piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-20 04:46:26+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with malformed tags that doesn't actually exist on the ground (AnchorBooks is an online listing service for boat owners and operators), in changeset 184339059

https://osm.org/changeset/184339059
sannkc (2026-06-21 01:18:25+00:00): Reverted in changeset #184372787
yelisey90 (2026-06-17 19:46:13+00:00): partly rv — there's fence there, not gate, so no road

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184242972
sannkc (2026-06-21 01:11:40+00:00): Reverted in changeset #184372715
PizzaTreeIsland (2026-06-17 16:06:57+00:00): Hello and thank you for adding all those camping grounds!
Please note that the correct tag for dog is dog, not dogs. I fixed this everywhere!

Thanks and happy mapping!
Peter_v_Aalst (2026-06-17 17:55:45+00:00): Thank you for pointing this out, and thank you for fixing my mistake.

Happy mapping,
Peter
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-20 04:46:54+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with malformed tags that doesn't actually exist on the ground (AnchorBooks is an online listing service for boat owners and operators), in changeset 184339068

https://osm.org/changeset/184339068
sannkc (2026-06-21 01:09:04+00:00): Reverted in changeset #184372687
sannkc (2026-06-21 01:04:39+00:00): Reverted in changeset #184372645
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-20 04:47:24+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with malformed tags that doesn't actually exist on the ground (AnchorBooks is an online listing service for boat owners and operators), in changeset 184339073

https://osm.org/changeset/184339073
sannkc (2026-06-21 01:01:53+00:00): Reverted in changeset #184372603
sannkc (2026-06-21 00:58:08+00:00): Reverted in changeset #184372543
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-20 04:47:50+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with malformed tags that doesn't actually exist on the ground (AnchorBooks is an online listing service for boat owners and operators), in changeset 184339083

https://osm.org/changeset/184339083
sannkc (2026-06-21 00:53:06+00:00): Appears to have been reverted or mostly reverted in changeset #184251692
sannkc (2026-06-21 00:49:31+00:00): Appears to have been reverted or mostly reverted in changeset #184251692
sannkc (2026-06-21 00:47:02+00:00): Appears to have been reverted or mostly reverted in changeset #184251692
sannkc (2026-06-21 00:46:08+00:00): Appears to have been reverted or mostly reverted in changeset #184251692
sannkc (2026-06-21 00:44:58+00:00): Appears to have been reverted or mostly reverted in changeset #184251692
sannkc (2026-06-21 00:40:44+00:00): Appears to have been reverted or mostly reverted in changeset #184251692
BCNorwich (2026-06-17 17:17:40+00:00): Hi, Regarding the four highways you've tagged as abandoned:highway=path. These paths are not abandoned; they remain PRoW. Your information source page pertains to a proposed extinguishment and creation. Untill and if the Highway Authority actually makes any such order they are publicly accessible on foot, even if obstructed. I refer you to the Cambridgeshire rights of way map:- https://maps.cambridgeshire.gov.uk/?tab=2

Regards Bernard.
Steve Trumpton (2026-06-17 18:27:36+00:00): Thanks Bernard - I understand what you mean.  At the moment, they have razed the ground and put a fence around the area, so from what you are saying, this is a temporary closure - I'll mark it as such and re-submit.
BCNorwich (2026-06-18 05:50:10+00:00): Hello Steve,
I've looked into this a bit further.
Apparently a temporary permissive bridleway has been created, (lasting until 2030), as an alternative to the extinguished paths).

The route of the temporary permissive bridleway is shown here (3rd map down):- https://www.stneots-tc.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/115/2025/08/planning-committee-agenda-2025-08-12-Website-Supporting-Docs.pdf   

The final route of the proposed bridleway is shown here (yellow line):- https://www.huntsramblers.org.uk/images/106_Footpaths/St_Neots/BM12427-052%202%20Jan%2025.pdf

So it seems the temporary path should now be available.

Regards Bernard.
Steve Trumpton (2026-06-18 09:17:02+00:00): Thanks Bernard.  There is a temporary path that is partially accessible.  I'll walk it with the GPS and upload shortly.
sannkc (2026-06-21 00:38:58+00:00): Appears to have been reverted or mostly reverted in changeset #184251692
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-20 04:48:26+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with malformed tags that doesn't actually exist on the ground (AnchorBooks is an online listing service for boat owners and operators), in changeset 184339092

https://osm.org/changeset/184339092
felipeeugenio (2026-06-17 16:24:05+00:00): Hola. El Cesfam ya estaba dibujado. Esto que modificó es el edificio. Que están considerados aparte. Deshice esa parte de la edición. Además un Cesfam no es un hospital.

Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184232999
felipeeugenio (2026-06-17 16:24:25+00:00): Borró tres canchas además. Ya no existen? o se trató de un error?

Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184232999
ppalma (2026-06-17 16:33:36+00:00): Hola, entiendo la aclaración del Cesfam, gracias

En ese lugar había canchas sintéticas, las cuales vendieron y demolieron, hace pocos meses, por la información que manejo construirán un supermercado allí. Saludos
felipeeugenio (2026-06-17 18:52:22+00:00): Hola. Gracias por la aclaración. Saludos
sannkc (2026-06-21 00:38:00+00:00): Appears to have been reverted or mostly reverted in changeset #184251692
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-20 04:48:55+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with malformed tags that doesn't actually exist on the ground (AnchorBooks is an online listing service for boat owners and operators), in changeset 184339098

https://osm.org/changeset/184339098
coatix (2026-06-24 18:40:03+00:00): Hier stimmt was mit den Tags nicht. Bitte nochmal überprüfen :)
Erich 106 (2026-06-24 20:00:08+00:00): Durch den Autobahnbau wurde der Zustieg von der Bäuerinnenkapelle zur Burschlwand bzw. zum E5 unmöglich und über die Kiesgrube östlich von Zams umgeleitet (der neue Anstieg wurde von mir bereits eingezeichnet). Der Abstieg von oben kommend wurde durch einen Holzstamm versperrt und einem "Gesperrt-Hinweis" markiert.
coatix (2026-06-25 04:08:26+00:00): Ich meinte das hier technisch was falsch eingetragen ist, nicht inhaltlich :)
sannkc (2026-06-21 00:36:03+00:00): Appears to have been reverted or mostly reverted in changeset #184251692
sannkc (2026-06-21 00:34:10+00:00): Appears to have been reverted or mostly reverted in changeset #184251692
sannkc (2026-06-21 00:32:43+00:00): Appears to have been reverted or mostly reverted in changeset #184251692
dzidek23 (2026-06-18 14:28:08+00:00): Hi Emetas,

Great job and fine contribution but just one thing to look at.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1530393136
Because navigation does not allow for jumping from path to path (be it a street or a path) this looks great but isn't actually useful. 
So if you can, add junctions to the nearby streets, join with other paths on the other side of the road and then it will work much better.

Anyways, well done and keep up the good work.
sannkc (2026-06-21 00:31:22+00:00): Appears to have been reverted or mostly reverted in changeset #184251692
sannkc (2026-06-21 00:29:03+00:00): Appears to have been reverted or mostly reverted in changeset #184251692
eggie (2026-06-17 17:20:54+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback   Het is helaas niet de bedoeling om de adresnode heel ergens anders te zetten.
Je kunt wel bv een pad naar de voordeur intekenen. Ik heb de adresnode rechtonder op het gebouw geplaatst.
Bij een zoekslag kom je daar dan echt uit.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
sannkc (2026-06-21 00:27:22+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset #184372122
sannkc (2026-06-21 00:20:57+00:00): Appears to have been reverted or mostly reverted in changeset #184251692
sannkc (2026-06-21 00:19:21+00:00): Appears to have been reverted or mostly reverted in changeset #184251692
sannkc (2026-06-21 00:16:21+00:00): Appears to have been reverted or mostly reverted in changeset #184251692
Sammyhawkrad (2026-06-18 07:59:01+00:00): Hi Mensah Silas, welcome to OSM. Please take a critical look before you upload/save what you map. I doubt you'd find a building in the middle of the road.
sannkc (2026-06-21 00:14:15+00:00): Appears to have been reverted or mostly reverted in changeset #184251692
sannkc (2026-06-21 00:12:28+00:00): Appears to have been reverted or mostly reverted in changeset #184251692
0000FF berries (2026-06-17 18:01:18+00:00): Hi there :) Thanks for mapping Greece on OpenStreetMap :) 

I'm one of the local volunteers and I'm writing to you because the restaurant which was added with your recent changes (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13948061401) is already mapped at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4382621672. In order to improve the mapping, I copied some of your tags to the older entry and will "merge" the two entries, leaving just one.

Thank you again for mapping and if I can help with anything, let me know :)
sannkc (2026-06-21 00:10:47+00:00): Appears to have been reverted or mostly reverted in changeset #184251692
Sammyhawkrad (2026-06-18 08:02:40+00:00): Hi BinkalB, building=1 is not a valid tag. Use building=yes
sannkc (2026-06-21 00:09:55+00:00): Appears to have been reverted or mostly reverted in changeset #184251692
sannkc (2026-06-21 00:07:48+00:00): Appears to have been reverted or mostly reverted in changeset #184251692
sannkc (2026-06-21 00:06:14+00:00): Appears to have been reverted or mostly reverted in changeset #184251692
map per (2026-07-04 22:27:22+00:00): Hallo Derkoenig,

du hast hier die Fürstenrieder Straße so bearbeitet, dass Autos nicht mehr von Süden nach Norden über die Brücke an der A96 fahren können. Stimmt das wirklich so? Ich war schon länger nicht mehr dort, aber bisher wurden die Autospuren immer nur verlegt und nicht komplett gesperrt.

Viele Grüße
map per
sannkc (2026-06-20 23:42:15+00:00): Reverted in changeset #184371473
sannkc (2026-06-20 23:36:08+00:00): Appears to have been reverted or mostly reverted in changeset #184251692
sannkc (2026-06-20 23:34:23+00:00): Appears to have been reverted or mostly reverted in changeset #184251692
sannkc (2026-06-20 23:32:44+00:00): Appears to have been reverted or mostly reverted in changeset #184251692
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-17 22:06:19+00:00): Reverted adding SEO POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags, likely sourced from Google Maps, in changeset 184247095

https://osm.org/changeset/184247095
sannkc (2026-06-20 23:30:33+00:00): Appears to have been reverted or mostly reverted in changeset #184251692
sannkc (2026-06-21 04:05:45+00:00): Appears to have been reverted or mostly reverted in changeset #184251274
isotopicemoting (2026-06-18 20:30:27+00:00): Hey, I noticed that the key "recycling:text" on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12291410154 looks like a typo. I'm guessing you meant "recycling:textiles" but didn't want to just change it because I'm not sure.
lyctkel (2026-06-18 20:36:35+00:00): Hi isotopicemoting,
thanks for the hint.
You are right.
Fixed.
Greetings,
lyctkel
sannkc (2026-06-21 04:04:35+00:00): Appears to have been reverted or mostly reverted in changeset #184251692
sannkc (2026-06-21 04:02:32+00:00): Appears to have been reverted or mostly reverted in changeset #184251373
Sammyhawkrad (2026-06-18 08:16:37+00:00): Hi monsoonheat, welcome to OSM. Roads shouldn't cross buildings, so avoid that when mapping. JOSM will always show that as a warning, so fix them before you upload.
pesec (2026-06-18 11:11:25+00:00): Здравствуйте.
На кадастре города отсутствует микрорайон с таким названием.
От куда у вас данные о границах и названии?
NasuFoito (2026-06-18 13:12:42+00:00): Здравствуйте, не все районы есть в кадастровой карте))
Уже был микрорайон в точке https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12481578325 добавлены только границы
NasuFoito (2026-06-18 13:13:26+00:00): + информация об этом микрорайоне от местного жителя через поисковый запрос и координаты
NasuFoito (2026-06-18 13:19:54+00:00): https://tyumn.ru/raiony/rajon-lesobaza-v-tyumeni
https://tumen.ginfo.ru/ulicy/?okrug=41&rayon=493
greatnameguys2472 (2026-06-18 02:32:14+00:00): Reverted per DWG Advice
Glassman (2026-06-18 21:46:33+00:00): #TIP: square bldgs by selecting the outline then just type a "q"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184235524
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-02 07:04:01+00:00): Cleaned up remaining SEO spam and other mistagging for POI

https://osm.org/changeset/184957636
greatnameguys2472 (2026-06-18 02:31:40+00:00): Reverted per DWG Advice
greatnameguys2472 (2026-06-18 02:31:25+00:00): Reverted per DWG Advice
greatnameguys2472 (2026-06-18 02:30:00+00:00): Reverted per DWG Advice
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-02 07:04:22+00:00): Cleaned up remaining SEO spam and other mistagging for POI

https://osm.org/changeset/184957636
greatnameguys2472 (2026-06-18 02:26:19+00:00): Reverted per DWG Advice
greatnameguys2472 (2026-06-18 02:24:48+00:00): Reverted per DWG Advice
greatnameguys2472 (2026-06-18 02:24:33+00:00): Reverted per DWG Advice
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-02 07:04:33+00:00): Cleaned up remaining SEO spam and other mistagging for POI

https://osm.org/changeset/184957636
Fizzie-DWG (2026-06-18 01:34:14+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20844
greatnameguys2472 (2026-06-18 02:23:49+00:00): Reverted per DWG Advice
pwbriggs (2026-06-17 18:56:26+00:00): The phone number format in the US should be +1-206-323-1675, not +1 (206) 323-1675. Thanks!
Patr1k_P (2026-06-20 10:55:39+00:00): zdravim, na tejto ceste https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1432146688 ste odstranili typ cesty grade1 co je najlepsia mozna kvalita a znamena pevny alebo spevneny povrch co je aj pravda kedze je tam novy asfalt...

na tejto ceste https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/67919564 ste takisto zmenili nespravny povrch, jemne kamienky tam urcite nie su, su tam velke kamene a ta cesta je dost zla
Michal Polášek (2026-06-20 11:09:04+00:00): Zdravím, díky za upozornění, opravil jsem to a u polní cesty přidal smoothness=bad. I když povrch na té polní cestě je to sporný, kameny tam podle mě tak velké nebyly na čistý gravel.
Patr1k_P (2026-06-20 18:18:53+00:00): veru su, jazdim tadial dost casto..ale teraz su trochu ujazdene, lebo ako to tam cele prerabali tak tie nakladne auta ich trochu ujazdili...rozhodne tam nie je fine_gravel co su take male kamienky ako trebars medzi batakom a vyklopnikom v sudkach
Raquel Dezidério Souto (2026-06-18 21:43:24+00:00): legal! Já testando o tm ;)
RadicalMasker (2026-06-17 17:47:10+00:00): *and
smeòrach (2026-06-25 22:12:54+00:00): Carson a bhios tu fhathasd a' cur ainm Gàidhlig ri "alt_name" a bharrachd air name:gd? Chan eil ciall ann. The alt_name is for alternate names in the default language for the relation. Gaelic is already contained in name:gd
eggie (2026-06-17 20:02:26+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
yelisey90 (2026-06-17 20:01:25+00:00): rv - nope, these are garages, no building passage through them

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184243514
HAmap (2026-06-17 20:11:22+00:00): Hallo @Johannes-DH6TQ
bei diesem Reitverbotschild habe ich das tagging verbessert. Ich vermute du fängst gerade an? Ich gebe dir gerne ein paar Tipps, wenn du magst.
Viele Grüße
HAmap
user_5359 (2026-06-19 07:59:35+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13948275519. What is the mean of the tag camera:signed=BNP?
Equipe 1 de cartographie (2026-06-24 06:48:02+00:00): Hello user_5359.
That's a mistake, I suppose.
We organized last week a first initiation on editing surveillance cameras on OSM. I suppose the person wanted to note : supervisor : BNP (it's a bank).
Thank you for your comment
user_5359 (2026-06-24 08:34:02+00:00): Did you mean operator=BNP (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dsurveillance)?
Equipe 1 de cartographie (2026-06-24 08:45:48+00:00): Yes sorry, I mean operator
I'll check it today
yelisey90 (2026-06-17 20:05:58+00:00): rv - I would agree with the eastern part (still needs confirmation), but western part is definitely incorrect, there are garages

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184243668
eggie (2026-06-17 20:14:02+00:00): Je  hebt het telefoonnummer verwijderd. Klopt dat?



MVG
eggie
W1mpie13 (2026-06-21 07:14:13+00:00): Ja, dat klopt. Is mijn eigen adres. Ik wordt de laatste tijd te veel lastig gevallen, vandaar de verwijdering van telefoonnummer. Groeten Wim
eggie (2026-06-21 07:18:01+00:00): 👍
peb-kac (2026-06-24 08:38:25+00:00): In het verkeersbesluit (https://zoek.officielebekendmakingen.nl/gmb-2026-274814.html) zie ik geen geslotenverklaring opgenomen voor "Termoors" en "Penderskoolhofweg". Waarom hebben deze wegen dan toch motor_vehicle=agricultural etc. gekregen?

Daarnaast vraag ik me af of deze wijzigingen nu al doorgevoerd moeten worden, aangezien de fysieke verkeersborden mogelijk nog niet geplaatst zijn. Of heb je dit kunnen verifiëren?
Martin Borsje (2026-06-24 10:35:20+00:00): Volgens het kennuisgevingsblad van de gemeente Voerendaal van onlangs zijn de maatregelen per onmiddellijke ingang. Bij de kennisgeving is ook een pfd-bijlage waar precies aangegeven staat voor welke wegstukken het geldt.
Martin Borsje (2026-06-24 10:36:22+00:00): De bijlage betreft de bebordingstekeningen deelgebieden.
peb-kac (2026-07-31 14:52:53+00:00): Het kenningsgevingsblad suggereert inderdaad dat de borden voor Termoors en Penderskoolhofweg gelden. Inmiddels staat in beide zijwegen echter bord C12 (uitgezonderd landbouwverkeer). Daarom heb ik de beperkingen naar de zijwegen verplaatst: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186710684
Hetisbakkerijdepinknietdegier (2026-06-17 19:56:42+00:00): Ik heb de source en source:date tags weer hersteld bij adres node Ketsheuvel 56. Ik neem aan dat dit een foutje was.
W1mpie13 (2026-06-21 07:30:11+00:00): Er staan 4 gebouwen op het terrein van Fort Orthen: 
1. Nico Schuurmanshuis (Stichting gemeenschapshuis Orthen), adres Ketsheuvel 50.
2. Handboog vereniging Prins Bernhard, adres Ketsheuvel 52.
3. Schijvenloods ( gehuurd door Nico Schuurmanshuis) Ketsheuvel 54.
4. Fort Orthen , verdedigingswerk, rijksmonument. (Units zijn verhuurd aan kunstenaars, niet openbaar)
Allemaal postcode 5231 PT. 
Info: https://Orthen.nl
Hetisbakkerijdepinknietdegier (2026-06-17 19:59:55+00:00): Op BAG bestaat dit adres niet, bestaat deze in het echt wel? En wat betekent de fixme?

De begraafplaats Ketsheuvel staat er al in als een gebied, zie:http://openstreetmap.org/way/79855353
eggie (2026-06-17 20:10:06+00:00): De adresnode met duplicated info heb ik verwijderd.
MVG
eggie
W1mpie13 (2026-06-21 07:17:21+00:00): Er staat begraafplaats vermeld. Het is een kerkhof. Een kerkhof ligt bij een kerk en begraafplaats niet. 
Het adres is Ketsheuvel 26
eggie (2026-06-21 07:21:45+00:00): Oke, maar dan zul je het op het vlak 'moeten' aanpassen.

Mvg,
eggie
eggie (2026-06-21 07:25:24+00:00): Volgens deze site zou het al correct gemapt zijn..
https://www.bossche-encyclopedie.nl/overig/begraafplaats%20ketsheuvel/algemeen.htm
W1mpie13 (2026-06-21 14:01:48+00:00): Als je de reactie van de gemeente leest, aanwijzing tot gemeentelijk monument: dan spreken ze over “kerkhof”. 
Bossche encyclopedie spreekt over begraafplaats, wat incorrect is. 
Zie ook
https://orthenseschaar.nl/kerkhof/

Aanpassen op het vlak? 
Hoe doe je dat? 
Of doe jij dat?
eggie (2026-06-21 14:21:50+00:00): Up to you.. Je selecteert de omtrek van de begraafplaats. Zoekt de regel met name.. op en past evt de naam aan.
Wanneer de andere naam ook nog in gebruik is kun je alt_name toevoegen.
Succes,
eggie
Ewen Hill (2026-07-25 13:23:39+00:00): Hi aryanvombatkere, thank you for mapping the new Melbourne Airport car parks. I am just wondering where you got the parking aisle layouts please?
aryanvombatkere (2026-07-27 16:29:50+00:00): The airport is our client, and we received this data from them. Thankyou
Ewen Hill (2026-07-27 19:04:03+00:00): Thank you for the reply. This should have been discussed as a bulk import with a waiver and that there was no mention of it in the changeset may result in reverting these changesets. What we don't want is OSM to have copyrighted data that causes a legal issue later on.  With bulk imports, please go through the approved process - see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
catgirlseraid (2026-07-28 00:23:50+00:00): Hi aryanvombatkere

In the future can you please include this source in your changeset description or source tag? This is ideal to prevent future issues with where the data might have came from. Additionally, if OpenStreetMap editing is something your company does often please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing and create a page on the wiki following those instructions and link it on your profile. This is so that other mappers know you are mapping on behalf of a company. If you need any help with this process please reach out!

Welcome to OSM!
aharvey (2026-07-28 01:10:07+00:00): Thanks @aryanvombatkere for confirming where this data was sourced from and why it's being added. Without knowing that we don't know if the data is being copied from somewhere in breach of copyright or not.

If it's the airports own data and you're adding this on their behalf, then I don't believe any waivers are required as it would be covered under the Contributor Terms https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Contributor_Terms

The waivers are when we're pulling published CC BY or even data published without an open data license, and wanting our mappers to be able to upload it into OSM.

If care is being taken in the edits and it's all still being done manually I would be fine without a full import proposal, but if other mappers feel it needs an import proposal then it should.
Ewen Hill (2026-07-28 07:07:54+00:00): Hi Aryan and thank you @Aharvey for the clarification in the last message and apologies for the misdirection in my earlier morning follow up comment.  

As @catgirlseraid said, welcome to OSM and all the best.
Glassman (2026-06-18 21:50:47+00:00): Is the house number correct? They usually don't have words in them. Can you review this edit?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184241315
multimodaal (2026-07-13 11:27:04+00:00): Hoi, omdat de voormalige vuilstort er nu meer uitziet als een gewoon begroeid terrein heb ik er een lifecycle-prefix voor gezet zoals aangegeven in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse=landfill . Heb ook de beschrijvende waarde verplaatst van name= naar description. Heb ook even mijn fotoś van eerder bezoek er op nageslagen: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=957569165033503
Groet!
Poretsew (2026-07-31 15:51:08+00:00): Hoi, ik vond het al een lastig rommelig item om te taggen. Wat je aan tags hebt verbeterd lijkt me helemaal prima. Waarschijnlijk ben jij er iets handiger in en kent de tags beter ;-)
Ik heb survey:date=2026-06-16 weer teruggezet (i.p.v. 2019). Wat ik in juni zag en fotografeerde (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=862499513113615) komt overeen met de tags en de note die er nu bijstaan. 
Misschien over 1,5 jaar als de deklaag eroverheen is (planning zal wel wijzigen...) nog eens kijken of er weer natuur en wandelpaden terugkomen.
Vaidotas (2026-06-19 15:41:56+00:00): Ar čia iš tiesų yra kelias sutampantis su sklypo riba?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/924893553
birimkulova (2026-06-18 14:43:54+00:00): Thank you for the correction.
birimkulova (2026-06-18 14:45:22+00:00): Thank you for the correction.
yitimox (2026-06-17 20:09:15+00:00): hocam elinize sağlık. geçmişte metris arnavutköy bağlantı yolunda olduğu ulubatlı-mahmutbey yolunu da sürekli farklı kategoriye çekmeye çalışanlar var. tag olarak wikidata eklesek işlerini biraz daha zorlaştırırız diye düşünüyorum
Alikam (2026-06-18 11:43:59+00:00): rica ederim. belki ana yollarda düzeltme notu da ekleyebiliriz