piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Szabó Bendegúz (2025-07-26 10:28:24+00:00): Szia!
Alapvetően a Nemzeti Térinformatikai Alaptérkép, Google Utcaképek, illetve a Veszprémben való futárkodás útján szerzett tapasztalataimból dolgoztam.
A Hajnal utca 3-mal kapcsolatban pedig igazad van, sajnos elsiklott a figyelmem afelett, hogy 2021-ben elbontották a házat, és most üres a telek; javítom is.
vasony (2025-07-27 05:03:03+00:00): Szia!

Éppen ezért sem veszünk át adatokat más térlépekről, másrészről az adott térképek licensze, különösen a Google utcakép és maps nem használható az osm bővítésére.

Kérlek hagyatkozz a személyes felmérésedre a házszámok tekintetében is. 
A nemzeti alaptérkép támpontnak jó, de mindig ellenőrizendő a helyszínen, hogy mi a valóság, mert sokszor van hogy az azon szereplő házszám a helyszínen nem éppen az.

Tamás
Szabó Bendegúz (2025-07-28 12:31:39+00:00): Rendben, köszönöm a tanácsokat! Ettől függetlenül remélem, sokat sikerült hozzádnom a térképhez a város tekintetében, személy szerint futárkodásnál is kész horror ez a néhány utca, elsősorban az ebből eredő frusztráció motivált, hogy kezdjek vele valamit.


Utcaképről adatot nem használtam fel, csupán végszükség esetén ellenőriztem vele a saját adataimat.
GSF1200S (2025-08-08 13:38:03+00:00): 我在现场看到是“紫金大道”....
NeisBot (2025-07-23 00:16:47+00:00): Hi Ale22211, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Corrected spelling in street name tag"

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish #AIgenerated
5m4u9 (2025-07-23 03:40:39+00:00): Hola, veo que editaste el área, tengo algunos comentarios:

* el área total cambiaste a condominio, en realidad aquí se asigna que tipo de vivienda, la idea es responder en que tipo de vivienda viven las personas... aquí sería departamentos. condominio es el "tipo" de propiedad del terreno... es decir.

* las calles que elegiste entre edificios, no es común en bolivia, porque tiene restricciones... por ejemplo, la gente puede caminar en la calle y el auto debe esperar a que termine de caminar. eso es muy raro en bolivia, en casi todo lado es prioridad el auto.
Minh Nguyen (2025-07-23 00:25:13+00:00): (This only affects the Vietnamese name.)
Udarian (2025-07-23 02:58:48+00:00): I don't know if local knowledge applies when you edited objects in multiple countries, so why did you change multiple shop=convenience to shop=tortilla, how do you know that those stores only sell tortilla's; if it's just the names I don't know if that is enough.
CENTSOARER (2025-07-24 19:43:19+00:00): I reverted those specific shops when I realized they weren't in Mexico.
user_5359 (2025-07-23 10:42:41+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You move a street node more than 100 meters trough other buildings and streets. I repair the situation.
fortera_au (2025-07-27 00:12:32+00:00): Hi,

Andrew from the Data Working Group here.

Can you please explain your edits here. While the construction items you removed aren't visible on aerial imagery, the items you have added also don't reflect on aerial imagery.

Kind regards,  
Andrew Welch, OSMF Data Working Group

(translated with deepl)

안녕하세요,

데이터 작업 그룹의 앤드루입니다.

여기서 진행하신 편집 내용을 설명해 주시겠어요? 제거하신 건설 관련 항목들은 항공 사진에 표시되지 않지만, 추가하신 항목들도 항공 사진에 반영되지 않고 있습니다.

감사합니다,  
앤드루 웰치, OSMF 데이터 작업 그룹
fortera_au (2025-08-01 23:47:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 169841222, 169841249, 169841240, 169841260, 169841200, 169841256, 169841237, 169841215, 169841214, 169841228, 169841245, 169841232 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: incompatible source
willkmis (2025-07-24 22:31:09+00:00): Sorry, what's going on here? Seems to be a spam link in note=* for a bunch of restaurants and roads?
unknown246 (2025-07-24 23:23:45+00:00): Damn, more of this crap? I was hacked the other day, didn't catch it until last night. Apparently I (the owner) have to suffer the consequences for what the hacker did on OSM, which is more akin to what you would see when someone hacks your Facebook and messages all your friends.
willkmis (2025-07-24 23:40:13+00:00): Ah sorry to hear that! If it's OK with you, I (or you) can reach out to the Data Working Group, data@openstreetmap.org. They have tools to handle these kind of vandalism issues by mass-reverting the affected objects. Then folks like me will probably stop pinging you. Glad you've regained control of your account though, sorry about the hassle!
unknown246 (2025-07-25 00:35:54+00:00): Thank you for the info! I will look into it.
Matt McCutchen (2025-07-25 00:48:51+00:00): See the discussion on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169357242 .  I'm already working on reverting the "5TDGBRCH4MS037831" spam in all of unknown246's changesets.  But I'm a relatively junior user; if DWG wants to take this over and has better tools, go for it.  Is there a better place to put a notice so other mappers don't inquire on more individual changesets?
unknown246 (2025-07-25 01:42:11+00:00): Much obliged
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2025-10-18 00:05:42+00:00): name请填写当地语言，在中国大陆不需要非得强行“国际化”去写成英语的，写成英语都没法还原出汉字来
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169320382
Necessarycoot72 (2025-07-27 03:24:51+00:00): Hi, it seems that you might have messed up the Vegas valley relation (relation 18991913) it is currently is an unclosed relation
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-07-27 06:51:09+00:00): The term "Las Vegas Valley" refers to two things: The metropolitan area and the natural feature. The former's boundaries are exactly the same as Clark County's; for the latter, editors like Vespucci will warn me that valleys should not be closed ways. I am currently working to define the natural valley's boundaries by compiling information from different websites. So far, I've mapped the valley's northern and eastern boundaries.
gymate (2025-08-13 09:08:45+00:00): Szia! Mi ezeknek a módosításoknak a forrása?
itamas80 (2025-08-19 12:51:48+00:00): Szia! Fényképeim vannak, amin látszik a metró nyomvonala. Ezen kívül a mertos.hu oldalon lévő adatokkal is próbálom összehozni, a vágánytengely-távolság 
ezen a szakaszon 25-26 méter körüli. https://metros.hu/html_php/articles_budapest_m3_metro_characteristics.php
gymate (2025-08-23 11:21:21+00:00): Szuper – köszi szépen, hogy javítod! :)

Legközelebb esetleg fel tudod majd tüntetni a módosítások forrását a changeset tagjei közt? Illetve ha a nyomvonalakat módosítod, akkor, kérlek, rakj egy fixme taget a peronokra, hogy lássuk, át kell mozgatni őket az új nyomvonalra.
gymate (2025-08-23 11:22:26+00:00): A Kálvin téri peronokat javítottam is.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-10-11 23:35:46+00:00): DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159122
fortera_au (2025-08-01 23:46:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 169841222, 169841249, 169841240, 169841260, 169841200, 169841256, 169841237, 169841215, 169841214, 169841228, 169841245, 169841232 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: incompatible source
Langlaeufer (2025-07-23 20:33:32+00:00): bicycle=no auf Fußwegen ist überflüssig. Das wird nur erfasst wenn Radfahren auch explizit verboten wurde.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169321794
Stephan-4711 (2025-07-24 04:54:16+00:00): Dort wurde fälschlicherweise vorher ein bicyle=yes gesetzt, wie lösche ich denn dann den Tag korrekt?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169321794
Langlaeufer (2025-07-24 05:25:27+00:00): Einfach entfernen
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169321794
Langlaeufer (2025-07-23 20:32:12+00:00): Hallo Stefan, ein Fußweg ist primär für Fußgänger da d.h. foot=designated. das ist default und muss nicht hinzugefügt werden.  foot=yes ist hier weniger präzise
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169321859
fortera_au (2025-08-01 23:47:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 169841222, 169841249, 169841240, 169841260, 169841200, 169841256, 169841237, 169841215, 169841214, 169841228, 169841245, 169841232 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: incompatible source
vrix (2025-11-22 13:58:25+00:00): Hey Aleksandar could you please double check this changeset? I think something broke with the Lemont relation, it's not searchable on Nominatim anymore https://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/ui/details.html?osmtype=R&osmid=124883
forestjohnson (2025-07-23 04:53:51+00:00): Oh snap I saw someone already added this, my bad.  The name is not printed on the map (openstreetmap.org UI)  so I missed it.

Maybe it should be moved over so the map software will display the name. Magers and quinn  and the eyeware store can be moved back to make space.
ljc_jlyb (2025-07-23 16:29:01+00:00): Please keep your changesets regional. Its boundary box spans from Moscow to Primorsky Krai. It should be avoided since it will affect everyone querying recent changesets made in the rectangular  area, even if you made absolutely no edits there. It makes it harder to search for changes that were actually made in a specific area. 
Это сообщение было переведено машинным способом. Пожалуйста, сохраняйте региональность ваших наборов изменений. Его границы простираются от Москвы до Приморского края. Этого следует избегать, поскольку это повлияет на всех, кто запрашивает последние наборы изменений, сделанные в прямоугольной области, даже если вы не вносили в нее абсолютно никаких изменений. Это затрудняет поиск изменений, которые действительно были внесены в определенную область.
KhoraKavat (2025-07-24 02:29:27+00:00): Поняла, спасибо! Я буду аккуратнее.
Got it, thanks! I'll be more careful.
Leo Slager (2025-07-23 13:14:43+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
pitscheplatsch (2025-07-23 16:37:17+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169343444
NeisBot (2025-07-23 05:36:33+00:00): Hi jeshu luque, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Added a new park by creating a way and associated nodes, tagging it as a leisure area."

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish #AIgenerated
pitscheplatsch (2025-07-23 06:40:16+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169323575
felipeeugenio (2025-07-23 14:29:27+00:00): Thanks, guys.
He made another 4 edits, all fictitious parks. All were reversed.

regards
pitscheplatsch (2025-07-23 16:38:03+00:00): Thanks for reverting felipeeugenio
pitscheplatsch (2025-07-23 16:36:51+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169343444
felipeeugenio (2025-07-23 12:17:00+00:00): Se eliminan ediciones vandálicas. Probalemente hechas para sacar provecho de alguna app tipo pokemon.
Yog Sot (2025-07-23 10:57:22+00:00): yoyo, rozumiem potrzebe stosowania `living_street=yes` ale ta specifikacja ma status `in use`, podczas gdy `highway=living_street` ma `approved`. 
Z tego względu zmiana jest nieprawidłowa, bede wyzofywał, chyba masz jakies argumenty dla ogólnospełecznej dyskusji
Yog Sot (2025-07-23 11:35:25+00:00): więc błędów w zakresie na pewno nie residential jako dojazd do ogródków i na pewno nie private, bo wstęp jest wolny na folwark
Aim311_ (2025-07-27 05:23:43+00:00): Na drogach dojazdowych do folwarku masz zakaz wjazdu dla pojazdów i jakiś dopisek, że to prywatny teren. Brama miejska na dojeździe też nie pasuje.
user_5359 (2025-07-23 07:49:19+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice the name of a street is part of the way not of a node. And please don't use abbrevation on street name.
Baloo Uriza (2025-07-23 13:31:16+00:00): You have incorrectly degraded data by removing the existing turn lanes tag, which was already accurate.  Lyft, please stop all lane tagging activities, none of your edits in Oklahoma for this have been valid.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169324610
manjurawat_Lyft (2025-07-28 11:11:06+00:00): Hi Baloo Uriza,

My name is Manju, and I'm a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. Thank you for your comment.
I agree that deleting the correct `turn:lanes` value was a mistake on my part, and I appreciate you fixing it. However, you also removed turn lane tags from segment w430841507, which contradicts the rules outlined in the wiki regarding indication.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:turn#:~:text=the%20first%20indication%20via%20road%20markings%2C%20signposts%20or%20similar%20indications
According to the wiki, a split should occur where the lane count or `turn:lanes` conditions change. On this specific segment, a left turn appears earlier.


Could you please explain why you didn't follow the wiki guidelines?

Best regards,
Manju
Baloo Uriza (2025-07-29 12:13:54+00:00): In this case, it's not inconsistent with the wiki.  The turn lanes apply to the ends of the way, if there's a split where the lanes don't apply for that direction, then turn:lanes is removed from the way where those no longer apply. There needs to be an intersection at the end of the way for the turn:lanes tag to be relevant or consumed correctly by existing software.
amakarevich_lyft (2025-07-31 10:04:51+00:00): Hi Baloo Uriza,

We’ve created a topic on OSM community forum to engage a wider discussion on this topic:

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/consensus-regarding-lane-and-turn-lane-tagging-guidelines/133364#:~:text=2.2.-,We%20also%20encountered,-inconsistencies%20in%20where

Best regards, Artem
julcnx (2026-06-16 04:00:54+00:00): Hi, some of the ways tagged `surface=clay` in this changeset appear to be laterite roads. `surface=laterite` was approved on 2026-06-15 and describes this surface more precisely. Would you be comfortable retagging? Happy to do it if you prefer. More info: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface=laterite
NeisBot (2025-07-23 06:39:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-07-27 09:57:38+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/169327888
Syl (2025-07-23 09:24:51+00:00): Bonjour, je viens de modifier l'adresse et le type d'entrée. Plusieurs des attributs utilisés n'avaient pas l'air correctes.
ciaoQuentin (2025-07-25 13:06:16+00:00): Ce n'est pas un nœud "adresse" plutôt qu'une "entrée/sortie" qu'il faut ajouter ?
Syl (2025-07-28 21:50:50+00:00): Apparemment l'adresse peut-être mise directement sur l'entrée dans certains cas : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:entrance#Entr%C3%A9es_et_adresses
En tout cas il y a maintenant deux fois le numéros 26 ici, à toi de voir lequel des deux tu veux garder.

Le principal problème c'était l'utilisation de l'attribut "addr:flats". Il sert à indiquer des numéros d'appartement pas le numéro de la rue. J'ai vu que tu l'as utilisé plusieurs fois depuis avec le numéro de la rue. Je ne sais pas pourquoi Every Door te le propose mais il y a quelque chose qui ne va avec cette façon de l'utiliser.
ciaoQuentin (2025-07-28 23:08:18+00:00): Je vais essayer d'apprivoiser encore un peu every door. Merci pour tes retours.
Leo Slager (2025-07-23 13:16:17+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
aceman444 (2025-10-11 12:45:13+00:00): Zdravim, po tej cyklotrase mozu chodit aj chodci a tuto informaciu ste stratili ked ste len zmenili footway na cycleway. Opravil som.
pza (2025-07-27 05:59:18+00:00): Did you intentionally move the shop Gong Cha?  If so, you accidently moved a bunch of foot ways which were linked to the node.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169327017
無限の刃 (2025-12-12 07:15:01+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:名称#name_は名称だけ
Warin61 (2025-12-27 02:08:29+00:00): Hi
Where the bicycles use a traffic light controlled oedestrian crossing and there is no bicycle light  .. then the tagg should be bicycle=dismount. Only where there is a red/green light for a bicycle can there be bicycle=yes such as at the Epping Rd to Pembroke St lights.
RobotFK (2025-07-23 07:38:55+00:00): Nicht survery sondern Hinweis , sorry
Christian Perrier (2025-07-26 07:49:12+00:00): Sérieux ?
Il n'y a absolument jamais eu de sentier ici. L'ortho photo IGN le montre bien et on le verrait sur le 360° depuis l'Aiguillette : https://panoramax.openstreetmap.fr/?s=fp;s2;p9fbfa173-0f64-46e1-a741-5fb12c121f7a;c345.99/-22.07/75;m17/45.921464/6.805075;bs

Ajouter ainsi des "sentiers" uniquement grâce à la heatmap Strava sans vérifier l'information plus précisément est inutile et inconscient, je suis désolé de le dire.
Christian Perrier (2025-07-26 07:50:59+00:00): Légère correction : il peut y avoir eu une trace dans le passé (d'où la heatmap légèrement accentuée à cet endroit), mais il n'y a actuellement absolument RIEN sur le terrain.

(in case you don't understand French, feel free to answer in English)
eultra (2025-07-28 12:01:39+00:00): Pardon, je me suis un peu emporte. Je le revert. 

Ou, comme il y a des traces à cet endroit, il serait peut-être préférable de les marquer comme étant hors service.
Christian Perrier (2025-07-29 05:29:50+00:00): Merci pour la réponse et mes excuses pour le message initial un peu "raide", mais malheureusement les cas d'ajouts basés uniquement sur la heatmap et qui ne correspondent à rien sur le terrain, semblent de plus en plus fréquents et provoquent des dérives actuellement discutées sur https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/problemes-de-cotation-de-difficulte-de-chemins/, notamment parce que ces sentiers n'ont souvent aucun tag sur leur difficulté ou leur visibilité réelle sur le terrain.

Dans le cas présent, le mieux est probablement de tagguer en "abandoned:highway=path" (ce qui permettra d'éviter que le sentier soit recréé par quelqu'un lors d'une action Maproulette Strava).
eultra (2025-07-29 06:43:18+00:00): Pas de problem. Je sais assez francais pour comprendre, mais pas assez pour être deranger. Pour les traces, something is better than nothing, c'est un problem pour les moteurs de routage a decider décider quand il y a une heatmap et une piste abandonnée.

J'ai plus d'expérience avec d'ajoutes correct à partir le heatmap être supprimé par les gens qui souhaitent garder leurs traces secrètes. Si tu veux lire un tres colere vététiste, cette thread est tres amusant: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mapping-is-not-neutral-why-adding-unsanctioned-mtb-trails-endangers-access-and-potentially-lives/132886
pyrog (2025-11-03 17:05:18+00:00): Bonsoir,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1416688863 correspond uniquement à une trace Strava. Il est absent de la carte IGN, des orthophotos de 2020, 2023 et 2025.

Je le "désactive" avec un préfixe.

Cordialement,
Yves — Groupe OSM Plein Air
woodpeck (2025-07-23 23:02:51+00:00): Hallo Frau Mauthner, vermutlich gibt es hier ein Missverständnis. Wenn Sie schreiben "hier ist kein Weg", dann meinen Sie, "hier ist kein Wegerecht für die Öffentlchkeit" - denn dass dort eine asphaltierte Fläche zum Zwecke der Bewegung von Fahrzeugen ist, das sieht jeder auf dem Luftbild. Bei OpenStreetMap ist ein "Weg" aber genau das. Wer da laufen/fahren darf, das tragen wir als zusätzliche Information ein. 

Der von Ihnen hier (erneut) gelöschte Weg war bereits mit der Zusatzinformation "Privatweg" versehen. Durch Ihre Löschung ist diese Information verloren gegangen, und sobald jemand den Weg vom Luftbild abmalt (auf dem ihn wie gesagt jeder erkennen kann), haben Sie das gleiche Problem wieder.

Die Sache ist im Detail hier erklärt: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F

Bitte sehen Sie von weiteren Löschungen ab; sie beschädigen damit unsere Daten und Sie verstoßen gegen unsere Benutzungsbedingungen.
Sylabowy Kot (2025-07-23 08:18:29+00:00): .
Muhmaker (2025-11-23 11:09:00+00:00): Hallo Brummi2021, laut Presseberichten sollten die Bauarbeiten auf der Rheinberger Straße in Budberg nur bis Anfang August 2025 dauern. In OSM ist sie aber immer noch gesperrt. Weißt du wie die Situation vor Ort ist?
FMC-Henri (2025-08-06 13:53:52+00:00): Hier scheint etwas nicht ganz zu stimmen. Der Herrfurthplatz ist keine Fahrradstraße, aber du hast das traffic sign DE:244.1 hinzugefügt. Kannst du das nochmal anschauen?
fortera_au (2025-08-01 23:47:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 169841222, 169841249, 169841240, 169841260, 169841200, 169841256, 169841237, 169841215, 169841214, 169841228, 169841245, 169841232 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: incompatible source
amosharper (2025-07-23 08:20:51+00:00): (and modified coffee room "cuisine" tags to correct mispelling and use more common values)
Leo Slager (2025-07-23 13:21:26+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Leo Slager (2025-07-23 13:25:29+00:00): Hallo SLG_Lott_Ballering,

Het pad stond al correct op de kaart met bicycle=no.

Helaas zijn er altijd mensen die zich daar niets van aantrekken.
Een verkeersbord C1 of een bordje "eigen weg, verboden toegang" schrikt misschien meer af.
NeisRevert (2025-07-25 04:59:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/169431579
where the changeset comment is: 
Remove test edits
fortera_au (2025-08-01 23:47:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 169841222, 169841249, 169841240, 169841260, 169841200, 169841256, 169841237, 169841215, 169841214, 169841228, 169841245, 169841232 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: incompatible source
StC (2025-07-23 08:52:18+00:00): Hello,

ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre. Je m'occupe de la réparation.
streckenkundler (2025-07-23 13:37:20+00:00): Bitte bei sowas nicht einfach löschen! Da wird neu gebaut. Die Brücke war korrekt als highway=construction erfasst. Es ist nicht umsonst rechts uns links der Spree landuse=construction erfasst. Ich hab die Elemente wieder. Beim Löschen solcher Elemente hat man es viel viel schwerer, das nachzuverfolgen. 
Danke fürs Verständnis.

streckenkundler
streckenkundler (2025-07-23 13:48:55+00:00): Da vorher alles korrekt erfasst war: Wiederstellungs-CS: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169345193
evgenykatyshev (2025-07-23 13:38:06+00:00): Innacurate edit with deletetion existed objects based only on iD validator without any validation on the ground or local knowledge. To be reverted.
evgenykatyshev (2025-07-23 14:18:24+00:00): Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169346238