piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Adam Franco (2023-11-26 20:15:03+00:00): This invalid place-level retagging has been reverted. See community discussion at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/new-england-place-name-inflation/103878/21

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144484375
Adam Franco (2023-11-26 20:15:04+00:00): This invalid place-level retagging has been reverted. See community discussion at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/new-england-place-name-inflation/103878/21

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144484375
adrianojbr (2023-05-19 22:25:00+00:00): Olá, VLD512!

Favor ver o comentário do changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136264616.

Abraço!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136310017
cbeddow (2023-05-22 15:22:21+00:00): If you use https://rapideditor.org you can get suggested buildings to add to the map also?
Glassman (2023-05-20 23:33:37+00:00): It appears you have added a parking lot inside of an existing parking lot. I removed the old one since yours seem to have better boundaries. Just be careful when adding objects not to duplicate features.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136310221
martinst (2024-02-09 09:10:20+00:00): Richtigen Wegverlauf eingetragen:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147209932
eggie (2023-05-19 18:14:16+00:00): Dag mrmiddel..  Je had de trap geplakt op het bestaande pad. Dat werkt niet. We noemen dat duplicated ways.
Ik heb het pad onder de trap verwijderd.
Dit waren je edits ... Daar kun je dat zien.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=136310801

MVG
eggie
mrmiddel (2023-05-19 18:18:56+00:00): eggie, dankjewel! Zal die fout niet nog een keer maken.
eggie (2023-05-19 18:34:19+00:00): In het begin is alles rijstebrij... Gaat vanzelf over.
Mapse
eggie
arcanma (2023-05-22 15:43:16+00:00): Alve Roberta, benvenuta in OpenStreetMap, grazie per il tuo primo contributo.
Ho visto che molto probabilmente senza rendertene conto avevi "deviato" via Bach e via Grioli trascinando 2 nodi fuori dal percorso delle rispettive vie, ho ripristinato il tracciato corretto.
Anche sulle fermate degli autobus ho tolto l'etichetta bus=yes, l'editor la propone ma secondo le linee guida attuali (vedi https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:public_transport) si mette solo sulla strada, non dove le persone aspettano l'autobus. Per il resto tutto molto bene
arcanma (2023-05-22 15:43:51+00:00): *Salve*, mi era sfuggita la S
NorthCrab_upload (2023-05-19 18:20:13+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6312999127
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6595206950
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3751986500
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/460382499
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/663624644
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/374677420
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/460382477
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/464855933

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
ivanbranco (2023-05-23 10:05:56+00:00): Hi vislupus,

https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/9828267026

the value was correct before, please read: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikimedia_commons#Common_tagging_mistakes
emersonveenstra (2023-05-22 11:00:26+00:00): Hi,

You updated the number of lanes, but did not update the "turn:lanes" tag to only have one value. Can you please do that? Thanks!
JuanjoMC (2023-05-20 14:04:55+00:00): Hi,

You putted a reddit url as the acces tag value.

I guess that you meant acces=private, right?
Steffen Triekels (2023-05-20 14:45:45+00:00): Not sure how that happened, had some issues saving. Yes should be private.
Steffen Triekels (2023-05-20 17:54:40+00:00): I pushed a fix
Glassman (2023-05-20 23:36:15+00:00): #TIP: just because MS created the building outline doesn't mean they are good. In this case the building outline should be squared. You can square the building by selecting the outline then just type a "q"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136312060
InsertUser (2023-05-19 21:21:45+00:00): Hello, I think the `highway=rest_area` you have added in Czechia are probably something else are that tag is for vehicles to stop, and  the new ones seem to be near paths. What do these look like?
GOwin (2023-05-20 00:46:00+00:00): There's no need to add this because the feature is already mapped.

Look a few meters down south, and you'll see that it's been mapped in detail: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/120426236
eggie (2023-05-19 20:20:25+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback   Waar komt die maxspeed 20 vandaan. Staan hier werkelijk borden?

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
xiqum (2023-05-19 20:33:48+00:00): Boddemate is een woonerf, maximaal 15km/h. Gecorrigeerd in wijziging 136315798
eggie (2023-05-19 20:41:26+00:00): Oei...  Dan zitten we elkaar wellicht in de weg, want ik paste net wat aan.. Zal even checken.

Maar woonerf is met 15 km/h inderdaad correct. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-05-19 20:42:52+00:00): Ik heb hier vier residentials omgetagd naar woonerf, maar wellicht zijn er veel meer in de wijk.. Up to you.
Veel plezier met mappen.
eggie
L'imaginaire (2023-05-19 18:51:18+00:00): I meant: adding bicycle pump
Glassman (2023-05-20 23:37:49+00:00): The residential street you added looks more like a highway=service + service=driveway. Can you review this edit?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136312757
eggie (2023-05-19 20:27:28+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback  Lijkt me helemaal oke.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Glenn86 (2023-05-21 10:28:39+00:00): Gezien, dankjewel :)
Glassman (2023-05-20 23:42:06+00:00): The service road north of Saint Monica School still is there on the latest imagery. Was it removed in error? Can you review this edit? 

Also - the highway=residential added appears to be just a highway=service + service=driveway.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136312874
Kincannon (2023-05-19 19:09:47+00:00): I would like someone to review my edits
eggie (2023-05-19 20:31:04+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback Minicamping Looierheide is al getagd op het vlak en staat dus al op de kaart. Dan zal een extra bijdrage met camping en caravan_site niet nodig zijn. 



MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-05-19 20:32:32+00:00): De camping staat al de kaart. Ik zal je bijdrage verwijderen.
MVG
eggie
MartinSNV (2023-05-19 19:29:30+00:00): Doplnenie adries z RA
NorthCrab_upload (2023-05-19 19:30:18+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1174380299

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
MoiraPrime (2023-07-02 03:59:47+00:00): If you're interested in that construction project you added, I found the project page for it. They're going to continue it to meet up at that curve in LA 434, then have it continue to I-12. http://wwwapps.dotd.la.gov/administration/public_info/projects/home.aspx?key=88
thompsondt (2024-08-01 01:31:31+00:00): taking a look Bradley's corner.. It appears the aerial images are behind the ground truth by about two years. The crosswalk exists where you marked it, rather than where the aerials are showing it.

Good edit.
Glassman (2023-05-20 23:45:33+00:00): It looks like you accidentally dragged a node from S Washington Street to past East Yesler Way. I've fixed it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136314409
Jordi MF (2023-05-22 18:58:05+00:00): Hola MikelCalo,
Veo que sigues mapeando las desembocaduras de algunas calles que contactan con otras como si tuviesen un giro al final de las mismas y en todos los casos no es así (como ya comenté en otro changeset). También mapeas los giros antes de hora y eso conllevará que los ruteadores dejen de informar del posible giro antes de llegar a la intersección. Hay que mapear el contacto entre calles en el último punto en el que es posible el giro.

Por otra parte, deberías indicar en los changeset qué has mapeado. Tus ediciones son muy grandes y añdiendo "cv" es imposible saber qué has editado. Después de 1000 ediciones, sería bueno mejorar ese aspecto para facilitar que los demás editores entiendan qué has querido editar en cada changeset.

Saludos,
Jordi
gscholz (2023-05-21 06:26:50+00:00): Hi martin_ferrari85,
your recent activities again have left behind errors in the OSmMdatabase regarding self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-58.57732&lat=-26.06083&zoom=10&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2023-05-25 05:31:42+00:00): Hi martin_ferrari85, 
due to your missing feedback, I have reverted this changeset to fix those issues.
Guido
Glassman (2023-05-20 23:49:28+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

You forgot to added tags to the way. I've added driveway tags to the way.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136314498
Glassman (2023-05-20 23:50:29+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.
The building outline doesn't match the imagery. Please review and fix. Let me know if you need assistance.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136314552
Glassman (2023-05-20 23:51:26+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

Again the building outline doesn't match the aerial imagery. Please update.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136314598
luisforte (2023-05-19 22:00:26+00:00): Hi!
I am commenting this changeset for three different reasons:
- The "name" tag is written in the native language, with the exceptions of eg trademarks. The name used here with the "name" tag should be the "name:en" tag, and the "name" should be written in Portuguese.
- The name used here is a description, not a name. The name may be an official, regional or popular name, etc., but a description is not used as a name.
- This last topic, probably less assertive than the previous ones: I'm not aware of any official or unofficial reference to the point you added. It is a fact that it is clearly as far west as possible but it is nothing more than a personal observation subject to adjustments in position and name, according to the personal criteria of other users, even more so because this point is located on a rock beyond the coastline .
Cabo da Roca is undoubtedly the westernmost point of Portugal and Europe, and its Lighthouse is usually considered the best known reference, or even better a memorial present there, even closer to the coastline.
I think it's worth rethinking the existence of this point, but any information that supports the existence of this node is welcome!
Luís
Glassman (2023-05-20 23:51:51+00:00): #TIP: square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136314703
Glassman (2023-05-20 23:52:40+00:00): This is most likely a service road. Can you review this edit?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136314803
trigpoint (2023-05-20 09:43:18+00:00): Hi
Just wondering what source you used for this edit? Did you actually visit the location?

Cheers Phil
BradleySans (2023-05-20 09:51:19+00:00): I didn't visit, however I recognise the name of the shop as it's one branch of a chain, therefore I was able to change the tag from shop=yes to the more specific value of a casino. Is this not accurate? Is there a different value used for this sort of place?

Thanks
BradleySans (2023-05-20 09:57:13+00:00): Checking the wiki, it seems that leisure=adult_gaming_centre is more accurate for this sort of small place. I'll change it to that. 


Sorry, and thanks for pointing out my mistake,
Bradley
trigpoint (2023-05-20 11:22:54+00:00): Or it could be leisure=amusement_arcade, but this needs a survey.

After 8 years are you sure it even still exists? Or has the same name?

Armchairing away problems such as shop=yes only makes it harder for local mappers to find and correctly update these problems. 

Cheers Phil
MarkusHD (2023-06-22 18:35:13+00:00): Du hast hier "Piston Centro" eingetragen, ist doch aber "Pistons Centro" laut der Info und deinen eigenen Bildern aus https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3121601
george1201 (2023-06-22 21:22:47+00:00): Oh, peinlich. Da ist mir wohl ein s verloren gegangen. Vielen Dank für die aufmerksame Prüfung. Hab's korrigiert.
marc__marc (2024-09-11 10:04:28+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1174418053
que veux tu dire ? c'est du gravier ou de la terre ?
survey_date sert quand on veux mémoriser la dernière fois que le revetement a été vérifié sur le terrain
Cordialement,
Marc
PtChav (2024-09-11 10:17:03+00:00): Bonjour,
Entre les deux : du gravier collant avec des marnes. Du "tout-venant" local.
Merci,
eggie (2023-05-19 20:45:59+00:00): Dit waren je edits hier,
maar de rest van je uploads zijn niet doorgekomen denk ik omdat ik net wat aan het wijzigen was. 
Maar het lijkt me allemaal nu correct zo.
eggie
eggie (2023-05-19 22:03:16+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback  Hier loopt het Hanzestedenpad en de NS-Wandeling IJsselvallei . Die zijn nu onderbroken en zullen dus omgelegd moeten worden. Dat gaat overigens niet met editor iD.

Zal straks of anders moren even kijken.


MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-05-19 22:08:13+00:00): De wandelroutes heb ik omgeleid via de Weerdseweg.
Groet
eggie
Gert Arnold (2023-05-21 13:52:07+00:00): Top! Dit is inderdaad hoe wij ook maar gelopen zijn.
woodpeck (2023-06-06 15:22:55+00:00): Is there any indication that your "Southernmost continental point of Eurasia" is indeed a "tourist attraction"? Is there any signage on the ground? It appears to me that you have imported a lot of "extreme points" from Wikidata just based on the fact that they are "extreme points". It is easy to use OSM to compute the extreme points of each country but will we add all of them to OSM as "tourist attractions"?
NieWnen (2023-05-20 09:29:03+00:00): To nie jest building_passage. Tu nie ma przejścia na wylot budynku, a zejście do podziemi.
Makifr (2023-05-20 10:07:37+00:00): poprawiłem
hvalentim (2023-05-20 15:34:55+00:00): Tem a certeza que as Ortos 2018 lhe permitem traçar a localização da piscina com maior exatidão que as Ortos Litoral 2014-5 (com muito melhor resolução) ou que as Ortos 2004-6 (regra geral melhor alinhadas)? Repare que do ponto de vista da verticalidade sobre o local as últimas são ambas bastante melhores. Comparou?
renosmo (2023-05-20 20:20:08+00:00): Olá. Eu não estou a usar qualquer tipo de mapa comparativo. Eu simplesmente uso o editor do navegador de Internet. E, neste último, a piscina aparecia significativamente desalinhada com o que se via na fotografia de satélite, ao ponto de me fazer querer corrigi-lo. Tendo eu corrigido o que via, o resultado que agora vejo no navegador de Internet, é o seguinte - https://postimg.cc/bS9Xt6qL - e, se quiser você voltar a alinhar a piscina do modo como estava anteriormente, pode depois ver como ela aparece desalinhada com a fotografia de satélite, no editor do navegador de Internet. Se forem as fotografias de satélite que estão erradas... então isso põe em causa todo o processo de edição, em si. Mas, de qualquer modo, se quiser pode voltar a pôr como estava. (A piscina não é, para mim, algo de importante. E, eu já deverei ter terminado as minhas edições nesta cidade.)
renosmo (2023-05-20 20:35:53+00:00): Também, a razão pela qual eu editei a piscina uma segunda vez, foi porque, da primeira vez que o fiz, tive problemas em conseguir gravar os resultados (aparecia-me repetidamente uma mensagem de erro, por causa de muitas ligações ao servidor do OSM, que dizia que os resultados tinham sido gravados apenas "localmente", sem explicar o que queria isto dizer. E, por isso e por ter eu constatado depois que o alinhamento estava como dantes, pensei que não tivesse eu conseguido fazer a alteração que queria (i.e. que não tivesse eu conseguido gravar a mesma) apesar desta constar do meu histórico de alterações. E, foi por isso é que editei uma segunda vez. Se o que aconteceu, foi que você tinha entretanto alterado para ficar como dantes, peço desculpa, pois não sabia disso. Não é minha vontade andar em "guerras" de alterações. E, teria eu então debatido o assunto antes de prosseguir.
renosmo (2023-05-20 21:05:19+00:00): Ah... Espere. Acho que já sei o que se passa. Os mapas que você está a referir devem fazer o alinhamento consoante o *fundo* da piscina - e não a superfície da mesma. Devia ser por isso é que a piscina não aparecia alinhada com a fotografia de satélite. Pois, tal como se pode ver nos edifícios circundantes, a fotografia mostra uma vista de *perspectiva inclinada*. Não há aqui qualquer erro, seja das fotografias de satélite ou de qualquer pessoa que editou a piscina. É tudo uma questão de *critério* usado (i.e. se se deve assinalar o fundo da piscina, ou a superfície da mesma). Pode editar à vontade, se quiser. Penso que, qualquer um dos critérios usado é válido. E, fico então mais descansado quanto a poder confiar nas fotografias de satélite (ou em todo o processo de edição, em si, como eu tinha dito).
renosmo (2023-05-20 21:13:18+00:00): Resumindo: o que se passou, foi algo causado pelo facto do editor do navegador de Internet mostrar fotografias de satélite, em que são vistos os edifícios de lado - o que, pelos vistos, pode levar a enganos; certamente que, os mapas que você refere serão muito mais correctos - e, por isso, deverão sobrepor-se (em termos de validade) às edições feitas no navegador de Internet.
hvalentim (2023-05-21 07:33:26+00:00): O ID (editor padrão nos navegadores) mostra por predefinição as Ortos 2018 (boa fonte 'all around'), mas também o deixa escolher outras fontes como "imagens de fundo" (atalho tecla B e ícone com imagem de "camadas").  Por outro lado, como contribuidor regular pode achar conveniente experimentar o JOSM: https://josm.openstreetmap.de
Não havendo imagens aéreas perfeitas, pessoalmente tenho sempre por conveniente comparar mais de um fonte. 
No JOSM é ainda possível ajustar uma camada ad hoc (por exemplo se a fonte é mais recente ou a imagem tem mais qualidade mas claramente está ligeiramente desviada, é possível realinhá-la  - por ex. usando os survey_points, se os houver por perto):
https://learnosm.org/en/josm/correcting-imagery-offset/
hvalentim (2023-05-21 07:46:16+00:00): 'No pun intended'. Mas ainda me recordo de quando iD mostrava por por definição imagens Bing que na zona da Trafaria chegavam a ter 30 metros de offset e de vez em quando, recorrentemene, lá vinha alguém repor as estradas pelo Bing... Por conseguinte, só lhe queria chamar a atenção não só para a possibilidade como a conveniência, como método, de triangular/comparar fontes.
renosmo (2023-05-21 17:56:37+00:00): OK. Obrigado pelas dicas. Eu não sou um contribuidor propriamente regular (apenas, andava com uma obsessão em deixar a Costa da Caparica, em particular, bem mapeada) - mas, das próximas vezes (que deverão, de qualquer modo, surgir) em que queira eu voltar a editar algo, terei em conta essas opções de edição de que me falou.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-05-22 20:15:43+00:00): Nice!
Maybe one tag you'd like to also use here is amenity=traffic_park
b-unicycling (2023-05-23 08:35:25+00:00): I did: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1174429391
I was actually only trying to find the milk churn stand I had spotted on a Flickr image, but the mapillary didn't reach there. I think it might be closer to the building labelled "Puukooli".
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dmilk_churn_stand
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-05-23 18:48:47+00:00): Sorry, I've just noticed description on the path and thought that you didn't know how to tag it. Description kind of confused me since it could also be sport=rc_car.

There is a chance I'll visit this place at the end of the summer, will try not to forget about looking for milk churn stand :D
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-05-23 18:52:38+00:00): BTW, you can also try to locate it with this service https://fotoladu.maaamet.ee/?basemap=hybriidk&zlevel=14,26.91276,58.01545&overlay=tyhi

Images from 2022 are quite detailed if you know what and where exactly to look for
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-05-23 18:53:38+00:00): click on the map for angled photos
b-unicycling (2023-05-23 19:06:57+00:00): got it, thanks!
ALu68 (2023-05-20 07:52:42+00:00): Hallo Fynn Vis,

Willkommen bei OSM.

Bevor du große Änderungen an den Daten vornimmst, solltest du "Good practice" im wiki lesen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice

Du hast dieses Objekt z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/88596811/history von building=yes auf place=plot inklusive der Dimensionen geändert.

Deshalb werde ich diesen Änderungssatz komplett umkehren, auch wenn dadurch einige "Punkte" nochmals korrigiert werden müssen.

Gruß. Andre
Ze0zohk1 (2023-10-03 18:58:51+00:00): are you sure this way (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1174447035) is part of the E6 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1254350) ?
dododont (2023-10-03 20:29:51+00:00): IIRC, this path definitely had the Pirkan Taival/E6 sign starting from the  Hongontie. We didn't follow the path, so I just marked the beginning of the path. I'm not sure what the actual route of the Pirkan Taival is here.
Ze0zohk1 (2023-10-04 15:16:55+00:00): Alright. But can you please add the way to the correct relation? Thanks, Peter
dododont (2023-10-04 17:23:35+00:00): I can't help with that. Please feel free to correct. Pirkan Taival is somewhat forgotten at the moment and it seems that Finland has also opted out from supporting the European long distance paths.
Eino81 (2023-09-26 07:15:38+00:00): Hi Lukas, just out of curiosity, are those paths there open for public? Can I go into that area? Anytime? Or is that closed, or open only for customers?...
Lukáš Jelínek (2023-09-26 07:27:00+00:00): Hi, I've mapped those paths according to aerial imageries and a cadastral map. Thus I haven't exact information about their accessibility. But I guess that the ones that are inside the farm are accessible only for customers (or only private) and the other ones are publicly open.