piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
stasiu512 (2025-07-10 14:48:03+00:00): dziękuję
NeisBot (2025-07-02 10:39:46+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-07-05 19:40:49+00:00): 👎 Already (partly) reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/168408981
NorthCrab_upload (2025-07-02 10:41:03+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5749682188

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NeisBot (2025-07-02 10:42:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description
NeisRevert (2025-07-02 12:06:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/168395302
where the changeset comment is: 
Remove vandalism
mavl (2025-07-02 14:28:54+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок добавляет дорогу (Краеведческую улицу) прямо на другую дорогу.  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1148115691  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1411428215  
  
Это ошибка. Дороги не должны накладываться друг на друга.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Good_practice
pavvv (2025-07-02 11:06:34+00:00): No nie wiem, czy jest w tym jakiś sens. Droga nie spełnia wymogu na primary.
kornad (2025-07-04 06:55:02+00:00): Jaki sens ma podniesienie tego krótkiego odcinka Płażyńskiego do trunk? Skoro już przedłużać to dlaczego nie do miejsca gdzie kończy się bezkolizyjność tej drogi, czyli do stacji BP?
pavvv (2025-07-05 20:44:05+00:00): @szalona_entropia albo obniż ten fragment do secondary albo przeciągnij trunk dalej wg powyższego komentarza
bartgron (2025-07-02 11:46:55+00:00): Moim zdaniem powinno zostać tak jak było bo powinna być kategoria odpowiednia dla drogi docelowej
szalona_entropia (2025-07-02 11:51:31+00:00): W Polsce stosujemy takie zasady: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:OpenStreetMap_Highway_links_table_between_different_highway_types..png
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Highway_link
bartgron (2025-07-02 11:54:06+00:00): Ok to mnie przekonuje
NeisRevert (2025-07-02 12:06:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/168395278
where the changeset comment is: 
Remove vandalism
aceman444 (2026-04-17 22:39:10+00:00): Dobry den, su tieto historicke nazvy este dnes relevantne? Existuju aj v nejakom sucasnom zdroji?
mavl (2025-07-02 13:56:30+00:00): Здравствуйте. Подскажите, пожалуйста, почему "Чудесная улица" переименована в "улица Чудесная"?
Yury_77772 (2025-07-02 14:48:37+00:00): Добрый день, на основании Распоряжения Администрации города Тюмени №1-рк от 14.01.2025
1. Присвоить   элементу  улично-дорожной   сети,   расположенному   в
границах населенного пункта город Тюмень городского округа город Тюмень
Тюменской   области   Российской   Федерации   согласно   приложению   к
настоящему распоряжению, наименование — улица Чудесная.
mavl (2025-07-02 15:16:38+00:00): Это не причина для переименования улицы в OpenStreetMap. В OpenStreetMap улицы именуются в соответствии с соглашением.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BE%D0%B1_%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3  
  
По этому соглашению улица должна называться "Чудесная улица". Именно так она и называлась до этого дня.
HellMap (2026-05-26 14:09:40+00:00): Šajā izmaiņā nodzēsts mikroliegums https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1372418590 bez paskaidrojuma. Tas ir atjaunots.
NeisRevert (2025-07-02 12:05:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/168395266
where the changeset comment is: 
Remove vandalism
eggie (2025-07-02 11:03:02+00:00): Dag Remkicht.. Goed om te weten dat we in OSM bijtaggen op de bestaande adresnode en niet op de gebouwomtrek.
Ook svp geen adresgegevens op gebouwen zetten.  De AH is hier toch al gemapt op de adresnode?  Waarom dan AH 2x op de kaart?
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-07-02 11:07:07+00:00): Dag Remlicht.. Ik heb de adres- en bedrijfsinfo weer verwijderd. De extra info heb ik verplaatst naar de adresnode.

