piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2024-03-21 13:11:51+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped on both changesets 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148851143
emersonveenstra (2024-03-20 11:11:43+00:00): Hi there,

Thanks for adding these! One thing to note is that JOSM doesn't automatically connect intersecting ways, so there's a lot of trails that don't actually connect to each other now. You can see a visual map here: https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/#zoom=9&lat=46.702&lon=-88.196&item=1070&level=2&country=usa_michigan_upper_peninsula&class=8

Each pin is a place where two trails or a trail and a road cross over each other but don't share a node. Could you go back and make sure that all the trails are properly connected? Thanks!
Langlaeufer (2024-04-24 13:03:32+00:00): Hallo patzi,

Vorsicht mit cycleway:left:oneway=yes
es bedeutet vermutlich nicht dass, was du damit ausdrücken wolltest. Der linke Radweg fährt üblicherweise entgegen der Kantenrichtung. Deshalb ist hier auch default cycleway:left:oneway=-1. bei einem (nicht separaten) Einrichtungsradweg musst du kein oneway setzen.  Bei einem Zweirichtungsradweg hingegen oneway=no. Bei separat gezeichneten Radwegen ist es dann genau andersherum. Diese sind per defaut oneway=no.

Siehe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway:right:oneway
ZinaidaZ (2024-03-19 10:16:34+00:00): Добрый день. В этом ченджсете вы сломали мультиполигон https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15649798/
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148851608
gileri (2024-03-19 11:19:38+00:00): Hi,

When sending/saving changes through the iD editor, there is a dedicated field for the source (a bit below the changeset message box).
di5order (2024-03-19 12:36:59+00:00): Hi, thank you for this explanation
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-03-19 09:52:01+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 148748611.
CurlingMan13 (2024-03-19 11:50:59+00:00): Do not "lollipop areas to simulate a hole.  Multipolygon relations should be used instead.
eggie (2024-03-19 11:25:48+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
RaphaelPasloin (2024-03-19 11:07:08+00:00): Bonjour,

Il est indiqué ici : https://www.anderlecht.be/fr/securisation-des-abords-des-ecoles-scherdemael-p14-et-du-petit-scherdemael-m22 que les rues seront en SUL (sens unique limité)  si c'est effectivement le cas sur le terrain, il faudrait ajouter oneway:bicycle=no pour ne pas fausser le routage vélo. 

Une belle journée.
tordans (2024-03-19 10:28:23+00:00): Hinweis: Der Fehler zur Boundary Geometrie kann mit meinem Changeset eigentlich nichts zu tun haben. Alles, was ich gemacht habe, ist die Geometrie von der Straße zu lösen, mit der sie an einem Punkt fälschlich verklebt war.
streckenkundler (2024-03-19 15:18:37+00:00): Hei,

am Punkt https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11708733899 ist der Radweg mit der Naturparkgrenze verklebt...  anscheinend wurde deshalb im CS die Naturparkgrenze mitgezogen.

viele Grüße, Sven

PS: achte mal auch, wo ggf. was am Knotennetz fehlt, auch nach Sachsen-Anhalt rüber :) Danke!
RicoElectrico (2024-05-20 19:40:00+00:00): Cześć, pozycja chyba nieprawidłowa? Popatrz na tę uwagę: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4166920

Dzięki!
Benoît C MdP (2024-03-20 12:04:53+00:00): Bonjour Paul

J'ai supposé qu'il y avait une erreur sur ce way avec la présence du tag "cycleway=share_busway". Du coup, j'ai corrigé

Bonne continuation

Benoît
mapperue (2024-03-22 15:46:05+00:00): Ahoj,
keď upravuješ cesty, po ktorých vedú relácie, tak uprav aj tie.
Sanniu (2025-02-12 14:02:55+00:00): Hi, the street שלדג is not found nearby, but appears in address, can you name the street?
shiloni (2025-02-21 19:51:10+00:00): Please check my latest changes.
Branko Kokanovic (2024-03-22 20:25:44+00:00): Ime ulice https://openstreetmap.org/way/1264069371 nije Braće Martić, već Internacionalnih brigada, u RGZ-u. Kažeš da koristiš RGZ, ali to ovde nije slučaj. Zamolio bih te još jednom da navedeš koji izvor koristiš? Ne znam da li razumeš da dovodiš u opasnost da ti SVE izmene budu obrisane, i da ćeš tako da upropastiš pola Srbije?
---
Name of way https://openstreetmap.org/way/1264069371 is not "Braće Martić", it is "Internacionalnih brigada" in RGZ. You say you use RGZ and yet you didn't use it here. I would ask you again to state which source you use? I am not sure you understand that you are putting ALL your changes in danger and that your silence could ruin whole Serbia?
Branko Kokanovic (2024-03-22 20:28:29+00:00): Takođe, na putu https://openstreetmap.org/way/1233460137 si promenila ime, ali nisi promenila "ref:RS:ulica" tag. Ovaj tag nam služi da povežemo ulice iz RGZ-a i OSM-a preko DINA platforme: https://dina.openstreetmap.rs/. Molim te pazi
---
Also, you change name of way https://openstreetmap.org/way/1233460137 and you didn't change "ref:RS:ulica" tag. We use this tag to connect streets in RGZ and OSM using DINA platform: https://dina.openstreetmap.rs/. Please be careful
Silva1989 (2024-03-19 10:45:09+00:00): Survey is also a source
ian727 (2024-03-19 11:52:23+00:00): Construction didn't even start yet. This should - if even - be mapped as railway=proposed.
user_20264589 (2024-03-19 12:52:24+00:00): Sorry, war mein Fehler. Wahrscheinlich aus Versehen!
ian727 (2024-03-19 13:20:07+00:00): Alles klar, danke fürs Korrigieren!
Filip009 (2024-03-20 07:38:18+00:00): Zdravím, pokiaľ ulica nie je pre bicykle jednosmerná odporúčam pridať značku oneway:bicycle=no.

Taktiež predpokladám, že je tam cyklopruh v opačnom smere, takže pri cyccleway:left by malo byť "lane" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway:left
sely_p (2024-03-20 14:07:25+00:00): Ahoj, pozerala som dokumentáciu a malo by to byť zapísané správne takto. Ale môžem sa mýliť.
Filip009 (2024-03-20 14:21:41+00:00): Pošli link, kde si to pozerala.
eggie (2024-03-19 11:29:07+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Tip   Nieuwe gebouwen kun je het best laten importeren via het forum van OSM. Verzoek kan in het draadje BAG importverzoeken.. https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/nl/43


MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-03-19 11:50:55+00:00): Hier heb ik maar even mbv de BGT omtrekgericht de woningen wat gefatsoeneerd. Kennelijk was er nog niet ingemeten door het Kadaster tijdens deze import.
Jarno22NL (2024-03-19 17:52:12+00:00): Bedankt voor de feedback! Ik heb dit inderdaad aangepast omdat de huisnummers niet op het juiste gebouw stonden. Ik wist alleen niet dat dit geïmporteerd moet worden. Weer wat geleerd!
eggie (2024-03-19 18:00:37+00:00): Ben benieuwd of het allemaal al ingemeten is in de data van de BAG.
Je kunt het evt ook dan aanpassen met de transparant van de BGT omtrekgericht. Die kun je op de achtergrond zetten in editor josm.
Alles is daar ook ingemeten. 
In Nederland gebeurt alles een beetje dubbel. 
Zo heb ik hier de woningen in de juiste vorm gekregen. 
gr eggie
olo81 (2024-03-19 17:58:11+00:00): nazwa opisowa do poprawy 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Nazwy
Mariusz_Z (2024-03-19 18:09:51+00:00): Jaką nazwę obszaru należy tu zastosować ?
olo81 (2024-03-19 18:16:16+00:00): "Park Linowy", o jego darmowości świadczy dodatkowe tagowanie
olo81 (2024-03-19 18:29:04+00:00): Sprawdziłem co to jest, jak dla mnie to pojedyncze przyrządy na placu zabaw. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:playground

pasowało by playground=rope_traverse

nazywanie tego parkiem chyba jest przesadzone
osmuser63783 (2024-09-22 18:36:17+00:00): Hi, should the path alongside Piers Gill really be marked as difficult_alpine_hiking? The Wasdale MRT Facebook post is about people accidentally following the bed of the gill, isn't it? Whereas https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/283419527
is the path described on https://www.wmrt.org.uk/advice/accident-black-spots/piers-gill-scafell-pike/ as "narrow difficult path". I haven't walked it, so I can't judge its difficulty, but T6 seems very high?
martin-kokos (2025-12-12 13:26:07+00:00): Dobrý den. Děkuji za příspěvky do mapy. Avšak, chtěl bych vás poprosit o nevyplňování políčka name= v případech kdy se nejedna o vlastní jméno. Zapisujete tam popisky které patří při nejlepším do "note" například "schody a trávník kolem kruhovky".

 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Key:name

Taky doporučuji ukládat změny na menším geografickém celku
Branko Kokanovic (2024-03-22 20:21:32+00:00): ovaj put ima dva naziva iz dva smera. Ne možemo samo da ga izmeniš ovako, moraš da koristiš "name:left" i "name:right" tagove. Dođi na forum i predstavi se, ili dođi na Telegram gde diskutujemo kako da tagujemo ovakve stvari.
---
This way has two names from two directions. You cannot just change it like that, you need to use "name:left" and "name:right" tags. Please join forum and introduce yourself, or join Telegram where we discuss how to tags things like these
aleksandra991 (2024-04-05 09:13:46+00:00): vazi
eggie (2024-03-19 11:30:51+00:00): Gebouwen en adresnodes kun je beter laten importeren. Dan klopt alles precies, want het Kadaster meet alles in.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-03-19 11:34:54+00:00): Er loopt een import verzoek
Zie https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/bag-importverzoeken/3394/2009
eggie (2024-03-19 20:17:47+00:00): Het was nog niet ingemeten, maar nu wel geïmporteerd. Ik heb het uitgelijnd mbv de BGT.
Nu klopt het grotendeels. 
Groet
eggie
evod (2024-12-17 16:38:39+00:00): Hallo!

Ich bin gerade auf dein Mapping von Parkmöglichkeiten gestoßen bei dem du in Floridsdorf viele Straßen in sehr kleine Stücke unterteilt hast - vor allem an Kreuzungen wo du einige wenige Meter als eigenen way getrennt hast um im Kreuzungsbereich parking:both=no zu Mappen.

Ich seh das ehrlich gesagt sehr kritisch weil dadurch das Mappen komplexer und fehleranfälliger wird - statt einem way zwischen zwei Kreuzungen hat man jetzt 3, davon 2 sehr kurze. In Zukunft ist also mehr Aufwand nötig um dort etwas zu Mappen und die Gefahr dass man ein Stück übersieht wird größer.

Das Mappen der Parkmöglichkeiten an sich find ich gut und sinnvoll, aber ich denke es wäre weit besser die Straßen nur an Kreuzungen aufzuteilen und über die ganze Länge dann die Parkattribute zu verteilen - zumindest bei einfachen Kreuzungen im Wohngebiet (für Kreuzungen mit baulich getrennten Spuren und Rad- und Fußwegen ist das natürlich etwas anderes..)

Was denkst du dazu?

Ich hab auch mal eine Diskussion im Forum angefangen: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/micromapping-von-kreuzungen/122919

Liebe Grüße!
globosound (2024-12-18 15:10:33+00:00): Hallo auch, danke für deine Info bzgl. Forumsdiskussion, die ich mit Spannung verfolge. Das Thema ist auch für mich interessant und ich bin mir bewußt, dass ich damit "unbeabsichtigt" Straßen zerstückle, aber das ist halt der "Aufgabe" und der Realsierung der Map-Darstellung - alles auf einer Ebene - geschuldet. Teilweise ändern sich die Parkplätze alle paar Meter, einmal Quer dann 2 Autos Längsparken und gegenüber auch immer anders, wie sollte man sonst die verschiedensten Attribute verwerden wenn nicht im Detail? Ein Ansatz wäre vielleicht, wenn die "Straße" als Hauptelement unverändert bliebe und zB das Parken als Ebene in x-beliebigen Stücken darüber gelegt werden würde ... nur so eine schnelle Idee.
Ich lese mal im Forum die verschiedenen Meinungen durch um eine Tendenz für die Zukunft zu finden,
cheers und keep mapping
eggie (2024-03-19 12:30:20+00:00): Hoi Jonas.. Het adres heb ik weer verwijderd van de laadpaal. Die hebben geen adres in OSM.

MVG
eggie
Глеб (2024-04-28 13:55:19+00:00): Добрый день. 
Кавычки в названиях никогда никто не пишет.
За некоторыми маленькими исключениями.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Названия
tekim (2024-03-26 00:28:49+00:00): This is being reverted because it cited Google Maps as a source.  This is not allowed.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149154404
Глеб (2024-04-28 13:56:10+00:00): мусорки не имеют названия, их подписывать не надо
Frans S (2024-03-19 13:06:44+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 

The tagging of highways is often not correct.
f.i.  Tracks within farmland are paths or track, never unclassified.
When a trace is meandering through the landscape, and surrounded by green, it is mostly a stream or a river, like here.
Residential highways are not to be mapped in rural areas.
 How to measure the width of a road in IDeditor:
 
 Ctrl+⇧ Shift+M – toggle measurement panel Draw a line between the shoulders of a trace (zoom in very far) and read the distance.
 
 About tagging of roads: Narrow traces (<2 mtr = path) should be tagged as path, others as unclassified when you are mapping in rural area 
Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148856317
canfe (2024-04-05 05:45:16+00:00): Se inserisci i landuse residenziali, questi non devono intersecare gli edifici. Controlla gli errori del validatore prima di salvare.
tekim (2024-03-25 23:37:28+00:00): Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap (OSM)! Thanks for editing the map.  Unfortunately, we are not allowed to use Google Maps when we edit OSM due to Google's terms of use.
tekim (2024-03-25 23:38:39+00:00): This changeset is being reverted because it used Google Maps, which is not allowed.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149153419
thefabi (2024-07-26 18:04:20+00:00): Hi,

please use in future table tennis / ping pong tags as described in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport=table_tennis

In addition, with sport=table_tennis you do not need the name tag, unless it has an explicit name see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names

In Addition, Spanish names are usually not tagged as name in Germany. If there should be a Spanish name, there is name:es for it. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Localization
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-19 12:59:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 148860026 where the changeset comment is: revert deletion of buildings, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148859342
empty_child (2024-03-20 09:56:37+00:00): Good afternoon, Levan Zumadze
Adding "Hotel" in the name is excessive, tag of the object already says the type of POI
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-19 12:59:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 148860026 where the changeset comment is: revert deletion of buildings, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148859342
Joseph R P (2024-03-19 16:40:36+00:00): Hello, do you know if these roads are actually open/under construction? As far as I know, construction of the community was postponed indefinitely due to concerns regarding water and wildlife and has not yet resumed.
CurlingMan13 (2024-03-19 20:11:02+00:00): I am not sure.  Thanks for the info.  I was wondering who the actual heck tries to build a lavish and water demanding golf course community in the middle of the desert. Hahaha.

The roads have started construction, so I think construction tag is more appropraite than proposed since the ground has actually been broken.  Thoughts?  

Now, I recognize there are a few segments where the road hasn't been built/paved like the road *into* the community.  I was assuming those segments were completed since imagery was taken.  I'll adjust it a bit more tonight based on imagery to construction and lower road status from tetriary to minor/service as appropriate.
Chris Fleming (2024-03-22 13:30:49+00:00): It's mad, I was here this week and was just coming to make these changes!
tschoerbi (2024-04-06 08:53:42+00:00): When changing the shape of a building, please don't remove it (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/231840557) and recreate it again (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1264094493). If you just change the shape of the building, the history is preserved, making it easier for other mappers to understand your change.

By recreating the building, you created two distinct histories: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/231840557/history and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1264094493/history

Thanks.

All the best,

Peter
highflyer74 (2024-06-26 13:51:47+00:00): Moin!

Kannst du dir noch einmal diese neue Relation ansehen https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17363278 ? Da gibt es doppelte Segmente, was bei MP-Relationen als Fehler gilt.

Viele Grüße aus dem Bremer Osten!
nkbre (2024-06-26 14:56:47+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. Ich schau mir das an. Nord Grüßt Ost
nkbre (2024-06-26 16:02:26+00:00): Bereinigt. Werde bei MP vom LfD darauf achten.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-03-19 12:40:25+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7772975358
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2944274364
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2944274731
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11407511105
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/832567077
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/832568007
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/832566384
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/835734064

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
woodpeck_repair (2024-04-29 22:52:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 150683754, 150683768 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable edits by user who did not reply to any changeset comments
SomeoneElse (2024-08-26 12:04:52+00:00): Hello,
You have changed https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/662637905/history to an unclassified road.
What is your source for this?
Best Regards,
Andy
matt_ellery (2024-08-29 16:59:59+00:00): I checked way 662637905 this afternoon. It's a private track/driveway, so unclassified is absolutely not correct.
All the best,
Matt
SomeoneElse (2024-09-04 20:02:34+00:00): For info, see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/problematic-access-changes-by-microsoft-mappers-in-the-uk/117945/6 .
SomeoneElse (2024-08-26 12:06:10+00:00): Hello,
You have changed https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/537441214/history to an unclassified road.  
What is your source for this?
Best Regards,
Andy
tschoerbi (2024-04-06 08:32:44+00:00): FYI, I ended up removing the parking relation again you created. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149643976.

Please note the following:

a) When using relations, tags should be moved onto the relation, rather than exist on both, the relation and it's members. amenity=parking, for instance, should not exist on the relation and members.
b) In case of amenity=parking, it's not designed for use with relations and you should avoid using them on relations when possible. See "Used on these elements" at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking.

Welcome to OpenStreetMap and happy mapping,

Peter
bxl-forever (2024-03-19 16:18:42+00:00): Bonjour,
Je vois "review_requested=yes" ici.
Globalement, les changements sont OK.
J’ai uniquement coupé le trottoir pour que la partie sur la route soit un objet différent (footway=crossing), https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1264197694
Quelques détails très mineurs de dessin, mais sinon c’est très bon et c’est utile.
Si cette pelouse est un parc/jardin public, peut-être il est utile de l’ajouter aussi.
Fischkopp0815 (2024-03-24 11:11:43+00:00): Du hast auf Hooge einige Hydranten mit colour=blaugrau eingetragen

https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1J20

Farben werden in Openstreetmap mit englischem Namen order mit dem Hex-Wert eingetragen. Suche bitte auf https://www.farb-tabelle.de/de/farbtabelle.htm die Farbe raus und trage den entsprechenden CSS3 Farbnamen oder den Hex-Wert bei colour ein.
uhaase (2024-03-24 14:35:34+00:00): Farben wurden soeben durch den RGB- bzw. den CSS-Wert an den Hooger Hydranten und Notstromgeneratoren geändert.
woodpeck (2024-03-19 12:55:58+00:00): In this changeset you have DELETED existing building outlines from OSM, and replaced them with rectangular areas tagged as "buildings" which are instead the plot boundaries. That is incorrect. Please do not do that. I will revert the edit.
_Ahsan_Sarwar_ (2024-03-19 13:53:18+00:00): Hi, the buildings I deleted were imported by me from Google Buildings using rapid editor. I realised that they were very inaccurate in their shape and alignment. So i removed them again and started building from rectangle shapes as the majority of buildings here are rectangle. I then planned to mark empty plots as greenfields and adjust the shape of non-rectangular houses by hand. In addition, the houses I deleted in Safari Villas were completely inaccurate in size and shape. I replaced them with ones far more accurate. All that was needed was to adjust their boundaries a little. 

Please consider undoing the revert so I can complete the work. Thank you.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-03-19 12:50:24+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1806465073

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-15 17:10:05+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11745064213/history has fixme:type = shop that was added in this edit
What kind of shop is here?

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop for common values - is any of them fitting?
habi (2024-03-22 08:53:16+00:00): Ciao Voonosm

Du hast hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1264103464 neu eingetragen, der praktisch identisch wie der schon seit 4 Jahren existierende Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/751425305/ verläuft.

Ich hab' deinen Weg wieder entfernt.

Ä Gruess,
habi
habi (2024-03-22 08:54:11+00:00): PS: Ich bin "hier" weil sich https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/ beschwert hat, dass sich Wege überschneiden :)
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-19 12:59:42+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 148857292, 148857711, 148859342.
Hufkratzer (2024-03-19 21:48:02+00:00): Hi,
You have removed the tag building=yes from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/122965012. Therefore this building will no longer be rendered as a building an the maps.
Also the tag leisure=horse_riding is not for buildings but for complete riding centers. I would recommend to map the riding center with an additional object (node or area). Compare
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure%3Dhorse_riding
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/290985555
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2332110783
NeisBot (2024-03-24 12:40:41+00:00): Hello _Ahsan_Sarwar_, thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.Please see https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments \n
Thanks!

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
pitscheplatsch (2024-03-19 17:42:54+00:00): Hi leeshuochen, welcome to OSM.

Just a test?
CurlingMan13 (2024-03-19 15:24:49+00:00): Do not "lollipop" areas to create simulated holes in an area.  You should use multipolygon relations instead.

This changeset has been reverted in part or full to remove "fake holes" in the area.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148866920
aTarom (2024-03-20 16:07:21+00:00): Hola, bienvenido, en
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1264113273/history
"name"="Rio mierda"
es real o quizás "loc_name"?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Editing_Standards_and_Conventions#Local_names_(loc_name)
Saludos