piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Romaine2 (2026-05-16 14:08:52+00:00): Ten aanzien van Jeanne d'Arc College aan Grote Gracht 76: je hebt een bijgewerkte versie overschreven met een verouderde versie die niet klopt, zou je dit kunnen herstellen? Het pand achter Grote Gracht 82 is namelijk één geheel met Grote Gracht 82 aan de straatzijde en niet met Jeanne d'Arc College + de vorm van Jeanne d'Arc College klopte niet.
Romaine2 (2026-05-16 14:12:01+00:00): Ten aanzien van Grote Gracht 90-92: pand zit vast aan de Turnzaal die er achter ligt, ook hier is de BAG verouderd, kun je dit herstellen?
JanWandelaar (2026-05-17 17:29:53+00:00): Helaas weet ik niet hoe ik oude versies terug kan halen van een pand. Er staat ook de source=BAG op, het is handiger om dat weg te halen als de source geen BAG meer is.
Het eenvoudigste is via de https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/ een terugmelding te doen als de BAG niet klopt. Meestal wordt dat in Maastricht binnen een paar dagen verwerkt en kan ik het pand aanpassen.
Romaine2 (2026-05-20 12:29:41+00:00): Oké, daar kwam ik ook niet aan uit. Ik heb het daarom opnieuw ingetekend.
iandees (2026-03-23 23:20:47+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4228217638 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180329450, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
marc__marc (2026-04-08 09:27:39+00:00): Bonjour,
n'hésites pas à garder l'historique en réutilisant le noeud précédent au lieu de l'effacer.
cependant je me demande quel est la source réelle de la géométrie vu que ni l'imagerie aérienne ni le PICC ne contienne l'information en ce moment vu que c'est ultra récent
Cordialement,
Marc
AurélienQ (2026-04-08 18:54:44+00:00): Hello,
Sur le principe de conserver les nœuds, je suis d'accord. Sauf qu'en réalité c'est malheureusement une grosse perte de temps. Donc autant quand il n'y a pas besoin de les déplacer de beaucoup ou qu'il ne sont pas en grand nombre, je le fait, autant ici il aurait fallu les déplacer de beaucoup, et je trouve cela assez casse-pied.

Pour la source, j'ai checké les vues satellites Sentinelles 2. Et bien qu'elles ne soient pas très précises, j'ai pu voir clairement que les panneaux sont disposés selon un rectangle orienté vers le sud aussi grand que possible par la taille du lac. Donc c'est ce que j'ai fait (à quelques mètres près, à préciser lorsqu'une vue précises sera dispo).

Cordialement,
Aurélien
marc__marc (2026-04-09 07:46:19+00:00): Bonjour,

Merci pour ton retour.

une grande perte de temps de déplacer UN nœud au lieu de l'effacer ?
c'est un argument étrange.
D'autant que la préservation de l'historique n'est pas fait pour gagner du temps (sinon tout le monde effacerait)

comment as-tu accédé à Sentinelles 2 dans iD ? je ne le vois pas renseigné dans les listes d'image utilisées ni dans la liste des couches disponible

Cordialement,
Marc
AurélienQ (2026-04-10 12:10:42+00:00): Les imageries ne sont pas dispos sur iD (tu remarqueras par ailleurs que j'ai utilisé JOSM). J'admets ne pas être certain qu'on ait le droit d'utiliser les imagerie, mais le contraire m’étonnerai vu le principe des missions sentinelles.

En effet sur iD supprimer un noeud n'a aucun intérêt temporel, mais la puissance de JOSM change tout. C'est d'ailleurs un "problème" déjà connu et documenté sur le wiki (j'étais tombé sur une page le mentionnant un jour).

Par ailleurs, à partir du moment où les coordonnées des nœuds ne sont pas conservés dans l'historique, je vois peu d’intérêt à les conserver lorsque leur rôle se cantonne à être partie d'un chemin. (pour le coup je serais curieux de connaitre comment ça fonctionne si ce n'est pas le cas).

