piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
BubbaJuice (2024-07-07 18:51:19+00:00): Hello,

Please do not remove detail from the map. I will be reverting this changeset.
CurlingMan13 (2024-07-07 19:40:59+00:00): Adding discussion from our messages so it is public.  

This area is now a preserve.  It looks like someone had tried to readd the golf course prior to my edits and I re-removed the golf course addition.  Feel free to edit back to what it was prior to then and how you see fit.  Happy mapping and thanks for the pleasant discussion.  :)

https://www.conservationfund.org/projects/preservation-of-the-former-vistoso-golf-course-in-oro-valley-arizona
tastrax (2024-01-28 04:16:40+00:00): Looks like the guide has been updated https://www.southernmidlands.tas.gov.au/assets/Lake_Dulverton_and_Dulverton_Walking_Track_Information_Guide_Updated_20221018.pdf
OSM_RogerWilco (2024-01-26 10:31:51+00:00): Hi geozeisig,

woher kommt denn die ref-Angabe? Die scheint mir nicht richtig zu sein.

Gruß Roger Wilco
geozeisig (2024-01-27 07:33:24+00:00): Hallo

Die ref Angabe wird aus der Richtung der Startbahn ermittelt. Die 07 ergibt sich aus der Richtung 75° durch Weglassen der Einerstelle und ist immer 2-stellig also mit führender Null. Man kann die Richtung in JOSM unten in der Statusleiste ablesen. Zu beachten ist allerdings, dass sie sich auf den magnetischen Norden bezieht, es muss also eine Missweisung bedacht werden. Bei asphaltierten Startbahnen steht es gut sichtbar am Anfang. Maßgebend ist im Endeffekt die offizielle Angabe.

Ich hoffe, es hat die geholfen.

Gruß Dieter
OSM_RogerWilco (2024-01-27 09:47:15+00:00): Moin Dieter,
Vielen Dank für die Erklärung! Wieder was gelernt.
Auf deren Webseite wird folgendes angegeben:
Bahn: 600m - 260/ 08 - Gras
Ich vermute dass ist dann die 260/08, oder?
Viele Grüße
geozeisig (2024-01-27 10:55:52+00:00): Die kleinere Zahl muss auf jeden Fall vorne stehen, es könnte also 08/26 heißen.

Siehe auch https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Runway

Viele Grüße
GrabMY_ainayusof (2024-09-11 04:05:43+00:00): Hi Calueque. 

Since this is commercial area, I believe no residential ways exist in this area. Road classification should be minor/unclassified or service type for the said area. Hope you can be more careful while selecting the ways feature type.

thanks!
CaluequeDam (2024-09-12 14:42:16+00:00): Hello GrabMY_ainayusof, 

I had made these residential since they exist within the residential polygon https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/539027552 and the other neighborhoods in the area are also tagged residential. However, if you believe this is not the case, I will defer to your edits in having the highways be classified as unclassified/service type. Thank you and have a great day!
GrabMY_ainayusof (2024-09-13 04:13:51+00:00): Hello. 

In Malaysia it is quite common for commercial area to be located within residential area. I think its best to classify as unclassified type since no house detected in the particular area.

Have a great day too CaluequeDam!
LemonEarlMapper (2024-09-13 14:41:02+00:00): Thank you for the valued input!
citrula (2024-01-26 02:41:40+00:00): Welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contributions. A lot of road data in the US has been untouched since it was imported from TIGER in 2007/2008. You will often find roads that were planned but never actually existed, or unmaintained/abandoned roads. In these cases it looks like the roads exist in some form but are probably not navigable by cars. Please take a look at the wiki page for abandoned roads: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:abandoned:highway . Let me know if you have any questions, and happy mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146660159
Peter Fobel (2024-01-26 03:07:02+00:00): I have jogged every street in this area.  Even if they were planned, these roads have no trace left.  They are AT BEST a bushwhack of hiking trails through thick brush.  There is no vestige of pavement and the right of way is not easily passable by car, foot, or bicycle.
citrula (2024-01-26 06:03:00+00:00): Makes sense, thanks. It's quite hard to tell from aerial/hillshade imagery the condition of the trail, so your on-the-ground experience is valuable!
citrula (2024-01-26 02:42:11+00:00): Looks good!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146660358
MxxCon (2024-01-25 22:54:47+00:00): This edit will be reverted in full.
These features are supposed to be separate because they map different things.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146660399
MxxCon (2024-01-25 22:55:12+00:00): Reverted.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146691326
Marek-M (2024-01-25 17:54:40+00:00): Cześć, dzięki za dodanie hydrantów wraz ze szczegółami! Dobra robota :)

Zdecydowana większość hydrantów nie posiada nazwy (musiałby mieć jakąś tabliczkę z tą nazwą) i dlatego opis w stylu 'Nabrzeże Oliwskie - PSP FLORIAN' powinien trafić do tagu description a nie do name. 

Dodatkowo tag fire_hydrant:pressure 
nie został prawidłowo użyty. Liczby w OSM zapisujemy z kropką oddzielającą część dziesiętną. Wydajność opisujemy oddzielnym tagiem flow_rate=*. Jednostki oddzielamy od wartości spacją, co akurat prawidłowo było zrobione

Zatem przykładowa wartość:

fire_hydrant:pressure=2,6 Bar, Wydajność 11,50 dm³/s

powinna być zapisana w OSM następująco:

fire_hydrant:pressure=2.6 Bar
flow_rate=11.50 l/s

Poprawisz sam te uwagi? Jeśli nie, to mogę Ci tym pomóc. Pozdrawiam!
Marek-M (2024-01-25 18:58:47+00:00): Jeden z hydrantów przerobiłem w taki sposób, który jest poprawny:
https://osm.mapki.com/history/node/11549169319
mcliquid (2024-01-25 08:27:26+00:00): Hi,

please note: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
woodpeck_repair (2024-02-12 13:53:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 147368387 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism
woodpeck_repair (2024-02-12 13:53:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 147368387 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism
Frame&Focus (2024-01-25 08:19:15+00:00): Related changeset where I previously added the star tags: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146534318
Константин Гам (2024-01-25 16:08:29+00:00): Добрый день! 
Делая "детализацию", вы удалили теги тротуара с тротуара. Детали потерялись... Пожалуйста, не надо так "детализировать" карту. Ночью по данному тротуару катался, он на месте.
gendy54 (2024-02-11 10:35:24+00:00): Attention à ne pas mettre de données perso qui sont accessibles à tout le monde
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146661725
Wulf4096 (2024-11-28 20:05:53+00:00): Hallo!
Magst du mal einen Blick auf
https://osm.org/note/4535610
https://osm.org/note/4536379
werfen?
N.B.: Ich kenne weder die Beschilderung vor Ort noch irgendwelche Pläne, von daher habe ich keine Meinung dazu, was nun tatsächlich stimmt.
AndySchulte (2024-12-02 05:46:42+00:00): Hallo Wulf4096,

ich habe die Namen korrigiert. Ich hatte seinerzeit einen Plan der KlgV von der Vorsitzenden erhalten. Leider finde ich den Plan nicht wieder. Da der Nutzer seiner Sache sicher zu sein scheint, habe ich Die Änderung nun durchgeführt.
Danke für den Hinweis.
Grüße Andy
literan (2024-01-25 19:31:55+00:00): а тут точно private (вход/проезд по пропускам)?

https://yandex.ru/maps/-/CDuLfOy4 тут вот видно, что никто не контролирует вход через шлагбаум...
user_610278 (2024-01-26 07:35:13+00:00): Здесь моё недопонимание данного атрибута сыграло плохую роль. Правку лучше откатить.
literan (2024-01-26 08:12:11+00:00): давайте лучше заменим на motor_vehicle=private - ведь там только для машинок по электронным пропускам, наверное?
user_610278 (2024-01-26 08:31:26+00:00): Да, за исключением въезда на территорию НТЦ Заря - там уже по пропускам с контролем.
literan (2024-01-27 10:47:29+00:00): пофиксил
Allison P (2024-01-25 14:54:44+00:00): Spam will not be tolerated, especially as you have damaged correct existing data in the process.
woodpeck_repair (2024-02-12 13:53:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 147368387 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism
jandar22 (2024-02-12 15:35:04+00:00): The parking aisles in Joyce lot were closed temporarily for construction and should have been tagged with highway=construction rather than deleted. They are currently reopened. Please revert these deletions.
jandar22 (2024-02-12 15:36:47+00:00): The parking aisles in Joyce lot were closed temporarily for construction and should have been tagged with highway=construction rather than deleted. They are currently reopened. Please revert these deletions.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146662179
vrynkevich_lyft (2024-02-13 12:30:02+00:00): Hi, finnc32 ! My name is Veranika and I am a mapper in the OSM team at Lyft.
According to Lyft-owned aerial imagery, the Joyce lot looks like a full renovation with removed surface and also, there are still no Lyft drivers GPS tracks. So I decided to remove the roads assuming there would be large geometry changes.
Thank you for letting us know about the current situation at the parking lot, but unfortunately the freshest satellite imagery indicates like there is still a construction and we cannot add roads because we don't see the current geometry and lane markings. If you were near the Joyce lot and saw that the parking markings have not changed after the construction ended, we can add the roads back in according to the Bing background.
Thanks for bringing this to our attention. Sorry for any inconvenience this may cause.
jandar22 (2024-02-13 14:21:42+00:00): Thanks for your attention to this. I am in the area and verified in person yesterday that the lot has been reopened in its usual capacity. The lot had been closed for installation of a geothermal energy field. Generally it's recommended to only tag an area/ways as under construction if there is construction visible, and wait until construction is over to verify if features have been permanently removed or replaced with something different before deleting the features. The realignment of Moose Krause Circle as part of this changeset is correct, but the ways deleted within the parking lot should be reverted.
vrynkevich_lyft (2024-02-14 08:08:05+00:00): Thank you for clarifying the information. Returned the roads according to Bing background https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147438024. 
Best regards, Veranika
MxxCon (2024-01-25 22:59:57+00:00): Hello.
What exactly is this location? Is this a restaurant, is this an office, is this something else?

cuisine=restaurant_consulting is not a valid tag and will be deleted.
description= tag will be deleted since https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description explicitly states that this tag must NOT be advertisement or otherwise promotional messaging. It must be a neutral tone description of this feature.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146662185
Hungerburg (2024-03-06 23:50:36+00:00): Ich bin Jo Wagner nie begegnet. Das Vergnügen aber berechtigt nicht zum Erstellen von Phantasierelationen. Der Lustige Bergler Steig geht dort nicht entlang.

Wer wird die löschen?
Hungerburg (2024-03-06 23:52:31+00:00): Hmm, der Umfang vom CS lässt vermuten, dass da noch mehr phantasiert wurde?
metjowagner (2024-03-07 08:25:50+00:00): Die Relation Lustige-Bergler-Steig hatte ich leider nicht korrekt eingetragen - jetzt sollte es passen. Wenn es nicht der Fall ist, bitte nicht nur raunzen, sondern auch korrigieren. Generell gibt es in Tirol viel mehr Wanderwege, die als Relation erfasst werden sollten weil sie markiert sind und es Wegweiser gibt. Es gibt also derzeit ganz viele false negative und wenige (wie beim Lustigen-Bergler-Steig) false positive. Beide Fälle sollten in Tirol weniger auftreten.
Hungerburg (2024-03-07 11:51:18+00:00): Bitte um Verzeihung. Bei so viel Ortsunkundigeit ist es mit mir durchgegangen.

Benannte Steige zu Relationen geht sicher gut, wenn die von A nach B führen.

Der Butterbründlsteig Lizum Birgitzalm wäre ein Kandidat.

Bei Wegnummern auf Wegweisern wird es schwieriger, ein Gewirr das. Die stammen wohl aus den 50er Jahren und keiner weiß mehr genau.

Stillschweigend korrigiert hab ich übrigens auch schon.
woodpeck_repair (2024-02-12 13:53:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 147368387 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism
NeisBot (2024-01-26 01:31:04+00:00): Hi MameshShrestha 👋

your recent changeset has been marked due to a temporary or permanent block from further map edits. 

If you have any questions or if there's anything you'd like to discuss regarding the mapping, feel free to reach out! 

Best regards, 🤖

Details https://osm.org/user_blocks/15613
#ContributorHasBeenBlocked
Piskvor (2024-01-25 11:04:20+00:00): Zdravím,

jsou ty tunely pod tratí osvětlené, nebo je to jen díra v zemi, s chodbou sem a tam?

Zdar,
Piškvor
Martin2035 (2024-01-25 11:07:34+00:00): ahoj, v každém tunelu jsou 4 zářivky. byl jsem tam přes den, ale předpokládám, že v noci svítí.
Piskvor (2024-01-25 11:21:29+00:00): Ahoj, díky...zkusím se mrknout, až budu mít cestu večer, ale zatím to přidám jako lit=yes
Martin2035 (2024-01-25 21:12:56+00:00): ok, díky
alexey_zakharenkov (2024-03-03 07:28:08+00:00): Пакет содержит:
- преобразование части здания в здание (building:part в building) с проставлением адреса на часть, что неправильно
- перерисовку геометрии здания с удалением предыдущего, с потерей множества полезных тегов.

Правка откачена.
eggie (2024-01-25 09:33:54+00:00):  

Wees even voorzichtig met het aanbrengen van nieuwe edits.  
Mocht je op deze manier doorgaan zal er overwogen worden een (tijdelijke) stop op je account te plaatsen.  
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Data_working_group
eggie (2024-01-25 09:35:47+00:00): reverted by changeset #146664884
due to vandalism.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-09-10 09:28:07+00:00): Please don't use roads as multipolygon members
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146663753
MxxCon (2024-01-25 23:43:36+00:00): Hello.
Washington Square Village is the name of this apartment complex, but I'm not sure this is actually the name of this way... Looking at cyclomedia imagery from Oct 2023 I'm not seeing any street signs along either of these ways..
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146664067
aliaksei_boldyrau (2024-01-26 11:54:40+00:00): Hello, thank you for your feedback.
According to the data we have at our disposal, the name of the road is Washington Square Village.
If you have sources confirming that the name of the street is different, could you please send them?
We will review them and make appropriate changes.
Thank you!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146664067
Allison P (2024-01-26 18:00:15+00:00): It's very hard to prove a negative. Perhaps you should provide your source and explain why it's trustworthy instead of the other way around. I cannot find a street in the assessor's dataset with this name. Keep in mind that this is a square, and the addresses are based on that rather than on a street.
MxxCon (2024-01-26 18:11:00+00:00): Here's cyclomedia imagery from Oct 2023 https://www.geocoder.nyc/streetview.html?lnglat=-73.99630486965181,40.72855354804826 that doesn't show street name signs.
Here's NYC's ZoLa of this block without the named streets https://zola.planning.nyc.gov/l/lot/1/533/1
Here's NYC Street Map also not listing these streets: https://streets.planning.nyc.gov/?lat=40.728&layer-groups=%5B%22arterials%22%2C%22citymap%22%2C%22name-changes%22%2C%22paper-streets%22%2C%22pierhead-bulkhead-lines%22%2C%22stair-streets%22%2C%22street-centerlines%22%5D&lng=-73.9968&zoom=16.98
Doesn't seem like they are named.
aliaksei_boldyrau (2024-01-29 07:00:49+00:00): Hello, MxxCon and Allison P! Thanks for providing this information.
The source upon which the decision to add the road name was made is The North American Roads: 
https://data-usdot.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/usdot::north-american-roads/explore?location=40.727995%2C-73.997219%2C18.00
On this map you can see that the name of this road is displayed as Washington Square Village.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146664067
MxxCon (2024-01-29 08:01:19+00:00): I'm not sure about how accurate/up-to-date that map is.. I looked through a bunch of different zoning and development maps and charts on both, ZoLa and NYC Planning for that area going back as far as I could find docs and didn't see a single reference to these driveways by that name.
Before the construction of this apartment complex these used to be Wooster and Greene Streets. But documents dating back to at least 1956 explicitly crossed out those names.

Looking at that map around my home neighborhood I found at least one street name that also does not exist. When I saw it in OSM, I walked over there and asked people who live in homes on that "street" if they knew anything about that name and they had no idea what I was talking about. All the homes there had address of the main street nearby.

The point is, I'm not sure that "more data" coming from that map is "better data". I'd trust a more precise, narrower scope maps from NYC itself rather than a US-wide amalgamation map.
aliaksei_boldyrau (2024-01-29 10:29:17+00:00): I agree with you, so I've rolled back the change. Thank you for the productive communication. Have a good day!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146664067
phoenixsaigon1698 (2024-12-31 09:51:21+00:00): Ngõ này oto đi lại bình thường, sao lại để motorcar=destination nhỉ?
flohoff (2024-01-25 11:36:02+00:00): Moin,
sag mal heisst das Gebäude so oder der Kindergarten? Ich würde sagen der name muss eigentlich auf das amenity=kindergarden - also auf die Fläche oder?


Ich hab da die landuses und flächenverklebungen eben auch mal aufgeräumt. 

Flo
eggie (2024-01-25 10:52:14+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Normaal gesproken komen de adresnodes mee met de import. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-01-25 10:56:06+00:00): Adressen aangepast middels nodes
NeisBot (2024-01-27 11:07:30+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146739918
empty_child (2024-01-26 09:09:33+00:00): Good afternoon Jaba,
If you change roads radically, restore relations, connected to them, please. You break all bus routes in Rustavi (as I remember, not the first time).
empty_child (2024-01-26 09:59:03+00:00): Fixed (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146703002)
empty_child (2024-01-26 10:04:32+00:00): You can check routes' state here (https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=45.25134&lat=41.83075&zoom=9). If it's black, it was broken earlier. By click, you can see problem description. Updating once a day
flohoff (2024-01-25 13:41:09+00:00): Moin,
nur weil ich zufällig die changeset gesehen habe weil sich routing geändert hat.

Wenn du maxspeeds einträgst änderst dann schmeiss doch gleich ein maxspeed:type hinterher - Dann ist klar ob das ein zonengebot oder ein einfaches schild ist.

Machts beim vervollständigen von maxspeeds meistens viel einfacher.

So long

Flo
eggie (2024-01-25 10:25:30+00:00): herstel Winkelmadepark moet commentaar zijn
eggie (2024-01-25 10:56:28+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-25 10:30:30+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2607325833
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/286393315

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-25 10:30:32+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1227707909

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Svalbard (2024-01-26 09:35:38+00:00): Hallo AikoUnterwegs, für "opening_hours" gibt es definierte Vorgaben [1]. Freier Text ist hier nicht vorgesehen. Sofern sich in den Vorgaben keine passende Definition zu den vor Ort vorherrschenden "Öffnungszeiten" finden lässt, lösche Deine Eingabe bitte. Vielen Dank! Gruß Svalbard

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours
theWR-Engineer (2024-01-30 07:12:59+00:00): Golan Heights does not belong to Israel.
ASMapper (2024-01-30 10:40:21+00:00): As a Syrian, I agree 5000%, but I believe the borders in OSM reflect the de facto borders and not the de jure. That’s why I made a relation with the legal borders of Syria.
Taya_S (2025-12-22 17:39:06+00:00): It seems this object was recently deleted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173765029

If you have any contributions as to why this object should or shouldn't be restored, please comment there.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-05 13:23:30+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11549383761/history has shop = barber that was added in this edit
shop=barber ? Maybe following https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:hairdresser%3Dbarber would be a good idea and shop=hairdresser hairdresser=barber would be a better tagging?
Piagno (2025-11-07 04:47:02+00:00): you are right, I don't know what I was thinking then... changed it.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174316051
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-09 06:35:03+00:00): probably tagging changed, there were multiple rounds of discussion on this topic
Piagno (2025-11-09 10:21:57+00:00): aah, yes possible
yelisey90 (2025-12-10 07:48:09+00:00): reverted with respect to https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10869007405

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175746073
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-25 11:00:27+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1231073152

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Tatfahren (2024-01-25 12:14:18+00:00): Hallo Rhoon,
bei diesem Wendeplatz heißt die Haltestelle tatsächlich so. Sollte das trotzdem entfernt werden? Es gibt auch noch in Grumbach und Braunsdorf einen Wendeplatz der so heißt und wahrscheinlich in OSM so benannt ist. Die könnte man dann ja eigentlich auch entfernen?

Ich habe da nicht so viel Erfahrung wie Bushaltestellen korrekt benannt werden.
Rhoon (2024-01-25 14:24:14+00:00): Der Bushalteplatz heißt schon "Mohorn, Wendeplatz". Wenn der Wartebereich auch noch so heißt, finde ich das kartographisch redundant :-)