piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
literan (2025-03-18 19:32:53+00:00): могу лишь предложить вам почитать правила:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#%D0%98%D0%BC%D1%8F_%E2%80%93_%D1%8D%D1%82%D0%BE_%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%B8_%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%BA%D0%BE

есть масса объектов, не имеющих названий (деревья, тропы, заборы, дома и т.п.). Требуйте от программистов того, в чем вы получаете результаты поиска, чтобы они исправляли столь очевидные ошибки.
iSphinx (2025-03-18 19:53:52+00:00): Спасибо за информацию.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-03-17 20:15:00+00:00): Reverted to add
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:destroyed:*

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163748936
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-03-17 20:20:37+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163749047
map per (2025-03-17 13:24:27+00:00): Hello ssssssl,

I reverted this and and all your previous edits.

Please don't upload your private Maps.me bookmarks to the public OpenStreetMap database.

Thanks and best regards
map per
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2025-03-18 00:58:23+00:00): Ankara-Kırıkkale arasındaki otoyolun inşasına yeni başlandı. Neden hemen D200 yolundaki int_ref(E-88) etiketlerini siliyorsunuz? E-88'i bozuyorsunuz.

Lütfen şu kurala uyunuz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Map_what's_on_the_ground

Otoyolun daha inşasına bile yeni başlandığını göz önünde bulundurunuz.

---

Construction of the highway between Ankara and Kırıkkale has just started. Why are you immediately deleting the int_ref(E-88) tags in the D200 path? You are breaking E-88.

Please follow this rule: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Map_what's_on_the_ground

Consider that the construction of the highway has only just begun.
gscholz (2025-03-18 06:56:07+00:00): Hi steblas,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=11.63790&lat=44.83202&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=163702583

As you may know, this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps. Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
NeisReview (2025-03-17 06:58:10+00:00): #DataImport #NameCheck

Hi, welcome to OSM!

With this and your latest changesets, you've added a significant number of features that appear to share similarities in their tags. Could you please let us know more about the source of your mapping activity? Is this a data import?

Looking forward to hearing from you.

Thanks!
NeisReview (2025-03-28 20:23:48+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164014450
Frans S (2025-03-17 13:19:06+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping. 
You overlooked some water/highway crossings, which should be tagged as a Ford in most cases.
The Issue triangle warns you about that.
Where a waterway runs parallel to a highway, please don't let it cross .
Best regards
LucRodgers (2025-03-17 15:05:15+00:00): Thanks, Frans.  I appreciate the feedback. I hadn't seen Ford referenced in the instructions but I will be sure to plot them going forward. Please let me know if you see anything else needing improvement. 
Luc
Frans S (2025-03-17 17:08:00+00:00): Hi. Connecting crossings and many other mappings stuff are to be consideraties as common knowledge and practice and will not be specified  in instructies
Best regards
NeisReview (2025-03-17 06:30:31+00:00): #NameCheck

Hello and welcome to OSM.

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits, particularly those concerning the names you've added or modified.

Some of these names caught my attention as they are quite unique or a bit unusual. Could you please confirm if these additions were intentional or if they might have been added mistakenly?

Looking forward to your response.

Thank you!
NeisRevert (2025-03-21 20:42:01+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163704839
Kris74M (2025-10-08 15:38:16+00:00): Cześć. 
Myślę, że nr ref w przypadku tej linii 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18828476/history#map=10/51.3576/18.7262&layers=T
jest niepotrzebny.
Kris74M (2025-10-08 15:49:20+00:00): I źle zaznaczone są przystanki w Wieluniu. Jak uda mi się wczytać relatify, to poprawie.
NeisReview (2025-03-17 06:47:50+00:00): #NameChanges

Hi, welcome to OSM.

In the past 12 hours, you have made numerous name changes across various changesets. This included modifying names as well as modifying and/or removing other name:*.

Are these changes being made in coordination with the local community? Additionally, could you share more information about your sources?

I would appreciate a response.

Thank you.

You can find an overview of the recent changesets at the following link: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?uid=22634399
user_21736114 (2025-07-13 16:47:05+00:00): This edit contains some flaws, I have fixed them
Andrea Musuruane (2025-03-17 09:39:02+00:00): Ciao. Il numero civico corretto è 19b. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163705291
Comino (2025-03-17 09:49:56+00:00): OK, please make the same edit on Facebook.
Andrea Musuruane (2025-03-17 09:54:06+00:00): Tell who handle the facebook page and please do not copy data from other sources in OSM. BR, Andrea
eggie (2025-03-16 21:20:47+00:00): Dag Davy.. Je info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode.
MVG
eggie
DavyLandman (2025-03-17 07:29:41+00:00): Ah, right, zal ik volgende keer op letten
StC (2025-03-17 09:18:42+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre qui passe par là. Je m'occupe de la réparation.
ExoticApple57 (2025-03-17 22:11:11+00:00): Merci, désolé je n'avais pas vu ce souci !
eggie (2025-03-17 07:40:51+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
NeisReview (2025-03-17 06:49:56+00:00): #DataImport #NameCheck

Hi, welcome to OSM!

With this and your latest changesets, you've added a significant number of features that appear to share similarities in their tags. Could you please let us know more about the source of your mapping activity? Is this a data import?

Looking forward to hearing from you.

Thanks!
NieWnen (2025-03-17 01:07:56+00:00): Czy w terenie zatoczki autobusowe zyskały separatory względem głównej drogi?

Niezależnie od powyższego, ta zmiana jest błędna, bo rozwaliła wszystkie relacje autobusowe powiązane z tymi przystankami.
SzymonH (2025-03-17 08:17:19+00:00): Byłem tam w piątek i nic się nie zmieniło względem np. zdjęć z Binga
NeisReview (2025-03-17 06:50:33+00:00): #DataImport #NameCheck

Hi, welcome to OSM!

With this and your latest changesets, you've added a significant number of features that appear to share similarities in their tags. Could you please let us know more about the source of your mapping activity? Is this a data import?

Looking forward to hearing from you.

Thanks!
IvanBabić (2025-03-18 15:19:15+00:00): I reverted it because a node was made #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163779898
felipeeugenio (2025-04-14 16:43:12+00:00): Marcelo. por favor consulta como hacer estas ediciones. llevo harto rato corrigiendo. Dejaste todo superpuesto con tags equivocados.
Las villas es mejor dejarlas como un nodo.

saludos
b-jazz (2025-03-26 16:21:31+00:00): I don't believe a route relation is appropriate here. Those are more typically used for things like bus routes or scenic routes. Not just a collection of similarly named roads.
S Plaid Mapper (2025-03-27 19:35:06+00:00): If you live in the area, you would know deliveries and GPS get messed up because the plot of LAND which I have identified is not in fact a paved road. But the houses surrounding that strip of grass do have Virginia Pine Way as their address. All GPS tries to take you down a grass field without understanding that the “unknown road” actually connects to the homes on Virginia Pine Way. The grassy area was supposed to be a paved road and the developers changed their mind. My edits are correct.
S Plaid Mapper (2025-03-27 19:37:02+00:00): Grassy strip is the courtyard if that was not clear.
b-jazz (2025-03-28 00:38:23+00:00): I'm sure you feel your edits are correct, but as someone that is very new to OSM, and even seasoned people don't fully understand relations and routes and what not, I can say with confidence that you are likely not using ROUTES in the proper manner. I'm not saying that the block around those three buildings and the grass area shouldn't be named roads. I'm saying you shouldn't have created the route relation(s). If you still think what you've done is right, show me how by quoting passages from the wiki. Thanks.
S Plaid Mapper (2025-03-28 01:10:10+00:00): Ah, I follow you now. Can you help me resolve this situation? I am trying to correct the GPS navigation in my vehicles from directing me to loop all the way around to the top of Branched Oak Rd to then turn onto the very SMALL sliver that was “officially” labeled Virginia Pine Way, but leads right into a grassy courtyard that was supposed to be a paved part of the original street plans and never came to fruition. This has left delivery drivers and other visitors very confused as well.
b-jazz (2025-03-29 23:21:32+00:00): First you would need to find out what map provider is used by your vehicle for navigation. Is this something built into your car or are you just talking about a navigation app on your phone?

I see you are adding a bunch of addresses to the building, which isn't the best way to go. I'm not aware of routing software that looks for housenumber1..N. I've added a few address points that would be the "more correct" way to map multiple units in a building.

You should also be aware that there can be a huge lag time (weeks) between when you make a change to a map and when that actually shows up on navigation apps.

I feel your pain. I've dealt with housing complexes that had unnecessarily complex routing  issues.
S Plaid Mapper (2025-03-30 23:21:50+00:00): I researched on my car forum and they said either Google maps and/or this place. But, it’s starting to sound like too complicated. I will just have to deal with it telling me to drive onto a grassy strip where kids are playing. LOL. Also, it’s always fun having to go to the neighbors on Branched Oak to retrieve our packages at random times.
NeisBot (2025-03-16 21:27:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was flagged because your added description contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2025-03-21 19:47:55+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/163922310
vasony (2025-03-18 21:07:19+00:00): Do not blindly capitalize house number letters in Hungary. The capitalization depends on the settlement. 
57/a is the official format in Budapest.
eustace8 (2025-03-19 10:22:26+00:00): All right, where can I find what the official format is?
eustace8 (2025-03-19 10:44:55+00:00): +tip: Could you use friendlier phrases, like words "please" or "could you"? Moreover "blindly" is not polite either, you don't know why I changed the capitalization and you did not even care. If you are not friendly, that will discourage people from contributing.
vasony (2025-03-19 20:34:58+00:00): Sorry for my style. Your edits seemed like an armchair mapping of a well surveyed area. 

Unfortunately there are no global list for that, depends on the settlement. The local community has started to collect the local decrees on a wiki page, but it is only in Hungarian:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hungary/Utcanevek,_h%C3%A1zsz%C3%A1mok#H%C3%A1zsz%C3%A1mok_%C3%A9s_al%C3%A1t%C3%B6r%C3%A9sek

+tip: Please use the source tag to clarify your source of your edits.
eustace8 (2025-03-21 08:24:29+00:00): I see, thank you for your help, the work you are doing is admirable.
Jordi MF_import (2025-03-16 22:10:48+00:00): Hola Deibitebo97,

Gràcies per millorar la base de dades d'OSM, però podries informar de la font de dades amb la qual t'has basat per a modificar els noms? Espere que no et dolga perquè el coneixement local és valuós, però voldria fer un aclariment sobre la toponímia.

Tenint en compte que per llei, l'Acadèmia Valenciana de la Llengua és l'encarregada de normalitzar la toponímia, seguim la toponímia oficial que esta institució publica en el seu Nomenclàtor. Així, segons l'AVL, el nom normalitzat i oficial d'alguns topònims que has modificat són:
- Pla d'Almiserà i Carretera d'Almiserà: https://visor.gva.es/visor/?extension=745938,4301248,747348,4301907&nivelZoom=17&capasids=Topografico;,0103_NTV;&tcapas=1.0,1.0

- els Penyals: https://visor.gva.es/visor/?extension=744339,4298514,745750,4299173&nivelZoom=17&capasids=Topografico;,0103_NTV;&tcapas=1.0,1.0

- "Camí del Castell" i no "Camí de Tarrenyes" (https://visor.gva.es/visor/?extension=745698,4298174,747108,4298834&nivelZoom=17&capasids=Topografico;,0103_NTV;&tcapas=1.0,1.0). En este cas, pareix que comparteixen el tram i que, per tant, es poden mantindre els dos noms afegint l'etiqueta "alt_name" o official_name=* per a qualsevol d'ells. En est cas, si vols, podem recuperar el nom "official_name=Camí del Castell" i mantindre el de Camí de Tarrenyes si este últim és més utiltizat.

- les Heretats i no "els Heretats" (al cap i a la fi, la paraula "heretat" és femenina): https://visor.gva.es/visor/?extension=746431,4299375,747135,4299703&nivelZoom=18&capasids=Topografico;,0103_NTV;&tcapas=1.0,1.0

Si algun dels noms que has utlitzat per als topònims és utilitzat pe algun veí, existeix l'etiqueta "loc_name" per a poder-lo afegir a la base de dades. Si algun dels topònims apareix en un cartell a peu de carrer, podríem traslladar el topònim oficial i normalitzat de l'AVL a l'etiqueta "official_name=*".

Aquesta manera d'editar es basa en acords de la comunitat publicats en la wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ca:Comunitat_Valenciana#Altres_top%C3%B2nims

Estem en contacte. Salutacions i gràcies.
ForestFurnace (2025-03-22 00:43:26+00:00): Hello, I noticed a warning from your removal of bicycle=designated for the Mercedes Cotner paths that were previously tagged as Cycle & Foot Paths. Should these be changed to Foot Paths instead, maybe with a bicycle=dismount section leading from the parking lot to the pump track? I couldn't find any information about whether bicycles were permitted or prohibited when I added the paths a while ago.
Thank you.
pkoby (2025-03-22 02:15:37+00:00): Hello, I removed bicycle=designated because the paths are tagged with highway=cycleway, which as the wiki says, "implies bicycle=designated" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dcycleway), so it's basically redundant. I'm not sure why iD thinks that's an error.

The way they're tagged now means it's a shared use path, but it could also be tagged with highway=path, foot=designated, bicycle=designated and mean the same thing.

I'm not local to the area, but the county database of bicycle infrastructure labels these as Shared Use Paths, so unless labeled differently on-site, they seem to be for both foot and bike.
martinst (2025-03-17 06:08:06+00:00): Better than a deletion would be to change tags to disused:shop and old_name in order to preserve the history of objects.
techtimo (2025-03-17 13:51:24+00:00): Hi Martin,
OK I didn't know. Will update accordingly. Thanks for notifying 😊
SzymonH (2025-03-18 08:26:34+00:00): Mam zastrzeżenia do okolicy pętli Międzylesie:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/187393988 - jest oznaczona jako oneway=yes, przez co nie ma wyjazdu w lewo z ul. Przedwiośnie, a na orto doskonale widać, że ruch jest dozwolony. W dodatku całe to rozdzielenie Al. Dzieci Polskich jest tylko namalowane na jezdni, wobec czego moim zdaniem nie powinno być rozdzielone na osobne jezdnie.
IreuN (2025-03-18 16:16:47+00:00): Ale ja tam wcale nie dzieliłem drogi na dwie nitki, wiem że jest to niepoprawne. Też nie oznaczyłem tej drogi jako jednokierunkowa, ja tam tylko poprawiłem geometrię i dodałem traffic_calming oraz przejścia dla pieszych oznaczyłem lepiej.
IreuN (2025-03-18 16:18:44+00:00): Usunąłem tą nitkę jednokierunkową, routing powinien być w porządku, jeśli chcesz połączyć rozdzielone nitki to śmiało. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163782475#map=14/52.21987/21.19344
OSM_RogerWilco (2025-03-17 06:22:44+00:00): Moin Craftrix,

die Daten vom Landesamt für Geoinformation und Landesvermessung Niedersachsen sind aufgrund der Lizenz keine zulässige Quelle für OSM. Bitte nutze diese Quelle nicht. Es läuft aber aktuell eine Anfrage beim LGLN, ob Daten für OSM freigegeben werden können.

Ich mache Deine Änderung daher wieder rückgängig. Sorry!

Viele Grüße
Roger Wilco
OSM_RogerWilco (2025-03-17 06:26:00+00:00): Und bitte POI Nodes nicht löschen. Die Erfassung als separater Node ist grundsätzlich immer möglich und hat Vorteile gegenüber der Erfassung der POI-Daten am Gebäude.
OSM_RogerWilco (2025-03-17 06:27:17+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163716744
flex16 (2025-03-17 16:32:29+00:00): Lass mir dir noch einen kleinen Hinweis geben: Die Adressen an den Amenitys/Shops/Offices können ruhig bleiben. Es sollen nur nicht mehrere Gebäude oder ein Gebäude und dazu noch eine reine Adressnode die gleiche Hausnummer haben. Also Hausnummer an Gebäude und Amenity ist ok, wenn du verstehst wie ich das meine. Ansonsten machst du alles gut.
Einen guten Start in die Woche wünscht
Flex16
flex16 (2025-03-17 16:39:39+00:00): P.S.: Hab wenige Kleinigkeiten in Alsfeld korrigiert.
matze089 (2025-03-17 21:51:26+00:00): OK. Dann habe ich falsch gedacht. Danke.
eggie (2025-03-17 07:41:44+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
onovy (2025-04-01 18:39:48+00:00): Ahoj,

transformator na sloupu el. vedeni se znaci jako
power=pole
transformer=distribution

viz. dokumentace:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Elektrick%C3%A1_veden%C3%AD

Děkuji.
Jiří Komárek (2025-04-02 08:58:27+00:00): Ahoj,
díky za info. Zkusím na to myslet příště, i když je pravda, že zrovna elektrické vedení moc nedělám: takže to příště taky může být za rok, dva, ... Tak doufám, že mi to v hlavě do té doby zůstane :-D

Díky,
Jirka
onovy (2025-04-02 09:35:24+00:00): Díky :)
NeisReview (2025-03-17 06:56:15+00:00): #HighwayChanges

Hello, welcome to OSM.

In this changeset, some types of highway are being added or modified by you. 

Could we know the sources that you used? Thank you.
Rik68mi (2025-03-17 07:28:48+00:00): L'ho scritto, ci vivo e lo sanno tutti. Ci sono i cartelli ed è così da sempre, la cerchia dei navigli si fa in preferenziale in senso orario da Fatebenefratelli angolo Porta Nuova a Largo Paolo D'Ancona
NeisReview (2025-03-28 20:23:05+00:00): Grazie per l'informazione
Busaiolis (2025-07-18 14:02:36+00:00): Ciao, come mai hai aggiunto il tag motor_vehicle=designated sulla preferenziale? L'accesso per bus e taxi non dovrebbe essere già implicato da psv=designated?
Rik68mi (2025-07-18 14:40:05+00:00): Non mi accetta il profilo taxi
Busaiolis (2025-07-18 14:57:38+00:00): Grazie per aver risposto rapidamente, però non mi è ben chiaro cosa intendi. Dove non è accettato il profilo taxi? Come mai taxi=designated non basta?
motor_vehicle=designated lascia pensare che tutti gli autoveicoli possano circolare sulla preferenziale.
Rik68mi (2025-07-18 16:33:12+00:00): Non lo so, tante strada avendo creato un profilo taxi non fa tante vie o sono sbagliate nel navigare (es. via Meravigli verso Duomo).
Busaiolis (2025-09-10 11:36:03+00:00): Non so a cosa sia dovuto questo problema, teoricamente psv dovrebbe consentire l'accesso anche ai taxi. Cosa intendi con profilo taxi, dove lo hai creato?
Rik68mi (2025-09-10 12:44:37+00:00): Un'aggiunta nel file xml mi pare che ceea un profilo che permette di accere con l'auto pubblica nelle corsie preferenziali, ma non l'ho creato io.
Busaiolis (2025-09-10 13:47:18+00:00): Allora il problema è probabilmente nel modo in cui è configurato il routing, e non nella mappa in sé: il tag psv=designated dovrebbe permettere anche i taxi. Per caso il problema si presenta anche quando c'è il tag taxi=yes o designated?
Rik68mi (2025-09-10 15:36:34+00:00): Sì,  poi sono mappate male anche varie strade purtroppo; ci si mettono anche i lavori della MM4.
whb (2025-08-16 12:04:35+00:00): Guten Tag,

zwei versehentliche Verschiebungen rückgängig gemacht:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170520029

Viele Grüße
whb
cronoser (2025-03-19 18:09:08+00:00): Hola;
He quitado los nodos Peña Prieta y Valnera ya que estaban añadidos anteriormente y por tanto duplicados.
- Valnera: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12670875329#map=19/43.145847/-3.681899
- Peña Prieta: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12670875330
Un saludo
Oscar
os-emmer (2025-04-03 14:08:53+00:00): (English version below)

Hola Stu,
has añadido 4 estaciones de emergencia=respuesta en caso de catástrofe una al lado de la otra, mira aquí:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1368189808
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1365889346
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1368189809
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1368189810

¿Estas 4 estaciones están realmente tan cerca unas de otras o se trata de una gran estación formada por varios edificios?

Hello Stu,
you added 4 emergency=disaster_response stations right next to each other, see here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1368189808
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1365889346
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1368189809
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1368189810

Are these realy 4 stations so close to each other or is it one big station consisting of multiple buidlings?
os-emmer (2025-05-11 19:20:57+00:00): I just mearged the 4 emergency=disaster_response into a single node:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166123372
i5IoXTZhmQ61ragH (2025-03-21 21:20:40+00:00): Звичайно, лише громадський транспорт не визначає. Однак, громадський транспорт є вагомим аргументом у сторону статусу третинної дороги.

У Мінському масиві є дуже важливий нежитловий об'єкт — Київська міська клінічна лікарня №8, і важливий нежитловий об'єкт — торгівельний центр "Полярний", що значно підвищують інтенсивність немісцевого трафіку. Дороги у Мінському масиві мають необхідну інфраструктуру: тротуари, дорожню розмітку, світлофори; також
здебільшого присутня ширина в одному напрямку у дві смуги: звуження спостерігається лише на сегменті Литовського проспекту та вулиці Юрія Кондратюка. 
Вкупі ці характеристики явно схиляють статус до третинної.

Статус Перемишльської та Западинської вулиць був підвищений тому, що дорога має необхідну інфраструктуру: тротуари, знак головної дороги при перетині з іншими дорогами, світлофор на перехресті з Вишгородською вулицею, яка має вищий статус. По дорозі їздить громадський транспорт. Вкупі ці характеристики явно схиляють статус до третинної.
KKS (2025-03-31 22:50:39+00:00): Повторюсь ще раз. Наявність ГТ - НЕ визначає статус дороги.

А30 заїзжає до лісового санаторію, це не робить місцеву дорогу третинною!
tordans (2025-03-17 05:12:35+00:00): Hallo Daniel, den Hinweis "Gehört zu Bibliothek" kannst du mit https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:operator "operator=<NameDesBibliothekObjekt> angeben. VG
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163709078
AlphaNoah (2025-05-16 14:28:32+00:00): The building has been removed. The comment should be resolved.
Alexey Vazhnov (2025-05-17 12:31:37+00:00): @maro21, please write better description of your changes, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments