piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2025-06-28 14:56:01+00:00): Hello Deng Armstrong Munah, welcome to OSM, and thank you for your contributions!

I've taken a look at your recent edits and wanted to discuss a few discrepancies I noticed regarding the surrounding environmental features. Specifically, the locations in your edits don't seem to align with the typical geographical characteristics expected in that area. Here are some (max 10) relevant links to the edits:
https://osm.org/node/12889045001

Could you please take a look?
Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#Somewhere
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=167229101
NeisReview (2025-07-02 12:22:28+00:00): Corrected by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167269319
SpinOff (2025-06-06 19:48:37+00:00): Hej. W tagu name podajemy tylko oficjalne nazwy. Wszelkie opisy właściwości obiektu muszą się znaleźć w innych tagch.

Poprawiłem już ten maszt. Tutaj jest więcej informacji: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:communication:mobile_phone
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-06-09 17:40:59+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/543508093/history - to chyba nie jest peron?
rivermont (2025-06-21 20:28:40+00:00): Hi,
Please refrain from connecting landuse areas to roads, paths, and other features. These things exist independent of each other and should not use the same nodes in the database even if they are close to each other.
Kendall County GIS (2025-06-13 15:48:21+00:00): make sure to update your changeset comment as you work on other mapping tasks
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167231244
dcskobuffs (2025-06-05 16:41:41+00:00): Correction: source used was Esri World Imagery; Mapillary
maro21 (2025-06-05 20:43:56+00:00): Poprosiłeś o przejrzenie edycji, to zapytam: Czemu podzielenie chodnika na dwie części, skoro dałeś taką samą nawierzchnię? :)
Omikorin (2025-06-06 08:09:10+00:00): Widzę, że mój komentarz się nie dodał.

Jak pracowałem nad tym, to zacząłem się zastanawiać czy po tej kostce brukowej zaczyna się zwykły beton, płyta (bo na pewno nie pasy z płyt) tj. czy to będzie ta sama nawierzchnia, czy nie.
Zostawiłem już to, ale po jakimś czasie widzę, że inne chodniki (Ukryta) o podobnej budowie są jedną linią jako jedna nawierzchnia, więc myślę, że można to zamknąć. Głównie to połączenie zwężenia i zmiany kostki zmusiło mnie do pytania
Fizzie-DWG (2025-06-06 00:22:29+00:00): Hello Nahco1013. As has been mentioned to you previously, please DO NOT delete features then redraw them! Please just modify the existing features so that they're correct. Thanks.
user_22926499 (2025-06-06 02:00:54+00:00): I'm sorry. I copied the labels of the deleted features onto the labels of the redrawn features. May I ask if this is allowed. If not allowed, I will never delete many features and redraw them again.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-06-06 02:32:08+00:00): It's just that when you delete something, all of it's history is lost, but if you just correct any wrong details, then anybody can see that it was actually created by this person back then, then you moved / adjusted it.
user_22926499 (2025-06-06 02:47:04+00:00): oh I'm very sorry, I got it! That would lose a lot of things, I really shouldn't delete them. Thank you, I swear I will never do that again. I can still delete features that have already been removed in reality, right?
Fizzie-DWG (2025-06-06 03:26:54+00:00): Thanks! If e.g. a building has been demolished, but is still visible on imagery, you should use one of the lifecycle tags: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix#Stages_of_decay, together with a note to say that it's not there any more. Only delete it if there's no trace left of it on the ground, or in imagery.
Marek-M (2025-06-05 20:23:54+00:00): Cześć, czy są tam znaki zakazu wjazdu rowerem?
Mr ŁOZO (2025-06-06 06:34:15+00:00): Cześć. Znaków zakazu nie ma. Ale przedept pieszy nie nadaje się do jazdy rowerem. Jak inaczej to oznaczyć ?
Marek-M (2025-06-06 14:58:31+00:00): Jeżeli jest tam bardzo wąsko, to można dodać atrybut `width=0.5`. Nie zabroni to wjazdu rowerzystom ale niektóre nawigacje mogą to uwzględniać.

Nie ma ustalonego tagowania do oznaczania dróg, które rowerzyści powinni omijać ale ustawienie `bicycle=no` bez znaków zakazu nie jest poprawne.

Można jeszcze dodawać tagi dodatkowe, które są np. opisane na wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Rowery#Off-road_i_outdoor
eggie (2025-06-05 18:22:46+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback: Alle begin is moeilijk.Of iets is een tunnel.. of iets is een viaduct.
Het kan niet beide zijn.
Ook zal die tunnel niet zo lang zijn. 
access=permissive...  Waarom? 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-06-05 18:36:59+00:00): Ik heb de tunnel weer verwijderd en de stukken onder het viaduct getagd met cocered=yes.
Voorlopig access=permissive verwijderd  of mag toch niet iedereen hier komen en onder bepaalde voorwaarde wel? 

MVG
eggie
PixelIsHere (2025-06-05 18:48:43+00:00): Sorry voor de onhandigheid, het is een onderdoorgang van de a30 die voor alle verkeer geopend is van oost kant naar west kant, uitgezonderd lijnbussen die mogen allebij de kanten op, het viaduct is 4,1m hoog. Ik zal het de volgende keer niet meer via de telefoon te doen, is toch lastig werken excuses.

Mvg
Jeroen
eggie (2025-06-05 19:01:14+00:00): Ahh  Oke..  Er wordt je overigens niet kwalijk genomen.
Dan zou het eenrichting zijn oneway=yes met uitzondering oneway:psv =no ? 
en waarschijnlijk oneway:emergency=no
psv=yes gaat dan niet helpen.

Welke bebording staat hier?
Groet
eggie
eggie (2025-06-05 19:05:07+00:00): In 2022 was het nog een busbaan
Er stonden C1 borden.
https://smoothefiets.ddns.net/html/verkeersbordenkaart/index.php?lat=52.030148776&lng=5.613970757&z=18
Wat staat er nu.. Dan kan het correct worden aangepast. Nu routeert het van beide kanten voor regulier verkeer.
eggie (2025-06-05 19:13:33+00:00): Ik heb het aangepast naar oneway=yes van oost naar west met uitzonderingen voor bus en hulpdiensten
Bron OBLIEK Slagboom en Peeters 5-3-2025
Groet
eggie
eggie (2025-06-05 19:22:23+00:00): maxheight=4.1 toegevoegd
b-jazz (2025-06-06 05:06:06+00:00): Thanks for cleaning up the boundary between the fairway and the green. The same type of boundary rules apply to the boundary between fairways and bunkers like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1391822912. You can either share nodes between the bunker and the fairway, or you can leave a gap like was done with the bunker on the opposite side of the fairway. Whichever you feel is appropriate. Thanks!
btertin (2025-06-06 11:16:50+00:00): No problem and thanks for the input. Yes, this course has space between the fairway and the bunker. There is rough there, so I haven't shared any nodes. In general, if something exists on the map I don't change anything, but there are some streams mapped in these areas that are really bad. They aren't anywhere close to the actual stream. Just letting someone who obviously cares about the area know about it. It shouldn't affect anything I'm doing. Thanks again!
b-jazz (2025-06-06 17:26:22+00:00): I just ran a database query for the US to find out how many streams cross greens and fairways. There are hundreds of them (if not more). It seems highly unlikely that a stream is going to cut straight through a bunker or across a green. No grounds crew  or course designer would allow that in my experience. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/41511216 for example.
Illio (2026-02-25 16:16:17+00:00): Dobrý deň, môžete uviesť zdroj názvu ulice "Koliba Gardens"?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1301914539
Filip009 (2026-02-25 16:46:29+00:00): Zdravím, názov bol pridaný v tretej verzii danej cesty https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1301914539/history/3
AR_Mapper (2025-06-05 18:57:48+00:00): On site signage confirms cycling on marked tracks is allowed. Imagery - https://mapillary.com/map/im/1571786813602654
eggie (2025-06-05 18:52:07+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Volge ns het Kadaster is hier 81 A en 81 
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/?searchQuery=mauritskade+81&objectId=0518200001735768&theme=BRT+Achtergrond&geometry.x=81269.30246625465&geometry.y=455883.3194648235&zoomlevel=15.576
Wanneer iets niet klopt kun je dat beter doorgeven aan het Kadaster. 
Voorlopig ga ik van het Kadster uit (BAG data teruggezet) 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-06-05 18:54:33+00:00): 81B bestaat niet volgens het Kadaster.
Doe je zelf een terugmelding (zie BAG) als hier iets niet klopt. Adressen en gebouwen krijgen regelmatig een update vanuit de BAG.
Gr eggie
eggie (2025-06-05 18:57:55+00:00): Nr 81 weer compleet gemaakt en op de nieuwe locatie gezet. Doe je zelf een terugmelding?
Groet
eggie
evil_noodles (2025-06-05 19:09:52+00:00): Hi, I am not sure about the process of updating the BAG. I will do some googling. I have been renting 81 (above Bouzy) for almost a decade, but over the last few years, I have stopped receiving any mail, as it is lost to 81a/b.
eggie (2025-06-05 19:16:52+00:00): You are right I think and the Dutch Registry (Kadaster) is outdated. 
Sop You may send a message to the Kadaster. See link above.
In OSM it's okay for now. 81B is still missing. 
Greetz,
eggie
evil_noodles (2025-06-05 19:23:46+00:00): Thanks, I requested the changes through the link you provided. Hopefully it's successful. Appreciate the assistance!
jb54osm (2025-06-06 10:54:07+00:00): I noticed the error in BAG as well. Watched some 'old pictures'. But didn't have the time to make the 'melding'. The current meldingen should do the trick.
citrula (2025-06-05 22:43:08+00:00): In these edits you added a new way on top of the existing one - this doesn't actually mark the trail as closed, you need to modify the parts of the existing way instead. 

If you need help doing this, let me know!
VLD082 (2025-06-11 19:35:56+00:00): Hello MihanJhaveri,

I am reaching out to ask about some of your recent edits. Several crossing nodes have been placed at the corners of intersections rather than directly at the points where the crossing intersects the road feature, as outlined in the OSM Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dcrossing). Could you please clarify the rationale behind adding the crossing nodes in this manner?

Additionally, in this changeset, crossings that have traffic signals visible in street-level imagery have been changed to crossing=uncontrolled, with the crossing:signals=yes tag remaining in place. These tags are contradictory; according to the wiki, crossing=uncontrolled is intended for crossings that are marked but lack any crossing controls or signals (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:crossing%3Duncontrolled).

Best regards,  
VLD082
dknelson9876 (2025-06-08 03:18:20+00:00): I was curious about the roads in this area. Thanks for taking the time to survey!
Supaplex (2025-06-06 01:48:00+00:00): 台灣應該沒有多少餐廳有星等評級，如果是收Google地圖網友評價的話，可能不是很適合
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167237194
grzegorz75jan (2025-06-06 05:17:56+00:00): Skoro to takie drobne zmiany to dlaczego tak ciężko napisać trochę szerzej czego dotyczy edycja i tak jest też w poprzednich z "opisami"

W Achavi obszar zachodzi na sąsiednie kraje.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian

https://youtu.be/xBMIoypkdI4?list=PLTgtPjgzssHzsgAqYbi2QfRoRk1S9ioX5&t=2596
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167237624
micheleOSM3 (2025-06-06 06:40:11+00:00): Per favore non cancellare le note se non sai a cosa servono, nel caso specifico le note di questo tipo:
Il CAI ha in progetto di chiamarlo 316F, #CAI-GPX=316F#
micheleOSM3 (2025-06-06 06:46:30+00:00): Inoltre le tue modifiche ai nomi sono in contrasto con il sito ufficiale CAI
https://www.cai-fvg.it/sentieri-cai-fvg/settore-3-dolomiti-friulane-alpi-prealpi-carniche/ferrata-regolo-corbellini-2/ 

