piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeatNit (2025-02-12 19:44:00+00:00): היי. קודם כל רוצה להגיד לך תודה על כל העבודה שאתה עושה :)

אבל שמתי לב שאתה משתמש בתפקידים
forward/backward
כשאתה עורך קווים בתחבורה ציבורית. להבנתי, לא אמורים להשתמש בהם:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route%3Dbus
"When mapping with PTv2, the empty role should be used."

בנוסף PTNA מתריע על זה בתור שגיאה:
https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/IL/JM/IL-JM-Jerusalem-Analysis.html
NeatNit (2025-02-12 19:47:04+00:00): גם כאן כתוב:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:route
These roles should not be used on public transport version 2 routes (use empty role instead).
mcliquid (2025-02-12 13:56:58+00:00): Hallo ti-lo,
vielen Dank für die Änderung!
Das von dir verwendete Tag gibt es aktuell erst zwei Mal weltweit und beide Male hast du sie ergänzt:
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/museum%3Atype=open_air

Meintest du hier "museum=open_air" mit aktuell 362 Nutzungen?
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/museum=open_air

War das bewusst oder aus versehen?

Viele Grüße
mcliquid
ti-lo (2025-02-12 15:12:01+00:00): Das war Absicht. Das Konzept ist auf der Diskussionsseite erklärt https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:museum:type%3Dopen_air. Problem beim aktuellen : "a bit messy" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:museum%3Dopen_air. Ich würde sogar sagen "historisch gewachsen" ;-)
ti-lo (2025-02-12 15:20:53+00:00): Zur Info : Auf diesem Knoten wurde urprünglich museum:type=municipal verwendet https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/672531449/history, wurde in operator:type korrigiert. Bei der Gelegenheit open_air ergänzt. Die ganze museum:type - Logik hier : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:museum:type
mcliquid (2025-02-12 15:23:06+00:00): Alles klar :) Dann ändere ich das hier wieder auf das etabliertere und bisher dokumentierte Tag zurück, wie es zuvor war.

Die Diskussionsseiten sind ja für eine Diskussion da und nicht um dort zu sagen "Ich mach das jetzt einfach so". Siehe auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal_process

Sonst schreibe ich schnell hier https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:highway
das ich es besser fände, wenn man statt highway=* jetzt freeway=* verwendet und ändere 270.290.660 Objekte weltweit auf einen Schlag um.

Denkst du das wäre ok? ;-)
ti-lo (2025-02-12 15:32:19+00:00): Nein finde ich nicht o.k., war ja vorher überhaupt nicht angegeben. Kann also keine Rede sein von "zurück ändern". Ist höchstens "Fortschritt aufhalten". Falls Du den "history"-Wert meinst : Da fehlt bisher eine Differenzierung zu "archaeological", gern ergänzen https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:museum=history vs. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:museum=archaeological. Was vorherige jahrelange fruchtlose Diskussionen betrifft : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Any_tags_you_like#When_to_create_a_proposal.
ti-lo (2025-02-12 15:34:13+00:00): Das schon gelesen ? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:museum:type%3Dopen_air (die Methode ist nicht aus der Luft gegriffen)
mcliquid (2025-02-12 15:38:02+00:00): Das schon gelesen?
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/freilichtmuseen-wie-taggen/79104
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/undiscussed-wiki-edits-by-the-user-rtfm-museum-open-air/125667/
ti-lo (2025-02-12 15:43:15+00:00): Nein, werde ich auch nicht (ab  2017). Eine Zusammenfassung würde hier hin gehören (sofern überhaupt etwas dabei heraus kam) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:museum%3Dopen_air
mcliquid (2025-02-12 15:46:51+00:00): Das ist aber keine konstruktive Diskussion oder siehst du das anders?
Ich kann deinen Namen nicht auf der Talk-Seite lesen, du hast dich offenbar niemals dort eingebracht.

Wenn ich mir den Konsens der aktuellen Talk-Beiträge durchlese, dann ist das gewünschte Tagging "museum=open_air". Liest du das anders?
mcliquid (2025-02-12 15:51:43+00:00): Ergänzend:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:tourism%3Dmuseum#On_subtypes_and_topics_/_museum_subjects
Sowie: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:museum_type#Not_very_clear

Du bist doch auch schon ein paar Tage dabei, woher kommt bei dir die unkooperative Stimmung gegenüber mir?
ti-lo (2025-02-12 15:58:43+00:00): Das Deutsche Forum soll die einzig wahre Quelle sein ? Hat der Rest der Welt nicht mitzureden und soll eine seit 2017 andauernde fruchtlose Diskussion komplett durchlesen ? Hast Du überhaupt die von mir vorgeschlagene Variante mal angeschaut (ein 2-Zeiler) ? Oder geht es hier mehr um Stuhlkreise als um das mappen ? Die "unkooperative Stimmung" kommt bei mir immer auf, wenn es nicht um die Sache geht.
mcliquid (2025-02-12 16:10:09+00:00): Dann lass uns das sachlich angehen:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:museum:type%3Dopen_air
eggie (2025-02-11 19:57:48+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-02-11 20:09:01+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
woodpeck_repair (2025-02-17 10:41:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 162605674, 162605678, 162605680 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from YaaRamis after several requests for respectful changeset comments were ignored
woodpeck_repair (2025-02-17 10:41:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 162605674, 162605678, 162605680 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from YaaRamis after several requests for respectful changeset comments were ignored
domiden (2025-02-11 20:59:49+00:00): Should be: “… 35–39 …” not “… 66 …”
kapazao (2025-02-12 10:16:39+00:00): Hola, por favor trata de no hacer conjuntos de cambios tan grandes y dispersos. Aquí realizaste ediciones en Loja y Marbella que no tienen relación alguna. Trata de hacer cada cosa en un conjunto de cambios y explica lo que has hecho resumidamente para que los demás podamos revisarlo mejor.
Un saludo y gracias por tus contribuciones
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162405750
kapazao (2025-02-12 10:18:17+00:00): ¿qué significa el etiquetado not:network:wikidata añadido a la relación 16228313?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162405750
adas (2025-04-11 07:14:02+00:00): Ta droga rowerowa jest na całym odcinku po północnej stronie? Ona już chyba ma asfalt na dużym odcinku.
eggie (2025-02-11 20:59:12+00:00): Hi  Reshaped again.. source BAG.
PDOK is not a good source for reshaping buildings.

Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2025-02-11 21:00:58+00:00): Hi You removed the buildingtag Why?
Demoslished?

Gr eggie
eggie (2025-02-11 21:05:00+00:00): https://viewer.satellietdataportaal.nl/@53.17052,5.416421,19/?datastrip=20250206_PNEO-03

Nieuwe gebouwen kun je laten importeren via het forum van OSM middels het draadje BAG importverzoeken.
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/nl/43
cad01 (2025-02-11 21:29:50+00:00): Hi yes the building is deconstructed as of today there was just the steel frame left. As far as I know the areal is going to be a parking lot when deconstruction is completed. 

Gr cad
eggie (2025-02-11 21:50:23+00:00): Okay.... clear!

Gr eggie
JeroenHoek (2025-02-12 17:51:00+00:00): Klopt, de Aldi is in november verhuisd. Lang heeft dit pand er niet gestaan trouwens. Bouwjaar 2018!

Hij staat in de BAG al op 'in onderzoek' zo te zien.

Dit wordt voorlopig inderdaad een parkeerterrein:

https://omroepzilt.nl/nieuws/algemeen/aldi-harlingen/
pavvv (2025-02-13 12:27:20+00:00): Czy ta linia nie powinna też dostać nazwy? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/387482474
Programista Kolejowy (2025-02-13 16:52:14+00:00): Możliwe że przeoczyłem. Jeśli poprawiłeś to dzięki
Yog Sot (2025-02-13 21:42:13+00:00): ja poprawiłem. pavvv cię sprawdza czy dalej byki robisz, więc musisz się przyłozyć ;)
Langlaeufer (2025-02-24 08:40:53+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen_kartieren
D239,1022-10 -> highway=footway bicycle=yes und keine segregated
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162407115
Snusmumriken (2025-02-11 21:30:24+00:00): Hej

Legumes hemsida anger att adressen är Bysistorget 8 och den är adressen är inlagd via en relation. Så jag undrar vad är källan till dina uppgifter?
felwal (2025-02-11 22:03:24+00:00): Hej,

Syftet var att bara uppdatera öppettider och lägga till webbsida. Jag misstänker att jag hade en utdaterad version av kartan nedladdad och att Organic Maps då inte enbart laddar upp mina ändringar. Ber om ursäkt för detta, ska ha i åtanke framöver.
Tjuro (2025-02-12 10:23:37+00:00): Beste BertMule,

De ruimte tussen velden is onderdeel van het zonnepark.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162423479
Fizzie-DWG (2025-02-21 05:24:20+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17294
JJIglesias (2025-02-12 05:38:05+00:00): Hi Pascal, Thanks for editing in Bolivia

What is, NeisEditSupport v.0.1.0? Could not find any reference to it.

BsRgds
JJ
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-12 06:25:16+00:00): Hi JJIglesias,

NeisEditSupport is a small tool which I have programmed as a prototype to support the editing of OSM Notes. It is currently only available to me. 

Best regards, Pascal
bbqman (2025-02-11 21:32:54+00:00): source also: wikidata, wikipedia
gurglypipe (2025-02-12 11:59:16+00:00): Hiya, thanks for all your additions to Stainton recently, it’s nice to see more detail being added to the map!

As you’re adding a lot of geometry (which is good), there are a couple of things you should probably be aware of to get the  best results:

1. You can make buildings square easily by selecting them then pressing ‘Q’. This helps keep the map tidy.

2. The aerial imagery isn’t actually properly aligned to ground truth. You need to align it before starting to edit — this is why some of the buildings I’ve tidied up after you in Stainton will now look misaligned to you.

Turn on the ‘OSMUK Cadastral Parcels’ overlay in the ‘Background Settings’ panel on the right, then adjust the imagery offset until features are aligned with the blue cadastral parcels lines. This alignment varies across the country, but with the current imagery for Stainton it’s -2.41,-0.76 metres.

Once the imagery is aligned you should be able to trace buildings/walls/etc. and they’re much better aligned with ground truth (i.e. GPS).

Thanks! Let me know if you have any questions :)
iandees (2025-02-11 23:47:44+00:00): It looks like you're removing tags that were added to the existing stops (like metcouncil:site_id, tactile_paving, etc). Please be careful to keep that extra data from OSM mappers.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162408463
eikleinbaum (2025-02-11 23:57:59+00:00): Many of the tags I'm removing were auto imported from a GIS dataset that contain information that like route references that become redundant with updated relationships.  These don't fall within the tagging protocol that is listed in the OSM wiki for bus stops. Is it incorrect to remove tags to fall within the standard for bus stops? Let me know.
eikleinbaum (2025-02-11 23:59:03+00:00): Tag like site ID are moved to "ref"
b-jazz (2025-02-14 20:05:40+00:00): There's a problem with some of your golf course mapping. You've made fairways (for example https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1359162412) that intersect other features on the course. In that example, the green. These intersection shouldn't happen. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls for examples on how to properly map golf courses. Thanks.
pyram (2025-02-13 10:23:05+00:00): Review:
fixed. See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/gran-canaria-kartenfehler-gesamte-flache-fehlt/125770
Glassman (2025-02-12 17:29:42+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162409434
ndf_maypole (2025-02-11 22:33:36+00:00): + futur pôle technique de Wavre
Jrachi (2025-02-12 10:57:46+00:00): Ciao.
Hai messo il reef:REI uguale al ref
Glassman (2025-02-12 01:29:08+00:00): #TIP: use landuse=farmyard for areas where the farmer has buildings, storage, and keeping animals. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dfarmyard
Tijgerd (2025-02-13 08:03:34+00:00): Goedemorgen Waylander1963,

Bij deze aanpassing is er iets apparts gebeurd, vanuit de brug/kfc richting de rotonde, je kunt toch altijd nog naar links gaan op de linker voorsorteer strook (of zelfs terug richting de brug)?
Waarom is deze tag verwijderd..?
eggie (2025-02-13 09:52:59+00:00): Beste Waylander,
Er staan nog wat opmerkingen open waar nooit op gereageerd is:
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=16304204

Reacties worden op prijs gesteld. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-02-13 10:01:43+00:00): reverted by changeset #162459858
dknelson9876 (2025-02-22 17:46:53+00:00): Hi scottfunkel, welcome to OSM! Thanks for your edit. For future reference, when it's not an all-way stop, you can specify which directions stop by putting the highway=stop node on the line where drivers are expected to stop. I've already corrected this change for you. You can read more about tagging stop signs at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dstop
woowza (2025-03-17 17:03:44+00:00): Thank you!!! I completely forgot to do this...
Question, is there a trick in doing this or do you have to manually draw each one?
Mapiate (2025-03-17 17:50:21+00:00): I don't recommend drawing each one manually. I believe there is a plug-in for JOSM but I am just a novice with that tool so can't help much. For this changeset, I used iD editor and generously applied copy/paste.
eggie (2025-02-12 07:04:42+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-02-12 07:09:03+00:00): Houtlaan 59 is volgens de BAG niet in dit gebouw.
Voorlopig verplaats ik de praktijk naar adresnode 59.

MVG
eggie
BCNorwich (2025-02-12 06:22:03+00:00): I've unjoined the wood area from the highways.
ottwiz (2025-02-11 23:19:49+00:00): the reason for the huge changeset is that I removed again a large chunk of forest area, and it caused of course a lot of issues. I also almost removed a state forest but luckily I managed to draw it back.
SimonPoole (2025-02-18 15:29:37+00:00): Hi, you added what might be a new (because it currently doesn't show uo on any aerial imagery that I checked) building here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1359179009 but it is completely untagged, which I assume wasn't intended. Cheers Simon
landscapemapper (2025-02-18 17:08:42+00:00): Thanks for pointing out. It should be building=yes. It a new building. I will fix that.
NeisBot (2025-02-12 06:13:04+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits, particularly those concerning the names you've added or modified.

It seems that some of these names are a bit unusual.

#NameCheck #NeisLab
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-12 06:26:14+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/162411247
Allison P (2025-02-11 23:34:11+00:00): addr:city should contain the postal city, in this case "Holladay", rather than "City Of Holladay"
StreetSurveyor (2025-04-21 15:39:32+00:00): Please reference the city map, the upper left isn't part of the road. Also confirmed via site survey.
StreetSurveyor (2025-04-21 15:43:30+00:00): For Gibson Way.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-02-14 23:39:46+00:00): reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162522111
Taya_S (2025-02-12 06:11:23+00:00): Deleted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162415813

Gulf of Mexico already exists here
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/305639190
rene78 (2025-02-12 05:25:18+00:00): Hi Comino,

Where did you get these opening hours from? They don't match what's listed on the restaurant's website.

Thanks
Rene
Comino (2025-02-12 08:04:53+00:00): Hi Rene!

Thank you for bringing this to my attention. You are correct; I mistakenly used the "Öffnungs-Zeiten." I have now updated them to reflect the "Küchen-Zeiten."

Greetings,

Edwin

https://bluemchen.restaurant/friedrichshafen/
rene78 (2025-02-12 08:06:55+00:00): 👍
NeisBot (2025-02-12 00:13:59+00:00): Hello Juanito1986, welcome to OSM, and thank you for your contributions!

I've taken a look at your recent edits and wanted to discuss a few discrepancies I noticed regarding the surrounding environmental features. Specifically, the locations in your edits don't seem to align with the typical geographical characteristics expected in that area. Here are some (max 10) relevant links to the edits:
https://osm.org/node/12580504126
https://osm.org/way/1359183061
https://osm.org/relation/18693422

Could you please take a look?
Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#Somewhere
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=162411010
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-02-14 23:40:21+00:00): reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162522122
Baloo Uriza (2025-02-12 15:16:17+00:00): Does the parking garage actually have a name?  If not that seems more like a description than a name value.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162411031
NeisBot (2025-02-12 00:16:48+00:00): Hello Juanito1986, welcome to OSM, and thank you for your contributions!

I've taken a look at your recent edits and wanted to discuss a few discrepancies I noticed regarding the surrounding environmental features. Specifically, the locations in your edits don't seem to align with the typical geographical characteristics expected in that area. Here are some (max 10) relevant links to the edits:
https://osm.org/node/12580489418

Could you please take a look?
Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#Somewhere
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=162411140
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-12 06:26:45+00:00): Revert of https://osm.org/changeset/162410439

Thanks.
Tijgerd (2025-02-13 07:55:22+00:00): Goedemorgen Waylander!
Het is gebruikelijker om rijstroken die niet van elkaar gescheiden zijn (door een groenstrook o.i.d. ) als 1 in te tekenen en dan gebruik te maken van lanes.
Zoals je het namelijk hier nog hebt laten staan lijkt het alsof de tunnelstraat (vanuit de tunnel gezien) opeens 3 lanes in totaal richting de rotonde heeft (bij het left|through stuk staat nog lanes = 2)
Ik stel voor om dit terug te draaien want het is mijn inziens geen verbetering en zal misschien door navigatie ook kunnen worden gezien als "neem rechts op de y-splitsing" wanneer je rechtsaf richting Hellingstockstraat wilt gaan.
eggie (2025-02-13 10:00:12+00:00): reverted by changeset #162459786

De wijzigingen na deze changeset heb ik ook teruggedraaid. 
Wanneer je zou reageren zouden we kunnen helpen zoiets aan te passen indien nodig.

MVG
eggie
Waylander1963 (2025-02-13 13:23:50+00:00): Excuses voor de  foutjes. Toch ben ik van mening dat de de rijstroken apart moeten worden aangeven om een zou goed  mogelijke weergave van de situatie te krijgen.
eggie (2025-02-13 14:55:39+00:00): Dag Waylander,

Het heeft te maken met de manier van routeren in OSM (In GPS en routingapps)
Je krijgt dan aanwijzingen.. bv houd recgts aan.
Het aantal rijstroken (niet rijbanen) is met lanes=...  (aantal)  opgenomen in het wegdeel.

Daar staan de codes in van de rijstrookbegeleiding zoals je die ziet en hoort in je navigatie.
Dat zou niet werken als je aparte rijbanen gaat intekenen. Allen bij een fysieke afscheiding (niet de belijning) wordt een aparte rijbaan ingetekend.

In de praktijk kun je ook van rijstrook wisselen.. ook over de doorgetrokken streep. Belangrijk voor hulpdiensten.

Dus hij lijkt allemaal goed wat je doet, maar het is het helaas dus niet. 
Er zit een andere wereld achter. Die van de routering.

MVG
eggie
SomeRailfan (2026-07-23 00:32:00+00:00): Bonjour! Veuillez noter qu'une intersection où il y a des panneaux d'arrêt de tous les côtés nécessite d'être taguée sur chaque approche, avec un node {highway=stop, direction=forward/backward, stop=all}, comme dans les cas où c'est juste un arrêt sur la voie mineure (stop=minor). Il n'est pas possible de juste mettre un  {highway=stop, stop=all} au milieu de l'intersection. Merci!
woodpeck_repair (2025-02-17 10:41:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 162605674, 162605678, 162605680 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from YaaRamis after several requests for respectful changeset comments were ignored
Glassman (2025-02-12 17:31:16+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162412725
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-17 00:58:00+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165050348
Taya_S (2025-02-12 06:39:33+00:00): Full or partial revert of changesets 162413774, 162413882, 162413882

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162416508
NeisBot (2025-02-12 06:14:11+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits, particularly those concerning the names you've added or modified.

It seems that some of these names are a bit unusual.

#NameCheck #NeisLab
Taya_S (2025-02-12 06:40:29+00:00): Full or partial revert of changesets 162414471, 162414506, 162414537, 162414575, 162414665

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162416531
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-12 06:14:52+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits, particularly those concerning the names you've added or modified.

It seems that some of these names are a bit unusual.

#NameCheck #NeisLab
NeisBot (2025-02-12 06:15:53+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits, particularly those concerning the names you've added or modified.

It seems that some of these names are a bit unusual.

#NameCheck #NeisLab
Taya_S (2025-02-12 06:40:30+00:00): Full or partial revert of changesets 162414471, 162414506, 162414537, 162414575, 162414665

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162416531
NeisBot (2025-02-12 06:18:46+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits, particularly those concerning the names you've added or modified.

It seems that some of these names are a bit unusual.

#NameCheck #NeisLab
muralito (2025-02-12 13:05:02+00:00): Ojo que al cambiar esto https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/469216611 de highway=footway a man_made=pier haces que no se pueda caminar por ahi.

Por otro lado, eso no es man_made=pier es man_made=breakwater y ya estaba mapeado aca https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7811373
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-12 17:30:38+00:00): #seo #spam ?
seattlefyi (2025-02-12 14:57:26+00:00): I’d keep them separate. Sometimes it’s appropriate (as in, a gate is part of a fence) but in general I prefer to not attach things as any need to detach in the future makes maintenance very difficult.
pwbriggs (2025-02-13 04:34:50+00:00): Thanks for the feedback, I've separated the features.
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-12 17:31:01+00:00): #seo #spam ?
Taya_S (2025-02-12 06:11:06+00:00): Deleted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162415813

Gulf of Mexico already exists here
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/305639190
Taya_S (2025-02-12 06:11:57+00:00): Oops, that should have been commented in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162410835
citrula (2025-02-12 09:31:53+00:00): Welcome to OSM. This edit looks good to me, thanks for your contribution!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162416011
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-12 17:31:44+00:00): #seo #spam