piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
jb54osm (2023-09-09 10:25:39+00:00): Okido. Ik heb zojuist de verhuizing op de kaart gezet.
waldyrious (2025-01-20 18:10:32+00:00): Hi Domijtri. I noticed that you added some trees in this edit with `denotation=cemetery` while others were added with `denotation=cemeterybaronvoms2`. Was it a typo of some sort? Can they be changed to `cemetery` as well?
OddlyAngled (2023-09-07 00:51:37+00:00): unless the pass is actually named Unnamed Pass the standard is to remove the name tag entirely. it will still render properly in Caltopo and OSM
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140914204
OddlyAngled (2023-09-07 00:51:38+00:00): unless the pass is actually named Unnamed Pass the standard is to remove the name tag entirely. it will still render properly in Caltopo and OSM
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140914204
timfcallahan (2023-09-07 11:46:33+00:00): I have blanked out the name Thanks.
MxxCon (2023-09-09 07:13:41+00:00): Hello.
A restaurant changed its name and the type of food it serves but kept the same phone number and website address? Is that accurate?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140914353
sannkc (2023-09-06 23:20:36+00:00): The addresses may have changed, but it seems unlikely that the street name has changed from Horton Street to Beverly Avenue, given that another Beverly Avenue already exists two blocks to the east and the county website still shows Horton as the official name for parcels along this street.
NuthatchWings (2023-09-06 23:57:57+00:00): I had great difficulty navigating the map, but I clearly stated that the street name is Beverly Avenue. Exactly one block to the west is Beverly Lane. Because both streets had a 5611, there was constant hassle and confusion. 5611 Beverly Avenue is now non-existent but Google Maps can't seem to make this simple change.
maro21 (2023-09-12 18:57:29+00:00): A może to jeszcze? https://osm.org/changeset/133818438
PJ120 (2023-09-20 08:09:42+00:00): Has this topic been discussed by any affected community? If so, may i have a reference for that? In any case, please respond to the public discussion of a changeset before conducting large scale reverting: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133794995

In summary: The town names you have reverted were correctly placed, as agreed upon by the German OpenStreetMap community.

The names of the gminy you have reverted consist of a suitable German translation for the word "Gmina", followed by the German name of their administrative town; such translating is common practice in OpenStreetmap.
maraf24 (2023-09-20 08:33:30+00:00): "as agreed upon by the German OpenStreetMap community."

You need to discuss this with Polish OSM community.
However, using historical german names for name:de was already discussed with the conclusion such names should be placed in old_name:de tag.
Nonetheless your changesets clearly show sources used - "Wikipedia;http://gov.genealogy.net"
These are not valid sources.
PJ120 (2023-09-20 10:36:59+00:00): Like i said, give me a link to the public discussion. The current consensus within the German community is that longstanding German town names should be tagged under name:de, not just for larger cities but generally for those with longstanding German names. This is also implied on the wiki, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name:de

The website http://gov.genealogy.net is not a source but rather a collection of historical sources. In the case of these town names, the sources are official historical town directories, for example http://pbc.gda.pl/dlibra/docmetadata?id=7326, which are nowadays available under public domain, making them compatible with OSM. Because the historical sources are documented well on this website, and sometimes also on Wikipedia, i mentioned both as "sources" in the changeset.
ceirios (2023-09-06 23:04:04+00:00): Hi there!

I feel like this could be 'Pont Felindre' and not the mutated form ('Bont') since there is nothing that would mutate the P - could you please check?

Diolch
DankJae (2023-09-06 23:29:10+00:00): Helo Ceirios, but I am not a local (just reverting vandalism I noticed) so can't exactly check. I assume it is Pont. The deleted editor who made it, made other questionable edits, and as the other bridge was tagged Velindre Bridge, assumed it was an error and moved it. You could mark it with a note.
ceirios (2023-09-07 07:36:19+00:00): Great, thank you! I'll place a note
dvdhoven (2023-09-09 06:25:30+00:00): Ik heb deze changeset reverted.
Er was hier onlangs een rotonde ingetekend en die heb jij verwijderd.
Deze rotonde is gloednieuw en kennelijk heb jij je georiënteerd op verouderd beeldmateriaal.
Check altijd de history als je een situatie ziet die niet overeenkomt met de luchtfoto voor je gaat aanpassen en overleg eventueel met de mapper, die die situatie heeft ingetekend.
De mapper, die de rotonde heeft ingetekend is een mapper, die ter plaatse zeer goed bekend is.

