piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_18305684 (2023-06-03 17:31:25+00:00): Hi,

if you look at taginfo https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/natural#values, you will see, at the last page, I'm the only one who used these "bad tags" : in fact I try to improve the area but there are many things to do and I have no time to finished them in one day. So I put these temporary tags (which are "neutral" because not used by anyone/any software/any map) just to remember what I have done and where I need to continue my improvements.

Like I said, these tags are temporary : water2d is currently removed for example because I have made what I wanted to do in its area.

Localization of others are changing in time according to my improvements (currently I work on water3)

Best regards
cserpell (2023-05-23 22:00:53+00:00): Gracias por la actualización. Reagregaré la dirección, ya que se fue la comisaría, pero la dirección continúa allí.
MxxCon (2023-05-25 05:33:24+00:00): Hello.
When mapping features please pay attention not to connect/snap them to each other unless they are actually attached. In this case you made a bench part of the walking path, which is not correct.

Additionally, in general in OSM(other than a few exceptions) if you want to list multiple values they should be separated by ";" . In this case rather than "colour=black and green" it should be "colour=black;green". 👍
If you have any questions, feel free to ask.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136471694
adrianojbr (2023-05-23 21:26:04+00:00): Olá, Dudiii!

Se a via é particular (acesso somente com autorização), a etiqueta a ser usada é access=private.

hgv=no significa que não é permitido de nenhum modo o acesso de caminhões pesados.

Abraço!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136471799
jeslop (2023-05-24 15:13:47+00:00): Hola hechizero. Los nombres de las calles se añaden al segmento que representa el vial, no en un punto. Los corrijo.
Si quieres saber más: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Gu%C3%ADa_de_principiantes

Saludos

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
Glassman (2023-05-25 16:34:43+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136471823
Glassman (2023-05-25 16:37:11+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136471891
Glassman (2023-05-25 16:34:39+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136471906
adrianojbr (2023-05-23 21:30:16+00:00): Olá, Dudiii!

Essa balsa já estava com as etiquetas access=no + bicycle=yes + foot=yes + motorcar=yes + motorcycle=yes, o que significa que somente é permitido o acesso de ciclistas, pedestres, automóveis e motocicletas, respectivamente, sendo todos os demais meios de transporte proibidos. Por isso, não há necessidade de incluir restrição para veículos pesados (hgv=no).

Abraço!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136471943
Glassman (2023-05-25 16:34:55+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136471944
Glassman (2023-05-25 16:38:11+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136471954
adrianojbr (2023-05-23 21:30:38+00:00): Idem.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136471959
Glassman (2023-05-25 16:35:23+00:00): #TIP: square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136471970
Glassman (2023-05-25 16:38:29+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136471983
Glassman (2023-05-25 16:35:35+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136471997
Glassman (2023-05-25 16:38:40+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136472003
Glassman (2023-05-25 16:38:54+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136472027
infeeeee (2023-05-24 12:09:50+00:00): Szia!

Nem létezik ilyen intézmény, hogy 
Szent Gellért Katolikus Általános Iskola és Szent Gellért Katolikus Gimnázium. Összevonták őket 1997-ben, mint Szent Gellért Katolikus Általános Iskola és Gimnázium, és jelölve is van mint egy reláció: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15797616

A gimnázium épületéről miért szedted le a wikidatát, az az az épület.
itineris (2023-05-24 12:19:21+00:00): Szia!

A kapcsolatot láttam - kerestem is, hogy miért van kiírva a név a semmi közepére. Az iskola weblapját is láttam, ráadásul ismerős gyerekek is járnak ide.

De: Valahogyan jelölni kellene, hogy melyik fele melyik. Mint ahogyan az óvodáknál sem ugyanazt a nevet használjuk a kerület összes intézményére, attól még, hogy adminisztratíve összevonták őket. Vagy ahogyan azt is az épületre írt névvel szokták jelezni, ha másik telephelyen van az alsó és felső tagozat.
Hogy a két épület eltérő utca/házszámáról ne is beszéljek.

A Wikidata hivatkozás csak egy üres placeholder, érdemi információ nélkül. De visszarakhatod, ha lényegesnek érzed.
infeeeee (2023-05-24 13:39:58+00:00): Honlapjukon így szerepel a térképre kattintva: Szent Gellért Katolikus Általános Iskola és Gimnázium,
gimnáziumi épület

https://szt-gellert.hu/cikk.php?menu=110&cikk=eler

Valami hasonló kéne szerintem, mert most úgy tűnik mintha külön intézmény lenne a hosszú, hivatalosnak hangzó, ráadásul korábban létező név miatt. Emiatt nem neveztem el annó amikor összerelációztam, mert nem tudtam eldönteni mi legyen. Valahogy jelölni kéne, azzal egyetértek.
itineris (2023-05-24 13:45:42+00:00): "Szt. Gellért - gimnáziumi épület"?

Az egyetemeknél könnyebb, mert azoknak van bevált rövidítésük.
infeeeee (2023-05-24 13:49:13+00:00): Ez jobb! Inkább a "Szent" kiírva.
itineris (2023-05-24 13:55:41+00:00): Így tettem.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136501929
Aleksandar Matejevic (2023-06-05 13:36:49+00:00): Can you please fix R15898754 - Mesopotamia Township 	
and
R15898755 - Bloomfield Township
DrDisaster (2023-06-05 13:42:10+00:00): I welcome guidance on this... I've been struggling with the township boundaries.
M!dgard (2023-05-23 20:33:37+00:00): Zie https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3310647
Artem_Gagarin (2023-05-24 07:13:00+00:00): Помогите соединить дороги.
MxxCon (2023-05-25 05:42:45+00:00): Hello.
Please note this edit is going to be reverted.
It is incorrect to glue benches to walking paths. They should be positioned where they are in the real world.
Features should be connected/glued to each in OSM only if they are actually connected in the real world.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136472359
jdayseid (2023-05-28 16:36:50+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for checking this. 

Sorry didn't get to respond to you sooner. 

I am new to OpenStreetMap.

The benches to flank the path but I guess they are not actually connected to it.

I am a busy teacher whose students and their parents counted and started mapping the benches of our local park with BetaNYC.

The parent who mapped them from my account did a lot of work. 

 Is there a way to restore the benches that were mapped and simply move them so that they are not affixed to the path? 

Thanks for letting us know.
MxxCon (2023-05-28 16:48:16+00:00): Jazzy already went through the area and remapped those benches as combined lines rather nodes glued to the walking path🙂
jdayseid (2023-05-28 16:55:07+00:00): Awesome. It was a parent rather than myself who was doing the mapping and I wasn't sure how many benches she actually got in. So looking at the map I wasn't sure how many were "lost."

We still have more of them to map. I'll be in touch with Jazzy about doing it correctly next time.

Thanks again for your help.
J
eggie (2023-05-24 05:04:55+00:00): Dag RJS

Ik heb van de andere tracks.. Gedeeltelijk is het trouwens een path daar access=no verwijderd en vervangen door vehicle=no  en motor_vehicle =no (achter de slagboom) 
access=no is een gebiedsverbod. Bv voor miltaire terreinen. 
Ik kan me niet herinneren dat hier staat Verboden toegang muv wandelaars. 
Het pad zal nu ook zichtbaarder worden op de kaart.
Mocht je meer weten.. laat maar weten.
MVG
eggie
ivanbranco (2023-05-24 07:19:41+00:00): Ciao Paolo, benvenuto su OpenStreetMap,

