piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
hrhino (2023-07-05 13:03:41+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OSM!

A few points:
- highway=residential denotes "roads that provide access to, or within, residential areas but which are not normally used as through routes"... a driveway is a lesser classification and is usually tagged with highway=service and service=driveway. (You can see the various kinds of highways on the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway)
- Likewise, regarding way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/245204743, which you changed from highway=path to highway=residential, I'm looking at (fairly recent) satellite imagery, and are you sure that that's a road which cars can follow? Even if so, residential roads are usually named; I'd say that if it's not named it's still a highway=service only.
- Finally, you don't need to use a name=* tag to describe what something is (referring to the Driveway here, the Walkway introduced in changeset 138126681, and the Driveway introduced in changeset 138128366); you can read more on the wiki here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions

I've removed the names on those ways and changed all but https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/245204743 to highway=service; this is just for your information as you keep mapping. Thanks for contributing to OSM!
Aleksey Gorelikov (2023-07-05 03:10:44+00:00): Changed road name to "Shane Creek Lane" according to local user request   #mapbox_contribute
phoenixsaigon1698 (2023-07-06 00:57:39+00:00): Hi bạn, bạn edit lại chưa đúng format tiêu chuẩn rồi. lỗi #1 relation with multiple restriction values
lỗi 2 member 806265451 without role
vnhoangha (2023-07-06 01:39:45+00:00): Cảm ơn bạn đã hướng dẫn, nhờ bản sửa lại giúp mình cấm rẽ trái đối với ô tô nhé.
phoenixsaigon1698 (2023-07-06 01:48:46+00:00): Ừa không có gì bạn. Mình chỉnh lại rồi.
mavl (2023-07-05 03:25:47+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 138087173, 138087378, 138087640, 138125938.
user_5359 (2023-07-05 05:44:55+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I remove your SEO SPAM entry (mostly foreign keys).
Kovoschiz (2023-07-05 05:37:20+00:00): `escalator=yes` means the feature has escalators, similar to `elevator=` and `wheelchair=` . It should not be replaced with `conveying=` , and absolutely not `=steps` .
minghong (2023-07-05 06:41:26+00:00): Those were suggested edits by iD. Please update them if necessary.
mavl (2023-07-05 06:27:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138132374 where the changeset comment is:  The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the edit war].
mavl (2023-07-05 06:27:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138132374 where the changeset comment is:  The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the edit war].
mavl (2023-07-05 06:27:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138132374 where the changeset comment is:  The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the edit war].
mavl (2023-07-05 06:27:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138132374 where the changeset comment is:  The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the edit war].
mavl (2023-07-05 06:27:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138132374 where the changeset comment is:  The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the edit war].
mavl (2023-07-05 06:27:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138132374 where the changeset comment is:  The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the edit war].
Dimitar155 (2024-12-21 08:58:44+00:00): Hey Zh9567,

Please choose a single scheme for the houses. Either building=house + house=something or building=something. It's not advisable to use both schemes on the same object.

Also note that house=terrace is for the row of houses while house=terraced is for the individual houses in each row,

Happy holidays,
Dimitar
mavl (2023-07-05 06:27:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138132374 where the changeset comment is:  The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the edit war].
mavl (2023-07-05 06:27:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138132374 where the changeset comment is:  The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the edit war].
eggie (2023-07-05 09:57:06+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
user_5359 (2023-07-05 05:43:07+00:00): Welcome to OSM! II remove your SEO SPAM entry (mostly foreign keys).
burrscurr (2023-07-07 14:41:53+00:00): Hallo rf8791,

in dem Changeset sind sowohl die Gebäude als auch die Eingänge mit der Adresse getaggt. Ich habe eben noch mal im Wiki nachgeschaut, und das scheint nur bei Gebäuden mit mehreren Adressen/Eingängen empfohlen zu sein (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses#How_to_map). Außerdem sind die Nummern nicht ganz korrekt (66, 5-7 = 5,6,7 != 5,7) Kannst du das bitte in Ordnung bringen? Danke!
NorthCrab_upload (2023-07-05 06:00:13+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10613034526
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1107858698

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Piotrich (2023-07-05 07:01:54+00:00): Ok poprawiam
M_Gaugg (2023-07-12 13:59:06+00:00): Bis auf Isser Optik gibt es die anderen Betriebe nicht mehr
Map-Peter (2023-07-06 21:34:20+00:00): Hello bathines,
 
that: https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=138131793 is not how it is done in OSM -> use: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix instead of delete the highway.  
Because the highway is still visible on many aerial images.
 
So in this case only change "highway=service" to "abandoned:highway=service" and it will not be shown on the map but is a reminder in the editor to the next mapper to not draw it in again because he thinks this highway is missing in OSM.
bathines (2023-07-07 14:17:24+00:00): Hello Map-Peter,

Thank you for reviewing the edits and making the necessary corrections. I relied on Bing aerial imagery and Mapbox imagery while making the edits, but I couldn't find a clear road. As a result, I deleted the service road. However, moving forward, we will try to change the tag from "highway=service" to "abandoned:highway=service" instead of deleting the road, in order to prevent similar errors from happening again. 

Regards,
bathines
elgolfo (2023-07-06 06:16:52+00:00): Guten Morgen,
willkommen bei OSM.
Du hast aus dem gesamten Gebäude deinen Firmensitz gemacht. Besser ist in so einem Fall ein einzelner Punkt. 
Habe es angepasst: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11029458989
Falls du Fragen hast, kannst du in dem Änderungssatz auf der OSM-Seite kommentieren (Link dazu unten in der Mail).

Beste Grüße
Moritz
mavl (2023-07-05 06:27:35+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 138129464, 138129503, 138129529, 138129547, 138129554, 138129570, 138129599, 138129606, 138129612, 138129640.
nevw (2023-07-05 07:33:10+00:00): Have you mispelt the name
Anthony2106 (2023-07-05 08:31:34+00:00): yes its "Healthy Ocean Food"
Anthony2106 (2023-07-05 08:35:09+00:00): how can I fix it?
nevw (2023-07-05 09:23:15+00:00): Looks good now, thanks
Anthony2106 (2023-07-05 09:25:59+00:00): are you saying thanks because you were gonna edit it and i just did it
nevw (2023-07-05 10:54:12+00:00): I don’t remember anymore, but thanks for fixing up the map so promptly
Anthony2106 (2023-07-05 10:58:10+00:00): yeah na its fine, its fun
adrianojbr (2023-07-05 14:24:16+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138133561
mikini (2023-10-03 14:30:54+00:00): Hejsa,

Tak for dine bidrag. Du havde dog fået lavet nogle lidt sjove relationer i dette redigeringssæt. 

Efter din redigering bestod [Munken SFO][1] hhv. [Fritidsklub][2] hver af en relation med to veje, hvoraf den ene var fælles.
Dette er for så vidt ikke forkert (og blev også renderet rigtigt på kortet), men det er unødvendigt i den situation og gør data mere kompliceret og sværere for mappere at overskue og redigere efterfølgende.

To almindelige veje kan sagtens dele de samme punkter, uden at en relation er påkrævet. Kun hvis der er information der skal tagges på det delte vejforløb giver det mening at lave den som en vej til at bære dette, og indføre de overordnede elementer som relationer der indeholder denne. Se også den lidt mere langhårede dokumentatoin [om relationer i wikien][3].

Jeg tænker at det måske er iD-editoren (standardværktøjet på hjemmesiden) der har forårsaget dette. Den kan nogle gang godt finde på automatiskt at lave en relation når man deler en vej i punkter der anvendes af flere veje. Det skal man lige være opmærksom på, og vurdere om det giver mening i det enkelte tilfælde.

Jeg har tilladet mig at fjerne relationerne og genetablere de to som veje i [changeset 142101192][4].

-- 
God mapning,
Mikkel

[1]: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/443547649/history
[2]: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/777916748
[3]: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation
[4]: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142101192
WebbieDK (2023-10-05 06:27:46+00:00): Hej Mikkel

Tak for infoen. Jeg kan godt huske det område drillede lidt og jeg var inde og rette til et par gange. Men troede jeg havde fået styr på det til sidst. Men åbenbart ikke :-)

Jeg lærer hele tiden nye ting så det er super fedt. Tak fordi du fik rettet til.

Hilsen
Thomas
tordans (2023-07-07 06:20:58+00:00): Es fehlt noch das „Gehweg“ an https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1000303428 oder?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138134550
Supaplex030 (2023-07-07 09:47:20+00:00): Oh ja, danke, habe ich ergänzt.
rskedgell (2023-07-05 08:41:53+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for spotting this/updating the map. It can take a while for these changes to propagate to routing software, sometimes of the order of weeks.

It might work a little better if you add the gate as a node (point) as close to where it is actually located, tagged with:
barrier=gate + access=private + locked=yes

Removing the highway=service tag unfortunately means that OSM now thinks it has a very long gate with a lot of access tags.

If you'd like any help with this, please let me know.
rskedgell (2023-07-05 09:49:40+00:00): No need for you to do anything here - another user has already edited it.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138139248
GEO ECLA (2023-07-06 08:31:56+00:00): Bonjour Julien,
Il s'agit d'un composteur ?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138134619
Frans S (2023-08-12 10:41:34+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
 A new mapper !  Welcome. We hope you will enjoy this mapping as well.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings need to be improved to meet the quality standards of HOTOSM.
A: C: Not accurately drawn and squared.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document for more info)



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138135109
literan (2023-07-05 20:02:22+00:00): на сливах растут яблоки??

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4879567104  и окрестные точки
solenoid jam (2023-07-06 02:50:42+00:00): Отлично, сейчас исправим!
Patrickov (2023-07-05 08:41:25+00:00): This is what another contributor said after I shared this changeset on Discord:  "Just bc you can't find it among the first 5 google results doesn't mean it doesn't exist"

Admittedly that's guy's rather rude, but I suppose you have surveyed the area to come to this conclusion?
minghong (2023-07-05 08:48:30+00:00): It is not just not found in "top 5". It is no results. For informal place names that are used by other (especially hikers), I do keep them. If the name did appear in historical documents but not used now, I do keep them as well (but renamed to was:name or old_name).
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-07-05 16:39:09+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/707104229/history

What about islets? Whether they are described at web does not really matter (maybe this one actually does not exist but its deletion should be done with other description)
minghong (2023-07-06 00:23:35+00:00): Those were drawn based on wrong satellite images, which were actually a big wave. If you switch satellite images, there were just water, not even submerged rocks. These were confirmed with government high res map.
eggie (2023-07-05 09:07:22+00:00): Dag e..

Kijk even hier voor openingstijden
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138135649#map=19/52.02023/4.71021
Svp op de bestaande adresnodes bijtaggen. Je hoeft geen adressen aan te maken in OSM.
MVG
eggie
HikeAndMap (2023-08-23 01:33:58+00:00): Hi there, thank you for your contribution and please keep it up!

but first of all - don't add a 2nd node where there's already a node for your shop available use that node and just add your additional information please.

Just some notes to improve your contributions:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:level
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:level:ref
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:floor

And on the addr: tags please read:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:*

Success to your further mapping and please do read the articles so your shops can actually be properly navigated to.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138136119
mavl (2023-07-05 08:09:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138136737 where the changeset comment is:  The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the edit war].
Sajeevini sivajothy (2024-05-22 11:21:51+00:00): This application requires me to evaluate everything as good or bad, with no middle ground. If I mark something as bad, it could be because it doesn't adhere to the OSM tagging scheme. I will provide a changeset comment explaining my findings.


Here you tagged it as a Residential road but these are Paths and Tracks In your Changest comment, you said Residential way.
Refer This:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sri_Lanka_Tagging_Guidelines
Remember to include a clear changeset comment, for example: "Created Road, Place Name, District Names, Country Name, and Suitable Hashtag."
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138136223
mavl (2023-07-05 08:09:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138136737 where the changeset comment is:  The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the edit war].
martianfreeloader (2023-07-22 15:16:21+00:00): Hi again,

You've added a lot of cycle infrastructure here, great!

On cycleways, it is important to add the oneway=yes tag when they are only usable in one way. Otherwise, routing apps will direct the user on ways that they are not allowed to use in their direction. You have to make sure, the way points in the correct direction when doing that.

A good practice is it to always map sidewalks and cycle tracks on the right hand side of the road in forward direction and on the left hand side in backward direction (except in countries with opposite traffic flow, obviously).
mavl (2023-07-05 08:09:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138136737 where the changeset comment is:  The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the edit war].
mavl (2023-07-05 08:09:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138136737 where the changeset comment is:  The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the edit war].
mavl (2023-07-05 08:09:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138136737 where the changeset comment is:  The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the edit war].
mavl (2023-07-05 08:09:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138136737 where the changeset comment is:  The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the edit war].
mavl (2023-07-05 08:09:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138136737 where the changeset comment is:  The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the edit war].
mavl (2023-07-05 08:09:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138136737 where the changeset comment is:  The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the edit war].
eggie (2023-07-05 08:51:56+00:00): Dag _88   Namen kunnen inderdaad toegevoegd worden als https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name:ru
Dus in zulke gevallen zou je behoudend kunnen zijn om zaken weer te verwijderen. 
Waarom verwijderd?
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-07-05 09:02:02+00:00): reverted by changeset #138139011
mavl (2023-07-05 08:09:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138136737 where the changeset comment is:  The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the edit war].
mavl (2023-07-05 08:09:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138136737 where the changeset comment is:  The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the edit war].
mavl (2023-07-05 08:09:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138136737 where the changeset comment is:  The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the edit war].
mavl (2023-07-05 08:09:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138136737 where the changeset comment is:  The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the edit war].
mavl (2023-07-05 08:09:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138136737 where the changeset comment is:  The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the edit war].
mavl (2023-07-05 08:09:24+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 138136154, 138136269, 138136370, 138136388, 138136401, 138136421, 138136433, 138136453, 138136467, 138136476, 138136492, 138136499, 138136504, 138136535, 138136560, 138136607, 138136617, 138136643.
Patr1k_P (2023-07-07 16:07:42+00:00): a tuto adresu https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8994246458 ste preco vymazali?
Frans S (2023-08-26 10:36:35+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping
* Tagging of buildings. For HOTOSM projects, the standard tagging is 'building=yes' No further text adding.  Please keep that in mind at further mappings.
Best regards
eggie (2023-07-05 08:57:00+00:00): Dag _88   Alle begin is moeilijk. Namen alleen doen niets in OSM. Je zult dan moeten toevoegen de aard van het bedrijf. Bv shop=bakery

Kijk in de wiki bij de shop tags.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop

Beter geen adressen op de gebouwomtrekken zetten, maar bijtaggen op de reeds aanwezige . adresnode.. Maar ja dat wordt lastig als de bieb die al in gebruik heeft.
Ik pas even wat aan zodat het als school rendert.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-07-05 09:41:22+00:00): shop en amenity-tags toegevoegd. Je zou anders niets op de kaart zien. 
gr eggie
mgerken (2023-07-05 11:24:24+00:00): Moin,
danke für die Eintragung.
Kann man hier ausschließlich Fahrräder laden? Ich gehe mal davon aus, dass es da Schuko-Steckdosen gibt, dann wäre auch die Anzahl von diesen gut, also wie viele E-Bikes gleichzeitig geladen werden können.
Beste Grüße
obf1666 (2023-07-05 09:54:17+00:00): Ist der Stolperstein (https://www.stolpersteine-salzburg.at/stolperstein/schulhof_alfred/) hier wirklich endgültig weg?
Vispucci! (2023-07-05 10:22:48+00:00): Nein, ich habe erst jetzt gesehen, dass das ein Gedenktafel ist. Bitte drin lassen.
Patrickov (2023-07-05 08:41:30+00:00): This is what another contributor said after I shared this changeset on Discord:  "Just bc you can't find it among the first 5 google results doesn't mean it doesn't exist"

Admittedly that's guy's rather rude, but I suppose you have surveyed the area to come to this conclusion?
mavl (2023-07-05 08:29:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138137652 where the changeset comment is:  The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the edit war].
GITNE (2023-07-15 20:31:21+00:00): Ta „jednoelementowa relacja” w cale nie jest zbędna, bo szkoła muzyczna istnieje. Instytucja szkoły jest odrębnym obiektem od budynku szkoły. W danym przypadku, teren szkoły jest pokryty całkowicie budynkiem szkoły. Po za tym, nie ma w tym nic niezwykłego gdy relacja posiada jeden element. Trzeba wiedzieć co się czyni zanim zacznie się usuwać rzeczy o których się nie ma pojęcia. OpenStreetMap nie potrzebuje „poprawników”. Proszę przywróć tą relacje.
B_KSL (2023-07-17 14:01:27+00:00): Przywróciem chociaż z żadnym z Twoich powyższych twierdzeń się nie zgadzam. To że szkoła istnieje (i nikt nie twierdzi inaczej) nie implikuje jeszcze tworzenia relacji. Tak, budynek jest czym innym niż instytucja szkoły . Teren szkolny również. Schemat tagowania szkół, z umiejscowieniem tagów na obrysach terenu szkolnego nie ma wiele wspólnego z instytucją szkoły. W tym przypadku nie ma terenu szkolego poza budynkiem więc bez problemu można wszystko co dotyczy szkoły przypisać do obrysu budynku. Wg wiki nie jest to błędem jeśli szkoła zajmuje jeden budynek i nie ma terenu wkoło. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dschool  - druga linijka w sekcji mapowanie.
Tak jest prościej, nie tworzy się zbędnych relacji i nie zaśmieca bazy kompletnie bezużytecznymi  danymi.  Jednoelementowa relacja jednak jest  bardzo niezwykła. W wyjątkowych przypadkach da się jej zastosowanie usprawiedliwić. Tam gdzie można to zrobić łatwiej to nie cudujmy. Wielu kolegów traktuje to jako zło konieczne. I to tylko w przypadkach kiedy nie da się inaczej. Jak najbardziej odpowiada to jednej z podstawowych zasad osm - KISS. Albo polskiemu odpowiednikowi tego akronimu BUZI (Bez Udziwnień Zapisu, Idioto).
GITNE (2023-07-17 16:45:44+00:00): Dobra, widzę że przynajmniej prawidłowo potrafisz przywracać dane razem z historią. 👍
A zatem istnieje jeszcze nadzieja wobec Ciebie.
moje_konto (2023-09-01 20:17:09+00:00): Ale konkretnie, bez lania wody.

Dlaczego w tym przypadku wszystkie znaczniki nie powinny być na budynku?

Dlaczego musi to być multipolygon a nie zwykły landuse?

W zasadzie jedynym argumentem było, że instytucja to nie budynek - ale przy takim podejściu trzeba by wszelkie sklepy, firmy, instytucje dzielić na osobne obiekty od budynków - co tylko skomplikowałoby aktualizacje, bo korzyści nie widzę.

To że teren szkoły pokrywa się z budynkiem, to przecież powód żeby właśnie był to jeden obiekt.