piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
pitfire (2025-11-30 04:09:16+00:00): Hallo yukawa,

wir löschen keine Gebäude, die noch sehr lange auf diversen Luftbildern zu sehen sind.
Der Lebenszyklus-Namensraum kann verwendet werden, um den Status eines Objektes mit einem Präfix wie proposed, planned, construction, disused, abandoned, demolished, historic u.a. zu kennzeichnen.
Durch den Präfix kann sichergestellt werden, dass Objekte, die es noch nicht gibt oder die verfallen, geschlossen oder entfernt wurden, von Renderern und Anwendungen anders als existente Objekte behandelt werden.

VG pitfire
yukawa (2025-12-02 20:43:53+00:00): Hallo pitfire,
vielen Dank für den Hinweis. Ja, ich verstehe, da hatte ich nicht drüber nachgedacht. Hab wieder was dazu gelernt. Ich habe die Änderung jetzt Rückgängig gemacht und mit dem Lebenszyklus-Präfix den Abriss des Gebäudes eingetragen.
rasher (2025-11-24 10:10:42+00:00): There is an existing node for Seabrook (4359898974). I have merged the population tags to that node and removed this one.
user_5359 (2025-11-26 10:17:33+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/13325855724? Is this the correct meaning of <phone number>=wood?
solenoid jam (2025-11-27 12:05:50+00:00): Thanks for correcting the typo!
Drafer ® (2025-11-23 10:32:04+00:00): Proizvodnja i prodaja hleba, svežeg peciva i kolača
Comino (2025-11-23 11:20:31+00:00): Hi,

In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes".

Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag !
Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead.

For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Merchants#tagging-guidance
and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bitcoin

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Comino
https://btcmap.org/tagger/6794624
tastrax (2025-11-23 21:04:22+00:00): My edit was simply an update of state. Feel free to correct any bitcoin errors.
NeisBot (2025-11-23 10:18:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisBot (2025-11-23 10:18:43+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Event planning company in San Bernardino CA"
Stephen Males (2026-02-10 11:05:57+00:00): Hi, do you know if this shared path is complete? If not, construction might be better until surveyed. 
Btw, did you use Bing or ESRI imagery?
❤️‍🔥 (2026-02-10 13:23:22+00:00): Hi Stephen, it looked complete, but there was a temporary fence blocking access around https://osm.org/node/13325879916 

feel free to change it to construction, i won't be back any time soon to check
Drafer ® (2025-11-23 10:30:54+00:00): Trgovina na malo metalnom robom, bojama i staklom u specijalizovanim prodavnicama
eggie (2025-11-23 11:06:26+00:00): Dag Hetis...   Wanneer het bedrijf sluit zal het adres achterblijven. Daarom liever niet de hele adresnode verwijderen..
Adresnode nr 109 hersteld.
MVG
eggie
A67-A67 (2025-11-27 20:11:12+00:00): Hier gaat ook wat mis met telefoonnummers. Het netnummer van Den Bosch is 073, dus het telefoonummer is in de vorm +31 73 xxxxxxx. Bij de Wereldwinkel wordt deze bijvoorbeeld veranderd naar +31 736 894 068, met dus als netnummer 0736. Ik zal dit herstellen.
A67-A67 (2025-11-27 20:12:30+00:00): Daarnaast zie ik ook veel fouten met openingstijden, zoals Ma i.p.v. Mo en tijden als 26:00.
fndoder (2025-11-25 16:26:10+00:00): Нет, здание было указано правильно. Данный жилой комплекс состоит из стилобата (на крыше которого находится двор) и высотных корпусов. 

Таким образом, это единое здание. В плоском виде это на карте отображается не совсем понятно (но корректно), а в 3д верно. 3д можно посмотреть, в частности, на сайте https://demo.f4map.com/

Этот пакет правок я откатил, как ломающий 3д здание ЖК.
mueschel (2025-11-25 14:59:51+00:00): Hi,
what does "maxweightrating:total" mean? This tag isn't used in any other place.
taxi55 (2025-11-25 17:47:33+00:00): Hi mueschel,
sorry about, correction done.

For more information see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Key:Maxweight

Best regards
ScottWalkerAU (2025-11-24 00:46:37+00:00): Hi - what was the need to remove these driveways?
ScottWalkerAU (2025-11-24 01:08:06+00:00): This has been reverted in changeset 175047539
Drafer ® (2025-11-23 10:51:23+00:00): Savacoop - poljoprivredni proizvodi
fndoder (2025-11-25 16:31:23+00:00): В теге name в OSM указываются только имена собственные (за исключением строящихся объектов). Описания можно писать в теге description.

Высоты в метрах нужно заполнять только если они точно известны. В противном случае указывать лишь число этажей.

Для тегирования объектов энергетики есть отдельные теги, см. документацию - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:power%3Dtransformer

Для входов и въездов на парковку есть специальные теги:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:amenity%3Dparking_entrance

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:entrance
b-jazz (2026-02-25 00:43:39+00:00): This looks like an automated edit of some sort. I've seen several of these nodes now that have the website tag value be messed up and look like this: "/url?q=http://citycafeamarillo.com/&opi=79508299&..." instead of simply "http://citycafeamarillo.com/"

Please review your recent changes and fix all of these incorrect website tags. Thanks.
radiotrefoil (2025-11-23 13:17:32+00:00): As a Sydney resident, wanted to say welcome and thanks for your contributions, you're doing great work.
Please feel free to join the OpenStreetMap World discord server if you want, there is an active oceania channel with a few other sydneysiders here.
EneaSuper (2025-11-23 12:49:32+00:00): Ciao e grazie per tutte queste modifiche a Seui, in particolare a Per de Idda, rione che mi ha sempre dato delle gatte da pelare 😅❤️

Quindi hai fatto veramente un survey? Com'è stato?
BCNorwich (2025-11-24 07:35:10+00:00): Hi, unfortunately, you've added three highways on top of the original service highway. You also tagged the new highways as bridges. This duplication of highways could disrupt routing. I've removed the duplications and tweaked areas around the service roads.

Regards Bernard
Gowrie1927 (2025-11-25 08:21:37+00:00): Thanks Bernard, that looks much better.
OSM-Contributer (2025-11-23 12:02:02+00:00): I forgot to say but I also split a residential road and made some part of it service way and slipway
NeisBot (2025-11-23 12:21:39+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 7 potential crossings.

Problematic elements (top 3 by category):
https://osm.org/way/23320415 v33 | crossings=5

Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/559923866 v4

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=175023206
JezCrow (2025-11-24 11:15:38+00:00): Hi Anuj, welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Firstly thank you for updating the buildings and pitches at Langley Grammar School.

As the NeisBot has identified there were two accidentally dragged points (nodes) on Langley Road and Trelawney Avenue - which is surprisingly easy to do when panning the map. I have fixed these in changeset 175061176

Happy mapping!
Jez

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175061176
empty_child (2025-11-23 12:43:57+00:00): Hello
Please, don't remove ALL the building when you messed only with two tags. Thanks
empty_child (2025-11-23 12:46:16+00:00): Partially revert (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175024303)
mueschel (2025-11-25 10:53:46+00:00): Hi,
"psv_bypass" seems a bit strange. 'psv' also includes small vehicles, i.e. there would be a bypass for every vehicle.  There are already two 'hgv_bypass' in OSM which might be better suited.

Or you could add a generic vehicle-type subtag:
traffic_calming:bus = no
Hidoo00 (2025-11-25 12:33:14+00:00): Yeah I just went with ATYL, knowing full well it isn't ideal. Didn't have time to look into if there was any established way of tagging it. `hgv_bypass` is probably better, but it isn't a bypass (like a speed cushion would be), but more of a gentler slope for wide track width vehicles. Do you think `partial` is a good value for the bypass tag or is bypass the wrong choice of word altogether for something that doesn't actually bypass it?
mueschel (2025-11-27 08:58:46+00:00): I don't have a perfect solution either. Is the height different or only the slope? 

Maybe something with a conditional based on track width can help?

traffic_calming = cushion
traffic_calming:width = 1.5
traffic_calming:conditional = table @ (track_width > 1.5)
NeisBot (2025-11-23 13:22:51+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 23 potential crossings.

Problematic elements (top 3 by category):
https://osm.org/way/147260730 v10 | crossings=8
https://osm.org/way/399046552 v4 | crossings=15

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=175023643
gabro00 (2025-11-24 12:32:35+00:00): A szendvicses neve maradt, old:name vagy le is veheted ilyenkor.
CopperOppositeKindred (2025-11-25 17:16:28+00:00): javítva: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175120237
Fizzie-DWG (2025-12-03 06:58:56+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175432063
SomeoneElse (2025-11-23 12:43:50+00:00): I've not been in for years but news reports suggest it was still there in at least 2023.
Hugoren Martinako (2025-11-23 13:04:28+00:00): Creado el Cañón Rojo con sus acantilados, importada la Rambla de Barrachina y mejorados los caminos circundantes
NeisBot (2025-11-23 13:22:56+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 10 potential crossings.

Problematic elements (top 3 by category):
https://osm.org/way/1287045284 v4 | crossings=10

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=175024959
eggie (2025-11-23 13:54:52+00:00): Dag Finance,

Probeer de BAG data source en source:date te behouden.

MVG
eggie
empty_child (2025-11-23 19:22:42+00:00): Name tags shouldn't include the type of business unless it's an inseparable part of the naming. სილამაზის სტუდია - type of business, which was described by shop=beauty
Tewuzij (2025-11-23 13:32:46+00:00): Wrong changeset comment, should have been: Update my home province (150 changes)
eggie (2025-11-23 16:23:15+00:00): Welcome to OSM...

Your tag is cafe.. but maybe restaurant is better?

Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2025-11-23 19:00:41+00:00): Aangepast naar restaurant
Dadao34 (2025-11-23 19:03:14+00:00): Yes is a restaurant ! I just change find the way to change the tag
eggie (2025-11-23 19:04:49+00:00): Okay.. I already did.  :)
eggie (2025-11-23 19:05:42+00:00): On an computer typ CTRL-F5 to empty yout cache. Than you will see the difference.
Greetz,
eggie
amrmap (2025-11-30 20:49:05+00:00): Kan het zijn dat dit pad hetzelfde is als mijn track: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/amrmap/traces/12122937 ? Mijn track loopt (in westelijke richting) nagenoeg gelijk vanaf het klinkerpad en ik herinner me niet een eerdere afslag.
Kin Sapalot (2025-12-01 18:53:06+00:00): Ha, bedankt! 
Je note verklaart ook precies waarom we onverwacht op een "niet bestaand" pad parallel aan de oude tramlijn terecht kwamen. Enige wat ik zeker wist is dat het het fietspad recht over staken. Het traject heb ik aan de hand van AHN4 kaart ingetekend, maar daarin was die afslag niet heel duidelijk te zien. (Misschien zag ik een nog ouder pad in het relief).

Anyway, loop aangepast aan de hand van jouw trace. 
De note en rest laat ik aan jou over. Map-ze!
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2025-11-27 13:59:14+00:00): Merhaba. Avlulara eklediğiniz landuse=grass ile man_made=courtyard'ın birlikte kullanımı OSM'nin veri standartlarına uymuyor diye düşünüyorum. İkisi de "top-level"etiket.

Bkz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element

top-level etiketlerin ayrımı hakkında ayrıca şu konudaki tartışmaları okuyabilirsiniz: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/what-are-the-top-level-tags/125473

İyi günler.
user_23196460 (2025-11-28 06:38:02+00:00): Merhaba. Eski hâline getirdim. Avlunun içerisine ayrı bir yeşillik oluşturup onu landuse=grass ile etiketleyebilirdim, veya yeni bir alan eklemeden surface=grass kullanabilirdim ama wiki sayfasında şunu görünce vazgeçtim:

This tag (man_made=courtyard) was proposed in March 2015 but has never entered voting and so has not been accepted. However, as of May 2021, there were over 16,000 uses of this tag, with the iD editor offering this tag as a preset but more recently making it nonsearchable.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-11-23 13:51:03+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13326124999

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Metzor (2025-11-24 19:33:52+00:00): Heyhey cUbrA,

Danke für deine Verbesserung und Detailierung der Kartendaten :-)

