piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
jw543 (2025-04-26 17:44:47+00:00): Er staat (nog) geen officieel blauw verkeersbord. Enkel een groen bord (van de gemeente geloof ik) met in tekst uitleg over wat wel/niet toegestaan is. En daarop is dus aangegeven dat het een pad voor fietsers en voetgangers is. Er is geen scheiding tussen voetgangers en fietsers. 

Mijn doel met deze edit was om duidelijk te maken dat je hier ook kan fietsen, want het is nu enkel als voetpad aangegeven op de kaart
eggie (2025-04-26 17:51:18+00:00): Dat is in ieder geval gelukt. 😀

In OSM tagging is het dan highway=path
..surface=?
foot=yes
bicycle=yes
ralrei (2025-04-28 05:31:35+00:00): Schau mal in die Wiki Seite <Good Practice>.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice

Mappe keine vorübergehenden Ereignisse und Objekte temporärer Natur

Nur weil eine Kirmes stattfindet, sollte man nicht die Karte ändern.
Yannik leon (2025-04-28 17:17:08+00:00): Hallo ralrei,

ich habe das bereits im letzten Jahr genau so gemacht und es gab keinerlei Beschwerden oder Probleme.
Wichtig ist: Ich setze die Änderungen nach Ende des Ereignisses selbstverständlich wieder zuverlässig in den ursprünglichen Zustand zurück.

Wenn man die "Good Practice"-Seite sehr streng auslegt, dürfte man theoretisch auch keine länger andauernden Baustellen oder vergleichbare temporäre Einrichtungen abbilden. In der Praxis wird dies jedoch häufig gemacht, weil es den aktuellen Zustand für die Nutzer besser widerspiegelt.

Ich respektiere deinen Hinweis, möchte aber betonen, dass ich für mich eine verantwortungsvolle Vorgehensweise gefunden habe, die sich bewährt hat.
Daher werde ich es weiterhin so handhaben, wie ich es für sinnvoll halte.
Bitte verstehe das nicht als persönlichen Angriff, sondern als bewusste Entscheidung meinerseits.

Viele Grüße leon
b-jazz (2025-04-27 05:41:33+00:00): RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1381464169

Hello J,

You continue to map fairways and share the nodes on the outer edge of the green instead of excluding the green and sharing nodes on the border between the two. Please see my previous discussion and wiki links at http://osm.org/changeset/165348686.
If you have any questions, please reach out.
VA00 (2025-08-26 11:21:16+00:00): Poprawiłem nieco. Jeżeli wyraźnie widać 2 koleiny wyjeżdżone w trawie, to dajemy highway=track, tracktype=grade5. Path to raczej w sytuacji gdy jest 1 koleina, wyjeżdżona rowerem czy wydeptana pieszo. Wschodnia część drogi faktycznie trochę tak wygląda, ale już nie chciało mi się poprawiać. Trzeba też pamiętać o podłączeniu drogi do sąsiednich - jak nie ma połączeń to droga istnieje tylko w sensie wizualnym, żadna nawigacja jej nie widzi.
RDreher (2025-05-08 04:01:04+00:00): Well, I thought it was a part of the bank, and it didn't make sense for me to call a building-like structure an atm. I thought of it as a sort of exclave annex of the bank it's part of, but I guess this change makes sense.
JessAk71 (2025-05-08 04:33:18+00:00): Sounds good, currently it is there as a separate node for the atm itself and the separate building structure is just noted as a generic building canopy since its not really a full building. If there is a full service bank branch here as well that could be added where that structure is located on the property with or without a relation to this structure can go either way. Otherwise this looks ok as is.
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2025-04-26 18:47:57+00:00): Is the name really "not free"?
eggie (2025-04-26 19:28:15+00:00): Welkom bij OSM. 
Bedankt voor de bijdrage. 
De info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode.
MVG
eggie
yrtimiD (2025-04-26 21:55:46+00:00): Hello, this looks like political change not relevant to the state on the ground. Please prevent such changes in the future, otherwise your account will be banned.
yrtimiD (2025-04-26 22:04:14+00:00): Political vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165484229
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-27 01:05:35+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17586
AndyB_66 (2025-09-19 17:45:30+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
canfe (2026-04-13 17:02:48+00:00): lo leisure=slipway va mappato sul bordo dello specchio d'acqua
Grass-snake (2025-04-27 07:26:41+00:00): Здравствуйте, лучше не сокращать названия, например, вместо "Яблоневая ул." нужно указывать "Яблоневая улица";

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F
habi (2025-05-27 09:27:02+00:00): Ciao imagoiq
Here you've added `building=shelterd_housing`, which I also corrected to `building=apartements` with `amenity=sheltered_housing`
Happy mappiong,
habi
imagoiq (2025-05-30 08:12:20+00:00): Hi Habi,
I've added a couple of other buildings with this tag recently.

I'm not convinced that amenity=sheltered_housing is more suited to those type of building than the building key, but please try to convince me!

My thoughts: none of them have been accepted as a key or value. The only page that I could find is an abandoned proposal for amenity=sheltered_housing.
Looking at taginfo, building or residential = sheltered_housing seems slightly more popular (I added no more than 10 building with this tag myself).
In my opinion, it's very similar to building=dormitory (which is a de facto tag as well, but at least documented on the wiki). From what I understood, those are “normal” buildings but adapted for seniors or people with disabilities.

What do you think? Did I miss something?
habi (2025-06-02 20:18:02+00:00): Technically, I just corrected the typo `building=shelterd_housing`, but found the linked proposal on the OSM Wiki, and thought it sounded appropriate.

There's 64 buildings worldwide with the tag (https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=building%3Dsheltered) and 22 amenities with the tag (https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=amenity%3Dsheltered), so it seems sensible to add the "proper". building tag back.
Do you want to do this, or shall I?
imagoiq (2025-06-03 06:29:50+00:00): Yep, thanks for the typo. It would be nice if you can do it, I'm quite busy this week and the following
habi (2025-06-03 13:19:36+00:00): I put the value back in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167135318
infeeeee (2025-04-28 20:53:03+00:00): Szia!

Az ilyen kutakra van címkénk, fountain=bubbler

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:fountain%3Dbubbler
Petró Tamás (2025-04-29 07:30:48+00:00): köszi, javítottam!
habi (2025-05-27 09:16:05+00:00): Ciao imagoiq
Here you've added `building=shelted_housing` which seems like a typo (and only exists once in Switzerland).
I changed it to `building=apartements` and added https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Sheltered_Housing, OK?
Greetings,
habi
Joseph R P (2025-04-26 19:43:17+00:00): Please do not use Google content as a source. osm.wiki/Google
rle32795 (2025-04-26 18:39:05+00:00): Addendum on sources:
- used also MML aerial on drawing the small track
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:55:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
Glassman (2025-04-29 00:14:08+00:00): Why did you remove the cuisine=coffee_shop from Cherry Street Coffee House?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165478859
asc (2025-04-26 18:48:55+00:00): For more references, there is a CPTDB Wiki page for this terminal:
https://cptdb.ca/wiki/index.php/Grand_River_Transit_Highland_Hills_Mall_Terminal

I marked the terminal `disused=yes` but it might be worth considering either an abandoned tag, or removing it altogether.
SomeoneElse (2025-07-04 18:14:07+00:00): Hello,
If this is no longer a dentist then I guess the healthcare=dentist tag should also be removed?
Best Regards,
Andy
SmithyScotland (2025-07-04 19:00:35+00:00): I seem to remember this place looked long term shut, possibly a note on the window.  A few websites say the place is still open however in that location.  Not sure what the story is to be honest.
SmithyScotland (2025-07-04 19:03:21+00:00): Have crated a note and requested this building is checked

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4839193
SomeoneElse (2025-07-04 19:07:06+00:00): Thanks!
GeoVolunteer (2025-04-26 21:40:34+00:00): What is the surface type of the new path drawn?
eggie (2025-04-26 19:31:15+00:00): Dag René.. 
Je vraagt feedback.. 
Yep dat lijkt me wel een strakke actie. 

MVG
eggie
René Stout (2025-04-27 07:43:42+00:00): Hallo Eggie,
Mooi. Ik heb vroeger veel in Waze ge-edit. OSM lijkt me een betere keuze. Mooi editing systeem!
Groet, René
eggie (2025-04-26 19:32:52+00:00): Lijkt me oke... Vreemd dat zulke op de kaart komen.
Ook ervaren mappers maken foutjes.

MVG
eggie
Xvtn (2025-04-26 22:34:28+00:00): That trailhead never knew what hit it.
leftybender (2025-04-27 13:13:33+00:00): Heh. I did leave a couple of park benches (metal, black, blah blah) to lure future mappers....
Ltrlg (2025-11-07 10:14:20+00:00): Bonjour, dans le cadre d’une discussion en cours sur les objets ressemblant à des bornes incendie sans en être (ici : https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/fire-hydrant-vert-dans-wiki-osm/38744), je regardais les usages hors France de amenity=hydrant et je tombe sur ce changeset. Pourriez-vous me préciser la raison qui vous a fait utiliser `amenity`+`emergency` ici ?
Herr Bause (2025-12-18 17:12:20+00:00): Hallo,
du hast die Tiefgaragenzufahrt als building=garage eingetragen, da ja das Gebäude selber keine Garage ist, wäre ein passenderer Tag dafür building=parking_entrance. Habs aktualisiert.
Viele Grüße
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2025-04-30 01:25:36+00:00): Please attach speed cameras to the road.

Or create a maxspeed enforcement relation.

See:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dspeed_camera
NorthCrab_upload (2025-04-26 20:40:58+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10253667341

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
amosharper (2025-04-29 14:50:50+00:00): Please don't use the "name" key for building descriptions such as way 1381525736 "Three rear flats - Residential" or 1381665071 "Rear flats". Thanks.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name
Frans S (2025-05-23 10:38:47+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
A few remarks. 
Check the highway wiki to get an idea how to tag traces of paths/roads in this area
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa?source=post_page---------------------------
A footway is a dedicated path within towns or parks. Not here.
Tracks are also not to be tagged in this rural area.  (path or unclassified highway is better)
Best regards and keep mapping/
VictorIE (2025-04-28 00:22:52+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1381527121

There's a bunch of double-mapped buildings here. :)
b-jazz (2025-04-27 05:56:51+00:00): Hello Mlap,

Please make sure you share all of the nodes between a fairway and green and don't leave some of them unconnected. Doing that will leave odd gaps or possible even worse, overlaps. Thx.
ilias_ (2025-04-27 01:46:30+00:00): Hi, you named both relations LGV Tanger - Marrakech. On of them should be LGV Marrakech - Tanger, as it goes from Marrakech to Tanger
user_22463405 (2025-04-27 22:44:13+00:00): Hi,I made two relations: 
The first one is: LGV Tanger Marrakech from Tangier to Marrakesh and the second one is: LGV Tanger Marrakech from Marrakesh to Tangier 
Check it
ilias_ (2025-04-27 22:46:50+00:00): Yep, that's exactly what I said. But the second one has to be named LGV Marrakech - Tanger, as I said, because it goes from Marrakech to Tanger. You named it LGV Tanger - Marrakech.
user_22463405 (2025-05-04 13:28:21+00:00): I did it
ilias_ (2025-05-04 14:02:39+00:00): Thanks! Do trains in Morocco drive on the right or on the left? Because you named the one on the right Tanger-Marrakech and the one on the left Marrakech-Tanger, meaning the train drives on the left side. Sadly, I don't remember which side the train drives on, do you have more information?
user_22463405 (2025-05-04 20:58:21+00:00): Trains in Morocco drive on the left contrary to vehicles (cars, trucks, bikes...), but the tramway on the right like vehicles, you can go near to a random railway if you reside next to it and you will see.
Thank you for informing me to correct my mistake.
hatul (2025-10-23 20:04:10+00:00): שלום
מה הסיבה שהתסריט יצר תחנה חדשה
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12172512836
במקום להשתמש בתחנה הקיימת?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11346831438
(מחקתי את התחנה הישנה בגלל כפילות)
NeatNit (2025-10-24 19:01:48+00:00): היי,
שאלה טובה, לקח לי זמן להבין למה.
התיוג של התחנה הקיימת היה:

amenity=bus_station
bus=yes
public_transport=station

וזה תיוג שמתאים יותר לתחנה מרכזית (הייבוא עדיין לא טוב מאוד בתחנות מרכזיות). תחנת אוטובוס בודדת צריכה להיות מתויגת עם:

highway=bus_stop
public_transport=platform
bus=yes

ואם היא הייתה מתוייגת כך, הייבוא היה משתמש בה.

כנראה צריך לעשות חיפוש יותר יסודי לתחנות אוטובוס כאלה בארץ. חשבתי שעשיתי את זה, אבל כנראה פספסתי. תודה על ההודעה שלך!
NeatNit (2025-10-24 19:07:42+00:00): שכחתי לומר, מספיק אחד מהשניים:

highway=bus_stop

או

public_transport=platform
bus=yes

אבל כאמור, הם לא היו. הבלבול הוא נפוץ כי בעברית אומרים "תחנת אוטובוס" והתרגום הטבעי הוא "bus station", ולא "bus stop".
StC (2025-09-17 16:29:48+00:00): Hi!

Could you please share your sources for the French part of this Way? I somehow have doubts as to its name. Also, it would probably be cleaner to have separate relations for the French and the Dutch/Belgian parts because here the route operators are local associations.
Daan Vanderveken (2025-10-29 20:54:31+00:00): Hello, the source is the webpage mentioned in the source field of the change set. The web page contains the definition of the route by the operator on a Mapsmarker map and a downloadable gpx. We created the route upon request of the Belgian Compostela society, operator of the route. It's common that Compostela routes cross  borders (for example Via Scaldia, Via Brabantica, ... cross the Belgian/French border). That's how they are managed by the Compostela societies. Best regards, Daan
StC (2025-10-29 23:13:00+00:00): Hello!

Actually, here in France the routes are managed by local association who ask permission to local authorities to create the signposting. That is why we try to create one relation (or superrelation) per local operator.
Cheers,
St.
Daan Vanderveken (2025-11-06 18:38:19+00:00): Thank you for your comment. The Via Tenera route now stops at the Belgian/French border.
Cheers,
Daan
StC (2025-11-06 19:16:12+00:00): Thanks! Ideally we would find the operator for the French part of the routes, but I have no idea where to start searching. Maybe the Belgian Compostela society would know?
Daan Vanderveken (2025-11-06 20:34:37+00:00): I spoke with Vlaams Compostelagenootschap, the society that defined the Via Tenera. The Compostelagenootschap signposts and maintains the route up to the Belgian/French border. There  part in France is
Daan Vanderveken (2025-11-06 20:41:17+00:00): The part in France is not signposted and there are no plans to signpost it. The part in France is only defined to help the pilgrims (on a leaflet or with gpx) to connect to Via Scaldea. So we can leave the mapping like it is now.
StC (2025-11-07 08:49:44+00:00): OK, very clear thanks. This is the gray area that can become very sensitive sometimes: the difference between "virtual routes" and "signposted routes", which can lead to a significant amount of friction on the ground (commercial interests, private properties, etc). The current consensus in the OSM Outdoors community in France is to take advantage of the general consistency between "observable on the ground" and "sanctioned by local authorities", and not map "virtual routes" except when they are very obviously supported by local authorities.
Thanks again!
cw_25 (2025-05-03 17:52:56+00:00): Please delete this track. The inner roads of Wingertsäcker 84-132 are on private ground and therefore should not be mapped (especially not via cycling across and taking pictures from kids and adults in private gardens)
b-jazz (2025-04-27 05:33:06+00:00): RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19036918

Hello Green. Thanks for cleaning up the boundary between the fairway and green. That looks much better. You should know though that when you removed the fairway from the multipolygon, you left a dangling relation with a single member, which isn't quite right. Mapping around the tee was fine, but you need to make sure you leave the relations correct (or properly removed). You should also share the nodes at the boundary between the tee and fairway instead of a random sized gap between the two. Thanks.
eggie (2025-04-27 11:14:57+00:00): Welkom bij OSM.

Kleine aanpassing. De info samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode.
MVG
eggie
marczoutendijk (2025-04-27 02:20:33+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/8568965
Aber hier heißt es immer noch access=no, und das bedeutet, dass niemand diese Brücke überqueren kann!
0xb7767000 (2025-04-27 18:57:02+00:00): Danke!
Branko Kokanovic (2025-04-28 20:03:23+00:00): Боројевића, а не Бојовића? Vidim da si smanjio ovo slovo "B", ali deluje da je Borojevica?
AntMadeira (2025-04-27 00:16:36+00:00): Olá, docthedog.
Podes informar por que razão mudaste Santa Maria de Sardoura de town para village?

Cumprimentos,
António Madeira.
AntMadeira (2025-05-12 20:17:49+00:00): Sem resposta há duas semanas, restabeleci a correta denominação deste place para town, uma vez que se trata de uma vila.
Andreas Binder (2025-04-27 07:22:55+00:00): Ich denke, dass diese Änderung aufgrund der Meldunghttps://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4318781 entstanden ist. An dieser Stelle befindet sich immer noch unverändert Buttlers. Wie der anonyme Melder auf die Idee kommt  Mountain Shop Iko hätte Buttlers ersetzt, ist mir schleierhaft. Der Mountain Shop Iko ist zwei Läden weiter (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2292337171). Könntest Du  Buttlers wiederherstellen?
Andreas Binder (2025-04-30 17:18:53+00:00): Änderung, die aufgrund dieser anonymen Falschmeldung entstanden ist, rückgängig gemacht
osm.org/changeset/165644367
Romwriter (2025-04-27 09:25:30+00:00): Hallo smarties, vielen Dank für Deine Beiträge. Eine Rückfrage: Was meinst Du mit dem Tag "status=complete"? Beste Grüße, Romwriter
smarties (2025-04-29 17:20:02+00:00): Hallo Romwriter, früher haben wir damit gekennzeichnet das dass NSG komplett eingezeichnet ist. Da hat man schonmal ein paar Monate gebraucht für z.B. die Lüneburger Heide.
balint36 (2025-07-03 06:18:31+00:00): Naszály út nem számít "belső főútnak". Én KÖu-4-ként látom, ami helyi gyűjtőút.
Kilencfarku Macska (2025-07-03 12:40:53+00:00): KÖu-4-re pont hogy "Tertiary"-t ad meg:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hungary/F%C5%91%C3%BAt
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-08 16:29:37+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12790442039/history has shop = landscaping that was added in this edit
shop=landscaping ? What kind of shop, if any is here? Is it selling landscaping supplies? Or is it office of someone providing landscaping services? Or is it something else?
Lieckio (2026-02-08 23:52:49+00:00): Excellent question! This was done when I wasn't quite sure about the tagging (still am not, but more than back then!). It's a business that does landscaping.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-10 09:49:49+00:00): Is it their internal company office?

Warehouse/storage?

Place where clients walk in to arrange services?

All/some of above?
Lieckio (2026-02-11 21:26:10+00:00): Looks like an office, but I don't know further than that. It also seems they might have moved.
ivanbranco (2025-04-27 14:01:42+00:00): Ciao Emabarto,

per gli import bisogna seguire delle linee guida specifiche, vedi: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Import/Guidelines
non mi pare nessuno di questi step sia stato seguito, avrebbero evitato alcuni problemi, ad esempio:

festivi=esclusi - I tag solitamente sono in inglese britannico. Inoltre questa informazione penso avrebbe dovuto fare parte piuttosto del tag fee:conditional=* con la sintassi PH (public Holiday).

ref:rate=* cosa significa? Il tag non é documentato

stop_type=promisque cosa significa? Il tag non é documentato

zcs=2 cosa significa? Il tag non é documentato

Come qualcuno ha fatto notare su Telegram, opening_hours=* sul parcometro non é propriamente corretto, quei valori dovrebbero essere piuttosto fee:conditional=* sui parcheggi.

Hai verificato i doppioni? Ad esempio, qua ci sono davvero due parcometri a nove metri di distanza o sono lo stesso? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12790523922 e https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8059401043

Io sarei per annullare l'import e riproporlo seguendo le linee guida.
Emabarto (2025-04-27 14:14:26+00:00): Si concordo su annullare l'import e ripeterlo diversamente
Emabarto (2025-04-27 14:19:35+00:00): ref_rate: sarebbe la sigla della tariffa
zcs: area del centro storico
stop_type: Promiscua – stalli di colore blu con segnaletica verticale a 2 pannelli, sosta a pagamento
Emabarto (2025-04-27 14:19:57+00:00): i doppioni l'avevo verificati anche con streetview
rickmastfan67 (2026-06-09 10:34:55+00:00): Do you have any photographic proof that a 'I-57 Business' route was signed?  No AASHTO approval was given for such a route.
Xvtn (2025-04-28 15:54:56+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OSM! Thanks for your many recent contributions. StreetComplete is a great way to add lots of detail when out walking around. Let me know if you have any questions, and happy mapping!
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:55:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
MxxCon (2025-04-28 20:07:30+00:00): Hello.
Please note that "construction_start=" is not a valid OSM tag.
Additionally, "building:flats=" and "building:levels=" tags without "building=" tag creates invalid object.
Also, "height_ft=" is not a valid OSM tag and no data consumer will read or use it. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:height  documents how to properly record height of features.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165485931
JozefM (2025-04-29 04:55:16+00:00): Hi, thanks for the message;
The site is a residential tower under construction and will be completed in 2027;
I have recorded the stories and flats that the building will have once completed when the polygon can be converted into a building;
Regarding the key "height_ft", have switched to the key "height";
There doesn't seem to be a key to record "consruction_start", neither "start_date" nor "opening_date" are suitable to record this information. Do you have any suggestions on how to record this data? Maybe into the key "Note".
Thanks again.
MxxCon (2025-04-29 15:46:03+00:00): note= key is intended to help inform other mappers about something, such as help disambiguate some complicated map situation, it's not really intended to encode information.

I encountered such situations a couple of times, but in OSM there's no tag to explicitly record "start of construction". Luckily active constructions last 2-3 years so such a tag won't be relevant for too long.

You could tag this whole thing as building under construction, and then update its shape as construction progresses and satellite imagery gets updated. Or add floors and units info once the building is done.
CoyKoi (2025-04-28 02:10:11+00:00): Hi Damian, welcome to OSM and thanks for your edit. You have flagged 'review requested' so I took a look at this changeset. Your change was good, reflecting that the future starting date of this highway has changed from 2026 to 2028. You left an informative changeset comment. The only improvement I could suggest would be to include a link to a source for the new date you have selected: the project page or a news article. This could be pasted into the 'Sources' field when you save the changeset.
Cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165485955