piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2024-12-17 20:12:52+00:00): Ahh... Dat zie zie je steeds meer. 
'Houd rekening met elkaar'.staat er dan soms. 
Wanneer er geen bord staat dan gebruiken we highway=path
surface=?
en dan
foot=yes en bicycle=yes voor de duidelijkheid. 

Dus bij G7 bord footway
Bij G11, 12a en 13  cycleway..
Geen bebording dan highway=path.

Mapse
eggie
maddinjunze (2025-03-18 08:10:46+00:00): Hi, woher stammt die Info, dass die Wurzener Landstraße 34 nicht mehr da ist?

Laut WebAtlasSN/Geoportal Sachsen (https://geoviewer.sachsen.de/mapviewer/index.html?map=d9f91cd3-26cc-4002-966c-ac30975d66fa) befindet sich die Hausnummer weiterhin dort bei dem Einfamilienhaus und nicht bei dem Pferdestall.
Darüber hinaus scheint die Wurzener Landstraße auch weiter nach Süden zu gehen, bei OSM steht da "An der Dobritzmark".

LG Martin
letihu (2025-03-22 21:11:46+00:00): Hallo Martin,
dann muß wohl mal jemand nachschauen.
Der Pferdestall hat dann eine falsche Adresse?
https://www.facebook.com/p/Pferdepension-Sambleben-100027842126351/?locale=de_DE
BrummsLee (2026-01-06 16:50:15+00:00): Hallo!
Sorry, warum löscht man dann aber die Adresse am Wohnhaus?
So wie es aussieht, weiß die Betreiberin des Pferdestalls selbst nicht, welche Adresse sie hat.
https://www.stallbewertung.de/pferdepension-sambleben
https://sv-frischauf.de/seiten/pferd1.html
Haben Pferdeställe eigentlich eine eigene postalische Adresse?
Vielleicht ist die Nummer 34 auch das Wohnhaus der Anbieterin des Pferdestalls?
Hab die Adresse jetzt mal wieder am Wohnhaus ergänzt.
Reinhard12 (2025-10-04 20:17:11+00:00): Hallo flo,
was bedeutet "surf=as", das bei vielen dieser Wege hinzugefügt wurde?
Gruß Reinhard
flohoff (2025-10-06 18:20:34+00:00): Lach - das ist ein "autovervollständigungs nicht ausgeführt thema" - Da hat josm wohl meine tastatureingaben nicht genommen ..

Das müsste vermutlich surface=asphalt sein
Glassman (2024-12-18 16:14:04+00:00): classifying the canal road as a primary seems like a stretch. At best it is highway=service. The county doesn't even have it on it's basemaps. See https://matterhornwab.co.pierce.wa.us/publicgis/

Can you please correct?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160318802
Glassman (2024-12-21 01:26:03+00:00): Since you didn't fix it, I have changed it to a service road that it appears to be. Let me know if you have any questions.
MapSpot (2024-12-17 20:04:51+00:00): Hi Socks,

I notice you used the tag private=yes to designate roadways as private.

I would strongly advise using access=private, which is the standard tag compatible with most routers and map display platforms.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-02-14 23:03:04+00:00): Please don't add fake names
lessiopi (2024-12-19 06:12:42+00:00): Thanks for adding all these. I had no idea ALRPs were so prevalent in Salinas. Now that I know what they look like, I'm noticing them everywhere. Just today I passed by someone working on (insalling?) one on San Jan Grade Road, which is now mapped.
thedrainnoodle (2024-12-19 06:16:57+00:00): Thanks! These are just the ones I know of, I'm sure there are more. The only town I am sure I found 100% is Seaside. I'm sure there are more in Salinas, PG, and Marina, and they just installed them in Monterey. I haven't mapped any in Monterey yet.
eggie (2024-12-29 21:05:14+00:00): Dag Hein  Goed om de Hooglaarsestraat actueel te maken. Het was lang wachten op deze brug.
Er staan wel erg veel accesstags op.
Het komt uit op een fietspad. 
Weet jij welk bebording er vooraan staat? 
Zouden die wegen nog allemaal maxspeed 80 hebben?

