piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
wachsihh (2026-01-07 22:22:53+00:00): Moin,
danke für Deine schnelle Antwort.
1. habe ich erledigt.
Bei 2. komme ich zu einer anderen Herangehensweise.
Wenn Du folgenden Link aufrufst, wird es Dir bestimmt klar:

https://geoportal-hamburg.de/?MAPS=%7B%22center%22:%5B576221.8102846495,5927196.568610389%5D,%22mode%22:%222D%22,%22zoom%22:4%7D&MENU=%7B%22main%22:%7B%22currentComponent%22:%22root%22%7D,%22secondary%22:%7B%22currentComponent%22:%22root%22%7D%7D&LAYERS=%5B%7B%22id%22:%2219969%22,%22visibility%22:true%7D,%7B%22id%22:%222426%22,%22visibility%22:true%7D,%7B%22id%22:%2212883%22,%22visibility%22:true%7D,%7B%22id%22:%2234570%22,%22visibility%22:true%7D,%7B%22id%22:%2216101%22,%22visibility%22:true%7D,%7B%22id%22:%2216102%22,%22visibility%22:true%7D,%7B%22id%22:%222425%22,%22visibility%22:true%7D%5D#

Bergedorf ist ein Bezirk von Hamburg, in OSM ist das admin_level=9. Von diesen Bezirken hat Hamburg insgesamt 7. Darunter kommen die Stadtteile, in OSM ist das admin_level=10. Davon hat Hamburg insgesamt 104. Stadtteile sind in Deinem Fall nur Neuallermöhe und Bergedorf. Nettelnburg nicht. Bergedorf ist nämlich sowohl Bezirk als auch Stadtteil, Nettelnburg ist administrativ einfach Teil vom Stadtteil Bergedorf.
In OSM gibt es place nodes nur für die Stadtteile und nicht für die Bezirke. Daher ist der place=suburb node von Bergedorf der für den Stadtteil und nicht der für den Bezirk. Place Polygone gibt es in Hamburg überhaupt nicht, nur nodes.
Langer Rede kurzer Sinn:
Ich würde die Place Polygone Neuallermöhe-West und Neuallermöhe-Ost sowie Nettelnburg entfernen. Alle drei bekommen place nodes im jeweiligen Zentrum (hat Nettelnburg bereits, allerdings mit place=suburb, was m.E. falsch ist, da Teil von Stadtteil Bergedorf). Über place=quarter (wie Bergedorf-West) oder place=neighbourhood (wie Oberbillwerder) kann man sich zanken. Place=quarter wird etwas prominenter gerendert in Mapnik, das würde wohl eher dem entsprechen, was Du möchtest.
Sorry für den langen Text. Habe ich Dich überzeugen können?
Beste Grüße!
SunriseSeagull (2026-01-07 23:01:32+00:00): Moin, sehr gern!
1. Ich danke dir ganz herzlich!
2. Gehe ich mit, danke für deine Erläuterung! 
Ich würde vorschlagen, Neuallermöhe sowie Bergedorf als place=suburb zu nehmen. Für Neuallermöhe und Nettelnburg würde ich place=quarter vorschlagen. Ich persönlich fände allerdings wichtig, dass Nettelnburg trotzdem die gleiche Schrift hat wie Neuallermöhe/Bergedorf/Reitbrook etc., da Nettelnburg innerhalb der Bevölkerung kaum mit Bergedorf assoziiert wird, sondern als "eigenständig" in dem Sinne. Es wird ja auch auf den Webseiten als eigener Stadtteil beschrieben. 
Viele Grüße!
wachsihh (2026-01-07 23:51:27+00:00): Du hast Dich da bestimmt nur vertippt und meinst place=quarter für Neuallermöhe-West und Neuallermöhe-Ost. Neuallermöhe bleibt place=suburb, weil echter Stadtteil von Hamburg. Bergedorf ebenfalls, so ist es ja bereits. Nettelnburg können wir ja einfach so lassen. Es ist ja bereits place=suburb, was zwar nicht ganz richtig ist, aber was soll's. Dann stimmt auch die Schrift weiterhin. Die administrativen Grenzrelationen sind ja korrekt, das ist wesentlich.
Ich fasse zusammen:
Die 3 Polygone mit place=suburb kommen weg.
Neue Place nodes mit place=quarter für Neuallermöhe-West und Neuallermöhe-Ost kommen hinzu.
Habe ich irgendetwas übersehen?
SunriseSeagull (2026-01-08 00:30:27+00:00): Nein, aktueller Stand ist nichts übersehen! Ich danke dir auf jeden Fall für dein Feedback! Magst du es machen?
wachsihh (2026-01-08 00:55:15+00:00): Danke für Dein Vertrauen. Ich sehe aber keinen Grund, warum Du das nicht selbst machen solltest. Das kannst Du sicher genauso gut (oder schlecht), wie ich. ;-)
NeisBot (2026-01-06 05:13:27+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 7 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1225559722 v4 | 5 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=176876598
calvinficenec (2026-01-05 20:03:22+00:00): I'm asking for a review because I'm new to this. If it looks good, I plan to continue throughout the city. I've been using Rapid (will probably switch to JOSM soon) with Microsoft Buildings and US Addresses, manually approving each building from Microsoft and typing in the address so it's on the house and not a separate point. Is that the best way to do this?
user_5359 (2026-01-05 20:18:39+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Thanks for your addition!

