piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
silversurfer83 (2023-03-23 09:40:38+00:00): Hi
hame=* halte ich an dieser Stelle möglicherweise für unagebracht. Diese Annehmlichkeiten können vielliecht über nodes mit https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Ddressing_room  Kenntlich gemacht werden. Wenn am Kiosk groß "Kiosk" dran steht, dann geht der Name ok. Sonst einfach nur shop=kiosk, ggf. mit Öffnungszeiten und description

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133973663
eggie (2023-03-22 12:13:31+00:00): Gebouw 580 weer aangepast aan de BAG / BGT
MVG
eggie
pantufla (2023-03-22 15:01:36+00:00): Hey, Theman, thanks for the modification. It seems better, the thing is I'm not an expert in Baseball represantation in OSM and was trying to use world famous Yankees Stadium as a reference for other fields in my country where I'm editing them. Here is something I find is not entirely correct: There seem to be to elements tagged as leisure=pitch and sport=baseball which makes it kind of a duplicate, making it wrong for statistics and other uses. How do you think it should be mapped?
MxxCon (2023-03-23 05:57:56+00:00): Hello.
This edit is going to be reverted. Previous tagging was correct.
MLS team New York City Football Club plays their home games in The Yankee Stadium.
https://www.mlb.com/yankees/ballpark/new-york-city-football-club and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yankee_Stadium#Soccer
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133974060
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-23 08:15:26+00:00): W jaki sposób dodałeś adresy na podstawie zdjęć lotniczych?
jslawin (2023-03-23 11:21:31+00:00): Chodziło o budynki a nie adresy, adresów nie dodaję.
gmar5 (2023-03-22 16:15:58+00:00): Hi. Why unnecessary? The name refers to the overall area, having three duplicates is not correct IMO. If you had issue with its construction, then it would be better to edit its outer.
landfahrer (2023-03-22 19:19:54+00:00): It is unnecessary because three touching outers will generate an error in the OSM inspector.
Having three duplicates is correct. You could also create a single land area with the associated tags
Devdatta (2023-03-22 12:55:30+00:00): Again, why are your Changesets over such a large area? in your changeset, you have roads crossing over highways.

Please correct this.
Snusmumriken (2023-03-23 07:11:52+00:00): Hi 

I noticed that you removed the tag payment:cash=yes from Sundbergs café. Do you know that they no longer accept cash? If so, it would be better to tag it with payment:cash=no
mapperich (2023-03-23 10:23:56+00:00): Interesting, I didn't do that on purpose. I clicked the button 'accepted' at card payments. It did remove cash automatically. The other two options are 'no' and 'only'. So 'accepted' looked right to me, as there is a label at the front door. I'll check and edit if necessary!
mapperich (2023-03-23 10:30:45+00:00): I was just close by and asked, the do accept cash. Will change it in the next commit. Thanks for noticing! :)
Snusmumriken (2023-03-23 10:42:16+00:00): Cool thanks. Perhaps it would make sense to reach out to those that make the tool you're using, if there's possibly a bug?

An other comment, in Stockholm we prefer to have only one instance of a given address, preferably at an entrance. So we don't addresses to POIs.

Otherwise great level of detail in your mapping
mapperich (2023-03-23 12:04:05+00:00): It might, I'll check their GitHub issues once I'm back home. 

Thanks for the hint, I removed all poi addresses in the next commit.
Wookey (2023-07-30 11:51:10+00:00): Hi. I saw your note about a segment of the old road being deleted by you didn't know how to move NCN51 (and Bernwood Forest Loop) over to the new bridge. I've fixed that today. (along with footpath and power lines north of Claydon Park).
ToniE (2023-03-23 07:22:15+00:00): +1 und hoffentlich kehrt hier diesbezüglich mal Ruhe ein.

Gruß
Toni
osm-user12 (2023-06-16 15:47:18+00:00): Dieser way 1156280151 hat keine tags. Vlt. eine Böschung?
CJTmmr (2023-07-15 13:31:38+00:00): Hi Zesty,

You recreated the old Geissgasse, but it no longers exist, since the new talstation of the sesselbahn is ready as of NOV 2022
The aerial footage is outdated, if you use it for survey
AntMadeira (2023-03-22 17:46:43+00:00): Olá, djninja.

Vi que adicionaste o nome de uma localidade nestas ruas, mas isso não se deve fazer em ruas, mas sim com um ponto de aldeia ou bairro, consoante o caso.
Se adicionares um ponto (mais ou menos no centro da localidade) e procurares por "aldeia" ou "bairro" no editor, irás encontrar o preset certo para o poderes adicionar. 
Se fizeres isso, peço que removas a localidade das ruas.
Qualquer dúvida, estou ao dispor.

Cumprimentos,
António Madeira.
djninja (2023-03-23 21:05:17+00:00): Olá,

Obrigado pelo feedback back. Já procedi às correcções que indicaste. Se estiverem incorrectas peço que me indiques como corrigir.

Cumprimentos
AntMadeira (2023-03-23 23:34:50+00:00): Obrigado pelas correções.
Ainda vejo ali algumas ruas que não parecem existir, casas desquadradas (basta usares a tecla Q para esquadrar edifícios e outros polígonos), mas, pouco a pouco, vais aprendendo. Aconselho-te a fazeres o tutorial do editor, que podes aceder no menu da direita (tecla H -> iniciar tutorial) e as seguintes leituras:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Boas_pr%C3%A1ticas

http://bit.do/padronizacao-em-Portugal

E tens o canal da comunidade portuguesa de OSM no Telegram, onde podes tirar dúvidas e aprender mais sobre o o OSM:
https://t.me/OSMPortugal

Cumprimentos,
António.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-03-22 12:30:22+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/788278168
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/788277511

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
MooPoo7 (2023-04-23 20:14:55+00:00): Hey skaslam! I just wanted to let you know that you shouldn't draw turn lanes as separate ways. Simply draw a new way right when the road physically separates. Happy mapping!
skaslam (2023-04-24 10:11:00+00:00): Hello MooPoo7,

Thank you for reviewing my changeset and correcting my mistake. I realize that my previous edits were incorrect and I apologize for any inconvenience that I may have caused. I assure you that I will be more careful in the future and make sure to avoid similar errors. Your help in fixing the issue is greatly appreciated, and I look forward to learning more from you in the future.

Regards,
skaslam
Langlaeufer (2023-03-22 16:25:36+00:00): Hallo FNKE,
was wolltest du denn mit dem umtaggen zu footway bezwecken? Jetzt sind die restlichen tags  widersprüchlich. Nach meiner Kenntnis waren die Radwegschilder in eine Richtung abgeklebt. Weist du näheres dazu? Ansonsten würde ich den Weg zunächst als Radweg wiederherstellen, bis eine neue Beschilderung vorhanden ist.
Grüße
Langläufer
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133976679
Langlaeufer (2023-03-22 16:26:39+00:00): Ich sehe gerade, das ist ja ein Anderer Weg der definitiv mit 240 beschildert ist. dann war path ohne jeden Zweifel vollkommen richtig.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133976679
FNKE (2023-03-31 06:26:59+00:00): Das war ein Missverständnis meinerseits zur Beschreibung zu "Path"
Langlaeufer (2023-03-31 07:44:28+00:00): Alles klar. Weiterhin frohes mappen
eggie (2023-03-22 12:48:38+00:00): Top!
Veel plezier met mappen..
eggie
GartenStuhl (2023-03-22 13:09:10+00:00): Hatte eigentlich noch nie schiss vor einem upload hier... Aber...
Naja :)

Ich wollte insbesondere den CS im Comment reverten, da das einfach.. naja, nicht toll war.

Die Relation 1734161 machte mir etwas sorgen, darum hat der CS auch so eine grosse Box hier, sorry.

Folgende andere CS haben einige Punkte aus der Relation "Hauptstrasse 12" gelöscht: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133435837
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133947463
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133557432
Die ich aus der Relation auch entfernen musste.
Dennoch scheint sie mir nicht korrekt:
http://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeMap?relationId=1734161 (in Balstal = Unterbruch?)
d_berger (2023-03-22 16:35:15+00:00): Wie alle Hauptstrassen-Relationen ist auch die H12 durch Aufteilung in Richtungsfahrbahnen et al an etlichen Stellen "zerfallen". Hab sie weitgehend wieder zusammengesetzt, was im CS133986058[1] mit noch viel grösserer bounding box resultierte.

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133986058
NorthCrab_upload (2023-03-22 13:00:30+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1106903038

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
bkil (2023-03-22 16:20:51+00:00): Which end of it is it actually? Do you see a sign there as well stating this fact? It should be either placed on a short section of road there or within a poligon area, depending on local topology.
GameZ_2022 (2023-03-22 16:39:46+00:00): You can see the signs of this fact if you check this area on Google's Street View. 

Only 4 buildings are named to Alföldi tér (they're located in the triangle) close to the railways. Those buildings were built maybe around 2000's while the others in Alföldi utca around 1970's.
segubi (2023-08-19 08:47:49+00:00): Zum Fahrradwegweiser: Ich würde sehr empfehlen, keine Routenmarkierungen in die direction_* - Tags zu integrieren. Mehr infos: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/reprasentation-des-aktuellen-offiziellen-deutschen-radverkehrsnetzes-nach-den-vorgaben-der-fgsv-in-osm/4805/40
chris66 (2023-08-19 09:29:18+00:00): Ja da bin ich dafür.
Die Änderung war von GerdP, ich habe hier nur das image hinzugefügt.
pio2_122 (2023-03-22 15:55:46+00:00): Na odcinku S11 Bobolice - Szczecinek nie zakończył się nawet przetarg (https://gddkia.eb2b.com.pl/open-preview-auction.html/383152/budowa-drogi-s11-koszalin-szczecinek-odc-w-bobolice-bez-wezla-w-szczecinek-polnoc-z-wezlem).

Wandalizm wycofany.
pesec (2023-03-23 06:13:15+00:00): Добрый день.
согласно:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:capacity:disabled?uselang=ru
Либо указывается количество мест, либо yes/no
0 не указывается, исправьте
user_18241296 (2023-06-14 12:33:34+00:00): Добрый день, исправлено https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137326457
bkil (2023-03-22 16:19:10+00:00): Köszönjük a közreműködést. Szeretnénk felhívni a figyelmet, hogy a házszám után nem kell pontot írni: elég a "11"
bkil (2023-03-22 17:28:21+00:00): Translation: thank you for your cooperation. The trailing dot is not needed after the house number, please remove it.
wireguy (2023-03-22 17:00:40+00:00): RMD, Welcome to OSM!   thanks for outlining the buildings, but they could be better outlined.   Press 'Q' key when the buildings is selected will square the corners.  Also, name is used for thing that have a name, Residential is not a name.   Keep mapping.
DaveF (2023-03-22 17:36:02+00:00): Hi
Welcome to OSM.
What was the source of your information?

The lanes tag for these roads should be 2, one in each direction.
DaveF (2023-03-22 17:38:48+00:00): Clarification: The lanes tag refers to the A367 or roads with a centre line marking.
Taxan86 (2023-03-22 17:40:29+00:00): hello

i am delivering in this area since January 2021, around  radstock frome warminster
DaveF (2023-03-22 18:31:34+00:00): What evidence do you have? I can't find any Traffic Orders from BathNES. Do you have any photographs of updated signage?

Could you please revert the erroneously amended lanes tag.
Taxan86 (2023-03-22 18:35:47+00:00): i will send you some pictures tomorrow

there are some roadworks and some lanes in countryside with just 1 lane
Taxan86 (2023-03-22 19:06:05+00:00): could you pls tell me how its possible to have speed limit 80 and 125 miles / h on country side roads ? where the speed is 20 miles / h max

loads of city roads have speed limits 50-60 m/h but the legal limit is 30 m/h
DaveF (2023-03-22 22:14:22+00:00): This might solve your confusion: "The maximum fixed numeric speed limit, followed by the appropriate unit, if not measured in km/h"
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxspeed



"loads of city roads have speed limits 50-60 m/h but the legal limit is 30 m/h"

Even if that were true, it's irrelevant  to your changeset.

Please provide concrete evidence of these changes, especially the A roads, or I'll be reverting the changeset.
DaveF (2023-03-26 23:15:11+00:00): As you haven't provided any corroborative data I'll now revert this changeset.
felipeeugenio (2023-03-23 14:46:07+00:00): Hola Sebastián. Eso no es un parque.

este es el tipo de ediciones que hacen que te preguntes si juegas a alguna app que saca provecho de los parques. 
en otra parte de Pitrufquén también agregaste un parque bastante dudoso. Estaba pensando en dejarlo, pero ahora insistes con este. Es un terreno en que hay una cancha solamente. No hay nada que pueda ser considerado parque desde las fotos satelitales. Además es claro que existen al menos 4 recintos separados en esta manzana. No insistir con que son uno solo por favor.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133978365
SebaVC (2023-03-24 12:44:54+00:00): Hola Felipe,
discrepo con tu decisión y no son recinto, los que ves en el mapa, son centro de junta de vecinos. Yo vivo acá en pitru y si quieres te mando fotos de los juegos que tiene el lugar acá. Insisto que debería ser considerado como Plaza de juegos, pero esa opción existe como parque en donde se ve en todas partes. Si el satélite no te convence, insisto que te puedo mandar fotos o hasta una video llamada presencial del lugar para que se crea que es verdad.
felipeeugenio (2023-03-24 12:54:58+00:00): Hola. por favor encerrar la parte de juegos con el tag leisure=playground.
Pero solo esa parte.
El Centro comunitario es amenity=community_centre.
Una cosa es vivir en un lugar otra muy distinta es saber usar bien los tags.
Asumo que la parte que cree que es parque es la que está cercana a los luegos.
por favor mapear de esa manera para revisar precisamente cuál es el sector que dice ser un parque.

Saludos
map per (2023-03-23 08:25:08+00:00): Hallo Steininger,
wegen "review requested":
Du hast den Schorner Weg mit der Autobahn verbunden und damit aus dem Tunnel eine Straßenkreuzung gemacht. Bitte den Schorner Weg wieder von der Autobahn trennen (geht in ID mit Rechtsklick auf den Verbindungspunkt)

Um dort eine Brücke einzuzeichnen muss man die Linien der Autobahn am Anfang und Ende der Brücke aufteilen (geht wieder mit Rechtsklick auf einen Punkt) und die Brücke dann unter "Struktur" zur Brücke machen.

Viele Grüße
map per
Steininger (2023-03-23 09:37:42+00:00): Hallo map per, danke für deinen Kommentar. Der leicht abgesenkte Schorner Weg führt unter der Autobahnbrücke hindurch (Link zu Fotos siehe im Verlauf). Der Weg und auch die A95-Brücke sollten überarbeitet werden. Das aber übersteigt meine Kenntnisse. Deshalb hatte schon mal ein fixme plaziert. Die aktuelle Änderung habe ich nur gemacht, weil klemtors aus dem Weg eine Brücke gemacht hat. Wer kann helfen? VG Steininger
map per (2023-03-23 11:23:24+00:00): Danke, hab die Brücke eingezeichnet. 

Wenn du bei irgendwas Hilfe brauchst würde ich statt fixmes Hinweis (1) verwenden, die werden in der Regel schneller und von mehr Leuten angeschaut. (Ansonsten kannst du mir auch gerne schreiben)

Viele Grüße
map per

(1) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Notes
gendy54 (2023-07-29 15:55:07+00:00): Redécoupage des emprises
marczoutendijk (2023-03-22 13:37:32+00:00): Why this huge bounding box?
Jayden26 (2023-04-23 20:11:46+00:00): I don't know, I didn't edit there
Jayden26 (2023-04-23 20:11:55+00:00): Must be some mistake
UPegasus (2023-04-15 13:09:20+00:00): improper use of "natural" tags
map per (2023-03-23 08:34:20+00:00): Hallo Steininger,

du hast hier (1) leider den highway=unclassified Tag gelöscht. Damit ist der Weg jetzt keine Straße mehr. Den Highway Tag bitte wieder eintragen.

Und es ist besser die incline=* Angaben nur auf dem Straßenabschnitt mit Steigung zu setzen. Der Teil von (1) der durch Achmühle führt hat vermutlich keine 11% Gefälle. Da am Besten die Straße am Anfang und Ende der Steigung aufteilen (geht in ID mit Rechtsklick auf einen Punkt auf der Straße).

Danke und viele Grüße
map per

(1) https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/382377309/history
Steininger (2023-03-23 09:43:09+00:00): Hallo map per, die Löschung war nicht beabsichtigt und kann ich mir auch nicht erklären. Die 11%-Steigung beginnt zwischen Alpenblick und Ringstr. Ich weiß, dass man dann den Weg aufteilen sollte, aber dazu fehlen mir die Kenntnisse. Wer kann helfen? VG Steininger
map per (2023-03-23 11:26:45+00:00): Danke für die Korrektur, hab den Weg noch aufgeteilt
Geogast (2023-09-19 13:33:23+00:00): é errado. A Igreja não está rodeado dum cemitério. É, de fato, um lugar pequenino ao lado da Igreja. Tão pequeno que, de fato, foi bom com um node graveyard.
rojjodo (2023-03-22 20:37:28+00:00): Hi, I walk regularly in Hatfield Forest and I notice that a couple of informal paths near the Flitch Way have been removed from OSM. Was this deliberate? The paths exist and are frequently used.
Regards
Bob Dean
rojjodo (2023-03-22 22:18:12+00:00): Also:
1. As I read the NT tagging guidelines, I think the service road in Hatfield Forest should be "motor_vehicle=customer" as it is only open to NT members and those who have paid to enter.
2. Do you intend to remove the paths that were closed around 2016/2017, such as the West Ride between Leapers Lane and Beggars Hall?
Regards
Bob Dean
JasmineRanasinghe (2023-03-23 16:35:29+00:00): Hi Bob,

Thank you for your messages. The informal paths near the Flitch Way marked as informal paths I believe I changed the highway type to footway or path. This may have been why they were flagged as deleted. Any that may have been deleted I would have done so with the site rangers permission as it wasn't a recognised path or footway on the ground.

Regards
Jasmine
JasmineRanasinghe (2023-03-23 16:40:24+00:00): With regards to the service road in Hatfield Forest, we only use the 'motor_vehicle=customer' tag if they are specifically behind a pay barrier. As in Hatfield Forest there isn't a physical pay barrier, but there is a car park you pay for we instead tag the service road as permissive.

The closed paths including West Ride between Leapers Lane and Beggars Hall will remain on the map because the ways are still physically visible on the ground. Instead of deleting them we change the access tags on these ways to =no and add a description tag with reasoning to a closure.

Regards,
Jasmine
rojjodo (2023-03-23 17:00:15+00:00): Hi Jasmine,
The informal paths have been deleted. The problem with recognition is who recognises the paths? The paths exist on the ground and are used. Normal practice in OpenStreetMap is to map what is on the ground, not  necessarily what some authority wishes to be on the ground.
Regards
Bob
JasmineRanasinghe (2023-03-24 10:49:31+00:00): Hi Bob,
We recognise that the best practise is to map what actually exists on the ground.

One section of informal path that was removed had some use as indicated from the Strava heatmaps but was not a recognised path on the ground by the ranger team at the time. This may be the section of informal path you are referring to which forks through woodland below the Flitch Way. Having discussed this with the team we understand that this is in fact on the ground and as such I will put this section back into OpenStreetMap. However it crosses sensitive ancient woodland and the team are discouraging access and therefore the tags will be amended to reflect this.

Regards,
Jas
nickvet419 (2023-04-06 23:09:24+00:00): When did this change take place?  I didn't know there was any revised plan? source link?
LpAngelRob (2023-04-07 00:44:50+00:00): I added it as a tag to the commit, but the key source is https://www.illinoistollway.com/documents/20184/101637/20220414+EOWA+Meeting+Presentation.pdf/810187ec-fd6c-c31c-f2a5-489be1ff4d2d?version=1.0&t=1650559192048&download=true
nickvet419 (2023-04-08 03:44:57+00:00): ahh,  I did see that, didnt have a lot of info but, made some adjustments and it seems to look accurate now. Ill have to scour the web and see if i can find some belter diagrams.
LpAngelRob (2023-04-09 06:20:34+00:00): See some more diagrams at https://chicityclerk.s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/document_uploads/journals-proceedings/2022/2022_03_23_0.pdf about 1/3 of the way in, but note that some of them look like concepts, not plans.
TT_Chili_King (2023-03-22 14:07:42+00:00): Comment should have said "...overlap with Road..." Not RR Tracks
MxxCon (2023-03-23 06:03:08+00:00): These are not highway tags. But they shouldn't have been deleted. These are nycdoitt:bin=* tags which uniquely identifies each building in NYC's database.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133980085
Ropino (2023-03-23 06:19:20+00:00): It was not clear to me what this was/is.
Sorry, I forgot to check the history of this object.
Thx for the correction back to the original value.
eggie (2023-03-22 17:34:02+00:00): Dag RSL 
Tip.. gebruik svp de PDOK actueel als achtergrond. BING is verouderd. 

MVG
eggie
volredman (2023-03-23 17:18:06+00:00): Legal olhar outros países ! Estive bem pertinho em Barcelona no final do ano passado !
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133980444
jmarchon (2023-03-22 15:13:29+00:00): Nice work! Looks like you accidentally put a question mark instead of a "1" into the phone number for the Hawley Creek Quarry.
Happy mapping!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133980481
kenken234 (2023-03-22 14:23:42+00:00): *Someone confused the bus service in JB (which has since been renumbered) with the one in SG
Hungerburg (2023-07-28 12:55:30+00:00): Da ist aber viel falsch. Darf ich fragen, welches "knowledge" dahinter steckt?
wermak (2023-07-30 23:31:16+00:00): Den dm hier gab es bereits und ist jetzt doppelt, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5741253376/history.
Hufkratzer (2023-03-22 21:24:06+00:00): Hi,
You have removed building=yes from
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/317638377,
therefore it is no longer rendered as a building.
Compare:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:building=riding_hall
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:leisure=horse_riding
emersonveenstra (2023-03-23 11:18:02+00:00): Hi,

You created this way, probably by accident, as a building: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1156321202
Would you mind going back and either fixing the tags or removing it? Thanks!
NiedernhausenerJunge (2023-07-05 10:56:29+00:00): Warum ist light_rail nicht gültig? Es ist ein offiziell existierender Wert, der auch auch anderen Relations verwendet wird (Inklusive anderer relations innerhalb der Stadtbahn Karlsruhe). Warum soll das hier ein Problem sein und dort nicht?
NiedernhausenerJunge (2023-07-05 11:04:28+00:00): In anderen Städten (bspw. Chemnitz, Saarbrücken, Mulhouse) wird für TramTrain Linien auch route = light_rail verwendet. In wieder anderen wie Kassel wird route = tram verwendet (was ich unpassend finde), aber Karlsruhe ist jetzt die einzige Stadt, in der route = train verwendet wird. Diese Weise die relations zu taggen wird sonst nirgends verwendet.
srbrook (2023-03-22 16:09:15+00:00): this is not a football pitch so have removed it
Geogast (2023-03-22 14:39:23+00:00): correct commentary: fotos (Wikimedia Commons)
Kovoschiz (2023-03-23 08:40:18+00:00): `name=` is for the most common name in existing public use.
Please discuss with the local community first before these changes. Use OpenHistoricalMap to show the full history.