piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
TrekClimbing (2024-04-04 19:57:12+00:00): Thanks. Local knowledge is fine but ordnance survey may not be - depending on which OS product it is. Many are protected by copyright so we aren't allowed to use them. Some old maps are out of copyright, there's also OS OpenData and OS OpenMap Local, OS Open Names, for example, all of which are fair game, but the current OS 1:25k /1:50k maps are not okay (and many others). Thanks again.
bnj384 (2024-04-04 20:03:00+00:00): Good to know. Thanks
TrekClimbing (2024-04-04 20:41:28+00:00): So the thing is, if it's come from one of those then it needs deleting, unless you can find another suitable source. It gives me no pleasure to say that but it's to avoid OSM getting sued and going bust.
bnj384 (2024-04-05 19:06:13+00:00): Yeah I understand. None of them came from the OS 1:25k /1:50k maps
TrekClimbing (2024-04-06 10:44:42+00:00): Okay, thanks. In general, it would help if you named your sources (more specifically than OS) in your changeset comments to make it clear where the information has come from.

I can see you're making some good additions and improvements but, while I'm here, I'm going to offer some advice on tagging. 

place=locality is for uninhabited places, so some additions (not in this changeset) would have been better with other tags. e.g. Great Pasture (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11739131857) might have been better as a hamlet or neighbourhood? Also, in that case you could have just added the name to the landuse=residential since it seems fairly well defined. 

Some of the 'places' don't seem well-placed (Park Gate https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11462568363) or like they probably aren't places (e.g. Sun Lane https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11470205845 and Farr Royd - aren't they road names?)

highway=path - although appealing because it is non-specific - can be quite misleading for other users unless you also specify whether e.g. motor vehicles, horses, bicycles, can use it. In general it's best to use highway=footway/cycleway/bridleway for 'paths' if you can discern whether they are used by bikes/horses or not.

I'm not sure why you have changed https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1263503384 from track to bridleway as it seems to me like a track used to access the field over the railway line (which also happens to be a public bridleway). If you were marking the difference after access to the building then it should probably be as a service road that far (now I say it, it probably should anyway). And I don't think it was necessary to turn the track around the corner at the junction with Sun Lane. As I see it, Sun Lane carries on and the track (or service road) joins pretty much perpendicular. If you came from the track bit of Sun Lane and turned right onto the track towards the railway line you wouldn't have to turn right back on yourself, you would just turn right.

Sorry for the massive post and I hope you find it helpful. I'm imagining you are going to keep making contributions so I'm trying to help them be as good as they can. Thanks
RicoElectrico (2023-12-28 17:53:31+00:00): I think you can close this note: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4043628
Pieter Vander Vennet (2024-01-09 18:56:45+00:00): Hey, Je voegt hier 'Aliskan Market' toe, op enkele meters van de reeds bestaande çaliskan.

Het lijkt me dat je hier een duplicaat toevoegt. Daarnaast is ook de tagging die je gebruikt foutief: er zitten enkele spaties in je keys die er niet mogen staan.

Tenslotte gaan we (in België) ook zelden de stad en postcode toevoegen, omdat we dit kunnen afleiden uit de locatie.

Tussen haakjes, een paar jaar geleden werkten we - als prototype - een webapp uit waar toegankelijkheidsdata ingevuld kan worden (die dan in OSM komt): https://mapcomplete.org/onwheels?z=18&lat=51.05683890&lon=3.73564373

Op 18 januari doen we een OSM-meetup in de kantoren van Gent (met gratis pizza):
https://www.meetup.com/openstreetmap-belgium/events/297557375/

Indien je interesse hebt, lijkt het me nuttig dat je langskomt en dan kunnen we eens naar je werkwijze kijken.




Daarnaast vermoed ik op basis van je aanpassingen, de hashtag onwheelsapp en mijn eerdere ervaring dat je data van OnWheels aan het importeren bent. (Ja, ook als je de data manueel overzet telt dit als een import).


Indien dit zo is, dan moet je dit eigenlijk bespreken met de community. De chat (https://app.element.io/#/room/#osmbe:matrix.org) en het forum (https://community.openstreetmap.org/) zijn al goede eerste stappen om dit te doen.

