piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2026-03-16 03:15:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 28 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1174308690 v3 | 7 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1174309945 v2 | 5 crossings
https://osm.org/way/95194037 v2 | 5 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/1104321068 v4

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179924580
iandees (2026-03-16 03:41:03+00:00): Hello! I noticed that nodes https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1104321045, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1104321068, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1104321131, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1638042773 were moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-16 06:37:33+00:00): @iandees Thanks for fixing the mentioned issue. Could you please include the changeset ID in your comment, for example like this: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179925100

This would link your edits back to this changeset here.

Furthermore most your mentioned nodes have not been edited/touched by your and this changeset.

Thanks.
FajrAl (2026-03-16 03:51:15+00:00): Harap suntingan perubahan dalam lingkup wilayah lokal.
f_husni (2026-03-16 03:59:13+00:00): halo, square changeset nya memang terlalu luas, tapi bisa anda lihat semua ways yg saya rubah memang berada di dalam provinsi aceh
FajrAl (2026-03-16 04:05:43+00:00): node/6645443820 berada di Kabupaten Tangerang.
NeisBot (2026-03-16 03:33:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 10 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/800802237 v4 | 6 crossings
https://osm.org/way/795666987 v6 | 4 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179924873
iandees (2026-03-16 03:40:59+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7399732621 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-16 06:34:24+00:00): @iandees Thanks for fixing the mentioned issue. Could you please include the changeset ID in your comment, for example like this: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179925101

This would link your edits back to this changeset here.

Furthermore your mentioned node has not been edited/touched by your and this changeset.

Thanks.
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-16 06:37:24+00:00): @iandees Thanks for fixing the mentioned issue. Could you please include the changeset ID in your comment, for example like this: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179925100

This would link your edits back to this changeset here.

Furthermore most your mentioned nodes have not been edited/touched by you.

Thanks.
iandees (2026-03-16 14:14:32+00:00): Thanks, pitscheplatsch. The code I'm running to detect these node drags also generates a template for me to use when commenting, and it was using the wrong node IDs. Thanks for letting me know. I fixed the system so it should be giving the correct IDs now.
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-16 14:51:10+00:00): Thanks for the reply @iandees

Best regards,
Pascal
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-16 06:34:59+00:00): @iandees Thanks for fixing the mentioned issue. Could you please include the changeset ID in your comment, for example like this: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179925101

This would link your edits back to this changeset here.

Furthermore your mentioned node has not been edited/touched by your and this changeset.

Thanks.
Wildsharky (2026-03-25 10:46:48+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:180043050
NeisBot (2026-03-16 04:16:21+00:00): Hi thriswallors, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 54 highway(s)
- 52 name(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179926076
thriswallors (2026-03-16 04:20:41+00:00): These deletions were intentional, based on ground survey from July 2025
Taya_S (2026-03-16 07:50:49+00:00): Thank you. From what I recall, there was an issue with someone adding tonnes of old WW2 data in this area. Remote areas like these sometimes don't get the attention (and quality control) they need, so weird stuff ends up getting added.
thriswallors (2026-03-16 16:10:06+00:00): Unfortunately there are many remaining trails that I suspect don't exist, as well as some buildings that certainly don't exist. However, I haven't verified on the ground, so I'm reluctant to remove them.
HellMap (2026-03-24 17:38:17+00:00): Šeit laukums ar sētu un līdz ar to sēta pievienota pie ceļa https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13651278954
Reinis Bērziņš (2026-03-24 18:46:21+00:00): Izlabots.
NeisBot (2026-03-16 04:28:06+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13651207482 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Tienda de moda"
---
Por ejemplo, una versión más neutral y objetiva de tu texto podría ser: "Tienda de moda"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
Oriam González Fundora (2026-03-16 05:06:49+00:00): Tienes, toda la razón, Ya está realizado el cambio!!. Gracias.
NeisBot (2026-03-16 04:40:04+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13651299636 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Labor office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-03-24 05:33:13+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/179927477
NeisBot (2026-03-16 04:51:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13651244524 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Labor service office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-03-24 05:33:16+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/179927451
Vmosnokia31 (2026-03-16 15:51:30+00:00): Bạn ơi, bạn ĐỪNG ghi "- Stories 3" nhé. Phải ghi vào phần Levels hoặc thêm tag building:levels. KHÔNG được đặt tên "Nha o", phải dùng tag building=house hoặc chọn House trong Feature Type. GHI CÓ DẤU, osm hỗ trợ Tiếng Việt nên đừng ghi không dấu. Chú ý lần sau👋
Vmosnokia31 (2026-03-16 15:55:07+00:00): Các tòa Singapore School bạn phải ghi là "Tòa 1", "Tòa 2" v.v. ĐỪNG ghi "Singapore school 2", tránh lặp lại với Khuôn viên trường/School ground.
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:10:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
GlobalScan (2026-03-16 09:24:37+00:00): Здравствуйте. На сколько мне известно, в Тюмени платный период в зонах платных парковок везде с 9:00 до 18:00 по будним дням (кроме круглосуточных). А у вас стоит тег fee=07:00-19:00

Ещё видел правки, где в таких случаях вешают два тэга: fee=no + fee:conditional=yes @ Mo-Fr 09:00-18:00
b-jazz (2026-03-17 16:43:36+00:00): Please make sure fairways and greens don't intersect/overlap. Same can be said for the various other golf areas as well (tees, bunkers, water hazards, etc)
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:10:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:11:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
nevw (2026-05-29 04:45:12+00:00): Hi, You appear to forgoten to add the outer polygon to the mp.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14329829#map=19/-6.135063/143.656094
NeisBot (2026-03-16 05:48:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 11 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/898489502 v12 | 4 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/2956021039 v4

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179928945
NeisReview (2026-03-24 11:33:13+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/180051437
Wildsharky (2026-03-25 10:47:48+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:180051674
one_electro_dan (2026-03-16 06:03:39+00:00): The comment should say "updated POI"
Rambling Banjo (2026-03-18 02:06:38+00:00): Please try to keep edits within a reasonable geographic area. It can make it difficult to decipher changelogs of local areas.
Wildsharky (2026-03-25 10:45:19+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:179997535
BAGgeraar (2026-06-22 15:10:26+00:00): Zie https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13651454304 Moet dit highway=street_lamp zijn?
pittrichimica (2026-06-23 16:25:36+00:00): Inderdaad. Gecorrigeerd, bedankt!
DaveF (2026-03-16 10:56:50+00:00): Please don't move paths when it's clearly the buildings which are inaccurately mapped.
Jebel_Hafeet (2026-03-17 04:36:53+00:00): Hi DaveF, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you
Jebel_Hafeet (2026-03-18 03:39:21+00:00): Hi DaveF, thank you for your feedback. I restored the alignment of the road and aligned the building footprints. I will take great care on alignment issues on my future edits.
Vmosnokia31 (2026-03-16 16:01:11+00:00): Bạn chưa biết tên thì đừng đặt là "Trường học 1", "Trường học 2" nhé
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 08:58:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:11:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
mottiger (2026-03-16 07:23:54+00:00): + source: local knowledge
eggie (2026-03-16 08:41:55+00:00): Dag Rutger,  Woonexpress XL gebruikt ook deze adresnode. Bestaat die winkel nog wel? 
MVG
eggie
rutgerkra (2026-03-16 09:06:16+00:00): Hi Eggie, als ik online kijk zie ik dat Woonexpress XL het adres Sijsjesbergweg 10a heeft.
eggie (2026-03-16 09:11:17+00:00): Ah.. dan woonexpress node ontdoen van de bedrijfsinfo en evt op de juiste adresnode bijtaggen.
Die adresnodes 26 kun je samenvoegen.
Editor id plakt automatisch
eggie (2026-03-16 08:40:41+00:00): Dag Rutger. Beter bijtaggen op de bestaande adresnode. Ik heb de info samengevoegd.

MVG
eggie
rutgerkra (2026-03-16 09:07:27+00:00): Ah super, dankjewel. Zal dit in de toekomst ook doen. Bedankt!
NeisBot (2026-03-16 07:27:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 15 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/408556575 v4 | 13 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179933394
NeisReview (2026-03-24 11:33:13+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/179984065
NeisBot (2026-03-16 07:36:39+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 24 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1422625288 v3 | 6 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1422625289 v2 | 5 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1489354817 v1 | 3 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179933856
NeisReview (2026-03-24 11:33:13+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/179972797
NeisBot (2026-03-16 07:48:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13651543322 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Storage facility"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-24 11:33:06+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180349149
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
Vmosnokia31 (2026-03-16 15:27:01+00:00): 👋Chào bạn, bạn phải ghi Số nhà ở vào phần Address, không ghi địa chỉ tòa vào Tên/Name. Số tầng phải ghi vào Levels, không ghi vào Name. Bạn không nên ghi không dấu.
eggie (2026-03-16 08:12:43+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback De naam van de school staat nog wel op het terrein. Klopt dat wel?
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-03-16 08:15:17+00:00): Dag Nozzit  Gebouwen alfa en beta overlappen elkaar nu. Klopt dat wel?

MVG
eggie
Nozzit (2026-03-16 09:06:01+00:00): Het zijn twee aparte gebouwen die met een loopbrug met elkaar verbonden zijn.
eggie (2026-03-16 09:09:17+00:00): Dat klopt. alleen nu stond de locatie over het hele terrein. Die toevoeging heb ik verwijderd.
eggie (2026-03-16 08:16:57+00:00): Dag Nozzit. Svp geen name=  gebruiken bij een beschrijving.
Ik pas het aan naar description. Dit is niet de naam van het veld.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-03-16 08:18:58+00:00): Alle begin is moeilijk. Voor kerdiensten gebruik je service_times

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:service_times
Dus niet openingstijden.
MVG
eggie
ajmat (2026-03-17 10:52:28+00:00): Reverted in changeset id: 179999020
eggie (2026-03-16 08:21:08+00:00): Dag Nozzit... Is dit wekelijk de naam van de kerk met daarin het adres opgenomen?

MVG
eggie
Nozzit (2026-03-16 09:09:55+00:00): Er zijn 2 kerken van hetzelfde kerkverband in Gouda daarom word er om te differentiëren altijd over de ggin aan de Gerbrandyweg gesproken.
eggie (2026-03-16 09:12:22+00:00): Oke.. duidelijk
eggie (2026-03-16 08:30:36+00:00): Bij kerkdiensten gebruiken we service_times.
Dat had ik net aangepast, maar je draait het zonder overleg weer terug?
MVG
eggie
Nozzit (2026-03-16 09:12:27+00:00): Sorry, ik kreeg net een stuk of acht mailtjes tegelijk met je reacties. Ik nam aan dat het om een bug ging of iets dergelijks. 
Bedankt voor de tip trouwens!

MVG nozzit
eggie (2026-03-16 09:14:58+00:00): No problem... In het begin is veel abacadabra. Dan zul je steeds de wiki moeten raadplegen.
eggie (2026-03-16 08:35:54+00:00): Hoi,
review_requested 	yes

Lijkt me allemaal ike.
MVG
eggie
rarad74 (2026-03-16 08:50:05+00:00): Salut. Te rog NU mai folosi imaginile bing. Au peste 12 ani vechime. Foloseste ESRI standard sau Mapbox.
Nu are rost sa desenezi aiurea campurile cultivate, deoarece perimetrele lor se vor modifica de la an la an si raman aiurea desenate pe harta.  O zi buna.
橘ヒカリ (2026-04-04 14:24:32+00:00): Waiting for further information, should not delete it directly.
SekeRob (2026-03-19 16:48:11+00:00): Hi,

Are you sure this is the residential area and not the administrative boundary of Monte Mignone as there is an awful lot of farmland included in the area.

Let us know as right now the tagging is flagged as incorrect to include a free standing label node cannot be part  of a multipolygon

cheers
RØSHØ (2026-03-23 12:59:19+00:00): Hi SekeRob, thanks for your feedback.
I still have some lack of knowledge in the "Relative" stuff and I am learning.

"Cinque Colline Laurentina" is an unofficial name for the neighbourhood that is in the relation that I highlighted. It can be actually found and recognized because there are road signes of beginning and ending of the neighbourhood.

I was wondering why its name wasn't showing on the map and I understood that a label was missing.
So I duplicated a label from another near neighbourhood (Colle dei Pini) and i placed it in the center of gravity of the area. Then I tried to do a relation, but apparently it didn't work.

Theoretically, it is not incorrect. Practically, probably yes. Let me know if I may help in some way
woodpeck (2026-03-18 11:19:29+00:00): Hallo Hanspeter Schmidt, bitte lies doch einmal https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments und versuche, künftig etwas bessere Changeset-Kommentare als nur "update" zu verwenden. Danke!
NeisBot (2026-03-16 08:54:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13651656822 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Erdbeerfeld"
---
Zum Beispiel könnte eine neutralere und faktischere Version deines Textes lauten: "Erdbeerfeld"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
Ebersried (2026-03-16 09:53:52+00:00): Vielen Dank für den Hinweis, ich werde das ändern!
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-16 14:48:46+00:00): 👍 Dankeschön
EneaSuper (2026-03-16 10:11:20+00:00): Ciao, per quanto riguarda il Quadrivium la scritta "QGEN01" è necessaria? Non sarebbe meglio metterla in official_name o simili?
sabas88 (2026-03-16 10:24:20+00:00): E' il nome del sito (ma non è ancora attivo) https://www.retelit.it/it/stampa/comunicati-stampa/2025/quadrivium-digital-e-retelit-si-alleano-per-l-apertura-di-un-pop-strategico-a-genova-rafforzando-la-connettivita-nel-mediterraneo
EneaSuper (2026-03-18 10:06:40+00:00): Capito, grazie del chiarimento 🙂
TrickyFoxy (2026-04-11 12:06:18+00:00): 👋 В правом меню редактора есть кнопка «Настройки фонового изображения». Выберите там спутниковые снимки ESRI — они свежее
Flynn Marquardt (2026-03-19 12:57:07+00:00): Hello,

why this new relation?

It seems a duplicate of https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/304751,
which already has a full border.

Please consider removing this duplicated relation.
Gaung Tebono (2026-05-11 15:55:18+00:00): Sorry, it seems I have made a small mistake regarding the boundary relations. Because in my opinion the relationship between the boundaries of Ngawi Regency is not optimal, so I was forced to maximize it by adding it. 🙏🏻🙏🏻
eggie (2026-03-16 09:07:38+00:00): Dag nozzit. Svp geen name gebruiken voor beschrijvingen. 
Gr eggie
MappingMore (2026-03-22 02:49:09+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:180232443
bxl-forever (2026-03-16 09:56:58+00:00): Please do not add municipalities or post codes on addresses.
We do not do this anymore in Belgium.
The entire country is already covered with areas to compute this data automatically.  OSM is and should remain a well-ordered database.
Your edit has been undone.
bxl-forever (2026-03-16 09:39:05+00:00): You have just added a floating node with name=7Days but without any other attribute.

What is it?  A shop?
bxl-forever (2026-03-16 13:44:15+00:00): OK, don’t bother, we have Mapillary picture of this area and it looks like a café.  We moved it to its correct location and added the door.
bxl-forever (2026-03-16 09:57:25+00:00): Duplicate information. Reverted.
MappingMore (2026-03-18 15:07:39+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:180064448
Goffredo (2026-03-16 12:42:41+00:00): Ciao.
Scusa ma perché rimuovere l'indirizzo dai POI delle attività? Così si perde l'associazione indirizzo ed attività.
Nulla vieta di avere il nodo con l'indirizzo sull'entrance o sul gate e l'indirizzo principale duplicato nei POIs delle attività
osm_fede (2026-03-18 10:00:59+00:00): Mi era stato detto che era errato attribuire numeri civici a edifici ed attività come avevo fatto in precedenza, quindi sto attribuendo numeri civici senza legarli alle attività. Quindi si possono in pratica fare duplicati dello stesso numero civico?