piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
iandees (2024-01-02 15:24:28+00:00): Please don't delete and remap. The objects you are deleting appear to be more accurate than the ones you're deleting.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145801673
CurlingMan13 (2024-03-21 02:30:04+00:00): They are continuing to delete and readd.

https://osmcha.org/changesets/146032152
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145801673
Grégoire Seux (2024-01-02 15:52:23+00:00): je cherchais les horaires d’ouverture d’un magasin dans cette zone commerciale et ils viennent d’être ajoutés. Merci!
Davidos64 (2024-01-02 16:36:20+00:00): Ah bah de rien X), si tu veux savoir je suis en train de faire le centre commercial Épicentre juste en dessous
◪ Jarv (2024-01-17 22:37:49+00:00): Hi, Usul. Welcome to Open Street Map.

The terminals themselves are correctly mapped and do not require an airport tag as it is a single airport
bxl-forever (2024-01-02 17:02:04+00:00): Hello,

Thanks for this.  I have reviewed and fixed some of your latest edits.

Can I please suggest to turn on the "Prefer contact prefix" option in the settings of the Every Door app.  This will ensure that when you add a phone number to a POI, it gets the modern tagging convention.

Don’t worry, I’ve already fixed this one.
SeverinGeo (2024-01-02 20:02:33+00:00): Hi, it's actually already turned on, but I added a second phone number and had not checked the key used for the existing one. It seems Every Door does not modify an existing phone key
canfe (2024-01-02 15:50:10+00:00): However, according to the meaning of building=*, this tag should be used for a building constructed as ruins (for example sham or scenic ruins in an English landscape garden). 
Così dice la wiki.
ruins:building=yes mi pare ciò che volevi mappare
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145802029
FabrizioBx (2024-01-04 16:32:52+00:00): cambiato tag, ciao
OscarBrownbread (2024-01-02 16:16:04+00:00): Thanks for adding the path. If you'd like to have the name shown on the path, then you can add the name tag, e.g. name = "Derrylea forest path"; the description tag is for extra info. Enjoy and happy new year!
danieldegroot2 (2024-01-25 20:12:41+00:00): -If- this name is signed, it can be added as "name" as mentioned.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions

If anything is signed it is likely the name of the forest itself ("landuse=forest"), or an L-reference number for the track ("ref=LXXXX").

I have changed the path to a track. For the difference between path and track, see
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=track

I have also removed the description, as it contains no information which is not already mapped (except possibly the forest name, but the extent of the named area is unclear); note townland name is already mapped.
( is: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6161746 )

Modified in
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146686555

You can view the changes here:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=146686555

Regards,

Daniel
VLD549 (2024-03-21 18:28:00+00:00): Hi, I recently understood that in case of voetwegen, we should write the name first, and then the number.

A message from one of your mapping colleagues: 
Putting the name as first gives priority to the name and puts the administrative number (of a system that is old and confusing) on a second place.

Should I change the order now to Candèlebosvoetweg - Voetweg 64?
Thank you!
Tom Ameye (2024-03-21 19:41:10+00:00): Not sure where this is coming from. I also don't see how a numbered road would be confusing, even on the contrary. Modern search engines also don't care whether the number is first or last. Unless someone convinces me to the contrary, I will not put much or any effort in changing this, because I don't see the added value.
VLD549 (2024-04-04 13:09:53+00:00): I understand you, I am just forwarding a message from one of the mappers.
Thank you for your response.
little_maper (2024-01-04 08:32:25+00:00): Hello Krsteel
I noticed you added a line with barrier=gate intersection with a node have barrier=gate
and it seems to a duplicate information in this location.
Please See One feature, one OSM element
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
in my opinion, this way 1236322691 needs to be barrier=fence
with fence_type
For more information in OpenStreetMap Wiki.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dfence
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:fence_type
could you check it, please?
Regards
little_maper
Jakka (2024-01-02 18:01:18+00:00): attention cette forme n'est pas un building.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/90173651
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=garden%20centre?uselang=nl
Richard (2024-01-02 15:40:38+00:00): Crap, forgot to close one before starting the next. Sorry for big bbox.
silversurfer83 (2024-01-02 17:38:02+00:00): Hi :)

wenn dies (endlich) ein ernstgemeinter Beitrag ist, hier noch ein paar Tips dazu:
Marktstände sind idR nur an ein bis zwei Tagen in der Woche vor Ort. Dafür gibt es den tag (Eigenschaft) "street_vendor=yes". Außerdem ist es dann sehr hilfreich die Öffnungszeiten einzutragen.

Weiterhin gilt:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

Grüße
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145804475
whb (2024-01-05 12:51:57+00:00): Revert:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145920881
NicoSa (2024-02-07 10:55:50+00:00): Hi Berlin53,
ich war am 30.01.2024 vor Ort und konnte, wenn überhaupt, nur noch den nach Norden abknickenden Weg erkennen. Siehe https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=52.429133347711&lng=13.525138192302&z=19.148662139977755&pKey=934468631018645&focus=photo
Berlin53 (2024-02-07 17:48:08+00:00): Hallo NicoSa, habe mal 2 von den 3 Trampelpfaden gelöscht.
Filip009 (2024-01-05 19:07:49+00:00): Nejedná sa skorej o malú vodáreň ako pitnú vodu? Pitná voda je toto https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:amenity%3Ddrinking_water
whb (2024-01-05 12:52:05+00:00): Revert:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145920881
MichS (2024-01-02 21:23:23+00:00): Hallo,

hier wurde bestimmt Versehentlich die gesamte Sportanlage zu einem Restaurant verändert. Bitte korrigieren.

MFG
MichS (2024-01-03 14:31:20+00:00): Danke
woodpeck_repair (2024-02-28 00:02:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 147993534, 147993538, 147993527, 147993537, 147993522, 147993535, 147993517, 147993518, 147993530 where the changeset comment is: revert edits of user Barroszt in 2024 that affect Torun, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146515808
Metzor (2024-01-03 19:58:34+00:00): Hallo Fabian,

Ich habe dir bereits eine Direktnachricht geschrieben, dass ich das Folgende falsch finde und wieso:
- amenity=marketplace
- name=Gärtnerturm

Ich schreibe es hier nur noch einmal, damit andere wissen, dass wir es zusammen verbessern wollen.

Schönen Abend!
Metzor
Fabian007 (2024-01-04 18:20:48+00:00): Hallo Metzor,

Danke für das verbessern Ortes!

Ich wünsche dir auch genauso einen schönen Abend noch!

MFG Fabianbuecheler
Filip009 (2024-01-05 19:00:42+00:00): Prosím naučte sa písať tie názvy spisovne. Názov by mal začínať veľkým písmenom, zabúdate aj na mäkčene a dĺžne.
CurlingMan13 (2024-10-27 20:32:17+00:00): Hello.  When you add roads, the name should not be abbrevaited.  In this case "Dr" should be spelt out to "Drive"

No worries - we've all made that mistake starting.  See you around!
WieKo68 (2024-01-03 11:31:55+00:00): Wg TERYT poprawna nazwa ulicy to ul. "R. Siemiradzkiego" (sym:46970) a nie "Henryka Siemiradzkiego"!
sdd1975 (2024-01-03 19:11:57+00:00): Na pewno Henryka. Chodzi o znanego malarza, który koniec swego życia spędził w Strzałkowie, a ta ulica jest, jakby, w okolicach Strzałkowa.
KrzychuEP (2024-01-03 20:29:00+00:00): W Terycie jest błąd. Na 43 wpisy z nazwiskiem Siemiradzkiego jest: 40 razy Henryka, 2 razy bez imienia i raz to nieszczęsne R. Siemiradzkiego: https://eteryt.stat.gov.pl/eTeryt/rejestr_teryt/udostepnianie_danych/baza_teryt/uzytkownicy_indywidualni/wyszukiwanie/wyszukiwanie.aspx?contrast=default
Metzor (2024-01-04 09:44:16+00:00): Hallo Fabian,

Ich habe deine Eintragung nach bestem Wissen mit folgendem Änderungssatz verbessert:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145855342#map=19/47.66078/9.17904

Hier siehst du eine schöne Übersicht, welche Tags ich gelöscht habe (roter Hintergrund) und welche ich hinzugefügt habe (grüner Hintergrund).

So bin ich vorgegangen:
1. Ich habe die Website vom Weihnachtsmarkt gesucht:
https://weihnachtsmarkt-am-see.de/

2. Ich habe die Wiki-Hilfe gelesen:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:xmas:feature#Weihnachtsm%C3%A4rkte

3. Ich bin jedes Tag in der wiki-Hilfe einzeln durchgegangen und habe mir die Informationen gesucht. Meist aus der Website vom Weihnachtsmarkt.

Bei Fragen, einfach fragen :-)

Schöne Grüße
Metzor
Harshit Rautela (2024-01-03 07:18:07+00:00): My dear friend from Nepal,
Stop vandalizing the map. While I acknowledge that there is a dispute at the border, the Kalapani territory in whole entirety is administered by India currently, and there is Indian presence right now at Kalapani and Nabidhang. As an Indian and resident of Uttarakhand, I am not running off to revert the map around Gilgit Baltistan or Aksai Chin, because while my nation has a claim on that portion, I know the administration of those regions are not conducted by India. So, do not spread false information about the current situation, keep your nationalism away from the ground reality. This is my formal request, because after some time, I am going to revert the map to status quo.
NKA (2025-02-26 05:58:24+00:00): Fin jobb.
1) Legg helst prosjektnavnet i description=*, siden name=* skal inneholde navnet på tunnelen, broen eller gaten, slik det senere vil stå på skilt langs veien.
2) Ikke bruk oneway=no, det er default.
NKA (2025-02-26 06:08:10+00:00): 3) Bruk layer=1 for bro og layer=-1 for tunnel.
berjk (2024-01-02 17:42:50+00:00): WAS???
Du hast ein neues Gebäude im Neubaugebiet gelöscht? Das Gebäude ist im Bing Luftbild sichtbar. Silcherstr. / Hegelweg.
Seppel427 (2024-01-02 19:42:54+00:00): Oh, da ist mir ein Fehler unterlaufen! Sowas darf nicht passieren, ich habe es wieder hinzugefügt. Vielen Dank für den Hinweis.
berjk (2024-01-03 13:51:17+00:00): Entschuldigung angenommen. Danke.
Friendly_Ghost (2024-01-18 21:49:53+00:00): Thank you for this cleanup :D
Jrachi (2024-01-03 08:35:46+00:00): Ciao.
Hai inserito dei name e dei ref che sono già presenti nella relazione hiking.
È buona norma non ripetere questi tag che sono già presenti nella relazione anche per facilitare la manutenzione di un oggetto "difficile".
Le relazione come sono ora sono corrispondenti al catasto regionale.
Vedo anche che hai usato il codice 205 su quello che è il 201A.  Forse sono presenti cartelli con quel codice? 
In tal caso si deve solo aggiungere il tag old_ref alla relazione, poi eventualmente avvisare la sezione CAI, o chi abbia messo il cartello, dell'errore da correggere. 
Per farla più breve puoi anche mandarmi un messaggio e ci penso io.

Sul guidepost Nodo: 8222475994 hai giustamente corretto la destination, però hai inserito: name=Località Truna.
Se non ricordo male, si tratta di una tabella rettangolare separata delle tabelle frecce con il nome della località.
Non è il nome del palo.
Finisco con dirti che mettere "name=Via dei Pellegrini - 201" ha due errori:
il primo è che quella way non è la via dei Pellegrini, il secondo che hai composto il nome con il nome della relazione (o dell'itinerario, se preferisci) e il ref della relazione.

Spero di ricevere una tua risposta entro domani, magari con le correzioni, altrimenti procedo a riportare i valori precedenti.

Ciao, e buone mappature!

Ivo
ranni00 (2024-01-03 20:49:04+00:00): Ciao Ivo, premetto che sono un neofita di OSM e dunque potrei combinare dei "pasticci". Inoltro p.c. anche a Marco Caparello che segue la nostra zona e con cui mi sono confrontato brevemente: mi ha detto che vi sentite frequentemente e dunque se non fossero esaustive le mie spiegazioni, ti prego eventualmente di confrontarti con lui. 

Diciamo che la Conferenza dei Servizi formale avverrà in corso d'anno e ho anticipato sulla mappa quanto già definito in pre-conferenza e condiviso con gli "attori" principali. 

Dunque il vecchio 201A diverrà il nuovo 205 e sul percorso risultano già apposti alcuni adesivi (provvisori) in molti punti, non tutti, dunque chi passa vede già la nuova numerazione.

Per la Truna, sì, la tabella con scritta "Località Truna" è separata dalle 2 frecce sottostanti con le specifiche mete. Pensavo avesse un senso indicare anche la località, anziché lasciare una anonima icona "segnavia" sulla mappa, proprio perché la tabella in loco riporta quel toponimo.

Infine, non sapevo della necessità di separare il nome del percorso (VdP) dal suo codice 201, parte dell'itinerario complessivo. Tieni conto che "Via dei Pellegrini" era già riportato sulla vecchia segnaletica non a norma, ora sostituita con frecce e tabelle "regolari" sul percorso originale 201. Dunque, chi passa leggeva e legge quell'informazione sul campo, come del resto risulta anche su altra segnaletica per altri percorsi parte dell'itinerario VdP, pur se non ancora formalizzato.

Valuta quanto meglio ritieni e ti chiedo - se possibile - di provvedere direttamente alle eventuali modifiche / integrazioni...così da non peggiorare le cose. Diversamente, fammi sapere
Grazie dell'aiuto.

Claudio
Jrachi (2024-01-05 09:55:33+00:00): Stai anticipando la conferenza? 
Bene, allora me lo segno se vedo modifiche differenti alla situazione a catasto attuale.
Nomi su strade e sentieri:
In generale si mette il nome solo se è il nome e non se è la descrizione fatta da from e to.
Poi se il nome corrisponde alla intera relazione si toglie per evitare la ripetizione. 
Nel caso della Via dei Pellegrini non corrisponde ad un sentiero a catasto per cui il nome sulle way si lascia. Mi sembra anche che sia un itinerario non mantenuto (come segnaletica). Se così si potrebbe cancellare quando non ci saranno più cartelli che lo indicano.
Il name sui luoghi di posa è un tag suggerito dal CAI e si dovrebbe inserire il nome con cui è conosciuto dai manutentori.
Nella mia sezione posiamo/ripristiniamo centinaia di pali all'anno, ma per riferirci ad uno specifico si usa la descrizione della posizione. Per cui per me di solito il name è vuoto (e magari prima o poi troverò il tempo di discutere quello e altri tag proposti dal CAI che starebbero bene in una pagina web e non su un database geografico.
Comunque sia.
Buon Anno e felici mappature ed escursioni in montagna.

Ivo
Ad esempio
eggie (2024-01-02 17:38:30+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback Meestal zijn tweewielers uitgezonderd van oneway=yes Is dat hier het geval. Dan toevoegen oneway:bicycle=no  en evt ook voor moped en mofa
Het routeert anders niet meer voor tweewielers.
MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Audi_gekkie (2024-01-02 17:49:23+00:00): Dankjewel Eggie,
Ik heb zoals je ziet geen ervaring in OSM, maar wel veel in Waze. Dit is ook de reden dat ik tweewielers ben vergeten:)

Van beroep ben ik landmeter/BGT-beheerder, dus ik zal mijn weg hier snel vinden.

Groeten, Johan
eggie (2024-01-02 18:22:06+00:00): Oke Johan.. mocht er een uitzondering zijn voor (brom)fietsers pas je het dan zelf aan?
Als het niet lukt laat maar weten. Dan moet ik wel weten wat op het onderbord staat.
Mapse..
eggie
Audi_gekkie (2024-01-02 18:52:06+00:00): Hoi Eggie,
Aangepast naar één richtingsverkeer voor alleen motorvoertuigen

Groeten Johan
Audi_gekkie (2024-01-02 18:54:23+00:00): Maar bromfietsers mogen wel.
Hoe doen jullie dit?
eggie (2024-01-02 18:58:47+00:00): Zie https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145810644

:)
eisa01 (2025-04-04 17:41:31+00:00): Hello, OSM is only supposed to have things you can see on the ground. I have deleted the sports club you added here
woodpeck_repair (2024-01-09 21:21:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 146081198 where the changeset comment is: undo undiscussed and large-scale deletions of paths not open to public - use access=private instead
Filip009 (2024-01-05 18:56:14+00:00): Zdravím, lom nie je meno. Meno môže byť lom Barbara, lom Helena alebo podobne a aj v tom prípade to treba do name uvádzať bez "lom". To, že sa jedná o lom je už dané landuse=quarry. Popis objektu, ktorý je už uvedený tým, že ste tento typ objektu vybral mažem.
DiogoBaptista98 (2024-01-07 14:55:47+00:00): Posso perceber porque criou estradas que não existem na vida real?Cumprimentos
DarkAustrian (2024-01-13 00:05:15+00:00): Hi, I thought I could do a kind of a simulation - I know the road does not exist yet. Apologies.
Alexandreokanaku (2024-01-02 17:47:49+00:00): currency:XBT=yes
MarcoR (2024-01-05 11:41:20+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

If the road has some kind of restricted access you can use the access tag (for more info see the wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access).

Happy mapping,
Marco.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-02 18:00:24+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11479464087
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11479464152

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Hungerburg (2024-01-03 18:23:55+00:00): Der Gebhardtweg ist eine alpine Mehrseillänge mit Schwierigkeit IV.
Yakari (kleiner Indianer) (2024-01-03 17:21:09+00:00): To už se to zprovoznilo?
Piskvor (2024-01-05 16:52:10+00:00): Ahoj, bohužel nikoli. Ten úsek D0/511 (a ostatně i D0/520) byl předtím zanesen v OSM správně: highway=proposed, proposed=motorway (a podobně). Takto jsou zmapované úseky, kde dosud nezačala stavba (ta je pak highway=construction, construction=motorway). Ve chvíli, kdy se to přetaguje na highway=motorway, znamená to "tohle je existující, funkční dálnice", se vším všudy: objeví se v mapě, navigace po ní začnou navigovat, a tak dále. 

Trvá ta stavba-nestavba v reálu už třetí dekádu - a mně by se to taky hodilo, kdyby to už existovalo - leč OSM funguje opačně: do mapy dáváme svět, jak je; mapování "tady bych chtěl, aby bylo tohle" vede k mapám fiktivním (což je třeba OpenGeoFiction).
Piskvor (2024-01-05 16:53:00+00:00): Detaily k proposed, construction, etc., na OSM wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:highway%3Dproposed
Piskvor (2024-01-05 16:56:52+00:00): Jinak jako začátek je to smělé, to je dobře - kdo nikdy nesmazal kus dálnice, první hoď kamenem ;) Jen holt bude třeba počkat, až k té změně tady dojde, a do té doby mapovat jiné změny :)
Yakari (kleiner Indianer) (2024-01-05 17:20:23+00:00): Jo, jenom mě napadlo, zda to nakonec nedat do výstavby, pokud ji tam opět zanese jako postavenou, tak bych to viděl jako zlatou střední cestu aby se to pořád nemuselo předělávat, i když trochu napřed. Jen tak mimochodem, kdy že se to má začít stavět?
Piskvor (2024-01-05 17:34:37+00:00): Co se týče "zda to nakonec nedat do výstavby" - v žádném případě! To je stejné přání otcem myšlenky, jako ji namalovat už hotovou. Ta dálnice není ve stavu "už se skoro staví", je ve stavu "je v plánu, běží administrativní procesy". AŽ se bude stavět v reálu (zemina, náklaďáky, buldozery), PAK má smysl ji značit jako rozestavěnou, do té doby je to jen malování zbožných přání po mapě.

Zejména to platí tady u té konkrétní stavby, která se má začít stavět za dva roky - totiž vždycky se má začít stavět za dva roky, už asi tak třicet let. Úplně stejně má smysl značit railway=construction v Bubnech, kde už roste most - ale ne na letišti, ačkoli obojí je stejná trať a jednou by prý ta stavba měla dojít až tam.
VLD165 (2024-01-02 21:15:12+00:00): source: https://fburl.com/zbnjnlk9
flohoff (2024-01-02 20:16:24+00:00): Hier ist die route auch geschwenkt. Wird aber nicht im public OSRM profil so sein.

Das ich lane_markings=no interpretiere als "die straße ist schlechter" (75%) ist nur bei mir drin.

https://osm.zz.de/routeqa/?rid=558280,661694

Ich hab da eine OSRM issue gegen das car profile auf aber unbearbeitet:

https://github.com/Project-OSRM/osrm-backend/issues/6712

Flo
Ökkel (2024-01-03 16:34:51+00:00): Aso. Bei dieser Straße aber nicht so schlimm, die gehört ja zum Innenstadtring.
eggie (2024-01-02 19:05:47+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback  Tegenwoordig gebruiken we in Nederland alleen de adresnodes om bedrijven op bij te taggen. Wanneer een gebouw een naam heeft kan dat er natuurlijk wel op. Adresgegevens zijn niet nodig. Dat kan er af. Er is een adresnode. 
Bedrijven beter ook op de adresnode bijtaggen. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-01-02 19:18:25+00:00): Info verplaatst naar adresnode.. Kijk even hier welke officetag van toepassing is.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:office=company

MVG
eggie
yvecai (2024-01-03 09:00:59+00:00): Beau travail !
RobMazc (2024-01-03 17:42:41+00:00): Merci beaucoup ! C'est surtout grâce à l'expertise de l'association du HSB.
eggie (2024-01-02 18:58:11+00:00): Hoi   Dit zijn je edits... Dat is niet helemaal goed gegaan
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=145810644

access=no is Verboden Toegang.
bicycle=yes en foot=yes is default op wegen.
Het gaat om de uitzondering voor tweewielers.
Dus dan
toevoegen
oneway:bicycle=no
oneway:moped=no
oneway:moped=no

verwijder access=no.

Wanneer je de ins en outs weet van de BGT is het te overwegen om over te stappen naar de beter editor JOSM.
plakken in ID. Tip; linker Alt toets vasthouden en ID plakt niet :) 

 
editor josm stap voor stap 

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/editor-josm-stap-voor-stap/75047 

 

BGT implementeren  

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59021 

Forumdraadje ..  De beste imagery layers om NL OSM te mappen met JOSM. 

Https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=64644 

Hier kun je zien hoe je de .jos file kunt gebruiken binnen JOSM.  
https://youtu.be/33EenoZezWg 

Groet
eggie
Audi_gekkie (2024-01-02 19:04:46+00:00): Sorry Eggie,
Ik zit mijn edits te doen op mijn telefoon. Dikke vingers. Zal het in het vervolg op de laptop doen.
De parkeerplaats moet geen mutatie hebben.

Kerkstraat mag je aanpassen voor mij.
Ik doe de volgende mutaties JOSM.

Groeten Johan
eggie (2024-01-02 19:07:48+00:00): Oke.. Ik pas het aan. 
... Je zult zien dat je met JOSM meer overzicht hebt. Dan is editor iD maar behelpen.
Mapse
eggie
damianeue (2024-01-02 18:54:01+00:00): work in progress
b-holdet (2024-01-04 06:23:35+00:00): Hej Jens,
Jeg kommer forbi her dagligt og der er en fin indkørsel her til nr. 6.
Hvad er baggrunden for at slette den?
Jens Peder Pedersen (2024-01-04 12:18:40+00:00): Hej b-holdet
Den på kortet markerede indkørsel eksisterer ikke som indkørsel. Der er en holdeplads ud til Majgårdsvej. Den øvrige del af den markerede indkørsel  er græsplæne med en smal gangsti frem til nr. 6. Arealet er en opfyldt tidligere afvandingskanal og er følgeligt meget fugtigt, sumpet og pløret og ofte oversvømmet. Arealet er derfor helt uegnet som indkørsel og tungere færdsel.  Den på kortet markerede indkørsel er derfor slettet for at undgå at nogen fejlagtigt kører ind på arealet og uundgåeligt vil køre fast. Nr. 6 har en flisebelagt adgang fra Tigervej, som er den primære adgangsvej.
b-holdet (2024-01-04 14:07:55+00:00): Ok, jeg kan se at du er ejer af grunden.
Din matrikel ser ud til at have dette stykke med, som om det er planlagt at have indkørsel her.
Jeg kan godt se at området er blevet mere vådt de seneste år.