piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
micheleOSM3 (2026-03-25 05:38:24+00:00): Maybe it's best if I restore the situation to the correct one and then you calmly redo the changes.
EmanueleAby (2026-03-25 06:22:53+00:00): yeah, sorry for the damage I caused
micheleOSM3 (2026-03-25 10:16:32+00:00): Ok, I've reverted  your changes, now you can redo your changes.
NeisBot (2026-03-23 10:36:48+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13671396684 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Academy building"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-31 16:33:07+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180682559
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
amosharper (2026-03-23 10:36:00+00:00): Missed some source tags on this: source=streetlevel imagery;streetside;aerial imagery;OS OpenData StreetView;Public Rights of Way Layer;Strava Heat Maps;local knowledge;Cadastral Parcels
silversurfer83 (2026-03-23 19:59:19+00:00): HI :)

das LAGIS nennt diese Ruine "Wallburg Eberschützer Klippen". Wäre dies nicht der korrekte Wert für name=* ?

Grüße
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180297639
sillywalks (2026-03-24 06:38:39+00:00): Vor Ort empfand ich die Anlage eher als Ringwall. Vielleicht weiß ein ortskundiger besser Bescheid, welcher Name gebräuchlicher ist, in der Literatur hatte ich "Der Ringwall auf der Eberschützer Klippe" von Rolf Gensen gefunden und auch den Begriff "Schanze". Bist du aus der Gegend und kannst nac h einer Informationstafel forschen?
silversurfer83 (2026-03-24 20:59:35+00:00): In der Gegend bin ich nur virtuell. Liegt am Rand meiner Beobachtungszone.

"Ringwall" klingt sehr nach beschreibendem Namen, was gegen name is the name only verstößt. Wenn du vor Ort keine Tafeln gefunden hast, dann würde ich entweder den Namen aus dem LAGIS nehmen oder gar keinen name=* setzen.

cheers
sillywalks (2026-03-25 06:41:04+00:00): Ich habe den Namen berichtigt. Vielen Dank für den Hinweis.
acubens71 (2026-03-23 23:39:37+00:00): Bonjour,
Il ne faut pas supprimer les chemins existants, même privés. Il faut les cartographier de manière adéquate, en l'occurrence an ajoutant que l'accès est privé (en termes Openstreetmap, ajouter un tag "access=private")

Cordialement,
eggie (2026-03-23 11:42:21+00:00): Dag Lars,

We gebruiken niet name in MTB routes. Alleen officiële straatnamen.
Een routenaam hoort opgenomen te worden in de relatie van de MTB route.
Voorlopig name= aangepast naar description.
Zo'n bypass is lastig op te nemen in de  routerelatie. Op de relatie zelf staat name=MTB-route Zwolle

MVG
eggie

MVG
eggie
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-24 06:38:20+00:00): @whitepanda Thanks for fixing the mentioned issue and for commenting.

Would it be possible to add a direct link to the changeset instead of only the raw changeset ID? Something like https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180297803 would be very helpful.

Thanks!
eggie (2026-03-23 11:33:51+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  Je info heb ik samengevoegd met de al bestaande adresnode.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Barrel42 (2026-03-23 16:39:44+00:00): Dank je Eggie,
Ik stuur je een PB.
MappingMore (2026-03-28 09:07:51+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:180533518
FroschForscher (2026-03-24 16:41:31+00:00): Hallo tcsandramora
Dauerhaft geschlossen ... und abgerissen? Oder steht das Gebäude noch?

FroschForscher
tcsandramora (2026-03-25 15:11:50+00:00): Hallo FroschForscher

Das kann ich Ihnen leider nicht beantworten.

Beste Grüße
Wise_Turtle (2026-03-23 11:33:04+00:00): Откат правки https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178537565#map=14/53.25076/50.46162&layers=N
NeisBot (2026-03-23 10:51:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 14 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/355707165 v4 | 5 crossings
https://osm.org/way/267610485 v2 | 3 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1274361724 v1 | 3 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/11832599730 v2
https://osm.org/node/2730562671 v6

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180298206
World_Winner (2026-03-24 06:15:47+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: 180336282
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-24 06:36:55+00:00): @World_Winner Thanks for fixing the mentioned issue and for commenting here.

Would it be possible to add a direct link to the changeset instead of only the raw changeset ID? Something like https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180334338 would be very helpful.

Thanks!
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-24 06:37:49+00:00): @World_Winner Thanks for fixing the mentioned issue and for commenting.

Would it be possible to add a direct link to the changeset instead of only the raw changeset ID? Something like changeset/180336282 would be very helpful.

Thanks!
MappingMore (2026-03-29 03:13:57+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:180565259
iandees (2026-03-23 12:34:56+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8508628727 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180303604, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
arjunaraoc (2026-03-26 01:28:42+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check my update https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180432901#map=16/16.51115/80.70059
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180298471
chnuessli (2026-03-23 12:09:29+00:00): Could this be the same as: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9036239617
World_Winner (2026-03-24 10:32:30+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: 180346218
Wildsharky (2026-03-25 10:23:43+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:180345263
arjunaraoc (2026-03-26 01:26:39+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check my update https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180432868
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180298826
arjunaraoc (2026-03-26 01:17:47+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check my update https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180432791
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180299248
arjunaraoc (2026-03-26 01:16:38+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check my update https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180432777
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180299360
NeisBot (2026-03-23 11:16:19+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/6896165554 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Event hall"
---
Par exemple, une version plus neutre et factuelle de ton texte pourrait être : « Salle d'événement »
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-03-31 16:33:10+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/180300592
iandees (2026-03-23 12:35:05+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12696078481 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180303611, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
arjunaraoc (2026-03-26 01:09:13+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180299747
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-23 11:58:21+00:00): @rajdhani Thanks for fixing the mentioned issue and for commenting.

Would it be possible to add a direct link to the changeset instead of only the raw changeset ID? Something like https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180299771 would be very helpful.

Thanks!
GilB (2026-04-04 14:21:06+00:00): Bonjour
Encore une fois de plus, un ajout inutile et erroné. Le commerce existe déjà depuis 2022 au n°3. Vous avez créé un doublon au mauvais endroit avec des informations incomplètes. A quoi cela sert-il ?
J'ai supprimé le POI en trop. Un signalement va également être fait sur le forum Osm-fr. Ces contributions de mauvaise qualité détériorent la qualité des données et ajoute une charge aux contributeurs trices de terrain.
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2026-04-07 06:40:37+00:00): Bonjour, effectivement, nous avons ajouté un commerce du réseau Espaces Atypiques aux mauvais endroit. Désolé. Bonne journée
GilB (2026-04-07 17:15:49+00:00): Bonjour
Je suis heureux que vous reconnaissiez votre erreur. Mais cela ne va plus suffire. Faire des erreurs, ça arrive à tout le monde. En faire régulièrement, avec insistance, sans se préoccuper de l'existant est un problème (et dans ce cas non seulement c'était au mauvais endroit mais c'était aussi un doublon inutile). On s'approche du vandalisme à des fins commerciales. Il y a un problème dans vos process et avec la formation ou le temps alloué aux personnes qui effectuent les contributions. Cela n'est pas au niveau de cet outil et génère du travail supplémentaire pour les autres contributeurs trices.
J'ai effectué, comme d'autres, le signalement au DWG comme indiqué dans le fil de discussion sur le forum Osm-Fr. Ce sont eux qui évalueront la situation.
pwbriggs (2026-03-23 19:04:59+00:00): Already mapped at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4428162203. Thanks!
CAM-Gerlach (2026-05-01 01:03:34+00:00): (It's a SEO spam account, just FYI)
pwbriggs (2026-05-01 04:19:10+00:00): Yeah I still treat them with respect, I just don't offer as much care or advice as I would a new contributor. I'm well acquainted with SEO editors :)
CAM-Gerlach (2026-05-01 16:23:55+00:00): Fair enough. Personally, unlike any human user where I'd assume good faith (or even a business owner trying to add their own business to the map), I treat these throwaway accounts of a known SEO spam ring with every bit as much respect as they treat both the OSM community and their customers ;)
eggie (2026-03-23 12:54:38+00:00): Dit is de huidige situatie
https://viewer.satellietdataportaal.nl/@52.33909,5.135899,18/?datastrip=20260302_SVNEO-03&sensorname=SuperView-NEO

