piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
N9713 (2023-08-21 18:41:41+00:00): Um ehrlich zu sein, wollte ich die Flächen nicht direkt löschen, damit die Historie für eine gewisse Zeit einfach nachvollziehbar bleibt. Gravel war das einzige tag, das mir behaltenswert erschien. Nur eben nicht als roof:material, sondern als surface. Das ist ja auch erstmal nicht falsch, aber die genaue Form/Ausdehnung der Flächen könnte halt präziser sein. Mit etwas zeitlichem Abstand können sie von mir aus jetzt aber auch gelöscht werden, sofern sie in der Form keinen Mehrwert bringen.
Frans S (2023-01-18 09:28:23+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
A: Buildings not accurate drawn
C: Collecting multiple buildings and mapped as 1 building.
E: buildings are not squared. (none of them)
I reviewed other changesets you issued over the last 6 month and noticed that all your mappings are of a poor quality. 
Please improve your mapping skills.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131398926
RedAuburn (2023-10-23 19:22:26+00:00): are there any tools you used to do this? it's amazing!
Cebderby (2023-10-23 20:15:52+00:00): Thanks.  Had done some sliced buildings before and plenty of other (not-so-)simple 3d buildings in OSM.  No purpose made tools for making OSM 3d buildings, but I used a 3d CAD program 'OpenSCAD' (which uses a 'programmed geometry' approach rather than a more conventional drawing tool) to make an ideal (not achievable in OSM) model matching to photos and ground survey (for near-ground details and height estimates for these eg the loading area and pods relative to the riverside ground, plus did my own measurement of the outer diameter by standing under it and noting ground positions).  Then I played with slicing the wheel and A-frame in OpenSCAD until I had a reasonable accuracy vs complexity compromise, and wrote out coords (x,y,z metres) for all the slice corner points.  (Did some geometry roughly by hand in JOSM and saved the resulting file to see the format etc.)  Imported all the calculated coords into a spreadsheet to rotate it to match the riverbank angle and convert to lat,long & z height and output as near as I could to a JOSM text file with node and way ids etc etc.  Some search and replace with a text editor to finish off, if I remember correctly, then loaded to JOSM to review with Kendzi3d-dev plugin, and repeat until satisfied.  Did some manual adjustment of the 'roof' slope angles for the lowest part of the wheel I think.  Then lots of checking in JOSM then finally uploaded wheel, A frame+axle and all the ground fixed stuff.  It's a monster, and slicing a triangular section wheel is a bit of a nightmare, but it worked.
Marcos Dione (2023-01-27 08:13:13+00:00): Hola, un par de detallitos.

* `name=Sendero Dentro De Campo Privado` no hace falta, a lo sumo ponele access=no

* `Nicolas Olmedo` es el nombre de un campo o del dueño? Y no falta un acento ahí? También, `Tranquera` no es un valor válido para `fence_type`, de hecho es `barrier=gate`; y `material=wood`. Más info en https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:barrier

* Esto no será un fence (alambrado)? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1085810991

* Borraste https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7624011785 porqué?

Gracias por aportar!
ChillyDL (2023-01-18 00:42:52+00:00): Hallo OPerivar,
gibst du bitte noch die Quelle für die Daten an? Insbesondere für das von dir eingezeichnete Hünengrab - das ist in den einschlägigen Werken nicht enthalten.
OPerivar (2023-01-19 19:55:11+00:00): Vom Hügelgrab von einem Bekannten erfahren und es dann falsch als Hünengrab eingetragen. 
Danke für die Korrektur.
Frank Peng (2023-01-17 23:11:28+00:00): My first edit using RapiD
Mashin (2023-01-17 23:40:53+00:00): For roads/trails that have restricted access we use access=private tag.
Thanks
E1892 (2023-01-18 03:18:50+00:00): I initially used that tag, but it does not appear to be removing the road from AllTrails -- is there a latency?
Mashin (2023-01-18 10:18:37+00:00): Yes there is a delay between the live database and their map. I don't know how often the update happens, but I would assume on a scale of days. From what I know trails will then have a text saying "PRIVATE" on them.

As a sidenote, just because a driveway or a trail is privately owned doesn't mean that the access is restricted. For that a gate or a sign saying no trespassing would have to be present. But a tag ownership=private can be added to note the ownership status.

In this regard, is the whole forest road marked as 'no trespassing' or is it only the little stub at the lake. Because it seems that the most of the forest road is inside Great Mountain Forest and was probably meant as a lake access for visitors.

More details on trails and road access tagging can be found here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States/Trail_Access_Project
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access#List_of_possible_values
E1892 (2023-01-18 22:55:19+00:00): The access on the whole road is restricted. It is a right-of-way through Great Mountain Forest for the benefit of the owners of the private access to the pond. The Great Mountain Forest printed map only has the Goodnow Trail (short with loop) marked; not sure how electrons show both. The Forest is in the process of putting up a gate or chain.
E1892 (2023-01-18 22:55:49+00:00): PS -- thanks for your help and links.
Mashin (2023-01-19 00:02:44+00:00): Thanks for clarification. 
I assume they will have to remove this trail (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12110302) if they restricted access by foot as well.
gscholz (2023-01-19 07:53:56+00:00): HI sputinyk,
this changeset has case errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-71.93387&lat=8.00618&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=131399348

Can you please fix this?

I am wondering what was "wrong" here and what should be "right" now as the new offset has shifted the OSM data away from Maxar, Bing and Esri images.
If you did align the map data according to gps data, may be you should state this clearly in the changeset comment not to confuse other users.

Guido
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-01-21 12:47:27+00:00): yes, i moved data according to strava and gpx sent into osm database.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-01-21 12:48:16+00:00): I also reported this wrong offset to maxar.
user_5359 (2023-03-27 06:59:22+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/245342609/history. What is the meaning of the tag yes = collapsed? By the way this change set isn't a good idea: Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dcollapsed.
JoshuaOrais (2024-06-30 14:19:15+00:00): Fixed this already. Thank you for the prompt!
E1892 (2023-01-18 03:12:10+00:00): Hi there, I am new here. I removed several roads/trails from OSM today because they are on private land. It looks like you have restored them to the map. This makes them appear on AllTrails, and encourages hikers. How do we get them removed?
Many thanks.
mrpulley (2024-12-20 22:00:25+00:00): Survey Nov 2024 - no speed zone signs present on this road
Way 7981412 - maxspeed 100 is plausible
Way 1133012740 - not signposted 50, but could be, although it does come off Old Highway which is signposted 60. (Nearby Princes Hwy is maxspeed 50)
NorthCrab (2023-01-18 03:21:10+00:00): Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Zmieniłem wielkość liter w dodanym przez ciebie punkcie. Nie stosujemy tutaj WIELKICH liter (za małymi wyjątkami) ponieważ zmniejszają one przejrzystość i czytelność mapy. W dodatku, krzyczą one na osoby korzystające z map. Pozdrawiam!
RedAuburn (2023-01-26 11:32:38+00:00): this is incredible work, thank you so much!
AndriesP (2023-01-24 09:44:40+00:00): Beste,
op de Albert-I Promenade werd de mogelijkheid tot fietsen hier weggehaald. Ben je hier zeker van dat hier niet meer op gefietst mag worden? Want het fietsnetwerk van Westtoer loopt hier op.
maximekgkmuis (2023-01-24 10:24:06+00:00): Hey, bedankt om het te laten weten. Dat was inderdaad niet de bedoeling. Ik heb zonet gekeken en ik denk het segment gevonden te hebben dat voor het probleem zorgde. Normaal gezien zou het nu weer moeten gaan.
Diego Krein (2023-01-18 02:02:07+00:00): Gracias por colaborar con OpenStreetMap

Cualquier dato que puedan agregar como ser escuelas, negocios, nombres de calles, etc, es muy útil.

Su aporte es importante para los vecinos y demás personas que utilizan el mapa. Pronto estara disponible y actualizado también, en las app de celular como ser OSMAND, Organic Maps o MapsMe

Si quieres ponerte en contacto con la comunidad argentina, donde puede consultar al respecto, puedes seguir este enlace https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Argentina#Contacto

O puede que a Usted le interese hacer todas las correcciones Usted mismo, ya que es de la zona. Es relativamente simple, primero deben ingresar al boton editar ubicado arriba y elegir iD, luego deben seguir el tutorial que les explicará como editar.
user_18250760 (2023-01-18 13:41:29+00:00): under construction c-5 extension alignment
pantufla (2023-09-28 17:59:40+00:00): Hola Wilmer, sin querer estamos duplicando ríos como aquí: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1125194136/history
user_18305684 (2023-01-23 15:35:15+00:00): Hi,

the relation 6695077 is not closed, could you fix it ?

Best regards
Hon約 (2023-01-23 15:41:53+00:00): Ok.I fixed it
user_18305684 (2023-01-23 15:52:41+00:00): Great !
I tried to fix some other things here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131613349
But i'm not sure, if you want to look at.
The stranger things for me is to have nodes with tags place=quarter in the same quarter area.
Best regards
user_18305684 (2023-01-23 16:00:02+00:00): In the relation 14531446 you put amenity=community_centre instead of place=quarter, maybe better ?
Hon約 (2023-01-23 16:10:40+00:00): Ok,I fixed Huangxi Village(relation 14531446)
NorthCrab (2023-01-18 03:19:06+00:00): Dlaczego opisujesz "dodanie działek" a usunąłeś po prostu farmland? To nie ma żadnego związku ze sobą. Wycofałem tą zmianę ponieważ z dostępnych mi źródeł nie wynika aby tam nie było pól uprawnych. Pozdrawiam!
f8127 (2024-09-08 14:23:15+00:00): L'adresse de cette église est suivant la plaque de rue qui se trouve en face de la porte d'entrée de l'église: rue Saint-Fiacre à Autelbas-Barnich.
RaphaelPasloin (2024-09-09 02:02:59+00:00): Bonjour,

Merci pour cette information, cependant, il me semble que celle-ci ne concerne pas directement le groupe de modification que vous commentez.

Ce changeset visait à effectuer une correction technique sur un « landuse » qui croisait l’église, ainsi qu'à ajouter des éléments « building
».

Je comprends que votre commentaire pourrait suggérer une erreur ou un élément problématique dans mon édition. Toutefois, après vérification, il semble que tout soit en ordre.

Pour plus de détails sur l’utilisation des « changesets comments », vous pouvez consulter la page suivante : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Groupes_de_modifications#Discussions_d%E2%80%99un_groupe_de_modifications.

Une note aurait peut-être été plus appropriée dans ce cas.
Néanmoins, si vous faites un clic droit sur l’église et choisissez « Affichez l’adresse », vous obtiendrez : Église Saint-Willibrord, Rue Saint-Fiacre, Autelbas, Arlon, Luxembourg, Wallonie, 6706, Belgique – Place of worship.
Rue Saint-Fiacre est donc correctement déduite des éléments parents et n’a pas besoin d’être ajoutée à l’objet lui-même.
Pour plus de détails sur la manière d’obtenir le nom de la rue, vous pouvez consulter : https://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/ui/details.html?osmtype=W&osmid=331996346&class=amenity.

Ajouter la rue n’aurait de sens que si l’église disposait d’un numéro de rue. Or, selon l’« Imagerie numérique SPW(allonie) PICC », celle-ci n’en dispose pas, et il ne semble pas y en avoir sur le terrain : https://www.mapillary.com/app/?&pKey=373622475722170

Je vous souhaite une belle journée,
Raphaël
Glassman (2023-01-19 00:18:35+00:00): I think you intended to create a landuse area for the community center. There doesn't appear to be a building that size on the imagery. The landuse tag should indicate the use of the area. For example landuse=residential. or landuse=commercial. Can you review this edit? Let me know if you need help.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131401653
Glassman (2023-01-19 00:22:11+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. One suggestion the power line added near wanapun village doesn't have a tower on the east side. Should there be one?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131401740
Glassman (2023-01-19 00:23:30+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. Don't forget to add  power poles or towers as needed.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131401788
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:41:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:38:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:31:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:41:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:45:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:33:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:30:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:40:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:10:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:46:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:33:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:20:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:46:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:16:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:30:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:27:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:31:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:24:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:07:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:18:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:22:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:28:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
user_18305684 (2023-01-23 16:09:55+00:00): Hi,

the relation14531446 is a subarea of the relations 14367839 and 5706345.
In another way of speaking, these 2 relations have a common part which seems strange

Best regards
Hon約 (2023-01-23 16:21:35+00:00): Because one is the nominal management area and the other is the actual management area
user_18305684 (2023-01-28 12:32:35+00:00): Ok, but they have the same tags (boundary=administrative and admin_level=8) with 2 different names so it looks like they are 2 actual administrations.
If one is no more actual (no more used), the better tags maybe should be boundary=historical
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:14:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:44:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert