piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2023-08-22 20:43:19+00:00): Waneer je die hekken op access=no zet en het is ook voor hulpdiensten dan zul je emergency=yes moeten toevoegen, want de routering van de hulpdiensten wordt gestopt door access=no.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-08-22 20:46:04+00:00): Weer routeerbaar gemaakt voor hulpdiensten
Gr eggie
rraggl (2023-08-22 21:38:12+00:00): Bedankt!
eggie (2023-08-22 21:42:32+00:00): Hoi,

De doorsteken heb ik ook op access=no met emergency=yes gezet.

Dat werkt in LiveOp!  De routingapp van de brandweer.
Overigens routeerde het niet voor regulier verkeer daar. 
Laat je niet ontmoedigen door kritiek. Veel plezier met mappen,
eggie
rraggl (2023-08-22 21:48:43+00:00): Hmm... Het is mijn woon- / werk route en Magic Earth probeerde telkens van de N59 af de Parallelweg te pakken aan de westelijke kant en aan voor de aansluiting met de snelweg ging hij er weer op de N59. Omgekeerd, als ik de parallelweg pakte omdat er file stond, probeerde hij bij de doorsteken op deze CADOs op de N59 te komen en ging er daarna weer van af. 

Nee, dat is leren en er zullen nog aardig wat contexten zijn, waar ik nog niets van weet, dus zo makkelijk komen jullie nog niet van mij af. ;-) Spijt me alleen van het extra werk voor jou.
eggie (2023-08-22 21:54:25+00:00): Het is geen extra werk...  Ik screen gewoon en af en toe pas ik wat aan. 
Startende mappers worden niets kwalijk genomen. 
Vreemd dat de hekken met access=private (overigens verkeerd gebruikt hier)  in Magic Earth niet herkend worden.
Nu staan de CADO's zelf ook op slot met access=no en emergency=yes.
Groet
eggie
eggie (2023-08-22 21:57:26+00:00): De routers in OSM zelf routeren in ieder geval niet over de doorsteken..
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_car&route=51.70181%2C4.32749%3B51.70195%2C4.32897#map=18/51.70159/4.32769&layers=N
Pas wanneer Magic Earth zijn update heeft gehad zal de routering stoppen. Geen idee hoelang dat duurt.
CjMalone (2023-08-23 09:52:46+00:00): FYI this isn't ideal if there is a flat above and the shop is only on the ground floor.
ianc (2023-08-23 13:07:26+00:00): There isn't.
HellMap (2023-08-23 12:21:26+00:00): Sveiki!

Zīmējot pilnu kontūru parastām ietvēm un celiņiem kā piemēram https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1201188517 , šie "laukumi" nebūs 
`highway=pedestrian` + `area=yes` bet gan `area:highway=footway`. Gadījumos, ja tie ir plati un kustība ir visos virzienos (nevis galvenokārt sakrīt ar pašu ceļu) būs `highway=footway` + `area=yes`. Līdzīgi ir visiem `highway` variantiem. Bet tāda lieta kā `highway=pedestrian` + `area=yes` ir speciāli veidoti laukumi, kur parasti ir visādi soliņi utt. - tādi nekad nebūs tur, kur parastas ietves. Vēl pieminēšu, ka te ne visur ir `footway` - piemēram https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/889204955 posms ir `cycleway` un tāpēc arī kontūra būs `area:highway=cycleway`. Un vēl kontūras principā nevar pastāvēt pašas par sevi bez iezīmēta ceļa pa vidu, kā piemēram https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1201188518/  - šeit jābūt `highway=footway` līnijai maršrutēšanai un savienojumiem.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:area:highway#Differentiation_area:highway_vs._area=yes_on_a_highway
NorthCrab_upload (2023-08-22 21:10:20+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11135042412

