piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
silversurfer83 (2023-08-25 16:38:07+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM :)

you asked for review of your changeset. Here's my review:
Looks good :) keep it up.

Here are some helpful links to the wiki should you decide to keep helping with the map. And in case of questions please don't hesitate to reach out.

happy mapping
silversurfer83

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Map_Features
https://learnosm.org/de/beginner/
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contact_channels#Chats.2Fmessengers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140375430
Nano Iglesias (2023-08-25 14:44:11+00:00): Please don´t draw something that people will interpretate like a paved road there, when use OSMand navigation app. It´s dangerous and delusional. There is nothing there, only a shy path in the dessert , crossing small sand rivers . Only for 4x4. 
When they build a paved road, we´ll be happy to draw it there.
SekeRob (2024-06-26 09:20:02+00:00): Hi,

Discovered on a long stretch of motorway along Silvi which you placed many cuts and thus many parts turning version 1 there's maxweight=3.5 tags which makes it practically impossible for HGV to use the motorway while standing on several overpass bridges watching traffic it's an endless stream of heavies that even when empty weigh much more. The first entry I found in CS https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/79535110#map=13/42.5652/14.0876 in 2020. Does not make OSM very trustworthy for route planners (vaguely remember there was a traffic issue after the Genova bridge collapse where viaducts had limits until inspection was completed, but that's long past tense)
Anyway, I deleted what I found in the dataset I had loaded, doubtlessly there being many more where this came from.

ciao
Sergiy Kozyr (2023-08-25 14:49:47+00:00): This changeset reverts changesets #140362742 and #140364808 by NikEdGib
NorthCrab (2023-08-25 14:53:48+00:00): But why me :D I am running a bot which performs a mass revert on the last nights vandalism.

Please notice: https://osm.mapki.com/history/node/619715817
secondaryhighway (2023-08-25 21:17:59+00:00): how does that make it a primary road
ma-rt-in (2023-08-26 16:28:03+00:00): Hallo,

ist es tatsächlich das Gebäude 2 Häuser weiter wie erfasst? Kommt mir komisch vor.

vg
Teddy73 (2023-08-26 16:52:49+00:00): Hi, wenn du die Feuerwehr Bäsch meinst, hab das mal korrigiert.
Syl (2024-01-06 18:22:11+00:00): Même remarque qu'ici : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140895441
Que s'est-il passé ?
JLZIMMERMANN (2024-01-07 08:51:36+00:00): corrections effectuées
Patrickov (2023-08-25 17:20:24+00:00): Contrary to X89D (which is separate), X42C is NOT
Patrickov (2023-08-25 17:21:24+00:00): FYI

https://www.legco.gov.hk/yr2022/chinese/subleg/negative/2022ln118-c.pdf

https://www.legco.gov.hk/yr2022/english/subleg/negative/2022ln118-e.pdf
samho1234567 (2023-08-26 13:01:23+00:00): OK. I've just updated route master.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140410619
samho1234567 (2023-08-26 13:12:57+00:00): I'd like to ask you what is StreetComplete App?
Patrickov (2023-08-26 13:14:57+00:00): A mobile app for lazy people to do small edits here and there
Patrickov (2023-08-26 13:16:12+00:00): https://streetcomplete.app/

