piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Jakaka2222 (2025-06-07 16:44:50+00:00): Ik weet vrij zeker dat er aan de weg gewerkt wordt, want ik heb het aan een paar bouwvakkers van Bam daar gevraagd en die zijden dat ze bezig waren met de voorbereidingen voor de onderdoorgang. En op de kaart van ProRail is dit waar de tijdelijke weg is.

Ik heb het adres niet verwijderd, omdat ik niet zeker weet of het nog gebruikt wordt om materialen voor het bouwproject af te leveren. Dat is dus geen probleem begrijp ik?

Ik heb niks met het pad gedaan, omdat ik er vanuit ga dat deel verwijderd wordt. Ik ga het pad dan pas verwijderen als het ook in de echte wereld verwijderd is. Toch?
eggie (2025-06-07 17:05:44+00:00): Dag Jakaka,
Dat adres is er niet meer..  dus kon weg.
Het pad is een ander dingetje. Daar lopen twee belangrijke wandelroutes overheen; Ons Kloosterpad en een knooppuntroute.
Dat kan niet zomaar onderbroken worden.
Dat pad zal dan tijdelijk omgeleid moeten worden via die tijdelijke weg en zal vast anders terugkomen.
Tegen die tijd even hulp vragen aan bv het forum en vragen of iemand een oplossing weet.
Met iD en zonder ervaring kun je geen routes bewerken.
Mapse
eggie
Jakaka2222 (2025-06-07 21:50:48+00:00): Fijn dat je even zegt dat het pad zo belangrijk is. Ik dacht dat het alleen een afsnijding was zodat je niet om hoeft te lopen. Ik ga er inderdaad vanuit dat ze het pad met de tijdelijke weg verbinden, maar de kaart van prorail laat geen pad zien. Ook in de permanente situatie die meer gedetailleerd is laat prorail geen trap naar de onderdoorgang zien. Of ze zijn dit pad ook vergeten in de kaarten of ze komen er ook niet en het woord omlopen, maar dat zien we dan wel.
eggie (2025-06-08 04:36:00+00:00): Het gaat niet zozeer om het pad op zich maar om de routerelaties. Die zullen omgelegd 'moeten' worden.
Jakaka2222 (2025-06-08 09:21:21+00:00): Dan zal ik dan inderdaad hulp moeten vragen.
fserges (2025-06-10 14:35:49+00:00): Очень грубое изменение которое разбило валидатор https://atd.openstreetmap.ru/ .Более подробное описание в теме https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/https-atd-openstreetmap-ru/65879/1870
Глеб (2025-06-11 07:02:51+00:00): Вернул
Gregory Peony (2025-07-16 16:37:10+00:00): Hi Dou g Wilson, the footprints you mapped here are generally valid (exist in imagery), accurate and appropriately squared. I flagged the most likely candidates for footprints wich envelope multiple buildings. Though it can be difficult to tell with some of the buildings in this area, use roof colour, orientation, and shadow to determine where one building ends and another begins. Overall this is a high quality contribution; thank you. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167279963
NorthCrab_upload (2025-06-06 18:20:46+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2735640182
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1392754623

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
trigpoint (2026-03-07 13:38:38+00:00): Hello PharmaWP
Phil from the Data Working Group
Please be careful and review entries suggested by iD for wikidata tags. Blindly following them is effectively an undiscussed mechanical edit.

For example https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1359479838/history/6 is not part of brand:wikidata=Q133280052. Castle is one of the most common pub names in the country and the name does not indicate that they belong to a chain.
Phil
PharmaWP (2026-03-10 22:30:49+00:00): Thanks for your vigilance. I know this tool is not made to be followed automatically and I do my best to handle every case with as much discrenment as possible, I may sometimes be fallible
eggie (2025-06-06 19:57:48+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback   Wellicht wilde je wat uitproberen? Ik heb je verzorgingshuis met adres (niet hier)  verwijderd.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
suchAnight (2025-06-12 20:04:48+00:00): Hello ZagaX,
I noticed some classification changes in and around Agua Prieta, Mexico, and was wondering if there is a specific resource you’re referencing to determine these updates?

Some of the features upgraded to trunk (such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31067345 to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/983609238) now end abruptly or are isolated from the greater trunk network. There are similar cases that travel along the MEX 2 within Agua Prieta itself (such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/312995491 to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/312993704 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/312993708 to  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/983908761). The Mexico OSM editing guidelines page has criteria for trunk road classifications that indicate some of these classification changes differ from community direction and clearly states,“If there is a section with traffic lights, that section cannot be trunk so it is put as primary.”(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Mexico/Red_Nacional_de_Caminos#Troncales_(highway=trunk)). 

In order to maintain consistency within the Mexico highway network, would you be open to restoring the trunk along the MEX 2 back to primary, and the trunk along Avenida 20 de Noviembre back to secondary? 

Thank you for your time and have a nice day,
suchAnight

traducción automática:

Hola ZagaX,
He notado algunos cambios de clasificación en Agua Prieta, México y sus alrededores, y me preguntaba si hay algún recurso específico al que estés haciendo referencia para determinar estas actualizaciones.

Algunas de las características actualizadas a la red troncal (como de https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31067345 a https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/983609238) ahora terminan abruptamente o están aisladas de la red troncal principal. Existen casos similares que recorren la MEX 2 dentro de Agua Prieta (como de https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/312995491 a https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/312993704 y de https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/312993708 a https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/983908761). La página de directrices de edición de OSM México incluye criterios para la clasificación de carreteras troncales que indican que algunos de estos cambios difieren de las directrices de la comunidad y establece claramente: "Si hay un tramo con semáforos, ese tramo no puede ser troncal, por lo que se considera principal" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Mexico/Red_Nacional_de_Caminos#Troncales_(highway=trunk)).

Para mantener la coherencia en la red de carreteras de México, ¿estaría dispuesto a que la troncal a lo largo de la MEX 2 vuelva a ser principal y la troncal a lo largo de la Avenida 20 de Noviembre a secundaria?

Gracias por su tiempo y que tenga un buen día.
suchAnight
ZagaX (2025-07-02 23:39:41+00:00): Hello, friend.

I apologize in advance. However, I don't know the actual basis for the document you're referring to, as it doesn't seem consistent with the local identification, taking into account urban development and municipal traffic management.

The attempted change in priority and road type would be correct, based on the local traffic hierarchy. If someone tries to apply this document, then the previously modified roads should be downgraded, as well as the roads identified as 6th Avenue and surrounding areas in Agua Prieta, Sonora, and equivalently, Pan-American Avenue in the urban area of ​​Douglas, Arizona. Neither of these would comply with the article you're referring to.

Likewise, someone is adding nonexistent main roads in the Agua Prieta, Sonora, sector, without local knowledge, because they are only unpaved streets. Otherwise, they are removing the upgrade from newly paved main avenues to single streets.

These changes, without real knowledge of the area, create traffic and planning problems for systems that use OSM data as a source.

Have a great day.
suchAnight (2025-07-07 18:42:08+00:00): Hello ZagaX,

The Mexico/National Road Network wiki page (osm.wiki/ES:Mexico/Red_Nacional_de_Caminos#Troncales_(highway=trunk)) is the official Mexico community approved classification system adopted for OSM which as an organized team we adhere to. If you find this policy out-of-date or too restrictive, a good first step would be to introduce the issue on the Mexico Telegram channel (https://t.me/osm_mx (found on the main Mexico OSM page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:M%C3%A9xico)) for community wide discussion. 

Whatever the Mexico OSM community officially adopts and updates on the country wiki, we are happy to adhere to. Have a good day!

*traducción automática

Hola ZagaX,

La página wiki de la Red Nacional de Carreteras de México (osm.wiki/ES:Mexico/Red_Nacional_de_Caminos#Troncales_(highway=trunk)) es el sistema de clasificación oficial aprobado por la comunidad mexicana, adoptado para OSM, y al que nos adherimos como equipo organizado. Si consideras que esta política está desactualizada o es demasiado restrictiva, un buen primer paso sería presentar el problema en el canal de Telegram de México (https://t.me/osm_mx (disponible en la página principal de OSM de México https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:M%C3%A9xico)) para su discusión en la comunidad.

Con gusto nos adherimos a cualquier cambio que la comunidad de OSM de México adopte y actualice oficialmente en la wiki del país. ¡Que tengas un buen día!
woodpeck (2025-07-30 18:17:50+00:00): Hello eerib, could you clarify what the "ref:borden=DkRs-16" tag is to mean here? Same question with https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12953013898 on the Stawamus river. To these point to a public source of archaelogical sites?
eerib (2025-07-30 18:28:16+00:00): Hello woodpeck,

"ref:borden" is in reference to the Borden System, a Canadian system of uniquely identifying archaeological sites. The first four letters reference a grid cell and the trailing numbers are specific to a certain site within that grid cell.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Borden_System

There is no public database source for archaeological sites in Canada. Instead, one can sometimes find the details on in-person signage, books, research papers, or land use planning documents.

Hope this helps! eerib
woodpeck (2025-07-30 22:47:36+00:00): The DWG is in contact with someone from the Squamish Nation who claims that this particular archaeological site is nondescript, i.e. if you visite the site you would not see that it even is a site, much less would you know its Borden number. Can you shed some more light on your data source?
eerib (2025-07-30 23:45:05+00:00): Hello Woodpeck,

The archaeological (Node ID: 12892781186) is rock shelter site below a very large glacial erratic boulder where materials were recently found in the soil substrate that date back approximately 7,000 years.

An unsanctioned popular trail locally called "Mischief" travels near the site as it goes between the very large glacial erratic boulder and another smaller boulder.

In addition, the glacial erratic boulder has been called the "Barge Rock" by the rock climbing community as apart of the "Around the Squaw" group of rock climbing crags.

Information about this site has been provided to members of the local community as apart of the land use planning process for this area and is mentioned in the public "Shannon Basin Visitor Use Management Project" meeting notes.

At the start of this year, the local mountain bike trail advocacy association was tasked with upgrading and developing a new section of trail North of this trail, hence the "Old Mischief" and "New Mischief" trail names in this area. This works included public volunteer trail building events.

In addition, the local rock climbing advocacy association was tasked with deactivating the sport climbing route on the boulder.

Both local organizations provided brief updates to their membership regarding the works.

It is my understanding that the government plans to install signage in the area to advise of the cultural significance of the area and to discourage rock climbing and bouldering on the glacial erratics and to discourage use of the trail. In addition, the government may develop first of its kind public access restrictions in this general area.

I do not normally add archaeological sites to OpenStreetMap but since this site in particular is unique in that it has pre-existing use, is known to members of the community, will have signage, and has played an influential role in the land use planning is why I decided that it was worth adding to OpenStreetMap.

If the community consensus or Data Working Group determine that archaeological sites should not be mapped then I would not be against it. I would just ask that guidelines for archaeological sites be further clarified on the OpenStreetMap wiki page for historic=archaeological_site.

Please let me know if you require further clarification.

Be advised that this is similar to a previous discussion I had with the Data Working Group (user: Glassman) in July 2024 via private message ("Archaeological Sites in BC").

Thank you, eerib
Allison P (2025-06-06 20:21:04+00:00): Thank you for adding the new traffic pattern. Avoid abbreviating names in OSM. Directionals and suffixes should be spelled out (East Karcher Road). The roundabout should not have a name at all.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-06-07 10:22:51+00:00): Hi! please note that bing and mapbox aerial imagery are not aligned correctly. The alignment was correct before, using official geodesic data from Géodésie Québec.
VLD299 (2025-06-13 15:17:35+00:00): Hello ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy, 

I apologize for the alignment mistake. Thank you for reaching out to let me know. 

-VLD299
Polarbear (2025-06-26 20:49:32+00:00): Hi Berlin53, 
baustellenbedingte maxspeed=30 oder no left turn sollte man eigentlich nur mappen, wenn man die Situation auch zeitnah beobachtet und mit der Baustelle beräumt. ;-)
eggie (2025-06-07 09:39:34+00:00): Dag Jan Dat pad met de wandel- en d-fietsroute zit geplakt aan de landuse=grass

Dat zal denk ik geen actie van jou zijn.
Binnen OSM is de consensus om geen paden vast te plakken met de vlakken.
De kaart wordt onwerkbaar daardoor.

Losmaken is ook weer zo'n dingetje.  :)
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=167283094
MVG
eggie
janhals (2025-06-07 19:20:45+00:00): Dag eggi, 
Was me bewust van het probleem. Wist niet of ik het (goed) had opgelost. Vandaar mijn vraag om overleg.
HG, Jan.
eggie (2025-06-07 19:25:26+00:00): Hoi.. zou het maar even zo laten. Het routeert verder goed.
Gr eggie
rskedgell (2025-06-17 12:27:52+00:00): Tagging as highway=cycleway does not imply anything about who has priority, but it does render a cycleway invisible on OSM Carto.
rskedgell (2025-06-17 12:30:43+00:00): * changing to highway=footway renders it invisible in OSM Carto.

