piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Glassman (2026-05-16 18:05:11+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182716920
Tatfahren (2026-05-15 21:36:34+00:00): Hallo Waldmax und willkommen bei OpenStreetMap,
Bei OSM müssen wir leider stets auf die legale Verwendbarkeit der Quellen achten, da wir die Daten sonst nicht unter der offenen Lizenz weitergeben können. Häufig sind Betreiber kritischer Infrastruktur nicht sonderlich erfreut wenn wir ihre Leitungsverläufe eintragen. Hast du eine Genehmigung für die Verwendung des Artikels von Ontras sowie deren Plan den sie im Lommatzscher Amtsblatt abgedruckt haben?

Bei den anderen changesets hast du als Quelle nur "knowledge" angegeben. Was hast du dort genau verwendet, also woher stammt dieses "knowledge" ?
Tatfahren (2026-05-15 21:39:09+00:00): Die korrekte Quellenangabe bei solchen Leitungsdaten ist sehr wichtig, damit wir keine Angriffspunkte für mögliche zukünftige Klagen der Leitungsbetreiber bieten.
Waldmax (2026-05-15 21:50:26+00:00): Hallo Tatfahren, vielen Dank für das Willkommen und die mühevolle Arbeit beim Nachzeichnen unterirdischer Pipelines. Sowohl der ONTRAS-Presseartikel als auch das Amtsblatt sind öffentlich abrufbar. Sollte dies aus Gründen problematisch sein, entferne ich diese gerne. Die Änderungen, bei denen ich "nur" Knowledge angegeben habe, basieren darauf, dass ich die Verläufe und Kennzeichnungen vor Ort auf öffentlich zugänglichen Gebiet angesehen habe. Teilweise existieren auch Fotos. Grüße
pmckay419 (2026-06-09 23:40:22+00:00): I see you deleted a bunch of dispersed campsites in this area. Those campsites still exist and the BLM is proposing to reopen several closed roads leading to them. These deletions were vandalism and I have added all the campsites back.
Glassman (2026-05-16 18:05:27+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182717318
dcapillae (2026-05-16 06:51:19+00:00): Hola.

¿Por qué «operator=EMTSAM;Portillo» en la línea 9? https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5344033

¿No es una línea exclusiva de la EMT?
rochirochi (2026-05-16 07:05:39+00:00): La línea la llevan la EMT y Portillo
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-16 07:21:19+00:00): Malicious XSS/HTML injection attempt via OSM tag. Attempts to exfiltrate user/session info to an external WebSocket endpoint.

Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182727124
Fizzie-DWG (2026-05-17 22:09:05+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20568
Glassman (2026-05-16 18:05:42+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182717571
cubbe8 (2026-05-16 04:26:24+00:00): This is federal functional classification, which is not correct. These are minor arterials which are primary roads. 
https://gis.data.mass.gov/datasets/massgis::massgis-massdot-roads/explore?filters=eyJDTEFTUyI6WzEsNl0sIkZfQ0xBU1MiOlszLDNdfQ%3D%3D&location=42.375132%2C-71.028131%2C14
StreetSurveyor (2026-05-16 05:41:28+00:00): That interpretation is clearly incorrect. The map I used was the official site:
https://gis.data.mass.gov/datasets/MassDOT::functional-classification

It explicitly shows the roadway classifications for all the roads used under the state’s own guidelines. 
If the map were simply showing all airport roads as “minor arterials,” then roads leading directly into the airport that are clearly motorway-standard and already mapped as motorway would also fall under that same logic, which obviously does not make sense from an OSM classification standpoint. 

The classification viewer clearly distinguishes different hierarchy levels across the airport road network. Based on that data, the roads I corrected were correct per the state’s classification.
StreetSurveyor (2026-05-16 05:57:15+00:00): Also, from the website I provided: “this layer shows both the state and federal classification of roadways.” 

Given that, and based on the classifications shown in the official viewer provided, the current tagging is now correct per the state’s own published data. Please don’t change it again.
Glassman (2026-05-16 18:05:58+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182717805
eggie (2026-05-15 21:07:29+00:00): Hoi,

Ik heb de G11 accesstaggging toegevoegd.

