piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
FajrAl (2026-03-09 15:02:05+00:00): Perihal perbedaan dusun dengan kampung, itu sudah menjadi bahan diskusi di komunitas OSM Indonesia. Bila ada pertanyaan lain, bisa gabung ke komunitasnya via Telegram.
Đuro Jiří (2026-03-15 07:30:57+00:00): Attenzione,tower:costruction=* e material=* sono due cose diverse.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tower:construction?uselang=hr
IvaKraljić (2026-03-10 15:02:31+00:00): The wrong tag has since been fixed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179643124. #OptimoRoute
eggie (2026-03-08 21:16:47+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
IvaKraljić (2026-03-10 15:02:23+00:00): The wrong tag has since been fixed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179643227. #OptimoRoute
IvaKraljić (2026-03-10 15:02:27+00:00): The wrong tag has since been fixed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179643179. #OptimoRoute
eggie (2026-03-08 21:20:00+00:00): Dag rupje2  Ik heb noexit=yes van de weg verwijderd. Dat klopte al niet.

MVG
eggie
NeisBot (2026-03-08 20:42:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/852000268 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Holiday villa"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-03-17 05:33:04+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/179553063
Wildsharky (2026-03-10 05:07:14+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:179559999
eggie (2026-03-08 21:22:43+00:00): Tip.. Probeer aan te geven wat je hebt aangepast. 
Gebouwen zijn ingemeten import vanuit het Kadaster.
De luchtfoto's zijn schuin genomen. Daardoor vertekening als je naar de daken kijkt.
MVG
eggie
b-jazz (2026-03-09 18:53:07+00:00): Thanks for the golf course work you are putting in. In the future, please avoid deleting an object only to recreate it later. It destroys history of the object that might be important. It's always best to modify an object. It's not always possible, but it should be preferred. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history 

Thanks.
bvonsyring (2026-03-09 19:32:26+00:00): Thank you for letting me know. I will do that going forward.
IvaKraljić (2026-03-08 20:58:29+00:00): The unnecessary node has since been deleted in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179551142. #OptimoRoute
eggie (2026-03-08 21:30:19+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
MijdeMijs (2026-03-08 21:38:40+00:00): Hartelijk dank Eggie!
IvaKraljić (2026-03-10 15:02:19+00:00): The wrong tag has since been fixed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179643299. #OptimoRoute
YomanNH (2026-03-23 14:05:47+00:00): "jak co naprawiać" - ok, wycofałem zmiany.

Sprawdź jaką relację edytowałeś i do czego ona służy. Chociaż i tak pewnie tego nie sprawdzisz...
eggie (2026-03-08 21:36:54+00:00): Dag Duncan,

Wanneer dit een woonwijk is kun je een vlak landuse=residential over het wijkje leggen.
motor_vehicle=yes hoeft niet getagd te worden op reguliere wegen.

MVG
eggie
NeisBot (2026-03-08 21:12:46+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13591387835 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Waschsalon am Rotebühlplatz"
---
Zum Beispiel könnte eine neutralere und sachlichere Version deines Textes lauten: "Waschsalon am Rotebühlplatz"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-17 05:33:05+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179982387
(Restore previous tags. No changes)

If you believe this was incorrect or would like to clarify the intent of the original tags, please reply here.
Dwaalgast (2026-03-08 21:10:24+00:00): Added buildings
MappingMore (2026-03-10 05:53:33+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:179617839
MappingMore (2026-03-11 05:02:49+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:179672254
margin-auto (2026-03-14 12:27:50+00:00): Hm. also für mich ist die Kupferbergterrase das vorne vor der Wohnanlage mit Blick auf die Stadt. Weiß nicht, ob es so sinnvoll ist, den Knoten mitten in die Anlage reinzulegen.
synthfi (2026-03-08 21:41:57+00:00): Checked bus stop ids with YourBus MBTA
synthfi (2026-03-08 21:42:14+00:00): also moved bus stops to being connected with foot paths
eggie (2026-03-08 21:43:05+00:00): Commentaar moet zijn noexit=yes verwijderd. Dat klopte hier niet.
NeisBot (2026-03-08 21:48:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 65 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/652499472 v3 | 26 crossings
https://osm.org/way/671788922 v2 | 14 crossings
https://osm.org/way/27693895 v24 | 13 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179552450
iandees (2026-03-08 21:55:00+00:00): Hi! It looks like a node in this changeset was accidentally moved. This can happen when panning the map. The node has been moved back to its previous position.
flohoff (2026-03-09 09:32:17+00:00): Der Punkt mit Forst innerstädtisch ist das es eben keine FORSTnutzung ist. 

Es werden dort ja nicht Bäume zur Holzgewinnung eingeschlagen. Deshalb sind ist das mit dem Forest innerstädtisch IMHO in den allermeisten fällen falsch.

Und die Bäume werden ja auch nciht wie Straßenbäume einzeln gepflegt. Das sind schon eher flächen die sich selber überlassen werden.

Flo
stirps (2026-03-09 10:11:24+00:00): Ich hatte mich da an die vom Wiki gegebene Definition gehalten, das hatte natural=scrub als "Uncultivated land covered with shrubs, bushes or stunted trees" bezeichnet und landuse=forest als "A forest or woodland is a natural or semi-natural area covered by trees, which may or may not be used to produce forestry products such as wood and timber."

Ich hatte mich halt hauptsächlich an dem "stunted trees" aufgehangen (was ja niicht wirklich zutrifft, da stehen ja wirklich größere Bäume). Ich kanns aber zurückändern wenn gewünscht
flohoff (2026-03-09 12:27:02+00:00): Bei dem landuse= vs. natural= ist für mich die unterscheidung das dinge bei "landuse" wirklich GENUTZT werden. Deshalb ist landuse=grass (Wie ja auch im Wiki ausgeführt) völliger unsinn. Ebenso wie flowerbed.

Bei natural geht es um flächen die weitgehend sich selber überlassen sind. 

Und aktive Forstwirtschaft findet im Städtischen raum nicht stadt. 

Man könnte auch ein natural=wood nehmen wobei das eigentlich für "urwälder" gedacht ist.

In der Idealen welt sollte das alles gar nicht in der landuse kategorie sein - das sind alles "residential" oder "retail" flächen wo halt bäume stehen.

Das sollte eigentlich im landcover= abgebildet sein.

Aber da das nicht gerendert wird fängt jeder mapper an mit landuse micromapping zu betreiben und missbraucht da das tagging.
Higashimado (2026-03-08 22:37:48+00:00): 穗深等地的部分 name:en 中带有通名翻译 "Sub-district"，和全国其他地方的翻译约定不一致，不知有何原因？如果却有需要可以留言，看看是通过 partial revert 把通名加回去，还是把带通名的翻译挪到 official_name:en 里
mweper (2026-03-08 23:41:30+00:00): Si el edificio todavía existe, no se deberían borrar las etiquetas respectivas a este, sino solo las que corresponden al PDI en cuestión.
NeisBot (2026-03-08 22:30:49+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/9781023655 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Smartphone repair shop"
---
Par exemple, une version plus neutre et factuelle de ton texte pourrait être : « Atelier de réparation de smartphones »
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-17 05:33:09+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179982392
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
flohoff (2026-03-09 09:34:11+00:00): Das in der Mitte ist ja kein Barrier in der mitte eines Weges. Das ist die Bühne. 

Nur etwas einzutragen damit da was ist mit völlig falschen tags ist irgendwie nicht so passend.

Flo
stirps (2026-03-09 10:18:39+00:00): Interessant, ich hatte das immer höchstens als Platz zum Sitzen wahrgenommen. Was wäre besser geeignet, wirklich als Bühne mappen? Wenn ich das richtig verstanden hatte wird barrier=block öfter mal als soetwas verwendet, ich hatte auch noch natural=stone im Blick, aber das ist ja menschengemacht und kein Stein der da rumliegt
flohoff (2026-03-09 12:18:39+00:00): Freitag18 - Steht typischerweise das Schlagzeug drauf.

Und barrier= ist eine barriere in einem weg - also node in einem highway. Das ich die bollards= auch neben dem weg - also nummernscharf mappe hat was mit dem Pömpelerlass des Landes NRW zu tun und den Presseveröffentlichungen der Stadt.
stirps (2026-03-09 13:20:29+00:00): Ok ich habe es zu amenity=stage abgeändert
flohoff (2026-03-10 09:17:36+00:00): Ja - besser.

Aber die Aussage war noch eine andere. 

"Mehr Details ist nicht immer besser."

Das ist alles zeugs was irgendwer pflegen muss. Ich mache jetzt seit 18 Jahren OSM - Und ständig wird neues eingepflegt. Statistisch verschwinden Mapper nach 3 Monaten. Und dann bleibt der ganze kram dekaden bei OSM drin obwohl die objekte in der realität weg sind oder sich längst verändert haben.

Ich habe schon zig mal in Gütersloh, Rheda und Bielefeld von Mappern das zeugs aufräumen müssen was sie ja "nur gut gemeint haben". 

Deshalb muss man sich gut überlegen wer und wie das weitergepflegt werden soll und das im kontext wofür das gut ist.

Das da jetzt eine amenity=stage ist ist für welche Datennutzung relevant? Wer wertet das aus?

Und das sollte man sich für jedes OSM objekt fragen - Wer pflegt das wie weiter wenn ich aufhöre. Und kann ICH das für die nächsten 10 Jahre leisten da immer wieder hin zu gehen und es zu kontrollieren.

Deshalb Fotografiere ich GT strukturiert seit 15 Jahren immer und immer wieder flächendeckend. Bei vielen dingen kann ich nachweisen wann sie da waren und wann wieder weg.

Flo
ralley (2026-03-08 23:20:09+00:00): What were you trying to accomplish here?  You have changed a city to a restaurant
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179554144
CoyKoi (2026-03-09 03:24:19+00:00): I have reverted the changeset
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179554144
NeisBot (2026-03-08 23:21:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/9781023655 v5

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Repair shop"
---
Par exemple, une version plus neutre et factuelle de ton texte pourrait être : « Atelier de réparation »
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-03-17 05:33:10+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/179554689
MassCartog (2026-03-09 14:16:17+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM. The feature you removed in this changeset is actually valid. It's clear that these features still exist on the ground. Not being public access areas is an invalid reason to remove data from OSM.

You have a new account and might not be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground. If it exists on the ground, it is valid data regardless of a feature being public or private, designated or informal/illegal/unauthorized. Removing features that exist is actually considered vandalism.

The correct way to handle this is to use OSM's tagging system. access=private, or access=no would be appropriate if they are closed to the public. Once this is done, services that do use OSM data will reflect that and specify their access.

In this case the feature was already tagged as private and a driveway, so it was correctly tagged. But if you see something like a road that extends too far into a driveway, you can split the road, and update the new part into a driveway feature type and set it private. That's better than removing something that is already mapped.

Thanks for your work updating your area!  

Please read this for more info:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won't_delete_roads_on_private_property
NeisBot (2026-03-08 23:30:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/9781023655 v7

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Repair workshop"
---
Par exemple, une version plus neutre et factuelle de ton texte pourrait être : « Atelier de réparation »
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-03-17 05:33:11+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/179982392
flohoff (2026-03-09 09:27:12+00:00): Woher kommt hier das designated? Das ist ein Bürgersteig mit "Fahrrad frei" - Kein Z240 oder?

Demnach müsste das doch bicycle=yes sein oder?

Flo
stirps (2026-03-09 10:23:52+00:00): Es steht kein Schild dort nach dem was ich so gesehen habe aber ich würde schon sagen dass das Infrastruktur für Fahrradfahrende ist, es geht eben entgegen der Einbahnstraße und auf dem Bürgersteig ist rote Pflasterung. Das Tagging hält im Endeffekt ja auch keinen davon ab auch auf der Straße zu fahren
flohoff (2026-03-09 12:20:38+00:00): Da - Z267 + Fahrrad frei.

Das designated gehört IMHO nur auf wege die ein Z240 ff. oder Piktogramme tragen.

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=296840028816013
NeisBot (2026-03-09 00:39:49+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/9781023655 v8

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Repair shop"
---
Par exemple, une version plus neutre et factuelle de ton texte pourrait être : « Atelier de réparation »
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-03-17 05:33:12+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/179982392
Wildsharky (2026-03-10 05:08:30+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:179562104
Taya_S (2026-03-09 08:13:29+00:00): Reverted sockpuppet edits

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179567705
Taya_S (2026-03-09 08:13:30+00:00): Reverted sockpuppet edits

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179567705
eggie (2026-03-09 08:02:54+00:00): Info samengevoegd met bestaande adresnode
ajmat (2026-03-09 08:02:25+00:00): Reverted in changeset id: 179567297
ajmat (2026-03-09 07:51:18+00:00): Reverted in changeset id: 179564975
flohoff (2026-03-09 09:16:19+00:00): Mit dem changeset ist hier ziemlich viel kaputt gegangen. Angebglich sind jetzt die Tribünen und auch die Rasenfläche selber wald. Das ist so ziemlicher Bullshit.

Ich versuche das mal zu reparieren.

Flo
Taya_S (2026-03-09 08:13:31+00:00): Reverted sockpuppet edits

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179567705
iandees (2026-03-09 01:26:46+00:00): Hi! It looks like a node in this changeset was accidentally moved. This can happen when panning the map. The node has been moved back to its previous position.
iandees (2026-03-09 01:27:05+00:00): Hi! It looks like a node in this changeset was accidentally moved. This can happen when panning the map. The node has been moved back to its previous position.
MappingMore (2026-03-10 06:26:13+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:179619237
NeisBot (2026-03-09 00:51:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 38 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/305494659 v7 | 19 crossings
https://osm.org/way/492887856 v8 | 10 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1131873829 v1 | 9 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/7184888853 v3
https://osm.org/node/10553916358 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179555893
iandees (2026-03-09 01:27:24+00:00): Hi! It looks like a node in this changeset was accidentally moved. This can happen when panning the map. The node has been moved back to its previous position.
kylor (2026-03-27 21:03:36+00:00): please map parking spaces correctly. here is an example https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/45.425272/-122.781460&layers=N
kylor (2026-03-27 21:04:31+00:00): glue them together as a grid
Hinojal (2026-03-09 01:56:49+00:00): Automated edit using osmapi. The bus network SIGA, and more specifically its operator Horários do Funchal, started today (09/03/2026) with the change of numeration and denomination of all its bus routes. To more faster and more securely update the Key:route_ref on all 1556 bus stops in the city of Funchal that had at least one route from Horários do Funchal, I created a script, which I show and explain below.

The query to get the bus stops was
area(id:3608421413)->.searchArea;node["public_transport"="platform"]["route_ref"](area.searchArea);out;

Then, I created a map dictionary ("rrefs_dict") with the old reference numbers and the new reference numbers.

The code is as follows:
osm = osmapi.OsmApi()

def update_refs(value, rrefs_dict):
    rrefs = value.split(";")
    new_rrefs = [rrefs_dict.get(rref.strip(), rref.strip()) for rref in rrefs]
    return ";".join(new_rrefs)

with osm.changeset(CHANGESETINFO):
    for node in search.nodes:
        old_refs = node.tags.get("route_ref")
        if old_refs is None:
            continue

        new_refs = update_refs(old_refs, rrefs_dict)

        if new_refs != old_refs:
            node_data = osm.NodeGet(node.id)
            node_data["tag"]["route_ref"] = new_refs
            osm.NodeUpdate(node_data)

This way, bus stops without a bus route from Horários do Funchal were skipped, and bus routes from other operators were not changed and stayed in place. Related changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179556104. More information about the SIGA network and bus transport in Madeira at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/SIGA.
MappingMore (2026-03-10 00:25:45+00:00): Revert of 179555893
CoyKoi (2026-03-09 03:06:58+00:00): Welcome to OSM, I have reviewed your changeset. These are good additions, thank you. I do have two points of feedback: Firstly, you have added an amenity=post_box but I think it's meant to be amenity=letter_box. You can read the distinction on OSM Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dletter_box

For the buildings you've added, a small improvement you can do is to square the corners of buildings to perfect 90 degrees. This can be done with shortcut Q when the building is selected.

Cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179556465
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2026-03-09 11:34:18+00:00): Vandalism
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2026-03-09 11:38:25+00:00): Please provide the source for this data, and explain the rationale.
woodpeck (2026-03-20 20:33:38+00:00): Dear AdamVista, aerial imagery does not show any construction going on here. It is possible that imagery is outdated but you will have to provide sources that show there is actual construction going on.
❤️‍🔥 (2026-03-13 10:10:46+00:00): is this forest really called 'Tree1'? that seems very unlikely
ralley (2026-03-09 06:04:11+00:00): The name field is for real names only, not descriptions like "New houses are being built".  Also building=house is for individual houses not a development area of multiple houses
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179556695
Wildsharky (2026-03-11 12:23:25+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: 179635034
Wildsharky (2026-03-11 12:16:13+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:179624209
MappingMore (2026-03-10 07:37:54+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:179622889
aTarom (2026-03-09 17:59:19+00:00): Hola, he visto de nuevo la "ṕ" corregida, si se trata de un error del cartel la p con acento, no lo trasladamos a openstreetmap, lo comento con los compañeros en
https://t.me/osmcat/72038
Saludos
Monolo23 (2026-03-09 21:08:37+00:00): Buenas, perfecto, lo apunto para próximas ediciones!
aTarom (2026-03-10 08:01:14+00:00): Perfecto!!! muchas gracias por la corrección, un placer así :D
Saludos y feliz mapeo
FajrAl (2026-03-09 03:48:43+00:00): Pengguna baru dengan editor JOSM? Ini hasil edit yang kritis. Boleh dijelaskan hasil editnya kenapa menghapus banyak fitur besar yang bersifat penting?
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-09 07:24:21+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

IMHO this changeset should be reverted, see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179557022
Taya_S (2026-03-09 14:25:31+00:00): Reverted changeset that deleted a lot of data

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179588318