piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NorthCrab_upload (2024-10-23 11:31:41+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2321959101
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/300077473

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/301404289

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
mueschel (2024-10-25 08:22:51+00:00): Hi,
You used many tags here that are not in use in any other place. Please use only tags that are described in the OSM Wiki or are available in the presets of your editor.
    This is necessary to make sure that every other user can understand the data.

    Examples:

    boys = yes
    elderly = yes
    facility_gps-Latitude = 6.5239817
    facility_gps-Longitude = 3.2312182
    facility_use = aluminum
facility manager = private/individual
    girls = yes
    men = yes
    plwd = yes
    status = functional
    women = yes
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-11-10 09:22:22+00:00): 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12281594064/history

is it really place SELLING water?
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-12-12 11:29:14+00:00): tried sending PM to them
ODULANA OLUWATOYIN (2025-01-30 14:20:59+00:00): they are the headings for the locational description ( longitude , and latitude)
ODULANA OLUWATOYIN (2025-01-30 14:21:39+00:00): what do you suggest to do for editing the headings for this categories ?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-02-03 20:30:09+00:00): > what do you suggest to do for editing the headings for this categories ?

latitude and longitude is specified by locating element at appropriate position and does not need to be included at all

> what do you suggest to do for editing the headings for this categories ?

depends 

is https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12281594064/history a shop selling water?

or is it a water storage tank, where water is stored by not a https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dwater ?
ODULANA OLUWATOYIN (2025-02-04 10:50:12+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12281594064/history indicating ownership to be private /individual , most are found in houses in the area
ODULANA OLUWATOYIN (2025-02-04 10:53:48+00:00): (You used many tags here that are not in use in any other place. Please use only tags that are described in the OSM Wiki or are available in the presets of your editor.)
This is necessary to make sure that every other user can understand the data.)


Hi, Thank you for the above , this is noted.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-02-04 14:32:45+00:00): BTW "Please use only tags that are described in the OSM Wiki or are available in the presets of your editor." is wrong and not correct.

It is strongly preferable to use such whenever feasible, but https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=ATYL is a thing
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-02-04 14:34:30+00:00): > https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12281594064/history indicating ownership to be private /individual , most are found in houses in the area

is https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12281594064/history a shop selling water, like ones described at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dwater ?


or is it a water storage tank, where water is stored for use in a given building?

(I am asking again as shop may be privately owned - though "most are found in houses in the area " seems pointing to it not being a shop)
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-05 15:20:49+00:00): send https://www.openstreetmap.org/messages/1236463
ODULANA OLUWATOYIN (2025-03-06 10:34:11+00:00): yes please, a shop selling water.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-06 14:20:12+00:00): then I changed it to shop=water from shop=Water 

to match established value for that ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dwater )
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-03 11:08:10+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12281594049 - is it really not used by men and boys and elderly?
ODULANA OLUWATOYIN (2025-12-04 10:52:22+00:00): If you mean the shop=water, it is used by the different groups.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-07-02 00:49:29+00:00): Then why it is marked as not used by boys and elderly?
adamos (2024-10-24 09:12:33+00:00): Ahoj, snažím se opravit relace v okolí Žiliny tak, aby vlaky vedly po provozovaných kolejích a byly úplné. Už dvakrát jsi mi relace u vlaků 240, 241 a Kysučan zase rozbil. Můžu se zeptat proč, případně co na opravených relacích bylo špatně? Díky Adam
MM_KE_MM (2024-10-26 13:21:07+00:00): Ahoj, úmyselne to určite nebolo, neviem prečo to urobilo ale relácie som pred publikovaním zmien, kontroloval, ak sa to stalo znovu, tak napíš čo treba a opravím.
adamos (2024-10-31 12:17:39+00:00): Ahoj, tak jsi relaci změnil potřetí a vlaky 240, 241 a Kysučan už zase nejsou v pořádku. :)

Používáš zřejmě JOSM, skoro se mi zdá, že stáhneš do JOSM nějaké relace / území, a pak edit děláš hodně dlouho, možná i více než den, a pak teprve uploaduješ na server. Mezitím já opravím relace, které ty následně přemažeš. ale to bys při uploadu měl vidět nějaké konflikty, vidíš tam něco takového? 
Konkrétně jde o changesety https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158178689 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158248325  a https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158375077. 
Poprosil bych tě, abys edity uploadoval co nejdříve a nenechával je rozpracované více než několik hodin. pak je minimální šance, že se budeme tlouct různými verzemi. Díky.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-03 11:00:21+00:00): Hello!

You used
colour=weiß
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12281605024/history

Have you maybe meant
colour=white
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
Robert46798 (2024-10-26 20:13:31+00:00): Hallo Juliane,
also ich würde sagen, dass ein weiteres "abendoned:" vor 'man_made' gehört. Wie es jetzt ist würde ich es als einen weiterhin genutzen Turm, aber nicht mehr als Funkturm, lesen. Der Website zufolge verfällt aber gerade der ganze Turm. Entsprechend sollte das Tagging sich auch auf den ganzen Turm beziehen.
Ich bin aber auch kein Experte auf dem Gebiet :-)

Viele Grüße,
Robert
skyper (2024-11-07 16:07:34+00:00): Hallo Blubberbernd,
leider ist Dein Eintragen der separaten Trottoirs immer noch sehr schlampig. Es fehlen sehr viele Verbindungen an den Kreuzungen, was das Routing kaputt macht. Z.B. ist https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1327501271 praktisch eine Insel. Weiterhin vergisst Du die Tags der Straße anzupassen, insbesondere `sidewalk=*`. Bitte überprüfe alle Deine Änderungen bezüglich diese Thema erneut und korrigiere die Daten. Die Überprüfung sollte auch Altlasten wie z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128364135 beinhalten.

Des Weiteren ist Kommunikation bei OSM wichtig. Leider scheinst Du Dich an Diskussionen über Deine Änderungen nicht zu beteiligen, was aus https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=1405221 hervorgeht.
Ich habe keine Lust Dir andauernd hinterherzuräumen.

skyper


https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Sidewalks
Stefan_LS (2025-01-27 23:57:33+00:00): Gibt es einen Grund, wieso du highway von via_ferrata auf footway geändert hast?
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-07 23:29:34+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164655836
Black_Diamond (2024-10-24 13:58:27+00:00): Please revert this change. Your change makes the name no longer match the street signs. The street signs say Wolf Road and doesn’t have the cardinal name North. Some property records do include North in the name, which is why that is the alternate name. Both names are valid, but name should reflect the ground truth when navigating.
marialoyko (2024-10-25 05:58:40+00:00): Hi, thanks for the comment and I apologise for the inconvenience, I noticed alt_name now. I revert changes. Have a greate day!
Hadi Omid (2024-10-23 12:55:34+00:00): سلام
ویرایش شما باعث به هم ریختگی مسیرهای نقشه شده.
لطفا قبل از ویرایش نقشه آموزش ببینید
ممنون
OddlyAngled (2024-10-23 13:14:06+00:00): should this node be expanded to an area that includes the mine shaft? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/369167242
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158250142
Anon153231 (2025-08-13 12:11:32+00:00): Where has this name come from? Locally the whole road is known as Monyash Road.
grzegorz75jan (2024-10-27 22:06:04+00:00): Witam. Faktycznie są tam zmiany nie wiem jeszcze czy to zmiana właściciela. Strony www funkcjonują póki co równolegle ale nie odnoszą się do zmiany. Poprzednia dom i ogród zawiera błędne godziny otwarcia a na greentar nic o tym obiekcie nie ma. Zmieniłem godziny otwarcia na aktualne. Dorzucam parę fotek https://1drv.ms/f/c/ab9a641073738c11/EtRkxYQfiEBAgcBjw5z8OcoB6nQ53baLylEhyRG15RYLuQ?e=ZA47dT

Mam wątpliwości co do obrysu budynku ponieważ podkład budynków pokazuje dwa obrysy a w rzeczywistości są one jednak jakoś połączone z tym że lewa strona obita sajdingiem częściowo jest częścią sklepu a skrajna lewa to raczej biuro i zaplecze. Tak czy siak dla Yanosika i innych aplikacji oraz użytkowników liczy się obiekt. Prawdopodobnie było to budowane osobno i finalnie zrobili połączenie, dostawili jeden do drugiego a obrys z podkładu może być deko błędny. (przejście) pomiędzy nimi. Będzie coś więcej wiadomo to się zrobi edycję. Może tymczasowo warto dać old name ze starą nazwą sklepu ?
Sebastian | Yanosik (2024-10-28 06:38:05+00:00): Cześć! Rzeczywiście wg EGiBu, obrysy są dwa. Generalnie nie robi to dużej różnicy, ani wizualnej, ani technicznej (przynajmniej dla mnie). Co do old_name, jak najbardziej możesz dodać jeśli uważasz to za stosowne, ja nie jestem zwolennikiem "oldów", bo po co trzymać nieaktualne dane, skoro stara nazwa nie funkcjonuje? ;)
grzegorz75jan (2024-10-28 17:42:25+00:00): Old name mi przyszło mi do głowy pozytywnie złośliwie i musiałbym o tym poczytać bo raczej nie używałem jeszcze a poważniej to po prostu przez jakiś czas ktoś (klient, kierowca dostawca) może z głupia szukać Dom i Ogród i się zawiesi :)

Dziś kolejny raz miałem tam dzwonić i ani czasu ani warunków na to. Sam edytuję sporadycznie oraz czasem przeglądam zmiany. Luzik.
eggie (2024-10-23 12:28:20+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback bollard= pollerinzinkbaar_paaltje doet niet in OSM en ook niet in LiveNav.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dbollard

Je zou barrier=bollard met bollard=removable kunnen gebruiken. 
Daar is dan een sleutel iod voor nodig.
bollard=rising bestaat ook, maar dat zijn van die paaltjes waar je overheen kunt bij groen licht.
Up to you

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-10-23 12:30:19+00:00): Voorlopig aangepast naar removable
Mahdi Nameghi (2024-10-23 15:33:01+00:00): کاش بکشید بیرون از این جاده
پاره کردین بخدا
TrickyFoxy (2024-10-23 12:34:40+00:00): Тестируйтесь, пожалуйста, тут https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/
Stahlmann (2025-01-05 15:03:12+00:00): Ich bin mal so frei und setze die mit dieser Änderung gelösten Issues auf "geschlossen".
eggie (2024-10-23 17:25:32+00:00): Dag Ben .. motor_vehicle=no hoeft niet op een paaltje.
De default is ...=no

Nu kunnen moped en mofa er niet langs.
Die zijn per default=yes.
Net als voetgangers en fietsers.
LiveNav laat bij removable hulpvoertuigen door.
Groet..
eggie
eggie (2024-10-23 17:45:41+00:00): aangepast
eggie (2024-11-26 07:57:10+00:00): Dag C Batenburg   Schuiven met de kaart in editmodus geeft vaak schade.

Nu verander je ongemerkt iets in Gorcum.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-11-26 08:04:14+00:00): Een highway=residential is inmiddels verwijderd bij de Papendrechtsebrug..  
Verbinding Zalmsteeg met Willem Dreeslaan? 
Waar komt die weg vandaan? Die is er toch niet.
Wellicht een tijdelijke bouwweg, maar dat is geen highway=residential als doorgaande weg. 
Je krijgt anders een wonderlijke routering. 
Ik zie dat een medemapper die weer heeft verwijderd. 
Groet
eggie
frydzio (2024-10-24 09:38:26+00:00): Hej,
Zakazy w ciągu Polski Walczącej są poprawne i wynikają z zastosowania sygnalizatorów kierunkowych do skrętu w lewo. W ciągu ul. Batalionu AK "Bałtyk" (póki co) skręca się w lewo na zielonym ogólnym i nie ma znaków zakazu zawracania więc te restrykcje są niepoprawne.
Tomek | Yanosik (2024-10-24 10:38:37+00:00): Hej, dziękuję za uszczegółowienie. Poprawiłem zgodnie z informacją.
eggie (2024-10-23 18:02:36+00:00): Dag Spughetti,

Alle gebouwen in OSM zijn het resultaat van import vanuit de BAG/Kadaster.
Niet alle gebouwen zijn automatisch rechthoekig. 
Alles is precies ingemeten.
Wat is je bron om gebouwen te gaan aanpassen.
Zo maar een vraag?
MVG
eggie
spughetti_tomtom (2024-10-24 07:17:55+00:00): Hey eggie,

Ik gebruik voornamelijk aerial imagery en street-level imagery wanneer het beschikbaar is. Het schijnt dat ik met dit gebouw inderdaan een fout heb gemaakt. 'Tis nu gefixt. 😸

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158283060

Cheers
eggie (2024-10-24 07:20:25+00:00): 👍
eggie (2024-10-24 08:27:59+00:00): 'k Vraag  me trouwens af of het zin heeft om in het algemeen gebrouwen aan te passen. Wanneer er een periodieke update wordt uitgevoerd is alles weer als vanouds. Het is immers import.
Echte fouten kun je dan beter melden bij de BAG.
Wanneer iets nog niet is ingemeten en het lang duurt voordat de BAG is bijgewerkt pas ik iets soms met de hand aan. Bv in een nieuwe wijk.. Of ik laat herimporteren zodra de BAG is bijgewerkt. 
Groet,
eggie
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-10-25 21:41:42+00:00): Highway tag deleted. fake name.
All your changes have been reverted
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158251958
clamemmel (2024-10-31 07:22:01+00:00): Was wurde hier geändert?
Dieser Pfad ist immer noch so eingezeichnet, wo er nicht ist.
Ich ging auf dem östlichen Weg, nachdem ich aus Osten über den Pfad (über den Hälobach) kam. Dann wollte ich den fraglichen Pfad nehmen um auf die westlich gelegenen anderen Wege zu kommen.
Am aktuellen Verbindungspunkt am Ostende des fraglichen Pfads ist eine Klippe über ca. 2 m. Hier kann kein Pfad sein. Im Bereich 20-50 m weiter südlich ist die Steigung deutlich flacher, hier habe ich versucht, durch den Wald zu kommen.
Aber es war kein Weg erkennbar, und der Boden war an leicht steileren Stellen sehr rutschig, und es war viel Gestrüpp im Weg, sodass ich umgekehrt bin.

Daher würde mich interessieren, wo genau ich den Weg durch den Wald hätte suchen sollen.
mcliquid (2024-10-31 07:25:21+00:00): > Was wurde hier geändert?

trail_visibility=intermediate → no
ManuelB701 (2024-10-23 13:10:04+00:00): I know this turn restriction, I didn't know it wasn't already added.

I've also corrected because "except=*" only applies to vehicles (i.e. vehicle type "private" isn't defined) so you have to use "restriction:conditional=*" and with the type of access and "Anlieger frei" means "destination", not "private".
ManuelB701 (2024-10-23 13:11:35+00:00): Also, splitting the road up to the next intersections isn't necessary for turn restrictions, it only creates fragmentations.
Anton Kasheuski (2024-10-24 06:48:34+00:00): Hi, Manuel! Thank you for your feedback and explanation of my edit. I thought that such application of restriction with except is correct, since we have already seen such tagging on the map made by other mappers; also in OSM itself in restriction, there is a section "exceptions" and in the sliding window various options of exceptions are offered: psv, bus, hgv, destination, residents etc. Therefore, there was an opinion that except can be applied not only with vehicles. Unfortunately, I did not find detailed information regarding such tagging in OSM-Wiki. Therefore, if you have a link to the necessary source, information, then I ask you to share with me, so that in the future I can take all the points into account and avoid such mistakes. Thank you in advance!
ManuelB701 (2024-10-24 11:00:50+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction

There is no dedicated page for "except" (though there are reasons for it or at least a subsection on that page) but the page does lists various vehicle modes for this tag only and also mentions "vehicle mode" which implies that exceptions are granted for vehicles (i.e. access as in the key), not for access-values (i.e. access as in the value).
Anton Kasheuski (2024-10-24 12:01:55+00:00): Thank you for the answer about exceptions. But I would also like to ask where I can read more about such tagging: "restriction:conditional=none @ destination". On the page of the OSM Wiki about conditional restrictions we can find that the value "none @ ..." can only be used with numerical restriction value, not with usual restriction.
ManuelB701 (2024-10-25 05:16:26+00:00): That's an interesting point because it felt natural to me to use it and according to the talk page, many mappers also used "none" to denote non-vehicular access exceptions (and routers probably override the restriction value with a "none" which isn't defined so safe effect).
Still, this very much should spark up some external discussion — which I just did on the talk page.
Anton Kasheuski (2024-10-25 13:38:58+00:00): That's great! I hope this way of restrictions tagging will be described in more detail on the OSM wiki. And again, thanks for the response!
4004 (2024-10-26 21:25:16+00:00): bonjour, I don't think you've improved osm data with this change:
- the shape of the polygon you added doesn't match the water tower (they are circular)
- this is not a building
hhrazaka (2024-10-27 13:10:58+00:00): Bonjour, Thank you for your feedback. The suggestion was from Maproulette: "Convert man_made=water_tower node to area". I must have mapped the area incorrectly. Best regards.
rempshaener (2024-10-23 16:59:29+00:00): Hallo,
du hast um einen Review gebeten.
Ich denke, das mit dem highway=track passt nicht. Das wäre ein "Wirtschaftsweg, der u. a. hauptsächlich für die Land- oder Forstwirtschaft, untergeordnet z.B. für die Wasserwirtschaft genutzt wird". tracktype=grade1 passt auch nicht zu surface=ground.
Meintest du vielleicht highway=path?
Viele Grüße
rasterfahndung (2024-10-23 19:23:43+00:00): Hallo, danke für dein Feedback. Du hast recht. Pfad passt besser.
HellMap (2024-11-23 17:14:05+00:00): Hello,

Please do not change way designations like this based on subjective reasons like "primary use". The legal designation of most of these ways is a cycleway as seen by traffic signs.

