piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2025-10-01 13:06:55+00:00): Hi Chinyadax, welcome and thanks for your contribution!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

Based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Removed English and Arabic names from a store"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
felipeeugenio (2025-10-01 13:13:15+00:00): Hola. Buenos días.
Es realmente C con comillas? Está así en la cartelería en terreno? Me parece bastante poco común, pero para confirmar solamente.
gonzalocandiay (2025-10-01 14:33:38+00:00): Hola Felipe! Sí, es raro, pero sale con comillas en los letreros y agregaron un paradero recientemente donde también sale así.
rempshaener (2025-10-01 16:19:03+00:00): Hallo,

du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.

Du schreibst: „Zwischen allen Häusern in dieser Straße befinden sich solche Hofeinfahrten. Es wäre unsinnig diese alle hier einzuzeichnen.“
Ob ein Objekt „sinnvoll“ oder „nützlich“ ist, hängt vom subjektiven Einzelfall ab: Ein Mapper braucht Bushaltestellen, ein anderer mag Stromleitungen, ein dritter Poller.
Und: Jedes eingetragene Objekt hat jemanden Zeit und Mühe gekostet.

Sicherlich gibt es Graubereiche, insbesondere was das „Wie“, seltener was das „Ob“ angeht. Solche Zufahrten gehören nicht dazu; irgendwann werden diese annähernd vollständig erfasst sein.
Rein subjektiv kann es sicher stören, wenn einige Objekte bereits erfasst sind, andere aber (noch) nicht. Dann ist aber nicht Löschen die Lösung.

Ich habe die Zufahrt vorsorglich wiederhergestellt.

Bei Fragen bitte melden.
Viele Grüße
Tora60 (2025-10-02 07:23:13+00:00): Hallo,
wegen dieser Unsicherheit, habe ich dies zur Überprüfung eingereicht.
Vielen Dank für deine Antwort und viele Grüße.
Gregory Peony (2025-10-01 23:14:07+00:00): Hi I modified these footprints in https://osmcha.org/changesets/172727215 Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172706304
Yog Sot (2025-10-01 17:58:46+00:00): jakas brama lub tabliczka zakaz wstępu?
Feskil (2025-10-10 20:23:16+00:00): Tak, prawnie to jest teren prywatny, jest również tabliczka o tym informująca
Yog Sot (2025-10-11 23:19:09+00:00): ale informująca o zakazie?
Feskil (2025-10-13 09:14:03+00:00): Też jest B-1 prywatne postawiony
Supaplex030 (2025-10-03 21:05:40+00:00): Hallo Openminded320, bitte beachte beim "Zurücksetzen" der Wohngebietsgrenzen von der Bordsteinkante zur Grundstücksgrenze darauf, dass die landuses in Berlin vielerorts in der Vergangenheit als eine Art Bordsteinkanten-Ersatz genutzt wurden und diese Verläufe bei der Anpassung durch barrier=kerb erhalten bleiben sollten. Viele Mapper haben hier in der Vergangenheit Arbeit investiert, die auch bei solchen legitimen Anpassungen geometrisch erhalten bleiben sollte.

Wenn du die landuse=residential-Flächen von der Fahrbahn- zur Grundstückskante versetzt, lasse die ursprüngliche Bordsteinkante also bitte als barrier=kerb erhalten.

Du hast hier in der Neuruppiner Straße in Zehlendorf außerdem einige valide Straßenraumdaten wie Sperrflächen (road_marking=restriction) und Parkstände (amenity=parking) gelöscht. War das ein Versehen oder ein Missverständnis? Auch in anderen deiner Changesets habe ich gemerkt, dass du gelegentlich bestehende Kartenfeatures löschst, die aus der Ferne jedoch einen validen Eindruck machen. Bitte lösche keine Daten, nur weil du sie nicht verstehst oder relevant hältst. Andere tun dies nämlich oder nutzen diese Daten sogar aktiv in Datenprozessierungen und Anwendungen.

Beste Grüße
Alex
Krzysztoforest (2025-10-01 13:55:42+00:00): Niestety zlikwidowali boisko asfaltowe
muralito (2025-10-02 00:51:32+00:00): Hola. Me parece que el Rapid esta sugiriendo cualquier cosa. Ojo!

El Santander estaba mal y lo que le agregaste tampoco esta bien, porque son referencias a un banco español y un banco norteamericano, y no es ninguno de esos casos.

Tambien la estacion de servicio, ANCAP no es nombre, es marca.
citrula (2025-10-01 18:56:46+00:00): You added the business to the entire building. Please add it as a single point at the approximate location in the building.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172720582
daganzdaanda (2026-02-22 00:11:05+00:00): Hi dls12345, welcome to OpenStreetMap!

You checked "review requested" so I had a look at your changes. Thank you for updating the name of the uni and university buildings! 
In this changeset, you also moved the node of a bus stop and changed the tags to make it a dry cleaner, while keeping the bus stops name. I guess that was a mistake. I will move the node back where it was and make it a bus stop again. 
If there is a dry cleaner in Ashmoor Street, please add a new node there. 
Thanks again for updating the data! I believe Preston can use more active mappers :-)
Langlaeufer (2025-10-06 13:33:47+00:00): Hallo,

du hast auf die Tankstellenzufahrt oneway gepackt. Mit den Fotos von Juni kann ich das nicht nachvollziehen: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=748862441153379&focus=photo&lat=52.1041919&lng=9.3645594&z=17 . Hier existiert noch eine Linksabbiegespur für die Tankstelle.
daganzdaanda (2026-02-22 00:19:49+00:00): Hi again, dls12345!

Here you accidentally made the Uni into a kindergarten ;-D I am sure sometimes it feels like a big kindergarten... :-P
I will put the kindergarten tag on the Pre-School-Centre, and revert the change to the uni outline.
aTarom (2025-10-01 16:59:34+00:00): Hola, gràcies per editar i benvingut a OSM,  l'etiqueta
payment:tarjeta_profeesionals
a part que té dues e "ee" es tracta d'una targeta totalment exclusiva de l'hospital? o aquesta targeta serveix per a més centres de salut?
Salutacions
arte2002 (2025-10-01 21:47:44+00:00): El pàrquing ja estava creat com una àrea i com a privat
Crear un altre node seria duplicar el pàrquing, millor actualitzar l'àrea
eggie (2025-10-01 14:35:33+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback Wat is je bedoeling geweest vandeze enorme changeset?  Je commentaar is Kaart Nederland?
Je geeft niet aan wat je hebt gedaan.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-10-01 14:40:02+00:00): Reverted by changeset #172709911

Je hebt een weg aangelegd door de Noordzee. Besef dat alles wat je uitprobeert werkelijk op de wereldkaart komt bij upload. Wat is je bedoeling.
Je brengt schade toe aan de kaart met dit soort onzin.

MVG
eggie
user_5359 (2025-10-01 19:47:30+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/11639972507 more than 100 meters over streets and buildings. 
I moved the node back to the original position.
JeroenHoek (2025-10-01 19:47:56+00:00): Avéro Residentie is een old_name, maar als loc_name klopt Avérotoren of Avéroflat wel:

https://www.groetenuitleeuwarden.nl/buitenwijken/prinsclausplein.htm

https://www.facebook.com/VroegerInLeeuwarden/posts/de-av%C3%A9ro-toren-in-1996-de-woontoren-prins-clausplein-de-offici%C3%ABle-naam-van-het-g/702945888706341/
JeroenHoek (2025-10-01 19:50:05+00:00): Voor de naam van de kantoortoren geldt overigens ook dat Avéro met een accent aigu geschreven wordt.
JeroenHoek (2025-10-01 19:52:11+00:00): Kijk bij zulke zaken altijd even naar de geschiedenis. Daarin vindt je ook de bron van dit soort namen:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103654913

