piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2025-11-12 15:22:23+00:00): On this task, the high-rise buildings are incorrect mapped.
You can see both one or more side walls and the roof. The Imagery is taken under a certain angle, so you can see more .
Often all visible walls and roofs are mapped as 1 building.
The correct way is to map the roofline and move the whole object on their footprint.
See this video.
https://youtu.be/dsfUcslLtVc?si=bEHwRl1sxDI_GA0H

Best regards and keep mapping
mcliquid (2025-09-19 13:30:27+00:00): operator:type=marina gibt es nicht: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/operator%3Atype=marina
Und das Tagging war wiki-konform: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:seamark:small_craft_facility:category

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172163417
Vinber-Pro (2025-09-19 13:12:11+00:00): Bonjour Gwen_ch,
par curiosité, cette référence cela correspond à quelque chose de visible ou une donnée du patrimoine ?

merci pour tes contributions
Gwen_ch (2025-09-19 14:18:43+00:00): Re, 
J'ai mis l'identifiant qui est dans l'ascenseur parce que je l'ai pris, mais il y a toute la liste que le patrimoine devrait nous transmettre ! Donc c'est les 2
Vinber-Pro (2025-09-19 14:22:22+00:00): re,
parfait, merci de ton retour
mcliquid (2025-09-19 13:34:21+00:00): operator:type=marina gibt es nicht: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/operator%3Atype=marina
Und das Tagging war wiki-konform: osm.wiki/Key:seamark:small_craft_facility:category

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172163585
mcliquid (2025-09-19 13:35:53+00:00): operator:type=marina gibt es nicht: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/operator%3Atype=marina
Und das Tagging war wiki-konform: osm.wiki/Key:seamark:small_craft_facility:category

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172163650
Kovoschiz (2025-09-20 17:01:33+00:00): `pedestrian` means it's physically passable by vehicles, only restricted by rules or removable barriers. This is also to be consistent with the `highway=` + `area=yes`
rempshaener (2025-09-19 19:25:05+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.
Du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Das sieht gut aus.
Bei Hydranten ist es sinnvoll, insbesondere noch die Nennweite zu ergänzen.
Vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag und weiterhin viel Spaß beim Mappen.
Viele Grüße
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-09-20 11:45:36+00:00): Please do not remove transitions. There were carefully added and are accurate.
skumarchandela_lyft (2025-09-23 09:31:14+00:00): Hello, ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy!
My name is Sumit, and I’m a mapper in the OSM team at Lyft and Gaurav’s Teammate.
Thank you for your message, and for catching this error!
Currently, we have limited experience with the placement tag, and we missed the value transition. I apologize for this mistake. We will update our policy based on your comments. Thank you for correcting the tags. I will be more attentive when pushing change sets up with placement tag. 

Best regards!
Sumit
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-09-23 10:33:42+00:00): Thanks!

See the wiki on lanes: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lanes at section "Motorway with lanes and destinations" and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Placement section "Current status: lane count decreases"

Thanks!
TheNightRider (2025-09-19 12:50:13+00:00): Thank you! I don't know how that "ad1dr:street" got in there. It's never happened before. :)
campbelltree (2025-09-26 05:56:14+00:00): Hello, I have effectively reverted this in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172467953 by putting in the restrictions according to the signs posted on the gates. Can you verify that all buildings are still routable after my change?
skumarchandela_lyft (2025-09-26 11:59:43+00:00): Hi, Campbelltree! My name is Sumit and I’m a mapper in the OSM team at Lyft. 
Thank you very much for correcting all the gates on the area and informing us about it. Your concern for how your changes impact us is greatly appreciated. 
We interpret the access:delivery=no tag as indicating that entry is prohibited for companies providing services to the public. In this changeset, I removed the access:delivery=no based on recent GPS data of vehicles, which showed drivers passing through the gate just a week ago: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1IdAoTuaZDClEXpVeGGBhkPhU24HVg9b4/view?usp=sharing. It looks like, despite the presence of a private property sign, companies providing services are allowed to enter the area. Based on the sign, it might be more appropriate to retain only the access=private tag.
A similar situation exists with these gates (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10578346953). We also have active passes here, and in my opinion, the access=private tag should suffice. 

According to our data, these gates are closed (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10578346948). However, we lack information to confirm whether the gates are open on certain days. 

Regarding the other gates, it seems that our data aligns with yours.

Your edits will slightly impact our routing. Nonetheless, the most crucial aspect is to ensure that the map reflects the actual situation. If you possess local knowledge, we would greatly appreciate it if you could adjust the map accordingly. Thank you for your contribution to OSM!


The screenshots will be available for a month. Please let me know if you are unable to view them within this timeframe – I could generate them once again.

Regards,
Sumit
campbelltree (2025-09-26 20:09:16+00:00): I was also considering tagging them as `hgv` instead of `delivery` since observation indicates the rules are mostly enforced for heavy trucks.
campbelltree (2025-09-27 06:04:22+00:00): Just submitted #172511124 which makes all gates except the delivery gates hgv restricted and gate 4 allow non-hgv deliveries.
skumarchandela_lyft (2025-09-29 10:06:42+00:00): Thank you for the modification. The access:delivery tag is particularly important to us. Currently, HGV tag is outside the scope of our current projects, and we lack extensive experience in its use. That said, your approach appears logical and beneficial for OSM.

Regards,
Sumit
Jrachi (2025-12-22 13:18:37+00:00): Ciao.
Se su un palo guidepost è messo un cartello località, non significa che il guidepost si chiami come la località, ma che quello è il nome della località.

Ivo
cartomatto (2025-12-22 20:13:58+00:00): Ciao
ne abbiamo già parlato https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172119129#map=14/44.98172/7.31709

Come ha segnalato @ivanbranco nella wiki si dice che _il nome è il luogo di posa_ https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:CAI#Luoghi_di_posa per cui ti chiederei di evitare rimozioni non conformi alle specifiche fin qui seguite e su cui c'è accordo da 10 anni e che sono perfettamente sensate.
Altre argomentazioni le ho già indicate a suo tempo per cui ti rinvio a quella discussione.
eggie (2025-09-19 15:07:51+00:00): Dag Moiety,

Grebbeliniepad 04 klopt nog.
MVG
eggie
Moiety (2025-09-19 15:51:13+00:00): Dank!
eggie (2025-09-19 11:00:20+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feeedback   Het is niet de bedoeling om persoonlijke info op gebouwen te zetten.
Dat is zichtbaar voor de hele wereld. 
Ook hoeft er geen adres op de gebouwomtrek... Er is al een adresnode. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-09-19 11:41:05+00:00): Ik heb het weer aangepast.
Dindia (2025-10-03 08:17:26+00:00): Did you change rte. 1 next to Kfar Habad? I cycled there before and the highway is not what it appears.
I'm fixing it.
Comino (2025-09-19 11:42:53+00:00): Hi,

Please leave out legal form out of the company name. I have updated several tags on your POI.
https://btcmap.org/merchant/node:3487468370

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
https://btcmap.org/tagger/6794624
ExoMal (2025-09-19 21:12:41+00:00): Hiya mate, are you sure addr:unit="Unit 1" is appropriate? Per TagInfo, there's ~1000 uses of addr:unit="Unit 1" and ~520000 uses of addr:unit=1.
AddrMapper (2025-09-20 14:42:20+00:00): Hey, yeah Unit/Flat/Suite is explicity tagged in the UK.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses_in_the_United_Kingdom#Address_tags
ExoMal (2025-09-21 11:16:35+00:00): Well, I've learned something new then, thanks!
AddrMapper (2025-09-21 11:28:25+00:00): No worries :)
zabop (2025-09-19 11:58:39+00:00): Please use meaningful changeset comments. "q" on its own does not seem to be meaningful, if I'm missing something, please enlighten me.
LordGarySugar (2025-10-15 15:06:16+00:00): Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap! Thanks for helping to add some detail to your local area! Unfortunately, the source you've used (Herts CC webmap) uses Ordnance Survey maps which are Crown Copyright, which means they cannot be used to help edit OSM in any way. Sadly this means that all the addresses and other names/details you've added from this source will need to be removed. The buildings can stay as I can see they have been traced from Esri. Currently the only way we have for adding addresses in the UK is walking around and entering what we can see. For this I would recommend an app like StreetComplete (android only) which makes it easy to add housenumbers while walking around. Please let me know if you're happy for me to remove these addresses and make some corrections (I would be happy to give you feedback about some things that could be improved.) Thank you.
Ayyayo (2025-10-15 15:24:22+00:00): Hi, thank you for the warm welcome and for taking the time to review my edits. I'm really sorry, I'm new to OSM editing and wasn’t aware of the copyright restrictions around using sources like the Herts CC webmap. I appreciate you pointing this out.
Please feel free to go ahead and remove the addresses and make any necessary corrections. Some of the details I added were from my own local observations, but I understand that most were based on the Herts website, which I now realise isn’t allowed.
I live in the estate as well and would love to continue contributing in the right way. Thanks again for offering to give feedback. I’d be happy to learn from you and improve my future edits.
LordGarySugar (2025-10-15 20:23:54+00:00): Just to let you know, I was advised to send an email to the Data Working Group so they can perform a redaction (all copyrighted information will be permanently deleted from the database). For this reason I would recommend that you do not modify anything in this area until this is done, to make this as easy as possible for them. You are of course welcome to edit things elsewhere in Stevenage in the meantime :)

Now some small pointers - for an apartment building, use building=apartments, not landuse=residential + residential=apartments. You can see on the map that they are a different colour to the rest of the buildings you added.
- Use 'Q' to square buildings
- highway=unclassified is for rural roads, in a residential area use highway=residential for normal roads and highway=service for thinner access roads serving a couple of houses.
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1442117777 has been traced slightly incorrectly, it should be a perfect rectangle, but you have followed the roof line which has been projected by the imagery, which is at an angle. In reality this roof doesn't extend out in a triangular shape. If you are editing tall-ish buildings you will notice how the imagery can distort their shape slightly, it's a good skill to be able to counteract that!

I hope that's all ok for now, let me know if you have any problems editing in the future, I would be happy to advise/review. As you can see, there's a lot of blank areas in the rest of Stevenage that also need attention!
StC (2025-09-19 14:40:31+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre qui passe par là. Je m'occupe de la réparation.
eggie (2025-09-19 15:02:28+00:00): Dag AvNVRZL

emergency = yes helpt dan niet op een node.
Ik heb de alleen rechtdoor beperking aangepast met except=emergency

Je zult zoiets dus in de afslagbeperking (relatie)  moeten aanpassen.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-09-19 11:51:45+00:00): Hi  

Your edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=172157663

A lot of damage to the map.

I restored the buildings.
Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2025-11-05 15:53:56+00:00): Hoi Cas,

De fietsroute over het leerpark routeerde niet meer, want je had van het G11 fietspad een wandelpad (regenboog-crossing) gemaakt. Ik het nu die highway crossing(s) op de nodes gezet 
Het is gewoon een doorgaande route voor fietsers met G11 bebord. 

MVG
eggie
NeisBot (2025-09-19 11:45:40+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-09-26 14:04:39+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/172171426
spughetti_tomtom (2025-09-19 11:48:52+00:00): Add highways*
richlv (2025-09-20 09:04:55+00:00): Sveiki, liels paldies par kartes papildināšanu.
OpenStreetMap liekam oficiālus vai kopīgi izmantotus nosaukumus - tādus kā "field 5" kopienas dalībnieki jau ir palabojuši un pārlikuši skaitli "reference" laukā.
custodiankeyy (2025-09-19 20:08:32+00:00): Peki bu araba yoluna yayalar nasıl ulaşıyor? Veya kafeye nasıl ulaşıyorlar? O yolları neden sildiniz?
rumixist (2025-09-25 17:25:51+00:00): O yolların orda olduğunu unutmuşum ve bir an yok sanmışım geri ekleyeceğim
rumixist (2025-09-25 17:27:42+00:00): Eklemeye çalışırken fark ettim de o yollar Trafik Park'ın içindeki araba yollarına bağlı değiller. Parkın içinde de normal bir kaldırım var yani yaya yolu gibi değil diğer binalara ve yollara bu kaldırım sayesinde ulaşılıyor
rumixist (2025-09-26 08:44:11+00:00): Arabalar da hep o yollarda duruyor pedallı arabalar onlar, gelenler biniyor sırası gelince iniyor. Caddeye bağlı değiller.
custodiankeyy (2025-09-26 18:17:58+00:00): Demeye çalıştığım şey şuydu: Bu pedallı arabaları sürmek için yaya olarak gelenler nereden geliyor? Veya yürüyüş yoluna ulaşmak isteyenler hangi yol ile ulaşıyor? Eğer dediğiniz gibi bu yolun kenarında kaldırım varsa sidewalk etiketini kullanarak yoldaki kaldırımı belirtebilirsiniz. Bu durumda yaya yolunu o yola bağlamanızda bir problem olmaz.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sidewalks
rumixist (2025-09-27 10:52:10+00:00): Aslında böyle çizgi ile belirtilecek bir kaldırım değil demek istediğim. Yani bir meydan gibi düşün etrafında insanlar dolaşabiliyor ancak orta kısmında pedallı arabalar için yer var orada yaya olarak dolaşamıyorlar. Bunu tam olarak nasıl anlatacağımı bilemiyorum. Yürüyüş yoluna da genelde herhangi bir yerden yandan ulaşılabiliniyor ancak çimlere basmadan ulaşmak için kuzey ve güney kapılarının olduğu yerden yürüyüş yoluna geçilebiliyor. Pedallı arabaları sürmek için bu sağ taraftaki yolun kenarında bekliyorlar ordan direk arabaya biniyorlar.
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2025-09-28 03:53:47+00:00): Merhaba @rumixist. Söylediğiniz yeri gerçekte görmesem de bu yorumları okuduktan sonra buranın fotoğraflarına internetten baktım. Eğer bu park yakın bir zamanda değişmediyse sildiğiniz yolların bence de geri eklenmesi gerekiyor. Silinen yaya yolları, pedallı araç yolu dediğiniz yollara bağlanmıyor olsa da railway=miniature etiketiyle eklenmiş yollara bağlı(değiyor) gibi görünüyor.

Ortada pedallı araçların kullanıldığı alan, amenity=traffic_park etiketi ile eklenebilir gibi duruyor. Etiketin Viki sayfası: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dtraffic_park
rumixist (2025-09-28 09:11:43+00:00): Merhaba, @HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi. Girişlerdeki yollar minyatür demir yollarına değiyor haklısınız. O zaman sanırım bu yolları giriş kapısından demir yollarına kadar tekrar çizmem gerekiyor.

Ayrıca trafik park etiketinin olduğunu bilmiyordum mesajınız için teşekkür ederim.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-09-19 12:51:25+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8491837570
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/362247360

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
rempshaener (2025-09-19 18:43:57+00:00): Hallo,
was spricht gegen farmyard?
VG
Znaika (2025-09-19 18:49:20+00:00): Hi, eigentlich nichts. Dieser Schlüßel von dir construction:leisure=	horse_riding hat mich dazu bewegt. Ich sehe, da war auch construction=	farmyard  dabei
rempshaener (2025-09-19 18:52:06+00:00): Ja genau, vor allem auch, weil das alte Gebäude noch steht und da auch regelmäßig Gerätschaften stehen, die nicht nur aufs Reiten schließen lassen.
Znaika (2025-09-19 18:59:30+00:00): ich habe es zurück geändert. VG
rempshaener (2025-09-19 19:06:15+00:00): Danke dir und viele Grüße
BCNorwich (2025-09-19 14:20:23+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Building is added with tags and address amended to OSM practice.

Regards Bernard.
StC (2025-09-19 14:37:47+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre qui passe par là. Je m'occupe de la réparation.
PPN_QRGA (2025-09-22 06:52:48+00:00): Bonjour,

Merci de votre attention !
Frans S (2025-11-12 10:29:36+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
A: Inaccurate mapping. 
High building(s) incorrect mapped. 
Check this footage how to map high buildings

https://youtu.be/dsfUcslLtVc?si=yH6eWDbsb_ILAVb9
 Or See par 20 chapter About Buildings

Best regards and keep mapping


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172160222
Aleksandar Matejevic (2025-10-09 07:45:37+00:00): Hi berjk, 

Please do not change name:de tag with old names of the cities. There is already old_name:de=Preßburg attribute present for Bratislava, and if you want to add old names to some other towns, please use old_name:de= tag
berjk (2025-10-09 14:00:05+00:00): Hello, you make a big mistake!

For people searching town names in German, are searching for the original german name. That's = Preßburg. You mean the international or offical name.
That's is of course Bratislava.
For a correct working with www.openstreetmap.de/karte you must use the german name (name:de).
Aleksandar Matejevic (2025-10-09 14:07:21+00:00): Ok, you map it for rendering on www.openstreetmap.de/karte but still, not a valid data. Preßburg was the name, but now officially, as you say it is Bratislava. I do get it that people in Germany refer to it as Preßburg but it is old name, and it is tagged as such. I would recommend that for the rendering on  www.openstreetmap.de/karte developers use old_name:de. This is not a single case, I have seen and corrected couple of name:de changes to some names that were used only during occupation in WWII and it was never official name of the place.
Aleksandar Matejevic (2025-10-09 14:10:08+00:00): The German name Preßburg was the primary name used for the city until 1919.
mavl (2025-11-23 07:40:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 175015324 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible source - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18891].
AndyB_66 (2025-09-23 19:23:25+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
zabop (2025-09-19 13:24:30+00:00): Please use meaningful changeset comments. "й" on its own does not seem to be meaningful, if I'm missing something, please enlighten me.
Oskarst_ (2026-02-26 11:27:02+00:00): Hei,
Ser way 1431171867 har ganske mye aktivitet i Strava heatmap, vet du om den er åpnet?
FennecusZerda (2026-02-26 11:55:57+00:00): Hei. Ja, det er åpnet her. Bare jeg som har glemt å oppdatere alt sammen. Det ble mye endringer i Drammensområdet, men sykehus togspor og -stasjon på samme tid. Bare oppdatere hvis du vil. Så du åpnet GS-veien nærmere sykehuset også. Bra jobba! Takk, Trond
TrickyFoxy (2025-09-19 16:31:11+00:00): 1. В name должно быть имя на местном языке
2. Викидату не удаляем
NorthCrab_upload (2025-09-19 17:31:44+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.

"Marszałka Piłsudskiego":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1349851839
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1349851840

"Ignacego Paderewskiego":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1349851841
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1349851842

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NeisBot (2025-09-19 13:03:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-09-26 14:04:18+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/172171355
Frans S (2025-11-02 13:31:00+00:00): Keep an eye on complex buildings. Especial the high rise (multi story) buildings and buildings which shows their side views  as well. Check this footage how to map these buildings 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dsfUcslLtVc
https://drive.google.com/file/d/13RTwH7sChRWrG5bIjysF2ripBgh3F5l4/view?usp=sharing 
And,  solve the issues shown on the issue triangle before you upload your mappings.
Best regards and keep mapping
B252697 (2025-09-19 13:11:05+00:00): I saw earlier today that the point of connection of this foot path (red dash) and the cycle / walk path (blue dash) is not directly underneath Clementi Ave 6 (as it was previously indicated on OSM), but rather on the west of Clementi Ave 6. I tried to make this change on OSM, and adjusted the surrounding paths accordingly based on what I saw.
zabop (2025-09-19 13:24:56+00:00): Please use meaningful changeset comments. "й" on its own does not seem to be meaningful, if I'm missing something, please enlighten me.
eggie (2025-09-19 14:43:26+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
jonsger (2025-09-22 17:56:43+00:00): Hi Janno,
ich war vor einigen Tagen auch vor Ort und würde "La Mangiatoia" eher als Imbiss kategorisieren (Piadine, Focaccia...).
Wenn du nichts dagegen hast würde ich das umtaggen.
Viele Grüße
Jonathan
JannoRei92 (2025-09-23 18:31:09+00:00): Ja klar, von mir aus.
Imbiss im deutschen Sinne war mir etwas zu banal für die feinen Snacks die es dort gab.
NeisBot (2025-09-19 13:18:39+00:00): Hello, thank you for your contribution.

Your changeset was commented because it appears to follow a pattern that could be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related.

Could you kindly confirm if your map edits were intentional?

#MapWithoutSpam #Name #Comment
NeisRevert (2025-09-26 14:03:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/172487702
where the changeset comment is: 
Remove unclear map edits
pitscheplatsch (2025-09-20 06:16:04+00:00): This is #spam.