piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Halfix (2024-10-08 09:25:29+00:00): Es gibt leider keine dedizierte Klassifizierung für MTB-Trails. Ich habe diesen Fall auch im OSM-Forum vorgestellt (https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/ein-mtb-downhill-trail-eignet-sich-nicht-zum-wandern/116294), aber da kam auch kein wirklich guter Vorschlag. Was auch immer man macht ist also ein Kompromiss und dieser Weg ist definitiv ein reinrassiger MTB-Trail (also damit ein "Radweg") und kein Fußweg. Dass er nicht für jeden Radlertyp geeignet ist, sollte über den mtb:scale beschrieben sein. Wer den nicht beachtet, dem passiert halt das gleiche, wie dem Sonntagsspaziergänger, der einen hohen sac_scale ignoriert. Es ist auch so, dass für einen path dann der oneway unsinnig wird, denn wenn man hier als Wanderer läuft, dann geht das viel eher noch aufwärts als abwärts.
DahlemerHamba (2024-10-08 10:32:37+00:00): Mach, was du willst. 

Wenn es den ersten eBiker zerlegt, ist das Geschrei auf jeden Fall größer, als wenn sich ein Wanderer in den Trail verirrt...
toco91 (2024-10-08 20:37:03+00:00): Reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157645447 based on discussion here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157596529
orthocircular (2024-10-07 21:50:49+00:00): Thanks for your contributions! Please use descriptive changeset messages to make reviewing (and your own history!) easier.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157597378
Rus Ionut (2025-02-26 13:20:09+00:00): Strad cu id 238155401 se numeste Strada Neculești sau Strada Necșulești?
rarad74 (2025-02-28 06:53:35+00:00): Salut. Necșulesti este corect. Am modificat.
eggie (2024-10-07 21:10:27+00:00): Welkom bij OSM.  De info heb ik verplaatst naar de adresnode. Tegenwoordig gebruiken wie die om bedrijven op bij te taggen.
MVG
eggie
Mtotheathe (2024-10-07 21:19:41+00:00): Hi, 

Ik heb de data geedit vanuit organicmaps, zou ik dat in het vervolg op een andere manier moeten doen?

Thanks!
eggie (2024-10-07 21:28:36+00:00): Hoi..
Die editor is erg beperkt.
De data stond nog op de 'oude' manier.
Het is niet eens fout.. maar de consensus is nu om de adresnode te gebruiken.
Wanneer ik iets tegenkom pas ik het aan. De Toyota net ook aangepast.
Of dat met organic gaat.. geen idee.
Ik zal je morgen onze welkomstmail sturen met tips en trics.
Groet..
eggie

Mvg..
eggie
Mtotheathe (2024-10-07 21:32:03+00:00): Ah oke, dankjewel voor de moeite!
eggie (2024-10-08 05:44:54+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
NorthCrab_upload (2024-10-07 20:21:03+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2986116579
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/395562221

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2024-10-07 20:32:35+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12233148881

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
limes11 (2024-10-13 08:45:21+00:00): Hi,

das stimmt wohl doch nicht:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4475723

Ich würde das komplett revertieren, oder steckt noch mehr im Changeset ?

Ist geoportal-bw für die Nutzung in osm freigegeben ?

Schöne Grüße
sllabres (2024-10-13 11:35:13+00:00): Ich war vor Ort und habe mir die Daten auf OpenData/WMS LGL-BW Basiskarte angesehen. Dort ist die Straße als L 81 gekennzeichnet.

Ich habe mir die Straße eben noch einmal in der 1:10000 Topographischen Karte angesehen, dort ist sie ebenfalls als L81 aufgeführt. Ebenso unter z.B. https://verkehrsinfo-bw.de/

Für OpenData hätte ich dem Changeset wohl noch "Datenquelle: LGL, www.lgl-bw.de, dl-de/by-2-0" anfügen müssen.
limes11 (2024-10-13 13:00:47+00:00): Ok - Ist es denn vor Ort beschildert ? Dann ist es natürlich als Quelle okay.

Meines Wissens und nach den letzten Infos hier

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/maps4bw-und-basemap-de/6762/104

ist lgl-bw.de keine für osm freigegebene Quelle. OpenData bedeutet nicht unbedingt, open für osm. Das wird sich hoffentlich zeitnah ändern, siehe Thread.

Viele Grüße
sllabres (2024-10-13 19:03:03+00:00): Nein, vor Ort konnte ich keine Beschilderung finden.
sllabres (2024-10-13 19:15:45+00:00): Der Change ist zurückgenommen.
Lepidobatrachus (2024-10-09 12:46:26+00:00): landuse=allotments - тег для площадных объектов только. Назначать official_status нецелесообразно, так как в названии от уже есть
pbnoxious (2024-10-10 07:24:29+00:00): Hi, danke für deine Ergänzung!
Kenn mich vor Ort nicht gut aus, aber wenn die Straße hier keine Zufahrt zu den Gebäuden ist, würde ich sie noch "herabstufen" und nur als "highway=track" (land-/forstw. Weg, wie die nach Norden und Osten anschließenden Wege) eintragen.
RainerZufal (2024-10-10 13:50:20+00:00): Hey, Ist mein erster Beitrag. Die Straße ist tatsächlich eine Zufahrt zu den Gebäuden und von der Beschaffung auch anders als die nördlich und östlich angrenzenden Wege. Nach recherche wäre vermutlich vehicle=destination passender, so ist es vor Ort auch ausgeschildert.
Lepidobatrachus (2024-10-09 12:47:16+00:00): Зачем удалять name? name:ru его не заменяет, все равно основной тег должен быть
Nathan_A_RF (2024-10-08 20:05:56+00:00): Hi. Please don't tag every single road with a "oneway=no" tag, as this is unnecessary with the tag already implied. Furthermore, speed limits on public roads do not extend to private driveways, so please do not mark driveways with "maxspeed=30 mph" or "maxspeed=60 mph"
samjcorbin (2024-10-09 02:40:27+00:00): Hi there, just to clarify, in what case should a road be explicitly tagged with oneway=no?
Nathan_A_RF (2024-10-09 10:11:19+00:00): Only where there could be confusion around whether the road is oneway or twoway, for example here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/354333344#map=19/50.925942/-1.438152
Đuro Jiří (2024-10-08 16:13:12+00:00): "Kad se nađete usred ničega, legenda koja radi tu će vas spasit"????? Što to znači?
YukiCRO (2024-10-11 20:01:47+00:00): Da
Mxdanger (2024-10-08 02:06:09+00:00): Added POI https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12233743407
PaulT (2024-10-07 21:14:39+00:00): Source should have been local knowledge
user_11609320 (2024-10-07 21:42:01+00:00): they have to redo the northbound lanes because of a tribal grave they found.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:14:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:13:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:13:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:24:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:15:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
os-emmer (2024-10-10 15:54:21+00:00): Hi salisburymistake,
you added a strange node here, probably on accident. Can you have a second look?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:traffic_calming%3Disland
os-emmer (2024-10-10 15:56:47+00:00): Sorry, wrong link:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12233287113
salisburymistake (2024-10-10 16:12:51+00:00): Ope, yep, that was a copy & paste error. Fixed now. Thanks!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:12:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:23:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:15:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
pehar_11 (2024-11-04 21:59:23+00:00): Veletrgovina "Eurospin" idalje nije otvorena niti izgrađena na određenoj lokaciji.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:23:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
Xvtn (2024-10-09 20:54:26+00:00): In this case, could a member of the public park at the Quick Quack lot for a fee? Otherwise I wonder if perhaps access=customers might be more appropriate.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:18:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:16:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:22:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
spam46200 (2024-10-10 15:32:21+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1321995590 Tutaj błędne ,,no+" przy ,,horse". Zamiast wpisywać wszystkie typy pojazdów, możesz po prostu dać access=no do drogi w budowie.
WWMapper101 (2024-12-24 15:46:01+00:00): Hi! Just to let you know - the addr:country tag is meant to have the 2-letter country code, not the full name of the country. I’ve changed this in the most recent changeset.
VlIvYur (2025-01-06 12:07:21+00:00): Hi and thank you.I don't bother at all fixing addr:country-it can be taken from the surrounding country polygon (and I don't like this tag)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:20:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:21:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
fortera_au (2024-10-08 02:30:48+00:00): Hi, you've included a portion of the road in the school boundary, as well as set the entire area to be a building. It should be tagged as amenity=school, with no building tag, and the way should be separate from the roads
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157601931
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:20:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:16:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:12:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
fortera_au (2024-10-08 02:31:44+00:00): Hi, same as the primary school, amenity=school, and no building tag. It also overlaps the primary school, these should be separate and touching at most, not overlapping.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157601976
stasiu512 (2024-10-12 22:49:30+00:00): Cześć, dzięki za te dwie edycje, są czasochłonne. Tutaj ruch po torowisku jest dozwolony więc sprawa się szybko wyjaśnia. Czy masz pomysł na Hallera i Mickiewicza?
Na Hallera ruch jest częściowo dozwolony na Mickiewicza nie. Czy to coś zmienia??
theDM (2024-10-13 07:59:32+00:00): Cześć, jak patrzę na Street View (https://www.google.com/maps/@54.3833683,18.6193936,3a,75y,254.65h,78.45t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sMN2nMBYuoM2bELEU_Xutvw!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fcb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26pitch%3D11.552705338698118%26panoid%3DMN2nMBYuoM2bELEU_Xutvw%26yaw%3D254.6504447380807!7i13312!8i6656?coh=205410&entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI0MTAwOS4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D), to na Mickiewicza sytuacja wygląda podobnie, chyba że zmienili tam oznaczenia po remoncie, ale tego nie wiem.
Na Hallera odcinek od Trubadurów do Klinicznej jest do zmiany na 1 linię. Waham się między Trubadurów a Zwycięstwa, bo tam torowisko jest wydzielone ciągłą linią.
theDM (2024-10-13 08:12:14+00:00): Od Zwycięstwa do Towarowej bym zostawił dwie jezdnie, od Towarowej do Trubadurów bym stopniowo sprowadzał dwie jezdnie do jednej. Dalej do Klinicznej bym zrobił jedną linię.
Początek i koniec jednej jezdni można dać w miejscu, gdzie stykają
lewoskręty Hallera - Kliniczna albo na zjeździe Kliniczna - Wyspiańskiego.
stasiu512 (2024-10-13 09:19:44+00:00): Na Mickiewicza po remoncie ruch nie jest dopuszczony po torach, widać to na nowszym Street View z Hallera - https://www.google.com/maps/@54.3833696,18.62171,3a,51y,272.05h,88.74t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1s3Gt4ywukAcXdEa4VtLTJ9Q!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fcb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26pitch%3D1.2593764139182042%26panoid%3D3Gt4ywukAcXdEa4VtLTJ9Q%26yaw%3D272.04839015394737!7i16384!8i8192?coh=205410&entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI0MTAwOS4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D więc tam bym faktycznie zostawił dwie tak jak na Nowych Ogrodach przy Urzędzie Miejskim.
Co do Hallera myślę że rozwiązanie, które napisałeś byłoby prawidłowe patrząc na oznakowanie, natomiast zastanawia mnie jeszcze kwestia lewoskrętów Hallera-Zwycięstwa oznaczonych highway=primary_link. Brakuje rozdzielenia (powierzchnia wyłączona z ruchu nim nie jest) i ruch po torach jest dopuszczony. Czy to nie powinna być również jedna linia?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:10:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:12:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
tyfi (2024-10-07 23:48:47+00:00): Additional source: city website
hoserab (2024-10-09 17:50:40+00:00): Hi Andrew,

You seem to have pulled these nodes:
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/21090802
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/156900270
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2146618559
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2146618569
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2242331674

... in Toronto all out of whack. Seems unrelated to your changes in Calgary. I've since tried my best to fix it. (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157683486)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:14:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:16:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:23:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:22:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:17:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:23:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:22:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:12:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:22:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:12:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
CurlingMan13 (2024-10-10 23:16:29+00:00): You can use "Q" to square the houses.  They are all mapped with random angles but they should be cleaned up a bit.
Mashin (2024-10-11 12:30:41+00:00): Hi,
thanks for editing, but I don't think it's a good idea to make 200 ft stretches of primary roads. Ideally we would want to have long stretches of roads connecting important cities as primary and not small stubs between interstate off-ramps.
Joseph R P (2024-10-11 16:01:36+00:00): This small stretch technically serves that purpose. It links Route 159 to Interstate 91 and eliminates a small gap in the primary route between the two highways. If you were traveling north on 91 and were heading to a nearby destination along 159, you would use this road.
Mashin (2024-10-14 12:51:05+00:00): Routing software would navigate though that section of the Meadow Road regardless of the classification. I don't think there is much benefit in having it as primary. 
Maybe try reaching out to @jnighan, who put a lot of thinking into road classification in CT, or ask on Slack before endeavoring in road reclassification.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:11:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:14:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
tyfi (2024-10-08 01:03:12+00:00): Positions will be refined in another changeset.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:17:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:14:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:21:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:11:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
fortera_au (2024-10-08 02:33:36+00:00): Hi, this doesn't look to be valid for amenity=college. College in a name doesn't inherently make it amenity=college.
fortera_au (2024-10-08 03:56:11+00:00): Also, has the old building actually been demolished?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157603476
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-08 01:19:55+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164657232
welzheimerwald (2024-10-08 01:45:17+00:00): Huch, Kommentar vergessen:

"MPs umgebaut, Boundaries verbessert, Ortschaften Loßburg und Dornstetten ergänzt; div. Fixes vorgenommen"
Dimitar155 (2024-12-19 19:53:48+00:00): Hey Patalakki,

Can you take a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1322012320? house=Mo-Fr 06:30-17:00 doesn't seem correct.

Happy holidays,
Dimitar
geisthugo123 (2024-10-10 02:11:36+00:00): Weg 1178756676 hat keine seperaten cycleways. Wie kommst du zu der Annahme
AlaiMei2384 (2024-10-08 03:39:01+00:00): Failed upload due to rate limits, worked all last week on this and I have no idea if/how I can salvage the work :(