piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2025-10-22 13:10:14+00:00): Merhaba. Yaklaşık 2 haftadır cevap yazmadığınız için değişikliğinizi geri aldım. Lütfen gerçeğe aykırı değişiklikler yapmayınız.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173627251
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-05 20:12:05+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11737225047
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1435735537

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Dawid2849 (2025-10-07 11:38:59+00:00): Cześć. Upraszczając tę relację usunąłeś możliwość skrętu z ul. Sybiraków w ul. Mikołowską: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19681766
gscscnd (2025-10-07 11:43:31+00:00): Dzięki za sprawdzenie, poprawię.
Dawid2849 (2025-10-10 17:25:11+00:00): Dzięki za błyskawiczną poprawę :)
LordGarySugar (2025-10-13 18:23:45+00:00): Hi, I've removed amenity=pub from the Hoops Inn as it's still being refurbished, the tag should only be re-added once it officially reopens. The website says this will be in early 2026.
silversurfer83 (2025-10-05 21:58:47+00:00): Hi :)

guck dir für das GKM mal https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:building:part an. Vielleicht lässt sich damit besser arbeiten, da es aktuell erstmal komisch aussieht.

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172883727
SG86 (2025-10-08 21:29:20+00:00): Hallo,
danke für den Tipp.
Das Kraftwerk siegt tatsächlich noch komisch aus. Es ist aber auch schwierig es richtig abzubilden
Baloo Uriza (2026-03-23 15:49:37+00:00): Hey, wait a minute, this wasn't built in the 1990s on a military base!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172883738
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-05 20:12:08+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1032081901

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
confusedbuffalo (2025-10-06 17:38:55+00:00): Hi, it looks like you're doing a great job updating the area around here.

Just a quick note about phone numbers though, for compatibility, it's recommended to use international format, so replace the leading 0 with +44

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone for more on this

I've fixed any I've found, including these recent ones here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172926617
silversurfer83 (2025-10-05 20:50:50+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap :)

thank you for helping us keeping the database up to date.

You asked for someone to review your edit. These reviews are, like most work at OSM, volunteer jobs. You got lucky ;)

Your changes look alright to me.

You missed one crucial detail though: Go into edit mode and select one of the highways you edited to check the "allowed access" tag. If these ways are free to general traffic you can click the "trash can" button next to it to reset the values to default which allows for default routing to commence.
If there are restrictions, set them per mode of transport.

if there are any questions at all, please reach out.

happy mapping :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172884434
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-05 20:21:32+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1032081901

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
YomanNH (2025-10-20 08:46:24+00:00): Usunąłem fikcję, nie ma takiego przystanku.
YomanNH (2025-10-20 08:46:54+00:00): "survey" w source jest kłamstwem.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-05 20:31:12+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1032081901

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Glassman (2025-10-06 21:17:43+00:00): The road appears on the newest imagery, ESRI World, If the service road still exists, it would be better to add the tag access=no. That will keep people from adding it from imagery.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172884837
YomanNH (2025-10-06 11:49:50+00:00): Zatoki autobusowe są jakoś oddzielone od głównej drogi, że zmapowałeś je jako dodatkowe jezdnie?
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-05 20:40:52+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1032081901

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
sefabaris (2025-11-03 12:42:33+00:00): Verinin kaynağı nedir?
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-05 20:51:01+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1032081901

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
K12230LF (2026-07-15 10:29:50+00:00): Hello, par rapport à https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13196542721/history , il y avait déjà https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8922574918/history d'indiqué. 
Tu en avais vu un 2e ?
Yod4z (2026-07-15 10:54:06+00:00): Oups! Effectivement je n'ai pas du le voir lors de ma modification.
Je corrigé ça dessuite.
campbelltree (2025-10-05 22:18:20+00:00): Looks good to me!
NeisBot (2025-10-05 21:36:50+00:00): Olá Pedro0135, bem-vindo e obrigado pela sua contribuição!

Para tornar a colaboração mais fácil e ajudar os outros a entender as suas edições, é melhor adicionar uma breve descrição das alterações que fez. Comentários claros ajudam a comunidade a seguir o seu trabalho e fornecer feedback melhor. Você pode encontrar dicas sobre como escrever bons comentários aqui[1].

