piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-03 12:12:53+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Skrajna":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13190555897
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13190577002
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13190577003
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13190577004
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13190577005
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13190577006
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13190577011

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-03 12:23:24+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Skrajna":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13190555897
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13190577002
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13190577003
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13190577004
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13190577005
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13190577006
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13190577011

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-03 12:33:25+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Skrajna":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13190555897
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13190577002
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13190577003
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13190577004
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13190577005
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13190577006
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13190577011

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
maro21 (2025-10-03 12:45:16+00:00): Raz wystarczy napisać.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-03 12:53:28+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Skrajna":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13190555897
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13190577002
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13190577003
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13190577004
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13190577005
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13190577006
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13190577011

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-03 13:03:27+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Skrajna":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13190555897
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13190577002
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13190577003
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13190577004
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13190577005
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13190577006
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13190577011

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-03 13:13:29+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Skrajna":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13190555897
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13190577002
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13190577003
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13190577004
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13190577005
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13190577006
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13190577011

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-03 13:23:30+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Skrajna":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13190555897
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13190577002
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13190577003
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13190577004
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13190577005
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13190577006
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13190577011

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2025-10-03 18:59:13+00:00): highway=pedestrian olarak değiştirdiğiniz yolun Viki'de tarif edildiği gibi olmadığını düşünüyorum. Bu yola araçların giremediğini belirtmek için OpenStreetMap'te başka etiketler var. Ki uydu görüntüerine bakılırsa araçlar da kaldırım taşını aşıp güneyden bu sokağa girebiliyorlar gibi görünüyor.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpedestrian 

Bu yol için, araçların geçemediği kaldırımları barrier=kerb ile eklemek daha uygun olabilir. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:barrier
victory45 (2025-10-03 19:24:23+00:00): Yolun iki tarafı kaldırım, tek tarafından bazı araçlar girebiliyor ama çıkışı yok, Bariyeri gördüm ama bi tarafına ekleyemedim, normalde araçların girmemesi gerektiğinden yol aslında sadece yaya yolu. Yorumunuz için teşekkürler.
A67-A67 (2025-10-05 19:27:33+00:00): Hoi,
Je voegt de winkel hier toe op 1-hoog i.p.v. op de begane grond. Het huisnummer voor de begane grond eindigt in Amsterdam op -H.
SomeoneElse2 (2025-10-03 12:27:59+00:00): (based on the imagery)
acubens71 (2025-10-05 13:39:09+00:00): Bonjour,
Vous continuez de créer des multipolygones à 1 membre.. faites attention quand vous éditez, merci
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2025-10-03 13:17:08+00:00): 朋友，我注意到你的编辑的comment就只有内容编辑啊道路更改啊之类的非常统括性的什么意义都没有的内容，这样的话虽然看着整齐但是实际上对别人了解到你编辑了什么是完全没有帮助的，请考虑用更能介绍自己在一个changeset里面做了什么的内容来作为变更集changeset的comment
IvaKraljić (2025-10-08 01:53:28+00:00): Reverted the changeset because of an unnecessary split. #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172982457
eggie (2025-10-03 12:44:06+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedsback  Het adres heb ik weer verwijderd. Er is al een adresnode.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
LodewijkF (2025-10-03 12:57:33+00:00): Hi eggie, ik heb je bericht gelezen, thanks voor de tips en het checken van mijn wijziging :).

