piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
lanxana (2024-04-18 15:09:53+00:00): El 28 de març de 2019 el Ple de l'Ajuntament de Castelló d'Empúries va aprovar por majoria el canvi de nom d'aquest carrer. Deixo l'enllaç a  l'acta: https://actes.castello.cat/session/downloadItem/8a808184732a1bc50173c86a042e0a19
AmyCupcake (2024-04-18 15:24:28+00:00): Hola Jared, si vas a 42.257737, 3.106120, trobaràs la nova placa.
AmyCupcake (2024-04-18 15:29:33+00:00): ho sento, vull dir 42.251439, 3.112515
SzymonH (2023-07-03 05:45:06+00:00): Dlaczego plac budowy jest połączony z torami metra?
Sylabowy Kot (2023-07-03 07:22:41+00:00): Tak już było wcześniej. Jako początkujący w edytowaniu w OSM miałem trudności w odłączeniu (bo posiada relacje?) i nie chciałem tego usilnie ruszać.
Sylabowy Kot (2025-07-26 21:11:38+00:00): Z perspektywy czasu bawi mnie ta wielkość bboxa... Fajny ten iD, taki niezbyt ogarniający, by takie różne obiekty nie mogły się tak dawać łatwo ze sobą łączyć oraz nie za bardzo potrafiący to naprawić.
multimodaal (2023-07-22 12:41:34+00:00): Je hebt hier ten onrechte de landuse-informatie en de camp_site tag weggegooid. Dit is teruggedraaid. Dit is geen pitch zoals bedoeld in de wiki en scoutin is geen sport zoals bedoeld in de key:sport. He is een camp_site, zoals ook aangegeven op de website van het eiland.

Wil je je ajb aan de taggingafspraken houden en geen correcte data weggooien? Bij twijfel kan je altijd in de geschiedenis kijken en de mapper benaderen die de vorige tags heeft geplaatst.

Als je daar geen zin in hebt, ook goed, maar blijf dan met je handen van bestaande data af.

Zie v9 en v10 in https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/relation/1398699
BertMule (2024-06-09 09:03:25+00:00): Dit is primair een padvindersterrein, waar ze ook wel eens kamperen. En vooral ook zeilen trouwens.
Ik zou het dus bij sport/vereniging scouting laten. 

Van beide is nu weer eens nauwelijks iets te zien, doordat sommige mensen overal maar 'gras' overheen kwakken.

Het is zinniger het motto 'vorm volgt functie' aan te houden, zodat kaartgebruikers kunnen zien waar het om gaat. Dus de functie aangeven, en het daarbij te laten, zonder er toch maar weer grassaus overheen te gooien.

Nu is het een groene grasvlek, op een icoontje na, waar gebruikers niet zoveel aan hebben.

Vorm volgt functie.
Anas masuris (2023-07-24 20:50:29+00:00): Na przyszłość radzę sprawdzić, czy edycja ma sens oraz zapoznać się z poszczególnymi tagami.

Takiego burdelu tutaj to nie widziałem dawno
G_Meredith (2023-10-05 16:37:10+00:00): You appear to have systematically moved through the map in the Chichester area altering other people's edits en masse. I would argue that your “cosmetic tweaks” are made for ulterior motives.
mavl (2023-07-02 13:35:38+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 137684791, 137684879, 137864218, 137934862, 137935524, 137935539, 137935573, 137935614.
Awoobis (2023-08-27 22:44:49+00:00): Please do not make fiction. Reversed.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140470286
semlys (2024-06-28 07:12:54+00:00): ну тут вообще-то не принято грунтовки подписывать грунтовками))
x210x (2023-07-02 13:45:24+00:00): >
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-07-02 14:09:08+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 138022816, 138022891, 138022991.
SomeoneElse (2023-07-02 14:31:51+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7240 for why this data was reverted.  See also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/topic/100629/21 and the following comments.
SomeoneElse (2023-07-02 14:37:57+00:00): For the avoidance of doubt, this is a revert to the state immediately before the edits - it does not mean that previous values were "correct".  As an example, I'd expect that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1184324514/history would have names in both Ukrainian (name:uk) and Russian (name:ru), and that the "name" tag would follow the rules set out in https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf .
Awoobis (2023-08-27 22:38:51+00:00): what is this garbage
user_18305684 (2023-07-03 13:20:11+00:00): Hi,

I suppose that Braun is the name of the bakery ?

I fexed it : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138064843

Best regards
user_18305684 (2023-07-03 13:20:27+00:00): fixed
Teddy73 (2023-07-03 16:17:52+00:00): Yes, thanks for fixing :-)
whb (2023-08-29 10:45:04+00:00): Reverted. Underground parking and road were moved by 150 m.
maciek-szn (2023-07-02 17:52:29+00:00): Wycofane - węzeł z obiektem stacji już istnieje - https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1843736227
maciek-szn (2023-07-02 17:51:31+00:00): Wycofane - peron jest dopiero w budowie (dla przyszłej SKM).
tomhukins (2023-07-08 15:34:00+00:00): Thank you for updating this.  The fixme note is particularly useful.  I've removed the old "disused:amenity=toilets" tag in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138268136 as the building shows no sign of its previous use.
ТатьянаC (2023-07-02 14:18:23+00:00): с какой целью вносите изменения?
ТатьянаC (2023-07-02 14:23:58+00:00): ой, написала ве своём же пакете((((((((((((
user_5359 (2023-07-04 07:26:07+00:00): Hello! Please take a look on http://www.osm.org/node/279712609. What is the correct brand value. Please insert the corret value under the key brand and remove your typo brand: .
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-04-14 08:31:20+00:00): roundabout entrances and exits should be separated. Also make sure to resolve all ID warnings before uploading
pavvv (2025-04-27 14:01:21+00:00): Czy hotel na pewno powinien być zmapowany jako obszar? Myślę, że lepiej pasowałby jako punkt w Ratuszu.
micholek (2025-04-27 21:20:40+00:00): Cześć. Przy mapowaniu kierowałem się wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:tourism=hotel?uselang=pl#Kompleks_hotelowy
Do kompleksu należą również kawiarnia i restauracja - stąd obszar, który je obejmuje.
Z drugiej strony wydaje mi się, że nie ma tu jedynego możliwego oznaczenia zakresu kompleksu hotelowego - ten obszar równie dobrze mógłby obejmować całe Miasteczko Galicyjskie, bo goście mogą sobie tam swobodnie spacerować.
Myślę, że faktycznie przeniesienie tourism=hotel na punkt umieszczony na Ratuszu będzie lepsze.
micholek (2025-04-27 21:25:35+00:00): Btw, ten punkt https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7749833685 zawiera historię z pierwszym mapowaniem hotelu.
pavvv (2025-04-28 06:26:26+00:00): Dzięki za link do punktu. Co do oznaczania kompleksu myślę, że relacja site mogła by pasować lepiej.
jumbanho (2023-07-29 15:00:46+00:00): Why did you make this change, especially without notifying the original editor (me)?  `surface=compacted` is the correct tag for these roads. While `compacted=*` is not a currently accepted tag, it does not do any damage to add a detail to the accepted tag on these types of roads.

Regardless, if I (or someone else) is incorrectly tagging something, it is polite to alert that person rather than just mechanically change things to your preference.
mueschel (2023-07-29 15:27:51+00:00): 'crushed_limestone' is among the 70th most common surface values.  It's better to use this value directly in the surface tag compared to inventing a new key that  no common tool knows about.
jumbanho (2023-07-29 16:15:45+00:00): The reason I included both tags is that the `surface=compacted` reveals a process, while the `compacted=crushed_limestone` refers to a material.    The combination of material and process gives more information than either alone.  Regardless, surface=compacted is correct and more commonly used.  It is also important for routers to know that condition.

Would you feel better if I used a different tag, such as`compacted:material` to indicate that the compacted material is crushed_limestone?
mueschel (2023-07-29 16:30:31+00:00): It's just not possible to inform each and every user whose tags I change. In this changeset alone this would mean to check 14 objects for their history to figure out who added which tag in which changeset I have to leave a comment on.

"compacted:material" won't solve the issue - the actual surface material will be hidden for all tools that are not aware of your new and undocumented tag. 
If we follow your line of thought the actual tagging would need to be
surface=paved
paved=compacted
compacted=limestone
... which clearly is not useful.

Key:surface explicitly allows for custom values, and this is in use in various states and countries.
jumbanho (2023-07-29 17:09:40+00:00): I don't feel like you understood my previous post. The surface tag represents a condition of a surface.  The condition is the outcome of both a process and a material and that can vary.  surface=crushed_limestone is a material and doesn't represent the surface well.  as a sole tag surface=compacted is better.  

