piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Patrickov (2023-07-18 03:47:22+00:00): FYI, iD is a poor tool to add routes because it doesn't have function to let you readily sort members or copy existing relations.

That said, let's see if the following can be observed when adding bus routes:
1. Ensure all ways are properly split (i.e. every junction node that matters should have all connecting ways either starting or ending at it);
2. Likewise, the start / end stop position should be start / end of ways accordingly;
3. For every stop, add stops first and then platforms;
4. Add ways from start to end
samho1234567 (2023-07-18 07:35:57+00:00): I am sorry that I cause you trouble. For some reason, I duplicate bus routes applied on the same road for twice. I will see how to fix it.
Patrickov (2023-07-18 07:47:33+00:00): As you may see, I focus on what to do.  I kind of see this as me causing you trouble rather than the other way round, and I have been very careful on my wording.

Duplication is a very minor issue.  In fact, if a bus route does run on a same segment more than once it HAS to be included that many times.  It's not uncommon for a circular route to occupy a segment of road 4 times.
samho1234567 (2023-07-18 08:12:47+00:00): I have fixed the duplication problem. Maybe because of network problem yesterday, the bus route occurs 4 times.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138654218
samho1234567 (2023-07-18 08:14:24+00:00): I used to edit OSM using JOSM, but the limitation of JOSM is that the scope of map is too small. So I switch to iD now.
Patrickov (2023-07-18 09:20:19+00:00): "scope of map is too small" >> what does that mean
samho1234567 (2023-07-18 13:35:19+00:00): JOSM prompts a message "The area you tried to download is too big or your request was too large" when I select to download map of whole Kowloon peninsula. I have to download a small portion of map bit by bit. It is clumsy to edit bus route from New Territories to Hong Kong Island.
Patrickov (2023-07-18 16:06:34+00:00): For bus routes, stops and roads are the most important things.  I usually re-use existing routes to add routes, and only download if absolutely necessary.
Patrickov (2023-07-18 16:11:12+00:00): IMHO iD is practical for features and / or things that need a large size.  Routes, meanwhile, require considerable precision so even if one is created by iD, rectification with jOSM is almost always necessary (KMB 282 was a rare work by me to use iD only).

Two features of jOSM often come handy in rectification:  "Download object" and "Download Parent ways / relations"
Patrickov (2023-07-18 16:25:12+00:00): Sorry, forgot one thing.  By "stops before platforms", I mean "1st stop, 1st platform, 2nd stop, 2nd platform, etc."

You may refer to the wiki:  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Buses
Kovoschiz (2023-07-18 19:15:21+00:00): @samho1234567 You can limit your download: 
A. https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Help/Action/DownloadObject (enable "download relation members" ) 
B.  https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Help/Action/DownloadAlongWay (by selecting single or multiple road segments) 
C. Download incomplete members  https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Help/Dialog/RelationEditor
Kovoschiz (2023-07-18 19:19:19+00:00): You can use https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/continuosDownload for similar experience to iD. I don't use it, only having a hotkey for https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Help/Action/DownloadOsmInView to dl when I need.
eggie (2023-07-18 08:52:51+00:00): Beste.. Dit is wat je hebt gedaan. 
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=138623413
De tag paaltje verwijderd van een node?
Je kun gewoon schuiven met de adresnode over het gebouw.
Ik kan niet beoordelen wat facebook aangeeft. Het gaat erom dat iets in OSM goed staat.
MVG
eggie
mcliquid (2025-01-06 18:06:13+00:00): Hi there, just wanted to ask if this "access=permit" is still valid here?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/558993625

Thank you!
MichthePuk (2025-01-07 07:39:46+00:00): thanks for the feedback! The permissions need to be changed! I'll do it now! 
thanks!
mcliquid (2025-01-07 07:43:15+00:00): You're welcome! Just found out that my router have missed this piece and I wondered why :)
Thanks for checking up
BCNorwich (2023-07-17 18:41:04+00:00): Hi, Welcome.

Just one point, squaring up buildings makes them look neater. Highlight/select the building, right click then click the square icon. All corners are squared up.

Regards Bernard.
eggie (2023-07-17 14:45:53+00:00): Welkom bij OSM

Dit zij  je edits  https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=138623683

Je verplaatste adressen heb ik teruggeplaatst.
De bloemenzaken heb ik samengevoegd met de reeds bestaande adresnodes. Beter niet schuiven met de kaart in editmodus. Dat geeft schade.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-07-17 14:46:56+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
angys (2023-07-17 18:12:18+00:00): can put Jalan Malim Jaya as alt/old name
Percherie (2023-08-06 19:16:20+00:00): Merci pour tes contributions, elles m'ont l'air d'être précise.

Si possible détail un peut plus le nom du changeset.
MaJ Narbonne c'est très vague. Par exemple, MaJ rue centre ville sans préciser plus suffirait largement

Je sais que notre temps libre est limité, aucun problème si tu ne peut pas décrire plus que ça tes modifications. ça reste un conseil et une bonne pratique

Passe un bon été
maraf24 (2023-07-30 11:51:24+00:00): Skąd taka nazwa mostu? Dostępne źródła nie pokazują żadnej nazwy dla tego mostu.
Enock4seth (2023-07-20 07:21:39+00:00): Please kindly update your local map/app to avoid adding duplicates. Both of these are duplicates and not townhalls, but villages. I suppose you were trying to map them as towns.
bxl-forever (2023-07-17 19:56:50+00:00): Hello,

Adding name translations is a nice addition.  But was this change discussed with the community beforehand?

Whether the main name tag should be in Dutch only or Dutch+French has always been a very controversial topic.  (I am personally in favour of bilingual names because they are signposted as such, but several other mappers disagree.)

Out of curiosity, where do the French translations come from?  Your own survey or did you find a map or a list with them?

That being aside, two technical remarks below:

1) In OSM, street names are also repeated on buildings, this is how we group streets and buildings.  If you change street names and ignore the buildings, that will invalidate almost all the addresses in this area.  (Yes, the validator is "dumb" and only compares texts strings.)  Are you planning to update those too?

2) Spelling and grammar rules are important, even when municipalities create street signs with unaccented characters for simplicity, e.g. "Wilde Rozenlaan - Avenue des Eglantines" → Églantines ; "IJsvogellaan - Avenue du Martin Pècheur" → Pêcheur ; "Heldenlaan - Avenue de Héros" → des Héros ; "Kerkbergstraat - Rue Montagne de l'Eglise" → Église, "Ooievaarslaan - Avenue des Cygognes" → Cigognes,…  We’ll have to fix that too.

Have a nice day.
CeceH (2023-07-17 21:40:23+00:00): Hi, 

The current street names were a mix of dutch and bilingual ones. I figured since the commune has official french names for most of our roads (Wezembeek-Oppem being a commune with language facilities), it would be best to make the map more uniform by adding them, similar to neighboring Kraainem. 

I can confirm that the (dutch and french) names are from the official list of the commune since I work for them. 

For the technical remarks, I was unaware that this could have an affect on the buildings and adresses. I will try to double check them. I'll excuse myself for any trouble caused in the meantime. 

I'll also double check the french translations, maybe the list that we use does indeed miss some accents on certain characters.
bxl-forever (2023-07-31 19:24:06+00:00): Thanks for your latest changes, this is a good improvement.  I only found a few minor things to update.  Information is now pretty good here, well done!
eggie (2023-07-17 15:05:43+00:00): Beste wrood.. Zou je het gebied van je edits wat kleiner willen houden.
Controle is dan makkelijker. 
foot=private zetten op wegen heeft weinig zin als dat de enige tag is.  access=private misschien? 

MVG
eggie
JAVIDOV (2023-07-18 20:01:48+00:00): لطفا برای مسیر رسم شده منبع ارائه کنید
osmviborg (2023-07-17 15:01:43+00:00): Flyttet vadestedet en smule, så det passer med Strava- sporet.
antonr (2023-07-17 16:20:35+00:00): Har ikke kigget på strava (kan man det uden konto?), men vadesporet som oprindeligt indtegnet var tydeligt  på (ikke-quick) SDFI luftfotos. Har du fod på hvornår strava-data er fra? Ikke klart for mig hvorfor strava skulle være bedre end SDFI luftfotos... Anyway, ikke vigtigt for mig om sporet følger den ene eller den anden, søbunden ser ret flad ud på luftfotos, så man kan sikkert gå den linje man synes er bedst på dagen.
Xvtn (2023-07-17 17:55:46+00:00): Hi, have you been to this location? These bleachers aren't a building. They just provide seating.
stadiaarcadia (2023-07-18 05:50:11+00:00): Hi, yes there's been a discussion about this on the discussion board. These bleachers are allowed to be part of the stadium building. This way, it's also visible on the map. The tag bleacher and the tag stadium building are both allowed in this case, and the bleachers are allowed to be building. I've read the discussion of the discussion board a while ago, I'll try to find it.
user_5359 (2023-07-18 10:07:33+00:00): Hallo Peter, schaust Du Dir bitte mal meine Korrektur von Deinen Schlüssel "https://www.bistum-trier.de/kultur-musik/veranstaltung/Einweihung-der-Flutkapelle-Donatus-mit-Bischof-Dr.-Stephan-Ackermann-2023.07.15/?instancedate" an?
bxl-forever (2023-07-17 20:11:24+00:00): Hello,

Pardon my asking but what particular sort of issue were you trying to address here?

After your change, any vehicle driving on Zonneboslaan is now prevented to reach Haachtsesteenweg at all because there is a one-way road facing them (this small segment here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1190196610).  Car navigation is now broken here.

As for cyclists, after your changes, a cyclist coming from Zonneboslaan may only turn right towards Brussels and may not reach the eastbound cycle lane (also because of the oneway restriction).

Are you sure this is the intended behaviour?
teaumaz (2023-07-18 08:20:00+00:00): The change I was trying to make is to indicate that people driving on Zonneboslaan are only allowed to turn right onto Haachtsesteenweg, not left. Secondly, people on Haachtsesteenweg coming from direction Brussels and driving towards direction Kampenhout are not allowed to turn left into Zonneboslaan. Basically, what applies to cyclists applies to cars as well.
bxl-forever (2023-07-18 15:37:43+00:00): OK, thanks, I see now.
I understand this is complicated to achieve in the data model and I cannot blame you for not knowing how to solve that properly.  I removed the oneway tags that were essentially barring everyone from using the connection (even legitimate uses) and added a right_turn_only connection here.  Routers will now work as intended.
Have a nice day.
teaumaz (2023-07-18 19:12:12+00:00): Thanks for all the help. Greatly appreciated!
Britzz (2023-07-18 16:40:33+00:00): attention aux éditions sur base uniquement de la BDOrtho, vous avez recréé un passage piéton que je venais tout juste de supprimer : https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3754520
Frédéric Brière (2023-07-20 02:08:34+00:00): Zut, tu m'as "scoopé" d'à peine une heure ou deux là-dessus.  ☺

Dis, est-ce que ton intervention se limitait à la bretelle elle-même?  J'ai cru comprendre que la géométrie de toute l'intersection avait été légèrement modifiée (bien que ça ne paraissait pas tant que ça quand j'y suis allé).  Je pensais y retourner plus tard cette année pour "arpenter" de façon plus précise, mais je vais éviter de pédaler pour rien si tu t'es déjà chargé de la sale besogne.
jfd553 (2023-07-20 14:20:43+00:00): Lol! Je passe par là presque à tous les jours. Ya pas de changement majeur de configuration mis à part l'élimination de la bretelle :-)
smilou (2023-09-16 23:41:51+00:00): Je ne comprends pas cette modification. La vitesse est bien de 55km/h jusqu'à l'extrémité nord du viaduc. J'ignore ce que vous avez compris sur le terrain mais c'est une erreur.
Eric S (2023-09-17 11:34:37+00:00): Je suis passé en montant comme voyageur. J'ai eu l'impression que la limite locale de vitesse s'appliquait à l'ensemble du viaduc. Mais c'était peut-être juste une question de dégagement. Désolé si ce n'est pas le cas.
Eric S (2023-09-17 11:50:43+00:00): En tout cas, je ne sais pas si c'est encore d'actualité, mais à la descente:
https://youtu.be/WC2ao3uVOcg?si=6ZU2UO34oqWIBDWp&t=36
smilou (2023-09-17 16:20:51+00:00): C'est bien toujours la même configuration : 40 annoncé avant le tunnel puis execution après le viaduc dans la descente. Et dans la montée la reprise est bien symétrique, hors dégagement ou signalisation plus restrictive.
Eric S (2023-09-18 18:42:43+00:00): Viaduc remis à 55.
smilou (2023-09-20 09:32:03+00:00): Merci beaucoup ! Et désolé du ton un peu sec, mais j'avais ajusté (presque) toute la ligne il y a 6 mois, ça m'a fait bondir.
rainerU (2023-07-19 19:47:37+00:00): Hallo,

du hast in diesem Changeset den Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/109650919 von surface=paving_stones auf surface=sett gesetzt. Wenn du dir im Wiki die Beschreibung von sett und paving_stones anschaust, wirst du sehen, dass hier eindeutig paving_stones korrekt ist. Bitte korrigiere das.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:surface

Siehe auch: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=252605360095502

Grüße
rainerU
Crewman1987 (2023-07-19 20:21:47+00:00): Hallo, 

danke für deine Anmerkung. Ich habe es geändert. Bin neu was OSM angeht und lerne gerne dazu :)

Grüße
Crewman
user_3716049 (2023-08-24 10:56:57+00:00): Hi tux
habe mir erlaubt Podolskys Döner Bude auf die richtige Position zu verschieben.
Wie auch auf eingen Fotos der RP zu erkennen befindet der sich links von H-Nr. 164.
https://rp-online.de/nrw/staedte/moenchengladbach/podolski-doener-eroeffnung-in-moenchengladbach-mit-schmierereien-in-borussia-farben_aid-93789803
tux67 (2023-08-24 11:20:17+00:00): Klar, danke
yelisey90 (2023-07-17 18:28:56+00:00): so is it optician or electronics shop? Is it Toreli (as in name:en) or Samsung (as in name)?
Magonreal (2023-07-19 07:52:23+00:00): Ich hab die Tags mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138701892 auf highway=living_street geändert, wie es im Wiki Artikel dazu beschrieben ist: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway=living%20street?uselang=de
eggie (2023-07-17 15:46:23+00:00): Commentaar moet zijn merged info with addressnode
NorthCrab_upload (2023-07-17 16:10:15+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1190209080

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2023-07-17 16:10:16+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11051385820

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
habi (2023-07-19 13:50:27+00:00): Ciao BlumenGraben

Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap, schön machst du hier mit.
Ich habe in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138718981 die Daten, die du eingegeben hast, semantisch korrekt geändert, damit alle sog. Datenkonsumenten diese korrekt auslesen können.

E Gruess us Bärn,
habi
Branko Kokanovic (2023-07-19 13:51:09+00:00): Zdravo, samo nastavi da radis, nego htedoh samo da ti kazem da ne menjas ovaj "ref:RS:kucni_broj" tag/oznaku. To se importuje direktno iz drzavnog adresnog registra i upravo sam zavrsio Novi Beograd:) Ako te zanima vise detalja, ovde se dopisujemo oko tog importa: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/uvoz-adresnog-registra-plan/8916 

P.S. svaka pomoc je dobrodosla:D
danieldegroot2 (2023-07-17 16:32:18+00:00): Used Twitter post for reference only;
https://twitter.com/bighappyhead/status/1261242490969100289
felipeeugenio (2023-07-17 19:52:03+00:00): Hola
gracias por sus ediciones.
Salvo casos escándalosos de desplazamiento y de errores en la geometría de los caminos, recomendamos no corregir desplazamientos por imágenes satelitales.
Los proveedores de imágenes son varios y todos tienen desplazamientos y no es posible saber a ciencia cierta cuál es el correcto. Incluso hay diferencias entre capas de un mismo proveedor.

Sucede que usted está hoy cambiando desplazamiento, pero el día de mañana puede llegar otro mapero y corregir todo otra vez y no hay mucho espacio para discutir quién está en lo correcto.

saludos
eggie (2023-07-17 20:06:18+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
user_5359 (2023-07-18 10:10:58+00:00): Welcome to OSM!  Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/11051366987. What is the mean of the tag kunstwegen.org = 21? Is this a internal reference number? Please use the key ref.

Welkom bij OSM!  Kijk eens op http://www.osm.org/node/11051366987. Wat is de betekenis van de tag kunstwegen.org = 21? Is dit een intern referentienummer? Gebruik de key ref.
Tatfahren (2023-07-17 21:13:07+00:00): Hallo Punktepferd,
liege ich richtig das du die Ställe aus einem Gewerbeverzeichnis einträgst?
Diese sind häufig nicht für OSM freigegeben, wodurch die Lizenz verschmutzt wird.

Es erscheint mir schon seit längerem merkwürdig das du so viele Änderungen an Ställen machst, die teilweise sehr weit auseinander liegen.

Vielleicht kannst du das Gewerbeverzeichnis wenn dieses erlaubt ist als Quelle angeben.

Ansonsten würde ich darum bitten genauer aufzupassen um Doppeleinträge unter verschiedenen namen zu vermeiden, da habe nach meiner Erinnerung hin und wieder mal eins gefunden.

Der Standort der Vorgebirgs agrar ist wahrscheinlich ein Überbleibsel von früher, laut dem Luftbild handelt es sich um ehemalige Rinderställe. Der Standort im Teichweg ist korrekt.

Tatfahren.
Punktepferd (2023-07-17 21:27:29+00:00): Die Ställe werden von mir anhand des Impressums deren Websites hinzugefügt. Ein vernünftiges Verzeichnis mit allen Ställen gibt es, meines Wissens leider nicht.

Die Infos zum Gewerbebetrieb habe ich auf dem Bundesanzeiger. Aufrufbar unter: https://www.bundesanzeiger.de/download/futtermittel3/anhang12.pdf Auch ist die Adresse unter verschiedensten Seiten zu finden.
emersonveenstra (2023-07-19 11:06:55+00:00): Hi,

You added a way with no tags here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1190215762

could you please go back and tag it? Thanks!
btwhite92 (2023-07-19 16:14:16+00:00): Hello,
Thanks for the catch - these were tracing guide lines that I forgot to remove. I’ll try to delete them as soon as I can but I’ll be away from my desktop for the next couple days. 
Bradley
silversurfer83 (2023-07-17 19:13:26+00:00): Hi there

this CS is really huge and practically impossible to verify.
According to deepl you removed ATMs of closed banks. Since this CS spans the whole northern hemisphere I feel confident in saying that you can not check for the following case:
The bank is closed but the ATM remains. That's something that happens quite frequently in Germany where small bank branches are closed but the ATM remains. Some mappers, especially new ones, don't tag these things correctly but that's no reason to simply run around deleting everything.

Another thing: Have you talked this edit through on a international mailing list or with the community at community.osm.org?

cheers
silversurfer83
parukhin (2023-07-18 18:26:25+00:00): Hi
In this changeset, in first, i put in order 'operator' tag for ATM in Russia. For one bank we have in OSM DB more 10 variants. For example, "ПАО Сбербанк" - Сбербанк, ОАО Сбербанк, Сбер, Сбербанк России, with " and without, etc.
In second, i  delete ATM after bank bankruptcy. In Russia after bank closing ATM do not work anymore, usually it dismount.
We don't have Independent ATM networks.
silversurfer83 (2023-07-18 18:42:55+00:00): Thank you for clarification.

I would like to point you to this article in the wiki for any future edits of this kind: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct
And also ask you to edit in smaller chunks.

Happy Mapping
Silversurfer83
empty_child (2023-07-17 19:15:11+00:00): Hello georgian110,
Could you, please, say why you deleted ref E692? Is it outdated?
Raenbow (2023-09-05 19:53:21+00:00): Hello there, 

Can we confirm if int_ref E 692 follows the new motorways along https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1121452998 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/763458571? 

Your help and local knowledge would be greatly appreciated to update the ref tagging and ref relation correctly, thank you!
empty_child (2023-09-05 21:13:15+00:00): Hm-m. Technically, you were right. E692 goes from Grigoleti to Samtredia, and not on this part. On this part there are only E70, E97, AH5 and S2. You can check full list here (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Georgia_Abkhazia_South-Ossetia#Categorization)
Raenbow (2023-09-07 22:20:35+00:00): Thank you for your response empty_child. 

From the resource you included, it appears int_ref E 692 should follow the east-west motorway along https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/763458571 and be removed from the secondary highway along https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/120171983, is this correct?
empty_child (2023-09-07 22:30:30+00:00): Yes, that's correct
Raenbow (2023-09-11 20:24:05+00:00): Thank you!
TaraV (2023-07-18 13:51:09+00:00): Hi, I've noticed you are creating new administrative boundaries in this region. Some of these (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16101594, https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16101597 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16101596) are not closed. Are you still working on these? 
Thanks, Tara
Rukkhadevata (2023-07-18 14:08:17+00:00): I have fixed them in the follow-up changesets & thanks for your pointing out.
Cebderby (2023-07-17 19:54:30+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  It is entirely normal for a business or (in this case) amenity that occupies the whole of a building to have the tags on that building outline.  
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dpub
If the application you are using does not handle that, it is a fault of that application not the map.  I have undeleted the building outline you wrongly removed in this changeset; do not delete valid mapping and degrade the map for your own benefit.   (I have left the pub details on your node for now)
OHirschfield (2023-07-17 21:34:09+00:00): Apologies for the destructive change. Although I did consult the wiki before hand it seems that areas marked as pubs do not appear through Overpass which is clearly an issue in itself, hence the changes submitted. I was not aware there could be both the zone and the marker as I assumed it would clash otherwise I would have left it. I went with the marker which provides more support for open data. Now that I know both can be used for the same unique building I can be less destructive fixing any further issues I encounter.
OHirschfield (2023-07-17 21:37:41+00:00): Sorry I have to jump back in as after further review of this change I believe I followed the correct procedure. The building was marked with Ways which the wiki specifically says should NOT be used for amenity pubs. Could you please clarify your standing on this as I believe this is the exact problem and one I did indeed solve?