piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
joost schouppe (2025-10-08 08:50:14+00:00): Are you sure this place actually produces electricity?
Gegenwind84 (2025-10-08 09:56:00+00:00): Hi Joost, 
das HKW Ornberg der Mainova steht im HLNUG Emissionskataster als Betriebsstätte 00464260412 mit 5340000Kg CO2 für das Jahr 2020 drin. Ob es aktuell läuft, weiß ich nicht. Aber die Region wird von der Mainova als Fernwärmeregion „Oberer Ornberg“ (Präungesheim, Frankfurter Berg, Berkersheim) gefasst und das wäre das einzige mir bekannte Heizkraftwerk in der Region.
joost schouppe (2025-10-08 11:27:53+00:00): I'm not sure what you're trying to say. My question was not "is this place still operational", but rather a concern that I think maybe this is a place that only produces heat and not electricity (which you added as an output of the facility)
Koreller (2025-07-07 11:55:56+00:00): Archabil Hotel*
d3mol3k (2025-07-07 18:23:52+00:00): Cześć Artur - odcinek Powstańców Wlkp. pomiędzy Frysztacką a Szpitalna jest udostępniony do ruchu dla pojazdów budowy i dojazd do posesji, na moscie na Budziszyńskiej ruch został  przełożony na stronę zachodnią - wgrywam do mapilary dzisiejszą przejażdżkę tym zmienionym odcinkiem jutro powinna być już gotowa to dam link do niej
d3mol3k (2025-07-07 21:58:48+00:00): Poprawiłem i dodałem lokalizacje przystanków.
wizja lokalna: https://www.mapillary.com/app/user/d3mol3k?lat=53.4086915&lng=14.5241801&z=18.643344244906157&focus=photo&all_coverage=false&pKey=722144980736448
StC (2025-07-18 20:38:39+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre qui passe par là (suppression / recréation d'un morceau de route sans le remettre dans la relation). Je m'occupe de la réparation.
Lyon-St-Clair (2025-11-08 10:46:56+00:00): le GTFS qui met cette ligne N3 en disused c'est une erreur
mga_geo (2025-11-08 17:00:50+00:00): Ce n'était pas une erreur cet été.
Lyon-St-Clair (2025-11-08 21:20:43+00:00): oui ben ça pose un souci car la ligne est suspendue l'été puis repart en septembre, on est en novembre et la ligne apparaissait toujours en disused.
rarad74 (2025-07-08 11:09:55+00:00): Please DO NOT change again Strada Tabacari. DJ104D not come into that roudabout. It conntinues forward. The part that comes into that roundabpout is a limited acces street. Thank you.
StreetSurveyor (2025-07-17 22:07:42+00:00): Hi! This is incorrect. They were previously tagged correctly as parking aisles.
Brentar (2025-07-18 13:03:20+00:00): Hi StreetSurveyor, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you.
Brentar (2025-07-19 02:37:39+00:00): Hi StreetSurveyor, thank you for reaching out and making the corrections. I'll take your feedback into account for future edits.
ChrissW-R1 (2025-07-09 21:24:51+00:00): Please check https://osm.org/note/4846839
Negreheb (2025-08-21 14:04:36+00:00): Bitte kein Zeugs einfach verschieben oder mappen, damits auf der osm.org Karte besser aussieht - Es gibt gefühlt 3.000 Renderer und für jeden müsstest du das anders verschieben :D
user_5359 (2025-07-08 15:06:31+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1413022439. What is the mean of the tag wip = true?
Philip Newton (2025-07-08 18:13:39+00:00): Hello! WIP is "work in progress". I was building the outside of the multipolygon for the forest step by step. But I can't save a line without tags, so I tagged it as a WIP.

I've now completed the outer line and removed the WIP tag.

(I had to make it as two lines otherwise it would have had too many points.)

Thank you for your interest in my work!
aceman444 (2025-11-16 22:16:23+00:00): Zdravim, aky zmysel ma tato zmena? KR PZ uz bolo zakreslene, na https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/75070396 . Naco ste ho zduplikovali?
Taktiez bod ako https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12985533229 nema existovat, je zbytocny. Rovnako https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12985533233 je naco dobry? Aj tak sa Vam prekryva parkovisko s budovou.

A tie nazvy Lev 1 a 2 maju aky zaklad? Alebo ste si ich vymysleli? Ako zdroj uvadzate len snimky a tam tie nazvy urcite nevidite.
aceman444 (2025-11-16 22:22:16+00:00): A ta hodnota access=permit chcelo znamenat co presne? Tam moze parkovat kazdy, len si musi ziskat povolenie? Prijazdove cesty k tomu parkovisku uz maju vyznacene vehicle=private, takze sukromny pristup vlastnika alebo s jeho povolenim. Preco je zrazu parkovisko verejne pristupne?
perusluku (2025-07-07 12:53:14+00:00): According to news it should be one way for this summer and next, but haven't been there yet. Are there no signs?
NeisBot (2025-07-07 12:54:34+00:00): Hi chart2006, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 99% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 6 highway(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=168603910
chart2006 (2025-07-08 15:44:00+00:00): They're paths/trails that are no longer authorized or official.  They were decommissioned either for traversing private property where the owner asked they not or they're too difficult to maintain.
NeisReview (2025-07-08 16:03:55+00:00): Thank you for your private message and for confirming that the deletions were intentional.

However, the fact that a path or way is not public does not necessarily justify its deletion. In OpenStreetMap, we use access tags to indicate whether a road or path is private.

Could you please undo your changes, or would you like assistance with this?

Ideally, an access=private tag should be added to the paths.

You can read some more here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property
and here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F

Best regards.
chart2006 (2025-08-01 14:47:03+00:00): My apologies for the delayed response, I didn't get a notification indicating you had responded.  The trails are maintained/managed by Huntsville Area Mountain Bikers (HAMR) in coordination with Monte Sano State Park and the North Alabama Land Trust.  I am part of the trail committee for HAMR and work extensively with both the state park and land trust.  The trails I deleted were decommissioned several years ago by all parties involved. Some trails were too difficult to maintain while others were removed at the request of the property owners.  The trails that traversed private property were originally approved by the owners but some owners ended up putting their property up for sale and asked that we remove them, so we did.  

The point is, I'm part of the organization that manages the trails on Monte Sano and we decommissioned/removed them several years ago for the reasons mentioned above - they’re not authorized by land managers or property owners.
NeisBot (2025-07-07 13:21:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-07-18 05:24:31+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/169089554
goedegazelle (2025-07-09 13:22:31+00:00): The tags that you've added describe whether an amenity is covered and not whether it is inside a building.

You might want to consider using "location=indoor/outdoor" instead of "covered=yes."
ivanma (2025-07-09 23:42:45+00:00): That's because I selected "covered but not inside option" in StreetComplete. ATMs are located under the roof/arch attached to the building, so they can't be considered fully inside or outside.
NeisBot (2025-07-07 13:45:48+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-07-18 05:23:16+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/168626253
Patchanka (2025-07-07 16:25:27+00:00): bonjour et bienvenue

merci pour la mise à jour des lampadaires à Anglet. Cependant je souhaite attirer votre attention sur la source de vos contributions, qui n'est pas du tout optimale et donc vous créez probablement des données déjà obsolètes.

En effet je vois indiqué BD Ortho et Mapillary. 

Savez-vous que la BD Ortho date de 2021 ? Sur le secteur on a l'Ortho express qui date de 2024 et surtout la photo faite par la ville d'Anglet qui date de février 2025 avec un excellente résolution.

Pour ce qui concerne l'imagerie de rue, les photos dans Mapillary datent pour la plupart de 2023. Or il y a dans Panoramax des photos beaucoup plus récentes (2024 voire 2025).

Il est important d'utiliser les sources les plus récentes et qualitatives et ce n'est pas ce qui manque sur Anglet en particulier :-)

J'ai constaté aussi quelques soucis sur le positionnement des objets à savoir par exemple ce lampadaire au milieu de la rue : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12969648783

ou encore ce lampadaire accroché sur le tracé du trottoir ici : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12969648784

Merci de prendre en compte ces remarques avant de continuer à ajouter massivement des objets dans OSM (389 modifs en 2 jours de contrib, c'est beaucoup !)

Je vous envoie quelques infos complémentaires en MP.

Bonne soirée
FMC-Henri (2025-07-07 14:14:53+00:00): Wenn ich mir den nördlichen Teil der Ilsestraße anschaue, dann scheint dies auch eine Fahrradstraße zu sein: Bspw.: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1036561541780931&focus=photo&x=0.7140190260722207&y=0.4477966338693646&zoom=0&lat=52.4715562&lng=13.4348669&z=17
tordans (2025-07-07 15:38:11+00:00): @Henri ist auch inzwischen so erkannt https://tilda-geo.de/regionen/infravelo?map=16.3/52.471/13.4344&config=l6jzgk.5ount1.4&v=2. Das fehlte kürzlich wegen Caching-Fehlern.

Bitte noch ergänzen:
mapillary, ideal source:traffic_sign:mapillary, markings links|rechts und buffer links|recht um die Buffer zu parkenden Autos auszuwerten.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168606795
NeisBot (2025-07-07 14:00:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-07-18 05:22:32+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/169089519
FMC-Henri (2025-07-07 14:25:57+00:00): Ich sehe ein Schild "Geh- und Radwege Schäden", ich würde sagen, dass es sich auf die Radwege-Spange bezieht: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1036561541780931&focus=photo&x=0.7140190260722207&y=0.4477966338693646&zoom=0&lat=52.4715562&lng=13.4348669&z=17

Würdest du das auch so beurteilen?
FMC-Henri (2025-07-07 14:26:53+00:00): * https://www.mapillary.com/app/?z=18.909379867793103&lat=52.42078480000001&lng=13.460908700000005&pKey=1229297041521714&focus=photo&x=0.4434814518821537&y=0.561971104953843&zoom=0
FMC-Henri (2025-07-07 14:45:37+00:00): Ahh sehe gerade, ist gar kein Teil des Radvorrangnetzes ;)
mcliquid (2025-07-07 14:48:23+00:00): Ja, linksseitig macht es keinen Sinn, da dort kein Radweg vorhanden ist. 
Das Schild ist zum einen noch nicht im OSM Traffic Sign verfügbar, siehe auch: https://github.com/osmberlin/osm-traffic-sign-tool/issues/78

Des weiteren hat es ohne "Hauptzeichen" nach meinem Verständnis der StVO gar keine rechtliche Aussagekraft, da Zusatzzeichen nur mit Hauptzeichen gültig sind.

Kurzum: Wie würdest du es eintragen wollen? Nur mit `hazard=damaged_road` (wie von mir vorgeschlagen) oder ein `traffic_sign=DE:Freitext:Rad_u._Gehweg-schäden"?
keyyushi (2025-07-18 20:49:17+00:00): Göksu Parkı'nın İhlas Caddesi tarafındaki rezervuar (Su) haritalandırmanızın kaynağı nedir? Bing Maps Aerial'de orada su gözükmemekte. Ayrıca, lütfen iD Editör'ün gösterdiği hataları dikkate alın.

Ek olarak, Ankara için Esri World Imagery çok daha tutarlı. Lütfen bundan sonraki düzenlemelerinizi Esri'ye göre yapın (Bing kullanıp Esri'ye göre konumlandırabilirsiniz.). Buna göre bazı düzenlemelerinizi tekrar düzenledim.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169128039
dcapillae (2025-07-07 14:54:30+00:00): Buenas tardes.

Esta entrada no se llama así. El nombre del establecimiento debe ir en el nodo que lo define.

Atentamente,
Daniel Capilla
NeisBot (2025-07-07 14:06:57+00:00): Hi Erdemtan13, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Added parking aisle infrastructure by creating new nodes and a way, and modifying an existing way to include service=parking_aisle and highway=service tags."

