piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2025-03-13 04:30:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was flagged because your added description contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam
pitscheplatsch (2025-03-13 15:32:21+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/163575567
ieguy (2025-03-13 04:35:44+00:00): trying to fix the boundaries that are stuck to roads, sidewalks, grass. it makes it hard to adjust anything without affecting the boundary
nevw (2025-03-13 06:15:15+00:00): This is not the correct way to draw a route in osm and I will revert. You don't redraw another way over the existing mapped roads. 
To create a cycleway route relation you just add the existing road, track, cycleway, footway etc segments that have already been mapped by others along the route to the new cycleway relation you make.
You are likely to need to split the existing ways where the route shifts from a roadway to another way occasionally. 
At times you may need to draw a bit of road or track, etc that hasn't been mapped yet if that is part of the route. You may need to draw a small section to transition from a road to another way where there is no formal way that gets no tags but is added to your route because it is a desired way and so there are no gaps in the route. 
I don't use iD  and expect Josm would be much easier to create routes.
Here is an example of the local bike route and notice that 21 members (or bits of way) make up the relation.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3836967#map=15/-27.60386/153.13519
nevw (2025-03-13 06:25:38+00:00): If these are personal cycle routes and not official it may be better to add to https://www.wikiloc.com/ or similar.
You can add images and a description, etc.
Here is an example of a hike on Wikiloc https://www.wikiloc.com/hiking-trails/mount-glorious-lepidozamia-road-toward-mt-daguilar-17912069
People can download the gpx
Ukioye (2025-03-13 07:03:36+00:00): Hi NevW,
These are personal bike routes..I select to edit the map whilst on https://www.cyclosm.org/#map=12/-29.0611/153.4060/cyclosm
They immediately redirect to OSM for the input of the route, but cyclosm is all based on personal bike tours - not cycleways per se.
I will look up the links and Josm to learn more, like: how to select River Drive only to the intersection at Wardell, how to add an underpass at Wardell Bridge (the cursor goes to a red circle with diagonal slash indicating no go)
Thanks for the directions. (Nice pun eh?)
Ukioye
nevw (2025-03-13 07:50:30+00:00): I am not familiar with CyclOSM but it takes you to OSM to edit the map so you would need to be familiar with the way it's done in OSM.
The are Australian guidelines for our route networks.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Cycling_and_Foot_Paths#Route_Networks
You are welcome to discuss this with other members of the OSM community at https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/oceania/73
Looks like someone started a discussion about local cycle routes in Dec 2024 so that may be of interest 
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/lcn-tagging-in-australia/123529/2
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-05 02:42:36+00:00): DWG revert - poor mapping & non response

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164533875
selillium (2025-03-13 07:14:41+00:00): I forgot to include in the source tag that I have verified these tag upgrades by survey for all applicable parking tag changeset upgrades made just prior.
monhiko (2025-03-13 06:28:09+00:00): 桂林是郑州下辖的一个地级市（大雾）
meongseolin (2025-03-17 05:13:16+00:00): 抱歉啊，我选总结时选错了
Glassman (2025-03-13 22:07:02+00:00): Besides the name, a tag describing the business is also needed. I'll send you info on OSM with a link to our wiki that should help you figure out what the appropriate tag would be.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163554834
Glassman (2025-03-13 22:11:47+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

I reverted this edit because of the number of errors. A building was poorly drawn, the node of a restaurant was move to the road. And you changed the name of a section of Makah Passage.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163554985
Glassman (2025-03-13 22:12:34+00:00): Please add a tag to describe the business type.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163555041
Glassman (2025-03-13 22:23:18+00:00): #TIP: square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163555114
Glassman (2025-03-13 22:20:59+00:00): #TIP: square the buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163555126
Glassman (2025-03-13 22:23:53+00:00): Another bldg that needs to be squared.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163555145
Glassman (2025-03-13 22:24:27+00:00): One looks square, the other doesn't
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163555162
Glassman (2025-03-13 22:21:24+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163555196
Glassman (2025-03-13 22:21:43+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163555404
Glassman (2025-03-13 22:22:07+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163555442
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-05 05:28:07+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164536171
Glassman (2025-03-13 22:25:53+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163555616
aharvey (2025-03-14 04:40:43+00:00): hi I think it's good to remove the lane since there's no separated way, however the bus stop node needs highway=bus_stop per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=bus_stop plus the other tags for public transport https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/node/1817076180
Glassman (2025-03-13 22:27:03+00:00): Check out how opening_hours should be tag https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163556238
aixbrick (2025-03-13 07:01:58+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OSM,
du gibst bei allen Hydranten als "ref" den Wert "80" an. "ref" wird für die Schlüsselnummer des Hydranten verwendet, also einen eindeutigen Bezeichner. Ich glaube nicht, dass alle Hydranten dieselbe Nummer haben. Meinst du evtl. "fire_hydrant:diameter"?
Als Quelle gibst du "Gemeinde Niederzier" an. Gibt es seitens der Gemeinde eine explizite Freigabe zur Nutzung für OSM?
Falls du im Auftrag mappst, solltest du das im Profil kenntlich machen.
Gruß
SimonFeuerwehr (2025-03-13 09:24:54+00:00): Hallo , ja genau da wir nicht sichersind welche durchmesser der richrige ist, haben wir von Feuerwehr dazu entschlossen den duchschnitt zu nehmen , daher geben wir alle mit dem Duchmesser 80 anzgeben.

Genau meine quelle ist die Gemeinde Niederzier. Ich Arbeite auch als Verwaltunsgangestellter in der Gemeinde Niederzier und bin für den Brandschutz mit beauftragt.
Ich werde mein Profil gleich umstellen .

Wir haben nmoch ca. 1000 Hydranten einzupflegen.

Grüße

Falls dann mehr herauskommt
SimonFeuerwehr (2025-03-13 09:27:33+00:00): Ich gabe sie deshalb als Rev mit 80 an da wir dann in dem Program gleich sehen um welche göße es sie handelt
SimonFeuerwehr (2025-03-13 09:45:23+00:00): Ich werde bei den bis her Eingepflegten diese noch mal abäöndern nach Rückspache mit den Bauamt habe ich auch jetzt alle nummern . In zukunft wird es besser laufen :-)
aixbrick (2025-03-13 12:04:11+00:00): Das sieht in den neueren Changesets jetzt deutlich besser aus. Danke.
Noch eine Anmerkung: Achte darauf, dass du die Nodes nach Möglichkeit nicht mit Wegen (Flächen, Straßen...) verbindest. Gerade bei Flächen kann es sonst vorkommen, dass bei einer Änderung der Hydrant unbeabsichtigt ganz woanders hin verschoben wird. Bei Straßen ist das Risiko zwar geringer, aber auch gegeben. Beispiel: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163565097. Hier wurde der Hydrant https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12658348237/ auf die Linien der landuse-Flächen plaziert und ist nun Teil davon.
SimonFeuerwehr (2025-03-13 13:42:23+00:00): Alles kalr danke für die info. werde drauf achten .
HirschKauz (2026-04-06 09:03:37+00:00): Mir sind die vielen ref=80 bei den Hydranten aufgefallen und gesehen, dass alle regional sind und vom selbem (neuen und seit 1 Jahr  nicht mehr aktiven) Mapper eingepflegt wurden. 
Habe dann alle ref=80 in fire_hydrant:diameter=80 geändert (Changeset:180931661) und leider danach erst diesen CS-Kommentar gefunden.

- @Simon: statt einer (falschen) ref=80 als 'Memo' im Sinn von 'dann ist erstmal was drin', nutzen wir das tag fixme=* und sorgen dann im Prinzip selbst dafür, dies zeitnah zu korrigieren :-)  
Schade, dass Dein Projekt wohl im Sande verlaufen ist, aber vielleicht hast Du jetzt bei besserem Wetter wieder Zeit und Muse :-)
Grüße aus Hoven

PS, den verklebten node:12658348237 habe ich auch 'befreit'
SimonFeuerwehr (2026-04-06 17:32:50+00:00): Hallo vielen Dank für dein Feedback.
Nein es ist nicht im sande Verlaufen .
Es ist halt einfach aktuell leider bei uns noch wichtigere Sachen zu erledigen .
Wir haben das aber auf dem Schirm fürs 2 Quartal .
Wir werden versuchen , dann die letzten ein zu pflegen .
Vielen Dank für deine Mühe .
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
rempshaener (2026-04-06 18:35:38+00:00): Ich rate zum Löschen der Nennweiten. In dieser Form ("Durchschnitt") haben sie nichts in OSM zu suchen.
Ein weiterer Hinweis:
Hydranten sollten nicht mit Straßen, Gebäuden u. ä. verbunden werden. Das lässt sich leicht beheben: im Editor markieren und „E“ drücken – das löst den Hydranten von der Linie. 
Das betrifft bei den Straßen diese Objekte: https://overpass-turbo.eu/?Q=%5Bout%3Ajson%5D%5Btimeout%3A3000%5D%3B%0Aarea%5Bname%3D%22Niederzier%22%5D%3B%0Away%5Bhighway%5D%28area%29%20-%3E%20.highways%3B%0Anode%5B%22emergency%22%3D%22fire_hydrant%22%5D%28w.highways%29%28user_touched%3ASimonFeuerwehr%29%3B%0A%28._%3B%3E%3B%29%3B%0Aout%3B&C=50.877098%3B6.452322%3B13&R=
Viele Grüße
HirschKauz (2026-04-17 11:25:36+00:00): @rempshaener: Die overpass-Abfrage ist gut. Leider sind einige  Hydranten nicht neu, sondern auf bestehenen nodes gemappt worden... Magst Du mir die Abfrage ergänzen mit "Bearbeitungsversion 1"? (ich bin nicht so gut in overpass). Die übrigen mache ich dann hinterher.
Danke im Voraus
rempshaener (2026-04-17 17:37:50+00:00): @HirschKauz: In der Version 1? Das wäre dann https://overpass-turbo.eu/?Q=%5Bout%3Ajson%5D%5Btimeout%3A3000%5D%3B%0Aarea%5Bname%3D%22Niederzier%22%5D%3B%0Away%5Bhighway%5D%28area%29%20-%3E%20.highways%3B%0Anode%5B%22emergency%22%3D%22fire_hydrant%22%5D%28w.highways%29%28user_touched%3ASimonFeuerwehr%29%28if%3Aversion%28%29%3D%3D1%29%3B%0A%28._%3B%3E%3B%29%3B%0Aout%3B&C=50.873361%3B6.468859%3B13
HirschKauz (2026-04-18 09:35:57+00:00): Danke! man lernt täglich dazu :-) 
Die Hydranten aus der overpass sind nun alle von den Wegen entklebt. 
Man könnte gleich weitermachen wenn man den user aus der Abfrage entfernt... :-/ 

@Simon: Wenn noch Fragen oder Zweifel sind.... kennst Du schon das deutschsprachige Forum? 
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/de/56 

VG @alle
Glassman (2025-03-13 22:33:27+00:00): Not sure why you removed the coffee shop you just added but left the tag amenity=cafe.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163556341
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-05 05:28:08+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164536171
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-07 06:38:48+00:00): DWG revert - poor quality mapping

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164618287
Taya_S (2025-03-13 09:23:06+00:00): Reverted SEO vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163561161
Glassman (2025-03-13 22:37:40+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

You added a building where one already existed. Also, there appear to be multiple tags of the same business. 

When multiple businesses operate out of the same building, just add a node for each of the business.

Can you fix this? Let me know if you need help. I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163556950
aharvey (2025-03-14 03:32:33+00:00): hi you've left some URLs in https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12658008910 and other nodes
aharvey (2025-03-14 03:30:17+00:00): As far as I can tell https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1360049806 was not duplicated, any reason for the deletion?
NeisReview (2025-03-21 07:17:20+00:00): #UnexplainedChanges

Hello, welcome to OSM.

Could you please clarify the purpose behind your map changes? It's not entirely clear from the edited data and your added description. Also, what was used as a source of your activity?

Looking forward to your response. 
Thank you.
mrpulley (2025-12-31 23:31:11+00:00): Reverted at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176688857. Please do not add 'test' edits to the OSM database.
nekocake kitsu (2025-03-13 10:13:19+00:00): this changeset seems to span a long range

this can make it harder for other contributors to maintain and modify.

next time try to release your changesets separately when editing long range. 

thank you for your understanding and happy mapping!
ivanbranco (2025-03-13 11:26:31+00:00): > this can make it harder for other contributors to maintain and modify.

Uhm, not really? They just added "driving_side=right" to the Cambogia, Laos, Russia, North Korea, South Korea and British Indian Ocean Territory. I guess touching the Russia relation would create a big bbox alone.
bxl-forever (2025-03-13 13:37:24+00:00): Not really: here is what changeset that only changes Russia looks like: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161301284

Sure, it is also a huge bounding box but still significantly smaller than this one, going beyond latitude –7 (mostly because of the British Indian Ocean Territory).
nekocake kitsu (2025-03-13 17:48:04+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/What%27s_the_problem_with_mechanical_edits%3F#Large_changesets
nekocake kitsu (2025-03-13 17:52:30+00:00): this wiki page clearly states how this can cause confused and make it harder to maintain

please next time check the wiki before trying to come up with a conclusion

you could have easily searched the wiki page for "Large changesets" rather than doing this
ivanbranco (2025-03-13 18:07:12+00:00): I know the wiki, and usually the linked page is rather https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets (this edit is not a mechanical one). But they literally added one tag to six relations. Nothing difficult to "mantain" (whatever that means in thix context) or modify, that's what I was commenting about. It would be different if they modified thousand of boundary nodes or something else, but this is not the case. The changeset comment is quite descriptive and is easy to understand what they did. I'm also annoyed by big changeset popping up in my RSS feed, I just don't get this fever to comment every one of them.

happy mapping
nekocake kitsu (2025-03-13 18:15:22+00:00): thanks for sending the correct link :D

I meant "maintain" in a more broad perspective, if the user does the same thing but with more nodes then this could cause problems with maintainability

thank you and happy mapping!
aharvey (2025-03-14 04:34:08+00:00): looks good
ahirek (2025-03-14 11:15:31+00:00): I'm really enjoying mapping in this area! This challenge highlights several locations where water overlaps with buildings, and it's great to help improve OSM data by fixing them. Excited to contribute!
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-05 05:28:09+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164536171
NeisBot (2025-03-13 08:15:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was flagged because your added description contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2025-03-13 14:53:21+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/163574051
NeisBot (2025-03-13 08:27:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was flagged because your added description contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment
NeisReview (2025-03-21 19:33:47+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/163921871
Littlebtc (2025-03-13 08:29:21+00:00): 更正敘述：「埔里周邊繪製」
NeisBot (2025-03-13 09:06:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was flagged because your added description contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2025-03-13 14:43:27+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/163573684
TinPetreković (2025-03-18 06:41:40+00:00): Reverting because there was no basis for tagging the easternmost segment #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163759890
Syl (2025-03-13 09:59:48+00:00): Bonjour, merci pour cet ajout, je viens de corriger son type comme ce n'est visiblement pas un hôpital.
Frans S (2025-03-17 15:03:33+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
You did not tag the crossings  highway/waterway, Mostly a ford.
Be sure you connected both waterway and highway when adding a crossing tag.
Best regards
Arnold Nkwabong (2025-03-17 17:17:46+00:00): Ohh i saw, don't know what happened.
Thanks for feedback, i am going to fix them now !
Frans S (2025-03-17 17:42:02+00:00): Hi. Issues are solved. I mapped and tagged them
Best regards
dypa (2025-03-21 18:17:45+00:00): При указании размеченных не регулируемых пешеходных переходов нельзя использовать тег crossing=zebra, см https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:crossing=zebra

Пожалуйста при внесении следующих правок используйте теги (Размеченный (нерегулируемый) пешеходный переход)
crossing=uncontrolled
crossing:markings=zebra

Заранее спасибо!
Frans S (2025-03-20 11:52:12+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please read the definition for highway=service in the highway wiki.
You changed a correct tagged road (residential) into service.
I corrected them
Best regards
Lezurex (2025-03-13 15:10:49+00:00): Hallo Fabian,

Bis nach Kloten ist dies tatsächlich die A11, ab Kloten wird sie zur A51 als kantonale Autobahn. Auch wenn die Richtungsschilder in Zürich-Nord bereits die A51 kennzeichnen, die Kilometerschilder entlang der Autobahn kennzeichnen die A11.

https://map.geo.admin.ch/#/map?lang=de&center=2685449.67,1256401.5&z=9.349&topic=ech&layers=ch.astra.nationalstrassenachsen&bgLayer=ch.swisstopo.pixelkarte-farbe&featureInfo=default

Kann ich das rückgängig machen?

LG Lezurex
Lezurex (2025-03-24 13:13:17+00:00): Keine Rückmeldung erhalten, drum: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164032077
StC (2025-03-13 13:02:50+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre qui passe par là, en ajoutant des chemins dans la relation parente au lieu de les ajouter dans la sous-relation concernée. Etes-vous en mesure de faire la correction ?
Patr1k_P (2025-03-20 08:24:18+00:00): park treba znacit ako plochu nie ako bod
dmajcin (2025-03-20 09:08:23+00:00): I stalo sa. Zdravím.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-08-08 15:37:08+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/184714301/history has maxspeed:source = FR:urban that was added in this edit
is maxspeed:source intentionally used instead of source:maxspeed ? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source:maxspeed

maxspeed:type is also sometimes used as a key for such data, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxspeed:type
Langlaeufer (2025-03-31 17:43:38+00:00): Hallo JSp1152,

ich hab mir erlaubt das zu korrigieren.
1) Lage mit Luftbild an die korrekte Position gebracht 2) Überflüssiges access-tagging entfernt, 3 ) name ist nur Name name->description 4) Endpunkt lag nicht auf Straßenachse.
Grüße Langläufer
Langlaeufer (2025-03-31 17:44:35+00:00): 5) Tagging der Straßenachse cycleway:both=separate
JSp1152 (2025-04-03 09:59:09+00:00): Hallo Langläufer,
perfekt, gemeinsam wird OSM immer besser.
Langlaeufer (2025-04-03 10:57:33+00:00): 👍
Tomas Straupis (2025-03-13 11:09:23+00:00): Ten jau yra pažymėti vartai. Bet dėl to viduje esantis pravažiavimas netampa nepravažiavimu. Atšaukiau pakeitimą.
Andrej Iljin (2025-03-13 16:31:05+00:00): Sveiki. Kieme tarp 7 ir 5 namo pastatyta tvora su vartais, kur nei pestieji nei mašinos negail pravažiuoti. Ta tvora nėra pažymeta
Tomas Straupis (2025-03-13 16:45:26+00:00): Vartai yra pažymėti, jei pro juos neina niekam praeiti/pravažiuoti, tai vartams reikia pridėti atitinkamas žymas. Bet pats kelias kaipo toks ten yra.
aharvey (2025-03-14 03:02:42+00:00): hi the Esri World Imagery has bad resolution here, so please don't change building geometries which are very accurately mapped from high resolution DCS NSW Imagery to match worse resolution imagery.

Due to this I've reverted this changeset.
08kiran95 (2025-03-19 11:05:01+00:00): Hi aharvey,

Thanks for your quick check and reverting edits here—I really appreciate it! 

I just wanted to clarify something out of curiosity. Based on my understanding, water from the river shouldn't overlap or intersect with houses that are situated along its banks. Could you help confirm if the water polygon is correctly intersecting the building polygon? If there’s a reason for the overlap or if I might be missing some context, I’d love to understand more.

Looking forward to your thoughts!
aharvey (2025-03-19 23:17:14+00:00): If the house is built on piers it may have been built over the water, it could be always over the water even at low tide, or only during hide tide, but either way it's expected that the two polygons could overlap.