piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Juke9573 (2026-04-10 07:00:10+00:00): Und danke für die Rückmeldung! Ich bin erst Seit ein paar Wochen am Mappen. Mit alle Feinheiten der unterschiedlichen Tags versuche ich mich noch vertraut zu machen.
Juke9573 (2026-04-10 07:27:30+00:00): Ich denke, wir sollten die Tore (zumindest vorübergehend) löschen. EveryDoor kann das allerdings nicht, weil sie noch in die Straße "verwendet" werden. Ich habe einen Fixme dran gehängt (das kann EveryDoor glücklicherweise), falls anderen vorbei schauen.
Senihtu (2026-04-11 09:12:50+00:00): Aus Fehlern lernt man. Ich habe auch viele Fehler gemacht. 
Die Tore sind jetzt auf die Parkgrenze verschoben. Mit dem iD (dem Editor im Browser) ging das problemlos.
Sieh Dir den auch mal an (es gibt da eine gute Einführung!)
weiter Freude am Mappen wünscht
Senihtu
Juke9573 (2026-04-11 10:20:29+00:00): Vielen lieben Dank!
iD steht absolut auf meine Liste, alleine schon weil einen Feldweg in der Nähe fehlt, die ich einzeichnen möchte. Aber eins nach dem anderen 🙂
Für den Einführung wollte ich mich die Zeit nehmen. Und ebenso viel Freude wünsche ich dir!
NeisBot (2026-04-09 17:54:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/10773680300 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Monitoring equipment installation company"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-04-17 22:33:13+00:00): 🤔 The text has been updated, though I’m not entirely sure it’s an improvement.
YomanNH (2026-04-09 20:50:56+00:00): Cześć, co się znajduje w tym miejscu? Biuro do którego można wejść i zamówić zrobienie strony internetowej, czy jest to adres rejestrowy firmy?
TechMateNetPL (2026-04-10 05:50:55+00:00): Cześć, w tym miejscu znajduje się blok a w nim prowadzę działalność w postaci usług programistycznych więc poniekąd jest tu zarejestrowana firma. Jeśli wcześniej się umówimy to możesz wpaść na kawę, a jeśli pytasz o ładne biuro i szyldy to nie ma, przynajmniej na razie.
tastrax (2026-04-10 09:54:59+00:00): No sign of any buildings in any imagery - does this actually exist?
sharkface (2026-04-12 00:23:08+00:00): A hospital does not exist at this location.
kingkingHK (2026-04-10 02:49:51+00:00): West Kowloon Corridor is signposted I think https://www.mapillary.com/app/user/kaartcam?lat=32.72446&lng=-117.171646&z=16&pKey=297862111823514&focus=photo&x=0.5191253197103024&y=0.6602385103586426&zoom=1.5505617977528092
Kovoschiz (2026-04-10 10:30:37+00:00): Sure. I didn't touch that though.
Kovoschiz (2026-04-10 10:44:17+00:00): Sorry, wrong filtering. Didn't realize it was downloaded.
user_5359 (2026-04-29 10:22:52+00:00): Hello! What is the mean of the key nonetwork? Did you mean no:network?
Kovoschiz (2026-04-29 19:59:11+00:00): I'm a promoter of `no:*=` , so yes  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182006049
jkoe (2026-04-09 20:02:17+00:00): Bei den Namen habe ich Zweifel ob das wirklich der Name sein sollte. Nicht jedes Objekt muss einen Namen haben.

Ich beziehe mich auf das "Names are not descriptions" Prinzip, s. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions

Zunächst zu dem DVAG Büro: Da bin ich der Meinung, dass das eigentlich nur eine Marke ist. Ja, der brand=* Tag fehlt, ich hatte nur brand:wikidata=* und brand:short=* hinzugefügt. Wenn überhaupt wäre der Name sowas wie DVAG Generaldirektion XX YY, aber das ist eigentlich auch wieder nur eine Beschreibung. 

Bei dem schreibwarengeschäft bin ich der Meinung dass Lotto Bayern definitiv falsch ist. Das ist ein Laden, der Vertriebspartner von Lotto Bayern ist. Vielleicht hat der wirklich keinen Namen, als ich den hinzugefügt habe, konnte ich zumindest keinen erkennen.
Was aber angemessen wäre, wäre lottery=yes + lottery:brand=Lotto Bayern + lottery:brand:wikidata=Q2324423
tim120 (2026-04-11 18:08:55+00:00): Die vorgeschlagenen Änderungen bzgl. des Schreibwarengeschäfts habe ich übernommen.
Der Kleinostheimer McDonald's besitzt sowohl die Brand als auch den Namen "McDonald's", also scheint das eine das andere nicht unbedingt auszuschließen.
jkoe (2026-04-11 18:23:47+00:00): Im Endeffekt ist es eine Frage dessen wie puristisch man sein will. Ich würde dazu tendieren, name=* wirklich nur anzugeben, wenn es ein "echter" Name ist, der sich nicht einfach nur etwas ist was brand=* oder operator=* ist. Am Ende ist das auch immer eine Abwägung, und auch ich habe schon name=* verwendet wenn man das eigentlich als unpassend argumentieren kann. 

Man kann da auch ganz schnell in ein "Mapping für den Renderer" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_map_for_the_renderer) kommen, auch wenn Renderer z.B. bei einem typischen Filialgeschäft einer Kette das brand=* wie einen Namen rendern können.

Dass der McD in Kleinostheim name und brand identisch hat, könnte gut einfach darauf zurückzuführen sein, dass früher der name sogar deskriptiv genutzt wurde. Am Ende ist es eine Grauzone, in der beides argumentierbar ist.

vgl. Diskussion im Community Forum: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/ein-benutzer-loscht-andauernd-meine-anderungen-und-antwortet-nicht-auf-nachrichten/119490/5
jkoe (2026-04-11 18:24:20+00:00): und danke für das anpassen des Schreibwarenladens! ich hätte das auch machen können, wollte es aber nicht einfach ohne Konsens ändern
felipeeugenio (2026-04-09 18:13:21+00:00): *Viña del Mar
felipeeugenio (2026-04-09 20:32:48+00:00): Hola. Puedes cuadrar los edificios con la letra Q. Asi solo haces un modelo y luego copias y pegas. Estos se notan que están hechos a mano.

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181112227
VicenteBarraFM (2026-04-09 23:19:08+00:00): Hola. Lo intentaré jejeje. Porque en general como que los edificios del condominio que mapeé, creo que por el lugar donde se encuentran (orilla de cerro), como que son medios en curva, entonces al tratar de encuadrarlos con la Q, como que no queda ni similar a lo que se refleja en la imagen aérea "Esri World Imagery" que usé.
felipeeugenio (2026-04-09 23:22:41+00:00): Hola. Son realmente curvos?
A veces en los sectores con más pendiente las rectas se ven como curvas. Me acuerdo que el viaducto del Malleco estaba como una curva. 
Saludos
VicenteBarraFM (2026-04-09 23:32:25+00:00): Al menos en terreno, como que no se ven curvos, son como rectos, pero viéndolos en detalle tienen una ligera curva. No sé si me explico jeje.
Igualmente aquí te dejo una foto de internet, de referencia del lugar, para saber si soy solo yo.
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/I6WXVnU1iAI/maxresdefault.jpg
felipeeugenio (2026-04-10 12:09:27+00:00): Me dejaste turnio. No sé ahora si son curvos o no. de la idea que son puras rectas, pero que en la hendidura del medio hay un ángulo.
En fin
NeisBot (2026-04-09 18:36:39+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 10 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1134403341 v3 | 4 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/10575561326 v2
https://osm.org/node/10575561327 v2
https://osm.org/node/10575561328 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=181112404
NeisReview (2026-04-17 22:34:00+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/181181730
NeisBot (2026-04-09 18:39:41+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 22 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1134403341 v4 | 4 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1134401052 v3 | 3 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1024408305 v3 | 12 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/1184602191 v7
https://osm.org/node/1184602197 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=181112561
NeisReview (2026-04-17 22:34:00+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/181130876
https://osm.org/changeset/181181730
Norbert Dichter (2026-04-10 13:59:15+00:00): Hello, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. Thank you for your contribution. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. Or just hit the Q-key.
Also please keep in mind: many buildings are very close but do not actually touch each other, try to map them close to each other without letting them connect or share nodes with each other, roads, or residential area outlines. In the iD web editor, holding down the "alt" key will keep nodes from "snapping" to each other and accidentally connecting.  Thanks so much for your contribution, Norbert 'Nodi' Dichter, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181112608
NeisBot (2026-04-09 18:45:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 14 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1134403341 v4 | 4 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1024408305 v4 | 10 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/10575561328 v3
https://osm.org/node/10575561329 v3
https://osm.org/node/10575561330 v3

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=181112728
Taksine (2026-04-10 07:27:12+00:00): 大傻春你在做什么？！！
Wildsharky (2026-04-13 11:58:15+00:00): Reverted of 181057292
eggie (2026-04-09 19:11:55+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback  Huis te Landelaan 4 bestaat volgen het Kadaster niet. Wanneer je meent gelijk te hebben doe dan een terugmelding richting Kadaster. Dat kan in deze hyperlink.
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/?searchQuery=Huis+te+Landelaan+4&objectId=0603010000026499&theme=BRT+Achtergrond&geometry.x=81526.00235691167&geometry.y=451448.0030843526&zoomlevel=16

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
NeisRevert (2026-04-10 04:45:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/181125752
where the comment is: "Revert political vandalism"
NeisBot (2026-04-09 19:03:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 7 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/372165772 v8 | 4 crossings
https://osm.org/way/142841358 v5 | 3 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=181113440
iandees (2026-04-09 19:27:45+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3756998042 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181114443, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
NeisBot (2026-04-09 19:06:17+00:00): 🌍 Welcome to OSM, Tefyisrael22.
Thanks for contributing!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

✅ Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added track road"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment
Dimitar155 (2026-04-09 20:05:20+00:00): За Minimart има шаблон в редактора. Изпуснал да му добавя варианта на кирилица, което ще оправя след малко. Само не знам кога ще излезе.

Поздрави,
Митко
Bienson (2026-04-11 18:26:57+00:00): Befinden sich am östlichen Ende zwei Zäune mit einer schmalen Lücke dazwischen, so wie nun eingezeichnet?
FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (2026-04-13 05:08:57+00:00): komisch. ist ergänzt.
Bienson (2026-04-13 23:09:24+00:00): Nein
joost schouppe (2026-04-27 14:29:44+00:00): It makes sense to add a prison tag on the entire protected area. However based on the name I would say this is not a prison at all anymore? So it should become disused:amenity=prison. You could change the building to building=prison, which is still likely true even if it is not used as a prison anymore
Sébastien Pi (2026-04-27 14:53:32+00:00): Indeed, it is currently not a prison (some parts should open again next year… let's say we are talking about that since its closure ~ 10 years ago!)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/746621330 area is still used.
eggie (2026-04-09 20:06:32+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback   Meestal worden gebouwen periodiek geïmporteerd vanuit de BAG. Ik heb de schuur nu even uitgelijnd mbv de BGT. 
Via het forum kun je ook nieuwbouw laten importeren middels het draadje BAG importverzoeken. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
iandees (2026-04-09 19:33:30+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6273100506 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181114670, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
NeisBot (2026-04-09 19:30:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13719377058 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Gym club"
---
Par exemple, une version plus neutre et factuelle de ton texte pourrait être : « Club de gym »
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
Tito_TheGhost (2026-04-10 08:24:46+00:00): How can I change the description?
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-10 11:50:00+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the description
eggie (2026-04-09 20:11:20+00:00): Dag Robin,

De format van de openingstijden klopte niet. Ik heb wat aangepast. De poi staat nu op een gebouw. Hoe kan een Kadaster-adres van locatie veranderen? 

MVG
eggie
Robin343 (2026-04-11 07:40:40+00:00): Beste Eggie,

De locatie moet zijn 19-1, ik heb de POI verplaatst omdat ik de vorige edit had gemaakt met de POI op de verkeerde plaats. Er heeft niet daadwerkelijk een verplaatsing plaats gevonden.
eggie (2026-04-11 07:44:34+00:00): Ahh. Oke.. maar nu zijn er zo te zien twee identieke adressen.
Die zou je kunnen samenvoegen.
Mvg,
eggie
eggie (2026-04-11 07:49:08+00:00): Robin,

Je info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode.  Spatie verwijderd uit de postcode.
Kijk even of die nu op de juiste locatie staat op het gebouw.

MVG
eggie
kamasytrix (2026-04-10 14:13:02+00:00): навіщо це?
mikita_paloika (2026-04-13 09:24:26+00:00): Hello, Oleksandr07! I'm reviewing some edits in this area. Could you please clarify the source for the name change here? 

I've updated the tags according to the Local names policy and removed the building tag from this feature as it doesn't appear to be a physical building on the ground. 

Thank you for your contribution! #mapbox_editing

Best regards,
Mikita
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181114748
demon_box (2026-04-10 09:02:19+00:00): Ciao claudio1483 Benvenuto in OSM! Ti segnalo che in Italia il civico identifica il punto di accesso (entrata) e NON l'intero edificio. Infatti un edificio può avere più entrate e quindi più numeri civici. 
Quindi hai 2 opzioni: 
1. Se conosci esattamente la posizione (entrata) del civico che stai mappando metti tutti i tags dell'indirizzo su un nodo del perimetro dell'edificio (aggiungendo anche il tag entrance sullo stesso nodo);
2. Se invece non hai questa informazione così precisa devi mettere tutti i tags dell'indirizzo su nodo adiacente ma STACCATO dal poligono dell'edificio.
N.B.: Taggare l'indirizzo senza il numero civico (addr:housenumber) ma soltanto "addr:street" coma hai fatto, è un dato incompleto e perciò inconsistente, inutile. Se non conosci anche il n° civico meglio non mappare nulla.
Ho già proceduto con le correzioni del caso. Grazie e BuonMapping!
claudio1483 (2026-04-10 09:56:38+00:00): Ciao demon_box, grazie per la spiegazione, mi scuso per l'errore
Dawid2849 (2026-04-10 16:04:16+00:00): To jest ulica Parkingowa, nie Parkowa
OSMaper_xD (2026-04-10 20:32:16+00:00): sorry
user_23884811 (2026-04-26 08:14:48+00:00): bkz: changeset/181630420
Rodrigo Rega (2026-04-09 19:54:12+00:00): Fixed addrs. Not added tumulus.
NeisBot (2026-04-09 19:57:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13602977708 v4

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Bar and grill"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisAgent (2026-04-09 22:33:59+00:00): 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again?
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-01 11:53:11+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags/values

https://osm.org/changeset/184909709
alexey_zakharenkov (2026-04-09 20:05:52+00:00): Покровка лежала одновременно в двух субъектах федерации - в Челябинской области и Башкортостане. Но это было неверно, она в Челябинской обл., а в Башкортостане с ней граничит село Первомайский.
NeisBot (2026-04-09 20:06:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/12757497974 v4

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "pop-up shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-04-17 22:33:16+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/181117773
NeisBot (2026-04-09 20:06:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/5321287865 v6

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Cafe"

#MapWithoutSpam
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-01 11:52:40+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags/values

https://osm.org/changeset/184909689
eggie (2026-04-09 20:15:58+00:00): Dag Wouter op een footway hoort geen foot=designated. Het is immers een voetpad.
Die tags zijn default.

MVG
eggie
wouternieuwerth (2026-04-11 19:27:09+00:00): Hi Eggie,

Dank voor de toevoeging. Ik had de instellingen overgenomen van het andere achterommetje ernaast. Weer wat geleerd.

Vriendelijke groet,
Wouter
eggie (2026-04-11 19:31:02+00:00): Yep.. zo begint iedereen. Niet eens zo slecht, maar soms zet het je op het verkeerde been.
Mapse,
eggie
demon_box (2026-04-10 09:00:56+00:00): Ciao claudio1483 Benvenuto in OSM! Ti segnalo che in Italia il civico identifica il punto di accesso (entrata) e NON l'intero edificio. Infatti un edificio può avere più entrate e quindi più numeri civici. 
Quindi hai 2 opzioni: 
1. Se conosci esattamente la posizione (entrata) del civico che stai mappando metti tutti i tags dell'indirizzo su un nodo del perimetro dell'edificio (aggiungendo anche il tag entrance sullo stesso nodo);
2. Se invece non hai questa informazione così precisa devi mettere tutti i tags dell'indirizzo su nodo adiacente ma STACCATO dal poligono dell'edificio.
N.B.: Taggare l'indirizzo senza il numero civico (addr:housenumber) ma soltanto "addr:street + addr:postcode" coma hai fatto, è un dato incompleto e perciò inconsistente, inutile. Se non conosci anche il n° civico meglio non mappare nulla.
Ho già proceduto con le correzioni del caso. Grazie e BuonMapping!
Everteal (2026-04-09 20:15:42+00:00): Oups, mauvaise note. Bonne note : https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5240321
NeisBot (2026-04-09 20:24:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13643788435 v5

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Cabinet maker workshop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisAgent (2026-04-09 22:34:00+00:00): 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again?
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-01 11:51:21+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags/values

https://osm.org/changeset/184909637
Frans S (2026-04-12 13:44:06+00:00): Thanks for mapping on this project.
Please do not map rectangular buildings as a round one. 
Square each rectangular building please.
Best regards and keep mapping