piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_20264589 (2023-10-16 17:11:38+00:00): Hallo!

-Skulptur sm.org/node/11200040068 
	bitte ändern

-Labor-Neubau osm.org/way/
1212212141 
	geändert

-Kriegsdenkmal Kreuze osm.org/changeset/142095211 – 
	diese Zahlen stehen auf den Kreuzen und sind ein wichtiges Zeichen der Vergangenheit, deswegen bitte so stehen lassen

-Eingangsstelen osm.org/changeset/142094762 
	geändert - Fehler von mir, habe ich in die Beschreibung geschrieben und vergessen, im Eigennamen zu loeschen

-Mauerrelief osm.org/node/11235524209 
	geändert

-Baustelle osm.org/way/1215769334 
	geändert - Fehler von mir, sollte eigentlich in der Beschreibung stehen

-Gebäude im Bau osm.org/way/1196872948 
	geändert

-Versorgungsgebäude osm.org/way/1215783028 osm.org/way/1215783030 osm.org/way/913621130 

-Lagerstelle für Kohle osm.org/way/1216026481 
	geändert - Firmenname angegeben

-Lagerplatz osm.org/way/1216027272 
	geändert - Firmenname angegeben

-Changeset mit Mobilfunkmast, bei dem nicht auf den Kommentar reagiert wurde osm.org/changeset/141344116
	bitte ändern

Danke!
Tilia_J (2023-10-16 15:56:12+00:00): Goedemiddag,

Is hier ZEER recent een aanpassing aan de bebording aan de zuidkant geweest?

Ik kom hier als local regelmatig:

Als je vanaf Groenendaal richting het zuiden rijdt dan is het idd verboden voor motorvoertuigen muv bestemmingsverkeer.

Rijd je echter vanaf Terlet naar het noorden dan kom je een bord "doodlopende weg" en een bord "gewichtsbeperking 2,4 ton" met als onderbord "uitgezonderd bestemmingsverkeer" tegen

Feitelijk is de oude situatie gemapt met motor_vehicle:backward=destination dan ook correct.

Groet Tilia
Michiel Faber (2023-10-16 18:15:27+00:00): Hallo Tilia, 
Ik ben hier vorig weekend langs gereden vanuit het zuiden naar noord. Ik had het idee dat ik er uiteindelijk niet in mocht rijden (alleen bestemmingsverkeer). Wel gedaan en vanuit noord naar zuid de bebording bekeken. Daar is het zoals jij beschrijft in elk geval.

Als jij denk dat de oude situatie toch correct is, kan je de changeset weer terug draaien.
SomeoneElse (2023-10-16 14:10:15+00:00): Do you mean Armenian here? If ao, that is normally "hy", and I am very suprised that there is not a _current_ name in that language.
solenoid jam (2023-10-16 14:15:59+00:00): the code "hy" is also not recognized
SomeoneElse (2023-10-16 15:05:49+00:00): Yes it is: 
https://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/php/langcodes_name.php?iso_639_1=hy 
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/name%3Ahy#overview
julcnx (2023-10-21 08:09:52+00:00): Hi Barbara, I really appreciate your contributions! Local insights are fantastic, but tagging can sometimes be a challenge. After checking the wiki, I found that "guest_house=guest_house" isn't a valid tag. Based on feedback from the community, it seems like "building=apartments" is a more fitting tag for serviced apartments, so I went ahead and made that change. Thanks again!

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/how-to-tag-serviced-apartments/105037/3
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142668304
literan (2023-10-17 19:02:04+00:00): Незачет!
1) РГСАИ продублировали на здании (а теги вуза уже есть на территории)
2) shop=Пункт выдачи - это фигня, на русском языке тегов не бывает (кроме названий).
3) operator=Яндекс это неверно. В тег operator записывается юрлицо (ООО, АО) или ИП, управляющее конкретной данной точкой.

ну и аналогичные ошибки по почти по каждой точке.

поправлю
CjMalone (2023-10-16 21:14:24+00:00): Looks good to me, thank you!
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-27 13:54:35+00:00): Thank you for mapping. The mapping looks great and also the changeset comment. Happy Mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142668777
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-16 07:06:34+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/172144075/history has construction = construction that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What construction=construction means? What you wanted to express by using this tag?
CjMalone (2023-10-16 21:13:04+00:00): Hey, it looks like you tried to turn this residential. We'd also want to remove the other tags like methodist and service_times.

I've done this in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142684291

Thank you
impiaaa (2023-10-16 18:37:51+00:00): Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap! In the future, please save your changes in one area before moving on to another; this keeps the changeset to a reasonable size.
lordmcdrake (2023-10-19 13:34:09+00:00): Adresa má definovaný tvar, čo má obsahovať - https://wiki.freemap.sk/cislabudov

Prosím o rešpektovanie tejto logiky.
jaap de vries (2023-10-24 06:34:06+00:00): Bij gates graag aangeven dat dit een privé ingang is.

barrier=gate
access=private
DressyPear4 (2023-10-17 09:59:04+00:00): Olá, não ignore os alertas do editor, verifique as vias que não estão conectadas e adicione ponte ou galeria no cruzamento de rios com estradas.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142670105
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-10-17 05:34:01+00:00): have you discussed this mass edit with community?

Can you link wiki page documenting it?

are you aware of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-10-17 05:35:39+00:00): note that undiscussed mass edit can be reverted by anyone at any time without further reason
zluuzki (2023-10-17 19:51:59+00:00): those tags were automatically added at massive scale by the id-editor without it ever being properly discussed, so they can & should be removed in the same matter
SomeoneElse (2023-10-17 20:27:58+00:00): Regardless of how they were added, and separately from whether I personally think they're a good idea or not, it makes sense to discuss whether they should be there or not.  Taking an example, https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/osm-deep-history/#/node/597395247 shows that the story is fairly complicated.
In the case of GB edits, the best place to discuss is the talk-gb mailing list as it'll reach most people.
It should also be mentioned that mass removing or mass-changing tags automatically added by the most popular OSM editor is clearly silly without changing that editor; they will only get re-added.
Best Regards,
Andy
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-10-17 23:14:12+00:00): >  is clearly silly without changing that editor

in this case editor was changed and will not readd them, so this part is not problematic
DaveF (2023-10-18 14:41:52+00:00): My concern isn't with quantity or how they were added, but quality.

brand:wikipedia is a useful tag for filtering businesses to check name spelling. There's no direct duplication.
SomeoneElse (2023-10-18 14:51:55+00:00): Someone's started a thread on the mailing list: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2023-October/030791.html
SuborbitalPigeon (2023-10-18 14:57:34+00:00): What do you mean by "check name spelling". OSM doesn't use double entry accounting.
DaveF (2023-10-18 15:16:21+00:00): Overpass.
JassKurn (2023-10-19 15:30:43+00:00): I have reverted this in the following changeset

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142817683
DaveF (2023-10-17 11:16:10+00:00): What is the purpose of the edit?
What is wrong with brand:wikipedia?

I'd prefer to see the removal of wikidata tags whose pages are a poorly laid out hotchpotch of non information. Many appear to have been created solely so they be added to OSM.
SuborbitalPigeon (2023-10-17 16:34:25+00:00): The advantage of wikidata data is that they're not linking to an article in a specific language. Wikidata entries area always linked to the wikipedia articles anyway.
DaveF (2023-10-17 19:12:18+00:00): That doesn't explain the need to remove the Wikipedia tag.
-----
How do I set the default language in Wikidata? At the moment I have to scroll all the way to the bottom, past all the excessive white & & unfilled boxes.

