piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
BCNorwich (2024-10-22 11:00:03+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

This company is already mapped within this building. I've added the phone number to the existing node and removed your duplicate node. Please make any corrections to existing features.

Regards Bernard.
TrickyFoxy (2024-10-22 22:37:12+00:00): 👋 Писать в name=Жилой дом не нужно, потому что уже указан building=house
ma-rt-in (2024-11-02 09:24:21+00:00): Hallo und Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap (OSM).
Dein erster Versuch sieht schon ganz gut aus.
Hier ein paar Infos:
Hier eine Seite für Dich im Wiki, welche Dir bei den ersten Schritten hilft: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Willkommen_bei_OpenStreetMap

OSM hat verschiedene Grundsätze, als Beispiel tragen wir noch DInge ein welche auch vor Ort vorfindbar sind. Sogleich ist löschen aber oftmachs eine schlechte Idee, denn dadurch gehen Informationen verloren.
So komme ich zur Frage, weshalb Du 2x Bushaltepositionen gelöscht hast, aber die Wartepositionen stehen gelassen hast.
Freue mich auf eine Rückmeldung.

vg
lankapuhelin (2025-06-05 20:08:06+00:00): Why have you removed cycleway status from this way? I believe it should be reinstated as bicycle=designated and foot=designated. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/56269033
bolabisin (2025-06-05 20:46:55+00:00): Hi! Thank you for the comment. It was definitely not changed without reason, but I do not remember the details and unable to resurvey for the time being. I have no reason to doubt this and have changed it back to cycle & foot path.
NeisBot (2024-10-22 08:21:07+00:00): Ooops, it seems that some of your names are a bit unusual ...

Amount>=1
#NeisLab #Minutely #Naming
pitscheplatsch (2024-10-22 14:51:34+00:00): Based on the automatic translation this changeset should be #vandalism or #spam. Any thoughts?
pitscheplatsch (2024-10-23 15:52:33+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158221614
A35K (2024-10-22 15:25:43+00:00): Bitte platziere keine POIs auf den highways, sondern an ihren tatsächlichen Standorten. 

Ausserdem gibt es den tag office=surveyor für Sachverständiger/Gutachter. 

Ich bin auch skeptisch, ob es diesen Gutachter/Sachverständiger in dieser Stadt überhaupt gibt.
Supaplex (2024-10-23 02:53:02+00:00): Hi njrig78qbn

We receive a report about your edit. It seems there are some problems. if it is a physic location, it should not be attached to a road, it should be in a building.

I will fix the problem, but you should edit the location in the right place.

Dennis Raylin Chen
Data Working Group
data@osmfoundation.org
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158200635
Supaplex (2024-10-23 02:54:49+00:00): Hallo njrig78qbn

Wir haben einen Bericht über Ihre Bearbeitung erhalten. Es scheint, dass es einige Probleme gibt. Wenn es sich um einen physischen Standort handelt, sollte er nicht an einer Straße liegen, sondern in einem Gebäude.

Ich werde das Problem beheben, aber Sie sollten den Standort an der richtigen Stelle bearbeiten.

Dennis Raylin Chen
Data Working Group
data@osmfoundation.org
[Ticket#2024102310000081]
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158200635
sus242424 (2024-10-24 22:53:46+00:00): It's just all Spam. We don't have an adress, the entry is without an attribute (at least you could use "company office" as attribute) and we have the false position. I had to delete most of the entries. Please stop it.
---
Es ist einfach alles Spam. Wir haben keine Adresse, der Eintrag ist ohne Attribut (zumindest könnte man "Firmenbüro" als Attribut verwenden) und wir haben die falsche Position. Ich musste die meisten der Einträge löschen. Bitte lasst das.
sus242424 (2024-10-24 22:56:16+00:00): office=surveyor would be correct attribute so please just type in "surveyor" in the big search field after adding the new point
empty_child (2024-10-22 10:56:57+00:00): Please, don't mention NAPR publicly. It's a stop word in the local *kinky* OSM party ;)
ffmp (2024-10-23 06:11:33+00:00): 1. I used NAPR data only for river names, is it prohibited? If yes, what source must be used as source of truth in such case?

2. BTW, seems, some data from NAPR available under GPL: https://geonetwork.napr.gov.ge/geonetwork/srv/v2/api-docs. Don't know what exactly available via this API.

3. Some data, available via maps.gov.ge, also available via OpenAerialMap: https://map.openaerialmap.org/#/45.482003688812256,41.918022134043206,15/user/6512afa748232300010f60ce?_k=lipiwi This is exactly same images - positions of moving cars are same.
empty_child (2024-10-23 09:36:25+00:00): Simply don't mention NAPR. Using their data is in the gray zone, we tried to request explicit allowance for using in the mapping, but without any result
citrula (2024-10-22 21:27:40+00:00): I have reverted this edit because this business doesn't have an on-the-ground presence - let me know if you have any questions.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158229898
OSM_RogerWilco (2024-10-22 20:28:00+00:00): Hallo Marco Mansfeld,
herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap!

Ich vermute, dass dies ein kleiner Halloween-Scherz sein soll? Bitte beachte, dass OSM der falsche Ort dafür ist.

Viele Grüße
Roger Wilco
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-18 04:51:04+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165095601
Langlaeufer (2024-10-25 15:03:53+00:00): Ich hab mal die Straße aufgeteilt. Teile davon haben nämlich einen Gehweg. Kannst du ja nochmal kontrolieren.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158201304
JeroenHoek (2024-10-22 09:18:29+00:00): Let ook even op de short-name. Ze hanteren You-Yi (koppelstreepje) op de gevel.
Tjuro (2024-10-22 10:44:52+00:00): Ah Bedankt Jeroen, ik heb het aangepast
kuhni74 (2024-10-22 13:55:26+00:00): eine klassische Scheune ist es aber auch nicht
TrickyFoxy (2024-10-22 22:40:02+00:00): Вы хотите показать, что часть здания оставили? Или что уже новое построили?
eggie (2024-10-22 10:30:42+00:00): Dag markabdelhamid,

Dit is helaas niet correct. Er zijn al adresnodes. Svp geen adres toevoegen aan een gebouwomtrek.
Ik heb het adres verwijderd.

MVG
eggie
Gwenj (2024-10-22 17:24:43+00:00): Bonjour,
Je vois que vous avez passé la portion modifié de l’av. Rockefeller en piste cyclable.
De ce que j’ai vu sur place, il y a seulement un sens interdit, la situation n’est pas claire dans le sens de la montée et l’accès des riverains à leurs habitations pose question quand au statut de la rue.
À moins que le statut soit précisé dans un texte réglementaire (ce n’est pas le cas de l’arrêté affiché sur place), il me semble prématuré de la classer en piste cyclable.
le_geo_urb (2024-10-22 19:25:12+00:00): Voici ma source. des vélos sont dessiné sur la chaussée de la rue barrée : https://api.mobilites.grandlyon.com/fileadmin/user_upload/media/PDF/Perturbations/_lettre_info_travaux/202410_Metropole_VL12_Rockefeller_Exp%C3%A9.pdf
Gwenj (2024-10-22 19:41:12+00:00): Vous souvenez-vous où sont les pictogrammes ? Ce soir, je n’ai vu que les ellipses « 50 ».
Je suis toujours sceptique sur le statut de la route à cause des accès riverains, incompatibles avec celui de piste cyclable.
On aura peut-être du nouveau à la fin des travaux, programmés vendredi 25 octobre par l’arrêté temporaire M 2024 C 10303 ME/AF.
Vinber-Pro (2025-04-16 13:54:17+00:00): salut,
tu as créé un doublon de ceci non ?

bises au passage
ChillyDL (2024-10-26 07:22:54+00:00): Hallo mrsuspect, danke fürs Einfügen der Start- und Landeplätze! Sie müssten aber bitte als leisure=pit mit sport=free_flying eingetragen werden, nicht wie hier als shop=free_flying, das wäre ein Geschäft.
Das Tagging-Schema findest du hier:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:sport%3Dfree_flying
mrsuspect (2024-10-26 10:18:50+00:00): Vielen Dank für den Hinweis, da hast du völlig recht. Ich füge die POIs über OSMand ein, leider sind hier einige Attribute bei der Editierung gar nicht einsehbar (z.b. shop) - ich werde aber versuchen darauf zu achten es korrekt einzustellen. Danke nochmal.
EneaSuper (2024-11-05 10:11:16+00:00): Hi rskedgell, according to this video this acre is part of the US territory, can you confirm this?

https://youtu.be/1d5L0vn8ezw
JassKurn (2024-11-05 14:37:11+00:00): EneaSuper, The land is owned by the  USA (US Government), but is not US territory. 

The video is wrong, and is part of a growing problem Youtube has with fake information videos. The voice is AI generated.
EneaSuper (2024-11-05 14:45:59+00:00): I thought it was bullshit. Thanks a lot for the clarification ❤️
falcon2 (2025-11-08 17:22:33+00:00): Possibly this should be reverted. Here's a not AI slop video that seems decently researched: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iQOZUaSoy90
rskedgell (2025-11-08 22:42:01+00:00): The addr:* tags refer to the *actual* address of the object, not that of its owner or operator. There is the abandoned contact:addr:*

Feel free to add those tags, together with appropriate wikidata links, if you have an OSM-compatible source for the information.
rskedgell (2025-11-08 22:59:35+00:00): Also, please note  that I attempted to contact the user who added the incorrect address and waited 3 weeks for a response before reverting the changeset.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157041429
Patchanka (2026-05-19 09:27:47+00:00): bonjour @MaxR_6429

est-ce vraiment ici le Camping Pont Lauguère ?
Il semble mappé un peu plus loin...
Voir cette note
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5299659
Plaintelive (2024-10-23 21:59:21+00:00): Via Guglielmo Marconi dovrebbe essere una strada (highway=residential) non un percorso pedonale come hai taggato tu (highway=footway)
citrula (2024-10-22 21:31:50+00:00): Welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contribution. I have corrected a couple of your changes, but otherwise it looks good! Road names should use the fully unabbreviated form, if possible.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158204086
NorthCrab_upload (2024-10-22 10:21:04+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10837819235
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1327202411

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eggie (2024-10-22 12:18:25+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Станіслав Шереда (2024-11-08 02:42:55+00:00): Uz
Baloo Uriza (2025-09-10 13:08:36+00:00): It's best to draw streets in segments that match where street names are likely to change, rather than having multiple streets as part of a single segment.  This will take working knowledge of how street names work in the US.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158205452
sarya_Lyft (2025-09-12 09:31:14+00:00): Hi Baloo Uriza,

Thank you very much for explaining why you split the roads that I added. We will update our best practices mapping with these kinds of examples.

Best regards, Surander
Plaintelive (2024-10-23 22:03:16+00:00): Per parcheggi sotterranei sarebbe ottimale mappare anche l'ingresso con amenity=parking_entrance + parking=underground (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:parking%3Dunderground)
RobertTBS (2024-10-31 04:06:40+00:00): The reason Iowa's townships are not mapped is that they are not their own governments, but instead are classified as subordinate agencies of county governments, therefor making it part of the local county and not a separate entity.
whammo (2024-11-02 21:29:04+00:00): Hi Robert, my reading of the OSM wiki guidance on US admin boundaries suggests that townships are fair game to map. And some township boundaries predate me (see https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1Tzn), so I think it's more a matter of them being a pain in the butt to create. Happy to discuss further.
kuhni74 (2024-10-22 13:52:45+00:00): danke!
Gregory Peony (2024-10-24 23:03:03+00:00): Please square your footprints if a building's walls form right angles. The feature I flagged consists of a surplus node. Overall this is a good contribution; all features are valid. 

Zooming out can help you see the shape and orientation of features, then zoom in to draw the feature accurately. If you want to you can use mapbox imagery in this area (either to trace or as a supporting reference) by offseting it to allign with the features you've already mapped, since the resolution is greater. 

I encourage you to attend this online event if you'd like to interact with other mappers. https://osmcal.org/event/2725/ or search for it through OSMCal
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158206496
Littlebtc (2024-10-22 11:17:35+00:00): Commented on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158180119
NieWnen (2025-07-27 17:25:25+00:00): Proszę zapoznaj się z https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Rowery#Drogi_dla_pieszych_i_rower%C3%B3w

Takie tagowanie CPRów jest niepoprawne.
Dodatkowo należy je łączyć (przecinać) wspólnym węzłem z drogami, wiszące są do niczego nieprzydatne – nawigacja nie zadziała.
MarcoR (2024-10-23 13:15:01+00:00): manca il tipo di PDI, che nel caso specifico sembrerebbe un'azienda di informatica? (vedi https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Tag:office%3Dit per maggiori info)
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-17 03:04:36+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165051935
MarcoR (2024-10-23 13:22:23+00:00): Si tratta dell'abitazione privata di una persona? In tal caso bisognerebbe rimuoverla e aggiungere la posizione dell'ufficio o del luogo, se esiste ed è unico, dove avvengono le cerimonie.

Inoltre manca il tipo di PDI; se le cerimonie prevalenti sono quelle di tipo funebre potresti usare amenity=funeral_hall (vedi https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dfuneral_hall)
Sakari_N (2024-10-22 16:38:40+00:00): Hello Helmchen42!

