piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SekeRob (2024-11-12 07:30:30+00:00): Strictly speaking, the west part looks like being used by 2 track vehicles in recent time with some gravel additive on top, making it at least highway=track, grade 2. For path I don't tag bicycle=yes as that is implicit.... all routers assume path is foot/bicycle permitted. I only tag when there's an exception else we can start mapping  millions of ways with bicycle=yes. Many signs here bicycle speed 'velocità moderata' or max 10kmh... try that on a simple bike without speed display :o)))). Latter wholly ignored by 99.999% including the cops.

Valhalla is quick, OSRM is slow GraphHopper the slowest. Got a path that at least a month later is still not routed correctly by GH. One needs a machete for that path. The start is even impassable... a 2m 80 degree slope with dense scrub. Whoever put that path there must have been on a downhill. There's lots of MTB oneway tracks for downhill only. The furgone brings you to the top, trailer with 10-12 MTBs in tow.

ciao
BHiko (2024-11-12 09:18:29+00:00): Agree about the west part being track, I did not touch that.
Agree about bicycle=yes, it was from someone else, I removed it.
Agree about speed limits: not useful to map them.
Last week, I took an (unmapped) path uphill, connecting new track to old railway track, pushing electric city bike by hand. Not really a problem. Not mapped because change expected. Uploaded GPX now.
BHiko (2024-11-13 10:04:38+00:00): OSRM routing is updated, not through rocky old train track any more: https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_bike&route=42.22576%2C14.55790%3B42.21341%2C14.58498#map=16/42.21958/14.57143&layers=Y
SekeRob (2024-11-13 11:00:31+00:00): 👍👍👍👍
Marvk (2025-06-29 14:44:53+00:00): Hi Lutz, bei diesem und einigen anderen deiner Änderungen hat sich bei den Öffnungszeiten ein en-dash (–) eingeschlichen, damit die Öffnungszeiten vernünftig Maschinenlesbar sind, solle aber ein normaler Bindestrich (-) genutzt werden. Hab davon mal ein paar korrigiert, die von Osmose erkannt wurden :-)
LutzAdam (2025-06-29 16:00:58+00:00): Hallo Marvk, danke für Deine Hilfe. Ich kenne Osmose nicht. Kannst Du mir einen Tipp geben?
Lutz
LutzAdam (2025-06-29 17:17:23+00:00): Hallo Marvk, ich habe Osmose gefunden und konnte auch nach falschen open_hours suchen. Ich mappe gerade in Kirchrode und in der Nähe von Markt- und Osterstraße. Wo waren denn die falschen Öffnungszeiten?
Lutz
LutzAdam (2025-06-29 17:32:39+00:00): Hallo Marvk, ich sehe gerade, die Fehler waren am Große Hillen.
Lutz
Marvk (2025-06-30 13:03:14+00:00): Hi Lutz, Osmose ist ein Qualitätssicherungs-Tool, welches viele Probleme automatisch erkennt, so zum Beispiel falsch formatierte Öffnungszeiten. Und genau, ein paar Fehler habe ich am Großen Hillen korrigiert :)

Grüße
woodpeck_repair (2024-12-02 23:53:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 159862440, 159862427, 159862512, 159862481, 159862457, 159862433 where the changeset comment is: revert roblox_gmx edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16954
Marek-M (2024-11-12 09:56:21+00:00): Cześć, punkty adresowe, w szczególności te będące w obrysie budynku nie mogą mieć dodanego tagu `building=yes` - taką edycję zrobiłeś m.in. dla tego punktu: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8395466750 - dasz radę poprawić wszystkie takie swoje edycje, bo podobną edycję zrobiłeś też przy tworzeniu np. tego węzła https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12331265263
Udarian (2024-11-11 23:23:47+00:00): if you have access=private on a road or gate it is implied that the other uses are also private, as in if you have access=private you don't need motor_vehicle=private. you only need to specify a value for motor vehicles, bicycles or any other mode of transportation of it is different than the default or is only usable by certain modes like a bicycle and foot path.

also names aren't descriptions.

Happy mapping,
Udar.
Udarian (2024-11-11 23:29:14+00:00): also entrances don't go in the middle of a road, they describe places you can enter a building, so usually they are at the spot a footway meets a building.

Happy mapping,
Udar.
CjMalone (2026-01-29 11:00:40+00:00): Presumably currency:EUR=yes is a mistake here?
ABZ_OSM (2026-01-29 15:06:01+00:00): Fixed. ty
ABZ_OSM (2026-01-29 15:09:41+00:00): That EUR tag was not me BTW, but it is fixed never the less.

I drew out the retail park in detail for the first time, but a long time ago.

Probarly someone simply making a mistake.

As a local, when I get a moment, at the Aldi tags, particularly becasue the phone number listed is not a local number. It won't be for a while though
CjMalone (2026-01-31 08:04:43+00:00): Oh, I thought I looked at the history. Must have clicked the wrong changeset, thanks.
Syl (2024-12-14 08:12:13+00:00): Bonjour, il y a un problème avec la nouvelle relation 18275496, les arrêts n'ont pas de rôle défini (platform ou stop).
schabanel (2024-12-17 18:48:57+00:00): Salut, 
Corrigé ! Merci !
Sam Vermette (2024-11-16 19:12:37+00:00): Hello it appears you have removed tags that make up the eastbound REV between Papineau and 18e avenue. This now shows up as a primary road.
VLD275 (2024-11-18 16:57:19+00:00): Hello Sam,
Thank you for your comments. I have reviewed and understand the issue I created. I appreciate you bringing this to my attention. Issue has been corrected. I will be mindful of this going forward.
Regards,
Rick.
Glassman (2024-11-12 15:59:57+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159018394
Glassman (2024-11-12 16:00:22+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159018428
Glassman (2024-11-12 16:00:36+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159018511
Glassman (2024-11-12 16:00:49+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159018542
eggie (2024-11-11 19:30:05+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Glassman (2024-11-12 16:01:30+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. Don't forget to square buildings by just selecting the outline then type a "q"
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159018590
woodpeck_repair (2024-12-02 23:54:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 159862440, 159862427, 159862512, 159862481, 159862457, 159862433 where the changeset comment is: revert roblox_gmx edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16954
JezCrow (2024-11-11 18:18:59+00:00): Hi Beacon2025, welcome to OSM. Just wondering why have you deleted this school? It looks like it is still open. I have reverted this edit with changeset 159020585
Doug Lutz (2026-05-22 12:07:22+00:00): In Rockies South, this peak is only referred to as “East Ridge” marked as route 36.  The convention for peak naming would be that “Mount” is followed by a surname that the mountain is named after.  This name of “Mount Burnrock” is not official, so should be more properly named “Burnrock Peak”, and I will be shooting for its summit this weekend.  I will rename the summit in OSM to more properly follow peak naming conventions.  I do think that not naming it “East Ridge” is appropriate, and “Mount Burns East Ridge” already is used as well.
Doug Lutz (2026-05-22 13:06:41+00:00): The Rockies South reference of “Unnamed 2710m” (GR523-138), via East Ridge (route 36) looks unnamed to me, so I’m wondering how it got the name “Mount Burnrock” in OSM as that doesn’t seem to be a transcription from the Jones’ guidebooks (which is what I believe you indicated you had been doing).  Does the summit cairn have “Mount Bluerock” in it with elevation 2710 metres?
brendan714 (2026-05-22 14:13:25+00:00): It is an unofficial name used by those who have seen and/or climbed the mountain. There are absolutely no hard rules on naming things, there are plenty of mountains called "Mount Somethingrandom". We seem to like naming Mounts after battleships in Kananaskis. 

Also note people will often name things without actually having climbed it. Take some of the most famous mountains in the rockies Mount Assiniboine, Mount Temple, Castle Mountain etc as examples. 

Mountain names come and go, what we name the mountains are not what the Stoney people named the mountains. Somebody arbitrarily names it and it sticks. The name really does not matter (in reality you are naming a physical loose pile of rocks), apart from the fact that these days people will use the name to talk about the mountain (and provide trip reports etc). So it usually doesn't make sense to change the name that somebody has already given something as it can lead to confusion.
Doug Lutz (2026-05-22 16:41:35+00:00): Thanks Brendan, so where specifically did you get this name?  Alex Privalov posted a photo to Peakery when he ascended multiple peaks associated with Bluerock Mountain… the name he proffered was “Peak 2701” (I’m confirming with him, but it was likely because “Peak 2700” was already taken in that database).

David Jones’s guidebook shows it as “Unnamed” (I’m going to also check with him for any additional details that he had from Allan Schierman’s FA in July 1988)… If Allan had called the pile of rocks something, I’m sure that David would have referenced that in his guidebook based on my past discussions with him.

I will check with Robin Tivy from bivouac, but his database only references the peak as “GI53” - which means that it is unnamed.

I cannot find any references on the Internet of a “Mount Burnrock”.

You indicate that the name is used by those who have seen and/or climbed the mountain, but I cannot find any indication that people have referenced it in such a way (though many people don’t post stuff online of course).

If I can’t find anything online, and the team this weekend does get to the summit, I will update OSM with whatever they put in the summit register as the name, elevation, and precise location of the summit.
brendan714 (2026-05-22 17:46:46+00:00): This one in particular I climbed many years ago after ascending Bluerock. It's nothing special. It's a straightforward scramble SW along the ridge from Bluerock. Nothing to write home about, a nice addition to the Bluerock scramble. I didn't think much about it at the time. The name obviously references being halfway between Burns and Bluerock. 

Keep in mind there are a lot of people out there who don't post trip reports on the internet, don't place summit registers and don't use summit registers. Me included, I don't care about any of that stuff. I do, however, enjoy using and updating the open map. 

I have climbed a TON of random shit in the rockies that I have named random things on OSM across the years, mostly because it didn't have a name on the map previously. This one is no different. I noticed it was otherwise unnamed when I was going thru the Jones book last year.

Please stop obsessing over the peak names on OSM, ultimately it is a public database with no hard rules on who can add what. I started editing the map over 12 years ago and I have probably added 90+% of the peak names and routes in the Canadian Rockies. At that time there were next to NO peak names or routes on the map. I have always tried to add the well known names for mountains but then make up my own sometimes too when there's no good info available. I didn't realize this would eventually become such a contentious issue for some. 

I would appreciate if you could please stop commenting and emailing me about these types issues, please and thank you.
Kovoschiz (2024-11-11 19:53:27+00:00): `=dormitory` has the problem of being unclear. Especially for universities, they have different apartment designs from disciplined services quarters. `=apartments` should be kept for these as they are no different from other buildings. `building=` is more structural than functional.
Kovoschiz (2024-11-11 20:24:38+00:00): Furthermore, many are constructed to public housing design, then given to disciplined services. So at least they should be `building=apartment` + `building:use=`
Kovoschiz (2024-11-11 20:27:02+00:00): (public or private housing designs)
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-08 04:05:20+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164659356
NorthCrab_upload (2024-11-11 18:01:05+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10613056293
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1332924378

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Thierry1030 (2024-11-12 17:21:19+00:00): ik veronderstel dat dit een "apart gebouw" is ... indien ja, building=yes toevoegen
JezCrow (2024-11-11 18:23:25+00:00): Changesets reverted: 158965605, 158967976, 159018617, 159018766
Langlaeufer (2024-11-12 07:53:14+00:00): Hallo Lelz, sidewalk:left separate war schon richtig. Da gibt es einen separat erfassten Weg neben der Erzwäsche.
Langlaeufer (2024-11-12 07:45:51+00:00): Hallo Lelz, sidewalk:left separate war schon richtig. Da gibt es doch einen separat erfassten weg.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159020655
Sebastian | Yanosik (2024-11-12 07:06:26+00:00): Cześć! 
Przy kończeniu remontów i usunięciu tagu construction, usuwaj także proszę tag opening_date, który jest powiązany z construction. Tag note, który odnosił się do opening_date usunąłeś, ale już samo opening_date z jakiegoś powodu nie ;)
Pozdrawiam!
Silur (2024-11-11 18:38:42+00:00): ...aber was machen wir mit dem Highway-Type? Das ist ja keine Nebenstraße, sondern eine baustellenbedingt lange Autobahnzufahrt mit Ampeln...
rskedgell (2024-11-19 14:11:58+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap. There obviously isn't an enormous building  here, but what were you trying to do?

You might find https://learnosm.org/ useful to get you started.

