piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NorthCrab (2022-12-28 15:07:41+00:00): Hmm, in that case I found this:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dmanufacture
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Acraft%3Ddressmaker
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Acraft%3Dtailor

If none of the above suits this place, maybe a generic craft=clothes will? It's not documented and very rarely used.
NorthCrab (2022-12-28 14:52:54+00:00): This use of area:highway is incorrect. Please read the documentation here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:area:highway. Area is used in addition to the line, you cannot use area alone because it's not routable.
NorthCrab (2022-12-28 14:54:48+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1125369300/history
This looks like a street-side parking instead of a parking lot.
Cheers!
KMadura (2022-12-28 15:08:24+00:00): there are three parking spots there, area in front of Solaris entry is concrete, I will revisit this area later
DUGA (2023-01-08 14:30:51+00:00): Under no circumstances would anyone change the road from service road to cart path. You can even see vehicles parked there.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/924381179/history#map=19/39.34295/-77.19079
Golf_Rulez (2023-01-08 18:04:17+00:00): You are correct.  I will not do that again.
pboscherini (2022-12-28 16:25:57+00:00): Hi,
mueschel,
do you INSERT on database 'disused' ?
The previous record is 'disused:bank'.
It seems a complex management to 'navigate' the datatype version !!!

We suppose you know the number of the join with the string 'disused:bank'.
At now, the number of the join with the tagrowid 'disused' is 0 (zero).

Thanks regards.
Piergiorgio.
map per (2022-12-31 13:53:22+00:00): Concerning "Review my changes":

Looks good. I ,however, don't know how to add the opening hours of the bakery either. If the bakery is run by a different company than basic one can add a separate node for the bakery.

Best regards
map per
wkdgs (2023-01-06 14:13:48+00:00): I like your solution with "opening_hours:bakery". However, if you want to get other opinions on this, you could post this to the German OSM forum: https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/de/56
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130594699
ALu68 (2022-12-28 23:16:02+00:00): Hello kartalakopang,

with your edits of the last days you created double & tripple overlayed building object.

A number is not the name of the building.
DUGA (2023-01-08 03:42:00+00:00): Please explain the naming reason for that path.
marczoutendijk (2023-01-08 09:22:25+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6736
 
Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
Golf_Rulez (2023-01-08 18:05:17+00:00): Which path?
marczoutendijk (2023-01-08 18:52:11+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/68522718
Ginger Lover (2023-01-08 20:06:11+00:00): You mean "GOLF PATH" ?
DUGA (2023-01-08 20:18:24+00:00): This question can be ignored
SekeRob (2022-12-29 06:31:42+00:00): 2hi

2 problems with your path
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1125377838
First its mapped on top of a track
Second it crisses a stream area inferring rhere is a dyke, a bridge, a ford or the art of walking on water is now common.
Please correct.
BR1 Cassio (2022-12-29 09:09:07+00:00): Thanks for reporting, the error is due to the fact that it is not a river area but a practicable landslide (see trace). Now that's correct.
NorthCrab (2022-12-28 13:19:41+00:00): Dodam słowo wyjaśnienia różnych kombinacji:

use_sidepath + separate = dane wskazują że należy poruszać się "sidepath" który jest oddzielony od głównej drogi

no + separate = bardzo podobne co do 1 kombinacji chociaż mniej "idealnie" ponieważ w dokładnym rozumieniu to poruszanie tym ciągiem jest całkowicie zabronione, większość aplikacji potraktuje tą kombinację jak 1.

separate = większość aplikacji potraktuje to jak 1 i większość osób to tak zostawia ale niektóre niszowe aplikacje mogą tego nie rozumieć i nie jest to idealne

use_sidepath = pieszy musi iść sidepath ale nie ma informacji że jest on oddzielony na mapie, jest duża % szansy że będzie wizualnie prowadzić drogą ale pieszy dostanie informację aby nie szedł jezdnią

Trochę dokumentacji:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:foot
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sidewalk

