piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
citrula (2024-10-16 23:02:46+00:00): Also, amenity=university is used to mark the entire university, not a single building - I have changed "The Union" to building=university instead. Let me know if you have any questions
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157983949
BCNorwich (2024-10-17 06:51:10+00:00): Hi, Can you please point to your information that says bicycles and foot are not allowed on the A13?

It's true there is no formal footway, but does not mean you are not to walk there.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2024-10-19 11:27:03+00:00): No response so I've reverted the changes.
Richard Carden (2024-10-17 18:02:39+00:00): Thank you.
ottwiz (2024-10-16 21:40:22+00:00): *Gilmer County
AnnaZanke (2024-10-16 21:46:17+00:00): The comment went automatically from the previous changeset. Should have been "added two parkings in the British Library backyard"
NightCyclist (2025-04-29 18:45:29+00:00): Hi rengoo,

woran kann ich vor Ort erkennen, dass der Zugang zur Eckstraße beschränkt ist? Ich habe da irgendwie Tomaten auf den Augen...

Viele Grüße
NightCyclist
rengoo (2025-04-30 06:33:43+00:00): Hi NightCyclist,

In der Tat kann man das vor Ort kann man das vor Ort gar nicht erkennen. Ich bin Teil der dort ansässigen Wohneigentürmergemeinschaft und weiß daher, dass die Straße der WEG gehört bzw. keine öffentliche Straße ist. Ich hatte auch schon überlegt, da es nicht erkennbar ist, das Attribut wieder zu entfernen, zumal es bei der Navigation stört (durch den Hinweis, dass die Straße zugangsbeschränkt ist). Sollte das Attribut daher wieder entfernt werden? Was meinst du?

Viele Grüße 
Reggio
NightCyclist (2025-04-30 07:18:15+00:00): Hi rengoo,

wenn ich mir die Wiki-Seite (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access) so anschaue, wäre access=permissive vielleicht der passendere Wert. Ganz entfernen ist natürlich auch ok.

Viele Grüße
NightCyclist
rengoo (2025-05-02 08:21:11+00:00): Hallo NightCyclist, danke für den Hinweis. Habe es im gesamten Bereich entsprechend auf permissive umgestellt. Das passt laut Beschreibung am Besten. Viele Grüße und nochmal Danke für den Hinweis!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:14:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:23:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:15:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:16:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
ivanbranco (2025-05-14 11:00:12+00:00): Ciao flick89,

attenzione quando cancelli attività, in questo caso hai cancellato due attività, ma con loro anche i dati sul civico, che ora non risulta più presente nel database di OSM.

Le alternative sono due:
1. cancellare solo i tag riguardanti l'attività, lasciando quelli del civico
2. utilizzare disused:shop/amenity=* oppure shop=vacant, questo permette agli utenti (ad esempio via StreetComplete, che ha una missione dedicata) di verificare di volta in volta se un altra attività ha preso il suo posto, e riciclare il nodo

grazie e buon mapping
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:17:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
enezeg (2025-03-04 17:01:48+00:00): Bonjour, osmose indique un pb d'attribut surface=Place de la Forge. je peux le corriger ?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:15:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:23:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:13:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:14:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:18:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:14:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
emersonveenstra (2024-10-16 23:01:20+00:00): I've removed the name (again), please do not re-add the name to the house
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:22:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:18:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
AgusQui (2024-10-17 04:06:07+00:00): Este giro está permitido! https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18170794
Corban8 (2024-10-17 13:48:05+00:00): I will make the appropriate corrections. Thank you.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:15:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:12:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
NorthCrab_upload (2024-10-16 22:40:52+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/848022382

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Javierpf (2024-10-21 15:19:56+00:00): Hi and thank you for contributing :-). Your changeset crosses many continents/countries. 
Please for the future retain your changeset smaller (local). Let reviewers and other mappers check your edit more easily. It's impossible (almost) to keep track of the database and changes if changes in huge areas.
So I kindly ask you when you edit, retain your changeset in a particular smaller area -such as countries/provinces/towns- save it first and then move to another area. Examples:
you are adding/modifying 10 objects in 2 distant cities => make 2 changesets, 1 per city.
you are adding/modifying 5 objects in 5 countries => make 5 changesets, 1 per country.
Why? Have a look at this wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
mweper (2024-10-22 16:21:13+00:00): Hi. I understand that this is not a large changeset and that only the country of Argentina is covered with some modifications of the misspelled "opening_hours" tag.

But if it is necessary, although also more cumbersome, next time I will do it by provinces.

Greetings.
AgusQui (2024-10-17 04:08:18+00:00): Me parece que no entiendes para que son las relaciones de restricciones
¿Esto porqué https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18170931?
Corban8 (2024-10-17 13:49:04+00:00): Turn restrictions are to prevent vehicles from making turns. There are a lot of routing softwares that use OSM data to route individuals through cities like Buenos Aires. Turn restrictions are necessary in order to ensure accurate routing. The turn restrictions I have added were based on road paint and some signage. We recently conducted a ground survey of Buenos Aires and the footage should be available on Mapillary soon. Older Mapillary footage shows turns being allowed at some of these intersections but new imagery shows they are not allowed.
rivermont (2024-10-16 22:50:28+00:00): **Globe landcover
silversurfer83 (2024-10-17 18:52:29+00:00): Hi there :)

Pretty nice work you're doing there in Kassel.

One littel thing: Please do not connect highway ways and things like street cabinets to landuse. These things do not connect and glueing stuff like that together makes future adjustments tedious.

cheers
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157985979
domiden (2024-10-18 08:42:21+00:00): OK, thanks for pointing on that issue. I'll keep it in mind. 😅
VLD316 (2024-10-21 19:02:32+00:00): Hi amarylis rodriguez!
I noticed that all the buildings in this changeset contain highway and slipway tags. I'm wondering if you would be willing to revert this changeset or fix all the issues.
Thanks!
-Nick
zuicz (2024-10-17 21:04:01+00:00): schowałeś kościół pod placem :v
suchencjusz (2024-10-17 21:13:29+00:00): Rany boskie faktycznie
OSMCowboy (2024-10-17 20:59:54+00:00): Correction: Source used was ESRI World Imagery.
rempshaener (2024-10-17 10:03:55+00:00): Hallo,
du hast um einen Review deiner Änderungen gebeten, dem Wunsch komme ich sehr gerne nach. Gerade die Erfassung von Wasserentnahmestellen hat noch richtig Potential.
1.	Adressen: Hydranten haben keine Adressen. Zur technischen Abbildung: wenn du der Auffassung bist, dass eine Adresse aus bestimmten Gründen nötig und richtig ist, dann ändere bitte die Anschriften aus dem addr:*-Schema auf das object:*-Schema, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:object:*. Auch geeignet ist das description-Feld. Und inhaltlich: du hast jetzt georeferenzierte Daten, wozu sollten dann noch Daten „aus der alten Welt“ genutzt werden?
Am wichtigsten (und dringendsten) ist jedenfalls, dass die addr:*-Werte zeitnah getilgt werden.
2. Adressdetails: Der Hydrant https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12256513298 hat als Ort „Upen“, das wenige Meter weiter liegende Feuerwehrhaus https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/699120984 aber „Liebenburg“. Ich vermute mal, das „Upen“ müsste in z.B.  object:suburb. Ansonsten siehe Nr. 1.
3. Interessant wäre noch fire_hydrant:position. Das kommt mit der Zeit über Apps wie StreetComplete ohnehin rein, falls man die Daten jedoch selbst vielleicht besitzt, hat man die „Deutungshoheit“.
4. Wasserquelle: Das tube_well in https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10814449323 ist eher unüblich, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Awater_source%3Dtube_well. Für Zwecke der Löschwasserentnahme ist die Information „groundwater“ wichtiger.
5. Die Lagegenauigkeit scheint mir recht gut zu sein. Ein kleiner Ausreißer: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12256518010. Der steht (siehe https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=608435303447777) ca. 25 m weiter.
5. Daten an Überflurhydranten: Es fehlen Angaben zu couplings und vor allem coupling:diameters (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:couplings:diameters, also z.B, A;B;B)
6. Saugstellen Teich: Siehe z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12256513246.
a) Der Punkt liegt in der Mitte des Teichs. Angegeben werden soll der konkrete Punkt, von dem eine Wasserentnahme möglich ist, also Aufstellort für (P)FPN. Entsprechend ist eine Deklarierung eines vollständigen Teichs (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/22733106 auch etwas schwierig.
b) Die Angabe des Volumens bei unerschöpflichen Löschwasserstellen ist überflüssig bis willkürlich.
c) Ich denke, du hast das Volumen in Litern angegeben. Dann muss entweder die Einheit ergänzt oder in m³ umgerechnet werden. Standard ist m³.
d) Nur als formeller Hinweis: wegen des On-the-ground-Prinzips sollten die Saugstellen entsprechend gekennzeichnet sein.
7. Unzulässige Werte
Die Hydranten 12256517881, 12256517880, 12256517883, 12256517882, 12256517885, 12256517884, 12256517887 und 12256517886 haben eine Nennweite „0“.
8. Saugstellen (Brunnen?)
a) Bei den fire:hydrant=pipe fehlt die Angabe der Wasserquelle und ob gesaugt werden muss oder z.B. eine E-Pumpe eingebaut ist.
b) Bitte den operator kontrollieren, siehe z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12256517862. Solche Anlagen liegen meist in privater Verpflichtung.
c) Welche Einheit haben die Fördermengen?

Bei Fragen bitte einfach melden.
Viele Grüße
Silas_229 (2024-10-18 22:39:27+00:00): Vielen Dank für das sehr gründliche Feedback!
Da in meinem Datenbestand Adressen eingetragen waren, hatte ich diese übernommen. Ich stimme aber auf jeden Fall zu, dass diese nicht notwendig sind und schlimmstenfalls sogar zu falschen Darstellungen führen könnten.
Die Saugstellen mitten in den Teichen werde ich vorerst wieder entfernen, bis ich die genauen Positionen kenne.
Als Betreiber habe ich immer die Gemeinde eingetragen, das werde ich auf Privatgrundstücken wieder rückgängig machen.
Zu der Einheit der Fördermengen kann ich leider auch keine Angaben machen. Die Volumen sollten alle in m^3 umgerechnet worden sein. Werde ich nochmal überprüfen. Die falschen Leitungsdurchmesser werde ich auch entfernen.
Zu weiteren Details wie Lage oder Kupplungen (meistens hier B-B) habe ich keine Daten.

Viele Grüße
Silas_229 (2024-10-18 23:27:33+00:00): Hi,
die Änderungen sind jetzt live: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158070808#map=12/52.0101/10.4060
Udarian (2024-10-17 00:39:58+00:00): the problem with using "West Old Cutler Road" for the road name for addresses is that there is no road named like that in the area, its named "Old Cutler Road" not "West Old Cutler Road", so this causes data issues, for more info see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=addresses&lon=-80.36635&lat=25.56076&zoom=18&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=buildings%2Cbuildings_with_addresses%2Cpostal_code%2Centrances_deprecated%2Centrances%2Cno_addr_street%2Cstreet_not_found%2Cplace_not_found%2Cmisformatted_housenumber_lenient%2Cnodes_with_addresses_defined%2Cnodes_with_addresses_interpolated%2Cinterpolation%2Cinterpolation_errors%2Cconnection_lines%2Cnearest_points%2Cnearest_roads%2Cnearest_areas%2Caddrx_on_nonclosed_way%2Cbuildings%2Cbuildings_with_addresses%2Cpostal_code%2Centrances_deprecated%2Centrances%2Cno_addr_street%2Cstreet_not_found%2Cplace_not_found%2Cmisformatted_housenumber_lenient%2Cnodes_with_addresses_defined%2Cnodes_with_addresses_interpolated%2Cinterpolation%2Cinterpolation_errors%2Cconnection_lines%2Cnearest_points%2Cnearest_roads%2Cnearest_areas%2Caddrx_on_nonclosed_way .
notd3nny (2024-10-17 00:59:01+00:00): I'm going by Miami's official address database: https://gisweb.miamidade.gov/emaps/. 

Should we divert from the actual address of the buildings just because they cause data issues?

Moreover, from Wikipedia:
"It continues west as Old Cutler Road until it crosses West 107th Avenue and becomes West Old Cutler Road. It continues west-northwest as West Old Cutler Road until it crosses West 112th Avenue and shares its name with South 220th Street. South 220th Street is no longer called West Old Cutler Road west of US 1."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Old_Cutler_Road

It seems that West Cutler Road is the correct name of the section of the road with the addresses:
https://www.google.com/search?q=west+old+cutler+road
Udarian (2024-10-17 01:22:16+00:00): then we change the name of the road and close https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3071873 once that's done since the osmi issues were why I opened and kept open that note.

also we cant use google as a source since google hasn't given us (OSM) the right to use their data in OSM so it cant be used as a source.
notd3nny (2024-10-17 01:40:26+00:00): I was using the Google search result more to illustrate my point with my comment.

For the record, the actual source for my changes is the Wikipedia passage I referenced, and Miami-Dade's address/street map database that I linked.
notd3nny (2024-10-17 01:42:50+00:00): I do not use Google or Google Map's information for any of my changes. All of my changes are from publicly available information.
Udarian (2024-10-17 01:49:31+00:00): I understand that, I was just making sure, but ya, feel free to change the name of that segment of old cutler.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-09 09:20:12+00:00): Hello!

You used
surface=unpaved|
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1324527341/history

Have you maybe meant
surface=unpaved
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:15:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:17:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:16:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:13:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:17:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
felipeeugenio (2024-10-17 14:09:34+00:00): Hola. Si seleccionas una estructura y usas la letra Q puedes cuadrarla. asi quedan con angulos perfectos de 90 grados y no los polígonos irregulares que agregaste, que son a mano alzada. Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157988341
ika-chan! UK-USA (2024-10-17 01:35:47+00:00): Clarification: it's the small track that is presumed split in half.
BrackoNe (2024-10-17 10:49:45+00:00): Hello. Please could you please provide the source of this change? I could see that firstly you have moved the roundabout - I can understand that is based on the Mapillary trails, but how did you make this change? Based on what?

Thanks!
ShenandoahValley (2024-10-18 17:37:42+00:00): Hi, thanks for the question. 

Apple has an agreement with Maxar to use their more recent imagery to edit OpenStreetMap, which is not publicly available for editing OpenStreetMap. We generally use the imagery that is already available in JOSM but where we do use that more recent imagery, we always cite it and the date the imagery is from in the changeset source. The imagery I used for this changeset is from 2022-09-24 and confirmed the changes to the roundabout. Hope this answers your question!
BrackoNe (2024-10-21 09:21:46+00:00): Thanks for the reply.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:24:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:12:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:16:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:12:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:14:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
tyfi (2024-10-17 02:45:31+00:00): This also smoothed out some roads and tagged some businesses along West Outer Road.
Frans S (2024-10-19 13:25:00+00:00): See my message to you about mapping.
On this changeset you made so many errors that I am considering to remove your mappings here.
Wrong tagging of highways, 
Complete road tagged as bridge

Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157989668
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-08 03:41:23+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164659013
MYYA_Mitchi (2024-11-04 06:11:14+00:00): #tt_event
MYYA_Mitchi (2024-11-04 06:11:11+00:00): #tt_event
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:18:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:14:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601