piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
pavvv (2025-08-13 20:26:52+00:00): Google Maps to nie jest prawidłowe ani wiarygodne źródło. Według e-mapy droga nie ma statusu drogi krajowej. Czy jesteś pewien, że na drodze są tabliczki z numerem 44?

Ale to nie ma znaczenia jeśli chodzi o kategorię drogi, bo kategoria jest zależna od ważności i funkcji drogi w większej skali, a ta droga nie przenosi tranzytu pomiędzy dużymi miastami i nie będzie dopóki nie zostanie otwarta cała obwodnica.
bqnk (2025-08-13 22:01:28+00:00): Zdjęcie z nowego węzła oświęcim na drodze ekspresowej S1 (droga ewidentnie oznaczona czerwonym numerem 44): https://s1-myslowice-bielsko.pl/img/foto/odc2/2025-07/t4/t4-km%2013+300%20WD-18%20we%CC%A8ze%C5%82%20Os%CC%81wie%CC%A8cim.jpg

Na stronie obwodnicy jest napisane "w ciągu DK44" oraz na każdej mapce droga jest oznaczona jako droga krajowa 44

Mógłbym ci jeszcze zrobić i podesłać zdjęcie tabliczek, ale jest środek nocy.

Na openstreetmaps każda droga krajowa jest oznaczana w taki sposób w jaki ją oznaczyłem, sposób w jaki była oznaczona wcześniej sugerowało, że droga jest drogą wojewódzką - bo własnie tak są oznaczane. Mimo że droga nie jest skończona to nie zmienia faktu że jest ona częścią drogi krajowej 44 i właśnie tak powinna być oznaczona.
pavvv (2025-08-13 22:27:13+00:00): Kwestia numeracji mało mnie interesuje i już nie będę o niej dyskutować, ale proszę pamiętać, że klasyfikacja urzędowa i kategoria drogi na OSM to nie to samo. Tym bardziej proszę nie przywracać z uporem maniaka zmianę, którą już Ci wycofano.

Przykład drogi krajowej secondary: DK37, przykład drogi wojewódzkiej primary: DTŚ, DW835
Yunkers (2025-08-17 13:13:13+00:00): Wycofałem zmianę. Ta droga jeszcze nie pełni funkcji krajowej, przy rondzie z Zatorską są bardzo jasno widoczne znaki z objazdem
Filip009 (2025-08-16 09:54:15+00:00): Hello, do you know, that this can be easily done by using JOSM editor with gridify plugin?
t_ja (2025-08-17 09:51:57+00:00): Kludne to moze byt nakreslene aj rucne, ale nech kazde parkovacie miesto je pravouhle a rovnako velke. Ci su na to nastroje v iD editore, to netusim, ale suhlasim, ze v Josm editore na to podpora je 👍

Dalsi problem je, ze presunul poulicne lampy po obvode parkoviska do rohov parkovacich miest, hoci su realne umiestnene v travnatej ploche, vid. https://www.google.sk/maps/@49.2289586,18.7403879,3a,50.1y,138.25h,83.84t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sAwCk3D771Tbv0xzaU74Mhg!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fcb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26pitch%3D6.155701408871224%26panoid%3DAwCk3D771Tbv0xzaU74Mhg%26yaw%3D138.2538927720512!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI1MDgxMy4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D

Snad si to po sebe opravi a ak nie, tak bude jednoduchsie to cele revertnut ako pracne opravovat...
Ajper (2025-08-17 18:00:22+00:00): Opravil som
t_ja (2025-08-19 06:02:12+00:00): Vdaka za opravu 👏
willkmis (2025-08-13 22:11:37+00:00): Hello, are you sure there are traffic signals at this crossing? It doesn't look like there are from the Bing street-level imagery or aerials.
VLD192 (2025-08-14 12:21:48+00:00): Hello. You are correct. I do not see any traffic signals either. Thank you for pointing this out and I will go ahead and update the tags. Thanks again. Casey (VLD192)
willkmis (2025-08-14 13:44:28+00:00): Great, thanks for addressing this so quickly!
Frans S (2025-08-18 13:48:11+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please be more accurate in mappings. You regularly map just a rectangular (sometimes included the shadow as well) Buildings are often more complex.
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2025-08-18 14:00:13+00:00): Check this page for the corrections I made.

