piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Robhubi (inaktiv) (2023-11-11 18:19:20+00:00): Zum Emmaus Winzerweg: gut recherchiert – Kompliment. 
Ein Problem sehe ich hier: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1807253703060490 

Ich frage mich, ob es Sinn macht, einen Weg in die Relation aufzunehmen, der nicht begangen werden kann/darf, selbst wenn er richtig getaggt wäre. Eine Wanderroute setzt m.E. immer eine öffentliche Begehbarkeit voraus.
BG Robert
troglobiont (2023-11-12 07:40:08+00:00): Das schaut nur nach einer kurzfristigen Umleitung aus die gilt solange der Bauer seine Kühe und Ochsen auf der Weide hat. Bei meinem Besuch gab es Kartonpfeile die zum Tor und den unteren Pfad gewiesen haben. Der Wegverlauf oben hat Tore,  Zaunübertritte und ein Bankerl und ist gut markiert.
Robhubi (inaktiv) (2023-11-12 17:28:04+00:00): Na ja, der gespannte Elektrodraht über den Durchstieg schaut mir eher endgültig aus …  man wird den Bauern befragen müssen, wie das gemeint ist. 
Bist du mit dem TVB Südsteiermark in Kontakt?
troglobiont (2023-11-12 22:08:48+00:00): Nein, bin ich nicht.
map per (2023-10-27 06:10:31+00:00): REVERTED
vasony (2023-10-27 04:29:20+00:00): Szia!

Mi a forrása a Lévay-nak, az utcatáblán és a hivatalos utcajegyzékben is Lévai József utca.

Tamás
Koszab (2023-10-27 10:09:13+00:00): Lévay József-ről nevezték el az utcát. Az utcatáblák is Lévay József.
vasony (2023-10-27 10:23:38+00:00): Melyik sarkon? Tavaly októberben végigfotóztuk az összes táblát, itt van előttem és i-vel szerepel rajta.
Koszab (2023-10-27 10:36:14+00:00): Y-nal kell írni. Ez van.
Rossz táblák voltak/vannak kint.
vasony (2023-10-27 12:41:14+00:00): Most akkor rossz a tábla vagy sem, előbb azt mondtad, hogy y-nal vannak a táblák kint.

Mert osm szempontból nem mindegy, hogy csak szerinted y-os és az összes tábla i, vagy tényleg van kint olyen tábla ami y-nal és van ami i-vel van.

osm a tényadatokat rögzíti amit a helyszínen látni, nem azt hogy minek kellene lennie.
urbalazs (2023-10-27 17:36:14+00:00): Kedves Koszab! Ahogy az előzményekben vasony is írta, az OpenStreetMapre felvitt adatok elsődleges forrása a helyszíni adatgyűjtés. Jelen esetben ha az utca Lévaiként van kitáblázva (I-vel, és nem Y-nal), akkor az utcának ez a neve. Teljesen mindegy, hogy kiről nevezték el, és az eredeti személy I-val vagy Y-nal írta a nevét. Ha meghagynák az Y-os változatot, akkor egy másik szerkesztő a helyszínen járva vissza fogja javítani I-re, mert ez szerepel a táblán. Nem egyedi ez a probléma. A jól bevált megoldás, hogy jelezni kell az önkormányzatnak, hogy hibás az utcanévtábla, és kezdeményezni kell a táblák cseréjét. Ha megtörtént a táblák cseréje, akkor át lehet írni a nevet Y-on változatra. Ha az utcában laksz, és a lakcímkártyádon Y-nal szerepel, akkor pedig a te érdeked is, hogy ez a következetlenség megszűnjön. Most visszavontam a módosításcsomagodat, hogy a térkép a helyszínen lévő állapotot tartalmazza. Kérlek, hogy a táblák cseréjéig az legyen OpenStreetMapen is, ami a helyszínen ki van táblázva.
Jordi MF (2023-10-26 20:52:13+00:00): Gràcies. Ahora sí que parece estar todo correcto.
Saludos.
jmsbert (2023-12-03 02:13:44+00:00): Hello Nadine Devich,
thanks for contributing to this humanitarian project in Brazil.
It seems that you mapped far beyond the task limits and even outside of the project area. When working for these kind of projects it is really important to stay within the assigned area. The main reason is that only the mappings inside the boarders will be checked by more experienced mappers during validation - in this case I came more or less randomly across your edits ...
You added several building contures. Please ensure that you square the buildings you add - simply press "q"-key in the editor when the object is selected.
I am just fixing the issues with the building now.
You are very welcome to continue mapping and contributing.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143178348
mcliquid (2023-11-06 11:33:28+00:00): Warum hast du an der Leckner Ach wikidata und wikipedia entfernt? Was ist an den Attributen falsch?
Harald Hetzner (2023-11-06 15:39:01+00:00): Nicht gelöscht, sondern von den x Pfadabschnitten zur einen Relation "Leckner Ach" verschoben.
user_5359 (2023-10-28 11:05:34+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1218616374. What is the mean of the tag _index = 2271.
OSM15WVL (2023-10-28 11:39:54+00:00): I have Correcred that
NorthCrab_upload (2023-10-26 20:10:33+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11291886408

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
yawfle (2023-10-26 23:37:45+00:00): Hi! I'm afraid the boundary was correct before your "fix". Long story short, the earlier annexation actually ran diagonally through that lot, the new annexation was part of the NBC Universal Evolution Project. The official document is here:
https://pwgis.blob.core.windows.net/smpm/SMPM_AnnexationCity/LA0295.pdf
HeyRayReh (2023-10-29 02:12:06+00:00): Apologies for the mistake!  I think this was my first time changing anything anybody cares about instead of, like, the access tags on 5-foot-long pathways!  I should have figured there was a reason it was the way it was.  Before I went back to confirm the buildings were behind the gate and made this change, I had previously changed the pathways in that garden to access:private, is that ok?  I'm new and coming from wandrer.earth, and the pathways in that garden are considered part of the total mileage of foot-accessible streets/paths in Toluca Lake, which makes completing Toluca Lake impossible without getting into Universal.  Hopefully marking them as not public property was a better fix (and I should have quit while I was ahead)?
yawfle (2023-10-29 03:25:30+00:00): > I should have figured there was a reason it was the way it was.

An often-referenced guiding concept for this type of project is Chesterton's Fence:
https://fs.blog/chestertons-fence/

Sometimes it's reality that's wonky. BTW, a handy resource for checking civic boundaries in L.A. county is

https://pw.lacounty.gov/mpm/cityannexations/

> I had previously changed the pathways in that garden to access:private, is that ok?

Yep, if that's the ground truth, then that's how they should be tagged.

> I'm new and coming from wandrer.earth, 

That's an interesting angle to be coming at things from. Doesn't seem like there would be much conflict of interest (unlike certain other forms of "motivated" editing). If you haven't yet, take a look at

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer

which pretty much applies here. The wiki is also a good place to read about the nuances of things like access tags, etc. with the caveat that some of it doesn't translate intuitively to this little corner of the world; at one point I tagged a lot of parking lot entrances as "driveway" before realizing that wasn't the intended use of the tag. Sometimes it's helpful to take a look at the discussion tab for a page that leaves you with some questions - someone else may have already asked.
f_husni (2024-04-15 01:26:42+00:00): hello martymcfly. im husni from jakarta. on this way id https://osm.mapki.com/history/way/1218620879  you look added tag motor_vehicle no tag. and based on this mapilary https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1401553440708470&lat=-6.2970636&lng=106.7212624&z=17&focus=photo&x=0.7267506957434062&y=0.5960242449375182&zoom=0   way id can access by motorcar and it's residential and still open access for general or permissive access.
Corban8 (2024-04-29 20:23:00+00:00): Hello Husni. Thank you for reaching out and letting us know. Thank you for making those updates. Please continue to reach out in the future with any further updates.
pedrito1414 (2023-10-26 21:34:19+00:00): Hi Ibrahim, this one also needs amenity=hospital and the name tag corrected ('name' not 'Names'). Thanks for mapping :)
pedrito1414 (2023-10-28 07:58:47+00:00): Ibrahim, that's looking good now :)
pedrito1414 (2023-10-26 21:30:06+00:00): Hi Ibrahim, this needs to include an amenity=clinic tag and the tag for name needs to be 'name', instead of 'Names'. Great to see you adding some survey data, though! :)
maraf24 (2024-03-29 20:00:28+00:00): Podnoszony szlaban? Prowadzący w nasyp?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11291934373
grzegorz75jan (2024-03-29 20:20:00+00:00): Na orto coś tam jest. Może pozostałość po dawnej drodze. Niekoniecznie szlaban a jakaś bariera.
maraf24 (2024-03-29 23:18:07+00:00): Bariera tak, ale nie podnoszony szlaban. Drogi tu nie było, to nowy wał.
zstadler (2023-10-27 15:36:32+00:00): As far as I can tell, this changeset fixed most of the nodes moved by mistake in changeset 143091238.

You are probably aware that it did not handle nodes that were added earlier in changeset 143049662, such as nodes 11285524168, 11285555370, and 11285478706.

It also did not handle nodes added in changeset 143091238, such as nodes 11287555585 to 11287555588
zstadler (2023-10-27 15:40:03+00:00): This is probably on purpose since the ways that now include them should be reverted properly before these nodes could be deleted.
SomeoneElse (2023-10-27 16:06:12+00:00): Thanks - I'll have a look when I'm next in front of a PC.

There unfortunately will be things that need fixing manually.  A couple of users have had a go at manual coastline fixes. It's difficult to reconcile these with the reverts but the results will broadly (but not always) be a better coastline than was there before.
zstadler (2023-10-27 16:50:09+00:00): Handling the manual edits of coastlines  that were done during the mixture of vandalism and reverts is a topic that should be discussed when it's relevant and their improvements can be evaluated.
Patr1k_P (2023-10-31 15:37:15+00:00): odkial su tie nazvy Sektor Hrad a Sektor Pes Filipes?
matoo_oo (2023-10-31 15:58:14+00:00): Nazvy su zauzivane nazvy lezeckych sektorov v oblasti Krslenica.

LINEK, V. Skaly na Slovensku I: Zahorie. 2015
"Pri pohľade  od dediny sú tu zľava doprava sektory Jaskynky, Pes Filipes, Hrad, Lahôdka a Slnečný hrebeň

https://skalynaslovensku.sk/default.asp?portalid=10&pageid=136&id_object=1468&id_column=1474&id_article=2193
Patr1k_P (2023-10-31 17:14:27+00:00): dakujem..nabuduce uvedte aj "zdroj" vasich dat odkial ste cerpali, t.j. takato webova stranka v tagu "source"
matoo_oo (2023-10-31 17:19:10+00:00): Jasne, budem na to nabuduce pamatat :)
eggie (2023-10-27 05:51:56+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback Vaak zijn tweewielers uitgezonderd van eenrichingsverkeer, Is dat hier het geval?

Dan toevoegen oneway:bicycle=no  en evt ook voor moped en mofa
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
goaned (2023-10-27 07:59:35+00:00): Hallo, das https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4581325007 kann so nicht stimmen. Wenn dieser Brunnen wirklich "Spielbrunnen" heißt (weiß ich nicht), gehört das nur auf den Weg und nicht auch noch auf einen seiner Knoten ohne weitere beschreibende Tags.
YomanNH (2024-05-08 08:17:05+00:00): Hej,

dwukrotnie są stacje I oraz XII, a brakuje II oraz XIII. Obstawiam, że to błąd, ale może rzeczywiście coś tak dziwnego tam jest? Pamiętasz może?
uprkos (2024-05-08 21:15:13+00:00): Oczywiście błąd. Poprawiłem, dzięki! :)
KKS (2023-11-23 16:51:17+00:00): Пане, а шо за фігня з surface=gravel ?га?
WestBam_Ukr (2023-11-24 11:35:25+00:00): там асфальт закінчувався біля кладовища/Мічуріна. кінцева зупинка маршрутки. і до соснової там асфальту не було.
у вас є інша інформація?
archpdx (2023-10-29 01:12:31+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Thanks for mapping features at The Living Desert. Please note that animal enclosures have their own feature type and should not be tagged as parks or commercial areas. Also, buildings in OSM should only cover its footprint (ie https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/47512765).
Aleksandar Matejevic (2023-10-27 08:11:56+00:00): Hi zsolt d, 
please pay attention when adding islands. The coastline representing the island should be counterclockwise.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-10-26 21:30:24+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/514611122

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Peter Elderson (2025-03-02 20:42:52+00:00): Hallo MattijsLeon73 
Wat bedoel je hier met crossing=no? Het voetpad kruist hier de weg, dus dat is een crossing, al hoef je dat niet speciaal te taggen. Als voetgangers hier niet mogen oversteken, dan hoort er geen voetpad gemapt te zijn op de kruising!
MattijsLeon73 (2025-03-02 21:28:58+00:00): De exacte situatie kan ik me niet herinneren, dit was een survey van meer dan een jaar geleden... Als je denkt dat het niet klopt, voel het vooral vrij om het aan te passen.
MattijsLeon73 (2025-03-02 21:33:36+00:00): Deze tagging is gekomen uit een vraag vanuit de app StreetComplete, ik kan me niet meer herinneren wat de vraag precies was.
aceman444 (2025-09-22 21:43:10+00:00): Hi, what is the source of the name of tram stop https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/755544423 ? And of the local_ref of A and E ? If it does not work as a publicly usable tram stop, all the tagging you added is problematic.
impiaaa (2023-10-27 20:38:50+00:00): The reason it's in feet is because that's what's on the sign, so it directly describes the sign; tagging with on-the-ground information is preferred over external sources.
Black_Diamond (2023-10-27 23:33:36+00:00): That's a fair point. I had not considered that view.  The description of the key at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ele says that the value is in meters. So the value seems invalid in that regard. Other objects use this value to note the elevation of the tagged object and not the contents of the sign. So what would you suggest from these options?
1) Leave it as is.
2) Revert it to the previous value.
3) Remove the tag because the value on the sign probably shouldn't be represented as this tag.
4) Convert the value on the sign to meters.
impiaaa (2023-10-28 00:45:29+00:00): Ah, I didn't know it hasn't passed yet: there's an open proposal for allowing other units in ele= https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Ele_with_units
Black_Diamond (2023-10-28 15:21:21+00:00): Based on that information, I’ve switched it to ele:ft. I’ve done that for the following reasons.
1) The ele key is meant for the elevation of the object in meters. This value is not for the sign, but for the written contents.
2) The proposal said that ele:ft should be deprecated. That implies that it’s not deprecated yet, and it is used elsewhere. The unit is explicit, and easy to write.
3) It’s fairly common for editors in various operating systems to turn ASCII quotes to one of the various curly quotes. People also have a tough time remembering whether ‘ or “ means feet. If you need a hilarious example, watch the movie “This is Spinal Tap” with the Stonehenge discussion.
woodpeck (2023-10-27 08:29:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 143187622, 143189318, 143198426, 143191733, 143185239, 143194639 where the changeset comment is: remove vandalism
woodpeck (2023-10-27 08:29:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 143187622, 143189318, 143198426, 143191733, 143185239, 143194639 where the changeset comment is: remove vandalism
woodpeck (2023-10-27 08:29:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 143187622, 143189318, 143198426, 143191733, 143185239, 143194639 where the changeset comment is: remove vandalism
woodpeck (2023-10-27 08:29:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 143187622, 143189318, 143198426, 143191733, 143185239, 143194639 where the changeset comment is: remove vandalism
woodpeck (2023-10-27 08:29:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 143187622, 143189318, 143198426, 143191733, 143185239, 143194639 where the changeset comment is: remove vandalism
woodpeck (2023-10-27 08:29:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 143187622, 143189318, 143198426, 143191733, 143185239, 143194639 where the changeset comment is: remove vandalism
woodpeck (2023-10-27 08:29:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 143187622, 143189318, 143198426, 143191733, 143185239, 143194639 where the changeset comment is: remove vandalism
woodpeck (2023-10-27 08:29:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 143187622, 143189318, 143198426, 143191733, 143185239, 143194639 where the changeset comment is: remove vandalism
woodpeck (2023-10-27 08:29:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 143187622, 143189318, 143198426, 143191733, 143185239, 143194639 where the changeset comment is: remove vandalism
woodpeck (2023-10-27 08:29:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 143187622, 143189318, 143198426, 143191733, 143185239, 143194639 where the changeset comment is: remove vandalism
woodpeck (2023-10-27 08:29:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 143187622, 143189318, 143198426, 143191733, 143185239, 143194639 where the changeset comment is: remove vandalism
woodpeck (2023-10-27 08:29:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 143187622, 143189318, 143198426, 143191733, 143185239, 143194639 where the changeset comment is: remove vandalism
woodpeck (2023-10-27 08:29:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 143187622, 143189318, 143198426, 143191733, 143185239, 143194639 where the changeset comment is: remove vandalism
woodpeck (2023-10-27 08:29:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 143187622, 143189318, 143198426, 143191733, 143185239, 143194639 where the changeset comment is: remove vandalism
woodpeck (2023-10-27 08:29:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 143187622, 143189318, 143198426, 143191733, 143185239, 143194639 where the changeset comment is: remove vandalism
woodpeck (2023-10-27 08:29:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 143187622, 143189318, 143198426, 143191733, 143185239, 143194639 where the changeset comment is: remove vandalism
woodpeck (2023-10-27 08:29:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 143187622, 143189318, 143198426, 143191733, 143185239, 143194639 where the changeset comment is: remove vandalism
woodpeck (2023-10-27 08:29:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 143187622, 143189318, 143198426, 143191733, 143185239, 143194639 where the changeset comment is: remove vandalism
woodpeck (2023-10-27 08:29:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 143187622, 143189318, 143198426, 143191733, 143185239, 143194639 where the changeset comment is: remove vandalism
woodpeck (2023-10-27 08:29:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 143187622, 143189318, 143198426, 143191733, 143185239, 143194639 where the changeset comment is: remove vandalism
woodpeck (2023-10-27 08:29:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 143187622, 143189318, 143198426, 143191733, 143185239, 143194639 where the changeset comment is: remove vandalism
woodpeck (2023-10-27 08:29:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 143187622, 143189318, 143198426, 143191733, 143185239, 143194639 where the changeset comment is: remove vandalism
woodpeck (2023-10-27 08:29:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 143187622, 143189318, 143198426, 143191733, 143185239, 143194639 where the changeset comment is: remove vandalism
woodpeck (2023-10-27 08:29:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 143187622, 143189318, 143198426, 143191733, 143185239, 143194639 where the changeset comment is: remove vandalism
woodpeck (2023-10-27 08:29:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 143187622, 143189318, 143198426, 143191733, 143185239, 143194639 where the changeset comment is: remove vandalism
woodpeck (2023-10-27 08:29:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 143187622, 143189318, 143198426, 143191733, 143185239, 143194639 where the changeset comment is: remove vandalism
eggie (2023-10-27 05:54:53+00:00): Dag Jan,

Waarom zet je al die paden op sloyt met access=no  Staat daar overal een bord Verboden toegang?
Dat zal toch niet?
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=143183476

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-10-27 06:04:25+00:00): Het gebouw aan de Vicarielaan 9 had je per abuis vastgemaakt aan de hoofdrijbaan. Ik heb  het hersteld. access=no en foot=yes (onnodig op wandelpaden) heb ik verwijderd. Alle begin is moeilijk. 
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=143183476

Veel plezier met mappen.
eggie
eggie (2023-10-27 06:07:40+00:00): Nog even het Horsterhoekpad uit de knoop gehaald. (crossing ways) Tip.Check steeds wat je hebt gedaan.
JanMulder (2023-10-27 08:38:17+00:00): Beste Eggie,
dankjewel voor de feedback en herstel!
Alle begin in inderdaad moeilijk ;-)
Het is mooi dat de nieuwe bijdragen gecontroleerd worden want ondanks dat ik dacht zorgvuldig gehandeld te hebben kun je er dus snel een chaos van maken.
Ik heb Gomap gebruikt (toevallig gevonden). Als er eigenlijk betere apps zij hoor ik dat graag
Groeten,
Jan
eggie (2023-10-27 09:36:08+00:00): Dag Jan,

Laat je overigens niet weerhouden door kritiek.
Iedereen was ooit beginner. 

Go map is erg beperkt. 
Het beste programma om te mappen is JOSM. De aanrader dus. 
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/editor-josm-stap-voor-stap/75047

De online editor iD is ook wel bruikbaar, maar genereert ook veel fouten zoals alles aan elkaar plakken en kan ook niet met (fiets, wandel, OV) routerelaties omgaan. 

Mapse, 
eggie
woodpeck (2023-10-27 08:29:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 143187622, 143189318, 143198426, 143191733, 143185239, 143194639 where the changeset comment is: remove vandalism