piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Jon Snow 47 (2024-03-22 10:05:28+00:00): This user Bestboy is adamant of adding a proposed city from Wikipedia to be part of the map. Which is vandalism and has caused confusion for bolt drivers

Vandalism tag; Changeset: 148890831

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148890831#map=12/5.5519/5.7391

I commented that it is not a real city but an imaginary city which the state government have declared them terrorist for trying the cause war in Warri in the name change campaign but the user still won’t change their mind. 

https://www.asabametro.com/oborevwori-receives-olu-of-warri-pledges-to-engage-fg-to-revitalise-delta-ports/

https://www.vanguardngr.com/2024/01/no-wado-city-in-warri-stop-the-slogan/amp/

If everyone is allowed to put a proposed city, state or country in the maps all because they have a Wikipedia page for it. It will cause chaos in the maps and confusion that may lead to accidents for drivers.

The governor of delta state said "People talk about Warri; Warri today has expanded beyond the main town. Even today, people call Osubi, Warri. I don't know why people want to make trouble. "Warri today is a general name. I am from Osubi but when you ask me where I am from, I will tell you Warri. So, Warri is Warri and nobody can change it." 

You can read more of the governors statement here https://bigpenngr.com/2024/02/14/gov-oborevwori-meets-olu-of-warri-speaks-on-attempted-renaming-of-parts-of-warri/
Taya_S (2024-03-22 17:22:24+00:00): @Jon Snow 47 If you want the DWG to intervene then you can mail them at data@openstreetmap.org where you explain the situation.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Data_Working_Group
Jon Snow 47 (2024-03-23 14:14:58+00:00): I mailed them already they are working on it
Xvtn (2024-03-20 22:32:12+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Since you requested a review, I looked over your change here. Looks great! Thanks for providing a source/explanation. If you feel confident enough, you could also add the new business that replaced it. (But that's not required, of course.)
Let me know if you have any questions, and thanks for your contribution to the map!
Xvtn (2024-03-20 22:29:06+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes here. Looks great to me! I understand natural=scrub to generally mean "Shrubby plants, maybe some wild grasses, and trees whose growth is stunted." Something like this: http://fc07.deviantart.net/fs71/i/2010/243/1/b/scrubland_stock_2_by_humblebeez-d2xp3an.jpg

However, the definitions aren't really strict and it can depend on the context, unfortunately. If not scrub here, perhaps natural=wood would be the next best thing.

Let me know what you think. Thanks for your contributions!
Xvtn (2024-03-20 22:29:56+00:00): More info on the OSM Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dscrub
alexey_zakharenkov (2024-03-20 18:49:49+00:00): Здравствуйте.

Откуда у вас информация об именованном переулке в этом месте? В ФИАС ничего такого нет.
Администрация Верх-Чикского сельсовета (2024-03-21 02:48:53+00:00): переулок Подгорный, ошибка в слове.
alexey_zakharenkov (2024-03-21 11:10:43+00:00): Откуда у вас данные о наличии здесь именованной улицы?
Администрация Верх-Чикского сельсовета (2024-03-21 12:50:38+00:00): на основании документов на собственность. Данный участок оформлен в собственность администрации как автомобильная дорога переулок Подгорный. Возможно в фиас не добавлена информация.
alexey_zakharenkov (2024-03-21 13:24:50+00:00): Спасибо за ответ.

Порядок слов в названиях улиц в OSM определён соглашением https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Россия/Соглашение_об_именовании_дорог

в соответствии с которым правильно будет "Подгорный переулок", как и "Подгорная улица".
Администрация Верх-Чикского сельсовета (2024-03-22 03:14:51+00:00): хорошо, название поправим.
alexey_zakharenkov (2024-03-20 17:42:04+00:00): Здравствуйте.

Прошу обратить внимание на порядок слов в записи улиц:
"Школьный переулок",
но "переулок Чапаева"
alexey_zakharenkov (2024-03-20 17:45:12+00:00): Не надо удалять дорогу, чтобы нарисовать на этом же месте почти такую же. Это противоречит правилам OSM. Надо просто подправить геометрию уже имеющейся линии.
alexey_zakharenkov (2024-03-20 17:46:52+00:00): Правильно "Партизанский переулок". Исправьте, пожалуйста.
alexey_zakharenkov (2024-03-20 17:54:26+00:00): Здравствуйте.

