piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
literan (2025-04-07 19:45:48+00:00): здесь нужны кавычки, и на полигоне, и на тегах addr:place. Исправлю.
geo_ozon (2025-04-07 19:52:34+00:00): Большое спасибо.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-21 11:47:08+00:00): Skąd ta nazy które tu dodano w tej edycji? Z jakiego źródła się biorą?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-21 15:21:21+00:00): I jak to się stało że raz nazwa jedna a potem druga? Skąd się wzięły?
SpinOff (2025-05-21 21:47:57+00:00): Mamy chyba wandala. Lokalsi już poprawili te zmiany:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166559356

Tu jest jeszcze lepszy changeset:
https://osmcha.org/changesets/164648345
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-23 12:36:19+00:00): link które nie wymaga logowania w zewnętrznym serwisie: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164648345
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-27 16:26:41+00:00): @Map_Rivers skąd te nazwy?

Czy jakiekolwiek twoje edycje nie są niszczeniem danych?

Czy powinny być wszystkie wycofane?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-24 16:10:03+00:00): Jestem  w trakcie wycofania wszystkich zniszczeń i prawdopodobnych zniszczeń wykonanych przez tą osobę
galen8183 (2025-04-07 19:05:56+00:00): large bbox is due to an unrelated edit slipping in: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1168866732 ... still working on PT features :-)
voltairovicz (2025-04-07 19:17:09+00:00): Witaj, czemu stosujesz takie "kanciaste" połączenia łącznic z drogami? Trajektoria ruchu, pasów drogowych  tak nie wygląda
pavvv (2025-04-07 20:04:40+00:00): Jak chcesz, to możesz je poprawić. Na celu jedynie miałem skrócić ich długość, bo od pewnego momentu nie ma fizycznego rozdzielenia.
eggie (2025-04-07 20:27:04+00:00): Hoi..

Hier heb je volgens mij per abuis  een adresnode verplaatst.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=164649725
Wellicht even kijken waar die heen is gegaan?
Mvg..
eggie
eggie (2025-04-07 20:41:44+00:00): Denk hier...
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649725#map=19/51.601494/4.718759&layers=N

Markt 31
CPK-PrB (2025-04-07 20:54:38+00:00): Er was per abuis een adres verplaatst.
Ik deed de bewerking met een tablet, i.p.v. met de PC. Dit bleek al minder goed te werken.
Ik vond echter geen mogelijkheid om de bewerking ongedaan te maken, heb hem nu handmatig terug gezet.
Wel minimaal andere gps locatie dan eerder.

Mvg,
Corné.
eggie (2025-04-07 21:05:36+00:00): 👍
Boris Verkhovskiy (2025-04-10 05:55:49+00:00): I think all this user's edits can be deleted
Baloo Uriza (2025-04-07 20:43:06+00:00): Looks like an unpaved alleyway, not a minor road.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164649998
NeisReview (2025-04-08 05:02:22+00:00): #UnexplainedChanges

Hello, welcome to OSM.

Could you please clarify the purpose behind your map changes? It's not entirely clear from the edited data and your added description. Also, what was used as a source of your activity?

Looking forward to your response. 
Thank you.
BCNorwich (2025-04-08 05:15:05+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Unfortunately your test has removed tags from a bus route and deformed the outline of a church. It's possible that you were not aware of the inadvertent corruption to the database? Anyway I've corrected the situation by reverting the changeset.

I see that Jo White does have an office around here, can I help in any way?

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2025-04-08 05:20:44+00:00): Hi I now see JO Wight's office is at The Crossing, can you indicate where it's situated.

Regards Bernard.
spiregrain (2025-04-08 10:54:36+00:00): This might be an attempt to answer: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Jo%20White%20MP/diary/406508

Intriguing possibility that the user here is actually the MP for Bassetlaw.
habi (2025-05-26 08:11:20+00:00): Hey!
Hier hast du die zwei Becken der Brunnen im Kocherpark zu "Brunnenschächten" (`water_well`) umgewandelt: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:man_made%3Dwater_well
Das stimmt so nicht, die beiden Dinger sind Becken und waren so wie sie erfasst waren gut erfasst.
Ich habe das rückgängig gemacht,
Gruss,
Habi
albinfo2 (2025-05-27 22:12:38+00:00): Danke!
MxxCon (2025-04-10 20:46:41+00:00): As documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone#Usage phone numbers must be separated ONLY by - or space. They must not contain any other characters, like ( ). Additionally, phone numbers must include country dialing code. In US it's +1.
This POI should be updated to fix this.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164650393
Frans S (2025-05-13 15:11:41+00:00): Hello. 
Thanks for mapping.
A short note. Please do not add a layer to a building to hide an error !
Just fix it.
Best regards
MxxCon (2025-04-10 20:47:07+00:00): Hello.
As documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone#Usage phone numbers must be separated ONLY by - or space. They must not contain any other characters, like ( ). Additionally, phone numbers must include country dialing code. In US it's +1.
This POI should be updated to fix this.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164650537
Dawid2849 (2025-04-08 09:42:07+00:00): Cześć. Widzę, że w ostatnim czasie mapowałeś dużo linii energetycznych w Ziemi Biłgorajskiej (Tarnogród, Biłgoraj, Harasiuki, Potok Górny itd). Dzięki, bo było z tym dość ubogo, ale mam pewny pytanie. Czy w wolnej chwili byłbyś zainteresowany zmapowaniem GPO Dzwola (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1239452237)? Nie ma go na orto, trzeba korzystać z warstwy uzbrojenie z Geoportalu. Ja się nie znam na energetyce i nie mam pojęcia jak się za to zabrać
felipeeugenio (2025-04-07 21:07:49+00:00): Hola. SI ya usó el tag tourism= en un ndo, no hace falta repetirlo en el edificio que aloja el nodo.
saludod
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164650726
geisthugo123 (2025-04-07 21:22:46+00:00): Hi und danke für den Edit,
aber ist das sicher Asphalt?
Das ganze war nämlich zuvor mit grade2 getaggt, also eher etwas unbefestigter?
Viele Grüße
geisthugo123 (2025-04-20 17:37:09+00:00): Wie siehts aus?
Viele Grüße
literan (2025-04-08 19:59:27+00:00): удалил лифты. Или рисуйте нормально, или, если вам не хочется, оставьте другим. Но не ломайте роуминг
bartgron (2025-12-12 22:34:14+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
IvanBabić (2025-04-08 12:50:24+00:00): I revert it because a relation was tagged #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164678385
silversurfer83 (2025-04-08 19:14:41+00:00): Hi :)

du hast darum gebeten, dass sich jemand diese Änderung ansieht.

Wenn du dir die Wegbeschaffenheiten vor Ort angesehen hast sieht das alles plausibel aus. Mir ist nichts aufgefallen, was falsch wäre.

happy mapping
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164651474
Filip009CZ (2025-04-10 20:27:15+00:00): Zdravím, aké máš zdroje k Veľkej a Malej kope?
pavvv (2025-04-07 20:54:32+00:00): Hey, it's a mistake to add smoothness=good along with cycleway:smoothness=excellent. You probably meant footway:smoothness=good.
Alexey Vazhnov (2025-04-07 21:07:52+00:00): Yes, I agree, "footway:smoothness=good" should be logical here. The problem is — I'm not 100% sure about it — I used a bicycle part, which was really good, and in common about the whole road I can say "smoothness=good".
I can visit this place one more time to check the smoothness of the footway.
pavvv (2025-04-08 05:08:04+00:00): So it would be better not to add this tag instead of guessing.
Alexey Vazhnov (2025-04-08 05:51:05+00:00): I will visit this place again and check all the details.

Thank you very much for controlling the changes!
Alexey Vazhnov (2025-12-10 19:41:22+00:00): And… finally fixed!
https://osm.org/changeset/175774384
Map_HeRo (2025-04-07 20:23:44+00:00): Quellangaben vergessen: Erhebung vor Ort, GPS, Luftbild, DGM1
NorthCrab_upload (2025-04-07 20:32:06+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12737477422
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/268913302

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Barroszt (2025-08-04 22:15:56+00:00): poprawione
Frans S (2025-05-05 15:37:38+00:00): hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please do not cluster adjacent buildings.  Square each rectangular building as well.
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2025-05-09 14:16:02+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping. 
Difficult area to map.
Big building blocks with several stories and courtyards
Check here how high buildings ought to be mapped.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1z7uDwYm4oNmlexHIhJxGCjPpNhCQAgRia5aEJr_4MwM/edit?usp=sharing

Many tall buildings have a small building, a superstructure, lift building or something similar on the roof, do not map it as a separate building, just map the roof lines of the complete building.. 
The dark objects next to buildings to the west is the shadow the building give. Don't map it as a separate building.

Best regards and keep mapping
pyrog (2025-08-05 20:32:59+00:00): Bonsoir,

Cette voie est une soit une voie de service, soit une rue résidentielle, mais pas un sentier.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1375682857

Elle est visible sur l'orthophoto mais pas encore sur les photos de rues Mapillary, Apple ou Google qui sont trop anciennes.
Fabien98 (2025-08-05 23:32:12+00:00): Bonsoir, 
Oui vous avez surement raison voie de service est certainement plus adapté au vu de l'ortho.
 j'ai changé le type de route mais je ne peux pas confirmer car n'étant pas dans la zone..
rskedgell (2025-04-07 22:30:39+00:00): Please don't remove features which actually exist, just tag them correctly. Only features which do not exist should be deleted.

In this case, all you needed to do was add service=driveway to the highway=service which was already present.

Reinstated in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164654950
user_22716426 (2025-04-08 20:14:42+00:00): Apologies, my understanding was that only driveways like those that lead to a property were mapped, i have not seen any other normal driveways mapped in this manner before. I will take note of this for future reference.
rskedgell (2025-04-08 23:07:01+00:00): No problem. Looking at the history of the service road/driveway, it was added by someone who worked for Amazon Logistics. Presumably they felt it was useful, but probably should have tagged it as a driveway in the first place.
MxxCon (2025-04-08 19:43:14+00:00): Hello.
You added building:part=yes completely overlapping the existing polygon. What are you trying to map here?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164652385
alleycat01! (2025-04-08 20:12:59+00:00): Hi!  I am trying to map the 3D features correctly here according to
 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_3D_Buildings

There is a building:part interior to the building: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/317206159

When you've got one part, according to the doc: "The entire building outline should be filled with building:part=* areas, tagged with their respective height and other attributes."

Previously, the existing polygon was tagged building:part=yes and there was no footprint at all, so I stripped the building:part=yes from the footprint and added another way that is the lower elevation building:part=yes guy.  

Does that make sense?  According to the doc, you need a footprint, and separately if you add parts you need the union of the parts to cover the footprint, otherwise 3D renderers get mixed up on when to show parts vs footprints.
MxxCon (2025-04-09 20:21:01+00:00): 131 Broome Street, building NW of this one doesn't have this building:part and https://osmbuildings.org, https://streets.gl/#40.71563,-73.98448,45.00,0.00,388.22 and https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=40.7164388&lon=-73.9846449&zoom=19 All render both buildings correctly.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164652385
alleycat01! (2025-04-10 16:53:24+00:00): 131 has two building:part=yes pieces and no outline:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/317209066
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/250268364

If you took away that tag on the last guy, I think streets GL would only render the center column, they talk about it in depth here: https://github.com/StrandedKitty/streets-gl/issues/3

In any case, the change I made was just to add an outline, and keep the two previous parts as the spec mentions.
NeisReview (2025-04-08 05:02:45+00:00): #UnexplainedChanges

Hello, welcome to OSM.

Could you please clarify the purpose behind your map changes? It's not entirely clear from the edited data and your added description. Also, what was used as a source of your activity?

Looking forward to your response. 
Thank you.
Baloo Uriza (2025-04-07 20:54:22+00:00): Looks like you may have inadvertently glued this camera to a power line.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164652556
Jrachi (2026-04-02 14:59:13+00:00): "taglio invernale per ciaspole (con neve assestata)! non è un nome!
Lord-O (2026-04-02 23:54:52+00:00): Suppongo tu stia parlando del taglio che porta a Corona Troggi; si chiamava già così,  non è neanche un sentiero, tagli per i prati, credo sia stato aggiunto per indicare che è fattibile.
Jrachi (2026-04-03 05:47:24+00:00): Name è un nome secondo la lingua italiana. quella è decisamente una descrizione. Usa il tag description se pensi che sia un'informazione utile

Ivo
GPYes (2025-04-07 21:14:28+00:00): Correction: Source used was Esri World Imagery; INEGI; Maxar satellite imagery via MGP Pro 2025-01-30 .
NorthCrab_upload (2025-04-07 21:20:49+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12737547166
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/263454354

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-07 22:21:40+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised Import & poor quality

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164654805
d3mol3k (2026-02-19 18:25:40+00:00): to nie jest fotoradar mierzący prędkość z wartością 140 km/h - to fotokontrola Autostrady Wielkopolskiej obejmującą zakaz wyprzedzania poj. ciężarowych na tym odcinku od znaku do kamer.
Frans S (2025-05-06 07:36:37+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping
Many buildings were mapped with Bing Imagery as backgroud,
The instructions mention to use the ESRI imagery.
Quite a number of buildings need to be adjusted, mapped or placed on the correct footprint.
The task is invalidated

Best regards and keep mapping
MxxCon (2025-04-08 19:51:56+00:00): Hello. Please note that a business occupies only part of a building, it should be mapped as a separate node with in the perimeter of that building. You shouldn't tag the whole building as that biz.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164653852
Baloo Uriza (2025-04-08 13:15:36+00:00): Just a heads up, you seem to have attached this camera to a landuse boundary inadvertently.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164654278
Warhead2 (2025-04-09 20:48:59+00:00): the camera is attached to the stop light pole
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-07 22:21:55+00:00): PLease see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17522
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-14 12:22:29+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12737621217/history has building = proposed that was added in this edit
Is this building existing now? Are there at least real plans for building it? If there are no serious plans for it - that should be entirely deleted. If construction started then building=construction is a better tag. If construction is upcoming then source for this claim should be tagged on the geometry itself (source tag, note tag) and different tagging should be used - we are mapping proposed features in OpenStreetMap very sparingly, not every promise or business plan should be mapped here.
hikui87 (2025-05-14 15:20:58+00:00): Hello! This is a new subdivision in my local area. The preliminary work has been completed, and the plat has been recorded by the County. The lots are currently for sale, with several already under contract. To my knowledge, no actual construction has started yet, which is why I used the proposed tag, and my understanding is that this is its proper use. I have added the source to the residential landuse area as a website. I can add it to the individual building nodes if that is the preferred method, but that seemed excessive to me at the time. I normally change the tag to construction once the building permit has been obtained and filed.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-15 17:38:26+00:00): I guess that makes sense here, especially with nodes
NeisBot (2025-04-07 22:09:52+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2025-04-11 08:22:39+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/164803704
NeisBot (2025-04-08 04:06:40+00:00): Hi neili, and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

Over the past 7 days, you've made more than 100 changesets without adding any comment.

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good changeset comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments.

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment
yelisey90 (2025-04-07 23:04:05+00:00): partly rv: no reason to delete Upper Vedzisi; Saburtalo node shouldn't be at the same point as Kazbegi node (I wil re-revert Vera shortly)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164655466
Jordi MF (2025-04-07 23:42:06+00:00): Hola ptolomeo,

Como ya he comentado en un changeset anterior (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164647973), no es correcto añadir nombres descriptivos (ya has añadido la información en la etiqueta "description"). El nombre "Radar de Tramo" no es el verdadero nombre de este elemento.

Saludos

Deben de eliminarse.
joel56dt (2025-04-09 20:09:18+00:00): Hi grrla,
How did you determine this was incorrectly tagged? It looks like motorcycle parking to me.
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=49.277690872631&lng=-123.12731594898&z=18.47900548898658&pKey=762704382614051&x=0.3303382916222829&y=0.47297043642407144&zoom=1.5996885073652467&focus=photo
Thanks,
Joel
user_3107993 (2025-04-11 21:36:53+00:00): I have reverted the incorrect changes
joel56dt (2025-04-12 17:16:35+00:00): Thanks! And thanks for cleaning up the secondary tags, too. I didn't realise those were half bike parking half motorcycle parking.
NeisReview (2025-04-08 05:03:13+00:00): #UnexplainedChanges

Hello, welcome to OSM.

