piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Supaplex (2025-03-15 19:52:56+00:00): 因為描繪非開放授權圖資而回退，請參見 https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/topic/124651
累犯將送至 Data Working Group

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163665662
Grass-snake (2025-03-18 17:52:59+00:00): Ссылка на Колу https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/195218
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-07 05:33:48+00:00): DWG revert - poor quality mapping

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164616497
StC (2025-03-15 13:15:07+00:00): Hello !

en déplaçant le carrefour Avenue de Viton, ce changeset a brisé la continuité du réseau, et de conséquence en conséquence celle d'un itinéraire national. Pourras-tu jeter un coup d'œil stp ? il me semble que, même si le poteau est là, le carrefour (là où les chemins se séparent) est à quelques mètres de là.
Patchi (2025-03-15 15:33:39+00:00): Le problème vient de l'utilisation de la relation "Avenue de Viton - Cité St-Michel" dans le GR9. Cette relation ne devrait pas être utilisée par le GR9 puisqu'elle fait la liaison PR Madelaine <-> Avenue de Viton <-> Cité St-Michel en passant par la véloroute. Le GR9 ne monte pas au niveau de la véloroute ni ne prend l'escalier d'ailleurs (marque GR au coin du mur presque au niveau de l'impasse de la Fantaisie). Donc je peux le remettre comme c'était avant mais ce n'est pas correct non plus. Pour modifier le GR9 avec ces enchainements de relations j'ai connu mieux (et personnellement je considère incohérent d'utiliser des relations lwn dans une relation nwn - les deux ne sont pas forcément reliés).
Supaplex (2025-03-15 19:52:57+00:00): 因為描繪非開放授權圖資而回退，請參見 https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/topic/124651
累犯將送至 Data Working Group

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163665662
Frans S (2025-03-17 14:22:10+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
You did not tag the crossings highway/waterway, Mostly a ford.
Be sure you connected both waterway and highway when adding a crossing tag.
Best regards
Arnold Nkwabong (2025-03-17 18:31:57+00:00): Thanks for the feedback, i've fixed them
mwk3 (2025-03-15 17:31:11+00:00): Wygląda na to, że usunięte zostały niemal wszystkie płoty. I przyznam, że nie rozumiem dlaczego.
lili_2022 (2025-04-09 01:46:03+00:00): Hey there, just wondering can you please tell me what NPA is?
tmpl trce (2025-04-09 05:22:57+00:00): Hey sorry, NRA is just shorthand for non released access, it was a typo. NRA just generally refers to whenever some plan etc. gets hosted on a server but is unlisted and can only be therefore reached by tying in the URL and has no hyperlinks attached to it. NTLIS now shows the roads as existing as of today however so it is now completely accessible :)
nevw (2025-04-09 12:34:12+00:00): The NTLIS is a copyrighted source and we do not have explicit permission to use their data for mapping in osm.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Data_Sources
tmpl trce (2025-04-09 12:52:22+00:00): ive consulted this site before and have glossed over completely that it is indeed under copyright, 100% my fault. my thought was that their data had become open at some point in time which is obviously not the case. i will stop adding them as sources now and will divert to other sources now, thanks for informing :)
NeisReview (2025-03-15 15:05:30+00:00): #NameCheck

Hello and welcome to OSM.

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits, particularly those concerning the names you've added or modified.

Some of these names caught my attention as they are quite unique or a bit unusual. Could you please confirm if these additions were intentional or if they might have been added mistakenly?

Looking forward to your response.

Thank you!
Bayu198 (2025-03-27 02:21:10+00:00): Hello, your wellcome.

Can you tell me which name were you refering to? Perhaps the name "Danau Adhigana"? If that were you refering to, there is a big sign at the southern shore of the lake with the text "Adhigana" facing to the lake.

Or maybe other names? Please tell me.

Thanks.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-18 03:03:33+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165094217
infeeeee (2025-03-15 22:05:20+00:00): Szia! Üdv az OpenStreetMapen!

Ez létező név, vagy te találtad ki? 

Ha kérdésed merülne fel, a magyar szerkesztő közösség elérhetőségeit megtalálod ezen az oldalon: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hungary/Közösség

További jó térképezést!
infeeeee (2025-03-17 10:25:52+00:00): Nem érkezett válasz, így a gyanús elnevezés visszavonva.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163725006
vasony (2025-03-18 20:13:28+00:00): Előzmény: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/778502099
TriRIK (2025-03-15 13:48:38+00:00): Овде немаат детални информации за патиштата каде поминуваат Исто така ова е од 2011, а RAMPS проектот е од 2023. Имено од службен весник пишува:

- Р1101 -> Прилеп (врска со А1,А3)-Битола-Макази -Царев двор (врска со P1307)
  - врска со А1,А3 е кај Ново Лагово

- P1303 Прилеп (врска со Р1101)-Македонски Брод-Кичево (врска со А2)
  - Р1101 почнува кај Ново Лагово
  - Според оваа (грешна) измена Р1303 почнува од А1 и би требало да биде Р11хх пат а не Р13хх пат кои почнуваат од А3.

-P1306 поред RAMPS проект од 2023 http://62.77.137.99/roads/files/Sections/RAMS_report-Section__1372.pdf

- Р1312 поред RAMPS проект од 2023 http://62.77.137.99/roads/files/Sections/RAMS_report-Section__1404.pdf

- Повеќе информации и детали на „Државни патишта и патни секции“ (RAMPS Project): http://62.77.137.99/roads/index.php?l=mk
- https://i.imgur.com/x6qrdsR.png
TriRIK (2025-03-15 13:50:53+00:00): ENGLISH TRANSALTION:

Here they do not have detailed information about the roads they pass through. This is also from 2011, and the RAMPS project is from 2023. Namely, from the official gazette it says:

- R1101 -> Prilep (connection with A1, A3)-Bitola-Makazi -Tsarev dvor (connection with P1307)

- connection with A1, A3 is at Novo Lagovo

- P1303 Prilep (connection with R1101)-Makedonski Brod-Kicevo (connection with A2)

- R1101 starts at Novo Lagovo

- According to this (wrong) amendment, R1303 starts from A1 and should be R11xx road and not R13xx road which starts from A3.

-P1306 next to RAMPS project from 2023 http://62.77.137.99/roads/files/Sections/RAMS_report-Section__1372.pdf

- P1312 next to RAMPS project from 2023 http://62.77.137.99/roads/files/Sections/RAMS_report-Section__1404.pdf

- More information and details on "State Roads and Road Sections" (RAMPS Project): http://62.77.137.99/roads/index.php?l=mk
- https://i.imgur.com/x6qrdsR.png
MK 1 (2025-03-15 16:20:22+00:00): So 2 meters wide street is regional road, and streets with 4 lanes and separations are not?
Come and remove signs and marks.
TriRIK (2025-03-15 16:24:51+00:00): Sorry, but I don't make the rules. If the government designated those as regional roads, those are regional roads and should be mapped accordingly, even if they don't make sense.

For lanes and width, there are other tags.
MK 1 (2025-03-15 16:25:06+00:00): Until yesterday R1101 started in Gradsko according same IGEA and RAMS, today not. Boulevars became ordinary streets, living streets became regional roads.
TriRIK (2025-03-15 16:33:02+00:00): I don't see any source for that. And if "yesterday" was like that but "today" that is changed, the map should also be updated accordingly.
MK 1 (2025-03-15 16:36:31+00:00): Accordingly to situation on the ground, A1 starts from Lukoil Prilep. A3 is A1, as Prilep Ring road.
So please, change it like that. And also A3 runs to Pletvar and beyond according to milestones.
MK 1 (2025-03-15 16:38:08+00:00): And please tell me, why they build highway exit to street.
Enlighten me.
MK 1 (2025-03-15 16:39:18+00:00): And yes, there is no R1103 road in Prilep.
MK 1 (2025-03-15 16:40:06+00:00): Sources are in your mind. Creation of R1103 road in Prilep. Already exist road with that reference near Kavadarci.
MK 1 (2025-03-15 16:41:03+00:00): And for that why R1303 road starts in R1101 and R1107 ask Rams and igea.
TriRIK (2025-03-15 16:56:14+00:00): My sources are official, you can check them here: https://i.imgur.com/x6qrdsR.png
As well as the links I provided at the top of the comments.

