piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NorthCrab_upload (2024-02-02 20:40:19+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11580057423

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Tetryk (2024-02-02 20:42:20+00:00): Źle połączony lub rozłączony węzeł
NorthCrab_upload (2024-02-02 20:50:28+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1245665344

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-03 04:56:01+00:00): Dzięki!
marczoutendijk (2024-02-08 09:28:39+00:00): What is "llw" supposed to indicate?

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
MappSurfer (2024-02-06 21:02:04+00:00): Hallo habi

Auf den Luftbildern von swisstopo, wie auch in der Realität, ist dieses Gleis natürlich abgebaut, allerdings nicht spurlos, wie ich selbst überprüft habe, so man kann es z.B an dem Verlauf der anderen Gleise oder der Oberleitung erkennen. Ausserdem ist ein weiterer Grund, dass ich das Gleis in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147151593 wiederhinzugefügt habe, dass es immer noch in der Amtlichen Vermessung eingetragen ist.

Liebe Grüsse
MappSurfer
NieWnen (2024-02-03 12:15:42+00:00): Dzięki!
Map_HeRo (2024-02-07 21:28:47+00:00): Hallo ti_rey,  Du hast im NSG Säulingssee diverse Teiche an Stellen eingetragen, an denen schon seit Jahren kein permanentes Wasser mehr steht - das sind ganz flache Tümpel, die im Rahmen der NSG Pflege zum Teil nur temporär unterhalten werden und dann wieder verlanden. Der gesamte Wasserspiegel im NSG wird permanent mit 2 großen Pumpen reguliert und ist je nach Niederschlagsmenge einem ständigen Wandel unterworfen.

Die unterschiedliche Färbung der ehemaligen Tümpel auf dem Luftbild kommt oft von der etwas üppigeren Vegetation. Schau Dir einfach zum Vergleich mal das Luftbild von Bing an.

Bist Du jemals dort vor Ort gewesen? 

Ich halte es für keine gute Idee, solche schwer erkennbaren Objekte nur nach Luftbild ohne Überprüfung vor Ort zu mappen. 
Gruß Mikke
ti_rey_531 (2024-02-07 23:52:46+00:00): Hallo Mikke, die Situation vor Ort ist mir bekannt und ich bin auch des öfteren dort. In die beweideten Flächen darf man normalerweise ja nicht hinein. Von daher halte ich die Abgrenzungen der angelegten Tümpel nach Orthofotos (übrigens in verschiedenen Befliegungen) für vertretbar. Man kann sich natürlich darüber streiten, welcher Zeitzustand kartiert werden soll – es ist eben in der Realität ein dynamischer Bereich. Manche der Tümpel ließen sich sicher noch mit intermittend=yes kennzeichnen.
Map_HeRo (2024-02-09 16:47:19+00:00): Mit dem "dynamischen Bereich" hast Du auf jeden Fall Recht. Dort werden mit Absicht immer wieder neue Tümpel geschaffen und alte trockenfallen gelassen, um eine möglichst große Habitatvielfalt anzubieten. Genau aus diesem Grund halte ich es für nicht so sinnvoll, dort Flächen zu erfassen, die auf jedem Luftbild anders dargestellt sind, so dass eine Aussage darüber, was sich dort wirklich befindet, daraus nicht abgeleitet werden kann.
Fizzie-DWG (2024-08-09 06:06:30+00:00): Reverted by DWG for apparent fictitious mapping

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155006161
GEO ECLA (2024-02-05 10:02:50+00:00): Merci pour ses améliorations. Les panneaux Avenir ont été retirés récemment suite à l'application du Règlement Local de Publicité (changeset 147086515). D'autres panneaux devraient être retirés d'ici la mi-mars.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147002027
emersonveenstra (2024-02-03 22:48:33+00:00): Hi there,

You're looking for type=multipolygon (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon), not type=boundary. Also, when you create a relation, the tags go on the relation, not the individual ways. Hope this helps, let me know if you have any more questions!
Nicroz (2024-02-04 02:58:41+00:00): Thanks for the response, I read through the wiki page you linked and updated the parking lot. I think its good now, mind taking a second look to make sure I got it right. Thanks again.
emersonveenstra (2024-02-09 14:17:38+00:00): Oops, sorry for the late reply, looks good now, thanks!
Berdly (2024-02-02 22:46:26+00:00): I forgot to finish the description, forgive me
balint36 (2024-02-03 11:22:37+00:00): *Győrszentiván állomáson
Promasu (2024-02-02 23:17:26+00:00): Pressed enter to often.
Made polygons rectangular
Jan Olieslagers (2024-02-03 10:15:05+00:00): The airstrip was already neatly given in way 387215767, and we should avoid double entries. I intend to remove.
matt_ellery (2024-02-03 19:20:17+00:00): Hi Dan, you have split way 1041817380 into two and combined both parts into a multipolygon. What was your intention with this changeset?
Jan Olieslagers (2024-02-03 20:00:06+00:00): There's a good question, Matt, or at least one that I totally concur with. I would not object to reverting this entire changeset, but in courtesy we ought to wait for a response from Dan, for a couple of days at least.
DanGregory (2024-02-03 20:35:33+00:00): No idea what happened there I'm afraid; feel free to undo - I would if I knew how!
Jan Olieslagers (2024-02-03 20:55:37+00:00): Thanks, Dan! Unfortunately I am at least as ignorant as you on the way to undo your changeset - if Matt cannot do it, we could call on the DataWorkingGroup.
Be assured that I bear no grudge, we all make mistakes in our own time, and this OSM thing is getting very complex and correspondingly delicate.
Very kindly,
matt_ellery (2024-02-03 21:21:43+00:00): No problem, I've reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147034289
Jan Olieslagers (2024-02-03 21:36:48+00:00): Thanks!
pitscheplatsch (2024-02-04 09:33:11+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

Just a test?
AgusQui (2024-02-04 18:56:09+00:00): Por favor usar imagenes aéreas para ajustar los landuse, estas siendo muy impreciso. Es más costoso arreglar lo que estas haciendo que hacerlo bien desde el principio.
fortera_au (2024-02-03 03:23:47+00:00): Hey, it would be best to just map the whole parking area as amenity=parking. Also, the section near the north west part of the building isn't really parking.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147005374
fortera_au (2024-02-21 03:00:07+00:00): Hi, I've removed all the individual parking areas bar the loading zone, there's already an amenity=parking way covering the whole parking lot, and that's how parking areas should be drawn (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking).

I've also tagged the loading area to signify this as well.
MxxCon (2024-02-09 04:01:50+00:00): Hello.
Please note that opening hours value should be not just a single time when a biz opens, but the actual time range of when it's operational.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147005530
dilinger (2024-02-09 04:42:17+00:00): The business closed down. I couldn't figure out how to specify that.
MxxCon (2024-02-09 04:45:52+00:00): Ah.
In StreetComplete when it's asking for opening hours or I think pretty much any other questions, you can tap on "Other Answer" or 3 dots and there should be an option "it doesn't exist". That will properly flag that location as vacant. 👍
Richard (2024-03-05 19:55:27+00:00): This is absolutely disastrous. You have overwritten large amounts of correct information. Bike access on most towpaths is permissive - by permission of the Canal & River Trust. It is not by right and it is not "designated".

(Also - the Coventry Canal as part of the BCN? Really?!)
SpinOff (2024-02-03 18:34:55+00:00): Hej. Użyłeś tagu name do opisywania cech obiektu, co jest niezgodne z zasadami OSM. Tutaj jest więcej informacji: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:name

Poprawiłem już błędne edycje. Mam jeszcze pytanie odnośnie tego obiektu: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11580717877

Czym to dokładnie jest? Naprawdę jest tam sklepik z biżuterią?
consulente_finanziario (2024-02-03 01:44:44+00:00): grazie
opendcc (2024-02-04 08:41:51+00:00): reverted; User does not respond to changeset comments
opendcc (2024-02-04 08:41:44+00:00): reverted; User does not respond to changeset comments
streetsurvma (2024-02-20 14:17:33+00:00): Hi Jnighan.  Inquiring about your changes to "driveway" status on the roads in the Maplewood cemetery.  Use of "service road" is fairly universal in cemeteries since they are open to the public.  They were tagged as service before the section names were added. I'd like to edit them back.  Thank you.
jnighan (2024-02-21 16:35:20+00:00): Hi, they are still service roads. Adding service=driveway specifies the type of service road. Look around CT, the roads in cemeteries almost always have service=driveway. That tag has nothing to do with public access. Also, the names you have added are not appropriate. The roads are not named "Section 5-8," etc. That is the area of the cemetery, it is not the name of the road. Please find another way to map the cemetery, and remove those names. Read more here:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
streetsurvma (2024-03-03 00:59:06+00:00): Again driveway is used for private property, such as access to a home or busines.  This is a publicably acessable cemetery.  Service road is what is used other cemeteries.  If there are others in CT using driveway, they should be changed.       
The section names were added to the the roads to help with finding gravesites.  Thank you.
jnighan (2024-03-03 03:49:21+00:00): Hi, this is simply not accurate. 

1) Service=driveway implies nothing regarding access. It does not imply "private property" as you say. Access=private is the only tag that indicates private access.

2) Name=* must be used to represent names, not 'any data that "helps with finding" things'. Please read the documentation from my previous reply.
philippec (2024-02-07 13:38:30+00:00): Brussel Brigitinnen
en zo navigeren we in twee omgevingen.
RaphaelPasloin (2024-02-07 13:52:11+00:00): Hello Philippec,

Can you explain what is the purpose of your comment ? 

I have added a mapillary key to object. This key represent the object  and has the correct format. 

So i ask you why you think this changeset need a comment ? 

Also please , we are on a collaborative map : a minimum of polite expressions is apprecied when reaching out other mappers.

Have a good day,
Raphaël
SLMapper (2026-07-02 20:59:11+00:00): Hi, welcome to openstreetmap! Why do you think this is a https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Drest_area? Greetings
Warin61 (2024-02-03 22:40:38+00:00): The one member residential relation is not a replacement for the residential relation that was altered to the point of making no contribution (no outer way as it has been deleted) as it does not cover the area south of Stringybark Reserve

One member relations should be removed with the tags simply moved to what was the outer way of the relation. If the one member relation has no outer way then it makes no sense.
MxxCon (2024-02-09 04:29:24+00:00): Hello.
When mapping buildings, please make sure to align their shapes to the baseline, not rooftop, because the position of the rooftop line can change as satellite imagery is taken from different positions in space, but baseline of the building will always remain static. This is especially more pronounced the higher a building is.
In this specific edit you aligned one side of the building 248516693 to its base, but another to its roof. That's obviously not the correct shape.

What I tend to do if I can't see the whole baseline of a building is to try to map it to its rooftop to make sure the overall shape is accurate, and then move and align the whole shape to one or more visible corner. That way both the shape and positioning will be accurate.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147007103
rayl- (2024-02-09 16:30:09+00:00): Thanks for the tip, I realized the satellite imagery was off from when I last used it after doing a few more edits, will try to fix!
GeeMaps! (2024-10-19 23:41:35+00:00): Hi. A Note (https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4480712) has just been posted to say that this "helipad has moved". Do you know if this is the correct  "new" position, or the old? Thanks!
ahunterg95 (2024-10-20 00:08:13+00:00): Yes, looking online it appears that the new Helipad has now been installed upon the multi-story carpark to the east of the old location. The satellite imagery has yet to be updated by many providers...
Fizzie-DWG (2024-10-23 02:36:51+00:00): Thanks!
MxxCon (2024-02-09 04:33:06+00:00): Are you sure this section belongs to Kissena Corridor Park and not Cunningham Park?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147007433
rayl- (2024-02-09 16:26:41+00:00): https://i.imgur.com/PlWhWLL.png

Oh yeah this one was interesting, I was out at the park 2 weeks ago and saw a NYC Parks sign at the purple X labeled Kissena Corridor Park and then after passing the underpass at the blue X another sign labeled Cunningham Park.  

So I think Francis Lewis Boulevard is the divider, and I think Kissena Corridor park is the red bordered area, although I'm unsure about the forested area above so I avoided changing that and just added what I had confirmed (the area between 73rd and Union)

I'll be back in the park next month when it's a bit warmer and can take a picture of both signs near the underpass to confirm.
VA00 (2024-02-11 09:18:42+00:00): Otwarcie przedwczesne, nadal stoi zakaz ruchu od zapory w dół. W drugą stronę światła i ruch wahadłowy, oraz znak B-1 na odcinku 8 km.
i2004 (2024-02-03 22:35:10+00:00): como hiciste para que las calles las volviste a unir en el mapa
WoodWoseWulf (2024-02-04 07:46:21+00:00): Hi dhruv1729,

Do you have more information about what this is? It looks very much like ordinary private property around a large house.
DD1GJ (2024-02-03 19:35:55+00:00): Hello OI_ethio, welcome to OSM. 

You also added boat=yes at parts of the French/Swiss and German/Swiss borders. You also lifted the boat ban at a barrage. How do you intend to assess the local provisions of the Navigation Ordinance on the basis of a satellite image? 

I have therefore reverted your changes.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-02-03 06:30:17+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nieprawidłowa wartość addr:postcode.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/421989153

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
WieKo68 (2024-06-10 20:05:19+00:00): poprawione
canfe (2024-02-03 16:25:27+00:00): Non bisogna dire che sui sentieri possono passarci i cavalli. E' di default. Andare a vedere sulla wiki, prima di mappare, i default per ogni highway.
Altrimenti metteremmo sulle autostrade horse no su tutte.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147008743
Jrachi (2024-02-04 08:06:05+00:00): Ciao Ezio!
Finalmente ti sei deciso a contribuire.
Non preoccuparti del cane da guardia. Non morde, ma mordicchia.
Ho un solo appunto da farti, oltre a dare ragione a canfe sui tag inutili, Hai cambiato la scala CAI del Sentieri della Resistenza da EE a E.
Come sai la scala CAI prende in considerazione l'intero percorso e sul 217 km c'è un tratto EE sulla cresta tra Vaccarezza e Alpe Pertus. Senza considerare la lunghezza totale, tappe di oltre 20 km e vari brevi tratti esposti o con difficoltà di trovare la traccia...
wa_wheatbelt (2024-02-06 11:43:33+00:00): Thank you for your work. Please just be aware that you should avoid publishing edits over a wide area in a single changeset (this changeset features edits in Sri Lanka and Australia).
ChehrehBargi (2024-02-03 07:01:55+00:00): # Map Internationalization
SpinOff (2024-02-03 12:27:04+00:00): Hej. Nie wiem czy taka była Twoja intencja, ale oznaczyłeś cały ten teren jako park. Patrząc po zdjęciach lotniczych, jest to błąd, bo jest tam zwykły las, w dodatku użytkowany do pozyskania drewna. Wycofałem tę zmianę.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147017906
Nathan_A_RF (2024-02-05 15:07:37+00:00): Please tidy up your edits, not just delete a road segment and be done
Warin61 (2024-02-04 09:48:48+00:00): Hi,
Some of this farmland shows remnant scrub, best to exclude that from te farmland?
KORsidory (2024-02-03 10:59:10+00:00): https://maps.app.goo.gl/hCT4jr1EAwNsR49cA
KORsidory (2024-02-03 10:58:28+00:00): 구글 위성지도를 기반으로 제작하였습니다.
https://maps.app.goo.gl/hCT4jr1EAwNsR49cA
arjunaraoc (2024-02-13 09:23:54+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).

Check my improvement: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147400124
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147010727
maro21 (2024-02-10 20:36:34+00:00): Proszę tak nie dzielić dróg. Nazwy ulic zostały nadane. Adresy są od nazwy ulic, a nie nazwa ulicy od adresów.
mavl (2024-02-04 05:23:52+00:00): Здравствуйте. Добавляя тег "layer=-1", вы хотите сказать, что эти дороги находятся под землёй?
NorthCrab_upload (2024-02-03 08:20:15+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/778392112

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
dvdhoven (2024-02-03 10:04:01+00:00): Nogmaals een dringende oproep beter op rcn te letten.
Vanmorgen heb ik al 2 rcn routes hersteld omdat er onderbrekingen in zaten en nu weer een fors stuk Larserpad was uit 54-81 gevallen.
Zet evt een style aan, waarmee je kunt zien waar de rcn routes lopen

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
SpinOff (2024-02-03 12:19:38+00:00): Hej. Dorzuciłem jeszcze zmianę na podstawie tego artykułu: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147011942
NorthCrab_upload (2024-02-03 09:00:29+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11581476522
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/276683953

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
kaciorx (2024-02-03 09:03:52+00:00): Tak wiem. Mamy dwie miejscowości z taką samą nazwą i kodem pocztowym. Wszystkie numery są zduplikowane. Administracyjnie są to inne powiaty i gminy. Sprawdzałem że nominatim je rozróżnia
NorthCrab (2024-02-03 12:55:38+00:00): A czy ten budynek nie powinien mieć numeru 9? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/276683953

https://img.monicz.dev/-SnNKxcmkMT
NorthCrab (2024-02-03 12:56:28+00:00): Nie wygląda po numeracji w okolicy aby był to przypadek o którym mówisz
kaciorx (2024-02-03 13:12:03+00:00): Mój błąd. Sądziłem, że bot się przyczepił o to samo co walidator josm-a wyrzucił co wyżej opisałem. Jednak to były jakieś stare nie moje zmiany. Poprawiłem
NorthCrab (2024-02-03 13:34:10+00:00): OKi :-)
SpinOff (2024-02-03 12:12:33+00:00): Hej. Pasy rowerowe taguje się na linii drogi, nie oddzielną linią. Poprawiłem już tę ulicę, więc możesz podpatrzyć jak jest poprawnie.

Polecam ten artykuł: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Rowery#Pasy_dla_rower%C3%B3w_na_drogach_jednokierunkowych
user_125718 (2024-05-26 19:28:33+00:00): Lies mal
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours
und 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:phone

Grüße
Fabian
geojunkie (2024-06-02 11:19:45+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis - sorry, konnte nicht früher darauf reagieren. Habe gesehen, dass Du die Korrekturen schon selbst vorgenommen hast.

Grüße
Jürgen
InfosReseaux (2024-03-12 10:54:44+00:00): Bonjour Myosotis

Pourquoi avoir passé la Piste de la grand Roche en tertiary ?
C'est à peine goudronné, et surtout voie de service pour EDF principalement.

Bonne journée
Genépél (2024-03-12 17:55:17+00:00): Bonjour infos réseaux, 

Cette piste est au début goudronnée et c'est un itinéraire touristique vers le lac de Bissorte. Très empruntée printemps été automne donc. 

Si tu veux plus de détails je suis là !

Bonne soirée 

M A
InfosReseaux (2024-03-13 09:19:34+00:00): Bonjour

Je connais bien cette piste, pour l'emprunter régulièrement.
J'ai du mal à la considérer comme tertiary, unclassified s'y prêtait mieux je pense.
Tertiary serait valable si on pouvait aller jusqu'à Valménier sur une route du même gabarit et ce n'est pas le cas.
marczoutendijk (2024-02-08 09:28:17+00:00): What is "jjw" supposed to indicate?

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
Vincent Lafeychine (2024-02-12 12:44:38+00:00): Bonjour,
J'ai supprimé le nœud "GPMB" de la relation "Garonne".
Cependant, je ne trouve pas de nœud/relation pouvant correctement représenter le quai "InVivo": Avez-vous  une relation/nœud auquel le nœud "GPMB" pourrait être rattaché ?
JackGilmore (2024-07-13 13:26:24+00:00): Hi. Just to make you aware. The buildings that you added within the demolition area (way 1161099185) were demolished last year. I've corrected this and removed the buildings again in changeset 153893436
Leo Slager (2024-02-03 10:47:14+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Leo Slager (2024-02-03 10:49:37+00:00): OpenStreetMap is sterk internationaal ge-orienteerd. Het telefoonnummer behoort dan ook in het internationale format vermeld te worden.
Ik pas het even aan.
marczoutendijk (2024-02-08 09:27:57+00:00): What is "oow" supposed to indicate?

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
martinst (2024-02-03 16:10:22+00:00): Achtung, der Bayernatlas ist keine erlaubte Datenquelle für OSM!
Bitte entferne alles was Du daraus entnommen hast.
martinst (2024-02-04 19:27:29+00:00): Revertiert mit Changeset: 147065457
Sakari_N (2025-05-05 11:09:31+00:00): I reverted creation of area with gibberish in the tag fields.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165840194
Sandal man (2024-02-06 21:27:43+00:00): Thanks for editing the OSM, but In the future, can you give a slightly better description than just "add some points"?

And also a source
Regards Janus
Bienson (2024-02-04 01:43:39+00:00): Da die Pizzeria ja nicht das gesamte Gebäude einnimmt, sollte sie als POI eingetragen sein:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147039021
herr_taschenbier (2024-02-04 08:02:04+00:00): Klar, danke.
woodpeck (2024-03-21 10:32:21+00:00): Hello, please do not assign a "name" of "byggnad" to buildings; you have already set the object type to building, that's enough. Only use "name" if the building actually has a name! Same for "Infart".