piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Negreheb (2023-09-18 11:05:29+00:00): How did you get information for these buildings? Is this some kind of AI-automated-building imports? Because https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1176962239 looks wrongly AI-generated. 

Additionally - is this account used by one person or by multiple persons? Its not clear from the profile i'm afraid (i used deepl to translate). 

Furthermore: A thread was opened in the forum about this - this is how i got here. Maybe you want to explain yourself there as well :)
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/low-quality-automated-creation-of-building/103944

Happy editing and thanks for your contributions!
Superadlen (2023-09-18 15:49:47+00:00): Thank you.. We will correct the errors. As soon as possible
Negreheb (2023-09-18 16:09:27+00:00): Thanks for the answer. An answer about the AI-Question is greatly appreciated in the forum.
InsertUser (2023-05-28 23:58:26+00:00): This appears to have removed the tagging for the type of road from way 55094101. I think this should be corrected.
eggie (2023-05-28 17:11:49+00:00): Idem...  
Het is hier nog landuse=construction
construction residential
en de wegen zijn 
highway=construction
met construction =residential.
eggie (2023-05-28 17:57:08+00:00): Verkeerslichten... een voetgangersoversteekplaats.
Kun je dat uitleggen?
Ik pas hier wat aan. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-05-28 18:32:17+00:00): Elk begin is moeilijk.
Je hoeft geen adressen aan te maken. Je kunt gewoon bijtaggen op de adresnode. Ik heb de info samengevoegd.
De format van de openingstijden klopt niet.
Gebruik anders deze toel. Dan is het resultaat altijd goed. Je kunt dat dan na invullen plakken in de tagging.
openingsuren-tool 
 
http://projets.pavie.info/yohours/ 

Groet
eggie
Andrea Musuruane (2023-05-30 12:11:02+00:00): Ciao. Io questo changeset non l'ho capito. Il ponte e le rampe di accesso sono state rimosse e stanno costruendo la strada al posto di queste. Su queste tratte c'era già access=no. Se proprio non ti piaceva, non era più facile mettere highway=construction? Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136664163
ivanbranco (2023-05-30 14:13:01+00:00): Non so se i lavori siano iniziati dal lato ovest, ma su quello est lo erano quando aggiunsi highway=construction (2 mesi fa) ed erano ancora lì 22 giorni fa quando ho aggiunto la sala slot vicino alla palestra. Io sarei per ripristinare la situazione precedente
Comix (2023-05-30 18:33:28+00:00): Ciao a tutti, forse sono stato precipitoso ma la mia intenzione era di rappresentare al meglio lo stato delle strade. Ora sono momentaneamente fuori città ma appena rientro faccio qualche foto. Potete tenere il changeset in standby?
Comix (2023-06-03 09:42:16+00:00): Ciao, ho scattato qualche foto (e fatto un paio di video). Come vedete i cantieri sono terminati con lo smantellamento del ponte. Al momento non c'è nessun progetto di ricostruzione, pertanto vi chiedo di considerare le mie modifiche. In ogni caso sono disponibile per parlarne, sono di Vercelli.
Link: https://imgur.com/a/aWclBpY

Ciao!
watmildon (2023-05-29 02:58:20+00:00): Hello! Thanks for contributing. I wanted to let you know that the names on these are unnecessary and not what the name field is used for. It is only needed if the house has a specific different name. I see you already have building=house and building=yes which already indicates "RUMAN" or "BANGUNAN" respectively. You can read more about it here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

I have corrected the tagging here. Let me know if there's anything else I can help with.
eggie (2023-05-28 18:34:12+00:00): Nee .. dat klopt niet, want gaat het in de 3d versie fout.
De zolder (vorm van het dak kun je mappen. ) telt niet mee. 
gr eggie
eggie (2023-05-28 18:46:59+00:00): aangepast...  dakgedeelte telt niet mee.
LuxuryCoop (2023-05-28 17:26:59+00:00): 오픈스트리트맵에 기여해 주셔서 감사합니다! 다음부터는 어떤 점을 추가/수정했는지 알려주신다면 더욱 감사드리겠습니다!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136664504
Cruncher8185 (2023-05-28 17:28:28+00:00): The building has a roof at the 4th floor which extends further out than the area I drew. But I didn't know how this works exactly on OSM.
How the second roof looks can be seen on the website of the building.
zstadler (2023-08-25 06:20:53+00:00): Hello fgottes,

Thank you for your contribution to OSM in the Beit Shemesh area!

In this and later edits you have added many streets and buildings where the source is GovMap.

Have you checked if the license of this source allows the use for Openstreetmap edits?

See
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines#Step_2_-_License_approval
and
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Vertical_Aerial_Photographs

Thanks,
Zeev
zstadler (2023-10-08 11:19:58+00:00): Hello again,

Please respond to the qiestion about the source of this and similar edits.
Without a clear response, I will need to rely on what you stated as a source and request their revert (deletion)

שלום רב,
אנא הגב לשאלה בדבר המקור לעריכה הזו ודומותיה.
ללא תשובה ברורה, אאלץ להניח שהמקור הוא govmap ולבקש את ביטול העריכות שלך.

בברכה,
זאב
eggie (2023-05-28 18:40:57+00:00): Tip Op zich oke. Die doorsteken worden meestal getagd met highway=path surface=...  en geen footway. Er staat geen bord wandelpad.
Het paaltje heb ik als voorbeeld  toegevoegd.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-05-28 18:58:01+00:00): access=no verwijderd. Dat hoeft niet op reguliere wegen.
eggie (2023-05-28 19:19:37+00:00): typo.. oneway=no hoeft niet op reguliere wegen :)
ndoorn (2023-05-29 07:14:05+00:00): Top, bedankt voor de uitleg :)
user_5359 (2023-05-28 18:00:37+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I remove your SEO SPAM (mostly foreign keys).
danieldegroot2 (2023-05-28 19:18:37+00:00): Hey Anne,

This changeset has been reverted by
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136668636

The bridge has been re-added in
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136669263

Regards,

Daniel
danieldegroot2 (2023-05-28 20:54:46+00:00): The stream and side-stream have been re-aligned and extended in
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136671974
GinaroZ (2023-05-29 22:17:38+00:00): Hi, thanks for the edit. Unfortunately we cannot use Google Maps as a reference for making changes.
However we can use Bing's Streetside: https://www.bing.com/maps?cp=55.997857%7E-3.783111&lvl=17.0&v=2&sV=1&pi=-1&style=x&dir=196.4
I have updated the buildings - if you are local and can survey the shops and POIs around here perhaps you can add those?
HikeAndMap (2023-05-30 08:21:39+00:00): Hi there, first of all thanks for your edits.

But would you be so kind - to split up the submission of edits?

You edited one node in Indonesia and one in Japan - which means tens of thousands of mappers are being flagged by your changes - even I here in the Philippines are flagged by your changes.

So please be so kind and split it next time.

Thank you
NorthCrab_upload (2023-05-28 18:20:21+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/613745848
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1070431428

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
wille (2023-06-27 16:49:58+00:00): Olá, você deletou vários edifícios em Petrópolis. Poderia explicar a razão?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136667223
Filip009 (2023-05-29 11:06:42+00:00): Dobrý deň, do  kolonky meno nemusíte zadávať "Turistický prístrešok", keďže je to zrejmé z typu bodu. Prosím opraviť.
mapper377 (2023-05-28 18:25:20+00:00): The changeset comment should also have said: "Add a second housenumber (720) to the house at 718 Madison Place in Ann Arbor, MI, to match the posted housenumbers."  The changeset was unintentionally closed too soon.
Glassman (2023-05-31 20:03:24+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136667441
Glassman (2023-05-31 20:03:30+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136667481
Glassman (2023-05-31 20:03:43+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136667603
Glassman (2023-05-31 20:03:56+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136667740
Thibault Rommel (2025-02-07 19:40:42+00:00): Dag Kurt
Hier verwijderde je landuse=industrial van enkele bedrijventerreinen bij het toevoegen van een naam.
Dit werd nu ongedaan gemaakt.
Kurt PM Lapere (2025-02-07 23:41:39+00:00): Dag Thibaut,
Ik heb hier inderdaad gesukkeld in een poging het terrein één te maken, sorry. Maar ik zie dat de naam er nu 5x op staat. Dat lijkt me ook niet ideaal...
Thibault Rommel (2025-02-08 12:52:33+00:00): Dat klopt, is een van de dingen die ik had opgelost.
Je drukt best even Ctrl+F5 om de kaart te refreshen.
Glassman (2023-05-31 20:04:16+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136667875
Protoxenus (2023-05-29 11:19:19+00:00): Was soll das? Hier ist kein Bahnhof, sondern ein Privatgrundstück. Es gibt nur einen Bahnsteig, Unterstände, Beleuchtung, Überwachungskameras, Sitzbänke. Bevor man mappt, sollte man mal gucken, was da schon kartiert ist. Und wenn man sich nicht auskennt, einfach mal die Finger stillhalten, ansonsten ist es nur Aktionismus.
Carto'Cité (2023-09-10 16:56:26+00:00): Salut Nzau,
Merci beaucoup pour tes contributions à Caen et aussi pour toutes les photos que tu prends et qui sont tellement utiles.
J'ai une curiosité pour cet aménagement : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/823113786
Tu l'as mis en segregated=no alors qu'il semblerait que oui :
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=194213163401740
Je me suis permis de modifier mais si tu penses que je me suis planté n’hésite pas à me dire.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #VeloNormandie.
Nzau (2023-09-10 17:05:27+00:00): Salut Charles,
C'est normal et merci à toi de m'avoir formé ! 
Effectivement tu as bien fait de modifier le segregated mais par contre tu as également changé le highway pour du 'path' ducoup le 'footway=sidewalk' ne sert plus, surtout qu'il s'agit à la base d'un trottoir qui pourrait d'ailleurs être catégorisé en pedestrian vu la largeur…
Après tout me vas personnellement ^^
Merci pour ton message et bonne fin de journée,
Nzau.
Carto'Cité (2023-09-11 07:24:23+00:00): Salut Nzau,
Merci pour tes retours !
Effectivement j'ai oublié de te dire que la définition de trottoir me semblait discutable sur ce chemin séparé de la route par une rangée d'arbres. Si tu as déjà vu des véhicules motorisés l'emprunteur effectivement ça pourrait passer en pedestrian.
Charles
Nzau (2023-09-14 07:47:03+00:00): OK pas de soucis j'avais identifié cela comme un trottoir car adjacent à une route et un peu surélever par rapport à celle-ci. Et je n'ai jamais vu de véhicules mais certain que ceux de la ville doivent y passe pour effectuer le nettoyage courant. La description de pedestrian est parfois compliquer à interpréter. 

Bonne journée,
Nzau.
AndySchulte (2023-07-14 11:27:23+00:00): Hi carteroXX2,

hier wurde von dir die Höchstgeschwindigkeit von 70 auf 60 geändert. Warum? Ein Nutzer unserer Navi App NUNAV Navigation meldet uns in der App wird 60 angezeigt, die Schilder am Straßenrand 70 sagen. 

Bitte überprüfe deinen CS nochmals.

Danke LG Andy
carteroXX2 (2023-07-14 16:15:11+00:00): Hallo Andy,
ich kann es gerade vor Ort nicht nachprüfen, bin mir aber sicher, auf einem Teilstück der Stralsunder Landstraße ein 60er Schild gesehen zu haben. OsmAnd hatte mir eine zu hohe Geschwindigkeit angezeigt, woraufhin ich die Änderung auf diesem Teilstück korrigiert hatte.
Vielleicht wurde hier zwischenzeitlich eine lokale Änderung der Höchstgeschwindigkeit vorgenommen.

Beste Grüße,
CarteroXX2
Glassman (2023-05-29 02:35:05+00:00): Thanks for the fix
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136668730
Piagno (2024-05-16 10:27:10+00:00): Salü Habi
Ist der Friseur nicht eher "Beauregard" (Tippfehler)
siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4244270
habi (2024-05-16 15:51:19+00:00): Das kann gut sein, auch wegen der Avenue Beuregard. Korrigierst du?
Piagno (2024-05-16 16:47:38+00:00): Jup,
Tippfehler korrigiert
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151417821
oba510 (2023-05-29 04:11:38+00:00): Note: when you put the barrier=kerb tags right on the intersection between two perpendicular sidewalks (such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9811659110 for example) it implies that someone walking along the sidewalk and turning directly onto the other has to step off the curb. In reality they never encounter a curb at all unless actually crossing the street. It's generally better to map the curb a little bit away from the intersection, where the crosswalk crosses the actual curb.
user_18305684 (2023-05-29 14:09:33+00:00): Bonjour,

pourquoi avoir changé un attribut bare_rock en un attribut inconnu bare_rock3 avec un attribut area (chemins 1177047612 et  446733112) ?

J'ai remis les anciennes valeurs.

Cordialement.
Adam Franco (2023-11-26 01:56:12+00:00): It is not appropriate to set the place=* value based on the incorporation status of municipalities. In OSM the place=* tag should have a value that is based on the size, amenities, and importance of the community, not it's incorporation status. In New England, the basic unit of municipal incorporation is called a "Town", but this doesn't mean that such a municipality demands a "place=town". 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:place#Populated_settlements,_urban_and_rural

Please follow up with the New England mapping community in the thread at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/new-england-place-name-inflation/103878/12
jxpsert (2023-06-27 10:43:56+00:00): Are you okay?
mini-me (2023-05-29 08:54:51+00:00): Не надо так. Транслитом должны заниматься роботы.
А что подразумевалось писать в int_name вообще не понятно ибо нет единого международного языка.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-05-28 19:40:16+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, zamień addr:place na addr:city. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9309546048

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2023-05-28 19:50:12+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1177070849

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
canfe (2023-05-30 05:49:44+00:00): Gli alberi mappati mi sembrano più una tree row per via della distanza regolare e dimensioni simili
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136670146
Silur (2023-05-28 19:57:58+00:00): Siehe auch Hamburger Abendblatt für die Hintergründe: https://www.abendblatt.de/region/pinneberg/article238249371/Abriss-Alte-Schlachterei-Gahde-weicht-grossem-Neubauprojekt.html
Note_Fixer (2023-05-28 20:22:33+00:00): demolation pending
user_5359 (2023-05-29 05:21:13+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! An welchen Ort ist denn jetzt der öffentliche Bücherschrank? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6995355371 hat eine entsprechende Schlüssel description aber keine korrekten weitere Schlüssel. Die kannst Du Dir übrigens bei Deinen anderen Knoten ansehen, der bereits korrigiert wurde.
maraf24 (2023-05-29 06:02:01+00:00): Ciekawy ten "rynek" tutaj :) - GSV pokazuje, że mają tablicę "ul. Rynek".
VictorIE (2026-03-31 14:39:52+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/548845802/

Query on old changeset.

Dublin City Council used to own Bohernabreena waterworks. There is a water pipeline under this car park.

The car park is marked operator=Dublin City Council, but is in the South Dublin County Council area.

I'm wondering if this is a typo or might it be related to the Bohernabreena waterworks. While the waterworks would have transferred to Irish Water, I'm not sure if something as tangential as the car park would have.
gogorm (2026-03-31 22:15:26+00:00): Not a typo. I've no idea what's there today, but at the time of editing, the information signs in the car park had Dublin City Council logo.
Adam Franco (2023-11-26 01:56:06+00:00): It is not appropriate to set the place=* value based on the incorporation status of municipalities. In OSM the place=* tag should have a value that is based on the size, amenities, and importance of the community, not it's incorporation status. In New England, the basic unit of municipal incorporation is called a "Town", but this doesn't mean that such a municipality demands a "place=town". 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:place#Populated_settlements,_urban_and_rural

Please follow up with the New England mapping community in the thread at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/new-england-place-name-inflation/103878/12
Adam Franco (2023-11-26 20:08:34+00:00): This invalid place-level retagging has been reverted. See community discussion at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/new-england-place-name-inflation/103878/21

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144484154
Msiipola (2023-05-31 10:19:26+00:00): Hej!
Jag försöker ladda upp vägar importerade från NVDB. Jag ser då att även du har ändrat vägar i Vingåker och det blir konflikter. De vägar jag tänker ladda upp är dock enligt NVDB och en del av dina ändringar kommer därför att skrivas över.
leojth (2023-05-31 13:24:28+00:00): Hej! Så länge det förbättrar datat är det bara köra på!
Msiipola (2023-05-31 14:01:49+00:00): Hej! och tack för att du inte tog illa upp. Man vet aldrig hur folk reagerar när det blir konflikter med andras ändringar. 
Förutom detta, är Vingåker en sorglig historia. Massor av naturpolygoner importerade 2018,  med dålig kvalité. Jag har försökt undvika ändra på något av dessa (det får bli ett separat jobb), men ibland har jag ändå ändrat eller tagit bort någon polygon. Och många fall leder det till andra problem. Hade jag vetat detta innan, så kanske jag inte alls börjat med uppdatering av Vingåker, men jag försöker nu slutföra det på smidigaste sätt.
Adam Franco (2023-11-26 18:42:10+00:00): We don't use abbreviations in OSM.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136671620
Adam Franco (2023-11-26 18:41:33+00:00): We don't use abbreviations in OSM
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136671725
lipuma (2023-05-30 11:28:07+00:00): Hi, in this changeset you added this way: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1177097385
It has some foreign tags, like `AREA_KM2 = 1258.771', `CD_MUN = 1720655', `NM_MUN = Silvanópolis', and `SIGLA_UF = TO'. Are you sure these are correct?
Fidelis Assis (2023-05-30 14:57:17+00:00): Hi, I'm aware. After updating thousands of boundary ways, some are inadvertently left with those extra tags. I run an overpass query to detect and delete from time to time.
Adam Franco (2023-11-26 18:41:07+00:00): We don't use abbreviations in OSM.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136671809
Adam Franco (2023-11-26 18:40:39+00:00): We don't use abbreviations in OSM
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136671833
Adam Franco (2023-11-26 19:53:55+00:00): This invalid place-level retagging has been reverted. See community discussion at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/new-england-place-name-inflation/103878/21

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144483686
jbrakomccomb (2023-06-02 19:52:43+00:00): Thank you!! Been working on changing these across Suffolk County.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136671909
MelancholicSlav (2023-06-02 23:39:18+00:00): Glad to be of help!
clay_c (2023-05-28 21:04:54+00:00): see discussion here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135196157
hfs (2023-06-07 07:20:50+00:00): Hi DrScheune,

in dieser Änderung hast Du die komplette Umrandung des Templiner Sees zum Fußweg gemacht. Das stimmt so nicht, weil es keinen durchgehenden Fußweg gibt. Wo es Wege gibt, sind sie schon separat erfasst.

Ich vermute, dass das ein Versehen war, weil Du in Vespucci editiert hast?

Ich habe es in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137042930 rückgängig gemacht.

Beste Grüße
hfs
eggie (2023-05-29 04:44:33+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
shuisman (2023-05-29 18:29:45+00:00): Bedankt voor de controle en de tips!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-29 11:40:06+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 135872556, 135872589, 135872613, 135872809, 135873182, 135873258, 135873312, 135873484, 135873502, 135873524, 135873625, 135873641, 135873676, 136020838, 136022081, 136022192, 136022264, 136022339, 136022426, 136022702, 136022887.
eggie (2023-05-29 04:53:01+00:00): Dag shuisman. Staat er hier een bord Woonerf. In dat geval is het correct.
Zoniet... dan highway=residential.
Wanneer de woningen zijn opgeleverd kan de regel construction=house worden verwijderd en de regel building=construction vervangen worden door building=house
De straatje aan de achterkant van de woningen is dat niet highway=service net als in de westkant  van de wijk?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-05-29 05:02:10+00:00): 
De wegklasse heb ik teruggezet naar residential en service. Laat even weten als er daadwerkelijk borden woonwerf zijn geplaatst.
MVG
eggie
shuisman (2023-05-29 18:33:45+00:00): Goed om te weten. De buitenste wegen niet, maar de binnenste wel.

Zie 136672090
eggie (2023-05-29 18:46:21+00:00): Oke... pas je het zelf weer aan?
Up to the local mapper.
'k Zie ook nog wat niet opgeloste opmerkingen op de kaart.. Wellicht van jezelf?
Mapse..
eggie
shuisman (2023-05-29 18:48:21+00:00): Hi Eggie,
Klopt, ik hem hem aangepast in change 136672090. Ik hoop dat het goed ging.
Daarnaast heb ik een andere weg toegevoegd in 136713358.

Bedankt voor het meekijken!
Gr, Sjoerd
moosfrosch (2023-09-14 07:38:10+00:00): Hallo,
mit Verlaub, Du hast da einiges Chaos bei den Straßenwidmungen hinterlassen. So hast Du einerseits die Emsbrücke auf access=no gesetzt, was den Zugang für ALLE gesperrt hat (kein Routing funktioniert mehr, auch nicht für Fahrrad und Fußgänger!), und zudem auf highway=cycleway gesetzt, was keinen Sinn macht. Die vorherige Angabe "designated" war so richtig, warum hast Du das geändert? Ich korrigiere mal rund um die Brücke und bitte dich, dich mal mit der Verwendung von den access-Tags zu beschäftigen und ggf. Deine eigenen Änderungen zu überprüfen.
eggie (2023-05-29 04:58:44+00:00): De specificatie teruggezet van de weg onder constructie