piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
flohoff (2023-06-18 14:33:11+00:00): Es geht nicht nur darum das die region so groß wird sondern das dieses systematische und meschanische abarbeiten vorher im Community Forum abgestimmt werden soll.

Dazu ist Osmose oder ähnliches kein guter Ratgeber ob dinge richtig oder falsch sind. Das ist nur ein Hinweis da mal hinzusehen.

Und alte/obsolete Tags zu entfernen ist eigentlich kein guter Stil da jede änderung ja wieder history records erzeugt. Lieber wenn man die objekte eh wegen irgendwas editiert dann das zeugs entfernen.

Deshalb warnt Josm seit geraumer zeit z.b. die is_in an - Und so sind wir auch die "editor" tags los geworden. Nicht durch massenhaftes editieren ALLER objekte - sondern nach und nach.

Flo
MichaelFS (2023-06-18 15:59:19+00:00): OK, verstanden! Wie gesagt: Ich lerne ...
ivanbranco (2023-06-26 09:39:38+00:00): Hi portuStreet,

isn't this a duplicate of this https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10706693417/history?
InsertUser (2023-06-04 08:50:21+00:00): Have these buildings really been demolished?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136907770
audtr (2023-06-03 18:52:05+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136803524

Bleibt noch die Redundanz mit
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/749535609
eggie (2023-06-03 16:17:52+00:00): Ahh  mooi... Ik was net toevallig hetzelfde aan het doen. Dus het kan dat we elkaar in de weg zaten.
Zou het nog even checken.  Als je goed kijkt zie je ook dat de paden bij access no vervagen. Ze doen er niet meer toen.

Ik kijk straks wel weer even
Succes
eggie
Vliegensvlug (2023-06-03 16:24:03+00:00): Ik zie het inderdaad. Ik ben klaar met bewerken voor vandaag.
eggie (2023-06-03 16:36:15+00:00): Oke zal het nog even nalopen.
Up to you als local mapper.
access=no is dus bijna altijd fout..
maar dat is access=yes ook.
Dat geeft ook in combinaties probelen.
Als ik conflicterende tagging tegenkom pas ik het toch even nog aan.
Zioe nog access no staan op het zuidelijke deel en access=yes op de fietsstraat. Je moet na moreg maar even kijken. Te mooi weer voor osm. 
Groet
eggie
eggie (2023-06-03 17:01:34+00:00): Toch nog even wat access no en yes verwijderd.. ook bicycle=yes..
Waar het motor_vehicle=destination is heb ik mofa en moped = yes toegevoegd.. want osm beschouwt die als motorvoertuigen. 
Het luitert echt heel nauw.
eggie (2023-06-03 17:03:04+00:00): Op die busroutes is het natuurlijk wel access=no met bicycle=yes  Dat zijn de bekende uitzonderingen.
InsertUser (2023-06-04 13:34:33+00:00): There appears to be a conflict between the "name" of "Private Road- Beach Access" and then given it properties indicating that the general public have a legal right of access to this track by foot, bike, horse and vehicle. 

Is there actually a legal right to access here or is it "permissive" to people who want to use it?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136908368
onLe (2023-06-07 12:56:31+00:00): The subdivided properties do belong to the owners on the street, but not in a capacity to claim the street as their own. i.e. the street does not belong to the government, is part of the "village". Hence the “Beach Access" This is a popular beach for tourists and surfers and we the owners will not block the road for that reason.
Thanks for your concern and lmk if I need to change anything.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136908368
Carto'Cité (2023-09-07 13:04:42+00:00): Salut Ephtolens,
J'ai questionné un contributeur qui a passé l'aménagement de path à cycleway pour savoir s'il y a une signalétique qui le justifie et je me permets de demander de ton côté aussi pour savoir car je pense que tu dois faire un peu de terrain et que tu connais bien les pratiques.
C'est dans ce changeset : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138854116
À ta disposition pour en discuter.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #VeloNormandie
Roue-doudou (2023-09-07 13:19:46+00:00): Hello ! Yes j'avais pas vu ce commentaire, j'ai repondu directement sur le changeset du gars ! ;)
Carto'Cité (2023-09-08 08:42:27+00:00): Merci beaucoup, c'est parfait comme ça ! 😀
Charles
watmildon (2023-06-03 20:30:36+00:00): Hello!

The name=rumah tag should not be added. The name tag is not for description.

You can also make things look a lot more crisp by squaring corners before upload. Select a building and press the 'q' key.

Matt
chris66 (2024-01-09 15:15:05+00:00): Auf dem Luftbild ist hier kein Gebäude zu sehen.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/980119702
danvyr (2023-06-03 17:27:57+00:00): why you reverting my edits without a comment? 
it's not polite
you are not only one here
AjBelnuovo (2025-01-20 17:08:44+00:00): Que tipo de indústria é?
jaysonwcs (2025-01-20 17:16:53+00:00): A qual area você se refere?
groberschnitzer (2023-06-18 09:46:49+00:00): Hallo eriosw,
kurze Frage zu diesem CS. Warum hast du allen nodes des Naturschutzgebiets den tag ele=0.0 hinzugefügt? ele gibt doch die Höhe über Meeresniveau an  - oder wird das bei Naturschutzgebieten auch anders verwendet?
LG
eriosw (2023-06-18 14:02:52+00:00): Das habe ich leider übersehen. Ich habe derzeit keine Möglichkeit dies zu Ändern. Es wird noch etwas dauern.
Frans S (2023-06-12 12:21:40+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points: (The paragraphs refers to attached document)
A: Not accurately drawn
D: Connecting nodes of buildings to other buildings or features like roads and residential areas.
E. Buildings not squared.




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136909212
nevw (2023-06-03 20:33:12+00:00): This gift shop also seems to not exist at this location.
nevw (2023-06-04 08:19:56+00:00): Hi
I have reverted both of your edits of items that don’t exist at mapped locations
wolfgang8741 (2023-06-06 16:11:20+00:00): This changeset seems to create a lot of untagged nodes duplicating nodes for the ways existing nodes, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/929206069 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1061511800 respectively. Was there a reason for this or was this unintentional?
N8033F (2023-06-06 16:47:24+00:00): Completely unintentional. Any changes that I make are generally kept locally. If they were submitted to the server then it was by shear accident on closing JOSM. Regards,
HubMiner (2023-11-29 06:46:13+00:00): Hello again, a similar comment, please check if you could remove these orphan nodes: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10949175200#map=16/39.9122/-81.1690&layers=D

https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/issue/41156740-3591-21f2-5fb8-08ee28715c6c
HubMiner (2023-11-29 06:47:05+00:00): Also here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10949157847#map=18/39.04373/-81.99405&layers=D
HubMiner (2023-11-29 06:48:26+00:00): Also here, along the water: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10949168495#map=16/39.3913/-81.3850&layers=D
Rogoyski (2023-07-29 11:45:21+00:00): Co dokładnie kryje się pod nazwą BDOT 500 Warszawa?
NorthCrab_upload (2023-06-03 17:30:16+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/936519392
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/936519397
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/936519414

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
syntex (2025-07-27 11:55:04+00:00): Czy ja wiem, może lepsze to niż multipolygon?
HikeAndMap (2023-06-03 22:17:37+00:00): Hi there, thank you for the amazing work you're doing. Please keep it up!

one request though - would you be so kind before moving to other areas/countries/provinces to upload your changes, even if it's just 1, to ensure all mappers, yourself included, can better keep track on what we're all doing on this global database?

