piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
uknown-gryphus (2023-12-01 17:50:28+00:00): Hi, thank you for your edit. However I noticed that you removed a link which clearly exists on the ground. Could you please re insert the link at Marathahalli bridge, it exists and is very much used by people on a daily basis.
mani_k2 (2023-12-03 05:53:51+00:00): Hi, Thank you for highlighting this. Connectivity provided as requested. FYI #144710988
jodd (2024-03-05 20:52:09+00:00): Hi,
du hast hier ja die Shisha-Bar eingetragen. Ich hatte sie aber vor 4 Jahren schon mal hinzugefügt (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7508745308). Hast du vermutlich übersehen. Kannst du dir das bitte mal anschauen? 
Danke :-)
GUFSZ (2024-03-06 06:41:22+00:00): Ich habe es sogar geschafft, deinen zweimal zu übersehen, weil ich die Öffnungszeiten nachgetragen habe. Öffnungszeiten habe ich an deinen Punkt angehängt und meinen gelöscht.
joost schouppe (2023-12-03 19:35:16+00:00): Hi Bear,
You added source:geometry:date and source:geometry:ref tags to these houses. This information is unique per building and cannot be copy-pasted from one building to the next. The ones you see in the data were added during an import, and are useful to help maintain the data in OSM.
Check the last section of this wiki for some more info:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Belgium/Building_and_address_import
Bear-in-a-box (2023-12-04 14:36:47+00:00): OMG! I am learning so many new things. Thanks, mate!
joost schouppe (2023-12-04 17:46:01+00:00): Glad you're happy to get feedback :)
NeisBot (2023-12-29 08:59:58+00:00): Hello,
 thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.

Thanks!

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
SomeoneElse2 (2023-12-01 10:56:13+00:00): What I can't see is how you'd easily cross east to west.  Also, lots of other NCN52 is missing here.
SunnyIsland10 (2023-12-12 20:59:03+00:00): Greetings TheMiner:

I noticed that you updated the ref tag along different road segments on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/264325240 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/774734555 from ref=R-459 to R-II-4503. Do you have any resources or documentation that supports this ref change? I don’t see this ref on the https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Diagrams_of_regional_road_number_signs_of_Bosnia_and_Herzegovina.

I am also curious of the access=no tag along these road segments https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/778645515 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/778645520. Is this road currently open to the public? Currently this tag would block routing on these roads. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Dno for more information.

Happy Mapping

Thank you,
SunnyIsland10


(Automatic translation)
Pozdrav TheMiner:

Primetio sam da ste ažurirali ref tag duž različitih segmenata puta na https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/264325240 i https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/774734555 sa ref=R-459 na R-II -4503. Imate li neke resurse ili dokumentaciju koja podržava ovu promjenu ref? Ne vidim ovu referencu na https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Diagrams_of_regional_road_number_signs_of_Bosnia_and_Herzegovina.

Također me zanima oznaka access=no duž ovih segmenata ceste https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/778645515 i https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/778645520. Da li je ovaj put trenutno otvoren za javnost? Trenutno bi ova oznaka blokirala usmjeravanje na ovim cestama. Pogledajte https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Dno za više informacija.

Sretno mapiranje

Hvala ti,
SunnyIsland10
TheMiner (2023-12-13 06:30:48+00:00): Pozdrav, SunnyIsland10

Vlada Republike Srpske je 31.10.2019. godine donijela Odluku o razvrstavanju javnih puteva - kojom su numerisani javni putevi na teritoriji RS.
Ranija numeracija magistralnih i regionalnih puteva bila je iz perioda SFRJ.

Link ka Službenom glasniku gdje je objavljena Odluka: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwjn_pWf44uDAxUFgf0HHfvdCzwQFnoECAkQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.vladars.net%2Fsr-SP-Cyrl%2FVlada%2FMinistarstva%2Fmsv%2FDocuments%2F%25D0%259E%25D0%25B4%25D0%25BB%25D1%2583%25D0%25BA%25D0%25B0%2520%25D0%25BE%2520%25D1%2580%25D0%25B0%25D0%25B7%25D0%25B2%25D1%2580%25D1%2581%25D1%2582%25D0%25B0%25D0%25B2%25D0%25B0%25D1%259A%25D1%2583%2520%25D1%2598%25D0%25B0%25D0%25B2%25D0%25BD%25D0%25B8%25D1%2585%2520%25D0%25BF%25D1%2583%25D1%2582%25D0%25B5%25D0%25B2%25D0%25B0_406181601.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2fF7GuEV5d_cCD9W9vjqQF&opi=89978449