Ik heb de brug wat zuidelijker gelegd. Alles is al ingemeten in de BGT omtrekgericht.




MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-12-29 21:28:03+00:00): Fietsbrug Slomperd verbindt Breda met Etten-Leur
https://etten-leur.nieuws.nl/gemeente/fietsbrug-slomperd-verbindt-breda-met-etten-leur
Ben benieuwd of het niet een fietspad is?
eggie (2025-03-09 16:35:10+00:00): Dag hein,

Ik heb het traject na survey aangepast naar een G13 fietspad.
Tot het paaltje is bestemmingsverkeer toegestaan op het fietspad. 
accesstags die niet van toepassing waren heb ik verwijderd zoals vehicle=no maxspeed 80 e.d. 
Het is een regulier G13 fietspad. 

MVG
eggie
HeinIII (2025-03-12 08:09:43+00:00): Ha, mooi! Weer iets opgeruimd.
clay_c (2024-12-17 20:14:37+00:00): forgot to specify, source=survey
filhon1828 (2024-12-20 17:49:20+00:00): This is no official name, but the result of an imposture in 2024. This summit is named Crêt de la Neige on the Carte de l'état-major and was measured by Filhon as the highest point of the Jura mountain range in 1828. Its name moved to the antecime after the erection of a signal in 1907. The whole ridge between the two summits should be named Crêt de la Neige.
steakfrites (2024-12-20 18:57:23+00:00): The changeset is based on this new measurement
https://www.24heures.ch/surprise-un-pic-inconnu-devient-le-nouveau-toit-du-jura-684732973909
A team of geographs from the University of Lausanne lead by György Hetényi measured the new highest point of Jura with satellites in 2024 and called J1. It's 2.75m higher than Crêt de la Neige.
Whether the Swiss "Office de la topographie" will record it as a separate peak is yet to be known.
I thought it was a good idea to have it on the map, because plenty of people will go there following the article.
I'm no expert.
filhon1828 (2024-12-20 21:56:55+00:00): But this point was already on the map!!
Go to https://www.geoportail.gouv.fr/carte with layer carte topographique IGN and search for Crêt de la Neige, 01410 Lélex. The top of Jura is the point 1720 to the ENE of Crêt de la Neige 1718. And this point has been known with the correct altitude since 1828. The "discovery" of september 2024 is a fake.
steakfrites (2024-12-21 06:56:09+00:00): OK. I just sent an email to Swisstopo to ask if the Swiss plan to add the name separately.
As the peak is on the French territory, I guess only IGN is the authority in this case.
I'll add their answer when I receive it.
filhon1828 (2024-12-21 09:35:08+00:00): Your guess is correct.
Go to https://www.geoportail.gouv.fr/carte with layer Carte de l'état-major, put your finger on Crêt de la Neige 1723 m (corresponds today to 1720 m as the altitude of Pierre du Niton is now 3.04 meters lower than in 1828) and change then to the layer carte topographique IGN: your finger is now on the point 1720. J1 is a fake discovery of this known point.
Look at
https://www.letemps.ch/sciences/le-pic-anonyme-devenu-toit-du-massif-du-jura-n-est-pas-si-anonyme-que-cela
for the correct story. By adding the name J1, you perpetuate the fake.
steakfrites (2024-12-21 15:20:51+00:00): I agree with you and I discovered the article in Le Temps today as well.
Apparently, even the scientists from Unil are not planning to make it an official peak.
Did you remove the name I added or do I have to do it myself?
filhon1828 (2024-12-21 15:46:45+00:00): I removed it in v6. In the first version, before my intervention, the point was not even in the right place, since it was secret. In September, all French and Swiss medias were keen to report about the  pretended discovery. Le Temps was then the only media that accepted to publish the true story and to restore historical truth.
filhon1828 (2024-12-24 09:37:07+00:00): https://www.rts.ch/info/monde/2024/article/le-mysterieux-sommet-du-jura-une-redecouverte-plutot-qu-une-nouveaute-28731329.html