Название "с. Свердловское, по переулку от ул. Ленина, 28 до ул. Ленина, 30-б (ОВП)" и подобное - это не название дороги. Удалите, пожалуйста, тег name у этой и подобных дорог.
empty_child (2024-03-20 09:44:09+00:00): Good afternoon siradze_zn,
I ask again why you split this street? What's the reason?
empty_child (2024-03-20 09:46:25+00:00): Reverted (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148901943)
CurlingMan13 (2024-03-20 05:39:43+00:00): As mentioned previously, do not partially overlap areas...
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148892462
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-27 13:58:56+00:00): Thank you for mapping.  Could you please add also the changeset comment and the building is not mapped properly. Happy Mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148893105
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-06-19 21:44:13+00:00): Why should these not have the water hazard tag?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#Features_within_a_golf_course
CurlingMan13 (2024-06-19 21:51:56+00:00): Realistically, the only ones that should are the ones within the golf course.

Named lakes generally are tagged as lakes and not water hazards.

For example, Force Lake is a lake, and not just a water hazard.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/93893873

The water treatment plant also should not be tagged as a water hazard.

In many cases, golf mappers remove natural=water to add golf=water_hazard.  All bodies of water should be tagged with natural=*.
alexey_zakharenkov (2024-03-20 17:58:38+00:00): Здравствуйте.
Не надо полностью заключать в кавычки название заведения. Однако часть названия может быть в кавычках: Центр писихологической помощи "Всё будет хорошо"
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-06-05 14:42:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152291681 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some peak names in Vitosha, Bulgaria.  See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/some-peak-names-in-vitosha-bulgaria/112544/6
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-06-05 14:42:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152291681 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some peak names in Vitosha, Bulgaria.  See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/some-peak-names-in-vitosha-bulgaria/112544/6
SomeoneElse (2024-04-22 21:37:31+00:00): Hello mountainguide55, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
What is the source of the name tag change on 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7897681837/history ?  The name you've used looks similar one that previous contributors thought wasn't correct.
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2024-04-22 21:37:53+00:00): Здравей, mountainguide55 и добре дошъл в OpenStreetMap!
Какъв е източникът на промяната на етикета с име
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7897681837/history? Името, което сте използвали, изглежда подобно на това, което предишните сътрудници са смятали за неправилно.
С Най-Добри Пожелания,
Анди
mountainguide55 (2024-04-23 13:23:41+00:00): Hi Andy,
Like most peaks in Bulgaria this one is also named by locals. If someone has different opinion for the name it's better to show where it's written the peak is with another name instead of pretending there's no peak at all (there's a peak and with almost perfect panoramas from the center of the mountain and everybody deserve to go there and see it instead of keeping the peak hidden from people like former collaborators try to do)
SomeoneElse (2024-04-26 14:26:46+00:00): Plenty of peaks in plenty of countries don't have any sort of name at all.  Sometimes there's an "official" naming process and sometimes there isn't, but sometimes there is no name at all.
alexey_zakharenkov (2024-03-20 18:00:45+00:00): Здравствуйте.

Хорошо, что Вы вносите новые дороги, но то, что вы указываете в теге name - не названия дорог. Скорее всего эти дороги безымянные. Почистите, пожалуйста, теги name.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-06-05 14:42:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152291681 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some peak names in Vitosha, Bulgaria.  See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/some-peak-names-in-vitosha-bulgaria/112544/6
mavl (2024-04-04 13:19:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149570218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15918].
MxxCon (2024-03-20 17:58:37+00:00): Hello.
If it's named Baptist Church, why is denomination protestant?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148894278
DurgeshSinghChouhan (2024-03-20 20:40:00+00:00): Hi, I apologize, it's a mistake. I didn't pay full attention to the name of the church. Thanks for your comment, I have corrected it.

You can check it here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/357611479

Thanks!
woodpeck_repair (2024-04-29 22:52:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 150683754, 150683768 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable edits by user who did not reply to any changeset comments
nevw (2024-03-20 09:58:47+00:00): EdAny reason that you have group these two together in the one tag instead of tagging separately as they were previously tagged. They seem to be seperate entities to me and would normally expect to be tagged seperately.
nevw (2024-03-21 08:01:49+00:00): This shows where the bench was originally mapped ...
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=148894491
 I think this was done accidentally and I have reverted in this changeset
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148947351
Xvtn (2024-03-21 15:25:35+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Just want to say thanks for your contributions to the map. Everything's lookin great!
alexnder (2024-03-20 12:51:55+00:00): De ce ai pus access=no pe Tiberiu Olah? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1010764380  Ăla se folosește atunci când există un semn de interzicere al accesului, e cazul aici?
Andreiul_03 (2024-03-20 18:03:50+00:00): Ok, mersi de info! Am vrut sa ridic restrictia de "under construction". Am sa selectez alta optiune.
hatul (2024-10-31 20:03:49+00:00): לדעתי כדאי להפריד את החניון והברז לנקודות נפרדות. מה דעתך?
zstadler (2024-10-31 22:16:18+00:00): אם אתה יודע איפה החניון ואיפה הברז, תפריד.
המעורבות שלי היתה בעיקר החלפה של
tap
ב
drinking water
zstadler (2024-10-31 22:17:13+00:00): הפרדה שלא מבוססת על מיקום היא בעצם
Map for the renderer
...
hatul (2024-11-03 11:24:36+00:00): הפכתי את החניון לשטח לפי תצ״ל והפרדתי את הברז
opendcc (2024-03-20 07:40:54+00:00): Hallo,

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:genus:de und bei Maßen ist m default und wird ohne Einheitenbezeichner gemapped.

Servus
alexey_zakharenkov (2024-03-20 18:41:48+00:00): Добавлять тег addr:city - бесполезная работа. Здания находятся в городе, у города есть полигон границы. Принадлежность здания городу следует из геометрии.
alexey_zakharenkov (2024-03-20 18:44:35+00:00): У этого здания:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1125544698

пропал тег building и оно пропало с карты как здание. Правильнее обвести территорию садика и теги садика (amenity, name) повесить на неё, а на здании оставить теги здания (addr:*, building).
alexey_zakharenkov (2024-03-20 18:18:46+00:00): Здравствуйте!

Вы вносите полезную информацию, только не надо удалять существующие объекты, чтобы нарисовать точно такие же. Это противоречит правилам OSM.  Вместо этого корректируйте геометрию имеющихся линий. 

Также, пожалуйста, для прямоугольных объектов делайте спрямление углов.
mavl (2024-04-04 13:19:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149570218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15918].
burrscurr (2024-04-01 10:20:57+00:00): Hi Schmarni,

wegen review=requested ein paar kleine Hinweise: Um ein Ferienhaus o.Ä. einzuzeichnen ist es oft sinnvoll, einen neuen einzelnen Punkt in der Mitte des Gebäudes einzutragen, zum Beispiel mit tourism=guest_house (ob dieser Tag gut passt, kannst du im Wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:tourism%3Dguest_house nachlesen). So sind die Tags des Gebäudes (z.B. die Art des Gebäudes, die Anzahl Stockwerke, ...) von denen einer bestimmten Nutzung (also z.B. die Nutzung als Ferienhaus) getrennt.

Dir weiter viel Spaß beim Mappen und Danke für deinen Beitrag zu OSM!

VG burrscurr
burrscurr (2024-04-01 10:22:26+00:00): (Falls das gesamte Gebäude ein Gästehaus ist oder vermietet ist, kann es auch sinnvoll sein, die tourism= und weitere Tags am Gebäudeumriss zu belassen.)
utteringmute (2024-05-27 06:28:19+00:00): Buildings are aligned and squared correctly.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148895683
alexey_zakharenkov (2024-03-20 18:53:24+00:00): Здравствуйте!

Не надо вешать теги магазина и на здание, и на точку внутри, а то получается два магазина. Я бы здесь оставил только здание.

"Магазин фруктов и орехов" - это не имя собственное, так что удалите, пожалуйста, тег name. Часто такие магазинчики и не имеют своего названия. Для вывесок есть тег inscription. Для описания - тег description.
burrscurr (2024-04-01 10:35:11+00:00): Hi Schmarni,

wegen review=requested ein paar kleine Hinweise:
Im Bereich des Sportplatzes, den du eingetragen hast (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11747357339#map=19/50.88624/14.00485) gibt es schon einen Sportplatz, nämlich https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/485715260#map=18/50.88556/14.00639.  Ich denke, in beiden Fällen ist der selbe Fußballplatz gemeint. Um doppelte Einträge zu vermeiden, wäre es sinnvoll, den schon vorhandenen Sportplatz in seiner Lage zu korrigieren (das eigentliche Spielplatz ist deutlich kleiner, die vorherige Erfassung ist nicht gerade ideal) und in etwa an die Stelle zu verschieben, an der du den (dann überflüssigen) Punkt gesetzt hast. Wenn du den "alten" Spielplatz verschieben willst, kannst du ihn im Editor auswählen und mit "d" von den angrenzenden Flächen entfernen. Dann sollte die Entfernung der überflüssigen Punkte und Lagekorrektur einfacher sein. Falls du Probleme oder Fragen hast, gib einfach Bescheid. 

VG burrscurr
Vinber-Pro (2024-03-20 13:47:42+00:00): hi,
it's very very large ? Too large no ?

regards
mcliquid (2024-03-20 14:21:00+00:00): Checking the wiki, it is too large :)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
dpaschich (2024-03-20 15:52:56+00:00): Thanks to both of you - I don't know how this happened like this, but I've reverted it.
sahilister (2024-03-23 06:09:13+00:00): Hello aaru_swartz, 
slight suggestion, in this changeset "Kendriya Vidyalaya"/school as an area has been already mapped, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/973587051. Ideally buildings area is mapped and information like name and other stuff is added to encompassing area, rather than each individual building. 

Happy Mapping, cheers!
sahilister
Vivek Dumre (2024-05-23 17:02:52+00:00): Good accurate mapping, keep contributing.#OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148896223
silversurfer83 (2024-03-20 08:12:40+00:00): Gude Dirk :)

wenn ein Gebäude(komplex) so grß ist, dass er mehrere Adressen umfasst ist es nicht so günstig, eine Adresse auf den Gebäudeumriss zu legen und die zweite Adresse als Punkt (node) im Gebäude zu lassen.
Da wäre eine Erfassung am Gebäude als "addr:housenumber=1-3" ODER die Erfassung über zwei eigene Punkte, wie es vorher war, besser.

Details zu den diversen Möglichkeiten bietet auch das Wiki unter
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Adressen

und bei Fragen bitte immer raus damit :)

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contact_channels#Chats.2Fmessengers

happy mapping
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148896275
Dirk Menne (2024-03-20 08:43:59+00:00): Hallo silversurfer,

Hausnummer 3 ist eine Einliegerwohnung, daher hatte ich mich so entschieden ;)
Aktuell ist jedoch der Eingang zu HNr. 3 dort, wo jetzt die 1 ist. Und die 1 ist auf der Nordseite. Das sollte schon geändert werden, oder?

VG Dirk
silversurfer83 (2024-03-20 08:49:54+00:00): Danke für die schnelle Rückmeldung :)

ja. Wenn die Eingänge, die mit den Hausnummern korrespondieren bekannt sind wäre das natürlich die beste Lösung: Dort, wo der Eingang ist einen Punkt auf dem Umriss des Gebäudes erzeugen, "entrance=*" nach diesem Artikel hier erzeugen
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:entrance
und dort auch die Adresse eintragen.

cheers
derloris (2024-10-17 19:04:23+00:00): Hallo! https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4482944 In Patsch hast du 
 zahlreiche Straßen auf "access=destination" gesetzt (was für alle gelten würde, auch Rad und Fußgänger), wobei es sich laut eingetragenem Verkehrszeichen nur um "motor_vehicle=destination" handelt und für Rad und Fußverkehr somit keine Einschränkung wäre, so war es davor auch eingetragen. Die Changesets nennen als Grund nur "Berichtigung". Hat sich vor Ort an der Erlaubnis seit dem urspürnglichen Eintrag etwas geändert. LG
Road–Runner (2024-10-27 18:30:11+00:00): Hier ist noch alles so wie ichs damals eingetragen hab, bin heute zufällig vorbeikommen.

@gj_TIR: Bitte weiter aufgliedern, ob auch Autos nichtmotorisierte Fahrzeuge usw. fahren dürfen, sonst wirds für alle gesperrt. Wie zb hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148896764
Road–Runner (2024-10-27 18:36:00+00:00): Das Bild zeigt die Aufgliederung und hilft vlt etwas weiter. ;-)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access

LG 
RR
Baloo Uriza (2024-11-14 17:58:01+00:00): Please take a look at the Getting Started guide on wiki.openstreetmap.org before continuing.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148896616
NeisBot (2024-03-24 12:40:42+00:00): Hello Meryem akh, thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.Please see https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments \n
Thanks!

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
aharvey (2025-02-08 11:21:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162275655 due to use of proprietary data.
GeoAndi (2024-03-20 10:16:50+00:00): Hallo bitfix,
steht da wirklich nur ein kleines Schild mit "landwirtschaftlichen Verkehr frei", weil das ist ziemlich selten der Fall, oder gibt es da noch ein übergeordnetes Schild wie z.B so eins: https://de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bildtafel_der_Verkehrszeichen_in_der_Bundesrepublik_Deutschland_seit_2017#/media/Datei%3AZeichen_250_-_Verbot_f%C3%BCr_Fahrzeuge_aller_Art%2C_StVO_1970.svg
Dann wäre das vehicle=agricultural.
Näheres steht auch auf dieser Wiki-Seite: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:access=agricultural?uselang=de

Viele Grüße, GeoAndi.
bitfix (2024-03-20 12:07:11+00:00): Hallo andi, 

danke! Hab's neu angepasst:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148909034

Viele grüße
Georg
GeoAndi (2024-03-20 12:24:09+00:00): Perfekt, danke.
Viele Grüße, Andreas.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-23 09:43:32+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11747434798/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
mol_an (2025-05-12 15:46:20+00:00): Hi, seems to be a concrete building in the woods, probably a transformer substation (electronic). There's also a fire prohibition sign next to it. Need to investigate further during a future hike to the location...
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-23 16:51:18+00:00): building is mapped already - is this amenity=fixme object needed/useful?
Carto'Cité (2025-03-05 16:28:02+00:00): Bonjour.
Merci pour l'ajout des informations sur les escaliers et escalators de la gare de Metz.
Une précision : la valeur du tag level doit être un ou plusieurs nombres, comme indiqué sur https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:level. J'ai donc remplacé level=départ;arrivée par level=0;1
Cordialement,
Antoine de Carto’Cité pour SNCF Gares&Connexions.
michel60 (2024-03-22 18:35:55+00:00): Bonjour,
Je ne sais pas si cela vient de là, mais la continuité des lignes de bus est passée en défaut ...
Outils de vérification :
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=2.82839&lat=49.40968&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.94&overlays=ptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid
Mise à jour toutes les 13 heures ...
Si c'est en noir, c'est en défaut ...
Cordialement Michel
osminng (2024-03-25 10:14:14+00:00): Bonjour Michel,

Désolé pour ce problème. J'ai essayé de vérifier les "relations" lorsque le changement de géométrie a été effectué, mais ce petit problème subsistait alors. Merci de l'avoir corrigé !
michel60 (2024-03-26 08:05:07+00:00): Bonjour,
Merci pour votre réponse.
Cordialement Michel
mavl (2024-03-20 14:34:29+00:00): Здравствуйте. Дом № 5 по этой улице уже есть.  Вы были на месте и видели этот адрес?
utteringmute (2024-05-27 06:34:45+00:00): Great work in adding features and tag details.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148898046
eggie (2024-03-20 11:04:51+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-03-20 11:11:18+00:00): De NS wandelroute was nu onderbroken, want je had het pad verwijderd. Ik heb de routering omgeleid.
MVG
eggie
jahefkjhskdjfhshgdf (2024-03-20 14:33:40+00:00): Hallo Eggie, dank. Die was me ontschoten. Relatie busroute was ook verbroken bij de rotonde was ook verbroken maar inmiddels hersteld.
eggie (2024-03-20 14:49:30+00:00): Mooi...  👍
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-06-13 12:59:50+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11747460678/history has fixme:type = fix that was added in this edit
what should be fixed here? do you need help with selecting better tags?
habi (2025-06-18 19:17:19+00:00): Most probably related to https://github.com/Zverik/every_door/issues/880
The user should probably have made an OSM Note that a https://www.suone.ch is missing.
habi (2025-06-18 19:52:49+00:00): I've extended the waterway in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167797936 and removed the `fixme:type=fix`
Vivek Dumre (2024-05-23 17:04:47+00:00): Good mapping, but it would be better if you could just add a short changeset comment about the added feature .#OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148898566
woodpeck (2024-03-20 08:59:45+00:00): Dear aleksandra991, when adding new street names please specify the data source so that other mappers can ensure you are not using copyrighted material.
aleksandra991 (2024-03-20 09:38:19+00:00): ок
tekim (2024-03-20 14:11:54+00:00): Are you removing because of poor quality, or because of licensing issues?  Google Buildings are explicitly allowed to be used in OSM, see https://sites.research.google/open-buildings/#open-buildings-faq

If you are doing this for quality reasons you might want to redraw by hand at the same time you are deleting.
_Ahsan_Sarwar_ (2024-03-21 01:34:55+00:00): I was doing for quality reasons. Sure, I'll keep in mind to redraw while deleting.