piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
osmuser63783 (2024-07-25 22:07:27+00:00): Hi! Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap. You requested a review on your changeset so I have had a look. You changed access=destination for this road to access=private. access=destination is for when the only people allowed to walk or drive down the road are visitors trying to reach the school, e.g. to drop off a child or to make a delivery. Access=private is for when walking or driving down this road is only possible by permission (e.g. if it's only for staff).

I noticed that the southern part of the road at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/5324370 is not marked as private. Should it be marked as private too?
KLG28 (2024-07-26 06:32:10+00:00): Hi, thanks for checking. Sounds like it should be access=destination then. With regards to the southern section of that road, most of it - the section from where it meets the northern section to the gate should be access=destination. I am not sure about the small section from the gate to where it meets Barnton Avenue West. I would need to double check when next passing.
woodpeck_repair (2024-06-17 14:09:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152805446 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism
woodpeck_repair (2024-06-17 14:09:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152805446 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism
woodpeck_repair (2024-06-17 14:09:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152805446 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism
woodpeck_repair (2024-06-17 14:09:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152805446 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism
woodpeck_repair (2024-06-17 14:09:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152805446 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism
woodpeck_repair (2024-06-17 14:09:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152805446 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism
literan (2024-06-17 17:13:56+00:00): не надо писать слово "деревня" в тег addr:city (этот тег вообще лишний, можете его не заполнять)
CurlingMan13 (2024-06-17 21:00:35+00:00): edit matches aerial imagery.  :)
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152805376
woodpeck_repair (2024-06-17 14:09:10+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 152805149, 152805150, 152805152, 152805154, 152805155, 152805156, 152805159, 152805161, 152805162, 152805164, 152805165, 152805166, 152805167, 152805168, 152805171, 152805172, 152805173, 152805174, 152805175, 152805177, 152805178, 152805179, 152805180, 152805181, 152805184, 152805186, 152805187, 152805189, 152805191, 152805192, 152805194, 152805195, 152805197, 152805198, 152805200, 152805202, 152805203, 152805215.
Leo Slager (2024-06-17 19:18:42+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Friendly_Ghost (2024-06-18 00:28:10+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152824147
woodpeck_repair (2024-06-18 19:55:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152864464 where the changeset comment is: revert Gaza edits by a sock puppet account created to circumvent a user block
nand95 (2024-06-17 14:18:06+00:00): Podernuovo volevo dire, non Pordenuovo
Marrel (2024-10-09 22:02:24+00:00): Hello!

I've noticed, as part of this changeset, the block added on the private road that links Rue Riopelle and Rue du Passage. I saw no such block on my first survey of that road; I surveyed again today (October 9th 2024) and again saw no block on the road, so I took the initiative to remove it.

I thought it would be courteous to notify you about it.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2024-10-09 22:15:12+00:00): Thanks! Perfect! I updated the alignement with the new Mapbox aerial photos.
Frans S (2024-06-18 10:38:21+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
When you map high rise buildings, move the mapped rooflines to the footprint.
Best regards
damianeue (2024-06-17 14:27:03+00:00): mistake: added turning limitations, water areas, solar farms - fixed roundabouts geometry
Frans S (2024-06-18 07:53:02+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. However, not always squared.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152806446
Martin Constantino–Bodin (2024-06-17 14:40:47+00:00): Ces changements sont la suite de celui-ci : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152795292
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-31 18:09:32+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11987679509/history has fixme:type = shop that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What kind of shop is here?

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop for common values - is any of them fitting?
Tatti Barletta (2024-06-18 07:12:04+00:00): Ciao, sto provando a farmi un'idea dalla wiki ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:route#Tags ) e mi sembra di capire che il tag route=* sia obbligatorio assieme a type=route. Come mai li stai rimuovendo da tute queste relazioni?
granpasso811 (2024-06-18 09:50:22+00:00): Ciao, dopo alcune escursioni sul campo e dopo aver verificato i percorsi ufficiali del CAI di Pistoia nella RET, ho riscontrato che alcuni sentieri risultavano segnati con numerazioni e/o segnavia non ufficiali e non riscontrati. In attesa di ulteriori verifiche ho preferito non rimuoverli ma semplicemente eliminare quel tag in modo che non compaiano ingannevolmente su renderer con Waymarked Trails.
granpasso811 (2024-06-18 09:51:50+00:00): Nella fattispecie il MPT è in abbandono da numerosi anni e, anche se qua e là rimangono in piedi alcuni cartelli, non è di fatto manutenuto. Ho aggiunto invece le tappe mancanti del Cammino di San Bartolomeo che è invece segnato sul terreno con strisce gialle.
Tatti Barletta (2024-06-18 10:07:22+00:00): Ah capisco, ha senso. Immagino sia una precisazione superflua, ma se e quando riesci a confermare non farti problemi ed elimina pure.
SomeoneElse (2024-06-17 15:18:21+00:00): Hello VLD300,
While the previous name:en for https://osm.mapki.com/history/node/4027452036 was an unlikely one it's a bit of a stretch to say that an important place doesn't have an English name at all.  
What was the reason that you removed it?
I'd be interested to know what your sources for current status and name is.  It's actually probably worth discussing over at the forum.  Two communities claim this region as "theirs"; following a war one is currently in control.  There will no doubt be be argument on the forum about who _ought_ to control and name this area; but information about the on-the-ground status may be harder to come by.
Best Regards,
Andy
VLD300 (2024-06-18 16:00:26+00:00): Hello SomeoneElse,

Thank you for reaching out to me about this issue. I went ahead and removed the English tag because the language used in the English tag was not English. I was unsure if I should translate the name "Stepanakert" into the English tag or not since an alternative name tag was already present. What would you recommend, should I revert back into the previous changeset, add the "Stepanakert" name, or leave as is since there is already an alternative name tag for "Stepanakert"? I do see on the wiki tag the name "Stepanakert" is present for English however. Thank you again for reaching out to me, and I look forward to hearing back from you!
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-06-21 22:54:15+00:00): Please explain what you did in changeset comments and provide sources for changes not visible on aerial imagery.
Frans S (2024-06-18 07:55:58+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. However, 1 (out of 2) building not squared 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152807906
Adaru (2024-06-17 16:35:56+00:00): True
Jordi MF (2024-06-17 16:41:55+00:00): Hola IWBRABANT,

Si te fijas, el acueducto ya está mapeado: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/499665259 y https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/499665258.

Por lo tanto, no tiene sentido añadir nuevos nodos que hagan referencia al acueducto. Los elimino y gracias por mejorar OSM.

Saludos.
Tomas_J (2024-07-08 05:59:59+00:00): Ahoj.  Access permit znamená vjazd povolený každému.  Pozri Wiki.  T.
mcliquid (2024-06-24 10:34:45+00:00): Hi and thank you for your contribution!

Please note for the future: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
miluethi (2024-06-17 16:24:10+00:00): Hi Jobanh,

99% of all buildings are square. Please square out buildings with iD editor. Please don't add odd shaped buildings. I'm going to delete them.

Thank you
felipeeugenio (2024-06-18 13:52:07+00:00): otro tema sobre las edificaciones:
1) pueden ser cuadradas con la letra Q. Se ve que está dejando polígonos genéricos donde hay estructuras. pero hay que dibujar la base.
2) addr:street= es la calle
addr:housenumber= es el numero
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152809492
mcliquid (2024-06-24 10:33:57+00:00): Hi and thank you for your contribution!

Please note for the future: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
okainov (2024-06-24 10:38:55+00:00): @mcliquid ok, thanks for the heads-up, sorry for inconvenience!
Khidistavi (2024-06-18 12:55:17+00:00): reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152846645#map=12/39.8275/46.7520
Lezurex (2024-06-17 19:51:00+00:00): Hallo Repower CMC,

Bitte keine beschreibenden Namen verwenden. Dass eine amenity=charging_station eine Ladestation ist, ist offensichtlich. Daher ist der Zusatz "Ladestation" im Namen überflüssig.

Auch die description bringt hier genau 0 Zusatzinformation, da sie identisch mit dem Namen ist. Daher bitte weglassen.

(Selbiges gilt auch für deine anderen Changesets)

LG Lezurex
Lezurex (2024-06-17 19:57:14+00:00): Ausserdem: Wie mir scheint (ich war nicht vor Ort), wird diese Ladestation hier von Energie Opfikon AG betrieben. Darum wäre operator=Energie Opfikon AG, nicht Plug'n'Roll, was das Ladenetzwerk ist, und darum ja in network und ggf. brand spezifiziert wird.
VLD316 (2024-07-12 20:08:57+00:00): Hello there cnvery!
I noticed that you named this building as “Illegal House”.
Are you able to provide more information about this addition?
Thank you and have a good day!
-Nick
cnvery (2024-12-11 08:27:42+00:00): For those building plotted as "Illegal House", the information unable to found it in https://cps.dbkl.gov.my/public/map/utama/index.html?config=gunatanah

It seems those "Illegal House" name already removed. Is this done by you?
VLD075 (2024-12-11 17:36:55+00:00): Hello cnvery,

Thanks for getting back to us! After further investigation it looks like another user removed the name "Illegal House" from the feature.
DaveF (2024-06-23 09:01:17+00:00): Hi

Please don't delete valid PROWs
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/162848989

Creating a MP relation with two outers is unnecessary.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17729757
Benjwri (2024-06-23 10:59:59+00:00): Hi, apologies re the PROW, the PROW has just been legally diverted to the other side of the hedge line, although I do notice the council has been slow uploading documents as such. I have readied tags to the footpath which I originally forgot.
Benjwri (2024-06-23 11:00:36+00:00): Re the relation certainly wasn't intentional, not sure how that appeared.
DaveF (2024-06-23 11:44:20+00:00): Hi
What documentation do you have regarding the decision of the PROW? BANES still list it as a TBC.
Glyphes (2024-06-17 17:00:06+00:00): Edit over whole Europe?
Metzor (2024-06-17 20:05:00+00:00): Hi Jen_T,

Lôo refers to this general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: 

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

 Why? Have a look at the section 
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Note that you can upload your changes one by one in OSMand to avoid geographically huge changesets! 

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
mga_geo (2024-06-25 17:00:09+00:00): Bonsoir,
La ligne de bus r13436722 est cassée suite à ces modifications.
Marc
Lyon-St-Clair (2024-06-25 20:32:33+00:00): bonjour, j'ai refais le parcours et en effet elle était codée dans les deux sens au lieu d'un seul à un endroit.
Lezurex (2024-06-17 19:42:26+00:00): Hi x3k6a2,

Thanks for your contributions so far.

Out of curiosity: Is the 10 kph speed limit actually signed? If not, it should not be tagged as such.

In your changeset description you wrote about the street being private, but you tagged it as destination, which corresponds to the "ausgenommen Zubringerdienst" appendix on a sign. If it's a private street, it should be tagged as private.

Any questions, don't hesitate to ask.

Lezurex
aduxas (2024-07-24 21:15:23+00:00): The ways in this area do not match the OSM definition of foot paths ("A path mainly or exclusively for pedestrians").  More importantly, they are all located inside Plot 022-108 , which is a privately owned parcel.  As such, all access tags should be private.
silversurfer83 (2024-06-17 20:12:18+00:00): Moin Sven :)

du hast darum gebeten, dass sich jemand deine Änderung ansieht. Ich mach das mal.

Zunächst mal das Drumherum:
Deine Kommentar ist leider wenig hilfreich und die Quellenangabe nicht vorhanden. Das macht die Interpretation einer Änderung immer etwas schwierig. Daher wäre es schön, wenn du
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
beachten würdest. Danke.

Die Änderung selbst: Ich unterstelle einfach, dass du dich vor Ort auskennst und dann ist das vollkommen in Ordnung, wenn du einen Punkt an die richtigte Stelle schiebst.

Weiter viel Spaß
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152814088
Lezurex (2024-06-17 19:03:46+00:00): Hallo wwjd2022,

Ich muss sagen, ein einzelner Node mit place=locality finde ich dafür unpassend.

So wie ich verstanden habe, ist der offizielle (und vmtl. auch ausgeschilderte) Name "Unterführung Nord" und, der einheimische Name "Milchrampe". Für mich also ein klassischer Fall für name und loc_name. Aber nicht auf einem Node, sondern auf der ganzen Fläche (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/380044860), da ja die ganze Unterführung gemeint ist, richtig?

Lass mich wissen, ob meine Interpretation da korrekt ist :D

LG Lezurex
wwjd2022 (2024-06-18 18:56:11+00:00): Hallo Lezurex

Herzlichen Dank für die rasche Anmerkung! 
Gerne lerne ich mehr über OSM. 
Ich stimme Dir zu, dass "Hauptbahnhof Winterthur Unterführung Nord" besser zur Fläche (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/380044860) passt. Doch Milchrampe ist mehr der spezifische Ort vor/um die Treppe, der als bekannter Treffpunkt gilt (https://community.sbb.ch/d/3247-winterthurer-bahnhof-unterf%C3%BChrung-nord-in-michrampe-umbenennen). Somit würde ich diesen Node lassen, entsprechend https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aplace%3Dlocality#Germany. Was meinst Du?

LG wwjd

PS: Damit ich noch mehr lerne, wie hast Du so schnell diesen changeset gesehen?
Lezurex (2024-06-18 21:33:33+00:00): Hallo wwjd2022,

Ich kann mich nur auf Onlineartikel dazu beziehen, bin kein einheimischer Winterthurer :D

Hier zum Beispiel wird die gesamte Unterführung als "Milchrampe" bezeichnet: https://www.toponline.ch/news/thurgau/news/winterthurer-milchrampe-wird-zur-bruecke-0083888/

Bist du aus der Gegend und kannst das persönlich besser beurteilen? Ich denke, die Interpretationen variieren auch ein wenig.

place=locality ist für ländliche Gebiete gedacht, um Gebiete zu benennen, die nicht genau definiert sind (bspw. Hügel).

Wie ich auf dein Changeset gekommen bin: Ich schaue mir regelmässig alle neuen Changesets im Kanton Zürich mit OSMCha durch, damit hier nichts kaputtgeht. Besonders neuen Mappern passiert es öfter mal, dass sie bspw. aus Versehen irgendwelche Nodes in der Weltgeschichte rumverschieben :D

LG Lezurex
RCRalph (2024-06-24 08:37:45+00:00): Wygląda na to, że przy okazji przeniosłeś też lokalizację stacji Kraków Grzegórzki :3
felipeeugenio (2024-06-17 18:26:53+00:00): Hola Richard
Estamos viendo las aceras que borraste en fotos de la zona. por favor conectate al chat para hablar.
saludos
mini-me (2024-06-17 18:45:09+00:00): 1. Ни с каких Booking services, ни с Google копировать нельзя.
2. Сайт ourhotel.store не имеет отношения к добавляемым гостиницам. Выглядит как прокладка для реферальных ссылок.
Не надо так.
Fedor Filimonov (2024-06-17 20:18:53+00:00): Спасибо за заботу!
1. Данные не копируются с Букинга и прочих - это открытые данные, по сути они идентичны на сотнях сайтов: Адрес, звёзды и прочая общая информация - то, что публикуют отели, регистрируясь на в сервисах бронирования. Гугл и локальные поисковики помогают найти живой сайт объекта. Так ими можно пользоваться.
2. Там, где у объекта нет живого сайта, всё равно как дать возможность пользователю забронировать гостиницу. Вот соседняя правка, у них сайт свой нормальный есть https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11988067842
mini-me (2024-06-17 22:23:32+00:00): 1. Открытые они только на официальном сайте. Копирование этих же данных из базы букинга почти наверняка запрещено условиями сервиса. Короче, не стоит указывать подобные источники.
2. Тег website только для официального сайта. Есть website:booking, но ourhotel.store - это даже не сервис бронирования. Все ссылки однозначно на удаление.
woodpeck (2024-06-17 23:32:13+00:00): Fedor, your logic is flawed, You cannot take data from booking sites just because the hotels have freely added this data to booking sites. Also, you keep adding "ourhotels.com" links even though you were asked not to. I am sorry but I have to remove your edits now.
Vinber-Pro (2024-06-20 15:44:51+00:00): merci, je croyais l'avoir passé en revue :(
woodpeck (2024-06-17 22:44:59+00:00): Dear aleksielias, welcome to OSM! It is customary to add a short comment describing your edits when you upload - not just ".". See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments for details. Your future contributions would be even more welcome if you could add such a comment.
kapazao (2024-12-12 12:11:15+00:00): Hola, no entiendo por qué has puesto que por aquí irá el tranvía si están puestas las vías en construcción en la vía al otro lado del río.
Si es cosa de que el camino está cortado por bastante tiempo simpremente sería añadir access=no sin cambiar el tipo de vía.
Ya lo he corregido
Un saludo
rohieb (2025-06-24 12:12:55+00:00): People say that these glyphs cannot be seen on the ground, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3328198
Tagging as man_made=geoglyph + barrier=wall + height=0 also seems contradictive to me, like <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mapping_for_the_renderer>
Dafo43 (2025-06-24 14:17:12+00:00): Yes, it is visable from the ground. If I added the fields in question then its likely copied from one of the other Eire signs.
VictorIE (2025-06-24 14:29:13+00:00): rohieb, just because something isn't visible from the air / space doesn't mean it doesn't exist. :)
rohieb (2025-06-24 15:18:37+00:00): See the linked note, people have reported that it cannot be seen on the ground.
Dafo43 (2025-06-24 15:26:56+00:00): well I was there and I saw it...
Jordi MF (2024-06-17 21:46:13+00:00): Se han revertido todos los changesets de este usuario porque es un usuario bloqueado decenas de veces con cuentas múltiples (https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/usuarios-editando-en-espana-bajo-sospecha-vandalismo-malas-practicas-y-otros/2510/), por lo que sistemáticamente incumple los Términos de Uso de OSM (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenStreetMap_account#Account_Names_and_Multi_Account_Policies y https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Terms_of_Use#VI._Account_cancellation_or_suspension).
El usuario realiza múltiples y pequeñas ediciones para dificultar que sus cambios puedan ser revisados. Los mayores errores son que modifica la toponimia oficial para que no aparezca en valenciano aunque así lo dictamine la Acadèmia Valenciana de la Llengua en la cartografía oficial de la Comunitat Valenciana. Tenemos permiso explícito de esta entidad que, según las leyes autonómicas, es la entidad encargada de la toponimia oficial. Tampoco no tiene en cuenta la cartelería local que aparece en calles, carreteras y sendas.
Por otra parte, este usuario (y todas sus cuentas) está mapeando según las ortofotos y sin tener en cuenta el conocimiento local para delimitar si los elementos se tratan de edificios en ruinas, muros u otros elementos e, incluso, elimina PDIs con todo el historial de forma injustificada.
Ante todo lo expuesto y por las diversas anomalías, revierto todos los changesets porque, de revisar cada uno de ellos, únicamente nos dedicaríamos a ello, como si fuésemos administradores. En caso de revisar todas las ediciones de este usuario que ya ha sido bloqueado por 10 años con otras cuentas, nunca podríamos seguir mejorando la base de datos debido a revisar durante horas cada uno de los conjuntos de cambios y, por lo tanto, dejaríamos de lado seguir mapeando para añadir nueva información.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152821220