Could you please clarify the purpose behind your map changes? It's not entirely clear from the edited data and your added description. Also, what was used as a source of your activity?

Looking forward to your response. 
Thank you.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-07-15 09:41:48+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1175815019/history has surface = steel that was added in this edit
Maybe surface=metal material=steel would be better tagging? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface%3Dmetal
AndyB_66 (2025-04-09 07:34:02+00:00): Te obiekty nie mają nazw własnych.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164709957
muralito (2025-04-09 14:52:59+00:00): Hola. Herramientas de control de calidad marcaron muchos errores en esta zona por el cambio de nombre, que no se hizo en los nodos de los numeros de puerta ni en las relaciones.

Los datos oficiales del SIG de IMM muestran los nombres anteriores. Parece confusa la situación.

¿Que fuente tomaste para cambiar estos nombres?

Saludos.
woodpeck_repair (2025-04-07 23:30:18+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 164619255, 164619285, 164619329.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-04-08 22:31:03+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/saraswathi89 appears to be related to this organized mapping effort.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-09 02:01:39+00:00): Certainly does! Thanks!
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-04-09 20:24:05+00:00): Another one
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Reddi%20chandu%20boda
watmildon (2025-07-31 05:49:01+00:00): Thanks for adding the mascot!
CrisElGeek (2025-04-08 00:11:54+00:00): The pedestrian bridge was demolished and no longer exists.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-04-08 08:13:12+00:00): You also deleted https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/139261097/history/35
citrula (2025-04-08 02:23:22+00:00): this historical marker isn't here anymore.
julcnx (2025-05-04 05:23:46+00:00): Hi Michael, hope you're doing well.

Was this change based on a personal survey?

Just a heads-up: access tags like `bicycle=no` or `horse=no` should only be used if there are actual signs prohibiting access—not to describe how practical or suitable the path is. As far as I know, there are no legal restrictions here, so I’ll need to remove those access tags.

If you’ve personally surveyed the route on foot, horse or by mountain bike, it’s recommended to indicate suitability using `sac_scale`, `mtb:scale` or `horse_scale` instead.

More info here: [https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject\_Thailand/Hiking\_Guide](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Thailand/Hiking_Guide)
Michael Medley (2025-05-10 00:41:52+00:00): Hi Julien. Thanks for the guidance. It helps me remember the difference between legal/permissive characteristics and physical ones. I'm a hiker so I'll try to start using sac_scale.
julcnx (2025-05-11 08:20:02+00:00): Hi Michael,

Did you survey the entire trail here? The trace looks like it might come from an enduro race, so I’m a bit skeptical that it was fully walked. If you only surveyed a portion of it, the segment should be split and the tags updated accordingly.

Let me know—I'll adjust things as needed. And if you have any questions about the hiking guide, feel free to ask.

Best,
Julien
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164656759
Michael Medley (2025-05-13 00:15:54+00:00): Hi Julien. You are right to suspect that I did not survey the entire trail (if it is worthy the name of trail). I just tried to use a segment of it on the western side of the southern tip as part of a hike, and found it to be very poor as a path. I should not have extrapolated and converted the whole "line" loop to a path.
julcnx (2025-05-13 08:54:17+00:00): Hi Michael,

No worries at all — we’ve all made that mistake at some point. I’ve reverted your initial change.

When upgrading tags on a trail you've surveyed, it’s best to drag and drop the GPX traces directly on the map and split the path or road segments at the points where you turned back or changed direction. That way, you can safely apply tags only to the sections you've actually surveyed.

Also, iD has a feature to highlight changes, which helps visualize the edits you're making.

Best,
Julien
infeeeee (2025-04-08 07:45:43+00:00): Hello! Welcome to OpenStreetMap!

If you can't speak Hungarian reply, and I will translate this to English.

Szia! Üdv az OpenStreetMapen!

A disused:amenity=pub címke elég, nem kell mellé a amenity=disused is. 

Ha kérdésed merülne fel, a magyar szerkesztő közösség elérhetőségeit megtalálod ezen az oldalon: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hungary/Közösség#Elérhetőségek

További jó térképezést!
Bence_ (2025-04-08 17:09:32+00:00): Szia!
Köszi szépen, javítottam.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-09 07:06:14+00:00): Please, read and follow https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments