piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Filip009 (2024-02-14 19:40:00+00:00): Okej, tak to nechám teda na teba a tvoju lokálnu znalosť, má teda vymazať všetky, čo si mi nazdieľal, alebo ako to odporúčaš urobiť? :)
yzal (2024-02-14 19:42:46+00:00): Čo som ti nalinkoval sú určite zbúrané a nie je po nich ani pamiatka. Tak sa môžu vymazať úplne, alebo nechať ako demolished:building=yes aby ich niekto náhodou nepridal.
Filip009 (2024-02-14 19:47:26+00:00): Okej, tak ich prerobím na demolished. Inak plánujem aj AB body v Prievidzi prehodiť do budov, máš tam nejaké tipy, na čo by som si mal dať pozor?
Filip009 (2024-02-14 19:49:12+00:00): A ako si tak rýchlo zistil, že som niečo upravil, máš zapnuté nejaké sledovanie changesetov v okolí? :)
yzal (2024-02-14 19:55:42+00:00): Pozerám sa na https://simon04.dev.openstreetmap.org/whodidit kto a čo sa mapuje v okolí a vidím že celé Bojnice zmenené.
Filip009 (2024-02-14 20:01:49+00:00): :D
yzal (2024-02-14 20:04:02+00:00): Čo sa týka Prievidze tak ma nejako nič nenapadá. Ale to by ma nenapadlo ani v Bojniciach, to si proste nemôže človek pamätať, že je niekde niečo zbúrané ale v katastri to je. 
Asi až keď to bude hotové a pozriem si changeset, tak si všimnem že niekde niečo pribudlo a potom budem vedieť či je tam niečo nové alebo sú len zlé dáta v katastri. 

Inak ja to potom môžem zmeniť. Len som chcel radšej napísať, aby sa nestalo, že pridávaš budovy a adresy a záhadne ti to mizne :D
Filip009 (2024-02-14 20:19:12+00:00): Okej :D S Bojnicami som skončil, sú celé tvoje. Už tam nemáš žiadnu adresu v bode bez vchodu. Sú tam ale adresy v building:part, čo by podľa mňa nemali byť, keďže súpisné číslo je pre každú budovu. Ale nechávam to na teba, či to necháš tak, alebo to prerobíš. :)
yzal (2024-02-14 21:10:17+00:00): Na tie adresy v building:part sa pozriem.
Akurát tie vchody na budove https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/49065368 nedávajú celkom zmysel, ale to nemôžeš vedieť. Tá budova je celkovo architektonicky zvláštne riešená a je tam toľko vchodov a prevádzok, že ani pán boh netuší k čomu presne majú byť tie adresy pridelené. A samozrejme žiadna tabuľka s číslom na budove.
Filip009 (2024-02-14 21:21:13+00:00): To nevadí, hlavne že sú v mape na cca dobrom mieste :)

Tie building part si vieš v RA zobraziť tak, že si zoradíš RA podľa way a väčšinou tie bez podfarbenia sú building:part.
yzal (2024-02-14 21:52:15+00:00): Z tej poslednej správy tohto veľa nechápem. Neviem čo je RA (žeby register adries?). Neviem kde/ako si ho zobraziť a zoradiť podľa way.
Filip009 (2024-02-14 21:56:24+00:00): Hej hej, register adries som myslel. Keď sú stiahneš Bojnice a zoradíš podľa W (way), tak navrchu budeš mať asi 10 nepodfarbených, čo znamená, že nemajú tie čiary tag building. (Máš do neho prístup, však?)
NeisBot (2024-03-19 15:45:48+00:00): Hello lyquanghuy289, thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.Please see https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments \n
Thanks!

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-08 18:34:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 148396825 where the changeset comment is: weitere leidige edits unerwünschter Sockenpuppen entfernt s. https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Global_ban_of_user_geocodec
cbeddow (2024-02-22 04:04:48+00:00): Nice edits! In case you are interested to help map sidewalks in Little Havana, please login with OSM to this project, or add any missing sidewalks elsewhere in the city too!

https://tasks.mapwith.ai/projects/164/tasks
gscholz (2024-02-29 06:40:45+00:00): Hi JazminRgz,
your recent activities around Guadalajara have left behind a lot of errors regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-103.35507&lat=20.62591&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=147461423

As you may know, this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps.
Can you please fix this?

You may also like to educate yourself about how to edit cycleways properly, which are a part of a road:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cycleway%3Dlane

Kind regards
Guido
Barroszt (2024-03-14 09:50:41+00:00): Gdzie dodane przeze mnie trawniki?
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-08 18:33:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 148396825 where the changeset comment is: weitere leidige edits unerwünschter Sockenpuppen entfernt s. https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Global_ban_of_user_geocodec
gscholz (2024-02-25 08:12:46+00:00): Hi JazminRgz,
your recent activities around Guadalajara have left behind a lot of  errors regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-103.35507&lat=20.62591&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=147462173

As you may know, this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps.
Can you please fix this?

You may also like to educate yourself about how to edit cycleways properly, which are a part of a road:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cycleway%3Dlane

Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2024-02-29 06:41:40+00:00): Hi JazminRgz,
these errors still exist, can I get your feedback here?
Guido
jnighan (2024-02-14 18:32:01+00:00): Move church tags from quasi-landuse area (although did not have landuse=religious) to building. In CT, religious institutions are only mapped as landuse areas when they are larger campuses of religious buildings. It is not used for a parcel with a single church structure and parking lot that is not different in character from the surrounding area
ti-lo (2024-03-23 00:26:34+00:00): What's the intention of this "historic monument" ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1250495950 If it's not static, the entry makes no sense https://starship-spacex.fandom.com/wiki/Booster_12_(B12)
Strubbl (2024-02-17 22:02:31+00:00): Gibts die Verkehrsgesellschaft Vorpommern-Rügen nicht mehr?
Protoxenus (2024-02-18 10:04:01+00:00): Die Frage kannst du dir sicherlich selbst beantworten. 
Ich habe alle einzelnen tags der Haltestellen-Elemente in die Relation gepackt.
Strubbl (2024-02-18 19:42:20+00:00): Ok danke, das hatte ich nicht gesehen.
Firefishy (2024-05-15 11:42:26+00:00): Please be careful, you mapped power lines here as residential roads. The mapping quality was very poor. Please only map features which are clear and definitely exist on the ground.
Brazil Singh (2024-05-15 11:45:51+00:00): Thank you for your alert! I will be carefull!
eggie (2024-02-14 19:02:45+00:00): 👍
eggie (2024-02-14 19:56:03+00:00): Dag info...  Gebouwen hebben al adresnodes. Dus beter niet nogmaals een adres toevoegen.
De naam van het gebouw is niet clubhuis en kleedkamers ONA. Dan kun je beter onder description =.... zetten.

Ik pas even wat aan.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-02-14 19:58:28+00:00): Je kun wel toevoegen club=sport sport=soccer
name=.... (clubnaam)
Реdактор (2024-02-14 18:54:51+00:00): https://docs.cntd.ru/document/461608601
Источник
Реdактор (2024-02-14 18:55:05+00:00): Прошу прощения забыл указать
literan (2025-07-29 07:06:40+00:00): статусы дорог в OSM присваиваются исходя из их значимости в дорожной сети, а не исходя из их официального статуса. Ознакомьтесь: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Highway_classification

дорога 03А-030 не яавляется "дорогой регионального значения, соединяющие крупные города и/или областные центры"
Jrachi (2024-02-15 09:12:47+00:00): Ciao.
Fai attenzione con iD (il benedetto editor online), hai modificato, immagino correttamente, l'incrocio tra provinciale, via Roma e Via Piea.
Su questo incrocio convergono quattro percorsi a catasto, 301, 302, 309A e 309B che devono unirsi, non necessariamente sullo stesso punto ma devono avere una continuità
Con le tue modifiche hai mantenuto il punto di unione tra 301, 302 e 309A, ma hai separato il 309B e interrotto il 309A
Per farlo hai collegato una way alla via Roma che non è parte di nessun percorso.
Ho visto sulle Bing che Via Roma sembra essere a senso unico, verso l'incrocio.
Puoi verificare e provare a sistemare le relazioni?
Se non riesci scrivimi.
Ivo, Jrachi
DD1GJ (2024-02-15 07:44:01+00:00): Änderung zurückgesetzt. Falls erforderlich, bitte https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5313840280/history anpassen.

Sachlich neutrale Einträge sind erwünscht, Werbeprosa ist verpönt.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf
Fraxi (2025-11-07 19:13:53+00:00): Мите, сигурен ли си за размера(а и наличието) на такава зарядна станция? Това, което се вижда на снимките на редактора и е оградено с такива габарити(w1250505088), е по-скоро автобуса. Защото тази вечер на това място беше спрял един автобус. Може и там да зарежда, но не видях никаква апаратура, маркучи и др. 
Ако става въпрос за такива като w1250592579, то не си спомням да видях от северната страна уличен шкаф или трафопост. Може нещо да не разбирам.
Dimitar155 (2025-11-07 19:48:19+00:00): Да, сигурен съм и за двете неща. Същата като станцията в Гоце Делчев е. Единствената разлика е че шкафовете са в зелените площи до ухото, тъй като там има втора такава станция.
emersonveenstra (2024-02-15 11:56:19+00:00): Hi there,

When creating waterway relations like https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17213527, only waterways should be added, not river areas like  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/263888362

Would you mind removing that from the relation? Thanks!
mueschel (2024-02-17 11:49:50+00:00): Hi,
"inscription_1:en" is a tag not used up to now. The common numbering scheme for long inscriptions uses a colon like in "inscription:1" and, when combined with a language "inscription:en:1". 
I just fixed a couple of these.
b-unicycling (2024-02-17 12:00:46+00:00): Danke! I might have to change a couple more. That's the trouble when using OSMAnd, it doesn't know these things.
maraf24 (2024-02-15 11:58:49+00:00): Cześć
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/241722204
To chyba nie jest ground, skoro tracktype jest grade2? Poprzednia wartość unpaved bardziej pasowala.
Strubbl (2024-02-17 22:11:27+00:00): Die stop_position ist nicht auf dem Radweg, da fährt der Bus normal nicht: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/674972361
Protoxenus (2024-02-18 09:47:37+00:00): Hast natürlich recht, blöder Fehler. Danke für den Hinweis.
AayushChand123 (2024-02-29 16:05:42+00:00): Hi.
You are doing great.
Please keep in mind that there should probably be a feature like bridge or ford in intersection of a road and a waterway.
Thank you for mapping :)
Ashim Paudel (2024-02-29 16:21:28+00:00): Hi @AayushChand123
Thank you for reminding me. I will make sure this won't happen next time;)
Christopher (2024-02-17 21:01:59+00:00): Hallo, ich hab gesehen, du hast in Stangenhagen an der Haltestelle Trebbiner Straße teilweise eine Einbahnstaße draus gemacht. Seit wann ist das so? Ich war am 10.2. vor Ort, dort war nichts von Einbahnstraße zu sehen, ist die Einbahnstraße für Radfaherer frei?
Christopher
woodpeck_repair (2024-02-14 19:32:07+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 145244923, 145256922, 145283298, 145285721, 145290918, 145327267, 145366211, 145399898, 145403846, 145411871, 145434835, 145462433, 145494834, 145530312, 145565284, 145566265, 145621501, 145651028, 145653913, 145656935, 145693393, 145703344, 145723593, 145736366, 145757036, 145760023, 145876213, 145886307, 145912809, 145923774, 145986714, 146000097, 146025314, 146061982, 146063703, 146072255, 146098249, 146132724, 146143914, 146147315, 146211012, 146241765, 146278169, 146280759, 146319760, 146358405, 146396510, 146400975, 146409173, 146409312, 146435494, 146436254, 146439377, 146447205, 146472460, 146484873, 146503802, 146504155, 146521786, 146540461, 146548873, 146556339, 146587303, 146616982, 146617113, 146617706, 146623733, 146624681, 146668034, 146699516, 146704063, 146704887, 146706037, 146712303, 146736960, 146738815, 146740306, 146751511, 146778641, 146782538, 146788757, 146788881, 146789043, 146816256, 146817114, 146856613, 146857986, 146866896.
Frans S (2024-02-16 09:01:06+00:00): Hola. Gracias por la cartografía.

Cuando un camino/carretera cruza un curso de agua, añade un cruce/puente/culvert al nodo.

Nunca dejes que una carretera termine en un nodo de otras características como áreas de uso del suelo o edificios. Simplemente deténgase delante de ella.
Hello. Thanks for mapping.
When a path/road crosses a waterway, add a crossing/bridge/culvert to the node.
Never let a highway end on a node of other features like landuse areas or buildings. Just stop in front of it.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-02-14 20:10:26+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10572698486
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11624293347
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/676379033
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/279360020

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
4004 (2024-02-25 01:58:56+00:00): Добрый день, спасибо за правку.
барьеры должны быть точками на линии - редактор также должен был показывать вам об этом предупреждение. иначе навигаторы не могут их учесть
Barroszt (2024-04-03 22:14:44+00:00): Dziwaczne, jak nie wiem co! To nawet nie Toruń!
JLZIMMERMANN (2024-02-15 22:10:13+00:00): pouvez-vous SVP penser à mettre un résumé dans vos enregistrements (changeset)
de type :
FR13,CHATEAURENARD : .......
Alexmol (2024-02-14 20:34:31+00:00): Na fonte deverá ler-se: Survey by cellmapper telegram group users and aerial view
Bobropiton (2024-03-04 09:39:42+00:00): Приветствую. Остановки, которые временно не работают, обозначайте, пожалуйста, через disused:*
olo81 (2024-02-16 14:04:25+00:00): Wycofane, nie dodajemy historycznych miejsc które już nie istnieją i są zniwelowane. 
To co istnieje poprawiłem i odpowiednio otagowałem.
olo81 (2024-02-16 13:35:27+00:00): landuse=quarry to nie jest prochownia, kolejna sprawa, jeśli jest budynek który jest prochownią to dlaczego dodajesz kolejny punkt z nazwą? nie powielamy obiektów, nazw.
Azharul Islam Anik (2024-02-21 15:57:38+00:00): A road crossing through a building has been fixed. Way: 513730200
Lelio Alves (2024-02-27 12:47:10+00:00): Thank you!
ForestFurnace (2024-02-14 21:16:27+00:00): Is this actually one non-rectangular building? It looks like there are two separate gabled roof rectangular buildings next to each other (and possibly a third little one).
olo81 (2024-02-16 13:23:18+00:00): "Dawne nadanie górnicze" to nie jest nazwa. Jeśli kopalnia została zlikwidowana dajesz odpowiednie tagowanie
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:landuse=quarry?uselang=pl
olo81 (2024-02-16 13:23:36+00:00): Czy ta kopalnia została zlikwidowana?
Kovoschiz (2024-02-15 16:12:15+00:00): Please don't add brackets and such descriptive labels. `name=` is for the proper name only. Use `description=` if truly needed.
olo81 (2024-02-16 13:32:41+00:00): punkt wywalony, dodany opis i tagowanie historyczne do nasypu
Barroszt (2024-06-24 12:52:48+00:00): Teraz nie jest ogarnięte osiedle mieszkaniowe. Ale będzie! Powstrzymam rządy okrutnego cara, który prowadzi niemiecki Imperializm i przywrócę królewski porządek, tym bardziej że znajduje się niezwykle blisko dworca kolejowego i centrum handlowego, przecież to nie jest wiocha! Oby nie szkodził dalej naszemu miastu!
Barroszt (2024-06-24 12:56:03+00:00): To jest jakiś skandal i człowiek, który był odpowiedzialny za przeprowadzenie tej operacji powinien ponieść surowe konsekwencje za dokonywanie edycji, które przyniosły zupełnie odwrotny efekt od żądanego! Tyle bezbronnych, niewinnych budynków i innych obiektów poszło w zapomnienie, pamiętam o Was i nie pozwolę na niszczenie naszych zasobów!
Barroszt (2024-06-24 12:58:05+00:00): Podsumowując: Łatwo obniżyć jakość map jakiegoś obszaru, np. osiedla, uwzględnianie detali, takich jak, np. parkingi, latarnie, barierki, itd. już NIE.
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-08 18:33:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 148396825 where the changeset comment is: weitere leidige edits unerwünschter Sockenpuppen entfernt s. https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Global_ban_of_user_geocodec
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-08 18:33:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 148396825 where the changeset comment is: weitere leidige edits unerwünschter Sockenpuppen entfernt s. https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Global_ban_of_user_geocodec
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-08 18:34:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 148396825 where the changeset comment is: weitere leidige edits unerwünschter Sockenpuppen entfernt s. https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Global_ban_of_user_geocodec
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-08 18:34:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 148396825 where the changeset comment is: weitere leidige edits unerwünschter Sockenpuppen entfernt s. https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Global_ban_of_user_geocodec
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-08 18:34:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 148396825 where the changeset comment is: weitere leidige edits unerwünschter Sockenpuppen entfernt s. https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Global_ban_of_user_geocodec
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-08 18:34:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 148396825 where the changeset comment is: weitere leidige edits unerwünschter Sockenpuppen entfernt s. https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Global_ban_of_user_geocodec
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-08 18:33:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 148396825 where the changeset comment is: weitere leidige edits unerwünschter Sockenpuppen entfernt s. https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Global_ban_of_user_geocodec
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-08 18:34:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 148396825 where the changeset comment is: weitere leidige edits unerwünschter Sockenpuppen entfernt s. https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Global_ban_of_user_geocodec
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-08 18:33:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 148396825 where the changeset comment is: weitere leidige edits unerwünschter Sockenpuppen entfernt s. https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Global_ban_of_user_geocodec
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-08 18:34:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 148396825 where the changeset comment is: weitere leidige edits unerwünschter Sockenpuppen entfernt s. https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Global_ban_of_user_geocodec
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-08 18:34:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 148396825 where the changeset comment is: weitere leidige edits unerwünschter Sockenpuppen entfernt s. https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Global_ban_of_user_geocodec
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-08 18:33:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 148396825 where the changeset comment is: weitere leidige edits unerwünschter Sockenpuppen entfernt s. https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Global_ban_of_user_geocodec
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-08 18:34:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 148396825 where the changeset comment is: weitere leidige edits unerwünschter Sockenpuppen entfernt s. https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Global_ban_of_user_geocodec
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-08 18:33:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 148396825 where the changeset comment is: weitere leidige edits unerwünschter Sockenpuppen entfernt s. https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Global_ban_of_user_geocodec
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-08 18:33:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 148396825 where the changeset comment is: weitere leidige edits unerwünschter Sockenpuppen entfernt s. https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Global_ban_of_user_geocodec
pesec (2024-02-15 07:40:17+00:00): Доброго дня.
внимательнее с тегами, поправил.
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-08 18:33:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 148396825 where the changeset comment is: weitere leidige edits unerwünschter Sockenpuppen entfernt s. https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Global_ban_of_user_geocodec
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-08 18:34:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 148396825 where the changeset comment is: weitere leidige edits unerwünschter Sockenpuppen entfernt s. https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Global_ban_of_user_geocodec
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-08 18:34:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 148396825 where the changeset comment is: weitere leidige edits unerwünschter Sockenpuppen entfernt s. https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Global_ban_of_user_geocodec
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-08 18:33:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 148396825 where the changeset comment is: weitere leidige edits unerwünschter Sockenpuppen entfernt s. https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Global_ban_of_user_geocodec
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-08 18:34:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 148396825 where the changeset comment is: weitere leidige edits unerwünschter Sockenpuppen entfernt s. https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Global_ban_of_user_geocodec
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-08 18:34:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 148396825 where the changeset comment is: weitere leidige edits unerwünschter Sockenpuppen entfernt s. https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Global_ban_of_user_geocodec
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-08 18:34:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 148396825 where the changeset comment is: weitere leidige edits unerwünschter Sockenpuppen entfernt s. https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Global_ban_of_user_geocodec
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-08 18:34:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 148396825 where the changeset comment is: weitere leidige edits unerwünschter Sockenpuppen entfernt s. https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Global_ban_of_user_geocodec
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-08 18:33:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 148396825 where the changeset comment is: weitere leidige edits unerwünschter Sockenpuppen entfernt s. https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Global_ban_of_user_geocodec
JanB27 (2024-03-23 22:52:32+00:00): Wieso genau wurde hier der neu gebaute Weg, den ich am 2.2. schon mit einem Track erfasst habe, wieder entfernt?
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-08 18:33:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 148396825 where the changeset comment is: weitere leidige edits unerwünschter Sockenpuppen entfernt s. https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Global_ban_of_user_geocodec
jcarlson (2024-02-26 17:58:53+00:00): what exactly are the "trunk il standards" you're referencing?

there's been very little discussion on the wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Illinois/Highway_Classification), and not as much IL-specific chatter on the OSMUS Slack, but it seemed like folks wanted to consider trunk from a connectivity standpoint over any physical attributes.
nickvet419 (2024-02-26 22:12:10+00:00): Basically, it is saying it would need to built like a grade seporated highway but with some at grade intersections.