Ook de meetup is een uitstekende plaats om kennis te maken en deze flow te bekijken. Ik heb nog een scriptje dat je werk makkelijker kan maken en de data al kan voorbereiden. Als mijn vermoeden klopt, zou ik dus héél sterk aanraden om naar de meetup te komen.
Indien de meetup niet lukt: zelf woon ik in Gent, vlakbij Gent-Dampoort; we kunnen daar ook eens afspreken en de lopende zaken bespreken met een tas thee en een koekje.

Mvg,
Pieter
pietervdvn@posteo.net
Kovoschiz (2023-12-29 09:52:27+00:00): As I said, please don't use the project title as a descriptor label on `name=` . That's for proper names only. Furthermore, this is the `landuse=residential` of the entire estate.
Langlaeufer (2023-12-28 13:53:25+00:00): Hallo Gerd,
das ist doch kein reiner Radweg, oder doch?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145616816
Gerd Fahrenhorst (2023-12-28 13:57:45+00:00): nee stimmt sollte man das besser als fußweg deklarieren?
Gerd Fahrenhorst (2023-12-28 13:58:23+00:00): ach hast du wohl schon geändert, danke
silversurfer83 (2023-12-28 20:59:39+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OSM :)

schön, dass du hilfst die Karte zu verbessern.

Diese Kommentare in der sogenannten Änderungssatzdiskussion sind der übliche Weg um sich bei OSM über Details der Änderung auszutauschen. Und da ich eine Frage dazu habe, bekommst du hier die Begrüßung und die Frage:

Bist du dir bei dieser Teich sicher, dass da ein Teich ist? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1234887032
Auf keinem Luftbild ist dort eine so große Wasserfläche erkennbar.

Grüße nach Haiger
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145616899
Stefan-Haiger (2023-12-29 08:21:28+00:00): ja, ich wohne dort in der Nähe. Der Teich ist von vielen Bäumen verdeckt aber relativ groß. Kann ich hier irgendwie ein Bild dazu hochladen, würde das helfen ?
silversurfer83 (2023-12-29 08:47:59+00:00): Moin Stefan :)

Danke für die schnelle Reaktion. Mittlerweile hab ich es auch geschafft mir mal die Liegenschaftskarte anzusehen und die bestätigt das auch. Wenn du als Ortskundiger das so einträgst ist das auch OK, da Vor-Ort-Wissen sowieso das Beste ist, was wir bei OSM haben 👍🏻

OSM selbst hat keine Infrastruktur um Bilder zu Objekten abzulegen. Es gibt jedoch mehrere etablierte Möglichkeiten Bilder zu verlinken. Bild bei Hoster deiner Wahl ablegen und den Link dazu beim Objekt ablegen. Fertig.
Oder über die wikimedia commons.

Bei Fragen immer raus damit und auch einfach mal durch unser Wiki (wiki.openstreetmap.org) scrollen.

Grüße
Silversurfer83
woodpeck_repair (2024-06-15 22:29:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 152740214, 152740288, 152740274, 152740234, 152740192, 152740169, 152740167, 152740249, 152740178 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions by Hamilton 44/Delta Evas ALL, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16207
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-12-28 21:58:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145638630 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some vandalism in Ukraine.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15525 .
mueschel (2023-12-31 10:54:34+00:00): Hi,
please review the entrance tags you added recently, there are a few tagging mistakes:

- the decimal separator is a dot, not a comma. i.e. "1.3 m", not "1,3 m"
- there should be no spaces in the keys, e.g. not "entrance width" but "entrance:width"
- some tags have strange values like "step count = /"
- sometimes values don't make sense. There are entrances with 2 steps of 0 cm each.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-12-28 21:58:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145638630 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some vandalism in Ukraine.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15525 .
woodpeck_repair (2024-06-15 22:29:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 152740214, 152740288, 152740274, 152740234, 152740192, 152740169, 152740167, 152740249, 152740178 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions by Hamilton 44/Delta Evas ALL, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16207
VLD549 (2024-01-26 18:42:01+00:00): Hi, isn't this called Torenstee now?

In the source that you provide:
Hoeve "Torenstee", voorheen: "Bouw- en Veelust".

Thank you.
Flakkeeënaar (2024-01-26 19:56:47+00:00): Hello,
That’s right, strange that I mapped it this way while the source clearly states ‘Bouw en Veelust’ as the former name.
I will make the change accordingly
Regards
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-12-28 23:54:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145640994 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some vandalism in Ukraine.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15529 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-12-28 23:54:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145640994 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some vandalism in Ukraine.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15529 .
woodpeck_repair (2024-06-15 22:29:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 152740214, 152740288, 152740274, 152740234, 152740192, 152740169, 152740167, 152740249, 152740178 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions by Hamilton 44/Delta Evas ALL, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16207
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-12-28 21:58:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145638630 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some vandalism in Ukraine.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15525 .
silversurfer83 (2023-12-28 17:40:55+00:00): Danke :)

fehlt mir nur noch eine letzte Information von dir: Was genau "isSchimmelBlack" und "schimmel=true" genau sagen sollen

prost
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145618287
Frans S (2023-12-28 13:23:59+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Very inaccurate mapped. Buildings not squared.
nodes of buildings connected to other buildings
Misplaced buidings are not corrected to their footprint.
The worst mapped buildings have been removed.
Cost more time to correct rather than map them again.

Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145618557
Frans S (2023-12-28 13:26:40+00:00): Hi. Another issue
Please do not map clusters of buildings as 1 building.
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145618557
flohoff (2024-01-27 13:32:20+00:00): Moin,
Welcome to OSM und cool das du mit mappst.

Mir ist der hier aufgefallen weil da auf dem Dreiecksweg ein "access=destination" ist - D.h. "Anlieger frei" allerdings ohne das Schild. Also gilt das so auch gerade für Fußgänger, was man nach StVO ja gar nicht Beschildern kann.

Ich vermute du kennst dich da aus.
Was steht denn da? Ein Zeichen 250 oder 260?

Also "Fahrzeuge aller art" oder "Kraftfahrtzeuge aller art"?

Ansonsten - es gibt für OSM OWL eine kleine Mailingliste wo man auch mal fragen loswerden kann:

https://gt.owl.de/mailman/listinfo/osm

Keep going

Flo
garodan (2024-01-27 16:36:15+00:00): Hallo Flo,
Vielen Dank für den Hinweis auf die Mailingliste. An der Straße steht ein Zeichen 250 mit dem Zusatz "Fahrräder und Anlieger frei".
Viele Grüße
Johannes
NorthCrab_upload (2023-12-28 13:10:54+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Józefa Poniatowskiego":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11462704508
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11462704514
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11462704516
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11462704518

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eggie (2023-12-28 15:18:21+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback... Gebouwen zijn een van de winige dingen die we zelf intekenen. Je kunt om een import vragen via het forum in het draadje BAG importverzoeken. Dan komen de juiste gegevens .. adresnodes ook mee.
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/nl/43

Feedback 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
rhtb0 (2023-12-29 12:30:25+00:00): Hello Samikshya Ghimire

Also, please do use meaningful changeset comments - “contributions” does not help other mappers understand what you are doing.
MxxCon (2024-01-02 00:40:02+00:00): Hello.
You tagged this road segment as having 4 lanes, but looking at the satellite imagery, it seems to be 5 or 6, depending on the spot. Is that not correct?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145619378
John Gilmore (2024-01-02 02:40:43+00:00): I think you're talking about York Ave between 60th and 61st.  (Multiple roads were edited in that changeset.)  I would have to go back to re-survey.   I can see (in the iD editor) the Bing sat imagery but it does not give sufficient clarity to let me say how many lanes there are in each direction at each end of that block of York Ave (at 60th to 61st).  Note that turn lanes are not counted, but some turn arrows may be obscured by cars or trucks in the image.  Also see how the double yellow line in the sat imagery drifts to the right mid-block, with the stop bar in the northbound lane at 61st being only 2 lanes wide.  In short, there's no substitute for actually being there, so I will defer trying to update this until I am (or some other editor is) actually at the spot again.
MxxCon (2024-01-02 02:52:30+00:00): Yes, I was referring to York Ave. Bing imagery might not be the latest in that spot. around NYC Esri have been a bit newer, although I hear Bing should update theirs soon.
You can also use Bing street imagery but it's from 2021, I don't know if the situation there changed since.
John Gilmore (2024-01-29 04:08:56+00:00): I re-surveyed the area in person two weeks ago, and entered another note with my findings:  https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4066662  Today I checked that note against the OSM database and it appears that the database is accurate (there are 4 lanes marked on York Ave in each block between 60th and 63rd).  So this discussion should be closed.  (I don't know how to do that.)
grzegorz75jan (2025-05-25 21:59:05+00:00): Uważasz, że woda płynie do góry ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1234894534#map=17/49.970889/20.660009&layers=N

Przy okazji polecam po drodze drogi polne i parę innych obiektów bo moją uwagę już zdobyły.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145619415
Pawelski44 (2025-06-02 18:34:01+00:00): https://mapymalopolski.pl/app/mapa/miip/f12b809d-68f6-791b-2325-feeeb2f4c4ef/?locale=pl&mapview=49.972801%2C20.668279%2C7929.16s

Płynie na północ do Uszwicy.
grzegorz75jan (2025-06-19 01:10:25+00:00): Ten człowiek edytuje bez czytania Wiki oraz ma w głębokim poważaniu wszelkie napomnienia. Informacje w poprzednich komentarzach do wielu zmian oraz w tej bezpośrednio. Bród nie jest brodem. Ciek wodny nie płynie pod górkę oraz nie pokrywa się w terenie z linią drogi.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167804076
grzegorz75jan (2025-06-19 01:17:33+00:00): Korekta komentarza.
Byłeś informowany o błędzie cieku wodnego.
Ciek wodny nie płynie pod górkę wzdłuż Krakowskiej w stronę Brzeska. Nie przecina się bezpośrednio z drogą bo tam jest przepust. Błędna geometria.

Jeżeli masz gdzieś uwagi i wolisz tworzyć kolejne kleksy lasów zamiast poprawić i dostosować się to możesz odwołać się do Sztrasburgera jeżeli masz argumenty.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145619415
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-12-28 21:58:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145638630 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some vandalism in Ukraine.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15525 .
angys (2023-12-29 06:36:48+00:00): Please explain why you map a big TT area?
citrula (2023-12-28 16:23:48+00:00): Thanks for your contribution and welcome to OSM! A few things: addr:state=* tag should use the abbreviation for the state (Texas->TX) , and the phone should be in the format '+1 nxx nxx nxxx' , with no parentheses. Happy mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145620010
AwFi (2025-08-03 15:54:52+00:00): Ciao, ho visto ora che hai aggiunto tutti questi torrenti, però la gran parte presenta sovrapposizioni con strade e ferrovie, riusciresti a controllare per favore?
Buon Mapping!
AwFi
granpasso811 (2025-08-03 17:47:03+00:00): Ciao,
sì ho aggiunto qualche centinaio di km2 di reticolo idrografico dove prima non c'era praticamente nulla. Ci ho messo qualche mese. Penso di aver dato un bel contributo, ora mano a mano gli utenti locali possono completare e correggere dove serve. Buon mapping anche a te.
trial (2024-01-01 09:32:08+00:00): Bonjour et bonne année, la borne électrique est positionnée de telle manière que seuls ceux qui viennent depuis le C 618 peuvent l'utiliser. Soit environ 0,0001% du trafic ;-), TotalEnergies fait certes des conneries, mais quand il sagit de se faire de l'argent, ils ne semblent pas si stupides.
Gseb29 (2024-01-02 18:20:03+00:00): Bonjour et bonne année, les bornes sont bien accessibles depuis la station service. Je viens de retirer le caractère `sens unique` de la voie qui passe.
Cordialement.
trial (2024-01-02 19:26:11+00:00): Non, il est bien impossible de sortir par là, sauf s'ils ont (encore) changé le plan de circulation. avant c'était à double sens puis en sens entrée uniquement. Au besoin couper ce segment en deux.
user_1566574 (2024-07-12 17:17:57+00:00): Chapeau en tous cas : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/694060948/history

Votre contribution à l'aveugle sans lire les attributs a amené une personne a supprimer les chemins, et une autre à les rajouter : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153861127

Il serait peut-être temps de se former sur le Wiki : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/
ajulien (2024-07-12 20:33:41+00:00): Alors déjà, merci d'utiliser un autre ton, je suis ni votre enfant, ni votre obligé de quelques manières que ce soit.

J'ai bien vu le commentaire lorsque j'ai fait mon édition. Et ça n’a aucun sens, d’où mon édition.

Je ne sais pas qui est ce La Rue, mais il fait clairement des éditions abusives. Prenez-vous-en à lui plutôt. Peut-être un concurrent qui cherche à nuire au commerce desservit par ce chemin ? Peut-être veut-il éviter que des personnes qui ne sont pas des clients utilisent son parking ? Peu importe, sa demande n'est pas motivée, et pas légitime.

J’habite le quartier, il existe bel et bien un chemin qui traverse de la place Saint Marcel à la route de la Digue. L'entrée est clairement indiquée par plusieurs panneaux des deux côtés, sans restriction d'accès indiquée, mais avec un portail fermé en dehors des horaires d'ouverture du magasin.

Je n'ai pas connaissance d'une page dans le wiki qui nous oblige à respecter la demande d'un propriétaire, surtout quand il n'est pas vérifié comme tel dans le cas présent.

Par contre, il y a une page wiki qui indique: "Ne censurez rien de ce qui existe dans la réalité *pour quelque raison que ce soit*. Évitez les interpolations s'il y a suffisamment d'images."

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#Mappez_ce_qui_se_trouve_sur_le_terrain

Voilà. Bonne soirée.
eggie (2023-12-28 21:21:51+00:00): Dag David.. Waareom zou dit pad een eerichtingsfietspad zijn?
Je kunt smoothnesstag toevoegen bv 
smoothnes = bad of very_bad
surface ground en de smoothnestag kan dan de router z'n werk laten doen.
(onverhard vermijden instellen) 
Hoe zit het met de eenrichting? 
Welk bord staat hier? 

avoid ken ik niet als OSM tag  wel discourage

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-12-28 21:27:52+00:00): smoothness bad toegevoegd en oneway=yes verwijderd. Volgens mij geen eenrichtingsverkeer.
Kijk je nog naar dat avoid..  Dat geldt wellicht voor jou, maar er zijn toch ook mtb ers die er wel kunnen fietsen. 

MVG
eggie
woodpeck_repair (2024-02-14 19:31:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 147464049, 147464044, 147464035, 147464024 where the changeset comment is: revert von Edits, die auf noch nicht für OSM freigegebenen Daten der Landesvermessung RLP beruhen
limes11 (2024-12-01 15:26:14+00:00): Hi

you changed the max speed from 70 to 50 while there still is 50 @ wet. This does not make sense. Also, there is a note here claiming 70 was correct.

Do you know what's correct here ?

Cheers
sheldonelectric (2024-12-01 17:06:30+00:00): hi, it must have been some mistake in my notes, i reverted my changeset.
mcliquid (2023-12-28 17:38:39+00:00): Hey there,

I have a cool tip for you: keep your changesets local.

Trust me, it will save you a lot of trouble and make your reviewers happy. Here’s what you need to do:

• stick to one area at a time (like a city, a district or a province)

• don’t cross the border (unless you have a passport)

• upload/save your changes before you hop to another place

Why? Because size matters when it comes to changesets. Don’t believe me? Check out this wiki page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for listening, have a wonderful day and enjoy mapping!
user_19737901 (2023-12-30 13:20:12+00:00): Ist der Rastplatz noch im Bau? Sende mir am besten Fotos! Danke.
user_390227 (2023-12-30 14:25:57+00:00): Mit dem Bau der Rastanlage wurde bis heute nicht begonnen. Hier befindet sich zur Zeit nur eine Wiesenfläche. Warum man die Rastanlage in Änderungssatz https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144846022 als "fertig" kartiert hat ist mir ungegreiflich.
Sowas kommt nur, wenn man ohne Ortskenntnis einfach blind drauf los kartiert.....
MarcoR (2023-12-30 09:59:11+00:00): Ciao e benvenuti su OpenStreetMap!

Ho migliorato la mappatura dell'edificio del bed & breakfast  ma ho lasciato il nodo "Villa Marinella" sulla costa vicino a "Viale Cristoforo Colombo" perché non capisco cosa rappresenti.

Faccio notare che "Via Castiglione" attualmente non è presente su OpenStreetMap e questa potrebbe essere l'occasione giusta per aggiungerla (se non si è sicuri dove inizia o finisce basta cambiare il nome della strada nel punto in cui si sa con certezza che è "Via Castiglione").

Buon mapping (e anno nuovo),
Marco.
wolfbert (2025-06-30 20:54:19+00:00): Hallo, worauf beruht maxspeed=10 für die gesamte Fußgängerzone? Normalerweise gilt Schrittgeschwindigkeit (also kein maxspeed nötig).
stp_mob (2025-07-03 07:12:21+00:00): War vor allem wegen Konsistenz im Routing (manche Wege hatten bereits maxspeed 10), aber jetzt korrigiert bzw. maxspeed entfernt.