piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-01-29 20:03:19+00:00): Firest of all, please do not advertise on OpenStreetMap. You added your Guitar lessons name to multiple places and except if you have an actual store with an entrance for customers at a specific address, you should not add this information to OSM. The name of the place should also be simple, without any description or advertisement. Before contributing to OSM, please take some time to read the official wiki, and make sure you understand what should be mapped and how. Thanks for you understanding.
Artist JAYE | GUITAR LESSONS 1-to-1 Online | For All levels - Worldwide (2025-01-29 22:56:00+00:00): Who are you? What's your name? Where can you be contacted?
You're making multiple false assumptions.
Artist JAYE | GUITAR LESSONS 1-to-1 Online | For All levels - Worldwide (2025-01-29 22:58:55+00:00): ...and you're downright rude....starting your message to us by saying "First of all..."
Artist JAYE | GUITAR LESSONS 1-to-1 Online | For All levels - Worldwide (2025-01-29 23:01:22+00:00): Especially after you were informed that the map was faulty and that it was causing difficulties in the set up, which BY ERROR caused 2 entries....least you could do is try to be helpful before making false assumptions and tampering with our entry
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-01-30 02:27:48+00:00): Please understand that "first of all" is not rude, it just means: first thing I would say. Sorry if you though otherwise. You can find more information about my account at these pages:
https://hdyc.neis-one.org/?ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy
and
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy

Can I ask if you read the openstreetmap wiki before editing? What information were you trying to add to openstreetmap? Are you giving courses at the address you added on Rue des Seigneurs or the place is not accessible to your customers? You added a node with no specific tag and a name which included unecessary information (Guitar lessons 1-to-1 Online | For all levels - Worldwide). The name of the place should be simply "Artist Jaye", and the tags should be amenity=music_school with optional musical_instrument=guitar, which I added. The other nodes were not at the correct place so I removed them. If you need help mapping other information on OSM, feel free to ask, I will be happy to help. Sorry that you though I was being rude. I just review new edits every day to keep the data quality to highest standard possible in the Quebec province.
kmpoppe (2025-01-30 16:38:43+00:00): Good afternoon Artist JAYE and ClaireMobiliteKaligrafy,

I ask you to stop the edit war about JAYE's music_school node.

JAYE, please understand that using all caps and a node name like your username is considered advertisement and spam and cannot be accepted.

The current version of the node (v10) has an acceptable name that's not spammy and reflects what the music_school is doing and can stay.

Regards

Kai
OSMF DataWorkingGroup (DWG)
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-01-30 17:40:45+00:00): Perfect for me. Thanks!
gis_shafter (2025-01-29 22:03:54+00:00): *Deleted address points that were redundant with house addresses.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-15 17:09:29+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12540772055/history has fixme:type = shop that was added in this edit
What kind of shop is here?

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop for common values - is any of them fitting?
felipeeugenio (2025-01-29 11:17:23+00:00): Se eliminan objetos inexistentes
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161879782
aharvey (2025-02-05 23:49:20+00:00): Is this based on local knowledge, or otherwise how do you know this?

At the Newell Hwy intersection here, I couldn't see any street signs on the street level imagery, and further south we don't have any street level imagery, so it's unclear.
It was originally named based on DCS data, which still records it as Sherriff. I have no local knowledge here but it appears this follows the original Sherriff street before the new bridge was built.

Based on the DCS roads data and DCS address data, Wambat Street only starts south of the lake.
NeisBot (2025-02-08 08:06:09+00:00): Hi 吾心无聊, thank you for your contribution to the OSM project.

Over your latest stretch of time, you've made at least 33 changesets with minimal or no meaningful comments.

To enhance collaboration, please consider using the comment field to describe your map changes. This helps others understand and follow your adjustments more easily. You can find guidance on good changeset comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 

Thanks!

I've also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-04-07 04:06:07+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1355085526/history has material = 1.2

What this tag means? Numeric value is unexpected here and it is unclear what it means

was it supposed to be height = 1.2 ?
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-04-07 04:06:30+00:00): Also on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1355085527 and maybe elsewhere
KKK-jp (2026-04-07 06:14:01+00:00): @Mateusz Konieczny 
Thank you for pointing this out.
It was a copy-paste error. I will correct it to height later and also check if I made the same mistake elsewhere.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-04-09 12:37:14+00:00): Thanks for a fix!
Glassman (2025-01-29 03:28:22+00:00): I have reverted this changeset. The name has not been agreed upon by the community. I suggest you read https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/gulf-of-america-gulf-of-mexico/124571/87.
paradx (2025-02-11 09:36:20+00:00): thanks for not following blindly with this stupidity
galen8183 (2025-01-29 03:54:08+00:00): shoot meant to add a comment... updating GRT route 55 to PTv2 and adding missing stops since route was changed 2019-11-02
Glassman (2025-01-29 21:58:51+00:00): They appear to be correctly map as driveways along with access=private which is kind of redundant. I'm going to revert this changeset. Please note that verifiable features can be added to OSM.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161881145
Mashin (2025-03-31 15:22:48+00:00): Hi,
All seems good. The only thing I found is that I am not sure if the high voltage and low voltage lines share this pole: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12540831434
datsjustinc (2025-01-29 04:14:17+00:00): TGI Friday closes its last remaining locations in Connecticut (Orange, Manchester, and Waterbury).
Baloo Uriza (2025-01-29 17:32:12+00:00): Just to be clear, permissive would be "private but the public is generally allowed in", similar to, say, Metrolink's park & ride lots.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161881734
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-02-04 22:51:13+00:00): This changeset deleted a number of roads.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161881811
Viima (2025-02-01 07:25:45+00:00): Добро пожаловать в Openstreetmap. Ваши изменения 161882190 и 161881886 откатились потому что они были злонамеренными или случайными.

Tervetuloa Openstreetmapiin. Kumosin muokkaukset 161882190 ja 161881886, koska tehdyt muutokset eivät vastaavaa todellisuutta maastossa ja näyttäisivät tapahtuneen vahingossa tai kokeilumielessä.
kechan (2025-01-29 16:07:30+00:00): Hello there and congrats on your first OSM edit! 

The building you added was already on the map, so I had to remove it. 

Feel free to add anything you find that is missing from the map!
TrickyFoxy (2025-03-01 22:14:05+00:00): Reverted
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-01-29 16:41:41+00:00): This is not a crossing. crossings are in the road, this is a protected island
Stian Cristian (2025-02-07 09:14:01+00:00): Hello! I am not fixing what you broke.
Please repair you mistake!
HamiDesert (2025-02-11 17:27:28+00:00): Hello,
Thank you for reaching out, I see now that the bus route relation that was present at the intersection before my edit was broken when I updated it into a roundabout. I appreciate you making those updates, have a nice day!
HellMap (2025-01-29 17:35:07+00:00): Lūdzu neliec atkārtotus nosaukumus ēkām, ja šis nosaukums jau ir adresē. Piemēram https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1124074997 un citi. Šis ir īpašuma adresācijas nosaukums, nevis ēkas nosaukums.

Kā arī nemaini adreses - tās izmaiņas tik un tā automātiski visas tiks atceltas.
evdence (2025-01-29 10:02:51+00:00): Sorry that this changeset is this large, I though SC will reduce it into two.
mini-me (2025-01-29 19:52:44+00:00): Прекращайте расставлять выдуманные запреты. Въезд по пропускам или на частную территорию обозначается тегом access=private
mavl (2025-03-07 15:09:45+00:00): @ДмитрийБэ  
Здравствуйте. Ваши последние пакеты правок отменены. Почитайте, пожалуйста, статью об ограничениях.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:access
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-10 16:22:19+00:00): Hello!

You used
healthcare=clinica
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12540987101/history

Have you maybe meant
healthcare=clinic
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?
Lezurex (2025-01-29 14:29:14+00:00): Hallo mottiger,

Klingt doof (ist auch doof), aber der Fussgängerstreifen hier führt tatsächlich ins Nichts (in die Parkplätze). Zwischen der Strasse und dem Fussweg ist eine Wand, der Fussweg verläuft etwas höher.

Könntest du das bitte entsprechend rückgängig machen? Danke :D

LG Lezurex
Lezurex (2025-02-01 17:09:05+00:00): Revertet in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162018823
luiswoo (2025-01-29 15:31:50+00:00): опять же, наименование НП в названии улицы не пишется; наименование улицы пишется без сокращений: переулок Труженников.
rskedgell (2025-02-04 12:12:14+00:00): Please could you explain what the point of splitting a carriageway around a crossing island is, if you do not also map the crossings and traffic calming features.

You have also dragged a cafe several kilometres away into the wrong position.

Please revert.
rskedgell (2025-02-06 10:01:45+00:00): No response to changeset comment, reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162200464
vineelaa (2025-02-06 15:43:12+00:00): Thanks for reverting the edits. Apologies for the delay in the response and will ensure that these are addressed on priority.
We have looked into the changeset and could identify that the mapper has missed on adding the traffic signals and crossing tags while creating the Carriage Way on this segment and she accidently moved the "Cafe" point from one location to another, hence this was a manual miss. We have shared the feedback with the mapper and will ensure that the future edits are inline with the guidelines from OSM community platform.
silversurfer83 (2025-01-29 19:45:18+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap :)

Danke, dass du hilfst die Datenbank aktuell zu halten. Schönes Thema hast du dir zum Einstieg ausgesucht.

Was bei OSM wie erfasst werden kann ist idR in unserem Wiki ganz gut dokumentiert. Zum Thema Hydranten findest du zum Beispiel hier
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:emergency%3Dfire_hydrant
einen guten Einstieg.

Eine Frage hätte ich zu dieser Änderung hier: Das Gebäude, dass du gelöscht hast, was ist mit dem passiert? Auf dem Luftbild von Bing und in der hessischen Liegenschaftskarte ist es noch zu sehen.

Bei Fragen immer raus damit

happy mapping
silversurfer83
Benjamin_ (2025-01-30 11:02:05+00:00): Hallo Silbersurfer,

das Gebäude gibt es noch. Allerdings ist das Alte Gerätehaus in Privaten Besitz und wird als Garage genutzt. 
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
silversurfer83 (2025-01-30 16:11:01+00:00): Danke für die schnelle Antwort :)

Dann hast du ein wenig übereifrig gehandelt, da du das gesamte Gebäude aus der Kartendarstellung entfernt hast. Ich werd das mal wieder richten.

Alle Objekte in OSM haben Eigenschaften (sogen. tags) und so ein Gebäude, wie hier, besteht aus miteinander verbunden Punkten (nodes). Wenn du dir ein Objekt im Editor ansiehst solltest du irgendwo die Möglichkeit haben alle Eigenschaften (tags) zu sehen. Wenn sich nämlich nur einige tags ändern, sollte dafür nicht das ganze Objekt entfernt werden.

Aber alles nicht so dramatisch, lässt sich wieder richten
luiswoo (2025-01-29 15:30:00+00:00): В названии улицы не должно быть названия посёлка. Название улицы пишется без сокращения: Взлётная улица.
Taya_S (2025-01-29 16:14:45+00:00): Full or partial revert of changesets: 161884484, 161884594, 161884861, 161884925, 161884956, 161885075, 161885142, 161885253, 161885276, 161885365, 161885412, 161885552, 161885581

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161904001
Hidoo00 (2025-02-04 20:52:37+00:00): Hej! 
Snubblade över ditt enorma arbete med hastighetsgränser och grävde vidare och hittade den här ändringsuppsättningen. Bör inte många av entréerna taggas med `entrance=staircase` i stället? Main var förvisso fel, men `yes` är väldigt ospecifikt, särskilt när `staircase` finns till just för vanliga trappuppgångar i flerbostadshus. Tankar?
moaxed (2025-02-05 08:08:47+00:00): Hej!
Jag håller med dig. Det finns såklart utrymme att specificera mer noggrant, men kräver ju en hel del arbete. I detta fall ville jag bara korrigera något som var uppenbart fel. Det finns ju även en "lokal konvention" i Stockholm att använda entrance=yes (än så länge). entrance=staircase är nästan inte alls använd förutom i ett område i västerort, men den allmänna konvention skulle ju absolut kunna ändras! Vore ganska enkelt att filtrera på building=apartments och jobba sig igenom stan!
moaxed (2025-02-05 08:12:59+00:00): Annan reflektion:
Så länge det inte finns flera entréer till huset med olika syften (tvättstuga, garage, affär osv) så klarar man sig ju ganska långt, men ja, på de hus där det finns många entréer tycker jag absolut att vi borde börja använda staircase. Men på 99% av husen är det ju egentligen bara trapphusingången som är taggad och då är det ju inte superakut att göra distinktionen.
Hidoo00 (2025-02-05 19:27:54+00:00): Stockholm och alla säregna taggningskonventioner, man blir matt! 😅
Men ja, håller med, det är viktigare (eller viktigt och viktigt, generellt kvittar det så länge trappuppgången är den enda dörren med en adress) att tagga staircase på hus med flera dörrar nära inpå varandra, särskilt om trappuppgångarna är insprängda mellan butiker och annat. Men i t.ex. miljonprogramsområdena torde det vara ett säkert kort att anta att alla entréer som ligger på rad är trappuppgångar, till framtida redigeringar.
Taya_S (2025-01-29 16:14:46+00:00): Full or partial revert of changesets: 161884484, 161884594, 161884861, 161884925, 161884956, 161885075, 161885142, 161885253, 161885276, 161885365, 161885412, 161885552, 161885581

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161904001
Jakka (2025-01-29 08:07:01+00:00): nous ne mettons pas des info pareil.
Classe individuel
j'ai enlever
ilias_ (2025-01-29 15:35:21+00:00): Bonjour, bienvenue sur OpenStreetMap! Merci de vous renseigner sur les différents tags avant de publier vos modifications. J'ai arrangé vos edits.
Jakka (2025-01-29 08:04:17+00:00): Building n'est pas la forme d'un bâtiment. voir message envoyer
SafwatHalaby (2025-04-16 09:51:50+00:00): It looks like you changed the English name to an Arabic name for this node: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/278477170
FroschForscher (2025-01-31 10:39:53+00:00): Hallo JohannaLP, Gratulation zu deinem ersten Changeset. Du hattest um review deiner Änderungen gebeten, dem komme ich hier nach.

1. Die Changsetgröße (Geographisch): ist noch nicht zu groß, hätte man aber auch in zwei Changesets für Günzburg und Gersthofen machen können.
2. Der Name von https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1355113955 klingt sehr nach einer Beschreibung. Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen#name_ist_nur_der_Name
3. Die drei Grundstückszufahrten 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/900340041
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/900340043
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/900340042
wurden ohne für mich ersichtlichen Grund gelöscht bzw. so verschoben das sie die Ludwig-Hermann-Straße Überlappen (wurde auch von osmose so erkannt https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/issue/e129f4f0-da3a-8d26-3347-f5cb5414a3f0 und https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/issue/8873093f-fd7e-aabd-4d84-d60673ff44ff / in iD: Kartendaten > Datenebenen > Osmose Probleme)

FroschForscher
FroschForscher (2025-02-05 14:29:38+00:00): 3. Hab ich jetzt in CS 162163462 korrigiert
WWMapper101 (2025-01-30 21:54:34+00:00): Hi,

Please try to keep changesets local

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
grzegorz75jan (2025-01-29 10:08:09+00:00): +
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161886840
tolio (2025-01-29 08:23:31+00:00): Reverted the name because this shop is from the earliest of the chain, with most obvious name д-р Стефанов name of the  fasade, and there was complaining.
mavl (2025-05-13 15:08:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
mavl (2025-05-13 15:04:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
tolio (2025-01-29 08:36:43+00:00): Reverted the name because this shop is from the earliest of the chain, with most obvious name д-р Стефанов name on the  facade, and there was complaining.
rhhs (2025-01-29 17:29:41+00:00): I've written to them today, let's wait for their answer before making any more changes
m2fc (2025-02-02 14:25:24+00:00): Olá Rafael,
É possível partilhares como obteste a informação que estas antenas têm DIGI?
Junta-te a nós no grupo Cellmapper https://t.me/cellmapperpt para discutir essa questão e ajudar a contribuir.
habi (2025-01-29 08:55:36+00:00): Nein, Notiz https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4605782 erledigt :)
bxl-forever (2025-01-30 13:38:09+00:00): Dear Tommy3009, I think you are damaging the map here.

This node is used by both TEC and De Lijn.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10180708012

You changed network and operator, which had both TEC and De Lijn tags into just TEC… whereas the stop is still attached to De Lijn relations.

Why did  you do that?

Thanks in advance for your reply.
Herwescheluc (2025-01-30 15:19:18+00:00): Hallo, surveyor54,

leider hakt's auch hier: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=8.31362&lat=50.66805&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.95&overlays=role_should_be_outer%2Cways

Grüße aus Herborn

Andreas
surveyor54 (2025-02-12 22:14:26+00:00): Das ist kein Fehler, der Grenzverlauf ist hier so, da kann man nichts ändern. Die Grenzen schneiden sich hier in einem Punkt.
Viele Grüße aus dem MKK
Piskvor (2025-01-29 09:59:36+00:00): Doplněno. 

Co se týká rozdělení cesty na dvě části (z nichž pak jedna část je jednosměrná a druhá ne), zkuste si projít základní návod v editoru, mělo by to být velké tlačítko, něco jako "nápověda - začínáme" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/images/9/96/ID_Editor_Walkthrough.png
adrgru (2025-01-29 11:56:10+00:00): Reverted as major nodes were moved

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161894227
DD1GJ (2025-01-30 05:59:12+00:00): Revert 161889005, verschobene 161888447, OSG Jena
Frank Peng (2026-01-13 07:45:08+00:00): Please don't delete existing valid roads and redraw them anew. Doing so is against OSM good practice. Please just modify the existing roads by adjusting their geometry or changing their tags. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history For the parking aisle you deleted, you could've just retagged it to a service road by removing the service=parking_aisle tag (In the iD editor, at the bottom of the left-hand sidebar of the selected feature underneath "Tags", you can click on the trash can icon to the right of the tag, and it will remove the tag from the selected feature.): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/943071435/history

To retag a road or change a road's classification in iD editor, in the left-hand sidebar of the selected feature, click on the road's current feature type at the top of the sidebar or click on the back button at the top left of the sidebar. Then a list of different feature types will show. 
Click on the "Major Roads" or "Minor Roads" folder, and a list of different road types will appear underneath the folders. You can also click on the search bar at the top of the sidebar and type the road type that you want to change the selected road to. 
Click on the road type that you want to change the selected road to, and it will change the selected road's classification.

You should visit the FacilMap link of this changeset to see which road you deleted and redrew in this changeset: https://facilmap.org/#q=changeset%20161888498
DD1GJ (2025-01-29 11:41:50+00:00): Revert 161890110 161890080 161888923 161888712 wegen verschobener Haltestelle und dadurch entstandenen Konflikten
DD1GJ (2025-01-30 05:56:52+00:00): Revert 161888769, verschobene Straßenlampe und Adtessknoten, OSG Jena
DD1GJ (2025-01-29 20:36:37+00:00): Revert aller Änderungen von GeoInfoOSG2, Jede Menge verschobener Straßenpunkte, gezielte Reverts leider nicht möglich wg. zuvieler Konflikte
adrgru (2025-01-29 11:56:11+00:00): Reverted as major nodes were moved

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161894227
DD1GJ (2025-01-30 05:52:45+00:00): Revert 161889005, verschobene Straße, OSG Jena
DD1GJ (2025-01-29 19:24:35+00:00): Revert 161889295, verschobene Straße, OSG Jena
DD1GJ (2025-01-29 19:22:16+00:00): Revert 161889313, verschobene Straße, OSG Jena
DD1GJ (2025-01-29 19:19:47+00:00): Revert 161889348, verschobene Straße, OSG Jena
Szymson (2025-01-29 17:46:45+00:00): A to od kiedy? Normalnie w okresie Wszystkich Świętych jeździ, w ubiegłym roku również:
https://nadmorski24.pl/images/_original/C3/u2/C3u2T9F720k041I7q2u9s7m6l1M6r7z3.jpg
stasiu512 (2025-01-29 18:13:52+00:00): linia przywrócona, uzupełnie dane w następnych edycjach

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161908838
DD1GJ (2025-01-29 21:25:38+00:00): Revert, verschobene Straße
DD1GJ (2025-01-29 21:24:13+00:00): Revert 161889524, verschobene Straße, OSG Jena
DD1GJ (2025-01-29 11:14:39+00:00): Hallo GeoInfoOSG3, wenn Du nochmal so einen Unsinn einträgst, dann gibt es eine offizielle Beschwerde über das Schulprojekt. Die IP-Adresse lässt sich prima zurückverfolgen.
DD1GJ (2025-01-29 19:06:40+00:00): Revert 161889708, verschobene Straße, OSG Jena
DD1GJ (2025-01-29 21:20:20+00:00): Revert aller Änderungen von GeoInfoOSG4. Zahlreiche verschobene Straßenpunkte, gezielte Reverts zu aufwändig
superkiria (2025-01-29 18:00:45+00:00): Добрый день!
Я так понимаю, дороги там на самом деле никакой нет - уберите её пожалуйста.
Имени у подобных дорог обычно нет.
MKnight (2025-01-31 17:30:44+00:00): Moin,
ich habe einige Deiner "Gebäude" korrigiert oder gelöscht.

Dachbegrünung sollte normal an den Hausumriss mit "roof:material=plants", siehe auch:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:roof:material
Ist nur ein Teil des Daches begrünt, dann sollte "building:part=yes" verwendet werden.
DD1GJ (2025-01-30 06:54:44+00:00): Revert aller Änderungen von GeoInfoOSG7. Zahlreiche verschobene Straßenpunkte, gezielte Reverts zu aufwändig und konfliktanfällig
Allison P (2025-01-29 21:40:02+00:00): This was constructed as a single building, so these subdivisions aren't really appropriate. Furthermore, the angles are not properly aligned.

I suggest mapping the individual shops as areas instead. They can be merged with the addresses to similar effect.
joost schouppe (2025-01-29 10:24:14+00:00): Just to extend on the comment: it's advertised as a "creche", which is care for small children, not as a pre-school as part of the education system (which would make it a kindergarten)