piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2023-04-23 15:53:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:09:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:04:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:48:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:48:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:48:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:50:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
maciek-szn (2023-02-23 11:26:15+00:00): Dlaczego została usunięta nazwa opisana w rejestrze TERYT wraz z tagiem wskazującym na źródło tej nazwy? Proszę przywrócić do stanu poprzedniego.
maciek-szn (2023-02-23 11:27:18+00:00): Zwracam też uwagę, że istnieje punkt adresowy Autostrada 25.
maciek-szn (2023-02-23 11:31:19+00:00): Pozwoliłem sobie samodzielnie wycofać zmianę.
Tomek | Yanosik (2023-02-23 11:44:09+00:00): To może lepiej byłoby dać "Autostrada" w description albo alt_name? Obecne oznaczenie nie wygląda na prawidłowe.
pio2_122 (2023-02-23 11:57:28+00:00): Z jakiej racji urzędowa, oznakowana w terenie nazwa (https://goo.gl/maps/WaZYsHxoXhGPV9zo7) z którą powiązany jest także punkt adresowy miałaby nie być umieszczona w tagu name?

W description można by co najwyżej umieścić obszerny opis tego co powyżej, aby podobne sytuacje mapowania w ciemno się więcej nie powtórzyły, choć zapewne i tak przez niektórych zostałoby to zignorowane tak jak już obecny znacznik source:name=TERYT...
Tomek | Yanosik (2023-02-23 12:19:50+00:00): To proszę taki opis zrobić w description. Poza tym, to co w name też musi być jakoś dostosowane do rzeczywistości. Do opisu tego way'a (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/36786508) lepsze jest A6 czy Autostrada?
pio2_122 (2023-02-23 12:53:20+00:00): Opis dodany w description, note:name i source:name.

Niezbyt rozumiem ostatnie zdanie - numer i kategoria drogi a nazwa drogi to zupełnie odrębne sprawy. Na przykład, w woj. wielkopolskim urzędową nazwę ul. Autostrada ma fragment DK 92 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/302269315). Tam także są adresy związane z tą nazwą (np. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3140113270).
RicoElectrico (2023-02-26 22:23:46+00:00): Coś mi się wydaje, że ta nazwa Yanosikom się nie podoba, bo nawigacja pewnie wymienia drogę z nazwy zamiast ref-a, prawda?
Woazboat (2023-02-24 11:06:58+00:00): Hallo, du hast hier die Straßenkategorie von einigen wichtigen Straßen in Graz heruntergesetzt. War das mit der lokalen Community abgesprochen bzw. was ist der Grund für diese Änderungen?

lg, Woazboat
Woazboat (2023-02-24 11:13:37+00:00): Diskussion hier fortgeführt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132920258
osmviborg (2023-02-23 11:19:08+00:00): 'place=hamlet' til den størrelse by https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place=hamlet
maxielf (2023-02-23 11:26:37+00:00): In Denmark this is a city because it has citysigns and the name is Øster Starup not Egeland.
osmviborg (2023-02-23 11:20:36+00:00): Gravens er 'place=suburb', bydel i Ågård.
thopf (2023-02-23 12:37:11+00:00): Hallo! Auf welchen Grundlagen / Quellen beruhen diese Änderungen?
southern_cyclist (2023-02-23 12:59:40+00:00): Hallo! Basis ist die Unterscheidung zwischen Landes- und Gemeindestraßen, so wie sie auch im digitalen Atlas Steiermark ersichtlich sind. Die Straßen aus dem Änderungssatz sind allesamt Gemeindestraßen (waren es immer oder wurden es) und können daher entsprechend dem Wiki-Eintrag nicht unter primary oder secondary fallen.
Woazboat (2023-02-24 11:13:19+00:00): Habe ursprünglich hier kommentiert aber werde das jetzt hier weiterführen

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132919460

Die Einstufung im digitalen Atlas Steiermark ist für die Straßenkategorie in OSM hier irrelevant. Der `highway=*` tag wird durch die Relevanz der Straßen für den Verkehr bestimmt.
Woazboat (2023-02-25 22:12:00+00:00): Danke für's rückgängig machen
george1201 (2023-02-23 23:43:38+00:00): Und warum hast du den Apostroph nur bei "name" weggenommen, nicht bei "brand"?
woodpeck (2023-02-24 08:54:10+00:00): Äh, da hätt ich im ID runterscrollen müssen ;) jetzt gefixt! Ehrlich gesagt hab ich keine Ahnung wie die Marke eingetragen ist, aber am Laden steht definitiv kein Apostroph dran.
george1201 (2023-02-24 10:46:12+00:00): Ja, die scheinen ihren Namen überall "richtig" zu schreiben, im Gegensatz zu manch anderen, die auf dieses Apostroph nicht verzichten wollen.
ivanbranco (2023-02-25 18:38:02+00:00): Ciao michelis, benvenut su OSM

ho notato dei problemi in questa modifica:
- name=cascina la marchesa
su OSM utilizziamo le maiuscole all'inizio per convenzione, quindi "Corso Vercelli" e non "corso vercelli" ecc. In questo caso sarebbe stato "Cascina La Marchesa"

- description=https://www.museotorino.it/view/s/0015b8716a7f44e8b9bc79005583a2c8

qua hai usato il tag description per un link. Deve essere usato solo per descrizioni testuali. Per i link esiste "website=*" (siti ufficiali) o "url=*" (siti non ufficiali)

-wikipedia=it:https://www.museotorino.it/view/s/af341b1070234f4ca8fe7bd05567077c

il tag wikipedia serve per linkare pagine wikipedia, in questo caso è un sito terzo, quindi non va bene. Inoltre la cascina nel link si trova da tutt'altra parte, qual è l'attinenza (a parte il nome simile)?
fjavier_gr (2024-02-10 11:03:46+00:00): Hola,

He dibujado el trazado de la vía peatonal que cruza la autovía, y no tengo claro si este carril bici ya no va por aquí sino que formará parte del trazado peatonal.

Saludos.
osmviborg (2023-02-23 11:21:40+00:00): Adresser bruges ikke på hverken bygninger eller områder.
maxielf (2023-02-23 11:39:19+00:00): hvis du så kigger 2 bygninger længere til højre står den oplyst som virksomhedskontor, derfor jeg har valgt denne.
osmviborg (2023-02-23 11:44:47+00:00): Helt i orden, men brug venligst ikke adresse tags på bygninger.
maxielf (2023-02-23 11:47:51+00:00): ok men hvad skal jeg så bruge??
osmviborg (2023-02-23 12:01:49+00:00): Du skal ikke bruge noget. Der er et adressepunkt indenfor bygningspolygonen, det er adressen. Adressepunkterne skal man ikke røre ved, de bliver automatisk opdateret.
Ygramul (2023-02-25 09:44:00+00:00): Good morning. Thank you for adding your business to OpenStreetMap. Do now, however, that there are established tagging practices for things like addresses, opening hours and the kind of shop, When editing on the website you can search the presets and the editor will then also show suitable other information you can add.

I've corrected the information to the best of my knowledge from very afar; just something to keep in mind for the next time. If you want to further contribute to the map, especially locally, I can recommend the Android app StreetComplete (https://streetcomplete.app).
fabiotofy (2023-02-23 12:41:20+00:00): e sembra che il nome cambierà in "Porto Vivo"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132921331
alessandrocarmeli (2023-02-28 14:58:38+00:00): Chiedo scusa per l'errore non ho mai notato i vari indirizzi. Comunque porto vivio dovrebe essere il nome di un nuovo museo, mentre il viale nuovo (quello fatto assieme alla rotonda) dovrebbe avere un intitolazione, mente il piazzale fronte centrale idrodinamica doveva essere piazzale Ressel.
alessandrocarmeli (2023-02-28 15:00:14+00:00): ma essendo che in nomi non vanno messi su delle way con acess=x ma solo sulle principali, non andrebbe meglio mettere solo su quella che va dalla rotonda di viale miramare a largo santos?
damjang (2023-02-28 15:14:28+00:00): Anche si, ma a quel punto non va messo neanche il loc_name
aTarom (2023-02-23 13:59:29+00:00): Hola marineritu, gràcies per editar,
quina font uses per el nom del carrer? sembla que a la placa s'intueix una H, però no es veu gaire clar
https://www.bing.com/maps?cp=41.386918%7E2.052038&lvl=17.0&v=2&sV=1&style=x&dir=126.5&pi=4.8
De ser correcte la teva edició recorda canviar també el "name:ca"
Salutacions
marineritu (2023-02-23 14:44:24+00:00): Gràcies per l'apreciació. De fet a la placa sí surt Carrer del Mas Lluhí [sic], però fa referència a una manera arcaica. Tant al mapa del web de l'ajuntament de Sant Feliu com al visor del ICGF Vissir apareix la forma actual. Mas Lluí. Això ja va a gustos. Gràcies.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-24 06:54:14+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o miejscowości.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/337638072
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1148801589

