piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
map per (2023-03-14 18:58:19+00:00): REVERTED (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133351373)
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2023-03-30 12:04:47+00:00): الله يكتب أجرك يا شيخ منصور وشكرا لك على هذه الجهود
E4aG4r (2023-03-08 07:49:37+00:00): Hallo pitfire,

was hast du hier korrigiert?
Ich möchte in Leichlingen weitere Rasenflächen markieren und würde es gerne in Zukunft direkt richtig machen.

Grüße,
E4aG4r
pitfire (2023-03-08 09:49:17+00:00): Hallo E4aG4r,
erst einmal wilkommen bei OSM.
Ich sende Dir eine Mail mit den Einzelheiten. 
Gruß pitfire
luiswoo (2023-03-08 08:30:30+00:00): По идее должно быть Антоновская балка
map per (2023-03-14 18:57:32+00:00): REVERTED (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133351373)
NorthCrab_upload (2023-03-08 07:10:19+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10687289901
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1148700412

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
tyfi (2023-03-08 07:12:05+00:00): I don't remember the exact time, but a new one was opened at Ozark
aTarom (2023-03-08 08:12:51+00:00): Hi, marcus_jenkins,
please check all these import tags
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1152607548/history
If you need help, don't doubt to ask the community at
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/es/51
cheers
aTarom (2023-03-08 08:33:20+00:00): https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1s9r
alga (2023-03-08 13:58:19+00:00): Wiki rašo, kad building:part yra papildomas tagas prie building. Be building nesirenderina išvis. Ten baseine bajeris tas, kad virš cokolinio aukšto bus pieva, t.y. tik tas antras aukštas matysis satelite arba šiaip vietoje iš šonų ar iš nugaros.
alga (2023-03-08 14:00:19+00:00): https://cdn.citify.eu/data/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Citify-Lazdyn%C5%B3-baseinas-01.jpg
Tomas Straupis (2023-03-08 15:02:41+00:00): Manau papildomas ta prasme, kad geometrijos, kurios aprašomos su building:part turi turėti apimančias building geometrijas. Bet tai nereiškia, kad reikia kartoti building žymą ant visų dalių, kurios building:part atveju labai stipriai persidengs (persidengimas mane ir atvedė prie baseino).
Žodžiu kiek matau iš praktikos: visas perimetras žymimas building žyma. Toliau viduje braižom kiek reikia geometrijų, dedam joms building:part ir reikiamas aukščio, pradžios, pabaigos žymas. Ir tos building:part tada gali belekaip persidengti.
Pažiūrėk senamiestį, ten yra nemažai 3D informacijos privesta. building niekur nepersidengia.
Lazdynų baseino atveju mano galva bendras perimetras: building+building:part su pradžia keli metrai aukščiau žemės ir aukščiu nuo ten kažkiek tai metrų. Tada viduje kitas building:part su pradžia nuo 0m ir aukščiu iki tiek, kur anksčiau aprašyto apatinė pradžia.
Palolo (2023-03-13 22:20:38+00:00): Please check the AI work on way 627413200 it appears that many nodes became detached from the way.
Samwel Kyando_Import Account (2023-03-22 11:09:51+00:00): Thanks for the comment.
those unconnected ways/ nodes in this area has been fixed.
Rainero (2023-03-10 22:00:21+00:00): Auch hier: 15 Busrelationen kaputt durch Aufteilung des Kreisverkehrs, daher habe ich das revertiert.
VG,
Rainer
map per (2023-03-14 18:56:56+00:00): REVERTED (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133351373)
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-11-20 12:27:19+00:00): ten parkrun jest jakoś oznakowany w terenie?
gszkr (2023-11-24 15:57:24+00:00): Na pewno start i meta na asfalcie w Cichym Kąciku.
Frans S (2023-03-10 10:57:50+00:00): About mapping of tall apartment blocks

Mapping of tall buildings differs from standard buildings. Because the imagery is taken at an angle, you see both the rooflines and also the side of a building. 
How do you map such a building?
Map over the rooflines and lastly slide the mapped building to the footprint.
Please adjust wrong positioned buildings as well
This video shows how that is done.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1V5-bADsYiffCD9bo6l64YOdTvmKqMGry/view?usp=share_link

And.... don't forget to square each rectangular building.

Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2023-03-20 10:14:38+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
Good job.

Hello. Thanks for mapping on this difficult task.
About mapping of tall apartment blocks or high buildings

Mapping of tall buildings differs from standard buildings. Because the imagery is taken at an angle, you will see both the rooflines and also the side of a building. 
How do you map such a building?
Map over the rooflines and lastly slide the mapped building to the footprint.
Please adjust wrong positioned buildings as well
This video shows how that is done.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1V5-bADsYiffCD9bo6l64YOdTvmKqMGry/view?usp=share_link

And.... don't forget to square each rectangular building.

Best regards and keep mapping
Rainero (2023-03-10 22:01:46+00:00): und auch hier wurden die Busrelationen beschädigt, daher revertiert.
VG,
Rainer
Palolo (2023-03-13 22:20:20+00:00): Please check the AI work on way 627413200 it appears that many nodes became detached from the way.
Samwel Kyando_Import Account (2023-03-22 10:58:35+00:00): Thanks for the comment.
A lot of unconnected ways and detached node in this area has been fixed.
wemissyou (2023-03-08 19:22:09+00:00): is it Arethousa or Aretousa?!
Layft Greater (2023-03-08 19:51:02+00:00): Arethousa
Layft Greater (2023-03-08 19:51:46+00:00): The sign is visible from Kerkiras street in front of the Olympic Residence
Frans S (2023-03-20 17:13:00+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this task.
I don't know if you realized it, but you mapped high buildings incorrect.
You mapped both the visible sidewall and the roof.


About mapping of tall apartment blocks or high buildings

Mapping of tall buildings differs from standard buildings. Because the imagery is taken at an angle, you will see both the rooflines and also the side of a building. 
How do you map such a building?
Map over the rooflines and lastly slide the mapped building to the footprint.
Please adjust wrong positioned buildings as well
This video shows how that is done.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1V5-bADsYiffCD9bo6l64YOdTvmKqMGry/view?usp=share_link

And.... don't forget to square each rectangular building.

Best regards and keep mapping
vnourdin (2023-03-08 13:08:22+00:00): Bonjour, apparemment, vous n'avez pas seulement ajouté un portail dans ce groupe de modification.
Essayez de sauvegarder chaque modification séparément, c'est plus simple pour les vérifier ensuite.
Glassman (2023-03-09 17:55:19+00:00): I reverted this edit. This is not a park.
LockOnGuy (2023-03-12 05:12:40+00:00): Hello Muhammad Faiq Kalhury, Please stop changing the admin levels. Do not use the proposal admin levels but use the current admin levels only. See: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Iraq#:~:text=the%20central%20administration.-,Current%20implementation%20in%20OSM,-admin_level     
Also please good changeset comment so we know what you changed, "Fixed some bugs" do not explain what you edited here, please read: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments      
Regards.
eggie (2023-03-08 09:15:01+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback  Het stond natuurlijk gewoon al op slot voor fietsers. Wat staat er precies op de borden?
Vrije wandeling op wegen en paden? 


Geef in je commentaar aan wat je hebt gedaan svp. 


MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-03-08 09:20:07+00:00): Rene,
Op een deel van de wegen (Veerweg) heb je bicycle=no getagd, maar daar staat het dus gewoon open voor elke andere vorm van verkeer.. Auto, brommer e.d. 
Alles mag.. behalve fietsen?  Dat lijkt me onwaarschijnlijk. 
Graag reactie
eggie
eggie (2023-03-08 09:39:35+00:00): Van de track Veerweg heb ik bicycle=no verwijderd.. Dar loopt een G13 fietspad naast  (Onverplicht fietspad) 
Ga svp nog na welke bebording er staat zodat de accesstags hier kloppen.
MVG
eggie
user_12523467 (2023-03-08 15:40:45+00:00): thanks for updating the map while you traveling Iraq, have a pleasant trip.
bernardo60 (2024-11-09 04:12:06+00:00): All these alleyways ("gang" in Indonesia) are too narrow for a four-wheeled vehicle to pass and should be tagged as a path, not a street.
amtplskaart (2024-11-19 03:56:08+00:00): I used to tag this kind of "alley" as "path" but since there are problems with motorcycle routing in to these 'gang' then I start using "living_street" with additional "motorcar=no" as other contributor did in Indonesia.
In fact these 'gang' is different from "alley" as we know as a part from "highway=service".
f_husni (2024-11-19 04:20:02+00:00): Hello bernardo, permission to add. actually mostly communities in Indonesia used tag for "gang" as living street and if that living street can't passed by 4W, we can add tag motorcar=no.  i recommend you to join on group telegram OSM Indonesia in this link for more updates https://t.me/osmindonesia
TheSwavu (2023-03-08 08:56:57+00:00): Wrong comment. Should be removed superfluous way ...
Compatie (2023-03-08 11:20:23+00:00): Hello vladimirkoenvarin

This political opinion should not be expressed on OpenStreetMap.

Moreover you don't tell us what you did in your changeset. « РОССИЯ - ПОБЕДА БУДЕТ ЗА НАМИ » is not a correct changeset comment. Please see the wiki for more informations.
AndersAndersson (2023-03-08 18:59:51+00:00): Russia will not win anything. At least not by invading other countries or by changing Ukrainian names to Russian names in OSM.

I will revert this changeset.
AndersAndersson (2023-03-08 19:19:54+00:00): Someone else had already reverted it.
TheOutpost (2023-03-13 03:05:49+00:00): Strange this user asked for review.
Lyon-St-Clair (2023-03-13 16:25:44+00:00): banned for 10 years
gscholz (2023-03-09 07:04:38+00:00): Hi Seyfettin_Gundogdu,
your recent changesets have left behind several errors in the OSM database regarding not connected ways (red dots):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=34.40835&lat=36.82967&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1

As you may know these ways cannot be used by routing software.
Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
ivanbranco (2023-03-09 16:59:33+00:00): Ciao Enzo, benvenuto su OSM.

Grazie per questi preziosi contributi, i nomi delle strade sono preziosi. Dovresti però selezionare le strade già esistenti e modificare il loro nome. Quello che stai facendo tu è creare nuove strade sovrapposte a quelle già esistenti e dando il nome a loro. Ti giro dei link in privato dove puoi trovare risorse per imparare meglio o farti aiutare dalla community (tipo Telegram). 

Grazie ancora e buon mapping :)
mavl (2023-03-08 11:47:39+00:00): Здравствуйте, vladimirkoenvarin. Пожалуйста, добавляйте на карту только существующие в реальности объекты.  
  
Владимир Маршинин  
Рабочая группа по данным
salisburymistake (2023-03-09 01:54:16+00:00): I know from personal experience, but you can check the latest Bing imagery. There is no longer any access from Laurel to 9th Street and vice versa. An underpass was constructed on Laurel just east of 9th for the high speed rail project and the slope made reconnecting the two streets impossible. They've closed it off on both sides of Laurel. Please revert this changeset. Let me know if you need any help.
salisburymistake (2023-03-09 01:59:50+00:00): Actually... just noticed the access=no on this. I'm guessing you're attempting to preserve the continuity of the Historic US 66 relation?
Warin61 (2023-03-14 02:42:59+00:00): Hi,

Relation 15577991 does not make sense? natural=wood;heath err no. It is either heath or wood. And both members are 'outers' yet one is inside the other. 
Looks to me like way 1152292927 should be tagged natural=wood (as it was before this changeset) and then have the role 'inner' in the relation. The relation should be tagged natural=heath

See what you think.
Ydgfb (2023-03-15 08:00:33+00:00): Hi
I've gone ahead and fixed the relation, thanks for letting me know. Please let me know if it needs any more fixing. Thanks.
Frans S (2023-03-12 10:21:30+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
About highway tagging:

Please apply the rules described in this wiki
Most common taggings.
Rural areas : Unclassified,  track , path, service
Urban areas: unclassified, residential, path.


https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highways

Read also the remarks about tagging of tracks in the instructions.
Best regards and keep mapping
elgolfo (2023-03-08 11:42:41+00:00): Hi Stefan, 
ist da wirklich ein Tor? Auf Mapillary, bei Bing und Berlin/Geoportal DOP20RGBI (2022) ist da nichts von zu sehen.
Moritz
StefanHRT (2023-03-08 14:09:26+00:00): Hi Moritz, Da ich versuche nichts mehr in OSM zu machen, hatte ich meinen Kollegen von unterwegs aus gebeten das zu bearbeiten. Da ist ein Tor bzw. Zaunfeld als Barriere durch die Anwohner gesetzt. Ob legitim oder nicht, keine Ahnung, aber eine Nutzung des Weges für die Öffentlichkeit ist nicht gegeben. In ein paar Tagen kannst Du es selbst auf neuen Fotos sehen. Und ja ich kenne meine Fotos auf Mapillary, ich hatte den Weg ja einst auch aufgrund des Namens vom Weg eingetragen, er war vorher nicht da. VG Stefan
NorthCrab_upload (2023-03-08 09:50:27+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9781733055
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1152629401

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Frans S (2023-03-12 16:04:12+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this task
About highway tagging:

Please Please apply the rules described in this wiki
Most common taggings.
Rural areas : Unclassified,  track , path, service
Urban areas: unclassified, residential, path.


https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highways

Read also the remarks about tagging of tracks in the instructions.
Best regards and keep mapping
Tilia_J (2023-03-17 13:30:09+00:00): Footway door fietsenstalling onterecht verwijderd, weer door mij teruggezet
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-11 05:21:59+00:00): Zerkniesz na https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3593198 ?
joost schouppe (2023-11-23 13:36:59+00:00): The hospital is already mapped here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5653300
So no need to add that tag. I've removed it.
Yunan973 (2023-07-26 13:33:45+00:00): Hi,

why to keep it in osm ?
With no type, this relation is useless, no  ?
If this route is now impossible for mtb (for example because of a big landslide), to delete the relation is maybe better.
But if people can use it, the tags type/route could be restored and the tag ref could be changed into old_ref (with a description or a note to explain why now an old_ref).
Even if the route is no more an official route, maybe it is ok to keep it in osm ?

Best regards
_torsten_ (2023-07-27 09:05:33+00:00): I'm having trouble deleting a route/relation. It could be that the route will be put back into operation. It is then easier to change the corresponding tags than to re-enter the entire route.
In this case, new routes have been installed instead of this route. It probably has something to do with the access rights of the paths.

Kind regards, Torsten.
Yunan973 (2023-07-29 19:55:13+00:00): Ok, I understand.

I changed a little the relation to add 2 ways to fix gaps (123453267 and 1193220480) and to remove north part (noexit way 124704592 and 1117646017).

If needed, improve my changes.

Best regards
_torsten_ (2023-07-30 17:31:37+00:00): Thank you for your changes and additions. Now someone has to check on site whether there are any old markings.

Best regards!
avinet_ua (2023-03-08 10:39:28+00:00): street names for public transport were capitalizaed, no other changes were made
ivanbranco (2023-03-09 16:53:52+00:00): Hi adrienBLN,

what's the source for this edit?
You created a big industrial landuse that has inside residential houses, a university, a church ecc.
ALn_668 (2023-03-15 20:57:22+00:00): ... also, if the area is only *proposed* you should use the "proposed" key, possibly providing a source - otherwise it is only a vandalism.
ALn_668 (2023-03-27 08:48:21+00:00): No answer provided, also this is the only changeset for the user. Reverted in #134166512.
ivanbranco (2023-03-09 16:51:17+00:00): Ciao Liz Kxan, benvenut su OSM

davvero l'intero edificio è stato costruito come palestra?
d_berger (2023-03-08 13:09:56+00:00): Auch dieser versteckte "Kreuzungsrückbau" ist blanker Vandalismus.
ETR670 (2023-03-20 09:02:02+00:00): Hallo 

Meine Änderungen basieren auf dem, was ich vor Ort gesehen habe. Wo genau hast du etwas abweichendes gesehen?
GartenStuhl (2023-03-20 11:53:36+00:00): Während des Umbaus der WB gab es eine Zeit lang solch eine Verkehrsführung... Das ist sicher schon ein bis zwei Jahre her...
Warum man also die korrekt eingetragene Kreuzung einfach so aus OSM rauslöscht, obschon offensichtlich nur eine temporäre Verkehrsführung, ist auch mir schleierhaft.

Die BLT veröffentlichte (1*) einige Videos bei Youtube zum Umbau der WB, worauf unter anderem auch die Kreuzung im Endzustand zu sehen ist.
1 = https://youtu.be/H8icLSm9AXE?t=200
GartenStuhl (2023-03-23 07:16:54+00:00): Kreuzung wieder weitestgehend in den Ursprungszustand versetzt mit:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133977236
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-04-22 14:01:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135228709, 135225625 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to fictional edits.
eggie (2023-03-08 11:54:28+00:00): Beste Karel Een woonef heeft een wettelijke status en is dan bebord met het bord woonerf.
Is dat hier het geval? De wettelijke 'maxspeed' op een woonerf bedraagt 15 km/u

Staat er dus een bord woonerf hier?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-03-08 11:57:52+00:00): Na jaren weer een bijdrage, maar nu in Nederland.. daarom Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-03-08 12:05:42+00:00): 'k Denk dat dit geen woonerven zijn, maar beter als highway=track gemapt kan worden met access=private. 
maxspeed 20 kan wellicht ook weg of er 'moet' een bordje staan.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-03-08 21:33:46+00:00): Hoogte aangepast naar 3.5 ipv 3,5
en...
woonerf omgezet naar track.. Laat even weten als er wel een bord woonerf hier staat dan pas ik het weer aan, maar ook de maxspeed.
MVG
eggie
user_5359 (2023-03-10 07:35:39+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Wenn Du den Namen eines Geschäftes änderst solltest Du auch name:de achten. Das gilt auch für die weiteren Schlüssel, die ein Geschäft beschreiben wie Kontaktinformationen oder (hier cuisine)
Mazda05 (2023-06-07 16:06:14+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/337699054/
Mazda05 (2023-06-07 16:06:47+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3136474
Mazda05 (2023-06-07 16:07:50+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3734904
avinet_ua (2023-06-07 19:34:46+00:00): 3 fixed
jeslop (2023-03-08 12:40:06+00:00): Hola Anna Lagunas. Creo que has tenido algún problema con el teclado y te han quedado unas etiquetas un tanto extrañas. Revierto este conjunto de cambios.

Saludos

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
NorthCrab_upload (2023-03-08 11:30:21+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10720916307

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
d_berger (2023-03-08 12:30:07+00:00): Das ist nicht die neue uic_ref gemäss Didok, sämtliche Haltestellen haben neu Namen nach Tram-/Busmuster, nicht nach Eisenbahnmuster. Auch die Platzierung der Stationsnode ist falsch.
d_berger (2023-03-08 12:55:22+00:00): Und das ist schlicht nur Vandalismus.
pio2_122 (2023-03-08 14:39:09+00:00): Drogi na terenie szpitala są objęte strefą zamieszkania (błędna zmiana na z highway=living_street na service) i nie stanową wyłącznie dojazdu dla służb ratunkowych (co sugeruje dodany tag service=emergency_access): https://goo.gl/maps/4oVw8PZzqPdMJnZ16

Zmiany wycofane.
L'imaginaire (2024-09-15 18:09:33+00:00): Hallo,
Mag ik nog even terugkomen op deze wijzigingenset? Ik vroeg me af of we het pad dat je bijgetekend hebt (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/681358181#map=17/51.091028/2.587854&layers=N) niet beter als bridleway zouden taggen. Heb jij daar een idee over?

Vriendelijke groeten,
Seppe
gurglypipe (2023-03-08 11:28:19+00:00): Sources:
 - https://www.geograph.org.uk/of/fleetwood+hospital
 - https://www.blackpoolgazette.co.uk/health/work-starts-to-transform-former-fleetwood-hospital-into-community-hub-1386230
somix (2023-03-08 13:44:31+00:00): ref остановок, источник - карта на станции метро
Joseph R P (2023-03-17 23:36:36+00:00): Hello, a while back I downgraded this section to primary because it is a scenic parkway that doesn't allow trucks and is closely paralleled by the more-important US 1, therefore not making it a trunk road. It should be worth noting that the highways around Virginia and Washington DC are classified based on their importance rather than their physical construction. Trunk roads in this case are non-freeways that serve as connectors between two destinations of significance rather than just expressways (which are now indicated by expressway=yes tags). 

For example, VA 28 has some expressway and even freeway sections (which are tagged with expressway=yes and highway=motorway respectively), but is also a surface street through Manassas or a two-lane rural highway. It does meet the criteria for trunk however as it links places like Herndon and Manassas towards Culpeper and Charlottesville.

Another example is Fairfax County Parkway which is fully expressway/freeway, but the reason it does meet trunk criteria is due to it being a major highway that carries traffic travelling between Woodbridge/Lorton and Fairfax/Reston.

The non-freeway sections of GWMP do seem like good candidates for trunk classification considering they are major commuter routes and bypass some of the Alexandria sprawl, but it's mainly intended to be a scenic bypass and lacks a full interchange with the Beltway and does not allow heavy traffic, each of which would be more convincing to make it a trunk route (and it certainly would be one if that were the case, and Us 1 would be the primary route), but for those reasons it's better as primary.
whammo (2023-03-18 00:39:43+00:00): Ok, acknowledging this is more of an art than a science and that you have more experience with highway tagging in Virginia than me, I guess my confusion comes partially from wondering why every GWMP section north of the DCA interchange is classified as motorway, and yet this section was primary. The physical characteristics of those sections are identical to this one, and there is no population center on the north end and I would argue of equal "importance." Also confused how a motorway can transition directly into a primary road with no discernible physical difference or having passed a population center of importance. 

The GWMP strikes me as comparable to the Suitland Parkway across the Potomac in almost every way, which is tagged as trunk throughout. Anyway, I don't feel all that strongly but happy to discuss more.