I just fooled around a while ago because I found something worth uploading on the streets.  Seriously, though, I think it's better to organize the result of a survey and do a serious edit accordingly
Langlaeufer (2023-08-26 20:09:18+00:00): Hallo happy-landings,
Ist auf dem Weg Radfahren (per Schild) verboten?
Anderenfalls wäre es ggf. ein Mehrzweckweg (path)
Grüße langläufer
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140376704
happy-landings (2023-08-27 13:21:06+00:00): Hallo, ja, das wäre wahrscheinlich richtiger. Ich konnte das in Vespucci nicht sicher erkennen, als ich den Pfad angelegt habe.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140376704
NorthCrab (2023-08-25 15:12:16+00:00): I kindly ask you to stop, you are adding back slurs onto the map: https://osm.mapki.com/history/way/36448674
Nano Iglesias (2023-08-25 15:08:10+00:00): Well Tafraout Sidi Ali is the name posted in all the maps from everywhere.
Awoobis (2023-08-25 15:43:57+00:00): You've got played since names tags are incorrect https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30281812/history
NorthCrab (2023-08-25 16:13:48+00:00): I am now running a third revert pass to hopefully fix accidents like these :-)
Nano Iglesias (2023-08-25 15:12:51+00:00): a moderator should take a look on that.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-08-31 05:40:56+00:00): Reverted by DWG for poor mapping

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140617127
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-08-27 15:41:31+00:00): Are you using Google Maps as source?
user_5359 (2023-08-26 06:51:42+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I remove your SEO SPAM entry (mostly foreign keys).
Tomas Straupis (2023-08-27 17:24:27+00:00): Šaligatvių ir panašių mikrodalykų, kurie yra gatvės dalis atskirais vektoriais nežymime. Tai naudos jokios neduoda, tik padaro redagavimą sudėtingesniu. Jei yra poreikis pažymėti, kad kelias turi dvirtakį, galima prie esamo kelio pridėti žymas cycleway=left|right|both
Warin61 (2023-08-25 23:43:01+00:00): Hi,

The footway (way 1202026342 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1202026342#map=18/-37.86047/144.74936) is wrong... in that it crosses it self. While a human can understand it a computer makes hard work of it. 

See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=144.74859&lat=-37.85975&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

The 'duplicate segment' is the issue. What is required is a 'multipolygon relation' with 2 ways - and 'outer' alone the outside of the footway and an 'inner' along the inside of the footway.

See 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon#One_outer_and_one_inner_ring
silversurfer83 (2023-08-25 16:34:49+00:00): Gude :)

Hinweis zu dieser Änderung:
Du hast jetzt an das gesamte Gebäude, welches auf dem Luftbild nach mindestens einem Mehrfamilienhaus aussieht, den Namen eines Physios getaggt. Es ist besser, wenn solche Objekte (Points Of Interest, POI) als einzelne Punkte im betreffenden Gebäude erstellt werden und dann sollte auch die passende Eigenschaft gesetzt werden. Ich werde das mal tun, du kannst dann gerne noch Kontaktdaten und Öffnungszeiten ergänzen.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11144344065
Ist das Haarstudio noch im Gebäude?

Bei Fragen immer raus damit :)

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140378617
altoing (2023-08-27 15:25:51+00:00): Добрый день! Нарисованный вами лес залез реку Сок, а scrub на соседние поселки. Такие элементы нужно рисовать в их фактических границах, а то что вы нарисовали явно не соответствует действительности. Исправьте пожалуйста. И используйте пожалуйста осмысленные комментарии к правкам, а не "1", так всем будет намного проще понять что вы изменили.
Taya_S (2023-08-26 06:05:14+00:00): It seems you changed the railway tag from
"railway=rail" to "railway=railoperator=CAMRAIL" in a lot of places
stan_ (2023-08-26 07:47:50+00:00): Thanks, Thiskal, for letting me know. I hope I found them all...
Taya_S (2023-08-26 08:25:54+00:00): No problem. I think there are still some areas missing here https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=12/5.5326/13.3645

You can see all the changes here. Might make it a bit better to figure out what was changed. 
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=140378822


Sincerely,
Taya
stan_ (2023-09-09 13:10:15+00:00): This is great use, thx!
It seems that in most zoom levels there's the railway line visible again, so I guess the rest will follow soon
Fizzie-DWG (2023-12-19 06:47:12+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145278018
Fizzie-DWG (2023-08-30 05:05:57+00:00): Reverted by DWG due to poor quality mapping

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140568680
Fizzie-DWG (2023-08-30 05:04:58+00:00): Reverted by DWG due to poor quality mapping

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140568662
Fizzie-DWG (2023-08-30 05:03:48+00:00): Reverted by DWG due to poor quality mapping

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140568633
eggie (2023-08-25 16:50:26+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedbackk  Dit is wat je hebt gedaan.. 
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=140379214
Je zou nog eens kunnen kijken welke tags daar bij horen
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station
MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
traveleditor (2023-08-25 15:58:59+00:00): 1,344 changesets (mostly reverts) today? Keep up the good work!
NorthCrab (2023-08-25 16:05:20+00:00): This is all automatic but thanks !
Taya_S (2023-08-25 16:39:16+00:00): Its still really impressive. With the amount of damage done this might have taken weeks to undo otherwise.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-03-14 01:51:58+00:00): Reverted by DWG - apparent undiscussed OEG Import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163594030
Frans S (2023-08-26 10:28:11+00:00): Hello. 
Your mapping are rather accurate.
 
Please do not map buildings and let them cross roads. Never seen a road going through a building. Just move the nodes of the road a bit aside.
You have been warned about this when you uploaded your mappings.
Please solve these issues first.
Best regards and keep mapping
eggie (2023-08-25 16:55:15+00:00): Dag Cade .. Een grens is geen weg en routeert niet. Je had het voetpad aan de grens vast gemaakt. Ik heb 'm doorverbonden met de weg.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=140380167
MVG
eggie
Qwajo OSM (2023-09-09 12:46:53+00:00): Hello Liza Ayoo the great mapper, thanks for mapping. Take note that shape and size of buildings matter in terms of data quality in OSM. So kindly press Q to give buildings the perfect shape after mapping them. Thank you and keep mapping!
Liza Ayoo (2023-09-09 15:01:15+00:00): Hi Qwajo, thank you for the insight, I will definitely adopt this from now on. Thanks again
eggie (2023-08-25 16:56:47+00:00): Dag Onweerwold.. Waarom staat er de regel note=closed ?

MVG
eggie
Onweerwolf (2023-08-25 16:59:52+00:00): Ik heb geen idee waar dat staat, wat het betekent of waarom. Ik heb alleen een website adres proberen toe te voegen.
Onweerwolf (2023-08-25 17:01:47+00:00): Ik heb het net gecheckt en de website link werkt gewoon.
eggie (2023-08-25 17:12:40+00:00): Wanneer je kiest voor alle tags zichtbaar zie je de regels staan. Als de camping gewoon open is dan kan die regel verwijderd worden.
Gr eggie
eggie (2023-08-25 17:13:29+00:00): Hier zie je de tags staan
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/58918186
Onweerwolf (2023-08-25 17:16:25+00:00): Ik heb daar niets aan veranderd.
eggie (2023-08-25 17:21:11+00:00): Nee.. maar het viel mij gewoon op. Waarom zette de voorgaande mapper hier closed neer? Is dat nog van toepassing?
Onweerwolf (2023-08-25 17:24:36+00:00): Waarom vraag je het dan aan mij en niet aan de persoon die het zo heeft ingevoerd?
eggie (2023-08-25 17:30:44+00:00): Omdat dit een bijdrage is van een jaar geleden.
Wellicht weet jij of de camping open is?
Ik haal de tag dat de camping gesloten is wel weg.
MVG
eggie
Onweerwolf (2023-08-25 17:38:32+00:00): Nogmaals: ik weet niet wat het betekent en zoals je zelf al hebt bevestigd ben ik niet degene die het heeft aangepast. Ik kan hier niets mee, je moet het aan de persoon vragen die het zo heeft ingevoerd.
eggie (2023-08-25 17:42:01+00:00): Het betekent dat die camping gesloten is.
Jij past iets aan hier. Ik valideer alleen maar. Iets wat gesloten was kan toch inmiddels al weer open zijn. Vandaar de vraag.
Don't shoot the validator.
Gr eggie
Onweerwolf (2023-08-25 17:49:54+00:00): Je begint nu vervelend te worden met je gedram. Het is niet door mij aangepast, vraag het aan degene die het heeft ingevoerd. Zo moeilijk kan het niet zijn. En nou stoppen met janken.
michael_ua (2023-08-25 18:48:52+00:00): Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140385101
eggie (2023-08-25 16:59:03+00:00): Feedback.. Tom.. Zo te zien is het nu correct .

