piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
MassCartog (2026-02-10 14:36:34+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM. The feature you removed in this changeset is valid. Please don’t remove valid OSM data.

You have a new account and might not be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground. If it exists on the ground, it's valid data regardless of a feature being public or private, designated or informal/illegal/unauthorized. Removing features that exist is actually considered vandalism.

It's clear that these features still exist on the ground. Not being public access areas is an invalid reason to remove data from OSM. So this edit is incorrect and damaging to valid OSM data.

The correct way to handle this is to use OSM's tagging system. access=private, or access=no would be appropriate if they are closed to the public. Once this is done, services that do use OSM data will reflect that and specify their access.

Please read this for more info:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won't_delete_roads_on_private_property
AA-OSM (2026-02-10 15:01:30+00:00): How do I get it to not be connected then. There is a creek between the roads. I am tired of idiots using my private property as a shortcut and getting stuck in the creek.
MassCartog (2026-02-10 15:45:18+00:00): Thanks for the reply! Looks like you found a good way to tag it. It might take some time before other services that use OSM data update their maps, but now routing engines will now not send people down that way. Sorry to hear about the trespassing, In my personal experience physical barriers, gates, and clear signs are the best way to prevent people from using private roads, they can't get stuck if they are unable to get there.
Yog Sot (2026-02-11 14:05:01+00:00): ale czemu zmieniasz granice ewidencyjne?
berndw (2026-02-11 11:51:14+00:00): Hallo, willkommen bei OpenStreetMap

Sieht schon mal ziemlich gut aus für das erste Changeset.

Ich habe aber noch ein paar Fragen.

Hat es einen besonderen Grund, warum Du das Geschäft zu einer Wanderwegrelation hinzufügst, das ist zumindest ungewöhnlich.

Da ist doch bestimmt noch ein Gebäude drum herum, oder?

Ich hatte das Schild schon mal im Vorbeifahren gesehen, aber nicht weiter drauf geachtet, was für Gebäude da sind.

Möchtest Du das anpassen? 
Ich kann das aber auch machen.

Grüße aus Erpel
Goodthing (2026-02-11 12:21:48+00:00): Hallo,
danke für die Hinweise.
Das mit dem Wanderweg war spontan. Radweg gab es nicht.
Es gibt noch die Garage auf dem Grundstück in der das Geschäft ist.
Wenn Du Lust und Zeit hast kannst du das gerne anpassen. Du bist da bestimmt schneller als Profi.
Grüße aus Bruchhausen
Markus
berndw (2026-02-11 13:49:37+00:00): Vielen Dank für die schnelle Antwort

Ich werde die Garage als neutrales Gebäude mit building=yes erfassen und mit dem ALKIS-Hintergrund ausrichten.

Den Eintrag in der Wanderwegrelation nehme ich raus, macht keinen Sinn.
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-13 00:13:35+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13517220266
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13522877607
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13522877608

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Fraxi (2026-02-10 14:13:15+00:00): Има и един вход между Нани-МР и бившата Пощенска банка. Но не знам дали е staircase. Стъклената врата. Над нея имаше надписи за брокера, за професионалния домоуправител(но не знам на кой етаж са).
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1846997252116064&focus=photo&lat=42.672747765559&lng=23.284985377341&z=17
Dimitar155 (2026-02-10 20:12:55+00:00): Дългия блок няма вход от страната на Стефан Тошев, ако не ме лъже паметта. Може би имаш предвид входа до пицарията, който е към съседната сграда?
Fraxi (2026-02-10 20:24:53+00:00): Това е отделно. 
Стъклената врата, за която съм споменал. До "Нани-МР" отляво. Това не е към този магазин. https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=512297909960221&focus=photo&lat=42.672747765559&lng=23.284985377341&z=17&x=0.40780131438369527&y=0.5176281589408417&zoom=1.180327868852459
Fraxi (2026-02-10 20:26:43+00:00): За самия магазин си се влиза през вход отдясно. Под "чорапи" :)
Dimitar155 (2026-02-10 20:32:57+00:00): Колко пъти съм минавал оттам, досега не ми е направило впечатление :)
NeisBot (2026-02-10 13:39:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13540755739 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Dental office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-02-19 05:34:31+00:00): 🗑️ Element deleted by https://osm.org/changeset/178430008
regularcheese (2026-02-11 10:05:54+00:00): the path is not visible because of the trees. Lack of this information is making routing toward the building inefficient
bxl-forever (2026-02-11 22:07:12+00:00): I understand that.  The paths are still there, we simply retagged them because, as far I could see on Mapillary pictures, there is a gate barring access.

Private access, right?  If access is private, most routing engines will ignore them by default.
hsc666 (2026-02-11 17:33:26+00:00): OSM ist nicht das Grundbuchamt. Nutzungsrechte und private Daten werden nicht in OSM erfasst. Die Höhe des Hauses war ebenfalls mit 267 m nicht korrekt. CS daher reverted.
literan (2026-02-11 19:39:44+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1476181245 это не тротуар. И это https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1476181246 тоже не тротуар.

Почитайте, пожалуйста, определение тротуара и не вносите неверные данные. Исправлю.
Александр Синявский (2026-02-11 22:25:16+00:00): Вы можете считать это частью пешеходной джорожки Улицы Арбат, а я могу считать это частью тротуара Тролинский пеереулок. Не надо считать, что только ваше мнение истинно. 
Оба варианта никак не ухудшают отображение данных о местности.
literan (2026-02-12 07:58:10+00:00): а улицы АРбат не тротуаров. Тротуар - это пешеходная дорожка, расположенная вдоль проезжей части или отделенная от нее газоном. Не поперек, а вдоль проезжей части.

Для обозначения подобных соединительных отрезков имеется специальный тег footway=link

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:footway

Мое мнение тут ни при чем, это "мнение сообщества" и оно записано в вики.
literan (2026-02-12 07:58:42+00:00): "а улицы АРбат не тротуаров" = У улицы Арбат нет тротуаров
NeisBot (2026-02-10 13:48:41+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 19 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1476182970 v1 | 17 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/2323131442 v5

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178360957
NeisReview (2026-02-19 05:34:49+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/178387920
woodpeck_repair (2026-02-10 13:48:15+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 177704058, 177728831, 177737855, 177868451, 178115827, 178116536, 178116789, 178117271, 178130466, 178131719, 178133497, 178134273.
NeisBot (2026-02-10 13:51:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 16 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1476182970 v2 | 16 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178361086
NeisReview (2026-02-19 05:34:50+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/178387920
NeisBot (2026-02-10 13:54:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 31 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1476182970 v2 | 16 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1476185487 v1 | 14 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/2323131465 v7

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178361232
Ltrlg (2026-02-11 08:44:42+00:00): Vu le site web (et ce que j’ai lu sur le bâtiment), la résidence est dans le bâtiment « Climax ». Pourquoi l’avoir mis sur une pelouse 20 m plus loin ?
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2026-02-11 08:52:04+00:00): Bonjour,

Le node a été déplacé
Cordialement,
L'Equipe DB
Ltrlg (2026-02-11 10:05:18+00:00): Merci !
SafwatHalaby (2026-02-12 08:52:33+00:00): Good to see you again! I'll be reviewing the changes from time to time. 

Thank you for the contribution!
geomaniX (2026-02-11 20:33:21+00:00): Moin und Willkommen bei OSM!

Kurze Frage zu diesem Changeset: Warum die Hochstufung auf Tertiary?
Auch wenn es der Verlauf der Straße suggeriert, findet hier kein nennenswerter Durchgangsverkehr statt.
Der überwiegende Verkehr führt von und zu den angrenzenden Wohngebieten.

VG
geomaniX
JonasPisch (2026-02-13 08:39:48+00:00): Schönen guten Tag,

im Wesentlichen ging es hier um den Verkehr, der in die Stadt hineinführt. In diesem Zusammenhang habe ich mit einem Anwohner aus der Stadt gesprochen. Er berichtete, dass es im Bereich der Münsterstraße ein erhöhtes Aufkommen an Durchgangsverkehr gibt.

Bezüglich der August-Winkhaus-Straße gebe ich Ihnen recht. Ich habe die Einstufung entsprechend wieder auf „unclassified“ geändert.

VG
Jonas
JonasPisch (2026-02-13 08:40:59+00:00): *Münstertor
eggie (2026-02-10 14:31:18+00:00): Dag Menno,

Probeer svp op de bestaande  adresnodes bij te taggen. 
Nu ontbreekt belangrijke info om iets te vinden.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-02-10 14:36:39+00:00): Door in zo'n grootgebied te schuiven met de kaart verplaats je ongemerkt objecten.
Bv adressen of zo'n heg.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=178361507

Beter niet schuiven met de kaart en je gebied klein houden waar je in werkt.
MVG
eggie
Menno Arbouw (2026-02-11 13:52:26+00:00): Eggie,
bedankt voor je opmerkingen. Ik zal er terdege rekening mee houden en mijn werkwijze aanpassen.
Op korte termijn wil ik nog de laadpalen toevoegen, maar eerst meten en foto's maken.
NeisBot (2026-02-10 14:00:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 30 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1476182970 v3 | 17 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1476185487 v2 | 13 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/13540839970 v2
https://osm.org/node/13540830206 v2
https://osm.org/node/4948054380 v4

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178361526
DaveF (2026-02-10 21:08:28+00:00): It's not disused!
rhhs (2026-02-11 09:22:27+00:00): Are you sure it's access=no and not access=private? There must be a reason why that road is there...
MountHuila (2026-02-12 17:54:26+00:00): Hi rhhs,
I added access=no to this gate because it appears to be consistently closed in Mapillary (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=42.6165627272&lng=23.364391304207&z=17.975366355939702&pKey=699843529508177&focus=photo) and it looks latched without any visible automatic opening mechanism. Based on the imagery, it seems more like an extension of the fence rather than a regularly used access point, likely intended only for maintenance or utility services. The lift gates to the east (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6319080762) appear to function as the primary controlled entry and exit for the neighborhood, as also supported by Mapillary imagery (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=42.6167441463177&lng=23.365439921119105&z=17.975366355939702&pKey=697504713051265&focus=map&x=0.5065623090892195&y=0.5108036261094887&zoom=0). That said, if you have local knowledge or information suggesting otherwise, I’m more than happy to defer to your judgment. 
Thanks!
NeisBot (2026-02-10 14:09:39+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 17 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1476182970 v4 | 17 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178361899
NeisBot (2026-02-10 14:12:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 14 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1476185487 v3 | 14 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178362011
maptheworld2050 (2026-07-29 20:50:23+00:00): Hi, could you clarify what that Menards next to the airport hangar is for? If that really exists it could use a `description=*` or `note=*` tag with some further explanation, otherwise it just looks like a mapping mistake... I left a note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5425341
eggie (2026-02-10 14:28:36+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback De info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode. 
Fotmat phone aangepast met +31.. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
NeisBot (2026-02-10 14:21:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 16 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/905820902 v2 | 8 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1092868622 v1 | 8 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/8411945583 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178362478
NeisReview (2026-02-19 05:34:51+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/178363135
eggie (2026-02-10 14:29:39+00:00): Dit lijkt me oke.
NeisBot (2026-02-10 14:33:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13453181641 v4

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Bakery"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-19 05:34:33+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178753804
(Cleaned up leftovers from previous edits)
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-13 00:13:49+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13540954667
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/676109590

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NeisBot (2026-02-10 14:39:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/651021491 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Auto detailing salon"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-19 05:34:33+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178753806
(No visible changes after review)
eggie (2026-02-10 14:44:39+00:00): Dag Dirk,

De hoofdtag is amenity=charging_station Daarop kun je ook het aantal laadpunten  aangeveb.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station

Alleen zo'n paal doet niets in OSM.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-02-10 14:47:40+00:00): Laadpaal aangepast...  parkeervak toegevoegd.
TukkerDirk (2026-02-11 10:42:27+00:00): Hallo Eggie, bedankt voor je uitleg en voor het aanpassen. Ik snap het nu, ook na lezen over tags.

Uit de interface werd niet duidelijk duidelijk dat een top-level tag ontbreekt (en ook niet dat dat niet de bedoeling is of werkt). 

Maar nu weet ik hoe het werkt, bedankt!

Dirk
porfiriopaiz (2026-02-11 04:24:14+00:00): Hola.

Me parece loable que estés contribuyendo con OpenStreetMap para mejorar la calidad de los datos en Nicaragua... pero... ¿Podrías agregar un poco información útil a tus descripciones sobre los cambios que estás aplicando?

Saludos.
Porfirio Páiz
johnpercy (2026-03-30 07:58:51+00:00): From local knowledge I don't think this is a valid footpath. What the aerial imagery shows is an animal track at best.
⇄ john paul jones & gringo (2026-03-30 11:42:29+00:00): Hi, it’s certainly not a ‘Public Footpath’ by any means but it is a passable path. The tree-line is tricky but can be overcome with care, and with a gate at each end. I certainly wouldn’t recommend it in anything but the driest of times.
Hendrik Helsper (2026-02-11 22:20:44+00:00): Hallo upge56g,

Sind Ludwigsstraße und Alte Universitätsstraße seit neuestem Busstraßen? Eigentlich war das immer eine Fußgängerzone mit Linienverkehr frei.
Hendrik Helsper (2026-02-11 22:27:56+00:00): Außerdem hättest du, wenn die Fußgängerzone tatsächlich aufgehoben worden wäre, sie auch am Gutenbergplatz von der "Fahrbahn" entfernen müssen. In einer Fußgängerzone gibt es keine Fahrbahn.
upge56g (2026-02-12 05:59:27+00:00): Sorry, war mein Fehler. Ich hatte Linienverkehr frei nicht gesehen!
literan (2026-02-11 19:29:56+00:00): highway=pedestrian это пешеходные улицы (как Арбат). Этот проезд не является таковой, откачу.
Александр Синявский (2026-02-11 22:19:49+00:00): А панораму лень глянуть? Там также установлена "Пешеходная зона" как и на Арбате. Ситуации равнозначны как юридически, так и физически.
literan (2026-02-12 07:54:26+00:00): Еще раз, highway=pedestrian это пешеходные улицы (как Арбат). Этот проезд не является улицей, частью дорожно-уличной сети. Вне зависимости от установленных знаков.

Как еще объяснить?
swinetown (2026-02-10 15:33:29+00:00): *Commercial, even
eggie (2026-02-10 16:37:10+00:00): Dag Tim, 
De info heb ik samengevoegd met de al bestaande adresmode.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-02-10 16:19:14+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback Je kunt niet op grond van een schuingenomen luchtfoto een gebouw uitlijnen. Ook dakranden die uitsteken staan niet in de BAG. Dat is niet de positie waar het huis staat op maaihoogte.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
fortera_au (2026-02-10 23:58:12+00:00): Hi, ESRI imagery shows this driveway going through a building, can you please align it correctly?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178366608
apgosm (2026-02-12 10:05:29+00:00): Hi Team,
Apologies for the mistake. I have reverted the edit. Thank you for your valuable feedback. I will be more careful when editing the existing data in the future.
Thank you
Regards
Arya PG
eggie (2026-02-10 16:21:27+00:00): Zelfde verhaal.  Dat nieuwe stuk zou ook een overkapping kunnen zijn. Dan building=roof met lat-yer=1 apart intekenen. 
Dakranden is niet de plek waar het gebouw staat.
Gr eggie
eggie (2026-02-10 16:22:39+00:00): Je hebt van het gebouwe een muotipolygoon gemaakt.
eggie (2026-02-10 16:24:08+00:00): reverted by changeset #178368194

Ik heb het hier middels revert hersteld.
gurglypipe (2026-02-10 17:59:51+00:00): Hiya, what’s the reasoning for this change?

Generally it’s not correct to set the access= tag on a footway, because access= sets the access permissions for *all* vehicle types (motor vehicle, truck, hovercraft, foot, horse, etc.).

If this is a permissive footpath, then all that should be needed to mark it as such is foot=permissive.

bicycle=no and horse=no could be added to make it really clear they’re not allowed on this path (if that’s the case).

Hope that makes sense. Happy to discuss it further if I’ve misunderstood the situation! :)
gurglypipe (2026-02-13 16:31:36+00:00): I’ve reverted these changes as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178512903. If you don’t think that’s right, please say and we can collaborate on the best tagging :)
NTWindermerePaths (2026-02-14 10:51:22+00:00): Hi,

It's a permissive footpath to allow public to avoid the farmyard if there is moving machinery or livestock being handled. 
Incorrect tag was selected when inputting it. Thanks for updating it.
gurglypipe (2026-02-19 08:08:09+00:00): Great, it looks like it is now correctly tagged. Thanks for clarifying! :D
eggie (2026-02-10 16:29:31+00:00): De scouting was hier al getagd. Niet dubbel taggen svp. Er is ook al een adresnode.
De naam van het clubhuis heb ik laten staan.
Gr eggie
dmjab13 (2026-02-10 16:07:19+00:00): please do not submit changesets that span multiple continents!
Udarian (2026-02-10 19:06:59+00:00): also, looking at various aerial imagery I have doubts about the alignment of way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1476223639
apgosm (2026-02-12 09:26:41+00:00): Hi Team,
Apologies for the mistake. I have reverted the edit.Thank you for your valuable feedback. I will be more careful when editing the existing data in the future.
thank you, 
Regards 
Arya PG