Adding additional information for the.surface is accepted for other surface tags, like stepping_stones and gravel, so I don't see why the same wouldn't be true for compacted.
mueschel (2023-07-29 18:18:46+00:00): May I suggest to discuss these fundamental questions about the definition of the surface tag in the forums or mailing lists? A changeset discussion is not the right place for that.
jumbanho (2023-07-29 18:38:01+00:00): Seems like a good idea.
jumbanho (2023-07-29 18:57:47+00:00): I posted a question here and tried to be as fair as possible for someone with a point of view! https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/how-to-tag-the-surface-of-highways-that-are-compacted-crushed-limestone/101824/1
tux67 (2023-07-10 11:40:42+00:00): Hi kjon,
mal dieses CS exemplarisch für die CS Serie hier in der Gegend. Ich nehme an viele deiner Änderungen basieren ohne große weitere Evakuierung auf dem Name Suggestion Index den iD verwendet. 
Nehmen wir mal hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/955614017/history Du änderst den Operator von "Deutsche Post AG" auf "Deutsche Post" und fügst "operator:wikidata=Q157645" hinzu.
Der Wikidata Eintrag verweist aber auf den Namen "Deutsche Post AG". 
Ein Beispiel an der der NSI inkonsistent ist und m.E. zumindest beim Mappen kritisch hinterfragt werden sollte.

Gruß
tux67
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138027764
kjon (2023-07-10 20:05:59+00:00): Hallo tux67,
auf https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:operator wird empfohlen, die Rechtsform wegzulassen, da OSM kein Handelsregister ist. Wikipedia/Wikidata hat bzgl. Firmennamen eigene Regeln, die nicht unbedingt mit denen von OSM übereinstimmen müssen. In der Regel wird bei Wikipedia bzw. Wikidata die Rechtsform jedoch ebenfalls weggelassen.
Gruß, kjon
tux67 (2023-07-11 12:41:14+00:00): ok, danke - das erklärt die einzelne Unstimmigkeit ..
Zu meiner anderen Frage: bei den weiteren umfangreichen Anpassungen verlässt du dich auf die Vorschläge vom NSI?
kjon (2023-07-14 21:06:31+00:00): Hallo tux67,
die meisten Vorschläge, die via NSI im iD Validator angezeigt werden sind in der Tat einigermaßen trivial. Trotzdem stoße ich dadurch immer wieder auf größere Fehler oder Verbesserungspotential im Umkreis eines angezeigten Fehlers.

Was die einzelnen Vorschläge im NSI angeht, bin sehr bemüht, diese stetig zu verbessern, siehe https://github.com/osmlab/name-suggestion-index/commits?author=kjonosm
Sollten Dir falsche Vorschläge durch den NSI auffallen, melde den Fehler gerne direkt dort! Grüße, kjon
A Hall (2023-12-18 14:32:13+00:00): Heads up. The distinction between highway=residential and highway=track is a commonly confused distinction. These keys discuss USAGE, and not the quality of the road. highway=track should be used when the road is used to access land (like a farmer's field or a clearing in the woods for logging). Some of these roads you tagged here are used to access buildings (homes). 

Quality of the road can be captured with smoothness=*, width=* tracktype=*. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway
aTarom (2023-07-02 18:53:53+00:00): Hola dcapillae, gracias por editar, puede revisar el tag
"2019-06-05"="Mural representando a una joven con pelo y ojos pintados de color morado."
en
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11020337922/history
creo que es start_date la fecha, pero el valor no estoy seguro de añadirlo a description por ya estar presente.
Saludos cordiales
dcapillae (2023-07-02 18:56:27+00:00): Corregido. Gracias por el aviso.
Jordi MF (2023-07-03 14:48:47+00:00): Hola Estcanals,
Gràcies per milorar les dades d'OSM. He vist que has afegit una senda. Sobre el nom de la senda "Caracol" no he trobat referències en l'ICV ni en internet. Es tracta d'un nom utilitzat històricament per la població de Canals, hi ha alguna senyal que així ho indique o, en canvi, és el nom que utilitza el col·lectiu de ciclistes de BTT? Si és este últim cas, els noms de sendes i pistes s'han d'afegir en l'etiqueta mtb:name=* i no en name=*. Salutacions,
Jordi
impiaaa (2023-07-02 19:04:16+00:00): Anything that physically exists is allowed to be mapped, even if you're not allowed to use it. In these cases, consider access=no. I know it seems silly to try and maintain a routing network of inaccessible paths, but I could imagine for example an app that would find the nearest freeway refuge in emergencies.
Black_Diamond (2023-07-02 20:29:53+00:00): The stairs to road still exist. The non-existent “foot path” crossing lanes of the freeway were removed. I also marked it access private. It still connects to the off ramp.
impiaaa (2023-07-02 21:02:10+00:00): If the stairs are accessible from the freeway, they need to connect to the freeway in OSM too, even if it means an awkward crossing to the centerline. This ensures a proper routing network.
Black_Diamond (2023-07-03 04:22:08+00:00): If it's a foot path, access=no wouldn't work. Your argument also seems contradictory by saying that it should be marked with access=no, but still have it connected for a proper routing network.

In any case, I reconnected it, and marked it private. It shouldn't be used by normal lay people nor be proposed by apps for excessively trusting people to follow. It's obviously meant just for maintenance workers.
impiaaa (2023-07-03 05:12:05+00:00): access=no doesn't mean nobody at all can ever use it—otherwise, it wouldn't exist. It means it can't be generally used, but that can still allow for e.g. emergencies or maintenance workers.
highflyer74 (2023-07-03 18:25:27+00:00): Moin!

Kleiner Hinweis: ein area=yes ist bei einem Platz nicht notwendig (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:place=square).

Viele Grüße!
wies1 (2023-07-04 10:13:28+00:00): Hallo,
danke für den Hinweis.
Viele Grüße
wies1
NorthCrab_upload (2023-07-02 15:40:15+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2200317434
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/851929280

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
nurdafur (2023-07-10 19:12:29+00:00): Hallo Bächli

Schön, dass du vor kurzem mit Kartografieren begonnen hast.
In diesem Änderungssatz hast du an der Kreuzackerstrasse auf der nördlichen Seite einen Radweg, der nur durch eine gestrichelte Linie von der Fahrbahn getrennt ist, als separaten Weg eingetragen. 
Radwege die nur durch Farbe von der Fahrbahn getrennt sind, werden nie als eigene Wege gezeichnet. Dafür gibt es den key cycleway=*
Hier findest du Infos dazu:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway

Liebe Grüsse und weiterhin viel Spass beim Kartografieren
Urs
eggie (2023-07-12 21:04:59+00:00): Beste Bert   Zou je svp willen stoppen met het steeds weer vastmaken van vlakken aan wegen.
(Parallelweg. )
Het bewerken wordt dan lastig en bij verschuivingen komt alles mee. 
Het gaat ook tegen de afspraken in die we met elkaar hebben gemaakt binnen de OSM community.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-07-12 21:13:34+00:00): Ik heb de landuse residential weer losgemaakt van de weg. 
Het is mij een raadsel waarom je daarmee blijft doorgaan. 
MVG
eggie
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-02 10:00:56+00:00): is https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11020524795/history applying to entire https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/432774037 ?
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-11 04:50:32+00:00): send PM https://www.openstreetmap.org/messages/1326198
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-06-11 08:51:46+00:00): opened https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5168473 then waiting for check from some other surveyor
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-07-18 03:43:02+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/366431218/history

what kind of surface is there?

Flat-machined stone ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface%3Dpaving_stones ) ?

Is it cut stone but not entirely flat and not entirely covering surface? ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface%3Dsett )

Stone pieces, not flattened at all ? ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface%3Dunhewn_cobblestone )
scai (2023-07-18 05:07:29+00:00): Hi Mateusz,

thanks for your message.

These are large historical sandstone blocks which you can find everywhere around Dresden and the surrounding. Like these ones: https://www.historischebaustoffe-dresden.de/mauerbau/sandsteinbloecke.html

I don't think that any of the above categories do really fit. The closest would probably be sett with material=sandstone but I'm not really satisfied with this. What do you think?

Greetings
Alex
englu (2023-07-03 08:27:16+00:00): Co się stało z ulicą Akacjową w okolicach 52.476893, 21.046007? Zniknęła z mapy, a biegły tamtędy szlaki turystyczne - pieszy czerwony i rowerowy żółty.
lasica1982 (2023-07-03 12:57:59+00:00): Wczoraj jechałem tamtędy rowerem i zobaczyłem płot a za nim plac budowy, ale nie przyglądałem się co tam robią. Przypuszczam że skoro po jednej stronie jest szkoła a po drugiej nowy kompleks sportowy (chyba jeszcze nie oddany do użytku) to obie części złączono w spójną całość.
englu (2023-07-03 15:57:45+00:00): Dzięki za odpowiedź.
Frans S (2023-07-03 14:26:04+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project 
Please don't use the tag footway in rural areas.
About tagging of highways
Please read and follow the tagging rules on this linked document.
Decision tree, which tag to be used for roads
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1S48CEVi3yiAYWhIJu57jtLyv0ZVUbGwJ/view?usp=share_link
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/East_Africa_Tagging_Guidelines
or
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa

--------------------------------------
Tag highway=Path rather than footway/	Paths are usually impassable for motorised vehicles. (However, African motorcyclists can sometimes do the most improbable stunts.)  Never use path to mark an unpaved or unsealed road in built-up residential areas: Such roads should be tagged according to the local conventions (usually highway=residential if passable by vehicles and pedestrians, or highway=footway for pedestrian only where they can sometimes be separated from another parallel highway for vehicles).
----------------------------
 How to measure the width of a road in IDeditor:
Zoom in as far as possible and draw a line between the shoulders of a trace and click
ctr +shift+M to shows measurements
click on the line between the nodes, and you get the width.
Best regards
Argbjorn (2023-07-02 17:06:55+00:00): Hi, 11daf. There's already Shua Kalaki. May be you'll just update the old one?
11daf (2023-07-04 06:40:24+00:00): Hi!
Merged duplicate POIs
rskedgell (2023-07-02 19:15:09+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I'm afraid that your edit dragged several nodes on buildings and roads quite a way out of position.

Although I'm not familiar with the Rapid editor, I'd be happy to help you with the changes you were trying to make, if I can.

No harm done, I've reverted your changes in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138035798
NorthCrab_upload (2023-07-02 16:50:13+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/316715901

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
WieKo68 (2024-06-11 17:38:40+00:00): poprawione
UtterClutter (2023-07-02 19:33:23+00:00): Thanks for that. I'll do the house numbers  on Roundhill Crescent soon.
Kovoschiz (2023-07-03 11:11:26+00:00): Please don't add direct translations to `name=` and `name:en=`. The names must be in common public use.
gurglypipe (2023-07-02 22:16:47+00:00): Hi, I don’t know what app you’re using to route, but it’s the app which is at fault here, not the previous access tagging.

The foot=designated tag should override access=private to allow foot routing. access=private sets the defaults, and is needed to ensure that the track is not considered as a public road for vehicles.

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access#Road_where_residents,_pedestrians_and_cyclists_are_allowed
swhite7000 (2023-07-03 10:31:13+00:00): OpenRouteService and LocusMap both fail to route. The wiki states vehicle=private not access=private.
gurglypipe (2023-07-03 22:42:07+00:00): See other parts of the same page: access= is used to set the default access for the way. For example, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access#Transport_mode_restrictions

I suspect something else is going on, because OpenRouteService seems happy to use https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/26487015 for pedestrian routing, for example, and it has access=private foot=designated. See https://maps.openrouteservice.org/#/directions/Keldwyth%20Drive,Windermere,England,United%20Kingdom/Wynlass%20Park,Windermere,England,United%20Kingdom/data/55,130,32,198,15,97,4,224,38,9,96,59,2,24,5,192,166,6,113,0,184,64,90,0,152,3,160,19,128,70,0,89,200,13,134,202,5,96,1,153,167,40,3,157,129,216,1,160,114,226,1,153,73,55,174,74,151,114,21,42,8,13,196,76,185,38,229,6,20,164,221,149,66,76,70,11,224,48,123,26,237,40,142,227,43,160,193,32,120,128,128,1,213,60,8,137,176,229,0,11,202,0,91,92,229,120,131,219,64,64,1,155,192,0,219,162,224,128,133,66,163,224,0,91,192,3,89,32,3,152,218,7,67,160,135,163,102,33,129,69,227,102,67,123,123,162,34,195,162,192,128,2,250,213,0,0
silversurfer83 (2023-07-02 18:23:58+00:00): Hi :)
Du hast darum gebeten, dass sich jemand diese Änderung ansieht. Ehrlich gesagt weiß ich nicht, was ich mir da ansehe, da du keinen Kommentar hinterlassen hast und einfach eine wackelige Linie ohne Eigenschaften in die Landschaft gelegt hast.

Ich habe gesehen, dass du öfter keinen Kommentar hinterlässt. Das ist allgemein sehr schade und daher möchte ich dir noch diesen Artikel im Wiki ans Herz legen:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138031583
BikeMapper2000 (2023-07-02 18:44:02+00:00): Hallo, Danke für deine Rückmeldung. Ich habe erst vor kurzem Angefangen. In Zukunft werde ich darauf achten einen Kommentar zu hinterlassen. Was meine Änderung angeht hierbei handelt es sich um einen schmalen Pfad der neben dem eigentlichen Radweg verläuft zur Schleuse. Ich war mir nicht sicher ob dies in OpenStreet map aufgenommen werden sollte
BikeMapper2000 (2023-07-02 18:46:09+00:00): Leider scheint der Standort über GPS manchmal etwas ungenau zu sein weshalb ich mir manchmal nicht sicher bin ob der Standort korrekt ist. Ich würde vorschlagen die Änderung erstmal zu verwerfen ggf. kann ich mir den Weg morgen nochmal anschauen.