piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
undofen (2023-05-11 11:58:13+00:00): dyskusja w której mieliśmy różne zdania, co nie oznacza, że wolno Ci usuwać moje zmiany, bo Ty uważasz inaczej. Czy jesteś z tej okolicy? Skąd wiesz czy odzwierciedlają rzeczywistość? Tak :practical jest z natury podatny na subiektywność, jednak Ty, zdalnie, wiesz jaka jest prawda - kolejny samozwańczy admin, dobrze się dobraliście z Yunkersem
woodpeck (2023-07-14 19:19:30+00:00): Dear undofen, user Aim311_ is right. "maxspeed:practical" is not a tag that makes sense in OSM. Please do not accuse the user of being "toxic" for just doing what is right. Please do not add further "maxspeed:practical" tags to OSM. -- DWG Ticket#2023071410000355
ivanbranco (2023-05-11 21:01:32+00:00): I don't think mapping speeds above the legal limit is a good idea.
undofen (2023-05-12 10:53:31+00:00): Hello,
I agree that maxspeed:practical above maxspeed is debatable, but hear me out, and let me know what you think:

On the Polish OSM Wiki (actually not anymore, up until yesterday, someone just pasted the EN version into PL), the maxspeed:practical tag was described as "reasonably achieavable speed putting aside the speed limit". And while that is different from the EN description, I think some differences between countries and their interpretations are ok.

I queried the API for the uses of maxspeed:practical, and both in PL and outside there are many uses where maxspeed:practical is > than maxspeed. My intepretation (and use) of this tag is, "what speed does an average user drive here" - which is what the practical speed kind of is. Not the fastest, not the slowest, but what most people do here. And that in some cases means a bit above the speed limit.

I'm using these values for tuning a self-driving agent for cars, not to tell it how to drive, but to be able to compare its actions to the average speed of a human driver - hence the "real" values, even if they go a bit above the limit are better, because they reflect human driver. The self-driving hardware provides logs with telemetrics of the rides, I'm trying to use a rounded average in good conditions without traffic of how people drive. Capping maxspeed:practical at maxspeed is not the end of the world for me, but I'm not sure of the benefits. The consumer of the data can always discard the values higher than the speed limit, so we would only be removing information making it reflect real-life less - that's my opinion on this.
undofen (2023-05-12 12:18:07+00:00): Ivanbranco, I thought about this a bit more, and now that the Polish WIKI description is also against this, I decided to remove the values when higher than the speed limit. It was debatable when there was something backing this approach up, now there isn't anymore. I've removed most of the instances, I'll remove the rest later today and after that, I will only be adding values lower than the maxspeed.
pmfox (2023-06-19 01:20:55+00:00): Thank you for fixing my tagging errors.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135968653
woodpeck (2023-05-11 10:02:11+00:00): Please refrain from making edits in this area that are suitable to further stoke tensions. The previous mapping as highway=path, foot=yes was perfectly fine for OSM and there was no need to "make this consistent".
habi (2023-05-12 09:42:04+00:00): Hallo Ueli (falls ich laut eurer Seite den richtigen Namen erwischt habe)

Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap!
Schön machst du hier mit und hilfst, die Kartendaten zu pflegen.

Aus meiner Sicht macht es keinen Sinn, dass der Defibrillator *auf* der Wegkreuzung vor der Kirche ist.
Ich habe den Defi *in* den Eingangsbereich der Kirche bewegt.

Gruss aus dem Liebefeld,
habi
Kirchgemeindepräsident (2023-05-12 10:44:50+00:00): Guten Tag Habi

Ich danke dir für die Änderungen, jetzt ist alles richtig inkl. Telefonnummer. 
Gruss Ueli Rüegsegger
Warin61 (2023-12-02 02:50:11+00:00): Hi
Way 1171531881 addr:interpolation=even includes an odd number...
Vadmium (2023-12-02 04:16:00+00:00): Fixed 1171531881 and also w1171531865
logir (2023-06-02 12:39:25+00:00): Ciao, 
Di recente il Comune ha aggiunto dei sentieri con paline che battono più o meno quelle zone. Link: https://www.viviceresole.it/it-it/download/planimetria-sentieri-7574-37-707-cb0d8a812bc53f4252977074205034ce
Questi itinerari che hai aggiunto invece dove sono segnalati?
Volevo capire se potevamo fare pulizia, se servisse.
LarsBG (2023-05-13 08:25:40+00:00): Hej osmviborg Dette ser ikke rigtig ud socket:tesla_supercharger_ccs. Måske se her https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:socket
osmviborg (2023-05-13 10:37:19+00:00): En bruger ved navn Maarten Deen havde tilføjet det til en adresse- node. Ladepunkter er ikke noget jeg gør i.
LarsBG (2023-05-13 11:07:18+00:00): Ok. Det kan jeg ikke se. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10802035931/history Skal jeg forstå at Maarten Deen er slettet fra historien. Beklager at jeg ikke kan gennemskue hvem og hvordan det er tilføjet.
osmviborg (2023-05-13 12:01:24+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9627126117/history
antonr (2023-05-28 13:17:19+00:00): Jeg har spurgt Maarten ovre i https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135964660.
LarsBG (2023-05-29 10:14:36+00:00): Tak.  Spændende at se svaret.
user_5359 (2023-05-13 05:30:15+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/955010347. What is the mean of the tag meroghar = yes?
mueschel (2023-05-14 09:45:37+00:00): Hi,
what does 'recycling:kov' mean? This tag is not used in other places.
menganito (2023-05-24 13:29:16+00:00): Should have been metal, fixed now.
trial (2023-07-25 22:03:44+00:00): Hi, you are changing the parking keys from the new to the old schema. If that's really wanted, you should get in touch with the developer of the validator https://github.com/osm-fr/osmose-backend/blob/master/plugins/Highway_Parking_Lane.py#L110 

Changing back and forth doesn't make sense. And I believe you agree with that ;-).
mueschel (2023-07-26 06:23:53+00:00): Hi,
not quite... the new scheme would be parking:right:restriction=no_parking. But my edit here was clearly a mistake. Feel free to correct it or I'll do it later.
trial (2023-07-26 11:18:25+00:00): Looking at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:parking:right (and ID - not a reference, I know) say parking:right=no.
According to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Street_parking, parking:right:restriction=no_parking means it's illegal. Here it's simply physically not possible. Except for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/174167162 (forbidden due to construction work).
So thanks to your mistake, I learned how to tag both!
Ti_Ru (2023-05-11 12:20:00+00:00): Hi, 

This is clearly an internal road within an institution. Why are repeatedly changing the highway type to Motorway. Please refer OSM wiki pages to know about highway classification. You can't change public data wrongfully for your project needs.
aashique (2023-05-11 13:03:27+00:00): Hi, 
sorry for the trouble , I am a masters student in anna university trying to learn about this tool , just tried to export the OSM file of the college roads the change  I made is only  meant for temporary and i planned to revoke the changes asap once  downloded the OSM . I didn't meant to manipulate the Public data.I wont repeat the same in future.
perusluku (2023-05-11 10:44:43+00:00): Siis Roihupellon
cyton (2023-05-11 10:26:36+00:00): https://www.mapillary.com/app/?menu=false&lat=52.63158729999998&lng=13.304982399999972&z=19.9&pKey=1188223815157817&focus=photo&x=0.1808424074037005&y=0.5065597601537841&zoom=1.074644435263569&panos=true
chris66 (2023-05-11 14:16:34+00:00): Yep, ist eindeutig ein lower-kerb :-)

Danke fürs fixen.
Jonathan Masur (2023-05-17 20:19:05+00:00): Bonjour,
Est-ce que la route principale "1" a réellement été détournée de la sorte, avec la signalisation correspondante (panneaux bleus et signe "1") ?
Merci.
stedewa (2023-05-18 17:43:35+00:00): Je regarderai plus attentivement prochainement... mais ça faut plus de 10 ans que c'est légalisé ainsi par le canton, dans le dos d'une décision du conseil communal...
stedewa (2023-05-25 14:53:48+00:00): A la sortie d'autoroute Morges-Ouest, impossible de savoir si il faut prendre à gauche ou à droite pour aller sur Préverenges par exemple. (Il n'y a que Bière et St-Prex qui comptent)
Jonathan Masur (2023-05-29 20:13:52+00:00): Pouvez-vous me dire à quoi vous faites référence lorsque vous mentionnez que "c'est légalisé ainsi par le canton"?

Pour moi la source qui fait foi est la signalisation en place sur le terrain. Panneau bleus avec numéros = route primaire sur OSM, panneaux bleus sans numéros = route secondaire sur OSM, panneaux blancs = rotue tertiaire sur OSM, c.f. selon les pages suivantes :

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway:International_equivalence

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Switzerland:Main_Roads

Si vous n'avez pas une raison solide de changer le tracé de la route "1", je le remettrai selon la signalisation en place lors de mon prochain passage à Morges.
stedewa (2023-06-01 14:49:00+00:00): J'ai fait selon document : Règlement 725.01.2 sur la classification des routes cantonales (RCRC) du 23 mai 2012 : 
https://www.vd.ch/fileadmin/user_upload/organisation/dinf/sr/fichiers_pdf/R%C3%A9seau_routier_Reglement_sur_la_classification_des_routes_cantonales_-_RCRC.pdf
stedewa (2023-06-01 14:50:28+00:00): Je pensais pratiquer selon : 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Switzerland:Vaud/%C3%89tat_des_routes_cantonales#Routes_principales_qui_ne_sont_pas_signal%C3%A9es_par_une_%C2%ABPlaque_num%C3%A9rot%C3%A9e_pour_routes_principales%C2%BB_(4.57)_(Routes_secondaire_dans_OSM)
mueschel (2023-05-13 15:13:48+00:00): Please check the Wiki for proper destination tags. E.g. "destination:lang:en:lanes", not "destination:lane:en".
mga_geo (2023-05-23 18:27:20+00:00): Bonsoir,
Les relations route=bus sont cassées.
Marc
Anton_Klebanovich (2023-06-08 14:07:32+00:00): Bonjour! Merci pour vos retours, j'en tiendrai compte à l'avenir.
Hello! Thanks for your feedback, I'll take that into account in the future.
Hufkratzer (2023-05-11 21:22:48+00:00): Hi,
das ist doch nur die Reithalle, die auf der Webseite beschrieben ist. Das horse_riding-Tag ist aber nicht für Reithallen, sondern für die gesamte Anlage gedacht, wozu z.B. auch der Reitplatz gehört. Daher hätte ich das anders getaggt, vgl.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:building=riding_hall
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure=horse_riding
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/203691064
Fijord (2023-05-26 07:51:58+00:00): Hallo Hufkratzer
Vielen Dank für deinen Hinweis, habe es geändert.
Gruss Fijord
mga_geo (2023-05-14 19:34:26+00:00): Bonsoir,
Une nouvelle série de relations route=bus cassées  r2263646,r11654496,r9773808,r11655771
Marc
mga_geo (2023-05-17 05:42:20+00:00): Bonjour,
Toujours pas de corrections ?
Marc
mga_geo (2023-05-23 18:27:57+00:00): Les corrections vont venir ?
Anton_Klebanovich (2023-06-08 08:03:45+00:00): Bonjour! Merci pour vos retours, j'en tiendrai compte à l'avenir.
Hello! Thanks for your feedback, I'll take that into account in the future.
Marek-M (2023-05-11 12:15:28+00:00): Czy (biała) jest w nazwie szkoły? Jeśli nie, to poprawnie ta nazwa powinna wyglądać tak: 'Szkoła Podstawowa nr 37'
silversurfer83 (2023-05-11 13:02:21+00:00): Grüße nach Altenburg :)

Hier ein kleiner Hinweis zum Thema Namen
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen
Will sagen: Das "jetzt überwuchert" gehört, wenn überhaupt, in das Feld "Beschreibung" ("description=")
Wenn man dort nicht mehr entlang kann, kann man aus dem highway=track ggf. ein abandoned:highway=track machen

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135972891
eggie (2023-05-11 11:42:45+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
infeeeee (2023-05-13 12:07:47+00:00): Hello! Welcome to OpenStreetMap!

You don't have to add area=yes on buildings, that's the default. Removed here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136050368

Happy mapping!
MaciekMma (2023-05-11 20:09:57+00:00): Czesc, jestes pewien, ze tak sciezka tam faktycznie istnieje? Usunalem ją okolo 4 tygodnie temu poniewaz po remoncie torow nie bylo jej. Proboealem z niej skorzystac, ale wszystko bylo rozkopane, zawalone ziemia albo wykopany row, malo miejsca przy ogrodzeniu, nikt tamtedy nie chodzil. Ale to bylo 4 tygodnie temu....
SomeoneElse (2023-05-11 12:36:15+00:00): The sources for this edit included: 
OS OpenData StreetView (used for note about old road status)
OS OpenMap Local (used for note about newer road status)
Bing imagery (hedges, trees, etc.)
A video provided by a local (tracktype, gates, hedges, walls etc).
SomeoneElse (2023-05-11 12:46:01+00:00): The gate at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10886350135 has a sign saying "private" on it, but in this edit I've not added explicit access tags to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1168918378 .  I've added "motor_vehicle=private" to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1171570694 based on the sign at the north.
I have not (yet) set foot, bicycle or horse access tags.  
Generally speaking in Scotland, https://www.outdooraccess-scotland.scot/ should apply.  See https://www.outdooraccess-scotland.scot/sites/default/files/2018-05/Publication%202005%20-%20Scottish%20Outdoor%20Access%20Code.pdf for an English PDF version.
SomeoneElse (2023-05-11 12:58:21+00:00): If anyone wishes to comment publicly, please do so here.  If anyone wants to comment privately, please do so by emailing data@openstreetmap.org with a subject of "[Ticket#2023050810000254] changeset 135974161".
The PPPenguin (2023-05-11 16:33:58+00:00): Hi Someone else

Please refer to https://www.inverclyde.gov.uk/faqs/71/roads/797/how-do-i-know-if-my-street-is-adopted-as-public-and-maintained-by-the-council
to review the statutory public road register for Inverclyde. The North section of Overton Road is a public road with rights of public passage in all modes (motor vehicle, foot, bicycle and horse). The Southern section was delisted by the Council in October 2022. It is a private road, however, only in the sense that it is now privately maintained. The rights of public passage for all modes remains unchanged. This was recently clarified with woodpeck only 2 days ago and he revised the map accordingly. see [Ticket#2023050510000125]

The PPPenguin
nyampire (2023-05-13 06:30:19+00:00): OSMへようこそ、編集をレビューしました。

とてもよく描けています、素晴らしいです！
1つだけ、変更セット https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135975036#map=15/38.1106/140.8883 で、道路のノードを離れた位置にドラッグしてしまっていたようです。

道路自体は直しておきましたので、ご確認ください。
もし「やってしまった！」と思った場合、変更を保存する前にブラウザを更新したり、iDエディタの「戻す」で戻してみたりするとよいでしょう。

もし保存してしまった後に気がついた場合は、ご連絡をいただければ巻き戻しします。
気軽にお声がけください。

これからも編集を続けていただけると嬉しいです。
Happy Mapping！
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135974674
Branko Kokanovic (2023-05-11 14:27:41+00:00): Hi Qazim,
3-4 years ago, both Serbia and Kosovo community synced in Telegram chat and agreed on borders. Kosovo has its own set and Serbia has cadastre data too. Borders are mostly the same, but where they were different, we split them and added tags "claimed_administrative" and "according_to". Both communities agreed on proposals and this is how we keep them. I will mention this change in Kosovo telegram group (https://t.me/osmkosovo - feel free to drop by there to discuss if you want), but if you don't mind, I would like to revert this changeset, to keep previous borders. Ok?
Branko Kokanovic (2023-05-12 15:36:30+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136024056. Please discuss this with Kosovo or Serbia community before making such large changes. I hope you understand, thanks
NorthCrab_upload (2023-05-11 12:32:39+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o miejscowości. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, zastosuj kombinację addr:city + addr:street. Jeśli nie, przekaż nazwę miejscowości w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1066202528

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
user_1566574 (2023-06-17 13:56:56+00:00): Hello ! Wow, bravo pour l'ajout de toutes ces méthodes de paiement, très impressionnant !

Merci pour cette contribution très complète ! :)
Baptiste Mourey (2023-06-26 19:36:15+00:00): Rien d'extraordinaire, je connais bien l'endroit ;)
NorthCrab_upload (2023-05-11 12:40:17+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1066202528

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
user_15629788 (2023-05-11 16:52:18+00:00): Dankje, ik moet het importeren van referentiemateriaal nog onder de knie krijgen
sorcrosc (2023-06-06 22:21:36+00:00): Questo era già stato mappato a marzo:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10701487013
Temo non sia l'unico caso.
Fate dei controlli su questi "update"?
SomeoneElse (2023-05-11 12:59:15+00:00): See comments on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135974161 .
If anyone wishes to comment publicly, please do so on that changeset. If anyone wants to comment privately, please do so by emailing data@openstreetmap.org with a subject of "[Ticket#2023050810000254] changeset 135974161".
aixbrick (2023-05-13 10:11:01+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OSM,
leider musste ich alle von dir gemachten Änderungen zurücksetzen, habe aber die ursprüngliche Intention (Wege als Privat zu markieren) umgesetzt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136046938.
Privatwege, die vor Ort existieren, werden in OSM nicht gelöscht, sondern mit einer Zugangsbeschränkung  (access) versehen. Damit werden sie von Routern ignoriert und auf Karten i.d.R. anders dargestellt (auf https://www.openstreetmap.org/ z.B. weiß/grau schraffiert). Bitte auch keine Namen wie "Privatgrundstück" setzen. Der gelöschte Parkplatz war bereits mit access=private versehen. Auch die Änderungen an der Landnutzung (du hast versehntlich ganz Lammersdorf zu einer Wiese umgeändert) habe ich rückgängig gemacht.
Ob der von dir gelöschte Hydrant tatsächlich nicht vorhanden ist oder ob er einfach nur an einer anderen Stelle ist, müsste nochmal geklärt werden. Bitte beachte beim Löschen solcher Informationen, dass diese auch von Hilfsorganisationen (Feuerwehr...) genutzt werden.
Gruß
eggie (2023-05-11 14:32:25+00:00): Welcome to OSM in the Netherlands ...   Please tag at the addressnodes.
I merged your info with the present addressnode 

Greetz,
eggie
Dodko (2023-05-24 08:51:36+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10886526280
Prístrešok tam už jeden je, postavili teraz nový?
Dodko (2023-05-24 08:53:47+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1170373034
ak je tam zvonica sú potrebné aj značky
man_made=tower + tower:type=bell_tower
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bell_tower
Filip009 (2023-06-27 15:09:52+00:00): Nejaké fotky tých troch cyklosmerovníkov "Brdárske čerešňové sady"?
APneunzehn74 (2023-08-15 10:50:26+00:00): Laut Website und dem Hinweis https://www.hartl-group.de/impressum/ ist hier ist hier immer noch die Hartl group. Oder befinden sich zwei Firmen in dem Gebäude?
Grüße APneunzehn74
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-01 14:26:47+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/420917643/history has de = Mayo that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What you intended to express by using this unusual key? Is this tag needed? Or maybe can it be expressed in a more typical way that would be easier to understand?
Xvtn (2023-05-11 17:52:41+00:00): These changes you've made are reversing work done toward following this standard: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Utah/Naming_Conventions

What comments are you referring to as your source?

***These roads are signed on the ground without any directional prefix.*** Both the way locals refer to the streets, and the way they are signed in real life is "1000 North", etc.
Xvtn (2023-05-11 17:53:39+00:00): Oh no! They were my comments!! Sorry, I thought this was more of the previous type of edits combining prefix, etc. Thanks for reviewing this past work!!
KarinaLis (2023-05-15 15:26:59+00:00): Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135977767
user_3022894 (2023-05-11 14:33:27+00:00): Hi,

die surface für den Rad- und den Gehweg getrennt einzutragen brauchst du doch nur, wenn es ein getrennter Geh- und Radweg (segregated=yes) ist :D

Finde es zugegeben selbst etwas unnötig, die surfaces so quasi doppelt auszudrücken, aber SC macht das schon nur bei getrennten Geh- und Radwegen, nicht bei gemeinsamen.

LG Lukas
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-05-11 13:48:23+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 135572563, 135572702, 135574178, 135574750, 135574924, 135576759, 135665973, 135743925, 135743978, 135744970, 135775440, 135776001, 135776126, 135776235, 135776742, 135776894, 135776969, 135777172, 135777348, 135777403, 135777778, 135777973, 135799721, 135799918, 135800013, 135800538, 135856334, 135856399, 135856592, 135856868, 135858315, 135901394, 135901541, 135902703, 135928292, 135928398, 135928487, 135963463, 135963660, 135963881, 135964291, 135964323, 135964534, 135971724, 135971792, 135971833, 135972046, 135972301, 135972326.
DiogoBaptista98 (2023-05-16 00:31:47+00:00): Av Dr Luís Sá (Posto Abast) (10290801166) You grabbed a bus stop node and accidentally moved it, I ask you to be more careful, I already corrected the error. Thank you
Cyclono (2023-05-16 06:30:05+00:00): Hello, well did you notice how much I edited here. 1 or 2 errors is quite understandable and normal
eggie (2023-05-11 14:22:55+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback :  Dit is de simpele manier. Meestal worden alle verkeerslichtinstallaties apart getagd op de weg met traffic_signals:direction =forward / backward (ligt aan de richting van de weg)
Dat zullen er hier wel wel een viertal stuks zijn. 
Maar er staat nu tenminste een verkeerslicht. Bezwaar is wel dat het op de oversteekplaats staat. Ben dus benieuwd wat je straks op de kaart zult zien.
Op een crossing kun je namelijk ook aangeven hoe de oversteek is beveiligd.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dcrossing

crossing=traffic_signals - regulated with light signals
De tagging loopt hier dus een beetje door elkaar. 
Zie

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtraffic_signals

Dus helemaal goed is het dus niet. 
Hier een willekeurig kruispunt als voorbeeld. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/52.14905/5.38459

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
mv&m (2023-05-12 06:38:25+00:00): Dag Eggie,

Bedankt voor de terugkoppeling!
mv&m (2023-05-12 06:43:18+00:00): Situatie op de grond is dat er aan beide kanten van de rijbaan, voor beide rijrichtingen, een verkeerslicht voor het autoverkeer staat, plus nog een tweetal verkeerslichten voor voetgangers. In totaal staan er dus zes verkeerslichten op dit kruispunt.
eggie (2023-05-12 06:49:52+00:00): Hoi...
Je zou het nu bij vier kunnen laten.. want de voetgangersoversteek is niet ingetekend.
Langsliggende voetpaden worden vaak opgenomen in het fietspad of hoofdrijbaan met sidewalk=left of right (soms both).. ligt aan de richting van de ingetekende weg.
Mapse
eggie
silversurfer83 (2023-05-11 15:44:32+00:00): Hallo Stephan :)
dein Gedanke in v5 dieses Weges war schon ganz gut. Nun in v6 hast du durch "access=yes" wieder einen Widerspruch eingebracht.
Gibt es rechtlich bindede Beschilderung für diesen Weg? Wenn ja, wie GENAU sieht diese aus? Daraus können wir dann die Berechtigungen sauber ziehen.

Grüße
silversurfer83