piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
RicoElectrico (2025-08-13 14:39:03+00:00): Cześć,

Czy w tej edycji miały być dodane 2 AED, czy to pomyłka?  https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13057416301/history/1 oraz https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13057417401/history/1

Daj znać, jeśli będzie trzeba, to pomogę poprawić.

Pozdrawiam
olo81 (2025-08-08 13:17:45+00:00): Po pierwsze jest to nazwa opisowa, nazwa jest tylko nazwą a nie opisem miejsca. 
Po drugie jeśli ośrodek już nie istnieje, dlaczego go dodajesz?
C2oc4 (2025-08-15 06:07:54+00:00): poprawiono
olo81 (2025-08-18 20:54:40+00:00): Zostawiłeś landuse=commercial co nie jest prawdą.
aharvey (2025-09-03 11:38:14+00:00): sounds like it should also have https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bridge=boardwalk
aharvey (2025-09-03 11:38:53+00:00): sorry my mistake, you've already applied that to the true boardwalk sections
bdentremont (2025-08-09 20:01:28+00:00): Good job with your first edit.

I've added amenity=cafe since this place seems to sell prepared drinks not captured by the shop=coffee tag alone.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=coffee
bdentremont (2025-08-09 20:03:16+00:00): Oh.  I see you did this with CoMaps which probably forces you to pick one and only one of these tags.  Anyway, fixed now.
notmyproblem1 (2026-04-02 06:47:58+00:00): Reason to delete the 3 b&b in Via Torino? They still seems in work...

Motivo per la cancellazione dei 3 b&b in Via Torino? Sembrano che esistono ancora...
bbgg (2026-04-04 07:26:12+00:00): non ricordo e non riesco a capire quali erano dal changeset. 
Forse erano duplicati
user_5359 (2025-08-09 09:07:41+00:00): Hallo! Bitte sieh Dir mal die Stolpersteine unter https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/29Ac an. Hier scheint ein copy&paste Fehler vorzuliegen (tag Heinz = Zilversmit)
gmbo (2025-08-09 11:10:14+00:00): Danke für die Info
fs_LT (2025-08-08 06:15:32+00:00): siehe Diskussion https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170119458
fs_LT (2025-08-08 06:16:57+00:00): wurde revertiert; Zufahrtsstraße wurde gelöscht; https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170137405
Thunderbag (2025-09-02 18:35:19+00:00): Hi,
why die you revert my whole change just for one intersecting building alert?
Kovoschiz (2025-08-08 08:48:22+00:00): 1. Please don't interpret category names literally. `=recreation_ground` means a general area for playing or enjoyment. This has 2 parts. 
2. The article you cite for `access=private` has nothing to do with this, not being on roofs.
3. Please don't guess such names, as it seems wrong in the first place. And a Sitting-out Area is not `=recreation_ground` either.
ultisol (2025-08-08 09:24:30+00:00): 1. It is not a park because there is very little greenery. If you watch the video linked in the first article, at around 1:35 you can see what the drone shows you.
2. I did not cite an article for access=private. That is local knowledge. After around 2020 when this residential area became famous on social media so many people came here to take photos, the residents complained and the building management installed a security system where only residents can enter the compound with electronic cards.
3. I did not guess the names. The second link I linked was to a local property website which includes the layout for that compound. Because this is Hong Kong, businesses are supposed to provide both an English and Traditional Chinese service and that is where it comes from. The name "Sitting-Out Area" was not created by me. It was given by the property website. As for it being a recreation ground, look at the video in the first link as I have said in my first point. It shows you what the actual condition on the ground is like.

