piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
HellMap (2024-06-08 19:07:59+00:00): Jā, tur arī nepareizi. Droši vien tādu gadījumu vēl ir. Es gan nezinu, kā tos ātri sameklēt, jo "siena savienojas ar ēku" ir ļoti daudz.
somehundred (2024-06-08 19:10:52+00:00): Droši ar kaut kādu sarežģītu overpass query varētu sameklēt.
NieWnen (2024-06-08 19:35:40+00:00): Psst zostało `construction=residential` :)
Michał_Bielawski (2024-06-10 12:41:28+00:00): Zwrócę uwagę w przyszłości. Bo teraz to chyba poprawiłeś bo nie widzę w tagach.
NieWnen (2024-06-10 18:34:00+00:00): W tagach dalej było :P Dopiero teraz poprawiłem w 152511204. Zwykle daję trochę czasu jeśli nie jest to krytyczne + mapujący jest komunikatywny :)
Michał_Bielawski (2024-06-11 13:20:17+00:00): No tak, bo ja spojrzałem na 7 zamiast 7A :D Dzięki za poprawę.
Kees 59 (2025-09-22 08:59:19+00:00): Betreft node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11964850125.

Situatie: Jij hebt de tag not:operator:wikidata toegevoegd, echter op 2024-06-24 heeft Friendly_Ghost ook de tag operator:wikidata (met dezelfde Q waarde) toegevoegd waardoor er een tag conflict is ontstaan.

Ik weet niet of de node voor jou "lokaal"is,  maar zou je hier je licht over kunnen laten schijnen?

P.S. Is het mogelijk een idee om wanneer een not:wikidata tag of iets dergelijks wordt gebruikt ook een note toe te voegen met de reden?

P.P.S. Ik heb een overleg melding met een link naar deze changeset toegevoegd aan Friendly_Ghost's changeset.
fietswim (2025-09-22 11:23:19+00:00): Waarschijnlijk is de Ecotap tag onddertussen gewijzigd. Heb de tag vernieuwd
Frans S (2024-06-15 10:50:42+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please follow the instructions about tagging highways.
Traces just leading into farmland ought to be tagged as a track.
Traces just leading to buildings, farms ought to be tagged as 'service'
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152427962
webfil (2024-09-30 15:38:01+00:00): You have completely removed the name "Frenchville" from this node while the official town name, road signage, post office, etc. seems to use "Frenchville", rather than "Ville-Française". Geonames does not list the latter as an alternate for the former. Wikipedia does not have any reference to this name (and it was added by a user that adds random alternate names, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Toujoursfrais3#October_2023). Anyways, was the deletion a mistake? If not, can you justify your edit? Has it been made following a discussion with the community? Can you provide a link to that discussion? Meanwhile, I have reverted your edit, assuming it is an error.
eggie (2024-06-08 19:37:05+00:00): Dag Mattias.. Wanneer je adresgegevens gaat veranderen komen somige adressen 2x voor en andere adressen verdwijnen van de kaart.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=152428643

De Jysk zou op de adresnode getagd kunnen worden.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-06-08 19:39:28+00:00): Adres nr 17 hersteld
eggie (2024-06-08 19:41:35+00:00): De Jysk is oke.
Alexey Vazhnov (2024-06-10 07:06:03+00:00): Please use better text which describes what have you done.

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Good_changeset_comments

Also you can check out my changes, I hope I write good descriptions for them (but they are not perfect, I know).

Thank you in advance!
lanando (2024-06-09 06:19:09+00:00): Die Bäckerei gibtś nicht mehr. Die Ladenfläche wurde den anderen beiden Geschäften zugeschlagen, mehr dem Schnellimbiss
UKausch (2024-08-23 20:00:22+00:00): Hallo lanando,

vielen Dank für Deine Antwort und entschuldige bitte meine späte Reaktion.  Zwischenzeitlich ist die Bäckerei auch nicht mehr vorhanden, wir können den Vorgang also abschließen.

Servus & ein schönes Wochenende   
Uwe
NeisBot (2024-06-08 19:27:24+00:00): Hi OSM-UK-History, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 96% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 1 natural(s)
- 58 waterway(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
Wulfmorn (2024-06-08 20:27:10+00:00): Very strange edit. Definitely not a correct edit. Looks like this edit reverts an old landcover import, but is botched. The lakes are removed, but its nodes are still there.

It seems too nonsensical to be malicious. I suspect the user has tried to revert something but entered the wrong changeset ID.
rab (2024-06-08 21:09:55+00:00): tag like here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/274466253

#hotosm-project-955 #MissingMaps #RedCross

no one has ever come back to update the data! That means all the work was for nothing and nobody cares

I bet the same will happen to this project
eggie (2024-06-09 18:44:28+00:00): Dag CDE   Wanneer je bomen ziet langs de waterkant wik dat niet zeggen dat daar geen water is. Het is een schuin genomen luchtfoto en soms hangen bomen over het water heen. BV bij de brug.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-06-09 18:48:25+00:00): Waterlijn terugelegd bij brug, maar er zijn meer plaatsen waar je op het verkeerde been bent gezet door heesters en bomen.
Gr eggie
CasualDutchExplorer (2024-06-13 14:38:24+00:00): Beste Eggie,

Ik moet toegeven dat op sommige delen van de eilanden ik door de schaduwen moelijk kan zien waar de waterkant eindigt en het land begint.

Indien ik met de andere eilanden aan de slag ga, zal ik in het vervolg om die reden controleverzoeken gaan sturen bij het uploaden van die aanpassingen.
CasualDutchExplorer (2024-06-13 14:38:48+00:00): Met vriendelijke groeten,

CasualDutchExplorer
eggie (2024-06-13 14:47:46+00:00): Hoi CDE

Op de achtergrond van de PDOK foto leg ik de transparant van de BGT omtrekgericht. Je ziet dan precies waar het water begint.
In de regel klopt het wel. Een andere truc is de hoogtekaart gebruiken. AHN.
Dan zie je tot hoever het water loopt.
Een controleverzoek heeft alleen zin als je een upload doet, want anders zien we de mutatie niet.

Wat leesvoer
BGT implementeren  

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59021 

Forumdraadje ..  De beste imagery layers om NL OSM te mappen met JOSM. 

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/de-beste-imagery-layers-om-nl-osm-te-mappen-met-josm/85393 

 

Hier kun je zien hoe je de .jos file kunt gebruiken binnen JOSM.  
https://youtu.be/33EenoZezWg 

Mapse
eggie
CasualDutchExplorer (2024-06-14 10:34:05+00:00): Beste Eggie,

Bedankt voor de links.
Dan ga ik binnenkort instuderen voordat ik verder ga met de eilanden.

Met vriendelijke groeten,
CasualDutchExplorer
Khidistavi (2024-06-10 12:40:36+00:00): Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152495650
wungasaurus (2024-06-13 05:51:25+00:00): K43, sagt mein LBM-Kontakt.
ce_75554 (2024-06-08 20:10:28+00:00): Part of the Via Belvedere was renamed Via Don Domenico Colombo in honour of the late priest Don Domenico.
Langlaeufer (2024-06-10 08:40:52+00:00): hallo drops,
bist du dir sicher mit concrete:plates:
Das wären Schwerlastbetonplatten.
Normale Gewegplatten zähen als paving stones.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:surface
drops09 (2024-06-10 12:10:34+00:00): Hallo Langlaeufer,
die Annahme ist korrekt. Es sind paving Stones!
Gruß drops
Langlaeufer (2024-06-10 18:03:59+00:00): Das wird gerne verwechselt
NorthCrab_upload (2024-06-08 20:40:26+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nieprawidłowa wartość addr:postcode. Kod pocztowy powinien być formatu XX-XXX, gdzie X oznacza cyfrę.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/188416914

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2024-06-08 20:50:31+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11964590228

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-03-20 20:05:52+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11964946044/history has shop = barbershop that was added in this edit
shop=barbershop ? Maybe following https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:hairdresser%3Dbarber would be a good idea and shop=hairdresser hairdresser=barber would be a better tagging?
NorthCrab_upload (2024-06-08 20:50:30+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6933092583
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7162413800

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
sjakobi (2024-11-30 00:42:26+00:00): Hallo Jochen!

Seit deiner Änderung hat die Lützner Straße hier angeblich surface=clinker_plates. Abgesehen davon, dass ich diese Art von Oberfläche noch nie zuvor in OSM gesehen habe, bin ich eigentlich ziemlich überzeugt, dass die Straße immer noch asphaltiert ist.

Ein Flüchtigkeitsfehler vielleicht?!

Grüße!
Simon
JochenB (2024-11-30 18:03:22+00:00): Ja, mir unerklärlich. Ich habe eigentlich nur die Oberflächen der Gehwege berichtigt.

Hab den Fehler eben beseitigt, Danke für den Hinweis!
mapper0926 (2024-06-11 16:52:32+00:00): Thanks a lot
KiloThree (2024-06-09 03:39:37+00:00): This is a busy pedestrian plaza
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152432124
BrackoNe (2024-06-08 21:06:28+00:00): Other infos like internal id and the address is taken from https://www.nisgazprom.rs/vesti/dobro-dosli-na-otvaranje-bs-valjevo-5/
KiloThree (2024-06-09 03:39:27+00:00): This is a plaza with some sitting areas and trees, not a building
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152432521
KiloThree (2024-06-09 03:39:03+00:00): There's no building here? This is a plaza, variably with a tent on part of it
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152432546
bbqman (2024-06-08 21:25:43+00:00): Source is https://www.moleavon.co.uk/axminsterstore
Friendly_Ghost (2024-06-11 11:39:12+00:00): This edit has been fully reverted because it added military landuse in an active conflict zone.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152539199
tyfi (2024-06-08 21:31:14+00:00): Imagery is not updated yet. The parking lot is gone. Please don't re-add it.
LEO-LL (2024-07-08 15:07:42+00:00): Please restrain from adding street names that are not approved by Liberland govt.
Bienson (2024-06-10 04:40:38+00:00): Weiterhin gilt:

Bitte Edits kleinteiliger aufsplitten. Ich würde gerne die Edits an https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1222144814 zurücksetzen, muss das aber jetzt manuell tun, um nicht alle anderen Änderungen zu revertieren.
Filip009 (2024-06-09 15:03:43+00:00): Zdravím, vďaka za prispievanie do OpenStreetMap.

Prečo je na tejto ceste zakázaný vjazd všetkým a zároveň je povolený chodcom, cyklistom a koňom? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1288885462/history Motorové vozidlá tadiaľ nemôžu prejsť?
Peter Liptovský Hrádok (2024-06-09 18:25:05+00:00): Sú tam značky "zákaz vjazdu všetkých vozidiel". Prečo to tak je, neviem.
Filip009 (2024-06-10 03:46:18+00:00): Potom stačilo pridať vehicle=no.
Peter Liptovský Hrádok (2024-06-10 05:30:59+00:00): Pravda :-)
Peter Liptovský Hrádok (2024-06-11 14:52:35+00:00): Zdravím,
V začiatku zákazovej ulice zasahuje do nej cesta pre autá. Nemalo by to byť. Ako by sa to dalo vyriešiť? Ďakujem
Filip009 (2024-06-11 15:00:17+00:00): Neviem si to bohužiaľ predstaviť. Viete pridať nejaké fotky napríklad na freemap.sk a potom by som vám vedel poradiť.
Peter Liptovský Hrádok (2024-06-12 19:18:41+00:00): Na tejto pozícii vidno, že do cesty, kde je zákaz, vchádza cesta, kde je povolené ísť. To by tom práve nechcel.
49.04293, 19.72709
Filip009 (2024-06-12 19:51:34+00:00): Už teraz pravdepodobne chápem. Nedá sa to nejak vyriešiť. Každý vykreslovač mapy si to vykresľuje po svojom. Na jednej mape to môže byť vidno na druhej nie. V dátach je to dobre, takže by som to nechal takto ako to je :)
LEO-LL (2024-07-08 15:17:11+00:00): Wrong location of Marina Mateos - please if you would like to edit the map, first visit the area and get to know the facts.
LEO-LL (2024-07-08 15:16:51+00:00): Wrong location of Marina Mateos - please if you would like to edit the map, first visit the area and get to know the facts.
yrtimiD (2024-06-10 20:31:40+00:00): Hello and welcome!
Please be sure to not copy anything from not approved sources like govmap. It's matter of licensing and this is very serious topic.
martinst (2026-01-11 18:20:53+00:00): In Note 4955844 it has been reported that there is no real path (Way 1290519222). 
Last time I have been there I also did not notice a path on that ridge.
Can you please comment on that note?
StopConsuming_StartProducing (2026-01-11 22:14:17+00:00): Unfortunately, the path has bad visibility, but it sometimes appears and then is lost again. But it connects to the path further uphill to the west, which crosses it and then ends. This path is clearly visible and its only way out is this terribly visible path.

I have changed the path's SAC scale to T3. It is already with horrible visibility. So, I think people clearly shouldnt expect a proper path here.
StopConsuming_StartProducing (2026-01-11 22:15:30+00:00): However, it is an important connection to the main path uphill along the ridge that heads up to the cross.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-06-08 22:00:17+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11965055439

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NeisBot (2024-06-08 22:16:52+00:00): Hello GbiriJoe,
Welcome to OSM, and thank you for your contributions!

I've taken a look at your recent edits and wanted to discuss a few discrepancies I noticed regarding the surrounding environmental features. Specifically, the locations in your edits don't seem to align with the typical geographical characteristics expected in that area. Here are the relevant links to the edits:
https://osm.org/node/11965079850
https://osm.org/node/11965079842
https://osm.org/node/11965079821
https://osm.org/node/11965079810
https://osm.org/node/11965079809
https://osm.org/node/11965079836
https://osm.org/node/11965079714
https://osm.org/node/11965079715
https://osm.org/node/11965079732
https://osm.org/node/11965079795
https://osm.org/way/1290521449
https://osm.org/way/1290521448
https://osm.org/way/1290521443
https://osm.org/way/1290521442
https://osm.org/way/1290521441
https://osm.org/way/1290521440
https://osm.org/way/1290521447
https://osm.org/way/1290521446
https://osm.org/way/1290521445
https://osm.org/way/1290521444
https://osm.org/way/1290521435
https://osm.org/way/1290521439
https://osm.org/way/1290521438
https://osm.org/way/1290521437
https://osm.org/way/1290521436

Could you please take a look?
Looking forward to your response.

#Somewhere
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-09 08:11:20+00:00): Should partly be reverted, see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=152433586#11/-0.0573/0.0539
SomeoneElse (2024-06-10 13:54:17+00:00): I believe that "Purple Street" etc. are from some learnosm / teachosm test data.  I've reverted the changeset in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152499193 .

@GbiriJoe somehow you've managed to combine the training data ("Red Street" etc.) with actual new things that you want to add.  If you try again, but don't go near the training data, all should be OK.
Any questions, please don't hesitate to ask!
Jordan Moldow (2024-06-20 05:24:09+00:00): Rolled back in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152924346
Jordan Moldow (2024-06-20 05:24:02+00:00): Rolled back in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152924346
Jordan Moldow (2024-06-20 05:23:58+00:00): Rolled back in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152924346
WoSoe (2024-06-09 04:02:08+00:00): Servus HAmap.

Zur Info.
Wenn du Punkte einer mehrspurigen Straße verschiebst, vorher mal prüfen, ob der highway nicht ein tag »placement=*« besitzt.

Konkret:
Du hast den Punkt https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1487924342 vom highway https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/217436756 verschoben. Der highway hat ein placement=right_of:1.

Die Lage des Punktes war »richtig«, in Zusammenhang mit placement.
Siehe hier:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Placement

Ist immer noch Status draft. Ob man das tatsächlich braucht – keine Ahnung.

Gruß WoSoe
HAmap (2024-06-10 17:21:25+00:00): Hallo WoSoe,
ist mir komplett neu, das Thema - danke für den Hinweis! 
Ist der tag dann auf der Straße, oder nur auf dem einzelnen Punkt?
HAmap (2024-06-10 17:24:49+00:00): Den tag auf der Straße habe ich jetzt nachvollzogen - war eine unnötige Nachfrage, sorry
HAmap (2024-06-10 17:56:23+00:00): ähem ... ;-)
Die korrekte Lage des Punktes habe ich aus der Version 3 (Verlauf Knoten) herausgefiltert. Mein Versuch war mit lat=49.3895895 und lon=11.1194441 dem Punkt diese Position zuzuweisen. Das hat so nicht funktioniert. Wie kann ich ihn auf die alte Position setzen? In iD, mit Maus verschieben und über das Maße-Feld kontrollieren, ist zu ungenau. 
Oder muss ich meine Änderung ganz zurücknehmen, um das zu reparieren?
WoSoe (2024-06-11 07:12:44+00:00): Moin!

Der Punkt oben war nur ein Beispiel. Du hast ja mehrere Punkte von Linien mit »placement« verschoben.

Auch vorherige Mapper haben das placement nicht immer beachtet. Daher würde ich das jetzt erst mal so lassen.

Eventuell sollte der ganzen Bereich mal überarbeitet werden, das lanes-Mapping stimmt ja teilweise auch nicht mehr.

Direkte Koordinateneingabe ist glaube ich in iD nicht möglich.
JOSM kann das und auch Koordinaten früherer Änderungen direkt wieder herstellen.
HAmap (2024-06-11 11:30:50+00:00): Ok, dann verbuche ich das unter Lernerfahrung und passe zukünftig auf placement-tags auf. Danke für deine Aufmerksamkeit und die Info zu den Koordinaten. Noch ein Grund auf JOSM umzusteigen ...

Die lanes schaue ich mir noch mal an. Falls ich da etwas verschlimmert habe, mache ich mich gerne drüber das wieder zu korrigieren bzw. auch ältere Fehler zu verbessern.
rohieb (2024-09-23 09:13:06+00:00): note: access=yes would imply access even to vehicles, which is not the case here. Furthermore, it is the default so I would remove it.
Patchi (2024-06-09 07:50:59+00:00): Bonjour chamdam,

Merci pour ce changement. Toutefois l'ajout des tags sur le chemin délimitant la plateforme ne résout malheureusement pas le problème initial (voir mon commentaire sur le changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152324477). PTNA ne donne certes plus d'erreur mais le problème a la base est la transformation de la plateforme en multipolygon.
De plus dans une relation de type multipolygon, le chemin du contour externe ne doit pas être étiqueté (voir la page wiki multipolygon -> usage https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Relation:multipolygon#Utilisation). Je serais donc d'avis d'attendre un retour de utilisateur HaPe-CZ avant de faire les autres changements nécessaires.

Bonne continuation,

Patchi.
KiloThree (2024-06-09 03:42:34+00:00): Hello, please try to keep changesets locally constrained. It looks like you've gone and changed all 3 instances of `hammerw` even though they are on separate continents
Armando Hasanbelliu (2024-06-08 22:56:21+00:00): Per chiarezza ho modificato la strada provinciale 19.
Jordan Moldow (2024-06-20 05:23:53+00:00): Rolled back in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152924346
NorthCrab_upload (2024-06-08 23:00:13+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11964420271

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NeisBot (2024-06-08 23:12:23+00:00): Hi lightningpanther, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 82 building(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
lightningpanther (2024-06-08 23:36:23+00:00): This was on purpose. There were many buildings scattered all over the place in random places and did not look like buildings at all.
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-09 06:16:57+00:00): Thanks for your reply.

#HappyMapping
LockOnGuy (2024-06-09 21:21:49+00:00): Hello, Thank you for the corrections, may you please specify the source please, just to make sure? regards.
desertivy (2024-06-10 10:13:46+00:00): https://www.iasj.net/iasj/article/184845
page no. 101 (5th page), as well as my local knowledge of this area.
Metzor (2024-06-09 13:35:54+00:00): Hi AstroSinclair,

Thanks for contributing :-) 

Friendly reminder: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: 

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

 Why? Have a look at the section 
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
NeisBot (2024-06-08 23:15:23+00:00): Hi lightningpanther, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 79 building(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
lightningpanther (2024-06-08 23:36:37+00:00): This was on purpose. There were many buildings scattered all over the place in random places and did not look like buildings at all.
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-09 06:16:50+00:00): Thanks for your reply.

#HappyMapping
Jordan Moldow (2024-06-20 05:23:49+00:00): Rolled back in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152924346
Jordan Moldow (2024-06-20 05:23:42+00:00): Rolled back in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152924346
LockOnGuy (2024-06-09 21:20:09+00:00): Hello desertivy, what do you think about changing the name of this section to match the southern section of it? is the name Zain alqaus more common than alkayarah or it's the other way around?      
Regards.
desertivy (2024-06-10 10:27:28+00:00): Most people refer to this part as Alekiara Street, so for a better real-life representation of the map, I believe it should stay that way.
Regards.
silversurfer83 (2024-06-10 19:41:31+00:00): Danke
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152435287
LockOnGuy (2024-06-09 21:09:39+00:00): Please specify source for the correction I assume?
desertivy (2024-06-10 10:15:50+00:00): refer to discussion:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152435066