piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Langlaeufer (2025-10-15 19:57:52+00:00): gibt es einen eigenen Reitweg daneben oder sollen die Reiter auf den Fuß- oder den Radweg?
Langlaeufer (2025-10-15 19:58:46+00:00): ah, vergiss meinen blöde Frage, das ist ja der Tunnel.
Langlaeufer (2025-10-15 20:04:15+00:00): Ich habe die Verkehrszeichen korrigiert und die Freigabe für radfahrer bis zur Straße verlängert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23010827
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-13 04:06:51+00:00): warto zauważyć że w tej edycji konto Barroszt wycofało https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173144045 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173145565 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173144198 edycje zrobione z konta Barroszt, tego samego

proszę, przestań
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-13 04:07:13+00:00): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:My_little_brother_did_it
marczoutendijk (2026-05-05 08:33:27+00:00): Reverted by: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182238015
YomanNH (2025-10-13 20:12:31+00:00): Ty jesteś największym szkodnikiem.
Barroszt (2025-11-17 11:30:51+00:00): Ale żart xd
Hufkratzer (2025-10-11 20:30:44+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1437155048 is probably just an arena like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1163661282, not a riding center.
NeisBot (2025-10-11 17:06:48+00:00): Hola Juanin23, bienvenido y gracias por tu contribución.

Para facilitar la colaboración y ayudar a los demás a entender tus ediciones, es mejor agregar una breve descripción de los cambios que realizaste. Los comentarios claros ayudan a la comunidad a seguir tu trabajo y proporcionar mejores comentarios. Puedes encontrar consejos para escribir buenos comentarios aquí[1].

Basado en tus ediciones del mapa en este conjunto de cambios, he redactado una sugerencia sobre cómo podría parecerse un comentario: "Agregué café con cocina china, detalles de dirección y característica del lago"
(Auto-translation)
---
Hi Juanin23, welcome and thanks for your contribution!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

Based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Added cafe with Chinese cuisine, address details, and lake feature"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
NeisRevert (2025-10-12 12:43:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173178820
where the changeset comment is: 
Remove testdata
pitscheplatsch (2025-10-13 09:18:31+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM.

Your changeset should be reviewed by the local community.

Thanks.
Ze0zohk1 (2026-06-03 10:00:55+00:00): Hallo knoerk,

access=yes heißt, dass jeglicher Zugang erlaubt ist. D. h. bei einem Pfad z. B. dass auch Autos dort fahren können, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Dyes Du hast das aber teilweise so eingetragen.

Ebenfalls hast du Wege gelöscht. Solange ein Weg existiert, darf/wird er auch in OSM eingetragen. Wenn es Betretungsverbote gibt (z. B. access=no oder bicycle=no oder foot=no), dann muss dieses vor Ort durch ein Schild oder eine Karte nachvollziehbar sein, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:%C3%9Cberpr%C3%BCfbarkeit. Bei einem Naturschutzgebiet kann auch eine PDF mit einer offiziellen Karte hilfreich sein (die man dann z. B. unter note=* eintragen kann).

Ist ein Weg noch vorhanden, aber zugewachsen weil er nicht mehr verwendet wird, verwenden wir in OSM disused:highway oder abandoned:highway, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lebenszyklus-Pr%C3%A4fix#Nutzungaufgabe_und_Verfall. Und erst wenn der Weg nicht mehr erkennbar ist (auch nicht auf Luftbildern), werden Wege gelöscht.

ich habe deine Änderungen deshalb rückgängig gemacht.

Viele Grüße
Peter
Ze0zohk1 (2026-06-03 10:01:29+00:00): revert siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183584171
tomhukins (2025-10-16 17:23:15+00:00): Thank you for all your helpful work on OpenStreetMap.  You have made several edits recently with the identical description "minor fixes".

It would be very helpful for other mappers if you could describe what these fixes involve and why they make sense: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
LordGarySugar (2026-03-18 17:01:16+00:00): Hey, just a note to say I've corrected a few housenames in your previous changesets - where a building has a name, you should use addr:housename= instead of name=.
Secondly, where a bridge has a name, you should not change the name of the road. Instead, add bridge:name=Lesson's Bridge to the section of Colley Lane that is a bridge. If there is a man_made=bridge area drawn, you can add name=Lesson's Bridge to that too. Thanks :)
surreymapadict (2026-04-05 18:46:45+00:00): Hi LordGarySugar.
That's useful. Thanks
marczoutendijk (2026-05-05 08:29:13+00:00): Reverted by: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182237867
NeisBot (2025-10-11 17:03:31+00:00): Hello Juanin23, welcome to OSM, and thank you for your contributions!

