piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
JRH50 (2024-01-05 13:22:41+00:00):  Someone has already upgraded them to "highway=service." My goal was to declutter the map. Viewing these ferry waiting lanes on imagery, they more resemble a parking aisle than a high speed primary highway.
 The "highway=service" road is a member of the WA525 relation. The WA525 relation has multiple feature types along is course. From south to north the feature types are: "highway=motorway," "highway=primary," "highway=service," "route=ferry," and "highway=primary."
boldtrn (2024-01-09 13:22:15+00:00): Thanks for looking into this. There also was some discussion about this in the OSM community: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/how-to-tag-access-roads-to-public-ferries/107370
Myazyk (2024-02-06 14:13:23+00:00): Ніхто у Східниці цей водоспадик не називає Чотири Копитця.
Не треба брати інфу з Ґугл карт
gscholz (2024-01-26 11:12:00+00:00): Hi Arctic gnome,
as you have created and are more or less constantly editing this time zone relation:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16732433/history

What about fixing the missing roles and keeping the relation intact, as it is currently broken like the "UTC+02:00" relation as well?

Kind regards
Guido
opendcc (2023-11-22 18:29:24+00:00): Hallo und willkommen auf OpenStreetMap. Leider hast Du mit diesem Changeset dem Inn das Wasser ausgelassen, deshalb mußte ich zeitnah die Änderung zurücknehmen. Bei Vergabe von Tags braucht es kein Overtagging - auf einem path gilt implizit hgv=no.

Servus
opendcc (2023-11-22 18:39:14+00:00): Reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144338840
DressyPear4 (2023-11-23 09:44:53+00:00): Atenção ao excluir a tag que identifica a via
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144336936
Udarian (2023-11-27 07:28:31+00:00): first of all, welcome to OSM, as for "Do you have an easier method?" if your talking about iD, it is one of the simpler editors all together, the only simpler ones are for mobile (StreetComplete https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/StreetComplete and Every Door https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Every_Door). from my knowledge iD is the simplest on desktop. There is one last point here, we are legally not allowed to use google as a source since their data is proprietary and we dont have the right to bring it into OSM, especially because OSM is licensed as ODbL and google is proprietary and they haven't given us the express rights to use their data. so from my understanding this commit is in violation of all of that.
Udarian (2023-11-30 05:02:12+00:00): can you please respond as to weather or not the source=google is correct because if it so then action needs to be taken to fix that.
Lindsey Merle (2023-11-30 15:36:19+00:00): They said that Google source for suggestion/evidence is not supported because it is not open information.

I am not sure what is acceptable information
Udarian (2023-11-30 21:20:10+00:00): the imagery layers provided in iD () along with all the other default data sources in iD are ok since they have been checked. as for external data sources see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States/Resources and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Potential_datasources/Local_data#U.S. have more information . As mentioned previously for very simple edits something like StreetComplete and Every Door are best (or GoMap on iOS https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Go_Map!!). if all of that is to complex you can just leave notes with the information (putting in the note all the information that needs to be added like speed limits for example) based on what you see with your own eyes (basic surveying essentially). essentially you can use the above mentioned mobile editors to map what you see with your own two eyes on the street, like a physical speed limit sign or leave a note based on what you see irl.

If am understanding correctly that what your latest comment says that means you used google as a source so this commit must thus be reverted, you dont have to worry about any of that I'll fix that in a second.
Udarian (2023-11-30 21:24:04+00:00): as mentioned in the comments above google data cannot be used so this has to be reverted.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144640780
Anton Melnichuk (2023-11-22 18:02:35+00:00): У вас все гаразд?
Myazyk (2023-11-22 19:26:45+00:00): Так
Frans S (2023-12-21 11:40:11+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Buildings not accurate mapped.
Buildings not squared


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144337668
opendcc (2023-11-22 18:37:40+00:00): CS was reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144339001
Sanniu (2023-11-27 06:29:03+00:00): Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/305185209 and whole Abba Hilel street PSV-only after this changeset. Is this right?
zstadler (2023-11-27 11:03:09+00:00): Thanks for letting me know!
That was a mistake.
Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144503260
Myazyk (2023-11-22 19:27:38+00:00): Шо це за точка за назвою Набережна вулиця?
Anton Melnichuk (2023-11-23 07:30:59+00:00): прибрав, дякую
opendcc (2023-11-22 18:34:54+00:00): Hallo, bitte unterlasse diese Löschungen. Was willst Du erreichen?
user_17222985 (2023-11-28 06:45:34+00:00): російські назви вулиць при перейменуванні зберігати в old name  не потрібно 
російські назви це інформаційне сміття 
українцям російські назви не потрібні вони потрібні лише російським рабам і долбоебам які нехтують що війна і поводяться так наче війни немає 

російська мова це те від чого треба очистити УКраїну 
щоб Україна стала процвітаючою та успішною країною - треба повністю прибрати російську мову з нашої країни
algot (2023-11-28 07:41:41+00:00): Напишіть це в DWG

А перед тим як щось викорінювати було б непогано власною мовою навчитися грамотно писати
thebrad1111 (2023-11-22 18:53:25+00:00): Source: https://bustimes.org/services/54a-chesterfield-clay-cross
Part of this I used local knowledge,  rest is from bustimes (BODS, OGLv3)
dktue (2024-09-05 06:29:39+00:00): Darf man von der unteren Bachstraße von Norden aus kommend wirklich nur nach rechts in die Merkurstraße abbiegen und nicht weiter geradeausfahren?
thumnus (2023-12-14 16:54:41+00:00): Is this construction still ongoing?
Berlin53 (2023-12-14 17:57:15+00:00): Construction work until 2027.
s8evq (2023-11-23 08:16:09+00:00): Dag StijnRR,

Waarom wijzig je terug de surface tag van concrete:plates naar concrete? Concrete:plates lijkt me toch correcter op bijvoorbeeld Oud Leykenstraat?
StijnRR (2023-11-26 18:16:56+00:00): Concrete:plates is voor "heavy-duty plates", NIET voor eender welke betonplaten.
Jordi MF (2023-11-22 19:37:56+00:00): Por favor,
No añadas información no relevante que parecen notas personales. ¿Qué querías añadir con "Denis"?
Matt_ (2023-11-22 19:49:17+00:00): Please see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/US_National_Inventory_of_Dams
mcliquid (2023-11-23 08:24:55+00:00): Hi,

just a general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
s-guitton (2023-11-22 20:04:24+00:00): This should be a relation, not a way, right?
MxxCon (2023-11-23 06:36:25+00:00): Should "red trail" be capitalized?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144341391
DaveF (2023-11-25 19:47:17+00:00): Please revert this changeset.
You've misunderstood.
See my comment in the thread on Tal-GB.
OrangeHurst97 (2023-11-25 20:11:56+00:00): I'm not so sure about that. Everything I have read indicates a complete rebrand, not just the governing bodies. As your correspondence with the Cotswolds was two years ago (before all other areas took the National Landscape name), could it be that this has since changed?
DaveF (2023-11-25 20:25:06+00:00): Could you post a link that shows how it's changed?
OrangeHurst97 (2023-11-25 20:28:18+00:00): First one here indicates that the National Landscape is a place, not an organisation. https://highweald.org/news/introducing-the-high-weald-national-landscape/
OrangeHurst97 (2023-11-25 20:47:04+00:00): Quote from the webpage: "The area will be High Weald National Landscape. Our designation is still High Weald Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty."
DaveF (2023-11-25 20:57:23+00:00): I've emailed Cots wolds to ask for confirmation.
OrangeHurst97 (2024-06-29 20:20:40+00:00): As this edit hasn't been reverted and other AONBs/NLs have also been changed, do I assume that the name change for the Cotswolds was correct?
mcliquid (2023-11-23 08:23:21+00:00): Hi, da du einen Review angefordert hast, gehe ich kurz darauf ein. Mit "traffic_sign" gibt man normalerweise nur an, auf welcher Basis ein bestimmtes Tagging durchgeführt wurde - also beispielsweise warum ein Radweg als Radweg eingetragen wurde.
Um das Stoppschild für das Routing als "Zeitstrafe" gültig zu machen, braucht es ein "highway" als Key - also highway=stop. Optional könnte man einen Punkt mit "traffic_sign=stop" neben der Straße dort platzieren wo das Schild wirklich steht, aber das würde niemand auswerten.

Die Richtung gibt man auf einem Weg idealerweise nur mit "direction=forward/backward" an, da sich dies am einfachsten auslesen lässt. Eine Gradzahl wird momentan nicht ausgewertet.

Das finale (aus meiner Sicht korrekte) Tagging wäre damit: direction=backward + highway=stop
Wordverbot (2023-11-23 10:12:45+00:00): Hallo danke für das ausführliche Feedback jetzt ist es mir klarer
Colemagoo (2023-12-14 01:32:30+00:00): I don't think these cycleways should be mapped seperately (until the new Cameron Rd protected lanes start.

Cycle lanes that are just painted on the road can just be dealt with cycleway=lane on the main roadway (which should already be there.)

Mapping them seperately implies that they're significantly different from the main roadway in a way that isn't true (at least on Chapel St)
Nachtspazz (2023-11-22 21:57:39+00:00): Sehr gut. Jetzt ist es sogar schöner als zuvor ;-).
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2023-11-23 14:33:25+00:00): Please keep service roads there. OpenStreetMap is very clear on that: map what is there, even if private or customers-only. Then add the correct access tags: access=private or access=customers

Are you the owner of this business?

Please read this wiki page for more info (even if this page talks about trails and tracks, it is even more true for service roads): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2023-11-23 14:34:15+00:00): Routing engines will not route cars there when the correct access tag is set (access=private or access=customers)
osmoj (2023-11-22 21:12:26+00:00): The older node (8yrs old) is preserved in order to keep its (longer) history in favor of the newer node (1y old).
osmoj (2023-11-22 22:22:23+00:00): Also the newer node should instead have been an update to the older node in the first place.
225059 (2023-11-22 21:16:29+00:00): Der Briefkasten „Nogenter Platz/Elisabethstr.“ ist nicht mehr vorhanden. Vermutlich wurde er wegen der Rathaussanierung entfernt.
Da er in der Briefkastensuche der Deutschen Post nicht mehr gelistet wird (auch nicht als temporär außer Betrieb) habe ich ihn gelöscht. Werde es beobachten, ob da irgendwann mal wieder einer aufgestellt wird.
welzheimerwald (2023-11-25 18:22:29+00:00): Wieso wurde hier bei ca. 48.84105,9.56085 eine trapezförmige Lücke zwischen Wald und Wiese reingefräst?
welzheimerwald (2023-11-25 19:11:12+00:00): Auch, dass man geschotterte Waldwege aus landuse=forest ausstanzt (zb. hier: 48.83743,9.58839), habe ich so noch nie gesehen. Was hat es damit auf sich? Wieso wir ein zusammenhängendes Waldgebiet derartig zerschnitten?
Mammi71 (2023-12-01 17:49:05+00:00): Die trapezförmige Lücke ist vermutlich durch einen Fehler bei der Bearbeitung entstanden. Habe sie wieder geschlossen.
limes11 (2023-11-22 21:48:20+00:00): Hi, 

Du hast hier zuviel gelöscht. Es war sicher nur die Querverbindung gemeint.

Zudem besser solche im Luftbild exzellent erkennbare Wege nicht einfach rauszulöschen. Für sowas gibt es lifecycle-Präfixe. abandoned:highway und so.

Viele Grüße

Limes
nilix (2023-11-22 22:00:53+00:00): Da hast du vielleicht recht. Mal sehen ob sich der neue Mapper meldet. Trotzdem kann ich mir vorstellen, dass dieser Abschnitt renaturiert wird.
limes11 (2023-11-22 22:09:38+00:00): Er hatte geschrieben "von Kreuzung zu Kreuzung" - Wenn da eines Tages mehr renaturiert wird, kann man das nachtragen.
BubbaJuice (2023-11-22 21:21:20+00:00): and fences I think
Ich124 (2023-11-22 21:24:47+00:00): benötigt weitere Änderungen, da alle Linien, die den Busbahnhof nun anfahren, ihren Plan auch am 06.11.2023 geändert haben z.B. die Buslinie 710 https://www.vtf-online.de/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2023/pdf2023_08/710_20231106.pdf
osmoj (2023-11-22 21:55:26+00:00): Updated this node with the recently added data of node/10154492751 (contributed by [1]) which was reverted and merged into this node.
The update changed the node's location, housenumber, name, operator, opening_hours and contact:* scheme.

See also the comments in changeset/144306289 for the reason.

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Physiotherapie%20Nicole%20Berndt
osmoj (2023-11-22 21:56:10+00:00): Also added off-times to opening_hours and wheelchair=no.
osmoj (2023-11-23 23:01:01+00:00): Resolves note #3937981
MxxCon (2023-11-23 06:41:22+00:00): Hello.
Please split your edits grouped by smaller geographic areas, such as one neighborhood or one city at most at a time. There's no reason for this changeset to span from NJ to NY like this.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144344387
PedroMTG13 (2023-11-22 22:54:58+00:00): Hi tjnakano,

Can you confirm that this power station is still active?

Thanks
Glassman (2023-11-23 19:45:00+00:00): I'm not sure those are really traffic calming islands. I did make them smaller to the size of the actual islands and removed the nodes connected to the roundabout. Try to avoid connecting features that are never connected. It saves time when you want to update a feature.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144344929
MxxCon (2023-11-23 06:42:28+00:00): Hello.
What are you trying to indicate here by adding 2-3 year old check_date tags?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144345155
CjMalone (2023-11-23 09:44:36+00:00): That they are suspect. I couldn't find them on https://locations.99only.com/
MxxCon (2023-11-23 18:41:36+00:00): n2561534359 seems to be "New Fu Xing Market II Corp", looks like some discount-ish housewares store, but def not "99only" brand.

n2887579209 is "Sam's Discount 99c & Up". Also not "99only" brand.
CjMalone (2023-11-23 20:52:21+00:00): Nice, if you have a valid source for that, make the edit. Thank you.

The date I added to them was the OSM last edited, with some kind of local knowledge (not blind tag changes from iD, not building changes from aerial imagery). That can sometimes be hard to tell from the object history.

The idea is that OSM consumers and editors can be aware that the data is old. StreetComplete is a great example, it will ask the user to confirm it's still there/what has replaced it.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-11-22 22:50:29+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9276764961

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-31 15:33:12+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11369676462/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop?
Sparks (2025-03-31 15:47:39+00:00): I believe this is a fast food restaurant named Urban Wok.  I updated the node to include that it is fast food and added the name.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-31 16:13:29+00:00): Thanks for quick reaction! I will also remove fixme:type
Sparks (2025-03-31 17:34:23+00:00): Opps, thought I had removed that.  Thanks for cleaning that up.
gscholz (2023-11-24 07:42:32+00:00): Hi Santanaloba53,
your recent changesets have created a huge amount of errors in the OSM database regarding duplicate nodes
and building shapes which are be far too large:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-71.74433&lat=18.03692&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=144346156

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
KasperSFranz (2023-11-24 05:57:06+00:00): Hi
Thank you for updating these addresses, it might be worth reading https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses_in_the_United_Kingdom#Tags_to_avoid

There are som tags in general to avoid in the UK as they can be automatically determined from the admin boundaries.
zorque (2023-11-24 13:36:50+00:00): Hi,
thanks for the heads-up. I came across that page yesterday. I've stopped adding addr:country yesterday afternoon. The Josm address preset makes it look like a desirable tag. (labelled optional though).
re addr:county, this was to 'preserve' what was incorrectly included in addr:city. I agree that this is somewhat redundant and had not planned to use it anymore going forward.
zorglubu (2023-11-26 09:31:49+00:00): Hello,

just a general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

- combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
- keep changes within the same country
- upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section "Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
opendcc (2023-11-23 04:42:25+00:00): Hallo,
OSM bildet das ab, was auf der Erde zu finden ist. Deshalb: bitte vergib keine Phantasienamen. Das gilt auch für den 'GruberPark'.
steinm (2023-11-23 17:57:03+00:00): Sind die Wege auf dem Parkplatz for der Stadthalle wirklich Einbahnstraßen? Beschildert ist das nicht. Nur die umlaufende Straße ist tatsächlich ein beschilderte Einbahnstr.
vwwatcher (2023-11-27 19:41:51+00:00): Die Schilder wurden vor Jahren bei Pflegearbeiten entfernt. Die Parkplätze sind jedoch immer noch Richtungsgebunden (45 Grad angewinkelt) angelegt und ein entgegengesetztes Einfahren macht keinen Sinn
steinm (2023-11-28 09:14:01+00:00): Das sind für das Mapping in OSM aber keine Argumente. Entscheidend ist die Beschilderung. Für jemanden ohne historische Ortskenntnis ist das offentsichtlich ein Fehler in der Karte. Ich persönlich würde sogar eher rückwärts einparken wollen, müsste also gegen die vermeindliche Einbahnstr. fahren.
wwwFrank (2023-11-28 11:04:40+00:00): Wenn die Schilder entfernt wurden, dann ist es nun keine Einbahnstraße mehr.
MFlamm (2024-05-03 10:36:29+00:00): Attention: seul le tout dernier tronçon de la Rue de Bernex est en sens unique pour les voitures. J'ai remis la rue en bidirectionnel jusqu'aux derniers accès riverains.
J'ai remarqué que les suggestions de improveosm.org concernant des probables sens uniques sont souvent fausses, donc il faut les analyser très précisément car sinon le routage d'itinéraires sera bloqué dans un sens (et cela peut considérablement dégrader les calculs d'itinéraires cyclistes).
grzegorz75jan (2026-07-17 18:57:01+00:00): W tej edycji (innych nie sprawdzałem) dodawałeś adresy ale nie pełne. W tym przypadku jako że miejscowość nie ma nazw ulic to brakuje addr:place=* np. w tym przypadku
grzegorz75jan (2026-07-17 18:59:52+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1226049845#map=19/50.022017/20.539223&layers=N
CurlingMan13 (2023-11-25 07:14:55+00:00): Overlapping areas is not permitted.  Please review to avoid common mapping pitfalls:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#:~:text=Overlapping%20green/fairway/rough%20polygons%20(see%20graphic%20below).

I have updated this for you.
chinook17 (2024-05-20 01:52:34+00:00): Bonjour, est-ce que les vélos sont vraiment interdits sur le viaduc Van Horne / Rosemont?
Matt_ (2023-11-23 02:59:06+00:00): Please see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/US_National_Inventory_of_Dams
eggie (2023-11-23 09:24:32+00:00): Hoi Dalfsenaartje..
Dat inner is oke, maar er is geen outer dus ook geen effect.
Het water hoort de outer te zijn.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-11-23 10:13:44+00:00): Ik heb een nieuw mp aangemaakt..
Het zal straks wel renderen. 
gr eggie
Dalfsenaartje (2023-11-23 17:50:05+00:00): Top!
iandees (2023-11-24 16:27:49+00:00): Please be more careful when drawing the buildings. They should match the footprint of the building and be much more precise than this.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144350257
allen4names (2023-11-23 12:08:53+00:00): Thank you.
Ropino (2024-02-18 15:08:50+00:00): siehe CS
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144350757
Ropino (2024-02-18 15:08:46+00:00): Hallo,
Wann hast du die Gleise auf dem Parkplatz den lokal gesehen?
Das was du als Gleise mit "Lokales Wissen" erfasst hast, sind lediglich farblich unterschiedliche Pflastersteine die das ehemalige Gleis andeuten sollen. Dort sind seit vielen Jahrzehnten keine Gleise mehr im Boden.
Es existiert nur winziges Gleisstück unterhalb des alten Straßenbahntriebwagen 811 der dort steht. Dieses Stück war bereits in OSM vorhanden.
Ich werde die beiden CS reverten, weil es mit der Situation vor Ort schlicht nichts zu tun hat.
Der "operator=Ruhrbahn" war auch falsch. Ende der 1960er Jahre gab es in Mülheim keine "Ruhrbahn".
Woher auch immer deine Erkenntnisse stammen, die Quelle "Lokales Wissen" zweifle ich stark an.
Btw:
Seit wann haben Gleise den Namen, insbesondere so was wie "Historische Straßenbahn" ?
VG
Supaplex (2023-11-23 08:21:41+00:00): usually use ';' for seperate different addr:housenumber on the same object
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144351110
Настаев Василий Геннадьевич (2023-12-05 04:51:49+00:00): Добрый день!Как узнать координаты внесенных дорог?
bjoern262 (2024-01-01 18:13:18+00:00): Hallo. Worauf beziehst du diese Änderung?

railway= sind reine Infrastruktur-Tags, unabhängig davon wie sie bedient werden. Sie beschreiben ausschließlich Eigenschaften des Gleises selbst. Die Straßenbahn am Golzheimer Platz im Straßenraum ist sicherlich keine unabhängige "subway". Ob da nun eine Linie drüber führt die mit einem "U" beginnt oder nicht ist dem Gleis selber erstmal völlig egal.

Streng genommen war teilweise schon "light_rail" nicht ganz korrekt für straßenbündige Führung. Aber "subway" passt halt wirklich überhaupt nicht.
aceman444 (2025-05-18 15:22:35+00:00): Z-Box podla Ortofoto? To asi tazko
Prestante uz klamat o svojich zdrojoch.

A tie kose asi nebudu za plotom.
ooosssay (2023-11-23 05:29:44+00:00): No not added deleted
krchow (2023-11-23 06:24:49+00:00): Drew in a minor road that crosses this grid. Didn't see any further buildings to draw.