piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
moonraver (2024-06-01 11:32:25+00:00): Ahoj, SCK prelozilo oficialne cyklotrasu Vazskej cyklomagistraly, ked si ju dal cez most a cez mesto? alebo si sa drzal zakona, ze cyklista je povinny pouzit cesticku pre cyklistov? alebo aky bol dovod jej prelozenia,lebo je to teraz riadna obchadzka.Predtym pokracovala pekne rovno cez cyklokoridor smerom na hradzu za stavidlami a smer stary zeleznicny most a Zamarovce.
Dik za odpoved.
mapperue (2024-06-01 12:36:28+00:00): Ahoj,
táto relácia má členov nemenených od roku 2020.
A touto zmenou, ktorú komentuješ som nemenil členov, ale len tagy.
Marek-M (2024-01-31 08:33:05+00:00): Dzień dobry, czy jest dostępne jakieś źródło tej nazwy?
Marek-M (2024-01-31 08:02:55+00:00): Dzień dobry, czy jest dostępne jakieś źródło tej nazwy?
zstadler (2024-01-31 10:03:36+00:00): שלום מוישה10

תודה על תרומתך למיפוי!

 נראה שבטעות מיפית פעמיים את אותו 
איזור פיקניק

https://israelhiking.osm.org.il/map/18.91/31.3612/34.7175
zstadler (2024-02-15 07:34:16+00:00): Fixed
PubUpdater (2024-01-31 09:25:40+00:00): Hi, in this changeset the names of two pubs were removed. Why was this done? Are the pubs closed or something else?
eoin-c (2024-01-31 09:36:28+00:00): Both pubs have been merged into a single one, renamed Pye
PubUpdater (2024-01-31 13:32:37+00:00): OK, thanks
pi11 (2024-01-31 02:15:38+00:00): Hey, bedankt voor je bijdrage. Je bent enkel vergeten om de shop=* waarde aan te passen, deze winkel staat nu nog geregistreerd als interieurwinkel. Zou je dit nog willen aanpassen? shop=music 
 (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dmusic) lijkt een passende waarde.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146875082
pitscheplatsch (2024-02-01 07:21:31+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

Just a test?
citrula (2024-01-30 19:32:50+00:00): building=* areas should match the footprint of the building. Also, please press "Q" to square corners of areas as needed.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146875961
user_14547832 (2024-02-02 15:02:22+00:00): Why do they have to Improperly Generate Structures?
Glassman (2024-02-02 19:43:18+00:00): The residential road added near Tilton River State Park looks more like a service road. Should be tagged as highway=service.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146875999
Baloo Uriza (2024-11-21 19:53:47+00:00): I assume you meant "Cushing" and not "Cusing" for the city.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146876031
Aleksandar Matejevic (2024-02-26 11:44:26+00:00): Can you fix the geometries, level, and other attributes in this changeset, looks broken now
MxxCon (2024-02-06 07:26:53+00:00): You can spot traffic signals from satellite imagery by distinctive diagonal poles/gantry extending from corners of the intersection towards the middle of it. On 12th ave and 66th st you can see them extending from W and E corners of the intersection.
On 12th ave and 45th st they are and their shadows are more clearly visible.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146876267
MxxCon (2024-02-06 08:04:40+00:00): Also if you don't see "STOP" written on the road at cars' stop position, it's most likely traffic lights.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146876267
silversurfer83 (2024-07-10 07:42:09+00:00): Hi :)

you closed this road about 5 month ago and I saw, that you (accidentally?) added "barrier=fence" to the whole road. I guess this was not intended.
Do you remember where the fence is located? If yes, please add a single node there and make that node a fence. In the meantime I will remove the "fence" from the whole highway. Thank you

silversurfer83
Henrygun (2024-07-19 16:06:31+00:00): and the street completely trashed?
Good job!
silversurfer83 (2024-07-19 16:15:38+00:00): You might wish to check the history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/380938541/history

Thanks for pointing out that you trashed the road, something I overlooked. My bad. It was only rendered because you made a fence of the highway.

Anyways: Do you know where the fences are located?
Henrygun (2024-07-19 17:42:50+00:00): exactly where the intersections of the red road are.
the fence is solid on both sides, about 2m high, built with heavy concrete buckets. Doesn't look temporary.
pyrog (2024-03-05 11:45:09+00:00): Bonjour,
Tu as cassé l'itinéraire Parking Télécabine - Pont de la Bronsonnière.