I've taken a look at your recent edits and wanted to discuss a few discrepancies I noticed regarding the surrounding environmental features. Specifically, the locations in your edits don't seem to align with the typical geographical characteristics expected in that area. Here are some (max 10) relevant links to the edits:
https://osm.org/way/1437156903

Could you please take a look?
Looking forward to your response.

#Somewhere
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=173146962
NeisRevert (2025-10-12 12:43:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173178841
where the changeset comment is: 
Remove testdata
RushMM (2025-10-11 17:17:32+00:00): Amazing thanks
eggie (2025-10-11 17:07:35+00:00): Nog even opgezocht.. 
Bij fitness is de tag 
leisure=fitness_centre

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dfitness_centre
NeisBot (2025-10-11 17:09:36+00:00): Hello Juanin23, welcome to OSM, and thank you for your contributions!

I've taken a look at your recent edits and wanted to discuss a few discrepancies I noticed regarding the surrounding environmental features. Specifically, the locations in your edits don't seem to align with the typical geographical characteristics expected in that area. Here are some (max 10) relevant links to the edits:
https://osm.org/way/1437371198
https://osm.org/way/1437371199
https://osm.org/way/1437371200
https://osm.org/way/1437371201
https://osm.org/way/1437371202

Could you please take a look?
Looking forward to your response.

#Somewhere
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=173147147
NeisRevert (2025-10-12 12:43:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173178789
where the changeset comment is: 
Remove testdata
habi (2025-10-11 17:24:40+00:00): Mersi, ich hab' das aus dem Zug gesehen und wollte das Zuhause mit JOSM zusammenführen...
Piagno (2025-10-11 18:00:43+00:00): Kein Problem, war schnell gemacht :)
marczoutendijk (2026-05-05 08:27:24+00:00): Reverted by: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182237805
cpm01 (2025-10-11 17:28:56+00:00): Business is a:
Thrift Shop
for children's goods.
Clothing,
Toys,
sports equipment
Prams,
etc

Category Toy Store doesn't really fit

Further

Occupys 2 bays in strip mall

&
I am unable to edit the larger of the 2 bays

Not sure how to offer more information
SüdWest_Kartologe (2025-10-11 19:02:18+00:00): Diese Änderung hat den Fluss "Saalach" in "Siezenheimer Steg" umbenannt. Sicherlich ein Versehen, ich mach die Namensänderung rückgängig
mosaico (2025-10-11 19:09:08+00:00): Oh, Entschuldigung, ja natürlich, ich wollte den Siezenheimer Steg wieder sichtbar machen, nachdem der neue Steg heute eröffnet wurde. Dank.e.
A67-A67 (2025-10-26 19:20:46+00:00): Teruggedraaid vanwege verwijderen en terugplaatsen place-node.
RodrigoVi (2025-10-19 08:41:36+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:cycleway:both indique que `cycleway:both=no` permet d'indiquer explicitement que la valeur s'applique aux deux sens plutôt que d'utiliser à la fois cycleway:left=* et cycleway:right=* avec la même valeur.
Il était donc inutile d'ajouter `cycleway:right=no`
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-23 02:54:44+00:00): reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 remain not answered