se i sentieri esistono ma sono in proprietà privata andrebbe aggiunto loro il tag access=private, non cancellati, per cui verranno probabilmente ripristinati.
MarcoR (2023-05-25 05:30:30+00:00): Concordo e segnalo che quei sentieri rimossi sono ben presenti sulla heatmap di Strava (sembrerebbe che molte persone passino di lì).
Paolo Zunino (2023-05-25 12:14:27+00:00): Ciao e grazie del suggerimento, li metterò privati. @MarcoR il mio intento era eliminarli che non appaiano più come segmento su strava, (se sai come si fa, un aiuto è molto apprezzato) in quanto sono sentieri su area privata, creati prima di strava, che finiscono nel cortile di una casa, creando pericoli e problematiche varie.
MarcoR (2023-05-25 20:01:44+00:00): I segmenti pubblici di Strava possono essere segnalati a Strava stessa ma non credo che serva a molto e in più l'unico motivo che ti permettono di indicare è "Incitamento all’odio o linguaggio offensivo nel nome del segmento" (tentare non nuoce). Strava si basa sulle mappe/dati Mapbox che a loro volta si basano su OpenStreetMap ma aggiornano quello che vogliono loro (talvolta qualche strada rimane "sbagliata" per anni) e con frequenza a me ignota. Puoi provare a segnalare a loro la strada privata cliccando su "Improve this map" in basso a destra nelle mappe di Strava. Anche qui, onestamente non so a quanto serva.

Buona fortuna,
Marco.
Glassman (2023-05-25 16:44:42+00:00): The  road you added off of Foxtrot Lane looks like it should be a driveway. Also the building labeled as a house looks to me just an old foundation. No longer a building. Can you review this edit?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136472628
qugeb (2024-03-31 18:58:11+00:00): Eine Frage:
Du hast hier einen einsamen Freileitungsmasten bei Höchstadt erstellt, kann das ein Versehen sein? Da das CS ja im allgemeinen am Europakanal verortet ist.
Siehe auch https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4121977
lipuma (2023-05-24 17:48:14+00:00): Hi eerib, in this changeset you added a way which I think was meant to become an area with the tag `leisure=golf_course'. But, right now it's just a way with the tag `_leisure=golf_course' (note the _ in front of leisure)

Just a heads up, happy mapping!
eerib (2023-05-24 21:06:04+00:00): Thank you for catching that! Just fixed it.
jaap de vries (2023-05-26 10:49:19+00:00): De milieustraat Malden heb je aan diverse gebouwen geplakt, dat is niet de bedoeling. Ik zal de afvalstromen ook nog even benoemen, want niet alles kan je hier inleveren dan moet je naar de Kanaalstraat
mueschel (2023-05-24 09:57:49+00:00): Hi,
something went wrong here. You added hundreds of buildings with many foreign tags that should not appear in OSM.
This seems to be an import of data - where can we find the mandatory documentation? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
ivanbranco (2023-05-26 07:51:31+00:00): Ciao Maorland, novità?
user_3164765 (2023-05-26 09:48:13+00:00): HI. I would like to explain that this is not a massive import, but a localized insertion of elements of the official cartography, licensed under the CC BY 4.0. (see the link: https://www.regione.toscana.it/-/cartografia-tecnica-regionale-e-scarico-dati-geografici ). The origin of the data is correctly cited as requested by the author.
In this area the buildings derived from the official Cartography of the Tuscany Region on a scale of 1:10,000.  I’m just making localized updates with more detail and manual entry of non-existing buildings on the map.
Where other mappators have worked (bat this is mostly a no-mapped area) I always care to inform them about the work I’m doing.
I will also delete the tags in Italian.
Thanks for your advice.
mueschel (2023-05-26 09:54:27+00:00): Please read this statement of the 
OSMF Licence Working Group regarding cc-by licensed data:
https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/03/17/use-of-cc-by-data/
user_3164765 (2023-05-26 10:27:31+00:00): OK thank you. Is it possible to cancel the job and go back to the previous state of the map?
mueschel (2023-05-28 10:15:56+00:00): I reverted the changesets adding the buildings. It seems that the cleanest way to add them again is drawing them by hand from aerial images - it's not too many so this won't take long.
user_3164765 (2023-05-29 16:30:19+00:00): Thank you.
I think the best way is to draw the polygons by hand from the Geoscope-WMS service technical cartography of the Tuscany Region, it is more precise than aerial images. Then use the aerial images for inserting the most recent buildings.  I hope this is possible.
I found this document: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Toscana
b-holdet (2023-05-25 10:16:22+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10922701122 findes ikke mere på lokationen. Der er en Crown Kebab i stedet for.
b-holdet (2023-05-25 10:41:14+00:00): Tjek evt. CVR for om stedet har en ophørsdato:
https://datacvr.virk.dk/enhed/produktionsenhed/1024953943?fritekst=1024953943&sideIndex=0&size=10

I dette tilfælde for P-nummeret:
Ophørsdato = 31.12.2022

Så der er ingen Burgertown på dette punkt længere.
Kunne heller ikke se den fysisk på stedet.
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2023-05-25 15:59:20+00:00): tak, har fjernet den
fox91fox (2023-09-21 16:06:53+00:00): Ciao Lorenzo, su che base hai eliminato il passaggio a livello e scollegato la strada che attraversa la ferrovia?
eggie (2023-05-24 05:14:27+00:00): Dag mopzeela.. Dit is dus niet handig..
Nu zal een willekeurige mapper het pad weer intekenen.
Je ziet immers op goede luchtfoto's het pad lopen. 
Het was juist getagd met disused:highway=path en niet zichtbaar meer op de kaart. ..alleen als een 'lege' lijn met note.
De wandelroute was al eerder door mij omgeleid.
Wat was het probleem? 
Wanneer daar toch wandelaars gaan lopen is dat niet op grond van data uit OSM.
Je edits.. 
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=136473830

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-05-24 05:17:26+00:00): De indertijd omgeleide wandelroute
https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#?map=16.0/53.0854/6.2021
Dit is de route die wandelkaarten aangeven op grond van OSM.
notmyproblem1 (2026-04-10 08:29:56+00:00): Fonte delle "Linee" ?
Glassman (2023-05-25 16:49:03+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136474077
Glassman (2023-05-25 16:50:36+00:00): The road you added 132nd Pl SW has an impossible turns. I revised the street to show a turning circle in the cul-de-sac. Also, in OSM we spell out street names since software has a hard time unabbreviating.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136474077
NorthCrab_upload (2023-05-23 22:00:17+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1175455195
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/431268252

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Glassman (2023-05-25 16:51:36+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136474168
Glassman (2023-05-25 16:51:54+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136474222
Glassman (2023-05-25 16:52:12+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136474432
Glassman (2023-05-25 16:52:29+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136474564
Glassman (2023-05-25 16:53:03+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.

#TIP: square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q"
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136474575
Glassman (2023-05-25 16:53:18+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136474584
kartler175 (2023-05-25 09:27:30+00:00): Do NOT delete objects and then map them again! You will destroy the chronology of the objects and the work of your fellow mappers.
Do NOT tag objects as something they are not. For example  wooded areas as buildings.
GilB (2023-06-09 20:12:26+00:00): Bonjour
Plutot que supprimer les POI, il vaut mieux les désactiver en utilisant le préfixe was:* et ajouter le tag shop=vacant + survey_date=
Avec la suppression, on perd tout l'historique du commerce et son évolution dans le temps. D'un manière générale la suppression des éléments est dommageable, il vaut mieux privilégier la suppression des tags que de l'élément lui-même sauf en cas d'erreur.
En tout cas, c'est la pratique que nous avons avec plusieurs contributeurs à Nantes.
Discutons-en !
aTarom (2023-05-24 06:10:38+00:00): Hola, данель, han aparecido tags nuevos en masa, como:

beginLifespanVersion
beginning
conditionOfConstruction
currentUse
documentLink
end
format
gml_id
horizontalGeometryEstimatedAccuracy
horizontalGeometryEstimatedAccuracy_uom
horizontalGeometryReference
informationSystem=
localId
namespace
numberOfBuildingUnits
numberOfDwellings
officialAreaReference
reference
referenceGeometry
sourceStatus
value
value_uom