Finally, please don't assume that others are "guessing".
Kovoschiz (2025-08-08 12:03:54+00:00): 1. Can you please check what's definition of a `=recreation_ground` first? I'm already using the loose definition. The strict definition is a grassy area, which this doesn't qualify either. You can already see from imagery it has 2 parts, not one area. Parks, at least in HK, doesn't have that much green space  when hard courts are used, but those are still open space.  
2. Can you clariy what you mean by "the compound"? It's rare for a small outside part to be access-controlled alone on its own. 
3. What "local property website"? Indeed, I have to conclude you have no knowledge and awareness on this topic, and guessed what it is. But actually anyone could have seen it's obviously a a very low quality website, with suspicious data source, which you can't copy directly and wholly from government data either. Again, the website has "all rights reserved", meaning you can't immediately safely copy from it as well. 
4. Of course, I have to assume you guessed this for some reasons. "Sitting-out area" is the very textbook and awkward naming by government given to a very specific government facility type, which exactly has little open space, and at least more vegetation than this. They are gazetted and listed in the law. It's almost impossible for them to be named from a building. It's also not "休憩地方", but "休憩處“, if you can really read Cantonese, and know how they are named in HK. Lastly, yes, it's an quite obvious thing to assume someone who have edited all over the world in other countries may not have local knowledge, as compared to someone who have edited much here. 
You can continue to discuss together with others in the community https://discord.com/invite/CyG9zte
vectorial8192 (2025-08-08 14:13:12+00:00): Hi all!

Lai Tak Tsuen is a HKHS property. HK-gov naming rules may not automatically apply here. We need to hold our horses and be careful.

However, this being a HKHS property makes `access=private` very believable, despite Kovoschiz's belief.
Frans S (2025-08-22 10:52:46+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping. 
We welcome you as a new mapper.

Please check the purpose of this project.
Focus and map waterways and farmland areas.
Best regards and keep mapping
fs_LT (2025-08-08 07:39:31+00:00): bitte beachte https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Erhalte_die_Chronik%E2%86%99 und lösche keine Straßen/Objekte um an fast der selben Stelle neue anzulegen; ändere lieber die vorhandenen ab, somit bleibt die Historie erhalten;

zudem fehlen nach deiner Änderung nun Eigenschaften wie surface=asphalt, maxspeed=10, source:maxspeed=sign .. sind diese Eigenschaften OTG wirklich nicht mehr vorhanden?
custodiankeyy (2025-08-08 20:51:42+00:00): Binaları silmek yerine tekrar konumlandırabilirsiniz. Hem böylece elementin geçmişini de korumuş olursunuz. 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170137918

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history
eggie (2025-08-08 07:58:19+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
syncronic (2025-08-08 18:48:46+00:00): Hallo Evros,
könnte es vielleicht sein, dass das Bing Maps Luftbild viel zu alt ist? Insbesondere beim Steakhouse scheint mir die alte Variante die richtige zu sein.
Evros1969 (2025-08-09 05:30:30+00:00): Hallo syncronic, das Gebäude ist vor 3Jahre komplett erneuert worden. Ich habe versucht zum Kartieren wie möglich auch Bilder gepostet. Schöne Tag noch.
Evros1969 (2025-08-09 06:51:37+00:00): https://www.planungsbuero-kundler.de/referenzen/clubhaus
syncronic (2025-08-11 12:36:54+00:00): Hallo Evros,
ich hab das neue Gebäude vor 2 Jahren gezeichnet. Mein Eindruck ist, das du jetzt wieder das alte Gebäude eingetragen hast, weil Bing Maps hier älter als 3 Jahre ist.
旧加卷 (2025-08-09 14:39:46+00:00): 请勿删除正确的建筑路径，地图上的一个建筑对应实地实际存在的建筑，土地用途区域请勿使用建筑物标签。地图标记与实际物理属性不符。方言不应使用loc_name标签。
b-jazz (2025-08-09 02:06:56+00:00): RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1088041689

When drawing golf course areas (i.e. greens, fairways, bunkers, tees, etc.), please be aware that the ways (lines) used to outline those areas must not cross over each other. Fairway outlines shouldn't cross over greens or bunkers or other fairways for example. Take a look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Golf.png for an example of the "Wrong" way to map a fairway and a green along with the right way. There are some cases where a fringe exists around a green and you should draw the fairway outline completely around a green. Other times, the fairway and green butt up against each other. In that case the fairway and green should share the same nodes at the boundary between the two. When drawing these shared nodes, editors like iD (built into openstreetmap.org) will "snap" to an existing node if you get close enough. If you could go back and clean up where you've made this mistake, that would be great. But more importantly, if you could stop from doing this in the future, it would be greatly appreciated. If you have any questions about golf course mapping, feel free to reach out. Thanks.
b-jazz (2025-08-09 02:10:43+00:00): (On deeper inspection, I see that you were just removing extraneous dense nodes and you weren't the original created of the crossing of the fairway over the green. So you can ignore the comment above (unless you're interested in cleaning it up anyway).
bdiscoe (2025-08-09 09:35:21+00:00): Hi b-jazz, yes I was only doing cleanup, and I do try to validate the features as I go, but there are many weird golf courses in the world which the JOSM validator can't catch.  Thanks for your vigilance on golf messes :)
bdiscoe (2025-08-09 09:43:14+00:00): I went back just now and did a few more fixes on that golf course, including where the path has tunnels.  I didn't see any crossing ways to fix.
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2025-08-10 14:12:00+00:00): 我看前几天好心湖旁边还没有这些水池，今天突然刷新出来的（因为渲染器时效问题）

我猜您也是看了 https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV19gtqzEEr1 来的（？）

↑「在广东茂名，有一个大坑突然变成了湖」 2025-08-07 19:03:29 轨迹球TRACKBALL
fs_LT (2025-08-08 07:45:26+00:00): bite beachte auch hier https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Erhalte_die_Chronik%E2%86%99 und https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lebenszyklus-Pr%C3%A4fix; der von dir gelöschte node ist 5 Jahre alt, war ein cafe, dann "Danisman in der Au", dann "Cafe in der Au" (siehe https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/node/7050497887) und nun ist er weg; wenn also in einiger Zeit wieder etwas eröffnet ist die Historie dahin;
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170139749
Yepoleb (2025-08-11 06:14:55+00:00): Würdest du den Punkt als disused:amenity wiederherstellen? Aktuell wird das Cafe bei Bedarf von den Vereinen selbstständig betrieben, nach meinen Informationen von Gemeindebediensteten.
habi (2025-08-08 08:20:52+00:00): Mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170141494 revertiert, in https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4898392 diskutiert und in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170141963 verbessert.
NieWnen (2025-08-08 17:15:25+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4569744
teppic (2025-08-13 19:21:40+00:00): Lantmäteriet/NVDB has clearly erratic data on these roads (Draredsvägen, Johansforsvägen, and Gamla Nissastigen).

I have contacted Halmstad Kommun to verify and update their data, but in the meantime I suggest using the existing road signs, which I am certain is a more correct representation.
archie (2025-08-13 21:20:51+00:00): Det finns en Gamla Nissanstigen i Oskarsström vid Brandshult, men du har namngivit även vägen upp till Johansfors med detta namn. Detta kan inte verifieras. Det finns t ex inga postadresser längs vägen med detta vägnamn. Det görs mycket namngivning och skyltning av vägarna i turistsyfte. 
Eftersom du har gjort en framställan om detta till kommunen, så avvaktar vi till dess att dessa vägnamn har blivit officiella. Vad beträffar vägnamnsskyltarna, så finns det så vitt jag mins en (1) skylt med "G:a Nissanstigen" men vid Johansfors har samma väg vägnamnsskylten "Brandshultsvägen". 
Så det är i högsta grad oklart huruvida vägen har ett namn och vilket namn som är det rätta.
teppic (2025-08-13 22:23:08+00:00): > du har namngivit även vägen upp till Johansfors med detta namn. Detta kan inte verifieras.

Är medveten om att min tidigare edit var lite förhastad.

Är dock inte helt med på resonemanget kring att det är "högst oklart" vad vägarna har för namn då det, precis som du nämner, finns skyltar, samt att husen längs vägen har någon av de två gatunamnen i sin adress, vilket ger en en ganska bra ledtråd om sträckningen.

Det enda som är oklart är...
1. ...exakt var Gamla Nissastigen slutar och var Draredsvägen tar vid. Detta handlar om en sträcka på ca 400m, om man mäter avståndet mellan sista huset som tillhör Gamla Nissastigen (180) och första som tillhör Draredsvägen (5).
2. ...hur långt Draredsvägen sträcker sig mot österut från Johansfors.

Hänvisar också till "on the ground principle" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Good_practice). Finns det andra principer och riktlinjer som trumfar detta får du gärna länka.

Jag anser att det trots allt går att göra en rimlig slutsats baserat på den data som finns till hands.

Om man vill ta det säkra före det osäkra så kan vi väl låta den ovissa sträckan på 400 meter förbli namnlös, men att namnge resten av vägen enligt den information som finns tillgänglig?
teppic (2025-08-13 22:34:16+00:00): Korrigering:

När jag skriver "draredsvägen" här så menar jag "brandshultsvägen". Jag blandar ofta ihop dessa två namn av någon anledning.
archie (2025-08-14 05:57:32+00:00): Ja, det är inte lätt i detta läge att säga var Gamla Nissanstigen slutar och var Brandshultsvägen börjar, när detta inte framgår av NVDB eller lantmäteriet. Det är mycket möjligt att den ena börjar där den andra slutar (dvs omfattar de av dig namända 400 meter). Det är förmodligen så.  Men vad jag kan se så finns inga data som visar att vägen bär namn Gamla Nissanstigen även efter Brandshultsvägen.
NieWnen (2025-08-08 17:19:37+00:00): Ta Nadrzeczna to trochę chyba za bardzo :P Jak ktoś będzie z Krakowskiej jechał w stronę parku to go nawigacja może pokierować naokoło (płn. Nadrzeczną).
Asteliks (2025-08-09 11:46:58+00:00): Hej, domyślam się, że chodzi Ci o wjazd od południa z Alei Krakowskiej.
Parametr "use_sidepath" w nawigacji nie jest tak twardą blokadą jak "no". Właśnie dlatego dodaliśmy coś takiego jak "use_sidepath" — informuje on nawigację, że warunkowo może skorzystać z tej drogi. Przykład tutaj: https://brouter.de/brouter-web/#map=19/52.15135/20.91880/cyclosm&lonlats=20.917529,52.151223;20.918529,52.151281&profile=safety
NieWnen (2025-08-09 12:45:44+00:00): Część pewnie sobie z tym poradzi, a część nie, zależnie od ustawionych wag i interpretacji, bo w końcu ten tag może mieć nieco ciut inne założenia (przepisy) zależnie od kraju. 

Zobacz na np. GraphHoppera co robi :P

Ja ogólnie dzielę w takich miejscach i nie dodaję tam gdzie jest to "niemożliwe", żeby nie pojechać jezdnią.
Asteliks (2025-08-09 14:33:21+00:00): Sprawdzając na szybko widzę, że radzą sobie Valhalla, OSRM i BRouter. GraphHopper faktycznie sobie nie radzi.
Masz rację — na wszelki wypadek można podzielić na przejściu dla pieszych (pytanie tylko, czy GraphHopper wpuści wtedy na ten fragment chodnika). Cieszę się, że to dostrzegłeś, i nie krępuj się podzielić
Asteliks (2025-08-09 14:34:04+00:00): chyba że wolisz żebym ja podzieli?
NieWnen (2025-08-09 15:22:45+00:00): Zmieniłem.
Asteliks (2025-08-09 16:14:27+00:00): Super, dziękuję
Tomas Straupis (2025-08-08 08:33:48+00:00): Laba diena. Mindaugo gatvė yra tik ten, kur Mindaugo gatvė. Privažiavimai neturi jokio pavadinimo.
Kiekvieno mikro-kioskelio kaip atskiros prekyvietės (marketplace) žymėti tikrai nereikia. PARKING yra tai, kas pažymėta kelio ženklu P. Jei ženklo nėra, tai nėra amenity=parking (privatus tada, kai būna P ženklas ir tada lentelė, kad „tik ABC“).
DodoGTA (2025-11-10 17:02:34+00:00): @Tomas Straupis O ar "P Rezervuota" ženklas irgi yra access=private/privatus parkavimas?
Tomas Straupis (2025-11-10 20:16:12+00:00): Iš principo taip. Klausimas tik kokia nauda iš tokios informacijos, jei vis tiek 99% ten parkuotis negali?
Benoît C MdP (2025-09-02 14:16:41+00:00): Bonjour LAZACARTO,

Tu as doublonné la piste cyclable qui était déjà présente sur un way séparé - comme indiqué dans le tag "cycleway=separate". J'ai corrgié.

Bonne continuation

Benoît
richlv (2025-08-08 16:27:50+00:00): Thank you for the map improvements.
Please note that most address changes will be reverted by an automatic process.
In Latvia, addresses are updated from the official VZD data - thus, for example, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1395325394/history will get the address returned soon.

If there is a wish to change the addresses, this should be handled through the local council. Once those changes trickle into the VZD data, they will also appear in OSM data.

We also invite any OSM related discussions on the Latvian OSM community chat, https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com .
user_5359 (2025-08-09 09:43:59+00:00): A small note: The bot didn't process the tag ‘pasts:adreses_id = A_02623417’, even though it presumably belongs to information about an address. 

Hence the question: What does this tag mean?
richlv (2025-08-11 09:24:32+00:00): That's a good question. It's not a valid tag. It might have something to do with internal data at Latvijas pasts, but at least one such ID was not found in a quick online search.
Address information is correlated to the official data via ref:LV:addr key/tag.

Rozkalns, is there anything important to preserve from that tag (changing it somehow)?
If not, will clean it up a bit later.
Rozkalns (2025-08-11 12:32:01+00:00): I didn't know what is this ref:lv key. I wanted to compare it to pasts.lv address id (found in https://pasts.lv/parbaudit-adresi). Didn't match.
Since there is no restrictions for the keys that could be used, I just figured out why not to add it. Although, I am not sure how pasts.lv them self uses this id.
richlv (2025-08-11 19:35:57+00:00): Thanks, that mostly clarifies it.
ref:LV:addr is a tag that community has decided to match addresses to the official cadaster data.
As addresses are not assigned by LP, I'd assume their identifiers are post-factum, mostly for their own purposes.
Also not sure whether those are properly licensed as open data, thus they might be best discarded for now.

This seems like a great topic for the Zulip community chat, we might continue there :)
user_5359 (2025-08-12 15:53:43+00:00): I must thank you for the explanation in your answer to my question. 

And since I personally detect a slight reproach in your answer: Yes, of course, you can come up with new keys. 

However, we try to use British English for key names, as it appears to be a reference to a data source in LV (which usually leads to the prefix ref:LV:) and and. 

You can document this ambiguity with a comment under the key note or ask the local community (which has already been offered). 

I must apologise for overlooking this: *Welcome to OSM!* The important thing is to still have fun with OSM, even if someone comes along and asks how to understand the key. :)
Yepoleb (2025-08-11 00:48:19+00:00): Sah das immer schon so kaputt aus oder ist das durch das Entfernen der tunnel Tags entstanden? Ich kenn die Regel mit "nicht für den Renderer mappen", aber so ist das doch auch unbrauchbar.
fs_LT (2025-08-11 04:03:54+00:00): Habe es mir gerade in maps.me und OrganicMaps angeshen ... sah auch vorher so aus ....
Yepoleb (2025-08-11 05:24:40+00:00): Meinst du man kann die obere Etage löschen, solang es kein sinnvolles Schema für das Indoormapping von Parkgaragen gibt? Ich finde nämlich kein Schema, das dafür sorgt, dass nicht mehrere Ebenen übereinander gezeichnet werden.
fs_LT (2025-08-11 05:26:10+00:00): von mir aus gerne ... ich bin nur drüber gestolpert und habe halt ein wenig angepasst ... kannst gerne den 1. Stock entfernen
Yepoleb (2025-08-12 13:30:19+00:00): Hab ich gerade erledigt https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170342351
eggie (2025-08-08 08:22:37+00:00): Dag Rijckaert,
Svp geen motor_vehicle=no zetten op paaltjes. 
Ik heb het verwijderd.
Dan kan dan weer problemen opleveren voor moped en mofa.
Een paaltje zal niet routeren voor autoverkeer. 
Weet jij wat dit voor een fietspad is..
foot=yes is trouwens default.. ook op fietspaden en tracks. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-08-08 08:25:45+00:00): Vermoedelijk een NL:G13 pad gezien de overige fietspaden in de wijk. 
Nog iets om uit te zoeken..
https://smoothefiets.ddns.net/html/verkeersbordenkaart/index.php?lat=51.436293878&lng=5.525238992&z=18

moped=no, mofa=no, traffic_sign=NL:G13
Hufkratzer (2025-08-08 20:42:36+00:00): Hi,
ich weiß nicht genau was https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1420897748 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1420897749 für Flächen sind, aber nach Reitanlagen im Sinne von  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure=horse_riding sehen die nicht aus. Hier ist ein Beispiel für eine Reitanlage: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/48914555#map=18/54.262063/10.305728&layers=P , vgl. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a/R#Reitstall
Eike_M (2025-08-14 08:52:26+00:00): Es sind Plätze auf denen geritten wird. 
Reitplatz (leisure=pitch
sport=equestrian) passt wohl besser. 

Ich setze eine neue Änderung an. Danke fürs kommentieren!
Eike_M (2025-08-14 08:55:23+00:00): Achso was mir gerade noch auffällt: Die Luftbilder von OSM sind veraltet, es sind wirklich Sand-Reitplätze. Google Maps hat aktuelle Bilder. Gemapped habe ich anhand inaugenscheinname Vor Ort.
Hufkratzer (2025-08-14 12:46:39+00:00): Vor-Ort-Kenntnis ist natürlich immer am besten.
Wenn's Sandplätze sind, hättest du surface=sand hinzufügen können; kann man ja im Editor auswählen. Muss natürlich nicht sein.
BCNorwich (2025-08-08 12:27:15+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I don't think the pickup point would be inside the building as you've positioned it. As per:- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=taxi,  it should be at the point where taxis wait. Could you please correct the position.

Regards Bernard.
Szymson (2025-08-12 16:11:21+00:00): Błędne rozdzielenie jezdni:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1420900325
eggie (2025-08-08 10:00:58+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Kovoschiz (2025-08-11 18:06:00+00:00): 1. Please use meaningful upload comments summarizing your edit 
2. Please reply and explain what you want to do https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170116293
maro21 (2025-08-08 17:56:18+00:00): Dla mnie ważne jest poprawne pisanie po polsku. A dla ciebie co jest ważne?
pavvv (2025-08-08 18:33:12+00:00): Co powoduje, że liczba mnoga zmienia rodzaj obiektu na dużą literę? To wciąż nie nazwa własna, a bardziej opis (ale nie taki na description=*), że znajdują się tu dwa mosty Uniwersyteckie.
AwFi (2025-08-21 12:42:31+00:00): Ciao👋, 
come da messaggio privato che ti ho scritto, hai aggiunto una stazione duplicata che era già presente, potresti controllare i messaggi privati e guardare ai suggerimenti che ti ho mandato?
Aspetterò ancora un paio di giorni poi, nel caso, sistemerò io direttamente.
ultisol (2025-08-08 09:32:59+00:00): Please see my response to you on your comment on my changeset. Why do you revert a changeset 3 minutes after commenting, without even waiting for a response? Shouldn't we wait at least for a day for the other mapper to respond?
abouter (2025-08-08 09:56:05+00:00): dat was snel opgelost, bedankt!
Mappy Carter (2025-08-08 11:36:52+00:00): Who is this Archie policing changes???
Should not my house build 1904, one of the oldest houses in Olofsbo be in the map? And the other houses from 1927, 1935, 1943, veranda extention 2015 guest house 2018, all approved by and included on Lantmäteriets official map. This is crazy. Please explain!
archie (2025-08-08 13:17:21+00:00): Vad exakt är frågan?
Mappy Carter (2025-08-08 17:26:22+00:00): Frågan är: varför tar du bort mina kartinlägg???
De är ju alla hus som finns på Lantmäteriets officiella karta.
Vem är du att spela kartpolis i hela Sydsverige?