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
user_20113808 (2023-08-25 05:21:57+00:00): For your support of the rapists of children, a worse fate awaits you!
user_20113808 (2023-08-25 05:22:13+00:00): you support russian? you support raping children?
user_20113808 (2023-08-25 05:22:29+00:00): are you defending Russian? bitch, they will find you and punish you, you fagot
user_20113808 (2023-08-25 05:22:35+00:00): motherfucker!
user_20113808 (2023-08-25 05:22:36+00:00): Do you love Russians?
user_20113808 (2023-08-25 05:22:54+00:00): motherfucker!
user_20113808 (2023-08-25 05:22:55+00:00): you faggot!
user_20113808 (2023-08-25 05:23:00+00:00): you cocksucker
user_20113808 (2023-08-25 05:23:15+00:00): you support russian? so why reverting deletions of that language? if russian will rape you relatives how then you will act?
user_20113808 (2023-08-25 05:23:19+00:00): you reverted back russian language, you like raped children?! FUCK YOU!
user_20113808 (2023-08-25 05:23:36+00:00): You are raper too!
Metzor (2023-09-11 19:47:48+00:00): Hallo Eifelkobold!

Schöner neuer Kreisverkehr :-)

Kann es sein, dass man im westlichen Teil der  Kommernerstr noch die lanes und turn:lanes anpassen müsste? Z.B:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/921225980#map=18/50.65084/6.73078&layers=N

Brouter beschwert sich, dass man von der Linksabbiegespur nicht weiter fahren kann und leider find ich gerade keine aktuellen Luftbilder um es selbst zu ändern...

Viele Grüße 
Metzor
Eifelkobold! (2023-09-11 20:37:45+00:00): Hi, ja das ist richtig, die hatte ich übersehen und mussten ebenfalls angepasst werden. Mit dem Umbau sind die Abbiegespuren natürlich entfallen. Ich habe diese daher in Änderungssatz 141132521 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141132521) überarbeitet. Jetzt sollte es passen.
 
Die aktuellsten Luftbilder für die Region sind gerade die vorläufigen DOP des Landes NRW. Diese stammen von Anfang Juni und sind über folgenden Link abrufbar: wms:https://www.wms.nrw.de/geobasis/wms_nw_vdop?FORMAT=image/png&TRANSPARENT=TRUE&VERSION=1.3.0&SERVICE=WMS&REQUEST=GetMap&LAYERS=nw_vdop_rgb&STYLES=&CRS={proj}&WIDTH={width}&HEIGHT={height}&BBOX={bbox}

Später werden daraus dann die normalen NRW DOP in hervorragender True DOP Qualität, welche die in den vDOP noch vorhandenen Gebäudeverzerrungen entfernt.

viele Grüße

Eifelkobold
Metzor (2023-09-11 21:36:08+00:00): Cool, danke und danke für die Infos!
user_5359 (2023-08-23 06:02:43+00:00): Welcome to OSM (again). What is the mean of this single node with the key highe
way?
danieldegroot2 (2023-08-23 21:18:52+00:00): this is like, a vending_machine + fee=no, maybe?
danieldegroot2 (2023-08-23 21:53:44+00:00): Ah you have another RFC.
Yes, looks like multiple people have pointed out the recommended tag.
Think "free beer" along the road-kind of vending machine.
(can't find the thread, Amanda might know what I'm thinking of.)
danieldegroot2 (2023-08-23 21:56:35+00:00): probably was not free but the idea is it usually makes sense to map them as such even if it's just a basket.
Cy0nyx_PL (2023-08-29 15:46:01+00:00): Dlaczego granica miasta została zmieniona? Istnieją jakieś dokumenty, które są wstanie podważyć aktualny przebieg przyjęty i najpewniej ustalony przez geodetę?
eggie (2023-08-22 22:00:00+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback  Svp geen oneway=no gaan toevoegen aan reguliere wegen.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Bram van den Broek (2023-08-22 22:50:25+00:00): Check, dank voor het bericht, Eggie.
Het was inderdaad een beetje puzzelen; ik vond dat oneway niet zo duidelijk, maar logisch dat het standaard niet vermeld is.