Bonne journée,
Aurélien

PS : le lien vers l'imagerie sentinelle : browser.dataspace.copernicus.eu
marc__marc (2026-04-10 13:16:21+00:00): Pour l'éditeur, en effet erreur de ma part.
mais du coup le champs source ne détruit pas la source utilisée, c'était cela qui provoque les questions

l'intérêt que je vois à la conservation de l’historique est qu'on peux facilement trouver depuis quand l'objet existe dans osm. retrouver par exemple les tags du changeset de l'objet d'origine sans devoir analyer les changset pour voir si un objet supprimé a une partie des mêmes tags que celui de l’objet existant.
tandis que la conservation du noeud d'origine se voit tout de suite quand on sélectionne le way (l'id du noeud d'origine est le plus petit, très différent des autes qui ont tous été créé en même temps).

merci pour le lien sentinelle, je vais aller voir cela
Wildsharky (2026-03-25 10:23:03+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:180343830
Jason Graham (2026-03-25 13:02:09+00:00): Hey, I'm not sure why you reverted this; the Huntington and Broad Top Railroad has been transformed into a rail trail called the H&BT Trail. Between Warriors' Path State Park and Riddlesburg the map is not displaying correctly. South of Riddlesburg you have correctly displayed the trail but it should connect up to exactly where the "Huntington & Broad Top Mountain Railroad Grade" is on the map
ticho2 (2026-03-26 13:44:43+00:00): Ahoj, neviem ci by som toto https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1491971207 nazval "natural wood", su to klasicke ludmi vysadene stromy (aj ked niektore pred vela rokmi) okolo panelakov.

Mozno by stalo zvazit skor managed forest, alebo park, kedze hustota tych stromov nie je nejaka velka?
aceman444 (2026-04-03 15:19:33+00:00): Suhlasim so skutkovym stavom, ale v OSM sa uz dnes natural=wood dava na cokolvek "kde su stromy". Uz to davno neznamena prirodny nedotknuty prales.
Ale ak preferujete niektory iny zo 6 sposobov znacenia podla https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Forest tak to kludne zmente.
ticho2 (2026-04-03 17:38:59+00:00): Ja by som to najradsej nechal ako park, podobne ako je to tu vsade naokolo, kde je podobna hustota stromov medzi panelakmi. Akurat mozno nechat les na tej malej juhovychodnej casti skolskeho pozemku kde nie je trava.

Urcite mi neprijde spravne natahovat tam polygon lesa cez existujuci polygon parku ako je to teraz.
aceman444 (2026-04-03 18:00:18+00:00): Ok. Ale park podla wiki ma splnat, ze stromy v nom su upravovane. Cize z toho pohladu sa park a les nemaju prekryvat, lebo v lese stromy nie su upravovane. Ja som to daval len z toho pohladu, ze je to park a je pokryty stromami. Lebo moze byt aj park bez stromov. Ale teda mozeme to rozlisit.
ticho2 (2026-04-03 18:36:07+00:00): Ja myslim ze taketo stromove porasty medzi panelakmi toto zvacsa splnaju - raz za cas tam mesto predsa robi udrzbu zelene, inak by to zarastalo krikmi, hromazdili by sa tam suche konare, a podobne.

Samozrejme, neplati to na divokejsie porasty, ako napriklad kusok severne, okolo parku Liscie udolie, a Nad Sitinou. To uz su lesy.
aceman444 (2026-04-03 19:04:49+00:00): Nemam s tym problem, aj ked zase mi pride divne nazyvat vsetky tie plochy medzi panelakmi parkami. Na druhej strane v Bratislave nimi asi aj su, su tam cielene vysadene a udrziavane stromy, lavicky, niekde ihriska. Oficialne ich mesto mozno parkami nevola, ale zrejme pravidla OSM pre leisure=park by to aj splnalo.
ticho2 (2026-04-03 21:20:16+00:00): Suhlas, ja by som tiez mnohe leisure=park plochy na Dlhych Dieloch, ale aj inde, najradsej preklasifikoval na landuse=grass, ale park ma tu vyhodu ze zahrna aj moznost ze su tam stromy, takze tie netreba potom zakreslovat zvlast.

Je to dilema. :)
user_1417746 (2026-03-23 20:04:31+00:00): also place = town oder village?
Pete Owens (2026-03-25 01:55:28+00:00): Have the dismount signs been removed?
There were still there a few months ago when I last checked.
marczoutendijk (2026-03-27 19:49:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180519108 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for evading previous block
mcld (2026-04-11 13:53:21+00:00): Ben je zeker dat die gebouw nummer 115A is? Ik zie "source: BAG" maar Naturrmonumenten denkt dat het address nummber 117 is (via het website) en dus heb ik die voor gebruikt.
A67-A67 (2026-04-12 21:42:25+00:00): Volgens de BAG (officiële overheidsdatabase) is dit gebouw nummer 115A en is 117 Chalet d'n Observant, ten zuiden van hier.

De website van Natuurmonumenten zegt: 
Startlocatie ENCI-groeve (Chalet d'n Observant)
Lage Kanaaldijk 117, 6212 NA Maastricht (LB)

Nummer 117 is dus de startlocatie, waar je kan parkeren, niet het adres van dit gebouw.
mcld (2026-04-13 19:23:11+00:00): Ah, ja. Dat klopt.
SekeRob (2026-05-03 06:38:29+00:00): Hi,

v.v. this turn restriction https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18628308/history/3 , no idea why you deleted the 'via' node from the no-left and then in the next edit inserted a *second* 'from', but it got flagged by QA since that edit. Don't k now if it's signed or if the road has a solid_line divider, but logically one would map a only straight on here and if unsigned/marked add an implicit=yes since it would be for road safety, were it not that no nav prog is able to respond in time to plan a new route after a direction mistake and trying to get back to the planned route.

Anyway,  I put the 'via' back and removed the second 'from'. If you don't agree, than please provide the motivation.

happy mapping
SekeRob

PS looked up turn restrictions... double from is kind of special for no-entry situations. A via can be on a way which I do now and then if it's a 2 step, you can even have multiple via e.g. from-via-via-to, but from-from-to makes no sense.
impiaaa (2026-03-24 17:51:49+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Please use the changeset description to describe what you changed and why. This makes it easier to review changes for quality. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments for some more guidance and examples. Also, OpenStreetMap is a map of the world as it is today, not places that used to exist. For historical places, you may be interested in OpenHistoricalMap: https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/
iandees (2026-03-23 23:20:38+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13136808695 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180329443, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
SekeRob repair (2026-03-24 08:58:31+00:00): Hi there Lola Fox

Question/Comment: Don't know why you chose to tag all there meadows/cultivated land of which many parts look more like cropped farmland as natural=grassland (with lots of buildings/farmyards spread around), but I think it's wrong. It is at the minimum NOT natural, but all man employed landuse=meadow + meadow=agricultural with significant parts landuse=farmland. (See Mapbox 2026 image layer for newest, Italy wide hi resolution aerials)
Also. There is no reason at all to map this as some monster multipolygon already at 300 members. All these parcels can be mapped as regular polygons without any need to cut it up. It makes future maintenance by other mappers when the use changes in parts much, much more easy. Since there is the follow/trace function in JOSM, Vespucci, ID Editor the drawing, even when there are many nodes in a single way, super fast and easy to update.

happy mapping
SekeRob
Lola Fox (2026-03-24 19:35:39+00:00): Thank you for your feedback. For the future I'll make multypoligons with less members.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2026-04-20 11:16:12+00:00): Hi,
Regarding https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/296533884
This seems not segregated. Should width be used instead of cycleway:width then?
Zverik (2026-04-20 11:24:32+00:00): In this specific case, yes, those are the same. But generally I use `cycleway:width` for the narrowest point on the way, considering lamp posts and fences. So it all depends on a location.
iandees (2026-03-23 23:20:30+00:00): Hello! I noticed that nodes https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4261240672, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5826816665 were moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180329438, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
nullroute (2026-03-25 14:56:31+00:00): Hi VLD298,

I think you made some changes here using out-of-date imagery. The zoo has undergone a lot of changes in the last few years.

You added a footway which goes through a couple of the buildings (Administration and Zoo Store).

Would you be able to review your changes against newer imagery? I think Mapbox is a good choice.

Thanks,
nullroute
VLD298 (2026-03-25 16:24:08+00:00): Hello nullroute, 

I apologize for my mistake and have readjusted the footways to align with the newer mapbox imagery. Thank you for letting me know! 

VLD298 / Lauren
IreuN (2026-04-08 21:41:19+00:00): Kolego, ale nie robimy highway=service w połączeniu z area=yes
IreuN (2026-04-08 21:43:18+00:00): Raczej użyj do tego area:highway=*
eggie (2026-03-23 21:47:27+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback   .. De toegangsweg heb ik iets opgeschoven en losgemaakt van de landuse.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
mga_geo (2026-03-24 05:52:31+00:00): Bonjour,
Attention les relations c'est fragile!
Les 2 relations "Car BreizhGo 921" ne sont plus continues: r13436685 et r13436686.
Pouvez-vous corriger ?
Marc
Nomel (2026-03-24 06:11:13+00:00): Bonjour Marc ! Bien vu, merci, c'est corrigé. D'habitude, j'ai l'impression que "saucissonner" une route ne casse pas la relation. Je ferai gaffe !
Bonne journée
mga_geo (2026-03-24 08:07:04+00:00): Ce n'est toujours pas gagné: https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/FR/BRE/FR-BRE-BREIZHGO_CAR_29-Analysis.html
Il n'y a plus les deux voies et la voie restante est à sen unique.
mga_geo (2026-03-24 08:11:35+00:00): Je viens de dire une bêtise, PTNA était en échec avec l'overpass
Marek-M (2026-03-24 09:48:30+00:00): Dzięki. Niezła skucha z mojej strony!👋
NeisBot (2026-03-23 22:03:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/9692579324 v10

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Jewelry store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisAgent (2026-03-23 23:33:27+00:00): 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again?
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-05 07:49:11+00:00): Cleaned up remaining SEO spam and other mistagging for POI in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/185126960
iandees (2026-03-23 23:20:22+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13256592810 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180329435, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
Municipality_of_Tuzi_Official (2026-03-24 18:23:53+00:00): Thank you so much!
Jordi MF (2026-03-23 23:06:07+00:00): Hola Ricardo,
Gràcies per millorar OSM, en concret, les dades d'Alcoi.
He vist que estàs modificant algunes places i que estàs demanant una revisió. Efectivament, les places etiquetades com a place=square són aquelles places "quadrades" i envoltades d'edificis. està bé etiquetar-les com a area=yes + highway=pedestrian. Tanmteix, cal anar amb compte amb l'etiqueta leisure=park perquè el concepte de "park" en OSM és diferent al que utilitzem en la parla cotidiana. Un "park", en OSM és una àrea relativament extensa on predomina la vegetació semisilvestre i on solen haver caminets pels quals passejar. Com a exemples, en Alcoi, podem incloure el de Batoi, el Romeral o similars. Per tant, les zones que no compleixen stes característiques i en les que hi ha una gran part de superfície ocupada per rajoles o ciment, no és convenient etiquetar-les com a "park".

Ací tens una explicació més extensa: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=park

Moltes gràcies, benvingut i bon mapeig!
Jarek 🚲 (2026-04-21 15:56:18+00:00): Hi, in this change you set what was previously mapped as sidewalks along west side of Jane Street and north side of York Gate Boulevard (this one for example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1182511347) to be multi-use paths (specifically designated for riding cyclists and pedestrians), with segregated=yes meaning there is a painted separating the cyclists and the pedestrians. In City's aerial imagery as of July 2025, these look like ordinary sidewalks, not MUPs, and with no separation. Are these really rebuilt as full MUPs, or are they still sidewalks and there are also bike lanes?
Jordi MF (2026-03-23 23:08:06+00:00): Ho he revisat i és correcte afegir el nom popular local del pont com a loc_name=*.
Salut
cartografy (2026-03-23 22:50:37+00:00): Source correction: Mapbox Satellite in conjunction with Vantor satellite imagery via Vantor Hub 2025-03-20, Strava
maro21 (2026-03-24 20:17:47+00:00): Are you aware of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct ?
Fjana (2026-03-24 21:14:14+00:00): Hello. I am aware of the code. I have discussed my edits in the Czech OSM community Email list, and initially got no reply. When I asked again, I received an answer confirming this proposed scheme I have sent out.

Is there a rule I unknowingly broke? I was trying to follow the guidelines, but it may be possible I have accidentally misunderstood them.

If there is an issue, I am sincerely sorry.
Fjana (2026-03-24 21:31:22+00:00): I've looked through the code of conduct again, and I've missed that wiki part. I'm really sorry for this, I've read it on the past and recalled these edits being up for discussion, but forgot about that part. 

I'm really sorry for my erraneous recalling, and if you wish to revert my edits, feel free to do so. I've added two tags which were empty in all cases before - official_status and border_type.

I've made sure to validate in JOSM that these relations did not have these tags filled in before so there was no overwriting.

I'm sincerely sorry.
maro21 (2026-03-24 21:42:53+00:00): Thank you for you reply.
In cases like this - 10000 edited objects it is an automated/mechanical edit. It should be discussed and approved by the local community. After it, there should be a Wiki page about it and it should be linked in the changesets.
Take a look at this example of model automatic editing: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178837939 - it is clearly marked and includes a link to the Wiki.

