piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2025-12-08 16:46:12+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your changesets and noticed that the cumulative count of your recent edits (2 changesets) shows that 447 of your last 518 changes were deletions. This is quite an unusual proportion, so I wanted to check with you.

Could you please confirm whether these deletions were intentional or if they may have occurred by mistake?

#DeletionsCheck #Cumulative
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?uid=23421615
benguuuuu (2025-12-08 16:55:54+00:00): Thank you these were intentional I was removing the old golf course relations and creating one large boundary for the entire course.
HeyRayReh (2026-01-15 22:11:57+00:00): This road was outside any locked gates when I was there, with no "no trespassing" signs that I saw.  It's clearly a borderline case, but I believe this fire road is ok for the public up to the gates (unless something has changed in the last few months) and is part of the network of fire roads accessible from Figueroa Street and Glen Oaks Road
spiregrain (2025-12-08 16:38:47+00:00): thank-you, LateNightTone!
LateNightTone (2025-12-08 16:52:43+00:00): My pleasure!
Dimitar155 (2026-01-31 13:16:57+00:00): Точките на way/413900619 с номер "А" и "Б" към улицата ли се отнасят, т.е. №21А и №21Б, или това са буквите на входовете (№21 вх. А и вх. Б)?
ion_chi (2025-12-09 18:23:23+00:00): Hey Nick,
The wiki states busway is not for bus bays or short bus-only service roads. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dbusway#What_is_not_a_busway.  By the wiki's definition, I don't think there are any highway=busways in Chicago. There's also the whole issue of highway=busway not being rendered in Carto
nickvet419 (2025-12-09 18:51:59+00:00): Remarked the service road leading to the power station.  Past that in a busway and does meet the definition. highway=busway is used on most all of the bus lines terminal areas in Chicago where Bus only signage is present.
ion_chi (2025-12-10 14:46:10+00:00): Cheers, thank you
nickvet419 (2025-12-10 18:53:24+00:00): I would not oppose marking the rest with service and busbay tags but it should be uniform accross the chicago area how the bus only terminals are taged.
ion_chi (2025-12-10 20:17:55+00:00): Agreed on being consistent
ilias_ (2025-12-08 20:06:59+00:00): Carrefour Market opens at 8:30, not 8:29. La Cité already existes on the map, so you created a duplicate. I fixed both points.

Thank you and welcome to OSM.
Z1ZOU (2025-12-28 15:05:52+00:00): Thank you, sorry for my lateness.
There's Two La Cité schools actually I think I may not have seen the second one on the map so sorry.
John Kastner (2025-12-09 01:43:40+00:00): > fixme	Where is this?

The location is way off, but it's probably meant to be the liberty bell replica outside of union station.
willkmis (2025-12-09 02:46:57+00:00): I wasn't sure if it was meant to be this: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8254222443, which is a lot closer, but also in a location that might be hard to survey...
FajrAl (2025-12-09 01:41:12+00:00): Cara membuat batas di OpenStreetMap bukan begitu. Caranya:
1. Gunakan tombol U untuk menyembunyikan layer yang lain.
2. Polygon yang dibuat tidak boleh tersambung dengan apa pun selain batas lainnya. Contoh: sungai, jalan, penggunaan lahan. Harus membuat garis sendiri, tidak boleh menumpang dengan geometri lain.
3. Setelah buat polygon-nya, pilih tambahkan Relasi di kiri bawah panel, kemudian pilih "Batas" atau bisa cari "Batas." 
4. tag yang dibutuhkan:
type=boundary
boundary=administrative
admin_level= 9 (untuk RW) atau 10 (untuk RT)
5. Penyuntingan batas administrasi di OpenStreetMap bukanlah hal yang mudah, lebih baik minta tolong kepada pemeta lain di Tele komunitas https://t.me/osmindonesia atau bisa tetap kamu simpan saja di aplikasi GIS mu.
eggie (2025-12-08 19:33:32+00:00): Oke, maar dit pand heeft wel een adres. Ik zal het herstellen.

