piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Bruno Girin (2024-07-14 11:37:47+00:00): I wasn't aware of that page, this is very useful thank.

However, it doesn't provide any guidance for names. Where can I find this?
pitscheplatsch (2024-07-14 11:41:49+00:00): Glad I could help.

Some general information about the name tag can be found here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name
Bruno Girin (2024-07-14 11:55:05+00:00): OK, that's useful thanks. However, I have follow up questions.

Today we name the trees according to their cultivars in order to identify them more easily. When the tree has a label attached, the name matches the label. However, the name page suggests that maybe we shouldn't name them, in which case, I could clean this up. Is it OK to name them in line with the labels?

If naming them is OK, which of the names used are unusual and should be changed?
Frederik (2024-07-15 00:12:17+00:00): Thanks for updating these - I was only visiting so great to have you set things straight.
andreymarkin (2024-07-15 11:46:59+00:00): If you are Russian, answer this message in Russian in Russian, I have a question for you
Stalker61 (2024-07-19 17:27:55+00:00): Локализация JOSM (RU)
HellMap (2024-07-25 11:51:58+00:00): Lūgums nelikt ceļiem `bicycle=no`, ja šeit nav pārvietošanās aizlieguma. Uz ceļiem `access` tegi ir priekš atļautās/legālās izmantošanas un šeit nekas neliedz braukt ar velo.
theDM (2025-08-07 23:00:52+00:00): ten chodnik dalej jest w planach czy plany ograniczył się do odcinka Tokary - Miszewo?
Marek-M (2025-08-08 05:56:59+00:00): Jechałem tędy w zeszłym tygodniu i nie ma śladu, żeby jakakolwiek budowa miała się odbywać w najbliższym czasie. Być może jest to w jakichś innych planach nowego przetargu ale tego nie sprawdzałem. Można wywalić proposed :)
une abeille (2024-07-21 05:22:08+00:00): Please do not put names on objects that describe what they are.
kitsee (2024-07-13 18:26:03+00:00): Hi there Will,
Welcome to OSM. I would like to make a few comments about this changeset. firstly, landuse=farm is a deprecated tag and should not be used. the original landuse=farmyard would be more appropriate here. Secondly I can see you've added crop=grass to a field, this is perfectly fine if this is specifically a field for growing a grass type crop. however if this is actually a grazing field for animals then it should be tagged with landuse=meadow instead of farmland. farmland is specifically for growing land. 
Hope this helps, 
Kind regards,
Kits
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153904407
WillFR130 (2024-07-13 21:20:03+00:00): Hi there Kits. 
Thank you very much for your input. I'm very new to this. 
what would you recommend that i use for this field? as it is both used for crowing a grass crop for summer  and used for grazing in winter.
thank you for your time.
Will
JassKurn (2024-07-14 15:28:42+00:00): Hi  WillFR130 

Tagging is difficult, especially in the UK, where we assume the use of English words for tags, mean what they state.

Generally it good advice to  map using the wiki.

In the UK farmland is generally split into two types, Arable Farming and Pastoral Farming. Unfortunately during the evolution of OSM we ended with (arguably) confusing tags. I believe because for much of the world grazing animals roam across open areas, and not the dense network of fields found in NorthWest Europe.

Arable Farming land is mapped as..
landuse=farmland
crop=(type)

Pastoral Farming land is mapped as..
landuse=meadow
meadow=pasture

Your fields are used for Pastoral Farming, and should be mapped as such. It's common in the UK for Pastoral Farmers to cut the grass (for silage etc) a few times during the summer. But it should still fall under Pastoral Farming.

So tag the fields as
landuse=meadow
meadow=pasture

Have a look at the following three wiki pages.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse=farmyard?uselang=en-GB

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dfarmland

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dmeadow

It can be useful to also add the hedges, but be careful to make sure they are broken up and don't create an area.

Also helpful on farm to map track and service roads, and add the access key if known.
eg access=private.
Problem with with walkers using maps being routed along private tracks missing access rules.

Jass Kurn
emersonveenstra (2024-07-15 11:55:10+00:00): Hi there,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/578943658 had "not:brand:wikidata=Q4672981" on it, so did you check to make sure that it actually was part of the Ace Hardware brand, and if so, could you please remove the not:brand:wikidata tag to avoid confusion?
whammo (2024-07-16 02:31:27+00:00): I did not check before uploading, but it appears the ATP info was correct, and the existing `not:brand:wikidata` tag was not. Again, (as I mentioned here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153929369) this import is not meant to go through every POI to do cleanup, I'm just adding info. So I will try to look for this going forward, but this is an edge of an edge case (an erroneous `not:brand:wikidata` tag, of which there are <3,000 in the US to begin with) that I suspect I won't encounter again.
Peter Towers (2024-07-19 01:28:11+00:00): Around the Southwest area of I 495 near Springfield, Virginia, there was a part where the express lanes were too off centered from the satellite imagery being too close to the ramps at an intersection & that interchange in the one where I 495 and US Route 620 intersects.
bxl-forever (2024-07-13 19:11:33+00:00): Pour effacer une forme depuis l'éditeur iD : clic droit sur le contour de l'élément + icône Delete (poubelle).

Mais ici, comme la forme est toujours visible sur la carte GRB (référence officielle Vlaams Gewest) on peut changer le bâtiment en demolished:building=shed.  C'est fait.
mavl (2024-11-13 06:16:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159077163 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible sources - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16857].
CurlingMan13 (2024-07-14 09:07:41+00:00): Was this an import?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153905566
nl-mapper (2024-07-14 09:21:42+00:00): No this not a import.
Brummelwuff (2024-07-13 18:40:20+00:00): Oh falscher Text:
Eisenbahnflächer hinzugefügt
Friendly_Ghost (2024-07-13 19:01:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted in full.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153906250
marczoutendijk (2024-07-13 19:31:00+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16444

 
Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
Friendly_Ghost (2024-07-13 20:13:01+00:00): tyvm Marc :)
NorthCrab_upload (2024-07-13 18:50:22+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1301155119

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Kamil8202 (2024-07-13 18:59:29+00:00): Bardzo dziękuje za uwagę, wpisując ulice właśnie nie wiedziałem czy zostawić puste, czy wpisać miejscowość. 
Teraz będę wiedział. 😊
NorthCrab (2024-07-13 19:30:53+00:00): Hej! W takich miejscach miejscach jak tu, gdzie nie ma nazwy ulicy najlepiej jest przekazać addr:place=Paszczyna, pomijając addr:city i addr:street. Niestety edytor iD nie ułatwia tej edycji i trzeba to zmienić ręcznie w liście tagów. Już podmieniłem, pozdrawiam i dzięki :-)!
bxl-forever (2024-07-13 21:38:19+00:00): Hello,

I am afraid we have a double tagging issue here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1301155225 + https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4068473279 convey the same information with similar tags, that should not happen.

Also, please do not use dummy titles such as ".", "fixes" or "aanvulling" for most of your changes, it looks like obfuscation of what you are really doing, this is why your latest changes were flagged as potentially suspicious and set for review.

Happy mapping.
koenstr (2024-07-17 19:08:16+00:00): Fixed.
LockOnGuy (2024-07-14 01:25:58+00:00): I asked you yesterday on changeset 153876728 for the sources for your changes on the boundaries, you did not answer my question, if you change boundaries without saying why or provide sources and refuse to answer the questions and comments then I will be forced to revert them. Please communicate and specify the sources and say what did you do and why.    
Regards.
dieterdreist (2024-07-22 22:45:14+00:00): Ciao mau59, questo percorso way 124643469 non esiste proprio più, è stato cambiata la disposizione delle strade.

Saluti
Martin
mau59 (2024-07-23 08:26:37+00:00): Ciao di nuovo Martin e grazie per la correzione. Ho una conoscenza diretta solo di una piccolissima percentuale dei luoghi che mappo, per cui mi affido quasi esclusivamente a Bing Maps, che chiaramente può non essere aggiornata e comunque non mostra sempre tutti i particolari necessari (risoluzione insufficiente, zone in ombra, ecc.).

Un saluto,
Maurizio
dieterdreist (2024-07-23 11:23:21+00:00): Ciao Maurizio, grazie della risposta, lo so che alle volte non è possibile capire la situazione da remoto, ti avevo scritto per darti un feedback dove ho notato problemi, ma ti vorrei anche ringraziare per tutti i contributi che dai!
Saluti
Martin
SomeoneElse (2024-07-14 18:41:10+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16451
literan (2024-07-23 17:39:54+00:00): а маршрут маркирован на местности?
zorglubu (2024-07-15 09:40:57+00:00): Bonjour,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/84040126
Je suis très surpris de voir cette route, en plein milieu des bois, passer en sens unique vers l'ouest. Surtout qu'on voit très bien, à l'Est, sur les photos prises du ciel, le marquage au sol d'un panneau "cédez le passage". Ou est-ce un sens unique temporaire ?
Confirmez-vous qu'il ne s'agit pas d'une erreur ? Dans ce cas le panneau ne devrait plus exister.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/295290090#map=17/45.43369/2.34070
Vous avez passé ce tronçon de route en access=no. Quelle en est la raison ? Y-a-t-il une barrière ? La route est-elle devenue privée ? Ou s'agit-il de simples travaux ?

Dans les deux cas, s'il s'agit de restrictions temporaires pourriez-vous mettre une note sur les objets précisant la durée estimée de cette restriction ? Ou sinon, décrivant quel est le problème rencontré ?
Merci.
:-)
Turbodelphi (2024-07-16 08:06:41+00:00): Bonjour,

Concernant le premier point, un panneau interdisant la circulation à tout véhicule (sens interdit) est bien présent en bord de route et sans indication dune mesure temporaire. Je tiens la photo du panneau à votre disposition.
Oui, vu du ciel, les marquages apparaissent encore et même dans Google mais on voit lesdits marquages, mais la réalité en juillet 2024 est différente.

Concernant le deuxième problème, ce tronçon de route est strictement autorisé aux engins agricoles et sans indication de durée. N'ayant pas trouvé d'options adaptées dans la liste de choix, j'ai donc mis comme une simple interdiction. Je vous laisse le soin d'appliquer une solution plus adaptée si elle existe.

Ces deux modifications font suite aux constats rencontrés la semaine dernière lors d'une sortie vélo dans le secteur.

Cordialement,
Philippe leclercq
zorglubu (2024-07-17 12:04:45+00:00): Merci pour l'éclaircissement.

Je vais supprimer le panneau "cédez le passage" pour la cohérence.

Si "strictement autorisé aux engins agricoles" signifie bien que c'est interdit pour les autres véhicules dans les deux sens, on a l'attribut access=agricultural qui pourrait convenir.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Dagricultural

Qu'en pensez-vous ?
Turbodelphi (2024-07-19 08:25:00+00:00): Les solutions proposées me semblent tout à fait appropriées.
Merci d'effectuer les corrections.
Bien cordialement, 
Turbodelphi
zorglubu (2024-07-19 14:55:26+00:00): fait
Szymson (2024-07-13 19:35:07+00:00): OSM nie służy do przechowywania danych historycznych, po torach nie ma żadnych śladów, ten zestaw nadaje się do wycofania
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-07-14 21:12:22+00:00): More messed up highways. The least you could do is do a once over to make sure there's no errors after
zstadler (2024-07-14 08:05:24+00:00): Hello Jobigutenburg,

In this edit you attached political statements to the "name:ml" of 3 places:
https://osm.org/node/581141063 - "Gaza Strip (Palestine)"
https://osm.org/node/1472876649 - "West Bank (Palestine)"
https://osm.org/node/4937968922 - "Golan Heights (Syria)"

Unfortunately, this is not the first time you receive comments related to political edits:
https://osm.org/changeset/121629555
https://osm.org/changeset/136014410
https://osm.org/changeset/153360599

You have ignored these comments and all 13 changeset comments made on your changesets since 2021.

Please remove the political parts of the names.

Thanks,
Zeev
Jobigutenburg (2024-07-14 11:38:34+00:00): Removed.
Syl (2024-07-15 11:09:02+00:00): Bonjour, les chemins que vous avez supprimé sont visibles sur les images aériennes et ont bien l'air d'exister. Si ils sont à accès privé ont peu le préciser et ajouter le portail si il y en a un. A partir du moment où ils existent il n'y a pas de raison de les supprimer.
OpenStreetMap est par exemple utilisé dans certains départements par des services de secours et ce genre d'info est très utile dans ce cas.
N'hésitez pas si vous avez des questions. Bonne journée.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-07-14 21:20:26+00:00): Please stop 
reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153947582
sef43 (2025-06-10 15:32:09+00:00): Hva er mening av way:421751777 highway=residential, proposed=residential?
Noen (2025-06-10 20:19:50+00:00): Høres ut som et lite arbeidsuhell. Begynte å tegne inn en fortsettelse på Nesebyallén som er regulert ned til Tjernsbergveien, men angret meg.
berndw (2024-07-14 07:37:09+00:00): Hallo willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.

Vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag, aber es gibt ein kleines Problem damit ;-)

highway=bridge ist kein zulässiger Wert zum Beschreiben von Wegen.
Hier wäre wohl highway=track, da ein tracktype vorhanden ist, korrekt oder highway=path mit foot=yes| designated  und bicycle=yes| designated falls entsprechend beschildert
berndw (2024-07-14 07:40:56+00:00): Das highway=cycleway entlang der Erft und gegenüber scheint mir auch nicht ganz korrekt, kannst Du etwas dazu sagen?
Udarian (2024-07-13 21:52:36+00:00): crossing:signals=no on crossing=uncontrolled is implied so please stop adding it.
fititnt (2024-07-13 22:50:07+00:00): Olá b_rey952 (e organizadores da atividade #hotosm-project-17084)

Por que você deletou https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/691250987/history? Você tem conhecimento local para afirmar que isso deixou de existir? O `old_name=Estação Ferroviária Corvo` até indica o que estava ali, embora em desuso, ainda existe fisicamente no solo.

E por que você está apagando objetos criados por mapeadores do RS e criando novos objetos? (Exemplo https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/551253987/history -> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1301170853/history)
NeisBot (2024-07-13 21:10:59+00:00): Ooops, it seems that some of your names are a bit unusual ...
Amount=1
#NeisLab
pitscheplatsch (2024-07-16 06:46:05+00:00): ... well.
JezCrow (2024-07-19 00:09:53+00:00): Hi Joseph-97, are you sure this footpath has been removed? It is quite hard to see on Esri imagery, but if it has definitely gone how do you safely access the bus stop now?
Joseph-97 (2024-07-19 00:38:53+00:00): Hi, you can see on Google Street View of the changes, and i believe they was no footpath to begin with as it is a 70mph Dual Carriageway road and not a casual road to pedestrians, also in addition them bus stops are not in service and not used by any services. the link in the middle was closed to traffic also.
BCNorwich (2024-07-15 06:56:20+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Unfortunately your mapping dragged a large area of many features out of alignment. Thus I've reverted the changeset. All is now OK.

The ways that you deleted from the OSM database are mostly genuine features that can be seen on the ground via aerial imagery. A lot are also shown as highways on Ordnance Survey maps. Some are actually public highways.

Please don't remove genuine verifiable features from the OSM database. 

Regards Bernard.
franzhuchel (2024-08-04 13:41:15+00:00): May I ask why you did these changes? The service way on the schoolyard is wrong and the soccer pitch exists.
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2024-08-06 16:20:44+00:00): Sorry, I must not have been able to see the asphalt pitch on the aireal.

But there must be some way or path on the schoolyard. How else would you get to e.g., the tagged entrance?

The existence of removable bollards imply a service way.
franzhuchel (2024-08-07 19:09:30+00:00): There is not really a service way. It's just the schoolyard. Most vehicles park outside of the schoolyard. Only in special occasions, vehicle pass over the schoolyard
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2024-08-08 11:53:33+00:00): then a service way should be tagged with e.g., motor_vehichle=private,emergency=yes
Dāvis Kļaviņš (2024-07-30 20:05:02+00:00): Uzņēmumu reģistrā gan ir ar lielajiem burtiem: https://company.lursoft.lv/lv/enhars/40003544196
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-07-14 21:15:36+00:00): Please stop deleting roads
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153910257
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-07-14 21:16:00+00:00): reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153947462
martianfreeloader (2024-09-16 07:50:09+00:00): Hi,

foot=yes is implied on highway=pedestrian, so we do not usually add this tag.

Happy mapping!
cielak42 (2024-07-14 10:59:43+00:00): Except for the node position, that is.
Geim (2025-03-16 10:09:51+00:00): maxheight=50 :-) Ik vind em leuk:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/162402725/history#map=19/51.405982/5.390408&layers=N
Geim (2025-03-16 10:10:01+00:00): Ik pas het wel aan.
emvee (2025-03-16 11:15:16+00:00): ;-)

Toch maar even verder gekeken en nog twee gevalletjes gevonden:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163683200

Bedankt!
Geim (2025-03-16 14:21:03+00:00): Oh ja, wilde ik nog doen, query draaien met hoogtes > 5 ofzo, of maxspeed < 5
NeisBot (2024-07-13 22:18:38+00:00): Hi Josépb, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 86% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 1 highway(s)
- 16 natural(s)
- 1 waterway(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=153911354
DressyPear4 (2024-07-14 00:09:02+00:00): Revertido! Além das lagoas que foram deletadas, estradas foram transformadas em túneis nos cruzamentos com córregos.
emersonveenstra (2024-07-17 14:11:20+00:00): Hi there,

You created some ways with no tags, could you please go back and tag them? Thanks!
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1301182823
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1301182825#map=19/46.87579/-113.86136
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1301182824
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1301182822
amacmcgrann (2024-07-24 23:16:53+00:00): Done
CurlingMan13 (2024-07-14 09:06:59+00:00): You requested a review of your changeset via the checkbox.  I have reviewed it and have found it to be a good changeset.  keep up the good work.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153911576
Dreisamfuchs (2024-07-17 19:51:30+00:00): Es sah so aus, als hätte der Kiosl dichtgemacht, nun ist er aber wieder geöffnet. Kann die Änderung rückgängig gemacht werden?
NeisBot (2024-07-13 22:29:21+00:00): Ooops, it seems that some of your names are a bit unusual ...
Amount=1
#NeisLab
pitscheplatsch (2024-07-14 06:46:40+00:00): Maybe we should adjust the name or that utilized tag of your modified node?

osm.org/node/12039981943
Yog Sot (2024-07-15 21:12:17+00:00): Ty to sprawdziłeś, że właściciel prywatnego gruntu już pozwala sobie wjeżdżać pod płotem i nie grodzi? Czy w ciemno zmieniłeś?
https://www.google.com/maps/@52.4501607,16.8035879,3a,60y,229.72h,82.19t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sAFMC1t-90ic_eDq208N_fQ!2e0!7i16384!8i8192?coh=205409&entry=ttu
Feskil (2024-07-17 21:14:38+00:00): Teraz rzeczywiście widzę w SIP, że jest to teren prywatny, a nie las komunalny. Poprawię
Yog Sot (2024-07-18 12:58:47+00:00): cały trik polega na tym, że najlepiej jak by ludzie chodzi dalej od jego płotu, czyli mniejwiecej na przeciwko Białoborskiej, no ale niestety mimo sciezki przesunietej mniejwiecej w ten rejon, zbadane dane pokazują, że tych kilka osób, co sie przemieszcza i tak wybieraja tą drogę  w las co jest private niby (bo ta własnosc to nie wiadomo w jakim zakresie jest). 

No i to jest droga, a nie ścieżka, wiec celowo nie mapowałem tej drogi by nia ludzie nie chodzili, tylko by zaczeli chodzic ściezką. 
Niestety facet chyba coś tam grodził nawet w lesie. 

Szkoda, ze zmieniles zamiast zostawic po staremu.
mrkaragoz (2024-07-17 07:15:46+00:00): Please keep your edits localized.
MisturJoesturr (2026-07-18 14:58:38+00:00): Cicilli yakınlarında yolu düz olarak çizmişsin fakat güncel uydu görüntülerinde düz bir yol göremiyorum.
habi (2024-08-20 11:43:27+00:00): Ciao Minster Kanister
Hier hast du bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/771173514/history `wheelchair=ref` hinzugefügt.
Kannst du das in einen sinnvollen Wert (yes/no) umwandeln?
Gruss,
habi
Mister Kanister (2024-08-20 11:51:55+00:00): Hi habi,

oh, klar, da war ich wohl etwas unaufmerksam: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155505128

Danke für den Hinweis!
habi (2024-08-20 14:09:34+00:00): Kein Problem: ich war auf der Suche nach „komischen“ wheelchair-Tags ;)
pkoby (2024-07-16 14:28:59+00:00): Hello, I noticed that you're editing in Philadelphia with Bing Maps as your background. While that is a little more recent, I would suggest you check out the Philadelphia Orthoimagery 2022 (2in) which is higher-resolution and also aligned a little better.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-07-13 23:10:25+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12051893849

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Atlanta502 (2024-07-14 22:40:20+00:00): Zmieniłem na pełną nazwę ulicy
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153949254
Paul Berry (2024-07-14 10:48:58+00:00): № 11 & 12 need adding to street relation.
Paul Berry (2024-08-13 08:06:07+00:00): Resolved on changeset #155182182.
NeisBot (2024-07-13 23:20:38+00:00): Hi Josépb, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 93% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 2 highway(s)
- 14 natural(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=153912650
DressyPear4 (2024-07-14 00:09:10+00:00): Revertido! Além das lagoas que foram deletadas, estradas foram transformadas em túneis nos cruzamentos com córregos.
arctic-rocinante (2024-07-13 23:25:30+00:00): *empty field.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-02-13 22:43:32+00:00): Roads should only be split if there's physical separation.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153912931