piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
acauema (2024-11-18 14:27:07+00:00): yes, i use the map display for search results much more than the list.

i now see the wiki, and "If something really doesn't have a name, don't add a name to OpenStreetMap. Any additional information should be included in separate tags (see, e.g., aforementioned links) to identify its meaning." ain't so clear in case of stations...

all stations have names in their respective apps. sometimes the name coincides with the street address, other times they name them with more meaningful way to identify the station. just because they are technical names don't make them less important.

and more importantly...

while osm don't really have a standard way to qualify charging stations, why not at least use the name to add relevant data? knowing if a charging station belongs to lidl, greenway, or have some peculiar characteristic such as charging speed, etc makes a big difference.

i understand now names should not be used for that, but who will use charging station info on a osm map will most likely do it using organic maps and other apps that still don't follow any standard way to add and use information, like myself.

if they really should never get names on osm, perhaps still you could be so kind to double check if this is indeed the case and open an issue on om (as i do not use github). i could also add a comment to telegram group. and just use the comment instead...

still it will make it more complicated for me, because thee data will not be immediately available for me, and so i have to rely solely on my bookmarks, and hope i don't lose them, plus it will not really be shared until all this gets sorted out by the "entire community" properly.
Marek-M (2024-11-18 15:27:11+00:00): It is not said that no charging station can have a name. Maybe some new company will start naming their chargers, nameplates will appear, then such chargers in OSM will have names. Names in OSM can appear when it is verifiable in the field or when someone local considers that a given name is commonly used in the local community.

As long as there are no such chargers with names, the names in OSM will be deleted or moved to other tags - e.g. `description`. These are the rules here. If other applications have their own data, they can use it in their own invented way and the OSM community has no influence on this.

As you have probably read on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station, various tags are set in OSM to more precisely describe the capabilities of individual chargers. The fact that the charger is located on the premises of, for example, Lidl may describe an additional tag `operator=Lidl`

Unfortunately, there is no way around the fact that the rules for mapping in OSM are complicated, especially for beginner editors. OSM maps are like any new program that you have to learn to use. Not everyone is immediately fluent in Word or Excel, but with practice you gain some skill.

I hope you will not be discouraged from adding new data to the OSM map. It is not really difficult and these few simple rules will certainly be at your fingertips after a few edits.

Your information added to the map is available almost immediately, only 'OrganicMaps' updates the map data probably only once a month.
acauema (2024-11-18 15:42:39+00:00): i will be very okay with people renaming them and moving around to right tags and all this. not ideal, but at least works for me, and raise more awareness of work needed there, in the osm community and elsewhere, than using notes.

and i do not want to use computers or big screens. i really just use them for now for work and money needs. so, no, osm maps on mobile are nothing like any usual software.

using ai and/or improving the ux in general can "make the rules extremely simple". it will come with time. look at how ubuntu itself evolved.

thanks for all your support!

will you also take care of this node?
Marek-M (2024-11-18 18:36:00+00:00): I don't know how OSM will develop in connection with AI, but for now I'm struggling with it normally - manually.

I'm not encouraging or convincing you to use other tools than you need now, but you have to understand that mobile applications usually have fewer capabilities than tools available for PCs. Regardless of these limitations, the rules in OSM are the same for all editors.

I've corrected the charging stations to which you added descriptive names. If you included any data about the station in the name, I tried to enter it into OSM according to the rules written in WIKI. I moved the remaining data to the `description` tag or removed it if it seemed insignificant.

I've supplemented the station from this edition with data available on the Lidl Polska website.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12330757701
Fraxi (2024-11-11 12:06:55+00:00): Used Mapillary, too.
user_1566574 (2024-11-16 09:09:16+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7027388809/history

What?
rempshaener (2024-11-11 16:48:35+00:00): Hallo,

du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Anpassung gebeten.
Ich sehe hier drei Probleme:
-	Landuses haben in der Regel keinen Namen
-	Das Gebiet ist bereits als Wohngebiet erfasst, siehe www.openstreetmap.org/way/313527219
-	Flächen sollten nicht mit Straßen verklebt werden, hier mit der Eikelmannstraße
Also am besten wieder löschen, ist ja schnell gemacht. Vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag, bitte melde dich, wenn du Fragen hast.

Viele Grüße
bxl-forever (2024-11-11 13:31:54+00:00): Why did you want to create a non-matching name here?

I mean, name:fr and name:nl no longer match the name tag. The way you wrote the main name tag makes it impossible to split cleanly.  Can you please explain or at least provide the correct link you used instead of just "Mapillary 2024".  Thanks.
ValidDistress (2024-11-11 14:21:09+00:00): Thanks! I fixed the nl and fr name tags.
I believe "TotalEnergies" would be the main name and "Usines - Werkhuizen" the additional branch name.
Like for "Colruyt Schaerbeek" you would not only add "Schaerbeek" as the name tag without "Colruyt".
ValidDistress (2024-11-11 14:21:54+00:00): For the Mapillary, for example: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=903944274035545&focus=photo
bxl-forever (2024-11-11 14:44:45+00:00): I agree that the brand could be part of the name but this is not my point here; the problem is that in multilingual territories, the "name" tag must be an exact concatenation of "name:fr" and "name:nl" with the multilingual separator between them " - ".
i understand that as a new user you are not really familiar with how multilingual names work.  I’ll fix it, don’t bother.
HugoC01 (2024-11-11 12:34:42+00:00): Je n'ai pas cette modification
fgouget (2025-02-14 00:37:21+00:00): Bonjour,

Ce changeset ajoute lit=24/7 sur plusieurs rues notamment la rue Anatole France. Par exemple :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25736273
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/160153622

Êtes-vous sûr que ces rues sont éclairées toute la journée ?

Cordialement,
Sakari_N (2025-05-12 06:24:11+00:00): Moi,

Mistä olet saanut tännä "Djupskär Sauna & Laava" -nimisen leirintäalueen? Huomasin tämän koska tästä on tullut map note että alue on yksityinen mökki eikä leirintäalue. Internetistä ei löydy mitään tietoa (paitsi yksi OSM-dataa hyödyntävä palvelu) tuolla nimellä.
liljaadeliina (2025-05-12 09:12:57+00:00): Moi,

en muista ja koitin itsekin selvitellä asiaa, mutta en löytänyt mitään tietoa. Poistin alueen kuitenkin kartalta ja ratkaisin mapnoten.
mueschel (2024-11-12 09:28:35+00:00): Hallo,
hier ist etwas schiefgegangen. All diese Wege haben ausschließlich fremde Tags die nicht in OSM sein sollten. Können diese Wege einfach wieder gelöscht werden?
reigi (2024-11-13 13:27:32+00:00): Hallo Mueschel, danke für den Hinweis. Ich schließe natürlich nicht aus, dass mir bei der Bearbeitung einer so langen Relation der ein oder andere Fehler unterlaufen ist, die ich selbstverständlich behebe. Bei einer groben Durchsicht sind mir aber keine Fehler aufgefallen. Kannst du mich bitte mal mit der Nase darauf stoßen. Vielen Dank.
mueschel (2024-11-13 18:31:37+00:00): Ich meine alle 64 Wege die in diesem Changeset hochgeladen worden sind.
user_5359 (2024-11-14 08:01:12+00:00): Hallo! Z.B. siehe Weg http://www.osm.org/way/1332851632
BEGINN = 2019-08-15T08:01:17Z
KAT = 1010
LAND = NW
MODELLART = TFIS
NAM = Europäischer Fernwanderweg E8
OBJART = TF91101
OBJART_TXT = TF_Wanderweg
OBJID = DENWAT511T0005kd
OID = DENWAT511T000p3X_DENWAT511T000ZUT
SCL = 0550000089590000010057
SNR = 9050000050010057
WGV = Aachen - Heimbach ….
reigi (2024-11-14 08:27:10+00:00): Danke für eure Hinweise. Das sind Daten, die aus TFIS NRW (Touristik- und Freizeit-Informationssystem des Landes NRW) stammen. Wie die da reingeraten sind, ist mir (noch) ein Rätsel. Da werde ich mich kurzfristig drum kümmern.
Davileci (2025-03-25 00:30:51+00:00): Dear Pieter,
The link https://github.com/pietervdvn/MapComplete/issues/2189 is dead. On the other hand, Imgur links are still working. Why do not you leave them to stay on the current objects? I find them easier to open.
Regards,
David
Pieter Vander Vennet (2025-03-25 00:35:06+00:00): We moved to another source repository (but that one is currently offline as well). The issue should be available again in a few days at https://source.mapcomplete.org/MapComplete/MapComplete/issues/2189

Also see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/usage-of-imgur-hosted-images/118806
NorthCrab_upload (2024-11-11 12:51:08+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12330795423
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/198044589

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
ilias_ (2024-11-11 13:47:56+00:00): The hotel you added already exists - on the other side of the road. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1329922734
ToniE (2024-11-11 13:34:53+00:00): Na? Wohl eher Sankt-Bonifatius-Straße
eggie (2024-11-11 13:17:21+00:00): Dag Roel Die adresnodes op die gesloopte gebouwen kunnen vast ook wel weg. 
MVG
eggie
NorthCrab_upload (2024-11-11 13:11:05+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3576909100
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1332857233

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
welzheimerwald (2025-05-30 20:42:51+00:00): Hallo LorchNess,

wann wurde denn der Wohnplatz Götzenmühle von der Stadt Lorch in "LorchNess" umbenannt? Meines Wissens ist Götzenmühle Stand heute immernoch der gültige Lageschlüssel dieser Siedlung. Und da das Impressum von lorchness.de ebenfalls die Adresse mit "Götzenmühle 3" ausweist, gehe ich stark von einem Irrtum dieser Eintragung aus! 

WIchtig: Der Key "addr:place" muss stets einem gleichlautenden "place=*"-Objekt zugeordnet sein, weil die Nominatim-Suche sonst die Adressen nicht zuordnen kann (siehe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:addr:place).

Ein letzter Hinweis noch: Bitte keine deskriptiven Texte in das Feld "name=*" eintragen - Dieses ist für den Eigennamen des Objektes gedacht, sofern vorhanden, ansonsten bleibt er leer. Für Beschreibungen gibt es das Feld "description=*".

Und "insel_mit_einem_riesigen_feuersalamander" ist kein gültiges Attribut für "wetland=*"! ;-)
dval (2024-11-12 03:10:31+00:00): До вас беговую дорожку рисовал другой человек, Anthony_Meer. Вы его вклад удалили полностью, хотя вполне можно было просто отредактировать его линию, добавив свое.
Gh0stz0x (2024-11-13 23:53:03+00:00): Il numero civico non va messo sul poligono dell' edificio, ma su un nodo sull' entrata della proprietà.
Di solito sul cancello d'entrata o sulla porta dove è posizionata la targa del civico.
Di solito non si aggiunge la città e la via che si desume da dove è posizionata la casa.

Per altre info chiedi in ML e segui il Wiki di OpenStreetMap che spiega bene come fare.
Grazie
Dimitar155 (2024-11-11 20:13:12+00:00): Please don't delete closed shops. It is very likely that it wasn't bulldozed. Instead you can tag it as shop=yes so it can be resurveyed.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159024623
Evgeniya_rocketdata (2024-11-12 06:19:48+00:00): Hello!
yes, you are right! Let's make it a rule to do this.
eggie (2024-11-11 14:31:22+00:00): Dag Jonas...   outdoor_seating is een terras bij een horicagelegenheid. Wat heeft dat met een parkeerplaats te maken?

MVG
eggie
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-11-14 23:37:13+00:00): Why was the road tagged as a river?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159008676
arte2002 (2024-11-11 20:53:31+00:00): Hola lukant
Hay que tener en cuenta que la etiqueta access=no quiere decir que no se puede pasar por ningún medio, ni siquiera andando, entonces es mejor no ponerla y poner solo las etiquetas concretas de cada prohibición
lukant (2024-11-24 16:43:11+00:00): Gracias!
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2024-11-11 19:04:31+00:00): Hi, about climbing adventure,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1332867876

The name looks like a classification name of what should be in the tags. If you really need to emphasize that it's a low climbing adventure without safety harness, we could invent a new tag.

And maybe it's better to tag it as a pitch, not a sports_centre
waterproof_19m (2024-11-13 13:09:33+00:00): Tere,

Aitäh kaasa mõtlemast.
Muutsin selle madalseiklusraja spordiväljakuks.
Kuna selliseid seikluradu on tekkinud viimastel aastatel palju, oleks hea kui otsing annaks eestikeelse vastse.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2024-11-14 17:11:43+00:00): It's up to the search to support Estonian language and name it correctly, but maybe you can cheat the system, add Hageri in front and say that everyone calls it that. I wouldn't be a big fan of such solution, but it's also hard to say something against it.
bxl-forever (2024-11-11 14:50:34+00:00): Hello,

I checked your edit and it is a bit strange.