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lv:Latvian_tagging_guidelines#Veloce%C4%BCi_un_veloinfrastrukt%C5%ABra and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Verifiability

Mapping this as `highway=cycleway` is correct (or `path` in JOSM, but this is rarely used locally and almost never in Riga). A `footway` implies no such signage is present.

I have undone this edit and also corrected some of the crossings/connections to be more accurate where the signage is located.

Thanks
sunwincompe (2024-10-23 13:41:37+00:00): https://sunwin.com.pe/
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/16MhjKwZPBdFaUpXTw6Jjx-N8Mjr0GQVP
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1W_1MV_oTeDbm9PL_dXQ9502iOTCVHp02lUBvy8GNE_Y/edit?usp=drivesdk
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1IrVZT7bz2-C-qm7BZRNv0SnN7fEWYbkc
https://sites.google.com/view/sunwincompe/home
https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer?mid=1S4WLbld1FRCd9xY6sEx9qbtb_qpWLP8
https://sunwincompe.blogspot.com/2024/10/sunwin.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T8RzzV5QAis
https://x.com/sunwincompe/status/1848997287743402283
https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/ti-sunwin40/episodes/Ti-Sunwin-Mi-Nht-2024-Cng-Game-Bi-i-Thng-S-1-e2q1dp6
https://www.scoop.it/topic/https-com-pe/p/4161921372/2024/10/23/sunwin-apk-ios-game-bai-oi-thuong-hap-dan-de-choi
Filip009 (2024-10-26 08:34:49+00:00): Zdravím, prečo to mazanie adresy, keď podľa katastra je dobre?
Gregory Peony (2024-10-26 17:02:35+00:00): The buildings in this changeset have not been appropriately squared. When working with low resolution imagery zoom in and out to get the best chance of determining the shape and orientation of features. If this does not help then you should assume that buildings are either square or round if the reolution is so low that you cannot distinguish more complex shapes, because those are common building shapes. Thank you for your contribution.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158254203
silversurfer83 (2024-10-23 16:08:52+00:00): Hi :)

kleiner Hinweis:
Bei Kindergärten (und Schulen und so) kommen die ganzen Details, die sich auf die Einrichtung beziehen auf den Geländeumriss. Hier gab es schon einen passenden Umriss mit name und amenity. Habe daher deine Daten mal rübergeschoben.
Das Gebäude, wenn es als Kindergarten gebaut wurde, bekommt nur "building=kindergarten" und sonstige Gebäuderelevanten tags.
Kannst ggf. mal deine anderen aktuellen Änderungen dazu kurz ansehen, ob das dort auch zutrifft.

cheers
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158254407
Gregory Peony (2024-10-26 02:43:42+00:00): These building footprints are valid, but they are not accurate, nor appropriately squared. It is common for buildings to have square corners. Check how this area looks like in OSM or select the OSM carto layer in ID editor to see what it might look like to someone using this map. The areas you draw must be close to square in order fot the function to work. WAY: 1327526789 for example is probably too far from square to be made square by pressing q. WAY: 1327526800 is the best footprint in this set, please map more similar to that in future and remember to square the corners when appropriate. Thank you for your contribution.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158254456
mcliquid (2024-11-06 14:44:12+00:00): Grüß dich, ich habe den Parkplatz hier zu parking=street_side umgeändert. Siehe dazu auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:parking=street_side
Gregory Peony (2024-10-24 23:59:35+00:00): Buildings and roads should rarely overlap or share nodes. That may be the case at a petrol station where the road passes under a 'roof' but generally they should not becasuse it could affect some routing software. When in close proximity to other digitized features hold Alt to prevent your cursor from snapping to them. 

I have modified these features to provide an example. Some of the building 'outlines' do not match up with the roofs in the imagery. This is because we are aiming to map the building footprint (where the walls meet the ground) so that the map is accurate in 2D. Check the OSM carto imagery layer to get an idea of what your mappings look like to others.

Thank you for your contribution. I hope my feedback helps you to improve the quality of your mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158254555
Gregory Peony (2024-10-24 23:28:30+00:00): Well done! You identified buildings in the imagery and I don't think that you outlined anything other than a buiilding. The buildings' footprints however, are not accurate. The low resolution imagery does not help, but you need to interpret the imagery and give buildings realistic shapes rather than tracing distorted imagery or artefacts. I recommend that you find a task area where Mapbox imagery shows on the whole the same buildings, because it has a greater resolution in this area. This will allow you to compare what the same buildings look like with different levels of resolution. When you must work with low resolution imagery zoom out first to ascertain the shape and orientation of buildings, then zoom in to digitize them accurately (you can repeat this of course if you forget the shape for example). Quality > Quantity.

Thank you for your contribution.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158255095