Thank you
Glassman (2023-06-04 20:57:38+00:00): Can you review this edit. The address says 11th Avenue but this building is a block away from 11th Avenue. Also the website for ashtown brewing says they are open at a new location. See https://ashtownbrewing.com/
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136910606
Fijigus (2023-06-06 16:38:49+00:00): It should be 1145 11th ave. Not sure how to repin the building on the map. They moved about a year or two ago. Closed hudson early 2020 reopened on 11th a few blocks away in 2021/2022.
kuhni74 (2023-08-31 08:12:24+00:00): Vielen Dank für die Ergänzungen auf der Schneealpe! Von welchen alten Karten stammen die Namen denn her? Insbesondere die "Große Mitterbergwand" würd mich sehr interessieren. Die Angabe "Map Collection, Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Science" ist nicht ganz klar für mich. Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2576172
kuhni74 (2023-08-31 09:01:51+00:00): Ungefähr wo jetzt die "Große Mitterbergwand" gemappt ist, ist z.B. in der Franzisco-Josephinischen Landesaufnahme übrigens der "Mitterberg W." (in anderer Schrift als Bergformationen) eingezeichnet, das ist laut Franziszeischem Kataster der "Mitterbergwald" - wurde das vielleicht verwechselt?
horst_w (2023-08-31 17:24:01+00:00): Aufgrund Deiner Frage wollte ich die Quelle nachvollziehen. Muss aber gestehen, dass ich diese Quelle selbst nicht mehr gefunden habe. Ich habe aber im Hinterkopf, dass ich sowohl "Mitterbergwald" als auch "Gr(oße) Mitterbergwand" nebeneinander gesehen habe. Sonst hätte ich es nicht gemappt.
Ich werde nochmals versuchen die Quelle wieder zu finden. Wenn nicht, werde ich die Ortsbezeichnug wieder rausnehmen.
Danke für die Nachfrage/Kontrolle.
charles chilufya (2023-06-03 18:50:47+00:00): I have tried to view that path, using different imagery, unfortunately, I haven't seen something showing like a path on the ground. It has also passed through the top of the building. History shows that it was created in 2010 August and updated in 2015. Someone near this place to advise.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136911761
Scout Jens (2023-06-04 16:00:13+00:00): There was a path. You can see this from the chemin de saint-loup. I was there. Between the buildings the path is not usable at the moment, because there are growing trees.
What do vou want to change?
charles chilufya (2023-06-03 18:35:25+00:00): nice edits and changes, thankyou
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136911777
kogutowicz-mano (2024-02-09 05:41:32+00:00): alt_name? :-o
Össze akarják kötni Kelenföldet a Laczkovich-csal? Honnan származik az információ?
f_laszlo (2024-02-11 13:44:54+00:00): Az e-kozmu oldalon látszik, hogy a két tárgyi alállomás össze van kötve, méghozzá 11 kV-on. Ez a kapcsolat már akkor is megvolt, amikor még nem létesítették a 132 kV-os, Laczkovich utcai alállomás. Sőt, már a második világháború előtt megépítették azt a közműalagutat, amelyikben a kábel halad.
Dodko (2023-10-30 17:35:59+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/172377683/history
Pre dom smútku sa nepoužíva
shop=funeral_directors
ale
amenity=funeral_hall
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dfuneral_hall
Matthew Hostak (2023-10-30 17:40:48+00:00): Hej, teraz pozeram co tam pod tagom Funeral Hall IDeditor vlastne dava a je to blbost, dik za upozornenie, budem to musiet poopravovat aj inde
Marc_ch (2025-03-16 19:55:08+00:00): Bonjour,
pour info Mennekes n'est pas une marque de borne, c'est le nom d'un type de fiche (type2 ou type2_cable selon qu'il y a ou pas un cable attaché à la borne)
Salutations,
Marc
Cebderby (2023-06-04 08:41:57+00:00): Looking at the website for this site, it is not possible to rent single beds (or even single rooms) but is rented all-or-nothing.  It is therefore not a 'hostel' but rather a large OSM 'chalet' as was previously correctly set.
See 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism=hostel?uselang=en-GB
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism=chalet?uselang=en-GB
and 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism=guest_house?uselang=en-GB
Also you set a guest_house tag which is a sub-tag of tourism=guest_house, which this is not (and you did not select either).  Reverted.
Cebderby (2023-06-04 08:22:35+00:00): dragged node of foot bridge reset to original position, your changes visible in: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=136912450
Cebderby (2023-06-04 08:15:01+00:00): The expected public_transport tag for highway=bus_stop node is public_transport=platform.  Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:public%20transport=platform?uselang=en-GB
and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:public%20transport=stop%20area?uselang=en-GB
the latter of which is for use on a stop area relation.  There is no public_transport=stop.  Repeatedly guessing at tags (eg to try to make iD warnings go away) is not going to help improve the map.  I've set public_transport=platform.
bxl-forever (2023-06-04 08:49:34+00:00): Hello,

This message is to warn you that you are putting incorrect information in the database.

Please read this message carefully.  I also wrote to you yesterday, this is a second attempt to warn you.

This shape is really weird:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1178619614
It looks like you used the curved image of the gabled roof as if the building was making a dent.  This is unfortunately wrong.

The hedges are poorly located, I fear some other mappers will have to erase all your edits and start again.