Bardzo podobnie rozumowany jest system dla rowerów.
Frans S (2023-01-12 09:29:04+00:00): Hello. We welcome you as a new mapper. 
I review mapped tasks to see if they are correct mapped. 
A few remarks.. Before you uploaded your work, you should have seen the messages on the Issue triangle on the right side. These issues should be solved before you upload your work.
You did not connect mapped roads to other roads. This is important because we are building a road network which need to be connected to each other, were possible
Best regards and keep mapping
eggie (2022-12-28 12:19:44+00:00): Dag Gijs... accesstagging is best lastig.
Denk niet dat het helemaal klopt wat de voorgaande mapper heeft toegevoegd.
access=no is bijna altijd fout icm met andere accesstags. .. Zal wellicht vehicle=no voldoende zijn?
Welk bord staat er vooraan?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-12-29 07:49:58+00:00): access=no heb ik verwijderd van de Jufferroute.
MVG
eggie
GijsBbb (2022-12-29 12:46:22+00:00): Dag eggie, lijkt me correct. Het is inderdaad een traject van het Jufferpad over particulier terrein. Ook praktisch echt niet toegankelijk voor fietsen tenzij je de fiets over de opstap wilt tillen;) Op het bord staat dat ook alleen het uitgezette klompenpad toegankelijk is voor alleen voetgangers. Ik heb access voor paarden dan ook op no gezet. Stond op ja.
eggie (2022-12-29 12:52:21+00:00): Hoi... Formeel zou het op access=private kunnen met dan foot=permissive
Mapse
eggie
NorthCrab (2022-12-28 13:26:03+00:00): Witaj, poprosiliście o weryfikację.
Zgodnie ze sposobem mapowania parking_space - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=parking%20space.
Parametry miejsc parkingowych powinny być umieszczone na relacji: "Add tags for common properties for all parking spaces (like, surface, fee, covered, access restrictions…) to the site relation and not each individual element. Only properties that differ from the values tagged in the relation should be tagged on the parking space element directly.". Inaczej przyszła edycja każdego miejsca parkingowego to będzie katorga. Pozdrawiam!
fabiotofy (2022-12-28 20:38:39+00:00): Con la buonasera, ti segnalo che negli indirizzi con esponenti in lettere (es. 16/F) questi vanno inseriti in OSM senza barra e con la lettera minuscola (es. 16f). vedasi: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Addresses#Regole_specifiche_per_l.27Italia ciao ciao
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130598164
Sandro De Sabbata (2022-12-29 10:44:27+00:00): Ho sistemato non sapevo. Grazie
Sandro De Sabbata (2022-12-29 10:44:56+00:00): Ho sistemato non sapevo, grazie.
eggie (2022-12-28 12:24:22+00:00): Hoi    Sinds kort is de wiki aangepast..
parking:orientation is nu gewoon orientation=
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:parking%3Dstreet_side
MVG
eggie
Rienk Mossel (VRG) (2022-12-28 12:35:54+00:00): ok aangepast, 
Gr Rienk
eggie (2022-12-28 12:39:11+00:00): Top.... kwam er van de week ook pas achter.
Mapse
Eggie
adiatmad (2022-12-29 11:51:12+00:00): Hi, good work on your edits!
You added objects with uncommon tag, like "q=yes" around here
(https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1125392412). Could you please double-check it?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130598692
Danysan95 (2023-01-07 15:06:41+00:00): Ciao, ti segnalo che la prassi standard quando si creano dei percorsi composti da molti pezzi di tipi diversi (inclusi i percorsi escursionistici) è inserire nel campo "name" delle singole linee solo l'eventuale nome di quel pezzo di strada, mentre il nome del percorso va inserito nella relazione che contiene tutte le linee.
Questo per evitare situazioni in cui una strada finisce per avere due nomi perchè appartiene a due percorsi diversi.
Trovi più informazioni nella documentazione ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:CAI#Percorsi_escursionistici , "tutte le informazioni riportate nella tabella sotto devono essere nella relazione e non nei campi dei vari segmenti che la compongono").
In questo caso il numero CAI è già nella relazione https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1288894 con il tag ref=717, quindi il nome non servirebbe nei singoli pezzi di sentiero.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130599460
marcorove (2023-01-09 19:15:50+00:00): Ciao, quindi, nel caso in cui ci siano tratti di strade o sentieri che non hanno un nome cosa faccio? Lascio il nome vuoto e inserisco "Anello della Lama di Montefune" nella relazione? Grazie
Danysan95 (2023-01-10 14:01:31+00:00): Esattamente
archie (2023-01-09 13:12:49+00:00): This steet (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1125396916/history) don't exist! Your imaginary street streches over established soccer-fields and over several  buildings.
Your comment to this cs is about adding missing names. But this is not truefull at all. You have created this fantasy street (according to node-history of street you are the only editor of this street). 
As you have done a lot of editing in Sweden, I wonder, how many streets like this did you insert in osm? 
This inserting a fantasy street and commenting as adding name to an existing street is a bit like vandalism, isn't it? 
Does this represent Microsoft Open Maps quality?
Aleksandar Matejevic (2023-01-09 15:08:36+00:00): Hi archie, thanks for reporting this issue. 
The road has now been removed.
However, this is not vandalism, this is an accidental copy and offset of the road https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/111490069 
There was no intention to create a wrong road on the map, it was a pure accident, which I agree should not happen, but it did. 
We are not doing any automated imports, so human error can be expected. We are running checks after we finish the task and this would be picked up and would be removed, but thanks for keeping an eye, we really appreciate the community involvement. 
I have checked all roads created or edited by magrej and have found only this one to be an error, so I would not call this a quality issue, but sure an issue that has been now solved. 
BTW magrej is my colleague and he is a huge fan of Sweden, he has been traveling a lot of times to different places across the country and he even learned the language, so feel free to contact him and send him the community-created tasks, so we can jump in and help.

Hope this answered all the questions, but if you have more concerns feel free to comment.

Best regards, 
Aleksandar Matejevic
archie (2023-01-09 15:13:20+00:00): The thing is, I stumbled upon this (https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=130599571) by accident. This is not a tiny stretch of road mistakenly inserted, but rather an autostrada. And the information is given to us that this "new" highway is founded on "survey"!  
So I wonder if and how many new Microsoft fantasy roads were made in Sweden under the latest months. cs-comments were given as to "adding of names", but this is aparently not true. 
So good folks, check if you got some new Microsoft fanatsy road in your neighbourhood.
Aleksandar Matejevic (2023-01-09 15:17:31+00:00): I will do the check also ASAP and inform you of the findings
archie (2023-01-09 15:22:48+00:00): ok, thanks. My second comment was sent before I had the chance of reading your explanation. 
Thanks for checking for any further errors!  That's a relief!
I have som resentment of part of your language. "but thanks for keeping an eye, we really appreciate the community involvement" sounds as though openstreetmap is mainly managed by Microsoft and then there are those who belong to the community at the sideline, and who sometimes deserves thanks for their commitment. 
By this comment - a Freudian slip - you have revealed what you think of those who work for free with openstreetmap.
Aleksandar Matejevic (2023-01-09 15:58:21+00:00): I see no reason for such resentment, but you certainly have a right to it. All edits on OSM can be verified by all users around the planet, but only a few users actually do this, so that's why I said THANK YOU for keeping an eye, but you certainly have the right to understand it however you want. I don't want to deepen the unnecessary discussion that deviated from the topic, which is the quality of the map. When I finish the check I will inform you about the results.
archie (2023-01-09 16:11:39+00:00): Thank you for checking for further possible errors! As I wrote earlier I stumbled over this by pure accident as I was about to set name-tag to the soccer fields and kindergarten. I did not actively keep an eye on your edits. Would be nice to hear from you, that this incedent was the only one of its kind.
Aleksandar Matejevic (2023-01-11 17:12:44+00:00): Hi archie, we have done a check of all 46130 highways that have been created/modified by our editors in Sweden and I can confirm that this one was the only error. 

We have removed one more road that we have added just because we were uncertain of its existence on the field https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131110158 so maybe someone local user can add it.
archie (2023-01-11 18:12:01+00:00): Ok, thank you for checking this!
Danysan95 (2023-01-07 14:44:46+00:00): Ciao, grazie per i contributi, ti segnalo che se questa è la sagoma di un edificio non è corretto rimuovere il tag building. Al massimo se è in rovina puoi sostituirlo con historic=ruins + ruins:building=yes *.  Per quanto riguarda i tag place=isolated_dwelling e name="Lama di Montefune", vedo che a pochi passi c'è già un nodo con place=locality e name="Lama di Monte Fune" °, quindi aggiungere le informazioni anche qui crea un duplicato; se credi che isolated_dwelling sia più appropriato di locality conviene che lo sostituisci nel nodo e non lo aggiungi sull'edificio.

* più info in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ruins

° questo nodo: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6205991448
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130599578
marcorove (2023-01-09 19:13:26+00:00): Ciao, guarda un po' se ho corretto bene, grazie. Altra cosa: quel "Lama di Montefune" inserito come zona non popolata mi sembra non abbia molto senso, per due motivi: 1 allora bisognerebbe inserirlo nella maggior parte del territorio, 2 è pieno di lupi. Forse sarebbe meglio inserire questa avvertenza se ce ne fosse la possibilità.
Danysan95 (2023-01-10 13:58:48+00:00): Si, l'edificio va bene.

Per quanto riguarda il "bisognerebbe inserirlo nella maggior parte del territorio" riferito al place=locality non mi è chiaro cosa intendi. Se intendi che la maggior parte del territorio non è popolato, per "località non popolata" si intende una zona che abbia un nome ben conosciuto (l'importante è che sia una "località", il fatto che sia "non popolata" serve solo per distinguerla da altri tipi di località mappabili come place=isolated_dwelling).
In effetti però se "Lama di montefune" è il nome di questo edificio e non il nome genrico di questa località sarebbe giusto eliminare il nodo locality lasciando solo l'edificio *.