Takođe, segmenti ceste sa oznakom access=no, odnose se na dijelove regionalnog puta (raniji naziv R459) koji se nalazi na teritoriji površinskog kopa rudnika Ugljevik i koji je uništen eksploatacijom. Put defakto ne postoji i postoji zabrana saobraćaja.

Zabrana saobraćaja se redovno objavljuje na stranici Automoto saveza RS: https://ams-rs.com/stanje-na-putevima-opste-informacije/

"Због опасности од појаве клизишта, на регионалном путу Р-I 4503 (Р-459), дионица С. Угљевик-Главичице, у рејону С. Угљевика забрањен је саобраћај за сва возила, а за теретна возила између предузећа Рудинг, у мјесту Вучјак и раскрснице у Мезграји. Путничка возила се преусмјеравају преко локалног пута Модран-Угљевик Село, а теретна магистралним путем М-I 113 (М-18) Суво Поље-Доња Трнова-Главичице-Мезграја. Напомињемо да се наведена забрана саобраћаја не односи на возила РиТЕ Угљевик."

Pozdrav.
SunnyIsland10 (2023-12-14 19:38:38+00:00): Greetings TheMiner,

Thank you for providing the resource that was used to make the ref updates. While looking into the new ref format, I noticed some contradicting resources that either have a dash before the number or a space before the number, when “-I" or “-II" is present. Could you please confirm if the new ref format should be "R-II-4503” or "R-II 4503”?

Thank you for providing this helpful information, 

SunnyIsland10

(Automatic translation) 
Pozdrav TheMiner,

Hvala vam što ste dali resurse koji su korišteni za ažuriranje ref. Gledajući u novi format ref, primijetio sam neke kontradiktorne resurse koji imaju ili crticu ispred broja ili razmak ispred broja, kada je prisutno “-I” ili “-II”. Možete li potvrditi da li bi novi format ref trebao biti "R-II-4503" ili "R-II 4503"?

Hvala vam što ste dali ove korisne informacije,

SunnyIsland10
Strubbl (2023-12-01 18:14:48+00:00): Hi Polffw, 
gibt es seit neuestem bei den von dir in Putbus geänderten Kreuzungen Zebrastreifen? Falls nicht, wäre die Änderung so nicht korrekt, siehe:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:crossing=uncontrolled
und
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:crossing=unmarked

Viele Grüße
Nakaner (2023-12-01 12:43:03+00:00): Hallo,

herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.

OSM ist ein Gemeinschaftsprojekt, zu dem viele verschiedene Leute beitragen. Damit andere Beitragende deine Beiträge leichter nachvollziehen können, möchte ich dich bitten, beim Hochladen einen aussagekräftigen Änderungssatzkommentar anzugeben. Siehe hierzu auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Viele Grüße

Michael
user_17763663 (2023-12-01 12:50:16+00:00): geht um ein Update der Kreisverkehre und sonstigen sachen, merke ich mir fürs nächste mal
woodpeck (2023-12-06 21:09:52+00:00): Dear osmantarkut, in this (your first) changeset you have deleted a lot of data from OSM and you have not given a good reason, only: "not". This makes your edit suspicious and I have reverted it. If you want to delete something from OSM, provide a clear reason in the upload comment - why/when has the thing ceased to exist?
SunnyIsland10 (2025-06-24 21:44:21+00:00): Greetings TheMiner

I noticed several highway ref changes in Bosnia and Herzegovina. For example, R459a being updated to R-I 4104 in this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144658497#map=11/44.7769/19.1054

Have you been able to verify these road signs in person, or have you found any evidence of these road signs online?

