piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2026-06-07 05:46:14+00:00): Здравствуйте. Замеченные проблемы и некоторые их примеры, которые были найдены в этом и других пакетах правок.  
  
1. Добавлено очень много огородов (садов). Обычно достаточно одного landuse на квартал. Измельчать объекты landuse большого смысла нет. По спутниковым снимкам непонятно, что именно там находится.  
  
2. Неправильное использование названий. Название - это именно название объекта, а не его подпись на карте.  
  
name=Бор  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1500994261  
Это не название леса.  
  
name=полянка  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13745195924  
Непонятный туристический объект в лесу.  
  
name=По кушерям
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1306982812  
Название у тропинки, которое, вероятно, не существует.  
  
name=Исток Верещагинки (примерно)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13438365335  
Это не название источника.  
  
name=Родник лужица (может высохнуть)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13744572089  
Это не название источника.   
  
name=Цех  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/51748834  
Это не название здания.  
  
name=Роддом (старый)  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/51695577  
Это не название объекта.  
  
name=Недострой  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1306982813  
Это не название объекта.  
  
3. Испорчены названия существующих объектов. В названия были добавлены родовые слова, в том числе в виде сокращений.  
  
name=Г. Преображенка  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/760611932  
  
name=С. Прогресс  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/710721433/history
  
4. Субъективные оценки объектов.  
  
name=Омерзительная тропа  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1500755753 
  
------------------------  
  
Пожалуйста, прочитайте статью про названия.  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Названия  
  
Если не знаете, как обозначить какой-либо объект, то попробуйте сначала в каком-либо поисковой системе указать запрос вида "openstreetmap вики ОБЪЕКТ" (без кавычек). Например, openstreetmap вики общежитие  
  
Пожалуйста, прочитайте также статьи:  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Проверяемость  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Хороший_стиль
Jordi MF (2026-06-04 22:30:52+00:00): ¿Hay más formas de poder dar las gracias por haber resuelto este desaguisado? Qué gran trabajo!
dmlls (2026-06-05 06:33:07+00:00): Gracias a ti Jordi por todo! 😄
De mammoet (2026-06-04 19:10:45+00:00): I want to standardize livestock data. I want to separate the animal from the animal product that they are used for. I have documented this way of tagging in the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dlivestock

This systematic way of tagging prevents having multiple names for animals like a chicken.
De mammoet (2026-06-04 19:12:34+00:00): The link in the previous comment is to the wrong wiki article. It should be this one: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:livestock
maro21 (2026-06-04 22:40:16+00:00): Are you aware of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct? Such edits should follow the rules. Was this edit discussed with the community or is it just your point of view on how things should be tagged?

Your comment about wanting to make a change shouldn't be posted in the changeset comment AFTER the change has been made, but on the FORUM BEFORE the change is made.
De mammoet (2026-06-04 23:24:49+00:00): Thank you for pointing it out as I did not know. I assumed the tag review_requested=yes was how it should be done. 

I have now made a forum post for this: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/proposal-use-livestock-to-describe-animals-independently-from-products-and-industrial-activities/144367
samuelzammit (2026-06-05 14:41:14+00:00): Good afternoon, please note that the road was made one-way on 12th May per official notice by the local government 

Sources:
1. https://www.gov.mt/en/Government/DOI/Government%20Gazette/Notices/Pages/2026/05/Notices0505.aspx

2. https://www.facebook.com/mgarrlc/posts/pfbid02LHYXbxs4u9dME1gxFXPgMjfcsi7L7G5zmpkQHJVvjPm3RhByJGUGXo21rnMhHjral
samuelzammit (2026-06-05 14:44:37+00:00): http://openstreetmap.org/changeset/183699800
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-05 15:49:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183702973 where the changeset comment is: revert removal of allegedly under-construction path; what counts is what is there, not what whoever constructs the path would like
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-05 15:49:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183702973 where the changeset comment is: revert removal of allegedly under-construction path; what counts is what is there, not what whoever constructs the path would like
Mashin (2026-06-04 20:32:09+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM!

