piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
dbergv (2025-11-24 01:15:14+00:00): This was an activity we did as a group of about a dozen people to gamify making contributions to OSM! Teams would score points by traveling around the city and making OSM contributions, and the team with the most contributions in a given neighborhood would "control" it. The goal of the game was to control as many neighborhoods as possible within the span of the game.
Glassman (2025-11-24 01:20:43+00:00): That is interesting. We just had a short discussion on Slack about it. What I find interesting is that people are using different tools to contribute. Everydoor is the most common, then Streetcomplete and one person even used GoMap!!
NeisBot (2025-11-22 23:36:22+00:00): Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Removed polling station details, updated commercial building attributes"
NeisBot (2025-11-22 23:36:22+00:00): Hi punkfairie, welcome to the OSM projekt and thanks for your contribution!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment #NoComment
NorthCrab_upload (2025-11-22 23:00:55+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13325105918
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/310789062

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
trigpoint (2026-04-14 18:20:08+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/181336246
zuicz (2025-11-28 22:32:48+00:00): Czemu inauguracyjny?
RafaBoski (2025-11-28 22:36:31+00:00): Taką mu nadali nazwę. Pociąg z Częstochowy do Krakowa nazywa się Biegański, Chrobry i Spisak, są też Czantoria, itd., a tego KŚ nazwały Inauguracyjny
zuicz (2025-11-30 12:06:13+00:00): Nigdzie w rozkładzie takiej informacji nie ma
RafaBoski (2025-12-03 21:47:02+00:00): Miałeś rację :P
Roydon Olive (2025-11-23 13:42:11+00:00): It's only temporarily closed for changes. We need some sort of tag for temporary closure, and/or a tag that reminds us to check back in 6 months or a year when it should be re-opened.
cuzi (2025-11-23 18:15:24+00:00): I guess `opening_hours=closed "temporary closed for renovation"` would work for temporary closure. If we actually know the expected time span, then it could also be added to opening_hours e.g. `08:00-23:00; 2025 Nov 15-2026 May 15 closed "temporary closed for renovation"`


https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/NotesReminderBot/ can remind us, I commented it on the note: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5032992
LateNightTone (2025-11-23 15:52:00+00:00): Hi kevinmcg, nice work with mapping of buildings here. A tip for better results is to use the "Q" key with a building selected, to square off the hand-drawn corners.

It also helps other editors if you include a more accurate description when submitting your edits, for example "buildings in the Antrim Road area". If you have any queries, do feel free to respond on this changeset, or reach out to me by private message.
Lysathor (2025-11-23 00:46:02+00:00): this is the revert for the previous deletion
NeisBot (2025-11-23 07:14:49+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 313 potential crossings.

Problematic elements (top 3 by category):
https://osm.org/way/55819460 v15 | crossings=29
https://osm.org/way/1194047124 v1 | crossings=27
https://osm.org/way/135412554 v8 | crossings=26

Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/2844912710 v3

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=175009452
topolusitania (2025-11-23 22:34:30+00:00): Corrected
Nakaner-repair (2025-11-30 21:25:12+00:00): This changes was reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175331960
NeisBot (2025-11-23 01:36:40+00:00): Salut world_1tky3o1x, bienvenue dans le projet OSM et merci pour ta contribution !

Pour faciliter la collaboration et aider les autres à comprendre tes modifications, il est préférable d'ajouter une courte description des changements que tu as effectués. Des commentaires clairs aident la communauté à suivre ton travail et à fournir des retours plus précis. Tu peux trouver des conseils pour écrire de bons commentaires ici[1].
(Auto-translation)
---
Hi world_1tky3o1x, welcome to the OSM projekt and thanks for your contribution!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish
NeisBot (2025-11-23 01:36:43+00:00): Voici un exemple de commentaire basé sur tes modifications de carte : "Mises à jour des limites de vitesse maximales à 30 et 50"
(Auto-translation)
---
Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Updated maximum speed limits to 30 and 50"
NeisBot (2025-11-23 03:37:10+00:00): Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Updated ways with asphalt surface, website, and phone details"
NeisBot (2025-11-23 03:37:10+00:00): Hi KayleeSerenada, welcome to the OSM projekt and thanks for your contribution!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment #NoComment
pwbriggs (2025-11-24 18:09:35+00:00): Hey, thanks for all the edits you've been doing! Details like this are helpful for OpenStreetMap.

I'm writing, though, because I notice that you've been leaving empty changeset comments. Myself & other local mappers would prefer if you add even a basic changeset comment like "add house types" or "specify road surfaces" so it's easier to understand, sort, and review your changes.

But keep it up; these contributions are helpful! Thanks!
dbergv (2025-11-24 01:16:52+00:00): Not sure if I did this correctly. The restaurant had a sign in the window saying they were closing down, so I removed the entry. If there is a better way to describe closed businesses, I'd be interested in hearing about it.
ika-chan! (2025-12-17 14:25:04+00:00): Source is also Bing too.
user_5359 (2025-11-23 07:33:45+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/changeset/175015181.
pwbriggs (2025-11-24 18:03:47+00:00): Hey, I heard briefly about map battle, but still don't quite know what it is. Either way, could you please try to add a descriptive changeset comment in addition to the hashtag? That way its easier for other mappers to see why you're making changes (just a bunch of "#mapbattle" changesets in a row looks a bit suspicious for reviewers, if you know what I mean). Remember: quality over quantity!

Is there some webpage for #mapbattle? Sounds interesting!
NeisBot (2025-11-23 02:37:03+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Diş polikliniği Adana"
NeisBot (2025-11-23 02:37:03+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisBot (2025-11-23 02:37:53+00:00): Örneğin, açıklamanızın daha tarafsız ve gerçek bir versiyonu şöyle olabilir: "Diş polikliniği Adana"
---
(Auto-translation)
user_5359 (2025-11-23 07:25:17+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice the difference between a name and a description. 
If you need more information (and cannot find any examples or ask anyone else), please visit our wiki at https://wiki.osm.org.
And please do not add an object as both a building (a path) and a node in the path.
NeisBot (2025-11-23 02:58:59+00:00): Hi Titocardona94, welcome to the OSM projekt and thanks for your contribution!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish
NeisBot (2025-11-23 02:59:43+00:00): Aquí tienes un comentario de ejemplo basado en tus ediciones del mapa: "Actualizadas las características de la carretera con superficie de asfalto, nombres, número de carriles y límites de velocidad"
(Auto-translation)
---
Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Updated road attributes with asphalt surface, names, lane count, and speed limits"
NeisBot (2025-11-23 03:00:52+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisBot (2025-11-23 03:00:53+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Dentist clinic in Alanya"
NeisBot (2025-11-23 03:01:26+00:00): Örneğin, açıklamanızın daha tarafsız ve gerçeklere dayalı bir versiyonu şöyle olabilir: "Alanya'da diş kliniği"
---
(Auto-translation)
Frans S (2026-01-10 11:30:21+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
If you see a road that does not follow the underlying track, please adjust it to the current situation.
If the track runs for a long distance and is wide enough for a 4x4 vehicle, tag it as an unclassified way.
Best regards
mueschel (2025-11-25 09:21:45+00:00): Hi,
please check your tags: It's "operator", not "opeator". I already fixed a few dozen yesterday, but there are more.
riverobserver (2025-11-26 18:22:30+00:00): Hi I looked at the edit and am confident I fixed the remaining incorrect tags.
Lostmonkey (2026-03-18 08:19:15+00:00): Note the wiki description of tourism=camp_pitch : "The pitch must be located within an area tagged tourism=camp_site ". In other words, all these standalone “camp_pitch” should probably be created as “camp_site” instead.
旧加卷 (2025-11-23 06:15:36+00:00): 此为针对https://osm.org/changeset/175008104 的更改，变更集175008104的变更内容包括将 https://osm.org/relation/18500468 的标签"boundary=relation" (?)修改为"boundary=administrative"
marc__marc (2026-02-21 21:53:59+00:00): Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1453014482
what's this ?
a permanant camping for worker, under construction ?
a residential area for worker ?
Regards,
Marc
BCNorwich (2025-11-24 07:46:04+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Some of your footways are placed on top of existing highways, creating duplication that could disrupt routing. Thus, the warnings above about crossing highways.

Could you please correct these problems? Need any help, just ask.

Regards Bernard.
NeisBot (2025-11-23 05:06:35+00:00): Hola nicolepere, bienvenida al proyecto OSM y gracias por tu contribución. 
Para hacer que la colaboración sea más fácil y ayudar a los demás a entender tus ediciones, es mejor agregar una breve descripción de los cambios que hiciste. Los comentarios claros ayudan a la comunidad a seguir tu trabajo y a proporcionar una retroalimentación mejor. Puedes encontrar consejos para escribir buenos comentarios aquí[1].
(Auto-translation)
---
Hi nicolepere, welcome to the OSM projekt and thanks for your contribution!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish
NeisBot (2025-11-23 05:06:38+00:00): Aquí está un comentario de ejemplo basado en tus ediciones del mapa: "Agregué casas con varios niveles y alturas"
(Auto-translation)
---
Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added houses with various levels and heights"
Daedelus129 (2025-11-23 16:34:47+00:00): you have removed some structures that exist at this location, please revert these changes, or your changes will be reported as you did not do due dillignace before your edits  Thanks
dknelson9876 (2025-11-23 16:39:43+00:00): What structures are you referring to? The buildings that were mapped with arches that area actually just doors into the mountainside?
Daedelus129 (2025-11-23 16:42:04+00:00): those are not just doors they are actual cement strucutres.  this is a location i am very familiar with as I assisted in the renovation of this facility.  please be more vigilient when removing items from the map thanks.
Daedelus129 (2025-11-23 16:46:49+00:00): here is some interesting things you should look at https://www.hirschsecure.com/resources/blog/the-worlds-most-secure-buildings-the-granite-mountain-records-vault-in-salt-lake-city-utah
dknelson9876 (2025-11-23 17:31:49+00:00): Yes, I know what it looks like, I'm a local. I deleted them because they were drawn as if looking straight on at the entrance, when things should be mapped based on their footprint, and also because an underground entrance is not a building. Since you brought it up, I've now redrawn them with correct geometry and a correct tag in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175035158 (the wiki page for cellar_entrance notes that it also includes vaults and caverns)
Daedelus129 (2025-11-23 17:54:57+00:00): I appreciate your candor, but I also feel that your opinion and tone are rude, demeaning and disrespectful. As I have looked over a lot of your “edits” though many appear to be accurate, some, especially where items and labels are removed seems to be more based on opinions.  the way you interact with others, or remove items without contacting the 
original mapper leaves a lot to be desired.  I know you map a lot and that is commendable.
MassCartog (2025-11-24 03:01:18+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM. The feature you removed in this changeset is valid. Please don’t remove valid OSM data.

You have a new account and might not be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground. If it exists on the ground, it is valid data regardless of a feature being public or private, designated or informal/illegal/unauthorized. Even decommissioned trails should not be removed until they no longer exist. Removing features that exist is actually considered vandalism.

It's clear that these features still exist on the ground. Not being public access areas is an invalid reason to remove data from OSM. So this edit is incorrect and damaging to valid OSM data.

The correct way to handle this is to use OSM's tagging system. access=private, or access=no would be appropriate if they are closed to the public. Once this is done, services that do use OSM data will reflect that and specify their access.

Please read this for more info:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won't_delete_roads_on_private_property

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F
MassCartog (2025-11-24 03:09:04+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM. The features you removed in this changeset is valid. Please don’t remove valid OSM data.

You have a new account and might not be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground. If it exists on the ground, it is valid data regardless of a feature being public or private, designated or informal/illegal/unauthorized. Even decommissioned trails should not be removed until they no longer exist. Removing features that exist is actually considered vandalism.

It's clear that these features still exist on the ground. Not being public access areas is an invalid reason to remove data from OSM. So this edit is incorrect and damaging to valid OSM data.

The correct way to handle this is to use OSM's tagging system. access=private, or access=no would be appropriate if they are closed to the public. Once this is done, services that do use OSM data will reflect that and specify their access.

This changeset has been reverted.

Please read this for more info:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won't_delete_roads_on_private_property

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F
Hung Tran 9x0 (2025-11-23 07:14:16+00:00): phần trước nhìn nhầm ghi chú nên tôi sửa lại
Kovoschiz (2025-11-23 09:33:20+00:00): 1. Please don't delete `=footway` across buildings
2. Please don't delete shops directly, as they still represent store spaces. This makes tracking and updating more difficult. It should be changed to existing tenant, or "Vacant".
mavl (2025-11-23 07:40:51+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 167120612, 171031059, 171031520, 171034487, 171075763, 171120132, 171122970, 171124186, 171124387, 171125041, 171128889, 171129471, 171307169, 171307378, 171307728, 171308280, 171308658, 171308901, 171309544, 171309780, 171310903, 171398977, 171400394, 171401865, 171402841, 171403029, 171739590, 171739798, 171739889, 171740242, 171740760, 171766364, 171772891, 171773957, 171781287, 171782576, 171782611, 171784084, 171786889, 171787732, 171789130, 171789705, 172014984, 172016197, 172016753, 172017775, 172019225, 172104407, 172105229, 172117345, 172117776, 172118131, 172152022, 172161297, 172163614, 172164543, 172165760, 172166195, 172333909, 172707263, 172918870, 173265951, 173267486, 173273390, 173276115, 173276525, 173278651, 173302038, 173302498, 173311934, 173312197, 173316020, 173316994, 173318187, 173318203, 173541503, 173711250, 173920854, 173921145, 173928569.
SafwatHalaby (2025-11-23 13:22:01+00:00): Reverts https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174980149
Supaplex (2025-12-02 15:20:09+00:00): 東湧鄉 Tang-ín-hiong -> Tang-íng-hiong
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175015471
ieguy3 (2025-11-23 08:15:56+00:00): i am not sure if the lot north of the trailhead is under GT control. but its going to be open space/nature reserve
bartgron (2025-11-26 21:09:15+00:00): Obiekty usunięte
bartgron (2025-11-26 21:09:54+00:00): Usunięto:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175172554
bartgron (2025-11-26 21:10:44+00:00): Usunięto:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175172574
bartgron (2025-11-26 21:11:23+00:00): Usunięto:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175172592
bartgron (2025-11-26 21:12:23+00:00): Usunięto:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175172629
SD Mapman (2026-01-16 19:37:22+00:00): Why are the name fields getting removed?
lankapuhelin (2026-06-06 13:19:52+00:00): Heads up, map note related to your changeset here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5318357
Dokgurte (2025-11-23 09:13:05+00:00): The data was added based on the knowledge of the area
Drafer ® (2025-11-23 09:41:56+00:00): Parking kod bazena.

