piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
rohieb (2025-12-28 16:37:26+00:00): Was wolltest du mit access=no ausdrücken? Ist der Weg echt für alle Verkehrsarten (inkl. Fußverkehr) gesperrt? Oder ist es ein typischer Feldweg mit Schild "Gesperrt für Kfz" o.ä.?

Ich frage, weil Menschen in https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5094970 berichten, dass man bis zum Kanal hinablaufen kann, und auf dem aktuellen Niedersachsen-DOP20-Luftbild ist da inzwischen die Geometrie auch etwas anders.
rohieb (2025-12-28 16:38:14+00:00): Sorry, "mit access=no auf https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1317966726 ausdrücken" wäre eine präzisere Formulierung gewesen :)
SHuehne (2025-12-28 18:00:24+00:00): Wenn ich mich richtig erinnere - ist ja schon ein paar Tage her - war der Weg damals am Südende mit einer Kette abgesperrt. Daher mein Eindruck, daß man da generell nicht durch soll. Das widerspricht nicht unbedingt der Aussage, dass man zum Kanal gehen "kann" ;-) 
Wie es aktuell aussieht, weiß ich nicht.
rohieb (2025-12-30 05:42:41+00:00): OK, das klingt nachvollziehbar. Danke!
DanielAgos (2024-11-09 17:36:55+00:00): Olá! Das imagens aéreas mais recentes e imagens ao nivel de rua (mapillary) vi que as vias que vem do IP8 e IC1 encontram-se separadas até à portagem, permitindo depois desta a mudança de via para ambos os sentidos da A2. Vi situação semelhante no outro lado: via comum até à portagem, depois desta vias separadas para A26 e IC1/EN259.

Deste changeset, vi que a configuração está um pouco diferente das imagens, Foi assim observado no terreno?
jetterrr (2024-11-11 16:23:41+00:00): Olá! No sentido norte-sul, as vias separam-se a cerca de 100m da portagem (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=38.120686630751&lng=-8.4147107395756&z=17&pKey=1833179960521998&focus=photo&x=0.48023862401030526&y=0.553847340394319&zoom=0.8073795154225577).  A escolha do pórtico vai definir o trajeto, já que, a seguir à portagem, não é possível alterar o destino. Foi verificado no terreno, tendo levado, até, a um erro na navegação que me forçou a entrar no IC1 em vez do IP8.

No sentido oposto as vias (de S e E) surgem separadas na portagem, juntando-se um pouco mais à frente.
DanielAgos (2024-11-11 16:31:46+00:00): Agradeço a resposta. Quando vi as vias no OSM apresentava uma configuração antiga que como indica, tinha as vias juntas na portagem que era diferente das imagens satélites mais recentes. Ao corrigir encontrei este changeset que sugeria que essa correção tinha sido feita mas não consegui encontrar as alterações no mapa. Entretanto já corrigi para a situação atual e tal como descreve
Filohipo (2024-11-12 14:04:29+00:00): Boa tarde. Ia comentar esta edição com base nas minhas fotos mapillary.
Já vi que estão a ser usadas para clarificar as vias, de notar que são 360º
Boas edições ;-)
Sam Merritt (2024-09-24 20:49:40+00:00): I was mistaken in saying Pecos CAD, i meant Jeff Davis.
Jrachi (2024-10-13 07:38:42+00:00): Ciao.
Mentre aggiungevi building hai interrotto e variato la relazione del percorso escursionistico a catasto nazionale 709.
Ho rimesso a posto io, fai attenzione la prossima volta!
Ivo
that_dude (2024-10-13 09:37:00+00:00): Ciao.
Su iD e Rapid non si può modificare l'ordine delle relazioni e in ogni caso non tolgo o aggiungo mai pezzi alle strade unite da una relazione proprio per evitare questi inconvenienti non risolvibili da tali editor.
Tuttavia, questi editor hanno dei bug per cui, quando una way viene divisa (ad esempio perché ha una superficie diversa e vorrei mappare tale informazione), in condizioni che non mi sono del tutto chiare i membri della relazione vengono rimescolati. Questo problema non è nemmeno visibile dall'interfaccia grafica.
Purtroppo non basta tutta l'attenzione del mondo per evitare il problema, andrebbe risolto nel codice di iD/Rapid ma non ho le competenze per farlo e non mi è chiaro quando si verifica esattamente per segnalarlo, al di là del fatto che mi sembra che sia già stato segnalato allo sviluppatore di iD ma non so se sia mai stato risolto.
Jrachi (2024-10-13 12:21:14+00:00): Immaginavo fosse un problema generato da iD.
Sopratutto il non poter vedere l'ordine dei membri causa non pochi mal di testa.
Ti ringrazio della risposta.
Personalmente uso iD molto raramente e solo per modifiche sui tag.
Ivo
woodpeck_repair (2024-11-13 21:05:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159107632 where the changeset comment is: revert un-trustworthy/fictional golf mapping
Sam Merritt (2024-09-24 20:49:11+00:00): I was mistaken in saying Pecos CAD, i meant Jeff Davis.
Sam Merritt (2024-09-24 20:48:29+00:00): i was mistaken in typing Pecos CAD, i meant Jeff Davis CAD
CurlingMan13 (2024-09-25 19:20:59+00:00): Also, driveways should be connected to the roadways and mapped as a driveway, not cartpaths