The problem with your edit is that you applied speed limit to the whole US route 9. We add speed limit to individual  road segments instead.

I went ahead and removed the speed limit.  But feel free to fill in speed limits for roads that you know.
Cheers
rightiecliff (2026-06-04 21:16:40+00:00): Hi Mashin, thanks. Yes, it was not my intention to mark the whole US route 9 as 40 mph. It changes very frequently so I mean to only update a certain part. 

Thanks again.
gscholz (2026-06-13 06:30:40+00:00): Hi Wally_54,
you recent changesets have created errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=13.15708&lat=46.18401&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges

This kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps.
Can you please fix this?

You may also like to educate yourself about how to edit hiking routes properly:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hiking

Kind regards
Guido
MappingMore (2026-06-08 05:18:10+00:00): Partially Revert of 183662382
onterof (2026-06-04 19:47:46+00:00): Das war schnell, danke!
evgenykatyshev (2026-06-05 11:24:52+00:00): A lot of empty nodes were created here as well
MxxCon (2026-06-05 16:44:20+00:00): Good attempt. However, you created loading docks on the sidewalk itself rather than the building😉
I'll fix it up for you.
grzegorz75jan (2026-06-05 06:29:35+00:00): Jeżeli obiekt nie istnieje w terenie https://tarnow.naszemiasto.pl/tarnow-tez-mial-wlasna-skocznie-narciarska-na-gorze-sw/ar/c15-9212923 to nie dodajemy go do OSM i należy go usunąć. 
Takie obiekty dodaje się do OHM https://www.openhistoricalmap.org
dominik4911 (2026-06-05 14:25:44+00:00): Ok. Usunięte, dzięki.
NorthCrab_upload (2026-06-05 02:23:05+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Podana kombinacja addr:city + addr:place jest nieprawidłowa.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/391610139

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Duja (2026-06-05 08:11:08+00:00): Please do not edit administrative boundaries between towns - those are imported from official source. Instead, hide them in iD from the "Map Data" panel.

Also, "add a ford" is never a good solution for ditch-track crossing. In our areas it's practically always a culvert.
WoSoe (2026-06-05 03:52:34+00:00): Moin!

Du erzeugst/arbeitest immer noch mit Geometrie getaggt mit man_made=cutline.

Bitte schau dir die Wiki Seite dazu an und auch die Kommentare zu deinen anderen Changesets!
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183519461

Auch das Thema natural=wood bedarf einer Klärung.

Bitte um Rückmeldung und zeitnahe Anpassung der Daten.

Gruß
WoSoe
streckenkundler (2026-06-08 20:23:11+00:00): https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/offensichtlich-problematische-bearbeitungen-im-thuringer-wald/144453
aighes (2026-06-04 22:01:08+00:00): Hey Carlos,
I reverted your geometry change of I696 and added all current ramp closures. Please keep the geometry, as the road will remain in it's position after the construction is done. Thanks for your understanding.
aighes (2026-06-04 22:46:42+00:00): Just in case you want to redirect the westbound traffic to I696 East lane, please use the eastbound lane and use oneway=-1 and of course add proper connections to the rest of the road network. Though not sure that's worth the effort.
carlosguerrero_lyft (2026-06-05 16:19:37+00:00): Hello, aighes, 
My name is Carlos, and I’m part of the OSM team here at Lyft. Thank you for reaching out regarding these edits, and thank you for the feedback.
Upon review, your layout should work perfectly. My initial changes were based on the MDOT I-696 construction plans, but your approach and the use of construction tags is excellent and completely matches our internal telemetry data.
Given that construction is still actively finishing up on-site, I am more than happy to leave your layout as-is to maintain local consensus. 
We value your local expertise and will keep these details in mind for our future updates.
Happy mapping,
Carlos
WWMapper101 (2026-06-07 13:27:04+00:00): Hi, 
It seems like you deleted the Denig Oval. Was this on purpose? From what I can tell, it still exists
chath_tsu (2026-06-08 01:54:43+00:00): Hi! I removed it because in any of the newer aeriels I saw it was no longer a open sports field and had what looked to be construction/structures/containers. Let me know if you have better sources.
De mammoet (2026-06-04 20:36:58+00:00): I want to standardize livestock data. By replacing industrial=poultry_processing with the combination of industrial=slaughterhouse and livestock=chicken it makes it easier to find what animal species is slaughtered.

See the wiki article https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:livestock and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:industrial%3Dslaughterhouse
De mammoet (2026-06-04 20:41:52+00:00): To not add wrong information I replaced livestock=chicken with livestock=poultry in my new changeset. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183665186
Andrea Alessioli (2026-06-04 20:38:26+00:00): *correct wier direction, tag transition power towers at the end of the overground power line
Forgot to finish typing the description
De mammoet (2026-06-04 20:40:57+00:00): In my previous changeset (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183665043) I replaced the tag industrial=poultry_processing with the combination of the industrial=slaughterhouse and livestock=chicken.

However, because it was not specified which poultry it was (chicken/turkey/gooze/duck/...) I replaced 'chicken' with 'poultry' to not add wrong information.
gscholz (2026-06-10 07:10:44+00:00): Hi geosphere01,
your latest edits have created several errors regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=35.69467&lat=-6.21373&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges

As you may know, this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps.

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
cubbe8 (2026-06-04 23:15:07+00:00): access=bus is not a valid tag
mitchspicer (2026-06-05 13:40:13+00:00): Then why is it an option in the drop down?
Baloo Uriza (2026-06-09 12:59:20+00:00): Is it a camera?  If so, changing what kind of camera it is would be better than deleting it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183666087
dzamper (2026-06-05 20:40:39+00:00): Coś tu nie tak poszło, nie dość że ZUS został przypisany tylko do części budynku, to jeszcze dziedziniec zniknął
kubahahaha (2026-06-06 00:41:01+00:00): Ogarnę po weekendzie, na telefonie nie dam rady - chyba że ktoś mnie ubiegnie
kubahahaha (2026-06-07 16:53:16+00:00): zrobione
yelisey90 (2026-06-05 09:51:42+00:00): some fixes: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183686342
Tomas Straupis (2026-06-05 09:27:18+00:00): Laba diena. Norėčiau atkreipti dėmesį, kad esame sutarę šaligatvių, kurie nėra nuo kelio atskirti žymiu fiziniu barjeru/atstumu, nežymėti atskirais vektoriais. Tai neprideda naudingos informacijos, bet beprasmiškai daro duomenis sudėtingesnius, kas vėliau reiškia daugiau klaidų ir daug daugiau darbo prižiūrint duomenis. Todėl mes karts nuo karto pereiname duomenis ir ištriname tokius šaligtavių vektorius.
Dimitar155 (2026-06-05 14:49:25+00:00): Благодарности за поне 10-те хиляди нови сгради от последните два месеца (според https://osmstats.neis-one.org/?item=countries&country=Bulgaria)!

Само за покривните соларни панели е хубаво да добавяш и location=roof (way/1526240809).

Поздрави,
Митко
map-dynartio (2026-06-05 14:54:13+00:00): Здравей Митко, мерси, намерих си ново хоби :D 
ОК за соларните панели, така ще правя и ще променя тези около Панчарево, които скоро съм добавила. 
Поздрави, Марина
Wildsharky (2026-06-10 05:31:12+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:183688672
stasiu512 (2026-06-04 22:09:38+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
stasiu512 (2026-06-04 22:12:53+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
JeroenHoek (2026-06-05 07:11:34+00:00): Klopt niet helemaal, want de volkstuin is afsluitbaar met een hek. Daar kun je omheen stappen als voetganger, maar niet met andere voertuigen die buiten motor_vehicle vallen.

Ik zou hier niet verder gaan dan fietsen die gedoogd worden, want deze route lijkt meer bedoeld als ommetje voor dorpsbewoners gezien het ontbreken van fietspadborden verderop.

Waarom deze aanpassing?
Michiel Duyvendak (2026-06-08 10:05:44+00:00): Moet het dan op permissive komen te staan?  
Dit stukje pad routeerde niet terwijl het pad daarna wel routeerde.
JeroenHoek (2026-06-08 10:23:48+00:00): Waarin routeerde het niet? Fietsnavigatie werkte daar gewoon in, want bicycle=yes maakte dat mogelijk. Alleen brommers en scooters zal hij weigeren.
JeroenHoek (2026-06-08 10:28:54+00:00): Ik heb het aangepast met permissive nu, maar je gebruikt waarschijnlijk een ander profiel dan fiets of voetganger, want met access=yes routeert het wel natuurlijk.
rempshaener (2026-06-06 12:53:39+00:00): Hallo,

das Löschen sollte nur erfolgen, wenn tatsächlich kein Hydrant mehr erkennbar ist.
Ist der Hydrant noch da, aber nicht mehr nutzbar, setzt man das emergency=fire_hydrant auf disused:emergency=fire_hydrant. So schließt man aus, dass jemand den Hydranten wieder neu einträgt.

Viele Grüße
小原酱 (2026-06-05 16:31:49+00:00): 问一下：通天塔是否重复
小原酱 (2026-06-05 16:32:30+00:00): 老塔早已被完全清理，遗迹不存在
SpaghettiMapper (2026-06-05 16:42:08+00:00): 并非重复。现在江心岛的通天塔是2012年前后，仿造古通天塔的样式重建的。古通天塔建筑已经被摧毁，仅存塔的基础。该基础即为古通天塔的遗址。
SpaghettiMapper (2026-06-05 16:44:33+00:00): 该遗址，根据我搜寻到的信息，“原塔基遗址处设置展示区，以钢化玻璃覆盖，直观展示明代原始塔基的砌筑工艺。”引用自：https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E9%9F%B6%E5%85%B3%E9%80%9A%E5%A4%A9%E5%A1%94
小原酱 (2026-06-07 05:59:41+00:00): 原塔基遗址处在https://pic.nfapp.southcn.com/media-nfh/image/202305/30/b130915804a0419987c24dd714204ed7.jpeg中很明显看不到，这个的来源https://pc.nfnews.com/2589/7860122.html是wiki的来源
小原酱 (2026-06-07 06:03:13+00:00): 原塔基遗址处设置展示区，以钢化玻璃覆盖，直观展示明代原始塔基的砌筑工艺。 在百度的图里面也不可见https://bkimg.cdn.bcebos.com/pic/37d3d539b6003af33a87e6480176d15c1038534318dd?x-bce-process=image/format,f_auto/watermark,image_d2F0ZXIvYmFpa2UyNzI,g_7,xp_5,yp_5,P_20/resize,m_lfit,limit_1,h_1080
小原酱 (2026-06-07 06:04:46+00:00): https://bkimg.cdn.bcebos.com/pic/0b46f21fbe096b63f6245867f66f9044ebf81a4c06cd?x-bce-process=image/format,f_auto/watermark,image_d2F0ZXIvYmFpa2UyNzI,g_7,xp_5,yp_5,P_20
更清晰的看到这个要不是不存在，要不是在塔里面
小原酱 (2026-06-07 06:11:52+00:00): 那么参考韶阳楼，很可能也是在塔里面当地板，韶阳楼如视频https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV17t41187Di/?spm_id_from=333.788.recommend_more_video.-1&trackid=web_related_0.router-related-2479604-gjmc5.1780812601925.448
SpaghettiMapper (2026-06-07 08:33:15+00:00): 我会倾向于认为，这两个遗址是被保存于塔内，而非直接被拆除。因为这两个遗址在2016年成为韶关市文物保护单位，直接被拆除的可能性并不大。https://www.sg.gov.cn/zw/sgszfgb/2016nd7q/content/post_1730305.html
小原酱 (2026-06-12 09:39:02+00:00): 是的，但是当地板就是和现塔一体了
小原酱 (2026-06-12 09:39:36+00:00): 韶阳楼就是
现塔
玻璃
原塔
这样子的
SpaghettiMapper (2026-06-12 09:54:45+00:00): 是这样。但是现塔与原塔仍然是两个不同的事物，只不过是前者覆盖了后者罢了。而且，我倾向于认为，遗址的历史文化意义，值得它们被单独标记出来。此时，处于室内的遗址就类似于一个indoor mapping这样子吧？
小原酱 (2026-06-12 10:33:01+00:00): 那我移动一下位置
SpaghettiMapper (2026-06-12 10:35:59+00:00): 好的，我之前增加这两个poi的时候猜测是它们处于室外。谢谢 :)
rempshaener (2026-06-06 12:51:06+00:00): Hallo,

