piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
A67-A67 (2023-08-31 05:10:59+00:00): Hier staat de vertaling van isced-levels naar het Nederlandse onderwijs-systeem uitgelegd: https://www.cbs.nl/nl-nl/onze-diensten/methoden/classificaties/onderwijs-en-beroepen/isced/niveau-isced-2011 Daarin staat dat zowel de peuterspeelzaal als groep 1 en 2 onder level 0 vallen. Met isced:level=1 geef je dus aan dat deze school geen groep 1 en 2 heeft.

Op de wiki-pagina wordt aangeven dat er lijsten met puntkomma's en reeksen met koppelstreepjes in deze tag gebruikt worden voor scholen die meerdere isced-levels aanbieden. Zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:isced:level#Tagging

Deze meerdere waarden kunnen geparst worden uit de tag-waarde. Daarnaast wordt isced:level=0;1 ook gevonden door de overpass-query "isced:level"~"1".
map per (2023-08-30 21:29:09+00:00): Wegen review_requested:
Sieht alles gut aus, danke!
MxxCon (2023-08-31 01:59:45+00:00): Hello.
Please stop deleting POIs in NYC.
If a business closed, it should be marked as such using appropriate lifecycle prefix as documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
Or at the very least just delete the biz-specific tags but leave the address node.
Doing that preserves history of that object and allows that address to be searchable and routed to. If you just delete that node you destroy both of those things!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140606458
empty_child (2023-08-31 09:45:52+00:00): Hello Osterbotten,
OSM GE uses template for common POI data normalization. In any case, time to time overwrites to save data consistency. If you have doubts in its correctness, make an issue here (https://github.com/komachi/josm-ge-preset), or write us in our telegram group (https://t.me/osm_ge). Thank you
MxxCon (2023-08-31 01:52:02+00:00): Hello.
This should not be tagged as a pier. This used to be one, but now it resembles nothing of the sorts. This is now simply a water-front park.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140606530
MxxCon (2023-08-31 01:55:47+00:00): Hello.
Please stop deleting POIs in NYC.
If a business closed, it should be marked as such using appropriate lifecycle prefix as documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
Or at the very least just delete the biz-specific tags but leave the address node.
Doing that preserves history of that object and allows that address to be searchable and routed to. If you just delete that node you destroy both of those things!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140606712
Patchi (2025-04-10 19:12:57+00:00): Bonjour chrizy,

Je ne suis pas sur que les panneaux indicateurs information=guidepost
& tourism=information (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11157798628, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11157798626, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11157798627, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11157798625) créés dans ce groupes de modifications (et https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12691448665 dans un autre groupe de modifications) soient tout à fait correct. L'altitude ele=2 me parait très basse pour Avignon.  De plus les noms ont plus l'air d'être la destination du poteau (ce qui devrait être tagué avec "destination" voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:information=guidepost#Destinations).

Bonne continuation,

Patchi.
chrizy (2025-04-14 09:07:35+00:00): Bonjour Patchi,
Merci pour ton message, en effet j'avais compris que s'était l'élévation au-dessus du sol (2m) au lieu de l'altitude.
Pour la destination, je ne savais pas comment que ce tag existait, j'ai tant encore à apprendre sur OSM :)
Il y a probablement d'autres panneaux concernés par ces erreurs (désolé), je ne connais pas encore la commande OverPass pour les trouver tous ni la sélection/modification multiple avec JOSM...
Bien à toi,
Chris
MxxCon (2023-08-31 01:59:12+00:00): Hello.
Please stop deleting POIs in NYC.
If a business closed, it should be marked as such using appropriate lifecycle prefix as documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
Or at the very least just delete the biz-specific tags but leave the address node.
Doing that preserves history of that object and allows that address to be searchable and routed to. If you just delete that node you destroy both of those things!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140607051
MxxCon (2023-08-31 01:58:26+00:00): Hello.
Please stop deleting POIs in NYC.
If a business closed, it should be marked as such using appropriate lifecycle prefix as documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
Or at the very least just delete the biz-specific tags but leave the address node.
Doing that preserves history of that object and allows that address to be searchable and routed to. If you just delete that node you destroy both of those things!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140607239
MxxCon (2023-08-31 01:58:13+00:00): Hello.
Please stop deleting POIs in NYC.
If a business closed, it should be marked as such using appropriate lifecycle prefix as documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
Or at the very least just delete the biz-specific tags but leave the address node.
Doing that preserves history of that object and allows that address to be searchable and routed to. If you just delete that node you destroy both of those things!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140607242
MxxCon (2023-08-31 01:58:03+00:00): Hello.
Please stop deleting POIs in NYC.
If a business closed, it should be marked as such using appropriate lifecycle prefix as documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
Or at the very least just delete the biz-specific tags but leave the address node.
Doing that preserves history of that object and allows that address to be searchable and routed to. If you just delete that node you destroy both of those things!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140607256
MxxCon (2023-08-31 01:57:31+00:00): Hello.
Please stop deleting POIs in NYC.
If a business closed, it should be marked as such using appropriate lifecycle prefix as documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
Or at the very least just delete the biz-specific tags but leave the address node.
Doing that preserves history of that object and allows that address to be searchable and routed to. If you just delete that node you destroy both of those things!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140607263
MxxCon (2023-08-31 01:57:00+00:00): Hello.
Please stop deleting POIs in NYC.
If a business closed, it should be marked as such using appropriate lifecycle prefix as documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
Or at the very least just delete the biz-specific tags but leave the address node.
Doing that preserves history of that object and allows that address to be searchable and routed to. If you just delete that node you destroy both of those things!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140607272
MxxCon (2023-08-31 01:56:47+00:00): Hello.
Please stop deleting POIs in NYC.
If a business closed, it should be marked as such using appropriate lifecycle prefix as documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
Or at the very least just delete the biz-specific tags but leave the address node.
Doing that preserves history of that object and allows that address to be searchable and routed to. If you just delete that node you destroy both of those things!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140607275
Jordi MF (2023-09-03 00:32:24+00:00): Hola Alex,

¿Puedes devir cuál es la fuente de información para añadir el nombre 'Eki's Dog Park, Dog Park, HM King Charles III Path, Yorkshire Plaza, Watsçdeloo Skatepark y HM Alex Park? ¿Hay placas del ayuntamiento informando de estos nombres?

Gracias
Saludos,
Jordi
Alex1222 (2023-09-03 08:58:09+00:00): Tras la muerte de la reina isabel ii de inglaterra, el ayuntamiento de Galdakao lleva empadronado con Bath (Inglaterra) muchos años, en su honor se dedicaron varias plazas a su nombre, cuales placas puedes encontrar en dichos sitios que han sido añadidos. Gracias
AmyCupcake (2023-09-03 09:35:42+00:00): Quien exactamente es “Su Majestad Alex”, soy una inglesa y nunca he oído de este persona de la familia real.
Jordi MF (2023-09-03 14:37:06+00:00): No entiendo qué tiene que ver la muerte de Isabel II con añadir los siguientes nombres en su memoria: Eki's Dog Park, Dog Park, HM King Charles III Path, Yorkshire Plaza, Waterloo Skatepark y HM Alex Park. No he encontrado esta dedicatorias en ninguna noticia de internet. ¿Podrías facilitar un enlace a alguna noticia o imágenes de las placas?
Davileci (2023-09-04 02:25:22+00:00): No puede porque todo es mentira. Galdacano está hermanado con Pimentel (República Dominicana), https://www.galdakao.eus/ampliar/galdakao-y-la-localidad-pimentel-republica-dominicana-firman-el-hermanamiento-aprobado-por-unanimidad-entre-ambos-municipios/6534/2809, y Chinchero (Perú), https://www.galdakao.eus/ampliar/galdakao-impulsara-proyectos-de-cooperacion-en-peru-tras-el-hermanamiento-llevado-a-cabo-con-chinchero/6107/20896.
Además, el conjunto de cambios también alcanza Bilbao y no tiene sentido que los topónimos sean en inglés (lejos de Gibraltar).
Jordi MF (2023-09-04 13:58:39+00:00): Gracias Davileci. He eliminado todos los nombres sospechosos y que no he encontrado en el callejero de geoEuskadi (https://www.geo.euskadi.eus/inicio/)
MxxCon (2023-08-31 01:56:32+00:00): Hello.
Please stop deleting POIs in NYC.
If a business closed, it should be marked as such using appropriate lifecycle prefix as documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
Or at the very least just delete the biz-specific tags but leave the address node.
Doing that preserves history of that object and allows that address to be searchable and routed to. If you just delete that node you destroy both of those things!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140607503
streckenkundler (2023-08-30 21:10:17+00:00): Sorry. I had to revert your CS. A lot of support points disappeared undocumented during the upload... I can't explain it either...

See also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/id-verschwundene-stutzpunkte/103284
mmd (2023-08-30 21:37:46+00:00): Stützpunkte sind da keine verloren gegangen (sieht man hier: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1zCU ). Allerdings wurde in diesen Änderungssatz aus dem Weg 309471261 ein geschlossener Weg gemacht (d.h. Anfangs- und Endpunkt sind identisch), so dass im Nordwesten diese langgezogene Linie entsteht.
streckenkundler (2023-08-31 20:09:05+00:00): Hallo dwormanns,

ich mache mal in deutsch weiter...  :)
Wie du im bisherigen Ergebnis im Forum gelesen haben wirst, lag der Fehler hier nicht an Dir, sondern in einer unzulänglichen Interpretation der OSM-Daten durch iD! Wir werden das bei den dortigen Entwicklern thematisieren.

Lass dich aber dadurch nicht beirren... 

Bei Fragen steht das Forum https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/de/56 immer zur Verfügung und Hilfe ist garantiert (auch wenn manche Fragen mal ausarten können... :) )

Also: weitemachen...

Grüße, Sven
mappinglander (2023-09-07 10:33:37+00:00): Hello,
I have noticed your edits. While they may be correct under another point of view as it is a disputed territory, I would like to remind that mapping on  OpenStreetMap is based on mapping what is on the ground. Thus, I would like to request from you to cease activities such as deliberately removing boundaries and names, as those activities would constitute vandalism.
For more information, please see: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Vandalism
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Map_what's_on_the_ground
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Disputed_territories
Thanks for understanding.
With regards, mappinglander
------------------------------------------------------
Բարեւ Ձեզ,
Ես նկատել եմ քո խմբագրումները։ Թեև դրանք կարող են ճիշտ լինել մեկ այլ տեսանկյունից, քանի որ դա վիճելի տարածք է, ես կցանկանայի հիշեցնել, որ OpenStreetMap-ում քարտեզագրումը հիմնված է գետնի վրա եղածի քարտեզագրման վրա: Այսպիսով, ես կցանկանայի ձեզ խնդրել դադարեցնել այնպիսի գործողությունները, ինչպիսիք են սահմանների և անունների միտումնավոր վերացումը, քանի որ այդ գործողությունները վանդալիզմ են:
Լրացուցիչ տեղեկությունների համար տես.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Vandalism
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Map_what's_on_the_ground
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Disputed_territories
Շնորհակալություն ըմբռնման համար:
Հարգանքներով՝ mappinglander

Թարգմանված է մեքենայական թարգմանությամբ։
OSchlüter (2023-08-31 11:03:11+00:00): Moin
Das ist nicht ganz so einfach
Es werden immer kleine Abschnitte
für 4-8 Wochen gesperrt
https://www.glueckstadt.de/media/custom/2985_12_1.PDF?1530024894
puma515 (2023-09-01 11:23:05+00:00): Moin, 
Danke für den hinweis. Ich Komme leider nicht aus der gegend und kann das nicht vor ort überprüfen wo da zurzeit wirklich gesperrt ist. Da meine änderung so zum teil falsch sind habe ich diese nun natürlich auch revertet: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140674651

schön gruß puma515
vasony (2023-09-02 10:00:41+00:00): Szia!

A Bing műholdképe Balatongyörökön (is) el van csúszva. Új épületek hozzáadása előtt szükséges pl. a FÖMI ortofotóhoz igazítani. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hu:Beginners_Guide_1.3.5#M%C5%B1holdk%C3%A9p_v%C3%A1laszt%C3%A1sa

Tamás
SDan_41587 (2023-09-02 17:57:34+00:00): Szia!

Ne haragudj, nem tudtam.
Megnéztem és nekem nem tölti be a FÖMI ortofotót, így nem tudom összevetni, hogy mennyire rosszul csináltam meg.

Legközelebb alkalmazom a  légifelvétel elcsúszásának korrigálását, igazodva a már elkészült adatokhoz.

Üdv:Dan
citrula (2023-08-31 05:00:02+00:00): Hi! In the iD editor, you can press the "q" key to square corners when you are mapping.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140607871
Znaika (2024-11-02 10:23:36+00:00): Bitte überprüfen!
Ich sehe Nr. 14 an der Hausfassade. Das Haus hat zwei Eingänge. 14 und 16 ???
Znaika (2024-11-02 10:44:50+00:00): es geht um dieses Haus 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/109852719
ChrisFromRV (2024-11-02 12:35:52+00:00): Habe es korrigiert.
muralito (2023-08-31 15:01:26+00:00): Hi. Please don't delete housenumbers from de address nodes, as all the housenumbers are valid. Just add another node with the restaurant and put their housenumber alone.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-08-30 21:10:16+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/607670189

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
WieKo68 (2024-06-11 17:25:47+00:00): poprawione
Layft Greater (2026-03-26 06:46:39+00:00): access actually requires a an access permit, so i guess "private" suits better here
jbcharron (2023-08-31 17:01:24+00:00): Bonjour Karto, merci pour tes contributions :)
Pour information, le code postal et le Ville n'est pas nécessaire, on est capable de le déterminer à partir des frontières de la ville.

Bonne soirée à toi
AndyB_66 (2023-09-18 08:24:01+00:00): What is the source of your statement?
NorthCrab_upload (2023-08-30 21:40:17+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11157994109
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11157994107
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/323312288
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/323312289
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/323312290
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/323312292
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/323546956

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Awoobis (2023-08-30 21:42:38+00:00): Wiem. Okolica jest !#@$ i do naprawy
NorthCrab (2023-08-31 10:24:09+00:00): Spoko, nie musisz tego robić, bot tylko informuje :-) Nie ma to większego znaczenia jeśli już tak było długi czas.
Branko Kokanovic (2023-12-11 11:18:31+00:00): This is vandalism, please don't change those values anymore
Branko Kokanovic (2023-12-11 11:19:43+00:00): reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144995532

Again, please don't do this
CharliePlett (2023-11-16 03:19:37+00:00): Hey, thanks for updating the name of the Coastal Plain Highway. I didn't notice that the name changed till just now. I followed your edit trail through Mexico and Belize, happy travels.
solarcruiser (2023-11-17 16:37:08+00:00): Hey Charlie

Yes, we decided to pick up mapping on our current tour of Central / North America to contribute a bit to the great project we are using so much (:
If you want to see some more of our journey, we have a blog at www.einfach-luxus.jimdofree.com (posts in German and the local language if possible, with lots of fotos).

Best regards,
Simon & Rita
NorthCrab_upload (2023-08-30 22:00:17+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/678289813

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/678289483
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/678289519

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
WieKo68 (2024-06-11 17:24:58+00:00): poprawiono
Fizzie-DWG (2023-08-30 23:58:13+00:00): Hi. Just making sure thanks. Is the info from the "Fire Department" released under an open licence, or do we have approval to use it? Thanks, Graeme Fitzpatrick,
OSMF Data Working Group
janspeller (2023-08-31 00:55:07+00:00): Hi,
its Data we have at the Fire Department. The ref numbers are stated on the Signs which are of course viewable by the public, so I dont think there are any issues regarding Licensing
Fizzie-DWG (2023-08-31 01:21:12+00:00): Thanks! Unfortunately, just because the ref is shown, doesn't automatically mean we can copy from their database! Could you please check with your superiors that it is OK, &, if possible, get something in writing from them to confirm?
janspeller (2023-08-31 07:23:01+00:00): I didnt copy it from any database, I drove around and grabbed the numbers off of the signs. Im in Charge of mapping the Hydrants to use for Openfiremap.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-08-31 23:32:50+00:00): Thanks again. In that case, to avoid concern & confusion, please list your source as Survey.
arik123max (2023-08-31 10:04:04+00:00): Tu by podla mňa bolo o dosť lepšie mapovať parkovisko ako plochu, keďže to veľmi dobre vidno na ortofoto
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140609793
muralito (2023-08-31 13:30:45+00:00): Hi. IMO this is not an improvement and is losing information. The previous phone number should allow you to contact this branch directly, and if you put a call free 0800 you probably fall in pharmacy group call center, when what you probably need is to contact this specific pharmacy.

Maybe the previuos number is obsolete and should be updated, but is not the most common case.
DG621 (2023-08-31 16:41:48+00:00): I agree. I restored the previous number.
NieWnen (2023-08-31 19:01:01+00:00): Te domki tutaj, to już raczej `building=house house=terraced`

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1203819432

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dterrace
Fizzie-DWG (2023-12-19 06:34:03+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145277600
WoodWoseWulf (2023-08-30 23:06:37+00:00): *will not fix it*
AustinZhao (2023-09-02 06:21:56+00:00): Hi, I'm from NUS and live in this University Town as well. I can confirm what this guy is saying. University town is a residential area and there are no classrooms or classes conducted in the area. A fix would be greatly appreciated.
CurlingMan13 (2026-04-24 18:58:36+00:00): please don't attach landuse to roadways.
thedarkcave215 (2026-04-24 19:54:33+00:00): Oops, didn’t notice i did that
thedarkcave215 (2026-04-24 19:58:47+00:00): Oh, now I see it. Won’t do that again in the future
pza (2023-08-31 03:14:22+00:00): FYI, I fixed this up a bit in 140614181 as it was flagged due to missing relationship roles. Also updated the lane markings which were changed yesterday.
Maradona11 (2023-08-31 03:55:00+00:00): awesome. Thank you! :)
Msiipola (2024-04-19 09:44:36+00:00): Väg 1203825507 norr om E20 vid Korsbäcken, syns inte på någon bakgrund jag har. Finns den här vägen? Path kanske?
archie (2024-04-19 10:40:06+00:00): Svårt att säga. På LM orto finns vägar/spår, men inte riktigt med den sträckningen som väg 1203825507 visar. Den som ursprungligen ritat in "stigen/vägen" är den här usern: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/MagnusEngwall. Skulle du kunna kolla med honom?
arjunaraoc (2024-01-06 02:22:53+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).

Please upload your nearby edits as a separate changeset.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140611245
jake_penguins (2023-09-08 19:48:31+00:00): The building you added near 19th Street and Naismith Drive no longer exists. It has been demolished as of 2023. There is already a demolished building area there to denote this. I live in the area, so I can confirm this in person.
user_18365999 (2023-09-16 20:03:33+00:00): I understand your saying, but I can't verify your saying is truth or not, you may need to prove your sayings to other OSM Mapper, e.g. take a photo of scene of a demolished building area which your said, to have your saying verified.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-24 02:35:03+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141665612
user_18365999 (2023-10-01 00:14:50+00:00): Sorry of my edits are not admirable.

The map of Lawrence, Kansas deserves only poor and gross geometry of buildings and other features. Bye bye.
jake_penguins (2023-10-01 00:26:13+00:00): lol
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-01 00:55:28+00:00): I should mention that the map of Lawrence, Kansas deserves imports to be discussed, data to come from clearly proper sources & good quality mapping!
jake_penguins (2023-10-01 01:12:05+00:00): @Fizzie41 Thank you for the reverts, glad someone else noticed those changes were imported without regard for what was already mapped. I will certainly continue to contribute quality improvements around Lawrence.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-01 01:18:51+00:00): Thanks! Still a few more to be done - 10000 edit CS are a bit slow to get through!
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-01 01:20:20+00:00): Oh, & thanks also for commenting on their doubtful CS! If other mappers are uncertain about things it gives us more to work on.
Baloo Uriza (2024-01-29 18:38:39+00:00): Please be sure to doublecheck route relations and lanes after modifying ways that have lanes or parts of routes.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-12-19 06:33:07+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145277573
blacx (2023-08-31 10:59:14+00:00): No, not even close, everything from Glories to Verdaguer will open next year. What is being tested (and should open tomorrow) is the Glories station to reconnect the Ciutadella to Gran Via and lower Diagonal.