piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:19:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:21:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:18:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
Baloo Uriza (2024-06-13 20:52:22+00:00): Please don't add your back yard as a public park.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151336843
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:24:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:22:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:11:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:17:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
H_S (2025-09-02 18:45:06+00:00): Buenos días, ¿qué fuente de datos has utilizado aquí?
Cafetom (2025-09-03 01:16:26+00:00): Hola actualmente se encuentra en construcción la vía de acceso al aeropuerto del café, soy de la zona.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:12:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2024-05-16 10:26:59+00:00): Pourriez-vous confirmer qu'il y a une pancarte confirmant l'interdiction aux piétons?
NeisBot (2024-05-15 01:30:07+00:00): Hi Billy Racette, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature's:
https://osm.org/way/1283064870
https://osm.org/way/1283064871

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
Pontius (2024-05-15 03:07:35+00:00): What is so special about US 24 that it warrants trunk road classification all the way to Indiana?
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-05-15 08:58:16+00:00): All class changes have been reverted including boundaries that were also changed to highway=trunk. Please don't embark on a mass retagging before consulting with the local community!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151337568
map per (2024-05-15 05:55:11+00:00): Hello OrdinaryCuts,

it looks like you Organic Maps installation doesn't work properly. It uploaded more than 13.000 empty changesets by now. 

This (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149609997) was your last non empty changeset (on April 5. 2024). Did you use Organic Maps for editing the Map after the 5. of April?

Have you considered updating the app to a new version? Yours is, reportedly, from 2023.11.17.

Thanks and best regards
map per
map per (2024-05-29 19:45:08+00:00): Just wanted to say thank you and to let you know that what ever you changed worked. In the last two weeks there were no further empty changesets.

Best regards
map per
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-05-17 00:35:07+00:00): This changeset deleted a connection to the roundabout. Please be careful
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151338479
shu0410 (2024-05-15 03:38:57+00:00): ？哥你吓到我了
meongseolin (2024-05-16 13:46:55+00:00):  他常嘴臭，别理他
Glassman (2024-05-15 18:38:52+00:00): A plaza should be tagged as place=square. Ideally using a polygon, but a node can be used.

Also - just a note that OSM spells out street names. The reason is that software has a hard time unabbreviating. Can you review this contribution?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151338976
shu0410 (2024-05-15 03:49:56+00:00): 哥 麻烦看下群里消息 谢谢了
aq123 (2024-05-15 05:37:34+00:00): Добрый день!

Вместо имени "Ветеринарная клиника" лучше было просто указать тип объекта (в OsmAnd есть подходящий - Veterinary).
Если неизвестно имя клиники или его просто нет, поле name лучше вообще не добавлять.
Елисей Изотов (2024-05-15 14:42:35+00:00): Здравствуйте. Исправил.
aq123 (2024-05-16 05:17:17+00:00): Что-то пока не видно
fititnt (2024-06-17 11:14:00+00:00): Olá @Smarzaro.

Por que você deletou amenity=school (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2402980577/history) adicionado por mapeador local há 8 anos?

No caso de elementos duplicados, o que é deletado é o objeto mais recente. E mesmo quando há contexto suficiente para fazer upgrade de pontos para áreas ou relations, o ponto original ainda é mantido https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history.
fititnt (2024-06-17 11:21:47+00:00): Correção: na verdade, foi adicionado há mais de 11 anos.

A way/1214048867 (que não foi criada por quem tenha conhecimento local, o que torna complicado saber exatamente quais prédios vazem ou não parte de uma amenity) nem mesmo parece bater com edificações visíveis em solo (tem algumas, mas estão cobertas por árvores).

O changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142302574 inclusive teve pergunta, sem resposta, qual seria fonte de "College Bom Jesus", que nem mesmo é mesmo nome do que já tinha sido mapeado anos atrás apenas como ponto.

