piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
multimodaal (2026-01-24 08:26:45+00:00): Hoi, hier is een hiking-routerelatie gemaakt met maar 1 lid, een korte footway met private access. 
En de changesetomschrijving is "Automatically generated summary"
Een foutje misschien?   
Bedankt voor je reactie!
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19693515
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-09 08:41:18+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12299985366
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13204427667
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13204427668
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13204427669

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
stadtnavi Herrenberg (2025-10-14 08:02:24+00:00): This is a duplette of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24491733#map=19/48.592194/8.854321. I suggest deleting this entry (or the other, but before the additional information like contact information should be transferred). Thx
timmito (2025-10-14 21:52:36+00:00): Hallo stadtnavi Herrenberg, für die Dopplung von amenity=school bist du doch selbst verantwortlich. Du hast am 13.10.2025 am Schulgebäude ein amenity=school ergänzt, obwohl das Schulgelände bereits separat erfasst ist.

History Schule: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/678610356/history
History Schulgebäude: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24491733/history

Vorher war jahrelang alles in Ordnung. Ich habe lediglich den short_name der Schule ergänzt.

Zum Unterschied zwischen Schulgelände und Schulgebäude siehe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity=school

Es gilt die Regel: One feature, one OSM element https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Ein_Objekt,_ein_OSM-Element

Daher bitte vom Schulgebäude das Attribut amenity=school wieder löschen.
stadtnavi Herrenberg (2025-10-15 06:29:30+00:00): Hallo timmito, da hast du recht, das tut mir Leid. Ich habe amenity=school vom Gebäude wieder entfernt und die Kontaktinformationen für das Schulgelände übernommen. Vielen Dank für die hilfreichen Links. Ich hoffe, so passt es jetzt wieder.
MaxR_6429 (2025-11-14 13:39:58+00:00): Merci pour l'ajout de ces caméras
Udarian (2025-10-09 12:10:49+00:00): according to changeset 172892203 this section of service road does not exist any longer, can you please double check this.
subham_lyft (2025-10-10 13:27:19+00:00): Hi, Udarian 
My name is Shubham and I’m a mapper in the OSM team at Lyft. About my edits: The recent road I added is supported by Lyft-owned aerial imagery (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1N_bsXbrxEU537l_SPqjFZwZ8-S-u2OX3/view?usp=sharing) from May 2025 and Lyft-owned street-level imagery https://drive.google.com/file/d/1gp8xw_pw22oh0_e3ny3B_CzW7HlydLS9/view?usp=sharing) from December 2024. Both clearly depict an access point between the DoubleTree Hotel and the adjacent mall. If you have more recent or alternative sources, please feel free to amend our changes if necessary.
Happy Mapping!!

Best Regards,
Shubham
angdev (2025-10-09 09:31:04+00:00): Da open data Comune di Lecce risulta area cani per sgambamento
eggie (2025-10-09 14:38:29+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback De dubbel getagde naam heb ik verwijderd
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
MaciekMma (2025-10-09 12:53:46+00:00): thank u
NeisBot (2025-10-09 09:44:35+00:00): Hi Luis28042012, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 98% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 96 landuse(')

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=173040547
NeisBot (2025-10-09 09:46:34+00:00): Hi Luis28042012, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 94% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 5 highway(s)
- 2 building(s)
- 121 landuse(')

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=173040667
Taya_S (2025-10-09 11:02:50+00:00): Reverted Farming Simulator edits

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173044079
NeisBot (2025-10-09 09:52:35+00:00): Hi Luis28042012, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 96% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 1 highway(s)
- 5 building(s)
- 115 landuse(')

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=173040936
Taya_S (2025-10-09 11:10:06+00:00): You genuinely added lots of details to this area. It is a shame your edits are such a mixture of fake and real features. Othwerise not everything would have needed to be reverted.
Mechowskyy (2025-10-09 10:05:13+00:00): Dodałem również istniejącą nieformalnie część wsi.
Szymson (2025-10-09 14:50:05+00:00): Skąd ta data 2025-10-20?
fghj753 (2025-10-09 17:18:01+00:00): Hi, I'm curious if you are affiliated with users Ralftora and PiretS, who have also started mapping parking spaces this week?
0svald (2025-10-09 17:59:19+00:00): Hi, yes we are. We are doing a uni course where we have to map out parking spaces in various areas in Tallinn.
fghj753 (2025-10-09 18:16:01+00:00): Ok, thanks for clarifying. Edu õpingutega.
Kayo_33 (2025-10-30 11:29:09+00:00): Oh, that's cool trivia! Good luck!

Noteworthy is that when adding separate parking spaces, iD editor raises errors regarding tags on adjacent ways. For example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?note=4779348#map=19/59.404757/24.724208
nevw (2025-10-09 12:11:07+00:00): Most of the rest of your edits needed phone or opening hours tags re-formatted due to syntax errors. Please see my earlier links and map accordingly.
Arcas88 (2025-10-09 12:54:19+00:00): Hi, I will look at getting it all correct tomorrow, thank you :)
nevw (2025-10-09 13:43:52+00:00): all fixed
Penegal (2026-02-14 10:48:27+00:00): Bonjour, Dblanzac ; comme on se retrouve ! ;-)

Je remarque que vous avez ajouté des noms d’aires sur les nœuds `highway=motorway_junction` des sorties qui y mènent : ceci est erroné, dans le sens où le nom affiché sur le panneau est celui de l’aire (`highway=rest_area` ou `highway=services`), et donc pas le nom de la sortie en elle-même.
Penegal (2026-02-14 11:32:14+00:00): Désolé pour l’oubli du prénom, Dorian ; c’est le genre d’info qui s’efface rapidement de mon esprit… ;-)
Udarian (2025-10-09 12:28:38+00:00): looking at these roads on Bing aerial I personally think that these were better tagged as a alley as they seem to be only for parking to residents of the buildings along these roads, why was this changed?
subham_lyft (2025-10-10 13:43:41+00:00): Hi, Udarian
My name is Shubham and I’m Ravinder’s teammate. We are mappers on the OSM team at Lyft.
Thank you for your feedback. Regarding my edits: I classified the way as residential because it appeared to be located at the front of the buildings. According to the OSM Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Dalley), an alley (or alleyway) is typically a narrow highway=service road situated between properties, primarily used for accessing rear entrances, back gardens, fire exits, or storage areas. Since these roads are usually located at the back and this particular one seems to be in front, I chose residential. Unfortunately, I don’t have any street level imagery to confirm it. If you have street level sources or alternative sources, please feel free to amend our changes if necessary.
I apologize for that and for any inconvenience these edits may have caused.

Happy Mapping!

Best Regards,
Shubham
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-10-09 11:49:20+00:00): Hi! 
The geometry was correct by following the theoretical gore. What was wrong and what kind of error were you trying to fix? Thanks!
BR_pebble (2025-10-10 10:08:11+00:00): Hi ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy, Thanks for reaching out. 
Towards the northeast, the service way 1212714833 was connecting two residential roads and was only about 1 meter in length. I thought of maintaining the same configuration created by you, but extend the segment, but now I see you have updated it. Thank you for making the corrections. Anyway, I should have left a more descriptive changeset instead of the default one, to avoid confusion.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-10-10 13:01:20+00:00): Thanks!
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-10-10 13:02:47+00:00): In Quebec, when we validate and complete the data in a specific area like this one, we are adding very precise data, so very short segments are often created. This is not an error. Thanks!
Pookave (2025-10-18 15:38:18+00:00): Bonjour, il semble que ce nœud soit édité très souvent pour mettre à jour les horaires. Y a-t-il un blocage sur cette édition ?
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2025-10-20 07:58:39+00:00): Bonjour, 
non pas de blocage à ce sujet, mais effectivement, ce magasin modifie régulièrement ses horaires. Bonne journée. Alain
soshial (2026-02-01 09:59:55+00:00): Hey, thanks a lot for adding this route, I went there yesterday and it was beautiful! I have added more paths/tracks and fixed some paths that you added. (Is it possible to check out how it looked before your edit?)

One question, why didn't you make the relation a loop one but added a second relation to Krizna gora?
mk2k22 (2026-02-01 14:45:28+00:00): I think you can use osmcha.org or similar websites to check that, but I'm not sure how to use that properly. What exactly did you fix of the paths I had previously added?

As for the loop, at the time of adding it I thought I'd only add the waymarked relation with name to the top of the 3 mountain "peaks" and then tag the remaining section merely as a marked relation (without name), but on second thoughts maybe I'll just change it into a loop indeed.
mk2k22 (2026-02-01 14:54:51+00:00): PS.: I'm glad you found my mapping useful. :)
silversurfer83 (2025-10-09 17:07:00+00:00): Hi there :)

you recently made some edits that look

a) kinda mechanical

b) cover very large areas

both should be avoided.

For b) please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

cheers
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173044016
okainov (2025-10-09 17:14:39+00:00): Hi @silversurfer83

While I understand why this might have been flagged, I'd like to highlight that I already splitted the changesets to geographical scopes (and this change in particular is just around some part of Europe and affecting less than 20 OSM elements)
And the intention is to unify seldom used tags into something common. 

Of course I have double-checked the change before commiting.
Ansofter (2025-10-12 22:06:32+00:00): @okainov

With all due respect, limiting it to “some part of Europe” is still far too broad.
Niklaus Weiss (2025-10-09 11:07:49+00:00): Pursuant to the principles of good practice governing the naming of entities within the OpenStreetMap project, the general rule provides that the name in common and official use by the local population at the relevant location shall be applied on the map (see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Good_practice)

In accordance with this principle, it is an undisputed fact that all competent institutions, as well as the vast majority of inhabitants of this federal unit within the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, use the designation “Hercegbosanska županija.” This nomenclature is consistently applied by official and legally constituted bodies, including the Government of the Canton, the Cantonal Assembly, and other organs of public administration and civil services (see: https://www.vladahbz.com/ ; https://www.skupstinahbz.com/show_page/11/o-zupaniji ; https://gss-hbz.com/ ).

Furthermore, and of decisive importance, the Constitution of the Canton explicitly and formally establishes “Hercegbosanska županija” as the official constitutional name of the canton (see: https://www.paragraf.ba/propisi/hercegbosanska-zupanija/ustav-hercegbosanske-zupanije.html ). Accordingly, any alternative designation would be inconsistent with the constitutional order and contrary to the prevailing legal and factual practice within the territory of the Canton.
dENdoMania (2025-10-09 13:15:43+00:00): It is not true that all institutions use the name "Hercegbosanska županija”.

Ministry of Internal Affairs
https://www.mupk10.gov.ba/

Canton Court
https://ksud-livno.pravosudje.ba

Canton Prosecutors Officer
https://kt-livno.pravosudje.ba/vstvfo/H/107
Niklaus Weiss (2025-10-09 13:45:29+00:00): Thank you for your comment and the constructive discussion. Indeed, not all institutions fall under this category, as certain competencies are vested in federal agencies. However, two of the three branches of democratic authority do. The designation Hercegbosanska županija is used by the majority of media outlets operating in the region and by more than two-thirds of its population. My position is that, in accordance with established OpenStreetMap practices, it is appropriate to employ the terminology that is most commonly recognized and used within the relevant territorial jurisdiction.
ika-chan! (2025-10-11 03:31:39+00:00): The filter roads at 38.851669,21.336762 were removed because Esri World Imagery disproves its existence. What is the source for all those filter roads you've added?
Comino (2025-10-09 18:40:44+00:00): Hi,

In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes".

Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag !
Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead.

For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Merchants#tagging-guidance
and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bitcoin

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
https://btcmap.org/tagger/6794624
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-10-19 10:03:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 173483123 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unlikely 'grassland' in India by a one-day-only mapper
maraf24 (2026-06-26 13:19:55+00:00): Wejście do klatki, a nie noexit.
ika-chan! (2025-10-10 13:17:19+00:00): Map User Grecce, why do you keep adding filter roads that do not exist according to Esri Imagery? Please get in touch with us about this and your past edits at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/report-vandalism-or-concerns-about-edits-here/4223/222
ika-chan! (2025-10-10 13:24:40+00:00): Sorry, but I also forgot to mention my concern about fake junction layouts as well. The DWG has asked us to try and urge you change your editing practices, but this is something that I cannot handle alone due to so many real life issues.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-10-19 10:03:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 173483123 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unlikely 'grassland' in India by a one-day-only mapper
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-10-19 10:03:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 173483123 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unlikely 'grassland' in India by a one-day-only mapper
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-10-19 10:03:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 173483123 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unlikely 'grassland' in India by a one-day-only mapper
user_5359 (2025-10-09 18:44:46+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Wollt ihr eventuell etwas mehr als nur den Namen (wer oder was seid, Kontaktmöglickeiten) hinzufügen?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-10-19 10:03:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 173483123 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unlikely 'grassland' in India by a one-day-only mapper
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-10-19 10:03:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 173483123 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unlikely 'grassland' in India by a one-day-only mapper
SomeoneElse (2025-10-10 11:25:33+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
I've just noticed https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1436669796 - does it actually match what is actually on the ground here?  It does not look like it from the imagery.
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-10-19 10:03:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 173483123 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unlikely 'grassland' in India by a one-day-only mapper
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-10-19 10:03:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 173483123 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unlikely 'grassland' in India by a one-day-only mapper
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-10-19 10:03:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 173483123 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unlikely 'grassland' in India by a one-day-only mapper
ilias_ (2025-10-09 14:24:28+00:00): Le point en question que tu as edit n'est pas le tribunal administratif, c'est la mahkama du pacha. Le tribunal administratif est l'immeuble plus en bas a gauche.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/167628017
NeisBot (2025-10-09 12:00:38+00:00): Hi Katta Saikiran, welcome and thanks for your contribution!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

Based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Added Muslim grave yard amenity"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-10-19 10:03:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 173483123 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unlikely 'grassland' in India by a one-day-only mapper
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-10-19 10:03:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 173483123 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unlikely 'grassland' in India by a one-day-only mapper
Danysan95 (2025-10-16 12:16:50+00:00): Occhio quando crei i marciapiedi separati, che a volte (come in questo caso) i marciapiedi sono già mappati sulla strada stessa con tag come sidewalk=both (descritti su https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sidewalks#How_to_map ), in questi casi se mappi il marciapiede separato e non modifichi il tag esistente crei un duplicato. Ho corretto in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173361839 i tag sulle strade specificando che i marciapiedi ci sono ma sono mappati separatamente.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-21 17:51:25+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13204703275/history has shop = chicken_shop that was added in this edit
shop=chicken_shop ? is it seling living chickens, raw chicken meat as food, products for chickens like animal feed? Something else?
DaveF (2025-10-10 13:07:03+00:00): Welcome to OSM.
I've reverting your changeset. The railway=station node is distinct from entrance tags, of which there may be many, scattered well away from the actual station, especially in London. Station nodes for 2 platform, two track station the node should be placed between the tracks & near to the middle of the platforms.

Is there a building with barriers & ticket office etc?:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dtrain_station
Cebderby (2025-10-10 15:42:33+00:00): For info, there are entrances at both ends, both more or less equal status and mapped in some detail. At both ends, the entrances share parts of the buildings with offices etc above, the station being underground.  At the north end, even the ticket hall is underground, under the Conductor pub.  At the south end, a central part of the ground floor of that building is dedicated to the station.
The station node used to be at the south end of Fleet Place which was definitely confusing, but the current mid-platform location is probably the best we can do.
jumplondon (2025-10-10 17:59:47+00:00): Hey, I posted a thread on the community forum to continue this discussion - it raises enough questions that I don't think the comments section of the changeset can be a productive place to discuss them or document the answers. https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/problems-with-the-map-of-city-thameslink-station/136698
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-09 18:24:56+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/380235091

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
_PBl_ (2025-10-10 06:53:51+00:00): Dziękuję za zwrócenie uwagi. Pozdrawiam
ika-chan! (2025-10-14 08:15:14+00:00): I recommend that you only map ways that exist according to Bing or Esri. If you are actually surveying Greece, please set source=* to "Survey (YYYY-MM-DD)".
karr4s (2025-10-15 18:23:15+00:00): Bonjour,
Techniquement, le parc est la partie de gauche. Idéalement, il faudrait diviser le landuse en deux, au niveau du mur qui sépare le parc du jardin de la maison. J'aurais bien voulu le faire moi-même mais je ne suis pas encore assez à l'aise avec JOSM ^^'
solcarlus5 (2025-10-16 14:39:42+00:00): Normalement j'ai fait la distinction (en espérant que j'ai pas fait n'importe quoi, je suis pas encore super à l'aise non plus)
karr4s (2025-10-16 14:55:52+00:00): ça m'a l'air parfait. Merci. :)
mueschel (2025-10-12 11:14:43+00:00): Why this change? Using capital letters in 'ref' and 'name' for the name of the operator is very common. For 2/3 letter abbreviations it also prevents conflicts with language codes in name tags.
user_5359 (2025-10-12 11:25:34+00:00): Because the misspelling reF:kmk was registered on a certain page https://osm.mueschelsoft.de/taginfo/newkeys.htm and taginfo.osm.org then additionally displayed a ratio of 1 to 2 between the two keys ref:KMK and ref:kmk (yes, with cross-checking in the same area; I did not note the exact values). Do you have any evidence that this correction contains an error?
mueschel (2025-10-12 11:34:43+00:00): 'name:kmal' didn't exist until a few days ago and 'ref:kmal' was used a lot less than 'ref:KMAL'.
DaveF (2025-10-09 12:46:56+00:00): The wall is still there:
https://maps.app.goo.gl/tzp6JcfoPCijfeAp9

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/457668182/history/3
letsridebikes (2025-10-10 11:52:51+00:00): Apologies, think that was a mistake on my part. Partially reverted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173090678#map=19/51.379536/-2.363897