du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Das sieht gut aus, ich habe nur eine Anmerkung:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13910906921: Farben werden in englischer Schreibweise angegeben, daher bitte gegen „red“ ersetzen.

Bei Fragen bitte melden.
Viele Grüße
Tomas09 (2026-06-06 12:54:32+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:colour für mehr darüber (;
TheSwavu (2026-06-05 05:20:42+00:00): Hello,

You have mapped the same dentist twice w1230315537 and n945250499.

Which one do you want to keep?

Thanks.
TheSwavu (2026-06-05 05:21:55+00:00): Same thing going on next door at n945249683
Didz (2026-06-05 07:03:33+00:00): Fixed.
Ltrlg (2026-06-05 05:45:45+00:00): Merci pour cet ajout, mais pourriez-vous pour vos prochaines modifications :

 – écrire un résumé de modification plus intelligible que « . » (par exemple « ajout d’une adresse ») ;
 – préciser vos sources (un simple « vu sur place » ou « BAN » suffit) ;
 – éviter d’ajouter une adresse à un chemin dont l’étiquette principale est building:part=* (un morceau de bâtiment) ;
 – utiliser pour addr:street=* la même typographie que celle utilisée pour le name=* de la rue correspondante (donc pas tout en majuscules) ?

Merci d’avance !
smaptious (2026-06-05 16:38:14+00:00): Correction: Source used was Vantor satellite imagery via Vantor Hub 2026-05-15
IIVQ (2026-06-05 18:47:38+00:00): I reverted your revert in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183710680. The station is permanently closed. See sources ttps://www.telesambre.be/info/la-station-villette-ferme-definitivement-ses-portes/80704 and https://www.dhnet.be/regions/charleroi/2026/05/29/une-station-de-metro-va-disparaitre-a-charleroi-construite-en-1976-la-metro-villette-ne-sert-quasiment-plus-depuis-un-nouveau-pont-en-1990-FHQJZVSYRRH6FMOMECPFL6WA7I/

I should have cited my sources in the original upload...
bxl-forever_repair (2026-06-14 14:24:41+00:00): Indeed, that is a fairly rare case, probably unique in modern times, with an underground station being closed for good.
FajrAl (2026-06-05 05:43:14+00:00): Gunakan tutorial interaktifnya. Objek yang belum ada di dunia nyata gunakan tag khusus seperti `propose` atau jika dalam pengerjaan: landuse=construction.
FajrAl (2026-06-05 05:37:38+00:00): This kampung should be tagged as "hamlet," because "village" is used for administrative PoI.
mavl (2026-06-10 06:44:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183906936 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping.
ieguy3 (2026-06-05 04:08:33+00:00): i need to map around rawson canyon since these private property owners have a conservation easement that keeps their property as ranches. but is not owned by the conservation authority
Baloo Uriza (2026-06-09 13:02:19+00:00): Doublecheck that one, looks like the tag got added as a value.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183673105
JeffSB (2026-06-09 14:16:11+00:00): Thank you for catching! Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183878212
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-15 09:56:04+00:00): Reverted adding SEO POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags, possibly sourced from Google Maps, in changeset 184128848

https://osm.org/changeset/184128848
mueschel (2026-06-08 08:28:38+00:00): Hi,
name:LT and name:amtrak somehow conflict with language codes and country codes in the name. 