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
aceman444 (2024-12-03 21:35:48+00:00): Preco presun nazvu vodarne len na budovu? A teraz ma aj cely areal man_made=waterworks aj samotna budova.
Vacsinou to davame na cely areal. Na budovu je mozne dat https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dpumping_station alebo pripadne dalsie vodarenske znacky.
moonraver (2024-12-04 08:50:48+00:00): Bol som v tom ze vodny zdroj je iba tam kde sa cerpa voda,nie cely areal.Je to opravene,opravim aj ostatne v okoli co som robil. otazka je ci TU nehat nazov Cerpacia stanica... na cely areal alebo len na tu budovu, asi na cely areal lebo sa tak vola,ci?
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-02-23 13:16:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 132925791 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for spam edit
Samuele Battarra (2023-02-25 18:51:51+00:00): Attenzione, hai spostato degli elementi che erano già posizionati correttamente, mi riferisco ad esempio all'aiuola della rotonda al distributore. Tra l'altro ora l'aiuola non è più centrata con la rotonda.
SimonTheGolds (2023-02-25 22:52:43+00:00): Hai ragione. Ti spiego: avevo disegnato la zona Vulcangas tempo fa, con le immagini satellitari vecchie. Da poco sono state sostituite ed è tutto leggermente spostato. Ho ri-centrato sulle nuove immagini l'aiuola e avrei fatto lo stesso anche con le strade. A proposito, è giusto ri-spostare tutto o bisogna attenersi alla vecchia "griglia"?
Samuele Battarra (2023-02-26 14:10:43+00:00): Ciao, l'ideale è disegnare gli elementi nell'effettiva posizione in cui sono.
Il problema è che questa posizione non è quella indicata dalle immagini, ne le nuove, ne le vecchie.
Infatti tutte le immagini aeree sono affette, chi più chi meno, da uno spostamento rispetto alla posizione reale.
Possibili soluzioni:
-usare come sfondo le immagini pcn 2016, sono molto vecchie, ma al tempo erano considerate molto buone come posizionamento, eventualmente puoi usarle per riposizionare qualche elemento, come ad esempio l'aiuola di una rotonda o un campo sportivo, e poi usare questo elemento con la soluzione successiva;
-se ci sono elementi di cui sei certo abbiano la posizione corretta, puoi usarli per correggere l'offset delle immagini.
woodpeck_repair (2023-03-03 00:51:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 133232206, 133232218, 133232224, 133232227, 133232225, 133232208, 133232216, 133232213, 133232177, 133232229, 133232203, 133232220, 133232198, 133232180, 133232189, 133224701, 133232215, 133232214, 133232188, 133232199, 133232207, 133232205, 133232182, 133232222, 133232186, 133232200, 133232191, 133232223, 133232209, 133232169, 133232230, 133232194, 133232197, 133232210 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import with unclear licensing in Madagascar
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-24 06:54:12+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8660648781
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100749805

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Mazda05 (2023-02-25 15:17:22+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Russian–Ukrainian_war
martianfreeloader (2023-04-20 18:49:09+00:00): Hi,
Thanks for adding the sidewalks. When you do this, the correct way would be to

1) Add sidewalk=separate + foot=use_sidepath to the carriage way (or sidewalk=left or sidewalk=right if you map only the sidewalk on side)
2) Either consistently map or not map sidewalks in a neighbourhood of similar streets.

Happy mapping!
Mazda05 (2023-02-25 15:17:29+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Russian–Ukrainian_war
Mazda05 (2023-02-25 15:17:33+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Russian–Ukrainian_war
Mazda05 (2023-02-25 15:17:39+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Russian–Ukrainian_war
aceman444 (2024-12-02 23:34:37+00:00): No neviem, odstranite mi z toho prepadu vody building:levels=2 a potom tam date budovu na budovu, co je dost problemove.
moonraver (2024-12-03 16:04:27+00:00): osobne nemyslim, ze to, ze je nieco betonove, je automaticky budova, aj ked kataster to tak casto dava. Jedina budova co tam je, je ta vrchna a ta nema ziadne poschodie.K nej smeruje most a pod mostom a budovou je len betonovy prepad vody. Ale ak poviete, ze ta budova je 2 podlazna, kludne to dajme naspat ako to bolo. (v tomto pripade ta budova nema ani 1 podlazie podla wiki) Toto co tam je teraz sa mi tiez nepaci, preto teda navrhujem vyrobit tam man_made=bridge na celu cestu+ta budova vacsia a nad nou nehat building=yes+layer=1 ak treba na tu budovu mensiu (ktora je jedina budova tam). Pozeral som CR a SK niektore priehrady a maju tam casto len: builidng=yes + layer=1 a cesta k budovam je len highway + bridge=yes
moonraver (2024-12-03 16:05:20+00:00): inak fotky su na freemap.sk
moonraver (2024-12-05 08:39:08+00:00): upratal som tu budovu aj s cestou, teraz to zodpoveda realnemu stavu.Je tam este problem ta priehrada lebo sa krizi s cestami. Da sa to riesit pridanim layer=* ale osobne si netrufam.
Frans S (2023-04-04 13:39:31+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
There are quite a lot of multi storey buildings which need to be mapped on special way.
Map over the rooflines and move the whole to the footprint of that building
https://drive.google.com/file/d/18XrU8PzHfe_cYwQCmfZEO1kS1Ze-Y7gX/view?usp=share_link
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132924210
Frans S (2023-04-04 13:43:24+00:00): Hi. Another issue.
Please square each rectangular building with the Q key. 240 buildings on this task are not squared properly !
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132924210
eggie (2023-02-23 17:19:53+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-23 17:13:25+00:00): You requested a review.

Looks ok.  I fixed the tags and now it should show up a bit more obvious on the map.  Best of luck in your new business!
map per (2023-03-14 19:03:24+00:00): Cleanded up by others
Mazda05 (2023-02-25 15:17:46+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Russian–Ukrainian_war
Andrea Musuruane (2023-02-23 14:18:59+00:00): https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=757395768474829

Ciao,

Andrea
ivanbranco (2023-02-23 14:36:11+00:00): Questo lo avrei modificato sicuramente (l'ho aggiunto ieri). In ogni caso anche se Mapillary fosse disponibile per ogni cartello non potrei comunque modificarli tutti da solo (i codici sono molti, alcuni non esistevano, altri esistevano e non esistono piu', altri si sono invertiti.), per questo preferisco lasciare un fixme prima che la situazione si complichi ancora di piu' dopo la pubblicazione dei nuovi codici in wiki.
SekeRob (2023-02-24 13:22:32+00:00): "dopo cambio codici sulla wiki".

As they say in English "YCMTSU"

Seeing that change I remembered to have tagged IT:C2 hundreds of times, even ID Editor adopted the descriptive tag at one point so often it was used.

Anyway, the one you put your fixme on is Senso Vietato too, both sides of the oneway street end.

ciao

PS There's a plugin which actually has numeric coding for Italy to include one for "No Exit" which continues to be missing in the Italian wiki you 'corrected'. JOSM has one I attached w/ presets for 5 countries, the German part by far the most expansive. (Deutsche Gründlichkeit ;P). Adding Italy would be far-out.
ivanbranco (2023-02-24 14:06:09+00:00): "which continues to be missing in the Italian wiki you 'corrected'."

Uhm, I didn't "correct" the Wiki with the new codes, that was someone else work: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Highlander
I wouldn't edit the Wiki that drastically without fixing all the codes in the database before. Unfortunately the job is done and everything is a mess now.

Unfortunately after this change lot of traffic signs can't be recognized anymore, since they swapped codes, such as in this case that luckily I could fix only because you put the sign type in words in "description". What I did sadly is just 1% of the job, I guess if it wouldn't be better to just use something like "IT:Senso vietato" instead of codes that are not human readable (and also can change or be wrong since years in the wiki, I don't know).
SekeRob (2023-02-24 14:37:43+00:00): AFAIR Most all the signs I ever did have a description in words, Italian (English) when using the IT:abc codes, not only IT:C2. Truly beyond someone doing that without consultation.

TGIF though
SekeRob (2023-02-26 09:09:16+00:00): If not already seen, have a look north Milano surroundings, 108 hits traffic_sign=IT:Senso vietato up to some 9 years back, seemingly 1 mapper.
martianfreeloader (2023-05-12 14:44:36+00:00): Hi,
welcome to Openstreetmap! If you decide to map sidewalks separately, like here: https://www.osm.org/way/1148513999, then it's good practice make sure to tag the carriageway with sidewalk=separate + foot=use_sidepath

Happy mapping!
klnkengi (2023-04-13 22:57:07+00:00): Hallo prnctrw,

Du hattest mit dieser Änderung leider die Relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1705154/history etwas kaputt gemacht. Es handelte sich heirbei um eine Netzwerk-Relation, die alle Regionalen Hauptradrouten des Sachsennetzes Rad zusammenfasst. Du hast daraus eine Routen-Relation für den Chemnitztalradweg gemacht, die aber trotzdem auch die anderen Routen noch als Unter-Relation enthielt. Ich habe das jetzt mal repariert.

Wenn Du Änderungen am Chemnitztalradweg vornehmen möchtest, ändere bitte nur die Relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3538522

Wenn Du Hilfe brauchst, melde Dich gerne.
woodpeck_repair (2023-03-03 00:50:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 133232206, 133232218, 133232224, 133232227, 133232225, 133232208, 133232216, 133232213, 133232177, 133232229, 133232203, 133232220, 133232198, 133232180, 133232189, 133224701, 133232215, 133232214, 133232188, 133232199, 133232207, 133232205, 133232182, 133232222, 133232186, 133232200, 133232191, 133232223, 133232209, 133232169, 133232230, 133232194, 133232197, 133232210 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import with unclear licensing in Madagascar
FajrAl (2023-02-23 16:30:31+00:00): you're editing it way too large (area)
julcnx (2023-02-24 03:26:53+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap. A few tips for beginners like you:
- start mapping close to your home. do not map things far away you are not familiar with.
- Make small changes one time a time and save
- Focusing on adding new things (missing buildings, roads)…
- Write a better description e.g. added building
- Learn about different imagery and alignments
- If you are not sure, it’s always better to not map it.
- Read the openstreetmap wiki
- Ask questions on the community site
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132925136
Frans S (2023-03-03 14:29:13+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, during the validation process
I noticed that you are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.
We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. Just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.
Please map each building accurate over the rooflines. (your mappings are a bit sloppy)
Square each rectangular building with the Q key.
Nodes of buildings may NOT connect to other buildings or features.
The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 
Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132925223
kurisubrooks (2023-02-23 13:23:54+00:00): Changes discussed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132782477
kapazao (2023-08-22 07:02:44+00:00): Hello, could you give any information about this power line?
I am not sure if it finishes in this tower (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10688207700) or how to verify the voltage.
Regards
Badarau Andrei (2023-08-23 19:14:12+00:00): Hello, I think that power tower is where aereal power line passes to underground cable to nearby wind power generators (Termination mean cable terminals). I am not shure about line voltage. effectively the voltage is high it can't be 132kV. for that type of generation is used usually medium voltage (probably 20kV) only way to know is going on site and see with the eyes of an electrician (counting insulators in a chain of insulators is one of the methods)
kapazao (2023-08-24 07:00:47+00:00): Thank you for your answer, i will change it to minor line and remove the voltage because it is unknown by now.
Regards