MVG
eggie
michael_ua (2023-08-25 18:47:51+00:00): Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140385084
maciek-szn (2023-08-25 18:57:26+00:00): Nie ma czegoś takiego w tym miejscu, jak przystanek tramwajowy o nazwie „Aleja Wojska Polskiego”. Jest atrakcja turystyczna, imitacja przystanku, a nie coś, co formalnie jest przystankiem. Spróbuj tutaj postać i poczekać na tramwaj. Ciekawe, kiedy Ci się znudzi.
michael_ua (2023-08-25 18:46:54+00:00): reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140385045
eggie (2023-08-25 17:03:30+00:00): Wat leesvoer..

Volgens mij hoort dat in een relatie.. Ik heb er geen ervaring mee. Vraagje voor het forum. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:enforcement

MVG
eggie
MarcoR (2023-08-26 08:08:37+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto su OpenStreetMap!
Gli indirizzi andrebbero mappati come nodi nel punto in cui si trova la mattonella con il numero e non bisogna aggiungere un nome ma mapparli con le etichette "addr:street" e "addr:housenumber"; per maggiori info vedi qua: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Addresses#Come_inserire_gli_indirizzi_2

Buon mapping,
Marco
Jrachi (2023-08-26 09:28:30+00:00): Ciao.
Sei proprio sicuro di eliminare la relazione?
Alla SOSEC risulta eliminato, ma in casi come questo io tolgo dalla relazione il ref:REI ed rwn:name.
Mentre lascio osmc:symbol e ref se esiste qualche cartello o segno a vernice in zona.
Vedo però che si tratta di un percorso variante a chilometri dal principale.
Se non ricordo male mi sembra di avere segnalato la stranezza, ma come al solito non mi avvisano delle decisioni.
Dardy (2023-08-26 14:14:03+00:00): Ciao, l'ho eliminata perché non c'è alcun sentiero e men che meno nessuna segnaletica quindi in accordo con ipla il 601C non esisterà più. La zona è fin pericolosa perché molto scoscesa, in inverno la neve scarica tutta lì e in estate non vorrei trovarmi lì durante un temporale. Dovrebbe essere indicato un Rio a mio avviso, dato che ci sono anche delle strutture di contenimento in legno,anche se durante il rilevamento non c'era acqua.
Jrachi (2023-08-26 14:29:59+00:00): Grazie della spiegazione
Provvedo a cancellare anche su OSM2CAI (alias Infomont)

Ivo
Dardy (2023-08-26 16:01:39+00:00): Si procedi pure, il percorso dovrebbe essere già stato rimosso dal portale rilevatori e penso a breve sarà tolto anche dal catasto regionale.
kartler175 (2023-08-26 10:02:28+00:00): please check the outcome of your edits:
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-71.75521&lat=46.67880&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.95&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways
PierZen (2023-08-26 14:57:27+00:00): voir commentaires https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140391369
Edoardo Zanotti (2023-08-25 17:25:40+00:00): Ho dimenticato di aggiungere tra le fonti l'utilizzo di MapWithAI per la mappatura degli edifici.
Pipeton (2023-12-09 16:24:56+00:00): Hola, quería comentarte que si un elemento no tiene nombre, no se debe poner lo que es en name.
No es un nombre, es solo un descriptor, y esa tarea ya la hacen las etiquetas.
TrickyFoxy (2023-08-25 17:50:12+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140383405
MarcoR (2023-08-26 08:12:50+00:00): Anche qua, per l'edicola votiva è possibile usare l'etichetta historic=wayside_shrine (vedi qua: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Tag:historic%3Dwayside_shrine )

I nomi dovrebbero essere aggiunti solo quando sono nomi univoci e non la descrizione dell'oggetto. Se non sai come mappare qualcosa ti consigliere di chiedere alla comunità italiana attraverso uno dei canalai di contatto (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Contact) oppure di aprire note.

Buon mapping,
Marco.
Dawid2849 (2023-08-26 09:00:08+00:00): Ja chciałem zostawić primary do czasu otwarcia obwodnicy Łomży, ale jeśli uważasz, że tak jest lepiej, to niech tak zostanie
user_16178067 (2023-08-27 10:03:56+00:00): Degradacja do secondary i pozbawienie numeru może być, ale nadanie numeru DW645 jest chyba trochę przedwczesne. Rozumiem, że edytowałeś na podstawie tego artykułu(https://4lomza.pl/index.php?wiad=65833), a tam jest napisane, że "odcinek nie ma jeszcze numeru, ale roboczo określany jest jako 645". Czyli zmiana przedwczesna.
Yunkers (2023-08-27 11:55:40+00:00): Dostaliśmy od GDKKiA aktualną listę numerów i tego 645 tam jeszcze nie ma. Numer zapewne zostanie dodany w nowym roku, jak to zwykle bywa. So wycofania.
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/przebieg-drog-krajowych-uwagi-od-gddkia-bialystok/102946
Dawid2849 (2023-08-27 12:03:06+00:00): Zwykle wycofanie nie przyjedzie, bo edytowałem geometrię. Skasuje numer ręcznie, gdy wrócę do domu
Dawid2849 (2023-08-27 16:53:59+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140460575
TrickyFoxy (2023-08-25 17:50:13+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140383405
rskedgell (2023-08-25 17:42:25+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I'm not sure what you were hoping to achieve here, but I'll try to help if I can.

There's no need to add additional parks within a park which has already been mapped, as Plumstead Common is already mapped as a multipolygon relation:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/262748978

A park shouldn't normally be mapped as a node, but as an area. The documentation on the wiki is here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark
pio2_122 (2023-08-25 17:50:34+00:00): Właściwy opis tej zmiany to: Wprowadzenie nazwy, która nie istnieje od ponad dwóch lat.

Była ona stosownie skategoryzowana przed tą edycją (tag old_name).
Wskazówka: Uchwała nr XXIX/851/21 RM Szczecin.
Tomas Straupis (2023-08-27 17:30:34+00:00): Privažiavimai neturi pavadinimų.
TrickyFoxy (2023-08-25 17:49:40+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140383387
TrickyFoxy (2023-08-25 17:49:41+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140383387
Edoardo Zanotti (2023-08-25 17:37:51+00:00): Le modifiche riguardano Satriano di Lucania e non S. Pietro al Tanagro
eggie (2023-08-25 17:56:00+00:00): Dag Boralf,

Je vraagt feedback.. Lijkt me oke zo.
MVG
eggie
TrickyFoxy (2023-08-25 17:49:42+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140383387
TrickyFoxy (2023-08-25 17:51:01+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140383421
Filip009 (2023-08-28 11:56:32+00:00): Prečo ste zvoli "automat na pohonné hmoty" namiesto "čerpacej stanice"?
eggie (2023-08-25 20:02:43+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Szymson (2023-09-03 18:55:59+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11144480628

Duplikat węzła
michael_ua (2023-08-25 18:37:53+00:00): Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140384416
michael_ua (2023-08-25 18:39:20+00:00): Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140384836
Langlaeufer (2023-08-25 18:47:30+00:00): Hallo,
Danke für die Korrektur. grade1 hätte aber bleiben müssen.  Weiterhin frohes mappen und Grüße Langläufer
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140384289
HotterThanHell (2023-08-25 19:20:05+00:00): Ups, Danke fürs drüber schauen und korrigieren.
ika-chan! (2023-08-28 02:53:20+00:00): This changeset looks unusual from your most recent edits, because my Osmose dashboard is lighting up like a Christmas tree: what is the source for this autoroute?
Vinber (2023-08-30 07:35:56+00:00): Bonjour @mont1, tu n'as pas qualifié cette autoroute comme étant une future autoroute et effectivement, comme souligné ci dessus, il est difficile de trouver une source. 

Il y a du revert dans l'air, ton avis, retour stp ?
BigNotaire (2023-08-30 08:28:17+00:00): Bonjour, je me suis permis d'annuler ce changement pour plusieurs raison :

Premièrement, pour avoir été sur place pas plus tard qu'il y a dix jours, et  sur la section nord pendant une longue marche à pied en mai dernier, il n'y a aucun signe d'une quelconque autoroute sur le terrain, pas de panneau qui indiquerait un futur projet. Cet objet n'étant pas sur le terrain, il ne doit en principe pas être cartographié.

Deuxièmement, des recherches sur le web sont infructueuses, seul un article de 2003 parle vaguement d'une 2x2 voies qui connecterait Saint-Girons à l'A64. Le site internet du Conseil Départemental de l'Ariège ne mentionne récemment que des travaux de rénovation de la voirie sur la D117... sur sa section Saint-Girons - Foix.

Troisièmement, quand bien-même une voie rapide existerait entre Saint-Girons et l'A64, le way en l'état la fait passer à travers les maisons, prendre des angles à 90° (entre Mane et Salies-du-Salat par exemple)... c'est à dire que le changeset ne correspondrait de toute façon pas à l'existence d'une voie rapide.
trigpoint (2023-08-26 15:34:49+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM and thank you for your edits however I am concerned that the tagging of these paths may cause problems for some map users.

The name Craig Pennant Scramble implies that a walker may need to use their hands, which is not the general understanding of a path.

The wiki page at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=path?uselang=en suggests additional tags you can add, such as sac_scale to make the nature of the route clearer.

OSM has had concerns raised in the path where walkers following their smartphone app get into difficulties because it is not the walk along a clearly defined path they were expecting.

You may want to discuss this type of edit with the UK community who are very knowledgable, https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Cheers Phil
Nathaniel Hillman (2023-08-26 16:52:31+00:00): Hi Phil,

Thanks so much for your comment, I really appreciate experienced users checking what I've done. 

I was not aware of how to add those tags, myself - thanks for the pointers. I can probably add them to a large number of paths across Snowdonia if I find they are missing.

Regarding this specific case, I felt the need to add the name to label it as such as I wasn't aware of the tags. I recreated the path to improve upon one existing there before, but having recently taken this route I can confirm that no defined path exists for the lower (NE) part of this section at all, and it is a Grade 1 scramble. Scrambling is avoidable higher up. Should this lower section and the name therefore be removed?

Thanks,
Nathaniel
trigpoint (2023-08-26 18:40:20+00:00): Hi Nathaniel
Probably not removed but the tagging should be correct.

I am not sure of the tagging however you will get advice from the mailing list.

Cheers Phil
Nathaniel Hillman (2023-08-26 18:48:02+00:00): Hi Phil,

I've tagged it as an alpine hiking path as appears to be standard for grade 1s in the area and according to the wiki page you sent me, and added hiking difficulty tags to other major paths on the Nantlle ridge.

Thanks,
Nathaniel
philippec (2023-08-26 15:47:27+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8915843342
Vreemd
philippec (2023-08-26 15:55:43+00:00): Dat kan niet .
Ziet u niet waarom ?
Met Mapillary en een betere overzichtsfoto  zou het simpel zijn.
jozin-belgium (2025-07-10 20:32:39+00:00): Dit is 8 maanden geleden bewerkt en aangepast door gebruiker Eebie.