piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NieWnen (2025-09-12 15:41:44+00:00): > Gdy jeździłem częściej WKD, to za każdym razem zatrzymywał się w części przed semaforem (dalej od pochylni)

Od jakiegoś czasu pewnie tak jest, bo zazwyczaj przed nim stoi jeszcze kolejna WKDka przez chwilę :P Ale jak wyżej bywało różnie i nie mam pewności, czy teraz zawsze się zatrzymuje np. poza godzinami szczytu.
Natomiast ja bym trzymał tutaj mimo wszystko trzymał 1 peron/stop. Na upartego można tam dojechać :P

--

Jeśli WKD to rozróżnia, to może warto to nanieść  z
`railway:platform:section` na krawędź peronową `railway=platform_edge`? W sumie sami używają słowa "sektor" w tym linku.

Tylko nie wiem skąd i co z 1a w takim razie?
Anas masuris (2025-09-12 15:47:48+00:00): 1a wziąłem z materiałów przetargowych przebudowy SRK na linii WKD. Ale ok, złączę perony i  dodam sektory
NieWnen (2025-09-12 15:50:43+00:00): Dzięki, tylko od razu drobna uwaga z góry, żeby przy złączaniu zachować ten z dłuższą historią :P
Rogoyski (2026-07-18 18:52:03+00:00): Muszę niestety zwrócić Ci uwagę na odróżnianie kamienia od betonu. Większość przejść podziemnych, stacje metra, tutaj korytarze Dworca Centralnego mają zasadniczo nawierzchnię z płyt kamiennych (granitowych), a nie betonu. `surface=concrete` jest więc nie ma miejscu.
BCNorwich (2025-09-12 05:02:09+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

OSM maps ground truth, what is physically present at a place, and it must be verifiable to others who pass by. So I wonder, is there actually a language school here or is it an office in the bungalow?   I can see no evidence of a school.

Regards Bernard.
ilias_ (2025-09-12 06:58:07+00:00): Please discuss before making such big changes. Autoroute Urbaine is just a name and it's absolutely not an actual autoroute, you just have to drive on it to see it. Autoroutes are referenced such as A1, A2, A3, etc.
ilias_ (2025-09-12 06:59:39+00:00): Nevertheless, welcome to OSM.
Ouss_5 (2025-09-12 08:30:58+00:00): I use the road several times a month and I see many things that prove it is a motorway, such as the sign that prohibits trucks from driving in the third lane, which is only found on three-lane motorways like the Casablanca-Berrechid motorway and the orbital motorway. There is also a rest stop with a blue sign just like on other motorways, and all the entrances to this road, for example, if you are on 2 March Street and you want to go towards El Jadida, Rabat or another place in Casablanca, there is a motorway sign next to it, which means you will be using the motorway. I hope you understand that and thank you for your note.
ilias_ (2025-09-12 08:38:36+00:00): I see you already changed back the road to a motorway. Please at least wait for me to answer, let's not get into an edit war!
ilias_ (2025-09-12 08:40:51+00:00): What motorway signs are you talking about exactly? Motorway sings are blue, signs on the Urbaine are white. Example:

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=33.55733574775081&lng=-7.606979207207019&z=18.576405608437643&pKey=470225117402431&focus=photo&x=0.4972244621735865&y=0.5716274065291669&zoom=0
ilias_ (2025-09-12 08:41:26+00:00): Of course they will prohibit trucks to drive on the left lane, this is literally the busiest road in Morocco, it has nothing to do with motorways.
ilias_ (2025-09-12 08:44:21+00:00): Moreover, when you drive from Urbaine to Penetrante Ain Harrouda, you see a motorway sign, meaning the motorway starts there. Please, contributors before you know what they're doing.
ilias_ (2025-09-12 08:45:11+00:00): Moreover, speed is limited to 80. Have you ever seen an entire motorway in Morocco limited to 80?
ilias_ (2025-09-12 08:46:29+00:00): The Centre National d'Etudes et de Recherches Routières classified it as a national road, not a motorway, literally in 2025. See page 47

https://map.comptoir.net/maroc-reseau-routier-2025-01/docs/Atlas%20Routier%202024%20A3%20Janv%202025.pdf
ZeLonewolf (2025-09-21 14:30:36+00:00): Discussion at:

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/vandalism-user-keeps-changing-trunk-to-motorway

OSM's motorway definition at:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Ahighway%3Dmotorway
NeisBot (2025-09-11 17:38:15+00:00): Hi tangue, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Added traffic signals at intersections and removed redundant crossing tag"
RazR83 (2025-09-13 08:53:53+00:00): вул. Шевченка, 11, а не 9...
Marek-M (2025-09-12 08:07:52+00:00): Tutaj podobna pomyłka: https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/3678517080 - zamiana sklepu obuwniczego na Orlen Paczka w odległości 1500m od tego sklepu. To znowu pomyłka?
Dawid2849 (2025-09-13 15:24:36+00:00): To nie pomyłka, ten user bardzo do siebie wziął do serca zachowywanie historii :D
Marek-M (2025-09-12 08:04:42+00:00): Cześć, jakaś dziwna edycja Ci tutaj wyszła z tym węzłem: https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/12903162341 - zamieniłeś sklep abc przy Chrobrego na automat DHL BOX przy Długosza (odległość między punktami to 1400m). To chyba jest jakiś błąd?
silversurfer83 (2025-09-12 20:52:35+00:00): Hi :)

zu deinen Ladesäulen:

Stand der Diskussion bei OSM ist, dass zwei Ladesäulen in einer Ladestation zusammengefasst werden, so wie mehrere Zapfsäulen eine Tankstelle ergeben.
Vergleiche: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171796788
user_5359 (2025-09-12 07:00:55+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please move restaurant The Manufactory to the correct building. (it isn't part of the street)
user_5359 (2025-09-12 06:58:17+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I remove your speedlimit of 545 mph or 877.1 kmh. It's a bit too oversized for an asphalt road.
user_5359 (2025-09-12 07:02:25+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please move the camera on the correct side of the street.
literan (2025-09-11 19:02:59+00:00): я уже просил https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/115223254 не ставить лифты на пешеходных дорожках, потому что это не соответствует действительности (внесение выдуманных данных), и может повредить роутингу. Вы делаете это назло?
RFuser11 (2025-09-11 20:41:08+00:00): не нужно лишних эмоций.
там лифт не в стороне, как обычно в переходах, а прямо около лестницы. Зачем городить лишние тропы?
literan (2025-09-13 10:03:18+00:00): 1) Отрисовка лифта на пути пассажиров - это несоответствие реальным данным, внесение выдуманных данных. Все равно что ворота, которые на заборе рядом с шоссе, повесить на само шоссе.

2) установка лифта на основной путь может помешать роутингу


Если вы не желаете отрисовывать тщательно, то лучше вообще не трогайте. Никакой спешки нет.
literan (2025-09-13 10:05:32+00:00): > не нужно лишних эмоций.

хорошо, не хотите по совести, будет по закону
RFuser11 (2025-09-13 16:06:13+00:00): спасибо за ваши комментарии и отдельно за ваше мнение. Оно очень важно. Постараюсь вносить правки в более размеренном темпе
FroschForscher (2025-09-13 14:05:47+00:00): operator=Arverio Bayern
operator:wikidata=Q1152124 <-DB Vertrieb
brand=Deutsche Bahn
brand:wikidata=Q9322 <-Deutsche Bahn

Bitte nochmal prüfen, die operator Daten passen nicht zusammen.
VLD549 (2025-10-05 06:57:35+00:00): Hi, I was asked to verify name changes. In case a business has moved, I believe it is best to just map the new address, rather then changing the name. Is Was:Atol the new name?
Thank you for letting me know.
(I am not a mapper, but this is what I've seen from other mappers up to now)
Smx1 (2025-10-05 10:52:49+00:00): Hello, this business has moved to https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4756664914
I used 'was:' like I'have understood on the wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:was:*)

There is actually nothing in place of the old store
silversurfer83 (2025-09-12 20:38:36+00:00): Hi :)

ist dort nun etwas anderes? Oder wie sieht das Ladenlokal nun aus?

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171798528
YellowSoul (2025-10-23 08:41:25+00:00): Gilt das auch für Radfahrer oder ist es für Radfahrer in Gegenrichtung freigegeben?
Kaos_di (2025-10-23 08:59:06+00:00): Das gilt auch für Radfahrer. Allerdings wurde beim Gehweg links neben der Straße ein "Radfahrer frei" Schild angebracht.
eggie (2025-09-11 18:53:55+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback Alle adresnodes zijn import vanuit de BAG.. Liever niet zomaar aanpassen. Nu ontbreekt een adres. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-09-11 18:55:58+00:00): Dit was overigens geen BAG adresnode.. Dus no problem.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-09-11 18:51:02+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4414401692
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1429064344

