piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
FajrAl (2026-07-10 09:54:29+00:00): when road crosses the river, do not tag them as culvert, instead, tag them as ford=yes
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-21 05:04:14+00:00): SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more information.

Reverted adding SEO spam POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags/values in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/186095801
Jakka (2026-06-04 12:01:18+00:00): dit staat ingetekend of is het nog een ander ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1466040685
Krimor (2026-06-04 17:43:15+00:00): De volle rode lijn is het bewuste wegeltje. Het kwam maar tot de achterkant van de tuinen, maar loopt wel degelijk tussen 2 opritten door tot de Motsenstraat. Als het bordje er niet stond, zou je er zo voorbij lopen.
Ik heb de aanpassing zelf gedaan.
vasony (2026-06-06 15:30:45+00:00): Szia!

Honnan van ez a cím? Orlen oldalán nincs ennek nyoma. És sehol máshol sincs nyoma Gödöllő, Szent Jakab útnak.

Tamás
Biofilter (2026-06-08 07:13:20+00:00): Szia, a cégem végez ott szolgáltatást, innen tudjuk, hogy Orlen kút, hivatalosan hrsz-es címe van,de azt sajnos az penstreetmap nem találja meg. Ahogy atérképen is láthatod tényleg ott van egy páros Orlen kút.
vasony (2026-06-08 18:26:45+00:00): Szia! 

Jobban megnézve a fő gond az volt itt, hogy ez közigazgatásilag nem Gödöllő hanem Mogyoród, hiába nevezi magát gödöllői benzinkútnak.
Mogyoródon viszont van Szent Jakab út ahogy a térképen is látszik, így nem lesz gond az utcával. 
A települést javítottam.

Tamás
BCNorwich (2026-06-04 11:47:29+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The fact that a path is private and behind a fence is not grounds to delete it. The path can be seen on imagery and thus verified. The fence and gates would prohibit public access and indicate only private access. 

I've reinstated the paths.

Regards Bernard.
aq123 (2026-07-22 12:15:32+00:00): - Duplicate amenity tags were created
- The only amenity=college tag was deleted
- POI history was deleted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186174398
mavl (2026-06-11 03:02:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183950204 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20791].
danieldegroot2 (2026-06-24 12:17:00+00:00): Angļu valodas teksts zemāk / English below

Sveiki, Vizma un Artūrs,

Esmu pievienojis aprakstu angļu valodā ar dažām detaļām.
Tāpat esmu mainījis materiālu no betona uz koksni. Platforma ir no koka, bet zem tās esošā caurule ir no betona.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element

Lai gan esmu pārliecināts, ka to pievienot prezentācijas laikā konferencē „SotM Baltics 2026“ būs diezgan satraucoši.

Izmaiņas veiktas
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184520715

Izmaiņas var redzēt vizuāli šeit:
https://osmcha.org/changesets/184520715

Ar cieņu,

Daniel

---

Hey Vizma and Artūrs,

Added english description with some details.
Also changed the material from concrete to wood. The platform is wood, the culvert below it is concrete.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element

though I am sure it is nerves of adding this while presenting at SotM Baltics 2026.

Modified in
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184520715

You can see changes visually at
https://osmcha.org/changesets/184520715

Regards,

Daniel
danieldegroot2 (2026-06-24 12:18:17+00:00): PS: Es izveidoju problēmas ziņojumu GitHub repozitorijā, kas veltīts piena kannu statīvu kartēm. Vai varētu to, lūdzu, apskatīt? /
I opened an issue on the milk churn stand map GitHub repository. Could you take a look, please?

https://github.com/APizich/piena-galdi/issues/1
danieldegroot2 (2026-06-28 18:57:01+00:00): Thank you for taking time to look at issue nr. 2. First issue could use your feedback. Also I have since opened multiple other issues, some bugs and some feature requests.

Happy mapping :-)
danieldegroot2 (2026-07-04 15:42:24+00:00): In the future, make sure wikimedia commons is copied from file title which is without underscores. The value does not require any underscores in this case. Also copying from URL in some cases will change special characters to '%...' or similar html code which may not always be valid link when processed on osm.org website.

Thank you for taking time to look at the GitHub issues.
silversurfer83 (2026-06-05 17:20:15+00:00): Hi

guck mal in der Eigenschaftenliste. Da siehts du, dass ein disused=yes noch in der Datenbank steht. Sonst gut :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183641714
AndyB_66 (2026-06-07 19:52:39+00:00): Stosuj się, proszę, do zasad komentowania zestawów nazw: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
Muhmaker (2026-07-18 09:12:27+00:00): Hallo vanagaudi. Mir sind deine Umbauarbeiten am Busbahnhof am Kempener Bahnhof aufgefallen. Dabei habe ich festgestellt, dass du für viele flächige Objekte ein Multipolygon erzeugt hast. Ich möchte eigentlich nur wissen ob das eine bewusste Entscheidung war oder ob dir der iD-Editor dort einen Streich gespielt hat. Bis auf die Rasenfläche wären meiner Meinung nach dort eigentlich keine Multipolygone nötig und die Objekte könnten mit einfachen geschlossenen Polygonen dargestellt werden. Das würde es weniger erfahrenen Mappern leichter machen dort in Zukunft etwas zu editieren falls es irgendwann mal nötig sein sollte. Gruss, Muhmaker
vanagaudi (2026-07-21 14:38:51+00:00): Hallo,

vielen Dank für deinen Hinweis. Mir ist aufgefallen, dass bei Flächenprüfungen erstaunlich wenige Fehler auftreten, wenn die Flächen aus verketteten Linienzügen (also Multipolygonen) bestehen. Tatsächlich betreffen etwa 70 % der gefundenen Flächenfehler Polygone, die mit einem einzigen Linienzug gebildet wurden. Hier liegt die Ursache oft darin, dass versucht wurde, komplexe Flächen mit einfachen Polygonen darzustellen – obwohl Multipolygone die bessere Wahl wären.

Ich kann daher der Annahme nicht zustimmen, dass neue Mitwirkende bei der Bearbeitung von Flächenbeschreibungen mit Multipolygonen eine höhere Fehlerquote aufweisen würden als bei einfachen Polygonen. Vielmehr scheint es, dass oft das Grundverständnis für die Einschränkungen jeder Art von Polygonen fehlt. Aus diesem Grund wäre es sinnvoll, wenn neue Mitwirkende frühzeitig auch mit einfachen, kleinen Multipolygonen in Kontakt kommen. So könnten sie Schritt für Schritt erlernen, dass eine Eigenschaft nicht nur einem einzelnen Linienzug zugewiesen werden kann, sondern dass sich mehrere Linienzüge eine Eigenschaft über eine Relation teilen können.

Interessanterweise wird die Verwendung von Linienrelationen (z. B. ÖPNV-Linien oder Bundesstraßen mit Hunderten von Knoten) von niemandem infrage gestellt. Gleichzeitig traut man Anfängern aber nicht zu, mit Relationen umzugehen, die vielleicht nur zwei Dutzend Knoten umfassen – und das nur, weil sie eine Fläche beschreiben.

Wenn ich echte Multipolygon-Fehler finde, handelt es sich meist um falsch benannte Außen- oder Innenringe. Unvollständige Ringe kommen fast ausschließlich bei Boundaries vor, wenn ein Teilstück gelöscht, die Relation aber nicht aktualisiert wurde. Solche Fehler lassen sich in der Regel leicht beheben. Problematischer wird es, wenn eine Boundary als eigener Linienzug existiert, der im Editor kaum sichtbar ist und dann – aus Unwissenheit – zusammen mit anderen Linienzügen und Knoten verschoben wird. Das führt mitunter zu unplausiblen Grenzverläufen.

Ich plädiere dafür, neue Mitwirkende bewusst mit Multipolygonen vertraut zu machen, anstatt diese Methode gänzlich zu vermeiden. So können sie von Anfang an erlernen, wie man verschachtelte Flächen effizient abbildet.

Viele Grüße, vanagaudi
SomeoneElse (2026-06-11 14:30:39+00:00): Just for info, I've filled in a couple of gaps in http://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeRelation?relationId=17295022 here...
squeaker_andrus (2026-06-12 07:09:49+00:00): Hello, SomeoneElse2! Thanks for your addition to the map.
Have a nice day and happy mapping, squeaker_andrus
HellMap (2026-06-05 09:49:07+00:00): Hello,

I wanted to clarify what did you intend to map when adding multiple bicycle parking nodes right next to each other? You have currently mapped 72 bike racks/stands - 9 parking locations with 8 stands each. Did you mean to map individual racks here? Normally, only one node for parking is mapped (it can be an area for larger locations).
maemolol (2026-06-18 14:48:36+00:00): hi, sorry for the nearly 2-week wait. yes, i did indeed mean to map individual racks
HellMap (2026-06-19 11:52:58+00:00): Unfortunately OSM doesn't really have established tags for individual bicycle parking features (not like amenity=parking and amenity=parking_space), so these shouldn't currently be separately mapped. Otherwise data consumers cannot distinguish "individual" elements, so they would show 9 bicycle locations (in search, in navigation, etc.).
Metzor (2026-07-04 07:08:10+00:00): Hallo testman

Du hast hier 2 Knoten ohne Merkmale (Tags) eingefügt. Was wolltest du erreichen?

Schöne Grüße
Metzor
NorthCrab_upload (2026-06-04 23:23:05+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/264940105

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-06-04 23:53:00+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/264940105

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
mavl (2026-06-11 03:02:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183950204 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20791].
mavl (2026-06-05 13:26:50+00:00): Здравствуйте. Вы немного испортили карту (например, забор не может идти прямо по дороге). Ваши изменения отменены.
mavl (2026-06-11 03:02:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183950204 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20791].
mavl (2026-06-11 03:02:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183950204 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20791].
mavl (2026-06-11 03:02:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183950204 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20791].
zuicz (2026-06-17 14:12:53+00:00): zniknęła stacja Rybnik z S75
adamos (2026-06-17 14:25:17+00:00): thank you, fixed now.
JamJar II (2026-06-04 12:35:01+00:00): Source: aerial imagery
SPLATPLAYS (2026-06-04 12:54:50+00:00): https://names-report.pages.dev/australia/western-australia
confusedbuffalo (2026-06-04 15:16:02+00:00): Hi, most of these are good changes, but please consider the changes and don't just click fix on everything. I've seen a few suspicious items here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4583455900 looks like two languages in name:en
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11634664227 looks like bad data in the first place
Likewise https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11634175917
And https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/387453131
Also https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1251569606
SPLATPLAYS (2026-06-04 16:13:28+00:00): Sorry, I fixed the other language in https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4583455900
SPLATPLAYS (2026-06-04 16:26:22+00:00): For this I changed the locality tag to a man_made=works tag https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11634664227
SPLATPLAYS (2026-06-04 16:31:26+00:00): I don't really know what to do with this https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1251569606
confusedbuffalo (2026-06-05 09:47:40+00:00): The the saw mill and so on, they are quite descriptive names, which shouldn't really be the name, but I have no idea from here what the actual name should be. Thanks for fixing the other ones
SPLATPLAYS (2026-06-05 10:59:20+00:00): No problems, Its work that people like you reviewing changesets that really make osm work : )
MarcoR (2026-06-04 17:20:09+00:00): Come mai hai rimosso un fossato (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/165849525/history/3
) lungo la ferrovia? Quello scolo esiste (anche se col caldo tende a seccarsi) e serve a drenare l'acqua dalla massicciata della ferrovia.

Inoltre, hai di nuovo re-impostato Via Torino, Via degli Etruschi, Via Sicialia, etc. come residential ma non lo sono. Era intervenuto anche un altro mappatore di TomTom ma non sembra importarti.

Hai provato a leggere le pagine della wiki che ti avevo scritto nell'altro changeset? Sono https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Tag:highway%3Dresidential e https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Tag:highway%3Dunclassified

La pagina in inglese di highway=residential riporta: "The highway=residential tag is used on roads within residential areas, or providing access to them. While these roads typically allow through traffic, they are not normally used as through routes. "

Ti sembra che quelle vie che hai impostato su highway=residential siano utilizzate solo per l'accesso alle residenze? A me pare che vengano usate da mezza Livorno per attraversare la città per non passare dalla Variante o dall'Aurelia o ancora peggio dal mare.

Un'altra cosa: per favore usa un commento ai tuoi changeset più significativo perché "Varie" non dice molto. Non è obbligatorio e non sei l'unico ad usare commenti vaghi ma OpenStreetMap è un progetto collaborativo ed aiuterebbe gli altri mappatori a capire cosa avevi in mente di fare quando hai fatto certe modifiche.

Buon mapping,
Marco
Leo Slager (2026-06-06 23:37:10+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Leo Slager (2026-06-06 23:39:56+00:00): Hallo Kruuzer10,

Alleen een naam is wat weinig informatie.
Kun je ook aangeven wat voor soort bedrijf het is ?
JochenOSM (2026-06-06 09:13:30+00:00): Hallo Disco4, an dem Häuschen steht viel, aber nicht "Ticketverkauf Flussrundfahrt". So kann es daher nicht bleiben, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen#name_ist_nur_der_Name
JochenOSM (2026-06-18 14:53:02+00:00): Da keine Reaktion: revert mit Change 184275476
mavl (2026-06-11 03:02:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183950204 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20791].
Nadja15 (2026-06-04 13:18:27+00:00): Se: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2797906
dvd777 (2026-06-04 13:25:27+00:00): Really good coffee!
ivanbranco (2026-06-04 14:06:51+00:00): Based on socials, it should be an amenity=cafe. shop=coffee is for place where coffee is sold (beams or pods), not served.
7tonin (2026-06-04 18:19:33+00:00): Bonjour,
1- l'emprise de votre groupe de modification me semble trop grande. Pour vos trois modifications, vous auriez dû faire trois enregistrements séparés.
2- La détection d'une piste agricole me parait erronée, il y en aurait plutôt deux distinctes et disjointes. Vous auriez mélangé pistes et clôtures. https://osm.org/way/1526114272
ssundell (2026-06-27 20:34:58+00:00): Nämä tagaukset ovat vähän erikoisia. Miksi `bicycle=dismount`? Eikö venerantaan saa ajaa pyörällä? Miksi `horse=permit`, keneltä lupa pitää kysyä? Miten nämä suhtautuvat siihen, että sekä jalankulkija että moottoriajoneuvolla ajo on sallittua vain asiakkaille? Ketkä ovat venesataman asiakkaita?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183646259
Sakari_N (2026-07-23 14:24:40+00:00): Poistin viholanrannasta parking:left=no ja parking:right=shoulder tagit, toisella puolella ei ole pysäköintikieltoa ja toisella puolella ei ole erillistä piennarkaistaa jota "shoulder" arvo kuvaa.
Oregonian3 (2026-06-04 13:41:56+00:00): ...and I believe that wraps up a multi-month first pass across all of Oregon to fix up road classifications! I certainly didn't get it all right and open to any changes that people have, but should be in a much better shape than before.
Yog Sot (2026-06-04 22:00:13+00:00): tak troche niedokłądnie ustawiasz private, bo w obszarze drogi publicznej nie powinienes, a destination, to tez nie jestem pewien dlaczego, przeciez daje sie tylko jak jest konkretny znak drogowy
JassKurn (2026-06-04 14:01:27+00:00): See discussion in    changeset/183612881   and   changeset/174204545
FDMS4 (2026-06-06 17:37:58+00:00): Hallo, befindet sich hier ein Gebäude oder sonstige Einrichtung?
rhhs (2026-07-25 15:04:20+00:00): Hi, Thanks for adding this. Is this the marker of the start of the Camino Bulgaria, like in this picture https://caminobg.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/IMG_0883.jpg ? I've been asked to add all 13 to the map, and I don't want to add a duplicate
teodora_koleva (2026-07-31 12:56:48+00:00): Hello! Thank you for the comment! Yes, that's exactly it. However, I am not really sure whether this is the most appropriate tag for this marker. If you have any other recommendations, please share, I will be happy to discuss.
rhhs (2026-07-31 13:05:10+00:00): Thanks for your reply. I will give it the same tags as the others, then. It's not really a milestone (they are not placed at regular distances) but a trail marker. I moved the text in name= to inscription=Созопол 0.00 км (it' not really a name of the stone)
teodora_koleva (2026-07-31 13:10:17+00:00): Great! Thank you for the edits!
Baloo Uriza (2026-06-09 12:52:30+00:00): Uuh, not sure why you did that since East is definitely part of the street name.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183648217
Katya Shastak (2026-06-09 14:00:09+00:00): Hi Baloo Uriza! Thanks for the comment.
My change was based on Bing Streetside imagery, where the street signs didn't seem to include 'East.' However, if you have local knowledge and are sure it’s part of the official name, I appreciate you pointing it out! Please feel free to update it, or let me know if I should revert the change.
Best, Katya
Baloo Uriza (2026-06-09 20:25:26+00:00): Already got it.  It's probably worth knowing that incomplete, incorrect or just inconsistent signage is the norm around Oklahoma.
Katya Shastak (2026-06-09 20:45:47+00:00): Thanks, I'll keep it in mind for future edits.
Have a great day!
JassKurn (2026-06-04 14:08:35+00:00): See discussion in changeset/183612881 and changeset/174204545
eteb3 (2026-06-04 14:43:39+00:00): Note made on CoMaps edit but not incorporated into tags by CoMaps app:

"Source:mosque = official Register of Places of Worship confirmed by multiple press reports
Source: address= register of places of worship, confirmed by planning docs Reading PL/21/0537"
OSM snapshot date: 2026-04-21T18:14:47Z
POI name: Al-Majid Centre
POI types: amenity-place_of_worship-muslim
#CoMaps ios 2026.04.23-19-ios
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-06-10 18:58:04+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13909879976/history - skąd pomysł że jest tutaj teraz stacja kolejowa?
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-06-10 19:00:35+00:00): obstawiam że https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenHistoricalMap może cię zainteresować
savsk (2026-06-18 17:29:04+00:00): nie oznaczaj proszę w taki sposób stacji które już nie istnieją, to jest informacja wprowadzająca w błąd
NorthCrab_upload (2026-06-04 23:53:05+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/331451447

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Nekoatthegates (2026-06-08 15:18:58+00:00): Correction: Source used was Esri World Imagery.
gscholz (2026-06-10 07:10:39+00:00): Hi geosphere01,
your latest edits have created several errors regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=35.69467&lat=-6.21373&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges

As you may know, this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps.

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Fraxi (2026-06-04 15:39:13+00:00): Здравей! Този мемориал(https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7892517418) вътре в храма ли се намира? Защото ако е някъде по стената, може би е добре точката да се закачи за сградата. Виж какво се получава визуално на рендера...
Fraxi (2026-06-04 15:40:27+00:00): При максимално увеличение(20 м) имената сякаш се сливат и се отличават само по цвят.
plamen (2026-06-05 18:34:42+00:00): Отвън. Виж Уикипедия. Има снимка File:Парашкева Николов паметник.jpg - Wikimedia Commons https://share.google/RiW375OZGvj4bc1mT
MapmakerrrJohn (2026-06-04 16:49:48+00:00): You should of made 3 separate changesets instead of this geographically large changeset.
hwierzbicki (2026-06-04 17:01:34+00:00): Hey John, thanks for the comment. Not purposeful - unfortunately CoMaps doesn't give editors much control about when a changeset is submitted.
qstep (2026-06-04 14:50:28+00:00): Üdv az OSM-en! Explicite ki van táblázva, hogy lóval tilos használni az ösvényt? Ha nincs, akkor felesleges megadni, mert ez az alapértelmezett. További jó térképezést!
qxmd (2026-06-05 07:59:16+00:00): Szia!
Kitáblázva nincsen, de maga az ösvény nem szélesebb egy vadcsapásnál.
Este javítom :)
És köszönöm a jelzést!
NorthCrab_upload (2026-06-04 23:23:17+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/291314393

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-06-04 23:53:03+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/291314393

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
evgenykatyshev (2026-06-05 11:26:31+00:00): Empty nodes, like in two other changesets
MenKauRa (2026-06-05 11:38:26+00:00): I edited it to remove the "\" and added new objects, but when I try to upload the changes, I get error code 429 and the message "Rate limit exceeded"... I saved the osm file in JOSM, tried sending it later - it still gives an error... I tried sending it in fragments, and even one at a time - it still gives the same error... and specifically in "Sheki"... I corrected it in other regions, everything is fine there, there are no errors... what should I do?..
CRCulver (2026-06-05 12:12:39+00:00): MenKauRa, this changeset was made from JOSM. That application normally warns, before you upload the changeset, about empty nodes in the Validation pane on the right side of the screen. Do you have that turned on?
MenKauRa (2026-06-06 10:27:28+00:00): I tried it today - it seems to have worked... the packages are loading... I didn't touch the old package I saved that wouldn't load anymore... I'll be editing everything again... I noticed a lot of empty points, these are points from field roads and objects that I tried to load... I'm gradually deleting them or creating them again...