piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
canfe (2024-07-03 06:35:36+00:00): Sarebbe bene come da regole wiki che il building abbia i suoi tag da building, mentre il supermercato i suoi da supermercato.
Tra l'altro così compare poi l'iconcina del negozio EuroSpin.
DnaX (2024-07-03 07:08:46+00:00): Ciao, intendi avere la way dell'edificio e un nodo separato per il supermercato?

Di solito, quando l'edificio è dedicato ad una sola funzione, metto i tag del supermercato sulla way dell'edificio.
canfe (2024-07-03 11:15:06+00:00): Sì così.
Deriva da questa regola:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element#:~:text=The%20principle%20one%20feature%2C%20one,have%20exactly%20the%20same%20meaning.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-08-23 09:02:09+00:00): Z https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/propozycje-zmian-kategorii-drog-wojewodztwo-dolnoslaskie-cz-2/117684/32 wynika że to multokonto użytkownika Temat-droga ( por https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5862 )
pio2_122 (2023-10-17 17:42:11+00:00): Krótkotrwałych remontów nie oznacza się poprzez zmianę kategorii drogi na highway=construction: "Already existing features may be closed for a short time for a temporary construction (e.g. old, damaged roads getting rebuilt). Don't use construction=* to tag such short-term closures (e.g. a road closed over a weekend to replace a sewer pipe); consider using conditional restrictions instead. As OSM data is often used offline (and therefore may be several months old), only tag construction sites if they are planned to be closed for at least six to nine months."

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=construction

Naprawione.
Joaquin1989 (2023-10-24 16:28:47+00:00): Hola, Por que borras el nombre de la edificacion, tiene el cartel puesto, por favor no lo borres
meioserrano (2023-10-29 11:59:40+00:00): Olá Teknoboy, 
Antes de mais, agradeço o interesse em ajudar a mapear a nossa zona, que ainda tem muito por fazer..
Se precisares de ajuda, p.f. dispõe seja comigo ou com a comunidade, que tem um ponto de contacto no Telegram, aqui:
https://t.me/OSMPortugal
Como tinha referido naquele fórum, eu vou tentando mapear também Ferreira, mas claro não moro lá.. Cumps
Layft Greater (2023-10-17 17:55:31+00:00): ISO/ELOT
OSMCowboy (2023-10-18 18:15:49+00:00): Correction: Source used was Esri World Imagery, Mapillary.
empty_child (2023-10-17 19:36:41+00:00): Hello
For this (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11270096166) - shop=party. And the name is too generic. If it's real, no problem
For this (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11270097070) - tones puri is a generic name, literally "bread from oven"
dr_alexandrov (2023-10-18 04:04:46+00:00): Hello!
I agree that those names are too generic, but there are no other signs on them.
Party shop photo can be found here -
https://maps.app.goo.gl/DKMX5GHt4ZTs9tZz9
OSMCowboy (2023-10-18 18:14:31+00:00): Correction: Source used was Esri World Imagery, Mapillary.
grzegorzmilosz (2023-10-17 18:48:56+00:00): W Lubinie występuje dziwna organizacja ruchu gdzie nagle na drodze o dwóch pasach ruchu w jedną stronę nagle pas prawy zamienia się w pas do skrętu w prawo z pominięciem ronda a kierowcy prowadzeni nawigacją ( w tym głosową ) na podstawie map OSM np: Mapy.cz mogą znaleźć się na niewłaściwym pasie i przy próbie jego zmiany może dojść do wypadku lub kolizji, to samo tyczy się węzła Lubin południe gdzie nawigacja podpowiada skręt tuż przy końcu pasa skrętu na ekspresówkę co również jest niebezpieczne. Myślę że w takich przypadkach bezpieczne podpowiedzi nawigacji są ważniejsze i w tym przypadku możliwe jest odstępstwo od zasad mapowania na rzecz bezpieczeństwa.
NorthCrab (2023-10-19 21:08:56+00:00): Na OSM nie mapujemy pasów na drodze. Do tego używamy tagów turn:lanes (w tym turn:lanes:forward, turn:lanes:backward), definiujących pasy do skrętu np. through|right (na wprost, w prawo). Aplikacje posiadają bardzo dobre wsparcie dla tego typu oznaczeń. Wartym uwagi tagiem jest także lanes, definiujący ilość pasów.
NorthCrab (2023-10-19 21:10:23+00:00): Tak z innej beczki, Dziękuję za bardzo dokładny opis zmiany :-) Rzadko się zdarza!
NorthCrab (2023-10-19 21:16:40+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1139268219
Oznaczyłem przykładowo jak to powinno wyglądać - osoby jadące w prawo nie wjeżdżają na rondo.
dónal (2023-10-17 20:10:20+00:00): More descriptive changeset comments would be appreciative. In this changeset it appears you updated the name:en tag for the hospital.
dónal (2023-10-17 20:14:11+00:00): See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments for guidance on what makes a good comment that will aid other contributors to understand the intention of the change. :)
stavrosP (2023-10-18 11:11:13+00:00): ty
skquinn (2024-05-10 20:32:31+00:00): Hi,

Please note that in OSM data, street names should not be abbreviated (i.e. "River Oaks Boulevard", not "River Oaks Blvd").
emersonveenstra (2023-10-18 11:08:13+00:00): Hi! Thanks for the edit, the only change i would make is that it's not correct for both the building and the point to have the same name. Usually when a building is only used by one organization like a church, you would combine those two by moving all the tags from the point to the building. An easy way to do this is holding down the shift key and selecting both the building and the point, right click and select Merge.

Hope this helps!
Mapiate (2023-10-20 12:54:44+00:00): Hi scbsnx, thanks for your contributions to OSM and the updates around Claremont. If you can in the future, please try to add the parking lot area and access details. That additional can help data consumers of OSM content to understand if the parking lot is open to the public or as an example, if it's restricted to permit holders or maybe employees of specific business.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142726260
Edelsalami (2025-01-13 09:14:27+00:00): Hi Schlumpfhasenbär, mir ist aufgefallen, dass du an vielen Stellen Furten erstellt hast, wo sich Fließgewässer und Wege kreuzen. Dort sind aber in den allermeisten Fällen keine Furten, sondern das Gewässer wird unter dem Weg verrohrt durchgeleitet. Bitte sehe doch in Zukunft davon ab, vom Editor markierte "Datenkonflikte" durch falsches Mapping lösen zu wollen. Wenn du Zeit und Lust hast, könntest du die eingetragenen Furten bei Gelegenheit auch korrigieren. Danke!
Gruß
Schlumpfhasenbär (2025-01-13 09:27:17+00:00): Hm... In der gemeinten Fläche bin ich nahezu alles mit dem Rad abgefahren, da wir Verkehrsvereinsseitig neue Wanderkarten erstellen wollen/wollten. Ich bin direkt hier vor Ort. Wenn das Wasser über den Weg läuft/gelaufen ist, habe ich Furt eingetragen. Man kann es teilweise sogar auf den Satfotos sehen. Sicherlich mir dabei ggf. auch der ein oder andere Fehler im Nachhinein unterlaufen, oder manche Bäche laufen nur temporär über den Weg...

Grüße zurück! :-)
Edelsalami (2025-01-13 11:39:20+00:00): Hi, danke für die schnelle Reaktion! Ok, das ist jetzt verzwickt - mit deiner Ortskenntnis trumpfst du natürlich andere Annahmen, die ich hier lediglich aus der Ferne treffe. Trotzdem halte ich es an den meisten Stellen für unwahrscheinlich, dass ein Bach tatsächlich über den Wege fließt. Das würde die Forstwege nämlich erodieren und das Höhenmodell zeigt meistens deutlich "Dellen" seitens des Weges und manchmal ist sogar die Rohrausleitung zu erkennen, so dass Erfahrung und Physik dort nahe legen würden, dass der Bach/das Rinnsaal verrohrt wurde. Wenn das im Einzelfall nicht so ist, dann korrigiere ich das natürlich, sofern du mir sagen kannst, wo das der Fall ist. Gruß
Skydehy (2023-11-22 06:05:40+00:00): Hi spughetti, I have sent you a message about this changeset.
tastrax (2023-11-22 06:07:45+00:00): How were the paths incorrectly mapped (or tagged)?
Cocoazi (2023-11-22 10:18:05+00:00): These pathways were created and used by the Digital Map Project (us, send dm for proof) in an on-campus mapping software created by the team. If possible, revert these changes so our application will work again and save us some trouble.
spughetti (2023-11-22 11:40:30+00:00): I've responded to Skydehy's message with my reasoning for deleting the paths but I'll post my response here as well.

"Hi, these paths were definitely not correctly mapped. There were paths mapped where no visible paths were visible, paths crossed one another without being connected, paths crossed through other features, etc. You can see in the changeset metadata that the deletion fixed 26 errors.

As you can see here (https://imgur.com/a/qQw9Bm2) there were many paths mapped in 1 open area, with no logic to it whatsoever. You can view the deleted data here (https://osmcha.org/changesets/142726449/).

While I don’t doubt that this project is valuable to a lot of students, it also contributed very flawed data to OSM. Which is also why I won’t be reverting my changeset. The data added by the students simply doesn’t follow OSM guidelines. Students should only use OSM for projects when the data they contribute to OSM actually aligns with its standards and methods.

I also saw that you changed the individual rooms I tagged as rooms back to buildings, this is not how you’re supposed to map them. As I said, if you use OSM for your project you will have to adhere to its standards and methods."
spughetti (2023-11-22 11:41:24+00:00): The changeset that tagged rooms as buildings after I had already fixed them can be found here.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144310840
Cocoazi (2023-11-22 11:57:10+00:00): Thank you for your response. I am personally not very experienced in OSM, but I will get the team to restart and fix the paths and keep your statement in mind; "There were paths mapped where no visible paths were visible, paths crossed one another without being connected, paths crossed through other features".
spughetti (2023-11-22 13:06:29+00:00): Sounds good! If you'd like I could also help with mapping some of the paths if it doesn't interfere with your project.
spyderkavin (2023-11-23 01:09:16+00:00): Hello! What were wrong with some of the building labels? I thought the room number labels adhered to OSM guidelines. 
Also, what if we make a layer of pathways that include custom routes in the school, as well as Escuela Pkwy, Ariona Ave, and the unnamed street north of the campus.
spughetti (2023-11-23 14:30:45+00:00): I'm personally not the most knowledgeable about indoor mapping but the indoor=room tag seems applicable to these rooms.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:indoor%3Droom

Buildings aren't supposed to cross each other, so tagging individual rooms within a larger building as buildings will cause errors.

I just looked at the new paths that were added and they're still crossing other features.
https://imgur.com/a/Xy69CPs

When a path crosses under a building or skyway please use layer= tags to indicate which features are above and below one another.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Layer

You can also see that paths are crossing through gardens. Please make sure that the paths are mapped around other features so they don't cross each other.

Could you give me some insight as to how these paths are being mapped? Are they drawn manually or are they imported from GPS traces?
daganzdaanda (2023-10-25 22:26:32+00:00): Hallo Bachl2023, 
willkommen bei OpenStreetMap! Schön, dass du mithilfst die Karte zu verbessern! 

Bei OSM gibt es oft verschiedene Möglichkeiten, eine Sache einzutragen. Hier hast du die Sporthalle als Punkt (node) eingetragen:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11270166124
Allerdings war die Halle schon als "Weg" (way) in den Daten: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/220492365
Leider stellt der iD-Editor auf der Website das Gebäude nicht besonders auffällig dar, man muss also die Gebäude-Umrisslinie anklicken um die Tags zu sehen.
Ähnlich war das bei Elektro-Hufsky und dem Kindergarten... Und die  Zoohandlung war schon an einem Punkt am Gebäude-Rand eingetragen, was iD auch nicht mit einem Icon darstellt.

Das macht alles gar nichts, ich hab die Dubletten entfernt. Es gibt immer noch viel zu ergänzen und verbessern, auch in gut gemappten Gegenden wie hier ;-) 

Bei Fragen helf ich gern, oder du schaust ins Forum: https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/de/56

Viel Spaß beim Mappen!
Servus, daganzdaanda
felipeeugenio (2023-10-18 17:21:29+00:00): Hello.
Sorry, but those footways are visible in which picture?
these mapillary pictures I took less than a month ago show nothing.
regards

https://www.mapillary.com/app/user/Kaart_Local?lat=-39.787407670034&lng=-73.211683427778&z=12.276474449584807&trafficSign%5B%5D=all&mapStyle=OpenStreetMap&pKey=1095610224737493&focus=photo&x=0.46713710249892565&y=0.6628737838126206&zoom=0
Tzene19 (2023-10-19 21:45:56+00:00): Hello felipeeugenio, thanks for bringing this to my attention! From Mapillary the brick portion of the traffic island appeared to be a pedestrian crossing but after revisiting this area I now see there are no painted crossing lines. I have restored the data to how it was originally. Happy Mapping!
felipeeugenio (2023-10-20 13:09:43+00:00): ok, thank you very much.

It is amazon how there is no crossing there... but it isn´t.

regards
mkopinsky (2023-10-18 15:30:39+00:00): You seem very uncertain with your tagging. (It seems fine to me, but I'm not well versed in tagging of museums and historic stuff.) I suggest joining OSM US slack or posting on one of the forums so you can feel more confident in your work. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contact_channels is a good list of places for this.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142726712
lipuma (2023-10-18 11:52:15+00:00): 'changes'? What kind of changes? Please add meaningful changeset comments!
Especially when your edits span almost 4 continents.
Metzor (2023-10-18 13:37:34+00:00): And a reminder to the general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: 

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

 Why? Have a look at the section 
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
SzymonH (2023-10-18 05:44:04+00:00): Fikcja. Wycofane: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142743049
BikePC (2023-10-17 19:37:17+00:00): Waarom o.a. bicycle=no op een highway=primary? Dat is toch default?
A67-A67 (2023-10-17 21:25:12+00:00): Nee, op een highway=primary en lager zijn geen default verboden. Alle vervoersmiddelen moeten dus aangegeven worden.
BikePC (2023-10-18 05:18:40+00:00): Okayyy. Dank voor de toelichting.
muralito (2023-10-17 22:59:05+00:00): Gracias. Probablemente haya que mapearlo como shop=convenience. Para shop=supermarket es dificil que clasifique por la escasa superficie.
Mapiate (2023-10-20 13:20:26+00:00): Hi scbsnx, thanks for adding these buildings. Some these buildings appear to qualify for building=commercial or building=industrial instead of building=yes. Please see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building If you have questions or need support, just reach out. Happy mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142727041
scbsnx (2023-10-25 18:32:04+00:00): Thanks Mapiate for this feedback - I have made fixes to building types to be more specific to this area in changeset #: 143129627
eggie (2023-10-17 20:30:16+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Tomas_J (2023-10-18 18:19:09+00:00): Ahoj, 

za mna: skvela praca. Nazov urcite pomoze uzivatelom mapy pri identifikacii studnicky. Po par dnoch/hodinach bude nazov viditelny aj napriklad v mapy.cz.

Tomas
kwiatek_123 (2023-10-22 14:20:42+00:00): Mam kilka uwag odnośnie zmiany dot. kładki pieszo-rowerowej nad Wisłą.

1. Ona jest nadal w budowie. Po prostu połączyła ostatnio oba brzegi ale prace nadal trwają.

2. To nie może być highway=cycleway skoro mogą się poruszać po niej piesi. Więcej informacji na wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Rowery

3. Ani w tagach ani w opisie zmian nie podałeś źródła dot. długości i szerokości kładki.

4. Twoje opisy zmian "aktualizacja danych" nie precyzują tego co zmieniłeś. Lepiej zmiany podzielić na mniejsze i je odpowiednio nazwać. Na przykład "Dodanie informacji o wymiarach kładki", "Ukończenie budowy" itp.

Jeśli nie masz pewności co jak oznaczyć to poszukaj na wiki lub zapytaj na discordzie czy forum.
itineris (2023-11-07 09:32:49+00:00): Szia!

A hetényegyházai bringaút elkészült? Akkor felesleges a construction=yes címke.
Ha még nem készült el, jobb lenne a construction:highway címkét használni.

Üdv:
Ákos
nargoth (2023-11-07 10:09:41+00:00): Elkészült, de nem adták át. (Végigteketem.)
A szentkirályi bringautat, amin végigmentem bringával, valaki átállította const.-ra. Ezért rajzoltam így.
Fene se igazodik ki  néha ezen, kinek mi a jó. :)
itineris (2023-11-07 10:15:55+00:00): Az mindegy, a helyi Fontosember járt-e már kint fényképezkedni.

Ha a gyakorlatban járható, akkor kérlek, töröld róluk a construction-t!

Üdv:
Ákos
nargoth (2023-11-07 10:33:23+00:00): Törld pls. én nem tudok most fogalkozni vele.
NieWnen (2023-10-18 17:36:55+00:00): Bo było błędnie dodane obok i powstały 2 Corrado :P Ale dzięki za wyłapanie. 

Odpowiadając: to jest jak najbardziej restauracja – mają całkiem dobre "normalne" dania.

Poprawiłem i zaktualizowałem: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142774390
4004 (2023-10-22 22:47:34+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:natural%3Dcliff Для обозначения оврагов и земляных обрывов используйте natural=earth_bank
Для балок используйте тег natural=valley + valley=balka (Данный тег используется, но не одобрен. Балка не имеет четкой границы из-за очень слабого или прекратившегося эрозионного процесса, а потому геометрия такого объекта с большим трудом может считаться верифицируемой.)
Для обозначения рукотворных насыпей и валов следует использовать man_made=embankment.
FOXY44 (2023-10-30 21:55:23+00:00): Thanks Chris for this it has improved the cycle routing in Komoot  no end for this road .  New to OSM editing and was going to try and fix and now I can see hoe to do it. Thanks Paul
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-12-22 15:39:30+00:00): Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11270479238 even existing? Both linked websites are broken
Shaun das Schaf (2023-10-21 15:44:29+00:00): Hallo,

kann man hier auch etwas einkaufen, oder befindet sich hier nur ein Lager und der Hauptsitz?

Viele Grüße
Shaun das Schaf
Goods Discount (2023-10-22 09:59:24+00:00): Hallo,

Aktuell ist es nur ein Versandlager. Wir arbeiten aber daran das man Produkte abholen kann.

Grüsse
Goods Discount
MarcoR (2023-10-19 18:59:51+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM!

Your changeset is fine; just two observations:

1) Diet: should be used for dietary options only (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:diet:* for more info);

2) Personally I would have not have written the name all uppercase but if the place name is written like that on the road sign, I think it's fine.

Happy mapping,
Marco.
streckenkundler (2024-11-30 21:05:02+00:00): Hei, du hattest mit diesem CS z.B. in Werbig Straßennamen rückgeändert. 
Ich habe das hier wieder geändert.  In Werbig heißt die ehemalige Jüterboger Straße wirklich "Werbig - Jüterboger Straße" Vergleiche Georeferenzierte Adressen Brandenburgs, vergleiche Webatlas-Daten, vergleiche Mapillary: z.B. https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=873631314260534 
Das war von chriss66 bereits korrekt erfasst... den alten Namen hab ich nach old_name verschoben. Bitte unbedingt hier in Brandenburg alle nutzbaren Datenquellen zwingend beachten!

Danke,

streckenkundler
Friednauerin (2024-12-01 17:29:43+00:00): Hallo, die Straße heißt - wie auch auf dem Straßenschild steht - Jüterboger Straße. Aber weil die Amtsschimmel sie sonst nicht von anderen (Jüterboger) Straßen in Brandenburg unterscheiden können, haben sie in den genannten Karten diesen Kunstnamen verwendet. (Die haben ja nicht so einen netten is_in-tag wie OSM.) Ich hatte also damals nach einer Radtour alles korrigiert, aber da es mir persönlich egal ist lasse ich Deine Änderungen stehen, auch wenn es nicht den Vor-Ort-Tatsachen entspricht.
streckenkundler (2024-12-01 18:07:08+00:00): Guten Abend, die Vor-Ort-Tatsache hab ich doch gezeigt... (Mapillary-Link). Für mich ist das alles Straßenname... Das steht auch so in der Webatlas-Karte und im Liegenschaftskataster: https://bb-viewer.geobasis-bb.de/?layerIDs=237,9001,9000,159,149&visibility=true,true,true,true,true&transparency=0,0,0,0,0&center=375836.4256499951,5754634.473294081&zoomlevel=12

Auch die brandenburger Adress-Daten (vgl. mvt-Layer vom User hfs; nutzbar mit JOSM) zeigen diese doch recht seltame Schreibweise.  Amtschimmel? Hm... ja, die produzieren manchmal ihre Eigenheiten...  Das es auch anders geht, zeigt der Nachbarort Borgisdorf (selbe Gemeinde). Schuld ist aber auch die Post, die es mit Gemeinde + Ortsteil nicht auf die Reihe bringen, das dann ordentlich zuordnen zu können. Dann verbiegen sich Gemeinden, um es idiotensicher zu machen und das kommt dann dabei raus...

Sven
OSMCowboy (2023-10-19 14:21:42+00:00): Correction: Source used was Esri World Imagery, Mapillary.
muralito (2023-10-17 22:54:56+00:00): Hi. Please explain why you add foot=no to these ways.
HurricaneGator (2023-10-18 21:45:04+00:00): Hello muralito, thanks for catching this! After taking a second look at this area, it looks like there is a sidewalk for pedestrians along https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/191079812 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/317290206. I will remove those foot=no tags. Thank you for pointing this out and happy mapping!
muralito (2023-10-19 20:09:44+00:00): Thank you. Please keep in mind that in Uruguay pedestrians and bikes are allowed by the law unless there is en explicit sign  stating the prohibition. And a group of organized cyclist defends it. Obviously, altouhg is really dangerous  because of the differences in speed, its allowed, and most of the time pedestrian and cyclists use the  shoulder facing the motor vehicles.
HurricaneGator (2023-10-23 17:43:44+00:00): Hello muralito, thank you for the input and clarification. Happy mapping!
olo81 (2023-10-18 18:28:13+00:00): zdublowane nazewnictwo, do poprawy
olo81 (2023-10-18 18:29:28+00:00): Przecież już jest dodane centrum kulturalne, po co drugie?
olo81 (2023-10-18 18:33:33+00:00): Wywalone
OSMCowboy (2023-10-19 14:22:28+00:00): Correction: Source used was Esri World Imagery, Mapillary.
Glassman (2023-10-18 18:00:47+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142732397
Glassman (2023-10-18 18:01:45+00:00): When a business is one of many in a building, just use a node for the information. I removed the duplicate building and left a node with the brewery info.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142732397
muralito (2023-10-17 22:53:21+00:00): Hola. El nombre viejo ya esta en la etiqueta old_name. Cada render tiene decision sobre que hacer con ese dato. 

Ponerla como vos hiciste duplicada en la etiqueta "name" es una practica no aconsejada de mapear para el render. Ver https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Etiquetado_para_el_representador
Glassman (2023-10-18 18:21:09+00:00): #TIP: to add a pedestrian way, just tag a line as highway=footway and for the section over the pond, just tag that as highway=footway + bridge=yes + level=1

Also, it is a friendly practice to modifying existing objects rather than deleting and redrawing them. That same the history of the object.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142732652