piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-01 05:31:50+00:00): It certainly doesn't appear to be a beach!
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-01 05:34:59+00:00): DWG revert - incorrect tagging

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164357374
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-01 05:36:00+00:00): It would appear to be a concrete letter in an area of rock. Reverted
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-01 05:30:56+00:00): DWG revert - incorrect tagging

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164357298
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-01 05:37:55+00:00): Please also see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17493 & https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17492. I had been going to give you another chance, but no, probably a waste of time :-(
cuzi (2025-04-20 18:51:29+00:00): Hi, du hast hier den Laden "Flo No 7" mitsamt der Hausnummer entfernt. Der Laden war mit Hausnummer 29 eingetragen, aber daneben ist auch noch die Hausnummer 31 im gleichen Gebäude eingetragen. 
War das so beabsichtigt, oder sollte die 29 wieder an der Stelle eingetragen werden?
Floz (2025-04-23 05:55:27+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. Die Hausnummer wollte ich nicht entfernen. Wie korrigiert man das?
cuzi (2025-04-23 16:10:26+00:00): Am einfachsten ist dieses Tool: https://revert.monicz.dev/

Das macht den ganzen Änderungssatz rückgängig, aber da du nur den einen Knoten bearbeitet hast, ist das kein Problem.
Danach kannst du den Knoten wieder ganz normal im Editor bearbeiten.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-08 02:31:37+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164658086
Taya_S (2025-04-01 07:36:44+00:00): Hallo VRT-2,

Heb je hier toevallig een bron voor? De  laatste keer dat ik hier ben geweest stond er namelijk wel een beperking op deze weg https://imgur.com/a/UUt9iVM

Zie ook de discussie hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150437056

Groeten,
Taya Snijder
Tolhuis (2025-04-05 20:16:00+00:00): Hallo, ik merk dat u de huizen van de Heuvelweg hebt geïmporteerd, maar hun adres is nog de Bergstraat. Merk op dat ook de oneven huisnummers aangepast zijn sinds de fusie.
mvg
nielsdg (2025-04-08 07:23:51+00:00): Ah, inderdaad, die heb ik gemist. Bedankt! Dit zou nu moeten opgelost zijn.
NeisReview (2025-04-01 17:11:37+00:00): #NodeDragging

Hello, and welcome to OSM.

Thank you for contributing to the map. I’ve reviewed your recent edits and noticed that at least one node of a way was moved. This can sometimes happen unintentionally, and it’s led to some unusual intersections or overlaps between street segments and other map elements.

Could you kindly confirm whether these changes were intentional or if they may have been made by mistake?

Thank you, and I look forward to your response!

---
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3714562847
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/208259312
Carlos Martin Noriega (2025-04-01 22:51:11+00:00): It was probably an accidental edit.
I'm from Valladolid.
I've corrected it.
NeisBot (2025-04-01 06:09:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam
Allison P (2025-04-01 19:48:51+00:00): Spam reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164391339
GeorgeKaplan (2025-07-06 11:06:19+00:00): Bonjour, 
Êtes-vous sûr de l’emplacement de ce POI ? Les numéros pairs sont de l’autre côté de la rue.
Philippe Vogel (2025-08-19 13:04:24+00:00): Oui,
NeisBot (2025-04-01 06:12:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam
Allison P (2025-04-01 19:50:23+00:00): Spam reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164391384
NeisReview (2025-04-02 06:29:51+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164361953
Langlaeufer (2025-04-01 09:13:29+00:00): Hallo Alexandr,
bist du dir sicher das hier jetzt asphalt ist 
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=788212582493709&focus=photo&lat=52.441745500266&lng=9.7011001987393&z=17
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164358431
NeisBot (2025-04-01 06:33:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment
NeisReview (2025-04-06 18:06:39+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164391372
TinPetreković (2025-04-01 06:49:06+00:00): Accidental node creation #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164359388
CarloCesarini (2025-04-01 06:54:21+00:00): Ho inserito un sentiero sulla base delle tracce Strava. Non si tratta quindi della modifica del profilo di percorrenza del fosso, come erroneamente indicato a titolo della modifica
geisthugo123 (2025-04-03 23:26:21+00:00): Hi und vielen Dank für den Edit und dass du mitmappst.
Viele Grüße
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-18 02:05:13+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165093515
sykul (2025-04-02 07:28:57+00:00): Merci pour la correction. Est-ce que le mauvais nom a été ajouté par votre outil automatique? Si oui, comment allez-vous éviter ce genre d'erreur à l'avenir?
infeeeee (2026-05-17 13:11:57+00:00): Szia!

Az utak minőségét, burkolatát nem a highway=* kulcsban tároljuk, vannak erre jobb címkék: 

smoothness=*
surface=*
tracktype=*

Az útvonaltervezőknek ezekből az infókból rá kell jönniük megéri-e arra menni.

Ezeket az utakat itt visszaállítottam

További jó térképezést!
osmviborg (2025-04-01 07:36:27+00:00): Bygningens navn ændret til 'archouse' https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/938804799
NeisReview (2025-04-02 06:29:47+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164361953
user_5359 (2025-04-01 20:00:58+00:00): Hello! What is the difference between the standard key source and your private key myosmnote?
大山かなめ (2025-04-01 07:27:03+00:00): 公式サイトから参照したのは収容台数と支店名で、76台とおよそ一致する駐車マスがBingで見える、隣と区切られた範囲を敷地としました（撮影が古い地理院の簡易空中写真では、現在の写真にある建物がいくつかなく、これも判断材料にしています）
eggie (2025-04-01 07:40:53+00:00): Welkom bij OSM,...

Je vraagt feedback
Slogan	=Expert in resultaatgericht samenwerken heb ik verwijderd. Dat is geen valide tag.
Wanneer Expert in
resultaatgericht samenwerken een onderdeel van de naam is zou je het kunnen laten staan.
... of wellicht onder description =zetten. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-04-01 07:44:17+00:00): language:language code  zou :nl moeten zijn en niet Dutch
Cdrik_69 (2025-04-05 12:34:56+00:00): Allô !

Je ne suis pas d'accord, vous générez des doublons, une grosse partie de cette zone résidentielle n'est pas une zone résidentielle alors stop ! On ne tague pas pour le rendu, VL Thorens est déjà inscrit ! 

Venez en discuter sur le forum de la communauté ! 

https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/detournement-du-tag-landuse-residential-comme-station-de-ski/32838
flohoff (2025-04-01 08:21:31+00:00): Moin,
hab gerade den changeset gesehen:

Steht da wirklich ein Schild das das von 6-16:30 nicht befahren werden darf?

Flo
flohoff (2025-04-01 08:22:53+00:00): Mich wundert das nur weil da ja ein Parkplatz ist - und die müssen vor 6 uhr da sein und dürfen erst nach 16:30 wieder fahren?
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-07 05:36:07+00:00): DWG revert - poor quality mapping

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164616539
eggie (2025-04-01 09:10:43+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
opendcc (2025-04-01 09:14:38+00:00): Kannst Du bitte erläutern, warum Du da einen Übergang eingezeichnet hast?
eggie (2025-04-01 08:00:37+00:00): Dag bpo....   Lijkt me oke zo. 

MVG
eggie
pitscheplatsch (2025-04-01 07:58:48+00:00): Could you try to answer my question: osm.org/changeset/164234032

Thanks!
matthiam (2025-04-07 08:22:18+00:00): cześć, jarqush, zestaw zmian spowodował usunięcie przystanku 'Witoszów Dolny V' z kilkunastu wariantów linii autobusowej nr 10 (relation/18516820 > members) . matthiam
eggie (2025-04-01 09:16:06+00:00): Dag Mr Blonde

Je info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode.

MVG
eggie
MrBlondeBlonde (2025-04-01 09:45:00+00:00): Hi Eggie,

Heb ik dan iets gemist of verkeerd gedaan? 

Mvg,

Floor
eggie (2025-04-01 10:45:15+00:00): Nee....., maar de consensus is om op de bestaande BAG adresnode bij te taggen. We maken dus geen adressen aan, Die zijn er al. 
Die liggen hier allemaal op een hoopje en met editor iD kun je dat nauwelijks zien denk ik. 

Het 'huis
'nummer is 1-0001  volgens de website.
Groet
eggie
FroschForscher (2025-04-01 15:29:20+00:00): AOK Bayern mit `brand=AOK Baden-Württemberg`.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164361965
müllers (2025-04-01 20:42:28+00:00): Hallo FroschForscher,
danke für den Hinweis. Ich habe den Objekttyp natürlich zurückgesetzt.
Schöne Woche
müllers
NeisReview (2025-04-01 17:13:53+00:00): #NodeDragging

Hello, and welcome to OSM.

Thank you for contributing to the map. I’ve reviewed your recent edits and noticed that at least one node of a way was moved. This can sometimes happen unintentionally, and it’s led to some unusual intersections or overlaps between street segments and other map elements.

Could you kindly confirm whether these changes were intentional or if they may have been made by mistake?

Thank you, and I look forward to your response!

---
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/345443229
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/167486303
A67-A67 (2025-04-01 11:39:26+00:00): Hoi,
De correcte tag voor busbaan is highway=busway, niet highway=service. Ik heb dit hersteld.
Lily6459 (2025-04-01 11:43:31+00:00): Dank! Was geen optie in streetcomplete. Ik zal het onthouden!
NeisReview (2025-04-01 16:42:12+00:00): #HighwayChanges #Tags

Hello, welcome to OSM.

In this changeset, some types of highway and their tags are being added or modified by you. 

Could we know the sources that you used? Thank you.

More information about the changeset: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=18838055
demon_box (2025-04-01 09:55:45+00:00): Ciao max5max, ti segnalo che in Italia sono si mappano mai i tags dell'indirizzo sull'intero edificio in quanto il civico identifica il punto di accesso all'edificio e non l'intero edificio. Perciò devi mappare il civico su un nodo del perimetro dell'edificio se conosci con precisione dove si trova (porta d'entrata) altrimenti lo mapperai su un nodo adiacente ma staccato dall'edificio.
Ho già fatto le correzioni del caso.
Grazie e BuonMapping!
demon_box (2025-04-01 10:01:59+00:00): *in Italia NON si mappano
demon_box (2025-04-01 10:04:04+00:00): ...inoltre il formato corretto del civico NON è

addr:housenumber=43/quater

ma

addr:housenumber=43quater

così come ad es. in caso di lettera dopo il numero sarà

addr:housenumber=12a

Grazie ciao!
max5max (2025-04-01 10:08:03+00:00): Ciao. Grazie per le correzioni! In realtà il civico corretto comprenderebbe la "/" che è parte integrante del civico che è stato assegnato a questi edifici. Se però non è possibile utilizzare la "/" la rimuovo.

Ti chiedo anche: l'elemento "indirizzo" che hai utilizzato è quindi quello migliore per indicare l'indirizzo dell'edificio? Ho visto che, ad esempio, sul punto di tipo "cancello" non c'è la possibilità di mettere un indirizzo.
demon_box (2025-04-01 10:26:48+00:00): Ciao per convenzione ormai consolidata nella Community OSM la "/" non si mette.

I tags dell'indirizzo PUOI tranquillamente metterli sul cancello (barrier=gate) se la targhetta del civico è posizionata proprio a lato del cancellino pedonale o del cancello grande per le auto.
max5max (2025-04-01 10:32:12+00:00): Ottimo, ho fatto come suggerito (senza /) e posizionati gli indicatori a fianco dei cancelli. Grazie di nuovo!
demon_box (2025-04-01 10:44:22+00:00): Ciao NO nel caso dei civici dei cancelli aggiungili direttamente sullo stesso nodo (non a fianco) del cancello/cancellino: ok?
Perchè il cancello E' esattamente il punto di accesso.
Grazie!
demon_box (2025-04-01 11:10:37+00:00): ...giò fatto io ;-)
Ciao!
demon_box (2025-04-01 11:11:09+00:00): *già
max5max (2025-04-01 13:20:33+00:00): Ah perfetto! Ti ringrazio molto per l'aiuto e per le spiegazioni molto utili! Ciao
NeisReview (2025-04-01 16:42:09+00:00): #HighwayChanges #Tags

Hello, welcome to OSM.

In this changeset, some types of highway and their tags are being added or modified by you. 

Could we know the sources that you used? Thank you.

More information about the changeset: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=18838055
MKnight (2026-01-01 21:14:01+00:00): prominence cannot be the same here like ele
ManelG (2026-01-06 23:06:07+00:00): Is it not the highest point of the island?
MKnight (2026-01-07 10:10:12+00:00): oh. ok, if its only one peak than ele is same.

(thought it must be relative to other peak)
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-04-07 22:52:09+00:00): reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164655316
Mashin (2025-04-01 10:21:30+00:00): Hi,
Thanks for adding the building!
I went ahead and improved the shape to better reflect the reality.

Cheers
habi (2025-04-01 08:32:42+00:00): Mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164363150 gelöscht
MorahT (2025-04-05 11:13:17+00:00): Please can you provide the source of this building shape change?  

I think it's likely you have accidently pressed the "O" keyboard shortcut and inadvertently circularized the building. In which case, it needs to be changed back to the original shape.
addedentry (2025-04-05 18:17:53+00:00): Oh no! Thank you so much for catching this (and explaining the likely source of my error). I can't revert this so please go ahead and change it back.
MorahT (2025-04-05 21:43:18+00:00): OK, I have changed it back again.

Changeset:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164569161
NeisBot (2025-04-01 08:36:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam
nevw (2025-04-01 12:52:28+00:00): I have adjusted tags and de-spammed the description
EneaSuper (2025-04-01 09:30:27+00:00): Ciao, penso che si possa mettere come short_name=Pedevilla 🙂
KNaing (2025-09-02 04:25:10+00:00): Thanks for your collaboration. Please make sure to draw your buildings as accurately as possible and don't forget to square the building, select them and type 'Q'
ralrei (2025-04-02 04:49:21+00:00): Du hast path auf footway geändert. Sind an den Wegen jetzt blaue Fußgängerschilder aufgestellt? Ansonsten wäre doch path passender.
osmviborg (2025-04-01 09:18:49+00:00): Apple Maps og OSM er to forskellige ting. Om apple 'låner' POI data fra OSM må stå hen i det uvisse.
TrickyFoxy (2025-04-02 01:12:36+00:00): 👋 population=0,75 это как?
b-jazz (2025-04-02 04:32:30+00:00): Hi there. Please stop drawing a bunch of connected or overlapping shaped representing the same area. For instance the rough around this object (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1373629377) touches several other rough areas.
eggie (2025-04-01 09:22:43+00:00): Dag robbre  Geen fietspad meer?

Een highway=service routeert niet goed in verschillende routers. Er lopen hier wel een aantal routerelaties. 
Wanneer het geen fietspad is zal het wellicht beter een highway=unclassified zijn?

MVG
eggie
robbre (2025-04-01 09:28:18+00:00): het is een geasfalteerd stuk weg dat naar de P loopt, je mag daar aan weerskanten parkeren.

Hebben jullie iets van een wiki ofzo met edit hulp ?
Ik ben L4 Waze editor, maar de spelregels van osm zijn mij onbekend.

gr, Robin
eggie (2025-04-01 10:28:03+00:00): Dag Robin,

Ik zal je opnieuw het welkomstbericht sturen per PB. Dan heb je wel handige links en tips. Ook naar de wiki.
Gr eggie
eggie (2025-04-01 10:38:18+00:00): Ik heb er  voorlopig even een highway unclassified van gemaakt omdat er verder geen bebording staat.
Geen idee hoe het met de toegang is voor motorvoertuigen.
Zie verkeersborden bestand overheid:
https://smoothefiets.ddns.net/html/verkeersbordenkaart/index.php?lat=52.277227603&lng=6.904055357&z=17

Laatste schouw 2022
robbre (2025-04-01 10:58:29+00:00): Dit stuk is gewoon open voor ieder voertuig, ben hier een paar dagen terug geweest met de auto
SomeoneElse (2025-04-01 09:43:16+00:00): Hello, 
Please contact the DWG by email at data@openstreetmap.org with a subject line of "[Ticket#2023050810000254] changeset 164364458" so that we can add you to the ongoing discussion about this.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group
vtrtsxlegend (2025-04-01 16:08:39+00:00): Hi SomeoneElse, I will send the amail proposed by you so that I can be added to that discussion but also that I can share any information or discussion we then have regarding this issue.
NeisBot (2025-04-01 09:09:48+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2025-04-06 18:04:44+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164391453
eggie (2025-04-01 09:24:41+00:00): Dag Robbre.. Waarom access=no.. Verboden Toegang.
Combinaties met andere accesstags en access=no zijn bijna altijd verkeerd.
Wellicht access=private met foot=permissive?
Op de laatste luchtfoto loop het pad duidelijk anders.
MVG
eggie
robbre (2025-04-01 09:31:00+00:00): ik heb hier gewandeld, gps trace van komoot gebruikt om dit pad in te tekenen.

dus wandelen mag verder geen toegang
eggie (2025-04-01 10:41:23+00:00): Oke, maar wat bedoel je met verder Geen Toegang.
Dan taggen we bv foot=yes (eigenlijk default) en vehicle=no

