piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
MatthieuMartin (2026-05-31 18:17:52+00:00): Bonjour Gronin,

Le nom sur le way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/352845973 est un nom descriptif.
Voir sur le wiki : "On entend par nom un choix arbitraire issu d'une dénomination en principe visible sur le terrain (Rue de la Mairie) et pas une description (Chemin départemental N°XX de Y à Z).

Le cadastre utilise souvent les noms génériques comme Chemin Rural, Chemin d'Exploitation ou Route Forestière comme ou Route de A vers B qui sont des descriptions et non des noms."
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Cartographie_des_routes_en_France#Noms_de_voies
et 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Cartographie_des_routes_en_France#Chemins_forestiers,_agricoles,_pistes
Bonne carto !
MatthieuMartin (2026-05-31 18:19:05+00:00): Grondin* désolé
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-08 02:05:37+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164657773
Fraxi (2025-03-03 15:54:26+00:00): Използвани и снимки от Bing Streetside
eggie (2025-03-03 16:14:39+00:00): Dag GU   oneway=no behoeft geen uitzonderingen voor tweewielers.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-03-03 16:18:53+00:00): aangepast
marczoutendijk (2025-03-04 19:02:43+00:00): Creating changesets this big is not a preferred practice on OSM.

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
eggie (2025-03-03 16:08:53+00:00): Dag GU Meestal zijn tweewielers uitgezonderd van oneway=yes..
Is dat hier het geval...
Dan toevoegen..
. oneway:bicycle=no en evt ook voor moped en mofa.
Mvg
eggie
eggie (2025-03-03 16:18:42+00:00): Uitzonderinge toegevoegd. Het zal anders niet routeren
https://smoothefiets.ddns.net/html/verkeersbordenkaart/index.php?lat=51.960189138&lng=5.837790370&z=19

MVG
eggie
silversurfer83 (2025-03-03 20:33:48+00:00): looks good :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163167822
silversurfer83 (2025-03-03 20:36:13+00:00): Hi :)

here you specifically asked for someone to check.

Here's my question: Does this highway really ford the stream or is there a bridge or a culvert at this point?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163167923
silversurfer83 (2025-03-10 08:09:47+00:00): Ahoi

little reminder that this question is still unanswered
silversurfer83 (2025-06-06 19:00:58+00:00): abester?
silversurfer83 (2025-07-13 16:00:37+00:00): fixed it

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168880187

do not connect highways and waterways if there is not really a ford there.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-03-03 16:31:42+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12626345202

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
archpdx (2025-03-05 04:40:20+00:00): It appears that you accidentally glued a power line to a road. I recommend unchecking 'Power Features' under 'Map Features' in the Map Data panel to prevent this from happening in the future.
archpdx (2025-03-05 05:02:28+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163228139
EZRouting (2025-03-05 13:38:09+00:00): Apologies, I will be more careful in the future.
Vinber-Pro (2025-03-26 16:47:54+00:00): Bonjour,
est-ce véritablement le nom de cette grotte ?
MrYodaylay (2025-03-08 15:40:56+00:00): For future reference:

I am rechecking all my changesets that list Council imagery as a source for copyright reasons. 

I do not believe any of the changes in this changeset are directly atrributable to the council imagery.

However, some of the objects are not visible in the DCS NSW Imagery either, so I can't definitely attribute them to a source. 

To stay on the safe side, I have attempted to partially revert the change (first time doing this, let's see how it goes). I chose to keep the trees, swingset, footpath adjustments, and changes to outline of play area as these are all confirmed in the DCS NSW Imagery.
MrYodaylay (2025-03-08 15:40:59+00:00): For future reference:

I am rechecking all my changesets that list Council imagery as a source for copyright reasons. 

See my comment on 163168603 for more details.
user_5359 (2025-03-06 17:59:40+00:00): Welcome to OSM! What is the mean of the tag airport-database = https://airportdatabase.net/albania/korce-northwest-airport_3970.html ? Did you mean source or source:url?
By the way: I can't find the source of this website. Is this page a permitted source of information for OSM purposes?
map per (2025-03-07 10:45:35+00:00): Wegen review_requested:

Dianatempel ist der üblichere Name für den Tempel, deshalb würde ich Hofgartentempel nur als alternativen Namen (alt_name) eintragen.

