piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
aTarom (2026-06-02 19:34:55+00:00): Hola, el elemento
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13894813301/history
no podemos considerarlo pico
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dpeak
se trata de un "islet" quizás?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dislet
los valores de elevación deben ser un número entero
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ele
me dices, cualquier duda también puedes exponerla en el grupo de telegram o en el foro
https://t.me/OSMes
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/es/51
Saludos
dtormol (2026-06-03 10:47:31+00:00): Hola,
Son un conjunto de rocas que solo se ven de marea baja.
Cambio lo de peak por islet.
Estoy empezando en esto y no me había fijado en ese tipod e elemento.
Muchas gracias.
aTarom (2026-06-03 12:46:29+00:00): Muchas gracias a ti por colaborar tan rápido! Todo un placer trabajar así.
Cualquier consulta pregunta en
https://t.me/OSMes
o
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/es/51
Feliz mapeo
Fizzie-DWG (2026-07-12 03:42:41+00:00): DWG revert - apparent sock-puppet import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185570668
d_berger (2026-06-04 10:07:12+00:00): Hallo und Danke für das Interesse an OSM. Gleich mit dem zweiten Änderungssatz habt ihr zum komplexen Thema 'Routen' gegriffen, welches mittels Relationen gelöst wird. Bei OSM werden Wege nie doppelt eingetragen, insbesondere nicht um Rundwege abzubilden. Da ihr dies wohl als Karte eueren Besuchern anbieten möchtet, empfehle ich euch dies mittels uMap (https://umap.osm.ch/) zu lösen; dort könnt ihr nach Belieben selber reinzeichnen. Für weitere Fragen kann ich auch das Forum (https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/ch/107) empfehlen. LG, Dani
d_berger (2026-06-04 10:13:36+00:00): reverted with CS 183636419
d_berger (2026-06-04 10:14:10+00:00): reverted with CS 183636419, see CS 183538875
Rick Richards (2026-06-02 11:39:41+00:00): Vdaka za upravu trolejoveho vedenia.
Fizzie-DWG (2026-07-12 04:03:22+00:00): DWG revert - apparent sock-puppet import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185571112
Fizzie-DWG (2026-07-12 03:42:42+00:00): DWG revert - apparent sock-puppet import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185570668
czubi (2026-06-07 13:41:52+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1525456952#map=16/50.70025/11.11127&layers=N

relation nur mit innern?
ticki_52 (2026-06-07 17:12:04+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis.  
Im Moment arbeite ich größere Bereiche systematisch durch, daher können an einzelnen Stellen vorübergehend kleine Inkonsistenzen entstehen.

Die Nutzung von Prüftools bringt in dieser Phase leider wenig, weil viele Strukturen gerade im Umbau sind und sich laufend ändern. Sobald der Abschnitt konsolidiert ist, gehe ich die Details sauber durch.

Wenn es konkrete technische Punkte gibt, die nach Abschluss noch relevant sind, schaue ich sie mir gern an.
streckenkundler (2026-06-08 20:22:30+00:00): https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/offensichtlich-problematische-bearbeitungen-im-thuringer-wald/144453
evdence (2026-06-03 05:06:04+00:00): Then it's a service road no? It's not rlly unclassified anymore because it's barely possible to drive through it now some of the path has overgrown
HellMap (2026-06-03 10:12:17+00:00): You set it as grade4 compacted track before. And now you are saying it's barely driveable and overgrown in places. Last time I was here, it was driveable fine. I cannot imagine it overgrowing in 2 years that much. Which parts are overgrown? Do you have photos or something to show it?

May be it can be set to track from V7 to Dravenieki. But not the section until farmyard access. Service roads are also never this long when they connect between other roads/tracks. It's almost always either unclassified or track.
evdence (2026-06-03 11:23:49+00:00): Yes its grade4 definitely from V7-Dravnieki some places overgrown, I drove through today itš driveable through by bike a bit harder with car especially in summer. It is track grade4 from V7 to Dravnieki, rest is unclassified
bxl-forever (2026-06-02 13:02:33+00:00): Thanks for the "Add"
A point with just a name will not be rendered.
We changed it into a shop that sells car accessories.
Also, in Belgium we do not repeat addresses on businesses, all the addresses are already on the map, duplicates (or personal versions of bilingual names) are not useful.
We fixed your edit.
Fizzie-DWG (2026-07-12 04:03:23+00:00): DWG revert - apparent sock-puppet import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185571112
rajdhani (2026-06-03 07:02:25+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: 183576860
Sheraz Mzuri (2026-06-02 10:40:01+00:00): Hello?
Wildsharky (2026-06-04 12:02:32+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:183573506
Fizzie-DWG (2026-07-12 04:03:24+00:00): DWG revert - apparent sock-puppet import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185571112
flohoff (2026-06-02 11:28:05+00:00): Moin,
einfach nur nodes mit einem "name" zu taggen reicht bei OSM nicht aus. Es geht darum das in einen semantischen zusammenhang zu stellen. Daher gibt es tags die sagen um WAS fur einen Point of Interest (POI) es sich handelt. Also eine Firma für Pferdezubehör oder eine Schmiede. Erst dann wird auch der name sauber angezeigt.

Dazu kommt das "information" kein OSM tag ist. Für die webseite eine Firma wird contact:website oder website benutzt als tag

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:website
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:craft
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:office
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop

Flo
Hartmut Holzgraefe (2026-06-02 14:26:36+00:00): Außerdem ergibt das auch nur bei POIs mit Publikumsverkehr tatsächlich Sinn. 

Da die Adresse Kafkastraße 25 nicht einmal unter "Kontakt" auf der angegebenen Webseite zu finden ist (nur als Pflichtangabe im Impressum) und es sich um ein reines Wohngebäude zu handeln scheint gehört der Eintrag recht klar nicht hierher.
Muhmaker (2026-06-10 14:58:39+00:00): Das sieht nach Werbung für eine reine Digital-Zeitschrift aus. OSM ist dafür nicht der richtige Ort. Ich habe es wieder entfernt.
Senihtu (2026-06-03 05:26:51+00:00): Guten Morgen!
Ist way 128013740 (Sandershäuser Straße) hier wirklich eine Einbahnstraße?
Gibt es eine Ausnahme für Bus 30: Escherode => Kassel (Relation 1732841)?
Grüße
Senihtu
abrensch (2026-06-03 08:19:17+00:00): sorry da war ich zu vorschnell, hab's wieder raus. Gruss, Arndt
Fizzie-DWG (2026-07-12 03:53:39+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20936
Fizzie-DWG (2026-07-12 04:03:25+00:00): DWG revert - apparent sock-puppet import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185571112
hatul (2026-06-05 07:31:08+00:00): שלום חיליק ותודה על העריכה.
מחקת בטעות את היחס של שביל הסנהדרין מחלק מהשביל. בבקשה היזהר בפעם הבאה.
hatul (2026-06-05 07:34:04+00:00): בנוסף, אין צורך לסמן עבירות עם access=yes או motor_vehicle=yes. זו ברירת המחדל אם לא צוין משהו אחר.
תודה
joost schouppe (2026-06-04 08:45:39+00:00): Hi Fred,
You created a duplicate police here, it's already mapped as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4608697201
I'll remove your version.
fredlenoir (2026-06-04 08:59:42+00:00): Sorry for that mistake. I haven't seen the picture. Thanks for the correction
Wildsharky (2026-06-04 11:59:43+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:183572515
phoenixsaigon1698 (2026-06-03 16:24:39+00:00): cái biển báo cấm rẽ phải theo giờ từ Thủ Khoa Huân vào Lý Tự Trọng cho xe 4w là tiếp nối của việc cấm rẽ phải từ Lê Thánh Tôn vào Thủ Khoa Huân nhé em. Chỉ bỏ khi không còn biển báo https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16024154 này. 

2. Em xóa biển báo thì phần changeset comment ghi rõ là "xóa biển báo cấm oto rẽ phải theo giờ" chứ không ghi chung chung là "Update base on kartaview #grabosm". 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
FroschForscher (2026-06-02 14:22:21+00:00): 32m! 😮 der Weg wird heute Abend in CQI blau erstrahlen.
no_sch (2026-06-04 08:37:38+00:00): Stimmt er ist nun dunkelblau mit 100%. Ich hab mich erst gewundert was du mit 32m meinst, denn der weg ist ja länger. Bis mir aufgefallen ist das die Breite statt 3,2m 32m enthält.  :-). Das ändere ich gleich
wombatmaper (2026-06-28 22:23:35+00:00): amenity=toilets and toilets=no. What does this mean? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1150798591/history/3
silversurfer83 (2026-06-03 16:09:47+00:00): next bad edit.

find out what highway=bridleway means. see the history of the paths you touched.

Ask the English community for help.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183542611
Access Claims (komoot) (2026-06-04 12:25:35+00:00): Thanks. The tags have been readjusted to their original state. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183642604
ABurntDuck (2026-06-02 13:59:19+00:00): The house is a Four Square style with a deck and porch, there isn't a bunch of jutting points that the original traced shape had, hence why I deleted it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183542691
osmviborg (2026-06-02 13:49:58+00:00): Hej, Din vej er nu markeret med "access=private". Din redigering ville ikke virke.
Wildsharky (2026-06-04 12:05:37+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:183640960
rajdhani (2026-06-03 04:42:12+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: 183572226
joost schouppe (2026-07-10 12:57:00+00:00): During this challenge, it'd have been great to also add clarifications about the site, in this case historic=wayside_cross
NorthCrab_upload (2026-06-02 23:04:09+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/373800403

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
silversurfer83 (2026-06-03 16:08:27+00:00): please set the access tags that were present before you touched this highway. this looks very wrong
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183543988
Access Claims (komoot) (2026-06-04 13:03:38+00:00): The tags were reinstated. Thank you. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183644469#map=16/47.49576/12.57366&layers=ND
silversurfer83 (2026-06-03 16:07:27+00:00): hi

check this https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/25832961 and educate yourself what the traffic_sign=DE:250 means. Your "tag adjustment" went really bad here. 

read the wiki before you touch anything.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183544381
Access Claims (komoot) (2026-06-04 12:11:59+00:00): The tags have been set to their original state> https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183641777
ajmat (2026-06-04 04:13:17+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: 183621826
Kovoschiz (2026-06-02 17:18:14+00:00): Can you remind me why this is needed?
kingkingHK (2026-06-03 02:42:53+00:00): @Kovoschiz no red minibuses on expressways unless signed otherwise, but this is such an obscure and region-specific rule we cannot expect data consumers to know this, so explicitly stating `share_taxi=no` is better.
vectorial8192 (2026-06-03 13:09:01+00:00): Echoes @kingkingHK (iirc I coined this).

In addition, actually, we can't imply it (see Tsing Sha Highway, e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/704637807 ). It's basically the "pedestrian street but allows cars" situation again, the friendly kind of troll-tagging.
Kovoschiz (2026-06-03 18:59:15+00:00): I was more curious why it's only added to `=motorway_link` before the longer `=motorway`
kingkingHK (2026-06-04 04:43:22+00:00): Both can be done, as share taxis are, by default, prohibited on all expressways (link or not).
vectorial8192 (2026-06-04 08:08:13+00:00): I'm just gonna keep it simple. If they can't get in then they can't use the road, unless they airlift it in, which afaik is illegal. Also, the signage are at entrances but not along the main road, which can be confusing to verify ("consequential mapping").
felipeeugenio (2026-06-02 12:36:48+00:00): + Nota resuelta #5322259
MappingMore (2026-06-05 07:55:34+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset ID:183680552
felipeeugenio (2026-06-02 12:43:11+00:00):  + Nota resuelta #5322251
stasiu512 (2026-06-02 13:08:51+00:00): Cześć proszę zapoznaj się z https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone. W tym przypadku powinno być `phone=+48 42 613 97 00`. Tak też uczyniłem w tej zmianie - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183546033.
silversurfer83 (2026-06-03 16:04:41+00:00): Hi

next hint: access=yes is universal access. note=* is displayed to users in many editors but not all. A fixme=* is "louder" and a different kind of note also get's some kind of attention from the locals (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Notes)

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183545853
Access Claims (komoot) (2026-06-04 13:14:47+00:00): Thank you for the hint. I have shared it with the team> https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183645135
martinst (2026-06-02 16:23:54+00:00): Hallo Annemoon,
access=no ist nur in sehr seltenen Fällen die richtige Angabe (siehe OSM Wiki).
Wie ist der Weg denn beschildert? Falls dort z.B. kein Schild steht gehört auch kein access-Wert eingetragen.
Gruß Martin
Annemoon (2026-06-03 06:40:18+00:00): hi Martin! Es ist ein Trittspur runter zum Ammer, und ich dachte, da es kein offiziell ausgeschilderte Weg ist heisst das, man darf dort eigentlich nicht gehen (weil in Naturschutzgebiet)
Annemoon (2026-06-03 06:47:53+00:00): was wäre denn in solchen Fälle den richtigen tag?
martinst (2026-06-03 15:07:20+00:00): Im Schutzgebiet Way 1111610148 gibt es laut dem dort verlinkten PDF kein Betretungsverbot und auch kein Wegegebot.
Wieso sollte die Verwendung des Pfades verboten sein?
felipeeugenio (2026-06-02 14:46:33+00:00): Hola. Van mejorando los mapeos y la definición de los bosques. Respecto de los senderos, por favor siempre agregar la superficie (surface=). si no la conoces en detalle, pero sabes que no es pavimentado, usar =unpaved.

Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183546264
felipeeugenio (2026-06-02 14:47:55+00:00): Lo otro. Las estructuras (Casas, galpones, etc..) las puedes cuadrar usando la letra Q. Así te quedan con ángulos rectos.
Las que agregaste se nota que están hechas a pulso.

Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183546264
lankapuhelin (2026-06-06 12:48:13+00:00): Hello, I would like to point out something about addresses. Here you've mapped addr:housenumber=3A, but it should be 3. Then, the building letter A should be marked with addr:unit=A. This is because both buildings actually have the same address (3), A and B only specifies the building, not a separate, distinct address.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-20 12:02:03+00:00): Removed overly marketing description=* and cleaned up other SEO/malformed tags for POI in changeset 184350367

https://osm.org/changeset/184350367
mga_geo (2026-06-03 05:26:52+00:00): Bonjour,
En modifiant le raccordement de la "Place de la Gare" avec "Rue du Docteur Bailleul" vous avez cassé plusieurs relations "route=bus" r4259835 r8737097 r20206808 r20206809 
Pouvez-vous corriger ?
Merci d'avance
Marc
Marildv (2026-06-04 06:11:34+00:00): Bonjour mga_geo ! Je vous prie de m'excuser pour l'erreur que j'ai commise. J'ai corrigé les relations que vous avez indiquées. Tout a été corrigé dans le changeset 183581066. Cordialement, Maryia. 

Hello, mga_geo! Please accept my apologies for the mistake I made. I have fixed the relations you pointed out. Everything has been corrected in changeset 183581066. Best regards, Maryia.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183547252
mueschel (2026-06-04 09:15:06+00:00): This changeset contains many duplicates of existing buildings plus a large number of tags that shouldn't be in OSM like "Materiau_mur" or a directory from your local hard drive. 
Please don't use the name tag for descriptions like "WC" or "Villa".
TrickyFoxy (2026-06-08 23:01:56+00:00): 👋 В правом меню редактора есть кнопка «Настройки фонового изображения». Выберите там спутниковые снимки ESRI — они свежее.
Leo Slager (2026-06-02 21:40:49+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Frank Peng (2026-07-23 19:00:00+00:00): Please do not map turn lanes as separate ways unless there is a physical barrier separating the turn lanes from the other lanes (such as what you did here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/20602563/history). Instead, use the turn:lanes= tag to denote the turning movements permitted from each lane.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:turn#Indicated_turns_by_lane
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:turn#Examples
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183548706
Frank Peng (2026-07-23 19:01:50+00:00): Typo: Instead, use the turn:lanes=* tag to denote the turning movements permitted from each lane.
Frank Peng (2026-07-23 19:07:39+00:00): The incorrect road geometry you mapped at the intersection of the I-81 Exit 137 entrance and exit ramps and Wildwood Road has been fixed in changeset 183990376.
https://osmcha.org/changesets/183990376
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183548706
MxxCon (2026-06-02 16:09:31+00:00): Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you delete parking entrance nodes?
Also does disney occupy the whole building or only certain floors?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183549383
Ryan Mutton (2026-06-04 19:40:21+00:00): Hi sorry very new to OSM.
I thought those were remnants of whatever used to be on this lot. That isn't parking--that's loading dock. 

There's street level retail that's being filled in. The "main" building is all Disney or subsidiaries.
Ryan Mutton (2026-06-04 19:47:08+00:00): Adjusted to loading docks in: 183663519
Frank Peng (2026-06-03 20:17:49+00:00): Please make sure to include a "via" way/node for turn restricton relations. The turn restriction relations you added in this changeset only have two members, the "from" and "to" ways, which is not correct. Osmose will flag those issues. Turn restriction relations need to have at least three members, a "from" way, at least one "via" node/way, and a "to" way. For more information, please refer to the "Members" section of this OSM Wiki article on turn restriction relations: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction#Members

> The most common form of a restriction relation is a triplet {from-way, via-node, to-way}, accompanied with a restriction=* tag specifying whether a turn from the from-way to the to-way is permitted at the via-node. There may be several turn restrictions at a junction, represented by separate relations.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183549387
Frank Peng (2026-06-03 20:23:50+00:00): Just to clarify, turn restriction relations need to have one "via" node, or one or more "via" ways. The "via" node or way(s) connect "the beginning and end ways representing the attempted turn."
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction#Members
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183549387
Frank Peng (2026-07-13 01:10:34+00:00): I went ahead and fixed the turn restriction relation issues detected by Osmose by adding the missing "via" node to those turn restriction relations in changeset 184038997.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184038997

You can also view changeset 184038997 on OSMCha, which may be easier to review: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184038997
micheleOSM3 (2026-06-03 17:52:53+00:00): Ciao, ho rimesso highway=via_ferrata sulla way perché secondo la wiki è corretto mapparlo così. Inoltre, sempre secondo la wiki, il tag via_ferrata_scale dovrebbe essere usato in combinazione con highway=via_ferrata. Riguardo al tracciato, ho rimosso il tratto finale che arriva alla cima che non è una ferrata è solo la prosecuzione alla cima che puoi fare anche tramite altri sentieri senza kit e quindi non ha senso chiamarlo ferrata.
Friendly_Ghost (2026-06-02 14:33:58+00:00): Also removed invalid lane count at autostrada toll booths. JOSM gave me some conflict warnings that I tried to resolve, but I don't know if that succeeded.
tordans (2026-06-02 14:31:23+00:00): Situation an dem Kreisverkehr ist komplex. Ich habe jetzt die beiden Übergänge die nur einen Knoten haben umgetaggt. Und einheitliche Gehweg+Fahrrad frei außer die Übergänge, die baulich als getrennte Geh-Radweg-Übergänge (stückchen) gebaut sind. Siehe auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Verkehrswende-Meetup/Gehwege
NieWnen (2026-06-02 16:48:00+00:00): Zostało tagowanie proposed. Te również należy poprawić manualnie w tagach.
silversurfer83 (2026-06-03 16:01:13+00:00): Hi there,

I appreciate you trying to tidy up.

With this edit you did not leave any notes with the OSM-objects. You just allowed *all* modes of traffic on the highway=track you touched here. I believe that was not the intention, right.

Maybe check the history of the objects and set them to the access tags they had before you came along

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183550284
Access Claims (komoot) (2026-06-04 19:23:50+00:00): Corrections have been applied based on the object's history. Thank you.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183662572
MappingMore (2026-06-03 12:16:18+00:00): Reverted in changeset ID:183591102
BerryTrails (2026-06-11 10:47:35+00:00): Please avoid making unnecessary edits in Indonesia. Some of the recent changes seem incorrect and are creating issues. Kindly review the data carefully before making edits to ensure accuracy and consistency.
MarcoR (2026-06-02 20:18:25+00:00): Ciao e benvenuti su OpenStreetMap!

Con questo gruppo di modifiche hai spostato un nodo di uno svincolo tra Via Lidia Poet e Via di Levante a qualche centinaio di metri collegandolo poi di nuovo con Via di Levante. Hai anche tolto alcuni tag importanti senza alcun apparente motivo a quello stesso svincolo: way/200081871; inoltre hai cambiato la classe di Via dei Pelaghi da unclassified a service che però viene usato per "strade di accesso o interne ad aree di servizio, spiagge, campeggi, complessi industriali, centri commerciali, residenze, posteggi, discariche, installazioni, ecc."
Vedi la wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:highway

Le altre modifiche mi sembrano buone :)
JulesGabrielVerne (2026-06-09 06:29:42+00:00): Jakie źródło "Kociej Góry"?
PawelZia (2026-06-09 07:05:22+00:00): Mapy topograficzne z lat 60 i 70 XX wieku.
Dwa zrzuty fragmentu mapy tutaj: https://imgur.com/a/lnPBDaJ
Według lokalnych leśników (emerytowanych) nazwę nadano w latach 50 na miejscu przedwojennej Holten-Berge. W latach 60 jej część zniwelowano zabierając piasek pod przebudowę drogi. Górka mocno przeorana znajduje się po prawej stronie w lasku, za pompownią, jadąc od Tanowa.
JulesGabrielVerne (2026-06-09 07:38:14+00:00): ok, dzięki za wyczerpującą odpowiedź
mueschel (2026-06-04 09:16:33+00:00): This changeset contains many duplicates of existing buildings plus a large number of tags that shouldn't be in OSM like "Materiau_mur" or a directory from your local hard drive. 
Please don't use the name tag for descriptions like "WC" or "Villa".
Szymson (2026-06-02 16:16:40+00:00): Kolego, gorzej z głową? Zacznij wreszcie odpisywać na komentarze do zestawów zmian. To nie jest Rock Park:
https://rockcapital.pl/projekty/rock-park-pruszcz-gdanski/