piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Gregory Peony (2025-09-13 18:00:55+00:00): Hi, every footprints you added here represents a building in the imagery but they could be more accurate and should have been squared. 

When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom in so that you can see the outline of the building and mark the corners carefully. Exclude shadows and yards when tracing the footprint. Keep in mind that you are looking at the [roofs of buildings](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape#Roof_shape), but mapping their footprints. Depending on how the scene is lit, pitched roofs may have light and dark sections that belong to one building. Generally pitched roofs overhang the walls of a building, so a footprint slightly smaller than the roof is accurate. You can scale selected features in ID with shift+(-/+), or JOSM with ctrl.+alt+Lclick & drag.  Take care to make contributions that others can build upon.

After tracing and tagging features which are likely square or round, please remember to square their corners (q), or circularise them (o), because it is almost impossible and time consuming to draw shapes so percisely by hand. Buildings with metal or pitched roofs tend to have square corners; round buildings are identifiable by the distinctive cresent shaped shadow they cast. Unless the building is clearly a different shape then it's best to assume that it should be rounded or its corners should be squared. In the iD Editor, you can right click for access to editing functions. Since roofs tend to overhang walls trace the initial shape slightly smaller to allow a buffer for any change in size that may occur. In JOSM use the [buildingstools plugin](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/BuildingsTools). In ID you must draw the shape accurately enough else shapes will not completely square. This [video about squaring features in ID](https://youtu.be/Xs5wX592E1o) has more information and a demo.

Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
wildmaps (2025-10-05 20:10:33+00:00): Hi @user_2539,
I noticed that you merged the PEC email with the regular email address. I disagree with this edit because in Italy a PEC address is a special certified mailbox, and it is not possible to send a normal email to a PEC address. For this reason, there is a dedicated tag: contact:pec=*.
user_5359 (2025-10-06 04:44:26+00:00): That is indeed my mistake. I'm sorry, but after 25 days I can no longer remember what caused the change. Probably the same reason why you created the name user_2539 from my name user_5359. :)
wildmaps (2025-10-06 09:27:06+00:00): Ok, no problem. Sorry for writing your username wrong!
aharvey (2025-09-11 03:08:46+00:00): you can add service=driveway to specify the type of service road and also driveway=pipestem to mark it as a shared driveway.
Prasanna Msamy (2025-10-15 17:14:10+00:00): Thank you for the valuable feedback. I have reverted the edit . I look forward to your suggestion/feedback in the future as well. 
Thank you
Prasanna Msamy (2025-10-17 14:50:54+00:00): Thank you for the valuable feedback. I have updated service and driveway tags . I look forward to your suggestion/feedback in the future as well.
Thank you
Gregory Peony (2025-09-10 19:27:02+00:00): Good job modifying features beyond the scope of the project; when you decide to do this please add custom text stating what you did and why to your changeset comment (when saving). This is useful to other contributors. You correctly alligned highways to the imagery and added highways. The highways you mapped should be tagged as paths becasue they appear too narrow for a car to use and there is no evidence of a car having driven on them. Appropriate modifiecation of residential area to avoid overlaps with footpritns. All footprints valid; just remember to exclude the shadow a building casts from its footprint. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171751299
Wilfried Jansky (2025-09-11 21:12:34+00:00): Thank you very much for your feedback. I will keep in mind to write a description about added highways and track them as paths. There have been mapped some paths, but these were rather narrow and jagged. I wanted to correct them, to link them with broader paths or existing streets, and then I added some new ones.
This happened attending yesterday’s Mapathon organized by MSF via our student’s union www.kongeos.xyz. I’m a Geodesy student from Vienna, Austria. Within the last years I attended around 5 MSF mapathons with each about 2 hrs effective mapping time.
Gregory Peony (2025-09-14 00:49:28+00:00): You're welcome! Thank you for your resopnse and contributions. Mapping the geometry of highways can be where a lot of the effort of mapping them lies. Generally the geometry of the highways you added was good so I could just retag them as I have here https://osmcha.org/changesets/171897397

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa for tagging highways in Africa and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments for use of changeset comments.

You can use the shortcut ctrl+shift+m to open the measurement panel in ID and measure the width of a highway by drawing a temporary line perpendicular to it. Anything <1.8 m is most likely a path.

It's great that you're contributing as part of mapathons. I encourage all contributors to attend mapathons if they can, and there were also people contributing to the project at the same time as your mapathon while I was doing live validation and providing feedback, so I
Wilfried Jansky (2025-09-14 17:39:09+00:00): Thank you for the eye-opening links. From now on I will write expressive descriptions.
Negreheb (2025-09-11 08:12:27+00:00): Hier ist euch das ebenfalls passiert. Zur erklärung: Hier ist das Gebäude mit den Werten versehen, das soll natürlich auch weiterhin als Gebäude sichtbar sein auf der Karte. Bei eurem ersten Changeset habt ihr wirklich nur einen Punkt editiert, der auf einem Gebäude drauf war, der hat dann wirklich keinen building-tag. 

Fügt ihr den fehlenden Tag selbst wieder dazu? Da ich annehme, dass ihr als Firma agiert, wäre es toll, wenn zumindest ein paar Infos auf dem Profil zu finden sind. 
Die Foundation selbst möchte mehr Informationen haben https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

Lg Stefan
Private Chalets (2025-09-11 09:25:05+00:00): Hallo Stefan,
Danke für Info und Hilfe. 
Ja also ich füge wieder hinzu: Gebäude=Haus
richtig?
Lg Hubertus
Private Chalets (2025-09-11 09:28:18+00:00): Ja ich vermiete Haus mit meiner Firma, werde gerne Informationen in Profil schreiben.
Danke
Negreheb (2025-09-11 10:11:14+00:00): Ja, sieht gut aus, die Häuser sind jetzt auch wieder auf der Karte bei osm.org sichtbar. Danke dir! 
Alles gute!
Private Chalets (2025-09-11 10:18:29+00:00): Super danke.
Noch eine Frage:
Bei einem Haus (ApartHotel) vermieten wir zwei getrennte Einheiten mit unterschiedlichen Namen. Kann ich einfach zwei Hotels auf ein Haus/ eine Adresse machen?
Lg danke Hubertus
Gregory Peony (2025-09-13 17:57:52+00:00): Hi, the NE footprint envelopes multiple buildings. 

Please do not connect the corners of buildings to other buildings or features such as highways or residential areas. In the iD Editor, hold down the `Alt` key to prevent your cursor from snapping to existing data and accidentally creating shared(grey) nodes. This [video about connected nodes](https://youtu.be/ltn1VOiq5_0) has more information and a guide.

Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171751393
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2025-09-13 22:39:00+00:00): شكرا جزيلاً لك على جهودك الطيبة
Gregory Peony (2025-09-13 17:53:41+00:00): Hi Anya,

Assuming you were asking if the western most footprint here represents a building my answer is that, yes, it does, and I think that all the footprints you added here represent buildings. It is obscured by vegetation, but there is evidence to support mapping it as a building. I do not know the exact building you are refering to based on your description; you can add fix me tags with custom values to features to make them stand out https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:fixme. The best way to point to a specific feature is to provide a link to its history (via the bottom right panel after selecting a feature in OSMCha) like this one. https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1428825813 The best way to ensure you recieve feedback regarding your contributions is to make a note of such links and your questions, then ask someone about them during a mapathon.

Sometimes features are obscured by others in imagery e.g. tall buildings, vegetation, shadows, or clouds. Sometimes using another imagery source in these instances can allow you to view the feature of interest directly. Our goal is to map the ground truth accurately, so if the feature is obscured in all available sources, then use what you can see (and other map data) to estimate its shape, size, position and orientation. Think about what space is already occupied by other features e.g. Consider where a tree's trunk meets the ground.

I hope this answers your question. Thanks for your contribution.
ceirios (2025-09-12 19:17:59+00:00): Hi there,

What's your source for this please? I live here and I've never heard it being referred to in English.
DankJae (2025-09-12 19:52:04+00:00): Be free to drop the name "Gorsedd Stones" here if so. The editor changed all of them in Wales, despite my local one using the English name, and assumed the same here. Apologies.
DankJae (2025-09-13 15:09:42+00:00): amended [https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171880332]
LordGarySugar (2025-10-10 02:11:02+00:00): Hi, why have you mass-removed addr:city=Gillingham from lots of houses, and added addr:city=Gillingham to others?
jajanja3 (2025-10-10 06:27:43+00:00): Gillingham is not a city, its classed as a town, but theres no option for the ID editor drop box, unless you add it manually as addr:town, so its a very tedious thing to do to make it accurate. Im not entirely sure if there is an easier way to do this; because since Gillingham is classed as a town, shouldnt the addr:town tag be automatically placed when creating a new item, or is that not how it works?
LordGarySugar (2025-10-10 10:45:57+00:00): So unfortunately if you look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:city , it should be used for towns too. In the UK addr:city usually uses the 'post town', which Gillingham is. So a village next to Gillingham would still use addr:city=Gillingham.
Gregory Peony (2025-09-10 19:31:28+00:00): All footprints you mapped here represent buildings in imagery. The Western group of buildings is generally more accurate than the Eastern group which is oversized. 

When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom in so that you can see the outline of the building and mark the corners carefully. Exclude shadows and yards when tracing the footprint. Keep in mind that you are looking at the [roofs of buildings](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape#Roof_shape), but mapping their footprints. Depending on how the scene is lit, pitched roofs may have light and dark sections that belong to one building. Generally pitched roofs overhang the walls of a building, so a footprint slightly smaller than the roof is accurate. You can scale selected features in ID with shift+(-/+), or JOSM with ctrl.+alt+Lclick & drag.  Take care to make contributions that others can build upon.

Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
osmviborg (2025-09-11 05:37:29+00:00): Hvorfor bliver du ved med at tegne ikke eksisterende stier?
mewhenthe (2025-09-13 21:54:32+00:00): Hi, I have reverted this changeset for the following reasons:

1. The renaming was only done for the alternative name, in which the renaming is partially complete, but causes discrepancies.
2. Name of the road was correctly labeled according to addresses. (src: https://geohub.wilcotx.gov/datasets/WILCO::county-web-address-public/explore?location=30.631903%2C-97.689912%2C17.93)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171895000
jake_penguins (2025-09-15 00:01:16+00:00): Cycle lanes that are part of the road should be mapped using the cycleway=lane tag, not mapped as separate cycleways disconnected from the road. Additionally, shared use paths should replace any existing sidewalks/footways, not be mapped separate from them.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway
Gregory Peony (2025-09-13 18:09:04+00:00): Hi, all footprints you mapped here represent buildings in the imagery. They could be more accurate if you genearally mapped them smaller because pitched roofs tend to overhang building walls. 

When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom in so that you can see the outline of the building and mark the corners carefully. Exclude shadows and yards when tracing the footprint. Keep in mind that you are looking at the [roofs of buildings](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape#Roof_shape), but mapping their footprints. Depending on how the scene is lit, pitched roofs may have light and dark sections that belong to one building. Generally pitched roofs overhang the walls of a building, so a footprint slightly smaller than the roof is accurate. You can scale selected features in ID with shift+(-/+), or JOSM with ctrl.+alt+Lclick & drag.  Take care to make contributions that others can build upon.

Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
buy_osmand (2025-09-11 02:33:10+00:00): test comment. 👋😆
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171753345
Hightide10 (2025-09-10 21:55:05+00:00): Hello, I came across your edits in the Correntina, Brazil area. 

I noticed that you removed some roads such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/376999447 and replaced it with new roads https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1426903583, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1425373102 which now have different road names. I was wondering what your source was for these new road names? The OSM Wiki has an article on the importance of history retention which highlights preserving the feature itself and only updating it’s tags. This way, other mappers can see how a feature has changed over time. You can find the article here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history#:~:text=Similarly%2C%20make%20sure%20to%20preserve%20the%20identity%20of%20an%20element%20even%20when%20its%20tags%20become%20different.

I also saw that the name tags added to these roads that look like address data:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1428329570
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1428357008
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1428357007

Would this be better as a separate tag instead of as a name tag, such as Addresses or description tagging described here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description. Maybe this data should be on address features instead of highway features? The address data may be private information. 

There are also some areas with disconnected and floating highway data:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13128918588
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2995690935
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13128852317
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3353795581

I look forward to hearing from you.
brassica (2025-09-18 18:11:51+00:00): Openingstijden Lombok Apotheek

Mo-Fr 08:00-12:30, 13:30-18:00; Sa 11:00-15:00

https://www.lombokapotheek.nl/
matheusgomesms (2025-09-14 10:30:58+00:00): Oi João, tudo bem?

Primeiramente, bem-vindo ao OSM! Temos uma comunidade brasileira muito ativa, e estamos felizes com que a Prefeitura de Correntina esteja melhorando o mapa diretamente!

A gente viu algumas coisinhas que podem ser melhoradas nas suas edições, e queríamos te propor de conversarmos melhor. Quem sabe podemos nos voluntariar para dar um treinamento a você(s)?

Fico no aguardo de sua resposta!

Abs,
Matheus
Gazer75 (2026-04-19 01:09:14+00:00): Bipolar HVDC is one circuit, not two...
mcliquid (2025-09-14 16:28:09+00:00): Hi and thank you for your contribution!

Please note for the future: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
PèreForez (2026-01-30 20:58:08+00:00): En dehors de ce problème d'aire géographique pour lequel je ne saurai donner de solution (peut-être s'agit-il de la création d'une relation entre deux noms homonymes en France et quelque part en Australie, nouvelle-Guinée ou Nouvelle-Calédonie ?) je me permets de te signaler une petite erreur de frappe dans le noeud 11034491926 avec le n° de référence MémorialGenWeb (6367 au lieu de 56367) qui entraîne des valeurs erronées pour les valeurs Wikidata ...
Bonne correction
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2025-09-12 05:12:57+00:00): You added a traffic sign. And you wrote "football field" in your changeset comment. Please write real comments.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
literan (2025-09-11 20:18:48+00:00): одноэтажные пристройки к многоэтажам это  building:part, а не отдельные здания.. Я одно здание тут переделал, хорошо бы, если у вас тоже получилось научиться
Negreheb (2025-09-11 07:58:12+00:00): Servus rlaun, habs nur gerade zufällig gesehen, bitte das nächste mal https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix nutzen und nicht einfach löschen. Hintergrund ist, dass die Gebäude auf den Luftbildern noch zu sehen sind, nicht, dass am Ende noch jemand herkommt und die einfach wieder einzeichnet :D 
Alles gute!
yawp (2025-09-12 17:00:28+00:00): Hallo Neghreheb,
Danke für den Hinweis! Ist schon lange her dass ich etwas bearbeitet habe, muss mich erst wieder einlesen. LG!
felipeeugenio (2025-09-11 14:51:35+00:00): Hola. Muchas gracias por sus ediciones.
Si bien se entiende perfecto lo que intenta hacer agregando nodos con direcciones para corregir el nombre de las calles, no es una buena práctica el estar editando incorrectamente para que otros maperos corrijan lo que hace.
Cuando vea este tipo de situaciones quizás es mejor que deje una nota (https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/new#map=16/-35.84203/-71.59342&layers=N) en la página, de ese modo el mapero que la revisa puede resolverla.

Saludos y muchas gracias
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171755072
mike140 (2025-12-24 20:40:35+00:00): Всі ваші правки були скасовані як вандальні. Не треба видаляти old_name, name:uk, name:en та інші. Не треба змінювати назви по типу: Італійська вулиця → вулиця Італійська. Ознайомтесь з правилами іменування в Україні: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B8 та приєднуйтесь до української osm-спільноти в телеграм: https://t.me/osmUA
spiregrain (2025-09-11 07:39:28+00:00): Good morning!  In this changeset, you deleted three stop area relations - why was that?   relation/7673063  relation/7772681 relation/9736740

You also renamed some items, back to "West Ham" from the more detailled names that local mappers had applied.  Is that what you meant to do, and why?
小智智 (2025-09-11 10:36:55+00:00): It was intended. West Ham (the rail station) is now clearly one station (the entrance and concourse are shared so no part of the station can work independently without using that entrance and concourse) so there should be only one stop area for that station, and the name is just "West Ham".
spiregrain (2025-09-11 10:54:15+00:00): I understand your point.  I might reach out to previous editors on this one, I suspect that they may have created the separate stop areas to cover some detail of ticketting or responsibility between LU / DLR and C2C.   But thank you for your response and explaining your (reasonable!) logic!
小智智 (2025-09-11 10:58:42+00:00): I also did the same to some other stations, such as Tottenham Court Road, a while ago. 

Those I left separate are those where there is a clear boundary on the ground between areas of responsibility, where the parts can be operated separately, like Liverpool Street.
epxmap (2026-04-26 14:45:05+00:00): lol, looks like some road sign company owner lives in that house and made sure there had to be signs on a crumbling Soviet-era sidewalk :D
HellMap (2026-04-26 15:01:52+00:00): I don't disagree that this is a stupid place for these signs. And the actual intent here is that cars shouldn't enter these footways. But regardless they are still traffic signs and legally binding and that's what OSM follows for tagging. Technically, anyone can get traffic signs installed if they can get municipality/council approval. I have no idea if these have been approved - one would have to contact municipality building authority department.
epxmap (2026-04-26 15:05:04+00:00): got it, thanks
citrula (2025-09-10 23:19:30+00:00): On OSM, we use the fully expanded suffix for street names ("Berry Branch Ln" should be "Berry Branch Lane", for example)

Let me know if you need help fixing this!
vicente lopez 2021 (2025-09-11 01:36:34+00:00): me ahyudaria con la duplicacion de calzada del camino banclari entre el acceso anordelta  y el camino el claro
muralito (2025-09-11 03:24:46+00:00): claro, pero no hay foto aerea actual que la muestre, ¿o si?
tux67 (2025-09-11 06:43:18+00:00): Hallo hangy,

irgendeine Idee was deine Änderung mit der Einzelbild Anzeige der historic.place map macht, wenn man nur auf eine Commons Kategorie verlinkt? 
https://gk.historic.place/historische_objekte/l/de/index.html?zoom=17&lat=51.08612&lon=6.41334&pid=HaHbHcSaHfHe
Ich verstehe deinen Ansatz, aber lt. Wiki ist das image tag mit einer voll qualifizierten URL nicht falsch. 
Also m.E. kein genereller Grund zur Löschung oder bei vorhandenem commons Tag auch keine Qualitätsverbesserung (abgesehen vielleicht von der Vermeidung von Redundanz).

Gruß 
tux67
P.S.: und - nein - ein gültiges Tag zu verwenden würde ich noch nicht als mapping für den Renderer sehen ;-) - vielleicht können die historic.place Kollegen ja auch mit Commons Kategorien umgehen (allerdings sind deren Daten updates immer mit etwas delay)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171756636