piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-01 14:02:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 174063813, 174063778, 174063039, 174063675, 174063839, 174063864, 174063733, 174063852, 174063722, 174063049, 174063081, 174063378, 174063746, 174063119, 174063802, 174063878 where the changeset comment is: Following a DWG complaint, reverting a dubious import.  See e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1311170850 https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18848
arjunaraoc (2023-08-04 23:43:41+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia)
Please use building=house
Please provide more explanatory comments  such as added buildings in <place name>
I have fixed the issues with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139461115
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139236366
Fizzie-DWG (2023-08-05 03:04:31+00:00): Hello Frank Guy 1020304050. Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7391. Graeme Fitzpatrick, OSMF Data Working Group
MxxCon (2023-08-01 23:55:48+00:00): Hello.
Is this change accurate? Satellite and street imagery from March of this year shows that it's still a 2-way street.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139236579
atsialiak_lyft (2023-08-02 10:17:10+00:00): Hi, MxxCon!
In this case, I used Lyft's street level images, dated June-July 2023, where we can see the sign indicating a one-way road in all the photos taken from different streets:

from Southern Boulevard, coordinates 40.8350804, -73.8885922 
https://drive.google.com/file/d/123iob2OkxXGDzr6po7DKu0dI4Rp49SxU/view?usp=sharing

from Longfellow Avenue, coordinate 40.8339141, -73.8851530
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1EDPPSoS30PTNN3nr7uD5qS4HyqgPaKS2/view?usp=sharing

from Boone Avenue, coordinates 40.8340905, -73.8839757
https://drive.google.com/file/d/18cXdAR5FqxV6cvE9f2dLKYph9SuKPpwW/view?usp=sharing

at the end of East 173rd Street before the intersection with West Farms Road, markings pointing to one-way traffic, coordinates 40.8336563, -73.8832835
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ZLiQhf756V-izm-jXZq35w5mGSE7UdpA/view?usp=sharing

Please, contact us, if you have any additional questions. Thanks for your contribution!

Regards,
Aksana
MxxCon (2023-08-03 00:37:19+00:00): Alright. This looks like a more recent road change than what I saw. 👍
stick2 (2023-07-31 10:08:36+00:00): This section certainly is not only one lane
stick2 (2023-07-31 10:07:12+00:00): This section certainly is not only one lane
BCNorwich (2023-07-31 12:01:07+00:00): Hi stick2, Unfortunately, lots of roads were removed. I've now reinstated the roads and amended the tags to their previous state.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2023-07-31 11:11:14+00:00): Hi,
Urgent!!!!!!!!

Now you're deleting the whole highway. Maybe several highways.
Please don't delete any more features, I'll try now to reinstate the deleted roads.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2023-07-31 11:59:14+00:00): OK, that's all the deleted highways reinstated and I think all the tags are reverted to the state before your first amendments. So no harm done.

Regards Bernard.
Znaika (2023-12-28 14:27:13+00:00): Hallo.
warum hast du es geändert?
Hier ist dr neue Kreisverkehr!!!
Gruß,
Znaika
Znaika (2023-12-28 14:44:14+00:00): Sorry. Du war's nicht. Es war der https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145077440.
Gruß, Z
BCNorwich (2023-07-31 11:58:37+00:00): OK, that's all the deleted highways reinstated and I think all the tags are reverted to the state before your first amendments. So no harm done.

Regards Bernard.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-07-31 06:40:13+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/888943177

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-08-04 19:22:56+00:00): The correct English name for the park probably would be just Gagarin park or at least Gagarin's park. Please check stuff like this in translators.
MxxCon (2023-08-02 00:01:15+00:00): Hello.
This street also appears to be 2-way. Are you sure about your changes?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139237147
atsialiak_lyft (2023-08-02 10:19:56+00:00): Hi, MxxCon! 
All edits were made based on the freshest available data. In this case, I used Lyft's street level image dated 7/21/23 (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1KoUS_q-TujgvY4F_lbpQCnGx6e_j4xFh/view?usp=sharing) taken at the intersection of streets 60th Lane and 75th Avenue from the side of 75th Avenue (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/198924817), coordinates 40.6985406, -73.8944695, where we can see the new "No Left turn", "oneway" and "Do not enter" signs. Our telemetry data also indicate one-way traffic on this road section (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1lhMl1wqPhsyNqVWzeNmchWuYwxEPEfbF/view?usp=sharing).

Please, contact us, if you have any additional questions. Thanks for your contribution!

Regards,
Aksana
HellMap (2023-07-31 12:33:37+00:00): Hi!

Did you mean to add `smoothness=impassable` to steps https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/420369145 ? Have they been destroyed or something?
artuuurs (2023-07-31 19:50:12+00:00): Šo man būs grūtāk paskaidrot :) Lieta tāda, ka https://rigasrogainings.lv/ saviem rogainingiem lieto OSM un kartē ceļu braucamību ar velo attēlo ar garākām un īsākām raustītām līnijām, par pamatu ņemot smoothness vērtību. Šobrīd es palīdzu sagatavot karti Ādažu posmam, kas notiks septembrī. Smoothness vērtības tiek liktas ar domu, cik labi ceļš ir braucams ar velo. Impassable šajā kontekstā nozīmē, ka nav braucams ar velo. Protams, tas gluži neatbilst sākotnējai smoothness idejai. Asfaltētie ceļi kartē tiek zīmēti īpaši, neatkarīgi no smoothness, tāpēc asfaltētiem ceļiem neko nelieku. Šīs konkrētās trepes ir tik īsas, ka tās kartē praktiski nebūs redzamas, līdz ar to tas nav svarīgi un var to vērtību dzēst ārā. Bet kopumā, ja Tu vērtē šādu smoothness kā "velo braucamības" lietošanu par nevēlamu un vari iedomāties kādu labāku variantu - varu iedot organizatoru galvenā karšu zīmētāja kontaktus auglīgai diskusijai :)
HellMap (2023-08-01 17:22:22+00:00): Hmm, tagad skaidrs kādam mērķis un ar kādu domu. Man likās tu varbūt gribēji atzīmēt, ka te trepes nobrukušas vai kaut kas tāds.

Ilgi domāju, neko neizdomāju. Bet teorētiski `smoothness` ir domāts transportam ar riteņiem - mašīna, motocikls, velo, skrejriteņi, ratiņkrēsls, utt. Tāpēc protams vajadzētu lietot standarta un atbilstošas vērtības, ne tikai no velo viedokļa. Lietot to vietās, kur kustība ar ritošiem transportlīdzekļiem nav paredzēta man šķiet bezjēdzīgi. Pasaulē īpaši daudz nav lietots kopā ar trepēm, bet ir lietots it kā atzīmējot gājējiem smoothness - cik tas pareizi, nezinu - wiki neko tādu neapraksta.
4004 (2023-08-06 22:00:52+00:00): а мне кажется, это уже угловое здание по Кирова? https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=266182948574676&focus=photo
или там новый аншлаг?
eggie (2023-07-31 07:38:04+00:00): Da's mooi... 
Graag nog wel de regel construction=residential verwijderen  en aan de brug layer=1 toevoegen..
Mvg
eggie
shuisman (2023-07-31 08:20:21+00:00): Dank voor de feedback.
Wat doet de layer=1 ?
eggie (2023-07-31 09:11:27+00:00): Hoi.. layer=1 lost de foutmelding van de brug die boven het water ligt.
Het water is zeg maar 0.. dat is default. De brug ligt een verdieping hoger.

Een duiker ..tunnel=culvert waterway=drain.. krijgt bv layer=-1
Mapse..
eggie
InfosReseaux (2023-08-01 22:40:27+00:00): Bonsoir

La ligne électrique que vous avez rajouté dans ce changeset n'existe plus depuis l'année dernière : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1193479862
Elle est malheureusement encore visible sur l'imagerie aérienne et les données ouvertes mais il faut la supprimer

Merci par avance
Patchi (2023-08-02 05:16:12+00:00): Bonjour InfoReseaux,

Merci pour l'information. La ligne a été supprimée.

Bonne continuation,

Patchi.
DeKaN (2023-08-27 08:47:33+00:00): Не надо добавлять полосы на дороге как отдельные дороги и не занимайтесь завышением статусов дорог
wolfbert (2025-05-30 07:12:47+00:00): Zur Info, ich habe die Geschwindigkeitsänderung in St. Stefan rückgängig gemacht. Soweit ich erkennen kann, gilt dort eine 30er-Zone von 7-19, sonst 50. Du hast das aber auf durchgängig 30 geändert.
wambacher (2023-08-01 14:18:16+00:00): aha, hier warst du wohl vorher aktiv.
Du benutzt wohl ein josm-template, oder?

Gruss
walter
Vinber-Pro (2023-07-31 07:47:59+00:00): Salut Brice,
chouette le test d'osmand, mais stp, peux-tu préciser un peu le commentaire :) et pourquoi pas préciser aussi par exemple @madatlas pour suivre plus facilement :)
Vinber-Pro (2023-07-31 07:48:33+00:00): dans le cas que tu viens de faire, il manque le office=university, il n'y a que le nom, ce qui n'est pas suffisant :)
Brice Andrianarisoa (2023-07-31 09:02:30+00:00): Salut Vinber, 
Merci pour ton remarque, bien recu je vais en prendre en compte de tous ca.
Vinber-Pro (2023-07-31 09:07:37+00:00): je l'ai ajouté dans ce cas :)
Brice Andrianarisoa (2023-07-31 09:37:45+00:00): Merci,😊
Hoàng Tuấn Việt (2023-08-09 20:32:50+00:00): Bạn tìm hiểu thông tin trước khi thay đổi nhé! Theo nghị quyết số 27/2022/NQ-HĐND, phần Huyện Hoài Đức, thì đoạn đường từ cuối đường Dương Nội đến ngã 3 giao với đại lộ Thăng Long được đặt tên là Hoàng Tùng. Bạn xem chi tiết nghị quyết theo link dưới nhé!
https://thuvienphapluat.vn/van-ban/Xay-dung-Do-thi/Nghi-quyet-27-2022-NQ-HDND-dat-ten-dieu-chinh-do-dai-duong-pho-Ha-Noi-546857.aspx
eggie (2023-07-31 09:40:09+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
4004 (2023-08-06 22:06:59+00:00): тот же вопрос - на аншлаге раньше было 26 https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=266182948574676&focus=photo
NieWnen (2023-07-31 16:36:07+00:00): To dopiero jutro.
NieWnen (2023-07-31 16:37:57+00:00): No i linia 220 też do poprawy.
VictorIE (2024-05-17 13:56:21+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10985322273/history

man_made=street_cabinet -> man_made=sewer_vent ?
b-unicycling (2024-05-17 17:48:18+00:00): it is actually a street cabinet according to mapillary. No idea what I did there.
VictorIE (2024-05-17 18:33:18+00:00): :)
os-emmer (2023-11-05 16:39:50+00:00): Hi The Otter Guy,

thank you for joining OpenStreetmap and adding what I asume is your own company to our database. Your edits look quite promising but I think you made some small beginner-mistakes. I have some questions about your edits:

Questions about the footpath:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1193495714
-access="for passengers only": This is not a standard on OpenStreetMap. Values that should be used for access can be found here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access#List_of_possible_values. Who exactly is allowed to use this path? If the whole path is only allowed to be used by your customers, than access=customers would be fitting. Can you confirm this?
-On the satelite image it looks like a part of this path is on water. Is the imagery up to date or were there shortly some construstion works?

Question about the "Shelter":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1193501687
-What is the purpose of this building? You mapped it as building=retail. Is there a shop inside or is it just a place where passengers can wait for the next boat to arrive?

Question about the "Office":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1193501688
-Is this an office building? If yes, then building=office would probably better fit than building=industrial.

General questions about multiple objects:
-name="Otter Guy Dock & Drving Range", name="The Otter Guy Shelter" and name="Otter Guy Office": These names look suspicious. Are these names visible on the ground like on a sign or something? If yes, than this is totally fine. If there is nothing visible on the ground and this is just what you/your employees call the things, these names should not be mapped like this because then they are not objectivly verifiable by others.
-website=https://otterguy.com: You added it to the 2 buildings and to the comercial area. One information should only be in the database once. It would probably be the best to remove it from the buildings and keep it on the area. But besides this, the website https://otterguy.com is not working. Can you check what is going on there and maybe tell me the right website? Is it https://the-otter-guy.business.site/?
-What exactly is your business?
->Do you offer touristic round trips? If yes, is there a fixed route you use that could be mapped?
->Do you offer travels to other harbours/docks? If yes, to which ones? Maybe we can add the boat-paths in the water.

I hope I did not confuse you with all my questions. It looks like a wall of text but these are mainly just small things easy to fix, if fixing is even needed. If we help each other I am sure that we can improve the mapping of your business together :).
NorthCrab_upload (2023-07-31 08:20:16+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/834980815
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1193496671

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
seewäldler (2023-08-01 14:52:54+00:00): Hallo kukuk

Auf dem Stückchen Weg, zwischen den ways 24355767 und 285593926 ist seit dem Umbau der Friedrichstrasse explizit Fahrradfahren nicht mehr erlaubt. Radfahrer aus der Friedrichstrasse kommend in die Karlstrasse werden auf die Karlstrasse geführt, Radler aus der Karlstrasse kommend und nach links oder rechts abbiegend in die Friedrichstrasse ebenso. Schaust du dir das noch mal an?
kukuk (2023-08-01 15:07:08+00:00): "Radfahrer aus der Friedrichstrasse kommend in die Karlstrasse werden auf die Karlstrasse geführt"
Genau das ist das Problem und aktuell in den Daten nicht abgedeckt: die Wege sind nicht verbunden und Du hast Routing Inseln (die Welt ist halt flächig und nicht nur Striche). 
Versuche einfach mal, mit einer Routingsoftware den Bodenseeradweg mit einem Fahrrad abzufahren, es geht an dieser Stelle nicht mehr. Deswegen müssen Routinginseln weiter verbunden werden. In der Realität hast bei Flächen kein Problem, die grenzen aneinander und Du fährst einfach von einer auf die andere. Bei OSM mit Strichen brauchst Du dafür Hilfskonstrukte.
seewäldler (2023-08-01 15:35:19+00:00): Die Relation 13132 des Bodenseeradweges führt gar nicht über dieses Stück Weg sondern entlang der Karlstrasse/Friedrichstrasse und sollte von einer Routingsoftware korrekt abgefahren werden können. Ich habe die Wege jetzt etwas passender an die örtliche Ausschilderung geändert, so gibt es auch keine eventuellen Routinginseln oder Flächen die befahren werden müssten. Gerade hier finde ich aufgrund der aktuell sehr konfliktbeladenen Verkehrsführung für Radler ein 'mapping für den Router' sehr unglücklich.
user_5359 (2023-07-31 20:37:37+00:00): Hello! Please notice your typo: Please use fire_hydrant:street instead of fire_hydrant:stree.
eggie (2023-07-31 09:43:02+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback  source=BAG;local knowledge aangepast.
BAG data blijft nodig bij adressen.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-07-31 09:46:59+00:00): Normaal gesproken taggen we bij op de bestaande adresnode.
Daar kun je dan gewoon mee schuiven en met de bedrijfsinfo combineren.
Nu verschilt de postcode.. Kadasteradres hanteert 1334BN ?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-07-31 09:49:35+00:00): De info heb ik even samengevoegd en de postcode van de website gebruikt.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=139242031
MVG
eggie
aseidel (2023-08-02 09:36:52+00:00): Liebe:r asile111,
bitte bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/38531436 prüfen: ist der sidewalk rechts nur in oneway-Richtung für das Radfahren freigegeben? Bitte den oneway-Tag ergänzen.
Außerdem ist hier (soweit auf Ihren Mapillary-Fotos erkennbar) keine explizite Radinfrastruktur rechts oder links der Straße vorhanden, daher wäre cycleway:both=no korrekt (der freigegebene Fußweg ist keine explizit für den Radverkehr vorgesehene Infrastruktur, sondern nur eine Fußinfrastruktur, die vom Radverkehr mit genutzt werden darf). Bitte ebenfalls korrigieren!
Danke und herzliche Grüße
Antje Seidel
#lgmaps
adrianojbr (2023-08-01 18:18:40+00:00): Olá, KumtagDesert!

Sei que oneway=yes em junction=rondabout é redundante. Mas isso está gerando problema em algum lugar?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139242128
KumtagDesert (2023-08-02 09:13:06+00:00): Hello adrianojbr, As you pointed out, the oneway=yes tag was redundant, so I've removed it to adhere to the wiki guidelines (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction=roundabout). I do see that in specific cases the wiki says a oneway=yes tag can be added for clarity. Is this a junction where you think this should be clarified with a oneway=yes tag? Have a nice day.

Tradução automática: 
Olá adrianojbr, Como você apontou, a tag oneway=yes era redundante, então eu a removi para aderir às diretrizes do wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction=roundabout). Vejo que, em casos específicos, o wiki diz que uma tag oneway=yes pode ser adicionada para maior clareza. Esta é uma junção onde você acha que isso deve ser esclarecido com uma tag oneway=yes? Tenha um bom dia.
adrianojbr (2023-08-02 13:27:50+00:00): Respondendo sua pergunta: não, essa junção não precisa de esclarecimento e, portanto, oneway=yes pode ser removida.

Mas a minha pergunta não foi respondida: As etiquetas  oneway=yes e junction=rondabout em conjunto estão gerando problema em algum lugar?

Esclareço minha pergunta: há centenas de uso no Brasil (https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1yne). E 157.466 em todo o mundo (https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/junction=roundabout#combinations). Há intenção de corrigir todas elas? Ou, pelo menos, todas que sejam redundantes?

Eu acho que isso não atrapalha em nada, mas posso estar enganado.

Então, caso não esteja atrapalhando mesmo, acho que nosso tempo pode ser melhor empregado em resolver problemas reais no mapa.

Abraço!
KumtagDesert (2023-08-03 04:52:08+00:00): Hello adrianojbr. Thank you for responding. The reason that I removed the oneway was just to simplify modeling where a oneway tag was already being represented by the junction (it was not broken). I made this edit since I was reviewing the major junctions in this area and do not intend to do any systematic removal of oneway tags on roundabouts in Brazil or any other country. Our team strives to map as closely to established OSM wiki policy agreed to by the larger community. I will consider your mapping perspective while editing in the future though and do not intend to specifically remove more of these oneway tags, unless the junction needs other work. Have a nice day. 

[tradução automática]

Olá Adrianojbr. Obrigado por responder. O motivo pelo qual removi o unidirecional foi apenas para simplificar a modelagem onde uma tag unidirecional já estava sendo representada pela junção (não estava quebrada). Fiz esta edição porque estava revisando os principais cruzamentos nesta área e não pretendo fazer nenhuma remoção sistemática de etiquetas de mão única em rotatórias no Brasil ou em qualquer outro país. Nossa equipe se esforça para mapear o mais próximo possível da política wiki OSM estabelecida, acordada e estabelecida pela comunidade em geral. Vou considerar sua perspectiva de mapeamento durante a edição no futuro e não pretendo remover especificamente mais dessas tags unidirecionais, a menos que a junção precise de outro trabalho. Tenha um bom dia.
adrianojbr (2023-08-04 13:07:50+00:00): 👍
Kompass1 (2023-08-06 09:54:02+00:00): Ich finde operator=ADFC ist bei den beiden hier hinzugefügten Ausleihpunkten nicht richtig. Die Fahrräder werden nich vom ADFC ausgeliehen/gewartet/besessen/etc.

Die Fahrräder werden nur über das Portal des ADFC vermittelt. Bist du sicher, dass dieses Tagging richtig ist?
Dimacn (2023-08-01 14:23:14+00:00): Скажите почему офис юриста у вас оказался посреди кладбища?
Dimacn (2023-08-01 14:22:30+00:00): Здравствуйте. Скажите что это за автомойка посреди кладбища? Как называется?
nevw (2023-08-01 04:31:14+00:00): Hi, osmi has identified problems with the wetland multipolygon
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.79944&lat=-16.96466&zoom=13
I suggest you use the Josm editor for multipolygons
nevw (2023-08-02 12:08:35+00:00): I updated the multipolygon
Dimacn (2023-08-01 14:25:13+00:00): Здесь нет поблизости банков. Как называется банк?
pitfire (2023-07-31 10:45:35+00:00): Hallo TheSebik,

kleiner unverbindlicher Tipp zu Gehsteig als Fläche.
betr.: Fußweg #302139913
"warnings:mismatched_geometry:line_as_area"

Ich vermute mal es sollte " area:highway=footway" werden.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Gehsteig#C)_Gehsteig_als_Fl%C3%A4che
VG
eggie (2023-07-31 10:29:07+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
mini-me (2023-07-31 20:44:34+00:00): Адрес обычно указывают на здании. Не нужно дублировать его на точке.
Телефон должен быть в формате
+7 800 5506009
Noen (2023-07-31 10:48:31+00:00): Trelastveien i Nordre Follo kommune var fortsatt et anleggsområde når jeg syklet forbi foregående uke.
kesterlester (2025-02-08 18:42:21+00:00): This way is one of a large number of similarly tagged two-node ways (perhaps there are one hundred in number) each of which has the property that one node is PROVABLY in the drainage basin of the Rhine, while the other node is PROVABLY in the drainage basin of the Danube (Donau).  This means that each such way must be crossed at least once by the Rhine-Donau watershed.  This is to allow the (complementary) watershed data itself (something liike "Europa Wassershied" in German, though I've probably spelled that wrong) which currently has no error-bars associated with it -- and indeed is provably wrong in a few places based on the some of these links.
literan (2023-07-31 20:51:33+00:00): зря тратишь свое время. Я же сказал, что ты нарушаешь базовый принцип - мапишь под рендер неверным тегом. Все эти точки удалялись и будут удалены
Timmy_Tesseract (2023-08-01 05:24:34+00:00): Good day Оксана1818, why did you remove the designation tag on this road? 

Also please always mention which sources you use to make your edits (ground survey, local knowledge, imagery, database x, etc.) and please use better changeset comments (See: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments).