piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Marek-M (2025-01-02 14:29:31+00:00): Faktycznie z postu wynika zakaz również dla rowerów. W komentarzach zapytałem PKM, czy dorzucą wyjątek dla rowerzystów do znaku. Może uda się to załatwić :)
czebureks (2026-04-09 11:36:40+00:00): Wracając do tematu - niedawno sprawdziłem od strony portu lotniczego i  dobra wiadomość jest taka, że po zakazach został już tylko słupek. Może dałbyś radę sprawdzić kiedyś, jak to wygląda od strony Rębiechowa?
Marek-M (2026-04-10 07:13:44+00:00): Mówisz i masz - podjechałem dzisiaj od strony Rębiechowa i niestety znak zakazu ruchu ma się dobrze :( Aktualne foto:
https://i.imgur.com/woY1nFm.jpeg
arcanma (2025-01-04 15:30:14+00:00): Salve Pakmo,
per cortesia se vuoi migliorare l'allineamento o altri dettagli cerca di farlo modificando gli elementi presenti piuttosto che cancellarli e rifarli da zero, perché altrimenti si perde tutta la cronologia dell'elemento
Justin1234 (2025-09-17 19:59:17+00:00): The library is just 1 thing in the building though; it's not the entire building
Justin1234 (2025-10-24 00:29:35+00:00): Hi, I just converted it back to a point.
RedAuburn (2025-01-02 02:18:17+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4572275
ezio_m (2025-01-02 02:27:08+00:00): aggiunta parcheggio bici
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-02 02:53:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 160891524 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some obvious vandalism by user blocked at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17052
user_22473028 (2025-02-07 18:21:11+00:00): *-SomeoneElse_Revert so what you're saying is reverting obvious vandalism is obvious vandalism? This seems wrong sure.
SomeoneElse (2025-02-11 19:58:20+00:00): Have a look at e.g. https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/osm-deep-history/#/way/13465548 to see the actual tag changes here.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-13 00:58:31+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164876477
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-02 02:41:51+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 160888754, 160888904, 160889000, 160889236.
user_22473028 (2025-02-07 18:22:39+00:00): For your information, this changeset does not revert ANY edits in changeset 160889000 sure. That was reverted by a different changeset which this vandle then decided to revert.
scruss (2025-04-12 01:54:39+00:00): Dunno where you got the electrification proposals from, but Metrolinx haven't shared those yet with people in Toronto
wolfy1339 (2025-04-12 01:58:59+00:00): I'm not the one who originally added that. I just made sure it was consistently tagged.
wolfy1339 (2025-04-12 02:03:19+00:00): Actually, Metrolinx has already disclosed the type of electrification in their documentation.
https://assets.metrolinx.com/image/upload/v1737998921/Documents/Engineering/CPG_Performance_Specifications_for_ET_EW.pdf

Section 1.2

« The Metrolinx Electrification system shall be a 2 x 25 kV ac (1 x 25 kV ac in the limits of the Pearson 
subdivision), 60 Hz autotransformer traction electrification system. »
scruss (2025-04-12 13:25:01+00:00): Okay, but consistently tagged + fictional are still not ground verifiable features. The electrification project has no budget yet, so even if it's marked under construction by the Ontario govt, it's not happening soon (Go to https://www.ontario.ca/page/building-ontario-transit, search for "electrification" and see that "OnCORR (Package 3 - Electrification)" has a TBD completion date and no budget. These changes should be backed out because they're not ground verifiable. We're stuck with diesels for now
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-02 02:53:19+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 160891291.
user_22473028 (2025-02-07 18:24:04+00:00): Fyi changeset 160891291 actually reverted obvious vandleism, which you refverted for the sole reason of looking like a goody two shoes sure.
NeisBot (2025-01-02 03:20:38+00:00): Hi Brisbane City Council Natural Environment, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 99% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 2 highway(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=160891809
pitscheplatsch (2025-01-02 09:24:37+00:00): Thanks for your private message.

Do you know the following wiki page about mapped MTB trails in OSM?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F
woodpeck_repair (2025-01-02 09:30:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 160898387 where the changeset comment is: revert trail deletions. please use proper access tags and discuss larger deletions on community forum before you act
Johnny Mapperseed (2026-03-10 19:40:19+00:00): Friendly heads up: This edit reintroduced the old city admin building in Bowling Green, Ohio that was previously noted as demolished.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-01-02 08:35:32+00:00): So, these paths are existing but passage there is unwelcome?

Or is it outright illegal? If illegal, what is legal basis for that?

Note that paths that are merely illegal to use/heavily restricted should be marked as such, not deleted
pitscheplatsch (2025-01-02 09:25:34+00:00): Sama as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160891809
woodpeck_repair (2025-01-02 09:30:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 160898387 where the changeset comment is: revert trail deletions. please use proper access tags and discuss larger deletions on community forum before you act
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-01-07 22:06:10+00:00): This changeset removed the building tag from 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1112751112/history
robby_rumble (2025-01-16 15:37:24+00:00): Howdy, can you please tell me more about why you added a stream here? It's causing this entire area to render as a body of water. Thanks in advance
Apocalix11 (2025-01-16 17:53:16+00:00): I was looking for a cool app for create maps for my d&ds based on real world's cities. After I spend some time to understand this app I undestood that this wasn't for me and I forgot to delete this map...
Apocalix11 (2025-01-16 17:54:53+00:00): And now I released that I don't know how to do that.
robby_rumble (2025-01-16 17:58:38+00:00): No worries. I went ahead and reverted your changes. Thanks for the quick response!
Glassman (2025-01-05 18:55:27+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

 please read the wiki on how to add your business to OSM. You might want to start with https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dcomputer. Also your address is the same as another business in the same building, including suite number. 

I'm going to remove the non standard tags so hopefully you will add the correct ones.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160892407
BCNorwich (2025-01-02 06:44:54+00:00): Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Actually, these highways do connect to a pedestrian area highway, so they are not really disconnected. Whether they are considered routable by apps or by yourself is not reasonable grounds to delete them. Anything that is ground truth and verifiable is welcomed in the OSM database. If you can't make amendments to correct the problems you see this again is not reason for deletion. Best to leave it, maybe someone else can make improvements.

Thus I've reverted the deletions.

Regards Bernard.
Kovoschiz (2025-01-02 05:15:53+00:00): Please be careful of the preset meanings. This is not an entire `building=`
Kovoschiz (2025-01-02 05:18:25+00:00): (Fixed)
pitfire (2025-01-02 04:50:14+00:00): Hi gernl,

welcome to OSM and thank you for your contribution.

Please describe your change sets according to the rule:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Here's some more reading material

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice

VG pitfire
Gurkenhorn (2025-01-02 11:06:47+00:00): Hi Pitfire,

I am sorry for missing this. I don't see any way to update the changeset command in advance, but I will make sure to use it in the future.
haihaus (2025-01-02 05:06:47+00:00): Asking for a review just because I've never done a road before, tried to match to county and aerial data as best I could.
mueschel (2025-01-03 11:00:46+00:00): Hi,
I found these name tags in your edits:
name:zh_pinyin
name:zh_zhuyin

These are not used in other places, because the common tags are:

name:zh-Latn-pinyin
name:zh-Bopo

Could you have a look and change this?
rudychung (2025-01-03 14:14:05+00:00): Sure, no problem. I would find a time in these two weeks to make the correction.

Thank you for your kindly reminder.  ^^
mueschel (2025-01-03 14:23:14+00:00): Hi,
if you like, I can just change the tags, that's not much work.
rudychung (2025-01-03 14:27:21+00:00): It would be great. Thank you very much.  ^^
mueschel (2025-01-03 14:34:29+00:00): Done.

There are two more nodes with a strange tag I can't fix:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12468292272
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12468292274
rudychung (2025-01-03 16:25:58+00:00): Thanks, mueschel.  ^^

What is the key of the strange tag?
mueschel (2025-01-03 16:28:03+00:00): 基石 =  	礦物課1097號
基石 =  	市11
felipeeugenio (2025-01-02 17:51:51+00:00): Hola Andrés. Estás revisando Telegram? porque hay cosas acá que no son muy compatibles con OSM. Hablemos por ahí
Pero en general te pedimos por favor conversar este tipo de cosas con la comunidad. Así te ahorras trabajo que después no sirve mucho.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160893670
skquinn (2025-01-02 05:56:43+00:00): Oops, sources should have included "web search"
eggie (2025-01-02 08:28:54+00:00): Dag karazz,

Je vraagt feedback.. Dit klopt inderdaad meer met de actuele situatie.

MVG
eggie
citrula (2025-01-02 20:19:45+00:00): Welcome to OSM. Your edits are visible to everyone, so please be mindful of what you add, like the giant building in this changeset. I have reverted this edit.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160924732
Negreheb (2025-09-08 11:11:22+00:00): Das ist ja von außen nirgends zu sehen, dass das Haus "Haus Wilhelm und Grete Lanz" heisst. Das wirkt, als würden hier private Daten veröffentlicht werden, ich werde den Namen erstmal löschen. 
Alles gute :)
ilias_ (2025-01-05 01:35:51+00:00): Hi! You changed the residential roads to foot paths. In fact, these are not foot paths because cars go through there. However this might not be obvious through aerial imagery because they are made of paving stones. I found this video of the project https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IwgSRow0acg&t=72s
And as you can see these roads are used by cars. Maybe they are more living streets than residential roads?
nona mostafa (2025-01-05 09:59:47+00:00): Hi, ilias
Thank you for pointing this out and providing the video for clarification I have  already modified the classification to living street
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161012939
Thanks again!
Best regards,
nona mostafa
ilias_ (2025-01-05 15:32:29+00:00): Thanks nona mostafa, great work!
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-28 17:25:46+00:00): Hello!

You used
access=nox
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12468358838/history

Have you maybe meant
access=no
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
GrabMY_ainayusof (2025-05-08 09:24:10+00:00): Hi Mateusz Konieczny. 

Seems like there is typo error in this changeset. I have fixed the access tag into 
access=no

Thanks for highlighting the error!
RicoElectrico (2025-09-19 19:37:03+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4940422
uprkos (2025-10-11 22:34:50+00:00): Możesz rzucić okiem na https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4860583? 

Nie znalazłem nigdzie takiej nazwy,
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-20 12:51:50+00:00): wysłałem PW
ratrun (2025-01-03 04:49:28+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM.

Can you please explain your change here. It does not make sense to me and deepl translates your changeset comment into "Following deliberation by the CM in September 2024" which does not make sense either.
Currently the road is interrupted and lacking connectivity, see OSM inspector routing view  https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=2.10659&lat=48.78191&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=unconnected_open_ends_1

thanks

ratrun
Philurba (2025-01-03 08:15:21+00:00): There was confusion between “rue de Dampierre” and “la route de Dampierre” creating delivery difficulties and above all a waste of time for emergency services. The Municipal Council therefore decided to change the name of the road: “route de Dampierre” becomes “route de Satory” from Place des Frères Perret until leaving the Guyancourt territory.
ratrun (2025-01-03 08:51:56+00:00): OK thank you. You changed the name, but why did you remove the highway tag? See https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/809915095/history
Philurba (2025-01-03 09:09:17+00:00): This is a mistake.
I'm starting. I just wanted to change the name of the route.
But can you explain to me (or do it) how to change all the mentions "route de Dampierre" to "route de Satory" in one go? Thanks
ratrun (2025-01-03 09:28:12+00:00): Sorry I can`t help you with instructions for ID as I'm not familiar with the ID web editor. I just use JOSM as it is much better. But I can perform the change for you if you like. Please give me instructions where to change the name. From your description it looks to me as if the name "Route de Dampierre" needs to be replaced on all the segments, such that there does not remain any segment with that name finally. Please confirm.
Philurba (2025-01-03 10:26:06+00:00): Yes it's exactly that :
"Route de Dampierre" replaced by "route de Satory" on all the segments.
I'm going to try JOSM.
Tanks for your help !
ratrun (2025-01-03 12:59:08+00:00): Thank you for confirmation!

I now changed the names according to your instructions above, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160947436#map=16/48.77957/2.09820

Please note that I didn't change the name yet for the segments further in the south here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/22675305#map=18/48.767370/2.068825 
I used the search functionality of JOSM for  the name replacement, but intentionally didn't apply the name change for these  segments as they seem to be too far awway. Or shall I also change the name here?

Good luck with your JOSM attempt! I recommend watching an introduction video before starting. People say that JOSM is more difficult to use compared to ID, but for me the opposite is the case.
Philurba (2025-01-03 13:49:26+00:00): thank you again for your help. The name change stops at Place Frères Perret (intersection with boulevard jean Jaurès : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160896885#map=19/48.770958/2.082739)
The southern part must not be touched. I hadn't seen these other changes yet.
BCNorwich (2025-01-08 08:38:03+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've reinstated the correct tags to Manor Lane. Also made a few tweaks. Please don't alter the OSM data in order suit personal preferences.

Regards Bernard.
MikKent (2025-01-08 09:27:15+00:00): I am not sure what you mean OSM data and personal preferences, correct data is what is required. Nothing personal unless you class the house being in the wrong identifiers, the house in google maps appears to be within the confines of the village.
Yes OS numbers do tally with the actually house but not where it appears in maps
Dawid2849 (2025-01-02 17:15:31+00:00): Oo, miałem się dzisiaj brać za poprawę, ale mnie uprzedziłeś :P
Dzięki!
grelus (2025-01-03 06:42:55+00:00): Cześć. Tak. Wrysowałem z terenu ale jak się pojawi lepszy podkład orto to trzeba będzie to poprostować. Pozdro.
Dawid2849 (2025-01-03 14:49:39+00:00): Polecam BDOT500. Usługa nie jest dostępna w każdym powiecie w Polsce, ale akurat w stalowowolskim jest. https://integracja.gugik.gov.pl/cgi-bin/KrajowaIntegracjaBazDanychObiektowTopograficznych?TRANSPARENT=TRUE&BBOX={bbox}&CRS={proj}&FORMAT=image/jpeg&HEIGHT={height}&LAYERS=bdot&REQUEST=GetMap&SERVICE=WMS&STYLES=&VERSION=1.3.0&WIDTH={width}

jeśli będziesz chciał użyć w iD, to należy zmienić TRANSPARENT=TRUE na FALSE
Mapa dostępności BDOT500: https://integracja.gugik.gov.pl/cgi-bin/KrajowaIntegracjaBazDanychObiektowTopograficznych
Dawid2849 (2025-01-03 14:51:16+00:00): a tutaj znajduje się opis tej usługi: https://www.geoportal.gov.pl/pl/dane/baza-danych-obiektow-topograficznych-bdot500/

bardzo przydatna rzecz przy nowych inwestycjach
woodpeck_repair (2025-01-02 09:30:10+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 160891809, 160891870.
houtari (2025-01-28 17:58:02+00:00): Kenttien alt_name & short_name eivät pysyneet tässä uudelleennumeroinnissa ihan synkassa name-arvon kanssa
os-emmer (2025-04-25 20:15:29+00:00): Hallo AndySchulte,
ich habe grade ein Adresse bearbeitet und erst danach gesehen, dass du zuvor genau die gegenteilige Änderung durchgeführt hast:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/67265776/history
Laut https://www.motel-24h.de/de/index.html liegt das Hotel/Motel in Hannover und nicht in Isernhagen. Übersehe ich da was?
syenit (2025-04-27 11:44:00+00:00): Zdravím, z jakého důvodu jste vyjmul ulici Hlučínská a část Sokolské třídy ze silnic I. třídy a přiřadil je mezi silnice III. třídy? Rovněž jste smazal i číslo silnice 56. Z jakého zdroje informací vycházíte, že se nejedná o silnici I. třídy a není to silnice č. 56? Dnes jsem byl na místě a osobně ověřil, že silnice je označena dopravní značkou "Číslo silnice" 56 (tj. silnice I. třídy). Díky za odpověď.
Honza Mareš123657 (2025-04-27 11:57:54+00:00): Zdravím je to rozhodnutím RSD a MSK o přeřazení komunikace z 1.tr na místní komunikaci
syenit (2025-04-27 12:14:10+00:00): Díky. Je to rozhodnutí ŘSD někde veřejně dostupné? Trochu jsem zjišťoval, ale nikde jsem to nenašel. Rovněž mi to nesedělo, jelikož ŘSD má na svém geoportále vedené tyto ulice jako silnice I. třídy, parcely vlastní ŘSD (což by nasvědčovalo silnici I. třídy). Popřípadě pokud máte jiné informace o jakou třídu místní komunikace se má jednat? Podle značení OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:%C4%8Cesko/Zna%C4%8Den%C3%AD_silnic), by to tak jak je to značeno teď v mapě měla být MK III. třídy, což mi vzhledem k reálnému využívaní a vytížení komunikace rozhodně nesedí na obslužnou MK III. třídy.
Honza Mareš123657 (2025-04-28 04:28:27+00:00): Dobrý den,
rozhodnutí z 27. listopadu 24 je neveřejné a po kontrole je od ministerstva dopravy. Důvodem přeřazení je 4 pruhova ulice Místecká pro tranzitní dopravu. 
Vydržte změna na geoportslu RSD se projeví v příští aktualizaci ULS ve druhé polovině leta
NorthCrab_upload (2025-01-02 10:11:00+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9195136023
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12089153514
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1347941363
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1347941364

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Glassman (2025-01-07 15:47:12+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

the majority of tags do not even come close to OSM standards. Reverting
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160899856
mavl (2025-02-05 14:03:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162167075 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted. Reason: wrong values for name:en - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161608012].
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-06-21 18:04:56+00:00): Do you know whether this bakery is still closed?
redd (2025-06-21 19:09:20+00:00): Hi Mateusz,
I visited this place half a year ago. The bakery was still looking good but was closed. It was not clear If this closing is temporary or permanent.

I therefore made the opening_hours=closed. It dod not look disused or vacant. 

This kind of closening is happening very often nowadqys in Germany as the economy is getting more unstable. I assume bankrupcy or similar. It was impossible for me to survey any more information.

Greetings,

Redd
Andrea Musuruane (2025-01-09 12:00:28+00:00): Ciao. Il tag tracktype=4 è errato. Volevi  forse inserite tracktype=grade4?  Anche tracktype=grade3-5 non è corretto. La strada deve essere spezzata e mappata con gli opportuni e specifici tag. Ciao, Andrea
Frans S (2025-01-02 12:02:50+00:00): Hello. Siem.
I noticed that you also tag highways in the middle of rough terrain as residential. A specific reason ?
I changed them into Unclassified. (Not found  on this changeset)
Please take also a closer look to find residential areas and traces of highways.
Best regards
Langlaeufer (2025-01-13 08:11:51+00:00): Danke für die Korrektur der Geschwindigkeit. Da bei Verkehrsberuhigten Zonen aber Schrittgeschwindigkeit gilt und dies ein offener Rechtsbegriff ist bitte keinen expliziten Zahlenwert setzen. maxspeed wird aus living_street abgleitet. Die 7 km/h sind nur ein Richtwert der aus der häufigen Rechtsprechung abgeleitet werden kann. Es gibt aber auch Urteile mit 5, 10 oder gar 15 km/h
Aleks-Berlin (2025-01-03 13:49:31+00:00): Hallo N_Michel,
bitte tagge wikipedia=de:Abcd (nicht https...), siehe hier:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:wikipedia#Bevorzugtes_Tagging
Danke, Alex
N_Michel (2025-01-03 22:10:11+00:00): Hallo Alex,
vielen Dank für Deinen Hinweis!
Anmerkung:  Ich erst seit kurzem in OSM aktiv, eigentlich noch ein richtiger Anfänger. 
Habe noch weitere meiner WikipediaTags entsprechend geändert! Vor dem Hochladen erschien auch entsprechender "Konflikt", den ich allerdings nicht verstanden und daher weggeklickt habe.  :-(
Ehrlich gesagt verstehe ich auch nicht, warum die URL nicht erlaubt ist. Die ist doch eingentlich eindeutig.
Danke und schönes Wochenende wünscht
Norbert
GorgorMith (2025-01-02 10:40:47+00:00): Siehe auch Note 3644847.
GorgorMith (2025-01-02 12:02:29+00:00): Siehe auch diese Diskussion über das Changeset: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/how-to-map-partly-abandoned-power-plant/123753
Kovoschiz (2025-01-03 10:51:36+00:00): 1. The roads are kept because the ingress and egress will be the same. I don't know if the bus terminal will be changed to sawtooth layout, but parallel stands seem likely for this small size of intermediate stops. 
2. The `addr:housenumber=` should be kept as they still exist, and would be reused somehow 
3. It's usually not a good idea to draw the exact layout of the construction site in the status you find now, as OSM is not about recording construction progress. There will only be one continuous site with 2 towers, the Low Block extending from Kwun Tong Rd to Fuk Ning Rd