piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2025-12-15 18:47:27+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Towing service in San Diego"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-12-16 16:49:41+00:00): ❌ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/175992357
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-24 14:04:39+00:00): Cleaned up remaining SEO spam tagging for POI in changeset 184525848

https://osm.org/changeset/184525848
mga_geo (2025-12-16 17:52:29+00:00): Bonsoir,
Les suggestions d'iD (via NSI) ne sont pas toujours à suivre.
Le wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Rennes/Transports_en_commun indique que la valeur correcte est FR:STAR.
Pouvez-vous corriger ?
Merci d'avance
Marc
dartkichaut (2025-12-16 20:35:28+00:00): Bonsoir, 
Désolé je ne savais pas, tout est corrigé !
mga_geo (2025-12-17 05:53:10+00:00): Il reste la relation 5825944
Angelo Giuseppe (2026-01-04 17:15:15+00:00): Fonte survey:d'altra Genesi
Deleted
Taktaal (2026-01-27 21:18:48+00:00): Btw for structured data like what is the key col for what mountain, wikidata is usually the better project. And in this case, Piz Linard already has it listed: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q675543
Harald Hetzner (2026-01-28 15:53:24+00:00): This is what the notes are actually good for. When determining and checking key cols, prominence and parent peaks, such small notes are very helpful to avoid confusion of saddles.
Frans S (2026-01-13 13:35:54+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Did't you notice the number of errors in your work? Many buildings cross a road. Check and correct these errors before you upload your work.
Another issue. You often cluster buildings and tag them as 1 buillding.
Each building need to be mapped individually, without connecting them to eachother with their nodes.
Best regards and keep mapping.
Frans S (2026-01-13 13:41:31+00:00): Check this webpage where I corrected a number of clustered and incorrect mappings.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=177180495
Red lined are your mappings. Yello and green are adjusted.
Best regards
eggie (2025-12-15 19:23:53+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Frans S (2026-02-01 15:17:38+00:00): Hello.
I reviewed this task  to check that the task is correct validated.
A few remarks here.
You did not retag wrongly tagged buildings. Landuse=residential. should be tagged as building =yes
Piece of highway (rather wide) was tagged as path. It should be tagged as unclassified.
This are issues which has to be found and corrected by a validator !
Frans S
Global validater.
NeisBot (2025-12-15 18:47:33+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "IT Dienstleistungen"
---
Zum Beispiel könnte eine neutralere und sachlichere Version deiner Beschreibung lauten: "IT Dienstleistungen"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-12-16 16:49:10+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/175975730
TinPetreković (2025-12-16 10:42:33+00:00): Segments that were split unnecessarily were merged back together in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175998696
silversurfer83 (2025-12-15 19:32:47+00:00): Gude Daniel :)

Du hast darum gebeten, dass sich jemand deine Änderung ansieht.

Erstmal: Schön, dass du dich um deine Firma bei OSM kümmerst. Freut mich.

Dein Eintrag: Sieht auch gut aus. Eine Kleinigkeit nur: Die Telefonnummer sollte im Format "+49 5601 ..." eingetragen sein.

Bei Fragen immer raus damit

silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175973606
Senihtu (2026-01-15 08:59:05+00:00): Hi!
Wenn der Bus Bus 814: Niederhofheim <=> Sulzbach MTZ jetzt über way 1458802965 fährt, dann stimmt da etwas mit den access nicht.
Der track ist motor_vehicle=agricultural.

Kommst Du in der Ecke vorbei und kannst das überprüfen?

Weiter frohes Mappen wünscht
Senihtu
309_308_307 (2026-01-16 01:14:06+00:00): Hallo, die Beschilderung an der Straße ist recht "eigenwillig" (ich hatte darüber schon mal im Forum gepostet) aber im Prinzip ist das kein Feldweg mehr. Ich hab das Tagging deshalb angepasst, hoffentlich passt das so.
Baloo Uriza (2025-12-16 16:07:10+00:00): This node appears in the intersection.  What's the camera mounted on?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175973984
glibbertorsten (2025-12-17 20:06:04+00:00): Hallo. Die Änderungen habe ich erstmal zurückgenommen. Es war zwar das eine Gebäude genauer eingezeichnet, dafür wurden die exisitierenden gelöscht. Wenn dann bitt erichtig und vollständig. Bei Fragen gerne melden.
streckenkundler (2025-12-21 21:10:09+00:00): Guten Abend,
ich bin über https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussions?c=Germany#12/52.3806/13.2856 hierdrauf gestoßen...

An JFFTU Hier bei OSM arbeitest du mit Live-Daten! Änderst du was, ist es defakton sofort in der Datenbank. 
In deinen CS hast du zwar das Gebäude mit den Hausnummern 181 und 183 recht gut lagekorrigiert, aber angrenzende Gebäude offenssichtlich versehentlich gelöscht. Darum der gerechtfertigte Revert von @glibbertorsten; Danke!

Ich versuche mal, mit meinem Mitteln ein Ergebnis aus beidem zu kreieren.

streckenkundler
felipeeugenio (2025-12-15 21:51:07+00:00): Hola. por favor no usar nombres descriptivos.

Cambié el surface a articifial_turf.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175974132
PizzaTreeIsland (2025-12-15 18:52:08+00:00): Hello,
thank you for your edit! Please take your time to write proper changeset comments in the future to make it easier for others to see what you did.
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Thanks and happy mapping!
felipeeugenio (2025-12-15 21:51:36+00:00): Hola. Building es para las estructuras. No para el recinto completo. Ya lo arreglé.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175974316
RafaelCHILE (2025-12-16 20:14:51+00:00): Hola Felipe. Gracias por tu ayuda. 
Soy editor en WAZE Tambien, y en Google Maps. 
Me falta aprender sobre esta plataforma. ¿Hay videos tutoriales?  Saludos 
Rafael
felipeeugenio (2025-12-17 12:34:31+00:00): Hola. Probablemente hay varios videos en Youtube, pero también hay una wiki  (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/). Pero puede ser un poco agobiante al principio. Lo que te recomendamos es que entres al chat de Telegram de la comunidad chilena de maperos. Esto puedes hacer en el siguiente link: https://t.me/OSMcl.

Ahí varios maperos interactuamos todos los días para cualquier duda, no importa si son muy básicas.

Saludos y nos vemos.
felipeeugenio (2025-12-17 12:34:38+00:00): Hola. Probablemente hay varios videos en Youtube, pero también hay una wiki  (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/). Pero puede ser un poco agobiante al principio. Lo que te recomendamos es que entres al chat de Telegram de la comunidad chilena de maperos. Esto puedes hacer en el siguiente link: https://t.me/OSMcl.

Ahí varios maperos interactuamos todos los días para cualquier duda, no importa si son muy básicas.

Saludos y nos vemos.
felipeeugenio (2025-12-15 21:51:54+00:00): =catholic.


Además, por favor cuidar la ortografía.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175974357
eerib (2025-12-15 19:45:53+00:00): Hello Shinsplints,

I am once again reminding you that the trail is signed at both ends as "Newt Trail". You can see photographs of the two signs at the imgur link provided below.

https://imgur.com/a/ESongBN
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-12-16 12:39:08+00:00): Bonjour!

Cela a fait l'objet de discussions (https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/redundancy-of-oneway-yes-for-junction-roundabout/101043/54) et pour conserver la compatibilité avec les anciens engins de routage qui ne prennent pas pour acquis que les roundabout sont à sens unique et pour d'autres raisons, certaines personnes pensent qu'il vaut mieux conserver le tag oneway=yes. Je vous laisse voir si vous voulez faire un revert ou non. Je suis dans le camp du "conserver le tag oneway=yes" pour éviter toute ambiguité, mais je ne vais pas faire le revert moi-même. Merci et bonne journée!
gtalbot (2025-12-21 16:38:02+00:00): Bonjour, 

    Merci pour le commentaire. C’est toujours intéressant d’en apprendre un peu plus sur le monde d’OpenStreetMap.

J’ai lu la discussion et le WIKI sur « junction=roundabout » et ce que j’en retiens est que bien que l’attribut « 'oneway=yes' est implicite et redondant mais, il peut être ajouté comme clarification. » (Citation direct du WIKI)

La discussion sur l’enjeu des engins de routage qui ne prennent pas le « Oneway » comme acquis est un problème inhérent à tous projets « OpenSource » ou le respect des spécifications est à la merci des développeurs, mais il faut ajouter que l’évolution des spécifications dans le temps représente également un défi majeur pour les développeurs et que les spécifications d’OpenStreetMap ont énormément évolués depuis ses débuts.

Dans ce contexte ma position est que « oneway=yes » ne représente pas un problème et ne demande pas à être corrigé.

Je vais donc faire un "revert" de mes modifications qui suivait la recommandation de « Osmose ».

Il faut souligner que la situation va se reproduire tant que « Osmose » va présenter la situation comme une correction à faire et je ne sais pas si quelque chose peut être fait.

Bonne journée
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-12-21 18:57:31+00:00): Excellent merci! Je vais voir sur osmose si on peut désactiver la vérifications.
TinPetreković (2025-12-16 09:55:33+00:00): Reverting because of wrong and unnecessary tags #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175996822
Rogoyski (2026-05-18 20:32:17+00:00): Skąd wziąłeś taki kształt parkingu jak tutaj?
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/937810100
Anas masuris (2026-05-18 20:43:01+00:00): Z orto i wizyty w terenie - z tego, co pamiętam, to tam jest oddzielona kostka brukowa na ukos (analogicznie jak z kształtem klombu/krzewów).

Na geoportalu słabo widać sam krawężnik, ale za to widać tam dodatkowe kreski równoległe do osi jezdni (przy skrajnych miejscach parkingowych)
JakovBušić (2025-12-16 14:43:47+00:00): Hgv restriction that was made in this changeset was replaced with a more relevant one in changeset 176009018
joost schouppe (2026-01-05 14:33:12+00:00): Hoi,
Je hebt hier denk ik deze toegevoegd: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2829764878
Lijkt me op zich juist, maar dubbel met https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1458816376. Die laatste lijkt me verkeerd getagged als amenity=police, aangezien het op basis van de naam om een soort school gaat, en niet "a place that serves as a primary point of contact for the public, i.e. public-facing police facilities" zoals de wiki voor amenity=police beschrijft.
Heb je overigens een idee wat https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2829764873/ nog is?
ZldYe (2026-01-09 19:14:48+00:00): Hey, 
Je hebt gelijk. Ik heb het samengevoegd en er amenity=college van gemaakt. De laatste lijkt om een oefen versie van een hoofdbureau te gaan, dus de naam op het gebouw gezet en amenity verwijderd. Aangezien hier geen echte bureaus zitten. Bedankt!
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2025-12-16 15:23:07+00:00): D400 ilişkilerinin bütünlüğünü bozmuşsunuz. Bkz: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/408362
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15644012

Lütfen D400'den çıkardığınız kısımları tekrar ekleyiniz.
Frans S (2025-12-23 14:46:58+00:00): Hallo Zie mijn DM over dit project.
Hier heb je o.a 2 gebouwen gemist die een node aan een weg hebben gekoppeld en 7 gebouwen met een layer=1 . (Meestal wordt de layer toegevoegd om een fout te verbergen.
Goede toepassingen zijn oa. poorten waar een  weg onderdoor gaat of daken van benzinestations
Kun je deze aanpassen ?
Bedankt.
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2025-12-17 00:31:01+00:00): Merhaba. Ege Bölgesi ilişkisinin(https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2094170) sınırlarını düzenlerken galiba yanlışlıkla bazı öğeleri silmişsiniz. Sildiğiniz öğelerden ötürü, ilişkinin bütünlüğü bozulunca da başka bir OpenStreetMap katkıcısı değişikliğinizi geri almış.

Değişikliğinizden anlaşıldığı kadarıyla Ege Bölgesi'nin kuzeybatısındaki sınırlarının Balıkesir'i kapsayacak şekilde değiştirilmesini öneriyorsunuz. Bu öneriniz doğru ya da yanlış olabilir, bu konuda bilgim yok. Bölge sınırlarını 13 yıl önce çizen kişi de maalesef kaynağını yazmamış.

Değişiklik açıklamanızda yazdığınız soruyu, Türkiye'deki son değişiklikleri inceleyen az sayıdaki kullanıcı haricinde pek fazla kimsenin görmesi olası değil. Dilerseniz, Ege Bölgesi ilişkisinin geçmiş sürümlerini inceleyip, sınırı değiştiren deneyimli OSM katkıcılarına sorabilirsiniz. Onlar daha net bilgi vereceklerdir diye düşünüyorum.

Değişiklik açıklamanızda paylaştığınız siteyi kaynak olarak kullanmayı düşünüyorsanız da bu OSM'nin lisansına aykırı. Kaynak olarak paylaştığınız sitede "Web sitemizdeki tüm Harita ve Atlasların Telif Hakları Ekvator Harita'ya aittir, hiç bir şekilde, basılı, görsel yada internet üzerinde, kaynak göstererek dahi kullanılamaz. " yazıyor. Bu siteden bilgi aktarmak maalesef mümkün değil.

İyi günler.
Frans S (2026-01-09 11:45:30+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Check this footage how to map high buildings correctly.

Check this footage on how to map high buildings: https://youtu.be/dsfUcslLtVc?si=yH6eWDbsb_ILAVb9
Best regards
maro21 (2025-12-15 22:55:10+00:00): We map current state, not future, and we don't map to satisfy one map application. Please restore the routes.
RVR015 (2026-03-19 19:22:42+00:00): Hi Can you give some background on the alt name for this feature: Way History: Boogiewoodro (1082392053)? It contains profanity. Happy Mapping!
eerib (2026-03-24 22:14:56+00:00): Hello RVR015,

This is an unsanctioned mountain bike trail where names that contain profanity are very common.

The original name of this feature was "Boogiewoodro" added by Shinsplints in Changeset #124244777. The name was changed to "Boogie Bitch" by user Donnglet in Changeset #175115952. The name was then changed back to "Boogiewoodro" by Shinsplints in Changeset #130925944. 

I have surveyed this trail and did not find a sign but the am aware that the primary name for this trail is "Boogiewoodro". I added "Boogie Bitch" as an alt_name as that may be what some call it.

I recommend reaching out to user Donnglet for more information on the alt_name.

Cheers, eerib
Cele078 (2025-12-15 22:50:12+00:00): Hi, why did you move the mountain_pass=yes there? It's definitely not the highest point of the road.
Best,
Cele
Harald Hetzner (2025-12-16 17:00:38+00:00): Hi Cele, at the location close to the geographical col, where the pass vertex was located before, the elevation is 1917 m according to the cited data source. The source tends to provide quite accurate data. At the current location of the pass vertex, the elevation is 1937 m. Even closer to the tunnel entrance, the road might be higher, but I cannot rule out that the elevation reading from my source is influenced by the surrounding terrain. Therefore, I would see this change as an attempt of improvement. If you have access to more accurate data or know the elevation profile inside the tunnel, feel free to move the vertex to the de facto highest point of the road.
Harald Hetzner (2025-12-16 18:02:06+00:00): Is this the vertex at 1972 m? 

https://s.geo.admin.ch/rfpqunaneuor

This would mean that it is only about 8 m below terrain level.
Cele078 (2025-12-16 18:35:01+00:00): Yes, that is the correct spot. The tunnel is simply an avalanche gallery. 1972m is measured at the road level.
Harald Hetzner (2025-12-16 18:49:47+00:00): Thanks. Then let's put the vertex there: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176019379
Kinokai (2025-12-15 20:03:26+00:00): Also visible on Google maps street view
kmpoppe_repair (2025-12-15 21:07:09+00:00): DWG Ticket#2025121510000401. Reverting, you will be contacted via the ticket you created.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175978930
NorthCrab_upload (2025-12-15 23:52:08+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13378967996

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
syncronic (2025-12-18 00:04:57+00:00): Hallo,
Ich hab ein Problem mit deinem www.openstreetmap.org/way/1458827286 Ich kenne das und hab bewußt drauf verzichtet, das einzutragen. Ich weiß nicht, ob du wirklich vor Ort warst, oder ob das ein reiner Strava Edit ist. Nicht alles, wo Strava Leute langlaufen, ist ein Weg.
Infinite00 (2025-12-18 11:22:56+00:00): Hi, 
ich werde in einer Woche vor Ort sein und das prüfen. Vorerst nehme ich den Weg erst mal raus.
Danke für den Hinweis!
Ruslan Fatih (2025-12-17 18:45:41+00:00): Зачем вы удалили все данные и заммапили их заново?
maro21 (2025-12-15 22:56:15+00:00): Ta stacja jest nowa, nie widać jej na żadnych zdjęciach lotniczych, a jako źródło podałeś zdjęcia lotnicze sprzed 1,5 roku.
BorStated (2025-12-16 13:31:43+00:00): wiem, zapominam o tych zrodlach, a przypomnialem sobie sekunde po tym jak dodalem heh. Wybacz. Ale stoi tam gdzie podałem, specjalnie tam byłem. Mam zdjęcie jak trzeba
maro21 (2025-12-16 23:49:25+00:00): Spoko
rarad74 (2025-12-16 08:50:36+00:00): Salut. Ai lasat mai multe strazi deconectate. Nu se face treaba asa. Multi utilizatori depind de harta aceasta. Mai multa atentie te rog, sau cere ajutorul. O zi buna.
Lyon-St-Clair (2025-12-16 08:44:02+00:00): Alors désolé mais selon : https://www.montpellier.fr/vie-quotidienne/vivre-ici/urgences-securite-et-prevention/securiser-la-voie-publique/les-aires-pietonnes-de-montpellier

ces rues sont fermées par des barrières pivotantes + panneaux "Zone piétonne". J'ai annulé vos modifications.
Taya_S (2025-12-16 12:01:07+00:00): Reverted vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176002260
felipeeugenio (2025-12-15 21:38:10+00:00): Hola. Las ciclovías estaban incorporadas como vías de la calle. Por lo que eliminé las que agregaste, ya estabas duplicando información.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175978211
mgafMUAT (2025-12-17 15:50:55+00:00): Entendido, pero de esta manera no se muestran en el mapa, como se muestran, por ejemplo, en General Cruz desde Barros Arana
felipeeugenio (2025-12-19 11:19:51+00:00): Hola. Sí, efectivamente, no todo mapeo tiene una representación en el render. Pero las vías que van pegadas a la calle se deben mapear como parte de la calle.

Se pueden eventualmente mapear por separado, pero al ser este un proyecto internacional, algún día, algún mapero, las va a volver a dejar como parte de la calle.
Es por eso que no mapeamos "para el render".

saludos
Gregory Peony (2025-12-16 02:37:12+00:00): Thank you for your contribution! 

The footprints you mapped here envelope multiple buildings and are therefore invalid. It looks like you loosely traced plots and yards. I reverted this changeset.

Each footprint should represent a building. Please watch [this video about imagery interpretation](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJ-vUwtS3A8). Sometimes buildings may appear to share a common wall, but this is sometimes an illusion; only map them with shared nodes if you have reason to believe that they really do touch.

When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom out to obtain the orientation and shape, then zoom in so that you can accurately draw the footprint. Exclude shadows and yards when tracing the footprint. Keep in mind that you are looking at the [roofs of buildings](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape#Roof_shape), but mapping their footprints. Depending on how the scene is lit, pitched roofs may have light and dark sections that belong to one building. Generally pitched roofs overhang the walls of a building, so a footprint slightly smaller than the roof is accurate. You can scale selected features in ID with `shift+(-/+)`, or JOSM with `ctrl.+alt+Lclick & drag`.  Take care to make contributions that others can build upon.

Keep on mapping!

Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
Linus W Frische (2025-12-17 21:17:47+00:00): Hej Aarslev

Jeg kan se at du konsekvent sletter veje, der tilføjes omkring Aarslevgaard. I den seneste tid har du nok oplevet en del ekstra aktivitet med vejene, og det kommer sig af, at der i øjeblikket er iværksat en [kampagne](https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/danmarks-storste-region-arealmaessigt-har-nu-en-maproulette-udfordring-klar-region-midtjylland/138820/4) om at få alle danske adressepunkter inden for 40 meter af en vej, privat eller ej. Isolerede adressepunkter identificeres automatisk, så hver gang du sletter dem bliver de undersøgt igen.

Private veje tagges naturligvis med access=private eller access=no, og sådan har vejene også oftest været tagget, indtil du har slettet dem fuldstændigt. Informationen om at det er private veje, går naturligvis tabt. I dine ændringssæt påstår du at vejene ikke findes, men det er åbenlyst forkert idet

For snart et år siden kontaktede jeg dig privat i OSM og forklarede min andres ageren mht. til vejene på hvad der (antageligt) din grund. Jeg forklarede, at der vil komme andre og tilføje vejene, der åbenlyst mangler, og du har sikkert oplevet at jeg har ret.

Jeg beder dig derfor forklare dit synspunkt i [denne tråd](https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/gendanne-slettede-stier/121953/33) så vi kan komme til en fælles forståelse og enighed i denne strid. 

Hvis du ligesom sidste år ignorerer min besked, føler jeg mig nødsaget til bringe en mediator i spil i form af [OSMs dataarbejdsgruppe](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Data_Working_Group). Dataarbejdsgruppen håndterer vandalisme og stridigheder som denne. Jeg ser helst at vi undgår at tage diskussionen op på et sådant plan, men hvis det er det du ønsker så gør vi bare det. 

Jeg synes at du skal læse beskeden fra sidste år igen, og derefter deltage i tråden jeg nævnte ovenfor. Jeg garanterer at du vil blive behandlet ordentligt og med respekt. Hvis ikke du stempler ind i tråden, kontakter jeg dataarbejdsgruppen og beder om medierering d. 17 januar 2026.

Håber at høre fra dig!
Glædelig jul og godt nytår fra Linus
TinPetreković (2025-12-24 12:32:54+00:00): Roads were merged back together and tagged accordingly in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176360209
Frank Peng (2025-12-16 01:30:32+00:00): Please don't use Google Maps as a source when editing OSM. Google Maps is copyrighted, and the license is not compatible.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#Why_don't_you_just_use_Google_Maps/whoever_for_your_data?
Frank Peng (2025-12-16 01:31:15+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#Why_don't_you_just_use_Google_Maps/whoever_for_your_data?