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=170618627

Best regards
Frans S (2025-08-18 13:23:23+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
You often include the shadow next to a building in your mapping. 
These are no part of a building.
Keep that in mind at next mappings.
Best regards and keep mapping
Myazyk (2025-08-18 21:44:33+00:00): То є краса! Молодчина!
Shyshka (2025-08-19 16:27:23+00:00): Дякую!
b-holdet (2025-08-14 09:47:03+00:00): Why are you creating fictive object?
They do not exist on ground.
Hb- (2026-02-14 13:00:21+00:00): Straßenname= Kiebitzweg
PLZ= 38446
pitscheplatsch (2025-08-14 07:15:41+00:00): #NameCheck

Hello and welcome to OSM.

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits, particularly those concerning the names you've added or modified.

Some of these names caught my attention as they are quite unique or a bit unusual. Could you please confirm if these additions were intentional or if they might have been added mistakenly?

Looking forward to your response.

Thank you!
BCNorwich (2025-08-15 06:24:32+00:00): Hi, The names seem more like descriptions of the features. The use of the level tag is incorrect. Some features are untagged. The outline Way: edision block (354741132) has very unusual tags. Thus I would suggest this changeset be reverted. You can then learn a bit more about editing OSM and especially editing with the complex JOSM editor.

My attention was initially drawn to the steps area in the SE corner. Where highways are duplicated one atop another. They have the tag level_name=0, what does this mean?

There are many guides and videos to help with JOSM. Need any help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.
user_22712836 (2025-08-14 14:48:46+00:00): przeciez to jest eSka, powinna byc autostradą nie magistralą (chodzi mi o "bzdury" które wycofałeś)
pavvv (2025-08-14 19:19:22+00:00): Formalnie to nie eSka. I bzdurą jest jeszcze name=(S52)

Poza tym identyczna zmiana kategorii została już wycofana.

Weź naucz się używać forum zamiast wandalizować mapę.
Dawid2849 (2025-08-29 15:30:30+00:00): Ta droga nie spełnia współczesnych wymagań dla drogi ekspresowej i będzie rozbudowywana w celu spełnienia tych wymagań. Obecnie jest to droga krajowa klasy GP
L'imaginaire (2025-09-08 10:24:24+00:00): Dag Thibault,
We hadden het pad onder de sporen bijv. ingetekend omdat het fietsnetwerk daarlangs zal lopen. Aan de oostkant van de sporen deden we een toevoeging om gelijkaardige redenen. Ook voor jou dat we die opnieuw toevoegen en ze kunnen blijven staan?

Of had je nog een andere reden om ze als overbodig te beschouwen?
Thibault Rommel (2025-09-08 10:45:41+00:00): Hey
Ik ben in verlof, ik bekijk het volgende week.
Thibault Rommel (2025-09-18 19:04:33+00:00): Way 1364493700 heb ik verwijderd doordat deze op de bushaven aansluit op een plaats waar de borduur niet is verlaagd. Kan de parallele way 724877013 gebruikt worden in de plaats?
Way 1364493699 heb ik verwijderd omdat deze dezelfde trottoirverlaging gebruikt als way 1018479016 en daardoor overbodig leek. Mijn bedoeling was om het aantal wegsegementen die door de voetgangerzone lopen te beperken tot het noodzakelijke. Ik zag niet dat je deze toevoegde ifv de uitbouw van een netwerk, anders had ik je wel eerst gecontacteerd :)
L'imaginaire (2025-09-22 10:31:40+00:00): Merci voor de feedback! Nog even besproken met de collega waarmee ik het oorspronkelijke traject intekende. Hij had blijkbaar ook eerder contact met jouw collega Sam. Ik heb de twee paden opnieuw ingetekend, maar nu zo veel mogelijk rekening gehouden met waar de drempels in het trottoir zijn verlaagd. Beide paden zijn dus vooral bedoeld met het oog op een vlotte routering voor fietsers en voor mapping van het fietsnetwerk op OSM. Laat zeker nog iets weten mocht je nog aandachtspunten of mogelijke verbeteringen zien.
custodiankeyy (2025-08-13 20:25:54+00:00): Merhaba, lütfen önceki değişiklik setlerinize yapmış olduğum yorumlara cevap verin. Teşekkürler.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170257645

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170257371
lankapuhelin (2026-04-17 19:01:18+00:00): Hei, Särkkäniemen suojelualueella on pyöräilykielto. Olet poistanut tällä muutoskokoelmalla muutaman bicycle=no tagin
Rawmance (2026-04-17 19:04:56+00:00): Se on päällystettyä hiekkatietä.
lankapuhelin (2026-04-17 19:35:48+00:00): Tarkoitan noita pienempiä polkuja idässä
Frans S (2025-08-18 12:54:39+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
I am afraid that you have a bad start.
Sorry to say, but your mappings are not as what we might expect.
Issues : building nodes connected to each other. 
Buildings not squared.
Many buildings are duplicated (mapped a month before by another mapper)
I think that you did not zoom in far enough to see already mapped buildings. Check the bottom line in IDeditor for hidden mappings.
I invalidate this task.
Best regards
Taya_S (2025-09-21 12:27:04+00:00): Reverted data copied from unauthorised sources

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172243021
pitscheplatsch (2025-08-14 07:15:14+00:00): This is #spam and should be reverted.
TrickyFoxy (2025-08-23 11:23:08+00:00): Reverted

@Orlovklg нужны подробности о месте, которое вы хотели добавить. Страница в соцсетях или сайт были очень полезны
Gregory Peony (2025-08-18 16:27:37+00:00): Hi Annabel, well done, it's clear to me that you are begining to grasp the concept of correcting a footpritn's position when mapping using imagery captured at an angle. There are a few inaccuracies in this changeset I have mapped these footprints as an example in https://osmcha.org/changesets/170626506. --- Before mapping take a moment to (litterally) note two fundamental properties of any imagery you're looking at;

1. The direction from which the scene is lit or shadows are cast.

2. The angle at which the imagery was taken i.e. which sides of buildings you can see. 

It appears to me that you did not account for the off-nadir imagery when buildings were close together and obscuring one another's walls. In cases like this either another imagery source which was captured from a different angle should be used, or adjecent groups of buildings where the base of at least one of them is visible should be selected (shift+LClick) before accounting for off-nadir and moved (m) in usison to position them more accurately (this works best if the height of the builings is similar). In OSMCha click the map icon and select ESRI which is closer to a vertical photo and see how some footprints are positioned well with respect to it while others are inaccurate. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
pitscheplatsch (2025-08-14 07:13:59+00:00): #NameCheck

Hello and welcome to OSM.

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits, particularly those concerning the names you've added or modified.

Some of these names caught my attention as they are quite unique or a bit unusual. Could you please confirm if these additions were intentional or if they might have been added mistakenly?

Looking forward to your response.

Thank you!
NorthCrab_upload (2025-08-13 21:42:13+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5187821072
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/963335973

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2025-08-13 22:02:32+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5187821072
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/963335973

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2025-08-13 22:42:19+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5187821072
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/963335973

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Barroszt (2025-08-22 11:13:45+00:00): naprawione
pitscheplatsch (2025-08-14 07:18:10+00:00): #NameCheck

Hello and welcome to OSM.

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits, particularly those concerning the names you've added or modified.

Some of these names caught my attention as they are quite unique or a bit unusual. Could you please confirm if these additions were intentional or if they might have been added mistakenly?

Looking forward to your response.