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish #AIgenerated
simer_lkpg (2025-07-09 20:24:54+00:00): Är dessa byggnader verkligen fysiskt rivna? Om byggnaderna är kvar ska de inte tas bort, och konstaterar att de fortfarande är kvar på Lantmäteriets kartor.
simer_lkpg (2025-07-09 20:26:06+00:00): Även lite konstigt att du tar bort Skogåshallens byggnad för att därefter lägga till Skogåshallen som en punkt.
Fjellrev (2025-10-26 18:14:44+00:00): Skolan finns kvar https://www.huddinge.se/ostragrundskolan blir en revert till
simer_lkpg (2025-10-26 18:19:06+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168607414 kan nog också undersökas.
Fjellrev (2025-10-26 18:56:12+00:00): Även den blev reverterad. Gick genom alla ändringar han har gort (inte så många), blev en eller annan till...
ayxis (2025-07-07 14:14:15+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168434029
Sorain (2025-07-10 03:06:24+00:00): Observ ca mapezi cladiri random, fara nicio noima sau logica. O cladire o mapezi drept 3 cladiri, geometria la plezneala, fara vreo coerenta. Daca continui asa, voi da revert la aceste mizerii
cassette8778 (2025-07-10 08:39:17+00:00): Ce ar trebui să fac pentru a-mi repara greșelile?
empty_child (2025-07-07 20:36:06+00:00): Добрый день iron37,
Пожалуйста, не добавляйте "(бывш. <...>)" в теги name. У нас для бывших названий есть охапка тегов old_name, которые поддерживают как языковые ключи (old_name:ru), так и привязку ко времени (old_name:ru:1953-1990). Если можете, верните сами. Иначе позже сделаю сам
EfreetSK (2026-04-29 15:05:53+00:00): To je pravda no je tam určite pictogram na ceste, nedávno som tamadiaľ išiel. Pridám tam 
cycleway:both 	shared_lane
cycleway:both:lane 	pictogram

A tiež to zmením z track na unclassified - vyzerá že ten track tam bol nastavený keď bol surface dirt. Teraz už je to normálna asfaltová cesta
vasony (2025-07-20 07:09:30+00:00): Szia!

Honnan derül ki, hogy pont ez a Vadrózsa utca, a rendelet amit megadtál, csak az utcalistát tartalmazza.

Tamás
Térképszerkesztő (2025-07-28 11:59:23+00:00): Szia!

Ügyfelünk jelezte, a rendelet a névhasználatot bizonyítja.

Zoli
Leo Slager (2025-07-07 16:57:53+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Leo Slager (2025-07-07 17:02:13+00:00): Hoi,

alle data van het restaurant staan netjes op de address-node.
Dan behoeft amenity=restaurant niet ook nog eens op het gebouw te staan.
ik pas het even aan.
osm802943 (2025-07-07 17:04:47+00:00): Dank!
silversurfer83 (2025-07-07 18:58:37+00:00): Hi :)

die HsNr 1 ist schon am Hauptgebäude getaggt. Gibt es einen besonderen Grund, warum dieses Nebengebäude auch die Hausnummer benötigt?

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168609476
user_18023081 (2025-07-07 14:54:40+00:00): Not for service roads
AndreaDp271 (2025-07-07 23:04:32+00:00): Please save your changes more frequently and avoid making such large changeset areas. Thank you
tordans (2025-07-07 15:35:13+00:00): Hi! For https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/836874709, please add source:width=*, traffic_sign=none, mapillary=*

Similar for other changes.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168609880
fmc_6 (2025-07-07 15:56:55+00:00): Hi, since I didn't enter the width here, do I still have to specify the source for this? If so, where can I find it? (Changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/89368674)

And how exactly should the Mapillary key be used if there are multiple images from both sides? The start and end of each OSM way with two Mapillary IDs separated by a semicolon?
fabiotofy (2025-07-18 20:31:51+00:00): Ciao buona sera. Per la gestione del multilingua esistono già da tempo i tag specifici. Nel campo "name", che è quello che finisce in "stampa" sulla mappa va riportato ciò che gli utenti poi, usando la mappa per ciò che è nata ovvero orientarsi sul territorio, trovano effettivamente presente in loco. Una tabella affissa con tutti questi 4 nomi consecutivi io sinceramente non l'ho mai vista nella nostra Regione. Riportiamo un pò di sobrietà, non ha senso "gonfiare" il campo "NAME" con liste multilingue degne di un convegno ONU.
Alessandro Ambrosino (2025-07-19 08:47:55+00:00): Buongiorno, 