Viele Grüße
map per
Marek-M (2025-03-03 17:45:00+00:00): Poszczególnym domkom wypoczynkowym nie dopisujemy adresu, bo one adresu nie posiadają. Wystarczy dodać ten adres albo do głównego budynku (np. administracyjnego) albo do całego terenu z domkami.

Nazwy w OSM zapisujemy z wielkiej litery - nazwa 'RELAXO' powinna być zapisana w taki sposób: 'Relaxo'

Czy te poszczególne domki mają gdzieś tabliczki z nazwami 'RELAXO Domek 1'? Jeżeli mają tylko numer, to powinno się je zapisać nie jako `name=RELAXO Domek 1` a jako `ref=1`.

Basen i plac zabaw otrzymały tutaj nazwy opisowe, które są błędne. Wystarczająco dokładnie opisują je odpowiednie pozostałe tagi `leisure=*`

Poprawisz sam, czy Ci pomóc?
FajrAl (2025-05-26 04:42:39+00:00): kalau perumahan klaster itu pakai residential=gated, dan tidak perlu tag place=neighborhood. Tag place=neighborhood itu setara wilayah RW. Untuk Citra Sentul Raya itu baru pakai place=neighborhood.
Farras (2025-06-07 10:34:47+00:00): Terima kasih atas masukannya. Nanti saya sesuaikan di semua klaster.
DDD丶Samuel (2025-08-23 15:22:26+00:00): 您好，沈阳站接入了沈大高速线第三线，请抽空更新与此相关的道岔信息，谢谢
felipeeugenio (2025-03-03 16:56:02+00:00): Id	Contributor	Tmstmp UTC	Action	Comment
4649563	felipeeugenio	2025-03-03 17:51	closed	ok.
4649570	felipeeugenio	2025-03-03 17:51	closed	ok.
4649564	felipeeugenio	2025-03-03 17:51	closed	ok.
4649571	felipeeugenio	2025-03-03 17:51	closed	ok.
4649565	felipeeugenio	2025-03-03 17:51	closed	ok.
4649572	felipeeugenio	2025-03-03 17:51	closed	ok.
4649566	felipeeugenio	2025-03-03 17:51	closed	ok.
4649567	felipeeugenio	2025-03-03 17:51	closed	ok.
4649561	felipeeugenio	2025-03-03 17:51	closed	ok.
4649568	felipeeugenio	2025-03-03 17:51	closed	ok.
4649562	felipeeugenio	2025-03-03 17:51	closed	ok.
4649569	felipeeugenio	2025-03-03 17:51	closed	ok.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-03-03 17:11:03+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12633642238

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Geo-Tobi (2025-04-03 19:17:07+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/224635524
Das übliche Problem:  footway mit bicycle=designated. Das ist eine ungültige Kombi. Bitte um Korrektur.
archpdx (2025-03-05 04:45:26+00:00): Please be more careful in the future, it appears that this changeset broke this no right turn restriction relation: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16204805
SomeoneElse (2025-03-29 10:49:36+00:00): Hello MPFG,
It'd be great if the changeset comment here was a bit more descriptive, such as "added buildings to a suspiciously empty area in the east of Glasgow"
Best Regards,
Andy
Patrick78 (2025-03-11 19:23:29+00:00): Bonjour attention, les aires de repos sont fermées depuis le passage en flux libre 12/2024. J'ai corrigé cela dans un nouveau changeset. Il faudrait vérifier si vous avez fait des modifications sur les autres péages car là aussi, ils sont sans doute fermées (car plus d'arrêt des usagés).
NathanBnm (2025-03-12 08:36:18+00:00): Merci pour votre retour étant donné que les images aériennes datent de 2024  je ne pensais pas que cela avait été modifié depuis.
J'ai lu un article qui indique que d'ici 2027 le péage sera démoli et la route ramenée à 2x3 voies.
Il faudrait avoir des photos du terrain pour confirmer.
J'ai aussi lu que les 2 voies situées aux extrémités servaient actuellement à la circulation et que les voies centrales étaient condamnées.
Patrick78 (2025-03-12 09:07:38+00:00): Bonjour, effectivement les voies de droite typées camion sont utilisées comme toute de passage donc toujours sous le toit historique du péage. Pour les aires de repos, elles sont utilisées pour du stockage et sont fermées à l'usage. La démolition a bien avancé sur la partie centrale. J'ai pas de photos mais j'y passe tous les 2 mois env. Cdlt
NathanBnm (2025-03-12 09:20:17+00:00): D'accord merci je passe simplement le péage en flux libre et je vous laisse suivre l'avancée des travaux
meongseolin (2025-10-01 14:14:40+00:00): 至此，上海市乡级政区边界已全部完成
tomge (2025-09-01 08:28:36+00:00): Hallo, 

nach meinem  Verständnos werden tracks als access=no markiert, wenn sie nicht benutzt werden dürfen. Sie werden aber nicht enrfernt.  Hier sind jetzt einige mit removed versehen, die aber ja noch da sind.

Das passt nicht, oder?
Grüße, Thomas
silversurfer83 (2025-03-03 20:51:56+00:00): Moin 

du hast hier stellenweise maxspeed entfernt. War das Absicht?

Grüße
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163171014
espelicht (2025-03-04 05:40:04+00:00): huch, nein definitiv keine Absicht. Das muss ich wieder ändern, keine Ahnung wie das passiert ist.
silversurfer83 (2025-03-05 20:12:08+00:00): Alles klar. Danke
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163171014
wolfbert (2025-03-28 12:55:26+00:00): Hallo, Du hast da 2 Abschnitte der Donaulände mit maxspeed:type=AT:city bezeichnet. Den Wert gibt es so nicht. Was war denn da gemeint? Unmittelbar anschließend gilt 30er (sign).
waldhans (2025-03-28 13:05:09+00:00): Habe ich auf 30 gesetzt.

War vorher "maxspeed:type=AT:rural". Das dürfte dann ja auch falsch sein. Such mal danach.
wolfbert (2025-03-28 13:31:32+00:00): Soweit ich das sehen kann (Mapillary), ist das alles etwas verbesserungsbedürftig. Der ganze Bereich liegt wohl in einer 30er-Zone, ist aber maximal mit sign - oder gar nicht -  angegeben. ABer 30 ist schon mal gut.
Srdjan023 (2025-04-19 12:37:29+00:00): Is there a sign from trunk road? Because I can't see one on Mapillary.
Duja (2025-04-23 20:40:20+00:00): There is a sign for "No agricultural machinery or bicycles" at 
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=234514445099582
(and the same sign in westbound direction, https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=381333979915579&focus=photo)

Whether that's sufficient to signify a "trunk", I'm not sure. But the whole Y-krak, including roundabouts, should have the same classification (trunk or primary).
Srdjan023 (2025-05-19 16:08:38+00:00): мотопут је државни пут намењен искључиво за саобраћај мотоцикала, путничких возила, теретних возила и аутобуса, са или без прикључних возила и као такав обележен прописаним саобраћајним знаком

It needs this sign https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Road_signs_in_Serbia#/media/File:Serbia_road_sign_III-21.svg

That sign does not prohibit pedestrians, ATVs or similar vehicles so it's not trunk road legaly speeking.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-14 16:01:35+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9214300231/history has amenity = water that was added in this edit
amenity=water? What is this?

If it is place with drinking water amenity=drinking_water is typically
used.

man_made=water_tap may be added if it is a water tap.

man_made=water_tap with drinking_water=no is typically used to indicate
tap without drinking water

see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=water
Tom5734 (2025-05-14 16:10:00+00:00): man_made=water_tap
drinking_water=no
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-25 18:18:57+00:00): applied
mcliquid (2025-03-03 18:55:53+00:00): Revert after discussion

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163173958
Ruslan Fatih (2025-03-15 03:51:11+00:00): Бред
Anton Khorev (2025-03-17 11:20:03+00:00): Здравствуйте,

Вы на самом деле решили добавить лужу как водоём с названием "Лужа"? Если да, то возникает вопрос, зачем.

Глядя на обсуждение https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150492979 можно попробовать догадаться, что это некая форма активизма, когда вы рисуете лужу, чтобы отвечающие в данном месте за дренаж что-нибудь предприняли. Какая-нибудь карта с основой OpenStreetMap могла бы подойти для таких действий, но основная база данных OpenStreetMap для этого не предназначена.

С уважением,  
Антон Хорев  
Рабочая группа по данным
FraukeLeo (2026-01-21 11:54:44+00:00): Hallo TaunusLover, ich will das jetzt nicht einfach wieder zurückbauen, aber die Königsteiner Straße verläuft doch eigentlich schnurgerade. Die Straße als Ganzes meine ich. Wenn da die Fahrstreifen wegen wechselnder Parkstreifen mal einen Meter nach links oder rechts schwenken, als Beruhigungsmaßnahme, wär das für mich kein Grund für so einen Zickzack :)
TaunusLover573 (2026-01-21 16:27:28+00:00): Hey,
Die Straße verläuft in Zickzack. Die Parkflächen sind markiert. Es wäre lediglich eine sparmaßnahme sie gerade darzustellen. Die Teerdecke mag zwar durchgängig sein..
Es stört ja auch nicht. Ich finde es gut :)
TaunusLover573 (2026-01-21 16:29:42+00:00): Man unterscheidet ja auch zwischen Straße und Parkfläche, auch wenn sie aus dem gleichen Untergrund-Material beschaffen sind.
elsy1 (2025-03-04 09:29:53+00:00): درود، دوست عزیز تمام ویرایش های شما دارای خطا و اشتباهات فراوان هستند آیا متوجه هستید؟
elsy1 (2025-03-04 09:32:24+00:00): بنده ایرادات رو اصلاح کردم تشکر
Szymson (2025-03-03 18:50:52+00:00): Kolego, Ty się dobrze czujesz? To jest jeszcze plac budowy, a na pewno węzłów nie oznacza się na końcu łącznic włączania do ciągu głównego
JakubC (2025-04-21 14:29:24+00:00): Pierwszy raz próbowałem, ale oczywiście już wyzwiska...
grzegorz75jan (2025-04-21 18:10:48+00:00): Nie widzę tu wyzwisk.
Patrząc po komentarzach które otrzymałeś do kilku edycji to czas reakcji na nie jest żadem albo bardzo opóźniony.

Na ten odpowiedziałeś po dwóch miesiącach a w tym czasie Szymson nawet nie napisał ci tu nic ponownie.

W profilu piszesz, że masz zespół Aspergera. Weź pod uwagę, że ktoś inny może choćby być tylko nerwowy.

Różne rzeczy które widzimy przeglądając jakieś edycje po pewnym czasie potrafią wyprowadzić z równowagi.

Tu było naprawdę delikatnie. Sam mam gorszą opinię w środowisku.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163173534
JakubC (2025-04-22 06:45:00+00:00): Spoko. Mam po prostu wyłączone powiadomienia, stąd tak długa reakcja.

Najważniejsze że co miało być wyjaśnione, jest wyjaśnione.

Miłego dnia życzę.
grzegorz75jan (2025-04-22 08:21:12+00:00): Wyjaśnione, niewyjaśnione.

Większość czy to nowych edytujących czy starszych ma jak to określiłeś "po prostu wyłączone powiadomienia"

a ktoś inny ma być spokojny i cierpliwy oraz ma poprawiać po takich rysujących sami dla siebie.

