piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
une abeille (2024-05-13 23:50:25+00:00): Peut-être un image peut m'aider expliquer. Vous avez dessiné le clocheton à un offset different que le bâtiment.

https://i.imgur.com/0kXjc3Y.png
https://i.imgur.com/ejGVhX6.png

Il y a des bâtiments qui ne sont pas à 0.6,-1.54 — surtout les imports de CanVec — mas le plupart des bâtiments à Montréal sont alignés à 0.6,-1.54, donc c'est important d'utiliser la même offset. Quand je trouve un bâtiment mal aligné, je le corrige pour que ce soit aligné avec la reste de la carte. Cela était ajouté il y a 12 ans, donc c'est probable qu'il faut le réaligner.

J'ai voulu t'en parler avant que vous fassiez beaucoup de travail mal aligné. Je m'excuse si je n'étais pas clair·e. :)
PierZen (2024-05-14 00:03:05+00:00): Attention, parce que avec le 3D, il y a plusieurs couches pour representer les objets en hauteur. Et ces differents polygones sont alignés les uns par rapport aux autres. J'ai ré-aligné le clocheton pour le centrer là ou les pignons du toit se croisent et réduit les hauteurs, mais le nouveau rendu peut n'apparaitre qu'apres 24-48 heures.
une abeille (2024-05-19 12:50:24+00:00): J'ai trouvé un outil que pourrait t'intéresser: https://github.com/Beakerboy/OSMBuilding
PierZen (2024-05-20 14:38:54+00:00): Merci, cela me permet de voir en détail les derniers changements au clocheton.  demo.f4map.com semble plus lent à mettre à jour avec les derniers détails.
Frans S (2024-06-03 08:14:08+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
Please use the correct tag where traces leads to houses, farms, factories.
Highway= service in those cases
Tracks suits another use.
Please consult this wiki.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highways
Best regards
NeisBot (2024-05-13 20:10:07+00:00): Hi aiden6611, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1282586867

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
WoodWoseWulf (2024-05-13 21:40:51+00:00): Hi Aiden,

Please only add real features to the map. The fake beach has been removed.

Cheers.
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-14 05:19:21+00:00): Partly reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/151286790
richlv (2024-07-01 21:12:18+00:00): Sveiki, te dažiem rotaļu laukumiem noņēmu name="Private playground" - tas tomēr nav nosaukums, OSM to apzīmē ar access=private. Tas šiem trim ir pievienots.
artuuurs (2024-07-01 21:22:46+00:00): Es jau gaidīju, ka drīz pamanīsi un noņemsi, jo mums nesen bija līdzīga sarakste par name. Paldies! Vajadzēja jau man pašam noņemt.
artuuurs (2024-07-01 21:23:34+00:00): Ā, sorry, diskusija droši bija ar HellMap.
richlv (2024-07-02 20:33:34+00:00): Kaut ko varbūt par parkingu nosaukumiem runājām, bet jebkurā gadījumā - viss kārtībā, kopā palēnām karti uzlabojam :)
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-12 06:18:45+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11902060487/history has id = 136520 that was added in this edit
What is the meaning of this unusual key? Is this tag needed?
Or maybe can it be expressed in a more typical way that would be easier to understand?
Or maybe this key can and should be documented as useful tagging schema?
mataharimau (2024-06-04 18:22:50+00:00): Hi Rayth, thks for updating Sg Rasau. I've been updating rivers in Selangor for the past 1 month, and I hope you won't mind me giving some pointers:

1) Way: Sungai Rasau https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1282593221 begins correctly until node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11902084880 where the waterway should continue south towards Blue Lagoon Waterfall and further to Taman Pertanian University where it joins with the already existing Sg Rasau mapped there https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/878669711 . After node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11902084880 it should not be flowing east towards Kinrara Golf Club as rivers don't flow uphill (check against topo lines).

2) Way: Sungai Rasau https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1282593220 is not Sg Rasau but actually Sg Bohol tributary and very rarely culverts run under buildings. If you look carefully on ESRI, you can actually see the monsoon drain running below the trees in between Petronas and BK5 Hening Park https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1531129755 . This stream is NOT connected to Sg Rasau but begins from https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11902084899 

3) As mentioned above, there is no connection between https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11902084889 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11902084899 . The Sg Rasau tributary begins at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11902084889 to flow WEST to join the main trunk at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11902084880 

4) Tributary streams https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1112684894 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1112684893 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1112684888 should not be disconnected from the Sg Rasau main trunk.

5) Where the stream crosses hiking trails ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11902084936 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1112684882 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5156522577 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5104609835 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11902080155 ) you should map whether it is a ford, bridge or culvert. If unsure, place a fixme node where they intersect.

