piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Margriko (2023-04-21 11:54:48+00:00): Tvora beveik visur eina, pranyksta tik artejant sankryzoms. Aisku, prie ziedo galiu sulieti i 1 kelia, be problemu. Zonas taip pat galiu pataisyti. Beje valstybiniame eismoinfo.lt irgi 2 vektoriai. Siaip vaziavau siuo keliu pries menesi, OsmAnd rode neteisingus apsisukimus, posukius, kur fiziskai to daryti nebuvo galima.
Na bet jei netinka galit revertinti pakeitimus, jei cia tai imanoma, nenoriu niekam sudaryti problemu.
Tomas Straupis (2023-04-21 12:08:25+00:00): Gal tiesiog ateity siūlyčiau nepulti dėti mikrodetalių, nes jos paprastai neturi naudos, o tik padaro viską beprasmiškai sudėtingiau: daugėja darbo ir mažėja ratas žmonių, kurie gali daryti pakeitimus nepriveldami klaidų :-(
mueschel (2023-04-27 10:12:57+00:00): Please check your tags for validity before uploading. I find misspellings of simple tags like 'motor_vehicle' by Grab employees every week.
Cosmin_Matifalean (2023-05-08 12:26:51+00:00): Hello Mueschel, i want to thank you for noticing and correcting the spelling mistakes of the motor_vehicle tag. I will doublecheck this kind of tags from now on to ensure validity
eggie (2023-04-21 09:12:28+00:00): Dag golgminer  Svp geen wegen knippen met editor iD.
De routerelaties gaan dan stuk.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-04-21 09:14:52+00:00): reverted by changeset #135184618
Leo Slager (2023-04-23 14:19:28+00:00): routerelaties bus 608 zijn weer up to date.
jonorossi (2023-04-23 02:54:10+00:00): You've incorrectly added a house number tag to Pitt Street, i.e. the whole street.
jonorossi (2023-04-23 03:12:44+00:00): Just a heads up, you usually don't need to fill out suburb, postcode, state and country for every map feature. OpenStreetMap tools will derive these from suburb, state and country boundaries.

If you want to check how address resolution looks based on the entered data Nominatim can do this. For example, I've linked to the node for a house on Rocky Passage Road that only has a housenumber and street tag, but resolve the full address:

https://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/ui/details.html?osmtype=N&osmid=10258968942
NieWnen (2023-04-22 08:52:17+00:00): Cześć,
dzięki za 1 zmianę w OSM. Ta relacja zakazu skrętu w lewo wygląda sensownie, natomiast nakaz jazdy prosto usunąłem. Zamiast tego pętla dostała odpowiednie accessy, które uprawniają do jazdy tam tylko dla transportu publicznego.

Jeszcze jedno drobna uwaga: nie ma sensu dzielić odcinków dróg jeśli nic się zmieni nie robi (Sójki i ta serwisowa).
Frans S (2023-05-11 14:40:06+00:00): Hello Toon. Thanks for mapping.
A remark. Please do not connect nodes of a building to power lines when they cross a building. Press the Ctr key when you map a building in that situation. The node will not connect.
Best regards
eggie (2023-04-21 09:38:26+00:00): Beste golfminer.. Neem eerst even contact met me op voordat je verder mapt.
Je vernielt de OV routes.. Dit moet echt op een andere manier.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-04-21 09:38:50+00:00): reverted by changeset #135185447
Leo Slager (2023-04-23 14:20:16+00:00): routerelaties bus 609 en 610 zijn weer up to date.
eggie (2023-04-23 14:23:23+00:00): Thanks Leo..  
Groet eggie
NieWnen (2023-04-22 08:54:33+00:00): Dlaczego tramwaj został zmieniony na otwarty? To nie jest poprawne i jest uznawane jako wandalizm.

Wycofałem (135220114).
rskedgell (2023-04-21 14:34:11+00:00): Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for adding your business to the map.

I've moved the address and contact details from the description to the appropriate OSM tags and added the tag shop=travel_agency. This helps map users and data consumers find you.
Supaplex030 (2023-04-21 12:44:47+00:00): Done :)
user_18208051 (2023-04-21 14:09:50+00:00): thanks
eggie (2023-04-21 09:56:18+00:00): Dag Marcel...  Volgens mij gaat het allemaal correct met die winkels.
Zo'n trottoir nemen we vaak op in de tagging van de rijbaan ernaast. In dit geval het fietspad met sidewalk=right
Dat is hier dus al door een andere mapper toegevoegd.
De standaard kaart laat dit echter niet zien, maar het trottoir staat er dus al op.
He mag zo wel, maar de routering loopt dan vaak spaak als je geen zijverbindingen maakt. 
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=135185618
MVG
eggie
borishag (2023-04-24 08:05:38+00:00): Kruidvat;
Hallo Marcel,
Deze winkel is volgens onze vestigingsgegevens alleen op nummer 74 gevestigd. zou je derhalve nummer 74b weer uit deze BAG node kunnen verwijderen?
borishag, Editor AS Watson Stores.
Marcel Lambrechts (2023-04-24 08:57:36+00:00): Hallo borishag, ik kan me niet herinneren dat ik daar bewust een 74b heb toegevoegd (misschien gebeurt tijdens samenvoegen nodes) maar zal het verwijderen.
Gd,
Marcel
borishag (2023-04-24 09:10:55+00:00): Hallo Marcel,

74b is een BAG node, deze kan je niet weggooien maar moet je herstellen
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/?searchQuery=gildenburg%2074b&objectId=0513200000008763&theme=BRT%20Achtergrond&geometry.x=108119.04149999999&geometry.y=449527.3445&zoomlevel=14.122282296992013
Marcel Lambrechts (2023-04-24 09:16:40+00:00): Thanks, is een handige link ga ik gelijk bookmarken. Als ik weer in de gelegenheid ben zal ik de aanpassing(en) herstellen.
4004 (2023-04-23 21:29:19+00:00): здравствуйте, спасибо за правку.
вроде по описанию эта улица должна была быть у Макаенка?
eggie (2023-04-21 10:15:27+00:00): Dag Marius.. Helemaal correct zo.. :)
MVG
eggie
user_5359 (2023-04-21 12:26:20+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I revert your SEO SPAM (mostly foreign keys)
user_5359 (2023-04-21 12:25:11+00:00): Welcoem to OSM! I revert your SEO SPAM (mostly foreign keys)
Dodko (2023-04-21 18:45:40+00:00): Adresa je už v budove https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/971722544 netreba ju dávať duplicitne aj na POI.
Telefónne číslo sa zapisuje v medzinárodnom formáte +421
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Key:phone
Dado David (2023-04-21 19:07:02+00:00): Predtým som to vo vyhľadávaní nenašiel, čo je zaujímavé. Preto som to pridal.
Dodko (2023-04-21 19:11:41+00:00): Pridanie obchodu je v poriadku, len sa mu nevyplňuje adresa, keďže tá existuje na budove. Odtiaľ si ju aplikácie preberú.
Dado David (2023-04-21 19:14:20+00:00): Samozrejme. Už je to opravené. Ďakujem za info.
eggie (2023-04-21 11:36:31+00:00): Dag ba_..
Het is correct..
Mocht het ook voor brommers gelden dan toevoegen
.. oneway:moped=no
.. oneway:mofa=no

Mvg
eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-22 13:10:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135226108 where the changeset comment is: See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7076 and links from there
aceman444 (2024-09-14 13:00:50+00:00): Hi, what is the exact traffic sign here? There is a gate blocking these roads so access=destination seems weird. Anyone who decides he has destination there can go there? You also marked the main street crossing the area but there are many other streets where this restriction would apply (as they are behind the gates).
Bolt028 (2024-09-16 06:46:07+00:00): Hi 
access= destination prohibits routing through this road (If I am not mistaken it is only for residents of that road) in some cases gates are not considered when routing so this makes it that residents who have their destination can be routed to the area. Do you perhaps have another tag that can be used for this?
aceman444 (2024-09-29 11:57:09+00:00): Never tag for broken navigation apps! If they ignore gates, they are buggy, report the error to the authors. access=destination does prohibit routing through the road, but it will not prohibit routing to the road, if anyone (even non-resident) decides to place his destination on that road. So if it is behind a gate and the road is only for residents, then that is a clear access=private.
Bolt028 (2024-09-30 13:53:08+00:00): Thanks for the feedback. I have removed the tag.
aceman444 (2024-10-02 21:05:48+00:00): OK, but you still left it on the Strážna street. Anyway, I have added the access=private to all the streets inside the area blocked by the gates.
It is unclear if non-resident pedestrians can go there so until then better block it for all traffic except residents. Thanks for the information.
user_6110846 (2023-04-21 13:03:00+00:00): https://ps.informator.ua/2022/12/23/u-pereyaslavskij-gromadi-perejmenuvaly-majzhe-sotnyu-vulycz-ta-provulkiv-povnyj-perelik/
user_6110846 (2023-04-21 13:31:26+00:00): виправлено картографування районів міста
Nichoman0706 (2023-04-21 10:58:12+00:00): Sources from Google maps stated that the following road is name Jl Perumahan Kambela Permai
seattlefyi (2023-04-24 19:46:42+00:00): Thanks for the help here!
MxxCon (2023-04-25 03:20:57+00:00): Hello.
Wouldn't it be more appropriate to have access=permit rather than access=no?
Also could you please elaborate why did you remove motor_vehicle=yes from some road segments?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135188679
smikhnouski_lyft (2023-04-26 11:35:51+00:00): Hi, MxxxCon!
Thank you for paying attention to this.
The access=no tag was added based on the fact that it is a correctional facility and doesn’t have public access. According to the OSMwiki, access=permit is used if the access is restricted, but everyone can get the access, so it is more like just a procedure. In this case, it is a correctional facility with strict rules, where not everyone is allowed to get access to the territory, besides, it is necessary to observe a number of rules, including the form of clothing, the availability of documents, which also requires time and preparation. Also the tag already exists on the gate and some of the facility’s roads, and for the map’s accuracy the access=no tag would be preferable.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Dpermit
The motor_vehicle=yes tag was deleted for the same reason. According to the Rikers Island Visitor Guide(https://www.libertyfund.nyc/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/2016-Rikers-Island-Visitor-Guide.pdf) and some other sources, to get to the island you need to take a bus and there is no evidence that all motor vehicles are allowed.
We would appreciate hearing your thoughts on this situation and find any potential solutions.

Best regards, Stepan
MxxCon (2023-04-26 14:08:03+00:00): I didn't know that visitors must arrive by bus. I thought private cars could get there somewhere too. This does make sense. However, I'm concerned regarding navigation/routing within the prison (obviously for those that are allowed). Wouldn't routers refuse/ignore any roads with access=no?
smikhnouski_lyft (2023-04-27 11:26:44+00:00): According to the OSMwiki access=no (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access#) tag prohibits general access to the road. “Stronger interdiction than access=private. Examples: a fully closed road; a restricted military facility.” In my opinion, by the level of access to this correctional facility we could equate it with a military base. So, yes, routing will ignore these roads. The only way to indicate that the road isn’t restricted for certain vehicles with the permission is to add the motor_vehicle=private tag, but for the navigation this tag is superior to access=no and the road becomes drivable for everyone. So it will be highlighted on the map but routing won’t be accurate. 
So I can see 2 potential approaches to tag the roads. We may add the motor_vehicle=private tag, but it opens the roads for general access or the second one is to leave everything as it is now, but navigation wouldn’t work on this territory for all drivers. I find the option to leave the roads with access=no more preferable, so nobody could be incorrectly routed to the area. However, we can go with either of them.

I will be happy to know your thoughts and figure out the best approach together!
Stephen Bauman (2025-01-06 15:06:43+00:00): There is a problem because regularly scheduled buses are permitted. I'm analyzing scheduled bus parameters for cities around the world, using their GTFS schedules. One problem is that many do not include the optional shape file, which traces the route. OSM does provide some bus route "shapes". However, they are not updated with transit agency frequency (sometimes daily).

My workaround is to use the stop  geographic locations, which are required, and trace the shortest distance between stops along the roadways. Naturally, I don't include those with "highway": tags like "cyclepaths", "bridlepaths", etc. as possible "ways" to connect. I have been omitting those with the "access":"no" tag.

There is a similar problem within the Brooklyn Navy Yard. A scheduled bus does go through the facility. The workaround has been to include a tag "bus:conditional": "yes @....", in addition to "access":"no". Perhaps, a qualification of this sort might be in order.

Just a thought.
MxxCon (2025-01-06 19:48:55+00:00): Stephen, there's a public transit bus that goes there and it has GTFS feed? I thought this was Rikers Island prison's own bus service type of situation..?🤔
Stephen Bauman (2025-01-06 23:13:39+00:00): Yes, It's the Q100 LTD, run by the MTA Bus Co. Here's a link to the MTA's pdf schedule: https://new.mta.info/document/6661

Here's a link to the GTFS schedule:
https://rrgtfsfeeds.s3.amazonaws.com/gtfs_busco.zip

Here's a link to the MTA's Queens Bus Map that shows the Q100 last stop within Rikers Island
https://new.mta.info/map/5371

Here's an OSM link to the way within Rikers with tags: highway:service and bus:yes

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/185158098

Here's the OSM link to the bridge leading to Rikers
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/11836206

with tags highway:tertiary, access:no

and no qualifier for public bus access.

Thanks for your quick reply.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-04-21 11:20:22+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10829553129

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
m_p_13 (2023-04-21 12:07:38+00:00): Adres nie posiada czegoś takiego jak ulica.
m_p_13 (2023-04-21 12:11:04+00:00): https://aleo.com/pl/firma/robert-sawicki-agrosaw-rog
NorthCrab (2023-04-22 05:22:36+00:00): Okej, podmieniłem addr:city -> addr:place aby było widać że nie ma tam nazwy ulicy. Pozdrawiam!
willkmis (2023-04-21 15:27:00+00:00): Hello,
Please note that the description tag is not to be used for subjective/advertising copy: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description#No_advertising. I will remove it shortly. Also, please note that opening_hours in OpenStreetMap follows strict syntax rules, as was corrected previously.
NieWnen (2024-08-02 20:00:28+00:00): Hej, jesli to miał być ciąg pieszo-rowerowy to poprawiłem tagowanie zgodnie z wiki :)

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Rowery#Drogi_dla_pieszych_i_rower%C3%B3w
MaciekMma (2024-08-02 20:05:48+00:00): W porzadku. Tam o ile kojarze nie ma tych znakow pionowych, ale... moze sie co zmienilo. Ponad rok juz nie bylem w tym miejscu. Wazne, ze navi wytyczy routing dla roweru. Milego.
NieWnen (2024-08-02 20:07:53+00:00): Ah, no to jak nie ma, to nie powinno być jednak tak otagowane :/

To w takim razie zwykłe path tu wystarczy jeśli nie jest to niezgodne z przepisami/nie ma zakazów.
MaciekMma (2024-08-02 20:10:02+00:00): Nie cofaj. Pojade i sprawdze.
NieWnen (2024-08-02 20:14:56+00:00): Zdążyłem to zrobić przed komentarzem :P

Ale to na spokojnie, można poprawić, a teraz routing też będzie działać jak coś.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-22 13:10:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135226108 where the changeset comment is: See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7076 and links from there
user_5359 (2023-04-21 16:32:13+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I remove your SEO SPAM (mostly foreign keys)
emvee (2023-05-29 18:00:16+00:00): But setting on all pedestrian traffic lights does traffic_signals:direction=both not make sense, at least not to me.

Are you saying that a somebody on foot crossing https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/240038771 potentially has to wait here 6 times?
Lokai (2023-07-13 05:20:42+00:00): Hallo,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1164430431#map=19/49.80516/7.79493&layers=D

Hier haben der Weg und die Grenze die gleichen Knoten. Das ist ungünstig bei späteren Änderungen. Die Linien lassen sich trozdem übereinander legen auch ohne gemeinsame Knoten.

Gruß
L
NorthCrab_upload (2023-04-21 12:10:23+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1164431781

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
user_5359 (2023-04-21 16:29:13+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I remove your SEO SPAM (mostly foreign keys)
MxxCon (2023-04-25 03:23:22+00:00): Wow, Fabio Scalia Salon. You added data to OSM and EVERY single tag you added is wrong. Impressive👏
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135191110
mueschel (2023-04-22 14:35:13+00:00): Hallo,
gibt es irgendwo eine Dokumentation zu den ganzen neuen letter_box-Tags? Inklusive deren Rechtschreibfehlern ("lenght")
Tatfahren (2023-04-22 16:23:16+00:00): Momentan noch nicht, bei den längen und Höhenattributen ist das noch nicht ausgereift (nur auf Einzelboxen anwendbar), da arbeite ich noch dran. Zu den neuen tags: ich habe intensiv nach bestand tags gesucht aber keine gefunden. Im Wikipedia steht ja das man in diesem fall eigene tags nutzen darf. Auf anderen Seiten stand dann aber, das im Wiki nur dokumentiert wird wie es gemacht wird, nicht wie es gemacht werden sollte. Daher habe ich bisher nur eine seite für die Zeitungsrollen (letter_tubes)  erstellt. 
Eine Dokumentation ist bisher in einer Word Datei bei mir Zuhause auf dem Rechner. 

Mit den ganzen Briefkastenmaßen hab ich das am Abend als ich müde war dann wohl etwas übertrieben. In der EU gibt es eine Norm zur Briefkasteneinwurfgröße, das ist theoretisch sinnvoll zu erfassen ob diese eingehalten wird. Die ganzen anderen maße wären theoretisch sinnvoll fürs 3D Rendering des Briefkastens, ( aber wer macht denn sowas).

Der Hintergrund dazu: ich bin in Braunsdorf Werbezusteller, und wollte die Postkästen mit Werbeverboten und Zustellgrößen einmal dokumentieren, eventuell auch um das später für einen Postrouter zu nutzen.

Ich war auch am überlegen erstmal im Forum eine Meinung einzuholen, hatte aber Angst vor der vermutlich massenhaften Kritik, da das ja schon sehr ins Mikromapping geht.
mueschel (2023-04-27 17:16:35+00:00): Hallo,
ich denke auch, dass das zu viele Details sind - die ja auch nicht einfach zu erfassen sind bei privaten Briefkästen auf Privatgrundstücken.

So viele Details zu den Einwurfschlitzen erfassen wir ja noch nicht mal bei öffentlichen Briefkästen.
Tatfahren (2023-04-27 18:07:24+00:00): Ich würde dazu tendieren Werbeverbote zu erfassen, damit lässt sich eine effiziente Zustellung Planen. 

Dazu die Einwurfschlitzbreite ob sie der Eu Norm entsprechen, und ob als Alternative Zeitungsrollen zur Verfügung stehen. Damit kann man etwaige Probleme in der Zustellung vorraussehen. 

Hinsichtlich der Position der Briefkästen auf Privatgrundstücken sehe ich eher weniger probleme, da die Daten (wenn sie überhaupt von anderen genutzt werden) wohl nahezu ausschließlich von zustellern genutzt werden, welche entsprechende Briefkästen auf Privatgrundstücken ohne Probleme nutzen können. Diese können die Daten dann aktuell halten, solange sie benötigt werden. Meines Wissens nach haben große Anbieter sowieso ihre eigenen listen, an die kommt man aber wahrscheinlich nicht ohne weiteres ran.

Achja, wenn du auf Privatgrundstücken keine Möglichkeit hast die Details zu erfassen, kann man wahrscheinlich auch nicht die Position des Briefkastens erfassen. Kann man den Briefkasten von der Straße genügend erkennen, lassen sich im Regelfall auch werbeverbote und Zeitungsrollen erkennen. Die Einwurfbreite lässt sich ganz unauffällig mit dem Einwurf eines entsprechend breiten briefes überprüfen, ich habe z.B. das glück das meine Zeitung exakt den maßen der Briefkastennorm entspricht. Von daher ist das leicht vom Datennutzer zu erfassen.
eggie (2023-04-21 12:39:14+00:00): Marcel

Geef de amenity = (bv library en community_centre ) aan op de adresnode  Niet op de gebouwomtrek.



https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=135191376
eggie (2023-04-21 12:44:18+00:00): bieb en ontmoetingscentrum apart op adresnode getagd. Je ziet anders ook geen symbool van een bieb. 
Groet
eggie
Marcel Lambrechts (2023-04-21 12:48:48+00:00): Thanks Eggie, excuses voor het extra werk!
Groet,
Marcel
eggie (2023-04-21 12:53:29+00:00): No problem..   Het is geen extra werk.. Ik screen gewoon edits...
Zie https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussions?c=Netherlands#7/52.308/5.663

Ook wel leerzaam als je net begint.

Mapse
eggie
eggie (2023-04-21 12:35:35+00:00):  Beste kalamarin.
Je hoeft aan reguliere wegen geen oneway=no toe te voegen.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=135191411
MVG
eggie
kalamarin (2023-04-22 14:44:35+00:00): I thought it was better to specify it. I won't do it then. Thank you.
muralito (2023-04-21 13:53:24+00:00): Hola. Todo lo que no sea efectivamente un nombre, va en la etiqueta "description".
user_5359 (2023-04-21 16:27:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I remove your SEO SPAM (mostly foreign keys)!
Hans Thompson (2023-04-21 21:45:55+00:00): Sorry, how is this spam? Is this not a real location for the service?
ZeLonewolf (2023-04-22 17:18:45+00:00): I've reverted this changeset. user_5359, in the future, please take more care in not removing legitimate additions to the map.
user_5359 (2023-04-22 17:23:31+00:00): Then please also correct the 10 out of 11 keys that are misspelled. We cannot use such nonsense in OSM and automatic changes are also prohibited.
ZeLonewolf (2023-04-22 17:33:02+00:00): user_5359, this is the first edit by a brand-new user.  Please make an attempt to be welcoming and help other users learn from their mistakes rather than being a jerk about it.

I've corrected the tags, and you could have too.

Unfortunately, this is not the first time you've had difficulty working with others on the project, and your repeated abrasive behavior is the kind of thing that drives people away.

I would invite you to consider whether this project is a good fit for you.
muralito (2023-04-21 13:50:22+00:00): Hola. El amenity=fuel es para estaciones de servicio "comunes". Para trenes, barcos, etc, se usan otras etiquetas. Ver s://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:amenity=fuel
muralito (2023-04-21 13:51:00+00:00): Se usa railway=fuel.
 Ver https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenRailwayMap/Tagging#Fuelling_station
FerroArg (2023-04-21 15:16:01+00:00): Okey muchas gracias! disculpe por mis errores es mi primera vez agregando datos
muralito (2023-04-21 15:33:35+00:00): No hace falta disculparse. Todos tuvimos y tendremos algunos errores.
Dale para adelante y segui mapeando lo que interese, que es como esto funciona.
ndm (2023-04-21 20:15:20+00:00): These sections cannot be driven by a normal bus -- it needs to be reverted.
ndm (2023-04-21 20:15:04+00:00): This section cannot be driven by a normal bus -- it needs to be reverted.
wkdgs (2023-04-24 11:14:50+00:00): Hi,

ich hab den "description"-Tag nochmal angepasst, da er etwas zu sehr nach Werbetext klang.
Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:description

Die Schwerpunktbereiche habe ich drin gelassen und das Gründungsjahr findet sich jetzt im "start_date"-Tag.

Die Schwerpunktbereiche müsst ihr nochmal ergänzen, da der Text wohl zu lang war und beim Punkt "Haut" abgeschnitten wurde.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135192010
wkdgs (2023-04-24 11:08:31+00:00): Hi,

ich glaube du hast aus Versehen das PH off entfernt. Ich vermute mal sowohl Sonntags als auch an Feiertage ist die Apotheke geschlossen. Das wäre dann "...; Su,PH off"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135192461