piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2026-01-24 10:27:37+00:00): Dag HJS,

Je vraagt feedback 
Kennelijk was er toch iets niet goed aan die knooppuntroute, want er is e.e.a. hersteld in deze changeset..
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1243634/history/22

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-01-24 10:29:35+00:00): https://knooppuntnet.nl/en/analysis/changeset/177618841/6956353

en

https://knooppuntnet.nl/en/analysis/changeset/177621315/6956417
JJIglesias (2026-01-25 19:15:24+00:00): Por favor la RN47 (F47) hasta donde se sabe NO INCLUYE ningún tramo hacia Rodeo Porvenir o Rendencion Pampa desde la RN6. 

No se de donde sacas esta informacion, tienes alguna fuente oficial? (Ley Nacional, Mapa de la ABC, vias Bolivia etc?) a Octubre 2025 la F47 en los mapas NO INCLUIA ningun tramo por esa zona.

Gracias
5m4u9 (2026-01-26 03:00:15+00:00): Hola, esta ruta que marcas como F47 no es la correcta. La F47 va del sur de camargo -> padilla (F6) -> parte de F38 mal marcada (hasta la frontera scz).  más o menos así-> https://graphhopper.com/maps/?point=-20.875233%2C-65.228211&point=-20.783758%2C-64.870189&point=-20.104839%2C-64.413824&point=-18.721899%2C-64.316495&profile=car&layer=OpenStreetMap

Revertiré el cambio!
JJIglesias (2026-01-26 07:43:15+00:00): Segun el Mapa de la RVF de Octubre-2025 la F47 va desde Arquillos en la F6 hasta Cruce Saladillo en la F1 (al sur de Camargo) para una distancia total de 362 kms. El Segmento Guadalupe-Tomina al Norte de la F6 corresponde a la F38. Ambas vias las he circulado en algun momento en los últimos 5 años. Simples caminos de tierra.

No existe NINGUN segmento de la RVF entre F6-Rodeo Porvenir-Redención Pampa-Mojocoya y Puente Inca. Via que también he hecho varias veces.

Gracias
NeisBot (2026-01-24 07:44:06+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13478805524 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Skup złomu"
---
Na przykład, bardziej neutralna i obiektywna wersja Twojego tekstu mogłaby brzmieć: "Skup złomu"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
YomanNH (2026-01-26 16:45:48+00:00): Hej,
po pierwsze opis jest do usunięcia, bo to zwykła reklama, a takich rzeczy do OpenStreetMap nie dodajemy. Po drugie, jakie są godziny otwarcia? W opening_hours dałeś co innego, niż w opisie-reklamie.
Kampel (2026-01-26 17:01:57+00:00): Skorygowane zgodnie z uwagami.
YomanNH (2026-01-26 17:24:04+00:00): Dzięki!
Kampel (2026-01-26 17:26:47+00:00): Uczę się. To ja dziękuję za uwagi. Pozdrawiam.
pitscheplatsch (2026-01-26 17:30:00+00:00): 👍
yelisey90 (2026-01-23 20:40:41+00:00): Hmm... I guess *some* way or relation should keep landuse=residential... Can't say that I find them anyhow useful, but many people do... And no this are just lacks any landuse tags...
Jk488 (2026-01-23 20:57:41+00:00): The neighborhoods include some non-residential areas and I assumed it'd be better to remove the tag, I think all the ones that I previously modified didn't have such a tag. Should I add it back?
yelisey90 (2026-01-23 22:12:35+00:00): No, it's better to separate landuse tagging and place name tagging... Probably some new ways/relations for landuses should be added...
NeisBot (2026-01-24 07:44:08+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/356855937 v5

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Menswear store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-01 07:00:46+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177952745
(No visible changes after review)
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-01-23 18:47:14+00:00): Thanks for a fix!
literan (2026-01-24 10:15:50+00:00): правильный формат адреса: 9 с1

с пробелом и буква "с" маленькая
marcmarti (2026-01-23 21:00:44+00:00): Please stop making changesets spanning the entire world. Wikipedia is not a valid source
ivanbranco (2026-01-23 21:10:13+00:00): The wiki saya:
"Do not copy any information from Wikipedia into OSM. Wikipedia is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0 which is incompatible with OSM. In addition, we are much stricter on copyright than the Wikipedia is"
ceirios (2026-01-23 22:20:54+00:00): Please don't blindly copy from Wikipedia.

The Welsh Wikipedia is absolutely terrible with placenames and has their own unofficial style that is not used by any non-Wiki user.

Thankfully the name:cy tags you added don't need to be changed, but please don't copy from Wikipedia.

