piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2026-07-18 08:45:43+00:00): Hi, 

Als iets heel lang gaat duren.. Dus vele maanden en alles gaat overhoop dan gebruiken we wel construction.
Wanneer je precies de einddatum weet is het gebruikelijk om met conditionaltagging aan te geven hoelang de afsluiting duurt.
De routers die daar mee kunnen omgaan sluiten dan de weg af en na einddatum gaat deze automatisch weer open en kan ook niet vergeten worden.
Voorbeeld.. 
access:conditional=no @ (2025 Sep 20-2026 Apr 03)

MVG
eggie
grzegorz75jan (2026-07-17 19:25:48+00:00): Konstrukcyjnie może jest to wiata ale jak jest podstawa, źródło nazwy którą nadałeś obiektowi. Jeżeli nie jest to nazwa oficjalna to użycie name jest błędne i stanowi tzw. nazwę opisową.

Widzę, że poprzednicy też stosowali radosną twórczość.
Joel Koen (2026-07-18 06:42:00+00:00): Reverted in changeset/185941579: you've accidentally moved a road and duplicated the school that was already mapped
silversurfer83 (2026-07-17 18:39:22+00:00): Moin :)

bei solchen Sperrungen bitte immer a) eine hilfreiche Quelle (voller Link statt "Hessen Mobil" angeben und b) eine note=* am OSM-Objekt hinterlassen welche erklärt, warum da ein access=no dran ist.

Dazu kommt: Je nach Dauer der Sperrung ist es angebrachter ein access:conditional=* zu setzen. 

Bei Fragen immer raus damit
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185914769
silversurfer83 (2026-07-26 18:45:47+00:00): Also wenn das hier

https://mobil.hessen.de/presse/k-12-und-ehemalige-l-3290-fahrbahninstandsetzungen-bei-stadtallendorf

die Meldung ist, dann ist deine Änderung nicht nachvollziehbar.

Habe deine Änderung in
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186417237
zurückgesetzt.
Mateicoti (2026-07-24 19:42:11+00:00): Imi pare rau dar ai gresit cladirea
one_electro_dan (2026-07-24 22:04:27+00:00): Poți oferii mai multe detalii?

Am văzut că notița era într-un loc diferit, mai aproape de casa de la Mihail Kogălniceanu 10A. Casa aia pare totuși una rezidențială, nu o grădiniță. Din imaginile și informațiile pe care le-am găsit pe net, Grădinița cu Program Prelungit Nr. 18 este în locul adăugat de mine.

Oricum, grădinița a fost încadrată în risc seismic 1 și va fi demolată pentru a fi reconstruită una nouă în același loc.
https://www.desteptarea.ro/gradinita-nr-18-din-bacau-va-fi-demolata-din-cauza-riscului-seismic-autoritatile-aproba-construirea-unei-cladiri-noi/

Pe perioada lucrărilor, activitatea a fost mutată temporar în trei locații: Grădinița cu Program Prelungit nr. 29, Grădinița cu Program Prelungit nr. 17 și Colegiul Tehnologic „Anghel Saligny”.
https://scoalacuzabacau.ro/2026/07/02/informare-privind-relocarea-temporara-a-activitatii-g-p-p-nr-18/
Mateicoti (2026-07-24 22:11:34+00:00): Ai dreptate, imi pare rau. Credeam ca e cealalta cladire pentru ca nu ma asteptam ca o gardinita sa aiba acea extindere din spate. Poti inchide noteul. Good job!
Loopslol7 (2026-07-17 17:14:27+00:00): hello! thank you for editing openstreetmap!

By the way, when mapping sports pitches, only the area where the sport is actually played (within the marked boundaries) should be tagged as a sports pitch. The area around it can be tagged with landuse=recreation_ground. I did this for these tennis courts, so you can see an example of how to do it :).

happy mapping, Loopslol7
Loopslol7 (2026-07-17 17:59:56+00:00): turns out i was wrong, based on a conversation i had with more experienced mappers. the out of bounds is still part of the pitch, and recreation ground is not correct, sports centre is, which i noticed you had already tagged, so thank you for that!

i went back and fixed what i did, based on the conversation.
tramen (2026-07-17 18:14:38+00:00): No worries, thanks for fixing it.
By the way if you look at the wiki your first way to map wasn't wrong per se, there just isn't real consensus in the community as to how to map these.

Another thing: From what your profile looks like you seem to mainly map in the US. I would advise to watch out for local mapping customs: Sometimes people get really angry with you if you map something in a style not usually found in the region.

Please don't take this as criticism, it's just a warning for the future because sometimes mapping styles really differ across the pond. 

This also is an alt account for privacy reasons as to not seem like I'm berating you for no reason xD
Loopslol7 (2026-07-18 19:40:52+00:00): yeah, it doesnt seem like there is a real consensus. Based on my discussions, the US community uses recreation area, but the rest of the world uses sports center and finds the recreational area to be ludicrous. So yeah. 

Yeah, I will try to look out for local mapping conventions, or try to stick to the US. 

Youre all good, i dont take this as beratement!

Happy mapping!
GA_Kevin (2026-07-17 16:54:19+00:00): Source is Bing Aerial Imagery, not survey. My apologies, my JOSM had that saved from previous edits.
IndiaKW2Gf7rTBt5C (2026-07-17 17:30:33+00:00): To comtribute OSM, On the ground is the key principle, you need to map the building outlines according on the reality, which may expressed as reliable imagery such as Bing or Esri, your mapping of outlines, positions and angles of buildings need to match the imagery showed, if you not know, see how other mapper to maps the building.

Do not just mass copying and pasting same or similar buildings geometry which disregard what actual building geometry is.

Thank you for your cooperations.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185918143
bxl-forever (2026-07-17 18:20:09+00:00): Hello,

Why is the switch node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14022705408 not connected to the crossover track https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1540078380 here?
pfhllnts (2026-07-17 18:24:21+00:00): Because it's still hard to hit the right positions on a mobile device. I will review all my Brussels changes and address the FIXMEs later when back at the laptop.
TrickyFoxy (2026-07-19 13:33:33+00:00): 👋 Зачем же расширять здание? По его крыше понятна его ширина
grzegorz75jan (2026-07-17 19:54:57+00:00): To użyj podkładu punktów adresowych oraz np. jakiś lokalny SIP. Wprawdzie też mogą być błędne ale zawsze to jakaś pomoc, wskazówka.

Z tego co widzę to z 583B możesz mieć rację a 583C jest raczej nie używanym numerem. Tam w głębi to bardziej gołe 583 (bez litery w numerze).
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-18 08:29:32+00:00): Nice try. Next time you try to re-add this junk, I'll have to simply revert adding the whole POI. Consider yourself warned.

Reverted re-adding blatantly promotional description=* and other malformed tags to it, in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/185945221
4004 (2026-07-26 22:56:43+00:00): не стоит удалять, лучше перетегировать на время ремонта
felipeeugenio (2026-07-18 00:13:15+00:00): Hola. Eso es el mapa mismo, no es un ambiente de pruebas. Lo que hizo fue básicamente vandalismo. La edición fue revertida.
Saludos
eggie (2026-07-17 19:11:43+00:00): Dag glas_brand   Organic is niet altijd ideaal om adressen te bewerken.
Incompleet vaak.
Ik heb je info samengevoegd met de adresnode.
MVG'eggie
glas_brand___gras (2026-07-17 19:32:48+00:00): hey bedankt voor de uitleg en het updaten. wat zou jij aanraden voor het aanpassen van dingen op de kaart?
eggie (2026-07-17 19:41:00+00:00): De normale webeditor iD op een PC.
Ervaren mappers gebruiken bijna allemaal editor JOSM.
De meeste apps voor een mobiel hebben hun beperkingen.
Je kunt die app's natuurlijk onderweg wel gebruiken en dan thuis op de pc checken en evt aanpassen.
Mapse,
eggie
qstep (2026-07-17 18:33:55+00:00): Én a demolished:* előtagot használtam volna, ha esetleg mégis visszaraknák a jövőben mondjuk bronzból.
bxl-forever (2026-07-17 18:15:09+00:00): Hello,

I wish there was a nicer way to welcome you to OSM but this message is to request that you stop messing with the address system in OSM.

Addresses are already managed, and should not be repeated like here. Duplicate data is not welcome in a well-ordered database.

Thanks.
eggie (2026-07-18 08:42:20+00:00): Hoi,

Niet door die fontein heen, want dan krijg je natte voeten of erger.
Ik heb de route een beetje verlegd links en rechts van de fontein.

Groet,
eggie
molensteen (2026-07-18 09:06:09+00:00): Oja, dat kan natuurlijk ook! Goede oplossing, dankjewel eggie
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-18 08:17:44+00:00): SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. See https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more information.

