piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2026-04-16 12:51:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13734637832 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Beauty studio"

#MapWithoutSpam
literan (2026-04-16 19:48:07+00:00): вы отрисовали здание поверх забора. Исправьте, пожалуйста
Ozon OSM16 (2026-04-17 20:23:04+00:00): Добрый вечер, ошибку исправила, спасибо, что указали
NeisBot (2026-04-16 13:15:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 30 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/15133841 v7 | 4 crossings
https://osm.org/way/15170016 v6 | 4 crossings
https://osm.org/way/632352233 v3 | 4 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/149550980 v3
https://osm.org/node/5970855691 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=181413408
NeisBot (2026-04-16 13:15:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13734712468 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Training center"

#MapWithoutSpam
joost schouppe (2026-04-21 10:21:06+00:00): En ook hier: gebouw kapot, dubbel gemaakt. Een café in de Vlaamse volksmond is overigens geen amenity=cafe (een koffiehuis) maar een amenity=pub (een kroeg)
arjunaraoc (2026-05-09 13:08:19+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181413496
eggie (2026-04-16 13:47:54+00:00): Dag evelk,

Is hier geen uitzondering op oneway yes voor fietsers.
..oneway:bicycle=no ?
Groet,
eggie
evelk (2026-04-16 14:22:36+00:00): Ja, goed om die uitzondering er ook bij op te nemen. Inmiddels verwerkt.
evelk (2026-04-16 14:27:23+00:00): In ieder geval is de praktijksituatie dat fietsers beide kanten op rijden. Op basis van de borden uit de D-serie (verplichte rijrichting) die ter plaatse staan, zou er ook voor fietsers 1 richtingsverkeer gelden.
eggie (2026-04-16 14:27:35+00:00): 👍
eggie (2026-04-16 14:30:38+00:00): Nou.. in dat geval beter de uitzondering verwijderen.
In OSM kunnen we niet zelf interpreteren of gedogen.
Haal je de uitzondering weer weg? 😀
Groet,
eggie
evelk (2026-04-16 14:57:18+00:00): 👍
ChrissW-R1 (2026-04-17 19:13:16+00:00): Which are these empty multipolygons?

https://osm.org/relation/20455651
https://osm.org/relation/20455652
arjunaraoc (2026-05-09 13:30:57+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181413763
joost schouppe (2026-04-21 10:18:48+00:00): Zelfde opmerking opnieuw: gebouw kapot, dubbel POI
Wildsharky (2026-04-17 12:21:22+00:00): Revert of 181393293
Adam Franco (2026-04-16 13:27:52+00:00): Oops, the turning loop is actually just over the Town line in Colchester, but a similar 25 mph unposted limit probably still applies.
Adikso (2026-04-16 16:34:25+00:00): Opis zestawu zmian powinien opisywać co zostało zmienione
NeisBot (2026-04-16 13:36:15+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your changesets and noticed that the cumulative count of your recent edits (6 changesets) shows that 334 of your last 348 changes were deletions. This is quite an unusual proportion, so I wanted to check with you.

Could you please confirm whether these deletions were intentional or if they may have occurred by mistake?

#DeletionsCheck #Cumulative
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?uid=8834258
arjunaraoc (2026-05-09 13:32:47+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181414092
arjunaraoc (2026-05-09 13:34:27+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181414286
arjunaraoc (2026-05-09 13:34:30+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181414286
eggie (2026-04-16 15:19:11+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback   Rood Wit doet niets in OSM.  
Ik heb er nu even =red van gemaakt. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
NeisBot (2026-04-16 13:36:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 20 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/643891596 v5 | 12 crossings
https://osm.org/way/758999822 v2 | 8 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/6058295822 v7

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=181414420
iandees (2026-04-16 14:53:24+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6058295822 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181418249, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
joost schouppe (2026-04-20 07:43:20+00:00): Ik heb die leisure=events_venue weggehaald, dat bestaat volgens mij niet
Robin On Wheels (2026-04-20 11:55:34+00:00): Ok, denk ook niet dat wij die tag gebruiken
arjunaraoc (2026-05-09 13:35:18+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181414536
arjunaraoc (2026-05-09 13:40:27+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181414541
arjunaraoc (2026-05-09 13:44:25+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). natural=cape feature should be connected to land.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181414661
arjunaraoc (2026-06-28 05:06:05+00:00): The issue is fixed by deleting by the reviewer
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181414661
arjunaraoc (2026-05-09 13:46:47+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check my updates to your edits
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181414778
Bienson (2026-04-17 00:16:51+00:00): Korrigiert in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181435383
VictorIE (2026-06-20 06:14:38+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1499899079/

I'm NOT sure who created this issue first or how it was created, but incline=80 is exceptionally steep, do you mean 1/80? Or maybe maxspeed=80?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:incline?uselang=en-GB

There are about 28 instances of it in 4 groups. https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2rWf
b-unicycling (2026-06-21 23:46:18+00:00): presumably the maxspeed is meant, yes
arjunaraoc (2026-05-09 13:52:45+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Two separate buildings very close to one another can not have same house number.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181415173
arjunaraoc (2026-06-28 05:09:45+00:00): Thanks for cleanup.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181415173
joost schouppe (2026-04-21 10:17:05+00:00): Zelfde opmerking weeral: gebouw kapot gemaakt, bestaand hotel gedupliceerd...
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-16 16:06:40+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

Is the following road name real?
"local way"

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/215343589
Bienson (2026-04-17 00:21:41+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181435486 - Korrekte ALKIS Umrisse des Feuerwehrhauses wiederhergestellt (siehe iD-Bildmaterial "NRW Liegenschaftskataster"). Der Bodelschwingher Dorfplatz ist wohl auch nicht nur ein stinknormaler Parkplatz. Und der Vorplatz der Feuerwehr kein place=square.
NeisBot (2026-04-16 14:12:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/1499905958 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Residential tower"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisAgent (2026-04-16 16:33:32+00:00): 🕵 The changeset tags appear to reference Google as a data source.

Please note that using Google Maps, Google Street View, or similar Google services as a mapping source is not allowed in OpenStreetMap due to license restrictions.

More information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google

If the data in this changeset was derived from Google or another incompatible source, the edits may need to be reverted.

If this is a misunderstanding and the data was collected from permitted sources (e.g. local survey, Bing imagery, local knowledge, etc.), please clarify in a reply.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-16 11:09:50+00:00): Reverted adding SEO POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags, likely sourced from Google Maps, in changeset 184176329

https://osm.org/changeset/184176329
joost schouppe (2026-04-21 10:15:33+00:00): Je hebt hier een nieuwe slager gezet op het bestaande gebouw, terwijl die reeds als punt gemapped was. Daarbij heb je gewist dat het om een gebouw gaat (waar toevallig een kapper in zit). De meeste info stond reeds op het punt.
Ik heb een en ander gefixed, en de nieuwe info die je op het gebouw had gezet aan het punt gehangen.
NeisBot (2026-04-16 14:18:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13732850733 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Dog training facility"

#MapWithoutSpam
bxl-forever (2026-04-16 14:35:46+00:00): Hello,

Since you are attempting to change the map in the entire world, it would be beneficial to all if you could please improve the wording of the changeset descriptions when you upload data.

From what I understood here, you added the "name:wal" tag to several countries. (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name:wal is for the Wolaytta language, which is spoken in some parts of Ethiopia.)

Thanks and happy mapping.
joost schouppe (2026-04-21 10:12:30+00:00): Je hebt hier een nieuwe kapper gezet op het bestaande gebouw, terwijl die reeds als punt gemapped was. Daarbij heb je gewist dat het om een gebouw gaat (waar toevallig een kapper in zit). De meeste info stond reeds op het punt.
Ik heb een en ander gefixed, en de nieuwe info die je op het gebouw had gezet aan het punt gehangen.
NeisBot (2026-04-16 14:21:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 22 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1499884153 v3 | 9 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/13734666540 v2
https://osm.org/node/13734709686 v2
https://osm.org/node/13734666576 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=181416602
ChrissW-R1 (2026-04-17 19:13:17+00:00): Which are these empty multipolygons?

https://osm.org/relation/20455856
https://osm.org/relation/20455857
NeisBot (2026-04-16 14:24:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13733195433 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Insurance agency"

#MapWithoutSpam
thopf (2026-04-16 15:44:36+00:00): Ich denke nicht, dass bridge:structure=floating hier korrekt ist. Die einzige schwimmende Brücke (Pontonbrücke) die ich in Graz kenne, ist die Murinsel.
berthold_kaps (2026-04-16 16:02:19+00:00): Danke, da habe ich das Bild falsch interpretiert.
felipeeugenio (2026-04-16 20:07:13+00:00): Hola. Otro tip: las construcciones puede cuadrarlas conla letra Q. Estas se notas que están hechas a mano.

Otro tema. por favor hacer ediciones pequeñas, aunque sean muchas.

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181416981
felipeeugenio (2026-04-16 20:08:14+00:00): y por favor no agrupar casas en un dibujo esquemático. dibujamos cada estructura por separado. saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181416981
felipeeugenio (2026-04-16 20:11:32+00:00): Otro tema: por favor consultar con la comunidad el ingreso de caminos enrolados por el MOP. En este caso, la ruta 667 no es la que dibujó.

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181416981
eggie (2026-04-16 15:22:28+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback .. Ik heb amenity=doctors toegevoegd. Daar kan OSM wat mee.
CTRL F5 voor het effect.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
NeisBot (2026-04-16 14:36:17+00:00): 🌍 Welcome to OSM, Manireddy!.
Thanks for contributing!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

✅ Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added restaurant amenity, named location "MY Home""
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment
felipeeugenio (2026-04-16 19:59:04+00:00): Hola. El Tag building es para las estructuras, no para el recinto completo. Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181417258
YomanNH (2026-04-17 19:47:56+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
Eduardo17172 (2026-04-16 21:31:17+00:00): Hola, toda esta calle parece ser unidireccional dada las señales instaladas y la forma en que se posicionan los autos. Por que sería bidireccional? 

Hello, this whole street seems to be one-way given the signs and the way the cars are positioned. Why should it be two-way?
dvillas (2026-04-17 22:09:36+00:00): Hello Eduardo17172,

Thank you for bringing this to my attention. After reviewing recent satellite imagery I agree that this segment of Sierra street looks like a oneway heading northbound. I initially removed the oneway tag due to vehicles I saw parked facing both directions.

Warms regards, 
dvillas
Eduardo17172 (2026-04-18 19:06:18+00:00): Ok, I already fixed it
NeisBot (2026-04-16 14:48:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13734875513 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Constructora de reformas"
---
Por ejemplo, una versión más neutral y objetiva de tu texto podría ser: "Constructora de reformas"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
demon_box (2026-04-16 15:10:22+00:00): Ciao Trapano_, relativamente a questi 2 oggetti che hai appena modificato:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1499915608

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/139732773

ti segnalo che in Italia il civico identifica il punto di accesso (entrata) e NON l'intero edificio. Infatti un edificio può avere più entrate e di conseguenza più numeri civici. 
Quindi hai 2 opzioni: 
1. Se conosci esattamente la posizione (entrata) del civico che stai mappando metti tutti i tags dell'indirizzo su un nodo del perimetro dell'edificio (aggiungendo anche il tag entrance sullo stesso nodo);
2. Se invece non hai questa informazione così precisa devi mettere tutti i tags dell'indirizzo su nodo adiacente ma STACCATO dal poligono dell'edificio.
Ho già proceduto con le correzioni del caso. 
Grazie e BuonMapping!
arjunaraoc (2026-05-09 14:00:44+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181418007
Lejun (2026-04-16 20:08:30+00:00): Prière d'éviter le bourrage d'informations dans le nom. Dans le doute une note est préférable, quelqu'un passera par là pour mettre les attributs adéquats.
eggie (2026-04-16 15:23:37+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-04-16 15:26:40+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback   .. Probeer het gebied van je edits klein te houden. Doe zoiets in meerder uploads. Schuiven met de kaart geeft vaak schade door onbedoelde verplaatsingen van objecten. 
Ook controleren van je edits wordt lastig zo.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-04-16 15:33:29+00:00): Ik heb wat paden losgemaakt van de landuse. Dat plakken kun je voorkomen door de linker alttoets te gebruiken tijdens intekenen.
Je edits https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=181418190#16/51.8567/5.7823
MVG
eggie
arjunaraoc (2026-05-09 14:04:07+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check my updates
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181418311
Wildsharky (2026-04-21 03:35:52+00:00): Revert of 181393172
Taya_S (2026-04-16 15:01:12+00:00): The following changesets have been reverted: 181410435, 181410386, 181409774, 181408553, 181408019, 181405795
Taya_S (2026-04-16 15:01:05+00:00): The following changesets have been reverted: 181410435, 181410386, 181409774, 181408553, 181408019, 181405795
Wildsharky (2026-04-21 03:31:51+00:00): Revert of 181413408
rskedgell (2026-04-17 09:03:53+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for updating this.

I've restored the original access tags and removed the construction area/fences in
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181447154

It may take a few weeks for these changes to propagate to routing services based on OSM data.
NeisBot (2026-04-16 15:19:33+00:00): Hello IVRInovação, welcome to OSM, and thank you for your contributions!

I've taken a look at your recent edits and wanted to discuss a few discrepancies I noticed regarding the surrounding environmental features. Specifically, the locations in your edits don't seem to align with the typical geographical characteristics expected in that area. Here are some (max 10) relevant links to the edits:
https://osm.org/node/13734947395

Could you please take a look?
Looking forward to your response.

#Somewhere
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=181419302
alaaan021 (2026-04-16 15:35:08+00:00): Olá. Confundiu a rua que queria editar? Esse não é o nome da rua que alterou. E se apenas estiver escrito errado, qual o critério pra uma das vias mais importantes de volta redonda não poder ser considerada primary? 

Valeu!