piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2026-03-30 15:24:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 27 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/299682396 v16 | 15 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1148798205 v4 | 6 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1148798203 v4 | 3 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/3037238155 v3
https://osm.org/node/10688045254 v2
https://osm.org/node/3037238159 v4

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180635483
Kayson01 (2026-05-17 09:11:52+00:00): EN: Hello, thank you for your contributions. However, I noticed that the edits have caused conflicts between the building and the surrounding roads. This area had already been edited quite well in previous versions and was already fairly complete.
VN: Xin chào, rất vui vì những đóng góp của bạn. Tuy nhiên tôi nhận thấy việc chỉnh sửa đã gây ra xung đột giữa tòa nhà và các con đường xung quanh. Khu vực này đã được chỉnh sửa rất tốt từ những phiên bản trước và đã khá hoàn thiện.
NeisBot (2026-03-30 15:27:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13435267424 v4

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Barber Shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisAgent (2026-03-30 16:33:18+00:00): 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again?
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-04 12:19:41+00:00): Reverted series of changesets adding SEO POI and blatantly promotional description=* and other malformed tags to it

https://osm.org/changeset/185088150
Hervé TUC (2026-04-16 08:03:38+00:00): Salut,
Attention à ne pas supprimer le tag building=yes de l'Hospice de France ; sinon bah y a plus de bâtiments 😄
Je l'ai remis 👍

Par ailleurs en indiquant le tag tourism=alpine_hut sur le même objet que le bâtiment on indique que TOUT le bâtiment est un refuge. Je ne me rappelle plus bien mais je ne suis pas sûr de ça, il y a peut-être une partie du bâtiment qui n'est pas consacré au refuge. À ce moment-là il faudrait plutôt ajouter un point avec tourism=alpine_hut et toutes les infos afférentes ; mais ça je ne suis pas sûr donc je n'ai pas modifié.

À+
PikaMap (2026-04-17 18:43:53+00:00): Salut Hugues,

Merci d’avoir corrigé mon erreur sur building=yes. Je ne comprends pas pourquoi j’ai supprimé ce tag, ça ne fait pas vraiment sens; j’ai sans doute fait une mauvaise manipulation. Je ferai plus attention la prochaine fois :)

Concernant tourism=alpine_hut, je pense que ce tag n’est pas adapté. Il était déjà présent avant ma modification, donc j’ai préféré ne pas y toucher. En réalité, l’Hospice de France correspond plutôt à un hôtel-restaurant, et le site ne fait d’ailleurs aucune mention de « refuge » : https://www.hospice-de-france.fr/
Hervé TUC (2026-04-19 07:57:35+00:00): Pour le tag alpine_hut je ne sais pas trop.
Si j'avais eu à créer le tag je pense que moi aussi j'aurais choisi hotel et restaurant ; mais comme alpine_hut est déjà là je ne vais pas le modifier. Et puis ça correspond aussi à alpine_hut, c'est-à-dire en montagne, avec principalement des lits en dortoirs. Je pense qu'on est ici dans la zone de contact entre hotel et alpine_hut donc bon...
Wildsharky (2026-04-01 12:54:28+00:00): Revert of 180636148
NeisBot (2026-03-30 15:42:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13547250487 v5

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Hallmark gift shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisAgent (2026-03-31 05:40:51+00:00): 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again?
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-04 12:19:02+00:00): Reverted series of changesets adding SEO POI and blatantly promotional description=* and other malformed tags to it

https://osm.org/changeset/185088070
iandees (2026-03-30 16:17:54+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4873972407 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180637822, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
felipeeugenio (2026-03-30 16:25:54+00:00): Hola. Al traspasar todas las propiedades de la iglesia al edificio solamente, estás diciendo que en el patio interior no estás en la iglesia. Hay que tener ojo con este tipo de ediciones. mejor agregar un polígono que encierre e incluya todo.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180636629
NeisBot (2026-03-30 15:56:15+00:00): 🌍 Welcome to OSM, Justabillatnothing.
Thanks for contributing!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

✅ Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added no-exit information"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment
Wildsharky (2026-04-01 12:42:28+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:180656142
eggie (2026-03-30 17:50:46+00:00): Welcome to OSM..

Thnaks for your contribution. 
Please use English or Dutch in the location tag.

Greetz,
eggie
John Kastner (2026-03-31 02:12:05+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1494360736 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1494360735 overlap with https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1462831419 which probably should've been detected during the import. I've gone ahead and deleted these.
John Kastner (2026-03-31 02:17:37+00:00): also https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1494360737
M-NCPPC_Import (2026-03-31 12:07:16+00:00): Thank you for clearing that up, John!
eggie (2026-03-30 18:05:09+00:00): Dag Delight,
De tarieven veranderen doorlopend. 
In de wiki wordt gewoon fee= yes no genoemd. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=parking

MVG
eggie
Comino (2026-03-30 16:50:57+00:00): Hi,

Please include country code in the phone number syntax.

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
BTC Map
Fraxi (2026-03-30 16:21:27+00:00): Възможно е да има грешка в кадастъра, да знаеш.
Dimitar155 (2026-03-30 17:23:49+00:00): Те и табелите може да са грешни. Остава варианта да хвърлям боб 🙃
Negreheb (2026-05-05 22:13:05+00:00): Puh, also ein Bank braucht wirklich keine Adresse. Kann ja auch keine Post da zugestellt werden :D 

Die Wash me Station seh ich ein, aber da lieber https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:object:* nutzen statt addr:*=*. Ich habs schon mal geändert und die Adresse von der Bank gelöscht.
NeisBot (2026-03-30 16:12:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/128290597 v15

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Brewery"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisAgent (2026-03-31 05:40:52+00:00): 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again?
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-04 12:15:07+00:00): Cleaned up remaining SEO spam and non-standard tags in changeset 185087960

https://osm.org/changeset/185087960
felipeeugenio (2026-03-30 16:27:17+00:00): Hola. Building= es para las estructuras, no para el complejo completo.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180637736
VictorIE (2026-03-31 16:48:00+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/157583161/

maxspeed=12 hours -> maxstay=12 hours ? :)
ramthelinefeed (2026-03-31 16:55:43+00:00): oops! :) 
Cheers.
NeisBot (2026-03-30 16:36:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13603291040 v4

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Floral shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-04 12:17:17+00:00): Reverted series of changesets adding SEO POI and blatantly promotional description=* and other malformed tags to it

https://osm.org/changeset/185088048
Linus W Frische (2026-04-25 21:26:05+00:00): Det er vel forkert at tilføje name=Genforeningssten ?

Selve stenen har nok ikke et navn; genforeningsstenen er bare typen af mindesmærke.
Niels GM (2026-04-26 05:29:58+00:00): Tak for din bemærkning; kommenterer den senere på Community Forum.
osmviborg (2026-04-26 08:24:19+00:00): Der er over 600 af dem. Burde være description.
jbcharron (2026-03-31 18:38:37+00:00): Merci pour l'ajout des stations, je viens d'ajouter leur ID
NeisBot (2026-03-30 16:48:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13624025400 v5

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Clinical research facility"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisAgent (2026-03-31 05:40:53+00:00): 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again?
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-04 12:16:50+00:00): Reverted series of changesets adding SEO POI and blatantly promotional description=* and other malformed tags to it

https://osm.org/changeset/185088031
simonpct (2026-04-04 07:34:55+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai remarqué vos récentes modifications sur la ligne 11 (notamment les suppressions d'arrêts). Il semble y avoir une erreur : cette ligne est toujours en service et son tracé n'a pas changé. Pourriez-vous vérifier vos sources ou annuler ces modifications pour que la carte reste exacte ? Je reste disponible si vous voulez en discuter.
silversurfer83 (2026-03-30 19:23:25+00:00): Hi :)

landuse=meadow ist eine bewirtschaftete Wiese... Diese haben weder Adresse noch Telefonnummer. Was ist denn mit dem Kindergarten passiert? Wenn das Gebäude noch steht map die Adresse bitte auf das Gebäude und je nach Nutzung des Gebäudes und der Fläche drumherum pass das landuse=* ggf. nochmal an. Danke

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180639032
eggie (2026-03-30 17:52:05+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback  Zeker weten dat smoothness de juiste tag is voor een scherpe bocht? 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
YellowSoul (2026-05-05 13:33:49+00:00): Hi, bei einigen der Wege steht jetzt weiterhin traffic_sign=DE:240. Das würde auf einen gemeinsamen Geh- und Radweg hindeuten. Wenn die Schilder da nicht stehen, müsste das Attribut weg.
SD Mapman (2026-04-08 17:31:11+00:00): So I threw those on because the City pedantically puts up streetblade signs with block numbers and directionals (and I just saw new ones at I-229 Exit 2 yesterday!). There's been some discussion about freeway names (e.g. https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/veterans-of-foreign-wars-of-the-united-states-memorial-highway-aka-i-83/141703). I am in favor of keeping the directional names within city limits as before.
NeisBot (2026-03-30 17:09:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13639106163 v4

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Remote control track"

#MapWithoutSpam
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-04 12:16:23+00:00): Reverted series of changesets adding SEO POI and blatantly promotional description=* and other malformed tags to it

https://osm.org/changeset/185088016
iandees (2026-03-30 17:39:27+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6407281904 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180641045, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
Piskvor (2026-03-31 09:52:35+00:00): Provably exists. Photo as of 2026-03-22: https://www.rajce.idnes.cz/petr-ujezd/album/d0-511-2026-03-22-miuk-dubec/1706453828 

Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180664031 . What is the source of your edits?
eggie (2026-03-30 18:01:27+00:00): Dag Holland  Ik heb wel de tag building=warehouse verwijdert.
Een relatie is niet echt nodig. Je kunt gewoon twee bedrijven hetzelfde adres geven.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-03-30 17:55:53+00:00): Dag wij3 
Je verandert een verkeersbord give way in residential Waarom?

Dat geeft een foutmelding.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-03-30 17:58:21+00:00): Verkeersbord teruggezet.
Kijk hier svp naar de wiki of het wel klopt.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:smoothness
Gr eggie
eggie (2026-03-30 18:06:15+00:00): Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=180639885
t_ja (2026-04-01 19:05:38+00:00): Ahoj,
preco si odmazal z objektu Materska skola (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1472701606) oznacenie building=yes? Osobne som sa este nestretol s tym, ze by MS bola pod holym nebom 😉

Prosim oprav si to po sebe.

T.
Michaello89 (2026-04-01 19:14:07+00:00): zamerne to nebolo, nie som si toho vedomy, urcite opravim, vdaka za napomenutie
NeisBot (2026-03-30 17:18:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13691985480 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Medical spa clinic"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-04-07 22:33:05+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/180640906
NeisBot (2026-03-30 17:24:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13692014482 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Medical spa"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-04-07 22:33:08+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/180640906
Harald Hartmann (2026-03-30 19:01:49+00:00): Servus MKnight,
ich habe auch @Kauna - der die Umbenennung durchgeführt hat - hierher eingeladen.
Du hast ja sein `alt_name` durch `old_name` ersetzt, und dabei auch den Namen von "Brünn" in "Brünnau" geändert.
Was mir noch nicht klar ist: was ist jetzt der offizielle (amtliche) Name (was dann in `name` gehören sollte) und was ist der lokal übliche Name (was dann in `loc_name` gehören sollte). Wenn es denn auch noch einen sehr alten nicht mehr gebräuchlichen Namen gibt, dann könnte der ja in `old_name`.
Ich habe mal einen Kontakt beim Landratsamt Hildburghausen angeschrieben, mal schauen was der so sagt.
Viele Grüße, Harald Hartmann
Kauna (2026-03-30 21:10:35+00:00): https://www.gemeinde-bruenn.de/html/uber_brunn.html

Hallo, habe leider zu später Stunde nicht mehr so viel Zeit. Weiteres eventuell morgen. Hier aber vorab die Seite der Gemeinde. 

