piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse (2024-01-12 12:53:53+00:00): Where there's a choice of words for something, and one is capable of being misinterpreted due to multiple meanings, OSM tends to pick the other - hence "sidewalk" is used rather than "pavement", despite the latter being the regular British English term (for historical reasons British English has tended to be used in OSM).
"pound" isn't a good choice for these features; there are too many other different things using the same word.  Compare https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=pound#values and https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=pinfold#values .
b-unicycling (2024-01-12 14:14:44+00:00): All your taginfo links prove is that "pound" is a word much more often used than "pinfold". You would have to check what the "pound" in all the placenames refers to. "town pound" is also used in the United States, I have come across no instance of "town pinfold" yet, so it is a word used not just in the South of England. I'm not trying to get rid of regional words, but we need a standard that is understood intuitively by people.
SomeoneElse (2024-01-12 14:58:28+00:00): For info this now appears at https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#19/54.29935/-0.89010 .
b-unicycling (2024-01-12 15:36:31+00:00): Nice work. I'm done now browsing through Wikimedia.
Taksine (2024-01-12 07:57:23+00:00): 您好，Y816是道路编号，应当写在道路编号上面，而不是名称那里。
Emdier (2024-01-14 02:37:56+00:00): Corrected.
Jrachi (2024-01-12 07:56:13+00:00): Ciao.
Grazie di avere rimesso la way sul 421.
Ma non capisco perché hai messo layer=1 sull'edificio.
Conosco benissimo quel posto, nel senso che ci andavamo spesso da bambini, e ci sono tornato anche di recente.
Quello è un tipico building_passage.
Visto che hai tempo di aggiungere nomi inutili, ridondanti e fuorvianti, dovresti trovare il tempo di leggere la wiki.
Priacco è diventato village?
Ci sono nato, mio padre vi nacque quando era comune, e non ha più servizi, i negozi di alimentari erano due, tanti, tanti anni fa.
Anche aggiungere statistiche di 20 anni fa mi sembra inutile e potenzialmente fonte di errori.

Cordialmente, Ivo
Fedurli (2024-01-13 02:14:50+00:00): Non è mai stata tolta alcuna relazione dal segmento. Le correzioni le fa la mappa in automatico al momento del salvataggio, che ti chiede "mappa sopra"/"mappa sotto".
Non so di che statistiche parli perché io non le ho toccate, ma alcune fonti (tipo ASL) includono anche la zona Pedaggio in Priacco, che porta la località a superare i 1000 abitanti. Oltre ciò, dei quali non ci sono dati certi e aggiornati, a Priacco sono presenti tutt'oggi la scuola elementare e il cimitero, che rendono il luogo ben diverso da un "hamlet"... soprattutto se con hamlet si indicano complessi da 20 abitanti.
Fedurli (2024-01-13 02:18:17+00:00): Forse è più utile aggiungere "nomi fuorvianti, ridondanti e inutili" creando una mappa leggibile che creare relazioni di percorsi escursionistici sconosciuti, non segnalati e non comunque visibili all'utenza di OSM
Jrachi (2024-01-13 09:25:51+00:00): Scusa, ma cosa vuol dire "mappa sopra/mappa sotto"?
ID ti segnala gli errori che stai caricando e suggerisce le soluzioni in automatico.
Ma si deve fare attenzione perché ti fa fare delle grandi cavolate!
Non voglio farti una lezione sui layer e sul significato di livello terreno, o come mappare dove una strada passa sotto ad una casa, piuttosto che la strada che passa sotto il piano stradale.
Sei un ragazzo intelligente e puoi andare a leggere la wiki.
La ASL fornisce dati sulla popolazione? O intendevi l'ISTAT?
Riguardo all'hamlet,, hanno riaperto la scuola elementare a Priacco? Non lo sapevo, conosco solo più gente anziana senza bambini...
E perchè dici 20 abitanti?
La taggatura dei place segue una regola flessibile che "dovrebbe" bilanciare tra numero di abitanti e "importanza".
La presenza di servizi è importante per definire l'importanza del luogo nella zona in cui è.
Il Pedaggio era parte del comune di Priacco fino al 1936. Ora non so neanche se ha una qualche qualità amministrativa.
A proposito di Pedaggio, perché non c'è sulla mappa?
Le statistiche di cui parlo sono che risulta che tu hai aggiunto i tag:
population:date=2001-10-21
population=143
wikidata=Q3911361
wikipedia=it:Priacco
name=Priacco
e cambiato da hamlet a:
place=village
Il 18/7/2023 ore 1:53 con il changeset 138642438

Forse lo avevo già detto, ma perché invece di fare l'osmer problematico, non ti unisci a qualche gruppo locale della coommunity?

Ivo
Jrachi (2024-01-13 09:26:20+00:00): Scusa, ma cosa vuol dire "mappa sopra/mappa sotto"?
ID ti segnala gli errori che stai caricando e suggerisce le soluzioni in automatico.
Ma si deve fare attenzione perché ti fa fare delle grandi cavolate!
Non voglio farti una lezione sui layer e sul significato di livello terreno, o come mappare dove una strada passa sotto ad una casa, piuttosto che la strada che passa sotto il piano stradale.
Sei un ragazzo intelligente e puoi andare a leggere la wiki.
La ASL fornisce dati sulla popolazione? O intendevi l'ISTAT?
Riguardo all'hamlet,, hanno riaperto la scuola elementare a Priacco? Non lo sapevo, conosco solo più gente anziana senza bambini...
E perchè dici 20 abitanti?
La taggatura dei place segue una regola flessibile che "dovrebbe" bilanciare tra numero di abitanti e "importanza".
La presenza di servizi è importante per definire l'importanza del luogo nella zona in cui è.
Il Pedaggio era parte del comune di Priacco fino al 1936. Ora non so neanche se ha una qualche qualità amministrativa.
A proposito di Pedaggio, perché non c'è sulla mappa?
Le statistiche di cui parlo sono che risulta che tu hai aggiunto i tag:
population:date=2001-10-21
population=143
wikidata=Q3911361
wikipedia=it:Priacco
name=Priacco
e cambiato da hamlet a:
place=village
Il 18/7/2023 ore 1:53 con il changeset 138642438

Forse lo avevo già detto, ma perché invece di fare l'osmer problematico, non ti unisci a qualche gruppo locale della coommunity?

Ivo
Jrachi (2024-01-13 09:28:34+00:00): Dimenticavo...
layer=1 sull'edificio significa che l'intero edificio si trova sospeso sopra il livello del terreno.
Prima era la strada che su si trovava sotto il livello del terreno, avrebbe anche richiesto di specificare se era un tunnel...
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-01-12 11:02:27+00:00): Reviewed
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146162607
NeisBot (2024-01-15 06:43:12+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146176612
SomeoneElse (2024-01-12 14:56:53+00:00): Just wondered - was leisure=park a typo on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1238988328 or is it really a park?
b-unicycling (2024-01-12 15:35:03+00:00): It has a picnic table in it on wikimedia and seems to be considered a "pocket park", so no typo.
SomeoneElse (2024-01-12 15:43:13+00:00): ah - ok.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-12 01:40:28+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/899181873

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Marek-M (2024-01-12 06:57:08+00:00): Gospodarstwo Szkółkarskie | Nadleśnictwo Miastko: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/376866216 - nie jest poprawnie oznaczone. Nazwa to może być "Gospodarstwo Szkółkarskie" ale "Nadleśnictwo Miastko" powinno trafić do klucza operator.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:landuse=plant%20nursery
NeisBot (2024-01-13 00:23:19+00:00): Hello RespToo, thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.

Thanks!

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
ChillyDL (2024-01-13 11:35:13+00:00): Hallo Yorvik Prestigitator,
heißt das Bücherhäuschen allen Ernstes on the ground "Bücherhüsli"? Das wäre ein merkwürdiger Sprachmischmasch; allemannisch wäre Diphtong statt Umlaut: "Biecherhüsli". Oder Schriftdeutsch "Bücherhäuslein".
Allison P (2024-01-12 04:43:01+00:00): At this point I'm blaming iD for introducing these duplicated nodes
b-jazz (2024-01-16 22:20:39+00:00): I definitely blame the tools, but I think it is far more than just iD. I wonder if there is some shared component that introduces the bug across several editors. I should do some analysis.
emersonveenstra (2024-01-13 13:07:53+00:00): Hi there,

