piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
nhacainohucomvc (2024-12-13 04:45:57+00:00): https://nohu.com.vc/
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1qevULDaqd9j3wKCTkpfwChyCZQmyf8ch
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Rew26-XbZ8d-TdV101RFNTgL24tcqUMBNEItULqcq7U/edit?usp=drivesdk
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1NacbUySXGqzmdJrMoLtzSRhmBrGoV-gk
https://sites.google.com/view/nohucomvc/home
https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer?mid=1zuMPBUc7BmkR4aeKy0TYOQfwTy7eY9g
https://nohucomvc.blogspot.com/2024/12/no-hu.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1CMz-Yt8dJQ
https://x.com/nohucomvc/status/1867148878086283733
https://creators.spotify.com/pod/show/nohucomvc/episodes/N-H-2025---Sn-Chi-Slot-Game-Hp-Dn-Nht-e2s82k2/a-abm86t5
https://www.scoop.it/topic/nha-cai-no-hu/p/4162894860/2024/12/12/no-hu-cong-game-slot-uy-tin-so-1-viet-nam
JAAS (2024-12-17 15:58:11+00:00): Hello Sai Aaryan,

I appreciate your help adding buildings in Guatemala on OSM. I have 2 comments to make these even better and more useful: please square-off the buildings, which are usually square (with few exceptions) - for this: after selecting the building press the `Q` key; please do not add the landuse=residential onto the buildings drawn.

Again, thank you and best regards,
JAAS
literan (2024-12-14 11:18:18+00:00): добрый день. Не надо писать в поле "название" номер дома
nevw (2024-12-13 07:23:54+00:00): Hi, you added the business to the building address point.
I separated the business tags from the building address point and then fixed the business tags.
BCNorwich (2024-12-13 06:37:53+00:00): Tags fixed.
aharvey (2024-12-23 00:24:47+00:00): looks good.
Carto'Cité (2025-11-09 10:55:58+00:00): Bonjour Philippe,
Tu avais ajouté cette piste https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1342359603 en décembre 2024 mais on voit en août 2025 et avant qu'elle n'existe pas. Je pense que c'est le double sens cyclable que tu as voulu décrire et lui est bien décrit depuis 2021 sur la route : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/499036577
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/503631135
Je corrige dans ce sens. N’hésite pas si tu as des questions :)
Charles de Carto’Cité
nhacaifb88comvc (2024-12-13 06:25:59+00:00): https://fb88.com.vc/
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1_OkaU34mI2zl2VWyCEbA-7tdS9da0zEA
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1-vqUh_XMsHb7qwLABvKKn2NwT045DMGOHEf57VMjwvA/edit?usp=drivesdk
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1LQIKEi67Lm6ccaGVfE5q7gNk3fmN4Rzd
https://sites.google.com/view/fb88comvc/home
https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer?mid=1lyV_Z40IRabYLo8qyRkluUq4AX942N0
https://nhacaifb88comvc.blogspot.com/2024/12/fb88.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i5v_76o_uWU
https://x.com/fb88comvc/status/1866469132952273361
https://creators.spotify.com/pod/show/fb88comvc/episodes/FB88---Tri-Nghim-C-Cc-Th-Thao-nh-Cao-e2s53f8/a-abm4ead
https://www.scoop.it/topic/nha-cai-fb88-by-nha-cai-fb88-90/p/4162857454/2024/12/10/tim-hieu-ve-fb88-nha-cai-uy-tin-va-an-toan
Kovoschiz (2024-12-13 09:03:14+00:00): There's no necessity to create `leisure=track` on a sidewalk. There's no physical separation between them. You didn't change the `route=foot` , and it's more for `=highway` . There's basically no `type=` for `=track` , and it's arguably a `route=foot` than `type=circuit`
Kovoschiz (2024-12-13 09:05:59+00:00): Furthermore, the whole cross-section is colored red on many sections. That means they are the same.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:21:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
Luzandro (2024-12-13 11:38:03+00:00): Hallo,

ich habe die urspr. Position des Weißenbacher Kogel wiederhergestellt, an der von dir angegebenen Position befindet sich offensichtlich kein Gipfel. In der basemap mag diese Stelle so beschriftet sein, aber diese enthält öfter Fehler und Ungenauigkeiten. Siehe auch https://maps.bev.gv.at/#/center/16.2235,48.0794/zoom/16/basis/karte/compare/epo_1/histmode/true
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160233274
sanchi (2024-12-20 21:05:57+00:00): Hola.
No has deshecho el cambio erróneo, has hecho desaparecer un vía entera del mapa.
Por favor solucionar los errores correctamente porque ya se aviso de este error en el conjunto de cambios anterior.
Por favor revisar el conjunto de cambios de la vía y corregirlo.
Un saludo
Raquel-garcia-import (2024-12-23 12:12:54+00:00): Mis disculpas, mediante mis primeras ediciones realicé la eliminación pensando que había eliminado una carretera que había creado por error, pero veo que me equivoqué. Siento mucho todos los problemas que esto haya causado.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-12-13 12:27:00+00:00): ops, miało być "aktualizacja sklepów, sklep z jajami"
mueschel (2024-12-14 10:26:45+00:00): Hi,
you used keys like "addr:flats10" in this import. Adding a number directly after the key is uncommon - it's much more usual to add it after a colon like 
addr:flats:10. Could you check & change that?
aharvey (2024-12-14 12:12:21+00:00): I raised this question at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:addr:flats#Exceeding_255_characters previously. Is there anything you can point me to that indicates the :2 :3 etc. key suffix is in use already for overflowing tag values?

On another note, thinking about this more, perhaps there is a different syntax we can come up with that represents these long addr:flats values in less characters?
aharvey (2024-12-14 12:22:36+00:00): I found https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12419076028 as one feature imported with addr:flats10. Could we move this discussion to the community forum or a GitLab issue at https://gitlab.com/alantgeo/vicmap2osm/-/blob/master/README.md or the import page talk, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Import/Catalogue/Vicmap_Address
mueschel (2024-12-14 12:32:52+00:00): Here's the wiki entry about long values in general:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multiple_values#Numbered_suffix_in_key

You can always check Taginfo for specific tag:
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/addr:flats#similar
If you check e.g. addr:flats:1 you see that is in use since 2015, although this is not very common for obvious reasons. When looking at other tags, you'll find many without the colon - but as described in the Wiki these are mostly generated by old imports and where never properly discussed and documented.

I don't think there is any way to shorten the values, the numbers I see are just too diverse.
TheSwavu (2024-12-14 22:21:47+00:00): Hi mueschel,

Would you please move this discussion the the OSM Community forum. Either https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/122863 or the original discussion https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/122628 

Thanks.
TheSwavu (2024-12-14 22:25:55+00:00): Or if you want to go old school there is the talk-au mail list https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/2021-May/014622.html
aharvey (2024-12-17 22:44:05+00:00): discussion moved to https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/vicmap-address-import-progress/122863/4
mcliquid (2024-12-14 14:12:33+00:00): Hi, oneway=yes ist bei Kreisverkehren redundant:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction=roundabout?uselang=en#The_roundabout_itself
-2147483648 (2024-12-18 20:38:32+00:00): Hi mcliquid, danke für den Hinweis.

Das war mir aber bewusst. Ich habe das oneway=yes nur bei den Kreiseln hinzugefügt wo auch die
Einfahrten nach Fahrtrichtung getrennt gemappt sind. Ich finde es so
schöner weil dann für den ganzen Kreisverkehr explizit angegeben ist
dass es eine Einbahn ist. Oder umgekehrt bei Kreiseln ohne
richtungsgetrennt gemappte Einfahrten implizit für den ganzen Kreisel.

Aber das ist meine persönliche Meinung.

