piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
felipeeugenio (2023-02-24 17:47:58+00:00): Hola. Gracias por sus ediciones y bienvenido a la comunidad OSM de Chile.
Por favor verificar si las fuentes que usa están autorizadas por la licencia de OSM. Importar datos protegidos es muy riesgoso y pueden contener errores.

En este caso vemos que cambió el nombre de un río. Estaba mal el nombre anterior o cambio el nombre?
saludos
Kenichi (2023-02-24 17:51:37+00:00): Hola, el río estaba mal nombrado, de hecho el nombre anterior no era preciso decía "Río San Nicolás o Gemnes". En el comentario que puse al changelog se puede ver la fuente oficial de gobierno que muestra el nombre real de esos ríos. Saludos.
felipeeugenio (2023-02-24 17:55:19+00:00): Hola, gracias por su tiempo. Por favor revisar las politicas de copyrigght de OSM. que la fuente sea gubernamental no significa que se puede usar.
De hecho, las del INE están muy contaminadas con easter eggs de fuentes privadas.
Está invitado al chat de la comunidad en Telegram (https://t.me/OSMcl) si quiere compartir con mas maperos.
saludos
Kenichi (2023-02-24 18:01:05+00:00): No sé si entiendo bien. En terreno el río se llama Yumbel, está señalizado así en el lugar. No es que esté usando la fuente de bienes nacionales sin conocimiento del terreno. Saqué mi propio levantamiento ¿Qué fuentes son válidas para justificar que el río está mal nombrado? Saludos.
felipeeugenio (2023-02-24 18:04:43+00:00): Hola.
Si conoce el nombre del río por conocimiento del lugar entonces eso basta.
No agregue fuentes adicionales.
Del resto le explicamos en el chat.
Saludos
adrianojbr (2023-02-24 23:13:53+00:00): Olá, Bruna!

A princípio, tudo certo!

Abraço!
adrianojbr (2023-02-24 23:16:10+00:00): Olá, Bruna!

Também não encontrei problemas que mereçam comentários.

Abraço!
adrianojbr (2023-04-13 16:38:32+00:00): Complementando, deve-se evitar sobrepor elementos, em especial um edifício sobre o outro, mesmo que parcialmente como nesses casos: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1148992837 e https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1105085354.

Além disso, via de regra os edifícios são retangulares. Há uma ferramenta no editor iD para ajustar, que pode ser usada de duas formas: 1. Selecionar o edifício e teclar Q; ou 2, selecionar o edifício, botão direito e clicar em ortogonalizar.

Abraço!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132946240
A Hall (2023-07-12 15:34:16+00:00): You recently mapped these Balsams Wilderness Trails. Do you have any insight on how the xc trails around Mud Pond are for summer access? I've found very little public data and I was thinking about venturing out that way.
nivlac_sebboh (2026-05-13 15:15:46+00:00): I'm assuming they'd be wet and get little traffic.  Here's the map I referenced when digitizing: https://res.cloudinary.com/liftopia/image/upload/c_fit,d_defaults:default_logo_1.png,f_auto,h_800,q_auto,w_800/v1/production/trail_maps/62b327d2bd37d93f673afda8b5773f61.jpg
AndresDuhour (2023-07-01 19:13:24+00:00): Buenas tardes, no conozco la zona, pero la información que encuentro en las imágenes y la municipalidad indicaría que las calles avenida de los fundadores, de los lagos, etc son de acceso público. Si tienen información se los agradecería. Saludos, Andrés
LabelMaker (2023-07-05 19:05:51+00:00): Hello AndreDuhour. The private access was added back in 2013 here. There is no Mapillary street view to verify or visible gates in aerial imagery so I cannot verify. Best.

