piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NorthCrab_upload (2024-03-01 19:20:19+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/714942641

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2024-03-01 20:05:10+00:00): 

هذه الخريطة عامة وأرجوا منك عدم إدخال أماكنك الشخصية والعشوائية إلى الخريطة
pantufla (2024-03-22 07:39:44+00:00): Hey Marc, bones. De dónde sale este formato? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11682414110/history

Es para ver si nos podemos poner de acuerdo que también quiero ayudar a poner todas las direcciones de Barna
aTarom (2024-03-02 08:06:32+00:00): Hola , gracias por editar, cuando puedas mira este tag que se ha quedado así:
"06:00-00:00"="yes"
en
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1416767182/history
y añadir el +34... en el tel.
No lo corrijo por que no estoy seguro de si se trata de opening_hours
Saludos
seeergiofdez (2024-03-02 11:36:24+00:00): Gracias por avisarme. Corregido!
silversurfer83 (2024-03-01 21:53:04+00:00): Hi nick :)

please watch out for boundaries when moving geometries. Thanks
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148109555
nick-28 (2024-03-04 14:46:25+00:00): Hi silversurfer,

that's what I usually do (or at least try to). What was the problem in this specific case? Frankly, I cannot find any mistake I made.

Cheers, nick
silversurfer83 (2024-03-04 16:31:30+00:00): Hi nick :)

was hard to find the node again and I guess, after looking hard at it, it must have been glued together before you moved it. It's been around here https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6589296615

keep it up 
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148109555
dadavid (2024-04-24 12:29:39+00:00): moin, 

du hast hier eine FF hinzugefügt, die aber bereits eingetragen war. Besser ist es in dem Fall, das Objekt, das es schon gibt, weiter zu bearbeiten. Dazu kannst du zum Beispiel weitere Namen hinzufügen. Ich passe das jetzt mal an, also keine Sorge :) 

Schau gern nochmal drüber ob das so für dich passt und melde dich bei Fragen gerne. 

Grüße und weiterhin viel Spass beim mappen :) 

David
dadavid (2024-04-24 12:32:12+00:00): ah, war doch bisschen anders :D du hast die FFW hier sowohl als Punkt (Node) als auch als Fläche (Way) hinzugefügt. Da reicht eins von beidem :) Ich füge die jetzt mal zusammen
dadavid (2024-04-24 12:55:35+00:00): soweit ich das sehe wurde das FwH noch nicht eingeweiht. Ich habe das Gebäude mal als building=fire_station gelassen, denn als Wache ist es ja wahrscheinlich schon zu erkennen. Bis es aber wirkich als Wache genutzt wird würde ich die Fläche als construction:amenity=fire_station lassen. Nach der Einweihung wird daraus dann amenity=fire_station, evtl noch mit start_date=*

Im Wiki findest du mehr infos zum lifecycle Prinzip :) 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lebenszyklus-Pr%C3%A4fix

Viele Grüße

David
nickjohnston (2024-03-01 20:06:37+00:00): This changeset was created in error. The Yard was added in changeset 148110378.
whammo (2024-03-02 07:49:58+00:00): This is not correct. 66 has a speed limit of 55, not Langston.
CjMalone (2024-03-06 20:19:35+00:00): Looks good to me, thanks.
pantufla (2024-10-12 11:50:59+00:00): Hola, estas ediciones son errones. Para esto te recomiendo usar la app Street Complete. Puedes responder a estos detalles con la misma cuenta que creaste para OpenStreetMap. También te recomiendo usar OrganicMaps como alternativa a mapsme.
CurlingMan13 (2024-03-03 03:29:53+00:00): You mentioned before "ok, got it", but you are continuing to map landcovers such that they partially overlap...

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148060874
Chris Denomy (2024-03-03 12:29:05+00:00): To clarify, are you referring to the instances/practice where I've overlapped the sand traps with rough?
HellMap (2024-03-02 11:15:11+00:00): Vai šie punkti tiešām ir fordi? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11682618791 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11682618792 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11682618793 ?
richlv (2024-03-02 15:54:01+00:00): AKA brasli :)
HellMap (2024-04-01 10:56:07+00:00): Atbildi nesaņēmām, tāpēc šos punktus nodzēsu.
Tomas Straupis (2024-06-04 07:36:35+00:00): Laba diena. O kas čia toks? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11682671654 Nes lyg ir nėra toje vietoje jokio istorinio/lankytino objekto.
Resutas (2024-06-05 10:46:59+00:00): Tai yra naujai pastatytas Akmuo su vietovės pavadinimu
Tomas Straupis (2024-06-05 11:12:28+00:00): Supratau, tai čia ne natural=stone, miestų riboženklius kažkaip kitaip žymi, kas artwork, kas kažkokį kitą city_limit randa. Paieškosiu ir pakeisiu, nes dabar jis įlindo į „lankytinus objektus akmenis“ :-) Ačiū už info!
Teogramm (2024-03-01 21:09:43+00:00): Add capacity to some bike parkings around SU
Teogramm (2024-03-01 21:10:19+00:00): Add some details to KTH campus
wolfbert (2025-05-07 18:33:01+00:00): Hallo, ab https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1256698368 stimmen die lanes nicht.
GeoAndi (2024-03-01 21:25:49+00:00): MP ist hier nicht erforderlich, da der Sportplatz und die Gebäude ja zum Schulgelände gehören und deswegen nicht ausgeschnitten werden. Hab ich mal angepasst (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148112750).
HAmap (2024-03-02 00:19:19+00:00): Gut, dass du das auch so siehst. War schon vorher so, diesmal nicht auf meinem Mist gewachsen ;-)
Danke :-)
GeoAndi (2024-03-02 18:28:34+00:00): Gerne 👍
JodaStephen (2024-03-10 13:53:36+00:00): I disagree with this. Trunk roads are defined in OSM as "Note that highway=* distinguishes roads by function and importance rather by their physical characteristic and legal classification" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway

Havelock Road is not an OSM trunk road as it cannot be used southbound by most motor vehicles. Thus it does not fulfil the function and importance test of highway=trunk. (It may or may not legally be a trunk road, but that is not of consequence to OSM). Northbound there is more of an argument, but there are no road signs routing London-bound drivers up Havelock Road. (The signposted route from the coast is via Albert Road, Queens Road and St.Helens Road)

Separately, and as supporting evidence, the road has no green signs at either end.

Entirely removing the oneway restriction tags is also incorrect, as OSM now does not record the actual restrictions on the road.

This is obviously a weird case, but I don't believe we do anyone any favours by letting the map suggest that drivers from London to the coast should go via Havelock Road.

FWIW, there is a third option, which is to mark the route via Devonshire Road, South Terrace, Queens Road and Albert Road as highway=trunk for southbound traffic which is the signposted (non green-sign) route to Folkestone. I personally think that is worse than simply terminating the trunk road at the Priory Street loop as I did.

Feel free to discuss on talk-gb mailing list
Nathan_A_RF (2024-03-10 17:26:36+00:00): I believe it is widely accepted that the status of highways in the UK is reflected by trunk, primary and secondary roads (primary route, non-primary route, and B-road). The class of road may not necessarily reflect the use, as here, but nonetheless it is still a primary route.

There is a green sign at the Cornwallis Terrace end, but only parking signs at the southern end. These are always white regardless of primary status.

The road is not oneway. There is no bus lane running opposite to the direction of traffic, just a bus gate at the northern end restricting access. This is represented by turning restrictions mapped at the station junction. Drivers will not be routed along the road in the southern direction due to these.

Devonshire Road and South Terrace are not A or B-roads. They should not be trunk, primary, or secondary ways.
JodaStephen (2024-03-11 14:19:48+00:00): On the oneway issue - exactly the same situation occurs in Brighton, where North Street is bus/taxi/bicycle only westbound, but not restricted eastbound. The tags I added oneway=yes, oneway:bicycle=no, oneway:bus=no, oneway:taxi=no are consistent with that usage.

Recording it solely as access restrictions makes the information hidden to visual users of the map (competent routers may get it correct, but just viewing any render of the map will give the incorrect information.
Nathan_A_RF (2024-03-11 18:15:41+00:00): Not familiar with that way, so I can't comment. But in this case the road is definitely not oneway for buses, cycles and taxis. Only the entrance by the station is restricted. If one wants to use OSM purely as a visual aid then there are dozens of restrictions not marked or either unclear at any zoom level.
JodaStephen (2024-04-25 21:07:05+00:00): Hi! I now have the official answer from West Sussex Highways:

"""
Enquiry ref: 17713985 - Hastings Primary Road Network

Thank you for contacting us about the classification of Havelock Road and Harold Place, Hastings.

Havelock Road & Harold Place are part of the A21 but do not form part of the Primary Road Network (PRN) and therefore the A21 and A259 PRN do not meet.
"""

Given the above, my intention is to remove highway=trunk from Havelock Road and Harold Place. Since I don't have a definitive statement about Cornwallis Terrace, I plan on leaving that as highway=trunk.
Nathan_A_RF (2024-04-25 22:07:05+00:00): That is peculiar, since I have never seen anything regarding this as a non-primary road here, including signs, maps, etc. I might clarify myself where exactly the primary roads in Hastings are.
Dodko (2024-03-02 00:09:47+00:00): Opravené addr:streetnumber
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=148115748
dp7 (2024-03-07 14:21:06+00:00): Ciao, relativamente a questo changeset, non mi risulta il nome che hai indicato correggendo il precedente, come anche altri che hai modificato nella zona. Dove hai recuperato l'informazione ?
LorenzoPesci (2024-03-08 16:09:54+00:00): Anche a me sembra che il nome non abbia riscontri. 
Inoltre noto che è stato usato building=yes (forse per rendering) per dei semplici trocchi che evidentemente non sono un edificio.
effebi-sm (2024-03-09 10:18:21+00:00): https://www.regione.umbria.it/documents/18/24966587/SCHEDE+CENSIMENTO+SORGENTI+LOCALI/40fd5494-484a-4a73-8841-be53311788ab
effebi-sm (2024-03-20 20:33:28+00:00): Tutto Ok allora?
dp7 (2024-03-20 20:42:00+00:00): Ciao, scusami se non ho più risposto. Non conoscevo questo documento e ovviamente non ho particolari obiezioni, vista la fonte, anche se qualche dubbio su qualche strano nome rimane. Ad esempio della “fonte dei cagnolini” non trovo traccia nelle varie carte in mio possesso, ma l’ho trovata citata su un sito web dove viene indicata però come “fonte cagnolini”, senza preposizione, cosa che farebbe pensare più a un cognome che a una cucciolata di peluches, quindi credibile ! ;-)
effebi-sm (2024-03-21 21:40:28+00:00): Bhe qualche incongruenza sul documento c'e', ma  sempre un documento ufficiale è. Inoltre c'e' qualche problemino di coordinate ma all'90% e' affidabile. i dati non sicuri li ho saltati se vuoi puoi inserite gli altri sono arrivato al n°41 ;-)
Jordi MF (2024-03-02 00:28:51+00:00): Hola gabigass,

Por favor, no uses nombres descriptivos para las sendas. Además, veo que estás usando nombres usados por el colectivo BTT para sendas (Senda Toboganes: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1256702138). Como ya te dije, debes de usar la etiqueta "mtb:name=*".

Saludos.
citrula (2024-03-02 08:18:58+00:00): Can you explain what you are trying to do with these edits? the cemetery does not really look forested.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148113225
citrula (2024-03-02 08:19:21+00:00): You can use natural=tree_row instead if you are trying to map the tree row around the cemetery
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148113225
NorthCrab_upload (2024-03-01 21:50:37+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11682735320
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2604112444
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/213806003
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/380684490

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
felipeeugenio (2024-03-02 14:13:15+00:00): Hello. What time of name is AB?
looks like a typo.
regards
kuanb (2024-03-20 23:06:30+00:00): Looks like an error with road class as well - this is a boundary not a highway
woodpeck (2024-03-03 00:05:25+00:00): Don't ;) in OSM we only map stuff that is still visible. If you have to resort to old maps and old photos then you should contribute this information to OpenHistoricalMap, not to OpenStreetMap.
A_Rural_Urbanist (2024-03-03 17:19:47+00:00): I wasn't sure exactly how to do this, but my contributions were for Open Railway Map which uses OSM data. That is a great project, however, they also map long such abandoned right of ways. If you check out the project page you can also write the lead, he may be better able to answer. I am a railway worker so wanted to contribute something here. Also a Durham NH native.
ivanbranco (2024-03-17 11:07:58+00:00): Hi sgnak,

if an element doesn't have a wikipedia/wikidata/wikimedia_commons page please don't tag it as =de:null or =null, not using the tag is enough.

good mapping
mapperich (2024-03-17 11:38:25+00:00): Hi ivanbranco, 
thanks for spotting this mistake. tagging it as =null was not my intent. I should fix it my tampermonkey script.

I queried for =null and fixed it. Thanks again!
HellMap (2024-03-02 10:54:05+00:00): Sveiki,

Lūgums zīmēt grāvjus atsevišķi no administratīvo robežu līnijām. Un uzmanīgāk pēc tam savienot tos ar citiem elementiem. Kā arī nelietot redaktora piedāvātos labojumus, ja tie neatbilst patiesībai (piemēram neeksistējoši fordi starp ceļiem un grāvjiem). Pieliekot grāvja tegus uz šīm līnijām ir izveidotas ļoti daudz papildus problēmu. Un šo oficiāli noteikto robežas līniju nevar pēc tam bīdīt, kā grāvja līniju. Es, cik varēju, šeit izlaboju.
tom_yorados (2024-03-01 22:32:02+00:00): also changed rest_area into highway=services, 'caus there is a petrol station
user_14538650 (2024-03-02 14:31:25+00:00): Thank you so so much!!!
elot360 (2025-01-10 01:31:20+00:00): Dlaczego zmieniono nazwę przystanków, jeśli na gruncie i w rozkładach jazdy jest BMC?
urbalazs (2024-03-02 08:30:54+00:00): Hogy lehet ennek a házszáma 59, ha a 73-as számú épületre van ráhúzva? Valamelyik cím nem jó. Továbbá a szám után nem szoktunk pontot tenni. Javítsd kérlek!
csaba68 (2024-03-02 11:23:00+00:00): Az épület házszáma 59 én vagyok a tulajdonos,hibás a 73
aselvadeasfalto (2024-03-02 13:03:36+00:00): Caro ATMoreira,

Etiquetar lotes de terrenos como building=* é errado, pois os edifícios devem ser representados pelo contorno da sua área de implantação, que fica circunscrito pelo lote, como já foi rectificado no changeset 124567709. Se pretende melhorar o mapa, sugiro que deixe os lotes como place=plot e desenhe os próprios edifícios dentro destes. Se fez esta alteração porque pretende que o número de porta fique visível na renderização, deve copiar as etiquetas addr:*=* do place=plot para o building=* que desenhar.

Boas edições,
Selva
Xvtn (2024-03-04 16:08:59+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes. Looks great to me, no complaints! Thanks for your contribution.
GovernorKeagan (2024-03-01 23:46:36+00:00): The cycle lane has been tagged with the main road (Kilmacud Road Lower) but it is separate for the most part. Should it be tagged as it was or as a separate cycleway like I did?
gscholz (2024-03-04 08:04:47+00:00): Hi AjBelnuovo,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-48.36138&lat=-1.33892&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=148115631
Especially way 227869102 is affected here:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/227869102/history

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
AjBelnuovo (2024-03-04 11:52:28+00:00): Could you please see if it has been corrected?
gscholz (2024-03-04 14:43:22+00:00): Thanks for your quick response. The area has been deleted so the error is gone now, but I am not sure if deletion was the right measure here.
Sconni (2024-03-04 12:40:29+00:00): Not Halo46 property. Halo owns Abbott Dr. and a parking structure to the west side of Vieu Carre.
Xvtn (2024-03-04 16:22:40+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes here. Things mostly look good to me! One problem, though, is with the addresses on those buildings. You've added the name=* tag, whereas the address belong in addr:*=* tags. (You can use the form in the online iD editor to add the right tags.) Name is for the "common name" of a feature. Let me know if you have any questions, and thanks for your contributions!
citrula (2024-03-02 05:07:39+00:00): You can use amenity=library_dropoff (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dlibrary_dropoff ). Also, please don't use descriptive names
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148116355
SomeoneElse (2024-03-02 02:21:12+00:00): Also adding real 20 stops mostly from survey, some from naptan
citrula (2024-03-02 05:04:58+00:00): Welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contributions. I encourage you to leave a changeset comment describing what edits you are making.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148116790
emersonveenstra (2024-03-08 12:30:02+00:00): Hi there,

On https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4730031807/history, you added the "traffic_signals" tag. I just wanted to make sure since there doesn't seem to be a traffic signal in the aerial imagery, that it's actually a traffic signal. Could you confirm that? Thanks!
Jbell4588 (2024-03-08 16:08:59+00:00): Yes, I can, and thanks for the little audit. Zebra crossings along south 2nd south, between east 3rd south and east 7th south have traffic signals to indicate whether a pedestrian is crossing. The city decided to implement these signaled crossings because of the high volume of students traveling to and from the  the college and crossing here.
You might not be able initially see them from the aerial photography, but a close inspection on either side of the crossing will show that there are flashing signals. 
If you would like to independently corroborate this outside of my personal experience, then I suggest using a service like google streetview to further confirm.
Thanks!
emersonveenstra (2024-03-09 13:45:23+00:00): Thanks, I just wanted to double check.

Also, just fyi, we aren't allowed to use Google Streetview to help with mapping
Jbell4588 (2024-03-12 01:29:25+00:00): Thanks for letting me know!
spiregrain (2024-03-02 10:50:16+00:00): Hi there, thanks for adding this.   It's already proving useful according to the diamondgeezer commentariat https://tridentscan.jaggedseam.com/dg/3409350966603436322/

But I think some of the ways are missing from the southern two segments.
MacLondon (2024-03-03 02:22:33+00:00): I've got most of it mapped now (guided by the footways and gojauntly maps, which do actually differ at some locations). There could be some minor inaccuracies on OSM but it should probably be good enough to follow (and correct where necessary.)

I've left 2 gaps around Elephant & Castle where a ground survey would be needed to work out exactly where pedestrians are intended to cross the the road.
spiregrain (2024-03-03 07:11:22+00:00): Thank you very much!
andi9876 (2024-03-15 14:55:41+00:00): Hi.
No highway visible yet. Even no construction activitys. Waiting with add motorways. Reverted.
shane990 (2024-03-02 04:06:34+00:00): Stinesville Elementary Closed years ago, this is now a community center and our police department, I am a police officer here. All info is now up to date with phone numbers
user_14538650 (2024-03-02 08:37:07+00:00): Hey, thank you for mapping Vietnam. We have a mapathon in progress to map the Old Quarter at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/hanoi-and-ho-chi-minh-city-mapping-collaboration/109534/3, would you like to join?
tbayri (2024-03-03 10:22:25+00:00): Hi! I'm moving quite a lot, but i'll add whatever I can!
MxxCon (2024-03-07 01:05:40+00:00): Hello.
What is the source of these changes?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148118391
cubbe8 (2024-03-07 01:15:56+00:00): I just flew out of JFK last week and saw Terminal 2 has been demoed. The roads and construction zone are from Bing Maps Imagery provided on OSM which has been updated very recently.
JAAS (2024-06-18 17:06:33+00:00): Buenos días Guiso.

Le comento que en la casilla del nombre `name=*` debe colocarse siempre el nombre tal y como aparece en los rótulos de las calles [exceptuando aquellos nombres abreviados como: `Dr.`, `Lic.`, `Gral.` `Blvd.`, etc' a los que se les deberá colocar la palabra que representa la abreviatura]. En este caso `Avenida Reforma` es como se llaman, tanto la vía principal, como los carriles auxiliares que corren en paralelos en ambos lados de ella: [https://www.mapillary.com/app/user/jaas?lat=14.601164999999995&lng=-90.516839&z=19.9&pKey=1256898492365429&focus=photo&x=0.4723885768542928&y=0.5193299047323633&zoom=0] - de hecho, en la vida real cotidiana, al buscar una dirección sobre esa u otras avenidas principales, estas generalmente se encuentran sobre los "carriles auxiliares" de `Avenida Reforma` (en este caso) sin que necesariamente colinden con la vía principal, pero todos las conocemos sin colocarle el "Carril Auxiliar" al nombre. Por ejemplo, la dirección "Avenida Reforma 10-00 Zona 9" queda en la esquina de la 10a Calle y el carril auxiliar de "Avenida Reforma", del lado poniente en la Zona 9.  Cuando las vías se conocen con otros nombres, incluso se pueden utilizar otros nombres con los que se conoce una vía, pero éstos deberán colocarse como `alt_name=*` u otras opciones que existen para ello. Siempre trate de respetar y no borrar el trabajo realizado por otros; usualmente se pueden dejar estas versiones anteriores con otras "etiquetas titulares" cuando en realidad no corresponden al verdadero nombre, por ejemplo: `description=*`, `note=*` o `alt_name`, así queda siempre el historial de lo que otros han contribuido sin borrarlos. 

Hay casos bastante conocidos como la `name=Calle Montúfar` y `alt_name=12 Calle` en los que se ambos nombres se utilizan indiferentemente localmente por todos.

Por aparte son las actualizaciones de datos, cuando las características de algo cambian, por ejemplo en una una calle que solía ser de terracería (`surface=unpaved`), pero que luego la pavimentan, se le puede cambiar a `surface=asphalt` (o lo que corresponda) sin dejar la descripción existente previamente - cabe mencionar para este ejemplo que OSM toma TODAS las vías como pavimentadas (sin importar el tipo se superficie) a menos que se indique lo contrario con una etiqueta correspondiente: (`surface=unpaved/ground/sand/etc`).

Ojalá se anime pronto y logremos reunirnos para planificar cómo avanzar juntos con todo esto!

Saludos cordiales,
JAAS
literan (2024-03-08 22:18:37+00:00): это автодорога (highway=road), соответственно, она не может называться "Берёзовская узкоколейная железная дорога". Откат правки.