piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Dimitar155 (2025-11-09 19:52:42+00:00): Видях какво сме обсъждали тогава. Предполагам че идеята на това разграничение е че в соц трафопостовете може човек да влезе вътре, евентуално да обиколи съоръжението и да извърши някакъв ремонт. При този по-нов тип, не мисля че има къде да влезеш. И да влезеш, едва ли можеш да седиш изправен.

Консенсуса за таговете го има. Остава да се разберат какви полета следва да има шаблона, което видимо не е най-бързата процедура :)

Това до трафопоста е преса за картон. Предполагам че е към Джъмбо. Отгоре има и "chute" (което на френски и английски е едно и също, не се сещам как е на български).
Fraxi (2025-11-09 20:38:11+00:00): Между другото, виж снимките по-надолу от https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Utility_facilities
Dimitar155 (2025-11-09 20:47:14+00:00): Видях ги, не правят ситуацията по-ясна :)
Fraxi (2025-12-09 19:24:13+00:00): Мите, коментирам, защото днес като се занимавах с кадастъра, видях, че трафопостове като https://javier.jimenezshaw.com/mapas/?c=42.6600204,23.2749894&z=19&f=osm&b=bng-sat&v=2&e=0.5&o=100&ed=0&m=&ga=0 или https://javier.jimenezshaw.com/mapas/?c=42.6631980,23.2839373&z=19&f=osm&b=bng-sat&v=2&e=0.426&o=100&ed=0&m=&ga=0 се водят "СГРАДА за енергопроизводство"
Dimitar155 (2025-12-09 20:06:47+00:00): Покривите на бензиностанциите пък не са сгради според същия кадастър...
Fraxi (2025-12-10 07:50:57+00:00): Еми нямат 4 стени и не приличат особено на други сгради... Виж, май най-добре е за момента такъв тип трафопостове да ги тагваме с man_made=substation. В смисъла на съоръжения. Не е популярен този таг, но го има. Може би това е най-точния таг. Вчера четох за КТП...
Fraxi (2025-12-10 08:16:45+00:00): Има и вариант, популярен в Русия. transformer=КТП...
Dimitar155 (2025-12-10 08:17:29+00:00): > Еми нямат 4 стени и не приличат особено на други сгради...

Факт, но ние ги отбелязваме с building=roof (:

Може да се нарече и извъгабаритно улично шкафче. Все пак достъпа вътре в тях е доста труден.
user_5359 (2025-11-09 06:03:25+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please do not delete roads that have restricted access rights. The deleted road was correctly marked with access=private.
rahal2022 (2026-05-31 15:52:19+00:00): اكمل التفاصيل كم دور اقرب شارع
rempshaener (2025-11-09 07:41:41+00:00): Hallo,

du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Deine Anpassung ist in Ordnung, ich habe keine Anmerkungen,

Viele Grüße
Fizzie-DWG (2025-11-09 00:19:59+00:00): Are the carparks public (for anybody to use) or private (restricted to residents & guests)? Please add an access= tag either way. Please also include a driveway (highway=service) from the central road into each one. Thanks!
NeisBot (2025-11-08 23:06:42+00:00): Привет, Dikiz, добро пожаловать в проект OSM и спасибо за твой вклад!

Чтобы сделать сотрудничество проще и помочь другим понять твои правки, лучше добавить краткое описание сделанных изменений. Ясные комментарии помогают сообществу следить за твоей работой и предоставлять более качественную обратную связь. Ты можешь найти советы по написанию хороших комментариев здесь[1].
(Auto-translation)
---
Hi Dikiz, welcome to the OSM projekt and thanks for your contribution!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish
NeisBot (2025-11-08 23:06:45+00:00): Вот пример комментария на основе твоих правок карты: "Добавлен центр"
(Auto-translation)
---
Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added center"
DD1GJ (2025-11-09 10:48:23+00:00): All edits have been reverted, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174396433
NeisReview (2025-11-09 12:32:43+00:00): Dankeschön, DD1GJ.
DD1GJ (2025-11-09 00:16:55+00:00): The items you deleted are not superfluous. You have destroyed the work of other contributors. Therefore, all your changes and deletions have been reverted.

Удаленные тобой элементы не являются лишними. Ты уничтожил работу других участников. Поэтому все твои изменения и удаления были отменены.
Dikiz (2025-11-09 14:20:05+00:00): What they did still remains on the standard map, I apologize.
NeisBot (2025-11-08 23:15:47+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Computer repair service in Gdańsku"
NeisBot (2025-11-08 23:15:47+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisBot (2025-11-08 23:15:52+00:00): Na przykład, bardziej neutralna i obiektywna wersja Twojego opisu mogłaby brzmieć: "Usługa naprawy komputerów w Gdańsku"
---
(Auto-translation)
bartgron (2025-11-09 21:39:43+00:00): Opis - reklama - został usunięty. Proszę o nieużywanie map OpenStreetMap do reklamowania swoich usług.
Pozdrawiam
eggie (2025-11-09 06:50:33+00:00): Tip  Wanneer je religion=christian bv   en denomination= ...  invult krijg je een ander type grafsteensymbool. Bv kruisjes
of davidsterren bij jewish, halve maantjes bij muslim 
gr eggie
simer_lkpg (2025-11-08 23:28:57+00:00): *inkorrekt
kaleidoscopica (2026-03-15 14:56:44+00:00): Take care with the flow direction of waterways - I've had to reverse the direction of many of these. You can also view either the National Map Topographic layer or the USGS Topographic Maps layer to find out what they are named. (For example, the one in this changeset is an extension of the existing Deer Creek to the east.) If you are drawing two waterways on either side of a road, they almost certainly connect with a tunnel, so you can add those tunnels as well so that the waterway network is fully connected.
felipeeugenio (2025-11-09 14:43:43+00:00): No es precisamente un hotel eso. Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174398645
b-jazz (2025-11-10 03:02:33+00:00): RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9105411079

Please be careful to include ALL nodes along a boundary in your fairway. That particular node was missed and that sets of an automated error check that looks for bunkers that overlap fairways (any golf course areas for that matter.)
 
Thanks
hopboy1 (2025-11-10 18:38:49+00:00): Thank you! The boundaries have been updated accordingly.
lonvia (2026-07-24 21:27:39+00:00): Hi, you've added a route here that seems to be nothing more than a suggestion from the tourist office of Roscoff. The route is not signed at all, which even the website you are linking clearly states. This is not a hiking route that should be in OSM in the first place. See the notability rules of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route%3Dhiking
NeisBot (2025-11-09 01:56:28+00:00): Hi Bonginkosi23, welcome to the OSM projekt and thanks for your contribution!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish
NeisBot (2025-11-09 01:56:29+00:00): Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added steps highway"
Jacksonville (2025-11-10 18:40:29+00:00): Yet the highway that links the Kartarpur corridor serves as a link between Narowal - a city and Dera Baba Nanak, a town. The corridor doesn't even directly connect the Gurudwara in Dera Baba Nanak, it connects it to the highway on the Indian side.
CjMalone (2026-07-14 14:29:31+00:00): Hey, what is image=6643145 meant to represent? Is there a URL we can use?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/118900779
tagishsimon (2026-07-15 14:23:36+00:00): Who knows? Probably a mistaken cut & paste for a geograph URL. Now deleted. thx.
CjMalone (2026-07-15 19:52:57+00:00): Thank you
SomeoneElse (2025-11-30 19:32:05+00:00): Hello,

On this changeset you've used a "source=Google Maps" tag. We can't actually use that as a source in OSM because Google's licence doesn't allow it to be used here - it would cause real problems for the project if we were found to be using Google Maps as a source.
If this is somewhere that you are familiar with, then "source=local_knowledge" would be perfectly OK. If not, we'll have to undo this change.

Best Regards
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group
user_5359 (2025-11-09 05:22:20+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/5431644984
 more than 100 meters over streets and buildings. 
I moved the node back to the original position.
Supaplex (2025-11-09 04:34:41+00:00): 如果那個地方沒有門牌號碼，相關地址標籤就不用加了
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174401136
user_5359 (2025-11-09 06:02:04+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please do not delete roads that have restricted access rights. The deleted road was correctly marked with access=private.
user_5359 (2025-11-09 06:02:15+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please do not delete roads that have restricted access rights. The deleted road was correctly marked with access=private.
WaiStreet (2025-11-09 14:07:44+00:00): The driveway has been treaspassed by various delivery services to make delivery to 43 Erland Rd, which has their own driveway. Drivers would stop in the middle and cross planted area to 43 Erland Rd, despite of the no trespassing sign. Is there a way to make sure this is reflected properly in the map that this road is private and belong only to the house?
user_5359 (2025-11-10 13:53:08+00:00): As much as I understand the annoyance at the disregard for the legal situation, deletion is not the solution. 
Our database clearly states that this access road may only be used with permission (access=private). 
But laziness always finds shortcuts, whether they are permitted or not. Only a fence or water can help here. 
Please also note that we do not know what data material the drivers are using.
WaiStreet (2025-11-10 15:07:38+00:00): Thank you for your feedback. I completely understand the importance of keeping existing physical features mapped.

However, the reason this issue keeps coming up is that the private driveway at 49 Erland Rd was mapped, while the neighboring property’s driveway at 43 Erland Rd had not been. Routing engines therefore directed delivery drivers to trespass across my private property to reach 43 Erland Rd.

I have now added the correct driveway for 43 Erland Rd, and it connects properly to the public road.

To prevent further confusion and unauthorized routing, could we please keep a note or tag clarification here such as:
note=No connection between 49 Erland Rd and 43 Erland Rd; driveway at 49 is private and not for through access.

This should maintain mapping accuracy while helping routing systems interpret the access restrictions correctly.

Thanks for helping ensure the map reflects both the real layout and the private nature of the driveways.
WaiStreet (2025-11-10 15:09:49+00:00): As additional context, I recently spoke with a DoorDash delivery driver who showed me the map used in their app.
It clearly displayed a route directing them through my driveway at 49 Erland Rd to reach 43 Erland Rd.
The map source shown in the DoorDash driver app is Mapbox, which relies heavily on OpenStreetMap data.

This confirms that the incorrect routing isn’t just a tagging issue but one that directly affects navigation systems based on OSM.

Adding or keeping a note such as
note=No connection between 49 Erland Rd and 43 Erland Rd; private driveway; not for through access.
will help prevent downstream map providers from propagating this error.
user_5359 (2025-11-10 15:41:29+00:00): There is no reason not to add a corresponding message under the key note. However, such information is not read by map users (especially routing software). 
The decisive solution is that the access road from the neighbour is now marked. After some time (not all software updates its database daily), routing should go via the new access road.
Thank you for pointing out such routing problems.
Kovoschiz (2025-11-17 13:36:36+00:00): The smaller `natural=wood` you deleted may be distinct, and surrounded by other land covers https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/707104216 https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/707104218
Please avoid merging them into a larger one, as this would be reducing the detailedness and precision https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/707104219
It's a hint you have to redraw after deleting https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/707104217 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1450268325
Kovoschiz (2025-11-17 13:40:14+00:00): There are clear gaps between some. It should not be an aim to fill it fully in a simplistic method. https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/707104213 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/707104214
kingkingHK (2025-11-18 03:22:39+00:00): Admittedly I did not focus too much on the precise geometry and simplified some as I expect a natural forest's land cover to change constantly anyway so it shouldn't matter too much. Another factor was that the whole area is sparsely wooded making it difficult to decide where the `natural=wood` ends. And different aerial imagery sources differ quite a lot too.

My original intentional was to provide basic information on the vegetation on this area (which was empty), so maybe the precision wasn't the best. Feel free to rework on this area if you want to.
TheNightRider (2025-11-09 05:12:21+00:00): Oops, that was the residential area boundary
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-11-09 18:53:39+00:00): Hello, what was the point of that? Having a node and a building represent the same thing makes the map look cluttered; it also violates the "one element, one feature" rule.
user_5359 (2025-11-09 19:00:45+00:00): The business have the value addr:unit=100. Then building and business are two elements, if there is also a different addr:unit value. (see point Multiple-use buildings)
BubbaJuice (2025-11-09 06:20:22+00:00): https://docs.tep.com/wp-content/uploads/Harrison-Substation-Location-1.pdf
Nakaner (2026-03-06 17:51:20+00:00): Hi gscholz,

thank you for your effort to fix issues reported by OSM Inspector.

As already pointed out by woodpeck in October 2024 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157908804), I would like to ask you to be more careful when you work on issues reported by OSMI.

OSMI runs a couple of validation checks and reports the issues it finds on its website. However, in many cases these issues are just the tip of an iceberg. The largest part does not appear on QA tools.

Therefore, I kindly ask you not to blindly just fix errors reported by quality assurance tools like OSM Inspector but to look for the real reason. Who edited the intersecting way (or its nodes)? What did they do in their recent changesets.

Sometimes it is just a new user who did things wrong. If so, please message them. We are wasting resources (time of mappers) if QA mappers regularly clean up after newbies.

In some cases, the changeset/user causing the error reported by OSMI uploaded complete garbage. In such cases, your "fix" does not help OSM. Instead, it makes things worse.

This changeset hid a serious issue (broken boundary relation, multiple intersecting ways, fictional names, uploaded personal hiking trip). In order to clean things up, I had to find and revert a couple well-intended but incomplete changesets before I could clean up things completely.

By looking at https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?user=gscholz&commented, I found out that you regularly write comments to other mappers' bad changesets. Please continue to do so.

Best regards

Michael
Vinber-Pro (2025-11-10 10:35:14+00:00): Coucou,
je pense qu'il y a une erreur ici :)

à plus
sebcadier (2025-11-10 20:29:26+00:00): oui effectivement, je me croyais dans les Landes, pas aux sables d'olonnes !!
:-)
corrigé
kamasytrix (2025-11-09 10:47:58+00:00): це откуда така інформація? у вас район міста знаходится за його межами?
Myazyk (2025-11-09 14:51:38+00:00): Йой, шо ж ти тут "понапокращував"...
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:37:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:35:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
vt100 (2025-11-16 09:51:45+00:00): Morgen,

hast Du eine Quelle für die kartierte (geplante) Fläche der Fa. Meierling? Ja, die Artikel in SK und BZ kenn ich.
Ethoz (2025-11-16 15:41:44+00:00): Nein.
Vinber-Pro (2025-11-12 17:08:56+00:00): Salut,
ici aussi les dentistes sont dans la rue :D

je positionne dans le batiment, j'ajoute un fixme=check position pour pouvoir revenir plus facilement dessus
Vinber-Pro (2025-11-12 17:10:49+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174569616
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:34:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:37:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-10 14:31:27+00:00): O co chodzi w tej edycji?

"up" jest dość niejasne
bartgron (2025-11-12 20:01:49+00:00): Z racji braku odzewu zestaw zmian wycofany:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174575607
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:37:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
DDD丶Samuel (2025-11-10 05:13:02+00:00): 您好，除京沪高铁外，name字段请填写xx线、xx高速线、xx客专线、xx城际线。请勿填写xx高铁、xx高速铁路等偏向运营属性的名称。OSM要求突出基础建设属性，xx高速铁路、xx高铁可填入official_name字段或alt_name字段，用半角分号分隔不同的名称
lpf452 (2025-12-01 04:22:42+00:00): (才看到你的 changeset comment，抱歉。)

你说得有道理。但是，OSM 数据最终有一部分是面向普通用户的，在国人的认知中“高铁”比“高速线”更能表达实际的作用，“高速线”会产生歧义 (毕竟这不是一条高速公路)，而有歧义的名称应该放 'alt_name' 而不是 'name' 挂在地图上

我在 2025/11/4 进行了一次实地考察，发现沿途标注的都是类似于 “‘西渝高铁’大竹段” 这种，没有一处写着 “西渝高速线”。因此，'name' 标 “西渝高铁” 更合适 (Ground Truth)。

我认为，保持目前的标注更合适：
- alt_name → 西渝高速线
- name → 西渝高铁
- official_name → 西渝高速铁路

你觉得呢？期待您的看法。
DDD丶Samuel (2025-12-01 07:25:49+00:00): 您好，可以参考这篇文章https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hans:OpenRailwayMap/Tagging_in_China
沿途标注的为工程名，西渝高铁处于在建状态，可以暂时使用工程名等非正式名称，但是最终开通运行后name字段需要填写LKJ或CTCS中工务段对其维护的命名
lpf452 (2025-12-01 13:06:19+00:00): 收到了你的建议，谢谢。待全线通车后我会再对其进行一次 survey，届时更新 'name'信息
eggie (2025-11-09 18:13:24+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
NorthCrab_upload (2025-11-09 09:00:55+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13062337134
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1448564397

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eggie (2025-11-09 18:14:30+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Mannivu (2025-11-09 10:27:34+00:00): Grazie per la modifica! Un solo appunto: I parcheggi come questo, che richiedono di uscire dalla carreggiata per parcheggiare vanno indicati con parking=street_side.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174407610
mcliquid (2025-11-12 14:30:18+00:00): Hallo 0x0669, vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag mit Go Map!!! 🌍

Ein kleiner Hinweis für die Zukunft: Änderungen sollten möglichst lokal bleiben.
Dein aktuelles Changeset erstreckt sich von Paris bis Klagenfurt, also über eine sehr große Entfernung – das kann für andere Mapper und Reviewer schwer nachvollziehbar sein.

Um die Überprüfung von Änderungen zu erleichtern, ist es empfehlenswert:
- Änderungen innerhalb eines kleinen geografischen Bereichs (z. B. einer Stadt, eines Bezirks oder einer Region) zusammenzufassen,
- Änderungen innerhalb desselben Landes zu halten,
- und vor dem Wechsel in ein anderes Gebiet die bisherigen Änderungen hochzuladen bzw. zu speichern.

Warum das wichtig ist, wird hier im Wiki erklärt:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Vielen Dank fürs Beachten – und weiterhin viel Spaß beim Mappen! 😊
Poprawiłem (2026-06-30 10:47:56+00:00): Na obszarze, który był ograniczony przez way/1448567083 i way/1448567084, jest pole.
maraf24 (2026-07-01 18:44:19+00:00): Jak widać ktoś poprawił 2 miesiące temu, a źródło masz podane w source.
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:37:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:38:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
eggie (2025-11-09 18:47:50+00:00): Dag Tjerk . Is de naam dan het zelfde gebleven?
Dag besteding
amenity=social_facility
social_facility=day_care

En dan de naam?

MVG
eggie
jeroen290580 (2025-11-09 10:46:37+00:00): Ik werk zelf bij politie. Nr 40 is JOC, nr 44 is wel degelijk het hoofdcommisariaat van de PZ
Jakka (2025-11-09 10:52:04+00:00): Heb punt verplaats naar gebouw 44 thx
NorthCrab_upload (2025-11-09 10:00:49+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11313789620
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1448572002

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
JarlathPL (2025-11-09 10:32:27+00:00): Zbędne pole adresowe usunięte - dzięki