There's "name:network:ABC" to make clear that ABC refers to an operator and not e.g. LT = Lithuania

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name:network:*
mavl (2026-06-10 06:44:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183906936 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping.
Svalbard (2026-06-05 17:00:30+00:00): Hallo zolarphoenix, hast Du Dich vor Ort davon überzeugt, dass es sich wirklich um ein Haus handelt? Gruß Svalbard
zolarphoenix (2026-06-07 18:24:29+00:00): Hallo Svalbard, ja, habe ich. Es handelt sich um einen offenen Carport, der zu Bocksberg 25 gehört. Es sollte zur bestehenden Hausnummer zugeordnet werden. Ich habe angenommen, dass das durch meine Angabe in StreetComplete passiert.
Gruß zolarphoenix
Svalbard (2026-06-07 19:02:33+00:00): Hallo zolarphoenix, das von Dir bearbeitete Gebäude war in OSM als Haus eingetragen. Diese Eintragung bestand seit etlichen Jahren. Ich nutze Streetcomplete nicht, vermute aber, dass aufgrund des Haus-Tags nach der fehlenden Adresse gefragt wurde. Die hast Du dann ergänzt, obwohl es sich nur um ein Carport handelt (hat keine Adresse und bedarf auch keiner Zuordnung). Ich habe deshalb „house“ auf „carport“ geändert und die Adresse gelöscht. Gruß Svalbard
mueschel (2026-06-08 08:24:24+00:00): Hi,
this school got two tags like "  Junior High School Section = 新北市立金山高級中學(國中部)". Is this something like the official names of the school parts?
林阿墩 (2026-06-09 02:50:42+00:00): Hi mueschel,

Yes, you are right. This school is a "comprehensive high school" (完全中學) in Taiwan, which officially contains both a Junior High School section (國中部) and a Senior High School section (高中部) within the same campus.

These are indeed their official names used for different parts of the school. Thank you for checking!
dmjab13 (2026-06-05 17:43:59+00:00): why did you modify things in both europe and america
silversurfer83 (2026-06-08 16:03:38+00:00): Hi World_Winner,

you removed a gate https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6721899799

According to current aerial images there is a gate at that place.

Why did you remove it?
World_Winner (2026-06-10 07:18:15+00:00): Hello dmjab13,
Thank you very much for pointing this out. Normally, bounding box is something I pay close attention to when making edits. This time unfortunately it slipped past me and I downloaded two different tasks onto the same data layer.
I appreciate you bringing it to my attention. I will take extra care in future edits to prevent this from happening again. Thank you for your feedback.
World_Winner (2026-06-10 07:18:46+00:00): Hello silversurfer83, thank you for reaching out. 
According to the feedback source, there was a curb at that location which was considered not passable by vehicles. So I performed my edits accordingly. 
I am happy to review the location, restore the features, and add access=private tag to the road geometries based on your feedback. 
Thanks again for reaching out.
mavl (2026-06-11 10:25:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183964099 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20794].
Piagno (2026-06-05 18:28:58+00:00): heyo thomaso
du hast richtig erkannt, dass Kaufdorf Bahnhof im Moment nicht angefahren wird, aber das liegt an Bauarbeiten. Sobald die Bauarbeiten beendet sind, wird er wieder angefahren. Deshalb hatte ich den Bahnhof hinzugefügt.
und danke dir fürs korrigieren der Relation :)
Thomaso58 (2026-06-06 08:57:48+00:00): Ich danke Dir. Lg Thomas
UltimateRiff (2026-06-08 21:54:34+00:00): confirmed route numbers and operators from an official pamphlet I got from a station dated July 18, 2022
Zverik (2026-06-07 20:44:50+00:00): Hey Martinus, you have added width=1.5 to some bicycle paths here. How did you measure that width?

Asking because I maintain the mapping project https://rattateed.osmz.ee/
Harvesterify (2026-06-06 17:36:27+00:00): Bonjour, deux remarques sur ce changeset :

- Il est préférable de séparer en deux changesets distincts quand les distances géographiques sont grandes. Là, vous avez seulement deux changements qui couvrent tout l'ouest de la France...
- Le tag "color" se fait en anglais si le code RGB n'est pas utilisé. Dans le cas présent, il faudrait changer "noir" en "black".

Bonne journée à vous, et bon mapping !
SNT_IND_Meudon (2026-06-07 08:09:36+00:00): Bonjour, 
C’est bien noté