groetjes Lodewijk
rempshaener (2025-10-05 18:14:45+00:00): Hallo,
folgende Anmerkung zu deinen Bearbeitungen:
Das Feld "couplings" bleibt bei Unterflurhydranten leer, da es sich um die „Angabe der vorhandenen Anzahl an Schlauchanschlüssen“ handelt, siehe osm.wiki/DE:Key:couplings?uselang=de. Unterflurhydranten haben in der Regel nur mit Standrohr eine Schlauchkupplung.
Viele Grüße
LSTR-256 (2025-10-06 04:59:30+00:00): Hey,
danke für den Hinweis, das habe ich wohl leider übersehen.
nevw (2025-10-05 01:48:34+00:00): Hi, multipolygon relations cannot have outers that share sides and are easiest to map with simple polygons instead.
Our wiki has valid and invalid examples… 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon
fortera_au (2025-10-05 23:13:55+00:00): Can you please leave a more descriptive changeset comment than just Edits, a brief explanation of what you did is all that's needed.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172790222
frydzio (2025-10-04 09:29:35+00:00): Nie powinno być 'fire_path' zamiast 'fire_track'?
frydzio (2025-10-04 09:29:59+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:fire_path%3Dyes
Sylabowy Kot (2025-10-04 09:44:40+00:00): O cholera xD Dzięki za zwrócenie uwagi.
dp7 (2025-10-03 14:59:53+00:00): Ciao Francesca, grazie per il tuo contributo, però attenzione: l'abbazia di Roti era già mappata ! :)
nickvet419 (2026-07-14 20:28:32+00:00): aeroway=parking_position should only be used to mark the parking line or point. not an area.
custodiankeyy (2025-10-03 18:31:20+00:00): Eklediğiniz yerde gerçekten de bir otel bulunuyor mu?
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2025-10-03 19:36:26+00:00): Merhaba. İşaretlediğiniz noktada gerçekten 3.İstanbul adında bir otel var mı? Yoksa bir toplu yapıyı(siteyi) yanlışlıkla otel olarak mı işaretlediniz?
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2025-10-03 19:39:29+00:00): Bazı değişiklikleri ayrı ayrı sekmelerde açmış, bu arada başka bir işle ilgilenmiştim. Sayfayı yenilemeden yorum yazdığım için sayın @custodiankeyy'in yorumunu o nedenle görmemişim. Aynı şeyi ikinci defa sormuş oldum. Kusura bakmayınız.
gurglypipe (2025-10-04 09:39:40+00:00): Hiya, are you sure this is right? https://www.rosegrovecaravanpark.com/ makes it look like Rose Grove still exists, and https://bridlingtoncaravans.com/sandy-bay-caravan-park.html has a different address for Sandy Bay.

Looking at the aerial imagery, it looks like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/182054674 could actually be two caravan parks. Is one of them actually Rose Grove or Sandy Bay?

Where are you getting your information from? You should always add a source to your changesets as it helps people check each others’ work. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source

Thanks
gurglypipe (2025-10-17 00:15:36+00:00): Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173387985 using Bing Streetside imagery and the parks’ websites.
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2025-10-03 19:17:05+00:00): Merhaba. Köy içindeki yolları highway=residential'dan highway=tertiary'e çevirmişsiniz. Bunun doğru olduğuna emin misiniz?

Bkz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tr:Turkey_roads_tagging
victory45 (2025-10-03 19:40:10+00:00): Merhaba, birebir tanıdığım bir bölge olduğundan, köyün ortasından geçen yol ile aynı seviyeye getirmek amacıyla yapıldı.
dintrans_g (2025-10-08 13:31:50+00:00): Highway is not yet completed, it´s estimated completion date is by the second half of 2028.
jplahti (2025-10-20 20:50:53+00:00): Just a note here that the source is over ten years old now and parts of the line has been resignalled. I think it would be a good idea to put in a request for newer version the document.
Vas111 (2025-10-21 08:19:23+00:00): Thank you for letting me know, I realised after seeing new signals from satellite imagery. I added the old signals for now.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-12-07 03:57:48+00:00): This changeset incorrectly reversed the direction of a highway https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/174835914/history
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172793172
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-12-07 03:59:10+00:00): Fixed
manjurawat_Lyft (2025-12-11 04:58:31+00:00): 
Hi Spaghetti Monster,

My name is Manju, and I'm a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. Many thanks for letting me know & correcting my errors. I split the roads & didn’t notice the direction of the way. 
Sorry for that & for any inconvenience these edits may have caused. Please accept my apologies. I’ll be more cautious when pushing changesets up. 

Best Regards,
Manju
nevw (2025-10-05 23:22:01+00:00): Hi, osmi picks this error up... broken relation...
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=139.90413&lat=-16.80859&zoom=9

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=172793320

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13106483#map=9/-16.898/139.100
wadenick (2025-10-03 14:06:53+00:00): I suspect these features have issues with the water_hazard tags, they are now showing up on the map as much larger areas than in reality.
VLD549 (2025-10-25 05:38:15+00:00): Hi, I was asked to verify name changes. Could you provide a link of some sort that shows the name to be  Natuurdomein Spildoorn Vijver? I can't find it.
Thank you.
MassCartog (2025-10-03 16:17:20+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM! Nice work! Just a heads-up, if you are going to make edits in two areas that are very far apart, it's better to break them up into 2 changesets.

Edits like this get flagged for many people who are monitoring changes in smaller areas that happen to be inside the massive bounding box you created here.
Tatfahren (2025-10-03 15:35:31+00:00): Du hast mit neun scheinbar unnötigen Objektversionen die Stromleitung gelöscht. War das Absicht oder ein versehen?
Marsgame (2025-10-03 17:04:55+00:00): Ja das war ein versehen. Wollte nur den tag "pole" hinzufügen da mir eine Fehlermeldung angezeigt wurde und das als fix vorgeschlagen wurde. Mein fehler, hoffe das er nicht zu starke Unannehmlichkeiten verursacht hat.
Tatfahren (2025-10-14 15:56:22+00:00): Wieder hinzugefügt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173283095
eggie (2025-10-03 15:25:26+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
eedback  access=no betekent Verboden Toegang.  Wanneer dat niet staat aangegeven kun je dat beter niet taggen. Dat geldy ook voor foot=no
smoothness=impassable zou voldoende moeten zijn.
Wanneer er niets meer van een pad te zien is dan kun je disused:highway=path 
taggen. Dan zie je het pad niet meer op de kaart en voorkomt opnieuw intekenen.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eagle314 (2025-12-20 21:38:11+00:00): Ciao, questa strada non esiste o mi sbaglio? Cosa volevi fare?
maro21 (2025-12-14 21:25:59+00:00): Usunąłeś budynek https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100511045
proszę o przywrócenie
jcrow (2025-11-05 09:51:52+00:00): Hi Hassan - Can I can where you are getting your data for Sudan's districts? I'm not saying you've made an error, I just can't find any up-to-date info online. Thanks!
Hassan Arara (2025-11-06 22:49:05+00:00): Hello, Jcrow thanks for asking  I added boundaries according to old government localities division, but recently 2021 they combined some localities 
so if you want to add on Wikipedia add Bundisi, Mukjar, Um Dukhun, Wadi Salih, Azoum, Zalingei and North Jabel Marra then leave others we will do it later 
and thanks, you added West Darfur to Wikipedia and if you have another question do net hesitate to ask me
Hassan Arara (2025-11-06 23:02:58+00:00): I have confirmed so you can add  West Jabel Marra, Central Jabel Marra and I am going to remove Abata and Garsila
jcrow (2025-11-11 10:48:46+00:00): Thanks Hassan! Yes, the district boundaries are outdated for much of the country. I'd be happy to help with the map creation if you can point me towards your source.
Hassan Arara (2025-11-23 14:13:10+00:00): My source I am colecting form local communities but soon i will be puting my source website online and for boundary use source GADM
AndyB_66 (2025-10-03 15:29:22+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Good_changeset_comments
𝚗𝚘𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚟𝚎𝚗 (2025-10-03 15:35:11+00:00): I know rules, thx) i used osmand, and saw building that i should edit and did it quickly
campbelltree (2025-10-04 05:25:23+00:00): Hey there, thanks for your contribution. One minor point to improve for the future -- you've glued the camera POI to the sidewalk. Try zooming in further to make the node distinct, or use StreetComplete which will never glue a "Thing" to a Way.
rohieb (2026-01-10 00:13:46+00:00): Moin! Danke für deine Verbesserung der Karte, und kurzes Feedback hierzu: Die Brücke als ein einziges Objekt (statt 3 mit den selben Attributen) einzutragen hätte meiner Meinung nach gereicht. Dann hast du bridge=boardwalk als Attribut benutzt, das beschreibt aber einen Bohlenweg, also eine nur sehr niedrige Brücke über sumpfigen oder sandigen Untergrund (siehe Link zur Wiki-Seite für Bilder); da es sich hier aber um eine ganz normale Brücke handelt, genügt bridge=yes. Da die Brücke über der Fuhse ist, bekommt sie einen Layer mehr (layer=1) als die Fuhse (die hier implizit layer=0 als Standardwert hat).
Und dann würde ich dich bitten, Beschreibungen nicht mit Namen zu verwechseln, außer an der Brücke ist wirklich ein Schild o.ä., das sie offiziell als "Fussgängerbrücke über die Fuse" benennt  🙂 Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen#name_ist_nur_der_Name für mehr Beispiele zu dieser Regel.
Und danke, dass du eine Quelle bei deiner Änderung angegeben hast, das Fehlen einer soclhen fällt mir im Nachhinein in vielen anderen Changesets meist negativ auf! 😁

Ich habe diese Dinge mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177045491 gleich selbst behoben.
bxl-forever (2025-10-03 16:07:32+00:00): ## REVERTED CHANGESET

Please do not add such features if nothing is visible.  This is probably for OpenHistoricalMap and not for the main OSM database.
CoMicFont (2025-10-03 20:02:55+00:00): Sorry for the hiccup : still a beginner with Organic Maps App. Wanted to pin the place as a reminder. Cheers
kamilbogacki (2025-10-03 15:30:42+00:00): Część drzew może mieć złe leaf_type. Poprawię w przyszłości
söm4324 (2025-10-07 08:29:41+00:00): Hallo Evros1969, ich hab mir grad deine Änderung zur Pfarrkirche angeschaut, sieht schon sehr schick aus. :) 

Drauf gekommen bin ich allerdings durch eine Maproulette-Challenge zum Thema "Gebäude im Gebäude", siehe u.a. https://maproulette.org/challenge/49603/task/307404108 
Wenn sich nämlich Objekte mit building=* innerhalb eines anderen building=* befinden, kommt es zu einer Fehlermeldung. Der richtige Weg ist dann, den Außenumriss des Gebäudes mit building=* zu erstellen und alle Gebäudeteile mit building:part=* innerhalb dieses Umrisses einzuzeichnen. (Zur Erstellung von 3D-Gebäuden gibt es hier einiges zu lesen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Simple_3D_Buildings)

Deine Kirche habe ich grad eben schonmal so umgebaut, dass es dem building/building:part-Schema entspricht. Schau es dir gerne an und gib mir Bescheid, wenn etwas kaputt gegangen ist oder noch Fragen sind.

Ansonsten noch fröhliches Weitermappen! :-)
Evros1969 (2025-10-10 04:22:09+00:00): Hllo söm4324 danke für deine Korrekturen und Umbauten der Pfarrkirche St Martin. Das hast du für mich gut bearbeitet, sieht gut aus auf 3D. In die Zukunft werde ich das Shema building udd building=part besser beherrschen dank deiner Ratschläge. Ich wünsche dir einen schönenTag.
NeisBot (2025-10-03 15:46:48+00:00): Hola Steven92@, bienvenido y gracias por tu contribución.

Para facilitar la colaboración y ayudar a los demás a entender tus ediciones, es mejor agregar una breve descripción de los cambios que realizaste. Los comentarios claros ayudan a la comunidad a seguir tu trabajo y proporcionar mejores comentarios. Puedes encontrar consejos para escribir buenos comentarios aquí[1].

Basado en tus ediciones del mapa en este conjunto de cambios, he redactado una sugerencia sobre cómo podría parecerse un comentario: "Agregué área y nombré PARQUE IGL"
(Auto-translation)
---
Hi Steven92@, welcome and thanks for your contribution!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

Based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Added area and named PARQUE IGL"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Константин Гам (2025-10-06 13:46:28+00:00): Пожалуйста не вносите то что недоступно для общего пользования без соотв.тегов либо access, либо construction: или иных (наиболее подходящих).
Меня навигатор опять привёл на стройку при поиске ближайшей детской площадки.
Dinamik (2025-10-16 04:50:19+00:00): access на детскую площадку я добавил, но ещё я бы рекомендовал рассмотреть возможность исключения при поиске ближайших объектов тех, к которых можно подойти только по дорогам с ограниченным доступом. В данном случае на всех подходящих к детской площадке путях стоял запрет использования, но программа Вас всë равно повела. На детских площадках, расположенных на территориях детских садов и закрытых дворов часто не стоит access.
Константин Гам (2025-10-16 06:53:35+00:00): Я искал сами обьекты типа *детская площадка*. без маршрутов.

и теги access в этом и подобных случаях обязательны,также как делают с parking.
просто паркинги ищут чаще, чем детские площадки...
Dinamik (2025-10-16 14:44:36+00:00): Если искать объекты просто по расстоянию по прямой, может оказаться, что ближайший объект находится с другой стороны забора/автомагистрали/реки/границы – чего-то, что мешает попасть к объекту. Если задачей того, кто ищет,  является не построение маршрута к объекту поиска, а просто его визуальный осмотр со стороны, то теги доступа на самом объекте, получается, можно и не учитывать.
Константин Гам (2025-10-16 15:15:18+00:00): Просто вносите корректные данные, и спасибо на этом)
nona mostafa (2025-10-06 08:28:57+00:00): Hi Albert Shotl 3,
Thank you for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
I noticed that some streets inside Mohammed VI Polytechnic University you reclassified from footway or pedestrian to living_street.
Examples:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/917791109
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/639305136
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/917791062
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1428284680
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1428286010
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1428286011
It might be more accurate to tag these as highway=service with service=driveway, since living_street is typically used in residential areas.
You can check the wiki for details:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=living_street
Could you please review these edits and adjust them if needed?
Thank you again for your time and effort to improve the map!
Best regards,
nona mostafa
Albert Shotl 3 (2025-10-06 08:54:41+00:00): Dear nona mostafa, I updated the changes according to your reccomendation. Thanks a lot for the insights.
nona mostafa (2025-10-07 07:17:23+00:00): I'm glad I could help. We are all here to improve OSM.
Interteutones (2025-12-08 21:50:06+00:00): Hallo Kollege,

bitte sei so lieb und prüfe mal, ob in Weschnitz an den von dirn bearbeiteten Stellen wirklich Fusswege sind. Ich kann keine(n) erkennen.
Danke und Gruß
Frans S (2025-10-21 14:09:52+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
You mapped  the buildings far oversized.

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172801079
SomeoneElse2 (2025-10-05 12:18:46+00:00): Hello,
It looks like the merging of two bits of river to form https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/376669668 might have broken a couple of boundaries, since the southeastern part was part of the boundary and the northwestern part was not.
I've split the river again; hopefully that will fix things.
HellMap (2026-05-26 10:29:08+00:00): Čau,

No kādiem avotiem to secināji, ka https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1435133277 un https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1435133287 ir pirmsskola un skola? Tu norādīji tikai ortofoto kā avotu izmaiņai. Es nevaru neko atrast internetā, ka te būtu aktīvas izglītības iestādes. "Sīļukalna bērnudārzs" vispār nav atrodams. Bet pamatskola izklausās 2020. gadā slēgta.
Mister_R2 (2026-06-10 09:10:00+00:00): Par bērnudārza un pamatskolas atrašanās vietām es izmantoju lģia karti. Varbūt biju kļūdījies ar nosaukumu, vairāk uz skaidrojumu biju domājis.
HellMap (2026-06-10 10:56:36+00:00): Ņem vērā, ka LĢIA pārskata karte norāda pārsvarā ēku paredzēto izmantošanu/uzbūvi (no kadastra/ēku datiem) nevis faktisko. Šie dati var būt gan nepareizi gan novecojuši. Tos var izmantot piemēram noteikt vai tā ir daudzdzīvokļu ēka. Bet no tā nevar noteikt vai tur ir faktiski aktīva mācību iestāde. Citiem vārdiem, tur ir tikai dati par `building=school` vai `building=preschool`, bet ne par `amenity=*`.

Un nosaukumus nevajadzētu likt, ja tie nav no avota. Piemēram, tāds termins "bērnudārzs" Latvijā vispār nepastāv vairs.

Šajā gadījumā izskatās, ka neviena no šīm iestādēm šeit vairs nav.
Mister_R2 (2026-06-20 07:42:40+00:00): A labi, saprotu. Kāds varētu būt labs avots, kas nav novecojis? Varbūt no kādas citas valsts iestādes datiem?