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173652989
gscholz (2026-03-06 09:17:47+00:00): Hi Nesim,
this collection is not a valid relation:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=33.60894&lat=38.10371&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
A67-A67 (2025-10-26 19:20:31+00:00): Teruggedraaid vanwege verwijderen en terugplaatsen place-node.
A67-A67 (2025-10-26 19:20:19+00:00): Teruggedraaid vanwege verwijderen en terugplaatsen place-node.
Langlaeufer (2025-10-13 19:24:11+00:00): tagging von fahrradstraßen https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:bicycle_road%3Dyes
ich berichtige es.
Grüße Langläufer
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173149809
YourLocalEnbyMapper (2025-10-12 15:00:21+00:00): There seems to be an issue with the changeset, as I never intended to edit anything in the top part of it
SzymonH (2025-10-12 05:52:31+00:00): Pętla Banacha jeszcze pozostaje zamknięta, więc przywrócenie railway=tram jest nieprawidłowe.
Anas masuris (2025-10-12 10:00:05+00:00): Zaraz to skoryguję, bo jeszcze oddany do użytku będzie BW 1920 04
fortera_au (2025-11-10 03:21:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 174443403 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: incompatible source
notmyproblem1 (2025-10-11 18:46:37+00:00): scusatemi per il big changeset
Matt McCutchen (2025-10-11 19:16:29+00:00): I think this restriction was left over from the temporary closure of westbound Randolph Road in 2021-2022.  I have on hand a track from 2025-08-02 that shows that I took the turn in question; I think that's sufficient evidence that it's no longer restricted.
rarad74 (2025-10-11 20:06:56+00:00): Hi Is not ok to split a park in many segments. The name could be applied only to a segment. The rest of the splitted segment will remain without a name. You cannot name all with the same name. So for parks is better to remain a single poligon with paths drawed over.
rarad74 (2025-10-11 20:07:45+00:00): Now i read again an you segmented the wood part, not the park. Sorry.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-11 19:40:54+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13226531612

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
BCNorwich (2025-10-12 06:24:26+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The pub is already mapped as Way: Sussex Arms (311904776) and Relation: The Sussex Arms (8757463). Thus I've added your data to the building outline.

Regards Bernard.
dypa (2025-10-22 15:22:47+00:00): При указании размеченных не регулируемых пешеходных переходов нельзя использовать тег crossing=zebra, см https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:crossing=zebra

Пожалуйста при внесении следующих правок используйте теги (Размеченный (нерегулируемый) пешеходный переход)
crossing=uncontrolled
crossing:markings=zebra

Заранее спасибо!
SekeRob (2025-10-13 07:54:59+00:00): Ciao Simone,
I nome del strads tra I fonte e sul segna...
https://d2exd72xrrp1s7.cloudfront.net/www/16/16tozw31jxb2sdwpmoy0z622v5id5pcjl-p637526392-full/1991fc3b5ae?width=3072&height=2304&crop=false&q=70

Buona Mappatura
SomeoneElse2 (2025-10-13 20:40:11+00:00): Hello,
You've removed https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/863329639#map=20/51.3219246/-0.5583903 (which was part of a cycle route) here.  Has that parallel cycleway really been removed?  Must cyclists now either push their bikes on the pavement or cycle along the road?
Best Regards,
Andy
Frans S (2025-10-19 09:07:07+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping. 
A remark. 
Traces (tracks) inbetween farmland , not connected to settlements ought to be mapped as highway=track.
Best regards and keep mapping
b-jazz (2025-10-12 01:37:55+00:00): RE: the area around https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13205320063

When drawing golf course areas (such as greens, fairways, bunkers, tees, etc.), please be aware that the ways used to outline those areas can't cross over each other. Fairway outlines shouldn't cross over greens or bunkers or other fairways for example. In the case above where you have a rough next to another rough, all of the nodes at the border should be shared between each rough. If you could go back and clean up where you've made this mistake, that would be helpful. But more importantly, if you could stop from doing this in the future, it would be greatly appreciated. Please read the wiki for instructions and examples of how to better map golf courses: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls. If you have any questions about golf course mapping, feel free to reach out.
b-jazz (2025-10-12 01:44:49+00:00): You made some changes to the green at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/685037079. It used to be a multipolygon with a fringe defined by the outer way/fringe and the green. But somehow the fairway was deleted and the relation between the two is "broken". Not sure what the purpose of the change was. Sometimes you see people deleting a feature entirely and then re-adding it from scratch and wind up with this situation, but that doesn't appear to be the case here. 

I'm starting to write a wiki article about how to handle multipolygon relations and golf course mapping, but it doesn't directly match this case, but maybe you'll find it useful how to deal with relations in iD (which can be confusing).

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ID_understanding_golf_course_relations
wadenick (2025-10-12 04:55:31+00:00): I'm not quite sure what you mean on this one. The prior fairway on hole 1 is still in place, I defined the rough, and I deleted the name=blahblah from the putting green (I saw this debate on another golf course, such features shouldn't all be named as it's similarly redundant as pins). I can help fix things I've broken but the relationship problem is a bit unclear to me in this case. There's probably more... I've been adding rough and deleting green name="xyzzy" properties on this course today.
wadenick (2025-10-12 16:38:47+00:00): Actually the more I look at the mapping of this course the weirder it becomes. The fairways seem too small. I am not sure how to update it for the best here, would be interested in your thoughts overall.
wadenick (2025-10-12 19:43:03+00:00): Well, confirming while there today for kids' golf coaching lessons. This is hole 1 - it's tightly cropped rough but the fairway does finish well in front of the green and the green is ringed by a defined fringe. Second shot is from the tee ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ https://imgur.com/a/BD5BAGD
wadenick (2025-10-12 23:58:30+00:00): OK I _think_ I might have corrected the fairway / putting green relationship on hole 1 here. Would you let me know if I've got it right? I'm mapping another local course and ready to get those relationships right.
Byenin (2025-11-28 08:01:19+00:00): Hello jbcharron
 Thank you for mapping!
 I Removed tunnel=yes tag.
 Please inspect your task carefully before closing.
 Happy Mapping!
Comino (2025-10-12 09:31:43+00:00): Hi Liongrass,

You deleted a lot of data from POI “Mood - Café & Spätkauf”, and left two tags:

check_date:currency:XBT=2023-10-24
currency:XBT=yes

Has the merchant closed shop and need the two tags to go too?

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
https://btcmap.org/tagger/6794624
Liongrass (2025-10-12 11:11:19+00:00): Hi Comino,
Thank you for noticing. You're right, the business is closed and I meant to remove all tags. I will attempt again!
Deftax (2025-10-11 21:24:19+00:00): Jeżeli chodzi o zagospodarowanie terenu, to będę usuwać "duży" obszar mieszkalny i zastępować go wieloma mniejszymi (tak jak powinno być), więc jeśli chodzi o ten duży obszar to przez następny ok. tydzień mogą tam być różnego rodzaju chwilowe niedokładności, które zostaną wyeliminowane po podziale całego obszaru na mniejsze (po prostu to trochę wszystko zajmuje).
Graptemys (2025-10-11 21:29:01+00:00): Found an article about it: https://www.chmafm.com/welcome/landmark-visitor-info-building-in-aulac-torn-down-by-dti-after-unanswered-enquiries-from-tantramar-2/
felipeeugenio (2025-10-11 22:53:34+00:00): Hola. Si bien las casas están todas bien dibujadas aparentemente, hay unas uno metros delante de otras, varias están desalineadas.

Para corregir eso puedes tirar una línea provisoria que conecte los frontis y las partes traseras de las casas para que se conserve la recta. Luego eliminas la línea.

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173156681
YomanNH (2025-10-13 09:47:27+00:00): To nie jest Osiedle "Na Stoku", tylko Osiedle Na Stoku.
YomanNH (2025-10-13 09:47:47+00:00): Z Osiedlem Na Wzgórzach tak samo.
SuborbitalPigeon (2025-10-11 22:31:15+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173157953
AndyB_66 (2025-10-16 15:57:57+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
tastrax (2025-10-15 11:08:48+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, +61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features#Phone_Numbers .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
Ulle G (2025-10-13 12:12:48+00:00): Lähetän viestin Puolustuskiinteistöille, hekään eivät ole varmoja rajoista ja lupasivat tarkistaa asian.
kupteri (2025-10-13 14:36:50+00:00): Ainakin mitä tuolla maastossa liikkuessa näkee esteitä, portteja ja kylttejä ainoastaan tuonne taisteluampuma-alueelle kielletään menemästä. Tuo muu alue on varmaan puolustusvoimien omistamaa mutta siellä menee paljon hyvin maahan kuluneita polkuja missä ihmiset liikkuu jatkuvasti, niin pyöräilijöitä kuin marjastajia ja koiranulkoiluttajia. Jos se olisi kiellettyä, siihen olisi puututtu ja kylttejä olisi joka puolella. Nyt niitä on vain ton "salmiakin" sivuilla joka puolella varoittamassa.
kupteri (2025-10-13 14:40:11+00:00): https://maavoimat.fi/en/-/maavoimien-ampuma-ja-harjoitusalueet

"Taisteluampumapaikan rajat on merkitty maastoon erikokoisilla kylteillä. Teiden ja polkujen suunnissa liikkumisrajoitukset ilmaistaan varoitustauluilla, joita alueella liikkuvien tulee ehdottomasti noudattaa. Taisteluampumapaikan rajat on merkitty maastoon sinivalkoisella rengastuksella puihin.

