piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Glassman (2025-11-17 00:11:39+00:00): Can you please stop and take some time to explain what you are doing in each edit? "corrections" is very helpful, especially when you are modifying boundaries. Please leave a changeset comment for each edit and in the future, please leave a good changeset comment. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments for help in writing changeset comments. thanks and welcome to OSM
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174750254
ChrissW-R1 (2025-11-17 00:32:20+00:00): Yes, please describe what you want to correct with this. So we need to revert your changesets to fix country boundaries and other things.
ChrissW-R1 (2025-11-17 00:58:24+00:00): Reverted in changesets https://osm.org/changeset/174747883 and https://osm.org/changeset/174750514 to fix boundaries and other relations.
ChrissW-R1 (2025-11-17 01:46:05+00:00): I contacted the new user. It looks like some border issues of Kuwait.
I referred the user to the DWG for further clarification and to prevent an edit war.
b-jazz (2025-11-18 03:19:22+00:00): Heads up jdoedeere, golf=hole lines need to start at the tee and end in the green. I noticed a few of yours were pointed the other way around today. I'm cleaning them up as I find them but thought you should know for future edits. Thanks.
Glassman (2025-11-18 03:35:37+00:00): ALPR devices aren''t typically in the middle of the road. Look for the shadow of the pole to find the base location.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174750706
synthfi (2025-11-19 06:42:13+00:00): also modified some lifts over in europe. Same source?
Udarian (2025-11-17 01:11:21+00:00): according to Wikipedia its a city https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homestead,_Florida
NeisBot (2025-11-17 00:53:34+00:00): Hi retrograde, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 98% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 148 highway(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=174751198
MassCartog (2025-11-17 14:44:43+00:00): Hello retrograde in this changeset you have removed many many validly mapped features. Note that driveways are valid features to be included in OSM. Please don't remove them.

Also please use the changeset comment to describe what you are doing, this is not a "Minor edit" and that tells people nothing. OSM is a community project, please follow community guidelines.

This changeset is damaging valid OSM data and has been reverted.
retrograde (2025-11-17 16:06:45+00:00): Hey, thanks for pointing that out. I deleted those driveways because I thought they were unnecessary clutter, but I didn’t realize OSM aims for that level of detail. Totally my mistake and I’ll stick to the guidelines and make sure to add proper comments next time.
Udarian (2025-11-17 01:13:27+00:00): according to Wikipedia and their own website Hialeah is a city. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hialeah%2C_Florida 
https://www.hialeahfl.gov/
Udarian (2025-11-17 01:15:25+00:00): according to Wikipedia and its website Pembroke Pines is a city https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pembroke_Pines%2C_Florida
https://ppines.com/
Rhubarb (2025-11-17 01:58:20+00:00): Hi sizzlaaaa,

Just a little nit-pick:-
Have a read up on the OSM Australian Tagging Guidelines wiki here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines

--> For addresses, you only need a minimum of a unit number (if applicable) / house number / street name. You can optionally add a suburb / post code / state / country.
Note that state should be "VIC" rather than "Victoria".
- I made this mistake myself 2 years ago too.

Also want to say thanks for updating the map, especially around new housing estates. - It can make a big difference for people living there to get deliveries etc.

Also if you need any assistance, let me know.

Nice work :)
Rhubarb.
MxxCon (2025-11-19 04:03:43+00:00): Hello.
In this edit you attached this camera to a crosswalk path. Semantically this doesn't seem correct.. I highly doubt that a camera is part of the crosswalk itself.
Please disconnect these 2 features.
MxxCon (2025-11-19 04:04:02+00:00): Hello.
In this edit you attached this camera to a crosswalk path. Semantically this doesn't seem correct.. I highly doubt that a camera is part of the crosswalk itself.
Please disconnect these 2 features.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174751420
MxxCon (2025-11-19 04:04:18+00:00): Hello.
In this edit you attached this camera to a crosswalk path. Semantically this doesn't seem correct.. I highly doubt that a camera is part of the crosswalk itself.
Please disconnect these 2 features.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174751420
1538615423865283 (2025-11-19 04:10:24+00:00): Just fixed it, the cameras are mounted to a traffic light mast arm, that's why they are showing on the road. I mistakenly added them to the crosswalk.
MxxCon (2025-11-19 04:17:31+00:00): My apologies about duplicate messages. It looked like they originally didn't send.

