piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
OneMoreSCAccount (2026-07-22 17:18:28+00:00): Дай вгадаю що вони скажуть. Що вандалів серед нас немає. А суперечки треба вирішувати в спільноті. І ще можливо, що тобі не треба атакувати інших, і ставити їм дедлайни в 1 день.
eggie (2026-07-09 16:43:39+00:00): Dag bah... Wanneer hier gebouwd wordt kun je beter import aanvragen. De adresnodes komen dan ook mee. Hebben de gebouwen werkelijk deze naam?????

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-07-09 16:47:13+00:00): Ik heb om import gevraagd
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/bag-importverzoeken/3394/4698
bah52 (2026-07-09 17:56:22+00:00): Voor mij is dit de eerste keer dat ik dit doe en ik heb nog niet gelezen dat er een import funktie is. Ik leer het graag. De 3 grondgebonden rijen zijn allemaal onderdeel van knarrenhof westergouwe in Gouda. Tot nu toe was alleen het bijbehorende appartementen complex zichtbaar met huisnummers. Mijn bedoeling was dus de rest zichtbaar te maken. Wij hebben als toekostige bewoners het complex Gouwehof gedoopt. Excuus als ik het verkeerd heb gedaan. Moet ik een en ander weer verwijderen? Vrgr Bas
eggie (2026-07-09 18:03:48+00:00): Hoi Bas... Laat maar gewoon staan. Dat doet de BAG importeur wel.
Tja.. er zit een hele wereld achter OSM, waar je als starter nog geen idee hebt. Neis maar eens rond op het forum.
Je kunt even in de gaten houden of er daadwerkelijk wordt geïmporteerd.
Soms schiet een import er wel eens bij in.. en dan kun je nogmaals om import vragen.
Eigenlijk zijn gebouwen en adressen de belangrijkste import.
Import is aan regels gebonden.
Mapse,
eggie
eggie (2026-07-10 05:56:17+00:00): En weer geïmporteerd.. https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/bag-importverzoeken/3394/4701
Zou er niet de naam van het project opzetten.
Gr eggie
bxl-forever (2026-07-09 20:26:22+00:00): Hello,

After inspecting this recent picture taken by a fellow mapper, 
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=846318651849240 I would say that kerb=lowered, which was your previous choice when editing with StreetComplete, is the most appropriate value.

kerb=raised is for significant steps, usually about 15 cm, i.e. when the municipality made no effort at all to lower the kerb.  Contrary to here, where we can clearly see that they lowered the kerb.

We work with people in wheelchairs and setting this tag correctly is extremely important to them.  The typical values we use are: raised > lowered > flush.  They determine the level of effort people will have to make to cross the road.

Shall I undo this edit?
Gulp2096 (2026-07-10 06:03:06+00:00): Hi,
Thank you for noticing this and explaining it clearly.
I made another edit to update the values correctly:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5733618868

Thank you!
Gulp2096 (2026-07-10 06:07:35+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185453286
balint36 (2026-07-25 00:13:10+00:00): Kérlek, fuss neki megint a címkézési szabályoknak és a HÜSZ-nek, mert aszerint számozunk. Ezt visszavonom.
kojott (2026-07-10 09:54:50+00:00): czy to też fikcja? https://zabytek.pl/pl/obiekty/zabytek?inspire_id=PL.1.9.ZIPOZ.NID_A_16_AR.47414&rejestr=rejestr-zabytkow
maraf24 (2026-07-10 20:35:14+00:00): W 100% te nasypy, które były tu wyrysowane, nie istnieją.
Samo zaś dawne grodzisko jest niemapowalne, skoro nic tu nie widać.
EdLoach (2026-07-10 08:04:30+00:00): From a pedestrian routing perspective it is better to add the sidewalk tag to the highways, rather than mapping them as separate ways. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sidewalk Some of Clacton (though not centrally) has already been mapped this way.
A Hall (2026-07-23 15:08:15+00:00): Hello Utible,

Can you explain why you're stripping the name= from VT state highways in Hardwick? I did a massive effort to make sure all sections of state highways had the name= filled in. In the absence of road signs, we utilize the names from the E911 data set for stretches of road.
pitscheplatsch (2026-07-14 20:08:07+00:00): Hallo, 
mir ist aufgefallen, dass in diesem und in weiteren Änderungssätzen Öffnungszeiten, Bewertungen, Beschreibungen und Quellenangaben in name=* eingetragen wurden.

name=* sollte nur den tatsächlichen, vor Ort verwendeten Namen des Campingplatzes enthalten. Angaben wie „bis 12.10.“, „guter Platz“, Bewertungen oder „Quelle KI“ gehören nicht in den Namen. Wiederkehrende saisonale Öffnungszeiten können gegebenenfalls mit opening_hours=* erfasst werden.

