piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Dindia (2026-01-20 14:27:34+00:00): FYI: The paths were incorrectly set as FOOT PATH. This is incorrect according to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dfootway.

Footways tend to be constructed and either paved or with smooth surface (compacted, wood or similar). The elderly and small children and wheelchair users can use them with ease. They tend to be in urban settings. access=* is normally designated for pedestrians, which is often specified by street signs (or implied by local law).

Paths kept mainly by people repeatedly walking on them, or those that are only minimally constructed, are usually tagged as highway=path. Their surface might be uneven (typically ground) and one might need to be physically fit and situationally aware to use them. They tend to be located outside of urban enviromnent. Hiking trails are a typical example.

I fixed it by setting to PATH
Xvtn (2024-03-07 15:27:36+00:00): Hi! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes here. No problems I can see! I think footpath is great here, but in the future one thing to keep in mind is that you can also add access tags to show who can travel without actually reclassifying the way, if that makes sense. So in the hypothetical scenario where there really was a roadway, but only foot traffic was allowed, you could put 
motor_vehicle=no
foot=yes (or foot=designated).

Again though, from what I can tell, in this case footpath works great here. Let me know if you have any questions, and thanks for your contributions!
Jrachi (2024-03-07 15:52:32+00:00): Si, vero!
la sac_scale di dovrebbe mettere solo su sentieri...
Colpa mia, di una cattiva interpretazione oltre all'uso di assegnare il valore su tutti i membri di una relazione hiking in modo massivo.
Ho smesso di farlo e ora lo correggo a mano a mano che riprendo in mano le relazioni.
Ma, perché hai tolto quel tratto di strada dal percorso ETOC0530000?
Forse conosci qualche modifica al catasto regionale che io non conosco?
RedAuburn (2024-06-15 21:30:16+00:00): a note was created saying that this bowling green pavilion doesn't exist https://www.osm.org/note/4292073

are you sure this exists?
mrpacmanmap (2024-06-30 16:18:29+00:00): The bowling green pavilion is proposed/under construction as part of the BCLM's forging ahead programme. The location of the pavilion can be found here: http://planningdocuments.dudley.gov.uk/AnitePublicDocs/00491562.pdf
Ferrocarriles de México (2024-03-10 05:24:53+00:00): It was not opened, it was a “pre-opening”, i.e.: a purely political event. It is still in construction. Therefore, I am reverting this for now. I am keeping a watch on this project and will update when it actually opens.
NeisBot (2024-03-19 15:45:48+00:00): Hello Pankaj Kumar meena, thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.Please see https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments \n
Thanks!

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-08 09:47:49+00:00): Hello!

Note that you do not need to add description of feature type as a name.
For example when mapping tree it is enough to specify that it is a tree, no need for putting that name of this specific tree is "Tree".

So for buildings it is not needed to put Building as their name.

Or do you maybe know that this specific object mapped at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1258382353 is specifically named with such name?

And if it was mistake - can you edit map to remove this name?
    
Do not worry too much about this issue - I made way worse mistakes when I was starting. Maybe some tool or explanation is confusing? Why you added this name? Note that I am asking as maybe something can be fixed to be less confusing.
eggie (2024-03-06 20:54:04+00:00): Dag Gret

Hier je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=148310589

Je had het grasveld vastgeplaakt aan een ondergrondse hoogspanningslijn.
Ik heb het losgemaakt.

Den k niet dat dogs=yes een valide tag is.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:dog
Ik heb er dog=  van gemaakt.
Bij beschrijvingen beter description gebruiken.
name		Afvalbrengstation Uitenhagestraat ipv name... of het moet echt de naam van zijn?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-03-06 21:07:57+00:00): Tip  ..Plakken kun je met editor iD voorkomen door de linker alttoets te gebruiken tijdens intekenen.
Baloo Uriza (2024-03-11 01:13:02+00:00): Try out the "orthagonalize" tool to get those right-angles snapped nicely.  It's the "Q" key in the default id editor.
Baloo Uriza (2024-03-11 01:13:47+00:00): Try out the "orthagonalize" tool to get those right-angles snapped nicely.  It's the "Q" key in the default id editor.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148310674
Tengku Almira (2024-03-11 03:14:29+00:00): Yes by pressing "Q" on the keyboard is the easiest way to change the digitized shape to Orthogonalize Shape
NeisBot (2024-03-24 12:40:42+00:00): Hello Harsh1718kumar, thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.Please see https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments \n
Thanks!

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-23 09:41:29+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11698566021/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
flatroy (2025-04-23 12:04:03+00:00): hi! there were knafeh place but not I do not know if it exists now..  I deleted node
NeisBot (2024-03-24 12:40:42+00:00): Hello sarthakchauhaniitbhu, thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.Please see https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments \n
Thanks!

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
Túllio (2024-03-15 23:25:50+00:00): Primeiramente muito obrigado pelas edições! Aproveitar para lembrar que as casas/edifícios não devem ser marcadas como "landuse=residential" e sim como "building=yes" ou similares! Obrigado e bom mapeamento.
3ngineer (2025-10-23 06:14:02+00:00): Hi again nyanpsyche, if you could please let me know what your source is for the detailed placement of these underground cables, I'd like to verify. Thank you! According to BC Hydro, they most likely run East-West along West 7th Ave.
nyanpsyche (2025-10-23 20:33:51+00:00): Hello again!

The source for these lines is a BC Hydro schematic in response to a BC One Call request. You area correct, there is one conduit which runs along 7th avenue and then turns north along Alberta street at a utility vault. I'm not sure why I didn't add it at the time, but I believe it was because I was focused on the conduits directly connected to the substation.
bagis (2024-09-17 03:51:31+00:00): Hello!
The history is a bit unclear but I do not think this is the correct solution. For some reason this snowmobile path is tagged as an unclassified highway which seems wrong. The first example on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Path_examples shows that path with snowmobile designated I have also seen many that are only tagged with snowmobile such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1160893397 which is fine as they show up on the snowmobile map.
What do you think about it?
Best regards,
bagis
Anders Ström (2024-09-18 08:17:58+00:00): The snowmobile=* tag is an access tag, and should be probably be used with a highway=* tag to cleraify what kind of road it is.
The path_example is just an example. There is no indication on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:snowmobile thta it should only be used with paths.
The history is that I did not setup the orignal track as unclassified. The thing I did was to handle the intersection with the E4 highway.
bagis (2024-09-18 17:27:14+00:00): I guessed that you did not create the unclassified road.
It still feels wrong as there is no road there, I will leave it for now.
Mazda05 (2025-05-25 22:47:28+00:00): Jay May, Hello. Again I ask you not to change the highway=* tag https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway on the roads at the state border crossing points between Ukraine, Belarus, Russia, Moldova, as well as on the road sections between the border crossing points. These roads are marked according to the local agreements on marking the status of roads in each state. There is no reason to downgrade the roads to highway=service https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dservice status.


Prohibition of passage on these roads is indicated with the access=no tag https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Dno. Destroyed road sections and destroyed bridges are marked with destroyed:highway=* https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:destroyed:*, damaged road sections are marked with abandoned:highway=* https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:abandoned:highway and was:highway=* https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:was:*.
user1572739 (2024-03-08 13:39:28+00:00): Hallo! Bitte nicht einfach eine zweite Linie parallel über einen Teil einer anderen drüber mappen, wenn die Eigenschaften der ersten an der betreffenden Stelle nicht passen. Stattdessen muss man die Linie ggf. auftrennen und die Eigenschaften ändern. So waren da jetzt gleichzeitig ein geplantes und ein in Bau befindliches Gleis genau übereinander, was natürlich nicht stimmen kann. Ich habe das gerade repariert.
stellarrrr (2025-08-11 17:16:17+00:00): hi, did you forget to add tags to way #1258399290?
gscscnd (2025-08-11 19:27:51+00:00): Good catch, thanks!
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170309991
woodpeck (2024-03-06 20:45:41+00:00): Dear harshjoshi-iitbhu, when you upload data to OSM you are prompted for a "changeset comment". This is for your fellow mappers to understand what you are doing. Putting a single dot in that field is not a sufficient changeset comment; we'd expect you to explain what you edited and why. For example, in this particular case, "aligned POI with road grid" or something like that.
arkarjun (2024-03-10 16:12:30+00:00): Hi harshjoshi-iitbhu,
This may be helpful to you in writing a good changeset comment and understanding it better. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
perusluku (2024-03-06 20:09:31+00:00): to defensive_works*
Túllio (2024-03-16 01:30:47+00:00): Muito obrigado pelo sua edição! Aproveito para lembrar de evitar que edifícios cruzem ou venham a ficar sobre outros edifícios. Muito obrigado!
Tomas Straupis (2024-03-07 08:38:51+00:00): Hello, please do not change road classification (at least in Lithuanian side). It is tagged according to official classification. The fact that it is closed does NOT change the classification.
Jay May (2024-03-07 09:22:50+00:00): Classification doesn't mean anything here. Theory is one thing, practice is another one.Currently, those roads do not have any function, so tagging them as "primary" or "trunk" makes no sense. Such approach "strictly according to the theorical classification" leads to absurd road tagging, like the Joniškis bypass being classified lower than the "A" road leading through the city center.
In Vilnius, we have several (good) examples of "A" and regional roads classified lower: A3/A15/101 around the Vilnius Old Town, for instance (classified as "secondary). A3/A15 close to the train station (classified as "primary"). Same thing goes for Kaunas, etc. Why not extending such good road tagging practices to the whole country?
Tomas Straupis (2024-03-07 10:17:02+00:00): We have to maintain homogeneity of the whole Lithuania, not some specific small parts of it. Therefore we attach classification to official/government classification. This has been discussed and agreed long time ago by Lithuanian mapping community - otherwise classification is subjective: people constantly change it according to their own understanding, different uses tend to "want" different classifications which lead to pointless disputes etc. Current classification also adheres to the rules of cartography where temporary permissions have no influence. If it is not possible to pass - you add "access=no" (or similar). If you want THAT to be very visible on a map, you would then... well have to create your own symbolisation of that information.
SomeoneElse (2024-03-06 20:43:08+00:00): These really are signed on the ground as "Burton Green (East)" despite being west of the "Burton Green West" stops.
The websites show buses going west reach this stop a minute after the one labelled "West" to the East.
urbalazs (2024-03-27 21:09:54+00:00): Szia Antissimo! Ránéznél erre a szakaszra, mert valami félrement: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1258408365
Antissimo (2024-03-27 21:20:59+00:00): Jogos, javítva!
SomeoneElse (2024-03-06 20:41:56+00:00): These really are signed on the ground as "Burton Green West" despite being east of the "Burton Green (East)" stops.
The websites show buses going west reach this stop a minute before one labelled "East" to the West.
eggie (2024-03-07 08:33:53+00:00): Dag Erwin  Wegen op prive terrein kun je gewoon in OSM laten.. dus niet verwijderen.
Wel natuurlijk de juiste accesstags toevoegen en een extra tag service=driveway Bv access=private
Het hek kun je toevoegen op een node met barrier=gate access=.... 
MVG
eggie
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2024-03-10 11:33:19+00:00): It's usually better to tag forest paths as highway=path ("Path" in iD editor template selection) unless there is an explicit ban on bicycles there.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2024-03-10 11:34:20+00:00): You've also named one section
just "Tammermaa". I assume it's by mistake.
eggie (2024-03-06 21:00:40+00:00): Beste Erwin  De  molen was hier toch al gemapt op de kaart. Wat is het probleem?
Of je kiest voor de adresnode of je gebruikt het gebouw

'k Denk beter je toevoeging verwijderen en evt aanvullingen toevoegen aan het gebouw.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-03-06 21:05:58+00:00): Of alle info naar de node en de gebouwomtrek ontdoen van de moleninfo
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Tag:man_made%3Dwindmill
eggie (2024-03-06 21:14:22+00:00): Dubbele tagging heb ik verwijderd.
Info samengevoegd.
Groet,
eggie
NeisBot (2024-03-24 12:40:43+00:00): Hello Riteshkumar@civiitbhu, thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.Please see https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments \n
Thanks!

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
maro21 (2024-03-09 02:52:19+00:00): Na jakiej podstawie decydujesz o położeniu osiedla? Dlaczego usunąłeś name:genitive?
pavvv (2024-03-09 19:28:01+00:00): staram się umieścić je mniej więcej w środku osiedla, ale też bliżej większych skupisk bloków
tag name:genitive jest w ogólnie niepotrzebny i nie rozumiem dlaczego istnieje, ale pomijając to, Vespucci proponuje dodać ten tag do węzłów z place=neighbourhood a do quarter i suburb już nie, więc pomyślałem, że już jest zbędny
maraf24 (2024-03-24 22:32:35+00:00): >tag name:genitive jest w ogólnie niepotrzebny

Jest to nieprawda. Nazwa ta jest uwzględniana przez Nominatim.

Radzę na serio zacząć dyskutować zmiany z innymi mapowiczami przed ich dokonaniem, bo dużo rzeczy nie wiesz.
pavvv (2024-03-24 22:37:22+00:00): kto będzie wyszukiwał po nazwie w dopełniaczu? może od razu dodać wszystkie inne przypadki?
pavvv (2024-03-24 22:37:58+00:00): w niektórych miejscach nazwa była też błędna
maraf24 (2024-03-25 11:09:25+00:00): >może od razu dodać wszystkie inne przypadki?

name:dative jest szczególnie przydatny przy wyszukiwaniu, sam dodawałem ten tag kilka razy, bo inaczej wyszukiwarka sobie nie radziła
maro21 (2024-03-30 00:11:51+00:00): https://osm.wiki/Good_practice#Don't_remove_tags_that_you_don't_understand
https://sproutsschools.com/chesterton-fence-dont-destroy-what-you-dont-understand/
To, że czegoś nie potrzebujesz, nie znaczy, że inni nie potrzebują, więc nie jest to wystarczający powód do usunięcia.
maraf24 (2024-04-16 20:35:21+00:00): Węzeł Karłowice poprzednio był w okolicy pętli  autobusowej i uniwersytetu. To chyba sensowniejsze umiejscowienie.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1233394915
pavvv (2024-04-17 04:40:11+00:00): Tu już nie ma pętli autobusowej 😉. Okolice Uniwersytetu i wieży ciśnień są raczej skrajem Karłowic. Jeśli już to bardziej pasowałaby okolica kościoła i Polany Karłowickiej.
dvdhoven (2024-03-07 06:52:29+00:00): Op het eerste stukje Nachtegaallaan was in rcn route 04-05 nog de rol forward blijven staat, terwijl dit stukje nu ook tweerichting gebruikt wordt door de route. Deze forward verwijderd en route 04-05 is nu in orde.

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
eggie (2024-03-07 08:21:00+00:00): In de Trekvaartroute zat een identiek foutje. Ik heb het hersteld.
MVG
eggie
ErikSH (2024-03-07 19:25:24+00:00): Hartelijk bedankt voor jullie (Dick en Eggie) constructieve en bemoedigende reacties en voor het fixen van mijn kleine(!) fouten. Bedankt.

Ik moet wel zeggen dat het mij niet helemaal helder is of er in JOSM een snelle/makkelijke manier bestaat om dergelijke fouten of vergissingen te kunnen opsporen en verhelpen vlak vóór de wijzigingen up te loaden?
Misschien via het relatie bewerkingspaneel? Er mag daarin - geloof ik - geen RODE puntjes in de smalle rechter column in de lijst met 'Leden'?

Of hebben jullie andere en betere tips?

Vriendelijke groeten,
Erik Hansen
eggie (2024-03-07 19:31:53+00:00): Hoi... nou zo doe ik het ook. In het relatievenster zie ik dan een onvolkomenheid. De delen sluiten dan niet goed aan.
Ik check dan eerst alle routes en check dan het relatievenster.
Verder hebben we dan de doorlopende analyse van knooppuntnet
Verder wordt er doorlopend  gemonitord met knooppunt
ErikSH (2024-03-07 19:37:46+00:00): Bedankt Eggie!
Die onvolkomenheid heb ik kennelijk over het hoofd gezien in het relatievenster, volgende keer beter - hopelijk...
Ik had gehoopt dat er misschien voor JOSM een of andere plugin zou bestaan die dat soort fouten kon valideren vóór of tijdens de upload procedure?
eggie (2024-03-07 19:43:55+00:00): Je kunt het ook zien  in de fietskaart layer voor de fietsroutes. Maar die update duurt altijd een kleine week.
.. en meestal kijk je niet een week terug met wat je hebt gedaan.
habi (2024-04-02 12:50:19+00:00): I reverted this changeset, because it adde one of the ten largest buildings in OpenStreetMap. The server room you've added here will be resurrected.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149479692
habi (2024-04-02 12:53:06+00:00): The server room has been undelete in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149479851
BR_pebble (2024-07-18 12:21:16+00:00): Hello Kingsley AMANKWE
Thank you for mapping!
I have added missing highway at 8.4546648, 8.6649996.
Please inspect your task carefully before closing.
Happy Mapping!
matix849 (2024-03-10 14:25:28+00:00): Reverted: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148464449
gscholz (2024-03-10 08:23:56+00:00): Hi zlyntud,
your recent edit have created a lot of errors regarding not valid "natural" and "landuse" relations:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=111.78636&lat=-6.78674&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=148316377

Can you please fix this?

You may like to educate yourself about how to edit multipolygones properly, as you seem not to unterstand the meanings of the "outer" and "inner" roles:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multipolygon_Examples

Kind regards
Guido
Xvtn (2024-03-07 15:23:16+00:00): Hi! Looking at your name change here, it seems like you're wanting a description of your business "martial arts school" to be in the name field. In OpenStreetMap, we use other tags to describe attributes of a feature. The name= tag is only for the actual official or "common" name for the feature.
bradrh (2024-03-06 21:37:55+00:00): Comment: Roads SW of Montrose.  Source: BLM, county, and Esri.
patadune (2025-07-21 11:55:38+00:00): J'ai repassé la voie de bus en highway=busway (cf. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169239328), pour rester cohérent avec d'autres changements sur Antibes, et suivre les guidelines du wiki. Le rendu par défaut OSM-Carto ne les affiche toujours pas, pour des raisons obscures (cf. https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/4226), mais il me semble important de ne pas cartographier spécifiquement pour ce rendu
Lyon-St-Clair (2025-07-21 14:30:28+00:00): au contraire c'est quand même le rendu le plus utilisé qui pose souci...
patadune (2025-07-21 14:39:34+00:00): Oui, mais la solution me semble de pousser pour la prise en compte de highway=busway dans ce rendu, plutôt que de mapper pour le rendu en utilisant des tags dépréciés par le wiki ?
flohoff (2024-03-06 23:42:34+00:00): Moin,
du hast hier diverse landuse=meadow eingetragen.

Welche tiere weiden denn da ? Weil meadow sind aktive Weiden. 

Dazu kommt das du vergessen hast hier multipolygone zu erzeugen. Aktuell liegen hier die landuses einfach übereinander.

Hier sieht man die overlaps 

https://osm.zz.de/dbview/?db=landuseoverlap-owl&layer=overlap#51.99147,8.63744,17z

Da das nicht alle paar stunden berechnet sieht man da aktuell nur die alten.

Flo
Maracuja (2024-03-07 12:15:51+00:00): Moin,
danke für den Hinweis. Es handelt sich bei den Flächen um Rigolen. Ich habe mir nochmal die Dokumentation angeschaut und die sollten dann wohl mit 
    natural=water + water=basin + basin=infiltration
getaggt werden?
Dadurch gäbe es auch keine Konflikte mehr mit der Landuse oder?

LG Tim
flohoff (2024-03-07 13:58:41+00:00): Korrekt - Wenn das versickerungsflächen sind (Selbst wenn die zu 90% der zeit nur Grass zeigen) ist das ein natural=water+water=basin+basin=infiltration - und dann kann man noch ein intermittend=yes dazu packen.

landuse ist eigentlich kein tag für "micromapping" - Also wenn man die versuchung hat etwas was <1000m² hat als landuse einzutragen ist das eher falsch.

Der drang landuse und nicht landcover zu nehmen ist das landuse im gegensatz zu landcoder nicht gerendert wird. 

Es gibt leider so auch so unfälle wie "landuse=flowerbed" und so - eigentlich totaler mumpitz.

Flo
VictorIE (2024-08-25 09:38:48+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/120312268/history

Did you mean to remove the highway=service tag?
mcliquid (2024-03-07 13:29:14+00:00): Hi,

please note: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
cquest (2024-03-16 19:26:29+00:00): My bad... I usually avoid this kind of large changeset.