piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SekeRob (2025-04-04 09:15:31+00:00): Ciao,

Ho fatto alcune modifiche al tuo tagging su una strada rurale.

access=private > vehicle=private secondo segnale
aggiunto cancello
nome secondo segnale angolare
tipo di superficie

Quando cambi l'accesso a una strada, devi verificare tutte le strade che si collegano a quella strada se non hanno un'uscita secondaria, altrimenti crei quelle che si chiamano isole di traffico isolate. In questo caso c'erano 5 strade dipendenti da quella strada, quindi le ho taggate anch'esse come private.

Tutte le modifiche le troverai in questo set di modifiche.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164497855#map=17/42.719248/13.925572

Se aggiungi l'estensione Better-osm-org al tuo browser web, puoi vedere molto facilmente quali parti sono state modificate in un set di modifiche. Visita https://github.com/deevroman/better-osm-org per dettagli.

Saluti
Gregory Peony (2025-07-27 03:45:23+00:00): When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom in so that you can see the outline of the building and mark the corners carefully. Exclude shadows and yards when tracing the footprint.  Keep in mind that you are looking at the roofs of buildings, but mapping their footprints. Depending on how the scene is lit, pitched roofs may have light and dark sections that belong to one building. Generally pitched roofs overhang the walls of a building, so a footprint slightly smaller than the roof is accurate. You can scale selected features in ID with shift+(-/+), or JOSM with ctrl.+alt+Lclick & drag.  Take care to make contributions that others can build upon. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164407294
Gregory Peony (2025-04-11 20:25:17+00:00): The footprints you added here are inaccurate and some envelope multiple buildings. I recommend watching the common beginer mapping mistakes videos on the missing maps youtube channel. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164407390
Gregory Peony (2025-04-11 21:10:35+00:00): Most footprintd here outline buildings visible in imagery but they are not accurate. I recommend watching the common beginer mapper mistakes videos on the missing maps youtube chanel.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164407463
luschi (2025-05-31 22:04:10+00:00): Hallo,
mir ist aufgefallen dass du in dieser Änderung sehr viele Hydranten importiert hast. Leider sind jetzt etliche doppelt eingetragen.
Auch stellt sich mir die Frage ob bei diesem recht umfangreichen Import(welcher eigentlich mit der Italienischen oder Südtiroler Comunity abgesprochen und dokumentiert werden müsste) nicht die Urheberrechte von wasserkarte.info verletzt werden.

Anhand der oben genannten Punkte, möchte ich dich bitten, die von dir erstellten Duplikate zu entfernen.     
Auch würde es mich freuen wenn du bezüglich Urheberrechtsverletztung in den nächsten Tagen eine Erklärung abgeben könntest.

LG      
luschi
Fritz_92 (2025-06-01 09:03:44+00:00): Hallo,

vielen Dank für deinen Hinweis. Du hast völlig recht – der Import war ein Fehler meinerseits. Ich habe inzwischen eine E-Mail an die Data Working Group (DWG) geschrieben und um einen vollständigen Revert des Changesets #164407467 gebeten, da die Daten aus wasserkarte.info stammen und ich nach erneuter Prüfung von einem möglichen Lizenzverstoß ausgehen muss.

Ich entschuldige mich aufrichtig für die Unannehmlichkeiten, die durch die doppelten Einträge und den unkoordinierten Import entstanden sind. Es war keineswegs meine Absicht, gegen die OSM-Richtlinien oder Urheberrechte zu verstoßen.

Beste Grüße
Fritz_92
luschi (2025-06-01 09:36:59+00:00): Danke für deine schnelle Antwort.     
Wünsche dir weiterhin viel Spaß beim ergänzen der Daten hier auf OSM.

LG
luschi
Supaplex (2025-06-01 14:50:20+00:00): Hi

This is Dennis Raylin Chen from the Data Working Group. I revert the changeset

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167054160
flohoff (2025-04-02 09:43:37+00:00): Moin
ich habe hier deinen Changeset gesehen - Super das du mit machst.

Du hast hier die Ladestation (Also den Node) in den Weg des Parkplatzes - also das Outline integriert - das ist sehr unglücklich.

Die Ladesäule steht ja auf dem Parkplatz - also sollte auch innerhalb liegen. 

Ich vermute das war nur ein versehen deshalb sage ich es.

So Wild objekte miteinander zu verbinden ist eher nicht so cool wenn man da irgendwann mal was korrigieren umbauen will.

So long - And keep Mapping.

Flo
NeisReview (2025-04-03 05:10:19+00:00): #NodeDragging

Hello, and welcome to OSM.

Thank you for contributing to the map. I’ve reviewed your recent edits and noticed that at least one node of a way was moved. This can sometimes happen unintentionally, and it’s led to some unusual intersections or overlaps between street segments and other map elements.

Could you kindly confirm whether these changes were intentional or if they may have been made by mistake?

Thank you, and I look forward to your response!
---
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12092453621
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1305625634
NeisReview (2025-04-02 17:26:53+00:00): #DeletionsCheck

Hi, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed many of your changes in this set involve deletions.

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.
HellMap (2025-04-02 18:25:30+00:00): It seems that this solar park is still in the planning phase and nothing is built yet. The original author added these [1] without a clear source. I reverted these and set them with life-cycle prefix as planned for now pending clarifications.

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154870022
karlisdreimanis (2025-04-03 06:00:31+00:00): Hello. I can confirm that the deletions were intentional. I represent the company who s data was published with a reference to the company s name, without having received company s permission. The original author who published the information had no right to publish such information, as he works for local municipality and might be involved in the project evaluation once it is prepared and submitted. The project is not complete and the data is no publicly available, yet. Changes my still apply to the project.
HellMap (2025-04-03 10:14:47+00:00): Thanks for clarifying. It sounds like there are issues concerning source licensing and conflict of interest, so I will remove the current points.

Hopefully, we can readd them from publicly available/published sources when and if possible.
KNaing (2025-09-02 04:26:54+00:00): Thanks for your collaboration. Please make sure to draw your buildings as accurately as possible and don't forget to square the building, select them and type 'Q'
TinPetreković (2025-04-02 08:26:20+00:00): Accidental node edit #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164408588
monhiko (2025-04-02 08:17:22+00:00): 我还没画完呢，你先别急着改啊 T _ T
monhiko (2025-04-02 08:18:30+00:00): 然后河道画的精度太粗了
user_22184950 (2025-04-02 09:43:04+00:00): 一个月过去了，汽车导航数据更新，导致无法导航到南方的乡村地区，需要解决汽车导航问题……河道跟汽车导航关系不大，你可以自己继续深化或者删掉……
monhiko (2025-04-02 09:48:41+00:00): 啊、原来你要负责解决的是汽车导航问题啊。。。知道了
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-07 18:43:57+00:00): wycofane jako nieprzedyskutowany import, po zignorowaniu https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164065893 i https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
eggie (2025-04-02 08:44:43+00:00): Prima zo.. 
Lijkt me oke als het gras is. 
Gr eggie
Frans S (2025-04-13 10:22:34+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please don't connect nodes of buildings to each other.
Use the Ctr key when you map buildings close to each other.
And, square each building when it is still selected with the Q key.
Try to map more accurate over the rooflines and don't include the shadows.
Best regards and keep mapping
scramhorn (2025-04-13 11:28:46+00:00): What is your rationale behind not connecting contiguous buildings? Is this a list of your own personal suggestions or a best practice?
Frans S (2025-04-15 07:22:37+00:00): Hi, from the imagery we cannot see if buildings have shared sidewalls. So, when it is not clear that buildings are terraced (1 roof over the whole length)
we ought to map buildings as a single building, freestanding.
Most buildings are rather square.  A building with correct squared buildings is difficult to map, so each rectangular building need to be squared with the Q key while selected. (we are still waiting till it is possible to map a building with squared corners in 1 go in IdEditor, like in JOSM , another much used editor,)
You will find these agreements in the mapping guidelines. (best practice)
Here you find a video how to map buildings.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U4Mfpnvp6Y8&list=PLb9506_-6FMHULD9iDUAh-4qpxKdVspnD&index=14

Best regards
NeisBot (2025-04-02 08:30:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2025-04-06 18:20:43+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/164604158
NeisReview (2025-04-02 17:29:07+00:00): #UnexplainedChanges #Test

Hello, welcome to OSM.

Could you please clarify the purpose behind your map changes? It's not entirely clear from the edited data and your added description. Also, what was used as a source of your activity?

Looking forward to your response. 
Thank you.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-07 18:43:07+00:00): wycofane jako nieprzedyskutowany import, po zignorowaniu https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164065893
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-07 18:42:50+00:00): wycofane jako nieprzedyskutowany import, po zignorowaniu https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164065893
Lezurex (2025-04-02 14:04:16+00:00): Ein weiteres Detail, dass du beim street side parking noch hinzufügen könntest, wenn du möchtest, wäre die Orientation zur Strasse: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:orientation
nleanba (2025-04-02 20:52:58+00:00): Hab ich jetzt gemacht :)

(einzige unsicherheit: bei denen weiter westlich hat es jeweils zwei nebeneinander paralell zur strasse, ich habe das mal als parallel angegeben obwohl man da kein parallell-parking beherrschen muss)
Lezurex (2025-04-03 06:14:36+00:00): Hmm, ja, das ist jetzt halt ein Spezialfall, wüsste da jetzt gerade auch nichts Besseres. Würde ich mal so lassen.
silversurfer83 (2025-04-02 21:17:38+00:00): Hi :)

zwei Sachen:

- Die beiden neuen Fußwege, die du durch das Ärztehaus gezeichnet hast sind doch sicher nicht *über* dem Gebäude, oder? Sieh dir mal den Zufahrtsweg zwischen den Wegen an, wie der gemappt wurde. Das ist ein gutes Beispiel, wie du die Wege anpassen solltest.

- Die "Mülltonnen" nahe der Magdalenenstr.: Sind das private Tonnen? Dann bitte wieder entfernen. Danke.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164410192
eggie (2025-04-02 09:54:13+00:00): Hoi  Lijkt me oke..
Voor wie is die kaartautomaat? Dan zou permit niet oke zijn als het ook bedoeld is voor algemeen gebruik. 
Maar wellicht staat er 'alleen vergunninghouders en dan is het oke.
gr eggie
Foodking (2025-04-02 10:07:43+00:00): Die kaartautomaat is voor de overige parkeerplaatsen waar niet een bord "alleen vergunninghouders" staat. En tevens voor de 2 parkeersplaatsen waar ook opgeladen kan worden. Die vallen sinds enkele weken buiten de parkeervergunningzone.
eggie (2025-04-02 10:22:55+00:00): Oke...  Lijkt me correct dan.
zarl (2025-04-07 14:22:34+00:00): Könntest du deine Hans-Wurstiade bitte wieder reverten? Das war noch nicht mal zeitlich genau zum 1. April...
marczoutendijk (2025-04-07 18:10:05+00:00): Reverted by: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164647088

  
Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
yrtimiD (2025-04-04 00:23:37+00:00): the address you added is already exists on the map since oct 2023. In general all addresses in Tel-Aviv are imported from open municipality data, so it's better to not add new addresses specifically in Tel-Aviv
OmerMadlan (2025-04-21 09:15:38+00:00): תודה על ההבהרה.
הנקודה נוספה לבקשת גולש של אתר מדלן שככל הנראה לא הבחין בין רחוב "שור" לבין רחוב "פרופ שור".
מתנצלים על העריכה השגויה.
martinst (2026-04-18 17:29:00+00:00): Ich habe die fehlenden access-Tags auf den Wegen in Changeset 181509100 ergänzt.
rempshaener (2025-04-02 18:18:10+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.
Du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.

Das Schema für Trafos findest du hier https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:power=substation?uselang=de#Beispiele
Danach wäre die Ergänzung von
man_made=street_cabinet
utility=power
substation=minor_distribution
noch sinnvoll.

Noch ein kleiner Tipp: wenn du das Objekt rechtwinklig machen möchtest, kannst du es markieren und „Q“ drücken.

Vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag und weiterhin viel Spaß beim Mappen.
Viele Grüße
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-07 18:42:41+00:00): wycofane jako nieprzedyskutowany import, po zignorowaniu https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164065893
UT93 (2025-04-03 21:27:00+00:00): Grüsse
Meinst nicht, dass es angebracht wäre, ein wenig präzisere Änderungssatzkommentare nieder zu schreiben?
Elizen (2025-04-09 10:27:40+00:00): Здравствуйте.
Подскажите, пожалуйста, откуда была взята информация об этом квартале: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1374088334#map=16/51.81002/107.59598
Elizen (2025-04-09 10:29:01+00:00): Подскажите, пожалуйста, откуда была взята информация об этом квартале:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1374089381
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-18 02:05:15+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165093515
Hufkratzer (2025-04-02 19:49:04+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1374090540 is not a horse riding centre, it is a horse riding arena and iD has a different preset for these arenas which sets the tags leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian, example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/741821696
Ydnaback (2025-04-04 10:44:02+00:00): Hi, Thanks for letting me know. I have amended - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164501723
Jakuje (2025-04-02 15:31:48+00:00): To by bylo lepsi cele revertnout. Ten 164380721 nedela nic uzitecneho. A snazit se to opravit tak nejak zhruba jako se podarilo zde komplikuje reverty.
V https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164427092 jsem opravil do puvodniho stavu.
ivanbranco (2025-04-02 10:58:34+00:00): Ciao Djuseppazzo,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1374092820/history

come mai access=private? Non c'é nessun cancello e/o cartello di proprietà privata
Djuseppazzo (2025-04-03 10:55:49+00:00): Devo fare un sopralluogo, mi pareva di ricordare un cartello di proprietà privata. Entro 1 settimana dovrei riuscire e passare e verificare. 
Grazie
ivanbranco (2025-04-03 11:25:17+00:00): Non è necessario, sono passato io ieri e prima ancora a Dicembre e posso confermartelo. In generale sarebbe meglio prima effettuare il sopralluogo e poi modificare.

grazie della risposta e buon mapping
Djuseppazzo (2025-04-03 11:27:10+00:00): Ok grazie per il chiarimento
Buona giornata
Snusmumriken (2025-04-03 06:22:27+00:00): Hej

En kommentar gällande det här tillägget; i Stockholm strävar vi efter att adresserna är unika, dvs. att varje adress återfinns bara en gång i OSMs databas och vi använder en relation för att tilldela en adress till en POI
MrBlondeBlonde (2025-04-03 08:12:15+00:00): Okay
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-07 18:42:32+00:00): wycofane jako nieprzedyskutowany import, po zignorowaniu https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164065893
silversurfer83 (2025-04-02 20:46:43+00:00): Hi :)

hier zwei hilfreiche Artikel in unserem Wiki für deine Arbeit:

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:emergency%3Dfire_hydrant

bei Fragen immer raus damit

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164413108
silversurfer83 (2025-04-02 20:47:49+00:00): Ah, sorry,

folgendes noch:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

Danke :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164413108
Langlaeufer (2025-04-02 16:43:24+00:00): Warum footway mit bicycle=designated? das gibt es nicht! Entweder Gehweg (footway) oder Mehrzweckweg (path)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164413340
Black_Diamond (2025-05-24 07:37:07+00:00): This building no longer exists. It was demolished a while ago. Please see the Mapillary pictures for more recent imagery. I recommend reverting this change.
Black_Diamond (2025-05-24 07:43:57+00:00): The Santa Clara County Orthoimagery (Winter 2024) is more current too. This building isn’t there either.
aliaksei_boldyrau (2025-05-26 07:26:35+00:00): Hello! 
Indeed, The Santa Clara County Orthoimagery (Winter 2024) seems more recent than Bing Maps Aerial. Mapilary images also prove that you're right and there's no building. Thanks for noticing it. I'm going to revert this change. Have a nice day!
nevw (2025-04-03 21:55:13+00:00): Hi, multipolygon relations cannot share sides.
These are the ones affected
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=144.83004&lat=-37.86905&zoom=18
You can see examples of how multipolygons are constructed here
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon
I suggest just using simple polygons instead of the multipolygons
nevw (2025-04-04 22:27:45+00:00): Thanks for fixing
mavl (2025-05-13 15:07:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
flohoff (2025-04-02 11:50:24+00:00): Moin,
ich habe gerade deinen Changeset gesehen. Du hast hier 2 Kerbs eingetragen. 

Die existieren aber gar nicht. Das ist ja nur ein Belagwechsel. Guck mal auf Mapillary da gibts Bilder. Da ist nur Asphaltiert und der Taxistand ist Gepflastert. Aber eine Stufe gibts da nicht.

Flo
VRS-Auskunft (2025-04-04 12:52:34+00:00): Hallo Flo,
danke für den Hinweis. Das war eine Fehlinterpretation des Luftbildes NRW da hier da die Queerung neu eingezeichnet ist. Mapillary und Streetview haben den Stand 21/22.
NeisReview (2025-04-02 17:29:13+00:00): #UnexplainedChanges #Test

Hello, welcome to OSM.

Could you please clarify the purpose behind your map changes? It's not entirely clear from the edited data and your added description. Also, what was used as a source of your activity?

Looking forward to your response. 
Thank you.
NeisReview (2025-04-02 17:29:24+00:00): #UnexplainedChanges #Test

Hello, welcome to OSM.

Could you please clarify the purpose behind your map changes? It's not entirely clear from the edited data and your added description. Also, what was used as a source of your activity?

Looking forward to your response. 
Thank you.
realjep (2025-11-26 00:02:41+00:00): Se non è uno skatepark (per skateboard), la pista di pattinaggio andrebbe taggata come sport:roller_skating

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Droller_skating
Davide M87 (2025-11-26 08:23:34+00:00): ok, cambio il tag
Op'tRad (2025-12-08 07:59:32+00:00): Goedendag mijnheer Olieslagers,
In de vorige wijzigingenset had ik de naam van de CLUB aan de adresnode getagd, maar ik vond geen naam van het VELD op hun website. Net als bij veel sportclubs: de naam van de club aan de node en de naam van het sportveld aan leisure sportscentre. Vandaag vond ik alsnog de naam op Wikipedia: Vliegveld Salland. Groet, Werner
donovaly (2025-04-26 00:14:52+00:00): Many thanks for your additions.

However, you draw footpaths through houses. Also, simple sidewalks like in that case are not drawn in as footpath to not clutter the map. Please use instead of a path for the road the tag "sidewalk".
HostedDinner (2025-05-03 18:58:39+00:00): Hi,
ich hab gesehen, du hast hier die Schwimmbäder in Kaiserslautern alle eingetragen.
Dieser waren alle bereits als Fläche vorhanden. Ich habe die doppelten Nodes wieder gelöscht:
Siehe für die bereits vorhandenen Flächen:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30751595

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24930323

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/97869514

Als Fläche sind diese wesentlich genauer und bereits seit Jahren eingetragen.
NeisReview (2025-04-02 17:29:32+00:00): #UnexplainedChanges #Test

Hello, welcome to OSM.

Could you please clarify the purpose behind your map changes? It's not entirely clear from the edited data and your added description. Also, what was used as a source of your activity?

Looking forward to your response. 
Thank you.
Taya_S (2025-04-02 16:11:09+00:00): I have restored these water towers. Please do not delete objects that are actually present on the ground.
See related: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164428731
reigi (2025-04-02 17:13:09+00:00): Hallo lennan, prüf mal bitte anhand des OSM-Wikis https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:access%3Dprivate ob das wirklich ein "Privatweg" ist.
Lennan (2025-04-02 17:57:57+00:00): Das ist nichtmal ein Weg, sondern die gepflasterte Fläche vor zwei offen Garagen, die sich gegenüberliegen. Privat ist das auf jeden Fall.
Sollte man dann nicht eher den Weg rausnehmen?
reigi (2025-04-02 18:42:26+00:00): Den Weg habe ich ja selbst angelegt. ich kann mich aber nicht daran erinnern wie er aussah. Wenn das so ist wie du schreibst, sollten wir zuerst mal dein tagging lassen wie es ist.
Lennan (2025-04-02 18:54:28+00:00): Mittlerweile stehen da halt zwei Mehrfamilienhäuser die ihre Verkehrsfläche da haben. Aber man kann auch nicht wirklich von der Christian-Küppers-Straße auf die andere wechseln.
reigi (2025-04-02 19:12:13+00:00): Dann wäre vielleicht nicht highway=path, sondern eher highway=service https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dservice
Lennan (2025-04-02 19:20:10+00:00): Ok ändere ich nachher dann auch entsprechend.
fortera_au (2025-04-02 21:45:26+00:00): Hi, the guard rail tag should be placed on a separate way where the guard rail is located, not on the road way it is alongside.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164414758
fortera_au (2025-04-02 21:43:16+00:00): Hi there, the name for the bridge section should remain as Gorge Road. If 3768 is just a reference number, you can put it in bridge:ref, otherwise, I'd put it in bridge:name if it's the name of the bridge.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164414840
ti-lo (2025-05-12 15:30:15+00:00): There's a description for "balloon tagging", why do you "invent" another one ? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:aeroway#Balloons
NeisBot (2025-04-02 11:00:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment
NeisReview (2025-04-06 18:16:49+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/164604036