piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2026-02-23 08:32:48+00:00): Hier wat voorbeelden https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:historic
eggie (2026-02-23 08:47:15+00:00): Een monument naar memorial aangepast.
pomp en zwerfkei ook aangepast.
Niet alles rendert.

MVG
eggie
EleGlobe (2026-02-22 15:47:59+00:00): I forgot to say 1A instead of 1PO which is also displayed, & presumed alt name.
klik (2026-02-26 12:40:51+00:00): Hallo Steffen, 
Du hast Deinen eigen Hinweis offenbar nicht ganz korrekt umgesetzt.
Hier hast Du dem ehemaligen FwHs die Adresse des neuen FwHs gegeben, was sicher falsch ist. 
Statt dessen wolltest Du doch sicher die Daten der Feuerwehr am neuen FwHs eintragen, oder?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178904310
klik (2026-02-26 12:40:55+00:00): Hallo Steffen, 
Du hast Deinen eigen Hinweis offenbar nicht ganz korrekt umgesetzt.
Hier hast Du dem ehemaligen FwHs die Adresse des neuen FwHs gegeben, was sicher falsch ist. 
Statt dessen wolltest Du doch sicher die Daten der Feuerwehr am neuen FwHs eintragen, oder?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178904310
SteffenBrauer (2026-02-27 12:45:27+00:00): Hallo ja sorry, war mir nicht sicher, wie das genau bei einer Änderung funktioniert (sind meine ersten Einträge). Muss/Kann ich das selbst ändern, oder muss das ganze dann neu angelegt werden?
klik (2026-02-27 12:58:38+00:00): Kein Problem und erst mal herzlich willkommen hier.
Ja, Du kannst das selbst auch wieder ändern, also die Tags am alten FwHs löschen und am neuen FwHs eintragen.
Wenn Du das dann alles korrekt eingetragen hast, dann kannst Du Deine Hinweise auch als erledigt kennzeichnen. 
Und schon bist Du perfekt. 
Wenn DU noch Fragen hast, dann immer her damit oder gern auch im Forum (https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/de/56), bei OSM wird dir geholfen.
aceman444 (2026-06-20 12:41:12+00:00): Zdravim, preco vymazavate na adresach znacku ref:minvskaddress? Zda sa, ze Vase zmeny adries su spravne (asi mesto precislovalo niektore adresy), ale identifikator adresy im zostal rovnaky.
Patr1k_P (2026-06-20 18:27:27+00:00): tam kde bola zmena cisiel, tak som ho radsej zmazal, aby nebol nahodou nespravny a prepisal som len ostatne tagy..identifikatori sa daju neskor hromadne naimportovat...bolo by dost pracne kontrolovat okrem ostatnych tagov aj toto
aceman444 (2026-06-21 20:23:38+00:00): Ja len, ze ked uz ste tie adresy vytahovali z registra adries, tak tam boli aj tie identifikatory a dali sa porovnat. Ale ano, asi by to bolo pracnejsie.
OK, prave ich doplnam.
Patr1k_P (2026-06-23 13:00:53+00:00): No ja som to robil čo najjednoduchšie, takže som to len prepísal pomocou zbgis vrstvy, občas to tak spravím keď si niekde všimnem že je zmena.. Väčšinou to však ťahám z dodkovej stránky aby to bolo kompletné ale vtedy tam tie čísla ešte nemal
Marek-M (2026-02-22 18:43:18+00:00): Cześć, nie rozdzielaj DDPiR na dwie linie, gdy nie ma między nimi rozdziału fizycznego. Poprzednie mapowanie było zgodne z wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Rowery#Drogi_dla_pieszych_i_rowerów
FajrAl (2026-06-18 23:57:06+00:00): Mohon dalam memetakannya, jangan diberi nama dari nama pemeta di tag name=*
joshbaryia (2026-02-22 16:39:42+00:00): Initially tracked through GPS, imported the gpx file and then refined manually.
silversurfer83 (2026-02-22 17:11:51+00:00): Hi :)

wenn du einen highway=footway erzeugst, dann benötigst du dort kein bicycle=no und so. Die Werte sind implizit schon gegeben. Nur was auf der Treppe access=designated heißen soll müsstest du mir erklären. Die meisten Router verstehen, dass über Treppen nur Fußgänger geroutet werden

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178905631
GenGap (2026-02-22 17:31:53+00:00): Hi!
Access=delivery muss es sein, sehe gerade. Bzw designated habe ich anscheinend mit destination verwechselt. Also nach dem Motto, wenn du da sein sollst (z. B. liefern), dann darfst du auch da lang gehen. Ich ändere es :-)
silversurfer83 (2026-02-22 17:56:51+00:00): Da kann es auch gerne passieren, dass das autocomplete des Editors dazwischen funkt. 

Alles klar. Dann passt es ja

Cheers
AndyB_66 (2026-02-22 19:44:23+00:00): Once more - please obey the rules: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Dobr%C3%A9_koment%C3%A1%C5%99e_sad_zm%C4%9Bn
Alpha1976 (2026-02-22 20:26:57+00:00): Once more, this is not a dutý so let it be. There are other that ruin my work? By the way, where you from? Is it your town????
Tomas_J (2026-02-23 00:05:55+00:00): If mapper continues to make changes without meaningful comments while there is no reply to your messages for quite some time - there is an option of sending a report to the OSM moderators through his profile, so that they can look at the situation. Then they can either write about the need to do it themselves, or in some cases put the user in a short block to make them understand that they need to make edits differently.
ivanbranco (2026-06-27 13:29:03+00:00): Ciao voschix,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4124572089

è davvero un toret? Sarebbe uno dei pochi mappati fuori Torino.
Jrachi (2026-02-23 07:41:14+00:00): Ciao.
Quale fonte hai utilizzato per creare dei percorsi a catasto escursionistico nazionale?
Hai duplicato relazioni già esistenti.

Ivo
DAVIDE POZZO (2026-02-23 08:13:20+00:00): Buongiorno hai duplicato relazioni gia esistenti in un caso sbagliando la numerazione concordata con la regione Piemonte sei pregato di cancellare quanto fatto . Grazie
rbuffat (2026-02-23 19:43:57+00:00): Ich empfinde die Aufforderung, meine Edits ohne vorherige Diskussion zu löschen, als nicht förderlich für den Community Aspekt von OSM. Ihr seid euch ja gar nicht allen Fakten bewusst. 

Bitte seid spezifisch, mit welchen Relationen dupliziert sein sollen. Ich habe die Relationen basierend auf den Nummern auf den Wegweisern, die ich auf meiner Wanderung angetroffen habe, erstellt.  Hier findet ihr die Fotos sowie den GPX Track meiner Wanderung: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1Y9_DS1uS90v4Lqu7fA7bq4ZtD7R2imTh?usp=sharing 
Anhand der Zeitstempel der Fotos und des GPX Files sollte es möglich sein, die genauen Standorte zu ermitteln.

Liebe Grüsse
René
Jrachi (2026-02-24 08:10:08+00:00): Grazie della risposta.
La rete sentieristica nazionale è gestita da volontari CAI ed è vincolata in Piemonte da una legge regionale che definisce e vincola i percorsi.
Siamo a conoscenza che nel passato sono stati usati codici ref non aderenti al catasto.
Esiste poi anche la possibilità di trovare segnaletica di avvicinamento che non indicano affatto la presenza di un percorso .
Il drive che segnali non è accessibile a chiunque.
Per queste ragioni procedo con un revert.
Se nel futuro ti ritrovi con dati che coinvolgono percorsi a catasto, dotati di REI, sei pregato di avvisare il sottoscritto o la sezione CAI della zona.
Hai chiesto quali hai duplicato?
Tutte le relazioni meno 1. Non è necessario che ti indichi quale sono, dovresti essere in grado di vederlo da solo.

Ivo
Jrachi (2026-02-24 09:07:53+00:00): Ho cancellato le relazioni duplicanti percorsi con lo stesso codice.
Eliminato anche due percorsi il cui ref è sicuramente errato.
Grazie René per le foto che saranno usate per le correzioni necessarie.
Aggiungo una nota:
se sul guidepost oltre alle tabelle segnavia è presente una tabella località, questa, indica il nome della località e non è il nome del guidepost

