piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
dadavid (2025-09-01 12:06:58+00:00): Hi, welcome to osm :) 

please spell the names as they are written locally. Please do not use uppercase everywhere :) 

Greetings

David
DiogoBaptista98 (2026-04-06 01:47:51+00:00): olá, no OpenStreetMap não se devem utilizar descrições no campo name, o valor de name deve conter apenas o nome próprio da via e não informações adicionais, por exemplo name = "em construção" não é adequado, se uma via está em construção essa informação deve ser indicada com etiquetas próprias como highway = construction e construction = footway ou outro tipo de via previsto, garantindo assim que os dados permanecem consistentes e corretamente estruturados. boas ediçoes
paulo106 (2026-04-06 07:42:01+00:00): Obrigado pelas dicas. A minha ideia era deixar um primeiro esboço. Vou tentar fazer melhor nas próximas alterações. Sei que depois de uns dias/semanas, normalmente há correções que são feitas para melhorar a informação. Não justifica os meus erros claro. 🙄 Boas edições também.
dadavid (2025-09-01 11:58:47+00:00): Hi ilbaretto, 

danke für deine Bearbeitung :) Was war denn hier deine Quelle? Wäre toll, wenn du das in Zukunft direkt mit angeben kannst :) 

Viele Grüße und weiterhin viel Spass bei OSM :) 

David
ilbaretto (2025-09-01 19:54:30+00:00): Hallo David,
sorry - normalerweise gebe ich das an. Da habe ich nicht aufgepasst.
Ich bin ein "Eingeborener" hier :-)
Allerdings ganz am Anfang - und tatsächlich auch noch etwas am Probieren...
Grüße
Georg
dadavid (2025-09-01 19:57:41+00:00): Hallo Georg, 

Ja klasse, dann viel Erfolg weiterhin :) gibt’s was, bei dem ich dir vlt helfen kann? :) 

Meld dich gern

Viele Grüße 

David
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-11 12:34:11+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13112280944/history has maxspeed = default that was added in this edit
Is it just less-used duplicate of maxspeed=implicit ?
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxspeed=implicit and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxspeed=default

Is there any reason to not change to more widely used tag?
dadavid (2025-09-01 12:17:01+00:00): Klasse gespotted, vielen Dank!
AndyB_66 (2025-09-11 08:26:38+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
NorthCrab_upload (2025-09-01 13:52:10+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/372563039

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
custodiankeyy (2025-09-01 19:43:28+00:00): Yol gidiş + geliş olarak 1 şerit mi? Hava görüntüsünde öyle gözükmüyor.
herkesicinmaps (2025-09-01 20:57:59+00:00): Tek yön olan kısım tek şerit. Buraları iyi biliyorum araç bile zor sollanıyor.
custodiankeyy (2025-09-01 21:54:59+00:00): Adem Yavuz Caddesi tek yön değil ki. lanes etiketi gidiş + geliş şeritlerinin sayısını temsil eder.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lanes
herkesicinmaps (2025-09-02 07:29:56+00:00): Efendim düzenleme yaptığım kısım tek yön tek şerit lütfen farklı bir değişiklik yapmayın.
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2025-09-04 03:55:33+00:00): @herkesicinmaps Merhaba. Tek şerit olarak işaretlemek istediğiniz yerin gerçekten https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/837163985 olduğuna emin misiniz?

Yol tek yön olabilir fakat tek şerit olduğuna nasıl karar verdiğinizi anlayamadım. Yandex Panorama'dan sokak görüntülerine baktığımda bahsettiğiniz yoldan 4 aracın yan yana geçebileceğini görüyorum. Ümraniye Belediyesi'nin kent rehberinden imar planına baktığımda da planda yol genişliği 30 metre olarak belirtilmiş(mevcut yapılaşma imar planına aykırı galiba, fakat yine de tek şerit denebilecek kadar dar bir yol değil).

https://webgis.umraniye.bel.tr/keos/
herkesicinmaps (2025-09-04 08:16:42+00:00): Ben kendi şahsım olarak ümraniye de ikamet ediyorum şahsi aracım ile de bu caddeden defalarca kez geçtim. Buna resmi kaynaktan veya yandex panorama’dan karar verilmez.  Resmiyette isterse 5 şerit olsun bu cadde de 2 aracın yan yana gitmesi imkansız. Trafik olduğunda bile kimse 2 şerit düzeninde gitmiyor. Bu arada caddenin kenarına park edilen araçları lütfen hesaba katın! Evet resmi kaynaklarda olabilir ama bu şekil yaparsanız insanları yanlış bilgilendirmiş olursunuz. Ben zaten yanlış veya emin olmadığım düzeltmeyi neden haritalara ekliyeyim? Tekrar söylüyorum bu caddeyi kendi aracımla defalarca kez kullanan birisi olarak tek şerit olduğuna kendi şahsım olarak karar verdim.
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2025-09-05 06:55:19+00:00): @herkesicinmaps. Merhaba. Resmi kaynaktan veya Yandex Panorama'dan bakıp, oralara göre karar verelim demiyorum. Yeni kullanıcılar bazen düzenlemek istediği yolu değil de yanlışlıkla başka yolları düzenleyebiliyor. Acaba siz de başka bir yeri düzenlemek istiyorsunuz da yanlışlıkla mı bu sokağı düzenlediniz diye sormuştum. İlgili kaynakları da hangi kaynaklara bakarak böyle söylediğimi belirtmek için yazmıştım. Buraya bilgi eklerken önemli olan gerçekte ne olduğu, planda ne olduğu değil zaten. Kural da öyle: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Map_what's_on_the_ground 

"Ben zaten yanlış veya emin olmadığım düzenlemeyi neden haritaya ekleyeyim" diyorsunuz. Beni ve custodiankeyy'i yanlış anladınız sanırım. Burada kimse sizi, "bilerek yanlış bilgi eklemekle", vandalizmle suçlamıyor. Farkında olmadan yapılan bir yanlışlık mı var diye soruyor.

"bu cadde de 2 aracın yan yana gitmesi imkansız. Trafik olduğunda bile kimse 2 şerit düzeninde gitmiyor. Bu arada caddenin kenarına park edilen araçları lütfen hesaba katın!" diyorsunuz. Bu cümlelerinizden lanes=1 etiketini trafik akışındaki şerit sayısına bakarak yazdığınızı anlıyorum. Yerde yol şerit çizgileri bulunmayan ama bu kadar geniş bir yolda sadece trafik akışına bakarak, lanes=1 etiketi eklemek bana şu sayfalarda anlatılanlara uygun gibi gelmiyor: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lanes 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lanes

Önceki yorumlarınızdan birinde "araç bile zor sollanıyor" demiştiniz. Bu söyleminiz de bana, lanes=1 etiketi kullanımının yanlış olduğunu, eğer lanes= etiketi illa eklenecekse lanes=2 eklenmesi gerektiğini düşündürüyor. (Bu yolu ben düzenleseydim lanes= etiketini hiç eklemezdim.)

Hatta, şu anda her ne kadar Viki'de araç park edilen şeritlerin lanes= etiketinde sayılmayacağı yazsa da bu bile tartışmalı bir konu. Örneğin OpenStreetMap forumundaki şu ankete bakarsanız sürekli araç park edilen şeritleri dahi sayalım diyenler az değil. https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/quick-poll-lane-count/126298

Selamlar
kingkingHK (2025-09-01 13:33:13+00:00): Pretty sure it's "TKO tunnel portal" as in "the tunnel portal on the TKO side"? Hence "tunnel portal" is not capitalised.
Kovoschiz (2025-09-02 08:20:11+00:00): Yes (but removed this for being unnecessary)
BCNorwich (2025-09-02 05:50:10+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Unfortunately your new highway duplicated the existing highway which cause problems with routing. Thus I've reverted this changeset, all is now OK.

Regards Bernard.
jorgeyp (2025-09-01 12:45:16+00:00): Borro este trozo de carril bici porque nunca existió como carril bici independiente, si no como un carril en la calzada. En la vía existente ya está añadido cycleway.
Mashin (2025-09-01 22:37:42+00:00): Hi and thanks for improving OSM!
Just an advice, when you see a business close it better not to delete the whole point, but rather only remove the tag denoting the business (e.g. amenity=restaurant). This way the address is preserved and can be reused when a new business opens at the same location as it often happens. Plus it keeps the history of the place intact.

Cheers.
loadedvegangoat (2025-09-01 23:18:47+00:00): Thats perfect, thank you for the advice! Next time I see that I will keep that in mind. Thank you!
mueschel (2025-09-05 10:14:15+00:00): Hi,
the advertising signs you added got several strange tags. Could you check them and change them to common tags?

date_m = 24.04.2025
display_surface = 18
land_property = Администрация города
luminous = no
operator = ?
opor_count = 1
visibility = 100
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-09-01 13:27:07+00:00): Je me demande si c'est vraiment un mauvais tag... bicycle=dismount  sur un traversier, c'est normal non?
chinook17 (2025-09-01 20:22:37+00:00): À première vue, tu as raison, mais RideWithGPS refusait le routage sur ce traversier. J'ai regardé dans la documentation et effectivement, il faut bicycle=yes.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route%3Dferry#Tags
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ferries
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-09-01 21:22:33+00:00): bizarre! Alors on garde bicycle=yes
raccoss (2025-09-01 15:01:23+00:00): Ma per indicare una bocciofila, non dovresti usare: leisure=pitch + sport=boules?
jptolosa (2025-09-03 05:10:29+00:00): Hola, por favor no eliminar los glaciares de roca (no son morrenas), aunque si es cierto que era necesario corregir el etiquetado: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:geological%3Drock_glacier
Saludos.
dypa (2025-09-02 19:05:45+00:00): Откатил ваши правки связанные с area:highway. Вы не верно используете тег! Этот тег предназначен для микромаппинга, а не для описания объекта.

Своими правками вы ломаете пользовательский опыт потребителей карт в том числе.
Перечитайте еще раз фразу:
"Де-факто пользователи также отмечают места, не обозначенные знаком или разметкой, но явно подходящие для парковки (например, карманы у дороги)." https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:amenity%3Dparking и больше не повторяйте эту ошибку.
Константин Гам (2025-09-02 20:36:13+00:00): Откатывать явно не стоит, ибо изменения различные.

на тему паркингов уж сколько раз твердили миру, что amenity это тег для обозначения услуг. там где люди наставили в расширении проезда тачки в нарушение законов или на газона или на заброшенных площадках аля от снесенного ларька, отношения к услугам стоянки это не имеет

area:highway как раз тег для обозначения площади некого highway, считайте ширины только более сложной формы.
Claudius Henrichs (2025-09-01 13:07:29+00:00): Changeset comment should have said:
"Neue Vorfahrt vor Universitätsklinikum Haus 7"
Source:
Local survey
eggie (2025-09-01 15:55:42+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
silversurfer83 (2025-09-02 14:42:47+00:00): Hi :)

thanks for updating the database when you travel the world.

There are some issues with this changeset:

- https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8402562292 you changed this Brunnen from "amenity=fountain" to "amenity=drinking_water" while someone before you explicitly tagged the fountain with "drinking_water=no". I shall undo this change.

- https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13112411888 is tagged as "historic=monument". Are you shure about that? Please refer to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dmonument and maybe fix this node.

- the least of the issues: Please upload your edits when you leave an area so you don't create bounding boxes that span half a continent. Some users get pretty annoyed by this since they monitor their local area and these huge bboxes spam their feed. It's no biggie, but please keep it mind for the future, ok? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

safe travels and happy mapping
berndw (2025-09-03 12:36:55+00:00): - https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13112384062
Does this phone really still exist? 
In 2023, all Deutsche Telekom's public telephones were switched off
silversurfer83 (2025-09-03 12:50:11+00:00): @bernd, it's possible they still exist. It's just that they don't work anymore and thus need a lifecycle prefix.

But only scrts might tell us more about it, I guess
scrts (2025-09-03 13:26:58+00:00): Hi, thanks for the feedback.

- node 8402562292: this was definitely not marked as non-potable and many people used it as drinking water, I do not think this was wrong.
- node 13112411888: this was a small statue or sculpture, maybe the tagging suggested by OsmAnd was not good? I may change this to historic=memorial in a few hours.
- node 13112384062: there was definitely a public telephone there although I did not try whether it was working.
Patchanka (2025-09-03 18:12:46+00:00): bonjour
merci pour cette mise à jour !
Je vous envoie quelques infos en message privé.
Bonne soirée
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-04 10:09:07+00:00): Hello!

You used
amenity=vending_machineen
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13112434474/history

Have you maybe meant
amenity=vending_machine
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
mstrbrid (2025-09-03 11:00:23+00:00): I understand what you might have intended, but probably more accurate to tag as: amenity=parking, parking=surface, restriction=loading_only, access=private (or =customers if suitable)
joachim-n (2025-09-03 12:59:56+00:00): It's not entirely a parking area -- it's where their lorries load or drop off, and there's also a load of stuff like containers and so on.
mstrbrid (2025-09-03 15:57:06+00:00): Absolutely, so storing the vehicles is secondary to all that, then. =depot reads as if it's the overnight parking for a privately-operated public transport co.
joachim-n (2025-09-03 16:30:55+00:00): Agreed, 'depot' doesn't seem quite right. Calling it parking seems wrong too though.
VictorIE (2025-09-04 01:22:44+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1222688189/history

Has Flannels actually opened in Clerys?
VictorIE (2026-06-17 21:16:31+00:00): Hi again,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13112399743/

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5348523

I don't think there is a car park here. There are just some private foot entrances to the Penneys building. There just might be a delivery entrance and an electrical room also.
fb552 (2026-01-27 15:59:41+00:00): Ciao Bibo, con changeset/177768967 i binari aggiunti sono stati rimossi da OSM.
Come discusso negli ultimi mesi questi binari non esistono più e non restano neppure le tracce della loro passata presenza.
Consiglio, se di interesse, un import su OHM.
mtmail (2025-09-10 12:37:10+00:00): Hallo,
Bei Rahnhorst trägt man üblicherweise nur addr:place=Rahnhorst ein. Meist gibt es keine Strasse mit dem Namen weil der Ort bereits den Namen trägt. Die Hausnummer ist dann dem Ort zugeordnet. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:addr:*
Die Postleitzahl von den Adressen (227386) hat eine Ziffer zu viel.
YomanNH (2025-09-16 09:20:20+00:00): Zniszczyłeś skrzyżowanie. Wycofałem zestaw zmian https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172003344
user_5359 (2025-09-04 16:16:19+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/7932078727 (one of six nodes). What is the mean of the tags 2bis = 2021?
daganzdaanda (2025-10-17 16:32:06+00:00): Hallo nochmal sahealy, 
leider geht der BayernAtlas nicht als Quelle.
siehe auch https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172055801

"TS 8" ist eh kein Name und war ja schon als "ref" eingetragen, also lösch ich den "name" tag einfach.
gogorm (2025-09-02 10:23:22+00:00): Hey, that roundabout is in reality a traffic lights T junction now, I drove through it last week. The road alignment in OSM was correct last week. Satellite imagery is showing a previous temporary layout of the road that was in place to facilitate construction of Intel buildings.
Also, a bunch of bus route relations have been split in two by this changeset.
I think this and osm.org/changeset/171318595 need to be reverted. It can be done manually, or with tools. I'm happy to help with that if needed.
Own Oh (2025-09-02 14:02:32+00:00): Apologies for making a hames of that. Am happy to get your help to reverse these changes. Am only an iD user.
gogorm (2025-09-02 20:16:21+00:00): No worries, I had a go at reverting it with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171377872 .  I made a couple of mistakes during it, so followed up with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171378632 . Looks like it's sorted now!
Own Oh (2025-09-03 09:02:12+00:00): Thank you.
AndyB_66 (2025-09-01 15:00:09+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:%D0%A1%D1%82%D0%B2%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8F_%D0%B3%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%85_%D0%BE%D0%BF%D0%B8%D1%81%D1%96%D0%B2_%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%B1%D0%BE%D1%80%D1%96%D0%B2_%D0%B7%D0%BC%D1%96%D0%BD
Chetan_Gowda (2025-09-03 11:35:35+00:00): Hello, 

Welcome to OpenStreetMap (OSM). It is a collaborative project to create a free, editable map of the real world. 

Please do not delete any roads for visual purpose. Those roads meant for routing/travelling not for beautification. 

Do revert all your edits. Thanks!
B252697 (2025-09-03 11:41:22+00:00): Hi Chetan

Thank you for your message. Appreciate your guidance as I try to figure out how to revert the edits. Thank you!
Chetan_Gowda (2025-09-03 12:43:07+00:00): If you are new to OSM, please use web tool - https://revert.osmz.ru/ to revert the changesets. If you are experienced user, use JOSM add on Plugin "Reverter" 

Let me know if you need help to revert. 
I can do it as well. Thanks!
B252697 (2025-09-03 12:45:53+00:00): Hi Chetan, I think it would be great if you can help to revert. Thank you! It will be my first time using JOSM reverter.
AndyB_66 (2025-09-01 15:00:00+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:%D0%A1%D1%82%D0%B2%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8F_%D0%B3%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%85_%D0%BE%D0%BF%D0%B8%D1%81%D1%96%D0%B2_%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%B1%D0%BE%D1%80%D1%96%D0%B2_%D0%B7%D0%BC%D1%96%D0%BD
AndyB_66 (2025-09-01 14:57:34+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
VictorIE (2026-05-11 22:36:00+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1312824926/

Can the fixme here be retired?
VictorIE (2026-05-11 22:40:49+00:00): Also access=no seems, eh, harsh. Sometimes routing software sees access=no and just doesn't check the rest of the permissions. There are some staff / contractor vans and cars parked at Gate 26. 

Would the following be better?
access=private
bus=designated
psv=designated

cc ramthelinefeed
LateNightTone (2026-05-12 08:28:35+00:00): Thanks @VictorIE, yes the fixme still has some relevance as the satellite imagery hasn't been updated to allow proper checks and alignments, but hopefully if the constrution area can remain in place until imagery is updated, that will serve as enough of an aide-memoire. And yes I agree on the access=private, I'm not sure why it needed to be access=no, unless it was a hangover from construction (some mappers add access=no to highway=construction, I try to remove it as it's unnecessary and results in this sort of thing).
NorthCrab_upload (2025-09-01 18:31:36+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/400451648

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
rskedgell (2025-09-01 16:13:30+00:00): I'm not sure how, but your edit also deleted a residential landuse polygon in Canterbury, UK. Reinstated in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171323526
Nzau (2026-02-28 20:41:14+00:00): Salut pierre_geovelo,
Je ne comprends pas trop ta modif ?

J'ai justement enlevé le bicycle=yes parce qu'il n'a rien à faire là (accès implicite). 
Sinon on peut vite se retrouver à mettre bicycle=yes partout et finir un peu perdu : 
https://api.panoramax.xyz/?focus=pic&map=17/49.328052/1.126607&pic=877cafe0-f088-4266-aa8e-69102d2bbb3c&seq=8bdeba55-b560-4f2c-9652-c31e31aed073&speed=250&theme=default&users=0a5d5370-cc2c-426e-bef7-b9bda806062b&xyz=77.00/0.00/30
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/548687045/history

Du coup, il est préférable de mettre d'autres tags, not. Pour décrire la surface, ou la qualité du revêtement.

Au plaisir d'en discuter,
Enzo
NieWnen (2025-09-02 19:05:51+00:00): Cześć, 
nie ma sensu dodawać takich tagów, bo to wynika z samego cycleway. Zmianę wycofałem.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Poland
Maciek99 (2025-09-02 20:08:57+00:00): Cześć,
Dzięki wielkie za wyjaśnienie, pozdrawiam!
rana7835 (2025-09-01 15:07:32+00:00): nyc crm for photo editing
eggie (2025-09-01 15:57:05+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-09-01 15:59:19+00:00): Feedback Je plakt hier een fietspad op een andere weg. We noemen dat duplicated ways. Dat routeert niet goed. Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=171320795

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-09-01 16:03:34+00:00): Voor nu heb ik er even een fietspad van gemaakt. Ga even na of dat klopt.
eggie (2025-09-01 16:50:43+00:00): parkingspace heb ik verwijderd. Dat teken je in als parkeervakken op een vlak amenity=parking.
Het zijn de vakken zelf.
gr eggie
LordGarySugar (2025-09-03 01:07:21+00:00): Geniunely, what is the point of mass-importing microsoft ai buildings if you don't do any checks for quality????? Look at this social facility https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1426417390 in what world is it acceptable to import a building shape that innacurate from microsoft AI buildings???? You're creating a lot of work for other contributors who are going to have to come along later and clear this mess up!!! Additionally, adding 'clumped' buildings is totally unhelpful, like this one https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1426417426 which should be 5 detached houses, not one massive blob!! Someone's just going to have to delete and redraw a majority of these semidetached and terraced buildings to create a map of usable quality! Have you ever tried using streetcomplete to survey addresses where all you are shown is dodgy building footprints that bear little resemblance to reality??? PLEASE consider the quality of the buildings you are importing, *some* people have standards...
Comino (2025-09-01 16:54:29+00:00): Hi,

In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes".

Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag !
Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead.

For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Merchants#tagging-guidance
and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bitcoin

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
IT entrepreneur and Bitcoin enthusiast
https://btcmap.org/tagger/6794624
VictorIE (2025-09-12 06:25:35+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/531608394

psv.ie appears to be a private busines,s unconnected to the Carriage Office
bestinthewest (2026-03-27 18:45:31+00:00): Pourquoi avoir supprimé l'indication du réseau Tango sur tous ces points ?
Sylv1_Durif (2026-03-27 19:07:02+00:00): Si je m'en rappelle bien, la raison était parce que ces attributs étaient déjà dans la relation parents
Sylv1_Durif (2026-03-27 19:08:17+00:00): Et aussi, pour éviter que lors d'une modification future, il y aurait deux fois plus de chance d'oublier de modifier la seconde valeur
Yui2 (2025-11-04 02:48:05+00:00): 自2025年6月26日7时30分起，九里堤北路(九里堤东路至群星路）、九里堤中路的交通组织调整为机动车双向通行。
fuling09260524 (2025-11-04 07:01:36+00:00): 不就为这个改的吗，这也评论一下，发我个邮件
surveyor54 (2025-09-01 15:41:51+00:00): Korrektur Änderungssatzkommentar:
Naturschutzgebiet "Worpenberger Teiche" eingepflegt.
eggie (2025-09-01 16:07:09+00:00): Dag sewilkens Dit kan juist wel als één vlak worden gemapt.
Ik heb wat aangepast
Gr eggie
eggie (2025-09-01 16:05:41+00:00): Dag sewilkens   Dit zijn eigenlijk geen parkeerterreinen.
Het zijn parkeerstroken. Die tag je als volgt. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:parking%3Dstreet_side

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-09-01 16:08:33+00:00): Als voorbeeld even aangepast met street_side