Have a great day,
SunnyIsland10
osmoj (2023-12-02 01:57:28+00:00): Hallo caterman,
ich habe deine Änderungen auf Fehler überprüft. Folgende Dinge solltest du aus meiner Sicht noch beheben:

1. relation/16774851 (Lidl)
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16774851
- Mitglied#1: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29449642
- Mitglied#2: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1227999719
- Hier ist das Gebäude kaputt gegangen
- Der Umriss ist unvollständig, (!) nicht geschlossen und in zwei Linien geteilt
- Der Umriss muss geschlossen werden, wobei die neu entstandene Linie (Mitglied#2) zur alten (Mitglied#2) wieder hinzufügen wäre
- Die Relation muss wieder gelöscht werden und deren Tags and den wiederhergestellten Umriss verschoben werden.

2. way/1227999711 (Packstation 164)
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1227999711
- `opening_hours` sollte möglichst eine Regel für `PH` enthalten  
  Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours#Examples > 24/7
- Der Umriss sollte rechteckig sein  
  (Im iD-Editor als Rechtsklick-Funktion verfügbar)
- Der Umriss sollte nicht mit dem nebenstehenden Gebäude verbunden sein, wenn die Packetstation freistehend ist

3. way/1227999712 (Packstation 187)
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1227999712
- gleiche Hinweise wie in Punkt 2

4. way/1227999713 (Packstation 191)
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1227999713
- gleiche Hinweise wie in Punkt 2

5. way/1227999720 (Packstation 170)
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1227999720
- 24/7 sollte in `opening_hours` lieber nicht verwendet werden, weil unklar ist, ob es `PH` mit einschließt. Besser stattdessen `Mo-Su 0:00-24:00` oder `Mo-Su,PH 0:00-24:00` verwenden.
  Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours#Examples > 24/7
- Der Umriss sollte rechteckig sein  
  (Im iD-Editor als Rechtsklick-Funktion verfügbar)

6. way/1227999714 (Packetstation 143)
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1227999714
- gleiche Hinweise, wie Punkt 2 und 4

7. node/11387518597 (Gebäudeecke)
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11387518597
- sollte nicht mit dem daneben verlaufenden Weg verbunden sein

8. way/1227999716 (Volleyballplatz)
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1227999716
- Der Umriss sollte rechteckig sein  
  (Im iD-Editor als Rechtsklick-Funktion verfügbar)

Viele Grüße
osmoj
osmoj (2023-12-02 02:00:15+00:00): Zu Punkt 1:
- Es sollte noch der Änderungsvorschlag von iD angewendet werden
```
+ brand=Lidl
+ brand:wikidata=Q151954
- name=LIDL
+ name=Lidl
```
eggie (2023-12-01 13:44:06+00:00): Beste spamark.. dan is motor_vehicle =no voldoende.
Je hoeft niet nogmaals access=no te taggen.
Mvg
eggie
eggie (2023-12-01 13:50:30+00:00): Wanneer landbouwverkeer is toegestaan dan agricultural=yes..
Bijtaggen.
.. access=no is bijna altijd 'fout'.
Dat is bv voor militair terrein.
eggie (2023-12-01 14:05:37+00:00): access=no foot=yes en bicycle yes verwijderd. Dat laatste hoeft niet op reguliere wegen. 
agricultural=yes en traffic_sign=NL:C12  toegevoegd. 
De rendering van de track zal straks wel weer terugkomen. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-12-01 14:15:13+00:00): tractorsluis toegevoegd
Patchanka (2023-12-03 10:00:23+00:00): bonjour
vous avez ajouté cet élément en tant que café mais vous indiquez "Salon de coiffure" dans le nom. 
Quelles est l'activité principale ? 
De plus quel est le nom de ce commerce ? Le nom que vous avez indiqué ressemble plutôt à une description. 
Merci d'avance
bkil (2023-12-02 11:41:44+00:00): Do you speak Hungarian? This path was checked recently and still existed back then. It was marked as smoothness=horrible. Maybe it has poor visibility? I have reverted this until you respond.
VLD549 (2024-03-30 08:12:35+00:00): Hi, could you please explain what the name change from Wassen to Wassen UR is based on? Perhaps with a link?

Thank you!
Wikilux (2024-03-30 08:21:25+00:00): The name is based on swisstopo for the map and on GWR for the addresseshttps://map.geo.admin.ch/?layers=ch.bfs.gebaeude_wohnungs_register&topic=ech&lang=de&bgLayer=ch.swisstopo.pixelkarte-farbe&zoom=8&E=2688967.50&N=1173396.19
VLD549 (2024-04-04 13:20:05+00:00): Thanks !
trigpoint (2023-12-02 15:55:13+00:00): Paving stones sounds a bit odd here as they are normally used outdoors.

I would expect some sort of tiles?

Cheers Phil
user_8655426 (2023-12-30 09:16:58+00:00): こんにちは。
この変更セットで、広範囲にわたり大量のPOI(店舗や施設など)をOpenStreetMapに追加されていますが、それらの名称や位置などの情報はどのようにして調べましたか？
OpenStreetMapの情報源として不適切なデータソースを利用した可能性があります。

利用可能なデータソース
https://openstreetmap.jp/node/764

編集のもととなった情報源を教えてください。よろしくお願いします。
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144659910
user_8655426 (2024-01-07 09:01:07+00:00): 追加されたPOIの情報におかしなものが多く、返信をいただけなかったため(ソースが不明のため)、この変更セットをリバートしました。(編集の巻き戻し)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145982259

地図の編集に利用された MAPS.ME は OpenStreetMap (OSM) の地図データを使用しています。MAPS.ME のデータを変更すれば、OSM のデータも変更されてしまいます。情報の入力方法(タグ付け)についても、OSMのコミュニティが定めたルール(書式など)が存在します。
OpenStreetMap がどのようなプロジェクトなのかは、以下のページでご確認ください。

・OpenStreetMap へようこそ 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/welcome

・JA:初心者ガイド
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:初心者ガイド

・データの情報源
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Beginners_Guide_1.1

「個人用の目印やメモなど」を MAPS.ME に追加したいのであれば、ブックマーク機能を使うのがよいと思います。

・MAPS.ME SUPPORT (英語)
https://mapsme.zendesk.com/hc/en-us
laznik (2024-03-17 10:37:50+00:00): ten drenazny rigol nad Zibritovom je nejaky podozrivy. Ak je zdrojom pre jeho existenciu v OSM db len lidar vrstva, tak by som odporucal ho odstranit. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1223995308/history#map=16/48.3965/18.9683
macdale (2024-03-17 12:34:55+00:00): Zdravim. Dakujem za komentar. 

Rigol som naznacil nielen podla lidarovych snimok, ale aj na zaklade osobnej obhliadky terenu z pred 2-och rokov. 

V niektorych castiach je rigol jasne identifikovatelny, inde zaneseny. Cely rigol je vyspadovany. 

Blizsie info sa mi od miestnych zatial nepodarilo zistit. Jedna sa vsak pravdepodobne o presmerovanie vod z potocika vytekajuceho z pod vrchu Kacerky (jedneho z pramenisk potoka Bebrava), ktory sezonne steka cez luky nad dnesnou nadrzou Zibritov. Rigol sluzil pravdepodobne na dvodnenie luk a zahrad v lokalite pod Siročinami a zaroven ako sucast melioracnych uprav pri zalkladani dnes uz nejestvujuceho sadu.

Podla vsetkeho bol vykopany este pred vybudovanim Zibritovskej vodnej nadrze, ale je mozne, ze priamo suvisel so zalozenim spominaneho sadu, ktory mal svoj vlastny zavlahovy system (pod nadrzou dodnes stoji plechova buda strojovne s cerpadlom, ktore vytlacalo vodu do dopotrubia a ktoreho vyvody mozno najst na lukach nad nadrzou aj dnes).

Ak ste miestny a viete o tomto nieco viac, budem velmo rad o vase korekcie ako informacne, tak aj na mape.

S pozdravom Michal
laznik (2024-03-17 16:42:46+00:00): dakujem za odpoved. Je to zaujimavy utvar. Na ortofoto z 50-tych rokov[1] tam nic nevidno, ale podla eroznych ryh zostupujucich popri asfaltke pretinajucich rigol by som odhadoval, ze ta struktura moze byt este starsia. Pozrel som aj mapy vojenskeho mapovania a podla linii na mape z III v.m. som nasiel cosi, co by mohol byt pokracovanie/dalsia pripojka[3].

Pojdem sa tam niekedy pozriet aj ja, ale vyzera to legitimne.

[1] https://mapy.tuzvo.sk/HOFM/
[2] https://shorturl.at/dqE05
[3] https://shorturl.at/dovwV
macdale (2024-03-17 23:40:22+00:00): Zdravim, este som si to lepsie porovnal a radsej som to skratil na cast, ktoru podla osbnej obhliadky viem, ze bola vybudovana ako rigol. Jedna sa o usek od odklonenia potoka po hradsku cestu. Tam bola pravdepodobne voda zvedena iba do kanala popri ceste. Z prvu som si myslel, ze pokracoavnie by mohlo mat suvis s uz nejestvujucim sadom nad nadrzou a jeho dnes uz nefunkcnym zavlazoavcim systemom. 

Po vasom upozorneni som si vsak lepsie pozrel pokracovanie tejto linie, ktora, okrem vami naznacenej linie, pokracuje po takmer 90° zboceni JV smerom az k Stangariglu. Takato linia, ktora ma charakter takmer pravidelne prerusovanej rovnej ciary sa potom nachadza aj na severe, kde sa tiahne popod Buzalkov vrch az k Zliabku. 

Podobnych prikladov som si vsimol aj na inych lukach. Tam kde boli taketo linie vybudovane  lahko identifikovat podla ortofotomapy z 50-tych rokov. Na nej pekne vidno styky niektorych luk s lesom akoby narysovane podla pravitka. Presne v tychto miestach sa daju na lidare lokalizovat aj taketo linie.

Pojde teda asi iba o akysi typ “vodozadrzneho opatrenia”, ktorym sa zadrziavala voda nad lukami aby nedochadzalo k ich zmacaniu. K comu presne vsak tieto diela sluzili a kto ich vybudoval, by mozno vedel objasnit nejaky lesnik.

Este raz dakujem za upozornenie!
Miso

PS Este taka mala zaujimavost. Mozno ste sa uz s tym stretli na lidare stretli, ale kruhove terenne plosinky, ktore sa nachadzaju v vo vascine lesoch po takmer celom Slovensku, su miesta, na ktorych stali v minulosti miliere a kde sa palilo drevene uhlie. V okoli Stiavnice ich bolo vdaka hutam neurekom:)
arjunaraoc (2023-12-28 04:56:37+00:00): Hello Amal Ameen,
Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). 

It is better to keep the buildings follow rectangular shape when creating from aerial images. JOSM editor has building plugin which can be helpful if your focus is on creating buildings.

Happy mapping!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144660109
ivanbranco (2024-03-21 00:06:51+00:00): Hi luky89,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1227989834/history

the tag layer here seems to be wrong, maybe it was supposed to be something else?
luky89 (2024-03-21 08:33:07+00:00): Thank you, yes it was bad tag. Correct tag is ref. I fixed it
HellMap (2023-12-01 15:32:45+00:00): Sveiki!

Vai šie tiešām ir brasli https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11387611475 un https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11387611454? Ortofoto izskatās pēc tipiskām caurtekām grāvjiem.
Emmanuel Arrechea (2025-01-03 14:51:03+00:00): Salut Alban,
Je me suis rendu compte qu'en ajoutant l’œuvre "Ostau Herriko", tu as transformé le bâtiment de la mairie en "œuvre" via le tag "artwork_type=mural". Puisque l’œuvre est marquée par un point, pourrais-tu remettre sur le bâtiment Hôtel de Ville le tag "amenity=townhall" pour lui rendre sa fonction de mairie.
D'avance merci, si ça n'est pas clair, n'hésite pas à m'appeler.
Donlooba411 (2025-01-03 22:55:41+00:00): Salut Manu, je crois que j'ai pigé et merci pour ta veille ^^
Sauf erreur, j'ai modifié le type du bâtiment. J'espère que c'est ok !
a+
A
Emmanuel Arrechea (2025-01-04 12:13:06+00:00): C'est parfait Alban. A très vite
KKS (2023-12-02 19:54:53+00:00): Шось ти і тут фігні наробив... таке як не твоє це
Herman Lee (2023-12-01 14:17:46+00:00): 哥们手不要太快www，这边全冲突了
osmviborg (2023-12-01 12:49:14+00:00): 3. gang er lykkens gang
cserpell (2023-12-02 23:13:38+00:00): Hola, gracias por los aportes. Por favor intenta encuadrar los edificios luego de dibujarlos con la letra "q" o "s" (no recuerdo bien ahora cuál de las dos es), o con el botón derecho -> escuadrar.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144660951
silversurfer83 (2023-12-01 13:16:02+00:00): Gude und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap :)

schön, dass du hilfst die Karte zu verbessern.