Jouw wijziging vermeld overigens geen bron.
Puntertje (2025-10-01 22:17:46+00:00): Beste JeroenHoek, dank voor de opmerking. Mijn excuses voor het niet vermelden van de bron. Ik had mijn wijziging gebaseerd op de website van de architect (https://abebonnema.nl/werk/woontoren-prins-clausplein-voorheen-avero-residentie/). Dank voor het wijzen op de bronnen van de originele changeset 103654913. Ik kan echter het eerste artikel niet lezen zonder abonnement en de tweede link gaat volgens mij alleen over de Avérotoren aan de Lange Marktstraat en niet over deze flat?
Misschien is het mogelijk om twee old/loc names toe te voegen, maar ik ben niet bekend in dit gebied, dus pas het vooral zelf aan naar wat u denkt dat beter is. Het leek mij een beetje verwarrend dat er twee torens zijn die precies dezelfde (loc)name hebben. Groet Puntertje
JeroenHoek (2025-10-02 06:45:24+00:00): Zie ook de linkjes die ik postte, zoals die historische foto op Facebook.

Namen zijn wel vaker niet uniek; dat is ook geen voorwaarde. De nieuwere toren heeft de (bij)naam van de oudere verdrongen. Let bij het aanpassen van met name loc_name en reg_name op dat het daar om lokale namen gaat.

De website van de architect zal zich daar niet mee bezig houden, maar vaak komen die namen uit de kennis van lokale mappers (hier E de Wit).

Zodra je bij lokale historische bronnen kijkt zie je de naam opduiken:

https://historischcentrumleeuwarden.nl/onderzoek/beeldbank/zoeken-in-de-beeldbank/detail/e9503724-aea9-11e3-a7db-2b4fb4d81b3a/media/34eacb31-4540-c92e-baff-2f7e141c7415?mode=detail&view=horizontal&q=av%C3%A9rotoren&rows=1&page=30

Tags zoals *_name kunnen meerdere namen bevatten met een puntkomma gescheiden. Hier is dat niet nodig, omdat Avéro Residentie een old_name is. Niemand noemt die flat nu zo.

Bij een complexere naamgeschiedenis kunnen de name-tags met jaartallen uitgebreid worden:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/585340828
JeroenHoek (2025-10-02 06:51:43+00:00): Ik heb het aangepast. De spelling op Wikidata ook trouwens.
Gregory Peony (2025-10-02 16:38:40+00:00): Hi, I'm provideing a review since you requested it. All footprints you mapped represent buildings and have been appropriately squared, please take care to exclude the shadows on the ground from the size of a building's footprint. The highways seem generally reasonably mapped and tagged with a few minor inaccuracies. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172709779
Konkon153 (2026-01-11 11:18:17+00:00): Hallo einnutzer72,
ich wollte kurz erfragen woher die Bezeichnung "Diekholzer Straße" stammt.
Die Stadt Plau am See hat als Straßennamen offiziell "Diekholzener Straße" bekanntgegeben. (s. https://plauamsee.de/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/04-04-2024-Bekanntmachung-Neubenennung-der-Strassen-Gewerbegebiet-Rostocker-Chaussee.pdf)
einnutzer72 (2026-04-26 15:57:56+00:00): Hallo!
Da habe ich wohl 2 Buchstaben vergessen. Kann passieren.
Danke für die Korrektur
Konkon153 (2026-04-26 17:13:49+00:00): Alles klar, kein Problem ;)
custodiankeyy (2025-10-01 14:53:07+00:00): Bir önceki değişiklik setinize yapılan yoruma bakabilir misiniz? Bazı binalar hava görüntüsünde halen gözüküyor.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172634339
foreigner037 (2025-10-18 10:22:01+00:00): Hi, 

please don't tag reservoirs by a node. See: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:water%3Dreservoir
Gladius Thrax (2025-10-19 09:25:37+00:00): My bad.

Are you local to the area?
foreigner037 (2025-10-19 10:43:35+00:00): Hi,

not directly. Still, this is general best practices.
Gregory Peony (2025-10-01 16:42:45+00:00): Welcome to OSM and thank you for your contribution! 

When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom in so that you can see the outline of the building and mark the corners carefully. Exclude shadows and yards when tracing the footprint. Keep in mind that you are looking at the [roofs of buildings](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape#Roof_shape), but mapping their footprints. Depending on how the scene is lit, pitched roofs may have light and dark sections that belong to one building. Generally pitched roofs overhang the walls of a building, so a footprint slightly smaller than the roof is accurate. You can scale selected features in ID with shift+(-/+), or JOSM with ctrl.+alt+Lclick & drag.  Take care to make contributions that others can build upon.

After tracing and tagging features which are likely square or round, please remember to square their corners (q), or circularise them (o), because it is almost impossible and time consuming to draw shapes so percisely by hand. Buildings with metal or pitched roofs tend to have square corners; round buildings are identifiable by the distinctive cresent shaped shadow they cast. Unless the building is clearly a different shape then it's best to assume that it should be rounded or its corners should be squared. In the iD Editor, you can right click for access to editing functions. Since roofs tend to overhang walls trace the initial shape slightly smaller to allow a buffer for any change in size that may occur. In JOSM use the [buildingstools plugin](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/BuildingsTools). In ID you must draw the shape accurately enough else shapes will not completely square. This [video about squaring features in ID](https://youtu.be/Xs5wX592E1o) has more information and a demo.

Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
NeisBot (2025-10-01 14:54:40+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-10-03 12:54:09+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/172790235
AndyB_66 (2025-10-01 15:18:22+00:00): Please keep your changesets local!
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-02 03:54:44+00:00): mapowanie stacji przepustu - przepraszam za zły opis ale Vespucci coś dziwnego z interfejsem zrobił i źle klikam
Roydon Olive (2025-10-02 04:40:41+00:00): If you have any questions about this new area of fort whyte I'm happy to help update the map. I've been there several times and made a bunch of updates already.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-02 03:54:15+00:00): mapowanie przepustu i rzeki  - przepraszam za zły opis ale Vespucci coś dziwnego z interfejsem zrobił i źle klikam
aaei924 (2025-10-02 00:27:53+00:00): 안녕하세요, 편집하신 부분에 의문점이 있어 댓글 남깁니다.
교차로명 뒤에 '-나들목'을 추가하셨는데, 실제 표지판에는 이 부분이 없기 때문에 임의로 추가하신 이유를 여쭙고자 합니다.

나들목임은 motorway_junction 태그 자체로 충분히 설명되고 있고, 똑같은 교차로여도 어디는 -나들목이고 어디는 -교차로로 되어 있기 때문에, 현장에 있는 실제 표기를 기준으로 정확하게 구분할 필요가 있다는 것이 최초 편집 당시의 견해입니다.
rhtb0 (2025-10-02 13:49:26+00:00): 뒤에 나들목등 표기가 없다고 해도 소요산나들목을 부를때 소요산이라고 하지 않고 ic등을 꼭 붙여서 적었습니다. 더군다나 동두천나들목은 표지판 위에 명칭이 있지도 않습니다.
aaei924 (2025-10-03 00:22:40+00:00): 답변하여 주셔서 감사합니다.
일반적으로 대상을 부를 때 뒤에 -나들목 내지 -교차로를 붙인다는 점은 이해합니다.

다만, -나들목 또는 -교차로가 표지판에 없는 경우 명칭에서 빼는 것이 좋다고 생각되는 이유가 여럿 있습니다.

1. On the ground 원칙을 되도록 따라야 합니다
다른 명칭보다도 표지판에 있는 명칭이 매핑에서 우선되는 이유입니다. 지도 사용자가 실제 현장에서 인식 가능한 명칭을 사용하는 것이 바람직합니다. 표지판에 -교차로나 -IC를 붙여 적는 경우가 분명히 존재하므로, 이를 임의로 고치지 않아야 합니다. (특히 청산IC를 청산나들목으로 고친 건)

2. 실제로 나들목과 교차로는 특별한 기준으로 구분되지 않습니다.
입체교차로에만 나들목을 붙이신 것으로 보입니다만, 현장에서는 입체교차로에도 -교차로가 붙는 등 구분 없이 사용됩니다. 이처럼 나들목과 교차로 중 무엇을 붙여야 하는지 정확히 인식되기 어려우므로, 원칙대로 철저히 표지판의 표기에 따라야 합니다.

참고로 동두천IC의 경우 상행 기준 진출차로가 갈라지는 지점에 있는 표지판에 명칭이 적혀 있습니다.
하봉암IC의 경우 하봉암 교차로로 바꾸셨던데, 회전교차로(하봉암 교차로)와 나들목(하봉암IC)이 서로 구분되는 명칭을 가지고 있습니다.
skorasaurus (2026-01-03 22:22:47+00:00): thanks for adding ;)
saikofish (2026-01-06 14:25:41+00:00): I was just listening to the podcast explaining how they built the neighborhood and cul-de-sac in real life, and was wondering if anyone actually added it to the map :)

I don't suppose we're really allowed to call it Cielo Rosado Court though ... are we?
LordGarySugar (2026-01-06 19:01:37+00:00): I don't think it would be wrong to add that name, as there is no other existing name for this street. For example, the Eastenders set has all the street names and pois mapped (not using standard tags). Presumably the landuse=residential needs to be changed to some kind of commercial/film studio area, as I didn't realise it was a purpose built area when I originally mapped here.
Glassman (2025-10-04 19:09:12+00:00): I have reverted this edit which had crossing motorways. Also noted that older bing imagery was used. ESRI world imagery is more recent.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-02 03:53:53+00:00): mapowanie stacji kolejower i jej parkingu - przepraszam za zły opis ale Vespucci coś dziwnego z interfejsem zrobił i źle klikam
user_5359 (2025-10-01 19:33:29+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/1925455810
 more than 100 meters over streets and buildings. 
I moved the node back to the original position.
rempshaener (2025-10-05 18:09:04+00:00): Hallo,
dein CS-Kommentar besagt „Specify fire hydrant diameters“, tatsächlich hast du aber 13 Hydranten gelöscht. Direkt der erste den ich nachgeschlagen habe existiert, siehe https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=3591883144426113&focus=photo
Handelt es sich um ein Versehen?
Viele Grüße
Neb the B (2025-10-06 13:06:55+00:00): Hallo rempshaener,
danke für die Info. Ich hab die Änderung über StreetConnect gemacht. Die Option war missverständlich. Gefragt war nach dem Schild. Hier habe ich die Option "Existiert nicht" gewählt. Das bezog sich dann offensichtlich auf den Hydrant selbst und nicht auf da Schild. Sorry. Alle Änderungen "löschen" von Hydranten die ich vorgenommen habe sind demnach falsche und können rückgängig gemacht werden. Wie kann ich das tun?
rempshaener (2025-10-06 18:40:22+00:00): Hallo,
kein Problem, ich habe die Hydranten wiederhergestellt und fire_hydrant:diameter:signed=no ergänzt.
Viele Grüße
Neb the B (2025-10-07 05:34:49+00:00): Danke Dir und liebe Grüße.
aaei924 (2025-10-29 03:50:36+00:00): Hello, I want to tell you something about your edits on bridges and tunnels.

I saw you've changed 'name' tag to bridge or tunnel's name. However, some of your edits were not seemed to be appropriate. Because the 'highway=*' tag refers to road, not the physical bridge or tunnel structures. Therefore using their name on 'name' tags even on named roads is discouraged.
In those case, you had better use 'tunnel:name' or 'bridge:name' tag instead.
Gregory Peony (2025-10-08 23:56:50+00:00): Please take care when mapping beyond task boundaries in an active project; it seems like  you added some duplicate building footprints due to this. don't worry I resolved them.
Fan map 2 (2025-10-01 18:34:38+00:00): Ta "radosna twórczość" ma swoje odzwierciedlenie w uchwale rady miasta oraz na znakach w terenie. Przywróciłem.
Frans S (2025-10-02 09:54:28+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please square each rectangular building with the Q key while it is still selected.
Best regards
stasiu512 (2025-10-01 17:03:47+00:00): dzięki, teraz to będę 3 razy już sprawdzać czy jest poprawnie;)
AlexSpritze (2025-11-27 07:44:17+00:00): Hi Vogelsangxx, that stationary shop "Blattgold" was already on the map so I removed your addition.
Regards
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-10-02 10:59:51+00:00): Can you specify which information tell you it is prohibited to pedestrians here? There is no sign and it makes some shops on the "Desserte" not accessible to foot traffic. It is not pedestrian friendly, but I am pretty sure it is not prohibited. Thanks!
pb&je89 (2025-10-11 16:27:05+00:00): I'm pretty sure that you are right, that there are no prohibition along the side of the desserte, I was using Streetcomplete and there was no option for "no footpath".

However I would not recommend it.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-10-12 09:42:10+00:00): I do not recommend it either, but to access shops on the roadside, we must keep foot access. Thanks!
burrscurr (2025-10-01 17:10:49+00:00): (Falscher Changeset-Kommentar: Hier keine UK-style crossing_refs, sondern irrtümliche Verwendung von crossing_ref=unmarked statt crossing=unmarked)
mcliquid (2025-10-10 06:51:10+00:00): I'm wondering why information=board is set to razed:-Lifecycle-Prefix, but tags such as name, ele, note, check_date, board_type, map_size, map_type, hiking, etc. remain normal?
quincylvania (2025-10-11 19:56:41+00:00): `information` is treated as a top-level tag by some apps like Nominatim and as a subtype tag by many others. Adding the namespace creates additional safety to prevent more apps from treating these as active data. See another example: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/disused%3Aparking
quincylvania (2025-10-11 19:58:50+00:00): Oh and it would be fine to add the namespace to the other tags as well if we could be sure they referred to the razed feature and not a potential current feature tagged on the same entity. Namespacing `information` is safe since it's supposed to be a direct subtype.
mcliquid (2025-10-10 06:51:36+00:00): I'm wondering why information=* is set to was:-Lifecycle-Prefix, but tags such as name, ele, note, check_date, board_type, map_size, map_type, hiking, etc. remain normal?
custodiankeyy (2025-10-03 19:16:40+00:00): İsmin tamamını büyük harf yapma nedeniniz nedir?
Matt McCutchen (2025-10-01 17:23:43+00:00): Correction to changeset message: I don't remember whether the bookcase belongs to 10 or 11 Scotch Mist Court.  The location is approximately correct from GPS (I guess I should have added that as a source).
Matt McCutchen (2025-10-01 17:49:00+00:00): I also consulted Esri World Imagery to try to refine the location, so that should be a source too.
mcliquid (2025-10-10 06:52:07+00:00): I'm wondering why information=* is set to abandoned:-Lifecycle-Prefix, but tags such as covered, description, operator, name, ele, note, check_date, board_type, map_size, map_type, hiking, etc. remain normal?
SomeoneElse2 (2025-10-05 13:00:41+00:00): This looks like a mechanical edit.  Was it discussed anywhere?
I'm pretty familiar with the sort of edge cases that occur around lifecycle tags on tourism=information, and would suggest that diving in with level0 was only a sensible option if each individual occurrence had been checked beforehand.
quincylvania (2025-10-05 14:22:24+00:00): Hi there. This is a pretty routine type of edit and was not discussed. I'm happy to revert if it messed up any data.

I think your argument has been that `information=*` can be used without `tourism=information` to indicate that something provides information without being a tourist feature? This is essentially treating `information` as a top-level tag on par with `tourism`, instead of as a dependent tag. If you agree with this pattern then I'd hope you'd support my tagging proposal. But either way, it doesn't make sense that the tourist component of a feature could be destroyed while the information part remains.
mcliquid (2025-10-10 06:52:29+00:00): I'm wondering why information=* is set to demolished:-Lifecycle-Prefix, but tags such as operator, name, ele, note, check_date, board_type, map_size, map_type, hiking, etc. remain normal?
*abq* (2025-11-15 12:12:16+00:00): High Peter, 
hiking pathes in forests should not be mapped as footway, but path instead. 
Regards,
Reiner
mcliquid (2025-10-10 06:52:55+00:00): I'm wondering why information=* is set to proposed:-Lifecycle-Prefix, but tags such as ref, description, operator, name, ele, note, check_date, board_type, website, map_type, hiking, etc. remain normal?
ilias_ (2025-10-01 17:41:16+00:00): Merci Aurélien !