The new expressway is mentioned as A1 thought the news multiple times.

Old signs with old markings (old_ref) still exists thought Macedonia like M5, R501, etc. you can see even today.
TriRIK (2025-03-15 16:57:28+00:00): R1107 starts at Rosoman and ends at R1101
R1101 starts at end of A1
R1303 starts at start of A3.

All this are at the same area (klučka Novo Lagovo)
MK 1 (2025-03-15 17:03:07+00:00): Where R1303 starts?
TriRIK (2025-03-15 17:13:55+00:00): Like I said, at start of A3 (klučka Novo Lagovo).
However I mistyped it and corrected it here (however the relation was correct): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163660143

Thank you for making me look at it.
MK 1 (2025-03-15 18:30:23+00:00): R1303 starting in R1101 and R1107

Now you are ridicoulous
TriRIK (2025-03-15 23:32:34+00:00): I'm repeating myself, you can check the RAMS Project where any road starts and ends.

R1303 starts at klučka Novo Lagovo
In fact here is whole road segments, from start to end
http://62.77.137.99/roads/files/Sections/RAMS_report-Section__1351.pdf
http://62.77.137.99/roads/files/Sections/RAMS_report-Section__1352.pdf
http://62.77.137.99/roads/files/Sections/RAMS_report-Section__1353.pdf
http://62.77.137.99/roads/files/Sections/RAMS_report-Section__1354.pdf
http://62.77.137.99/roads/files/Sections/RAMS_report-Section__1355.pdf
http://62.77.137.99/roads/files/Sections/RAMS_report-Section__1356.pdf
http://62.77.137.99/roads/files/Sections/RAMS_report-Section__1357.pdf
http://62.77.137.99/roads/files/Sections/RAMS_report-Section__1358.pdf
http://62.77.137.99/roads/files/Sections/RAMS_report-Section__1359.pdf
NeisReview (2025-03-15 18:17:45+00:00): #NoTags

Hi, welcome to OSM.

I've reviewed your latest map edits and it seems that this changeset you created includes nodes and ways without any tags. Could there have been an issue during the mapping process?

Looking forward to your response.

Thank you!
NeisReview (2025-03-15 18:18:02+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163651925
NeisReview (2025-03-15 18:08:36+00:00): #NewTags

Hi, welcome to OSM!

With this and your latest changesets, you've added a significant number of features that appear to share similarities in their tags. Could you please let us know more about the source of your mapping activity and your utilized (new) tags?

Looking forward to hearing from you.

Thanks!
Johnny Mapperseed (2025-03-15 14:29:55+00:00): Imagery switched to Lorain county orthoimagery from ESRI - Changeset comment is incorrect.
literan (2025-03-16 11:16:12+00:00): криво написан адрес. Удалю, попробуйте написать правильно, как на зданиях
NeisRevert (2025-03-15 16:07:42+00:00): #DataImport

Hi, welcome to OSM!

With this changeset, you've added a significant number of features that appear to share similarities in their tags. Could you please let us know more about the source of your mapping activity? Is this a data import?

Looking forward to hearing from you.

Thanks!
NeisRevert (2025-03-15 16:07:21+00:00): #DataImport

Hi, welcome to OSM!

With this changeset, you've added a significant number of features that appear to share similarities in their tags. Could you please let us know more about the source of your mapping activity? Is this a data import?

Looking forward to hearing from you.

Thanks!
b-jazz (2025-03-17 17:25:15+00:00): Hey there Matthew,

Thanks for your golf contributions. We appreciate your help. 

I wanted to point out a small error in what you are doing. An example is the multipolygon relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18829142. I believe you were the one to turn the fairway and green into a multipolygon. That's awesome and much appreciated. But you left the fairway tag on the outer polygon which duplicates the tag on the relation itself and also means that everything inside that outer (including the green) is a fairway, which isn't right. Whenever you make a relation, you need to make sure the outer polygon isn't tagged as well. Let me know if this doesn't make sense. Thanks!
Frans S (2025-03-17 13:36:16+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
Please solve the issues shown by the issue triangle before you upload your mapping.
You did not tag the crossings highway/waterway, Mostly a ford.
Best regards
Tatfahren (2025-03-15 18:08:08+00:00): Vorsicht bei geschätzten Hydrantengrößen, die angabe auf den Schildern mit "H..." beziehen sich auf den Durchmesser der angeschlossenen Versorgungsleitung. Die Hydranten können sowohl bei einer 80er Leitung, als auch bei einer 600er Leitung gleich aussehen.

Wenn die Hydranten oberirdisch gleich sind, müsste bei beiden https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:couplings:diameters gleich sein.

Wenn keine Durchmesserangabe vorhanden ist, man die aber gerne hinzufügen möchte, kann man nach den nächsten Schiebern der Wasserleitung suchen (blaue Schilder mit S), bei denen ist auch der Durchmesser der Leitung angegeben, wobei man zuvor die richtung der Leitung nach dem Schieber bestimmen muss. (nicht das eine 200er Leitung am Schieber zu einer 150er wird, und man den Hydrant an der 200er Leitung als 150 einträgt.)

Wenn man sich unsicher ist, da nicht beschildert, sollte man besser garnichts eintragen, und stattdessen "fire_hydrant:diameter:signed=no" hinzufügen
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:57:45+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401579
MxxCon (2025-03-18 03:39:40+00:00): Map vandalism reverted.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163757164
whb (2025-03-16 16:57:15+00:00): Guten Tag,

die in diesem Änderungssatz verschobenen Straßenpunkte (zur Visualisierung siehe https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=163655004 ) habe ich wieder zurück geschoben:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163697527

Viele Grüße
whb
da_nil_ (2025-03-16 17:04:08+00:00): Vielen Dank, die ganzen Verschiebungen waren nicht von uns beabsichtigt! Wir haben OSM zum ersten Mal für ein Uni-Projekt genutzt und wollten nur Attribute an Ampeln/Fußgängerüberwegen ergänzen, danke nochmal für die Korrektur.
LG
MxxCon (2025-03-18 03:39:41+00:00): Map vandalism reverted.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163757164
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:57:39+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401573
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:57:33+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401569
GerdP (2025-09-18 14:39:18+00:00): Moin!
Ich habe an den diesem Stück https://www.osm.org/way/1429507049
der Wetscher Bruchstraße kein Verkehrszeichen 240 gefunden, weder gestern noch auf älteren Fotos von September 2024. Habe daher den Nebenweg wieder zum reinen Gehweg gemacht. Siehe https://www.osm.org/changeset/172116814
Möglicherweise wolltest Du einen anderen Weg ändern?
Vinber-Pro (2025-05-15 15:55:52+00:00): Bonjor,
j'ai l'impression qu'il y a un doublon de amenity=library ici, porté à la fois par la relation avec pour nous Les temps modernes sur l'ensemble du bati mais aussi un node, nommé médiathèque de Tarnos.

je suis d'avis de fusionner tout cela, plutôt sur l'ensemble du batiment ?

ton avis ?

bonne journée
BCNorwich (2025-03-16 07:41:51+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Unfortunately you've made lots of duplicated sections of highways here, which seriously disrupts routing.  Thus I've removed all the duplication while trying to maintain your new information.

If a highway needs amending or correcting it is OSM practice to amend/correct any existing highway. Please do not delete and redraw nor draw a new way on top of an existing way.

Regards Bernard.
literan (2025-03-16 11:15:12+00:00): это не публичные станции зарядки, мы договорились использовать для них тег man_made=charging_station

аналогично, кран в частном доме не является amenity=drinking_water


Я исправлю.
RobJN (2025-03-16 15:20:20+00:00): Я не думаю, что так работает тег amenity. Добавление к нему access=no и bus=yes — это нормально.

I don't think that is how the amenity tag works. Adding access=no and bus=yes on to it is fine.
RobJN (2025-03-16 15:39:33+00:00): Why not use man_made=charge_point: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dcharge_point
literan (2025-03-18 19:38:44+00:00): А я думаю, что тег amenity работает так. Никто не отмечает туалеты в школах  как amenity=toilets или столовые в детских садах как amenity=fast_food + access=private.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:amenity

"amenity=* is the top-level tag describing useful and important facilities for visitors and residents" - я не думаю, что зарядки для автобусов в автобусных парках или на конечных остановках автобусом интересны для visitors and residents
literan (2025-03-18 19:39:52+00:00): >Why not use man_made=charge_point: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dcharge_point

Потому что согласно https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dcharge_point "is used to map the individual physical charging devices (sometimes also known as "dispensers" or "stalls") at charging station sites"

но здесь у нас НЕ charging station
literan (2025-03-18 20:18:05+00:00): https://yandex.ru/maps/-/CHFSU6Ma

я не думаю, что это amenity=charging_station
RobJN (2025-03-19 00:16:44+00:00): man_made=charge_point : "A device for charging electric vehicles". This is exactly what these are. They are also part of a charging station : "A location where an electric vehicle may be charged" even if you are not happy to use the amenity tag. The key words here are device and location.
literan (2025-03-20 14:57:40+00:00): Что ж, я подумал, что если не ставить на группу тег amenity=charging_station, то man_made=charge_point, наверное, можно использовать для этих автобусных зарядок
rskedgell (2025-03-15 16:45:18+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

In the UK, highway=secondary is used for B roads, which Leigham Park Road does not appear to be.

Please see
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Roads_in_the_United_Kingdom
and
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
NeisReview (2025-03-15 18:14:01+00:00): Partly reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/163659108
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:57:28+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401568
NieWnen (2025-03-20 20:21:47+00:00): Please stop doing that. You have already received comments stating that adding details to the name is incorrect.

Tag according to the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station
acauema (2025-03-28 12:38:20+00:00): sorry mr niewnen, i have no intention to harm anyone in my contributions.

i believe you did not get my reasoning behind it, i try to always add it on my contributions, but i might forget sometimes:

"please update the relevant osm fields/tags so charging stations appear on organic maps and similar apps in the most useful way. proper maps are essential for ev drivers with limited range, like myself. we can learn from plugshare, open charge map, ionity, and greenway. read the manifesto on ahoxus.org/osmev for more details on potential actions. feel free! to contact acauema@ahoxus.org and best will be to just good old fashion call me t.me/acauema +48788487949 because i may miss emails and messages."

please let me know if you have any better ideas or some other way to move this forward.
bbqman (2025-03-15 15:37:42+00:00): not a gateway - instead a way tagged as a gate
MxxCon (2025-03-18 03:39:42+00:00): Map vandalism reverted.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163757164
Salyut (2025-03-28 12:44:28+00:00): 请勿以其他地图的标准和规则来等同OSM的绘制。
eggie (2025-03-15 16:14:41+00:00): Dag coolrunnings....
Je tagt access=no en bicycle=yes

Maar wat hebben fietsers dan aan deze route?
Die eindigt weer op een stuk met access=no  Welk bord staat hier vooraan en hoelang gaat de afsluiting duren?
MVG
eggie
MxxCon (2025-03-18 03:36:06+00:00): Vandalism reverted.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163757117
bxl-forever (2025-03-26 15:22:51+00:00): Hello,

We received complaints about data corruption here: it turns out you added "Schoofstraat 2" for the address of this restaurant, whereas the node is located inside the building at "Oude Koornmarkt 11".

Did Spritz relocate to Schoofstraat?  Should that be the case, we can move the node to its correct location.

Please reply, and we will fix the map.
Vegan&neurodivergent (2025-03-26 15:53:54+00:00): Spritz moved locations and is now located at Stoofstraat 2, 2000 Antwerpen. https://www.google.com/search?q=spritz+antwerpen&sca_esv=43a7b294d0c04888&source=hp&ei=ziLkZ9XJJImLkdUP2uGI-AI&gs_ssp=eJzj4tVP1zc0TK_ItSw0TDMyYLRSNagwMU82TjM3TTNNM0tKMUw2tjKoSDUyMEo1M7cwNjNJM0y1NPASKC4oyiypUkjMKylPLSpIzQMA5BQVrg&oq=spritz+ant&gs_lp=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&sclient=mobile-gws-wiz-hp
geisthugo123 (2025-03-17 22:50:03+00:00): Danke für die Aktualisierung.
Falls du am PC mit dem Standardeditor arbeitest kannst du die Gebäudeformen deutlich besser und genauer über den Layer Hesse ALKIS eintragen als über das Satellitenbild
DasOSta (2025-03-18 08:03:00+00:00): Super, vielen Dank für den Tipp werde mir das die Tage mal anschauen!
Bin noch ganz neu dabei und hab die Feinheiten noch nicht so ganz raus ;)
geisthugo123 (2025-03-23 22:54:54+00:00): Ja das mit ALKIS ist halt relativ sinnvoll weil die Gebäudeumrisse ja die Mauerumrisse zeigen sollen und die Dächer ja zum großen Teil überstehen und damit das Gebäude im Luftbild künstlich vergrößern.
Dächer kann man halt auch seperat eintragen wenn man ganz viel Zeit hat.
Branko Kokanovic (2025-03-16 11:38:38+00:00): Zdravo,
Molim te javi se i odgovori na poruke ovde, jer ovo sto dodaješ nije ispravno i biće izbrisano. Hvala
Deronje (2025-03-16 11:42:34+00:00): Pozdrav,

Izvini ako sam ignorisao neke poruke, nisam video mail. Jel me mozes uputiti kako se to radi da mogu ispravno uraditi? 

Hvala
rskedgell (2025-03-15 16:47:31+00:00): ... was correctly tagged as highway=secondary

Actual source used: OS OpenMap Local (April 2024)
kartler175 (2025-03-20 15:19:32+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18840915
This is not a multipolygon. Multipolygons are relations of polygons (closed rings) with at least one member in the role outer. They are intended for surfaces.
dafadllyn (2025-03-22 19:49:46+00:00): Hallo LukeHell

noexit=yes wird verwendet, um darauf hinzuweisen, dass am Ende eines Weges oder einer Strasse für sämtliche Verkehrsteilnehmer kein Weiterkommen möglich ist (besonders, wenn das Wegende nahe eines anderen Wegs ist und man somit vermuten würde, dass ein Kartenfehler vorliegt). Siehe auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:noexit%3Dyes.

Die Stelle https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/720897268#map=19/46.943994/7.409712 ist jedoch weder ein Wegende noch ist dort kein Weiterkommen mehr möglich. (Fussgänger und Velofahrer können und dürfen den Poller passieren.)
Ich habe noexit=yes deshalb wieder durch barrier=bollard + motor_vehicle=no ersetzt.

Gruss, Raphael
tux67 (2025-03-16 15:07:07+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/273308860
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/273310153
Garage, Trafohäuschen oder beides?

Gruß
tux67
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-18 02:18:48+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165093649