piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisRevert (2026-02-07 07:48:55+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178216956
(Cleaned up leftovers from previous edits)
NeisBot (2026-01-30 07:04:30+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13508953900 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Law office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-02-07 07:48:56+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/178182671
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-07 22:56:40+00:00): Removed SEO spam and cleaned up other tags for POI in changeset 183802367

https://osm.org/changeset/183802367
pitscheplatsch (2026-07-08 06:08:42+00:00): And again, we have some SEO spam ... see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185313988
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-08 06:44:43+00:00): And changeset 185313923 , SEO spam name=* and operator=*

SEO... SEO never changes. Fortunately, that makes them easy to deal with, and I have some ideas for making them even  easier ;)
pitscheplatsch (2026-07-08 06:48:15+00:00): Thanks, CAM.
NeisBot (2026-01-30 07:04:32+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13509273125 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Recruitment agency office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-07 07:48:57+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178216958
(Cleaned up leftovers from previous edits)
SomeoneElse (2026-02-01 12:29:11+00:00): Actually - I suspect it might have been rerouted.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2293737#map=17/55.647246/-4.813637 . I asked the person who added the new names in the earlier changeset.
NeisBot (2026-01-30 07:04:33+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13509299855 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Recruitment agency"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-07 07:48:59+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178216959
(Cleaned up leftovers from previous edits)
rempshaener (2026-01-29 18:23:39+00:00): Hallo,
eine Anmerkung zu deinen Bearbeitungen:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/384920034: Ich behaupte mal, dass „Gohr“ bei der Einfahrt in den Ort steht, nicht bei der Ausfahrt.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1472331987: Das Aufteilen derart kurzer Stücke ist aus guten Gründen eher unüblich. Dafür gibt es am way traffic_calming=island. In diesem Fall führt es zu Folgeproblemen: Über die Strecke läuft eine Landesstraßen-Sammelroute und rund 25 Busrouten. Die müsstest du jetzt alle durchgehen und einzeln fahrtrichtungsabhängig auftrennen.
www.openstreetmap.org/node/256510582: Da treffen sich keine Wege, also wäre es kein highway=crossing. Hier müssen dann zwei Übergänge erfasst werden.

Viele Grüße
rempshaener (2026-01-29 18:19:11+00:00): Hallo,
eine Anmerkungen zu deinen Bearbeitungen:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/857583770: Das parking_aisle setzt regelmäßig voraus, dass der Parkplatz, durch den parking_aisle führt, als parking=surface geführt wird. So richtig passt das jetzt nicht mehr zusammen.

Viele Grüße
Zrop (2026-01-31 16:29:17+00:00): Hallo Der Troisdorfer,
warum ändertst Du hier wieder massenweise "building=detached" in "building=yes" zurück ? Was war daran falsch ?

Gruß
Zrop
Der Troisdorfer (2026-02-02 09:10:17+00:00): Hallo Zrop,

ich bekomme aktuell keine Benachrichtigungen zu Changesetkommentaren über das OSM-Nachrichtensystem, deswegen hatte ich auch nicht reagiert.

Bitte schreibe mich bis auf weiteres direkt als PM an
Der Troisdorfer (2026-02-02 09:44:49+00:00): Das Problem ist gelöst, es war eine alte EMail in meinem Konto hinterlegt
MxxCon (2026-01-30 03:31:23+00:00): Hello.
What is that description tag?
As documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description, this must MUST NOT be used for any kind of promotional or marketing messaging. It must be a neutral tone description of a feature.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177845957
joeycast (2026-02-01 19:03:33+00:00): Owner-provided description. Has since been updated. Didn't feel as if it was promotional to me but I understand the nuances of the description tag now. Thanks for the documentation reference.
Brummelwuff (2026-01-29 13:54:17+00:00): Moin, du hast mit der Änderung mehrere Relationen unterbrochen.
Boomanux (2026-01-30 07:14:07+00:00): Sorry, sollte ich jetzt wieder angepasst haben
eggie (2026-01-29 13:56:37+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Tomek | Yanosik (2026-01-29 13:46:47+00:00): hej, przywrócono tutaj ruch dwukierunkowy?
savsk (2026-01-29 16:34:13+00:00): nie wydaje mi się jeszcze ale w razie czego jutro mogę sprawdzić dla pewności
adamos (2026-01-30 09:40:08+00:00): Hello, thank you for checking. I was repairing the broken bus relation , did not find any note about diversion on the ZTM pages. I will put back the one way, not to spoil the map
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-27 11:18:49+00:00): Cleaned up SEO spam and other mistagging for Lucid Private Offices POI in changeset 184690199

https://osm.org/changeset/184690199
arjunaraoc (2026-03-20 04:54:49+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Map should not consider shadows of buildings, only the top view.  Please check your edits and fix.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177846687
Xvtn (2026-02-01 00:52:59+00:00): Hi! I think this address format was actually OK as-is before. The convention here in Utah is housenumber containing just the number (412 in this case), then street containing the full name of the street. (North 200 East). This way has come to make sense to me, but let me know if you disagree - I'm always open to discussing challenging the status quo.
NeisBot (2026-01-30 07:04:34+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13509417582 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Window installation service"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-07 07:49:00+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178216960
(No visible changes after review)
NeisBot (2026-01-30 07:04:37+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/107415272 v5

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Malerbetrieb"
---
Zum Beispiel könnte eine neutralere und sachlichere Version deines Textes lauten: "Malerbetrieb"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-07 07:49:00+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178216962
(No visible changes after review)
MxxCon (2026-01-30 03:28:23+00:00): Hello.
Please note, as documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:website, urls must include http:// or https://
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177847430
DeKoerier (2026-01-29 13:21:50+00:00): Zie ook: https://www.ad.nl/rijswijk/doseersluis-bij-voor-fietsers-gevaarlijk-viaduct-zorgt-voor-files-en-frustratie-heeft-tijd-nodig~a91dbc7d/
eggie (2026-01-29 14:38:41+00:00): Dag DeKoerier,

Volgens het AD zou het een fietsstraat zijn
cyclestreet=yes, maar de weg staat op bicycle=no
Weet jij meer van de hoed en de rand?

„Deze fietsstraat is niet gemaakt voor een voortdurende stroom auto’s in beide richtingen”, aldus de gemeente.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-01-29 14:39:21+00:00): Waar begint de fietsstraat... Bij het viaduct?
DeKoerier (2026-01-29 14:42:13+00:00): De fietsstraat is momenteel alleen de Van Rijnweg tussen de Laan van Sion het Hoekpolderviaduct. Het stuk waar ik een bewerking heb gedaan is (nog) geen fietsstraat en er staat ook op de Van der Kooijweg een C15 bord.
DeKoerier (2026-01-29 14:43:33+00:00): Ik zal nog even een aanpassing maken dat deze weg moped:no is. Want ook dat is gewijzigd sinds de plaatsingen van de sluis.
DeKoerier (2026-01-29 14:44:53+00:00): Wijziging 177851423 toegepast daarvoor.
eggie (2026-01-29 14:45:02+00:00): Oke duidelijk.
Op het viaduct pakken fietsers zelfs het voetpad zie ik op de foto.. zo'n chaos is het daar.
Mapse,
eggie
DeKoerier (2026-01-29 14:47:17+00:00): Ja klopt. De doseersluis moet de sluiproute rustiger maken, maar dat is nog niet zo een groot succes. Omdat de weg nu geblokkeerd wordt door stilstaande auto's gebruiken de fietsers het voetpad. Tijdens de spitsmomenten complete chaos. Ik zeg permanent afsluiten... xD 

Fijne middag!
eggie (2026-01-29 14:31:46+00:00): Dag Menno. Ik heb het buurthuis samengevoegd met de adresnode. Wat bedoel je met winkel?
Sportcentrum omgezet naar buurthuis. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-01-29 14:00:30+00:00): Dag excude  Hier heb ik de adressen weer hersteld.
Nog een tip....  phone = begint met +31

MVG
eggie
excuse588 (2026-01-29 14:07:35+00:00): Ik zal je tips ter harte nemen. 

Betreft addressen hersteld snap ik het niet zo goed. De adressen zelf had ik niet verwijderd, toch? 

Alleen de restaurant features, die al meerdere jaren niet meer bestaan.

Vriendelijke groet!
eggie (2026-01-29 14:11:27+00:00): Op D4 Was een restaurant getagd. Maar dat adres bestaat dan toch nog steeds. De fastfood was los van het adres getagd. dat kon wel weg.
Dus enkelvoud Lees adres. 
Je edits https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177847638#22/53.07285/6.96010

Mapse,
eggie
excuse588 (2026-01-29 14:16:50+00:00): Juist, dan had ik dat voor D4 over het hoofd gezien. Zal ik scherper op zijn.

Bedankt!
NeisBot (2026-01-30 07:04:40+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13509444578 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Administración de propiedades"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-02-07 07:49:01+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/177878616
kamasytrix (2026-01-29 18:03:21+00:00): при нанесені будівель  використовуйте клавішу q, для вирівнювання кутів
MxxCon (2026-01-30 03:28:32+00:00): Hello.
Please note, as documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:website, urls must include http:// or https://
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177848008
joeycast (2026-02-01 19:03:57+00:00): Updated. Thanks for the correction.
no details provided here (2026-01-29 14:22:37+00:00): Hi - it's best practice to use the existing polygon (which contains historic data and building information) when splitting a terrace into smaller parts.  I have all the info to do this which I didn't have two years ago when I did the original work - see previous messages - and am happy to help.  Thanks.
trigpoint (2026-02-13 18:23:56+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/178516522
trigpoint (2026-02-13 18:23:51+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/178516522
eggie (2026-01-29 14:01:44+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Tip  Gebuik aalleen de adresnode. Niet dubbeltaggen op de gebouwomtrek.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-01-29 14:03:57+00:00): Het gebouw ligt nu uit het loods? Was dart de bedoeling
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=177848488
Ik zal het herstellen. 
Gr eggie
eggie (2026-01-29 14:17:28+00:00): Typ  Lag uit het lood. Ik heb het hersteld mbv een recente luchtfoto.
trigpoint (2026-02-13 18:23:45+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/178516522
rhhs (2026-01-29 18:58:18+00:00): Hi, thanks for your edits! Is the Minimart of this brand https://mini-mart.bg/ ?
Aleksandar26 (2026-01-29 20:13:00+00:00): Yes
rhhs (2026-01-29 20:20:01+00:00): Thanks, I added info so it's clear it belongs to the chain
jleedev (2026-02-01 04:59:57+00:00): Please see https://www.pa.gov/agencies/penndot/projects-near-you/district-11-projects/wexford-interchange-project

The ramp overpass is clearly visible on the ground. Bear in mind that this two-year project has only just begun and the geometry is entirely approximate.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177951193
rsitoni_Lyft (2026-02-04 04:24:29+00:00): Hi jleedev,
My name is Ravinder & I am a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. Many thanks for letting me know about the official data of the construction project & reverting the edits. To explain my changes: according to Lyft-owned street-level imagery (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1KRfLLpN2otsJLEDXUVcOULqJadwGcVuo/view?usp=sharing) from 20th January 2026, I didn’t see any closures, and Exit 73 appeared open to general traffic. Based on that, I adjusted the junction node to its actual location. The intention behind these edits was to improve traffic safety. 
I acknowledge that construction ways (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1467627714#map=17/40.613601/-80.095620&layers=P & https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1467627715) should not be removed from the database till the completion. I apologize for any inconvenience these edits may have caused & I’ll be more cautious with future changesets.

Happy Mapping!
Regards,
Ravinder
trigpoint (2026-02-13 18:23:30+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/178516522
SpinOff (2026-02-02 23:48:04+00:00): Hej. Musisz lepiej opisywać swoje zmiany. Tutaj jest wyjaśnienie dlaczego to konieczne: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
Herman Lee (2026-02-02 06:32:26+00:00): 本修改集已退回，详见：https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177992072
eggie (2026-01-29 14:27:51+00:00): Je voegt hier een drogist toe zonder naam?

MVG
eggie
trigpoint (2026-02-13 18:23:15+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/178516522
eggie (2026-01-29 14:27:02+00:00): Dag Menno  De info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode.

MVG
eggie
micheleOSM3 (2026-02-10 20:44:24+00:00): Mi dai una mano?
Questa relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18161249 risulta con una landuse come membro e credo sia errato, se con JOSM lo tolgo, alla fine risulta mancante un piccolo tratto di strada che non riesco a inserirlo come membro.
eggie (2026-01-29 14:20:01+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-01-29 14:21:12+00:00): Svp niet dubbel taggen. Alleen de adresnodes gebruiken. Ik pas weer even wat aan.
MVG
eggie
flex16 (2026-03-15 19:36:43+00:00): Hi,
du hattest diesen Weg mal mit smoothness=bad getagged:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23876320

Das kann auf jeden Fall sein, würde mich aber etwas wundern, denn das ist ja der ausgeschilderte Radweg Richtung Fulda.

Smoothness bad bedeutet, mit dem normalen City Bike praktisch nicht mehr befahrbar.

Vielleicht weist du zufällig wie die Oberflächenbeschaffenheit hier ist oder kannst du dir das nochmal auschauen?

smoothnes wird sehr stark berücksichtigt von Routern soweit ich weiß.

Bei Apple Street View hab ich da, zumindest bei einem Teil des Weges, viele lose Schottersteine gesehen. Dann könnte man ggf. auch surface=gravel wechseln.

Falls du da mal langfährst wäre natürlich eine Panoramax Aufnahme Klasse.

Laut Apple ist da auch noch ein VZ250 und Radwegweiser, die noch nicht eingetragen sind.

VG
flex16 (2026-03-15 19:40:20+00:00): Den Radwegweiser den ich gesehen habe bei Apple, könnte auch dieser gewesen sein: https://streetcomplete.app/p/331247.jpg

Scheinbar warst du ja kürzlich vor Ort.
flex16 (2026-03-15 19:48:55+00:00): Und ich meinte VZ260 statt 250...:P
m_fuhrmann (2026-03-17 08:06:37+00:00): Das ist ein normaler Feldweg, der immer mal geschottert und gerüttelt wird. Aber das nur alle paar Jahre.
Gravel und Fine Gravel passt hier gar nicht, wenn man sich an den Bildern orientiert.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:%C5%A0t%C4%9Brkov%C3%A1_cesta_u_Pl%C3%A1%C5%A1t%C3%ADku.jpg

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Fine_gravel_path_in_Voltino,_Zagreb.jpg

surface=compacted sieht schon eher nach Realität aus. Aber smoothness=bad ist in der Tat nicht so geil. Vlt smoothness=intermediate ? Denn das hier passt schon eher https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Smoothness_intermediate_unpaved.jpg

Ich finde manche Bilder im Wiki nicht gut tbh. Vlt sollte ich mal Bilder schießen und versuchen ein paar mehr Bsp da reinzuknallen.
flex16 (2026-03-17 08:14:56+00:00): Bei smoothness spielt halt ne Rolle, ob es es große/viele Schlaglöcher gibt oder groben Schotter. Man muss da vorallem auf das allgemeine Fahrgefühl achten, also auf Vibrationen/Erschütterungen. Smoothness ist aber ein eher subjektiver Wert, wo man auch etwas Erfahrung braucht um den einfach zu bestimmen. Bei ebenem compacted tagge ich aber eigentlich immer intermediate.
flex16 (2026-03-17 08:16:25+00:00): Die Kieselsteine können auch etwas kleiner sein als auf dem Bild. Abgrenzung gravel/compacted ist meiner Meinung nach, ob die Schotterscheine größten Teils festgefahren ist.
Herman Lee (2026-02-02 06:32:22+00:00): 本修改集已退回，详见：https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177992072
旧加卷 (2026-01-30 01:16:45+00:00): I don't think we have a model shop with 150k population here

changeset/177870801
frosm (2026-02-16 12:34:34+00:00): et celui-ci https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1093458495 ?
frosm (2026-02-16 12:35:04+00:00): et celui-ci aussi https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29338384 ?
Herman Lee (2026-02-02 06:32:17+00:00): 本修改集已退回，详见：https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177992072
Yog Sot (2026-01-29 22:15:32+00:00): obwód 20 metrów? ;]
Skąd dane o tym pomniku przyrody?
troszkę halucynacja jednak?
eggie (2026-01-29 15:14:31+00:00): Witamy w osm..
Welkom bij osm.
Svp commentaar in het Nederlands of Engels.
Mapse,
eggie
Magddalena (2026-01-29 15:21:28+00:00): sorry its my first time mapping :(
eggie (2026-01-29 15:31:32+00:00): Enjoy mapping! 😀
Magddalena (2026-01-29 15:33:23+00:00): Thankss :)
eggie (2026-01-29 16:01:25+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Dimitar155 (2026-01-30 07:24:27+00:00): Навсякъде телефона който сте записал е един и същ и започва с 02. Със сигурност в Габрово нямат стационарен телефон със софийски номер. Същото е видно и от сайта им - https://www.redcross.bg/contacts/contact2/gabrovo.

Какво означава emergency=no? В документацията (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:emergency) не се вижда да е дефинирано, за нещо различно от болници и пътища.

Уебсайта следва да започва с https://, а не с http://.
Anonymous36863 (2026-01-30 11:30:21+00:00): ok
Anonymous36863 (2026-01-30 12:09:37+00:00): emergency=no добавих заради https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/293183709
Anonymous36863 (2026-01-30 12:10:19+00:00): Но го премахнах
NeisRevert (2026-01-29 15:24:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/177853556
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
NeisRevert (2026-01-29 15:25:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/177853592
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
NeisRevert (2026-01-29 15:26:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/177853614
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
NeisBot (2026-01-30 07:04:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13395540950 v5

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Child care facility"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-07 07:49:01+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178216964
(No visible changes after review)
YomanNH (2026-02-02 21:08:51+00:00): Hej, jesteś pewny, że poprawna pisownia to "Z.O.O."?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/176300894
Cristoffs (2026-04-11 17:39:56+00:00): Równierz oznaczyłeś błednie kategorie dróg, tak się nie oznacza.
NeisBot (2026-01-30 07:04:46+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/375627077 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Ecolieu association"
---
Par exemple, une version plus neutre et factuelle de ton texte pourrait être : « association Ecolieu »
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam