piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
impiaaa (2023-02-06 18:22:50+00:00): Please use the changeset message to describe what you changed and why. For example, "Change construction_year tag to the documented tag year_of_construction". There are more examples here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Traduzione automatica: Si prega di utilizzare il messaggio del changeset per descrivere cosa è stato modificato e perché. Ad esempio, "Modifica il tag construction_year nel tag documentato year_of_construction". Ci sono altri esempi qui: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Good_changeset_comments
foreigner037 (2023-02-06 19:27:22+00:00): And also please refrain from making edits on such a large area.
Daniellisa2 (2023-02-08 14:38:57+00:00): I want to modify this role column before I send the changeset to the Repo. defmodule App.AccountUser do. schema "account_users" do.
https://bestgadgetshelp.com/10-best-epson-sticker-printers-2022/
WoodWoseWulf (2023-02-26 22:46:37+00:00): Hello,

I have changed the tagging on Erie County Community College from amenity=school to amenity=college.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dschool

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcollege
SekeRob (2023-02-09 08:23:54+00:00): Hi,

I've made a bunch of inner/outer role and multipolygon outline corrections in the region in the last few days with you listed as the last editor, this morning another 3 MP areas. Please study for your future endeavours allowing prevention prior to these being flagged on OSM Inspector

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=1.81492&lat=44.59267&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.65&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

happy mapping.
Mammi71 (2023-02-06 21:51:34+00:00): This is not a roundabout!
In Germany, only intersections signposted with traffic sign no. 215 are considered roundabouts. Everything else, depending on the situation, are circular intersections, turning loops, turning circles or simply traffic calming measures. 
Different traffic rules apply! In real roundabouts, traffic in the circle has the right of way! In circular intersections, those coming from the right have the right of way, i.e. those who want to enter the circle. 
Please stop your mapping activities concerning roundabouts immediately and inform yourself about the applicable traffic rules in Germany. Your incorrect roundabouts may lead to incorrect announcements by the router and possibly to dangerous situations in traffic.

Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)
user_14591104 (2023-02-10 08:50:25+00:00): Hello  Mammi71,
Thank you for reviewing my changeset and highlighting the issue. Apologies for the incorrect edit it’s an honest mistake from my end, the correction is already done by Langlaeufer. Going forward I’ll ensure not to repeat such mistakes. Thank you for highlighting the issue, looking forward to learn more.
Regards,
nagalvad
CurlingMan13 (2023-03-17 20:55:45+00:00): Use "q" to square the buildings...
Frans S (2023-02-07 14:41:59+00:00): Hello. Anthaas. 
You mapped her many tracks leading into farm fields which are, in my opinion, only of interest to locals, and they don't use our maps. They have no through destination. I shouldn't map these.
Anyhow, it is up to you
Best regards
bxl-forever (2023-02-07 16:33:59+00:00): Hello,

When passing by, I didn’t see a "rack" for 15 bicycles here.

There are 4 U-stands, i.e. capacity=8 and it is already on the map.

Was this a test edit?
clay_c (2023-05-28 19:29:07+00:00): Were you a bit overzealous here? Movements between K-96 and 127th Street East are not tolled.
jleedev (2023-05-28 20:35:20+00:00): I think you're referring to this region? https://files.slack.com/files-pri/T029HV94T-F059V35MUBD/image.png?pub_secret=a2a558144f

Yeah that makes sense. In my defense, the map was already wrong, I was just filling in the gaps.
clay_c (2023-05-28 22:11:39+00:00): Yeah, that's what I meant. I went ahead and fixed it: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136673568
vasony (2023-02-14 14:33:47+00:00): Szia!

A Esztergom, Töltés utca 3-at lebontották, vagy miért kerültek törlésre a házszámok?

Tamás
Villy (2023-02-14 15:21:55+00:00): Rég lebontottak, de nem is volt igaz, ami oda volt írva.
Villy (2023-02-14 15:22:56+00:00): Sajnos Egom hazszamozasa nagy százalékban egyszerűen nem igaz, amit ide feltöltenek.
vasony (2023-02-14 19:36:15+00:00): Köszi. Akkor jelezni kell a hibát a felvivőnek, mert így nem fog kiderülni ha valahol rossz a térkép és javítani kell
Villy (2023-02-14 20:12:50+00:00): Szia!

Foglamam sincs ki a szerkesztő, meg hogy miként kell visszanézni, de sajnos minden nagyobb  fának van POI-val felvett address-e, olyan telek, ami egy HRSZ 50 éve fel vannak véve házszámok, amik nem léteznek, minden épület, ami egy házszám felvesz valaki egy POI-t, amibe beleír egy házszámot, de minek... Évekkel ezelőtt a Fb-csoportban írtam erről, de azóta is ez megy, én meg nem fogok vitázni senkivel.
emersonveenstra (2023-02-06 18:31:54+00:00): changeset was supposed to be 125275293
Yunkers (2023-02-07 15:23:49+00:00): Hej, co tak właściwie chciałeś oznaczyć zmieniejąc Lipnicką na "Drogę główną"? To kategoria oznaczająca drogą ekspresową, więc na pewno nie była tam poprawna.
NorthCrab (2023-02-09 06:03:19+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1138431512
Proszę połącz nowo narysowane chodniki z drogami. Nie ignoruj takich błędów edytora. Pozdrawiam!
NorthCrab (2023-02-09 06:03:37+00:00): Takie chodniki bez połączeń są w dużym stopniu bezużyteczne dla nawigacji.
marczoutendijk (2023-02-06 18:58:07+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6843
charl3s (2024-12-25 16:56:36+00:00): dlaczego zmieniłęś z highway=service na track?
To poważny błąd, ponieważ droga prowadzi do zabudowań, a wiele nawigacji nie uwzglednia track. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/102143542/history
Dodko (2023-02-06 19:01:06+00:00): táto adresa
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10612319541
patrí sem
https://zbgis.skgeodesy.sk/mkzbgis/sk/kataster/detail/kataster/parcela-c/818313/702_10?pos=48.396973,17.749739,19
a ostatné okolo https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10612319544 tiež môžeš pridať do budovy
Tomas_J (2023-02-06 19:16:02+00:00): Ahoj, opravil som.
NorthCrab (2023-02-09 06:16:11+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10612321815

Tak nie oznaczamy sklepów Żabka.
https://img.monicz.dev/-EyhuNqGhsK
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132288831

Jak chcesz oznaczać drzwi to użyj odpowiedniego tagu (drzwi), POI powinno być wewnątrz obrysu.
NorthCrab (2023-02-09 06:17:01+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1138435174

A to nie jest sidewalk tylko podjazd
NorthCrab (2023-02-09 06:18:21+00:00): https://img.monicz.dev/-hfWb8Pspq4
Nie nakładaj na siebie dróg. Jeśli coś się zmieniło to zmodyfikuj element, albo chociaż go usuń. Takie coś jest błędem.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-06 19:00:28+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2232078176

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab (2023-02-07 04:40:25+00:00): Przywróciłem uszkodzone adresy, uważaj aby podczas innych edycji nie przenosić adresów. Jeśli Ci one przeszkadzają to ukryj je przy użyciu filtrów po prawej stronie. Pozdrawiam!
NorthCrab (2023-02-09 06:12:24+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1138437555
To nie jest sidewalk. Proszę zapoznaj się z tym tagiem https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:footway%3Dsidewalk
Harfeur (2023-02-06 21:13:11+00:00): Bonjour !

Pouvez-vous vérifier les noeuds https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8959162725 et https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/320914054 ?

Je pense qu'ils sont dupliqués et qu'il s'agit d'une unique station.

~Harfeur
TCL Relation Usagers (Transports en Commun Lyonnais) (2023-02-07 11:52:57+00:00): Bonjour,
Il s'agit effectivement d'une erreur.
Je viens de supprimer le nœud https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/320914054.
Merci pour votre vigilance.
Cordialement,
sannkc (2023-02-06 19:04:21+00:00): If there are observable physical characteristics that might make biking unsafe for some users, such as the surface material or surface smoothness, those can be tagged using the appropriate keys (surface=* and smoothness=*).
bxl-forever (2023-02-06 23:14:01+00:00): It does: the URL has changed but the place is still operating.
https://arkose.com/canal
Kristjan ESPERANTO (2023-02-06 23:18:15+00:00): Nice! I added it. Thanks!
NorthCrab (2023-02-09 06:04:06+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1138442660
Proszę staraj się nie przyłączać obszarów rzeczywistych (las) do symbolicznych (linia drogi). Takie coś bardzo trudno się potem edytuje.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-02-07 05:06:20+00:00): As per identical PMs just sent to both of you: 

1.  Please stop the edit wards immediately! Also please stop the endless arguments, and veiled threats, via your Changeset Comments.

2. Start a public discussion via either Talk US or US Slack to see the local communities opinion of how these paths should best be mapped.

3. Abide by that public decision!

Graeme Fitzpatrick,
OSMF Data Working Group
Cebderby (2023-02-07 23:05:20+00:00): Deliberately saved fiction and flawed cleanup reverted.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-06 19:30:21+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o miejscowości.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1138448107

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Langlaeufer (2024-11-04 15:10:54+00:00): Was wolltest du mit dem geradeausfahrverbot auf dem Parkplatz ausdrücken? Entgegen der Einbahnstraßenrichtung ist das so überflüssig. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15442274#map=19/52.602123/13.351759
Cebderby (2023-02-07 23:06:36+00:00): Badly tagged, and change does not correspond with changeset description - reverted
CurlingMan13 (2023-03-17 20:52:14+00:00): Do not create a nest and mess of cartpaths to try and create an "area" for your golf game.  Only map what is on the ground, and ensure correct tags are used.
jcr83 (2023-02-06 20:52:57+00:00): Piétons et vélos sont autorisés par défaut sur les pistes, il n'est donc pas utile d'ajouter foot=yes et bicycle=yes.
merylstreet (2023-02-07 09:01:16+00:00): Bonjour jcr83,

Merci pour votre explication, je n'étais pas au courant en effet !
Je les ai rajoutés car Organic Maps ne voulait pas me faire prendre ce chemin à vélo, je pensais que le problème venait d'un manque de tag sur OSM mais peut être que le problème vient de Organic Maps même ? En savez vous plus par hasard ?

En parallèle je vais supprimer mes 2 édits.
divulmappeur (2023-02-07 20:58:34+00:00): J'ai modifié les tags access du portail https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10113897285 à voir si ça résout le problème...
OSM_RogerWilco (2023-02-06 20:19:50+00:00): Moin HenneB,

herzlich willkommen bei OSM! :-)

An einen Feld/Waldweg (highway=track) muss man nicht expliziert foot/bicylce=yes taggen, weil das impliziert wird. Sprich, das ist standardmäßig schon so. Das trifft eigentlich auf fast alle Straßentypen zu. Bei Autobahnen sind zu Fuß Gehende und Radfahrende nicht erlaubt und dass muss auch nicht extra erfasst werden.

Als Grundsatz kann man eigentlich sagen, dass wir nur Verkehrszeichen extra eintragen. Hilfreich ist dabei auch das "Verkehrszeichen Tool": osmtools.de/traffic_signs/

Viele Grüße
Roger Wilco

P.S.: Änderst Du das wieder zurück?
OSM_RogerWilco (2023-02-06 21:32:32+00:00): Ich habe gerade gesehen, was wohl der Grund für Deine Änderung war: An den Feldwegen wurde access=agricultural getaggt. Das ist falsch und sperrt für alle außer Landwirtschaft den Weg.

access=agricultural kann dann auch gelöscht werden. Wenn Da ein Verkehrszeichen 260 + "landwirtschaftlicher Verkehr frei", dann wäre motor_vehicle=agricultural richtig. Steht da allerdings ein Zeichen 250 +"landwirtschaftlicher Verkehr frei" , dann vehicle=agricultural. Dann dürfen Radfahrende dort aber auch nicht lang.

Die Frage wäre also: Steht da ein Schild? Und wenn ja, welches?
HenneB (2023-02-08 13:39:47+00:00): Hallo
OSM_RogerWilco, da steht jeweils Verbot für Kraftfahrzeuge, Landwirtschaftl. Verkeht frei.
Somit sollte das stimmen, richtig, ich bin neu hier und übe noch, mich stört, dass ich da nicht lang routen kann obwohl ich es darf!
Viele Grüße
Jens
OSM_RogerWilco (2023-02-08 14:46:36+00:00): Danke für die Rückmeldung.

Also so? http://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/?signs=260,1026-36

Dann stimmt das aktuelle Tagging nicht. Richtig wäre dann motor_vehicle=agricultural statt access=agricultural. Dann braucht es auch kein foot/bicycle=yes
Bruce129! (2023-02-06 20:51:37+00:00): Please add Bighorn Road to your mapping system. I made this addition last October.
Something B (2023-02-06 22:49:01+00:00): Hi, Bruce! 
I just fixed the tags. :-)
Regards, Something B.
Bruce129! (2023-02-09 02:37:23+00:00): I do not see Bighorn Road on this map
olo81 (2023-04-24 18:31:18+00:00): nazwy opisowe do poprawy https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Nazwy
eteb3 (2026-07-21 18:36:22+00:00): Hi Robert,

It seems you may well have walked the bridge which is noted as closed here:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2835897

Do you recall if you did, and if it's' therefore open again?

Thanks

Edward
Robert Whittaker (2026-07-23 20:31:57+00:00): Yes, so I've closed the note.
Harfeur (2023-02-07 21:11:33+00:00): C'est également le cas d'après le cadastre ;)
UNGSC-DTLM-Ale_Zena (2024-01-09 09:16:51+00:00): Hello,
in this changeset I noticed you added some duplicated place names (e.g.: Kasambya B, Ntunga, Minana, Butohyo, Butera), and this wrong name: "-1726799 Buhuhira GNS PPL no population estimate available, defaulted to village populated place village".
Before import data is always reccomended to check and clean these data, otherwise bada data remain on OSM database for years decreasing the quality of this, very valuable, database.

Cheers,
  Alessandro
Violaine_Do (2024-10-01 00:43:54+00:00): bonjour, osm est un bien commun utilisé dans de nombreuses applications, merci de ne mettre que l'existant...
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132174596
DD1GJ (2023-02-07 08:48:27+00:00): Verschiebung rückgängig gemacht, da sich die Praxis innerhalb des Gebäudes befindet. OpenStreetMap ist eine Geodatenbank und der Ersteller des jeweiligen Kartenstils entscheidet, ob etwas dargestellt wird oder nicht. In der allgemeinen Karte werden derzeit grundsätzlich keine Therapeuten dargestellt, sondern aus dem Gesundheitssektor nur Ärzte und Zahnärzte sowie Apotheken.
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2023-02-07 19:02:57+00:00): Der er ingen grund til at sætte area=yes på den  vej, som er en inner i en multipolygon.
Leif Lodahl (2023-02-08 17:32:11+00:00): Jeg forstår ikke helt hvad du mener, men er meget interesseret i at blive bedre til at lave relationer.
Relationen er skov
Outer er Område
Inner er henholdsvis Vand og Eng.

Hvilken inner tænker du på?

(Tak for konstruktiv kritik)
AsgerFrank (2023-02-09 14:07:03+00:00): Leif, HVIS der skulle have været et tag area=yes på relationen, så skulle det have været på multipolygonen (dvs. på relationen, ikke en af de 3 ways den består af) ligesom selve skovens andre tags, således at den way der er outer er helt tag-tom. 

Når man laver en multipolygon ud fra en i forvejen eksisterende simpel struktur som fx en skov, så starter man med at flytte alle tags fra denne kommende outer-way over på selve relationen, multipolygonen.
De strukturer man derefter indplacerer som huller i skovosten, som inner(e), beholder derimod sine vanlige tags.

Men area skal slet ikke bruges, for det er underforstået i multipolygonen, det ser jeg også ud af elementdefinitionerne https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Elements#Relation
 samt  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Area#Tags_implying_area_status

Niels, du må have ment det er OUTER'en, der ikke skal have area på, også.
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2023-02-09 14:53:16+00:00): Ja, der er outer, jeg mente.

Der skal heller ikke være area=på inners, men det er der heller ikke på de to her.
Leif Lodahl (2023-02-09 17:36:10+00:00): Tak for input.
Dodko (2023-02-07 07:09:53+00:00): Ak je už adresa v budove
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/82412189
netreba ju nechať aj v POI ktoré je nad budovou (tam je neúplná adresa bez addr:conscriptionnumber a addr:streetnumber)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9133538315
Aplikácie si adresu preberú z budovy.
Dodko (2023-02-07 07:12:30+00:00): Rovnaké príklady aj tu
budova https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/82411267
a nové POI s duplicitnou a neúplnou adresou
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10612649312
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10612649313
iandees (2023-02-06 21:05:01+00:00): Hi! Thanks for updating your entry. You changed the address information correctly, but the location needs to get updated, too. I can move it to the right spot for you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132175577
muralito (2023-02-07 13:55:54+00:00): Hola. Estos elementos no tienen direccion alguna, por lo cual no llevan etiquetas addr:*. Y es un place=scare porque es relevante como lugar para la ciudad, y no esta ni cerca de ser un "park".
adrianojbr (2023-02-16 22:28:28+00:00): Olá, Juarez!

Em regra, nomes não devem ser abreviados, conforme https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Key:name#Abrevia%C3%A7%C3%A3o_(n%C3%A3o_faz%C3%AA-lo).

Abraço!
Martin Ldt (2023-03-12 08:17:41+00:00): Hi, 

Why have you removed all the rail= abandoned tag values? 

This is important information, 
some of these kv were removed all along the old 466A line

https://www.saive.be/saive_old/PDF/Le%20vicinal.pdf
https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ligne_de_tramway_466A_Li%C3%A8ge_-_Fouron-le-Comte#/media/Fichier:Buurtspoorwegen_Luik.png
StijnRR (2023-03-21 18:54:31+00:00): I did not remove all railway=abandoned tags. I kept them where there still is an abandoned railway track (often reused as track, path, ...). Where the trackbed has disappeared, using railway=abandoned is wrong.
Martin Ldt (2023-03-22 10:54:48+00:00): Hi,

I agree that "Mapping railways for historical purposes is discouraged when there is no physical evidence of the railway currently existing"  (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Dabandoned) 

Nevertheless, in this case "Rue Vielle Foulerie" clearly shows signs of the old infrastructures (slope, curvature radius, road banks (https://www.google.be/maps/@50.6638586,5.6829757,3a,75y,176.17h,74.58t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sXGqoSplxjjG4fwXtDcYP0w!2e0!7i16384!8i8192?hl=fr)

Best, 
Martin
StijnRR (2023-03-28 19:23:16+00:00): You're right. It's repaired.

Regards,

Stijn
eggie (2023-02-06 21:44:01+00:00): Dag Bert... Je vraagt feedback... Volgens mij is het helemaal gelukt.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=132176950
MVG
eggie
wkdgs (2023-02-09 08:57:35+00:00): Du musst zuerst die Straße auswählen und dann mit gedrückter Umschalttaste und der rechten Maustaste auf den Punkt klicken, an dem du die Straße teilen möchtest. Dann kannst du mit dem Scheren-Symbol die Straße teilen.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132177030
Kaffeesegler (2023-02-11 19:42:28+00:00): Danke, nun kapiert - musste erst Straße plus den Kreuzungspunkt selektieren, dann rechte Maustaste (und beim Mac control + rechte Maustaste.
Nun sollte es stimmen.
Man fährt da am besten nur per Rad durch ;-)
eggie (2023-02-06 21:45:42+00:00): Dag Lantander..
Je info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode..
MVG
eggie
martien-176 (2023-02-07 15:00:51+00:00): Hi, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. You requested a review of your mappings.

The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location.

Allow me to give some tips on improving your mappings:
- avoid mapping several buildings as one building. Every building must be traced separately. The humanitarian teams use the size of the buildings to estimate the number of people living there.
- avoid buildings sharing nodes or else overlapping, eg with roads
- pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon.

Please watch these 2 short video for more info:
-Buildings--> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o
-Roads--> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBLwb2nisJQ

Thanks so much for your contribution, Martien, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132177119
MxxCon (2023-02-07 07:18:35+00:00): Hello.
This location doesn't seem to be listed on their website. Is this still accurate?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132177184
perpetual nomad (2023-02-07 08:07:08+00:00): Hello, thanks for your comment. You are right. I am sorry I didn't check this properly. I'll delete the point
MxxCon (2023-02-07 08:10:41+00:00): I already moved it to what appears to be their Manhattan location
perpetual nomad (2023-02-07 08:16:44+00:00): I just saw that you moved the point, thank you.

Can I ask how you did it? Searching I found this but I don't know if it's the proper way (basically cut-paste in the new location).

https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/71424/how-to-change-the-location-of-an-object/74275
MxxCon (2023-02-07 08:25:58+00:00): Lots of manual slow zooming in and out and dragging the node along the whole way 😅
If you know the exact coordinates of the new location you can use Level0 editor since it gives you coordinates in text form and just paste/replace it there.
CurlingMan13 (2024-02-28 06:00:00+00:00): How did you verify that they accept BTC/XBT?
perpetual nomad (2024-02-28 08:22:39+00:00): I am one of the volunteers adding and updating points in btcmap.org , a map showing every business in the world accepting bitcoin.

Business (or their customers) can apply to be added to the map filling a survey. Volunteers contact the merchants via official email, social media or phone to verify that the information is correct before adding the point to OSM.

Customers can also ask to update information.
empty_child (2023-02-07 12:47:41+00:00): Hello Thunder Squirrel,
About https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10013529615, if it is a microfinance organization, it is better to use shop=money_lender (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dmoney_lender). Not critical, but more logical
Thunder Squirrel (2023-02-27 15:20:53+00:00): Oh, thanks! I've changed this in #133092097
NorthCrab (2023-02-07 14:47:55+00:00): Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Uważam że usunięcie sport=soccer z boiska było niepoprawne. Dodanie nazwy tutaj także jest zbędne ponieważ nie jest to nazwa własna. Poprawiłem oznaczenie tego boiska. Pozdrawiam!
NorthCrab (2023-02-07 14:49:44+00:00): Witam, twój opis zmian nie wyjaśnia dlaczego usunąłeś przystanek autobusowy. Dodatkowo, ten szlak jest już oznaczony: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1601078 więc jest to duplikat który usunąłem. Szlaki zazwyczaj oznaczamy jako relację a nie jak punkt z tourism attraction. Pozdrawiam!