piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-11-30 14:11:21+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dtrade has some suggestions, https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/trade#values has some in use subtags...

Some are different then what would go into shop= value, some match

And well, there is https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Any_tags_you_like - so it is less about "invalid" and rather about "unnecessarily different from existing tagging for given thing"
aharvey (2025-07-08 02:20:57+00:00): hi Kyle, looks like you changed https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/1090861305 to highway=cycleway, I just confirmed it's still signposted as "bicycles dismount" and I can't see anything to indicate it's a cycleway (I think if there is a cycleway that has a small section as bicycles dismount it could still be highway=cycleway + bicycle=dismount, but I'm not sure if that's the case here). What was the basis for changing it from footway to cycleway?

The way originally split from https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/90252662 when in 2010 it was created with highway=footway + lcn=yes.

I'm not sure which route it's meant to be part of but I think based on the bicycles dismount signage and no other indication it's a cycleway highway=footway is a better fit.
❤️‍🔥 (2025-07-08 13:59:42+00:00): okay sure, I didn't put too much thought into this. Basically I saw the dismount sign and assumed it must be a continuation of the cycleway from the south, but you gotta dismount for this final section.

sooooo are there cases where highway=cycleway + bicycle=dismount would be valid? or does "dismount" imply "not a cycleway"? 

anyway I trust your judgement, just curious about how to interpret this
aharvey (2025-07-14 02:40:04+00:00): I'm not sure and I see what you mean as it is likely part of the bicycle route but apart from that it doesn't seem to have any other features that would indicate it's a cycleway or shared path, it looks and functions more as a walkway, so based on that I thought it shouldn't be highway=cycleway.

highway=cycleway + bicycle=dismount does have a bit of use which seems to be where cycleway is clear but there is a section where signage says to dismount.

The bridge stairs at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/153296507 would likely qualify for this but because they are stairs they are getting highway=steps instead.

Another example is at https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=301605831538676 where it's a shared path, the lane markings continue but the signs say to dismount, so in that case I think highway=cycleway + bicycle=dismount is correct (based on the fact that we tag shared paths as highway=cycleway).
mcliquid (2024-11-26 19:31:10+00:00): Ist der UFH wirklich mitten in der Wiese?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12376948774
Endres Pelka (2025-10-24 17:22:18+00:00): Cześć WieKo68, z jakiego źródła są te granice parafii? Na ile są precyzyjne?

Zrobiłem małą edycję w Luboniu i na krótkim odcinku scaliłem granicę parafii z administracyjną: https://www.osm.org/way/1443932297
Teraz towarzysz Yog Sot w dyskusji pisze, że popsułem Twoją pracę...
eggie (2024-11-26 21:22:26+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Filip009 (2025-01-02 21:07:50+00:00): Zdravím, netreba vytvárať duplicity, stačí bod (ten uprednostňujem napríklad aj ja) alebo informácie na ploche budovy https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/161413133 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12392544135 Takto sú tam v podstate 2 rovnaké objekty. Odporúčam ti jeden z nich vymazať.
Milan Batovsky (2025-01-08 05:19:19+00:00): Dobry den
Upravil som objekt iba na budovu a nechal tam znacku kamenarstvo
Filip009 (2025-01-08 05:38:30+00:00): Vďaka :)
Dawid2849 (2024-11-26 19:54:08+00:00): źródło: http://www.s7warszawa-grojec.pl/multimedia/odcinek-b-2
streckenkundler (2024-11-26 20:13:40+00:00): Guten Abend,

...erinnerst du dich? Du hast mehrfach eine klare Ansage der DWG bekommen...

