piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2026-04-08 16:06:46+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/2201193033 v7

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "veterinary clinic"
---
Na przykład, bardziej neutralna i obiektywna wersja Twojego tekstu mogłaby brzmieć: "klinika weterynaryjna"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-04-16 16:33:16+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/181062119
Taya_S (2026-04-08 16:08:35+00:00): Please see: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20113
Taya_S (2026-04-08 16:11:15+00:00): Reverted in: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181058186
Taya_S (2026-04-08 16:12:55+00:00): The following changesets have been reverted: 181057967, 181057935, 181057917, 181057892, 181057855, 181057824, 181057796, 181057756, 181057720, 181057685, 181057644, 181057607, 181057579, 181057544, 181057521, 181057502, 181057472, 181057447, 181057430, 181057399, 181057380, 181057349, 181057313, 181057286, 181057245, 181057218, 181057184, 181057148, 181057110, 181057084, 181057050, 181057027, 181056998, 181056940, 181056896, 181056862, 181056829, 181056789, 181056753, 181056722, 181056690, 181056651, 181056628, 181056598, 181056568, 181056519, 181056475, 181056440, 181056397, 181056337, 181056324, 181056285, 181056247, 181056204, 181056158, 181056116, 181056056, 181056022, 181056013, 181055985, 181055980, 181055949, 181055946, 181055923, 181055914, 181055877, 181055869, 181055847, 181055843, 181055811, 181055803, 181055767, 181055758, 181055735, 181055725, 181055707, 181055698, 181055679, 181055669, 181055659, 181055635, 181055617, 181055608, 181055566, 181055553, 181055537, 181055503, 181055479, 181055452, 181055434, 181055414, 181055398, 181055377, 181055361, 181055337, 181055294, 181055254, 181055221, 181055161, 181055130, 181055108, 181055086, 181055060, 181055030, 181054999, 181054964, 181054927, 181054888, 181054848, 181054755, 181054516, 181054432, 181054258, 181054238, 181054182, 181054143, 181054125, 181054085, 181054060, 181054024, 181053608, 181046492, 180913227
NeisBot (2026-04-08 16:15:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 29 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/568356675 v16 | 5 crossings
https://osm.org/way/354380968 v3 | 5 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1224649753 v3 | 4 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/11357224973 v2
https://osm.org/node/3601148354 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=181058281
iandees (2026-04-08 17:54:26+00:00): Hello! I noticed that nodes https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11357224973, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3601262762 were moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181063141, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
Wildsharky (2026-04-13 11:55:54+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:181086434
literan (2026-04-08 19:06:50+00:00): но почему commercial, если это жилые дома
Fedorrr (2026-04-09 16:16:09+00:00): на сайте наш.дом.рф они отмечены как "Нежилой объект⁠"
literan (2026-04-09 18:44:17+00:00): зато на своем сайте вовсю продают "резиденции".
NieWnen (2026-04-08 20:14:22+00:00): Dzięki za zmiany w POI.
Drobna uwaga: jak się lokal zamyka to warto nie usuwać punktu tylko dać np. disused:shop=<poprzednia wartość> albo shop=vacant.

Wtedy zostawiamy historię punktu i wiadomo, że w tym miejscu może coś powstać nowego.
pant82 (2026-04-08 20:36:26+00:00): Kurcze, lipka wyszła. Miałem zmienić to na coś innego, co teraz jest, zamiast usuwać. Będę bardziej ostrożny :)
NieWnen (2026-04-08 20:42:36+00:00): Nie no, jest  dobrze. To taka drobnostka na przyszłość.

Fajnie, że aktualizujesz usługi/restauracje – ogólnie POI. Bo tu potrzebna jest właśnie wiedza lokalna i mało kto to robi.

W razie pytań śmiało pisz.
kubahahaha (2026-04-11 21:13:23+00:00): Czemu chciałbyś to dyskutować? Na czas remontu DW527 nie ma po co trzymać tak wysokiej kategorii
AndyB_66 (2026-04-12 07:38:17+00:00): Ponieważ wprowadzanie zmian o dość szerokim zakresie, w dużej liczbie i w sposób pochopny łatwo może spowodować, że - w sytuacji, gdy ich autor o nich zapomni, straci zainteresowanie mapowaniem, dostanie bana itp. - zostaniemy z niepotrzebnie zdegradowaną do niższej kategorii siatką dróg. Dlatego uważam, że potrzebny jest tracking tego typu zmian - choćby poprzez ślad w dyskusji na forum (dedykowany wątek?), ew. notatki, znaczniki "note" lub "description". Nie jestem przeciwny samej zmianie (i innym tego usera w analogicznych przypadkach), tylko trybowi ich wprowadzenia.
mavl (2026-04-09 16:55:36+00:00): Здравствуйте. Эти четыре округа не городские округа, а муниципальные образования со статусом городского округа. Всё было обозначено правильно до вашего пакета правок.  
  
