piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
grzegorz75jan (2025-07-20 20:55:44+00:00): Tu to nie wiem czy poprzednik się nie pomylił ale bardziej kojarzę 70 km/h po wyjściu na prostą z łuku zjazdu z autostrady.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169207200
dzamper (2025-07-20 21:38:53+00:00): Tego niestety nie wiem,
Natomiast na pewno bliżej prawdy jest to co jest otagowane teraz niż twierdzenie że niektóre ciężarówki mogły tędy jechać 140
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-07-24 11:30:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 169393106 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some (perhaps unintential) changes by a new user that involved quite a lot of deletions in East Yorkshire.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18473
NeisBot (2025-07-20 17:42:47+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
Anytime Anywhere Therapy (2025-07-20 17:47:59+00:00): thank you for bringing this good point, i will review my description to keep it neutral and no seo-related
Anytime Anywhere Therapy (2025-07-20 17:50:36+00:00): i just changed it to: Online therapy clinic based in Burlington, Ontario. Offers virtual sessions across Ontario and in-person care. Services for children (6+), adults, couples, and families.
pitscheplatsch (2025-07-23 07:21:53+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/169207927
CAM-Gerlach (2026-05-27 22:58:52+00:00): Thanks for actually responding to the bot and trying to fix this yourself. I removed the SEO spam image=* and description=* tags as well as redundant healthcare:speciality=* tagging (`psychotherapist` and `counselling` are primary `healthcare=*` tags that you are already using here, not listed specialties) in changeset 183278382

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183278382
Supaplex (2025-07-21 05:32:17+00:00): 請問有實體的存在嗎？如果有賣票的票亭或是公司的位置則可以加上去

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169223800
女神遊艇-遊艇派對 (2025-07-21 12:00:07+00:00): 有實體存在票亭
Supaplex (2025-08-01 13:49:49+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13031738801
已經新增票亭，之後注意被弄到其他既存的線條或點
女神遊艇-遊艇派對 (2025-08-01 13:54:05+00:00): 謝謝您的協助
Fizzie-DWG (2025-07-21 06:58:17+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18464
TnWarrior (2025-07-23 21:16:37+00:00): Hi,
The vandal has created new accounts to undo your reverts and restore their edits, as shown in changesets 169125860 and 169206430. Immediate action is crucial to stop this.
TnWarrior (2025-07-23 21:17:57+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169125860
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169206430
Fizzie-DWG (2025-07-24 11:14:38+00:00): Thank you, but those accounts have already been blocked. Are there more?
ⵣZiri_Atlasⵣ (2025-09-08 18:56:08+00:00): Fizzie-DWG user edits have not yet been reverted
Filip009 (2025-07-22 14:05:13+00:00): Hello, I think, access on this road https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/389406361 has been added due to prohibited movement outside of marked path in national parks. Please return it back.
geochecker53 (2025-07-24 20:39:58+00:00): Thanks for this feedback, which is at first surprising to me. This trail is officially recommend as hiking tour #17 in this guide: https://shop.kompass.de/shop/article/54445146/michael_will_kompass_wanderfuehrer_niedere_und_hohe_tatra_75_touren_mit_extra_tourenkarte.html (1st edition from 2021)

On the other hand there are many other unmarked trails around in the area of the national park, which are not tagged with 'access=no'. There is a long Wiki explanation about this tag: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access

Following this explanation 'access=no' is very restrictive, meaning that "nobody may legally access" this trail. Such access restrictions should also be combined with an appropriate "signage" and "legal regulations". It seems to me that this does not apply here.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-07-20 18:11:07+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11521716515
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1316078243

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
J T E (2025-07-23 00:41:09+00:00): Hi, I now realize I probably should have consulted with you on this (I still do not understand what did not make sense about the path), but I have added it back with what I hope is enough detail in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169309956 .
KlopanRin (2025-07-22 18:27:46+00:00): Wait what lmao my changeset didn't change anything
NeisBot (2025-07-20 18:17:02+00:00): Hi Jackswift960tt6d, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Modified way and updated railway tags to reflect minor line status, removing redundant source and historic information."

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish #AIgenerated
foreigner037 (2025-07-31 18:50:42+00:00): Hi,

are there ongoing roadworks for 8102? I can only find that the road is closed due to landslides.
tevildo_ (2025-07-31 20:07:30+00:00): As of a month ago, it is. There are major road renovations going on -- all the asphalt has been removed and has been replaced with coarse compacted gravel which I assume is supposed to act as a foundation for the new asphalt layer.

It is possible to pass through by regular car at pedestrian speed. It is possible to pass through with a MTB or on foot, but I would generally not appreciate it if I got routed through there.

I had to go through there on my gravel bike... Not fun.

There is also a Road Closed sign in Svidnya's center.
tevildo_ (2025-07-31 22:37:55+00:00): Here's how it looks https://www.facebook.com/groups/roadconditionsadventurebikers/posts/2519886538348781/
aTarom (2025-07-21 14:28:37+00:00): Hola, por el comentario del conjunto de cambios no ayuda mucho, revisa
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
y
lo de
"name:siciliano"?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Country_code#ISO_3166-2
Kovoschiz (2025-07-21 09:27:19+00:00): There's no need to add `access=` anymore, as Carto renders `motor_vehicle=` now. `foot=no` etc is already assumed for `=motorway` , which shouldn't be added unnecessarily.
Kovoschiz (2025-07-21 09:38:50+00:00): 2. And should not change the `=service`
Kovoschiz (2025-07-21 09:29:06+00:00): This `access=no` has no effect if you override it with `foot=` , except for `bicycle=` perhaps. However, `=permit` is defined as ordinarily granted (cf cross-border travel), which should be `=private` if it's restricted.
user_5359 (2025-07-21 09:23:14+00:00): hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/13014192042. What is the mean of the tag Tann = hill?
Harald Hetzner (2025-07-21 15:44:01+00:00): Looks like a mixed up key-value pair that somehow got added to the node.
user_5359 (2025-07-21 17:11:58+00:00): Can it be deleted from your point of view?
Harald Hetzner (2025-07-21 18:09:59+00:00): Invalid tag already deleted.
user_5359 (2025-07-21 08:46:35+00:00): Hallo Norbert! Was soll denn der Schlüssel new bedeuten?
Leo Slager (2025-07-21 13:26:04+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Emma Vriezen (2025-07-21 17:44:35+00:00): Bedankt! Ik heb het bericht gelezen.
Mvg, Emma
dadavid (2025-07-22 09:25:49+00:00): Hi Sam35, 

das surface=erd hier [1] war ein Tippfehler, oder? :) 

VG 

David

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/897978724
marc__marc (2025-11-23 10:40:45+00:00): Hello,
Thanks for the improvement.
camp_site=camp_pitch is depreciated in favor of tourism=camp_pitch
Regards,
Marc
ZekOwney (2025-07-20 19:38:19+00:00): source = aerial imagery
Lambig (2025-11-02 17:58:20+00:00): Bonjour,

Merci pour l'ajout de toutes ces boucles à vélo. Je me suis permis de modifier le tag "route = bicycle" pour "route = mtb", qui est plus aproprié. En effet le premier implique un aménagement cyclable roulant et utilisable toute l'année, tandis que le second est plus adapté pour les chemins de terre utilisables surtout par les VTT et VTC.

Bonne soirée.
map per (2025-07-21 06:05:32+00:00): Hallo Oliver Faivre,

ist die Toilette am Marienplatz eine Doppelung von dieser Toilette https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/320652412 ?

Danke und viele Grüße
map per
bxl-forever (2025-07-20 22:57:15+00:00): Hello,

Adding or fixing one-way streets is okay.

However, on recent Mapillary pictures, I see that there are exemptions for cyclists and moped-A drivers, like here:
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=740469918215724

Yet, you mapped this street is being strictly one-way for *everyone*:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/126494291

Your edit will now block cycle routing.

Have all those M3-signs been removed in your area or is it just a mistake?  Perhaps you forgot to set the additional tags.  I prefer asking before we fix this.

Please reply below this message.  Thanks in advance.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-09 16:03:17+00:00): Hello!

You used
material=rockv
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/363983208/history

Have you maybe meant
material=rock
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
NorthCrab_upload (2025-07-20 20:30:51+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13014322623
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13014322625

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Cristian SF (2025-07-20 20:39:44+00:00): Alterações baseadas na lei complementar 182/2020 da Prefeitura de Iguaba Grande
Fidelis Assis (2025-12-18 21:44:40+00:00): Boa noite, Cristian, Tudo bem? Essa edição, baseada em dados da prefeitura como você indicou, fez com que a área de Iguaba Grande-RJ ficasse 41% maior do que a mapeada anteriormente com base nos dados oficiais publicados pelo IBGE em 2022. e repetidos em 2024. Como os dados da prefeitura mencionados são de 2020, não estariam desatualizados?
Normalmente, os limites oficiais dos municípios são definidos pelos estados e encaminhados ao IBGE para publicação. Você teve acesso a alguma outra fonte que oficializa esses dados da prefeitura?
Cristian SF (2025-12-18 21:58:12+00:00): Boa noite. Eu moro em Iguaba Grande desde 2008. O que ocorre na verdade é que o IBGE não atualiza os dados da região desde 2015. Em 2018 a área que estava em litígio finalmente foi definida e Iguaba passo a ter o traçado conforme a lei municipal indicada. O IBGE nem sempre mantém as informações atualizadas de cada município. Sei disso porque sou técnico cartógrafico da Aeronáutica e trabalho justamente nessa área sempre coletando as bases do IBGE e comparando com as informações municipais (quando existem) pra atualizar as cartas de pilotagem. Infelizmente, devido à quantidade gigantesca de municípios, o IBGE só atualiza as informações quando os próprios municípios entram em contato ou quando retornam para fazer revisão (o que o corre em cerca de 10 anos mais ou menos)
Fidelis Assis (2025-12-19 15:19:06+00:00): Bom dia Cristian. Entendo que as questões de litígio atrasam a publicação oficial do IBGE, que é a que vale legalmente no país. E é justamente o caso. Os limites entre Iguaba Grande-RJ e São Pedro da Aldeia-RJ, embora aprovados pela ALERJ em 2023, continuam em discussão em 2025 conforme essa notícia da própria câmara de Iguaba Grande: https://www.iguabagrande.rj.leg.br/institucional/noticias/limites-de-iguaba-grande-sao-discutidos-em-reuniao-de-comissao-especial-da-camara

Outro ponto importante é o da competência legal para repassar limites ao IBGE para que este os consolide e faça a publicação oficial. Essa competência não é da prefeitura, mas de órgãos oficiais, um em cada Unidade da Federação, responsáveis por interpretar as leis estaduais, as decisões judiciais, traçar os limites e repassá-los ao IBGE. Ou seja, o que uma prefeitura publica independentemente não é considerado nem pelo órgão responsável estadual nem pelo IBGE como a palavra final.

No Estado do Rio, o órgão oficial responsável por traçar e repassar os limites oficiais ao IBGE é o CEPERJ e, se olharmos em suas páginas (https://iderj.ceperj.rj.gov.br/portal/home/webmap/viewer.html?useExisting=1&layers=5b02742c3a814d13a48ad39d9add36e7), a gente verifica que os limites de Iguaba Grande são exatamente os mesmos publicados pelo IBGE tanto em 2022 como em 2024.
Ou seja, não é o IBGE que não atualiza os limites oficiais, mas o órgão responsável por repassá-los, o CEPERJ, que ainda não o fez. E a razão para isso parece ser que ainda não há uma decisão final. Essas questões são complexas e não se pode descartar que ainda possa haver novas alterações nesses limites por acordo entre Iguaba Grande e São Pedro da Aldeia.

Como a publicação oficial com valor legal no país é a do IBGE, creio que é importante aguardar até que novos limites sejam publicados oficialmente pelo IBGE para então podermos atualizar o OSM.
Cristian SF (2025-12-19 19:31:42+00:00): Boa tarde. tem toda razão. ao olhar o projeto de lei Projeto de Lei nº 4567/2021 que foi a base da lei municipal que definiu o traçado que sugeri, foi vetado pelo CEPERJ devido a inconsistências técnicas. vou atentar mais sobre as questões legais nesses casos. Infelizmente acreditei que o município teria a decência de só publicar uma lei na situação de já ter sido aprovada a mudança. Ao que parece os políticos de Iguaba não se preocupam com a legitimidade das lei. Vou verificar como posso fazer a remoção da alteração sugerida.
Fidelis Assis (2025-12-19 21:03:42+00:00): Boa tarde, Cristian. Infelizmente, isso acontece e não dá para confiar em órgãos que não são os responsáveis oficiais pela publicação dos limites oficiais. Já vi outros casos de limites publicados por prefeituras e até mesmo pelo órgão responsável no estado, diferentes daqueles publicados pelo IBGE mas que ainda tinham pendẽncias técnicas ou judiciais que acabaram por reverter o que foi publicado divergente da publicação do IBGE.
Obrigado pela compreensão.
Leo Slager (2025-07-21 13:29:43+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
NorthCrab_upload (2025-07-20 20:51:05+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13014393738

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
SFGJimStreet (2025-07-22 21:48:34+00:00): Bonsoir, vous avez supprimé une partie de la "relation" zone résidentielle ce qu'il la bug et une grande partie de Verviers se retrouve blanchi et non grisé !!! Pourriez-vous corriger ! D'avance merci
Eebie (2025-07-23 16:55:13+00:00): Je voulais commencer par restaurer la relation 2203905 de landuse=residential de Verviers-sud que j'avais en grande partie effacée par erreur. 
Et cela  en partant de la situation avant mon intervention, comme on peut le voir sur https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/28nL . 
Je remarque que vous avez complètement supprimé cette relation.
Quelle est votre intention ? Je voulais restaurer cette relation ce soir et la combiner avec la relation.
Dois-je restaurer cette relation ?
SFGJimStreet (2025-07-23 17:06:45+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai refait des zones résidentielles, et je ne vois rien qui cloche pour l'instant. Donc je pense que ça n'est plus nécessaire (ça a permit de voir et de supprimer des minis zone résidentielle et de les reprendrent par des plus grandes.

Et autre attention à avoir, c'est les "lieux dite non habité" doivent rester des points et non des zones 😉 en tout cas sur la commune de Theux 😉 d'avance merci (car il est difficiles de terminer la zone exact et j'ai repositionné tout c'est point (lieux) par rapport à cadgis (imaginez le travail 😁😅))

Jim
Max-Kritic (2025-07-21 11:36:50+00:00): Salut,

Comme le cadastre met tellement de temps à être mis à jour, je suis intéressé par PCRS Raster et la méthode semi-automatique pour importer. Un lien avec des explications ?

Merci d'avance.
Denis_Helfer (2025-09-04 12:04:09+00:00): Salut,

Oups j'ai un peu de retard dans ma réponse.
Aucune automatisation, vu que c'est du PCRS Raster. La meilleure source pour savoir si on peut en disposer c'est ici : https://pcrs.beta.gouv.fr/suivi-pcrs
Je n'importe jamais rien, j'intègre

Hope this helps...
NorthCrab_upload (2025-07-20 21:26:40+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Zapachu Lasu":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13014419275
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13014419276
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13014419277
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13014419278
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13014419279
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13014419280
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13014419281
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13014419282

"Lawendowa":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13014440345
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13014440346
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13014440347
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13014440348
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13014440553
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13014440921

"Osiedle Cieszyńskie":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13014440440

"Widokowa":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13014440476

"Kasztanowa":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13014440549
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13014440771

"Księdza Piotra Skargi":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13014440566

"Gacka":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13014440569

"Księdza Prałata Edwarda Płonki":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13014440630

"Sobieskiego":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13014440749

"Żwirki i Wigury":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13014440801

"Borka":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13014440803

"Głowackiego":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13014441010

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Graf Westerholt (2025-07-24 19:13:01+00:00): Warum verwendest du nicht „disused:“ anstatt den Knoten zu löschen?
Im Fokus (2025-07-24 21:26:09+00:00): Bürobedarf Kellermann ist seit mindestens einem knappen halben Jahr geschlossen, äußerst unwahrscheinlich, dass der bei der aktuellen Lage im deutschen Einzelhandel seinen Laden noch mal öffnet oder jemand anders übernimmt.
Graf Westerholt (2025-07-24 21:30:54+00:00): Ist das Gebäude abgerissen worden? Wenn nicht, warum dann löschen des Notes, welches den leer stehenden Laden repräsentiert?
Im Fokus (2025-07-24 23:17:22+00:00): Weil der Laden, wie ich Dir schon dargelegt habe, was Du aber geflissentlich ignorierst, kaum je wieder eröffnen dürfte. Wer braucht eine Karte, wo irgendwann aufgrund der explodierenden Online-Käufe mehr ehemalige als aktuelle Läden verzeichnet sind. Du darfst gerne mit "disused" arbeiten, mache ich in Einkaufszonen auch selbst, hier aber nicht. Punkt.
Im Fokus (2025-07-25 00:16:14+00:00): Mir ist wieder eingefallen, weshalb ich mich im konkreten Fall für die Löschung dieses Knotens (node!) entschieden habe. Schon in Version #8 von vor 13 Monaten wurde ein "disused:shop" eingetragen. Ein so langer Leerstand zeigt die Probleme der Lage, die Verkaufsfläche ist eventuell zu klein. Mehr und mehr werden solche Räumlichkeiten umgewidmet, z.B. zu Wohnungen. Oft werden die Schaufenster verhängt, von der Ladenanmutung bleibt kaum noch etwas. 
 
Man hätte selbstverständlich nicht löschen müssen, aber ein Fehler war das Löschen eben auch nicht. Wem nützen schon Eintragungen leerstehender Läden (außer vielleicht Immobilienmaklern)? OSM für Romantiker, die tempi passati nachhängen, als die Fußgängerzonen noch voll waren und der nächste Tante-Emma-Laden um die nächste Ecke?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-09 16:03:21+00:00): Hello!

You used
material=rockv
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/364000905/history

Have you maybe meant
material=rock
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
trial (2025-08-19 09:40:07+00:00): Bravo, tu as gagné le droit de faire une relation pour regrouper les morceaux de l'aber dasn une relation de la source https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1416187717 à l'embouchure ;-).
foehn (2025-08-19 12:02:42+00:00): Bonjour,
Je n'ai pas bien compris, c'est un message ironique ? Est-ce un vrai "Bravo" ou bien y a t'il un problème ?
J'ai passé du temps à créer beaucoup de rivières qui sont un élément structurant du paysage. Grâce à cet outil collaboratif qu'est OpenStreetMap, d'autres peuvent compléter mon travail. Pour ma part, je ne maîtrise pas bien les relations.
Peux-tu préciser ta demande ?
Merci,
trial (2025-08-19 13:15:12+00:00): C'est un vrai bravo, mais oui il y a un problème ou plutôt une suggestion d'amélioration : c'est juste un bout du ruisseau.
Pour concaténer les bouts il faut une relation.
Sur iD : en bas de ton chemin il y Relations(0), tu cliques sur +.
Comme type de relation tu choisis waterway.
Tu ajoutes tout ce qui est commun comme attributs (name, name:br, source:name:br, ref:sandre, wikidata=Q2821559...) - soit dit en passant les cours d'eau en français comportent l'article : L'Aber et non Aber.
Et comme rôle, tu peux mettre main_stream (side_stream si le cours se sépare en parties inégales, main_stream c'est la valeur par défaut, Cf. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=FR:Relation:waterway&uselang=fr). Reste à ajouter de proche en proche en cliquant sur le segment en amont et in fine tu as L'Aber en un seul morceau. Et les outils diront si les noms sont homogènes par exemple, s'il y a des ruptures de continuité, etc.
literan (2025-07-21 19:36:13+00:00): почему же на шлагбаумах access=no? foot+no? запрещено пешком во двор? запрещено на велосипеде? https://yandex.ru/maps/-/CHHP5C8o
Leo Slager (2025-07-21 13:31:03+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Leo Slager (2025-07-21 13:57:16+00:00): Hallo BERMN,

Ik twijfel niet aan je goede bedoelingen, mar hier gaat iets mis:

Een highway=cycleway is default alleen toegankelijk voor fietsers.
Andere access-tags behoeven dan niet te worden toegevoegd.
De bijzondere categorien mofa en moped zij n dan afhankelijk van de verkeersborden G11, G12a of G13.
Zie ook:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Cycleway

En aub nooit beginnen met access=no.  Dat is voor een renderer of een router een teken dat de weg niet gebruikt mag.
worden.  In zijn algemeenheid is een way geschikt voor alle verkeer tenzij anders aangegven door verkeerborden of tekens.

ik zal wat wijzigingen aanbrengen.