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
dvdhoven (2023-09-09 06:47:56+00:00): Zie ook sattelietportaal:
https://www.satellietdataportaal.nl/?base=brtachtergrondkaart&res=0.3%2C0.5&datemin=09-09-2022&loc=51.92867%2C6.082011%2C18z&overlay=mos-0&marker=loc&acqdate=2023-09-07&acqid=20230907_104206_PNEO-04_1_1&sensor=Pleiades-NEO
moje_konto (2023-09-06 22:54:13+00:00): Węzły firm często mają też dodany adres - przydatne jeśli mogą być wątpliwości, w którym budynku dana firma jest - szczególnie w centrum, gdzie budynki są ciasno obok siebie i położenie węzła może nie być dokładne.

Jeśli firma zajmuje cały budynek, to sensowne jest jej naniesienie na istniejącym węźle adresu albo na budynku.

Ale przy dobrej pozycji węzła firmy można adres pominąć, przynajmniej teoretycznie wyszukiwarki powinny go ustalić z budynku.
highflyer74 (2023-09-22 14:57:57+00:00): Moin und danke für deine Mühe. So weit ich weiß, gibt es das Gebäude noch und steht lediglich leer. Der Supermarkt selbst ist bereits seit langer Zeit auf disused gesetzt / entfernt worden, das Gebäude würde ich nicht ändern, so lange es einfach nur leersteht, da es dadurch aus OSM als Gebäude verschwindet, aber ja immer noch ein Gebäude ist.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-23 17:28:18+00:00): have you wanted to map https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:vending%3Dparking_tickets ?
Jordi MF (2023-09-06 22:57:03+00:00): Me he equivocado con la descripción. Solamente he puesto el nombre de una calle según Catastro.
Awoobis (2023-09-06 23:38:49+00:00): Related changesets follow. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140916093 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140916162 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140916455
Awoobis (2023-09-07 00:07:57+00:00): oh also note that started it https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3233905
eggie (2023-09-07 14:10:36+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 
MVG, 
Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-17 08:28:15+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11173106792/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
shinterro (2025-04-17 22:43:49+00:00): Huh, odd, I have no idea how I added this as fixme in the first place. I will update this shortly with appropriate values.
shinterro (2025-04-17 22:43:57+00:00): (and thanks!)
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-18 17:11:01+00:00): https://github.com/Zverik/every_door/issues/880 is a related bug report with analysis how it may happen
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-18 17:11:38+00:00): to be more specific, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159980372 has analysis
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-31 15:37:49+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11173131309/history - what object you meant here?

what kind of car is mappable?
evgenykatyshev (2023-10-09 15:02:53+00:00): Hello. I see you've changed this building. Are you sure that building https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/549136321 is mosque? Last week I saw sign of club called "Aura moonlight" on it. And it looked abandoned.
zeon84-74 (2023-10-10 07:36:35+00:00): fixed
LockOnGuy (2023-09-07 18:11:08+00:00): ڕاستی, You deleted the name:ar tag from this store, I added the name base on survey on site, I saw the name inside the store couple of months ago.      
It's also on the advertised brochures and the bags.              
The same Arabic name was on a node in this location that you deleted it entirely weeks ago without moving the name from the node to the way.         
Deleting valid names the business use is vandalism, Can you return the name? Regards.
jMapsAu (2023-09-07 04:38:57+00:00): Removal of maxspeed tags removes this data from the Max Speed view of Open Railway Map. What validator errors were you seeing @Warin61?
Warin61 (2023-09-07 08:45:30+00:00): A)
oneway=yes with maxspeed:forward or maxspeed:backward .. that is not logical 

B)
maxspeed:forward equals maxspeed:backward, just use maxspeed instead. 

There maybe more of these logical types of errors..
CjMalone (2023-09-11 11:29:36+00:00): Hey, are you sure https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4412608264#map=19/40.38633/-86.90252 went from a Pay Less to a Kroger?

https://www.pay-less.com/stores/grocery/in/lafayette/beck-lane-payless/021/00822
Yzzyx (2023-09-11 11:43:49+00:00): Well, rats. I remember OSM asking me if I wanted to change it, and I thought I had told it "NO". It is still a PayLess. I will try to fix it.
CjMalone (2023-09-11 11:59:35+00:00): Thank you. Looks like you fixed it, but let me know if you ever need any help.

I've looked into the recommendation, it seems PayLess is missing from https://nsi.guide I'll add it. Then because there was operator=Kroger matched against Kroger.

Thanks
idkwhatname2use (2023-09-07 02:32:17+00:00): yikes!
Kai Johnson (2023-11-02 13:57:28+00:00): Thanks for contributing to OSM while you're working on your L3 Géo certificate. I thought you should know that the elevation tag should only be a numeric value in meters. The unit "m" for meters should be omitted. / Merci de contribuer à OSM pendant que vous travaillez sur votre certificat L3 Géo. Je pensais que vous devriez savoir que l'étiquette d'élévation ne doit être qu'une valeur numérique en mètres. L'unité « m » pour les mètres doit être omise.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140917855
Kai Johnson (2023-11-02 14:07:37+00:00): Thanks for contributing to OSM while you're working on your L3 Géo certificate. It is helpful if you can include a detailed changeset comment that describes the changes that were made. / Merci de contribuer à OSM pendant que vous travaillez sur votre certificat L3 Géo. Il est utile d'inclure un commentaire détaillé sur l'ensemble de modifications décrivant les modifications apportées.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140917970
moje_konto (2023-09-07 19:46:36+00:00): Znowu podmieniłeś molo. Skasowałeś stare i narysowałeś praktycznie identyczne jako nowy obiekt.
Nie kasuje się historii. Przywróciłem starą: www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140955786
marczoutendijk (2024-11-28 18:28:48+00:00): Hi,

About this: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1205663877

landuse=area is nonsense! Have you ever seen landuse which is NOT an area?
Please read this:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_features#Landuse
landuse=* should describe the type of  landuse, not its dimensions.

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
RoadGeek_MD99 (2025-02-15 21:45:58+00:00): Sorry about that typo and fixed it.
Kai Johnson (2023-11-02 14:10:35+00:00): Thanks for contributing to OSM while you're working on your L3 Géo certificate. It is helpful if you can include a detailed changeset comment that describes the changes that were made. / Merci de contribuer à OSM pendant que vous travaillez sur votre certificat L3 Géo. Il est utile d'inclure un commentaire détaillé sur l'ensemble de modifications décrivant les modifications apportées.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140918095
rickmastfan67 (2023-09-25 17:56:50+00:00): Has the 'Military Cutoff Road Extension' officially opened yet?  Can't find any news articles saying that it has yet.  If you know of such an article, please link me.
Joseph R P (2023-09-25 21:30:37+00:00): As far as I know, parts of it have opened around the southern terminus and within the residential subdivisions to provide access to offshoot roads, and the remainder should be open by the end of this fall. The entire roadway is complete though. I've just added access=no to the sections I'm not 100% sure are open.
rickmastfan67 (2023-09-26 09:09:50+00:00): Alright.  Was only asking due to a completely separate project on roads, and we were wondering if it was open or not, due to possibly needing to add NC-417 to that project (if it is indeed posted as such).
rickmastfan67 (2023-09-29 06:14:32+00:00): LOL!  The road just opened.

Haven't found any pictures yet that prove or disprove the route number, but you can remove the access=no tags at least.

https://www.wect.com/2023/09/28/monumental-day-military-cutoff-road-extension-open-drivers-after-more-than-ten-years-planning-construction/
rickmastfan67 (2023-09-29 06:18:16+00:00): Actually, take that back, the video @ that link shows a NC-417 shield @ the 1:45 mark.  So, route number confirmed.
Joseph R P (2023-09-29 16:31:30+00:00): Well I'll be damned! I'll clean everything up. Thanks for the notification.
Sandal man (2023-09-07 07:38:25+00:00): Hello,
please make smalle change sets, this helps others in tracking changes. 
Not in Spain and the Philippines please.

Thank you.
arjunaraoc (2024-01-04 09:37:03+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).

Please keep your updates to smaller areas.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140918194
Kai Johnson (2023-11-02 14:38:29+00:00): Thanks for contributing to OSM while you're working on your L3 Géo certificate. When you are mapping buildings with square corners, it is best to use the "q" key in iD to square the corners of the way. / Merci de contribuer à OSM pendant que vous travaillez sur votre certificat L3 Géo. Lorsque vous cartographiez des bâtiments avec des coins carrés, il est préférable d'utiliser la touche "q" dans iD pour mettre les coins du chemin au carré.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140918376
Kai Johnson (2023-11-02 14:56:24+00:00): Thanks for contributing to OSM while you're working on your L3 Géo certificate. This changset was good work! There are a couple of small improvements you could make. We don't put descriptions in the name=* tag, so instead of name=cocoteraie, you could use the species=* tag to be more specific about the type of trees in a wooded area. Take a look at https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cocotier for the species value. When mapping buildings with square corners, you can use the "q" key in iD to make the outline square. It is also good practice to use the changeset comment to describe the changes that were made. / Merci de contribuer à OSM pendant que vous travaillez sur votre certificat L3 Géo. Cet ensemble de modifications était du bon travail ! Il y a quelques petites améliorations que vous pourriez apporter. Nous ne mettons pas de descriptions dans la balise name=*, donc au lieu de name=cocoteraie, vous pouvez utiliser la balise Specs=* pour être plus précis sur le type d'arbres dans une zone boisée. Jetez un œil à https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cocotier pour la valeur de l'espèce. Lorsque vous cartographiez des bâtiments aux coins carrés, vous pouvez utiliser la touche « q » dans iD pour rendre le contour carré. Il est également recommandé d'utiliser le commentaire changeset pour décrire les modifications apportées.
ion_chi (2026-03-10 22:40:20+00:00): BNSF doesn't operate Metro Transit's light rail services. Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179661759
Kai Johnson (2023-11-02 18:30:54+00:00): It is better to preserve the history of previous elements in OSM by editing the existing elements rather than deleting them and replacing them. / Il est préférable de conserver l'historique des éléments précédents dans OSM en éditant les éléments existants plutôt que de les supprimer et de les remplacer.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140918847
AnnaCatarina (2025-04-20 17:26:33+00:00): Hello, where do You see this second rail in the westbound of the junction at Medias Aguas? With the latest satellite pictures, I do not find it... Regards, Anna Catarina
Kai Johnson (2023-11-02 18:38:34+00:00): Thanks for contributing to OSM while you're working on your L3 Géo certificate. The work here is pretty good, but you should make sure the area for the forest doesn't extend past the area for the coastline. Also, when you're working on separate features like these, it's best to make sure the outlines aren't glued together. / Merci de contribuer à OSM pendant que vous travaillez sur votre certificat L3 Géo. Le travail ici est plutôt bon, mais vous devez vous assurer que la zone forestière ne s'étend pas au-delà de la zone côtière. De plus, lorsque vous travaillez sur des fonctionnalités distinctes comme celles-ci, il est préférable de vous assurer que les contours ne sont pas collés ensemble.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140919109
ftcat (2023-09-07 12:29:56+00:00): Hi Uwaina,

These objects you have mapped are not buildings but charcoal kilns, they are temporary, being constructed from clay. They are built by local people clearing the forest and are a major problem in deforestation in Zambia
ftcat (2023-09-07 12:32:22+00:00): This is a major fault with AI mapping
Kai Johnson (2023-11-02 18:59:49+00:00): Good work on this changeset, but the changeset comment could be more descriptive. / Bon travail sur cet ensemble de modifications, mais le commentaire sur l'ensemble de modifications pourrait être plus descriptif.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140919186
eggie (2023-09-07 14:12:06+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 
MVG, 
Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
Kai Johnson (2023-11-02 19:07:31+00:00): When we map reefs in OSM, we only map the part that is permanently underwater. Instead of tagging the outline with natural=reef, way/138155516 and way/22391205 should be members of a multipolygon relation and the natural=reef tag should only be applied to the relation. Also, please square up your buildings with the "q" key in iD! / Lorsque nous cartographions les récifs dans OSM, nous cartographions uniquement la partie qui est en permanence sous l'eau. Au lieu de baliser le contour avec natural=reef, way/138155516 et way/22391205 doivent être membres d'une relation multipolygone et la balise natural=reef ne doit être appliquée qu'à la relation. Veuillez également aligner vos bâtiments avec la touche « q » dans iD !
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140919217
Kai Johnson (2023-11-06 18:57:58+00:00): When this changeset deleted way/22382991 and way/22383063 it also removed them from relation/1363096, relation/6082562, relation/7168774, and relation/8080888. The replacement natural=coastline elements were not added to these relations. So these islands are no longer part of The Society Islands, Leeward Islands, Maupiti, or the 987-03 boundary. In general, it would be better to edit the elements in place to preserve the history and relation membership. But to fix the relations, the replacement elements need to be added to them. / Lorsque cet changeset a supprimé way/22382991 et way/22383063, il les a également supprimés de la relation/1363096, de la relation/6082562, de la relation/7168774 et de la relation/8080888. Les éléments de remplacement natural=coastline n’ont pas été ajoutés à ces relations. Ces îles ne font donc plus partie des îles de la Société, des îles Sous le Vent, de Maupiti ou de la frontière 987-03. De manière générale, il serait préférable d'éditer les éléments en place pour préserver l'historique et l'appartenance à la relation. Mais pour fixer les relations, il faut y ajouter des éléments de remplacement.
Kai Johnson (2023-11-14 14:36:39+00:00): Thanks for contributing to OSM while you're working on your L3 Géo certificate. Instead of deleting the building=yes tag, you could use building=church for Église Sainte-Marie-Madeleine. / Merci de contribuer à OSM pendant que vous travaillez sur votre certificat L3 Géo. Au lieu de supprimer la balise building=yes, vous pouvez utiliser building=church pour l'Église Sainte-Marie-Madeleine.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140919231
Kai Johnson (2023-11-06 22:47:01+00:00): It looks like the original building outlines were better and should be restored. Try using Mapbox Satellite imagery which has better resolution at this location. / Il semble que les contours du bâtiment d'origine étaient meilleurs et devraient être restaurés. Essayez d'utiliser les images satellite Mapbox qui ont une meilleure résolution à cet endroit.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140919252
Kai Johnson (2023-11-06 22:49:59+00:00): Thanks for contributing to OSM. The new outline of the building is good, but it would be better to edit the existing way rather than deleting and replacing it. This would preserve the history of the way. / Merci d'avoir contribué à OSM. Le nouveau contour du bâtiment est bon, mais il serait préférable de modifier le tracé existant plutôt que de le supprimer et de le remplacer. Cela préserverait l'histoire du way.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140919306
Kai Johnson (2023-11-14 14:51:14+00:00): It looks like the area with name=Cocoterie is a plantation. Instead of natural=wood, consider landuse=orchard. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dorchard. And instead of name=Cocoteraie, consider trees=coconut_palms. / Il semble que la zone name=Cocoteraie soit une plantation. Au lieu de naturel=wood, pensez à landuse=orchard. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dorchard. Et au lieu de name=Cocoteraie, considérez trees=coconut_palms.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140919361
Kai Johnson (2023-11-14 15:36:38+00:00): I think alt_name=Scilly should be restored to relation/6082214. See https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuae_(%C3%AEles_de_la_Soci%C3%A9t%C3%A9). Also, it is better to preserve history by editing existing ways rather than deleting and replacing them (e.g., way/22382980). / Je pense que alt_name=Scilly devrait être restauré dans la relation/6082214. Voir https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuae_(%C3%AEles_de_la_Soci%C3%A9t%C3%A9). En outre, il est préférable de préserver l'historique en modifiant les ways existants plutôt que de les supprimer et de les remplacer (par exemple, way/22382980).
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140919397
Kai Johnson (2023-11-14 16:29:28+00:00): It is better to square up buildings with the "q" key. / Il est préférable de mettre au carré les bâtiments avec la touche "q".
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140919400
Kai Johnson (2023-11-14 16:32:27+00:00): If the building is square, use the "q" key to make the outline square. / Si le bâtiment est carré, utilisez la touche "q" pour rendre le contour carré.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140919527