Radno vreme bazena: od 10h do 19h 
Radi leti samo pošto su otvoreni bazeni
lenny32 (2025-11-26 18:05:53+00:00): Vous avez fait une coquille, il n'y a pas une voie cyclable de chaque côté de la rue, mais elle est uniquement du côté droit : cycleway=separate ou cycleway:right=separate serait plus approprié
Cla6 (2026-01-11 20:16:53+00:00): Pardon, je pensais que la question concernait chaque sens de circulation à vélo, et comme la piste cyclable séparée est bidirectionnelle, je réponds que pour les deux sens (both), la piste est séparée. C'est comme cela que je comprends l'explication du "both" sur le wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway:both) et c'est comme cela que j'ai toujours compris la question dans StreetComplete, mais je ne suis pas du tout sure.
NeisBot (2025-11-23 09:12:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisBot (2025-11-23 09:12:43+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "HVAC services in Hamilton"
Taksine (2026-03-14 11:47:44+00:00): 你在进行破坏行为，OSM这个项目让人感到绝望。
asouldiana (2026-03-14 17:56:36+00:00): 这是毫无根据的指责 我的编辑真实反映了我家乡最新的变化和长期存在的地标
osm-club (2025-12-10 05:23:11+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:old_name#Date_ranges

"When only ranges of years are specified (no month or other details), a single hyphen may be used, such as `old_name:1953-1990 = Ernst-Thälmann-Straße`.

When full dates are specified or the simple notation is not sufficient, a double hyphen ('--') can separate the from and to date - e.g. `amenity:1965--1971-12-18 = school`."

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175742444
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-24 08:05:12+00:00): re https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5049085

> Sorry, you are right: I only looked after the inputs at "Felder" and did not pull down "Eigenschaften". IMO, software should exclude such contradictions.

https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/issues/205 would be likely first step to even show this info at all
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-01-27 20:27:00+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13325774789/history has railway = waste_disposal that was added in this edit
Would amenity=waste_disposal access=private fit here well?
❤️‍🔥 (2026-01-28 00:13:59+00:00): no, the railway community prefers to use duplicate tags for some reason.......... see https://taginfo.osm.org/tags/railway=waste_disposal#projects , some apps only support  railway=waste_disposal and not amenity=waste_disposal
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-06-09 17:12:05+00:00): that should not block also adding normal tag, right?

unless it is not garbage dumpster
❤️‍🔥 (2026-06-16 11:17:58+00:00): actually, the tags have two different meanings, it's an annoying naming clash. 

waste_disposal = a dumpster, when used with amenity=*

waste_disposal = a poo disposal pipe, when used with railway=*

anyway, i double-tagged it as amenity=sanitary_dump_station
Drafer ® (2025-11-23 09:39:45+00:00):  PerSu marketi
Kralja Aleksandra 63
023/812-551 · 064/824-8181

Bosanska 89
023/812-563 · 064/840-2306

Radno vreme: 6:30-21:30h, nedeljom: 7:00-20h
IvanChan2000 (2025-11-23 13:10:03+00:00): Those exit exist though, there is no such footway across Fitfort. Also, these exits are in different levels.
Kovoschiz (2025-11-24 16:13:40+00:00): No, these are rough works needed for routing. You should detail the internal layout, not delete it entirely.
フーヴァー　リー (2025-12-02 07:34:51+00:00): 30.83139/120.93265
嘉善県 need some fixes of the name:ja and name:ja_kana keys.
市川ゆり子 (2025-12-02 11:48:29+00:00): relation:4590587 or node:855287547? what's the problem? it looks like correct...
SafwatHalaby (2025-11-23 13:33:25+00:00): The validity of this kind of usage of "link" is being discussed here: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/tagging-a-traversable-area/138357 

I may change it in the future