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Szymson (2025-09-12 15:45:51+00:00): Po co dublujesz adresy?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4414401692
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1429064344
Sylabowy Kot (2025-09-13 22:51:15+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawny opis zmian. Przygotowałem listę stron do nauki poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Niektóre komentarze są bezużyteczne i nie dają żadnych korzyści.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian

Pozdrawiam! 🐈
SomeoneElse (2025-10-12 19:04:42+00:00): I suspect that "yes" makes no more sense than "3" here.  I suspect that "bus_bay" is a typing error for another tag, perhaps "width"?
The only way to be sure is to check with a local.  When I see "obviously wrong values like "bus_bay=3" but can't see what the mapper obviously meant, I leave the errors as they are so that in future QA tools will still find them.
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-10-13 07:02:41+00:00): I checked the history of the changed way, and it turns out that the street _does_ have a bus bay, and I used aerial imagery to determine which side(s) of it the bus bay is on.
SomeoneElse (2025-10-15 22:03:11+00:00): The bus bay isn't all the way up the street though?  Where did you see the bus bay?
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-10-16 03:22:49+00:00): I looked at it more closely using Bing Maps, and I couldn't find one. As a result, I removed the tag entirely.
Sylabowy Kot (2025-09-13 22:51:20+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawny opis zmian. Przygotowałem listę stron do nauki poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Niektóre komentarze są bezużyteczne i nie dają żadnych korzyści.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian

Pozdrawiam! 🐈
Sylabowy Kot (2025-09-13 22:51:24+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawny opis zmian. Przygotowałem listę stron do nauki poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Niektóre komentarze są bezużyteczne i nie dają żadnych korzyści.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian

Pozdrawiam! 🐈
Sylabowy Kot (2025-09-13 22:51:26+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawny opis zmian. Przygotowałem listę stron do nauki poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Niektóre komentarze są bezużyteczne i nie dają żadnych korzyści.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian

Pozdrawiam! 🐈
eggie (2025-09-11 18:58:28+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Sylabowy Kot (2025-09-13 22:51:28+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawny opis zmian. Przygotowałem listę stron do nauki poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Niektóre komentarze są bezużyteczne i nie dają żadnych korzyści.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian

Pozdrawiam! 🐈
Sylabowy Kot (2025-09-13 22:51:32+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawny opis zmian. Przygotowałem listę stron do nauki poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Niektóre komentarze są bezużyteczne i nie dają żadnych korzyści.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian

Pozdrawiam! 🐈
Sylabowy Kot (2025-09-13 22:51:35+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawny opis zmian. Przygotowałem listę stron do nauki poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Niektóre komentarze są bezużyteczne i nie dają żadnych korzyści.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian

Pozdrawiam! 🐈
user_5359 (2025-09-12 14:01:14+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1429066064. What is the mean of the key floor:count = 1? Is there any difference to building:levels?
plamen (2025-09-12 16:28:57+00:00): Yes, should be building:levels.
fortera_au (2025-09-11 22:59:26+00:00): Hi, it looks like this actually loops around to meet the main road again.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171799396
Prasanna Msamy (2025-10-15 17:35:10+00:00): Thank you for the valuable feedback. I have reverted the edit . I look forward to your suggestion/feedback in the future as well. Thank you
MorahT (2025-09-11 22:31:01+00:00): These are not all public bridleways.  You have added bicycle=designated tags to public footpaths too, which is incorrect and is going to send cyclists down routes they do not have legal access rights for.

You need to either:

1) Revert these all these edits and start again.

2) Go back through all the rights of way you have changed and remove the bicycle=designated tags from the public footpaths.

Glos PROW Map:
https://www.gloucestershire.gov.uk/prow/rights-of-way-online-map/

Wilts PROW Map:
https://wiltscouncil.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=43d5a86a545046b2b59fd7dd49d89d22
DocDirk (2025-09-12 15:45:35+00:00): The Countryside Act 1968 clarifies that horse riders, walkers and cyclists are permitted on rights-of-ways classified as bridle paths. They should all be "designated". I have found no errors to the bridleway edits. Let me know if you find a specific problem.
The tags, bicycles=yes added inadvertently to several footpaths have been reversed.
DaveF (2025-09-12 18:47:41+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/234778671
This path stopped at the admin boundary as the prow_ref only applies to that administration. You need to add a separate way the abuts it on the other side of the boundary.
DaveF (2025-09-12 18:54:47+00:00): There's no need for bicycle=no as highway=footway auto negates bicycles
aixbrick (2025-09-12 10:07:38+00:00): Hallo,
wenn du den Straßennamen korrigierst, musst du das bei allen Adressen der Häuser ebenfalls machen ("addr:street").
Gruß
Art4 (2025-09-12 12:32:11+00:00): Vielen Dank für den Hinweis. Ich habe das soeben in Changeset #171830056 erledigt. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171830056
aixbrick (2025-09-12 14:30:12+00:00): Danke
Moiety (2025-09-11 19:13:20+00:00): Volgens deze pagina kun je `landuse=greenery` gebruiken. Al zie ik het niet als groen op de kaart (iig niet in de editor). Klopt dit gebruik zo?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:landuse#landuse-greenery
eggie (2025-09-11 19:28:27+00:00): Je hebt de standaardlayer als achtergrond (Carto)

Die laat niet alles zien. Keuze van de kaartenmakers.
Pas wanneer een tag heel veel gebruikt wordt kunnen ze besluiten om iets te laten renderen. Hun keuze.
Er zijn meer kaartenmakers en dus ook meer kaarten. 
Wij keuren als community een tag goed en de kaartenmakers volgens (of niet)
Moiety (2025-09-12 08:32:08+00:00): Ah ja logisch ook natuurlijk. Dankjewel :)
Supaplex030 (2025-09-15 08:01:14+00:00): Hallo,
hier hast du an einem Stück der Revaler Straße (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1097482025) die recht neuen geschützten Radfahrstreifen wieder zu schmalen Hochbordradwegen "umgemappt". Vermutlich versehentlich? Habe es bereits wieder korrigiert.
lg, Alex
fmc_7 (2025-09-24 12:32:05+00:00): besten Dank.
puchaczowsky (2025-09-12 10:01:15+00:00): podawaliśmy Ci już wcześniej

jakaś blokada konta ma ci uświadomić że nie masz racji?
pavvv (2025-09-12 12:41:43+00:00): @Anazaar pokaż mi jedno miejsce w Polsce, gdzie usytuowanie kategorii wygląda w ten sam sposób
Anazaar (2025-09-12 16:05:09+00:00): …to może filozoficznie: skoro wszędzie jest jednakowo, to po co koś mapy?

Macie bardzo ograniczone pojmowanie map.

Zmieńcie sobie tą drogę nawet w ścieżkę do wyścigów psich zaprzęgów.

Pozdrawiam i miłego demolowania map.
pavvv (2025-09-12 18:51:30+00:00): Opowiadasz farmazony. Tu chodzi o to, że nigdzie nie ma tak, że nagle kończy się droga o wyższej kategorii na rondzie. Każda droga musi łączyć się z inną drogą o równej lub wyższej kategorii. Są od tego wyjątki, ale na pewno nie tu.
DariaDX (2025-12-17 21:03:58+00:00): Jedna droga jest dobrze zrobiona, to po co zmieniałeś to kilka razy. Jakim to trzeba być ancymonem, by to robić
user_5359 (2025-09-12 07:06:06+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don#T existing objects from the map. You can add acces=private for private streets. 
I have already done it.
custodiankeyy (2025-09-12 20:33:37+00:00): Bazı silinen yollar hava görüntüsünde hala gözüküyor. Yolların olmadığına emin misiniz?

Yollardan biri:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/850752402
user_5359 (2025-09-12 06:48:00+00:00): Welcome to OSM! 
Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/6738898866 more than 100 meters over streets and buildings. 
I moved the node back to the original position.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-03 03:38:20+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171800986

why you added "BN2 4BE" as name?
UtterClutter (2025-10-03 16:32:46+00:00): It's the post code of that residential area
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-06 17:57:58+00:00): but why you put as name of this area, in addition to tagging it as a post code?
UtterClutter (2025-10-06 23:44:51+00:00): Two reasons really, I am not adding a name as this already exists from where I subdivided a residential area, so I am renaming it to describe more precisely the area which it repesents.
Also, 'postal_code=' does not render in ID, wheras 'name=' does.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-07 17:46:43+00:00): > Also, 'postal_code=' does not render in ID, wheras 'name=' does.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Mistagging_for_the_renderer
UtterClutter (2025-10-08 22:13:28+00:00): I am well aware of this concept as I do a lot of 3D work.
Are you suggesting that I should remove legitimate detail in order to meet your demands?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-09 14:19:54+00:00): I am suggesting that it is an illegitimate detail, as postal code is not a name and is extremely unlikely to be used as a name

postal code should be added as postal code (with postal_code key) not as a name (with name key)
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-14 14:09:30+00:00): removed postal code from name field (already tagged as postal_code) in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173277730
Alliegaytor (2025-09-11 20:09:31+00:00): Hi, thanks for your contribution to OSM.

In this changeset you dragged a bunch of footpath nodes onto the road. See here: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=171801167 I've since fixed this.

This, along with other changesets you've made, have had similar issues between them. Please take care when adding driveways not to drag nodes away from where they should be.
fortera_au (2025-09-11 22:52:47+00:00): The driveway also only connects to the sidewalk, and not to the road. Uber editors have continuously made these mistakes while editing in Australia recently, please review all your recent edits and ensure these issues are fixed.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171801167
Prasanna Msamy (2025-10-15 17:23:04+00:00): Apologies for the mistake I committed. Thank you for the valuable feedback. I look forward to your suggestion/feedback in the future as well. 
Thank you.
NeisBot (2025-09-11 19:58:35+00:00): Hi NRmapper, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 87% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 88 building(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=171801177
NRmapper (2025-09-15 11:25:13+00:00): These were intentional deletions. Another mapper seems to have used another imagery and entered numerous faulty buildings.
AwFi (2025-09-11 21:21:45+00:00): Ciao, 
Ho visto che stai mappando parecchi segnali ferroviari in veneto e la cosa mi fa molto piacere! Mi permetto solo di avvisarti che sulla wiki la forma della vela tonda è identificata con "round" e non "circle" come stai facendo, se ne può discutere comunque. 
Se hai suggerimenti per la wiki fammi pure sapere. 
Se ti interessa c'è anche un gruppo telegram dedicato a OSM sulle ferrovie italiane, ti lascio il link nel caso ne fossi interessato: https://t.me/OSMFerroviarioIT
Buon mapping!
AwFi
AwFi (2025-09-11 21:23:15+00:00): PS:
Ho visto che in alcune ref dei pba, forse non in questo changeset,  hai anche messo la P nel codice. A me pare che quella P sia della permissività e non del codice stesso... ma potrei anche sbagliare.
Supaplex (2025-09-12 04:59:13+00:00): 已經有加full-name=快速公路五股土城線了
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171801731
UtterClutter (2025-09-11 21:02:04+00:00): Nice work Paul.
What is the process of doing that?
Paul Flo Williams (2025-09-11 21:36:01+00:00): Using Rob's visualisation of the Open UPRN data: https://osm.mathmos.net/addresses/uprn/

It's rather manual, though. I have Rob's tools open in one tab and iD editor in the other, and copy across UPRNs where there is a single UPRN for a building and the centroid exactly matches. I always find on a survey that some buildings haven't been split yet, so I use StreetComplete to make the house number something like "7,9" and edit the outlines later. The UPRN tool found some places where I'd forgotten the "later" bit :-)
Paul Flo Williams (2025-09-11 21:38:43+00:00): You can also see UPRNs for buildings that no longer exist, so you have to be careful to avoid these. For example, in Peacehaven, plenty of single houses on a plot have been demolished and two put in its place. The UPRN tool may well show 3 UPRNs in this case, so I check the centroids to determine the correct UPRN. In some cases, the centroid seems a little off, but then I find that the outline needs adjusting from the aerial imagery; someone might have just plonked a rectangle there in the first place.
BCNorwich (2025-09-12 05:19:11+00:00): Hi, The church building is alreaddy mapped so I've added you new tags to it. OSM policy is  "One feature, one OSM element", please see:- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element

Regards Bernard.
eggie (2025-09-11 20:58:42+00:00): commentaar moet zijn node verschoven.
Andrea Musuruane (2025-09-12 06:40:49+00:00): Hi! What's your data source for these POIs since you didn't directly survey them? BR, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171803353
wegavision (2025-09-12 07:17:55+00:00): The data is from my contacts at the guesthouses. The exact location was explored, partly through the pictures I received from the operators. This is the case, for example, with 13137029632, where you can see the house on the aerial photo.
Okay, “survey” isn't quite right, but I do it out of habit because I always map using my own pictures. I'll do that after my trip too, then I'll have the relevant pictures.
jhaluska80 (2025-09-14 20:26:53+00:00): Thanks for contributing.  

Try not to delete roads/paths/buildings that still exist on the ground.  Instead change access and other tags and other tags to prevent routing through them.  It's a common mistake.

I have resolved the issue for you.