Com base nas suas edições de mapa neste conjunto de alterações, eu preparei uma sugestão do que um comentário poderia parecer: "Atualizou atributos de rodovias, incluindo residenciais, não classificados, construção, mão única, detalhes da superfície, adicionou nome Rua José Senedese, removeu detalhes do estádio"
(Auto-translation)
---
Hi Pedro0135, welcome and thanks for your contribution!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

Based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Updated highway attributes, including residential, unclassified, construction, oneway, surface details, added name Rua José Senedese, removed stadium details"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
user_5359 (2025-10-07 16:00:03+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1435767414 (one of 6,787 objetcs). What is the meaning of the tags
OBJECTID = 190795
classid = 409bdbfe-28f3-4670-80b2-f8ce7c6d7a2a
edifc_at = -9999.0
edifc_mon = 02
edifc_nome = UNK
edifc_sot = 01
edifc_stat = 02
edifc_ty = 01
edifc_uso = 01
meta_ist = 04
scril = 5k
shape_Area = 118.91476407248302
shape_Leng = 48.23541582439104
(no other OSM keys).
From the comment, I gather you mean building=yes?
DaDiC_88 (2025-10-08 07:21:23+00:00): Hi, sorry I'm working to solve this, the upload from josm didn't get the modification I've done, Yes, I've uploaded every building missing from  this municipality
user_5359 (2025-10-08 07:27:51+00:00): Did you need any help?
DaDiC_88 (2025-10-08 08:02:53+00:00): Oh thanks very kind, but I've made the mistake, I wouldn't burden you.
ivanbranco (2025-10-31 14:46:45+00:00): In generale ricordati solo che per importare dati è necessario seguire delle linee guida: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Import/Guidelines
LateNightTone (2025-12-11 14:00:40+00:00): Thanks for your edit. I've removed node [13196614634](https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13196614634) (Stena Line ferry terminal) because this is double mapping: the terminal building already had these tags.
VictorIE (2026-05-17 11:04:11+00:00): Hi,

UPS Church Lane / Ann Street.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13196614638/

Might this be better mapped as:
amenity=parcel_locker or amenity=post_office or amenity=post_depot ?
LateNightTone (2026-05-18 16:07:44+00:00): Actually amenity=parcel_locker is for physical unmanned lockers. Accepted tagging practice is to add post_office:parcel_pickup to the shop in question, which is the vape shop. So I've updated accordingly and removed the postbox node. Thanks for mapping though kevinmcg, and thanks victorIE for pointing out the tag error.
ilias_ (2025-10-06 10:25:24+00:00): De quelle route tu parles???
Hdidanox (2025-10-06 14:40:03+00:00): Vérifier dans Google maps svp
Hdidanox (2025-10-06 14:40:23+00:00): Je suis sûre de ma réclamation
Hdidanox (2025-10-06 14:41:15+00:00): Une petite route a côté de aria sport
tastrax (2025-10-06 08:57:20+00:00): Mmmmmm - I dont think we have permission to use the imagery from Devonport Council. If you know the licence or have contacts in council we may be able to get the required permission. The site doesnt actually specify a licence but it looks to be copyright.

We do have permission to use the LIST tiles for addressing etc.

Cheers - Phil
Powered-Technical (2025-10-06 09:26:57+00:00): I discovered the backend by discovering sources on an ArcGIS experience on the website. There is a contact for another endpoint I found; it is useful because it is up-to-date. The other imagery is missing and has a zoom level 23 (~1cm). It's worth contacting them; you're right, @tastrax, thanks for contacting them for me. There is a cautionary sign with metadata. Export Tiles Allowed: false
Max Export Tiles Count: 100000 "it prevents bulk downloading."

Kind Regards, Powered-Technical a new user
Powered-Technical (2025-10-06 09:41:59+00:00): Guess who voliated terms of service whoops, it is meant to be open for the public it seems like.
Original experience Devonport City Council Public. Data Map https://experience.arcgis.com/experience/00452854f7b94318b8fcf68f40782946

This map / data is made available for the purpose of providing access to Devonport City Council information and not as professional advice. The information contained on the map is diagrammatic only. All information should be verified on site, or with the appropriate State Government Department or Council Office, prior to being used for any purpose
tastrax (2025-10-06 10:08:11+00:00): Copyright © Devonport City Council 2024. Thebounds of the data also correspond to the LIST Imagery for which we dont have a waiver as its licence is CC BY 3.0 BY NC ND (and there is no way we will get it for OSM). Did you use the imagery to edit building outlines? Thats an issue - addresses is not as we have access to LIST for addresses.
tastrax (2025-10-06 10:12:33+00:00): These are the sources we have access to - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Data_Sources#Tasmania
Powered-Technical (2025-10-06 10:15:34+00:00): Not for this selection, applicable to other edits.
Powered-Technical (2025-10-08 08:28:08+00:00): I will utilise https://revert.monicz.dev/ to revert the offending change sets. So, all should be good.
MassCartog (2025-10-06 03:49:38+00:00): Hi welcome to OSM. Please take the time to tell people what you are doing. Please read this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Also i've made this mistake too, but the roads you removed do seem to exist on the ground. The user that mapped them is using sentinel2 imagery that brand new, the imagery is OSM is older and not showing these roads yet.

See for yourself.
https://sentinel2explorer.esri.com/

Type "33.48264, -95.28168" into the seach box.

Let me know if you need help fixing these changesets.
MassCartog (2025-10-06 03:49:43+00:00): Hi welcome to OSM. Please take the time to tell people what you are doing. Please read this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Also i've made this mistake too, but the roads you removed do seem to exist on the ground. The user that mapped them is using sentinel2 imagery that brand new, the imagery is OSM is older and not showing these roads yet.

See for yourself.
https://sentinel2explorer.esri.com/

Type "33.48264, -95.28168" into the seach box.

Let me know if you need help fixing these changesets.
NeisBot (2025-10-05 23:15:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-10-12 05:17:58+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/173163454
Paul Fisher (2025-10-08 04:18:13+00:00): the thing i’m unsure about on this is the exact labelling of the roundabout. I’ve tagged it as if the routes continue through the circle; should they end on either side?
ilias_ (2025-10-06 10:24:27+00:00): Ce n'est pas un driveway
NeisBot (2025-10-05 23:33:40+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-10-12 05:17:22+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/173163448
rskedgell (2025-10-07 07:28:57+00:00): Please could you explain why you deleted the short footway link (w172888893) between Savage Gardens and the footway in Beckton Park?

Connecting it only to a short section of decorative sidewalk, which is not itself connected to any other highway made that entrance to the park unreachable for pedestrian navigation.

Link undeleted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172944855
dsmith10 (2025-10-07 07:45:25+00:00): I added the sidewalks on both sides of savage garden and then connected that footpath to the sidewalk - not meaning to disrupt any pedestrian navigation. I was working within a block so did not think about about how that would make the park inaccessible.
VictorIE (2026-03-17 21:27:29+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/612672784/

"name=Historic Winch" seems like an odd name for a commercial area.
NeisBot (2025-10-06 00:16:35+00:00): Hi Curt71, welcome and thanks for your contribution!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

Based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Added buildings"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
ilias_ (2025-10-06 10:23:35+00:00): Khouya, highway=primary ghir dyal les routes nationales, hadik rah machi route nationale, khelliha residential
kenken234 (2025-10-06 12:51:43+00:00): is it open yet? i rmb seeing a notice that the junction will fully open by end Oct
SS_L (2025-10-06 13:30:31+00:00): I am from LTA, the junction will be open prior to the implementation of the new svc 104 on 26/10/25. I need to download the road with the changes made for testing and routing purposes, kindly do not change back.
SwiftElm02 (2025-10-08 09:36:58+00:00): Hi, I noticed you changed Silverstone Circuit from highway=raceway to highway=secondary. Could you explain why? As it’s a closed race circuit, raceway seems more appropriate
willkmis (2025-10-06 13:46:57+00:00): Hey there! Please note that place=district is a specific administrative division in some countries: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place=district?uselang=en. The tag is basically unused in the US: https://taginfo.geofabrik.de/north-america:us/tags/place=district#overview.

place= tagging is a little counterintuitive to Americans since the names come from British English: the urban hierarchy within cities goes 'suburb' > 'quarter' > 'neighbourhood' (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:place#Populated_settlements,_urban). So since place=neighbourhood is the smallest possible urban place, it's OK for it to be within, say, Capitol Hill (a place=suburb https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/158502198). Neighborhoods also don't have to be official to be mapped, they just have to be a name for an area known to locals. So I would be in favor of switching Lincoln Park back to place=neighbourhood.

