piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2026-03-14 13:24:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13647454195 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Real estate office"
---
Zum Beispiel könnte eine neutralere und sachlichere Version deines Textes lauten: "Immobilienbüro"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-03-22 17:33:27+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/180263860
eggie (2026-03-14 13:56:34+00:00): Hoi mtb
Tip.. Je zou de bosgebieden kunnen laten aansluiten.
Mvg
eggie
B252697 (2026-03-14 13:30:46+00:00): Official Map from Singapore National Parks Board (had referenced while editing): https://www.nparks.gov.sg/docs/default-source/parks-docs/west-coast-park/west-coast-park-map.png
B252697 (2026-03-14 13:36:01+00:00): Also referenced Official Map from Singapore National Parks Board: https://www.nparks.gov.sg/docs/default-source/parks-docs/west-coast-park/west-coast-park-map.png
iandees (2026-03-14 14:44:37+00:00): Hi! It looks like a node in this changeset was accidentally moved. This can happen when panning the map. The node has been moved back to its previous position.
ralley (2026-03-16 23:23:50+00:00): Additionally you created a park where one already was mapped an used the incorrect generic name "Park"
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179858240
B252697 (2026-03-14 14:16:30+00:00): All the changes that I've tried to make in this changeset are based on this official source from Singapore National Parks Board, detailing the renovation works at Clementi Woods Park:
https://www.nparks.gov.sg/docs/default-source/activities-doc/notice-of-construction-works-portrait-v6.pdf?sfvrsn=611de85e_1

Would appreciate reviews and edits for the better!
ZioDragon (2026-03-16 17:43:24+00:00): Tại sao bạn lại xoá hết tất cả các thẻ xã phường từ lúc sáp nhập mà lại sử dụng thẻ tên trước khi sáp nhập?
vietnam321 (2026-03-19 05:20:48+00:00): Chào bạn. Không phải là mình dùng thẻ tên trước sáp nhập, mà những tên này là tên của đô thị theo nguồn mà mình đã dẫn trong changeset này. 
Theo định nghĩa trên OSM wiki thì các tag city, town, village... nên dùng để chỉ vị trí trung tâm của 1 cụm dân cư. Như mình đã viết trên tiêu đề của changeset, mình cho rằng nên đặt 1 point duy nhất cho toàn bộ 1 cụm đô thị (thay vì việc gắn 1 city cho 1 phường) sẽ gọn gàng hơn. Các phường lúc này là 1 bộ phận cấu thành đô thị đó thì đặt tag suburb sẽ hợp lý hơn (như ở trong TP.HCM).
Đối với các xã mới giờ đã rộng hơn trước, có thể có nhiều cụm dân cư rải rác (thôn, ấp...) trên địa phận của 1 xã, nên việc đặt tag village để label cho xã giờ không còn phù hợp nữa. 
Để tìm hiểu thêm thì bạn có thể xem qua định nghĩa đô thị và việc phân loại đô thị qua Nghị quyết 111/2025 của Quốc hội và Nghị định 35/2026 của Chính phủ nhé.
Jordi MF (2026-03-15 20:55:01+00:00): Hola Bocatapan,
Has editado unas calles para etiquetarlas "en construcción", pero en el conjunto de datos has explicado que están cortadas por Fallas.
¿Están en obras o has querido indicar que solo estarán cortadas durante los días de Fallas?

Sea como sea, en OSM se recomienda etiquetar unas obras si el acceso estará restringido durante más de un mes. Si dura menos, no es recomendable. En ese caso, debes de usar la siguiente etiqueta y buscar el etiquetado que haga referencia a el acceso restringido temporal: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Conditional_restrictions
Jordi MF (2026-03-15 21:01:51+00:00): Además, si la vía está etiquetada como "construction" los navegadores no calcularán ninguna ruta para los peatones, lo cual no creo que sea cierto porque los vecinos deben de poder acceder a sus viviendas a pie.
Saludos
HellMap (2026-03-19 16:21:31+00:00): No kāda ortofoto tieši tu šo esi zīmējis? Šeit gandrīz viss ir nobīdīts par pārdesmit metriem, izskatās, ka uz ļoti šķībo Bing. Līdz šim viss bija iezīmēts precīzi pēc 7/8 LVM ortofoto.
Mister_R2 (2026-03-23 06:40:46+00:00): Īsti neatceros ar, kuru tieši kartēju, laikam starp Mapbox un Bingu, kaut vai centos abus pielīdzināt ar lielceļiem apakšā.
HellMap (2026-03-23 10:11:14+00:00): Diemžēl problēma, ka Bing nobīde var mainīties pat vienas vietas ietvaros, jo tas no satelīta un visādu iemeslu dēļ ir šķībs. Šeit drošvien, jo te ir neliels pakalns tieši parkam pa vidu un ap to uz visām pusēm nobīdes, bet tagad paskatoties vēl, es arī nezinu kāpēc tik smaga lokāla nobīde.
Mister_R2 (2026-03-23 14:30:41+00:00): Oh, nezināju, ka var būt arī tajā pašā datuma bildē... paskatoties arī redzu, ka ir diezgan liela nobīde
rodolfovargas (2026-03-14 23:16:37+00:00): Gracias por tus aportes. Considera las ediciones de geometría con mayor cuidado. Ya lo mejoramos.
mueschel (2026-03-15 09:36:43+00:00): 

Something went very wrong here. Most of these objects are either markers from your QA tool, or streets that are overlapping with already existing objects.
I reverted this changeset.
mueschel (2026-03-15 09:43:30+00:00): 

Something went very wrong here. Most of these objects are either markers from your QA tool, or streets that are overlapping with already existing objects.
I reverted this changeset.
NeisBot (2026-03-14 14:44:21+00:00): Hi Dored1, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 93% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 17 aeroway(s)
- 3273 building(s)
- 11 military(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179860501
Dored1 (2026-03-14 14:46:55+00:00):  these deletions were intentional in order to replace old building footprint into a new ones
Dored1 (2026-03-14 15:01:20+00:00): if this delet any feature other then buildings so cancel the change please!
zstadler (2026-03-14 17:54:34+00:00): See also my comments on bulk import at 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179827374
zstadler (2026-03-14 18:07:36+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1383299292/history mapped a round bunker.

It was deleted and replaced by a square building.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1488853684
Taya_S (2026-03-15 11:31:47+00:00): Please see: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19963

Import reverted in changesets: 179893379,179893377,179893371,179893367,179893364,179893360,179893356,179893352,179893347,179893343,179893339,179893335,179893332,179893331,179893328,179893325,179893323,179893318,179893317,179893314,179893311,179893308,179893307,179893303,179893300,179893296,179893290,179893288,179893283,179893280,179893275
❤️‍🔥 (2026-03-17 10:49:55+00:00): thanks ian. these people are forced to contribute to OSM by their uni professor, so i've reverted the rest of the poor quality edits
Rubenke (2026-03-16 10:44:55+00:00): Waarom voeg je allemaal voetpaden toe die eigenlijk stoepen zijn en daarom weinig tot geen meerwaarde hebben omdat ze direct aan de weg liggen ipv Use_Sidewalk toe te voegen aan de wegen? Dit is rommelig en maakt routing erg ingewikkeld. Sowieso zou ik daar de tag stoep gebruiken ipv voetpad.
mueschel (2026-03-15 09:42:45+00:00): 

Something went very wrong here. Most of these objects are either markers from your QA tool, or streets that are overlapping with already existing objects.
I reverted this changeset.
mueschel (2026-03-15 09:38:35+00:00): 

Something went very wrong here. Most of these objects are either markers from your QA tool, or streets that are overlapping with already existing objects.
I reverted this changeset.
Marek-M (2026-03-27 14:07:21+00:00): Opis to jakaś brednia a strona internetowa przypisana do budynku to bubel, który już poprawiłem.
joost schouppe (2026-04-28 10:36:15+00:00): Hoi Delgante,
Als de naam al op de site staat, dan moet je die niet ook nog op het veld herhalen. De site was enkel aangeduid als club, maar eigenlijk kan die best als sports_centre aangeduid worden. Ik heb het zo al aangepast
mueschel (2026-03-15 09:35:00+00:00): Something went very wrong here. Most of these objects are either markers from your QA tool, or streets that are overlapping with already existing objects.
I reverted this changeset.
qstep (2026-03-14 22:46:04+00:00): Szia! Megállónál mindegy, mennyi kuka van, elég annyi, hogy bench=yes. Esetlegesen fel lehet vinni külön a szemeteseket amenity=waste_basket -ként.
Supaplex (2026-03-15 03:34:35+00:00): This is Dennis Raylin Chen from the Data Working Group. We have received a report that you are removing name:ru of places. Can you explain  the reason and motive? If there is any discuss about your action that you can provide will help to evaluate the situation.

Dennis Raylin Chen
Data Working Group
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179862324
Supaplex (2026-03-15 03:35:03+00:00): Це Денніс Рейлін Чен з Робочої групи даних. Ми отримали повідомлення про те, що ви видаляєте назви місць name:ru. Чи можете ви пояснити причину та мотив? Якщо є якісь обговорення ваших дій, які ви можете надати, це допоможе оцінити ситуацію.

Денніс Рейлін Чен
Робоча група даних
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179862324
Davi de Souza (2026-03-27 13:05:36+00:00): This Coffee has been closed for over three years.
bartgron (2026-03-14 19:23:41+00:00): Zestaw zmian został wycofany. Proszę o dodanie firmy w postaci osobnego punktu, a nie modyfikowanie całego budynku.
Pozdrawiam
marc__marc (2026-04-02 06:45:01+00:00): Bonjour,
la modification d'accès n'a pas de sens :
tout le monde peux rentrer dans un commerce même sans être client
Cordialement,
Marc
bartgron (2026-03-14 19:25:55+00:00): Zestaw zmian został wycofany. Proszę o dodanie firmy w postaci osobnego punktu, a nie modyfikowanie całego budynku.
Pozdrawiam
eggie (2026-03-15 08:01:18+00:00): Dag rjm   
Lijkt me oke. 
Nu staat no IJsselPolder Hospice op het gebouw zelf. Bestaat dat nog?
Dat zou dan ook op een adresnode kunnen ipv op het gebouw.
Tags hospice:
amenity=social_facility
social_facility=hospice

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-03-15 08:06:54+00:00): Naam van de hospice verplaatst naar adresnode 199 conform website
mike140 (2026-06-30 14:56:52+00:00): Такі назви не потрібні. Вирівняти будинки можна, натиснувши Q
flohoff (2026-07-27 14:35:44+00:00): Moin,
ist das absicht das du hier das building=yes auf dem Gebäude entfernt hast?

Ich packe mal den POI wirklich auf einen Punkt und repariere das Gebäude.
Sammyhawkrad (2026-03-15 14:26:22+00:00): Hi puplampu, don't use descriptions in the name=* tag. "uncompleted building" isn't a name.
puplampu (2026-03-15 18:17:17+00:00): noted, thank you
NeisBot (2026-03-14 15:54:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 15 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/28575354 v11 | 9 crossings
https://osm.org/way/297105972 v7 | 6 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/3009344667 v5

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179863677
bxl-forever (2026-03-14 16:09:13+00:00): ## REVERTED CHANGESET
User dragged a node 195 metres further north, an obvious mistake.
michalgy (2026-03-31 07:29:54+00:00): Cześć, widzę że w tej edycji dodałeś ul przy Łąkach Nowohuckich (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13647738512) - to wygląda na jakąś małą pasiekę na ortofoto. Jak tak to może otagować obszar jako landuse=apiary
 ?
Parowiec Świecący (2026-03-31 12:26:18+00:00): Cześć, dzięki za uwagę, dodałem.
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2026-03-22 02:15:52+00:00): Merhaba. Lütfen gerçek dışı bilgiler eklemeyiniz. Kullandığınız OrganicMaps uygulamasında yer imi oluşturma özelliği mevcut. Parkı kendinize özel bir adla kaydetmek istiyorsanız uygulamanın yer imi özelliğini kullanabilirsiniz. İyi günler.
NeisBot (2026-03-14 15:57:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/138781248 v5

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Window store"
---
Zum Beispiel könnte eine neutralere und sachlichere Version deines Textes lauten: "Fensterladen"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-03-22 17:33:30+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/180043512
Fraxi (2026-03-14 17:19:22+00:00): По-подходящ таг е man_made=cross, тъй като този кръст не е и крайпътен(wayside). А по принцип мисля, че https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1457744953/ е камбанарията и за нея подходящи тагове са man_made=tower + tower:type=bell_tower. Или като отделна сграда building=bell_tower(ако е отделно от храма).
Anonymous36863 (2026-03-14 18:22:16+00:00): Уики страниците са объркващи. Помислих, че man_made=cross не е християнски.
kre777 (2026-03-14 18:13:01+00:00): Hallo Piene
'sidewalk:both:separate' steht für: Auf beiden Straßenseiten befindet sich ein Gehsteig (Trottoir) der als separate Linie eingezeichnet ist. Dss ist hier NICHT der Fall. Schau dir bitte mal die https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:sidewalk:both an bevor du die OSM weiter bearbeitest. Ansonsten werden wir beide mit der Bernauer- & Priener Straße niemals "fertig".
Bitte um Antwort.

Viele Grüße kre777
Piene (2026-03-14 21:19:02+00:00): Hallo kre777,

danke für den Hinweis. Ich war davon ausgegangen, das die Frage, ob ein Gehweg an der Straße oder separat ist, für die Fahrtrichtung (zwecks Routing) gefragt ist und nicht für die Fahrbahnseite. Ich habs korrigiert.

Aber wie wird dann die Information fürs Routing hinterlegt, in welche Richtungen der Rad-/Fußweg benutzt werden darf?

Gruß
Piene
kre777 (2026-03-15 06:55:19+00:00): Hallo Piene
Danke fürs korrigieren.
Bei einer seperat eingezeichneten Rad-/Fußweg-Linie wie hier, ist eine Benutzung in beide Richtungen default also Standartannahme (für Router).
Deshalb muß NICHT zusätzlich ein oneway:no gesetzt werden. Das gleiche gilt ja z.B. auch für Autostraßen (unclassified,residential,service...). Auch hier wird ein onewy:yes nur wenn zutreffend eingetragen. oneway:no ist also 'eigentlich-überflüssig' aber optional möglich, und kann zur Verdeutlichung gesetzt werden.

Viele Grüße kre777
mueschel (2026-03-17 14:21:17+00:00): Hi,
could you check the tags on this supercharger? The socket tags are deprecated and should be replaced:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:socket:*
stillhart (2026-03-17 17:13:51+00:00): Why?

These are more or less equivalent, and were only recently deprecated. hence should stay for a while so consumer apps can catch up.
socket:tesla_supercharger_ccs=14
socket:tesla_supercharger_ccs:output=150 kW

it's why I added that one. 
socket:type2_combo=14
socket:type2_combo:output=150 kW

the older one probablz stays valid, since these reference old charging plug which are still on older chargers. I think they are tesla only.
socket:tesla_supercharger=14
socket:tesla_supercharger:output=150 kW
NeisBot (2026-03-14 16:06:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 11 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/969708363 v5 | 6 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1062889334 v10 | 5 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/8973539900 v9

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179864300
iandees (2026-03-14 16:17:00+00:00): Hi! It looks like a node in this changeset was accidentally moved. This can happen when panning the map. The node has been moved back to its previous position.
eggie (2026-03-14 16:19:40+00:00): Hi Jurrt.

What is it?
..building=bunker?

Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2026-03-15 08:11:25+00:00): building (bunker) added
Please comment your edits properly.
Greetz,
eggie
Bienson (2026-03-14 22:05:50+00:00): Dreifach übereinanderliegende Flächen
NeisBot (2026-03-14 16:18:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13647794426 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Boat rental"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-03-22 17:33:33+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/179865710
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-01 23:15:21+00:00): Further repaired in changeset 182741078 and changeset 183521995

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182741078

https://osm.org/changeset/183521995
ilias_ (2026-03-16 20:00:23+00:00): rue de theplug????
Josef73 (2026-05-06 17:27:20+00:00): Sind die Öffungszeiten korrekt?
datenkrake156 (2026-05-06 20:35:21+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis, die von mir nicht geänderten Öffnungszeiten stammten vermutlich noch aus der Vorgängerpraxis.
Habe die Öffnungszeiten nach den Angaben auf der Patientenkarte aktualisiert.
Josef73 (2026-05-18 05:29:40+00:00): In Ordnung. Nur ist die Frage: Wann endet die Mittagspause. 13:00 Uhr oder später?
datenkrake156 (2026-05-30 14:01:40+00:00): Hallo,
urlaubsbedingt habe ich die Rückmeldung erst heute gesehen. Ich hatte vorher die Eingaben noch schnell eingetippelt, aber wohl nicht richtig gespeichert oder überschrieben (bin halt Anfänger ohne viel Erfahrung). Offensichtlich hat ein fleißiger Admin zwischenzeitlich den Fehler bemerkt und korrigiert. Vielen Dank an dieser Stelle dafür. Die angezeigten Öffnungszeiten lauten jetzt so wie auf der Patientenkarte.
ilias_ (2026-03-16 20:00:03+00:00): what's nf en y?
HellMap (2026-03-24 17:36:24+00:00): Šeit sēta ir pievienota ceļam https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13647818522
NG218 (2026-03-17 01:12:56+00:00): Please try to keep these changes localized to each area as much as possible. It's not helpful for the rest of us to have one change that spans the entire globe.
coatix (2026-03-17 05:12:49+00:00): ok! :)
somehundred (2026-03-16 13:42:14+00:00): Would've been nicer to change shop=convenience to disused:shop=convenience or shop=vacant. That way history is preserved.

Here are related wiki articles:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused:*
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dvacant
markalex- (2026-03-16 13:53:13+00:00): It didn't look just like a vacant shop. It seemed to me that the same premises were used for storage or some business without sign: windows are lined with translucent film, entrance looked a bit refreshed, but no sign of construction work, so I wouldn't expect it to open as a new shop or something.
Would this still be correct to use disused:*=* in this case?
somehundred (2026-03-16 14:02:33+00:00): Yes, it would.
markalex- (2026-03-16 14:20:19+00:00): Reverted and retagged as disused at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179954275
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-01 23:15:07+00:00): Further repaired in changeset 182741078 and changeset 183521995

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182741078

https://osm.org/changeset/183521995
MappingMore (2026-03-15 08:34:29+00:00): Revert of 179781687
infeeeee (2026-04-17 11:39:27+00:00): Szia!

Ilyet ne csinálj, hogy a lépcsőkre raksz bicycle=no -t, ennek nincs értelme. Útvonaltervezőknek abból, hogy lépcső ki kell tudni találnia, hogy fel tud-e ott menni.

Persze ha a lépcső alján lenne egy biciklivel behajtani tilos tábla akkor jogos lenne. Sokan tudnak lépcsőn lefele menni biciklivel, ezzel a változással őket megszívattad, hosszabb úton kell menniük.

A több címke nem feltétlenül jobb...

Javítva.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-03-17 20:15:12+00:00): dzięki! BDOTa się nie spodziewałem
gpserror (2026-03-14 16:58:04+00:00): forgot to also indicate for reviewers: also removed some roads that aren't showing up in recent satellite imagery.
feilik (2026-05-29 10:09:39+00:00): Podałbyś źródło danych tego "aktualnego planu"?
DiogoBaptista98 (2026-04-06 05:21:23+00:00): Bem-vindo ao OpenStreetMap. A edição destruiu incorretamente o polígono da Igreja e Convento de São Francisco. A Capela dos Ossos não é um edifício distinto, pelo contrário, faz parte do convento e situa-se no seu interior. Para além disso, já existia o nó (6763794307) correspondente à capela, tendo sido duplicado indevidamente. Dito isto, a edição foi revertida. Tem atenção a estes detalhes em futuras edições.
Boas edições.
SomeoneElse (2026-04-11 13:12:58+00:00): Are you sure that https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12064695480 actually exists?  For completeness https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5402530089 _does_ exist, but this seems to be a duplicate of it.
stillhart (2026-04-11 14:10:40+00:00): As much as I remember yes. The below one is an older 150kw one and a new faster 250kw has been added. In Tesla terms they seem to be the "same". they don't seem to have a logic on when they "split" and when not. 

I think it was that picture
https://x.com/TeslaInTheUK/status/1788553023326699808?s=20
stillhart (2026-04-11 14:16:15+00:00): Maybe they should be related in OSM, would make it more clear.
SomeoneElse (2026-04-11 13:10:49+00:00): Are you sure about the name here?  The pictures at https://www.mcarthurglen.com/ko/outlets/uk/designer-outlet-york/whats-on/ev-charging/ do not support the name that you have used.
SomeoneElse (2026-04-11 13:16:58+00:00): For more info on this sort of thing generally in OSM see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Shops#Identity