On https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1238996468#map=19/42.72922/-84.46152 you added "turn:lanes", but it's not a oneway road and the lanes are out of order. Could you go back and double check that those tags are entered correctly please? Thanks!
baumann3141 (2024-01-13 16:37:45+00:00): Hi emersonveenstra, thank you for your comments. I was completely sure about the turn lanes, I will check and correct. The "turn:lanes" doesn't require one-way I think, but I will check. They might appear out of order since the direction of the road segment is away from the intersection. But I will check!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146163792
baumann3141 (2024-01-13 17:06:24+00:00): Ok, I found I was missing a "backward" tag since the segment points away from the intersection. I corrected this and it appears correct in the JOSM "Lane and road attributes" display now. Let me know if you find a problem! Thanks!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146163792
emersonveenstra (2024-01-14 13:58:28+00:00): Looks good, thanks!
NeisBot (2024-01-13 00:23:20+00:00): Hello ParadoX_ZLWC, thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.

Thanks!

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
mvexel (2024-01-17 03:36:19+00:00): Hello, 

I deleted your contribution as it does not add anything useful to the map. If you are new to OSM, please take some time to learn the basics of mapping by going to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide

Thank you.
Joske1020 (2026-03-15 15:20:22+00:00): gebruik in het vervolg waterway=ditch ipv waterway=stream
beek ≠ waterway=ditch
emersonveenstra (2024-01-14 13:51:43+00:00): Hi there,

I see you're creating a new tag value "american-chinese" for cuisine. Since you are the only one using it, you should document it on the wiki, and it should be "american_chinese" to conform to the conventions for tag values (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Any_tags_you_like#Syntactic_conventions_for_new_values)
emersonveenstra (2024-02-01 14:26:02+00:00): Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146948216
Chris Fleming (2024-01-12 10:32:20+00:00): Hi Jamie. welcome to OpenStreetMap, thanks for adding these buildings.

I think your main question is around the postcode on the road, we don't usually expect to see postcodes on roads. Better is to add it to the building that you know have that postcode.

My other tip is to square the building, you can do this by right clicking on the building outline and choosing the square option. Or when you have selected the outline of the building press Q
Chris Fleming (2024-01-12 11:17:52+00:00): Looks good - if there is a gate, this can be added as a point (node) in the correct position.
Chris Fleming (2024-01-12 10:37:42+00:00): Thanks; these things are quite tricky I would probably go with shop=plant_hire ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dplant_hire ) But we also could be shop=tool_hire
Chris Fleming (2024-01-12 10:39:17+00:00): Perfect. 

If you can add websites and addresses, that is also useful.
blef (2024-01-12 10:11:29+00:00): Hi,
I've reverted a part of this CS about the caravan site of Saint-Paul-lès-Dax (way 1239005662). This site has been closed for more than one year. I wonder what are your sources for your contributions, you mention "site website". Which site is it?
Chris Fleming (2024-01-12 10:40:27+00:00): That's great, if you don't 100% know the name it is better to leave empty and add in later.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-12 04:10:43+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11510069769
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11510069842

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Chris Fleming (2024-01-12 11:21:54+00:00): Sounds good! FYI I removed the photo link to google. We can't use these as sources, but from the sound of things this is your business so all "local knowledge"
DP24PH (2024-01-17 10:45:40+00:00): You might need to check the applicability of the concerned street with respect to the local conditions. Some streets may prohibit the movement due to the already-installed highway median.


DP24
MoldoveanuPeak (2024-01-18 15:19:51+00:00): Hello DP24, thanks for your comment! Maxar SecureWatch imagery shows a clear break in the barrier, where vehicles may cross the median at www.openstreetmap.org/way/1052958418. If you happen to know more about this intersection in particular, I’d be happy to hear your thoughts on how we could further improve the modeling in OSM. Thanks, and happy mapping!
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-12 04:20:42+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11510085517

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
user_11265617 (2024-01-12 05:10:57+00:00): Replaced with https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11510184188
Reinhard12 (2024-01-13 21:50:02+00:00): Hi Ramsiva,
welcome to OSM. You changed a sidewalk to a motorway.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/878085747
Are you sure?
Greetings
Reinhard
Supaplex030 (2024-01-12 07:12:24+00:00): Congratulations on your 1000th Changeset ☺️ Great work you've done in your city!

(I came here via your thread in the forum)

Best
Alex
ContraBand (2024-01-14 06:36:20+00:00): Many Thanks, Alex.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-12 05:10:43+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11510187588

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-12 05:50:47+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11510207737
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11510229984

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
map per (2024-04-04 18:12:46+00:00): Hello Bobby Lin,

you added a footway on top of a hiking trail. I therefore removed the duplicate footway.

Best regards
map per
nyanpsyche (2024-01-23 18:02:47+00:00): The median along Cambie is not a traffic island. Medians are bigger and longer, and are used to seperate opposing directions of traffic. Traffic islands are intended for traffic calming and are very localized. It would be best to remove this tag from the median.
ngry_pazuzu (2024-01-24 04:01:57+00:00): Okay.
mavl (2024-01-17 18:49:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 146369748 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
Elizen (2024-02-01 09:13:09+00:00): Здравствуйте. Пишу вам по поводу объекта: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1239027565
Можете рассказать откуда вы взяли информацию о данном населённом пункте?
Elizen (2024-02-19 07:41:05+00:00): Здравствуйте. Будьте добры ответить на мой предыдущий комментарий
Ewen Hill (2024-01-13 23:16:28+00:00): Hi Spellsaidwrong, Thanks for mapping this as public transport routes are really important to a lot of downstream users. With your edit, you appear to have added a new standalone relation not connected to the road network where it is best practice to add the relation to the actual road elements. I can revert the change set but it might be easier for you to add the relation to the roads and then remove your original line. 

The other thing with importing data is that it needs to have the correct copyright AND have a waiver. Please check to see if this PTV dataset is available to import please. Keep up the excellent work
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146167821
Warin61 (2024-02-29 23:13:51+00:00): Unfortunately, with no answer as to the question of copyright clearance and mistakes in other changesets, I am inclined to revert this and other changesets using this source. 

Can we have some response???
Warin61 (2024-03-11 04:52:18+00:00): Looks like a 'no'. 

I have deleted the added ways that have no tags - and added the existing ways that are tagged as road in there place. I have deleted the duplicated bus stops .. and retagged 'stop_position' as 'platform'. I have placed the bus stops at the front of the relation and the ways at the rear - all in sequence. I have corrected the roles in the relation. Over 100 objects deleted.

This might fix it. Might.
NiedernhausenerJunge (2024-02-20 10:03:15+00:00): Also am Ehemaligen HBF am Ettlinger Tor sollten die Gleise von der Lokalbahn und der Staatsbahn definitiv nicht miteinander verbunden werden. Das eine war eine Meterspurbahn und die andere Normalspur, also waren sie auch nie verbunden. Die Strecke durch die Mathystraße war halt erst Normalspur, dann Meter und jetzt wieder Normal.

Außerdem finde ich es auch unnötig, razed Gleise dort einzutragen, wo heute immer noch Gleise liegen, wenn auch in einer anderen Spurweite.
Scout Jens (2024-02-20 20:08:54+00:00): Es gab zum Teil Dreischienengleise. Außerdem liegen die neuen Gleise nicht unbedingt am Ort der alten. Ich habe mich mit dem Thema beschäftigt. Schreib bitte, was genau Du ändern möchtest.
Scout Jens (2024-02-20 20:10:25+00:00): Ach ja, schreib bitte auch warum. Ich finde auch viele Eintragungen unnötig. Aber darum geht es nicht.
Mannivu (2024-03-15 16:38:51+00:00): Ciao. Le attività che chiudono andrebbero indicate come disused:amenity così da mantenere lo storico dei nodi.
eggie (2024-01-12 09:57:49+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Warin61 (2024-02-29 23:11:13+00:00): The question as to the copyright status of the source of this and other changesets has not been answered - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146167821
The answer should be provided with some haste. 

This route is not compliant with PTv2 requirements. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Warin61/diary/45106
eggie (2024-01-12 10:02:55+00:00): Dag JD
Weet je zeker dat er een openbaar toegankelijke laadpaal aanwezig is in het gebouw zelf?
MVG
eggie
JDGH (2024-01-12 11:30:53+00:00): Scherp van je. Nee het is ernaast op de parkeerplaats idd, ik probeer t aan te passen.
eggie (2024-01-12 11:33:42+00:00): Top...gebruik anders gewoon de webeditor iD. Dan kun je iets verschuiven.
Groet..
eggie
JDGH (2024-01-12 11:44:02+00:00): Heb je een linkje voor me? Ik kan het zo snel nuet meer vinden anders duik ik in mn browsergeschiedenis
eggie (2024-01-12 11:47:03+00:00): Wanneer je deze changeset opent op de computer .. bewerken.. dan zit je in de online editor. Probeer maar.
eggie (2024-01-12 11:48:00+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146168375
JDGH (2024-01-12 11:56:34+00:00): gelukt. Ik keek eerst op mobiel idd. Thnx
eggie (2024-01-12 12:00:16+00:00): Nog wel even uploaden denk ik.
TrickyFoxy (2024-03-28 21:48:39+00:00): Тут произошло что-то странное: появилось два пустых отношения. 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17016055
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17016057

Похоже это были какие-то запреты, но непонятно какие
Glassman (2024-01-13 17:05:21+00:00): Thanks for removing the descriptive names.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146168545
Strubbl (2024-01-12 18:42:58+00:00): Hi sknitti,

leider werden die Fotos von StreetComplete ca. 7 Tage nachdem ein Hinweis geschlossen wurde, gelöscht. Daher macht es keinen Sinn sie im image-Tag zu hinterlegen.

Viele Grüße
Sven
Strubbl (2024-01-12 22:48:22+00:00): Es gibt wohl einen Botaccount, der die Bilder bereits entfernt hat: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146196392
user_17222985 (2024-01-12 07:01:39+00:00): moved tags to a house in 2 properties
Langlaeufer (2024-01-12 08:00:37+00:00): Hi, ich habe bicycle=designated ergänzt. die werden sonst mit vehicle=destination ebenfalls ausgesperrt.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146168978
doppel-b (2024-01-12 08:13:05+00:00): Hallo, danke für deine Korrektur!
Noch besser wäre wahrscheinlich motor_vehicle=destination, dann wird bicycle=designated nicht benötigt?
Langlaeufer (2024-01-12 08:26:10+00:00): Wäre aber nicht ganz richtig. weil Anlieger frei für anderen Fahrzeuge gilt und nicht nur für Autos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146168978
Langlaeufer (2024-01-12 08:28:27+00:00): siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bicycle_road%3Dyes
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146168978
Langlaeufer (2024-01-12 08:29:24+00:00): noch besser hier: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:bicycle_road%3Dyes
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146168978
doppel-b (2024-01-12 08:43:15+00:00): Danke für die Infos, motor_vehicle meint aber nicht nur Autos, sondern alle Kraftfahrzeuge: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:motor_vehicle
Kommt aber dann auf das Schild an ("Anlieger frei" oder "Autos/Motorrad frei"), wie es in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:bicycle_road%3Dyes dokumentiert ist.
Langlaeufer (2024-01-12 09:56:43+00:00): Richtig, es gibt aber gelegentlich noch Pferdefuhrwerke.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146168978
miasteckieprojekty (2024-01-13 04:48:33+00:00): Mam pytanie do tej zmiany, skoro zmieniłeś zaznaczenie pasa do skrętu w prawo przesuwając węzeł bliżej samego zjazdu, to czy w obecnym kształcie nie wprowadza w błąd? Przestrzeń do zjechania na pas do skrętu w prawo z głównej drogi jest zaznaczona linią przerywaną, następnie zmienia się w ciągłą. W tym miejscu, gdzie jest linia ciągła nie można już zjechać na pas, a po twojej zmianie węzeł jest w takim miejscu, że droga przecina linię ciągłą. Czy w tym miejscu nie powinno być tak, że alejka parkingowa powinna odchodzić od drogi w miejscu, w którym będzie się przecinać z linią przerywaną? Rozumiem istotę zaznaczenia 3 pasów w atrybucie samej głównej jezdni (dwa w tył i jeden po przodu), ale czy jeżeli pojawia się linia ciągła i ona uniemożliwia prawnie manewr, to czy zaznaczenie w takim wypadku nie powinno być w obszarze, w którym prawo na to pozwala. Czyli tag "lanes:backward = 2" jeżeli jest zaznaczony w ciągu drogi gdy nie możemy zjechać na ten drugi pas jest poprawny? Jeżeli dobrze rozumiem to prawnie to jest osobny wydzielony pas, ale nie jest wydzielony fizycznie, a z wcześniejszych twoich wskazówek dotyczących wysepek drogowych to podział jest tylko wtedy gdy jest fizyczne rozdzielenie?
Pozdrawiam