piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
theDM (2025-08-05 05:48:04+00:00): Plany przestrzenne może będą zrealizowane kiedyś, może nie. Podaj źródła,  że te konkretne drogi są do budowy w najbliższym czasie, a nie kiedyś tam.
theDM (2025-08-05 05:51:52+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:highway%3Dproposed
"Skasowanie drogi highway=proposed, w przypadku której nie można ustalić, że ma rzeczywiście być zbudowana, jest prawidłowe."
Mieliśmy też dyskusję na forum na ten temat, tak samo jak wcześniej przewijało się to samo na Discordzie OSM.
Barroszt (2025-08-05 08:24:18+00:00): Dziękuje
theDM (2025-08-05 10:34:31+00:00): Jeżeli masz info, że jakieś drogi są na geoportalu, ale nie jest planowana ich budowa w najbliższym czasie, to je usuń.
DaveF (2025-08-04 12:56:36+00:00): Reverting changeset. Please don't make OSM less detailed & accurate.
andyonthewings (2025-08-04 13:06:49+00:00): Hi. All the original data is still there in my revision. I only extracted the restaurant from the building, so they are seperated OSM elements.

I did that because the restaurant is not occupying the whole building, so it's more natual to use seperated elements.
andyonthewings (2025-08-04 13:10:05+00:00): FYI, I also added `contact:facebook`, `contact:instagram` and `wikimedia_commons` tags to the restaurant. So technically there are more detail in my revision.
Zarr (2025-08-03 22:02:08+00:00): oh I meant off of the main sidewalk way
JJIglesias (2025-08-04 06:18:03+00:00): Las caminerías dentro de una plaza NO SON ACERAS (sidewalks) son footways.
Gracias
BigKev97 (2025-10-06 15:42:24+00:00): Es un placer.
jeslop (2025-08-04 10:21:03+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169946104
jeslop (2025-08-04 10:21:04+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169946104
jeslop (2025-08-04 10:21:05+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169946104
jeslop (2025-08-04 10:21:06+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169946104
jeslop (2025-08-04 10:26:20+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169946375
jeslop (2025-08-04 10:29:12+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169946529
jeslop (2025-08-04 10:26:21+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169946375
jeslop (2025-08-04 10:29:13+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169946529
jeslop (2025-08-04 10:26:22+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169946375
jeslop (2025-08-04 10:29:14+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169946529
jeslop (2025-08-04 10:26:23+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169946375
jeslop (2025-08-04 10:33:23+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169946764
jeslop (2025-08-04 10:26:24+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169946375
jeslop (2025-08-04 10:33:24+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169946764
jeslop (2025-08-04 10:36:37+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169946985
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-04 08:05:26+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/52226150/history has logainm:url = No entry that was added in this edit
What is the point of adding this value? Is it OK to just remove it?
VictorIE (2026-02-04 10:42:26+00:00): Hi,

In Ireland, place and street names, etc. are a mess. Many rural roads have no name. Many roads have more than one name or more than one spelling. Many roads, especially new ones in housing estates, have ambiguous names. Many addresses do not match the name of the road. OSM has large gaps, but is actually one of the better places for nuanced names.

Logainm (in the Irish language, loga + ainm = logbook + name): www.logainm.ie is a university-based project on place names, in association with the government's The Placenames Branch: https://www.gov.ie/en/department-of-rural-and-community-development-and-the-gaeltacht/organisation-information/the-placenames-branch/ Logainm has a series of sister projects for similar topics.

The Irish chapter of OSM collaborates with Logainm, insofar as we report issues with names, e.g. etymology, mis-interpretations, mis-spellings, duplicate entries, missing entries. In turn, they provide us with the proper spellings and use OSM on their site. There is a issue with Logainm, insofar as official sources have gaps when it comes to things like the names of bridges, roundabouts, cross roads, etc. and new names. logainm:ref=No entry and logainm:url=No entry exist because of these gaps. They are a way to identify gaps in Logainm and stops OSM users from repeatedly looking for an entry that doesn't exist - this can be time consuming, as many names are repeated, e.g. "The Court" seems to apply to 2,087 different roads.

