piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
lawrencebanks (2024-02-05 09:58:51+00:00): Why did you replace the Romanian name of the church with the English one?
Privatemajory (2024-02-02 17:49:45+00:00): Bonjour! Merci pour votre contribution à OpenStreetMap!

Dans votre groupe de modifications, beaucoup de routes du côté d'Analamahitsy ont été changées en highway=primary. Cet attribut est à priori réservé aux routes appartenant au réseau des routes nationales primaires (voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Madagascar_tagging_guidelines#R%C3%A9seau_routier). La RN 3 étant une route nationale secondaire, elle devrait être highway=secondary.

Pourriez-vous revoir la catégorisation de ces routes?
ChehrehBargi (2024-02-01 06:43:04+00:00): wiki osm:
.The most prominent name on a sign posted on the feature itself, especially for a feature in the built environment
.For disputed areas, please use the name as displayed on, e.g., street signs for the name tag
ChehrehBargi (2024-02-01 06:47:44+00:00): On the same page as you say, if the name of the street is a point of dispute, we will use the sign on the street for the name label.
LockOnGuy (2024-02-01 07:08:22+00:00): @ChehrehBargi Please the wiki: "If an official name is more unwieldy or obscure than another name for the same feature and fewer people use it in practice, even if it is signposted, it is better to put the official name in official_name=* or alt_name=* than to treat it as the primary name."      
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name#:~:text=even%20if%20it%20is%20signposted         
I survey this a couple of months ago, and during that time, no individuals were found to be familiar with the mentioned deleted name here. In the event that you were to inquire with a taxi driver regarding this designation, they would express bewilderment and confusion. I have traversed this road on several occasions and have not observed any signage bearing the specified information. It is plausible that the sign may have been removed. I encourage you to verify this information with the individual who sent you to comment here and told you to say the hebrew, and Maryam thing on the other changesets, as I had previously shared images and videos from this city two months ago with him.      
I am willing to visit the specified area again since it's not that far from where I'm staying, with the intention of meeting anyone who is willing to guide me to the current location of the signs. I am open to being shown the presence of official signage to verify the accuracy of the information provided.           
            
Regards.
ChehrehBargi (2024-02-01 10:11:43+00:00): This feature is not vague or ambiguous. The new name here is not used at all. I have already reminded you of this wiki rule: when there is a naming dispute, the name on the board is used for the label. Therefore, you cannot delete the new name.
Regarding routing for other users: the name that existed before will not be deleted and will be placed in the "old name" tag. The rules of osm are quite clear, but you don't want to act according to them.
Regarding routing for other users: the name that existed before will not be deleted and will be placed in the "old name" tag. The rules of osm are quite clear, but you don't want to act according to them. Regarding your writing in Hebrew: it is enough for someone to check your edits to make everything clear. Regarding the example of the church and respect for religions: You have also removed my previous edits regarding the respectful suffix "عليه السلام" for imams, including Hazrat Adam, peace be upon him(عليه السلام), Noah, peace be upon him(عليه السلام), and Imam Ali, peace be upon him(عليه السلام).
About the boards: they exist but you call them informal with excuses. While they have been installed by the government.
LockOnGuy (2024-02-01 10:44:02+00:00): Why did you ignore or not read my comment?            
Calling the name as disputed is exaggerated, for it to be disputed, some locals must acknowledge and recognize it, and no one do on the ground per my survey what I witnessed first hand, what part of this you don't understand?         
I offered to meet at the subject location since it's not that far from me and survey what's on the ground but you ignored, because you're a foreigner from another country or don't want to travel just to be proven wrong.                    
You're mentioning the wiki but keep ignoring this rule "If an official name is more unwieldy or obscure than another name for the same feature and fewer people use it in practice, even if it is signposted, it is better to put the official name in official_name=* or alt_name=* than to treat it as the primary name." https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name#:~:text=even%20if%20it%20is%20signposted           
       
Regarding the suffix and puffery, it do not belong to OSM, for example, see The Kaaba, which is the most holiest place for Muslims, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/103914569 the name is "الكعبة" no any additional text, or maybe your idol https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/537848068 there is no "قدس سرة" suffix etc..       
Regards.
ChehrehBargi (2024-02-01 14:23:27+00:00): Of course, it is you who wants to project. You call me a foreigner again. If you have documentation for your claim, take a photo of the place and upload it through mapillary. I will do the same. At the same time, I want all the editors to use the mapillary software to record such routes so that there is no room for doubt. We know that the name of Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis was added to the airport street and several other streets by the Iraqi government. But you keep deleting it. Editors, regardless of what they believe, have an obligation to record what is on the ground. You should not delete the efforts of others because it does not agree with your opinion.
Actually, there is a difference: you delete the name of the street and another user writes the name of the sign. Re-read the previous notes and read the wiki rules carefully to find out who is right. In addition, I have read the wiki rules and my work is not wrong, but your work is exactly wrong. The Kaaba is written in the same way in our language and you ignore the respect for the prophets. Regarding the wiki rule, you should read my note again: the new name is not ambiguous and people use it, and it is not a difficult name, and of course it is a new name, and the previous name is a local name with "loc name" and "old name" tags. It should be used, not removed. In fact, you have violated your word: even if we assume that the tag "official_name=*" should have been used, you have not used it either and you have completely removed the new name "جسر محمد باقر الصدر". And another user took pains and added it.
stasiu512 (2025-02-01 21:42:01+00:00): Cześć, w ciągu Śląska - Górskiego - Sportowa - Łużycka - Stryjska dodałeś trakcję trolejbusową która nigdy nie istniała. Trolejbusy linii 27 kursują po tych ulicach na akumulatorach bez sieci trakcyjnej. Poprawiłem w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162026902
Marek-M (2025-02-01 23:34:19+00:00): Super, dzięki za korektę. Z trolejbusami pracowałem w osm krótko, bo zbieranie danych o trakcji mnie męczyło.
stasiu512 (2025-02-01 23:44:03+00:00): Uzupełniłem całą sieć na stan bieżący wiec myślę że przez dłuższy czas mamy spokój od zmian :) Teraz zajmuję się relacjami linii trolejbusowych co nie jest takie proste, bo relatify nie obsługuje route=trolleybus a relacje są do poprawy. Na razie chwilowo zmieniam na route=bus i po edycji przywracam route=trolleybus, chyba jedyne rozwiązanie żeby relatify je obsługiwało.
Marek-M (2025-02-02 07:25:12+00:00): Świetny pomysł na Relatify. OSMI jednak te relacje trolejbusowe będzie wyświetlał na czarno, bo oczekuje trakcji na drogach i nie uznaje przejazdów na akumulatorach.
stasiu512 (2025-02-02 09:52:15+00:00): To już problem OSMI, nie możemy mapować sieci trakcyjnej tam gdzie jej nie ma, to bez sensu. W JOSM też walidator wyskakuje z błędem od razu ale najwidoczniej Gdynia jest do przodu :)
Ewen Hill (2024-02-01 02:34:10+00:00): Hi again 80R5Q5ZFNF, this is a lane and does not extend as far as it appears to.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146917779
akimapbuilder (2024-02-01 13:47:48+00:00): HI! 
Thanks for pointing out this one as well.
80R5Q5ZFNF (2024-02-02 02:49:48+00:00): your welcome
eggie (2024-01-31 19:40:39+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback   Let wel op. Als je schuif verplaats je onbedoeld adresnodes en/of andere nodes met alles wat er aan vast zit. Houd het gebied van je edits klein. Meengatstraat 106 ligt nu ergens anders.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=146917785

bicycle=yes hoort niet op fietspaden. Dat is default

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-01-31 19:46:12+00:00): adres hersteld.
eggie (2024-01-31 19:47:52+00:00): nestplaats teruggeplaatst
eggie (2024-01-31 19:49:45+00:00): Alle begin is moeilijk. 
Waarom access=no op trottoirs  Mag daar niemand komen :)
Wanneer je zo trottoirs inteken zonder verbinding met andere wegen routeert het allemaal niet.
Ik pas wat aan.
eggie (2024-01-31 19:51:42+00:00): access no verwijderd van voetpaden. foot=yes hoeft niet op voetpaden. Dat is default net als bicycle=no

Mapse
eggie
eggie (2024-01-31 19:54:56+00:00): Nog een tip   .. Die doorsteken zijn geen sidewalk.
Trottoirs langs wegen worden vaak opgenomen in de hoofdrijbaan met sidewalk=right left of both. 
Op de standaardkaart zie je dat niet.., maar er zijn meer kaarten. 
Langsliggende trottoirs apart intekenen routeert niet. Je krijgt omwegen.
eggie (2024-01-31 19:58:11+00:00): Thorbeckestraat access no verwijderd. Trap toegevoegd met highway steps.
MacK001 (2024-01-31 21:50:23+00:00): Dank voor je reactie. Defaults zal ik volgende keer laten staan etc.
eggie (2024-01-31 21:53:47+00:00): Top... In het begin is het gewoon veel in de wiki kijken, maar op een gegeven moment gaat het automatisch.
Veel plezier met mappen,
eggie
Ewen Hill (2024-02-01 02:30:32+00:00): Hi 80R5Q5ZFNF, thanks for mapping this however this is not an unclassified highway, it is a private driveway and should have the following tags...
highway=service
service=driveway
access=private
surface=unpaved

Can you check that all your recent entries to make sure the access is correct as biosecurity is an extremely important issue. Thanks
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146917881
akimapbuilder (2024-02-01 13:41:17+00:00): Hi Ewen!
Thank you for the good explanation to Map builder users on how this road should be tagged.
This is for sure driveway. 
I will look at other edits of this user.
Best regards
Xvtn (2024-02-06 15:37:19+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes here. In this case, I'd suggest copying the address tags to nodes ("points") and leave them on the empty plots. Then remove the ways ("areas") you've marked as plots here. Keep in mind that the name tag is for actual common names, not descriptions: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions

Let me know if you have any questions. Or if you prefer I made the fixes I suggested, that's fine. Thanks for your contributions!
eggie (2024-01-31 20:08:40+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-01-31 20:14:02+00:00): Feedback Formeel is het geen fietspad. Het bord fietspad ontbreekt. We taggen zoiets dan als highway=path surface=paving_stones bicycle=yes foot=yes
Xvtn (2024-02-06 15:30:35+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes. Looks great to me! My rule of thumb is usually that a sidewalk is a foot path next to a thru street. So I think you're correct that this works great as a foot path. Thanks for your contribution!
Baloo Uriza (2024-11-21 19:26:59+00:00): Not sure what you mean by the comma thing.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146918475
Troy Bumgardner (2024-11-21 19:41:04+00:00): Right now things look good, that was months ago I can't recall why I made that comment.  Thanks!
Glassman (2024-02-02 19:52:57+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

From bing imagery these look like oneway links. I've gone ahead and fixed them. Let me know if I got it wrong.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146919305
Filip009 (2024-02-02 13:36:07+00:00): Zdravím, všetky 4 prícestné kríže ste pridal ako kaplnky. Opravil som to.
Yunkers (2024-02-21 11:47:13+00:00): Hej, na drodze wciąż jest tag smoothness=good, co sugeruje że droga wcale nie w złym stanie. Czy masz może jakieś materiały potwierdzające nawierzchnię? Może chodzi o inny fragment?
ivanbranco (2024-02-29 10:41:21+00:00): Hi xrefz,

I think you added Q122870674 as wikidata=* value instead of operator:wikidata=* by mistake. Could you take a look at it? Thank you and good mapping
MxxCon (2024-02-04 06:41:49+00:00): Why is this complex called Cherry Hill but website points to oak ridge?
And why is this mapped as a separate node rather than tags on the area itself?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146920531
baspng (2024-02-02 18:57:50+00:00): "Estrada Agrícola" estaria mais para classificação de vias do que para "name", mas esta classificação não existe.
O "name" é aquele nome dado, geralmente pelas Prefeituras e outros órgãos públicos administrativos, por exemplo: Rua São José, Avenida Brasil, Estrada Vicinal José da Silva, Praça das Flores, etc.
O "Estrada Agrícola" está sendo exaustivamente repetido e não acredito que as autoridades tenham nomeado tantos carreadouros de lavoura com o mesmo nome.
Quanto ao limite de velocidade, pelo que sabemos, é fixado pelas autoridades e expostos em placas à beira da estrada. Se não existirem estas placas como é que vamos saber o valor do "maxspeed"? E em carreadouros de lavouras e simples estradas de terrra não encontramos tais placas. Diz nas instruções do mapa que "onde não se sabe qual é o limite, não se deve inscluir a etiqueta "maxspeed", assim como quando não se sabe qual é o nome, não se deve incluir a etiqueta "name".
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-02 13:18:29+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/344286083/history has access:psv that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
Would using psv access tag (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:psv ) be fitting at least equally well?
dylfitt (2024-02-03 14:52:35+00:00): After looking at the path again, I’m realizing it is actually a service road marked as “fire lane” for emergency access. I also changed the access:psv= tag to psv=. Thank you for noticing that!
eggie (2024-01-31 21:35:26+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Wanneer er geen parkeerplaats is kan die uiteraard weg.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Muhmaker (2024-02-01 15:07:13+00:00): Hi. Kannst du mir bitte mal eine Quelle nennen mit der du diese Änderung begründen würdest? Sowohl der GPX-Track von der Seite des Teutoburgerwald-Vereins als auch die Beschilderung vor Ort führen den Leineweberweg durch den Park. Heute noch nachgesehen. Das gleiche gilt für die Beschilderung des Raute5-Weges auch wenn es reichlich unlogisch ist den über die Ampel zu führen. Ist aber so ausgeschildert.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-31 21:10:16+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11574703804

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-31 21:10:17+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11574703804

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Fizzie-DWG (2024-02-03 02:55:51+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15655
Fizzie-DWG (2024-02-06 00:48:10+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147114294
crabctrl (2024-01-31 21:08:40+00:00): This Cartems location closed recently; the building is still present but unused with a note from the former Cartems saying it's closed permanently (likely to develop into something else). Is this the appropriate way to tag this node?
eggie (2024-01-31 21:38:15+00:00): Dag Crissie   Heb je het de voorgaande mapper gevraagd, want die ken ik wel als een serieuze mapper.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102693403
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-01-31 21:39:28+00:00): Je gebruikt BING als achtergrond en die is veelal outdated. Gebruik PDOK actueel svp.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-01-31 21:41:58+00:00): Gebouw opnieuw uitgelijnd mbv de BGT   Met een luchtfoto bijna niet te doen.
Gr eggie
crissie78! (2024-01-31 21:49:55+00:00): Hoe stel ik achtergrond op PDOK ipv BING kan dat nergens vinden
eggie (2024-01-31 21:51:56+00:00): Volgens mij is het je al gelukt :)
Glassman (2024-02-02 20:06:32+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.

Question - you limited access to students. Can't teachers also enter the area?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146921986
eggie (2024-01-31 21:44:39+00:00): Crissie   name= heb ik even aangepast naar description  
Zo'n bouwlocatie heeft geen naam. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-01-31 21:49:45+00:00): Greenfield is de juiste tag als er nog niet gebouwd wordt. De tag rendert echter niet op de stanxdaardkaart. 
Geen probleem.
Zodra er gebouwd wordt kun je greenfield aanpassen naar landuse=construction.
eggie (2024-01-31 21:50:58+00:00): Wellicht heb iets aan de laatste satfoto's 
https://www.satellietdataportaal.nl/?base=openstreetmap&res=0.3%2C0.5&datemin=31-01-2023&loc=52.10100%2C5.777902%2C18z&overlay=mos-0&marker=loc&acqdate=2024-01-10&acqid=20240110_104531_PNEO-04_1_1&sensor=Pleiades-NEO
Narvik2 (2024-02-01 13:27:47+00:00): Szia!
A kelenföldi alállomás területét megnyitották és parkosították, az Esri rétegen látszik a frissebb állapot
bkil (2024-02-01 20:33:09+00:00): Pontosan mi a hiba itt? Érdemes visszavonni az egészet és átemelni a lényeget?
ha5vsa (2024-02-01 20:46:06+00:00): Már visszavonta az egyetlen releváns változtatást: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146945970
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-31 21:50:23+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1231073218

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Xvtn (2024-02-06 15:19:18+00:00): Hi! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes here. Everything looks good, only minor issue is that there should be semicolons after each opening range in the hours. So it should be
Mo-Th 11:00-21:0;0 Fr-Sa 11:00-22:00; Su 11:00-20:00
instead. Opening_hours can be really tricky so I often use this tool to make sure I've got it right: https://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/

Anyway, thanks for your contributions! Let me know if you have any questions.
Xvtn (2024-02-06 15:20:50+00:00): Oops, I misplaced that semicolon. Should be
Mo-Th 11:00-21:00; Fr-Sa 11:00-22:00; Su 11:00-20:00
simo_explorer (2024-02-02 12:13:34+00:00): Good morning Rachealayeni,
many tags you entered are badly written (buiiding), could you check?
thanks for collaboration
Glassman (2024-02-02 20:04:48+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.

#TIP: square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q"
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146923631
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-03-18 21:58:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 148836330 where the changeset comment is: reverting some suspicious names in Bulgaria.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15759
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-03-18 21:58:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 148836330 where the changeset comment is: reverting some suspicious names in Bulgaria.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15759
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-03-18 21:58:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 148836330 where the changeset comment is: reverting some suspicious names in Bulgaria.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15759
Xvtn (2024-02-06 15:15:22+00:00): Hi! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes here. Looks good generally, the only possible issue I see here is that if the complex could be considered to enclose the more general area (incl track, etc.) I might make that a separate outer area. As opposed to naming the soccer field as the complex. Looks like a good tag for the outer complex might be leisure=sports_centre, aka "Sports Center / Complex".
Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks for your contributions!
Tomas Straupis (2024-02-02 06:57:55+00:00): Hello, please do not change waterbody tagging in Lithuania, you're damaging good data. I will revert your changes in Lithuania.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-31 23:11:03+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Letniskowa":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11575135257
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11575135258

"Karnowskiego":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11575135282
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11575135348

"Zakładowa":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11575135329

"Hieronima Derdowskiego":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11575135385
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11575135386

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
G_P_J (2024-02-05 22:07:22+00:00): Poprawione.
Hufkratzer (2024-02-01 21:35:44+00:00): Hi,
wenn die beiden Gebäude, die du hier mit leisure=horse_riding getaggt hast, zu dem Reitverein gehören, dann hättest du stattdessen besser das Gelände https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1075397458 von dem Reitverein so vergrößert, dass die da mit drin sind (und die Reitplätze auch). Denn es gibt den Reitverein ja nur einmal, also sollte man dafür auch nicht 3 verschiedene Objekte mit leisure=horse_riding haben; vgl. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure=horse_riding#Wann_nicht_verwenden