Ich habe die "Formerstraße" mal wieder zu einer Straße gemacht, nachdem du, mit Sicherheit aus Versehen, die Haupteigenschaft, gelöscht hast.

https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/22958412

Happy mapping, und bei Fragen immer raus damit

silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144661012
companiesDE (2023-12-01 13:54:01+00:00): Hallo silversurfer83,
bitte entschuldige meinen Fehler bezüglich der Formerstraße. War ein Versehen meinerseits. 
Vielen dank für die Korrektur.
RicoElectrico (2023-12-01 13:56:02+00:00): Hi, I think your selection of the object type is not correct. Have a look at the Wiki description. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Ddrain
Nakaner-repair (2023-12-01 12:47:23+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 144582819, 144582986, 144585523, 144585790, 144591797, 144619751, 144621279, 144626748, 144656345, 144656562, 144656681, 144656869, 144657130, 144658140.
cserpell (2023-12-02 23:14:08+00:00): Hola, por favor usar la etiqueta de jardín infantil.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144661220
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-15 10:09:57+00:00): Cleaned up remaining SEO spam and other tagging for POI in changeset 184129456

https://osm.org/changeset/184129456
eggie (2023-12-01 13:56:13+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
merylstreet (2023-12-10 18:07:08+00:00): Hello, 
Are you sure node 1799971859 Residhome Apart Hotel was closed down? I think I saw it a few days ago
Snusmumriken (2023-12-10 18:45:01+00:00): I might have made a mistake. Not in Nice right now so I can't verify. I remember that there was a duplicate and probably should have deleted https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/140818117
Not the building, but the hotel and kept Residhome Apart Hotel
merylstreet (2023-12-11 10:56:54+00:00): OK no problem, I will change Hotel Citadine to Residhome and make it a node.
eggie (2023-12-01 13:56:55+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Frans S (2023-12-03 09:31:40+00:00): Hello. I reviewed this changset as well.
This building is not proper mapped. You just mapped a few building within the building structure. Map the whole bulding and insert courtyards where you can spot them
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144662131
KasperSFranz (2023-12-01 20:23:50+00:00): This should have been split to two different changesets - sorry
JassKurn (2023-12-01 15:17:34+00:00): Hi,

I was in Exeter today had a look at this store. I've made a couple of changes to the Wilko data. I've moved it onto the node where the store data had previously been.

There is a problem with the wikidata tag that I'm not sure about how to solve. This is not the old Wilko reopened. The old Wilko business is gone, with valuable parts split up and sold. CDS Superstores bought the name "Wilko" and several of the old stores. They have today opened a store at this site with the name Wilko, but it's not the previous business, and there is a sign inside the entrance stating this new Wilko is not the old Wilko business.

This causes and issue with wikidata tag. The wikidata tag is clearly for the old Wilkinson business and not the new brand. 

I've removed the wikidata tag, Not sure how to handle this but I think I'll send an email to the talk_GB mailing lists in a few day.
TheUKHighStreet (2023-12-01 15:49:42+00:00): Thanks - I added it to the way because I looked at the history and that was previously tagged as Wilko https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/538847858/history

I think the wikidata page just needs updating with the new owner. They have bought the name, website and have access to the social media of the old company. The facebook page is a continuation of the old page and says "We're back!". I'm not sure what the benefit is of using new tags.
map per (2023-12-01 18:24:14+00:00): Wegen review_requested:
Die Änderung sieht gut aus, danke!
Dawid2849 (2023-12-01 21:44:44+00:00): Jakie jest źródło tej ulicy?
b-holdet (2023-12-01 13:53:17+00:00): 👍
SekeRob (2023-12-02 09:36:24+00:00): Hi,

Fixed shop... broke opening_hours. Plz 'fix'

ciao
SekeRob (2023-12-02 09:44:16+00:00): Seems 2 QA progs disagree, but the last bit can supposedly be written as Dec 25,26 off