On this picture, we can clearly see that, if the road is made of asphalt, the former bus platform is made of concrete, and the sidewalk is made of setts.
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=447554067142648

I see that you tagged the former bus platform as "asphalt".  Was this a mistake?
_annne_ (2024-11-11 23:32:52+00:00): Hi, sure, change it. It wasn't clear to me which part of the road this referred to. However, if someone has these details, why was that even an open question on 'Street Complete'?
bxl-forever (2024-11-12 01:02:48+00:00): To answer your last question, SC has separate quests for roads and paths, and my (English-speaking) device says this: "What’s the surface here? Foot path".
Don’t bother, I’ll fix it.
Christian_von_Gielsdorf (2024-11-11 13:51:59+00:00): Irrtümlich den Namen vergeben, da Ortsgrenze mit Weg verwechselt. Bitte Änderung ignorieren
mcliquid (2024-11-11 14:43:24+00:00): Hi and thank you for your contribution!

Please note for the future: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
eggie (2024-11-11 14:33:53+00:00): Dag Renee   oneway=no hoef je niet op reguliere wegen te taggen.
Al meer opgemerkt. 
Over wat voor soort conflicten heb je het?

MVG
eggie
ManuelB701 (2025-11-12 15:47:04+00:00): Gibt es einen Grund, warum du das Geschäft nicht gelöscht oder zumindest als "disused=amenity=restaurant" mit den anderen Daten entfernt gekennzeichnet hast?
streetEdit (2025-11-17 14:01:33+00:00): Hallo @ManuelB701.
Danke für den edit; ich kenne mich leider nicht so gut aus mit Details zum solcher Änderung. wollte der community aber die Schließung markieren.
Danke
osmmichl (2024-11-11 20:24:44+00:00): Hello signorz, 

are you sure about this correction? (For the other correction I agree). 

This aerial images shows the deleted street - including a white car in the shadow: 
Bing, captured 11.-18.07.2023 

Here a decision concerning the street is not possible: 
Esri Clarity, captured 12.10.2023
It is a non-vertical view. The north border of the building is not visible till down to the ground. At least at the north east edge of the building a small stripe of breadth and a short section of street's length is visible.
signorz (2024-11-12 11:33:05+00:00): Hi Osmmichi,

Thanks for your mapping! Yes, I’m sure. I visit the place three times a year. What seems to be a track is blocked by a wall between two buildings. I will probably add the part that is still an internal way, which is a gravel road that serves the monastery enclosure, as soon as possible. It's ,my first "comment" I hope is correct.
literan (2024-11-11 17:28:50+00:00): неверный тег употребляете для указания этажности домов. Надо применять не levels, а https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:levels
Mazda05 (2024-11-12 19:58:23+00:00): ніяких помилок немає: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access; розпорядження Кабінету Міністрів України 18.02.2015 №106-р "Про закриття пунктів пропуску через державний кордон"
NeisBot (2024-11-11 15:18:40+00:00): Hi MatíasMaringuer, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 95% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 44 highway(s)
- 6 building(s)
- 7 landuse(')

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=159013471
mavl (2024-11-11 15:30:02+00:00): @MatíasMaringuer  
Hello. You deleted the valid data. This changeset is reverted. Please, don't delete without reason.
felipeeugenio (2024-11-11 17:20:38+00:00): thanks for reverting this. Pure vandalism.

regards
yasslay (2024-11-12 13:28:48+00:00): the test track built to motorway standard is not a motorway in of itself. See the M96 at the Fire Service College as another example.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159050374
yasslay (2024-11-12 13:32:34+00:00): Sorry for the chopped off comment above. I have reverted the changes you've made to the map in this changeset for the reasons outlined above ─ this is against community consensus in the UK. If you have any more questions, feel free to ask! You can always start a discussion at the OSM Community Forum if you feel that a review of the community consensus should change.
Puckle (2024-11-13 23:38:54+00:00): No worries, sorry for the trouble. will keep that in mind for next time as I couldn't find anything else thru the wiki that said otherwise.
yasslay (2024-11-14 11:02:12+00:00): Please don't apologise! I did the same with roads around Edinburgh at one point in my career, lol. The Wiki oftentimes doesn't have documentation of the consensus but you can usually find it or start a discussion on the OSM Community Forum to find the consensus. As far as I know, we tag test tracks as highway=service no matter the standard they're built to for navigational and aesthetic reasons.
SekeRob (2024-11-12 07:51:02+00:00): Salve,

Perché hai rimosso il tag highway da Via Casale? L'ho ripristinata in quanto, A) tutte le strade necessitano di una targhetta highway=*, B) ha reso il tratto di raccordo con i passi un orfano di routing.

caio
LorenzoPesci (2024-11-12 08:09:46+00:00): ovviamente hai ragione, non so spiegarmi come ho fatto a cancellare, grazie
SekeRob (2024-11-12 09:13:26+00:00): Stranamente, ID Editor non ha dato un avviso di chiusura nel riepilogo delle CS, a meno che non si sia accidentalmente premuto il pulsante Ignora. Anche in questo caso il tag di caratteristica (key) è minimo in qualsiasi modo. Con l'applicazione JOSM questo non sarebbe mai sfuggito. Me ne sono accorto perché.  A) Osmose ha segnalato il problema con un pin sulla mappa presto mattina, B) la strada è scomparsa da Carto standard. Di routine visito ogni CS in Carto map view, premo F5 dopo circa un minuto per vedere quali modifiche sono state apportate e quali no, e rileggo perché fare errori di typo è il mio forte. Le scritte in piccolo in JOSM sono difficili da vedere per me, in Carto sono più chiare.

felice mappatura.
silversurfer83 (2024-11-11 19:58:44+00:00): Hi there :)

couple of questions and remarks to this edit:

- what's the source for all of these hunting stands?

- please consider grouping your edits by region. This here could easily have been two edits.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

cheers
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159014374
rezemika (2025-06-29 16:26:43+00:00): Bonjour ! Je vois que vous avez une zone résidentielle vers Rezé Pont-Rousseau (celle-ci : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1332896639), qui ne comporte pas de source et qui recouvre majoritairement des zones à usage non-résidentielles (routes, parkings, etc). S'agit-il d'un import d'une base de données externe ou d'une simple erreur de placement ?
SekeRob (2024-11-11 17:39:05+00:00): Hi, note creator here. Was there a month ago and it was still the same with the map note I made years ago and the photo added 2 years ago by Duro Jifi. Now one part is bicycle yes and the other part is bicycle dismount. That's too late. bicycle=dismount will still route cyclists here.... a walk of a mile or more on rubble. I actually switch to the SS16 and return to the track at Le Morge. Not ideal, given the 16 is a racetrack, but does save you the agony and 1 or 2 tires. Never understood why the was never converted to proper track. Maybe because of the nude beach somewhere there, oops, now I spilled the beans.

ciao.

PS Got MTB size tires, but profile for road, Kevlar arming, chambers filled with anti-puncture goo, even 2 bottles with in bag with more goo of the "fix and inflate" type (helped me once) but that wont help prevent a cut on that rail rock stuff.
BHiko (2024-11-11 17:55:46+00:00): I was there last week and had a flat tire. 
That is why i updated as much as possible. bicycle=yes indicates bicycles are legally allowed. So that seems OK.
I moved the tags for the cycle route to the SS16.
BHiko (2024-11-11 19:55:35+00:00): I removed bicycle=yes on a part which is OK since it was redundant (double).
On the horrible part, it is now bicycle=dismount, smotheness:horrible, surface=gravel and the rcn (regional cycle network) indications are moved to SS16. 
That should prevent routing software to route bicycles through this path, except if they really want to prevent the highway=primary.
BHiko (2024-11-11 19:59:30+00:00): Change is a success: Two of the 3 bicycle routers currently do not route over the horrible part. https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_valhalla_bicycle&route=42.22529%2C14.55907%3B42.21374%2C14.58442#map=15/42.21873/14.57452&layers=Y
BHiko (2024-11-11 20:01:24+00:00): We will have to check OSRM routing in 2 days:
https://routing.openstreetmap.de/about.html