piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
osmmapper222 (2025-12-08 20:19:12+00:00): Hallo JanitorOfHannover,

die Angabe der Öffnungszeiten vom Schreibwarenhandel wiesen mehrere syntaktische Fehler auf, die ich schon verbessert habe (andernfalls können Programme diese nicht verarbeiten).

Mehere Tage werden durch ein Semikolon getrennt, z.B. Mo 09:00-10:00; Tu ....

Mehrere Blöcke an einem Tag werden durch ein Komma getrennt, sodass der Tag nicht doppelt genannt werden muss, z.B. Mo 08:00-12:00,13:00-17:00

Es schlich sich auch Do für Donnerstag bei den Kurznamen des Tages ein.

Das OSM-Wiki bietet hierfür viele Beispiele: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours


Und mit dem opening_hours evaluation tool kann man die Syntax noch einmal prüfen: https://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/

Viel Spaß beim weiteren mappen.
TinPetreković (2025-12-12 08:38:28+00:00): The newly created node was removed in changeset 175835318 along with the tags that overstepped the boundaries set by posted signs.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175835318
mavl (2025-12-09 11:06:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 175707764 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the wrong name tag].
FajrAl (2026-07-19 06:36:04+00:00): You cannot translate the `Batang` and `Sungai` as `River` in English. These are all integrated toponym. What's your source for this?
mavl (2025-12-09 11:06:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 175707764 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the wrong name tag].
mavl (2025-12-09 11:06:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 175707764 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the wrong name tag].
mavl (2025-12-09 11:06:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 175707764 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the wrong name tag].
mavl (2025-12-09 11:07:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 175707764 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the wrong name tag].
Patchanka (2025-12-21 09:10:10+00:00): bonjour

merci pour les mises à jour.
Attention par contre, on ne met pas de nom si l'objet n'en a pas (ici par exemple il ne faut pas mettre comme nom "terrain de basket" qui est simplement la description de l'élément.

Voici quelques règles élémentaires à respecter : 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/images/8/87/Les_10_cOSMandements.pdf

Si vous avez des questions n'hésitez pas
Syl (2026-07-11 02:09:40+00:00): Bonjour, après vérification sur place j'ai supprimé ce nœud car il n'y a pas d'école de musique. Il s'agit seulement d'une personne qui propose des cours. Ce n'est pas vérifiable sur le terrain et ça n'a donc pas sa place dans OSM.
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2026-07-13 08:25:20+00:00): Bonjour, Merci pour cette vérification sur place  effectivement, sans plaque ni signalétique visible, ce point ne respecte pas le principe de vérifiabilité sur le terrain. Merci pour votre alerte et votre correction. Bonne journée
mavl (2025-12-09 11:06:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 175707764 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the wrong name tag].
mavl (2025-12-09 11:06:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 175707764 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the wrong name tag].
mavl (2025-12-09 11:06:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 175707764 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the wrong name tag].
TinPetreković (2025-12-15 11:38:36+00:00): Segments that were split have been merged back together and tagged accordingly in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175955242
Frank Peng (2025-12-10 03:26:07+00:00): I don't think this driveway should be tagged as an unclassified road since it serves school buses and a school. This should be tagged as highway=service and service=driveway. I think you have the tags wrong on the driveway way (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/752320461).
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Ddriveway
Frank Peng (2025-12-10 09:48:13+00:00): Also, I can see in the Bing Streetside imagery from 2021 that this driveway appears to be one-way based on signs on the ground. Did this driveway recently stop being a one-way road? What is the source for this? Thanks.
Frank Peng (2025-12-10 10:24:30+00:00): Also, please respond when someone comments on any of your changesets pointing out issues to you or requesting further information about your edits. This helps avoid issues and builds trust between you and other mappers on OSM. Users who never respond may be treated as less trustworthy. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Someone_commented_on_my_changeset,_what_should_I_do?

I and a couple of other mappers have commented on your changesets pointing out issues and requesting further information about your edits, and you have not responded to them. You can see your discussed changesets here: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=22361283
In the future, please respond when someone comments on any of your changesets pointing out issues and requesting further information about your map edits. This helps avoid a potential block on OSM.
Frank Peng (2025-12-16 03:10:11+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175909874
K12230LF (2025-12-10 12:25:05+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue sur OpenStreetMap.

Vous avez modifié 3 restaurants French Kiss, notamment celui de Bordeaux où vous avez indiqué son adresse à Paris et un code postal dans les Hauts de Seine : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13236318538

Etait-ce pour indiquer un contact sur Paris ou le lieu du siège social ?
Eklo Hôtel (2025-12-10 12:32:55+00:00): Bonjour, 
J'ai peut-être fait une erreur pour les modifications. Il n'y a pas de siège French Kiss. Il y a 4 restaurants French Kiss (qui appartiennent aux hôtels Eklo) : 
French Kiss Restaurant Paris : 1 rue du Moulin 92170 Vanves
French Kiss Restaurant Montpellier : 4 rue Jules Ferry, 34000 Montpellier
French Kiss Restaurant Bordeaux, 10 rue de la gare d'Orleans 33100 Bordeaux
French Kiss Restaurant Nantes, 63 bis boulevard de la prairie au duc, 44200 Nantes
Merci pour votre aide
K12230LF (2025-12-10 13:08:06+00:00): Effectivement, je vous confirme qu'il y a dû y avoir une erreur. 
Je vous laisse essayer de corriger celui de Bordeaux : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13236318538 et ajouter/mettre à jour celui de Vanves ? N'hésitez pas d'ailleurs à ajouter des éléments complémentaires qui permettraient de distinguer ces restaurants. Il y a de la documentation sur les attributs possibles pour les restaurants ici  : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:amenity=restaurant?uselang=fr
Eklo Hôtel (2025-12-10 14:54:33+00:00): merci, c'est mis à jour :)
NorthCrab_upload (2025-12-08 20:45:14+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9582337885
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/59309293

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2025-12-08 22:25:00+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9582337885
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/59309293

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
TinPetreković (2025-12-15 15:39:21+00:00): Segment that was split has been merged back together in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175967012
mavl (2025-12-09 11:07:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 175707764 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the wrong name tag].
mavl (2025-12-09 11:06:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 175707764 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the wrong name tag].
literan (2025-12-08 20:26:02+00:00): пожалуйста, остановитесь. Это не названия дорог, маршруты совсем не так наносятся на карту. Все эти правки придется откатить
Михаил Колодий (2025-12-10 16:44:43+00:00): Уважаемый literan ! Подскажите  пожалуйста как нанести маршрут на карту, У меня много пешеходных маршрутов (п.м.),но кроме этого способа ничего не пришло в голову.
mavl (2025-12-11 04:55:24+00:00): Просто для информации. В OpenStreetMap добавляют проверяемые данные. Другие люди должны иметь возможность убедиться в том, что добавленные пешеходные маршруты существуют в действительности.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B5%D1%80%D1%8F%D0%B5%D0%BC%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%82%D1%8C
literan (2025-12-11 07:09:28+00:00): Михаил, что означает фраза "У меня много пешеходных маршрутов (п.м.),"?

в OSM вносятся маршруты, существующие на местности и маркированные тем или иным способом (как "Дорога в Лавру"  или "Вело1" с указателями)
rhhs (2025-12-09 07:32:30+00:00): Hi again, what is your source for the stars= tag? It's usually only used for hotels and restaurants. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:stars
mueschel (2025-12-11 12:15:42+00:00): Hi,
what is the ID you added in "source:external_id"? Is this used as identifier in some external database? If so, you could use ref:ABC instead, where ABC is a (short) identifier of that database.
mavl (2025-12-09 11:06:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 175707764 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the wrong name tag].
user_5359 (2025-12-09 11:16:47+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1456925673. What is the mean of the tag état = ruine ?  You cannot mean the etat key (see https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/etat), as it has different values.
mavl (2025-12-09 11:06:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 175707764 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the wrong name tag].
kubahahaha (2025-12-08 15:53:42+00:00): Tak swoją drogą - czy wyraz "osiedle" nie powinien być małą literą?
mavl (2025-12-09 11:06:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 175707764 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the wrong name tag].
mavl (2025-12-09 11:07:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 175707764 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the wrong name tag].
mueschel (2025-12-11 14:25:31+00:00): Hi,
you used the new tag "current_situation" here - what does it mean?
Arflha (2025-12-11 14:41:23+00:00): Hi,
In the case of buildings with a complex history, this allows users to pinpoint the last modification made to the building. There's a note below explaining this: "1895 Mascara depot (TRT); 1968 expansion and conversion into warehouses; 2023 demolition of a northern section."
mueschel (2025-12-11 14:49:00+00:00): But wasn't the last modification in 2023 then?

In this particular case I'd suggest to add this using the date namespace:

building:1895-1968 = depot (or whatever the proper tag is)
building:1968- = warehouse

For dates of rebuilds or renovations there are also a couple of tags:

We already have a couple of tags:
year_of_construction
last_renovation
renovation_date
year_of_construction:rebuilt
Arflha (2025-12-20 11:56:22+00:00): Hi,
Sorry for the delayed response. The building was divided in two in 1968 and both were extended. The southern building has not undergone any changes since then, hence the current situation = 1968. The northern building had an annex demolished in 2023, hence the 2023.
Arflha (2025-12-20 12:04:38+00:00): I'm not very comfortable with date namespaces. The chosen format, TAG:DATE-DATE, is both imprecise (no month, no day) and unusable for querying and data processing. Furthermore, we already have start_date:namespace for that.

However, on reflection, the current_situation tag isn't descriptive enough; "latest development" would be clearer. This doesn't preclude using the tags you mentioned, though.
mavl (2025-12-09 11:06:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 175707764 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the wrong name tag].
HellMap (2025-12-12 12:27:39+00:00): Šajā izmaiņā gājēju pārejas nomainītas no luksofora pārejām uz tikai zebru, kas šajā vietā nav pareizi. Kas tieši šajā izmaiņā bija domāts?
HellMap (2025-12-12 12:59:40+00:00): Ļoti līdzīgas ir arī daudzas citas izmaiņas, kur pievienotas ne-luksoforu pārejas. Es pieņemu, ka nepareizi izvēlēts redaktorā. Lūgums apskatīt vērtības https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing un redaktorā izvēlēties atbilstošo uz nākotni.
mavl (2025-12-09 11:06:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 175707764 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the wrong name tag].
mavl (2025-12-09 11:06:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 175707764 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the wrong name tag].
eggie (2025-12-08 16:20:20+00:00): Dag Wim,

Hoe kan nu een pedestrian (voetgangersgebied) opeens een woonerf worden?

Daar is de maxspeed trouwen 15.
Het vlak is ook als voetgangersgebied getagd.

De straat gaat nu ook routeren voor autoverkeer.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-12-08 16:27:23+00:00): Reverted by changeset #175675656

Het lijkt me sterk dat dit voetgangersgebied waar je overigens mag fietsen is opengesteld voor regulier verkeer. 
Ik heb je wijziging voorlopig teruggedraaid,
Wat is je bedoeling?
Mocht je nog vragen hebben stel ze gerust.
Waarschijnlijk hoort hier wel delivery=yes nog getagd te worden.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-12-08 16:33:58+00:00): Het routeert gewoon voor fietsers
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_bicycle&route=52.253589%2C6.164532%3B52.252189%2C6.164237#map=19/52.252679/6.164151
Tjuro (2025-12-10 05:35:14+00:00): Hoi Wim en Eggie,

Ik kom hier wel eens langs en dit is bebord als g07 met uitzondering fietsers+bromfietsers.

Met vriendelijke groet,

Tjuro
eggie (2025-12-10 08:12:58+00:00): Oke Tjuro,

Ik heb moped en mofa=yes ook nog toegevoegd.

Groet,
eggie
mavl (2025-12-09 11:07:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 175707764 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the wrong name tag].
Andrea Musuruane (2025-12-09 14:20:45+00:00): Ho fatto il revert di questo changeset. Non c'è alcun ristorante che copre tutta quest'area che identificava tutto lo shopping centre.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175673774
mavl (2025-12-09 11:06:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 175707764 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the wrong name tag].
mavl (2025-12-09 11:07:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 175707764 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the wrong name tag].
nurdafur (2026-01-16 16:37:15+00:00): Hi Changchun
Ich lösche diese Relation wieder, die du da letzten Monat angelegt hast. Gerade heute bin ich die Strecke wieder gefahren. Da gibt es definitiv keine Makierungen.
Liebe Grüße
HellMap (2025-12-12 12:19:49+00:00): Sveiki,

Ar footway=sidewalk apzīmē tikai celiņus, kas ir gar brauktuvi un CSN izpratnē ir ietves ar īpašiem nosacījumiem. Parastus celiņus kā piemēram https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1065908822 it īpaši ārpus ceļu infrastruktūras kā ietves noteikti neapzīmē.
MassCartog (2025-12-08 15:54:29+00:00): *service roads.
mavl (2025-12-09 11:06:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 175707764 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the wrong name tag].
vasony (2025-12-15 19:27:00+00:00): Szia!

Postáknak saját irányítószáma van, ne írd át 7500-ra a 7501-et.

Köszi, Tamás
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2026-01-27 03:08:15+00:00): What source was used for this edit?
Cameron Ford (2026-04-14 19:59:43+00:00): It was incorrect I just discovered even though the lanes should be open in a year.
karto_monkey (2026-07-20 06:51:30+00:00): Should this relation be railway? If so, then it's missing the historic tags.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-12-09 23:00:43+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19140
Glassman (2025-12-08 17:29:06+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. I even verified street names with the counties records at https://kitsap-od-kitcowa.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/d11d0b008a544c7f8c6e9b35b6b41b22_0/explore?location=47.800706%2C-122.654862%2C16.96
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175674593
mavl (2025-12-09 11:07:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 175707764 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the wrong name tag].
vasony (2025-12-15 19:29:51+00:00): Szia!

Az hrsz. helye az addr:conscriptionnumber mezőben van, hrsz. szöveg nélkül.

Tamás
mavl (2025-12-09 11:07:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 175707764 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the wrong name tag].
mavl (2025-12-09 11:06:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 175707764 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the wrong name tag].
Baloo Uriza (2025-12-08 17:31:39+00:00): This camera appears to have been placed on the map in the middle of a driveway.  What's this camera mounted on?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175675063
カシオペア (2025-12-13 16:51:44+00:00): Why have you made multiple mass deletions with no explanations? To me this just seems like vandalism and I currently see no reason to not revert these
カシオペア (2025-12-13 19:31:57+00:00): Mass deletions including this one reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175894184
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-23 16:11:33+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with advertising/malformed tags and source=* of Google Maps, which is prohibited by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ), in changeset 184483756

https://osm.org/changeset/184483756
Carto'Cité (2026-06-11 14:10:16+00:00): Bonjour.
Tu as ajouté une relation stop_area https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19934493 qui fait doublon avec https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3920641. Tu as ajouté un périmètre de gare https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1456937604 qui fait doublon avec https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/704779307.
Y a-t-il une raison particulière ? 
Antoine de Carto’Cité pour SNCF Transilien
Carto'Cité (2026-06-11 15:43:30+00:00): Ok je comprends, tu as créé une relation stop_area_group. Ça ne me paraît pas adapté ici, vu qu'il s'agit d'une seule et même gare, avec le même nom et sur le même site. On n'est pas dans le cas de Montparnasse et Vaugirard par exemple. 
Le problème est surtout au niveau du périmètre de la gare, qui du coup exclut l'accès Boulevard Richard Wallace et meêm des escaliers et escalators : le périmètre doit contenir toute la gare car il est utilisé pour exporter les données de la gare. 
Ajouter les quais et points d'arrêet du tramway à la relation existante me semble plus adapté ici. Je peux m'en charger.
Antoine.
AurélienQ (2026-06-11 17:43:50+00:00): Bonjour, 

La façon dont je comprends la page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:public_transport ; c'est qu'il doit y avoir une relation stop_area par type de transport (version OSM, ici un pour le tram et un pour le train). Et chacune en correspondance reliées dans la stop_area_group.

Pour ce qui est des périmètres de gare, ma façon de faire était peut-être maladroite, notamment pour les défauts que tu pointes. 
Après réflexion (que tu as initié), peut-être peut on considérer ici qu'il n'y a qu'un périmètre commun, vu que les deux infras ne font presque qu'une ? On peut aussi mètre les entrées sur les deux, pour moi ce n'est pas gênant.

Mais garder les différentes relations (2 stop_area et 1 stop_area_group, à laquelle on peut en théorie ajouter les stop_area des bus) me semble important pour garder la logique du système.

Qu'en penses-tu ?
Cordialement,
Aurélien
DodoGTA (2025-12-08 16:30:22+00:00): Does the bar only have an indoor section in winter time?
eggie (2025-12-08 16:30:03+00:00): Welkom bij OSM,

Je info heb ik samengevoegd met de al bestaande adresnode.

MVG
eggie
JuanitoPapito (2025-12-08 16:45:17+00:00): Dankje!
eggie (2025-12-08 16:37:36+00:00): Juanito  Probeer bij te taggen op de bestaande adresnode.
Dan is het adres ook compleet.
MVG
eggie
JuanitoPapito (2025-12-08 16:54:47+00:00): Hoi eggie,

Wat bedoel je precies? Ik ben nog OSM noob dus ik snap niet precies wat je bedoelt.

Groetjes,
Juanito
eggie (2025-12-08 17:02:11+00:00): Hoi.. Je maakt een adres aan, maar er is al een adresnode. Ik heb eigenlijk geen idee of je die adresnode kunt selecteren en dan tags kunt toevoegen. Ik ben app.organicnoob. :)

Maar wellicht kan het. Ik heb hier de info al samengevoegd.

Met een reguliere editor als iD of JOSM op een PC gaat het in ieder geval wel.

Groet,
eggie
JuanitoPapito (2025-12-08 17:21:23+00:00): Mooi! Ik heb je welkomstbericht ontvangen. Dus die ga ik even rustig doornemen :)
En zal even kijken of ik de bestaande node kan aanpassen in Organic Maps ipv een nieuwe aan te maken.
FajrAl (2025-12-09 01:44:49+00:00): Silakan cermati komentar di changeset berikut:
changeset/175677139#c1522966
kitsee (2025-12-08 22:10:35+00:00): Hello oglord, thank you for contributing to Open Street Map. Unfortunately License of Royal Mail's postcode finder tool is incompatible with Open Street Map and as such cannot be used as a source. As such i'm reverting this change.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175688965