piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Yunan973 (2026-04-05 12:07:19+00:00): Bonjour,

ta relation n'est pas une relation public_transport, elle contient des éléments qui ne devraient pas y être et les rôles que tu as mis (outer, inner et autres) ne sont pas pas autorisés, voir le wiki pour plus de détails https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:public_transport%3Dstop_area.

Ce type de relations a été approuvé (tu peux le voir sur la page wiki sur la droite), ce qui veut dire que tu ne peux pas modifier ses caractéristiques.

Ta relation s'apparente plus à une relation de type site : je ne l'ai pas corrigée, je te laisse le faire dans le sens qui te contient le mieux (la transformer en site ou la modifier pour qu'elle soit une vraie relation public_transport).

Je n'ai pas vérifié tes autres modifications récentes, mais j'ai l'impression que d'autres relations sont à reprendre.
NeisBot (2026-04-03 09:36:14+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your changesets and noticed that the cumulative count of your recent edits (3 changesets) shows that 414 of your last 457 changes were deletions. This is quite an unusual proportion, so I wanted to check with you.

Could you please confirm whether these deletions were intentional or if they may have occurred by mistake?

#DeletionsCheck #Cumulative
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?uid=15282310
Dimitar155 (2026-04-03 15:57:32+00:00): Здравейте и благодаря за промяната!

Сигурна ли сте че улицата се казва Детелина? Питам понеже в кадастъра четирите къщи, които се намират северно от улицата, са с адреси на ул. Лилия (с номера от запад на изток съответно 2В, 2Б, 2А и 2).

Поздрави,
Митко
Todorova (2026-04-03 16:34:11+00:00): Да.  Имам обяснение и от кадастъра, че изписването на улица Лилия, не се отнася за имотите с номера 2А, 2Б и 2В. т.е. името на улицата е Детелина.
Поздрави и от мен.
Andrea Musuruane (2026-04-04 11:23:15+00:00): Ciao. Meglio usare (anche) Strava per rivedere i percorsi escursionistici. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180803241
Stephen Dawkins (2026-04-05 18:40:57+00:00): The source for this should be Arun District Council Tax Records not Adur.
NeisBot (2026-04-03 10:18:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/10844665140 v4

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Roofing company"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-11 10:33:17+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181182953
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
❤️‍🔥 (2026-04-08 10:13:42+00:00): hi, i'm not sure if "driveway" is correct for these shared alleyways which are effectively open to the public 

i believe the consensus in AU is to use service=pipestem. there are two other good suggestions if you click the link
NeisBot (2026-04-03 10:27:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13703245698 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Auto body shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-11 10:33:22+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181182956
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
NeisBot (2026-04-03 10:30:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13703245698 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Auto body shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-04-11 10:33:25+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/181182956
Stephen Dawkins (2026-04-05 18:39:56+00:00): The source for this should be Arun District Council, not Adur.
AndyB_66 (2026-04-03 11:16:03+00:00): "Drobne poprawki" czy "aktualizacja terenu" to nie jest dobry opis zestawu zmian - patrz tu: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
joost schouppe (2026-04-27 14:07:56+00:00): Dag Biros,
Ik weet niet goed wat je bedoeling hier was, maar het gevolg van je aanpassing was: twee ziekenhuizen waar er in werkelijkheid maar één is. TTZ, AZ Diest bestaat uit een site die recent uitgebreid werd. Beide delen sluiten enkel met een voetgangersbrug op elkaar aan, en worden door het hospitaal als één geheel beschouwd. Stel dat er hier wel degelijk twee ziekenhuizen zouden zijn, dan horen de details van het ziekenhuis nog altijd op het geel gemarkeerde gebied, de hele site.
Ik heb dit teruggedraaid, maar wel nog het adres ook op de hoofdingang gezet.
Biros Vondenbirre (2026-04-30 13:12:20+00:00): Hallo Joost, merci, dat was inderdaad niet de bedoeling. AZ Diest bestaat uit één campus één ziekenhuis nu. Ik werk voor het ziekenhuis en het doel van mijn aanpassing was om het hoofdadres "Statiestraat 65" op het nieuwbouwgedeelte te krijgen. Dit stond enkele weken geleden nog fout. Het grotere doel is om Google maps te beïnvloeden hiermee. Zij pinnen "Statiestraat 65" of "AZ Diest" nog op de oude gebouwen met het gevolg dat heel veel patiënten via de Michel Theysstraat geleid worden. Deze ingang is sinds kort zelfs volledig gesloten...
joost schouppe (2026-04-30 13:39:04+00:00): Goh, er zijn geruchten dat Google Maps OSM wat in de gaten houdt, maar dat is zeker niet systematisch voor alle aanpassingen. Ik neem aan dat je op Maps zelf al een melding/voorstel voor aanpassing hebt gedaan.
NeisBot (2026-04-03 10:48:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13703281605 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Oto Galerisi"
---
Örneğin metnin daha tarafsız ve gerçek bir versiyonu şöyle olabilir: "Oto Galerisi"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-11 16:33:04+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181198166
(Delete spam tags. First version)
AndyB_66 (2026-04-03 11:14:39+00:00): To nie jest dobry opis zestawu zmian - patrz tu: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
VisibleSouth (2026-04-03 13:28:53+00:00): There is no motorway, no trash please.
IvanaŠokčević (2026-04-13 14:33:20+00:00): Changed tag on Island Road from hgv=no to hgv=delivery based on streetside footage; fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181262451 #OptimoRoute
NeisBot (2026-04-03 11:12:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13703283380 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Zahnarztpraxis"
---
Zum Beispiel könnte eine neutralere und sachlichere Version deines Textes lauten: "Zahnarztpraxis"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-04-11 16:33:08+00:00): 👍 Thank you for removing the text by https://osm.org/changeset/180807495
SomeoneElse (2026-04-04 10:23:51+00:00): It looks like you've deleted the Cotswolds just in time for Easter! :)
Currently it's no longer a valid multipolygon since https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1013226614/history and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1013226612/history are partial duplications around https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9347863538/history .
I guess that this is a "work in progress" so we'll wait for it to reappear.
VictorIE (2026-04-06 01:25:17+00:00): Hi,

I've added some details around Maolchnoc and a bunch of nearby estates over the last week.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1495819283/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1496810572/history

This building is made up of duplex-style apartments, with terraces at first floor level, meaning the overall shape of the building is rectangular, with only the entrance stairs sticking out. :)

Thanks for mapping the buildings - it drives me bananas sometimes, especially when it comes to the randomness of garden sheds.
VictorIE (2026-04-06 01:28:04+00:00): https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=53.2759918&lon=-9.1166964&zoom=20&camera.theta=39.778&camera.phi=56.207
wavewings (2026-04-06 07:34:48+00:00): That's a nice 3D model of it :)

The building type reminds me of some of the ones around here
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1357570653/

With garden sheds if they're in a corner/shady part of a garden they can sometimes be difficult to tell apart from oil tanks.
VictorIE (2026-04-06 08:05:12+00:00): Thank you. :)

They're surprisingly similar to the Cheerywood ones - usually the stairs is within the rectangle of the main building footprint.
Brummelwuff (2026-04-07 07:08:13+00:00): Moin, wenn die Straße freigegeben ist sollten auch die nicht mehr Zutreffenden access-Tags entfernt werden.
NeisBot (2026-04-03 11:36:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13703284819 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Custom kitchen showroom"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-11 16:33:12+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181198170
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
IvaKraljić (2026-04-03 13:46:23+00:00): The wrong tag has since been fixed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180812932. #OptimoRoute
IvaKraljić (2026-04-03 13:48:03+00:00): The wrong tag has since been fixed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180813048. #OptimoRoute
IvaKraljić (2026-04-03 13:51:34+00:00): The wrong tag has since been fixed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180813247. #OptimoRoute
IvaKraljić (2026-04-03 13:54:38+00:00): The wrong tag has since been fixed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180813435. #OptimoRoute
IvaKraljić (2026-04-03 13:56:04+00:00): The wrong tag has since been fixed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180813514. #OptimoRoute
ajmat (2026-04-04 14:03:38+00:00): Partially Revert of 180763934
pavelito (2026-04-06 14:50:18+00:00): Hello, ajmat! Thank you for adding additional information to my comment. Best regards, Pavel.
eggie (2026-04-03 12:39:05+00:00): Hoi,

Het incomplete adres heb ik wel weer verwijderd. Er zijn adresnodes.
MVG
eggie
ETim75 (2026-04-05 09:49:20+00:00): 👍🏻
IvaKraljić (2026-04-04 08:34:37+00:00): The wrong tag has since been fixed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180842226. #OptimoRoute
IvaKraljić (2026-04-04 08:35:31+00:00): The wrong tag has since been fixed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180842268#map=18/40.486758/-74.448286. #OptimoRoute
NeisBot (2026-04-03 11:56:26+00:00): 🌍 Bienvenue sur OSM, tiana_fitia.
Merci de contribuer !

Pour faciliter la collaboration et aider les autres à comprendre tes modifications, il est préférable d'ajouter une courte description des changements que tu as effectués. Des commentaires clairs aident la communauté à suivre ton travail et à fournir des retours plus précis. Tu peux trouver des conseils pour écrire de bons commentaires ici[1].

✅ Voici un exemple de commentaire basé sur tes modifications de carte : "Ajout de bâtiments, de chemins, d'aire de loisirs et de surfaces non revêtues, suppression des désignations de routes résidentielles et de pistes"
(Auto-translation)
---
🌍 Welcome to OSM, tiana_fitia.
Thanks for contributing!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

✅ Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added buildings, pathways, leisure pitch, and unpaved surfaces, removed residential and track road designations"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment
IvaKraljić (2026-04-03 13:43:09+00:00): The wrong tag has since been fixed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180812764. #OptimoRoute
IvaKraljić (2026-04-03 13:39:27+00:00): The wrong tag has since been fixed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180812584. #OptimoRoute
monxton (2026-04-12 22:58:48+00:00): Hi @sprutton. Thanks for editing OSM. Could you please give me some background about the named viewpoints you have added on St Giles Hill Park? I walked round them all today. The main viewpoint is signposted, but the other three you have given names to - St Catherine's, Beech and St Giles Hill Lower - there was nothing on the ground to indicate that they had these names. Is there any source for them that you can point me to?
NeisBot (2026-04-03 12:18:41+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 28 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1495828830 v1 | 21 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1495828829 v1 | 7 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180808574
NeisReview (2026-04-11 16:33:49+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/180967917
NeisBot (2026-04-03 12:21:41+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 16 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1495827671 v3 | 16 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180808657
NeisReview (2026-04-11 16:33:50+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/180809159
Bondi Maps (2026-04-03 13:56:45+00:00): Voy a tener que revertirte el cambio porque la 37 no hace eso
limes11 (2026-04-03 21:14:49+00:00): Hallo,

bitte keine Verweise auf google maps und keinerlei Daten von dort übernehmen. 

Befindet sich hier die freiwillige Feuerwehr ?
limes11 (2026-04-19 13:15:11+00:00): Hallo erneut, 

hier ist ein Bauhof, vor Ort kein Hinweis auf eine freiwillige Feuerwehr. 

Ich entferne das wieder.

Viele Grüße
eggie (2026-04-03 13:46:41+00:00): Top!
NeisBot (2026-04-03 13:03:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13703529628 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Cargo office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-11 16:33:15+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181198173
(Delete spam tags. First version)
fluffypileofpigeon (2026-05-17 11:17:09+00:00): Hey! I noticed that you moved "Natural Terra" in Mitaka in this change set to another location. I wonder if this was a mistake?
The node is: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13607266763
NeisBot (2026-04-03 13:24:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 22 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1369185241 v3 | 11 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1085839379 v7 | 11 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/12681241430 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180811732
iandees (2026-04-03 15:04:52+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12681241430 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180816949, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
ivanbranco (2026-04-03 15:14:17+00:00): Ciao, operator=BBQ significa che quei cartelloni publicizzano questo evento? https://bbqexpo.it/

In tal caso imho è sbagliato, perchè 1. l'operatore è l'azienda pubblicitaria suppongo 2. non mappiamo eventi temporanei. Immagina aggiornare il cartellone ad ogni nuova pubblicità, non sarebbe fattibili.

in ogni caso benvenuto su OSM e buon mapping!
IvaKraljić (2026-04-03 13:25:32+00:00): The wrong tags have since been fixed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180811857#map=18/40.499698/-74.458280. #OptimoRoute
eggie (2026-04-03 13:45:28+00:00): reverted by changeset #180812816

This is not correct.
The name=  belongs to the waterway and that is the fact here.
Gr eggie
kingkingHK (2026-04-03 14:02:41+00:00): 1. Does https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/110853514 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/110853513really have physical channelisation? (Yes I am aware you didn't add them, but seeing you modified them I think you kind of have a responsibility in making sure they are correct)
2. Does https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1495851539 really have physical channelisation?
2.
vectorial8192 (2026-04-04 15:32:21+00:00): Re "1"; obviously, both do not have physical separation/channelization. But then the current situation is very ancient to begin with, and may be improved as a separate changeset. I did have to check and confirm it was not me doing them.

Re "2", I imagine/believe the rules are relaxed for single-destination "end of road" channelizations, Also, the road usage markings (as in "the dark patches of asphalt that are not used by any traffic at all") indeed suggest a bit of implicit channelization.

-------

Side note:

For minor issues (e.g. "1"), just do it:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Foundation/Core_Values

> Do-ocracy. [...]

If you find out an obvious minor issue, just do it. You can keep reviewing and commentating changesets, but when you seemingly often ask about the small things, it makes your intent unclear. Also, nowadays I often can't immediately answer, and then we are just wasting time waiting for exchanges and responses.

Specifically for this case, I can use the "while we are here, might as well also do it" argument to convince myself to also handle the questionable bus lanes, but that's never a hard obligation. Over the years I find this argument very harmful to sanity since there's always something more to improve, but obviously we aren't supposed to put literally "all" of our time on OSM.
kingkingHK (2026-04-06 08:58:42+00:00): 2. Well, asphalt colours are obviously not a physical barrier.

------

I do sometimes notice myself commenting on minor stuff too often. To clarify, my workflow is check recent changesets/look around the map -> notice something wrong -> checks who made it -> fix if likely to be mistake (e.g. made by new mapper, or obviously wrong) or comment if potentially controversial (e.g. made by you or Kovoschiz, or only borderline wrong). I am aware that the inevitable consequence of this workflow is that you will get lots of comments, simply because you make so many changesets (over 15% of all changesets in HK!), have a trust-worthy history (so I am more cautious in simply reverting/fixing, just in case you did it for a reason), and you do not really "specialise" on anything (compared to other mappers) so naturally there is a higher variety of mistakes to comment on. I have also noticed that my language is becoming more direct/blunt, which may be perceived as rude and thus exacerbate the issue. (Not to shift the blame, but I think this is partially influenced by you and Kovoschiz.)

I also admit that I comment more than I map simply because commenting is easier than mapping.

I have only continued to comment as such because you keep replying promptly and at length, which I took as a sign that you tolerate my comments. I sincerely apologise if this misunderstanding annoyed or disturbed you. I will certainly keep this discussion in mind in the future and refrain from excessive questioning. Tbh I have also noticed that my time spent on discussing stuff (whether in changeset comments or on Discord) is inversely proportional to my motivation to map. Maybe shutting myself up would be better for both of us.

Ultimately, we are just here to improve the map. As you said somewhere else, it would be dumb if we kill participation in our quest for purity.