Buildings should be squared to the sides are parallel/perpendicular with 90deg corners
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157055841
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-12-18 15:10:12+00:00): jakie jest źródło tych nazw?
czy np. niemiecka lub polska nazwa dla https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12197771607 jest w użyciu?

czy to jest kopiowane z jakichś starych map?

what is the source for this names?
is for example Polish (or German) name for https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12197771607 in any active use?

have you copied it from some old maps?
Fasha4 (2024-12-18 16:18:11+00:00): Źródłem tych nazw (polskich również) jest m.in. niemiecka wikipedia:
https://de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opole
Źródłem dla lokalizacji są stare mapy:
https://maps.arcanum.com/de/map/europe-19century-secondsurvey/?bbox=1996076.781966366%2C6559154.452184833%2C1998423.3909330687%2C6562742.713468867&layers=here-aerial%2C158%2C164
Przykład użycia nazwy "Przeskok": https://nowawieskrolewska.pl/historia/
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-12-19 03:02:16+00:00): Czyli te nazwy nie są w aktualnym użyciu a przynajmniej nie było to sprawdzone?

Do Wikipedii jeszcze sprawy licencyjne dochodzą ale to inna para kaloszy
donovaly (2025-04-27 16:03:30+00:00): Many thanks! I would like to add IBNR numbers to other stations in the Balcans (Kosovo, North Macedonia etc.) What database did you use to get the IBNR numbers? I see you referenced "DB API". Do you have a link for me to that API?
jbruechert (2025-04-27 16:25:08+00:00): Hi!
I needed the ibnr to match stations from the Deutsche Bahn Hafas API to OSM. I found out the ibnrs by querying their API with a small script, but the API has gone defunct since.
You can however use the ÖBB endpoint instead with my fork of pyhafas (https://github.com/jbruechert/pyhafas/commits/zpcg-scraper/).

The script is then really simple:
```
from pyhafas import HafasClient
from pyhafas.profile import OEBBProfile
import sys

client = HafasClient(OEBBProfile())

locations = client.locations(sys.argv[1])
print([(s.name, s.id) for s in locations])
```
donovaly (2025-06-16 22:39:17+00:00): Danke dir. Das mit den ÖBB habe ich bisher genommen. Nur verstehe ich nicht, warum ein Bahnhof wie Skopje dort nicht drin ist. Überhaupt finde ich keine IBNRs für Nordmazedonien.
jbruechert (2025-06-25 17:09:58+00:00): Meines Wissens nach existieren IBNRs nur für Bahnhöfe die in UIC Merits enthalten sind. Vermutlich liefert die Bahn in Nordmatzedonien keine Fahrplandaten an UIC Merits.
mga_geo (2024-09-27 05:24:21+00:00): Bonjour,
Il ne faut pas inclure de ways dans les relations route_master.
J'ai corrigé.
Marc
noznoz (2024-09-29 16:55:25+00:00): Ah ! flute, effectivement j'ai un peu eu peur en touchant à ça, c'est l'élément de compréhension qu'il me manquait. Merci :)
mga_geo (2024-11-24 05:39:26+00:00): Bonjour,
Pour la ligne 13 de Satin-Jacques vers Chantepie, le carrefour avenue des Pays Bas/boulevard de Bulgarie est en erreur en raison d'un sens unique.
Avez-vous la possibilité de vérifier sur place ?
Marc
l'erreur est signalée sur https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/FR/BRE/FR-BRE-Star-Analysis.html
noznoz (2024-11-24 14:42:28+00:00): Ça devrait être réparé :) la zone est encore vouée aux modifications dans les mois à venir
mga_geo (2024-11-25 05:24:34+00:00): Nickel, PTNA ne détecte plus d'erreurs!
Geo-Tobi (2024-09-29 08:36:37+00:00): Hier wurde surface asphalt gesetzt, aber tracktype auf grade2 belassen. Absicht?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/94804959
petr1chor (2024-09-29 10:59:03+00:00): Danke, der Eintrag war noch vom alten highway=track übrig. Ich habe es angepasst.
VisibleSouth (2024-09-26 21:10:39+00:00): Please do not delete the names of the farms. Yes, they are family names, but they are also important landmarks here locally. Sure, in Colorado a farm is more likely to be called “Blue Mountain Ranch” ;-) but in northern Namibia we are happy when there are entries in OSM that reflect the local conditions. Thank you!
VLD192 (2024-09-26 21:56:13+00:00): Hello angolasandy.
Thanks for reaching out regarding my updates to the farm name. I was not aware of the naming conventions in the area and will keep this in mind when editing in the future. Thanks again and feel free to reach out if you have any questions.  Casey
VisibleSouth (2024-09-27 15:28:51+00:00): Thank you for your quick and attentive reply!
NorthCrab_upload (2024-09-24 21:11:00+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12197796278

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Famlam (2024-09-25 15:27:56+00:00): Hi Jasper, vermoedelijk kunnen de adressen ook weg, of zag je dat bijv. de brievenbussen nog bestonden?
jxpsert (2024-09-25 15:32:41+00:00): Niet overwogen bij de edit, maar inderdaad, de brievenbussen staan er nog.
KiloThree (2024-09-25 01:37:28+00:00): Did you also update the tags on the crossing ways? I know the construction here is more recent than the imagery, is the markings here accurate or would you happen to know them?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157057372
Michael N (2024-09-25 01:46:35+00:00): yes, I had just updated all the crossing ways and a lot of the rest of the intersection in its current construction state, changeset 157057043. This follow-up changeset was just to the crossing nodes. I checked all of them. Most are marked (the ones I didn't delete entirely) but one of them is now unmarked because it's was paved over and not repainted since. (and I made it explicitly unmarked.).

That said feel free to review the tags I used on the crossings. I did my best from the wiki by using crossing:markings and crossing:signals.
KiloThree (2024-09-25 01:56:14+00:00): Oh, more than "crossing:markings=yes", I would mark these and the ways as "crossing:markings=zebra" to indicate the logitudinal bars

I don't believe `crossing:signals` is a standard yet, I'd keep `crossing=traffic_signals` as well. I generally aim to do that along with `crossing:markings` to be explicit about whether and how it's marked
Michael N (2024-09-25 16:06:06+00:00): OK, I added crossing=traffic_signals to the ways (changeset 157090817). I don't really understand what the difference is supposed to be between tags on the crossing nodes and tags on the crossing ways.
KiloThree (2024-09-25 16:21:32+00:00): I also don't have a lot of strong distinction between them. I've seen a lot of places where both are tagged with most of the data, this populates data for the way, and so could be represented in the pedestrian network, as well as for the node, which can be represented in the auto network, which is why I suspect both get populated so much. The tags there's more consideration around are kerb and tactile paving tags, which can be ambigurous (e.g. barrier=kerb on a way would indicate there is a kerb along that whole way) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing#Accessibility
seattlefyi (2024-09-28 05:31:13+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM! Thanks for the building and address edit, though should say that the building outline should follow the footprint of the building, not the property parcel. Could you please adjust it? I added some neighboring buildings as examples -- and there are more untraced around, too. Thanks again!
wrongwei (2024-09-28 14:54:34+00:00): I changed the outline, but it’s still not updated. How long does it normally take?
seattlefyi (2024-09-28 19:31:16+00:00): It may depend on the servers' load, but have seen it update quickly (~15 minutes), sometimes longer. The tiles may also be cached by your browser, so try force-refreshing those (easier on a laptop browser).
seattlefyi (2024-09-28 19:34:00+00:00): Also, I refreshed my cache, so am already able to see the changes -- thanks for updating it! The tags all look good, only further suggestion I'd make is after building is drawn and tagged, press 'q' (or right-click and select the squaring tool) to make the corners 90 degrees, which is usually correct and looks better. Hope to see more edits! If you have questions in the future, feel free to message through the OSM website.
CurlingMan13 (2024-09-25 22:21:55+00:00): Please review:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property#:~:text=See%20also-,Why%20deleting%20paths%20is%20not%20the%20solution,-In%20OSM%2C%20we

This changeset has been reverted.  Access tags should be used instead.  AllTrails will respect the access tags.  Be aware, people will go on routes based solely on aerial imagery, which we do not control.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157103782
felipeeugenio (2024-09-24 23:12:16+00:00): Hola Camilo. Porfa cuando cambies el nombre de una calle, cambia también las direcciones de las interpolaciones.
gracias
Camilo Nuñez Castro (2024-09-24 23:41:07+00:00): Hola, conforme se me pasan. 😞
Amore Shisha Lounge (2024-09-24 23:04:14+00:00): Amore Shisha Lounge gururla sunar.
czubi (2024-10-01 16:47:32+00:00): Hallo Juliane, willkommen bei OSM.
"Brunnenkresseklinge" ist kein Eigenname, name=* ist nur für Eigennamen. Ich habs wieder rausgenommen. Was ist denn der richtige name der Fa? "Erfurter Brunnenkresse" oder "Brunnenkresse für Erfurt" dann würde ich das mal vereinheitlichen zwischen den beiden Klinegn. Die beiden rechten gehören nicht zur Fa?
czubi (2024-10-01 16:52:00+00:00): ok, hab nachgelesen und mich an den TV-Bericht erinnert. Ihr habt eine Klinge übernommen und Euere Fa. heißen verschieden. Gibts einen Shop? Dann würde ich den noch ergänzen.
pantufla (2024-10-17 20:40:01+00:00): Hola, 

hay algunos errores en el parque, si no te importa los voy a corregir. Ese es su nombre? Quién es ana dictadora reyes?
rayth (2024-09-26 12:02:55+00:00): Cuma nak tegur kat bahagian taman Central Park. Tag name=* jangan letak sekali dengan nama tempat ya.

Baca https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
Filip009 (2024-09-26 12:25:57+00:00): Nemalo by to byť skorej toto https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking_entrance?
ticho2 (2024-09-26 18:09:50+00:00): Mas pravdu, lepsie som si nastudoval prislusne tagy a vidim ze som ich mal zle pochopene.

Opravil som tento aj vedlajsi garazovy vjazd.
Filip009 (2024-09-26 19:26:55+00:00): Super :)
CurlingMan13 (2024-09-25 22:45:15+00:00): do not partially overlap land covers.
envagyokabela (2024-09-25 00:12:32+00:00): landuse igazítása*
jhaluska80 (2024-09-27 18:35:52+00:00): Just a heads up.   It's not considered a good practice to attach landuse to roads.  The roads should be consider the centerline and not the edge.

If you see it elsewhere on the map (and you will) it's a minor mistake.

It seems like a small things but it makes the map more accurate and maintenance easier.

You can attach landuse to other landuse if it's not separated by a road/river.
CurlingMan13 (2025-01-01 02:28:20+00:00): What jhaluska80 said.  It's very frowned upon to snap/connect landuse/landcover to roads.  makes it a PITA to update.
pitfire (2024-10-13 05:35:44+00:00): Hi ASRvwde,

die Änderung auf 70 verträgt sich aber nicht mit "maxspeed:type=DE:rural".
Das währe dann jetzt:
maxspeed=70
traffic_sign=DE:274[70]

VG pitfire
DP24PH (2024-10-03 03:40:31+00:00): ALERT: Several survey sources on the ground says otherwise since the overpass is now on construction, and parts of PH-410/Tagaytay-Nasugbu Highway got converted to divided highway as a result.


DP24
NeisBot (2024-09-25 01:12:38+00:00): Hi LOHS Dragons, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
No primary map features!?

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=157060765
LOHS Dragons (2024-09-25 12:42:55+00:00): Hello NeisBot!
I am the trail coordinator for the trail in question.  The old trail information is causing us issues when using strava.  I am working to clean up the system.  I have a new path to upload which is the new official trail and the one that we are maintaining.  Is there a tutorial on uploading a new path?  

Thanks for your help!
SomeoneElse (2024-09-27 16:06:43+00:00): Hi LOHS Dragons,

If a trail is no longer in use, I'd suggest changing the tag on each section from "highway=path" to something like "disused:highway=path" is better than deleting it.  The reason for that is that if someone sees nothing at all there when editing OSM, they might just add it back, especially if looking at old aerial imagery from before the time when the trail was disused.
You can also ask people at https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/us/78 about it.
Best Regards,
Andy
felipeeugenio (2024-09-25 13:54:55+00:00): Hola. Intenté interpretar lo que trató de hacer, que contenía varios errores, por favor darle una mirada para ver si los nombres quedaron bien. Revisé contra los mapas del SII.

Saludos
user_11609320 (2024-09-25 02:08:26+00:00): this stop was eliminated when omnitrans imploded and had to be bailed out by sbcta
nevw (2024-09-25 08:14:03+00:00): Hi ShaunKolo, incorrect gate tags were added here
See our wiki for the gate tags…
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ms:Tag:barrier%3Dgate
nevw (2024-09-25 08:18:25+00:00): …err, english version 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dgate
nevw (2024-10-04 11:01:38+00:00): no response, edited tags
fortera_au (2024-09-25 11:29:07+00:00): Hey and welcome to OSM! I'd recommend pressing Q in iD to square off buildings.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157061660
fortera_au (2024-09-27 01:48:30+00:00): Thanks for squaring that one off!
Stalker61 (2024-09-25 13:50:43+00:00): Доброго дня. Не надоело еще статусы дорог пилить по своему вкусу?
user_14840936 (2024-09-26 05:19:33+00:00): Ежели у вас иной вкус на дороги, пилите взад, Я не против. Опосля я докажу вам, что автодоргу Салехард - Лабытнанги следует по всем правилам ОСМ относить к первостепенным, если не к основным.
NeisBot (2024-09-25 02:40:38+00:00): Hi ShaunKolo, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 96% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 15 highway(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=157061785
Memmoth Cafe&Hostel In Lampang (2024-11-28 14:31:47+00:00): We strongly accept BTC lightning, please call the manager if any staff not accepted.
Thank you to fix the money fix the world.
Memmoth Cafe&Hostel In Lampang (2024-11-28 14:36:23+00:00): Today (28th Nov,2024), we got the customer would like to pay BTC lightning for a cup of coffee but the new staff not accepted.
Apologize for that and we already train and provide them the information.
We are looking forward to see you again.
Memmoth Cafe&Hostel In Lampang (2024-11-28 14:39:07+00:00): We accept BTC lightning for all services such as coffee shop, hostel (dormitory and private), drive tour, meeting room and scooter/bicycle for rent.
Fizzie-DWG (2024-10-11 01:22:50+00:00): Reverted by DWG - spam

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157737626
NeisBot (2024-09-25 03:16:38+00:00): Hi ShaunKolo, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 114 highway(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=157062181
Kovoschiz (2024-09-25 07:09:54+00:00): Please don't simply delete it. It's a more complicated task that needs to be reworked with `building:parts=` from the old method.
HellMap (2024-09-25 09:07:03+00:00): Please do not delete and redraw buildings (or other tagged elements), but change the existing building as mentioned before in [1]. Firstly, this loses contribution history of the original element. And secondly, you didn't actually copy the original tags [2] to the new building, thus deleting the address. (In this case, an address bot would eventually restore the address data, so it isn't a permanent problem.)

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156956846

[2] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/182426427/history
HellMap (2024-09-25 09:01:43+00:00): This changeset contains no changes to any elements, I think you uploaded it by accident or didn't upload your changes.
ivanbranco (2025-07-18 12:21:58+00:00): Hi, why this tree has a leisure=nature_reserve tag? It seems to be a single Quercus robur tree. Also nature reserve should be mapped as areas.

Thanks and good mapping
Approksimator (2025-07-18 14:08:07+00:00): Fixed!

Thanks and good mapping
HellMap (2024-09-25 08:59:29+00:00): Are you sure this sidewalk extends further? Was there some new construction here? It stopped shortly after the intersection only a month ago.
felipeeugenio (2024-09-25 13:41:14+00:00): Hello.
Thanks for your editions, I corrected some of the buildings you drew yesterday due to some misunderstandings in the way we approached the building in OSM.

We draw the base of each structure. We do not group structures into schematic polygons over each building. 

A lot of the ones you draw are just approximated polygons over where a building is located, but it is clear in the picture that there are several buildings that can be drawn separately and with more detail.

Besides, some of them can be seen over roads and some of them touch each other in single nodes, which is clearly not true.

We appreciate your time and your willingness to help and our intention here is to help, but a more detailed effort is needed here. Sadly, there are a lot of examples of this not made by you which probably led you into thinking that this is the way.

in Chile, you can go to San Fernando, which is a very detailed city. Or every single city in Europe is good enough to provide you with a visual example of what I am talking about.

Tip: you can “square” a building using the Q key. The ones you are drawing are clearly hand-made.

regards
NorthCrab_upload (2024-09-25 04:50:57+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/367982508

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
nevw (2024-09-25 05:18:33+00:00): Hi, when mapping Drummond Street you have overlapped a section of the highway. Are you able to delete the overlapping part thanks. It should join the highway at only one node.
nevw (2024-09-25 08:02:15+00:00): Thanks, looks good.