piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
LockOnGuy (2023-10-08 21:53:46+00:00): And these are not on the street signs, so if we gonna remove names that are not on street signs, we should remove all names that are not on the sign.      
In Erbil, the street signs are only in Kurdish sorani 'name:ckb' (Arabic alphabet),      
Arabic 'name:ar', and English 'name:en'.     
Therefore there is no need to name:sdh, name:ku, and other languages as these are not on the street signs.
ڕاستی (2023-10-09 00:41:45+00:00): They are not different languages, those are Kurdish language
LockOnGuy (2023-10-09 00:52:06+00:00): And they are not on the sign.     
Only the names on the street signs should be added, anything not on the street sign and can not be seen or verified by looking at the street sign should not be added to OSM.      
It doesn't matter if it's still Kurdish, we take only what on the sign, as is.      
I will give you example from the other side of the world, for example, Mexico, street signs are in Spanish, but they don't also add Spain's Spanish, same for Brazil, it's Portuguese but they have only Brazil's Portuguese, they don't add Portugal's portuguese, and those 2 examples share the same alphabet! the one you want to keep is a foreign alphabet that is not used in Iraq officially, it's used officially in Turkey, but not Iraq.         
Again, there is no need for languages that is not on the street signs.
ڕاستی (2023-10-11 12:58:44+00:00):  I think you are not want to understand what I say.
I'm saying they the same language, you say another lnguage. And so on.
LockOnGuy (2023-10-11 13:42:18+00:00): No, Kurmanji kurdish is different from Sorani Kurdish. They both “kurdish” but they are not the same..
The first is written in latin, the 2nd written in Arabic.
The first is spoken mostly by Turkish Kurds, the 2nd by Iraqi Kurds.
And Sorani people can not understand most of the Kurmanji and most of Kurmanji people don’t understand Sorani.
Anyway, even if it’s the same, its not on the ground. Its not on the street signs.
Regards.    
       

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kurdish_languages
CurlingMan13 (2023-10-05 00:24:49+00:00): Rather than mapping trees as small circles, you should use nodes/points to map the trees.
rbrundritt (2023-10-05 02:39:55+00:00): I originally planned to do that but read somewhere that the nodes for trees was only meant for notable trees. I'd prefer to use nodes for individual trees. I can go through and update this area tomorrow.
CurlingMan13 (2023-10-05 04:56:10+00:00): So if it is a forrest, yes, tree nodes should not be used.  But in this case, you are trying to do something in detail, so rather than creating a bunch of tine "natural woods" areas the size of one tree, a node would suffice.

You probably read it here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dtree#:~:text=species%3D*%20tag.-,Evolution%20of%20use,-Initially%20this%20tag

Nodes are acceptable in golf mapping, as long as it isn't excessive, such as mapping all the trees in a forrest as nodes, or using it where there are so many trees, you can't precisely (or close enough) place the individual nodes.

