piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2026-01-17 15:31:17+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13452602945 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Стоматологічна клініка"
---
Например, более нейтральная и фактическая версия вашего текста могла бы быть: "Стоматологічна клініка"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-25 07:50:29+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177671404
(Cleaned up leftovers from previous edits)
Endres Pelka (2026-02-15 22:57:01+00:00): Dlaczego usunąłeś tag building=school? Czy ten budynek został zburzony?
Graf83 (2026-02-15 23:22:10+00:00): W budynku nie ma już szkoły. Obecnie jest to placówka pomocy społecznej i dziennej opieki.
Endres Pelka (2026-02-20 15:10:46+00:00): No to building=public albo building=office, lub po prostu building=yes
Graf83 (2026-02-20 16:00:35+00:00): Zgadzam się. Mój błąd
maro21 (2026-01-13 20:28:21+00:00): Jakie jest źródło tej edycji?
maro21 (2026-01-24 14:28:58+00:00): Nazwa artykułu w Wikipedii to niekoniecznie jest egzonim. Egzonimy istnieją głównie dla dużych, znanych miast. Małe wsi nie mają egzonimów, a nazwa artykułu w Wikipedii nie oznacza, że tak się nazywa miejscowość w innym języku. Obecnie takie artykuły są tworzone przez boty i czasem człowiek ich nawet nie dotykał. W przypadku innych pism niż łacińskie nazwy są po prostu transliterowane, a tagi [name] w OSM nie służą do podawania trasliteracji, tylko egzonimów. Transliteracje mogą być wykonywane automatycznie w przypadku map w danym języku.
Jak dobrze znasz czeczeński i tatarski? Czy uważasz że wsi w Polsce mają czeczeńskie egzonimy? Czy miasta i wsie w Czeczeni mają polskie egzonimy?
Wsi w Polsce nie mają czeczeńskich nazw, tak samo jak wsi w Czeczeni nie mają polskich nazw.
NeisBot (2026-01-17 15:31:21+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/2977302026 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Agence marketing à Dakar"
---
Par exemple, une version plus neutre et factuelle de ton texte pourrait être : "Agence marketing à Dakar"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-25 07:50:30+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177671405
(No visible changes after review)
Bugrejder (2026-06-10 21:04:27+00:00): Merhaba, 
HGM Atlas üzerinden veri çekmek konusunda bir sorum olacaktı. Herhangi bir telif problemi yaşanıyor mu ve nasıl yapılıyor? Kısaca açıklarsanız çok memnun olurum.
Frans S (2026-01-15 17:26:02+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
I am reviewing your mappings and am sorry to say that your mapping skills are not sufficient to map  to map on these complex building situations.
Even high experienced mappers have difficulty accurately representing the buildings here. 
The combination of Hi-rise buildings , lower building blocks, and lower buildings makes it difficult.
Check here how hi-rise buildings ought to be mapped.

https://youtu.be/dsfUcslLtVc?si=yH6eWDbsb_ILAVb9
Please select easier tasks or projects to map. We (validators) have a lot of work to adjust your mappings on this project.
Best regards and keep mapping
Ny Andrianina (2026-01-16 08:25:27+00:00):  I'm sorry, I had a bad connection and the imagery was poor too
Félinx (2026-01-16 23:02:45+00:00): L'objet a bien été ajouté,  la modification est validée
SomeoneElse (2026-03-27 13:41:51+00:00): Hello,
Andy from OSM's Data Working Group here.  In this changeset you extended https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/938308562 via a series of nodes such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13452657355 .
First things first, it isn't a public right of way.  The one in this area can be seen at https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#17/51.14761/-3.08161/H/P .
In this changeset it is tagged as a "highway=path; surface=grass".  On its own, "highway=path" is not a useful tag.  It does not say what the path was designed for and it does not say what the access rights are.  It was subsequently deleted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179639561 saying that it was not, in fact, a footpath.
Although Strava's heatmap can be useful for adding things that you know are paths, you need to be careful as some Strava users have a habit of taking "short cuts" that don't match anything on the ground.  If someone on Strava has bushwhacked a path around a field it's not OK to add that as a "path".
Obviously, it's OK to add paths that are _not_ public rights of way to OSM, but it makes sense to ensure that access rights are set correctly (see e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1487223711 - although perhaps "foot=permissive" would have been better than "access=permissive".
Best Regards,
Andy
yelisey90 (2026-01-24 21:10:26+00:00): Вот эта точка странная, расположена в строящемся доме. Точно там или где-то в соседних всё же? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13452671733
Evgeniya_rocketdata (2026-01-26 08:00:33+00:00): Здравствуйте! 
При добавлении точек ориентировались на сайт, где и указано расположение https://pharmadepot.ge/ka/branches?keyword=%E1%83%95%E1%83%90%E1%83%AE%E1%83%A3%E1%83%A8%E1%83%A2%E1%83%98+%E1%83%91%E1%83%90%E1%83%92%E1%83%A0%E1%83%90%E1%83%A2%E1%83%98%E1%83%9D%E1%83%9C%E1%83%98%E1%83%A1+42&page=1
Мы уточним этот вопрос. Спасибо, что подсветили этот момент!
yelisey90 (2026-01-26 09:26:51+00:00): Предположу, что на гугле неправильно точку тыкнули. Адрес ვახუშტი ბაგრატიონის 42 у вот этого здания https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1136718178 , и в нём уже отмечено отделение Фармадепо: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11883871052
Evgeniya_rocketdata (2026-01-26 13:37:41+00:00): Получили ОС от клиента и вы были правы, передаваемые координаты оказались неверными. 
Данную точку https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13452671733 удалим. 
Ещё раз спасибо, что заметили и подсветили данный момент!
Ltrlg (2026-01-14 07:17:08+00:00): Ce serait bien d’avoir des commentaires plus précis qu’un simple hashtag très générique.
Manuel H (2026-02-14 13:38:18+00:00): Hallo,
du hast Teile der Relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3809795 bearbeitet. 
Darin war ein altes fixme mit der Frage, ob dieser Bach "Brummeckebach" heißt.
Du hast die Bestandteile alle "Bach am Kahlberg" genannt. (Die Benennung der Relation hätte dir etwas Arbeit gespart :D)
Die Frage ist aber nun, was der wirkliche Name ist? 
Kann es sein, dass er Brummeckebach heißt?
Ist "Bach am Kahlberg" der offizielle Name? Beschreibende Namen sollen nicht eingetragen werden und die findet man auch in offiziellen Quellen.  
Und der Berg neben dem Bach heißt "Kohlberg". Ist das ein Typo am Bach?

MFG, 

Manuel
yelisey90 (2026-01-13 19:16:53+00:00): Пожалуйста, поправьте ваш шаблон. В name:ru	должно быть не "Фармадепот", а "Фармадепо"
Evgeniya_rocketdata (2026-01-14 06:44:11+00:00): Здравствуйте! Хорошо, исправим, благодарим за ОС!
aighes (2026-01-13 23:46:04+00:00): Hey Trail_Caretaker,
it seems, you have joined in this change set a couple of ways, which had different tags. Especially the cycleway along Long Lake Road was split in sections to separate the sidepath from the crossing sections. 

I fixed this in changeset 177200060.
Trail_Caretaker (2026-01-14 00:00:21+00:00): Hi aighes, the path, when it crossed the sidestreets, where marked twice as a crossing.  Isn't that redundant?  It seems like marking a crossing once is enough.  That was my thought.
aighes (2026-01-14 02:11:54+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Foundation/Local_Chapters/United_States/Pedestrian_Working_Group/Guide
gives a good description on sidewalks, crossings and related stuff.

Btw. the new 2025 Oakland County aerials are out, which you might want to use instead of the 2023 version. Though seems iD hasn't updated the default layers yet
Trail_Caretaker (2026-01-14 02:35:19+00:00): When you say it is "out", what exactly do you mean?  I located it from the county government a couple of months ago after about 20 phone calls and 3 weeks of calling them trying to find out where I could get a copy.  I finally downloaded a copy but then I couldn't figure out how to upload it to OSM as a Background.  Even after asking people on OSM I couldn't get good step by step directions how to do it.
NeisBot (2026-01-17 15:31:23+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/285605187 v5

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Truck and jeep outfitters in Lexington"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-25 07:50:31+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177671406
(No visible changes after review)
NeisBot (2026-01-17 15:31:25+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13389342003 v4

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Auto parts and accessories store in Lexington KY"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-25 07:50:32+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177671407
(No visible changes after review)
rempshaener (2026-01-13 21:17:34+00:00): Hallo,
die Straße heißt jetzt "OASIS 31".
Dafür, dass highway=service meist keinen Namen haben, ist das ungewöhnlich.
Könntest du dir das noch mal anschauen?
Viele Grüße
eggie (2026-01-13 15:53:10+00:00): Dag gw...  'Ik ben er geweest'... Dat klinkt niet best.
Met adresnode kun je gerust schuiven.
Commentaar kan dan bv zijn .. adresnode gepositioneerd'. 

MVG
eggie
OpalSoPL (2026-01-26 22:15:42+00:00): można wiedzieć skąd pochodzą te nowe linie tramwajowe na zawarciu?
eggie (2026-01-13 15:14:59+00:00): Dag Adastra..

Alleen een naam doet niets in osm.
Ook de aard van het bedrijf toevoegen.
..office=....?
Gebruik de bestaande adresnode om op bij te taggen.
De descriprion wordt op deze manier als werving gezien en als spam behandeld.

Mvg
eggie
NeisBot (2026-01-17 15:31:29+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13432760961 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Marketingbureau in Drachten"

#MapWithoutSpam
pitscheplatsch (2026-01-17 15:34:58+00:00): Has been fixed by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177185411

Thanks @eggie
b-jazz (2026-01-14 16:16:34+00:00): FYI, golf holes don't have names, they have "ref" numbers. Please don't add "name" tags in the future. Thanks.
TBONE67 (2026-01-14 16:58:25+00:00): My apologies, I was under the impression that adding the name would help convert the holes when being brought into a tool for course design.
b-jazz (2026-01-16 17:05:02+00:00): People using golf simulator tools are often lead down the wrong path and make problematic changes to the map. I hope you aren't using Chad's Tool.
Kanton UR (2026-01-18 08:01:26+00:00): Guten Tag Urner93
Sind sie sich sicher das es sie hier um eine Öffentliche LKW Elektrotankstelle handelt ?
NeisBot (2026-01-17 15:31:32+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13452748654 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Plastic surgery clinic on Trinity Health Hospital campus Ann Arbor"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-25 07:50:32+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177671408
(No visible changes after review)
Dimitar155 (2026-01-13 20:10:14+00:00): Формата за мобилни телефони принципно е +359 (2 цифри) (3 цифри) (4 цифри). Двете цифри (87, 88 и 89) са кодове за отделните мобилни оператори.

По същата логика стационарен номер би бил +359 2 ... или +359 56 ....
Anonymous36863 (2026-01-14 07:25:51+00:00): Добре
qstep (2026-01-13 16:51:01+00:00): Hi, thanks four your edit! Correct format is disused:amenity=*

See wiki for details: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused:*

I have fixed it.
matthewCmatt (2026-02-09 21:42:06+00:00): rip
Andrea Musuruane (2026-02-01 17:14:41+00:00): Ciao. Questi edifici sono stati abbattuti?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177185091
Andre@1977 (2026-02-02 08:42:16+00:00): Ciao, si questi edifici sono stati abbattuti nel mese di Dicembre 2025.
NeisBot (2026-01-17 16:22:12+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13452777185 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Health practitioner office McKinney Texas"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-01-25 07:50:33+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/177587177
eggie (2026-01-13 15:55:55+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback   Je pad heeft geen aansluiting op pad De Woeste Polder aan de zuidzijde.
Dat routeert niet.  Probeer ook plakken te voorkomen aan de landuse. Je kunt dan later de kaart niet goed meer bewerken. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-01-13 15:58:09+00:00): Het pad heb ik doorverbonden en losgemaakt van de landuse grass
MVG
eggie
Paul Brandes (2026-01-13 16:00:22+00:00): Dankjewel voor de tips en het aanpassen! Paul
Hans Thompson (2026-01-13 18:53:48+00:00): great edits!
Vinber-Pro (2026-06-03 15:06:17+00:00): coucou,
sur un élément comme cela https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1451651615 je pense que l'on passe en access=private et pas de nom ?

ton avis ?
Brummelwuff (2026-01-13 18:56:53+00:00): Moin, 
du hast hier die Route 72-76 unterbrochen. Die Wege in der Kreuzung sind als oneway eingetragen.
nurdafur (2026-01-13 19:25:34+00:00): Moin
Da war tatsächlich noch was falsch. Aber an der Stelle habe ich eigentlich gar nichts geändert. Ich hab nur die Wege auf die richtige Seite der Kreuzung umgelegt. Aber jetzt hab ich auch noch einen weiteren Fehler bei den anderen Routen korrigiert. Da war die Rolle falschrum.
Ist nun korrigiert.
Danke, dass du dich gemeldet hast.
Brummelwuff (2026-01-13 19:33:52+00:00): hmm, die Route läuft immer noch gegen den "oneway" z.B. hier osm.org/way/891220297
nurdafur (2026-01-13 21:04:54+00:00): Jetzt hab ich das Problem gefunden, das du gemeint hast. Die Übergänge sind gar nicht oneway. Das habe ich übersehen, weil die mit dem unsäglichen oneway:bicycle=yes getagt waren. Leider gibt es viele Mapper, die der Meinung sind, dass das oneway=yes auch für Fußgänger gilt.
yrtimiD (2026-03-07 20:05:21+00:00): hi, when you add house numbers - there are two recommended ways:
1. add tags on the building polygon itself (easy and good for small buildings where entrance is easy to locate)
2. add a new node on the building polygon (not near, but part of the line) and add addr:* tags to it with extra "entrance=main" tag to mark actual entrance location (prefered for big buildings, for bildings with non-obvious entrance location or as extra effort while mapping)

the separate node address mapping is usually required only in case if building has more than one address (corner buildings), so the secondary (non-entrance) address can be mapped as such floating node)
SekeRob (2026-04-12 14:17:57+00:00): Hi bigpaolo

Can you tell me what the key 'ref:' is? You added this to this 'path' which actually has to be changed to  a farm highway=track as used by 4 wheel agricultural and the farmer's (4wd) car no doubt. Given surface=ground it needs to have tracktype grade4 or grade5. Routers do not allow motorvehicle use on these ways with the path value. The 'ref:' key has been applied 24x worldwide... think it is not correct, maybe something missing.

Please correct.
Happy mapping
SekeRob

PS I truly do not understand why all the hiker mappers put highway=path on these farm tracks and 99 out of 100 withoout grading. It misleads bicycle routers as well as without qualification they'll send racing bikes up these ways. Only tracktype grade4/5 stops this happening.
bigpaolo (2026-04-12 15:36:55+00:00): Ciao SekeRob,
I'm not very good.
Can you tell me how to fix these errors ?
Thank you

bigpaolo (Paolo Biguzzi Cesena Italy)
SekeRob (2026-04-12 16:37:16+00:00): Thanks for replying so quick. I now suspect you meant the ref: tag to be ref:id3king of which there are only 18 worldwide on OSM and then the value =279. I'll correct it when my mouse gets near the track again. (easy to find with JOSM)
TTYL
SekeRob
bigpaolo (2026-04-13 06:28:43+00:00): Ciao SekeRob,
Thank you from BigPaolo
stasiu512 (2026-01-13 21:29:16+00:00): Cześć, service=drive-through raczej słabo tu pasuje, proponowałbym service=driveway:)
czebureks (2026-01-14 19:31:02+00:00): Zmieniłem. Rzeczywiście "driveway" jest trochę lepsze, ale tak naprawdę na tych poprzecznych serwisówkach też nie do końca spełnia definicję moim zdaniem. Przydałoby się coś do samych podjazdów pod dystrybutory, tak jak jest "parking_aisle".
NeisBot (2026-01-17 16:22:13+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/637697130 v5

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Mattress store in Fort Wayne"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-25 07:50:34+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177671411
(No visible changes after review)
gscholz (2026-01-14 06:59:40+00:00): Hi casoum,
your recent edits in this region have left behind several broken relations:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=5.92484&lat=45.75963&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19952535/history#map=14/45.76667/5.89532

Can you please fix this?

I strongly recommend not to use ID to edit relations, use JOSM instead.
Kind regards
Guido
casoum (2026-01-14 16:49:16+00:00): Hi Guido,

I thought I understood what I was doing, maybe not so mutch...

I'll try to fix it.

Best regards,

Casoum
Muzz17 (2026-01-13 17:25:24+00:00): Hi GinaroZ! In your changeset you changed a lot of addr:city to the local place name. In the UK, the city corresponds to a royal mail post town. For example, the KY16 area should only have St Andrews as the city. Other surrounding areas should be tagged as addr:place, addr:suburb or even addr:village along side city. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses_in_the_United_Kingdom
Rainero (2026-03-20 17:49:22+00:00): Revert mit changeset/180170953
(unzulässige Quelle)
Amany_Ahmed (2026-01-14 09:21:32+00:00): Hello Bakr Al-kahlani,I noticed that you reclassified several residential roads and upgraded them to secondary roads, which does not seem consistent with OSM road classification guidelines.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=secondaryAccording to OSM rules, the secondary classification has specific criteria and is usually based on the road’s functional importance and connectivity, not only its width or appearance.Examples of residential roads that were upgraded to secondary:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/379777711https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1104176878In addition, you added some roads that are not visible in any available satellite imagery, yet they were tagged with a high classification (secondary) and directional attributes.Example:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1466791734https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1466794005Could you please review these edits, verify them against reliable sources or imagery, and correct the road classifications and added features where necessary?Thank you for your cooperation.Best regards,Amany Ahmed
5m4u9 (2026-01-13 23:45:37+00:00): Hola, bienvenid@ y gracias por corregir y mejorar el mapa!

Solo un comentario: En Bolivia, en casi todas las ciudades y poblaciones, los nombres de las calles lleva el prefijo "Calle", "Avenida", "Pasaje", "Callejón" o Boulevard. A menos, que el cartel de la esquina de la calle indique lo contrario.

Al lado izquierdo en el otro condominio, las calles llevan el prefijo. De todas formas ojalá puedas añadir los nombres y otros detalles.
Jorge Mauricio González Torrez (2026-01-15 13:29:20+00:00): Saludos estimado, buena observación, agregaré el prefijo Calle, si, evidentemente en los carteles del condominio cita "Calle Nogal" por ejemplo