piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NorthCrab_upload (2025-07-13 21:50:51+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1414511374

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2025-07-13 22:01:00+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1038702627

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
mstrbrid (2025-10-05 10:26:02+00:00): Hi, 
What exactly are you trying to map here? The land ownership, or everything that is publicly accessible? If it's the former, I don't know that it has a place on the OSM database, unless you wanted to highlight natural areas managed by 'operator=Natural Resources Wales': https://datamap.gov.wales/layers/inspire-nrw:NRW_FOREST_LEGAL_BOUND.

 If it's the latter then an mp-relation with suitable access tags might be more appropriate.
Either way, I can't see any evidence that it's a nature reserve:
https://datamap.gov.wales/layers/inspire-nrw:NRW_LNR or
https://datamap.gov.wales/layers/geonode:nrw_nnr_declarations
and it'd be worth following the local language, i.e: 'name=Parc Coedwig Afan' , 'name:en=Afan Forest Park'
ceirios (2025-10-05 18:37:24+00:00): Hi there,

Yes I'm trying to map the latter here - the reason why I haven't made it a MP yet is that the boundaries are not completely clear from that first link. I agree that the boundaries need looking at. Thanks for the other two links.

As for the name, Port Talbot is a very English-speaking area and the current consensus is that the dominant language is in the name field. (I disagree with this personally but that is what it is).
mstrbrid (2025-10-07 11:26:34+00:00): OK, it's the first time I've looked at names, and I felt, similarly to you, that it was backwards. 

As for the boundaries themselves, the first link shows land ownership, so it would only be appropriate to import that data into OSM if you've got evidence that access is directly linked to ownership. Is that the case?
What seems to be clear though, is that it's not a `leisure=nature_reserve`, and would likely be best represented by updating the existing `natural=forest` polygons into an MP with the appropriate access and operator tags added. Much as:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3155570 or https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1849496
NorthCrab_upload (2025-07-13 22:31:45+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/776253399

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NieWnen (2025-07-13 23:32:18+00:00): Mam wątpliwości do operatora ZTM Warszawa na peronach WKD.

Raczej nimi bezpośrednio nie zarządzają, a wspólny bilet to trochę coś innego (pomijając w ogóle kwestie jak to jest ograniczone)?
Anas masuris (2025-07-13 23:36:48+00:00): ZTM Warszawa jest dołączone do network=*, nie do operator=*
Anas masuris (2025-07-13 23:37:00+00:00): ZTM Warszawa jest dołączone do network=*, nie do operator=*
NieWnen (2025-07-14 00:11:14+00:00): Mój błąd, źle spojrzałem :)
NieWnen (2025-08-03 12:34:19+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/42562064

A ten peron to nie będzie "peron 1"? Bo w sumie teraz jest duplikat "peron 2".
NieWnen (2025-08-03 12:35:36+00:00): Taka sama sytuacja też z przystankiem Kazimierówka.
Anas masuris (2025-08-03 12:39:57+00:00): Faktycznie, nie dopilnowałem - peron 1 jest przy torze 2, a peron 2 przy torze 1, zaraz poprawię
NieWnen (2025-07-13 23:22:54+00:00): Pomijam przenoszenie tagów z linii na węzeł, bo to sztuka dla sztuki i jak widać kwestia dyskusyjna, ale dlaczego zostało usunięte lit z przejść tam gdzie lampy są w pobliżu?

Np. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1375971838
KhalidKashmiri (2025-07-14 00:47:10+00:00): Generalnie to chciałem już w osobnej edycji dodać lit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168894781
KhalidKashmiri (2025-07-14 00:54:48+00:00): A co do przenoszenia tagów to w 99% było to po prostu powtórzenie info z węzła. Wszystkie tagi "typowo liniowe" typu smoothness czy surface zostawiłem
NieWnen (2025-07-14 01:06:47+00:00): No z tym się nie zgadzam i te w swojej okolicy na pewno wycofam. Usuwanie tego z chodników, czy liniowych przejść (które nadal są chodnikami) uważam za niepoprawną zmianę.
Lit na węźle dla mnie jest totalnie bezwartościowy tym bardziej, że nie jest to punkt świetlny, które już oznaczamy jako lampy, więc nie rozumiem skąd ten pomysł.
NieWnen (2025-07-14 01:28:55+00:00): *W kontekście `highway=crossing` oczywiście.

Ogólnie to przed takimi masowymi zmianami zachęcam do patrzenia choćby w użycie na taginfo.

Dla przykładu:

https://taginfo.geofabrik.de/europe:poland/tags/footway=crossing#combinations

https://taginfo.geofabrik.de/europe:poland/tags/highway=crossing#combinations

Tag `lit` na przejściach w Polsce:
– liniowych ponad 17%  (27.9k)
– punktowych 0.14% (502 – nie licząc Twoich +178)

Więc raczej nie jest to ogólnie zbyt popularne. Wyłączając dość nowego użytkownika w okolicach Poznania (gdzie akurat bywa mix tagowania dziwnych schematów), to jeszcze mniej :)

--

Rozumiem chęć usuwania duplikatów, choć jak dla mnie to trochę walka z wiatrakami w kwestii przejść jeśli edytory pozwalają na takie duplikowanie, a nawet zachęcają + globalnie nie jest to zabronione, a wręcz niektórzy zachęcają do tego, ale po sprawdzeniu użycia na taginfo proponuję ten `lit` całkowicie cofnąć.
KhalidKashmiri (2025-07-14 10:49:02+00:00): Racja, powinienem był zweryfikować na taginfo. Tym samym pod wieczór przeniosę na linie.
felipeeugenio (2025-07-14 12:36:22+00:00): Hola. highway=busway es para vías segregadas. Por favor consultar a la comunidad o a la wiki para estos cambios.
Asímismo, sidewalk son veredas. Cmabié esos caminos a corridor, que es lo que hay en el terminal Alameda.
Por favor ingresar al chat de la comunidad en Telegram (https://t.me/OSMcl). Ahí podemos compartir todas las dudas con cientos de otros maperos.

Saludos
Rodrigo Rega (2025-07-16 19:53:23+00:00): Boas. Vexo que hai pouco que empezache a editar en OSM, así que antes de nada, gustaríame darche a benvida. Escríboche porque en esta edición engadiuse un "name=Escaleira". Ten en conta que a etiqueta "name" debe ser usada solo para nomes propios, non para describir os elementos. En este caso, as escaleiras non soen ter nome, así que non habería que poñer nada como nome. En casos nos que sexa necesario engadir información extra, pódese usar a etiqueta "description". Pero en este caso concreto non parece que sexa necesario, xa que un "Escaleira" non aporta información extra que non aporte xa o "highway=steps". Podes votar un ollo a esta páxina si queres mais detalles sobre isto: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres#Nombre_es_solo_el_nombre Benvido de novo, e gracias polos teus aportes ó mapa. Unha aperta.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168893393
Filip009 (2025-07-14 07:31:01+00:00): Hello, please correct opening_hours https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12998194241
snoozingnewt (2025-07-14 03:22:34+00:00): Checking in - are you planning on finishing later or should I take it over the next few days

Best,
snoozingnewt
maxwellward (2025-07-14 03:25:57+00:00): Hey, thanks for checking! I've got another project to work on so feel free to take over.

Have fun!
Max
MassCartog (2025-07-14 13:26:05+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM! Wanted to let you know removing building outlines and and just marking the area complex is incorrect. The the map should match the reality on the ground, so if there are individual buildings, then that's how it should be mapped.
cgracia88 (2025-07-14 17:52:10+00:00): Sorry, I was getting the hang of it yesterday.  With buildings like these, should I map individual buildings, and then do the apartment complex, but layer it. Thanks for the help?! I can improve my skills with your notes.  They assigned me to do this work for 12 hours a day!
MassCartog (2025-07-14 19:21:03+00:00): Hey, yah check out the wiki, if you are wondering how to map something you can always find it there! https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/

I'm curious, who assigned you this? Are you mapping for a job?
cgracia88 (2025-07-14 20:27:23+00:00): I work for an Amazon DSP, I’m a delivery driver. I got injured on the job where I tore three ligaments in my foot out here in Kalihi Valley. So they wanted me to work on volunteer work for “Task Manager” and then I learned that I needed 250. It’s just while I get back on my feet but this work is actually kinda cool. I’m honestly learning by doing and feedback, I  think this work is important. We had a natural disaster hit a neighboring island so I think this work would benefit future instances.
gdt (2025-10-05 23:55:51+00:00): According to the MassDOT data set as shown in MassMapper, Meadow Pond is a public road, with a 35' right of way.   It may be that the marking is improper, which would not change access.    I'll see about contacting Concord, after finishing up with Acton :-)
leocassarani (2025-09-09 12:02:45+00:00): Hi, where did you get "Onslow Court" (should be "Winslow Court") and "Olivers Mansions" (doesn't exit) from? I've fixed the former, and will fix the latter today.
philipcullen (2025-09-09 12:34:39+00:00): Hi, the names were added in a much earlier changes by someone else about 15 years ago, so I'm not sure how they were arrived at, but thanks for fixing them.
leocassarani (2025-09-09 15:42:38+00:00): Sorry Phil, I'd misread the changeset! Apologies for the confusion.
felipeeugenio (2025-07-14 12:15:06+00:00): Hola. Dejé los edificios por separado. Aun cuando estén juntos, se dibujan por separados.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168895247
aharvey (2025-07-14 02:20:23+00:00): the waterway needed to be split here so that the section could be removed, I checked over this in JOSM and repaired the boundary relation
SomeoneElse (2025-12-07 14:15:08+00:00): Is there a crossing island at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12980053851 ?
MacLondon (2025-12-08 20:08:33+00:00): No island. I've corrected the error now (and have also remove tactile_paving from the middle of the road.)
SomeoneElse (2025-12-08 20:57:11+00:00): Thanks!
user_5359 (2025-07-14 16:53:17+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1414545147. What is the mean of the tag
建築物編碼 = A11?
AndreaDp271 (2025-07-27 16:08:25+00:00): Ciao, cos'hai modificato?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168895771
gigi2037 (2025-07-27 19:42:16+00:00): ciao ho eliminato una delle due platform dalla relazione
tastrax (2025-07-24 00:28:08+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, +61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features#Phone_Numbers .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
TheSwavu (2025-07-28 04:21:19+00:00): I'm not sure that this belongs in OSM. I have never heard anyone refer to this area as "Brickfield Hill" and everything I can find online says "was known as" (except for Brickfield Hospitality, who would like you to call it that for obvious reasons).

Maybe something for OpenHistoryMap?
jakecopp (2025-07-28 05:02:00+00:00): Yes, perhaps doesn't belong in OSM. Considering it has a full Wikipedia page (and is present tense) I thought perhaps it's been overlooked. If nobody else has heard of it happy to remove - will delete the node.
TheSwavu (2025-07-28 08:41:43+00:00): I added a citation needed. Let's see how long till they delete that ;-)
TheSwavu (2025-07-14 04:57:36+00:00): Hi,

Two questions:

1. What is "IRC" and do we have permission to use whatever that is in OSM?

2. Is the name of these roads really "Needs A Name Road"?

Thanks.
TereseWilcock_GISOfficer_IRC (2025-07-14 05:16:04+00:00): 1. Isaac Regional Council
2. actually it's just called "Needs A Name" (Page 24 https://www.isaac.qld.gov.au/files/assets/public/v/7/residents/roads-and-infrastructure/isaac-regional-council-road-register.pdf)
aharvey (2025-07-14 12:32:53+00:00): Hi are you making these edits on behalf of Isaac Regional Council? We need to be careful when incorporating copyrighted materials into OSM to ensure it can be licensed under OSM's license.

Generally we need a waiver letter to incorporate existing CC BY licensed open data. In this case the council doesn't utilise an open license per https://www.isaac.qld.gov.au/Site-Footer/Copyright so the only way we can use this material from council is if you're acting the the authority of the council and agreeing to release this data per the OSM contributor terms and license (which is less restrictive than the councils standard copyright terms).
TereseWilcock_GISOfficer_IRC (2025-07-16 02:30:36+00:00): I am acting with the authority of the council and agreeing to release this data per the OSM contributor terms and license.
aharvey (2025-07-17 01:34:47+00:00): Thanks!
seattlefyi (2025-08-03 02:13:07+00:00): Hi, coincidentally confirmed today a Taco Bell does exist here. Have replaced it.
julcnx (2025-11-11 05:29:58+00:00): i GrabTH_Thamolvan, thanks for your contributions. Could you please share what source or wiki definition you used to justify these classification changes? These roads belong to an Agriculture and Development Center. Best, Julien
julcnx (2025-11-18 03:07:02+00:00): reverted for conflicting classification changes and lack of response from original mapper

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174799745
PierZen (2025-08-21 15:47:32+00:00): Thank you for your contribution but try to make smaller changeset areas to help local contributors to review.
IamJesse (2025-07-14 20:41:16+00:00): What is up with these massive changesets
GA_Kevin (2025-07-14 21:55:38+00:00): Hi! This was because i was touching all the Tesla Destination chargers with incorrect frequency tags in the US so it was a bit spread out
TrickyFoxy (2025-07-19 09:21:21+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169142760
aharvey (2025-07-14 05:15:37+00:00): the change looks okay, just https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1414558740 should be highway=service + service=driveway rather than unclassified which is generally for a public road rather than a driveway leading to a house.

Not sure what you mean by "256^2 block of terrain data" though....
fortera_au (2025-07-14 23:07:59+00:00): Maps4FS sounds like Farming Simulator, please ensure what you map is real, we often have mappers coming in here making fictional edits for games. For example, for Farming Simulator, we've had mappers draw several smaller lots of farmland where only one exists. What's been done here does look alright though, some of the tagging could be improved (the building=garage and water=pond probably have more accurate options), but other than that, I agree with aharvey.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168897332
MobiusModding (2025-07-15 03:17:19+00:00): Indeed it is! sorry about the service road, ill keep that in mind for the future! 

to allow me to go into more detail. Farming simulator maps sizes are mesured in two ways, in terms of X scale or KM scale, a 1x (or 1 tile/scale) map is 2km by 2km or 4km squared total. the typical map sizes are 1x, or 4km^2, 4x or 16km^2 (4x meaning the map size has been increased to fit 4 1x maps within) and 16x, or 64km^. 

in recent testing i discovered a theoretical 64x or 16 x 16km/256km^ map was possible, and thus wanting to base said map off a location irl, I picked here.

in theory this is the first real 64x map with IRL terrain data, the largest in the series history.

im sorry about your recent experiences with people misusing the maps4fs system, i wish to keep all the fields as accurate to irl as possible, most modders split the fields as you mentioned before due to the fact the standard map sizes are so small, a single field would be boring... Because im useing a 64x the standard map size, this isnt an issue.

id like to close off for now that the area east of merredin I edited is the top left most corner, in the coming days ill outline every field around the total map edge so you can see just how much/ how large it will be, then start working on the center. 
Sorry for the roads agian! have a nice day!
MobiusModding (2025-07-15 03:23:32+00:00): also i just realized what i said was kinda confusing... sorry if you wish for me to explain more, i can.
fortera_au (2025-07-15 12:23:39+00:00): That makes sense to me, and I'm glad to hear that you're wanting to map it accurately to bring into the game! Not only does that give you a real world map to use, but it also means more is mapped in OSM, which is a win for all!

If you do have any questions, feel free to check out the Oceania section of the forums at https://c.osm.org, or the #oceania channel in the OSM World Discord.
MobiusModding (2025-07-16 01:05:02+00:00): Thank you! i was wondering if there were any forums or places to ask for help? I don't want to ask for help here if its not allowed, I understand that most likely nobody would be willing, but its worth a shot, until then ill continue working solo, anything would help really.
this will definitely take a long time but im willing to make it work.
wa_wheatbelt (2026-04-20 18:18:07+00:00): Hi there. Thank you for editing the map. I agree with aharvey and fortera_au, especially if you were editing a region that was previously untouched on OpenStreetMap. But it’s important to always look at how things are mapped nearby and try to edit in harmony with that, both for consistency and to respect your fellow mappers.

Around Merredin, farmland bounded by public roads is usually a single property. From year to year, crop fields might be divided or merged, and sheep can get moved around too. So trying to map each individual field isn’t really helpful here for any real world applications, and I would argue that it’s creating a map that is going to need regular maintenance to keep it accurate. Better to just outline entire areas of farmland, up to their outer fence lines, until they’re interrupted by public roads or a rail corridor.

Also, think about the gaps created in between the fields you’re drawing with landuse=farmland. The tracks between fields, the creeks, and other features are still part of the farmland. So in my opinion it doesn’t make a whole lot of sense to leave those gaps.

Please understand that I don’t intend to be critical. I’m the only resident mapper in this area, so I’ve made it my mission to make the best map of Merredin I can. It’s great to have some help on that. But when I came across your work today (I’ve been focusing on north of Great Eastern Highway for quite a while) and noticed the separately drawn fields, hopefully you can understand that I was mildly alarmed to find it done in this manner for no reason except for the aesthetics of a video game. 😅 So I just wanted to add my two cents.

Moving on, I have some tips to help you with your mapping.

1. When you draw buildings in iD, press the “Q” key after you drawn it and tagged it as a building. That will perfectly square the corners so it doesn’t look wonky.

2. According to my research, the correct way to tag small bodies of water on Australian farms is as a pond.

3. Please refer frequently to the OSM Wiki. There’s so much to learn, and plenty of nuance in tagging norms from country to country.
b-jazz (2025-07-15 03:32:14+00:00): RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/593951832

When drawing golf course areas (such as greens, fairways, bunkers, tees, etc.), please be aware that the lines used to outline those areas can't cross over each other. Fairways outlines shouldn't cross over greens or fairways for example. Take a look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Golf.png for an example of the "Wrong" way to map a fairway and a green. (The same can be said about fairways and bunkers, tees, roughs, etc.) There are some cases where a fringe exists around a green and you should draw the fairway outline completely around a green. Other times, the fairway and green butt up against each other. In that case the fairway and green should share the same nodes at the boundary between the two. If you could go back and clean up where you've made this mistake, that would be great. But more importantly, if you could stop from doing this in the future, it would be greatly appreciated. If you have any questions about golf course mapping, feel free to reach out. Thanks.
NeisBot (2025-07-14 04:30:46+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description
NeisReview (2025-07-18 05:29:40+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/169089684
Hufkratzer (2025-07-14 19:41:32+00:00): Hi,
I think that a trailhead is not a trail riding station and especially not an equestrian center (leisure=horse_riding) as it is described in the wiki. Here is an example of an equestrian centre:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1228517621#map=17/47.747602/-122.142085&layers=P

There is a tag for trailheads (highway=trailhead, used ~15k x), Wouldn't that be more appropriate for a trailhead?
Mashin (2025-07-14 09:18:49+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM!

Thanks for your edits, here I just noticed two small things.

* for simple stairs we typically don't create building:part area, but rather draw a simple line tagged as highway=steps.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dsteps

* Driveways are more suited for reads leading to a house/garage. For parking lots, we use service=parking_aisle

Cheers
user_8655426 (2025-07-14 10:48:33+00:00): こんにちは。OpenStreetMap へようこそ。
OpenStreetMap は現在、実際に存在する地物をマッピングするプロジェクトです。(real and current) 架空の地物を追加したり、既存のデータを実際とは異なるものに変更したりしないでください。よろしくお願いします。(事実と異なる不正な編集を行ったユーザーは、ブロックされる可能性があります。)

・「ようこそ！」
https://www.openstreetmap.org/welcome
・JA:破壊行為
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:破壊行為

---

・JA:初心者ガイド
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:初心者ガイド
・learnOSM (ビギナーズガイド)
https://learnosm.org/ja/beginner/
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168898318
user_8655426 (2025-07-14 11:31:41+00:00): Reverted. (vandalism)
#168898318, #168898313, #168898310, #168898302
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168912335
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168898318