De hoofdreden van mijn edit was het opheffen van werkzaamheden (zodat Komoot je er weer gewoon overheen stuurt.)

Groet,
Bram
Fizzie-DWG (2023-08-29 05:53:24+00:00): Reverted by DWG as apparent undiscussed import, possibly using unauthorised data sources & also lack of response

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140522765
mapperue (2024-03-06 09:18:01+00:00): Hi,
you added on this object:
openstreetmap.org/way/1201195280
tag industrial=Embotelladora Gaseosas del Llano. It would be preferable to use a tag that is already documented on OSM Wiki here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:industrial
MapMagics (2023-08-23 17:10:28+00:00): Correction: Source used was Maxar SecureWatch Imagery 2023-03-21
Sparks (2023-09-13 16:14:59+00:00): Is this a formal campsite or just a place that you have camped?
Mark09 (2023-09-28 20:31:54+00:00): I did not camp there, but it was clear that others have before.  There was an established campfire ring and clear, flat space for at least one tent.
LockOnGuy (2023-08-27 10:10:40+00:00): I have reverted this changeset, please don't change the type again.
hrhino (2023-08-23 00:48:22+00:00): Hi! Would landuse=farmland be better than farmland=yes? Wiki says the latter is "not defined", and the former is far more widely used: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dfarmland
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140248575
hatul (2024-11-04 10:30:31+00:00): שלום עזריה
בבקשה לא להוסיף מידע שלא קבוע כמו עומק מים עם תאריך. התיאור מיועד למידע קבוע.
תודה
mariotomo (2023-08-23 09:00:01+00:00): hola. la "tree-row" 1201199951 yo no la veo. será un error de interpretación, o querrás decir otra cosa? te ayudo a mejorarlo, si me cuentas qué es lo que has observado.
Glassman (2023-08-29 19:28:32+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140249064
Glassman (2023-08-29 19:30:23+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140249144
cyclist789 (2026-04-16 18:17:55+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11137339909
De har skrevet "Nordre Vindinge" på byskiltet, men er du sikker på, at det ikke er "Neder Vindinge"? Findes der et "Nordre Vindinge"?

De byskilte, som jeg for nyligt så her, hedder enten "Neder Vindinge" eller "Ndr. Vindinge".
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2026-04-17 10:41:38+00:00): Du har ret. Jeg har rettet det.
Glassman (2023-08-29 19:29:20+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140249256
CurlingMan13 (2023-08-22 23:13:47+00:00): Rather than putting the date in the changeset comments, please put what you changed and why.  thanks.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140249376
tonyf1 (2023-08-24 12:28:13+00:00): Hi, Luc, thanks for your contributions. In your 0 hour block of 17 days ago concerns about your lack of Changeset Comments were raised. Since then you have used the same comment on all changesets. Using the same comment every time is about as much use as no comment at all. Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments and try to provide unique and meaningful comments to all changesets. As a guide, experienced mappers provide unique comments about 50% of the time. Thanks Tony
TheBestIdea (2023-09-06 17:48:52+00:00): Hi Astory,

Another problem here with StreetComplete making left side bike lanes incorrectly contraflow. 

Brandon
silversurfer83 (2023-08-23 13:47:40+00:00): Moin luk :)

warum hast du denn hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1120800662 die information über die Abbiegespuren entfernt? Hat sich da gegenüber dem Luftbild etwas geändert?

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140249564
luk323 (2023-08-23 20:08:32+00:00): ups, habe ich wohl irgendwie ausversehen gelöscht. Hoffe es ist jetzt wieder richtig. Danke für die imfo :)
CurlingMan13 (2023-08-23 01:32:33+00:00): Please use more detailed changeset comments.  "." tells us nothing.  Please describe what you did, why, etc.  You can read more here:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments#:~:text=A%20good%20changeset%20comment%20should,have%20edited%20on%20the%20map.
Yog Sot (2023-08-23 12:25:19+00:00): ten pomost pływa i każdego roku ma inną lokalizację ;)
http://sip.geopoz.pl/sip/nmap/mapa/1/default#

Natomiast bardzo ci dziękuje za trzymanie poziomu i pilnowanie historii edycji
moje_konto (2023-08-23 12:41:35+00:00): Tak właśnie sądziłem, po porównaniu kilku fotomap. Dorysowanie dokładnego obszaru sugeruje jakby był stały, a najpewniej jest to tylko efekt skorzystania z archiwalnej fotomapy.

Więc raczej poprzednia prosta linia była lepsza na taką sytuację. Można też dodać znacznik:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:floating
LockOnGuy (2023-08-23 00:52:50+00:00): Why delete valid names? The names that I added which I took from a tour brochure for tourist tour companies.           
The village name is Ashawa, but the waterfall, the resort, and the lake are named Ashawr according to the tourist brochures I saw, and this is an old name since the 80s and is still used by the tourist and now you removed them entirely...            
You deleted all the names from w1201057555       
You deleted names from w546797681, w1201057549, and n8994200217 and changed them, and now the names I added are deleted and they are the most common names on top of them being in the tourist brochures. If those names are not "official" you could've moved them to alt_name or even loc_name but deleting them like this entirely are not OK.                
You also deleted the tags of w546805598 and now it has no tags.       
Can you fix this and restore the valid names you deleted here?
LockOnGuy (2023-08-23 00:57:41+00:00): Forgot to add: also w1201057543
ڕاستی (2023-08-27 01:14:06+00:00): They are not deleted they are corrected grammatically to official (w546797681, w1201057549, w1201057543 and n8994200217).

(w1201057555) Where do you saw a flow on the surface waterfall?

And about this w546805598 the iD Editor mentioned as a doubled way so I just clicked fix button.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140250544
ڕاستی (2023-08-27 01:17:55+00:00): And the names you mentioned as deleted, the English and Arabic names were grammatically wrong. I changed a single letter (Ashawr to Ashawa) (اشاور to اشاوا). That's all what I did with the names.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140250544
LockOnGuy (2023-08-27 05:31:00+00:00): "They are not deleted" No, they ARE deleted, show me where the words "Ashawr" and "اشاور" are?      
The names I added are mentioned by the tourist companies, and on the brochures. If you don't understand the Arabic language you shall not edit the name:ar and changed it to match the Kurdish one.       
See all of these tourist companies said "Ashawr":     
* https://www.facebook.com/watch/live/?ref=watch_permalink&v=385513113655310      
* https://www.facebook.com/AlNabalaTravelTourismCompany/posts/pfbid02f66KtggHNRACw7mYy1m3qSdhbpau8545YCbDmW8Z3KXJVr4QedAxtLbxCfk8XYoUl      
* https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=pfbid02GAEwUoGecZHAzSV4FRSNhM6X5n7V9bKfUsHQmXw3PfKKVKNi52zundQjS6Ej2EF9l&id=2149618308423708         
An      
As I said, If those names are not "official" you could've moved them to alt_name or even loc_name but deleting them like this entirely are not OK.          
Can you fix this and restore the valid names you deleted here?
ڕاستی (2023-08-28 13:06:12+00:00): I changed name because they are not official and not moved to loc_name because the population are Kurdish if there is a local should be in Kurdish name not Arabic one.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140250544
LockOnGuy (2023-08-28 13:10:16+00:00): Will you restore the names you deleted or not?
ڕاستی (2023-08-28 15:54:46+00:00): And will stop ignoring the facts.
I told they are official, and I get that information from government sources.
You give an advertisement post from Facebook account as a source. Then tell me it is valid and official.
LockOnGuy (2023-08-28 16:00:58+00:00): I have surveyed the location before and I saw the names on the brochures as I told you before.       
I provided you with sources and links of tour companies referring to the resort with this name too, and told you, it is okay if you change them to official if they are not, but you should've moved them to alt_name instead of removing them entirely!      
Deleting such names is deleting valid data, and it's vandalism if you refuse to restore what you deleted.     
Do you still refuse to add them back?
AjBelnuovo (2024-01-28 17:38:32+00:00): Qual é a fonte que usou para nomear as vias ?
 E por que o nome do conjunto residencial foi trocado ?
Douglasvip (2024-01-28 20:31:00+00:00): A fonte das Vias: https://leismunicipais.com.br/a/se/n/nossa-senhora-do-socorro/lei-ordinaria/2022/156/1555/lei-ordinaria-n-1555-2022-dispoe-acerca-da-denominacao-das-ruas-do-complexo-habitacional-padre-jose-enaldo-menezes-de-rezende-na-sede-do-municipio-de-nossa-senhora-do-socorro-e-da-outras-providencias?q=padre%20enaldo

https://leismunicipais.com.br/a/se/n/nossa-senhora-do-socorro/lei-ordinaria/2022/160/1593/lei-ordinaria-n-1593-2022-dispoe-acerca-da-denominacao-das-ruas-do-complexo-habitacional-padre-jose-enaldo-menezes-de-rezende-na-sede-do-municipio-de-nossa-senhora-do-socorro-e-da-outras-providencias?q=padre%20enaldo

A fonte do local que se tornou um Bairro: LEI Nº 1.487, Art. 13 Inciso III DE 15 DE ABRIL DE 2021
https://leismunicipais.com.br/a/se/n/nossa-senhora-do-socorro/lei-ordinaria/2021/149/1487/lei-ordinaria-n-1487-2021-dispoe-sobre-a-delimitacao-de-distritos-e-a-criacao-de-bairros-no-municipio-de-nossa-senhora-do-socorro-e-da-outras-providencias?q=1487

MAIS ALGUMA DÚVIDA???
AjBelnuovo (2024-01-28 22:09:45+00:00): Sim , há uma dúvida . Se você é morador do local saberia quais eram os nomes antigos das vias , se não você simplesmente pegou 2 informações e utilizou aquilo que consta no Google Maps para nomear as vias .
Na imagem de fundo do IBGE , usando o ID , não tem os nomes antigos .
E normalmente , quando se mapeia , procurasse manter as informações anteriores , tipo - Rua 01,levaria a tag old_name

A informação da página Leis Municipais , eu já tinha há algum tempo , e não há usei por não ter a referência do nome antigo , e normalmente quando se mapeia e tem a fonte , ela colocada pra servir de orientação aos demais mapeadores .

