piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NorthCrab_upload (2023-12-16 23:50:31+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184995704
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184995571
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184993511
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184992741
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184992994
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184993631
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184995294
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184993117
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184995674
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184997076
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184995649
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184992825
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184992055
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184993074
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184992561
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184996656
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184995630
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184993831
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184993698
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184989721
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184995608
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184995732
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184992912
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184992655
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184993550
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184994828
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11423753354
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184996230
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/293205767
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100351499
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/293205644
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/293205657
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/293205914
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/293205919
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/293205923
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100351526
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/293205798
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/293205804
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100351280
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100351537
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100351412
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/293205689
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/293205819
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/293205692
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/293205820
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100351428
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/293205845
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/293205595
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/293205854
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/293205857
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/293205602
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/293205860
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/293205869
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100351344
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100351351
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/293205752

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
vJack (2023-12-17 00:16:40+00:00): Nie lepiej te podjazdy zrobić jako service=driveway?
NorthCrab (2023-12-17 08:28:29+00:00): Lepiej :-)
WTGZ_ (2023-12-17 23:05:09+00:00): Tak chyba jest dużo lepiej z adresami
NorthCrab (2023-12-18 10:05:39+00:00): Wielkie dzięki WTGZ_ !
rskedgell (2023-12-17 13:11:45+00:00): Thanks for updating this.

You could also change highway=path (where routers have to guess access) with highway=footway, which implies foot=yes and everything else=no.
Kiss_Karoly (2023-12-17 04:54:28+00:00): Mielőtt valaki szóvátenné.... Egy megszakított feltöltés következményeként a 4801. sz. autóbuszvonal hibásan került fel. 2023.12.19-én javítom.
ivanbranco (2024-01-30 13:18:54+00:00): Ciao Simone,

il commento del changeset é "Via Cavour è a senso unico dal semaforo fino all'intersezione con via Isonzo. Non tutta la via."

peró hai mappato come senso unico tutta la via, non solo la parte fino a via isonzo. É un errore?
Simonemaps (2024-01-31 21:50:41+00:00): Si non ero capace a selezionare solo quel tratto. Riuscirebbe lei? Grazie
Simonemaps (2024-01-31 22:00:00+00:00): Lo stesso anche per via Isonzo da intersezione con via Cavour fino intersezione con intersezione via Vittorio Veneto è a senso unico. Solo quel tratto. Grazie
TomPar (2023-12-17 02:39:51+00:00): Per typical OSM mapping norms, "roads" inside cemeteries should be mapped as "service" as they are not part of the regular road network. If you disagree, please provide more information to support your recent change. There has been OSM community discussion on this topic recently. Thanks.
streetsurvma (2023-12-17 18:09:45+00:00): Hi Tom, NKrun mentioned you reached out similarly, we are working together on it.  We edited them back to service roads.  Thanks.
AntMadeira (2023-12-17 15:07:52+00:00): Olá, meioserrano.
Espero encontrar-te bem.

Podes explicar a espécie de rotunda que criaste neste changeset junto ao hospital de Tomar?
É alguma rotunda nova ou é outra coisa que estás a tentar representar?

Cumprimentos,
António.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145201987
meioserrano (2023-12-18 00:35:53+00:00): Olá António, é uma rotunda nova sim, essas edições de facto deviam estar com o 'corrige-me' porque foram feitas a olho, sem imagens novas. Mas tenho outras formas de verificar localização, como gps tracks de outra plataforma.. 
Mas sim, está tudo um bocado tosco )))
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145201987
AntMadeira (2023-12-18 17:20:41+00:00): Ok, eu dei uma ajeitada na rotunda.
Para que seja uma rotunda, tem de ter sempre a etiqueta junction=roundabout.
Aconselho-te a ler esta wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Tag:junction%3Droundabout

Deixei um fixme para mais tarde se ajustar o traçado.

Abraço,
António.
topolusitania (2023-12-18 19:18:52+00:00): Lembro que o iD tem uma ferramenta que com um mínimo de três pontos desenha círculos perfeitos. 😉 TL
meioserrano (2023-12-20 01:10:36+00:00): ehehe.. eu tinha ideia que tinha feito aquilo depressa de mais, mas agora tenho a certeza😅
obrigado pela ajuda
OxidizingMap (2023-12-17 01:34:07+00:00): non-existent*
WoodWoseWulf (2023-12-17 19:37:11+00:00): Hi Kdaa22,
You've duplicated a lot of features that are already on the map in this changeset. Typically OSM works on the idea of "One feature, one OSM element"
DaveF (2024-01-09 01:09:54+00:00): Please don't delete data which is still relevant. Use the 'disused:' prefix if closed.

Although the pub still appears to be open.
https://www.facebook.com/p/The-Waldegrave-Arms-East-Harptree-100083455774267/
mikedld (2023-12-17 10:36:15+00:00): Hi ImRodry and welcome to OSM! For any further changes, please specify information source which helps a lot when verifying correctness and legality of your changes; see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source for more information and (non-exhaustive) examples. Note that I'm talking about changeset tag (not node/way/relation tag) in particular. Thanks a lot, happy mapping ;)
TomPar (2023-12-17 02:36:55+00:00): Per typical OSM mapping norms, "roads" inside cemeteries should be mapped as "service" as they are not part of the regular road network.  If you disagree, please provide more information to support your recent change.  There has been OSM community discussion on this topic recently.  Thanks.
StreetSurveyor (2023-12-17 02:51:28+00:00): Thanks for letting me know. I was unaware of the discussion to make them service.
TomPar (2023-12-17 02:55:26+00:00): You're welcome.  And some more detail: I think they've always been service, and I recently asked the community on Slack, and a few experienced mappers confirmed.  That's what I meant by "discussion".  Thanks.
tastrax (2023-12-17 23:13:56+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
tyfi (2023-12-17 04:26:51+00:00): Large bbox because five sparse areas were touched
deven_smith_ (2023-12-21 19:42:33+00:00): Hey, welcome to the Spokane OSM area. When you make a changeset, can you say what changes you made instead of "made updates"? Like, "updated businesses in Airway Heights". It helps us know what you did or didn't do.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-14 13:31:14+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11424963978/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-07-08 17:19:52+00:00): hello!


can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4845115 ?
joel56dt (2023-12-17 19:42:51+00:00): My mistake. Thanks for fixing this.
vng_me (2023-12-20 13:59:40+00:00): Looks like you did the wrong node move here. Strange highway intersections.
Abulfazl Safdari (2023-12-21 05:03:16+00:00): just I Zoom this place, I didn't edit here. please remove or undo this edit.
Xvtn (2023-12-18 15:10:38+00:00): Hi, thanks for your contribution! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes. Everything looks good to me. Thanks again!
fred_k (2023-12-28 08:43:58+00:00): north-east half of the service road 1230804640 does not exist or being left unusable, between nodes 11424975404 and 11424975402 even this section appears on current GSI map. This service road terminates near 11424975404 into foothpath 800276452.
thomaps-jp (2023-12-30 03:05:26+00:00): ご連絡ありがとうございます。昨日確認しに行ってから直しました。
※普段は図化為で民有地に入らないが、ちらりと入りました。
arjunaraoc (2023-12-17 10:59:46+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Resolved by reverting vide https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145210272
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145204744
arjunaraoc (2023-12-17 10:48:55+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check the update https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145209906
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145204882
gscholz (2023-12-17 08:09:46+00:00): Hi Manfutu,
can you please contribute to my questions regarding your edits, e.g. here:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145115623

Kind regards
Guido
welzheimerwald (2024-01-14 21:24:14+00:00): Bitte https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:place%3Dtown in Zukunft beherzigen
osmdees (2024-01-15 05:54:09+00:00): Konntest du seitingen-oberflacht in der amtlichen Städteliste nicgt finden? Bitte noch einmal nachschauen.
BubbaJuice (2023-12-19 04:31:29+00:00): Forgot to say I used street-level imagery from iD.
Supaplex (2024-05-29 04:15:57+00:00): Revert due to it being a fake bus station

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151969960
silversurfer83 (2023-12-18 20:37:57+00:00): Gude :)

ich möchte dir einen kleinen Tipp geben, der Deine Arbeit noch besser werden lässt:
Die Taste "Q" macht ein ausgewähltes Objekt, wenn schon Eigenschaften vergeben sind, sauber rechtwinklig. Gerade bei Gebäuden sehr praktisch. Probier es doch hier im Neubaugebiet einmal aus.

Grüße und weiter viel Spaß an der Karte
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145205712
NorthCrab_upload (2023-12-17 08:50:32+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/293220317
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/293220322

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
WieKo68 (2024-06-11 04:07:09+00:00): poprawiono
Udarian (2023-12-19 22:38:22+00:00): again busses are the only form of traffic allowed on these ways so this commit is incorrect
Udarian (2023-12-19 22:30:59+00:00): this is incorrect, busses are the only vehicles aloud on ways 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/807636696
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/807656900
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/807636695
so they are busways.
1998alexkane (2023-12-20 11:25:23+00:00): Not all bus-only roads are automatically highway=busway. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=busway#Similar_infrastructure - "Any section of bus-only roadway that only leads into a bus station should be tagged with highway=service + access=no + bus=designated."
Udarian (2024-01-28 05:51:00+00:00): Then there is not use for highway=busway, because highway=busway and  highway=service + access=no + bus=designated mean the exact same thing. Since it seams to be down to preference (since they mean the exact same thing with not distinction between the two) it is preferable that highway=busway be used in Miami.

it makes no sense to use both tagging's in a since town/city, use either all busways use highway=busway or all of them use highway=service + access=no + bus=designated . if you want to use highway=service + access=no + bus=designated then you should update ways such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/42507785 to use that tagging . consistency in tagging within a region matters allot. when tagging is consistent, new contributors can figure out what the best ways to map features by just looking at what has already been fully mapped. it also helps ensure that different areas with different customs and preferences remain consistently well mapped (both tagging and geometry) by following standards set by the local community. 

so again please remove the highway=service + access=no + bus=designated on this and other way or remove the highway=busway on other ways in Miami Dade county and replace it with your preferred tagging. there is also the fact that highway=busway is the what the community uses since the iD tagging schema has that as the tagging added to a way if added as a "busway" and the ways modified in this commit are busways without a shadow of a doubt.
1998alexkane (2024-01-30 09:23:10+00:00): For better or worse, the community voted that the separate value (highway=busway) should be used for BRT corridors as they are distinct from service roads (and BRT corridors don't meet the definition of highway=service). See the proposal for details of why this distinction was made: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Tag:highway%3Dbusway

Bus station access roads were specifically excluded from this (when they are not part of a BRT corridor) as they can meet the definition of a service road (access to a property).
oruk09 (2023-12-17 10:18:09+00:00): 해당 건물의 정확한 편집이 필요합니다
Lokai (2023-12-19 17:44:50+00:00): Hallo,
du hast ein Stück Land an der Auffahrt zum Schafhof als farmland kartiert. Hast du das Stück Land vor Ort in Augenschein genommen? Außerdem ist die history verloren gegangen. In den letzten beiden Wochen bin ich dort mehrfach vorbeigekommen. Farmyard ist das nicht.

Außerdem kannst du dir vorstellen in Zukunft weniger highways mit Flächen zu verkleben?

Gruß

Lokai
user_17551983 (2023-12-20 10:40:48+00:00): Es gibt keine flächenhistorie, weil das stück bisher nur leeres inner vom wald war, das du am 3.dez angelegt hast. Du hattest nur haus, aber weder nutzfläche noch zufahrt eingetragen. 

Wenn du da sooft vorbei kommst, warum hast du das nicht gleich selbst komplett gemacht?  

Beim nochmal anschauen ist es kein landwirtsch. materiallager, sondern eher ein privates baustofflager im vorhof von einem etwas verwilderten gartenstück.
privater garten passt da besser.
mfg
os-emmer (2023-12-21 19:51:45+00:00): Hallo Walzpfanderer,
du hast hier ein Gebäude mit addr:country=DE57 eingetragen. Ich vermute, dass ist ein Tippfehler. Was heißt denn die "57"?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1231876200
user_17551983 (2023-12-22 08:05:47+00:00): danke, ist korrigiert. war wohl copy+paste fehler vom nachbarhaus.
user_1566574 (2024-03-15 22:07:53+00:00): Bonsoir M. Picaud,
Bienvenue sur OpenStreetMap et merci pour vos contributions !
N'hésitez pas si vous avez besoin d'aide pour la cartographie, n'hésitez pas à me contacter, et/ou m'informer de l'avancement/fin des travaux, m'envoyer des photos, (voire m'accueillir sur site !).

Je suis le contributeur un peu fait le suivi des travaux jusqu'à présent, et je retournerais sur Frasne à l'occasion.

Merci à vous !
Allison P (2024-02-08 08:06:33+00:00): Something about this challenge that causes the "Eeast" typo...
TheSwavu (2023-12-19 02:20:06+00:00): Hi Bob, 

I am assuming that you didn't mean to make https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1231879907 one way? From your photo https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=878799566983387&lat=-36.207699027085&lng=150.12371552343&z=17&focus=photo it still appears that it is two way.
bob3bob3 (2023-12-19 04:57:47+00:00): Yeah interesting one that I worried about for a while. There is a no left and no right turn into it from Princes Hwy and only a reserve (no driveways) back to the next intersection north. One could only U or 3 pt turn if it was wide enough. Part of my decision was also about the fog (white) line being continuous. Sixmaps/DCS was quite old at that point and the fogline was dotted then.

Had to do a head swivel to check the northbound turn restriction as the left/rear camera only cuts in below 38kph.

Short answer is there will never really be any northbound traffic on that section of Centenary Drive. Dunno if it would be legislated one way or not though. Eurobodalla Shire was also against RMS restricting the turn off from Princes with a guardrail back in 2019 https://www.beagleweekly.com.au/post/2019/06/26/council-says-no-to-proposed-closure-of-access-from-princes-highway-into-centenary-drive-a

The competition also has the rest of the road one way on the other side of the bay too. I wasn't there of course.

Your call?
TheSwavu (2023-12-19 08:40:23+00:00): I left it as one way and removed the superfluous turn restrictions.
Langlaeufer (2023-12-17 20:11:45+00:00): Hi Klaus, ich denke an der Kraftfahrstraße kann man sich die Radwege auch sparen.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145210853
rskedgell (2023-12-17 13:15:44+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thank you for adding this.

An alternative way to tag this might be as tunnel=building_passage, depending on how the road goes under the building.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tunnel%3Dbuilding_passage
Michael154 (2023-12-17 13:38:58+00:00): Thanks for the welcome. You're right that building_passage is appropriate, and I've submitted another change. There's certainly more work needed on this block which I'll maybe try another time.
MichS (2023-12-23 08:52:12+00:00): Hallo,

welche Namensquelle können Sie für spring angeben?

MFG
M
eggie (2023-12-17 12:22:23+00:00): Dag Michel Eigen Weg wil niet zeggen access=private
Dat doe je wel bij art 461 wvs.
Hier kun je beter access=permissive taggen als er een bordje staat Eigen Weg.
Dat is niet per definitie Verboden Toegang.
De weg wordt ook doorkruist door een wandelroute. 
Graag wat info welke bebording.


MVG
eggie
Michel_Re (2023-12-17 12:33:54+00:00): De weg en de wandelroute zijn niet toegankelijk. Er is inderdaad sprake van een blauw bord met art 461 (verboden toegang). En er staat een hek voor.

https://www.google.com/maps/@51.8311337,5.9380172,3a,90y,52.27h,73.46t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sVb4EDer-OfOHC1Nb2mcTlA!2e0!5s20230801T000000!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu

Dat geldt voor de verbinding tussen de Alde Weteringweg en het wandelpad naast de waterweg (Het Meertje).
eggie (2023-12-17 12:43:01+00:00): Oke.. In dat geval is het juist getagd met access=private  Het hek zou je ook nog kunnen intekenen op een node met barrier=gate access=private

Mapse
eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-12-17 18:21:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145224831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some pro-Russian vandalism in Ukraine
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-12-17 18:21:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145224831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some pro-Russian vandalism in Ukraine
Jordi MF (2023-12-17 12:42:42+00:00): Hola RotBlau,
Gracias por mejorar OSM. ¿Estás seguro que aquí hay un puerto o un collado? Debe de tratarse de un error. He estado en esta zona y se trata de un camino bastante llano. Además, el mapa topográfico del IGN muestra claramente que no hay ningún puerto.
Elimino la información. Por otra parte, no hay que escribir nombres descriptivos como "Sin nombre". Se deja en blanco el campo para el nombre.
Saludos!
Jordi
RotBlau (2023-12-17 12:50:14+00:00): Hola Jordi,
acabo de montar en bici ahí - desde Villalonga a Lorcha y aunque esté ahí muy plano por unos cien metros es el punto más alto entre Villalonga y Lorcha y de ambas aldeas sube mucho (y bastante empinado también). Si este no es un puerto o collado entonces p.ej. el Col d'Aubisque en los Pirineos franceses tampoco sería uno.
Saludos
Jan
Jordi MF (2023-12-17 13:09:31+00:00): Ahora lo entiendo. El nodo del mountain_pass debe de ir unido a la carretera. Luego lo añado. Sin embargo, comparar el Col d'Aubisque, que requiere un buen esfuerzo en los ultimos metros, con este tramo que no tiene ni nombre, me parece desproporcionado jajajajja. Lo dicho, en seguida lo recupero.
RotBlau (2023-12-17 14:33:17+00:00): Jajaja, sos ciclista?
Si subes al Aubisque de Arrons es muy relajado....Pero con esto me refería más a que de hecho el puerto que queda algo más al oeste es más alto y para ir ahí del Aubisque bajas quizá unos 100 metros...Y este tramo ahí en Villalonga tenía unas buenas rampas de entre 15-22 por cientos :-)
Jordi MF (2023-12-17 18:17:49+00:00): Sí, pero este tramo lo hice andando. Además, tampoco lo hice todo, solamente a partir de la mitad y hacia Villalonga. Supongo que no anduve por esas cuestas del 15%. Tendré que volver y hacerlo. Ya he recuperado el puerto, pero sin nombre.
Saludos.
vJack (2023-12-17 14:08:17+00:00): To jeszcze resztę miasta tak przerobić i będzie git :). Btw, jak coś to w Słupsku polecam ortofotomapę WMS zamiast WMTS. Więcej widać na zbliżeniu i aż się miło na to patrzy.
mike140 (2024-10-08 21:01:48+00:00): Якщо на цю дорогу нема заїзду, можливо варто зробити її пішохідною?
Trostianchanyn (2024-10-14 08:55:13+00:00): Ви про яку саме дорогу?
mike140 (2024-10-14 09:01:00+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/213860560
Trostianchanyn (2024-10-20 15:43:54+00:00): Виправив. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158134130
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-12-17 18:21:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145224831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some pro-Russian vandalism in Ukraine