piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Tomek | Yanosik (2023-02-08 07:01:46+00:00): Według mapki zamieszczonej na stronie https://zdmikp.bydgoszcz.pl/ nie jest możliwy przejazd ul. Toruńską przy skrzyżowaniu z ul. Kazimierza Wielkiego
adas (2023-02-08 08:29:29+00:00): Tak. Wczoraj jak rano jechałem to zdziwił mnie otwarty przejazd tam. Nie zauważyłem, że jest ślepy. Właśnie poprawiłem. Powinno być mniej wiecej ok. (odcinek od Kazimierza Wielkiego jest cześciowo przejezdny do firm tam znajdujących się.
Tomek | Yanosik (2023-02-08 09:51:42+00:00): Ok dzięki :)
Vil4ckc (2023-02-07 14:21:45+00:00): Чи обов'язково міняти порядок слів у назвах вулиць
user_6110846 (2023-02-07 15:29:36+00:00): з 19 січня 2023 року діє нове правило про порядок слів 

якшо назва є типу Зелена вулиця Молодіжна Київська то пишемо по старому   Зелена вулиця

якшо назва в честь людей то пишемо спочатк у слово вулиця а потім в честь кого наприклад вулиця Шевченка вулиця Лесі Українки 

про це рішення згадувалося в телеграм каналі української спільноти  
від себе 
це рішення мені зовсім не подобається тим що воно повністю копіює російське правило про назви вулиць 
під час війни вводити в дію російське правило якось неправильно
user_6110846 (2023-02-07 15:31:42+00:00): це правило стосується лише нанесення нових назв вулиць 

про зміну раніше нанесених мова не йшла
Colbertson (2023-02-07 11:13:18+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
OSM_RogerWilco (2023-02-07 09:54:06+00:00): Hallo Nadjita,

nur zur Info:
surface=cobblestone ist eine Oberkategorie von: unhewn_cobblestone, sett und paving_stones. Kopfsteinpflaster ist unhewn_cobblestone.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:surface%3Dcobblestone

Gruß Roger Wilco
Nadjita (2023-02-07 11:24:16+00:00): Ja okay, dann hab ich es nur präzisiert und nicht korrigiert. Ich denke bei „cobblestone“ immer an Kopfsteinpflaster ;o)
OSM_RogerWilco (2023-02-07 11:28:49+00:00): Alles gut, alles richtig!
Das ging mir früher nicht anders. Habe Natur-Kopfsteinpflaster damals auch mit cobblestone getaggt. Ist auch unglücklich gewählt. Aber damit müssen wir wohl leben. ;-)
Cebderby (2023-02-07 23:09:37+00:00): Changed map in 2 locations, wrecking recent changes which were up to date back towards old Esri(Clarity) road and building layout, despite referring to Bing imagery which shows the newer layout.  Vandalism reverted.
geow (2023-02-07 11:33:49+00:00): Moin, bist du sicher, dass der Laden hier nich existiert?
https://www.absoluts.de/
Ride Trail Map (2023-02-07 12:18:59+00:00): Hier unsere Grundlagen für den Eintrag:

Quelle:
https://www.bikeundco.de/haendler/mein-fahrradgeschaeft/bayern/rosenheim/prien-am-chiemsee/absoluts-bikes-and-more-gmbh-co-kg-12778

Überprüfung auf Google Maps:
https://goo.gl/maps/uDqpRJbimTNsffg7A
Ride Trail Map (2023-02-07 12:23:57+00:00): Shop ist gemäss Website umgezogen, der Eintrag besteht bereits auf OSM. Habe diesen Eintrag wieder gelöscht. Danke für den Hinweis.
geow (2023-02-07 17:22:30+00:00): Danke 🙏
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-11 14:46:56+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1138601911/history has amenity = church that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What you meant by amenity=church? It seem to be not documented value and it seems to be a duplicate of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dplace_of_worship - if you meant christian church then then it is taggable by amenity=place_of_worship religion=christian.
Gonéo (2023-11-29 15:33:49+00:00): L'allée de parking se termine en impasse ou bien elle rejoint la rue "normale" ? Si c'est une impasse, comme elle est très proche des autres il faudrait ajouter un "noexit=yes" sur le dernier point.
Sanji (2023-12-03 05:28:03+00:00): Elle se termine en impasse. J'ai ajouté l'attribut.
Merci.
mueschel (2023-02-08 09:51:23+00:00): Please check your edits for misspelled tags. There are no "motor_car"  or 
"motor_cycle" in OSM.
LakeQuilotoa (2023-02-09 04:06:59+00:00): Hello mueschel, thank you for bringing this to my attention. I have corrected the spelling of these tags
Happy mapping!
Larmax (2023-02-07 13:20:43+00:00): admin_ref is used for unsigned road numbers in Finland
user_177389 (2023-02-07 14:01:58+00:00): Oh sorry, will add admin_ref again.
Thank you!
GOwin (2023-05-24 01:04:48+00:00): Hello @Lykaaaa ! Welcome to OSM.

I noticed some spurious edits you recently made, and I'm wondering if you need any help with the tools or imagery you're using?

Usually, mappers will trace buildings features that appear on imagery, but what you've added appear to be way off, and actually is already on the map.

If you need any help, you can try reaching out to the local community, on platforms accessible to you: https://osm.org/wiki/PH
mavl (2023-04-25 09:10:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
map per (2023-02-07 17:50:23+00:00): Hallo Quorky,

und wilkommen bei OpenStreetMaps.

Wegen "Meine Änderungen überprüfen": Wenn die Läden längerfristig geschlossen sind sollte man im ID editor unten in der Eigenschaften Tabelle den Eintrag "shop" in "disused:shop" ändern um die Geschäfte zu geschlossenen Geschäften zu machen.
(Erklärung dazu im OSM Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:disused:*)

Danke und viele Grüße
map per
map per (2023-02-14 08:19:27+00:00): Habs auf disused gesetzt
eggie (2023-02-07 10:29:46+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback  maxweight =30  ipv 2.5 Zou dat echt?
layer=1 heb je al verwijderd zie ik.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-02-07 10:33:01+00:00): Dit kan onmogelijk correct zijn.
Wellicht 3.0?

Wat is je bron in deze?
MVG
eggie
Billycom (2023-02-07 10:40:35+00:00): De borden met de maximale asdruk voor vrachtwagens zijn verwijderd. De brug is dus toegangelijk voor vrachtverkeer.
eggie (2023-02-07 10:48:24+00:00): De voorgaande waarde van 2.5 heb ik weer teruggezet.
Wanneer iets anders nu staat aangegeven laat het dan even weten. 


https://smoothefiets.ddns.net/html/verkeersbordenkaart/index.php?id=9474385

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-02-07 10:53:46+00:00): https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=132195536

Oke...dat kan  maar waarom dan 
maxweight=30  ?
eggie (2023-02-07 11:28:01+00:00): De regel maxweight verwijderd

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-02-07 10:37:08+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback geen crossbaan meer hier?

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
R vd Elzen (2023-02-07 12:53:14+00:00): nee, geen crossbaan. Ik heb ook gereageerd op je email van zojuist.

M.v.g.
R. vd Elzen
eggie (2023-02-07 13:26:10+00:00): Middels PB gereageerd. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-02-07 13:36:20+00:00): Wanneer ik in de PDOK viewer de PDOK Luchtfotolabels aanzet komt inderdaad de naam  Elbie Bos tevoorschijn.
Geen idee waar dat vandaan komt?

Je zou eens een terugmelding kunnen doen en vragen wat hun bron is in deze. 
In de BGT omtrekgericht zie ik geen naam staan.
eggie (2023-02-07 13:39:57+00:00): Nog even gespeurd...
De witruimte en de bospercelen hier waar de paden lopen (nu liepen)  komt door de import vanuit de 3dShapes van een aantal jaren terug (2010).
eggie (2023-02-07 13:42:52+00:00): Het lijkt me beter de paden structuur in OSM te laten als highway=path en/of highway=track  zonder een verwijzing naar een crossbaan en dan met access=private als hier niemand iets te zoeken heeft.
Ik kan evt. je changeset terugdraaien zonder crossbaan en dan vervolgens aanpassen naar access=private
Zeg het maar.

MVG
eggie
R vd Elzen (2023-02-08 06:08:28+00:00): Hallo Eggie, ik weer niet wat het precies inhoudt, wat ik nu veranderd heb en wie en wat iets met deze gegevens doet, maar laat de wijzigingen die ik gedaan heb, maar even zo staan graag. Eens kijken of we dat merken met de drukte.
gr. Ronny
eggie (2023-02-08 07:26:42+00:00): Ronny.. Up to you.. Ik hoop met je mee.
Je hebt hier het circuit weggehaald.
Je hebt alleen kans dat iemand anders het weer gaat invullen.
Dan kun je beter een highway=path of track met access= private toevoegen. Dan is het geen circuit meer en valt als zodanig niet op.
Mvg
eggie
2A61RBRL8F (2023-02-07 10:10:55+00:00): Sure! I'll fix it.
Qwajo OSM (2023-06-06 21:04:24+00:00): Be sure to square all buildings when you map next time, thanks and keep mapping
ivanbranco (2023-02-07 12:50:10+00:00): Ciao Aleks, I don't get this relation. You just grouped in a relation elements with the same material. Isn't there the material=* tag already for that?
Aleks-Berlin (2023-02-07 18:08:49+00:00): Hello,
I simply wanted to remove >100x wikipedia=http..., so I moved the Wikipedia-Tag into a common relation. But I also wondered about the need for this wiki-tag. I'm fine with the removal, but I was carefull, because I once read the rule: "respect the work of others" which caused my decision. I should have added a fixme.
Kind regards, Alex
ivanbranco (2023-02-07 18:12:03+00:00): No problem, thanks for the reply, I'm gonna fix it now since I noticed other problems as well (not by you)
YjM (2023-02-07 13:55:08+00:00): Hello Frans, I have noticed you have deleted a waterway here. Was it intentional?

Thanks
 Jan
mavl (2023-04-25 09:05:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
ivanbranco (2023-02-07 12:44:38+00:00): Ciao pboscherini,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5550446405

ho notato che spesso aggiungi description=it_IT:ecc
Se la lingua è locale puoi anche omettere il codice ISO della lingua del tutto, ma se proprio ci tieni a esplicitarlo il tagging giusto è con il suffisso description:it=ecc , come da wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:description

Dovrebbe essere poi usato per descrivere l'elemento. In questo caso hai elencato una lista di siti web dei brand disponibili, in questo caso il tag corretto è brand:website=*, puoi separare i valori con un punto e virgola ";".

Buon mapping
ivanbranco (2023-02-07 12:46:11+00:00): Per la partita iva invece la sintassi è: La sintassi è <codice-paese><codice-IVA>, quindi in questo caso dovrebbe essere ref:vatin=IT02680040843 invece di ref:vatin=02680040843
pboscherini (2023-02-07 15:54:23+00:00): Ciao 'Commento di ivanbranco circa 3 ore fa',
it_IT non è un codice ISO, puoi condividere gentilmente la tua fonte in modo da permettermi di fare un confronto con i miei mezzi?
Grazie in anticipo.
ivanbranco (2023-02-07 16:47:50+00:00): La fonte di questa convenzione è la wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:description

In particolare questo passaggio: 
"description=* per una descrizione nella lingua locale
description:en=* per una descrizione in lingua inglese (en = inglese)
description:it=* per una descrizione in lingua italiana (it = italiana)"

I suffissi per la lingue su OSM sono l'ISO 639-1 (o -2 o -3 in mancanza), come indicato qua: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multilingual_names
ivanbranco (2023-02-07 17:04:32+00:00): Altre convenzioni che ti segnalo dopo aver dato una rapida occhiata ai tuoi edit: 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
Per esempio qua hai duplicato l'Haven come area (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1135464597/history), quando era già presente come nodo (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1610771994/history). Andrebbero uniti i due elementi per mantenerne uno. La descrizione inoltre non descrive il relitto, ma sono note riguardanti la mappatura. In questo caso si usa note=* (o note:it=*) invece di description=* (o description:it=*).
Per la duplicazione stesso discorso per "Angels Unawares" a San Pietro ecc.ecc.

Un'altra convenzione è l'utilizzo dell'inglese britannico, per esempio material=travertino andrebbe cambiato con material=travertine.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1138275186/history
^ Qua l'oggetto nella realtà è tondo, ma su OSM no. Se vuoi rendere un elemento tondo su OSM puoi selezionarlo e cliccare la lettera "O" sulla tastiera. 

Il tag wikipedia (e wikidata) si usa per pagine riguardanti l'elemento, quindi wikipedia=it:Gian Lorenzo Bernini non va bene perché la pagina riguarda il suo creatore, non l'elemento stesso. Puoi utilizzare artist:wikipedia=it:Gian Lorenzo Bernini al suo posto.
Stessa cosa per wikipedia=it:Travertino, material=* è abbastanza.

Per i file commons esiste un tag apposito, quindi wikimedia_commons=File:Centro del colonnato.jpg invece di image=https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Centro_del_colonnato.jpg
pboscherini (2023-02-07 17:34:28+00:00): Nella pagina proposta https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:description ho cercato: 
	ISO e mi da 0/0
	it_IT e mi da 0/0

Caso di specie: un tedesco, dalla germania, vuole scrivere un tag description e scriverci in inglese. Proprio per le omissioni del luogo da dove si scrive (addirittura nella pagina guida proposta), il tedesco dovrebbe come minimo scrivere un tag di tipologia description:en_DE oppure description:en ed il valore che inizia per en_DE:
Prima dell'underscore abbiamo la lingua in cui si intende scrivere e dopo l'underscore abbiamo la codifica della nazione, purtroppo ancora di 2 caratteri ma, già indispensabile a capire la provenienza e quindi il tracciamento della fonte geografica.

Per la partita iva la convenzione è la stessa 
	tagname ref:vatin:it e valore 02680040843
Se su un tool abbiamo evidenze in italiano ed inglese (a prescindere dal riquadro), è mandatorio avere evidenza della lingua in cui intendiamo scrivere nel campo e del posto geografico in cui siamo.
Oltrettuo questa modalità performa ulteriormente la indicizzazioen e ricerca dei tag senza poi considerare i capacity planning.
ivanbranco (2023-02-07 17:50:33+00:00): Le convenzioni sono quelle che ti ho linkato, cioè "description:it" invece di "description:it_IT=*" o "description=it_IT" e ref:vatin=<codice-paese><codice-IVA> invece di ref:vatin:it=*, se pensi siano errate puoi proporre una modifica: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal_process

Nel frattempo per favore attieniti alle convenzioni esistenti fino a quando le tue proposte non saranno accettate dalla community.
pboscherini (2023-02-08 11:45:43+00:00): Ciao 'Commento di ivanbranco circa 18 ore fa', ok pianifico gli interventi proposti.
Grazie per il supporto,
Piergiorgio.
foreigner037 (2023-02-07 11:31:08+00:00): Appreciate adding the interchange to the map, but I would please advise naming the junction only after the section has been marked with highway=construction. Otherwise we have these floating names in the middle of nowhere.
Dimitar155 (2023-02-07 13:23:55+00:00): Using proposed:highway instead of highway also does the job of hiding the name.
foreigner037 (2023-02-07 14:19:49+00:00): What about using highway=proposed + proposed=motorway_junction? In the page for proposed:highway it says to use that instead.
Dimitar155 (2023-02-07 14:40:40+00:00): It doesn't matter. Both options are widely used in such cases (500 for highway=proposed + proposed=motorway_junction vs 370 for proposed:highway=motorway_junction). The only difference is that you can more easily change the tags when construction starts (i.e. you won't have to cut and paste values, just delete "proposed:").
gscholz (2024-09-28 13:11:07+00:00): Hi Diego,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=10.28077&lat=43.97674&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=132199094

As you may know, this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps. Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
:-} (2023-02-07 18:22:57+00:00): xd
syntex (2025-07-27 11:56:33+00:00): xd
Sylabowy Kot (2025-07-27 12:03:38+00:00): xd
Casey_boy (2023-02-07 13:55:21+00:00): Hi,

In this changeset you removed the public footpath tagging of  	Morwenstow FP 7 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1138336312/history

Was this intentional? I appreciate the path deviates slightly from the local authority's PRoW data but it seems this is likely the "on-the-ground" route.

Thanks.
Casey_boy (2023-02-07 14:19:03+00:00): Same here (Morwenstow FP 12) too: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1054841757/history
AWMapper (2023-02-08 11:22:54+00:00): Thanks for your comment. Changes have been made following discussion with staff on the ground and following OSM guidance:  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Further_guidance_on_tagging_Public_Rights_of_Way_in_the_United_Kingdom#On-the-ground_route_differs_from_official_route.
Casey_boy (2023-02-10 09:15:07+00:00): Hi, did you physically check the local authority's definitive map and statement for this route? And not just their online data - which can be incorrect/off.  I think, since you are mapping on behalf of the National Trust there is a higher expectation on you to make sure you do not detrimentally edit the map. So if you are 100% sure this is not the public footpath route (i.e. you have checked the physical map and statement and discussed with the local authority) then you should also add in the correct route of the public footpath rather than just deleting the tags from the other path.
Warin61 (2023-02-08 00:08:23+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for adding this detail into OSM. 

However the area is also covered by Way: 135196663 .. so the rocks with be covered by tree  symbols.. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/135196663 Note that it is also tagged 'landuse=conservation' .. but I think it is more park than conservation. In any case the OSM guide is 'one feature=one OSM entry' so the trees should be split from the other feature (whatever it is). I take it your local so may know if it is signed as a park?
CirnoBaka (2023-02-08 07:00:41+00:00): I believe the intention of the conservation is the untagged park on the left side, the way definitively needs to be reworked. I would like to split it up into multiple areas which is why I've overlapped the rock for now, I plan to reshape the conservation way around it.

I am familiar with the area but I'm unsure if it is definitely defined as a park
Warin61 (2023-02-09 09:48:01+00:00): The DCS base map has two 'park' names to the west ... it is not very good at separating them... but it does define the 'park' or what ever the area is .. and those boundaries can be taken as the legal boundaries. Rock, trees and grass don't indicate legal boundaries, so I'd not use them when the DCS base map is available. 

Note that the sea ward side is the hi tide mark for the coast .. don't move it, leave it alone and make new ways for stuff. 

The Tanks could be place=islet for any bits above the hi tide .. that way they should render above the sea.
maraf24 (2023-02-07 20:33:15+00:00): Nie ma ronda ani budowy - nie ma więc zmiany.
danieldegroot2 (2023-02-09 20:09:12+00:00): Hi,

I'm using
- mapillary for the best image of an object; and
- *:image for one property of the object. This is intended for mappers, not for general users of the data. Noteably, some of these images lie in unexpected locations and there may be many other traces hiding them.
I'm aware I've been inconsistent with the use of mapillary id vs full url, since this an uncommon approach.

b-unicycling has also used *:image for the etymology of street names in this area.
I would appreciate if you'd discuss the use of tags with both of us before changing them. This prevents removal of correct data / (un)intended vandalism and issues with other mappers.

Also, usually an object only has a single mapillary value, which would be the best image of an object rather than any number of mapillary images available for said object. A single value is also better understood by applications.
I'm using *:image preferably only for exceptions. Elsewhere in Castle Yard I used it to refer whether the name came from the map board or a sign, since these may differ.

Regards,

Daniel
mueschel (2023-02-09 20:27:14+00:00): I never heard of or have seen an "image" suffix. The use cases are very few. 

It's much more common to use  source:key:mapillary. It's necessary to have 'mapillary' as part of the key, otherwise it's impossible to figure out what the number refers to. You can't use a link to Mapillary, because these already changed several times in the last years.
danieldegroot2 (2023-02-09 20:55:41+00:00): Could you message b-unicycling regarding this as well, please? Thanks in advance.
eserte (2023-02-10 19:15:23+00:00): highway=road erscheint mir nicht richtig. Sollte es nicht lieber residential sein?
Filip009 (2023-05-29 19:06:18+00:00): Ahoj, keď pridávaš parkoviská, tak ich prosím pridávaj ako plochu, nie ako bod, vďaka. :)
moonraver (2023-05-30 15:01:24+00:00): Ahoj,
1. Nemozem vyhoviet tvojej prosbe, pretoze parkoviska je povolene pridavat aj ako bod, cize to bolo urobene spravne.
2. Oficialne to nie je znackou oznacene parkovisko a nema ani jasne vymedzene hranice, parkuje sa aj na celej prerusenej ulici, chodim tade denne a zle je, ze nie je mozne ani odhadnut kolko je pocet miest a aka je tam zvyklost v parkovani.Preto som to zvazoval a urobil tam iba body a nie plochu. 
3. to tvoje som este trochu dolepsil. Pozri, zhodnot, si na OSM dlhsie ako ja, mozno si mudrejsi v mapovani.
4. pridavam k parkoviskam s nejasnymi hranicami aj operatora, aby bolo jasne, ked tam clovek zaparkuje,ze nie je na sukromnom pozmeku.Niekedy sa pozemky prelinaju a kontrolujem aj vlastnikov podla katastra. Je pravda,ze operator nie je to iste ako vlastnik, ale pomoze to.
Filip009 (2023-05-30 16:04:58+00:00): 1) Nehovorím, že je zle, keď ich pridávaš ako bod, Ale keď je možné aspoň trocha odhadnúť veľkosť, radšej by som používal plochu. Na maproulete je challenge na to, aby sa prerobili parkoviská z bodov na plochy, tam kde sa to dá, preto som ti písal, že ak je to možné, tak by si to mohol kresliť ako plochu ;) Taktiež na wiki sa píše, že je odporúčané to mapovať ako plochu.

3) Ja osobne ich nepripájam k ceste, pretože mi to príde zbytočné a zväčší sa tým plocha parkoviska, kde parkovisko už nie je, lebo je tam cesta. Nikde som ale nevidel napísané, že by malo byť parkovisko pripojené k ceste, alebo nemalo by byť. Keď máš k tomuto nejaké info, či pripájať k ceste alebo nepripájať, tak sa rád priučím. Môj názor je, že nepripájať to k ceste.

4) Tak to robíš riadne profesionálne :) Ja som u mňa pridal všetky plochy, kde môžeš v pohode parkovať. Až tak podrobne som to ale neriešil.