piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
vectorial8192 (2026-06-02 03:32:43+00:00): Hi there, regarding https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13900375612 , perhaps the name:zh and name:en data can be put into the description.
samho1234567 (2026-06-02 13:31:05+00:00): It's my typo again. Inconsistent name of `name:zh` and `name`. Feel free to amend directly.
vectorial8192 (2026-06-02 15:33:41+00:00): Got it; done by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183552604
TheSwavu (2026-06-02 22:57:39+00:00): Hello,

You only need to map things once. I have removed the tagging you added to the building. If you need to change details then please do that on n13900391003.

Thank you.
rajdhani (2026-06-02 09:26:32+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: 183536547
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-23 08:21:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856
World_Winner (2026-06-03 04:51:30+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: 183572324
Marek-M (2026-06-01 07:13:56+00:00): 'Bezpłatny' to nie nazwa parkingu. Zamiast tego powinno się użyć tagu `fee=no`. Poza tym ten parking jest już na mapie jako obszar https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/400185196

Poprawiłem tą zmianę: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183481623
arjunaraoc (2026-06-02 00:16:01+00:00): Hello Harsha514000,  Another misleading comment for your edit. You added a road with comment, "Natural features were added". Please refrain from such behaviour.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183478227
arjunaraoc (2026-06-02 00:19:09+00:00): Bing image does not show roads at the places you added. While NH167A upgrade to four lane is  in progress, you can not add with out GPS or actual drawing basis.  Please do not do such edits.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183478227
JeroenvanderGun (2026-06-25 15:12:35+00:00): I reverted this changeset and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183478581 because neither Morocco nor Spain has exclusive control of Perejil Island, so the original mapping as part of both claimant countries was a fair reflection of on-the-ground control.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184589347
SomeoneElse (2026-07-10 14:59:16+00:00): HEllo,
This changeset appears to add fake features in the middle of a desert.  Can you explain what you were trying to do?
manjita pandey (2026-07-28 07:48:16+00:00): This changeset was the part of test datasets unaware that the changesets will be populated on osm production server. You can view the hashtags and host to confirm my statement.
We, however, will make sure not to add any test data to osm on days to come.
ajmat (2026-06-03 07:55:52+00:00): Reverted in changeset id: 183579014
Fizzie-DWG (2026-06-10 04:05:09+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183902177
rajdhani (2026-06-02 12:04:26+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:183543479
PostaMap_Infinite (2026-06-01 08:12:01+00:00): Will continue to update further
Bienson (2026-06-01 18:00:43+00:00): Also erstens ist dies der dedizierte Adressen-POI für Hausnummer 24a, der nicht für anderweitige POIs verwendet werden sollte, und zweitens gibt es kein amenity=Café.

Bitte korrigieren.
Herman Lee (2026-06-01 10:00:35+00:00): 在中国大陆地区标注蜜雪冰城的时候请使用中文（简体），而非英文。如果本地没有名称，也请不要臆造名称。
Puffi_fp (2026-06-02 06:11:18+00:00): Ok, which characters of the name are exactly "Mi Xue"?
Or should i use the characters a translator app gives me when i enter "Mi Xue Ice cream and Tea"?
Herman Lee (2026-06-02 06:19:53+00:00): 首先，蜜（Mi）雪（Xue）冰（Bing）城（Cheng）在ID编辑器中nsi有收录，只需点击就可以了，就如同世界其他的连锁品牌如星巴克，壳牌等一样。如果您对本地语言不甚了解，请使用您所使用的语言用于标签表示，比如name:en，并将name留空，其他编辑者会补足正确的本地名称。
Leo Slager (2026-06-01 19:07:43+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Fizzie-DWG (2026-07-12 03:40:07+00:00): DWG revert - apparent sock-puppet import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185570626
MappingMore (2026-06-03 06:00:59+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset ID:183574266
Wildsharky (2026-06-02 11:49:36+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:183537006
Frans S (2026-06-01 10:36:29+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please do not cluster buildings, but map them as individual buildings.

And... you deleted a correctly mapped multi story building and remapped it, including the roof and sidewalls, as 1 building. The building was correctly mapped by a well-experienced expert mapper.
Check this webpage
Original mapping deleted and newly mapped by you.

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=183481559

Situation after modifying again by me

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=183483194
I also split clustered buildings.

