piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
archie (2025-02-20 19:22:20+00:00): jag vet inte hur ofta du vill tagga den här vägen (motorroad=yes) med foot=no. Du har gjort det åtskilliga gånger nu. 
vägar som är taggade enl ovan är by default foot=no. Detta är en egenskap av vägen. Därför är det absolut onödigt att göra den här editeringen som jag har reverterat.
archie (2025-02-20 19:30:05+00:00): De här vägsträckorna har du nu taggat fem (5) gånger på det här helt onödiga sätt. Hur många gånger tänker du fortsätta med detta? Det här är inte ok! 
Det är ungefär som om du taggar en vanlig bilväg med motor_vehicle=yes.
HugoJohansson (2025-02-20 21:13:22+00:00): Resultatet är att företag (streetferret.com)  som använder OSM för att exempelvis visa var man kan gå, får med denna sträcka. Ett alternativ är att sätta den som ”expressway”. Skulle det vara mer korrekt?

Det blir svårt för deras algoritm när olika vägar har lite olika utseende i olika delar av världen. Foot=no är annars en tydlig info även om den må vara en upprepning.
archie (2025-02-20 21:25:03+00:00): En grundläggande princip när du editerar i osm "don't edit/tag for the renderer". Du skall inte anpassa taggningen i osm så att det passar någon applikation. Detta gäller även för dig.
archie (2025-02-20 21:28:47+00:00): Foot=no endast när det finns skyltat förbud. Inte när din app vill det. Det är grundläggande här i osm. Sluta upp med detta!
HugoJohansson (2025-02-23 17:59:03+00:00): Men nu står det foot=yes på en väg som är skyltad med förbud mot gående
archie (2025-02-23 18:08:49+00:00): jaså, vilken väg då?
HugoJohansson (2025-02-23 19:36:22+00:00): Dessa är skyltade med motorvägled vilket är förbjudet för gående (men har Foot=yes)
303205834
303205835
25794568
24960906
archie (2025-02-23 19:45:18+00:00): Är du go' eller? Inte någon av dessa vägar är taggade med foot=yes.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-02-20 19:21:35+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4311175256
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1361510932

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eggie (2025-02-20 19:51:23+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback   Dit is niet helemaal goed gegaan. Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=162755010

Wat was je bedoeling ?

warnings:crossing_ways:building-highway
  	2


  warnings:crossing_ways:highway-highway
  	2
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-02-20 19:54:30+00:00): Je hebt wat wegen over elkaar gelegd en een adresnode van de woning gehaald. Met welk doel?

Ik draai deze changeset even terug.
Graag reactie ... dan kunnen we evt hulp bieden.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-02-20 19:55:53+00:00): reverted by changeset #162755372
eggie (2025-02-20 19:59:46+00:00): Bij nr 11 heb ik een oprijlaan ingetekend. Dat zal helpen het adres te vinden.
gr eggie
rskedgell (2025-02-20 21:21:00+00:00): Thanks for adding this. I suspect that the privately owned service roads within Glengall Business Centre should be tagged with access=destination + ownership=private. That should prevent routing software from using it as a short cut between Old Kent Road/Ossory Road and Glengall Road. Assuming you're more familiar with the area than me, does that sound like a reasonable description of access there?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Ddestination
Benjamin Jefferys (2025-02-20 22:02:31+00:00): It sounds totally reasonable, it really does look like a private road to me. I don't know if there are gates on the other side preventing access there, but I'd assume so. In any case, the gate that's there means it isn't a usable thoroughfare. Thanks!
rskedgell (2025-02-21 13:59:49+00:00): Thanks. Looking at the Bing aerial and street side imagery, the 5 mph limit and informal zebra crossings indicate that it's not a public highway. Despite this, it still appears to be officially called Ossory Road from its Designated Street Name USRN. I've updated it and tweaked a few other things nearby in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162781378

It may take a couple of weeks before cycle routing software "knows" about either of our edits, depending on how often they update.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-05 12:13:33+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2754146794/history has shop = agricultural_machinery that was added in this edit
Maybe shop=agrarian agrarian=agricultural_machinery would be better tagging? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=agrarian

Or maybe this shop value should be documented at OSM Wiki?
the-wouter (2025-12-07 15:54:05+00:00): Sure, makes sense. Feel free to change the tagging 🙂
dknelson9876 (2025-02-22 17:32:27+00:00): Hi Deet64, are you aware that changeset comments are public information? Are you okay with this personal information being available?
Deet64 (2025-02-22 18:54:20+00:00): NNNNNNnnnope. didn't think about it in the sense that it'd be super viewable/easily seen. i have just spent some time researching more on it. seems editing the changeset comment is next to impossible. thanks for pointing this one out, i should exercise more internet safety..
dknelson9876 (2025-02-22 19:00:05+00:00): If you would like it redacted, you can make a request to the Data Working Group (DWG) at data@openstreetmap.org and they'll take care of it
Hufkratzer (2025-02-21 20:14:16+00:00): Hi,
I doubt that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1361529906 is a horseback riding center. This area is too small. If it is a small riding arena it should be tagged leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian. But perhaps it is only a paddock or something else.
Examples fpr horseback riding centers:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/467658081/history#map=15/40.54968/-111.94362&layers=P
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/568052124#map=17/37.397701/-122.246144&layers=P
See also:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map
Deet64 (2025-02-21 20:30:51+00:00): Ah, that's embarrassing, thank you. I was typing in any horse or equestrian thing I could think of with a note to look again when I got off work tonight. 
They teach horse back riding in their circle for beginners, I guess I was just unsure what to tag it as but leisure=pitch should be ok I think.
Hufkratzer (2025-02-21 20:58:06+00:00): An equestrian center with 2 round pens:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1140666501#map=18/37.085015/-122.005017&layers=P
eggie (2025-02-20 20:22:36+00:00): Dag Erik.. Tja   Je zou eens een berichtje naar de Gemeente kunnen sturen over die gevaarlijk situatie. 
Formeel mag je er natuurlijk wel lopen, maar het is niet aan te raden.
MVG
eggie
Erik de Grunn (2025-02-21 15:22:34+00:00): Hoi Eggie,
Ik heb het gemeld bij de gemeente. Dat ging best makkelijk. Nu afwachten of ze er iets mee doen. 
Erik
eggie (2025-02-21 15:49:27+00:00): 👍
Fizzie-DWG (2025-02-21 04:47:40+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17293
𝚗𝚘𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚟𝚎𝚗 (2025-02-23 06:58:54+00:00): У меня друг ездил недавно в той местности, я попросил проехаться и сделать фото, раньше  использовал Яндекс карты только в одном месте, но после того, как мне сделали замечание, я перестал их использовать
Fizzie-DWG (2025-02-23 07:37:37+00:00): Спасибо! Когда вы это сделаете, пожалуйста, укажите ваш источник как "опрос", чтобы все знали, как вы получили информацию!

Thank you! When you do that, please list your source as "survey" so everybody knows how you've got the information!
𝚗𝚘𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚟𝚎𝚗 (2025-02-23 08:00:52+00:00): Источник - мой друг
𝚗𝚘𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚟𝚎𝚗 (2025-02-23 16:51:27+00:00): Все ограничения и претензии с меня сняты?
jtracey (2025-02-20 20:34:59+00:00): Resolves https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4632554
jtracey (2025-02-21 02:48:01+00:00): Should be "fee=yes" + "charge=3.25 CAD", at least according to the wiki.

Thanks for all the edits btw, awesome stuff.
galen8183 (2025-02-21 03:55:49+00:00): Ah of course, thanks!
galen8183 (2025-02-21 04:30:19+00:00): should be all fixed in https://osm.org/changeset/162764192 along with some other inconsistent tags
⇄ john paul jones & gringo (2025-07-09 08:41:41+00:00): Do you not read the attached notes? 
Quote "This post box would appear to have the wrong collection plate inserted. From my research this box should be ref. DN34 242 and not DN34 113D as it currently is, which is duplicated at Laceby Road/Nuns Corner. https://i.postimg.cc/3NDNmfrL/DN34-113-D-3.jpg"
eastender (2025-07-09 11:00:35+00:00): Yes, I read the note at the time. In fact, I referenced the note in the fixme. The purpose of the fixme was to request that the box was resurveyed, in the hope of a new collection plate with the correct ref being installed in the future.
⇄ john paul jones & gringo (2025-07-10 08:40:41+00:00): Fair enough, I have revisited the site several times. A new plate has now been inserted and I've updated the node on OSM.
jtracey (2025-02-20 20:59:35+00:00): Resolves https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4582010
eggie (2025-02-20 21:51:11+00:00): Dag nieuwlaurens Je voetpad loopt dwars door de bebouwing. Waarom?
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=162757504
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-02-20 21:57:49+00:00): pad uit bebouwing gehaald
warnings:crossing_ways:building-highway
nieuwlaurens (2025-02-20 22:06:28+00:00): foutje, niet goed gezien in de satelliet..
eggie (2025-02-20 22:15:22+00:00): Het is ook lastig. 
Het is steeds weer checken wat je hebt gedaan en dan fijn slijpen.
Pak ook niet te veel aan in één keer. 

Mapse
eggie
eggie (2025-02-20 21:54:20+00:00): Beste laurens  Je plakt de voetpaden aan een vlak bos.. Beter paden loshouden van landuse

MVG
eggie
pitfire (2025-02-25 11:42:13+00:00): Hallo Nisyz,

bitte berücksichtige, dass weder die Waldwege noch die Zufahrtsstraße zum "hamlet-Roth" Straßennamen bekommen. Hier gibt es lediglich ein "Zeichen 419-10
Pfeilwegweiser " an der Abzweigung von der K 55.

MfG pitfire
eggie (2025-02-20 22:17:46+00:00): Hier bv heeft je pad nerghens een verbinding mee. Ik heb het zo aangepast dat het routeert met de omliggende wegen.
Jouw  edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=162757622

en mijn edits
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=162758891
ilpauzner (2025-02-21 09:57:12+00:00): The name of the relation is "Israeli controlled Lebanese land", however it included parts of Israel south of the international border which are not "Lebanese land" in any reasonable way. Therefore, I set the international border (as drawn on OSM) as their southern boundary.
yrtimiD (2025-02-22 23:24:10+00:00): Hi, right, I see this now, my bad. Sorry for too fast judging (political vandalism is too common recently in these areas).
I restored your edits.
Just as recommendation, it is always better to give detailed explanation for such sensitive edits.
My apologies again.
ilpauzner (2025-02-25 13:07:55+00:00): No problem at all! Thanks for the suggestion, next time I'll do better.
bartgron (2025-02-20 21:31:20+00:00): Miał być opis o dodanych latarniach z ortofotomapy :)
s777n (2025-02-21 11:43:00+00:00): Чтобы добавить объект  недостаточно добавить точку с именем нужно еще проставить нужные теги. Добавил shop=tattoo. Исправлено
DaveF (2025-02-22 23:57:42+00:00): What does " Doagh" mean?
NeisBot (2025-02-21 05:01:05+00:00): Hello, thank you for your contribution.

I noticed that some of the tags and descriptions you've used appear to be related to #SEO #spam. I recommend reading the following page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Spam

Could you please confirm if your map edits here were intentional?

#MapWithoutSpam #TagSmartNotSpam
NeisRevert (2025-03-13 10:04:53+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/162759427
https://osm.org/changeset/163540652
aboc (2025-02-20 22:06:14+00:00): bbox largo: ho accidentalmente aggiunto un punto il punto a nord est mentre copiavo un tag da una altra diga
aboc (2025-02-20 22:06:38+00:00): *nord-ovest
Jrachi (2025-02-21 08:01:44+00:00): Ciao.
Hai lasciato un buco nella relazione tra i nodi:
12605316123 e 12605316124
Solitamente quando trovo delle vacanze correggibili senza dubbi, le correggo, ma oggi mi astengo, visto che devi imparare ad usare iD (che è l'editor meno adatto a modificare le relazioni)
Ivo
Ivo
NeisBot (2025-02-21 05:01:06+00:00): Hello, thank you for your contribution.

I noticed that some of the tags and descriptions you've used appear to be related to #SEO #spam. I recommend reading the following page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Spam

Could you please confirm if your map edits here were intentional?

#MapWithoutSpam #TagSmartNotSpam
NeisRevert (2025-03-13 10:03:40+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/162759427
maro21 (2025-02-22 18:44:43+00:00): Od 2018 roku wiele się tu zmieniło. Mapuj proszę z najnowszych zdjęć
Krzemyczek (2025-02-22 22:00:14+00:00): oh. Ugh, myślałem, że im wyżej są zdjęcia satelitarne, tym nowsze są. Będę pamiętać.
maro21 (2025-02-24 22:17:15+00:00): Nie, pozycja zdjęć na liście nie ma znaczenia. Są one posortowane alfabetycznie. Na górze są zdjęcia oznaczone gwiazdką, co oznacza, że to są dobre podkłady z których można mapować. Czemu Orto 2018 Wrocławia powędrowało na pierwszą pozycję po aktualizacji iD do nowej wersji to nie wiem. W każdym razie u mnie po włączeniu edytora iD automatycznie wybrane jest "Geoportal 2: Ortofotomapa (najnowsze zdjęcia lotnicze) (WMTS)".

* Geoportal 2: Ortofotomapa (najnowsze zdjęcia lotnicze) (WMTS) oraz też te cztery na samym dole to zdjęcia z marca-maja 2024, dokładnej daty nie znam.
* Wrocław: Ortofotomapa 2018 (zdjęcia lotnicze) są z kwietnia 2018, ale są to cenne zdjęcia bo zrobione przed kwitnieniem liści na drzewach, przez co drzewa nie zasłaniają niektórych obiektów, więc się w tych przypadkach przydają
* Bing jest też marca-maja 2024, ale zdjęcia są około dwa tygodnie nowsze niż Geoportal. Ale Binga trzeba skalibrować przed każdym włączeniem edytora.
𒂼𒄄　 (2025-02-22 05:42:39+00:00): رجاءا استخدم وصف لتعديلك تصف فيه ماذا قمت بالتعديل، حيث ان
"new name" 
لايقل لنا ماذا قمت بتعديل ولايعطينا فكرة عما فعلت. الرجاء وصف تعديلاتك بما تفعل.
5m4u9 (2025-02-21 16:12:42+00:00): Hola, 

está bueno que añadas los edificios, pero tienes que rectangulizarlos, seleccionas el edificio y presionas la tecla Q en el editor.

No rectangulizar es dejar a medias algo que se podría tener en un principio, y para quienes ven el mapa, ven algo improvisado.

ojala puedas arreglar...
LuckyNumberS7evin (2025-03-13 10:09:48+00:00): 👍 Thank you
LuckyNumberS7evin (2025-03-13 10:10:21+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/162759427
NeisBot (2025-02-21 05:01:07+00:00): Hello, thank you for your contribution.

I noticed that some of the tags and descriptions you've used appear to be related to #SEO #spam. I recommend reading the following page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Spam

Could you please confirm if your map edits here were intentional?

#MapWithoutSpam #TagSmartNotSpam
LuckyNumberS7evin (2025-03-13 10:09:32+00:00): 👍 Thank you
NorthCrab_upload (2025-02-20 23:01:18+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12605385884

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NeisBot (2025-02-21 08:06:02+00:00): Hi rewqty, thank you for your contribution to the OSM project.

Over your latest stretch of time, you've made at least 45 changesets with minimal or no meaningful comments.

To enhance collaboration, please consider using the comment field to describe your map changes. This helps others understand and follow your adjustments more easily. You can find guidance on good changeset comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 

Thanks!

PS: I've also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
Marek-M (2025-02-21 07:15:35+00:00): Cześć, poprawiłem zjazd na A1, który edytowałeś. Większość tego zjazdu powinna być narysowana jedną linią, bo nie ma tam podziału fizycznego. Zjazdy z drogi powinny być tworzone przy wysepce rozdzielającej ruch a nie na początku pasa do skrętu. Ten zjazd był bardzo nieprawidłowo narysowany - https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1361559217

Wizualizacja mojej poprawki: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=162767081
Tomas09 (2025-02-21 15:15:36+00:00): levels*
mcliquid (2025-02-21 19:59:38+00:00): Würdest du die Linie nicht drin lassen, damit andere die nicht unwissend aus dem Luftbild wieder abmalen?
ChrisFromRV (2025-02-21 20:02:49+00:00): Sorry, habe aber keine Brücke auf dem Luftbild gesehen.
mcliquid (2025-02-21 20:07:30+00:00): Anbei das aktuelle Mapbox Satellite Bild: https://ibb.co/PsRk1h5n

Eine Brücke gab es an der Stelle nie. Die Rengoldshauser Straße wurde "zugeschüttet" und ist nach wie vor nicht befahrbar.
ChrisFromRV (2025-02-21 20:58:37+00:00): OK, versuche es zu korrigieren.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-02-21 01:39:23+00:00): Hello & welcome to OSM! Thanks for your work, but one thing to mention. When you've finished mapping a building, please hit your "Q" key, which will straighten the walls and square it up, rather than leaving it crooked! Thanks!
𒂼𒄄　 (2025-02-22 05:41:41+00:00): رجاءا استخدم وصف لتعديلك تصف فيه ماذا قمت بالتعديل، حيث ان
"new name" 
لايقل لنا ماذا قمت بتعديل ولايعطينا فكرة عما فعلت. الرجاء وصف تعديلاتك بما تفعل.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-02-21 00:10:47+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9276746768

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
stasiu512 (2025-10-27 20:21:15+00:00): Cześć, jaki jest powód obniżenia klasy odcinka ul. Bema? Tamtędy leci cały ruch z północnych dzielnic w strone Siedlec/Kartuskiej.
theDM (2025-10-27 23:06:10+00:00): Cześć, tam ruch jest znacznie niższy niż na Dąbrowskiego czy Powstańców Warszawskich.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-17 00:49:38+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165050253
fswat (2026-03-24 13:12:21+00:00): What is the source of the created objects? If it's a dive site, it hasn't been tagged correctly
WoSoe (2025-02-21 04:31:26+00:00): Moin!
Du hast in/um Apfeldorf eine viel zahl von Straßen auf highway=secondary gesetzt.
 
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1Z8w

Das stimmt so nicht. Kannst du das bitte wieder korrigieren?

Danke und Gruß
WoSoe

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:highway
user_22332295 (2025-02-21 10:42:50+00:00): Sers, wird korrigiert
nikospag (2025-02-21 01:21:32+00:00): As discussed in forums here https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mass-edits-name-el/126067
nikospag (2025-02-21 01:21:07+00:00): As discussed in forums here https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mass-edits-name-el/126067
nikospag (2025-02-21 01:10:24+00:00): As discussed in forums here https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mass-edits-name-el/126067
stigar (2025-02-24 13:25:36+00:00): Hej! Kanon att du jobbar med busslinjerna i Växjö! Men Växjö stavas just så, utan s. Kan du uppdatera namnen på relationerna?
Hidoo00 (2025-02-24 14:33:38+00:00): Haha ja, absolut
andyman1 (2025-02-21 01:10:48+00:00): The gas pumps are branded Conoco, but clearly part of the 7-Eleven. which is more correct?
Tjuro (2025-02-21 09:27:12+00:00): Beste Rubenke,

Gelieve op te passen met het gebruik van de 
SurfaceOverlay aangezien deze schade kan veroorzaken.