Diolch
Ceirios
Rainero (2026-03-18 14:29:10+00:00): Revert mit changeset/180061548
(unzulässige Quelle)
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-01-23 18:53:16+00:00): thanks for processing those notes!

(I was relatively sure about these changes but not enough to make them remotely from another continent)
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-23 19:53:41+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1469853527

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eggie (2026-01-24 07:53:50+00:00): Hi.. Is Caravan Mieke the name of the property or owners info?
Gr eggie
NeisBot (2026-01-24 07:35:56+00:00): Hello tinonino, welcome to OSM, and thank you for your contributions!

I've taken a look at your recent edits and wanted to discuss a few discrepancies I noticed regarding the surrounding environmental features. Specifically, the locations in your edits don't seem to align with the typical geographical characteristics expected in that area. Here are some (max 10) relevant links to the edits:
https://osm.org/node/13479724742
https://osm.org/relation/20130856

Could you please take a look?
Looking forward to your response.

#Somewhere
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177622292
pitscheplatsch (2026-01-24 14:19:27+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177636310
GerdP (2026-01-24 06:49:04+00:00): Moin aus Wildeshausen!
Könntest Du bitte bei Deinen Änderungen mit angeben, ob Du die Daten vor Ort gesammelt hast (survey), oder ob Du die Daten z.B. von ALKIS übernommen hast? Ausserdem fände ich es prima, bei der Gelegenheit auch building=yes zu präzisieren, z.B. house,detached oder semi_detached etc. und evtl. grob gezeichnete Umrisse zu verbessern.
Sylvain M (2026-03-04 16:24:38+00:00): Salut @zouloukk
Super d'avoir cartographié toutes ces haies dans le secteur.
Par contre, tu as utilisé le tag natural=tree_row, là où j'aurais plutôt utilisé barrier=hedge :
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:barrier%3Dhedge

Pour moi, "natural=tree_row" est utile pour les alignements d'abres qui ne forment pas de haies (souvent des peupliers ou des platanes par exemple), tandis que les haies ont généralement une strate arbustive dense et impénétrable, jouant le rôle de clôture (d'où la classification dans la catégorie des "barrier").
Mais c'est vrai que la distinction est un peu subjective.
Le sujet a été abordé dans ce fil de discussion :
https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/talus-haies-et-bocage
N'hésite pas à y participer si tu n'es pas de mon point de vue !
A+
DemiurgRoma (2026-01-24 11:42:11+00:00): slave2525 dlaczego dopuszczasz się wandalizmu? Idź i się lecz.
旧加卷 (2026-01-24 07:58:39+00:00): node/13479724742 and relation/20130856 have been removed for the following reasons:
Relations tagged with “ type=waterway ” are not for seas, but for "waterways". This tag should not be applied to relation/20130856.
node/13479724742 is missing a tag that describes what it represents.
It is incorrect to tag “wikimedia_commons” as a url, especially when the given url redirects to the path of an image (rather than Wikimedia Commons information page).
rarad74 (2026-01-23 19:37:16+00:00): Cand o sa caolabeorezu cu utilizatorii de aici si o sa ascutli ce ti se spune, o sa iti ramana editarile. Pana atunci REVERT!!!
Comino (2026-01-24 10:14:42+00:00): Hi,

Does this café accept Bitcoin?
You added:

currency:XBT=yes
So Butcoin YES

payment:lightning=no
payment:lightning_contactless=no
payment:onchain=no
So Bitcoin NO

The tags contradict each other.
Could you please adjust this?

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Comino
https://btcmap.org/tagger/6794624
402 (2026-02-01 20:24:23+00:00): my mistake. yes, they accept it through "snap to scan" a third-party, who accpets BTC payments
Comino (2026-02-01 21:07:31+00:00): Thanks for making to adjustment.
Unfortunately, there are more tagging mistakes...

Egret St
should be
Egret Street

Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa
should be
Cape Town

Instagram is not a website, please use the contact:Instagram=* tag

- What’s the phone number?
- Does this bar only accept Bitcoin over NFC?
Most likely also through the Lightning network. Please change that tag.

Edwin Comino
402 (2026-02-06 08:00:59+00:00): @Comino many thanks for your suggestions. 

I surveyed there again. They do not provide a phone no. only contact via instag. and their payment provider SnapScan discontinued the integration with lighting payments for now
Comino (2026-02-06 08:46:12+00:00): Thank you for making the necessary adjustments.
NeisBot (2026-01-24 07:44:10+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13479766355 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Advertising agency"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-01 07:00:48+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177952746
(Cleaned up leftovers from previous edits)
rarad74 (2026-01-23 19:35:10+00:00): NU POti sa aliniezi cu Bing map. Imaginile sunt vechi si proaste. REVERT . O sa iti sterg tot ce ai modificat pana o sa renunti idiotule!!! Ca nu esti pe maidan la ma-ta. Ia-ti pastilele ca esti nebun!!!
Cayenne17 (2026-01-24 18:26:03+00:00): Bonsoir,
J'ai rajouter le numéro de SIRET sur les 2 que vous avez ajouté.

J'avais une question à propos de Scidiam. Est-ce que vous avez eu les horaires ?
Ce n'est pas les mêmes que je retrouve sur leurs site internet que celle que vous avez renseigné dans OSM.
Davidos64 (2026-01-25 07:11:06+00:00): Bonjour, 

Il s'agit probablement d'une erreur de ma part lorsque j'ai renseigné l'entreprise. En effet, il s'agit bel et bien de ceux du site qu'il faut renseigné. Vous pouvez faire la modification de l'horaire
Cayenne17 (2026-01-25 13:12:00+00:00): Bonjour,
Merci pour la réponse.
Je viens de corriger dans changeset 177680860 : https://osm.org/changeset/177680860
https://osmcha.org/changesets/177680860

Bonne journée.
cowboyxup (2026-01-23 20:30:32+00:00): Please do not just add public_transport=platform to highway=bus_stop if the platform is mapped seperatly, especially if the node is tagged with 'not:public_transport	platform'. Please include the platform way instead. 
Happy Mapping
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2026-01-27 03:03:43+00:00): This changeset connected a bridge to the road it crosses
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177624722
pwbriggs (2026-01-23 21:04:22+00:00): Thanks for the contribution. The camera isn't part of the road, so it should be disconnected from the load line. Where exactly is the camera? In the median between the 2 directions? Or just north/south of this segment of Medina Circle road?
Benefice (2026-01-23 21:06:42+00:00): Thanks, This is my first contribution. It is on the median between the two directions.
Benefice (2026-01-23 21:10:20+00:00): I have moved it top the median and unattached it from the road.
NeisBot (2026-01-24 07:44:12+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13401545088 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Nail salon"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-01 07:00:48+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177952747
(No visible changes after review)
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-05 03:52:45+00:00): Fixed incorrect and misleading amenity=* and healthcare=* tags for SEO spam POI and refined healthcare:specialty=* in changeset 183672657

https://osm.org/changeset/183672657
keepright! ler (2026-06-09 15:16:49+00:00): AB 66 doesn’t connect nearly enough larger settlements to be classified as highway=primary, therefore I have previously downgraded it to secondary and tertiary.

I dislike your change of reverting it back to primary, probably with the motivation of “official classifications” even though OSM road classes are generally supposed to represent traffic importance, which this road doesn’t have very much of.
MuzikMachine (2026-06-09 15:59:59+00:00): Referring to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Alberta where all highways numbered 1-216 have a minimum designation as Primary. Further to that, AB 66 does not connect to many population settlements; however it connects to many mountain recreational and tourist spots in Kananaskis.
keepright! ler (2026-06-10 10:23:18+00:00): New day, new prudence:

Apparently, recreational and tourist facilities are important enough to upgrade a road that should otherwise be secondary/tertiary to primary. I forgot one little detail from the wiki’s highway=primary definition: “Often connect larger towns.” – “often” doesn’t mean “always”, as AB 66 is an exception!

However, the sudden primary to tertiary transition in the southwest still bothers me a bit (and it is flagged by Osmose) – maybe downgrade the final quarter of AB 66 to secondary to ease the road class transition?
aceman444 (2026-02-02 23:36:53+00:00): Hi, please do not change shapes of buildings marked source=kapor2 as those are from the Slovak cadastre, unless you use the cadastre map and you see the building has changed. You do not qoute this source. Some building parts cannot be seen properly on Ortofotomozaika SR.

Also the swimming_pools do not need an area=yes tag. But they are all private so should have been tagged access=private and swimming_pool=personal. Without these tags, this is just a giant heap of public pools.
Peter Hanecak (2026-02-04 18:58:23+00:00): OK, I'll adjust. Thank you.
Peter Hanecak (2026-02-04 19:00:05+00:00): edit: Btw, should I then mark "kapor2" shapes as "demolished" and draw new ones?

As far as I've seen so far, that "kapor2" import is old, while ortofoto is sort of recent, or defitelly newer than the import, hence if kapor2 claims building not seen on ortofoto, I presume "demolished".
notmyproblem1 (2026-01-23 21:05:07+00:00): bbox was bigger than I thinked...
NeisBot (2026-01-24 07:37:34+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 91 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/24837492 v7 | 11 crossings
https://osm.org/way/24942323 v5 | 11 crossings
https://osm.org/way/24705189 v16 | 11 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/268521618 v5
https://osm.org/node/269848614 v7
https://osm.org/node/268521735 v7

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177626390
NeisRevert (2026-01-24 08:25:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/177637197
where the comment is: "🔄 Revert of unintended geometry change"
pwbriggs (2026-01-23 23:42:23+00:00): Awesome, thank you!

Feel free to reach out here or at https://slack.openstreetmap.us/ if you have any questions about OpenStreetMap, and welcome to the project!
Yog Sot (2026-01-24 13:39:54+00:00): jak są płoty, to je warto mapować

Nie zmieniaj natomiast granic ewidencyjncyh parku narodowego pls :)
poprawione
eggie (2026-01-23 23:03:35+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-01-23 23:07:15+00:00): Dag Dennie,
De info heb ik samengevoegd met de adresnode.

MVG
eggie
Dennie72 (2026-01-25 20:07:42+00:00): Dankjewel, ik zal informatie toevoegen als de praktijk binnenkort opent
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-23 22:21:28+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9212500351
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/888709308

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
VLD0251 (2026-01-23 22:23:01+00:00): Welcome to OSM and thanks for your first edits! i noticed you replaced the local name with English in the name tag. per OSM guidelines, name must remain in the local language. could you please explain this change or restore the original name? 
Thank you!
See: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177627373
bdentremont (2026-01-23 21:59:48+00:00): That was quick!  These edits look good; the streets and stop signs now look like what I saw on the ground.
silversurfer83 (2026-01-23 22:16:19+00:00): Hi :)

guckst du hier: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:start_date

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177628079
Frans S (2026-01-24 09:41:19+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped them. However, You overlooked the rectangular buildings.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177628612
NeisBot (2026-01-24 07:37:51+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 8 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1469910996 v1 | 4 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177628875
jcarlson (2026-02-02 15:09:11+00:00): do these power lines actually have real names? where is this information coming from?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177629038
Clover boy (2026-02-07 20:05:47+00:00): I follow a naming convention of naming power lines from substation to substation. I can see substation names on Open Infrastructure Map, which gets its data from Open Street Map. However, if these names appear to be wrong, you are welcome to change them.
Frans S (2026-01-24 09:38:58+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
Check the Mapbox imagery to get a clearer view. Align your mappings with the Bing Imagery.

Issues found on your mappings

A: Inaccurate mapping. 

D: Connecting nodes to other features.

E: Buildings not squared or rounded.



Explanation can be found in this document which  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards, and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177629344
SomeoneElse (2026-01-24 12:34:10+00:00): Hello,
I've nudged https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3236462244/history slightly south to make https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4280408#map=20/52.6479168/-9.3162372 a valid multipolygon again.
Best Regards,
Andy
George Sears (2026-01-24 21:21:28+00:00): Ciao solù,

Grazie per il tuo contributo a OpenStreetMap!

Ti diamo un caloroso benvenuto nella comunità di appassionati che da diversi anni integrano e migliorano la mappa e speriamo tu possa appassionarti e continuare a contribuire ancora a lungo.

Se invece il tuo è un contributo sporadico, non importa! Forse conosci qualcuno intorno a te a cui piace fare escursioni, andare in bicicletta o è semplicemente appassionata/o di mappe. Saremmo felici se tu le/gli parlassi di OpenStreetMap. 

Oltre a contribuire alla mappa, puoi aiutarci, ad esempio, caricando tracciati GPS, segnalando errori o promuovendo OpenStreetMap.

Se vuoi chiedere qualcosa, o semplicemente condividere la tua esperienza o idee per migliorare, saremo felici di incontrarti nel gruppo ufficiale 
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/it/60,
in quello Telegram
https://telegram.me/OpenStreetMapItalia
oppure  nella mailing list dei mappatori italiani, talk-it
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it. Per altri canali consulta la Wiki
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Contact.

Scopri maggiori informazioni sulla comunità italiana
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Italy.

Buona mappatura!
santamariense (2026-06-11 18:35:56+00:00): Luciano A Almeida,

Conforme acordado pela comunidade, se não for pavimentada, não pode ser primary, trunk, nem muito menos motorway.

Se o usuário final quiser diferenciar rodovias federais, estaduais e municipais, existem outras maneiras para se obter este dado.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brazil/Classifica%C3%A7%C3%A3o_das_rodovias_do_Brasil

Bons mapeamentos.
fortera_au (2026-01-24 06:40:04+00:00): Hi, are these actually signed with the words "Water Tank" on them? Even if so, I don't think adding that as a name is any value, it's not a unique or distinctive name.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177630722