piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-02 08:25:12+00:00): Skąd informacja o istnieniu https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13273046032/history#map=19/50.079939/19.921197 się wzięła? To drzewo jest niestety wycięte
Deftax (2025-11-02 11:41:19+00:00): Dzięki za poprawkę - musiałem użyć starszych zdjęć satelitarnych, bo na nowych ten obszar był niewidoczny przez cień budynku
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-02 21:51:10+00:00): ogólnie, w Polsce bardzo często (a już na pewno w Krakowie) zdjęcia z geoportalu są często najlepsze
woodpeck (2025-11-02 19:22:45+00:00): Hello tomassvo, you have managed to open over 60 changesets here in two minutes. I don't know a lot about Street Complete EE but it must be possible to configure it to group related edits. It would be great if you could do that in the future.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-05 21:12:32+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10205355086/history has bicycle:repair = yes that was added in this edit
service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with changing this tagging to a more popular version?

I think that in this case difference in key names are minimal, and benefit from easier use of data would be greater

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bicycle:repair and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:service:bicycle:repair
ArtCakeGIS (2025-10-31 21:23:00+00:00): Mapping out forested areas per imagery. Some shrub becomes dense and gets hard to interpret vs forested.
yasslay (2025-11-01 19:46:43+00:00): Hi jajanja3,

Could you please avoid placing excessive nodes on lines, please? It makes the area really hard to work with especially if you're working with small features like fences and tight bends etc. It'd be much appreciated.

Best regards
jajanja3 (2025-11-01 19:52:00+00:00): Hi, 

I will take this feedback in and work with it the next time I edit. Thanks for your feedback.
treestryder (2026-05-10 02:43:37+00:00): Why cycleway and not path?
A cycleway is only for bicycles and would not normally have restriction tags added. Essentially, the same as highway=path + bicycle=designated
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Michigan#Paths_/_Trails
treestryder (2026-05-10 02:48:08+00:00): Also... I know why you are adding them, but technically, restrictions like horse=no and motor_vehicle=no are redundant when "designated" is used.
infeeeee (2025-10-31 22:53:54+00:00): Szia!

Okospadok címkézéséhez itt vannak példák: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hungary/Jelölési_példák#Pad

Manufacturert, model-t ugyanúgy kéne hívni, hogy megtalálható legyen, hogy ez ugyanaz.

További jó térképezést!
Bence_ (2025-11-01 05:42:52+00:00): Szia,
Javítottam, köszi
NeatNit (2025-11-03 10:58:56+00:00): Hi, thanks for your contributions. I fixed some of your mistakes: most importantly, you moved a bus stop accidentally when trying to drag the map. Please be mindful of this next time! Thanks again for improving the map :)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174141705
NeisBot (2025-10-31 22:15:35+00:00): Hi CV-Paz del Chaco, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 96% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
No primary map features!?

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=174040759
jeslop (2025-11-02 14:32:27+00:00): Hola CV-Paz del Chaco. ¿Podrías explicar los motivos del borrado masivo de datos en esta tu primera edición?
Un saludo,

Jesús López en nombre del Data Working Group de la OpenStreetMap Foundation
Yog Sot (2025-11-01 10:32:47+00:00): pokasowałeś traffic_island? xD
Przywróć https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:traffic%20calming=island?uselang=pl
IreuN (2025-11-01 12:48:47+00:00): Pokasowałem bo było błedne
IreuN (2025-11-01 12:49:59+00:00): Przeczytaj to co podlinkowałeś - w szczególności to co jest napisane BOLDEM. Wysepka drogowa która po prostu rozprowadza ruch nie powinna być tagowana jako traffic_calming
literan (2025-11-02 10:44:24+00:00): наигрались - вот и исчезли
Baloo Uriza (2025-11-03 16:37:32+00:00): So you're trying to delete this camera entirely?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174041080
Choose Freedom (2025-11-03 21:18:04+00:00): Yes, correct.
Baloo Uriza (2025-11-04 00:54:08+00:00): Got it.  You had only removed the direction and operator from it.  I just deleted the entire camera.
NeisBot (2025-10-31 22:46:46+00:00): Hi priness, welcome to the OSM projekt and thanks for your contribution!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish
NeisBot (2025-10-31 22:46:46+00:00): Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added education area with building name"
vng_me (2025-11-01 00:56:38+00:00): Your changeset is not good:
- Please, read the OSM Wiki about tags. natural=coastline is not suitable here
- Add type defining tags if the point ("Localita mercury") means something (hotel, shop, amenity, etc)
oba510 (2025-11-01 13:09:14+00:00): Hi, something went wrong here and in some of your (and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/atticquilt 's, who it looks like you're working with?) other edits to San Pablo Ave.  There were a bunch of random-looking segments of streets that were deleted here, and multiple overlapping crossing ways and sidewalks created over several changesets.  
I reverted the most problematic changesets, but it seems like there's a problem in your mapping process somewhere.
atticquilt (2025-11-03 16:54:05+00:00): Sorry for the confusion. Can you provide a little more detail on what the issues were? It was a pretty basic edit to add sidewalks to San Pablo.
voltairovicz (2025-10-31 23:54:52+00:00): A bezkolizyjny odcinek Jacka Kuronia z wiaduktami patrzy i nie dowierza
theDM (2025-11-01 00:22:17+00:00): Od tego jest wątek o trunku, to w sumie tam można omawiać poszczególne propozycje. DK 12 byłą jedną z propozycji do głosowania jako ważnościowa droga. Pytaj bardziej @pavvv jako pomysłodawcę.
AssisFS (2025-11-03 20:41:32+00:00): Boa tarde caro amigo! Tudo bem? Espero que sim! 
Apenas gostaria de lhe comunicar que a pista de pouso, localizada na comunidade Indígena do Kauwê em Pacaraima, na verdade se trata de uma pista de corrida de cavalos, muito comum aqui em Roraima e que por vezes, pode ser confundida com uma pista aeronáutica. 
Abraço e boas edições!!
Wilmer Osario (2025-11-04 22:16:44+00:00): Gracias 👍
Myazyk (2025-11-01 11:18:11+00:00): Ця назва є недоречною
Pamey44 (2025-11-01 16:43:34+00:00): аругемнти?
Pamey44 (2025-11-01 16:43:47+00:00): *аргументи?
Myazyk (2025-11-01 17:06:51+00:00): Застаріла і неактуальна
theDM (2025-11-01 00:08:43+00:00): https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1CtDYVI5mg1eUQIecsA9juDmmLPNxyTpVm20aVAA1YJI/edit?gid=0#gid=0
First, learn what was elected in voting.
Yog Sot (2025-11-01 00:12:53+00:00): this road function is `primary right now . It connect larget towns. Those are official OSM rules. It also is not international (E). 
A new road might be built and then it will be of national importance, but it'd not there yet
theDM (2025-11-01 00:15:04+00:00): Then mention it to pavvv who defined importance-based way of using trunk. That road was on his list.
voltairovicz (2025-11-01 00:23:00+00:00): Łódź - Kijów. A wiesz ze z Łodzi do Kijowa można jechać przez Tomaszów, DK48 i dw740 I jest szybciej? Serio, ta zmiana powinna być na nowo zweryfikowana i przedyskutowana
voltairovicz (2025-11-01 00:25:33+00:00): Przy okazji przy edycji theDM się jakieś adresy z Radomia pousuwaly. Nie wiem o co chodzi
Yog Sot (2025-11-01 00:46:20+00:00): @v, tak.. wśród 1000+ zmian cieżko wykryć co tam się właściwie zrobiło. Bardzo cieżko to zweryfikować. Łatwiej gdyby takie ważne zmiany wprowadzała osoba z doświadczeniem i zaufaniem, bo ja sam nie wiem czy przypadkiem coś się nie schrzaniło
NeisBot (2025-10-31 23:56:46+00:00): Hola ARROYO17, bienvenido al proyecto OSM y gracias por tu contribución.

Para hacer que la colaboración sea más fácil y ayudar a los demás a entender tus ediciones, es mejor agregar una breve descripción de los cambios que hiciste. Los comentarios claros ayudan a la comunidad a seguir tu trabajo y a proporcionar mejores comentarios. Puedes encontrar consejos para escribir buenos comentarios aquí[1].
(Auto-translation)
---
Hi ARROYO17, welcome to the OSM projekt and thanks for your contribution!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish
NeisBot (2025-10-31 23:56:49+00:00): Aquí está un comentario de ejemplo basado en tus ediciones del mapa: "Agregué cruce sin control con marcas"
(Auto-translation)
---
Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added uncontrolled crossing with markings"
Myazyk (2025-11-01 11:17:03+00:00): Чому то вони неіснуючі?
Pamey44 (2025-11-01 16:45:59+00:00): не враховані геологічні/морфологічні чинники, мені вже доводилось зносити намальовані хребти цим користувачем, що проводив їх так як йому хотілось
Myazyk (2025-11-01 16:58:49+00:00): "цей користувач, що проводив їх так як йому хотілось" - один із найдосвіченіших маперів ОСМ
olehz (2025-11-03 06:14:36+00:00): Хребти бути проведені по даних Сopernicus DEM. Наведи фактори, якими ти керуєшся при визначенні існування чи неіснування хребта?
user_5359 (2025-11-01 07:56:07+00:00): Welcome to OSM! 
Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/434668708 more than 100 meters over streets and buildings. 
I moved the node back to the original position.
Yog Sot (2025-11-01 00:09:16+00:00): > highway	primary	way	The next most important roads in a country's system. (Often link larger towns.)

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway

> highway	trunk	way	The most important roads in a country's system that aren't motorways. (Need not necessarily be a divided highway.)


This road is not the most important. A different one might be if it gets built. 
This road is also not internationally ( E ) important

Discuss before you change.
pavvv (2025-11-01 08:41:09+00:00): No i po co to robisz? Zmiana została przedyskutowana, więc bez sensu to piszesz. A po drugie poczytaj sobie o tym co to Via Carpatia.
dzamper (2025-11-03 15:05:57+00:00): Czy ten revert zmian https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173979839 autorstwa theDM przed wykonaniem reverta?
user_5359 (2025-11-01 08:17:36+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on  https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dsurveillance for a better description
berndw (2025-11-01 08:15:27+00:00): Hallo, Gehtdichnixan, willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.

Ich habe eine Frage, naja, eher eine Feststellung, wurde das Haus abgerissen?

Oder eher nur die Webseite still gelegt?

Ich werde das Changeset revertieren, aber die Webseite entfernen.

Falls es Einwände geben sollte einfach hier antworten.


Happy mapping
SomeoneElse (2025-11-01 01:00:50+00:00): Actually, news reports https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ckvgwpdnk07o suggest it closed last year.  That would explain the lack of branding!  See also https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4430138 .
NeisBot (2025-11-01 01:27:41+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Marcela Giocanti dress store"
NeisBot (2025-11-01 01:27:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description
NeisRevert (2025-11-01 18:48:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/174076094
where the changeset comment is: 
Remove unclear map edits
NeisRevert (2025-11-01 18:48:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/174076109
where the changeset comment is: 
Remove unclear map edits
wolfy1339 (2025-11-06 17:59:48+00:00): Bonjour,

SVP bien vouloir tagger la tension des lignes électriques.

Dans la grande majorité des cas, les lignes a 3 files c'est du 25000V, et a un fil c'est du 14400V

Vous pouvez aussi regarder la documentation dans le wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Power_networks/Canada/Qu%C3%A9bec
mdgm (2025-11-07 01:07:10+00:00): Salut,

Je n'étais pas totalement sûr des niveaux de tension dans ce réseau, donc j'ai opté pour cartographier seulement la position des lignes.

Je vais voir si je trouve une référence pour confirmer que les lignes triphasées dans ce secteur sont du 25 kV avant de commencer à tagger la tension.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-11-02 02:18:29+00:00): This changeset disconnected the motorway link while moving the intersection to the wrong location.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174044228
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-11-02 02:20:44+00:00): The editor gives warnings for a reason.
SnowyLogCabin (2025-11-02 06:05:51+00:00): Motorway was simply moved to reflect what is shown on the road for proper lane for turning right.
SnowyLogCabin (2025-11-02 06:06:49+00:00): Additionally, no warnings were shown on the editor when submitting. If was present, would have corrected them at that time.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-11-02 12:03:48+00:00): If the warning that has been attached to this changeset didn't show up in the editor a github issue should be opened.
This one: 
"warnings:impossible_oneway:highway	2"
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-11-02 12:08:47+00:00): Should look something like this:
https://imgur.com/a/JmZInGL
felipeeugenio (2025-11-01 11:40:16+00:00): Hola. Bienvenido a la comunidad OSM. gracias por sus ediciones.

Le pedimos por favor ir un poco más lento. Agregó una buena cantidad de objetos, lo que se agradece, pero, como es normal en quienes empiezan, hay varios errores.
Por lo pronto le pedimos, en lo que a usos de suelo se refiere, hacer segmentos más pequeños. Los grassland pasaban por encima de varias casas.
Saludos y cualquier duda por favor no dude en escribirnos en el chat de Telegram  en el link en mi perfil.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174044827
JJIglesias (2025-11-01 04:23:03+00:00): Saludos, por que el Ref=48 y el Local_ref=F48?

Que yo sepa es 1 solo numero con una sola presentacion, No tenemos 2 numeros distintos, que yo sepa.

Osea habría q cambiar todas las RVF para cumplir ese patron q has puesto
5m4u9 (2025-11-01 05:55:04+00:00): Hola, buena pregunta. No no, todas ya tienen este formato "solo" en las relaciones.

Este caso (de "doble" ref) solo se da en las relaciones, ref=F1-F46 + F48-F49 sigue vigente como única en las secciones de las carreteras dibujadas. En esta ruta me falta corregir :(.

De todas formas, nadie usa este tag de relaciones, básicamente es como un catálogo agrupador, todos los mapas usan el ref de las secciones de las carreteras.
JJIglesias (2025-11-01 15:11:52+00:00): Ok, si te entiendo eso va en las Relaciones, pero los segmentos de vias quedaran como ref=Fxx?

Si es asi no hay problema, aunque sigo sin entender cual es la necesidad de doble etiqueta de Ref y  Local_ref, cuando legalmente es 1 solo numero y no 2
HSL_HRT (2025-12-16 13:37:46+00:00): Hei! Tiedoksi että siirsin nämä rappukirjaimet addr:housenumber tagin takaa addr:unit tagin taakse, minne ne paremmin sopivat. Nämä addr:housenumber -arvot nousivat esiin saatesanoilla "addr:housenumber without number" tässä validaattorissa https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fi/map/#zoom=10&lat=60.1794&lon=25.006&item=9000&level=1%2C2%2C3&loc=13/60.21779/24.85643
cowboyxup (2025-11-01 07:30:05+00:00): Hallo hlfan,
die Kreuzung war perfekt nach ihrer Geometrie mit der Kurve gemapped, der Wegeführung, als auch der priorisierten Ampelschaltung folgte.
Meiner Meinung macht deine Änderung die Routenführung nicht besser.
cowboyxup (2025-11-01 07:45:43+00:00): Auf jeden Fall ist Routing nicht möglich: 
Access no auf: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1320344402
hlfan (2025-11-02 03:34:18+00:00): Das Eintragen von Fahrspuren derselben Fahrbahn als getrennte Fahrbahnen würde ich von der Topologie her gesehen nicht als perfekt beschreiben. Straßenmarkierungen sind ja für die Topologie der highway-Linien irrelevant.

Das kannst du gerne bei deinem Revert berücksichtigen, ich bin auf dieses overmapping ja nur wegen dem klar falschen highway=busway gestoßen.
cowboyxup (2025-11-02 13:18:40+00:00): Was meinst du mit klar falschen highway=busway?
cowboyxup (2025-11-03 09:00:39+00:00): Hallo hlfan, Ist jetzt Teilweise in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/17413689 revertiert um das defekte routing zu fixen.

Happy Mapping
cowboyxup
cowboyxup (2025-11-03 09:01:31+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174136896
Frans S (2025-11-07 11:59:54+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping. 
About identifying hedges, look for continuing lines, separating an area and highways. Here just alongside the road are hedges visible
Best regards and keep mapping
Higashimado (2025-11-01 04:21:33+00:00): 参考 OSM Wiki 中对中国地名译法的意见，place 标签上的英文译名中不需要包含通名

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multilingual_names#China
Alliegaytor (2025-11-03 11:29:04+00:00): What is this untagged way meant to be https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1446647689 and is this bus route (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16087037) meant to route over it?
balint36 (2026-06-05 21:02:52+00:00): Klotildliget peronja miért kapott Magyar Honvédség azonosítót?
habi (2025-11-06 09:17:17+00:00): Ciao Pan
I'm also here because of the tool from confusedbuffalo.
When correcting the phone number I'd also take care of deduplicating them from `contact:phone` and `phone` to only one of the keys.
I've done that in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174277232
Greetings,
habi

PS: I often use `phone` as it seems that this is the default of ID, but both are valid, in my opinion just not as duplicates...
Pan (2025-11-06 09:25:31+00:00): Always nice to read you and thanks fir the tool. I am also using phone in general.
habi (2025-11-06 12:09:26+00:00): Not my tool, I just helped to make it run for Switzerland ;)
Happy mapping!
fortera_au (2025-11-02 10:08:48+00:00): Hey, a lot of these do look like they're semi-detatched houses, common in these kind of residential living areas. If you want to add a bit of extra detail, you can usually use a fence in the backyard to identify where the split between the two is, and map the two houses separately (with the one wall joining them together) if you want to. Don't feel obliged to, but it's a handy way to add a bit of extra detail!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174046445
Kovoschiz (2025-11-01 09:36:32+00:00): 1. . Please don't add `leisure=park` to different phases. This causes duplicates. They are not parks on their own. There's only 1 "Park" here. It's already covered. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12921008
2. `smoking=no` should not be added, as it's the legal and de facto default. Only exceptions should be added.
Kovoschiz (2025-11-01 09:57:30+00:00): Please don't use `service=emergency_access` for EVA, as it actually means roads only used for emergencies, eg outside fire stations, hospitals, and police stations. `emergency=designated` should be added.
Kovoschiz (2025-11-01 10:01:20+00:00): Please don't add `bridge=yes` to the walled section, as they are usually mechanically-stabilized embankments( ie `embankment=yes` ). Only use it above the joints, and empty void below.
TrickyFoxy (2025-11-01 11:20:51+00:00): 👋  Пожалуйста, не редактируйте здания. Заправка это вот эта линия https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/362919258
Kovoschiz (2025-11-01 09:37:52+00:00): This is invalid. A `=multipolygon` should not include `=multipolygon` , only `way` for the outlines. Please avoid touching these as it's complicated if you aren't familiar.
Ruslan Fatih (2025-11-01 14:02:00+00:00): Привет! 👋
Обратил внимание, что вы убираете слово «улица» из названий

В OpenStreetMap это считается ошибкой: в теге name=* должно быть указано полное официальное название, как оно написано на табличках и в официальных документах.
Правило описано здесь:
📘 osm.wiki/RU:Good_practice#Название_улиц
«Не сокращайте названия. Тег name должен содержать полное официальное название объекта, включая слова „улица“, „проспект“ и т. п.»
Предлагаю вернуть полные формы, например:

name=проспект Абая
Спасибо за вашу работу над картой!
Алексей Чернов 2693 (2025-11-05 15:37:59+00:00): Доброго времени суток!
Данная информация и правки вносились на основе локальных данных нашей компании. В имеющейся информации слова "улица", "проспект" и т.д. вынесены в отдельное поле и не являются основными (кроме того не везде присутствуют). В связи с этим было решено не использовать их, т.к. на руках нет всех геопривязанных табличек с официальными названиями. Если планируете изменять - то необходимо делать эту процедуру на весь город, т.к. я его обновил и пронумеровал по единому стандарту. Моя работа по этому городу на данный момент закончена.
Ruslan Fatih (2025-11-01 14:01:58+00:00): Привет! 👋
Обратил внимание, что вы убираете слово «улица» из названий

В OpenStreetMap это считается ошибкой: в теге name=* должно быть указано полное официальное название, как оно написано на табличках и в официальных документах.
Правило описано здесь:
📘 osm.wiki/RU:Good_practice#Название_улиц
«Не сокращайте названия. Тег name должен содержать полное официальное название объекта, включая слова „улица“, „проспект“ и т. п.»
Предлагаю вернуть полные формы, например:

name=проспект Абая
Спасибо за вашу работу над картой!
NeisRevert (2025-11-01 07:23:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/174048356
where the changeset comment is: 
Remove vandalism
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-01 12:03:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 174058693 where the changeset comment is: Reverting more block-evading edits in Spain - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18897 https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18898
NeisRevert (2025-11-01 07:23:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/174048349
where the changeset comment is: 
Remove vandalism
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-01 12:03:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 174058693 where the changeset comment is: Reverting more block-evading edits in Spain - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18897 https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18898
NeisRevert (2025-11-01 07:23:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/174048343
where the changeset comment is: 
Remove vandalism
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-01 12:03:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 174058693 where the changeset comment is: Reverting more block-evading edits in Spain - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18897 https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18898