piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
foreigner037 (2023-01-24 12:40:16+00:00): Здравей,

Както е споменато тук (която страница също поддържам активно), правилата са по-скоро за удобство и отклонения от тях не са изключени. Даже вече има доста такива, основно заради алгоритъма за рутиране и отбелязване на улици в градовете.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bg:WikiProject_Bulgaria/%D0%9F%D1%8A%D1%82%D0%BD%D0%B0_%D0%BC%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B6%D0%B0

Скоростни пътища, както са определени в закона, все още няма в България. За сметка на това има доста отсечки, маркирани с highway=trunk. Такива са СОП, обхода на Монтана, Бургас - Созопол, Варна - Златни Пясъци, Пловдив - Асеновград, Димитровград - Хасково и тн.
stephan75 (2023-01-02 16:50:38+00:00): Hallo Garmin-User,

du hast nach der Eingemeindung von Zschaitz-Ottewig die Relation Nummer 415412 so abgeändert, dass was:admin_level = 8 und was:boundary = administrative da drinne steht. 

Ich hatte früher bei Eingemeindungen es so gehandhabt, dass ich für die Grenzrelation den admin_level von 8 auf 9 angehoben habe, und boundary=administrative so gelassen habe. Dann stellt die Relation halt ein Ortsteil der großeren Gemeinde dar. Meinst du das wäre hier auch denkbar?
user_177389 (2023-01-02 17:16:09+00:00): Hallo stephan75,

sowas wäre denkbar. Allerdings würde ich den admin_level nicht pauschal auf 9 setzen. Da gibt es noch mehr zu beachten, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Grenze#Innerkommunal_%E2%80%93_admin_level=9%E2%80%9311
Zudem wäre das end_date-Tag irgendwie irritierend.

Beste Grüße,  
Mario
stephan75 (2023-01-03 20:50:57+00:00): Ja ... Admin_level könnte auch anders als 9 werden. Dann in der Tat aber ohne end_date, und wenn es sich um eine klassische Eingemeindung handelt, dann hat Zschaitz-Ottewig auch keinen de:amtlicher_gemeindeschluessel=... mehr, diesen somit mit was: oder old_davor umbenennen, denke ich. Analog dazu auch den Key von de:regionalschluessel umbenennen?
user_177389 (2023-01-04 03:47:09+00:00): Präfix "old_" würde ich nur verwenden, wenn ein davon abweichender aktueller Wert eingetragen ist. Ansonsten lieber "was:" davor, es interpretiert sich besser, wenn die Schlüsselpaare einheitlich sind.
Langlaeufer (2024-09-25 11:37:06+00:00): Hi, wurde der Weg zurückgebaut, oder wie muss ihc ds verstehen?
Xvtn (2023-01-03 16:53:18+00:00): What's your source for this data? Are you sure this is correct?
MountainCitadel (2023-01-03 23:07:03+00:00): Hi Xvtn,
Thanks for reaching out. "currency:XBT" is a newer tag that covers bitcoin, bitcoin lightning and NFC payments.  

"payment:bitcoin" is a legacy tag that that still works, but a little out-of-date with the advancement of the bitcoin protocol. More information here:  https://github.com/teambtcmap/btcmap-data/wiki/Tagging-Instructions#shadowy-supertaggers
Xvtn (2023-01-03 23:10:37+00:00): Oh, I hadn't noticed that payment:bitcoin=yes was already present here. I wondered if you were going around adding XBT to random nodes across the country! Thanks for the explanation.
MountainCitadel (2023-01-03 23:18:50+00:00): payment:bitcoin=yes is fine, but the currency:XBT tag is more accurate and preferable.  I try to update them when I get a chance.  Thanks for checking!
NorthCrab (2023-01-01 20:35:40+00:00): Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Samo nadanie nazwy nie jest wystarczające do zmapowania punktu. Należy wybrać też kategorię do jakiej przynależy punkt.

Może po prostu Yoga Studio?
https://i.imgur.com/9nJvhd2.png

Pozdrawiam!
Robert Laska (2023-01-01 20:48:48+00:00): Dziękuje za pomoc ;-)
woodpeck_repair (2023-01-01 20:14:26+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 129760633, 129780166, 129786514.
jptolosa (2023-07-27 23:31:12+00:00): Hola, en esta edición y otras más recientes dentro de Santiago se ha cambiado la clasificación de varias calles desde "residential" a living_street. Sin embargo la mayoría de ellas no reunen las condiciones para ser un living_street. Son calles urbanas como cualquier otra.
Saludos.
NorthCrab (2023-01-01 20:40:02+00:00): Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Dzięki za dodanie AED, pozwoliłem sobie uprościć tą lokalizację ponieważ była ona trochę przydługa :P Usunąłem adres ponieważ ten jest umieszczony obok budynku oraz dokładny model wozu ponieważ uważam że taki szczegół utrudnia przeczytanie/zrozumienie tekstu a w przypadku zagrożenia nie będzie on mieć znaczenia.

Pozdrawiam!
gscholz (2023-01-06 07:32:21+00:00): Hi Heterodyne,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=10.34161&lat=5.64599&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=130763908

This kind of errors irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps. Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2023-01-08 08:19:23+00:00): Hi Heterodyne, 
this error still exist, can I get your feedback here?
Guido
Heterodyne (2023-01-08 14:59:29+00:00): I have made the correction.
But I would like to say this error was not from my end. Because I do not remember creating any feature of that magnitude this year, particularly roads, because the task I am mapping is majorly for buildings.
Dodko (2023-01-02 18:53:26+00:00): Pri kopírovaní garáže netreba kopírovať aj jej adresu. Dali ste rovnakú.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1126364401/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1126364402/history
Frans S (2023-01-12 11:25:57+00:00): Hello.
 thanks for mapping on this project. I noticed that you tagged paths/roads in rural area as tracks. Please use the correct tag. Track is only to be used as access to farmland. Woods or riversides. See this wiki
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/East_Africa_Tagging_Guidelines

Also keep track of the width of a path to decide if it should be tagged as path or road

Best regards
highflyer74 (2023-01-02 12:31:54+00:00): Moin!

Beim Hinzufügen der Parkplätze und anderer Flächen sind SEHR viele Geometriefehler entstanden:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=7.00104&lat=51.43306&zoom=18&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=long_ways%2Cways_with_long_segments%2Clong_segments%2Cself_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way%2Clong_ways%2Cways_with_long_segments%2Clong_segments%2Cself_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

(obiges ist nur noch einige Stunden sichtbar, da ich die Fehler gleich repariere)

Eigentlich sollte JOSM dir dies auch als Fehler anzeigen. Insofern wäre es gut, wenn du dir diese Meldungen noch einmal anschaust, bevor du die Daten hochlädst.

Generell:

- versuche, Überlappungen zu vermeiden.

- ein Stellplatz sollte aus vier Nodes bestehen, mehr sind nicht notwendig.

- es gibt für JOSM entsprechende Tools, um viele gleich große Flächen zu erzeugen. Dies verbessert die Qualität der Geometrien.

- achte darauf, ob Nodes miteinander verbunden sind, oder nicht, und ob sie es sein sollten, oder nicht.

Wenn du noch Fragen hast, melde dich gern!
thschick (2023-01-04 09:48:08+00:00): Hallo highflyer74,

danke für den Hinweis. Das ist mir in der Tat in JOSM nicht aufgefallen. Ich habe an anderen Stellen gute Erfahrungen mit dem Gridify-Plugin gemacht. Hier (und an anderen Stellen, wo Parkplätze in Kurven liegen o.ä.) habe ich z.T. auch mit duplizierten und anschließend gedrehten Flächen gearbeitet und versucht, diese dann massenweise mit den entsprechenden Linien zu verknüpfen. Das hat wohl nicht wirklich geklappt. Ich schaue mir daher die ähnlichen Fälle daher auch lieber nochmal an. 

Danke, dass du hier schon aufgeräumt hast!
Mapillox (2023-01-02 00:21:52+00:00): Why did you add the housenumber to the street name in the PHP Restaurant Node?
CloCkWeRX (2023-01-03 05:05:24+00:00): Typo in a few of these - cycleway:left=lane`

Visible via https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?schema=50&error=165672238

Might be a street complete bug?
kapazao (2023-01-16 18:25:16+00:00): Hola, ¿podrías explicar por qué te estás cargando todos los caminos que pasan por cortafuegos y los estás sustituyendo por cortafuegos? ¿Acaso no hay ningún camino y es solo cortafuegos?
Por otra parte los cortafuegos se ponen entre árboles, no al lado de una carretera y no deberían ir unidos a nada con lo que no tienen relación.
Por favor revisa esto y corrije lo necesario.
Un saludo y gracias por tus contribuciones.
Javier Boy (2023-01-16 19:05:08+00:00): Hola buenas tardes,

He estado añadiendo muchos recorridos que faltaban en la zona para ser recorridos en bicicleta. Precisamente respecto a los cortafuegos los modifiqué con la idea que al unirlo a otros senderos asemejaría más a la realidad la edición de rutas que permite los navegadores (para que pueda dar un % real del tipo de sendero). Atendiendo a tu comentario, entiendo que los cortafuegos deben ser entidades independientes a otros senderos en el mapa. ¿Puedes confirmarlo?

Añado una aclaración (por si no eres de la zona), la gran mayoría de los cortafuegos de esta zona no son transitables salvo que haya llovido recientemente o se tenga un vehículo muy capaz. ¿Afectaría esto a la edición del cortafuegos?

Un saludo y gracias por tus comentarios.
kapazao (2023-01-16 19:16:22+00:00): Hola, los cortafuegos se deben poner independientes de cualquier otro objeto, lo más centrados posible a su ancho, y como digo se ponen para cortar bosque, no en sitios donde se separa el bosque de la carretera. Si por donde pasa el cortafuegos además va alguna vía, esta debe ser otro elemento a parte.
Si conoces la zona y estás seguro de que por ahí no hay caminos perfecto. Parece que los añadieron hace tiempo sin mucho conocimiento, basándose en imágenes por satélite.
Es necesario que revises la zona, ya que hay algunos cortafuegos incorrectos y uniones de vías a estos o que se han desconectado de otras vías, y ahora se perdería el ruteamiento.

Gracias por la respuesta, un saludo
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130764953
gabriele_sani (2023-10-05 11:59:03+00:00): Sono dell'idea che la strada che collega Eremo e Monastero fosse correttamente indicata come strada forestale, in quanto c'e' proprio il cartello lato Eremo che la indica come tale
LorenzoPesci (2023-10-05 13:09:06+00:00): La definizione di forestale nel cartello non coincide con quella della wiki: "track: Strade per uso agricolo, ... forestali che NON forniscono connettività" mentre in questo caso la funzione di collegamento è evidente.
gabriele_sani (2023-10-05 13:31:39+00:00): Ok, puo' aver senso allora mettere "minore/non classificata" invece che di servizio?
LorenzoPesci (2023-10-05 14:59:08+00:00): Sì, può essere unclassified (roads used only for local traffic)
Ho anche trovato questo sulla wiki: In rural contexts, narrow paved roads with only private access for motorcars (maybe public access for agricultural motor-vehicles, cyclists and pedestrians) should be tagged as highway=service and motorcar=private.
Scegli tu, ciao
Strubbl (2023-01-03 15:49:23+00:00): Hallo Bernhard, danke für deine Aktualisierung. In Zukunft bitte Geschäfte, die nicht mehr existieren, nicht einfach löschen. Nutze bitte den disused-Lifecycle-Prefix dafür. Mehr Infos dazu im Wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

Viele Grüße
Sven
Bernhard_007 (2023-01-03 16:11:03+00:00): Vielen Dank für die Info Sven!
Werde ich in Zukunft machen.
Schöne Grüße
Bernhard
Strubbl (2023-01-03 16:39:18+00:00): Vielen Dank und weiter viel Spaß beim Kartieren
Mashin (2023-01-02 11:43:36+00:00): Hi,
though I don't see a gate nor any no-trespassing signs. If there are no physical or legal restrictions to access the road then we should not put access=private tag on the road. But you can use ownership=private to indicate private ownership instead.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Dprivate
fusfeld (2023-01-02 16:39:00+00:00): Further information, the road is mostly in Bloomfield CT, only a small part crosses into West Hartford. The Bloomfield town map has Cigna Rd listed as Private
eggie (2023-01-02 08:11:23+00:00): Dag ashu   Kijk even hier svp
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dfitness_station

MVG
eggie
ashutoshb (2023-01-02 09:29:34+00:00): Thanks for the heads-up and the fix. Fitness station is a better description indeed.
eggie (2023-01-02 09:57:55+00:00): No problem... enjoy mapping
eggie
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-18 15:18:02+00:00): Thank you for mapping. The mapping looks great and also the changeset comment. Thanks for adding up the highway.  Happy Mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130766068
Marek-M (2023-01-02 12:15:48+00:00): Cześć, przy wprowadzaniu danych zwracaj uwagę na wszystkie aktualizowane wartości - tutaj np. zmieniłeś 
addr:city=Kartuzy na addr:city=KARTUZY
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-13 10:29:04+00:00): Thank you for mapping. The mapping looks great and also the changeset comment. Happy Mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130766107
eggie (2023-01-02 07:56:37+00:00): Welkom bij OSM..

Zou  Hét tennisveld naast dé bar van hét CAVV  werkelijk de naam zijn van de tennisbanen?

MVG
eggie
D'n Dave (2023-01-02 10:02:32+00:00): Ja, source; ik woon hier op de campus, ben lid van het CAVV en ik ben student aan de KLM Flight Academy
eggie (2023-01-02 10:07:25+00:00): Oke....  Heb al meer voor buitenstaanders 'merkwaardige' namen zien verschijnen.
Wanneer het geen officiële namen zijn dan kun je loc_name gebruiken=
Namen die alleen door buurtbewoners worden gebruikt, maar niet officieel worden in OSM.

Heeft iets nog een andere naam dan alt_name= naast de officiële naam gebruiken zoals bij Alpha. 
Veel plezier met mappen
eggie
bxl-forever (2023-01-02 00:43:58+00:00): Hello,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1126375955 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1126375954 do not really qualify as bicycle_parking amenities.

They are two small lines of docks for the Villo! station.  The Villo! station is already on the map, we should not add areas along with it.  Otherwise, we are creating a misleading map: OSM tells me there is a place where I can park my bicycle… and when I come there I find out it’s exclusively for Villo! bicycles.
eggie (2023-01-02 07:58:25+00:00): Dag Dave,
Waarom name=Nato hier?
Wat zit hier dan van de NATO?

MVG
eggie
D'n Dave (2023-01-02 09:18:30+00:00): Het heeft niks te maken met de Noord-Atlantische Verdragsorganisatie, echter is het de benaming voor de groep studenten binnen de KLM Flight Academy die in gebouw ALPHA wonen (Waaronder ik).
eggie (2023-01-02 09:57:04+00:00): Oke...  Kijk dan even in de wiki welke tag daar nog meer bij hoort. Schiet me even niet te binnen. 
Een name= zie je niet in OSM op de kaart.
Mapse
eggie
eggie (2023-01-02 10:01:27+00:00): Zie hier 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:club

club=student (rendert niet) 
dan toevoegen 
amenity=community_centre

Mapse
eggie
eggie (2023-01-02 10:03:48+00:00): Hoewel wonen zie ik nu....  
In dat geval toch weer anders..
Het gebouw heeft al een naam..Alpha

Wanneer dat nu NATO is dan zou je het kunnen vervangen.
Als het een niet officiële naam is kun je toevoegen alt_name=

Dan staat het toch in de data van OSM.

MVG
eggie
Diacritic (2023-01-02 01:57:54+00:00): Hi Skipperoo. In this section of Princes Highway, the roads are known as Lonsdale Street.

According to the Australian Tagging Guidelines (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Roads#Dual_Road_Naming), it's best to use the local name (as used for addressing) as the primary name, and put the larger name as the Alternate name
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130766812
Diacritic (2023-01-02 02:07:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 130769621.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130766812
Diacritic (2023-01-02 02:07:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 130769621.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130766852
Diacritic (2023-01-02 02:07:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 130769621.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130766876
felipeeugenio (2023-01-02 21:50:24+00:00): Erick; You basically made a mistake in every categorization of the streets you added. Please take a look at the wiki once in a while
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130766898
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-01-02 22:40:49+00:00): I re-added it as it was before, I didn't change the type of street, and they do exist, as you can see in the Maxar layer and you just edited it yourself and left it there in the same place like this: https://www.openstreetmap .org/way/156860924 . If it didn't exist you would have deleted it. User HappyHollyDino had deleted it over a month ago and the local community had done nothing. I receive feeds of suspicious edits from new users across Latin America and will continue to check these cases.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-01-02 22:43:16+00:00): But it will be very good if you can act on these cases before me. I'll have less work and you'll probably know better how to handle it. I use this service: http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
felipeeugenio (2023-01-02 23:35:45+00:00): The changeset says nothing about what you are explaining now.
But even so, you should check what you are adding.
Diacritic (2023-01-02 02:07:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 130769621.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130766924
Diacritic (2023-01-02 02:07:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 130769621.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130766937
Diacritic (2023-01-02 02:07:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 130769621.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130766963
Diacritic (2023-01-02 01:59:40+00:00): Hi Skipperoo. In this section of Princes Highway, the roads are also known as Dandenong Road. According to the Australian Tagging Guidelines (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Roads#Dual_Road_Naming), it's best to use the local name (as used for addressing) as the primary name, and put the larger name as the Alternate name.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130766994
Diacritic (2023-01-02 02:08:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 130769621.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130766994
Diacritic (2023-01-02 02:08:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 130769621.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130767002
Diacritic (2023-01-02 02:08:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 130769621.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130767057
Diacritic (2023-01-02 02:08:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 130769621.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130767158
Tatfahren (2023-01-02 16:42:18+00:00): Auch hier möchte ich nochmal was dazu schreiben, es geht Speziell um die von dir eingetragenen "Reihenhäuser" (z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/700361972).

Der entsprechenden tag "building=terrace" wird für "Eine lange Reihe aus ähnlichen Einfamilienhäusern" verwendet, Das sind "buildings" die mehrere Zusammenhängende Einfamilienhäuser umfassen, wenn du solche findest, solltest du aber einen Note erstellen, da diese Heutzutage als Einzelne Gebäude erfasst werden. Für ein Einzelnes Reihenhaus nutze bitte die Antwort: "Haus", "nicht freistehendes Einfamilienhaus, z.B. einzelnes Reihenhaus". Das wird auch verwendet wenn das angrenzende gebäude ein Mehrfamilienhaus ist.

Die dort von dir eingetragenen Gebäude teilen sich wohl jeweils die Mittelwand, womit sie in den allermeisten fällen ein building=semidetached_house "Doppelhaus (-hälfte)" sind. So trage ich diese dann auch gleich noch ein.

Vieleicht hast du lust demnächst nochmal dort vorbeizugehen, Ich trage gerade die dort neu erbauten Gebäude ein, bei welchen die Adresse leider (noch) nicht in den Amtlichen Karten vorhanden ist, weshalb diese vor Ort erfasst werden müssten. 

Danke, Tatfahren.
Diacritic (2023-01-02 02:08:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 130769621.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130767242
CoyKoi (2023-01-02 00:14:37+00:00): Hi 99 welcome to OSM editing and thanks for your contributions! One tip when drawing buildings: to get nice square angles you can use the keyboard shortcut 'Q' which will snap the corners to 90 degrees. Cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130767250
Diacritic (2023-01-02 02:08:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 130769621.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130767321
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-18 02:11:04+00:00): Thank you for mapping and updating the fictitious information. Much appreciated. Happy Mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130767351
Diacritic (2023-01-02 02:08:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 130769621.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130767366
antqweEoNw_at (2023-01-02 01:23:34+00:00): 안녕하세요 
새로운 등산로를 추가하실때는 꼭 관계를 추가해 주세요.
몇몇 등산로는 출입이 제한된 구간이 있습니다. 이점 참고해 주시기 바랍니다.
morago (2023-01-02 04:42:37+00:00): 출입 제한 구간은 제가 몰랐던 부분이네요. 정보 감사합니다. 
그리고, 한가지 궁금한게 양주 불곡산에 관계를 설정해 놓으신 이유가 특별히 있는지 궁금합니다.
antqweEoNw_at (2023-01-02 05:25:17+00:00): 관계를 만들어 놓으면 지도에는 표시되지 않지만 같은 자료를 사용하는 다른 지도에 표시될 수도 있고 관계 설정을 해 준다면 지도에 관계를 나타내는 정보를 포함할 수 있게 해줍니다.
antqweEoNw_at (2023-01-02 05:25:39+00:00): 또한 한눈에 알아보기가 쉽더라고요.
morago (2023-01-02 05:42:43+00:00): hqst1님의 뜻은 잘 이해 했습니다.

등산로 추가할 때 관계를 넣어 놓으신 거는 보기는 했습니다. 근데, 그 relation을 그냥 등산로를 모아서 넣는게 맞는지 몰라서 여쭤 보는 겁니다. 만약 불곡산 둘레길이라던가 이런게 있다면 해당 관계 만들어서 넣는게 맞는 것 같은데, 산에 있는 등산로 전체에 관계를 지어 주는게 맞는건지 아닌지 헷갈려서 여쭤보는 겁니다. 
지금 여러 지역 등산로 그리고 있는데 예를 들어 설악산에 관계를 주려면 어디서부터 어디까지 관계를 넣어 주어야 하는지를 모르겠네요. 설악산국립공원 구역 안? 밖이지만 설악산 인근? 대청봉 주변?

아래는 hiking route에 대한 tag 정의 입니다.
일반 등산로와는 개념이 조금 다른 것 같아 여쭤보는 겁니다. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route%3Dhiking
antqweEoNw_at (2023-01-02 06:21:36+00:00): 설악산의 경우 구역의 있는 모든 등산로 경로에 관계를 주면 될것 같습니다.
jmarchon (2023-01-02 01:00:07+00:00): Hello,
What is the source of this address info?
Have a nice day,
jmarchon
ainola (2023-01-02 03:41:03+00:00): Hi, @jmarchon! The source comes from the dataset at https://openaddresses.io/
jmarchon (2023-01-02 06:46:25+00:00): Thank you for your answer. Would you mind using the source= tag in future changesets? It helps prevent confusion.
Have a wonderful day,
jmarchon
mackerski (2025-05-09 19:19:07+00:00): Where did this name come from? There is no sign nor any online reference to the name that doesn't come from OSM.
CjMalone (2023-01-04 14:44:16+00:00): Yep, looks good it me. Thanks
Diacritic (2023-01-02 02:11:22+00:00): Hi Andre Bacon,

If I understand the wikipedia article about Toki Pona correctly, this is a constructed language with no native users?

A similar edit introducing Klingon names for countries was not well received; would you be able to explain where these translations come from and what they are used for?
ZeLonewolf (2023-01-02 02:29:55+00:00): The source provided is CC-BY 4.0 and must be reverted because the license is incompatible with OSM.