6) Waterways begin as small streams and usually flow for about 2 km before becoming significantly larger. So usually, the first 2 km of the river should be mapped as waterway=stream (can easily be crossed) instead of waterway=river (shoes fully soaked with water when attempting to cross).
Su Lu (2024-05-14 00:48:31+00:00): 编辑请注意已有标签和note笔记，disused=yes是线路已经废弃的标签，电塔离得很近并不代表两者有连接，很多看不到线的都是转入地下了，连接母线与变压器之间用line=bay间隔似乎更合适
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151284963
Filip009 (2024-05-14 16:37:14+00:00): Zdravím, pre nabíjaciu stanicu odporúčam vytvoriť hneď vedľa druhý bod.
borec11 (2024-05-14 18:31:30+00:00): upravené, vďaka
Glassman (2024-05-14 16:03:11+00:00): steps typically don't have tactile paving on every step. Usually they are located at the transition from one surface to another. Can you review this contribution and make sure that the tactile paving is accurate?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151285424
snubber (2024-05-14 16:56:17+00:00): Corrected to remove tactile setting, misunderstood entry.
bxl-forever (2024-05-13 21:42:43+00:00): Hello,

"3 étages plus rez-de-chaussée" means 4 floors for OSM, not 3 → building:levels=4.
eggie (2024-05-13 21:40:35+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
LanxtotVLN (2024-05-13 21:09:25+00:00): patikslinimas - smėlio dangos apvažiavimas
Ewrt1 (2024-05-14 20:08:39+00:00): There is no "proposed extension" of the road at all. Reverted in:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151330460
DD1GJ (2024-05-13 22:20:36+00:00): Hallo Yoshi_09_xD_09_xD, willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Dein Eifer in Ehren, aber Deine Einträge erfolgten ohne Rücksicht auf bereits vorhandene Infrastruktur und Luftbildversatz, so dass nun großes Chaos entstanden ist. Die "Parks", Gärten und Garagen gehen teilweise durch die vorhandenen Häuser und die Fußwege zu den Hauseingängen sind wild verstreut. Gebäude werden mit der Taste Q rechteckig.

Ein Park sollte schon viel mehr sein als eine Wiese.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

https://pokemon-go-forum.de/threads/pokemon-go-spieler-zerstoeren-open-streetmaps.3160/
Necessarycoot72 (2024-05-13 21:25:46+00:00): changeset comment is wrong. I meant to say was I fixed a bunch of iD issues
MxxCon (2024-05-14 03:12:58+00:00): Hello.
What is the source of this data?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151286590
FlowerHillPerson (2024-05-14 03:15:50+00:00): Hello,

https://pvnpms.phmsa.dot.gov/PublicViewer/

Apologies for forgetting to add the above source link to the feature tags.
Filip009 (2024-05-14 16:39:25+00:00): Zdravím, bola budova, ktorú ste nahradil kempingom zbúraná? Pokiaľ nie, odporúčam skorej vytvoriť nový bod, ktorý bude kemping reprezentovať.
McLovin654 (2024-05-15 09:42:02+00:00): Ďakujem za radu, opravené :)
eggie (2024-05-13 21:45:17+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback  De gebouwen heb ik verder uitgelijnd conform de BAG. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Silur (2024-05-13 21:43:29+00:00): Siehe auch Diskussion zu https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147769639
kewl (2024-05-13 22:53:12+00:00): Oh cool! I saw some signs in Ermsdorf and Medernach last week and thought I should follow them :-)
Kugelbaum (2024-05-14 15:04:18+00:00): I like that for once the northern country half hasn't been forgotten but looking at the inclines here and for example PC7 between Lëpschter-Dellt and Fléiber (try it and feel it😅), I think Provelo should also advocate for different sign symbology on more extreme cycling terrain. The occasional cyclist or tourist who doesn't know the topography in detail, risks becoming super demotivated and will struggle reaching his destination. Without an ebike or sub 1.1 gear ratio it's quite a challenge for most amateur riders.
m sartor (2024-05-20 18:33:17+00:00): Hello, Uphill sections are marked on the new signs (except for Heiderscheid-Heiderscheidergrund🫣😓). I admid it could be clearer, but we are in Oesling, there are no easy paths. In Germany, there are a lot of really challenging regionnal cycle routes signed the same way as here in Luxembourg.
PC7 will be improved in the following years to be more direct and a bit less hilly. But I agree, it's really hard today when you don't have an E-Bike
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-11-12 10:16:51+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11902319414/history has shop = accessories that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
shop=accessories ? What kind of accwessories are sold here? Fashion accessories? Car parts? Gun accessories?

Maybe use shop=fashion_accessories for clothing accessories, shop=car_parts for car accessories or other shop=* instead - see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Daccessories
NGlf (2024-05-14 05:20:48+00:00): Please group your edits by geographic regions.
mcliquid (2024-05-14 13:48:41+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap,

please note: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:web to
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
VARVAR8 (2024-05-15 20:53:31+00:00): Ok. Thanks!
CurlingMan13 (2024-05-15 02:53:37+00:00): Changeset reverted in part or full.

You can read why here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151338406
NorthCrab_upload (2024-05-13 22:10:13+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9212717217

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Martinligabue (2024-05-13 22:13:50+00:00): Thanks, fixed it
NorthCrab (2024-05-14 12:57:32+00:00): Thank You! It's all good now :-)
AndreaDp271 (2024-06-21 12:24:22+00:00): Ciao, per curiosità, cosa stanno facendo nella construction zone "Alto Trevigiano Servizi" ?
goterris (2024-05-26 09:23:55+00:00): Un apunt, vaig passar fa pocs dies des del final de la pista del mas de Cotna fins al mas dels Oms i no vaig vore senyals del sender que marca el mapa. A més s'han transformat alguns bancals per a plantar carrasques. 
Com que el traçat tampoc es correspon a cap camí tradicional ni al traçat dels camins públics del cadastre, no caldria eliminar-lo?
Jordi MF (2024-05-26 11:46:24+00:00): Tinc mala memòria i, si el vaig afegir jo, no recorde en què em vaig basar. Quasi mai ho faig només en base a l'ortofoto. No vaig estar en persona així que si no hi ha un assagador marcat en l'IGN ni en el Cadastre, es molt probable que em basés en les traçades d'Strava. Potser van fer alguna carrera o ruta que anés camp a través o que s'haja perdut.

Siga com siga, si tu has vist que no existeix cap sender, em pareix perfecte que l'elimines. Ja investigaré per què el vaig afegir...

Gràcies!
MxxCon (2024-05-14 03:16:48+00:00): Hello.
Please group your edits by geographic regions. There's no reason for this changeset to contain edits in both, Romania and an island in the Pacific Ocean.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151288098
MissMarcoPolo (2024-05-15 17:31:07+00:00): Hello MxxCon, thanks for your comment. I usually upload my changesets within a specific geographic region. This happened accidentally, so I appreciate you bringing it to my attention. Have a great day!
silversurfer83 (2024-05-14 09:07:54+00:00): Hi

für den Verlauf einer unterirdischen Pipeline wäre es in meinen Augen schon angebracht, wenn du auch eine Quelle für deine Daten nennen könntest. Sowas sollte bei uns schon nachvollziehbar sein.

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151288167
SG86 (2024-05-14 21:50:39+00:00): Hallo silversurfer83,
ich habe in den letzten Tagen mehrere Fernwärmeleitungen in Mannheim und Umgebung ergänzt.
Ich verwende unterschiedliche Quelle und kombiniere diese: Ortsrecherche, Karten der Betreiber (z.B. Stadtwerke Speyer https://www.stadtwerke-speyer.de/de/Energie-Wasser/Waerme/Fernwaerme/Ausbauplan-Fernwaerme.html, MVV https://www.mvv.de/waerme/fernwaerme, Stadtwerke Heidelberg https://www.swhd.de/fernwaerme-verfuegbarkeit, Stadtwerke Schwetzingen https://www.stadtwerke-schwetzingen.de/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/sws-uebersichtsplan-fernwaerme.pdf), Zeitungsartikel oder sonstige Karten, z.B. https://www.speyer-kurier.de/kuriere/wirtschafts-kurier/artikel/zehn-jahre-fernwaerme-fuer-speyer 

Wie soll ich dies am besten angeben?
Viele Grüße
silversurfer83 (2024-05-16 06:53:57+00:00): Hallo und danke für die Rückmeldung.

Das sieht kompliziert aus. Wir dürfen nicht einfach von anderen Kartenwerken abzeichnen, da diese auch durch Urheberrechte geschützt und ggf. unter einer nicht mit OSM kompatiblen Lizenz veröffentlicht wurden.

Ich würde dich an dieser Stelle bitten erstmal mit der Fernwärme zu pausieren, bis das geklärt ist.
woodpeck (2024-05-16 08:43:14+00:00): Hallo SG86, silversurfer83 hat leider recht. Mit dem Urheberrecht verhält es sich so: Wenn auf einer Karte nicht draufsteht, dass man die Daten unter einer bestimmten Lizenz weiternutzen darf, dann gilt, dass jede Weiternutzung eine Erlaubnis der Urhebers braucht. Das gilt auch dann, wenn es sich "nur" um Fakten handelt, die man einer Karte entnimmt (dann ist es u.U. nicht das Urheber-, sondern das Datenbankschutzrecht, aber die Folgen sind die gleichen). Eine Ausnahme gibt es höchstens bei amtlichen Veröffentlichungen wie z.B. in Zusammenhang mit einer Wahl oder einem Bebauungsplan - nicht aber bei Webseiten oder Karten von Stadtwerken. Bitte frage also bei den entsprechenden Dateninhabern nach, ob Du diese Daten bei OpenStreetMap eintragen darfst. Erhältst Du keine (oder eine negative) Antwort, dann lösche bitte alles wieder, was Du nicht durch eigene Anschauung ermittelt hast.
SG86 (2024-05-18 20:54:52+00:00): Ok, ich werden das Thema Fernwärme ruhen lassen.
Ich habe eine Anfrage an MVV, den Netzbetreiber verschickt. 
VG
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:13:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:18:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:21:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
WoodWoseWulf (2024-05-14 21:28:36+00:00): Removed, DWG report raised.
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-31 06:10:45+00:00): Partly reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/151403261
Allison P (2024-09-03 23:50:41+00:00): Could've fooled me. I thought it was a landfill.
felipeeugenio (2024-05-14 12:43:50+00:00): Hola Carlos
los nombres de los puentes son bridge:name=
y se conserva el name= original del camino.
Pero muy buena información. Yo lo arreglo.
Carlo5V (2024-05-14 12:54:18+00:00): Entiendo, no estaba seguro, revisé otros puentes y estaban como dices. Me dejé llevar por lo que me respondieron en el grupo pero, muchas gracias por la ayuda, ya aprendí algo nuevo. :-)
felipeeugenio (2024-05-14 12:57:16+00:00): Buena. 
Te respondieron eso en el grupo? 
Pucha. Ahora salí. A la vuelta reviso para responder. 
Saludos
Carlo5V (2024-05-14 13:01:55+00:00): Sip, pregunté ayer a las 20:49.
user_5359 (2024-05-14 10:07:13+00:00): Hello! Please notice your typo: Use alt_name instead of "Alt name" (corrected)
(Inactive) hairyhaggis_kaart (2024-05-14 14:11:32+00:00): Thanks for updating it for us.
NeisBot (2024-05-14 02:00:07+00:00): Hi anam_mori, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1282663732

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-14 05:18:17+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/151293849
user_8655426 (2024-05-14 09:45:54+00:00): anam_moriさん、こんにちは。OpenStreetMap (OSM) へようこそ。
OSM は現実の世界に存在する地物をマッピングし、正確で最新の地図をつくっていくプロジェクトです。(real and current) また、OSMの地図データはゲームだけでなく、さまざまなアプリやウェブサイトで使用されています。

OSMに架空の地物を追加したり、既存のデータを実際とは異なるものに変更したりしないでください。よろしくお願いします。(事実と異なる不正な編集を行ったユーザーは、ブロックされる可能性があります。)

・「ようこそ！」
https://www.openstreetmap.org/welcome

・JA:破壊行為
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:破壊行為

・Beware of fake beaches (Pokémon Go) (偽のビーチに注意してください。ポケモン GO)
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/beware-of-fake-beaches-pokemon-go/112413

・新規マッパーに、コミュニティメンバーからお願いしたいこと
https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2018/06/12/tips-pokemon-go-2/?lang=ja

---

・JA:初心者ガイド
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:初心者ガイド

・learnOSM (ビギナーズガイド)
https://learnosm.org/ja/beginner/

---

・JA:Map Features (地物)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Map_Features

・JA:Tag:natural=beach (砂浜)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Tag:natural%3Dbeach

・JA:Tag:natural=sand (砂地)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Tag:natural%3Dsand

・JA:Key:playground (公園などの砂場)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Key:playground#Sand_play_devices
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:20:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:23:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:19:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:21:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:11:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:13:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:20:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:16:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:14:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:10:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:19:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
HirschKauz (2024-05-14 09:33:02+00:00): Hi! I saw this by chance: please correct "Alt name" to "alt_name"
Greets :)
(Inactive) hairyhaggis_kaart (2024-05-14 14:10:19+00:00): Hi HirschKauz, I took a look this changeset and cant find the "Alt name" in question. If you have a link to the objID please send it over and I would be happy to fix it. Thanks!
HirschKauz (2024-05-15 09:45:09+00:00): Hi, the missspelled tag has already been corrected by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151304792 
Have a nice day :-)
(Inactive) hairyhaggis_kaart (2024-05-15 15:03:04+00:00): Thanks, i did see that shortly after messaging you yesterday. Cheers.