piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Jelv (2026-01-10 14:43:57+00:00): Dankjewel voor de opmerking. Branch heb ik ondertussen ook ontdekt, ik zal hem meenemen voor ketens waar het voor van toepassing is.
totera (2026-01-02 23:33:17+00:00): Ciao DnaX, perché modificare government da social_security a social_welfare? Quest'ultimo non è documentato sul wiki, mentre in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:government=social_security si dice "A state social security institution that provides benefits to insured persons. This tag is to be distinguished from state welfare institutions that are provided independently of prior payments into an insurance scheme", che corrisponde proprio al sistema contributivo a cui com'è noto l'INPS è passata da tempo.
DnaX (2026-01-02 23:52:13+00:00): Ciao, ne ho discusso tempo fa qui:

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/inps-inail-e-motorizzazione/126874
totera (2026-01-03 00:35:21+00:00): Ho riportato l'obiezione lì
SomeoneElse (2026-01-04 11:27:41+00:00): Hello,
Just wondering - do you have any idea how NCN61 gets across the gap at https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/31640#map=17/51.509457/-0.549799 ?
Best Regards,
Andy
FatGav (2026-01-04 12:05:10+00:00): Yes, it uses the green bridleway that is currently there. This was always the route, never the path I removed. That path was there once, not now thought as it's Very overgrown now
SomeoneElse (2026-01-04 13:03:47+00:00): So I guess you just need to add https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1299073967 to the NCN61 relation?
SomeoneElse (2026-01-04 13:10:50+00:00): (as it's not obvious how to add to a relation in iD)
Click on the bit of bridleway https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1299073967/history in iD, scroll down to the bottom at the left hand side, in "choose a parent relation" type in 31640 (you can get that number from the relations modified in this changeset below).  Then hover over the newly added relation with the mouse so that it highlights it, and you can see that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25690340/history needs splitting in two and the northern bit removing from the relation as well.
SomeoneElse (2026-01-04 13:11:50+00:00): Also a similar thing needs to happen to the Colne Valley Trail https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12772894#map=17/51.509518/-0.549436 so that that doesn't have a gap in it.
FatGav (2026-01-05 07:41:47+00:00): Thanks for the description of how to do it Andy, I wouldnt have been able to do it without that.
It should all be done now.
Cheers,
SomeoneElse (2026-01-05 23:03:33+00:00): Thanks - that's fixed it: http://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeRelation?relationId=31640
NeisBot (2026-01-03 07:41:10+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13272714083 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Winery in Barboursville VA"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-17 16:34:58+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177343222
NeisBot (2026-01-03 07:42:17+00:00): 🌍 Willkommen bei OSM, tatuetata.
Danke für deine Beiträge!

Um die Zusammenarbeit zu erleichtern und anderen zu helfen, deine Änderungen zu verstehen, ist es am besten, wenn du eine kurze Beschreibung der von dir vorgenommenen Änderungen hinzufügst. Klar formulierte Kommentare helfen der Community, deiner Arbeit zu folgen und bessere Rückmeldungen zu geben. Du findest Tipps zum Schreiben guter Kommentare hier[1].

✅ Hier ist ein Beispielkommentar basierend auf deinen Karteneditierungen: "Hausnummer 27 hinzugefügt"
(Auto-translation)
---
🌍 Welcome to OSM, tatuetata.
Thanks for contributing!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

✅ Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added house number 27"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment #NoComment
SomeoneElse (2026-01-03 12:31:45+00:00): Just for info, there's an extra "n" in the Enniskillen that is https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20040754 - "Ennniskillen"
eggie (2026-01-03 08:25:47+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Sylabowy Kot (2026-01-03 21:15:33+00:00): No. BDOT was not a source of demolishion. 'demolished' is a prefix for every tag of such a building and I was aware of the tagging.
mueschel (2026-01-04 08:27:09+00:00): If that's not the source, the tag should not be added. On the original building the source was correctly given in the changeset. When you set it to 'demolished', you added the tag, which you claim was not the source - which means it's wrong and shouldn't be there.
giopera (2026-01-02 18:37:06+00:00): This is a changeset to remove malformed and duplicated data from an import done without a guide and probably not from an import account, please contact the Local Italian group user Jnp624

Also I'm sorry for not using a dedicated account but I forgot to switch account :(
giopera (2026-01-02 18:37:15+00:00): This is a changeset to remove malformed and duplicated data from an import done without a guide and probably not from an import account, please contact the Local Italian group user Jnp624

Also I'm sorry for not using a dedicated account but I forgot to switch account :(
giopera (2026-01-02 18:37:21+00:00): This is a changeset to remove malformed and duplicated data from an import done without a guide and probably not from an import account, please contact the Local Italian group user Jnp624

Also I'm sorry for not using a dedicated account but I forgot to switch account :(
giopera (2026-01-02 18:37:27+00:00): This is a changeset to remove malformed and duplicated data from an import done without a guide and probably not from an import account, please contact the Local Italian group user Jnp624

Also I'm sorry for not using a dedicated account but I forgot to switch account :(
giopera (2026-01-02 18:37:33+00:00): This is a changeset to remove malformed and duplicated data from an import done without a guide and probably not from an import account, please contact the Local Italian group user Jnp624

Also I'm sorry for not using a dedicated account but I forgot to switch account :(
giopera (2026-01-02 18:37:40+00:00): This is a changeset to remove malformed and duplicated data from an import done without a guide and probably not from an import account, please contact the Local Italian group user Jnp624

Also I'm sorry for not using a dedicated account but I forgot to switch account :(
Rainero (2026-03-29 15:16:06+00:00): Revert changeset/180589220
wegen nicht zulässiger Quelle (Bayernatlas).
Baloo Uriza (2026-01-05 15:34:54+00:00): If these are long thin ramps, then trunk_link is appropriate.  I'm curious why these were changed to secondary.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176757391
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-01-08 16:53:41+00:00): Hej! Po pierwsze to witam i pozdrawiam

Dodatkowo - czemu kasowałeś drzewa np. tam gdzie teraz jest https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1463763745 ? Czy ich lokalizacje/dane błędne były?
Deftax (2026-01-15 17:55:18+00:00): W tym miejscu jest dosyć duże zagęszczenie drzew i praktycznie niemożliwe byłoby (tak jak próbowałem wcześniej) zaznaczyć dokładnie pojedyncze drzewa - bardziej precyzyjnie było (wg mnie) zaznaczyć jako obszar z drzewami. W podobnych miejscach, gdzie zaznaczyłem tak drzewa, sytuacja jest analogiczna.
Pozdrawiam
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-01-18 17:03:08+00:00): dzięki za odpowiedź, brzmi sensownie - zwłaszcza jak kasowałeś to co dodałeś
Fizzie-DWG (2026-01-02 22:40:39+00:00): DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176763865
Fizzie-DWG (2026-01-02 22:40:40+00:00): DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176763865
Fizzie-DWG (2026-01-02 22:40:41+00:00): DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176763865
Epic Story Media (2026-01-15 20:28:45+00:00): Nice
Jarek 🚲 (2026-01-15 01:45:12+00:00): Hello,

Please do not add legal descriptions as laneway names in Toronto. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Toronto#Laneways
NeisBot (2026-01-03 07:41:13+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13263824701 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "coffee shop in Glasgow MO"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-17 16:34:58+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177343223
divaddivag (2026-01-03 10:17:41+00:00): Salu karr4s, Bonne année à toi! J'espère que 2026 te remplira de bonheur et qu'OSM en profitera comme c'est le cas depuis quelques années déjà! De mon côté, j'ai mis les boites à livres sur ma liste des petites bricoles à jardiner ou enrichir en passant. Mes 2 changesets récents ont pour but d'identifier les objets à visiter en priorité, dans l'esprit cela donne ceci:  https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2ibN . Dans ce sens, la BaL de Tilly n'est pas la première urgence même si je dois avoir la photo fixe (c'est mieux je pense) quelque part puisque j'ai filmé la piste cyclable il y a quelques semaines.
 Cheers!
 David
karr4s (2026-01-03 10:22:07+00:00): Salut David et bonne année à toi aussi. :)
J'ai vu les dernières photos de boîtes que tu as publié : c'est génial ! Pour la boîte de Tilly-sur-Seulles, j'en parlais justement à un amis qui fait pas mal de route pour son travail dans ce secteur et qui m'a confirmé qu'elle était bien présente mardi dernier (d'où la modification dans la foulée).
Je garde précieusement la requête. Si tu en as une similaire pour tes TOC, n'hésite pas à me l'envoyer : si c'est des éléments qui sont dans ma zone, j'y ferai attention.
@+
divaddivag (2026-01-09 14:00:16+00:00): Hello, mes premiers pas sur umap: http://u.osmfr.org/m/1341726 . Il y a quelques bricoles à affiner surtout j'aimerais que le code couleur soit basé sur la différence entre la date du jour et le tag 'check_date' plutôt que l'année comme actuellement car c'est généré dynamiquement avec Overpass. Les idées et améliorations vont venir avec le temps. Il ne reste qu'à allumer du vert!

Pour les mémoriaux, il faut que je fasse une passe sur plusieurs interco pour identifier les manques comme pour CC Val ès Dunes: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2fX9 . Le truc sympa c'est ce qui est 'oh punaise je n'avais fais attention à cette plaque' qu'il faut photographier et ajouter dans WC et/ou OSM comme tu avais fais à Étavaux. Comme les BaL, c'est le coté création de données qui est aussi sympa. 
Cheers! D
NeisBot (2026-01-03 07:41:14+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13278217400 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Diesel vehicle repair shop in Harrodsburg KY"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-17 16:34:59+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177343224
nickvet419 (2026-01-20 20:20:38+00:00): Your resent changes to Ohare ORD are not correct. The airport is under ongoing construction and many changes have been made to the layout the you changed or reverted to old imagery.
snake21 (2026-01-22 03:01:15+00:00): Oh jeez, that's unfortunate. How can I undo this?
nickvet419 (2026-01-22 04:39:08+00:00): no need, I already did the reverts.
snake21 (2026-01-22 04:44:49+00:00): Thanks and sorry for the trouble!
eggie (2026-01-03 08:30:15+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  Lijkt me prima zo.
De standaardkaart laat helaas geen rendering zien met craft=  ..
andere kaarten weer wel. https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/51.815418/4.663817&layers=H
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
literan (2026-01-03 14:48:17+00:00): зачем вы вандалите? получите блок если будете продолжать
calvinficenec (2026-01-02 20:02:51+00:00): This is my first time editing OSM, please let me know how I'm doing!
chath_tsu (2026-01-02 21:13:16+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM! You did a very good job with your first edit. The only minor issue I could see is that phone numbers should have the international dialing code in front - so +1 for the US. I've gone ahead and added that. Thank you and happy mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176759088
stasiu512 (2026-01-07 01:25:39+00:00): Cześć, co tu się wydarzyło? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/442948692
stasiu512 (2026-01-07 01:28:25+00:00): Chyba mała pomyłka przy pracy, poprawiłem tą linię na trunk w tej zmianie - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176925181
Pozdrawiam:D
d3mol3k (2026-01-07 15:26:58+00:00): Dzięki serdeczne tak jak napisałeś drobna pomyłka przez nieuwagę ;(
Rubenke (2026-03-13 14:20:24+00:00): Dit is toch helemaal niet handig qua routing. Zo klopt er niks van
jj000 (2026-03-13 14:50:04+00:00): Goede argumenten ook. Dan wijzig je het zelf toch? Succes
Max-Kritic (2026-01-03 08:31:25+00:00): Salut,

Ces maisons existent depuis 2022 environs. J'attendais la mise à jour du  cadastre qui tarde à arriver sur Arras. En attendant la mise à jour du cadastre sur Arras, j'ai intégré des grands immeubles dans OSM comme la Résidence Németto avec des tages "Fixme "Bâtiment à refaire avec le cadastre mis à jour"

Les premières maisons ont été importées en 2021 sauf les garages. 

Ok pour la copie avec l'Ortho 2024, mais il faut indiquer la source. De plus, il y a mieux que l'Ortho 2024. Le PCS Raster Ouvert. Tu connais ? C'est 4 fois plus précis comme image. Sur les Hauts-de-France, c'est disponible aussi depuis 2024. J'utilise maintenant cette couche dans JOSM.

J'ai recopié les deux dernières maisons (n° 25-27) avec celles intégrées en 2021. Et j'ai mis la source PCS Raster Ouvert au lieu de "cadastre-dgi-fr source : Direction Générale des Finances Publiques - Cadastre. Mise à jour : 2021" et un tage fixme. 

Que pense-tu de cette solution. Il faudrait aussi que je trouve plus d'outil pour les bâtiments dans JOSM (Greffon). 

https://www.geo2france.fr/portal/pcrs_raster_regional
https://geoservices.ign.fr/pcrs
https://pcrs.beta.gouv.fr/suivi-pcrs
Vermandois (2026-01-03 16:14:40+00:00): Salut,

Désolé de t’avoir coupé l’herbe sous le pied !

Je pensais que l’Ortho suffirait au moins pour une première indication, et je ne pensais pas que quelqu’un attendait la mise à jour du cadastre.

Pour la suite, c’est comme tu veux : tu peux (ou je peux, si tu préfères) ajouter un tag ‘fixme’ aux maisons que j’ai ajoutées hier. 
Ou encore, si tu préfères qu’il n’y ait rien en attendant le cadastre, tu peux tout effacer, pas de problème.

Sur les différents points :

- la source des modifications, je l’indique dans le changeset, pas sur les bâtiments individuels

- le PCRS Raster ouvert, non, je n’avais jamais essayé ; le gain de précision est impressionnant, je vais l’utiliser maintenant, merci !

- pour le traitement des bâtiments avec des greffons dans JOSM, tu penses à quoi par exemple ?
calvinficenec (2026-01-02 20:22:07+00:00): I'm new to editing, please let me know how I'm doing.
NeisBot (2026-01-03 07:41:16+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13427422104 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Math tutoring center"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-01-17 16:40:22+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/176773295
Thanks @user_5359
os-emmer (2026-02-22 20:20:41+00:00): Hallo letihu,
ich bin grade über einige addr:country=Ostlutter gestolpert, z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8255133136
Kannst du das noch mal prüfen?
letihu (2026-02-23 13:29:50+00:00): Die Adressen waren schon vorhanden. Ich habe den Ort nachgetragen. Stimmt was nicht?
os-emmer (2026-02-23 17:06:44+00:00): "country" bedeuted auf deutsch "Land". Bei Adressen in Deutschland müsste das addr:country=DE sein. Oder hat das abtrünnige Ostlutter sich für unabhängig erklärt? ;)

Ich bin mir nicht ganz sicher, ob es addr:city=Ostlutter oder addr:city= "Lutter am Barenberge" und "addr:suburb=Ostlutter" sein müsste. Ich tendiere zu letzterem.
9_tab (2026-04-09 20:15:01+00:00): This now shows up on https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/addr%3Acountry#values fairly high.

If you need help fixing them, I can do it for you.
letihu (2026-04-10 20:11:06+00:00): Ich hab mir das noch mal angeschaut. Da hab ich wohl einen Fehler gemacht.
Ich hoffe meine Korrektur hat den Fehler beseitigt.
Klasse, dass  os-emmer die Fehler gefunden hat.
NeisBot (2026-01-03 07:41:17+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/12762691310 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Social Security Disability lawyers office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-01-17 16:40:22+00:00): 🗑️ Element deleted by https://osm.org/changeset/176761237
Thanks @DW SSD STUART
Baloo Uriza (2026-01-05 15:35:24+00:00): This camera got added in the middle of a street.  In order to provide a more accurate location, can you provide a photo or description of where the camera is located?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176761138
limes11 (2026-01-02 21:43:38+00:00): Hallo, 

das sieht in der Form nicht korrekt aus. Du hast zwei Gebäude übereinander gezeichnet. Das hier

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1463788356#map=19/49.983126/7.538153&layers=N

sollte kein Gebäude sein, oder  ?

Der Bäckerei-POI liegt nun genau auf der Grenze, der müsste dann wohl ein Stück verschoben werden

Viele Grüße
Hendrik Helsper (2026-01-02 23:07:39+00:00): Hallo,
Ja du hast recht. Das sollte eigentlich ein shop= sein. Die falsche Lage der Bäckerei ist mir auch aufgefallen, ich hatte nur keine Zeit mehr, das zu korrigieren. 
Lg
fghj753 (2026-01-02 21:32:58+00:00): 11 cameras to add:
Tartu mnt (suund Sikupilli) - Peterburi mnt -> https://ristmikud.tallinn.ee/last/cam009.jpg
Tartu mnt - Peterburi mnt -> https://ristmikud.tallinn.ee/last/cam084.jpg
Peterburi mnt (suund Narva) - Rahu tee -> https://ristmikud.tallinn.ee/last/cam098.jpg
Pae tn - Peterburi tee -> https://ristmikud.tallinn.ee/last/cam115.jpg
Peterburi tee - Majaka tn -> https://ristmikud.tallinn.ee/last/cam116.jpg
Kadaka tee-Akadeemia tee(linnast välja) -> https://ristmikud.tallinn.ee/last/cam121.jpg
Pronksi tn - Raua tn (suund Ahtri tn) -> https://ristmikud.tallinn.ee/last/cam140.jpg
Reidi tee - Ahtri tn -> https://ristmikud.tallinn.ee/last/cam177.jpg
Rannamõisa tee - Pikaliiva tn (suund Tabasalu) -> https://ristmikud.tallinn.ee/last/cam226.jpg
Niine tn- Põhja pst -> https://ristmikud.tallinn.ee/last/cam232.jpg
cam241 -> https://ristmikud.tallinn.ee/last/cam241.jpg
Meeliz (2026-01-02 21:27:07+00:00): The line 2 (Mõigu > Resisadama A-Terminal) was removed, it no longer exists as it is replaced by the Old Harbour Tram. The line's unique bus stop was marked as disused yet kept for future reference.
Meeliz (2026-01-02 21:29:12+00:00): I have also updated the information and translation of some other nodes (most notably, the airport's node).
Meeliz (2026-01-02 21:36:37+00:00): The issue is that the new bus line 2 is not on the map. It is now Mõigu > Balti Jaam. 

https://transport.tallinn.ee/#bus/2/b-a/13601-1
Meeliz (2026-01-02 21:40:25+00:00): I'm gonna create the new bus line.
Meeliz (2026-01-02 22:03:40+00:00): Will restore it and remove the disused bus stop and update info
Joseph R P (2026-01-03 22:48:09+00:00): Hello—what is your reasoning for restoring trunk road classification for some of the roads here?
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-01-04 03:04:09+00:00): You commented all those changesets with "Downgraded trunk stub[s] to primary." Well, I decided to restore them to trunk roads as long as they didn't form any "stubs" or anything. The way I re-upgraded them here ensures that there will be a cohesive network, from what was likely the intent of the original user(s) who upgraded them in the first place.
Joseph R P (2026-01-04 03:15:23+00:00): These trunk routes have been around for a while as far as I know and are definitely just leftovers from when all expressways and other "expressway-ish" arterial roads were tagged as trunk roads. Put together, Alvernon Way, Route 210, and Kino Pkwy don't really form a coherent route, especially for non-local long-haul traffic or intracity commuters. They pretty much all serve the same purposes as roads like Broadway, Speedway, or Campbell do, just at different construction standards.
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-01-04 03:57:06+00:00): Okay, I'll be changing these back shortly. (I haven't been to Tucson, but since its state is near mine, I'd assume similar conditions, such as those for roads.)
BubbaJuice (2026-02-12 03:46:06+00:00): 4 years ago me and another mapper made these trunk based on traffic numbers. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109601263 & https://pag.public.ms2soft.com/tcds/tsearch.asp. These roads are built up because they carry a large amount of cars. In our proposal, these were made trunk to distinguish between major arterials (tagged as primary) and these high-capacity, built up roads. I'm hoping we can shift these back to trunk but I'm open to discussion.

Thanks,
BubbaJuice
Joseph R P (2026-02-13 15:48:15+00:00): One of the focal points of the 2021–onwards reclassification of trunks roads was avoiding classification highways as trunk based solely on AADT and/or their physical construction and rather their importance in the system, with emphasis on long-haul connectivity. These roads only serve Tucson as major thoroughfares from the suburbs towards Downtown and I-10, which is essentially the main function of other urban primary roads, whereas a trunk road would play a role in serving other population centers, like Route 77 does.
BubbaJuice (2026-03-16 16:51:14+00:00): Despite this, I feel like physical construction is still an important part of road classification. Route 210 & Alvernon feature several grade separated interchanges in my opinion.