piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Etzharai (2024-12-25 18:52:18+00:00): Pido disculpas entonces, no sabía que podría dar problemas y me parecía interesante poder mapear las cuencas hidrográficas, por lo que pueda ayudar en mantenimiento de los ríos y de inundaciones y tal. Pero si va a causar más problemas que soluciones dejo de hacerlo y paso a otra cosa.
Hugoren Martinako (2024-12-25 19:13:03+00:00): Tienes este visor: https://waterwaymap.org/, para justo lo que intentas con esa relación.
urbalazs (2024-01-13 08:50:56+00:00): Szia tregec! Ezt a módosításcsomagot visszaállítottam, mert a Gál Ispán utca a fővárosi közterületnév-jegyzékben és az utcatáblán is nagy I-vel van írva.
tregec (2024-01-13 11:56:17+00:00): Szia!
Valójában egyetlen táblán van csak nagy I-vel, az összes többin kicsivel van.
urbalazs (2024-01-13 19:49:56+00:00): Ha mindenképpen szeretnéd felvinni a kis i-vel írt alakot is, akkor az alt_name kulcsba megadhatod. De a name kulcs értéke maradjon a hivatalos nagy I-vel írt változat.
tregec (2024-01-13 20:16:59+00:00): Visszajavítom kis i-re a nevet, mert a közterületnév-jegyzékben is így van:
https://budapest.hu/Lapok/Szolgaltatas/fovarosi-kozteruletnev-jegyzek.aspx
Nem tudom honnan szedted a nagybetűs alakot.
Ezen kívül az Iskola téri szakasznak nem is ez a neve, hanem Iskola tér. Ezt is kijavítom.
urbalazs (2024-01-13 23:27:04+00:00): Hm... igazad van. Most már én sem tudom, honnan szedtem. Jó lesz akkor így. Köszi!
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-12 20:30:26+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11511993342

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eggie (2024-01-12 21:35:07+00:00): Dag tarantuli... Ik heb de 'knoop' uit het vlak footway gehaald. gehaald. 
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=146194714

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-01-12 21:33:50+00:00): Dag Aglaope  Ik heb parking=surface verwijderd.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=146195290
MVG
eggie
VLD549 (2024-03-20 15:28:07+00:00): Hi, I recently learned that in the case of Voetwegen, we need to put the name of the voetweg first, and then the number. Therefore: Voetweg 45 - Peerdekensveldweg  --> Peerdekensveldweg - Voetweg 45.

Please elaborate.
Thank you!
VLD549 (2024-03-14 12:10:04+00:00): Hi,

After checking with someone, because I didn't know, I understood that the name should be mentioned first, and then the administrative number. 
Therefore: Voetweg 34 - Broekveldweg  --> Broekveldweg - Voetweg 34
Could you elaborate on this? Thank you.
TomPar (2024-01-13 03:28:42+00:00): Good to see you back on here.  I see you had review requested checked.  The new way you added was unconnected to at one end, and where it intersected another existing way, it didn't connect there also.  No biggie.  Cheers.
KaitCam (2024-01-15 14:08:42+00:00): Thanks for the review; I am enjoying the process of learning.
NeisBot (2024-01-13 00:23:18+00:00): Hello WestBam_Ukr, thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.

Thanks!

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
BCNorwich (2024-09-05 06:41:52+00:00): Hi, These areas aren't houses they are residential areas. They should be reduced to individual house areas.

Regards Bernard.
user_20554852 (2024-01-12 21:31:36+00:00): Bei den Kommentar zu deiner Änderung am besten Angeben was du gemacht hast. In diesem Fall wäre das Adresse angepasst und Details zum Gebäude ergänzt.
Marek-M (2024-01-13 13:20:38+00:00): Cześć, chyba poprzednia kategoria drogi (dojazdowa) bardziej tutaj pasuje. Droga chyba nie ma dużego znaczenia w komunikacji.
theDM (2024-01-13 13:31:38+00:00): Cześć. W sumie miałem dylemat nad kategorią i nie wiem czy service na renderze nie jest za "wąskie". Drogi w okolicy mają unclassified, więc się tym zasugerowałem. 
Ta boczna jezdnia nie ma za dużego znaczenia. Od ponad roku prawy pas służy za parking dla ciężarówek, a lewy do jazdy. Nie wiem jednak czy tam nie jeździ jakiś autobus.
Marek-M (2024-01-13 15:08:34+00:00): Autobusy dojazdowymi też mogą jeździć.
Na pewno unclassified tutaj nie spowoduje, że nawigacje powariują i na nią puszczą cały ruch samochodowy zamiast na drogę 89, więc nie ma co tego traktować jako ważny problem.

Osobiście jednak zostałbym przy kategorii service :)
theDM (2024-01-13 18:15:33+00:00): Zauważyłem, że service się renderowało na bardzo cienką linię, której nie było widać nawet przy niedużym oddaleniu, więc to poprawiłem. Osobiście się nie upieram co do tej kategorii i service też nie byłoby błędem, poza kwestią renderowania.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-12 21:50:45+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11512173572

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
user_20554852 (2024-01-12 21:56:03+00:00): Leider wurde die Ladesäule nicht verschoben sondern gelöscht. Das ist nicht schön. ich würde das entsprechend rückgänig machen und anpassen. okay?
user_20554852 (2024-01-12 22:08:53+00:00): In der vorhanden, waren Details schon erfasst. Ich habe deine Änderungen rückgängig gemacht und die vorhandene Entsprechend verschoben.
s8evq (2024-01-12 21:54:50+00:00): I meant Kettenis instead of Kelmis in my changeset comment
s_SoNick (2024-01-13 05:40:40+00:00): Hello, you appear to have made changes as far ranging as Mexico and Montana in the same edit. In the future, please save your changes in one area before continuing to make changes in another area.
jtracey (2024-01-12 22:44:33+00:00): For future reference, it's preferred if edits are kept to geographically smaller areas (say about the size of a city, depending on what's being edited, though there's no exact rule--larger edits are fine for rural or large features like highways, smaller is better for details like curb heights). It looks like this has changes around Edmonton and Waterloo, which makes the changeset area include everything between those two cities.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-01-13 22:56:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 146229659 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some fantasy editing in Canada.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15573
A26-FFFARM (2024-01-12 22:07:47+00:00): SanYoK!
RedEyedVireo (2024-01-14 00:20:10+00:00): Hi,

I think you might want to expand the power plant grounds to include the building on the right.

I think the left building has the actual generators and the right one does some kind of processing of the fuel. Or a least that's where all the big dump trucks are being unloaded every time I drive past.

Also I was looking at  wounder if there is some why of indicating a biomass storage site on OSM since these people store big piles of chipped wood for burning here: https://osm.org/go/ZfC9f_W0x-?m=

Let me know if you have any questions.

RedEyedVireo
charmaine_dalisay (2024-01-16 16:58:59+00:00): Thanks for pointing that out, I'll make that change!
RedEyedVireo (2024-01-16 18:19:15+00:00): Excellent! Thank you.

RedEyedVireo
VLD549 (2024-03-08 12:52:17+00:00): Hi, can you explain the name change Tankstation & Carwash Voerendaal to Gulf Voerendaal  ?? The website as a source doesn't work and Facebook mentions the name Tankstation & Carwash.

Thank you!
A67-A67 (2024-03-08 16:11:15+00:00): Hi,
Tankstation & Carwash isn't a name but a description.
VLD549 (2024-03-14 11:58:47+00:00): Thank you.
Mohameddahirdd (2024-02-27 02:32:41+00:00): Hello world
Harry Wood (2024-02-27 16:45:09+00:00): Hi Mohameddahirdd. Did you have a comment about this changeset?
Metzor (2024-01-13 08:38:52+00:00): Hallo gaiberger,

Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap! Schön, dass du hier mitmachst :-)

Hier in der Änderungssatz-Diskussion kann man dem Editierenden Fragen zu den Änderungen stellen oder Hinweise geben, wie das Mapping noch besser wäre.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:%C3%84nderungssatz#%C3%84nderungssatz-Diskussionen

In deinem Fall hat mich ein Qualitätssicherungstool darauf aufmerksam gemacht, dass eine Straße einen sehr engen Knick macht. Du hast wohl ausversehen einen Knoten verschoben. Das kannst du hier nachvollziehen:
https://osmcha.org/changesets/146197789/

Da es eine Kreisstraße ist, habe ich es gleich korrigiert:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146206079

Falls du auf dem Smartphone/Tablett editierst: Da gibt es meiner Meinung nach Tools, die es einfacher machen, versehentliches Verschieben zu verhindern.

Schöne Grüße und bei Fragen gerne fragen :-)
Metzor
Metzor (2024-01-13 10:33:53+00:00): Hallo gaiberger,

Ich habe noch bemerkt, dass du einen Review deiner Änderung angefragt hast.

Die Öffnungszeiten waren nicht mehr maschinenlesbar. Ich habe das angepasst und teils in das description-Tag verschoben:
https://osmcha.org/changesets/146208758/#map=19/48.95694/9.13567&layers=N

oder die gesamte Historie:
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/node/2938849706

Die Doku zum opening_hours Tag findest du hier: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours/specification
Ich kann mir das nicht merken, deshalb nutze ich Vespucci mit seiner schönen Eingabemaske für Öffnungszeiten. Die StreetComplete-App kann das auch sehr gut.

Schönes Wochenende
Metzor
filler_avenue (2024-01-12 22:47:45+00:00): Не знаю что там с автомусным маршрутом, что-то менять надо.
Cebderby (2024-01-13 17:36:55+00:00): So is the road permanently 10 mph speed limit then?  It was signed as 10 mph during the adjacent building works because of the construction - hence maxspeed:type=construction.
Nathan_A_RF (2024-01-13 21:10:46+00:00): That isn't a correct tag for a speed limit. I thought I did add a note saying "Temporary speed limit due to roadworks" but I must have forgot or it didn't add properly. I'll add it now.
watmildon (2024-01-20 02:00:25+00:00): The trees really do make it seem more lively. Nice work!
Dimitar155 (2024-01-15 21:40:36+00:00): Привет!

Какъв е източника за името на този връх, както и на съседните? Прави ми впечатление че постоянно добавяте имената им, а други потребители постоянно ги премахват.

Поздрави,
Митко
NeisBot (2024-01-13 00:23:17+00:00): Hello n0stal6ic, thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.

Thanks!

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
watmildon (2024-01-20 02:23:21+00:00): If you want to go even deeper mapping the elementary school adding the "pitches" on the blacktop (four square, basketball,etc) and there's even a key for the map they've drawn: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:playground%3Dmap
maraf24 (2024-04-06 10:35:10+00:00): Budynek NIE jest wyburzony, co dobrze widać na załączonym zdjęciu.
eggie (2024-01-13 14:57:00+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
mcliquid (2024-01-13 07:14:29+00:00): Hi,

please note: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
limes11 (2024-01-13 07:52:46+00:00): Also, something went wrong here:

In several cases, you added the tag not only to the way containing the amenity=cinemay-tag, but to every node on the way. E.g.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/46612742

and the 19 nodes it constitutes.

Please check this.
Metzor (2024-01-13 08:19:25+00:00): Hi Pieter,

Where is the link to the discussion of this mechanical edit? Thanks.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct#Document_and_discuss_your_plans

Have a nice weekend
Metzor
Pieter Vander Vennet (2024-01-13 12:10:54+00:00): @mcliquid: Yes, I know that changes are supposed to be local. However, for such a mechanical edit where tagging is changed in a large scale, I think that having it all at once is better.

@limes11 Oops, sorry about this. I cleaned this up in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146211977

@Metzor: Yeah, I know it isn't very polite of me doing such a mechanical edit without discussing this first. I'm afraid of ending up in hours of countless discussions about every possible nuance of the tag, and I simply don't have the time nor energy to deal with this...

However, this is a completely reversable edit (this is a single extra tag which is added and can be deleted just as easy)
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-01-20 10:36:25+00:00): If you have no time for discussing global mechanical edits, then please avoid making global mechanical edits.

Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146473188

(note that this kind of edits results in adding more procedures/requirements around mechanical edits which burdens people actually following this rules)
gileri (2024-01-21 23:10:13+00:00): I'm of the opinion of Pieter Vander Vennet. Having to take more than an hour for the process of such a simple changeset would be detrimental in my opinion. We are talking a one-time edit of 100 objects, revertable trivially.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-01-23 14:32:58+00:00): Feel free to discuss changing https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct with OSM community
gileri (2024-01-24 20:42:21+00:00): I've already done so in the past.

I'm just balancing out the discussion here, and pointing out that not everyone is in favor of this AE Code of Conduct as-is.

As far as I (and wiki history) know, it was not even introduced through a vote or preliminary discussion, and not required to abide to when signing up. So those are good guidelines, not laws.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-01-24 22:07:31+00:00): Fell free to discuss whether it can be freely ignored or not. I am pretty sure that answer is "no".
Filip009 (2024-01-13 20:43:05+00:00): Zdravím, jedná sa o značenú trasu https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17019168?
Narušiteľ (2024-01-15 07:48:40+00:00): ano
Filip009 (2024-01-15 07:53:34+00:00): Tak prosím pridajte tagy farby a osmc:symbol podobne ako sú na tejto trase https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14042516
adas (2024-06-18 08:58:11+00:00): Miasto wybrało trasę przez Chocimską. Czyli wtedy trasa wzdłuż Artyleryjskiej nie będzie realizowana. To może ją wyrzucić z mapy?
Tjuro (2024-02-12 09:44:17+00:00): Beste Jorik “GingerLionXx” Seisveld,

Ik zie dat je hier een aantal fietspaden hebt toegoevoegd, zou je kunnen toelichten wat voor bord deze fietspaden hebben?

Veder kan ik op sommige stukken alleen maar gras zien, zijn deze fietspaden al gerealiseerd of zijn deze in aanbouw?

Met vriendelijke groet,

Tjuro
Jorik “GingerLionXx” Seisveld (2024-02-12 10:00:53+00:00): Allemaal g19. Ja is recent gerealiseerd.
Tjuro (2024-02-12 10:07:08+00:00): G19, bedoel je mogelijk G11?
Jorik “GingerLionXx” Seisveld (2024-02-12 10:28:16+00:00): Ja sorry G11 was er met mijn hoofd niet helemaal bij.
emersonveenstra (2024-01-15 14:05:49+00:00): Hi there,

Thanks for mapping!

When you map crossings, please don't mix them with stops like https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3444504033. Instead, the crossing node should be at the point where pedestrians cross, and the stop node should be at the point where cars stop. Hope this helps!
emersonveenstra (2024-01-20 15:30:18+00:00): fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146483158
marc__marc (2026-02-12 21:24:57+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1239214993
que veux dire (WOW/Dorp) dans le nom ?
Ardennen8 (2026-02-12 22:25:44+00:00): Noms des établissements scolaires:

Contact: https://www.slw.be/contact.html

WOW: https://www.slw.be/WOW_ACTIVITEITEN.html

Dorp: https://www.slw.be/DORP_ACTIVITEITEN.html
marc__marc (2026-02-13 07:15:28+00:00): Merci pour ton retour.
dans ce cas il faut faire un objet pour Wow, de la même manière qu'il y a un objet pour Drop https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12091436
marc__marc (2026-02-13 08:49:44+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178490074
Allison P (2024-01-13 21:08:03+00:00): Oops, this is Dry Creek Ranch
MxxCon (2024-01-15 20:34:35+00:00): Hello.
Rather than compeltely deleting this POI, it's must better to use lifecycle prefixes as documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix, or at the very least delete biz-specific info, but leave address tags intact. Doing that preserves the history of this object, if there's ever a need to refer to that in the future.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146200051
IsStatenIsland (2024-01-18 00:38:46+00:00): Agreed. The address point should remain. Reverted in #146385430
yasslay (2024-02-15 18:17:39+00:00): Hello Nathan,

I know that this changeset was made a month ago, but the ref tagging is still incorrect and requires discussion.

The "A8(M)" is signed as the M8 or (A8) on the ground so the ref=M8, destination:ref=A8 and highway_authority_ref=A8(M).

The highway tagging should be highway=motorway_link in my opinion as the spur is minor and links to two major motorways. I'm not too concerned about this though.

Any feedback would be appreciated.

Best wishes,
yasslay
Nathan_A_RF (2024-02-15 18:30:24+00:00): Hi, only C-roads and U-roads in the UK should really use the tag highway_authority_ref. Regardless of what the sign says, the ref as stated in the reference I tagged on the ways is A8(M). Signage was probably only changed for simplicity, however the ref hasn't. There's likely lots of examples of this, whether intentional or whether down to botched/incorrect signage. As for the tagging, I feel highway=motorway is more appropriate, as the A8(M) has it's own number outright.
yasslay (2024-02-15 18:34:09+00:00): Hi Nathan,

I understand and saw the source you added. I know that the A8(M) number applies to the spur in question.

We have a similar situation with the A57(M) and A635(M) in Manchester where I tagged it as such a few months ago. I feel that the same should be applied here. 

Best wishes,
Yasslay
Nathan_A_RF (2024-02-15 18:58:32+00:00): Signage does not denote road numbers, official documents do. I'm not familiar with the numbering in Manchester so I can't comment on that. The destination and destination:ref tags here already contain the necessary information given by road signs, including the refs M8 and (M73).
Marek-M (2024-01-18 06:59:13+00:00): Świetne edycje! Dzięki :)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-01-13 01:22:02+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 145844404, 145844430, 145844444, 145844453, 145844472, 145844525, 145844541, 145844562, 145844571, 145844599, 145844610, 145844618, 145844632, 145849324, 145849519, 146112087, 146112104, 146112122, 146112146, 146112170, 146112191, 146112214, 146112244, 146112279, 146112319, 146112346, 146112366, 146112376, 146112387, 146112396, 146112420, 146112443, 146112465, 146112474, 146112482, 146112571, 146112617, 146112641, 146112665, 146112747, 146112772, 146112795, 146112810, 146112819, 146112841, 146112859, 146112872, 146112887, 146112900, 146112913, 146112927, 146112953, 146112982, 146112999, 146113050, 146113095, 146113112, 146113136, 146113150, 146113162, 146113173, 146113252, 146113268, 146113275, 146113311, 146113339, 146113345, 146113353, 146113359, 146113386, 146113402, 146113417, 146113429, 146113441, 146113461, 146113477, 146113513, 146113537, 146113558, 146113568, 146113578, 146113587, 146113601, 146113612, 146113617, 146113632, 146113645, 146113654, 146113691, 146113702, 146113717, 146113735, 146113747, 146113755, 146113767, 146113783, 146113824, 146113843.
archpdx (2024-01-13 04:03:41+00:00): I believe Magnolia being secondary here makes more sense as it's important to distinguish Magnolia from other surrounding primary roads such as Beach and Brookhurst. Those streets get a lot more traffic, which is evident by how they have three or even four lanes in each direction as opposed to just two.
mtmail (2024-01-14 13:31:18+00:00): The restaurant's address in in India. The map shows the place in the United States. Are you sure you have local knowledge?
mtmail (2024-01-14 13:36:10+00:00): I do like your verbose messages. A lot of OSM mappers just write "update" or "I created a place" which gets boring reading 100 times.
Ramsiva (2024-01-14 16:35:07+00:00): I am extremely sorry for the error.  I meant the Flower Drum Restaurant in Chennai (which I was familiar with and including personal knowledge not the one in Ohio.) but I should have checked the location before uploading the data.  Thanks for pointing out my mistake, which I had to correct immediately.  Once again sorry for the error.
Anonix35 (2024-01-31 14:43:11+00:00): Are you sure that the connexion Saslong Monte Pana always existe ? 
I passed by a few days ago and a net blocked the way
Ewen Hill (2024-01-13 22:44:38+00:00): Excellent work on the bike path updates Sweeoon. I didn't even know about this route.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146202561
i2004 (2024-01-14 01:01:54+00:00): te agrege una parada mas del 60 a corregir
CurlingMan13 (2024-01-14 03:07:49+00:00): Please do not perform tests on the live OSM server.  This is not allowed.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146202943
mcliquid (2024-01-13 07:13:56+00:00): Hi,

please note: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
maraf24 (2024-01-14 22:31:15+00:00): Skoro nie działa to nie jest to na pewno man_made=works.
Jak się oznacza zabytki jest na wiki. Takie tagowanie jak teraz może na razie być.
ivanbranco (2024-01-13 15:52:02+00:00): Hi stiker1, could you please add a changeset comment, especially with such big changeset areas and deleted elements? See: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Good_changeset_comments
Nine-tailed (2024-02-13 19:07:15+00:00): Страйкер, поаккуратней при изменении мультиков, в некоторых были перепутаны роли
silversurfer83 (2024-01-13 17:39:39+00:00): Hi there :)

you didn't give a source for this edit so I'd like to ask: How do you know this?

cheers
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146203649
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-13 06:10:13+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/955785318

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
WieKo68 (2024-01-13 10:43:15+00:00): POPRAWIONE. Ciągle obiecuję sobie, że poprawię skrypt generujący dane