Also, welcome to OSM!  Looking at the rest of the golf course, it seems you avoided most of the other common pitfalls when mapping a golf course. ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#:~:text=the%20building%20itself.-,Common%20mapping%20pitfalls,-Adding%20name%3D* ) You are even using multi-polygon relations!  Though, there isn't always a need for it.
km2bp (2023-10-04 21:18:30+00:00): Add Photo http://openpoimap.org/?map=various&zoom=16&lat=51.20635&lon=3.22108&layers=B00FFFFFFFFFFFFFTFFFFFF
aTarom (2024-03-31 11:07:23+00:00): Hello, thanks for editing, a question please, why add the value of ele to the name?
one of the examples:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6905625280/history
Cheers
gscscnd (2023-10-05 07:42:36+00:00): building=garage to tylko rodzaj budynku, jeśli ktoś tutaj prowadzi oficjalną działalność, to przydałby się np. tag:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dcar_repair
LockOnGuy (2023-10-05 00:03:00+00:00): Hello again ,     
I see you changed the name of n4486255700 here, but the name you changed it into is not on the hotel, see: http://bot.gov.krd/sites/default/files/accuImages/725.jpg     
What is your source for this change?           
Regards.
ڕاستی (2023-10-07 22:06:58+00:00): Yes, that was the old name. But now it is changed to what I write down.
LockOnGuy (2023-10-07 22:10:43+00:00): Can you specify the source please? Like survey you saw it? Or someone on some social media app? Please provide the source for name changes so we know if this is ok or not ok to use.. 
regards.
ڕاستی (2023-10-23 02:24:09+00:00): I survey this place about a month ago.
Branko Kokanovic (2023-10-06 17:27:41+00:00): Pogledaj zgradu https://openstreetmap.org/way/770368201. RGZ kaze broj 37, a ti si stavio u aprilu broj 29. To je OK. Medjutim, sad si stavio ref:RS:kucni_broj, pa se sad izvestaj zali da se ref i broj ne slazu, a ja nisam siguran kako da popravim ovo. Ili je broj tacan (ti si to video u aprilu) i treba izbrisati ref, ili je broj netacan, pa onda treba ostaviti ref i promeniti broj. Sta mislis?
nik994 (2023-10-08 06:15:18+00:00): Управо гледам и зграду поред: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/770368198
За ову улицу сам сигуран да нисам био на терену, тако да су ово највероватније подаци из РГЗ-а (на терену су највероватније други подаци, пошто се у овом насељу ништа не поклапа са РГЗ-ом). Иначе, приметио сам на неколико места да је РГЗ у међувремену променио бројеве, па оно што сам унео раније се не поклапа са текућим подацима. Искрено, мислим да је можда боље да се промени број, али могу да проверим на терену каква је ситуација.
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2023-10-05 02:38:26+00:00): Hello, thank you for refining in this place, I noticed your changeset comment have a hashtag #RelationsCleanup, so I'm curious about how did you found broken or need-to-repair relations?
VLD194 (2023-10-05 22:11:56+00:00): Hello @快乐的老鼠宝宝, thank you for reaching out and taking a concern with relations. I work for Meta and we have internal tools that query for broken relations on OSM for our team to fix and improve.
WoodWoseWulf (2023-10-07 22:43:13+00:00): Hello, this feature was already on the map. You also used the incorrect name for this park of the waterfront.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/482766136
WoodWoseWulf (2023-10-07 22:41:09+00:00): Hello, this feature was already on the map: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/50160997
Kovoschiz (2023-11-27 08:43:43+00:00): Please don't add estates and developments as `place=` . This causes inconsistency in both `landuse=` and `place=` .
Glassman (2023-10-05 17:59:33+00:00): It looks like Kohl's was already tagged using the building outline. You might want to merge your node with the building.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142167616
Norhash (2023-10-11 02:37:09+00:00): I read message after reading the others. I will stop doing this to remain consistent with how everyone else is using OSM in this area. Thanks
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142167616
Glassman (2023-10-05 18:01:51+00:00): If a business occupies the entire building, we typically just tag the building outline and not use a separate node. Can you review this changeset and merge duplicate nodes and buildings? I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142167776
rene78 (2023-10-07 04:43:54+00:00): Hi cnvery,

why did you delete wikimedia_commons=Category:Maxis Tower?

Regards
Rene
cnvery (2024-12-08 04:40:03+00:00): Hi Rene (rene78), 

Sorry this is wrongly deleted.

I've re-added it back.

Thanks for highlighting!
gscholz (2023-10-06 06:11:38+00:00): Hi adiatmad,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=71.37130&lat=30.12233&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way


https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=142168231

Especially way 539933951 is affected here:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/539933951

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
adiatmad (2023-10-06 08:37:14+00:00): Hello Guido,
My apologies for the oversight. Thank you for bringing it to my attention. Before proceeding, I'd like to discuss it with you. I plan to revert this way (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/539933951) to the previous changeset, but it doesn't work. What's your advice on this?
Thank you
gscholz (2023-10-06 08:56:23+00:00): Hi adiatmad,
you have to select only the nodes of this way and revert the changeset partly. I just did this here:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142222156

Guido
adiatmad (2023-10-07 10:07:45+00:00): Amazing, thank you for your tips and for your help on this.

Kind regards,
adiatmad
muchichka_s (2023-10-05 08:54:14+00:00): Привіт,
для амбулаторій краще робити "Лікар первинної ланки" замість "Клініка":
________________________________
amenity=doctors
healthcare=doctor
healthcare:speciality=general
________________________________

Клініка - заклади де є лікарі декількох спеціалізацій, але немає стаціонару. До прикладу поліклініки чи приватні заклади з різними лікарями
sdvm (2023-10-05 14:06:07+00:00): Зрозумів. Дякую
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-07 00:07:21+00:00): Fix incorrect reversion

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142251971
mcliquid (2023-10-05 12:12:00+00:00): Hi, warum hast du den bestehenden Node von Doren gelöscht und stattdessen einen neuen erstellt? Was ist der Vorteil davon?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142169256
BodhidharmaI (2023-10-06 16:45:41+00:00): Because “village” is a standalone object, and not a property of one of the corners of the building.
mcliquid (2023-10-06 17:36:36+00:00): I see. In JOSM you could have separated the node from the building with Alt + J. That would have been nicer for the history.
BodhidharmaI (2023-10-06 21:34:22+00:00): Not much history to maintain there. And not every OSM editor is like JOSM either
Kai Johnson (2023-11-01 14:42:19+00:00): Hi! This changeset deleted some relevant tags from relation/6082213. Could I ask you to restore that information?
tekim (2024-03-05 01:19:44+00:00): Hello, thanks for the edits, however, for legal reasons, we are not allowed to use Google Street View when editing OSM.
Allison P (2023-10-13 19:57:41+00:00): The parking lot is not named "RV Parking". That is a description.
nevw (2023-10-05 06:40:20+00:00): Hi, I changed the tags to be cricket pitches for the three circular areas
Fraxi (2023-10-05 09:14:42+00:00): Здравейте, diffER! Благодаря за корекцията! Трябва обаче да Ви кажа, че не трябва да ползваме данни от защитени с авторски права или "propietary" източници. Какъвто се явява и google maps.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Copyright#Proprietary_data
Warin61 (2023-10-07 05:28:07+00:00): 2 relations for the bridge deleted. One old way made into the bridge and made into a simple closed way.

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dbridge for correct bridge tagging.
Sajeevini sivajothy (2024-06-23 07:59:55+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work, and it looks good.#OMGuru#OSMCha
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142170807
tastrax (2023-10-05 07:08:36+00:00): Please try for more explicit changeset comments such as "Updated houses and roads around Maubara"
Langlaeufer (2023-10-05 14:40:33+00:00): Das oneway:bicycle wird eigentlich nur als Ausnahme zu oneway=yes bei Einbahnstraßen benötigt. Auf paht,cycleway,footway kannst du gefahrlos einfach "oneway" einsetzen, da es nur auf Fahrzeuge (und das sind dort nur Fahrräder) wirkt.

Grüße
Langläufe
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142171598
BER319 (2023-10-05 17:24:03+00:00): Hallo Langläufer,

ich bin mir immer etwas unsicher bei oneway, aber diese Eselsbrücke "da es nur auf Fahrzeuge wirkt" ist super. Das werde ich mir merken.

Habe es wieder rückgängig gemacht.

BER319
user_5359 (2023-10-05 07:47:54+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I remove your SEO SPAM entry (mostly foreign keys). Please have a look on https://wiki.osm.org!
MxxCon (2023-10-07 02:01:26+00:00): Hello.
Consider installing josm's NSI preset so that it'll automatically fill in all the appropriate brand tags.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142172063
juliencherry (2023-10-07 17:33:15+00:00): Ah, I didn’t know about that, thanks!
wielandb (2023-10-25 12:20:18+00:00): Hey Max :)

In StreetComplete gibt es unter "Weitere Antworten" die möglichkeit zu sagen "Der ganze Bahnsteig ist überdacht". Das wäre hier auch die bessere Antwort gewesen, immerhin gibt es am Bahnsteig selbst keinen Unterstand. :)

Viele Grüße,
Wieland
elsy1 (2023-10-05 09:40:27+00:00): درود، چه چیز این جاده به درجه سوم میخوره که شما این تگ رو بهش دادید اگر منبع معتبر مثل عکس یا ازاین قبیل دارید کامنت کنید وگرنه برگشت داده میشه
marczoutendijk (2023-11-04 20:34:11+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/164570918
the surface= tag is supposed to contain the type of the surface, not its size (area) in m2!
Please see: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:surface
marczoutendijk (2023-11-04 20:39:22+00:00): Also see:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/164582241
Frans S (2023-10-05 09:16:39+00:00): Hi Esther,
You know how to map a building with a courtyard inside?
Where clearly visible, add courtyards, please.
This is how to map a building with courtyards.

 1   Draw the outer outline of the building as an area. Tag as a building
 2  Draw each of the inner courtyards/plazas as areas. Tag as building as well.
 3  Hold 'SHIFT' and select all the areas
 4  Press 'C' to create a multipolygon with all the areas
 Best regards
marczoutendijk (2023-11-04 20:35:44+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/164571909
the surface= tag is supposed to contain the type of the surface, not its size (area) in m2!
Please see: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:surface
Langlaeufer (2023-10-05 20:17:55+00:00): Das ist Kopfsteinpflaster (unhewn_cobblestone)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142174454
Langlaeufer (2023-10-05 20:20:30+00:00): BTW: Willkommen bei OSM und Danke für deine Korrektur. Grüße Langläufer
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142174454
st1TKvTFu2wdIbU6lqCp (2023-10-05 20:30:42+00:00): Ah gut zu wissen. Nächstes mal schau ich mir die Doku davor besser an :)
MxxCon (2023-10-07 02:04:46+00:00): Hello.
Please note this edit will be reverted. This building's name is 33 Thomas Street.
"AT&T Long Lines Building" was its previous name and it is already encoded in old_name= tag.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142175132
Jerome-Herbinet (2023-11-18 15:04:09+00:00): OK, thanks for the information, and sorry for that. 
Have a nice day.
Jerome
Friendly_Ghost (2023-10-09 16:00:45+00:00): Hello Flayer. Please provide meaningful comments for your changesets to make it easier for other mappers to see what is going on.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Langlaeufer (2023-10-05 14:41:37+00:00): Danke :)
arjunaraoc (2024-01-03 01:17:35+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).

Check my update for fixing issues: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145819610

Happy mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142176396
gendy54 (2023-10-20 13:51:08+00:00): camping en doublon
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142176591
map per (2023-10-26 12:25:03+00:00): Hallo Opa Razzi,

und wilkommen bei OpenStreetMap!

Ist die "Jägerhütte"(1) die du eingezeichnet hast wirklich eine öffentliche Schutzhütte in der man schlafen darf (vgl. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:tourism%3Dwilderness_hut)?

Danke und viele Grüße
map per

(1) https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11240630437
map per (2023-11-03 13:46:50+00:00): Hab den fragwürdigen Eintrag von der Karte entfernt
aceman444 (2025-03-09 14:36:28+00:00): Dakujem za opravu. To ref=3 malo byt lanes=3 :)
user_5359 (2023-10-05 18:14:22+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I remove your SEO SPAM entry (mostly foreign keys). Please have a look on https://wiki.osm.org!
opendcc (2023-10-05 19:01:36+00:00): Hallo und willkommen auf OpenStreetMap und viel Spass.

Eine kleine Anmerkung: der name-Tag ist wirklich nur der Eigenname eines Objektes - nicht die Bewohner oder ev. eine Eigenschaft. Auch wenn man das vielleicht da gerne in der Karte lesen möchte ;-) Also bei einem Gebäude kann das z.B. 'Hofbräuhaus' sein oder bei einer Straße 'Heutauer Str.', nicht aber 'Bundesstraße'.

Ich habe mir daher erlaubt, den Namen vom Gebäude wieder wegzunehmen.

Servus
RicoElectrico (2023-11-06 18:42:39+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3975273
eggie (2023-10-05 11:04:06+00:00): Dag Hans,

Lijkt me oke om die breedtebeperking te overrulen..   even er van uitgaande dat LiveOp er zo mee omgaat. 
Je nog evt een note=... kunnen toevoegen dat bredere wagens van hulpdiensten er toch toegang hebben .
MVG
eggie
Lostmonkey (2023-12-17 15:01:52+00:00): Hvorfor legeplads? Der er ingen legeredskaber og det kaldes for 'Stranden'.
kortgodt (2023-12-17 18:55:46+00:00): https://jyllands-posten.dk/jpaarhus/ECE16415751/kommunen-brugte-5-mio-kr-paa-en-flydende-strand-men-det-har-ikke-vist-sig-saa-interessant-alligevel/
Lostmonkey (2023-12-17 19:00:19+00:00): Er ikke abonnent. Står der at det bliver en legeplads? Der er ikke noget, der ligner en legeplads pt.
kortgodt (2023-12-17 19:22:21+00:00): Ja står at den omdannes til legeplads i den nærmeste fremtid artiklen er fra 11. september i år. En sandkasse er vel også en form for legeplads i deres forsvar.
Vinber-Pro (2024-02-16 09:21:43+00:00): Bonjour,
merci pour toutes ces contributions.

je pense cependant que les colonnes (ecopoint ?) sont plutôt de type container que centre comme tu les as indiqué.

je vais sans doute faire un passage dessus pour les basculer en recycling:type=container ?

est-ce que cela te parait correct, censé ?

à plus
MyEaL (2024-02-16 23:06:24+00:00): Bonjour,
Effectivement le type container sera plus approprié
@plus
Syl (2023-10-05 13:03:07+00:00): Bonjour, les piscines supprimées étaient marquées comme étant privées. Est-ce que les deux nouvelles le sont aussi ? Ce n'est pas précisé.
Syl (2023-10-09 10:19:57+00:00): Merci d'avoir corrigé.
Warin61 (2023-12-02 02:11:49+00:00): Hi,
Way 1213250878 has addr:interpolation=even yet contains one odd addr????
Vadmium (2023-12-02 02:42:52+00:00): Thanks, I fixed it. Looks like it was a copy and paste error of mine.
Warin61 (2024-08-28 01:17:52+00:00): layer=-1 implies these footways are below the roads they cross... Wrong.
Lockstar (2024-09-02 11:44:17+00:00): I've worked out what happened here.  Where footways cross through or under buildings, OSM prompts a response (above or below) and setting the layer.  Ways need to be split so only the section under/within the building is layer=-1
Warin61 (2024-09-03 08:55:04+00:00): The convention is layer=0 is 'ground level' .. The foot path would be ground level? So the building would be layer=1 - above ground???
UNGSC-DTLM-Ale_Zena (2024-06-21 10:31:40+00:00): Hello,
please note natural=shrub is not a valid tag, Use natural=scrub instead

Cheers,
  Alessandro
KingVik (2024-06-22 18:10:35+00:00): Alright, thank you for calling my attention
eggie (2023-10-05 10:54:09+00:00): Dag Tisaraloma,

Geef svp aan wat je aanpast. 
De situatie heb ik aangepast naar motor_vehicle=no ipv access=no.
De doorsteek kruiste het fietspad. Dat gaf een foutmelding. Nu aangepast. 
De straatnaam Doorsteek Wipperplein bestaat niet. Die heb ik aangepast naar description=
Stukje fietspad op emergency=no gezet. 
Het zal nu correct routering in liveOp.

MVG
eggie
OttoR (2023-10-06 08:35:21+00:00): hi, 
Heb de emegency doorsteek doorgetrokken naar het water en aangegeven dat dit een vulpunt is voor de brandweer.

Daarnaast de flatgebouwen en onderliggende parkeergarage ingetekend. 

Ik weet; theoretisch is het geen ondergrondse parkeergarge; maar visueel is het een park met flatgebouwen en niet één groot gebouw.
eggie (2023-10-06 09:07:21+00:00): Mooi.. vroeg me al af wat het doel van die doorsteek was.
Groet
eggie
divaddivag (2023-10-05 10:13:37+00:00): Bonjour rt112, à ce rythme là tu vas planter les outils de contrôle qualité d'OSM! Ils existent afin qu'OSM reste cohérent et fonctionnel. L'état d'OSM dans le secteur du Molay est questionnable et il serait judicieux de passer un peu plus de temps sur le wiki et apprécier la diversités des réutilisations, rendus ou applications pour comprendre le sens des tags et plus largement ce qu'un projet collaboratif comme OSM est. Il existe aussi un forum, un canal telegram et une liste de diffusion pour s'informer et demander de l'aide.
Bonne journée D
arjunaraoc (2023-12-12 13:40:57+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia) Issue fixed vide https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145038424
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142180775
Firefishy (2023-10-08 02:26:37+00:00): I've updated the details. The description was a bit spammy. See: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7098962129
Dodko (2023-10-06 08:29:41+00:00): Adresu 421/18 netrebalo meniť na 18.
Frans S (2023-10-05 15:45:01+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
A remark about tagging of highways.
You tag short roads leading to a farm as a track. Please refresh your knowledge how to tag. 
Tracks are to be used as access to fields, woods, water.
Best regards
Waaslander (2023-10-05 15:07:30+00:00): Durmedijk ;)
JanFi (2023-10-05 17:30:04+00:00): oeps.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-06-04 11:07:07+00:00): Zerkniesz na https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4789599 ?
Marek-M (2023-10-05 11:19:07+00:00): Cześć, drogi gminne mają numer w postaci 6 cyfr + 1 litera a tutaj 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/375393123 dorzuciłeś 2 litery przed numerem (unsigned_ref=DG121032G). Podejrzewam, że DG, to skrót od Droga Gminna, który nie powinien trafić do ref w OSM.
Szymson (2023-10-06 10:50:31+00:00): Poprawiłem:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142226955
DeKaN (2023-10-05 12:44:06+00:00): Город автоматически добавляется для всех зданий внутри его границ, не добавляйте его.
prinst12 (2023-10-05 11:09:35+00:00): Hoi Eggie,

Ik zie dat je mijn bewerking hebt aangepast. Heb ik iets niet goed gedaan?
eggie (2023-10-05 11:23:23+00:00): Hoi..
Yep.. het zit vol addertjes.
Je doorsteek kruiste de fietsoversteek.
Dus de doorsteek iets opgeschoven.
Er staat (stond?) een G12 bord.. dus motor_vehicle=no. Geen oneway=yes
name= .. alleen voor straatnamen gebruiken. Geen omschrijving.
In de praktijk zullen de wagens het fietspad een stukje volgen en vervolgens doorsteken naar de hoofdrijbaan.
Het zal hier alleen voor hulpdiensten routeren.
Groet..
eggie
eggie (2023-10-05 11:29:10+00:00): In deze changeset heb ik alleen oneway=no toegevoegd en een stukje oneway=yes aangepast op de fietspaden.
prinst12 (2023-10-05 11:38:36+00:00): Oké, top. 
Fijn, bedankt weer voor je hulp.
Barroszt (2024-06-29 23:45:18+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Znakowanie_dr%C3%B3g_w_Polsce#Nazewnictwo_ulic
jvazquel_sitna-import (2023-10-05 16:48:54+00:00): No es corrección por duplicado.
StellanL (2023-10-05 19:52:31+00:00): Omledningen av E4 avslutades för några veckor sedan och håller nu på attt rivas.
Pavans (2023-10-06 09:20:33+00:00): Thank you for giving valuable suggestion/feedback. I had reverted the changes.

Regards, 
Pavans