Thank you!
Marisa Spark (2025-08-14 12:55:43+00:00): Thank you!
What would you like to know? If it's the numbers, it's the house numbers, sometimes they seem like disconnected numbers.
custodiankeyy (2025-08-15 19:34:54+00:00): Tekrar tüm binayı kuaför olarak işaretlemişsiniz. Lütfen bunu yapmayın.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170496391
Taya_S (2025-09-21 12:23:41+00:00): Reverted data copied from unauthorised sources

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172242901
Frans S (2025-08-18 12:24:19+00:00): Thanks for mapping.
I am sorry to say, but these mappings need to be improved.
Clustered buildings need to be split into individual buildings.
Buildings which does not meet their footprint need to be adjusted.
Best regards and keep mapping
Jrachi (2025-08-19 08:13:15+00:00): Scusa, non sono sicuro di cosa scrivi in inglese...
Ma cancellare un sentiero che è parte di una relazione a catasto è una mossa che non si fa!
Avvisa l'user che ha creato il sentiero, e l'user che ha creato la relazione, prima di cancellare il lavoro di qualcuno.

Procedo al revert completo dei dati che hai introdotto o modificato.

Ivo
hchchc (2025-08-19 16:05:27+00:00): Quel percorso non esiste.

Il percorso con cui l'ho sostituito lo fa. L'ho rintracciato con il GPS.

La mappa è sbagliata.

Ci sono stato e ho visto me stesso.

Non cambierò più la mappa.

Puoi decidere se vuoi una mappa corretta o meno.
Jrachi (2025-08-19 16:30:20+00:00): Il problema è che non hai sostituito" un sentiero, lo hai cancellato il sentiero senza preoccuparti di spezzare la relazione.
Una cosa è un sentiero nel bosco ed un'altra è credere che un gps sia la verità assoluta.
Durante la registrazione hai tenuto d'occhio la precisione e la posizione dei satelliti.
Hai attivato il GNSS?

Dipende, naturalmente, da quale dispositivo avevi a disposizione...

Ivo
custodiankeyy (2025-08-13 21:09:03+00:00): Lütfen değişiklik seti özetine "büyük değişiklikler" tarzı yerine daha açıklayıcı metinler kullanın.
eggie (2025-08-14 06:36:09+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-08-14 06:39:26+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback   Zou de naam kloppen? 
	B&B 'Op Emmdijk'

De tags voor B&B zijn 
tourism=guest_house
guest_house=bed_and_breakfast



MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-08-14 06:45:32+00:00): Naam en locatie conform website aangepast
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-05 17:19:49+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13069793990/history has app_operated = yes that was added in this edit
What app_operated=yes means here? Have you wanted to mark that you can control it with app in some way but app may be necessary or not? For example shop where you can scan and pay with app, without going through a traditional line. Or is it for objects where you need an app to use them at all? Then maybe app_operated=only would be better?

Note, this key seems undocumented on wiki, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Key:app_operated and
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-05 17:22:50+00:00): welp, this page actually exists now, I forgot to check it and I forgot that I tried to document it (feel free to check its correctness!)

sorry for last sentence being wrong
Rainero (2025-12-05 21:28:34+00:00): Hallo Mateusz,

app_operated=* ist auf jeden Fall dokumentiert auf https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity=parcel%20locker?uselang=de  
Daher habe ich das Attribut verwendet.

translated with DeepL:  
app_operated=* is definitely documented at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity=parcel%20locker?uselang=de  
That is why I used the tag.
eggie (2025-08-14 06:40:55+00:00): De info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-02 18:20:40+00:00): Hi Tommy Tokoto,

bitte schau einmal bei dem Folgenden Changeset vorbei: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179268128

Dort wurden Änderungen durchgeführt, die auch dieses Changeset hier betreffen.

Danke und viele Grüße,
Pascal
Tommy Tokoto (2026-03-03 09:59:04+00:00): Hallo Pascal,

danke für den Hinweis, ich sehe es mir an.

Viele Grüße,

Thomas
buy_osmand (2025-08-19 04:38:27+00:00): 😳👍Good,
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170409650
archie (2025-08-13 21:32:56+00:00): Hej, jag noterar att du hittat adress med Gamla Nissanstigen även efter Brandshult. Men du håller väl med om att vägen efter Gamla Nissanstigen 180 heter Brandshultsvägen? Det var ju även den del av vägen och längre nordostlig som du åsatte namnet Gamla Nissanstigen. Detta var ju näppeligen korrekt. 
Förresten Brandshultsvägen finns med på NVDB och lantmäteriet. 
Så eftersom postadresser finns upp till Gamla Nissanstigen 180, så bör ju rimligen även vägnamnet vara det upp till där Brandshultsvägen börjar.
teppic (2025-08-13 22:40:09+00:00): > Det var ju även den del av vägen och längre nordostlig som du åsatte namnet Gamla Nissanstigen. Detta var ju näppeligen korrekt.

Ja, det var en förhastad ändring, som jag nämnde i en annan kommentar. Du gjorde helt rätt i att rulla tillbaka den ändringen.

> Men du håller väl med om att vägen efter Gamla Nissanstigen 180 heter Brandshultsvägen?

Ja, det stämmer med min uppfattning.

> Förresten Brandshultsvägen finns med på NVDB och lantmäteriet. 

Ja, dessa verkar dock inte stämma helt om man skall tro skyltningen.

> Så eftersom postadresser finns upp till Gamla Nissanstigen 180, så bör ju rimligen även vägnamnet vara det upp till där Brandshultsvägen börjar.

Instämmer helt!
StC (2025-08-19 14:50:16+00:00): This changeset has broken the continuity of a hiking route that passes there. It seems like a basic error, the extension of a way beyond its connection to the next way. Apparently your editor does not detect this type of mistakes, and perhaps it would make sense to switch to JOSM or iD before editing ways in a complex setting with relations?
VLD299 (2025-08-19 16:22:29+00:00): Hello StC, 

I apologize for my mistake and will try to be more cautious of route connectivity while editing. Thanks for resolving the continuity issue.

-Conor
Firefishy (2025-08-13 21:49:05+00:00): Nice work! Getting there. Warmer looking great, catching up to my humble work for Newton Park.
GovernorKeagan (2025-08-13 22:03:58+00:00): Thank you! I’ve had to slow down a bit as I was quickly heading towards burnout but I’m really happy with progress so far!
Firefishy (2025-08-13 23:16:04+00:00): I should really show you https://csggis.drdlr.gov.za/psv/
And then querying the underlying data from http://csg.drdlr.gov.za/esio/searchindex.htm (eg: Search on Town, Eastern Cape - Urban - Town/Region Name: WALMER - Parcel: 2905 - Portion: 0, to get a the general plan or plan for plot). This is available for the WHOLE country.
GovernorKeagan (2025-08-14 00:48:48+00:00): Ohhh, that looks very interesting! What would be the best way to get in touch? I should have some more free time in September once I start my new job, but always happy to learn new things whenever I can.
mueschel (2025-08-19 10:00:19+00:00): Hi,
could you check the sockets here?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13069836214

"bosch_smart" is not a common socket type.
VladaC (2025-08-19 10:22:45+00:00): Hi mueschel,
A suitable key for Bosch Smart System needs to be added to the osm wiki. The Smart System is yet another charging interface from Bosch, distinct from the older 3-pin and 5-pin interfaces. I believe it has replaced their older standards since about 2022. I am extremely busy this week and next week, so I cannot take any initiative in the standardization of the new key at the moment.
Regards,
VladaC
mueschel (2025-08-19 10:32:37+00:00): Do you have a link? All I can find is Bosch smart home equipment.
VladaC (2025-08-19 10:54:50+00:00): Sorry for a video link but I could not find anything better than this: https://youtu.be/YQvoLBhFR1I?si=FOwrBj_pR4789Pab
I can supply a photo and a pictogram of the socket for wiki in about two weeks but not now.
jtracey (2025-08-13 21:34:22+00:00): Resolves https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4899767
Baloo Uriza (2025-08-14 13:54:08+00:00): Testify.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170410452
Map_HeRo (2026-03-09 16:24:58+00:00): Hallo Rurido, Du hast mit diesem CS diverse Flurbezeichnungen an Acker- und Wiesenflächen gehängt. Diese Flächenbezeichnungen sollen ganz allgemein nur dann getaggt werden, wenn sie vor Ort allgemein gebräuchlich und damit verifizierbar sind. Das ist hier aber nicht der Fall. Ein flächendeckendes Abschreiben aus einer anderen Quelle entspricht nicht den OSM-Richtlinien und hat den Nachteil, dass man auf der Kartendarstellung nicht mehr erkennen kann, was lediglich eine Katasterbezeichnung und was ein vor Ort gebräuchlicher Name ist.

Darüber hinaus stimmen die von Dir dort eingetragenen Namen nur teilweise mit den Flurbezeichnungen in ALKIS überein.

Wenn Du trotzdem Flurnamen mappen willst, schlage ich dafür die Verwendung von Nodes mit place=locality und cadastral_name=* vor. Dann lassen sich diese Verwaltungsbezeichnungen von den gebräuchlichen Namen unterscheiden.

Gruß Mikke
Senihtu (2025-08-21 10:15:13+00:00): Hi!
mit diesem Changeset hast du die Bürgermeister-Grüning-Straße (way 27455479) zur Einbahnstraße gemacht.
In der Straße gibt es laut OSM-Daten eine Bushaltestelle in die Gegenrichtung (node 1277449954) und mindestens eine Buslinie, die dort hält:
Bus 120: Warburg => Wolfhagen (Relation 8885445) 
Da ich mich in der Gegend überhaupt nicht auskenne hoffe ich, daß Du weißt, ob die Bushaltestelle abgebaut wurde und wo der Bus jetzt lang fährt!
Happy mapping!
Senihtu
meg_map (2025-08-21 10:37:25+00:00): Hi,
und danke für den Hinweis. Die Änderung zur Einbahnstraße war keine Absicht und ein Fehler.
Werde es korrigieren.

Viele Grüße
Benoît C MdP (2025-09-22 14:45:12+00:00): Bonjour VLD. Merci mais encore une fois tu as fais des modifications sur la base d'une imagerie aérienne qui n'est pas à jour. J'ai corrigé ce que j'ai pu.

Bonne continuation

Benoît
VLD277 (2025-09-22 15:47:24+00:00): Bonjour Benoît,

Thank you for reaching out and for making the necessary adjustments. Apologies for using an outdated imagery here - I will be more careful going forward. I appreciate your feedback! 

Susan, VLD277
MLETYH (2025-08-13 22:35:10+00:00): hello
geekbga2024 (2025-08-15 05:19:43+00:00): El Parque La Flora no tiene ése título, por favor cambiarlo como estaba a "Parque Ecológico La Flora"
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170411304
German C (2025-12-03 20:58:32+00:00): Hola Lolj, el nombre es Parque Ecológico La Flora, tal y como se ve en el sistema de parques metropolitanos https://www.amb.gov.co/noticias-4/ y no tiene ese dato adicional de "zona de exploración"
NorthCrab_upload (2025-08-13 23:21:22+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3303421075
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3303421002
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/881095403
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/881095544

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Barroszt (2025-08-14 09:36:53+00:00): naprawione
alza centrala (2026-07-06 16:11:48+00:00): pridaj facebook profil ( krčme soška )
WilliamHarrison (2025-08-14 22:54:19+00:00): 👋
user_5359 (2025-08-14 12:52:21+00:00): Welcome to OSM!  Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/6438769123 more than 100 meters over streets and buildings. 
I moved the node back to the original position.