piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
KiloThree (2024-06-25 17:37:12+00:00): You removed a crossing that was richly tagged and replaced it with a minimally tagged crossing, ways 1258468691 and 1295951206. This removed tacticle paving information. Please also be sure that whenever you are replacing cycleway tags with separate ways, you maintain or update the information on what sort of way is being mapped. As increasingly the cycleway key is being used in the Boston area to map things that are not grade separated, dedicated cycleways, but instead on street lanes, the bike network and routing information for the region is degraded. Bike routing tools increasingly cannot note a difference between paint and hardscape separation, and increasingly cannot include street names in routing
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153136217
mcliquid (2024-06-25 06:42:30+00:00): Hi and thank you for your contribution!

Please note for the future: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
adiatmad (2024-06-25 15:25:45+00:00): Halo jinno09, Anda menambahkan banyak tag name=Rumah di OSM. Itu sepertinya tidak perlu. Bisa dicek di halaman Wiki ini (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions). Saran saya, cukup pakai tag building=house tanpa name=Rumah.

Kali aja belum tahu, ada Telegram OSM Indonesia (https://t.me/osmindonesia). Silakan bergabung jika berkenan
emersonveenstra (2024-06-27 13:00:57+00:00): Hi there,

I've removed the name from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/982138127, since it already belongs to the Flathead and Lake County boundaries, there's no reason to add that as a name
emersonveenstra (2024-06-26 11:28:23+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/442720059#map=19/42.24593/-83.60983 you have lanes:backward and lanes:forward on a oneway street, and on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/8729668 the lane counts don't add up. Could you please fix those? Thanks!
emersonveenstra (2024-06-26 11:30:02+00:00): Also the lane counts on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1295965968 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1295965969 need to be fixed as well, thanks!
liebezeit (2024-06-27 00:23:21+00:00): OK, I think I've got this section correct now.
emersonveenstra (2024-06-28 15:36:58+00:00): thanks!
◪ Jarv (2024-06-27 12:49:08+00:00): Hi Ravi18, you've requested a review on this change. Looks fine. However you can press "Q" once you've drawn the shape to give it 90 degree angles. Also the building could have been tagged with "house" instead of "yes"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153138372
Ilovemap1999 (2024-06-27 04:01:55+00:00): check the restriction carefully before edit perhaps using mapillary, if you don't have proofs or images to show, dont edit
Hung Tran 9x0 (2024-07-01 17:54:34+00:00): There are definitely left turn restrictions from Ham Nghi to Le Duc Tho and from Nguyen Hoang to Le Duc Tho. Next time, I will take some photos and upload them as proof.
Ilovemap1999 (2024-07-01 17:59:35+00:00): I know but 'no left turn restrictions' which added by you, were created before. Not only this changeset but also all the restrictions you added were duplicated. If you wonder if the restrictions already added or not, you can access to"https://ahorn.lima-city.de/tr/" to check the restrictions
mcliquid (2024-06-25 06:42:24+00:00): Hi and thank you for your contribution!

Please note for the future: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
silversurfer83 (2024-06-25 13:40:21+00:00): Moin :)

ist die Tiefgarage denn außerhalb der in den conditionals genannten Zeiten geschlossen?
Falls das der Fall ist, wäre es vielleicht angebrachter diese Zeiten einfach als Öffnungszeiten anzugeben. Dass nur 2h geparkt werden darf, ist ja erkennbar.

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153139655
yvecai (2024-06-29 05:41:31+00:00): Salut, pourquoi avoir enlevé les Tags piste:type=nordic sur les pistes de ski de fond ?
Hello, why did you remove piste:type = nordic on way used as cross-country ski pistes?
Yves
Nemesuisse (2024-06-29 16:31:18+00:00): Salut,
J'ai remis en mode "chemin 4x4" (vocation 1ère) mais effectivement l'éditeur a supprimé le tag nordic alors que les 2 semblent compatibles. 
Je remettrai à l'occasion , y'a pas mal de lignes en duplication à nettoyer de toute façon.
Merci du signalement ;)
yvecai (2024-06-29 18:31:47+00:00): Ah oui, l'éditeur Id à tendance à faire ça quand on utilise les presets, c'est un peu nul.
Sinon, Josm marché très bien ;-)
phoenixsaigon1698 (2024-06-29 05:04:20+00:00): Hello bạn, tại sao bạn lại xóa way để quay đầu vậy? Mình có ảnh thực địa Mapillary làm bằng chứng là có chỗ quay đầu ở đây!
phoenixsaigon1698 (2024-06-29 05:05:57+00:00): Bạn edit bằng ảnh vệ tinh, bằng app thì có nhìn thấy được ảnh StreetView không vậy?
phoenixsaigon1698 (2024-06-29 05:09:07+00:00): Trước khi bạn delete bất kỳ một loại dữ liệu nào trên OSM hãy xem history của way,node,relation_id đó được tạo bởi ai, lí do họ tạo, chỉnh sửa là gì. Chứ đừng delete mà không có lí do gì cả!
Warin61 (2024-06-26 00:57:42+00:00): Hi,
In Austrlai we associate an address with a building, not the entrance way. In the case of Node: 12008941940 this appears to be the entrance to a vehicle garage, not the residence. 

The address for Node: 12008889339 is incorrect, see the DCS Base Map! 

The buildings appear to be offset and not well recognized. Use the DCS Imagery for better resolution and location accuracy. Observe the vehicle driveways to see which are garages?
Dawid2849 (2024-06-25 22:31:28+00:00): Dzięki za sprzątnięcie, miałem to na swojej liście rzeczy do zrobienia
HirschKauz (2024-06-25 15:24:50+00:00): Hi  OvonH !!
JEDER changeset ist ein 'update' :-) 
Bitte tu Deinen Mitmapper einen Gefallen und lies dies im Wiki: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments 
Grüße
HirschKauz (2024-06-25 15:26:57+00:00): besser als [Update]: 
[update Schützenplatz Jever]
rskedgell (2024-06-25 08:46:06+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Rather than using amenity=office, which is deprecated and unlikely to be rendered on maps, a tag like office=accountant, office=financial_advisor, or office=tax_advisor should be used.

Adding your address would probably  also help people find you.

I have added links to the relevant documentation below, but please let me know if you need any help.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses_in_the_United_Kingdom
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:office
Frans S (2024-06-28 09:07:47+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
A: Buildings not accurated drawn
E: Buildings not squared.
G: included shadow

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153142312
jomamoj (2024-12-02 09:54:54+00:00): In diesem Changeset wurden die Stockwerke geändert: aus 0 wurde 1 und aus 1 wurde 2. Wenn der way/1145121982 auf Ebene 2 wechselt, muss konsequenterweise way/1039313142 auch auf Ebene 2 geändert werden.
stadt-koeln-rutha (2024-12-05 12:33:48+00:00): Ich bitte den Unterschied zwischen den tags layer vs. level zu beachten! layer=2 bedeutet nicht, dass etwas im 2. Geschoss liegt. Dafür ist der tag level geeignet! Mit freundlichen Grüßen
jomamoj (2024-12-05 20:29:39+00:00): In Bezug auf Indoor-Tagging ist es korrekt, dass Level das korrekte Tag ist. Allerdings werden beim Indoor-Tagging normalerweise keine Wege mit highway=* getaggt. Bei Straßen sind Layer Tags üblicher, auch z.B. bei Tiefgaragen und Parkhäusern. 

Davon abgesehen, sollte auch beim Layer Tag 0 die Erdoberfläche sein. Es ist nicht sinnvoll das ebenerdige Stockwerk 0 als Layer 1 zu taggen: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153142412
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153142357
stadt-koeln-rutha (2024-12-06 09:42:17+00:00): Da gebe ich Ihnen vollkommen Recht. Hier hat sich bei mir der Fehlerteufel eingeschlichen. Dafür möchte ich mich entschuldigen. Sollte noch Klärungsbedarf bestehen, melden Sie sich bitte gerne bei mir! Korrekturen haben Sie ja soweit schon übernommen. Danke.
jomamoj (2024-12-02 16:49:15+00:00): Die Einfahrt in das Parkhaus ist ebenerdig auf Ebene 0 laut Beschilderung im Parkhaus. Dementsprechend sollte das Tag layer=0 sein. Die Zufahrtsstraße way/1039313149 wäre entsprechend layer=-1. 

Warum wurde in diesem Changeset das Tag tunnel=building_passage entfernt?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153142412
Frans S (2024-06-26 12:17:25+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
You ignored the warnings on the issue triangle. It mentioned that you mapped several buildings over already mapped buildings. (2019) Probably because you did not zoom in far enough to get them in your view. 
Check the bottom line. It mentioned that there are hidden mappings.
btw. Your mappings are rather sloppy as well. Probably because you did not zoom in far enough.

Best regards
Frans S (2024-06-25 10:29:49+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 
However, The buildings are not squared.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153142800
Langlaeufer (2024-06-27 19:10:00+00:00): Danke dir. Leider hinterlassen die Bearbeitungen von MariusEbe noch größere Probleme als nur die fehlende Anpassung von sidewalk. Insbesondere das die Fußwege oft nicht angeschossen sind / keine Überwege eingezeichnet werden.
Grüße Langläufer
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153142849
Frans S (2024-06-25 10:22:19+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Buildings not always accurate mapped.
Buildings not squared. 

connected node of building to other building.

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153142936
user_17222985 (2024-06-25 07:27:54+00:00): замінив неправильний landuse=farmyard на меншого розміру
martinst (2026-07-04 06:08:33+00:00): access-Einträge überflüssig, zurückgeändert in Changeset 185075856
Frans S (2024-06-25 10:16:40+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)

Inaccurate mapped. Follow the rooflines more precise.

Buildings not squared.

Included yard into a building.

Connected nodes of buildings to highway.

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153143199
Frans S (2024-06-25 10:26:39+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 
However, not all buildings are squared properly.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153143247
ElliottPlack (2024-07-09 07:22:44+00:00): Hi there, another user is claiming most of what you've mapped here is not in fact private. can you clarify? If people are allowed to walk around on the roads but cars are not allowed, then you should not add the blanket access=private tag. Perhaps sharing what sources you have will help other mappers understand.
ElliottPlack (2024-07-09 07:23:19+00:00): Edit: signature:

thanks,  

Elliott Plack  
OSMF Data Working Group
pmarkina_lyft (2024-07-12 11:53:10+00:00): Hi, ElliottPlack!
My name is Polina, and I’m a mapper in the OSM team at Lyft.
The key difference between the access and motor_vehicle tags is that “access” affects pedestrians as well. Therefore, I agree with StreetSurveyor's edits that it would be clearer to use motor_vehicle=private here.
However, since pedestrian paths along the road are already mapped as separate ways in OSM, and there is a sign stating 'Authorized vehicles only' as seen in a Lyft-owned image (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1CJUYin38UvV5fS3kLtE9WXF1jcutgnvB/view?usp=drive_link), and at the time of our edits, the bicycle=yes tag was present, adding the access=private tag also seems acceptable in this context.

Best regards, Polina.
Frans S (2024-06-25 10:24:42+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)

Buildings not accurate mapped. Follow the rooflines more accurate.

Buildings not squared.

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153143379
Frans S (2024-06-25 10:13:18+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Buildings inaccurate mapped. Follow the rooflines more precise.

Included shadow of the building

Buildings not squared.

Quality prevails above quantity !!
Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153143390
Frans S (2024-06-25 10:19:33+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Very inaccurate mapped. (sloppy) 

Clustered buildings

Included yard

Buildings not squared. 

Please take the time to map. Quality prevails above quantity.

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153143399
Frans S (2024-06-25 10:08:46+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Inaccurate mapped. (follow the rooflines more precise.)

Buildings not squared.

Clustered buildings.

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153143494
Frans S (2024-06-25 09:31:28+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Inaccurate mapped. 

Follow the rooflines more precise.

Connected nodes of buildings to other buildings.

Buildings not squared.

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153143569
Frans S (2024-06-25 09:30:04+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Buildings not squared.
Connected nodes of buildings to a highway.

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153143608
Frans S (2024-06-25 09:24:45+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Inaccurate mapped. Follow the rooflines more precise.
Not a single building squared.

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153143655
akimapbuilder (2024-06-25 09:21:34+00:00): You draw building over backyard, try to avoid that. Thanks
Layft Greater (2024-06-25 07:52:43+00:00): changeset/153143802
changeset/152863975
changeset/152864087
changeset/152864155
Layft Greater (2024-06-25 07:53:19+00:00): Some roads might actually be "highway=trunk" but missing "maxspeed" infomation to be mapped as such
themi97 (2024-06-26 07:31:11+00:00): Why do you change the road class. Some roads even though are numbered as EXXX are considered primary. e.g. Iroon Avenue (https://www.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?url=http://eservices.dls.moi.gov.cy/arcgis/rest/services/National/Topography_GR/MapServer/12) Please stop undoing these type of changes. Especially when they are based on official governmental data. Thanks
Layft Greater (2024-06-26 08:54:05+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153188436
JacekMarek (2024-07-23 22:54:47+00:00): Zestaw zmian: 154231722 przywraca błędne dane. Drogi te to teren Kampinoskiego Parku Narodowego, zakaz poruszania się poza szlakami (Ustawa o ochronie przyrody, Dz.U.2023.0.1336, Art. 15. ochr. przyr. pkt 1 podpunkt 15). 

Proszę cofnąć psujące mapę zmiany, w innym wypadku będę musiał zgłosić to jako wandalizm
Leo Slager (2024-06-26 10:37:06+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community