piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ChromeLotus (2024-05-07 19:22:31+00:00): Hello, evgeniyakz! 
You've recently made many edits to the destination tags of highways across Kazakhstan, but it appears that the information you're adding is in Russian instead of Kazakh, which, as far as I can tell, is the language on the signs. For example, in this changeset you used "destination=Алма-Ата" instead of "destination=Алматы" on two ways (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/122669176 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/376257852). I've found pictures from elsewhere in the country that show Khazakh on street signs, not Russian (https://yandex.com/maps/?l=stv%2Csta&ll=76.755104%2C43.177543&panorama%5Bdirection%5D=98.652738%2C-1.323444&panorama%5Bfull%5D=true&panorama%5Bpoint%5D=76.752798%2C43.177879&panorama%5Bspan%5D=49.182883%2C25.878587&z=19).

The OSM wiki states that: "the value of the destination tag should be the contents of the sign" and "This key is only for values which are explicitly indicated on signposts or ground writings," (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:destination#Value). If you have any resources that show that these types of signs are printed in Russian as well as Kazakh, I'd appreciate it if you could share them, otherwise I may overwrite these edits to better follow the editing practices laid down in the OSM wiki and ensure consistent mapping in Kazakhstan. Thank you, and I'm looking forward to hearing back from you.

--Automatic Translation-- (in Kazakh)

Сәлем, evgeniyakz!
Жақында сіз Қазақстан бойынша автомагистральдардың тағайындалу белгілеріне көптеген түзетулер енгіздіңіз, бірақ сіз қосып жатқан ақпарат қазақша емес, орыс тілінде жазылған сияқты, менің білуімше, белгілердегі тіл. Мысалы, бұл өзгерістер жинағында сіз екі жолмен (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/122669176 және https://www.openstreetmap.org/) "destination=Алматы" орнына "destination=Алма-Ата" сөзін қолдандыңыз. жол/376257852). Мен елдің басқа жерінен орысша емес, көше маңдайшаларында қазақша жазылған суреттерді таптым (https://yandex.com/maps/?l=stv%2Csta&ll=76.755104%2C43.177543&panorama%5Bdirection%5D=98.652738%2C -1,323444&panorama%5Bfull%5D=true&panorama%5Bpoint%5D=76,752798%2C43,177879&panorama%5Bspan%5D=49,182883%2C25,878587&z=19).

OSM викиде былай делінген: «тағайындалған тегтің мәні белгінің мазмұны болуы керек» және «Бұл кілт тек жол белгілерінде немесе жердегі жазбаларда анық көрсетілген мәндерге арналған», (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org /wiki/Кілт:дестинация#Мән). Егер сізде бұл белгілердің орыс және қазақ тілдерінде басылғанын көрсететін қандай да бір ресурстарыңыз болса, оларды бөліссеңіз, мен ризамын, әйтпесе OSM викиде көрсетілген өңдеу әдістерін жақсырақ орындау үшін осы өңдеулерді қайта жазуым мүмкін. және Қазақстанда бірізді карта жасауды қамтамасыз ету. Рахмет, мен сізден жауап күтемін.
VLD549 (2024-05-24 06:35:45+00:00): Hi, both the site and FB page indicate the name to be vzw De Droomboom. Could you explain why we should change it to De Droomboom vzw?

Thank you in advance.
Eebie (2024-05-24 08:23:35+00:00): vzw is de afkorting van de juridische vorm van de vereniging en niet de naam.  Op een kaart is het beter om eerst de naam te zien en dan nog zonder het lidwoord. Voor de juiste, officiële zie de publicatie in het Belgisch Staatsblad https://www.ejustice.just.fgov.be/tsv_pdf/2014/03/20/14302728.pdf
VLD549 (2024-06-09 07:02:14+00:00): Ok, bedankt!
benoitdd (2024-04-29 09:19:36+00:00): bonjour, je ne comprend pas pourquoi tu as supprimé la piste cyclable en construction, pourtant visible sur l'imagerie Esri?
MissMarcoPolo (2024-04-25 18:57:08+00:00): Correction: Source used was Esri World Imagery; Bing Streetside.
MxxCon (2024-04-26 21:58:39+00:00): Hello.
Is there website, phone number, biz hours?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150510074
silversurfer83 (2024-04-25 20:35:51+00:00): Hi :)

Kommt hin, mit der Lorfe. Mach mal das ALKIS als Hintergrund, dann siehst du mehr.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150510595
charl3s (2024-06-20 10:19:56+00:00): Dlaczego pozmieniałeś drogi highway=service prowadzące do zabudowań na track? To poważny błąd
charl3s (2024-06-20 10:23:37+00:00): tu masz przykłąd jak wtedy routingi świrują. 
Niestety w OSM pełno dojazdów do zabudowań oznaczonych jako track, bo tak kiedyś mapowali. Niestety to spory błąd, który poprawiam.

Tu masz przykład jak ten błąd jest poważny: https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_car&route=52.0769%2C23.0499%3B52.0690%2C23.0673#map=13/52.0569/23.0629
charl3s (2024-06-20 10:24:14+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_car&route=52.0772%2C23.0500%3B52.0649%2C23.0710
MaciekMma (2024-06-20 11:07:21+00:00): Dzieki za info z konkretnymi przykladami. Znam roznice miedzy track i service, ale nie zdawalem sobie sprawy ze konsekwencje sa tak powazne dla nawigacji.

Wskazane przez Ciebie drogi faktycznie nastreczaly mi problemow z decyzja. Odnioslem wrazenie ze granica miedzy service i track w wiki osm jest raczej miekka ("nie powinno sie", ale "czasami mozna"). Mozliwe ze ostatecznie zmapowalem zle. Badam teren na rowerze i pewnie nie jestem obiektywny.

Zdjecia sa nieaktualne. Dojazd do tych gospodarstw realizowany jest raczej od polnocy, a nie od poludnia (od wiaduktu na A2).

Wieczorem poprawie, chyba ze chcesz samodzielnie to droga wolna.
MaciekMma (2024-06-20 11:15:05+00:00): Patrzac jeszcze raz na podrzucone przez Ciebie przyklady musze przyznac, ze nawigacja z OSM dziala beznadziejnie. Niby czmu nie prowadzi po track skoro to jedyna mozliwosc zeby dojechac z punktu A do B? Ma nawet wskazany surface i tracktype. Apki rowerowe i samochodowe oparte o OSM (jak np. Yanosik) nie maja z tym zadnego problemu.
MaciekMma (2024-06-20 11:19:22+00:00): Poprawilem, jak nadal zle to smialo zmieniaj.
charl3s (2024-06-20 12:01:12+00:00): Yanosik właśnie najgorzej toleruje tracki, praktycznie ich nie używa. 
Za duże ryzyko, że track to jakaś droga z której trzeba będzie wyciągać traktorem.
Większość nawigacji/routingów dla samochodów omija track lub toleruje grade1, grade 2, ale wagi dla tych dróg i tak przeważnie są bardzo wysoko ustawione że ponawiguje naokoło innymi drogami. 


Nawigacje rowerowe nie robią problemu, bo rowerem nie ma takiego ryzyka
MaciekMma (2024-06-20 18:02:46+00:00): Ok, dzieki za garsc przydatnych informacji.
Xvtn (2024-04-30 03:21:55+00:00): Thanks for your contribution! Since you added access=no, does that mean access is physically blocked, or it's legally not allowed, or did you intend some other meaning there?
jdpackman (2024-04-30 03:25:58+00:00): I indicated that all access is not allowed. This trail is for foot and bicycle only. No motorized vehicles allowed and no horses allowed (it is a new cut and horses would ruin the trail).
jdpackman (2024-04-30 03:28:10+00:00): I see that there was the attribute "access" that was set to no. I changed that.
b-unicycling (2024-04-29 16:03:06+00:00): would leisure=swimming_area maybe be more appropriate?
wolfbert (2025-05-03 14:14:21+00:00): Hallo, bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/22796267 hast Du maxspeed:advised gesetzt. Korrekt wäre maxspeed:advisory. Was war denn da gemeint, steht da ein Schild oder ist es Deine Einschätzung (dann maxspeed:practical)?
wolfbert (2025-05-14 09:14:57+00:00): Bei näherem Hinsehen wäre ich dafür, maxspeed da völlig zu entfernen, ist ja highway=service, da braucht's das eigentlich gar nicht. Ich hab jetzt das jetzt mal sinngemäß geändert, wenn Du nicht einverstanden bist, kannst Du es ja anpassen.
b-unicycling (2024-04-29 19:07:14+00:00): Did you mean to add leisure=swimming_area?
Tex2002ans (2024-06-02 01:36:30+00:00): Hello Aniya.

Thanks for adding these small churches/houses to the area! :)

Do you happen to live near here?

- Is this church named "Mooresburg Presbyterian Church"?

(I found their Facebook page, so was able to add a little more info to it.)

- - -

Note: And I also saw you drew 10 houses in the area, but accidentally named them "house" + "home" + "large house".

There's no need to do that.

In the upper-left dropdown, as long as you pick:

- House

that will categorize them correctly. :)

Another trick, after you draw the shape of the house, is to:

- Press 'Q' on your keyboard.

That will "square" the shape, so the building won't have all sorts of wobbly + weird edges.
Silvio Kennecke (2024-04-25 20:05:42+00:00): Re added the change with official source from operator in https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16476538
tekim (2024-04-25 20:13:33+00:00): Thank you!
wkdgs (2024-04-29 07:45:38+00:00): Ich glaube die Beschreibung kannst du entfernen. Das wird ja schon durch die access-Tags ausgedrückt.

Da du keine spezielle Regelung für Fahrradfahrer angegeben hast, gilt für die aktuell access=no.

Spricht etwas dagegen hier einfach access=customers anzugeben?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150512113
wkdgs (2024-04-29 07:43:54+00:00): Es gibt noch ein paar Tags, die die Situation hier genauer beschreiben könnten.

Z.B. service=emergency_access, wenn es ein reiner Rettungsweg ist. Oder access=no und emergency=designated, wenn dort nur Rettungsfahrzeuge langfahren dürfen.

Kannst du vielleicht einmal schauen, was hier passt?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:service%3Demergency_access
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:emergency
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150512160
ivanbranco (2024-04-27 23:20:57+00:00): Does it exist tho?
gegelekeke (2024-04-28 12:01:14+00:00): Hi! I created this for my community so I couldn't check for myself but I specified it needs to be real and justifiable. According to the photo provided I believe this can be accepted: https://maps.app.goo.gl/eaaPMhNV4vDZrn4D6
b-unicycling (2024-04-29 19:04:50+00:00): You cannot use google as a reference.
Probertp (2024-04-25 21:48:52+00:00): Foto:
https://forumfoto.mtbiker.sk/784085_vazska-cyklotrasa-usek-trencin-puchov-hranica-tsk_662ac56ec1f88.jpg?_gl=1*1naps1r*_ga*MTk0NjkzMzAxOS4xNzExNTU5NDE2*_ga_TBFE68JSK0*MTcxNDA3OTA1Mi4yNi4xLjE3MTQwODAzNzQuNTUuMC4w*_ga_R4HK54DK2E*MTcxNDA3OTA1My4yNi4xLjE3MTQwODAzNzQuNTYuMC4w

https://forumfoto.mtbiker.sk/784085_vazska-cyklotrasa-usek-trencin-puchov-hranica-tsk_662ac609b15fc.jpg?_gl=1*217b1s*_ga*MTk0NjkzMzAxOS4xNzExNTU5NDE2*_ga_TBFE68JSK0*MTcxNDA3OTA1Mi4yNi4xLjE3MTQwODE1ODEuNjAuMC4w*_ga_R4HK54DK2E*MTcxNDA3OTA1My4yNi4xLjE3MTQwODE1ODEuNjAuMC4w
Osmwithspace (2025-02-06 14:00:26+00:00): Du hast um ein Review gebeten? Soll ich hier nach etwas bestimmten schauen?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150512459
VLD549 (2024-06-25 10:12:19+00:00): Hi, just to be sure, could you indicate the source that was used for the name change Roomboomdijk to Roonboomdijk?
It seems that Roomboomdijk is used on all sources I found, BAG, Bing Maps, Allecijfers.nl, etc.

Thank you!
map per (2024-04-26 20:00:04+00:00): Wegen review_requested:
Die Änderung sieht gut aus, danke!
Frans S (2024-04-26 09:32:37+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Please pay attention how to tag the highways in this area.
Often very narrow (<2 mtr wide) which should be tagged as 'path' 
Tracks never connect buildings and settlements.
See the article about it

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150513005
Adelino Felisberto (2024-05-08 21:17:24+00:00): Adelino Felisberto filho de Ângela Felisberto mora na hidromina ao lado do IGEO
Jochen Topf (2024-04-29 08:03:05+00:00): I am not happy with this change turning the whole atoll of Tikehau into an island. There is not one massive island here, but many islands. Each of those islands has its coastline tagged already, so tagging natural=coastline in Way 1276228955 is wrong in my opinion.
Taya_S (2024-04-29 08:39:35+00:00): This is blatantly incorrect. This is not at all how the island and coastline tags are to be used and this area was also already mapped here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/139162465

I have deleted the coastline/island way in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150651004

Sincerely,
Taya
Taya_S (2024-04-29 08:45:16+00:00): The natural=reef that has been added to way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/139162465 is also incorrect, as it overlaps with all of the islands. What was wrong with the natural=atoll that it was tagged as before?
Jrachi (2024-04-26 07:35:59+00:00): Perché hai cancellato due way a Villa di Verzuolo?
Un errore?


Ivo
Roberto Beltritti (2024-04-26 12:58:52+00:00): Errore. Grazie
Roberto Beltritti (2024-04-26 12:59:42+00:00): Come posso ripristinare?
CurlingMan13 (2024-04-27 06:03:38+00:00): Please do not overlap building areas.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150513994
Filip009 (2024-04-26 09:49:51+00:00): Zdravím, prečo ste odstránil tie web stránky?
JozefKascak (2024-04-26 11:01:18+00:00): Pretoze chram patri greckokatolickej farnosti, stranky odkazovali na rimskokatolicku farnost ... link dokostola.sk vratim, predpokladal som, ze tiez odkazuje na rk kostol ... moja chyba
Filip009 (2024-04-26 11:56:06+00:00): Neviem, na ktorý chrám odkazoval, ale pred tým než niečo vymažete, prosím skontrolujte. Najlepšie je, keď ho viete nahradiť nejakým aktuálnym, alebo súvisiacim, pokiaľ ním nebol ten predošlý.

Vďaka :)
NorthCrab_upload (2024-04-25 21:20:20+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/423281161

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
user_3107993 (2024-04-25 21:48:36+00:00): Hello andrewpmk,

Please use meaningful changeset comments - “Poi” does not help other mappers understand what you are doing.

Thank you,
grrla
Dawid2849 (2024-05-01 10:58:43+00:00): Dzięki za posprzątanie błędnej edycji w Radomiu. Właśnie wycofałem resztę, bo cały zestaw zmian był błędny.
Spiekerooger (2024-04-25 21:58:17+00:00): Looking at the satellite image I don't see a wood in this form otg. Nice art though but please do not enter "artwork" into the map that is not reflecting what is on the ground. Yes, there are a few trees but not a heart-shaped wood. Would you revert this changeset? Thank you.
b-unicycling (2024-05-01 16:09:28+00:00): Maybe leisure=swimming_area would be more appropriate, if this really is the case? The surface does not seem to fall under the definition on the wiki.
Quasimodo (2024-04-26 07:21:42+00:00): Danke für die Anpassung. OT: Können eigtl. alle Telefonzellen gelöscht werden? Dann würde ich das tun.
Bienson (2024-04-27 22:45:47+00:00): Nur wenn sie abgebaut wurden. Stehen sie noch, sind aber nicht mehr funktionsfähig, ist disused:amenity=telephone anstatt amenity=telephone korrekt.
Quasimodo (2024-04-29 08:27:08+00:00): Ah ok. Habe ich so getagged bis auf die an der Wenzelstr., die wird grad abgerissen und daher gelöscht.
akimapbuilder (2024-04-26 06:51:39+00:00): You draw building over backyard, try to avoid that. Thanks
cucunto (2024-04-26 07:01:56+00:00): “Prima di cambiare l’ordine del doppio nome ufficiale, avviare un dibattito sul forum della community italiana: https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/it/60”
Cookie Guru (2025-02-25 19:19:18+00:00): @lukobe What is your source for this?  Way 1276246620 is just somebody's yard
lukobe (2025-02-25 19:38:24+00:00): It's public right of way
Cookie Guru (2025-02-27 19:23:51+00:00): Thank you.  I have verified with the county plat map: https://aqua.kingcounty.gov/assessor/emap/InternetPDF/qs_SE102503.pdf that it is indeed public.  I visited the location last night, and the nearby homeowner has landscaped the public ROW to make it appear as private property
cucunto (2024-04-26 07:05:26+00:00): “Prima di cambiare l’ordine del doppio nome ufficiale, avviare un dibattito sul forum della community italiana: https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/it/60”
NeisBot (2024-05-05 08:04:03+00:00): Hello いjhdいjhd, thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.Please see https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 

Thanks!

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
Taya_S (2024-05-07 12:28:38+00:00): Hi いjhdいjhd,

Cliffs are not beaches. I have removed the more obvious fake ones. I'd also recommend you to please take a little more care when mapping. The mapping is very rough and inaccurate. A lot of ways had a lot of geometry issues with them and also do not seem to take existing ways in to account at all.

Lastly, since this is likely Pokemon Go inspired. Adding beaches does not work, they wont appear on Pokemon go anytime soon.

Sincerely,
Taya
woodpeck_repair (2024-04-25 22:21:43+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 150500460, 150500894, 150502052, 150502244, 150504309.
cucunto (2024-04-26 07:02:00+00:00): “Prima di cambiare l’ordine del doppio nome ufficiale, avviare un dibattito sul forum della community italiana: https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/it/60”
eggie (2024-04-26 05:41:08+00:00): Dag Gret..
Je hebt amenity pub laten staan?
Mvg
Eggie
eggie (2024-04-26 09:54:30+00:00): Pub verwijderd
gr eggie
rskedgell (2024-04-26 07:54:58+00:00): Thanks for updating these.

As you asked for a review, I would suggest that rather than adding disused:shop=yes as a new tag, you add the disused: lifecycle prefix to the existing shop or amenity tag.

The documentation on lifecycle prefixes is on the wiki here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
citrula (2024-04-26 11:54:10+00:00): Hello, I have reverted your edits because you moved an existing POI. Please be careful in your edits. Also, it looks like you have set an entire building of the strip mall to your business - is that the case?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150535243
cafacame (2024-04-26 17:33:58+00:00): No he podido ver los cambios bien marcados en el mapa, no se si algo me quedó mal al subir los cambios o si seria la señal
Dimacn (2024-04-26 06:01:36+00:00): Наверное проспект Космонавтов
KhoraKavat (2024-04-26 07:03:32+00:00): Спасибо! Поправлю
AntMadeira (2024-04-26 10:45:49+00:00): Olá, Jota.
Bem-vindo ao OpenStreetMap.
Reparei que tens estado a atualizar o Castelo de Óbidos e os seus elementos.
Aconselho-te a ler esta página [1], pois tem muita informação útil. Por exemplo, Barbacã não deve ser usado no nome, mas sim com etiquetas próprias que identifiquem essa muralha como uma barbacã, neste caso, e segundo a página wiki, deveria ser defensive_works=barbican.