Bitte prüfe und korrigiere die betroffenen Objekte. Kannst du außerdem erläutern, welche Quellen du verwendet hast? Daten aus Google Maps, AllStays, Park4Night oder anderen proprietären Quellen dürfen nicht ohne eine ausdrücklich mit OSM kompatible Erlaubnis übernommen werden.

Danke!

---

Hello, 
I noticed that opening dates, ratings, descriptions, and source information have been added to name=* in this and other changesets.

name=* should contain only the actual name used for the campsite. Information such as “open until 12 October,” “good place,” ratings, or “source: AI” should not be part of the name. Recurring seasonal opening times may be recorded using opening_hours=*, where appropriate.

Please review and correct the affected objects. Could you also explain which sources you used? Data from Google Maps, AllStays, Park4Night, or other proprietary sources must not be copied unless there is explicit permission compatible with OSM.

Thank you!
eggie (2026-07-09 20:53:19+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Frans S (2026-07-10 14:28:30+00:00): hello. Thanks for mapping
Please map only buildings. Not the complete plot with yard.
Check this webpage 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1536919508/history#map=19/10.590648/-67.057339
Best regards
ArG Faubourg (2026-07-09 19:42:05+00:00): Super, je vous en suis très reconnaissant !
Merci beaucoup !
Ejeoxlac (2026-07-10 04:39:24+00:00): A las calles trata de poner el nombre de la calle en "Nombre" y no en "Referencia de la carretera" ya que este  es utilizado para números o códigos de referencia. De uso común para carreteras, salidas de autopista, rutas, etc.
maro21 (2026-07-12 22:23:51+00:00): Na chodniku jest to studio tatuażu??
PCK46 (2026-07-28 09:32:45+00:00): Ten most jest krzywo. Należałoby najlepiej przywrócić poprzednią edycję i wtedy przeprowadzić edycję linii bez jej ruszania.
Đuro Jiří (2026-07-21 12:51:54+00:00): Posso sapere dove hai discusso ste modifiche? Tra l'altro "Grao" è in che lingua?
Yunan973 (2026-07-10 15:11:00+00:00): Hello,

according to Esri imagery in this area, your coastlines are wrong because under water

Regards
Hugoren Martinako (2026-07-10 16:11:17+00:00): Hi there, first off, in Spain we don't use Esri for imagery alignment, the official source is PNOA (since you've edited on iD, you'll have noticed PNOA is the default source for Asturias).

Secondly, in case you're not familiar with, a lot of beaches along the Biscay bay have a big difference between low and high tide. That implies a wide gap to map the coastline accordingly (indeed, I shrunk the beach size). You may take a look at other available imageries to check that out.

I just mapped a middle ground, roughly.

BR
Yunan973 (2026-07-12 17:19:27+00:00): PNOA is good for coastline ONLY if imagery has been taken at high tide because coastline is the line of the coast at HIGH tide, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:natural%3Dcoastline.

If imagery has been taken at another time, your coastline will be wrong.
And according to Esri, your coastline is wrong because POAS imagery is not at high tide.

Here the good coastline :
https://www.bing.com/maps?form=MA13FV&cp=43.432587%7E-4.808331&lvl=17.2&style=r

also visible (in iD) with Esri beta or with Cartografía Ráster del IGN (I don't know if you have these imageries in JOSM)
Hugoren Martinako (2026-07-13 17:53:15+00:00): OK, fixed. I adjust them to the IGN raster map, kind of.
pitscheplatsch (2026-07-09 19:48:31+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
Is the added name real?
A hole in the fence (12737381753), v2
kojott (2026-07-10 09:23:26+00:00): fikcja? https://zabytek.pl/pl/obiekty/grodzisko-635589
maraf24 (2026-07-10 20:31:47+00:00): Tak, fikcja. Nie ma tu nasypów.
Źródło ma podać autor edycji, no ale i tak nic tu nie widać.
kojott (2026-07-10 08:55:17+00:00): https://zabytek.pl/pl/obiekty/g-289619
maraf24 (2026-07-10 20:30:29+00:00): Czy autor edycji przeanalizował opis oraz podał źródło?
Đuro Jiří (2026-07-29 19:24:53+00:00): "This key is set to the primary name of the feature in the real world. It is the most important of several name-related keys."
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-10 08:40:31+00:00): SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. See https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more information.

Reverted adding SEO spam POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags, likely sourced from Google Maps, in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/185460270
TheodoreTNB (2026-07-09 20:12:07+00:00): Здраво, буди слободан и стајалишта што у себи имају 'Р' или друге скраћенце испиши пуним именом: типа  'Р' - 'раскрсница' или 'Н' - 'насеље'. Јер ће у супротном да крене МалиМрав да 'шизи', пошто има неко ОСМ правило да се на мапама пишу пуни називи да не дође до конфузије са скраћеницама. Мада се за ВКФ слаћем да остане скрашено, јер га тако користи Бортравел. Хвала!
lc59 (2026-07-09 21:01:10+00:00): Договорено. Хвала на сугестији!
Mystic_lv_ (2026-07-09 18:49:27+00:00): I set it wrong
Colbertson (2026-07-09 19:38:41+00:00): what did you set wrong? all im seeing is you added a single node here https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14000847188
let me know if you need help or maybe join the latvian zulip chat
https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com/
user_5359 (2026-07-13 10:38:11+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on  https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14000844095. What is the mean of the tag 
Conjunto residencial = Conjunto Ciudadela El Pondaje y Charco Azul
?
Did you know https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aplace%3Dneighbourhood ?
rle32795 (2026-07-18 11:26:27+00:00): Tähän https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1536946906 on itseasiassa tulossa S-market, maastokäynnin perusteella.
JVO (2026-07-18 12:44:40+00:00): s-market ja hepsburger vieterin mukaan: https://www.uutis-jousi.fi/paikalliset/9570777

korjataan
JanezPavelZebovec (2026-07-09 19:19:18+00:00): These edits do not meet OSM mapping standards and constitute obvious vandalism. They include one or more of these: incorrect street names, incorrect road classifications, and other intentionally disruptive edits. They are therefore being reverted.
JanezPavelZebovec (2026-07-09 19:22:48+00:00): These edits do not meet OSM mapping standards and constitute obvious vandalism. They include one or more of these: incorrect street names, incorrect road classifications, and other intentionally disruptive edits. They are therefore being reverted.
pkoby (2026-07-28 14:10:24+00:00): Hey, I saw you used "mtb:feature:wall_ride" on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1536955572. I'm the author of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:MTB_Trail_Features. Just wanted to point out that instead of using a * as the value, the proposal suggests 'yes', or the more detailed 'left', 'right', or 'middle' for position on the trail.
ultimap (2026-07-28 14:23:40+00:00): Hey !

Thanks for the proposal I think it can be used to produce great tools in the future.

However in the wiki page I don't see any explanation for that, can you detail this in the proposal ?

Anyway, I updated the value

Regards
pkoby (2026-07-28 14:26:04+00:00): Yep, because we noticed this usage, I'm working on clarifying the values. Thanks!
habi (2026-07-10 13:19:52+00:00): Ciao carrerPablet
You've moved node  6150405022 quite a bit here: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=185432010 which seems not sensible.
What's your idea here?
Do you want to add the Bethlehem Säge relation to the tram line Westside->Bahnhof?
Greetings from Liebefeld,
habi
habi (2026-07-10 13:29:24+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185475777
habi (2026-07-10 13:33:56+00:00): I think I've "fixed" the relation with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185475978 by using https://relatify.monicz.dev/
habi (2026-07-10 07:54:34+00:00): So, if https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/534858782 is "only" the reception (according to https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5385501) I would not map it as tourism=museum, but at most as https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dreception_desk, no?
Greetings from Bern,
habi
user_5359 (2026-07-13 10:35:12+00:00): Hello! What is the mean of the tag istrito = Sullana?
schobbish (2026-07-11 05:34:45+00:00): Hi ETDT and welcome to OSM! Thank you for your edits. On OSM we usually expand abbreviations in street names, for example "S Moore Rd" should be "South Moore Road" (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Abbreviations). I've done this for you for both of your edits so just keep this in mind for the future.
A67-A67 (2026-07-10 07:38:41+00:00): Op de satellietfoto van 1 juli 2026 is het fietspad nog niet af. Is deze wijziging gebasseerd op de foutieve opmerking of op survey?
eggie (2026-07-09 20:54:51+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-07-09 20:26:12+00:00): This huge bounding box size was completely by accident; this was meant to be two separate changesets. Sorry!

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185433838
Fraxi (2026-07-09 20:26:04+00:00): Сигурно има бордюр откъм паркинга или някакви колчета, но дотам не стигнах.
Eatmoreokra (2026-07-09 20:36:27+00:00): I am adding my driveway because too many drivers think my neighbor’s driveway is mine.  My own Tesla gets confused.   If I did a terrible job adding this, I apologize.  Thanks for any feedback.
schobbish (2026-07-11 05:23:21+00:00): Hi Eatmoreokra and welcome to OSM! It looks like you started to add your driveway but never actually drew the path, at least that's all that got uploaded. I encourage you to try again but I can do it for you if you want.
felipeeugenio (2026-07-10 11:53:13+00:00): No parece ser dubterránea la calle.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185435912
felipeeugenio (2026-07-10 11:52:27+00:00): Hola. Por favor no usar nombres descriptivos. 
Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185436273
salgo60 (2026-07-10 06:32:37+00:00): Inget ref:stockholmarchipelagotrail ?

Finns ett till vindskydd uppsatt av SAT vid Hälsokällan som saknas på SAT kartan https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1537100141
eggie (2026-07-10 09:40:16+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
confusedbuffalo (2026-07-12 04:48:14+00:00): Hi, thanks for doing this, I see you added lots of neat house outlines for the terraced houses. However, I think it should be building=house, house=terraced for individual houses and building=terrace for a whole (unsplit) row. I've changed them here
philipcullen (2026-07-12 10:48:01+00:00): You're right. Thanks for spotting that and fixing them. I really must write a JOSM validator to spot these.
confusedbuffalo (2026-07-12 11:16:35+00:00): A validator would definitely be a good idea!
Fraxi (2026-07-09 21:40:39+00:00): Само че никоя от околните улици не се казва така :D
Dimitar155 (2026-07-09 22:15:14+00:00): 700 метра разлика. Close enough  :)
BCNorwich (2026-07-10 05:34:04+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Lots of highways were dragged out of alignment here, which could have disrupted routing if left. Lots of warnings were given, listed above; the serious ones should have been rectified before uploading.

I think I've corrected everything, but please check that you've not inadvertently moved features (especially highways) before uploading.

Regards Bernard.
Robin53 (2026-07-10 07:16:10+00:00): Dear Bernard,   many apologies for this.  Not an excuse but I was updating on a tablet and the navigation on the screen was a bit of a challenge and I should have reverted to my PC.   Many thanks for the message and will take more care with any future changes.  Best wishes
tian2992 (2026-07-18 22:47:09+00:00): Gracias por tu contribución, es valioso poner una descripción de lo hecho.
DodoGTA (2026-07-10 12:10:03+00:00): This bridge seems to be temporary though: https://www.klaipeda.lt/lt/naujienos/naujienos/7655/klaipeda-ruosiasi-italu-dienoms-montuojamas-atnaujintas-bendrystes-tiltas:7264 (so you might want to add extra tags for that)
silversurfer83 (2026-07-10 13:42:12+00:00): Hi there :)

the surface tag for the Kindergarten playground seems wrong since aerial suggest sand is not the largest part.

Also: The name of the Freibad playground sounds extremely descriptive and I wouldn't add it without picture proof that the name is signed somewhere.

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185439519
Mapikids (2026-07-10 13:57:30+00:00): I think the user specified the type of ground where the play structures are anchored, rather than the area as a whole.

https://mapikids.app/playground/germany/51373-leverkusen/osmw-508764351
Libya-truth (2026-07-10 13:02:57+00:00): Your edit has been reverted. You removed the indigenous Amazigh (Tifinagh) name and name:ber tag from Bani Walid (بني وليد).

The Amazigh name ⴰⵜ ⵡⵍⵉⴷ is the original indigenous name of this city. Removing it suppresses Libya's native language.

Peter Maris was blocked for 1 year by the DWG for this exact behavior. All removals have been restored.
Libya-truth (2026-07-10 13:02:54+00:00): Your edits have been reverted. You removed indigenous Amazigh (Tifinagh) names and name:ber tags from 4 places — Nasmah, Tininai, Eshmekh, and Tarhuna.

These name:ber tags represent the indigenous Amazigh language of Libya, spoken by millions of Libyan citizens. Removing them without any prior discussion violates OSM editing norms.

Peter Maris was blocked for 1 year by the DWG for the same behavior. All removals have been restored.
Libya-truth (2026-07-10 13:02:50+00:00): Your edits have been reverted. You removed indigenous Amazigh (Tifinagh) names and name:ber tags from 5 elements in Tripoli — including Tripoli itself, Abu Salim, Ain Zara, Qasr Bin Ghashir, and Martyrs' Square.

You also changed the English name of Martyrs' Square (ميدان الشهداء) to "Green Square" — the name used under the former regime, which has been officially renamed since 2011.

These Tifinagh names represent Libya's indigenous Amazigh language. Removing them without discussion is considered suppression of minority language representation by the OSM Data Working Group.

Peter Maris was blocked for 1 year by the DWG (Ticket#2026071010000268) for doing the exact same thing you are doing — mass removal of name:ber tags from Libyan places.

All your removals have been restored. If you continue this behavior, you will be reported to the DWG.
Libya-truth (2026-07-10 13:03:00+00:00): Your edit has been reverted. You removed the indigenous Amazigh (Tifinagh) name and name:ber tag from the Old City of Tripoli (مدينة طرابلس القديمة).

The Amazigh name ⵟⵔⴰⴱⵍⵙ ⵍⵇⴷⵉⵎⴰ represents the indigenous language of this historic city. Removing it without discussion is suppression of minority language representation.

Peter Maris was blocked for 1 year by the DWG for the same behavior. All removals have been restored.
Libya-truth (2026-07-10 13:23:49+00:00): Your removals of Amazigh names in this changeset have been reverted. You removed indigenous Tifinagh names and deleted name:ber tags from Al lansha, Hey al-Andalus, Bab Gorji, and Bab Akara.

A direct question: why are you deleting name:ber tags? These are correctly-tagged minority language names. Deleting them removes the Amazigh language of Libya's indigenous people from the map entirely. If you have a genuine argument, state it here or on the community forum — mass deletion without discussion is not how OSM works.

Peter Maris was blocked for 1 year by the DWG (Ticket#2026071010000268) for exactly this. A report about your edits has been filed with the DWG as well.
Libya-truth (2026-07-10 13:23:45+00:00): Your removal has been reverted. Here you removed the indigenous Amazigh (Tifinagh) name and deleted the name:ber tag from Al Marduom (المردوم).

A direct question: why delete the name:ber tag? Even if you disagree about the main name format, deleting the language tag itself erases the Amazigh language from the map — there is no data-quality justification for that.

Peter Maris was blocked for 1 year by the DWG for the same behavior. A report about your edits has been filed with the DWG.
VLD0251 (2026-07-10 12:33:31+00:00): Hi ABDULLAH AL WERFALLI, 
Please avoid reverting changes without prior discussion. on OpenStreetMap, mapping decisions are made by consensus with local contributors. please discuss with the original mapper or the Libyan community before making further reverts.

Happy mapping!
Libya-truth (2026-07-10 13:23:41+00:00): Your removals have been reverted. In this changeset you removed indigenous Amazigh (Tifinagh) names and deleted name:ber tags from Rryayna and Lasba'a — and on Arrabita al Gharbia (node/1565511513) you deleted the name tag ENTIRELY, leaving the town with no name at all on the map. That is not an update; that is data destruction.

A direct question: why are you deleting name:ber tags? If your concern were only the format of the main name tag, you could edit that and leave the language tags intact, as OSM multilingual tagging guidelines expect. Deleting name:ber removes the Amazigh language itself from the map. What is your justification?

Tifinagh is the script of Libya's indigenous Amazigh people, recognized in the 2011 Constitutional Declaration. Peter Maris was blocked for 1 year by the DWG (Ticket#2026071010000268) for exactly this behavior. A report about your edits has been filed with the DWG as well.
pitscheplatsch (2026-07-10 13:45:58+00:00): Hi @ABDULLAH%20AL%20WERFALLI ,  @ VLD0251 and @Libya-truth,

this is increasingly developing into the edit-war situation I warned about in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185402240#c1623516.

Repeated removals and reverts, together with references to users, blocks, and DWG reports, are shifting attention away from the actual data. A block or investigation is not proof that these specific edits are correct or incorrect.

Please pause further changes to the disputed tags and discuss the sources, language codes, and use of name=* in one central place. This is a request to de-escalate, not a judgment on the validity of the added names.

Thanks!

Best regards, Pascal
pitscheplatsch (2026-07-10 13:51:46+00:00): And again, @Libya-truth please see my comment @ https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185473901#c1623939