Например, закон Тюменской области от 05 ноября 2004 года № 263.  
  
Статья 23. Муниципальное образование город Ишим  
  
1. Наделить муниципальное образование город Ишим статусом городского округа.   
   
Статья 24. Муниципальное образование город Тобольск  
  
1. Наделить муниципальное образование город Тобольск статусом городского округа.  
  
Про остальные муниципальные образования пишут примерно также.  
  
Если следовать закону, то этот пакет правок нужно отменять.
Noro Hibu (2026-04-09 17:08:29+00:00): Это стандартная формулировка почти во всех законах по стране. Плюс загляните в ОКТМО и там всё стандартизировано. Все субъекты муниципального устройства являются муниципальными образованиями. Вы просто слишком буквально следуете формулировкам, хотя Тюменская область ничем не выделяется в плане муниципального устройства от других субъектов РФ.
mavl (2026-04-09 17:27:48+00:00): На то он и закон, чтобы следовать ему слишком буквально. Иначе получается, что часть названий МО взята из закона (например, Тюменский муниципальный округ), а часть просто придумана (например, городской округ Тюмень).
Noro Hibu (2026-04-09 17:41:04+00:00): Лучше продолжать эту дискуссию на форуме дабы другие участники подключились.
iandees (2026-04-08 17:54:32+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8872977565 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181063145, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
TainanLai (2026-04-08 16:55:35+00:00): 編輯衝突!!我的編輯被擋了 哭
Kagami (2026-04-09 05:38:57+00:00): 抱歉啦XD
TainanLai (2026-04-09 05:51:16+00:00): 沒事沒事 抓到衝突點移除就有成功送出編輯了~~
Ltrlg (2026-04-17 11:12:28+00:00): J’étais en train de me préparer à dire que la parenthèse dans le nom me semble superflue (plus une indication supplémentaire qu’une partie du nom), mais en regardant https://www.angers.fr/vivre-a-angers/marches/index.html je me demande d’où vient le nom, car cette page indique « Grand marché ». Est-ce ce qui est indiqué sur le panneau sur place ?

(Accessoirement, le point sur la carte y est plutôt sur la place piétonne que sur le parking, ce qui me semble plus logique ?)
Sébastien Chopin (2026-04-18 15:53:14+00:00): Oui, tu as raison. Je suis en train de répertorier tous les marchés angevins. Je me base comme tu le vois sur la page https://www.angers.fr/vivre-a-angers/marches/index.html mais aussi sur la page 7 du «Vivre à Angers» de novembre 2025 :
https://recherche-archives.angers.fr/functions/ead/detached/PER/212PER/pdf/FRAC049007_212PER_VAA474_N150.pdf
Ce qui serait possible, c’est d’ajouter «Grand marché» en nom alternatif, court ou local.
Ltrlg (2026-04-18 20:14:06+00:00): Les éléments de la liste du « Vivre à Angers » ressemblent plus à des localisations qu’à des noms, je ne les utiliserais pas pour référence sur les name=*. Il me semble donc qu’en l’absence d’autre source c’est bien « Grand marché » qui soit le plus pertinent ici
fayor (2026-04-09 14:27:44+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181101014#map=17/37.138628/14.389428&layers=N
squeaker_andrus (2026-04-10 07:19:04+00:00): Hi, fayor! Thank you for your comment and the correction you made. I apologize for any inconvenience caused by the use of the outdated satellite imagery. Have a good day and with best regards, squeaker_andrus
Badojo (2026-04-08 16:49:17+00:00): Pozdrav, neke adrese imaju upitnike upisane najvjerojatnije umijesto slova. I u Dubici je isto tako upisano
Savo25656 (2026-04-08 16:53:21+00:00): Vidim, tek treba da sredim ulicu po ulicu, ima tu još dosta posla
DaveF (2026-07-19 20:42:14+00:00): Do not delete valid, current, authenticated PROWs
squeaker_andrus (2026-07-21 08:53:40+00:00): Hello DaveF,

I removed this path because I couldn't confirm it on satellite imagery, and it seemed to cross directly through existing building and a golf course.

If you have reliable local sources showing this route is active, would you mind updating the geometry and access tags so they match reality on the ground?

Have a great day and happy mapping!

squeaker_andrus
DaveF (2026-07-21 11:35:53+00:00): Zoom in on Box73 
https://experience.arcgis.com/experience/cae051befa5649fbb318c836afe901c1/page/Page

There's more to mapping OSM than (often out of date) aerial imagery. On ground surveys take priority.

When I last walk past this sign was still there.
https://maps.app.goo.gl/KfU2NUw9LnrwWuFa7

If you're unsure about something you can add a 'fixme' tag to the object, add a note to the webpage map, or ask on one of the many forums.

I've already done it for you, but for future  reference, OSM has a 'correct your own mistakes' policy. There are a few changeset reversion tools available,
squeaker_andrus (2026-07-23 15:32:51+00:00): Thank you for sharing the resources and tips! I will definitely use them in the future to verify these types of objects.

However, there is still an issue on the map: this path intersects with a building. I will leave a note on the map so that a local mapper can resolve this data conflict based on their on-the-ground knowledge.

Thanks again for your help and for making the correction!
NeisBot (2026-04-08 16:54:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13716727741 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Property management office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisAgent (2026-04-08 22:33:25+00:00): 🕵 The changeset tags appear to reference Google as a data source.

Please note that using Google Maps, Google Street View, or similar Google services as a mapping source is not allowed in OpenStreetMap due to license restrictions.

More information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google

If the data in this changeset was derived from Google or another incompatible source, the edits may need to be reverted.

If this is a misunderstanding and the data was collected from permitted sources (e.g. local survey, Bing imagery, local knowledge, etc.), please clarify in a reply.
Frans S (2026-04-09 08:25:34+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181060763
HellMap (2026-04-09 13:19:58+00:00): Hello,

This edit broke the geometry of the building, deleted the original way, deleted the tags, deleted all the building parts and misaligned the new shape. I have reverted this edit. Please edit more carefully and only adjust things you are confident are correct and follow correct OSM tagging and geometry for 3D building tagging.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-16 11:06:18+00:00): Reverted adding SEO POI with malformed tags sourced from Google Maps, in changeset 184176179

https://osm.org/changeset/184176179
felipeeugenio (2026-04-08 18:58:49+00:00): Equidistados y alineados
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181061055
iandees (2026-04-08 17:54:38+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11253874118 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181063150, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
truemarmalade (2026-04-08 22:39:48+00:00): Thank you for catching this! I’ve been doing updates with the mobile app while I am on bicycle tour and you are correct it is difficult to select specific things. I’ll do my best to be more diligent in the future.
iandees (2026-04-08 22:49:06+00:00): No problem! Thanks for mapping from the field.
iandees (2026-04-08 17:54:56+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12496285636 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181063160, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
josmougn (2026-04-08 18:11:48+00:00): Do you have reverted the complete changeset or only the point moved far away ?

You've been too fast fast to make this correction, it was a temporary save in GoMap!! before adjusting in JOSM.

It happens when I use GoMap!! on my phone, sometines my finger on the screen catches too many things without notice.
Thanks for the correction.
iandees (2026-04-08 19:32:23+00:00): I only moved the one node that was dragged.
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:00:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
NeisBot (2026-04-08 17:27:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13653007226 v5

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Art gallery"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisAgent (2026-04-08 22:33:17+00:00): 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again?
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-01 13:47:21+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags/values

https://osm.org/changeset/184915374
Lokai (2026-04-08 17:40:08+00:00): Hallo,

der CS wurde von mir zurück gesetzt. Da der Weg noch zumindest in Teilen sichtbar ist, doch aufgegeben, kann der von anderen mappern wieder eingezeichnet werden.
Jetzt wird der Weg nicht mehr gerendert, bleibt aber als aufgegeben markiert in der Datenbank.

Gruß
L.
Arturo Francisco Barbero (2026-04-10 11:05:43+00:00): Hola BigRedPie,

¿Podrías añadir también el nombre del bazar?

Si no lo conoces, es mejor retirar nombres genéricos como name=Bazar, ese campo es sólo para nombres propios, con el etiquetado shop=variety_store el mapa ya conoce que tipo de negocio es y actualmente salta como error. Si necesitas especificar algo más que no es posible con otros campos, puedes usar el de descripción.

Un saludo y gracias por animarte a colaborar mapeando.
Atentamente,
Arturo.
BigRedPie (2026-04-11 13:56:48+00:00): Hola, tienes toda la razón. El bazar no tiene nombre alguno. Se lo acabo de borrar. Buen finde!
Kamil Kalata (2026-04-11 09:26:48+00:00): Witaj!
Skąd wynika poprawa tego kawałka ulicy Górnośląskiej na highway=secondary, skoro są dwie równoległe trasy tak oznaczone: Aleja Wojska Polskiego i Szlak Bursztynowy? Mimo wszystko, zmiana ta jako taka jest technicznie zła, gdyż ten kawałek highway=secondary jest niepołączony z żadną drogą takiej samej lub wyższej kategorii.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-04-15 04:53:27+00:00): zmiany klasy istotnych dróg bez dyskusji - wiec wycofuję
eggie (2026-04-08 18:00:00+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
NeisBot (2026-04-08 17:48:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/11135802517 v5

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Clothing store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-16 22:33:04+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181433898
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
goedegazelle (2026-04-09 08:39:01+00:00): En wat is er mis met landuse=scrub?

O, niet afgesproken.

Hoeveel mensen maken zulke afspraken?

En hoeveel mensen werken er aan de kaart?

Dus hoeveel zwaarder weegt dat laatste?
marczoutendijk (2026-04-09 08:51:12+00:00): landuse=scrub komt 768 keer voor.
natural=scrub komt 5433670 keer voor.
Dat was de stand op 2-4-2026.
Ik probeer zoveel mogelijk type/tagfouten te verwijderen en te vervangen door de juiste tags die goed worden gerenderd en begrepen.
scrub is geen landuse maar een natuurlijke vorm van vegetatie die als natuurlijk wordt beschouwd. Vandaar mijn keuze (en niet alleen van mij) voor natural=scrub.
goedegazelle (2026-04-13 12:40:33+00:00): De tag wordt onder andere gebruikt voor gronden die door de gemeente zijn beplant en worden onderhouden. De planten die er staan zijn gekweekt en vaak van een gekruist ras.

In de wiki staat overduidelijk dat automatische edits ten strengste worden afgeraden. Beetje lullig om dat aan een doorgewinterde mapper te moeten uitleggen.

Dat de ene tag vaker voorkomt dan de andere is geen verrassing aangezien één van de twee systematisch wordt omgezet in de ander. Dat bovenop het feit dat een kleine maar hardnekkige groep naar hartelust wiki's voorziet van hun eigen tags, aan editors voorkeuzes meegeven en alles en iedereen bestrijden die het er niet mee eens is.
marczoutendijk (2026-04-13 14:33:47+00:00): Het waren geen automatische edits, ik heb ze een voor een bekijken en wijzigingen doorgevoerd indien dat uit het oogpunt van de gebruikte tags nodig was. (en daar ben ik nog steeds mee bezig).
En gronden die door gemeenten worden beplant (en onderhouden) kun je onmogelijk als "natuurlijk" beschouwen.
De wiki geeft onder landuse duidelijk een aantal voorbeelden van wat wel zou kunnen, en je kunt altijd zelf nog iets verzinnen dat wel goed weergeeft wat er op die plekken moet komen. Maar landuse=scrub gebruiken voor wilde/ruige "natuur" terwijl we daar natural=scrub voor hebben, gaat mij te ver.
marczoutendijk (2026-04-13 14:45:06+00:00): Een voorbeeld van de controle die ik uitvoer bij het wijzigen van landuse=scrub naar natural=scrub zie je in deze changeset:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/802665984#map=5/59.92/17.63
Het vervangen van landuse door natural zou een conflict geven met natural=wood. 
Dat heb ik dus gewoon laten staan. Afgezien van het feit dat de combinatie van wood en scrub natuurlijk volkomen onzinnig is!
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-09 05:23:43+00:00): Hallo lsfr, willkommen bei OSM.

Es scheint, als wäre hier mehrere doppelte Ways (Geometrien) erzeugt worden. Ein Beispiel:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1497736656
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1497736657

Viele Grüße
lsfr (2026-04-09 14:47:54+00:00): Hi! 

my bad, Korrigiert in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181101766

Gruß
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-09 16:03:31+00:00): Danke 👍
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:12:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:10:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
InsertUser (2026-04-28 08:56:52+00:00): If you're going to cite OSM conventions you might want to consult https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
Pradip Subedi (2026-05-01 13:00:59+00:00): Mapping quality needs improvement. Buildings are consistently misaligned with imagery, and many are missing proper tags like building=yes. Similar issues are repeated across tasks, please follow guidelines more carefully.
Andrea Musuruane (2026-04-09 10:20:07+00:00): Ciao. Secondo la mappa pubblicata sul Biellese del 11/11/25 Via Biella è a senso unico solo fino alla prima intersezione dopo il civico 6. Qual è la versione corretta? Grazie, Andrea
蕉饼电脑 (2026-04-09 05:48:53+00:00): This is not a building.
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:11:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports