piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
flohoff (2023-03-02 15:22:22+00:00): Moin,
guck dir den hier nochmal an - Da ist lanes:backward=1 aber in turn:lanes sind 2 elemente:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/232784565
Leo Slager (2023-03-03 23:09:40+00:00): één richtings verkeer verwijderd van de Gemeneweg.

Je maakt echt teveel fouten !
mavl (2023-04-23 16:04:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:54:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:03:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:56:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:04:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-04-22 14:02:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135228709, 135225625 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to fictional edits.
sheldonelectric (2026-03-07 12:40:24+00:00): Hola, donde se encontraron los nombres espanoles?
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-03-05 07:15:48+00:00): What's with the weird geometry on the roadways?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133183590
Koreller (2023-03-01 18:41:25+00:00): source : https://rg.ru/2023/02/26/v-pheniane-poiavitsia-krupnejshij-restoran-sobachatiny.html and
https://www.nknews.org/pro/kim-jong-un-approves-lavish-new-dog-meat-restaurant-on-pyongyang-riverfront/
mjans (2023-03-03 14:34:01+00:00): Ik weet niet of er in deze wijzigingenset iets mis gelopen is, maar al het bos is verdwenen van de kaart...
vandepwv (2023-03-03 17:34:58+00:00): Inderdaad, ik heb duidelijk iets verkeerd gedaan.
Weet jij hoe ik/iemand dit ongedaan kan maken?
mjans (2023-03-04 07:16:55+00:00): Ik denk dat ik heb kunnen oplossen, er zat een klein foutje in de  moltipolygon, een stukje 'gekapt bos' dat een stukje 'heide' overlapte.
vandepwv (2023-03-04 08:20:44+00:00): Ik heb zojuist in Garmin BaseCamp de "OpenFietsMap (Benelux_v04-03-2023)" geladen en het ziet er goed uit. Heel erg bedankt voor uw opmerkzaamheid en uw hulp. Dikke duim.
GinaroZ (2023-03-01 22:34:47+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for the edits. There's a note here referring to a business, is that the same one you've just added?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2904925
anon98 (2023-03-03 14:12:32+00:00): Yes, Squares has been replaced by "Vigo Express"
gormur (2023-04-13 22:55:06+00:00): NVDB er en god kilde, men desverrre ikke alltid "on the ground truth". Pass på i områder med omfattende ombygninger på gang.  Rundkjøringen du slettet kjørte jeg gjennom nå i kveld. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1128003100
NKA (2023-04-14 15:14:04+00:00): Bra du oppdaget. Og lurt å legge på en note slik du gjorde nå på veien.
mavl (2023-04-23 15:54:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:54:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
pio2_122 (2023-03-01 20:58:55+00:00): Są to pasy ruchu dla rowerów wyznaczone na jezdni, a nie oddzielne drogi dla rowerów. Zgodnie z OSM-wiki pasy ruchu dla rowerów oznacza się poprzez dodanie tagu cycleway=lane do tagów drogi, na której są wyznaczone: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cycleway%3Dlane.

Poprawiłem to.
Florek89 (2023-03-03 15:51:26+00:00): Okej, dziękuję za wytłumaczenie. Nawet dla mnie to było trochę dziwne.
mavl (2023-04-23 16:00:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
Warin61 (2023-03-03 00:19:44+00:00): Hi,
The relation 12950672 has Way: 1085307271 tagged as an inner .. but that has no outer around it.. that is an error. I am not familiar with it so I'll leave you to fix it.
mavl (2023-04-23 16:08:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
eggie (2023-03-02 09:41:05+00:00): Lijkt me oke...  sport =golf is inderdaad al ingebakken.

MVG
eggie
74523978 (2023-03-01 22:15:43+00:00): Ook hier bestaande gebouwen opnieuw geïmporteerd en geschiedenis en tags gewist.
mavl (2023-04-23 15:59:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:06:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:55:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
74523978 (2023-03-01 21:45:09+00:00): Het is nieuw voor mij dat een bestaand gebouw opnieuw wordt geïmporteerd waarbij de geschiedenis en tags verloren gaan.
74523978 (2023-03-13 09:18:56+00:00): Ik wacht nog op antwoord.
luisforte (2023-05-05 22:52:34+00:00): Boa noite Paulo,
a tag "addr:postcode" aplica-se somente a edificios e a POIs.
Para estradas ou localidades é utilizada a tag postal_code, como será o caso da Praça Henrique Lopes Mendonça.
Luis
paulo106 (2023-05-06 05:01:33+00:00): Boa noite. Obrigado pela informação. Vou corrigir logo que possivel. 
Cumprimentos 
Paulo
paulo106 (2023-05-10 16:12:57+00:00): Tive a rever e não encontrei o erro. Onde coloquei a tag  "addr:postcode" foi nos edifícios pertencentes a praça pelo que vejo. Ou não percebi bem a falha?
luisforte (2023-05-10 17:08:26+00:00): Viva, Paulo
A etiqueta "addr:postcode" da Praça não foi colocada neste conjunto de alterações mas no anterior, como se pode ver no histórico (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/242869705/history). 
Foi  falta minha não ter referido isso no meu comentário.
Corrigi há minutos a situação  para ajudar a clarificar o uso da etiqueta postal_code.
Luis
paulo106 (2023-05-10 17:13:21+00:00): Obrigado Luis pelo esclarecimento.
Cumprimentos
Paulo
btrs (2023-03-26 17:22:00+00:00): blijkbaar weer een typo Jan.. 100000V op een minor_distribution onderstation lijkt me wat veel.. :-/
Jakka (2023-03-26 17:25:24+00:00): vermoed het ook aangepast
emersonveenstra (2023-03-02 11:35:46+00:00): Hi,

Street names must not be abbreviated in OSM (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Abbreviation_(don't_do_it)), could you please expand this to Wolverine Road? Thanks!
MxxCon (2023-03-06 06:27:51+00:00): Hello.
Please note that you must not copy data from Google Maps into OSM. It is considered copyright violation.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133185913
MxxCon (2023-03-06 06:27:55+00:00): Hello.
Please note that you must not copy data from Google Maps into OSM. It is considered copyright violation.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133185913
eggie (2023-03-02 09:33:28+00:00): Dag Da...   
Even gekeken. Beter toch geen adresnodes verwijderen. Leeghalen van exra info kan natuurlijk wel.  Die zijn import vanuit het Kadaster en worden
periodiek geupdated. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-03-02 09:38:18+00:00): 
Adresnode 24 heb ik  hersteld.
Het adres dat je extra hebt toegevoegd aan het vlak van de golfbaan klopt overigens ook niet. Het is hier de Gemeente Enschede.
Dit adres bestaat dus niet. Het gaat dus verwarring geven.

Kijk je nog even? 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-03-02 09:51:05+00:00): Een dilemma, want hun website geeft  7548 RR Boekelo aan...  Maar dat klopt dus niet volgens het Kadaster. 
Denk dus beter aanpassen in OSM.
Da1ie (2023-03-02 19:11:40+00:00): Toch terug gezet naar Enschede, de verwarring ontstond ook bij mij toen ik het adres op de website zag. Het lijkt me beter consistent te blijven en voor de hele Spieleweg Enschede aan te houden.
user_115918 (2023-03-06 18:16:57+00:00): These edits are great to see. Nice source of data too.
GerdP (2023-07-30 06:01:23+00:00): Moin!
Du hast hier einen highway=track angelegt, der unter einem Bach verläuft. Sollte wahrscheinlich anders rum sein, oder?
https://www.osm.org/way/1150536753
herisusa (2023-08-02 10:25:21+00:00): Stimmt, habe ich gerade geändert.
PaoloLombardi (2023-03-02 10:59:47+00:00): Buondì
Non so come "importi" queste ways su OSM ma sarebbe opportuno ridurre il numero di nodi poiché ho riscontrato sul campo che altre tue ways non sono ben tracciate (non sempre un maggior numero di nodi vuol dire una maggiore precisione del tracciato) quindi per "correggerle eliminando nodi inutili si allungano solo i tempi di correzione specialmente sul campo."
Aggiungo anche che non è necessario collegare i nodi delle ways ai contorni delle "Landuse"!
Se prima di pubblicare in futuro puoi fare un controllo così diventa tutto più semplice.
Grazie.
Ciao
eggie (2023-03-02 08:01:46+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback...  Prima zo.. Kleine aanpassing verricht. Je info samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
NorthCrab_upload (2023-03-01 20:20:21+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1150539918
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/255776312

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
cserpell (2023-03-02 14:47:28+00:00): Hola, gracias por el aporte. Esto significa que la calle está cerrada y ya no se puede virar desde 6 Poniente hacia San Martín?
Cnidaria (2023-03-02 22:13:32+00:00): Hola cserpell. Sí, un usuario de Maps informó que se cerró la calle con una barrera y no es posible girar a la izquierda.
osmviborg (2023-03-02 06:38:23+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:network?uselang=da#Bicycle,_hiking_and_other_recreational_routes - ikke bare en '*'
conradoos (2023-03-05 16:26:52+00:00): Dokąd prowadzi ta ścieżka? Faktycznie aż do samego płotu?
blacx (2023-03-05 12:25:27+00:00): Si us plau, llegeix la wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:usage
 en concret aquesta part:
The distinction between main and branch line in general should be straightforward, but may be vague in certain circumstances; for example, if the branch line is very long. Some generic criteria are described in the table, below, but one should consider each case individually. Often, branch lines are described as such in the official name, however, sometimes rail is named "XYZ Main Line" even though it is more appropriately tagged usage=branch. 

OSM ha de mapejar la realitat, i la realitat es que aquesta linia es una linia secundaria. En concret es una lina secundaria de saragossa-barcelona, les principals sent la de lleida i la de casp. A mes, aquesta linia no es fa servir de pas per cap tren, ni de mercaderies ni de passatges, tots els trens son basicament locals, i d'aqui un parell d'anys ni tan sols hi haura trens que se la fagin sencera, ja que es dividira en dos operacionalment, de lleida a manresa i de barcelona a manresa.
Si no has rebut la invitacio al grup d'osm de la comunitat catalana aqui la tens: https://t.me/osmcat
on ja vam debatir i votar al seu dia com s'havia de classificar aquesta linia. De linia primaria en te molt poc.
En tot cas podem debatir fins on hauria de ser main per la zona de barcelona, potser fins a montcada bifurcació.
blacx (2023-03-05 12:27:43+00:00): Et recomano que et miris una mica com està fet per europa a openrailwaymap.org, trobaràs moltes linies que amb la mateixa referencia tenen trams com a main i trams com a branch.
conradoos (2023-03-05 16:28:11+00:00): Dodawanie tagów access=unknown nie jest potrzebne, bo nie daje żadnej informacji o dostępie do obiektu.
Allison P (2023-03-02 13:05:40+00:00): For schools, it is generally better to add information to the grounds rather than the building. Especially because the address and name were already present on grounds, this just duplicated the information. I've gone ahead and drawn the school grounds now, though.
WoodWoseWulf (2023-03-02 05:23:25+00:00): Hi, it looks like you've drawn the trails here twice in some places.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-03-24 11:12:50+00:00): golf features should not overlap
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133188583
PierZen (2023-04-02 16:25:56+00:00): Vous avez ajouté plus de 100 chemins contribuant à alourdir encore plus la gestion de cette relation et cela sans en discuter avec la communauté du Québec. Voir discussion sur https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ca/2023-April/010724.html
Hartz Beltza (2023-04-03 01:08:12+00:00): Comment je peuxsavoir qu'il y a une discussion en cours ? J'ai juste essayé selon le site du cadastre du Québec de nommer des îles ou des baies et délimiter quelle île est au Nunavut ou au Québec. https://appli.mern.gouv.qc.ca/Infolot/Info/Licence
PierZen (2023-04-03 13:28:10+00:00): Merci Hartz à délimiter les limites du Québec. A noter que nous avons eu plusieurs périodes avec des problèmes d'édition de ces relations complexes. Il est donc important de discuter pour régler les problèmes et réviser les relations avec de nouvelles données.  Plusieurs relations sont affectées simultanément lors d'édition de zones côtières.  Dans ton cas, je réalise effectivement que tu ajoutes de îles et il es important de documenter les données disponibles. Le lien que tu as fourni ne permet pas de voir ces données. ,a provenance des donné.  La discussion sur talk-ca pourrait aussi permettre de documenter ce qui est le Québec ou le Nunavut.
Hartz Beltza (2023-04-03 13:41:12+00:00): Le lien que j'ai fourni n'est pas direct. Tu dois aller en bas et accepter les conditions et ouvrir. J'ai suivi les limites rouges du cadastre.
PierZen (2023-04-03 14:11:17+00:00): Le site https://toponymie.gouv.qc.ca/ fournit des infos contradictoires. D'autre part, de nouvelles ententes avec les Cris et les Inuits viennent toutes reviser cela. Important donc d'en discuter pour trouver une solution.
Hartz Beltza (2023-04-03 14:16:38+00:00): Ok parfait. Je vais laisser faire alors et ne plus pertuber vos ajouts. Désolé, je pensais que le cadastre était une source fiable et à jour.
DENelson83 (2023-04-03 17:02:09+00:00): *All* islands in Hudson and James Bays belong to Nunavut, without exception.  The boundary between Quebec and Nunavut must coincide with the mainland shoreline.
PierZen (2023-04-03 17:13:34+00:00): Inexact si on se fie aux différentes ententes avec les nations autochtones publiées sur le site https://rcaanc-cirnac.gc.ca.
DENelson83 (2023-04-03 19:19:58+00:00): Irrelevant.  First Nation lands can transcend provincial and territorial boundaries, and such boundaries would have no bearing on First Nation activities in the area.  But the Quebec Boundaries Extension Act of 1912 puts the Quebec-Nunavut boundary *exactly* on Quebec's mainland shoreline.
DENelson83 (2023-04-03 19:27:11+00:00): What I think we should do instead is draw the boundary of the Eeyou Marine Region as outlined in this document.  https://www.gov.nu.ca/sites/default/files/files/017%2520-%2520Eeyour%2520Marine%2520Region%2520Land%2520Claims%2520Agreement%2520(EMRLCA).pdf
PierZen (2023-04-03 22:21:20+00:00): @DENelson83, Nous devons d'abord réparer les limites suite à vos éditions précédentes qui ont ajouté des centaines de membres. Je vous demandes ne pas entreprendre de nouvelles éditions avant de venir  discuter avec la communauté locale https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ca/2023-April/010724.html
DENelson83 (2023-04-04 01:12:16+00:00): If you are talking about all of the bodies of water relations I added, you should note that two of the reasons I put those in was for the benefit of the OpenSeaMap project and of users of Garmin devices.  I would ask that you leave all of those relations untouched, and try to find a suitable compromise between your desire for more efficient relations and my desire to maintain this toponymic schema.
pitscheplatsch (2023-03-04 11:47:46+00:00): Just a test?

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
Felipe Kinoshita (2023-03-04 12:06:59+00:00): Hey, sorry about that. It was just a test, I was making a change about that involved the edit dialogs on Gnome Maps.

Not going to spam you guys anymore!
pitscheplatsch (2023-03-04 12:09:19+00:00): Hi Felipe, thanks for your answer!

#HappyMapping
jaap de vries (2023-04-07 06:21:47+00:00): Ik zie nu dat je binnen het bestaande parkeerterrein ook losse parkeervakken hebt aangegeven maar niet overal. Kan je dat verklaren? Of geef je enkel vakken aan waar je met je elektrische auto of gehandicaptenkaart kan parkeren?
jaap de vries (2023-04-07 06:22:46+00:00): Bij andere vakken heb je aangegeven dat het om privé vakken gaat, staat hier een bord bij die dat aangeeft?
jxpsert (2023-04-07 06:49:28+00:00): Bij een parkeerplaats is er een rij plaatsen die niet te zien is vanaf de satteliet- of luchtfoto’s. De privé plaats is een gehandicaptenplaats voor een specifiek kenteken.
jaap de vries (2023-04-07 07:00:31+00:00): Dan zijn er veel privé parkeerplaatsen daar met de juiste RVV E06 bebording anders mag het niet, zal eens kijken straks.
jaap de vries (2023-04-07 08:41:46+00:00): Ik heb zojuist een ronde door de wijken gedaan en geconstateerd dat er hier en daar wel gehandicapten parkeerplaatsen zijn die het bord RVV E06 met kenteken hebben, o.a. in de Gildekamp, Nieuwstadweg, Akerbroekweg, Horstacker. Andere parkeervakken die je met privé hebt gemarkeerd zijn openbaar en hebben geen bord met kenteken ect.  Ik zal e.e.a. aanpassen naar de werkelijkheid "Maps whats on the ground" regel.
mrpulley (2025-01-01 10:21:01+00:00): 22882321 maxspeed 60 (not 100)
384469152, 384469150, 384469149, 22882332 maxspeed 40 (not 100)
updated at changeset 160856283
cyclehunter (2023-03-01 22:17:39+00:00): Source for track and turbine position: Esri world imagery
mrpulley (2025-01-01 09:51:08+00:00): These two residential roads come off Tathra Road (with maxspeed 50) - no speed zone signs on these streets, so likely also maxspeed 50 (updated at changeset 160856283)
mrpulley (2025-01-01 09:57:20+00:00): Maxspeed of 1150571233 is now 50
990640952 maxspeed correct
Allison P (2023-03-12 03:17:58+00:00): Road suffixes should be expanded (Ct -> Court, Blvd -> Boulevard). Additionally, names should not be used as descriptions like "Cycle, Walking and Jogging Pathway".
mrpulley (2024-12-07 10:55:52+00:00): Maxspeed for way 28711423 correct. Way 668665150 is 60 (same zone as adjacent highway)
marc__marc (2023-06-16 19:54:46+00:00): Bonjour,
408/817 n'est pas un nom, c'est une ref ? 2 ref ?
si l'object a une importance historique, il y a  aussi https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dboundary_stone
Cordialement,
Marc
emersonveenstra (2023-03-01 23:57:10+00:00): Hi,

Looks like you didn't add roles to the turn restriction here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15547791
Vincent de Phily (2023-08-07 12:34:23+00:00): Wondering about bus stop, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3821223 but maybe you had a better source than I had.
AntMadeira (2023-03-02 01:13:32+00:00): Olá, Moitasteam.
Neste conjunto de edições, eliminaste o ponto de aldeia de Moitas Venda.
Talvez te tenhas equivocado, mas a edição será revertida.
Peço-te que tenhas atenção quando eliminas pontos ou outros elementos, para teres a certeza que não estás a apagar nada de importante.

Cumprimentos,
António Madeira.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-03-01 23:22:04+00:00): 133072707, 133014347, 133012033, 133007459, 132976868, 133072728
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-03-01 23:22:36+00:00): 132976865
nevw (2023-03-03 04:15:58+00:00): Hi
there appears to be an error here for you to fix.
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.73651&lat=-16.99666&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik+Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways
nevw (2023-03-03 04:17:36+00:00): corrected link...
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.73651&lat=-16.99666&zoom=14
emersonveenstra (2023-03-01 23:50:54+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for your contributions! Please note that phone numbers need a +1 for international area codes, and website urls need an http:// or https:// in front of them. Would you mind fixing those two things?
emersonveenstra (2023-03-01 23:49:16+00:00): Hi,

I reverted your changesets because they broke the building. Please make a new Point and put the point over the entrance door of the Blu Hookah Lounge and put the details there, not on the entire building. Thanks!
NorthCrab_upload (2023-03-01 23:40:16+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o miejscowości. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, zastosuj kombinację addr:city + addr:street. Jeśli nie, przekaż nazwę miejscowości w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/185180890

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-06 11:00:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134571999 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed mechanica edits, including those referred to at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7024 and some others.  See also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/currently-ongoing-automated-edit-for-service-vehicle/97737 .