piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mrpulley (2024-06-14 12:31:45+00:00): Oxley Highway and Carrington Street are both maxspeed 80 (not 100). Corrected at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145789477 (also rechecked by myself in May 2024)
clay_c (2023-03-07 03:27:41+00:00): Actually added operator:wikidata=Q125943. Disregard changeset comment
Geo-Tobi (2024-10-03 06:47:58+00:00): Warum wurde hier alles auf private gesetzt? Steht hier explizit "Privatweg, Durchfahrt verboten"?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1152318664
Hans Loderer (2024-10-03 08:00:02+00:00): Dieses 'private' kommen nicht wirklich von mir, dieses Stück Weg war früher ein Teil eines anderen Weges, und ist durch eine Wegteilung (durch mich) entstanden. Für den neuen Weg Radweg nach Puchschlagen, hab ich das private 'explizit' entfernt. Vermutlich ist kann es an diesem Weg auch weg (zumindest für Fußgänger und Radfahrer)
Gruß Hans
Hufkratzer (2023-03-07 22:53:17+00:00): Hi,
You have tagged 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1152319278
leisure=horse_riding (riding centre), but it is obviously just an outdoor riding arena, which should be tagged leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian according to the wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dhorse_riding

Similar problem here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/779878030

A reverse case where you have tagged an equestrian centre leisure=pitch when leisure=horse_riding would be appropriate here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/671515497
Ewen Hill (2023-03-08 08:24:30+00:00): Hi, thank you for your input and details and I have fixed all three although I am not 100% sure about the last
Hufkratzer (2023-03-08 11:54:07+00:00): Looks good, thanks
kanyakumari007 (2023-03-07 07:26:45+00:00): Thanks for the update
kanyakumari007 (2023-03-07 07:27:34+00:00): Thanks for adding the place
jcr83 (2023-07-03 13:47:41+00:00): Bonjour,
Vous avez ajouté le sommet Hundskopf alors qu'il était déjà présent dans OSM à environ 400 m vers l'est-sud-est, à un emplacement conforme à ce qu'indique la carte IGN. Pouvez-vous vérifier SVP ?
BaboucheVerte (2023-07-05 07:43:02+00:00): Bonjour, et merci pour la vigilance ! Objet supprimé https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138135654. Le doublon avait été créé précédemment, et quand j'ai fait la conflation pour ajouter les ref:refuges.info=*, je ne m'en étais pas rendu compte. Merci !
bad_mapper (2023-03-07 09:39:45+00:00): Добрый день!
Ну как это не совпадают, если совпадают!? Как-то совсем непрофессионально удалять official_name с одного куска дороги и оставлять на других участках. 
Я поправлю.
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2023-03-30 11:21:04+00:00): يا أستاذ رعد ، هذه الخريطة عامة نرجوا منكم عدم وضع أماكنك الخاصة فيها
wille (2023-03-14 21:08:59+00:00): Edição revertida. Mesmo nome fantasioso utilizado em Salvador e que não consta na camada do IBGE e nenhum registro na internet: https://duckduckgo.com/?q=%22Rua+Cl%C3%A1udio+Fontenelle%22&t=ffab&atb=v283-1&ia=web
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133388584
wille (2023-03-14 21:07:56+00:00): Edição revertida. Nome fantasioso diverge dos dados do IBGE e não consta registros na internet: https://duckduckgo.com/?q=%22Rua+F%C3%A1bio+Leal+Borges%22&t=ffab&atb=v283-1&ia=web
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133388614
zluuzki (2023-03-10 15:39:45+00:00): Where was it discussed to add those pointless wikidata duplications and replace "CSX" with a longer variant (and all other edits within this massive automated edit series)?
clay_c (2023-03-10 15:53:01+00:00): Nowhere.

Tracks all over the country have been tagged over the years with various names for the same operator (e.g. "CSX", "CSXT", "CSX Transportation"). I went through and made sure all tracks operated by the same company have the same operator value, and added operator:wikidata to mitigate this sort of data degradation in the future. The "longer variant" here is the name of the company without abbreviations, according to OSM conventions.
zluuzki (2023-03-10 15:59:37+00:00): How exactly is "operator:wikidata" helping to "mitigate this sort of data degradation in the future"? 

It especially degrades the data when people forget to update both tags and they conflict with each other.
clay_c (2023-03-10 16:23:31+00:00): If someone forgets to update both tags and they conflict with each other, please talk to them and try to figure out what they were attempting to do, and help them finish the job. I've added an issue on the Name Suggestion Index repository to hopefully make it less complicated to keep these tags out of conflict. https://github.com/osmlab/name-suggestion-index/issues/7857

Plus, data consumers can deduce much more information from `operator:wikidata` than from `operator`. If, for example, I want a renderer that displays the reporting marks of railroads, I can determine that by checking the statements in the Wikidata item attached to it.
zluuzki (2023-03-10 18:16:08+00:00): "Plus, data consumers can deduce much more information from `operator:wikidata` than from `operator`. If, for example, I want a renderer that displays the reporting marks of railroads, I can determine that by checking the statements in the Wikidata item attached to it."

Sorry, but all of those "good reasons" I've heard so far sound like maximum effort for minimal benefit. If I wanted to have something like that within my map/tool, I would write a one-time wikidata query which extracts a table with operators and their reporting marks, and use this to match the normal "operator=*" values.
Something like https://w.wiki/6Rg8
... I wrote this using Chatgpt, all I had to to was to replace the properties with the correct ones - took less than 5 minutes. Another 5 minutes, and it would probably also include all aliases.

Don't get me wrong: I, too, feel it is very important that these "operator" tags are consistent. "CSX Transportation" has been used almost not at all so far, but ok.
But I'm pretty sure that these Wikidata tags -especially on train tracks- cause much more maintaining effort than they would really ever help anyone.
Luzandro (2023-04-14 04:46:58+00:00): Hallo,

ich habe die Sperren der Bahnübergänge hier und in CS 133389053 rückgängig gemacht, da diese laut deinem CS-Kommentar nur am 07.+08. März gegolten haben. Wie dir auch schon von anderen mitgeteilt wurde, sollten solche kurzen Sperren nicht unbefristet eingetragen werden. Wenn du diese am 07. März einträgst, wird kaum ein Navi diese Beschränkung rechtzeitig berücksichtigen, dafür war es jetzt bis auf weiteres für alle gesperrt. Alternativ kann man für so kurze Sperren bedingte Beschränkungen verwenden, wenn der Zeitraum bekannt ist. Selbiges gilt auch für temporäre Geschwindigkeitsbeschränkungen.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3641561

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Temporäres

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Conditional_restrictions

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/26612482/history
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133389081
user_5359 (2023-03-12 20:27:15+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1152334971. what is the meaning of the foreign keys?
Adam Schneider (2023-03-12 20:34:59+00:00): Oops! I started from raw NHD data for that one, and I forgot to remove all the extra data fields.  I just cleaned it up.
PengualaHeadphones (2023-07-04 11:34:45+00:00): The previous edit was showing as Ambuklao (transmission tower).
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2023-03-16 05:07:51+00:00): Fully reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133397258
Glassman (2023-03-09 17:43:34+00:00): #TIP: square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133389934
skyper (2023-03-07 14:02:31+00:00): Hi Postman Lee,
danke für Deine Verbesserungen.
Ich glaube ich habe mich falsch ausgedrückt. Das `razed:building` ersetzt das`building`. Dadurch wird das Gebäude nicht mehr dargestellt, bleibt aber erst mal in den Daten. Habe es bereits korrigiert.

Viele Grüße,
skyper
canfe (2023-03-07 16:46:06+00:00): They look more like a footpath to me than a footway
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133390070
Đuro Jiří (2023-03-07 07:26:23+00:00): Scusa, perché hai cancellato indirizzo? Secondo sito ufficiale SME si trova sulla Via Musile, numero civico 20.
fabiotofy (2023-03-10 06:53:28+00:00): il civico era doppio, vi è già presente un altra risorsa che rappresenta il dato. Vedasi: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10715894130
Glassman (2023-03-09 17:45:31+00:00): I'm guessing this is actually a detention pond. They are tagged as landuse=basin + basin=detention.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133390123
wolfbert (2023-06-13 07:15:48+00:00): Die Hausnummer 6 existiert schon am Hauptgebäude.
flohoff (2023-03-07 07:53:50+00:00): Moin,
bist du dir mit den 2m da sicher? Das würde bedeuten das ein Golf da mit den Aussenspiegeln nicht durch passt.

Und von LKW/Bussen und co sprechen wir nicht - die sind 2.5m 

Flo
Galbinus (2023-03-07 14:50:51+00:00): Anhand des im iD-Editor hinterlegten Luftbilds "NRW-Orthophoto" und dem eingeblendeten Maßstab würde ich die Durchfahrt an der Engstelle auf ca. 3,5m schätzen.
Galbinus (2023-03-07 15:51:58+00:00): Mein voriger Kommentar bezieht sich auf die nördliche Fahrbahnverengung. Die südliche besteht aus einer Mittelinsel und einer Seitenbegrenzung. Die Fahrbahnen schätze ich Anhand des im vorigen Kommentar genannten Luftbild auf jeweils 2,3m Breite.
Tiliae (2023-03-07 22:21:14+00:00): Jupp, kommt hin.

https://imgur.com/a/SFlep1L
Kaerbr (2023-03-08 06:42:12+00:00): War gerade nochmal vor Ort und habe mit https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=de.westnordost.streetmeasure genau 4m gemessen.

Hatte fälschlicherweise einfach 2m eingetragen, da dort dieses Schild steht: shorturl.at/svR12
flohoff (2023-03-08 10:26:30+00:00): 
Das schild gilt dann ja aber nicht nur für den "choker" sondern vermutlich für die ganze Brücke?

Ich würde im übrigen sowas immer in "Prosa" als note auf dem weg hinterlassen - Sonst kann das keiner Nachvollziehen.

Ach ja - Und mapillary Bilder sind auch immer super weil man die einfach mal als Link verschicken kann.

D.h. aber das die physical width schon ggfs mehr ist aber die Straße für Fahrzeuge über 2m gesperrt ist.

Was ja auch okay ist.

Flo
flohoff (2023-03-08 10:42:12+00:00): Ach ja - Das war sogar mal 1.8m Gesperrt:

https://www.google.de/maps/@51.9963269,8.6115939,3a,72.8y,41.63h,83.46t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s4hW2Ob9N8s6QJglktklNiQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656
Galbinus (2023-03-08 13:56:47+00:00): Eine durch Verkehrszeichen festgelegte Maximalbreite sollte man nicht als Breite für die Fahrbahnverengung eintragen sondern für den gesamten Straßenabschnitt als Attribut der Straßenlinie: 
maxwidth=2 
traffic_sign=DE:264[2]
(vgl. http://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/?signs=264%5B2%5D )
Leo Slager (2023-03-07 23:39:11+00:00): Dag Andre,
De routerelatie van de bussen ziet er wat anders uit als de wandel en fietsroutes:
De role in de relatie wordt nooit ingevuld. De route gaat immers altijd in 1 richting.
Ik zal de fouten repareren.
Supaplex (2023-03-07 12:08:12+00:00): Hi,

The phone format is wrong. The country code for Taiwan is +886
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133390968
CurlingMan13 (2024-01-18 03:15:00+00:00): Verify it even exists.  A number of other features mapped by the user are questionable.
Supaplex (2024-01-18 03:49:19+00:00): The one is correct by search online resource like homepage
kanyakumari007 (2023-03-07 07:28:03+00:00): Successfully added the temple
CurlingMan13 (2024-01-18 03:13:05+00:00): No BTC atm here...
angys (2023-03-07 10:18:15+00:00): Should be BPP
tudor_rotariu (2023-03-08 08:21:08+00:00): Hello! Thank you for the feedback. I updated the name to Jalan BPP 6/1.
angys (2023-03-08 14:15:09+00:00): also the surrounidngs need to use uppercase
limes11 (2023-03-08 14:49:04+00:00): Hi, 

danke für den Eintrag, das ergibt Sinn. Wo genau fängt die an? Steht dort ein Straßenschild? Die 10b hier ist noch Mörikestraße, richtig? Bei den ganzen anderen Häuser müsste noch die Adresse korrigiert werden.

VG
Yunan973 (2023-08-07 23:36:04+00:00): Hi,

I don't understand the geometry of the ways https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/35657836 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/35657835

Are you sure something is not missing, for example to have a U-turn way with https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1152348863 ?

Best regards
MascarinPeak (2023-08-09 09:14:39+00:00): Hello Yunan973, thanks for the question. Apple has an agreement with Maxar to use their more recent imagery to edit OpenStreetMap, which is not publicly available for editing OpenStreetMap. We generally use the imagery that is already available in JOSM but where we do use that more recent imagery, we always cite it and the date the imagery is from in the changeset source. The imagery shows that the link features (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/35657835 & https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/35657836) no longer provide connectivity between the main lanes highway Rodovia Governador Mário Covas (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/821828876 & https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/821828872) as there is a median that blocks the former configuration shown in older imagery.

It appears that the links on the south side (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/35657836 & https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/35657835) may be disused as well but it is not clear enough in imagery to remove them. If you are local to the area and have knowledge of them being taken out of use, it would be a big help if you could remove them or add the appropriate tagging (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused:*). Also it looks like some better alignment of the roads can be done here with Strava GPS traces. I will do that now. Thanks and have a nice day.
Yunan973 (2023-08-13 19:46:45+00:00): Ok.

On ggle streetview imagery is from 05/2022, the road is under construction but we can see in another way this area.

I changed the ways https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/35657836 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/35657835 into service.

I also tried to align roads.

Now I think we can "wait and see" (a better, newer imagery) but if you want to improve a little more, you're welcome.

Best regards
suchAnight (2023-08-16 15:27:25+00:00): Hello Yunan973, MascarinPeak is no longer on the team, so I will be handling this on their behalf. Thank you for making updates to this area. I made alignment updates to this https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1152348862 highway and this https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/35657835 highway. Have a nice day.
Colbertson (2023-03-21 12:41:30+00:00): Vai šī ēka ir tikai ieplānota, garām braucot neredzēju. Varbūt labāk ielikt kā https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:proposed:*
Colbertson (2025-06-19 12:25:16+00:00): Notiek celtniecība. Ēku varētu ielikt atpakaļ. Vienīgi nesaprotu no kāda avota pieejama informācija 2 gadus pirms celtniecības sākuma.
HellMap (2025-06-19 18:37:59+00:00): Balstoties uz citām kartētāja izmaiņām, drošvien no kaut kādiem pašvaldības dokumentiem, iespējams iekšējiem. Pateikšu tikai, ka jebkurā gadījumā, tā kā autors neatbild uz izmaiņu kopu komentāriem un avotu nenorāda, tad šādus droši var dzēst, jo nevienam nav jāmin, no kurienes iegūti dati.
OSM_RogerWilco (2023-03-07 08:33:31+00:00): Langenhagener Str: maxspeed und zone:traffic

Hier gilt jetzt maxspeed=50.
OSM_RogerWilco (2023-03-07 08:34:20+00:00): Quelle: survey
Langlaeufer (2023-03-07 09:02:42+00:00): Seit gestern? Ist mir am Sonntag noch nicht aufgefallen.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133393001
OSM_RogerWilco (2023-03-07 09:41:21+00:00): Ja genau.
map per (2023-03-09 18:22:18+00:00): Hello tkammasu,

please use good changeset comments (see (1)). The comment "Modified Geometry #amap" is rather misleading as you didn't change any geometry.

Thanks and best regards
map per

(1) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
tkammasu (2023-03-10 08:52:02+00:00): Hello,
Thank you for reviewing my changeset and flagging out the issue. I apologize for the incorrect comment. Going forward, I'll ensure to not repeat such errors again and comment according to changes the made, looking forward to learn more from you.
Regards,
tkammasu
silversurfer83 (2023-03-07 13:40:17+00:00): Hallo :)
Schön, dass Du einen Wanderweg eingetragen hast.

Ein Hinweis zu den Wegen, die Du als highway=unclassified eingetragen hast: Falls du weißt, was du tust, ist alles in Ordnung. Falls du dir unsicher bist, möchte ich dir noch diesen Artikel des OSM Wiki ans Herz legen:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dunclassified

Grüße in den Knuell
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133393299
Naturpark Knuell Walz (2023-03-08 09:32:08+00:00): Hallo, Danke für Deinen Hinweis (der mir als neuer Nutzer auch für andere Bereiche weiterhilft :-))! Ich habe gerade zur Sicherheit noch einmal alle Wegeabschnitte, die zum Wanderweg "gehören" überprüft. Der Abschnitt, der als "highway=unclassified" eingetragen ist, ist tatsächlich befahrbar für Autos und führt zu einem Gehöft. 
Viele Grüße
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-07 06:40:19+00:00): Cleaned up URL tracking tags and malformed opening hours for SEO POI Long Home Products in changeset 183765348

https://osm.org/changeset/183765348
sahilister (2023-03-07 13:53:13+00:00): Hi BhargavKrish2122, It's great seeing OSM contribution by you on improving roads in India. Just a suggestion, can narrow down the change areas on upload as the bbox shows changes pan-India and can't be truely figured what exact areas were changed. 

Thanks!
sahilister
Bittu_J (2023-04-04 05:00:05+00:00): Hi which aerial is updated aerial to refer?
Warin61 (2023-03-14 03:01:15+00:00): You do need to work on those errors/warnings. 

In this area JOSM validator reports some 16 errors and 121 warnings... 

Errors (16)
Duplicated ways (1)
Highway duplicated nodes (10)
Multipolygon is not closed (1)
Multipolygon ring contains segment twice (3)
Overlapping highways (1)
Warnings (121)
area on a relation (1)
Crossing building/highway (7)
Crossing highways (60)
highway=footway together with foot=no (1)
highway=footway together with maxspeed=40 (1)
missing tag - man_made=tower without tower:type (1)
Mixed type duplicated nodes (23)
node connects highway and building (3)
Route scheme is unspecified. Add public_transport:version (2=public_transport; 1=legacy) (1)
Self-intersecting polygon ring (1)
Unconnected nodes without physical tags - No tags (2)
Unnamed ways (12)
Way end node near other highway (8)
MurdochMaps (2023-03-14 03:44:38+00:00): Thanks Warin, how do I access the hyperlinks that link to each fault: error/
duplication/unclosed polygon/overlap/warning/crossing/missing tag........
Warin61 (2023-03-14 08:55:13+00:00): Don't know. 

One error visible here - site updates about every day and comes up with more slowly
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=115.83510&lat=-32.06858&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Other QA tools ..
https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?zoom=12&lat=-33.88489&lon=151.1875&layers=B0T&ch=0%2C30%2C70%2C120%2C380&show_ign=1&show_tmpign=1
https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?zoom=12&lat=-33.88489&lon=151.1875&layers=B0T&ch=0%2C30%2C70%2C120%2C380&show_ign=1&show_tmpign=1

------------
I am not an ID user so I cannot help you with that editor.
MichS (2023-03-08 04:48:39+00:00): Hallo.

Wurde mit der Schließung der Klink auch das Gebäude abgerissen?

MFG
MichS (2023-03-10 17:08:56+00:00): Da keine Rückmeldung zumindest das Gebäude wieder hergestellt
lapushkin (2023-03-07 08:58:43+00:00): Ссылки на запрещённые в РФ соцсети не оставлял, потому что, по логике, contact подразумевает, что человеку ответят, а там уже не отвечают
emersonveenstra (2023-03-08 11:57:38+00:00): Hi,

Same comments as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133395220, would you mind fixing https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1152360739 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1152360845

Thanks!
emersonveenstra (2023-03-08 12:00:18+00:00): again, see my comment on the other changeset, you're fine, sorry for bothering you
Polarbear (2023-08-27 21:52:58+00:00): Hallo Koljax,
wenn du Adressen hinzufügst, dann achte doch bitte vorher darauf, ob diese schon vorhanden sind. 
Du hast etliche Adressen als Node eingetragen, obwohl sie am Hausumring schon getaggt waren. 
Auch gib bitte am Changeset an, aus welcher Quelle du Adressen beziehst.
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-05 02:28:40+00:00): Thank you for mapping. It seems that a better changeset comment would have been more appropriate to understand.  Happy mapping.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133394474
iandees (2023-03-07 15:59:14+00:00): Please be more careful about how you connect roundabouts. The legs of the road do not connect at the point you connected them in this change. It should be back before the road separates.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133394862
Vera_D (2023-03-07 16:39:10+00:00): Hi! Thank you for your attention! I'll be more careful.
I already fixed the road legs connection - 133409974
Have a nice day)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133394862
AurélienQ (2025-08-24 10:41:57+00:00): Bonjour,
Es-tu sûr que le tag ''railway=tram'' est approprié avec "landuse=railway" ?
NorthCrab_upload (2023-03-07 09:30:15+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/481559316
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/481559303

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Iga | Yanosik (2023-03-07 09:33:52+00:00): Poprawione.
NorthCrab (2023-03-07 10:02:50+00:00): Dzięki !
emersonveenstra (2023-03-08 11:56:12+00:00): Hi,

For parking areas like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1152364547 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1152364546, please don't put 'unknown' as the access tag. If you aren't sure, it's best to leave it blank  (which implies 'unknown') so that other people and apps like StreetComplete can fill it in later when someone is sure of the access.

Would you mind fixing these? Thanks!
emersonveenstra (2023-03-08 11:59:49+00:00): Nevermind, I totally didn't read the wiki before posting this. unknown is an accepted value for access on parking lots, please ignore me and sorry for the unnecessary comments
flohoff (2023-03-07 12:03:52+00:00): Auch hier - mit dem bisher überall abgelehnten landuse=depot wird das nicht mehr gerendert.

Original tagging war schon richtig.

Flo
DaveF (2023-03-10 20:04:19+00:00): Hi
Why do you believe there's "no relation attached"?
DaveF (2023-03-10 20:15:03+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1013226609/history
etgg (2023-03-10 21:59:31+00:00): The relation had been removed by another user, it has now since been reinstated.
Langlaeufer (2023-03-07 09:53:51+00:00): Vorsicht mit smoothness=bad
D.h. totale Schlaglochpiste
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133395614
berung (2023-03-07 11:14:27+00:00): Das ist der Fall und nicht von mir eingetragen. Ich habe nur die Eignung für Fahrzeuge ergänzt (mindestens Trekkingrad).