piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
riiga (2024-02-12 07:50:13+00:00): Why did you remove the correctly mapped surface tags from several objects? E.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/95007200

I can understand removing landuse and natural as the wiki says they're discouraged, but ideally those should also be converted to surface tags instead and not removed.
geozeisig (2024-02-12 11:10:56+00:00): Do you mean that I deleted landuse=grass from golf=green? It is simply superfluous at this point, and tagging for the renderer. I have also added the golf=pin to the data set.
geozeisig (2024-02-12 15:21:16+00:00): I have reverted the data set. You can improve it yourself or not.
eggie (2024-02-12 07:50:03+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-02-12 07:52:12+00:00): Tip  oneway=no hoef je niet toe te voegen aan wegen.
Dat is default.
We doen dat alleen als je 'bang' bent dat iemand oneway=yes gaat bijtaggen. Bv op een Tweerichting fietsrotonde.

MVG
eggie
tastrax (2024-02-14 08:59:10+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
RJOSM314 (2024-02-14 09:56:19+00:00): My apologies, thankyou for letting me know. I'll be more diligent and just double check any of my (very few) earlier ones.

Thanks again.
eggie (2024-02-12 07:54:35+00:00): Wegen in wijken worden getagd met highway=residential en soms als living_street (woonerf) 

Je het er nu toegangswegen van gemaakt (service) zoals naar een tankstation of parkeerterrein. Dat lijkt me niet correct.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-02-12 07:57:30+00:00): Dit is de meest recente foto van eind november.
Zal de wijk echt opgeleverd zijn en bewoond?
https://www.satellietdataportaal.nl/?base=openstreetmap&res=0.3%2C0.5&datemin=12-02-2023&loc=52.66150%2C5.067696%2C18z&overlay=mos-0&marker=loc&acqdate=2023-11-30&acqid=20231130_105624_PNEO-04_1_48&sensor=Pleiades-NEO

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-02-12 08:00:30+00:00): wegklasse teruggezet naar residential
10-NHN-DKraijer (2024-02-12 08:34:48+00:00): Hallo Eggie met de brandweer gisteren de bereikbaarheid etc gecontroleerd. De 1e 25 woningen zijn al 3 weken bewoond
eggie (2024-02-12 08:38:20+00:00): Oke..mooi.. . De wegen staan nu open.  Ik heb alleen de wegklasse weer aangepast naar het oorspronkelijke plan.

MVG
eggie
Przemysław Borys (2024-02-12 07:43:50+00:00): Zdjęcia tu:
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1npkY0tt-tIXfkIajH0pXZq-riJRU2m04?usp=drive_link
kwiatek_123 (2024-02-12 17:00:00+00:00): Dzięki za edycję!

Pierwszy raz spotykam się by ktoś wstawił zdjęcia jako uzasadnienie 
istnienia ładnego punktu widokowego :)
habi (2024-02-12 07:49:21+00:00): Und den Namen 'steep mtb-trail' habe ich auch entfernt :)
habi (2024-02-12 07:58:10+00:00): Sorry, but the change for https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2402208629 should not happened in the same changeset as for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/289701435/
habi (2024-02-12 07:58:27+00:00): Also source=http://qa.poole.ch/addresses/GWR/4451.osm.zip in addition.
woodpeck (2024-02-12 17:27:18+00:00): Hello 3la2_ka, in this changeset you have removed a buffer zone from OSM that has been in the database for over 4 years, i.e. long before the current conflict erupted. OpenStreetMap does not require nation states to "approve" edits; it is the community who needs to agree on things. I am reverting your deletion now because if something has been in OSM for four years and edited my multiple people, I assume that there is some truth to it. If you feel that this area should be deleted, please discuss this on community.openstreetmap.org and refer to the outcome of that discussion before you delete it again. -- Thank you, Frederik Ramm of OSMF Data Working Group, handling this as 
Ticket#2024021210000286
riiga (2024-02-12 10:18:31+00:00): Why do you keep removing valid tags on golf courses?
geozeisig (2024-02-12 11:08:11+00:00): Do you mean that I deleted landuse=grass from golf=green? It is simply superfluous at this point, and tagging for the renderer. I have also added the golf=pin to the data set.
riiga (2024-02-12 11:11:42+00:00): No, you keep removing surface=* which is valid to use and can be useful in the case of e.g. a fairway or bunker not being made from the expected surface (grass/sand).
geozeisig (2024-02-12 15:21:33+00:00): I have reverted the data set. You can improve it yourself or not.
pitscheplatsch (2024-02-12 09:53:54+00:00): Hi Amras05, welcome to OSM.

I guess something went wrong here. The latest map edits in this area looks like #vandalism.

Please see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=147355929#16/16.4434/80.6250

or https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=147355929

Can we undo your changes or those of others? Thanks.
Amras05 (2024-02-13 06:09:18+00:00): Those are the changes of other people now we are remapping this today by me and some voulenteers.
Thanks
julcnx (2024-02-12 08:53:09+00:00): FYI I downgraded new unclassified segment to residential as it is too narrow compared to nearby 2 lanes unclassified, and adjusted lanes and width tags accordingly for your reference.
woodpeck_repair (2024-02-16 11:44:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 147528659 where the changeset comment is: revert edits by user who believed to be editing a private map, DWG Ticket#2024021410000255
cats_pajamas (2024-02-17 00:05:59+00:00): Hello bernardo60, I noticed that you removed a large amount of short residential highways in this changeset. Reading your changeset comment, I see that you believe they were classified incorrectly and were adding clutter to the map. I do agree that they were not the correct classification, however, I think many of them provided valuable access to quite a few buildings.

For example, this way (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/724874007) was drivable per aerial imagery as well as ground-level imagery (entrance seen on the left here - https://kartaview.org/details/2304406/439/track-info) and provided access to a number of buildings.

How would you feel about adding these highways back in with the tags ‘highway=service’ and ’service=driveway’ rather than residential? I think that classification better fits the usage of these highways.

Looking forward to hearing back from you!
bernardo60 (2024-02-19 08:28:10+00:00): Hi there!
Good to get some feedback and I do appreciate your comments and would like to start a conversation with you. I am like you a geography nerd and always loved maps, printed or digital. I've been living in Bali for the last 12 years and get around a lot - mostly on my bicycle. This is where my local "intel" comes into play. The typical layout of a Balinese village is houses along only one through road. There might be no other streets. However, behind these road-facing houses are many more buildings which often are part of large family compounds comprising of several households. In the majority of cases, the units away from the main road can only be accessed on a path by foot or motorbike, the preferred means of transport for millions of Balinese. Based on ground surveys, I then update the tags from residential road to driveway or path or when they are too many and too short, I delete them, otherwise the map becomes very cluttered. Certainly public roads and ways of a certain importance should be shown. This might be hard to define, however. In your example, I am not sure whether the way was wide enough for four-wheeled vehicles. I agree with you to use the tag driveway, but you did not address the issue of cluttering the map. If you zoom into the village of your example, do you really feel that the access to all those buildings away from the main road should be somehow mapped? Looking forward to your perspective.
bernardo60 (2024-02-19 08:38:57+00:00): To give you an example what I mean with clutter, just look at w725759528 and all the "residential tags" in its vicinity.
cats_pajamas (2024-02-21 23:41:30+00:00): Thank you for the detailed response! I understand your thought that these short highways can clutter the map. My concern is that in deleting them, another OSM user’s work is being erased. Referencing the ‘Don’t delete objects that you don’t need or like’ section within the Good Practice page on the OSM Wiki it states ‘you should not remove something just because you do not need it’ (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice). 

We may not see a lot of value in adding these short highways, but since they do exist I think updating the tagging to a more appropriate highway type (whether that be highway=service or highway=path) is a better course of action than deleting the features entirely.
TrickyFoxy (2024-02-13 17:24:19+00:00): 👋 Что не так с тем что было?
Ольга Сергеевна Кондаурова (2024-02-14 02:43:21+00:00): переулка пролетарского сейчас нет. мы объединили дороги. теперь вся дорога от ул. советская до рек (паромной переправы) называется подъезд к паромной переправе
TrickyFoxy (2024-02-14 08:51:19+00:00): Принял, переименовал
kwiatek_123 (2024-02-13 16:48:45+00:00): Zapisuję na przyszłość.
Plany: https://pragapld.um.warszawa.pl/-/centrum_lokalne_kamionek_10-08-2022
JWB (Johann_Whistleblowing_Bot) (2024-02-12 17:09:27+00:00): Banned Johann detected!
Probabillity score: 98.2%
StVeit_Maps (2024-02-12 17:11:42+00:00): ?
Langlaeufer (2024-02-16 17:37:10+00:00): Hallo NPH,
ein einfaches access=no gilt für alles Nutzungsarten. Diese müssen dann nicht mehr einzeln aufgezählt werden. Motor_vehicle=forestry meint forstwirtschaftlicher Verkehr (im Sinne des Verkehrsrecht) frei. Ich nehme an hier darf nur ein bestimmter Forstbetrieb oder Personen mit Genehmigung fahren. Das gilt vermutlich genauso für andere Verkehrsarten (Fußgänger) Dann wäre wohl access=private (oder einfach no) passender.
Grüße Langläufer
Besucherlenkung_Nationalpark_Harz (2024-02-19 08:22:17+00:00): Hallo Langläufer,
vielen Dank für den Hinweis, dann werde ich das auf Access=no ändern.
Ich war mir nicht sicher und wollte nichts löschen :)
Gruß NPH
tastrax (2024-02-14 09:05:01+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
mikimapbuilder (2024-02-14 09:25:44+00:00): Thank you for this. Cheers
mueschel (2024-02-19 10:52:36+00:00): Hi,
please review these changes. Many of the tags have spelling mistakes, or are not used in any other area.

For example, there should be no spaces or capital letters

    access:free = no
    man_made = Borehole
    operational:status = Closed
    precision = 4.82
    pump = Manual
    waterway = Ground water
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-29 22:05:19+00:00): what precision=5.5 means at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11612976578/history ?

Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11612976575 actually active and usable at all? Or is it ruined remnant?

Have you surveyed this locations?
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-03 13:32:19+00:00): send PM with request to reply
kenzie123 (2024-03-08 19:01:05+00:00): Hello yes this points have already been surveyed and are what is on the ground
For the corrections we are working to correct them
kenzie123 (2024-03-08 19:04:56+00:00): Precision refers to the level of detail or granularity in geospatial data. It describes how closely individual data points or features represent real-world locations or phenomena
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-08 22:39:13+00:00): Note that I am not asking what "precision" means in context of maps.

I am asking what precision=5.5 tag means on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11612976578/history and why it was added
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-12 11:36:35+00:00): How tags for this objects were selected? Have you personally surveyed these objects?

If yes - what is the reason for uploading 209 in one go?

I am also asking again what precision=5.5 tag means on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11612976578/history and why it was added
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-03 04:05:33+00:00): I send PM titled "import/large edit with unclear tags"
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-03 10:04:42+00:00): Due to lack of replies and poor data quality (tagging is all over the place) I think this edit should be reverted.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-06-17 12:10:25+00:00): reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152800133
Lejun (2025-03-12 05:43:54+00:00): Je faisais le tour et suis tombé dessus ; il est pas documenté sur le wiki, d'où est-ce que tu tires le camera:features=webcam ? Simple copier-coller de nœuds ailleurs ?
Autopistero20502020 (2024-02-12 09:45:53+00:00): Hay 2 troncos, una central y otra lateral en ambos margenes. La central pertenece de la Junta de Andalucía, pero la lateral (vía de servicio) también lo pertenece de la Junta de Andalucía, donde le sigue la ruta de la A-316 dirección Torredonjimeno. Para que pueda ver mejor en el Wikimedia, se tiene que seguir la ruta:

-Dirección Torredonjimeno: sentido este-oeste (desde la A-44 hasta enlace de la carretera municipal de Jaén).
-Dirección Mancha Real: sentido oeste-este (desde la carretera municipal de Jaén hasta la A-44).

Por este motivo, en el enlace de la conexión al oeste de la autovía, por el norte de Jaén y al sur del parque empresarial de Nuevo Jaén, no tiene incorporación directa, por lo que tiene que incorporar desde antes de la A-44 (hay una barra de hormigón de separación que le prohíbe girar a la incorporación por seguridad vial)
bxl-forever_repair (2024-02-12 16:16:26+00:00): Reverted
söm4324 (2024-03-23 20:56:59+00:00): Hallo chris66,
zu dem Barfußpfad gibt es einen Hinweis mit gegensätzlichen Informationen. Kannst du bitte mal reinschauen und sagen, warum du den Barfußpfad in die Karte eingetragen hast? Danke!

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3374756
simo_explorer (2024-02-13 11:05:14+00:00): What's this?
please read the documentation:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tags
Bolt026 (2025-02-13 07:29:28+00:00): Hi grzegorz75jan,

I have a question related to this residential road: Robotnicza (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/45888733), where we provide wrong routes due to motorcar=no and taxi=no. Are these tags still applicable for the street? The residents complain that they struggle ordering at those addresses.
Could you please take a look?

Thank you in advance!
Catalina
grzegorz75jan (2025-02-13 08:24:34+00:00): I remember a little because I was there for a moment and even took photos and added the type of road surface in the StreetComplete application. That's why I didn't notice these tags. Later I forgot to make some edits in the JOSM editor (I was definitely planning to add a sidewalk near the Wątok stream then).

Looking through the history, I see that these tags were introduced at the end of 2009. I don't have the photos anymore, but I don't remember there being any prohibitions that would prevent transport companies or even bicycles from entering. I doubt there ever were. I'll try to call to get reliable information. If it's confirmed, I'll remove these tags.

The second option is that your drivers can take a few photos and provide you with information. The customer who ordered also probably knows where he lives and what the conditions are like there. I don't believe they didn't drive there. Even if they didn't drive into Robotnicza Street, they have direct knowledge of it.
Bolt026 (2025-02-13 08:35:28+00:00): Hey! Thank you so much for your prompt response! You are right, the drivers do enter that street. I asked the agents to request some photos from our customers but I did not get any updates yet. I will let you know as soon as I receive anything. Thank you!!
grzegorz75jan (2025-02-13 08:46:54+00:00): I made a phone call. This institution https://dpstarnow.diecezja.tarnow.pl/index.php/kontakt does not confirm any restrictions on this street. The only restriction is a weight of up to 3.5 tons. This means that passenger cars, delivery vans that do not exceed this weight can move there, and even more so bicycles.
Bolt026 (2025-02-13 09:34:43+00:00): Great! Thanks a ton! 
Then we can set the maxweight=3.5 tag and change to yes all these tags:
bicycle=no
goods=no
hgv=no
motorcar=no
psv=no
taxi=no
grzegorz75jan (2025-02-13 09:38:35+00:00): I'm working on it now. I'm editing it. I'm also fixing a few other objects.
grzegorz75jan (2025-02-13 10:24:47+00:00): Changes sent.
Bolt026 (2025-02-13 10:33:57+00:00): Thank you for all your effort!!
Happy mapping, grzegorz75jan!

Best regards,
Catalina
Nakaner (2024-11-07 13:08:32+00:00): Hallo,

in diesem Änderungssatz hast du Bahnsteige mit name="Bstg. 1" getaggt. Bitte verwende das name-Tag nur für Eigennamen. Für Gleisnummern gibt es die maschinenlesbaren Tags ref=* bzw. local_ref=*.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/199483876/history https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen#name_ist_nur_der_Name

Viele Grüße

Michael
joost schouppe (2025-02-16 16:38:07+00:00): Is de Vaartkaai (deels) gesloopt? In juli 2024 zag het er nog steeds uit alsof de weg wel bestaat maar gewoon afgesloten is: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=51.2404572&lng=4.4207218&z=19.9&dateFrom=2024-02-01&pKey=1194671051890807&focus=photo&x=0.4677058747188115&y=0.39460769770441206&zoom=0.34062927496580014
In dat geval kan je beter met access tags werken (verboden voor iedereen, of "private" om aan te duiden dat werfverkeer bijvoorbeeld wel kan). Als de weg deels hebouwd wordt, kan je er beter highway=construction van maken dan gewoon de highway tag verwijderen.
LantisOosterweel (2025-02-27 13:47:13+00:00): Vaartkaai is gesloopt tussen Viaduct van Merksem en Bredabaan voor de bouw van de boogbrug voor de Bypass.
Vaartkaat gaat op nog plekken op gebroken worden voor de aanleg van de verdiepte Ring. Op einde van de werken wordt de Vaartkaai heraangelegd. Dit zal vermoedelijk pas rond 2033 zijn
mavl (2024-11-13 08:50:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159081298 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible sources - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16857].
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-18 15:47:00+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11613040364/history - is https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dschool appropriate here?
eggie (2024-02-12 11:34:42+00:00): Dag Jan   
Je vraagt feedback
Wanneer dat hek op slot zit is het correct getagd. 

MVG
eggie
Nearby0051 (2024-02-12 16:22:39+00:00): Moin
Den Dorfteich hast du als Park eingetrage.
Wäre es vielleicht sinnvoller den Teich an sich umzubenennen und den Park als Fläche außenrum?

LG
pitscheplatsch (2024-02-12 14:21:53+00:00): Hi Ph MUE, willkommen bei OSM.

Danke für die ganzen Ergänzungen. Was war denn die Quellen von den Namen oder lokales Wissen? 

Viele Grüße
Ph MUE (2024-02-12 14:59:04+00:00): Hallo, vielen Dank!

Habe die Quellen bereits großteils aktualisiert- lokales Wissen und Erhebungen vor Ort.

Schöne Grüße!
eggie (2024-02-12 10:58:25+00:00): Dag hoeboe   De weg staat nog op slot met motor_vehicle:conditional=no @ 2023 Oct 30-2023 Dec 1  ?

Wanneer je het aantal lanes aanpast naar 2 klopt dat niet meer met lanes:forward=2

Dat zal toch niet het geval zijn. 

Kijk je nog even en kan die conditional er af?



MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-02-12 11:03:23+00:00): Ik heb de routering hersteld. Soms hebben kleine aanpassing grote gevolgen. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-02-12 11:10:39+00:00): turn:lanes heb ik ook even verwijderd. Dat zal na reconstructie anders zijn
eggie (2024-02-12 11:32:36+00:00): Veste S Prins   Is het adres hier Drift 27?

MVG
eggie
S Prins (2024-02-12 12:41:53+00:00): Ja, dit klopt. Het betreft een locatie in het aaneengesloten pand van Universiteitsbibliotheek Binnenstad.
Bear-in-a-box (2024-12-09 11:00:40+00:00): There are no traffic signs that would disallow bikes. please consider reverting your incorrect modifications.
Bear-in-a-box (2025-12-17 11:15:32+00:00): no answer, no proof that there are "autoweg" signs or signs that would disallow bikes. From my own experience, there are none. So i reverted.
puchaczowsky (2024-02-27 22:44:25+00:00): klasyfikacja dróg w OSM nie jest kopią klasyfikacji urzędowej
Moammar Dylan (2024-04-01 09:13:17+00:00): #Mapathon_Ubakrie #Kelas_GIS_2024_UBakrie
ygcgjp5 (2024-05-14 07:47:22+00:00): Kodėl panaikinti fixme apie ortofoto nebuvimą ten, kur vis dar nėra atnaujintos ortofoto?
ygcgjp5 (2024-05-25 14:43:11+00:00): Nesulaukus atsakymo pakeitimas atšauktas
Marek-M (2024-02-12 16:56:49+00:00): Cześć, dzięki za dane o hydrantach.

Zwykle hydranty nie posiadają nazw dlatego te, które Ty nazwałeś pozwoliłem sobie poprawić i ich nazwy (name) przerzuciłem do klucza opis (description)
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=147375841
Marek-M (2024-02-12 16:58:18+00:00): Ponadto nadawanie nazw opisujących ich lokalizację jest zupełnie niepotrzebne, bo hydranty w OSM mają współrzędne, które określają ich położenie w terenie.
Ekoprzedsiębiorstwo (2024-02-13 06:43:02+00:00): OK Dzięki za uwagi.
Tym bardziej, że sukcesywnie chcę uzupełniać mapę hydrantow na terenie  Gminy Mielno.
Dla wygody przekazywania informacji o lokalizacji hydrantów dla postronnych obserwatoró, użyłem nazwy. Może to być również opis więc zastosuję taką metodę.
Marek-M (2024-02-13 07:15:53+00:00): Jeżeli jest plan na przekazywanie informacji o lokalizacji np. hydrantów, to polecam rozważyć wykorzystania danych z OSM na innych mapach, bo tzw. OSM carto czyli https://osm.org wyświetla tylko renderowane obiekty i hydrantów tam nie widać.

Różne mapy z hydrantami są już dostępne w sieci np. https://mapa.abakus.net.pl/ albo można też stworzyć własną mapę, która będzie pobierała dane z OSM - np. takie rozwiązanie przygotowane na szybko: https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/pl/map/gmina-mielno_1023425
aharvey (2025-02-19 10:19:55+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1249459181

man_made=water_works is "a facility where water is treated to make it suitable for human consumption before being sent to the water network." per the wiki.

However the building is labeled "SPS", which is per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sydney_Water a Sewage Pumping Station. A water_works (water treatment plant) would be WT.

I've since added this detail to the building at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1249459180 so I'll just leave the landuse but remove water_works.
❤️‍🔥 (2025-02-21 09:23:52+00:00): got it, thanks for fixing this
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-31 06:30:16+00:00): this edit seems empty and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147348529 you claimed it is a revert edit

it is a bit confusing

I also see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147364003
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-23 10:26:24+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11613239498/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
AkshatPal (2024-02-12 12:13:15+00:00): Hey , Please also contribute here 26.1055,80.3546 , I know you are working for ola maps 👍, please do contribute here any nearby cities as these are big villages and some have Ola exp centre but very less OSM data
literan (2024-02-12 17:21:09+00:00): еще раз, почитайте, пожалуйста, какой принято использовать формат ввода адреса:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%90%D0%B4%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%B0#%D0%9D%D1%83%D0%BC%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%B2

здесь исправлю
sirorezka (2024-02-12 19:37:47+00:00): Прошу прощения. Мне показалось, что было в нужном формате.

Может бота написать, чтобы. такие штуки править?
literan (2024-02-12 20:16:20+00:00): напишите, если умеете )

я далек от ИТ-сферы