MVG
eggie
Remlicht89 (2025-07-02 11:55:09+00:00): Helder, mijn fout. Bedankt voor het meekijken.
NeisBot (2025-07-02 11:01:09+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
AnvayaHealthcare (2025-07-02 11:22:24+00:00): Sure
Always_Dreamin (2025-07-13 04:16:06+00:00): Hey,

Welcome to OSM! It appears you are a relatively new mapper. I thought I'd offer some corrections to your edits. It appears you changed the building type for Way 839751732 from cathedral to church. Was there a reason for this? Also, it appears a few tags were removed from the building and placed on the new amenity node. The amenity repeats data from the building when it is usually simpler and cleaner to only have a single set of tags attached to the building. That varies when multiple amenities inhabit a building. Anyway, I hope you are having fun and I look forward to your reply.

Sincerely,
Always_Dreamin
FroschForscher (2025-07-02 15:10:29+00:00): Hallo TheoWgt,
handelt es sich hierbei um eine Informationstafel/stele? Ein Monument im sinne von OSM ist hier sehr unwahrscheinlich.

FroschForscher
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168393003
TheoWgt (2025-07-14 16:08:07+00:00): Hallo FroschForscher, das ist richtig. Ich bin noch "Lernender" hier. Hatte keine passendere Zuordnung gefunden.
Ich werde die Korrektur versuchen.
Danke für Deinen Hinweis
FroschForscher (2025-08-27 16:44:10+00:00): Hallo TheoWgt, ich habe es leider noch nicht geschafft hier zu antworten.
Die korrekten Eigenschaften wurden jetzt von cuzi in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171090032 gesetzt.
Baloo Uriza (2025-07-03 13:08:22+00:00): Something useful to add is the street name for the sidewalk.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168393767
micheleOSM3 (2025-07-02 13:37:58+00:00): Non sono sicuro che highway=ladder sia il modo migliore di mappare questa scala perché non è una semplice scala, è dotata anche del cavo di assicurazione tipico delle ferrate. Io avrei lasciato highway=via_ferrata e aggiunto ladder=yes come previsto negli attributi aggiuntivi previsti per le ferrate https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dvia_ferrata
micheleOSM3 (2025-07-02 15:47:29+00:00): Inoltre via_ferrata_scale senza highway=via_ferrata non ha molto senso
molensteen (2025-07-02 11:36:03+00:00): soms is hier en daar een stukje gras zonder struiken maar grosso modo is het bos en struiken
eggie (2025-07-02 17:10:05+00:00): Dag Molensteen... Lijkt me oke zo.
gr eggie
molensteen (2025-07-02 17:55:18+00:00): dankjewel voor het nakijken eggie
gr molensteen
Filip009 (2025-07-03 12:51:41+00:00): Zdravím, cyklopruhy sú uvedené na ceste 1. triedy ako lane, nie je nutné ich pridávať explicitne ako cyklochodníky, keďže nie sú nijak stavebne od cesty oddelené.
123123Matej (2025-07-07 19:41:13+00:00): Aha, ďakujem za informáciu.
Dodko (2025-07-22 08:29:32+00:00): Prečo budovy ako Lidl a Tesco rušíte budovu ako obchod a dávate samostatný POI bod? to má význam ak je v budove viacero malých obchodíkov, ale nie ak je celá veľká budova obchodom.
Hlavná budova mala ostať obchodom a drobné prevádzky pridať ako body.
Dodko (2025-07-22 08:35:39+00:00): Nesprávny názov ulice
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1411401817/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/553136189/history
holubekp (2025-07-22 15:23:55+00:00): Robím aj u iných budov kvôli prehľadnosti.
 Pokiaľ ponechám budovu ako obchod, názov obchodu v mape prekryje dôležitý údaj - súpisné číslo budovy.
OSM Wiki v časti "Ako mapovať" dovoľuje aj použitie POI bodu: 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:shop%3Dsupermarket
multimob (2025-07-02 13:31:48+00:00): Ne pas effacer les arrêts d'OSM svp.
S'il y a une erreur de données-sources chez TEC, le signaler avec une note + changer les tags, sinon l'arrêt sera importé à nouveau.
user_5359 (2025-07-03 09:54:44+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You use the keys to import data with unclear license
geocoded_coordinate (not needed!)
google_cover_photo_url 
google_place_id
You use wrongs keys
logo_url instead of logo
payment_options = with a list of values
Use wrong notation 
opening_hours = monday-thursday 07:30-12:00,13:00-17:30; friday 07:30-12:00,13:00-17:00; saturday-sunday off
Please stop the import, delete the unwanted data and correct the wrong keys!
fs_LT (2025-07-28 06:50:31+00:00): this CS should be reverted
user_5359 (2025-07-28 10:13:33+00:00): Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/changeset/168438018
fs_LT (2025-07-28 10:30:35+00:00): thx
YomanNH (2025-07-02 13:20:27+00:00): Dzięki za kawał dobrze wykonanej roboty!
Yog Sot (2025-07-02 15:22:28+00:00): fajne drzewa i inne detale, ale przypominam area:highway to nie jest oficjalnie zaakceptowany tag, dlatego highway=pedestrian musi zostać przywrócone dla całego tego placu, a zostało skasowane. 
Temat został omówiony na forum, jednakże jak widać, części respondentów niestety nie interesuje zgodnośc danych z oczekiwaniami wydawców zewnętrznych aplikacji.
Anas masuris (2025-07-02 15:29:45+00:00): Ten obszar nie spełnia także definicji highway=pedestrian, gdyż ruch jest ukierunkowany osiowo (tak jak w przypadku uliczek na rynkach) ani też nie jest to plac:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpedestrian

Sam status area:highway jest "de facto", tak jak wielu innych kluczy, z których ochoczo korzystasz:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Key_descriptions_with_status_%22de_facto%22

I czytałem forum (inaczej bym tego nie zrobił ani tam nie komentował) xd
Yog Sot (2025-07-02 16:33:59+00:00): no właśnie ruch nie jest ukierunkowany osiowo. mozna chodzic nie po osi i całkiem daleko dojść w linii prostej, co przedstawiłem. 
To, że zmapowałem ściezki na tym placu, służy wyłącznie nawigacjom, które nie potrafią po placach. 
Tak samo stary rynek jest w osi bardzo szerokiej drogi wokół ratusza, ale całość jest oznaczona jako plac, a dla większości nawigacji, drogi są zmapowane. 

Tak czy siak, dzięki za mape drzew. robiłeś to z satelity czy z inwentaryzacji?
aceman444 (2025-08-10 23:22:37+00:00): Hi, what are you trying to do here?

What "better approximation of entrance/exit angle"? Who does approximate what? The angles are now all wrong and not how the exit roads are laid out and how the vehicle will move.
Gregory Peony (2025-07-03 01:08:11+00:00): Do you know how many people live here? Just becasue a tag can be applied doesn't mean it should.--- this area should not have been added and is incorrectly tagged. It should be yellow when correct. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168396225
Gregory Peony (2025-07-02 13:12:00+00:00): Individual buildings like this should not be mapped as hamlets. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168396268
Gregory Peony (2025-07-02 13:14:07+00:00): The  features enveloped by the likely hedge here appear to be trees and not buildings so this is not a settlement. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168396313
Gregory Peony (2025-07-02 17:50:46+00:00): Check Changeset: 168411254 to see how I replaced these with the footprints of individual buildings. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168396369
Gregory Peony (2025-07-03 01:13:42+00:00): The buildings here are close enough to be considered one settlement; only one area is required to envelope them. The two smaller areas use the correct tag of landuse=residential but the larger one does not. Populations can be estimated but to get the actual number you'd likely have to conduct a survey or use other sources of information than aerial photos. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168396405
justynabu (2026-06-14 18:14:50+00:00): Why there's no access on this bridge?
CorruptComputer (2025-07-02 23:45:20+00:00): I think something went wrong with this changeset, all of the nodes added here are at (0,0).
CorruptComputer (2025-07-02 23:54:21+00:00): This has been reverted by changeset/168420651
Metzor (2025-07-07 22:03:34+00:00): I sent an eMail to the support of the company behind those changesets to stick to community guidelines and answer in the discussions. 
Let's see if they'll reply. Otherwise dwg...
mylokalesuche (2025-07-08 07:44:06+00:00): Thank you for pointing this out and for reverting the changeset – much appreciated.

You're right, this changeset was the result of a test that unintentionally pushed invalid data to (0,0). That was not our intention, and we apologize for the confusion and the extra work it caused.

