piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2024-10-24 12:18:40+00:00): Please do not map temporary construction restrictions. OpenStreetMap is for permanent features and road networks. The rule of thumb is that, for any detour/closure less than one year, you can add a note with dates, but please do not change the network or add blocks because it will likely be forgotten when the construction works will be completed. There are other tools you can use to add construction/traffic and other real-time/temporary layers on top of openstreetmap layers.
Cerveira (2024-10-23 22:28:45+00:00): https://www.jn.pt/2908500135/obras-na-circular-de-barcelos-obrigam-a-desvio-na-nacional-103/
ollsarks (2024-10-23 22:33:55+00:00): Опираться на данные из википедии пока нельзя: они устарели, и в материалах статей об адм. округах и районов Новой Москвы нет актуальных данных, соответствующим действующему законодательству города Москвы
bbqman (2024-10-23 22:38:11+00:00): Incorrect changeset info. Should read: Added various details about Watermouth Lodges. Source: https://www.parkliferesorts.com/
Oregonian3 (2024-10-23 22:38:05+00:00): Note that some of the tracks I marked as private do cross public BLM land, but as far as I can tell there's no way to actually access these tracks without crossing private or closed tracks
kuhni74 (2025-02-09 19:10:07+00:00): Der note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3418156 zur Rofalschneide bzw. Rafalschneide war noch nicht wirklich geklärt, ein Tippfehler ist jetzt drin, und als "erledigt" wurde er auch nicht markiert. Kennst Du den Namen bzw. woher ist er belegt? Einfach durch ein WikiCommons-Bild entsteht m.E. noch keine belastbare Quelle.
Road–Runner (2025-02-12 18:08:36+00:00): Ist auch in der AV-Karte so vermerkt und ich habe den Namen auch auf einer Karte vor Ort als ich mal im Zillergrund war gesehen.
kuhni74 (2025-02-14 23:24:41+00:00): Okay, danke, ich korrigiere jetzt noch den Tippfehler.
Zandu (2024-10-25 23:13:36+00:00): Not an import. Manually drawn from averaged gps tracks displayed on Strava Heatmap and permitted for adding to OSM.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158273948
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-11-09 00:10:41+00:00): thats not a motorway
tekim (2024-10-24 17:48:18+00:00): @Spaghetti_Monster 's method of mapping is correct in this case. Areas that have holes, such as the fairway in this case, must be mapped as multipolygon relations.  See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon. Also, comments like "I fight the good fight" are not helpful.  Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
CurlingMan13 (2024-10-24 00:20:01+00:00): Blixt99 was reported to DWG for assistance.  I have had multiple encounters with this user regarding their poor changesets.
Enock4seth (2024-11-22 12:26:24+00:00): Hi and Welcome to OpenStreetMap. 

The name of features should be their name not a description of what they are. You can read more about names at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name

`natural=tree` tag already indicates this is a tree, there are other supporting tags that tell if it's a mango tree, coconut tree, etc, take a look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural=tree

Also mapping of trees that are of least importance might be a bit too much but doesn't mean you should not map them.

I hope this helps you to fix the trees mapped here with descriptive names.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:23:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:18:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:23:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:13:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:16:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
NorthCrab_upload (2024-10-24 00:11:52+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12282909704

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2024-10-24 00:11:53+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9461306684

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
b-holdet (2024-10-24 19:37:48+00:00): Kunne du ikke tage at diskutere dette her i stedet for at slette officielle data?

Hvorfor sletter du navnet?
b-holdet (2024-10-25 08:25:37+00:00): Hej Malene,

Du kan læse mere på denne side omkring navnet på den kilde, som du slettede.

https://gefin.ku.dk/q.php?p=danmarksstednavne/artikler/artikel/262429

Kan du give en grund til at du sletter den udover at du mener at området er privat?
CurlingMan13 (2024-10-24 04:35:17+00:00): Hello.  You have requested a review by checking the box upon changeset submission.

I have reviewed your changeset and have found it to be in good quality.

Keep up the good work!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158275188
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:15:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:19:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:20:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
Frans S (2024-10-28 12:58:52+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping. Good job.
about buildings under construction:
This is the correct tagging;
building=construction
construction=building. 
Check this wiki
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building=construction

Best regards
une abeille (2024-10-24 10:44:17+00:00): Hello! Thank you for contributing.

Please make sure to use a descriptive changeset comment; it helps with quality control. :)

If you will be mapping sidewalks in the Montréal area, could you please read my guide here? https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/une%20abeille/diary/402005
These guidelines will ensure that the data we add will be the most useful as possible for people with mobility limitations. You can also examine the sidewalks in areas Rosemont, where all of the sidewalks have been drawn to this standard.

Please also make sure you're using the correct offset for Bing imagery. For Montréal, this is 0.6,-1.54
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Montr%C3%A9al
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-03-26 08:55:01+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1327159243/history has building = pharmacy that was added in this edit
is it an attempt to map amenity=pharmacy ? How building constructed for pharmacy would be meaningfully distinct from other building=retail ?
EA Amakye (2026-03-26 09:09:03+00:00): This is a private building in progress. It is an uncompleted storey. The ground floor has been used as the pharmacy. 

I was not sure whether to select either a building or an amenity. Please advise.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-06-09 07:19:02+00:00): amenity=pharmacy
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-06-09 07:19:35+00:00): amenity=pharmacy
SomeoneElse (2024-10-24 01:13:06+00:00): Please grow up, the pair of you, and discuss in the forum.
tekim (2024-10-24 16:01:51+00:00): It seems that Blixt99 may not be familiar with the concept of multipolygons in OSM, or is mapping to fit a particular app, rather than by general OSM practices.
SomeoneElse (2024-10-24 01:12:45+00:00): Please grow up, the pair of you, and discuss in the forum.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-10-24 02:01:39+00:00): Blixt doesn't respond to any communication.
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=19615950
martianfreeloader (2024-11-26 20:39:44+00:00): Hi, I've reverted your edited as access=no seems wrong to me. I believe that:
- Pedestrians and cyclists can pass here
- Motor vehicles of Lek employees can also pass.

I hence added lift gates with a motor_vehicle=private tag
silversurfer83 (2024-10-24 17:18:52+00:00): Moin

ich beobachte deine Fleißarbeit bei Bad Hersfeld seit einiger Zeit und möchte nur sagen: Danke. Das sieht ziemlich gut aus und endlich verschwinden die weißen Flecken da drüben (ich hatte mich auch schon hin und wieder mal an ein paar Hektar gemacht, aber eigentlich andere Prioritäten).

happy mapping
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158276009
hca (2024-10-27 19:24:43+00:00): Danke :-)
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-08 03:53:08+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164659189
OddlyAngled (2024-10-24 04:31:22+00:00): there are only 11 instances of this tag worldwide, why the change? https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/shop=camp#overview
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158276872
quincylvania (2024-10-24 14:43:27+00:00): Camp stores are somewhat different from convenience stores so I've been updating these. Feel free to change it back if you want.
https://overpass-turbo.eu/?w=%22shop%22%3D%22camp%22+global&R
OddlyAngled (2024-10-24 19:57:48+00:00): what is the criteria being used? is there a proposal I can reference?
quincylvania (2024-10-24 20:49:30+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dcamp
CurlingMan13 (2024-10-24 04:34:26+00:00): Hello.  You have requested a review by checking the box upon changeset submission.

I have reviewed your changeset and have found it to be in good quality.

You can also do multiple edits in one changeset.  I usually do about 5-10minutes of mapping before saving, or before changing areas.

Keep up the good work!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158276919
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-11 16:14:49+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12283849102/history has shop = camp that was added in this edit
shop=camp ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop or https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Tag_descriptions_for_key_%22shop%22 fitting? Maybe new value needs to be invented? Maybe this data is wrong and there is no shop here? Maybe it is not a shop but something else?
quincylvania (2025-12-11 16:21:27+00:00): Hi Mateusz, I documented the meaning of this tag on the wiki page you linked, including what may be sold there. "Camp stores" are very common at North American campgrounds and don't fit well under other `shop` values.
Frans S (2025-02-08 16:29:26+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Sorry for the late respond.
 A remark. You clustered a lot of buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually. Please keep that in mind at future mappings.
Best regards and keep mapping
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-08 03:53:09+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164659189
Baloo Uriza (2024-10-24 13:22:15+00:00): Does the Northridge Cinema 8 actually stay open 24/7?  This seems highly unlikely.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158278127
Baloo Uriza (2024-10-24 13:49:15+00:00): Also looking on KS 27... was it recently repaved in concrete?  Aerial imagery seems to look like asphalt.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158278127
watmildon (2025-07-09 18:00:06+00:00): Thanks for adding these details!!
mueschel (2024-10-25 08:34:41+00:00): Please check your recent edits. There are dozens of "motercycle" tags by you and your colleagues.
AzuisRiver (2024-10-25 23:01:04+00:00): Thank you for identifying and informing me about this issue. The incorrect motercycle=yes have been updated to motorcycle=yes tags here but I will help ensure that they are corrected across all of Indonesia as soon as possible - Best.
tastrax (2024-10-26 11:02:38+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, +61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features#Phone_Numbers .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
Rowan_AU (2024-10-26 11:11:49+00:00): Thanks for the correction, I will be sure to add phone numbers according to the correct format going forward.
CurlingMan13 (2024-10-24 04:32:39+00:00): You'll need to come back and square these corners.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158278753
CurlingMan13 (2024-10-24 04:32:02+00:00): don't forget to square the corners.  You'll want to revisit this house.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158278768
CurlingMan13 (2024-10-24 04:31:20+00:00): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xvegS6xDmKE&list=RDEM36RTMaPK6X2lSLTAvTGudA&index=46
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158278788
CurlingMan13 (2024-10-24 04:27:33+00:00): Hello.  You have requested a review by checking the box upon changeset submission.

I have reviewed your changeset and have found it to be in good quality.

You can use the hotkey "q" while the building is selected to square the corners instead of right-clicking.  You can also do multiple buildings in one changeset.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158278800
CurlingMan13 (2024-10-24 04:24:39+00:00): Hello.  You have requested a review by checking the box upon changeset submission.

I have reviewed your changeset and have found it to be in good quality.

You can use the hotkey "q" while the building is selected to square the corners instead of right-clicking.  You can also do multiple buildings in one changeset.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158278821
CurlingMan13 (2024-10-24 04:23:24+00:00): Hello.  You have requested a review by checking the box upon changeset submission.

I have reviewed your changeset and have found it to be in good quality.

You can use the hotkey "q" while the building is selected to square the corners instead of right-clicking.  You can also do multiple buildings in one changeset.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158278842
CurlingMan13 (2024-10-24 04:20:18+00:00): Hello.  You have requested a review by checking the box upon changeset submission.

I have reviewed your changeset and have found it to be in good quality.

You can use the hotkey "q" while the building is selected to square the corners instead of right-clicking.  You can also do multiple buildings in one changeset.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158278870
CurlingMan13 (2024-10-24 04:23:06+00:00): Hello.  You have requested a review by checking the box upon changeset submission.

I have reviewed your changeset and have found it to be in good quality.

You can use the hotkey "q" while the building is selected to square the corners instead of right-clicking.  You can also do multiple buildings in one changeset.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158278890
CurlingMan13 (2024-10-24 04:22:37+00:00): Hello.  You have requested a review by checking the box upon changeset submission.

I have reviewed your changeset and have found it to be in good quality.

You can use the hotkey "q" while the building is selected to square the corners instead of right-clicking.  You can also do multiple buildings in one changeset.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158278925
cdsbsbccomse (2024-10-24 04:17:23+00:00): https://cdsbsbc.com.se/
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1BZbbIrTO-A-35lyAh7Xjy3KpZF_FkfND
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1N68ufvdIzkVx13cnd6PrnGEz725iHHr2A-MIvraUzgU/edit?usp=drivesdk
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1Nwd9zHnV_uy8YXuJU1F49OMBjzmTTXli
https://sites.google.com/view/cdsbsbccomse/home
https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer?mid=1KpmmpIINSvmWwVWpUSGJ-3KoQ5NidcM
https://cdsbsbccomse.blogspot.com/2024/10/bong88.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JOY-3fP0BMc
https://x.com/cdsbsbccomse/status/1849119282892067233
https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/nh-ci-bong888/episodes/Bong88---Truy-Cp-An-Ton--Nhanh-Chng--Khng-Lo-B-Chn-e2q1v7i
https://www.scoop.it/topic/bong88-by-nha-cai-bong88-1/p/4161934071/2024/10/23/bong88-website-ca-cuoc-uy-tin-hang-au-chau-a
CurlingMan13 (2024-10-24 04:30:31+00:00): Hello.  You have requested a review by checking the box upon changeset submission.

I have reviewed your changeset and have found it to be in good quality.

You can also do multiple buildings in one changeset.  I usually do about 5-10minutes of mapping before saving, or before changing areas.

Keep up the good work!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158279218
CurlingMan13 (2024-10-24 04:30:08+00:00): Hello.  You have requested a review by checking the box upon changeset submission.

I have reviewed your changeset and have found it to be in good quality.

You can also do multiple buildings in one changeset.  I usually do about 5-10minutes of mapping before saving, or before changing areas.

Keep up the good work!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158279245
Vaidotas (2024-10-30 17:03:22+00:00): noexit žymos čia nepakanka, kad užblokuoti pravažiavimą. OSM navigacija ir toliau sėkmingai siūlo važiuoti šiuo įvažiavimu.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2717788354
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:23:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:16:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:11:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:22:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
Frans S (2024-10-24 13:26:40+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
You mapped traces of a waterway in between agricultural land. 
This is not a river, At best, a canal or a ditch.
I corrected it.
This is a building and highway project. No need to map waterways.

Best regards
Frans
Global Validator
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2024-10-24 12:09:50+00:00): Hi! Please explain why you removed this access to the shop? Now a car going from the shop to Chemin Saint-Marie can't reach it and must turn right on Boulevard Saint-Charles and make a large detour, which is not what would happen in real life. Customers can and would continue straight on Chemin Sainte-Marie at the traffic light.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2024-10-24 12:12:52+00:00): I added it back with restrictions and oneway to make sure routing is not broken here.
Kaduna (2024-10-25 10:55:13+00:00): Hi ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy,
Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you.
Kaduna (2024-10-29 07:20:26+00:00): Thank you for reverting the changeset as, based on your feedback, I do see the routing problem that I had made for customers exiting the shop.  I think that the connector from the shop towards Chemin Sainte-Marie street is redundant, since there is no physical divider between the carriageways.  To address this, I propose to adjust slightly to the north the east node on the connector that is on the North bound Boulevard Saint-Charles running from Chemin Sainte-Marie to bring it closer to the shop driveway exit.  I would then delete the now redundant one-way service road that is connecting the North bound Boulevard Saint-Charles from the shop to the South bound Boulevard Saint-Charles.   I would be interested to hear your feedback on my proposed solution before I apply it.  Thank you in advance.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2024-10-29 10:31:01+00:00): The issue associated with moving the main road toward the shop access road is that it would create an artifical angle which could cause some truck routing softwares to think the turn radius is very large, when it is not. It is preferable to keep the main road angle as close as the real angle as possible. I understand that adding the connection between the main road and the shop access road is artificial too, but it concerns a less important road (the service road). Can you explain how this intersection was tagged as problematic? The service road has the access tag set to "customers", which should make sure routing engines do not use it for through traffic. Please explain which bug/issue this configuration caused exactly in your software suite. Thanks!
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2024-10-29 10:42:46+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158491446 connected the access service road to the main road as you asked. However I still think it is far fetched and the angle is too large. I still would like to know more how this intersection was flagged in your software. Thanks!
Kaduna (2024-10-29 11:53:06+00:00): Hi ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy,
Thank you for your explanation. I will come back to you with a requested detail.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-10-25 23:39:28+00:00): reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158358188