Wiedz o tym że w takich przypadkach każdy sensownie edytujący może po prostu wycofać takie edycje oraz rzucić ciężką wiązanką.
MissMarcoPolo (2025-04-08 18:41:01+00:00): Hi Kerploonk!
I hope you’re having a great day. I appreciate your efforts towards improving Iceland’s roads. However, I was hoping to get some clarity regarding the ref tags updates made in this changeset. Would you be able to share the resource used that supports these updates?
Looking forward to your insights - thanks for your time!
Kerploonk (2025-04-08 22:34:22+00:00): Hi MissMarcoPolo,

The updated ref tagging is based on Vegaskrá 2024, a public document in Icelandic published by the Icelandic Highway Administration (Vegagerðin), available for download from https://www.vegagerdin.is/samgongukerfid/vegakerfid/vegir .
According to OSM wiki ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Iceland ) it's a public domain document that can be used as a source for highway names and refs.

The document is quite heavy and local knowledge is often needed to decipher the alignment of the roads. The data from Vegaskrá is also published as a GIS feature by LMÍ (National Land Survey of Iceland) under the IS 50 V set of GeoPackages for features in Iceland ( https://gatt.natt.is/geonetwork/srv/eng/catalog.search#/metadata/41D3314D-55AF-4FE3-9A9F-B9CB18AC5CAA ).
The IS 50 V geopackage from LMÍ is licenced under a revised version of the UK "Open Government Licence" ( https://www.lmi.is/is/moya/page/licence-for-national-land-survey-of-iceland-free-data ).
I have personally refrained from using the data directly as I am not sure whether data under this licence may be used on OSM.

Cheers.
MissMarcoPolo (2025-04-17 17:11:00+00:00): Hello Kerploonk, Thank you for the detailed information regarding the resources used to inform your edits. I appreciate your insights, and hope you have a wonderful day!
Fizzie-DWG (2025-03-21 03:58:57+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17425
gscholz (2025-03-08 07:52:55+00:00): Hi remimage,
this changeset created several errors regarding self intersecting ways:


https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=8.98057&lat=13.81910&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=163173668

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Endres Pelka (2025-03-04 18:57:50+00:00): What's this 650 meters long building stretched across the city? Reverting
Endres Pelka (2025-03-04 18:59:37+00:00): Reverted in 163215142
silversurfer83 (2025-03-05 20:03:14+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap

thank you for keeping the database up to date :)

There are a few things I'd like to point out:

- your comments could use some improving since the changeset comment is supposed to help other people understand what you did and why you did it. "Fixed some things" is rather random and unhelpful. Please see 
 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

for guidance.

- I don't know why you touched the waterway down in Florida. It created a so called bounding box covering the Eastern seaboard. This is something we try to avoid. Here's the wiki on that:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

- Nice work with the pier. It just needs to be connected to the closest piece of "road". That allows for routing. Right now it's isolated from the highway network.

- OSM is a collaborative effort. You'll find other active people in many different places online. There's a forum at c.osm.org where you can ask for help and there are quite some chat groups which are listed here
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contact_channels#Chats.2Fmessengers

happy mapping
silversurfer83
skorasaurus (2026-01-10 16:47:14+00:00): Hi, 

Thanks for your prolific edits and work with Peoplewithbikes in Cleveland. I noticed that you had changed several ways https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/11804316/history/7 ; https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/126400482; https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/11801265 ; https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/11787875 (is just a small subset of these) that had surface=brick to surface=paving_stones

Although surface=brick isn't documented in the wiki, it had been used as a defacto tag for tagging brick ways 

My concern with replacing surface=brick with surface=paving_stones is that paving_stones is much more broader and can represent a variety of stones/bricks (e.g. ones listed at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface%3Dpaving_stones) 

I'm writing to ask, in case if you are still editing in cleveland (i don't believe that you are); if you'll continue that pattern. 
I'll follow up with other local editors for their thoughts.
pkoby (2026-01-10 16:49:57+00:00): Hi there,

Sorry for the edits contrary to local convention. Are you comfortable retagging these, or should I take a look and try to fix it?

I'm not currently editing in Cleveland, but I have family from the area, so if I'm ever mapping back in the area, I'll keep this in mind.

Peter
Đuro Jiří (2025-03-09 20:39:53+00:00): Ciao Alessandro, strade in questione non sono highway=trunk, però highway=primary. E non è nemmeno giusto motorroad=yes,io sono passato a piedi così tante volte, che non ricordo nemmeno quante. 
Ripristinato
eggie (2025-03-03 20:50:48+00:00): Hi...
The routing will do the job, but.... 
 I think seen from the north the entrance is only oneway with lanes=2
The will merge after the island into oneway (lanes2)
There is no wall of barrier between the ways. 
The ways split more to the south. near the entrance.
Greetz,
eggie
user_22460680 (2025-03-03 21:08:28+00:00): Hi eggie, thank you again
I moved the splits closer to the garage entrance and following the road signage
RedAuburn (2025-03-03 19:29:31+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3357916
neloquerol (2025-03-22 18:41:37+00:00): Hola Jordi,
Veig que a la carretera que va de l'Hostalet de Vilar de Canes a la Venta l'Aire, que és la CV-128 que passa per Catí, ara, des de fa uns dies porta per nom "Carretera Todolella - Olocau del Rey".
Sem bla que és per una importació que vas fer tu. Mira què ha passat.
Gràcies!!!
Jordi MF (2025-03-22 20:47:42+00:00): Hola Nelo,

El nom de les carreteres el trac del Decret de Carreteres de la Generalitat Valenciana. Si alguna de les carreteres creus que hauria de tindre un altre nom, em pareix bé que eixe nom aparega en l'etiqueta 'name', però crec que val la pena mantindre el nom de la carretera com a 'official_name'.

Ara no ho puc mirar en detall, però si he llevat un nom més habitual i he afegit el nom oficial del Decret, estic a favor de recuperar el nom habitual.
Jordi MF (2025-03-23 13:33:33+00:00): Ah... No et vaig entendre bé... Vaig copiar malament el nom, segur. És impossible que esta carretera s'anomene així. Gràcies per l'avís! Avui ho intentaré corregir.
neloquerol (2025-03-23 13:55:51+00:00): Doncs, haurà passat alguna cosa amb la importació. He trobat l'annex I al DECRET 46/2019, de 22 de març, del Consell, d’aprovació del Catàleg del Sistema Viari de la Comunitat Valenciana. [2019/3352]
i apareix correctament:

CV-128 Venta del Segarró - Venta de l’Aire
(per Catí)

No sé si és el mateix que has utilitzat tu.
neloquerol (2025-03-23 13:57:18+00:00): Perdó, no havia llegit el teu darrer missatge.
Jordi MF (2025-03-23 19:00:23+00:00): Hola Nelo,

Ja ho he corregit. Crec que, ara, no m'he equivocat. Gràcies de nou!
silversurfer83 (2025-03-03 20:48:13+00:00): Hello :)

two questions/remarks re this edit:

- https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12634080353 could you please check this "zebra crossing". It looks like you misplaced it.

- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1364334076 what kind of way through the building is this? Simply a passage free for all? Maybe visit https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tunnel%3Dbuilding_passage and see if this fits

happy mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163175289
arno (2025-03-03 21:40:57+00:00): Thanks for the hint. I just copied the pathes from 70 meters to the ENE and didn't realise there was a zebra crossing. ;-) Yes, it's just a broad passage. —Arno
RedAuburn (2025-03-03 19:47:37+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4649737
eggie (2025-03-03 21:14:16+00:00): Hoi,

De magische validator van editor JOSM heeft er vrede mee.
Zelf moet ik toch ook steeds weer opzoeken hoe die openingstijden werken.
Vandaar dat ik meestal het tooltje gebruik.
Mapse
eggie
Lennardderudder (2025-05-13 12:57:18+00:00): Het fietspad aan de spoorwegovergang van de Schoolstraat heeft nu als tag access=no. Is dit omdat daar werken zijn of is er een andere reden voor?
Frans S (2025-05-04 10:16:30+00:00): Hello. 
Thanks for mapping.
You marked this as a hamlet.
Why?  No proof of any buildings here, nor human activity (traces of paths etc.) 
I remove this mapping.
Best regards