https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16897

streckenkundler
Hufkratzer (2024-11-27 20:30:33+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1338094572 is not a horse race course, it is a horse riding arena and should be tagged leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian, example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/849028887
GinaroZ (2024-12-01 12:20:43+00:00): Hi, just wondering what the reason is for adding foot=yes to all these footways?
CrysMelyn (2025-01-13 12:47:39+00:00): hi, there are some third party apps who use foot tag data, so I've been adding it where it applies for the sake of these applications.
GinaroZ (2025-01-13 17:05:22+00:00): Thanks for the reply. Could you give some examples of these apps and how they use the foot tag data? Because surely the default position on foot access on highway=footway is yes - otherwise it wouldn't be much of a footway!
Jordi MF (2024-11-26 21:53:32+00:00): Se han revertido todos los changesets de este usuario porque es un usuario bloqueado decenas de veces con cuentas múltiples (https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/usuarios-editando-en-espana-bajo-sospecha-vandalismo-malas-practicas-y-otros/2510/), por lo que sistemáticamente incumple los Términos de Uso de OSM (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenStreetMap_account#Account_Names_and_Multi_Account_Policies y https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Terms_of_Use#VI._Account_cancellation_or_suspension).
El usuario realiza múltiples y pequeñas ediciones para dificultar que sus cambios puedan ser revisados.
Este usuario (con sus multicuentas) está mapeando únicamente según las ortofotos y sin tener en cuenta el conocimiento local (probablemente usa fotos a pie de calle sin permiso) e, incluso, elimina PDIs con todo el historial de forma injustificada. Con sus cuentas, sigue eliminando etiquetas name:ca de lugares en los que se habla catalán.
Ante todo lo expuesto y por las diversas anomalías, revierto todos los changesets porque, de revisar cada uno de ellos, únicamente nos dedicaríamos a ello, como si fuésemos administradores. En caso de revisar todas las ediciones de este usuario que ya ha sido bloqueado por 10 años con otras cuentas, nunca podríamos seguir mejorando la base de datos debido a revisar durante horas cada uno de los conjuntos de cambios y, por lo tanto, dejaríamos de lado seguir mapeando para añadir nueva información.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159635998
mcliquid (2024-11-26 21:42:55+00:00): "couplings" gibt die Anzahl (2) an, "couplings:type" die Art (B;B).

Bitte lesen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:emergency%3Dfire_hydrant#Optionale_Merkmale
NeisBot (2024-11-27 05:08:51+00:00): Hello, and welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and changesets, particularly those concerning the names you've added or modified.

It seems that some of these names are a bit unusual.

#NameCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-11-29 07:16:27+00:00): No response so far ...
trigpoint (2025-10-13 15:18:15+00:00): Hello
I am puzzled as to why https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1338100284 is on layer -1?

Cheers Phil
citrula (2024-11-27 01:40:00+00:00): I was able to see the name "Hutto Draw" on FRA maps (which is the source it was added from) as well as the US DOT NBI map. I don't know where that name came from, but it isn't on any of the other common sources for waterway names.
kaleidoscopica (2024-11-27 14:08:15+00:00): Hmm indeed, this helps, thank you! It makes more sense to leave it as is so I'll add it back. How were you able to tell the source it was added from? I often have difficulty tracking down edit history... something I need to understand better.
citrula (2024-11-27 16:05:22+00:00): In https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159349255 the editor kindly listed their sources, and I was already familiar with the NBI dataset so I took a look there. In general, the source changeset tag is a good place to start, because it's automatically populated by most editors.
woodpeck (2024-11-26 21:36:09+00:00): Dear Joey Kempe, please don't use the catch-all "Multiple" as a changeset comment. Especially when deleting lots of features, try to write a few more words about what you changed and why.
mweper (2024-11-28 23:31:50+00:00): Hola Patodiez. Revisando tus cambios, me encontré que en Coronel Arnold ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4213746 ) podría estar rota una relación de landuse=residential.
Por favor, revisala para corregirla.
mweper (2024-11-30 13:46:42+00:00): Disculpas, ya lo corregí.
rskedgell (2024-11-27 05:48:33+00:00): (Review requested)

Looks fine to me, thanks.
Fjana (2024-11-30 15:42:29+00:00): Zdravím. Koleje, které označujete jako koleje seřaďovacího nádraží v Plzni na hlavním nádraží jsou aktivně využívány osobními vlaky stejně jako ostatní koleje na nádraží. Můžu se zeptat, jakým klíčem se řídíte?

Z dobrého důvodu jsem přidal k často měněným kolejím na Hlavním nádraží note, který jste zřejmě přehlédl.

Pro příklad:
Koleje 1, 6 a 7 bývají využívány pro spoje linek P4 a R25 na sever, koleje 8 a 9 pro spoje na Rokycany a pro linku P22, kolej 12 pro spoje vedoucí směrem k Nepomuku a kolej 3 pro některé spoje vedoucí směrem na Stod a Domažlice.

Prosím, případně přidejte zdůvodnění Vašich změn
detective-fiasco (2024-12-01 16:47:32+00:00): Dobrý den, 

na cesty, které obsahovaly Vaší poznámku, jsem se snažil dávat vlastní poznámku vysvětlující, proč jsem použil `service=siding`.

Souhlasím, že tyto koleje jsou používány pro mnoho osobních vlaků. Tag `service=siding` s tím však není v rozporu.

Ve stanicích Jako `usage=main/branch` označuji koleje, které jsou přímým (často z hlediska očíslování) pokračováním nějaké traťové koleje.

Jiné dopravní koleje označuji jako `service=siding`, což je právě případ kolejí 1,3,6,7,8,9,12 (podle značení informačního systému pro cestující, tj. nejspíše Vámi použité číslování) resp. 8,4,3,5,106,104,103 (podle značení SŽ).

Manipulační koleje pak zpravidla označuji jako `service=yard`.

To odpovídá těmto klíčům:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:%C4%8Cesko/Zna%C4%8Den%C3%AD_kolejov%C3%BDch_trat%C3%AD#Koleje

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Key:service#%C5%BDeleznice
Violaine_Do (2024-11-27 05:14:18+00:00): Super, Mauruuru roa!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159635660
BCNorwich (2024-11-27 06:41:18+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Does the Norwich Aviation Centre occupy the whole building as your amendment implies? If not then the business should be mapped as a node within the building. The website address implies the business is within the Airport Park & Ride Building.

Regards Bernard.
Dbob0921 (2024-11-27 15:26:32+00:00): Hi,

It definitely operates the whole building.

Best Regards
David
VictorIE (2026-06-16 15:06:26+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1338123779/history

You had a note on this, suggesting you didn't quite know what it is.

It's a (mostly-underground) sewage pumping station. Sometimes a location is too far from the treatment plant or at a lower elevation, so they pump it the sewage to a point from which it can then flow downhill. So, yes sewage - under pressure!! That why there are 'non-return valves' ('NRV' on the marker posts).

They may be paired with a stormwater tank to reduce overflows. 

Sometimes they will be fenced off: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/820480293/

Sometimes they will have actual buildings instead of technical cubicles: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/102437864

And, sometimes they're huge: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/370707971
VictorIE (2026-06-18 13:20:09+00:00): What started with me looking at various unusual tags (not:area:highway=*) made me fall down a rabbit hole and: https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=52.6596344&lon=-7.2443019&zoom=19
danieldegroot2 (2026-06-18 14:37:58+00:00): The only noteable thing here is they support showing cars actually driving on the left since about a month
https://core.f4map.com/changelog
(the above may not contain all changes)

A derived list of supported tags is at
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/projects/f4

It does not seem relevant to this changeset though ;-)
rskedgell (2024-11-27 05:46:07+00:00): (Review requested)

Unfortunately you dragged a point on Harper Road out of position, which is why the editor warned you about crossing highways before you uploaded it.

Please also use a meaningful changeset comment and a real source - "あ" is inadequate.

Reverted.
rskedgell (2024-11-27 05:39:08+00:00): (Review requested)

Unfortunately, you dragged the NW end of Collinson Walk so that it appeared to pass through two buildings and join Stones End Street near its junction with Great Suffolk Street. This is why the editor displayed warnings before you uploaded your edit.

Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159643072
BCNorwich (2024-11-27 06:49:20+00:00): Hi, I wonder if you could help, are there fences around every aircraft? As I recall from a long time ago there were no fences.

Regards Bernard.
Dbob0921 (2024-11-27 15:28:05+00:00): I don't believe so.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-11-29 00:43:04+00:00): This changeset deleted a highway.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159637177
pb-mapping (2024-12-03 20:44:24+00:00): Thank you for catching this. My apologies!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159637177
HellMap (2024-11-27 10:26:29+00:00): Paldies par sazīmēšanu.

Gribēju tikai piebilst, ka Bing ortofoto in neliela nobīde, dažviet pat pāris metri. Tā kā visi pieraduši no LGIA/LVM ortofoto zīmēt, tad iespējams jau aizmirsies, ka tā mēdz būt ;) Es šeit nedaudz visu nobīdīju.
Hufkratzer (2024-11-27 22:51:31+00:00): Hi,
du hast innerhalb https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/707989865 (Reit- und Fahrverein Legelshurst), die als Reitanlage (leisure=horse_riding) getaggt ist, mehrere kleine Reitanlagen gemappt. Das ist nicht sinnvoll; eine Reitanlage kann Reitplätze, Ställe, Gebäude, Paddocks und andere Dinge enthalten, aber keine anderen Reitanlagen, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure=horse_riding

1. Der Knoten https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12377370694 ist überflüssig, damit wird die Reitanlage doppelt gemappt, was nicht sinnvoll ist, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Ein_Objekt_in_der_Realit%C3%A4t_entspricht_genau_einem_Objekt_in_OSM%E2%86%99 . Wenn an der Fläche irgendwelche Tags falsch sind, kannst du die ja da an der Fläche korrigieren.

2. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1338128272 könnten Paddocks sein, könnte man dann mit https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:landuse=animal_keeping taggen

3. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1338128264 sieht aus wie ein Reitplatz, wäre in dem Fall mit eisure=pitch + sport=equestrian zu taggen

4. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1338128273 sieht aus wie ein Roundpen oder Longierzirkel; wäre in dem Fall wie ein kleiner Reitplatz zu taggen

5. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1338128277 : keine Ahnung, was das ist, aber eine Reitanlage im SInne von https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure=horse_riding ist es nicht
Matthias1172 (2024-11-28 08:26:40+00:00): Danke für die Infos.
Habe Korrekturen vorgenommen.
Sollte jetzt passen.
citrula (2024-11-27 01:07:51+00:00): This highway segment was marked as razed in 2022. Is it back now?

Also, you accidentally dragged a power line node and attached it to a highway.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159637753
hhrazaka (2024-12-06 15:57:53+00:00): Bonjour,
Si on choisit aussi le nom "Groupe scolaire Jules Isaac" pour le contour, cela  donne ceci sur osmose : "Objet présent deux fois comme chemin et comme relation". Comment faire ?
Baloo Uriza (2024-11-27 14:27:01+00:00): Found the path on bing streetside in the iD editor and got it to a state where the StreetComplete app could add any missing tags when surveyed in the area.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159638238
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-12-02 03:15:24+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtrunk
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159638253
dval (2024-11-27 04:12:32+00:00): Как сейчас проехать с севера на юг, если двусторонка упирается в oneway=yes?
dval (2024-11-27 04:15:59+00:00): Думаю, вам стоит удалить тот вэй, который вы нарисовали от северо-западного линка до места, где дороги разделены физ. разграничителем.
SomeoneElse (2024-11-27 01:18:57+00:00): The Esri imagery currently shows construction ongoing, but construction is basically complete.  Despite that, it's still useful for locating features.  The rest has been drawn by eye from roads and paths.  More needs doing, especially when the basins are full (it'll only be possible to see what is where once they are - everything is just "undulating farmland").
dval (2024-11-27 04:00:57+00:00): Hi Жан-Клод Ван Далл! Местами вы внесли правки, как мне кажется, не по делу. Линк в РФ определяется по менее важной дороге (это к тому, что снизу направо). Также не стоит рисовать два вэя там, где между направлениями нет физического разделителя. А начиная от севернее моста до некоторой точки южнее, как показывают снимки, такого разделителя нет. Также валидатор редактора JOSM говорит, что есть серьезные ошибки в рестрикшинах. Возможно, они возникли после ваших правок. Также форма моста скорее всего должна быть прямоугольной.
SomeoneElse (2024-11-27 01:32:26+00:00): Also a kitchen shop on Blossom Street
Taya_S (2025-01-24 14:13:27+00:00): Hi,

What were you trying to do here? From what I'm reading (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dutch_Harbor_Naval_Operating_Base_and_Fort_Mears,_U.S._Army) this used to be a military base that has long since been demolished. Right now it doesn't seem these buildings exist anymore, and they're certainly not medieval forts.

Sincerely,
Taya
☆Finvenkulo (2024-11-27 22:58:54+00:00): Nazwa (klucz «name») powinna być zgodna z tym co jest na ziemi, ewentualnie powinna być w lokalnym języku. Zostało to opisane na wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name#Multiple_names

Polska znajduje się na kontynencie europejskim, więc nazwa powinna być również w języku polskim.

Proszę wycofać swoją błędną edycję.
ZeLonewolf (2024-11-28 00:42:41+00:00): Please discuss with the community before making further changes, see:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16924
mcliquid (2024-11-27 08:25:06+00:00): Ich hab hier building=church wieder ergänzt.
alamero (2024-11-27 09:03:03+00:00): Merci!
Hufkratzer (2024-11-27 21:34:19+00:00): Hola,
¿por qué has cambiado building=yes por leisure=horse_riding enhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1338142537? Parece como si allí hubiera un edificio; tal vez sea el tejado del picadero cubierto, que puede verse en https://www.centroecuestrebellavista.com (fotos) y que estaba simbolizado por https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7005956376. ¿Qué sentido tiene etiquetar esta pequeña zona como centro ecuestre? El centro ecuestre es sin duda más grande. Aquí un ejemplo de un centro ecuestre: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1282083000
Ver también: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a#Riding_centre_(equestrian)

Traducción realizada con ayuda de la versión gratuita del traductor DeepL.com
mcliquid (2024-11-27 08:20:15+00:00): Hi, ist das keine Kirche mehr? Falls nein, würde ich "denomination" auch noch entfernen. Und "building" soll den ursprünglichen Bauzweck abbilden, also auch wenn in diesem Gebäude jetzt eine Autowerkstatt wäre, ist es trotzdem noch "building=church".
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/118841000
alamero (2024-11-27 09:02:22+00:00): Ah, klar doch ist das eine Kirche. Hatte den Tag aus versehen entfernt, ist gefixt!
tastrax (2024-11-27 10:47:02+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, +61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features#Phone_Numbers .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:11:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
TonyJC (2024-12-07 16:49:48+00:00): Buenas, estoy corregiendo un error que cometistes. Tomastes el building:part y lo convertistes en un building regular, basicamente duplicando el mismo edificio. En OSM uno solamente tiene que trazar la silueta del edificio para que aparesca en el mapa, y los building:part(s) son para usar programas de tercer partido que forman el edificio en 3D.
felipeeugenio (2024-11-27 11:53:52+00:00): Hola. No hacemos pruebas editando directo en el mapa. Además mapeamos cosas verificables en terreno. por favor considerar eso.
gracias
pitscheplatsch (2024-11-28 10:11:16+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159655584
phoenixsaigon1698 (2024-11-27 04:14:27+00:00): Liệu rằng Tommy_HoangLong sẽ dạy cho sinh viên của anh ta là, chúng mày sẽ phải chửi người khác ngay khi thấy họ khác ý với mình, chửi rủa thật mạnh vào thì mới chừa. 
Hay là anh ta mắc một chứng bệnh mặc cảm tự ti khi những gì anh ta làm không được ai công nhận, không được ai biết tới. Chỉ có OSM là nơi còn tương đối tự do, thoải mái, không ai biết ai là ai thì anh ta tự cho rằng anh ta là kẻ cầm cân nảy mực, là quan tòa phán xét. :)))))
Tommybara (2024-11-27 05:48:25+00:00): Ở đây chả liên quan gì đến chuyện "khác ý" hay không khác ý. Mà cụ thể là ban đầu map nó đang đúng, có người nhảy vô sửa thành sai --> đủ để kết luận là vandalism/phá hoại. Thế nào là đúng, thế nào là sai thì đã chỉ ra rành rành, và chỉ ra bằng văn bản, nghị quyết của nhà nước đàng hoàng chứ chả có phải ý kiến cá nhân của ai cả. Định nghĩa này của phá hoại nó đơn giản, được công nhận rộng rãi quá mà có gì khó hiểu?

Còn quan tòa phán xét á? Người phán xét sẽ là các admin, sẽ là các mapper khác. Và họ sẽ thấy rất rõ ai mới là người đang chửi ai, họ cũng sẽ nhìn vào xuyên suốt các comment từ đó đến giờ để thấy rõ ai là người khơi cái văn phòng hằn hộc trước.
phoenixsaigon1698 (2024-11-27 05:54:34+00:00): Làm nghiên cứu khoa học đi kết tội người khác, cứ ném văn bản, ko so sánh được trước sau khác nhau như thế nào mà bay vô chửi vandalism. Khoa học kiểu gì vậy tiến sĩ Long?
RedGreenBlue09 (2024-11-27 14:46:20+00:00): 1. Tự chửi bản thân ko biết nhột
2. Không đưa ra được bằng chứng mà vô chê văn bản của người ta :))
https://namtuliem.hanoi.gov.vn/thong-tin-quy-hoach/-/asset_publisher/gwKr7rGLBN5Q/content/ke-hoach-su-dung-at-nam-2024-quan-nam-tu-liem
phoenixsaigon1698 (2024-12-03 08:35:46+00:00): Ê tao thấy lại thấy vui rồi. Mày rảnh quá đúng ko RGB09, kiếm được cái link của gov.vn thì đúng rồi, nhớ dạy thằng bạn Long của mày thay vì ném cho tao cái link duan24h.net thì ném link GOV.VN nhé . 

Còn tao hả, tao tự chửi bản thân tao mỗi ngày vì vẫn còn chưa hoàn hảo để vẫn để 2 thằng mày bắt lỗi là vandalism đó :))

Tiện mày nhớ tìm hiểu thêm, ranh giới các phường của Cầu Giấy hơn 1 năm trước là không có. Tao dùng Vietbando, QGIS và cả ảnh vệ tinh để vẽ những nét đầu tiên đấy. 

Mốt tao đi đến đâu, tụi mày nhớ đi đến đó giám sát nha.
Tommybara (2024-12-03 10:02:32+00:00): Duan24.net chuyên đi sưu tầm mấy bản đồ đã được bên UBND các quận huyện duyệt và ký. Nó nằm chình ình dưới góc phải mà còn méo thấy, nên thôi đi vẽ tầm bậy cũng thông cảm. Duan24.net ít ra nó còn đỡ hơn cái trang diaocthongthai, cái trang mà t mới vô tình tìm được https://diaocthongthai.com/ban-do-quan-bac-tu-liem-tp-ha-noi/ và cũng là vô tình khi mà đường địa giới Phú Diễn - Cầu Diễn với Phương Canh - Tây Tựu bị vẽ bậy hôm trước nó giống y chang trong link này.