piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
dpolovinkin (2025-03-07 02:53:28+00:00): аа, понял, оки доки!) просто очень редко такое встречаю, 99% подобных зон area'ми делаются

про виллы, хм.. мне кажется я бы их residential делал, все таки это же частные дома, а не отели какие то) мне кажется не супер будет подходить по описанию https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse=commercial
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-07-23 10:57:07+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1245945551/history has addr:housename = 400 that was added in this edit
What this tag means? Numeric value is unexpected here - was it supposed to be addr:housenumber= ?
literan (2024-07-07 11:16:44+00:00): Вы опять продолжаете ставить адреску в кривом формате. Зачем вы это делаете?
Baloo Uriza (2024-11-07 17:35:13+00:00): Seems unlikely given that this is a mountain bike park and highway=footway also means bicycle=no.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153646430
pitscheplatsch (2024-07-07 06:56:27+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153648629
CoyKoi (2024-07-08 03:02:34+00:00): Hi you dragged node 11726186943 with this edit
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153646719
Supaplex (2024-07-07 07:56:23+00:00): Hi

The OpenStreetMap project is a collaborative project and reflects the de facto reality. 
There is a guideline of disputed territories:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Disputed_territories

I don't hear any news of the change of control of these territories. Don't make edits that are not real. 

Dennis Raylin Chen
Data Working Group
data@osmfoundation.org

Xin chào

Dự án OpenStreetMap là một dự án hợp tác và phản ánh thực tế.
Có một hướng dẫn về các vùng lãnh thổ tranh chấp:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Disputed_territories

Tôi không nghe thấy bất kỳ tin tức nào về việc thay đổi quyền kiểm soát các vùng lãnh thổ này. Đừng chỉnh sửa những thông tin không có thật.

Dennis Raylin Chen
Nhóm làm việc về dữ liệu
data@osmfoundation.org

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153649955
jackripper1 (2024-08-27 00:05:34+00:00): Hola. Eliminaste un cruce nuevo en Diego Portales frente a la plaza y restauraste uno anterior que ya no existe. Por favor más rigurosidad. Gracias.
adiatmad (2024-07-23 13:43:37+00:00): Hi Sanjay41! Hope you are doing well. Considering adding the village's name? If you are, I'd suggest looking at this tag and removing any others.

>(https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1299671563)
>(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dadministrative)
evo_evz (2026-06-14 13:16:34+00:00): Hey you tagged this crossing as a bridge but it's not a bridge. What does mpr.lt/c/48601/t/234951934 mean? It also looks like it goes under the Kingsway but it's the same level as the Kingsway. You're just crossing the road. Let me know your thoughts. Thanks
CaptainCarte (2026-06-22 14:12:31+00:00): I tagged it as a bridge because it looks (from imagery and Kingsway being a bridge) like its on a bridge.

From the wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bridge : The bridge should either end before the junction (the normal situation) or in cases where the junction is actually 'in mid air' itself then the other ways joining the junction should also be made into bridges for the relevant sections.

The link is the short form to this maproulette challenge task: https://maproulette.org/challenge/48601/task/234951934 The challenge was in this case bridge misconnections.
I hope this claryfies it.
TheSwavu (2026-06-22 23:10:16+00:00): It's kinda complicated. Based on this https://previews.me.com.au/ingestion/917/image/large/000/000/000/000/000000000000081/237448xl.jpg the "bridge" is much tighter than is currently mapped.

This post on Facebook has a view from 1958 https://www.facebook.com/Igrewupinmortdale2223/posts/onthisday-28-october-1958-photograph-taken-from-denman-avenue-overlooking-the-st/355481430202094/ and it kinda looks like they might be more tunnels than a bridge.
evo_evz (2026-06-23 13:54:11+00:00): Ok thanks. I've removed the bridge tag from the crossing because with it, it would seem like you have to cross a bridge to cross the road and that is not the case. The road you cross is the bridge over the railway tracks. Pedestrians don't cross over the road on a bridge they walk on the road to cross it.
ika-chan! (2024-07-07 17:17:04+00:00): There is no dual carriageway under the rail freight depot. Why do you keep adding fictional road layouts?
tux67 (2024-07-08 06:15:10+00:00): Hi, the official name was intententionally in lower Case Letters and follows the discussion https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/namensfrage-borussia-park/115505/3 "Und bitte keine Versalien." Where the recommendation is based on the Wiki Guidelines for Names:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Proper_name_spelling

BR
tux67
stadiaarcadia (2024-07-08 13:02:36+00:00): Ah I see, thank you.
bkil (2024-07-07 11:04:40+00:00): Are you sure this on is man_made=water_well? Most blue ones with a manual handle are "taps" supplied by the main water pipes. See here: https://wiki.osm.org/Hungary/Jel%C3%B6l%C3%A9si_p%C3%A9ld%C3%A1k#Szabadid%C5%91
dueyduey (2024-07-07 12:02:30+00:00): No, you are probably right. (I chose what seemed the closest approximation from the StreetComplete menu.)
bkil (2024-07-07 12:30:10+00:00): Are you using the English version? Do you think the phrasing of the quest could be improved? Did in not show a proper picture for each kind as a guide?
dueyduey (2024-07-07 13:03:52+00:00): Yes, the English version. I don't remember the phrasing, but I definitely looked at 'tap' and decided against it based on the description and the pictures. Note that I did not know that the "classic blue ones" work from the main supply pipes, I actually (wrongly) believed to know otherwise. water_well sample in picture being blue didn't help either :-)
sanchi (2024-09-22 07:06:59+00:00): Hola.
Estoy corriendo algunos pequeños errores y me encontrado en este conjunto de cambios y otros semejants tuyos algunos valores numéricos incorrectos. Los decimales hay que separarlos por punto no por coma. Ya los he corregido los que he visto
Un saludo.
Polarbear (2024-08-28 21:19:26+00:00): Customers can park here, so private is wrong. 
Changed to access=customers
4004 (2024-07-07 23:27:42+00:00): здравствуйте, спасибо за правку. 
название - это только имя собственное. номер дома вы уже внесли
Lordmcfuzz (2024-07-10 15:29:26+00:00): I was on that ride!
flohoff (2024-07-07 09:55:14+00:00): Moin,
oneway=-1 ist legitim das weisst du? Da hat jemand einen weg der ursprünglich oneway=yes hat umgedreht - dann machen die editoren da ein oneway=-1 draus.

Also hast du dir das angesehen das es da keine Einbahnstraßenregelung gibt?

Flo
flohoff (2024-07-07 09:56:20+00:00): Ah - ich sehe gerade erst das das ja eine "Sackgasse" ist - okay - dann macht das keinen sinn.
JuanCarlos80 (2024-07-07 16:57:45+00:00): Ich war noch einmal da. Die Einbahnstraßenregelung des Lenstruper Wegs wird an der Kreuzung Strangweg/Schönemarker Weg nicht wiederholt in Richtung Norden. Die Umleitung Richtung Detmold erfolgt per Einbahnstraßenregelung auf dem Schönemarker Weg
Carto'Cité (2024-09-15 13:29:25+00:00): Bonjour 2FL,

Merci pour cette belle contribution et la précision du panneau voie verte.

J'ajoute le traffic_sign=FR:C115 sur la voie elle-même car c'est une pratique courante pour identifer la signalétique utilisée sur les aménagements. Cela permet éventuellement de distinguer les voies vertes « vraies » avec signalétique des voies verte déduites avec les tags bicycle=designated + foot=designated + highway=path que tu as bien utilisés.

Merci encore et n'hésite pas si tu as la moindre question ou remarque.

Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
Andrea Musuruane (2024-07-07 13:47:37+00:00): Ciao. Ora la relazione per il percorso 858 non ha più il tag cai_scale. Immagino sia un errore. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153651201
marcogino (2024-07-07 14:17:35+00:00): aggiunto tag cai_scale a relazione 7722447, 
grazie, ciao gino
VA00 (2025-01-29 15:33:30+00:00): Jaki jest cel usunięcia tagu smoothness?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-23 15:49:26+00:00): Zgaduję że o https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/173535873/history chodzi

z tego co pamiętam to

- celu nie miało, chyba SC samo usuwa jak się zmieni wartość surface
- ponadto w tym przypadku wartość ta błędna była

Ponadto grade1 też jest błędne z tego co pamiętam więc skasuje to
VA00 (2025-03-23 16:43:02+00:00): Tylko że tam był asfalt, zniszczony w stopniu tak dużym, że ktoś nie znający tej drogi od lat mógł pomyśleć, że go tam w ogóle nie czy nigdy nie było. Stąd grade1. Gravel był używany do doraźnego zasypywania dziur w asfalcie, aż w końcu stał się dominującą nawierzchnią.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-23 18:26:19+00:00): ale to że asfalt był kiedyś to nie oznacza że jest to grade1 do skończenia świata
ma-rt-in (2024-07-15 18:34:45+00:00): Hallo,

werher stammt die Info, das hier Kühne+Nagel ist? Auf deren Website findet man dazu nix.

vg Martin
michel2001 (2024-07-15 18:55:20+00:00): Hi,
Ich weiß es aus erster Hand weil ich dort beschäftigt bin :). Auf der Website ist der Standort leider tatsächlich nicht aufgeführt… Das einzige was es Online dazu gibt ist wenn man sich mit Störfallbetrieben befasst https://www.ihk.de/hamburg/produktmarken/beratung-service/innovation/umweltberatung/stoerfallbetriebe-hamburg/betriebe-a-z/kuehne-nagel-logistik-3698210?shortUrl=%2Fsfbkuehne

Sonst kann man das auch sehr gut vor Ort erkennen. Es steht groß das Kühne + Nagel Logo da und es ist auch auf dem Gelände als Kühne + Nagel ausgeschildert.

Viele Grüße,
Michel
ma-rt-in (2024-07-15 18:58:04+00:00): Hallo Michael,

diese Info am besten das nächste Mal mit in den Changeset-Kommentar und/oder Quelle aufnehmen. Dann weiß jeder Bescheid :)

vg
ma-rt-in (2024-07-15 18:58:17+00:00): Danke für die Ausführung
michel2001 (2024-07-15 18:59:30+00:00): Okay wird gemacht. Vielen dank!
Aleksander Hugo (2024-09-27 11:17:28+00:00): Na jakiej podstawie została nadana nazwa "Szwaczek"? Wg mnie była to jedynie robocza nazwa ulicy, ale nie została nigdy nadana oficjalnie.
Krystek (2024-07-07 13:55:10+00:00): Zgodne jest to z zasadami OSM na Wiki, co już wypunktował @Barroszt ale trochę bez sensu, bo Uchwała nr V/16/74 Rady Miasta z Białegostoku z 1974 roku mówi jedynie o nadaniu ulicom nazwy Zagłoba, Kmicica, Juranda...
Michoo (2024-07-13 09:25:21+00:00): Hej,
No tak, ale należy też trzeba kierować się zasadą mapowania w terenie "tak jak jest". Na znakach jest po prostu ul. Zagłoby. 

Generalnie, mamy od tego ten tag "official", aby oznaczać tak jaka jest "oficjalna" nazwa nadana, w tym przypadku, przez Radę Miasta(wówczas MRN).
d_berger (2024-07-08 11:49:37+00:00): Bitte beachte, dass baulich nicht abgetrennte Radstreifen nicht als eigenständiges highway-Element gemappt werden, sondern mittels lane tagging (z.B. cycleway=lane) auf dem entsprechenden Strassenelement, wie es bereits korrekt erfasst war. Ich habe die duplizierten Eigenschaften daher wieder entfernt.

Danke für die Korrektur des Kreisverkehrs.
pfuerst (2024-07-08 16:26:30+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. In dem Fall muss ich die anderen Fahrradwege auch wieder entfernen.
pfuerst (2024-07-08 16:29:08+00:00): Du hast alles wieder repariert. Dankeschön
bemapper (2024-07-07 13:33:47+00:00): Would you please not destroy surveyed information that is lost with a few of your edits, like this ChangeSet?

It's my interest to make my familiar areas correct, and useful, and not just in a 2D view, in line with openstreetmap.org - "OpenStreetMap is a place for mapping things that are both real and current"

At the precision sometimes required for 3D mapping, UrbIS is often outdated, slightly incorrect, if not wrong, about building outlines, and insisting different data cannot be recorded for building outlines stops correct details from being added. 

I would like to keep OpenStreetmap *correct*, represent the world, not being a copy of a different (even if freely usable) database.

In this case, the shapes took a long time to survey, and unfortunately could also take a few more attempts to make it display correctly with quirks in f4map or streets.gl.

This particular outline should not have been diverged from UrbIS in a confusing - or even noticeable - way in this occasion, to keep any relation to the database obvious; it's actually getting closer to the real world outline, why are you considering that approach wrong?
bxl-forever (2024-07-07 15:38:39+00:00): This changeset only cared to realign the polygon. This is routine maintenance work, as people using the online iD editor are often unaware of this when drawing.  No information was lost: 5 nodes were touched, with a move of respectively 3, 7, 25, 28, and 28 cm.
OSM mappers are fully aware that UrbIS geometries are sometimes wrong or outdated, and that is why these cases can be documented on the object themselves, if necessary.  That would prevent misunderstandings like here.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-07-07 09:40:28+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1778514281

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Pescan (2024-07-08 05:36:52+00:00): Dziękuję za zwrócenie uwagi. Adresy widnieją na paragonie, i na stronie internetowej stacji. Skasować, czy zostawić?

Pozdrawiam!
NorthCrab (2024-07-09 16:58:35+00:00): W tym przypadku Działowo to nie nazwa ulicy tylko pobliskiej wsi, ustawiłem adres na addr:place=Działowo i usunąłem addr:city oraz addr:street :-) Pozdrawiam!
Pescan (2024-07-10 10:03:23+00:00): Dziękuję uprzejmie.
aighes (2024-07-16 23:15:19+00:00): Hey, I noticed you changed several tags ramps. As far as I know you can use the ramp until the toll booth with e-bikes, bicycles etc. So they should not be considered as motorway_link. Only after the toll booth, the motorway restrictions apply. Could you please double check on this and adjust your edits?
LockOnGuy (2024-07-07 22:06:37+00:00): Thank you so much for catching this and adding the tag! I really appreciate it! keep up the great work!
little_maper (2024-07-08 05:57:46+00:00): Thank you LockOnGuy, I appreciate it, and thank you for improving the data in Iraq.
mga_geo (2024-07-24 06:10:10+00:00): Bonjour,
Sur les les relations route=bus, il faut ajouter les arrêts dans le bon ordre et préciser le rôle (platform/...).
Pouvez-vous corriger ?
Merci d'avance
Marc
Filip009 (2024-07-08 12:54:06+00:00): Zdravím, daná budova ale nemá v registri adries žiadnu pridelenú adresu. Podľa katastra sa na pozemku nachádza budova so súpisným číslom 663. Odkiaľ ste teda prišiel na číslo 18?
aceman444 (2024-08-09 23:34:18+00:00): Thanks!
pyrog (2024-07-21 11:08:49+00:00): Bonjour,

Bonjour Jean-Ray,

Les commentaires "20240707-1 (année/mois/jour/n° d'ordre) " sont assez inhabituels dans OSM.

Ils correspondent à quoi ?

Cordialement,
Yves
claudiopereira (2024-07-08 03:44:29+00:00): Bom dia,
Fiz edições que por acaso coincidiram com as suas (ie. tocamos nas mesmas coisas por mero acaso). Tentei resolver as colisões a favor das suas alterações mas não é impossível que tenha apagado alguma coisa.

Peço desculpa em avanço caso tal tenha acontecido.

Boas edições,
Cláudio
PJFonseca (2024-07-08 04:35:15+00:00): Ora essa Cláudio, se foram apagadas, é uma questão de voltar a fazer.

Boas edições.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-07-20 09:56:20+00:00): why were all roads set oneway=no?
Tatfahren (2024-09-18 19:58:02+00:00): Hallo chrznr,
du hast hier als Quelle unter anderem "streetlevel imagery" angegeben (Straßenfotos). 

Im von dir verwendeten iD-Editor wird dann automatisch bei imagery_used die verwendete Quelle abgespeichert, sofern diese im Editor ausgewählt wurde. Dort ist aber nur ein Luftbild angegeben.

Kannst du vielleicht benennen, welche Quelle du genau genutzt hast (z.B. mapillary, kartaview oder Google Street View)?

"streetlevel imagery" könnte alles mögliche sein, wobei OSM meist eine Freigabe benötigt, da es sonst Probleme mit der Lizenz geben kann.

Danke für eine Antwort (sofern du dich noch dran erinnerst).
dvdhoven (2024-07-07 13:40:05+00:00): Je hebt op meerdere delen van het Hoge Vlakpad foot=no gezet. Dat klopt niet fietspaden zijn in NL toegankelijk voor voetgangers. Ik heb die foot=no verwijderd.
Het kan ook zijn dat StreetComplete dat gedaan heeft, die is inmiddels berucht om dit soort foute aanpassingen.
BroemBroem (2024-07-07 14:03:20+00:00): Top, ik heb StreetComplete gebruikt en vergeten te checken hoe dat in OSM komt te staan.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-07-07 11:00:29+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9413856696
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1020670879

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eggie (2026-03-29 18:58:06+00:00): Martin,

Wellicht even met deze tool kijken..
https://qgiscloud.com/PeeWee32/OSM_Route_issues/?l=Info%2CCycle_route_no_cycling!%2CWaymarked%20trails%20cycling!%2CHiking_route_no_hiking%2CWaymarked%20trails%20hiking%2CHiking_route_no_cycling!%2CWaymarked%20trails%20hiking2!%2COpenStreetMap2%2COpenStreetMap&t=OSM_Route_issues&e=494090%2C6724045%2C502218%2C6727781

foot=use_sidepath is wel correct, maar als er routes overlopen gaat het verkeerd.
Groet,
eggie
BCNorwich (2024-07-15 07:14:06+00:00): Please be aware of the highway warnings above, the problems can disrupt routing.

Regards Bernard.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-07-07 11:30:19+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Ligota Wielka":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1049549709
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1151948988
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1299781309
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1299781310
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1299781311
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1299781312
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1299781313
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1299781314
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1299781315
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1299781316

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
pitscheplatsch (2024-07-07 11:37:20+00:00): Hi LScarb, welcome to OSM.

Please do not add temporary data to the main OSM database.

Please, could you revert your edits?

Thanks!
LScarb (2024-07-08 06:43:20+00:00): Hi Pitscheplatsch,
Thanks for the hint. probably mentioned in the mapping doc as well.
I have removed all temporary data. Is there any chance to edit data in the browser and export that data as GEOjson to my local machine without uploading to the general data base?
Thanks again!
pitscheplatsch (2024-07-08 06:48:21+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/153664087

Thanks, LScarb.
pitscheplatsch (2024-07-08 06:48:56+00:00): Regarding your question: I think this should be possible with QGIS.
pitscheplatsch (2024-07-08 06:50:06+00:00): Or, of course, you could use JOSM. I would make this dependent on what exactly you have in mind.
LScarb (2024-07-08 07:00:43+00:00): I took a look at JOSM yesterday, but the quick and easy interface in the browser just makes small scale projects on agricultural fields much smoother. Wanted to get around 3.5 Gb QGis but I can uninstall it if I'm finished. Thanks again, nice to have such quick and meaningful feedback from the community.
mueschel (2024-07-08 08:21:16+00:00): Hi,
please check the nodes you added. There are two like this one without any valid tag:
12039826176
VLD549 (2024-07-26 14:21:30+00:00): Hi, is there a reason to capitalize everything? Do we need to?
Shouldn't it be Roes/Van Tijen Assurantiekantoor?

Thank you in advance!
Dillen GJ (2024-07-27 17:20:22+00:00): I was there 20 days ago.
The name is written like that.

But there are,so far I know, no rule’s on that.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-07-07 12:10:15+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/276213036

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
rab (2024-07-07 19:45:08+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1299785859/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/637163951/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1299786581/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1299785033/history

also, 

please do not connect areas to line features like road or railways

descriptives names

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions
André W (2024-07-07 12:03:56+00:00): Gemeint war: in Selm div. Aktualisierungen...(nicht Lünen)
Wise_Turtle (2024-10-14 20:45:52+00:00): Там здание ровное (4 точки). Вы обрисовали двухскатную крышу при виде сбоку.
Tatiana24 (2024-10-15 06:00:44+00:00): доброе утро. поняла, моя ошибка, спасибо.
mavl (2024-07-07 14:34:38+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок добавляет здание, у которого нет ни одного прямого угла (угла равного 90 градусам). На спутниковом снимке Esri в этом месте небольшой частный дом с четырьми стенами и четырьмя углами в 90 градусов. Добавленное этим пакетом правок здание имеет семь углов.    
Пожалуйста, найдите время, чтобы подумать о добавлении в OpenStreetMap правильных данных, которые не придётся исправлять другим людям.
GeoAndi (2024-07-07 21:12:52+00:00): Heißt die komplette Verbindungsstraße mit alternativem Namen wirklich "alte B8" oder meintest du stattdessen https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:old_ref wie es z.B. hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25962303#map=15/49.1864/11.4469 eingetragen ist?
HAmap (2024-07-08 19:16:50+00:00): Die Bezeichnung "alte B8" hab ich aus einem Zeitungsartikel, aber deinen Vorschlag finde ich trotzdem besser - kannte ich noch nicht, wird eingebaut, besten Dank!
GeoAndi (2024-07-08 19:29:13+00:00): Gut, vielleicht könnte man "old_ref=B8" auch noch für die ganze Ortsdurchfahrt Pölling eintragen, da die B8 ja früher durch den ganzen Ort verlaufen ist (vor der Umgehung) und nicht nur bis zum Kreisverkehr :-) ? Kann ich auch gerne selber machen :-)
HAmap (2024-07-09 09:27:31+00:00): Schon erledigt (jetzt bis zum östlichen Ortsschild, der Anschluss an den Kreisverkehr ist ja auch neu) - hab dabei gleich noch zwei falsch gesetzte alt_name-tags entfernt. Ich bügel meinen Quatsch gerne selbst aus ;-)
GeoAndi (2024-07-09 11:14:18+00:00): perfekt 👍, genau so hab ich mir das vorgestellt :-)
fjavier_gr (2025-01-14 20:24:38+00:00): Hola,

Creo que la carretera nacional no ha cambiado su trazado.

Un saludo.
mcliquid (2024-07-08 06:09:50+00:00): I've deleted this node without any tags: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12039893443/history
NeisBot (2024-07-07 13:12:57+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits, particularly those concerning the names you've added or modified.

It seems that some of these names are a bit unusual.

#NameCheck
DetectiveConan (2024-07-07 14:46:41+00:00): I wonder if your bot could recognize myanmar alphabet
pitscheplatsch (2024-07-07 15:40:51+00:00): It seems so ...
NorthCrab_upload (2024-07-07 13:30:20+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1020670342

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
user_1566574 (2024-10-13 11:58:26+00:00): Début de la guerre d'édition, je vous laisse accorder vos violons. ;)
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/397847503
(https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/397847503/history)

(l'autre cartographe a également été informé)