Darauf gekommen bin ich übrigends weil in Widnau viele Strassen mit
oneway=no gemappt sind, was ja auch der Default wäre :-)
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-18 04:06:17+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165094911
soliMM (2024-12-13 17:19:39+00:00): I have reverted changes you have made to road classification in this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160255103

Please do not change classification of the roads without further discussion with community. I urge you to establish contact with community as soon as possible, to clear many things up, in order to prevent further escalation.
Piskvor (2024-12-13 10:31:03+00:00): Benjamin Rosenstein je tu taky připomínán - v terénu tedy zmíněn není? Zvláštní, prozkoumám proč.

https://www.holocaust.cz/databaze-obeti/obet/118788-benjamin-rosenstein/
Gobik (2024-12-13 20:25:37+00:00): Benjamin Rosenstein je zde
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2820087191
Piskvor (2024-12-14 10:46:23+00:00): Aha, děkuju. V terénu se mi jeho stolperstein nedařilo najít.
sahshoor (2024-12-13 09:53:45+00:00): Narrogin is outside Transperth's service area.
fortera_au (2024-12-14 00:24:05+00:00): Hi, you've removed all tags from these stops but kept the nodes there. If these stops exist then only the Transperth details should be removed. If the stops don't exist at all anymore the nodes should be deleted.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160236132
sahshoor (2024-12-14 12:21:22+00:00): I thought I'd leave them (for now) after messaging the original creator in case they want to correct the tags. (I don't know how or what was actually found at these locations, I only saw Bing imagery was tagged on the change set 155088180.)

Perhaps I should instead:
- Revert and wait a while for original author to respond (though I can't imagine how a "Transperth" bus stop could be in Narrogin)?
- Or just delete nodes?
fortera_au (2024-12-15 01:11:57+00:00): If they're definitely not Transperth stops (and you can confirm that somehow) then I'd remove the tags that reference Transperth but that's it. It's entirely possible that there is bus stops there still, just not Transperth ones.
cubbe8 (2024-12-13 23:50:53+00:00): You used old imagery
MelancholicSlav (2024-12-14 02:27:17+00:00): Yeah you're right, thanks for realigning the crosswalks to the current layout. I'm assuming you have a GPS track? It doesn't seem like there is any imagery from 2024
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-05 17:19:50+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11710465150/history has app_operated = yes that was added in this edit
What app_operated=yes means here? Have you wanted to mark that you can control it with app in some way but app may be necessary or not? For example shop where you can scan and pay with app, without going through a traditional line. Or is it for objects where you need an app to use them at all? Then maybe app_operated=only would be better?

Note, this key seems undocumented on wiki, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Key:app_operated and
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-05 17:22:49+00:00): welp, this page actually exists now, I forgot to check it and I forgot that I tried to document it (feel free to check its correctness!)

sorry for last sentence being wrong
FajrAl (2026-07-18 00:13:00+00:00): Hi, is Bird's Nest really a hotel?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3322669511
danieldegroot2 (2024-12-13 15:43:33+00:00): Hey ,

Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap.

If you need any help or want to chat, you can join the OSM Ireland community on Telegram
https://t.me/+VNKHmdvvs3qOGTq4

Other contact channels are listed here, but may be less active.
https://openstreetmap.community/?map=52.65072,-7.25232&zoom=5.21

---

Regarding your changes in this changeset;
They look okay. It seems you know how to square features already (right click => square, or "Q" key) and have added a capacity tag.
A few values weren't correct but this is understandable. In the future, try verifying with street level imagery (see below).
The areas ended up with the 'parking space' tag instead of the 'streetside parking' so be careful what you choose/copy.
(If you tried selecting a parking area to copy tags you likely ran into this issue. It has been resolved and will be released at a later time.
https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/10320
)

In the iD editor (the browser editor you are using), go to the right sidebar and look at these menus:
- Layers: For the Kilkenny city area, use Esri Clarity. Regular Esri is newer, but less well aligned. It can be used outside Kilkenny's ring road.
Bing is used in other areas of the country, e.g. east of the river Barrow.
- Data Layers: Below the Layers menu is the Data Layers menu. If you scroll down, it lists street level imagery. For Kilkenny city area, Mapillary and Panoramax are available (some of which is duplicate). Elsehwere, only Bing Streetside might be available.

