piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
grzegorz75jan (2024-08-10 19:02:47+00:00): Dzięki za ruszenie tego. Nie wiem czy robiłeś to pod wpływem mojego wpisu na Discordzie. Jeżeli nie to w terenie jest rozbicie numerów domów na wejścia https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/810944590348550215/1267544615276515368/IMG20240729_181921.jpg?ex=66b8fe6a&is=66b7acea&hm=bfad0c8866ad1c2f6a47cd64154216cf9d9add7c3c8b0d92a223b70f021ae598& Ten poziomy fragment Pańskiej od północy nie udało mi się zweryfikować w terenie czy ten fragment to Pańska czy jednak Ekumeniczna. Pamiętam tylko, że dawniej Był kawałek prostej Ekumenicznej od ul. Spacerowej i tam się zawijała ta ulica i dalej były pola. Jeżeli dobrze pójdzie to dołożę nawierzchnię bo tam jest asfalt, beton, kostka i grunt.
grzegorz75jan (2024-08-10 20:18:22+00:00): Witam. Dzięki za dłubnięcie tego. Być może widziałeś wzmiankę o tym na Discordzie

Tego odcinka ulicy https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1305846498 oraz nie udało mi się ustalić czy realnie to Ekumeniczna czy Pańska.
The Polish (2024-08-11 07:34:06+00:00): Przez przypadek trafiłem, nie czytałem na Discordzie.

Ten mały fragment należy do ul. Pańskiej.
grzegorz75jan (2025-07-25 09:18:17+00:00): Są już tabliczki na budynkach. Nazwy ulic się zgadzają.
The Polish (2025-07-25 09:30:25+00:00): Czyli jest dobrze.
StreetSurveyor (2024-08-19 21:27:50+00:00): Yes, they should. Just because it has limited hours doesn't mean it's private. I personally conducted a survey during one of their time windows and it was fine to walk around.
Lumikeiju (2024-08-06 01:59:20+00:00): This changeset edited no geometry and made the following tag-only modifications:

Filter: way[building=church]["addr:housenumber"][!"addr:city"|"addr:state"|"addr:country"];

Added:
"addr:state=WA" | 16 objects
"addr:country=US" | 52 objects

Removed:
"gnis:county_id" | 17 objects
"gnis:created" | 17 objects
"gnis:state_id" | 17 objects
"source=*" | 49 objects
"source:name=*" | 1 object
Lordmcfuzz (2025-05-09 00:40:22+00:00): confirmed
https://www.belmont-ma.gov/390/Rules-Regulations
Lumikeiju (2024-08-06 02:18:21+00:00): This changeset edited no geometry and made the following tag-only modifications:

Filter: way["building"="house"]["addr:housenumber"][!"name"][!"addr:city"|"addr:state"|"addr:country"];

Added:
"addr:city=Seattle" | 6 objects
"addr:state=WA" | 12 objects
"addr:country=US" | 38 objects

Removed:
"source=*" | 13 objects
"source:addr:id=*" | 1 object
dillard243 (2024-08-06 02:52:11+00:00): Oops, I forgot to add sources... Used my gps data and official trail map found here: https://www.randolphnj.org/DocumentCenter/View/482/Randolph-trail-system-PDF?bidId=
jhaluska80 (2024-08-06 17:38:35+00:00): Nice source.  You'll notice that in the PDF under "Rules of the Trails" that Motor Vehicle/ Dirt Bikes/ATVs / Horses are prohibited.  There are access tags that you can add to trails to indicate they are prohibited and dogs are leashes are allowed.  A lot of the features have assumed defaults, but it doesn't hurt to tag they're not allowed as it indicates something explicitly stated they're not allowed.  (You only need to tag the ones that it mentions).

There's also an opening_hours that can be set to "sunrise-sunset".

There's an "alcohol = no" tag

There's also operator tag to indicator who maintains them, there's even operator:phone number so you can put in who to contact about the trail!

None of these are absolutely required to do, but the more information you can transfer from the PDF the more useful OSM becomes as people can easily search for trails that meet their requirements.
sen_takeya (2024-09-10 08:48:29+00:00): Hello,Engineer0088397
Is the Emigrants Cemetery Visit Hotel that you added actually located there?
sen_takeya (2025-01-02 15:12:14+00:00): Removed
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160911779
felipeeugenio (2024-08-06 13:23:32+00:00): María.
Por favor observar cómo está mapeado el resto de las cosas. En todas las ediciones que hiciste ayer hay errores, lo que es normal en quienes empiezas, pero estos son errores de precisión, no de conocimientos. No hacemos dibujos esquemáticos de las cosas en OSM.
Los estacionamientos están todos dibujados encima de edificios, calles, etc...
Además usando nombres descriptivos y con contracciones.

Estoy corrigiendo todo ahora.
Muchas gracias por las ediciones y por favor no dudes en escribirme si tienes dudas, pero por favor tomarse un poco mas de tiempo para darle precisión a los dibujos.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154874216
CAM-Gerlach (2024-08-10 02:44:21+00:00): Hey, thanks—its not entirely clear from the OSMCha UI, but I'm guessing I accidently broke the Huckleberry Trail route relation here in my previous Southgate changeset? I usually try to be careful to not do so and ensure any split/combining of way segments preserve relations, but I guess I must have gotten a bit too complacent here trusting in JOSM to either do the right thing automatically or warn me if the situation was ambiguous, as it usually does.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154874348
mvolkhart (2024-08-10 13:40:07+00:00): I think what happened was you split a path by inserting a crossing (totally normal, nothing bad here), and when I resolved the conflicts I deleted the "new" path segment you added, as my changes were still based on the older, longer path.
CAM-Gerlach (2024-08-10 21:56:38+00:00): Ah gotcha—that makes more sense; I thought I might be missing some context. I couldn't see just from comparing those two changesets what was being restored relative to mine, except for possibly the relation, so I just assumed it must have been that. Thanks for the explanation and taking care of the fix!
CAM-Gerlach (2024-08-10 22:00:38+00:00): Speaking of which, on a related (heh) note—I see the cycleway along Beamer Way connecting the Huckleberry trail along Southgate with that just north of the airport is part of the Huckleberry Trail route relation, but doesn't have `name=Huckleberry Trail` like the others.

Is that an oversight that should be fixed, or is there a reason for that, do you know? Thanks!
CAM-Gerlach (2024-08-10 03:20:25+00:00): Hey, so since it looks like you have quite a bit of experience mapping cycleways in OSM, I'd really appreciate your insight on the appropriate method of mapping cycleway or dual-use foot/cycleway crossings. Intuitively, tagging as `cycleway=crossing` seemed to make the most sense, as you've reverted to here. However, when I checked the wiki page for this tag, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cycleway%3Dcrossing , it said:

> This tag is only to be used in countries where cycle crossings have a legal status (for instance having right of way when an ordinary cycleway wouldn’t).

My assumption from the examples presented and my understanding of cycling law in the US (versus Europe) was that this was not the case here, but upon further thought it seems I might have misunderstood and in fact this is appropriate after all, with cyclelists having right of way over cars at this junction without dismounting?

Thanks!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154874371
mvolkhart (2024-08-10 14:07:32+00:00): > in fact this is appropriate after all, with cyclelists having right of way over cars at this junction without dismounting?

Yeah that's my interpretation based on https://www.vdot.virginia.gov/travel-traffic/bike-ped/bike-safety/ and the related legislation, as the trail here doesn't have signage but the crossing is clearly marked. Not only do cyclists not have to dismount, they don't have to stop or yield (unless the car is already "in the intersection", so to speak).

I think the explicit crossing is helpful from several perspectives. It expresses the legislative intent of the segment, as well as the details of path use (surface, markings, etc). Routing apps might use that information to provide a faster route, or to caution of an upcoming yield-crossing.
CAM-Gerlach (2024-08-10 21:57:14+00:00): Gotcha, thanks! It seems my initial confusion stemmed from misreading the wiki guidance to say that cycleway crossings should only be used when cycleway crossings have a legal status distinct from _footway crossings_ as opposed to a distinct status from _plain cycleways_, which is why I initially tagged this (and others) as a footway crossing instead of a cycleway crossing (despite the latter seeming more intuitive).

Given both the legal status and also my misread, its clear tagging this as the latter indeed makes more sense, thanks, and I'll keep that in mind for other crossings.
CAM-Gerlach (2024-08-10 21:59:04+00:00): And on that note, I fixed the crossing ways for the cycleway connecting the segment of Huckleberry Trail along Southgate with that just north of the airport to be cycleway rather than footway crossings.
Joseph R P (2024-08-06 06:15:36+00:00): Can you clarify why my edit is "wrong"? This is by OSM definition a trunk stub.
kartler175 (2024-08-06 12:59:20+00:00): please fix:
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-81.10315&lat=44.90314&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.95&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways
woodpeck_repair (2024-08-08 15:06:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 154984107 where the changeset comment is: revert test edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16548
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-08-06 23:19:21+00:00): Please don't delete and add roads back later
watmildon (2024-09-21 23:30:09+00:00): Lovely work! I have been trying to add ballot drop boxes across Colorado and was wondering if you knew where the drop box in the Clifton Community Campus was located. Even the MESA 2024 imagery leaves me stumped.

Either way, great work and happy mapping!
acarasimon96 (2024-09-22 00:04:39+00:00): Thank you for the kind words. I am very proud of the work I did here, and your appreciation really means a lot.

Yes, the Mesa County GIS imagery isn't recent enough for that area because it looks like it was taken sometime in March 2024, when the community center was on its final stages of construction. (You can tell in the imagery that the most of the trees were growing leaves.) It was, however, sufficient enough for me to be able to map out many of the features on campus.

I visited the place myself the day before I uploaded this changeset to see what the campus looked like on the ground and find more features that were not present in the imagery such as fences and playground areas. At that time, I found the ballot dropbox beside a bench by its south side on the sidewalk parallel to the west parking lot. The benches and the dropbox were directly west of the bike parking area closest to the west entrance. I haven't had the time to add those features because I was busy with other mapping projects in other parts of the valley.

I have not visited the campus since that day, so the ballot dropbox is either still on the exact spot where last I saw it or moved somewhere else in that area.
watmildon (2024-09-22 03:13:17+00:00): Excellent. I believe that this is roughly correct, feel free to move it if you discover I have err'd. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12191952580/history#map=19/39.071485/-108.447215 

Fun to see OSM on the community center page! https://www.mesacounty.us/resident-resources/clifton-community-center

The last drop box in Mesa that remains out of my grasp is listed at the Mesa Fairgrounds. I'll keep sleuthing.
acarasimon96 (2024-09-22 03:34:07+00:00): Looks good to me. The position of the nodes appear to be accurate compared to what I saw.

I was surprised to see the Mesa County website use Leaflet and OSM when I first visited the page for the community center. At least the campus no longer looks empty on the map.
Lumikeiju (2024-08-06 04:40:03+00:00): This changeset edited no geometry and made the following tag-only modifications:

Filter: way["building"="apartments"]["addr:housenumber"][!("addr:city"|"addr:state"|"addr:country")];

Added:
"addr:city=Seattle" | 50 objects
"addr:state=WA" | 14 objects
"addr:country=US" | 1188 objects

Removed:
"addr:housenumber:source=*" | 1 object
"tiger:county=*" | 1 object
"source:path=*" | 1 object
"source:addr=*" | 1 object
"source:addr:id=*" | 22 objects
"source=*" except where "source~.*http.*" | 680
aharvey (2024-08-07 06:47:38+00:00): I've restored https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2921282680/history which was deleted here, and merged in your changes, it's important to try and retain the history of existing objects when you are making improvements to the data.
Lumikeiju (2024-08-06 04:53:14+00:00): This changeset edited no geometry and made the following tag-only modifications:

Filter: way["building"="industrial"]["addr:housenumber"][!"addr:city"|"addr:state"|"addr:country"];

Added:
"addr:city=Seattle" | 3 objects
"addr:state=WA" | 32 objects
"addr:country=US" | 80 objects

Removed:
"source:path=*" | 1 object
"source:addr=*" | 1 object
"source:addr:id=*" | 1 objects
"source=*" except where "source~.*http.*" | 70
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-08-08 23:32:22+00:00): why are all the trails disconnected?
SSE2020 (2024-08-09 02:34:02+00:00): in that area are some dead end trails. Also, I am new to this and had to start over multiple times
KhoraKavat (2024-08-06 04:54:59+00:00): Добавление адресов, город Ужур
NorthCrab_upload (2024-08-06 05:30:26+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11382025504
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1305871925

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
FUZZY_42 (2024-08-11 15:32:09+00:00): It was not vandalism or a mistake.
FUZZY_42 (2024-08-11 15:30:57+00:00): It was not vandalism or a mistake.
CRCulver (2024-08-12 05:48:01+00:00): If you do not explain your edits and match the facts on the ground, I will continue to revert your Samarkand changesets and escalate this matter to the Data Working Group. I see that you were already blocked in the past for writing only “исправление ошибок” as your changeset comment.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-08-06 10:06:55+00:00): reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154885660
jeslop (2024-08-06 17:39:06+00:00): Mariba, el vandalismo no está permitido en OSM.
Karzanom (2024-08-06 21:56:28+00:00): what did you change #digitalegypt
little_maper (2024-08-07 07:28:39+00:00): Hello Karzanom;
I have connected the footway with the highway and you can see my changes In changeset :
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=154877575
Regards
little_maper
❤️‍🔥 (2024-08-06 09:12:09+00:00): hey, I see that you've been mapping each road lane as a separate line. This should only be done when there is a physical barrier between the lanes. There's some more info here: https://osm.wiki/Dual_carriageway You can usually access this documentation from the warnings that you saw in the editor

Other than that, your recent edits all look good :)
TrickyFoxy (2024-08-07 20:24:34+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154952715
habi (2024-08-12 13:37:45+00:00): Ciao Méndez de Muela

Welcome to OpenStreetMap!
We're happy to have you, it's great that you're helping to update the map data and help to keep it correct.

- https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12094726533 is a family *doctor*, not a hospital, I've changed this.
- You moved https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/282774221 out of the building, which is wrong. I've moved it back to the correct position.

Happy mapping,
habi
habi (2024-08-12 13:42:19+00:00): PS: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155149955
Méndez de Muela (2024-08-12 14:14:45+00:00): Hello Habi, that's right.
Thanks!
NorthCrab_upload (2024-08-06 07:10:14+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/349829392

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
mavl (2024-08-06 13:00:08+00:00): Здравствуйте. Это пакет правок добавляет велодорожки прямо на здания и дороги.
flohoff (2024-08-06 21:34:30+00:00): Moin,
aber der ist doch nicht dauerhaft eingestellt sondern nur Witterungsbedingt oder?

Flo
Mathias_ADAV (2024-10-11 07:40:14+00:00): https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=784050257263524&set=a.480786820923204
eggie (2024-08-06 08:38:48+00:00): Dag Erwin,

Die dubbele nummers werken niet goed bij een zoekslag. Nr 107 staat al op het pand ernaast.

MVG
eggie
HirschKauz (2024-08-06 10:29:09+00:00): Hi, and welcome to Openstreetmap :-)

Please consider keeping your Changesets "local"  
That means: save your changes before moving to another location.
Please read: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Regards, and happy mapping :-)
HirschKauz (2024-08-06 10:29:57+00:00): oh I see.... welcome "back" :-)
silversurfer83 (2024-08-06 14:57:31+00:00): Helle there :)

just a little heads up: There already was a Bistro Bosman at that location. I went ahead and merged your double entry with the existing one since you added the missing adress. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154896932

Please be aware that Organic Maps is a very good routing app but isn't well suited for editing. Maybe add an app like Every Door where you can see the current state of the database while editing.

cheers and safe travels
silversurfer83
didier2020 (2024-08-22 14:40:35+00:00): Bonjour,
vos données dupliquent des informations

https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/map/#source=411444&item=1230&class=4&zoom=17&lat=43.943883&lon=4.83803&level=2&issue_uuid=8f18bd23-4786-e477-2059-333af00dcdbe&loc=17/43.943883/4.83803
chrizy (2024-09-20 08:09:08+00:00): Bonjour,
Merci pour votre signalement. Je viens de corriger ceux de la rue Henry Le Chatelier et vais m'occuper de tous les autres sur Avignon dans les jours à venir. Cdlt
didier2020 (2024-09-20 12:17:43+00:00): Merci !
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-09-09 12:14:49+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12094809559/history has maxspeed = 0 that was added in this edit
what maxspeed=0 is supposed to mean? If moving for vehicles (or some of them) is not allowed, then maybe one of access tags should be used and maxspeed=0 is not needed?
AndersAndersson (2024-08-06 21:58:59+00:00): Hello
There is no need to name a bench "bench". The tags describing the feature is enough. only named features shall have names.
Tobi A (2024-08-07 12:06:35+00:00): Hello

All the campsites I have registered are simple pitches where you can only stay with a camper, van, car or tent.
Tobi A (2024-08-07 12:08:18+00:00): Okay, sorry, I've done it for the first time.
Protoxenus (2024-09-18 12:20:53+00:00): Please check your edits! 
Read the wiki, before you map something again. Have you never seen a map in your life? Things are represented there by symbols, not by names. Do not use German names in a foreign country, except in a context "...=de:".
It's also bad for clarity when things are edited in a change record that stretches over more than 1000km. 
Regards Protoxenus
AndersAndersson (2024-08-06 21:55:42+00:00): Hello
Are all those camping places real camping places or is it just possible to camp there (like a very large amount of places in Sweden)?
Tobi A (2024-08-07 12:06:24+00:00): Hello

All the campsites I have registered are simple pitches where you can only stay with a camper, van, car or tent.
Tomas Straupis (2024-08-06 09:30:36+00:00): Laba diena. Čia gyva duomenų bazė, pakeitimai matomi visiems, tai žaisti čia nereikėtų :-) Atšaukiau.
GretaMN (2024-08-12 10:49:50+00:00): Liebe:r EilsaMK,
bitte teile die Hauptlinie an dem "Radweg Ende" Schild ergänze das Tagging für den vorhandenen Fuß- und Radweg hier bis er beendet wird.
Danke! :)
#lgmaps
Piskvor (2024-08-08 08:22:12+00:00): Dobrý den,

pokud ten vrchol má nějaký název (a zřejmě se používá, viz přilehlá NPP), je potřeba ho mazat, pokud ho neeviduje ČÚZK? Přinejhorším bych byl za přesun do loc_name - katastrální úřad stav světa taky popisuje, nepředepisuje "tohle neznáme, tak to neexistuje."
PatrioScraper (2024-08-20 08:24:29+00:00): Dobrý den,

Omlouvám se za pozdní odpověď. Je pravda, že ČÚZK rozhodně není všemocný, ale rozhodně bych ho bral jako tu největší "autoritu". Líbí se mi přesun do loc_name jako kompromis toho, že se místu takhle může říkat místními. Pak je jen otázka, jestli se místo má nazývat jen Hrabanov a nebo třeba Hrabanovský vrch apod.
Piskvor (2024-08-21 13:04:36+00:00): Dobrý den,

čas není zásadní, ten kopec už tam nějakou chvíli je, a pár dní ještě vydrží.

"Jak se to MÁ nazývat," to je vždy těžká otázka. Dosud jsem nenašel ani "...vrch," ani "...kopec"; jediný zmínky jsou "Hrabanov." Splývá to poněkud s ulicí téhož jména pod kopcem, ale to je, řekl bych, častý a normální stav.

https://cs.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soubor:Stara_Lysa_Pohled_o_Hra%C5%A1tice_k_Hrabanovu.JPG 

Přetagoval jsem to do loc_name=Hrabanov (mj. je to nejmenší změna oproti name=Hrabanov); je možné, že to někdo přetaguje na místně užívaný název, když bude znát lepší. I to je podle mě v pořádku.
eggie (2024-08-06 08:33:47+00:00): Dag FLupie,

Even gekeken.
Wanneer je aparte fietspaden intekent (Dus vrijlopende fietspaden.. klopt dat) dan kunnen de verwijzingen naar de fietsstroken uit de hoofdrijbaan verwijderd worden. 
cycleway=track  is een manier om een parallel fietspad op te nemen in de hoofdrijbaan.
cycleway=lane is de manier om een fietsstrook aan te gegeven.
Wanneer die er niet meer zijn kan die track en lane weg.
... plus de rijbaan kan op slot met bicycle=use_sidepad.
Er wordt nogal eens de vergissing gemaakt om parallelfietspaden op de kaart toe te voegen.. terwijl het in werkelijkheid fietsstroken zijn.
Jij weet het als lokale mapper. 




https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=154881132

Op het zuidelijke fietspad nog de juiste tagging behorende bij G11 toevoegen. 
sidewalk=yes zal denk ik sidewalk = right moeten zijn op het fietspad.

Kijk je weer even?
eggie (2024-08-06 08:35:46+00:00): Je kunt ook verwijzen naar een apart fietspad met cycleway:right=separate ipv track of lane.

Nog wel even bezig hier zo te zien.
FLupie (2024-08-06 13:23:04+00:00): Dank je eggie. Ik heb aanpassingen zojuist doorgevoerd.
lefuturiste (2024-08-07 08:46:54+00:00): Super, merci de votre contribution.
Quel est la source de l'information ? Un arpentage sur le terrain ?
AndroidRachel (2024-08-07 08:53:49+00:00): Bonjour, je suis passé à vélo. Les travaux venaient juste de se terminer, il y avait encore un engin de chantier garé sur le bord.
eggie (2024-08-06 10:58:53+00:00): Dag KP  Je vraagt feedback. Lijkt me oke zo.
MVG
eggie
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-17 04:45:17+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165053304
GretaMN (2024-08-12 10:53:10+00:00): Liebe:r ElisaMK,
bitte ergänze hier (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1305895013) die Breitenangabe des Weges für ein vollständiges Tagging.
Danke! :)
#lgmaps
GretaMN (2024-08-12 10:55:38+00:00): Liebe:r ElisaMK,
bitte ergänze auf diesem Weg den class:bicycle Wert und die Info, dass es auf beiden Seiten kein Radweg vorhanden ist.
Lieben Dank! :)
#lgmaps