Même la RTS renie son message d'origine !
steakfrites (2024-12-24 09:44:33+00:00): If they mention it so clearly, it won't remain secret for long...
Aim311_ (2025-01-16 20:07:21+00:00): Jak masz możliwości i chęci możesz pododawać przydrożne kapliczki i krzyże w okolicy Gostynia.
W Gostyniu jest znane sanktuarium, a okolicznych wioskach setki niezmapowanych obiektów sakralnych.
CurlingMan13 (2024-12-26 00:11:29+00:00): Changeset reviewed.  Good edit.  Square buildings, good alignment to aerial imagery.  Keep up the awesome work.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160320507
Baloo Uriza (2024-12-18 13:17:05+00:00): The q button in id will square right angles for you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160320604
Baloo Uriza (2024-12-18 13:17:28+00:00): The q button in id will square right angles for you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160320604
eggie (2024-12-17 21:11:47+00:00): Reverted by changeset Wijzigingenset #160322194

Ik heb je aanpassing opnieuw teruggedraaid.  

Svp niets aan de BAG data veranderen. Alles is ingemeten geïmporteerd vanuit de BAG/ Kadaster.
Wanneer je denk dat iets niet klopt kun je een terugmelding doen richting de BAG.
Dat kan hier
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/?searchQuery=S+Blaupot+ten+Catestr+108&objectId=0479200000121825&theme=BRT+Achtergrond&geometry.x=116543.54000000001&geometry.y=496513.76800000004&zoomlevel=15

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-12-17 21:23:55+00:00): Tip.. Kijk nooit naar de daken bij schuin genomen luchtfoto's Dat is niet waar het gebouw staat.
Groet
eggie
eggie (2024-12-17 21:15:46+00:00): Dag Tomas... Wanneer dat rijtje inmiddels gesloopt is kan het uiteraard weg.
In november stonden de woningen er nog.
https://viewer.satellietdataportaal.nl/@51.97770,5.948657,18/?datastrip=20241104_PNEO-03

MVG
eggie
Tomas09 (2024-12-17 21:29:31+00:00): Het staat op satalliet er nog wel maar in het echt is het al een tijdje allemaal weg en is het niet de bedoeling om zo recent en exacte informatie hier op te doen? (niet de bedoeling als het passief aggresief overkomt)
eggie (2024-12-17 21:33:35+00:00): Dag Tomas,

Het lijkt me correct dan. Hoe actueler hoe beter.

MVG
eggie
Szymson (2024-12-18 19:29:40+00:00): Tu nie ma Biedronki, co to za bzdury
Szymson (2024-12-18 19:31:03+00:00): Tu jest: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1342235027
streckenkundler (2024-12-17 21:15:59+00:00): Hei,

nun, ich stecke in diesem Thema nicht wirklich drin, aber schreibe mal deine Frage ins Forum... https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/de/56 Da sind viele wissende Köpfe...

Grüße,

Sven
AndyB_66 (2024-12-18 08:44:52+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Metzor (2024-12-19 19:59:11+00:00): Changeset bbox over 4 continents for 2 pois?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
sb9576 (2024-12-19 23:55:59+00:00): Yeah … go big or go home 😀.

You might also notice the changes are a day or two apart, and happened while the database was offline or unreachable. I don’t usually work like that.
Jakuje (2024-12-25 18:49:19+00:00): Please, provide sources for your changes. This way, it looks like an import or some AI mapping.
MaestroKissaki (2024-12-26 02:20:45+00:00): creación de polígonos, casas, viviendas, espacios habitados, todo el trabajo es realizado sin herramientas tecnológicas distintas a JOSM y mapas BING
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-23 10:16:00+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12427142624/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
kitsee (2024-12-18 17:45:43+00:00): Hi Ceirios, You may have made a row of street lamps instead of bollards here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12427193541
ceirios (2024-12-18 18:20:54+00:00): bollocks, thank you! my C is going on my keyboard so i must've copied the wrong thing!
ceirios (2024-12-18 18:22:52+00:00): Should be right now!
jmarchon (2024-12-20 04:45:50+00:00): Welcome to OSM!
Thanks for getting this info added. It looks like you've added an overlapping path - I've fixed it
Happy mapping
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:23:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:11:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:18:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
Lezurex (2024-12-18 07:59:15+00:00): Hallo stillhart,

Warum hast du nur die Grünflächen und nicht die gesamte Verkehrsinsel als traffic_island gemappt? Die Fussgänger verkehren ja *auf* der Verkehrsinsel.

LG Lezurex
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:12:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:12:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
davide84 (2025-04-09 07:12:58+00:00): Hi! Sorry for the late reply to this changeset... May I ask you what is the wiki definition? I had previously put the RFI tracks of Sardinia as "main", because otherwise in the maps Sardinia looks empty at too many zoom levels. Thanks!
astro_furball (2025-09-14 08:30:54+00:00): I presume they're judging based on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:usage%3Dmain: "a railway with higher traffic and higher speed than branch lines, often double tracked and/or electrified, may be high speed, usually longer than a branch line". I agree with davide that it's a travesty that it makes Sardinia look like a railway void at first glance. And semantically a branch railway needs a connecting main railway to branch off of. Surely the Cagliari – Golfo Aranci line at least deserves the main label: it's double-tracked from Cagliari to San Gavino, being electrified past that to Oristano on account of high enough traffic, and as the line's name indicates it officially continues even further for a total of 300 km.
davide84 (2025-09-17 07:23:16+00:00): Agree, that's why the RFI line in Sardinia is semi-officially called "backbone" :) I will restore the "main" tag on the Cagliari - Golfo Aranci line, leaving the ARST lines as branch lines.
AwFi (2025-09-17 10:05:38+00:00): I don't agree with this, too be honest. Sardinia railways were nowadays only for passengers trains with very few trains every day, this doesn't meet the main standards. We shouldn't map for the renderer and if Sardinia looks empty that's an ORM problem.
Branch in italian context is used for low traffic railways, exactly like the Sardinian ones.
AwFi (2025-09-17 10:28:20+00:00): Looking carefully the Caliari-Decimomannu can be consisted main, but the rest of the network with 1 or .5 trains/hour and no freight can't be considered main in my opinion.
davide84 (2025-09-17 12:17:17+00:00): I see the point about it definitely not being a continental corridor, but I don't agree that rendering should be ignored in a mapping effort ;-) moreover, I believe the definition is intentionally vague to allow for considering the context: "higher traffic and higher speed ... longer than a branch line ... electrified" the RFI "dorsale" fulfills that for Sardinia compared to narrow gauge lines. I believe Cagliari-Olbia as "main" and the others as "branches" describes well the network of the island.
wildmaps (2025-09-17 15:38:48+00:00): Hi davide84,
in my opinion, if you look only at Sardinia, then yes, the Cagliari–Olbia can be seen as the island’s main line. But if you compare it to the whole Italian network (or even worldwide), I wouldn’t really classify it as a true main line.

In Italy we usually try to follow RFI’s classification as a reference (with some exceptions), but it’s still difficult to decide objectively which lines should be main and which should be branch, while keeping criteria consistent on a global scale. I also haven’t yet checked how other countries have applied this classification in OSM.

Maybe it would be a good idea to refine the wiki definition, since like already specified the classification depends not only on infrastructure but also on traffic. Sardinia is a special case because it’s an island, but I don’t think it should be tagged as main just for semantic or rendering reasons.
davide84 (2025-09-17 16:00:33+00:00): I would also like to follow RFI and usually I check my other changes against ePIR, unfortunately their classification in rete fondamentale / rete complementare is a bit arbitrary and tied to their internal history and processes. A current example: Bressanone - San Candido is branch for RFI, San Candido - Lienz is main for OeBB. It does not make sense, so I think we should ask ourselves, what do we want to really represent in the map, because plainly reflecting the internal classifications of the different owners will not end well.
Shall we discuss further in the wiki page linked above? :-)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:12:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:16:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:14:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
AnaVrbica (2024-12-21 20:16:11+00:00): Reverted because of added node #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160482177
bora can (2024-12-19 18:36:45+00:00): Daha önce yapmış olduğum yanlışı düzelttiğiniz için çok teşekkür ederim.
CurlingMan13 (2024-12-26 00:06:51+00:00): looks good
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160325062
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:18:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:12:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
Glassman (2024-12-18 16:21:10+00:00): Ideally this construction landuse should be changed to leisure=playgound instead of deleting the polygon area.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160325803
eggie (2024-12-18 06:01:12+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback:  No space in postcode. I fixed it. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-12-18 06:05:55+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback   Heeft de Prins Bernhardlaan geen verbinding voor motorvoertuigen met het westelijk deel van de Antwerpsestraatweg?
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-12-18 06:15:26+00:00): Dag JBimmel,

Ik heb de verbinding voor motorvoertuigen hersteld. 
Het wordt hier niet opeens een voetgangersoversteek. Voetgangers kunnen de oversteek nemen naast de fietsoversteek.
Je kunt dus nu met de auto weer naar rechts komende vanuit de Bernhardlaan. 
Oversteken is uiteraard niet mogelijk. 
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=160326613

MVG
eggie
JBimmel (2024-12-18 07:40:55+00:00): Hoi eggie,

Bedankt voor je uitleg. Ik zie nu wat ik verkeerd gedaan had.
eggie (2024-12-18 07:48:09+00:00): Je bedoeling was in ieder geval goed en nu klopt het met de werkelijkheid. 
Mapse..
eggie
marczoutendijk (2025-08-20 18:33:53+00:00): Hi,
landuse=accommodation
can you point me to the wiki or discussion where that tag is mentioned or discussed?
I can't find any in the wiki.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:landuse

Best regards  
Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
MichaelCollinson (2025-08-21 05:20:13+00:00): Hi Marc,
Thank you for getting in touch. No, it is a user defined value by me as there is nothing that overlaps it. I find it very useful for making maps of resort / beach areas to show and demarcate the often customer-only areas of hotels. Taginfo suggests that many have been removed.

Happy mapping,
Mike
marczoutendijk (2025-08-21 09:53:54+00:00): Hi Mike,
Thanks for that information, but I have a few remarks for you:
By using the landuse=accomodation for this information you are removing other (relevant) information from that area, like you did here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1222165229/history#map=19/16.326274/122.190118
You mapped the area north of the hotels with landuse=orchard, but the area around the hotels (which are clearly inside another orchard) with your landuse=accomodation.
Now it looks as if the hotels are in some snow area!
I fixed that by bringing back the orchard, but you can improve the situation more by following this rules:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Atourism%3Dhotel#As_a_campus
The area of the hotel is clear then, and you could add the hotels (not as a node but as a building=hotel) inside that area.
When adding a new value (like accomodation) to an existing key (landuse=*) it is always strongly advised to discuss that in the various OSM groups - and in the wiki itself - so that others can give their comments and problems can be solved.

Keep mapping!
Marc.
MichaelCollinson (2025-08-23 10:17:29+00:00): Hi Marc,
No information is lost and the editting is done from on the ground survey. In the Philippine example, the imagery is very much out of date and you have tagged as "orchard" ground that has been cleared and used for accommodation by two entities, several building with no clear boundary between them and probable shared usage.
marczoutendijk (2025-08-23 11:45:54+00:00): I see that you have fixed that area by using the new information, which is a good thing.

But still I point you to the tags here:
osm.wiki/Tag%3Atourism%3Dhotel#As_a_campus
to use as a better choice for landuse=accommodation (used 12 times)
and one:
landuse=accomodation (typo)
(used here once: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31846913#map=18/11.983806/121.908745
)
which have worldwide only you as user!
And because you have not documented landuse=accommodation in the wiki, nobody understand what it stands for or how it is to be used.
But the wiki for tourism=hotel is clear and that tag is used more than 400000 times.
See also this:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:landuse
as a place to add your new value for landuse.

Keep on mapping,
Marc.
CurlingMan13 (2024-12-26 15:33:18+00:00): Good golf edit!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160327226
b-jazz (2024-12-26 21:58:09+00:00): Thanks CurlingMan. It's my goal to get all of lollipops in golf courses cleaned up this year. You can read more on the OSM-US Slack server in the #golf channel if you're interested.