da dove hai rilevato i nomi che tu ritieni corretti?
micheleOSM3 (2025-06-06 15:04:14+00:00): Inoltre se una way è una via ferrata, si mappa così: highway=via_ferrata via_ferrata_scale=n ed eventualmente sac_scale=..
asashi (2025-06-06 20:31:47+00:00): Il "Sentiero Corbellini" si chiama esattamente così, è della sezione di Tolmezzo di cui sono il presidente, quindi il nome resta quello.
Inoltre ho cancellato la nota perché la dicitura 316F è in completo contrasto con il catasto REI a livello italiano e NON verrà mai usata sui cartelli, sulle mappe e sui sentieri!
Idem uso improprio della nomenclatura da parte del CAI FVG
asashi (2025-06-06 20:34:11+00:00): il sentiero che sale alla forca dell'alpino sotto alla ferrata GAS NON è una ferrata!!!
asashi (2025-06-06 20:50:47+00:00): Se permetti le modifiche che ho fatto che riguardano i nomi sono corrette, la mia è l'unica versione giusta, quella riportata su tutte le guide e mappe da decine e decine di anni.
Dove ho tolto la classificazione ferrata è perché NON è ferrata.
Le denominazioni come 316F semplicemente non esistono, non devono essere rese pubbliche.
Se il CAI FVG cambia e inventa i nomi delle cose come "Via Ferrata al Creton di Culzei" che mai è esistita non è libero di farlo!
micheleOSM3 (2025-06-10 14:21:58+00:00): Ti ho scritto una email sui vari punti sollevati, possiamo proseguire lì?
savsk (2025-06-06 10:36:01+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1392422040 & https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1392422041 - co to jest i po co to jest? Szpeci mapę.
Wandel-Appeltje (2025-06-05 19:17:19+00:00): Deze 'omleiding' staat ook in het boekje.  Hierdoor worden enkele wegstukken dus 2x in de relatie opgenomen (Clarissenstraat en oude kerkstraat).  dus hopelijk is dit de juiste oplossing
stillhart (2025-06-07 16:36:48+00:00): https://www.srf.ch/play/tv/schweiz-aktuell/video/blatten-vs-notstrasse-ab-freitag-in-betrieb?urn=urn:srf:video:e40f3db6-0756-4a9e-b367-541a9a65bd97

Scheint jetzt bereit zu sein
stillhart (2025-06-07 16:36:58+00:00): Minute 1:44
Wandel-Appeltje (2025-06-05 19:46:09+00:00): Ik kreeg een warning:

Maar over een ANDERE route (Dommelpad - 6) dus heb de warning genegeerd:

