piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Marion_Moseby (2025-02-26 22:30:49+00:00): Hahaha well, I have absolutely NO idea how that got there
Valkai_S (2024-10-07 11:53:55+00:00): Sajnos, időközben be is zárt a bolt: beírtam egy "disused"-et esetleg ezt is meg kéne nézni, hogy jól csináltam-e. A fényképre hivatkozást kivettem (töröltem)
Köszi, hogy szóltál!
infeeeee (2024-10-07 16:09:23+00:00): Jó lesz így, köszi, így kell jelölni a bezart üzleteket.

Még a facebook linket is törölheted, az oldal is megszűnt
infeeeee (2024-10-07 16:10:03+00:00): Vagyis nem jó, a sima shopot törölni kell mellőle, javítom
infeeeee (2024-10-07 16:10:53+00:00): Javítva: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157589346
Udarian (2024-08-30 05:05:51+00:00): you know you placed this inside of a post office. this means that this is almost certainly incorrectly placed. 

also what is the source for this commit?

Happy mapping,
Udar.
PartlyClouded (2024-08-30 14:34:48+00:00): Hello!  Yes, it is within the post office!  #348073. The source is the owner of the business — it’s on the website too.
Milhouse (2024-08-31 06:28:11+00:00): Hi Robert,
Is there a place I can look up what the waymap-project is?
I have been creating "unmarked crossings" in my local area in order to record the presence (or absence) of tactile paving and drop kerbs/flush crossings. I like the idea of OSM being able to help create pedestrian routes for people who depend on that infra.
rskedgell (2024-08-31 10:15:07+00:00): Hi Milhouse,

I add quite a lot of separate sidewalks and detailed crossings, because I also want effective routing for pedestrians and those with visual or mobility impairments.

The crossing tags I deleted were adding by inactive user @alisonlung (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6775 ). They were using a task manager on Waymap's site and were not supervised, adding decorative sidewalks and fictitious crossings which were detrimental to pedestrian routing. They also "accidentally" broke cycle routing in a few places with their edits. Many of the crossings they added were fictions connecting decorative and now deleted sidewalks.

18 months later, I am still cleaning up the mess they made. I have just reversed a rather heavy-handed bulk deletion of sidewalks around a part of Kensal Rise which I missed earlier. Discussion of this is on the community forum:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/undiscussed-mass-deletion-of-separate-sidewalks/117491

If you're interested in improving pedestrian routing in central London, this MapWithAI project may be of interest:
https://tasks.mapwith.ai/projects/165
Milhouse (2024-08-31 16:09:27+00:00): Hi again

I didn't mean to imply you were doing anything wrong, I've deleted at least one decorative sidewalk myself. There have been discussions in the talk-gb mailing list (are you on there?) about when it's appropriate to map them separately and when they just add clutter and no useful information. There's someone in Acton creating lots of decorative sidewalks and not joining them to roads too, which is really annoying to me but doesn't seem to be affecting routing at least. I had a look at that MapWithAI task but I don't like needlessly adding sidewalks when there's a reasonable assumption that there are pavements on both sides of the road.
Regarding unmarked crossings, I mapped the status of every street corner drop kerb and tactile paving within a couple of blocks of my home and being able to report on it in Overpass Turbo is really useful.
I've also tried using the pic4review site to create a mission for others to use Mapillary imagery to upgrade the tagging of other unmarked crossings (https://pic4review.pavie.info/#/mission/2738). Not sure about the data quality that comes out of that yet - you have to really check the mapillary image location to identify where in the picture (if at all) the referenced crossing is.
Is the forum more active than the mailing list?
Milhouse (2024-08-31 16:19:36+00:00): This is an example of a side road crossing I added. I think it gives enough information to a pedestrian router and in an imaginary situation (?) where you could tell a router "I'm in a wheelchair" it could slightly alter routes to avoid places where there are high kerbs.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/33965546
There are a small number of local residential roads where the sidewalk is only on one side or there are no sidewalks at all so I tag those, and I think that gives routers enough information to know where to tell pedestrians to go. (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/165299914 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/5052147)
Sorry, long comments for a changeset, maybe I should have contributed to the Community Forum thread!
user_16795792 (2024-08-30 14:52:32+00:00): Sen kimsin kafana göre kapatıyorsun? 
Cevap ver
SekeRob (2024-08-30 09:07:44+00:00): Hi,

ID got it wrong on crossings... crossing=* is to say what the type is, traffic_signal, uncontrolled, unmarked etc. Someone even inserted a line "crossing=marked (used by iD preset) - with crosswalk, with or without traffic lights", but that does not legitimize it... anyone can edit the wikis.
The crossing:marking is not =yes, it's meant to say e.g. zebra. It's like the many barrier=yes, which is meaningless.... barrier=gate/block/fence tells what they are. The root wiki actually says "crossing:markings=* - to tag the existence and style of pedestrian crossing markings"... zebra, rainbow, there's a whole bunch of esoteric styles, allowing to also add the colours of the markings.
In short now we have a bunch more BeeEs tagging combos from the ID automaton.... crossing=marked + crossing:markings=yes, doesn't look good, neither adding another version to the object history for nop.
One of the many reasons I very rarely use ID to include it's poor poor handling of relations in any form, but that's a debate of it's own and endless.

ciao ciao
damianeue (2024-08-30 13:47:58+00:00): Hi SekeRob, thank you for the clarification. I thought I was doing a good thing using the suggested tags -- I will fix it as soon as possible.
eggie (2024-08-29 19:36:59+00:00): Dag mhammie 

Various updates in Veenwouden / Feanwalden ?
 Geef svp concreet aan wat je hebt gedaan. Het wordt nu raden voor medemappers.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-08-29 19:53:02+00:00): Er is al een adresnode Svp geen adressen toevoegen aan de gebouw omtrek.
Het complex staat al op het vlak...  Ik zal de dubbele vermelding verwijderen.
Tip Kijk goed wat er al is. 
Go Map is geen ideale editor. Het genereert veel fouten.
Gebruik gewoon de webeditor en/of de beter editor JOSM.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-08-29 19:54:10+00:00): Dubbele tagging verwijderd
eggie (2024-08-29 19:45:51+00:00): Dag mhammie  De
eggie (2024-08-29 19:46:21+00:00): De jachthaven staat toch al op de kaart. Dat hoeft niet nog eens op een node.
MVG
eggie
nw520 (2024-09-04 09:50:40+00:00): Bild wurde auf Commons gelöscht.
nw520 (2024-09-04 09:49:48+00:00): Bitte verwende den name-tag nicht für deskriptive Beschreibungen von Objekten: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:name#Verwendung

Zudem wurde diese Bank im Gleisbett eingetragen, weshalb ich sie entfernt habe.
nw520 (2024-09-04 09:44:52+00:00): Revertiert. Bild wurde zwischenzeitlich auf Commons gelöscht.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-09-04 00:40:40+00:00): reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156163718
cuzi (2024-09-02 13:59:49+00:00): The spelling of theaddr:city value is wrong
wambacher (2024-09-04 12:51:42+00:00): erledigt (Brille geputzt)
eggie (2024-08-29 20:35:22+00:00): Dag crisu   Er loopt hier een officiele knooppuntwandelroute  75-77.  Die is nu onderbroken.
Hoe loopt die route dan? 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-08-29 20:40:01+00:00): Ik heb foot=permissive toegevoegd. Bij het hek staat volgens mij ook een bord met vrije wandeling over... enz.
Is die bebording er niet meer?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-08-29 20:41:21+00:00): Frei Wandern ist hier gestattet. Bitte keine Wanderroute sperren mit access=private.
Grüss,
eggie
crisu007 (2024-08-30 18:59:26+00:00): Hi eggie, das Tor im Süden ist zwar umgefallen, aber das beide Tore haben ein Schloss. Man kann zwar über den Zaun klettern, aber es ist Stacheldraht dran und deshalb nicht zu empfehlen. Liebe Grüße Christian
eggie (2024-08-30 19:06:34+00:00): Hoi Christian. Ahh Stacheldraht. Sieht nicht gut aus.
Ich werde es durchschicken zu den Wanderrouteexperts.
Danke für die Info.
eggie
Peter Elderson (2024-08-30 20:43:55+00:00): Wenn es einen Zaun gibt, ist es access=private und die Routeschilder ändern daran nichts. Normalerweise gibt es einen Zaunübertritt oder ein Drehkreuz, dann kann man davon ausgehen, dass man dort laufen darf, aber wenn nicht, hat der Spaziergänger Pech!
Dies kann bei "Meldpunt Wandelen" gemeldet werden und der Wanderroutenmanager wird das Problem lösen. Entweder durch erneuter access, oder durch eine Umleitung der Route.
Until then, I would remove this path from the route relation, which means that the OSM node network router (Knooppuntnet) will show it on the map, but will not use it for routing.
TrickyFoxy (2024-09-15 18:40:26+00:00): А что не так с https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1071763035 и соседними зданиями? Почему удалили их?
InsertUser (2024-08-29 22:23:25+00:00): The website cited in the source for the "protected area" says it is "©ProtectedPlanet 2014-2024. All rights reserved" 
Where is the waiver for OSM to use this data?
If there isn't one then I don't think it can be used as a source. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Copyright
jpeterson1346 (2024-08-30 14:35:16+00:00): https://www.protectedplanet.net/en/legal

I will remove it
InsertUser (2024-08-31 18:03:56+00:00): Thanks.
LennertS (2024-08-29 20:53:10+00:00): *updated route 30-50
archpdx (2024-08-30 08:11:55+00:00): Hi,
I noticed that this changeset adds shipping container stacks as buildings, which is not correct. Please note that we don't map temporary features like this in OSM
DavidKarlas (2024-09-02 19:21:04+00:00): Why change from admin_level=4 to admin_level=5? This is not in sync with https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3aboundary=administrative
marcknj (2024-09-02 19:24:59+00:00): Change to 5 since these regions do not fulfil any administrative function except the respective car plate numbers
jhaluska80 (2024-08-30 05:44:27+00:00): Nice job on that baseball field.  I wish more mappers had your precision.
eggie (2024-08-30 05:50:45+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-08-30 05:53:33+00:00): oneway=no is default. Het stond niet als eenrichtingsverkeer, maar op een paeallelpad is het wel handig om het toch toe te voegen. Dat voorkomt dat iemand oneway=yes gaat taggen.

MVG
eggie
JGHCrp (2024-09-03 06:48:08+00:00): Dank voor het warme welkom. Ik meende op de kaart te zien dat het pad eenrichtingsverkeer was, vandaar. Ik werd er afgelopen donderdag ook niet overheen geleid van west naar oost.
Groeten, Joost
eggie (2024-09-03 06:53:10+00:00): Joost. Zal zo nog even kijken of er meer aan de hand is.
Groet..
eggie
eggie (2024-09-03 07:14:51+00:00): OSRM heeft er moeite mee in beide richtingen.
Maar waarom?  Met de Openfietsmap en in andere routingapps gaat het wel goed.
Het is overigens nooit eenrichtingsverkeer hier geweest. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_bike&route=52.059628%2C5.122579%3B52.060024%2C5.129092#map=18/52.059624/5.126329

Met OSRM foot werkt het ook niet. foot=yes hoeft overigens ook niet op fietspaden.

Maar je ziet wel meer merkwaardige zaken bij OSRM momenteel.
Welke routing app gaat de mist in en gebruik je?

Gr eggie
eggie (2024-09-03 07:19:48+00:00): oneway=yes heb ik weer verwijderd. Er zaten geen fouten in de tagging. Het zou gewoon moeten routeren. 
Een raadsel dus.
Zal eens op het forum vragen of ik iets over het hoofd zie.
eggie (2024-09-03 07:23:15+00:00): Even aangesloten aan dit draadje https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/osrm-navigatie-is-van-slag/116019/4
JGHCrp (2024-09-03 07:48:09+00:00): Ik gebruik Organic Maps op de iPhone
JGHCrp (2024-09-03 07:49:51+00:00): Als ik een looproute instel ipv een fietsroute gaat het wel goed. Dankzij dat heb ik niet om hoeven fietsen :-)
eggie (2024-09-03 08:08:01+00:00): Oke... maar welke routingengine zal organic maps gebruiken?
Wellicht weet iemand op het forum dat.
eggie (2024-09-03 08:52:14+00:00): Opgelost... Tjuro ontdekte dat er een klein stukje op vehicle=destination stond. Dat heeft hij aangepast naar motor_vehicle.
Scherp gezien.
eggie (2024-09-03 08:53:04+00:00): Nu even afwachten wanneer Organic z'n update doorvoert.
JGHCrp (2024-10-31 17:13:08+00:00): Helaas, de fietsroute in OpenStreetMap leidt nog steeds om dit tunneltje heen (onder de waterlinieweg heen), ondanks meerdere updates sinds dit draadje
eggie (2024-10-31 17:17:38+00:00): Hardnekkig... zal straks nog eens kijken.
eggie (2024-10-31 17:49:49+00:00): Ik zie geen fouten.
Wel hebben sommige (fiets)routeplanners moeite met highway=service  Ik heb er highway=unclassified van gemaakt. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-10-31 17:51:48+00:00): In alle routeplanners werkt het gewoon. Ook op de Openfietsmap. Vorige keer stond dat kleine stukje op vehicle=destination. Dat is eerder opgelost.
eggie (2024-10-31 17:55:06+00:00): https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/osrm-navigatie-is-van-slag/116019/11

Suggesties van forum doorgevoerd
mga_geo (2024-09-23 11:47:57+00:00): Christian,
Il n'y a plus aucune voie à l'ouest de la gare et de mon fauteuil je ne peux pas cartographier.
Dès que cela sera fait, je mettrai à jour les bus.
Marc
ChRogel (2024-09-23 19:31:38+00:00): Marc, Plus aucune voie à l’Ouest ? Justement, là, rien n’a changé excepté le côté N (parkings et stationnements longitudinal). Aucune ligne QUB ne passe par la gare routière et les BreizhGo vont toutes vers le centre ville à l’Est ou en viennent. Le Flixbus lui s’arrête à et repart  de la nelle gare.
mga_geo (2024-09-24 21:14:32+00:00): De la gare routière, il n'y a qu'un accès au sud-est vers l'avenue de la Libération, c'est bien cela ?
oiooio (2024-11-06 14:40:55+00:00): Siehe Kommentar zu https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155948632

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158821261
oiooio (2024-10-23 11:50:11+00:00): Hallo axm8,

du hast in diesem Changeset einen großen Teil des Weges entlang der Nidda als Fahrradweg deklariert. Das entspricht mindestens auf dem Stück zwischen Staden und Assenheim ausnahmslos nirgendwo der Wahrheit.

Alle Wege sind auch für Fußgänger bestimmt (also keine exklusiven Fahrradwege), zwischen der Basaltstraße in Nieder-Florstadt und der Kläranlage bei Wickstadt ist der Weg mWn eine ganz normale Zufahrtsstraße, die auch von LKWs benutzt wird. Entlang der B 275 zwischen Ober-Florstadt und Staden befindet sich ein geteilter Rad- und Fußweg.

Ich bitte dich die Situation nochmal vor Ort zu prüfen und das Tagging entsprechend anzupassen (siehe dazu https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway=cycleway?uselang=de#Deutschland). Falls das nicht möglich sein sollte sei doch so gut und stelle den Ursprungszustand wieder her.

Falls du anderer Meinung bist, wäre ich auch an dieser sehr interessiert :)

Viele Grüße
oiooio
oiooio (2024-11-06 13:20:06+00:00): Hallo axm8,
da du nach zwei Wochen nicht geantwortet hast gehe ich davon aus, dass keine Korrektur deinerseits mehr erfolgen wird. Daher reverte ich den Changeset.

Viele Grüße
oiooio

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158817943
literan (2024-11-01 07:34:52+00:00): зачем вы на подъезды к АЗС ставите тег service=driveway (да еще не на все куски, что обрывки висят)? 

это тег для подъездной дороги самого низшего уровнял, например, к индивидуальному дому или даче
Fantomas (2024-11-05 08:05:29+00:00): Вероятно, скопировал из како-нибудь похожего соседнего way.
kitsee (2024-08-29 22:09:41+00:00): Hi there Nathan,
Could you please provide a source for the overtaking restriction. On imagery, the road appears to have a broken centre line, allowing overtaking.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/155948958
Nathan_A_RF (2024-08-29 22:25:35+00:00): While there is a broken centre line, there are also overtaking prohibition signs along the A5 through Pentrefoelas, corresponding with the 40 limit extent.
kitsee (2024-09-08 15:15:17+00:00): Hi Nathan,
thanks for the info, sorry I didn't get back to you in a while. If that's the case I would recommend adding `traffic_sign:forward=overtaking overtaking=no` to the start and end nodes of the restriction to make this clear. obviously changing `forward` to `backward` for the 2nd node.
JeffMaps (2025-08-30 13:18:29+00:00): As part of this changeset a way #1312109595 was added in the Assabet Wildlife Refuge paralleling "Patrol Road" with a link out to Sudbury Rd by Woodland Way. This is in a area closed to public access (essentially all of the refuge west of White Pond Trail) . Is there some reason you marked this as open to all? Does this trail even exist or is it just a misplaced version of Patrol Road?
MassCartog (2025-09-01 01:56:30+00:00): Hi Jeff, Yes way 1312109595 exists on the ground, it is running paralleling to the Patrol Road. If you have reason to believe it's closed to the public, feel free to update the access tags. I didn't see a sign, but I might have missed it. It shows a lot of activity in the last 12 months. https://i.imgur.com/IZfrdgF.png
olo81 (2024-08-31 17:31:06+00:00): brakuje tagu:
maxspeed=50 + source:maxspeed=PL:urban


https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:maxspeed
IreuN (2024-09-01 09:05:47+00:00): Poprawiłem :)
pitfire (2024-08-30 04:47:31+00:00): Hi Tom van Dijk,

parking=surface requires a path, otherwise it is parking=street_side

VG pitfire
Tom van Dijk (2024-08-30 08:47:43+00:00): Thank you, I'll correct it.
Tom van Dijk (2024-08-30 08:50:33+00:00): Nevermind, you already did. Thank you for helping.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-09-25 05:50:26+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12145050174/history has shop = hotel that was added in this edit
shop=hotel ? Is it a mistagged hotel? Maybe it should be https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dhotel ? Is it a place selling hotel equipment (in such case shop=trade trade=hotel_equipment would be likely better and more clear) ? Something else?
literan (2024-08-31 09:55:49+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/55.791392/37.694309 здесь вы видимо случайно удалили полигон landuse=residential. Попробую восстановить
GretaMN (2024-09-08 13:00:41+00:00): Liebe franzista,
bitte füge noch eine Angabe zu lit=* und surface=* hinzu, falls du diese aufgenommen hast.
Danke! :)
#lgmaps
Arlo James Barnes (2024-09-02 16:14:47+00:00): Thanks!
GretaMN (2024-09-08 12:43:14+00:00): Liebe franzista,
bei einem DE:240er Schild bitte sowohl bicycle/foot=designated taggen (siehe https://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/). Bitte auch hier das Schild (traffic_sign=*) an der Linie ergänzen. Die Breite des Weges sieht auf deinen Mapillary Bildern überwiegend gleichbleibend aus, diese kannst du dann am besten nur mit width=* angeben. Ich frage mich gerade, ob der class:bicycle Extremwert von 3 hier neben der K19 gerechfertigt ist. Vielleicht kannst du das nochmal prüfen. Das wirst du aber besser beurteilen können als ich, weil du ja dort warst. :)
LG, Greta
#lgmaps
GretaMN (2024-09-08 12:43:56+00:00): P.S. Der Kommentar bezieht sich auf diesen Weg: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1312115039
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-08-31 23:48:38+00:00): Why all the destination, ref and name tag deletions?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/155950417
itzshoummo (2024-09-01 00:03:52+00:00): because I used destination and turn lanes, which is a more acceptable form on important highway junctions
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-09-01 02:57:31+00:00): Based on what?
itzshoummo (2024-09-01 10:19:54+00:00): on the Wiki
felipeeugenio (2024-08-30 14:28:19+00:00): Hola. Borró un camino completo. Cuidado con eso.
Además, por favor no usar nombres descriptivos.
Buenas ediciones en todo caso.

saludos y gracias.
tastrax (2024-08-30 02:30:57+00:00): Welcome to OSM and thanks for your first edit! If you would like to know more about how us aussies tag things then head over to here for some guidance on common tags - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines
Fizzie-DWG (2024-09-19 03:33:48+00:00): Reverted by DWG - apparent vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156800116
Fizzie-DWG (2024-09-19 03:33:49+00:00): Reverted by DWG - apparent vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156800116
nickswalker (2024-08-30 04:20:17+00:00): Thanks for sprucing this! In case you are planning more edits to it: I've noticed that the network tag is used inconsistently across the system.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/155951986
Lumikeiju (2024-08-30 21:06:35+00:00): I'm happy to contribute! Thanks for highlighting the tagging inconsistencies; I think I've addressed them for the most part in Changeset: 155992111.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155992111

Happy mapping!
pantufla (2024-10-10 17:40:06+00:00): Hola, no deberíamos poner el nombre ruta sin salida, eso se deduciría viendo que el elemento en todo caso.
GretaMN (2024-09-07 14:32:10+00:00): Liebe:r franzista,
bitte ergänze noch fehlende class:bicycle Werte (z.B. hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/26924874) für ein vollstängiges LG Maps Tagging.
Danke! LG, Greta
#lgmaps
franzista (2024-09-07 20:58:31+00:00): Hallo Greta,
muss class:bicycle=0 auch getaggt werden? Ich habe den Wert hier weggelassen, da in der Ausfüllhilfe steht, dass man 0 nicht taggen muss.
LG, Franzi
GretaMN (2024-09-08 09:44:01+00:00): Hey Franzi,
ein class:bicycle Wert von 0 wird mit folgendermaßen getaggt: class:bicycle:description=Wert 0 nach LGMaps-Schema ermittelt, daher nicht gesetzt. Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities/LGMaps. So wird deutlich gemacht, dass du den class:bicycle Wert geprüft hast und sich daraus keine Bevorzugung oder ein Vermeiden des Weges ergibt.
LG, Greta
#lgmaps
clay_c (2024-11-06 23:24:17+00:00): Changeset partially reverted here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158836719
canfe (2024-08-30 06:31:03+00:00): Non sarebbe bene segnare tutti i changeset con "road infrastructure" è come non scrivere nulla.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/155952490
WilliamHarrison (2024-08-30 08:23:57+00:00): "road infrastructure" = “infrastruttura stradale”

in generale significa ”change:lanes:*" , "turn:lanes:*", "lanes:*"
o la geometria della strada
nient'altro
tastrax (2024-08-31 06:32:40+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, +61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features#Phone_Numbers .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
N7EKB (2024-08-31 03:31:12+00:00): Complete name is "The Krusteaz Company".  They changed their name from Continental Mills in September 2022.
fortera_au (2024-08-30 05:58:42+00:00): I've been slowly working on bits and pieces of this, absolutely amazing effort on smashing this out!
Just curious, are you grabbing addresses while walking around the area and then taking home to upload? I've been resorting to mapping houses and then doing addresses with StreetComplete or Every Door.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/155953974
kether924 (2024-09-02 05:27:24+00:00): Thanks!! Been chipping away at this for a while since learning the ropes with JOSM.

Addresses were combination of just writing down while out to then correlate later, using location.sa.gov.au's address/lot map view, and street-level imagery. Will have to check out those apps.