Traducción automática: 
Hola AndreDuhour. El acceso privado se agregó en 2013 aquí. No hay vista de la calle Mapillary para verificar o puertas visibles en imágenes aéreas, por lo que no puedo verificar. Mejor.
AndresDuhour (2023-07-05 21:07:24+00:00): Hello LabelMaker, thank you for your reply. I asked a person who works in this area and he confirmed that these roads have public access. Private access is restricted to streets within the neighborhoods connected by these main roads.
LabelMaker (2023-07-06 20:25:43+00:00): Thank you for your efforts in finding that out and for fixing those roads!
Warin61 (2023-02-26 04:24:58+00:00): Hi,
Welcome to OSM!
Some hints? 
Buildings are usually 'square' meaning their corners are right angles. When you make a 'square' building pressing the 'Q' key should 'square' up the building making it look better. 
Bing imagery if fairly good.. but DCS imagery tends to have better accuracy and resolution.
NorthCrab (2023-02-24 08:12:54+00:00): Witaj, poprosiliście o weryfikację.

Jedyne co mogę zasugerować to zapoznanie się z domyślnymi tagami dostępowymi https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Poland. Tak aby nie dodawać zbędnych wartości ;-). Pozdrawiam!
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2023-03-21 04:46:37+00:00): 你确定这是在修正翻译而不是在搞乱翻译吗？
nevw (2023-02-24 01:45:33+00:00): Hi, you have added Price Attack Rouse Hill details to the whole of the shopping centre in this edit.
nevw (2023-02-24 04:58:16+00:00): I reverted this.
The Warringah Mall one seems to be corrected added. Maybe copy that method for the Rouse Hill shop.
Supaplex (2023-05-06 11:35:37+00:00): 為何移除Wikidata連結？
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132948241
mueschel (2023-09-19 07:59:52+00:00): Hallo,
du hast hier viele neue Radwege eingetragen - allerdings waren viele davon schon vorher erfasst mit "cycleway" Tags an den Straßen. Beides zusammen ist leider nicht richtig und führt jetzt dazu, dass es an vielen Stellen zwei Radwege zu geben scheint, wo tatsächlich nur einer existiert. Hier müsste noch deutlich nachgearbeitet werden, damit die Daten wieder mit der Wirklichkeit übereinstimmen.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:10:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:10:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
EvanSiroky (2023-03-01 05:55:30+00:00): Hello again! I see that you requested a review of this changeset, so I'm giving it a review.

It looks like you've started from scratch and simply changed this area to be of a farmland type. This is fine as it is.

However, I do see that all of the other tags were removed. The address tags did provide useful information as did the name. Information about the name and address would actually add value to this map. I'd recommend adding those back as you see fit.
AjBelnuovo (2023-05-10 17:46:04+00:00): Qual é a fonte dos nomes que você colocou ?
Frans S (2023-02-24 09:21:17+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, during the validation process
I noticed that you are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.
We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. Just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.
Each building need to be squared.
Nodes of buildings may not connect to other buildings or features.
The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 
Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.

This kind of tasks are rather difficult. Even for an experienced mapper.
Please select a somewhat easier task to start with. ( On this project only dense urban tasks are still open for mapping. Select another project.)
woodpeck_repair (2023-03-03 00:50:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 133232206, 133232218, 133232224, 133232227, 133232225, 133232208, 133232216, 133232213, 133232177, 133232229, 133232203, 133232220, 133232198, 133232180, 133232189, 133224701, 133232215, 133232214, 133232188, 133232199, 133232207, 133232205, 133232182, 133232222, 133232186, 133232200, 133232191, 133232223, 133232209, 133232169, 133232230, 133232194, 133232197, 133232210 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import with unclear licensing in Madagascar
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-24 06:57:05+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1149018966
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/408565257

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Frans S (2023-03-08 12:33:32+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, during the validation process
I noticed that you are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.
We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. Just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.
Please map each building accurate over the rooflines.
Square each rectangular building with the Q key.
Nodes of buildings may NOT  connect to other buildings or features.
The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 
Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.




See also this documenthttps://drive.google.com/file/d/11PsAW0bzUZHbS8YnbaFzqOYhJY7tSPYG/view?usp=share_link


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132949979
Frans S (2023-03-08 12:32:15+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, during the validation process
I noticed that you are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.
We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. Just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.
Please map each building accurate over the rooflines.
Square each rectangular building with the Q key.
Nodes of buildings may NOT  connect to other buildings or features.
The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 
Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.




See also this documenthttps://drive.google.com/file/d/11PsAW0bzUZHbS8YnbaFzqOYhJY7tSPYG/view?usp=share_link


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132950044
Frans S (2023-03-08 12:31:32+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, during the validation process
I noticed that you are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.
We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. Just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.
Please map each building accurate over the rooflines.
Square each rectangular building with the Q key.
Nodes of buildings may NOT  connect to other buildings or features.
The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 
Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.




See also this documenthttps://drive.google.com/file/d/11PsAW0bzUZHbS8YnbaFzqOYhJY7tSPYG/view?usp=share_link


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132950578
Mundilfari (2023-02-25 05:23:33+00:00): Please do not replace spelled out names by abbreviations. Abbreviating something is easy for a data consumer to do; while correctly resolving abbreviations is not.  These types of "fixes" are a step backwards.

Quoting directly from the wiki: "If the name can be spelled without an abbreviation, then don't abbreviate it. Computers can easily shorten words, but not the other way (St. could be Street or Saint)."

See here for more details:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Abbreviations
mavl (2023-04-23 16:01:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:06:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:10:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:59:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:07:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:50:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:56:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:59:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:07:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:54:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:52:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
Mapper84 (2023-02-25 02:29:47+00:00): I see the possible import tag. I used copy paste a fair bit for mapping this military area.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132951284
eggie (2023-02-24 07:08:28+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback.....   Beginnersfoutje...  Wanneer een bedrijf verdwijnt zal het adres gewoon in stand blijvne. Dus voortaan alleen de bedrijfsinfo van de adresnode verwijderen. 
MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-02-24 07:10:42+00:00): adresnode hersteld..
eggie (2023-02-24 07:14:35+00:00): Alle begin is moeilijk.
Goe om zaken actueel te maken. 
Editor iD vraag om van alles in te vullen, maar et meeste is gewoon 'default'
Motorvoertuigen en fietsen mogen gewoon overal komen behalve als er een verbod is.
Ik haal de overbodige tagging weer weg.
Je eigen edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=132951632
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-02-24 07:17:51+00:00): access=permissive en de overige overbodige accesstags verwijderd.
mapse
eggie
bradrh (2023-02-24 22:13:51+00:00): Please keep you changesets confined to a smaller area. thx
rmksowmw (2023-03-01 07:22:44+00:00): Hello,

Thank you for reviewing my changeset 132951701 and highlighting the issue. We always confine our edits to small geographical location and this is an honest mistake from our end. Going ahead, we will ensure not to repeat such errors again. We are looking forward to learn more from you

Regards,
rmksowmw.
eggie (2023-02-24 07:21:23+00:00): Hoi  Skythelimit..
Zelfde verhaal...  Wanneer het een BAG adresis (Import kadaster)  dan de adressen intact laten svp.
Wellicht zitten de adressen er nog in, want dit waren geen importadressen. 
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=132951963

Veel plezier met mappen verder.

eggie
eggie (2023-02-25 08:50:17+00:00): Adresnodes hersteld
sanchi (2023-02-24 14:30:31+00:00): Buenas.
Por favor mirar el historico de la zona de loq ue editais. Ya es la segunda vez que me encuentro este mismo caso que tengo que revertir. Aquí actualmente hay una rotonda, antiguamente la atravesaba una carretera pero ya no es así. Mirar antes de editar este tipo de cosas si las ediciones son posteriores a las fotos.
Gracias
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132951997
Yana Lauryk (2023-02-27 07:57:09+00:00): Buenas tardes. Las imágenes de Bing eran de 2021, por lo que pensé que estaban actualizadas y las edité. Gracias por inspeccionar la zona en busca de correcciones, a partir de ahora comprobaré con más atención las distintas fuentes.
Hello. The street view of Bing were taken in 2021 so I thought they were up to date and re-mapped according to it. Thank you for checking the area for corrections, I will check different sources more carefully.
gscholz (2023-02-24 07:11:23+00:00): Hi abebayehuz,
I have reverted this changeset to fix the errors discussed in your other contributions.

Here is view showing a part of the errors your imports create:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=38.62302&lat=8.97263&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

Please have a look at our documentation about how to handle gps tracks properly:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Convert_GPS_tracks

Guido
Glassman (2023-02-26 19:01:24+00:00): #TIP: don't use descriptive names like field or bluff. The tags are sufficient. Can you fix your edit? I'll send more info on OSM in a message.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132952769
gscholz (2023-02-24 07:13:17+00:00): Hi abebayehuz,
I have reverted this changeset to fix the errors discussed in your other contributions.

Here is view showing a part of the errors your imports create:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=38.62302&lat=8.97263&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

Please have a look at our documentation about how to handle gps tracks properly:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Convert_GPS_tracks

Guido
Baloo Uriza (2023-03-02 17:48:12+00:00): Please don't add superflous nodes to transition areas.
akuksouski_lyft (2023-03-03 12:53:13+00:00): Hi, Baloo Uriza! My name is Alexander and I am a mapper of the OSM Team at Lyft.

If I interpreted the changeset data correctly, there were no geometry edits in this changeset, only tag updates, and the geometry of the link road was modified in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114811451 
However, thank you for your note, we will take into account your comment and will avoid such geometry changes in future. Please let me know if I missed anything.

Best regards,
Alexander
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-01 14:01:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 174063813, 174063778, 174063039, 174063675, 174063839, 174063864, 174063733, 174063852, 174063722, 174063049, 174063081, 174063378, 174063746, 174063119, 174063802, 174063878 where the changeset comment is: Following a DWG complaint, reverting a dubious import.  See e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1311170850 https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18848
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-01 14:01:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 174063813, 174063778, 174063039, 174063675, 174063839, 174063864, 174063733, 174063852, 174063722, 174063049, 174063081, 174063378, 174063746, 174063119, 174063802, 174063878 where the changeset comment is: Following a DWG complaint, reverting a dubious import.  See e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1311170850 https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18848
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2023-03-01 23:59:48+00:00): Hvad er Orkideen?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1149057536
osmviborg (2023-03-02 05:42:22+00:00): Hvad tror du selv?
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2023-03-02 13:42:32+00:00): Det ved jeg ikke. Den er ikke på mine luftfotos. Men jeg kan se at du har tagget den som proposed residential, så det forklarer at jeg ikke kunne se den.
osmviborg (2023-03-02 13:53:00+00:00): Midt i en greenfield, kom ind i kampen.
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2023-03-02 16:14:01+00:00): Det kunne jo have været en sti.
Men jeg ville have gættet på residential. Og du havde sat lokalplanen på en note.
gscholz (2023-02-28 08:09:18+00:00): Hi Evarist Isdory_ImportAccount,
your recent import activities have created several errors in the OSM database regarding not connected ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=34.37834&lat=-1.45876&zoom=10&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=132953556

As you may know, those kind of ways cannot be used by routing software. Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Kovoschiz (2023-02-24 08:43:50+00:00): Hi please see previous discussions on the subject. 
1. This is not in Expressway Area. Together with Tunnel Area, the usage of `=motorway`, `=trunk`, and `=primary`   is debated. As a stop-gap, `=motorway_link` has been applied to them. 
2. Route 8 ends east of the bridge. It doesn't include the sea channel crossing.
Kovoschiz (2023-02-24 08:46:12+00:00): 1. In this case, it is because the sections of  Airport Rd  concerned is only connected to Expressway due to partial interchanges.
Kovoschiz (2023-02-24 09:06:52+00:00): 3. Tung Wing Road is Tunnel Area. Therefore under existing guidelines, it is `=motorway`. However, this was not followed in Discovery Bay Tunnel.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-24 07:10:22+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1149059460

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab (2023-02-24 10:10:30+00:00): Adres został już poprawiony, pozdrawiam!
trial (2023-02-24 21:55:21+00:00): Bonjour, merci comme déjà demandé par d'autres de supprimer ces pseudo-noms (et ces fausses adresses : en France les adresse sont réservées aux points d'adresse, un chargeur n'est pas une adresse)
https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/byuser/cae42
cae42 (2023-02-26 18:18:56+00:00): Bonsoir c'est fait.