piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
burrscurr (2025-04-28 15:43:34+00:00): Based on your images, the middle one seemed to me like it could be reasonably considered a building. I'm not totally sure though. The middle shelter is also probably the most useful when creating a 3D model due to its characteristic shape. Personally, I'm open to removing the building tags on the middle shelter as well.
5m4u9 (2025-04-29 02:34:08+00:00): Hola, sería genial que añadas los nombres de los edificios para que se tenga más referencia.
MxxCon (2025-04-28 20:49:20+00:00): Thanks for the help here. 👍
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165525452
felipeeugenio (2025-04-28 13:02:01+00:00): Hola. Esto no es una plataforma de pruebas. Es la base de datos misma.
Saludos
Lumikeiju (2025-04-27 23:42:20+00:00): Note - due to an issue with JOSM, this changeset caused version bumps of some elements with "phone"/"contact:phone" tags that did not actually receive any tag or geometry changes.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-04-27 23:20:47+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12793519085

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-03 09:53:50+00:00): Hello!

You used
natural=wetlande0
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1381638919/history

Have you maybe meant
natural=wetland
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
ilias_ (2025-04-28 00:52:30+00:00): that is one big bbox
LaLinea (2025-04-27 23:56:36+00:00): Werner Scherer ist umgezogen:  https://osm.org/changeset/165526615
George Sears (2025-04-28 15:26:00+00:00): Ciao, vedo che hai usato come fonte le immagini satellitari Esri World Imagery e da quel che vedo io sembra che hai mappato tree_row sul perimetro delle proprietà, dove sembra esserci solo un muro o al massimo una recinzione/siepe. Sei sicuro che non sia meglio usare barrier=hedge?
aharvey (2025-04-28 02:06:39+00:00): Thanks. You could consider adding sidewalk=no to say there is no footpath here.
fortera_au (2025-06-26 09:00:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
Kovoschiz (2025-04-28 09:19:33+00:00): Again, please read the guidelines before you make such major changes. They exist as they are for a reason. `=trunk` is only used on roads with a `ref=` .
NorthCrab_upload (2025-04-28 00:40:44+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawną składnię. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres strony internetowej został skrócony przez serwis typu URL shortener.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12793686624

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
afgb1977 (2025-04-29 02:12:48+00:00): Hello.
Just one question, what is your source for this data?
dadavid (2025-04-28 10:17:32+00:00): Hi, 

ist das hier wirklich ein WBH oder vielleicht eher ein Bergwerkstollen? 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:man_made%3Dadit

Viele Grüße
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165527453
Smoo77 (2025-10-06 13:24:08+00:00): Gewissermaßen beides, dient jedoch der Wassergewinnung.

https://www.fr.de/rhein-main/hochtaunus/glueck-homburg-11267218.html
NeisBot (2025-05-17 15:10:24+00:00): Hi victoria ucap, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 22 building(s)
- 25 natural(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=165527576
MikeN (2025-04-29 12:42:16+00:00): Nice job building out Millegeville!   Tip - pressing Q after drawing buildings will make them square.
user_22186234 (2025-04-29 20:23:19+00:00): Thanks for the tip!
dadavid (2025-04-28 10:15:30+00:00): Hi, 

du hattest um Feedback zu deiner Bearbeitung gebeten :) Sieht gut aus, danke und weiterhin viel Spaß weiterhin beim Mappen :))

David
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165527627
eggie (2025-11-20 10:43:01+00:00): Dag padvinder,

Hoe kan dit een parkeerplaats zijn als je er met geen mogelijkheid kan komen?
Graag reactie,

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-11-20 12:21:32+00:00): Ook op de pdok ziet het er anders uit en is de loop van het pad ook anders.
Gr eggie
eggie (2025-11-20 19:18:21+00:00): Ik heb het parkeerterrein verwijderd.
Dat is er niet meer.

MVG
eggie
padvinder (2025-11-21 23:52:06+00:00): dit gebied wordt momenteel op de schop genomen
eggie (2025-11-22 06:01:06+00:00): Klopt..
Bedankt voor je reactie.
Mvg..
eggie
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:58:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
dadavid (2025-04-28 10:14:06+00:00): Hi, 

was ist denn hier die Quelle? :) 
Eingetragen ist leider keine. 


Viele Grüße

David
lberges (2025-04-28 16:38:04+00:00): Der Name findet sich in der Wikipedia, sowie in meinem Navi, im Geoportal RLP und bei der Post.
streckenkundler (2025-04-28 19:25:20+00:00): Sind das für OSM nutzbare Quellen?
NeisBot (2025-05-17 15:10:23+00:00): Hi Luz E, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 12 natural(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=165528551
VictorIE (2025-09-12 04:54:56+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12793777298/history

I see that you edited a post office. Did the post office move? There is another one mapped here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4538352289
HellMap (2025-05-08 16:22:16+00:00): Hello,

Could you please clarify a bit more about this gate https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12793778879 here? The road is not tagged as private to either side, but it is now impossible to reach the East part by motor vehicle. The gate also implies pedestrians/bicycles are not allowed. But there is a bicycle route here, which is now blocked. Are there any signs here? Are there any signs or new gates at the bridge to the South?

Thanks
Toms12345 (2025-05-08 16:41:17+00:00): Hi, this isn’t the first time I’ve been riding there and got stopped at the gate that says it’s private property. Entry is not allowed.

I’m not sure if the road should be tagged as private, but I guess it is now. I haven’t seen the bridge, since entry wasn’t allowed and I couldn’t get to it.

I took a picture of how it looks at the 56°58'50.6"N 24°26'48.6"E https://imgur.com/a/2ZiiWaN

This is the place I took a photo: https://imgur.com/a/Jyb1peL
Toms12345 (2025-05-08 16:44:10+00:00): P.S. On the gate (or hurdle?), it says:
Private Property
Entry Prohibited
HellMap (2025-05-08 17:21:30+00:00): Thanks for clarifying, the photo is helpful.

I believe there is now a new road here to the East of residentials: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/372445873 . I traced it from Strava, so I am not 100% sure about anything here, but this appears to match the news article https://beztabu.tv3.lv/nejedzibas/nagelmuizas-iedzivotaji-soditi-ar-elektribas-atslegsanu/ that talks about a new road. I assume the bridge has not been rebuilt to allow motor vehicles, as that would have been much more expensive than the article talks about. Cadaster plot and road lines do indeed suggest that the road we are talking about is through private property. It used to be the only access road to the residentials and it was open a couple years ago with no signs or barriers, but I guess now the owner has "closed" it since there is an alternate route. I guess the new road will need to be surveyed at some point.

Anyway, I adjusted everything to the best I can figure out based on the limited research and sources and you explanation.
Toms12345 (2025-05-08 17:35:37+00:00): Thank you.

Next time I’m there, I’ll try riding from the other side and update if necessary.
richlv (2025-05-09 06:48:53+00:00): Thank you both for the useful updates.

Too bad the bicycle route is quite rekt now with the extra detour. The circular one less so, just passing through is eww now.
https://cycling.waymarkedtrails.org/#?map=14.0/56.9813/24.4608
TrickyFoxy (2025-05-12 20:43:07+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166172657
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-04 12:34:24+00:00): Hello!

You used
building=Hut B
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9609638549/history

Have you maybe meant
building=hut
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
ivanbranco (2025-04-28 15:54:29+00:00): Ciao Emabarto,

ho visto che hai aggiunto tanti suffissi _link. Qua ad esempio, da primary a primary_link: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25188286/

Ho aperto la wiki di highway=primary_link e leggo: "primary_link should be used on a slip road/ramp which connects a primary to a secondary, tertiary, or other minor highway", tradotto con DeepL: "primary_link deve essere utilizzato su una strada di scorrimento/rampa che collega una strada primaria a una secondaria, terziaria o ad altre strade minori".

Ma nel caso linkato quella way collega una way primary (way/25310236) ad un'altra way primary (w541829193), non a una way di livello inferiore. Mi sfugge qualcosa?
Emabarto (2025-05-12 06:27:19+00:00): Ciao Ivan,
ho consultato la pagina https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_link , ad At-grade int recita: The most common type of _link cuts the corner at an intersection, leaving a small triangular "island" between it and the through carriageways/through lanes.
Secondo te può andare bene per le modifiche che ho fatto? altrimenti sento la community che dice
Mingwei (2025-08-26 16:24:33+00:00): Please do not map bike lanes as separate ways unless they are separated from the roadway (i.e. class 4, protected)
iandees (2025-04-30 12:44:19+00:00): When adding a street address, make sure to use the same spelling and capitalization of the road name as it exists in OpenStreetMap. In this case, you used "PLEASANT HILL RD" but it should have been "Pleasant Hill Road".
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165530668
wies1 (2025-04-28 04:47:12+00:00): Hier wurden Adressdaten ergaenzt.
dadavid (2025-04-28 10:11:35+00:00): Hallo Chris Hiller, 

du hast hier auf dem Feld einen Laden eingetragen, der Gleitschirm-Equipment verkauft. Das ist so sicherlich nicht richtig. 

Was wolltest du denn damit aussagen, ist dort ein Gleitschirm-Start-/ oder -Landeplatz? 

Schau dazu gern auch ins Wiki. Korrekt wäre hier vermutlich sport=free_flying und free_flying:takeoff=yes

Viele Grüße

David


https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dfree_flying

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dfree_flying
Chris Hiller (2025-04-29 06:26:16+00:00): Hallo David,
danke für den Hinweis. Leider ist die Erstellung in OSMAND nicht sehr übersichtlich. Ich habe den Fehler korrigiert.
Viele Grüße
Chris
dadavid (2025-05-03 17:58:29+00:00): Alles klar, ja vielen Dank fürs Verbessern :) Das sieht super aus jetzt. 

Weiterhin viel Spass beim Mappen :) 

David
TrickyFoxy (2025-05-12 20:40:21+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166172569
NorthCrab_upload (2025-04-28 05:30:44+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12793943335

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
aharvey (2025-04-28 08:35:00+00:00): Hi, we now have two objects for Dalrymple-Hay Nature Reserve, where we should only have one. It's preferable to retain the history https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history where possible, so in this case I'd like to remove the duplicate you just added and repair the existing relation.
aharvey (2025-04-28 08:39:00+00:00): I've repair it now.
ArchangelEkim (2025-04-28 09:32:48+00:00): Why have it as a boundary rather than an area? Can it be switched to an area so it shows properly in editor?
aharvey (2025-04-28 09:50:25+00:00): In Australia according to https://taginfo.geofabrik.de/australia-oceania:australia/tags/boundary=protected_area we have 8,586 as relations and 3,802 as ways so both are used and valid.

Until OSM can better support retaining an object history as it changes between a node/way/relation I'd prefer to leave it unless it needs to be changed. Sometimes it's unavoidable so we have to accept the history becomes more fragmented.

It does show in iD though, if you select the way then select the relation that the way is part of you end up with https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?changeset=165531563#map=17/-33.737030/151.157836 which is the relation selected.

I'm not saying we can't change it to a way, but let's discuss and consult other mappers first.
ArchangelEkim (2025-04-28 10:00:47+00:00): Ah okay, good to know, its a shame though, cause that is what I feel atm is that while the general structure of OSM is reliable the map has definitely gotten fractured with confusing components.
MassCartog (2025-04-28 12:43:09+00:00): Hi welcome to OSM. In this changeset you removed was seems to many valid sidewalks and foot paths, also many valid parking lots. 

Could you explain why you have done this? On OSM we don't removed valid features if they exist on the ground.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-04-29 19:50:07+00:00): reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165607425
NeisBot (2025-05-17 15:10:23+00:00): Hi Muuuuuur, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 86% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 3 highway(s)
- 1 building(s)
- 8 landuse(')

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=165532130
NeisReview (2025-05-17 15:13:35+00:00): Thx for (already) reverting.
aharvey (2025-04-28 08:41:52+00:00): did you confirm https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12793967751 via survey? Without a survey you can't really know if it's a ford or a bridge or a culvert.
ArchangelEkim (2025-04-28 09:12:11+00:00): Yeah, that should be via Imagery, you can actually see it through the trees, the rocky surface of the ford allows it to be seen.
dadavid (2025-04-28 09:51:09+00:00): Das war vorher (mit Ausnahme der MKG Gbr) bereits völlig korrekt gemappt; Ich habe den CS zurückgesetzt. 

VG
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165532473
Dimitar155 (2025-04-28 06:44:47+00:00): Здравей!

Началото на изтритата пътека се вижда(ше) от високата страна. От долната страна може и да не се вижда. Изглеждаше леко утъпкана когато я добавях.

Поздрави,
Митко
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-04-29 19:50:08+00:00): reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165607425
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-04-29 19:57:17+00:00): Please don't change highway class without discussion.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165532782
user_5359 (2025-05-01 14:32:40+00:00): Hello! What is the mean of the tags
myosmnote = villageMapping2024
pcode = 178469
?
CK27 (2025-08-21 15:24:28+00:00): Hello! The tag myosmnote=villageMapping2024 is a wrong tagging in my data. I know that pcode means Myanmar Place Code. Do you know if there is related content about this on the OSM Wiki for Myanmar?
CK27 (2026-05-08 15:55:12+00:00): Hello! I know this tag is not documented on the OSM Wiki. I’m working on Myanmar data, and since pcode=* is widely used there for Myanmar Place Codes, I think it is currently one of the most practical ways to filter Myanmar-specific settlement mapping in OSM.
user_5359 (2026-05-12 16:26:38+00:00): Sorry for the late reply. Unfortunately, based on pcode’s description (the tag is apparently not used exclusively for Myanmar), I can’t tell if this is a hierarchical structure (most of the links in the wiki return a 404 error). For country-specific structures, I think a descriptive name like ref:MM: would be more self-explanatory.
maro21 (2025-04-29 19:59:38+00:00): Jakie jest źródło tej nazwy?
OlgierdR (2025-04-30 07:39:29+00:00): Źródła nazwy nie znam (oprócz prostego skojarzenia "sakura" = wiśna po japońsku; źródłem wiedzy o nazwie są internety ;-)
yrtimiD (2025-04-28 15:52:31+00:00): Welcome and thanks for your contribution!
What kind of problem with this path?
yrtimiD (2025-04-28 15:53:27+00:00): is there gates on both sides?
(no need to remove private roads, but mark them as private like you did)
Eliel Louzoun (2025-04-29 12:09:00+00:00): There are no gates - it is simply a fence with no entrance
Carto'Cité (2026-02-06 14:53:57+00:00): Hello.

Tu as aussi placé 2 guichets Transilien dans la salle d'échange RER (cf. https://indoorequal.org/#map=19.81/48.8618276/2.3468566&level=-4), donc après les portiques. Il(s) ne serai(en)t pas plutôt dans le couloir immédiatement à l'ouest de la salle d'échange ?

Antoine.

Il ne sont pas plutôt à l'extérieur
eino (2026-02-06 16:52:51+00:00): Hello Antoine,
euh, je t'avoue que comme la modification date d'un peu j'ai un doute. Il y a des guichets des deux côtés du portique (guichet d'information à l'intérieur au milieu de la salle d'échange, et guichet de vente à l'extérieur), mais je ne sais plus lesquels j'avais en tête à l'époque. Je vais revérifier en passant, mais si ça te semble illogique n'hésite pas à modifier ou supprimer.
Carto'Cité (2026-02-06 17:19:37+00:00): Ok merci pour l'info.
Le problème est que un des guichets est au même endroit que DeliCrepe (https://www.osm.org/way/1036323798) : ça fait beaucoup pour un petit espace :-) Je vais en supprimer un des 2, à l'occasion si tu passes dans le coin je suis preneur d'infos fraîches. 
Antoine.
eino (2026-02-07 08:01:49+00:00): Ah oui effectivement. :-) J'y passe régulièrement, j'essayerai de tirer tout ça au clair
nevw (2025-04-28 08:02:52+00:00): Hi, if you are adding a business listing to a multistory building you need to add all the details to a new node within the building outline unless you are the sole occupant of the whole building.
I also noticed that this building was tagged as:
addr:housenumber=2
addr:street=Market Street
building=office
building:levels=7
but you have changed these to 
171 Clarence Street with the building having 8 levels.
Do you want me to revert your changeset so that you can add the details to the right building?
aharvey (2025-04-30 08:26:02+00:00): No reply, I've reverted this in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165534070
TrickyFoxy (2025-06-29 23:49:10+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/216495834

name="

Did you want to delete name and made a mistake?
LouisXIV (2025-05-16 13:54:50+00:00): Why did you also deleted the `leisure=track` and 
`sport=cycling` tags ? I think they are appropriate here, it's not a simple bicycle path.
gscholz (2025-05-18 07:02:13+00:00): Hi Luis,
no that is a misinterpretation. I fixed two ways positioned on top of each other. If you think,those tags are missing, please add them yourself.
Kind regards
Guido
StVeit_Maps (2025-04-30 12:38:18+00:00): Sieht gut aus. [Antwort auf review_requested=yes]
flohoff (2025-04-28 13:32:21+00:00): Moin,
weil ich eben schon so eine nummer gefixed habe - Wenn du ein tor als locked einträgst dann sind die wege dahinter von denen davor routingtechnisch abgetrennt weil durch das tor keiner kommt.

Wenn du die dahinter nicht noch als access=private markierst bekommt man sog. "Routing Inseln"  - d.h. formal glaubt der router das er dahinter routen kann - also einen subgraphen hat, der hat aber gar keine verbindung mit dem davor. D.h. die Addressen werden komplett unerreichbar. 

Also - unerreichbare wege hinter toren auch als access=private markieren.

Flo
fortera_au (2025-04-29 00:21:51+00:00): Hi there, the AIP-ERSA documents are copyrighted, we can't use them as a data source.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165535044
trial (2025-04-30 19:05:25+00:00): Merci d'avoir corrigé ce vandalisme : pas mal comme première modification !

N. B. : le titre de la modification était assez clair... "Modification falsifiée"
mueschel (2025-05-03 09:15:08+00:00): Hi,
you added the new tag "station_deux_roues" here - what does it mean?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12794145071

And: Are you sure the output of this station is just 22 kW? That's not really enough to charge 6 cars in parallel. 
And: the station is taggd to have no sockets at all which is clearly wrong. Please don't add "socket...=no" tags, just add those that exist, including their count.
tykayn (2025-05-03 09:22:33+00:00): hi,
yes station_deux_roues is a mistake.

the output of charging_station:output is documented in the wiki as the maximum power delivered you can have in the most capable socket, it is not the installed power output. 
people are often confused about this, we should find an other tag to describe this, because the charging_station:output is very useful to find a capable enough station at once.

about infos for socket being absent, it is useful to know that the info has been checked and that there is no need to double check, don't you think?
mueschel (2025-05-03 09:33:49+00:00): Where did you find this definition of the output?
The Wiki clearly says
"charging_station:output=<xxx> kW – Use this to specify the maximum output of the entire station: This value can often be found on the back of the charge points. For a station with multiple charge points, add them all together for the entire station maximum ouput."
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=charging_station

A matching station with a high enough output on a specific socket you can find by looking at the socket:*:output tags.

It's not useful to tag all the sockets that don't exist. Did you check if there is really no socket:cee_red_63a available? Just add the sockets that do exist.
tykayn (2025-05-03 14:05:43+00:00): that is quite a topic that deserves some discussion with the community. i opened a topic on the french forum here since it is located in France

https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/faut-il-mapper-les-sockets-absents-sur-les-bornes-de-recharge/33697

i did not add the cee_red_63a data because i have no info about it in the open data from fr datagouv, and there are globally no chances that it is present on things made by RossiniEnergy.
Udarian (2025-04-28 23:08:37+00:00): whats your source for removing the address from way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/435238907 .