Nos 3 links enviados não constam os limites geográficos dos bairros e não é alterado o nome do conjunto habitacional, aliás o nome do conjunto é colocado para que se nomeie as vias .
Douglasvip (2024-01-29 00:31:12+00:00): Amigo, acredito que você não é daqui, vamos lá...
além de eu ser ser morador, presto serviço nesta área para a secretária de planejamento do município. Você me pediu fontes e eu te mandei as fontes. Saiba que o Google Maps, OpenStreetMap e qualquer outro não são fontes. Você citou o IBGE, que além ser desatualizado, eles as vezes utilizam informações do Google Maps. Então se você usa as informações do IBGE, você está correndo risco de editar errado. O Bairro Castelo em Nossa Senhora do Socorro não mostra seus logradouros por que é um Bairro novo. Outra coisa... Pelo menos aqui para endereçamento e geolocalização, não se dá importância para endereçamento os loteamentos, conjuntos e residenciais quando o logradouro não é nomeado com letras e números. Isso já é padrão dos correios aqui. Caso queira ver as limitações dos Bairros de Nossa Senhora do Socorro você encontrará no Google Maps atualizado por mim ou um mapa postado por mim na pagina da Wikipédia da cidade. Então amigo pode ficar tranquilo sobre minhas edições, pois todas tem fundamentos verídicos diretos da verdadeira fonte. Não tome como surpresa quando perceber futuramente que todos os logradouros nomeados por letras e números daqui da cidade tenham sido mudados por mim pois estou elaborando um projeto justamente para isso.
AjBelnuovo (2024-01-29 00:50:22+00:00): Me desculpe , mas OSM não é fonte , só que não aceita dados do Google como fonte .
O fato de você trabalhar na secretaria de planejamento não o desobriga de colocar as fontes usadas .
Até onde eu sei o IBGE não usa informações do Google , assim fosse não existiria dezenas de milhares de vias no Brasil sem ter denominação .
Quando falei sobre coordenadas é porque isto é citado num dos links que enviou , que estaria em dois anexos que não vieram junto com o documento e estariam no Diário Oficial e o Diário Oficial só foi digitalizado a partir de 2022.
Por ex. você colocou como Prefeitura de Nossa Senhora do Socorro , um local que seria uma garagem ou seja o local não é o Paço Municipal , e provavelmente tem um nome e é subordinado a uma secretaria do município , e são estes os nomes do local e do operador .
Morando no local você ´poderia inserir a localização de pontos de ônibus dentro do conjunto residencial por onde passa a linha 901 ( http://www.smttaju.com.br/smtt/transporte/itinerario-e-horario-dos-onibus/2151-901-socorro-terminal-marcos-freire )
eerib (2023-08-23 01:00:57+00:00): I also used the Strava Heatmap for help with the path at the rec site.
Hufkratzer (2023-08-23 20:19:21+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1201221105 looks like a riding arena (and not like a riding center); riding arenas are usually tagged leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian, compare https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dhorse_riding
There is a special preset for them in iD, search for "riding arena"
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-13 10:48:03+00:00): Thank you for mapping. The mapping looks great and also the changeset comment. Happy Mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140252377
(Inactive) hayduke1275 (2023-09-26 22:39:29+00:00): Why did you remove the private tag? This is the entrance to a gated community. Private access means only those with individual permission may access. See the wiki here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
GrabID_UmiZumroh (2023-09-27 05:28:26+00:00): Hi hayduke1275

The access=private tag already added to the Way ID in this Changeset: 127313431.

For the access tag on the barrier that I removed, I have updated it according to your feedback.

Thank You.
itineris (2025-08-30 20:01:11+00:00): Hi,

What is your source of information?
 
For the section between road 8714 and the border station, I see a sign with 90. In the opposite direction there's no sign with 100 so it defaults to 90.

From road 8714 towards East only, there is a 100 sign.

Data from Magyar Közút (Hungarian Public Roads) also confirms these.

Ákos
nevw (2023-08-23 12:22:03+00:00): Hi, you appear to have deleted a large building adjacent Francis Street. This building is still visible on satellite imagery.
WwAVIC (2023-08-24 04:39:51+00:00): Hi nevw, thanks for that, I have added them back in - they are no longer open for the public to access.
oba510 (2023-08-23 08:58:54+00:00): Please don't make test edits directly to OSM, thanks.
sannkc (2023-08-27 04:05:55+00:00): Saint Louis is the unabbreviated form of St. Louis, not a misspelling.  There are many local institutions and businesses that utilize Saint Louis without it being considered a misspelling.  These include the Saint Louis Public Schools, Saint Louis Zoo, Saint Louis Science Center, Saint Louis Art Museum, Fair Saint Louis, Saint Louis University, among others.  At least three neighborhood associations use Saint Louis: Saint Louis Hills, Old North Saint Louis, and Soulard Saint Louis. The USPS uses Saint Louis as well.  I can share more examples if you need them.
Zol87 (2023-08-28 19:11:48+00:00): Sorry, I was going by the spelling on the official City of St. Louis Website
https://www.stlouis-mo.gov/
sannkc (2023-08-29 00:40:53+00:00): No worries, all is well.  The abbreviation is very widely used, including on the city's website, so the unabbreviated form can definitely seem odd.  In the end, though, it's just an abbreviation, so the policy on abbreviations kicks in.  

I know you've done a lot of great work on Chicago, and STL would benefit from similar work if you are so inclined.  It doesn't have very many regular mappers.  I jump in and work on the city from time to time, but there's still a lot to be done.