piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
gurglypipe (2024-06-20 09:31:21+00:00): Hiya @Olivia Ragone. There’s been some discussion recently on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152889219 about the change of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/262689051 from a stile to a gate, and the addition of locked=yes to it.

Even though it’s tagged as foot=designated, the addition of locked=yes means that software like Komoot no longer wants to route walkers along the path.

Is there still a stile next to the gate? Is the gate actually locked? I’m guessing the answer is yes to both, and the gate is locked to prevent vehicle access? If so, I wonder if the stile needs to be re-added to the map and a little path forked off the track, over the stile and joined up with the path on the north side again, to fix Komoot routing.

I worry there might be other cases like this where gates have (correctly) had locked=yes added to them, but this inadvertently breaks hiking routing.

Interested to hear your thoughts on it! I hope I haven’t misinterpreted the situation, though there’s a good chance I have. :)
gurglypipe (2024-06-21 16:44:53+00:00): Another user has come up with a query to show all gates which are tagged as locked=yes on a footpath: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1Nb7

It seems that this tagging affects a number of the gates on NT routes which have been edited recently. Is this tagging definitely correct?

See further discussion on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152889219

Thanks!
NTTrailsLSE (2024-06-25 09:27:49+00:00): Hello! Thank you for flagging this! You are correct in that the gate at node 262689051 is a 3m wooden gate locked for vehicle use. This was edited as part of a walking survey of the site, but it is quite possible that an adjacent stile was accidentally removed. I have reached out to the local ranger as to confirm and will get back to you as soon as I can! Thanks!
gurglypipe (2024-06-25 09:40:00+00:00): Great, thanks. If you could please update people on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152889219 with what you get back from the local ranger, that would be lovely.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-04-24 10:30:27+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11304609385
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1275550492

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
habi (2025-03-04 11:30:01+00:00): Ciao Aiko
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/194781228/history/3 heisst in der Schweiz ziemlich sicher Dorfstrasse und nicht  Dorfstraße.
Und als Gebäudezufahrten sind diese kleinen Singer wohl auch nicht benannt.
Gruss,
habi
rhtb0 (2024-04-25 10:16:33+00:00): 서산영덕고속도로는 유성JC ~ 회덕JC 구간은 호남고속도로지선과 중첩, 회덕JC ~ 청주JC 구간은 경부고속도로와 중첩, 낙동JC ~ 상주JC 구간은 상주영천고속도로와 중첩되는 구간입니다. 왜 잘못된 노선번호 인가요?
dieterdreist (2024-04-24 16:07:20+00:00): Buonasera Ceseprova,

e benvenuto in OSM, anche se ci sei già da qualche tempo, ma non ci siamo mai incrociati finora. Ti vorrei segnalare questa pagina del wiki, che spiega perché i commenti alle modifiche che carichi sono importanti: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Good_changeset_comments

Saluti e buona mappatura,
Martin
rhtb0 (2024-04-25 10:35:33+00:00): 경부고속도로와 호남고속도로지선과의 중복지정 구간입니다. 그래서 틀리지 않았습니다. 후에 중복 지정이 해제하면 그때 가서 지우면 됩니다.
rhtb0 (2024-04-25 10:36:54+00:00): 중복 지정구간 때문에 서산영덕고속도로입니다. 서로 다른 고속도로라면 번호도 따로, 이름도 따로 지정해놨을겁니다.
tekim (2024-04-24 15:36:36+00:00): Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap!  Thanks for your edit to the map, we appreciate it.  You cited "Google Maps" as the source for this edit, unfortunately when editing OpenStreetMap we are not allowed to use Google Maps due to Google's Terms of Service.
tekim (2024-04-24 15:36:54+00:00): Reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150453890
Frans S (2024-07-24 12:33:58+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
A: Inaccurate mapping.
C: Collecting adjacent buildings and mapped is as 1 building.


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150438594
user_8655426 (2024-04-25 09:39:08+00:00): こんにちは。
この変更セットのように、既存のデータを削除せずに"履歴を残す"のは「グッドプラクティス」です。
変更セットのコメントも詳しく書かれていて、グッドです👍️。
この調子でグッドプラクティスを続けてください。

・グッドプラクティス
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:グッドプラクティス

---

メモ #4184550 の解決、ありがとうございました👍️。
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150439108
tekim (2024-04-24 15:26:20+00:00): Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap!  We are happy that you have decided to join our community of map enthusiasts.   Thank you for your edit to the map - it is only through such edits from people like you that the map is kept up-to-date.  Unfortunately, when editing OpenStreetMap, we are not allowed to use Google Maps (which this edit cited as its source).  This is due to Google's Terms of Service.  You are free to redo the edit using sources that are acceptable for use in editing OpenStreetMap.
tekim (2024-04-24 15:26:39+00:00): Reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150453388
Aim311_ (2024-04-26 21:15:42+00:00): Cześć. Sama nazwa nie wystarczy. Korzystając z edytora w przeglądarce dodałem "dom spokojnej starości" (z lewej strony na górze)
amenity=social_facility
social_facility=group_home
social_facility:for=senior
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-06-14 07:41:32+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1275568300/history - cokolwiek z tego jest w terenie widoczne?
tekim (2024-04-24 15:19:30+00:00): Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap! We are happy that you decided to be a part of our community of map enthusiasts.  Thanks for your edit to the map, and for citing your source.  Unfortunately, when editing OpenStreetMap we are not allowed to use Google Maps due to Google's Terms of Service.   To protect you, the OpenStreetMap project, and users of OpenStreetMap data, the edit will be reverted.  If you have another source that is allowed to be used to edit OpenStreetMap, you are free to redo the edit using only such sources.
mikimapbuilder (2024-04-24 11:30:26+00:00): Edit was reverted due to complex drawing of a simple object
Dave Craig (2024-06-23 15:57:36+00:00): Hi! Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/569708638 really locked? I fixed https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3566536891 which definitely wasn't locked, but I didn't walk through 569708638 so can't be 100% confident. Both are on a main walking route (Cumbria Way) so I wouldn't expect either to be locked.
Thanks!
NTTrailsLSE (2024-06-25 10:07:29+00:00): Hello! Thank you for flagging this! This was edited as part of a walking survey of the site, but it is quite possible that this was accidentally edited or the gate is locked for vehicle use. I have reached out to the local ranger as to confirm and will get back to you as soon as I can! Thanks
NTTrailsLSE (2024-07-15 09:37:27+00:00): Hello! Apologies for the delay, I have just had confirmation from the local Ranger that the gate is not locked so have updated the node. Thanks for flagging.
silversurfer83 (2024-04-24 14:22:59+00:00): Hi :)

wenn du vor Ort warst und dich überzeugt hast, dass am dem Gebäude, welches du hier geändert hast, tatsächlich eine andere Hausnummer steht, als im Kataster vermerkt, dann mach doch bitte eine note mit an das Gebäude, die die Situation für andere erklärt. Sonst kommt morgen jemand und ändert es wegen des ALKIS wieder zurück

cheers
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150441960
Dennis Groppe (2024-04-26 10:14:18+00:00): Hi, danke für den sehr guten Hinweis! Ich habe inzwischen mit unserem Stadtplaner über die Sache gesprochen, ich habe hier scheinbar in ein diffuses Fettnäpfchen getreten, da selbst ihm nicht ganz klar ist, ob nun 20a oder 22a korrekt ist. Ich werde, sobald ich Rückmeldung habe, diese Änderung nochmal ausführlich begründen und die Note hinzufügen (oder die Änderung rückgängig machen, je nachdem). Gruß, Dennis
silversurfer83 (2024-04-26 11:26:51+00:00): Danke für die Rückmeldung.

So lange draußen am Haus eine bestimmte Adresse angeschlagen ist erfassen wir diese. Kataster ist immer nur ein Hinweis auf die Realität am Boden. Von daher wäre eine note am Gebäude gut und falls sich etwas ändert kann es dann auch bei uns geändert werden.

Grüße
silversurfer83
literan (2024-04-24 16:41:53+00:00): криво внесли адреску. Где пробел?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%90%D0%B4%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%B0#%D0%9D%D1%83%D0%BC%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%B2
Đuro Jiří (2024-04-29 20:34:52+00:00): Ha aggiunto duplicato https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11843758117
Rimosso
Patr1k_P (2025-04-21 09:55:50+00:00): nazdar, toto je cesta len pre cyklistov alebo aj auta? 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/22971649
eserte (2024-05-01 18:49:33+00:00): Hi! Ist die Straße mittleweile zu einer "echten" Einbahnstraße geworden? In diesem Fall müsste man nämlich "note: unechte Einbahnstraße!" aus den Daten entfernen.
wies1 (2024-05-02 17:00:22+00:00): Hallo, 

Hintergrund der Änderung war folgender OSM-Hinweis:

"Einbahnstraße von der Dudenstraße in Richtung Monumentenstraße Quelle: https://www.rbb24.de/panorama/beitrag/av24/video-berlin-kreuzberg-einfahrtverbot-ignoriert.html"

Ich habe mir das gerade noch einmal angeschaut - und denke, dass ich da tatsächlich etwas missverstanden hatte und es sich doch um eine "unechte" Einbahnstraße handelt.

Was meinst du zu dem Video?

Ich denke, dann würde es Sinn machen nur den kurzen Bereich bei der Monumentenstraße als oneway=yes zu taggen und ansonsten kein oneway Tag zu machen. Die note sollte man überall drinlassen.

Gruss
wies1
eserte (2024-05-04 15:00:32+00:00): Genau, es ist weiterhin eine unechte Einbahnstraße. Der alte Zustand bei OSM hat das richtig reflektiert, soweit ich weiß, und dieser Zustand sollte wieder hergestellt werden.

Es gibt einen Beschluss des Bezirkamtes Friedrichshain-Kreuzberg von Dezember 2017 (!), diese Straße in eine echte Einbahnstraße umzuwandeln. Das ist aber bislang noch nicht passiert.
wies1 (2024-05-04 17:13:30+00:00): Ich habe daher nun gerade den von mir vorgenommenen Eintrag oneway=yes wieder entfernt. Es ist jetzt nur noch an dem Stück dran, was an die Monumentenstraße angrenzt (dort hatte ich es eh nicht gesetzt, sondern es war schon dran gewesen)
eserte (2024-05-06 06:06:38+00:00): Danke!
tux67 (2024-04-24 14:12:11+00:00): Hallo  W Buehren,

könntest du bitte beim hochladen auch die Quelle deines Wissens angeben um das CS für andere Mapper nachvollziehbar zu machen.
Rein nach Luftbild (und das ist die einzige Quelle, die dein Changeset enthält) , könnte das auch ein Zaunelement sein.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

Gruß
tux67
ManuelB701 (2024-04-24 14:33:48+00:00): Hello Megan,

it appears your changeset made a change in both Japan and Ireland which spans throughout Eurasia.
I recommend you to be careful in your changeset next time.

- Manuel
Metzor (2024-04-24 18:40:45+00:00): Hi Megan,

Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-) 

Some background to Manuel's message:
To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: 

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

 Why? Have a look at the section 
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
literan (2024-04-24 16:43:29+00:00): я бы не убирал тег отеля с пансионата. По сути это загородный отель, просто такое советское название
Руслан Т (2024-04-25 08:46:17+00:00): Привет, восстановил.
Supaplex030 (2024-04-24 15:41:43+00:00): Hallo momabebra, wie in früheren CS bereits bemängelt hast du auch hier wieder eine Einfahrt entfernt, die offenbar noch existiert sowie Bordsteinkanten in falscher Linienrichtung verwendet – habe beides bereits korrigiert.
lg, Alex
Branko Kokanovic (2024-04-25 08:05:02+00:00): Zdravo,
posto vidim da mapiraš ulice, molim te da navodiš izvor podataka. Takođe, prema smernicama za plaćeno editovanje, moraš da u strani profila navedeš za koga radiš (za detalje pogledaj https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines).
---
Hi,
since you are mapping street a lot, please mention source of data. Also, under the guidelines for organised editing, you are required to state in profile who you work for (for details check https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines)
englu (2024-04-25 15:56:22+00:00): Czy wzdłuż tej drogi rowerowej (1028341692) jest jakiś ciąg pieszy? A może ta droga jest dopuszczona dla ruchu pieszych? Biegł tamtędy czerwony pieszy szlak turystyczny, teraz relacja jest przerwana. Jak to wygląda w terenie?
Ronczka (2024-04-25 16:00:41+00:00): Została tylko droga rowerowa. Nie ma żadnego ciągu pieszego.
м1т (2024-04-24 12:17:35+00:00): https://yandex.ru/maps/2/saint-petersburg/?l=stv%2Csta&ll=30.182495%2C59.853646&mode=poi&panorama%5Bdirection%5D=1.191137%2C-2.824038&panorama%5Bfull%5D=true&panorama%5Bpoint%5D=30.182205%2C59.853528&panorama%5Bspan%5D=42.298503%2C15.000000&poi%5Bpoint%5D=30.182193%2C59.853654&poi%5Buri%5D=ymapsbm1%3A%2F%2Forg%3Foid%3D93094541106&source=serp_navig&tab=panorama&z=20
HellMap (2024-04-24 15:29:31+00:00): Sveiki,

Vai pārdēvētajai Pāvila Rozīša ielai tiešām bija domāts `incline=up` gandrīz visā garumā? Tas ir, iela ir ar slīpumu/pāri uzkalnam?

Pieminēšu, ka mainot nosaukumus jāpārbauda, vai nav citas vērtības, kas arī balstās uz šo nosaukumu. Piemēram, šeit palicis `name:etymology=Leons Paegle` + `
name:etymology:wikidata=Q13554453` + `name:etymology:wikipedia=lv:Leons Paegle`. Šie posmi arī bija palikuši nenomainīti piemēram https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1108376327 kā arī viss šis savienojums https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37370774 .

Vēl pieminēšu, ka lielām pilsētas ielām, kur ir adresācija un vecais nosaukums ir daudz izmantots, vajadzētu atstāt veco nosaukumu kā `old_name`, nevis pilnībā nodzēst.

Es šeit izlaboju (izņemot `incline`).

Paldies
woodpeck_repair (2024-04-24 12:37:46+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 150403110, 150403267, 150403852, 150403957.
woodpeck_repair (2024-04-24 12:40:23+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 150399846.
LucasFUB (2024-04-24 15:05:03+00:00): Bonjour, quelles sont les modalités de cette rue scolaire ? Heures d'ouverture/fermeture notamment. La barrière est de quel type ?
pignes (2024-04-25 07:11:11+00:00): Bonjour, 
Il s'agit de deux demi-barrières qui pivotent sur un axe vertical, et qui sont actionnées manuellement. 
Elles sont fermées les jours scolaires (lundi, mardi, jeudi, et vendredi) de 07h30 à 08h20 et de 15h40 à 16h10.
https://www.linspiration-politique.fr/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Ecole-Strasbourg-1024x800.jpg
eggie (2024-04-24 13:11:04+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback Namen toevoegen zonder verdere tagging zal niets doen in OSM  Wat zijn dit voor een bedrijven? De Donia's? Firma Halbertsma State? office=company?

Je geeft aan maxspeed 50 op de trunkroad. Is dat tijdelijk.
Geef svp concreet aan wat je hebt gedaan. 
MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
JeroenHoek (2024-04-24 14:22:45+00:00): De maxspeed=50 zal wel kloppen in deze tijdelijke (ongeveer een jaar) situatie. Als het goed is gaat deze onderdoorgang tegen de zomer open. Deze is uitgesteld door slecht weer (de andere twee zijn al open).
daganzdaanda (2024-05-22 22:02:46+00:00): Hi moobi, 
willkommen bei OSM!
Danke, dass du die Karte in deiner Gegend verbesserst!

Was ist denn https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1275693853 das genau? Die tags sind natural=beach und surface=paved, das passt nicht so recht zusammen (laut Wiki). Ist das vielleicht eine Bootsrampe? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure%3Dslipway

Servus, daganzdaanda
moobi (2024-05-23 08:21:27+00:00): Hi daganzdaanda,
Ja, das ist ein kleiner "Kiesstrand" mit gutem Zugang zum Wasser, aber tatsächlich auch eine Botsrampe. Den Belag der Botsrampe weiß ich gerade nicht mehr.
Der Strand wurde bestimmt nicht zum Baden angelegt, sondern eher für den guten Zugang zum Wasser für die Wasserwacht daneben.

Man könnte den Strand auch entfernen und nur eine Slipanlage (befahrbar) aus dem Wegelchen machen?
daganzdaanda (2024-05-24 11:37:32+00:00): Danke für die Rückmeldung! 
Ja, so wie du es beschreibst wäre das für mich nur ein Weg als Slipanlage (vermutlich für die Wasserwacht?). 
Das Wiki hat als Vorschlag "highway=service" mit "service=slipway", und am letzten Punkt "leisure=slipway". Weil der Weg aber an einen "highway=track" anschließt, würde ich das auch übernehmen, und dann halt auf "service=slipway" verzichten. Die "surface" kann auf jeden Fall noch dazu (pebblestone, compacted, fine_gravel oder gravel??)

Eventuell kannst du den track auch noch nach Verkehrszeichen untersuchen - darf da jeder hinfahren?
eggie (2024-04-24 13:18:45+00:00): Dag Henk Niet zomaar wat doen...  
motor_vehicle=yes is gewoon default op wegen. Dat svp niet gaan toevoegen.
foot=no zou kunnen als er een verbodsbord staat. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-04-24 14:21:21+00:00): Je probleem van de navigatie heb ik even doorgestuurd naar een lokale mapper.
JeroenHoek (2024-04-24 14:27:31+00:00): Ik niet wat nou de navigatie in OSRM tegenhoudt voor auto's. Wellicht worden trunkwegen vermeden voor korte stukjes. Ik heb in ieder geval op deze kruising motorroad=no gezet (geen autoweg). Dat zou kunnen helpen.

Waar voer je de navigatie mee uit Henk?
JeroenHoek (2024-04-24 14:30:43+00:00): Ik heb ook twee turnrestrictions even iets kleiner gemaakt (technisch detail). Deze waren correct, maar lagen over de gehele lengte van de kruising.

Als dit werkt duurt het even voordat navigatiemiddelen de nieuwe situatie oppikken.
JeroenHoek (2024-04-24 16:24:47+00:00): Wat ook nog zou kunnen is dat OSRM niet overweg kan met een weg waarop zowel highway als construction getagd zijn. Dit zijn op- en afritten in aanleg, die tijdelijk als hoofdrijbaan gebruikt worden namelijk. Ik heb die er ook afgehaald nu.
eggie (2024-04-24 18:14:17+00:00): Jeroen ... bedankt.
Groet
eggie
Nour Ayman (2024-04-28 12:29:06+00:00): Correction: Source used was Maxar SecureWatch Imagery 2024-04-18
canfe (2024-05-03 15:35:31+00:00): Perché hai ripristinato la mia correzione?
Ormai sembra che in Italia si adottato il bremen schema che prevede che i buildings abbiano i loro tag e i negozi i loro separati, senza fondere le cose.
I tag dei negozi possono essere messi più o meno dove sono all'interno dell'edificio come capita per le parafarmacie all'interno dei supermercati.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150448091
Đuro Jiří (2024-05-03 16:21:35+00:00): Ciao,
sono d'accordo che i tag dei negozi si mettono più o meno dove sono all'interno dell'edificio, però se uno negozio occupa intero edificio, allora si tag aggiunge all'edificio.
Una domanda ormai sembra, oppure è così?
canfe (2024-05-06 16:24:30+00:00): I think the golden rule of OSM should be respected

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
Đuro Jiří (2024-06-26 19:19:41+00:00): Chiudo scusa, però ho notato che hai mappato negozio con operator Penny Market, però senza nome e edificio con brand:wikidata.
Đuro Jiří (2024-06-26 19:20:16+00:00): *Chiedo
canfe (2024-06-28 06:29:47+00:00): Hai ragione me ne sono dimenticato, ora ho sistemato.
Grazie della correzione.
martinst (2024-04-25 07:33:02+00:00): Hallo GPX3T,
anstatt den Node zu löschen wäre es besser gewesen disused:amenity=restaurant und old_name=* zu verwenden.
Azharul Islam Anik (2024-05-25 17:19:28+00:00): No street-level imagery is available. But the map looks fine. #OMGuru
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150448610
Anonix35 (2024-05-01 18:43:33+00:00): Perché sei cambiato ?
L'autostrada è in costruzione? Pensavo fosse ancora in lavorazione
LockOnGuy (2024-04-25 08:00:00+00:00): You are currently removing orchard landuse  areas from lands with existing orchards. Please avoid deleting the entire area. Instead, consider enhancing the areas without trees while retaining the current landuse where appropriate. Thank you.
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-12 13:09:29+00:00): Thank you for mapping. The mapping looks great and also the changeset comment. Happy Mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150449268
pitfire (2024-04-25 05:43:11+00:00): Hallo Jule_Beuel,
auch hier bringst Du eine verpflichtende Nutzung ein, die so nicht beschildert ist.
Dort, wo das blaue Verkehrsschild "traffic_sign=DE:237" mit weißem Fahrrad angebracht ist, müssen Radfahrende den Radweg benutzen. Ist dieses Schild nicht vorhanden, dürfen Radfahrer*innen auch die Fahrbahn für den Kraftverkehr nutzen – selbst wenn ein Radweg vorhanden ist. Bei diesen Radwegen handelt es sich um sogenannte „andere Radwege“ mit freiwilliger Benutzung. traffic_sign=DE:239,1022-10.
shahenda_ahmed (2024-04-28 13:44:15+00:00): Correction: Source used was Maxar SecureWatch Imagery 2024-04-18
map per (2024-04-24 20:19:54+00:00): Because of review_requested:
This edit looks good, thanks!
LockOnGuy (2024-04-25 08:06:49+00:00): Please don't add personal and spam names. Residential streets in Iraq has only numbers and putting the name of the residents as the name of the street is vandalism, please refine from such edits. Thank you.
UtopiaU (2024-04-25 16:37:06+00:00): Please, how do you know that the names of residential streets in Iraq do not bear the names of local or national figures and the names of martyrs of terrorism, for example?
On the contrary, the names of many streets in residential areas bear the names of people, and I invite you to review your information. You must respect the information added by the citizens of the regions themselves, and this information is documented by the Iraqi local authorities.
LockOnGuy (2024-04-25 17:04:12+00:00): According to the law in Iraq and the naming/number system by the Ministry of planning, The Mayoralty of Baghdad, and the Governorates offices around the county state that the Major roads (territory streets and up) can have names or numbers like "Union Street" or "Street 28" for example, but the residential streets can only have numbers. That is officially by law. If the locals call such street by a different name other than the official numbering, you can add that as loc_name.              
I noticed that you added "names" to some of the streets in this area but I had to remove them as they are descriptive names and not an actual names, for example "the street of the mosque" or "the street of the schools" etc. Please don't name streets like that, instead get the real street name from the gov office if there is no official signs in the street to follow.        
Regards.
lankapuhelin (2025-08-07 11:41:19+00:00): Hei! Name-tagi ei taida olla sopiva näille mökkien numeroille. ref-tagista mökkien numerot jo löytyy, eikö se riitä?
Allison P (2024-04-24 15:51:44+00:00): The street sign is out of date. It's East Teena Street. It was changed in 2009.