You could separately map that pole and gantry and then attach cameras to that gantry. But if that's too much for now, that's alright too. 😅
1538615423865283 (2025-11-19 04:24:01+00:00): No worries, and thanks for the tip, I am new to this. I will work on it!
1538615423865283 (2025-11-19 04:33:01+00:00): Just added a gantry, please let me know if anything is incorrect. Thanks again for the help!
MxxCon (2025-11-19 04:04:34+00:00): Hello.
This edit has the same issue as the previous one. Please disconnect camera from crosswalk
Herwescheluc (2026-01-17 21:06:34+00:00): Hallo, akino_germany,

nur zur Info: War heute in LA und habe Deine Fixme geprüft und abgearbeitet, ALKIS stimmt! Findest Du in diesem CS (https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=177345718) unter ferner liefen...

Grüße

Andreas
akino_germany (2026-01-19 15:03:25+00:00): Hallo Andreas,

vielen Dank, dass du dir die Zeit genommen hast. 

Gruß
Akino
Comino (2025-11-17 09:06:56+00:00): Hi,

The tag amenity=training is outdated/obsolete.
Source: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Education_features

I have reverted it to the education=school tag accordingly.

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
https://btcmap.org/tagger/6794624
MassCartog (2025-11-17 02:01:36+00:00): Hello, personals names you or your family use is not a valid use of the name tag in OSM. The name tag feature is for widely known names.

Right now, you are using the name tag as a personal description or label, this is incorrect and there is no way to verify this information. I should not be included in the OSM database.

Please do not keep replacing it.  You have now warned by multiple users. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names

Also, if you are reading this, please also stop adding other non-existing features around the world.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Vandalism
Fizzie-DWG (2025-11-17 02:39:47+00:00): Maybe you do call your Grandma's property "Bentley's Plateau", but the patch of dead grass in the middle of the yard where the trampoline used to sit is NOT a patch of scrub! Now deleted.
Graeme Fitzpatrick         						
Moderator     		
OSMF Data Working Group
Fizzie-DWG (2025-11-17 02:43:44+00:00): Please also see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18968
AnnaCatarina (2026-04-07 19:32:25+00:00): Hello Argon,
where do You get the info from about the gauge of 184 mm for the Tren escénico?
If I take a look on the videos, it is more like 550 or 600 mm.
Thanks for clearing the source.
With regards,
Anna Catarina
Argon181 (2026-04-08 19:56:43+00:00): Hello Anna, Indeed you are right, is probably a typo from my side, ill correct. I live nearby and did check the rails, despite being abandoned it was inding 550mm
AnnaCatarina (2026-04-12 12:02:04+00:00): Hello Argon,
as You can find here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C._P._Huntington , the gauge is 610 mm.
With regards,
Anna Catarina
MassCartog (2025-11-17 02:11:37+00:00): User created this sockpuppet account for Vandalism

Main account: ID: 23097052
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/LandenWaverlyMapper 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Vandalism
Fizzie-DWG (2025-11-17 02:22:33+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18967
3D打印 (2025-11-19 01:40:22+00:00): sorry，误操作误操作，之前动边界时划到此地，查看边界时可能是不小心点击误触改变了边境
george1201 (2026-03-03 22:44:09+00:00): Nur 8 Stufen (step_count=8) für eine Treppe, die über 3 Etagen (level=0;1;2;3) geht? Das glaube ich nicht.
Taksine (2025-11-17 02:52:31+00:00): Спасибо за редактирование. Желаю вам долгой и мирной жизни.
NeisBot (2025-11-17 03:54:47+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisBot (2025-11-17 03:54:47+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Pest control service in St George"
NeisReview (2025-11-19 09:33:28+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/174759298
MxxCon (2025-11-19 04:06:57+00:00): Hello.
This edit has a similar issue as your other edits. You attached camera to the perimeter of a parking lot.
MxxCon (2025-11-19 04:07:04+00:00): Hello.
This edit has a similar issue as your other edits. You attached camera to the perimeter of a parking lot.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174754156
1538615423865283 (2025-11-19 04:11:54+00:00): Fixed. I am new to this, so I apologize for the mistake.
keyyushi (2025-11-18 19:55:46+00:00): Merhaba, yanlış düzeltmeden kastınız nedir? Kullanmış olduğunuz hava görüntüsü (Bing Maps) belirtilen bölgede çok tutarlı değil. Esri hava görüntüsünü kullanırsanız daha doğru bir sonuç elde edersiniz.

Ayrıca haritalandırmış olduğunuz bütün yer bir otopark değildi. Örneğin çimin olduğu yerler. Bunları düzeltmiştim.

Site girişinin karşısının da park yeri olduğunu sanmıyorum. O yuvarlak yerin etrafında da park edilebildiğini doğrulayabilir misiniz?
os-emmer (2026-02-28 14:32:36+00:00): Hi jonboeke,
you used some unusual values for amenity=* and shop=* here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/57845290
Do I understand it right, that there are a restaurant and a hairdresser in that building?
jonboeke (2026-03-03 18:18:33+00:00): Last time I drove by both businesses were in that building. I'll try to see what the current set of stores are in there next time I go by.

https://www.bing.com/maps?cp=40.406686%7E-105.045400&lvl=20.5&style=h&dir=15&pi=60
os-emmer (2026-03-04 15:55:10+00:00): Thank you for your response,
I just split the different POIs into different nodes:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179356338
If you have updated information about the shops feel free to update the entrys.
NeisBot (2025-11-17 07:14:25+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly.

In total, I detected 18 potential crossings.

Problematic elements (top 3 by category):
- https://osm.org/way/470972350 | crossings=10
- https://osm.org/way/470972351 | crossings=8

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=174755536
MarkVB123 (2025-11-18 20:36:04+00:00): I have no clue how these 'changes' were part of a change set.  I was working to add Flock LPR cameras to the map and had no intention of changing and road segments.  I' not sure how to proceed forward to correct this unintended change set.
oba510 (2025-11-17 06:53:21+00:00): Are you sure? Both these stops still show up on the AC Transit schedule.
TronnaLegacy (2025-11-17 06:18:33+00:00): Newmarket*
TronnaLegacy (2025-11-17 06:20:17+00:00): Used MarkSeen plugin in JOSM to methodically scan over entire area to find panels
eggie (2025-11-17 08:15:18+00:00): Welkom bij OSM.
Bedankt voor uw bijdrage. 
Uw info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode.

MVG
eggie
NeisBot (2025-11-17 06:48:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisBot (2025-11-17 06:48:41+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Med spa in Woodinville offering aesthetic and wellness treatments"
pwbriggs (2025-11-17 07:51:06+00:00): Thanks. There are a few things that didn't look right, so I updated them to OpenStreetMap's standards.

I tried to approximate based on your website, but if the services you offer are different from what I've mapped, feel free to tell me which items on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:beauty are more appropriate.

Thanks!
Aethonatic (2025-12-06 00:36:59+00:00): Would planned:place=town suffice for the time being, seeing as its development plans envisions it as one?
NeisBot (2025-11-17 06:48:43+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Gift shop"
NeisBot (2025-11-17 06:48:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description
NeisRevert (2025-11-19 09:21:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/174849704
where the changeset comment is: 
Remove unclear map edits
NeisRevert (2025-11-19 09:22:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/174849735
where the changeset comment is: 
Remove unclear map edits
kalupner (2025-11-17 18:23:02+00:00): Hallo öreg,
weshalb wurden die Ackerflächen nördlich von Tautewalde gelöscht?
Soll die Gegend neu gestaltet werden?
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=174757885
VG kalupner
öreg (2025-11-17 19:09:26+00:00): Ja. Ich war am Sonntag dort Wandern. Ich habe festgestellt, dass der Acker (Farmland) garnicht so ist, wie ich doert schon seit Jahren erlebe. Ich werde versuuchen alles so zu editieren, wie es in der Wirklichkeit ist. Du Könntest mir auch helfen!                                                                Gruß      Georg
aTarom (2025-11-17 15:04:10+00:00): Hi, please, check this housenumber
"537,536,,"
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1173513979/history
Seandebasti (2025-11-18 08:00:13+00:00): Yes I will later, it’s a semi detached house on two sides so four addresses and one building has 4 addresses, so I have to figure out how to map
frosm (2026-01-29 07:36:06+00:00): Bonjour,
te souviens-tu si c'est toujours "plus de borne" ou si c'est *Electric 55" ?
Đuro Jiří (2026-01-29 12:09:11+00:00): https://api.panoramax.xyz/?s=fm;s2;m19.81/43.4440892/6.7062191;vt
rik_ (2025-11-20 11:09:29+00:00): Hi @gscholz,

kurze Nachfrage: gibt es einen bestimmten Grund, warum du den Waldweg hier gelöscht hast?

Dieser ist vor Ort vorhanden[^1] und wird auch genutzt (Jagd).

Viele Grüße

rik

[^1]: https://www.mapillary.com/app/user/rik?lat=52.198839196984&lng=13.652877900762&z=17&pKey=3349087432042459&focus=photo&mapStyle=OpenStreetMap
gscholz (2025-11-20 11:29:28+00:00): Hallo Rik,
siehe mein Kommentar "Fix overlapping ways", was zu Deutsch bedeutet, dass der Weg doppelt war. Diese Linie ist ja immer noch vorhanden:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1111529160#map=17/52.198362/13.652545

Oder brauchts du den Weg mehrfach?
Guido
rik_ (2025-11-20 12:42:46+00:00): Alles klar, das hatte ich in der Changeset-Visualisierung nicht gesehen. Sorry für die Störung!
rik_ (2025-11-20 13:35:29+00:00): Ich habe jetzt noch den Cutline-Way mit dem Track zusammengeführt.

Nach deiner Änderung lagen da tatsächlich immer noch zwei Ways direkt übereinander.

Viele Grüße

rik
habi (2025-11-17 08:00:39+00:00): Here because of https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5053805
habi (2025-12-12 09:25:34+00:00): Ciao 💙Severodonetsk💓
I would add this as 'only' a car shop, as they mostly seem to sell these.
What do you mean with 'The triangle is not valid'?
Greetings,
habi
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-17 09:00:06+00:00): @pavvv jeśli dobrze widzę to pierwsza edycja zrobiona była bez podania linku do forum i nadal nie podałeś gdzie rzekomo była zgoda na tą edycję, nikt się z tobą nie zgadza co do tej drogi a są sprzeciwy

tak, możliwe że nie doceniamy twojego geniuszu

ale "nie ma w nim konsensusu jeżeli chodzi o wycofanie" nie wydaje mi się prawdziwe, plus pomija że konsensus to był potrzebny na twoją edycję a nie na jej wycofanie
pavvv (2025-11-17 09:11:00+00:00): Ale to nie ma znaczenia, że Twoja zmiana też ma wadliwe źródło? No, nie patrzmy na nic poza moją jedną edycję bez patrzenia na dziesiątki edycji theDM albo Twoje reverty, które jako rzekome źródło podają post, który jest czysto informacyjny.

Do tego mam jeszcze pytanie do Ciebie: którego punktu definicji, którą tak bardzo chcesz umieścić na wiki, nie spełnia ta droga?
Dawid2849 (2025-11-17 09:22:53+00:00): Twoja definicja jako pierwsza nie spełniała warunków. Brak komentarzy na forum nie oznacza zgody, a drogi spoza TEN-T miały być dyskutowane. Błędną edycję, wykonaną bez zgody społeczności, można wycofać nawet bez podawania powodu tak naprawdę (choć jest to dobra praktyka, aby podać powód).

Niestety ostatnio trochę nie mam czasu na śledzenie tej przekrzykiwanki i na branie w niej udziału. Postaram się w tym tygodniu go wygospodarować. Może i bym był za podniesieniem tej drogi, ale na podstawie realnej dyskusji, a nie takiej opierającej się na zasadzie "nie było sprzeciwu, więc jest akceptacja".
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-17 12:06:01+00:00): > Ale to nie ma znaczenia, że Twoja zmiana też ma wadliwe źródło?

???????
niby czemu

> No, nie patrzmy na nic poza moją jedną edycję bez patrzenia na dziesiątki edycji theDM

nie ma obowiązku poprawienia wszystkiego na raz, nawet jak ktoś inny łamie zasady (a nie wiem czy to robi) nie pozwala to robieniu tobie

> albo Twoje reverty, które jako rzekome źródło podają post, który jest czysto informacyjny.

wycofam jeszcze raz - chodziło oczywiście o cały wątek z późniejszymi odpowiedziami
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-17 12:07:34+00:00): wycofanie zgodnie z dyskusją na forum: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/stosowanie-tagu-highway-trunk-w-polsce/122106/1225  i późniejsze (zwłaszcza https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/stosowanie-tagu-highway-trunk-w-polsce/122106/1259 jest godne uwagi)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174768562
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-17 12:09:19+00:00): pisałem też na Discordzie, napisze i tutaj: nie zawracaj mi głowy edycjami theDM (czy innych) chyba że są wadliwe, do wycofania i możesz je podlinkować

naprawdę nie brak mi rzeczy do zrobienia, jak nie potrafisz znaleźć tych rzekomo wadliwych edycji to ja ich szukać nie będę
habi (2025-11-17 08:24:57+00:00): Copy-paste Fehler: Ich habe hier Notizen https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5054327 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5054324 gelöst.
Tina Cao (2025-12-11 06:49:51+00:00): The small box is still here. Can it be removed？
toster234 (2025-11-19 17:44:48+00:00): Why did you edit this road? It is still under renovation and, moreover, it is not passable.

https://toster.dev/images/osm/photo_2025-11-19_18-42-48.jpg
https://toster.dev/images/osm/photo_2025-11-19_18-42-49.jpg
https://toster.dev/images/osm/photo_2025-11-19_18-42-50%20(2).jpg
https://toster.dev/images/osm/photo_2025-11-19_18-42-50.jpg
Flamen_Sru (2025-11-21 06:55:28+00:00): Hi toster234,
While combining the driveway connections, I realized TomTom proprietary GPS traces showed very recent vehicular activity. Thinking that the construction is completed, I removed the construction tags. Thanks a lot for the photos you provided, they are very helpful. I have made the corrections and reverted the construction status.
thopf (2025-11-17 12:08:04+00:00): Hallo!
Ich habe es schon zweimal richtig eingezeichnet, zweimal wurde es von dir leider abgeändert und ist nicht korrekt. Die östliche Einfahrtweiche zur Remise III liegt auf Höhe des östlichen Endes des Unterwerks und führt als Gleisverschlingung bis zum Einfahrtbogen. Ich bessere es nochmals aus. Bitte jetzt so belassen! Danke! LG.
_-@-_ FahrplanSeppl (2025-11-17 12:49:31+00:00): Hallo,
gut, dann greife ich es nicht mehr an. Kannst du dann wenigsten die Gleisverschlingung entweder näher zusammen oder weiter auseinander geben? Brauche es für mein GIS (RBL System der Graz Linien) welches auf OSM basiert.
Die Gleislagen korrigiere ich bereits laufend, weil sie teilweise recht weit daneben liegen. Und so wie es jetzt hier drinnen ist stimmt mein Routing nicht, weil er mir sonst ein Stockgleis einließt.
LG
Carto75 (2025-11-19 10:46:42+00:00): Bonjour, merci pour votre contribution. Pour les adresses, vous pouvez utiliser l'outil Pifomètre qui vous permettra d'intégrer plus facilement toutes les adresses de la rue, voire de la ville :)

https://bano.openstreetmap.fr/pifometre/pifomap.html?insee=56053&ratio=no#map=14.37/47.73919/-2.58662
mikaelleberre (2025-11-19 22:02:49+00:00): Merci pour votre réponse.
Je vais tenter de supprimer les numéros et passer par pifometre si cela est la bonne technique
trjdjx (2025-12-16 14:34:06+00:00): I have added "highway=unclassified" back to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/243812354 . Because I suspect it was removed by mistake.
Colbertson (2025-11-17 16:10:26+00:00): why the thumbnail link
Tomas Straupis (2025-11-17 16:38:19+00:00): We use it in our Lithuanian community products.
BCNorwich (2025-11-18 08:34:14+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Sorry to say that you placed a new highway, Way: Boundary Way (1451310436), on top of an existing highway. This makes a duplication of highways, which could cause disruption to routing. It's OSM practice to amend/correct any existing feature rather than map a new feature, especially not to duplicate features. This practice also maintains the history of a feature.
I've removed the duplicate highway and transferred the amended tags to the existing highway.

Your new wood feature Relation: Dalbuaik Plantation (19848349) is not needed as you have also mapped a duplicate area Way: Dalbuaik Plantation (1451307977). I've removed the relation, as it is a duplicated feature.

Another problem is that you've got some wood/forest areas overlapping, some duplicated. There are lots of wood area nodes joined to the track. This makes any future editing to the areas much more difficult as the future mapper will have to unpick the areas from the track and sort out where the area outlines should be. But this doesn't affect routing, so I've left this.

Regards Bernard.
Comino (2025-11-17 10:02:14+00:00): Please check your tags, as they are causing a tagging error.
JohnDoe202 (2025-11-17 23:01:23+00:00): Have reviewed the tags and cannot find any issues. 
What's the tagging error and how can you see it?
Comino (2025-11-18 01:11:26+00:00): 1.	Open https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13310610017
2.	Go into edit-mode
3.	Switch the list of tags into “text mode”
4.	Look at the tags :-)
oba510 (2025-11-17 10:03:31+00:00): source also includes Mapillary