MVG
eggie
JustEpic38 (2025-12-08 17:24:12+00:00): ostéopathe médicentre 2
Andrea Musuruane (2025-12-09 11:21:48+00:00): Ciao. Il nome e' il nome proprio della feature, non un nome comune come colonnina di ricarica, parcheggio, giardino, ecc. Se non ha un nome, non si inserisce niente. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175677365
perusluku (2025-12-09 12:32:45+00:00): Hei, taisit tässä samalla vahingossa pistää Finkensillan ratikkaraiteet leijumaan vetten päälle. Onnistuuko fiksaus?
kartoittaa (2025-12-09 12:57:45+00:00): Moikka, kiitos huomiosta ja pahoittelut mokasta! Mikä lie vahinkoklikkaus käynyt. 

Nyt pitäisi olla fiksattu: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175712343
hieuvan (2025-12-13 09:51:40+00:00): A lot of the edited highways have not been opened for traffic and are still under construction. Please keep highway=construction tags.
ZioDragon (2025-12-13 10:13:54+00:00): The road is now officially completed, although satellite imagery hasn't been updated yet, but currently no vehicles are allowed to use it.
Szymson (2025-12-08 17:18:33+00:00): I co? Zaś będą szlaki prowadziły przez przejścia dla zwierząt?
englu (2025-12-08 18:49:11+00:00): A skąd pochodzi informacja, że jest to tylko i wyłącznie przejście dla zwierząt? Z jakiejś dokumentacji projektowej dotyczącej budowy obwodnicy? W terenie nie ma zakazów ani żadnych informacji na ten temat.
Szymson (2025-12-08 20:17:48+00:00): Wytyczanie szlaków w takich miejscach jest bez sensu chociażby z uwagi na ASF. Przegrodzeń mających zablokować zakażone dziki niszczyć nie wolno, a bez tego przejść się przez nie pieszemu nie uda.
Szymson (2025-12-08 20:19:02+00:00): Powinny powstać jakieś alternatywne warianty szlaków, wykorzystujące w rejonie dróg bezkolizyjnych infrastrukturę dedykowaną pieszym, tak by w razie takiej sytuacji turysta nie utknął przed takim przejściem dla zwierząt.
englu (2025-12-09 10:26:26+00:00): W którym miejscu są tam ogrodzenia? Nie widzę ich na OSM.
Szymson (2025-12-09 16:14:32+00:00): Może po prostu zapostuj gdzieś na forum OSM/Discord/serwisie hostingowym informację z PTTK, że te szlaki tamtędy prowadzą? Bo póki co usilnie dodajesz szlaki piesze na przejściach dla zwierząt wg własnego widzimisię.
Szymson (2025-12-09 16:42:04+00:00): Poza tym to jest jeszcze plac budowy, te obiekty nie mają jeszcze odbiorów technicznych. Jakby ktoś sobie idąc takim "szlakiem" pod takim obiektem np. skręcił kostkę to kto byłby za to odpowiedzialny?
englu (2025-12-09 17:06:08+00:00): Po prostu przekonują mnie argumenty PTTK, że mają zgodę na taki przebieg, a samo przejście na zdjęciu wygląda jak szeroki przejazd samochodowy. Niestety nie odpowiedziałeś na moje pytanie o źródło informacji, mówiącej o tym że jest tam zakaz ruchu pieszego, więc nadal nie wiem z czego wynika to twierdzenie. Jeśli jednak uważasz, że ścieżka tam stanowi problem, to usuń ją, nie będę już tego więcej poprawiał i niech szlak będzie przerwany. Zobaczymy za jakiś czas jak się sytuacja rozwinie.
Szymson (2025-12-09 17:47:47+00:00): A byłeś w terenie? Czy są tam oznaczenia szlaków zgodne z instrukcją PTTK?
https://pttk.pl/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Instrukcja-znakowania-szlakow.pdf
englu (2025-12-10 18:40:55+00:00): Nie byłem, nie wiem czy PTTK już naniosło oznaczenia, ale mogę zapytać.
Yog Sot (2025-12-30 19:08:56+00:00): dzicy rowerzyści w naturalnym środowisku
eggie (2025-12-08 19:26:40+00:00): Hoi.. Hier liggen paden op elkaar. Dat lijkt me niet de bedoeling. Met access= no? En een dwars hek ?  Een hek tah je op een mode verbonden met het pad. 
De brug een aqueduct ?

