piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Filip009 (2023-07-07 05:40:48+00:00): Myslím, že tu nebude problém s tagom bicycle=yes ale s tagom highway=path, pre ktorý tam cestné bicykle nepustí navigácia.
aceman444 (2023-07-10 12:49:03+00:00): Filip009:
To by bolo divne, kedze highway=path +bicycle=yes, alebo bicycle=designated a foot=designated sa v niektorych krajinach znaci zdielana cyklocesta.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpath pise, ze path je bezne vhodna aj pre bicykle. Skor by som teda hadal, ze tym navigaciam vadilo surface=unpaved, co moze byt hocico (aj piesok alebo sneh), takze nevhodne pre cestne bicykle.

mizoslav:
Znacka 'bicycle' vobec neznamena 'vhodne pre cestne bicykle', to si s niecim mylite. Tieto znacky znamenaju legalne povolenie vjazdu zo zakona, alebo z dopravnej znacky. Ano, mozme sa bavit ci je to lesna cesta a zaroven znacena cyklotrasa a potom by tam vjazd povoleny mohol byt.
Otazka skor je, preco ten usek navigacie obchadzali pred Vasim zasahom, ked tam bolo highway=path+surface=unpaved . Ci nie je chyba v navigaciach. Alebo mozno spravne radsej na takuto cestu nejdu, kedze nevedia aky je tam povrch (smutne, ze tvrdite, ze je gravel, ale surface=gravel ste nezadali). Taktiez ste mohli dat znacku 'smoothness' aby mohli navigacie usudit, ci je to vhodne pre cestne alebo len horske bicykle.

Inak na mieste som osobne bol, takze nikam ma tahat netreba :) Ale znacka bicycle=yes nehovori nic o pomeroch na mieste (len ak by tam bola dopravna znacka), takze sa o nej mozeme bavit aj tu od PC (na zaklade zakonov pre jazdu v lese ci chranenej oblasti). Zial ziadnu vlastnost cesty zistitelnu len na mieste a upresnujucu kvalitu cesty ste nepridali.
Inak rozne navigacie sa spravaju rovnako, ani dnes tam niektore routovace priamo na OSM.org bicykle nepustia (https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_bike&route=49.32226%2C18.39327%3B49.32440%2C18.38495#map=16/49.3238/18.3870&layers=C), ale napr. Valhalla ano: https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_valhalla_bicycle&route=49.3223%2C18.3933%3B49.3244%2C18.3850#map=16/49.3222/18.3891&layers=C . Cize mozno stale je problem v tom 'surface'.
aceman444 (2023-07-10 12:52:03+00:00): .. rozne navigacie sa spravaju rozne...
A v OSM sa nesmie znacit tak, aby sme uspokojili nejake navigacie (ako ste urobili na chodnikoch v Bratislave), ale aka je skutocnost na mieste a navigacie sa nasledne maju naucit spravne navigovat, ak maju v OSM zadany dostatok informacii o ceste.
mizoslav (2026-02-23 11:34:22+00:00): Týmto chcem poďakovať dobrej duši, že chybu odstránil. Plánovanie cykloturistického výletu cez sedlo Butorky je možné na akomkoľvek bicykli.
Zároveň chcem vyjadriť poľutovanie nad mojou neznalosťou atribútov OSM, ktoré  zapríčinili nie celkom uspokojivý stav OSM na chodníkoch a cestach v Bratislave - Dúbravke. Sľubujem, že sa pokúsim dohnať zameškané a všetky chyby s pomocou administrátora daného regiónu napraviť. 
Ešte raz ďakujem za trpezlivosť a citlivý, ľudský, profesionálny prístup. 
Prajem veľa pracovných a osobných úspechov.
pantufla (2023-10-16 12:56:06+00:00): Esto también lo podemos borrar? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10279076583/history
rirausquin (2023-10-16 13:59:02+00:00): Ya fue borrado
Tatfahren (2022-12-22 16:06:29+00:00): Hallo pantastic
Hat der Weg aus dem anderen Changeset tatsächlich so einen langen Namen? Eine Beschreibung des weges kommt in den description Tag, und das wo der Weg hinführt sowie der Typ des Weges sollte anhand der Tags und Positionierung ersichtlich sein.

Zu der Ferienwohnung: bitte lösche die Beschreibung, diese sollte nicht werbend formuliert werden, siehe dazu auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:description?uselang=de

Der von dir verwendete rooms=* tag ist für die angabe der Anzahl der Räume, die Raumtypen kannst du in die description packen, natürlich nur formell formuliert ; ) 

Gerne kannst du das selber Anpassen, ansonsten mache ich das auch (oder ein anderer der vorbei kommt, du hast ja noch review requested angemacht).

Danke Tatfahren
Andrea Musuruane (2022-12-22 08:51:04+00:00): OSM is not the playground for tests. Please revert this commit ASAP.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130352790
opendcc (2022-12-22 09:49:56+00:00): I reverted this stuff with two different, small changesets (not to span a new changeset across the half world ..)

@Hogroast: please follow the rules when contributing to osm. Thank you.
Hogroast (2022-12-22 10:51:20+00:00): Playground for tests? What does that mean? I used the facility to add meaningful data. Techno-trolling is dispicably demeaning. I shall now sadly remove the excellent Maps app from all my devices. Entirely a consequence of self-opinionated fuckwits.
Hogroast (2022-12-22 18:49:44+00:00): PLEASE REMOVE ALL DATA ENTERED BY ME.
THANKS IN ADVANCE.
map per (2023-01-04 17:36:50+00:00): Everyting you added is reverted. So everything is fine now.

(looks like you / your Maps.me installation kept adding stuff (1) however)

(1) https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/130568840
ivanbranco (2024-08-26 06:12:31+00:00): Hi Russ!

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10279130346/history

is this a milestone? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmilestone

thanks and good mapping
Russ McD (2024-08-27 08:12:15+00:00): Yup - I have changed tag accordingly.
mapimizer (2022-12-23 11:55:38+00:00): What about the stop at Klinikum Nord?
osm-pt-account 😎 (2022-12-27 23:09:52+00:00): Route corrected
emersonveenstra (2023-01-21 20:19:26+00:00): Hi,

Please be more careful when editing. you added bridge=yes to the entire length of Eastern
Fizzie-DWG (2023-03-02 00:28:47+00:00): Reverted by DWG as apparent import from unauthorised source: 
changeset/133192267
Fizzie-DWG (2023-03-02 00:22:56+00:00): Reverted by DWG as apparent import from unauthorised source: changeset/133192171
emersonveenstra (2023-01-21 20:21:10+00:00): Hi,

You left two sections of Lafayette as secondary, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/561047828 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/561047824. please fix them, thanks!
Benoît C MdP (2022-12-22 08:56:45+00:00): Bonjour n8dx,

La piste cyclable était déjà présente sur la voie principale du boulevard Garibaldi. Tu viens donc de créer des doublons que j'ai dédoublonné

Bonne continuation.

Benoît
n8dx (2022-12-22 16:54:42+00:00): Bonjour Benoît,
Effectivement, au temps pour moi, je n'ai pas fait attention à la présence de la piste cyclable sur la voix principale !
J'ai un tracé précis de cette piste cyclable qui se trouve à droite de la route séparée par une marche (obtenu de l'open data de la ville de paris). Cette piste cyclable est aussi cartographiée avec sa propre voix en amont et en aval de la zone que je modifiais.
Ne penses-tu pas qu'il vaudrait mieux supprimer le doublon sur la voix principale et garder la voix séparée ? 
Bien à toi,
n8dx
Benoît C MdP (2022-12-23 07:21:28+00:00): Comme il y a des alternances de bandes et de pistes, j'avais rétabli la situation initiale, car c'est plus simple. Mais tu peux bien sûr recréer une piste séparée là où c'est effectivement une piste :)

Bonne continuation

Benoît
eggie (2022-12-22 07:22:51+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Zandu (2023-11-17 17:06:28+00:00): Adding sidewalk crossing to highway.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130353639
Enock4seth (2022-12-26 10:35:28+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap,

"nice catch" is not a good changeset comment. 

What are you trying to achieve here? Adding street names and buildings? The street name is definitely not "HEMANG".

If you map features without any tag - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_features , they are useless. 

I am reverting your changes here.
mariotomo (2023-01-10 20:35:36+00:00): Hola, como ya sabes de los comentarios que recibiste en https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/rutas-de-metrobus-en-panama/3689/ y por el informe https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/PA/8/PA-8-Panama-Analysis.html, así como está esta ruta tiene tantos errores e inconsistencias que no se entiende qué quisiste describir. Si lo entendí bien, no mapeas basado en observación directa sino copiando de otro mapa. Es correcto?
mariotomo (2023-01-18 13:58:46+00:00): the mapper provided confirmation to mi question (copied from another map), and he knows that the license of his source is incompatible with OSM: »si consideras la ruta que trace como ejemplo, para la discusión, deba eliminarle me avisas, […], sé que no cumple con lo permisos establecidos por OSM, mi fuente, como ya nos dijiste no cumple, solo la edité para demostrar que podemos trabajar con esa información.« https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/rutas-de-metrobus-en-panama/3689/43
user_16318098 (2022-12-22 03:19:41+00:00): こんにちは。

名称を一気に複数の地物へ追加されていると思うのですが、そのほとんどがGoogle Mapsのものと一致しています。

そのため、情報源をお教えいただけないでしょうか。

よろしくお願いします。
mariotomo (2022-12-27 09:11:44+00:00): Hola. No entiendo la descripción del conjunto de cambios. Me ayudas?
mariotomo (2022-12-27 12:42:17+00:00): he visto qué has cambiado, un name:en en loc_name. no me parece corrección sini introducción de error. porqué lo has hecho?
mariotomo (2022-12-31 17:35:08+00:00): in my opinion you are acting on a QA false positive. please try to talk to fellow mappers before doing things you only half understand..
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130355036
mariotomo (2022-12-31 17:39:44+00:00): reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/130729642
mariotomo (2023-01-03 14:29:49+00:00): Hola Alvarado2510. Me gustaría que nos entendamos bien sobre este punto, para evitar en el futuro que uno haga y el otro deshaga así como ahora. Nuestras energías pueden ser utilizadas mejor si estamos de acuerdo.
user4816003805 (2023-01-21 05:41:54+00:00): Hi Citizen Five,

Welcome to OSM!

Unfortunately, this changeset dragged some nodes out of place for the Japantown Peace Plaza and a bus stop, which can be seen here:

https://osmlab.github.io/changeset-map/#130356973

I've fixed the dragged nodes by reverting the changeset in https://osm.org/changeset/131530568 .

Also, the "description" tag should be short and describe the on-the-ground features, not subjective evaluations of historical features:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description

If you're interested, though, historical features can be mapped in https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/ .

Happy mapping!
mavl (2023-04-25 09:11:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
Frans S (2022-12-25 10:38:18+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project and welcome as a new mapper.
Your mappings are rather precise, however a few remarks.
Never connect nodes of a road to other objects, like here, road nodes to hedges.
Where 2 adjacent pieces of land have a common hedge, just map that common hedge once. Don't overlap mappings.
Where a road crosses a hedge, the hedge needs to be interrupted on that place.
Frans S (2022-12-25 11:34:20+00:00): Hi. Back again.
You tagged residential areas wrongly.
These need to be mapped on a single node and tagged.
The way you mapped it is should be tagged as landuse=residential.
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2022-12-25 11:56:26+00:00): Hello again. 
You mapped a place=isolated dwelling as ab object. (5 nodes).
Places need to be mapped on a single node and tagged.
Best regards and keep mapping
Warin61 (2022-12-30 02:13:55+00:00): Hi,
Welcome to OSM!

One of the harder things to do are multipolygon relations. 
The relation 15033861 - parking - is not right .. the outer ways 'share segments'. In this instance I would not have a relation ... I'd simply have a single way around the whole thing... 
For the error see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.03953&lat=-37.90261&zoom=18&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways
Warin61 (2023-01-12 05:47:37+00:00): This error remains. Most people learn well from fixing their own errors. Let me know if you need help. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/130358018
tastrax (2023-02-03 05:56:17+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code 
+61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX
as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features  - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
Warin61 (2023-02-04 08:39:31+00:00): \Hi,

Note these are not personal criticisms but information about OSM tagging and mapping to help improve your mapping.
Rizky IRM-ED (2023-01-31 08:29:34+00:00): Heloo HikeAndMap Great work, a lot of mapping done thank you
If I can see you add some highway tagged as pier in wetland which it's not common(https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1124067736)
How about just changing it to a bridge, if it's made of wood and can't be passed by 4-wheeled vehicles, it's better if the pier is changed to bridge=broadwalk https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bridge%3Dboardwalk
I really appreciate any information you provide.
Thank you, Rizky
HikeAndMap (2023-02-02 02:38:25+00:00): Hi, Didn't even know we had a tag "boardwalk" but the thing is - I still think it's a pier looking at the example pictures. 

This area used to be coastline - and it's still subject to tidal water rise/fall.

It looks also exactly the same as the piers at Kampung Tanjung Aru Lama and Aru Baru - except maybe they are still at the current coastline directly.

The whole Sutera Harbor is NOT the original coastline - it's newly gained land - the original coastline is basically for this"wetland"

I'd say it's more the "wetland" is a misnomer - it's not really wetland but there's low tide always water and high-tide higher water..

And again, saline water..

So maybe wetland is wrong?

or maybe both pier and wetland is wrong - just copied the classification from other mappers who mapped around KK before me.

That's usually my way of working - I look what others did before me - search on the convention page if it says anything otherwise - if not - then I tag things I see just the way as others did before me.

So if  "pier" or "wetland" is right or wrong - I honestly don't know.

it's just - no local Malaysian convention telling me otherwise? 
Then I stick to the key/value combinations others used before me for that area.

Cheers - feel free to tag it otherwise if you feel it should

But keep in mind - the boardwalk example I see are all
-1) low to the ground
-2) areas that are wet - but not 24/7 flooded
-3) non-tidal 
-4) not directly connected to the salt-water

which both applies to this area
Rizky IRM-ED (2023-02-03 07:41:41+00:00): Thank you for providing additional information after I looked around. Bridge=broadwalk is not a common term in Malaysia and another data point is close to this. However, I believe "pier" is not quite right, as "pier" is commonly used for vessel berthing (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dpier line 2). Perhaps bridge=yes is more appropriate because that footway is used for residential areas activities, and I see another location similar to this one on imagery, anyone added information with this tag too
HikeAndMap (2023-02-05 07:36:17+00:00): Well from the link you sent me, pier looks exactly fitting to me.

From the wiki: "A pier is a raised walkway over water supported by pillars made of metal, wood or concrete, or floating and secured using chains"

Looks 100% fitting to me.

Quote from your comment: "commonly used for vessel berthing"

that's not what the wiki says!

Quote from wiki: according to the International Hydrographic Organization, is "a long, narrow structure extending into the water to afford a berthing place for vessels, to serve as a promenade, etc.""

Let's transfer the punctuation of that into a list:
1) vessel berthing
2) promenade
3) etc.

So a pier is not defined as you probably read only the first value of the punctuation: "vessel berthing", but according to the International Hydrographic Organization it's a whole list of purposes that a pier serves.

