piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Đuro Jiří (2023-03-15 08:14:36+00:00): Chiedo spiegazioni, perché sono effettuati questi cambiamenti. Io ho migliorato tutto paese Tarifa secondo immagini satellitari Esri World Imagery (cioè edifici, strade,parchi, panchine, cestini, attività commerciali,erba, monumenti,...). Dopo ho verificato in persona tutto sul posto e effettuato ulteriori miglioramenti. Unico che rimasto è dividere edifici nel centro storico, contorni ho mappato bene.
Ora stai "distruggendo" correzioni giusti.
Supaplex (2023-03-17 06:17:12+00:00): Hi,

你不小心拖到公館這邊人行道的點，黏到台大的校舍了
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133606965
Đuro Jiří (2023-03-13 04:39:48+00:00): Veoma loše mapovane zgrade. Ja sam je mapovao kao jednu zgradu, što nije idealno,ali mnogo bolje od toga što bylo prije i to što si vratio.
Đuro Jiří (2023-03-13 07:57:31+00:00): Restauracije "Café Central" sada izgleda mapovana na loši lokaciji.
Đuro Jiří (2023-03-15 08:14:23+00:00): Chiedo spiegazioni, perché sono effettuati questi cambiamenti. Io ho migliorato tutto paese Tarifa secondo immagini satellitari Esri World Imagery (cioè edifici, strade,parchi, panchine, cestini, attività commerciali,erba, monumenti,...). Dopo ho verificato in persona tutto sul posto e effettuato ulteriori miglioramenti. Unico che rimasto è dividere edifici nel centro storico, contorni ho mappato bene.
Ora stai "distruggendo" correzioni giusti.
iigmir (2023-03-16 13:45:54+00:00): 關聯（Relation）對辨認學校很重要。刪掉會對地圖顯示造成顯著影響。
Đuro Jiří (2023-03-13 04:39:36+00:00): Veoma loše mapovane zgrade. Ja sam je mapovao kao jednu zgradu, što nije idealno,ali mnogo bolje od toga što bylo prije i to što si vratio.
Đuro Jiří (2023-03-15 08:14:08+00:00): Chiedo spiegazioni, perché sono effettuati questi cambiamenti. Io ho migliorato tutto paese Tarifa secondo immagini satellitari Esri World Imagery (cioè edifici, strade,parchi, panchine, cestini, attività commerciali,erba, monumenti,...). Dopo ho verificato in persona tutto sul posto e effettuato ulteriori miglioramenti. Unico che rimasto è dividere edifici nel centro storico, contorni ho mappato bene.
Ora stai "distruggendo" correzioni giusti.
Đuro Jiří (2023-03-13 04:39:27+00:00): Veoma loše mapovane zgrade. Ja sam je mapovao kao jednu zgradu, što nije idealno,ali mnogo bolje od toga što bylo prije i to što si vratio.
Đuro Jiří (2023-03-13 07:54:03+00:00): Correos non occupa intero edificio. Anche adesso è mappato due volte.
Đuro Jiří (2023-03-15 08:13:49+00:00): Chiedo spiegazioni, perché sono effettuati questi cambiamenti. Io ho migliorato tutto paese Tarifa secondo immagini satellitari Esri World Imagery (cioè edifici, strade,parchi, panchine, cestini, attività commerciali,erba, monumenti,...). Dopo ho verificato in persona tutto sul posto e effettuato ulteriori miglioramenti. Unico che rimasto è dividere edifici nel centro storico, contorni ho mappato bene.
Ora stai "distruggendo" correzioni giusti.
catdreamer (2023-03-13 11:58:56+00:00): 這是公眾使用的開源地圖，請勿標示私人註記
catdreamer (2023-03-13 11:58:38+00:00): 這是公眾使用的開源地圖，請勿標示私人註記
catdreamer (2023-03-13 11:58:25+00:00): 這是公眾使用的開源地圖，請勿標示私人註記
mavl (2023-04-25 09:11:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
Warin61 (2023-04-24 23:54:48+00:00): Hi,

What the DCS Base Map shows is the river bank .... What the imagery shows is that the river is 'intermittent'. I don't think 'wetland' is what is here.
TobyOrr (2023-04-25 06:31:17+00:00): Hello Warin61

I agree that the DCS NSW Base Map shows this area as water but that map is not always correct and, as I recall reading in a recent post on talk-au, we don't want OSM to be just a copy of the Base Map. When I looked at satellite imagery from various sources I could see little water. I agree that there is sometimes water there but it seems to me that surface water is so infrequent in this stream (unlike other streams in the vicinity) that natural=wetland better describes the actual situation. 

I have been researching water in the Lachlan and Murrumbidgee areaa as a personal interest. One significant document published a couple of decades ago, "A history of the ecology and flows of the lower Lachlan River and its distributaries" from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324559709 (author was Patrick Donald Driver of NSW Department of Planning, Industry and Environment, dated January 1999) does not even mention Coolyamba Creek. This creek does not carry the more significant water that appears in nearby waterways such as Merrowie and Merrimajeel Creeks. I have visited the area and travelled on Alma Road and Cobb Highway but I have no recollection of anything significant at Coolyamba Creek.

As I said above, I do not see the DCS Base Map as always accurate. Natural=wetland was my best judgement for the area along Coolyamba Creek. I'm doing my best but you are possibly more experienced and better informed than me. If you think it best to re-map these areas as intermittent water, then please do so.

Thanks for contacting me.
TobyOrr (2023-04-25 07:00:34+00:00): Having posted the above, I realise that Coolyamba Creek is not actually a distributary of the Lachlan and carries just a limited volume of water from its own limited catchment area. Therefore its omission from the abovementioned publication is because it does not flow from the Lachlan. But this also probably explains why it has so little water compared with other nearby waterways.
Warin61 (2023-04-25 07:42:13+00:00): A 'wetland' in OSM is usually wet .. this one would be seldom wet... I think it is a riverbank .. with the tag intermittent=yes.
TobyOrr (2023-04-25 08:30:02+00:00): I think we have different understandings for the use of the tag "wetland". It is my understanding that wetland does not need always to be wet - especially in the Australian content. Gwyder wetlands and Macquarie Marshes are both intermittent in nature, as are many other wetland areas. 

I found two OSM definitions for wetland:
1. "A natural area subject to inundation or with waterlogged ground, further specified with wetland=*" source: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:natural

2. "A wetland is a land area that is saturated with water, either permanently or seasonally." source: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural=wetland

Referring to the first definition, an area subject to inundation will be wet when inundated but will not always be wet. The extent and duration of inundation and subsequent period of damp or bogginess varies depending on many factors. 

 And the second definition also makes it clear that the saturation with water does not need to be permanent. 

I believe that most wetland in Australia is intermittently wet rather than always so. 

It seems to me that wetlands are less frequently covered with water than rivers and lakes and, depending on the interval between rainfall/inundation events, wetlands, rivers and lakes may all become dry for a period.
Warin61 (2023-04-25 09:45:38+00:00): In that area of the world ..  when it rains it all gets wet :) creeks, rivers, roads etc. 

Looking at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wetland there is not much that matches what happens out here. I have mapped and area in SA as wetland .. but with the tag intermittent=yes. I' use that tag here on any 'natural' water feature except a bore.
TobyOrr (2023-04-26 00:48:20+00:00): Hello again Warin61
Thanks for your thoughts. Since I have considered wetlands as being usually intermittent, I have not considered it necessary to add an intermittent tag. The intermittent nature of many wetland areas is probably the reason why the intermittent tag does not render on the map when used for wetland.
As I said previously, I gave a lot of thought to mapping Coolyamba Creek and concluded that the areas along the waterway were most accurately mapped as wetland but I would not object if you think I have erred and you wish to change the way I have mapped the area.
Regards
TobyOrr
Warin61 (2023-05-04 08:08:42+00:00): I have found the DCS Base Map to be very usefull. And accurate to a great degree. 
If you think that an intermittent river bed is a wetland .. so be it.
Hufkratzer (2023-03-13 23:19:15+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1153936122
looks like an outdoor arena on bing,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1153936123
looks like a round pen.
Arenas and round pens are usually tagged leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian and not leisure=horse_riding; compare
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dhorse_riding
I don't know what https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1153938136 is. Is it an arena too?
marczoutendijk (2025-09-23 18:17:02+00:00): Hoi Kogacarlo,

Je gebruikt building=anchorage

wereldwijd wordt dat maar 10 keer gebruikt (door jou),
Wat is precies de betekenis?

Groet,
Marc
Kogacarlo (2025-10-01 10:56:51+00:00): Ha Marc. Dat betekent dat ze daar ankers hebben gebouwd om die mast rechtop te houden. Groetjes,
marczoutendijk (2025-10-01 18:40:51+00:00): En heb je dat ook vastgelegd in een wiki oid. zodat anderen dat ook begrijpen?
Kogacarlo (2025-10-05 12:56:50+00:00): Het valt in dezelfde categorie als building=wall die ik gebruikte als er bijvoorbeeld een coupure in een vestingwal zit en vrijwel altijd is de coupure gemaakt met metselwerk. De building-tag zorgt er voor dat deze dingen veelal gerenderd worden als "verharding" en dat is mijn bedoeling. Ik map niet meer dus ik ga geen tijd steken in wiki of dergelijke.
marczoutendijk (2025-10-05 14:00:57+00:00): Ben je definitief gestopt met mappen?
Dat zou jammer zijn, want je bijdragen voegden goede zaken toe aan OSM.
Warin61 (2023-03-13 22:04:11+00:00): Similar issue here 

Way are not in sequence order.

For other errors see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=151.28155&lat=-33.84362&zoom=9&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=ptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes%2Cptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes

For basic hints on PTv2 see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Warin61/diary/45106
map per (2023-03-13 06:24:18+00:00): Hallo Onon123,

du hast eine Postfiliale zur öffentlichen OpenStreetMaps Datenbank hinzugefügt (vgl. (1)). Weißt du auch noch welche Firma dort ist? DHL, Hermes, ...?

Danke und viele Grüße
map per

(1) https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10731980105/history
map per (2023-03-20 05:50:49+00:00): Ich glaube nicht, das es dort wirklich eine Post gibt und hab den Eintrag (1) deshalb erst mal aus der Karte rausgenommen.

Viele Grüße
map per
Warin61 (2023-03-13 22:00:18+00:00): Hi,
This does not meet the PTv2 rules... 

Does not start with the stops.

Role 'stop' is not used for stops.

Are the stops in sequenced order?
Are way in sequence order?
emersonveenstra (2023-03-13 12:19:13+00:00): Hi,

Looks like you forgot to change the "turn:lanes" tag when you reduced the lane count on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25507719. Would you mind fixing that? Thanks!
Frans S (2023-03-13 09:43:40+00:00): Hello.  I reviewed this changeset as well.
A few remarks. 
Don't cluster buildings.
Don't include the shadow into a mapping
Be more accurate , special at corners.
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133609003
MxxCon (2023-03-14 05:06:15+00:00): Hello.
Could you please elaborate what are you mapping here?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133609155
Frans S (2023-03-13 09:40:37+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133609278
Frans S (2023-03-13 09:41:17+00:00): More info:
About mapping of tall apartment blocks

Mapping of tall buildings differs from standard buildings. Because the imagery is taken at an angle, you see both the rooflines and also the side of a building. 
How do you map such a building?
Map over the rooflines and lastly slide the mapped building to the footprint.
Please adjust wrong positioned buildings as well
This video shows how that is done.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1V5-bADsYiffCD9bo6l64YOdTvmKqMGry/view?usp=share_link

And.... don't forget to square each rectangular building.

Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133609278
mavl (2023-04-25 09:11:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
Atal Hikr (2023-05-21 11:51:15+00:00): Mi scuso per l'intromissione ma, se non interpreto male la documentazione di OSM, il tag "name" serve per indicare il nome proprio di un oggetto, non per descriverlo o indicarne una caratteristica. "Traccia in cresta" è piuttosto una descrizione di un sentiero. C'è il tag "description" apposta per questo, inoltre si può specificare il grado di difficoltà secondo la scala svizzera (con il tag "sac_scale") e la visibilità del percorso (con il tag "trail_visibility"). Questo per quanto riguarda l'aspetto formale. 
Nella sostanza, non c'è alcun sentiero su quella cresta, ci sono solo in alcuni punti tracce di passaggio di animali. Almeno fino a novembre del 2022, data del mio sopralluogo. 
Mi rendo conto che è una questione soggettiva, ma non mi sembra opportuno inserire come sentiero un percorso simile, prima di tutto perché non c'è un sentiero (ragione già sufficiente, a mio modo di vedere), poi per una questione di pericolosità, aspetto che in questo caso è rilevante perché si passa praticamente sul ciglio della frana. Teniamo presente che, per la maggior parte  delle app di navigazione, ogni sentiero di OSM appare come tutti gli altri sentieri. E' un problema di rendering che ha impatti sulla sicurezza. La traccia di un percorso come questo, io la terrei nel mio archivio privato, ed eventualmente la scambierei a richiesta con altri appassionati di cui conosco capacità e attitudini e non la farei visualizzare come un sentiero su un sito pubblico e su app che possono essere usate da chiunque.
Peter:D (2023-05-21 15:19:47+00:00): Ciao Atal, non sò chi ha inserito questi sentieri su OSM. Io mi sono limitato ad assegnare loro il grado T4, proprio per evitare che potessero mettere in difficoltà qualcuno, perlomeno chi utilizza un app adatta a vedere queste differenze. Bisognerebbe capire chi è l'autore della traccia...
Atal Hikr (2023-05-21 17:13:48+00:00): Ciao Peter, ho consultato la cronologia delle modifiche e ho visto che l'inserimento non è opera tua. Ho contattato l'autore della traccia e gli ho espresso le medesime considerazioni.
Riguardo al T4, va bene distinguere, ma la scala delle difficoltà si applica comunque ad un sentiero (highway=path), non ad un generico percorso.
Se, risalendo una cresta in modalità "ravanage", trovo ogni tanto dei tratti in cui gli animali hanno schiacciato dell'erba o creato un varco tra i rododendri, non è un sentiero ma semplicemente un percorso possibile...
Soshal Distan Singh (2023-03-23 04:22:19+00:00): Добрый день.

>https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1152963010
>https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1153955926

1) Не нужно amenity и там и там, только на территории: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Один_объект_-_один_элемент_OSM
2) Не childcare, а kindergarten: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dkindergarten
3) addr:housenumber=3к3
Почитайте про синтаксис в адресах (не хватает пробела): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Адреса#Нумерация_домов

4)
>https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1028869134/history
>Проектируемый проезд №1

Не надо такое в name: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:name
Soshal Distan Singh (2023-03-23 04:58:28+00:00): 5)
>https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1054683657
>снесено напрочь
>demolished=yes

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:demolished=yes

"This feature has been labeled as deprecated. The recommended replacement is: demolished:building=yes"
Komrus (2023-03-23 07:20:33+00:00): По пп 1-5 - подправил. 
Хотя по п.1 - ситуация более сложная. Общая территория стройплощадки - на несколько объектов. 
Территория дет.сада будет КАКОЙ-ТО другой. Поэтому и вешал отметку "дет.садик" на здание (с ним более определённая ситуация). 
После окончания строительства - надо территорию детсада будет выделять по факту/снимкам. 
На второй части стройплощадки - будет строиться что-то ещё. (по факту - стройка пока не началась)
Soshal Distan Singh (2023-03-23 19:55:48+00:00): >https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1054683657
>building=yes
>demolished:building=yes

Эти теги не должны быть вместе: demolished:building=yes нужно оставить, а building=yes убрать. Здание перестанет рендериться для конечных потребителей, но информация для других маперов останется на месте (в этом и смысл).

>Общая территория стройплощадки - на несколько объектов.

Если стройплощадку детсада пока нельзя выделить, то и подписывать не обязательно. Стройка и стройка, какая разница. Можно было просто добавить к зданию детсада тег construction=kindergarten.
Если охота заморочиться, то границу участка детсада (а также геометрию здания) можно взять в РГИС: https://rgis.spb.ru/mapui?location=37816 (но в браузерном iD редакторе это всё равно неудобно делать).
Komrus (2023-03-24 06:56:38+00:00): Хм, интересно - а что там вообще в РГИС нарисовано?

Мне казалось, что зданию присваивают кадастровый номер только после получения разрешения на ввод.
Это не так, получается?

По этому участку на сайте Госстройнадзора 
(https://lkexpertiza.spb.ru/Reestr/ReestrRazrVvod) - не вижу никаких разрешений на ввод.

Среди разрешений на строительство виднеется разрешение №78-003-0535-2022 на дет.садик- но на соседний участок (78:36:0005354:1981)...

(Не, я понимаю - застройщик обещал ДВА садика построить. Но пока картина по бумагам и в реале - не бьётся...)
Soshal Distan Singh (2023-03-25 18:00:10+00:00): >Мне казалось, что зданию присваивают кадастровый номер только после получения разрешения на ввод.
Это не так, получается?

Не знаю, но с детскими садами и школами я такое регулярно встречаю. Например:
https://rgis.spb.ru/mapui?location=37848
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/59.86225/30.22367

Школа и детсад уже в РГИС, а соседние многоэтажки ещё нет. Просто тип строения не указан и информация об участках ещё не обновлена.
Strubbl (2023-03-13 20:27:50+00:00): Hi mario1974, 

es wäre klasse, wenn du deinen Änderungssatzkommentar ausführlicher formulieren könntest, sodass andere Mapper auch verstehen, was du geändert hast oder warum.

Viele Grüße
ZLima12 (2024-07-25 18:35:06+00:00): Hello,

This change is incorrect. Since there are traffic lights, traffic in the circle does not always have the right of way, and thus junction=roundabout is not appropriate. junction=circular is indeed the correct tag here, which is how it was tagged before.

Best,
John
A_Prokopova_lyft (2024-07-26 11:12:04+00:00): Hello ZLima12,
I’m Anastasia. I'm an OSM communications specialist on the OSM mapping team at Lyft. 
Thank you for your message, and for catching this error!
I understand now that if the circular traffic must yield to any entering road, it is not a roundabout but a circular. 
Thanks for bringing this to our attention and correcting the inaccuracy.
Best regards!
Supaplex (2023-03-14 11:02:09+00:00): 鳳山中山公園
nyampire (2023-03-15 08:29:05+00:00): Thank you for contributing OpenStreetMap.
I've checked your edit, and it looks nice! Great!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133612190
Frans S (2023-03-14 09:27:51+00:00): Hello.
No need to map these tracks. Please read the instruction paragraph about tracks.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133612206
Aleksandar Matejevic (2023-03-13 11:33:14+00:00): Can you fix Gurah admin boundaries?
Aleksandar Matejevic (2023-03-13 11:35:14+00:00): Also Pagu and please check all unfinished ones, please
literan (2023-04-07 13:17:21+00:00): это же вы отрисовывали школу https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1153966497

тут вот пишут, что отрисовали вверх ногами https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3626471
solenoid jam (2023-04-08 08:19:13+00:00): Ну может быть, на схеме не понятно было как площадка вписана в окружение.  Сейчас поверну, и fixme поставлю.
А слой ПКК в JOSM можно вставить?
literan (2023-04-08 10:54:20+00:00): можно, но только с плясками и бубнами. какой-то сервер надо ставить на компьютер, который подменяет сертификат. И я так и не понял, linux must have or not
eggie (2023-03-14 14:32:51+00:00): Dag linux   Er is al een adresnode.. Dus beter daar je info op zetten. 
Bij monumentale kerken is het ook wel gebruikelijk om alle info op het gebouw zelf te zetten. Het zal dan als kerkgebouw renderen op de kaart. 
De info heb ik nu samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode. 
MVG
eggie
linuxrev (2023-03-14 14:55:09+00:00): Bedankt voor je uitleg en hulp. Ik leer bij.
Frans S (2023-03-13 09:39:26+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133613403
habi (2023-03-13 08:15:57+00:00): Sorry, da lag in JOSM noch eine 'alte' Änderung rum.
Eigentlich wollte ich nur den Boots-Steg in Baden als privat markieren, und nicht auch noch 'was in Bern ändern...
tomhukins (2023-03-16 20:54:05+00:00): Thank you for improving OpenStreetMap.  Aqueduct Cottage was a ruin when I last visited several years ago but https://www.derbyshirewildlifetrust.org.uk/news/derbyshire-wildlife-trust-invites-public-opening-restored-aqueduct-cottage suggests it isn't any more, so you might have added some of these new tags a little too late.