Ivo
DAVIDE POZZO (2026-02-24 10:35:05+00:00): Ciao Renè ,  sono Pozzo il referente per la sentieristica del CAI e della Sosecp  per il territorio del VCO . I percorsi da te identificati sono oggetto della revisione in atto con IPLA (regione Piemonte) alcuni cartelli andranno rimossi e in alcuni casi sostituiti con quelli nuovi . I ref delle relazioni esistenti sono corretti e aggiornati mentre i cartelli sul percorso non sono aggiornati . Grazie per l'interessamento se vuoi aiutarci a mappare il territorio e rilevare i percorsi sei il benvenuto . Ciao Davide ps Ivo provvederà a cancellare e ripristinare la situazione.
Norbert Dichter (2026-02-22 18:00:52+00:00): Hello, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. Thank you for your contribution. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. Or just hit the Q-key.
Also please keep in mind: many buildings are very close but do not actually touch each other, try to map them close to each other without letting them connect or share nodes with each other, roads, or residential area outlines. In the iD web editor, holding down the "alt" key will keep nodes from "snapping" to each other and accidentally connecting.  Thanks so much for your contribution, Norbert 'Nodi' Dichter, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178906775
whitepanda (2026-02-23 11:15:35+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:178925729
MappingMore (2026-02-25 05:19:59+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:179018410
Pipeton (2026-02-23 09:10:20+00:00): Hola. Sé que es bastante difícil en este caso pero una de las buenas prácticas en OSM es conservar el historial, y bueno has borrado los edificios que ya había que yo puse.
De todas formas, se ha perdido un poco de información, porque yo los puse como apartamentos todos, y ahora con la importación son todos residenciales, que es menos específico.
Un saludo y estupendo trabajo en cualquier caso.
gpesquero (2026-03-28 15:51:18+00:00): Hello @Panio!! Have you confirmed that this road is indeed already open?
If so, we shall remove also the tag "note=This road is closed (as per July-2025) due to construction works" that I added 8 months ago.
maro21 (2026-02-25 15:50:42+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
NeisBot (2026-02-22 17:30:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/11360365786 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Architecture studio"
---
Na przykład, bardziej neutralna i obiektywna wersja Twojego tekstu mogłaby brzmieć: "Biuro architektoniczne"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-03-02 17:33:08+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/178908849
stasiu512 (2026-02-22 19:31:43+00:00): ten mięsny się na środku łąki znajduje? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8309063388#map=19/54.578499/18.494277
gscholz (2026-02-25 07:49:20+00:00): Hi AlhassaneDiallo,
your recent edits have left behind a lot of errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-8.73665&lat=11.44331&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges

As you may know, this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps. Can your please fix this?

An other hint: Please do not ignore the error warnings your editor shows you.

Kind regards
Guido
NeisBot (2026-02-22 17:39:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/1416349213 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Holiday cottage"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-03 05:33:02+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179284028
(No visible changes after review)
Szymson (2026-02-22 18:31:58+00:00): Po kiego grzyba duplikujesz obiekty które już istnieją?
muralito (2026-02-25 00:51:14+00:00): Gracias Alejandro.
La etiqueta building=yes (u otro especifico) no va en todo el predio, sino en el perímetro de la edificación.
AlejandroGarcia (2026-02-25 01:10:31+00:00): Ahh impecable, lo voy a revisar para tenerlo en cuenta. Muchas gracias.
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-23 02:14:29+00:00): These branch edits were reverted as they conflicted with verified data. Awaiting DWG review.
kubahahaha (2026-02-22 18:42:59+00:00): Jeszcze adresy trzeba zaimportować, dodałem notkę żeby nie zapomnieć, nawet nie patrzyłem czy są już w bazach urzędowych.
Dzięki!
OlasMapy (2026-03-27 12:57:12+00:00): z tego co byłem nie ma tu oznaczonego punktu widokowego
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-23 03:00:10+00:00): Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review.
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-23 03:00:05+00:00): Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review.
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-23 03:00:00+00:00): Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review.
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-23 02:59:56+00:00): Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review.
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-23 02:59:49+00:00): Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review.
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-23 02:59:45+00:00): Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review.
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-23 02:59:40+00:00): Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review.
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-23 02:59:35+00:00): Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review.
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-23 02:59:30+00:00): Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review.
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-23 02:52:02+00:00): This revert removed verified speed limit data based on Iranian urban traffic law. The information has been restored. Awaiting DWG review.
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-23 02:59:25+00:00): Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review.
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-23 02:59:18+00:00): Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review.
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-23 02:59:13+00:00): Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review.
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-23 02:25:55+00:00): Targeted revert removed verified edits of Mashahir Garden; restoring them. Awaiting DWG review.
Jonaes (2026-02-22 21:43:59+00:00): Hallo,
deine Änderungssätze sind meist sehr groß und umspannen mehrere unabhängige Orte und umfassen auch viel mehr, als im Changeset-Kommentar steht. Das macht das ganze sehr unübersichtlich.
In diesem Änderungssatz sehe ich z.B. eigentlich mindestens 5 Änderungssätze: Die Anschlussbahnen in Freital; die in Bischofswerda; die Anpassung eines POI in Übigau; die Anpassung an der Carolabrücke; der Supermarkt und das Wohngebiet in Ottendorf.
Speichere doch bitte einfach die Änderungen zu einem Ort direkt einzeln ab. Siehe auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:%C3%84nderungssatz#R%C3%A4umliche_Ausdehnung_von_%C3%84nderungss%C3%A4tzen

Zudem ist mir aufgefallen, dass du häufig als area:highway gemappte Flächen kommentar- und ersatzlos löschst. Ist das Absicht?