Grüße
MKnight (2026-03-30 23:18:39+00:00): Ja moin zusammen,

@Harald: entweder ich überseh was oder Du.

Ich habe gesehen, dass Kauna ein klitzekleines Stück übersehen hat und habe das auch korrigiert.
Zusätzlich hab ich mir das alles mal genauer angesehen - ja auch die Webseite der Gemeinde "Brünn" - und dort steht an keiner Stelle etwas über einen Bach namens Brünn, sondern entweder Brünna oder alt Brünnau.
Das habe ich im CS abgebildet.
Kauna (2026-03-31 04:23:26+00:00): Guten Morgen.
Ja es ist korrekt, der Name "Brünn" für den Fluss war von Anfang an falsch, daher habe ich ihn geändert. Er heißt hier seit jeher "Brünna". Auch fehlte, dass er in Goßmannsrod bei Zusammenfluss mit der Weißa zur Schwaba wurde bis alles in die Werra fließt.

Dass der Fluss früher "Brünnau" hieß kann ich auch nur der Chronik der Gemeinde entnehmen, kann nicht sagen wie lange das schon zurück liegt, aber korrekt ist es.

Vielen Dank für die Hinweise und das wache Auge, bin noch neu und möchte einfach meinen Beitrag hinzugeben.

Schönen Gruß
Harald Hartmann (2026-03-31 08:38:43+00:00): @MKnight ja, das "Brünnau" auf der Gemeindeseite habe ich in der Tat übersehen. 

Aber gut, dann sollte das ja nun alles passen. @Kauna gut, dass es dir aufgefallen ist.

Sollten wir in die Relation auch noch den nördlichen Teil https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/493223399 mit aufnehmen?

@MKnight du bist ja auch schon länger dabei: wie stehst du dazu, dass die jetzige Relation vom Typ `waterway=river` ist, dort aber in der Ortslage Brattendorf die Ways vom Typ `waterway=stream` sind?
MKnight (2026-04-02 13:52:20+00:00): ich würde da konsequuent auf stream gehen, hab ich nich gesehen und grad keine Zeit/Nerv
NeisBot (2026-03-30 17:27:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13692000015 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Medical spa"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-04-07 22:33:10+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/180640906
Pikse (2026-06-07 08:30:05+00:00): It appears island parts that are not part of the national park were added here. These parts though shouldn't be mapped as separate islands that lie next to one another. Either separate way should be created for the whole island, in addition to slightly different way representing the national park boundary, or a relation should be created for the island as well, so that it and the national park can share the outer ways. I'll try to fix the situation in the latter manner.
007Transformer (2026-04-01 04:55:55+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:180700926
NeisBot (2026-03-30 17:39:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13691985480 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Medspa"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-07 22:33:15+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181022840
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
NeisBot (2026-03-30 17:42:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13692008132 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Construction company"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisAgent (2026-03-30 22:33:15+00:00): 🕵 The changeset tags appear to reference Google as a data source.

Please note that using Google Maps, Google Street View, or similar Google services as a mapping source is not allowed in OpenStreetMap due to license restrictions.

More information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google

If the data in this changeset was derived from Google or another incompatible source, the edits may need to be reverted.

If this is a misunderstanding and the data was collected from permitted sources (e.g. local survey, Bing imagery, local knowledge, etc.), please clarify in a reply.
Wildsharky (2026-04-01 12:44:38+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:180657837
kukuk (2026-03-31 20:45:24+00:00): Wie kommst Du auf die Idee, das der Venusweg keine Wohnstraße ist sondern nur ein Fußweg?
Da ich Miteigentümer bin kann ich Dir sagen, dass das nicht korrekt ist.