Met vriendelijke groet,

Tjuro
opnsmcb (2025-05-16 10:20:41+00:00): Kann es sein, dass dir da ein Fehler unterlaufen ist? Du hast die Geschäfte in der Münsterstraße bearbeitet und dabei aus dreien zwei Juweliere gemacht. Es müsste aber so stimmen, wie ich es im Vorfeld eingetragen hatte. Also von der Ecke ausgehend: Juwelier Dimaschk Gold, Juwelier Safir, Juwelier Altinzade, Friseur King Cut, Eicafé Martin, Restaurant Bella Napoli, ...
Bienson (2025-06-02 20:31:06+00:00): Ja. Dritten Juwelier wiederhergestellt. Nördlichster erstmal ohne Namen - den kannst du dann wieder benennen - ob "Dimaschk Gold" oder doch "Damascus Gold" ...
Supaplex (2025-02-21 15:46:31+00:00): 因為使用非開放授權的資源來源而回退全部的變更集

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162786274
nevw (2025-02-22 00:46:11+00:00): You have deleted the outer scrub boundary
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=162763421 leaving two inners that osmi spotted
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.31352&lat=-37.91011&zoom=17
As the boundary was the 16th version it would be better to revert that part of the changeset.
I can try if you are unsure how to do it using Josm.
i2004 (2025-02-21 04:05:04+00:00): que cambios hiciste
Taya_S (2025-02-21 05:46:27+00:00): Reverted SEO vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162765353
AngocA (2025-02-21 04:06:20+00:00): No hay artículo en wikipedia español que sea sobre el Banco Roncador, sino solo sobre el Cayo Roncador que hace parte del Banco - https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roncador
surveyor54 (2025-02-21 08:48:54+00:00): Hallo vichada,
du änderst die Gebäudeumrisse (Footprints) anhand der hessischen Luftbilder.
Wäre es nicht besser und genauer ALKIS als Grundlage zu nutzen?
Es ist doch als Hintergrund in JOSM vorhanden.

Siehe auch hier:
https://postimg.cc/JDS3BmJW

Gruß
surveyor54
mavl (2025-05-13 15:08:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
ryivhnn (2025-02-22 01:45:28+00:00): It's still visible on aerial, maybe mark it as a recently demolished building (it's a thing in the id editor, the tag is demolished:building=yes) so some industrious soul (such as myself ^_^;) doesn't helpfully re-add it?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162764155
i2004 (2025-02-21 04:35:35+00:00): ahi yte hice la extension de la 119
dknelson9876 (2025-02-22 17:29:57+00:00): Hi Lkumar, the reason the middle portion of this street was separated is because there are bollards preventing vehicles using this as a through road. At the very least, you have removed the detail that the middle portion is a different surface. You could maybe make the argument that it should be considered a pedestrian street instead of a sidewalk, but residential street is definitely incorrect. Can you please correct your change?
YuliyaShustava_lyft (2025-02-25 12:18:04+00:00): Hi, Dknelson9876! 
My name is Yuliya, and I am the Quality Control Lead on the OSM team at Lyft. 

Thank you very much for bringing this correction to our attention. Unfortunately, we do not have clear evidence that the road is no longer designated for bicycles. I have reversed our changes in this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162929188. We sincerely apologize for changing the road type without proper justification.

Best regards, Yuliya
mavl (2025-05-13 15:06:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
HashFerret (2025-02-21 05:14:05+00:00): 🌳🌲🌴treeees🌳🌲🌴
NeisBot (2025-02-21 06:15:40+00:00): Hello, thank you for your contribution.

I noticed that some of the tags and descriptions you've used appear to be related to #SEO #spam. I recommend reading the following page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Spam

Could you please confirm if your map edits here were intentional?

#MapWithoutSpam #TagSmartNotSpam
LuckyNumberS7evin (2025-03-13 10:08:56+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/162792958