Viele Grüße
Jannis
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-23 02:59:07+00:00): Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review.
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-23 02:59:03+00:00): Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review.
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-23 02:58:59+00:00): Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review.
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-23 02:58:54+00:00): Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review.
MappingMore (2026-02-23 12:58:53+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:178942409
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-23 02:58:50+00:00): Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review.
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-23 02:58:45+00:00): Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review.
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-23 03:00:51+00:00): Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review.
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-23 02:58:40+00:00): Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review.
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-23 02:58:36+00:00): Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review.
Norbert Dichter (2026-02-22 20:59:25+00:00): Hello, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. Thank you for your contribution. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. Or just hit the Q-key.
Also please keep in mind: many buildings are very close but do not actually touch each other, try to map them close to each other without letting them connect or share nodes with each other, roads, or residential area outlines. In the iD web editor, holding down the "alt" key will keep nodes from "snapping" to each other and accidentally connecting.  Thanks so much for your contribution, Norbert 'Nodi' Dichter, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178910533
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-23 02:58:31+00:00): Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review.
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-23 02:58:26+00:00): Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review.
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-23 02:58:20+00:00): Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review.
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-23 02:58:14+00:00): Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review.
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-23 02:58:09+00:00): Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review.
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-23 02:58:04+00:00): Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review.
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-23 02:57:59+00:00): Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review.
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-23 02:57:53+00:00): Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review.
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-23 02:57:47+00:00): Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review.
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-23 02:57:42+00:00): Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review.
rarad74 (2026-02-22 19:35:19+00:00): Salut. Cele mai noi imagini din romania si zona Prahova implicit sunt Mapbox. Pe locul 2 ESRI Standard. Bing au peste 10 ani vechime.
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-23 02:37:54+00:00): Targeted revert removed verified height restriction of the multi-storey parking; restoring it. Awaiting DWG review.
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-23 02:57:37+00:00): Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review.
eggie (2026-02-22 18:29:53+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback    Wat is je bedoeling precies, want hier kunnen we bij OSM geen chocola van maken?
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-02-22 18:32:21+00:00): reverted by changeset #178911335
rempshaener (2026-02-22 20:23:21+00:00): Hallo,
ich habe mir zu diesem Hydranten die letzte Version angeschaut.
Dazu eine Anmerkung:
In das Feld "ref" kommt die Hydrantennummer. Die Nennweite kommt in das Feld fire_hydrant:diameter.
Viele Grüße
rempshaener (2026-02-22 20:25:20+00:00): Hallo,
der Hydrantentyp sollte noch ergänzt werden.
Danke für deinen Beitrag.
Viele Grüße
Rainero (2026-03-13 13:50:27+00:00): Revert mit changeset/179812138
(unzulässige Quelle)
arjunaraoc (2026-03-20 12:59:42+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check my update https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180158603
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178911540
AndyB_66 (2026-02-22 19:34:22+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
AndyB_66 (2026-02-23 12:31:25+00:00): Bitte beachten Sie die OSM-Regeln: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
AndyB_66 (2026-02-22 19:33:59+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
Frans S (2026-03-30 09:20:25+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please solve the issues shown by the issue triangle before you upload your mappings.
About the tagging of footway
Check this wiki article
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dfootway

Tag these kind of paths just as highway=path
Best regards
AndyB_66 (2026-02-22 19:33:30+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
AndyB_66 (2026-02-23 12:31:55+00:00): Bitte beachten Sie die OSM-Regeln: osm.wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
kapazao (2026-07-07 18:21:16+00:00): Hi, I have reverted the highway=busway at Plaza de Colón as it was incorrect because there is no separation from the other lanes and that was indicated in the secondary way.
You should look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=busway
Regards
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-23 02:57:32+00:00): Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review.
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-23 02:57:26+00:00): Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review.
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-23 02:57:18+00:00): Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review.
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-23 02:57:14+00:00): Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review.
AndyB_66 (2026-02-22 19:32:15+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-23 02:57:09+00:00): Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review.
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-23 02:57:04+00:00): Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review.
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-23 02:56:59+00:00): Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review.
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-23 02:56:54+00:00): Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review.
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-23 02:56:49+00:00): Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review.
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-23 02:56:44+00:00): Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review.
Frans S (2026-03-19 09:34:03+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please solve the issues / warnings shown by the issue triangle before you upload your mappings.
About the tagging of highways, traces as narrow as <2 mtr are not an unclassified highway. Use the tag: path.

To measure width in the iD editor, you can use the measurement panel by pressing [Ctrl]+[Shift]+[M] to turn it on, which allows you to see measurements as you draw. This feature helps you get a rough idea of the width of the features you are mapping.
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-23 02:56:36+00:00): Restoring valid edits that were removed in targeted revert. Awaiting DWG review.
Natfoot (2026-06-01 04:32:10+00:00): Is scenic bridge closed to all access or only vehicles?
jtrull (2026-06-01 17:14:06+00:00): To my knowledge there aren't any restrictions for non-motorized use.
Natfoot (2026-06-01 17:38:18+00:00): thanks
AndyB_66 (2026-02-22 19:30:17+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments