piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mini-me (2023-01-04 22:57:29+00:00): Информация о транспортной сети и название станции отлично находятся через отношение stop_area.
В name записывается название или идентификатор ВЫХОДА, т.е. либо текст с этих указателей https://ic.pics.livejournal.com/m_zarya/41527344/2167/2167_600.jpg, либо номера лестниц, как на сайте метрополитена.
Мы с вами уже это обсуждали. Прочитайте наконец вики. Я специально для вас оставил ссылку.
По текущей схеме выход обозначается так же, как и вход. Если вам это не нравится - создайте обсуждение на форуме / напишите пропозал, а не занимайтесь вандализмом.
Dinamik (2023-01-04 23:20:55+00:00): То, что некоторая информация теоретически может быть определённым образом извлечена из отношения, не даёт права удалять её. Пример: улица, на которой расположен дом, может быть определена из отношения, в которую дом включён, но из этого не следует, что нужно удалять улицы, прописанные на домах вручную: какие-то приложения могут без проблем импортировать информацию из отношений, какие-то используют адресные теги, указанные в явном виде на зданиях, какие-то могут формировать адреса по включениям в полигоны - информация может вноситься в информацию разными способами, не обязательно лишь одним из возможных. Информация о транспортной сети и названии может быть указана и через отношения, и в явном виде. Вы считаете необходимым теги удалять - поясните, пожалуйста, для каких целей это делается. Разъясните, пожалуйста, каким образом из отношений должны подгружаться номера вестибюлей в Вашей схеме с удалёнными тегами?
На сайте метрополитена приведены и названия станций, и нумерация вестибюлей (1-2), и нумерация лестниц (1-12) - пожалуйста, не удаляйте информацию о них. Если Вы считаете нужным отметить указатели и их содержимое, это тоже можно сделать, но не не нужно удалять другие данные.
mini-me (2023-01-05 00:19:09+00:00): Есть иерархия объектов. Вход является частью станции, станция - частью сети. На каждом уровне должен быть свой набор данных. Если какое-то приложение не умеет работать с отношениями, то это не повод дублировать информацию с верхнего уровня на нижние.
Ваши примеры - это устоявшиеся и описанные в вики схемы. Как и схема мапинга метро. И она не предполагает network, color и прочее на входах.
У вестибюля может быть несколько выходов и каждый со своим номером или названием. Но, если они не известны, то можно вписать туда что-то вроде «Московская-2».
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:04:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:06:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:07:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:03:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:05:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:06:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:04:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:04:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:03:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:08:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
Diacritic (2023-01-04 02:03:53+00:00): Hi Stevo,

In this edit, I can see that you have split the Calder Highway into a dual carriageway in several sections.

Roads should only be split into separate carriageways if there is physical separation - such as a physical barrier or median.

These changes should be reverted as they make the map less accurate and make lane mapping more difficult.

Dian
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130848125
heyitsstevo (2023-01-04 03:10:56+00:00): Hi Dian,

Under Victorian road rules, painted traffic islands are treated for the most part as physical barriers. Mapping each direction of the carriageway separately reflects this separation, and would restrict routing software from presenting illogical routing options (e.g. allowing U-turns along divided roads).

Please be mindful when reverting changes of this scale that you don't inadvertently damage route relations, as you did to bus routes through Maiden Gully.

Cheers
Diacritic (2023-01-04 03:38:27+00:00): Hi Stevo,

Firstly, apologies for the problems introduced with the bus routes in Maiden Gully. iD isn't great with relations.

I am aware of the restrictions to driving over painted traffic islands in Victoria. However, these painted traffic islands do not constitute a physical barrier and the ways should remain combined. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Dual_carriageway

The traffic island tag can be used to indicate the presence of traffic islands, and the change, turn, and placement keys allow for the specification of lanes and their nature. I'm not aware of routing software that would offer a u-turn on a single carriageway road; do you have an example you would be able to share?

Only mapping ways as separate when there is physical separation is a well established editing convention, both locally and globally, that is fundamental to the way roads are represented in OSM. 

I'd encourage you to engage with either the mailing list, discord, or community page for more information as to why this consensus exists.
CRCulver (2024-01-25 04:10:01+00:00): At 32.74944, -117.08726, you added a northbound left-turn secondary_link. Bing imagery shows that that northbound secondary_link doesn’t connect to 50th Street. Please check this and, if the imagery you were using was out of date, please fix (while preserving the additional tags I added to the secondary_link).
pitscheplatsch (2023-01-06 06:18:15+00:00): Hi.
Should be reviewed by the local community. Thanks.
Zandu (2023-11-16 21:02:51+00:00): Not an import. Hand drawing forests from Bing Imagery.  Tags were moved off ways and onto relations to minimize overlapping ways.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130849850
Josef73 (2024-02-13 17:23:01+00:00): Hello, is Bruno's Sculpture Garden (1126830721) the whole week open or only Sataurday & Sunday? Thanks
Ewen Hill (2024-02-14 10:07:51+00:00): I think its open loosely most days when Bruno is around. It's a pretty fluid thing
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:40:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
Mashin (2023-01-04 11:35:03+00:00): Ups.. that dragged a whole road. 
Fixed here 130862747
andrewsuzuki (2023-01-04 14:42:17+00:00): Thanks!
andrewsuzuki (2023-01-04 16:04:10+00:00): I just caught myself doing it twice again...I upgraded JOSM yesterday and I think some key or mouse binding must've changed, but I'm not sure what it is!
Mashin (2023-01-04 19:32:59+00:00): In this case it seem to have been 'rotation'. 
On Mac it is activated with Cmd+ shift + drag (on PC should be ctrl + shit + drag) . I also have a feeling that they changed some of the key shortcuts.. 
You can change them in preferences
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:16:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:18:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:46:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
Zandu (2023-11-15 05:20:00+00:00): Updating old railroad tags where the railway no longer exists.  Not invalid...just valid.  Local survey conducted.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130850372
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:25:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:42:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:36:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
Jbah (2024-02-03 22:01:36+00:00): Hi, is the parking ticket shop actually a vending=parking_tickets? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:vending%3Dparking_tickets
Either way, the name=parking is bad practice.
Pathumthani (2024-02-04 00:28:06+00:00): yes, correction done
0XIX2TU4CH (2023-01-04 05:19:34+00:00): Sure! I'll fix it.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:41:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:51:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
eggie (2023-01-04 08:07:41+00:00): Dag pepper..

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal_Open_Location_Code#Try_it_out

Plus codes represent an area, not a point

Greetz,
eggie
pepperop2 (2023-01-04 13:37:44+00:00): Hallo Eggie,

Het is echt even mijn weg vinden in wat wel en wat niet kan. Ik probeer nu te achterhalen of ik aan meerdere locaties de tag kan hangen van een PlusCode in plaats dat ik weer een nieuw vlak of 'way's' moet intekenen.

Een PlusCode kan een punt (node) zijn maar kan ook een vlak zijn, het is maar hoe precies de PlusCode is. Voorbeeld een PlusCode kan een punt zijn wanneer deze bijvoorbeeld bestaat uit de notatie 9F48577W+P57 maar als de notatie ruimer wordt gesteld op b.v. 9F48577W+, dan is er snel sprake van een vlak. Voordat ik nu wat meer PlusCode-tags ga hangen aan objecten lijkt het mij dus wijs om even jouw bericht af te wachten.

Uit de help-bijlage maak ik op dat middels 'ways' dan een area tot stand moet worden gebracht.

Ik zie graag jouw reactie tegemoet.

Vr. groet,

Peter
eggie (2023-01-04 13:47:05+00:00): Hoi Peter..

Tot vandaag was ik niet eens bekend met die plus code. Dus heb het even opgezocht. Zag dat het nog steeds een 'proposal' is.
Je zou het eens op het forum kunnen vragen of het nu inmiddels een valide tag is.
Mvg
Eggie
eggie (2023-01-04 13:49:23+00:00): Hier even het adres van het forum.
Inlog identiek aan je osm account

https://community.openstreetmap.org/
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:12:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
mavl (2023-04-25 09:00:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
ALu68 (2023-01-04 08:43:22+00:00): Hallo PiaVespRoll,

du hast hier amenity=parking_space erstellt/geändert.

Siehe wiki:
"Nutze amenity=parking_space, um den einzelnen Stellplatz ... ist eine Ergänzung zu amenity=parking, womit der gesamte Parkplatz erfasst wird"
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity=parking%20space?uselang=de

capacity =1 ist dann auch nicht sinnvoll.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:amenity


Diese Fläche ist nach dem Luft-Bild schlecht ausgerichtet https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1125372633

imagery_used=Bavaria (80 cm) - das Bing Luftbild ist schärfer.

Gruß. Andre
PiaVespRoll (2023-01-04 11:54:48+00:00): Hi Andre,
da muss ich ehrlich gesagt habe ich heute morgen recht schwer getan, denn neben Haus 4 sind 2 Stellplätze und oben wo Garagen sind rechts 4 und links 1 Stellplatz. Das habe ich am Samstag vor Ort gesehen und notiert. Hatte ich das nicht so notiert? Und die Stellplätze sind Privat also nicht öffentlich für alle nutzbar. Dachte hatte heute morgen nochmal korrigiert (auch die Stückzahl entsprechend eingegeben) wobei ich etwas verunsichert war ob ich das auch so richtig verstanden habe. Wenn nicht bitte mich gerne korrigieren.
VG
Pia
ALu68 (2023-01-05 09:48:05+00:00): Hallo Pia, 

nach dem Luftbild sieht es nach 4+2+2 Stellplätzen aus, aber entscheidend ist wie es vor Ort ist.

Da war aber nicht mein Punkt.
Es geht um "amenity=parking_space" vs. "amenity=parking".

Ein einzelner Stellplatz ist amenity=parking_space - ohne capacity.
Ein Parkplatz mit mehren Stellplätzen ist amenity=parking + capacity="Anzahl".

Im Wiki kannst du es nochmal im Detail nachlesen.

Öffentlich oder nicht wird mit access getagt: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access?uselang=de
- privat passt aber.
mavl (2023-02-27 07:27:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133071607 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132159284].
NorthCrab (2023-01-05 21:08:40+00:00): https://i.imgur.com/1VzMHrF.png
Proszę nie wymagaj od edytujących maksymalnego przybliżenia. Bo z daleka to nie widać co tu się dzieje. I prawdopodobnie ten stop nie stoi w tak okrutnym miejscu.

Proszę nie oznaczaj każdego skrzyżowania jako junction. Widać że to skrzyżowanie jak łączą się drogi. Używaj junction jeśli to skrzyżowanie ma np. jakąś nazwę albo jest jakoś "znane".
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:13:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
mavl (2023-02-27 07:27:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133071607 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132159284].
mavl (2023-02-27 07:27:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133071607 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132159284].
Tjuro_Global (2023-02-20 08:28:06+00:00): Hello,

I see that you have added some landuse=village_green. Please read:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dvillage_green
Would a more specific tag like grass or shrubbery be more appropriate?
Please read:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landcover%3Dgreenery
For a list of alternative tags.

Greetings Tjuro
Seraq (2023-02-20 14:10:12+00:00): Thank you very much Tjuro, I will modify what I did before

Greetings,
 
Seraq
mavl (2023-02-27 07:27:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133071607 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132159284].
SekeRob (2023-01-04 08:09:27+00:00): Hi,

You fixed it without fixing it, so I did. ;o)

ciao
Nar_ach (2023-01-05 09:15:19+00:00): Hi SekeRob,

 To fix a self-intersection error, I adjusted the node 4469832665 which overlapped with the farmland polygon. I referred to the source PCN 2012 - Italy, which showed trees covering the polygon until node 10304054334. For this reason I didn't modify the alignment of the existing polygon. Thank you for improving the data!

Regards,
Nar_ach
SekeRob (2023-01-05 10:30:16+00:00): Hi,

The solution here is to map a simple tree_row which I've just added. The alternate was to outline the wood along the canopy outline. More aesthetically pleasing if you ask me.

ciao
Nar_ach (2023-01-05 10:58:49+00:00): I agree. Thank you for sharing your input and adding the tree row.

Regards,
Nar_ach
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:56:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
AsgerFrank (2023-01-04 08:18:12+00:00): Ingen kilde angivet. Hvor kommer den information om cyklistforhold fra?
kortgodt (2023-01-04 10:38:41+00:00): Survey
AsgerFrank (2023-01-04 13:54:07+00:00): No problem, det skulle der da bare have stået i sourcefeltet.
AsgerFrank (2023-01-04 08:18:00+00:00): Ingen kilde angivet. Hvor kommer den information om cyklistforhold fra?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:36:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
AsgerFrank (2023-01-04 08:17:23+00:00): Ingen kilde angivet. Hvor kommer den information om cyklistforhold fra?
kortgodt (2023-01-04 10:38:17+00:00): Survey.
AsgerFrank (2023-01-04 13:53:27+00:00): No problem, det skulle der da bare have stået i sourcefeltet.
Luzandro (2023-01-06 16:25:31+00:00): Hallo,

ich habe die Verbindung des neuen Wegs zur Stadtgrenze entfernt. Wenn die Wege in der Nähe der Grenze verlaufen, muss man etwas aufpassen, womit man diese verbindet.

ein wenig irritiert mich, dass im Gegensatz zu den anderen Wegen in dieser Gegend, von den von dir eingetragenen nichts auf der Strava Heatmap erkennbar ist und diese Wege offenbar bisher praktisch nicht benutzt werden

https://www.strava.com/heatmap#16.72/16.28798/48.26159/hot/run

wenn, dann passt wohl auch eher path (informal / trail_visibility?) als footway, siehe 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpath

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dfootway
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130853401
GOwin (2023-01-05 02:14:59+00:00): Hi there! Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You requested for a review of this feature, and it appears that you're trying to map a boundary of an operational area for a police division.

You used barrier=yes to tag the area, and I updated it to use boundary=police. 

Ideally, boundary areas are created from existing elements as a relation, especially if they're based on administrative divisions.

May I know how you intend to use the area you mapped?

If you need any help, or clarification, you may reach out to the local mapping community, thru their online channels on several platforms:

https://osm.org/wiki/PH

If your intention is to visualize this area (e.g. for printing, presentations,etc.), you may find https://umap.openstreetmap.fr more appropriate for this purpose.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:06:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:25:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert