piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
fititnt (2024-06-30 22:07:53+00:00): Olá JohnW11

Voce deletou uma igreja adicionada pelo fernandobohrer 8 anos atrás https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4293762732/history no changeset com source=knowledge (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/40620590) sem manter o histórico (veja https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history). Nesse caso, se realmente queria mover as tags para a edificação (e, note: poderia deixar como estava) deveria ter mesclado o node na way.

Sim, é possível ver que criou https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1292099679/history com as tags que o mapeador local adicionou (porém ainda colocou como source=microsoft/BuildingFootprints).

Você poderia por favor restaurar o node/4293762732?
HAmap (2024-06-16 10:03:24+00:00): Hallo @GeoAndi und @WoSoe,
ihr seid beide mit an der Relation "Lorenzer Reichswald" dran. Meine Frage: Ich habe die Grenze verschoben um das Krankenhausgelände und den Friedhof in Rummelsberg aus der Waldfläche heraus zu nehmen. Erst danach habe ich kapiert, dass es nicht nur ein Waldgebiet, sondern auch eine administrative Grenze (gemeindefreies Gebiet) ist. Sollte ich den alten Grenz-Verlauf wieder herstellen?
Kann es sein, dass ein Teil von Rummelsberg auf gemeindefreien Gebiet liegt?
HAmap (2024-06-16 12:07:06+00:00): Die Gemeinde Schwarzenbruck hat den Flächennutzungsplan erstellt und die Klinik als Sondergebiet ausgewiesen, von einem gemeindefreien Gebiet ist nicht die Rede. Ist die Grenzrelation Lorenzer Reichswald evlt. veraltet?
https://schwarzenbruck.de/portfolio-items/bebpl-nr-0076-sana-klinik-rummelsberg/
HAmap (2024-06-16 12:08:47+00:00): Auf dem Planblatt sieht man, dass auch ein neuer Straßenanschluss entstehen wird.
https://schwarzenbruck.de/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/BEBPL-Nr.-0076-B-Plan-Planblatt.pdf
hahae (2026-06-04 04:05:10+00:00): 您好，我注意到您添加的很多建筑有和卫星图对不上的情况，请问您是按照建筑物wiki绘制的吗？烦请修改，谢谢
Langlaeufer (2024-06-14 07:07:35+00:00): Hallo,
der Fußweg ist an der Stelle bereits mittels sidewalk=right an der Fahrbahnachse erfasst. Der Weg ist nicht klar als Radweg erkennbar (keine Schilder, Markierungen, Radwegfurten) und somit ein Fußweg
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152634742
frasty (2024-06-15 00:09:03+00:00): Hi, this is definetly not a city. Having a population of less then 7000 inhabitants this is a village as it is stated in the wiki page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Tag:place=village?uselang=it
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-06-17 18:06:23+00:00): Please, can you read and follow https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments ?
Dawid2849 (2024-06-13 13:47:26+00:00): Źródło: https://www.gov.pl/photo/5922ad66-41ed-4dc0-9250-ff0a010afe1b.
FraukeLeo (2024-08-04 17:04:12+00:00): Hallo jjacob61200, der Weg am Solarpark vorbei ist von Bauart (für zweispurige Fahrzeuge befahrbar) sowie von der Beschilderung her eindeutig highway=track, nicht footway. Footway wäre ein blauer Lolli. Ich habs mal wieder zurückgeändert.
ivanbranco (2024-06-13 14:04:17+00:00): Hi Erick,

"the DWG has, numerous times, asked you to apply useful changeset comments when making edits to OSM."
Strubbl (2024-06-15 21:04:55+00:00): Hi theaembee, entsprechend der Doku zu Name https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names wäre es vielleicht besser statt name:de zu missbrauchen, den Key short_name oder alt_name zu benutzen. Was denkst du?
theaembee (2024-06-17 07:31:18+00:00): Hallo Strubbl, danke für den Hinweis. War mir nicht bekannt. Ich denke short_name ist dafür vorgesehen. Passe ich an.
eggie (2024-06-13 14:31:57+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback  Je hebt woning Veldstukken nr 5 geheel verwijderd. Is dat gesloopt?
Aan nr 3 heb je een bloemenwinkel toegevoeg aan de gebouwomtrek. We doen dat in OSM in de regel op de adresnode.
Is dit werkelijk een bloemenwinkel.


MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-06-13 14:38:35+00:00): De info heb ik op de adresnode gezet en de woning nr 5 hersteld.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=152635583

MVG
eggie
Gotchax1991 (2024-06-13 15:22:42+00:00): Bedankt voor je feedback eggie, Ik moet mezelf nog een beetje wegwijs maken binnen OSM. De woning had niet verwijderd moeten worden, deze zal ik weer toevoegen. Het klopt dat hier zich een bloemist gevestigd heeft. 

Vriendelijke groet, 
Dennis
eggie (2024-06-13 15:28:18+00:00): Hoi Dennis. De woning had ik al teruggehaald. Het is import vanuit het Kadaster.
Alle begin is moeilijk.

Groet..
eggie
yelisey90 (2024-07-01 12:39:51+00:00): Florist? Or rather shop=cannabis with cannabis:recreational=no, 
cannabis:medical=no,
cannabis:cbd=yes,
cannabis:seeds=yes ?
literan (2024-06-13 17:08:23+00:00): Добрый день

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#%D0%98%D0%BC%D1%8F_%E2%80%93_%D1%8D%D1%82%D0%BE_%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%B8_%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%BA%D0%BE

Универмаг это тип объекта, он задается отдельным тегом shop=department_store
archpdx (2024-08-09 09:14:59+00:00): Hi,
I noticed that this changeset adds a fire pit as a park. This should instead be tagged as `leisure=firepit`: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dfirepit
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152636807
KiloThree (2024-06-13 14:47:06+00:00): Hello, please try to keep changesets locally constrained. This helps anyone looking at changeset history or reviewing changes. Since this changeset edits a building in Florida and a way intersection in Belgium, the bounding box of the changeset covers the whole North Atlantic, so anyone looking at history anywhere within that area will see your changeset in the history, even if the nodes you changed aren't in the area they are looking at
Teremys (2024-10-28 09:32:36+00:00): Bonjour, 
Serait il possible de remettre les tags "name" et "smoothness" supprimés des éléments quais lors de cette modification ? 
Merci d'avance.
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-14 05:41:22+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152659559
NeisBot (2024-06-13 14:48:24+00:00): Hi Matys1313, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1292127148

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-15 13:33:26+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152721826
NeisBot (2024-06-13 14:54:24+00:00): Hi Matys1313, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1292128426

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-14 05:51:27+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152659830
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-14 05:52:39+00:00): Please don't add fictional map elements. Thank you!
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-14 05:44:12+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/152659623
os-emmer (2024-08-25 09:51:26+00:00): Hallo Ebrithil90 und willkommen bei OSM.
Du hast hier einen THW Ortsverband hinzugefügt:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11978564469
Dieser existierte etwas weier südlich bereits in OSM:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11392674756
Eine solche doppelte erfassung ist nicht sinnvoll. Weißt du, welche der beiden Positionen besser passt? Oder kennst du sogar den genauen Umriss des Geländes des Ortsverbandes? Dann könnten wir diesen als Fläche eintragen.
NeisBot (2024-06-13 15:00:25+00:00): Hi Matys1313, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1201872997

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-14 05:50:53+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152659813
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-14 05:52:36+00:00): Please don't add fictional map elements. Thank you!
literan (2024-06-13 18:11:46+00:00): кривой формат адрески. Надо ставить пробел перед буквами "к", "с", "вл"

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%90%D0%B4%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%B0#%D0%9D%D1%83%D0%BC%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%B2
NorthCrab_upload (2024-06-13 15:00:22+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11978567467

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eggie (2024-06-13 15:38:06+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback Alleen een naam doet niets in OSM.
shop=alcohol?? 



MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Leo Slager (2024-06-19 10:57:49+00:00): toegevoegd:
craft=brewery
brewery=tea
eggie (2024-06-13 15:41:40+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback In de BGT staat wel Wollfsputter Baan?

https://www.verbeterdekaart.nl/#?geometry.x=177854.77&geometry.y=386710.66&zoomlevel=9.49

Wat is je bron in deze?

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-06-13 15:43:35+00:00): Je zou een terugmelding kunnen doe via Verbeterdekaart Kadaster
Zie link hierboven.
Doe je dat zelf?

MVG
eggie
Guuskeee (2024-06-14 07:30:31+00:00): Hallo Eggie, dank je voor je hulp. Ik heb het doorgegeven op verbeterdekaart, en sindsdien enkele reacties daarop gehad van het Kadaster. Het Kadaster heeft het nu doorgestuurd naar de BAG (basisregistratie adressen en gebouwen) om het verder te beoordelen.
NeisBot (2024-06-13 15:03:25+00:00): Hi Matys1313, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature's:
https://osm.org/way/1292131991
https://osm.org/way/1292131992

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-14 05:50:38+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152659800
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-14 05:52:33+00:00): Please don't add fictional map elements. Thank you!
NeisBot (2024-06-13 15:06:25+00:00): Hi Matys1313, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/51209073

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-14 05:49:14+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152659758
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-14 05:52:29+00:00): Please don't add fictional map elements. Thank you!
BR_pebble (2025-02-14 08:31:47+00:00): Hello Kingsley AMANKWE
 Thank you for mapping!
 I restored a deleted building way 1315057727
 Please inspect your task carefully before closing.
 Happy Mapping!
BR_pebble (2025-02-14 08:31:23+00:00): Hello Kingsley AMANKWE
 Thank you for mapping!
 I restored a deleted building way 1315057354
 Please inspect your task carefully before closing.
 Happy Mapping!
HAmap (2024-06-14 10:51:43+00:00): Danke, das ist mir passiert, ohne dass ich es bemerkt habe.
Beste Grüße HAmap
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-29 07:03:31+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11978545042/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
Alexandr_Kalinin (2025-05-05 07:00:54+00:00): Hello! Clarified the purpose of the store.
shop:variety_store
MxxCon (2024-06-19 16:50:12+00:00): Hello.
Please note that multiple bus routes (like most other lists in OSM) must be separated using ; and not just a space.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152638859
eggie (2024-06-13 15:47:34+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-06-13 15:51:24+00:00): Op 23 mei jl stond het gebouw dat je hebt verwijderd nog gewoon in het veld?  Is dat in twee weken gesloopt.
Je edits.
https://www.satellietdataportaal.nl/?base=openstreetmap&res=0.3%2C0.5&datemin=13-06-2023&loc=53.01721%2C6.737281%2C20z&overlay=mos-0&marker=loc&acqdate=2024-04-23&acqid=20240423_104444_PNEO-04_1_1&sensor=Pleiades-NEO
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-06-13 15:52:47+00:00): Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=152639396

Wat rood kleurt heb je verwijderd. 
mvg
eggie
eggie (2024-06-13 16:11:10+00:00): https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/?searchQuery=Brinkstraat+5+eext&objectId=1680100000009960&theme=BRT+Achtergrond&geometry.x=245611.801&geometry.y=559767.0569999998&zoomlevel=15&bijbehorendeAdressen=Pand
eggie (2024-06-13 16:14:56+00:00): Voorlopig de verwijderde bouwsel teruggezet.
Doe een terugmelding naar de BAG als deze panden zijn gesloopt. 
Zie link boven. 
Groet eggie
pantufla (2024-06-19 12:00:12+00:00): Perfecto, no hay problema en hacer pruebas. Si tienes alguna duda o algo te podemos ayudar. En la app Organic Maps es muy fácil hacer estas ediciones y cuando son más complejas directamente en openstreetmap.org como bien has hecho. Que tengas buen día :)
aceman444 (2025-03-15 22:56:39+00:00): Zdravim, preco vsetky tie znacky ako platform,bus_stop,shelter,bin aj na objekte celej stanice? To vyzera byt nespravne.
Filip009 (2025-03-16 06:07:32+00:00): Okej, vďaka za info. Už budem vedieť, že to tam nemusí byť.
aceman444 (2025-03-16 12:02:43+00:00): Tie patria na jednotlive nastupistia, a kazde moze mat ine vlastnosti.
A hlavne public_transport=platform na stanici je v konflikte s public_transport=station, ktore tam ma byt. Opravil som to.
gurglypipe (2024-06-13 19:12:17+00:00): Hiya, just a hint: you can press ‘Q’ when a building is selected to automatically square its corners. It makes for a neater map :)
jenny_lanningrush (2024-06-13 16:09:12+00:00): and because there is an "Avenue P 1/2" mapping software at times navigates to the wrong steet.
TrickyFoxy (2025-03-02 08:15:17+00:00): 👋 admin_level=1 Did you mean building:levels=1?

https://openstreetmap.org/way/1292148238
dddos (2025-03-05 00:21:18+00:00): Thanx, TrickyFoxy!
Tag now is building:min_level=1
Autocomplete was faster than me. 
Sorry for my delayed answer!
HAmap (2024-06-13 17:27:51+00:00): Hallo Andi, 
hab das schon wieder ich verbockt? ;-)
GeoAndi (2024-06-13 17:30:20+00:00): Nein, alles gut. Ich hab nur ein paar fehlende Wald-Flächen zur Relation "Lorenzer Reichswald" ergänzt.
GeoAndi (2024-06-13 17:32:55+00:00): Wenn ich mir grad aber die History der Relation so anschaue, hattest du schon was "verbockt", wurde aber bereits von jemand anderem repariert.
HAmap (2024-06-14 10:47:04+00:00): Da schau ich mal nach, das senkt langfristig die Fehlerquote :-)
akimapbuilder (2024-06-14 06:13:00+00:00): Hi! I had to revert your changeset since the building you added overlaps with an already existing building.
miluethi (2024-06-13 17:31:12+00:00): Hi Sylvia,

Please try to square out building shapes whenever possible. 99% of the buildings are square.

Also narrow down the shapes to match the aerial imagery exactly.

Thank you for your contribution to OSM Nicaragua and Happy Mapping!
GeoBoris (2024-06-14 13:54:04+00:00): Le chemin d'accès au pont et le pont ne sont pas qu'une simple piste cyclable ? Il est réservé aux piétons et aux vélos. Par conséquent, Highway=Path devrait s'appliquer.
syntex (2024-06-13 20:25:01+00:00): I tak właśnie było oznaczone. Już się tak nie nazywa i ma stary znacznik nazwy w old_name. Dlaczego zmieniasz nazwę na "Ulica Wiatraczna" i podwyższasz klasę ślepej drogi do tertiary i dodatkowo psujesz poprawną geometrię?
syntex (2024-06-13 20:27:17+00:00): Wycofane
olecky (2024-11-12 09:57:43+00:00): Are horses really allowed here? IIRC there is a cycle and pedestrian track sign from the Brussels side, and a cycle track sign from the Flemish (Vier Armen) side. I haven't seen any horses on it, and they would be bad for the compacted surface. It's also not included as a bridlepath on the map (https://sonianforest.be/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/BIM_ZONIENWOUD-V2020-WEB-copy.pdf).
bxl-forever (2024-11-12 15:21:52+00:00): I get your point, so probably horse=yes should be removed here.
But if you want to comment a changeset, you should address your comment to the mapper who introduced "horse=yes" here.  If you inspect the history of those ways, you will see that my changeset was not about deciding to change access for horses but to clean up some obvious errors in tags (merely for pedestrians or to remove motor_vehicle=no, which is implicit for paths and footways).
eggie (2024-06-13 18:41:44+00:00): Hi I merged your contribution with the present addressnode. No nee adding addresses. Just use the present addressnode.
Gr eggie
eisa01 (2024-06-29 10:57:22+00:00): Thanks for adding to the map!

Campingvogner is not a proper name, so deleted that. Is this rather a caravan site? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dcaravan_site
fabfab38 (2024-06-29 11:09:46+00:00): Yes sorry, I thought same later. No it's not a caravan site, it's a field, with a small parking if I remember correctly.
syntex (2024-06-13 20:27:13+00:00): Wycofane
yelisey90 (2024-07-07 17:59:20+00:00): Reverted deletion of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5439603822 : the board is still there
emersonveenstra (2024-06-14 11:47:27+00:00): Hi there,

For the diameter tags, the correct unit specification for inches is not "in", it's using " (see the "Distance,
height, or
length" row on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_features/Units#Explicit_specifications). Could you please fix this? Thanks!
reschultzed (2024-06-14 14:33:00+00:00): Hello,

It seems that ending the diameter value with a " is not actually possible, as it automatically removes that character from the end before saving. Probably because of this, using "in" appears to be more common in practice, although there's not too many well-documented pipelines in the US and thus a small sample size to draw from.
village (2024-06-19 06:30:36+00:00): Danke für den Paketshop;  2 Öffnungszeiten sind aber kaputtgegangen: https://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/?EXP=Mo-Sa%2007%3A00-22%3A00%20Su%20off&lat=51.3194782&lon=12.4252435
https://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/?EXP=mo-sa%207%3A00-22%3A00%20su%20off&lat=51.319618&lon=12.4254985

Hab's mal repariert: https://osm.org/changeset/152877377
eggie (2024-06-13 18:24:09+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback   Probeer niet te schuiven met de kaart in editmodus. Dus eerder uploaden. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
richlv (2024-06-13 19:14:48+00:00): Liels paldies par kartes papildināšanu.

Vai šie ceļi ir apzīmēti ar (zilo) dzīvojamās zonas zīmi?
TheWildFox (2024-06-17 12:45:25+00:00): Nē, nekādu zīmju nebija. Smainīju uz residental. Cerams būs pareizi.
Xvtn (2024-06-15 13:58:01+00:00): Howdy! Did you happen to catch if this pickleball court is open for public use? Or is it private?
Kuatsystems (2024-06-16 02:53:05+00:00): this is a private court, it belongs to the coeur d'alene property, https://www.airbnb.com/rooms/952334973101042506?source_impression_id=p3_1714871540_9sm0yVUhTisOQSyN&check_in=2024-07-17&guests=5&adults=3&check_out=2024-07-19&children=2&modal=PHOTO_TOUR_SCROLLABLE
rskedgell (2024-07-22 13:45:47+00:00): What has a poor innocent private residential driveway ever done to deserve the busmiles approach to random access tagging? Reverted.
Jordi MF (2024-06-13 22:19:20+00:00): Hola,

Lee el siguiente apartado de la wiki en el que se explica que no hay que añadir traducciones si no existen en la práctica ni transliteraciones: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#When_to_avoid_transliteration
Dawid2849 (2024-06-14 10:11:18+00:00): Smoothess raczej do zmiany w takim razie
Teremys (2024-10-28 09:33:37+00:00): Bonjour, 
Serait il possible de remettre les tags "name" et "smoothness" supprimés des éléments quais lors de cette modification ? 
Merci d'avance.
i2004 (2024-06-14 00:52:32+00:00): TE AGREGE PARADAS DEL 184
rskedgell (2024-07-24 10:47:30+00:00): I don't know why you fel that deleting a parking aisle here would help the busmiles router snap journeys to roads.  Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154343747
miluethi (2024-07-03 22:47:36+00:00): Clarence,

Your building shapes are far bigger than the aerial imagery. I'm going to delete them.
mavl (2024-06-14 04:48:26+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок добавляет адрес, в том числе теги addr:street и addr:place. Разве можно добавлять эти теги одновременно?
dingoy29 (2024-06-15 16:36:10+00:00): Добрый день! Считаю, что в таком виде адрес будет выглядеть полнее. Вы предлагаете изменить? Если да, то в каком виде?
mavl (2024-06-16 05:16:54+00:00): Спасибо за ответ. Адрес не может быть полнее или неполнее по мнению какого-либо человека. Почтовый адрес вещь официальная и однозначная. Указывать его нужно "как есть".  
  
Если у вас есть какие-либо вопросы, то вы можете их задавать на форуме. Регистрация на нём не нужна. Используется учётная запись OpenStreetMap.  
  
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/ru/63  
  
Ваши вопросы:  
    > Вы предлагаете изменить?  
  
Да, так как очевидно, что объект не может адресоваться одновременно и по улице, и по территории.  

    > Если да, то в каком виде?  
  
В правильном виде. Нужно указать реальный почтовый адрес.
mavl (2024-06-19 16:23:30+00:00): Здравствуйте. Напишите, пожалуйста, вы сами исправите ошибку или мне отменить ваши пакеты правок, как ошибочные?
dingoy29 (2024-06-19 16:27:00+00:00): Здравствуйте! Исправлю прямо сейчас.
mavl (2024-06-19 17:36:20+00:00): Спасибо.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-06-13 18:40:22+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1037626267

Pozdrawiam! 🦀