Please do use meaningful changeset comments. Leaving changeset comment field empty does not help other mappers understand what you are doing.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
eggie (2024-10-22 12:23:39+00:00): Dag OpenSander..  Svp geen adresnodes aanpassen. Nu komt nr 58 2x voor in de data. 
Wanneer iets niet klopt kun je een terugmelding doen bij het Kadaster.
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/?searchQuery=Lange+Jufferstraat+58&objectId=0344200000068057&theme=BRT+Achtergrond&geometry.x=137073.31949999998&geometry.y=456302.6185&zoomlevel=15

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-10-22 12:24:49+00:00): reverted by changeset #158209338
Rodrigo Rega (2024-10-22 16:22:45+00:00): Hola, en esta edición se borraron partes de edificio que vienen de importación de Catastro, perdiendo así detalle en el edificio. ¿Podrías indicar la razón?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158207463
chaunceyp09 (2024-10-22 13:29:31+00:00): remove this changes.
GerdP (2024-10-23 08:07:25+00:00): Korrektur Copy+Paste Fehler: Radtour am 20.10.2024
Rodrigo Rega (2024-10-22 16:20:05+00:00): Hola.

El comentario de este conjunto de cambios no es lo suficientemente descriptivo para que el resto de usuarios se hagan una idea de cuáles han sido los elementos que se han editado. Por favor, consulta la siguiente página para saber como hacer comentarios que faciliten el trabajo de revisión de ediciones: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenos_comentarios_en_conjuntos_de_cambios

Gracias por tus aportes a OpenStreetMap.

Un saludo.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158208319
pancitpigeon (2024-10-22 18:40:53+00:00): Could you please explain why you have removed this breakwater? The tagging seemed fine to me as it followed the description of this tag at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man%20made=breakwater?uselang=en-GB prior to removal
JassKurn (2024-10-25 14:44:28+00:00): I've reverted this in changeset 158341088

The removal of the breakwater makes no mapping sense, I am concerned user is a bot, and there has been no response to the changeset comment.
evdence (2024-10-23 15:10:02+00:00): Hi there!
I noticed that your recent changeset didn't include a comment. Adding comments is really important because it helps the community understand the changes you've made. When we share what we've done, it fosters collaboration and makes it easier for others to follow the evolution of the map. Please consider adding a brief note in your future edits.
Thanks!

Sveiki!
Pastebėjau, kad jūsų neseniai atliktame pakeitime nebuvo komentaro. Pridėti komentarus yra labai svarbu, nes tai padeda bendruomenei suprasti, kokius pakeitimus atlikote. Dalindamiesi tuo, ką padarėte, skatiname bendradarbiavimą ir palengviname kitiems žmonėms sekti žemėlapio vystymąsi. Prašome ateityje pridėti trumpą pastabą prie savo redagavimų.
Ačiū!
無限の刃 (2024-10-22 12:12:37+00:00): 横須賀市立の幼稚園と小中高学校を全て編集。情報源としての航空写真と地図に国土地理院標準地図とBingを使用。名称を「横須賀市立」から始まる表記に統一。平仮名名称は横須賀市役所ウェブページ https://www.city.yokosuka.kanagawa.jp/8110/siritugakkouitiranhyou.html による。
Tomas_J (2024-12-21 08:33:58+00:00): Zdravim, proč jsi kemp smazal? Už na místě neni?
Eng: Hi, why did you deleted the camp? It is not visible on the site already?
Tomas_J (2024-12-21 08:46:11+00:00): V 10/2024 jsi smazal asi 10 kempu bez uvedení relevantního důvodu. Místa v terénu existuji. Vrať, prosím, všechno do původního stavu.  
ENG: You gave deleted cca 10 camps in 10/2024. The places still exist in the reality.  Return, please, everything as it was in the map before.
user_22095758 (2024-12-21 10:18:13+00:00): Ahoj,mista jsem smazal úmyslně a nehodlám to vrátit do původního stavu.Toto nejsou žádný zapráskaný kempy na Vltavě,ale jsou to trampský campy a jako takový si vyžadují respekt a nikdo nemá sebemenší zajem tyto místa zveřejňovat,jen pitomci a neználkové a dement Kulbába Březina, co netuší,co to  vlastně tramping je a jakou má vlastně historií a filozofii.Diky za pochopení .
petr Horáci
JassKurn (2024-10-28 14:09:53+00:00): Reverted in changeset 158458035
Part of group of changesets from new user, made over two days, that introduce errors. coastline boat has failed to respond to requests to explain edits.
Jakka (2024-10-23 08:22:40+00:00): Dit is een virtuele locatie, gebruikers gaan deze dus onnodig gaan zoeken en nooit vinden.
Graag op de echte locatie of verwijderen.
Rodrigo Rega (2024-10-22 16:19:17+00:00): Hola.