Role verification problem - Role of relation member does not match template expression 'highway || route=ferry'  in preset Hiking Route (1)
route 'Dommelpad - 6 - Sint-Oedenrode - Boxtel'
eggie (2025-06-05 20:48:57+00:00): Hoi  Die verificatie foutmeldingen kun je gewoon negeren.
MVG
eggie
user_5359 (2025-06-06 14:51:35+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/33297306. What is the mean of the tag "layer 1"="22"?
Elizen (2025-06-10 16:18:29+00:00): Здравствуйте.
Вы уточняете границы населённых пунктов, при этом удаляя существующую границу (Сургут - https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2705674, Солнечный - https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3557343, Барсово - https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2705674) и рисуя новую (Сургут - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1392437632, Солнечный - https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19215201, Барсово - https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19215200). Можно же было переиспользовать линии из отношения (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2705674) и история объекта сохранилась бы.
Elizen (2025-06-10 16:37:02+00:00): Также вы оставили линии без тегов, с которых удалили отношение.
Не могли бы вы восстановить удалённые отношения и уже редактировать эти линии, чтобы сохранить историю границ населённых пунктов?
Stalker61 (2025-06-10 16:46:42+00:00): Здравствуйте.
Это что за чудеса. С каких пор данные генпланов НП перестали быть валидными? Вы ничего не попутали? DWG видимо вам в помощь.
Stalker61 (2025-06-10 16:48:35+00:00): Elizen. Спокойствие. Будет откат. В DWG я уже обратился.
Stalker61 (2025-06-10 16:50:16+00:00): На форуме тоже отметили это мастерство https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/https-atd-openstreetmap-ru/65879/1870
Stalker61 (2025-06-11 03:54:53+00:00): https://atd.openstreetmap.ru/r1128590.html
Stalker61 (2025-06-11 03:56:54+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167240691#map=11/61.0811/72.6144
Stalker61 (2025-06-11 04:09:25+00:00): А вот это шедевр - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1392437629#map=17/61.309959/73.159606
Глеб (2025-06-11 06:59:26+00:00): Извините, сделаю аккуратнее
Глеб (2025-06-11 07:01:35+00:00): Вернул
Stalker61 (2025-06-12 06:28:16+00:00): Elizen. Не всегда история сохраняется. Вот из простого полигона создал мультиполигон. История канула в небытие, хоть и сделано по всем правилам
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19245400#map=14/61.27023/73.25838
Elizen (2025-06-13 13:17:32+00:00): Да, я понимаю. Но в данном случае не всегда полигоны заменялись мультиполигонами. Удалялся один полигон и на его месте рисовался новый (например, Белый Яр: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/51676533 и https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1392437631), тоже самое и с мультиполигонами (например, Барсово: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19215200 и https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2705674).
Stalker61 (2025-06-13 14:13:53+00:00): Нет не так. Вернее суть не в этом. Многие нынешние редакторы пользуются только ПКК, а это путь в никуда. Основа всему генплан. В ПКК отражены административные и полигональные границы НП. Если административные границы относительно верны (не для всех регионов), то полигональные зачастую нарисованы от балды. 
К примеру тот же Сургутский район. В Генпланах адмграницы показаны очень хорошо, а полигональные отражены вообще частично. Хотя тот же ПКК дает сведения об адресации вне указанного полигона НП, но относящегося к этому самому НП. Вот так и решался в своё время ребус по адресации в Барсово.
Stalker61 (2025-06-13 14:16:29+00:00): В Белом Яре нынешние адмграницы и полигональные практически совпадают. Поэтому я и создал мультиполигон place с частичным совпадением с мультиполигоном административной границы.
Stalker61 (2025-06-13 14:24:09+00:00): То что Глеб поудалял фактически верные данные мультиполигона и создал один упрощенный полигон не от великого ума. Такие случаи попадаются достаточно часто. Очень похожая ситуация к примеру в ЯНАО Салехард микрорайон Аэропорт. Адреска относящаяся к Салехарду есть, но в полигоне города ни Генплане, ни в ПКК не отражена. Посему уже другой редактор перепилил полигон города и доволен. В результате имеем битую адреску недоступную для поиска и навигации..
Stalker61 (2025-06-14 05:54:55+00:00): Порой найти достоверную информацию стоит немалого труда.
Возьмем Когалым. Административную и полигональную границу нашел на сайте городской администрации https://admkogalym.ru/administration/structure/architecture/dokumenty-/generalnyy-plan-goroda-/index.php
ВНЕСЕНИЕ ИЗМЕНЕНИЙ В ГЕНЕРАЛЬНЫЙ ПЛАН
Карта функциональных зон городского округа
Теперь буду делать актуализацию полигональной границы. Ибо опять адреска вылетает в никуда.
Stalker61 (2025-06-14 05:59:11+00:00): К чему я это пишу? Да к тому, что границами МО, НП и т.п. нужно заниматься тщательно, а ПКК использовать только как источник вспомогательной информации. Генпланы это юридическая основа информации данной категории. Росреестр никакой ответственности за такую информацию не несет и нести никогда не будет.
Comino (2025-06-06 14:38:19+00:00): Hi Tabacoetesoura,

In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes".

Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag !
Only use "currency:XBT=yes" instead.

For more information please read : https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Merchants

Happy mapping,

Edwin
Decarvalho7 (2025-06-30 16:54:41+00:00): Leve em consideração as proporções espaciais da região Amazônica, que são muito mais amplas que em muitos outros locais. A Rodovia Transamazônica BR-230 é uma rodovia federal ou seja, classificação de mais alta patente no Brasil para estradas. No trecho em questão a Rod. Transamazônica liga a cidade de Itaituba a Jacareacanga no estado do Pará, Jacareacanga a cidade de Apuí na divisa dos estados do Pará e Amazonas e por fim, as cidades de Apuí e Humaitá no estado do Amazonas.
Decarvalho7 (2025-06-30 16:59:56+00:00): Esta rodovia federal já era para estar totalmente pavimentada na sua integralidade. Mas questões políticas e ambientais atrasam a conclusão da obra. A pavimentação vem ocorrendo no sentido Leste para o Oeste de forma gradativa e conforme as licenças ambientais são liberadas e os trechos da rodovia são abertos para licitação de pavimentação pelo governo federal do Brasil.
kaartense (2025-07-01 00:00:08+00:00): Olá Decarvalho7,

Obrigado pelo contato. 

A regra vigente, acordada pela comunidade, restringe trunk e primary à vias pavimentadas. E trunk deve ser a melhor rota entre cidades com mais de 200 mil habitantes dentro de um determinado raio. Regra disponível em [1]. Contudo, pode-se abrir exceções se a comunidade entrar em acordo.

Quanto ao caso em si, entendo que a região norte é uma situação diferenciada no país. Neste caso poderia se abrir uma exceção e/ou rever essa situação. Aparentemente seria a melhor rota terrestre de Santarém a Manaus.

Vou entrar em contato com a comunidade para ouvir uma terceira opinião.

[1] - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brazil/Classifica%C3%A7%C3%A3o_das_rodovias_do_Brasil
kaartense (2025-07-01 02:44:11+00:00): Junte-se ao grupo para discutir a situação. https://telegram.me/OSMBrasil_Comunidade
ftrebien (2025-07-01 04:56:37+00:00): Pelo menos provisoriamente, acho que o melhor é classificar essa via como primária. É importante seguir o acordo de 2020, mas também é imporante debater os casos especiais.

Conta contra promover à classe troncal o fato de ser um trecho de 1000 km sem pavimentação, o que seria algo bem único no país. Quando a comunidade (em conjunto) abriu uma exceção para a BR-163, a pavimentação já estava perto de ser concluída, enquanto que nesse trecho da BR-230 não há sequer indício de que alguma obra vai iniciar ali nos próximos anos. Mas conta a favor o fato de ser um trecho vital para a região.[1] É debatível se ela é, para a maioria das pessoas, a rota principal entre duas capitais (Belém e Porto Velho), parece que em alguns casos é preferível dar uma volta mais longa para evitar esse percurso mais precário. Se fosse pavimentada, com certeza seria a rota principal. É um caso no limite das nossas definições, com opiniões bastante divergentes. O ideal seria continuar o debate no Telegram.

Em muitos países, uma via com essas características jamais seria considerada troncal. Por exemplo, no Canadá, a estrada que liga as capitais provinciais de Whitehorse e Yellowknife tem um trecho de 430 km sem pavimentação classificado como primário. Em outros, algumas vias assim são troncais. Por exemplo, no extremo-oriente, a estrada que liga Yakutsk a Magadan na Sibéria (Rússia) é troncal e tem mais de 1600 km contínuos sem pavimentação.

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway#Assumptions
ftrebien (2025-07-01 15:28:43+00:00): Lembrei que há balsa de veículos de Santarém a Manaus e outra de Manaus a Porto Velho. A viagem leva dias, mas é o meio preferido para os transportes de carga justamente porque a estrada não oferece boas condições. Acho que isso reforça que a BR-230 seja algo menos que troncal nessa área. De Itaituba a Humaitá, há algumas povoações com mais de 20 mil habitantes (Jacareacanga e Apuí) que não são atendidas por balsa e cujo único acesso é pela BR-230, acho que isso reforça a classificação dessa rota como primária.
Stalker61 (2025-06-11 03:56:31+00:00): https://atd.openstreetmap.ru/r1129847.html
Глеб (2025-06-11 07:16:42+00:00): вернул
Đuro Jiří (2025-06-07 11:54:54+00:00): Ciao mascalzone67,sai che questo punto vendita apre 12.Gugno? E sicuramente edificio non è così grande. Correggo io, quando faccio sopralluogo,ora è strada chiusa per la manifestazione sportiva.
Saluti
BlumleinPear (2025-07-19 07:22:53+00:00): You have added address features to dozens of nodes.
jeslop (2025-06-06 17:03:04+00:00): Hola Gino01, bienvenido a OSM. ¿Estás seguro que hay algún tipo de institución educativa aquí?
Lo elimino.

Saludos,
Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group