Please remember that an address must consist of at least a house number and street name (additional information such as city, country and state can be calculated using the available boundary data).
felipeeugenio (2026-01-06 01:16:35+00:00): Hola. Ese es el nombre de la calle o del condominio?
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176876770
Udarian (2026-01-05 20:51:22+00:00): Please do not do any other tasks within this area for this OSMUS tasking manager project as it conflicts with the area of an existing project on OSMUS that is public, https://tasks.openstreetmap.us/projects/876

Happy Mapping,
Udar.
RVR015 (2026-01-05 21:10:01+00:00): Hi Udar! Could you send me your project's bounding box like last time? That will be super helpful for us.
Udarian (2026-01-05 22:29:25+00:00): The geojson file with the area that the existing project is within is https://github.com/Udarthegreat/public-sources/blob/main/tasking%20manager/pedestrian%20feature%20addition%201/area%20for%20sidewalks.geojson

Please tell me if you need anything else.

Happy mapping,
Udar.
VLD277 (2026-01-07 16:44:57+00:00): Thank you, Udar. Happy mapping to you as well.
felipeeugenio (2026-01-06 01:18:41+00:00): Hola. No hacemos dibujos esquemáticos de las áreas. Si va a dibujar una casa tiene que ser con la forma de la base. Mañana reparo la edición. saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176877096
AndyB_66 (2026-01-05 21:08:04+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
literan (2026-01-07 09:44:50+00:00): вы можете писать осмысленные комментарии к правкам?
Fedorrr (2026-01-07 10:05:44+00:00): это обязательно делать?
literan (2026-01-07 13:05:05+00:00): не обязательно, но очень желательно,  если вы уважаете других участников, т.к. проект коллективный

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A5%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%88%D0%B8%D0%B9_%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BB%D1%8C
rempshaener (2026-01-06 08:48:17+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.
Für den ersten Versuch sieht das auch ganz gut aus.
Das Tagging ist okay, ich habe aber eine Anmerkung zur Geometrie: Hydranten sollten nicht mit Straßen, Gebäuden u. ä. verbunden werden. Das lässt sich leicht beheben: im Editor markieren und „E“ drücken – das löst den Hydranten von der Linie. 
Vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag und weiterhin viel Spaß beim Mappen.
Viele Grüße
ThoWeSZ (2026-01-14 05:40:59+00:00): Danke! Habe es angepasst und dann noch unsere restlichen Hydranten aufgenommen
MikeN (2026-01-05 23:51:48+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap!  Why was the driveway near the McDaniel / Cleveland intersection removed?  Also why were the crossing points removed from the McDaniel / Cleveland intersection?   Tip: Press Q to square the corners on buildings.
NeisBot (2026-01-06 05:15:12+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13433249530 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Webudvikling og WordPress-hosting"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-01-17 16:56:51+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/176891815
NeisBot (2026-01-06 05:15:13+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13433202500 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Cabin on Rush lake"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-01-17 16:56:52+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/176964925
AndyB_66 (2026-01-05 21:07:30+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
Mashin (2026-01-05 22:11:44+00:00): Hi,
are those trail physically gone?
MerlinSRA (2026-01-06 14:15:12+00:00): Yes, we closed the trail because there are hundred of trees across it and it is impassable.
literan (2026-01-07 09:42:55+00:00): и почему здесь два разных адреса на одном здании?
eggie (2026-01-05 21:41:12+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Rainero (2026-03-24 09:24:46+00:00): Revert mit changeset/180342162
(unzulässige Quelle)
Glassman (2026-01-06 18:21:00+00:00): If the church or business operates in the entire building, then just tag the building outline. No need for a separate node
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176878583
SafwatHalaby (2026-01-09 13:41:44+00:00): שלום ותודה על התרומה! ביקשת בדיקה לשינוי.

השינוי נראה בסדר, הנה כמה הערות לשיפור:

א. להימנע ממילות התחלה כמו דרך\כביש  וכו

ב. להוסיף את השם גם כ-name אבל גם כ-Hebrew Name

ג. להוסיף תיאור לשינוי שלך כדי שאחרים ידעו מה שינית. התיאור הנוכחי הוא "..."
NeisBot (2026-01-06 05:15:17+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13433199773 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Florist in Taylor Texas"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-17 16:56:54+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177344005
(Deleted leftovers after several edits)
NeisBot (2026-01-06 05:15:19+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13383583063 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Dance school in Beaver Dam"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-17 16:56:54+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177344006
AgusQui (2026-01-15 15:46:18+00:00): ¿porque?
i2004 (2026-01-15 15:48:14+00:00): estab todo muy suelto
AgusQui (2026-01-15 16:12:43+00:00): Si, estaba mal mapeado, pero vos no aportaste nada, simplemente borraste las vías.
Jordi MF (2026-01-05 21:32:10+00:00): Toponímia afegida de Lluís Gimeno Betí i Ferran Arasa Gil en "La toponímia del terme Municipal de Castelló de la Plana" junt a l'AVL.
Roydon Olive (2026-01-06 06:51:11+00:00): I don't think these streets exist. I was here last week, pretty sure they weren't constructed in the middle of Winnipeg winter.
Roydon Olive (2026-01-09 07:33:42+00:00): I also tried messaging you. No response so I'm going to revert these 3 edits.
dlegg73 (2026-01-06 20:18:00+00:00): Correction:
Comment is “Adding buildings southwest of Pindolonan #hotosm-project-18579 #adt”
Source used was Bing Aerial Imagery.
Kamil Kalata (2026-01-05 21:55:07+00:00): Ortofotomapy czasowe użyte w tym zestawie zmian składały się ze zdjęć wykonanych w dniach 13 września 2023 roku oraz 21 czerwca 2024 roku.
NeisBot (2026-01-06 05:15:20+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13384262912 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Interior decorating services in Georgetown TX"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-17 16:56:55+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177344007
bartgron (2026-01-13 20:49:51+00:00): "Rów" i prawie tysiąc zmian? Co to za opis zestawu zmian?
Poparzony (2026-01-13 20:54:32+00:00): Grunty orne, lasy, zabudowy mieszkaniowe, adresy, poprawa przebiegu dróg, no i oczywiście same rowy :) jak ja uwielbiam jak mapa oddaje rzeczywistość
Polska gurom
jm428 (2026-01-08 16:28:41+00:00): Hi, I changed it back because roads should not be split into two unless there is a physical barrier separating the road
Baloo Uriza (2026-01-06 14:35:28+00:00): This got added between the two westbound travel lanes.  Can you describe or provide a photo of where the camera actually is, so that its location on the map can be improved?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176881468
NeisBot (2026-01-06 05:15:22+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13386698522 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Bar and grill in Camdenton MO"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-17 16:56:56+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177344009
9_tab (2026-01-06 07:06:21+00:00): something went wrong here: tag "name" includes "name=" as value
Robot8A (2026-01-06 11:53:23+00:00): Thanks, I fixed it now
tomhukins (2026-01-14 14:22:51+00:00): Thank you for adding this to the map - I never knew it was here!

Its Wikidata record suggests the https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bunker_type%3Dpillbox tag might be suitable: does this seem correct to you?
Maptapper (2026-01-15 14:44:36+00:00): good suggestion - have updated it accordingly
Mashin (2026-01-06 12:25:19+00:00): Hi,
When looking at NH GIS parcel map, I can see the street labeled there. Are you sure that the street does not exist?
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-01-06 01:10:18+00:00): this in fact removed paved=yes
Frans S (2026-04-06 10:16:51+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping
about this building 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1464473547/history#map=19/7.608089/80.297005

You are not drawing houses with gabled roofs correctly. Due to the angle at which the imagery was captured, it appears as though a house with a gabled roof has an odd shape. In reality, it is a rectangle if you were to view the object directly from above. Try viewing it with the Esri world imagery as the background.

Best regards
Frans S (2026-04-06 10:21:06+00:00): Sorry, I ment to write Incorrectly mapped.
Best regards
sjwhitak (2026-01-05 23:40:42+00:00): Way 1150069582 is based on Bing Aerial Imagery.
MassCartog (2026-01-06 01:01:52+00:00): Hi welcome to OSM can you explain why you removed these features?
MassCartog (2026-01-06 01:01:48+00:00): Hi welcome to OSM can you explain why you removed these features?
❤️‍🔥 (2026-01-14 12:15:20+00:00): heya, nice work adding all these details ! do you have any thoughts on the tagging scheme itself? (https://osm.wiki/New_Zealand/Railways)

I asked for feedback in a bunch of OSM forums, and got heaps of comments from Germans, Australians, etc. but not a single response from any other kiwis 

The current tags are not set in stone - the only app that supports them right now is https://openrailwaymap.app/#view=15.21/-36.847515/174.780519&style=signals

so if you've got ideas or thoughts, please let me know - I'm certainly not an expert. and I've already found one flaw: you can't have a low-speed and restricted-speed light on the same node, which I thought was impossible, but there's 1 example of this in Penrose, Auckland. maybe others too
NeisBot (2026-01-06 05:15:27+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/353594612 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Anstal Czudec Rzeszów producer of pergolas and carports"
---
Na przykład, bardziej neutralna i obiektywna wersja Twojego tekstu mogłaby brzmieć: "Anstal Czudec Rzeszów producent pergoli i wiatrołapów"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
szydzio (2026-01-06 10:45:31+00:00): The name, address & tagging have been fixed in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176896574
grzegorz75jan (2026-01-06 11:55:47+00:00): Przynajmniej jeden w miarę normalny choć praktycznie każdy w nazwę ładuje to co ... zbędne. Jednak z to co wpisał w description to po prostu szacun bo nie było tam chwolby na dwie torby tylko prosta informacja.

Widziałem poprawkę tego tylko standardowy problem to nazwa bo na stronie po prostu Anstal czy tam Anstal Rafał Babiarz a w sieci Anstal Czudec itd. Już nie chce mi się wnikać w KRS.

Widziałem już większe kombinacje.

Autorowi proponuję dodać email i numery telefonów dla wygody odbiorców danych oraz tym samym większej finalnej skuteczności.
grzegorz75jan (2026-01-06 12:04:32+00:00): Na upartego to by jeszcze https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:landuse=industrial łamane przez landuse=greenfield mógł dodać to by była taka profeska.
user0944 (2026-01-06 00:28:05+00:00): Thank you for updating the lanes information, alokchauhan!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176883250
user0944 (2026-01-06 00:25:53+00:00): Thank you for your contributions to the map! :)
user0944 (2026-01-06 00:24:07+00:00): Hi there! May I ask why you changed this way (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1232152400/history) from a primary link to a residental road?

Best regards, 
user0944
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176883256
kuhni74 (2026-01-06 09:48:27+00:00): Danke!
Ahmed Wali Deria Guled (2026-01-06 00:35:12+00:00): Gashamo Hawd Somali Ethiopia
user_5359 (2026-01-06 08:00:35+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice the difference between a name and a description. A name only node is useless.
If you need more information (and cannot find any examples or ask anyone else), please visit our wiki at https://wiki.osm.org.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-01-06 01:10:22+00:00): this in fact removed paved=yes
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-01-06 16:21:32+00:00): this in fact removed paved=yes
eerib (2026-01-06 06:32:42+00:00): Hello InfilNorth,

You may want to discuss a protected bike lane mapping standard for the region with other users mapping bike lanes in the Vancouver, Burnaby, and Tri-cities areas as they seem to be mapping them as separate ways.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/ngry_pazuzu

https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/keithonearth

https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/nyanpsyche

(Personally I do not care what standard we go with)

Cheers, eerib
UW Maddie (2026-01-12 04:40:48+00:00): Hello, what is the source for the concrete sidewalk on the East side of the intersection between Lake Washington Boulevard and South Adams' Street? Survey? All I see from street level imagery is a gravel path and the changeset description doesn't specify the source.
UW Maddie (2026-01-12 04:42:33+00:00): Forgot to mention, the marked crossing too. I assume survey?
jay88g (2026-01-12 04:47:04+00:00): Not really sure what you're talking about, but it was built in the last few months.
UW Maddie (2026-01-12 04:55:14+00:00): I see, thanks. Make sure to list sources when submitting changesets if something isn't sourced from the imagery available natively in OSM.
NeisBot (2026-01-06 05:17:21+00:00): 🌍 Welcome to OSM, Ruchita C-105.
Thanks for contributing!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

✅ Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Removed doctor's office, including address, contact details, and accessibility information"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish
cs09736 (2026-01-06 09:02:44+00:00): Hi again, 
Just following up from https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176609741#c1535702.
These name tags don't follow the tagging guidelines as agreed upon by rest of the OSM community. I'd kindly ask you to revert the changes made in this changeset. This would help avoid any back-and-forth editing between yourself and other mappers who might not be aware of the PTV journey planner. The best place to discuss this would be the OSM forum https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/oceania or the mailing list talk-au@openstreetmap.org.

A suggestion for handling this in the journey planner while keeping to tagging best practices would be to add the (documented and widely accepted) tag `noname=yes` (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:noname%3Dyes) to these footways and then configure the journey planner to ignore any nearby road names when routing along paths with the `noname=yes` tag. 
In addition, the tags on the subway_entrance nodes (such as `name=Domain Road` and `ref=4`) should provide the necessary information to display the entrances/exits in the journey planner. The journey planner could parse these tags to display the station exist on the map. These changes would eliminate the need to incorrectly apply names to the surrounding footpaths. I hope this helps.
cs09736 (2026-01-08 03:23:14+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176967473
nevw (2026-01-06 12:07:40+00:00): Hi, this appears to be missing it’s outer
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20052530#map=18/-27.550730/153.158080
nevw (2026-01-10 01:51:22+00:00): I have fixed the wooded multipolygon area now
Tech Dec (2026-01-19 10:52:34+00:00): Thanks Nevw. Sorry I missed your comment.