Je corrige.

Cordialement,
Yves

cf. https://knooppuntnet.nl/en/analysis/changeset/146876511/5942046
NeisBot (2024-02-01 07:22:40+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146933721
Amir969288 (2024-01-30 19:45:30+00:00): عالی ازهمه نظر
mavOsaure (2024-01-31 13:03:45+00:00): Le feu et le radar (de feu) ont été démontés entre 2020 et 2022. Visible sur StreetView. Je fais le ménage.
santamariense (2024-02-06 20:47:31+00:00): Olá GabrielaMal123,

Vi que inutilizou a Travessa Amandus Müller com o argumento "Vias desativadas para acesso de caminhão".
Poderia explicar o que se passa no local para a gente chegar a uma melhor solução?

Obrigado,
santamariense
Glassman (2024-02-02 19:45:07+00:00): Again, it looks like a service road. OSM started in England so we use Englands road classifications and British English for our tags. unclassified is basically just a rural residential road.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146877365
Glassman (2024-02-02 19:45:54+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146877459
seattlefyi (2024-01-31 01:05:23+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Nice job! Looks great.
wemissyou (2024-01-30 19:59:37+00:00): Can someone fix bus routes pls
Layft Greater (2024-01-31 09:54:09+00:00): Nice
Layft Greater (2024-01-31 10:20:06+00:00): Fixed
Layft Greater (2024-01-31 10:35:16+00:00): junction=roundabout already implies oneway=yes - no need to add the tag
add direction=clockwise instead

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Droundabout
map per (2024-01-31 00:40:51+00:00): Hello auweg,

as you asked for a review of this changest: 
You can use man_made=monitoring_station + monitoring:groundwater=yes for this place (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dmonitoring_station).

Best regards
map per

PS: In the ID Editor you need to expand the "Properties" section to add these tags.
map per (2024-03-20 20:28:26+00:00): I added the man_made=monitoring_station and monitoring:groundwater=yes tags
Tomas_J (2024-07-28 08:37:38+00:00): Zdravim, datove centru neni kategorie Turisticka atrakce, ale spis tohle:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:telecom%3Ddata_center
Opravil jsem
erickdeoliveiraleal (2024-02-04 14:25:32+00:00): reverted
mavOsaure (2024-01-31 17:43:04+00:00): édité : radar de feu rouge
mavOsaure (2024-01-31 17:42:39+00:00): édité : radar de feu rouge
Popolon (2024-02-02 17:56:08+00:00): Il en reste encore un sans limite de vitesse, peut être s'agît il encore d'un radar de feu?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/794213467

Ne pas tout casser en mettant note unqiuement, ce qui n'a aucun sens. Suivre cette page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Relation:enforcement
Dodko (2024-01-31 09:02:12+00:00): Neostal na budove nápis pošta?
Ak nieje žiaden nápis mohla sa zmazať, ak tam niečo ostalo malo sa nechať, aby ju náhodou niekto nepridal ak pôjde okolo autom.

disused:amenity=post_office znamenalo že je zrušená

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:P%C5%99edpona_%C5%BEivotn%C3%ADho_cyklu
Mayllo9 (2024-03-18 18:47:00+00:00): Nie napis tam nie je
totera (2024-01-31 00:05:12+00:00): Hi paul, maybe there is no consensus because JOSM Validator marks "Dec 24,31" as error and suggests "Dec 24,Dec 31" as fix.
seattlefyi (2024-01-31 00:49:11+00:00): Hi, thanks for the edits! Have to ask though -- is the building and address for the closed business still there? It's possible to remove just the business tags (name, type, phone, website, etc) and leave the still-valid feature for the next tenant. (I've already put it back, but lmk if indeed the building's gone!) Thanks again, hope to see more.
Abdul004 (2024-01-31 01:40:56+00:00): Yes. Building still exists. There is going to another business starting here but that will take a few more weeks.

I wanted to mark this as un-occupied or something similar , but wasnt able to . So now I know the way to do that is just remove business information
seattlefyi (2024-01-31 06:32:13+00:00): Yes, just removing old tags is usually the best method - but there is a way to add info to tagging keys to indicate status if really necessary. It’s described here, would suggest using sparingly: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
seattlefyi (2024-01-31 01:37:04+00:00): Hi again, this is a useful edit, I just followed up to change it from a amenity=kindergarten tag to a more accurate leisure=playground with access=private as documented here (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dkindergarten). Keep at it, it may take a few edits to learn the ropes, but mapping is fun! Thanks again.
michel60 (2024-06-23 16:07:10+00:00): Bonjour,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7783811892

Ce ne sont que des radar de Test

Cordialement Michel
eggie (2024-01-30 21:33:12+00:00): Dag Veron  De tag amenity=cafe heb ik verwijderd.
MVG
eggie
mcliquid (2024-01-31 08:13:05+00:00): Hi,

please note: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
-Hubert- (2024-01-30 21:26:52+00:00): i latarnia
Rhoon (2024-02-06 07:04:26+00:00): Hallo Jortus,
du "benennst" in letzter Zeit viele Orte. Dabei handelt sich aber eher um eine Beschreibung. Bitte beachte die Regeln zum Tag 'Name'. Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:name
Danke.
Guixovitch (2024-02-16 14:25:21+00:00): Bonjour,
Il semble que votre modification a supprimé au moins 2 zones de maison de retraite de manière non justifiée (peut être même 27 si j'en crois la log)
Pouvez-vous me dire pourquoi vous avez fait cela ?
Car je pense qu'un retour arrière doit être fait sur tout ou une partie de votre modification.
Cordialement.
Guixovitch (2024-02-23 14:01:31+00:00): En l'absence de réponse de votre part, j'ai fait un retour arrière sur vos modifications. Merci de vérifier les informations la prochaines fois que vous éditer à l'aide d'un outil tiers.
eggie (2024-01-30 21:37:23+00:00): rest tagging (website)   verwijderd
sugarbotond (2024-12-09 17:08:15+00:00): A valóságban semmi nem utal ezekre az utcanevekre.
vasony (2024-12-09 19:35:16+00:00): Most írtam a kerületi önkormányzatnak, még sose válaszolt a II. kerület, hátha epapíron több szerencsém lesz.

16. § (3) Az utcanévtábla kihelyezéséről, karbantartásáról és pótlásáról – összhangban a Magyarország helyi önkormányzatairól szóló 2011. évi CLXXXIX. törvény (továbbiakban: Mötv.) 23. § (3) bekezdésében foglaltakkal – a kerületi önkormányzat gondoskodik.
mrpulley (2024-02-11 11:04:19+00:00): Just checking on the source for the maxspeed change - is this from the NSW Speed Data source or from local survey? Google imagery from Dec 2023 still shows maxspeed 20 (which I had surveyed previously)
mrpulley (2025-02-08 06:09:16+00:00): I've reverted this maxspeed change at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162268705 - my survey in 2015 was maxspeed=20, Google imagery Nov 2024 still shows maxspeed=20. NSW Speed Data doesn't show any data for this road (not surprising as it's a driveway).
mrpulley (2026-02-28 08:29:47+00:00): Resurveyed Nov 2025 - definitely still maxspeed 20 for this driveway
SpinOff (2024-01-30 22:25:52+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146881407
syntex (2024-05-30 14:47:24+00:00): Te przejścia nie są jeszcze otwarte
emersonveenstra (2024-02-01 12:50:29+00:00): Hi there,

Please don't add crossing tags to a stop node, it is confusing for data consumers. The stop node needs to be where the stop line is for cars, and the crossing node needs to be where pedestrians cross. Could you fix this please? Thanks!
emersonveenstra (2024-02-09 14:20:23+00:00): Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147259027
geocruizer (2024-02-09 14:42:27+00:00): Hello - thank you for flagging this for me. In the available imagery I can't see the stop line, and the crossing appears to be in the correct location so I'm not exactly sure what should be fixed. I would normally use street-level imagery to verify these details but Bing is not working, and the Mapillary images are low quality.
emersonveenstra (2024-02-12 13:25:10+00:00): It's fine if you don't know exactly where the stop line is, even if you're a few feet off it's more accurate than saying there's a stop sign on the crosswalk itself
geocruizer (2024-02-12 14:27:09+00:00): Hello emersonveenstra - thank you for reviewing my edits and commenting. I looked into this further and the original stop sign point was added by another mapper. I move the roadway slightly, which moved the stop sign and associated my name with the last edit. Thank you
VictorIE (2024-01-31 07:36:22+00:00): Hi,

Is this a 'middle of the air' connection?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11565600281#map=16/52.0940/-8.2479
PluMGMK (2024-01-31 21:04:24+00:00): Hello! I haven't seen it up close, but from what I can make out from the aerial imagery, I think it must be. The pylon just looks like a normal end mast, and the nearby double-poles are normal suspension ones, so there don't seem to be any dedicated branching masts. From what I've seen elsewhere that seems to be the way these 110-kV branches are usually done…
ljb_nj (2024-02-09 22:59:58+00:00): There is some pretty poor mapping here. Your sources are out of date. I removed the name from a section of the CCC (Orange) trail with a note that this was no longer part of the trail and not visible. You put the name back.  Why are you making changes to good mapping based on poor sources?  You cite 'survey' as one of your sources. Did you really go on-site and survey this?
BPTT (2024-02-09 23:36:12+00:00): "Survey" as a source can be a noun, rather than a verb, and I provided my sources, which are not illegitimate. When I've verified something in person, I use "local knowledge." I really don't appreciate how you seem to be monitoring and moderating my changesets, and your continued skepticism about my edits. Simply missing a note field does not constitute "pretty poor mapping," and a misnamed path is a very small deal. I'm using the official trail maps and guides created by the NJDEP, and I always make a concerted effort to find and use the most current versions of the PDFs available online. I would appreciate if you would not police my work; the pines are neither yours nor mine alone. I've been collecting the changesets where you call me out, and I'd rather not have to escalate this. If you can provide a source to prove that my sources are outdated, I'd be glad to see it.
ljb_nj (2024-07-23 01:05:02+00:00): Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source for an explanation of the proper use of 'sources' in a Changeset.  'Survey' means you were 'there and saw it firsthand'. 'Local knowledge' means you have 'some affiliation with the area (resident, place of work, frequent visits) and knows this first hand or from others in the area.'

If I go there and map based on what I see, that's 'survey'.  If I map based on talking to the park superintendent, or local folks, that's 'local knowledge'.
Glassman (2024-02-02 19:36:19+00:00): Why did you add the tag layer=-1? Is the building underground?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146882029
DeFra85 (2024-03-30 12:07:43+00:00): Das generelle access=no im Bereich AdventureGolf würde ich lassen, da dort niemand außer "Golfer, die zahlen" was zu suchen haben
Glassman (2024-01-31 20:01:55+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146882623
Spixi (2024-02-05 10:49:33+00:00): Hi @FahrradstadtAachen, kannst du bitte die Hausnummer im westlichen Teil auch ändern? Laut GEOportalNRW ist das dort nicht die 3, sondern die 1a. Außerdem fehlt noch die Hausnummer 3a, die sich im gleichen Gebäude wie die 3 befindet. Vielen Dank!
Spixi (2024-02-05 10:51:03+00:00): Du musst ggf. auf 1:1128 ranzoomen, da beim Maßstab 1:2257 noch alte Daten im Geoportal angezeigt werden.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-30 23:51:07+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Ludwika Skrzypka":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11571475757
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11571505634
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11571505635
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11571505636
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11571505637
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11571505638

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
aceman444 (2024-02-11 12:27:21+00:00): Neklikajte nahodne funkcie v editore iD ked neviete co robia, a ci tieto automaticke zmeny su spravne. Minimalne zmeny nastupist elektriciek na Hlavnej stanici su tu urobene nespravne.

To popridavanie tram=yes a bus=yes na zastavky nie je velmi potrebne (smerodajne je ci su v spravnych relaciach autobusovych ci elektrickovych linkach), ale ok, nie je to na zavadu. Teda je, kedze ste pridali len bus=yes aj na zastavkach kde stoji aj trolejbus. A napr. na zastavke https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2008419954 kde stoji len trolejbus, ste pridali bus=yes, cize uplne (nie len ciastocne) nespravne.

Ak tieto zastavky ale editor iD zobrazoval bez tychto znaciek ako 'nastupiste pre vlak', tak to je klamanie pouzivatela a preto Vam hovorim, aby ste na neho davali pozor.

Taktiez pridavanie network, network:wikidata a operator:wikidata na kazdy zastavku je dost zbytocne, ked je to centralne v relacii MHD Bratislava.

Takze trochu opatrnejsie s Vasimi zmenami a nie hned hrr na cele Slovensko.
1Mmarek (2024-02-11 15:44:06+00:00): sorry :(

čo bolo zle na električkových nástupištiach na stanici?
aceman444 (2024-04-01 22:30:25+00:00): https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=147325847

Cesty ako https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/388148758 nepotrebovali public_transport=platform, kedze nastupistiach uz su reprezentovane bodmi ako https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3188970337 , ktory ma tuto znacku. Islo teda o zbytocnu duplicitu objektu.
seattlefyi (2024-01-31 00:56:47+00:00): Hi again, this is a useful edit, I just followed up to change it from a amenity=kindergarten tag to a more accurate leisure=playground with access=private as documented here (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dkindergarten). Keep at it, it may take a few edits to learn the ropes, but mapping is fun! Thanks again.
CurlingMan13 (2024-11-26 00:32:23+00:00): instead of adding a new and separate node for features, like Spectrum, you should just update the store that it replaced.

I highly recommend an app called StreetComplete which allows you to make the necessary name/brand change right from the app.
OddlyAngled (2024-01-31 03:37:38+00:00): thanks for helping with tagging. the osm.wikidata.link app doesn’t support waterway relations and often adds duplicate or redundant tags. any chance you could take a pass through these changes and see if the relation is tagged appropriately (if there is one)? I have been trying to keep tags on the relations
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146884431
4b3eff (2024-01-31 05:35:06+00:00): I aimed to avoid rivers that have relations by only tagging the smallest/simplest ones, but will double check that.
Thanks!
OddlyAngled (2024-01-31 06:59:24+00:00): Yosemite isn’t too bad since most of the creeks have been drawn by hand, but they are often split with culverts… compare that to most of the rest of the Sierra where it is terrible NHD flow lines, and there are lots of two node ways near the wikidata coordinates.

appreciate the help though!
Glassman (2024-02-02 20:12:49+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146884530
Glassman (2024-02-02 20:31:03+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

I removed your roundabout and added one back in. Roundabouts are not easy to added, especially since their is a route relation for US 410 on East Wine Country Road. Once imagery is updated, then it can be aligned correctly.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146884534
koksu (2024-02-27 10:19:48+00:00): Hej,
Sam tę nazwę wymyśliłeś?
czebureks (2024-02-27 15:19:25+00:00): Cześć!
Nie. Jest bardzo dobrze udokumentowana:
Np.: 
1) https://gdansk.gedanopedia.pl/gdansk/?title=OBOZY_W_NARWIKU
2) https://www.rp.pl/historia/art11905911-narwik-miejsce-hanby-niemcow-i-polakow
koksu (2024-02-27 22:28:41+00:00): Jestem nikim, ale moim zdaniem nie powinno się dodawać nieistniejących miejsc na mapie. Rozumiem, że 100 lat temu był tam obóz Narwik, ale dziś już go tam nie ma.
czebureks (2024-02-28 20:12:49+00:00): Twoja opinia jest tak samo istotna jak moja w tej sprawie, więc proponuję wyjaśnić tę kwestię na gruncie obiektywnych standardów. :)

Nazwa "Narwik" w odniesieniu do tego obszaru, również po likwidacji ostatnich zabudowań poobozowych w 2012 roku, jest używana i rozpoznawalna przez mieszkańców Gdańska - faktem jest, że raczej głównie przez starsze pokolenie.

Dodatkowym argumentem jest sama ulica Narwicka, której nazwa nawiązuje właśnie raczej do gdańskiego Narwiku niż do miasta w Norwegii.
blackboxlogic (2024-01-31 15:57:24+00:00): On satellite imagery, the observatory is on the next field to the east, over a tree line. Has the observatory been moved and the imagery is old?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146884598
user_20607473 (2024-01-31 17:01:38+00:00): Yes, the Observatory was moved over the summer of 2023. As satellite imagery is updated, the Observatory can be readjusted if needed but for now it is as close as possible on OSM to its current location.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146884598
lyjjimmy (2024-04-08 09:15:29+00:00): Hi there, thanks for contributing to OSM project. Regarding the busway you added for Restwell St, it might not be straightforward in iD editor, but the original Restwell St already includes the contraflow bus lane information, so making your addition of the busway a redundant data, and to guideline, an roadway without median separation should be mapped as one way, not two. Also the way direction of the main Restwell St is upside down. Would you mind I correct this issue on your behalf?
Cheers,
Jimmy
Lockstar (2024-04-08 09:36:07+00:00): My apologies - was not aware of this.  Thanks for the info.  Happy for you to correct.  Might need to check bus route details to make sure they are changed over.  Thanks.
lyjjimmy (2024-04-08 11:40:24+00:00): That's totally understandable. iD doesn't visualise lane tags so it is pretty easy to forget about it. I have made necessary changes to Restwell St and all bus routes currently associated with it have been updated. Have a good one.