Wat bedoel je daar mee>
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=175677595

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-12-08 19:41:05+00:00): Ik draai dit even terug.

Een footway heeft meestal een G7 bord  Dat is een officieel voetpad. 
Een aqueduct is een waterweg of andere weg die een waterweg kruist
Dat zal hier niet het geval zijn. Het was hier al goed gemapt.
bridge=yes is dus correct.


https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bridge%3Daqueduct

De straatnaam zal niet zijn Wandelbrug over Spruitenstroompje.
Heeft de brug werkelijk die naam.
Ik draai dit even terug. 

MVG
eggie
Aleksandar Lukač (2025-12-08 19:47:22+00:00): Dank voor het nakijken en met het afgegeven feedback.
eggie (2025-12-08 19:52:21+00:00): No problem.. 
Als het goed is zie je het draaihekje nu bij dat infobord.
Er zijn zoveel mpgelijkheden.
Wat is nog steeds doe is elke keer weer de wiki raadplegen. Ik typ dan in google barrier wiki osm
En dan kom je van zelf verder.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:barrier
Aleksandar Lukač (2025-12-08 20:00:25+00:00): Ik heb idd. nu draaihekje geplaatst.
Heb ook al gezocht binnen wiki osm maar heb het niet kunnen vinden..
Nog beter leren zoeken is het devies.
eggie (2025-12-08 20:27:22+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dturnstile
jbcharron (2025-12-08 18:13:43+00:00): Bonjour,
Des échanges ont lieu actuellement sur le forum sur certaines de vos modifications, des réponses de votre part serait apprécié https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/votre-avis-sur-un-contributeur-votre-solution-de-visibilite-digitale-locale/10638/49?u=jean-baptiste
Bonne soirée
bxl-forever (2025-12-08 20:08:58+00:00): Hello,

opening_hours=24/7 (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:opening%20hours=24/7?) is a legitimate tag, and most apps can successfully parse it.
uselang=en


If you mechanically change all those values into "Mo-Su 00:00-24:00", despite it is supposed to mean the same thing, it will still get flagged by several QA apps, which will assume that the value is missing during public holidays or that there *is* a closure every day.  I wouldn’t recommend this kind of edits.
eggie (2025-12-08 19:14:37+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback Het is niet de bedoeling om adresgegevens op de gebouwomtrekken te zetten. Er zij hier al adresnodes al liggen ze op een hoopje.
Ik zal de adressen weer verwijderen.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
bkleipool (2025-12-08 19:21:30+00:00): Dit wist ik niet, dank voor de feedback!
eggie (2025-12-08 19:30:39+00:00): No problem.. veel plezier met mappen.
Groet..
eggie
eggie (2025-12-08 19:48:45+00:00): Je zou evt heel voorzichtig die adresnodes kunnen verplaatsen naar de plek waar ze werkelijk horen.
De adressen zijn import vanuit het Kadaster en die plaatsen die adresnodes vaak willekeurig.
Mapse
eggie (2025-12-08 19:28:21+00:00): Hoi.. Ik denk niet dat dit goed is.
Voor een draaipoortje is wel een aparte tag.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dturnstile

barrier=turnstile.

Kijk je nog even?
Op een node zetten en dat verbinding met het pad.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-12-08 19:36:19+00:00): Als bovenstaand aangepast op een node.
MVG
eggie
matteobott (2025-12-19 15:00:23+00:00): Ciao Nicola, ho già mappato questo defibrillatore (stazione Vetra M4)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13338529120

Del mio, rispetto al tuo, cambia il tipo access=*, magari lo cambiamo

Come sistemiamo?
Seandebasti (2025-12-08 18:28:36+00:00): why do you delete stuff, is it not important to add details?
KikeTM (2025-12-08 18:44:23+00:00): We don’t map indoors.
Seandebasti (2025-12-09 02:41:34+00:00): who is we? osm is a global project and sure there are local specialities but where is this come from? ATM or defibrillator were mapped in Spain, so whats the difference?
There are 3 Megabyte of OSM data having an indoor=yes in Spain. Will you delete that too?
user_5359 (2025-12-09 08:24:44+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on  https://www.osm.org/node/196594563. This is an awkward description. No software reads the description in junction nodes. 