Ich habe am highway das Straßenparken noch auf separat kartierte Parkfelder umgestellt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175081431#map=18/48.532226/9.290178&layers=N

Schöne Grüße
Metzor
cUbrA (2025-11-27 21:46:09+00:00): super, danke dir!
Strubbl (2025-11-23 15:09:50+00:00): Wow, das ging schnell. Vielen Dank!
Frans S (2025-12-01 14:59:21+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please do not copy incorrectly mapped buildings to other spots (they are so equally mismapped that I think you copied them). Map more accurately by following the rooflines precisely.
Square each rectangular building as well.
Quality prevails above quantity!!
And solve the issues flagged by the issue triangle.
Best regards
maro21 (2025-11-24 22:47:19+00:00): Jak można na zdjęciach lotniczych lub mapie adresowej zobaczyć ten sklep?
Bartek444 (2025-11-25 16:08:16+00:00): przez pomyłkę nie dodałem linku do zdjęcia z którego korzystałem: https://openaedmap.org/api/v1/photos/view/IoqMmutq5samjLXvPsoljg.webp
Bartek444 (2025-11-25 16:09:23+00:00): jest to zdjęcie dodane do AED obok lokalu: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12754232780
maro21 (2025-11-26 14:49:36+00:00): Ok, dzięki.
NeisBot (2025-11-23 14:24:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisBot (2025-11-23 14:24:43+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Heating and plumbing services on Vancouver Island"
Wanderer2000 (2025-11-24 17:50:14+00:00): Dag Taurus, ik heb je wijzigingen hier weer ongedaan gemaakt, dit is geen fietspad. Omdat de paaltje al gemapt zijn gaat het met routeren ook goed voor mbt motorvoertuigen.
SomeoneElse (2026-01-11 17:09:27+00:00): I'm guessing that this and the others at https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2iAx should be zebra not "zenra" :)
Adam Edwards (2026-01-14 11:58:05+00:00): Yes.  Typo.  I don't know how to find and correct this.  The link goes to some computer code which doesn't appear to do anything (which may be as I've never seen this before.)  Please change or give me a street location as there's lots of crossings in Leighton Buzzard.  Thanks.
SomeoneElse (2026-01-14 12:18:07+00:00): This one is https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/851522242#map=19/51.917125/-0.658083 .
The query is an Overpass Turbo one for all examples of that spelling - it is useful for finding spelling errors where only a few are found.
Adam Edwards (2026-01-14 15:57:11+00:00): Can I assume the spelling error has been corrected where made?
SomeoneElse (2026-01-14 23:04:18+00:00): They have now...
MassCartog (2025-11-24 03:19:38+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM. The features you removed in this changeset are valid. Please don’t remove valid OSM data.

You have a new account and might not be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground. If it exists on the ground, it is valid data regardless of a feature being public or private, designated or informal/illegal/unauthorized. Even decommissioned trails should not be removed until they no longer exist. Removing features that exist is actually considered vandalism.

It's clear that these features still exist on the ground. Not being public access areas is an invalid reason to remove data from OSM. So this edit is incorrect and damaging to valid OSM data.

The correct way to handle this is to use OSM's tagging system. access=private, or access=no would be appropriate if they are closed to the public. Once this is done, services that do use OSM data will reflect that and specify their access.

Please read this for more info:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won't_delete_roads_on_private_property

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F
Yunkers (2026-01-07 20:48:27+00:00): Hej,
Dlaczego do nazwy ulicy Sikorskiego dodałeś generała? Nie znalazłem przedrostka ani w terenie ani w oficjalnych źródłach (teryt).
TranslatorPS (2026-01-07 23:25:15+00:00): Przyznaję się w takim razie - jeśli dobrze pamiętam, zauważyłem rozbieżność pomiędzy ulicą a adresami na budynkach i poleciałem po linii najmniejszego oporu.
NeisBot (2025-11-23 15:24:39+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 49 potential crossings.