As we already advised, please learn how OSM works before submitting work to the database.  Also, if you want to use the online editor to add buildings and separators, please switch to "AIV Flanders GRB" background.  Do NOT trace buildings on aerial imagery.
JassKurn (2023-06-03 23:24:33+00:00): Hi, I believe you've made an error in this changeset. You've dragged on node from a road a few 100 metes from where it should be. You can see it on map fairly clearly.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/50.53989/-3.89995
Cebderby (2023-06-04 08:02:06+00:00): As well as dragging the road/path junction node to a wall, you also dragged a ruin node (some distance away) to a river and a solar panel into a field. See https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=136912924
Reverted changeset and reapplied the good change of road type residential to unclassified.  
Please review how this happened, for example how you move the map while editting.  
Also please always set specific meaningful changeset comments so others know what you intended, eg 'change road type to unclassified' here, so that intended vs unintended changes can be understood if the changeset(s) need to be reviewed.
Helium314 (2024-01-16 06:13:03+00:00): Hi,
du hast hier einige Cafes eingetragen die am Luftbild eher nach Swimming Pools aussehen, siehe Notizen
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4017080
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4017081
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4017083
CurlingMan13 (2023-06-11 06:07:58+00:00): Please use more descriptive changeset comments.  What did you do?  Why?  etc.?  "Yes" tells me nothing.

More details can be found here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments#:~:text=A%20good%20changeset%20comment%20should,have%20edited%20on%20the%20map.
eggie (2023-06-03 20:04:08+00:00): Dag wolb

Je vraagt feedback.
Lijkt me oke..  access=yes heb ik verwijderd. Dat beter nooit taggen. 
Mocht er een paaltje staan dan kun je evt barrier=bollard taggen op een node verbonden met het pad.
MVG
eggie
mapperue (2023-08-30 11:07:04+00:00): Ahoj, nápisy na pamätníkoch, sochách a pod. sa značia ako inscription.
Matthew Hostak (2023-08-30 14:06:36+00:00): Hej, pre wayside_cross a shrine to tam automaticky davam, pre statue mi to idEditor neponuka, tak to davam do description ked tak. Tu mi asi ruka usla a jeden cross to mal v description, fixnute. Dik
mapperue (2023-08-30 14:31:20+00:00): Rozhodujúce sú pravidlá openstreetmap, nie čo ponúka editor iD. Ten je aj tak väčšinou neaktuálny.
Matthew Hostak (2023-08-30 14:36:15+00:00): Hej hej
aceman444 (2024-01-04 22:35:27+00:00): Pan mapperue, mohli by ste sa tym zacat aj sam riadit:)
Filip009 (2024-01-09 19:20:26+00:00): @Matthew Hostak celkom dole v ľavej časti je záložka tagy a tam sa dá pridať inscription, aj keď ho iDeditor neponúka.
Matthew Hostak (2024-01-09 19:38:39+00:00): Hej, potom ma to napadlo, ze vlastne dole sa to da editovat priamo, tak uz to riesim tak. Dik
Keith W Robertson (2023-08-02 05:51:51+00:00): Brand new path added from recently released mapping from Gwynedd Council. Not possible to survey at this time. Hopefully soon !!
SekeRob (2023-06-03 19:35:41+00:00): Sorry, missed to see these 2 dentist category typo corrections were continents apart
Javierpf (2023-06-03 20:33:14+00:00): Hello! Thank you for the updates. In the future, please split your changesets into smaller ones by specific geographic areas such as countries, provinces, etc. Examples:
you are adding/modifying 10 objects in 2 distant cities => make 2 changesets, 1 per city.
you are adding/modifying 5 objects in 5 countries => make 5 changesets, 1 per country.
Some relevant reading material: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
SekeRob (2023-06-04 06:37:03+00:00): Hi,

Did you see my 'sorry' note? If you had you'd have realized you've wasted your time writing your comment.

ciao
Javierpf (2023-06-05 12:55:43+00:00): Hi Sekebob, 
You were right, I didn't read your note. My apologies.
herrybrook12 (2023-11-28 10:53:08+00:00): Hello! Thank you for the updates.
https://sassa-status-check.org.za
xosawi (2023-11-29 16:45:40+00:00): Hey! Thanks a bunch for the updates.
https://capcuttemplates.co/
educonnects (2024-07-18 08:18:02+00:00): Thanks for the update 
https://educonnectnormandie.online/toutatice/
educonnects (2024-09-23 08:40:34+00:00): When managing app installations, it's important to ensure you're downloading from trusted sources, especially when dealing with APK files. If you're looking for a reliable site to download a wide variety of apps and games,  https://goapks.com/  offers a vast selection of APKs. Whether you're fixing issues or simply exploring new apps, having a trusted platform helps you avoid potential errors like 'typo category key' mishaps and ensures a smoother experience.
johnioman (2025-08-09 06:01:11+00:00): the https://happymod.pro/ space where ideas grow, opinions meet, and solutions are born.
Dodko (2024-01-16 15:06:58+00:00): Značka 
shop=funeral_directors
je pre pohrebníctvo, pre dom smútku sa používa
amenity=funeral_hall

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dfuneral_hall
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dfuneral_directors
Matthew Hostak (2024-01-16 15:11:59+00:00): Zdravim,
viem o tom, myslel som, ze som to vsade poopravoval, ale evidentne nie.
Dik za upozornenie
Dodko (2024-01-16 15:18:28+00:00): Vieš si to skontrolovať tu
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1G2Y
Matthew Hostak (2024-01-16 15:24:19+00:00): Aj som take nieco skusal, ale evidentne sa mi to nepodarilo. Dik, opravim to
charles chilufya (2023-06-03 20:44:39+00:00): Hi team, Lostlost is a new Mapper and he has deleted up to 10,000 things that i have failed to check. Can anyone here verify what the New Mapper has deleted? i can not go on and verify this work because of that.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136914933
jmarchon (2023-06-04 05:18:26+00:00): Hello Charles Chilufya,
This changeset is one of many in preparation for the Florida landuse import. More info can be found here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Florida_Landuse_Import
SherbetS (2023-06-07 14:04:25+00:00): Hi Charles, 

lostlost has been helping me with the import, and I've given strict oversight over all work he's conducted.
HikeAndMap (2023-06-03 22:42:54+00:00): Hi there, thanks for your contributions to OpenStreetMap. Please keep up the good edits!

And if desired - join the global mapping community where you can learn a lot more about improving your mapping activities.

Either way - thank you very much and keep it up regardless of joining a community or not.

FYI: you can find many OpenStreetMap channels active on Telegram:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/List_of_OSM_centric_Telegram_accounts
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136915124
bxl-forever (2023-07-21 22:42:45+00:00): Hello,

Thanks for this.  Your latest contributions are quite good.  Though, I would like to raise your attention about the use of the "access" key on ways.  I recently came across strange routing suggestions for vehicles being sent over footways or stairs and it turned out the problem was created by a few changesets of yours.

Here it is.  Routing algorithms have a look at all the ways in the database and must determine whether a given mode of transport may use it.  So, highway=footway|steps means "This is only for pedestrians", and then "access=yes" means "Every mode of transport (car, bicycle, foot) may use it."  The "access" tag always overrides the default values set by the highway type.  Consequently, highway=footway + access=yes allow cars on the footway.  I know it might sound counter-intuitive but that is how routing works.

So, the recommended way is to avoid using access=yes on footways and stairs.  The tag is not needed at all when it is set to yes.  When there is a risk of ambiguity, e.g. public paths across private property, you can use "foot=yes" or "foot=permissive" and that will be all right.

Happy mapping.
elucci (2023-08-06 14:01:00+00:00): Hi bxl-forever,
Thanks for the explanation and for fixing it. I must have been tricked by the fact that the "access" tag appears as default in the iD editor, and I did not think about its implications, such as the overriding of other default parameters. Thanks for pointing that out, and apologies if that created problems.
Have a nice mapping !
felipeeugenio (2023-06-03 21:52:00+00:00): Hola
Hay un puente de la ciclovía que pasa por por Pablo fuentes?
no aparece así en la foto satelital.
saludos
felipeeugenio (2023-06-03 21:52:31+00:00): También agregó segmentos de puente en José Bunster
eggie (2023-06-04 05:04:44+00:00): Dag Jasper... De woningen heb ik ook van construction gehaald.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-06-04 05:26:12+00:00): motor_vehicle=no verwijderd van paaltje. Dat is default.
alexey_zakharenkov (2023-06-05 08:53:32+00:00): Hello!
Could you fix errors in routes you've worked on? The validator shows the errors by city:
https://cdn.organicmaps.app/subway/japan.html
NorthCrab_upload (2023-06-03 21:00:19+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/436643649
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/436641662

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
felipeeugenio (2023-06-03 21:56:27+00:00): Hola Ursula suarez tiene sentido en el segmento entre Isabel Riquelme e Inés de Suárez solamente?

Porque agregó una calle encima de la que había. Supongo que eso quizo expresar.
saludos
wenasTardes (2023-06-06 01:59:40+00:00): Efectivamente, es solo un segmento (específicamente una cuadra) de un solo sentido. Son mis primeras ediciones, disculpa la torpeza.

Saludos
felipeeugenio (2023-06-06 12:50:06+00:00): No hay problemas, estamos para ayudar.
saludos
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-01 21:53:27+00:00): Hello!

You used
cuisine=hot_pot
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7248927990/history

Have you maybe meant
cuisine=hotpot
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
M!dgard (2024-12-23 20:38:45+00:00): Nice! Die kende ik nog niet.