Per il fatto dei lupi, non sono a conoscenza di nessun tag per mappare questa informazione. L'unico tag vagamente correlato è hazard=animal_crossing, ma serve per mappare un segnale di pericolo di attraversamento di animali sulle strade, non la presenza di animali in una forseta.

* Altre info su questo tag sono in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Tag:place=locality
Holle Hollnagel (2022-12-28 13:27:33+00:00): ein wunsch vieler Bürger, die ein Ausflug nach Landskrone machen wollen, ganzjährig
wkdgs (2023-01-06 14:06:51+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.

Ich habe mir deine Ändeurngen angesehen, weil du das Kästchen "Meine Änderungen überprüfen" angeklickt hast.

Dieser Änderungssatz hat leider ein paar Probleme.

Hauptsächlich geht es um den "name"-Tag. Dieser ist nur für die Eigennamen von Objekten gedacht, nicht für Beschreibungen oder zusätzliche Informationen. (s. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen)

Für Beschreibungen, die Kartennutzern zusätzliche Informationen geben sollen, ist der "description"-Tag gedacht. Für Informationen, die sich an andere Mapper richten, gibt es den "note"-Tag.

Außerdem hast du einen Weg hinzugefügt, der dort bereits eingezeichnet war. In einem solchen Fall kannst du die zusätzlichen Informationen einfach an den bereits existierenden Weg schreiben.

Die Probleme hat wohl schon jemand anderes behoben. Du brauchst hier also nichts mehr zu unternehmen.

Gruß
winkeldings
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130600202
joost schouppe (2024-01-16 15:26:58+00:00): Hi,
You gave https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7748217142 an end_date. Does that mean it has been disactivate/removed? Please use a lifecycle tag like razed:power so that it would disappear from a set of active wind generators
limes11 (2025-02-02 08:47:30+00:00): Hallo geraunz,

was meinst du mit dem end_date hier ? Wird die Turbine seit 2022 nicht mehr betrieben ? Steht sie noch ?

Ich finde nur Hintergründe zu den Problemen und der zeitweisen Abschaltung im Zeitraum 2015-2018 im Netz.

Vielen Dank
NorthCrab (2022-12-28 14:45:17+00:00): Witaj na OpenStreetMap!
Mówisz "ten jest do usunięcia" to dlaczego go nie usuniesz :P?
Pozdrawiam!
wp7650 (2022-12-29 21:01:41+00:00): To mój pierwszy raz, nie wiem czy mogę XD
Pzdr
NorthCrab (2022-12-29 21:07:44+00:00): Tak długo jak nie usuniesz przypadkiem pół autostrady to powinno być git
wp7650 (2022-12-29 21:10:19+00:00): Już dałem do usunięcia
pluton_od (2023-02-02 14:42:14+00:00): Здравствуйте, nikolaysh.
Реклама в теге description запрещена: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description. Пожалуйста, не добавляйте рекламу.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130601728
Holle Hollnagel (2022-12-28 13:25:48+00:00): wer will auf ein Radweg neben der Autobahn radeln
wkdgs (2023-01-06 14:15:12+00:00): Ist "Gemeinde Werder" wirklich der allgemein verwendete Eigenname des Weges? Falls es eher eine Beschreibung oder Zusatzinfo ist, könntest du besser Tags wie "description" oder "note" verwenden.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130601784
Fizzie-DWG (2023-01-18 22:28:52+00:00): Hi Aleksandar. Thanks for fixing this building. When you do fix stuff like this, or the other building that you reverted completely, could you please leave a Comment on the original Changeset to say what you've done, & why? It makes things much easier to follow & try to sort out later! Thanks, Graeme Fitzpatrick, OSMF Data Working Group
Aleksandar1994 (2023-01-19 14:28:27+00:00): Acknowledged, we will look into it. Thank you!
Best regards
Aleksandar1994
ottwiz (2022-12-28 14:18:18+00:00): Oh hey SamuelH123000! 

Welcome to the OSM! Thanks for improving Ohio!

If you want to get to know the OSM community more and get some tips and tricks on mapping, I suggest both the Discord and OSM US Slack community as a starting point:
https://discord.gg/openstreetmap
https://slack.openstreetmap.us
Fiszi37 (2023-11-13 15:06:07+00:00): Dzień dobry
Proszę nie dodawać track-ów na osiedlach mieszkalnych (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1125410431) czy domków letniskowych. Od tego są inne tagi highway=living_street lub highway=service + service=alley
hauke-stieler (2023-01-24 22:07:20+00:00): Hi,

zwei Anmerkungen zu deinen Änderungen:

1.) Du hast einen Neubau samt Straßen nahe der S Stellingen entfernt. Ich weiß nicht warum, aber das Gebäude gibt es wirklich und ist fast fertig. Ist habe daher diesen Teil deiner Änderungen rückgängig gemacht: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131670716
2.) Eine Garage (way/921836369) hast du mit "building:part" gemappt, allerdings ohne umschließendes Gebäude. Building-Parts werden verwendet um einzelne Teile eines Gebäudes (die z.B. mehr Stockwerke haben) detailierter zu mappen. Drum herum muss es aber ein Polygon mit building=* geben. Diese Änderungen hat westnordost bereits angepasst: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/130623921

Grüße
Hauke
DCA (2023-01-25 06:31:21+00:00): Was da war, war das alte Gebäude. Es wird ein komplett neues gebaut und als ich da war, war es deutlich nur noch halb so lang wie zuvor. Hinten wird weiter gebaut, aber das wird ein zweites Haus, das man dann, wenn fertig, erfassen kann. Das alte Haus war jedenfalls komplett weg und vom Grundriss falsch, daher entfernt.
DCA (2023-01-25 06:34:07+00:00): Das mit der Garage muss dann ein Versehen gewesen sein, sorry.
mariotomo (2023-01-05 20:33:15+00:00): Hola. Me parece mala idea, reutilizar un objeto para otro objetivo. Has considerado que estás creando una historia sin sentido lógico?
Nordpfeil (2022-12-30 10:24:24+00:00): Could you have a look to your tagging:
>> "maxspeed:30 = 10" <<
maxspeed:type = DE:zone30
on five streets around 
Groothusen, Gerd-Mensen-Str.
luziferius (2022-12-30 12:53:34+00:00): oops. Thanks for the notification. This is a user error. in Josm on my side. It should be "maxspeed=30" on all of these.
luziferius (2022-12-30 14:31:46+00:00): Corrected to maxspeed=30 in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/130689554

Thanks again for the review.
frosm (2024-09-10 17:04:34+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1125418220#map=19/45.915019/6.152239
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4619684#map=19/45.915100/6.152062
quand vous créez un trottoir, pensez à mettre des nœuds communs avec les routes traversées.
Cordialement
NorthCrab (2022-12-28 15:01:43+00:00): Hey,
Please avoid features duplication.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1125419210
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10291486525
Both of them are mapped as amenity=kindergarten, thus from the data point of view there are 2 kindergartens. Please use the area if the exact is known, or a point otherwise. Also, mark the kindergarten building with building=kindergarten. Cheers!
KMadura (2022-12-28 15:09:45+00:00): Thank you, fixed that
NorthCrab (2022-12-28 15:03:08+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1125419953/history
Parkings here look like street-side, not parking lots.

Cheers
KMadura (2022-12-28 15:12:22+00:00): Fixed that, thank you
pitscheplatsch (2022-12-31 09:46:29+00:00): revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/130484486
NorthCrab (2022-12-28 15:14:23+00:00): Witaj na OpenStreetMap!
Proszę zastosuj któryś z udokumentowanych standardów start_date: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:start%20date. Dłuższe opisy możesz ustawić w polu description= (opis).
Pozdrawiam!
DP24PH (2022-12-29 01:25:45+00:00): Yikes! You have uploaded a changeset with multiple countries (i.e. Philippines and Thailand) which might cause inconvenience to our fellow OSM editors across ASEAN Region. Kindly reduce your changeset size on per country basis.


DP24
NorthCrab (2022-12-28 15:16:33+00:00): Czy ta nazwa nie jest z lekka przydługa? Uważam że mało prawdopodobne jest aby lokalni za każdym razem wymawiali dokładną datę śmierci :P

Proponuję:
name=Pomnik nagrobny Zygmunta Grotowskiego
description=Kamienny pomnik nagrobny Zygmunta Grotowskiego zmarłego 19.12.1889 roku.
Cazeck (2022-12-28 15:38:41+00:00): Słuszna uwaga.
NorthCrab (2022-12-28 15:39:34+00:00): Hello, you have requested a review.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29564799
This road has already a oneway:bicycle=no tag (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:oneway:bicycle).

You shouldn't mark the cycle road separately if it's on the same road.
NorthCrab (2022-12-28 15:40:42+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/954044027
This way is missing this tag.
Satotiga (2023-07-15 06:12:57+00:00): Ace job creating all the various walls of Castle Acre Priory - it looks great.