piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
gscholz (2024-09-25 07:47:05+00:00): 

Hi Mateus23,
your recent changesets have created a lot of errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-46.96119&lat=-22.43908&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas

As you may know, this kind of errors irritate routing software and looks ugly on the maps. Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
NorthCrab_upload (2024-09-09 15:01:06+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12165725708

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-09-14 11:21:57+00:00): Reviewed
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156398560
silversurfer83 (2024-09-09 16:57:12+00:00): Hi :)

kleiner Tip für deine weitere Arbeit hier, damit deiner Ergebnisse noch besser werden:
Aufzählungen bei tags wie "brand=*", "cuisine=*" und ähnlichen werden ohne Leerzeichen nur durch ";" getrennt aufgeschrieben. Hier wäre das dann "brand=Subaru;Suzuki".

happy mapping
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156399027
chris66 (2024-10-30 09:02:20+00:00): Die Umleitung funktioniert nicht, siehe:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4427475
[no-name] (2024-09-13 09:25:59+00:00): Beste jonathand299,

Bij deze wijzigingen heb jij:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/35443426

verplaats tot aan de parkeerplaats bij Oudenoord
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/180626934

Gelieve in de toekomst dit niet meer te doen en meer op te letten voor onbedoelde verplaatsingen.

Ik heb het opgelost.

Met vriendelijke groet,

Tjuro
NorthCrab_upload (2024-09-09 15:20:58+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/331451721

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
John1984 (2024-09-09 21:18:12+00:00): Hey! This is actually true. I can confirm that. This street is on Google Maps and Bing Maps
SekeRob repair (2024-09-11 13:43:33+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for mapping in Italy.
You left some unconnected ways. fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156485074

ciao

PS, we don't speak German here so doing your CS comments in local or language or English would be much appreciated.
eggie (2024-09-09 15:45:42+00:00): Dag Roy  Alle gebouwen zijn import vanuit de BAG (Kadaster) en als zodanig precies ingemeten. Soms is er al geïmporteerd terwijl er nog moet worden ingemeten. Ik leg het nu even met de hand goed, maar je kunt in het vervolg ook om herimpport vragen via het forum van OSM middels het draadje BAG importverzoeken. 
Naar de dakvorm kijken is geen strak plan. Dat klopt niet.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-09-09 15:49:05+00:00): Het hele blokje goed gelegd mbv de BGT. Het lijkt dan verkeerd, maar het klopt precies. Niet naar de daken kijken.
gr eggie
eggie (2024-09-09 15:50:00+00:00): Ook nog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
John1984 (2024-09-09 21:19:54+00:00): I checked Google Maps and Bing Maps. There is a street already built here. This is a useful change.
PubUpdater (2024-09-11 09:13:52+00:00): For Byrne’s of Galloping Green pub, the deleted node had some extra details like address,contact, payment etc. Will they be copied to the way?
Own Oh (2024-09-11 09:44:25+00:00): Have done so: opening hours, website etc
PubUpdater (2024-09-11 10:52:46+00:00): But if you look at the history of the node, you can see there was contact details, payment details and others:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/683894548/history
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-12 02:35:36+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164838879
Dan 9 (2024-11-11 14:02:33+00:00): Herăstrău (1314399765) este un duplicat in mare parte locației mai vechi a Herăstrău (1278494792).
GretaMN (2024-09-12 17:14:46+00:00): Liebe:r Nicknam,
bitte nutze den tracktype=* Tag nur auf Wirtschafts-, Feld- oder Waldwegen, die von zweispurigen Fahrzeugen gefahren werden können. Dafür ist er gedacht, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:tracktype und LG Maps Ausfüllhilfe. Danke! :)
VG, Greta
#lgmaps
Nicknam (2024-09-14 11:03:08+00:00): Hi Greta,
Das stimmt natürlich!
Ich hab den Tag wohl stehen lassen, da er im vorhinein schon da war.
Soll ich Ihn löschen, oder zumindest eine Löschanfrage an den Menschen vor mir schicken,  oder einfach stehen lassen?
LG Nick.
GretaMN (2024-09-14 16:52:25+00:00): Hey Nick,
ich würde denken, du kannst ihn hier löchen.
VG, Greta
Nicknam (2024-09-14 17:02:27+00:00): Oki, ist gemacht.
gscholz (2024-09-27 08:38:38+00:00): Hi CQD35,
your recent edits have left behind several errors regarding overlapping ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-2.35807&lat=48.51219&zoom=10&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=156400838

As you may know, this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps. Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
martinst (2024-09-09 17:13:17+00:00): Hallo GPX3T,
ist der Way 1314402675 (wegen der Breite) nicht eher ein Fahrweg, also highway=track ?
Gruß Martin
vojtechzaboril (2024-09-09 15:50:18+00:00): Edit: source is Bing; survey
ydubras (2024-09-09 16:11:05+00:00): Grazas pola contribución, pero as ciclovías non haberían de mapearse como vías separadas se forman parte intrínseca da estrada ou non hai unha separación física entre elas (ver o wiki), e neste caso é así. Os carrís bici da Avenida do Burgo das Nacións xa estaban indicados con etiquetaxe na vía.
Gabriel44200 (2024-09-11 15:55:47+00:00): Okey, corrixido
WWSS (2025-05-15 09:09:05+00:00): ford=yes 是用於涉水而過的地方，此次編輯將許多水道與道路連結，錯誤非常大啊！
NorthCrab_upload (2024-09-09 16:10:57+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/264352213

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NeisBot (2024-09-09 16:06:38+00:00): Hi ParksGuy, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 81% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 6 highway(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=156402100
ParksGuy (2024-09-09 17:14:21+00:00): Yes, this should be correct. New trails have been planned and constructed across this land. Remnant deleted roads are abandoned and efforts are being focused on revegetation to dissuade use.
pitscheplatsch (2024-09-10 06:32:07+00:00): Thank you for your answer.

Wouldn't it have been better to add a disused tag to the way instead of removing it?

Otherwise it could happen that another mapper remap the way in a week based on the aerial image.
ParksGuy (2024-09-10 16:02:06+00:00): Perhaps. I am new to openstreetmap, so I was unaware of that feature/tag.
eggie (2024-09-09 18:11:25+00:00): Dag Rhonus. Probeer zoveel mogelijk op de bestaande adresnodes bij te taggen. Dus geen adressen aanmaken.
Mvg
eggie
jeslop (2024-09-09 17:02:21+00:00): Hola Jabalín, ¿cuál es la fuente para ese nombre de la senda? ¿O es conocida así entre los ciclistas? Si es lo segundo la etiqueta debe ser mtb:name, no name: 

Saludos,
Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
Jabalín Juancar (2024-09-09 21:18:22+00:00): Hola Jesus, es como la conocemos los ciclistas de la zona. Si hay que cambiar algo, puedes tu ? Mi nivel OSM no da para eso aun, gracias!!
jeslop (2024-09-10 08:49:14+00:00): Hola Jabalin, no te preocupes, ya lo cambio. Si quieres saber más sobre etiquetas especñificas de mtb consulta https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Ciclismo_de_monta%C3%B1a.

La comunidad local también estará encantada de ayudarte con tus dudas. Puedes contactar a través del foro (https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/es/51), la lista de correo (https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-es) o el canal de telegram (https://t.me/OSMes).

Saludos,
Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
flohoff (2024-10-07 08:16:55+00:00): Moin,
ich habe hier das Dach vorne abgetrennt. Das ist zwar auch das Gebäudeoutline, hat aber ja andere Eigenschaften.

Flo
eggie (2024-09-09 17:59:54+00:00): Zo kan het als daar niemand naar dat huis mag rijden.
Bij access=private moet ook aangegeven staan dat toegang verboden is. 
Het is wel zo dat het hier niet meer voor bezorgdiensten routeert.
Vaker wordt permissive getagd.
MVG
eggie
HirschKauz (2024-09-10 15:44:17+00:00): Salut!  
cette syntaxe access:.... n'est malheureusement pas lisible par les génerateurs de cartes. 

Tu pensais certainement à: 
motor_vehicle:conditional=yes @ (.....) 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Restrictions_conditionnelles 

cordialement
jbcharron (2024-09-10 16:41:25+00:00): Bien vu
En fait le sujet est venu sur le forum OSM FR et j'ai repris l'exemple d'un autre contributeur
C'est corrigé ici https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156449091
Merci pour ta vigilance
Carto'Cité (2024-11-11 11:11:20+00:00): Hi Fishter,
I found this info about the new cycleway in L'Étang-la-Ville that you started to describe: https://www.letanglaville.fr/Accueil/2019/4636

I'm gonna use this sketchy plan to draw the rest of the cycleway. But if you were on site and tell me it is not as described on the plan, I'll withdraw my contribution.
Regards
Charles from Carto’Cité for #CartoVeloIdF
dypa (2024-09-11 07:26:05+00:00): Для чего вы удалили наименования? Теперь вместо скейт-парка и памп-трека по тегам osm есть 2 скейт парка.

Вы забыли свою рекомендацию https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142281401 "не удаляйте пожалуйста полезные данные" и "Да и просто, помогает ориентироваться" ???
Константин Гам (2024-09-11 08:54:48+00:00): 
На местности не найдено данных названий
dypa (2024-09-11 09:03:31+00:00): На местности есть информационные стенды по использованию этих сооружений с указанными названиями
Константин Гам (2024-09-11 12:07:18+00:00): Быть может. Но в случае спортивных площадок характеристики выносить в название - излижне.
Константин Гам (2024-09-11 12:08:56+00:00): Уж скейтпарк в случае leisure=sport + sport=skateboard не имеет точно никаких противоречий. Эти теги и обозначают "скейтпарк".
Про "памп-трек" можно порассуждать может, хотя по сути такой же стейт-парк.

А на местности катаются там вовсе не самокатах и пьют пиво. Можно добавить amenity=bar + samokat=yes ;)
Константин Гам (2024-09-11 12:18:19+00:00): Во! Есть же cycle=pump_track.
Супер. значит тащить это в название не нужно.

Спасибо за уточнение.
Константин Гам (2024-09-11 12:19:39+00:00): Когда будет : Памп-Трек "Ижора-памп" в name надо будет написать "Ижора-памп" без каких-либо описаний. А не текущий момент, name пуст.
dypa (2024-09-11 15:12:56+00:00): cycle=pump_track нет вики, есть  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cycling%3Dpump_track и тот используется только для way

>Когда будет : Памп-Трек "Ижора-памп" в name надо будет написать "Ижора-памп" без каких-либо описаний. А не текущий момент, name пуст. 
перечитайте пожалуйста https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:name - в ваших правках встречаются магазины с названием "Продукты", что является ровно тем же самым что и написание "Скейт-парк" в name
Константин Гам (2024-09-11 22:32:46+00:00): Давайте начнем с того, что все нарисованное в этом парке хочется стереть напрочь.

Почему? Я не знаю откуда вы срисовывали сквер, но координаты не соответствуют реальности, смещение 3 метра...
Я бы разбирался с этим, для начала.
dypa (2024-09-15 15:49:10+00:00): >Давайте начнем с того, что все нарисованное в этом парке хочется стереть напрочь.
вы так уже поступали в https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141579584

>Я не знаю откуда вы срисовывали сквер, но координаты не соответствуют реальности, смещение 3 метра...
с плана работ, который привязан был по трекам с местности. смещение 3 метра для телефона это хороший результат. асфальтовая дорожка https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1212686302 привязывалась к сохранившимуся ряду тополей на снимке

>Я бы разбирался с этим, для начала.
с этим было бы проще разбираться, если бы вы не подвинули https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1173248102 в https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156490952 и объекты не накладывались друг на друга
keithonearth (2024-09-10 20:03:38+00:00): Thanks for updating this, I'd not heard that news.
GretaMN (2024-09-12 17:39:40+00:00): Liebe:r Nicknam,
bitte überarbeite hier (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/822508958) das passende Tagging an der Linie zum Verkehrsschild DE:240.
Danke! :)
VG, Greta
#lgmaps
GretaMN (2024-09-12 17:43:56+00:00): P.S. Und bitte ergänze bei einem highway=path immer auch die Wegbreite (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/718136272 & https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/718136271).
Nicknam (2024-09-14 11:13:50+00:00): Hi Greta, 
1. Verkehrsschildstagging und 2. Wegbreite sind hinzugefügt. Nur bei 3. (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/718136271) ist die Wegbreite berits vorhanden gewesen. Meinstest du einen anderen Weg?
LG Nick.
GretaMN (2024-09-14 16:54:51+00:00): Hey Nick, 
danke dir! Und das stimmt, tut mir leid. Ich weiß gerade leider auch nicht mehr, welchen Weg ich stattdessen gemeint haben könnte.
Josef73 (2024-10-22 16:46:19+00:00): Hello, can you check the value of the tag opening_hours? Thanks
BCNorwich (2024-09-09 18:31:04+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've reverted this changeset because the highway you added was already mapped. Thus, the new highway was a duplication that could disrupt routing.

Could you explain what you were trying to do, perhaps I could help.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2024-09-09 18:35:24+00:00): Hi, I've reverted this changeset as FP 16 is already mapped.

Regards Bernard.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-09-14 11:10:27+00:00): Why were these rectangles added? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1314175466/history
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156405442
BCNorwich (2024-09-09 18:39:22+00:00): The changeset was reverted as FP 5 was already mapped.
BCNorwich (2024-09-11 07:09:58+00:00): Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I know you have good intentions for adding Sheffield Road Cycleway but unfortunately, there are many problems. There are 18 warnings of crossing highways as stated above. This is because a large part of the new highway (SRC) is placed on top of the existing cycleway. Also in places the cycleway presence  is tagged of the main highway, (cycleway:both=track). You've drawn the cycleway crossing several roads without a joining to them. Also the cycleway has been joined to underground cables.

For these reasons I think it's best to revert this changeset. I can do the revert for you if you wish?

Regards Bernard.
DeliciousLancashireHotpot (2024-09-11 13:00:16+00:00): Hi Bernard,

Very much a newby so happy to defer to your better judgement. So I can learn, what should I have done to get these shown as seperate cycle tracks (such as the Attercliffe Cycleway is adjacent to Woodburn Road in Sheffield). 

Many Thanks 

David
BCNorwich (2024-09-12 07:14:36+00:00): Hi David, The cycleway section you refer to has been drawn on it's right and separate from the main carriageway. Woodburn Road is not tagged as having a cycleway on either side.

To make your Sheffield Road Cycleway similar to the Attercliffe Cycleway you would have to amend the relevant sections of highways that are tagged as cycleway:both=, cycleway:left= and/or cycleway:right=.  You would also have to amend/correct the Relation: Rotherham Local Cycle Network (17613385), https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17613385 .  You would have to amend/correct all the places where the Sheffield Road Cycleway crosses over other highways, making the correct crossing description tag if possible. Bear in mind also that there might be complaints from the folks that mapped the existing cycleway, which I don't see as incorrect.

I wouldn't want to do the above, thus my suggestion to revert the changeset.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2024-09-12 07:21:40+00:00): Hi, I now see that your new cycleway Way: 1314420827 is tagged as layer=-1 which means it's below ground level. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer

Regards Bernard.
DeliciousLancashireHotpot (2024-09-12 21:44:36+00:00): Hi Bernard,

Thank you for the explanation. I just wanted the .apologies to be able to show the segregated cycleway, but clearly do not know enough to contribute, really sorry. Very happy for you to revert as I'm clearly getting it wrong. 

Thanks for your help. 

David
BCNorwich (2024-09-13 07:03:10+00:00): Hello David,
I've reverted the changeset so all is now well with routing, there are no duplicated highways.

As for the query about segregated cycleway.  Regarding Way: Sheffield Road (449060625) which has the tag cycleway:both=track, (and any similarly tagged highway), the tag sidewalk=both could be added. This would then indicate that the road has a separated cycleway track and a seperated/segregated sidewalk on both sides. The tags can be adjusted (left, right, both) to suit the circumstances, the road would need to be section up to allow for any changes in sidewalk or cycleway.  Please see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cycleway%3Dtrack  and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sidewalk  for more details.

I don't have local knowledge so can't attempt such changes. If you want to have a go keep in touch via email by clicking on BCNorwich above.

Regards Bernard.
VLD287 (2024-10-09 22:21:38+00:00): Hello Jamie, 
I noticed a few buildings have what seem to be personal names.  If these are the names of the home owners then they should not be added to the map according to OSM privacy standards: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Limitations_on_mapping_private_information. Could you let me know if that is the case here?
Best regards, 
VLD287.
wolfyjade (2024-09-09 18:17:42+00:00): I updated the opening hours based on the sad realization that it was closed today (on Monday).
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2024-09-09 19:42:33+00:00): Hi, the 100 speed limit is probably the summer time one, right?

OpenStreetMap is not about changing values back-and-forth. Many applications also work offline.

I'd recommend adding the summer speed limit as a separate tag like
maxspeed:conditional=110 @ (Apr 1-Oct 31)
and having the usual maxspeed as
maxspeed=90

I don't know what the dates should be exactly, but they should be taken conservatively. Better to show lower speed limit than a higher one.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2024-09-09 19:56:14+00:00): actually, the conditional one is already there. I've changed maxspeed back to 90
CuriousFlashlight (2024-09-09 17:45:37+00:00): https://web2.cylex.de/firma-home/sauna-lahntal-5555887.html
NorthCrab_upload (2024-09-09 17:50:57+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12165996296

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
◪ Jarv (2024-09-13 00:30:31+00:00): Hi Mike, is this new road fully open to the public yet, or are parts of it under construction?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156407546
MikeC-W (2024-09-13 07:42:36+00:00): It's not fully open, the middle section is under construction but I live half way down it and that bit is open. I'll mark the closed bits.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156407546
wolfyjade (2024-09-09 18:16:43+00:00): I updated the opening hours based on what's on the door of this restaurant, and I added the vegetarian tag based on the fact that they have a falafel kebab option and noted that it's vegetarian (not vegan because I assume the garlic sauce contains regular old yoghurt).
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-08 03:26:57+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164658807
felipeeugenio (2024-09-10 12:06:42+00:00): Buena edición.
Si las calles interiores tienen accesso restringido, agregar a éstas access=private o permissive según sea el caso.
Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156408020
mtmail (2024-09-11 14:22:28+00:00): There is a "Fiets = voorband" on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12166078658 I wanted to translate that to English but won't understand what it means on the map
Peter Elderson (2024-09-11 14:38:20+00:00): Haha, that's an error! It means bicycle=front_tube, and was meant for my personal todo-list! Thanks for reporting the error.
mtmail (2024-09-11 14:40:50+00:00): Mistakes like this make looking through long lists of "this tag has never been used before" fun :)
SomeoneElse (2025-07-04 18:37:50+00:00): Hello,
You've added a name:sg to https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/osm-deep-history/#/node/3950817291 - is that correct (Sango - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ISO_639_language_codes ) or should it actually be gd (Scottish Gaelic)?
Best Regards,
Andy
UNGSC-DTLM-Ale_Zena (2024-10-02 07:23:57+00:00): Hello Isaac,
I suggest to check the result after the upload when you work in data dense environment: you left, at least, a broken boundary.

Cheers,
  Alessandro
VLD280 (2024-10-02 15:32:26+00:00): Hello Alessandro,

Thank you for your feedback regarding my edits on this relation. I appreciate you bringing this to my attention and thank you for addressing the issue. I will take your advice into consideration and will make sure to be more vigilant when making these types of edits moving forward. 

Best regards, 
Isaac (VLD280)
silversurfer83 (2024-09-17 19:19:08+00:00): Hi there :)

just that you added the name of the stadium to the pitch itself without giving a proper reason.

I'd like to ask why you did that since the name is already tagged to the statdium multipolygon itself. 

Also, I'd very much like you to please add proper comments to your changes since your double digit numbers don't really help anyone.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

happy mapping
silversurfer83
eggie (2024-09-09 19:38:27+00:00): Dag Paaj  Is dit werkelijk een wandelpad.  Waarom maxspeed 15 op een wandelpad?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-09-09 19:45:43+00:00): Ik heb maxspeed 15 verwijderd.
eggie (2024-09-09 19:51:58+00:00): De wegen en paden heb ik wat uitgelijnd mbv de BGT transparant. Daar staan de ingemeten wegen in.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-09-09 20:03:36+00:00): Wellicht heb je wat aan de laatste sat foto van 6 sept
https://viewer.satellietdataportaal.nl/@52.05650,4.525520,18/?datastrip=20240906_PNEO-04
Paaj (2024-09-09 21:04:13+00:00): Ontzettend bedankt Eggie,
De maxspeed 15 kwam mee uit de template, deze had ik moeten verwijderen, dankjewel daarvoor.
Die satelliet beelden had ik nog niet gezien, dank daarvoor!
Gr's,
Paaj
pantufla (2024-09-19 19:57:58+00:00): Hola, has añadido mucho verde que realmente no es tan así