piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
FajrAl (2026-07-27 15:59:41+00:00): Are you sure about the motel? They're rare in Indonesia, let alone on a school grounds
CoenDJ (2026-07-29 08:32:36+00:00): Ahh you were mere hours before I wanted to add this path! 🙂 I was confused it was already showing up in iD editor while I could not see it in other apps. Well done and thanks!
thepoliennist (2026-07-29 09:47:06+00:00): Ha ha, that was a close call 😂. I’d been meaning to add this path for a while too, but the aerial view wasn’t very clear. As I was able to go back there a few days ago, I finally took some GPS readings.
Thanks, and you’re welcome ! 😀
CoenDJ (2026-07-29 10:57:07+00:00): Haha same here 😬. I was there Jul 10th and wanted to add it but was on mobile. Finally, today I got around doing it. I recorded a track as well when I was there, saved it as a todo. Great minds think alike ;)
Frans S (2026-07-29 12:27:39+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please take the width of a trace into consideration when you decide to tag a highway . Here you tagged a trace over 3 mtr wide as a path. Unclassified was a better choice.
Best regards.
Frans S (2026-07-29 12:29:51+00:00): and. continue a road over the edge of your task. When you stop before or just on the edge, it doesn't show up on the adjacent task square,
Best regards
DressyPear4 (2026-07-28 13:02:01+00:00): Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/186518124
B252697 (2026-07-27 15:28:13+00:00): Official Source from NParks:
https://isomer-user-content.by.gov.sg/152/c30f195b-524e-4384-9b8f-969a2fe28245/Map%20Current%20PDF%20040326.pdf
DressyPear4 (2026-07-28 13:02:00+00:00): Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/186518124
eerib (2026-07-27 15:35:26+00:00): Discussion in

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186424970
Jonathan Delaney (2026-07-28 16:46:10+00:00): Hi, I saw that you requested a review on this edit. It's a huge improvement over what was there previously, but there's a few things to look out for:

1. The parking lot node is redundant; the area is already tagged as amenity=parking.
2. The largest area:highway=footway you tagged is actually a driveway. I highly recommend KyFromAbove's oblique imagery for getting a sense of things that might be hidden from top-down imagery, such as garage doors on a building.
3. Be careful with connecting areas to other features. I noticed that several areas aren't connected to adjacent areas; for example, the area:highway next to the playground isn't actually connected to the playground or shelter. This makes things more difficult to edit in the future. 
4. When you have a situation like the park area where an area is surrounded by footpaths, leave a gap between areas and footpath ways. This is because the area of the park ends where the area of the footpath begins, not the footpath centerline. It shouldn't matter that much, and you'll find a lot of places that map it like you did, but it becomes annoying to disentangle to the two features if they ever need to be edited independently.
5. Are you sure the industrial area to the north is a scrap yard and not just industrial storage?

Overall, though, it's a solid first edit. If you have any more specific questions, feel free to ask.
campbelltree (2026-07-27 17:16:38+00:00): This is incorrect tagging - forest areas should be bounded by tree trunks and not canopies. Tree nodes are considered higher detail than forest areas.
Svalbard (2026-07-28 16:19:10+00:00): Hallo Cr0n1X, mit dem von Dir vergebenen access-Wert, dürfte sich auch das Klinikpersonal nicht auf den Wegen bewegen, da sie ja keine Patienten/Kunden sind. Ist das so gewollt? Vielleicht wäre [1] angebrachter. Gruß Svalbard

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:access%3Dprivate
Cr0n1X (2026-07-28 16:24:25+00:00): Hey, auf sollte es dann geändert werden? Natürlich ist dort Personal mit eingeschlossen, aber das sollte es doch bei jedem "customers" Weg sein oder nicht? Es ging mir nur darum, dass  die Wege nicht einfach für die Öffentlichkeit sind, so wie die anderen Wege und Straße in der Klink auch bereits gekennzeichnet sind. LG
Svalbard (2026-07-28 16:42:59+00:00): Hallo, ich hatte Dir einen Link zum Wiki gegeben bzgl. des Wertes „access=private“. Kunden bedeutet nun mal nur Kunden und niemand anderes [1]. Siehe Link unten. Zitat aus dem Wiki zu „access=private“: „Routing- und Navigationsprogramme werten dieses Tag aus und meiden die so gekennzeichneten Wege.“ Das ist wahrscheinlich das, was Du erreichen möchtest. Keine „komoot-Wanderer oder Radfahrer“, die das Klinikgelände als Abkürzung etc. nutzen. Gruß Svalbard

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:access=customers?uselang=de
Cr0n1X (2026-07-28 17:39:43+00:00): Hey, ah jetzt versehe ich, was du meinst. Habe die gemachten Änderungen dementsprechend angepasst. Danke dir für die Klarstellung. Grüße
FajrAl (2026-07-27 15:55:57+00:00): trauma yang mendalam pastinya, wkwk
Aethonatic (2026-07-27 16:17:40+00:00): Please stop redrawing the tree nodes as wood areas. natural=wood is for areas covered by trees, not singular trees. I suggest reverting your changes.
Fraxi (2026-07-27 18:59:45+00:00): Това може спокойно да се тагне с craft=elevator Виж съответната страница в уикито. Нищо, че е офис.
Примерно виж в страницата за занаятите https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:craft на колко места пише "workplace or office of a/an..."
kitsee (2026-07-27 18:44:42+00:00): Hi there Adrian,
I dont think Farmland is correct here, it looks more like a meadow, I can even see sheep in the imagery.
Adrian Shobrooke (2026-07-27 19:45:23+00:00): Hi kitsee. It's certainly farmland, but meadow would be a refinement. You may well be seeing sheep, but all the on the ground evidence is bovine. Literally! 

The tethered mast visible in some imagery has since been removed in the year since I mapped it so now deleted.
kitsee (2026-07-27 20:00:27+00:00): I'm afraid you are mistaken. Meadow is not a refinement of farmland. farmland is only used tilled land, i.e. land that has crop mechanically planted, .e.g  corn, wheat, etc. meadow is used for managed grassland intended for grazing animals. this very obviously fits the definition of a meadow. It is also important to note that there is virtually no land used for farming crops within the Welsh valleys (the area roughly between Swansea and Pontypool) due to terrain. We've have a huge problem with mistagging of farmland and heaths in the past which is slowly being rectified.
Adrian Shobrooke (2026-07-27 20:44:19+00:00): There's no need to be so patronising.  The wiki does state that many mappers have a preference for farmland to mean cropland. Fair enough. So I'm not mistaken, I just used a value that could be refined to be more specific. I'd actually taken that on board, but clearly you felt you needed to double down on telling me I was wrong. Cheers for that.
kitsee (2026-07-27 21:12:35+00:00): That was not my intention, and I apologise that it came across that way. I tend to be rather blunt in how I speak.

I did not recognise that you were agreeing with me in your previous comment. Instead, I understood the reference to cattle rather than sheep as a defence of the farmland tag. As I found the comment a little confusing, I tried to elaborate on the distinction between the tags and clear up what I thought was a misunderstanding.

I was trying to convey what I understand to be the majority view within the OSM community, as well as the way the meadow and farmland tags are generally used locally. To keep the comment short and concise, I reduced that distinction to a simple matter of correct or incorrect rather than explaining the wider context.

The misunderstanding was probably my fault, and I apologise for any offence caused.
Adrian Shobrooke (2026-07-27 21:47:56+00:00): Thank you for the apology.  I had edited the area, but did not really say so. So apology accepted and an apology from me for lack of clear response re acceptance of your advice.

I wonder, as some arable land is increasingly being rotated with animals,  usually pigs, how this would be tagged? (It may be better for land cleanliness and fertility.) Might not apply in Wales, but farmland could be generically correct in that it would be 'cropland' and meadow. I'm sure we'd not want to be changing tags every 2 or 3 years depending on current use.
Baloo Uriza (2026-07-27 17:52:03+00:00): par should be par=* not ref=*, the ref=* should just be the hole number.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:golf%3Dhole
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186465687
DENelson83 (2026-07-27 20:15:57+00:00): Is there any reason the "opening_date" tag for way/168055476 says "2024-12-31" and not "2026-07-27"?
022 (2026-07-28 04:40:57+00:00): congrats on getting to "open the bridge" on OSM. Exciting day!
Fraxi (2026-07-27 18:37:42+00:00): Ама ... виж сега какво става... но ти не знаеш. С @Dimitar155 си бяхме говорили, че подобен тип обекти(домашна кухня) е добре да се тагват с shop=food + food=prepared_meals 
Виж и това - не е редно да има повече от 1 тип обект(feature), но има и изключения.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
Fraxi (2026-07-27 18:40:08+00:00): Ето ти няколко примера:
node/11193031749
node/13264504296
node/4980845667
Kaloan-koko (2026-07-27 19:41:27+00:00): Я да видим дали правилно разбирам.
Ако ти сготвят/допичат/"сглабят" яденето на момента е amenity=fast_food.
Ако има готова храна стил бюфет/столова и  се дава основно на порции, може да се седне, то е amenity=restaurant с self_service=only.
Ако има готова храна и се дава основно на грамаж за вкъщи и (почти) няма места за сядане е shop=food с food=prepared_meals.
Fraxi (2026-07-28 08:17:43+00:00): Моето мнение(не казвам, че е правилно):
дюнери, кебапчета( node/10807147499 ), пици от будка и подобен тип "бързо хранене" - amenity=fast_food "Фантазията" на Красно село за мен си е amenity=fast_food

За столовата си има amenity=canteen(или amenity=fast_food + fast_food=cafeteria , както там е споменато). Има и таг amenity=food_court , който, доколкото разбирам, се отнася за такива заведения като по горните етажи на моловете. Забравих за името на едното такова заведение, но другото беше KFC в Мол България.

shop=food + food=prepared_meals сме стигнали до разбирането, че е подходящ за тип "домашна кухня", готвено. Значи, виж и дефинициите в уикито за съответните типове.
Fraxi (2026-07-28 08:19:34+00:00): Оф.. с тия линкове. Хем рискуваш да излезеш неграмотен със запетаите след интервал(за да бъдат генерирани линкове), хем като добавиш една скоба и изпуснеш интервала, виж какво става... amenity=canteen съм имал предвид
Fraxi (2026-07-28 08:20:57+00:00): Btw, виж какво пише в https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=food#Known_uses_without_unknown_alternative_tagging
DressyPear4 (2026-07-28 13:01:59+00:00): Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/186518124
Správce (2026-07-27 16:19:13+00:00): Dobrý den, nepodařilo si mi propojit 2 cesty (potok a propustek) do 1 relace (Napáječ rybníka Černý Nadýmač). Mohu poprosit o pomoc?
rajdhani (2026-07-28 08:25:22+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186504385
DressyPear4 (2026-07-28 13:01:57+00:00): Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/186518124
MappingMore (2026-07-28 10:54:02+00:00): Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186511960
sveppur (2026-07-27 16:41:40+00:00): *Added the name
Wildsharky (2026-07-29 07:03:11+00:00): Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186511924
BCNorwich (2026-07-27 17:27:02+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The highways giving access to parking and garage areas are service roads. 

A road or path that does have access of some form cannot be said to be access=no; please only tag the actual restriction. It's very rare for a highway to have no access of any form.

I've made a few amendments.

Regards Bernard.
Oliver Bardsley (2026-07-27 17:31:11+00:00): Thank you, I'm very new to this so appreciate the feedback
Wildsharky (2026-07-30 06:40:20+00:00): Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186581502
neuhausr (2026-07-30 13:27:08+00:00): Hi, noticed you tagged a number of apartment buildings as residential landuse in this changeset. That's incorrect--they should be building=apartments. The buildings are within the Glen Oaks residential landuse area. Would you be able to fix these? Happy mapping!
ajmat (2026-07-28 10:48:13+00:00): Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186511589
literan (2026-07-27 19:22:54+00:00): в каком комментарии?
pitscheplatsch (2026-07-30 14:58:14+00:00): Hi Magic,

I think your revert has been "reverted". Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186638918

Best regards, Pascal
MagicPocketbook462 (2026-07-30 16:18:53+00:00): Hi Pitsche, thanks for the comment since I was keeping an eye on them. Considering they undid a whole business that is actually there and sent me no message, I'll contact the DWG.
DressyPear4 (2026-07-28 13:01:56+00:00): Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/186518124
InsertUser (2026-07-29 01:10:03+00:00): Please try not to spread changesets over multiple continents it it isn't strictly necessary.
dcapillae (2026-07-27 17:54:25+00:00): Hola.

¿El nombre del mural es «Patio Andaluz? Haría falta alguna referencia para verificarlo.

En OSM no ponemos nombre a objetos que no lo tienen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only.


Lo que sí podemos hacer es describir el contenido del mural usando la clave https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description

Por ejemplo, podríamos añadir «description=Mural sobre la puerta de un garaje que representa un patio andaluz, con un arco, macetas, flores y un limonero».

Atentamente,
Daniel Capilla
ErPepote (2026-07-28 19:36:49+00:00): El mural fue a petición de mi esposa, lo eligió ella y el nombre elegido fue "Patio Andaluz"
dcapillae (2026-07-28 19:44:14+00:00): Gracias por responder.

En ese caso, creo que bien podríamos dejarlo en «name».

Este mismo mural aparece en el mapa de monumentos conmemorativos y arte público de Málaga, un proyecto personal en que vengo trabajando desde hace algunos años: https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/es/map/monumentos-conmemorativos-y-arte-publico-de-malaga_855088?feature=node%2F9155468079#19/36.731380/-4.420538.

Gracias de nuevo.

Un cordial saludo,
Daniel Capilla
MappingMore (2026-07-28 07:10:01+00:00): Reverted in  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186501399
literan (2026-07-27 19:03:02+00:00): только, пожалуйста, не надо парковки и иные площадные объекты к линиям дорог приклеивать - нарушение топологии
DressyPear4 (2026-07-28 13:01:55+00:00): Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/186518124
DressyPear4 (2026-07-28 13:01:53+00:00): Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/186518124
rajdhani (2026-07-28 11:26:38+00:00): Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186513417
johnny_1982 (2026-07-27 19:41:52+00:00): Genau :)
Znaika (2026-07-27 20:23:11+00:00): ;-)
DressyPear4 (2026-07-28 13:01:51+00:00): Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/186518124
JakovBušić (2026-07-30 11:46:45+00:00): Way that was split unnecessary in this changeset has been merged back together in 186639552. #OptimoRoute
Dawid2849 (2026-07-27 19:03:02+00:00): Teraz jest drzewna ścieżka rowerowa :P
JakovBušić (2026-07-28 16:39:00+00:00): Content added in this changeset has been set right in changeset 186530119 #OptimoRoute
b-jazz (2026-07-28 15:34:27+00:00): FYI, the direction of the golf=hole centerlines is important. They should point from the tee to the green. I've fixed those I found on this court, but wanted to let you know for future edits you might do.
DressyPear4 (2026-07-28 13:01:49+00:00): Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/186518124
DressyPear4 (2026-07-28 13:01:48+00:00): Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/186518124
DressyPear4 (2026-07-28 13:01:46+00:00): Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/186518124
DressyPear4 (2026-07-28 13:01:45+00:00): Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/186518124
bxl-forever (2026-07-27 22:26:28+00:00): Hello,

FYI, as strange as it seems, most pedestrian routing engines consider bus platforms not to be routable.
Your change breaks access to platforms 2 to 5, in particular between those two nodes.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4592520601
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7473261705
Perhaps you might want to have a second look.
Thanks.
DressyPear4 (2026-07-28 13:01:44+00:00): Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/186518124
NieWnen (2026-07-29 23:20:24+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1545169369

Co tutaj jest? Chodnik, czy CPR? Bo aktualne tagowanie jest niestety nieprawidłowe. W przypadku chodnika należy usunąć bicycle=* foot=*
w przypadku CPR należy zmienić na highway=path i dodać segregated=*
Fasha4 (2026-07-30 11:22:48+00:00): Dzięki za wyłapanie błędu!
muralito (2026-07-28 00:02:25+00:00): ¿Estas considerando los peatones?
Josuer (2026-07-28 17:05:48+00:00): Hola muralito, sí. El único cambio que hice fue corregir el acceso que se dirige a la vía pública. Además de ligeros cambios de trazado, No hice modificaciones al tipo de vialidad que es Living Street. 
Si hice algún otro cambio que afecté a peatones puedo revertir el cambio y corregir.
Muchas gracias por tus observaciones y comentarios. Saludos!
wireguy (2026-07-28 10:55:41+00:00): hi Edanvangraff, welcome to osm!   thanks for adding pois.  I saw some syntax things that were off and fixed them.  Days of week are Mo Tu We, not mo tu we.  One website had a typo.   Added city info.   Keep mapping!   If you want to see the changes, they are here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186511938
O Fim (2026-07-29 11:50:42+00:00): Falou , falou mas não inseriu as etiquetas sidewalk:both=separate nas vias  ,favor revisar suas edições
O Fim (2026-07-29 12:23:09+00:00): Faltou ligação de calçadas com vias favor revisar
ftrebien (2026-07-29 14:46:51+00:00): Esta correção teve um escopo específico: remover barrier=kerb, que é incompatível com footway=sidewalk na mesma geometria, e remover height=* e ajustar surface=*, que haviam sido adicionadas em massa a partir de uma generalização sem verificação caso a caso.

A criação das ligações entre calçadas e demais elementos requer verificação caso a caso para garantir que as conexões representem a situação real.

A inclusão de sidewalk=separate nas vias principais não faz parte desse escopo. Essas etiquetas fazem parte do modelo de mapeamento por calçadas separadas, e o wiki as inclui como parte do procedimento de mapeamento nesse modelo:

> Mapeie cada passeio existente como uma linha individual com highway=footway + footway=sidewalk. A via principal também deve receber sidewalk:both=separate, sidewalk:left=separate ou sidewalk:right=separate, e opcionalmente foot=use_sidepath para indicar que os pedestres devem usar o passeio mapeado separadamente em vez da pista.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Passeios

Essas etiquetas, portanto, fazem parte da implementação desse modelo de mapeamento, e não são uma consequência da correção realizada neste changeset.

Adicioná-las neste changeset significaria ampliar a adoção desse modelo nas vias correspondentes. Embora ele seja documentado no wiki, sua adoção como modelo predominante para esta região ainda não foi objeto de uma discussão pública que resultasse em consenso entre os mapeadores locais. Na prática, isso significaria dar continuidade a uma mudança de modelo de mapeamento que ainda não foi previamente acordada entre os mapeadores da região.

Assim, considero que os dois pontos levantados não decorrem deste changeset.
O Fim (2026-07-29 21:18:16+00:00): Como comentou o FB ele usa o Street View para ver ae o mapeamento esta correto apesar da idade das fotos , quanto a etiqueta paved normal visto que a etiqueta concrete não cobre 100% dos caminhos porem ate mesmo aonde ele próprio conferiu pelo google , quanto a etiqueta height as calçadas tem 0,15 acima do nível da rua , então cabe uma revisão na exclusão em massa promovida pelo mesmo , o mapeador FT da sempre a mesma desculpa não arruma nada e perito apenas em exclusão .
O Fim (2026-07-29 21:20:20+00:00): como ele mesmo disse nunca visitou uma calçada e promoveu uma exclusão em massa sem revisar caso a caso talvez caiba uma reclamação.
O Fim (2026-07-30 06:38:26+00:00):  ftrebien e mentiroso e mau caráter , Primeiro a discussão não foi no grupo telegran São Paulo , e sim no grupo qualidade de mapeamento em segundo ninguém se pronunciou apenas ele e eu  terceiro ele mente dizendo que as etiquetas foram colocadas em massa , sugerindo que ouve vandalismo , as etiquetas foram inseridas ao longo de 10 anos , FT diz(A inclusão de sidewalk=separate nas vias principais não faz parte desse escopo) mentira isso também foi discutido mas convenientemente ignorada por FT alias que foi o principal tema pois segundo o mesmo calçadas não deveriam existir no OSM , então o comentario (Removidos de calçadas separadas: barrier=kerb (deve ser uma linha separada) e surface=concrete e height=0,15 inseridos em massa, após discussão no grupo OSM São Paulo no Telegram) deveria ser retirado da descrição ,  ftrebien apesar de estar no OSM desde 2011 pouco contribuiu e parece mais preocupado em perseguir colaboradores inclusive tentando conspirar com outros solicitando que outros reclamem no lugar dele visto que sua conta não esta mais com credibilidade e, considerada como birra com outros mapeadores.
ftrebien (2026-07-30 22:35:29+00:00): A discussão se iniciou no grupo Qualidade de Mapeamento, e a sondagem e aval referente à reversão das edições ocorreu no grupo OSM São Paulo. São grupos diferentes no Telegram. Nada no que eu disse em qualquer canal sustenta a afirmação de que "calçadas não deveriam existir", isso é uma deturpação clara e verificável do meu posicionamento. São válidos ambos os esquemas (como etiqueta na via principal, e como linha separada dela). O que eu apontei no grupo de Qualidade é que a execução incompleta da migração para o mapeamento como linha separada gera erros de roteamento pedestre.

Embora seja possível encontrar calçadas separadas mapeadas pelo usuário "O Fim" no período anterior, isto se resumiu a poucos fragmentos até 4 de janeiro 2022 quando o mapeador começou a mapeá-las em larga escala a partir do bairro Vila Maria (changesets 115763682 e 115757880).