Maar geen access=no..   Dat is meer voor militaire terreinen
Ik veranfder access=no in vehivle=no
Mee eens?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-04-01 10:43:01+00:00): Kijk anders nog even naar het tracee.
Het pad loopt door de poel. 
Luchtfoto's zijn vaak beter dan gps tracks.
robbre (2025-04-01 11:08:05+00:00): ik zal even kijken naar het tracce
robbre (2025-04-01 11:13:52+00:00): ik zie geen poel waar het pad door zou lopen. 
ik heb volgens mij alleen dit toegevoegd;
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1373630612/history#map=18/52.162374/6.622317
eggie (2025-04-01 11:22:33+00:00): OP de luchtfoto zie je (nog) een highway=track lopen iets zuidelijker.
De (drink?)poel zie ik in de BGT omtrekgericht staan. Ik zal 'm even intekenen. 
Het gebied ten zuiden van dat bosgebied is allemaal wetland (wetland=marsh) met water en geen landuse=grass meer zo te zien.
eggie (2025-04-01 11:34:32+00:00): Het wetland en water heb ik ingetekend. CTRL f5 voor het effect.
Wanneer de poel er niet meer is kun je 'm weghalen, maar de beelden zijn zeer recent.
robbre (2025-04-01 12:06:46+00:00): pad loopt idd anders, die poel bestaat niet of is helemaal droog
eggie (2025-04-01 12:11:26+00:00): Hoi.. Wanneer er nog iets van die poel is en deze droog staat kun je intermittent=yes toevoegen.
Op de luchtfoto is het niet erg duidelijk.
Gr eggie
robbre (2025-04-01 12:26:22+00:00): ik heb geen poel gezien daar
eggie (2025-04-01 12:29:33+00:00): No problem.. hij is al weg.
Udarian (2025-04-01 13:14:40+00:00): is this based on a difference between the aerial imagery lyft has access to (nearmap) and the ones in iD (like bing) or would this commit still be the same if done based on bing, I ask because on the bing this doesn't look correct as there isn't enough of a barrier between the carriageways so that it would warrant splitting it up like this. 

Happy mapping,
Udar.
nlitvinava_lyft (2025-04-02 09:00:05+00:00):  HI, Udar!
My name is Nastassia, and I am the training lead on the OSM team at Lyft.
Thank you very much for your insight! About the edits: I modified geometry on this intersection, because, according to Lyft-owned background (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1VkPao1Q-40Afv9f4_tsqBEy16WSnbTwk/view?usp=drive_link ) and Lyft-owned street-level imagery (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1EQQQV9UE8GBIvVNeQ1SUk-gfaFpdh887/view?usp=drive_link), the situation was changed, and the previous geometry became irrelevant.
 
I hope this clarifies my edits. Please let me know if you have any further questions.

Best regards, Nastassia.
Udarian (2025-04-03 02:15:05+00:00): ok, thank you
that clarifies everything, you seem to have been correct.

Happy mapping,
UDar
NeisBot (2025-04-01 09:15:49+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam
K12230LF (2025-09-22 09:53:00+00:00): Bonjour, il semblerait que vous ayez renommé toutes les plateformes de bus avec la même ref : Exemple https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7194971213/history qui est passé de la plateforme J à la plateforme B. Et tous les attributs avec. Est-ce que vous sauriez remodifier cela en sens inverse ?
SpinOff (2025-04-01 20:23:49+00:00): Hej. Zapoznaj się z tym artykułem i lepiej nazywaj zestawy zmian: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
NeisReview (2025-04-01 17:00:50+00:00): #NoTags

Hi, welcome to OSM.

I've reviewed your latest map edits and it seems that this changeset you created includes nodes and ways without any tags. Could there have been an issue during the mapping process?

Looking forward to your response.

Thank you!
Harald Hartmann (2025-04-02 15:18:06+00:00): Hallo ioui12, darf man fragen, was hier passiert ist? Erst fügst du (korrekterweise) noch das material des überdachten Picknicktisches hinzu, um es dann hier zu löschen und einen neuen Punkt zu setzen? Siehe dir bitte auch die Historie des gelöschten Punktes an. Es war bereits mal amenity=shelter wurde dann aber (korrekterweise) durch jemand anderes als leisure=picnic_table umgetaggt.
Viele Grüße, Harald Hartmann
zstadler (2025-04-24 15:29:05+00:00): Is there a change in the Israel Trail route to bypass these barriers?
Tsur Halamish (2025-04-24 17:10:28+00:00): SPNI did not announce anything and their text is just "crossing Hadar stream" - https://www.teva.org.il/israel-national-trail/id-3428
They will likely use the stones that were laid just under the bridge.  Have a look at the picture here - https://israelhiking.osm.org.il/poi/OSM/way_306081203?language=he
Tsur Halamish (2025-04-24 17:21:41+00:00): The stones and the path under, are mapped as a ford. You may consider moving the relation to it, I guess.
ti-lo (2025-05-12 15:30:37+00:00): There's a description for "balloon tagging", why do you "invent" another one ? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:aeroway#Balloons
KNaing (2025-09-03 02:30:40+00:00): Thanks for your collaboration. Please make sure to draw your buildings as accurately as possible and don't forget to square the building, select them and type 'Q'