Problematic elements (top 3 by category):
https://osm.org/way/435011658 v1 | crossings=27
https://osm.org/way/435011611 v1 | crossings=22

Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/4329448770 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=175030562
ramthelinefeed (2025-11-24 09:15:26+00:00): Hi LateNightTone - great to get more accuracy in the Grand Central Station layout, but your edit seems to have broken the relations of a few bus routes (215, 216, ...) - the OSM Inspector validator is complaining (see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/ ) - could you check? I think maybe you just need to remove tagging on one of the ways you extended?
LateNightTone (2025-11-24 10:08:57+00:00): Ah, well spotted ramthelinefeed – thanks for pointing out. I'll fix it for now, although I suspect the routes around here will need a fairly full overhaul anyway (will pass on to the Translink user who may already be on it).
ramthelinefeed (2025-11-24 10:43:25+00:00): Yeah I have tagged half a dozen or more Ulsterbus routes that now operate from Grand Central Station - Translink's own app (which uses OSM mapping!) is a dog's dinner at that area, their routing algorithm is all over the place.  One tagging decision I made was to simply show all the busses using one 'bus stop', rather than to try and tag them on particular bus stands (as in my experience these change frequently, as drivers don't always pull up in the right stand anyways!)
LateNightTone (2025-11-24 11:13:59+00:00): Quite! Yes I've made tweaks here and there too after they mapped the bus stops, although mostly on the geometry side, consistency and so on. I might pop you a separate message.
Gerhard24 (2025-12-02 16:14:21+00:00): Falsche Anmerkung: "Changed: Steig A&B an neue Position versetzt". Steig A&B waren bereits am richtigen Ort und ich habe die Lage beibehalten.
esmenard (2025-11-26 22:39:29+00:00): Bonjour, avez vous utilisé comme source les images aériennes pour rectifier le cours de la Boële ? Si oui, elles ne sont pas à jour, les berges ont été renaturées fin 2024-début 2025 avec recréation de méandres, cf. https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4577909.
Nicolasb91 (2025-11-30 15:44:06+00:00): Bonjour,
Désolé pour mon erreur, je me suis basé sur l'image satellite en effet. Je ne réussi pas à remettre la nouvelle forme de la rivière. Je n'ai pas trouvé de plan sur le Siahvy.
esmenard (2025-11-30 18:12:37+00:00): J'ai annulé la modification https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175325181
Baloo Uriza (2025-11-24 14:13:54+00:00): Looks like this was added in the middle of a street.  What's the correct location?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175031192
ItsMaverick32 (2025-11-25 10:55:14+00:00): There over hanging a bit
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175031192
ItsMaverick32 (2025-11-25 10:55:38+00:00): There over hanging a bit
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175031192
dcskobuffs (2025-12-05 21:34:42+00:00): Hello SoyJosueVerde,

I noticed some highways were reclassified from tertiary and secondary to primary. These roads have maintained a long history of being secondary or tertiary, and do not appear to fit the definition of primary (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dprimary), as the nearby trunk (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/549856689) already serves as the major highway linking large towns in this area. Could you share your reasoning for reclassifying these roads to primary?

I also noticed ref=40 was added to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/904952547 and several surrounding highways. Since that nearby trunk already has that ref tagging along it, do you have any resources to support adding refs to these roads?

Thank you and looking forward to hearing from you.

Traducción automática:
Hola SoyJosueVerde,

He observado que algunas carreteras se han reclasificado de terciarias y secundarias a primarias. Estas carreteras tienen una larga historia de ser secundarias o terciarias y no parecen encajar en la definición de primaria (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dprimary), ya que la carretera troncal cercana (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/549856689) ya sirve como la carretera principal que conecta las grandes localidades de la zona. ¿Podrías explicarme el motivo de la reclasificación de estas carreteras como primarias?

También he observado que se ha añadido la referencia 40 a https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/904952547 y a varias carreteras circundantes. Dado que la carretera troncal cercana ya tiene esa referencia, ¿dispones de algún recurso para añadir referencias a estas carreteras?

Gracias y espero tu respuesta.
VA00 (2025-12-18 15:30:44+00:00): Chyba dodałeś duplikaty semaforów:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10247077832

Nawiasem mówiąc, na tym odcinku od wielu lat nie ma szyn.
VA00 (2025-12-18 15:33:45+00:00): I nie wiem czemu iD każe mi zmieniać operatora na operator=PKP Polskie Linie Kolejowe S.A.