piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2026-03-07 13:05:53+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
Issues found on your mappings
E: Buildings are often not squared .
G: Included the shadow of the building.


Explanation can be found in this document which  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179473141
jleedev (2026-04-12 18:39:26+00:00): You are looking for `amenity=parking_space`.
BubbaJuice (2026-03-07 05:44:07+00:00): Also used USGS Topo Map layer.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-04-04 19:28:08+00:00): Hello!

You used
crossing:markings=ladderS
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13624482648/history

Have you maybe meant
crossing:markings=ladder
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
iandees (2026-03-07 06:28:43+00:00): Node 8527516081 was reverted (accidental drag detected by node-drag-watcher).
NeisBot (2026-03-07 06:15:48+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13624503745 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Insurance office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-15 17:33:05+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179910352
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-17 07:30:46+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with advertising/malformed tags and explicit source=* of Google Maps, which is not allowed by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ), in changeset 184212649

https://osm.org/changeset/184212649
iandees (2026-03-07 06:29:46+00:00): Node 9750865133 was reverted (accidental drag detected by node-drag-watcher).
mcliquid (2026-03-07 08:44:26+00:00): Pro Ladepunkt sind vermutlich nicht 400 LKWs möglich. Das wären hier in Summe sonst 1600 LKWs :) Ich hab's korrigiert.
NeisBot (2026-03-07 07:03:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13624521860 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Water damage restoration facility"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-03-15 17:33:06+00:00): ❌ Text fixed by https://osm.org/changeset/179483573
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-15 10:39:42+00:00): Cleaned up remaining SEO spam and other tagging for POI in changeset 184130613

https://osm.org/changeset/184130613
mcliquid (2026-03-07 08:32:15+00:00): "amenity=charging_point" gibt es nicht. Ich hab es hier wieder zurück zu charging_station geändert.
NeisBot (2026-03-07 07:23:22+00:00): Hi HobokenMapper, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 96% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 5 amenity(s)
- 1 barrier(s)
- 3 building(s)
- 4 highway(s)
- 9 landuse(s)
- 6 leisure(s)
- 13 name(s)
- 57 natural(s)
- 2 shop(s)
- 10 tourism(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179476590
mcliquid (2026-03-07 08:46:42+00:00): socket:css und max_power sowie max_power:unit gibt es nicht. Hab es korrigiert.
NeisBot (2026-03-07 07:57:39+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 35 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/875071351 v3 | 15 crossings
https://osm.org/way/875075244 v3 | 9 crossings
https://osm.org/way/875062024 v8 | 7 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/8145500297 v3

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179477206
NeisReview (2026-03-15 17:33:08+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/179582188
NeisBot (2026-03-07 08:03:47+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13624596364 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Mental health clinic"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-03-15 17:33:07+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/179477700
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-04 04:12:53+00:00): Cleaned up remaining spammy tags on SEO POI "IN Focus First" in changeset 183621923

