to avoid generating errors when validating against UrbIS.
Have a nice day.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-10 01:27:24+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164747382
infeeeee (2024-08-18 10:56:49+00:00): Szia!
Itt valamit összekevertél, outdoor_seating címkének nincs értelme kukákon.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:outdoor_seating

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155408525
zsola400 (2024-08-18 12:40:24+00:00): Szia!
Ezek FKF szelektív konténerek üveg, papír, műanyag.
Térképen kuka van ezt nem tudtam módosítani, ezért javítottam így.
Ezt hogyan tudnám helyesen szerkeszteni/javítani ebben tudnál segíteni?
infeeeee (2024-08-18 17:10:50+00:00): Organic Maps az elsősorban megjelenítő, abban csak a leges-legegyszerűbb szerkesztéseket lehet megcsinálni, ezért ott nem lehet ezt. Látom hagytál jegyzetet is, az bőven elég lett volna. Jegyzetek szem előtt vannak, többen folyamatosan követjük őket, majd ha valaki pont errefele szerkeszt valamit, megoldja (pl én, mindjárt)

Ha rendesen szerkeszteni akarod a térképet, akkor arra mobilon a StreetComplete egy jó app, kezdőknek való. Abban sem lehet mindent, de majdnem mindent, ajánlom próbáld ki: https://streetcomplete.app
Ebben is van mód jegyzetet hagyni, ha valamit nem tudsz megcsinálni, használd.

Ha a rendes szerkesztés érdekel, ahhoz itt találsz részletesebb leírásokat, de azt mobilról nem lehet annyira hatékonyan:

https://learnosm.org/hu/

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hu:Beginners'_guide
zsola400 (2024-08-18 18:45:25+00:00): Köszönöm a segítséget, kipróbáltam, a StreetComplete szerintem egyelőre elég lesz nekem, már ez is sokat tud!
Ha jól értem/próbáltam a StreetComplete programban csak megjegyzésbe tudom beírni, hogy ha pl. megszünt egy bolt? És ezt majd valaki véglegesíti.
infeeeee (2024-08-18 19:21:27+00:00): Ha megszűnt egy bolt, azt tudod StreetComplete-tel is jelölni:

Ha ad kérdést vele kapcsolatban, válaszoknál:
Uh... -> Nem létezik -> Üresen áll

Ha nem ad kérdést:
Felül jobbról a 2. gomb (kiemelések) -> Helyek -> Kiválasztod a boltot -> Bal alul ... -> Üresen áll.

Ha beállítod, hogy ne töltse fel automatikusan, akkor nyugodtan próbálgathatod a gombokat, vissza tudod vonni. Csak ne felejtsd majd el feltölteni, ha kész vagy:)

Még a bal alul levő + gombot próbáld ki, azzal tudsz új elemet hozzáadni, itt is számít, hogy melyik kiemelés van kiválasztva, olyasmiket tudsz létrehozni.

Ha jegyzetet csinálsz, jó ha adsz hozzá fotót, egy kép többet mond ezer szónál.

Ha kérdésed merülne fel, a magyar szerkesztő közösség elérhetőségeit megtalálod ezen az oldalon: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hungary/Közösség

További jó térképezést!
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-26 13:50:59+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9397388229/history has width = 0 that was added in this edit
how something exist and have width=0?
milet (2025-11-26 15:24:29+00:00): "how something exist and have width=0?" - Quantum Physics... ;-)
Should probably be something around 1m. I will check and correct the width. Thanks for pointing that out to me!
milet (2025-11-26 15:29:22+00:00): Actually, width doesn't make sense at all. Removed it.
maxwidth:physical=1 was already set.
SomeoneElse (2024-08-17 11:40:10+00:00): The massive bounding box is perhaps due to relation edits.  The actual edits are at https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=155362732
eggie (2024-08-17 14:47:22+00:00): Oke..., maar eigenlijk zijn alle values in UK English.  Wellicht geeft de wiki opheldering. Even geen idee nu welke code dat is. 
Maar ik denk dat iedereen incl buitenlanders met een laadapparaat wel weet dat die contactdozen hetzelfde zijn als in een Nederlands huishouden.
In Duitsland wordt trouwens gewoon bij laadpalen voor auto's geladen met een adaptor.
eggie (2024-08-17 14:59:37+00:00): Is oke zo.
Anas masuris (2025-05-03 21:05:51+00:00): Hej, do oznaczania numeru toru służy tag 'railway:track_ref' np. 'railway:track_ref=51'. Bardzo proszę o poprawienie edycji (zamiana name=* na railway:track_ref=*)
Robert Whittaker (2024-10-11 09:24:06+00:00): Could you check the designation tags you gave to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1308417774 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1308417778 in this changeset? I suspect they should both be just designation=public_footpath, but currently one has designation=public_footway and the other has designation=public_footway;quiet_lane . Many thanks!
Pink Duck (2024-10-11 09:28:20+00:00): It is actually one of the relatively few quiet lanes that happens to be cross-field. I only added the designation in from the point fairly inset where the quite lanes marker appeared on the SE end.
Pink Duck (2024-10-11 09:30:44+00:00): +quiet - it continues along Robinson’s Loke bridleway too.
Pink Duck (2024-10-11 09:36:53+00:00): Can spot the marker in Aug 2016 StreetView, but like a lot of them they have become rather overgrown or accident impacted since.