There are 92,455 objects tagged logainm:ref=*. There are 80,156 objects tagged logainm:url=*. I suspect the main difference is with waterway=*.

I would be strongly against removing such a value, unless it is replaced by a correct value.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-11 18:44:53+00:00): Can I comment your comment onto wiki, under license Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 ?

I would add it to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:logainm:url%3DNo_entry so that other people are not confused
VictorIE (2026-02-11 19:01:23+00:00): Yes, copy away. :)
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-12 08:10:59+00:00): Added to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:logainm:url%3DNo_entry
VictorIE (2026-02-12 16:09:33+00:00): Thanks.
jeslop (2025-08-04 10:36:38+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169946985
jeslop (2025-08-04 10:36:39+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169946985
jeslop (2025-08-04 10:38:13+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169947078
jeslop (2025-08-04 10:38:14+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169947078
cuzi (2025-08-14 13:15:50+00:00): Hi, you added a monument here, someone else created a note about it, could you take a look and reply at:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4908763
jeslop (2025-08-04 10:38:15+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169947078
jeslop (2025-08-04 10:41:03+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169947273
jeslop (2025-08-04 10:41:04+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169947273
jeslop (2025-08-04 10:41:05+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169947273
jeslop (2025-08-04 10:45:35+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169947545
jeslop (2025-08-04 10:45:36+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169947545
jeslop (2025-08-04 10:46:52+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169947606
jeslop (2025-08-04 10:46:53+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169947606
neo-plan (2025-08-03 23:54:38+00:00): *Заборы тоже снесены
jeslop (2025-08-04 11:09:44+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169948943
jeslop (2025-08-04 11:09:45+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169948943
jeslop (2025-08-04 11:09:46+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169948943
jeslop (2025-08-04 11:16:20+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169949280
jeslop (2025-08-04 11:16:21+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169949280
jeslop (2025-08-04 11:18:04+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169949379
jeslop (2025-08-04 11:18:05+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169949379
jeslop (2025-08-04 12:42:18+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169953672
jeslop (2025-08-04 12:41:08+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169953599
jeslop (2025-08-04 11:54:54+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169951277
jeslop (2025-08-04 11:31:15+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169950074
jeslop (2025-08-04 12:38:40+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169953449
jeslop (2025-08-04 11:30:58+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169950058
jeslop (2025-08-04 08:06:47+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169939464
jeslop (2025-08-04 08:06:48+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169939464
user_5359 (2025-08-04 06:38:44+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Don't over paint existing streets!
jorlan0626 (2025-08-04 13:16:22+00:00): Sorry, I don’t understand your comment. What does over paint existing streets mean?
user_5359 (2025-08-04 18:13:53+00:00): You can see the newly drawn paths in the change list on version 1. 

Unfortunately, I cannot show you any images, but the trained eye could see that two paths were almost in the same position.
jeslop (2025-08-04 08:06:49+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169939464
jeslop (2025-08-04 08:06:50+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169939464
jeslop (2025-08-04 08:06:51+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169939464
citrula (2025-08-04 01:41:37+00:00): This edit added the gate in the middle of Main Street - it would have blocked routers. I went ahead and fixed this for you by putting the gate in the proper location. Happy mapping!
geosteven (2025-08-05 01:56:53+00:00): Thank you for making the adjustment.
citrula (2025-08-04 16:46:56+00:00): welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contribution. Instead of drawing a duplicate way on top of the existing one, you should split the existing one - you can do this by selecting a node and right clicking.

Happy mapping!
Ashes SAF (2025-08-04 01:49:01+00:00): Details wrong. I forgot to edit them before I uploaded. The comment should be out and about. Added toilet and store
felipeeugenio (2025-08-04 12:47:33+00:00): Hola. Las casas se pueden cuadrar con la letra Q. Estas están claramente hechas a pulso.

Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169930668
tallcoleman (2025-08-14 12:14:05+00:00): Thanks for checking this washroom! Would "May-Oct Mo-Su 09:00-sunset; Nov-Apr off" make sense for opening_hours given your note?
skfd (2025-08-14 19:33:46+00:00): sure! this is pretty niche tagging anyway, but data is correct
tallcoleman (2025-08-15 14:33:16+00:00): thanks, updated 👍
NeisReview (2025-08-04 15:21:11+00:00): #NameTag

Hello, and welcome to OSM.

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I’ve taken a look at your recent edits, especially those involving name tags. Some of the names you’ve added caught my attention, as they seem a bit unusual. As noted in the OSM Wiki, the name tag should contain only the actual name of the feature—not descriptions, types, locations, family names, addresses, or other attributes.

Could you please confirm whether these entries were intentional or possibly added by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

---
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:name
jonce007 (2025-08-04 15:57:02+00:00): I don't know the rules well. 
But I'll take time to read 
"osm.wiki/Key:name" to try to understand it.
ZLima12 (2025-08-04 08:49:23+00:00): Hi,

Unfortunately, I've had to revert this changeset and several other similar ones that you've made in the area lately. Ocean Parkway is definitely not a motorway, as it has uncontrolled property access in many places. In addition, it is not important enough to be at the trunk/motorway level.

Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169939717 for more details and to discuss any of these changes further.
Daniil Musatov (2025-08-05 15:18:37+00:00): Вы случайно название памятника навесили на жилой район. Исправьте, пожалуйста.
Gregory Peony (2025-08-06 02:29:14+00:00): Hi, all footprints you added here represent buildings visible in the imagery and you correctly distinguished between round and square buildings. Good job improving the accuracy of existing footprints; please modify existing data where possible instead of deleting and re mapping. Use shift+(-/+) to scale selected features in ID, right click for other editing options. Building foorptins are oversized; the square one is only minimally so. It looks like you referenced Bing which is good; do you know how to offset/align imagery sources? --- See how I mapped these buildings in https://osmcha.org/changesets/170033976 Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169931671
eggie (2025-08-04 06:56:17+00:00): Hi... Thx for your contribution. Please ude the present addressnode to tag on.
I merged your info.

Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2025-08-04 06:55:39+00:00): Hi... Thx for your contribution. Please ude the present addressnode to tag on.
I merged your info.

Greetz,
eggie
gurglypipe (2025-08-04 10:04:11+00:00): Heya, are you sure Brierholme guest house is trading? They were removed from the map by (I think) the owners last year (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152038550) and their website says they’ve closed (https://www.brierholme.co.uk/).
gurglypipe (2025-08-12 13:24:02+00:00): No response ⇒ I guess this can wait until someone next StreetCompletes this area
eggie (2025-08-04 06:54:53+00:00): Hi... Thx for your contribution. Please ude the present addressnode to tag in.
I merged your info.

Greetz,
eggie
pitscheplatsch (2025-08-04 05:43:21+00:00): #NameTag

Hello, and welcome to OSM.

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I’ve taken a look at your recent edits, especially those involving name tags. Some of the names you’ve added caught my attention, as they seem a bit unusual. As noted in the OSM Wiki, the name tag should contain only the actual name of the feature—not descriptions, types, locations, family names, addresses, or other attributes.

Could you please confirm whether these entries were intentional or possibly added by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

---
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:name
Taya_S (2025-08-17 10:21:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted DWG Ticket#2025081710000139
Addresses have been incorrectly added as name, no sources are cited and were reported as nonsensical, and the user does not communicate. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18623

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170558601
pitscheplatsch (2025-08-04 05:43:27+00:00): #NameTag

Hello, and welcome to OSM.

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I’ve taken a look at your recent edits, especially those involving name tags. Some of the names you’ve added caught my attention, as they seem a bit unusual. As noted in the OSM Wiki, the name tag should contain only the actual name of the feature—not descriptions, types, locations, family names, addresses, or other attributes.

Could you please confirm whether these entries were intentional or possibly added by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

---
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:name
mavl (2025-08-04 15:11:58+00:00): Здравствуйте. Это пакет правок испортил отношения ограничения движения, удалив из него роль.  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19188267/history
buy_osmand (2025-08-04 04:46:44+00:00): 😳👍 Good,
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169932944
Rapoti99 (2025-08-08 12:10:31+00:00): Warum auf einer Bahnstrecke "highway=cycleway"?
HellMap (2025-09-07 18:39:35+00:00): Hi, please be aware that OSM does not follow official classification exactly and rather builds a logical road network based on function and use. For example, don't change small deadend roads to high classification or downgrade roads when they form network connections between classes. Official classification is a starting point and these often match, but these are also wrong, especially on municipality level. OSM instead builds a hierarchical network where road class gradually branches out based on how the roads are actually used and what they actually connect.
Taya_S (2025-08-17 10:21:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted DWG Ticket#2025081710000139
Addresses have been incorrectly added as name, no sources are cited and were reported as nonsensical, and the user does not communicate. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18623

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170558601
lankapuhelin (2025-08-21 12:23:59+00:00): Hyvää työtä kentän uusien virkistysrakennelmien merkitsemisessä!
b4en (2025-11-27 09:27:41+00:00): Здравствуйте! Откуда взялось это название для вершины, кто источник?
dankarran (2025-08-07 10:35:30+00:00): Wikipedia suggests St Helier is a town rather than a city https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St_Helier
Ansderer (2025-08-17 05:29:44+00:00): Do we use Wikipedia as a source?
Ansderer (2025-08-17 05:30:03+00:00): I had used a source from Bing.
dankarran (2025-08-19 12:17:38+00:00): Yes, I believe Wikipedia can be used as a reference and source of truth, though information shouldn't be copied from it directly.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Collaboration_with_Wikipedia
Fizzie-DWG (2025-10-23 06:21:06+00:00): DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173657043
BaboucheVerte (2026-04-24 04:25:34+00:00): Hi, I've fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181745249 several issue you introduced:
- change the road from a primary road to a foot path (ie forbidden to car ...)
- fixed the opening_hours syntax of your clinic
The note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4866268 to indicate the clinic was at a different location (few meters away, o the other side of the road), what's the real position ?

You can find help from the indian OSM community to help you.
NeisReview (2025-08-04 15:20:39+00:00): #NameTag

Hello, and welcome to OSM.

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I’ve taken a look at your recent edits, especially those involving name tags. Some of the names you’ve added caught my attention, as they seem a bit unusual. As noted in the OSM Wiki, the name tag should contain only the actual name of the feature—not descriptions, types, locations, family names, addresses, or other attributes.

Could you please confirm whether these entries were intentional or possibly added by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

---
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:name
pesticides (2025-08-04 06:30:16+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4664278
ivanbranco (2025-08-12 18:46:49+00:00): Ciao, hai cambiato il POI da The Green Sheep a Buffalo Grill & Pub, ma non hai cambiato il codice fiscale. E' giusto così o è stato un errore?

Grazie e buon mapping
Zedimet (2025-08-12 18:56:21+00:00): Ciao, purtroppo non ho questa informazione. L'applicazione da cui ho segnalato la modifica (sono un noon) non visualizza nemmeno quella proprietà, per quello non mi sono posto il problema. 
È ragionevole pensare che non sia corretta quella riportata ora.

Saluti
ivanbranco (2025-08-12 18:57:56+00:00): Grazie, cancello la partita iva (non codice fiscale) allora.
ivanbranco (2025-08-12 18:42:51+00:00): Ciao StelvioHike,

la fontana non è attiva, ma esiste? In tal caso si potrebbe segnare come inattiva invece di cancellarla.

grazie e buon mapping
user_5359 (2025-08-10 07:37:37+00:00): Hallo! Bitte schau dir mal den Knoten https://www.osm.org/node/13047697629 nochmal an. Welche Bedeutung hat das Tag payment:https://www.niemeyer-cigarren.d = yes ?
andwil (2025-08-10 18:32:56+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis, da ist irgendwas daneben gegangen. Hab's korrigiert.
stasiu512 (2025-08-04 08:47:53+00:00): Cześć stacja GDA114 została przeniesiona w to miejsce z okolic ul. Dywizjonu 303. W tym momencie mamy duplikacje - https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6484692653. Proponowałbym usunąć przez Ciebie dodany punkt, a stary przenieść w nowe miejsce dla zachowania historii. Wcześniej przenosiłem tak stacje GDA227 i chyba wszystko załapało.
Pozdrawiam :)
Marek-M (2025-08-04 08:56:19+00:00): Dzięki za weryfikację. Dodając te brakujące stacje Mevo szukam w promieniu kilkuset metrów jakie są disused albo istniejące. Tutaj niczego nie znalazłem, więc uznałem, że to nowa stacja. Uważam, że masz rację z propozycją przeniesienia starej stacji GDA114 w nową lokalizację i usunąć mój nowy węzeł.
stasiu512 (2025-08-04 09:16:31+00:00): Przeniosłem starszy punkt w nowe miejsce - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169942653
Marek-M (2025-08-04 09:18:34+00:00): Dzięki!
eggie (2025-08-04 07:16:11+00:00): reverted by changeset #169937290
eggie (2025-08-04 07:15:04+00:00): reverted by changeset #169937249
eggie (2025-08-04 07:12:59+00:00): Beste Ytsen 

Je verwijdert zonder overleg wegen uit OSM.
Dit is niet de bedoeling.
De wegen stonden op access private en zullen dus niet routeren.
Ook hulpdiensten als brandweer en ambulance maken gebruik van OSM en dus ook van privewegen. 
Ze kunnen dus van belang zijn bij calamiteiten. 
Ik draai de verwijderingen weer terug. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-08-04 07:14:11+00:00): reverted by changeset #169937208
Ytsen1 (2025-08-05 07:28:15+00:00):  Hoi Eggie,

Bedankt voor je reactie. Ik begrijp dat OpenStreetMap een zo volledig mogelijke kaart wil tonen, maar ik wil duidelijk maken dat dit pad over mijn privéterrein loopt en dat ik geen toestemming geef voor opname in een publieke kaart.

Het pad is géén openbare weg, maar een landbouwkavelpad op eigen grond dat uitsluitend gebruikt wordt voor mijn werkzaamheden met vee en machines.

Omdat het op OSM staat, wordt het overgenomen in route-apps voor wandelaars en fietsers, wat leidt tot structurele overlast en gevaarlijke situaties met vee en landbouwvoertuigen.

Ik wil dan ook dat het pad volledig van de kaart verdwijnt. Volgens mij is het juridisch niet toegestaan om zonder toestemming een ‘weg’ op particulier terrein in te tekenen, zeker als dit leidt tot onrechtmatig gebruik van mijn eigendom.

Met alle respect voor het OSM-project: ik verzoek dringend om het pad niet terug te plaatsen. Ik wil dit zo nodig verder juridisch laten toetsen, want het gaat hier om mijn eigendomsrechten en mijn veiligheid.

Met vriendelijke groet,
Ytsen
eggie (2025-08-05 07:50:58+00:00): Beste Ytsen,

Het is gewoon toegestaan om objecten en dus ook wegen toe te voegen door de community van OSM.
Zie link naar policy OSM. 
Het is wel zaak dat access=private wordt toegevoegd als dit staat aangegeven en/of duidelijk is dat de paden over privegrond lopen.
Alle paden staan op access=private en zullen daarom ook minder renderen op de kaart. Routeren zullen ze ook niet... ook niet voor wandelaars. 
Ze kunnen dus ook niet worden opgenomen in routingapps. 
Wanneer paden worden verwijderd zullen deze toch weer ingetekend worden, maar wellicht dan met onjuiste accesstags.
De paden zijn ook nergens verbonden met doorgaande wegen. 
Op de erven zijn geen wegen getekend. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_foot&route=53.13351%2C5.98407%3B53.13676%2C5.99163

Ik volg als validator de policy van OSM.

Zie voor privacyregels :  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mapping_private_information

Maar nogmaals .. wanneer u ze verwijdert komen ze wellicht terug met onjuiste accesstags en gaat het juist routeren. 
Mijn advies zou zijn het gewoon zo te laten.  Het voorkomt opnieuw intekenen. De tracks zijn nauwelijks te zien (access=private) en routeren doet het allemaal niet. 


Met vriendelijke groet, 
eggie
validator