piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
iandees (2026-04-09 23:13:08+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13152804238 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181120542, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
SPalferro (2026-04-09 22:54:34+00:00): * y de barrios
iandees (2026-04-09 23:13:11+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1946733592 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181120544, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
NeisBot (2026-04-09 23:04:22+00:00): Hi istrait, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 98% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 2 highway(s)
- 2 name(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=181120334
istrait (2026-04-10 02:20:57+00:00): Yes, they are intentional.  

Those were trails that the National Park Service has not maintained for going on 20 years. (This comes from a NPS Ranger for the area.)
woodpeck (2026-04-10 08:58:19+00:00): Hi istrait, as a general note we don't delete a trail from OSM just because it is "not maintained" (we don't even delete a trail that is "illegal") - see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F for background on this. In this particular case, I guess that if the trail has not been maintained for 20 years it is likely to be unrecognizable which would make your deletion correct - however if the trail was still recognizable on the ground, then the mere fact of being unmaintained would not be reason for deletion.
ion_chi (2026-04-13 18:02:54+00:00): Hey Modriano,
I added these bike lanes a few months ago in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176676539. I don't see them in any aerials yet, so it's best to wait for that to map them separately. The tags on the road should also be changed to cycleway=separate when bike lanes are mapped separately
NeisBot (2026-04-09 23:56:16+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your changesets and noticed that the cumulative count of your recent edits (4 changesets) shows that 495 of your last 590 changes were deletions. This is quite an unusual proportion, so I wanted to check with you.

Could you please confirm whether these deletions were intentional or if they may have occurred by mistake?

#DeletionsCheck #Cumulative
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?uid=24028924
rarad74 (2026-04-10 03:53:12+00:00): Hi. Based on what info you draved thoise streets? And what is speed limit, lanr nr, surface?
If you dont add all requested tags for the street - this mean low quality work. Other ppl must add what you didnt add here.
lampronessa (2026-04-10 19:52:52+00:00): Hi rarad74, 

These roads were added using recent Vantor Hub imagery from 2026-03-09 where they are clearly visible. Apple has an agreement with Vantor to use their more recent imagery to edit OpenStreetMap, which is not publicly available for editing OpenStreetMap. We only add certain tags if they are verifiable through a citable resource. I am unable to verify the speed limit and surface of these roads, so I did not add the tags.
NeisBot (2026-04-10 01:45:39+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 15 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/855875082 v1 | 6 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/7981021566 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=181122597
lcgytoficial (2026-04-10 01:57:49+00:00): Por favor, alguien puede solucionarlo? Es que yo no se como hacerlo
lcgytoficial (2026-04-10 02:01:30+00:00): Solo queria poner el Casal de Casablanca como punto en el mapa
Umut-K (2026-04-10 01:51:48+00:00): For some reason, I can't get the 3D render to work on f4maps. I am not sure what exactly the issue could be. All seems fine on JOSM Urban Eye. If anyone has ideas, please do share.
eggie (2026-04-10 05:16:47+00:00): Hi.. The update from F4 will take some time.
At least a day or more.
Gr eggie
Umut-K (2026-04-10 05:21:56+00:00): Thank you. I figured it out after fiddling with f4maps. For some reason it needs f4 speciifc buildings to be on for some buildings to appear but not others. Regardless, it seems that issue was not on the OSM design side so it is all right now.
NeisBot (2026-04-10 01:57:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13719838381 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Veterinary clinic"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-04-18 04:33:05+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/181229549
felipeeugenio (2026-04-10 12:43:39+00:00): Hello. That street is totally different now I just realized (bing pictures).
I think you have access to more recent pictures. Do you?
The diagonal exists no more. I remove it.
Anyway... just in case you are mapping with more recent pictures.

regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181122915
LakeLouise (2026-04-13 15:39:11+00:00): Hello, felipeeugenio. I modified the (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1376351942) to curve based on newer Vantor Hub 2026-04-04 imagery which isn’t seen in older Bing Aerial Imagery. If you have newer resources please feel free to adjust the modeling here. Thank you and happy mapping!
felipeeugenio (2026-04-13 15:49:27+00:00): Hello. No, I have not, I am just using ESRI, but I was referring to a diagonal between both "Camino Los Patos" roads in the Biobío crossing. I deleted it.

regards
felipeeugenio (2026-04-13 15:49:49+00:00): bing pictures, sorry
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-10 04:51:52+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

Could you share more context or a source for "Masigat 祖家(今日711卑南東京門市)" as the name of this place=isolated_dwelling feature? The added text appears to include a reference, which looks more like descriptive or promotional information than a stable place name, so a source would help verify whether this is an appropriate name for the feature.

Thanks.
Udarian (2026-04-11 01:23:05+00:00): on the latest imagery in the area (the "Esri World Imagery" these service roads no longer exist, it is a construction site. I am not saying that there aren't roads in the area, I just highly doubt that the alignments would be the exact same as before construction. 

Happy mapping,
Udar.
Nikita Kundelev (2026-04-13 07:04:09+00:00): Hi Udar,
Thanks for flagging this. My edit was based on Bing imagery, but I just checked the latest Esri World Imagery layer and can confirm the area has changed due to construction. I'll update the alignment to match the current state.
Appreciate the sharp eye - happy mapping!
NeisBot (2026-04-10 03:15:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 27 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/947107672 v12 | 14 crossings
https://osm.org/way/947126587 v2 | 13 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=181123976
iandees (2026-04-10 05:20:52+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8767128511 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181126475, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
Scott Muller (2026-04-10 05:28:36+00:00): Thanks for catching that!
NeisBot (2026-04-10 03:42:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 24 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1464549272 v3 | 10 crossings
https://osm.org/way/655531802 v1 | 8 crossings
https://osm.org/way/754730807 v2 | 6 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/6141794196 v3

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=181124495
iandees (2026-04-10 05:20:56+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13434104635 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181126478, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
ion_chi (2026-04-13 18:17:53+00:00): Hey Andrew, Since nearly all solar panels are rectangular in shape, try to square the edges of the ways you're adding. You can use the q hotkey in the iD editor
NeisBot (2026-04-10 03:58:33+00:00): Hello Noel Maleek, welcome to OSM, and thank you for your contributions!

I've taken a look at your recent edits and wanted to discuss a few discrepancies I noticed regarding the surrounding environmental features. Specifically, the locations in your edits don't seem to align with the typical geographical characteristics expected in that area. Here are some (max 10) relevant links to the edits:
https://osm.org/node/13719966909

Could you please take a look?
Looking forward to your response.

#Somewhere
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=181124847
NeisRevert (2026-04-11 12:28:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/181187066
where the comment is: "Remove spam"
rskedgell (2026-04-10 10:21:36+00:00): Adding a kerb node in the middle of a sidewalk is unhelpful and inaccurate. A pedestrian, wheelchair user, or visually impaired user of OSM data for routing would be led to believe that a lowered kerb with tactile paving has to be traversed while following the sidewalk on the north side of Gladstone Street, rather than only when crossing it.

I actually live in London, actively contribute to OSM and use OSM data for real pedestrian routing. I resent having to fix low quality edits made by paid "mappers" like this.

Please either map pedestrian features accurately, or not at all.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13719991865
Nirmala03 (2026-04-13 01:07:00+00:00): Apologies for the mistake I committed. Going forward will take care. Thank you for the valuable feedback.  Thank you.
NeisBot (2026-04-10 05:00:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 31 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/401796758 v8 | 13 crossings
https://osm.org/way/401796769 v5 | 9 crossings
https://osm.org/way/24905163 v28 | 9 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=181125970
Taya_S (2026-04-10 06:13:40+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181128036
ChrissW-R1 (2026-04-11 19:39:16+00:00): Please check https://osm.org/note/5245934
NeisBot (2026-04-10 05:36:53+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13720039769 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Bus tour office"

#MapWithoutSpam
Bienson (2026-04-11 23:12:14+00:00): Hello,

You worsened the building and building part outlines on a lot of areas here. Every outline in this building block was correct before. Compare with iD-Background "NRW Liegenschaftskataster" (official land register). Please fix.
JJ_P (2026-04-13 08:21:23+00:00): Hello! I didn't want to ruin the geometry you made, so I tried to get it back.
Bienson (2026-04-13 23:04:37+00:00): But you still didn't want to use that background layer, and instead just used aerial imagery again? Please fix it correctly.
JJ_P (2026-04-14 11:34:42+00:00): Hello! This layer doesn't load very well for me, but I tried again to bring the nodes back in line with this layer.
dmjab13 (2026-04-13 18:45:05+00:00): in multiple continents?
WalkerB (2026-04-13 19:51:33+00:00): Sorry there were some un-uploaded edits from Greece still hanging in Go Map!
NeisBot (2026-04-10 06:03:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13720076479 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Landscape company office"

#MapWithoutSpam
habi (2026-04-10 06:07:45+00:00): Sorry, hier erstmals die Eingänge erfasst :)
Die Addressdaten kommen in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181127816
Kovoschiz (2026-04-10 10:47:40+00:00): 1. This is not a `=stadium`
2. Avoid semicolon feature tags
rempshaener (2026-04-11 10:10:36+00:00): siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181099741
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-11 13:11:40+00:00): Thanks @rempshaener

Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181181997
NeisBot (2026-04-10 06:18:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13719067631 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Fitness studio"
---
Zum Beispiel könnte eine neutralere und sachlichere Version deines Textes lauten: "Fitness-Studio"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
Kovoschiz (2026-04-10 10:48:10+00:00): Already exists https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12921008
Kovoschiz (2026-04-10 11:05:56+00:00): Already rendered https://tile.openstreetmap.org/17/107120/57208.png
NeisBot (2026-04-10 06:27:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13720114224 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Dental clinic"

#MapWithoutSpam
Kovoschiz (2026-04-10 10:49:38+00:00): Please don't delete directly, as they have addresses, and represent a store space. It wastes effort, and makes tracking and updating difficult.  `disused:amenity=` has already been used. Change it to a plain "Point", or "Vacant".
Bienson (2026-04-11 22:58:14+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181210377 - Reestablish correct name
RaphaelPasloin (2026-04-10 07:55:24+00:00): Hello,

You create duplicate university / college here, look on the relation , this part is already member of : https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19568714

This is clearly a mistake.

Also you already by warned by others mappers to not duplicate address and that address in Brussels are bilingual fr/nl.

As this state you continue adding addess in nl :  it's not a mistake it's vandalism.

Stop immediately that
Thanks in advance.
Raphael
geoTD (2026-04-10 08:10:40+00:00): Hello,

We use OpenStreetMap for our KU Leuven map, and for this, I need to make a number of adjustments to the address or name of a building.

I am not doing this out of vandalism, but out of necessity so that the data matches the KU Leuven records.

My apologies if this comes across the wrong way.
kuhni74 (2026-04-10 11:16:45+00:00): merci!
rarad74 (2026-04-10 07:10:02+00:00): Salut. 1 La mana. te rog sa citesti regulile de editare in Romania. 2. Nu se folosesc abrevieri si prescurtari la nume in Romania pe cat posibil. Se folosesc voci text to speech pentru navigare si suna foarte urat abrevierile.
thetazy (2026-04-10 07:13:00+00:00): Salut, asta este numele oficial, l-am corectat in ideea de a corespunde cu realitatea
rarad74 (2026-04-10 07:43:29+00:00): Din pacate abrevierile nu se folosesc. Oricum trebuia sa modifici si numele strazii la adrese. Acum acele adrese sunt invalide.
O zi buna.
eggie (2026-04-10 07:28:03+00:00): Dag 0011, Wat is je bron voor deze toevoegingen?
Gouwakkerseweg is bv niet bekend bij de BGT/Kadaster (Officieel uitgegeven straatnamen) 
Ga svp na bij de BGT/Kadaster waarom deze naam (nog) niet bekend is.
https://www.verbeterdekaart.nl/#?geometry.x=153532.99&geometry.y=432892.82&zoomlevel=12.06

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-04-10 07:30:36+00:00): Dit geldt ook voor meer straatnamen. Ketelstraat.. zomaar wat steekproeven gedaan.
Wanneer straatnamen zijn teruggetrokken door het Kadaster horen ze hoogstens als old_name=  in OSM thuis.
Kopiëren van andere kaarten is niet toegestaan, maar dat zal wel bekend zijn. 
Graag reactie,
MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-04-10 07:20:30+00:00): Hoi,

Die naam is niet officieel bekend bij de BGT/Kadaster.
Je kunt zoiets doorgeven middels een terugmelding op deze site
https://www.verbeterdekaart.nl/#?geometry.x=152803.22&geometry.y=434652.94&zoomlevel=12.42

Wanneer het alleen lokaal bekend staat dan beter als loc_name =  invoeren.

MVG
eggie
001100N277 (2026-04-17 07:47:19+00:00): er staan straatnaamborden waaruit deze straatnamen blijken. Bovendien komen deze straatnamen op archiefstukken terug en ook op andere kaarten.
eggie (2026-04-17 08:09:14+00:00): Oke, mochten ze niet voorkomen in de data van de overheid (BGT/Kadaster) dan kun je dat het beste doorgeven via bovenstaande link.
Straatnaamborden lijken mij duidelijk. Kopiëren van andere kaarten is echter niet toegestaan.

Mapse,
eggie
Lokai (2026-05-03 05:20:21+00:00): Hallo,

Eine Bemerkung zu name=xyz.
Der Name "Trail", ist doch sehr nahe an der Eigenschaft.

Hier ein link zum wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen#name_ist_nur_der_Name

Bei path ist die Angabe von foot=yes und bicycle=yes nicht nötig.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Germany

Gruß
Lokai (2026-05-06 17:21:59+00:00): Die Anfrage hat sich erledigt. Ein anderer mapper hat den Weg wegen Illegalität gelöscht.
NeisBot (2026-04-10 07:12:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 9 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1497903267 v1 | 8 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/354983163 v5

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=181129781
JhowieNitnek (2026-04-10 07:34:50+00:00): Source: https://databrussels.be/en/id/streetname/5495
Carto'Cité (2026-06-11 14:17:23+00:00): Hello.
I am moving back the tag public_transport=station from the node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5761378122 onto the station perimeter https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/683339741, which is perfectly valid tagging.
Please read the tag 'note' before changing things.
Regards,
Antoine from Carto’Cité for SNCF Transilien
If you had read the note on the node, p
Bovi887 (2026-06-11 16:58:29+00:00): Hi Carto'Cité,
I'm sorry, I've read a lot of these notes like this one, so I'm a bit confused that I've looked over it here. Thanks for restoring it!
Regards,
Bovi887
Carto'Cité (2026-06-11 17:27:08+00:00): No worries, thanks for the reply.
NeisBot (2026-04-10 07:21:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/8496688139 v6

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Dental office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisAgent (2026-04-10 10:33:30+00:00): 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again?
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-01 13:35:01+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags/values

https://osm.org/changeset/184914635
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-01 13:35:34+00:00): *Reverted adding SEO spam description and fixed remaining malformed tags/values