piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
dopfen (2024-08-12 17:35:23+00:00): Hallo Zweila,
entschuldige die späte Antwort.
Mit "cycleway:left=track" wird an einem Weg "ein durch mehr als Bodenmarkierung abgesetzter Radfahrstreifen neben der Fahrbahn" gekennzeichnet (siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:cycleway%3Dtrack).
Diesen Radfahrstreifen kann ich hier in dem verkehrsberuhigten Bereich nicht vorfinden (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/79487582).

Ich gehe einfach mal davon aus, dass diese Kennzeichnung durch ein Versehen dort hingeraten ist. Korrigiere mich gerne, sollte das nicht der Fall sein.

Gruß Dopfen
Zweila (2024-08-12 21:24:52+00:00): Hallo Dopfen,
ok, ich verstehe. Du hast recht :-)

Gruß
Zweila
dopfen (2024-08-13 16:54:26+00:00): Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155205252
 und vielen Dank für Deine Rückmeldung!

Gruß Dopfen
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-07-29 09:49:53+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12000680212/history has fixme:type = house that was added in this edit
Is it an attempt to map a building not present in OSM data? Is it an attempt to add address info to an already mapped building? Something else?
johsin18 (2024-06-26 19:32:57+00:00): Hi Fabzgy,
ich habe die Station an den richtigen Ort verschoben (Parkplatz neben 17/1).  In allen möglichen Karten ist eine Ladestation bei Hausnummer 21 an der falschen Stelle eingetragen, ist aber eigentlich an obigem Ort.  Ob die Hausnummer 21 offiziell wirklich existiert, bezweifle ich.
Gruß, johsin18
Tomas Straupis (2024-06-22 14:23:09+00:00): Laba diena. Nereikia vietinių bendruomenių žymėti atskirais žemėnaudos objektais (landuse=residential). Užtenka tik pridėti tašką su neighbourghood ir tiek. Dabar landuse gavosi su topologijos klaidomis, tai reikės taisyti.
LanxtotVLN (2024-06-22 20:23:42+00:00): Žinosiu
bxl-forever (2024-06-22 14:41:20+00:00): This changeset contains edits in Siem Reap Angkor International Airport (Thailand) and in Brussels-National Airport (Belgium), that explains the unwanted giant bounding box.

I reverted the part for Brussels, which consisted in dragging two nodes 80 meters away from their real location, giving the taxiway a weird Z-shape. The part in Thailand seems to be okay, though.
takje (2024-06-23 05:17:52+00:00): My bad. The part in Brussels was for inspiration in the tagging and I must have accidentally moved a node. Apologies and thanks for reverting.
philippec (2024-06-22 18:30:49+00:00): dan teken ik de entrance erbij
db-ak (2024-08-05 15:52:49+00:00): Poprawiłem błędne zkazay ruchu rowerowego. Przed mostem dworcowym masz nawet dedykowany wjazd z drogi rowerowej na jezdnię mostu. Rowerem można jechać po moście. Dotyczy rowerzystów skręcającyh w lewo, ponieważ DPR na moście nie jest wyznaczony w tym kierunku (zgodnie z PoRD)
VLD549 (2024-07-26 07:45:24+00:00): Hi, are you sure this stretch is Leijsenhoek? On Bing Maps I see that number 27 belongs to the business Mayce's beauty and nails. Their website says it is Waterloostraat 27.

Thank you for letting me know.
tttnnn24 (2024-07-27 11:03:01+00:00): the strech between Markt (west) and Abdis van Thornstraat (east) is absolutely certain Leijsenhoek.

That street name as well as the buildings on it come straight from the governmental BAG (base administration buildings)

addr:city=Oosterhout
addr:housenumber=27
addr:postcode=4901ER
addr:street=Leijsenhoek
source:date=2014-05-07
source=BAG

I made no statement about any business in this changeset
VLD549 (2024-08-29 14:05:20+00:00): I trust your expertise and research, no doubt about that. Just be aware that BAG is not always up to date and therefore not to be trusted blindly.

Thank you for the communication.
db-ak (2024-08-05 15:55:21+00:00): Możesz przedstawić gdzie i jaka jest infrastruktura rowerowa na Jadwigii? Wstępnie usunąłęm zakazy. DPR jest tylko po północnej stronie, od ul. Garbary do Karmelickiej. Po południowej stronie po prostu jest szeroki chodnik. Więc ruch odbywa się jezdnią
eggie (2024-07-03 12:16:28+00:00): This is right?
A35K (2024-06-22 14:27:15+00:00): Hello, we usually use natural=tree for single trees (which is also rendered on the main Map)

For areas landuse=forest or natural=wood is a good choice.
Barroszt (2024-06-24 13:43:18+00:00): Dziękujemy za edycje w mieście Toruń i zapraszamy do dalszych edycji, np. dodanie brakującego punktu użyteczności publicznej, elementu małej architektury, nawierzchni drogi, ścieżki, drogi, ogrodzenia, barierki, korytarza, itd. Prawie wszystko, co znajduje się w rzeczywistości może zostać odzwierciedlone w OpenStreetMap, nawet hotel dla owadów, czy słupek pikietażowy, huśtawka bocianie gniazdo, kozioł oporowy, czy miejsce zbiórki do ewakuacji.
Leo Slager (2024-06-22 20:57:05+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Flawake (2024-06-22 21:17:55+00:00): Hallo, 

Dank je wel voor de nuttige informatie.
Leuk om zo ontvangen te worden.

Mvg,
Flawake
somix (2024-07-08 13:43:24+00:00): Здравствуйте! Буквы в адресах пишутся заглавными
bxl-forever (2024-06-22 14:46:35+00:00): This place was added one month ago (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11895344619), we removed the one you added today, which was a duplicate.
To avoid this problem, please make sure to always have a fresh copy of the dataset before editing.

In OsmAnd~, you can use Maps & Resources > Updates > Live updates > Belgium > Update now, which will update your local copy of the map data. :-)
Friendly_Ghost (2024-06-22 14:24:40+00:00): edit is voornamelijk in Limburg, met een brand:wikidata van een Fletcher hotel heel ergens anders
NeisBot (2024-06-22 14:28:24+00:00): Hi Zoommod, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/node/12000829588

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-22 14:35:16+00:00): Thank you for your mapped beach.
Looks good!

#HappyMapping
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-06-22 21:17:46+00:00): Please don't add unsourced tag changes.
Reverted in

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153046234
erickdeoliveiraleal (2024-07-10 16:06:43+00:00): não é correto colocar nomes genericos como fez em "Apartamentos" melhor deixar em branco.
Leo Slager (2024-06-22 20:59:57+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
wolfbert (2026-03-29 14:45:14+00:00): Hallo, das Gebäude https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/256572589 scheint die falsche Adresse zu haben.
wolfgang8 (2026-03-29 18:21:42+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis - das war eine deplatzierte Adresse in den BEV-Adressdaten vom 01.04.2024 die mittlerweile korrigiert wurde. 

https://bev.kolmann.at/map/#20/48.27402/16.20693

Ich hab das nun auch in OSM entsprechend angepasst.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180598229
wolfbert (2026-03-30 10:17:21+00:00): Danke!
LudovicG (2026-02-26 07:23:07+00:00): Bonjour,
Concernant le node 12000908124, je ne pense pas que ça soit un magasin photo mais plutôt la caméra de surveillance, déjà ajoutée sur osm ici node/12157477773 par ... vous-même 2 mois plus tard :)
Je vous propose de supprimer le shop=camera, replacer la camera à l'endroit du shop=camera et moi je voulais juste ajouter le miroir routier (à la place de l'actuelle camera).
Un avis ? :) (et dites-moi si vous faites ou si je fais)
joyclem (2026-02-27 11:57:48+00:00): Bonjour,

En effet, je n'ai pas du mettre à jour mes données.
Votre proposition me parait être bien, je vous laisse le faire :)
anshanin (2024-06-24 23:57:11+00:00): Hi, did you find any signs with number 80? I tried to do the same a few weeks ago and found only 78
Argbjorn (2024-06-25 07:39:36+00:00): Hi, anshanin! I'm pretty sure there're signs next to the staircase. I walked beside with EveryDoor and stopped for a while to sort this out. But I'll check it again when I'm in this neighborhood.
anshanin (2024-06-25 09:09:37+00:00): You may be right, this address exists in the cadaster but point is a bit behind a building:
44.808609, 20.479853	
If you have seen the sign on the building it means the location in the cadaster is wrong.
Calibrator (2025-12-21 11:28:32+00:00): А почему вы нарисовали на карте медицинский дефибриллятор в лесу?
alix_geovelo (2024-06-24 09:39:53+00:00): Bonjour
y a t il une signalétique ou un aménagement récent défissant comme piste cyclable ? Si il n'y a pas eu de changement récents, les attributs précédents sont préférables.
Merci !
dadavidov (2024-06-24 09:51:39+00:00): Salut Alix,
Et bien, qualitativement ça n'a plus rien à voir !
- revetement goudron
- belle largeur de l'aménagement

