piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
A35K (2024-03-26 18:45:04+00:00): Hallo, ich habe gerade extra nochmal auf Komoot nachgeschaut, Komoot navigiert richtig über die den Müncher Ring/Ampel. 

Von den OSM Routern navigiert von Norden nach Süden Valhalla richtig, ORSM falsch (Da Einbahnradweg) und Graph Hopper dank der falschen Verbindung auch falsch. 

Auch über die Tankstelle währe besser als Routing über einen Bordstein welchen man mit einem Fahrrad rein physisch nicht bewältigen kann.
nurdafur (2024-07-10 16:18:19+00:00): Hallo maps4junkies

Du hast in diesem Changeset an der Kreuzung Zollkaje, Deichstraße und Am Alten Hafen diverse Fahrtrichtungstrennungen zugefügt. Wenn ich das richtig in Erinnerung habe von meiner Durchfährt mit dem Fahrrad Ende Mai, dann gibt es dort am Zollkaje und Am Alten Hafen nur Farbe am Boden und keine Verkehrsinseln. Das spricht gegen eine Fahrtrichtungstrennung.
Zudem fehlen bei allen Fahrradrouten, die dort vorbei gehen, nun einzelne Segmente. 
Kann ich das wieder auf eine Straße mit Gegenverkehr ändern?
Liebe Grüsse und weiterhin viel Spaß beim Kartografieren 
Urs
maps4junkies (2024-10-25 15:29:34+00:00): Hallo, Verzeihung die späte Rückmeldung. Es gibt dort durchaus Verkehrsinseln. Ich kann dir gerne Bilder nachliefern, falls weiter Zweifel bestehen. Auch bei Sperrflächen (dort auch vorhanden) sind Fahrtrichtungstrennung nicht unüblich, nach meinem OSM-Kenntnisstand.

Beste Grüße
CurlingMan13 (2024-03-25 23:52:33+00:00): Do not partially overlap land areas.  I encourage you to read up on common mapping pitfalls:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#:~:text=the%20building%20itself.-,Common%20mapping%20pitfalls,-Adding%20name%3D*

I have gone through and cleaned up this edit for you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149150344
NieWnen (2024-03-26 19:29:35+00:00): Podobnie jak tutaj: proszę o nie mapowanie/nie usuwanie w przypadku braku pewności. 

Usunięte zostały przejścia w budowie, których nie widać na ortofotomapie: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149143413

Zmiany częściowo musiałem wycofać, a częściowo poprawić.
phidauex (2024-04-27 18:06:13+00:00): Hi, I reconnected the sidewalk at Old Brompton Road, breaking that connection interrupts routing in the area. Generally speaking with sidewalks, while following the actual line is usually best, you do often need to make connections to other ways to allow logical routing, to show that a bicycle or pedestrian could transition from the sidewalk to the road at that location.
eggie (2024-03-26 07:57:03+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback   Alle begin is moeilijk. incline=yes hoort een percentage aan te geven op =up of down.. Dus niet =yes. Ligt aan de richting van de weg. Wellicht brug in het midden splitsen. 
bicycle=yes of designated hoort niet op fietspaden. Dat is default. Geldt eigenlijk ook voor foot=yes.
Ik heb wat aangepast.
MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-03-26 08:25:26+00:00): Wat leesvoer https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:incline
Frans S (2024-04-23 15:36:21+00:00): cc @fruitbat6th
We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Some buildings inaccurate mapped.
Included shadow into a building.
Buildings not squared.
Connected nodes of buildings to other buildings

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149151208
marczoutendijk (2024-03-27 11:24:12+00:00): Dear MariusEbe,
Thank you for adding this comment to your changeset!
Can you start using them on all your changesets?
It would help others much in their mapping activities.
Oskarst_ (2024-07-26 07:27:33+00:00): Hei,
Furu skole på Holssanden er lagt ned og omgjort til en barnehage for en del år siden. Stemmer det fortsatt at at gressplenen kalles Furu skole?
NKA (2024-07-26 13:18:41+00:00): Anar ikke. Banen har det navnet i idrettsanleggregisteret. Ofte lever skolenavnet videre.
Frans S (2024-04-24 10:51:31+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. However, no buildings squared. Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149151402
joel56dt (2024-03-26 14:46:28+00:00): Hi coolguy999,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Let me know if you have any questions about contributing to this project. It can be a lot of fun.

Your edits here and all edits to OpenStreetMap are public. I have reverted the changes you made in this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149181480

Thanks,
joel56dt
CurlingMan13 (2024-03-25 23:52:25+00:00): Do not partially overlap land areas.  I encourage you to read up on common mapping pitfalls:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#:~:text=the%20building%20itself.-,Common%20mapping%20pitfalls,-Adding%20name%3D*

I have gone through and cleaned up this edit for you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149151704
Frans S (2024-04-23 15:31:12+00:00): cc @fruitbat6th
Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 
However, not all buildings squared. Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149151967
CurlingMan13 (2024-03-26 00:01:33+00:00): Don't add descriptive names to features. Only official names should be added. You can read more here:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149152634
tunnlr (2024-03-29 22:30:10+00:00): "Blauwpoortsweg" bestaat niet; is over de gehele lengte "Blauwpoortseweg" met 'e'. 

Zie ook bijv: 
https://app.pdok.nl/viewer/#x=24445.13&y=392825.12&z=11.7511&background=BRT-A%20standaard&layers=
A67-A67 (2024-03-30 19:50:52+00:00): De BAG geeft wel de straatnaam Blauwpoortsweg in Meliskerke. https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/?searchQuery=Blauwpoortsweg&objectId=0717300000000539&theme=BGT+Achtergrond&geometry.x=24376.5&geometry.y=392880&zoomlevel=11.417324991334137

De BAG is autoritatief op het gebied van adressen. De BGT is daarvan een afgeleide, die meestal ook klopt. De BRT, in je link, klopt niet altijd.
tunnlr (2024-04-02 17:37:37+00:00): BAG is hier toch echt fout. En dat vinden de straatnaambordjes ook. Het is Blauwpoortseweg.
A67-A67 (2024-04-03 14:20:32+00:00): De BAG is in principe niet fout. Het is de overheidsdatabase waarin de officiële straatnamen staan. In dit geval lijkt het me het beste om de 'on the ground rule' te gebruiken voor de name-tag en de BAG voor de official_name-tag en addr:street-tag.

Dus:
name=Blauwpoortseweg
official_name=Blauwpoortsweg
source:name=straatnaambord
source:official_name=BAG
Frans S (2024-04-20 12:36:47+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.

Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Included the shadow of a building.
Inaccurate mapped.
Buildings not squared.

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149152745
ivanbranco (2024-03-26 10:27:25+00:00): Hi IronSurfer,

https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/172705725

thanks for the edits, just three points
1. why did you deleted addr:city=Berat? 
2. why add addr:housename=n/a? If there's no housename wouldn't be better to not use this tag at all?
3. the wikimedia_commons=* value is not a wikimedia_commons file.

Good mapping
IronSurfer (2024-03-26 18:39:17+00:00): Number of the house was not available that’s why I used n/a
IronSurfer (2024-03-26 18:40:02+00:00): Do not understand your first point.
IronSurfer (2024-03-26 18:43:06+00:00): Did not delete Berat in the tags.
ivanbranco (2024-03-26 18:48:22+00:00): You did it here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/172705725

addr:city=Berat was added in v6, and you deleted it in v8. You made it by mistake I guess then, no problem :)
IronSurfer (2024-03-26 21:11:57+00:00): I do not know how but anyway thanks for checking and appreciate you to fix it
Frans S (2024-04-23 15:27:18+00:00): cc @fruitbat6th
Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. However, most buildings are not squared. Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149152791
Frans S (2024-04-23 15:32:32+00:00): cc @fruitbat6th
We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)

Inaccurate (rather sloppy) mapped.
Buildings not squared.
Connected nodes of a building to a highway.

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149152801
Frans S (2024-04-23 15:29:05+00:00): cc @fruitbat6th
Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 


Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149152847
Aleksandar Matejevic (2024-05-15 14:19:49+00:00): Can you point me to which page you are referring to? New Harbor was village, you have change it to neighbourhood, but it does not look like one.
Frans S (2024-04-23 14:19:25+00:00): cc @fruitbat6th
Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 
Please do not connect nodes of a building to other features, like a highway.
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149152879
Frans S (2024-04-23 15:24:59+00:00): cc @fruitbat6th
We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Sometimes inaccurate mapped.
Included shadow of the building.
Connected nodes to buildings

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149152912
cityrolr (2024-03-26 01:12:17+00:00): This shop used to be "Holzconnection", is that not the case anymore?
outer_soup (2024-03-26 13:27:43+00:00): No it's a fitness studio now.
https://www.feelthebarre.de/
cityrolr (2024-03-26 16:25:06+00:00): Ok, I updated the category (not a furniture place anymore) and opening hours additionally.
Frans S (2024-04-23 14:15:55+00:00): cc @fruitbat6th
We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Sometimes inaccurate mapped and squared
Shadow included in a mapping.


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149152982
Frans S (2024-04-23 14:14:00+00:00): cc @fruitbat6th
Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. However, Please do not include the shadow of a building into your mapping

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149153000
Frans S (2024-04-23 14:12:28+00:00): cc @fruitbat6th
We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Inaccurate mapped.
A number of buildings are not squared.
Included the shadow into a mapping.
Often somewhat oversized mapped.

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149153034
Frans S (2024-04-23 14:09:56+00:00): cc @fruitbat6th

We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Inaccurate mapped.
Not a single building is squared.
Included the shadow of a building into your mapping

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149153060
Frans S (2024-04-23 14:07:21+00:00): cc @fruitbat6th
We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Inaccurate mapped.
Many buildings not squared. 15 out of 43 

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149153065
Frans S (2024-04-23 14:04:46+00:00): cc @fruitbat6th
Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149153078
NorthCrab_upload (2024-03-25 23:30:21+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2191856297
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1266311724

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
MxxCon (2024-03-28 22:37:42+00:00): Hello.
When mapping crosswalks, please don't forget to connect them to the intersecting streets.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149153112
Frans S (2024-04-23 14:02:37+00:00): @fruitbat6th
Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. However, 29 out of 85 buildings are not squared.
Please do not connect nodes of buildings to each other. Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Please do not connect nodes of buildings to each other.
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149153206
Frans S (2024-04-23 13:58:36+00:00): cc @fruitbat6th
Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149153212
Szymson (2024-07-12 17:41:53+00:00): Tam faktycznie jest znak zakazujący jazdy rowerem, że dodałeś bicycle=no?
RahmelSagorsch (2024-07-23 21:16:41+00:00): to nie tak że jest zakaz, tam fizycznie niema możliwości przejechania, pieszo trzeba było obejść odcinek który jest na mapie
Szymson (2024-07-24 03:41:44+00:00): To od tego jest tag smootness i track_grade. W tagu note możesz dokładnie doprecyzować sytuację, ale nie możesz dać bicycle=no skoro nie ma znaku zakazu.
RahmelSagorsch (2024-07-24 14:05:01+00:00): Zrozumiano 👍
Frans S (2024-04-23 15:22:41+00:00): cc @fruitbat6th
Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149153412