Fico no aguardo por resposta.
Smarzaro (2024-06-17 14:10:45+00:00): Oi @fititnt, obrigado por chamar minha atenção. Depois de um tempo na mapatona o nível de atenção não é o mesmo. Você tem razão. Não era para ter apagado o ponto. Aproveitei e fui conferir com calma esse colégio. O nome estava incorreto. Corrigi pelos dados do IBGE2022. Também aprovetei para criar a área do colégio. Restaurei o ponto deletado e aproveitei-o como nó para entrada principal do colégio. Ficou uma dúvida se o prédio que tem um POI de clínica é um único prédio ou dois geminados. Deixei uma nota para algum mapeador local conferir. []'s
fititnt (2024-06-17 15:00:55+00:00): Ok. Estou tentando entender como você "corrigiu"

## Contexto
Sobre imagens de rua, essa não é uma rua de Arroio do Meio que tenha imagens com licença de uso aprovadas para OpenStreetMap.

Havia duas informações, ambas mapeadas pelo Fernando como apenas ponto:

- Uma clínica https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4297209306/history
- A escola de nome "Colégio Bom Jesus" https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2402980577/history

Sobre bases de dados do IBGE, tem a CNEFE 2022, mas ela contém pontos (não áreas). Note que não é possível assumir que tudo que está perto de uma escola, é um prédio de escolar ou que (mesmo que seja usado por alunos de uma escola) sejam da escola (ginásios esportivos podem na verdade ser algo de responsabilidade direta da prefeitura, que é responsável por pagar manutenção, enquanto a escola apenas usa).

## Agora perguntas sobre https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152805241

- Um prédio building=yes foi alterado para building=school https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1211689043/history . Como, se usou apenas pontos (sejam do mapeador local, ou do CNEFE) você consegue assumir que esse prédio é isso?
- Você adicionou uma área amenity=school https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1293091528 e (que não é citada por nenhum dos pontos anteriores na OSM) colocou source=IBGE,  mas se realmente existe pelo IBGE, pode por favor mostrar o local de download do https://www.ibge.gov.br de área?
Smarzaro (2024-06-17 16:20:29+00:00): A área foi adicionada pois pela imagem BING dá para verificar que existe conexão entre os prédios e que a área entre eles trata-se do pátio da escola (eu ia mapear como schoolyard, mas não há renderização para esse valor. Preferi deixar como leisure=playground). Veja que pelos fundos as edificações estão todas conectadas tratando-se de uma única grande área englobando os prédios. O nome do colégio veio da base do IBGE (https://ftp.ibge.gov.br/Cadastro_Nacional_de_Enderecos_para_Fins_Estatisticos/Censo_Demografico_2022/Arquivos_CNEFE/Municipio/43_RS/4301008_ARROIO_DO_MEIO.zip) por isso coloquei-o source. Realmente não há geometria de área do IBGE para o colégio, mas creio que há elementos suficientes na imagem de satélite para se chegar a esta conclusão. Quanto à clínica ela realmente existe no IBGE. Sua coordenada está bem próxima à edificação,  então acredito que o prédio seja realmente compartilhado ou geminado.  Atualizei seu nome e dados de endereçamento a partir do IBGE. Mapeei da forma que julguei correta com as informações disponíveis (Imagens BING e IBGE). Nenhuma licença foi violada. Caso tenha ficado alguma outra dúvida fique a vontade para entrar em contato. []'s
literan (2024-05-15 19:57:00+00:00): здесь все сносят. не рисуйте снесенные здания
emersonveenstra (2024-05-16 11:14:03+00:00): Reverted for Pokemon Go vandalism in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151402683
dogblog (2024-05-16 15:38:36+00:00): This is a beach that hasn’t been highlighted before but I have swam there with my children. This is NOT Pokémon Go vandalism.
emersonveenstra (2024-05-16 15:46:32+00:00): Apologies, I assumed that because you changed the entire section of the Detroit river to a beach, and drew the McKee beach across a parking lot, that it was vandalism. Feel free to redraw the McKee beach, but please make sure to accurately draw it so that it only covers the beach and not the parking lot. Thanks!
StreetSurveyor (2024-05-20 23:53:36+00:00): Nice catch! :)
rhtb0 (2024-05-15 04:41:29+00:00): Revert by adding non-existent water
EneaSuper (2024-05-15 08:56:23+00:00): Nome fica? 😂
GalPaolo981 (2024-05-15 09:23:14+00:00): I poteri del T9 😅
Loop120 (2024-05-26 18:39:07+00:00): Hey! I was looking at recent indoor mapping efforts and noticed something strange with the change here: the university relation that covers the whole campus is marked as "indoor=room" and no longer as "amenity=university". That can't be right! 😄
therealnope (2024-05-26 18:46:05+00:00): Oh my! You are correct, that is not right. I went ahead and fixed it. Thank you!
Shandhivya (2024-05-16 07:39:41+00:00): Thanks for updating the building footprints. #OMGURU
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151340934
MyoKyawKyaw (2024-05-29 11:29:20+00:00): Thank you for your contribution in mapping. This aquaculture ponds and waterways mapping look great and also the clear changeset comment. Keep Contributing, Cheers!!!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151341100
Supaplex (2024-05-15 06:15:31+00:00): 請問原先學校廢校了嗎?不然為何要整個校園範圍改成樹林?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151341155
Supaplex (2024-05-16 06:13:28+00:00): 已經在 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151389848
修正
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151341155
mcliquid (2024-05-15 06:45:15+00:00): Hi,

please note: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:web to
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
DareDJ (2024-05-15 08:38:01+00:00): Hello mcliquid,

This edit was unintentional.
Thank you very much for your comment and detailed explanation.

Happy mapping:)
map per (2024-06-01 19:17:07+00:00): I reviewed this changeset and moved the address in the Netherlands (that was the reason for the big boundary box) back to its original position. Now everything should be fine.
DareDJ (2024-06-03 07:12:55+00:00): Hi map per,

thank you very much.
Shandhivya (2024-05-16 07:28:30+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. #OMGURU
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151341895
gurglypipe (2024-05-15 08:45:24+00:00): (Following on from discussion on changeset 150711518)

Heya, thanks for doing more work to improve the map round here.

The tagging around Heather Garth still looks quite unconventional to me, and unconventional tagging leads to things on the map being misinterpreted.

I’m trying to work out if ‘Heather Garth’ is the name of a building, or of a street. As in, is the building there a block of flats called Heather Garth, with flats 1-6, which is on an unnamed (but private and operated by the owners of the flats) yard off Bank Street? Or is the building there actually a couple of separately numbered houses on a very short road which is called Heather Garth?

Or, put a different way, the map currently indicates that the address for one of the flats there would be:
1 Heather Garth [house name]
Heather Garth [road name]
Keswick
CA12 5JW

Another way of looking at the same question would be: can you confirm where exactly the name ‘Heather Garth’ is printed in that area? e.g. Is it on a house name plate by a front door, or on a road name sign, or both, or something else?

If I’ve interpreted things correctly, and the intention with this edit was to mark the gravel hardstanding as being owned by the Heather Garth apartments, then I suspect the correct tagging for that is to add the operator= tag to the hardstanding, rather than name=, and change it from highway=residential (which typically indicates a public road) to highway=service (which indicates something more private). In any case, the access tagging is correct on the hardstanding, from your previous edits here.

Looking forwards to having this little corner of Keswick ironed out :) Ta
Shandhivya (2024-05-16 07:23:22+00:00): Thank you for mapping. The mapping looks great and also the changeset comments. Keep up the mapping - many thanks! #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151342291
dvdhoven (2024-05-15 08:08:00+00:00): Ik heb de routes 22-22, 22-58, 58-73 en 69-81 omgezet naar network=rhn en route=horse.
Ze waren getagged met network=rcn en route=bicycle
Leken me toch paardroutes.

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
Peter Elderson (2024-05-15 09:15:31+00:00): Ja, paar kopieerfoutjes gemaakt. Ik was er ook net mee bezig maar jij was me voor!
woodpeck_repair (2025-05-05 12:43:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 165844238 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits
logus2 (2024-07-20 20:40:08+00:00): Low quality AI data is banned from Hanoi. Please refrain from doing so again.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154195288
Madi-Red (2024-07-23 08:54:09+00:00): Hi Logus2, 

Thank you for reverting the changesets. I referred to the Esri World Imagery in Hanoi. I would like to inform you that there is no AI intervention and all my changes uploaded manually by digitizing the building using JOSM Editor.
aTarom (2024-05-15 10:27:21+00:00): Hola, gracias por editar, el nodo
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/948415503/history
se ha desplazado por error? ahora no coincide el valor de elevación y según el mapa ráster del IGN muestra que en la anterior localización era correcta. Me dices algo por favor.
Saludos y feliz mapeo
eggie (2024-05-15 07:34:53+00:00): Dag Patrick    Zo te zien heb je gewoon een weg op een weg geplakt. Dat is niet de bedoeling.
Ik draai je edits weer even terug.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=151343474
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-05-15 07:40:59+00:00): reverted by changeset #151344681

Welke bebording staat hier?
Nu staat het ook open voor motorvoertuigen.
Alleen bicycle=no zal niet kloppen als je er wel mag brommeren en autorijden?
Deels zie ik access=no staan op wegen hier . Dat is een totaalverbod.. ook voor wandelaars. Of dat klopt weet ik niet.
MVG
eggie
Patrick2017 (2024-05-15 07:47:59+00:00): Dit pad is verboden voor fietsers en andere verkeer, anders dan wandelen.
eggie (2024-05-15 07:56:07+00:00): Oke... Dan kun je het best vehicle=no toevoegen
Ik heb de track waar de wandelroutes oplopen gesplitst zodat je dan makkelijk vehicle=no kunt toevoegen.
Dus niet een weg op een weg intekenen. 
Dat geldt dan voor alles met wielen.. behalve rolstoelen en kinderwagens.
Doe je het zelf.
Dus weg selecteren en tag accesstag toevoegen.
Success. Het geldt wellicht ook voor andere paden en tracks hier.
NeisBot (2024-05-15 07:20:05+00:00): Hi Nona88, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1283187824

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-15 13:49:02+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/151362305
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2024-05-15 07:12:48+00:00): 很感谢你编辑这个学校的信息和扩充数据，但学校范围不应整体列为建筑
Shandhivya (2024-05-16 06:13:35+00:00): Thank you for mapping. The mapping looks great and also the changeset comments. Keep up the mapping - many thanks! #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151343975
eggie (2024-05-15 07:43:06+00:00): Dag NaBaMu  Dit lijkt me allemaal niet correct wat je doet. Ik draai je edits terug.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=151343976

De kerk is geen klokkentoren, maar heeft er wellicht wel ergens een.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-05-15 07:49:24+00:00): De  klokkentoren heb ik als node toegevoegd
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2024-05-15 07:16:49+00:00): 无需介绍分类名称
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-15 13:48:45+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/151362313
eggie (2024-05-15 09:16:35+00:00): Dag tmk... 'k Denk als dit tijdelijk is dat die afkorting beter weg kan.

Hoe zit het met de toegang tot de rotonde?
Hoe lang gaan de werkzaamheden duren?

MV G
eggie
eggie (2024-05-15 09:19:28+00:00): In ieder geval je shortcut aangepast
eggie (2024-05-15 09:26:18+00:00): E1255297 A7 Purmerend Onbekend werktype
09 apr. 2024 14:02-16 jun. 2024 20:00
tmk787 (2024-05-15 10:20:31+00:00): Vanaf die nieuwe weg kan je niet op de rotonde komen die is er langs gebouwd deze weg ligt er tot 1 september tenzij de werkzaamheden vertraging oplopen
eggie (2024-05-15 10:26:04+00:00): Oke... we laten het even zo. De wegklasse en ligging heb ik aangepast .
Bron sat dataportaal.
Groet..
eggie
zorglubu (2024-05-15 13:31:43+00:00): Bonjour,

Pourrais-tu veiller à faire des modifications sur des zones plus petites, afin de ne pas polluer les zones surveillées non concernées ;-)
Merci.
LouisXIV (2026-04-27 19:21:10+00:00): Le tag "ele" est mal utilisé sur toutes ces éoliennes, il fallait utiliser "height" (ou "height:hub" ou "est_height").
"ele" c'est l'altitude depuis le niveau de la mer.
Tetryk (2024-05-15 15:36:20+00:00): Zdublowałeś relacje tram 11 tak, żeby nie pokazywał się błąd w osm-wtp, ale będą się one powielać w PTNA. Pozwolisz, że usunę twoje nowe relacje i naprawię stare, żeby zachować historię? Ale ja pracuję jak leniwiec w Zwierzogrodzie, więc trochę to potrwa.
frydzio (2024-05-15 15:45:34+00:00): Dzisiaj poprawili rozkład jazdy na stronie WTP i wszystkie kursy kończą się lub zaczynają na przystanku Sielce 05 tak więc można usunąć relacje zawierające przystanek Sielce 06.
frydzio (2024-05-15 15:56:34+00:00): Wcześniej były 3 relacje, ja utworzyłem 4 kolejne, a teraz powinny zostać 4 (czyli jedna nowa relacja powinna zostać)
frydzio (2024-05-15 15:59:13+00:00): Powinno zostać https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17596081, pozostałe do usunięcia. Starych nie trzeba edytować, bo zawierają Sielce 05.
Tetryk (2024-05-15 16:45:22+00:00): OK, tak zrobię.
NGlf (2024-05-15 08:03:15+00:00): Relative forum thread - https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/kozani-area/111883
toyotagps (2024-05-21 18:46:34+00:00): Объясните почему дороги физически не разделенные на проезжие части стали разделенными на карте?
kujpom (2024-05-15 08:13:20+00:00): Nieprawidłowe użycie tagu, szlak nie istnieje w terenie, nie jest oznakowany (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route%3Dbicycle)
Vinber-Pro (2024-05-15 08:19:14+00:00): erreur de ma part, mauvaise manip, je répare
Vinber-Pro (2024-05-15 14:49:13+00:00): annulé ici https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151365180
Vinber-Pro (2024-05-15 08:30:06+00:00): je pense que c'est plutôt une microbibliotheque ?
eggie (2024-05-15 09:10:10+00:00): Dag Wesbalt  Er staat ook nog proposed:ref	=S104

Daar voeg je aan toe ref=s104 
Wanneer proposed:ref niet meer geldt dan geldt toch alleen maar ref S104  met overigens  een hoofdletter?

oneway=no zetten we niet op reguliere wegen.
MVG
eggie
Wesbalt (2024-05-15 10:27:28+00:00): Beste Eggie, het is een S104 weg. Mijn opmerking betreft vooral dat voor dat ik of andere met een navigatie gebaseerd op kaarten van OSM altijd eerst mijn huis voorbij moeten rijden volgens de navigatie en dan een eind verderop moeten keren en pas dan bij mij voor het huis of op de oprit mogen parkeren. Dit is dus gewoon niet zo, je mag hier gewoon overal links en rechts afslaan naar de woningen toe. Wat de kaart verder ook niet vermeld is dat er ongeveer voor mijn huis een busstrook begint die doorloopt tot aan de bushalte en vervolgens overgaat in de strook voor rechts afslaand verkeer. Gezien jij vele wijzigingen hier aandraagt kun jij er misschien iets mee.
eggie (2024-05-15 10:39:18+00:00): Dag Wesbalt...

Je wijziging heb ik al doorgestuurd naar de voorgaande mapper die ook de infrastructuur doet van nieuwe wegen.
Dat was een edit uit 2021 Dus dat zal nu wel weer aangepast kunnen worden
Commentaar was Wegnummer S104 wordt (nog) niet bewegwijzerd. Daarom omgezet van ref naar proposed:ref. 
Dat zal dus straks bekeken worden. 

Dan de afslagen...  Welke zijstraten (namen) routeren niet?
Groet
eggie
eggie (2024-05-15 10:43:35+00:00): De Glimwormstraat staat met oneway=yes getagd...  Maar is dat zo?
eggie (2024-05-15 10:57:30+00:00): Althans de hele straat?
Wesbalt (2024-05-15 11:04:13+00:00): De fout zit in het stuk tussen kruising met grootstalselaan en de Marie Vuriestraat
Wesbalt (2024-05-15 11:04:41+00:00): Marie Curiestraat