piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2024-05-29 01:39:25+00:00): Hi chicoaldeota, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/node/11940930756

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
NeisBot (2024-05-29 05:28:03+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151971254
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-29 05:29:34+00:00): Please don't add fictional map elements. Thank you!
NeisBot (2024-05-29 01:39:25+00:00): Hi chicoaldeota, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/node/11940915104

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
NeisBot (2024-05-29 05:28:14+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151971259
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-29 05:29:38+00:00): Please don't add fictional map elements. Thank you!
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-29 05:28:31+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151971265
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-29 05:29:41+00:00): Please don't add fictional map elements. Thank you!
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-29 05:28:41+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151971271
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-29 05:29:46+00:00): Please don't add fictional map elements. Thank you!
Kovoschiz (2024-05-29 05:34:48+00:00): Please don't connect left-turn slip lanes to the same point of the main lanes. This distorts the left turn.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-10-08 10:28:05+00:00): hej, to wikidata i wikipedia jest o stacji kolejowe, nie o budynku stacji kolejowej

poprawiłem w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157619491
grzegorz75jan (2024-10-08 12:26:05+00:00): Nawet nie pamiętam tej edycji. Zerknę w nocy po pracy ale zdaje się że robiłem to przez jakieś narzędzie pochodne od Wikipedii prawdopodobnie https://map.osm.wikidata.link/item/Q30201529 ale tego dowiem się w domu.
grzegorz75jan (2024-10-08 17:11:37+00:00): W domu lepiej widać. Faktycznie szczeliłem babola. Robiłem to tą podlinkowaną stroną bo opis zmiany to +wikidata.
Podziękował za wyłapanie błędu i poprawę. Ciekawe czy nie zapomnę sprawdzić kiedy ta zmiana pojawi się w zasobach Wiki.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-10-08 18:13:04+00:00): I by nie było - lepiej od razu idealnie ale to było prawie dobrze a bez tego obiekt by dalej tagu wikipedia nie miał :)

Więc zachęcam do dalszych edycji tym narzędziem
𪚥𪚥𪚥 (2024-05-29 04:04:07+00:00): 店家已經拆掉了幹嘛留著
Supaplex (2024-05-29 04:51:30+00:00): 採用 life cycle 標示，之後有新店家可以同個點
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151968260
Frans S (2024-05-29 10:24:35+00:00): Hello. Back again.
You seem an experienced mapper to me. 
Despite that, you regularly act like a beginner mapper.
Wrong tagging of highways,
You often don't connect highways to each other.
Please improve your mapping skills.
Best regards
amodak04 (2024-05-29 02:33:22+00:00): Added 5 buildings
Pontius (2024-05-29 15:58:47+00:00): Has the town/city added signage or road markings to these streets that indicate shared lanes?
desertivy (2024-05-29 11:30:10+00:00): HI Himké
both of these links are still open, I went through them yesterday, they are under construction though but it's a minor construction, so I'd suggest marking them as construction=minor, access=yes
regards
Bendita Moreira (2024-05-31 12:36:43+00:00): Hello Bendita acording to my observation you should cleap up issues of building clearly and base to standard of mapping before you upload it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151968846
Himké (2024-05-29 02:59:15+00:00): also corrected layer values
Frans S (2024-05-29 09:34:30+00:00): Hello again. 
Please check the tagging of highways.
Traces only leading to farmland etc. are no service roads. Use Track instead.
Best regards
Frans S (2024-05-29 09:59:39+00:00): Hi, Another issue.
You tagged a trace of appr. 5 mtr wide as a path. In farmland use Track instead. Paths are max 2 mtr wide.
Best regards
A67-A67 (2025-07-25 18:39:08+00:00): This change add the tag building=yes to an object that isn't a building. I've therefore reverted this change.
Xvtn (2024-05-29 19:35:36+00:00): Wait, Sweeto Burrito is back? In the same location even?
Sytys (2024-05-29 20:53:45+00:00): I saw a big Now Open sign outside on the grass
Xvtn (2024-05-29 23:40:23+00:00): Oh, wow, alright!
Patchanka (2024-05-31 16:16:35+00:00): bonjour
merci pour l'ajout de l'école. Les deux autres bâtiments dont vous parlez, c'est ceux là ?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/174650620

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/174649715

Pour une école on peut la positionner soit par un point, soit par une emprise de tout le terrain incluant les bâtiments, la cour, etc.
Frans S (2024-05-29 09:38:11+00:00): Hello again.
A trace only leading to a single building is not a 'residential'highway. Use 'service' tag instead.
Please refresh your knowledge about tagging of these highways.
Best regards
MxxCon (2024-05-31 04:04:40+00:00): Looking at the bing street imagery, i'm not sure this address exist at all. building just to the north is 49-12 and building to the south is 69-37 50 AVE
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151969075
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-29 05:15:44+00:00): #Vandalism
Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151970980
BubbaJuice (2024-05-29 03:24:53+00:00): Sorry for big bbox didn't know I went so far south.
Kovirii (2026-05-13 18:26:32+00:00): How are the voltages determined or sourced?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151969227
BubbaJuice (2026-05-14 01:59:47+00:00): 1. Probably sourced from the linked pdf, however it appears to be a dead link now so I cannot verify that.
2. Put simply, if a transmission grid is fully mapped, you can see where the lines connect and interact. Lines that connect have the same voltage. Therefore, from existing power lines or power lines from known sources, these spur or connected lines can be determined.

If you look on OpenInfraMap (https://openinframap.org/#12.34/35.07433/-106.60227) you can see the physical separation between voltages and it is clear where the boundary is. Let me know if you have any more questions.

BubbaJuice
Henny Vianelde (2024-05-29 03:34:01+00:00): Great Job, Keep Mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151969237
Henny Vianelde (2024-05-29 03:32:35+00:00): Great Job, Keep Mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151969241
Henny Vianelde (2024-05-29 03:35:08+00:00): Great Job, Keep Mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151969323
Henny Vianelde (2024-05-29 03:37:30+00:00): Great Job, Keep Mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151969341
Henny Vianelde (2024-05-29 03:37:04+00:00): Great Job, Keep Mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151969346
Henny Vianelde (2024-05-29 03:36:46+00:00): Great Job, Keep Mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151969350
Henny Vianelde (2024-05-29 03:35:45+00:00): Great Job, Keep Mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151969351
Henny Vianelde (2024-05-29 03:38:54+00:00): Great Job, Keep Mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151969400
Henny Vianelde (2024-05-29 03:37:54+00:00): Great Job, Keep Mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151969405
mikimapbuilder (2024-05-29 08:01:41+00:00): Hi! When adding a building, try to follow a building footprint that matches the geometry. Cheers!
phoenixsaigon1698 (2024-12-29 01:42:24+00:00): Ngõ này mình xem streetView thấy oto đi được mà nhỉ?
Frans S (2024-05-29 09:26:29+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please use the correct tag for  traces leading only to farmland /woods.
'track' is here the preferable tag.
Please consult this wiki
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway#Special_road_types
mcliquid (2024-05-29 08:12:21+00:00): I believe you could have split the changeset between the mainland and the islands with the simplest of means. Please think about it next time.
NKA (2024-05-29 08:23:47+00:00): How? I am not touching any of the islands.
mcliquid (2024-05-29 08:43:06+00:00): I see, Bouvetøya is part of relation 2978650.
Agusman119 (2024-05-29 04:12:20+00:00): Please Good Review
phoenixsaigon1698 (2024-06-03 16:34:30+00:00): Hi GrabVN_trampm, if you put motorcar=destination because this kind of road can not access by motorcar I understand But DO NOT delete motorcycle=yes because the motorcycle can travel to this road. It is not redundant
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151970427
MyoKyawKyaw (2024-05-29 08:24:31+00:00): Thanks for your contribution in survey mapping. The mapping looks great with great survey POIs and also the clear changeset comment. Keep contributing, Cheers!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151970970
Supaplex (2024-05-29 06:40:46+00:00): 如果沒有實際交疊，請不要重疊路徑
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151971200
zxc123k (2024-05-29 08:32:35+00:00): 放心，實地勘察才畫上去，你也可以親自去踏查看看
zxc123k (2024-05-29 08:35:00+00:00): 之前的路線也是我畫的，今日重新勘查修正，把前一個路徑已經刪除了，應該不會重疊
Supaplex (2024-05-29 13:38:39+00:00): 不是，你新加的路徑頭尾習慣跟其他相交的路徑會在交叉處重疊一起。可以注意內建編輯器的警告訊息。
zxc123k (2024-05-29 13:57:49+00:00): 原來如此，那是因為每次規劃路線時，發現很多圖客路線都沒連接好，以致在basecamp規劃［航線］時，會產生中斷現象，既然交叉重疊被警告，下次再畫時會改進。

謝謝提醒!
jmarchon (2024-05-29 14:50:20+00:00): Thank you!
Madi-Red (2024-07-02 08:38:22+00:00): Hello aartipawar
Thank you for mapping!
As per aerial imagery there is no water_tower. Hence we can align the polygon to reality and add building=yes tag as per aerial imagery.
Please inspect your task carefully before closing.
Happy Mapping!
mikimapbuilder (2024-05-29 08:02:48+00:00): Hi! You draw a building over the backyard, try to avoid that. Thanks!
mikimapbuilder (2024-05-29 08:03:21+00:00): Hi! You draw a building over the backyard, try to avoid that. Thanks!
melody_Tej (2024-07-02 08:59:58+00:00): Hello POOJAGAWARI Thank you for mapping! Here we can add building=apartments tag. Please inspect your task carefully before closing. Happy Mapping!
mavl (2024-05-29 06:37:16+00:00): Здравствуйте. Исправил.  
  
Этот пакет правок удалил со здания детского сада тег здания.  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/284965727/history  
  
Также на это здание был добавлен тег детского сада. Но этот детский сад уже обозначен. Два одинаковых детских сада на карте не нужны.  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/635222471  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:building
mavl (2024-05-29 06:38:52+00:00): И ещё. Напишите, пожалуйста, у вас есть разрешение от Яндекса и 2ГИС на использование их данных для улучшения OpenStreetMap?
mavl (2024-06-14 13:36:58+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок добавляет парк внутрь здания, что, конечно же, не соответствует действительности. И это место не Уральск, а Таиланд. Пожалуйста, добавляйте в OpenStreetMap данные о реальных объектах. Этот и другие ваши пакеты правок будут отменены, так как не соответствуют реальности.
map per (2024-06-01 20:13:28+00:00): Hallo Street explorer,

und wilkommen bei OpenStreetMap!

Welche Quellen verwendest du für deine massenhaften cycleway:both=no Eintragungen. Das sieht nicht so aus als würdest du StreetComplete so verwenden wie es gedacht ist und Daten vor Ort erheben.

Danke und viel Grüße
map per
Ilovemap1999 (2024-05-30 07:16:28+00:00): https://www.mapillary.com/app/?panos=true&lat=10.786280471840314&lng=106.5946040424758&z=19.9&trafficSign=all&focus=photo&pKey=1359162664688805&x=0.45421186217972126&y=0.5504570231684293&zoom=0 . Based on mapillary images, there are restriction for car at both ends under the bridge. If you don't have any newest proofs, please do not edit like you did "removing motor_vehicle=no".
TrickyFoxy (2024-05-31 11:12:20+00:00): 👋 H=ML-3 What did you mean?
borovac (2024-05-31 11:19:16+00:00): Sure, here is the translation of the text from Serbian to English:

Hi Tricky
I probably accidentally replaced this ISO: ISO3166-2 with the letter 'H' when I was selecting the history.
Thanks, I will correct it now.

All best Milan (borovac)
borovac (2024-05-31 11:27:45+00:00): Hello again,
I fixed the change that I accidentally made incorrectly.
Thank you one again.
All best Milan
silversurfer83 (2024-05-29 16:24:49+00:00): Gude :)

danke, dass du dich um diese teilweise recht offensichtlichen "Fehler" kümmerst.

Nachdem ich mal über diese Änderung drüber geschaut habe, hätte ich zwei Anmerkungen:

- diesen Parkplatz müsstest du dir nochmal ansehen. Da hast du möglicherweise die Haupteigenschaft (Parkplatz) gekillt https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/426484299

- Bitte mach solche Sachen in Zukunft kleinteiliger. Diese Änderung erstreckt sich einmal über Deutschland und macht es Menschen, die sich mit der QS ein wenig beschäftigen, schwerer. Details dazu hat dieser Artikel im Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Bei Fragen immer raus damit
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151973694
melody_Tej (2024-07-02 09:00:16+00:00): Hello POOJAGAWARI Thank you for mapping! here we can gave building=yes tag Please inspect your task carefully before closing. Happy Mapping!
Ilovemap1999 (2024-05-30 07:28:06+00:00): Why did you remove tag "oneway=yes"? Any proofs? Please do not edit without envidences
tordans (2024-05-30 08:29:34+00:00): FYI ich habe in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152021710 diese Änderungen vorgenommen:

- Fläche anhand der Hintergrundkarte "Straßenbefahrung" präzisiert. Die ist für solche Fälle wo es markierte Stellplätze gibt sehr hilfreich.
- Anzahl korrigiert, es sind 14
- Poller ergänzt.

VG, Tobias
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151974277
Tomas Straupis (2024-05-30 04:15:12+00:00): Laba diena. Ačiū už pakeitimus, visgi šioje vietoje yra VIENAS objektas, vienas plovimo objektas, o ne trys. Tai atitinkamai ir amenity=car_wash turėtų būti vienas. Kadangi per visus pastatus jis yra, tai, matyt, reikia tiesiog kaip atskirą tašką pažymėti.
rempshaener (2024-05-29 15:04:16+00:00): Hallo,
das bisherige Tagging entsprach der Ausschilderung vor Ort, d.h. mit DE:260,DE:1026-39,DE:1026-36.
Könntest du deine Änderung kurz erklären?
Viele Grüße
Jorisbo (2024-05-29 16:00:35+00:00): Hallo rempshaener, das unterschied ist mich nicht genau klar, habe es geändert da die mehrfachige werten (im besonderes the agriculutrral/forestry) nicht immer richtig zu interpretieren sind fur routing. Aber habe es zuruck genadert, grusse Joris
rempshaener (2024-05-29 16:10:16+00:00): Dankeschön
IreuN (2024-07-23 22:20:25+00:00): Hej, co to za paczkomat? Jakiej marki? Mógłbyś dodać więcej tagów?
Dawid2849 (2024-07-23 23:17:53+00:00): Jak pod Biedronką to strzelam, że Pocztex. Opcjonalnie Orlen Paczka
Dawid2849 (2024-07-23 23:18:08+00:00): Ale na 90% Pocztex
IreuN (2024-07-23 23:32:06+00:00): Faktycznie pocztex, dodałem tagi, dziękuję! :)
Piz Pachific (2024-05-29 10:59:04+00:00): Why do you delete some correct wikidata-tags?
Bogomil Shopov - Бого (2024-05-29 11:17:14+00:00): Hi, I was following the directions here: 

Things like a sport are never directly linkable from wikidata/wikipedia tags - they can be linked in some cases from properly prefixed secondary tags - and in some should be removed.

For example subject:wikipedia to link subject of a sculpture - wikipedia tag is for linking article about sculpture itself, not about what it is depicting). And name:etymology:wikidata links Wikidata entry that describes source of name of a given object.

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikipedia#Secondary_Wikipedia_links and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikidata#Secondary_Wikidata_links

In some cases these links are utterly invalid/mismatching/hopelessly generic and should be rather removed.

please send a message to https://www.openstreetmap.org/message/new/Mateusz%20Konieczny if anything is wrong with this listing or it causes people to make bad edits
Kpdrg (2024-06-15 23:27:51+00:00): Moin, 
ist auch die Straße bis zum Bahnhof nicht mehr vorhanden?
Es sieht so aus, als ob du nicht nur den Fußweg, sondern auch die Straße gelöscht hast. Stimmt das?
Pardalus (2024-06-17 07:11:17+00:00): Sorry, die Straße ist natürlich noch da... Keine Ahnung, wie das passiert ist. Jetzt sollte alles wieder passen, inklusive Verlauf von R4.
tordans (2024-05-30 08:23:43+00:00): Hinweis: Für den Fall, dass dieser Stellplatz auch mit Pollern geschützt ist, könntest du diese an den jew. Ecken eintragen. VG
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151974830
divaddivag (2024-05-29 10:57:25+00:00): Hi barefootstache, it looks like your alignment is based on an imagery that itself is not properly aligned! Do you want me to revert that one? Have a good time in sunny Normandy D
barefootstache (2024-05-30 13:20:49+00:00): Hey divaddivag, the alignment was only done 10m circumference off the node: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11941542944 and since the path (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/958256696#map=14/49.3891/-0.9387) was moved ever so slightly on the eastern side, the changeset looks bigger than it should be. Will hike it the next couple of days to get a better GPX reading and we can conclude after that if a reversion is needed.
barefootstache (2024-05-30 13:45:47+00:00): Will start using the BDOrtho IGN imagery and fix the alignment issues again...
divaddivag (2024-05-31 08:41:48+00:00): Thanks for your quick reply and reverting your changeset. The Ortho from IGN is fairly recent, June 2023 for Calvados but could be older elsewhere (each département is updated every 3/4 years) and is quite accurate on ground level. It is a better move to use it while mapping in France. Interestingly in the area, the Bing imagery is at a higher resolution than IGN and although it is not well aligned and older, it can be useful to check that one as well. If you have any comments or questions, feel free to ask and I hope you are enjoying your stay . David
Geo-Tobi (2025-01-12 07:56:14+00:00): Hi, du hast hier agricultural=yes hinzugefügt. Das entspricht dem Schild "Traktor frei". War das wirklich so beabsichtigt oder wolltest du hier "landwirtschaftlicher Verkehr frei" abbilden? Das wäre dann Access=agricultural. (Häufiger Fehler)
Noktoborus (2024-10-04 18:16:45+00:00): Константин, здравствуйте!
дорога https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1083832178/history/15 не имеет признаков, которые бы определяли её как "только для пешеходов": запрещающих знаков или других средств ограничения трафика нет, фото перекрёстка с видом на данную дорогу можно посмотреть здесь: https://t.me/ruosm/842315
Константин Гам (2024-10-05 14:17:35+00:00): Здравствуйте! 
Я выехал в адрес, проверить актуальность всей дороги, позднее отпишу
Noktoborus (2024-10-05 14:19:15+00:00): Спасибо большое!
Константин Гам (2024-10-05 14:52:23+00:00): https://postimg.cc/871x20sw

На данной схеме я так понимаю уже ответ на все вопросы
Константин Гам (2024-10-05 15:12:11+00:00): Изза стройки, открыли от кладбища на восток https://postimg.cc/MvxQ87wd
Константин Гам (2024-10-05 15:18:28+00:00): Судя по картинке на восточном конце и перекрестке - сделали проезд в университет.
А знаки 1 по старому, 3 по новому...

Обновлю вечером .
Noktoborus (2024-10-05 16:03:03+00:00): 👍
tordans (2024-05-30 08:22:55+00:00): Hallo Ahmet, ich habe unter https://osmcha.org/changesets/152018883 ein paar Änderungen vorgenommen:
- Die Fahrradstellplätz-Fläche von der Baumscheibe entknüpft. So eine teilweise Verklebung ist nicht hilfreich und nicht so hübsch, vor allem…
- Stattdessn dann die Fläche mit Pollern an den Ecken ausgestattet (laut Mapillary)
- Außerdem konnte man im Vegleich zu Layer Straßenbefahrung+Mapillary sehen, das die Bordsteinkante nicht passte im Folgenden, die habe ich angepasst. (Das ist IMO nichts, was wir erwarten würden, nur zur Info dass es hier auch passiert ist.)

VG, Tobias
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151975244
SD Mapman (2024-06-04 13:57:59+00:00): Hi! Thanks for your contributions! Just so you're aware, abbreviating route ref modifiers is against the community norms for tagging route refs (see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/kevinajames95-currently-mangling-tags-along-route-66-and-bannered-routes-elsewhere/106723). Feel free to join that thread for discussion. Thanks again!
eggie (2024-05-29 14:27:37+00:00): Dag a_tyrin

Je hebt de building tag verwijderd
De gegevens van het mortuarium stonden al op de adresnode.
Nu zie je geen gebouw meer.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-05-29 14:30:42+00:00): Gebouw tag hersteld.
Kennelijk rendert amenity=mortuary niet op een node.
MVG
eggie
opendcc (2024-05-29 08:31:43+00:00): Hallo,
bitte beachte: Bing Luftbilder sind (teilweise) deutlich veraltet und eine Leitung, die man auf Bing sieht ist schon abgebaut. Bitte benutze im Bayern immer das aktuellste Luftbild - das ist i.d.R. das vom Landesvermessungsamt (DOP80), welches alle zwei Jahre erneuert wird. Bing hat zudem Parallax-Probleme, was gerade im hügeligem Gelände zu Fehlern führt.

Hier sind aktuell Masten zurückgeblieben, die schon nicht mehr gibt.

Servus
MK2705 (2024-05-30 05:55:34+00:00): Servus,

das aktuellste Luftbild in dieser Region ist zur Zeit das von Apple Maps (September 2023), das DOP80 ist leider qualitativ nicht besonders gut und mittlerweile auch schon ca. 2 Jahre alt (Sommer 2022). DOP40 ist ebenfalls frei ferfügbar, aber leider auch nicht aktueller. Befliegung läuft aber schon.
Bing ist zugegebenermaßen schon von 2021. Relevanter als der Parallax-Unterschied aufgrund des unterschiedlichen Raumbezugsystems (< 30 cm) ist aber wohl der Unterschied im Aufnahmewinkel der Orthophotos.

Masten sollten keine Zurückgeblieben sein, nur die, die tatsächlich noch stehen.

Servus
mini-me (2024-05-29 15:41:57+00:00): Нельзя просто так взять и не сломать маршруты используя iD. Он не сортирует участников отношения как того требует схема PTv2. Да и разрывы в маршруте не отлавливает. Пример: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3215589#map=16/59.7494/30.5668
Для таких сложных правок лучше использовать JOSM с плагином pt_assistant.