Fietspaden taggen we als volgt.
G11: mofa=yes, moped=no, traffic_sign=NL:G11
G12a: moped=designated, mofa=designated, traffic_sign=NL:G12a
G13: moped=no, mofa=no, traffic_sign=NL:G13

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Cycleway

Mapse,
eggie
DrBreakalot (2026-05-15 21:59:31+00:00): Ik zal er in de toekomst om denken
Glassman (2026-05-16 18:01:57+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182718258
quincylvania (2026-06-03 14:58:26+00:00): FYI it looks like you missed a few small segments like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/40594933
AriAlvarez (2026-07-09 23:24:39+00:00): I see, my bad
Glassman (2026-05-16 18:06:27+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182719116
Jonaes (2026-05-15 22:05:33+00:00): Bearbeitugskonflikt mit changeset/182718949
Piagno (2026-05-15 22:42:59+00:00): ich war zur selben Zeit die Relationen auf ptv2 zu erhöhen.
Hast du vor alle Verbindungen der RhB zu machen?
Jonaes (2026-05-16 07:48:07+00:00): Grundsätzlich ja, aber wir können uns das natürlich auch gerne aufteilen.
Ich würde dann erstmal noch den RE5 machen, und danach RE9/R19 (Bernina)
Piagno (2026-05-16 16:06:39+00:00): Das ist doch super, dann überlasse ich dir die RhB. Ich werde das centovalli noch machen und mich dann um die rund 200 Busrelationen kümmern die noch zu tun sind...
wa_wheatbelt (2026-05-17 16:14:42+00:00): Hi there. Thanks for fixing. Can you please explain what you mean by “superfluous oneway” so that I can do better next time? :)
TheSwavu (2026-05-17 23:05:11+00:00): It means you don't need to add a oneway=* to a way that is already tagged junction=roundabout (as that also means one way). See: https://taginfo.geofabrik.de/australia-oceania:australia/tags/junction=roundabout?filter=ways#combinations
StC (2026-07-21 09:57:51+00:00): Bonjour,

de quelle nature sont ces poteaux signalétiques par lesquels ne passe parfois aucun sentier ? C'est du balisage pour la rando à ski ?
Genépél (2026-07-21 10:07:16+00:00): Bonjour,

Ces poteaux indicateurs existent mais parfois il y a directement des pancartes fixées sur des rochers car en hiver beaucoup de casse au printemps. 

Pour l'hiver oui ok y a des jalons sur les parties skiables mais cela dépend si exercice militaire

Il y a des projets en cours de remise en état de pas mal de sentiers

Bonne journée, 

Genepel
NorthCrab_upload (2026-05-15 23:11:13+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/394612197

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
maaxy_ (2026-05-15 23:36:15+00:00): Dzieki, zaraz zmienie
keepright! ler (2026-06-09 13:19:44+00:00): Do you have any proof that the four sections of road you edited should be primary instead of secondary? It’s very inconsistent with other nearby roads!
AriAlvarez (2026-06-12 15:48:40+00:00): Yes I live in Deer Park and can confirm these are main roads that people use to get in and out of Deer Park
keepright! ler (2026-06-12 16:34:40+00:00): Okay, but the previous tagging with highway=secondary already highlights these roads as main roads, so your change doesn’t seem necessary at all.
AriAlvarez (2026-06-12 19:40:10+00:00): Why not? They are primary roads? How will navigation engines know to prioritize these roads once other mappers add more secondary roads in the area? I think it's 100% necessary to make sure the area stays updated. All small towns have a primary roads
Minh Nguyen (2026-06-20 14:43:07+00:00): I’m afraid there’s a misunderstanding as to the purpose of these highway classifications. Please consult https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States/2021_Highway_Classification_Guidance for the standard that we use in the U.S. As far as I can tell, there is no expectation that every small town have highway=primary. We also expect classifications to be contiguous without haphazard changes near intersections.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-06-21 11:02:04+00:00): "All small towns have a primary roads", no, absolutely not

many towns have no primary roads
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-06-21 11:02:52+00:00): or more specifically, highway=primary means something else than "the most important road in a given town"

see also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/some-random-stretches-of-highway-secondary-upgraded-to-primary/144757
AriAlvarez (2026-07-09 23:23:36+00:00): Thank you all for sorting this out
keepright! ler (2026-07-10 09:36:13+00:00): You’re welcome! Have a nice day, and God bless you!
StC (2026-07-20 23:10:57+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre qui passe par là (en plusieurs endroits, à moins que ce ne soit plusieurs changesets). Je m'occupe de la réparation.
aTarom (2026-05-16 14:30:28+00:00): Hola, paso el tag
"ref:consorcio"
a
"ref:CTMAM"
consultado en
https://t.me/OSMes/176959
Saludos
rochirochi (2026-05-16 16:09:09+00:00): Te lo agradezco
NorthCrab_upload (2026-05-16 00:32:41+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13568901034
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10045152914
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/309391060
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/687237009

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Glassman (2026-05-16 18:07:29+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. Does each camp site have a name or number that can be added?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182722157
SomeoneElse (2026-05-16 01:33:46+00:00): Burn
Glassman (2026-05-16 18:07:51+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182722384
SekeRob repair (2026-05-16 06:05:49+00:00): Hi Simon,
You put this building on top of road. Please move it or or realign road so it dies not cross any building. way 1514149343
There several more on nearby roads which need checking.

Happy mapping
NorthCrab_upload (2026-05-16 03:11:13+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/356046539

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
CRCulver (2026-05-18 18:14:31+00:00): Why did you add a highway=crossing tag here when I had expressly deleted it?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7683944841

Recent aerial imagery shows no marked crossing there, and unmarked crossings are widely regarded as deprecated. You do not need to add highway=crossing tags to every intersection of a sidewalk and a service road.
cobalt32 (2026-05-18 19:07:58+00:00): Thanks for bringing this to my attention. I don't typically map sidewalks and wasn't aware of this deprecation. I'll go through my changesets and remove the unmarked crossings.
nevw (2026-05-16 05:02:25+00:00): I reverted this changeset as it deleted Piggott Range Road.
osmviborg (2026-05-16 07:54:44+00:00): Giver det mening at tagge denne med lit=no? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1446233590? Det pynter selvfølgelig på statistikken.
Michael Thaw (2026-05-16 18:25:29+00:00): I wrongly, stupidly deleted administrative lines. Please help me revert it.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-15 09:52:42+00:00): Reverted adding SEO POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags, possibly sourced from Google Maps, in changeset 184128702

https://osm.org/changeset/184128702
Colbertson (2026-05-16 07:32:31+00:00): thanks for cathing that
Michael Thaw (2026-05-16 18:25:45+00:00): I wrongly, stupidly deleted administrative lines. Please help me revert it.
rarad74 (2026-05-16 05:21:18+00:00): Ba baietas. Harta asta nu este bataia ta de joc. Asta este un bun de uz public pentru navigatie de care depind mii de oameni. NU ai tu treaba sa iti favorizezi o mizeri de joc modificand harta! Nu se deseneaza cladiri peste cladiri ca nu se mai intelege nimic. E primul si ultimul avertisment. Iti vor fi sterse toate editerile care nu reprezinta realitatea din teren.
Michael Thaw (2026-05-16 18:25:58+00:00): I wrongly, stupidly deleted administrative lines. Please help me revert it.
Glassman (2026-05-16 18:08:05+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182725970
eggie (2026-05-16 06:41:56+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback K
Je info heb ik samengevoegd met de adresnodes.
Svp geen spaties in postcode.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Lol24 (2026-05-16 08:31:07+00:00): Dank!
nileshbarawkar (2026-05-20 04:47:48+00:00): Hi ramshi04
Thank you for your contribution to OSM. Could you please confirm whether construction is still ongoing at Mota Varachha, Surat, (w1514327802, w1215932813, w1514327808) Gujarat. Your input will be very helpful for the mapping community.
Michael Thaw (2026-05-16 18:26:14+00:00): I wrongly, stupidly deleted administrative lines. Please help me revert it.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-16 11:51:17+00:00): Reverted adding POI explicitly sourced from Google Maps, in changeset 184178018. See https://osm.wiki/Google

https://osm.org/changeset/184178018
Glassman (2026-05-16 18:08:26+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182726179
Michael Thaw (2026-05-16 18:26:30+00:00): I wrongly, stupidly deleted administrative lines. Please help me revert it.
cubbe8 (2026-05-16 17:38:28+00:00): https://gis.data.mass.gov/datasets/massgis::massgis-massdot-roads/explore?location=42.368114%2C-71.120377%2C12

Use this

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182753331
StreetSurveyor (2026-05-16 17:51:20+00:00): From the official functional classification website itself: “this layer shows both the state and federal classification of roadways (F_F).” 
https://gis.data.mass.gov/datasets/MassDOT::functional-classification

Additionally, the MassDOT Road Inventory Data Dictionary explicitly defines F_F as “Federal Functional Class.”
https://www.mass.gov/doc/road-inventory-data-dictionary/download
JJIglesias (2026-05-16 17:26:47+00:00): Por favor recordar Escuadrar las edificaciones apretando la letra Q o en el Mouse click derecho.

Las imágenes pueden distorsionar las edificaciones pero el 99% de ellas tienen ángulos a 90 grados y son simétricas y ortogonales. Las imágenes satélites son angulares NO verticales.

Por favor activa la opción ISSUES en el panel derecho de tu editor, para q te aparezcan tus errores, si los hubiera

Gracias
pocapulpa (2026-05-17 00:44:57+00:00): Gracias por tu comentario.

Tuve cuidado con letra Q, pero puede que haya habido algunas deficiencias.

Por favor, háganos saber si observa algo más.
rodolfovargas (2026-05-17 02:13:43+00:00): Hola.
El mapeo de edificios en La Paz es un nivel de alta complejidad. Recomiendo que aplique imágenes de DRON para mejorar la geometría, apoyado con trabajo de campo.
Comienza mejorando la geometría de calles y avenidas.
pocapulpa (2026-05-17 05:55:12+00:00): Gracias por tu comentario.

Tal como me aconsejaron, me abstendré de editar los edificios.
Glassman (2026-05-16 18:20:02+00:00): I changed the website tag to just the company that owns this location.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182726837
Glassman (2026-05-16 18:08:41+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182727003
Glassman (2026-05-16 18:08:57+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182727107
Glassman (2026-05-16 18:11:00+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182727231
Glassman (2026-05-16 18:11:58+00:00): Typically fire stations have a name of the district, county, city as well as a number. Can you recheck the name?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182727281
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-16 06:56:10+00:00): #Spam
BaboucheVerte (2026-06-04 17:50:16+00:00): comment fait-on pour entrer dans cette rue en voiture ?
Chouhartem (2026-06-04 18:19:11+00:00): Il y a la condtition “oneway:condition=no@destination” pour indiquer qu’elle est à sens unique sauf riverains. Pour l’instant à part les riverains elle n’est pas “utilisable” en voiture.
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-16 06:56:42+00:00): #Spam
marcmarti (2026-05-19 19:12:43+00:00): Segur que el nombre d'escalons és prou important com per ensenyar al mapa? 
;) Es pot posar com a etiqueta dins les escales mateixes. salut
Toni Serra (2026-05-19 19:48:55+00:00): Tenia pendent editar-ho correctament. Les edicions que faig sobre el terreny amb el mòbil no permeten editar correctament aquest petits detalls.
Bienson (2026-05-17 03:03:24+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182765196 - Adressduplikat an Gebäudeteil
Bienson (2026-05-17 03:03:21+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182765196 - Adressduplikat an Gebäudeteil
mavl (2026-05-17 06:57:15+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок добавляет непрямоугольные здания. Чтобы сделать здание прямоугольным достаточно выполнить команду "Сделать углы прямыми" в редакторе iD (которым вы пользовались).
TrickyFoxy (2026-07-06 15:12:24+00:00): Имеено эта водонапорная? Не какая-то рядом?
mavl (2026-05-17 07:09:55+00:00): Здравствуйте. Про номера домов можно почитать в статье  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Адреса#Нумерация_домов
Fizzie-DWG (2026-05-16 22:40:40+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20529
mueschel (2026-05-19 14:04:39+00:00): Bei diesen Wegweiserrelationen brauchst du route:symbol und ähnliches nicht wirklich eintragen. Zur Relation gehört ja bereits der "to" Weg der Teil der Routen-Relation ist die alle Infos beinhaltet.
Gabri81 (2026-05-16 16:47:10+00:00): Buongiorno Andrea, avevo modificato anche io ieri queste strade eliminando i blocchi. Purtroppo non so come eliminare le mie modifiche, ma avevo inserito la richiesta di approvazione da un supervisor: se possibile riesce ad eliminarle lei? Grazie mille e buona serata.
Andrea Musuruane (2026-05-16 17:33:58+00:00): Ciao. Non c'è bisogno di eliminare niente. Mancavano solo alcuni tratti di strada da cui non erano state tolte le restrizioni, come puoi vedere qui: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=182731017&relations=true Ciao, Andrea
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-16 09:18:04+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
Is the name real?
private (955694317), v2
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-24 07:13:19+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182999907
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-16 09:18:15+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
Is the name real?
private property (955694317), v3
fortera_au (2026-05-17 23:25:59+00:00): It also should be access=private. access=no means nobody can go there, even the people who live along that driveway.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182731815
aharvey (2026-05-22 01:17:01+00:00): I've fixed this now, setting access=private and ownership=private. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_use_name_tag_to_describe_things
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-24 07:13:03+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182999907

Thanks @aharvey
RailandSea (2026-05-30 02:20:23+00:00): this is yard industrial track part of NYA Fresh Pond Yard no longer a branch line.
tuxayo (2026-05-17 00:05:26+00:00): Bonjour, il y a eu une grosse erreur de manip:

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=182732597

https://osmcha.org/changesets/182732597
tuxayo (2026-05-17 00:46:52+00:00): Asked for help in the forum to have it rollbacked: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/need-revert-of-a-changeset-that-dragged-thousands-of-nodes/143886
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-05-17 01:08:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 182764012 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problems with node drag in France - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182732597
Lieckio (2026-05-16 10:24:56+00:00): I wonder if the relations work now...? JOSM UI is such a mess that I am not sure if the relations for the two buildings with courtyards are done correctly.
Sakari_N (2026-05-16 19:29:24+00:00): I think they look good. Only thing that you could remove tags from the outer (or inner) way, like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/93480499 and move them to the relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1358715

I'm pretty sure it works that way on relation buildings, same way as with other relations.
Lieckio (2026-05-16 22:02:43+00:00): Ah, that's an oversight on my part, I must have forgotten to move them after merging with the existing relation.

Made a quick fix for them.
Sakari_N (2026-05-20 13:13:32+00:00): Now it's perfect! This is very good work, and allows for example the addresses to be tagged accurately. Thanks!
Lieckio (2026-05-21 10:22:06+00:00): Well, don't know about perfect, but I feel it's at least better than before. Quite a few of these buildings have multiple addresses, so I tried to figure out a method to do them neatly. In the future it might require a more detaield aproach if someone is interested...
qgmzmy (2026-05-16 13:08:37+00:00): 带空中连廊的四栋楼形状好像不太对，然后有些楼似乎其实是公寓？需要再线下考察一下
HaraldBk (2026-06-26 14:13:35+00:00): Please write a comment on my change sets when I make mistakes. I never would have seen this if hadn't revisited the street for further changes.
user_5359 (2026-05-17 09:54:08+00:00): Hello! What is the mean of the tag BTYPE = Komplementbyggnad? See
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2pWW
SWEdebe (2026-05-17 16:44:34+00:00): I'm impressed by how quickly you found that mistake. It was a categorization I tried when I was working locally. But I didn't get the benefit of it as I had intended and then I forgot to remove it when I checked in. I've fixed the mistake now. Thanks for the help.
Fizzie-DWG (2026-06-20 05:52:27+00:00): Reverted by 184340193