Happy mapping!
Will
Dissident93 (2025-10-06 22:40:57+00:00): Thanks for the suggestions, I've gone ahead and made it a neighborhood again.
user_5359 (2025-10-07 13:22:58+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1435797024 . What is the mean of the tags
buildRecordTypeValue = Здание
categoryName = Здания
descr = Хозяйственное строение
extracted_place_type = деревня
levels = 1 (duplicate to building:levels?)
materials = Каменные
ownershipType = Частная
purpose = Нежилое
year_built = 2017 (duplicate to start_date?)
kosmgeolan (2025-10-09 01:53:38+00:00): Hello. I looked at your link. I don't see any problem with the tags now. They probably fixed it after I edited it.
user_5359 (2025-10-09 05:46:04+00:00): Modified by Jakob48!
Your version (no 1) https://www.osm.org/way/1435797024/history/1
actual version (no 2)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1435797024/history/2
Please use the documented keys and values.
kosmgeolan (2025-10-09 06:13:50+00:00): ok. Not all modules are working for me today((.thanks for the corrections
user_5359 (2025-10-06 05:09:02+00:00): Unfortunately, I had to revert your first attempt at ALPR monitoring because the entry didn't make sense. I found an example that might serve as a good template: https://www.osm.org/node/13160901909.
TrickyFoxy (2025-10-11 21:27:22+00:00): 👋 Обратите внимание, что вы рисуете по старым снимкам Bing. Используйте более свежие снимки ESRI
ion_chi (2025-10-20 16:47:36+00:00): This street is bidirection for bikes, i.e oneway:bicycle=no, so it was tagged correctly before. Reverted here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173547095
Partizanin (2025-10-08 17:33:22+00:00): Какая русификация, местный язык тут русский, говорят все на русском, и все названия были правильными
user_21736114 (2025-10-15 03:51:01+00:00): В этом проекте Донбасс есть Украина поетому для улиц  и еще некоторых обьектов единственным языком картографирования есть украиснкий
Alan (2025-11-25 18:59:16+00:00): Thank you for adding the Halkomelem name for Mount Baker! Google and other search engines don't handle the phonetic writing of "χe:t̕ᶿenəxʷ" very well, so I'm trying to find a source for that. 

Wikipedia gives "Kwelxá:lxw" as the Halkomelem name for Mount Baker. Do you know if those are basically the same thing in two writing systems? They don't seem quite the same. Are they two dialects of Halkomelem?
eerib (2025-11-25 19:12:35+00:00): I believe there are a dozen or so different dialects for Halkomelem and even within the same dialect different native tribes will use different words for the same feature. It's all very complicated and not really well solved at this moment.

I sort of recall the "χe:t̕ᶿenəxʷ" name being from the Musqueam tribe, which speaks the downriver dialect.
NeisRevert (2025-10-06 06:00:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/172895257
where the changeset comment is: 
Remove spam
impiaaa (2025-10-06 18:33:09+00:00): The office is still there, it just isn't generally open to the public, or requires an appointment. disused:office= means there's no office there at all anymore.
user_5359 (2025-10-06 18:56:24+00:00): I agree with you (but it wasn't clear without further information). I have changed the key elements as follows:
note="\"sign saying our office is closed to the public\“”
name=Solstice
office=property_management
opening_hours:visitors=24/7 off
Feel free to change it.
impiaaa (2025-10-07 15:11:19+00:00): That tagging is approximately what I would have suggested. Thanks!
NeisBot (2025-10-06 04:57:40+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description
NeisRevert (2025-10-06 06:00:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/172895264
where the changeset comment is: 
Remove spam
TrickyFoxy (2025-10-11 21:30:53+00:00): 👋  Тут два монумента или это дубликат?
WindOfHope (2025-10-26 11:01:55+00:00): один поргибшему летчику
WindOfHope (2025-10-26 11:03:40+00:00): а вот тропу к нему неполучается передать в программу
TrickyFoxy (2025-10-26 11:05:31+00:00): Тропы рисуются уже на сайте. В приложении только точки редактировать можно
WindOfHope (2025-10-26 11:11:03+00:00): понял буду пробовать.Благодарю
user_21613747 (2025-10-10 07:54:57+00:00): 부대 삭제한 이유가 있나요?
Hans Thompson (2025-10-08 15:26:47+00:00): I would like to revert the naming back to Alyeska Resort.  The de facto naming locally is such and I view The Hotel Alyeska as a part of the total resort building and at a level of linguistic formality that is more marketing than what it referred to commonly for many years.
kevinp2 (2025-10-08 15:29:18+00:00): Hi, no objection from me.
Taya_S (2025-10-06 10:08:59+00:00): Hello Ya_Yeye_yoyo,

I see that you're creating a lot of Multipolygons that only have outer ways.

I'd advice you to stop creating as many unnececary Multipolygons and just stick with using regular closed ways whenever there are no inner members. 

Having Multipolygons that share the same outer ways tends to make maintaining the data a lot trickier and makes them more prone to breaking.

Best regards,
Taya Snijder