piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Johnatan Reyes (2025-08-20 02:30:55+00:00): i'm actually pretty confident, just a matter of a routine every time i save any changes at all:)
Gregory Peony (2025-08-20 14:59:03+00:00): Okay. Personally I request review of changes I am unsure about. Sometimes I upload changes I am not certain about in one changeset/save and add the review requested tag to those. This allows others to filter for those changesets.

Please upload changes in groups that share a common theme and location, for example after you've spent 5-15 minutes mapping. This may speed up your contributions becasue you won't have to save so often, and generally it makes working with your changesets easier. Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Group_similar_changes_together
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-10-10 23:51:18+00:00): Fake bridge
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170698007
Gregory Peony (2025-08-20 15:26:14+00:00): You seem aware that snapping the corners of the buildings to other buildings or features such as roads and paths is generally not accurate. You deleted one of these footprints which makes the warning go away, but you did not address its root cause (footprint inaccuracy). In iD Editor, hold down the `Alt` key to keep nodes from snapping to other objects and accidentally connecting. This [video about connected nodes](https://youtu.be/ltn1VOiq5_0) has more information and a guide.

The root cause of this issue was the inaccuracy of footprints as they are generally slightly oversized leading to them being closer to one another. The SE footprint is also positioned North of where it should be causing the footprint to overlap another building visible in the imagery. Press m to move selected features.

When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom in so that you can see the outline of the building and mark the corners carefully. Exclude shadows and yards when tracing the footprint.  Keep in mind that you are looking at the roofs of buildings, but mapping their footprints. Depending on how the scene is lit, pitched roofs may have light and dark sections that belong to one building. Generally pitched roofs overhang the walls of a building, so a footprint slightly smaller than the roof is accurate. You can scale selected features in ID with shift+(-/+), or JOSM with ctrl.+alt+Lclick & drag.  Take care to make contributions that others can build upon.

Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
Gregory Peony (2025-08-20 03:12:35+00:00): Welcome to OSM!

You spotted buildings in the imagery but generally mapped their footprints oversized. 

When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom in so that you can see the outline of the building and mark the corners carefully. Exclude shadows and yards when tracing the footprint.  Keep in mind that you are looking at the roofs of buildings, but mapping their footprints. Depending on how the scene is lit, pitched roofs may have light and dark sections that belong to one building. Generally pitched roofs overhang the walls of a building, so a footprint slightly smaller than the roof is accurate. You can scale selected features in ID with shift+(-/+), or JOSM with ctrl.+alt+Lclick & drag.  Take care to make contributions that others can build upon.

On several ocations you created inappropriately shared nodes between the footprints you added and existing feeatures. Hold alt to prevent the generation of shared nodes.

Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
Gregory Peony (2025-08-20 03:07:47+00:00): Welcome to OSM! The footprint shape looks appropriately unsquared. 

Please report the source(s) you used for the information you tagged on this footprint. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source 

Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170698198
Gregory Peony (2025-08-20 03:01:21+00:00): Welcome to OSM! 

You've spotted buildings and constructions here ,but many are oversized. 

When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom in so that you can see the outline of the building and mark the corners carefully. Exclude shadows and yards when tracing the footprint.  Keep in mind that you are looking at the roofs of buildings, but mapping their footprints. Depending on how the scene is lit, pitched roofs may have light and dark sections that belong to one building. Generally pitched roofs overhang the walls of a building, so a footprint slightly smaller than the roof is accurate. You can scale selected features in ID with shift+(-/+), or JOSM with ctrl.+alt+Lclick & drag.  Take care to make contributions that others can build upon.

What is the source of information for the specific building values you've applied? Only apply specific values if you're certain they're accurate. When mapping remotely building=yes will suffice; contributors conducting a survey can change this later. Please minimise the missinformation you add to the database. Check https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_features for how to tag features. 

Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
Gregory Peony (2025-08-20 02:41:52+00:00): Welcome to OSM! 

Many of the footprints yo added here envelope multiple buildings. Each building should be mapped with its own footprint. Use plots, shadows, and colours to discriminate between adjacent buildings. 

Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
Gregory Peony (2025-08-20 02:38:06+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I think you enveloped 2 buildings using 1 footprint here. Each building should be represented by one footprint. 


When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom in so that you can see the outline of the building and mark the corners carefully. Exclude shadows and yards when tracing the footprint.  Keep in mind that you are looking at the roofs of buildings, but mapping their footprints. Depending on how the scene is lit, pitched roofs may have light and dark sections that belong to one building. Generally pitched roofs overhang the walls of a building, so a footprint slightly smaller than the roof is accurate. You can scale selected features in ID with shift+(-/+), or JOSM with ctrl.+alt+Lclick & drag.  Take care to make contributions that others can build upon.

Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
Gregory Peony (2025-08-20 02:34:47+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You identified buildings in imagery and ingeneral appropriately squared them however the imagery allows for them to be more accurate as they are generally oversized. 


When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom in so that you can see the outline of the building and mark the corners carefully. Exclude shadows and yards when tracing the footprint.  Keep in mind that you are looking at the roofs of buildings, but mapping their footprints. Depending on how the scene is lit, pitched roofs may have light and dark sections that belong to one building. Generally pitched roofs overhang the walls of a building, so a footprint slightly smaller than the roof is accurate. You can scale selected features in ID with shift+(-/+), or JOSM with ctrl.+alt+Lclick & drag.  Take care to make contributions that others can build upon.

Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
Gregory Peony (2025-08-20 23:30:43+00:00): Hi, you spotted a building in the imagery but the footprint you mapped is not as accutrate as the imagery allows becasue it is oversized. 

When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom in so that you can see the outline of the building and mark the corners carefully. Exclude shadows and yards when tracing the footprint.  Keep in mind that you are looking at the roofs of buildings, but mapping their footprints. Depending on how the scene is lit, pitched roofs may have light and dark sections that belong to one building. Generally pitched roofs overhang the walls of a building, so a footprint slightly smaller than the roof is accurate. You can scale selected features in ID with shift+(-/+), or JOSM with ctrl.+alt+Lclick & drag.  Take care to make contributions that others can build upon.

Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
Frans S (2025-08-22 10:58:02+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 
However, Check these issues
A: Inaccurate mapping.  Follow the rooflines more accurate.
D: Connecting Nodes to other features. Do not connect nodes to other features or buildings.


Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170698627
Gregory Peony (2025-08-20 03:29:15+00:00): Welcome to OSM!

You spotted buildings in the imagery but the footprints you mapped are inaccurate.

When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom in so that you can see the outline of the building and mark the corners carefully. Exclude shadows and yards when tracing the footprint.  Keep in mind that you are looking at the roofs of buildings, but mapping their footprints. Depending on how the scene is lit, pitched roofs may have light and dark sections that belong to one building. Generally pitched roofs overhang the walls of a building, so a footprint slightly smaller than the roof is accurate. You can scale selected features in ID with shift+(-/+), or JOSM with ctrl.+alt+Lclick & drag.  Take care to make contributions that others can build upon.

Please do not snap the corners of the buildings to other buildings or features such as roads and paths. In the iD Editor, hold down the `Alt` key to keep nodes from snapping to other objects and accidentally connecting. This [video about connected nodes](https://youtu.be/ltn1VOiq5_0) has more information and a guide.

After mapping buildings, please remember to square their corners. Most buildings have square corners because that's easy to build. Unless the building is clearly a different shape then it's best to assume that the corners should be squared. In the iD Editor, use the `Q` key to square the corners. This [video about squaring features](https://youtu.be/Xs5wX592E1o) has more information and a guide.

Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
i2004 (2025-08-20 13:44:28+00:00): todavia la 102 no llega a Lisandro de la torre?
AgusQui (2025-08-20 13:47:21+00:00): Todavía no
Totor (2025-09-17 05:42:27+00:00): Hi Gowin,
I'm not sure this split of AS Fortuna was really needed. The separation of the lanes is temporary, and right now the barrier in front of shell was already removed...
Also this relation seems to be on the wrong direction: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18364205
uᴉʍOꓨ (2025-09-17 07:22:01+00:00): Thanks for checking this out Totor! 

I'll look into this again, but for now, the invalid turn restriction, and missing oneway tag has been fixed.
Gregory Peony (2025-08-22 04:19:41+00:00): The footprint I flagged enveloes multiple buildigns. Each footprint should represent one building. Use shadows, colours and plots to discriminate between adjacent buildings. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170701237
Gregory Peony (2025-08-22 04:16:09+00:00): These appear to only be walls. Look at the shadow cast by the feature on the East. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170701251
jake-low (2025-08-20 04:35:12+00:00): Changeset comment got cut off. Was supposed to say:

South San Francisco, CA: categorize footways around El Camino High School as either sidewalk or crossing
aharvey (2025-10-27 22:29:17+00:00): I've restored the address node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12411966515 which was dragged to the wrong location in this changeset.
nevw (2025-08-20 05:11:44+00:00): Hi, the imagery appears out of date for address 492. If you check Esri imagery you will see two new buildings…units 1 & 2.
It is always best practice to check both Bing and Esri as Esri is often more recent.
shax13 (2025-08-20 06:13:27+00:00): Hi,
Thank you for the comment. I am just getting started with mapping. Will look into it. :)
nevw (2025-08-25 23:18:07+00:00): fixed now
nevw (2025-08-20 05:13:58+00:00): Hi John, can you delete the name Buuilding from one of these.
fortera_au (2025-08-20 23:42:19+00:00): Also, is Waverly Orthopaedic Clinic really a hospital, or is there a better tag for this?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170701905
nevw (2025-08-25 23:34:51+00:00): fixed now, also retagged hospital to clinic
nevw (2025-08-20 05:18:51+00:00): Hi, the two buildings addressed relations should be redone as simple polygons with out the join
nevw (2025-08-20 05:03:17+00:00): Hi, there are two buildings at 316 and both are addressed as unit 1.
I expect that one should be unit 2
Stalker61 (2025-08-25 15:45:48+00:00): Здравствуйте
вы точно уверены, что это 127 номер участка
dknelson9876 (2025-08-24 04:02:27+00:00): I don't know if you missed this, but the bus number is already present and belongs only in the ref=* tag, not the name=* tag. Is there an app or website you're using that wasn't already prominently showing the ref=* value?

While I'm at it, given this isn't the only edit you've made related to public transit, I want to make sure you're aware of the Utah/Transit wiki page (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Utah/Transit), where we keep notes and links to sources and tools
eggie (2025-08-20 05:54:55+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-08-20 07:20:09+00:00): Het wegdeel dat uit het lood lag bij de brug het ik teruggelegd. 
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=170702505
eggie (2025-08-20 05:58:22+00:00): Martijn... Je fietspad begint in de Sikkelstraat op een wandelpad.  Hoe gaat dat ooit routeren? 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-08-20 06:03:38+00:00): Is er wellicht een fietsoversteek gekomen bij de Sikkelstraat.
Situatie in juli
https://oud.satellietdataportaal.nl/?base=brtachtergrondkaart&res=0.3%2C0.5&datemin=16-04-2024&loc=52.50830%2C4.984188%2C19z&overlay=mos-0&marker=loc&acqdate=2025-07-19&acqid=20250719_110512_SVNEO-02&sensor=SuperView-NEO
Martijn1980 (2025-08-20 08:54:22+00:00): ik probeerde te mailen. het oude voetpad is weg, er komt nu een doorlopend fietspad. ook zijn er oversteken veranderd. helaas kan ik de fotos van de locatie niet toevoegen hier. 

ik heb hier de overzichtskaart van de vanosweg na de renovatie als link.

https://prnt.sc/0sQElxhg0dwH

kan je daarmee wel correct aanvullen?
eggie (2025-08-20 09:01:49+00:00): Yep ... thx.. dat gaat wel lukken.. Dan 'moet' je straks maar even kijken.
Geef wel een seintje.
eggie (2025-08-20 09:49:11+00:00): Nou dat is wel volkomen anders geworden en er gaat nog meer veranderen.  Is het wel klaar hier? 
Het is even wachten op een recentere luchtfoto.
Ik heb het in ieder geval routeerbaar gemaakt De Van Osweg verdubbeld.
Dit alles volgens de plantekening.
Het is dus een beetje bij benadering.
De trottoirs zijn opgenomen met sidewalk =right en left in het fietspad.
De oversteek  voor autoverkeer ligt ook anders.
Paar keer CTRL-F5 straks om het effect te versnellen van de rendering. 
Op de van Osweg lopen ook busroutes.. die heb ik intact gelaten en de weg verdubbeld. Dat is anders niet te doen voor starters. 

Dat fietspad over die Sikkelstraat loopt anders. De laadpalen zijn verplaatst conform tekening. 
Bij de brug komen ook aparte fietspaden zie ik op de tekening. 

Nog genoeg te doen hier.

Mapse
eggie
eggie (2025-08-20 10:01:41+00:00): Wanneer die fietsoversteek over de Overlanderstraat nog niet klaar is dan dat nog op construction moeten.
De verdubbelde van Osweg staat op slot voor fietsers. Wanneer die fietsers nog gebruik kunnen maken van de hoofdrijbaan dan weer van het slot af. Wanneer ik de sat foto zie dan is alles nog een zandwoestijn. 
Laat maar weten.
eggie (2025-08-20 10:05:20+00:00): Zo te zien is het asfalteren volgende week klaar

P416577: Van Osweg Purmer-Noord Purmerend Asfalteringswerkzaamheden Van Osweg asfalteringswerkzaamheden vier fases
Purmerend
11-06-2025 00:00 t/m 28-08-2025 00:00 

https://melvin.ndw.nu/public
Martijn1980 (2025-08-20 10:31:01+00:00): Hallo, het asfalteren is klaar. het asfalteren waar je het over hebt is een ander traject. Er wordt omhoog, vanaf wakerdijk naar boven toe, alleen een nieuwe laag asfalt aangebracht. De originele werkzaamheden zijn klaar op Zaterdag a.s.

De tekening van de gemeente is de meeste recente en accurate tekening. :) 

De busroutes blijven hetzelfde.
Martijn1980 (2025-08-20 10:34:23+00:00): Ik zie ook trouwens dat de wegverdubbeling er niet in staat, als je kijkt naar de grotenhuijzenweg, zie je in het midden ook bomen staan, die staan ook op de tekening die ik aan jou heb gestuurd, dat gaan ze ook doen bij de van osweg, ik zie daar nog een enkele weg, waar is het midden trace? er staan daar ook vluchtheuvel palen, en er zijn middenbelijningen voor oversteken. die zie ik zo een twee drie nog niet.
eggie (2025-08-20 10:35:21+00:00): Dan klopt het nu aardig. Zijn die aparte fietspaden bij de brug al klaar?
Martijn1980 (2025-08-20 10:35:57+00:00): Oh, dat is denk de standaard kaart. LOL :) ik zie nu wel e.e.a. op de andere kaarten denk.
eggie (2025-08-20 10:39:35+00:00): De standaardkaart rendert direct. Even CTRL-F5   .. cache leegmaken . De andere layers duren dagen tot meer dan een week.
Martijn1980 (2025-08-20 10:43:16+00:00): Ik ga vanmiddag even kijken of die bij de brug al klaar zijn, het probleem is dat door de brug leidingen lopen van KPN, ZIGGO etc. en die mogen de aannemers niet verleggen, ik hoorde dat de brug pas later wordt gedaan NADAT de nuts- en kabel bedrijven hun leidingen hebben aangepast.
Martijn1980 (2025-08-20 10:45:18+00:00): een mooie appje is de BOUW app, hierbij kan je, in jouw of andere gemeentes, projecten bekijken die wellicht van toepassing kunnen zijn op de wegsamenstelling en de ruimtelijke omgeving.
eggie (2025-08-20 10:54:32+00:00): OSM houdt je in ieder geval niet van de straat :)
Gregory Peony (2025-08-22 04:13:39+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You spotted buildings in imagery but the footprints you mapped could be more accurate.

When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom in so that you can see the outline of the building and mark the corners carefully. Exclude shadows and yards when tracing the footprint.  Keep in mind that you are looking at the roofs of buildings, but mapping their footprints. Depending on how the scene is lit, pitched roofs may have light and dark sections that belong to one building. Generally pitched roofs overhang the walls of a building, so a footprint slightly smaller than the roof is accurate. You can scale selected features in ID with shift+(-/+), or JOSM with ctrl.+alt+Lclick & drag.  Take care to make contributions that others can build upon.

After mapping buildings, please remember to square their corners. Most buildings have square corners because that's easy to build. Unless the building is clearly a different shape then it's best to assume that the corners should be squared. In the iD Editor, use the `Q` key to square the corners. This [video about squaring features](https://youtu.be/Xs5wX592E1o) has more information and a guide.

See what your mapping currently looks like on the OSM carto standard layer.

Thanks for your contribution.
Pathumthani (2025-08-20 09:43:48+00:00): wäre schön mal zu erfahren, was du unter thema node-network angeblich an meinen knotenradwegen veränderst!
geozeisig (2025-08-20 15:03:16+00:00): Hallo
es ist für Fahrradrouten nicht vorgesehen, dass bei der Rolle route steht.