And in my understanding the "etc." part of the definition by the IHO I don't see it out-ruling the use of piers to access houses.

that's my interpretation.

I clicked on the link provided to the IHO on that wiki entry - but that's a fake link that doesn't exist sadly - or at least not anymore.

Also - keep in mind these piers where originally constructed for fishermen where they had their houses and boats docked. 
 
Only after very rich Chinese investors came and artificially changed the coastline to dominate the local population and deny them fishing rights and destroy the livelihood of the local Malay fishermen - this became a still tidal influenced area that's still connected to the sea by a narrow canal - but not nearly good enough for fishing boats to actively being used anymore and driving out the fishermen - and thus today used primarily for housing.

But the piers are still the same from the times of before the native population was expunged and exiled by the Chinese investors.

And with buildings=value OSM also has the golden rule we map the buildings as their original intentions are. If the use today is different - than we map that use as such. So a building=church is still building=church, even if today being used as a restaurant or disco or event hall.

So here's my 2 thoughts and/or arguments - why I still believe pier is a better way of tagging these - opposed to "boardwalk" or "bridge"
DaveF (2022-12-25 12:40:51+00:00): FYI the railway=station is already mapped. All stations are mapped as nodes.
t_ja (2022-12-22 17:33:35+00:00): Ahoj,
na základe čoho sa rozhoduješ, ktoré tagy pridáš a ktoré nie?

Napríklad v tejto sade zmien si do názvu dal "Rímskokatolícky", ale tagy religion + denomination si už nedal. 

Pritom v predchádzajúcej sade zmien si tieto tagy použil (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/325298333), ale v názve je už len "Farský úrad", t.j. vypadlo slovíčko "Rímskokatolícky".

V ďalšej sade zmien si do názvu dal aj názov obce, napr. "Farský úrad Turzovka" (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/225152277), pritom táto informácia je už obsiahnutá v "addr:city" a predchádzajúce dve sady zmien názov obce neobsahujú. A aby toho nebolo málo, tak v ďalšej sade zmien si názov obce aj vyskloňoval, napr. "... V Štiavniku" (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/224926631).

Bolo by možné používať jednotné tagovanie, aby to nevyzeralo, že to robili minimálne 4 rozličné osoby (pod jedným OSM účtom)?

Vopred vďaka za odpoveď.
mapperue (2022-12-22 18:38:16+00:00): Ahoj, pri týchto zmenách som len spojil "node" s "building", pretože je to jeden objekt. Názvy som neriešil, pretože, farnosti sa označujú rôzne, napr. "Rímskokatolícky farský úrad", "Farský úrad", "Rímskokatolícka cirkev, farnosť XY".
highflyer74 (2022-12-22 07:33:04+00:00): Moin und willkommen bei OSM!

Sei so nett, nur einen Namen zu vergeben, wenn etwas auch einen Namen hat. "Trinkwasser" ist kein Name.

Versuche bitte auch, deine Änderungen auf einen kleineren Bereich zu beschränken. Dieser Änderungssatz reicht über halb Europa.

Wenn du noch Fragen hast, melde dich gern!
Syl (2023-01-01 16:09:36+00:00): Bonjour, c'est vraiment le nom de la route ou il s'agit d'un lieu dit ?
Yaaaaaaaa (2023-01-04 12:59:53+00:00): bonjour Syl, c'est une route sans FANTOIR, provenant de https://bano.openstreetmap.fr/pifometre/top_adresses_manquantes.html
Enock4seth (2023-06-09 19:18:29+00:00): Use the name field for name of features not descriptions
silversurfer83 (2022-12-22 21:28:15+00:00): seriously, dude?
hofoen (2022-12-23 09:35:23+00:00): Geht es um die große Bounding-Box? Das war leider ein Versehen - das sollten 2 CS werden. Eine große Bounding-Box ist leider genauso wenig hilfreich, wie Dein nichts sagender Kommentar... :(
silversurfer83 (2022-12-23 10:13:04+00:00): Hi
Ja. 
Sorry. War spät gestern. Tut mir leid. Normalerweise versuche ich sachlich und freundlich zu bleiben
hofoen (2022-12-23 14:24:10+00:00): Kein Problem.
user2137papież (2022-12-22 07:44:48+00:00): Po otwarciu zachodniej obwodnicy głogowa będzie można przywrócić secondary ponieważ wtedy "kółka" nie będzie. - OSM ucina więc piszę tu
Yunkers (2022-12-22 08:37:05+00:00): Już kiedyś przeprowadziłeś tę zmianę i była wycofana, skąd pomysł, że jak przeprowadzisz ją znowu to przejdzie?
user2137papież (2022-12-22 09:17:02+00:00): inna argumentacja i wtedy degradowałem DK12 obok.
puchaczowsky (2022-12-22 10:24:14+00:00): argumentacja jest podobna, a dwie drogi primary nie powinny być rownolegle obok siebie
user2137papież (2022-12-22 12:02:40+00:00): tyle że problem w tym że tutaj ruch się rozdziela, po co ci którzy jadą na Południe mają robić kółko.
vaisomphuchoa (2022-12-22 07:51:43+00:00): Đường tới Vải SỚm Phúc Hòa
aTarom (2022-12-22 14:20:54+00:00): Hola DeustoTech OSM,
Qué significa
"wild"="yes"
en
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10279625001/history
se siguen subiendo tags de tipo
"weelchair" debe ser "wheelchair"

Saludos
Saikat Maiti (2022-12-22 10:28:15+00:00): Hi Pooja,
Please check the reality, where did you find the tunnel here (way 1124087855)?
Please refer OSM tagging guideline (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway=tram_level_crossing).

- Saikat
Devdatta (2022-12-23 17:34:40+00:00): @Saikat, yes you are correct. I have reversed the incorrect tunnel: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/130430861
eggie (2022-12-22 09:10:39+00:00): Dag Moi.. 
Tip...  Namen van bedrijven zie je alleen maar op de kaart als je de aard van het bedrijf toevoegt.. shop=...
office=company of yes (of iets beter) 
craft rendert helaas nog niet.
- Bij playground hoort de tag leisure=playground. 
-access=destination is algemeen.
Wellicht motor_vehicle=destination?

Lastig die accesstags..

En het belangrijkste... Niet schuiven met de kaart in editmodus. Levert vaak schade op.(verschuivingen) . Hier niet overigens nu.
Dus beter in meer uploads aanpassen. 

Mapse
eggie
eggie (2022-12-22 09:11:13+00:00): Je edits... Dan is het makkelijker terugvinden https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=130363872
Moi70 (2022-12-22 09:17:12+00:00): Daar dacht ik idd later aan, dat ik iets eerder op upload had moeten drukken. Doe ik de volgende keer. 
Bedrijven zal ik aanpassen 
 en uitgebreidere doen en de accestags kijk ik ook naar. Bedankt voor je tips. 
Bedankt
NorthCrab (2022-12-22 19:29:21+00:00): Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zmiana jest w porządku! Życzę miłych i spokojnych świąt oraz szczęśliwego nowego roku. Pozdrawiam serdecznie!
Saikat Maiti (2022-12-22 09:26:37+00:00): Hi Pooja,
Thank you for mapping in Kolkata. Please check the dual carriageway you have created, it is not a two-way road, and correct the junction configuration near node/302477389.

This highway (way/102784452) - is not merging at node/664472032, there is a physical barrier.
Happy Mapping!

- Saikat
Pooja Koul (2022-12-26 03:55:46+00:00): Hi Saikat,
I have made the possible changes.....Thanks
Saikat Maiti (2022-12-26 12:36:57+00:00): Thanks for making these updates. Please learn more about the intersection modeling here.
https://labs.mapbox.com/mapping/mapping-for-navigation/modeling-intersections-for-map-navigation/

I hope this will help.