Please could you point me to the wiki page where it says that they value of highway=* should be determined by Highway Code Rules H1-H3?
mstrbrid (2025-06-17 16:26:28+00:00): You're right, but it does have implications for the design of the way. Often the shared ways are pavements (sidewalks) and are designed for pedestrian use. They are then frequently condoned for cycling by adding signage, but not necessarily redesigning the pavement for the increased speed and routing considerations of cyclists. By tagging them as segregated or shared footway=sidewalks, I hope to capture this distinction that exists in the UK.
Pontificator Extraordinaire (2025-06-07 02:38:06+00:00): Please be detailed in your changeset comments, it can be hard to figure out what exactly you tweaked, or why, especially with changesets this large.

If you need guidance, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Langlaeufer (2025-06-11 09:08:17+00:00): Danke fürs aufräumen der doppelten Wege
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167283488
@luskaz (2025-06-08 20:04:59+00:00): Cara qual é o teu problema? Sério mesmo
mavl (2025-06-09 14:55:53+00:00): @cblacksheep  
Hello. This changeset deletes the bus stops. Why are bus stops vandalism? Bus stops don't exist?
user_9848150 (2025-06-09 16:04:39+00:00): Привет, @mavl! Я снова добавлю остановки. Откат был из-за неправильного навязывания названий улиц и проспектов, хотя они есть на Google Maps и считаются общепринятыми. Спасибо за замечание, ещё раз подтверждаю остановки автобусов добавлю.
mavl (2025-06-09 16:21:40+00:00): Good. Thank you.  
But OSM can't use Google Maps.  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright
user_9848150 (2025-06-09 16:37:32+00:00): Да не за что, это я спасибо говорю  (^-^)
fserges (2025-06-09 19:05:54+00:00): Он точно сейчас округ? Я смотрю официальные сайты и там везде район: https://vk.com/tashtagolofficial?ysclid=mbpglxos53573232814 и https://t.me/tashtagolofficial и https://atr42.ru/
fserges (2025-06-10 09:35:20+00:00): Ок. Нашёл такое изменение. https://www.mk-kuzbass.ru/social/2025/04/23/tashtagolskiy-rayon-preobrazovan-v-municipalnyy-okrug.html
osmer120311 (2025-06-10 18:39:00+00:00): Ориентируюсь на официальные источники: http://publication.pravo.gov.ru/document/4200202504250005
woodpeck (2025-06-06 21:54:57+00:00): If the Wikidata ID describes the trail as a whole then it should only be tagged on the relation that describes the whole trail. You have added the whole-trail wikidata ID to every individual section now which is wrong - only give wikidata tags to the individual sections if there is a wikidata item for that particular section.
ilias_ (2025-06-23 12:57:11+00:00): You seem to be adding oneway=no to all roundabouts you add. Why is that? Roundabouts are oneway=yes, or else we'd have some terrible accidents.
Jan van Bekkum (2025-06-24 13:31:23+00:00): It is apparently the default setting. I wasn't aware of that.  I didn't make any changes to the oneway setting.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-06-29 03:09:57+00:00): DWG revert - invalid deletion of names in different languages

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168249031
A67-A67 (2025-06-07 10:33:22+00:00): Hoi,
Hier gaan twee dingen fout in hoofdlettergebruik:
- ALDI wordt met hoofdletters geschreven, ook in lopende tekst. Zie website: https://www.aldi.nl/
- De correctie spelling voor AVIA XPress is met AVIA en de eerste twee letters van XPress als hoofdletters. Zie website: https://avia.nl/tankstations/avia-xpress-rijen

Ik heb dit hersteld.

De iD-suggesties uit de NSI bevatten helaas vaak fouten.
J budissin (2025-12-02 10:45:01+00:00): Bitte keine sorbischen Haltestellennamen ausdenken, das macht im Nachgang sehr viel Arbeit! Lieber abwarten, bis das Projekt abgeschlossen ist und die korrekten Namen feststehen. Danke!
BrummsLee (2025-12-02 15:22:26+00:00): Hallo J budissin!

Das hattest Du mir doch schon einmal geschrieben. Hab ich doch wieder irgendwo ne Haltestelle... 🤔​ ...sorry.
Welche Haltestelle meinst du genau?
J budissin (2025-12-02 15:48:04+00:00): Sorry für die Wiederholung, hab wohl beim letzten Mal ein bisschen was übersehen. An der Hummel und Carolagarten.
BrummsLee (2025-12-02 15:55:45+00:00): Ah ok., kein Thema.
Ich hatte mir das eigentlich auch hinter die Ohren geschrieben... 🫡​
Dir ne schöne Adventszeit!
Boris Verkhovskiy (2025-06-06 23:27:17+00:00): Is this real?
pedalhoppy (2025-06-09 15:50:49+00:00): It is not an official name but it is what people in the bike community call it, so by putting it in the hope is to make it more "real".
hoserab (2025-07-11 17:57:19+00:00): Hi pedalhoppy,

Respectfully, I wouldn't exactly call this name "common". Now I'm not a cyclist, but I've heard of and know where e.g. Sideshow Bob is. However, I've *never* heard the name "Shlooshway". I would tend to err on the side of tagging this as an "alternate name", using the key `alt_name`.

I was going to do so, but I noticed some path segments along the way were not tagged with the name, which made me wonder: what are the extents of "Shlooshway"? Does it just run from 1st Street SE to 12th Street SE? Would it be fair to presume that this relation (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18228641) is coincident with "Shlooshway"? If so, I would tag the *route* with this `alt_name`, not the path segments.
Comino (2025-06-07 10:15:20+00:00): Hi Bitcoin Amantikir,

In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes".

Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag !
Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead.

For more information please read : https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Merchants

Happy mapping,

Edwin
Comino (2025-06-07 08:04:15+00:00): Hi Peter,

It's me again! :-) Just making sure that you are doing the right thing.

By the looks of it, you’re a local who is checking all the addresses on BTCmap in your area. Wonderful, it’s important work, so thank you for that!

Regarding the use of the check date tags: If you physically (so in person) visit each shop, please use the survey:date tag.

If you only visit the company website and update data like opening hours, or add their website and/or Instagram account, then please use the check_date: tag.

If you physically visited the shop AND checked if they still accept Bitcoin, then please use both the survey:date tag AND check_date:currency:XBT.

The edits I make are almost always based on the forms we receive through our BTCmap website. 
https://btcmap.org/tickets

Since I always check the company website, I update both the survey:date AND check_date:currency:XBT tags. If I recently updated the company data and we receive a ticket from someone informing us that the merchant still accepts Bitcoin, then I ONLY update the check_date:currency:XBT tag.

Hopefully, this clarifies things for you.

Edwin
pjw1965 (2025-06-07 09:37:32+00:00): :thumps-up:
Syl (2025-06-08 15:30:01+00:00): Hello, there is a problem with the website link, real links looks like https://www.tesla.com/en_EU/findus/location/supercharger/xxxxxx. I fix this one, I'll let you fix the others.
stillhart (2025-06-08 15:54:41+00:00): My link works fine both on mobile ios and desktop firefox. It‘s makes you go through the language selection first. 

Where's your issue?
Syl (2025-06-08 16:35:03+00:00): Your link is a link to the map on Tesla website, it's not a link to the page about this charger.
And the link I addeed is shorter, according to the wiki: "Choose simple URLs over complex URLs if they point to the same content".
stillhart (2025-06-08 18:00:16+00:00): For me it opens the links to the tesla website with the information about that specific charger on a map. I noticed the displayed map on the other tesla pages is often wrong and misleading. I don't want that it's why I choose the map link.
Syl (2025-06-08 18:24:13+00:00): For me both links have the same location on the map.
OSM is already a map, why bother about how wrong are others maps? We just have to add the link that the tag "website" need, and here it's the shorter one that's needed.
Syl (2025-06-08 18:59:08+00:00): I found also a shorter link for this one: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12868304338
stillhart (2025-06-09 09:30:42+00:00): Btw, in case you interested, many superchagers still miss any website link, which I find quite useful.

You can find them with this overpass turbo query:

https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/25Jp
stillhart (2025-06-09 09:31:25+00:00): Another thing I still don't get. Supercharger or Superchargeur in france? Or should supercharger be in name:en ?
Syl (2025-06-10 08:30:27+00:00): I don't know how to name this in France, sorry.
I'm not interested in this type of object, I take care of this one because it's in my contribution area.
stillhart (2025-06-10 12:29:45+00:00): No problem, thank you anyway!
stillhart (2025-06-10 12:33:10+00:00): If you are local, you can add each charge point as man_made=charge_point (not amenity) and label it as tesla charger. And convert the supercharger to the correct area, may even add each parking space ☺️. 
Thanks again anyway 👍