piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
CjMalone (2024-03-15 17:07:28+00:00): Looks good to me, thank you
phodgkin (2024-10-02 21:05:36+00:00): I think Harry's House is best tagged as tourism=chalet (as I originally had it), since it is self-catering. A tourism=guest_house would have an FHRS ID.
kapazao (2024-03-20 08:20:52+00:00): Hola, esa forma de añadir edificios no es correcta, deberías de revisar la wiki de OSM y ver por ejemplo la parte de importación de edificios de Catastro.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Catastro_espa%C3%B1ol/Digitalizaci%C3%B3n_de_edificios
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenas_pr%C3%A1cticas
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenas_pr%C3%A1cticas_en_Espa%C3%B1a

Al comparar con la capa de Catastro y la realidad se puede considerar que estás añadiendo edificios ficticios y esto crea problemas, por lo que pueden ser eliminados, así que sería mejor que no continuases haciéndolo así.

Un saludo y gracias por tus contribuciones.
MxxCon (2024-03-20 02:22:20+00:00): The correct tag here should be start_date=.
opening_date= is intended for things that are not open yet.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_date
vs
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:start_date
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148663131
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-20 06:20:45+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/271168820/history has amenity = storage_rental that was added in this edit
amenity=storage_rental ? Is it simply a shop=storage_rental? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=storage_rental Or is it selling boxes/packaging?

If it is certainly shop=storage_rental - would it be safe to mass-retag it without inspecting individual cases for all objects tagged this way?
shinterro (2025-12-21 03:19:39+00:00): Hi! And thanks.
shop=storage_rental is fine as that better aligns with current use.

A mass edit would be safe, but there may be no need - I can see on Overpass I've used this tag about a dozen times and see other small fixes I'd like to make at each location. I'm reviewing now for cleanup.

SOAPBOX
shop=storage_rental is weird though. I keep accidentally using amenity because it makes more taxonomic sense in my brain. Even when you poll https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=shop%3D*_rental vs https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=amenity%3D*_rental, it is an outlier.

This specific location rents storage, trailers, and trucks, and also sells moving supplies. I'd love to have an agreed tag block that covers these appropriately.

/SOAPBOX
shinterro (2025-12-21 04:39:58+00:00): Think this sorts them all out: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176203918
Marek-M (2024-03-14 22:03:00+00:00): Źródło AED: artykuł https://mckis.jaworzno.pl/ratuja-zycie/
DD1GJ (2024-03-15 07:19:39+00:00): Hallo, willkommen bei OSM. Google Maps ist als Quelle für OSM nicht erlaubt. Daher habe ich Deine Änderung gelöscht.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf
gurglypipe (2024-03-15 11:45:03+00:00): For anyone else looking at this in future, see discussion on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148228217
kapazao (2025-12-06 17:14:20+00:00): Hi, could you give some references about this (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1262727168) power plant?
I have searched on Internet and official documents and I cannot find any information.
Regards
riiga (2024-03-15 07:00:58+00:00): Hej! Varför har du raderat plattformar för busshållplatser som redan fanns rätt inritade när du i övrigt har gjort kartan bättre?
Snusmumriken (2024-03-15 13:05:20+00:00): Det var ett misstag. Hade för avsikt att göra om areor till linjer. Toppen att du uppmärksammade detta. Ska rätta till det
mapperue (2024-04-08 16:20:37+00:00): Proč je tato cesta jednosměrná?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1262732013
Dan 9 (2024-03-27 15:46:19+00:00): Supermarketul Kaufland Militari Residence era deja adăugat pe hartă. Actualizările pe aplicații apar mai târziu, deoarece se fac periodic.
vasony (2024-03-16 18:22:54+00:00): Szia!

Az Esrin itt van ház, de törölted a 28-at:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9732045959

Tamás
efi99 (2024-03-16 18:30:45+00:00): Jogos, javítva.
Xvtn (2024-03-17 20:48:07+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes here. Looks good overall! I do see a couple of problems. For tags like material and colour, the values have to follow specific established conventions. If you aren't sure what's allowed, you can click the "i" icon next to the tag field, and link to the wiki. When trying to list multiple values, you have to separate them with a semicolon, e.g. wood;plastic. However, it's generally considered best to avoid multiple listed values whenever possible. So in this case I'd recommend choosing the more "primary" material of a bench (what material would someone be sitting on?) and use that value only.

Other than that, everything else looks good to me! Let me know if you have any questions, and thanks for your contributions!
Xvtn (2024-03-17 20:42:29+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Since you requested a review, I looked over this changeset. Looks like you didn't really change anything, so no problems I guess! Haha.
Jakka (2024-03-15 07:36:30+00:00): Eerst eens de wiki handleidingen raadplegen voor men highway aanpast naar ander type dit is zeker geen autostrade ;)
mangerlahn (2024-03-27 20:34:33+00:00): Du hast (wieder) auf der Volksgartenstraße use_sidepath für foot und bicycle gesetzt, obwohl auf der Straße sidewalk:right=yes und cycleway:right=lane gesetzt ist. Diese Tags stehen im Widerspruch zu use_sidepath. Ich habe das schon vor 6 Monaten aufgeräumt, denn das sorgt für Probleme beim Routen von zu Fuß Gehenden und Radfahrenden. Wenn du das Tag wirklich unbedingt setzen willst, dann prüfe bitte vorher, ob nicht doch auf der Straße ein Rad- oder Fußweg verzeichnet ist.
mangerlahn (2024-03-27 20:40:08+00:00): Zumal das Ganze hier auch inhaltlich falsch ist. In nördlicher Richtung ist Radfahren auf der Fahrbahn geboten. Teilweise sind Radstreifen vorhanden, teilweise nicht. Der begleitende Fuß- und Radweg in südlicher Richtung ist nicht in beide Richtungen freigegeben.
Bastianowitz (2024-03-28 17:10:18+00:00): Auweia, ich verabscheue mich selber! Das komm davon wenn Schüler sich ihren Stoff selber ausarbeiten müssen.
Mir wurde hier nur dringendst mitgeteilt bei "Sidewalk separate" das foot = use_sidepath nicht zu vergessen, weil es immer vergessen wird.
Ich wusste aber nicht, dass dies dann auf zwei Straßenseiten dann treffend ist.
Aber dann ist ja die eine separate "Sidewalk separate" nicht wirklich benutzt 🤔 verstehe wer kann hmm
Also bearbeite ich nur noch Straßen mit beidseitigen separaten Sidewalks bzw. einer Seite ohne jeglichen Sidewalk. Bei Bicycle ist das anders, da habe ich wirklich schon aktuelle Seiten gesehen. Denn nur so kann separat eingezeichnet ja auch wirksam genutzt werden. Warum kommt es denn da nicht zu Störungen, wenn plötzlich eine Seite weg ist.
Okay, jedenfalls werde ich es da nun jetzt noch mehr machen, ich schwöre.
Bastianowitz (2024-03-28 17:14:29+00:00): nicht
und aus line habe ich nicht das ich wüsste absichtlich einen separaten Sidewalk oder cycleway gemacht.
Klar macht das keinen Sinn
Yonseca (2024-03-15 00:34:46+00:00): Sobre este cambio, que no se ha subido el resumen: añado carril bici en rotonda de Gran Vía de Villaverde
DaveF (2024-07-25 12:40:54+00:00): Hi
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4459571349
Do you know if this area is still being used as a restaurant/cafe?
pennm (2024-07-25 17:36:26+00:00): Yes - this area is now used exclusively as a social/study space and does not appear to have catering facilities. It shouls probably be removed, but I didn't know SC would tag as disused:shop :)
DaveF (2024-07-25 21:09:39+00:00): Ta
Deleted.
silversurfer83 (2024-03-15 02:21:01+00:00): Gude :)

die EIgenschaften des "Walls" haben mich neugierig gemacht. Darf ich fragen, was genau um den Teich herum ist?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1262762765

cheers
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148667557
Mashin (2024-03-15 14:22:31+00:00): Hi and thanks for the correction.
One thing that you could do next time is to re-label the driveway part of residential road as Driveway (highway=service + service=driveway) instead of deleting it. That way we don't lose information.
Cheers
gscholz (2024-03-16 06:14:34+00:00): Hi Trip Maker,
this changeset has created several errors regarding self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=103.68134&lat=1.45886&zoom=10&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=148668295

Especially way 882695987 was affected here.

I have just fixed it.
Kind regards
Guido
emersonveenstra (2024-03-16 14:04:08+00:00): Hi there,

When you create roads like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1262774121, please always make sure to connect them to the other roads, otherwise no routers can use them. The editor warned you of this when you went to save, it's usually a good idea to look at those warnings. 

Could you please fix this? Thanks!
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-03-19 07:13:27+00:00): Please don't add fake data. This can be considered vandalism.
JimenezEd (2024-03-15 08:58:10+00:00): Esta es la ubicación actualizada de la clínica.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-14 18:49:06+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11733160018/history has shop = organic that was added in this edit
shop=organic ? What kind of products are sold there?

shop tag should contain shop type value - and organic is not one

You can have organic shop of various types

shop=greengrocer
shop=cosmetics
shop=grocery
shop=convenience
etc

are all possible. What kind of shop is this one?

organic status can be tagged with organic=yes/organic=only - see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:organic
Igor Bubelov (2024-03-15 05:30:08+00:00): Hi! Are you the owner?
rothg (2024-03-19 18:19:21+00:00): Hi Alex,

I mostly agree with you here, though there is what I'd call a short, 1-block cycle track on the east side of 102nd between Holladay and Pacific to enable a bike connection to the NE Pacific neighborhood greenway. It's definitely an interesting situation with both on-street bike lanes and this thing. I'd say it's close to a mix of T4 and S2 on your wiki page. 

Thanks for your edits!
George Roth, TriMet
rothg@trimet.org
Alex Basau (2024-03-20 08:26:37+00:00): Hi George,

Thank you for catching this issue! It should be corrected now. I hope. I followed the same approach as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/840336907 which is a similar situation.

Your feedback about the correction would appreciated. I am still new at this.

Thank you,
Alex
rothg (2024-03-20 16:40:15+00:00): Hi Alex,
Looks good to me! We're really getting into the weeds with such a complicated intersection. We'll see if anyone else has any input.
Thanks,
-George
ElliottPlack (2024-05-24 04:23:52+00:00): Hi there, these new roads look like part of a subdivision. Would they be better tagged as residential?
akuksouski_lyft (2024-05-24 08:36:55+00:00): Hi, ElliottPlack! You're absolutely right - based on currently available Lyft-owned aerial and street-level imagery, these roads are part of a new townhome community, and the residential class would definitely fit better here. I corrected the highway tags in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151755329 and applied the name for the road, which can be seen on the street sign in Lyft-owned photos(https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ljT4fZ43QuZcuOJ6FY3tlY5vBXGGZah7/view?usp=sharing ). I apologize for this mistake and thank you for pointing it out!

Best regards, 
Alexander
Nakaner (2024-03-15 08:53:24+00:00): Hallo,

wenn ein POI geschlossen hat, ist es nicht korrekt, die Öffnungszeiten nur auf "closed" zu setzen. Selbst die Anwendungen, die Öffnungszeiten auswerten können, werden den POI weiterhin anzeigen. Richtig wäre es, das amenity=restaurant durch disused:amenity=restaurant zu ersetzen.

Könntest du das bitte noch korrigieren?

Viele Grüße

Michael
teatime456 (2024-03-18 09:30:59+00:00): Hi Michael,

danke für den Hinweis! Wurde mittlerweile anscheinend schon erledigt, werde ich beim nächsten Mal aber wie von Dir beschrieben umsetzen.

Liebe Grüße
teatime
zluuzki (2024-03-15 15:46:10+00:00): W782420318,264693301 very clearly existing due to treeline along entire line
zluuzki (2024-03-15 15:45:03+00:00): W332359659 clearly visible on 3DEP/building alignment/cutting
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-31 18:09:41+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11733405474/history has fixme:type = shop that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What kind of shop is here?

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop for common values - is any of them fitting?
okadatsuneo (2025-04-08 05:46:58+00:00): Hello,
I fixed the shop tags.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164661176
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-08 08:23:07+00:00): thanks so much for that!
tom_yorados (2024-03-15 21:04:10+00:00): Hi Hansi. 
Schön, dass Du dabei bist.
Das ist eine tunnel=building_passage
beispiel hier:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/513732921
wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tunnel%3Dbuilding_passage
Du könntest noch 
service=driveway setzen
mit den tags für die Ladestation kenne ich mich nicht aus.

Viele Grüße
ivanbranco (2024-06-08 18:44:14+00:00): Hi StopConsuming_StartProducing, is "(the original one)" really part of the name?
Drebn (2024-03-17 22:34:05+00:00): Die Änderungen erfolgten aufgrund eigener Ortskenntnis und Auskunft der lokalen Forstverwaltung.
osmviborg (2024-03-15 08:11:14+00:00): Mapping parking spaces is an addition, not a replacement, to mapping a whole parking lot with amenity=parking
kortgodt (2024-03-15 09:01:18+00:00): jeg er ikke sikker på hvad det er du vil sige med det?
osmviborg (2024-03-15 11:58:29+00:00): Udenom de enkelte parkeringspladser skal der være en ydre polygon med 'amenity=parking'
b-holdet (2024-03-15 21:17:40+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=parking%20space?uselang=da

"Use amenity=parking_space to map a single parking space on a parking lot. Mapping parking spaces is an addition, not a replacement, to mapping a whole parking lot with amenity=parking."
NorthCrab_upload (2024-03-15 08:10:26+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11733431327

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
zluuzki (2024-03-15 15:43:24+00:00): W21732837 clearly existing at 3DEP, tree lines, vegetation (color) changes
Silva1989 (2024-03-17 12:03:51+00:00): Thanks for improving the map
zluuzki (2024-03-15 15:42:25+00:00): W21735194 clearly existing due to tree lines, field lines, 3DEP, building alignments
Ahmad-0772 (2024-05-09 14:08:59+00:00): Hi LeopoldCanal,

Could you please recheck the roads connections because they are not connected to the bridge and there is a missing road at 36.22347,44.01103.

Regards,
Ahmed
LeopoldCanal (2024-05-14 13:13:11+00:00): Hello Ahmad-0772. The connections and missing road you raised have been addressed. Thank you for your contribution in bettering the map!
BR_pebble (2024-07-18 12:23:01+00:00): Hello Kingsley AMANKWE
Thank you for mapping!
I have fixed duplicate highways on way 1262835920 way 1262835921.
Please inspect your task carefully before closing.
Happy Mapping!
Warin61 (2026-01-23 02:19:01+00:00): My understanding is ...
Highway=crossing used for a footway/cycleway crossing a road. 
Where something crosses a railway then railway=crossing should be used.
❤️‍🔥 (2026-01-23 06:37:43+00:00): agreed, but in this case we might need both tags? since many of these track crossings are controlled by pedestrian traffic-lights

p.s. there's also railway=tram_crossing which might be even more fitting
gamma-aspirin (2024-03-16 02:05:56+00:00): Улицы снесены в связи с расширением санитарной зоны угольного карьера
gamma-aspirin (2024-03-16 02:07:53+00:00): Могу предоставить фото с коптера данной территории
gamma-aspirin (2024-03-16 02:10:38+00:00): Спутниковые снимки из Google Earth, на данный момент, устаревшие и не являются источником достоверной информации.
gamma-aspirin (2024-03-16 02:14:07+00:00): Продолжение улицы Шевцовой не используется ни технологическим, ни гражданским транспортом, на данный момент завалена бытовым и строительным мусором
BR_pebble (2024-07-18 12:22:02+00:00): Hello Kingsley AMANKWE
Thank you for mapping!
I have created the missing highway way 1263708269.
Please inspect your task carefully before closing.
Happy Mapping!
Noktoborus (2024-04-29 11:20:42+00:00): Константин, здравствуйте.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1570574347/history зачем в этой точке traffic_signals? Он уже есть в https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11340732397
Noktoborus (2024-04-29 11:21:41+00:00): В вики рекомендуется использовать или схему с простым расположением traffic_signals (в центре пересечений) или более сложный вариант (на рёбрах дорожного графа), но не смешивать их.
Noktoborus (2024-04-29 11:56:56+00:00): Откатил правку в https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150659685
eggie (2024-03-15 09:55:41+00:00): Dag Tinus

Het lijkt me oke..
Tegenwoordig zie ik steeds meer bij brandgangen
..highway=footway
.. footway=alley
Zie.. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:footway%3Dalley
Groet..
eggie
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-06 05:24:38+00:00): Hello!

Note that you do not need to add description of feature type as a name.
For example when mapping tree it is enough to specify that it is a tree, no need for putting that name of this specific tree is "Tree".

So for buildings it is not needed to put House as their name.

Or do you maybe know that this specific object mapped at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1262844238 is specifically named with such name?

And if it was mistake - can you edit map to remove this name?
    
Do not worry too much about this issue - I made way worse mistakes when I was starting. Maybe some tool or explanation is confusing? Why you added this name? Note that I am asking as maybe something can be fixed to be less confusing.
MxxCon (2024-03-20 02:48:21+00:00): Hello.
Why did you create a multipolygon out of independent buildings? This is not a single building, but an apartment complex of multiple buildings.
This whole situation should've been mapped as simple landuse=residential+residential=apartments area. No need to relation complications..
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148677557
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-15 09:26:14+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 148634651, 148634771, 148659992.
IgorMagellan (2024-04-01 05:55:56+00:00): Приветствую, коллега!
Не согласен с полным удалением ж/д путей. Вы были на местности? Там только рельсы сняли, а вся прочая ж/д структура осталась - 

насыпи, выемки, даже шпалы на месте!  Проехать на велосипеде - скажем так, непросто. Это я к тому, что удаление было неверно.
Лучше бы повесили тег railway=abondoned. Что было бы верно со всех точек зрения. Почитайте вики: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:railway%3Dabandoned
Подожду ваш ответ, и буду пробовать откатить.
DeKaN (2024-04-01 07:16:48+00:00): Обсудили в Телеграме
kapazao (2024-03-15 14:54:38+00:00): Hola, en imágenes a pie de calle aquí veo un pequeño edificio con ventanitas y una parada de bus. No entiendo esto de etiquetar aquí un banco y llamarlo "cajero automatico".
Deberías revisar la wiki al añadir elementos y te recomiendo que leas https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenas_pr%C3%A1cticas_en_Espa%C3%B1a#Etiqueta_name o https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Directrices_de_etiquetado_espa%C3%B1olas#Cajeros_autom%C3%A1ticos_(ATM)
Un saludo
MxxCon (2024-03-20 02:53:48+00:00): Love the use of branch= tag. If only the name= tags could be cleaned up from that SEO spam.👍
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148679338
PlayGuide (2024-04-12 21:10:54+00:00): Bonjour,
J'ai vu que vous avez rajouté cette aire de jeux pour enfants avec le tag landuse=recreation_ground.
Pour ma part je trouve ce tag pas assez spécifique (le wiki aussi d'ailleurs) et je me fie seulement à leisure=playground et playground=* pour notre appli https://playguide.eu
Je souhaiterais comprendre pourquoi vous avez utilisé le tag landuse : est ce par habitude ? Ou bien parce l'éditeur iD que vous avez utilisé vous l'a conseillé ? Ou bien vous n'avez pas fait attention aux tags et juste choisi jeux dans iD ? 
Je vous pose la question car je soupçonne que iD conseille mal à cause de traductions ambiguës.
Merci pour votre éclairage !
Étienne
mawy33 (2024-04-16 10:26:41+00:00): Bonjour,
Déjà merci pour votre application. Je ne la connaissais pas et je me sers souvent d'openstreetmap pour trouver des aires de jeux quand je suis en voyage avec mes enfants. Vous allez me faciliter la tâche :)

Pour répondre à votre question je ne suis pas sûr de la manip que j'ai faite. Je n'ai pas l'habitude de taguer spécifiquement les aires de jeux. Il se trouve que j'ai fait une sortie là-bas récemment pour un autre sujet (vélo) et que j'en ai profité pour tagguer cette aire de jeu. Je pense avoir tapé "jeux" dans le moteur de recherche ID et avoir suivi la recommandation. Me connaissant je pense avoir lu la description (le petit "i" à côté de "aire de jeux" en haut à gauche contenant "An open green space for general recreation, which often includes ..."). Vu que ça me semblait convenir j'ai validé. Donc oui dans votre question si ce n'est pas le bon tag je pense que c'est ID qui oriente mal. J'ai modifié avec leisure=playground car je ne me souviens plus précisément quels jeux il y a.
Bonne journée,
Vincent
PlayGuide (2024-04-16 20:35:26+00:00): Bonjour,
Très heureux que cette discussion vous ait fait découvrir PlayGuide !
Merci pour vos explications détaillées. Pour ma part, je viens d'essayer sur iD, et je n'arrive même pas à faire apparaître la proposition "aire de jeux". Quoique je tappe, il ne me propose que des modules playground=* et ni leisure=playground, ni landuse=recreation_ground ... Il va falloir que j'enquête !
Bonne journée,
Etienne
mawy33 (2024-05-13 22:18:50+00:00): Bonjour, je suis en train d'en cartographier une autre et j'ai reproduit le comportement sur ID. 
1- je dessine un polygone
2- dans la recherche je tape "jeu"
3- la 5e proposition est "Aire de jeux"
4- le tag unique est landuse=recration_ground
J'ai pris des screenshot si besoin.
J'ai pas suivi ce parcours au final et je vais bien utiliser les tags que tu recommandes.
Bonne journée
Vincent
PlayGuide (2024-05-14 06:25:16+00:00): Bonjour,
Merci de relancer ce sujet !
Entre temps j'avais remarqué que ID ne propose pas les même tags si on a sélectionné un nœud ou un polygone. C'est pour ça que leisure=playground et landuse=recreation_ground n'apparaissaient pas des mes premiers tests.
Mais surtout j'ai changé les traductions dans OSM et dans ID. J'ai traduit landuse=recreation_ground en "terrain de loisirs" et leisure=playground en "Aire de jeux pour enfants".
Ex pour ID : https://app.transifex.com/openstreetmap/id-editor/translate/#fr/$/94382419?q=text%3Arecreation
Mes modifications ont bien été prises en compte rapidement dans OSM, mais pas encore dans ID, il va falloir que je me renseigne pour savoir si j'ai oublié une étape de publication ou si c'est normal que ça prenne du temps.
Bonne journée
E.