Alueella on viisi vakioitua vartiopaikkaa ja viisi kiinteää puomia. Yleensä ammunnoissa käytetään vakioituja vartiopaikkoja, jotka estävät liikenteen ammuntojen ollessa käynnissä."
Ulle G (2025-10-14 14:34:55+00:00): https://www.omas.fi/@Bin/728508/Hiukkavaaran+johtos%C3%A4%C3%A4nt%C3%B6+2022.pdf
Ulle G (2025-10-14 14:36:31+00:00): Olen samaa mieltä arvionne kanssa, katso uusimmat säännöt linkistä. Näyttää siltä, että ne rajoittuvat taistelu- ja ampuma-alueelle.
mueschel (2025-10-12 17:11:41+00:00): Hi,
some buildings got a strange 'Unit' tag. Could you check that?
Tex2002ans (2025-10-14 06:49:33+00:00): Yes, thanks for spotting that.

I fixed it in next changelog:

- https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173207717
HantDX (2025-10-12 08:56:30+00:00): Вдоль пр. Партизанского в этих местах велодорожки конструктивно не отделены и представляют собой единое целое с пешеходной дорожкой, разве что местами разделены с ней  разметкой. В таком случае не нужно рисовать отдельные highway=cycleway, достаточно добавить на имеющиеся дорожки bicycle=designated и segregated=yes (если разделены разметкой) или segregated=no (если общее пространство для велосипедов и пешеходов).
kelianor (2025-10-12 11:03:29+00:00): Спасибо! Буду знать :)
SOSOwner (2025-10-11 23:41:07+00:00): And the bustimes.org links...
https://bustimes.org/services/c7-chelmsford-bus-stn-galleywood-watchouse-rd-keen#map
https://bustimes.org/services/c57-chelmsford-bus-stn-galleywood-watchouse-rd-kee#map
https://bustimes.org/services/c8-chelmsford-bus-station-north-springfield-beauli#map
https://bustimes.org/services/c9-chelmsford-bus-station-university-beaulieu-cent#map
https://bustimes.org/services/c11-chelmsford-rail-statiion-north-springfield-spr#map
https://bustimes.org/services/73-chelmsford-maldon-via-hatfield-peverel-nounsley#map
https://bustimes.org/services/73a-maldon-heybridge-basin-nounsley-hatfield-pever#map
SOSOwner (2025-10-11 23:42:11+00:00): (Ignore the larger than normal changeset area. Some additional routes had modified operator tags. Roads mentioned in the changeset are in or around Beaulieu Park.)
NeisBot (2025-10-12 01:27:21+00:00): Hi skladasljkd, welcome and thanks for your contribution!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

Based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Added lighting masts with freestanding construction, street lamps, and updated direction details"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Glassman (2025-10-12 20:05:07+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173160607
Glassman (2025-10-12 20:06:07+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.

#TIP: Not sure what imagery you used, but ESRI World Imagery is the most current and shows both buildings.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173160607
user_5359 (2025-10-13 10:46:40+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1441542590. What is the mean of the tag paera=yes? 

Please note that the key area is not used in the key building because it is already included in the term.
nona mostafa (2025-10-13 12:19:50+00:00): Hi youmadrir123@,
I noticed that some recent edits added the tag (oneway=yes) to certain streets.
However, based on the Vantor satellite imagery (via Vantor Hub, dated 2025-10-06), and (Esri World Imagery), it is clear that vehicles are moving in both directions on these roads.
Examples:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/249065134,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1435975839,
and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1257341285
Also, adding road direction tags has resulted in some floating roads (roads not connected properly).
Examples:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/857533207
and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/857533208
In addition, making some modifications to the streets does not exactly match any image.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1441542902
and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1441542901
Could you please review these edits and correct them?
Best regards,
nona mostafa