You can make up for it by creating a page on the Wiki that includes a link to the community discussion, and then adding a link to the Wiki page as a comment in the changesets you've already uploaded.

I won't revert these edits because I don't map in the Czech Republic :). But you have an example now and you know how to make such edits in the future :) It doesn't have to be the same as in the above mentioned changeset - a link do the Wiki in a separate tag would be enough, sth like wiki=https://... or discussion=https://...
Fjana (2026-03-25 10:03:07+00:00): Created the page:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edits/Fjana/add_border_type_to_boundaries_in_Czechia
maro21 (2026-03-28 17:47:37+00:00): Great, thanks!
Fjana (2026-03-25 11:44:28+00:00): See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edits/Fjana/add_border_type_to_boundaries_in_Czechia
muralito (2026-03-24 00:34:24+00:00): Hola BigKiev. Creo que deberias dejar de hacer estas "correcciones". Esto no es asi, Da Silva. De León, son apellidos donde la D va con mayúsculas.

Me gustaría conocer la fuente de información que estás usando para estos cambios, porque ahi estaría el origen del problema...
muralito (2026-03-24 00:39:38+00:00): O De Oliveira, o Do Santos, De Souza, o De Simone, o De Brum, De Feo, Da Costa, Do Carmo, y podría seguir enumerando, son apellidos de diversos orígenes, español, italiano, vasco/francés, portugués/brasileño, y todos, pero todos esos y muchos otros mas van con la D en mayúscula.
muralito (2026-03-24 00:41:37+00:00): De los Santos, o De la Cruz, si, la L se escribe en minúsculas, pero la D siempre es en mayúsculas, y la ultima componente del apellido tambíen.
DressyPear4 (2026-03-23 23:24:50+00:00): Verifique as vias próximas para definir a classificação,  e pelas imagens ainda nem estão prontas
LordGarySugar (2026-03-27 01:54:51+00:00): Hi, just a note to say we can't use Google Street View for mapping, or other copyrighted maps https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Don%27t_copy_from_other_maps
Tom of Essex (2026-04-22 02:05:32+00:00): I'll bear this in mind in the future, my apologies. If it is of any benefit, I visited the area on business in February so I do recall some of the areas from memory, but used GM as confirmation. Regardless, my apologies for this.
LordGarySugar (2026-04-24 02:31:18+00:00): That's ok, if you've visited somewhere and use google maps to e.g. check a spelling that's fine, but generally as it's copyrighted we can't use it.
gurglypipe (2026-03-24 07:58:23+00:00): Heya, are you sure the Facebook address is correct for this pub? It leads to a page about The Dispensary in Heysham. :)
Adze1 (2026-03-24 13:51:46+00:00): Oops! Thanks. I'll remove it. Was looking at The Dispensary at the same time as they're under same ownership.
gurglypipe (2026-03-24 16:25:45+00:00): Super, thanks for fixing it!
Fjana (2026-03-25 11:44:25+00:00): See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edits/Fjana/add_border_type_to_boundaries_in_Czechia
Fjana (2026-03-25 11:44:22+00:00): See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edits/Fjana/add_border_type_to_boundaries_in_Czechia
mueschel (2026-03-27 11:20:37+00:00): Hi,
what is this 'feature_id'? This tag isn't used in other places.
Necessarycoot72 (2026-03-27 14:02:54+00:00): oops that's supposed to be gnis:feature_id. Thanks for catching that.
Wildsharky (2026-03-25 10:28:04+00:00): Revert of 180328957
eggie (2026-03-24 07:42:22+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback. Is deze bushalte nog in gebruik. Anders wellicht beter disused:highway  gebruiken.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
ajmat (2026-03-24 05:32:44+00:00): Reverted in changeset id: 180335033
Ltrlg (2026-04-03 07:22:04+00:00): Ce « Chatenay » sans accent a-t-il une quelconque réalité sur le terrain (en dehors d’une simple erreur ortho/typo), qui justifierait d’ajouter alt_name=* ainsi ? Et si oui, pourquoi ne pas généraliser aux autres segments de l’avenue ?
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-03-24 08:17:05+00:00): see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/whats-everyones-problem-with-name-de/142456/71 for more info

maybe it actually qualifies for name:de but editor adding name:de claimed otherwise