piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2026-02-24 19:51:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13334236041 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Auto detailing shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-05 05:33:06+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179378929
(No visible changes after review)
silversurfer83 (2026-02-25 19:17:23+00:00): Gude :)

im Sinne von keep the history wäre es besser den node nicht zu löschen sondern entweder ein lifecycle prefix zu setzen oder statt shop=bicycle einfach shop=vacant zu setzen. Die nicht mehr benötigten Eigenschaften wie Öffnungszeiten, Website etc. können dann natürlich weg.

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179005923
Natfoot (2026-03-13 23:53:11+00:00): Looks good, thank you for the edit
Yog Sot (2026-02-25 01:05:27+00:00): 💀💀
NeisBot (2026-02-24 20:21:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13372672588 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Insurance agency"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-05 05:33:07+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179378931
(No visible changes after review)
Comino (2026-02-25 23:03:08+00:00): Hi,

In your edit you use the tag "payment:cryptocurrencies=yes".

The tag "payment:cryptocurrencies=*" was a payment tag proposal which was rejected by the OSM community. Use this tag only when cryptocurrencies are NOT accepted.
Source: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Cryptocurrencies_with_payment_tag and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:payment:*#Cryptocurrencies

Please REMOVE the payment:cryptocurrencies=yes !

Thank you.

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
BTC Map
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Comino
MappingMore (2026-02-25 06:25:18+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:179020264
m_fuhrmann (2026-02-24 20:32:51+00:00): Hier sind noch ein paar Symbole auf den Wegweisern. Muss ich mir noch mal anschauen.
aki007 (2026-02-24 20:56:59+00:00): first time I've really done anything with turn lanes. I'd appreciate if someone could have a look at my edit
NeisBot (2026-02-24 20:36:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13353818765 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Hardware store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-05 05:33:07+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179378932
(No visible changes after review)
CAM-Gerlach (2026-02-25 15:41:21+00:00): Just to note, changesets spanning massive bounding boxes aggregating changes from multiple very geographically separate areas  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179007344 are strongly discouraged on OSM, as they make browsing and reviewing them difficult or impossible with common tools, and also interfere with tools' ability to monitor changesets for a given area (e.g. OSMCha didn't show me it despite it making changes in Blacksburg due to the massive bbox). Its best to keep changesets as geographically-focused as practical, at most spanning a single town or small metropolitan area (e.g. your changeset here is about the largest I'd ever do, and only in very special circumstances like this where it is a handful of edits to a single object type unfortunately distributed around a single metropolitan area; normally I'd keep my changesets to a neighborhood or smaller).
Omnific (2026-02-25 01:53:14+00:00): What is this? There is no Wildcat Mountain Resort here. Can you provide a source?
Omnific (2026-02-25 19:27:41+00:00): Due to a lack of response and the fact that ski lifts that clearly make no sense are shown here (as well as my research online), I am forced to assume this is all fictitious and will revert all associated changesets. larsenvd, if you provide some context/source on this info, I will re-enable your edits.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-03-27 10:37:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180495414 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some fantasy mapping in USA
Rainero (2026-03-13 10:49:24+00:00): Revert mit changeset/179803322
(unzulässige Quelle)
NeisBot (2026-02-24 20:56:11+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your changesets and noticed that the cumulative count of your recent edits (4 changesets) shows that 400 of your last 405 changes were deletions. This is quite an unusual proportion, so I wanted to check with you.

Could you please confirm whether these deletions were intentional or if they may have occurred by mistake?

#DeletionsCheck #Cumulative
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?uid=23866570
Pedro_10 (2026-02-24 21:06:05+00:00): I'm correcting a mistake. There was a bug on my PC in JOSM and I've been copying many buildings that don't exist. I wanted to agree.
MappingMore (2026-02-25 13:12:43+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:179036665
Udarian (2026-02-24 21:22:20+00:00): forgot to add road name at the end there, the end of the changeset comment was intended to be "at i95 and SR 860 Miami Gardens Drive."
TrickyFoxy (2026-03-04 10:13:55+00:00): Что вы имели в виду? Что гастронома больше нет?
NeisBot (2026-02-24 21:09:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13418242580 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Insurance agency"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-05 05:33:08+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179378933
(No visible changes after review)
ramthelinefeed (2026-03-11 09:14:22+00:00): Hi, it looks like this changeset might have invalidated the bus routes that are tagged along the Northway (the Geofabrik OSM Inspector tool has started complaining) - could you check?
flex16 (2026-02-24 21:31:42+00:00): Wenn nur Radfahrer frei ist, besteht keine Benutzungspflicht für Radfahrer. Die dürfen dann zwischen Fahrbahn und path wählen. Deshalb sollte "bicycle=use_sidepath" dann nicht getagged werden. Das sagt ja aus: "Immer wenns geht sidepath nutzen".
m_fuhrmann (2026-02-24 21:37:49+00:00): Ok. Ich ändere das wieder ab. War nicht viel. Allerdings erst morgen. War ein langer Tag 😬
flex16 (2026-02-24 21:43:04+00:00): Ja alles klar. Ich war auch nochmal so frei und habe paar Kleinigkeiten korrigiert in dem Bereich, auch das use_sidepath....
NeisBot (2026-02-24 21:12:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13596382774 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "The Barry Building"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-05 05:33:10+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179378936
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
m_fuhrmann (2026-02-24 21:21:29+00:00): Nun ist keine mehr am Objekt. War die Adresse denn falsch?
MHD (2026-02-25 19:46:52+00:00): Nein, nur doppelt die Adresse am Gebäude reicht.
NeisBot (2026-02-24 21:27:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13388978631 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Pet grooming salon"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-05 05:33:10+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179378937
(No visible changes after review)
NeisBot (2026-02-24 21:27:48+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13596524269 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "guest house rooms"
---
Например, более нейтральная и фактическая версия вашего текста могла бы быть: "номера гостевого дома"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-05 05:33:11+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179378938
(No visible changes after review)
lololailo (2026-02-25 08:04:34+00:00): Hola bienvenido a osm, no entiendo muy bien lo que has querido hacer pero parece una prueba quizás. En cuanquier caso no tiene sentido y lo voy a revertir. Te aconsejo que te inicies por cosas sencillas como añadir POI's y con alguna guía de ayuda https://learnosm.org/en/. Un saludo. Lorenzo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179009128
NeisBot (2026-02-24 21:33:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13474309686 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Floral shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-05 05:33:11+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179378939
(No visible changes after review)
NeisBot (2026-02-24 21:39:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 11 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/8157886 v24 | 6 crossings
https://osm.org/way/110860276 v5 | 5 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179009298
NeisReview (2026-03-05 05:33:19+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/179037475
eggie (2026-02-25 06:55:08+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  .. Je bedoeling was vast goed, maar dit is wat je hebt gedaan. 
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=179009378

Je hebt een aantal ways weggetrokken. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-02-25 06:58:28+00:00): reverted by changeset #179021300
eggie (2026-02-25 07:00:53+00:00): Volgens het Kadaster/BGT is deze straat toch echt de Gorhaak. 
Ga na bij het Kadaster hoe het zit en doe evt een terugmelding.via deze site..
https://www.verbeterdekaart.nl/#?geometry.x=145961.44&geometry.y=475853.35&zoomlevel=13.97

Is er een straatnaambord? 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-02-25 07:07:56+00:00): Doe je zelf een terugmelding dat de straatnaam niet klopt?
marhof81 (2026-02-25 08:04:50+00:00): Hai, 
Beetje veel berichten. Geen idee wat je bedoelt met “ways weggetrokken”?  
Ik heb alleen een straatnaam aangepast. De Gorhaak bestaat niet, die straat heet Oosthout en zo staat het ook op het straatnaambord - op de kaart heeft de staat nu 2 namen, dat klopt niet. Ik woon daar om  de hoek. Kijk maar wat je ermee doet.  Bedankt
eggie (2026-02-25 08:12:26+00:00): Dag Marhof,
Ways zijn lijnen. Bv heggen, straten. Wanneer je schuift met de kaart verplaats je soms ongemerkt punten met alles wat er aan vastzit.
Het Kadaster hanteert de verkeerde naam. OSM vrijwilligers vertrouwen op die data en veranderen je verbetering weer terug. Doe daarom een terugmelding dat Gorhaak niet bestaat.
Ik valideer alleen maar dus als je een terugmelding wilt doen via Verbeter de Kaart  gaarne. Zie link boven.
Het staat nu goed in OSM, maar voor hoelang?
Mvg
eggie
marhof81 (2026-02-25 08:20:34+00:00): Ok zal ik doen. Google Maps etc hebben het wel goed overigens
eggie (2026-02-25 08:39:40+00:00): Je krijgt altijd antwoord van het Kadaster en/of de Gemeente. Vandaar dat je het beter zelf kunt doen.
Het zou zelfs kunnen dat hier een verkeerd straatnaambord is opgehangen.
Succes,
eggie
Allroads (2026-05-14 15:43:53+00:00): Hoi, deze is ingetekend midden op de rijbaan, maar waar hangt hij, aan welke paal.

https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/13596582293

Nu zie ik hier wat hangen welke bedoel je?
https://api.panoramax.xyz/en/index?focus=pic&map=19.1/52.376331/4.903041&pic=b1b93bc9-e7f1-45f2-b123-5a0b1bdef336&seq=3ace26a0-182d-40d7-8098-eb83fe6b47c5&speed=250&theme=type&users=default&xyz=125.38/0.60/49

Die bij de voetgangersverkeerslicht lijkt een sensor te zijn voor het oversteken.

Bedoel je die bij het fietsverkeerslicht?
Daar heb ik hem nu neergezet.
Groeten Allroads
NeisBot (2026-02-24 21:51:22+00:00): Hi zjustin28, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 99% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 17 highway(s)
- 1 name(s)
- 1 surface(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179009659
zjustin28 (2026-02-24 22:31:48+00:00): Intentional for removal of unsanctioned trails.
Glassman (2026-02-24 23:06:00+00:00): In OSM, unsanctioned trails are tagged as informal, informal=yes. Additionally, If the trails have posted signs such as no trespassing they can also be tagged as access=private. I'm going to revert this changeset since it does not comply with our wiki. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpath and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access.

Basically if the path exists it can be added to OSM.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179009659
Frans S (2026-03-05 11:29:12+00:00): Hallo Koos.
Naast de wegen die gemapt moeten worden, map je ook residential areas. ( Ik doe dat ook omdat dat aangeeft dat er settlements, huizen etc aanwezig zijn). Het is gebruikelijk om settlements < 4 gebouwen niet als een residential area te mappen. Maar als een 'dwelling; of 'farm
Ik pas ze aan als ik ze tegen kom.
Vriendelijke groeten
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2026-02-25 15:06:29+00:00): Are you sure this section is no longer a public road?

Or is it temporary?

And please give meaningful changest comments and provide the street-level imagery so we can see where this come from.
oscarm_lyft (2026-02-25 23:09:39+00:00): Hi, ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy!

My name is Oscar Medinilla, and I'm a mapper in the OSM team at Lyft. I appreciate your message and bringing this to my attention.

I have used Lyft-owned street-level imagery highlighted below as evidence to add the motor_vehicle=private tag to road w169851110:
- 45.453284113666186, -73.74502748250961 Date: 2026-01-16 (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1CqYGQTgN5C1I0lr3aJs0uvS19Ui-75T7/view?usp=sharing)
- 45.45365971570624, -73.74480921775103 Date: 2025-12-14 (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1XmQIeaCya3l1DzvoywdqcbmZpWrwSW0s/view?usp=sharing)

Additionally, I used Lyft-owned telemetry, which does not show active passes on this road during the last two weeks (green color indicates the southeast direction) (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1fyztoNzuPBVFO3cz2G_6u9ELCq5eyyAH/view?usp=sharing).

However, I've reviewed the street-level imagery again to build a logical sequence. While the original edit only covered part of the road, the signage at 45.45436, -73.7454 clearly impacts the merging link and the subsequent ways:
Date: 2026-01-25 (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1r3gN3cpNA381iTB3YY_GSCBqy5xIJb-6/view?usp=sharing)

Since imagery from late 2025 through January 2026 and telemetry activity confirm these signs are actual, I plan to add the restriction to the entire impacted area for map accuracy. If you have any concerns regarding this or more up-to-date evidence, please share it with me

Best regards, 
Oscar Medinilla
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2026-02-25 23:24:59+00:00): Ok, that's fine, but please add a construction area around the zone so we know it may change in the near future.
oscarm_lyft (2026-02-26 22:29:17+00:00): Following the OSM Wiki guidelines (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dconstruction), we add any kind of construction tags only where we have confirmation from official sources that construction or repair works will be ongoing for more than 1 month. In this case, we didn't find any confirmation of that, so we will proceed with the edits mentioned in our previous response and add motor_vehicle=private to the missing segments based on the Lyft street level images. However, if you have any additional information about construction or believe that construction tags will be necessary in this case, you can add them on your own.

Best regards, 
Oscar Medinilla
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2026-02-26 22:36:52+00:00): Sorry, I meant adding an area with landuse=construction around the zone so we do not forget to validate this later on.
oscarm_lyft (2026-02-27 01:33:10+00:00): Unfortunately as for now these images that I shared are the only evidence that I have regarding possible construction, so I can hardly identify the geometry, extension and nature of it.

Best regards, 
Oscar Medinilla
❤️‍🔥 (2026-04-03 04:01:50+00:00): hi, could you please share your source for this edit? as far as i'm aware, construction will not start for another 20 years
CurlingMan13 (2026-05-20 22:33:21+00:00): What's your source for "future preserve"

Is there an actual name?  "future preserve" is certainly a description or note, not a name
George S (2026-05-21 22:15:52+00:00): Lake George Land conservancy recently purchased the property. It is currently not open to the public.

https://lglc.org/lake-george-land-conservancy-protects-160-acres-near-huletts-landing/
b-holdet (2026-02-25 07:06:57+00:00): Hvorfor nedklassificerer du https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/358622554

Ifølge wiki'en, så er highway=unclassfied ikke en del af bybilledet.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Da:Tag:highway=unclassified?uselang=da
bartgron (2026-02-25 18:10:43+00:00): To że droga jest prywatna nie oznacza że ma jej nie być na mapie. Mapujemy rzeczywistość i jeśli coś istnieje w rzeczywistości, znajduje się również na mapie. Przywróciłem tą drogę, dodałem tag access=private (który oznacza że droga jest prywatna) oraz dodałem bramę.
Pozdrawiam
pedr0faria (2026-02-24 22:46:02+00:00): Error corrected. I've already removed the cluster of buildings. Sorry.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179010701
NeisBot (2026-02-24 22:30:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13596545052 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Home boutique"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-05 05:33:13+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179378942
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
pwbriggs (2026-02-25 19:25:04+00:00): Looks good, thank you! One minor note is that, since many buildings are rectangular or composed of rectangular elements, it's often considered standard practice to rectangularize a building after tracing or adjusting it. In iD, the web-based editor you used, you can do this by right-clicking the selected object and selecting "Square," or by selecting the area and pressing Q.

But that's a totally minor thing. Thank you for keeping OpenStreetMap data up-to-date, we always love to have more contributors :) If you have any questions please feel free to reach out here, or I've found the OSM US Slack to be a very helpful resource as well: https://slack.openstreetmap.us/

Thanks again for your contributions and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
stoosm (2026-02-25 23:22:51+00:00): Thank you for the tips!
NeisBot (2026-02-24 22:45:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13300422914 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Restaurant"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-05 05:33:13+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179378943
(No visible changes after review)