piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2026-01-27 12:56:32+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback   Maar op dit wegstuk mag niemand komen. Je tagt access=no  Dat is Verboden Toegang.
Welk bord staat hier vooraan?
Hoe zit met met mofa en moped?
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-01-27 13:01:39+00:00): Staan er wellicht paaltjes;  barrier=bollard?
access=no heb ik verwijderd.
eggie (2026-01-27 13:14:24+00:00): https://viewer.satellietdataportaal.nl/@52.33711,5.521782,20/?datastrip=20251117_PNEO-04
Michel321 (2026-01-27 13:14:27+00:00): Bedankt voor het nakijken en corrigeren! Het is een fiets en wandelpad geworden en versmald. Aan beide zijden van de Parel zijn paaltjes geplaatst er geen voertuig meer in kan rijden.
eggie (2026-01-27 13:20:00+00:00): Oke...  Dan kun je het wellicht zelf omtaggen naar highway=path
bicycle=yes foot=yes
evt motor_vegicle=no als er ook geen moped en mofa overmogen.
surface=???  paving_stones ?
maxspeed 30 kan er denk ik af.
Paaltjes kun je toevoegen op nodes verbonden met de weg met barrier=bollard
bollard=????  fixed, removable, flexible
Zie wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dbollard

Staat er geen verkeersbord? 

Mapse,
eggie
mueschel (2026-01-27 14:20:33+00:00): Hi,
please check this and some other edits, they got strange tags like:


operator_w 	Q105867772
osm_id 	1305941580
osm_type 	way
full_id 	w1305941580
Waaslander (2026-01-27 14:35:12+00:00): Thanks for the heads up!
mueschel (2026-02-02 10:58:24+00:00): Hi,
I'd recommend not to put a date suffix on each and every tag. This is rather messy, and not well supported by tools.

Just a "disused:amenity" together with an "end_date" would be much cleaner.
eggie (2026-01-27 13:40:29+00:00): Dag Joris,

access=alleen lijnbussen is geen valide tag.
Dit zijn de defaulttags
Implies

    motor_vehicle=no
    bus=yes
    foot=yes
    bicycle=yes
en de wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dbus_trap

Mogen moped en mofa er wel door?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-01-27 13:45:23+00:00): access=alleen lijnbussen  verwijderd.
moped en mofa yes toegevoegd
NeisBot (2026-01-28 06:56:31+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13504099949 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Dental clinic"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-05 06:18:38+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178122994
(No visible changes after review)
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-22 10:05:54+00:00): Split SEO POI "Agence WAM Mulhouse" out to separate POI node rather than nested building inside building that is not a separate structure or housenumber, and fixed/cleaned up remaining SEO and malformed tagging, in changeset 184424553

https://osm.org/changeset/184424553
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-08 02:35:11+00:00): Revert SEO spam addition of POI to multipolygon relation, merge duplicate POIs, and remove/clean up SEO tags for POI "Bro Barber's" in changeset 183805725

https://osm.org/changeset/183805725
TinPetreković (2026-01-28 06:27:31+00:00): Roads that were split unnecessarily have been merged back together in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177790714
arjunaraoc (2026-03-20 05:30:39+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177762975
rempshaener (2026-01-29 18:20:53+00:00): Hallo,
eine Anmerkung zu deinen Bearbeitungen:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1472335854: Das Taggen von „Vorplätzen“ von Garagen als Parkplatz ist eher unüblich. Wenn man wirklich meint, das wäre ein Parkplatz, müsste mindestens access=private ergänzt. Die Tendenz ist eher, so was gar nicht zu erfassen oder einen Weg zu erfassen, dessen Fläche mit area:highway umfasst wird.

Viele Grüße
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-08 02:37:55+00:00): Removed SEO spam and cleaned up other tags for POI in changeset 183805770

https://osm.org/changeset/183805770
Dodko (2026-02-23 07:42:10+00:00): Please do not add a duplicate address to a POI if it is already registered in the building.
jbcharron (2026-01-27 18:40:40+00:00): Bonjour,
Pouvez-vous nous indiquer si l'itinéraire a changé ?
Car la Voie Bleue est correctement cartographié à l'aide de relations https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:route=bicycle, donc si une correction est a faire ce n'est pas ajouter le nom de l'itinéraire mais l'inclure dans la relation
A disposition, si besoin
Bonne soirée
Jean-Baptiste
Ville de Metz (2026-01-29 16:31:16+00:00): Bonjour, merci pour votre réaction. En réalité la Voie bleue va de lyon à la frontière du Luxembourg https://www.lavoiebleue.com/itineraire et dans le secteur de Metz qui nous concerne, il n'y a que deux poi. D'où ma demande d'ajout / modification. mais cela risque d'etre assez long.
jbcharron (2026-01-29 16:58:51+00:00): J'ai bien en tête que la voie bleue s'étant au dela de la Moselle, si le tracé a changé je peux tout a fait le corriger dans notre secteur, mais en tout cas rajouter le nom ne suffit pas pour l'inclure dans l'itinéraire cyclable complet
A disposition si besoin
Bonne soirée
Jean-Baptiste
jbcharron (2026-01-29 17:01:29+00:00): Et pour le nom du panneau modifié du côté de Scy-Chazelles, il est a modifié uniquement si le nom du panneau a changé sur le terrain
Ville de Metz (2026-01-29 17:22:06+00:00): OK bien entendu. Les panneaux doivent être changés.
Ils vous est donc possible d'ajouter / renommer les tronçons en Voie Bleue ?
jbcharron (2026-01-29 17:43:44+00:00): Avez vous une source utilisable pour ajuster les tronçons sur Metz ?
En tout cas le nom ne sera pas ajouté sur le chemin car a ma connaissance la voie bleue n'est que le nom de l'itinéraire, pas le nom du chemin (dénomination par arrêté municipal)
Par contre vous pouvez visualiser le trajet sur ce rendu dédié au itinéraires cyclables https://cycling.waymarkedtrails.org/#?map=14.0/49.116/6.1565
Ville de Metz (2026-01-29 19:15:23+00:00): Effectivement c'est déjà très précis. Ma seule source est https://www.lavoiebleue.com/itineraire et je crois que le tracé est déjà très bien représenté en réalité.
jbcharron (2026-01-30 17:13:30+00:00): Donc le chemin sur lequel vous avez ajouté le nom ne fait pas partie de l'itinéraire et semble mener à une propriété privée, il serait préférable que vous retiriez le nom, mais il n'est pas impossible que l'itinéraire change prochainement avec la future passerelle de Wadrinau

Je me permets aussi de réitérer mon invitation aux ateliers OSM organisés à l'Arob@ase dont le prochain aura lieu le samedi 21 février de 10:00 à 12:00 sur le thème des infrastructures cyclables.

Bonne soirée
Ville de Metz (2026-02-03 13:43:34+00:00): Bonjour, merci, bien vu. Effectivement c'est le simple chemin de halage vers le stock de matériaux.
Bien noté pour le rdv, je ferais mon possible, nous vous avons à l'agenda ! https://metz.fr/agenda/fiche-39791.php
eggie (2026-01-27 14:01:52+00:00): Oke.. als aan weerzijden paaltjes staan dan maak je een node (knoop) op de weg en daar tag je twee zaken op..
.. barrier=bollard en de specificatie bollard=fixed
Daarna ook aan de andere zijde.
Dat regeltje op het pad zelf over die paaltjes kan weg.
eggie (2026-01-27 14:03:42+00:00): Wanneer er ook mofa en moped zijn toegestaan dan motor_vehicle=no verwijderen
eggie (2026-01-27 14:40:42+00:00): Ik heb het als bovenstaand aangepast.
YomanNH (2026-01-28 07:28:51+00:00): Hej, jesteś pewny, że wszystkie te uliczki mają takie nazwy? Były tabliczki w terenie? Bo jeśli nie, to nazwy powinny być tylko na głównych drogach, tak jak było, a z te małe uliczki powinny zostać bez nazwy. Potwierdzają to również dane z Geoportalu.
paedc1 (2026-01-28 19:48:22+00:00): Hi! Unless I misunderstood https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/nazwy-odnog-ulic-osiedlowych/140460/2 ,  there are no rules here but rather preferences. I've replicated street name from address plates on the buildings. If there are indeed rules, can you please help me with the link to a wiki? Thank you!
paedc1 (2026-01-28 20:18:58+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177820220
spiregrain (2026-01-27 16:18:20+00:00): Are you sure about this?  I think it's West Ham Lane as far south as Abbey Road.   The Greyhound Pub and West Ham Lane Health Centre have addresses on West Ham Lane.   Street signage visible on Bing opposite the junction with Densham Road also indicates West Ham Lane.   First sighting of New Plaistow Road signage is on the side of the William Hill betting shop at 2 Church Street (e.g. just south of Abbey Road.
MacLondon (2026-01-27 21:16:50+00:00): I only changed the name at + to the SE of the Manor Rd junction. If you think the street name has also been wrong further up (i.e. NW of this junction), feel free to correct it.
spiregrain (2026-01-27 22:17:00+00:00): Done!  There were some old note= tags on those segments indicating that the street may have been mis-signed at some point.  Have added some streetside images of the current signage and updated.  cs 177782292.
osmmapper222 (2026-01-27 23:03:13+00:00): Hallo scharrel,

willkommen bei Openstreetmap. Mir ist aufgefallen, dass du bei Gebäuden den name-Tag genutzt hast, um diese wortwörtlich zu Beschreiben, z.B. bei einer Scheune [0] und Garage [1].

Der name-Tag wird üblicherweise nur gebraucht, wenn Gebäude einen gängigen Eigennamen haben, z.B. die "Max-Mustermann-Kirche".

Im OSM-Wiki [2] lassen sich zu den meisten Tags hilfreiche Artikel finden, falls dazu einmal Fragen aufkommen.


---

[0] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1471666617/history/1

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1471666618/history/2

[2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:name
osmmapper222 (2026-01-27 23:06:32+00:00): Für Gebäude und andere Örtlichkeiten gibt ja bereits eine Vielzahl an Tags, um diese semantsich zu beschreiben, z.B. building=barn oder building=garage.

Den name-Tag ist von beiden Gebäuden bereits entfernt.

Weiterhin viel Spaß beim Mappen auf OSM.

Viele Grüße,
osmmapper222
iamdavid (2026-02-01 12:03:33+00:00): Bei highway=footway ist foot=yes unnötig
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177764364
iamdavid (2026-02-01 12:04:18+00:00): Bei highway=footway ist foot=yes unnötig
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177764498
iamdavid (2026-02-01 12:04:50+00:00): Bei highway=footway ist foot=yes unnötig
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177764539
eggie (2026-01-27 14:37:16+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  Let svp wel op dat je niet schuift met de kaart in editmodus. Dat levert vaak schade op.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
TinPetreković (2026-01-28 06:46:11+00:00): The node that was accidentally created has been removed and the split made on it was fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177791137
NeisBot (2026-01-28 07:30:49+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13504233437 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Căn hộ dịch vụ"
---
Ví dụ, một phiên bản trung lập và khách quan hơn của văn bản của bạn có thể là: "Căn hộ dịch vụ"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-05 06:18:38+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178122996
(No visible changes after review)
uprkos (2026-02-03 19:11:20+00:00): Cześć,
Zewnętrznych biblioteczek nie targujemy jako library lecz jako:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dpublic_bookcase
NeisBot (2026-01-28 06:56:34+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/1318223753 v6

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Locksmith shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-05 06:18:40+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178122998
(Cleaned up leftovers from previous edits)
NeisBot (2026-01-28 06:56:37+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13504330100 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "căn hộ"
---
Ví dụ, một phiên bản trung lập và khách quan hơn của văn bản của bạn có thể là: "căn hộ"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-05 06:18:41+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178123000
(No visible changes after review)
peanuthole (2026-05-15 23:47:19+00:00): Acabo de ver esto, pero revertiste el nombre de una tienda de lotería para poner el nombre genérico. Eres libre de dar tu opinión, pero parece que la opinión de la comunidad es que esto es incorrecto :)

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/duda-sobre-el-etiquetado-de-tiendas-de-loteria-estancos-farmacias-y-chinos-paquis/131596
NeisBot (2026-01-28 06:56:39+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/12590103887 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Boat tour facility"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-05 06:18:41+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178123001
(No visible changes after review)
habi (2026-01-27 14:40:53+00:00): Hui, sorry für das grosse Changeset mit `review_requested=yes`, das ist eher unnötig...
eggie (2026-01-27 15:08:00+00:00): Dag rick  Helaas kun je geen routerelaties bewerken met editor iD. De volgorde der relatiedelen gaat dan verloren.
Schakel dan over naar editor JOSM.
editor josm stap voor stap
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/editor-josm-stap-voor-stap/75047

Ik heb de relatie hersteld.

MVG
eggie
James_OWORNTE (2026-03-28 15:34:01+00:00): Thank you for your contribution! The task was well mapped. I simplified some objects that were mapped with too many nodes, using SHIFT+Y in JOSM. Once again, thank you for your participation!
kenVaiphei (2026-03-29 01:12:48+00:00): Thank you James for your comment! Glad to be part of the UN Mappers and OSM communities.
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-27 23:12:24+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13504353740
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1471696461

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-27 23:32:51+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13504353740
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1471696461

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-28 00:12:33+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13504353740
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1471696461

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-28 00:32:15+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13504353740
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1471696461

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
mweper (2026-01-28 01:04:07+00:00): Hola. Por lo que veo aquí, hubo una confusión de etiqueta sort_name con sorting_name y de estas con short_name.

"sorting_name" se usa para detallar el nombre propio de vía, antepuesto a su correspondiente genérico tras coma, para clasificar los nombres o facilitar la búsqueda y localización en listas de topónimos.

"short_name" en cambio, es una versión corta reconocible y de uso común del nombre principal.

En este caso, podrían ser:
short_name=Ricchieri
sorting_name=Ricchieri Pablo, Teniente General
eggie (2026-01-27 15:03:46+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback   Het is niet de bedoeling de routering te manipuleren door de adresnode ergens anders te plaatsen. 
Dat ligt dan aan die router. Ik heb toegangsweg wat uitgebreid. Het zal nu beter routeren.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-01-27 15:10:02+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_car&route=52.166062%2C5.469099%3B52.166726%2C5.468874#map=17/52.166387/5.470172
t_ja (2026-01-27 21:24:52+00:00): Ahoj Tomas,
prosim neupravuj v jednej sade zmien dve rozdielne miesta cez pol republiky. Potom dostanu notifikaciu o zmene aj ti, ktorych sa to vobec netyka, napr. Zahorie, Trnava, Nitra, Piestany... aj ked nevedia realne posudit tvoje zmeny a popravde ich to asi ani nezaujima 😉

T.
Tomas_J (2026-01-27 21:30:02+00:00): Cus, to su asi tie Maproulette priechody s voľbou random. Dam pozor a budem častejšie uploadovat (snáď nezabudnem)
Tomas_J (2026-01-27 21:31:20+00:00): ... poď ešte na Maproulette vyklikat nejaké ďalšie priechody.  Začal si pekne :)
t_ja (2026-01-27 21:44:01+00:00): Ano, slubujem ze sa polepsim a zopar prechodov este zakreslim, ale vcera som kolegovi 3.5hodiny zachranoval data z kolabujuceho SSD disku a dnes po praci bola navsteva Beervany, takze bohuzial OSM slo bokom. Snad zajtra 🤞
felipeeugenio (2026-01-28 11:35:07+00:00): Hola. Es amenity=doctors. Así es el tag. Si dentro hay un doctor o varios es otro tema, pero el tags es en plural.
Por otro lado, por favor cuidar los tildes. Gracias
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177766899
mueschel (2026-01-28 11:50:05+00:00): Hi,
'source:maxbogieweight/maxaxleload' is not a common tag - please don't use special characters like / in keys.

You could either use two tags, 
source_ref:maxbogieweight
source_ref:maxaxleload

or put one source like
source_ref:maxweight - it should be clear that this is supposed to cover all the restriction tags at once.
MarkoŠatrak (2026-01-28 12:46:03+00:00): Hi @mueschel,

I’m writing as the lead of OptimoRoute’s organised editing activity (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities/OptimoRoute).

Thank you for pointing this out. We agree this is not a well formatted tag for OSM. In this case, the source tag was likely not needed at all, since the sign is visible in Bing Streetside imagery in the iD editor. We will review and clean up any similar cases from our recent edits.
mueschel (2026-01-30 09:11:15+00:00): Hi Marko, thanks for taking care. Currently there are still 7 of these tags lefts.
MarkoŠatrak (2026-01-30 10:10:43+00:00): Thanks @mueschel. Everything should be solved now.
liums (2026-01-27 16:49:31+00:00): Erreur dans le compte utilisé avec JOSM, cette modification n'est pas un import de donné automatisé comme le sont les autres changesets de ce compte.
NeisBot (2026-01-28 06:56:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13504406931 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Mary Kay consultora"
---
Por exemplo, uma versão mais neutra e factual do seu texto poderia ser: "Mary Kay consultora"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-05 06:18:41+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178123002
(No visible changes after review)
NeisBot (2026-01-28 06:56:46+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13504405258 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Sťahovacie služby"
---
Napríklad, oveľa neutrálnejšia a faktickejšia verzia tvojho textu by mohla znievať: "Sťahovacie služby"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-05 06:18:42+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178123003
(No visible changes after review)
NeisBot (2026-01-28 06:56:48+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13300458078 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Salon and spa"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-05 06:18:42+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178123004
(No visible changes after review)