piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-08 00:30:09+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164656586
gpserror (2026-06-17 02:50:17+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12699172377 - if it's "permanent" what is its name?  Same as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13226666144 ?
ugh will I need to drive here and look? 
Usually food trucks are not mapped.
grzegorz75jan (2025-03-29 12:48:55+00:00): Do budynków włącz sobie w warstwach podkład obrysów budynków choć nie zawsze są prawidłowe.
https://postimg.cc/gallery/grtHB8G
Obrysy budynków staramy się wykonywać po fundamentach i trzeba wziąć pod uwagę, że zdjęcia lotnicze często są pod kątem więc trzeba nanieść poprawkę na to.

Zapoznaj się z spisem skrótów klawiaturowych  dostępnym w pomocy edytora. Znacznie ułatwią edytowanie. 
Przykładem jest klawisz Q. Zaznaczasz obrys budynku i gdy naciśniesz Q to kąty obrysu zostaną poprawione.

Jeden z budynków wykonałem po obrysie z podkładu. Od północy to może jakiś garaż, przybudówka, pergola itp. Jeżeli faktycznie masz wiedzę lokalną to dorysujesz co trzeba. 

Jeden z budynków na orto wygląda jak budowa więc ręcznie zrobiłem prowizoryczny obrys i zmieniłem tagi na construction. Jeżeli jest oddany do użytku to zmień.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164084417
NeisReview (2025-03-26 05:59:43+00:00): #UnexplainedChanges

Hello, welcome to OSM.

Could you please clarify the purpose behind your map changes? It's not entirely clear from the edited data and your added description. 

Looking forward to your response. 
Thank you.
NeisReview (2025-03-26 06:23:01+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/164088320
ivanbranco (2025-04-14 11:56:28+00:00): Hi M10,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12699194074

why is this studio-kindergarten-school mapped as tourism=artwork?

DeepL:

Привет M10,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12699194074

почему эта студия-детский сад-школа обозначена как tourism=artwork работа?
StC (2025-03-25 17:16:31+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre qui passe par là. Je m'occupe de la réparation.
Cricri93160 (2025-03-25 17:53:36+00:00): Bonjour 

Vraiment désolé j’ai pas fait attention d avoir brise l’itinéraire pédestre
frizatch (2025-04-07 01:24:23+00:00): The deleted building has indeed been removed, but the interim mapping was done mid-construction. Recommend looking at Aug 2024 Esri World Imagery for newest imagery of buildings.
smallbook (2025-03-25 16:54:17+00:00): Sorry, going to Exit 83, where there were not speed limits in OSM
NeisReview (2025-03-26 05:39:43+00:00): #NameCheck

Hello and welcome to OSM.

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits, particularly those concerning the names you've added or modified.

Some of these names caught my attention as they are quite unique or a bit unusual. Could you please confirm if these additions were intentional or if they might have been added mistakenly?

Looking forward to your response.

Thank you!
AnatoleFrance (2025-03-26 07:42:20+00:00): Hello NeisReview,

Thank you for your feedback.

Can you please specify about which name you are talking about ? Is it about sidewalk I added ? Or just the name of the modifications when I upload ?

I'm a beginner on OSM so I look forward to hearing from your feedback to improve.

Thank
NeisReview (2025-03-26 07:59:26+00:00): Thank you for your response, AnatoleFrance.

I find it unusual to name a sidewalk after the street. Perhaps other mappers could also provide feedback on this.
AnatoleFrance (2025-03-26 08:08:07+00:00): Ok so usually, when OSM providers add a sidewalk, they don't mention the name of the street ? 

I'll check on other cities how it is done and apply the same comportment.

Thank you for pointing this out
Jaiden1254 (2025-03-28 21:48:41+00:00): Surface = paved isn’t that specific 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:surface
Spush (2025-03-25 17:05:54+00:00): A buszútvonalakat vagy törölni kell vagy újra fel kell mérni, mert a relációk nem tartalmaznak megállókat.
aharvey (2025-03-26 00:00:33+00:00): It looks like you've tried to fix the overlapping ways, however https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163884869 showed the intent was to split it into track and trail. I've restored the track deleted here and fixed the overlap.
OSM_RogerWilco (2025-03-26 08:32:05+00:00): Moin MHD,

es wäre wirklich schön, wenn Du vorher mal nachfragen würdest, anstatt einfach Dein Stiefel durchzuziehen.

In name gehört der geläufige Namen. Das ist "Schützenkorps Walsrode". Der offizielle/vollständige Name kann dann mit offical_name erfasst werden. So wie ich es hier gemacht habe.

Adressdaten können außerdem auch am POI-Objekt erfasst werden.

VG Roger Wilco
woodpeck (2025-03-25 17:41:09+00:00): Dear pmzg, what you are doing here is what we call an "automated" or "mechanical" edit - you're editing with a program that you have written. Our guidelines require that such edits be discussed with the community before they are executed - i.e. you need to tell us what exactly you plan to edit and how, and need to give people a chance to raise concerns. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct for details. Please could you show me where this discussion has taken place?
pmzg (2025-03-25 22:17:40+00:00): hi, to be honest, i did not had such discussions beforehand, i was testing a simple program to format existing 'height' tags of surveillance cameras into a normalized float(wich is the widely used format); 
the code had such behavior :
'5m' ->'5' 
 '4,3'->'4.3'
'6 - 7m'->'6.5'
  
`
 h = h.replace(' ','')  
 h = h.replace(',','.')
 h = h.replace('m','')
 h = h.replace('M','')

the nodes in question were not accessible from api06.dev.openstreetmap, so I ran a test here without really looking the guidelines for this kind of action. I apologize for that and am willing to undo the changes I made if necessary.
Patchanka (2025-03-28 18:50:35+00:00): oups
le landuse residential a été supprimé par erreur on dirait
 https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4685862
Je te laisse le récupérer
Lejun (2025-03-29 09:10:18+00:00): 🙇
Patchanka (2025-03-29 09:18:07+00:00): 🙂 ça va, hein, y'a que ceux qui font rien qui font pas d'erreur
Gregory Peony (2025-04-22 22:10:20+00:00): Tagging an area like this will result in a huge building appearing on the map. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164088866
Gregory Peony (2025-04-04 03:27:46+00:00): This footprint appears to be East of where it should be.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164088954
Gregory Peony (2025-04-04 03:32:13+00:00): The footprints here are valid and appropriately squared, though they are generally oversized. Good attempt on mapping buildings you thought were L shaped; in this case they are simply quadrilateral and the ground beside them makes it appear as though the roof shape is different.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164089344
Gregory Peony (2025-04-07 01:03:43+00:00): The footprints you mapped here are generally valid and accurate but should be squared (q). Thank you for your attention to detail.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164089441
grzegorz75jan (2025-04-03 06:34:40+00:00): Kolejny cudowny las w lesie.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164089574
Gregory Peony (2025-04-06 04:25:30+00:00): Adding a layer tag is not usually the appropriate way to resolve overlap issues. In this case the highway should have been moved out of the way of the buildings in the imagery. Reference the mapping guide of the project. Issues are just automated flags; decide the best course of action when you see them. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164089689
josmougn (2025-04-12 22:54:08+00:00): bonsoir,
C'est redondant d'ajouter bicycle=designated quand highway=cycleway.
"Dans de nombreux cas, cet attribut n'est pas nécessaire, notamment si la voirie est déjà caractérisée par highway=cycleway", selon https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:bicycle=designated.

Sur ce way c'est même faux, il n'y a hélas rien de prévu pour les vélos à cet endroit : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1222966731/
AurélienQ (2025-04-13 08:31:00+00:00): En effet je n'avais pas vu que c'était mappé comme piste cyclable. Cela correspond pourtant à une voie verte si je me souviens bien (j'y suis passé il y a deux semaines). Auxquel cas il faudrait changer cycleway par path, et bien mettre bicycle=designated et foot=designated
josmougn (2025-04-14 15:28:05+00:00): On ne sait plus où donner de la tête avec le département de l'Essonne qui a promis une piste cyclable au ring des Ulis, a posé des panneaux B22a et a commencé à peindre une ligne de séparation entre cyclistes et piétons et des pictos vélos.
Il y a quelques jours les B22a ont été remplacés par des C115 et les travaux de peintures ont été interrompus.
En résumé dans les discours une piste cyclable, sur le terrain une "voie verte" en partie sur trottoir.
AurélienQ (2025-04-16 17:17:49+00:00): Tu as l'air de bien connaitre la coin (en tout cas mieux que moi😅), ça ne te dérangerais pas de le corriger ?
Norbert Dichter (2025-03-25 19:32:05+00:00): Do not forget to make buildings with rectangular corners: draw buildings as accurately as possible, without the shadows, then type 'Q'.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164090127
ervinjoshuadelrosario (2025-03-25 18:17:53+00:00): Correction: Edited Freeport Area of Bataan, modified administrative boundary of the said freeport zone.
Gregory Peony (2025-07-12 01:24:50+00:00): You did well to delete invalid footprints that enveloped multiple buildings, but the footprints you added could have been more accurate and squared (q). Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164090438
Gregory Peony (2025-04-07 02:57:42+00:00): All footprints here are valid and most are accurate. Remember to use the q key to square footprints when appropriate and use the other editing shortcuts to make mapping accurately easier. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164090471
Gregory Peony (2025-04-03 05:26:46+00:00): Many of these footprints outline multiple buildings. 1 building per footprint please.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164090543
Gregory Peony (2025-04-04 20:02:56+00:00): All footprints you added here are valid; it's good that you accurately mapped the L shaped building. Remember to square the corners (q), and please continue mapping.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164090625
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-27 12:53:25+00:00): reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410  and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969  remain not answered

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173837041
Gregory Peony (2025-04-14 21:14:47+00:00): The footprint I flagged is likely two adjacent buildings and not one.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164090679
Dimitar155 (2025-04-01 14:32:22+00:00): Здравей Fraxi!

Днес минах оттук, Smart station е зад бутката на ЦГМ. Часовникаря е там, където беше отбелязан.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6295019549
Fraxi (2025-04-01 15:53:04+00:00): Здравей! 
Добре, а имаш ли спомен дали другите обекти са както по този changeset? И ако действително не съм объркал и има такъв магазин за GSM аксесоари, той отляво или отдясно е на часовникаря?
Fraxi (2025-04-01 16:03:00+00:00): Оф, извинявай, не съм прочел внимателно.
Gregory Peony (2025-04-09 19:58:42+00:00): Although they could be more accurate and squared (q) it looks like you identified possible buldings under construction here.
eggie (2025-03-25 18:35:56+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback.. Je kunt geen schuingenomen luchtfoto's gebruiken om gebouwen opnieuw uit te lijnen. Alle gebouwen zijn precies ingemeten door het Kadaster en als zodanig geïmporteerd.  Beter dus geen gebouwen opnieuw uitlijnen. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-03-25 18:41:05+00:00): Gebouwen opnieuw uitgelijnd. Het lijkt dan verkeerd, maar klopt precies. Svp niet naar de dakranden kijken.
Reshaped buildings again according BAG. 

MVG
eggie
Full Throtlle (2025-03-25 18:56:44+00:00): Beginnerś mistake! 
I was indeed looking at the background picture edges, because the small introductory training said it was important to perfectly align buildings... 

Thanks for the feedback and submitting the rest of my changes
eggie (2025-03-25 18:59:27+00:00): 👍 no problem
Full Throtlle (2025-03-25 18:59:39+00:00): Btw, is that only the case for the Netherlands? 

I noticed that in other countries, at some places there are no existing buildings outlined at all!
eggie (2025-03-25 19:10:05+00:00): Hi... No more countries gets their import from the governments registry.
Look at the tags on the buildingshapes.

In Holland the source is BAG. (Buidings and Addressnodes
Gr eggie)
eggie (2025-03-25 19:11:14+00:00): Typo.. No.... More countries for sure..
Full Throtlle (2025-03-25 19:11:46+00:00): Good to know! Thanks
bkil (2025-03-26 10:58:30+00:00): Köszönjük a közreműködést. A következő problémát fedeztem fel a szerkesztésben: https://wiki.osm.org/Hungary/Fontos_szempontok#addr
bkil (2025-03-26 11:02:21+00:00): Köszönjük a pontosítást. A következő további címkéket használjuk amit szintén jó volna felvinni: https://wiki.osm.org/Hungary/Jel%C3%B6l%C3%A9si_p%C3%A9ld%C3%A1k#Gyalogos%C3%A1tkel%C5%91hely
bkil (2025-03-26 11:03:50+00:00): Biztos, hogy nem aszfalt az út felszíne? Betonnal leginkább alapozni szoktak
Gregory Peony (2025-04-14 21:17:22+00:00): The footprint I flagged has a more complex shape. Add more nodes and use the corners of the roof to map it accurately. The points you place need to be colse to square to be squared by ID editor, watch the beginer mistakes videos on the missing maps youtube chanel for more details.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164090960
bkil (2025-03-26 11:07:06+00:00): A legtöbb gyalogút ha nem füves vagy földes, akkor paving_stones. Biztos, hogy a wiki alapján ez a bevonat tükrözi a legjobban ami a terepen látható? concrete:lanes inkább track vagy service mentén szokott lenni https://wiki.osm.org/Key:surface
Gregory Peony (2025-03-25 23:50:28+00:00): The footprints to the West of this changeset are the best I've seen you digitise so far. Though their accuracy could be better and they should be squared (q), they represent individual buildings and thus are valid.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164091048
Gregory Peony (2025-04-03 05:44:39+00:00): These footprints are generally valid though inaccurate; they should be smaller and squared. The footprint in the SE outlines multiple buidlings 1 footprint per building please: use shadows and colour to determine where one ends and the other begins. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164091253
Gregory Peony (2025-03-27 23:24:14+00:00): This is a decent changeset. All but two of the footprints you added here are valid and appropriately squared. Generally they could be be more accurate.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164091441
Gregory Peony (2025-03-26 00:52:50+00:00): the highway you deleted should have been move and not deleted. Unless a feature does not exist it is best practice to modify existing data rather than deleting it and re drawing.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164091547
Gregory Peony (2025-03-26 01:06:10+00:00): See my resolution in changeset: 164101915 Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164091547
Gregory Peony (2025-03-26 00:24:24+00:00): Some of the footprints you added here share nodes with highways: hold alt to prevent your cursor from snapping to exisitng data. You inappropriately tagged a building with a layer=1 tag (the one I flagged): generally instances of overlapping features should be resloved by modifying the geometry of features. Adding a layer tag suggests that the footprint is above the highway. It makes the warning go away but doesn't address the cause of the issue, warnings are there to grab your attention, then secide the best course of action sometimes ignoring warnings is the best thing to do. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164091560
Gregory Peony (2025-03-26 01:03:07+00:00): By resolving the issue incorrectly you make the problem harder to spot for others. In this case the highways and buildings should have been modified to resolve the issue as per the project document. Check Changeset: 164101748 for my resolution https://osmcha.org/changesets/164101748?filters=%7B%22ids%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%22164101748%22%2C%22value%22%3A%22164101748%22%7D%5D%7D
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164091560
Gregory Peony (2025-04-14 17:14:33+00:00): I flagged some footprints which outline multiple buildings here.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164091642
Gregory Peony (2025-04-07 03:29:20+00:00): Overlap issues are usually caused by data geometry. Layer tags indicate that a feature is above or below another.
Gregory Peony (2025-04-03 02:31:03+00:00): Hi it looks like you've accidentally modified an admin boundary in this changeset. To avoid this you can filter out boundaries via the map features drop down in the map data panel of ID editor, or the filter window of JOSM. I've restored the geometry of the boundary in changeset 164444498. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future.
silversurfer83 (2025-03-25 19:56:12+00:00): Hi

diese Variante, dass du an den einzelnen Elementen des Gebäudes das "building:part=yes" löscht und dafür ein "building=hospital" setzt halte ich für ungünstig.

Kannst du mir erklären, warum du das für korrekt hälst? Aktuell gibt es noch einen quasi Gesamtumring der nur "bulding:part=yes" als Eigenschaft hat, was dem gesamten simple 3D tagging, woher diese Vorgehensweise stammt, eigentlich widerspricht.

Grüße
silversurfer83

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:building:part
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164091753
silversurfer83 (2025-04-04 19:53:19+00:00): Hi

wie sieht's aus?
SoGetThis41 (2025-04-04 23:08:17+00:00): Ja, war Unwissenheit meinerseits. Werde das bei Zeiten korrigieren, will sowieso noch die südlichen Parkplätze kartieren.
silversurfer83 (2025-04-05 05:35:33+00:00): Alles klar. Danke :)
Gregory Peony (2025-03-26 06:55:18+00:00): You correctly identified that the building to the north is L shaped, well done. Please remember to square (q) your footprints going forward.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164091832
Gregory Peony (2025-04-03 04:48:24+00:00): Almost all footprints valid and approritely squared, thoguth they could be more accurate. Generally these are a little oversized and sometimes include the buildings shadow in their size.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164091848
Gregory Peony (2025-04-11 21:31:08+00:00): All footprints here outline an individual building in the imagery except for the one in the West. The footprints however are not accurate and share common nodes. I recommend watching the common mapper mistakes videos on the missing maps youtube chanel.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164091943
Gregory Peony (2025-03-26 05:22:55+00:00): All footprints save for the NE one are valid, though not accurate. Draw the building well accurately enough, tag it, then square (q) or round (o) it, then resize. Helpful shortcuts can be found when pressing ? in ID editor. --- The residential area overlaps footprints. I recommend modifying features you expect to overlap footprints before mapping them so that it's out of your way and less likely to cause issues. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164092026
rle32795 (2025-06-04 06:03:07+00:00): Hei,

osaatko sanoa vielä, miksi muokatun polun kautta ei voi kulkea?

Terv.
rle
Gregory Peony (2025-04-08 03:21:12+00:00): The footprints you added here likely represent yurts as shown in the project mapping guide and should not be mapped. I deleted these footprints.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164092118
Gregory Peony (2025-04-03 04:50:58+00:00): Highways overlap buildings here and share common nodes with them. Prepare your area before mapping. reference my project comment and the mapping guide.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164092137