Qualquer dúvida, estou ao dispor.
Também tens o canal Telegram da comunidade portuguesa [2], onde poderás aprender mais, tirar dúvidas e colocar questões.
Continuação do bom trabalho!

Cumprimentos,
António Madeira.

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:defensive_works
[2] https://t.me/OSMPortugal
Jota Cartas (2025-07-09 02:41:54+00:00): Viva  António Madeira, 
Desculpe só responder agora, mas os mails da OSM estavam a ir todos para SPAM. Já fiz a alteração no Castelo de Óbidos conforme indicado.

Cumprimentos,
João Lemos
Jordi MF (2024-04-26 07:43:02+00:00): Las calles sí que están en bilingüe. El Aytunamiento lo publicó hace años en dos notas de prensa:
https://www.aguaviva.es/2018/10/05/aguaviva-comienza-a-rotular-los-nombres-de-sus-calles-con-su-toponimia-bilingue/

https://www.aguaviva.es/2021/02/20/aguaviva-completa-la-rotulacion-bilingue-en-las-calles-de-la-localidad/

Algunas imágenes de los nombres bilingües que aparecen en las notas de prensa:
https://ibb.co/wd6CWF6
https://ibb.co/x2x6CyV
https://ibb.co/pZ5cDYG
https://ibb.co/KG5dyJQ
NeisBot (2024-05-05 05:34:03+00:00): Hello 蛋白质先生, thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.Please see https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 

Thanks!

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
Ewrt1 (2024-04-26 01:03:17+00:00): Oh great. Hello Evpac, again. I'll see if this edit will give good stuff to this map or damage its integrity.
KevinOs (2024-04-26 16:36:15+00:00): Hey dude, just a heads up in the western provinces the Loblaws franchise stores are branded as "Real Canadian Superstore" we don't have "Loblaws" branding here even if they are all part of the same company. if you don't mind fixing up in your next edits.

Thanks for taking some of the prior suggestions to heart on your edits to help them be valuable to everyone.
zstadler (2025-04-15 08:26:07+00:00): Hello LockOnGuy,

Thank you for your contributions to OSM!

Please avoid adding historic elements that do exist any more.

See 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_map_historic_events_and_historic_features
fortera_au (2024-04-26 04:28:58+00:00): Hey there, if this isn't a platform are you able to fix up the tagging indicating it as such? I'd double check to make sure that it's not used in any relations or that it's correctly replaced if so.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150518235
fortera_au (2024-04-26 04:25:44+00:00): Hi, bus=yes isn't just used for bus routes. If this is a valid bus platform, it should include bus=yes to indicate what type of public transport uses it.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bus%3Dyes
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150519173
fortera_au (2024-05-20 22:45:24+00:00): Hi imccredie, I've reviewed these all, and they were tagged correctly. If your data consumer is treating these as routes, there is an issue with the data consumer as they are all tagged as platforms with area=yes as well.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151603042
clay_c (2024-05-05 16:50:00+00:00): Hi jakTTU2020,

Your changes here caught the attention of another mapper when they noticed "SH" was changed back to "TX" on certain segments of State Highway 195. There's now an ongoing discussion of which one should be considered correct. I invite you to join in if you have any opinions or insights.

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/should-ref-for-texas-state-highways-begin-with-tx-or-sh/112783/11
Supaplex (2024-04-27 03:05:06+00:00): 邱外科醫院
 院址：高雄市苓雅區成功一路137號　
總機：(07)336-4131
https://www.chiuhospital.com.tw/
csomerville (2024-05-05 13:51:05+00:00): Please consider being specific and explicit in your changeset descriptions.

Providing detailed descriptions ensures that other mappers can understand the rationale behind alterations and contribute effectively. As an example, the changeset you reverted had a notably more informative description: "Added road name 'North Highway 183'. Source - North American Roads and user feedback. #mapbox_contribute."

Please consider offering similarly informative descriptions in your changesets, as it greatly aids in maintaining clarity and collaboration among mappers.