But why are you drawing a road over an existing road and railway line (https://www.osm.org/way/1456960365)?
Katie Evers (2025-12-09 13:07:15+00:00): I'm trying to see what flag you can put on this road to keep semi trucks from Miller Coors from turning left.  A citizen came into the Butler County Engineer's Office yesterday claiming Garmin maps are sending semi trucks into the dead end road of Wayne Madison.  I'm just trying to see what we can change to make that not happen.  I wasn't asking for something new to be created. Just seeing how to resolve this issue they are having.
user_5359 (2025-12-09 14:07:52+00:00): In general, routing lorries with standard routing software for cars is problematic. Weight, length and height are not taken into account here. There is no remedy for this type of user.

Nevertheless, you should try to consistently enter all restrictions on the map.

By the way, by Thomas Road, do you mean the road https://www.osm.org/way/18981395?

When editing, please note that the city limits https://www.osm.org/relation/182570 and the road https://www.osm.org/way/704239774 (and the other ways of the aforementioned road) largely overlap. When making changes, it is easy to select the wrong way.
Katie Evers (2025-12-09 14:59:28+00:00): Thomas Road, do you mean the road way/18981395?.....YES THIS IS THE CORRECT ONE.
Zrop (2025-12-08 21:56:25+00:00): Hallo LinoHammer,
wieso änderst Du hier bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4146205 "sidewalk:left=separate" in "sidewalk=no" ? Hier ist eindeutig ein separater Weg links.

Gruß
Zrop
Dawid2849 (2025-12-08 20:25:15+00:00): Cześć,

niestety musiałem wycofać tę zmianę, gdyż nie jest zgodna z zasadami OSM. Przed następnymi edycjami ważnych dróg w kraju (highway=trunk/primary/secondary) proszę rozpocznij dyskusję na forum (jest to wymagane). Klasy dróg w OSM nie są sztywno powiązane z OSM: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:highway
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Znakowanie_dr%C3%B3g_w_Polsce

Co do tej konkretnej drogi, tutaj odbyła się dyskusja: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/kategorie-drog/57996/208