El comentario de este conjunto de cambios no es lo suficientemente descriptivo para que el resto de usuarios se hagan una idea de cuáles han sido los elementos que se han editado. Por favor, consulta la siguiente página para saber como hacer comentarios que faciliten el trabajo de revisión de ediciones: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenos_comentarios_en_conjuntos_de_cambios

Gracias por tus aportes a OpenStreetMap.

Un saludo.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158209136
JassKurn (2024-10-28 14:24:46+00:00): Reverted in changeset 158458721
This is one of group of changesets from new account, made over two days, that introduce errors. coastlinebot has failed to respond to requests to explain edits.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-06 01:22:07+00:00): Cleaned up SEO spam tags for Two Men and a Truck POI in changeset 183719157

https://osm.org/changeset/183719157
eggie (2024-10-22 13:20:15+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-10-22 13:22:40+00:00): Dag Flow.. Denk dat iets niet helemaal is goed gegaan.
Zie https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=158209275
Ik zal de overkapping herstellen.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-10-22 13:26:33+00:00): Je kunt nog even checken of de  muurschildering op de juiste plaats zit. Let wel op Deze zit als een node vast aan het gebouw.
MVG
eggie
JassKurn (2024-10-28 14:30:08+00:00): Reverted in changeset 158458932
This is one of group of changesets from new account, made over two days, that introduce errors. coastlinebot has failed to respond to requests to explain edits.
JassKurn (2024-10-28 14:34:46+00:00): Reverted in changeset 158459108
This is one of group of changesets from new account, made over two days, that introduce errors. coastlinebot has failed to respond to requests to explain edits.
Tomas_J (2024-12-21 08:42:45+00:00): Zdravim, proč jsi kemp smazal? Už na místě neni?
Eng: Hi, why did you deleted the camp? It is not visible on the site already?
JassKurn (2024-10-28 14:37:36+00:00): Reverted in changeset 158209698
This is one of group of changesets from new account, made over two days, that introduce errors. coastlinebot has failed to respond to requests to explain edits.
evdence (2024-10-23 15:09:32+00:00): Hi there! 
I noticed that your recent changeset didn't include a comment. Adding comments is really important because it helps the community understand the changes you've made. When we share what we've done, it fosters collaboration and makes it easier for others to follow the evolution of the map. Please consider adding a brief note in your future edits.
Thanks!

Sveiki! 
Pastebėjau, kad jūsų neseniai atliktame pakeitime nebuvo komentaro. Pridėti komentarus yra labai svarbu, nes tai padeda bendruomenei suprasti, kokius pakeitimus atlikote. Dalindamiesi tuo, ką padarėte, skatiname bendradarbiavimą ir palengviname kitiems žmonėms sekti žemėlapio vystymąsi. Prašome ateityje pridėti trumpą pastabą prie savo redagavimų.
Ačiū!
JassKurn (2024-10-28 14:42:41+00:00): Reverted in changeset 158459423
This is one of group of changesets from new account, made over two days, that introduce errors. coastlinebot has failed to respond to requests to explain edits.
Tomas_J (2024-12-21 08:41:55+00:00): Zdravim, proč jsi kemp smazal? Už na místě neni?
Eng: Hi, why did you deleted the camp? It is not visible on the site already?
user_22095758 (2024-12-21 10:18:40+00:00): Ahoj,mista jsem smazal úmyslně a nehodlám to vrátit do původního stavu.Toto nejsou žádný zapráskaný kempy na Vltavě,ale jsou to trampský campy a jako takový si vyžadují respekt a nikdo taková místa zveřejňovat nechce,jen pitomci a neználkové, co netuší,co je vlastně tramping je a jakou má vlastně historií a filozofii.Diky za pochopení .
petr Hopáci
Tomas_J (2024-12-21 15:37:37+00:00): Zda je kemp na Vltavě nebo v lese je jedno.  Kemp v reálu existuje, je přístupný a v OSM byl správně otagovany. Nevidím důvod proč by v mapě být nemohl.  Pokud je kemp soukromý, je možné přidat tag access=private. Mazání není správný přístup. 
ENG: It doesn't matter whether the campsite is on the Vltava River or in the forest. The campsite exists in reality, is accessible and was correctly tagged in OSM. I don't see any reason why it couldn't be on the map. If the campsite is private, it is possible to add the tag access=private. Deleting is not the right approach.
user_22095758 (2024-12-21 15:58:41+00:00): Rozumím, chápu tvuj pohled,prosim o pochopení toho našeho,trampského.Proste není správné na žádné mapě zobrazovat mista,ktera maji i větší rozměr než jen to, že je tam ohniště a lavička.Nektera mista fungují 60 i 80 let právě proto, že žádný bezmozek ty místa nezveřejnil.Diky za pochopení a úplné vymazání mist z OSM.Petr