piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Ropino (2023-10-01 19:47:11+00:00): Danke fürs Anpassen.
---
Mir reicht für "construction" lt. Wiki: "...aktuell im Bau befindet oder deren Bau in Kürze beginnt."
Da muss nicht durchgehend Bautätigkeit auf Luftbilder (die ja auch selten ganz aktuell sind) zu sehen sein. 'In Kürze beginnt' ist für mich auch eine Ausschreibung/Auftragsvergabe mit zumindest groben Terminen.
VG Robert
chris66 (2023-10-02 05:39:55+00:00): Ok dann lass ich es erstmal so.
Gruesse
BCNorwich (2023-09-30 07:39:23+00:00): All of the fictional motorways are removed. Please only add genuine features, thanks.

Regards Bernard.
Frans S (2023-10-21 12:52:11+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please use the track 'path' rather than 'footway' 
Footway is to be used in urban areas as a dedicated footpath. 
Solve also the issues mentioned by the issue triangle before uploading your mappings.  Here, you just needed to connect highways to eachother.
jmsbert (2023-12-02 12:29:15+00:00): Hello ElifCvk,
thanks for contributing to this humanitarian project in Brazil. You have requested to get a feedback on your mapping - here it is:
You mapped building contures here and assigned the tag "building=house" or building="industrial". As I think you are not a local mapper who knows the locality very well, it is recommended to use the generic tag "building=yes" instead. This leaves the decision about the actual building-type to the local community.
Furthermore most buildings in reality have right angled corners - please remember to square them: In the editor just press "q"-key when the object is selected. Also in some of your changesets there were overlappings of building contures, please try to avoid this by zooming in and mapping precisely.
Keep on mapping and supporting OSM.
You can get a visualization of your changeset here: 
https://osmcha.org/changesets/141915744/
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141915744
rayth (2024-05-21 17:21:01+00:00): Please don't name the feature by it's description

Like naming a Surau as "Surau"
Реdактор (2023-09-30 11:20:46+00:00): Вы тот смельчак который ходил на Амуко?  :)
Vlados143948 (2023-09-30 12:43:00+00:00): Да, я ходил)
Я сейчас после каждого похода, всё в карту заношу, делаю её лучше!)
Реdактор (2023-09-30 12:47:27+00:00): Понятно, я ходил в конце июля этого года, никогда не забуду хребет Отважных  и медведя которого мы там встретили :/
Реdактор (2023-09-30 12:52:33+00:00): И мы ещё нашли с напарником чей-то рюкзак и порванную одежду на том же хребете отважных
Vlados143948 (2023-09-30 12:54:16+00:00): Согласен, забытое богом место..
А такой вопрос о карте, обрывы обозначены плохо, тоненькая линия, её на карте не видно почти, но прорисовка у меня 2 движок стоит, вы можете там это исправить? Или этим не вы занимаетесь?
Vlados143948 (2023-09-30 12:56:07+00:00): Да, рюкзак тоже видел, сначала его с собой взял,но потом там же оставил, на обратный путь сил небыло,  а еще его нести...
Реdактор (2023-09-30 15:44:42+00:00): Ой насчёт обрывов незнаю,  я не могу это исправить к сожалению
pitscheplatsch (2023-10-15 11:45:32+00:00): reverted
pitscheplatsch (2023-10-15 11:45:23+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141945692
bxl-forever (2023-09-29 15:04:19+00:00): Hello,

With respect, having a road with "service=parking_aisle" outside a parking area is incorrect.

I suggest you either draw an amenity=parking area here—probably with access=private, I guess they use it only to store new cars—or find a more suitable tag if the intention is to render them is smaller print.
cimm (2023-10-02 09:19:58+00:00): Ah, I didn't know that! Thanks for pointing it out.
DaveF (2023-11-23 14:46:19+00:00): Hi
To double check, is this WHSmith a retail outlet?
Should it be more rectangular in shape?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/358388644
MxxCon (2023-09-30 00:43:38+00:00): Hello.
Yes, this edit is in New York. But writing that doesn't help others understand what you are changing. Please do write meaningful changeset comments.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141916777
DD1GJ (2023-09-29 15:38:09+00:00): Hallo Nahwärme Eichede, mit diesem "Test" wurde ein Teil des Rohdatenbestandes gelöscht. Daher habe ich alles wieder rückgängig gemacht.

Falls für Planungszwecke Kartenansichten benötigt werden: https://umap.openstreetmap.de/
silversurfer83 (2023-09-29 22:10:42+00:00): Gude :)

Sicher, dass das hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1211841964 ein Feldweg ist? Luftbild gibt eher einen Trampelpfad her, oder?

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141916891
gendy54 (2023-12-31 14:15:44+00:00): Bonjour,

Ce bâtiment n'est plus une caserne de pompiers. https://actu.fr/normandie/le-mont-saint-michel_50353/mont-saint-michel-la-caserne-des-pompiers-transformee-en-restaurant_45232759.html
L'avez-vous constaté sur place ?
gendy54 (2023-12-31 14:21:50+00:00): Bonjour,

Je suis dubitatif sur l'emplacement de la caserne ici sachant qu'il y a dejà des pompiers sur le mont et que je n'ai pas d'info sur un éventuel déménagement. L'avez-vous constaté sur place.
merci d'avance.
Vinber-Pro (2024-05-20 16:14:02+00:00): salut, je pense que ce contributeur ne répond pas et fait parfois des maladresses ... la transformation d'une statue en arbre, ton doute ici, ...

à plus
gendy54 (2024-05-23 00:18:19+00:00): merci. J'ai supprimé.
mueschel (2023-09-30 08:52:39+00:00): Welcome to OSM!

You added many tags here that are not used in any other place and don't match common tagging practices, e.g.:
Bathroom = yes
Braille Information Board = no
Child-Friendly Toilet = yes
Directional Signage = yes
Janitor's Room = yes
Napkin Disposal Machine = yes
Sanitary Napkin Dispensing Machine = yes
Tactile Pathways = no
Third Gender Toilet = yes
User-Friendly Payment Option = yes

Please use only tags that are described in the OSM Wiki or are available in the presets of your editor.
This is necessary to make sure that every other user can understand the data.
philippec (2023-10-01 05:13:04+00:00): Dat is weliswaar geen portretfoto, maar brengt toch niet veel bij.
Taya_S (2023-09-29 16:05:58+00:00): I assume you're already aware, but just in case. This vandalism has happened all over the country again, not just here.
user_17222985 (2023-10-08 09:44:44+00:00): I believe that the delete of name ru will take place as long as the war lasts. A large number of members of the Ukrainian Openstreetmap community hate the Russian language with all their hearts. Personally, I am positive about the removal of name ru. I plan to drink a glass of alcohol for the health of those who do it
MxxCon (2023-10-10 19:39:00+00:00): You could use EveryDoor app. It's specifically intended for working with POIs.
👋😉
jmsbert (2023-12-01 20:18:49+00:00): Hello Chaitanya Shetty,
thanks for contributing to this project in Brasil. You assigned "building=house" to most of the buildings you added here. Unlike having local knowledge ( I think you are remote mapping) - e.g. inhabitent of the region / city, it is recommended to assign the simple and more generic "building=yes". Decision about the actual building-type can then be left to check by the local community.
Keep on mapping and supporting OSM.
andrewth1 (2024-04-06 20:05:30+00:00): This had already been mapped properly as a retail area with several detached buildings prior to your changeset. There is no indoor mall here. I removed it.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-02 13:17:07+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/732047958/history has access:bus that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
Would using bus access tag (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bus ) be fitting at least equally well?
meteorquake (2025-12-16 19:14:59+00:00): Hello @ukrainian_tourist !
Can I ask you about this route you added -
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1211894393#map=15/36.85049/30.48929
On the satellite view it looks like it's going up a cliff :) but perhaps you could say if it's definitely accurate (presumably it is) and what's actually there as the hardest features (if it's readily walkable I might go by there some time myself too).
Luzandro (2025-08-01 04:48:14+00:00): Hallo,

alte Konskriptionsnummer und neue Orientierungsnummer sollten nicht in einem Objekt kombiniert werden. Erstere bezieht sich üblicherweise auf den Ort (den du ganz entfernt hast), aber nicht zwingend (manchmal werden auch nur Straßennamen eingeführt, aber die Konskriptionsnummern behalten). Wenn du jetzt nach Mühlenstraße 83 suchst, erhältst du als Ergebnis das Gebäude Mühlenstraße 42
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141920176
emergency99 (2025-08-01 10:24:55+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. 
Den Place hab ich wieder hinzugefügt (das der beim mergen verloren ging fiel mir damals nicht auf).
Da diese Nummern sich in der Realität am selben Haus befinden und sich darauf beziehen, ist die Abbildung in der DB nur so richtig. Und wenn die Adresssuche (wie so oft) suboptimal ist, sollte es (zumindest jetzt wo ich den Place-Tag wieder hinzugefügt habe) kein Datenproblem sein. Hoffe das passt jetzt.
Luzandro (2025-08-01 10:42:27+00:00): wie gesagt kann es gültig sein, dass addr:conscriptionnumber in Kombination mit addr:street verwendet wird, während addr:place und addr:street nicht gleichzeitig verwendet werden sollen, daher handelt es sich durchaus um ein Datenproblem.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:*

Wenn du es unbedingt am gleichen Objekt haben willst, kannst du, wie auch schon bei "addr2:postcode=3051", dieses addrN-Schema verwenden, aber das ist halt nicht mehr als strukturierte notes, die nirgends ausgewertet werden
DD1GJ (2023-09-29 23:36:03+00:00): Hallo Nniki369, danke für die Anpassung der Kreuzung. Ich habe noch Geometriefehler korrigiert und das gelöschte Wegkreuz wieder hergestellt und dies auf den neu angelegten Platz verschoben. Ist das so korrekt? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/464604246

Allerdings scheint mir die Platzgestaltung etwas zu groß für ein normales Wegkreuz. Könnte das evtl ein Kriegerdenkmal sein? Gibt es im Ort irgendwo einen Briefkasten?

Viele Grüße, Joachim
nklqs (2023-10-01 08:18:03+00:00): Hallo Joachim,
vielen Dank für die Korrektur von dem Geometriefehler. Es ist mir auch aufgefallen, jedoch bin ich noch recht ungeübt darin... Ja, an der von dir markierten Stelle befindet sich ein Kriegerdenkmal. Ich werde auch den fehlenden Briefkasten an der richtigen Stelle hinzufügen. 
Viele Grüße
Niklas
DD1GJ (2023-09-29 16:29:48+00:00): Nochmals in aller Deutlichkeit: Mit diesen "Tests" zerstörst Du die Daten, aus denen die Karte erstellt wird!
pitscheplatsch (2023-10-01 17:31:58+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141921449
MxxCon (2023-09-30 00:46:26+00:00): Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you tag these intersections as uncontrolled when you can clearly see traffic lights on the satellite imagery?
Also, if crosswalks are straight, please try to draw them straight as well.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141921506
bxl-forever (2023-09-29 19:00:06+00:00): Hello,

Thanks for spotting the change.
Next time, please start from the existing restaurant and change the name and details.  Do not create a new restaurant next to it because it creates a misleading map, where it looks like there are two competing restaurants in the same building.

I fixed it.
Santi2222 (2023-10-03 15:05:26+00:00): Hola:
He revertido parcialmente este conjunto de cambios (sólo en Vitoria, que es la zona que conozco y suelo editar). He visto [ES:Buenas_prácticas_en_España#Name_con_abreviaturas esto sobre el tema en OSMwiki] (reconozco que no lo conocía de antes), pero no me parece lo más adecuado hacer cambios así de sistemáticos sin discutirlos antes; ya que existe un etiquetado uniforme en la zona (aunque no sea conforme a lo expuesto en el enlace anterior). Por otra parte tendría que verse cómo tratar los nombres bilingües (si como "[tipo de centro es] X [tipo de centro eu]", "[tipo de centro es] X/X [tipo de centro eu]" o de alguna otra manera), así como el uso de mayúsculas en euskera.

En última instancia tal vez habría que evaluar la idoneidad de esa directriz en el caso de nombres bilingües, ya que aplicarla a rajatabla resultaría en nombres como "Centro Privado de Educación Infantil, Primaria y Secundaria Padre Raimundo Olabide Haur, Lehen eta Bigarren Hezkuntzako Ikastetxe Pribatua", aunque ese es otro tema que en todo caso tendría que tratarse en la lista de correo.
Saludos
Hugoren Martinako (2023-10-03 20:28:55+00:00): Buenas,

Justo esta semana se ha estado comentando en el foro: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/el-uso-de-las-siglas-ies-ceip-y-otras-delante-de-los-nombre-propios-de-los-centros-educativos/104200 y por eso he procedido a estandarizarlo. Te invito a que compartas tu opinión con el ejemplo de euskadi.

Me hace gracia el ejemplo que me has puesto ya que es exactamente igual al que yo mismo hice en el telegram de la comunidad: https://t.me/OSMes/147362 y sí, lo veo como un desmadre el poner nombres tan tremendamente largos, especialmente en zonas bilingües, pero también es cierto que (existiendo short_name) el pasar de nombre-largo a nombre-corto es directo, sin embargo el paso opuesto es muy difícil. Quizá una opción pase por utilizar official_name (o similar). En Navarra, por ejemplo, he utilizado la zona de predominio lingüístico para usar ambos nombres o sólo uno.

También hay que tener en cuenta el mapeo para el render, y puesto que OSM es una base de datos, esa es una de las razones de usar el nombre completo, por largo que sea. Sin embargo, lo que vemos en esta web es CartoCSS, un render más (a pesar de ser el principal), el cual no utiliza short_name en estos casos y genera muchas guerras de edición con este tema.

Lo dicho, comparte tu punto de vista en el foro o telegram para intentar llegar a un acuerdo general que pueda llevarse a la wikipedia.

Agur bat
Santi2222 (2023-10-05 20:31:13+00:00): Hola:
Gracias por enlazarme al foro, no lo conocía (en general suelo andar bastante desconectado de las discusiones de la comunidad), cuando tenga tiempo escribiré explicando un poco más lo que he comentado aquí. Creo que una buena solución podría ser utilizar el nombre que utilice el centro, ya que hay algunos acrónimos que fuera de documentos oficiales no se usan en ninguna parte (y los términos sin abreviar aún menos). Al fin y al cabo una de las primeras "buenas prácticas" listadas por la wiki es mapear la realidad que hay sobre el terreno, no en otros mapas ni documentos oficiales. El ejemplo de antes sería name=Olabide ikastola; en short_name, official_name y demás se podrían poner nombres oficiales y acrónimos. Pero bueno, ya desarrollaré más en el hilo enlazado porque creo que es algo que merece la pena tratar más en general.
Saludos
puchaczowsky (2023-09-29 16:56:40+00:00): przerzucenie primary na DW369 w Lubawce to nie był raczej dobry pomysł, widzałeś parametry tej drogi + ograniczenia?
Rodrigo Rega (2023-10-01 16:18:25+00:00): Hello. I have local knowledge of this area and the 3 POI that you added are not real. Could you detail why did you added them?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141923060
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-10-01 09:06:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 141978430 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a number of mass removals of Armenian names.  See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/edit-warring-over-nagorno-karabakh-region-republic/57413/25 and please discuss there.
jeslop (2023-11-06 16:49:05+00:00): Changeset reverted due to fictional mapping

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143701880
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-10-01 09:06:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 141978430 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a number of mass removals of Armenian names.  See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/edit-warring-over-nagorno-karabakh-region-republic/57413/25 and please discuss there.
MxxCon (2023-09-30 01:00:08+00:00): Hello.
Once again I ask you to properly connect crosswalks with their intersecting roads and to accurately tag whether it's a traffic signal or STOP sign controlled crosswalks.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141923500
eggie (2023-09-29 19:14:56+00:00): Dag Gusted... Volgens mij zit je zo'n beetje gevangen in dit deel van A foort.
Ook de uitzonderingen voor tweewielers ontbreken. 
Hoe kom je van dit eiland af?
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=141923785

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-09-29 19:23:29+00:00): Het kan nooit kloppen wat je hebt gedaan.
De bebording is ook niet heel duidelijk hier, maar ik heb je actie even teruggedraaid. Nu routeert het weer naar behoren. 

De afslagbeperking is nodig om het verkeer na de brug naar links te dwingen. 
De andere straten zijn geen eenrichting, maar door de beperking wordt het wel de goede kant uitgestuurd.
Je had de weg naar de brug Harlingerstraat ook op oneway - yes gezet.  Dat klopt ook niet.


MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-09-29 19:24:50+00:00): reverted by Wijzigingenset #141927316
Kijk nog eens waar borden eenrichtingverkeer zijn bijgekomen.. als ze er al zijn. 

MVG
eggie
MxxCon (2023-09-30 01:22:40+00:00): Hello.
When mapping features please pay attention that they are accurate. In this edit you mapped sidewalks that cross over a railroad ditch, but you didn't tag appropriate areas as bridge. In one part sidewalks stop completely and don't cross the ditch.
And once again you did not connect crosswalks to the intersecting roads.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141923866
MxxCon (2023-09-30 01:23:42+00:00): Here once again you did not connect crosswalks to the intersecting roads and you mapped a sidewalk that does not cross over a railroad ditch.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141923944
felipeeugenio (2023-09-29 22:05:24+00:00): Hola. Tu eres JS Brand en el chat?
Supaplex (2023-09-29 17:57:32+00:00): 修正國立嘉義高商
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141924549
MxxCon (2023-09-30 01:27:30+00:00): Hello.
Why did you map this as a building as building when satellite imagery clearly shows this is a handball court in a park?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141924556
mikini (2023-10-01 17:54:37+00:00): Hej,

Var det med overlæg at du fjernede addr:place=Sandvig i dette changeset?

Botten autoAWS har genindført det i [changeset 141995659][1] da det er opført som [supplerende bynavn  i Danmarks Adresser (DAR) på adressen Sænevej 5C][2], hviket [autoAWS mapper til addr:place i OSM][3] .

Hvis dette ikke er korrekt skal du som udgangspunkt have fat i kommunen der kan redigere DAR.

-- 
Mikkel

[1]: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141995659
[2]: https://api.dataforsyningen.dk/adgangsadresser?q=s%C3%A6nevej%205c
[3]: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/AutoAWS#Updating_addresses
Lostmonkey (2023-10-01 18:21:20+00:00): Nej, det var ikke meningen at slette en adresse. Må være sket ved en fejl da jeg fjernede en campingplads (primitiv teltlejr) og oprettede det nye shelter, som er blevet bygget der i stedet.
mikini (2023-10-01 18:59:24+00:00): Ok, det er helt i orden. Adressen bliver opdateret automatiskt af autoAWS, men ville bare gøre opmærksom på at hvis der er data i DAR der ikke er korrekt bør det rettes heri.

Jeg kan også se at alle adressenoder i området har dette tag, selv helt ind i noget af Allinge-Sandvig, men der er vist ikke (længere?) en by der decideret hedder Sandvig, kun [et kvarter i Allinge-Sandvig][1].

Jeg lægger mærke til det fordi jeg følger slavisk i hælene på autoAWS i øjeblikket, for at se om den gør hvad den skal, da den er flyttet til en ny server.

Jeg [har rettet][3] det andet shelter så det også er basic_hut, givet dem begge navnet fra udinaturen.dk, samt tilføjet [en kanobådrampe][2] på stranden som omtalt på udinaturen. Hvis du kender stedet må du da gerne lige tjekker om det ser fornuftigt ud, tak.

-- 
God mapning,
Mikkel 

[1]: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9480574410
[2]: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:canoe%3Dput_in
[3]: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142000953
Lostmonkey (2023-10-01 19:36:30+00:00): Jeg var der forleden. De to sheltre er stort set identiske. Der er åbninger i begge gavle. På det nordligste shelter er der dog kun dør i den ene åbning. Så vidt jeg husker af et opslag i hytten, var årsagen til dette noget med byggetilladelsen, hvor det uden en permanent åbning ville tælle som en hytte. Det nyere nabo-shelter havde dog døre i begge åbninger, så måske de har fået byggetilladelsen ændret siden opførslen af det første. Skal man være helt nøjeregnende kan det nordlige shelter (med åbning i den ene gavl) vel derfor kaldes for et "lean-to", men synes også det giver god mening blot at kalde begge for basic-hut.
Så ikke nogen egentlig bådrampe, omend stranden er lavvandet og velegnet til at trække en kano op.
Marek-M (2023-09-30 20:48:10+00:00): Cześć, tutaj https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11227844938 trochę niepoprawnie oznaczyłeś jezioro jako emergency=water_tank. Zgodnie z wiki nie jest to zbiornik naturalny https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:emergency=water%20tank - ewentualnie mógłby to być staw przeciwpożarowy https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:emergency%3Dfire_water_pond ale to jest jednak jezioro a nie staw. Wg mnie bardziej poprawnie jest oznaczyć miejsce poboru wody emergency=suction_point https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:emergency%3Dsuction_point w pobliżu miejsca, gdzie wóz strażacki może ją pobierać.
Osp Mierzeszyn (2023-09-30 21:01:58+00:00): Tak zgadza się musiała nastąpić pomyłka z mojej strony. Dziękuję za poprawę. 

Zauważyłem że strona posiada też problem z odświeżanie GPS podczas dodawania hydrantow miałem problem ze GPS stał w miejscu i nie chciał odświeżyć lokalizacji co znacznie wydłuża i utrudnia proces ewidencji hydrantów/zbiorników. Pozdrawiam Osp Mierzeszyn
Thibaultmol (2023-09-29 19:13:16+00:00): stumbled across this changeset, I don't think there's a building there?
MxxCon (2023-09-30 01:26:32+00:00): There's no building here. This editor just blindly accepts everything that's prompted to them.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141924749
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-10-01 09:06:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 141978430 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a number of mass removals of Armenian names.  See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/edit-warring-over-nagorno-karabakh-region-republic/57413/25 and please discuss there.
pitscheplatsch (2023-10-01 17:31:35+00:00): Just a test?

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
Enock4seth (2023-09-30 00:45:03+00:00): Have you seen my previous comments? Please stop adding one building per changeset and using Esri World Imagery which is very old! use Bing Imagery.
MxxCon (2023-09-30 01:29:45+00:00): Hello.
You are NOT supposed to just blindly accept every single thing that AI shows you. They are supposed to be as helpful guides! You MUST still use human judgement if a give feature should be a building or not and you MUST adjust them as necessary to accurately match satellite imagery.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141925121
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-10-01 09:06:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 141978430 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a number of mass removals of Armenian names.  See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/edit-warring-over-nagorno-karabakh-region-republic/57413/25 and please discuss there.