piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Ewrt1 (2024-05-05 05:45:03+00:00): Banff is sorta near Canmore... but that's a bit too far. Thanks for saying Fas Gas instead of Fast Gas, but remember to append the word "Plus" to the end
emersonveenstra (2024-05-04 19:58:34+00:00): Hi there,

I've removed this beach as it doesn't fit the requirements of a beach, namely that it is near a mapped body of water. From the aerial imagery, it looks like it may be a lake? but it's hard to tell exactly
Filip009 (2024-05-08 05:10:34+00:00): Hello, please do not put reference number into name. There is a special tag "ref" for it.

Zdravím, prosím nedávajte do mena aj referenčné číslo. Máme na to špeciálny tag "ref".
NandaraRitsu (2024-05-09 08:21:42+00:00): OK, dakujem za info aj opravu.
Martin
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-31 12:32:23+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11879615616/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)

is it tourism information office?

If yes then tourism=information + information=office would be likely abetter tagging, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:information%3Doffice
otji73 (2024-05-09 21:35:27+00:00): there is no road
NieWnen (2024-05-04 22:55:21+00:00): Proszę, nie dodawaj fikcyjnych chodników, to niczemu nie służy. Tym bardziej fikcyjnych brodów.
Glassman (2024-05-06 17:58:23+00:00): #TIP: draw buildings by outlining the roof line. Then square the feature by selecting the outline then type a "q" - they will look more professional.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150896218
Glassman (2024-05-06 18:07:51+00:00): I ended up removing a number of your poorly drawn bldgs. This one I fixed up. It looks like you were given a class assignment. You and others were all adding building on top of one another in the same area. Please ask your instructor to give you different areas to work in. If the instructor needs help, please have them contact me.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150896218
Glassman (2024-05-06 17:48:05+00:00): I'm not sure what you are trying to tag here. The area is already in a landuse=residential area. Is this a new construction area? if so it can be tagged as such. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dconstruction for help in tagging construction.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150896406
Glassman (2024-05-06 18:09:23+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150896408
Glassman (2024-05-06 18:09:58+00:00): Please draw building to their roof lines. Then square the building by selecting the outline then just type a "q"
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150896408
ooosssay (2024-05-04 20:07:44+00:00): Actually was just adding shops and the source is being local.
Glassman (2024-05-06 18:10:24+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150896469
Glassman (2024-05-06 18:18:19+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150896514
eteb3 (2024-10-22 13:32:42+00:00): Thanks for adding Dunmore Head. Think you also added Brow Head?
Malin Head is in the map too.
If you know better than me where to put Burr Point on the east coast, that would be great :-)
AndrewMcCarthy (2024-10-22 14:50:38+00:00): I didn't add Brow Head, no, I just added the Wikidata reference.

I've just added Burr Point in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158215262
eteb3 (2024-10-22 14:52:48+00:00): Full house! Thank you :)
Glassman (2024-05-06 18:11:28+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150897143
Glassman (2024-05-06 18:11:55+00:00): Oreilly is an auto parts store not a car repair shop.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150897143
Glassman (2024-05-06 18:22:02+00:00): Please save an upload your edits before moving to another location
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150897372
alexwohlbruck (2024-05-13 20:54:02+00:00): Please be sure to add "amenity=bicycle_parking" tag to any bike racks you add to the map. This is important metadata to surface in apps which consume this information
awmorrison (2024-05-13 22:33:35+00:00): Thanks, will do!
awmorrison (2024-05-14 02:06:52+00:00): I noticed some of your edits combined multiple bicycle parking nodes into one. Is there some advantage to configuring them that way for these apps, even if it's less precise in indicating the location of the parking racks? Also, what apps consume the bicycle parking info?
alexwohlbruck (2024-06-04 02:52:37+00:00): I have actually made an app for that!
https://rackfinder.app

It is better to group up racks that are close together that you might consider a "clump". This will reduce clutter on the map and is easier for data queries. Then use the capacity tag to specify how many bikes can fit there. I usually mark the center of the row of stands for the node marker. You can however use an "area" way to draw the boundary of the bike parking area. Only a few are tagged this way but it is valid.
VictorIE (2026-03-23 09:42:49+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11065752534/

The lines and cables here (and possibly some other points) seem to change voltage at power=terminal instead of power=transformer
PluMGMK (2026-03-23 22:21:41+00:00): Hello!

Here (and at most of these "house" substations), the transformers are configured with the secondary (10-kV) bay running directly underneath the primary (38-kV) one, so I map as a single dual-circuit (and dual-voltage) bay to capture it succinctly.

I guess it doesn't fully reflect reality though, because the 10-kV line transitions underground at the wall, whereas the 38-kV line goes indoors via the aforementioned overground terminal. That's why it ends up splitting into a `power=cable` and `power=minor_line` with two different voltages at that point.
Glassman (2024-05-06 18:22:58+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150897603
Glassman (2024-05-06 18:24:00+00:00): Please draw building to match the roof line. Then square the building by selecting the outline and typing a "q". They will look professionally done.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150897603
SomeoneElse (2026-01-10 11:55:34+00:00): Buses indicated as stopped here now stop from ED instead from 20:30 in the evening.
SomeoneElse (2026-01-12 20:53:50+00:00): Except just now a bus has picked up at 2050 from EB.
Maybe stand in the middle and be prepared to run left or right?
Glassman (2024-05-06 18:17:31+00:00): Buildings will look more professional if you square them. To square select the outline then just type a "q". Can you square the buildings you added?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150897701
ivanbranco (2025-06-14 07:33:55+00:00): Hi pawpwala,

I'm guess this is supposed to be circumference=3?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11879762449/history

thanks and good mapping
DaveF (2024-05-05 08:20:29+00:00): Could you provide details of the railway building being under construction? I can find no record of it.
kartler175 (2024-05-06 14:36:11+00:00): please check https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-62.55646&lat=44.85302&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.95&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways
Dartmouthmapmaker (2024-05-07 10:43:09+00:00): Already fixed it
Glassman (2024-05-06 18:30:07+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150898882
Glassman (2024-05-06 18:30:45+00:00): I removed the poorly drawn buildings. None were close to the roof line and many included more than one building.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150898882
archpdx (2024-05-04 22:06:03+00:00): amenity=hospital should only be used for hospital grounds, I would use building=hospital for the buildings
silversurfer83 (2024-05-05 08:45:32+00:00): Moin Jonas :)

habe auch schon überlegt, da etwas zu ändern und hab es erstmal gelassen, weil ich nicht weiß, wie lange die Baustelle noch dauert.
Das Problem ist nämlich folgendes: Viele Dienste, die unsere Datenbank nutzen, ziehen sich vielleicht einmal pro Quartal ein Update. Wenn gerade in diesem Update die Straße noch gesperrt ist, sie aber ein paar Tage später real und in der Datenbank wieder freigegeben ist, hat die Person mit dem frischen Update jetzt trotzdem noch locker 3 Monate die gesperrte Straße in seinem Navi.

Daher erfassen wir in unserer Datenbank kurzfristige Sperrungen (ca. bis 4 Wochen) praktisch gar nicht. Sperrungen ab ca. 6 Wochen (gibt es Diskussionen drüber) bis irgendwo 6 bis 9 Monate werden häufig, wenn sie denn erfasst werden, mit sogennanten conditional restrictions erfasst. Dienste, die damit umgehen können haben dann recht genau die Sperrung in ihren Daten und Dienste, die es nicht können, haben dann wenigstens keine unnötig lange Sperrung drin.

Mein Vorschlag: Rausfinden, wie lange die Baustelle hier noch dauern soll. Bis das bekannt ist, die Sperrung wieder rausnehmen. Wenn dann ein Zeitraum bekannt ist, mit conditional restrictions sperren.

Details:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Conditional_restrictions

cheers
silversurfer83
Jonas Sch (2024-05-05 18:40:44+00:00): Die ist halt schon ein bisschen und ich würde da mit dem Bus immer lang fahren, geht ja aber nicht, deswegen kann ich sofort sagen, wenn wieder offen ist.
silversurfer83 (2024-05-05 18:48:46+00:00): Schon klar 😄

Geht hier aber darum, dass hier nicht eine Sperrung, die vielleicht in 6 Wochen vorbei ist, noch bis Weihnachten in den meisten OSM-Navis drin ist.

Daher wäre es sehr hilfreich zu wissen, wie lange Hessen Mobil da noch schaffen will
Ray Mandes (2024-05-04 21:54:51+00:00): Appears large since I had to touch a railway node (15272544, v50)
user_8655426 (2024-05-07 09:33:41+00:00): こんにちは。OpenStreetMap (OSM) へようこそ。
OSM は現在、実際に存在する地物をマッピングするプロジェクトです。架空の地物を追加したり、既存のデータを実際とは異なるものに変更したりしないでください。よろしくお願いします。(事実と異なる不正な編集を行ったユーザーは、ブロックされる可能性があります。)

・「ようこそ！」
https://www.openstreetmap.org/welcome

・JA:破壊行為
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:破壊行為

・Beware of fake beaches (Pokémon Go) (偽のビーチに注意してください。ポケモン GO)
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/beware-of-fake-beaches-pokemon-go/112413

---

・JA:初心者ガイド
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:初心者ガイド

・learnOSM (ビギナーズガイド)
https://learnosm.org/ja/beginner/
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150899480
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-07 14:28:28+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151010854
Nakaner-repair (2024-05-04 22:06:29+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 150879753, 150879925.
Euxeinos (2024-08-07 22:15:42+00:00): Το Ωραιόκαστρο δεν είναι προάστιο της Π.Ε. Θεσσαλονίκης;
Britzz (2024-06-23 21:15:25+00:00): vous avez découpé le passage piéton https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/650674258 (il me semble) pour ajouter un footway=traffic_island alors que le rue est représentée par un seul way? Je pense qu'il est préférable de juste ajouter crossing:island=yes (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing:island)
fgouget (2024-06-26 08:16:42+00:00): Le problème avec crossing:island=yes c'est qu'il me semble qu'on ne peut pas indiquer s'il y a une surface pododactile et/ou une bordure de trottoir au niveau de l'îlot. Je pense que ces informations pourraient être utiles pour des personnes malvoyantes.
Britzz (2024-07-01 14:19:58+00:00): Je comprends le besoin mais si on veut ajouter un footway=traffic_island, il FAUT alors séparer les voies de la rue (highway=residental ou autre) dans les deux sens (ce qui me semble personnellement bien "trop" lourd)
signina (2024-05-07 19:34:24+00:00): I was wrong and there is a couloir up to Truein that can be passed by experienced hikers/climbers (SAC T4+). I have reverted and refined this in changeset 151026070.
just_another_mapper (2024-08-20 08:07:18+00:00): Hey @HABmaps, just wondering what the intent was of this changeset? Was it to indicate that walking/bringing bicycles onto the platform is allowed? As far as I know, cycling on the platforms is not permitted, which is what bicycle=yes indicates. Bicycle=no or bicycle=dismount may be better tags, see this discussion around the differences between them - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bicycle%3Ddismount. Generally bicycle=no implies pushing is allowed, but within the context of a station bicycle=dismount may be preferable to indicate that bikes are allowed within the station (which is what I assume was the original intent of this change).
HABmaps (2025-05-19 09:47:28+00:00): I checked out the thread you suggested, you're right, bicycle dismount is the right option.
DaveF (2024-05-05 10:07:42+00:00): Hi
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1279782238
You can't have tunnels & bridges.

layer is a rendering tag. the bridge has +1 value so the path doesn't require a layer tag.
4004 (2024-05-05 11:42:29+00:00): yep, my mistake, didn't realise the new sidewalk was missing layer and bridge tags
DaveF (2024-05-05 14:06:46+00:00): hgv designated?
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/4235262

https://maps.app.goo.gl/hk2ve3CWJmcVXDUY6
DaveF (2024-05-05 14:09:20+00:00): or destination even?
4004 (2024-05-05 14:15:42+00:00): I did tag it as destination, looking at deep history
mariotomo (2024-12-21 07:33:31+00:00): hi. I'm sorry to say, but I'm afraid that your contributions create a false sense of "mappedhood". I checked some of your hamlets and for most of them I found no corresponding group of buildings that can explain the placing of the node. 
maybe we simply cannot use the logic you used, and we should undo?
Alan_Owl (2024-12-22 21:30:38+00:00): Good Afternoon, to elaborate on the hamlet locations process, the hamlet locations are the center points that were derived from the "Populated Places Census 2010 GIS" shapefile (Link: https://stridata-si.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/e9b8ba21a21d4ac7be98bbff2c67d3f2_0/explore?location=9.013438%2C-79.779687%2C12.66). The features in the shapefile are polygon features. As a result, I used the "Feature to Point" tool in ArcGIS Pro to obtain a point location version of the hamlets, in which the tool determined the hamlet center points--based on the polygon feature boundaries. Within the tool, I specified that the resulting center point must be inside of the polygon feature. This was the method I used for the first few rounds of hamlet additions. Later on, I made slight modifications to the resulting points, based on aerial imagery within OSM and the shapefile feature boundaries within ArcGIS Pro. Overall, the hamlet information was based on the above-mentioned shapefile. Feel free to review the shapefile. If you feel that the location is incorrect, feel free to make modifications to the locations. Some things have popped up on my end, in which I placed my OSM effort on an hiatus.
mariotomo (2024-12-23 11:58:02+00:00): hi again and thanks for the explanation. IMO there's a hidden assumption in your reasoning, and that consists in assuming that (all of) the population of a "corregimiento" is concentrated at a hamlet. this might be (partially) so in countries with fairly high urban concentration (like neighbouring Colombia), it is very much **not** the case in Panama.
so it's not so that I "feel that the location is incorrect": I actually suspect that there isn't any hamlet for many of these polygons.
we should ask people who live in the area, or have visited it recently. I'll see what I can do about this last part.
Rick Morales (2024-12-25 23:46:29+00:00): Not being an expert, I looked at the aerial imagery, and the hamlet points are near but still a little off from the closest group off buildings, in almost all the cases. I think it's just a matter of dragging the hamlet points to where the buildings are and corroborating that the name on the map coincides with the name on the ground, in real life.
intschutschuna (2024-05-15 17:20:48+00:00): Hallo Atlas557, du hast hier railway=razed aber gleichzeitig auch railway=level_crossing eingetragen. Das passt von sich aus nicht zusammen, wenn noch Übergänge zu sehen wären, wäre die Strecke nicht razed.
Bitte beachte dazu auch folgenden Text: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:railway%3Drazed

Könntest du die railway=level_crossing wieder entfernen, auch wenn du dabei Warnungen o.ä. angezeigt bekommst?
mariotomo (2024-05-06 06:09:34+00:00): hi. thank you for taking care of the data for Panama in OSM. where did you get hold of the sources you used? have you been in contact with other mappers in the area? would you describe your workflow, possibly in a wiki page?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Panama
Alan_Owl (2024-05-07 23:47:40+00:00): Hello. You are welcome. I obtained the source data from the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute Physical Monitoring - GIS Laboratory (Link: https://stridata-si.opendata.arcgis.com/). Unfortunately, I haven’t been in contact with other mappers in the area. I will consider describing my workflow when I get more acquainted with OSM. I started using OSM a week ago.
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-11 12:03:01+00:00): Thank you for mapping. The mapping looks great and also the changeset comment. Happy Mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150902171
tekim (2024-05-05 21:46:05+00:00): As has previously been communicated, buildings should be tagged building=yes, or other appropriate building=* value.  Buildings are not themselves landuse.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150940217
tekim (2024-05-05 21:47:41+00:00): This does not appear to be a beach.  In the available imagery it is either covered in grass, mud, or under water.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150940256
tekim (2024-05-05 21:49:18+00:00): These do not appear to be beaches in the available imagery as there appears to be considerable vegitation.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150940295
Udarian (2024-05-05 02:29:36+00:00): question:
why did you delete all the buildings just to add them all again as new ways, as a general rule of thumb its best to edit existing ways as to preserve history on the ways. also why did you delete that foot path on the inside of the buildings, have they removed it because if they didn't it shouldn't have been removed.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150902559
Kev0 (2024-05-05 05:58:34+00:00): ah sorry I had no idea that that was a custom. is there any way to restore the history of the ways deleted?
i deleted the footpath because i wasn't sure if it really counted as one as there is a much larger courtyard that surrounds the footpath, a bad idea in retrospect and i should have asked about in irc
Udarian (2024-05-06 00:11:37+00:00): yes there is a way, ill do that tomorrow, as for the footpath it seems to be connected to other foot paths that are not mapped yet.
Kev0 (2024-05-07 20:32:26+00:00): thank you udarian!
Udarian (2024-05-08 00:13:20+00:00): this commit removed all the history from the buildings by deleting everything so I am reverting and fixing by hand

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151032667
muralito (2024-05-06 01:09:54+00:00): Hola. Las lineas de interpolacion "even" debieran tener numeros pares en sus nodos.
citrula (2024-05-05 04:16:59+00:00): Looks good to me, it matches up with TIGER 2022 data as well. Thanks for the contribution
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150902904
AminAlinezhad (2024-05-05 15:36:03+00:00): برج البرز کمال شهر
WoodWoseWulf (2024-05-05 07:37:08+00:00): Hello, this is not a beach. I have reverted this change.
Lejun (2025-01-06 10:46:24+00:00): Tu peux m’en dire davantage sur le `landfill:type:FR=ISDND` ? C’est quoi, ça vient d’où, c’est documenté comment, et y a quoi comme autre valeurs possibles ?
Olyon (2025-01-06 15:09:03+00:00): Non ce n'est pas documenté. C'est seulement pour garder l'info quelque part que ces décharges sont des ISDND (Installation de stockage de déchets non dangereux) et pas des ISDD (déchets dangereux) ou des ISDI (déchets inertes) voir des décharges sauvages.
l'info vient de la base SINOE de l'Ademe. et je n'avais pas trouvé mieux comme tag.
citrula (2024-05-05 04:18:19+00:00): Welcome to OSM, thanks for your contribution!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150903678
Glassman (2024-05-06 18:33:44+00:00): Please use a descriptive changeset comment. like "added street lamps and stop sign"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150904017
大山かなめ (2024-05-05 04:38:34+00:00): 書き忘れましたが、この編集もOsmoseのフラグを参考にしています
tastrax (2024-05-08 11:33:59+00:00): Hi folks - when adding addr:state its acceptable to use the abbreviated form such as QLD, NSW etc - all uppercase as per the Aussie wiki
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features#Addresses

The whole country has recently been updated to this format

Cheers
Joseph Crowell (2024-05-09 07:21:32+00:00): Right I'll go back and correct that then.

Cheers
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-05 18:04:26+00:00): Thanks for fixing!

And yes, fixing this kind of thing can be really painful :(

In my city it is relatively rare and fixing still takes a lot of effort
nevw (2024-05-05 06:11:36+00:00): Hi, welcome to the OpenStreetMap.
The osm is a map of the real world as it exists now and not a fantasy world.
I think you have added fake Pokémon Go mapping.
Are you able to remove your edits or should I revert them?
WoodWoseWulf (2024-05-05 07:48:32+00:00): This is 100% Pokemon GO mapping. A recent update made a certain kind of Pokemon appear exclusively at beaches.
The original mapper here needs to be aware that the map data in Pokemon GO is based on an old version of OSM and making bad edits like this will likely have no impact.
nevw (2024-05-06 03:40:59+00:00): Thanks WoodWoseWulf for restoring the osm