piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2024-05-27 07:18:26+00:00): De brug heb ik teruggeplaatst. Deze zal niet routeren,
In OSM is iedereen vrij om zaken toe te voegen.
Iets verwijderen ligt gevoeliger. Wat is het probleem hier?

MVG
eggie
BertusvanderPavert (2024-05-27 09:41:49+00:00): Deze brug is geen publiek domein, is ook eigenlijk geen brug te noemen. Dit is letterlijk iemands achtertuin.
Door dit soort bruggen en waterovergangen toe te voegen, lijkt het net alsof dit openbaar gebied is, met toegang tot bijv. natuurgebieden.
eggie (2024-05-27 10:00:47+00:00): Bertus..

Dat mag geen probleem zijn. Ook niet publiek domein staat gewoon in OSM
Ik zelf zal ook niet snel wegen over de erven intekenen.

Nog een voorbeeld. De woningen zijn ook geen publiek domein, maar staan gewoon in OSM.. zelfs als import vanuit de BAG (Kadaster)

Ook de wegen in de tuin van het paleis Huis Ten Bosch staan op de kaart.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/52.09312/4.34388

De kaart wordt overigens ook gebruikt door de VR (o.a. Brandweer)

Verbindingen op particulier terrein kunnen van levensbelang zijn.
mavl (2024-06-22 11:38:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 153025651, 153025658, 153025634, 153025596, 153025615, 153025678 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible sources].
eggie (2024-05-27 07:16:05+00:00): De brug heb ik teruggezet. Deze zal niet routeren, want hij maakt geen deel van een wegen netwerk.
MVG
eggie
mat (2024-05-28 05:19:25+00:00): C'est à dire ? Y'a-t-il des travaux ? Le pont va-t-il être détruit ?
eggie (2024-05-27 07:14:15+00:00): reverted by changeset #151882823

Alels was hier al met de juiste accesstags access=private getagd.
Wat is het probleem?

MVG
eggie
Mxdanger (2024-06-10 04:09:46+00:00): I was doing QA for routes https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=-117.31567&lat=34.51586&zoom=15 and saw that an issue may have been caused by you when you split Civic Drive.

Be careful when splitting road medians since this can break route relations. Don't worry about PTv1 routes as those aren't useful and are far too broken, however make sure to fix up any PTv2 routes.

Related changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152477393
user_11609320 (2024-06-11 19:34:34+00:00): ah, I didn't check for the bus routes when I split it. thanks for pointing that out.
eggie (2024-05-27 07:12:05+00:00): Deze changeset heb ik teruggedraaid en access private toegevoegd.
MVG
eggie
LorenzoPesci (2026-07-06 13:37:28+00:00): il rifugio è ancora attivo? in rete non ci sono notizie recenti, temo sia chiuso.
Dino Michelini (2026-07-06 14:37:29+00:00): So che l'operarore che lo gestiva (Rifugi dei Sibillini) ha chiuso a fine 2023 ma il bivacco è ancora presente. Quindi andrebbero aggiornati solo i tag relativi al gestore.
eggie (2024-05-27 07:08:58+00:00): warnings:crossing_ways:highway-highway
  	2

Wat is precies je bedoeling hier ?
Je tekent hier nieuwe paden over bestaande wegen.
Ik draai dit even terug.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-05-27 07:09:57+00:00): reverted due to duplicated ways by changeset #151882668
BertusvanderPavert (2024-05-27 09:39:06+00:00): Gedeelte van deze paden is enkel te voet te bereiken
eggie (2024-05-27 09:55:44+00:00): Oke... Ik zal even laten zien wat je hebt gedaan..
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=151881403

De gele lijnen die je hebt ingetekend heb je geplakt op de toegangsweg op de parkeerplaats. We noemen dat duplicated ways.
Op die toegangsweg op de parkeerplaats kun je gewoon lopen.
Daar hoeft dus geen voetpad overheen.
eggie (2024-05-27 09:56:33+00:00): Zie https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_foot&route=51.89450%2C5.09214%3B51.89425%2C5.09106
mat (2024-05-28 05:23:50+00:00): Bonjour, la place n'est plus du tout accessible aux véhicules à moteur ?
GeoBoris (2024-05-28 09:54:24+00:00): Tout est bloqué. Le place est entièrement reconstruit.

https://haguenau.fr/fr/article/la-grandrue-sud-et-la-place-de-neubourg-se-metamorphosent
Titi72 T (2024-05-28 12:03:00+00:00): Je confirme : sur la "zone" que j'ai mie en vert-kaki sur la carte (donc la "zone de travaux") elle est entourée de "grilles de chantier" de 2 m de haut, il y a jute d la place pour le piétons (ils se serrent comme des harengs pour passer !) aux pourtours de cette zone, même le vélo (en roulant, même en étant doué pour rouler à 2 km/h et en équilibre, c'et impoible, il faut mettre pied à terre. La largeur et de à peine 1 m à 1m50 au mieux.
Bref, tout ce qui et "à moteur" même une simple mobylette, en pourrait, et ne doit pas passer !
Les trottoirs tout autour c'est : « pour maintenir l'accès aux commerces ».
Si vous voulez être convaincu, tapez simplement sur Glouglou : "Travaux place de Neubourg à Haguenau"
Au-moins deux articles de presse du canard local "Les DNA" ont fait des articles avec deux photos parlantes : 

https://www.dna.fr/economie/2024/05/21/travaux-dits-neubourg-le-long-chantier-commence

ET cette portion era fa
Titi72 T (2024-05-28 12:09:43+00:00): et cette portion et POUR L'INSTANT encire accessible, mais en "sans issue" (la portion de la "Grand rue" située au sud-ouest de cette fameuse zone :
la photographe se situait "dos au grillage de chantier" (la Maison de la Presse se situant dans son dos, et elle photographiait en direction du sud/sud-ouest :
https://www.dna.fr/politique/2024/02/09/bientot-un-nouveau-visage-pour-le-sud-du-centre-ville

Et concernant l' "autre bout" (donc la rue du Maréchal Foch située à l'Est de cette zone, les "motorisés devront tout simplement emprunter la rue perpendiculaire "Rue Stiegelmann".
Titi72 T (2024-05-28 12:14:59+00:00): Autre lien vers le site officiel de la ville (en plus du lien qu'à posté GeoBoris) :
https://www.haguenau.fr/fr/infos-travaux/travaux-de-la-place-de-neubourg-et-de-la-grandrue-sud
silversurfer83 (2024-05-27 06:55:02+00:00): Hi there :)

this doens't seem to be the first edit of yours that get's reverted. You also have the "review requested" marker set, so here's my "review":
you moved a bunch of nodes further east without explanation and you always use 4-letter comments. The comment isn't helpful and the moving of nodes of highways and adresses is really bad for routing so I'd very much like you to stop and ask for help or explain what you're up to. Thank you.

silversurfer83

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151881910
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151881427
woodpeck (2024-05-27 11:31:01+00:00): Dear TVGRECCE, the addition of two ramps https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1286988244 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1286988246 is not supported by aerial imagery. I will remove them again. Please only add ramps like this if there is physical separation between the indivdiual lanes.
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-27 07:02:17+00:00): Hi bikingallday, welcome to OSM.

I guess something went wrong with your name of the following new map element, correct?

https://osm.org/way/446941126
Azharul Islam Anik (2024-05-30 08:26:39+00:00): Thanks for your contribution. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151881963
Azharul Islam Anik (2024-05-30 08:25:41+00:00): Thanks for your contribution. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151881999
gurglypipe (2024-05-27 08:58:43+00:00): Hiya, thanks for updating this. As a tip, when somewhere’s closed down it’s better to mark it as disused (using a lifecycle prefix, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix) and change name=Snooty Fox to old_name=Snooty Fox. This allows people to see that it’s closed, rather than have the map look like it never existed in the first place.

I’ve made these changes in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151887233

Thanks and happy mapping :)
Leonardo Moretti (2025-04-10 16:16:06+00:00): Ciao,
scusa il disturbo, volevo segnalarti che con la modifica in oggetto è stata eliminata una tratta (way) facente parte della relazione 179A che quindi risulta interrotta.
Da quanto so io (sulla base delle linee guida di OSM) non si deve mai eliminare una way a meno che non sia stata frutto di un mero errore di inserimento oppure si tratti di un sentiero effettivamente dismesso per sempre (esempio perchè franato).
Soprattutto se la way fa parte di una relazione come in questo caso.
Esistono altri modi (tag) per indicare che ci sono difficoltà o temporanee impossibilità nel percorrere una tratta.
Essendo OSM lo strumento con il quale il CAI mantiene il suo catasto, interrompere una relazione che rappresenta un sentiero a catasto crea vari problemi. Sarebbe meglio segnalare il problema direttamente alla sezione CAI.
Perdonami se lo fatta un po' lunga, e premesso che è già in programma un sopralluogo da parte di alcuni volontari della sezione CAI di Cesena coinvolti nella manutenzione dei sentieri, volevo chiederti se possibile qualche dettaglio in più su che tipo di problemi di accessibilità hai riscontrato: frane? spini? altro?
buldo81 (2025-04-11 06:52:13+00:00): Buongiorno, non conoscevo queste regole, e visto che mi sono trovato in difficolta più volte per sentieri inesistenti ho pensato di far bene ad eliminarlo cosicchè altri non incappassero nel mio problema. Il sentiero è franato, ho trovato la variante che è ben battuta e ho inserito quella. Se OSM permette di fare queste modifiche senza segnalazioni di regola particolari, io non posso saperlo e apporto modifiche che facilitino in futuro la consultazione e soprattutto il percorso effettivo sul campo. Detto questo, se vuoi reinserire il vecchio tracciato fai pure, con le dovute note. Saluti
Leonardo Moretti (2025-04-11 17:05:34+00:00): Capisco e apprezzo l'intento! Purtroppo lo strumento, quando si fanno modifiche, non da tutti gli avvisi e le varie linee guida stanno scritte in modo disarticolato tra wiki di OSM e manuali del CAI. Nessun problema comunque!
Volevo chiederti: la variante di cui parli è questa https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1220142302?
buldo81 (2025-04-15 10:24:51+00:00): Si la variante che ho percorso e tracciato è quella da te indicata. saluti
Leonardo Moretti (2025-04-16 10:05:15+00:00): Ok bene, grazie mille!
opendcc (2024-07-15 07:05:39+00:00): Hello,
please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name#When_not_to_use and consider reworking your edits, thank you!
hatul (2024-07-14 09:25:47+00:00): שלום יהושע
ודה על התרומות למפה.
בבקשה לא להפוך את הנקודה של הספריה לסוג אחר. אפשר ורצוי ליצור נקודה חדשה לבוסתן.
Sajeevini sivajothy (2024-05-29 06:29:06+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is not in-between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found. #Osmcha#OMGuru

Here "Shop" is not a name; it is a type of amenity. Please try to find out the name and other details of the building using Mapillary street-level imagery. This mapping challenge is to collect the POI.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151883847
mueschel (2024-05-28 11:40:45+00:00): Hallo,
du hast hier viele neue, nummerierte Tags wie mapillary:8 erfunden. Das ist nicht nötig. Mehrere Mapillary-Bilder können (und sollten) in einem einzelnen "mapillary" Tag erfasst werden, getrennt mit Semikola.
Kimberley H Bagley (2024-05-28 12:03:54+00:00): Das habe ich nicht erfunden, dass ist, warum auch immer, so wie es MapComplete macht 🤷‍♀️
Kimberley H Bagley (2024-05-28 12:07:31+00:00): Und wenn ich's über iD gemacht hätte, dann hätte ich es wahrscheinlich mit Semikolon getrennt
Sajeevini sivajothy (2024-05-29 06:22:03+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is not in-between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found. #Osmcha#OMGuru
Here "Shop" is not a name; it is a type of amenity. Please try to find out the name and other details of the building using Mapillary street-level imagery. This mapping challenge is to collect the POI.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151883879
Sajeevini sivajothy (2024-05-29 06:15:23+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is not in-between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found. #Osmcha#OMGuru

Here "Company" is not a name; it is a type of amenity. Please try to find out the name and other details of the building using Mapillary street-level imagery. This mapping challenge is to collect the POI.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151883926
Sajeevini sivajothy (2024-05-29 06:09:26+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is not in-between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found. #Osmcha#OMGuru

Here "Shop" is not a name; it is a type of amenity. Please try to find out the name and other details of the building using Mapillary street-level imagery. This mapping challenge is to collect the POI.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151884001
NorthCrab_upload (2024-05-27 11:35:34+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.

"Jana Kazimierza":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/833876906
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/833877603
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/833877909

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Gregory Peony (2024-05-28 00:39:37+00:00): You created intersecting highways which do not share common nodes. Navigational software may/will not recognise the junction and so will not route correctly or in the most efficient way. The highways should be better alligned to imagery.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151885450
silversurfer83 (2024-05-27 08:40:33+00:00): Gude kay_D :)

hoffe, es hat dir im Nationalparkzentrum gefallen. Schönes Eckchen da, finde ich.

Warum entfernst du denn die beiden payment tags? Sind sie falsch?

cheers
silversurfer83
frasty (2024-05-29 21:14:45+00:00): Ciao,
ho visto che hai allineato le strade a Bing. Purtroppo Bing in questa zona è allineato in modo sbagliato. Ho così ripristinato l'allinemanto delle strade e degli edifici a quello fornito dalla regione Toscana.
In generale Bing non è molto affidabile per essere usato come sfondo per ricalcare in quanto è spesso disallineato. Se usi ID consiglio ESRI word imagery.
Gregory Peony (2024-05-27 23:46:25+00:00): You should not add highways (open ways) that share multiple consecutive nodes as this creates a ovelapping ways error.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151885725
Gregory Peony (2024-05-28 00:43:46+00:00): You created highway/highway overlaps without common nodes. Please write a changeset comment (ideally before the hashtags).
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151885821
eggie (2024-05-27 10:14:15+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback 
Hier is iets niet helemaal goed  gegaan. Je hebt een wandelpad getrekend om de buurt bovenop een ander pad. Waarom?
De Homerusbuurt staat gewoon al op de kaart in de vorm van een place node.
Ik draai deze wijziging weer even terug.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-05-27 10:17:24+00:00): reverted by changeset #151890518

Dit was je wijziging https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=151886521

Je geeft een buurt aan dmv een voetpadomtrek.
De buurt staat al goed aangegeven.
MVG
eggie
Gregory Peony (2024-05-28 00:51:49+00:00): The nothern way you added created a highway/highway overlap. Please add ways accurately. Please write a changeset comment stating what you did before the hashtags
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151886526
Gregory Peony (2024-05-28 00:54:03+00:00): Highway junctions must share a common node. Please, write a changeset comment before the hashtags.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151886662
NorthCrab_upload (2024-05-27 11:35:33+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.

"Szybowa":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/833518727
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/833519039
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/833788708
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/833789564
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/833789566
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/833789770
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/833809882

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Gregory Peony (2024-05-28 00:57:20+00:00): Please, write a changeset comment before the hashtags. Intersecting highways must share a common node unless they are on seperate layers i.e. physically seperated, one above the other.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151886895
AndyB_66 (2025-09-24 19:16:33+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
ToniE (2024-05-27 09:43:06+00:00): Servus ludwich,

ich haben bei ähnlichen Ausrichtungen auch schon mal

roof:orientation=across

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape genutzt

Gruß
Toni
kapazao (2024-05-27 13:59:14+00:00): Hola, esto se debe indicar como fuente "source" (la web en todo caso sería https://siu.ctagr.es) y se debería indicar en la relación de la ruta de autobús, no en la parada.
Un saludo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151887096
MyoKyawKyaw (2024-05-29 09:14:02+00:00): Thanks for your contribution in these building mapping. The mapping looks nice and clear understanding of changeset comments. Keep Contributing, Cheers!!!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151887235
Gregory Peony (2024-05-27 17:03:53+00:00): You moved a node to a less accurate location so I reverted your change set. It looks like a mouse slip. Please keep your edits within a task area and leave a changeset comment at the begining of your changeset.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151887341
eggie (2024-05-27 10:20:31+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Tip  Gebouwen zijn import vanuit het kadaster. Beter deze niet verwijderen en dan opnieuw intekenen.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-05-27 10:42:16+00:00): Wanneer het een priveparking is dan access=private en/of misschien customers?
Een hek kan nooit op een kruispunt van wegen staan. De node op de parking heb ik verwijderd. Je hebt toch een vlak ingetekend.
De wegen op de parking kunnen ook access=private meekrijgen.
gr eggie
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-30 15:21:50+00:00): op=08:00-12:00, 13:00-17:00

was it supposed to be opening_hours ?
chnuessli (2024-05-30 15:25:11+00:00): yes it was supposed to be that. I am sorry for the issue. I corrected that immediately in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152041401
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-30 18:08:23+00:00): thanks for a fix!
eggie (2024-05-27 10:40:17+00:00): Dit is ook zo'n addertje.
Eenduidig mappen. Of een vlak of een node.
De node met parking  heb ik nu verwijderd
gr eggie
silversurfer83 (2024-05-27 10:37:53+00:00): Gude :)

ein zwei Anmerkungen/Fragen zu dieser Änderung:

- bist du dir sicher, dass der Sportplatz an der Eder vollständig mit dieser Art Barriere https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dcable_barrier eingezäunt ist? Ich kenne die Situation vor Ort nicht, bezweifle jedoch die Lückenlosigkeit des "Zauns". Meine Bitte: Barrieren immer möglichst nah an der Realität einzeichnen. Wo Lücken sind, sind diese auch zu lassen und ggf. durch passende Tore und Gatter zu markieren.

- du hast an einem Feldweg ein sehr allgemeines "destiantion" als Zugangsberechtigung gesetzt. Mich würde jetzt mal die Beschilderung dieses Weges interessieren, da diese die Zugangsberechtigungen maßgeblich mitbestimmt.

Bei Fragen immer raus damit
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151887874
s1mCycle5 (2024-05-27 12:23:34+00:00): Hi,
das mit der Barriere muss ein Versehen gewesen sein, das nehme ich wieder raus, sorry.

Zu dem Feldweg, da steht meines Wissens ein "Durchfahrt für Fahrzeuge aller Art veboten"-Schild mit Anlieger frei und Fahrrad frei. Dann wäre vehicle= destination und bicycle=yes besser, oder?
silversurfer83 (2024-05-27 12:33:59+00:00): Danke für die schnelle Reaktion :)

Zur Barriere: Kein Problem, passiert.

Feldweg: wenn du das VZ250 meinst, dann ist dein Korrekturvorschlag richtig, ja.

Es gibt auch ein nettes Werkzeug, welches uns hilft die deutschen VZ in passende tags in OSM zu übersetzen:
https://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/

Verkehrszeichen auswählen, vorgeschlagene tags begutachten und auf die betroffenen Straßen übertragen.

Happy mapping und immer gute Fahrt
Silversurfer83
Frans S (2024-05-28 08:31:18+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please do not tag traces leading to farms/buildings etc as track . Please consult the Highway wiki.
Residential / service is a better choice.
Best regards
Frans S (2024-05-28 10:09:45+00:00): fyi
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway
BR_pebble (2024-07-02 14:29:56+00:00): Hello DipaleeShirsath@123
Thank you for mapping!
I have added missing buildings -37.8328624, 144.9572215;
-37.8329037, 144.9571887
-37.8330219, 144.9570395;
-37.8330907, 144.9567206;
-37.8331087, 144.9566703;
-37.833117, 144.956672;
-37.8330934, 144.956783;
-37.8332442, 144.9565664
-37.8336288, 144.9565476;
-37.8336394, 144.9563102;
Please inspect your task carefully before closing.
Happy Mapping!
nevw (2024-07-03 04:33:27+00:00): Who is checking the quality of these mappers?
Three buildings in a row have incorrect angular indents at the front.
BR_pebble (2024-07-04 11:48:22+00:00): Hi nevw, thank you for the feedback. 
I have already provided feedback to this user earlier and on behalf of him/her. I have made the corrections on the angular indents at the given location. FYI, i am performing quality check for this user.
nevw (2024-07-04 11:55:50+00:00): Thanks for the positive action and feedback.
Cheers.
silversurfer83 (2024-05-27 10:47:30+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151892023
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151888856
BR_pebble (2024-07-18 12:19:02+00:00): Hello rakshe00
Thank you for mapping!
I have added missing buildings 19.8749624, 75.3417486;
19.875115, 75.3418165;
19.8752719, 75.3419871;
19.8751925, 75.3420856;
19.8757468, 75.3424922;
19.8753562, 75.3428374;
19.8752125, 75.343107;
19.8749833, 75.3429525;
19.8749181, 75.3430527;
19.8749434, 75.34292;
Please inspect your task carefully before closing.
Happy Mapping!