piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
bagis (2025-07-24 13:24:54+00:00): Som jag förstår https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sv:Key:access så kommer mer specifika värden (längre ned i trädet) användas om de finns. Så access=no "allt är förbjudet" + bicycle=yes "fast om du är cykel så går det bra ändå".
carlskroniten (2025-07-24 14:02:51+00:00): Alright, då är jag också med. Vill du korrigera det? :)
bagis (2025-07-25 12:48:42+00:00): Bör vara fixat med https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169452908
Jackalus (2025-02-20 14:58:29+00:00): Hi Alec,  I'm a Noob so may well be wrong, but I think that this should be a Relation, not a Way.  Other CAZs/LEZs are, for example, at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dlow_emission_zone#United_Kingdom
Alec Coates (2025-02-20 16:51:22+00:00): Hi Jackalus, I assume you are talking about the Newcastle CAZ. I didn't map this feature, I just modified it slightly while making other changes - it was originally added (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159749704) by goncalo_oliveira, feel free to reach out to them. I might take a look at this at some point if I get around to it. Thanks.
yelisey90 (2025-01-07 21:56:46+00:00): Hi! Have a look from this side: https://nakarte.me/#m=18/41.70743/44.77655&l=O&n2=_g/g/41.707223/44.776448/125.0/16.4/1.0

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161112722
eggie (2025-01-06 18:12:07+00:00): Dag Luna,

De discussie momenteel over het wel of niet verwijderen van rails.
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/niet-meer-bestaande-railways-mappen/122686/46
Denk overigens dat dit spoor niet meer bestaat.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-01-06 18:19:02+00:00): Je hebt een gebouw verwijderd. Waarom? Bewust?
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=161069330

en de laatste luchtfoto https://viewer.satellietdataportaal.nl/@52.71770,6.847272,18/?datastrip=20241130_PNEO-03

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-01-06 18:23:22+00:00): Je commentaar: corrected the speed of track 2 at nieuw amsterdam
Ik heb het gebouw teruggeplaatst.
NijntjeKnijntje (2025-01-08 17:42:28+00:00): Was me niet bewust dat ik een gebouw heb verwijderd. Excuses. Mijn bedoelingen waren om de plaatselijke snelheden op de sporen aan te passen naar de actuele situatie. Ik zal voortaan mijn veranderingen laten checken door een ander
eggie (2025-01-08 18:15:03+00:00): Hoi,
Zoiets gaat vaak ongemerkt. Je wil de kaart schuiven, maar dan selecteer je per abuis iets. Wanneer je dan op delete toetst verdwijnt het gebouw.
Selecteren en schuiven gaat helaas met de linker muistoets. Een manko van de editor.
Nog belangrijker is dat je niet knipt in de spoortlijnen met editor iD.
De routerelatie gaat dan stuk.
Ook als je een wissel verplaatst zul je rekening moeten houden met de routerelaties.
Dat gaat wel met josm, maar niet met iD.
Vandaar mijn eerdere opmerking over het gebruik van editor iD en routes.
Beter dus overstappen naar josm. 
Mapse
eggie
NijntjeKnijntje (2025-01-09 11:13:20+00:00): bedankt voor de feedback en de tips!
santamariense (2025-01-19 02:29:09+00:00): Olá Claudionor Silveira,

Dica: No OSM se considera que quando um ponto é tranformado em área, que a qualidade do mapa aumentou. O caminho inverso é uma regressão. 

Bons mapeamentos!
santamariense
KarlaIbrahić (2025-01-06 19:14:37+00:00): Reverted because node was created. #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161071351
YellowSoul (2025-01-07 08:36:42+00:00): si la licitación de proyecto es pendiente, no hay construction
MarinoBM (2025-01-18 21:46:08+00:00): Este conjunto de cambios ha sido revertido.
Peter Elderson (2025-01-06 18:58:07+00:00): Excuus, ik heb het over het hoofd gezien.  B edankt voor het aanpassen en melden; ik heb de nodes nu gemerkt met noto=nl_no_zebra dan verdwijnen ze van Emvee's QGIS kaart en kom ik er in ieder geval niet meer aan!
Famlam (2025-01-06 19:29:52+00:00): Jammer dat er dummy-tags nodig zijn. Hopelijk is er toch een betere oplossing mogelijk, anders moet elk (ver)bouwproject vol met notes gezet worden gedurende 1 à 2 jaar voor elk open dataset integratie-initiatief. (Idealiter zouden JOSM en iD waarschuwen als iets <x maanden geleden gewijzigd is, hoewel het voor degene in het oosten al bijna een jaar betreft, dus daar weet ik geen oplossing voor behalve PDOK 2024 gebruiken)

Graag degene in het oosten van de Weurtseweg (vlak voor de brug) dus ook niet meer taggen als zebra ;). Uit principiële redenen voeg ik zelf die dummy-tag niet toe.

Heb het ook even in het forum aangemerkt dat een fout-positief optie best praktisch zou zijn
Famlam (2025-01-06 19:30:09+00:00): Excuses aanvaard trouwens :)
Peter Elderson (2025-01-06 22:00:13+00:00): Die no zebra tag is niet heel gelukkig, inderdaad, maar ik zie geen andere werkbare oplossing. De "dummy tag" is inhoudelijk en verifieerbaar wel juist, en wordt door mij na dit invoerproject verwijderd, dus afzienbare tijd. Mocht er een nieuw bronbestand komen, dan begin ik er niet meer aan als er zo veel vals-positieven zijn.
aharvey (2025-01-07 01:26:55+00:00): https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/173411374

the tag is highway=cycleway not highway=cycleways

I'll fix this
VLD190 (2025-01-07 19:21:43+00:00): Hello aharvey,

Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I value my accuracy to the highest standards and I appreciate that you fixed the issue, and it will not happen again.

Best regards,

- David
Leo Slager (2025-01-06 22:28:11+00:00): De route van stationsplein-Zuidtangent richting Westtangent is gewoon open voor het verkeer.
Ook bus blauw rijdt daar gewoon.
Zie de dienstregelingen van de Hugohopper.

Heb je dat daadwerkelijk zelf waargenomen zoals je in het commentaar aangeeft ?
Leo Slager (2025-01-06 22:40:00+00:00): https://site.dijkenwaard.nl/stationsgebied/deelprojecten/bereikbaarheid-rond-stationsgebied

ik pas het even aan.
Leo Slager (2025-01-06 22:50:21+00:00): Het kruispunt wordt vernieuwd en is afgesloten tot eind maart 2025.
ika-chan! (2025-05-29 17:50:36+00:00): Hello, if a driver has to pay a toll to reach https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/69586068, then that road has to be marked as toll=yes. The Americana map renders toll information: https://americanamap.org/#map=14.96/38.02124/23.42784 - please see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:toll
ViewStreet (2025-06-01 18:53:43+00:00): This branch is exit without toll booth.
Drivers do not have to pay to exit the motorway.
ika-chan! (2025-06-01 19:17:46+00:00): Unfortunately, that is not a good reason to use "toll=no", given that a toll must be paid earlier to access that way, and there is no other way to get to that slip road without paying a toll. The way we tag toll roads should be like the diagram in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Greece/Highways#Toll_tagging.
ViewStreet (2025-06-01 20:42:56+00:00): I used an app with OSM data.
I mistakenly went through the 1st tolls, I payed but I wanted to use the motorway as long as it could be possible without paying again.
With the curent configuration that someone else changed, the navigator drove to the 1st exit, not the one that was the last free.
So all system must reconfigured.
ika-chan! (2025-06-02 08:58:35+00:00): Which app are you using? I am not sure how old the data the app is using. Either way, I think setting that exit slip to "toll=yes" isn't going to trick drivers into paying tolls.
ViewStreet (2025-06-02 09:13:06+00:00): Magic Earth, the data is up to date.
From the first exit and further the toll=yes tag should be removed or turned to no.
In current conditions the navigator doesnt drive me to the last free of charge exit.
I used it at A8 motorway from Elefsis that i payed tolls. Try by yourself the motorway to see how it works.
ika-chan! (2025-06-02 10:20:12+00:00): I ran a test journey from Magoula to Patras, and while Magic Earth is capable of detecting toll roads, it will not tell you where and how any times you need to pay the toll. In addition, it appears that the signage for the toll-free slip road before the first toll station at https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=38.042214&mlon=23.495700 is really dodgy: you have to keep to the rightmost lane to access that slip road.

If the results by Magic Earth is still tricking you into paying tolls, then you may want to file a bug report with them: we are trying our best to make the toll information as complete as possible, which can be seen at the Americana map, but not all routers detect toll roads, nor tell you where you must pay tolls.
ViewStreet (2025-06-02 11:41:45+00:00): In any navigator that uses OSM data, if the motorway is tagged as toll=yes continuously, the algorithm will not find any difference.
If there will be any tag toll=no, the algorithm will drive you to this part.
ika-chan! (2025-06-02 12:02:40+00:00): Can you please tell me what journey is causing the error? Because I also have Magic Earth.
ViewStreet (2025-06-02 13:18:53+00:00): I accidentally passed through the 1st toll station.
I didnt want to pay again.
So the navigator should show me the longest way to exit the motorway without passing through any toll station at exit branch. 
But since the motorway is continuously marked as toll=yes the algorithm didn't drove me to the last free exit. So the motorway shouldn't be continuously marked as toll=yes.
ika-chan! (2025-06-02 17:31:03+00:00): I am trying my best to make sure you do not accidentally end up at the first toll station in the first place. For example, at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/91896251 I have added destination information on what lane to use to reach the toll-free exit slip. It will take time for the navigator to pick up the new data. Please be patient.
dzidek23 (2025-01-07 10:13:09+00:00): Cześć, 
Ciekawy pomysł
https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=53.3777585&lon=14.6398801&zoom=20&camera.theta=53.357&camera.phi=-79.928

Na tyle ciekawy, że musiałem popatrzeć na google maps ;)

Myślę, że mógłbyś zrezygnować z relation i użyć building:part, pewnie byłoby trochę łatwiej.

Pozdrawiam,
Bartek
BartekChom (2025-01-10 04:42:04+00:00): Dziękuję, przepraszam. Zamiast dziurawej części jako relacja cztery z roof:shape=skillion, a do tego rozumiem, że muszę zapamiętać, że height to całość (odejmuje się roof:height, żeby dostać ściany, a nie dodaje, żeby dostać całość). Może teraz lepiej wyjdzie.
BartekChom (2025-01-12 17:57:55+00:00): Wreszcie jest to, co chciałem przedstawić, chociaż wyszedł mi strasznie popękany dach. Jeżeli nie ma sposobu na załatanie, to pewnie wiele nie wymyślę, przynajmniej aż znowu zobaczę ten budynek. „Na tyle ciekawy, że musiałem popatrzeć na google maps ;)”, czyli rozumiem, że muszę przeprosić za robienie maszkar, które wyglądają jak głupi żart. Dziękuję za zwrócenie uwagi na problem i za radę.
dzidek23 (2025-01-13 12:38:08+00:00): Cześć,
po pierwsze nie ma za co przepraszać, każdy z nas się uczy, a 3d w osm nie jest najłatwiejszym zadaniem. 
Po drugie, nie chciałem cię upomnieć tylko zwrócić uwagę na to, że warto popatrzeć na podgląd w czymś takim jak F4map.com czy osmbuildings.org żeby mieć "pewność" że wyszło jak należy ;)

Teraz ten budynek wygląda znacznie lepiej.
BartekChom (2025-01-13 20:04:17+00:00): Aj, przepraszam, zapomniałem, że mam odpowiedzieć. Chociaż i tak chciałem tylko wytłumaczyć, że sprawdzam, tylko zwykle mogę zobaczyć dopiero następnego dnia, a tym razem wróciłem na OSM dopiero w piątek, a zwróciłeś uwagę już we wtorek.
Yog Sot (2025-01-06 20:31:03+00:00): mogłeś to przynajmniej zrobić by pokrywało się z mapą, a nie tylko mniejwiecej ;]
MxxCon (2025-01-15 05:57:15+00:00): 🤦 for over a year I haven't noticed they were misspelled.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-01-06 19:41:17+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, zamień addr:place na addr:city. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12479199599
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12479231602
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12479231603
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12479231605
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12479231608
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12479231611
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12479231612
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12479231614
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12479231618
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12479231620
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12479231622
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12479231623
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12479231627
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12479231635
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12479231638
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12479231639

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eggie (2025-01-06 20:20:12+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-01-06 20:23:35+00:00): Dag GeoWol... Wat is je bron voor de loop van deze paden.
Wanneer ik de ingemeten kaart van de BGT bekijk lopen ze wel anders.

MVG
eggie
SerchoHJ (2025-02-18 11:50:35+00:00): En qué te basas para poner que la futura autovía A-11 está en construcción en ese tramo (tanto como en el resto que has añadido en la provincia de Zamora), como que es ese trazado previsto.
pitscheplatsch (2025-01-07 05:09:23+00:00): ok
pitscheplatsch (2025-01-07 05:09:34+00:00): ok
pitscheplatsch (2025-01-07 05:09:43+00:00): ok
pitscheplatsch (2025-01-07 05:10:12+00:00): Should be reverted.
pitscheplatsch (2025-01-07 05:10:31+00:00): ok
pitscheplatsch (2025-01-07 05:10:49+00:00): ok
cory171185 (2025-01-06 21:35:26+00:00): Forgot to include in sources; Lake County GIS map, for bounds of school grounds. https://lakecountyhub-lakeingispro.hub.arcgis.com/
pitscheplatsch (2025-01-07 05:11:34+00:00): Island exists, but the name?
SomeoneElse (2025-01-09 12:47:52+00:00): Hello,
After this edit there is a bit of a gap in the Saxon Shore Way https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8864#map=19/51.394665/0.563562 .
Does it follow the diagonal path or the footpath that cuts the corner?
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2025-01-14 13:07:34+00:00): No reply, so I've fixed this in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161344574 .
pitscheplatsch (2025-01-07 05:12:20+00:00): name?
BCNorwich (2025-01-08 11:30:28+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Can you please show or point out the verification as to the permitted bicycle access on these two tank tracks. If there is legal access for cycles I would think there is also pedestrian access. If there's no legal access by statute or permission then folk could face prosecution for entering. So as I said could you please verify the access.

Regards Bernard.
pitscheplatsch (2025-01-07 05:12:57+00:00): Island is ok. But the mapped features?
nevw (2025-01-07 11:55:34+00:00): Hi, can you fix this part of your edit please.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/393245389#map=19/-33.839161/151.237778
vasony (2025-01-07 21:18:09+00:00): Szia!

12-es pince nem egy házszám, más kulcsba tegyed ezeket. 
Más, hogy átjavítgattad az utcaneveket, milyen forrás van ehhez, a földhivatalnál biztos nem így hívják, hogy Szépasszonyvölgy, hanem úgy ahogy volt Szépasszonyvölgy utca.

T
efi99 (2025-01-07 21:25:56+00:00): Navik csak így találják meg, mert csak a házszámot lehet keresni azokban.
De van külön Szépasszonyvölgy utca feljebb és van a Szépasszonyvölgy külön, mint közterület. A Szépasszonyvölgy 35 pl a Márai Látogatóközpont legalul (cím a honlapjukon), a Szépasszonyvölgy utca 35 pedig egy családi ház jóval feljebb a lakóházaknál. (Földhivatalnál is így van amúgy).
A kettő között van a Disznófő sor, az ott lévő éttermek némelyikének van honlapja címmel, ahol ez szerepel.
pitscheplatsch (2025-01-07 05:13:29+00:00): #nonsense ?
Lostmonkey (2025-01-24 13:42:03+00:00): Is a camp site a camp site if it can not be used for tents, camper vans or caravans? Not according to the wiki description as far as I can tell: "Note that while camp sites might (or might not) include occasional building=cabin or other housing accommodation, those are neither required nor indicative of tourism=camp_site (which is defined by having pitches for placing tents and/or caravans/RVs),"
cyclist789 (2025-01-26 18:47:59+00:00): I agree. Feel free to change them to "Locality", or some other feature type instead.

If you do, please keep the other tags (tents=no; fee=yes; etc.) intact, in case someone changes their types again.
(And while you're at it, consider moving the "Camp Ruaha" node somewhat to the northwest. All 15 cabins north of Elefantsletten are part of it.)

Note that "Camp Masai Mara" is represented by two nodes; one north of "Savannen" (2+4+3 cabins), and one on the south side (8 cabins).
pitscheplatsch (2025-01-07 05:13:36+00:00): #nonsense ?
VLD549 (2025-01-29 17:24:49+00:00): Hi, I was asked to verify name changes.
It seems that the correct spelling is Willem Kesplantsoen, at least according to Wikidata.
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q19657090

Could you provide a link of some sort to show it to be different?

Thank you very much!
spughetti (2025-01-29 19:03:39+00:00): Thanks for reaching out before making any changes,

I checked the name signs, the name is "Willem Kes-plantsoen", I've added both other names to the alt_name tags and updated the Wikidata item.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161910268

Cheers
VLD549 (2025-03-14 15:02:11+00:00): Ok, thank you.
KartoGrapHiti (2025-02-17 11:28:33+00:00): Du hast im Bereich Unterer Hardthof vielfach Namen an Wegen eingetragen, die aber keine Straßennamen sind, sondern Beschreibungen der Funktion des Weges. Dies ist nicht sinnvoll. Hier ist beschrieben, wie man mit dem Eintrag Name umgehen sollte: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:name
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-12 18:44:27+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5577075239/history has rooms = 0 that was added in this edit
What was meant by this? That this object has no rooms? Seems surprising here
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-01-09 21:16:59+00:00): Did you mean to delete this supermarket? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/181802230/history
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161075613
Somepony (2025-01-13 00:46:41+00:00): Yes, as it has recently closed and the building (or at least the ground floor) is vacant. Though I should have reviewed them in more details my changeset before uploading. 
Should I edit the way and add the deleted keys back, but prefixed with "disused:" ?
Thank you
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-01-13 01:00:54+00:00): It should retain the building tag unless it's being demolished or no longer usable in which cases the lifecycle prefixes would be appropriate.
AndyB_66 (2025-01-07 14:17:01+00:00): Once again: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Jrachi (2025-01-07 09:31:50+00:00): Ciao.
Grazie di contribuire alla mappa più bella del mondo.
E di avere corretto il percorso di cui ho solo un vecchio tracciato gps.
L'ordine dei membri è da aggiustare, ma purtroppo iD non è adatto a lavorare sulle relazioni...
Ivo
maner (2025-01-07 21:58:31+00:00): Ciao,
eh, dopo averci perso 40 minuti sul posto per cercare il sentiero che da mappa doveva essere sul lato sinistro del torrente... meglio correggere prima che capiti ad altri.
Purtroppo non è la prima volta che mi perdo su relazioni Rete Patrimonio Escursionistico Piemonte (RPE) .
Ho verificato ordine relazioni ; non so se hai sistemato te, ma mi sembra corretto. Grazie comunque.
Massimo
Jrachi (2025-01-08 06:29:33+00:00): Si, ho corretto ordine e inserito due brevi tratti prima e dopo il ponte.
Nel tuo caso, di neo mappatore, avviso e modifico. Per evitare di perdere tempo ad aspettare la risposta...
Ti piace "perdere" tempo sulle relazioni? Di solito è l'ultima cosa che fa un mappatore esperto, è raro che venga affrontato da un novizio.
Il Piemonte è messo male?
Da un certo punto di vista, senz'altro.
Guarda la provincia del VCO. Dove non posso mettere le mani.
O meglio guarda il resto dell'Italia!
maner (2025-01-08 08:02:50+00:00): Ciao. Proprio novizio non sono, visto che mappo da quasi 15 anni,  anche se negli ultimi anni,  molto poco.
No, del Piemonte dicevo solo che sono state aggiunte varie relazioni "Rete Patrimonio Escursionistico Piemonte (RPE)" di cui alcune assolutamente inesistenti.
Vedi questa: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16778214#map=13/44.70931/8.67508  (che tra l'altro ho visto che hai aggiornato). Ad aprile ero andato a provare questo bel percorso che nel mio navigatore aveva addirittura il simbolo cai e... dopo 200 metri di bel sentiero, ho iniziato un calvario tra i campi,  ruscelletti da guadare  e lunghissimi tratti in mezzo agli arbusti, quasi tutto senza uno straccio di sentiero, fino a che, dopo una decina di km, mi sono rassegnato a raggiungere la statale e tornare indietro... Avevo poi chiesto info al mappatore e mi aveva risposto che era un sentiero a catasto, e che avrei dovuto segnalare le problematiche alle sezioni cai...
Jrachi (2025-01-08 11:01:47+00:00): Scusa se ti sono sembrato riduttivo.
Sul tuo profilo ho visto 167 modifiche e questa è la prima dopo 7 anni.
In Piemonte sono registrati 4926 percorsi, il 10% non sono mai stati rilevati ufficialmente, di questi ne abbiamo inseriti un centinaio perché avevano qualcosa già mappato in OSM.
Questo è uno di quelli.
Dove ci sono situazioni come quella che descrivi chiedo alla SOSEC di assegnare a quel percorso una priorità alta.
Ma i volontari scarseggiano,  la segnaletica sul terreno anche, per non parlare la mancanza cronica di manutenzione su moltissimi!

Io invito spesso i mappatori a segnalare situazioni come questa alla sezione CAI competente, o all'amministrazione comunale.

Complimenti alla tua perseveranza!
10 km sono moltissimi.
Pensa che ho visto escursionisti ritornare indietro perché un guado era immerso nelle ortiche!

In conclusione ti chiedo di continuare a mappare i sentieri e se hai dubbi chiedi tranquillamente.
Abbiamo creato una chat su Telegram per la mappatura outdoor se ti interessa continuare questo genere di mappatura.

Ivo
ⵣZiri_Atlasⵣ (2025-03-06 10:17:17+00:00): Hi,
Why do you remove the names written in Latin letters and replace them with Arabic names?
Fizzie-DWG (2025-06-29 02:50:59+00:00): DWG revert - invalid deletion of names in different languages

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168248825
NorthCrab_upload (2025-01-06 21:50:56+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/486639411
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/486639413

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
ⵣZiri_Atlasⵣ (2025-03-06 12:11:47+00:00): Hi,
look at
https://openstreetmap.org/way/80104791
https://openstreetmap.org/way/297092055
https://openstreetmap.org/way/484620281
ⵣZiri_Atlasⵣ (2025-03-06 12:16:35+00:00): https://osm.mapki.com/history/way/80104791
https://osm.mapki.com/history/way/297092055
https://osm.mapki.com/history/way/484620281
Emilius123 (2025-01-13 17:35:48+00:00): Hi Nakaner,

Die geplante Reaktivierung und die bereits im Fahrplan der DB vorhandenen Fahrten ab April sind dir bekannt? Würdest du das im Auge behalten und dann, ist die Zeit gekommen, wieder revisieren?

Viele Grüße
Emilius
Emilius123 (2025-01-13 17:35:59+00:00): *reversieren
martinst (2025-01-07 19:01:37+00:00): Why did you remove foot=yes of way 506108699 ?
sw_uwu (2025-01-07 19:19:41+00:00): Because it would override the access=private key.
martinst (2025-01-07 21:04:19+00:00): I think this was intended.
The last time I was there the path was open for public traffic.
sw_uwu (2025-01-07 21:12:43+00:00): I do not know the local area, I just changed the pre-existing deprecated private=yes tag to access=private as part of a tag cleanup. I wasn't the person that initially added private=yes.
martinst (2025-01-07 18:57:57+00:00): Why did you add amenity=hunting_stand ?
sw_uwu (2025-01-07 19:21:07+00:00): The name of this feature was "Jagdhütte", which directly translates to hunting stand. If this is wrong, feel free to revert
martinst (2025-01-07 21:00:46+00:00): "Jagdhütte" translates to "hunting cabin", not "hunting stand".
I will correct this in the near future.