In Wikipedia the language selection is at the top.
SuborbitalPigeon (2023-10-17 20:30:33+00:00): The wikidata UI isn't really the point though, it's the information that's there that's important. It gives additional information in standardised form, just like OSM tags in the first place
DaveF (2023-10-17 21:12:00+00:00): Again, doesn't explain the need to remove Wikipedia.
-----
Still unsure what you mean by "they're not linking to an article in a specific language.".
SuborbitalPigeon (2023-10-18 09:27:12+00:00): When you use a wikipedia tag, you prepend which language it's in. In order to get the same article in another language, you'd need to go via wikidata anyway.

Personally, I'm in favour of not duplicating information, so removing wikipedia links makes sense to me
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-10-18 13:31:17+00:00): note that undiscussed automated mass edit can be reverted by anyone at any time without further reason
DaveF (2023-10-18 14:31:28+00:00): Seeing as the Wikipedia tags are all in the UK, including the en tags seems appropriate.

Unsure what you mean by "In order to get the same article in another language, you'd need to go via wikidata anyway." as the different languages are listed on the wikipedia sidebar.

Wikidata does not duplicate Wikipedia data. It is completely separate. If information is added/removed in either it doesn't update the other.

As no reason for removing Wikipedia tags has been given, I'll be reverting shortly.
Wynndale (2023-10-18 15:51:44+00:00): One thing you could do is add an icon with a Wikipedia link to every Wikidata tag in the tag list on the web site.
JassKurn (2023-10-19 15:32:34+00:00): I have reverted this changeset 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142818835
SomeoneElse (2023-10-19 21:35:21+00:00): For the benefit of anyone stumbling over just this changeset, see also https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2023-October/030791.html
MarcoR (2023-10-17 06:57:25+00:00): Ciao e benvenuta su OSM!

Gli orari di apertura del negozio andrebbero specificati meglio (così come sono adesso indicano che il negozio è aperto dalla mezzanotte di lunedì alle 23:59 di sabato); per specificare un orario basta aggiungerlo dopo i giorni, tipo: "Mo-Sa 08:30-12:30,15:00-19:00"; per ulteriori informazioni vedi la pagina wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:opening_hours#Examples

Buon mapping,
Marco.
rene78 (2023-10-17 17:08:08+00:00): Hi rayth,

"proposed:amenity	fast_food" - what do you mean with that?

Cheers, Rene
mueschel (2023-10-22 12:36:12+00:00): Hi,
you added a strange 'addr:streu' tag here - could you check that?
Mic6464 (2023-10-23 07:39:23+00:00): Hi,
Thank you for your eagle's eye. You're right. I forgot several letters in the tag. I made the changeset. 
Have a good day.
felipeeugenio (2023-10-16 15:49:34+00:00): Estimado
Vemos que está moviendo todo lo que encuentra basándose en fotos bing.
Sabe usted a ciencia cierta que esas fotos son más exactas que las otras?
La verdad es que no. No hay manera de saberla de manera fácil. Hay distintas cosas que se pueden hacer para verificar alineamientos, sobre todo en zonas escarpadas. Por favor revisemos la situación antes de que proceda a seguir haciendo cambios de este tipo.

Vemos que incluso ha desplazado dibujos que hizo usted mismo hace unos días. 
por favor no seguir realineando el pueblo entero antes de verificar.
Vemos también que dejó alineada Arturo Prat dado que tiene una discontinuidad. Además calles que estaban derechas están quedando chuecas.
Saludos y gracias
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142671888
felipeeugenio (2023-10-16 15:52:59+00:00): Hola. En una revisión más profunda: está básicamente dejando todo chueco.

además dibujó una región de agua de un río que es bastante más pequeño.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142671888
byViruZz (2023-10-16 19:16:45+00:00): porque te das el derecho de deshacer los cambios, si no vives por estos pueblos
felipeeugenio (2023-10-16 19:23:17+00:00): Hola. El lugar de residencia no da ni quita derechos. Además hay fotos satelitales para corroborar alineaciones y realidades en terreno. Los cambios no fueron desechos por completo, solo las partes defectuosas, que lo eran en su mayoría. Pero varios fueron conservados.

Por favor no realinear caminos y pueblos completos sin base técnica alguna. 
Están las trazas strava, que son bastante escasas en esa zona para corroborar algunas cosas.

saludos
byViruZz (2023-10-17 15:36:54+00:00): Lo digo porque yo vivo aquí y conozco estos pueblos
felipeeugenio (2023-10-17 15:44:09+00:00): Estamos hablando de calidad de mapeo y consideración de factores relevantes para georreferenciar caminos con fotos satelitales. El domicilio de ambos es totalmente irrelevante en esta conversación.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-11-28 14:17:21+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9960229735/history - is there some construction happening here or is it merely proposed?
aixbrick (2023-10-18 08:37:36+00:00): Hallo,
ich habe hier einige Korrekturen vorgenommen (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142749896):
- Bitte immer englische Begriffe für Farben nutzen (also brown statt braun, siehe u.a. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7578806905/history)
- Fahrkartenautomaten sind keine Gebäude und heißen auch nicht "Fahrkartenautomat". Ich habe daraus einen Punkt gemacht und entsprechend getaggt: https://www.openstreetmap.org./node/11267229221
- Bei diesem Parkplatz https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/390657495 waren die Stellflächen mit amenity=parking_space korrekt erfasst. Du hast das auf amenity=parking geändert, was dann einer Dopplung entspricht. Ich habe das wieder zurückgeändert.
- In Bezug auf https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3782710 hast du den vorhandenen shop-Node nicht entfernt (darauf bezog sich der Hinweis). Da die Fahrradgarage auch nicht das gesamte Haus nutzt, habe ich den shop-Node entsprechend angepasst: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5782373153. Die Daten vom Hausumriss wurden entfernt.
Gruß
STEIN_aus_KELMIS (2023-10-18 12:05:28+00:00): Danke schön.
Darf ich dich noch etwas fragen:
bei Knotenpunkt 12 ist ein ehem. Grenzstein, Buschhausstrasse Raeren. Warum wird der nicht dargestellt, also NUR im Bearbeitungsmodus?
Herzliche Grüße
Michael Stein
aixbrick (2023-10-18 15:48:33+00:00): Die Karte unter https://www.openstreetmap.org/ stellt grundsätzlich keine Grenzsteine dar.
https://gk.historic.place/ zeigt sie aber (keine Echtzeitanzeige, bitte den Stand der Daten beachten, oben rechts unter "i").
orthocircular (2023-10-16 17:53:07+00:00): Hi there! Please avoid tagging explicitly for golf video games, etc, when it doesn't make sense. At the top here we have a rough and a building tagged on what is obviously a traffic island and a lamppost. Even if you're just trying to play an accurate game of golf, it's still inaccurate to be tagging stuff beyond the playing field. If the game doesn't know how to interpret lampposts and grass but you want them to appear, file a bug with the game author don't mangle the map.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142673863
BCNorwich (2023-10-17 07:53:44+00:00): Hi, You continue to make many mistakes in your mapping, I think you are copying tags from different features. This changeset has lots of buildings tagged also as highways. Worse nearly 300 objects are named "3456" clearly wrong, why do this?

I have been correcting a lot of your mapping on nearly all of your changesets and making comments that have gone unnoticed or ignored. This changeset with nearly 300 mistakes is just too much. So I'll revert this changeset hoping it will get a response from you. Maybe I can help you understand OSM's best practices for mapping.

Regards Bernard.








but this one is to much. So it's best to revert all these chan
BCNorwich (2023-10-17 07:55:59+00:00): Reverted in Changeset: 142699360
zstadler (2023-11-02 20:32:18+00:00): Although these orphan nodes were deleted after the start of the vandal attack on OSM Israel, all of them were orphans at "2023-10-13T19:26:40Z" - before it started.

See https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1COR
chris66 (2025-10-08 08:47:45+00:00): Hi,
betrifft: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11267270570

Der Poller hat bicycle=no und foot=no. Sicher, dass Radler und Fußgänger den Poller nicht überwinden können?
gmbo (2025-10-08 17:16:12+00:00): Du hast recht, entweder ich habe das falsch eingetragen oder es war beschriftet. Habe ers mal herausgenommen.Wenn ich das nächste mal da bin schaue ich genauer nach.
Geofreund1 (2024-03-25 16:51:27+00:00): Hallo geofoxx,
könntest du dir mal den Verlauf der St2159 im Bereich Muggenthal anschauen? Auf dem Luftbild gibt es dort eine neue (?) Straße, die noch nicht gemappt ist.
Gruß
Geofreund1
GeoAndi (2024-09-07 22:26:38+00:00): Hallo,
ich habe den Straßenabschnitt aktualisiert und den neuen Straßenverlauf eingezeichnet (siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156330467). Viele Grüße.
Geofreund1 (2024-09-08 09:17:48+00:00): Danke für deine Mühe!
Gruß
Geofreund1
moje_konto (2023-10-16 16:55:49+00:00): Nie no, weź przestań... edytuje się spokojnie, jeśli coś niejasne, to się pyta, a nie edytuje po milion razy.

Już było wyjaśnione, że wystarczy odświeżyć stronę. Jeśli nie widać, to trzeba poczekać aż serwery przemielą.

Podmieniając punkty jedyne co robisz - to bałagan w historii i jeszcze bardziej zwiększasz czas aż punkt będzie widoczny, bo od nowa musi być wyrenderowany na wszystkich stylach.
Jordi MF (2023-12-20 01:44:54+00:00): Hola Langenb1,
Por favor, utiliza la toponimia oficial de la Acadèmia Valenciana de la Llengua (https://visor.gva.es/visor/) para escribir correctamente el nombre de los topónimos (picos, collados, ríos, etc ).

A veces modificas nombres de manera incorrecta. Por ejemplo, 'el Teix' (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1249817876/history). No se llama 'Pico Teix'. La toponimia oficial en la Comunitat Valenciana es la que dicta la Acadèmia Valenciana de la Llengua. Por favor, utilízala para que la base de datos de OpenStreetMap sea correcta y no contenga los errores del IGN.

Saludos,
Jordi
eggie (2023-10-16 17:44:38+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 



Feedback  description zou wat korter kunnen. Niet de bedoeling dat er reclame wordt gemaakt. Verwijzing naar website is genoeg.
MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
seattlefyi (2023-10-17 15:20:51+00:00): Thanks for adding the capitalization! Looks good.
citrula (2023-10-16 20:11:43+00:00): welcome to OSM!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142675805
Glassman (2023-10-18 17:46:07+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142675824
woodpeck_repair (2023-11-14 13:31:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 144011037, 144011002, 144010984, 144011043 where the changeset comment is: revert edits des users Zinkeisen
Glassman (2023-10-18 17:52:20+00:00): #TIP: descriptive names are not used in OSM. Just tag the object to it's function. Can you review this edit?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142675977
CjMalone (2023-10-16 21:04:34+00:00): We usually try to square off buildings (Right click -> Square or Q)

Otherwise looks good, thank you.
Tomas_J (2023-10-18 18:37:00+00:00): Ahoj,

pozadoval si skontrolovat tvoju sadu zmien. 

Za mna: na prve pozretie mi to pride ok. 

Dakujem, ze sa podielas na zlepseni mapy Openstreetmap. Pokracuj v mapovani a ak by si mal akekolvek otazky, mozes napisat do diskusnej skupiny https://groups.google.com/g/osm_sk.

Tomas
aceman444 (2023-11-04 16:14:26+00:00): Zdravim, myslim, ze na highway=footway sa dava len footway=crossing, tie ostatne znacky crossing* idu na samotny bod priechodu, ktory je spolocny s cestou.
Glassman (2023-10-18 17:46:25+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142676333
eggie (2023-10-16 17:46:52+00:00): Yep  Dat is 'm.
Even ctrl-f5 als je niets ziet.
Gr eggie
champs-libres (2023-10-19 18:44:02+00:00): Bienvenue sur OSM Thomas Fabry!

Si tu cartographie dans le cadre de la SNCB, merci d'ajouter le hashtag #sncb (ou #nmbs) à ton commentaire de changement. 

J'ai remarqué que certains signaux était taggés avec les tag "direction=*" et "position=*". Pour les signaux, il faut utiliser les tags railway:signal:direction=* et railway:signal:position=*. 

Sinon les railway:signal:direction ont l'air corrects d'après ce que je connais de la gare d'Ottignies. Pour les railway:signal:position, je ne sais pas juger. 

Bravo pour ces premières éditions sur OSM: commencer avec des signaux ferroviaires n'est pas le plus facile ;-)

Julien Minet, de Champs-Libres.
YomanNH (2023-10-16 18:11:51+00:00): Dzięki za poprawki! :)
Anonimowy123 (2023-10-16 18:15:04+00:00): Nie ma za co! :)
flohoff (2023-10-16 19:54:19+00:00): Moin,
ist das richig das hier die Straße weg ist?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1216079844/history

Das hat ziemliche Routingänderungen mit sich gebracht:

Hier ein Beispiel:

https://osm.zz.de/routeqa/?rid=553606,563482

Grün alt - Rot neu.

Hier noch mehr:

https://gt.owl.de/pipermail/osm-owl-routeqa/2023-October/091740.html

Flo
Pitoresker Pi (2023-10-17 16:44:14+00:00): Hallo,
ja, die Straße wurde an dieser Stelle tatsächlich zurückgebaut.

Die neue Wegeführungen (im Rahmen der neuen Osttangente) sind ja bereits richtigerweise als Baustraßen eingetragen. Aktuell sind die Baustraßen jedoch noch nicht für die Öffentlichkeit begehbar bzw. befahrbar, sodass motorisierter Verkehr weite Umwege fahren muss. Und es scheint auch noch eine Weile zu dauern, bis die neuen Wege (teilweise) freigegeben werden.
Adam Dunn (2023-10-17 05:51:21+00:00): Looks like you took away the "construction" status of Stoney Trail motorway and tagged it as an active motorway. I drove past this two days ago and they were still actively paving it. The contractors have not announced it opening. Did you change the status in error? What source do you have for it opening? A major change to a major highway like this should probably go in its own changeset.
Thanks
hoserab (2023-10-17 17:32:14+00:00): I've manually rolled back changes made to Stoney Trail. I can say with 100% certainty that the freeway is still under construction between Bow Trail and Highway 8. It's not scheduled to open for another ~11 months.

Evpac, can you please add comments to your changes?
022 (2023-10-29 01:02:26+00:00): I have already had issues with this user making incorrect changesets and they never responded to my comments or concerns. Very frustrating.
mcliquid (2023-10-17 13:35:38+00:00): Hi,

Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-)

One general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
Glassman (2023-10-18 17:47:37+00:00): The access=no isn't really needed on drive through lanes.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142678342
eggie (2023-10-16 18:43:54+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
name=Tijdelijke brug zet ik onder note=....  Dat is een beschrijving. 

MVG, 
Wellicht heb je hier iets aan. 
https://www.satellietdataportaal.nl/?base=openstreetmap&res=0.3%2C0.5&datemin=16-10-2022&loc=52.34010%2C4.646533%2C19z&overlay=mos-0&marker=loc&acqdate=2023-09-08&acqid=20230908_110003_PNEO-04_1_1&sensor=Pleiades-NEO

Met vriendelijke groet, 

Eggie 

namens de OSM Community