piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
CAI Stabia (2023-02-26 07:57:23+00:00): Giovanni, provo ad analizzare e a risponderti sui numerosi punti da te enunciati.

L'affermazione che hai fatto riguardo l'obsolescenza e l'inattendibilità delle tavolette 
 IGM è errata.
L'Istituto Geografico Militare (IGM) è un istituto che svolge le funzioni di ente cartografico dello Stato italiano, ai sensi della legge n. 68 del 2 febbraio 1960 occupandosi della cartografia dello Stato. E' quindi il riferimento cartografico ufficiale, aggiornato frequentemente, ultimamente anche con i dati OSM: vedi https://www.igmi.org/it/dbsn-database-di-sintesi-nazionale

Che significa che sei dotato di GNSS? GNSS sta per Sistema di Navigazione Globale Satellitare, quindi ogni ricevitore satellitare per la navigazione è un GNSS, anche il più scadente inserito in un cellulare economico.. Tu non citi marca e modello dello strumento che utilizzi per rilevare i sentieri..

Riguardo le tracce inserite su monte Comune, ti espongo una mia personale valutazione dettata dalla particolare morfologia del luogo: è un'altopiano prativo (privato per lo più), adibito a raccolta fieno e pascolo delle mucche. Un sentiero ha senso se conduce da un punto A ad un punto B. Le tracce dei trattori o dei camion che vanno in giro sull'altopiano, o quelle di chi porta a zonzo un cane, seppur presenti sul territorio, non meritano di essere segnate perchè sono effimere (variano di anno in anno) e  non sono di nessuna utilità per gli escursionisti, addirittura controproducenti perchè possono indurre in errore.

Riguardo le tue passate modiche al Molare, stendo un velo per carità: addirittura avevi erroneamente spostato un Punto Trigonometrico!

In ultimo ti invito a modificare la 
 tua abitudine di commentare i changeset usando il tuo nome e cognome. Ogni changeset, dovrebbe indicare il dettaglio delle modifiche da te effettuate, cosi come indicato in:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Good_changeset_comments

Spero che tu voglia valutare positivamente queste critiche costruttive, al fine di migliorare sempre più la nostra esperienza di mappatori OSM.
bradrh (2023-02-22 03:47:05+00:00): Why did you add motor_vehicle=yes to this track?  It is not on the MVUM, which means it is not open to motor vehicles.
onxmaps_jazzymichelle (2023-02-22 16:05:08+00:00): CPW has this open to motorized vehicles in their 'CPW Trails Shapefile' under the Administrative Boundaries group. https://www.arcgis.com/home/group.html?id=a9490456f04f4a3aad8ff590ba5de33d#overview
bradrh (2023-02-22 17:51:14+00:00): Nice resource, I didn't know about that one.  I think I found what you're looking at in the Trails_COTREX*.shp.  That contradicts USFS data, I'll send an inquiry to cotrex to see what they say.
bradrh (2023-02-22 18:18:31+00:00): My mistake, the MVUM was updated last year and I was working from an old one.  That road is on the new MVUM.
tkansgar (2023-10-24 18:55:01+00:00): Hi @BrchPlt, du hast am 21.02.2023 den Weg 1148357917 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1148357917/history#map=17/52.24936/9.32320&layers=C) südöstlich von Gut Nienfeld hinzugefügt. Ich habe ihn von Südwesten kommend nicht gefunden. Ich hätte ja versucht mich da durch das viele Gestrüpp zu kämpfen. Aber dafür hätte ich ein Buschmesser gebraucht. Bist du sicher, dass der Weg wirklich existiert? Grüße, tkansgar
wireguy (2023-04-03 14:30:12+00:00): the relation 15518666 is not closed.   is it just a repeat of way 993381372?  The relation has the name info, while the way does not.  They have different layer tags 1v2.
NorthCrab (2023-02-22 04:14:50+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/367130313
Czy to aby na pewno jest parking?
olo81 (2023-02-24 23:52:02+00:00): To nie są parkingi, jak wszystkie miejsca parkingowe w okolicy są zajęte, to tam też ktoś wiedzie.
Emilius123 (2023-02-21 23:54:50+00:00): Please excuse me, this was meant to  be publishe on EmiliusAuto.
Emilius123 (2023-02-21 23:54:47+00:00): Please excuse me, this was meant to  be publishe on EmiliusAuto.
Frans S (2023-02-22 16:07:29+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this task.
Please do not cluster buildings. 
each building need to be mapped separately.
Best regards and keep mapping
Glassman (2023-02-23 17:48:05+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132857962
Glassman (2023-02-23 17:48:26+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132857976
WC392309 (2023-02-22 00:35:25+00:00): This can be reverted if inaccurate, however, there were some needed changes
Glassman (2023-02-23 17:49:58+00:00): Looks like you forgot to add the building=* tag. Can you add the tag to it?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132858051
Glassman (2023-02-23 17:52:16+00:00): The slipway should be connected to a service road and I usually connect the slipway to the water's edge. Can you review this edit?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132858123
Frans S (2023-02-28 17:55:58+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, during the validation process
I noticed that you are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.
We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. Just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.
Please map each building accurate over the rooflines.
Each rectangular building need to be squared. !!  tab on the Q key when still selected
Nodes of buildings may not connect to other buildings or features.
The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 
Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132858156
Glassman (2023-02-23 17:52:33+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132858225
Glassman (2023-02-23 17:52:47+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132858242
emersonveenstra (2023-02-22 15:21:21+00:00): Hi,

On https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1012942514, you changed the value of lanes from 4 to 3 but didn't update the turn:lanes or destination:ref:lanes values. Could you please do that? Thanks!
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-22 01:18:28+00:00): Please use better changeset comments.  What did you change and why?

Refer here for more info:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset_comment
ALu68 (2023-02-25 12:51:03+00:00): The same: 元高取出張所 is not a name
Frans S (2023-03-01 13:08:24+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
Don't cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped separately.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132858459
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-22 01:18:43+00:00): Please use better changeset comments.  What did you change and why?

Refer here for more info:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset_comment
jeslop (2023-02-22 12:29:34+00:00): Hola carlos198769.
¿Hay algún motivo para estos borrados masivos que estás haciendo?. 
No das ninguna información (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Good_changeset_comments) sobre los cambios que estás realizando.

Saludos

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
duncaninnes (2023-02-22 01:44:53+00:00): Toll station has been removed from the road
ivanbranco (2024-04-26 16:54:07+00:00): Hi rimugu,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10684560095/history

was this supposed to be place=hamlet? Do you know if this place have a name?

Thanks
jeslop (2023-02-22 12:32:57+00:00): Hola AmstelCee. ¿Hay alguna razón para borrar todos estos nodos? 
Recuerda también: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenos_comentarios_en_conjuntos_de_cambios

Saludos

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
jeslop (2023-02-23 13:57:53+00:00): Revierto este conjunto ante la ausencia de explicación por el borrado masivo.

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-11-08 08:52:55+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1148372957

surface=앿?

Can it be safely retagged to surface=dirt? Or maybe surface=unpaved? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:surface

(https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1D6E finds more surface=앿 on ways that you modified, is it safe to replace all of them by surface=dirt ?)
Frans S (2023-03-02 16:45:03+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, during the validation process
I noticed that you are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.
We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. Just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.
Please map each building accurate over the rooflines.
Square each rectangular building with the Q key.
Nodes of buildings may NOT  connect to other buildings or features.
The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 
Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132859215
Frans S (2023-03-02 16:47:31+00:00): Another point. You removed the standard hashtags from your changeset upload.  Don't alter those. They are used for statistic and management reasons. 
You can add your comments behind the  string.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132859215
staka_sghm (2023-02-27 12:59:03+00:00): Es gibt keinen Grund die Hildener Straße mit zwei Linien darzustellen. Dazu müssen die Fahrbahnen baulich getrennt sein - sind sie nicht. Das gilt auch für einige andere Änderungen.
Und der Hinweis "Minor fixes und Fußwege nachträglich eintragen" ist ja wohl komplett falsch.
Bitte mal die Digitalisierungsvorschriften lesen und die Änderungshinweise ordentlich ausfüllen.
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-22 06:41:19+00:00): Do not remove features that actually exist.
Glassman (2023-02-23 17:53:07+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132859570
Andrea Musuruane (2023-02-23 14:28:07+00:00): Ciao. I nomi dei percorsi mtb non devono essere inseriti nel tag name ma nel tag mtb:name (e in questo caso c'erano gia') oppure nel tag name delle relazioni di route MTB: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mountain_biking Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132859581
Glassman (2023-02-23 17:53:21+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132859584
Glassman (2023-02-23 17:53:33+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132859597
Frans S (2023-03-29 11:29:58+00:00): 
Hello. Thanks for mapping on this difficult task.
About mapping of multy- story apartment blocks or high buildings

Mapping of tall (multi-story) buildings differs from standard buildings. Because the imagery is taken at an angle, you will see both the rooflines and also the side of a building. 
How do you map such a building?
Map over the rooflines and lastly slide the mapped building to the footprint.
Please adjust wrong positioned buildings as well
This video shows how that is done.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1V5-bADsYiffCD9bo6l64YOdTvmKqMGry/view?usp=share_link

And.... don't forget to square each rectangular building.

Best regards and keep mapping
EvanSiroky (2023-03-01 05:38:42+00:00): Hey there! I'm a local mapper from Scotts Valley, California. I see that you requested a review of this changeset, so I'm giving it a review.

In general, some roads may not need to be explicitly marked as being bikeable. I'd recommend reading the OSM wiki page about "OSM tags for routing/Access restrictions" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions.

In general, certain road classifications have certain default access restrictions that are generally believed to be what routers should interpret. Of the roads that you marked, it appears that it merely confirms what the default expectations are in the US.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:10:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:10:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:11:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
Warin61 (2023-03-03 00:06:02+00:00): Same error in relation 15518947 as in your past changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131835596

You should fix these so as you don't continue to repeat the error.
Warin61 (2023-04-10 01:04:45+00:00): Relation  	15518947 deleted...
Not so certain that this is water .. look at the mapbox imagery.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:11:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:11:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:11:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:12:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:11:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:11:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:11:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
MxxCon (2023-02-22 05:26:08+00:00): Hello.
When editing in OSM please submit our edits grouped into smaller geographic regions, such as neighborhoods, cities or at most states.
Doing so not only makes it easier to review your edits, spotting any potential problems, but also help you preserve your work if something happens to your browser and it crashes.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132861087
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:11:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
mavl (2023-02-22 06:11:07+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 132743349, 132744107, 132744736, 132745054, 132745629, 132745862, 132788587, 132789113, 132790856, 132790935.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:10:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:11:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:10:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
RedEyedVireo (2023-02-22 19:47:56+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM,

It looks like something went wrong with your edit and there is now a shop in the middle of a major road. 

From the address you specified I am guessing that Down Range Sports is located in this building: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/211965825
If so would it be possible for you to move the node to the correct location?

Also it does not seem like you specified what kind of shop Down Range Sports is. From the website it looks like shop=weapons would be appropriate. 

If you have any questions feel free to ask.

RedEyedVireo
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:10:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:11:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
JJIglesias (2023-02-22 15:15:54+00:00): Saludos. Tomar en cuenta que Motel en Castellano e Ingles NO significan lo mismo. Un motel para nosotros es (amenity=love_hotel) y para ellos es (tourism=motel)
Saludos
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-02-26 15:17:54+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1148406140
Uterouter (2023-02-24 14:44:37+00:00): Привет. Поясните вашу правку пожалуйста. Там стоит 5 домов, и проезды совсем иначе расположены. Вы сами придумываете их? Ваш проезд прямо по домам проходит. Может тогда стоит рисовать дороги по снимкам Ersi а не старым Bing. Справа можно выбрать фоновые изображения "Снимки Ersi". И проезды к домам изображаются "Служебной дорогой".
Frans S (2023-02-28 17:34:26+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
Use the correct imagery. Maxar is the standard on this project. 



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132863720
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:10:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:11:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:10:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:12:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
Frans S (2023-04-07 13:14:31+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
You added on many buildings the tag layer=1
Why?  They are building on the ground !
Layers are to be used where a road crosses a water (bridge) or tunnel.
Please keep that in mind
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132863869
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:11:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
eggie (2023-02-22 07:22:24+00:00): Thanks..
Groet
eggie
user_5359 (2023-02-22 07:19:57+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please use the correct keys Use addr:full instead of address (or better use the detail keys like addr:state, addr:postcode, addr:city, addr:street, addr:housenumber.

Please add the Typ of business also
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-22 06:38:49+00:00): These edits were added by user:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/combdaddy

User has been referred to DWG.
marczoutendijk (2023-02-22 08:07:12+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6889
julcnx (2023-02-22 06:55:18+00:00): thank you for your contributions :) a little tip, add a better description to your changeset comment so other mappers can understand your changes: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

ขอบคุณสำหรับการมีส่วนร่วมของคุณ :) เคล็ดลับเล็กน้อย เพิ่มคำอธิบายที่ดีขึ้นในความคิดเห็นชุดการเปลี่ยนแปลงของคุณ เพื่อให้ผู้ทำแผนที่คนอื่นๆ สามารถเข้าใจการเปลี่ยนแปลงของคุณได้: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132864176