https://osm.org/changeset/183621923
FajrAl (2026-03-11 03:14:43+00:00): Untuk lahan sawah, gunakan tag tambahan crop=rice, karena farmland masih umum.
Frans S (2026-03-07 13:26:37+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
You ignored the warnings on the issue triangle about not tagging buildings.
To me it seems that you added the same buildings again, already mapped by another mapper. (and not tagged either)
I corrected them
eggie (2026-03-07 09:18:04+00:00): review_requested 	yes
Dag Wouter... lijkt me oke.
MVG
eggie
cyclist789 (2026-03-07 09:04:12+00:00): (I also adjusted a few highways.)
mat (2026-03-08 07:17:46+00:00): Bonjour, le segment dont vous avez modifié le sens de circulation doit faire dans les 10km, est-ce que cette route est vraiment à sens unique sur toute cette longueur ?
eggie (2026-03-07 09:48:29+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback Woonplaats toegevoegd.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
VLD0251 (2026-04-01 19:28:20+00:00): Hi! "إبتدائية" (Primary) is a purely descriptive term and should not be used as a name.
Please enter only the official, verifiable name or leave the field blank.
Happy mapping!
See: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179482185
eggie (2026-03-07 10:04:11+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Till_btn (2026-03-07 09:57:27+00:00): Hallo, willkommen bei OSM :)
du hast hier versehentlich "oneway:bicycle=no" entfernt, welches genau diese Freigabe für Fahrradfahrer dargestellt hat. Jetzt ist nur noch "oneway=yes" eingetragen, was alle Fahrzeuge betreffen würde. Ich werde das mal eben korrigieren
Matete93 (2026-03-07 10:00:13+00:00): Hmm, aber wenn ich vom Lüner Weg zum Markt mit dem Rad fahren will, leitet mich OSM immer über den Schifferwall und Reichenbachstraße anstatt einfach geradeaus über den Stint zu fahren - also irgendwas ist da noch blockiert
Till_btn (2026-03-07 10:01:30+00:00): Nutzt du den Router hier direkt auf der Website? Verschiedene Router werten die Daten unterschiedlich aus
Matete93 (2026-03-07 10:02:31+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_bicycle&route=53.2532999%2C10.4192261%3B53.250468%2C10.4086632#map=17/53.251867/10.413934
Till_btn (2026-03-07 10:08:05+00:00): Das liegt dann hier an der OSRM-Routing-Engine. Wenn du GraphHopper/Valhalla auswählst bekommst du den direktesten Weg.
Generell kann ich auch den Bikerouter sehr empfehlen, da gibt es noch diverse andere Routing-Profile: https://bikerouter.de/#map=16/53.2498/10.4073/osm-mapnik-german_style&lonlats=10.418608,53.252028;10.408613,53.250347&profile=trekking
Matete93 (2026-03-07 10:23:07+00:00): aaah super, danke dir!
ڕاستی (2026-07-23 11:03:49+00:00): ناوی گوندت گۆڕییە دیسان؟؟؟
stundenuhr (2026-03-11 10:57:24+00:00): Danke für die Überprüfung vor Ort!
フーヴァー　リー (2026-03-07 12:58:16+00:00): 您好，感谢您完善嘉善。这边发现您使用的地图数据有点过时了，例如祥符荡石坝附近的步行道路并不正确。其次，村庄部分在完善建筑前加入道路我认为并不明智。
Supaplex (2026-07-05 03:46:07+00:00): HI 两眼含迷雾

This is a questionable subjective object you added:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13624792722

OpenStreetMap is a public collaborative geographic database by people around the world. We don't accept subjective objects.

I have removed the questionable stuff. Don't do it again.

--Auto-translation by Google Translate--

嗨，两眼含迷雾

您添加的这个主观对象有问题：

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13624792722

OpenStreetMap 是一个由世界各地的人们共同维护的公共协作地理数据库。我们不接受主观对象。

我已经删除了有问题的内容。请不要再这样做了。

Dennis Raylin Chen
Data Working Group, OpenStreetMap Foundation
data@osmfoundation.org
[Ticket#2026070510000081]
Berlin53 (2026-03-15 12:10:44+00:00): Die Schnellerstr. geht nicht nur an einer Seite der Verkehrsinsel auf Höhe Nr. 84 vorbei, sondern teilt sich auf. Wenn schon so detailliert mappen, dann aber auch richtig.
Berlin53 (2026-03-15 12:37:52+00:00): Bitte auch deine anderen Änderungen noch mal kritisch ansehen
hubandspoke (2026-03-15 12:53:54+00:00): Das stimmt natürlich, danke für den Hinweis! Ich passe es entsprechend an. Ist dir ansonsten noch was spezifisches aufgefallen oder war das ein allgemeiner Hinweis?
eggie (2026-03-07 11:08:43+00:00): Hoi   , Waar je vooral op moet letten is dat je geen paden vastplakt aan de landuse bos of gras.
Je kunt plakken voorkomen door tijdens intekenen de linker alttoets te gebruiken. 
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=179485452

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-03-07 11:13:14+00:00): Fietspadkruising losgemaakt van dat grasvlak.
eggie (2026-03-07 11:14:55+00:00): Tip   Waar de paden zijn verdwenen kun je het beste de landuse netjes laten aansluiten anders gaat wellicht een medemapper die paden weer intekenen.
eggie (2026-03-07 11:17:29+00:00): Misschien heb je nog iets aan deze januari Satfoto
https://viewer.satellietdataportaal.nl/@52.30785,4.987299,18/?datastrip=20260118_PNEO-04&sensorname=Pleiades-NEO
eggie (2026-03-07 11:27:09+00:00): Wanneer je wandelroutes wil aanpassen dan zul je moeten overschakelen naar editor JOSM. Dat gaat niet lukken met editor ID en zonder de nodige ervaring.

editor josm stap voor stap
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/editor-josm-stap-voor-stap/75047

Die fietspaden verleggen zal vast wel lukken.
PWeder (2026-03-07 11:31:15+00:00): Bedankt, ik ga er mee aan de slag. Al doende leert men 😅
eggie (2026-03-07 11:33:40+00:00): Dag Markus,

We taggen in OSM Nederland op de adresnodes.
Ik heb AZC Oirschot toegevoegd op de adresnode.
Zeker weten dat COA Oirschot de naam van het gebouw is?
Dat is toch de organisatie?

MVG
eggie
Markus2929 (2026-03-07 12:21:40+00:00): Hoi Eggie,

Dat was mij niet bekend, bij nader inzien is het inderdaad AZC Oirschot. 

Met vriendelijke groet,
Markus
eggie (2026-03-07 12:24:39+00:00): Oke Markus..
Dan zou je de naam van het gebouw kunnen verwijderen.
Paar keer ctrl f5 dan zie je mijn tagging met symbool.
Gr eggie
Frans S (2026-03-07 13:03:04+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 
Please do not include the shadow of a building.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179486801
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-03-07 11:19:41+00:00): wycofuje https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176673458
ڕاستی (2026-07-23 11:03:14+00:00): لێرەش دیسان کردیتە شتەک کە نافەرمی کەسییە.
ڕاستی (2026-07-23 11:02:46+00:00): برا تەمەشا دەکەم ئەتوو بە ئارەزووی ناوی فەرمی جادەت کردیتە شتەک کە ئەتوو حەزت لێیە. برا ئەوها نییە، ناکرێ بە ئارەزووی خۆت ناوان دابنێی. ناوی فەرمییان هەیە.
Frans S (2026-03-07 12:43:47+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
Issues found on your mappings
A: Inaccurate mapping. 
D: Connecting nodes to other features.
E: Buildings not squared or rounded.
G: Included the shadow of the building.

Quality prevails above quantity.
Explanation can be found in this document which  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179488414
Taya_S (2026-03-07 16:29:40+00:00): Reverted fantasy edits

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179500274
OlasMapy (2026-03-09 18:44:12+00:00): is this a fictional nation or does he have dementia
NieWnen (2026-03-07 15:18:42+00:00): Dino już był oznaczony więc powstał duplikat. Pytanie czy jest już otwarty?
Hint666 (2026-03-09 23:23:22+00:00): Tak, już otwarty
NieWnen (2026-03-10 20:13:52+00:00): Dzięki, poprawiłem.
rarad74 (2026-03-07 18:47:52+00:00): Salut. Nu mai folosi imaginile Bing deoarece sunt mai vechi de 10 ani si nici nu sunt foarte bine centrate. Foloseste ESRI standard sau ca rezerva - Mapbox.
Numai bine.
WFDaniel (2026-03-10 05:18:46+00:00): Salutare, ok. Problema e ca imaginile din satelit folosite de OSM sunt extrem de vechi si neclare, incerc sa folosesc google maps in paralel :(
rarad74 (2026-03-10 17:22:45+00:00): Tocmai ce ti-am zis ca BIng sunt cele mai vechi - celelalte mai noi. CAte despre imagini pentru OSM- avem cele mai noi imagini pe Bucuresti de la MApobox - din 2024 si 2025. Google nu poate decat sa viseze la asa ceva. Mapbox lucreaza cu osm  de ani de zile. Sunt imagini de mai putin de 3-4 ani pe valea prahovei adaugate in sfarsit anul trecut in toamna. Per total in orasele mari google este in urma la imagini fata de osm.
habi (2026-03-07 13:53:45+00:00): Hey dosm
Du hast hier einen Knoten ganz ohne jeglichen Tag gemacht.
Von den Luftbildern her könnte es ein Bänkli sein, stimmt das?
Gruss,
Habi
dosm (2026-03-07 15:50:11+00:00): Hi Habi

Ja, das war ein Bänkli. Ich hab das in einer neuen App probiert, hat wohl nicht funktioniert.

Liebe Gr"usse
Serge
habi (2026-03-07 18:02:20+00:00): Wohl nicht :)
Erstaunlich, dass OsmAnd+ den Upload eines ungetaggten Nodes erlaubt.
Ich hab's korrigiert.
Happy mapping,
Habi
dosm (2026-03-08 08:35:29+00:00): Das war StreetComplete. Eigentlich eine coole App, aber offenbar nicht tauglich um neue Dinge hinzu zu fügen.

Liebe Grüsse
Serge
habi (2026-03-08 09:32:01+00:00): Hier im Changeset steht oben "created_by=OsmAnd+ 5.2.13" :)
Rinkydink Gurglesnack (2026-03-16 20:26:37+00:00): Bei dem Gelände handelt es sich um ein ehemaliges Sonderwaffenlager der GSSD Brand. Es ist weder ein Denkmal noch ist "Little Pripjat" eine offizielle Bezeichnung sondern scheint ein Name zu sein der sich bei manchen Youtubern durchgesetzt hat die dort rumturnen. Da es der erste Eintrag des Benutzers ist und mit CoMaps erstellt wurde, ist es möglich, dass das ein privater (offline) Eintrag in CoMaps sein sollte und versehentlich als OSM hinzugefügt wurde?
streckenkundler (2026-03-21 14:54:43+00:00): Unsinn entsorgt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180211479
Das Areal ist abgesperrt und nocht öffentlich zugänglich.
Taya_S (2026-03-07 16:37:20+00:00): Please see: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19884
Frans S (2026-03-07 13:34:55+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
When an object shows no shadow, it is not to be mapped. A building shows a shadow because it is above groundlevel.
Best regards
dp7 (2026-03-09 08:47:56+00:00): Hello Vojtechzaboril
There is no peak called "Punta Cane e Gatto" here, nor anywhere else in the Monti Sibillini National Park. Please provide an explanation, otherwise this changeset will have to be reverted. Thanks.
vojtechzaboril (2026-03-09 09:45:56+00:00): Hi,
we got this as a report from our user. I deleted it now, but I'm curious why the users keep reporting this place as 'Punta Cane e Gatto' as this wasn't the first report about it. If you got any suggestions (I think you are local) why this happenes, please let me know.
Kind regards.
V
dp7 (2026-03-09 12:14:12+00:00): Thank you for your prompt response and correction.
I know the area very well, even though I haven't climbed that mountain in a while. However, I think I know what might have happened: unfortunately, in our Apennines, it often happens that some imbecile makes up the names of mountains to gain a bit of glory when they reach the summit, writing them with a marker on a rock that's left there. They then take selfies and post their conquests on social media. Among these are those who want to become legendary, writing the name on the "map you see on apps," without ever having seen a topographical map of the area and with no respect for the history of places and toponymy.
Your user probably found this rock, or maybe even wrote it.
Cheers,
D.
literan (2026-03-08 09:32:38+00:00): почему вы добавляете адрес точкой, а не ставите его на все здание?
rusjanis (2026-03-09 18:35:55+00:00): Sveiki, šīs ielas jau ir uzbūvētas un noasfaltētas?
HellMap (2026-04-21 20:18:16+00:00): Ielas vēl nav izbūvētas - aktīvi darbi. Pašlaik grantenes. Dzīvojamā zona vēl nav uzlikta. Iebraukt teorētiski var; es gan neiebraucu, jo tur būvtehnika tieši braukāja.
rusjanis (2026-04-22 04:41:57+00:00): Mjā, tad @Andis-Olaine ir pasteidzies pa priekšu nākotnei.
iandees (2026-03-07 15:20:39+00:00): Node 2558023073 was reverted (accidental drag detected by node-drag-watcher).
残阳逐流 (2026-04-21 20:58:39+00:00): 347国道是宁德线，四川段怎么全部写成沪聂线了？请及时纠正
eggie (2026-03-07 12:57:36+00:00): De default op een path is ook bicycle=yes
Wanneer je er mag fietsen kun je het toevoegen als aanwijzing voor een medemapper.
NeisBot (2026-03-07 13:03:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/596178424 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Dacia Renault dealership"
---
Например, по-неутрален и фактичен вариант на вашия текст би мог да бъде: "Автосалон Дачия Рено"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
Dimitar155 (2026-03-07 18:24:32+00:00): Благодарности за промяната! Бележката на NeisBot е коректна, желателно е да се избягва добавянето на описания, освен ако не е изрично необходимо.

Също е желателно да се добавя и категория на съответния обект. Например това е магазин за автомобили, следователно следва да има shop=car.

Поздрави,
Митко
Pieter Vander Vennet (2026-03-12 11:18:58+00:00): Hi,

You added a playground (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1486287556) in the middle of the a military domain (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/942760673)

While this could be possible, it looks really weird to me. Is this correct?
nickvet419 (2026-03-12 18:31:18+00:00): Most likley family housing nearby
nickvet419 (2026-03-12 18:56:24+00:00): looks like the playground was installed before 2011 with a large slide, swing set It was redesigned around 2021 with a new slide and swing set and other play equipment. the old large slide looks like it was placed off to the side.
george1201 (2026-03-07 22:07:04+00:00): Hallo wermak.
Beim Getränkemarkt hast du den brand-Tag nach "EDEKA" geändert. Beim Supermarkt aber nach "Edeka". Warum der Unterschied?
wermak (2026-03-08 01:31:46+00:00): Dies gibt einem der ID-Editor so zur Auswahl. Edeka-Supermarkt klein, EDEKA-Getränkemarkt groß.
george1201 (2026-03-08 21:36:16+00:00): Ok, die Frage müsste man also an den iD-Entwickler stellen.
hjmkth (2026-03-07 13:46:26+00:00): 正しくは美唄市でした。失礼しました
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-08 11:52:59+00:00): Hallo RSch99, willkommen bei OSM.

Sind die gelöschten Wege nicht mehr vorhanden, oder was ist der genauere Grund für das Entfernen?

Danke und viele Grüße
RSch99 (2026-03-08 20:04:52+00:00): Hallo pitscheplatsch,

die Wege sind im Gelände nicht mehr vorhanden und werden entsprechend auch nicht mehr genutzt. Es handelt sich dabei um forstlich genutzte Feinerschließung, die vermutlich früher einmal fehlerhaft aufgenommen wurden. Die Wege sind stark zugewuchert und teilweise von Bäumen versperrt, entsprechend auch kein durchkommen.

Viele Grüße!
Yog Sot (2026-03-07 14:50:46+00:00): it was not a sidewalk lol, but `path` and the reason is that it's not a cycleway, because a sign is missing. not only pedestrians are allowed to walk it, but motorbike can as well. 
So yeah, polish law legislation fail and mapping should reflect that
Krystek (2026-03-08 12:30:16+00:00): Plus za spostrzegawczość! Zmęczony chyba byłem, gdy nanosiłem informacje uzupełniające po poprzedniku, że nie zauważyłem tego tagu building. Dzięki za poprawienie.
eggie (2026-03-07 14:46:24+00:00): Het is een beetje trial and error in het begin.
Hier zie je dat de landuse overlapt.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=179494179

Wanneer je editor JOSM zou gebruiken heb je een goede validator. Ook kun je daarin gereedschapskisten toevoegen.
Echt goede handleidingen zijn er niet. Er zijn wel tal van filmjes te vinden op youtube,
Editor iD is geen ideale editor om landuse en water te bewerken.
Kijk eens naar editor JOSM.
In het begin lastig, maar veel mappen gaat helpen.

editor josm stap voor stap
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/editor-josm-stap-voor-stap/75047


Skills ontwikkelen kost nu eenmaal tijd.
PWeder (2026-03-07 14:50:30+00:00): Tot nu toe lukt het me niet op JOSM te installeren, ik ben geen programmeur en alleen Java op mijn PC zetten is al een bezoeking. Het introductiefilmpje was voor mij na 2 minuten al niet meer te volgen. Ik moest iets ergens invoeren???
Ik geef nog niet op.