Of de fietspaden nu goed liggen is nog wel de vraag. De fietsrouterelaties heb ik weer verbonden met het knooppunt. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-03-23 12:56:27+00:00): https://knooppuntnet.nl/en/analysis/changes?strategy=location&pageSize=25&pageIndex=0&impact=true
MTijn (2026-03-23 16:43:11+00:00): Het is zoals het er nu bij ligt, maar ze gaan het hele fietspad naast de haven nog aanpakken en in een duinlandschap toveren. 
Misschien dat het dan wat logischer in elkaar gaat steken.
eggie (2026-03-23 16:45:25+00:00): Voor nu is het oke. De wereld verandert doorlopend en osm dus ook. 😀
Fjana (2026-03-25 13:19:26+00:00): This is a test edit preceding other mass edits; see osm.wiki/Mechanical_Edits/Fjana/add_border_type_to_boundaries_in_Czechia
whitepanda (2026-03-24 05:12:23+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: 180334594
aq123 (2026-04-02 18:37:15+00:00): This aerial way was already tagged with abandoned:aerialway=cable_car. And I think it's more suitable than aerialway=cable_car you've added, because the way is not functioning and really abandoned
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180301731
LudovicG (2026-04-06 17:08:59+00:00): Bonjour,
Concernant la post_box A0R4D5, j'avais détecté un écart avec l'opendata de La Poste (mais vous avez été plus rapide que moi pour venir sur le terrain :) ).
En effet, pas de ref A0R4D5 sur https://datanova.laposte.fr/datasets/laposte-boiterue et la ref indiquée par dataNOVA devrait être A0R1M1.
Lors de votre arpentage, avez-vous vérifié la ref ? (ou avez-vous la possibilité de revoir sur place ?)
ademarcy (2026-04-06 19:30:18+00:00): Bonjour,
Je n'ai pas pensé à vérifier la réf de la boîte vu que StreetComplete ne me l'a pas explicitement demandé, j'essaierai de vérifier sur place dans la semaine si j'ai l'occasion de passer devant :)
ademarcy (2026-04-07 10:12:21+00:00): Vérifié sur place aujourd'hui, la réf de la boîte est A0R1M1
LudovicG (2026-04-21 11:42:56+00:00): merci beaucoup, je viens de modifier la ref sur le node :)
Wildsharky (2026-03-25 10:21:45+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:180335572
MappingMore (2026-03-28 06:18:09+00:00): Partially Revert of 180238382
Sylabowy Kot (2026-03-23 16:14:19+00:00): Błędne tagowanie, bo drogi się renderują.
Powinno być proposed:highway=service.
Dobrze by było co to za "wiedza". Jeśli lokalna, to spoko.
iandees (2026-03-23 12:35:13+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4089724890 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180303616, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
NeisBot (2026-03-23 12:18:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 8 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1491826158 v1 | 5 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1491826159 v1 | 3 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/6047569179 v3
https://osm.org/node/7992059121 v2
https://osm.org/node/7992059117 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180302715
Timmy_Tesseract (2026-03-26 06:41:37+00:00): Reverted in changeset/180381564
MappingMore (2026-03-29 03:53:26+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:180565781
eggie (2026-03-23 12:28:17+00:00): Dag MTijn. Hier zijn nu wel de fietsrouterelaties stuk.
Ik kijk even of het simpel te herstellen is.
Routerelaties kun je niet bewerken met eeditor iD.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-03-23 12:41:17+00:00): Drie onderbroken fietsroutes hersteld
eggie (2026-03-23 12:45:52+00:00): Wanneer je fiets - of wandelroutes tegenkomt svp niet onderbreken. Vraada niemand op het forum om te assisteren.
We moeten echt de routerelaties in orde houden.
Waar paden zonder verbindingsnode elkaar kruisten heb ik het ook gerepareerd. Het lijkt dan wel goed, maar het zit niet aan elkaar . Zie foutmelding.
MTijn (2026-03-23 16:39:32+00:00): Check, zal ik doen volgende keer
eggie (2026-03-23 16:42:45+00:00): 👍
NeisBot (2026-03-23 12:26:14+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your changesets and noticed that the cumulative count of your recent edits (2 changesets) shows that 594 of your last 703 changes were deletions. This is quite an unusual proportion, so I wanted to check with you.

Could you please confirm whether these deletions were intentional or if they may have occurred by mistake?

#DeletionsCheck #Cumulative
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?uid=22691826
evgenykatyshev (2026-03-23 12:20:40+00:00): * 521 actually
george1201 (2026-03-24 21:56:44+00:00): Hallo panamanap,
schön dass du mithilfst die Daten für OSM zu verbessern. Einen Website-Link  hinzuzufügen, ist eine gute Idee. Leider sind hier an dieser Stelle zwei unterschiedliche Objekte miteinander "verklebt": Zum einen die Fläche des Wertstoffhofs https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/96652983. Zum anderen die Linie des umschließenden Zauns https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1059073579. Eine Linie sollte man aber nicht auf die Umrandung einer Fläche setzen. Man kann die beiden Objekte dann sehr schlecht auseinanderhalten. Und diesen Fehler habe ich hier vor fast 4 Jahren gemacht. Folge davon ist jetzt, dass du die URL an den Zaun w1059073579 gehängt hast, und nicht an die Wertstoffstation w96652983, wo sie besser hingehört.
Ich hab's mir jetzt auf meine TODO-Liste geschrieben, dass ich den Zaun von der Fläche abtrenne. Danach sollte es klarer sein, wo der Link zur Website hingehört.
george1201 (2026-03-25 22:46:52+00:00): So, ich habe jetzt mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180430257 die "Verklebung" der Zäune mit den Flächenobjekten korrigiert. Die URL an das richtige Objekt hin verschoben, also vom Zaun zum Wertstoffhof.
panamanap (2026-03-27 08:12:24+00:00): Hallo george, danke für die Erklärung und Korrektur. Die Unterscheidung war für mich in Organic Maps nicht wirklich sichtbar, ich habe es eben zum "Wertstoffhof" hinzugefügt.
FroschForscher (2026-03-24 16:44:04+00:00): Hallo Kellypropelli willkommen bei OSM,
schau dir doch mal den Wiki Artikel zu Öffnungszeiten an: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours

FroschForscher
SomeoneElse (2026-03-27 14:07:17+00:00): C'mon, "Removed duplicating FHRS as perpetrator was too lazy to do it themselves" so not going to win any friends or influence people that your way of doing things is correct.
DaveF (2026-03-27 14:44:45+00:00): <Gallic shrug>

I don't wish to "make friends" I want to improve the quality of the OSM database.

Someone who's been mapping since '07 should know they should be correcting their own errors.

Given the comments, I'm concerned about the quality of data in Scotland.
sfromis (2026-04-05 21:50:21+00:00): Jeg mener ikke at det er korrekt at masserette fra "culvert" til "pipeline".

Som jeg forstår det er "culvert" underjordiske rør hvor vand flyder af egen kraft, typisk under veje eller jernbaner.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tunnel%3Dculvert

Og "pipeline" er i stedet hvor der bliver pumpet en væske eller gas fordi den skal transporters til en modtager, det mest udbredte er drikkevand fra vores vandværker.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dpipeline

På Sydfalster (omkring Gedesby) lagde jeg mærke til en række mystiske "pipeline", på en måde som slet ikke passer med hvor vandværket pumper drikkevand, selv om disse "pipelines" var markeret som drikkevand.

Uden at kunne verificere, forekommer det mig plausibelt at linjerne repræsenterer underjordiske dræn for at holde markerne egnede til dyrkning. Måske skulle de markeres som "drain", men jeg er ikke særlig sikker på nuancerne her.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Ddrain

Til gengæld er jeg sikker på at det ikke bare ligner hvad vandværket har af rør under jorden, som set på https://sydfalstervandgis.vandnet.dk/
osmviborg (2026-04-06 06:07:48+00:00): Nar jeg læser  definitionen på culvert så passer det ikke på disse meget lange rørlagte vandløb. Der mangler et tag til den slags. Det bedste jeg kunne finde var pipeline, måske skulle substance=water være rainwater i stedet for water. Du er velkommen til at ændre det til noget andet hvis du vil.
sfromis (2026-04-06 08:24:43+00:00): Som jeg forstår "rørlagte vandløb" er det når et naturligt vandløb bliver lukket inde i et rør, når vi ønsker at have et byområde uden forstyrrelse fra naturlige linjer. Det er altså meget forskelligt fra dræning af lavtliggende land.

Min pointe var at "pipeline" er direkte misvisende (det er sgu ikke drikkevand), og selv om det var at strække definitionen af "culvert", var dette tættere på at beskrive virkeligheden.

Jeg har allerede peget på https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Ddrain som en  plausibel tagging, selv om dette tag ikke synes at være tænkt som underjordiske dræn.

Nederst på siden indikerer "Possible tagging mistakes" at "waterway=underground_drain" er forkert, men uden at foreslå noget andet end waterway=drain. Så jeg ser stadig ikke noget bedre end dette, som alternativ til culvert, og klart mere rigtigt en pipeline.

Mine OSM aktiviteter er bevidst begrænset til at rette enkelte detaljer, og ikke at tage fat på mere overordnede projekter som at rette op på misvisende masserettelser.
osmviborg (2026-04-06 08:37:14+00:00): Rettet til
waterway=drain
location=underground
osmviborg (2026-04-06 08:40:02+00:00): Endnu bedre ville det være ikke at tegne stiplede linier fra skærmkortet ind i OSM, for det er det det ser her.
Fjana (2026-03-25 11:45:00+00:00): See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edits/Fjana/add_border_type_to_boundaries_in_Czechia
World_Winner (2026-03-24 04:14:37+00:00): Revert of 180270683
kubahahaha (2026-07-14 17:56:40+00:00): Ten wiadukt naprawdę jest jednokierunkowy?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5395879
szalona_entropia (2026-07-15 09:38:30+00:00): Tak, a fragment na wschód nie został otwarty.
Fjana (2026-03-25 11:44:56+00:00): See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edits/Fjana/add_border_type_to_boundaries_in_Czechia
WoesteHugo (2026-03-23 14:25:01+00:00): Goede verbetering. Als we dan toch nog bezig zijn: Zou `opening_date`  hier niet ` 	motor_vehicle:conditional=no @ (2026 March 5-2028 Dec 1)` moeten zijn. Nu zou het betekenen dat de road niet open is tot 2028, wat niet het geval is. Ben ook voorstander om opening_date evt helemaal weg te halen.
jonrellim (2026-03-24 11:30:04+00:00): Ja, lijkt me idd beter om dat ook weg te halen.
S-zation (2026-04-19 08:07:15+00:00): Thank you for this adding this to the map! You are correct - the gray & black cameras are ALPRs. I've added some manufacturer and direction tags.