piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Andrea Musuruane (2025-12-12 13:24:34+00:00): bicycle=yes? Ho qualche dubbio... https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12213776642
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175815544
totera (2025-12-11 18:55:56+00:00): Ciao jeawrong, la fermata dell'autobus (highway=bus_stop + public_transport=platform) va a lato della strada.
Se vuoi taggare anche il nodo appartenente alla strada come punto di fermata devi usare public_transport=stop_position.
Vedi https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Tag:highway%3Dbus_stop
jeawrong (2025-12-11 19:09:42+00:00): Sistemato, grazie
Gregory Peony (2025-12-15 07:42:50+00:00): Hi, all footprints likely represent buildings and they are generally acurate. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175815758
Una tantum (2025-12-23 09:36:30+00:00): Il tratto way/376083375 non è più da ripristinare, vedi Nota irrisolta #5004100 e Nota irrisolta #5004096, che senso ha mettere una nota "Sentiero pericoloso causa frana nel tratto compreso tra Via Faiedola e località Tazzola. Relation maintained by CAI Bologna." su una relation enormemente lunga, anziché 1. metterlo sul singola way che presenta il problema 2. non aggiornarla dopo 2 anni che si è verificato che è a posto (ma non era un tratto con source = survey:CAI?)
Frank Peng (2025-12-12 03:04:08+00:00): Hello TransAct-AS, what is the source for changing this driveway to an unclassified road? Does it seem too important to be classified as an unclassified road?
Frank Peng (2025-12-16 03:14:07+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175908835
Frank Peng (2025-12-12 02:55:20+00:00): Why did you change this road to an unclassified road? Shouldn't this be a driveway since it looks to be a driveway as seen in the aerial imagery? Maybe you overclassified this road?
Frank Peng (2025-12-12 02:58:09+00:00): Why did you change this road to an unclassified road? Shouldn't this be a driveway since it looks to be a driveway as seen in the aerial imagery? Perhaps you overclassified this road, causing this disconnected unclassified road?
Frank Peng (2025-12-16 03:14:32+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175908835
NorthCrab_upload (2025-12-11 23:52:53+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13370233202
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/73032240

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
BCNorwich (2025-12-13 07:24:34+00:00): Hi, Your new highway Way: 1457860136 duplicates an existing highway; highway duplication could cause disruption to routing. Thus, I've removed it.

The bridge Way: 1457860143 was also placed on top of an existing highway. I've removed this duplication.

It's likely you could not notice the duplication as the changeset was quite large. 

Regards Bernard,
BCNorwich (2025-12-13 07:25:55+00:00): I just noticed there was no layer tag on the bridge Way: 1457860143
BCNorwich (2025-12-13 07:29:44+00:00): Are there missing bridges at 54.4291356, -2.9263403 and Node: 2538444350
Langlaeufer (2025-12-12 10:27:14+00:00): Hallo murmeldin,
es gibt Standard-access-Werte die nicht gesetzt werden müssen. Dazu gehört bicycle/foot/horse und motor_vehicle auf Straßenhttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Germany
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175816409
Pilsetkartetajs (2025-12-12 12:27:34+00:00): Sveiki!
Atzīmējot ēkas stāvu skaitu, jumta stāvus atzīmē atsevišķi ar roof:levels, kas https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/88494848 jau bija norādīts, un līdz ar to stāvu skaits bija pareizs.
Vēl, gārāžu ēkai šeit vajadzēja būt daudzskaitlī, building=garages.

Kļūdas jau izlabotas.
Joe-w (2025-12-11 19:54:08+00:00): Hi johnny67sixseven,
Edits to OpenStreetMap should match what is on the ground - it's not a place for vandalism or false data. I've reverted all of your prior changes. Please make sure all of your edits are accurate before continuing. Thanks!
Fizzie-DWG (2025-12-17 23:58:50+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19184
cyclist789 (2026-04-09 07:38:01+00:00): Det ser ud til at De eller u/andershl har markeret hele omridset af Saksfjed Vildmark som barrier=fence. (Jeg har også sendt ham en besked.)
Der ser dog ud til at være nogle fejl i dette:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5896405972
Nær dette punkt går hegnene igennem to spor.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/259717678
Nordvest for dette punkt ser der ud til at være et cattle_grid. (Mine noter siger at sporet er motor_vehicle=private, hvilket jeg havde glemt at sætte på OSM.)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13090468624
Også nær her, ser der ud til at være et cattle_grid.

-

Jeg skal med glæde selv rette hegnene til vba. luftfoto, men jeg ville lige høre, om der var noget, jeg skal lægge mærke til.

PS: Jeres changesets har ikke nogen kilder/sources skrevet på, så jeg ved ikke om I har set stedet selv (source=survey), eller har tegnet det efter luftfoto (source=aerial_imagery).
andershl (2026-04-09 08:22:18+00:00): Tak, godt med lidt eftersyn på stedet. Marker endelig de rette/udeladte åbninger/led.
cyclist789 (2026-04-14 11:27:20+00:00): Det er gjort.
Jeg har ikke turdet ændre meget på reservaterne, så visse steder har jeg skildt dem fra hegnene. Jeg har også efterladt nogle *fixme* hist og her, som kræver, at man ser tingene tættere på.

Jeg har omdannet mange arealer til multipolygon-relationer. (Når et område er meget større end en bygning, er de bedre at arbejde med.)

Jeg ser, at man har delt Saksfjed Vildmark i to områder, med Lyttesholmvej imellem. Kunne man ikke bare lade vejen tælle som del af reservatet? (Ikke at det gør den store forskel.)
osmviborg (2026-04-14 14:57:39+00:00): Reservaterne kan fint bare være to lukkede polygoner. De behøver ikke at dele sider med nogen andre områder, det besværliggør bare en senere redigering. Multipolygoner som udelukkende består af outer giver ikke mening. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20446459
eggie (2025-12-11 19:25:38+00:00): Hoi Je vraagt feedback. Op één punt zit je nooduitgang vast aan een voetpad ipv aan de gebouwomtrek.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=175817149

MVG
eggie
bkleipool (2025-12-11 22:37:49+00:00): Ohja ik zie het, aangepast!
AwFi (2025-12-14 11:18:15+00:00): Ciao, sbaglio o non ci sono più tracce dei binari che hai aggiunto? Mi pare li abbiano completamente rimossi e poi rifatto la piazza diversamente con i lavori della metro.
Valerio Cardone (2025-12-14 17:34:03+00:00): Esatto, infatti li ho mappati come "railway=razed".
AwFi (2025-12-14 20:28:10+00:00): Però su openstreetmap di solito si mappano cose esistenti, quindi questo sarebbe più da openhistoricalmap. 
Il tag razed è molto abusato in questo per indicare cose non più esistenti e sono abbastanza convinto vada usato quasi esclusivamente per segnalare binari rimossi ma ancora presenti su qualche immagine aerea o simile.
Lo so che in altre città ci sono un sacco di binari mappati così ma io e altri stiamo lavorando per rimuoverli e portarli su openhistoricalmap ove possibile, sennò vengono rimossi.
Valerio Cardone (2025-12-14 20:47:33+00:00): Nell'ultimo periodo ho mappato un po' di binari tranviari non più esistenti basandomi sui binari mappati di Via Reggio, Via Catania e Corso Regio Parco (non mappati da me), consultando la wiki non leggendo nessun punto che dicesse esplicitamente di non farlo, li ho mappati. Sulla wiki c'è scritto che di solito vengono usati per mappare ferrovie con elementi ancora visibili. Dovrei smettere di mapparli?
AwFi (2025-12-14 21:55:41+00:00): Smettere di sicuro no se ti piace, ma magari farlo su openhistoricalmap, che tanto è molto simile. Tra l'altro su openrailwaymap.app si può anche vedere l'evoluzione storica tra tranvia attiva, disused e poi demolita se taggata correttamente con i vari anni. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Nonexistent_features#Transferring_a_feature_from_OpenStreetMap_to_OpenHistoricalMap
Qui puoi trovare qualche info su come fare, nei prossimi giorni vedo se ci sono altri mappatori che fanno aggiunto tratti di razed ma non più visibili e vediamo se si riesce a trasferire tutto là.
Gregory Peony (2025-12-20 19:08:10+00:00): Each footprint should represent a building. Please watch [this video about imagery interpretation](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJ-vUwtS3A8). Sometimes buildings may appear to share a common wall, but this is sometimes an illusion; only map them with shared nodes if you have reason to believe that they really do touch.

You duplicated exisitng building footprints.

Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175817320
Gregory Peony (2025-12-20 19:08:45+00:00): This footprint likely repersents a building, but it's oversized.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175817684
Frank Peng (2025-12-12 02:08:06+00:00): Why did you disconnect Way 124808806 from West Aztec Boulevard (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/189121433)? Did the entrance to the service road from West Aztec Boulevard get closed or removed recently? Also, you changed a driveway into an unclassified road. What is the source for those changes? Thanks.
Frank Peng (2025-12-16 03:11:40+00:00): Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175909217
kapazao (2025-12-13 08:21:38+00:00): Hola, se ha llegado a un acuerdo por el que dejamos de usar crossing=marked a crossing=uncontrolled.

Realicé una actualización de los cruces peatonales en España y me he encontrado que has puesto varios como marked, no sé por qué puesto que en principio el editor iD se supone que no lo recomienda ya desde 2022.
Por favor tenlo en cuenta.

Puedes revisar el tema en el foro https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/etiquetado-obsoleto-crossing-zebra/138642

Un saludo
Gilbert84 (2025-12-14 18:36:11+00:00): De acuerdo, a partir de ahora los pondré como 'uncontrolled'.
Frank Peng (2025-12-12 02:40:56+00:00): Why did you tag McCoy Avenue (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/119541147) as an unclassified road? It was a residential road since it provides access to homes.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dresidential
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/New_Mexico/Highway_Classification#Unclassified

And I'm guessing there's not actually a ford connecting McCoy Avenue and Hampton Arroyo as seen here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13370313749. Just a bridge carrying McCoy Avenue over Hampton Arroyo as seen in the aerial imagery.

What is the source for those changes? Thanks.
Frank Peng (2026-01-13 04:03:51+00:00): Please don't just auto-accept the suggested fixes by the iD editor. You added a ford to where there is not actually a ford: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13370313749
rempshaener (2025-12-11 20:18:07+00:00): Hallo,

du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
- Zu den Wegen:
Ein destination:forward auf highway=service ist eher unüblich. 
- emergency=ambulance_station
Da es sich nicht um eine Rettungswache handelt, passt emergency=disaster_response besser.
- website:1 und website:2
Es sollten nicht alle Websites aufgelistet werden, die in irgendeinem Bezug zum Objekt stehen. Bitte wieder entfernen.

Bei Fragen bitte melden.
Viele Grüße
Gregory Peony (2025-12-15 05:53:38+00:00): Hi, this footprint represents a building, but it is oversized. 

When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom out to obtain the orientation and shape, then zoom in so that you can accurately draw the footprint. Exclude shadows and yards when tracing the footprint. Keep in mind that you are looking at the [roofs of buildings](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape#Roof_shape), but mapping their footprints. Depending on how the scene is lit, pitched roofs may have light and dark sections that belong to one building. Generally pitched roofs overhang the walls of a building, so a footprint slightly smaller than the roof is accurate. You can scale selected features in ID with `shift+(-/+)`, or JOSM with `ctrl.+alt+Lclick & drag`.  Take care to make contributions that others can build upon.

Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
NeisBot (2025-12-11 21:58:39+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 19 potential crossings.

Problematic elements (top 3 by category):
https://osm.org/way/694537681 v3 | 7 crossings
https://osm.org/way/388102693 v7 | 7 crossings
https://osm.org/way/616989734 v9 | 5 crossings

Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/6521602546 v5
https://osm.org/node/6521602542 v4
https://osm.org/node/12286192781 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=175818043
NeisRevert (2025-12-12 08:20:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/175834699
where the comment is: "Revert of unintended geometry change"
Hopla57 (2025-12-11 19:50:33+00:00): Vu fermé sur place
Gregory Peony (2025-12-15 07:50:58+00:00): Thank you for your contribution! 

Please do not connect the corners of buildings to other buildings or features such as highways or residential areas. In the iD Editor, hold down the `Alt` key to prevent your cursor from snapping to existing data and accidentally creating shared(grey) nodes. This [video about connected nodes](https://youtu.be/ltn1VOiq5_0) has more information and a guide.

Keep on mapping!
markkerrigan (2025-12-11 20:08:42+00:00): removed point as water features does not appear to exist
Branko Kokanovic (2025-12-12 19:17:23+00:00): Zdravo,
Samo da ti javim da ne stavljamo imena na staze i puteve koji nisu u RGZ-u oznaceni tim imenom, ili da imaju neku lokalnu tablu (tj. da je ime zvanicno). Imamo izvestaj na sajtu DINA: https://dina.openstreetmap.rs/ gde se trudimo da imamo unete sve kucne brojeve i ulice, i da to odrzavamo. Tu smo i na forumu i na telegram grupi, pa svrni ako hoces ili bi nesto da pitas. Koliko vidim, sve sto radis po Pozarevcu je super (ako si pocetnik - svaka cast!), samo sam hteo ovo da napomenem
Andrija Baldić (2025-12-14 01:31:43+00:00): Pozdrav, 
Hvala na ispravci. Jesam početnik i entuzijasta koji voli geografiju i geografske karte pa sam možda napravio i par grešaka ponegde, ali se trudim da sve što mapiram bude što preciznije i tačnije obeleženo.
Što se tiče obeležavanja imena ulica, puteva zaista nisam znao da je to slučaj pa se izvinjavam. To je neki kolokvijalni naziv tako da razumem. 
Hvala na podršci!
Branko Kokanovic (2025-12-14 18:54:01+00:00): Ma nije problem, sve što uradiš se ceni! Ako imaš nekih pitanja, ili hoćeš da ćaskaš sa ostalim "entuzijastima koji vole geografiju", nađi nas na telegramu ili forumu:)
kadiwa (2025-12-11 21:39:43+00:00): Hallo timax,

willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Leider zeigt der Link, unter dem das Foto zu finden sein sollte, nur eine Anmeldeseite. Es wäre schön, wenn du das Bild öffentlich machen würdest und dann den neuen Link einfügen würdest.

Ich möchte außerdem einmal fragen, was mit dem Friseurladen ist: Hat der dicht gemacht? Steht die Ladenfläche jetzt leer? Das wäre hilfreich zu wissen.

Grüße,
kadiwa
timax-osm (2025-12-12 08:45:09+00:00): Hallo kadiwa,
danke für deine Hinweise!
Foto ist gelöscht, nicht unbedingt erforderlich, Mapillary liefert ähnliche Fotos.
Ich habe die Position des POI etwas korrigiert, genaugenommen müsste es Graßmannweg 7a heißen, denke ich, direkt neben dem Hörgeräte-Akustiker.
Hast du genauere offizielle Karten?
Die Kita mit der Hausnummer 6 belegt größenmäßig bis Hausnummer 7, leider finde ich keine genauere Karte, z.B. geoportal-hamburg sagt nichts zu Hausnummer 7 aus.
Das Friseurgeschäft gibt es schon lange nicht mehr und es steht auch nichts leer.
Ich hoffe, so ist alles ok.
Viele Grüße
Timm
timax-osm (2025-12-12 09:06:44+00:00): P.S. Google Maps liefert auch nur vage  Ergebnisse.
Der POI liegt als kleines Büro genau zwischen Hausnummer 7/Hörgeräte Akustiker  und Frosch-Kita.
kadiwa (2025-12-12 15:17:52+00:00): Ich konnte die Adresse im Geoportal finden (mit dem ALKIS-Datensatz: https://geoportal-hamburg.de/?mdid=0C6CD167-F1F3-43E7-B897-9C49D3CD6AB7) und wir dürfen den Datensatz sogar verwenden, da er vom LGV unter der DL-DE->BY-2.0-Lizenz veröffentlicht wird. Allerdings ist der Datensatz manchmal ungenau.
Nur so als Beispiel: https://osm.org/node/3366782442 diese Adresse ist in ALKIS falsch erfasst.
timax-osm (2025-12-12 16:03:57+00:00): Ja, die Karte hatte ich auch, Hausnummer 7a gibt's offiziell nicht, trifft es aber recht gut, finde ich.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-12-11 23:52:56+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1457881328

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
gurglypipe (2025-12-11 23:24:12+00:00): Oops, thanks!
Frans S (2025-12-12 15:01:00+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Rather completely mapped.
Please square all your rectangular buildings with the Q key while selected.
When you draw a rectangle by hand, it is mostly not exactly square, however difficult to see. In JOSM (used by validators) is a plug in that detects buildings that are not exactly square.
Best regards,
unen (2025-12-17 08:12:29+00:00): Merhabalar, 

Anladığım kadarıyla multipolygon bina üzerinde güncellemeler yapmışsınız. Değişiklik kümesi açıklamalarında bu tarz yorumlarda bulunmak yerine yaptığınız değişikliği açıklamanız diğer tüm kullanıcılar açısından daha faydalı olacaktır. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Multipoligonların yanlış kullanıldığını ve uygulandığını düşünüyorsanız bu konuları topluluk iletişim kanallarına taşımanız herkes adına daha faydalı olur:
 
https://t.me/osm_tr
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/tr/118 

İyi günler, iyi çalışmalar.
user_23196460 (2025-12-17 08:34:11+00:00): Merhaba. Kendi multipoligonumu değiştirmiştim, ilk seferde eklemeyi beceremediğim için :)
unen (2025-12-17 09:49:29+00:00): Selamlar, teşekkürler açıklama için. Destek ve fikir alışverişi için eğer üye değilsen iletişim kanallarına bekleriz :)
fghj753 (2025-12-11 21:11:39+00:00): Judging by wiki page suggesting direction=forward/backward tags, maybe the speed display should be connected to road it displays speed to? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dspeed_display
JanezPavelZebovec (2026-07-17 14:46:58+00:00): Pozdravljen!
Rad bi te opozoril, da si v tem sklopu sprememb  več hiš napačno preznačil iz `building=house` (hiša) v `building=hayrack` (kozolec). Boš popravil sam, ali naj popravim jaz?
Lep pozdrav!
Joško Horvat (2026-07-17 19:30:22+00:00): Ja, sem popravil vseh 8 hiš . Hvala za opozorilo. Sem si pa vzel še malo časa za okolico. Eno cesto, z imenom "Malečnik - slepi del" sem preimenoval v Hrenco. Če je to za lokalce važno ?! Sam nisem z tega konca. https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=id#map=20/46.5630877/15.7123477
JanezPavelZebovec (2026-07-18 14:53:28+00:00): Odlično, hvala za popravek.
Mislim, da ima vsak kartografski podatek, če le resničen, svojo vrednost in ga je vredno vnesti. Je pa stvar v tem, da se je treba vedno odločat, čemu posvetiti svoj čas ;)
Fraxi (2025-12-12 08:10:44+00:00): Благодаря, че си върнал таговете!

В iD редактора ми е трудно да намеря https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1457893588. В JOSM ще е по-лесно.
Gregory Peony (2025-12-15 08:16:35+00:00): Good to see you cross referencing another source but these buildings are no longer visible in Bing, so most likely no longer exist. Use alternate sources to aid your interpretation, but unless you know a source to be more recent, then don't add buildings only visible in it. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175821809
aigne (2025-12-17 11:13:18+00:00): Thanks!
Gregory Peony (2025-12-15 07:10:14+00:00): Hi, the footprints you added here generally represent buildings, but could be more accurate, becasue a fair proportion are oversized.

When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom out to obtain the orientation and shape, then zoom in so that you can accurately draw the footprint. Exclude shadows and yards when tracing the footprint. Keep in mind that you are looking at the [roofs of buildings](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape#Roof_shape), but mapping their footprints. Depending on how the scene is lit, pitched roofs may have light and dark sections that belong to one building. Generally pitched roofs overhang the walls of a building, so a footprint slightly smaller than the roof is accurate. You can scale selected features in ID with `shift+(-/+)`, or JOSM with `ctrl.+alt+Lclick & drag`.  Take care to make contributions that others can build upon.
Frans S (2025-12-12 11:47:26+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
When you identify an object and want to map it, check where the shadow starts and ends. 
Be cautious when mapping dark spots that you suspect may be part of a building.
When you map a building that continues over the edge of your task, try to map it completely.And don't forget to square each building.
Best regards
Frans S (2025-12-12 11:49:23+00:00): Another issue
 * Please map individual buildings without collecting multiple nearby buildings into a single object.
The humanitarian teams use the size of the buildings to estimate the number of people living there. This helps them to work out the approximate total population in the area and how much equipment or medication to bring with them. Buildings that are too big do not fit in with these calculations and lead to inaccuracies in the population count.
user_5359 (2025-12-12 08:53:13+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/13276682729 (a tree) more than 100 meters. Please check the correct position. If you need help, you are welcome!
ntzm (2025-12-17 12:36:13+00:00): Corrected https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4849766973 to be clockwise rather than anticlockwise