piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Oregonian3 (2025-10-22 19:22:28+00:00): Wikipedia is not a reliable source for information on exact highway routings. Ground signage and state databases (https://maps.udot.utah.gov/uplan_data/documents/HRO/ for Utah) are much more reliable, although still not infallible.
dknelson9876 (2025-10-23 01:17:26+00:00): Literally part of the quote that you omitted in your first [...] is "Prior to 1997, this connection was direct". Meaning that the connection is no longer direct, and you must first leave SR 201 to continue on it.
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-10-23 04:18:22+00:00): Okay, I guess that makes sense. I'll put that on me for misinterpreting the text. Thanks!
Gregory Peony (2025-09-21 03:03:46+00:00): Hello, the footpritns you mapped here all represent buildings. They could better reflect the imagery. Often they were larger than they appeared in the imagery. See how I mapped them in https://osmcha.org/changesets/ 

The following is a general comment about mapping building footprints;

When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom in so that you can see the outline of the building and mark the corners carefully. Exclude shadows and yards when tracing the footprint. Keep in mind that you are looking at the [roofs of buildings](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape#Roof_shape), but mapping their footprints. Depending on how the scene is lit, pitched roofs may have light and dark sections that belong to one building. Generally pitched roofs overhang the walls of a building, so a footprint slightly smaller than the roof is accurate. You can scale selected features in ID with shift+(-/+), or JOSM with ctrl.+alt+Lclick & drag.  Take care to make contributions that others can build upon.

Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
Gregory Peony (2025-09-21 03:04:46+00:00): This is the correct link to my changeset https://osmcha.org/changesets/172228201
felipeeugenio (2025-09-21 11:32:54+00:00): Hola Alexis.
Que sea una servidumbre y un =service son cosas comletamente distintas.
Es un camino de acceso restringido? tiene portones en algún lado? Con esa información te podemos ayudar.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172228098
Joseph R P (2025-09-24 01:39:08+00:00): I would probably keep these terminal roads down at secondary just because they are important roads but not important through routes/arterials like Russell or Paradise Road, and only serve airport traffic.

On another note, I recommend avoiding tagging roads like this one (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/204632888) as links. 'Link' is a very ambiguous term as it could be interpreted as anything in the scop of roads, but in OSM, this refers to almost exclusively unnamed roadways such as exit ramps, right and left turn slip lanes, and median breaks that focus on providing U-turns. This sort of road I linked is better tagged as a service or unclassified road.
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-09-24 01:57:37+00:00): Okay, I'll go change them back.
dcapillae (2025-09-21 08:42:39+00:00): Buenos días.

Las etiquetas de dirección se añaden a los PDI o a los nodos de entrada. Evite añadirlas a los contornos de los edificios si ya existen etiquetas de dirección en el nodo de entrada. En este caso, las etiquetas de dirección están en la verja de entrada del complejo. El nodo que identifica al Metro de Málaga también tiene sus propias etiquetas de dirección.

Atentamente,

Daniel Capilla
Gregory Peony (2025-09-21 03:28:54+00:00): Well done I dentifying this building. It looks like you used ESRI for support which is a good idea. In this area I used mapbox which shows a clear view of this building. See how I mapped it in https://osmcha.org/changesets/172228515 --- Thank you for your contribution.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172228483
BudgieInWA (2025-09-26 04:41:40+00:00): Thanks for processing my varied (and often pedantic) notes! I love to see the processes in action that keep the map updated to changes (in addition to all the features being newly added).

Cheers
Gregory Peony (2025-09-21 04:11:01+00:00): Hello, the footprints here represent buildings but are generally larger than in imagery. 

I think you'll be able to see how I mapped these buildings in https://osmcha.org/changesets/172228835Thank you for your contribution.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172228812
Gregory Peony (2025-09-21 04:17:13+00:00): When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom in so that you can see the outline of the building and mark the corners carefully. Exclude shadows and yards when tracing the footprint. Keep in mind that you are looking at the [roofs of buildings](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape#Roof_shape), but mapping their footprints. Depending on how the scene is lit, pitched roofs may have light and dark sections that belong to one building. Generally pitched roofs overhang the walls of a building, so a footprint slightly smaller than the roof is accurate. You can scale selected features in ID with shift+(-/+), or JOSM with ctrl.+alt+Lclick & drag.  Take care to make contributions that others can build upon.

See how I mapped these footprints in https://osmcha.org/changesets/172229127
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172229006
NeatNit (2025-09-26 22:17:05+00:00): Hi,
In this changeset and in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172102990 you accidentally used the tag gtfs:stop_id:IL-MOT 3 times. This seems to be because the gtfs:stop_id tag already existed for those elements, so I guess the autocomplete filled in the next most common tag with that prefix when you tried to add the stop_id.

I'll remove the tags, just letting you know about the mistake so you can avoid it in the future :)

P.S. The gtfs:stop_id:IL-MOT tag is filled and used by https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Gtfs2osm , which is used in Israel. It's a script that I run daily (when I remember) to update bus stops data. Do you think this would be useful for your region as well?
donmac703 (2025-09-29 02:44:45+00:00): Thanks, sorry about that.
The autocomplete can sometimes be a hindrance when a lot of edits need to be done. :-(
At this point, I am only trying to expand geographical coverage, and map primary routes. routes.txt has 10K entries and stops.txt has 170K, so synchronisation is likely going to be a ways off.
NeatNit (2025-09-29 07:36:49+00:00): At this stage gtfs2osm only synchronizes bus stops, not routes. I'm not sure yet how to tackle route import/sync, it is a much bigger challenge. Instead I spent some efforts improving PTNA: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Public_Transport_Network_Analysis

Size is not an issue. Israel has some 30k bus stops and the script handles it gracefully. I think even 170k is not going to be an issue, save for OSM rate limits.

If the GTFS data is reliable enough, the script can effectively import it the first time it's ran, and thereafter just keep OSM updated whenever new GTFS data is available.
lamms (2025-09-21 04:55:03+00:00): If these are corridors inside a building I think a better tag would be `highway=corridor`
`indoor=yes`? At least thats what I can glean from the wiki :)
deanleggo (2025-09-22 23:59:45+00:00): Yeah, I had made it the same as the mall next door. I've now changed the mall and shopping centre to corridor.
j333-1145 (2025-10-20 11:55:28+00:00): 你好，东堤路和桥湖南路中间没有物理障碍（比如栅栏什么的）。我想把它们改称一条路。谢谢。

以前不知道道路绘画规则，就画成两条路，现在想修复错误。
YPGGUUY (2025-12-02 17:41:33+00:00): 复 @j333-1145: 如果路中具有双黄线或导流线, 按我国交通法车辆不能越过或掉头; 或路宽超过一定程度, 不利行人横越的, 我赞同画成双线路. 这样对于维护公交关系, 行人和自行车导航都有显著好处. 比如从路的一侧步行/骑行/驾驶到另外一侧, 导航会寻找人行横道或路口, 而非单纯两点的连线.
社区对该问题还未达成共识, 因此我无意说服您接受我的观点, 在此谨提出供您参考. 我不认为您之前的画法是错误或不可取的.
jmarchon (2025-09-23 03:29:52+00:00): Welcome to OSM!
GPS-GR (2025-09-21 06:35:15+00:00): RE: Changeset: 172230729
The Speed Limit Changes were on LAKE Drive SE and NOT Burton St SE.  I didn't notice the wrong description until after it was submitted.  I'm posting this note as I don't know if editing description of a submitted changeset is possible. The changes were accurate.. just wrong street name in the description.
eggie (2025-09-24 08:34:41+00:00): Dag Adrie.. Svp bij upload concreet commentaar toevoegen met wat je hebt gedaan.

MVG
eggie
limes11 (2025-09-21 09:40:37+00:00): Moin, 

wenn w58165298 noch ein motor_vehicle=agricultural hat, sollte es ein track bleiben. Ist das noch so beschildert ?

VG
CaptainCarte (2025-09-23 14:19:34+00:00): Nein, ich habe kein entsprechendes Schild gesehen und es sind mehrere nicht landwirtschafliche Autos hier gefahren. Vielleicht habe ich aber auch einfach im Gebüsch übersehen.
eggie (2025-09-21 07:59:22+00:00): Dag  DAO  Het fietspad eindigt aan de zuidzijde op de Minervasingel. Daar mag kennelijk niet gefietst worden. Hoe kan dat laatste stuk een fietspad zijn?
Aan de noordzijde is het bruggetje met toegangswegen nog steeds een highway=service. Los van het feit dat dat niet lekker routeert voor fietsers op kaarten is dat wellicht nu ook een fietspad? 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-09-21 08:05:41+00:00): Fietspadaansluiting aangepast aan de zuidzijde mbv meer recente luchtfoto.
eggie (2025-09-21 08:31:34+00:00): Alle aansluitingen nu aangepast zodat het fietspad ook daadwerkelijk routeert.
Niet meer bestaande wegen verwijderd. 

Wellicht heb je hier iets aan.

https://viewer.satellietdataportaal.nl/@51.96324,5.843635,19/?datastrip=20250620_SVNEO-01

MVG
eggie
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-11 06:51:57+00:00): Cleaned up remaining SEO spam tags and fixed addr:street=* typo for building with former Regent Restoration POI in changeset 183955726

https://osm.org/changeset/183955726
NorthCrab_upload (2025-09-21 07:10:50+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11134291303

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Gregory Peony (2025-09-21 07:42:27+00:00): The acuracy of footprints you mapped here is very good. I think the SE footprint represents a rock beside a waterway and that one of the other footprints represents vegetation becasue of its colour. Thank you for your contribution.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172232026
Gregory Peony (2025-09-21 07:54:42+00:00): Hi Tebby, This footprint you added includes its southern shadow. Please exclude shadows when tracing footprints. This becomes especially improtant when mapping in dense areas and space is limited. Thank you for your contribution. see how I mapped it in https://osmcha.org/changesets/172233071
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172232202
eggie (2025-09-21 07:52:59+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
CurlingMan13 (2025-10-13 02:43:50+00:00): If you are adding these as a result of notes, please close the notes.
mavl (2025-09-22 13:33:45+00:00): Здравствуйте. Вы почти все дороги называете "Дорога" (name=дорога). Подскажите, пожалуйста, откуда вы берёте эту информацию?
Hinojal (2025-09-21 10:13:44+00:00): Thank you for your edits on Madeira :D.
user_5359 (2025-09-22 19:03:51+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/13159266218. What is the mean of the tag "loại tiền:VNĐ"="yes"
disc24 (2025-09-24 09:26:50+00:00): Hallo Sarah,
Du hast in diesem Änderungssatz einen neuen, etwas seltsamen Fussweg eingetragen.
Der Fussweg geht quer über einen bestehenden Feldweg und ist mit Zugangsbeschränkungen (privat) versehen.
War das ein Versehen, sollte da der ursprüngliche Feldweg angepasst werden oder gabs da einen anderen Grund für?
Ich denke, so wie es jetzt eingetragen ist, kann man das leider nicht lassen.
Viele Grüße
Dirk
Sarah Weick (2025-09-24 10:27:23+00:00): Hallo Dirk, 
leider konnte ich die Markierung nicht auf den vorgegeben Feldweg setzen. Daher der misslungene Versuch. 
Wenn Du mir erklärst, wie ich das ändern kann, mache ich das gerne.
Vielen Dank und liebe Grüße
Sarah
disc24 (2025-09-25 06:46:50+00:00): Da müsste natürlich der betroffene Feldweg editiert werden. Ich weiss nicht, warum das nicht geklappt hat.
Grundsätzlich muss so eine Sperrung natürlich auch erstmal am Weg beschildert sein, bevor man sowas eintragen kann. Gibt es da eine entsprechende offizielle Beschilderung? Wenn kein Schild vorhanden ist, kommt z.B. auch der nächste Mapper irgendwann an der Stelle vorbei, sieht kein Schild und macht die Änderung wieder rückgängig.
Falls eine Schranke vorhanden ist, kann man die natürlich eintragen. Die würde die Benutzung und Routing des Weges für Fahrzeuge verhindern, nicht aber für Fussgänger und Radfahrer. Die von Dir eingetragene Privat-Einschränkung würde da aber keinen Unterschied machen und wäre daher wahrscheinlich falsch.
Sarah Weick (2025-09-25 07:05:29+00:00): Änderung hat geklappt. 
Ja, es ist ordnungsgemäß ausgeschildert. LG
disc24 (2025-09-26 15:37:28+00:00): Bei OpenstreetMap wird bei solchen privaten Sperrungen schon genauer nachgehakt.
Der Weg ist seit 17 Jahren in OSM eingetragen, ist im NRW Liegenschaftskataster vorhanden und darüber geht auch eine offizielle Wanderroute vom Sauerländischen Gebirgsverein. Mich wundert schon ein wenig, warum der jetzt auf einmal auch für Fussgänger und Radfahrer gesperrt sein soll. Genau das bewirkt die von Dir gemachte gemachte Einschränkung nämlich.
Ich bitte Dich daher, mal beim folgendem Link zu schauen und die Einschränkung an die offizielle Beschilderung am Weg anzupassen.
https://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/
VG
Dirk
Sarah Weick (2025-09-29 07:26:11+00:00): Hallo Dirk,
wir wollten als Grundstückseigentümer hier nur darüber informieren, dass der Weg geschlossen ist. 
Ich danke Dir für den Hinweis mit dem SGV. Diesen informieren wir auch. 
LG Sarah
M!dgard (2025-09-21 17:56:07+00:00): Hi,

> remodel the block to fit Bing satellite images

In the Netherlands the buildings are regularly discarded and re-imported from the cadastral records (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/BAGimport), so it's not that useful to do improvements to non-special buildings.

Also, when using aerial imagery, keep in mind that we (try to) map the building's footprint, while on imagery you see the roof, so: 1) protrusions on the roof should not be mapped and 2) you should correct for the roof not being directly over the footprint since the images are taken slightly obliquely. Take a look at walls and building shadows to see this on the imagery itself.

Also keep in mind that the buildings that have been imported in Belgium and the Netherlands have their outlines measured on the terrain by professional surveyors. Aerial imagery always has some offset and deformations (they don't appear magically, the images taken by the aeroplane/satellite need to be aligned and processed), so trust the outlines.

Happy mapping!
AndyB_66 (2025-09-21 10:38:05+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
grzegorz75jan (2025-09-21 10:46:31+00:00): Exactly.
Almost all of his changes do not include changelogs.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172233683
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-28 12:37:07+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/844162978/history has addr:housenumber = building that was added in this edit
Are you sure this building has "building" as an address number?
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-12 07:37:00+00:00): Cleaned up remaining SEO spam and other tagging for Dogtopia POI in changeset 184003140

https://osm.org/changeset/184003140
Lumikeiju (2025-11-29 01:08:41+00:00): Hi! What is meant by "light:count=4.20"?
OttoR (2025-11-29 13:51:36+00:00): Probably a typo. fixed it to be 4
NorthCrab_upload (2025-09-21 08:40:52+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/892409082

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2025-09-21 08:50:51+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/892409082

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Gregory Peony (2025-09-21 09:21:08+00:00): Hello Myles, You identified and mostly mapped individual buildings and generally tagged them correctly. 

The footprints you added could be more accurate please watch this short video about mapping building footprints in ID. https://youtu.be/Xs5wX592E1o 

Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution.
Gregory Peony (2025-09-21 09:28:05+00:00): I mapped a few of these in https://osmcha.org/changesets/172236104 to show you what a good one looks like.
kuhni74 (2026-03-20 09:06:08+00:00): see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural=caldera
user_5359 (2025-09-22 19:07:07+00:00): Hello! Please use currency:VND instead of currency:VNĐ!
ivanbranco (2026-02-07 18:07:16+00:00): Hi SekeRob,

at this link https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1116120416 the tag lit=48 is used. Was this meant to be a different tag or value?

More generally, I noticed that several uncommon values for the key lit appear to have been added by you. Could you please review them and adjust where needed?: https://taginfo.geofabrik.de/europe:italy/keys/lit#values

Thanks.
Moiety (2025-09-21 09:18:31+00:00): Wil iemand de ralations controleren? Ik ben er nog niet achter hoe ik die kan aanpassen in JOSM
eggie (2025-09-21 09:33:56+00:00): De busroutes kloppen nu inderdaad niet meer.
Je zult dus een route De Klomp-Centrum aan de noordkant moeten leggen.
en de visaversa route aan de zuidkant. 
Welke routes je nodig hebt kun je het beste op het al gescheiden deel aan de westkant zien.
Je opent dan het relatievenster en dan is het een kwesie van op je juiset plaats toevoegen zodat de delen netje aansluiten.
Eerst alle relaties binnenhalen! De rotonde nog splitsen op de juiste plaats en een stukje route verijderen.
Een busroute heeft geen role  forward en backward nodig.
eggie
eggie (2025-09-21 09:36:54+00:00): Eerst beide relaties binnenhalen anders krijg je een gatenkaas in de relatiedelen. 
Dan gaan puzzelen. De meeste mappers wagen zich er niet aan dus zie het als een uitdaging. Mocht het dan niet lukken kan ik het wel weer aanpassen.
Moiety (2025-09-21 09:58:22+00:00): Volgens mij heb ik het nu goed gezet; inderdaad even puzzelen.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172236902
eggie (2025-09-21 10:01:42+00:00): Het klopt nu. Ik heb alleen bicycle=use_sidepath toegevoegd vanaf die fietspadsplitsing.
Groet,
eggie
Moiety (2025-09-21 10:30:40+00:00): Ah, dank! En bedankt voor de tips :)
eggie (2025-09-21 09:42:09+00:00): Hoi.. Probeer bij te taggen op de bestaande adresnodes..
Dus geen adressen aanmaken.
Mapse
eggie
Pebox (2025-09-21 10:24:40+00:00): Hey eggie, 
Thanks for the note
Created another version https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172238100#map=19/52.336535/4.875771
eggie (2025-09-21 10:28:40+00:00): 👍
simsurace (2025-10-06 15:38:19+00:00): Was bedeutet "railway:switch"=503? Sollte das nicht auf "default" gesetzt werden?
eggie (2025-09-21 10:12:57+00:00): Het klopt nu.
Moiety (2025-09-21 17:08:35+00:00): Bedankt voor de controle!
sorcrosc (2025-10-05 10:52:17+00:00): Anche qui, la corsia ciclabile su via Canale Albani era mappata correttamente come parte della strada. Quella che hai tracciato è una pista ciclabile separata. Non è questo il caso.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle
Senihtu (2025-10-08 18:59:34+00:00): Hi!
Weißt Du, wo und ob  Relation 84492 (RB49: Hanau => Friedberg) in Assenheim (Oberhess) hält?
Laut OSM-Daten fährt er über das mittlere Gleis (da ist kein Bahnsteig?), hält aber am nördlichen (stop-position)
ich kenne mich da nicht aus und werde sicher nichts ändern.
happy mapping!
 Senihtu
Gino-52 (2025-10-16 15:40:52+00:00): In Assenheim wurde ein neuer Bahnsteig gebaut.
Bei der Änderung in OSM wurde die Relation vergessen.
Habe es geändert.
eggie (2025-09-21 12:14:35+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
fortera_au (2025-11-10 03:21:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 174443403 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: incompatible source
A67-A67 (2025-09-21 11:02:35+00:00): In deze wijziging worden huisnummers 29A-01, 29A-02 en 29A-03 samengevoegd op 1 adresnode. Ik heb dit hersteld.
custodiankeyy (2025-09-21 19:48:18+00:00): Are you sure about buildings that you have mapped(building=house) are fitting the description of 'A single dwelling unit usually inhabited by one family.'? If you are not sure about the type of building you can use building=yes tag combination.

For building types and information, you can check the Wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building
SomeoneElse (2025-09-24 22:32:25+00:00): There's a bug in iD that can encourage you to add ways to superrelations (here https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5487294) rather than the local relation (here https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5487293).
The other issue from https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172178406 is still a problem of course - clearly https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_foot&route=51.512009%2C-3.237576%3B51.512273%2C-3.237295#map=19/51.512475/-3.236980 is not a valid set of walking directions.
Best Regards,
Andy
aTarom (2025-09-21 13:29:51+00:00): Hola, me puedes confirmar que se tratan de nombres oficiales del pueblo todos ellos?