piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
silversurfer83 (2025-12-26 13:02:47+00:00): Moin :)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1461664958 liegen hier überhaupt noch Gleise? Wenn nicht sollte es in meinen Augen "razed" statt "abandoned" sein und ohne Gleise keine gauge. Bei usage dann auch ein lifecycle prefix bitte.

Außerdem hast du an diesen neu erfassten Abschnitt und das daran nach Westen anschließende Stück komplett layer=1 gepackt. Warum? gelayert werden sollte nur da, wo wirklich nötig.

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176411501
donovaly (2025-12-26 22:58:05+00:00): I don't know about the state of the abandoned railway. I just noticed that there is no relation yet for this former railway line, so I created on. I also connected it with Wikidata. Feel free to add or remove tags to the relation. I did not change things for the tracks.
I don't know why the layer went wrong. I removed it now.
silversurfer83 (2025-12-28 09:55:32+00:00): Thanks for the reply.

This part https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1461664958 is shown as "new" in OsmCha that's why I asked.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176411501
Lola Fox (2026-03-10 19:55:05+00:00): Ciao. Visto che Voltana è un paese di fatto urbanisticamente separato dalle campagne adiacenti, non sarebbe stato meglio lasciarlo mappato come Paese e non comeArea residenziale, più propriamente adatta a rioni o hinterland cittadini?
GBAB (2026-03-13 16:08:11+00:00): Direi che definitivamente no.

I tag place= si usano soprattutto per comunicare il nome (e forse altri dati) del paese/citta'/qualcos'altro
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:place
I tag place sono usati per lo piu' su punti (node) e meno su aree.

Se si tratta di un'area, ci vuole sempre un tag 'fisico' che, nel caso di un'area abitata, puo' essere o landuse=residential o landuse=farmland
Lola Fox (2026-03-14 14:58:16+00:00): ok, ma allora cosa servono "piccolo borgo / paese / cittadina" ecc... per le aree? Cioè quando è che si usano?
GBAB (2026-03-17 15:01:15+00:00): Per lo piu' si fa che

• si prende l'area e ci mette landuse=residential (o, se si tratta solo di 1 o 2 case, allora landuse=farmyard). Ci sono anche subtag di residential=* che si puo' usare per precisare la tipologia dell'area abitata.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:residential

poi

• si mette un puntino (node) nel centro dell'area abitata (p.es. sulla piazza centrale o di fronte alla chiesa o al comune) e su questo node si mettono i tag place=* e name=* e quello che si vuole ancora, p.es. wikidata=*, wikipedia=*, postal_code=, population=* eccetera.
redd (2026-01-25 07:31:31+00:00): Hallo Honeybal,
du hast hier scheinbar leider ausversehen nochmal das ganze Gebäude gelöscht.

Bitte etwas vorsichtig sein beim editieren.

Grüße,

Redd
redd (2026-01-25 07:55:09+00:00): Wiederhergestellt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/34680695
redd (2026-01-25 22:38:08+00:00): Bitte immer einen Änderungskommentar angeben!
eggie (2025-12-26 08:36:09+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
DeKoerier (2025-12-26 19:04:53+00:00): Ontvangen en gelezen!
NeisBot (2025-12-27 15:36:49+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 11 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/26323541 v35 | 5 crossings
https://osm.org/way/26323562 v30 | 3 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1264350274 v2 | 3 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/285945457 v17

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=176412533
NeisReview (2026-01-04 07:20:38+00:00): ✅ Should by fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/176537965
mjog (2025-12-25 23:20:36+00:00): Thanks Luke!
pokld (2026-01-08 21:23:29+00:00): The trail was already quite conventional, but it was also passable. What happened there that it's impossible to get through there now?
GA_Kevin (2026-01-07 17:17:19+00:00): Hey Gamer2000! Thanks so much for adding these street lamps. Fantastic work in Brevard County :)
GA_Kevin (2026-01-07 17:20:04+00:00): Also, you may be interested in a visualizer of your work, see here: https://sb12.github.io/OSMStreetLight/#8/28.019/-80.186
Gamer2000 (2026-01-30 04:02:36+00:00): Hey, you're very welcome, I figured it would be a necessary touch to add the street lamps, also ty for the link :D
NeisBot (2025-12-26 00:46:22+00:00): Hi YukinoLR, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 99% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
No primary map features.

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=176414132
YukinoLR (2025-12-26 00:51:45+00:00): Hi, thanks for the alert. Yes, this 99% deletion is entirely intentional.
I have performed a major cleanup of a 'geometry mess' that contained thousands of redundant and overlapping nodes. I replaced the bloated structures with simplified, clean polygons to improve map data quality and rendering performance. No actual geographical features were removed; only the underlying data structure was optimized.
pitscheplatsch (2025-12-27 13:02:04+00:00): Thank you for your reply. 
Looks good.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-03 19:31:39+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6003819926/history has shop = glass that was added in this edit
shop=glass ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop or https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Tag_descriptions_for_key_%22shop%22 fitting? Maybe new value needs to be invented? Maybe this data is wrong and there is no shop here? Maybe it is not a shop but something else?
RoseBTCmap (2026-02-04 01:25:37+00:00): Hello! Please, check you DM.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-04 02:38:01+00:00): seen it! BTW, it would be perfectly fine to post it here in comments
donmac703 (2026-01-19 22:18:34+00:00): Hi Matt,
You accidentally dragged a bus stop into the middle of Erina High School.
johannes4321 (2026-01-12 19:23:24+00:00): In dem Changeset hast du bei verschiedenen Stationen ne Menge Tags entfernt, z.B. bei Riederau https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13796820/history wikidata link, wheelchair tag, uic ref und ein paar mehr. War das Absicht oder ein Versehen?

Ähnlich auch bei Raisting  https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11298551/history
Patrick1977Bln (2026-01-13 20:38:06+00:00): Die gelöschten Merkmale des Punktes 11298551 habe ich in den neuen Punkt 13406887825 übertragen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13406887825/history#map=21/47.9116801/11.1144744&layers=T

Die Tags stop_position und station bzw. halt werden fälschlicherweise gerne zusammengefasst, es sollten jedoch immer verschiedene Punkte sein. Sollte ich in dem betroffenen Gebiet einen Bahnhof/Haltepunkt übersehen haben, bei denen ich keinen neuen Punkt angelegt habe, bitte kurze Info, ich korrigiere das dann. Danke für deinen Hinweis.
BarryMyles (2025-12-26 01:57:23+00:00): Thanks for the edit. Any reason all the roads are marked as highway=service, service=driveway, driveway=pipestem? I'm thinking that many of these new roads would be better as highway=residential instead.
Mintusha98 (2025-12-26 02:07:45+00:00): Thank you for the valuable feedback. Please feel free to share similar suggestions in the future as well. Regards, Mintusha V S.
TrickyFoxy (2026-01-13 00:14:56+00:00): 👋 В правом меню редактора есть кнопка «Настройки фонового изображения». Выберите там спутниковые снимки ESRI — они свежее
BCNorwich (2025-12-27 06:21:29+00:00): Squared up.
Dhriti890 (2025-12-27 09:51:28+00:00): Change verified and found correct.
BCNorwich (2025-12-27 06:27:29+00:00): That's a small part of the park, the park area overall is mapped, Way: 117423298
FajrAl (2025-12-26 02:16:52+00:00): Tidak boleh memasukkan informasi probadi
BCNorwich (2025-12-27 06:30:04+00:00): squared up
galen8183 (2026-04-25 00:18:51+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1461690291 is wildly innaccurate, this should have been caught by manually reviewing each imported outline.
BCNorwich (2025-12-27 06:35:16+00:00): education=school is a proposed tag so as yet is just a description, not rendered.
BCNorwich (2025-12-27 07:34:29+00:00): Tweaked areas
BCNorwich (2025-12-27 07:34:48+00:00): Tweaked.
NeisBot (2025-12-26 02:19:21+00:00): Hi 吴盐胜雪, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 93% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 4 addr(s)
- 8 amenity(s)
- 1 barrier(s)
- 42 building(s)
- 45 highway(s)
- 3 landuse(s)
- 8 leisure(s)
- 37 name(s)
- 1 sport(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=176415400
pitscheplatsch (2025-12-27 13:03:47+00:00): Looks legit.
CharliePlett (2025-12-26 06:30:50+00:00): Hey, I love that you add new roads. Maybe you could add your source when mapping roads that don't exist on the Bing and Esri imagery so someone else doesn't delete them accidentally. I did check Copernicus satellite and confirmed that this is true, but others wouldn't check. 

Also I try to tag the surfaces of all roads in Belize.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176415424
NeisBot (2025-12-26 02:22:22+00:00): Hi YukinoLR, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 99% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
No primary map features.

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=176415438
YukinoLR (2025-12-26 02:27:33+00:00): Hi, thanks for the alert. Yes, this 99% deletion is entirely intentional.
I have performed a major cleanup of a 'geometry mess' that contained thousands of redundant and overlapping nodes. I replaced the bloated structures with simplified, clean polygons to improve map data quality and rendering performance. No actual geographical features were removed; only the underlying data structure was optimized.
pitscheplatsch (2025-12-27 13:01:47+00:00): Thank you for your reply. 
Looks good.
angys (2025-12-26 04:14:50+00:00): Hi, we don't use living_street attributes in Malaysia, if residential area should stick with highway=residential, thank you.
ajxm (2025-12-27 06:09:19+00:00): Thank you. Can a tertiary road have speed bumps? This road has no direct acces to houses, is 4 lanes and has heavy traffic.
angys (2025-12-27 15:48:10+00:00): Or highway=unclassified if applied
KennyDap (2025-12-26 02:48:35+00:00): Fix Vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176415777
Fizzie-DWG (2025-12-26 02:58:57+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19218
muralito (2025-12-29 13:13:45+00:00): Hola.

En addr:postcode va el CPA (el nuevo de 8 caracteres). En este caso seria E3200AMI, que es el que indica hasta la manzana.

El codigo postal viejo 3200 se tendria que usar solo para etiquetar un area grande, con la etiqueta "postal_code"
Bastian Greshake Tzovaras (2025-12-29 18:31:07+00:00): Gracias! Acabo de leer mas sobre esto aca: https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/C%C3%B3digo_Postal_Argentino <3
Sylabowy Kot (2025-12-26 09:33:53+00:00): Don't you've been already asked to not input all of these unnecessary information about your job? And, if that road is already opened, what about the construction site? Isn't it abandoned or finished? It would be good if your team did/said something about and areas surrounded by a mapped roads.
Kovoschiz (2025-12-26 10:03:29+00:00): This section is embanked, not bridged continuously. You can see the joint easily on the span across Lin Cheung Rd on the east.
vectorial8192 (2025-12-26 11:21:56+00:00): Then, at least previous changes should somehow indicate "embankment=yes", the tag which did not exist.

From aerial images this looks like a bridge to me.
i2004 (2025-12-26 13:54:45+00:00): me ayudas despues con el 60 a ver si me quedo algo desordenado
Hung Tran 9x0 (2025-12-30 14:47:37+00:00): có một đoạn 'parking_aisle' trong trường Vinschool bạn đặt layer=-1 không đúng lắm, vì đường nằm trên mặt đất chứ đâu có nằm dưới mặt đất. Nếu nó đi xuyên qua tòa nhà, bạn nên chia nhỏ đường ra, đoạn đi qua tòa nhà thì để riêng layer=-1 để không hiện lỗi, còn phần còn lại không cần đặt layer. Hoặc nếu bạn biết rõ cấu trúc tòa nhà, bạn có thể vẽ các building part, phần có đường đi qua thì đặt layer=1 thể hiện là nó nằm trên đường (layer=0).
JoeG (2025-12-30 23:45:31+00:00): Hi! This changeset deletes a number of fences. I intend to revert this deletion. Let me know if there's any reason they should be kept deleted.
Iam A (2025-12-26 11:35:45+00:00): پیتزا های بشدت خوشمزه و داغ
chath_tsu (2025-12-26 04:46:40+00:00): i checked alternative aerial sources and it does appear that the intersection config was changed temporarily for some time in 2024-25 for 148th to be oneway southbound here, but it has since been changed back
HashFerret (2025-12-26 05:06:47+00:00): Relations were copied over to multipolygon. Hoping I got everything right. The dimensions for the inside of the relation represent the paths down the stairs and the ramp. The rough size is based off photos I took while surveying. Further work to improve underground detail is needed.
HashFerret (2025-12-26 05:07:51+00:00): I'm assuming the bounding box is just because of the frontrunner relations... please don't hesitate to revert if necessary.
JoeG (2025-12-30 23:42:39+00:00): Hi again. This changeset has footway=sidewalk deleted on 2 ways. It also deletes several fences and a driveway. As for the other changesets, is there a reason for this?
DeanBA (2025-12-31 12:53:28+00:00): No sidewalks have been deleted. All footpaths are in place wherever they exist
TheSwavu (2025-12-31 23:03:28+00:00): I think the question was more about why the footway tagging was removed eg https://osm.mapki.com/history/way/1313669568
sabas88 (2025-12-26 11:08:05+00:00): Davvero? Hai un link?
La chiamavo così per il meme solamente hahaha
EneaSuper (2025-12-26 16:04:21+00:00): Anche a me risulta che l'opera si chiamasse "Tonni Suicidi", ma in questo caso le denominazioni le metterei sulla rotonda stessa e non sull'opera, non so se mi spiego...
camminatoreseriale (2025-12-27 08:31:54+00:00): @sabas88, sì, sul sito ufficiale comunale dell’Aster (cantieri.aster.genova.it), documento relativo al cantiere stradale della via accanto (indicato come “attivo dalla via XY alla Rotonda dei tonni suicidi”). Sono scoppiato a ridere pure io, trattandosi di documenti dirigenziali che ovviamente sono firmati da chi di dovere (ingegneri e responsabili amministrativi/politici). Ne sono assolutamente certo ma si può ridare un’occhiata nell’archivio, alla bisogna, se ci sono i cantieri conclusi.

@EneaSuper, sì, pare anche a me una buona idea la tua, ma non vorrei interrompesse la continuità delle altre due vie, che dici?..
EneaSuper (2025-12-27 10:30:37+00:00): Capisco cosa intendi @camminatoreseriale, ma non penso sia un problema giacché dette denominazioni si possono mettere (una o tutte) sotto altri tag appositi, e non in quello name=.

Vedasi, ad esempio, cosa ho fatto nella Rotonda della Locomotiva a Bolzaneto 🙂
camminatoreseriale (2025-12-27 16:19:50+00:00): M’hai convinterrimo. Fatto! 👍🏻
camminatoreseriale (2025-12-27 16:20:41+00:00): Modificate e sistemate pure, se c’è da fare altro 👍🏻
NeisBot (2025-12-28 07:43:38+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13408002371 v1

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Tree services in Greater Atlanta area"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description
NeisBot (2026-01-02 08:44:14+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/176732550
(Deleted leftovers after several edits)
Frans S (2026-01-27 14:11:29+00:00): Thanks for mapping on this project.
When you map a rectangular building, please square it by pressing the Q key while selected.
Best regards
Frans S (2026-01-27 14:51:00+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
Please square each rectangular building with the Q key while selected.
Best regards
rarad74 (2025-12-26 10:36:32+00:00): Imaginile Bing sunt mai vechi de 8 ani de zile. Foloseste imaginile Mapbox sau ESRI standard.
openstreetmapbuddy (2025-12-26 12:32:09+00:00): Bing este sursa de imagini a singurului editor OSM larg de pe iPhone. Oricum eu cunosc zonele în care editez.
liums (2025-12-28 09:12:13+00:00): batch 9*
Hufkratzer (2025-12-26 23:02:12+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1461780422 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1461780423 are no horse riding centers, they may be horse riding arenas like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1133046791. See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a#Riding_centre_(equestrian)
BholeKiBhasam (2025-12-27 12:19:47+00:00): g'day, much obliged....i was not getting the name of it...appreciate you for guiding me to correct it....have great weekend and moment to come by ahead
Hufkratzer (2025-12-27 13:47:31+00:00): Thank you as well.
BholeKiBhasam (2026-04-11 15:02:31+00:00): g'day,...thanks for catching up again....that tag was just riding off my mind, but got it and now rounding it up for new mapping....
kabelhaai (2026-02-05 20:10:29+00:00): Hartelijk dank om deze in te geven. Ik wil je tevens toch deze info meegeven:
Trajectcontroles bestaan niet uit een flitscamera maar een ANPR camera. Soms hangt er een CCTV-security camera bij onder maar niet altijd (zoals in dit geval).
Het is geen speed_camera maar een average-trajectory zone, dit is niet simpel in te geven dus je zou in de toekomst een note (report) kunnen openen, indien gewenst. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:enforcement#Example_9:_Highway_average_speed_radar

mvg
TrickyFoxy (2025-12-26 17:39:25+00:00): 👋 Спасибо за уточнения.

В правом меню редактора есть кнопка «Настройки фонового изображения». Выберите там спутниковые снимки ESRI — они свежее.

После того как нарисовали здание не забывайте нажимать Q, чтобы выпрямить его
CatchingTheStars (2025-12-26 08:14:34+00:00): OSMCha lists this as a possible import. None of this data is an import, this took me like 12+ hours and a manual survey and my own pictures.
eggie (2025-12-26 08:47:41+00:00): Feedback Beter geen adresnode veranderen. Dan ontbreken straks adressen. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-12-26 08:49:01+00:00): Dag bayjay   Bedrijven graag toevoegen aan de adresnode. Dus niet aan de gebouwomtrek.
Ik pas even wat aan.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-12-26 08:55:07+00:00): Formats aangepast openingstijden en website.
Taal is UK English in OSM. Dit was niet de website.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=176424682
MVG
eggie
Waldo Lemmer (2025-12-27 14:40:09+00:00): Thanks, apparently I couldn't read when I did these 😅
eggie (2025-12-26 08:42:08+00:00): Dag bayjay57  Meestal zijn tweewielers uitgezonderd van eenrichting. Is dat hier het geval. Dan toevoegen oneway:bicycle=no en evt ook voor moped en mofa,

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-12-26 09:04:00+00:00): Aangepast mbt uitzonderingen tweewielers
NeisBot (2025-12-27 15:37:22+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 21 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/23464116 v21 | 6 crossings
https://osm.org/way/35375533 v11 | 6 crossings
https://osm.org/way/227580680 v3 | 5 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/210764915 v8

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=176426163
NeisReview (2026-01-04 07:20:39+00:00): ✅ Should by fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/176567260
user_5359 (2025-12-26 09:06:55+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database.
Please only draw in existing objects and facts. I have now reverted your changes.
grzegorz75jan (2025-12-26 15:01:17+00:00): The name tag is unnecessary and incorrect here (a so-called descriptive name). The general tags (shop=covenience) for the store already identify it as a grocery store.

Thank you for adding the parcel locker, although it contains incomplete tags https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity=parcel%20locker?uselang=pl , but there's a chance someone will add the missing tags.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176426331
nevw (2025-12-26 12:02:44+00:00): Hi, you have placed your business on a city building that is quite a distance from the address tags.
nevw (2025-12-27 04:12:36+00:00): I have reverted this changeset as I am unable to verify the physical address.
Arturio9912 (2025-12-26 09:28:52+00:00): +
nevw (2025-12-26 12:04:46+00:00): Hi, you have placed your business node at a position that is not near the tagged address.
nevw (2025-12-27 04:12:13+00:00): I have reverted this changeset as I am unable to verify the physical address.
nevw (2025-12-26 12:10:13+00:00): Hi. You have located this business in a position that is not in the vicinity of the listed address on the web.
nevw (2025-12-27 04:11:52+00:00): I have reverted this changeset as I am unable to verify the physical address.
Filip009 (2026-07-10 06:13:28+00:00): Prečo, to fixme? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13408383728 main a main:function=block je podľa mňa okej
Sylabowy Kot (2025-12-26 19:23:18+00:00): Are these translations official?
Jobigutenburg (2025-12-26 19:55:56+00:00): Yes
SomeoneElse (2026-01-10 12:35:16+00:00): Hello,
Would it be possible to provide a bit more detail about why you made this edit (and all your other ones)?  "Fixed highway issue" doesn't say anything, "#maproulette" just says that you didn't actually survey it and "#tomtom" is just who you work for.
World_Winner (2026-01-10 14:14:41+00:00): Hi SomeoneElse,
Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you.
World_Winner (2026-01-13 17:32:26+00:00): Hi SomeoneElse, thank you for your valuable feedback. Writing good and effective changeset comments is a topic we are currently addressing within the team, and your message clearly demonstrates to me the value of this practice. I will use this as a learning and improvement opportunity to be a better editor. 
For my edit, the task was originated from OSMOSE checks, and was part of the United States – Improving Road Data Quality (Los Angeles) project on MapRoulette. The footway and service road were not properly connected to each other and I connected the ways and added the appropriate highway=crossing tag to the shared node. 
Thank you for your understanding and your kindness to reach out and ask.