piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
gurglypipe (2023-01-31 12:07:49+00:00): Hi, are you sure about the edits to the RNLI museum and shop? The tagging of the area and the node now looks confusing: both are tagged as museums; and while the node is also tagged as a shop, it has alt_name= and designation= which imply it’s a museum.
chris_debian (2023-01-31 12:42:31+00:00): Hi,

I thought the tagging was confused, but my intention wasn't to worsen the situation. Do you think the change should be reverted, or something else? I appreciate your feedback.

Chris.
gurglypipe (2023-01-31 13:02:16+00:00): Heya, probably simplest just to do a bit of research (either a local survey or looking at the museum/shop website) and do another edit to separate out the tagging a bit more based on what the research says.

My guess would be that the area should be the museum, with most of the address and name tagging on it, and the shop should be the node inside (with less of the general tagging on it because that’s covered by the surrounding area already). But I’m not local, so that’s just an armchair guess! :)
gurglypipe (2023-02-03 00:34:34+00:00): I went ahead and made those changes in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132023172
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-07 10:41:41+00:00): Thank you for mapping. There are some floating buildings as well. Please verify using different imagery to confirm whether it is building or not and provide changeset comment as well. Happy Mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131887176
rarad74 (2023-01-30 16:29:49+00:00): Te rog sa folosesti diacritice , sau nu mai adauga nume fara diacritice. Multumim.
Rezequiel (2023-01-30 16:04:01+00:00): extensión adicional*
CurlingMan13 (2023-01-30 22:31:55+00:00): Did a couple adjustments to make sure tags were correct and removed the personal info in the operator field.  Changeset looks good!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131887641
abakus_uploader (2023-01-30 23:34:29+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
gscscnd (2023-01-30 16:32:10+00:00): Dzięki!
CurlingMan13 (2023-01-30 22:32:05+00:00): Did a couple adjustments to make sure tags were correct and removed the personal info in the operator field.  Changeset looks good!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131887694
Allison P (2023-02-01 05:19:54+00:00): W Germantown Pike -> West Germantown Pike?

According to wiki it's okay and appropriate to list the owner's name https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:operator
wkdgs (2023-01-31 10:25:30+00:00): Hi,

willkommen bei OpenStreetMap und Danke, dass du dabei hilfst die Karte zu verbessern.

Bei deinen letzten Änderungen an der Feuerwache ist mir aufgefallen, dass du die einzelnen Tore der Feuerwache sehr detailliert eingetragen hast. Leider ist es aktuell so gemappt, dass jedes der Tore eine eigene Feuerwache darstellt. Mit eigener Adresse und eigenem Namen.

Eine Feuerwache wird üblicherweise wie folgt gemappt werden:

Das gesamte Geländer der Feuerwache zeichnest du als Fläche ein und gibst ihm den Tag "amenity=fire_station". An diese Fläche trägst du auch alle Informationen, die die gesamte Wache betreffen. Also "addr", "name", "operator", etc.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dfire_station

Jedes Gebäude der Wache bekommt den Tag "building=fire_station" und alle Infos die nur dieses Gebäude betreffen. Z.B. "building:levels" oder "description" mit einer kurzen Beschreibung der Funktion.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:building%3Dfire_station

Falls du die Tore genauer eintragen willst, könntest du einen Punkt auf der Außenmauer des Gebäudes mit "entrance=yes", "entrance=garage" oder so ähnlich eintragen. Das ist aber nicht üblich.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:entrance

Gruß
wkdgs
habi (2023-01-30 19:14:23+00:00): Die finden, sie heissen "fairjeans | REVIVI", siehe Diskussion in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131839222.
Ich hab' das nochmals geändert :)
Piagno (2023-01-30 19:23:43+00:00): Oh, das hatte ich nicht gesehen. Ich dachte ich tue Revivi nach vorne, weil auf der Website "Revivi" viel prominenter ist. Danke fürs anpassen ;)
ivanbranco (2023-01-31 09:29:11+00:00): Ciao Nicolò, benvenuto su OSM,

quindi questo toponimo non è piu' in uso? Nemmeno per indicare il nome di quella frazione/quartiere di Cenate Sotto?
Nicolò Luigi Allegris (2023-01-31 11:08:40+00:00): esatto
NorthCrab (2023-01-31 04:07:08+00:00): Wstrzymałem tą edycję ponieważ nie wierzę aby ten budynek miał taką nazwę. Jeśli chodziło ci o oznaczenie POI to proszę użyj dodatkowych tagów.
Zwiadowca21 (2023-02-06 21:28:50+00:00): Wiarę zostawmy w kościele. Mozna użyć Google.
NorthCrab (2023-02-07 07:31:34+00:00): Nie, nie można. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-06 11:54:29+00:00): Thank you for mapping. It would be great if you could provide changeset comments to know what have you done. Happy mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131888153
DD1GJ (2023-01-30 17:05:44+00:00): Änderung zurückgesetzt, highway=path ist bei gemeinsam genutzten Geh-/Radwegen korrekt und gebrächlich

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:highway?uselang=de#Pfade
midnightcomm (2023-02-17 04:47:13+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Often we'll want to describe what the changes made accomplished. Perhaps re-align a road, adding a Point of Interest et cetra.
habi (2023-01-30 19:07:06+00:00): Mersi!
balchen (2023-03-20 08:13:11+00:00): Hva tenker vi om g/s-vei som passerer busstopp? Skal det være fortau akkurat der hvor det er busstopp?
FennecusZerda (2023-03-20 14:16:38+00:00): Hei. Ja, jeg tenker det, i og med at 1) det er lov å sykle på fortau i Norge, 2) det er det faktiske anlegget som tilbys her. og OSM ønsker å dokumentere det som faktisk finnes og 3) det finnes bedre løsninger med f.eks. sykkelveg bak. Så det er litt i samme gate som dine forslag om sykkeltagging. Da får vi - som en bieffekt - synliggjort hvor dårlig denne løsningen er mange steder i Norge. 
Men, når det er sagt, jeg kan la meg overbevise om noe annet også. Hvis du kan argumentere godt for noe annet?! :)
balchen (2023-03-20 17:41:42+00:00): Jeg er ambivalent. På den ene siden er jeg 100% for å vise at det er usammenhengende sykkelvei. På den andre siden vet jeg at det formelt regnes som g/s-vei (og det finnes spesiallagde trafikkregler for nettopp den typen g/s-vei). Heller mot det samme som deg, men er litt usikker.

Se f. eks. https://goo.gl/maps/CVEoPbZTf78xaBWm6

Dette blir vel det samme? Tenker du at det må være en minste utstrekning på busstoppet før dette blir aktuelt? Eller skal alle busstopp bli slik?
FennecusZerda (2023-03-21 13:59:49+00:00): Har ikke tenkt på noen spesiell utstrekning eller system på dette dessverre. Jeg har tenkt at så lenge det er kantstein (vanlig eller busstopp-typen) så er det fortau. Er også der jeg bytter fra GS-veg til fortau ellers. Noe som det også finnes mange av.

Hva slags GS-regler tenker du på forresten? Er det noe annet enn: "Den som vil kjøre forbi til høyre for sporvogn ved holdeplass uten trafikkøy, skal stanse og gi fri veg for passasjerer som stiger av eller vil stige på.
Det samme gjelder for syklende og fører av liten elektrisk motorvogn som vil kjøre forbi til høyre for buss ved holdeplass."?
balchen (2023-03-21 14:05:05+00:00): Ja, det er den regelen. I lovkommentarene står det at den ble innført pga. at SVV så at deres strategi med bussholdeplass-på-g/s-vei hadde noen negative konsekvenser.

Interessant nok står det i trafikkreglene at kantstein kan brukes for å skille gangvei/sykkelvei fra kjørevei. Det samme gjelder fortau, men forskjellen er at fortau ikke kan skilles med grøft, rabatt eller gjerde slik g/s-vei kan. Så det er ganske tvetydig hva dette egentlig er.
Waaslander (2023-01-30 16:38:53+00:00): *noch
canfe (2023-01-30 17:07:29+00:00): Le case non sono belle squadrate.
Usa il tasto Q su ID per renderle ortogonali.
Queste le ho corrette io
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131888978
eggie (2023-01-30 17:44:13+00:00): Zie hier...  maar wellicht had je het al gevonden.?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Drecycling

Mapse
eggie
habi (2023-01-30 19:06:51+00:00): Mersi!
sannkc (2023-01-30 20:24:32+00:00): Thanks for adding these bus stops along North Oak.  

A couple of tips for future edits:

When adding names, please avoid the use of abbreviations.  Spell the words out instead.  This is standard OSM practice (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Abbreviations).   

Also, OSM mappers generally don't include directional information when naming bus stops.  Doing so can interfere with the way that some renderers depict bus stop pairs and there are times when such information can cause confusion, such as situations where users plan to use the bus to connect to another bus headed in a different direction or where overlapping bus routes use the same stop for buses headed in different directions.  When it does happen, it's usually because someone has done a mass import of transit agency data into the map without customizing it for OSM use.
mazes-end (2023-01-31 00:44:38+00:00): So for some of the stops I have added in this, what would be the proper formatting for the name?
sannkc (2023-01-31 03:24:32+00:00): The most common formats in the US are: [main road] at [cross street], or: [main road] & [cross street]

I most often use [main road] at [cross street], because that's the format used by RideKC for station names along the MAX bus routes.

It's not a perfect science though, and there are exceptions, such as when a stop is named after a landmark (e.g., Crown Center) or when no cross street exists and an address is used instead.

Beyond that, OSM uses relations to assign individual bus stops to the appropriate bus route, which enables router apps to direct users to the appropriate stop for boarding the correct bus.  That gets more complicated, but if you're looking for a model to follow, the bus routes in the San Francisco Bay area are all well-mapped.  Here is a good example of one: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5845175388

The OSM wiki pages on buses offer additional guidance:  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Buses

Hope that helps!
sannkc (2023-01-30 19:57:19+00:00): The most likely reason is that the excluded parts comprise different subdivisions than Crestview.  The county parcel data for this area shows two smaller subdivisions that are not actually part of the Crestview subdivision.  The initial mapper most likely intended to map the subdivision, not the neighborhood.  Mapping subdivisions is often preferable to mapping neighborhoods because subdivisions have defined legal boundaries whereas neighborhood boundaries are more fluid and subjective.
VictorIE (2023-07-14 22:29:27+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10594548815

Should man_made=plaque be

historic=memorial
memorial=plaque
danieldegroot2 (2023-07-15 17:18:04+00:00): name: [fire insurance] mark/plaque
object type wikidata: Q2894464
status: historic, though generally still in use in some places -not here ofc-

it could be argued they were left in place to commemorate the time in which they were used by fire fighters, but it isn't as much an active memorial

alternatively man_made=sign though it might confuse people not instantly thinking of traffic signs.
CurlingMan13 (2023-01-30 22:29:16+00:00): I concur.  I have been working to remove "abandoned" and "disused" railways that have long since been removed and built over.  The wiki says something along the lines of "abandoned" railways are those with rails, signals or railbeds present.  In this case, what you removed has no trace.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131889638
ivanbranco (2023-01-31 09:08:09+00:00): Hi Haileyferg, welcome to OSM,

you added two bars nearby with a similar name, "Bosnia wine bar" and "Boscia wine bar". It's a duplicate bar or are them two different places? Also if they are indoor bars they should be mapped inside the building outline.

You added a "Bar Roma Granita" restaurant nearby the "Bar Roma dello Zio Aurelio" cafe, similar name but not exactly, same place or not?

Please double check when you add a place name, you added "Antica Pizzaria La Grotto" instead of "Antica Pizzeria La Grotta".

Good mapping
bxl-forever (2023-01-30 23:55:41+00:00): Hello,

Sorry but some of those "fixes" are wrong.  I guess you found a tool that encouraged you to fix/simplify the shape of buildings in Brussels, and by doing this you created shapes that do not match the official outlines of buildings.

In addition, please keep your changes local and upload them before moving on to another city or country.
BBJIB (2023-01-31 07:47:25+00:00): Hello, thanks a lot for your feedback and sorry for any wrong edits. The suggestions are taken from the list of issues/warnings at the right-hand side of the in-browser editor at openstreetmap.org. They seemed legitimate to me but I'll take your experience for a better guideline :)  As well, thanks for the heads-up on grouping edits geographically. Do you think the other edited issues are good? (Adding suggested tags, deleting empty point markers...)
bxl-forever (2023-01-31 09:10:07+00:00): The other edits, such as filling additional wikidata links to brands (car-sharing, post offices, banks) seem correct.
Fidelis Assis (2023-01-30 23:48:09+00:00): Olá, Bem Mapas, tudo bem?
Esse trecho ficou com uma inconsistência entre as velocidades máximas do radar e da via. Como o trecho onde estão os 2 radares, atuando em direções opostas, está com velocidades diferentes em cada sentido (50 em um, 80 no outro) a velocidade 80 vai sempre conflitrar com um dos dois radares já que são ambos de 50.

Minha sugestão é fazer os cortes não nos pontos dos radares mas nas 2 placas de limite de velocidade que antecedem os radares e definir 50 como velocidade única nesse trecho. Uma das placas de velocidade eu já havia mapeado, a outra identifiquei (Bing) e mapeei hoje.

Nesse link fica mais claro onde elas estão (e onde podem ser feitos os cortes, talvez um pouco antes de cada uma para que elas mesmas não fiquem em 2 trechos ao mesmo tempo, o que pode gerar confusão) :

https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?node=6023884520#map=18/-21.65538/-42.30174

E depois  colocar a velocidade máxima de 50 no trecho entre as placas e manter 80 antes e depois.

Abraços e bons mapeamentos!
Fidelis Assis (2023-01-31 01:06:40+00:00): Esqueci de colocar, essa query mostra os locais com inconsitência entre as velocidades do trecho e do radar. Ela está configurada para busca no Estado do Rio, mas você pode editar para fazer buscas em ouras UFs, municípios ou bbox:

https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1qNp

Abraços.
Allison P (2023-01-30 22:22:00+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap! You have added the name to a road junction, rather than an actual road. Which road were you meaning to change the name of?

Also, note that road names are expanded on OpenStreetMap. This means all directions and suffixes should be spelled out (E -> East, Rd -> Road, etc.)
Tomas Straupis (2023-01-31 06:33:15+00:00): Ar tikrai čia yra kūdra? Pagal įvairias ortofoto įvairių periodų čia lauko žemuma, tai kartais ten gali kauptis vanduo. Pagal valstybinius duomenis šioje vietoje irgi nėra jokio vandens: https://www.geoportal.lt/map/#s=3346&x=586378.2705461348&y=6086657.249674606&l=11&b=default
NorthCrab (2023-01-31 03:32:39+00:00): Wypadałoby trochę jaśniej opisywać zmiany bo nie wiadomo o co chodzi. "." nic nie mówi. Takie zachowanie jest bardzo samolubne.
marczoutendijk (2023-03-11 16:11:11+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6939

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
pio2_122 (2023-01-30 18:15:02+00:00): Na zdjęciach z Geoportalu (które były używane podczas edytowania) jednoznacznie widać, że wyznaczona i używana jest tylko jedna droga startowa. Po dodanych nie ma już śladu. W danych OSM są już one oznaczone jako disused:aeroway. W związku z tym, edycja została wycofana.

Poza tym, w dalszym ciągu przypominam o wymogach dot. edycji z https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6537. Ignorowanie ich będzie skutkowało kolejną blokadą.
marczoutendijk (2023-03-11 16:11:32+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6939
 
Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
Tomas_J (2023-08-10 05:07:46+00:00): ...obecný název Polyfunkční hala nepatří do name... :)
M a r k u s (2023-08-30 08:02:28+00:00): Tomáši, při editaci pokud možno vycházím z oficiálních zdrojů a Štěrboholský úřad a i investor halu takto pojmenovává viz https://www.sterboholy.cz/prakticke-informace/developerske-projekty . Věřím, že až bude práce dokončena, někdo jméno vymyslí a pak dojde k jeho změně. Hodila by se "Nová Cihelna", nebo něco podobného.
Rezequiel (2023-01-30 18:09:46+00:00): Esto se debe a la frecuencia con la que las personas usan el nombre corto viejo y el propuesto en este cambio.
jeka p (2023-06-25 18:53:24+00:00): Hallo,

ich bin den Arlbergpass 3 Mal in den letzten WOche durchgefahren:
- es ist sind klare 60 km/h in Langen am Arlberg.
Anfang Richtung Bregenz bereits im Tunnel:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11006069248
Anfang Richtung Tirol:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9797285707
Es ist auch seit mehreren Jahren so...

LG
Jeka
mcliquid (2023-06-26 06:38:50+00:00): Hallo Jeka,
In Richtung Bregenz wird im Tunnel auf 60 km/h reduziert, das ist korrekt. Aber hier kommt das Ortsschild und dort ist kein Zusatzzeichen mit 60 km/h montiert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1165759777
Deshalb gilt hier 50 km/h oder etwa nicht? Interpretiere ich hier das Gesetz falsch? https://www.jusline.at/gesetz/stvo/paragraf/20

(Übrigens hast du das Ortsschild jetzt doppelt eingetragen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11006069249)

Auszug: "Sofern die Behörde nicht gemäß § 43 eine geringere Höchstgeschwindigkeit erläßt oder eine höhere Geschwindigkeit erlaubt, darf der Lenker eines Fahrzeuges im Ortsgebiet nicht schneller als 50 km/h, auf Autobahnen nicht schneller als 130 km/h und auf den übrigen Freilandstraßen nicht schneller als 100 km/h fahren.".

An dieser Stelle in Richtung Innsbruck endet das Ortsgebiet und es gilt somit Tempo 100 km/h, da kein anderes Schild hier begrenzt. Nach 55 Metern erscheint eine 80 km/h Tafel vor dem Tunnel, aber nur Richtung Innsbruck. Siehe https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1071212043783350 oder im Zweifel auch Google StreetView.

Auf der L97 von Richtung Bregenz nach Innsbruck fahrend, ist vor dem Fuchslochtunnel ein 60 km/h für beide Richtungen installiert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9797285707 welches im Ort nicht mehr durch ein Ortsschild aufgehoben wird, da dieses viel früher installiert ist: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10594665950

Aus meiner Sicht ergibt das ein unterschiedliches maxspeed im Ort, welches zu folgendem Tagging führt:
maxspeed:backward=60
maxspeed:forward=50

Übersehe ich noch etwas?
Nakaner (2023-03-08 11:50:55+00:00): Hi,

why did you remove boundary=administrative from https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/357968

Best regards

Michael
Diacritic (2023-01-31 10:54:59+00:00): Hi Derrick,

I understand what you are trying to do to get the node to "render" as you prefer, but Clayton North does not fit the definition of a quarter (indeed, the tag is not used in Australia).

Mistagging for the renderer (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer) is considered bad practice. Please leave Clayton North correctly tagged as a neighbourhood.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-30 18:34:12+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-30 18:35:41+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 131879660, 131879689, 131881254, 131883818.
Langlaeufer (2023-01-31 01:54:26+00:00): Ich denke da wollte jemand  darauf hinweisen, dass das Gehen in den Loipen nicht gestattet ist
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131892585
38446 (2023-01-31 06:38:18+00:00): Ja, das ist so. Ich bin mir nur noch nicht ganz schlüssig, wie das abzubilden ist - conditional restriction mit Freitext oder einfach description oder note. So, wie es war, jedenfalls nicht - das Verbot erstreckt sich ja nicht auf den ganzen Winter. Gib mir noch ein paar Tage...
Friendly_Ghost (2023-01-30 20:44:04+00:00): Hello MinasMukash, and welcome to OSM!

Borders are delicate objects in OSM, and should be treated with care. As such, changes to borders are always made with community consensus. 

In this edit you broke some borders, for example you removed https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/130207707 from https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3788824/. This and other edits have broken the continuity of the boundaries.

Moreover, the Ukrainian OSM community urges everyone to refrain from editing the map of Ukraine during the war. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Russian-Ukrainian_war for relevant documentation.

To repair the boundaries, I have reverted your edit here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131896179

If you wish to discuss the status of boundaries, please do so on the forum: https://community.openstreetmap.org/

Best regards,

Casper
wkdgs (2023-01-31 10:08:43+00:00): Bist du sicher, dass "surface=sand" hier richtig ist? Damit ist eigentlich loser Sand gemeint, der sich nicht besonders gut für Fahrräder eignet:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:surface

Ist es vielleicht eher "surface=compacted" oder "surface=ground"?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131892867
alter_stromer (2023-01-31 15:43:23+00:00): ich hatte gestern schon meine Bedenken - es ist zwar eine Sandoberfläche aber verdichtet, daher für Radfahrer geeignet - ich werde auf "surface=compact"gehen - das trifft es besser - Danke für den Tip
SomeoneElse (2023-01-30 19:19:32+00:00): This appears to be a mechanical edit.  Please explain where you discussed it with the community, what your source was, and what the licence was.
tbicr (2023-01-30 19:49:12+00:00): Hey, I just removed `name:be-x-old` and move it to `name:be-tarask` or `name:be-tarask:word_stress` if it contains stress character, so I don't add any data there

`name:be-x-old` is not valid language tag and `name:be-tarask` should be used instead, there are some wiki links described it https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Be:Belarus:%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B2%D1%96%D0%BB%D1%8B_%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%BF%D1%96%D1%81%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8F_%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D1%9E and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multilingual_names#Belarus, perhaps `name:be-x-old` related to Id editor bug https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/pull/2875

so, as I don't add any new data and just use osm data from `name:be-x-old` license should be same as osm data had
Haryadissj (2023-01-31 09:38:40+00:00): Ewok kuliner
SomeoneElse (2023-01-31 09:43:05+00:00): Thanks for the explanation.  It would have been great if you'd said something a bit more like than instead of "add name stress 1/1 " in the original comment!
I know we're limited to 255 characters, but it's also possible to "continue the comment in the discussion" - have a reasonably descriptive summary in the comment, and the rest of the explanation in the discussion.