piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
aceman444 (2025-03-12 19:55:16+00:00): And especially without specifying any access permissions, which by default means only private access. Which seems not true at this parking (it is for customers).
Friendly_Ghost (2024-06-27 22:14:05+00:00): Hi voschix,

I love what you did here. I'm somewhat of an enthousiast when it comes to old fortifications, and I've visited the city walls of Padova several times without knowing much about them. I have a couple of questions for you: 

Do you know why some bastions are called "Baluardo" and others "Bastione" here? I know the words mean basically the same, but I would expect a city to be consistent in its use of the terminology. 

Do you know why Bastione del Castelnuovo (node/11831773948) is not a "Torrione"?

Could you help me to add defensive_works=* tags to the parts of the city walls? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:defensive_works
I wrote that page :)

Best regards and thanks again for mapping the city walls in more detail,

Casper
maro21 (2024-04-20 19:41:28+00:00): Proszę opisywać, co zostało zmienione. 
https://osm.wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian

Wyburzyli ten budynek i zamiast niego zbudowali boisko?
maraf24 (2024-04-20 21:20:27+00:00): Wycofałem to. Rok temu budynek na pewno był, a strona padel.pl nie działa.
Ewrt1 (2024-04-19 22:25:52+00:00): You added more than fences
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150242560
user_1168707 (2024-04-20 17:47:02+00:00): Sorry for the trouble. I will delete this account and try not to vandalise any additional maps in the future. Sorry.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150242560
Ewrt1 (2024-04-22 22:25:28+00:00): I have to clarify: It is *NOT* vandalism act you are doing. It is not vandalized, but please make better comments in future.
Reinhard12 (2024-05-13 20:54:41+00:00): Hallo Deckweiss,
du hast für den Parkplatz "Altes Dorf" access=custumers hinzugefügt. Wieso? Ist das nicht ein öffentlicher Parkplatz?
Gruß Reinhard
Deckweiss (2024-05-13 21:16:06+00:00): Der nördliche Teil von dem 2-geteilten Parkplatz ist öffentlich, der südliche nur mit Parkausweis.
Deckweiss (2024-05-13 21:17:42+00:00): Oh, jetzt sehe ich was du meinst. customers ist falsch. Ich weiß nicht wie das da hin gekommen ist. Vielleicht ein Versehen.
Reinhard12 (2024-05-15 20:39:53+00:00): access=yes gesetzt, da öffentlicher Parkplatz
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-07-02 19:11:31+00:00): artykuł z GW i https://nowawarszawa.pl/wladze-bemowa-zdecydowaly-o-zmianie-nazwy-amfiteatru-im-michaela-jacksona/ są opublikowane póxniej niż ten wpis

najwyraźniej zdanie zmienili
SomeoneElse (2024-04-21 10:08:35+00:00): Hello lekman100, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
Andy from OSM's Data Working Group here.  Someone from the Ukrainian community has been in touch about these edits - mostly that's not because of your edits, but because of various "mechanical language changes" that have happened in the past.
What might be a good thing to do would be to say something over at the Ukrainian forum https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/ua/66 explaining a bit about what you're doing.  You can write in English there - there's a translate button that allows things to be seen in other languages.
Best Regards,
Andy
lekman100 (2024-04-21 17:52:42+00:00): Hi
I want to help localize with adding name into corresponding localized name field so both main fields are set, I saw objects where was name:uk but not name and vice versa. Now they are filled both.
Signed in forum and created topic!
woodpeck (2024-04-20 07:17:04+00:00): Hello gogeminist, the edits you have been making here (setting name:uk to the same value as name when no other names are present) are unnecessary. Millions of OSM places around the world just have one single name; there's no need to make an exception for Ukraine.
gogeminist (2024-04-20 16:19:59+00:00): Hi. It seems to me like it will be more localized, is not it? I recently saw that there were a lots of objects with name:uk but without name fields, so I want to fill them to be more correctly set. Is that bad?
darkonus (2024-04-20 16:47:59+00:00): Simply copying the `name` tag to `name:uk` without any modifications is not appropriate. Consider this example: the primary `name` tag is `McDonald's`, which is used because the signage at every McDonald's in Ukraine is in English. The `name:uk` tag is `МакДональдз`, reflecting the Ukrainian version found on their website and in advertisements. The `name:en` tag remains `McDonald's` because that is the English name.

If a name does not have a Ukrainian equivalent, it should not be arbitrarily translated or transliterated from the Latin script.

Moreover, any automated changes to these tags should first be discussed within the community. Without community approval, such edits may be subject to reversal by reviewers, who would be justified in doing so.
gogeminist (2024-04-20 17:02:43+00:00): :(
swinetown (2024-04-20 00:15:58+00:00): ...plus a few edits on the Rushey Platt ind est which I forgot to save before
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-04-20 00:16:07+00:00): no longer referenced nodes will be deleted after rate limit resets
Yonseca (2024-04-20 01:38:23+00:00): Resumen: añado el contorno del puente de Pablo Picasso
MxxCon (2024-04-20 03:54:25+00:00): Hello.
Why did you change this Q? The previous one seems to be linking to the correct resource.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150245300
Toby Champion (2024-04-20 04:10:02+00:00): Hi. The way is Collect Pond Park, not Collect Pond. The Wikidata ID is that of Collect Pond. So it seemed to me that I was fixing things. Still seems like that.
jnighan (2024-04-20 02:16:36+00:00): "In August 1968, parishioners were saddened by a fire that destroyed St. Maurice School. The institution never reopened"--Facebook, viewed Apr. 19, 2024: post in I Remember New Britain, published March 5, 2021 https://www.facebook.com/groups/artap5/posts/3734452319924175/
jmty8 (2024-10-17 08:40:08+00:00): Hello 快乐的老鼠宝宝, wanted to tell you that your roundabout were ruined, please take a look. Maybe if you're a local mapper you can verify the edit or revert the changes. I can help you with reverting if you'll need. the place is here https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=19/39.041765/115.882671

Used Papago translation just in case: 你好快乐的老鼠宝宝，想告诉你，你的回旋处被毁了，请看一看。 也许如果你是本地映射器，你可以验证编辑或还原更改。 如果你需要的话，我可以帮你恢复。
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2024-10-24 13:36:13+00:00): no problem, Xiongan is still in fast construction and not stable, we can mapper later when major constuction finished. 

Thank you for notice me about this!
Supaplex (2024-05-29 03:54:26+00:00): Revert due to it is a fake bus station

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151969677
user_11609320 (2024-04-20 03:32:27+00:00): the imperial beach side of coronado avenue is called imperial beach boulevard
mikimapbuilder (2024-04-22 06:29:04+00:00): Building changed to landuse
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-04-21 21:43:45+00:00): Please don't remove highway tags or use promotional descriptions.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150247258
DavidKarlas (2024-05-11 03:41:54+00:00): What is source of this data? For example https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11832189078 is there really village called Schools?
marczoutendijk (2024-04-24 20:22:25+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1274317737
What is the meaning of parking=1
Is that meant to be the capacity?
Please read this:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
silversurfer83 (2024-04-20 12:49:56+00:00): Grüße dich :)

hier ein Hinweis zu der Tankstelle:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150261940
ist noch nicht perfekt, aber "layer=-1" war nicht optimal ;)

cheers
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150247984
SG86 (2024-04-21 05:42:18+00:00): Hallo silversurfer83,
danke für die Info.
Viele Grüße 
SG86
aceman444 (2024-05-18 16:12:27+00:00): Zdravim, preco je na cestach ako https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/365196944 strkovy povrch? Predtym tam bol asfalt. Nieco na tych cestach robia?
ftcat (2024-04-20 05:59:10+00:00): Hi please don't tag ways with the name=no
Glassman (2024-04-30 20:15:47+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150248123
hatul (2024-10-30 12:06:36+00:00): ידוע לך אם המעבר מתחת לכביש נפתח? בפייסבוק משתמש כתב שכנראה שכן.
https://www.facebook.com/groups/israelhikingmap/posts/8560249680696816/
Car162 (2024-11-03 17:45:44+00:00): אני לא בטוח אם המעבר נפתח או לא נפתח לתנועה
hatul (2024-11-03 19:37:41+00:00): תודה, אנסה לברר אצל אחרים
nevw (2024-04-20 07:15:23+00:00): Hi, we are not permitted to use Google as a source for editing the OpenStreetMap
nevw (2024-04-20 07:16:52+00:00): Google does not permit this use under it’s terms and conditions
nevw (2024-04-20 07:28:44+00:00): This changeset was reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150250206
Please remap using a permitted source like a survey in person
ftcat (2024-04-20 06:23:10+00:00): Revert Changeset: 150248303, which contained large scale deletions of relations. Not sure id in error or vandalism.
flohoff (2024-04-20 12:59:47+00:00): Moin,
weil ich zufällig den changeset mit den wegen auf dem Friedhof gesehen habe. Das mit dem highway=footway ist okay.

foot=yes ist dann überflüssig, ist ja ein footway, bicycle=no ist unnötig da fahrräder auf einem footway eh nicht erlaubt sind, ebenso horse=no

Siehe die defaults für Deutschland:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Germany

Flo
user_10799485 (2024-04-20 18:23:07+00:00): Ok, ok mein Freund.
mueschel (2024-04-21 10:30:42+00:00): Hi,
you uploaded a large amount of objects here, but all of them don't have any proper tag.
If you want to add boundaries to OSM, please check how they need to be tagged. And, most importantly, please check our guidelines for importing data:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
mueschel (2024-04-21 11:49:19+00:00): All these nodes don't have valid tags. Please check and fix this.
empty_child (2024-04-20 19:30:04+00:00): Why?
Akita777 (2024-04-21 16:48:22+00:00): I needed it for a while
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-11 15:29:42+00:00): Hi Maruti Chilame, welcome to OSM.

May we know the source of your data import?

Thanks.
silversurfer83 (2024-04-20 08:04:26+00:00): Gude :)

bin ich vor kurzem dran vorbeigefahren und dachte noch "ob die wohl in der Karte sind?"

Da sie aber nicht mehr genutzt werden empfehle ich hier die lifecycle prefixes zu verwenden:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix

cheers
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150249958
Siegmarer (2024-04-20 08:15:29+00:00): Hallo, es soll ja auch auf OpenRailwayMaps erscheinen, bei speziellen Tags bin ich da skeptisch ob das funktioniert bzw. gerendert wird. Für mich sind beim Bahngleise taggen vorwiegend die razed, abandoned bzw. disused wichtig. Ich habs mal auf "stillgelegt" angepasst.

Ein genauer Nutzungszyklus ist mir leider auch nicht bekannt.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150249958
silversurfer83 (2024-04-20 11:26:10+00:00): Hi

wenn ich mir die definition so ansehe könnte disused passen :)
ThatPCDude (2024-04-20 07:44:08+00:00): Weitere Änderungen im 278 folgen.
Tjuro (2024-04-20 08:08:48+00:00): Beste StefanVerkerk,

Prima dat je verschillende wegen open hebt gezet, maar je hebt hierbij de verchillende classificaties niet overgenomen vanuit construction=

Nu zitten er classificatie fouten in. Zou je dit op kunnen lossen. Zie:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=150250715
A67-A67 (2024-04-20 09:55:15+00:00): Er moest hier nog veel meer gebeuren, zoals het veranderen van busroutes etc. Ik ben hiermee bezig.
HellMap (2024-04-20 09:49:10+00:00): Hi!

Are you sure you are doing these highway area conversions correctly?

My understanding is that `area:highway` is the geometry of a 
single road - basically representing the same thing as the road way, but full width/shape. It is generally implied all travel happens along the main way and not everywhere in the area. On the other hand, `highway` + `area=yes` is a location where traffic can move in every direction - there is no obvious middle or direction.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:area:highway#Differentiation_area:highway_vs._area=yes_on_a_highway
richlv (2024-06-07 10:44:37+00:00): Jā, šis neizskatās līdz galam pareizi, nomainīšu uz area=yes.

Šo arī būtu jauki apspriest OSM Latvijas kopienas čatā :)
https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com
matteo564 (2024-08-26 16:16:28+00:00): i cartelli sulla via cmq non riportano il numero in lettere ma in cifre romane
Andrea Musuruane (2024-08-27 07:26:39+00:00): Qui puoi leggere la convenzione italiana sui nomi delle strade: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Editing_Standards_and_Conventions#Nomi_delle_strade
empty_child (2024-04-20 19:29:06+00:00): Hello
It's not a copy of this route (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17431742)?
uak (2024-04-20 20:12:03+00:00): Both OSM relations model the same bus route. But it seems they disagree on the bus stops, both on the number of bus stops and the placements of all bus stops. This is why it was possible that it was not detected that the same bus route was already modeled.

Are you sure that the bus stops of https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17431742 are correct?
empty_child (2024-04-20 20:17:16+00:00): Could you merge them (I mean tags, because I added only based on news)?
uak (2024-04-20 22:10:41+00:00): Sure. However, this would mostly result in your relations vanishing, because they do not seem to have additional information except for the names in the Russian language.
empty_child (2024-04-20 22:16:58+00:00): It's not a big problem
uak (2024-04-21 09:51:54+00:00): I have merged the relations: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150294450
osmviborg (2024-04-20 08:38:51+00:00): double up https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/51449972
b-holdet (2024-04-20 12:55:06+00:00): Hej Kristian, Du har tegnet broen oven i broen. Retter du den selv?
eggie (2024-04-20 10:44:31+00:00): Beste.. Geef concreet aan wat je hebt hedaan. Ik woon hier zegt niemand iets.
Mvg
eggie
SekeRob (2024-04-22 13:33:49+00:00): smoking=yes > =outside (popular) or outdoor(rare) per Taginfo
Tomasz Buchholz (2025-02-06 11:20:22+00:00): Cześć,
Skąd jest informacja, że ta budowana droga na osiedlu Apartamenty Płużnicka to jest Trakt Nadwiślański?

Wg strony dewelopera jest to wewnętrzna droga oraz na geoportalu Trakt Nadwiślański kończy się na północ od osiedla.
dvdhoven (2024-04-20 10:09:47+00:00): Ik heb deze changeset reverted.
Er liggen 2 bruggen in de Europaweg, dus het fietspad heeft geen tunnel.
De combinatie brug + tunnel mag niet in OSM, het is of een brug of een tunnel.
En je kunt er vanuit gaan, dat andere mappers eerder hier al lang over nagedacht hebben.
Bovendien had je, door het tunneldeel opnieuw in te tekenen, rcn route 24-45 onderbroken.

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
Dinxperlöer (2024-04-20 11:05:36+00:00): ok
rskedgell (2024-04-20 11:16:38+00:00): Many thanks for adding this detail.

When you're adding separate sidewalks, you can also add tags to the parent street, so that routers and renderers know that they're present.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sidewalk#Separately_mapped_sidewalks
bgleb (2024-04-20 12:49:34+00:00): I will do this as well. It is easier to add those tags with JOSM, so they will be split across several changesets
mueschel (2024-04-21 10:39:48+00:00): Hi,
you uploaded a large amount of objects here, but all of them don't have any proper tag.
If you want to add boundaries to OSM, please check how they need to be tagged. And, most importantly, please check our guidelines for importing data:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
eggie (2024-04-20 10:41:07+00:00): Beste ...

Zou je concreet willen aangeven wat je hier allemaal hebt aangepast.
Ik heb dit gezien zegt niemand wat.
Beperk svp ook het gebied van je edits.
Mvg
eggie
Dinxperlöer (2024-04-20 11:35:08+00:00): links en rechts wat prullenbakken en in dinxperlo heb ik speeltuintjes met speeltoestellen toegevoegd. losse wijzingen zien jullie dus niet apart terug komen, ok thanks voor de tips
eggie (2024-04-20 11:37:42+00:00): 👍
Jakuje (2024-07-02 19:56:03+00:00): Ahoj. Tady se ti podarilo nakreslit dva billboardy https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11832580311 a https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11832580312 vedle sebe. Jsou tam opravdu dva, nebo se jedna o "preklep"? Na fotomapach je jen jeden ...
xpisar (2024-07-03 17:27:44+00:00): Tehdy tam byly určitě dva. Zítra to ověřím na místě.
xpisar (2024-07-05 08:32:55+00:00): Máte pravdu, billboard blíže silnice je pryč. Smazal jsem ho.
Tomas Straupis (2024-04-20 14:07:24+00:00): Laba diena. iD redaktorius nesąmones rodo su „pasenusiais“ žymėjimais, nereikia jo klausyti. Atstatysiu sugadintas kūdros žymas.
Tomas Straupis (2024-04-20 14:14:16+00:00): Ir miško žymėjimo nereikėjo keisti, jis teisingai buvo pažymėtas landuse=forest. Pradedantiems žymėtojams siūlyčiau nepulti „taisyti“, nes dažniausiai tai nebus taisymas :-)
Tatfahren (2024-04-20 12:43:29+00:00): Man kann statt das zu löschen den "demolished:" prefix anwenden, hauptsächlich um zu Kennzeichnen das kein Baum mehr da ist, damit dieser nicht über veraltete Quellen wieder neu eingetragen wird.

Wenn der Baumstumpf noch vorhanden ist kann man den auch noch als solchen eingetragen lassen. Sollte das Naturdenkmal etwa mit Tafel ausgewiesen sein, oder mit einer solchen daran erinnert werden, kann diese auch eingetragen werden.

Gerne kann ich den Baum zur Wahrung der Objekthistorie mit Josm wieder herstellen, wenn du das nicht selber machen willst. Dann kann dieser angepasst werden statt etwa einen neuen stumpf zu erstellen.
Sajeevini sivajothy (2024-05-26 17:44:11+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work, and it looks good.#OMGuru#OSMCha
But Also, Try to Draw accurate Square-shaped Buildings. Use the "Q" Key to Change your building to Square.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150256773
Sajeevini sivajothy (2024-05-26 17:45:48+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work, and it looks good.#OMGuru#OSMCha
But Also, Try to Draw accurate Square-shaped Buildings. Use the "Q" Key to Change your building to Square.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150256773
Tomas Straupis (2024-04-20 14:34:39+00:00): Čia paredaguotas VIENAS SEGMENTAS Kruojos, tai žymos netinka. Ilgis šiaip tai pagal geometriją gali būti paskaičiuojamas, bet suprantu norą turėti oficialų ilgį - perkėliau jį į Kruojos visos upės objektą (ryšį) ir į žymą „length“.
J8K34CXB1V (2024-04-20 11:07:56+00:00): ة
eggie (2024-04-20 10:59:23+00:00): Beste   Zou je willen aangeven wat je hebt gezien en aangepast?

MVG
eggie
Dinxperlöer (2024-04-20 11:09:09+00:00): heb een looppad verwijderd en een bos waar een huis nu wordt gebouwd. en brievenbus op een nauwkeuriger verplaatst. waarom is het gele vlak zo groot?
Dinxperlöer (2024-04-20 11:10:09+00:00): zal vaker moeten opslaan verwacht ik om niet extreem grote gele/orange vlakken te krijgen.
eggie (2024-04-20 11:26:03+00:00): Precies...dan voorkom je dat.
Schuiven met de kaart in editmodus met editor iD geeft ook vaak schade omdat je dan per ongeluk nodes kunt verplaatsen.

 Ik heb je nog een PB gestuurd met 'opnieuw welkom ' met wat handige links en tips.

Mapse..
eggie
GinaroZ (2025-01-06 00:49:10+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11832713558 is this actually a post office or just the delivery office?
LonMcGregor (2025-01-06 10:34:44+00:00): Delivery office, yes. Didn't realise these were tagged differently in OSM. Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161051557
GinaroZ (2025-01-06 17:29:36+00:00): Thanks :) (I've changed it to an area and updated the name)
Also I noticed this note if you've not seen it about a possible duplicate you added? https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4556145
LonMcGregor (2025-01-06 19:00:25+00:00): I will have another look when I next walk past there. Thanks
StefanHRT (2024-04-20 11:27:53+00:00): Bin gespannt, ob das mit dem Tierpark so bleibt. Wurde schon einmal angepasst (soweit ich weis sogar anhand des Lageplans und Daten aus dem Liegenschaftskataster/ALKIS) , aber dann in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/134327850 zurückgesetzt.
erde23 (2024-04-20 12:39:12+00:00): Ich war ganz arglos und wusste nicht, dass das hier schon diskutiert wurde. 
Der eine Parkplatz war übrigens vorher schon Teil des Zoogeländes, der andere nicht. 
Und außerdem sind Schaugelände und Backstagebreiche bei ein Zoo immer eng verwoben. Das kann man m.E. gar nicht sinnvoll trennen. Mal abwarten. VG!
StefanHRT (2024-04-20 13:43:41+00:00): Diskutiert wurde es nicht, aber in dem CS wieder nur auf den Besucherbereich reduziert, obwohl der Lageplan vor Ort auch den Wirtschaftshof und alle Parkplätze beinhaltet, welche auch beim Amt zu dem Gelände gehören
empty_child (2024-04-20 19:24:54+00:00): Добрый день
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1161179045
Нет. НЕТ. Там физически за 9 месяцев не могло появиться 70-этажное здание
Частичный откат
user_17222985 (2024-04-20 11:44:54+00:00): прибрано назву вулиця Швецова  з лороги яка має іншу назву
wkdgs (2024-04-29 07:52:49+00:00): Hi, erstmal herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.

Es sieht so aus als wäre das Gebäude hauptsächlich oder zum Teil ein Kindergarten. Dann passt es nicht, als Namen des Gebäudes die Bibliothek anzugeben.

In dem Fall, sollte man einen Punkt im Gebäude anlegen, und daran alle Infos zur Bibliothek eintragen. Weil es den Punkt sogar schon gibt, habe ich den Namen am Gebäude wieder entfernt.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150259479
mcliquid (2024-04-20 13:26:43+00:00): Hi,

please note: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:web to
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-23 09:42:07+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11832776449/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
tykayn (2025-04-23 09:44:58+00:00): Hello, it is a closed space for horses, i did not know what to put here, there is a fence all around.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-24 02:08:40+00:00): are horses permanently there as some kind of exhibit?

or is it place where people bring horses to train/get through obstacle course?
tykayn (2025-04-24 09:45:01+00:00): there are no obstacles, and yes, horses are here permanently, they are owned by the farm nearby
LuxuryCoop (2024-04-24 01:11:39+00:00): 직접 오픈스트리트맵에 가입해 주셔서 감사드립니다!
지도를 직접 편집하면 참조만 다는 것에 비해 더 많은 정보를 넣을 수 있고, 업로드 즉시 변경 내용을 홈페이지 지도에서 볼 수 있습니다. 기타 OSM 기반 앱(OSMAnd, Organic Maps, ...)에는 최대 1달 뒤에 반영됩니다.

지도가 바로 갱신되지 않는다면 Ctrl+F5로 웹 브라우저의 캐시를 지운 뒤 새로고침하면 지도가 갱신됩니다.
nevw (2024-04-21 07:52:23+00:00): Most, if not all, of the playgrounds you have mapped do not exist.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dplayground
michael60634 (2024-04-30 20:38:50+00:00): I've reverted this changeset as these playgrounds don't actually exist.