Cf photos
https://twitter.com/tapav_tours/status/1804514862304735651/photo/1
https://twitter.com/tapav_tours/status/1804514862304735651/photo/2

Si je ne me rappelle à avoir vu le panneau officiel VV en arrivant par St Avertin, il y a aussi des pictos piéton-vélo au sol pour rappeler le partage de la chaussée.

En tout cas, on est sur un aménagement similaire que la Loire à vélo à SPDC.

A plus,
akimapbuilder (2024-06-24 06:46:23+00:00): Hi! I had to revert your changeset since the waterbody you added overlaps with already existing waterbody.
MichS (2024-06-26 19:59:56+00:00): Hallo,

du hast den Straßennamen Streitmühle durch den Eigennamen Glan-Blies Radweg ersetzt. Der Weg ist durch die Umbennenung getrennt.

Es besteht eine Radwegrelation. Bitte den name-tag nur für Eigennamen verwenden.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:network#Radverkehrsnetze

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/Fahrradrouten_kartieren

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen_kartieren

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen#name_ist_nur_der_Name

MFG
Sajeevini sivajothy (2024-06-23 12:40:59+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work, and it looks good.#OMGuru#OSMCha
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153037123
sahshoor (2024-06-24 09:46:18+00:00): Between Melrose St, Vincent St.
fititnt (2024-06-22 17:57:07+00:00): Olá NICKS FF.

Algum motivo para ter alterado 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/427163235/history de natural=cliff para natural=coastline?

Caso não saiba, é melhor deixar como antes, pois isso pode quebrar geração de coastline da OpenStreetMap.
PeachyOne (2024-06-22 17:32:24+00:00): as discussed in the forum here:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mass-edit/114257/34
FajrAl (2026-05-22 11:20:30+00:00): see this discussion https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175469601
pavvv (2024-06-23 19:43:08+00:00): I don't think it's necessary to add check_date:* tags for stuff like passenger_information_display especially if they do already exist. It's not like ZDiUM is going to suddenly remove them, quite the opposite, more of them should appear in the future.
impiaaa (2024-06-22 20:06:17+00:00): Welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contribution! Unfortunately I'm going to revert the deletions in this changeset. Even if a business is closed (which you should verify first), the address still exists, and shouldn't be deleted.
impiaaa (2024-06-22 20:16:40+00:00): It can also be helpful for searching and editors working with old data to keep the old business information under a "disused" prefix: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
Flynn Marquardt (2024-06-23 16:11:58+00:00): Hello,
this changeset broke 4 borders, e.g. Mexiko https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/114686#map=16/26.5556/-99.1685 and USA, Texas, Tamaulipas.

Now these border do not close anymore and cannot not be used for reverse geocoding.

Can you fix/revert it? Esepcially the ways 307094006 and 307094017.
NeisBot (2024-06-22 18:04:25+00:00): Hi Emiliz, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature's:
https://osm.org/way/1295017569
https://osm.org/relation/8266548

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-23 06:43:10+00:00): Thank you for your mapped beaches.
Looks good!

#HappyMapping
Sajeevini sivajothy (2024-06-23 12:38:23+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work, and it looks good.#OMGuru#OSMCha
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153040221
Sajeevini sivajothy (2024-06-23 12:10:22+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work, and it looks good.#OMGuru#OSMCha
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153041223
Leo Slager (2024-06-22 21:27:41+00:00): Dag Albert,
De vijvers die je in changeset 1 en 6 hebt verwijderd, maakten deel uit van verschillende geneste multipolygoons.
Als resultaat van je fouten verschijnt er nu een groot wit vlak op de kaart.

Ik zal die mp's even repareren.

Wees voorzichtig met het zomaar verwijderen van vlakken van de kaart. Ga eerst na of die wellicht deel uit maken van een mp. Ga dan eerst na hoe de mp in elkaar zit en pas dan ook de mp op correcte wijze aan.

Als dat te ingewikkeld voor je is, roep dan hulp van een ervaren mapper in.

Groet
Leo
Albert V (2024-06-26 12:57:33+00:00): Hoi Leo, bedankt voor de reparaties.
Sajeevini sivajothy (2024-06-23 12:36:23+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work, and it looks good.#OMGuru#OSMCha
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153041537
NorthCrab_upload (2024-06-22 19:20:26+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/311152628

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
norgis (2024-07-10 19:36:29+00:00): I see that you have removed some nodes with street addresses placed within buildings, and added the addresses directly to the building polygons? FYI that is not how tagging is done in Norway, as explained in the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue/Address_import_for_Norway#Tagging_scheme

For future mappings it would be greatly appreciated if you make sure that your contributions are in accordance with local mapping schemes/practices before making such edits to the map.

The address-tags will be automatically removed by the next import, and the removed address-nodes will be re-added, so no harm done :)

Also, the highway=speed_camera you added is not a speed camera, so I'll fix that for you (it is a surveillace camera, as indicated by the sign).
CreCrePL (2024-07-10 22:56:49+00:00): Will do, thanks for informing me :)
mappinglander (2024-06-26 15:31:51+00:00): indeed not military, however the area belongs to the Barutsan; which is in turn a subsidiary of the MKEK, a %100 defence ministry-owned company according to the current structure.
and as far as i have geolocated from obscure sources and educated guess, the actual garrison command is in somewhere else - which I prefer mapping imprecisely in order to avoid any potential legal implications (there are extensive local prohibition regarding that) and meanwhile still keeping the deleted data.
mappinglander (2024-06-26 15:37:27+00:00): it should be noted however, such precise and correct information may be currently available on (semi-)public access, i.e. the official gazette or executive decisions; which doesn't have anything to do with me.
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-23 01:03:00+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153049891
NicaTopo (2024-06-23 00:04:03+00:00): Hi Tianlin,

Please square out all building shapes (99% of the buildings are square). Select a shape and press the "Q" key in the editor.

Thank you for contributing to OSM Nicaragua!
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-23 01:03:01+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153049891
rab (2024-06-22 21:05:11+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dwater_well
jambamkin (2024-12-23 19:22:12+00:00): Hello Wikilux, 
I am doing a MapRoulette challge to address rare surface= tag and I see you have used surface=fähbergweg on way/1295055694. Obvioulsy if this is useful it's good to keep it but if it can be replaced by a more common tag it would be tidier. 
Thanks
James
Wikilux (2024-12-23 20:23:16+00:00): Hi James
I just fixed the typo and added some new buildings, street names, and addresses.
Wikilux
misterte (2024-07-01 08:52:20+00:00): Hi,
das Thema hatten wir schon öfter: Also nochmal, Solaranlagen auf dem Dach bekommen kein building=roof + layer=1 sondern generator:place=roof
Sajeevini sivajothy (2024-06-23 11:57:56+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work, and it looks good.#OMGuru#OSMCha
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153044855
ivanbranco (2025-08-10 11:54:10+00:00): Ciao,

qualcosa è andato storto qui: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1103510748
mini-me (2024-06-23 09:22:53+00:00): По-моему, там ещё нет ни перехода, ни остановок. И может даже не предполагается ибо посреди дороги разделитель с высоким бордюром.
dypa (2024-06-23 10:02:13+00:00): Проектная документация https://zakupki.gov.ru/epz/order/notice/ok20/view/documents.html?regNumber=0172200002522000283 файл `Приложение_№1._Описание_объекта_закупки_Колпинское_ш._(Танкистов)` в нем файл `Том 3.1 Дорожные работы`, лист 92 - переход и остановки предполагаются (занижение есть, как и у дороги на ДСК правее)
tyfi (2024-06-22 20:52:44+00:00): On second thought, this is Crystal City. Working on an update
tyfi (2024-06-22 20:43:12+00:00): Looks like this originated from TIGER
gscholz (2024-09-17 09:00:31+00:00): Hi Pedrohh90,
this changeset has destroyed the boundary relation of "Mandacaru":

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3064765/history

I have just fixed this.
Kind regards
Guido
RobotFK (2024-06-23 07:06:36+00:00): Hallo, 
Danke für deine eintragungen.
Kannst du für mich noch begründen warum das Servicegebäude unserer vergangenen diskusion die Adresse "Selikumer Straße" erhalten hat ?
So weit ich es sehen kann ist dieses Straße ja nicht vom Gebäude aus zu erreichen ohne das mehrere andere Straßen zu kreuzen sind.

Viele Grüße
rempshaener (2024-06-23 07:34:47+00:00): Hallo,
ja klar: ich habs falsch reinkopiert :-(
Ist aber vielleicht ein gutes Beispiel: ich habe https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12001504658 ergänzt. 
Die Selikumer Straße 1a gibt es in Neuss nicht offiziell, aber egal: ausgeschildert ist es, das reicht.
Danke für den Hinweis!
Leo Slager (2024-06-23 15:39:08+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Leo Slager (2024-06-23 15:44:42+00:00): feedback:
Je hebt het gebouw nu uitgelijnd op de omtrek van het dak.
De luchtfoto is onder een bepallde hoek genomen. Dat betekent dat de zijgevel van het gebouw aan de Zzijde zichtbaar is. En dus is het gebouw nu een meter of 10 naar het N verschoven ten opzichte van de ligging van het gebouw op maaiveldhoogte.

Ik schuif het gebouw weer terug naar de juiste positie.

Verder is het goed om te weten dat gebouwen en adressen rechtstreeks worden geïmporteerd vanuit de BAG van het Kadaster. De ligging van het gebouw is dus precies ingemeten.
Leo Slager (2024-06-23 15:51:58+00:00): De import van de nieuwe adressen is aangevraagd in het forum.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-06-23 21:37:50+00:00): Please don't add temporary restrictions to the map as inaccessible oneways. Use conditional restrictions instead.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_map_temporary_events_and_temporary_features
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Conditional_restrictions
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Vandalism
Reverted in

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153086662
welzheimerwald (2024-08-27 21:36:03+00:00): Moin,
ist es wirklich berechtigt, die Hummelgautsche aka Vaihinghofer Sägmühle als "isolated_dwelling" zu taggen? Dort unten wohnt schon lange niemand mehr, auch in der Hauptsatzung der Gde. Alfdorf ist die Lokalität nicht als amtlicher Wohnplatz ausgewiesen (s. https://www.alfdorf.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Dokumente/Ortsrechtsammlung/Hauptsatzung/hauptsatzung_aktuelle_fassung.pdf). Besser fände ich ein Tagging mit place="locality".

Angemerkt sei noch, dass der Name sowieso schon als alt_name des Mühlgebäudes getaggt ist.

Gruß
welzheimerwald
kitsee (2024-06-23 21:03:57+00:00): hi there, would you be able to provide the source of these house names. Thanks.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153046735
Sofia_111 (2024-06-23 21:06:57+00:00): 1972 directory.
rskedgell (2024-07-22 13:17:09+00:00): No, not more accurate. This looks suspiciously like more tagging for the renderer

Please read the documentation, particularly the part which states that in the UK, highway=trunk applies to "Primary A road (green signs)". This section of the A413 has white signs and was correctly mapped as highway=primary.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtrunk

Reverted, obviously. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154262968
Langlaeufer (2024-06-25 13:09:47+00:00): War es Absicht, dass du hier bicycle=no belassen hast? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1295080052
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153047146
HanSte23 (2024-06-25 22:03:36+00:00): Ja, an dem vorderen Stückchen war ein 239, dort ist auch noch eine Straße parallel.
SekeRob (2024-06-23 14:00:49+00:00): Hi,

Something is not right with the French state boundary you touched with this edit as it is presently highlighted in the area view of OSM Inspector

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=9.44789&lat=42.06195&zoom=9&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.50&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

ciao
rskedgell (2024-06-23 05:46:03+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for updating the map.

Although the iD editor you're using unhelpfully presents all the common access tags as if they all need to be completed, you usually don't need to change them on highway=footway lines. The default access allows pedestrians and forbids everything else. The other access tags are only needed where there are exceptions.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#United_Kingdom
Jan Olieslagers (2024-06-23 12:36:26+00:00): Regarding the "heliport" on the parking lot: I would rather call it a helipad. "Heliport" suggests some infrastructure, hangar, fuel pump, perhaps even an office cum passenger accomodation. Here there isn't even a windsock, as far as I can see on www imagery.