Reverted adding SEO spam POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags, likely sourced from Google Maps, in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/185944785
GA_Kevin (2026-07-18 14:08:38+00:00): Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap in Brevard County, Florida! Please feel free to continue improving the map wherever it needs updating to make a free, open source map for all! If you have any questions, our wiki (https://osm.wiki) is a great resource or you can message me (another Brevard County native). Happy mapping!
Negreheb (2026-07-17 19:26:13+00:00): First of: Thank you for adding, i completely forgot i added these notes. 

If i could make some suggestions anyways: I don't think a charging station should get a name added. If for the location or adress, there is `object:street=*` for example. Also, the ref and the operator or network could make sense. 
Also, if i remember correctly, this station really has just one port available, the second one was... missing :D
RyanBush (2026-07-17 19:56:02+00:00): No worries, I have replaced the name with the ref which is visible.

I have changed the capacity & sockets to 1. It's a bit misleading as the front facing as both a "A" and "B" side to it.

See https://www.osm.org/changeset/185925859
Sakari_N (2026-07-23 14:27:11+00:00): Moi,

Olet lisännyt "Viholan veneramppi":n kahdesti, yhtä reaalimailman asiaa kuvataan vain yhdellä objektilla OSM:ssa. [1]

Lisäksi olet merkinnyt kyseisen luiskan operaattoriksi nokian kaupungin ja kolmella kielellä descriptionin siitä, että kaupunki ylläpitää kyseistä paikkaa. Onko tälle tiedolle joku lähde? Kyseistä luiskaa ei löydy nokian kaupungin nettisivuilta (muut kolme löytyy), ja lisäksi tuo paikka näyttää kohtalaisen autioituneelta.


[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
mewhenthe (2026-07-17 20:33:23+00:00): Hello! The description you added to https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14022840068 is not allowed because it contains marketing. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Spam#SEO_Spam.

I have went ahead and removed the tag for you.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2026-07-18 12:06:39+00:00): Hi!

Odonyms in French take dashes between each each word when the name is a person. I will put back the dashes. Thanks and have a nice day!
Baloo Uriza (2026-07-21 14:01:34+00:00): Name should only be the name, not the branch information, that's what the branch=* tag is for.  building=yes is more generic than building=garages.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185924865
caprieldeluca (2026-07-17 22:21:06+00:00): Hola, revisamos su cambio. Agregamos la oficina de mudanzas.

Por cualquier consulta o aclaración puede contactarse con la comunidad OpenStreetMap Argentina: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Argentina#Contacto
Michoo (2026-07-18 20:55:34+00:00): Cześć,
Jak na drugą edycję to nie jest źle. Wymiary dodanego przez Ciebie budynku są w porządku. Na stronie https://browser.dataspace.copernicus.eu/ można zobaczyć jak to mniej więcej wygląda w rzeczywistości.
Drobna uwaga, 
kolorem brązowym był oznaczony teren budowy, a nie budynek.
Nieco poprawiłem tagowanie parkingu, bo jest jeszcze w budowie.
Poza tym wszystko jest w porządku.

Powodzenia w dalszym mapowaniu!
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-18 08:16:06+00:00): SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more information.

Reverted incorrect change from location-specific to generic website=* URL and other SEO/malformed tags in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/185944552
Fischkopp0815 (2026-07-18 02:02:26+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/368774200#map=16/54.08958/9.07694

Ich halte die Küsterstraße nicht für highway=track , also einen Wirtschaftsweg für die Land- oder Forstwirtschaft in der freien Landschaft

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dtrack
Die Beschilderung mit Zeichen 239 spricht für highway=path

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=54.090375778641004&lng=9.073409043064203&z=17&pKey=5372408982866685&focus=photo

Aufgrund der Breite und dem zusätzlichen Zeichen 253 (Verbot für LKW) kann man es auch für highway=service oder sogar highway=residential halten.

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=54.090375778641004&lng=9.073409043064203&z=17&pKey=1160918107797688&focus=photo

Das Tagging wäre dann etwa so:

highway=service
foot=designated
hgv=no
motor_vehicle:conditional=delivery @ (18:30-09:30,12:00-14:00)

Wie siehst du das?

Nebenbei.Wurde die Küsterstraße renoviert? Die Bilder von Aug 2022 sagen surface=asphalt.
kloppi (2026-07-19 23:29:14+00:00): Danke für die Hinweise! Ja, die Straße wurde mit Backstein neu gepflastert und das Fußgängerschild von mapillary mit den Lieferzeiten habe ich nicht mehr gesehen. Es ist nur das LKW-Verbotschild geblieben. Autos können problemlos durchfahren. Ich habe es wie vorgeschlagen richtig auf highway=residential geändert. Nun sollte es passen.
LambdaComplex (2026-07-20 02:06:35+00:00): Se borró amenity=college?
eggie (2026-07-18 04:56:18+00:00): Hoi Jeroen,
Je hebt ook de afrit naar de staart (Baanhoekweg)  op construction gezet. 
Dat lijkt me niet goed. Ik draai dat weer even terug.
Je commentaar ontbreekt ook.. misschien vergeten?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-07-18 05:04:28+00:00): .. en ik bedoel uiteraard Nilodo. Zag dat Jeroen er ook aan had ge edit.
Ik heb de afrit naar de Staart weer van construction gehaald. Volgens mij is die afrit gewoon open.
Groet,
eggie
eggie (2026-07-18 05:06:55+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185939419
eggie (2026-07-18 07:03:15+00:00): Nog even op Melvin gekeken.
Ze zijn komende week wel bezig op de N3, maar ik kan me niet voorstellen dat de afrit naar de Baanhoekweg tot 21 april afgesloten blijft.
Volgens mij is Melvin abuis.
In dat geval zal toch ook de oprit vanaf Dordrecht Provincialeweg ook afgesloten moeten worden.
Ik ga toch nog een rondje fietsen en eens kijken. Ook wat de Brandweer van de aansluiting Baanhoekbrug heeft gemaakt.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-07-18 07:12:44+00:00): Dit is wat ik in de publicaties lees: De N3 gaat in beide richtingen dicht tussen de Burgemeester Keijzerweg in Papendrecht en de Merwedestraat in Dordrecht.
nilodo (2026-07-18 07:55:36+00:00): Groot excuus: dat was niet goed.
Cayenne17 (2026-07-18 09:57:39+00:00): Bonjour,
Je viens d'ajouter le SIRET + NAF : https://osmcha.org/changesets/185948713
wireguy (2026-07-18 10:09:25+00:00): Seth, welcome to osm.   A digit was missing from Todd and Rachel's phone number, I fixed that.  Since you have local knowledge, can you look at Steve's title and tag.  The poi is in the same building as Todd and Rachels.  Maybe it should be move to a different location? Also is the title place at 159 or 221?  Thanks for the updates, keep mapping!
MatzeDonien (2026-07-17 21:05:23+00:00): Mein erster Beitrag bei OSM. Sorry wenn nicht perfekt. Umleitung soll über die Straße Kattwykdamm erfolgen laut Schildern.
Der Weg direkt südlich vom Kattwykdamm ist eigentlich nur für Fußgänger erlaubt.
Cayenne17 (2026-07-18 09:54:08+00:00): Bonjour,
je viens d'ajouter le SIRET/SIREN: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185948583
uknown-gryphus (2026-07-24 03:52:31+00:00): Hi, I see you have made many edits to "expressways". These are classified as `highway=trunk` because they are explicitly *not* expressways. `highway=motorway` should only be used on access controlled roads which use the correct expressway signage. This is on the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India/Tags/Highway
neuhausr (2026-07-20 13:44:56+00:00): Hi, the feature North Fork Lmuma Creek (way 735379121) has only right angles now--I wonder if a tool in JOSM got applied accidentally or something. Could you take a look and fix? Thanks and happy mapping!
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-18 08:21:24+00:00): SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is not allowed on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account; see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more information. Furthermore, use of Google Maps as a source is strictly prohibited by both OSM and Google policies--see https://osm.wiki/Google 

Reverted adding SEO spam POI from prohibited source=* of Google Maps, in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/185944910
FajrAl (2026-07-18 22:18:41+00:00): Strangely, the user once use iD editor, and the rest use AI agent editor.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-18 22:27:33+00:00): Hey, somehow missed noticing that it was you on the other changeset! Funny enough, this guest villa is not too far from where my mom has been living in Bali with a family in a villa for the past year.

Yeah, is that what that is? It seemed like every changeset had a different unusual created_by=*, there were loads of weird, wonky and inconstant tagging and nearly half their changesets failed with 0 actual changes, which OSM.org doesn't directly show but you can see in OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/?filters=%7B%22users%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%22Vagabondcaravan%22%2C%22value%22%3A%22Vagabondcaravan%22%7D%5D%2C%22date__gte%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%22%22%2C%22value%22%3A%22%22%7D%5D%7D

Very strange, very strange indeed...
FajrAl (2026-07-19 13:02:11+00:00): I got informed that happened when you try to resolve conflicts, it will give you 0 changes. I once had it and in Neis, it appears in map as 0, 0 coordinate.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-19 16:19:31+00:00): Ah, huh. I had it happen to me once (with JOSM), early on in my mapping and I assumed it was a failed upload of some sort, and it appeared as "unknown" country on HDYC with 0 changes (I have 1 other "unknown" country from more recently, but that has actual changes).

However, I suspect in this case it is most likely due to whatever tool(s)/AI(s) they are using to try to make their changesets is failing/making bad requests to the API nearly half the time resulting in bad changesets.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-18 08:21:36+00:00): SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is not allowed on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account; see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more information. Furthermore, use of Google Maps as a source is strictly prohibited by both OSM and Google policies--see https://osm.wiki/Google 

Reverted adding SEO spam POI from prohibited source=* of Google Maps, in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/185944910
felipeeugenio (2026-07-18 14:00:08+00:00): Hola. Living_street (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dliving_street) es una calle donde se mezclan un poco los derechos de peatones y autos. Hay velocidades máximas reducidas, puede haber señalizaciones de niños jugando en la calle y generalmente no hay veredas o están pegadas a la calle al mismo nivel.

Esta calle no cumple con ninguno de estos requerimientos, salvo por el hecho de que sea sin salida, entonces tiene muy poco tráfico.

Las clasificaciones en general son muy complejas de definir y es una mezcla de atributos físicos de las calles y sus funciones dentro de la red.

por eso es bueno estar en el chat de la comunidad para conversar este tipo de cosas que son un poco más "grises".

Saludos
mirabilos (2026-07-18 21:01:53+00:00): AFAIU OSM should show the *current* state, and this should be mapped as temporarily removed or under construction, and then changed back to normal later when it re-enters normal operation.
pfhllnts (2026-07-19 09:31:51+00:00): Indeed, I wanted to map my line 55 ride today and was unpleasantly surprised that you simply reverted my change silently.

I do not really need to tell you that the OSM principles say "map what's on the ground", "do not map objects if they do not exist currently" and, yes, also "don't map temporary features".

However "temporary" is defined as weeks or months, not a whole year. STIB-MIVB themselves have removed the track and even placed the crossover such that the western platform at Tilleui - Linde is currently not fully usable, that's a verifiable fact and I can even upload a photo of the current situation somewhere if desired.

I would agree with you if the change were only for some weeks or months. But here we're talking about a longer, persistent change also affecting at what platform people can get off and on the tram: the eastern one only.  So strictly speaking one could even consider marking the western use and currently not in use. Other mappers would even go as far as marking the entire section up to Paix - Vrede as construction:rail=tram but that's beyond the scope of the change at hand here.

So please undo your revert, thank you.
Brigadeleiter (2026-07-19 10:31:20+00:00): It's a fact that the track towards Da Vinci has been cut of for a (provisional) crossover reaching the other track for reversing.
The construction works are ongoing over more than two years until mid-2027. You can discuss, whether it makes sense mapping short term works (e.g. a month) but in that case we're talking about a very long time. OSM-Wiki mentions a duration of more than 6-9 months for mapping construction works, see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:construction
bxl-forever (2026-07-19 11:02:56+00:00): Hello pfhllnts/mirabilos/Brigadeleiter.
Well… you reverted it yourself now, so we’ll keep it.

By the way, it is really fascinating to see 3 mappers showing up at the same time, two of whom having never edited in Belgium, but all of them suddenly showing a very strong interest in this small piece of track in a very short time.
pfhllnts (2026-07-19 11:43:39+00:00): Well, I do like me a conspiracy theory sometimes, so it could be my socket puppets. Or it could be that we travelled together and it's sufficient if one does the editing for everyone else. Or it could be that I ask other mappers to review my change to get feedback whether I interpret common practice and our "rules" wrong, especially when someone with a longer OSM editing history and better local knowledge reverts one of my changes.

Which brings me to the point that I feel I have to reiterate that my changes are not to piss you or anyone else off but to improve the map. I do value you reviewing them and keeping an eye on Bruxelles in general as long as it also allows me to learn about possible mistakes and local conventions such as the dot in x.yyy numbers. And I did e.g. meanwhile also find a way to add missing switch nodes at the right position even when "out in the wild" mapping with only the mobile phone at hand.
mirabilos (2026-07-19 19:37:32+00:00): OT, but: not a sockpuppet, but I also don’t have equipment for full-blown from-scratch mapping, I tend to just fix small things I notice while in some area (or, as in this case, otherwise).