piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
CtI5UDYpRmUS (2025-12-16 07:29:13+00:00): When your import plan have approved by the community and followed import guidelines, you can use conflation plugin of JOSM to conflate your orphaned untagged node with your imported objects, in this case, buildings, as part of building nodes to keep these nodes without creating redundant nodes
Thank you
CtI5UDYpRmUS (2025-12-16 07:35:02+00:00): And you may need clarify the source data to import and ensure the license of the source data is compatible with OSM (open data license or public domain)
MxxCon (2025-12-24 18:27:31+00:00): Did you run your revert already? It seems like this edit created a ton of empty nodes with no ways attached to it. Is it a bad import or a bad revert?
BMACS001 (2025-12-24 21:44:39+00:00): It's both, taking care of it now (and hopefully it works this time)
Fen <3 (2025-12-16 02:04:55+00:00): Hello! Thank you for contributing! It looks like the tags for the street were slightly incorrect, I've went ahead and fixed it and added the gate to the road
Thank you!
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2025-12-17 06:29:13+00:00): 您好，注意到您删除了一个已经存在的有很多标签的已经存在的黄山保护区的轮廓

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/587045603

然后才是添加了您的这个黄山风景区的轮廓

可能您认为您获得的数据能更准确的定义黄山风景区的位置，但原来的是否有错？这些标签存在的情况下它不应该被轻易删除，应该如何处理这些标签呢？我觉得您在删除之前应该明白这将删除一个明显被公认存在的地物，在没有明确依据的情况下我们不应该这么做
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2025-12-17 06:37:37+00:00): 我恢复了这个您删除的轮廓，至于另一个您新建的和它是什么关系，希望您能做出回应
小智智 (2026-02-04 13:06:54+00:00): Sorry what did you do to the steps? The map is wrong now and I have to fix it.
Shel_Sri (2026-02-05 12:35:37+00:00): Hi 小智智,

While reviewing this area, I noticed two nearby ways mapped with the highway=steps tag that appeared to represent the same feature. I removed one of them as a likely duplicate.

Thank you for reaching out and fixing the situation. The additional information is greatly appreciated.
小智智 (2026-02-05 12:37:59+00:00): Sorry, they represented two steps, one over the other. 

I have fixed it and added level tags now.
Baloo Uriza (2025-12-15 13:10:48+00:00): You can put the address on the building it applies to.  Your node also appears in the middle of a road.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175942730
speeny (2025-12-16 01:16:49+00:00): the leasing office, the building right next to where i edited, does in fact have the address already. searching by the complex's name does go to the right spot. but searching the address itself, does not work. it puts the marker in the middle of the road, like 3 blocks down. i'm unsure how to attach an image but i can take a screenshot to show what i mean
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175942730
NeisBot (2025-12-15 06:31:28+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Community service center"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-12-16 16:46:45+00:00): ❌ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/175945709
MassCartog (2025-12-15 14:25:35+00:00): Hi welcome to OSM. Thanks for your contribution, just wanted to let you know removing real features that exist on the ground is incorrect. 

You have a new account and might not be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground. If it exists on the ground, it is valid data regardless of a feature being public or private, designated or informal/illegal/unauthorized. Removing features that exist is actually considered vandalism.

The correct way to handle this is to use OSM's tagging system. access=private, or access=no would be appropriate if they are closed to the public. Once this is done, services that do use OSM data will reflect that and specify their access.

Thanks,

Check out this for more info:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property
NeisBot (2025-12-15 06:31:29+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Window fashions store"

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description
NeisRevert (2025-12-15 06:36:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/175945550
where the comment is: "Remove unclear map edits"
NeisRevert (2025-12-15 06:37:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/175945557
where the comment is: "Remove unclear map edits"
FajrAl (2025-12-15 05:50:15+00:00): Hi, please let me handle the boundary here. They are in WIP. Currently it is still in phase 2.
borovac (2025-12-15 05:54:14+00:00): Hi,
Can you then finish everything, since they are still open.
And if you can write to me which borders are connected.
I will not respond to all comments, 1 is enough for us to communicate.
FajrAl (2025-12-15 06:06:18+00:00): Most of the open boundaries are outside Bogor. The Bogor boundary is the one being updated, so any other boundaries can remain connected to Bogor’s end vertices.
borovac (2025-12-15 06:11:35+00:00): Relations cannot remain open, thus creating errors on the map.
If it is not yet finished then you should not create new borders yet.
I left you a list of all the relations that were broken by one of your edits.
Can I ask you to go through them again and fix them because they cannot remain broken.
FajrAl (2025-12-15 06:15:18+00:00): Okay, I’ve just finished phase 2. I’m now proceeding to the final phase: fixing.
borovac (2025-12-15 06:18:09+00:00): Thanks.
Just pay attention to the surrounding relations. Thanks.
They also need to be fixed.
Thanks again.
FajrAl (2025-12-15 05:50:33+00:00): Hi, please let me handle the Bogor's boundary here. They are in WIP. Currently it is still in phase 2.
FajrAl (2025-12-15 05:50:43+00:00): Hi, please let me handle the Bogor's boundary here. They are in WIP. Currently it is still in phase 2.
bxl-forever (2025-12-15 08:08:03+00:00): Hello,

Thanks for reviewing the temporary situation here.

Setting "motor_vehicle=no" is enough.  There is no need to add "foot=yes" and "bicycle=yes" explicitely when no tag forbids those means of transport, those tags just create confusion.
Don’t bother to fix this one, but please bear this in mind to improve your further edits.

Have a nice day.
rajdhani (2025-12-16 08:55:37+00:00): Hi bxl-forever , 

thank you for your valuable feedback and your understanding. While the bicycle=yes tag was already there before my edit, clarification on both redundant tags is much appreciated on my side and I will keep that in mind on my future edits.
s777n (2026-02-21 18:38:59+00:00): Здравствуйте. Почему вы поменяли класс дороги https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1346006484 на service? Насколько я понимаю это достаточно важный зимник а не подъезд.
pitscheplatsch (2025-12-27 13:10:07+00:00): (Partly) reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176298383
Fizzie-DWG (2025-12-19 06:09:40+00:00): DWG revert - fictitious changes

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176124388
Fizzie-DWG (2025-12-19 06:15:36+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19190
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2025-12-16 18:07:03+00:00): Merhaba. Lütfen değişiklik açıklamalarınızda değişikliğinizi kısaca özetleyebilir misiniz? Bkz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Örneğin bu değişikliğiniz için "Van Çevre Yolu'ndan yanlışlıkla silinen highway=trunk etiketi tekrar eklendi." yazılabilirdi.

İyi günler.
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2025-12-16 18:08:11+00:00): Merhaba. Lütfen değişiklik açıklamalarınızda değişikliğinizi kısaca özetleyebilir misiniz? Bkz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Örneğin bu değişikliğiniz için "Van Çevre Yolu'ndan yanlışlıkla silinen highway=trunk etiketi tekrar eklendi." yazılabilirdi.

İyi günler.
arjunaraoc (2025-12-17 04:18:55+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).  I realized that you used non English (Polish?) names for your edits. Please use English for name tags and summaries. Please mention sources for your edits.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175947973
NeisBot (2025-12-15 08:17:06+00:00): Hi 하이찬, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 23 man_made(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=175948405
Taya_S (2025-12-15 08:46:35+00:00): Reverted deletions. Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19168

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175949428
NeisBot (2025-12-15 18:46:40+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Roof replacement and installation services in Glendale"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-12-16 16:53:02+00:00): ❌ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/175968027
dzamper (2025-12-18 22:15:03+00:00): ja wiem? jak na autostradzie jest remont jednej jezdni, i ruch odbywa się dwukierunkowo drugą jezdnią, to nikt jej `motorway` nie odbiera (i słusznie)… tu jest w zasadzie podobnie
Dawid2849 (2025-12-18 22:43:34+00:00): A nie wiem. W wymaganiach motorway na drogach ekspresowych jest wymóg dwóch jezdni, tutaj ruch będzie się odbywał na jednej (raczej przez dłuższy czas, bo druga jezdnia w zasadzie jeszcze nie istnieje)
Dawid2849 (2025-12-18 23:08:22+00:00): Obwodnica Łomży również była oznaczona jako trunk do czasu otwarcia drugiej nitki
TheNightRider (2025-12-15 09:11:52+00:00): The comments about "No street sign for this road" apply to the little east-west section between Highlands Ridge Heights and Chapel Hills Drive. Sorry for the confusion.
Kovoschiz (2025-12-15 10:02:42+00:00): Please don't directly delete them . They are already `disused:*=` correctly. They contain addresses, and still represent store spaces. This makes tracking and updating them more difficult, wasting previous effort, and increasing next workload.
eggie (2025-12-15 09:13:39+00:00): Dag Tomas. Je vraagt feedback. Lijkt me oke.
Ik heb accesstags G11 toegevoegd conform het verdere verloop.

MVG
eggie
Luzandro (2025-12-15 11:35:37+00:00): Hallo,

private Swimmingpools bitte auch entsprechend mit access=private markieren

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure=swimming%20pool?uselang=de

"lokales Wissen der örtlichen Feuerwehr , Luftbildaufnahmen" ist im übrigen als Quelle interessant, aber kein gute Changeset-Kommentar, WAS geändert wurde

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175949960
Feuerwehr Himberg (2025-12-15 18:09:24+00:00): Danke erledigt. mfg Feuerwehr Himebrg
eggie (2025-12-15 09:20:05+00:00): Dag Esther,

Je hebt hier de straatnaam verwijderd?
en veranderd in addr:street:name?  Waarom?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:street:name

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-12-15 09:21:58+00:00): Adres hersteld. 

Gr eggie
Esther BF (2025-12-15 09:33:15+00:00): Hoi Eggie,

Bedankt voor het checken!

Ik probeer het bedrijf vindbaar te krijgen in Flitsmeister, maar dit lukte een tijdje niet. Ik dacht dat het misschien aan het adres en de brand name lag. Daarom brand (en website) toegevoegd en street aangepast.
eggie (2025-12-15 09:38:45+00:00): Het zou gewoon moeten werken
eggie (2025-12-15 10:19:43+00:00): Zoekslag: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=Max+Badkamers&zoom=19&minlon=5.812674164772035&minlat=52.388002692963084&maxlon=5.815855264663697&maxlat=52.3890683552516#map=19/52.388535/5.814264
Esther BF (2025-12-15 12:03:40+00:00): Klopt, dat zou ik ook zeggen. Alleen als je "MAX Badkamers" in Flitsmeister zoekt, dan vind je ze vooralsnog niet. Terwijl ik het account al halverwege september in OSM heb gewijzigd. Helaas is de klantenservice van Flitsmeister niet zo goed, dus die reageren nergens op...
eggie (2025-12-15 12:10:54+00:00): Vreemd.. en vind je dan die Stella in het zelfde pand wel?
Ik heb geen idee wanneer Flitsmeister z'n updates doorvoert.
Esther BF (2025-12-15 12:22:54+00:00): Ja, hij pakt Stella op dat adres, terwijl dat in OSM is aangepast naar 90a. Volgens de site past FM het eens per maand aan, maar deze wijziging is nog niet doorgekomen
NeisBot (2025-12-15 18:43:15+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 13 potential crossings.

Problematic elements (top 3 by category):
https://osm.org/way/37288912 v4 | 7 crossings
https://osm.org/way/36879781 v10 | 6 crossings

Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/428803322 v3

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=175950429
FrankiiB (2025-12-15 21:24:12+00:00): Hi Neis
Thank you for your comments. I'm having difficulty finding your elements - my changesets are for the box in the West Midlands, but when I click on the 3 links in your comment they show me somewhere near Aylesbury. I have no edits there. Perhaps you meant somewhere in the West Midlands box which is not coming up from the link? Please let me know then I can look at it. Thank you
pitscheplatsch (2025-12-16 16:45:01+00:00): Hi FrankiiB,

Thank you for your reply.

Please take a look at the following node:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/428803322

As you can see, you are the most recent contributor, and version 3 is part of this changeset.

Additionally, the referenced ways clearly indicate the crossing. Did you have a chance to review this?

I hope this helps.

Best regards,
Pascal
habi (2025-12-15 09:17:38+00:00): Und etwas kleinere Anpassungen in der Nachbarschaft.
eggie (2025-12-15 09:26:12+00:00): Dag Tomas,

Dit is eigenlijk geen parkeerterrein, maar het zijn parkeervakken.
Tagging gaat als volgt.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:parking%3Dstreet_side

Ik heb wat aangepast.

MVG
eggie
ilias_ (2025-12-15 14:57:31+00:00): You forgot to fix the bus line relations. For example this way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1445965779 is missing from this relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5762251.
Princess_Aurora (2025-12-16 07:43:37+00:00): Thanks, I fixed that
joost schouppe (2026-01-06 09:45:50+00:00): Hi Thomas,
When you add small places of worship, like eg https://osm.org/way/43366256, please make sure there are some tags that make it clear it is something small. E.g. building=chapel, historic=wayside_cross, etc.
For some more context: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/joost%20schouppe/diary/407621
NorthCrab_upload (2025-12-15 09:41:13+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.

"Dębowiec":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13369790518
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/419768750
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1458691393

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
CanopyFalls (2026-01-10 11:45:32+00:00): Thank you for contributing to OSM! Just a small note, if you change a store to vacant you should delete the name and opening hours as well. Best of luck with any future mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175950824
woodpeck (2025-12-15 10:22:56+00:00): Dear BrianKarani, in this changeset you have deleted a lot of buildings and then re-drawn them. The JOSM editor that you are using has an edit mode that allows you to correct the geometry of existing objects, rather than deleting them. That way, the history (Object initially created by user X, then improved by user Y) remains intact. Please consider using that in the future.

Also, please write changeset comments that are understandable by the average OSM community member - nobody outside a small circle of people knows what "#hotosm-project-37527" is supposed to mean ;)
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-15 09:52:35+00:00): https://revert.osmz.ru/11905
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-15 09:52:39+00:00):  Reverting changesets: 175914871 175914648 175914437 175913390
dzidek23 (2025-12-17 16:32:46+00:00): Hej Mateusz, 
Z mojej perspektywy szkoda że to zostało wycofane. Na Piekarach w Legnicy znikneły wysokości budunków, które przy widoku 3D byłyby całkiem użyteczne.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-17 16:43:19+00:00): problem w tym że to były edycje osoby która się publicznie chwaliła tym że wandalizuje OSM + kopiowała dane z Google Maps
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-17 16:43:51+00:00): więc te edycje były bardzo podejrzane, choć możliwe że część (lub akurat te) miały dane poprawne
dzidek23 (2025-12-18 10:29:30+00:00): a możnaby tak revert revertu? ;)
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-18 18:26:51+00:00): Nie, ponieważ ta osoba chwaliła się dodawaniem edycji z Google Maps + dodawaniem celowo danych.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-18 18:27:04+00:00): Nie, ponieważ ta osoba chwaliła się dodawaniem edycji z Google Maps + dodawaniem celowo błędnych danych.
kapazao (2026-02-03 07:46:30+00:00): Hola, ¿cuál es el motivo por el que etiquetas como edificios cosas que no lo son?

Por favor revisa bien el etiquetado utilizado para evitar problemas.

Un saludo
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-15 09:56:20+00:00):  Reverting changesets: 175899791 175899758 175899739 175899688 175899572 175899638
eggie (2025-12-15 10:14:22+00:00): Dag Wilms,

Geef svp concreet aan wat je hebt gedaan. Plaatselijk bekend zegt niemand wat.
oneway=no hoef je niet op reguliere wegen te zetten. dat is default.
Verder heb je een pad verschoven dwars over de bebouwing.
Vermoedelijk door schuiven met de kaart in editmodus. 
Heb je nu gecontroleerd wat je hebt gedaan?

Ik draai je wijziging even terug. Wat was je bedoeling?
Je edits 
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=175951953
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-12-15 10:17:22+00:00): reverted by changeset #175952571
De kaart is weer hersteld. De Duindreef liep tot in de AH. :)

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-12-15 10:42:46+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback Alle begin is moeilijk. Svp geen adresgegevens aan de gebouwomtrek toevoegen. Er is al een adresnode waar op bijgetagd kan worden. 
De speeltuin staat nu 2x getagd op de kaart? 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-12-15 10:45:35+00:00): Het adres en de info heb ik weer verwiderd van het gebouw. Het terrein aangepast.

MVG
eggie
Sonneveld (2025-12-15 10:52:11+00:00): Ah, sorry eerste keer hier. Heb vluchtig de tutorial gedaan en wat aanpassingen gedaan. Dank je wel voor de feedback/aanpassingen

Groet
eggie (2025-12-15 11:33:40+00:00): No problem.. veel plezier met mappen.
Gr eggie
Gregory Peony (2025-12-16 03:13:35+00:00): This looks to me like maybe walls, perhaps of a building which previously had a roof. What's the alternate source you're referencing in this changeset?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175952802
eggie (2025-12-15 10:48:52+00:00): Het parkeerterreintje Bogerd heb ik samengevoegd.
Parkeervakken langs de weg taggen met parking=street_side.
Dat geeft minder prominente P's. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:parking%3Dstreet_side

Mapse,
eggie
Canard164 (2025-12-16 20:43:54+00:00): Bonjour,

Merci d’avoir mis à jour cet établissement !
J’ai cependant l’impression que le lien vers Instagram pointe toujours vers l’ancien bar.
Si le nouvel établissement a un compte Instagram, il est possible de remplacer le lien. Sinon, l’attribut « contact:instagram » peut être supprimé.
Minibig (2025-12-19 10:23:11+00:00): Bonjour,
Je vous remercie pour votre commentaire ! J'ai mis à jour la page Instagram du restaurant.
Merci encore pour votre contribution
IreuN (2025-12-15 14:09:51+00:00): Jesteście pewni, że już otwarte? GDDKIA podaje teraz termin na jutro: https://drogi.gddkia.gov.pl/mapy/mapa-informacji-drogowej?situation=Uzg2JDIzLjAwMA%3D%3D
IreuN (2025-12-15 14:10:59+00:00): Tylko nie zrozum mnie źle - nie było mnie na miejscu, nie wiem czy już otworzyli wiadukt, wiem jedynie że dalej się tam korkuje S86 więc zakładam że zwężenia przynajmniej na ekspresówce zostały
IreuN (2025-12-15 14:12:30+00:00): https://dziennikzachodni.pl/na-te-wiadomosc-czekalo-tysiace-kierowcow-ze-slaska-koniec-utrudnien-na-granicy-katowic-i-sosnowca-dzis-koniec-robot-przy-s86/ar/c1p2-28267909

Dobra, chyba wszystko jasne, dziś otwarta góra, jutro otwarty dół
Tomek | Yanosik (2025-12-15 14:24:03+00:00): 👍
Branko Kokanovic (2025-12-16 08:15:15+00:00): Dogovor je da ne nazivamo puteve svojevoljno, nego da pratimo RGZ. Mesto Zaugline postoji, nalazi se severno do Drine. Ovo što si ti uneo nije blizu tog mesta, nema ga u RGZ-u i nema ref:RS:ulica. Odakle ti informacije za ove ulice što unosiš? Jel ima neka tabla da se ulica ovde zove tako? Moramo da se dogovorimo, nije normalno da ja idem i brišem imena puteva, a ti ih onda dodaješ:)

https://dina.openstreetmap.rs/st/opstine/bajinabasta/ZAUGLINE.html
eggie (2025-12-15 11:37:01+00:00): Dag Wytze,

Wanneer dat pad allen maar afgesloten is kun je het beter niet verwijderen, maar access=no toevoegen.
.. anders tekent een medemapper het wellicht weer in.
Mvg..
eggie
user_5359 (2025-12-19 08:40:56+00:00): Hello! Please use building=yes instead of Building=Yes!
Phil Amny (2026-07-08 08:00:14+00:00): Bonjour, la voie en question est ouverte depuis hier.
pyrog (2025-12-18 18:43:38+00:00): Bonsoir,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13377941389
Cet objet n'est pas vraiment un poteau directionnel.
C'est plutôt un panneau d'information.

Le tag name est "descriptif".
D'après cette photo ça serait plutôt "Eglise Saint-Laurent".
https://explore.panoramax.fr/?focus=pic&map=23/45.193366/5.7199646&pic=ae5a4541-af4d-4aae-9faa-71484f5c369a&speed=250&theme=default&xyz=135.29/9.17/79

Je n'ai pas le temps ce soir de regarder tous tes changesets, mais ici je vois encore un objet avec un nom descriptif : 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13377941387

Cordialement,
Yves - Groupe OSM Plein Air
NeisBot (2025-12-15 11:03:36+00:00): Hi MercyObwoge, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 95% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 1 boundary(s)
- 1 highway(s)
- 2 name(s)
- 1 surface(s)
- 1 waterway(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=175953896