piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
dcskobuffs (2024-02-28 19:09:02+00:00): Correction: Source used was Maxar SecureWatch Imagery 2024-02-01
MxxCon (2024-02-29 03:08:00+00:00): Hello.
Please note that your this edit is going to be reverted in full since it damaged 2 buildings on  7th ave. Their shapes got mangled and do not match what's visible from the satellite imagery.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148025169
Glassman (2024-02-28 19:33:57+00:00): If this is a MTB trail, I'd recommend tagging it as highway=path + bike=designated. The other tags you added are great.

highway=cycleway is what you typically find in a city or like the 
Burke Gilman trail or the Centennial Trail out in the country.
marczoutendijk (2024-02-28 21:11:26+00:00): Comment should read: 
Highways west of Castillejar!
lenochod (2024-09-19 09:38:15+00:00): Ahoj gastone.

Proč jsi přidal adresu jak na budovu tak i jako bod? Používá se buď jedno, nebo druhé.

S díky za odpověď
Lukáš
gaston68cz (2024-09-22 20:45:03+00:00): Ahoj Lukáši,
co si vybavuju snažil jsem se přidat adresu ale nešlo mi to uložit dokud jsem tam nepřidal i ten bod. Přišlo mi to trochu divné ale myslel jsem že to asi nějaký důvod má. Moc přesně už si to nevybavuju.
Jestli je to špatně klidně ten bod zruším, snad zjistím jak.
gaston68cz (2024-09-22 21:03:25+00:00): Koukám že jsem to napsal zmateně: takže chtěl jsem přidat budovu s adresou, ale ta adresa se tam neukládala. Proto jsem tam přidal i samostatnou adresu, pak už to šlo.
Honza
lenochod (2024-09-25 16:03:45+00:00): Když v iD označíš bod a dáš nad ním pr. tl. myši, je tam ikonka pro smazání.
Díky za opravu
Lukáš
gaston68cz (2024-09-29 19:28:56+00:00): Díky za návod, snad se mi to povedlo
Honza
MxxCon (2024-02-29 03:13:08+00:00): Hello.
Did this business change names and website but kept the same phone number?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148025897
alessandrolandi (2024-02-29 19:12:47+00:00): Yes, I double-checked on the website that it is the same number
K12230LF (2025-12-02 15:21:36+00:00): Hello, a priori il y a un interlocuteur qui indique que le chemin tracé avec Strava n'existe pas : https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4967421

Est-ce que tu as moyen d'aller voir sur place ?
acubens71 (2025-12-02 20:35:16+00:00): Salut, malheureusement j'habite à l'autre bout de la région, ce n'est pas du tout un coin où je peux aller de moi-même :(

Niveau vérif : il y a tjs une trace sur Strava, mais faible, et sur l'ortho de 2023 on voit un départ de chemin (non carrossable). Peut-être qu'il s'est embroussaillé entre temps ?
Pas sur de la suite à donner pour le coup.
Jordi MF (2024-02-28 23:08:41+00:00): Hola Pep,

Gracias por intentar mejorar OSM. ¿Qué has querido mapear en esta zona? Lo único que vei que has añadido es le nombre de "Can Josep" a toda una manzana de edificios y una dirección. No parece correcto, por eso te pregunto qué querías añadir en la base de datos.

Gracias y un saludo.
Pep150 (2024-02-29 10:37:05+00:00): Me he equivocado  y no lo puedo borrrar, he puesto mi nombre porque llevo un reloj de teleasistencia, si lo podeis borrar me haríais un favor, muchas gracias
Ewen Hill (2024-03-01 08:53:04+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM - This a appears to be a private road and the road should be set to access=private if you could do this please.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148026557
fortera_au (2024-02-29 01:28:31+00:00): Hi, is this actually a track or is it just a driveway? If it's a driveway (even if it's dirt) it should be tagged as highway=service, service=driveway, and then you can pick an appropriate surface= tag (unpaved is a generic one that would cover it too)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148026581
CrysMelyn (2024-03-01 21:44:37+00:00): Is there a reason for the grouping of "Camperdown Country Park and Templeton Woods"? They are separate entities in the eyes of Dundee City Council, reflected by official publications, signage, etc.
Mastrick_Mapper (2024-03-01 22:02:11+00:00): They were originally grouped together. I separated them (not entirely) in this changeset.
aTarom (2024-02-29 09:45:04+00:00): Hi, tags correction?
Why are the labels specifying the time period of the name not correct?
Cheers
mapperue (2024-02-29 12:47:15+00:00): Hi, it's my mistake.
This changeset is already reverted.
HansWürstchen (2024-02-28 21:44:23+00:00): Hallo MorWest, willkommen bei OSM, warum möchte der Besitzer denn nicht das existente Objekte in OSM erfasst sind, diese sind doch offensichtlich, vor Ort , in Sat-Bildern, bei den jeweiligen Landesvermessungsämtern, bei maps kannst sogar bis in seinen Pool schauen?!
Es wäre schön wenn Du die Objekte selbst wieder einfügst, der Besitzer hat nämlich "leider" keinen Anspruch auf Löschung, Stichwort: Vandalismus!
MfG!
limes11 (2024-03-01 07:03:56+00:00): Revertiert, um die History zu erhalten.
Tomas Straupis (2024-02-29 06:52:48+00:00): This road is planned and it even has existing addresses. I will restore the road.
SK53 (2024-03-08 13:58:02+00:00): Why do you think https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1255759628 is allotments? It would be a very strange location & looks nothing like allotments on aerial imagery.
pantufla (2024-10-12 11:43:37+00:00): Hola, qué sería esto?
gscholz (2024-03-06 08:33:46+00:00): Hi Toddtodd,
this changeset has left behind a broken bridge relation:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-89.21554&lat=13.70199&zoom=18&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=148028323

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8003963/history

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Toddtodd (2024-03-06 14:39:13+00:00): Ok, I think it's correct now, sorry about that.
gscholz (2024-03-06 17:15:47+00:00): Thanks for your quick response.
Guido
NorthCrab_upload (2024-02-28 20:50:25+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/235320654
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/235320701

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
WieKo68 (2024-06-10 18:54:05+00:00): poprawione
citrula (2024-03-01 05:20:48+00:00): Nice work! If you don't mind me asking, what is your source for the alignment of these roads? They don't appear on aerial imagery yet.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148028712
pantufla (2024-10-12 11:44:40+00:00): Hola, por favor no poner como agencia de viajes. Si es un puesto de policía y mapsme no te deja añadir esta categoría, te recomiendo entrar a www.openstreetmap.org y editarlo ahí. Gracias.
gscholz (2024-03-01 07:59:41+00:00): HiOzdemirtahaa,
this changeset has create errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=29.80249&lat=40.74607&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=148029071

As you may know, this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps. Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2024-03-04 07:31:03+00:00): Hi Ozdemirtahaa, 
this error still exits, can I get your feedback here?
Guido
gscholz (2024-03-06 07:21:21+00:00): Hi Ozdemirtahaa,
this error still exits, can I get your feedback here?
Guido
gscholz (2024-03-07 07:24:55+00:00): Hi Ozdemirtahaa, 
due to your missing feedback I have reverted this changeset to fix those issues.
Guido
VictorIE (2024-03-01 12:58:02+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1255774032

Partial duplicate building.
b-unicycling (2024-03-01 17:53:01+00:00): I have deleted the duplicate, thanks!
HellMap (2024-02-29 16:23:41+00:00): Hello,

When adding crossing info about crossing islands (`crossing:island=yes`), you shouldn't set a `yes` value when the island is mapped separately and two or more crossing are mapped, for example here https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11673936305 .
nevw (2024-02-28 22:23:43+00:00): Neither of the lake you added are visble on Bing or Esri imagery and are reverted (deleted)
NieWnen (2024-02-28 21:47:59+00:00): Zmiana wycofana (148030168). Te lotniska są już oznaczone, nie ma potrzeby ich duplikowania.
MxxCon (2024-02-29 03:16:48+00:00): Hello.
I ask you once again, what is the source of this changes?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148030090
user_14538650 (2024-02-29 01:43:12+00:00): thank you so much!
BCNorwich (2024-02-29 06:52:55+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Private garages would be the description of the building rather than the formal name. I've amended it to a description tag.

Regards Bernard.
ottwiz (2024-02-29 20:33:52+00:00): *of water feature.
BCNorwich (2024-02-29 07:43:13+00:00): Hi, 1-13 Albert Close is a description rather than a formal name. I've amended the tags, the description is still within the tags.

I've tweaked some areas and reinstated the footpaths. Are there some passageways through buildings here?

Regards Bernard.
rodolforolf (2024-02-29 08:00:26+00:00): Hi Bernard, thanks. The footpaths here are private, I tried to find a way to create that. They are partly passageways, underneath the first floor of some houses. 

Thanks for your help, I'm still learning OpenStreetMap.

Regards,
Rolf
BCNorwich (2024-02-29 08:24:59+00:00): Hi, Glad to help, there's a lot for you to learn. 

It's OK to tag the paths as access=private, but only if the public are denied access.

For the paths through buildings, section off the path and tag as foot=yes
highway=footway
tunnel=building_passage, I've done two so you can see the method.

Regards Bernard.
emersonveenstra (2024-03-01 15:07:03+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148100328 for breaking the map, changing an admin boundary to a bicycle route. Please create a new relation for the bicycle route
Xvtn (2024-02-29 21:55:34+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes here. Looks good to me! Thanks for your contribution.
InsertUser (2024-02-29 16:13:44+00:00): Please incorporate existing traces into new features rather than deleting and recreating them in a slightly different position. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history
InsertUser (2024-02-29 16:16:37+00:00): Please incorporate existing traces into new features rather than deleting and recreating them in a slightly different position. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history
silversurfer83 (2024-03-01 16:08:11+00:00): Gude,

du hast darum gebeten, dass sich jemand deine Änderung ansieht.
Ich mach das mal.

Dass die Strecke nun ein "Feldweg" ist, hast du ja in der direkt folgenden Änderung verbessert. Passt also.
Mich würde interessieren, wie genau die Beschilderung der Hasunger Str. nun ist. Ist das nun ein VZ 250 (roter Kreis) an den Zugängen? Ist es noch eine Kreisstr.? (unwahrscheinlich)
Hast du ggf. mal einen Link zu einem Zeitungsartikel oder einer Pressemeldung der zuständigen Straßenbaubehörde?

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148032706
JP100099 (2024-03-05 15:49:55+00:00): bin heute dran vorbei gekommen und hab mal ein bild gemacht https://ibb.co/Wv3mMNy
was offizielles habe ich leider nicht, aber die straße wurde endwidmed und zählt jetzt als innerördliche straße. Die hauptstraßen haben jetzt das "geänderte straßenführung" und der seitenweg ist mit dem kombischild abgesperrt. Die straßenmakierung ist einfach die kurve durchgezogen. von seiten der hasunger straße steht ein vorfahrt gewähren schild.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148032706
silversurfer83 (2024-03-05 21:17:54+00:00): Hi :)

der link zu dem Bild funktioniert bei mir leider nicht
JP100099 (2024-03-05 22:26:58+00:00): habs gemerkt, falschen link kopiert. Der hier sollte gehen https://ibb.co/G57SfwM
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148032706
silversurfer83 (2024-03-06 07:54:26+00:00): Moin :)

das Bild hat funktionert. Danke.
Hier ist meine Interpretation der Lage:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/33492368

Interessant wäre nun noch zu wissen, wie die Beschilderung von Wenigenhausen aus gesehen aussieht und ob die Geschwindigkeitsbeschränkungen der Heerstr/L3312 so alle korrekt sind (können je nach Fahrtrichtung unterschiedlich sein).

Es gibt eine schöne Seite die dabei hilft die passenden Tags anhand der Beschilderung zu finden:
https://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/

Bei Fragen immer raus damit


happy mapping
silversurfer83
JP100099 (2024-03-09 17:46:34+00:00): Moin, von der anderen seite ist es wie vorher, die 30 ist bis Ortsausgang und da steht dann auch das landwirtschaftlicher Verkehr frei Schild.
Ich hatte mal bei der Stadt nachgefragt, evtl kommt nochmal eine Änderung der Beschilderung, dann würde ich das in ner neuen Änderung festhalten. Ansonsten sollte es so passen

In anderer Sache, gibts hier ne Möglichkeit direkt Dokumente oder Bilder hochzuladen, oder einfach extrerne Plattformen verlinken?
silversurfer83 (2024-03-09 20:49:33+00:00): Ok. Anpassung bei Änderung :)

Bilder: hat OSM nicht vorgesehen. Die können über das "image=$link" von beliebiger Quelle verlinkt werden.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:image
hmcnally (2024-02-29 00:15:06+00:00): This home was completed in 2018.  It is a new address in Enfield.
stevea (2024-03-24 14:12:33+00:00): May I ask why you changed Grand Rounds NSB from network=ncn to network=rcn?  I don't think there is a right or wrong answer here, I'm very much in listening mode.  Thank you.
Jordan Leick (2024-03-24 14:55:28+00:00): Sure! The USBRS is a national network of bike routes, with 18,000 miles so far. The routes are national in that they help connect multiple states, while. Parts of the Grand Rounds trail network along the river are on the USBRS, but that relation is tagged separately.
stevea (2024-03-24 18:13:39+00:00): Um, have you read our USBRS wiki?  (Full disclosure, I am substantially its author; other OSM volunteers help enter the route data, one recently from Germany!).  Please see https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/USBRS and if you care to read about the German guy who helped, see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/aashto-s-usbrs-proposals-spring-2024-round-new-national-bicycle-route-proposals/110761 ).

What seems like it is happening is that a new category of "national" bike routes is emerging, namely these "designated by a national-level agency" (Grand Rounds / GR in an "All American Road" as part of the National Scenic Byway system, so designated by the US Secretary of Transportation).  See https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/United_States/Bicycle_Networks , the "Quasi-National" section (National is for USBRs).

Both national and quasi-national are agreed to be tagged with network=ncn in the USA, making them both red in Cycle Map layer (or pinkish in CyclOSM).  So, this was tagged ncn a few months ago, which made me think that a new "category" of quasi-national routes is emerging:  those which are All American Roads (or NSB, a subset of AARs).

Yet, it may be that your local view of the cycleway networks is "easier" to see GR as regional / purple, rather than national / red, since the Twin Cities have a rather complex confluence of USBRs 20, 41, 45 (MRT) and 45A (MRT-Alt).

There's a long history here, and lots of people (in OSM, in state transportation circles, at the national AASHTO level...) strive to get this correct (since about 2011).  However, I really want to hear local concerns / preferences.  Thank you once again in advance.
Jordan Leick (2024-03-24 18:26:36+00:00): I have no strong opinions on the issue, and no I hadn’t seen the wiki on USBRS before, so thanks for sharing all the info! I would say to feel free to change back anything as you think is necessary, and I won’t modify network tags moving forward, unless something is clearly incorrect according to the wiki.

I don’t recall making the network change in the last month (or even in the last 6 months), so I wonder if it was a part of an older changeset. I’m a lot more cautious now about what I change, and I tend to stick to the conventions and tags that I know really well.

-Jordan
stevea (2024-03-24 18:30:40+00:00): That sounds great.  I'm going to be doing some watching and my usual listening, as I'm cautious about making "wholesale" changes to tagging, too.  There really might be this new category of "quasi-national" emerging, and GR is the very first one in OSM, blazing a trail.

Maybe days, maybe a week, maybe a month, things don't move too swiftly in OSM, that gives time for consensus.  I wrote what I wrote about this potential new category into our wiki a couple / three months ago, so as to see if other NSBs / AARs get entered into OSM...we'll see.

Thanks for your good dialog!
yitimox (2024-04-10 03:31:21+00:00): ellerinize sağlık ancak çoğu bölgede varolan durakları eklemişsiniz karmaşıklık yaratıyor bu durum
ManeraKai (2024-04-16 01:42:22+00:00): I wrote about it here: https://t.me/osm_tr/10137
user_14538650 (2024-02-29 01:43:24+00:00): thank you so much!
GOwin (2024-02-29 03:39:23+00:00): Good luck with the initiative!

Thankfully, there's Mapillary imagery available.  I checked a few POIs in the area, and added fixmes. The names are descriptive, rather than the actual shop name -- but I didn't add them because I don't have the proper diacritics for the characters.
Udarian (2024-02-29 14:19:11+00:00): Why did you tag 107 as tertiary link, links are only supposed to be used between two roads like a highway exit ramp. Its seems like that way should be residential to me but if you fell it’s tertiary then tag as that, its definitely not a link.
Udarian (2024-02-29 14:21:25+00:00): Also, what do you mean by “unlisted bus stops”?
notd3nny (2024-03-02 07:27:19+00:00): bus stop sign+bench is physically there, and the 52 bus stops there. but it is not on the md transit app, and does not have a name given to it on any md transit site or documentation
notd3nny (2024-03-02 07:27:39+00:00): fixed tertiary link
Udarian (2024-03-03 00:31:12+00:00): I do remember that they changed the bus routes a bit around November 13 2023, and admittedly the mapping of bus routes I’m OSM is one of the areas I don’t have that much experience or knowledge on mapping so I don’t know how to figure out what the correct new alignments of bus routes are now. I also don’t have the time an money to take every rout and using a gps tracker app on my phone figure it out. I am planning to message drynwk about it since he seems to know more than me, I just haven’t gotten to that yet though I plan to at some point in the next week. 

As a note Miami dades data can be a bit out of date at times (especially on the open data hub) so it may take them some time to get the new bus route up.
felipeeugenio (2024-02-29 12:29:22+00:00): Hola. Dos temas
1) Borró el barrio de cuajo- No se llama así o se trata de un error?
2) Parece inverosimil la cantidad de cámaras por calle. es así o se le copiaron los nodos?


saludos
rhtb0 (2024-02-29 04:12:25+00:00): 부산방향은 아직 원래 도로 사용하고 있습니다.
MxxCon (2024-02-29 03:18:48+00:00): Hello.
Do you know the phone number or website of this biz?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148033780
user_14538650 (2024-02-29 05:40:08+00:00): cảm ơn anh
dpolovinkin (2024-05-15 14:17:48+00:00): hi, thanks a lot for contributing!
just wanted to notice - for you to add buildings without a skewed geometry, for them to be normal rectangles- - use Q button when you selected the area, so buildings which you add won't have to be fixed later :)
Frans S (2024-02-29 16:46:43+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Buildings often inaccurate mapped.
Buildings not squared.


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148034121
IraGersh (2024-03-01 01:35:15+00:00): Thanks for combining them. Was Rapid the only way to do that?  Not JOSM or ID?
MxxCon (2024-03-01 01:56:49+00:00): josm and id can do it as well.
in iD and RapiD you select paths and hit "C" to "combine". In Josm...I don't remember off the top of my head😅I'm not in front of the computer right now. But it also has a shortcut to combine ways.
zluuzki (2024-02-29 07:56:06+00:00): What is the point of this & other massive quality reductions?
phoenixsaigon1698 (2024-02-29 04:23:16+00:00): Bạn ơi, Ngõ 622 Minh Khai vẫn cho 2 chiều xe máy và oto mà.
Vietnam Outdoor [VNO] (2024-03-06 02:17:04+00:00): Not from 0600-0900 and 1600-1900. Always completely stuck because the map leads cars through Ngo 622.
I haven't figured out yet how to set a specific time for the one-way rule. But figured it's better to set the one-way rule anyway to avoid traffic jams.
phoenixsaigon1698 (2024-03-06 02:20:46+00:00): Mình đã set cấm rẽ oto theo giờ ở https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16505180 rồi.
Vietnam Outdoor [VNO] (2024-03-06 02:34:11+00:00): ok =)
philam48 (2024-06-03 02:22:34+00:00): Hi thanks for these edits :) Just to clarify that these and similar footpaths tagged as bicycle=yes should not be tagged in this way. They're standard footpaths where bicycles are not permitted to ride as per Victorian Road Rules. I understand that there technically isn't a 'shared path end' sign, but as there is a road between the Gardiners Creek Trail and these paths, that doesn't require such a sign to exist.
cs09736 (2024-06-03 02:46:06+00:00): Which roads in particular were you looking at? I believe that all standard footpaths I've tagged with bicycle=yes and designation=shared_path are directly connected to a shared path without being interrupted by a road. The bicycle=yes tags all end once they reach a road (which is when the shared path ends under the Vic road rules).
This issue was discussed briefly in the Oceania Discord and I made sure that all footpaths I tagged like this have both the footway=sidewalk and designation=shared_path tags so they could be found and updated if we decided bicycle=yes wasn't the best way to tag them. Perhaps we should bring it up again, and in the mailing list too. Melbourne seems to be littered with improper signage on its shared paths
uᴉʍOꓨ (2024-07-03 00:49:18+00:00): Hi Yudha.  We don't have living streets in the Philippines, though the concept of shared space is not foreign to us.

Unfortunately, the tag "highway=living_street" as documented in the Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dliving_street , requires explicit signage and legal designation to qualify them as "living streets"

Let me know if you have questions or concerns.
recrayon (2024-02-29 03:45:53+00:00): opened an autosave, i do not remember what i did in the save
Xvtn (2024-03-01 16:29:28+00:00): Hi! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes here. I'm not super familiar with bicycle route relations, but from what I can tell everything is good! Perhaps another experienced mapper can chime in to double check me.
Thanks for your contributions!