FYI
High-rise buildings are regularly  incorrectly mapped.
You can see both one or more side walls and the roof. The Imagery is taken under a certain angle, so you can see more .
Often all visible walls and roofs are mapped as 1 building.
The correct way is to map the roofline and move the whole object on their footprint.

Check this video.
For buildings with a few floors, start watching from position 1 minute. 
https://youtu.be/Tpi-BTMVo1M
https://youtu.be/dsfUcslLtVc?si=bEHwRl1sxDI_GA0H


Best regards
Wildsharky (2026-06-02 11:50:54+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:183538608
aw_LT (2026-06-01 09:35:48+00:00): Hallo, woher kommt die Information? Im Zams ist bei der Orstafel eine 30er-Beschränkung montiert, somit gilt das im ganzen Ortsgebiet. Davon ausgenommen ist nur die B171.
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=47.15141292000001&lng=10.581342680000034&z=18.241340829549713&pKey=2072524319969855&focus=photo&x=0.7575989331265931&y=0.5123407810805348&zoom=1.2050703497870356
ayxis (2026-06-01 10:49:35+00:00): Das Schild am Ortseingang habe ich nicht gesehen! Danke!
Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183491611
ayxis (2026-06-01 11:01:53+00:00): Habe die Maxspeed-Quelle angepasst:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183492133

Siehe
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:source:maxspeed=AT:city%20limit30?uselang=de
aw_LT (2026-06-01 11:03:48+00:00): Danke für den schnellen Revert und die Quellen-Ergänzung
Syl (2026-06-01 08:04:06+00:00): Hello, the parking already exists: : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/685756004
The parking entrance here is a different thing and should not be removed.
And also, as I told to ApekshaData, the website link should be in French not in English.

Your changes looks like organised editing and should respect the guidelines : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing/Guidelines
ajmat (2026-06-03 04:47:52+00:00): Reverted in changeset id: 183571866
Leo Slager (2026-06-01 18:54:14+00:00): review:
Hier is iets grondig fout gegaan:
Je editor geeft maar liefst 18 warnings, dat zijn fouten die je zou moeten oplossen voor je de changset upload naar de server.

Bij het verslepen van de kaart heb je per ongeluk een geselecteerde node over grote afstand versleept met alle fouten tot gevolg.
Hier kun je dat zien:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=183482408

Als je de kaart wilt verslepen is het beter om uit de edit-modus te gaan.
Dan de kaart versleoen en een nieuwe changeset maken.

ik pas het even aan.

Veel plezier met verder mappen.
Leo
Leo Slager (2026-06-01 18:58:34+00:00): PS:
In de linker bovenhoek is de footway drie dubbel ingetekend.
NorthCrab_upload (2026-06-01 10:34:10+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13900744935

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
dmjab13 (2026-06-01 19:30:32+00:00): please try to submit changesets like this in smaller regions, such as by state or city
Wanderer2000 (2026-06-01 10:16:07+00:00): Hoi Taurus, is de verandering van het fietspad al afgerond? Uit je bron haal ik alleen dat er een plan is goedgekeurd. In OSM tekenen we iets pas in als er daadwerkelijk iets veranderd is 'on the ground'.  
Groetjes Wanderer
Taurus3 (2026-06-02 07:10:40+00:00): Ja, inmiddels zijn de fietspaden gerealiseerd en zijn de werkzaamheden in de afrondende fase. Vandaar dat ik ze heb getekend.
Taurus
NorthCrab_upload (2026-06-01 10:33:59+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3610405800
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/415517333

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
HellMap (2026-06-02 10:12:08+00:00): Jau iepriekš minēts, ka joslas atsevišķi nezīmē, ja tās nav fiziski nodalītas.
Bienson (2026-06-01 17:55:12+00:00): Laut ALKIS Hausnummer 16, nicht 20. Was ist korrekt?
herr_taschenbier (2026-06-03 08:18:55+00:00): Am Gebäude steht 20. Steht leer und wird (bald) abgerissen.
Bartek444 (2026-06-01 10:12:33+00:00): W Małoszowie wprowadiłeś stary przebieg słupów. Był przebudowany w tym roku. Nowy przebieg był już wprowadzony w OSM
Bartek444 (2026-06-01 10:14:14+00:00): zmiana przebiegu dotyczy trafo i słupów w okolicy Małoszów2 i Małoszów 3
TranslatorPS (2026-06-01 10:21:23+00:00): Ok, poprawię później z powrotem. Jak widzę rozjazd pomiędzy zdjęciami orto a warstwą elektroenergetyczną z Geoportalu to mam zwyczaj ufać bardziej zdjęciom ;)
TranslatorPS (2026-06-01 13:13:56+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183498658 → i cyk.
flohoff (2026-06-01 12:48:25+00:00): Hi,
you have changes road classifications here without any documentation why.

In Germany we typically have the pretty strict following of governmental classes like "Kreisstraße" beeing "tertiary"

This is not the case here. So what is the reasoning behind the reclassification?

Flo
flohoff (2026-06-01 12:48:56+00:00): This changeset was flagged for me as it significantly changed routing around:

https://osm.zz.de/routeqa/?rid=1242812,1279618#52.21795,7.02619,15z
i5IoXTZhmQ61ragH (2026-06-01 15:56:04+00:00): Good afternoon!

The motivation behind this change set is to highlight the roads within the residential area, otherwise, the navigator. For example, the part of Alter Postweg where the priority is increased on intersections is marked as the main road by priority rules, and physically it is more suitable for driving.

In case the German community agreed strictly on following governmental classes Kreisstraße, then the classes should be returned. However, I did not observe a strict rule in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dtertiary.

Changing routing around... difficult to say something here. It depends on the navigation system implementation.

In case the change is still controversial, I am open to discussion.
Martinligabue (2026-06-01 09:54:45+00:00): ci son stato ieri notte ed è perfettamente accessibile e aperta, nessun cartello, nessuna barriera
Fraxi (2026-06-01 10:09:56+00:00): Здравей!
Благодаря за добавянето на кметството!
Тъй като пише, че то се намира на ул. 1-ва, логически(а и на база отворените данни от кадастъра), считам, че https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27123124 е въпросната ул. 1-ва. Поне донякъде, според кадастъра. Ако искаш, ѝ сложи името, ако знаеш откъде докъде се простира.
Също така, не е нужно да има допълнителни интервали в името на улицата между името и тирето. Това мога и аз да го оправя.
Fraxi (2026-06-01 10:26:45+00:00): Оправих имената: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183490410
infeeeee (2026-06-01 10:04:59+00:00): Szia! Üdv az OpenStreetMapen!

A kút már amúgy is eltávolítottként volt jelölve. Az ilyeneket azért szoktuk fennhagyni, hogy régebbi utcakép, műholdkép alapján nehogy valaki visszarajzolja.

Tekintve, hogy ez már évek óta eltávolítva lehetett, ez annyira nem baj, nem kell visszarakni.

Ha kérdésed merülne fel, a magyar szerkesztő közösség elérhetőségeit megtalálod ezen az oldalon: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hungary/Közösség#Elérhetőségek

További jó térképezést!
komlosn (2026-06-01 10:14:11+00:00): Szia!
Köszönöm, még új vagyok. 
Sajnos valami miatt töb éve 
 db ivókutat jelez a rendszer pedig sosem volt ott  2.  (Mi üzemeltetjük őket)

Lehet hogy bénázok de az I. kerület térségében szeretném majd bejelölni a nyilvános WC-ket. Erre nem találtam ikont, melyik menüben kell keressem? 
Köszi a segítséget.
infeeeee (2026-06-01 10:38:43+00:00): Szia, az általános wc-k címkéje amenity=toilets

ID szerkesztőben (amit használsz) a neve 'Mosdó, vécé'

Viszont üzemeltetőtől jövő adatokat nem biztos, hogy felvihetsz jogilag, az adatgazdától kell engedély, ha nem csak saját ismereted alapján dolgozol, hanem a munkáltatód egy listáját akarod feltölteni.

Bövebben itt: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Grin/Potenciálisan_használható_források

Ha kapsz engedélyt azt ide kell feltölteni: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hungary/Importálás/Engedélyek
Glassman (2026-06-03 00:37:37+00:00): This looks like someone's home. Are you sure they want people showing up and ringing their door bell?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183486529
bxl-forever (2026-06-01 10:56:24+00:00): Hello, utopiah,

Adding Ludeo is a good idea but please do NOT map it by adding a name to an existing building.  The name field for a building is, of course, when a building really has a name, this is not meant to tag the name of a business or administration currently using it.

The recommended method to add a place to OSM is to create a floating point inside the building.  Also, just adding a name is pointless, if you do not add a suitable category, people will be unable to find it properly.

We redid your edit here.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13901212356
Frans S (2026-06-01 11:36:28+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
A remark about your mapping
Take a look at this webpage
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1525085872/history
You've drawn half of a roof here. The roof appears to consist of two parts: a gray section and a white section. The difference in color may be caused by the angle of the light.

In another situation you forgot to map a big building, but mapped just a few white objects (Loading docks ??)
I mapped it.

You also overlooked buildings
Load the Mapbox imagery for a better contrast. (correct the offset to the bing position)

Best regards and keep mapping
Fizzie-DWG (2026-06-10 04:05:10+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183902177
bxl-forever (2026-06-04 01:54:41+00:00): Hello, and welcome to OSM.
Thanks for spotting a missing house here
We unfortunately had to redo your edit here. (It looks like you traced on aerial photos instead of using the official government footprint.) The page on our wiki explains how it works.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Belgium/Conventions/Buildings
Gregory Peony (2026-06-16 20:51:21+00:00): I cannot see a bridge where you added one here. If you did this in response to a highway waterway overlap warning then in future please consider warnings as indicators of possible problems. --- In this case if you do not know the type of crossing you may leave the warning provided the highway and waterway data is otherwise valid and someone who is in a position to properly resolve the issue may do so. Some warnings may be false positives.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183487571
MrLocalFixer (2026-06-17 06:41:49+00:00): got it thanks.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183487571
Tomas_J (2026-07-24 22:47:19+00:00): Hi, you have mapped this separated sidewalk (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1525093986), but you forgot to correct the sidewalk:right=yes tag on the adjesent road. I will correct, take care fot it the next time pls. Thanks. T.
ScarlettB (2026-07-25 15:10:22+00:00): Hiya, thanks for spotting it! Tagged pavement is one of the things I do keep forgetting about. I'll do my best to remember in the future!
mapnerd🤓 (2026-07-06 13:01:36+00:00): heya, arent these called refuge islands? 
Instead of footway sidewalk shouldn't it be footway traffic_island?
or have i been mapping it wrong this whole time
catgirlseraid (2026-07-09 00:23:30+00:00): they are refuge islands yeah, sorry i mustn't have been paying attention when mapping them, thanks for pointing it out!
pitscheplatsch (2026-06-01 09:58:37+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
Is this name real?
nocap 2011 du vcp (1110739987), v3
dafadllyn (2026-06-02 16:04:21+00:00): Hallo mueschel

Weshalb änderst du bei meinen Edits payment:swisspass zu payment:swiss_pass?

Die Karte heisst Swisspass (bzw. offiziell SwissPass, siehe https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swisspass), weshalb payment:swisspass=* logisch wäre (analog zu authentication:swisspass=*).

Ich konnte weder im Wiki, noch im Forum oder auf der Mailingliste einen Hinweis finden, dass payment:swiss_pass zu bevorzugen sei. Ohne Diskussion finde ich solche (halb)automatischen Änderungen nicht gut.

Gruss, Raphael
mueschel (2026-06-02 16:17:39+00:00): Hallo,
"swiss_pass" ist die Schreibweise die seit ein paar Jahren verwendet wird. Das kann man gerne ändern, aber dann sollte es gleichzeit überall gemacht werden. Bis dahin ist es besser zumindest eine einheitliche Schreibweise zu haben.

https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/payment:swiss_pass
dafadllyn (2026-06-02 18:36:29+00:00): Danke für deine Antwort. Ich habe das Thema mal im Forum angesprochen: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/payment-swiss-pass-vs-payment-swisspass/144284
m_fuhrmann (2026-06-01 10:01:26+00:00): Danke für diesen Change! Ich glaube wir haben im Kreis Fulda keine Kanuten, die OSM pflegen. Aber deren Vereinsgelände ist super gemappt :joy:
mos_next_door (2026-06-02 07:19:05+00:00): Hi Gorger, could you please explain the reasoning behind your edit?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183489210
Gorger (2026-06-03 12:16:20+00:00): Hi mos_next_door, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you
Gorger (2026-06-04 16:24:29+00:00): Hi mos_next_door,
I reviewed the GPS traces from the past two months and observed that vehicles were traveling along this way. However, I didn’t catch that there was no traffic since May 22. 
I will be more diligent with my future edits to avoid similar oversights. In the meantime, you can see the changeset reverted to restore the previous state.
Kindly thank you for bringing this to my attention.
mos_next_door (2026-06-04 20:53:05+00:00): Thanks for checking and restoring, appreciate it.
Syl (2026-06-01 22:44:57+00:00): Hello, this parking already exist: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2204684110
Here it's a parking entrance which is a different object.
Fizzie-DWG (2026-07-12 03:40:08+00:00): DWG revert - apparent sock-puppet import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185570626
ab1969 (2026-06-02 14:04:02+00:00): Position Getränkeland ist an der Stelle vom Autohaus Lindenberg Filiale Templin, Autohaus gibts wohl nicht mehr.
einufo (2026-06-02 14:17:11+00:00): Danke, korrigiere ich.
Fizzie-DWG (2026-07-12 03:40:09+00:00): DWG revert - apparent sock-puppet import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185570626
habi (2026-06-02 12:47:08+00:00): Ciao Orsacchiotto
Da sind grad zwei Duplikate in die OpenStreetMap-Daten gelangt.
Ich habe das in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183545105 korrigiert.
Gruss,
Habi
leojth (2026-07-27 06:37:28+00:00): Hi! This changeset is wrong and should be fully reverted. The road has been rebuilt recently and Esri imagery is not updated. See changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181838069
Tinetto (2026-07-27 10:49:38+00:00): Hi leojth, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you.
Tinetto (2026-07-28 09:37:45+00:00): Changeset reverted. Thank you for the nudge here leojth. I’ll be more aware on identifying outdated imagery and cross-checking with other sources in my future edits.
JeroenHoek (2026-06-02 17:17:53+00:00): Aangevuld:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183556886
Fizzie-DWG (2026-07-12 03:40:10+00:00): DWG revert - apparent sock-puppet import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185570626
Kri_ttt (2026-06-01 11:06:31+00:00): reverted back in changeset/183492303
MarkoŠatrak (2026-06-05 12:54:44+00:00): Merged back in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183694527  because administrative boundary ways were tagged with maxweight instead of roads #OptimoRoute
4004 (2026-06-14 00:37:59+00:00): это что то из ролевой темы?
lexmercenery (2026-06-15 10:41:16+00:00): Изначально да. Но современем, стало именем собственным. Ролевиков там давно нет, а кемпинг остался. Стол, каменный очаг и лавочки.
Leo Slager (2026-06-01 19:11:01+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Edelsalami (2026-06-18 06:47:37+00:00): Hallo skycastle66, du hast hier fälschlicherweise ein Wald-Polygon als Zaun gemappt. Ich nehme an, das war ein Versehen? Ich mache deine Änderung rückgängig. 
Gruß
pitscheplatsch (2026-06-01 11:37:22+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
Is this name real?
Колодец закрыт, воды набрать нельзя. По словам местных, всё равно, вода не питьевая (9794897217), v2
NorthCrab_upload (2026-06-01 14:54:17+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13295087157

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-06-01 13:47:02+00:00): ta edycja zmieniała nie drogę a kable z prądem
GminaDubiecko (2026-06-01 16:49:09+00:00): a to akurat pewnie omyłkowo
Fizzie-DWG (2026-07-12 03:40:11+00:00): DWG revert - apparent sock-puppet import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185570626
Wildsharky (2026-06-02 11:48:35+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:183535970
ItsHoritsu (2026-06-01 11:51:08+00:00): Ich hab wohl den Tag highway falsch verstanden. Ist aber trotzdem ein maze/Labyrinth.
Gaung Tebono (2026-06-01 13:54:49+00:00): Untuk yang sukanya revert suntingan saya, tolong baca bagian Indonesia di subjudul "International equivalence":

"Usually this road is used as the main route connecting the surrounding areas. Even though it is primary, it does not necessarily mean that its authority falls under the provincial government because many roads under the authority of regencies or cities also have the same function as this provincial road."

Baca lalu terjemahkan supaya ngerti dan tidak war suntingan lagi 🙏🏻
FajrAl (2026-06-02 10:39:10+00:00): Diskusikan saja dengan orang yang mengubah sebelumnya di https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183485599
NaufalFarras (2026-06-04 16:28:26+00:00): Mohon maaf, jika yang Anda maksud halaman di https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/International_highway_classification_equivalence, tabel tersebut sebagian belum diperbarui. Silakan baca Pedoman Penandaan Indonesia di https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Id:Indonesian_Tagging_Guidelines. Terima kasih atas pengertiannya.