piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
woodpeck_repair (2025-02-18 14:00:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 162662644, 162662635, 162662638, 162662639, 162662647, 162662642, 162662633, 162662587, 162662631 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed and buggy import in Guadalajara, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17264 et al
NorthCrab_upload (2025-02-16 22:41:01+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/367562238

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-17 06:51:37+00:00): #seo #spam
NorthCrab_upload (2025-02-16 22:50:48+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12594102096

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2025-02-16 23:00:48+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12594110465

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
woodpeck_repair (2025-02-18 14:01:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 162662644, 162662635, 162662638, 162662639, 162662647, 162662642, 162662633, 162662587, 162662631 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed and buggy import in Guadalajara, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17264 et al
Staerk105 (2025-04-14 19:51:02+00:00): Hallo NGL-engel,
ich habe deinen Änderungssatz kürzlich bemerkt (wohne hier) und bin der Meinung, dass es der Lage vor Ort nicht gerecht wird, Gehwege als eigenständige Linien zu führen. Gemäß der groben Richtlinien hier https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Gehsteig ist es hier zutreffender, sie als Merkmal der Straße zu taggen, denn sie sind nur durch einen Bordstein getrennt. (Bzw. durch Bordstein plus Parkstreifen). Sie als separate Wege anzulegen führt an sämtlichen Einmündungen zu Schwierigkeiten, weil sich dort die Frage nach Fußgängerüberwegen stellt, obwohl man als Fußgänger ganz einfach auf dem Gehweg weiterläuft. Ich hoffe, du bist einverstanden, dass ich diese separate Anlage der Gehwege wieder rausgenommen habe.
Viele Grüße
NGL-engel (2025-04-15 21:12:21+00:00): Hallo Staerk105, 
   auch an den Gehwegen scheiden sich die Geister. Bei mir zuhause (im sehr ländlichem Bereich) gibt es nicht immer welche, und erst recht nicht immer an beiden Seiten. Deswegen wäre so eine Info schon hilfreich.
 
Aber wenn es bei Dir vor der Haustür anders ist dann habe ich nichts gegen Änderungen. Deswegen bin ich voll und ganz mit Deinen Änderungen einverstanden. 
Auch Danke für die Rückfrage :-)
NGL-engel
nullroute (2025-02-26 04:36:42+00:00): Hi Maddie, thanks for your update. I was looking at your changeset, and I had some questions.

I was wondering how you know this section of creek is part of the Cowskin. Clearly it dumps into the Cowskin.

However, I took a look at Google Streetview, and I found a sign on South 119th Street West that references the "Calfskin Flood Improvement Project."

It also seems to be labeled as the Calfskin not Cowskin on the Wichita GIS Viewer.

Here is a link to the GIS viewer from the city:

https://city-of-wichita-gis-cityofwichita.hub.arcgis.com/

Am I missing something? Thanks.
NeisBot (2025-02-16 23:30:38+00:00): Hi YaaRamis, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 86% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 1 landuse(')

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=162590772
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-17 06:33:02+00:00): Thanks for your private message.

It is usually better to revise map objects instead of deleting and drawing them new.
wireguy (2025-02-18 16:14:29+00:00): Thanks for adding this house.   It could use some squaring up of the corners.   Q key will do that.
eggie (2025-02-17 07:08:15+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  Tip...  Probeer concreet aan te geven wat je heb aangepast. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-02-17 07:19:04+00:00): De gebouwen en 'tank, heb ik opnieuw uitgelijnd mbv de BGT.
Een schuin genomen luchtfoto zet je vaak op het verkeerde been.
Groet
eggie
Flynn Marquardt (2025-02-17 08:45:41+00:00): Hello,

after this change the borders of Italy, Slovenia and others are borken, look here:
1.) https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/218657#map=19/46.523038/13.714504
2.) https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/218657#map=16/46.20854/13.42627

Can you please fix or revert this?
Fizzie-DWG (2025-02-20 00:51:50+00:00): Unfortunately, reverting vandalism often results in creating errors :-( Now apparently fixed though.
Flynn Marquardt (2025-02-20 09:36:00+00:00): If editing administrative borders it is always a good idea to verify your work in JOSM! That's what I always do: if JOSM still shows errors I do not upload.
somehundred (2025-02-17 12:57:25+00:00): You recreated multipolygons around Ivana kapi, aroudn Ziedoņdārzs and in areas south of Daugavas Stadions. The only useful changes done by you are at the third location. 

What was the reason for it? They have no reason to exist! These elements can exist as simple polygons without problems! 

I understand it might be easier to create areas which connect to each other using the multipolygon method. But I don't see a reason to restore multipolygons if you are not going to change anything there or if you're going to just move a few nodes around!

Fixing this edit without reverting your good edits seems very hard if not impossible. I might have to revert the entire change set if I'm not able to find a reliable way to fix this.
arcth (2025-02-17 23:17:11+00:00): Are there any mapping guidelines (OSM wiki?) stating that it was not a valid way to map landuse with multipolygons? Or is it just your personal view on uselessness of certain map features or mapping techniques?

While you correctly admit that it may be easier to use multipolygons to map landuse, it also reduces maintenance and further editing/refinement effort, especially in densely built-up areas. How can you know in advance if I plan to maintain the landuse in question long-term or 'just move a few nodes around'?
somehundred (2025-02-17 23:40:14+00:00): I don't know if there are but from my own experience I know that area borders divided into countless multipolygons make mapping extremely hard, especially for casual mappers who are not into advanced stuff like multipolygons. Other mappers have expressed frustration with this as well. And this can and will confuse new mappers who don't know anything about multipolygons and will be scared to touch them.

The main problem I have with this edit is that you restored multipolygons in first two locations I mentioned without changing almost anything else. Walls and fences around Ziedoņdārzs and Ivana kapi areas could have been easily added without recreating mps. You changed much more around south of Daugavas stadions so I don't have any particular complaints about those changes.

Again, if using this mp technique makes mapping easier, then keep using it. Just don't convert simple polygons to mps without any reason at all like you did in the first two locations.
arcth (2025-02-18 23:05:39+00:00): Did you try to find out why was the landuse mapped this way before declaring multipolygons useless and mass-converting them?

Mapping usually isn't one-off action. Once mapped, landuse may need further editing e.g. in order to add previously missed detail or reflect changes on the ground. For me editing landuse mapped as 'simple polygons' is significantly more time-consuming and requires extra effort compared to multipolygons. Should I expect you to maintain and refine the landuse you converted?
somehundred (2025-02-19 08:55:56+00:00): "Did you try to find out why was the landuse mapped this way before declaring multipolygons useless and mass-converting them?"

That's one the reason why I started this discussion and my theory that you find it easier to edit with mps was confirmed.

This method might be an easier one for you but don't you understand that other editors find it very hard to edit the section in the map you were editing after you, especially iD users? iD editor is quite restrictive, it will straight up prevent user from doing actions that may or may not cause errors, like disconnecting members of a mp or performing actions on an element if it's not entirely visible. That's annoying, but iD is intuitive and modern, interface is visually appealing. That's why I use iD for mainly simple tasks. But randomly comming across areas mapped like multipolygons which I want to edit always makes me sigh and open JOSM to deal with them and then return to iD to finish what I started.
arcth (2025-02-20 00:26:54+00:00): iD is not suitable for any complex editing by design. I believe this is not a reason to adjust the map data to fit iD's restrictions. Map data should not be adjusted for a particular piece of software i.e. editor/renderer [1]. Furthermore, iD has quite a long history of controversy [2] including related to mapping techniques it promoted.

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_map_for_the_renderer

[2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ID/Controversial_Decisions
richlv (2025-02-20 08:43:05+00:00): We have had lengthy and fruitful discussions on this in the past - what came out of that was that the general tendency of OSM is to make editing as frictionless as possible for an many people as possible.

This definitely is an important topic to discuss further, but changeset comments do not work that well for long discussions - it would be better to move this to the OSM Latvian community chat at https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com .
somehundred (2025-02-27 17:05:22+00:00): @arcth I really recommend you to check out the group chat @richlv posted. We can continue this discussion there. Another mapper made a really good point (that's as good as reply I would give) about this topic so advise you to read it: https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/358602-general/topic/rel.C4.81ciju.20lieto.C5.A1ana/near/500852509
wireguy (2025-02-18 16:10:34+00:00): Matheus, welcome to osm.  This change removed a section of RR track.  Please be careful.   I've added it back in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162667142
wireguy (2025-02-18 16:13:31+00:00): Thanks for adding Linden Board of Education. The outline is not very exact.  It is also glued to the park, but shouldn't be.    This could use some editing.  Quick tip, when you have a building selected, press Q key and the corners will square up.   Keep mapping!
wireguy (2025-02-18 16:19:55+00:00): One last comment.   A Jewish Church was added.   Is that correct?  Or should the religion value be changed, or maybe the building type.   
Please investigate and update.
pehar_11 (2025-02-17 01:12:57+00:00): Feel free to use this aerial imagery (way better than the 2021-22 DGU):
https://tms.osm-hr.org/rijeka-2020/{z}/{x}/{-y}.png

Edit > Background Settings (Shortcut "B") > Background > Adjustable and paste the link from above.
JaffaKetchup (2025-02-17 09:57:19+00:00): That imagery is nice and clear, thanks, although the Esri World Imagery seems to be a little newer.
RSydes (2026-01-06 07:07:41+00:00): If the Clear Springs / Illinois Ozark Trail is/was closed to the public, how were you able to map it with your GPS?
Jbensman (2026-01-06 13:04:37+00:00): I was new to OSM and did not know there were more options for the data source.  While I have GPS data for the area, I used the most recent Forest Service data which they used survey grade GPSs.  I now give the website for the sources.
Glassman (2025-02-17 20:54:11+00:00): Besides the name, adding a tag to describe the business is very helpful.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162591821
Glassman (2025-02-17 21:10:54+00:00): This edit had some errors which have been fixed. First the triangle area tagged with the name=Marsh Land isn't accurate. First the wetlands are much bigger, second the wetlands are already tagged.

You moved an address node a few blocks to the north. Not sure why.

Also, the curb ramp should be left at the curb location.

All of these errors have been corrected.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162591988
Minh Nguyen (2025-03-20 21:07:32+00:00): Hi, note that place=* tags intentionally don’t correspond to official designations as cities and villages, because they have to be harmonized globally or at least nationally. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163881091 changes South Lebanon back to a place=village. The boundary relation already indicates the official designation via border_type=city. For more information:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ohio/Map_features#Places
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States/Tags#Places
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/toward-a-national-system-for-functionally-classifying-populated-places/113674
Minh Nguyen (2025-03-20 21:08:26+00:00): Also, thanks for finally completing Warren County’s townships!
rhtb0 (2025-02-18 08:20:40+00:00): https://tiles.osm.kr/#18/37.57500/126.97700
오픈스트리트맵 한국에서는 군사 시설이 노출되지 않는 타일 서버를 공개하고 있습니다.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ko:%EB%B3%B4%EC%95%88%EA%B5%AC%EC%97%AD
rhtb0 (2025-02-18 08:22:18+00:00): 원칙적으로 이렇게 삭제하는 행위은 반달리즘에 해당합니다.
Glassman (2025-02-17 21:15:46+00:00): Why did you move the power poll? The pole shadow is visible in the imagery.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162592062
Glassman (2025-02-17 17:20:07+00:00): I have reverted the removal of a visible driveway. Please do not continue to remove features that exist as I explained before. If you do not agree with me, please leave a changeset comment explaining why it should be removed.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162592096
Frans S (2025-02-24 12:48:53+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
A remark.  Highways are always to be mapped as highway=....  (path, unclassified, track)
Not natural= ...
Best regards
SD Mapman (2025-02-17 15:38:16+00:00): Hello! Thank you for your contributions! I've noticed that some of your edits are a bit unorthodox, e.g. personal identifying information shouldn't be mapped. Micromapping is all well and good, just don't put your neighbor's name on it. If you have any questions on how any of this works, I've been mapping in South Dakota since 2011 so feel free to reach out. 

The wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page) is also useful if you have questions about tags.

Miles
woodpeck_repair (2025-02-18 14:01:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 162662644, 162662635, 162662638, 162662639, 162662647, 162662642, 162662633, 162662587, 162662631 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed and buggy import in Guadalajara, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17264 et al
AngocA (2025-02-21 02:56:51+00:00): Hola Felipe

Estaba viendo que has removido doble etiquetado de Wikipedia. Sin embargo, esto no está mal: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikipedia#Secondary_languages

Siempre y cuando el primario y los secundarios apunten a lo mismo.
JesseFTW (2025-02-17 14:06:09+00:00): Thanks for adding all these sidewalks -- they look good! In the future, please use slightly more descriptive changeset comments; something like "Added sidewalks and traffic humps in Stop & Shop parking lot and surrounding streets" would have been perfect. 

Thanks again for your work!
woodpeck_repair (2025-02-18 14:01:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 162662644, 162662635, 162662638, 162662639, 162662647, 162662642, 162662633, 162662587, 162662631 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed and buggy import in Guadalajara, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17264 et al
woodpeck_repair (2025-02-18 14:01:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 162662644, 162662635, 162662638, 162662639, 162662647, 162662642, 162662633, 162662587, 162662631 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed and buggy import in Guadalajara, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17264 et al
mariotomo (2025-02-17 08:08:16+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:natural%3Dtree_row
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenos_comentarios_en_conjuntos_de_cambios

Bienvenido a OSM y  ojalá puedas ayudar a ampliar y mejorar los datos relativos a Panamá.
Tommybara (2025-02-19 19:29:04+00:00): Đề nghị bạn xem xét kỹ trước khi sửa https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ll92ZYlAhJ8. Sau khi trả lại mặt đường ngã tư NVL-NHT thì đơn vị thi công cũng đã nắn thẳng nhánh nối này, mà hình vệ tinh Esri World Imagery mà bạn sử dụng chưa kịp cập nhật. Mong bạn lưu ý vấn đề này, cảm ơn bạn!
woodpeck_repair (2025-02-18 14:01:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 162662644, 162662635, 162662638, 162662639, 162662647, 162662642, 162662633, 162662587, 162662631 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed and buggy import in Guadalajara, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17264 et al
user_5359 (2025-02-18 13:54:48+00:00): Hello! Please use lowercase keys and only. Also longitude and latitude are part of a node (not an area).
mavl (2025-05-13 15:05:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
felipeeugenio (2025-02-17 13:17:33+00:00): Hola Luis.
El tag Building= es para estructuras, no para recintos completos que tienen un edificio dentro.
El tag building=no simplemente no existe, además de no tener ningún sentido.

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162595507
Baloo Uriza (2025-02-18 05:03:36+00:00): The name needs to only be the name, not branch information, as previously indicated.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162644960
felipeeugenio (2025-02-17 13:08:08+00:00): Hola Luis.
Me preocupan un poco tus ediciones.
Por favor date un tiempo para dibujar las curvas como corresponde. No es necesario contar con herramientas de suavizado de curvas, pero los caminos que dibujas hasta parecen mas esquemáticos que un intento por dibujar lo que hay en terreno. Hay partes donde el camino es realmente curvo, pero está dibujada una recta de varios cientos de metros. Y donde realmente hay curvas dibujas nu zigsageo que a la larga vamos a tener que borrar por completo para mejorar la geometría.
Por otro lado el landuse=residential es para áreas residenciales. No es un perímetro que se dibuja para cada casa en casa caserío.

Saludos y por favor cualquier cosa no dudes en escribirme ya sea por acá como por Telegram.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162595954
𒂼𒄄　 (2025-02-17 07:09:27+00:00): هل هذه كلها محلات رياضية؟
map per (2025-03-26 13:43:05+00:00): Hello ssssssl,

I would like to remind you that OSM is a community that only works with collaboration. So please explain your edits before you do any further additions of sport shops.

 As you either don't receive messages or deliberately ignore me and others I'm going to report you to the Data Working Group (1) in the next step.

Best regards
map per

(1) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Data_Working_Group
SuryanshGarg_IITBHU (2025-02-17 05:29:50+00:00): #IITBHU
Frank Peng (2025-12-23 21:10:27+00:00): Hello iismitch 55, what was the point of reworking this mall? You deleted valid mall building geometries and redrew them from scratch. Please don't do that. It's against good practice on OSM. If you really want to "rework" buildings, then please just modify their geometry by adding or moving nodes on the building outlines or changing the building tags instead of deleting the buildings altogether and redrawing them from scratch. Please keep the history on OSM.

Per the "Keep the history" section of the OSM Wiki article on good practice, it states:
>"When things change in the real world, be bold, and edit the map to reflect the current situation. But be aware that OpenStreetMap can store the editing history of an element. You can help preserve this history by modifying the existing elements instead of deleting them and redrawing from scratch."
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history
Frank Peng (2025-12-23 21:30:49+00:00): You also deleted valid retail building geometries from New River Valley Center and redrew the entire building. What is the point of deleting those valid buildings and redrawing them from scratch? There's no need to do that. Just modify the existing building geometries, outlines, or tags instead of deleting the buildings altogether and redrawing them anew. This helps preserve the history on OSM. It would be good to take a few steps to preserve this history.
Frank Peng (2026-01-06 10:40:48+00:00): Related changesets:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162366141
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162366017
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162365570

FacilMap links of this and related changesets:
https://facilmap.org/#q=changeset%20162596452
https://facilmap.org/#q=changeset%20162366141
https://facilmap.org/#q=changeset%20162366017
https://facilmap.org/#q=changeset%20162365570
literan (2025-02-18 17:14:21+00:00): это не название, это текст с вывески
user_22527970 (2025-02-17 20:07:41+00:00): Sockenpuppe
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-17 11:14:59+00:00): #seo #spam
AntMadeira (2025-02-17 15:41:14+00:00): Hi, Kaduna.
Can you please explain in which data did you relied to map this stretch of  highway as one way?

Regards,
António.
Kaduna (2025-02-19 02:27:25+00:00): Hi AntMadeira,

Thank you for reaching out to me. I have added the one-way tag to the highway based on the TomTom proprietary GPS traces that reflect the direction of the vehicle, which is cited within the changeset. I appreciate your feedback and look forward to hearing back regarding any other questions.