Pozdrawiam,
Dawid
Dawid2849 (2025-12-09 09:10:45+00:00): Klasy dróg w OSM nie są sztywno powiązane z urzędowymi klasami dróg oczywiście miało być :P
bartgron (2025-12-08 22:18:27+00:00): Nie trzeba w opisie każdego zestawu zmian pisać "jestem mieszkanką":
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
Lucas Santana (2025-12-09 01:28:54+00:00): Se quiser consertar contagem baixa a Malha Viária Metrovia Shapefile tem muita rua errada no sapucaias
Lucas Santana (2025-12-09 01:29:10+00:00): https://geoprocessamento.contagem.mg.gov.br/portal/apps/experiencebuilder/experience/?data_id=dataSource_3-193798ed8da-layer-5%3A69%2CdataSource_3-193798ed8db-layer-6%3A203%2B204%2B205&id=c7b7a53e23d74741b9bd84c4d7d51ada&page=P%C3%A1gina
MassCartog (2025-12-08 18:29:31+00:00): Hi welcome to OSM! Please don't use the name tag to describe the feature. If it has no name just leave it blank, thanks 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions
真中あお (2025-12-09 15:03:27+00:00): 抱歉，变更集说明由于JOSM编辑器的自动补全填错了，请无视“延安大学”四个字。
rempshaener (2025-12-08 19:12:12+00:00): siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175681764
rempshaener (2025-12-08 19:19:05+00:00): siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175682114
civ41 (2025-12-24 16:04:31+00:00): Ciao, mi sono imbattuto per caso su questa strada con nome da verificare se vuoi: way/146830549
dan980 (2025-12-24 17:11:50+00:00): Grazie mille, nell’attivare una scorciatoia da tastiera di Josm, devo aver premuto per errore la combinazione dei tasti per il simbolo del copyright. Lo ho rimosso, grazie per la segnalazione
rempshaener (2025-12-08 19:23:10+00:00): siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175681488
rempshaener (2025-12-08 19:12:20+00:00): siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175681764
rempshaener (2025-12-08 19:23:20+00:00): siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175681488
user_5359 (2025-12-09 08:16:12+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/relation/19935053. You need two ways (role from, to) and one point (exists, but without the role via). The first realtion https://www.osm.org/relation/19935052 is correct.
rempshaener (2025-12-08 19:25:08+00:00): Hallo,
noch ein zusätzlicher Hinweis zu „couplings“:
Wenn diese tatsächlich erfasst werden – z. B. bei Überflurhydranten – dann mit
Anzahl und Größe.
D. h. beispielsweise
couplings=2
couplings:diameters=B;B
Viele Grüße
rempshaener (2025-12-08 19:27:33+00:00): Hallo,
Hydranten sollten nicht mit Straßen, Gebäuden u. ä. verbunden werden. Das lässt sich leicht beheben: im Editor markieren und „E“ drücken – das löst den Hydranten von der Linie.
Viele Grüße
NeisBot (2025-12-08 18:46:07+00:00): Hi Wullen, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 83% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 1 barrier(s)
- 1 waterway(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=175681606
pitscheplatsch (2025-12-08 19:03:15+00:00): This changeset reverts the creator’s own previous edits.
rempshaener (2025-12-08 19:17:16+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.
Du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Ich habe folgende Anmerkungen:
- couplings=B
Das Feld "couplings" bleibt bei Unterflurhydranten leer, da es sich um die „Angabe der vorhandenen Anzahl an Schlauchanschlüssen“ handelt, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:couplings?uselang=de. Unterflurhydranten haben in der Regel nur mit Standrohr eine Schlauchkupplung. 
- note=einsatzbereit
Der Hinweis ist nicht nötig. Grundsätzlich sind in OSM als emergency=fire_hydrant gepflegte Hydranten nutzbar. Erst wenn sie es nicht mehr sind, wird das über https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lebenszyklus-Pr%C3%A4fix abgebildet.
Vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag und weiterhin viel Spaß beim Mappen.
Viele Grüße
eggie (2025-12-08 19:17:14+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback Format phone aangepast met +31.. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
rempshaener (2025-12-08 19:22:15+00:00): Hallo,
auch hier gilt die Anmerkung zu „couplings“.
Wenn der Hydrant nicht nutzbar ist, sollte er mit disused:emergency=fire_hydrant statt emergency=fire_hydrant eingetragen werden. In „note“ ist dann der Hinweis sinnvoll, warum er nicht nutzbar ist.
Eine Anmerkung zur Nennweite: Wenn das hier https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=299068198262429&focus=photo&lat=52.157823811604&lng=11.410190271241&z=17&x=0.48945548497589647&y=0.3867274373489544&zoom=1.8523489932885906 noch aktuell ist, wäre sie 150.
Viele Grüße
rempshaener (2025-12-08 19:30:21+00:00): Hallo,
hier relevant:
- couplings
- note
- Geometrie (Hydrant mit Straße verbunden)
Viele Grüße
Senihtu (2026-04-20 12:28:19+00:00): hi!
Könntest Du Dir den Parkplatz way 234715329 nochmal genauer ansehen?
Wie kommen die Autos da wieder weg, wenn an beiden Enden des Fahrweges explizit
noexit=yes getaggt ist? Das ist doch kein Autofriedhof :-)
Gino-52 (2026-04-21 15:32:45+00:00): Da ist wohl die Einfahrt abhanden gekommen.
Hab's eingetragen.
Aber selbst ein Autofriedhof braucht eine Zufahrt.
Gruß
Robert Whittaker (2025-12-11 10:32:11+00:00): Hi,

Could you check the location where you placed the AED https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13362246001 in this changeset?

You've given it the description "AED , at Royal Oak, Laxfield , IP13 8DH", but you positioned the node outside the King's Head pub on the other side of the churchyard.

Could you also add a bit more detail to the description, e.g. is the AED inside or outside the pub, is it on a wall and if so which one?
Andrea Musuruane (2025-12-09 08:55:00+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto su OSM. In genere quando vedo un nome del genere, il numero si riferisce ad un numero civico presente in quel tratto di strada e non e' relativo al nome della stessa. Ciao, Andrea
eggie (2025-12-08 20:34:04+00:00): Beste Henddrik Hoe kunnen nu adressen plots veranderen?
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=175682549

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-12-08 20:36:06+00:00): reverted by changeset  #175685999

Wat is je bedoeling?
Die huisnummers klopten precies.

MVG
eggie
Aeuri (2025-12-19 20:45:16+00:00): Just to let you know, I'll fix it, but the edits to the parking garage at the Santa Fe County Administrative Complex, 240 Grant Ave, were incorrect.

The entrance/exit to the lower and upper levels are separate, the lower level to the west, and the upper parking deck to the east, and they are not one-way.
Arlo James Barnes (2026-01-27 02:29:14+00:00): Okay, thanks for the fix and sorry for the errors.
MarkoŠatrak (2025-12-09 10:08:58+00:00): Reverted because of node creation and used for splitting ways #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175705459
Andrea Musuruane (2025-12-09 09:05:21+00:00): Ciao. Se questa strada https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/140743327 e' interamente asfaltata, non può essere una tracktype=grade2 ma deve essere grade1. Se la superficie cambia, la strada deve essere spezzata e ad ogni tronco deve essere assegnata la superficie corretta. Ciao, Andrea
McKulkin (2026-03-28 14:00:16+00:00): I appreaciate the contribution, but I'm questioning the path # 1456980963 and the adjacent one and the next one. Have you actually done the trail? We can't have random lines in OSM. Thanks.
McKulkin (2026-03-28 14:09:48+00:00): Same with id:1456980973 . Nahei place is fenced and the path runs right through the gated area, and, as far as I know, through private property. I'm questioning the accuracy.
nikyk (2026-03-29 14:16:06+00:00): Both trails were drawn using real GPS tracks. Both tracks are uploaded to OSM, and both tracks are displayed in OSM tracks.
One track was sent by user @pwrpeach, who also drew the 1st version of trail. The second track was sent by a tourist I know from Batumi, his name is Ratmir, and he doesn't have an OSM account.
Both groups successfully passed through Nahei's private property.
McKulkin (2026-04-02 23:52:18+00:00): Hi. What about 1456980963? I don't remember a left fork in the trail 1066387643. If you went through 1066387643 , why is 1460453215 having `source=cadastral`? Did you decide to turn around? I've done both till the cross junction, but sadly I either forgot to start the recording or lost the GPX somewhere, so I can't confirm whether the current geometry of 1066387643 is right, but I remember we had to deviate a bit from the one mapped in summer '25.
nikyk (2026-04-06 11:00:07+00:00): As for path 1456980963
This path was drawn based on GPS and survey from my friend Ratmir.

As for path 1460453215
A set this tag because this path exists in "NAPR cadastral map". Do you know this map and how to add it to JOSM layers? It is very useful, but the data may become obsolete
McKulkin (2026-04-06 20:58:43+00:00): I'm using NAPR sat images, but I don't use their base layer map because it very closely resembles maps from 30 years ago in remote locations. In Tbilisi, it seems to be lagging by 2-3 years.
You can't realistically expect an old map to reflect the current situation. OK as a reference point, but definitely not something that should be blindly trusted.
NeisBot (2025-12-14 07:51:40+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Gift shop in Decatur AL"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-12-16 17:22:22+00:00): 🔴 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the original contributor or remaining promotional text in description tags by https://osm.org/changeset/176016207
eggie (2025-12-08 19:55:23+00:00): Wat je hier doet is een brug op een brug plakken.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=175682911
eggie (2025-12-08 19:57:27+00:00): De opliggende brug heb ik verwijderd. 
Wandelroute hersteld.
gr eggie
eggie (2025-12-08 20:03:52+00:00): warnings:crossing_ways:highway-waterway 	1

Opgelost  Water door duiker Turkaaweg