So bene che esistono i tag specifici per i nomi. Ma in realtà il progetto di inserire i nomi plurilingui su openstreetmaps rientra in un progetto dell'ARLEF, fatto con il Network to Promote Linguistic Diversity, come può vedere sul mio profilo. Io sono solo un volontario, ma l'idea del progetto era dare visibilità al plurilinguismo che ci caratterizza, soprattutto viste le ultime notizie con il caso dei cartelli alla stazione di Cividale/Cividât/Čedad. Per mettere i nomi bilingui ho seguito la lista dei toponimi ufficiali presente sul sito dell'ARLEF. Non vorrei iniziare una edit war, ma sarebbe carino mantenere il lavoro fatto, soprattutto perché non ha dato fastidio a nessuno, e sono già 11-12 giorni che ho finito. Grazie della comprensione.
fabiotofy (2025-07-19 21:24:26+00:00): È una bella iniziativa e credo debba essere valorizzata come si deve magari andando a creare anche una cartografia ad hoc per il progetto. Su OSM magari possono esserci anche altre priorità, come avere una carta più possibile leggibile e che aiuti effettivamente chi la usa ad orientarsi sul territorio. Perché alla fine le mappe nascono per questo, per navigare in posti che non si conoscono. Ecco perché nel campo name va inserita la toponomastica come visibilmente esposta lungo la viabilità. Nessun edit war, rimaniamo però coerenti con le scelte della comunità di osm. Nel campo name si scrive ciò che si vede. Un saluto
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168609887
Alessandro Ambrosino (2025-07-19 21:35:28+00:00): Perfetto, grazie! Comunque ho segnalato alcune coordinate dove il bilinguismo si vede (Gorizia, Sagrado, Gradisca, Cervignano, Palmanova e Ialmicco, tra le altre). Per quel che riguarda la Regione, in realtà in consiglio regionale la scritta è in quattro lingue. 

Anche google maps, fra l'altro, è poco aggiornato. Molte immagini di street view risalgono al 2023, ma in questi due anni sono stati installati i cartelli bilingui in quasi tutte le località regionali. 

In un certo senso, il progetto di far vedere le quattro lingue anche nel campo "nome" è simile a quello della Sardegna, dove i cartelli bilingui in realtà non ce li hanno...

Comunque grazie dei chiarimenti, buona serata!
fabiotofy (2025-07-19 22:03:05+00:00): A disposizione. Segnalo inoltre utile,  prima di effettuare un numero così consistente ed impattante di modifiche, un confronto con il gruppo di mappatori di osm del fvg. Basta mandarci una mail a: talk-it-fvg@openstreetmap.org Cerchiamo sempre assieme di fare il meglio il che possiamo per la mappa! Tutto volontariamente e secondo le proprie passioni e specifiche conoscenze o interessi di ciascuno. A presto, spero di risentirti lì nel gruppo di mailing list
Alessandro Ambrosino (2025-07-19 22:18:48+00:00): Mille grazie! Sì, questa è una buona idea. Vi scriverò lì appena possibile. 

A presto
Alessandro
Leo Slager (2025-07-07 17:04:33+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Udarian (2025-07-07 20:37:12+00:00): I have asked you this before, when you add landuse attached to multipolygons, please do that landuse as multipolygons.
Udarian (2025-07-07 20:36:15+00:00): I have asked you this before, when you add landuse attached to multipolygons, please do that landuse as multipolygons.
Udarian (2025-07-07 20:36:28+00:00): I have asked you this before, when you add landuse attached to multipolygons, please do that landuse as multipolygons.
ArizonaMapper (2025-07-07 20:41:35+00:00): I honestly do not understand why that canal is a multipolygon. I'm just adding nodes in iD, there is no need for the new polygon to be a multipolygon at the moment.
Udarian (2025-07-07 22:31:00+00:00): It is a multipolygon first and foremost because it is land cover and the best way to do land cover (and land use) is multipolygon, though second of all it is a multipolygon is because parts of it span large areas so editing one of the ways that make up its edge does not make the changeset geographic area unnecessarily large, and last but not least the multipolygon represents the whole of the area the canal takes up and since it is one canal it is one area and thus the best way to represent it, as one single object in the database. 

Again adding non multipolygons attached to a multipolygon makes it significantly harder and time consuming to fix and update so I would greatly appreciate it if you would do them as multipolygon from the get go. Again this is land use and thus should be done as multipolygon.