piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisRevert (2025-12-11 22:02:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/175822006
where the comment is: "Revert of unintended geometry change"
シゲシゲ (2025-12-13 08:33:44+00:00): Thank you for your comment.
I wanted to add points for the store,
but I ended up making many other changes as well.
I apologize.
Thank you for reverting it back to the original.

I am currently studying how to make changes on the OSM wiki pages.
Frans S (2025-12-11 13:53:37+00:00): * Please map individual buildings without collecting multiple nearby buildings into a single object.
 * Please accurately outline all buildings.
 * Buildings should be mapped without snapping their corners to other buildings and features such as roads and paths.
 * Buildings should have their corners squared.
rskedgell (2025-12-11 11:45:32+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for adding your business. I've converted the tags which you used to ones which are more likely to be recognised by data consumers.

It may be worth taking a look at the list of documented service types on the wiki and adding those which are missing. I've only added service:vehicle:towing=yes
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:service:vehicle:*
NeisBot (2025-12-14 07:57:49+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Vehicle recovery service in Oxfordshire"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
kingkingHK (2025-12-11 12:15:12+00:00): Isn't it a `short_name`? Afaik `loc_name` basically means a nickname that only people from a certain small area (usually the area around the object) knows about.
NeisBot (2025-12-14 07:57:50+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Travel agency in Qatar"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
user_23600898 (2025-12-14 08:12:16+00:00): Travel agency in Qatar
user_23600898 (2025-12-14 08:25:03+00:00): Revised, neutral, OSM-compliant description that avoids promotional or SEO-style wording and stays factual and concise.
pitscheplatsch (2025-12-14 14:06:22+00:00): Thanks for your reply. Where can I find your revised description?
user_23600898 (2025-12-14 14:15:38+00:00): Revised Description - Gulf Tourist & Travel (GTT), serving since 1981, is a leading Qatar travel agency for air tickets, hotel bookings, holiday packages, family and group tours, cruises, visas, insurance, IDL services, and customized itineraries for seamless travel
Frans S (2025-12-11 13:15:59+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
About tagging of buildings. 
Default tagging is building=yes. Nothing else. 
Local mappers will add additional taggings.
I removed the namings.
Please map more accurately and square your buildings.
Best regards
Frans S (2025-12-11 13:23:00+00:00): Hello. Again.
After noticing how inaccurate and sloppy your mappings are, I decided to remove all of them. Remapping takes less time than repairing everything.

Sorry. It can't be helped.

Quality prevails above quantity!!
rjaksic (2025-12-12 12:30:07+00:00): I believe "amenity=plater" is supposed to be a "planter"?
Anyway, they are not really amenities and are usually tagged as man_made=planter, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dplanter
YomanNH (2025-12-11 20:55:08+00:00): Hej,
tag "name" to miejsce na nazwę obiektu, a nie jego opis. Tężnia solankowa nie nazywa się "Tężnia solankowa". Nie ma ona też adresu. Oprócz tego połączyłeś ławkę z łąką.

Poprawiłem wszystkie błędy.
Frans S (2025-12-11 13:27:09+00:00): Bad shaped buildings removed.
fortera_au (2025-12-11 22:20:08+00:00): The colon should be before the two slashes, I'll correct it for you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175790635
b-jazz (2025-12-12 05:06:36+00:00): How embarrassing. I've done thousands of these edits. I must have been lacking sleep for this edit. My apologies.
fortera_au (2025-12-12 05:08:52+00:00): All good, it happens!
jengelh (2026-01-05 22:10:24+00:00): Du hast hier in cs 175790821 die Grenze nach ALKIS neugezeichnet und dabei von den tatsächlich erfassten Grenzsteinen (z.B. node 6775570746, "G10") abgetrennt. Die Sammlung an Steinen mit G-Eingravierung (Göttingen; eine Seite) und D-Eingravierung (andere Seite des Steins; Diemarden) zeugen von der tatsächlichen Grenze, und stimmen, minus der Ungenauigkeit meines GPS-Telefons von ±3m, eigentlich recht gut mit den in ALKIS hinterlegten runden Nodes überein. Wie am besten mit der Situation umgehen? Steine verschieben? Grenze zurückverschieben?

(Das hat erstmal nichts mit der kürzlich kommunizierten Situation um Stein "72E", node 8665773283, zu tun -- das wird wohl ein Waldparzellenmarker gewesen sein)
EneaSuper (2025-12-11 09:18:07+00:00): Ciao, temo ci sia qualche problema tecnico con l'edificio con al suo interno il Lidl...
camminatoreseriale (2025-12-11 09:47:14+00:00): Hmm spiegami un po’, :-) intendi che è tutto un blocco unico da separare o che l’app ha fatto casotto? (Non aggiorna istantaneamente i nodi e a volte si sovrappone)
EneaSuper (2025-12-11 10:31:00+00:00): Praticamente l'edificio non viene renderizzato e, da quel poco che riesco a capire attualmente, pare essere composto da due pezzi, non so se mi spiego...
camminatoreseriale (2025-12-11 15:22:45+00:00): Sistemato da computer. Quella belina dell’app l’aveva splittato e trasformato in una way, in sostanza. Grazie dell’occhio vigile
EneaSuper (2025-12-11 18:49:15+00:00): Di nulla, ciao e auguri!
kingkingHK (2025-12-11 12:13:32+00:00): 1. Are you sure they are simply "Student Health Service Centre" and "Special Assessment Centre" with no "Chai Wan" prefix? See changeset discussion of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174721133

2. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/777216821 should probably be `landuse=healthcare` or `=institutional` and not `amenity=clinic`.
vectorial8192 (2025-12-11 14:02:36+00:00): Re 1, also see discussion of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174721133

Re 2, it seems we do not have clear consensus of what values to use.
kingkingHK (2025-12-11 14:15:01+00:00): 1. Yes, that's what I linked, I have expressed my views there am I am still awaiting your response after 24 days.

2. I think at least we can have a consensus that it is not `amenity=clinic` or `healthcare=clinic` due to the duplication problem.
vectorial8192 (2025-12-11 14:27:53+00:00): Re 1, in case you missed it, from the same quoted discussion:

> that would be for another changeset and for separate survey/lookup work.

Re 2: I will not act until there is an obvious and uncontested replacement.
kingkingHK (2025-12-12 10:08:34+00:00): 1. > The government websites include "Yau Ma Tei" https://www.info.gov.hk/tb_chest/tb-chi/contents/c614_1July2007.htm https://www.dh.gov.hk/english/tele/tele_chc/tele_chc_shcf.html https://www.dh.gov.hk/english/tele/tele_chc/tele_chc_shcm.html

I think we can simply believe in the website. Quoting you from https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3209599, "I don't think you need a survey for this. If the (official!) website contains wrong data then it's entirely their problem and we have no obligation to help them clean it up."

2. Understandable. But then, `=clinic` is an obviously wrong tagging, and with how few people are seemingly interested in this topic, I don't think you can ever find an obvious and uncontested replacement without more attention. Maybe post on the forum?
騎貢丸上學 (2025-12-11 08:44:11+00:00): 打錯了，是復興北路地下道
NeisBot (2025-12-11 08:49:37+00:00): Hi KBadi, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 90% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 4 barrier(s)
- 32 highway(s)
- 2 landuse(s)
- 4 name(s)
- 4 surface(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=175791744
KBadi (2025-12-11 08:55:43+00:00): I confirm it is correct change.
pitscheplatsch (2025-12-11 09:18:38+00:00): Hi KBadi,

Thank you very much for your reply. May we know the source of your mapping activity? All available satellite imagery still shows the data you removed.

Best regards,
Pascal
NeisRevert (2025-12-12 08:24:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/175834733
where the comment is: "Reverted data due to lack of response from the original contributor"
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-01-27 22:54:22+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4226430340/history has id = 26 that was added in this edit
What is the meaning of this unusual key? Is this tag needed?
Or maybe can it be expressed in a more typical way that would be easier to understand?
Or maybe this key can and should be documented as useful tagging schema?
pwbriggs (2025-12-12 00:03:29+00:00): I think you meant to use a lifecycle prefix? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

I changed this to razed:building=roof but let me know if you had building=razed for a reason.
Natfoot (2025-12-12 08:57:21+00:00): its the old way of doing it. I have been around the block to long.
pwbriggs (2025-12-13 07:41:40+00:00): No problem :)

Happy mapping!
NeisBot (2025-12-14 07:57:52+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Indian restaurant near Colleyville and Dallas TX"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
eggie (2025-12-11 09:37:09+00:00): Dag Gijsbert.. 

algemeen access=private houdt alles al tegen.

Kwaad kan het natuurlijk niet als je het aanvult. 

MVG
eggie
yetzt (2025-12-11 11:33:09+00:00): oops, thank you!
Rom1 (2025-12-11 10:08:43+00:00): L'attribut layer n'est pas adapté dans ce cas de figure. C'est bien level qu'il convient d'utiliser ;) Merci !
rempshaener (2025-12-14 18:33:33+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.
Eine Anmerkung zu deinen Bearbeitungen:
Das, was jetzt als name eingetragen ist, gehört – ohne das „H“ – in fire_hydrant:diameter
Wenn du Hilfe brauchst: einfach melden.
Vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag und weiterhin viel Spaß beim Mappen.
Viele Grüße
Jbell4588 (2025-12-12 23:35:01+00:00): Both lines are separate because they originate from different docks in Kingston, even though they both arrive at the same dock in Edmonds. In OSM, each ferry route is mapped separately if the start or end points differ, because each represents a distinct service or schedule. 
Imagine if you were navigating from the Kingston terminal, and the only ferry you saw was leaving from a different dock than the Edmonds route was shown to depart from. This would cause some worry and confusion about if it was the correct route for travel to Edmonds.
Of course, with the current construction, who knows how this will change.
Does that help answer the question?
Thanks for being part of the mapping community!
Natfoot (2025-12-13 00:04:48+00:00): Please support the note in puget sound if you can.
jengelh (2025-12-12 11:25:46+00:00): Megageil. Aber dann hab ich trotzdem mal mit Overpass nach Fehlern geschaut und gefunden:

node 8665773283 wurde durch cs 175792948 geändert.
Auch wenn die Lage des Stein-Nodes selber gewissen Ungenauigkeiten unterliegt, so ist es doch ein Fehler, sie von einer Straßenseite auf die andere zu verfrachten.
Ropino (2025-12-12 12:42:14+00:00): Hi,
Danke fürs prüfen/checken.
lt. ALKIS könnte es sich eher um Ungenauigkeiten bei der Lage der Wegpunkte 2142838605 / 3376411444 handeln. 
Leider auf Luftbild(ern) nur schwer erkennbar.
Wenn diese beiden Node ca. 3 Meter weiter nordwestlich liegen würden, passte der Weg zu ALKIS und auch der Grenzstein wäre wieder auf der anderen Seite...
jengelh (2025-12-12 14:38:49+00:00): Ich habe weiter recherchiert. Geh mal zu node 2142838616/node 8664659657 (Glombitza-Bank) und lass dir den AP2.5-Layer anzeigen. Was fällt auf? Die Borheckstraße ist im AP eine Linie die ca. 20px dicke pastellgelb mit 6px dick grauem Casing.

Abseits davon die 50px breite pastellgelbe Linie/Fläche mit 1px dickem grauen Rand, die direkt an der pinken Admingrenze klebt. Damit sollte klar werden, dass die 50px breite Linie nur rudimentär mit der Wegeposition korreliert.
Ropino (2025-12-13 17:46:00+00:00): Die groben Klotzgrafiken des AP2.5-Layer sind nicht so mein Ding.
Ich habe den Stein wieder an die vorherige Position gesetzt.
eggie (2025-12-11 09:45:47+00:00): Dag Stockbaard. Je vraagt feedback. Lijkt me oke zo.

MVG
eggie
Nine-tailed (2025-12-15 22:19:51+00:00): Вы зачем создали эти заведения, они же уже есть на карте? Да ещё и создали не там, где они в торговом центре находятся.
Aristarh L (2025-12-15 23:36:02+00:00): Случайно - замапил чёрт знает когда (ещё и криво, ага),  и оставил правки в everydoor. А потом выгрузил их вместе с какой-то другой правкой. Есть способ откатить правку целиком?
Nine-tailed (2025-12-15 23:39:40+00:00): Понятно. Завтра откачу.
Aristarh L (2025-12-16 23:16:19+00:00): Спасибо большое!
__doge (2025-12-19 19:46:32+00:00): Hello, why was this deleted? This is distinct from the more geometric cosmodrome relation---whereas the geometric relation shows the bounds of the facilities of the cosmodrome, the circular relation deleted here shows the actual lease area as legally defined in the agreement between Russia and Kazakhstan---not excess or redundant, but showing the legal lease boundary vs the approximate area used of the cosmodrome facility.
TrickyFoxy (2025-12-19 20:57:01+00:00): Please provide a link to the official documents where this zone is defined. I can believe in its existence, but you clearly made a mistake in using tags.
NatalieVvln (2025-12-13 17:02:47+00:00): Наложение зданий (где Конечный переулок, 8)
addr: (2025-12-13 21:56:48+00:00): Спасибо, исправил
habi (2026-01-19 20:01:09+00:00): Ciao PDQS
Hier hast du das KiSpi als https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1457725124 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13369136998 doppelt erfasst.
Ich hab das in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177445256 dedupliziert.
Gruss,
Habi
bxl-forever (2025-12-11 11:31:04+00:00): Hello,

The changeset description does not mention it but, apart from roads and landuse areas, you edited no less than 1,274 trees. Congrats for that big survey, if any.

One tree in the changeset is near Antwerp (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2053260384), in the north of the country whereas the rest of the changeset is in Genappe, in the south.  We would have appreciated to see this as separate changesets.

Have a nice day.
el_emka (2025-12-11 11:59:19+00:00): Good afternoon, 

I'm sorry. That shouldn't have happened. I just wanted to select all trees in view (actually a golf course near Genappe, where all these trees were already mapped and I wanted to add the leaf type info, as all of them are broadleaved according to the aerials and photos). Apparently the selection was not bounded by the current view, so that's my bad and it shouldn't happen again.
habi (2026-01-19 19:33:56+00:00): Ciao PDQS
Du hast hier beim Haus 7A (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1391019767/history) den Wert `building=yes` entfernt, so wird das Ding nicht mehr auf der Karte dargestellt.
Ich hab' mal `building=hospital` wieder drangehängt.
Gruss aus Bern
Habi

PS: Ich bin hier wegen https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5131008
reigi (2025-12-11 13:51:08+00:00): Hallo Nordmyra, mir ist aufgefallen, dass du u.a. den Tag "width" auf diesem Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/99500072/history/6 gelöscht hast. Darf ich fragen was dich bei diesem Merkmal stört, dass du es löschst?
viele Grüße
reigi
reigi (2025-12-11 13:57:02+00:00): Sorry, hier der direkte Link zum Weg: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/99500072
Fraxi (2025-12-11 15:48:23+00:00): Ако обичате, върнете промените по храма от тази насетне! Първо, като отворите англо-българския речник и напишете "храм", излизат няколко думи:"temple","shrine","church". Последната се използва в OSM. И то като тип сграда. Има и building=temple. Но ако прочетете в https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temple, там пише следното:
"Religions whose places of worship are generally not called "temples" in English include Christianity, which has churches," и т.н. Ето и за църквата(сграда) - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Church_(building). Иначе аз знам какво означава "еклесия"...
Второ - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1457733160/ и съседните му сегменти от тухла с каква цел са?    Това ли е търсения ефект на картата, който се е получил? И в самите части на сградата на места хем има building:part, хем building.
Anonymous36863 (2025-12-11 18:35:01+00:00): "Ако обичате, върнете промените по храма от тази насетне" 

Благодаря Ви за съветът, но можете да прочетете fixme и да се опитате да оправите храмът, вместо да се оплаквате. Мисля, че промените ми могат да са по-добри от оригиналният храм, след като се оправят.
Fraxi (2025-12-12 08:15:54+00:00): Значи, за тестови цели, мисля, че имаше някакъв друг сайт api.openstreetmap.org или нещо такова. А не тук да си играете. Имайте предвид, че тези данни се използват след определено време в много софтуерни приложения, а и самата база данни с carto слоя се използва и от институции или фирми.  Важно е данните в OSM да бъдат точни и удостоверими, а не с тяхното вкарване да целим определена визуализация (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bg:Lying_to_the_renderer). Можете да видите и https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice. 
Не мисля, че се "оплаквам". Аз щях да върна данните, ако Митко не го беше направил.
Fraxi (2025-12-12 08:26:22+00:00): Вярно е, че има примери като катедралата във Варна - https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/43.205210/27.909919. ам 3D  ефектът е много добър. Но не е това целта на OSM. Разгледайте я в редактора. Тези, които са допринесли за този вид, трябва да са знаели какво правят и са внимавали. Също, аз  лично гледам да внимавам или дори избягвам да "пипам" храмовете и параклисите в OSM, ако ме разбирате.
NeisBot (2025-12-14 07:57:54+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Law firm in Georgia"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-12-16 17:29:43+00:00): 🔴 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the original contributor or remaining promotional text in description tags by https://osm.org/changeset/176016511
Aethonatic (2025-12-11 10:59:09+00:00): surface=tarmac? Did you mean surface=asphalt?
ninesevenoh (2025-12-11 18:52:02+00:00): yes sorry
AnteŽunić (2025-12-11 10:47:07+00:00): According source:hgv tags were added in changeset 175727274 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175727274#map=14/34.68979/-86.60982&layers=N
eggie (2025-12-11 10:45:54+00:00): Dag Peter,

Goed om zaken actueel te maken.
Meestal is er een uitzondering voor tweewielers bij eenrichtingsverkeer.
Is dat hier het geval. Dan toevoegen oneway:bicycle=no en evt ook voor mofa en moped.
Dan routeert het weer goed voot tweewielers.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-12-11 10:48:54+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback.. De info heb ik verpaatst naar de adresnode conform tagging in OSM.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
maraf24 (2025-12-13 19:21:09+00:00): Wycofałem.
eggie (2025-12-11 11:00:14+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback De school stond er twee keer op. Ik heb de schoolinfo van de gebouwomtrek verwijderd en jouw info samengevoegd met de adresnode.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Ondřej Lopatka (2026-01-09 10:22:08+00:00): je opravdu way/1457744200 jinde než na satelitních snímcích? Tzn. je značen severně od satelitních snímků
vojtechzaboril (2026-01-09 10:28:12+00:00): Probíhala tam rekonstrukce asi 3 křižovatek (a již skončila, podle toho co jsem našel). Pozici přechodu jsem zkontroloval v projektové dokumentaci a odpovídá to tomuto místu.
V
Ondřej Lopatka (2026-01-09 10:30:59+00:00): Díky
eggie (2025-12-11 11:05:09+00:00): Top!
TinPetreković (2025-12-12 07:43:48+00:00): The node that was accidentally created has been removed in changeset 175806725 since it served no real purpose.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175806725
rskedgell (2025-12-11 11:30:02+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Thanks for adding this, but Buckland Primary School has been in OSM since 2012.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/162902344
Ltrlg (2025-12-11 12:08:27+00:00): J’apprécie l’utilisation du préfixe `contact:` (mais tout le monde ne sera pas d’accord). Cependant je préférerais que les données ne soient pas présentes en doublon entre la version préfixée et la version non préfixée, comme `phone` ici.
Andrea Musuruane (2025-12-11 14:19:58+00:00): Ciao. In Italia i numeri civici non vanno mai messi sugli edifici. Il numero civico è il numero che contraddistingue l'accesso esterno che dall’area di circolazione (strada, piazza, via, ecc) immette direttamente o indirettamente alle unità immobiliari (abitazioni, esercizi commerciali, uffici, garage, ecc.) o alle aree recintate non edificate (es. stabilimenti balneari). Non è quindi corretto associare i tag addr:* a un edificio. Bisogna quindi inserire un nodo in corrispondenza dell'ingresso dove si trova la targhetta ed etichettalo opportunamente. Ciao, Andrea
AnteŽunić (2025-12-11 11:03:29+00:00): According source tags were added in changeset 175736402 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175736402#map=15/34.69017/-86.57576&layers=N
Max-Kritic (2025-12-20 10:44:07+00:00): Il y aussi un sens de circulation pour les piétons ?
Matthieu HUGOT (2026-01-07 10:19:27+00:00): De chaque coté le marquage piéton est orienté dans le même sens que celui du vélo mais dans la pratique on voit des piétons aller et venir dans les deux sens des deux cotés
Max-Kritic (2026-02-03 18:20:55+00:00): Donc, il faut mettre oneway:bicycle et pas oneway sur les higway=path

J'ai corrigé
Max-Kritic (2026-02-03 18:22:36+00:00): j'ai corrigé au niveau du giratoire RD941 - RD947

Avec PCRS Raster, on voit mieux la qualité des aménagements cyclables.
Max-Kritic (2026-02-03 18:40:43+00:00): Tu connais aussi Osmose ?
Matthieu HUGOT (2026-02-04 08:29:09+00:00): Ok, je vais regarder PCRS Raster et Osmose
Max-Kritic (2025-12-12 05:44:38+00:00): Encore deux segments à corriger SVP. Du côté giratoire.
xcazin (2025-12-12 10:06:18+00:00): Merci, mais je n'en n'ai vu qu'un seul restant : Chemin 1149398592
hatul (2025-12-12 07:21:16+00:00): שלום וברוך הבא ל-osm
אני רואה שיצרת את הבניין על בניין קיים. אם אתה רוצה להחליף אז מחק את הבניין הקודם.
בנוסף כדאי לתייג אותו בתור בית כנסת ולתת לו שם.
dima monsky (2025-12-12 13:27:14+00:00): תודה לך סליחה אני פעם הראשונה עשיתי משהו צריך זמן ללמוד