We're currently reviewing our process and will make sure that all future contributions strictly follow the Organised Editing Guidelines and community expectations.
Gregory Peony (2025-07-02 13:56:36+00:00): You correctly updated the value of the place POIs here but the residential areas should be tagged as landuse=residential and traced more accurately. The area of the northern settlement is around 2/3 of what you mapped it as: this affects population estimates. Quality over quantity. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168396593
AkuAnakTimur (2025-07-02 14:59:32+00:00): NBCT ni masalah sikit sebab papan tanda memang dalam bahasa Inggeris... tapi tak pasti la kalau dah ada papan tanda premis dah letak nama bahasa Melayu
voschix (2026-04-28 16:47:25+00:00): Ciao.
Il tagging di  Via Alcide de Gasperi (1411462857) non mi sembra coretto: se mi descrivi la situazione, posso darti una mano. Sono passato di recente e mi sembra che questo tratto di Via de Gaspari sia a senso unico in direzione sudest, con una corsia di autobus contromano.  Puoi confermare?
Albertoooooo0 (2026-04-28 16:57:53+00:00): ciao si, praticamente dalla palestra verso l'intersezione con via Calatafimi possono passare tutti, al contrario invece è ztl e quindi solo gli autorizzati passano(bus, vigli, comune, ecc...)
FroschForscher (2025-07-02 20:03:44+00:00): Hallo Reutlingendorf, möchtest du einmal erklären warum du hier building=yes entfernt hast?

FroschForscher
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168396888
Gregory Peony (2025-07-03 01:01:24+00:00): Do not delete local information like this unless you're sure it should be removed. Unlike most other features which should be deleted if there is evidence of their non-existence. Place names can still be useful even if the settlement they were named after is no longer there.--- Fret not; I restored this element and tagged it as a locality. See my resolution in Changeset: 168421426. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168396986
Gregory Peony (2025-07-02 13:03:09+00:00): Welcome to OSM! The residential areas should not be tagged with place=, a central point in the settlement should be tagged with place=. You correctly identified residential areas in the imagery but drew them quite qrudely, please map them more accurately in future; this aids in more accurate population estimates. See how I mapped it in Changeset 168397713. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168397283
Gregory Peony (2025-07-02 23:55:02+00:00): You correctly identified and tagged both the POI and Residential area. If the residential area were more accurate that'd be excellent. I find that adding an extra node on some corners can make the areas easier to draw accurately.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168397384
Gregory Peony (2025-07-03 00:00:18+00:00): Welcome to OSM! This residential area does not envelope a settlement and is incorrectly tagged. There is no accompanying place POI. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168397388
Gregory Peony (2025-07-02 15:57:31+00:00): You mapped individual buildings as settlements. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168397498
Gregory Peony (2025-07-02 13:46:50+00:00): You correctly identified this settlement as a village but the POI tagging should have been updated; not the residential areas. I chose to delete one of the residential areas and envelope the settlement with just one. See how I mapped it in Changeset: 168400239. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168397517
Gregory Peony (2025-07-02 15:37:31+00:00): These are not hamlets. Though there are buildings at the two sites I flagged, they are likely communication infrastructure so the landuse wouldn't be residential. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168397751
Gregory Peony (2025-07-02 15:08:38+00:00): You are envelping settlements with areas but they should be tagged as landuse=residential and have a Place=* POI. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168397761
vrix (2025-07-05 12:33:05+00:00): Hi borovac, I think that this changeset caused some issues between Izmir (R223167) and Konak (R1269255). In fact, Konak is not a child of Izmir anymore (and I think it should be, since Konak is a district in Izmir according to wikipedia), you can check this in Nominatim for example https://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/ui/search.html?q=R1269255

Could you please give this changeset a second check? Thank you
borovac (2025-07-05 12:54:36+00:00): Hi vrix,
My modification should not cause problems, because I only added back "way141141948" to be inside Izmir relation to close broken relation. 
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/relation/223167 

But I can certainly check on Monday in more detail. As far as I can see Konak is part of Izmir relation, Konak is subarea inside Izmir relation.
Gregory Peony (2025-07-02 15:26:59+00:00): Crude geomerty, incorrect tagging, and no place POI. See my project comment. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168397838
Gregory Peony (2025-07-02 15:22:27+00:00): Don't tag individual buildings as settlements. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168397860