The building has already been deleted by another user in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159324469
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-06-04 22:55:44+00:00): The only_left_turn restriction forced Riverside Drive traffic to do a U-turn. 
Removed.
BlazingTD (2024-12-27 20:58:56+00:00): All of the trails in this area which you have uploaded are not open to the public and go through both sensitive ecosystem and high arch potential areas which the CRD do not wish open the public to use.  The decision to upload them here where they have now been pulled into Strava and other sources is irresponsible.
eerib (2026-01-06 06:23:24+00:00): Hello all,

I have re-added the trails removed in this region as I was able to confirm that they still are being used. I have marked them as:

highway=path
surface=ground
informal=yes

I was unable to find any legal access restrictions on the CRD website except a general disclaimer to remain on marked trails. If there are access restrictions signs in-person then please add those legal access restriction tags. For example, if there is a sign posted by the CRD saying the trail is closed then you can mark the trail as

access=no

If there are no signs or any other communications marking the trails as closed then you might consider instead marking the trails as

access=discouraged

Discouraged could be applicable here since the CRD mentions on their website "Stay on marked trails" and these are informal unmarked trails. But this is up to local interpretation.

In the future, it is OpenStreetMap policy and best practice to not delete trails, even if they have been closed or have been actively removed. For trails that have been closed you should use a legal access restriction. For trails that have been actively removed you should use a lifecycle prefix. Otherwise the trails may be added back by an unknowing user with even less details.

Cheers, eerib
eggie (2024-11-11 19:34:30+00:00): Hoi,

Je vraagt feedback   Lijkt me oke zo. 
Groet
eggie
MapperMichael32 (2024-11-11 19:48:14+00:00): Top, dankje👍
Arszolek (2024-12-15 00:01:04+00:00): Mały błąd się wdarł. Ulica Reymonta wzdłuż galerii Hosso nie jest jednokierunkowa, jak cos już poprawione ;)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159023442
Arszolek (2024-12-15 00:10:59+00:00): a dobra nieważne xD, ten bład był tu od 10 lat
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159023442
berndw (2024-11-22 08:15:21+00:00): Hallo MaoGuide

Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap

Es ist ist gut, dass Du Dich an der Verbesserung der Daten beteiligen möchtest.

Bitte trage keine Fantasienamen oder -objekte in die Datenbank ein, bitte trage nur Sachen ein, die on the ground nachvollziehbar sind und nicht privat sind.


Ich habe zwei Deiner Changesets nach Hinweis revertiert.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4528672

Für den Fall, dass Du Fragen hast, kannst Du einfach hier antworten.
mcliquid (2024-11-12 09:34:04+00:00): Grüd dich. Lies dir mal die Wiki-Seite von "leisure=common" durch: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure=common

Bist du dir sicher, dass das hier zutrifft? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1330414693
alamero (2024-11-12 10:04:57+00:00): Hm, vielleicht eher nicht. Früher war da mal eine öffentliche Feuerstelle, heute ist es halt eine Kiesfläche am Waldweg. Wie trägt man das am besten ein?
mcliquid (2024-11-12 11:56:07+00:00): Meines Wissens stehen dort mehrere "Parken / Halten verboten"-Schilder und "Müll abladen verboten". Ich habe es mal in highway=track mit area=yes geändert.
dcapillae (2024-11-12 05:32:35+00:00): Buenos días.

Se ha revertido el cambio en el Metro de Málaga. La comunidad española considera que debe etiquetarse como «light_rail», no como «subway». Véase discusión en la lista de correo: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-es/2022-December/018228.html.

Atentamente,
Daniel Capilla
Hidoo00 (2024-12-03 00:28:45+00:00): Hi,
The area is already mapped as an area covered with fine gravel. `natural=shingle` is only used for shingle beaches and the like. As such, I have removed the shingle area, but it would of course be nice if highway areas were rendered directly on osm.org, but this is unfortunately not the case.
Happy mapping!
literan (2024-11-12 18:53:30+00:00): К сожалению, есть ошибки: вы неверно вносите адреску. Перед буквами "с", "к" должен быть пробел. Формат внесения адресов описан здесь:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%90%D0%B4%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%B0#%D0%9D%D1%83%D0%BC%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%B2
mcliquid (2024-11-12 09:50:58+00:00): Der Flixbus 141 und der VMOBIL Bus 135 fahren an der Kreuzung im Kreis. Ich denke das ist nicht gewollt oder?
jeka p (2024-11-12 19:48:42+00:00): Hi!
werde morgen Abend alle 3 Sachen in Ruhe anpassen.
SG
torchlight7 (2024-11-11 20:18:02+00:00): Note that the parking lot remains for now, currently it is planned to be used for Serra Auto Group, but nothing has been done with the lot yet.
快乐的老鼠宝宝-bot (2024-11-11 20:19:17+00:00): OSM.edit([
  "I 🏠 池袋",
  "I ♥ MCD",
]) -> C159024769
bxl-forever (2024-11-12 17:17:42+00:00): Je crois que vous mélangez les bâtiments et les commerces.

One feature, one element, please.
Nicolas312 (2024-11-12 17:21:11+00:00): Bonjour, 
C'est un ami caviste qui a ouvert récemment. 
Donc je suis sûr de la source
bxl-forever (2024-11-12 17:29:55+00:00): This is not what I am talking about.  I am not questionning your sources, I am just saying that shops should not be mixed with building outlines.  If you want to add a business, it is better to add a floating point inside  the building and put the shop-related tags to it.
Don’t bother, I will fix it.

I am also reviewing all the changes you put to the production database in the last hours, to fix as much as I can.
silversurfer83 (2024-11-14 07:38:08+00:00): Moin

"knowledge" ist eine Quelle, kein vollständiger Kommentar :)

cheers
ion_chi (2024-11-11 22:31:26+00:00): I don't think the portion of the cycleway under LSD is tunneled as LSD is already bridged
Tim Grose (2024-11-11 20:58:41+00:00): Hi - how does the new Wisley Road actually connect with the existing road ? When I checked late Saturday how it looked like was going to connect looked unfinished - that is the still in construction bit going straight on ? Will hope to get there tomorrow (Tuesday) to check but could not today.
Tim Grose (2024-11-11 20:59:36+00:00): Sorry Wisley Lane not Road...
kc1 (2024-11-11 21:51:34+00:00): This video from today clarifies it - the connection to the old Wisley lane appears to not be fully complete:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WR4BF9D_1rY
kc1 (2024-11-11 21:52:45+00:00): The relevant part is about at 2:05
Tim Grose (2024-11-11 22:18:19+00:00): Ah thanks - so I think we have between us mapped it right for now. I added the in construction "sort of" mini roundabout from my visit on Saturday PM and was able to walk/run the whole new road with the whole thing to myself. I thought surely they can't open this as not finished but makes more sense now to complete the connection now that part of Wisley Lane is closed. At some point will need to tidy up the cycle path/footpath alongside as at moment is mapped as if it is two entirely disjoint ways.
kc1 (2024-11-11 23:40:46+00:00): Also need to work out what to do with the old road and A3 Junction?  Should it just be deleted?  I've set the new Wisley Lane as a 'Secondary Road' for the moment, but maybe this should be downgraded?  Need to think about where this joins with the old Wisley Lane which is unclassified.  Also I'm not sure what's happening where the footpath near the Standfood Brook bridge crosses the new Wisley Lane
Tim Grose (2024-11-12 00:50:11+00:00): Think should add barrier nodes where presume there are cones to prevent access for now and will become more permanent in time. Then can make the inaccessible section access=no for vehicles and maybe for everybody if no longer allowed on foot etc
Tim Grose (2024-11-12 00:54:03+00:00): When I was there on Saturday it seems there are a number of paths off the new road (including by that bridge) which looked like needed more work to fully complete. Think would need to go and have a proper look.
Tim Grose (2024-11-12 01:00:10+00:00): yeah noticed potential conflict of road classifications. Think the new section is correct as a secondary road but maybe that should stop when gets to RHS Wisley as Wisley Lane heading towards Pyrford is hardly a major road and very narrow in parts.
Tim Grose (2024-11-12 10:18:55+00:00): BTW I made an attempt to do what I said above. Will try and get down there to have a look to see if anything could be done better. It will obviously need to be updated when the proper connection is made which surely can't be far away.