piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
R0bst3r (2024-07-15 05:06:48+00:00): Morgen Metzor,

teilweise. Der Verkehr auf der B29 ist freigegeben.
Aktuell werden aber die Kreuzungen entfernt und Anschlussstellen fertiggestellt.
Aus Essingen kommend gibt's noch eine komplette Umleitung über Stockert, die ich aber nicht erfasst habe, da nur rund 1 Monat gültig.

Was noch fehlt: wie die Durchleitung von Anschluss Esslingen bis Anschluss Kaufland verläuft. Hier wollte ich noch ein GPS aufzeichnen. Solange ist das Routing darüber noch offen.

Allgemein wird die Straße kreuzungsfrei, sollte also dann von Schw. Gmünd bis Oberkochen teilweise hochgestuft werden. 
Viel noch zu klären also bis die Baustelle aufgeräumt ist... Hilfe gerne willkommen.

Grüße R0bst3r
Metzor (2024-07-20 07:34:28+00:00): Hallo R0bst3r,

Danke für deine ausführliche Antwort!
Leider habe ich keine Ortskenntnis und kann daher nur schwer helfen.

Manche erstellen bei großen und längeren Baustellen eine Notiz auf der Karte, um den Status statt in mehreren Änderungssätzen zentral zu dokumentieren. Vielleicht findest du so ja noch Hilfe?

Happy mapping
Metzor
d_berger (2024-07-15 05:38:10+00:00): Baustellen bitte recherchieren: 
https://www.freienbach.ch/freienbach/aktuelles/news/2186110

Eine Neueintragung in der Woche der Fertigstellung ist kontraproduktiv, hab die Strasse daher wieder als befahrbar eingetragen. Grüessli
paulbrunner (2024-07-15 07:09:33+00:00): Alles klar, danke für's Recherchieren und Anpassen.
Happy mapping,
Paul
db-ak (2024-08-05 15:46:29+00:00): Czy na Wańkowicza od Literackiej do Puszkina jest na pewno chodnik z dopuszczonym ruchem rowerowym? Nie ma tam drogi pieszo-rowerowe (nieodseparowane)?
Yog Sot (2024-08-08 20:22:17+00:00): Na wańkowicza jest trochę rowerówek, a trochę tak jak piszesz, tylko w Poznaniu już się nie dopuszcza, tylko zakazuje wyłączając z tego rower.
LockOnGuy (2024-07-14 21:27:01+00:00): Please can you specify the source please?    
Thanks.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-10 16:24:06+00:00): Hello!

You used
content=slurryo
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1097369753/history

Have you maybe meant
content=slurry
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?
puma515 (2025-04-11 18:12:14+00:00): Hello, that was a mistake when editing probably wanted to make the object circular and pressed key o in id for make object round I was probably still in the wrong position and then added an o.

I'll adjust that right away.
puma515 (2025-04-11 18:19:56+00:00): content=slurry fixed in: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164828551
dieterdreist (2024-08-01 16:57:03+00:00): Hi, I noticed you have added amenity=marketplace to the christmas market POI on Piazza Navona. I have removed it because it is not a market usually and was quite misleading.

Cheers 
dieterdreist
SpinOff (2024-07-14 21:24:20+00:00): Tertiary jest za wysoką kategorią w stosunku do Tadeusza Kościuszki. Residential natomiast jest za nisko w stosunku do okolicznych dróg lokalnych, ponieważ Zagmuntowska i Zagłoby zbiera ruch z okolicznych ulic.
Khidistavi (2024-07-15 07:37:01+00:00): Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153958549

Stop vandalize of the region! You were warned against this.
Khidistavi (2024-07-15 07:37:25+00:00): Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153958549

Stop vandalize of the region! You were warned against this.
dieterdreist (2024-07-15 09:18:44+00:00): Hi, I noticed you changed the situation around via Marmorata / Porta San Paolo. Can you explain your sources? I believe this is still wrong now, e.g. in OpenStreetMap one cannot go from the tram station (busses go there as well) in direction of the Tiber river, but it is possible. Also you kept 2 carriageways but there is only one, isn’t it?
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-07-15 11:00:03+00:00): I was only trying to resolve dead-end oneway and other errors. I have no local knowledge of the area. I apologize if I inhibited any cleanup efforts
dieterdreist (2024-07-15 11:28:30+00:00): Thank you for replying, IMHO you should not perform this kind of "fix", because it only hides the real problems. I have now tried to fix most of the problems in the area (as in differences to reality and possible turns and driving directions for psv), but there is still an open case with Via Marmorata, where it might be disputable how many carriageways there are in the initial part (from the city gate down to the fire station). You deleted the central way between the rails without local knowledge, please be more careful (I actually agree it could have been deleted, paying attention to the connection network, but not without local knowledge).
Nico D (2024-07-15 14:26:50+00:00): Hola, gracias por tu aporte!
Te podemos pedir que para tus siguientes cambios utilices una descripción acorde al cambio que estás haciendo?
gracias
ivanbranco (2024-07-17 07:15:37+00:00): Hi chuchupe,

you changed a house to a monument but you give it an invalid wikidata value: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/804083255/history

is it a name? a description? something else?
could you take a look at it?

thanks and good mapping
aixbrick (2024-07-15 05:44:46+00:00): Hallo,
den Hinweis (note) bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/89478849 hast du gelesen? Zumal bereits der Kindergarten die Hausnummer 47a hat.
Gruß
aixbrick (2024-07-22 11:53:50+00:00): Hausnummer wieder auf 47b gesetzt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154259262.
aTarom (2024-07-15 06:32:20+00:00): hola buenos días, no he visto ningún comentario por el foro o lista o grupo de telegram ES, sobre esta importación, es un error todos estos nuevos tags?
> ref:EUS:getxo:cod_via
> ref:EUS:getxo:distrito
> ref:EUS:getxo:id
> ref:EUS:getxo:no_tiene_viviendas
> ref:EUS:getxo:seccion
> ref:EUS:getxo:tipo_via
> ref:EUS:getxo:vivienda_en_lonja

se ha seguido
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
?

no estoy seguro de si la licencia cc3.0 es compatible con la de OSM, podemos discutirlo con la comunidad en el foro o cualquier canal de la comunidad, si ha sido debatido y aprobado no lo encuentro, solo veo la wiki creada ayer y no veo todos los tags nuevos, solo uno.

Pregunto todo ello sobre todo por el tema de licencias que no tengas problemas y para dar por "buenos" o no en siguientes revisiones de tags nuevos

Saludos
Rom1 (2024-07-16 10:30:42+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai corrigé les modifications "collatérales". Quant aux caméras, la position de celles Rue Claude Debussy et Chemin d'Heillecourt est peut-être à revoir car elles sont placées sur la route. Merci et bonne continuation.
Rodrigo Rega (2024-10-10 00:11:59+00:00): He procedido a deshacer este cambio. Por las misma razón que la que se te informó en https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153250668
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153948197
AR_Mapper (2024-07-19 15:28:18+00:00): There is no need to add restrictive access tags when they are incorrect; if a road is narrow the "narrow=yes" tag is appropriate.
ZLima12 (2024-07-14 22:19:23+00:00): I didn't think the Bear Mountain section was as important, so I left it as tertiary. If you disagree with any part of this changeset, please leave a comment here.
Nico D (2024-07-15 14:26:56+00:00): Hola, gracias por tu aporte!
Te podemos pedir que para tus siguientes cambios utilices una descripción acorde al cambio que estás haciendo?
gracias
NieWnen (2026-04-30 19:35:21+00:00): Cześć, 
miałbyś chwilę zerknąć na te ścieżki? 
Np. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1301390202 wygląda na gotowe.
adamsc (2026-05-04 20:36:37+00:00): Otwarte, zmieniłem
NieWnen (2026-05-04 20:38:54+00:00): Dzięki!
NorthCrab_upload (2024-07-14 22:30:19+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.

"Dunikowskiego":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12054023082
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12054023086

"Gojawiczyńskiej":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1232750182

"Kurcewiczówny":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1301390244

"Kordeckiego":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1301390245

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Atlanta502 (2024-07-14 22:44:58+00:00): Poprawione
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153949336
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2024-07-15 12:52:39+00:00): Denturologiste = Denturist
Dentiste = Dentist
Why remove the speciality?
Denturist != Dentist
thetornado76 (2024-07-15 14:56:21+00:00): sorry, I was not aware of this subtlety. isn't healthcare:specialty=implantology then not the better choice?
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2024-07-15 15:05:10+00:00): Honestly I don't know, but in french, the name of the places (Denturologiste) is translated to denturist, so this should be correct to use the speciality=denturist.
thetornado76 (2024-07-15 18:54:52+00:00): If I translate denturist into German, it will be translated the same as dentist, so I assumed that it was entered twice. Then denturist is another specialization of a dentist. Best to enter it in the wiki :-)
thetornado76 (2024-07-15 21:16:37+00:00): could denturist also be about this tag?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:craft%3Ddental_technician
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2024-07-15 21:19:04+00:00): The dental technician would be the person who build the implant. The denturist is the one who will install it in the patient mouth.
MichS (2024-07-16 03:37:35+00:00): Hallo,

bei der Tiefgarage in Kusel wurden die entsprechenden tags für Tiefgarage entfernt, was ist der Grund?

Mit freundlichen Grüßen
VLD549 (2024-07-26 07:34:07+00:00): Hi Camilo,

the source indicated is Bing Maps, for the name change from Sponake to Poolman. I can't seem to find it on Bing, nor on the maps. Could you provide a link of some sort, to confirm the name change?

Thank you in advance!
Camilo Nuñez Castro (2024-07-26 10:05:35+00:00): Hi, the names were obtained as indicated on the SII map (https://www4.sii.cl/mapasui/internet/), no other platform has been used.
VLD549 (2024-08-29 14:19:27+00:00): Hi, thank you for that, but with the link provided I can't find either of the streets. Could you be more specific?

Thank you.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-28 11:53:57+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12054067673/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
Nico D (2024-07-15 14:27:01+00:00): Hola, gracias por tu aporte!
Te podemos pedir que para tus siguientes cambios utilices una descripción acorde al cambio que estás haciendo?
gracias
jeslop (2024-07-15 05:57:19+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153955731
emersonveenstra (2024-07-15 01:15:31+00:00): reverted for vandalism in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153951305
Gazer75 (2024-07-17 20:26:32+00:00): You messed up some voltages and circuit tag on a few line segments. Line between Coventry and Ratcliffe is a 275kV that shares towers with a couple of 400kV lines.

I've already tagged the segments back to correct value.
Gazer75 (2024-07-17 20:31:32+00:00): Looking at more of these changes you've removed the proper voltage tags on several lines that has mixed 400kV and 275kV
Gazer75 (2024-07-17 21:16:32+00:00): I've fixed all the errors I could find around Birmingham. Please don't modify values unless you know what you're doing. Ask previous person if unsure.
kitsee (2024-07-17 23:23:52+00:00): I do apologise, I was rushing and made a bad assumption since I've never seen mixed voltage pylons. In hindsight I'm not sure why I change the voltages, should have tagged the ref and left the rest alone. Thanks for fixing it.
Gazer75 (2024-07-17 23:42:52+00:00): They can happen in some places. For the "ring" around Birmingham it's historical. Several substations used to have 275kV switchgear and as they get upgraded they have to mix. Several substations are still 275kV in Birmingham.
You can see how it all connects on Openinframap
emersonveenstra (2024-07-15 01:15:29+00:00): reverted for vandalism in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153951305
Udarian (2024-07-15 09:19:02+00:00): crossing:signals=no is implied on crossing=uncontrolled and crossing=unmarked so please stop adding them.

Happy mapping 
Udar
emersonveenstra (2024-07-15 01:10:37+00:00): Hi there,

Can you please give sources for these additions?
emersonveenstra (2024-07-15 01:15:20+00:00): reverted for vandalism in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153951305
user_11609320 (2024-07-15 00:37:12+00:00): https://calvert.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites/calvert.house.gov/files/evo-media-document/combined-letters_2.pdf
Fizzie-DWG (2024-07-15 02:59:21+00:00): Reverted by DWG as apparently fictitious features

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153952529
Fizzie-DWG (2024-07-15 03:07:53+00:00): Please also see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16453
jeslop (2024-07-15 14:25:20+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153975250
emersonveenstra (2024-07-15 11:39:50+00:00): Hi there,

For https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/17742515#map=17/44.62758/-86.23925, why did you upgrade the end of Furnace past Bye to be tertiary?
LockOnGuy (2024-07-15 01:42:59+00:00): Stop this self adv./vandalism. I reverted this changeset in CH153951579
LockOnGuy (2024-07-15 01:42:53+00:00): Stop this self adv./vandalism. I reverted this changeset in CH153951579
mvolkhart (2024-08-23 04:06:06+00:00): @dknelson9876 do you know if the other stop near Bryce Canyon Lodge, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/906768051, is still active? I’m not from the area, but looking at the map saw the two stops and got curious. Stop #7 on the shuttle route doesn’t match up with map info from what I can tell.
dknelson9876 (2024-08-23 15:52:46+00:00): I have not recently been to the park either, I did these edits based on the GTFS data published by NPS. Looks like I somehow didn't notice that old node when doing so, and accidentally created a duplicate. I'll merge the duplicate of the one you linked, and check the others as well. But yes, it does look like the stop was also renumbered since it was added it 2017, so I'll fix that too.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2024-07-15 12:50:03+00:00): Shouldn't we add informal paths there so the park is accessible from Rue des Paquerettes? Pedestrian would not make the detour through Moise-Vincent and Julien-Bouthillier to go to the park.
SbGagne (2024-08-06 01:04:11+00:00): I would have left it, but it goes deep into a rain canal drain, not people friendly. The path from Pervenches and Julien-Bouthillier is where the people actually cut through the park.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2024-08-06 01:07:07+00:00): Ok no problem thanks!
damandak (2025-09-08 19:55:32+00:00): Cual es la fuente del nombre Cerro Potrerillos? Saludos
phoenixsaigon1698 (2024-07-15 04:10:41+00:00): Chào Hồng, Cái relation này khi xóa thì xóa đủ mọi thành phần của relation (from via to) để tiến hành xóa hẳn nhé.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-10 01:57:00+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164747836
Anon6119 (2024-07-15 02:48:42+00:00): Oops. It is the section south of sideroad 22 that is paved. This section is not paved.
Khidistavi (2024-07-15 07:37:43+00:00): Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153958549

Stop vandalize of the region! You were warned against this.
Khidistavi (2024-07-15 07:38:12+00:00): Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153958549

Stop vandalize of the region! You were warned against this.
NeisBot (2024-07-15 03:34:38+00:00): Hi Marcosaurus, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1301410024

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-07-16 06:47:46+00:00): Thank you for your mapped brach.
It looks somehow private.
pitscheplatsch (2024-07-15 05:46:52+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153953248
pitscheplatsch (2024-07-15 05:47:24+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153953375
Supaplex (2024-07-15 04:44:26+00:00): 請問汐科町真的存在嗎？汐止東方科學園區是新進的地標，應該不會有日式的街盯名稱。查閱國土測繪中心地圖也並沒有該地址存在
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153953601
Supaplex (2024-07-15 04:46:39+00:00): 留錯了
impiaaa (2024-07-15 17:50:13+00:00): Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing! Names in OSM should always have their abbreviations expanded—see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Abbreviations . I've gone ahead and replace "N" with "North" and "S" with "South."
CurlingMan13 (2024-07-15 22:34:29+00:00): I reviewed this changeset as you requested.  Edit looks good.  Thank you for utilizing access tags and not just deleting the way.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153953991
julcnx (2024-07-19 11:16:09+00:00): Thanks for your contritibutions. Could you please explain the nature of your edits. What Bug Fixes are your referring to ?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153954239
KingKratos (2024-07-22 03:45:46+00:00): If you just look, you will see that I mostly added houses and fixed offset of buildings.
julcnx (2024-07-22 14:12:10+00:00): Well, it's not to easy to look when there are so many changes across multiple continents :)
You will attract less attention if you keep your changesets small and use a description like "added houses and fixed offset of buildings".

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
silversurfer83 (2024-07-15 06:57:14+00:00): Hi :)

when you're closing a highway to motorized traffic like that it would be nice to leave a note or a fixme with the OSM-objects so people can easily discover the reason. The way you did it people need to dig through the edit history and I know that not many mappers do that.

cheers
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153954453
Kookykooky (2024-07-15 07:16:48+00:00): Thanks for the advice, I didn't think of that, I'll do better next time :)
Kookykooky (2024-07-15 07:21:51+00:00): fixed, hopefully ok :)
silversurfer83 (2024-07-15 07:29:50+00:00): That was quick :)

thank you and happy mapping
Metzor (2024-07-15 06:51:36+00:00): Hey goblin,

Thanks for contributing to OSM :-)

Did you delete that way on a parking lot near Liverpool UK on purpose?
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/398801174
(Click "show more")

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/398801174

Imagery does not suggest it should be deleted...

It's a community project. Collaboration is important. It is thus considered polite to answer the changeset discussions :-)

Happy mapping
Metzor
silversurfer83 (2024-07-15 06:54:11+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap :)

thank you for contributing your time to this project.

Couple of questions and notes for your future work here:

- you deleted a greengrocer in the UK. Is this because you know it's gone or what's the reason?

- please do not switch continents while working on the database. Save your work before you move. The reason is explained here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

- nice work with the houses in Australia. To make it extra nice you might wish to learn how to square your buildings. If the building looks like it has right angles in reality you can hit the "Q"-key on your keyboard once you finished adding all desired tags to the object. This will sqare all your angles and leave much nicer buildings :)

in case of questions please reach out. The community can for example be found at c.osm.org and is always eager to help

happy mapping
silversurfer83
Goblin Does Art (2024-07-18 13:50:37+00:00): Ah Sorry! I didn't know there was a comment section, I didn't realise I deleted anything in the UK.  Thank you for letting me know!
Lumikeiju (2024-07-15 05:16:06+00:00): This changeset edited no geometry and made the following tag-only modifications:

Filter: way["building"="apartments"]["addr:housenumber"][!"addr:state"];

Added:
"addr:city=Seattle" | 26 objects
"addr:country=US" | 730 objects
"addr:state" | 731 objects

Removed:
"source:addr:id=*" | 15 objects
"source=*" | 648 objects
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-07-15 06:35:15+00:00): 1) have you verified names on Bing somehow? If no, why Bing is stated as source? If yes  how you did it?

2) Have you discussed this automated edit? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct

Or have you reviewed each of 5741 objects?

3) Have you removed all name=house? Have you taken into consideration that some businesses may be actually named "house"?
adiatmad (2024-07-15 06:51:15+00:00): Hello Mateusz Konieczny, thanks for reaching out. I utilized Overpass Turbo (https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1Od4), loaded the data into JOSM, and added Bing Imagery as basemap.
I frequently find descriptive names and took the initiative to address them. It was my bad for overlooking your third question/consideration. 
Should I contact the DQG for help with reverting this, or do you have another suggestion? Thanks!
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-07-16 05:21:51+00:00): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_(brand) - yeah, this repeatedly trapped fans of such cleanup (and good example why asking on forum before mass edit may be a good idea)

I reverted it now - this is relatively simple for recent edits.
adiatmad (2024-07-16 05:32:24+00:00): Thank you for reverting and explaining the context of the "House" brand name. I'll reach out to the community or work on areas I know best for my next initiative. Thanks again for your help!
marc__marc (2024-07-16 11:40:02+00:00): source is not about the basemap
source is about what media is used as info to make the change.
in this case, the source is just an (wrong) extrapolation that this name is not a name but descriptive
redd (2025-05-07 11:04:27+00:00): Hi there,
what was your intention with setting roof:shape="Not Applicable" and roof:style=flat instead of the common roof:shape=flat?
BartekChom (2025-05-09 05:58:59+00:00): I am sorry. I meant roof:shape=no - no roof, because these parts include only the lower floor. I do not remember why I made this mistake. Thank you for noticing it.
pitscheplatsch (2024-07-15 06:35:49+00:00): Hi, danke für die Ergänzungen.

Sollte der Name der folgenden Node nicht eher "Bonesky" anstatt der URL der Webseite sein?

https://osm.org/node/8348392247
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-06 04:12:19+00:00): Removed SEO spam POI for Two Men in a Truck in Flint with suspicious address that no longer exists at this address or location per their website, if it ever did, in changeset 183721606

https://osm.org/changeset/183721606
NorthCrab_upload (2024-07-15 05:40:25+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12054421124
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1172396059

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