Puedes revisarlo, por favor?
mueschel (2023-05-24 09:59:21+00:00): This seems to be an import of data.
What is the source of the data and is its license compatible with OSM and ODbL?
Where can we find the mandatory documentation? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
данель (2023-05-24 23:03:53+00:00): Ya han sido eliminadas las etiquetas.
aTarom (2023-05-25 06:03:35+00:00): Gracias данель por tu participación y rapidez en solucionarlo. Solo quedaría el tag

"reference"
por el más extendido
"catastro:ref"

https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/catastro%3Aref#overview

te parece bien?

Gracias de nuevo por participar y ayudar en mantener la BD ordenada

PD: hay un proyecto de importación de Catastro, si quieres más información puedes participar en el grupo específico de telegram
https://t.me/OSMes_Catastro
y su página con las instrucciones
https://catastro.openstreetmap.es/home

Saludos cordiales
данель (2023-05-25 18:03:42+00:00): Gracias por la info. Ya he cambiado la etiqueta reference por catastro:ref.
jeslop (2023-05-24 15:19:10+00:00): Hola RafaelBenMoz.
Has añadido un elemento que ya estaba en el mapa. Si quieres saber más de OSM: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Gu%C3%ADa_de_principiantes
Procura no añadir información duplicada.

Saludos

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
grabra (2023-05-26 21:02:03+00:00): Reviewed
grabra (2023-05-26 21:16:44+00:00): Self review
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136475426
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2023-05-24 01:42:24+00:00): مرحبا أستاذي الكريم:
وسم name يوضع فيه الاسم المحلي في المكان والاسم العربي أجدر أن يوضع في كلا الوسمين name & name:ar
كما نفيدكم بوجود نقاش على القائمة البريدية على اسم هذا المكان ولم يتم التوصل فيه لحل إلى الآن ونرجوا منكم عدم تغيير قيمة الوسم name وعليه سيتم عكس هذا التغيير
NorthCrab_upload (2023-05-23 23:30:14+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10922962430
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2338904583

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
jacobwhall (2023-05-23 23:30:36+00:00): * Crosby Avenue
BCNorwich (2023-05-24 05:51:22+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The church building was already tagged and named correctly, (not using all capital letters). So there is no need for your new POI, which as a name only is of no use in OSM. Also, the link to Google Maps is not good for our totally open database.

Lastly you somehow added your POI to 6 route relations and a station.

Thus I've reverted this changeset. If you need help with anything or there is a problem please just ask.

Regards Bernard.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2023-05-24 12:27:55+00:00): They could be mapped as building=shed, which would be correct
EdoBoo (2023-05-24 12:15:37+00:00): Ottimo lavoro di aggiornamento 💪
RinBalzo (2023-05-24 21:00:11+00:00): Ti ringrazio!
emersonveenstra (2023-05-24 00:48:44+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for your contributions! In the future, please make sure your changeset comment accurately describes what you changed. There were no sidewalks changed in this changeset
MxxCon (2023-05-25 05:56:39+00:00): Hello.
This map should represent things the way they are now, not at some point in the future. It's not correct to map a non-existing feature with "Coming Soon". If I'm looking at a map now, it's irrelevant that something might happen at some point in the future. 
At the very least please use opening_date= and/or construction tag if appropriate.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136475787
daniel_solow (2023-05-26 20:14:06+00:00): you're right. i'll remove it
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136475787
Rovastar (2023-05-24 00:15:14+00:00): Wrong changeset comment....goddamn autocomplete
citrula (2023-06-22 09:07:38+00:00): Hello 2feet, please stop removing data from the map. I understand that this path is private, but removing it entirely is not the solution. Marking a path as private informs users that access is not allowed, and further emphasizes that it is not suitable for public use. If it is is removed, people may add it back without knowledge of the usage rights.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136476356
Fizzie-DWG (2023-11-16 03:35:29+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1223998671