OpenStreetMap has permission to use these layers. Proprietary/copyright sources are prohibited unless OpenStreetMap has explicit permission to use them. Google Maps / Street View are explicitly prohibited by the way.

Furthermore, have a look at this list of editor applications. Feel free to try them out as well.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Editors#Most_used_Editors
JOSM is especially useful for more advanced editing.

Happy mapping.

Regards,

Daniel
TaiB2C (2025-01-29 12:46:49+00:00): You should use the form of `@username@mastodon.homeserver` if you want a complete reference to a specific Mastodon account without the URL; as your edit removed reference to the correct Mastodon homeserver.  (Not everyone uses the main/popular `mastodon.social` server.)
mueschel (2025-01-29 15:13:07+00:00): Right. I'll fix that later.
danieldegroot2 (2024-12-13 15:51:29+00:00): Hey Learscail,

Try using the proper aerial imagery layer for the Kilkenny city area.
Don't worry, it is a common mistake.
See my reply to your first changeset.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160237685

(Or, click your profile picture in the top right and go to Profile => Edit history to see your changesets)

---

This changeset has been reverted in
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160248253

You can see your changes here
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=160238020

Regards,

Daniel
VA00 (2025-09-01 16:45:31+00:00): Szlak dolnośląski w małopolsce? Czy ten szlak w ogóle istnieje?
emarv (2025-09-01 18:31:36+00:00): Rzeczywiście błąd w linku źródła.
https://malopolska.szlaki.pttk.pl/289-pttk-malopolska-chelmek-fabryka-pkp-stawy-bielnik
VA00 (2025-09-01 18:59:33+00:00): Czy ten szlak faktycznie istnieje w terenie? Jest to wysoce wątpliwe, został wielokrotnie przerwany, m.in. remontem linii kolejowej 5 lat temu.  Mam Deja Vu, jakby ta dyskusja już się raz odbyła, szlak został skasowany i pojawił się na nowo. W jego historii nie ma żadnych zmian oprócz Twojej. Skąd wiedza o szlaku?
emarv (2025-09-01 19:48:51+00:00): Oprócz powyższej strony PTTK jest on również tutaj: https://www.slaskie.travel/route/11812/gliwice--jaworzno-krawedziowy-gop wraz ze zdjęciami oznaczeń przy stawie Bielik (oznaczenia równoległe szlaków czerwony/zielony). Jeżeli masz wątpliwości, usuń tę relację.
VA00 (2025-09-03 06:56:22+00:00): Co miałby w tej kwestii zmieniać przypadkowy link z internetu? Tam nie ma nawet daty, artykuł może mieć 15 lat! Staw Belnik jest od kilku miesięcy wystawiony na sprzedaż. Doprecyzujmy: czy wstawiłeś relację BEZ przejścia szlaku, lub choćby jego fragmentu, kierując się wyłącznie przedatowanymi  materiałami propagandowymi/promocyjnymi samorządów z internetu?   Jeżeli tak, jest to fatalna praktyka. Podobnie fatalną praktyką jest kasowanie relacji porzuconych szlaków. Bo wcześniej czy później ktoś z drugiego końca Polski znajdzie jakąś mapkę w internecie i wrysuje od nowa. Tak zapewne zrobiłeś. Lepiej jest powoli degradować relację poprzez usunięcie tagu network i dodanie state=abandoned.
emarv (2025-09-03 07:13:52+00:00): state=abandoned - zgadza się, tak robię. Usunięcie to skrót myślowy.
VA00 (2025-11-20 13:59:41+00:00): Dziś przejechałem całość. Szlak po prostu nie istnieje. Na całej trasie wypatrzyłem, korzystając z braku liści, 4 ZAMALOWANE szarą farbą pozostałości znaków. Pirackie przejście przez tory to proszenie się o wypadek - od miesiąca jeździ tu kilkanaście pociągów IC. Po licznych wycinkach ścieżki miejscami zaorano. 

Odgrzebałem korespondencję z PTTK sprzed 4 lat. Już wtedy szlak był skasowany. Nie mam pojęcia jak znowu trafił do Geoportalu. Najlepiej byłoby całą relację skasować, ale zapewne znowu ktoś kto tu nigdy nie był wrysuje go od zera opierając się na bliżej niekreślonych źródłach.
emarv (2025-11-20 14:47:40+00:00): Dziękuję. Dodasz abandoned=yes czy ja mam to zrobić? Dobrze było dodać też note, z twojego komentarza
VA00 (2025-11-20 18:49:43+00:00): Zmieniłem relację i napisałem do PTTK aby usunęli szlak z geoportalu. Tag abandoned tu nie pasuje, bo szlak został skasowany celowo, o czym świadczą znaki zamalowane celowo.
danieldegroot2 (2024-12-13 15:56:31+00:00): Hey Learscail,

I have realigned these trees to the proper aerial imagery layer for you.
If anything looks odd, that is because the map has not fully updated for you yet.
Try refreshing your cache with
(Ctrl +)(Shift +)F5
depending on your browser.
It may take some time and a few refreshes before the map updates.

Ref this changeset
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160247176

You can see the changes here
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=160247176

Regards,

Daniel
danieldegroot2 (2024-12-13 15:51:32+00:00): Hey Learscail,

Try using the proper aerial imagery layer for the Kilkenny city area.
Don't worry, it is a common mistake.
See my reply to your first changeset.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160237685

(Or, click your profile picture in the top right and go to Profile => Edit history to see your changesets)

---

This changeset has been reverted in
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160248253

You can see your changes here
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=160238380

Regards,

Daniel
danieldegroot2 (2024-12-13 15:51:34+00:00): Hey Learscail,

Try using the proper aerial imagery layer for the Kilkenny city area.
Don't worry, it is a common mistake.
See my reply to your first changeset.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160237685

(Or, click your profile picture in the top right and go to Profile => Edit history to see your changesets)

---

This changeset has been reverted in
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160248253

You can see your changes here
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=160238398

Regards,

Daniel
flohoff (2024-12-13 11:17:02+00:00): Moin,
danke das du es gefunden hast. Aber construction=* und highway=* sind unterschiedliche dinge. 

Solange da ein construction=* drauf ist werden die wege nicht im Routing benutzt (Jedenfalls von einigen Routing engines) 

highway=construction fällt bei allen routingengines raus.

Also wenn das Befahrbar ist ist das richtig das construction=trunk runter ist. 

Ich habe jedenfalls in der routingüberwachung einen schwenk des Routings gesehen:

https://osm.zz.de/routeqa/?rid=831371,929336

Flo
Авточехлы новыйсалон рф (2024-12-13 16:16:06+00:00): Пн 10:00 - 19:00
Вт 10:00 - 19:00
Ср 10:00 - 19:00
Чт 10:00 - 19:00
Пт 10:00 - 19:00
Сб 10:00 - 17:30
Вс 10:00 - 17:30
user_22290446 (2024-12-13 10:10:33+00:00): Bonjour il faudrait supprimer la croix, je me suis trompé de localisation, j'ai refait une demande pour la mettre plus haut dans la rue
eggie (2024-12-13 11:24:53+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
divaddivag (2024-12-13 14:57:58+00:00): Bonjour nlehuby,

À l'exception des noeuds ou si je ne suis pas en mesure de découper lorsqu'il y en a 2+,  je ne rajoute pas le/les tags capacity sur le 'parking_space' puisque c'est un objet qui est par défaut au singulier. Y-a-t-il un intérêt à ajouter 'capacity' et 'capacity:disabled' systématiquement et qui m'aurait échappé? David
nlehuby (2024-12-13 15:41:27+00:00): Bonjour David,

La première phrase du wiki indique "La propriété amenity=parking_space sert à cartographier une ou plusieurs places de parking contigües ayant le même rôle dans un parking", donc c'est parfaitement ok d'avoir un seul objet (noeud ou zone) pour représenter plus d'une place. (source : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:amenity=parking%20space?uselang=fr)

En l'occurrence, je réutilise ces données pour qualifier l'accessibilité réelle de ces places, en considérant notamment leurs dimensions : dans le cas d'une place cartographiée en zone (chemin fermé), je calcule la largeur et la longueur de la place à partir de la géométrie. Mais du coup, si l'objet OSM est un regroupement de places et pas une unique place, la conclusion à tirer n'est pas vraiment la même... Donc ces tags capacity me permettent de fiabiliser le processus.

Noémie
divaddivag (2024-12-13 16:19:18+00:00): Merci pour ta réponse express et plus bas la page 'Si le parking_space représente plus qu'un emplacement de stationnement (ou quelque chose d'équivalent), utilisez capacity=* pour définir le nombre d'emplacements présents. La valeur par défaut pour capacity=* est "1" si ce n'est pas précisé autrement.'

Je n'ai pas une lecture légaliste du wiki et je souhaitais juste connaitre les raisons pour lesquelles il fallait systématiser 'capacity'  et 'capacity:disabled' quelque soit le nombre de stationnements. Rien de plus :-)
nlehuby (2024-12-14 08:31:04+00:00): Hello,

pas de soucis, la question est légitime !

Je considère bien la valeur par défaut quand le tag est absent, mais c'est une source d'incertitude : tu ne sais jamais si ça veut vraiment dire qu'il n'y a qu'une place, ou s'il y en a potentiellement plusieurs et le contributeur n'a pas connaissance du tag, n'y a pas pensé, n'a pas un outil qui lui permet de l'ajouter facilement, etc

Donc je préfère que ça soit explicite, pour lever le doute.
Eebie (2024-12-18 21:33:03+00:00): Weg 160239033 (Op de Meerstraat-Brug Terrillaan) deel van knooppuntenfietsroutes worden teruggezet naar fietspad zoals het al jaren was. Overigens gebruiken wij in België "track" enkel voor onverharde wegen.  Zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Belgium/Conventions/Highways
BREKO (2024-12-19 13:19:44+00:00): Overigens gebruiken wij in België "track" enkel voor onverharde wegen. . Zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Belgium/Conventions/Highways
> bedankt. Wist ik niet. Ik zal ook zeker eens nagaan als ik dat elders ook moet aanpassen.

Ik kom wel vaker verharde paden/routes tegen die wel door fietsers/voetgangers gebruikt worden maar waar de correcte verkeersborden (die er officieel een voet of fietspad van maken) ontbreken. Zoals hier het geval is. Zijn hier ook concretere richtlijnen over?
Eebie (2024-12-21 17:45:19+00:00): Er zijn geen concrete richtlijnen voor al er geen duidelijke verkeersborden staan. Dan is het kijken naar andere aanduidingen. Het weg/pad die hoofdzakelijk door fietsers wordt gebruikt en waar verkeerspalen de toegang voor motorvoertuigen belet en/of die deel uitmaken van een fietsroutenetwerk is dan een fietspad of een gecombineerd voet- en fietspad. Een pad waar fietsers niet verboden zijn is geen footway maar een path (bij footway zijn fietsers verboden tenzij expliciet toegestaan). Veilige wegen voor fietsers aanduiden als fietspad is belangrijk voor routeplanner apps. Als wegen niet expliciet voor fietsers aangeduid worden op OSM gaan sommige routeplanners die ook vermijden en fietsers langs drukkere wegen sturen.