piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Robert46798 (2024-04-02 19:25:02+00:00): Hallo lollipop,

Vielen Dank für deine Aktualisierung!
Ich habe mir deinen Änderungssatz angeschaut, weil du die entsprechdne Option beim hochladen angegeben hast.

Damit deine Änderung "wirksam" wird, musst du noch die alten Tags von dem Punkt entfernen. Jetzt steht disused:shop=* neben shop=*. Das Erste sollte aber das Letzte ersetzen. Sonst werden die ganzen Auswerter den Unterschied nicht merken :-)
Alle Informationen zum shop können dann noch entfernt werden und alles was unabhängig von der Nutzung ist (die Adresse z. B.) kann bleiben.

Viele Grüße,
Robert
NorthCrab_upload (2024-04-02 18:20:45+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11781004403
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11781004404

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
G_P_J (2024-04-03 00:45:23+00:00): Poprawione.
JunosL (2024-04-02 18:20:45+00:00): There is no neighbourhood called London in Ljubljana. Unfortunately, this error propagated even into official sources such as https://zemljevid.ljubljana.si/web/profile.aspx?id=Javni%40LJ_MZ&initialExtent=464024.83%2C99044.55%2C0.26458

https://urbinfo.ljubljana.si/web/profile.aspx?id=Urbinfo%40Ljubljana&initialExtent=464036.77%2C99031.6%2C0.26458

To make matters worse, as opposed to OSM, these sources rendered this name on a hill.

There is indeed a building planned with the name of Vila blok LONDON S10 Ljubljana Rudnik as can be seen here: https://shglobal.si/london/
But as far as I understand, this could only be tagged as a "name=" value for the building tag.
Gazer75 (2024-04-23 20:20:15+00:00): Hei og velkomen til OSM. Riksvegar vil ha "tunk" som vegtype. Du kan lese meir på https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Norway/Highways
Complicated Studios (2024-04-02 19:33:00+00:00): Wedding Film Studio
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-13 03:58:07+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164878528
OSMGuy2000 (2024-09-03 20:09:26+00:00): Yo, Lukas. Which data did you use? On my map most of the ships have moved. Some of them are civil, as well.
emersonveenstra (2024-04-03 12:01:24+00:00): Hi there,

Why did you delete this road? https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/16940970
Alan Bragg (2024-04-03 13:49:41+00:00): My mistake. Confused by boundary being same as road. Corrected. Thanks for pointing out the error.
emersonveenstra (2024-04-02 20:15:21+00:00): Hi there,

Thanks for your edits, however https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17418394 is not a valid bicycle route relation, since it does not have a defined start and end point
chrisrohn (2024-04-03 02:08:48+00:00): You seem to be speaking of a trail network; a Bike Route is where a municipality designates roads or paths well suited for bicycle traffic.
emersonveenstra (2024-04-03 11:47:31+00:00): OSM doesn't have that distinction though, all route relations are expected to be a "customary or regular line of passage or travel" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:route).
jumbanho (2024-04-03 13:58:31+00:00): I would recommend adding cycleway=shared_lane for these streets if they are signed as designated for bicycles (without bike lanes) and add the correct speed limit (maxspeed=X) as this would be more useful for bike routing.
OSM_RogerWilco (2024-04-03 19:28:22+00:00): Hallo xrefz,

"Verbesserungen" ist wenig hilfreich/aussagekräftig. Vielleicht magst Du beim nächsten Mal einen besseren Kommentar verwenden.

Schau mal hier: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

Viele Grüße
Roger Wilco
xrefz (2024-05-21 16:50:50+00:00): Ok
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-06 05:45:18+00:00): Hello!

Note that you do not need to add description of feature type as a name.
For example when mapping tree it is enough to specify that it is a tree, no need for putting that name of this specific tree is "Tree".

So for buildings it is not needed to put house as their name.

Or do you maybe know that this specific object mapped at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1268452229 is specifically named with such name?

And if it was mistake - can you edit map to remove this name?
    
Do not worry too much about this issue - I made way worse mistakes when I was starting. Maybe some tool or explanation is confusing? Why you added this name? Note that I am asking as maybe something can be fixed to be less confusing.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-03 10:00:58+00:00): Thanks for fixup of this ancient edit!

Hopefully this kind of comment like I made there are welcome/useful, please let me know if they are not
Classe SNT Raess (2024-04-04 08:22:30+00:00): Cool
citrula (2024-04-09 19:57:42+00:00): I removed barrier=gate from the road way - it should only go on the node where the gate is actually present
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149495848
NorthCrab_upload (2024-04-02 19:20:20+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11781129412

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
MacLondon (2024-04-03 00:32:56+00:00): I've added another guidepost  (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11781794485) to the Green Link Walk (approx location). I've seen another map show the route going the park at Clapton Square, but this guidepost would indicate that it doesn't.

I've walked it via the park and it's very much not step-free at either side of the park. The route is billed as being step-free, so I'd be very confident that it doesn't go through the park but passes the guidepost instead.

(Not step-free to cross the road at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1078872732 either, but that does seem to be the signed route).
spiregrain (2024-04-03 13:42:14+00:00): I missed that new guidepost - thanks for adding it.  Strongly indicates that the route goes around - not through - this park.   I'll correct this area this evening.
spiregrain (2024-04-03 19:36:08+00:00): Done!
MacLondon (2024-04-03 00:40:17+00:00): Not sure whether you'd map route discs on bollards as guideposts... but I did spot one just south (I think) of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11079475792.
spiregrain (2024-04-03 13:43:17+00:00): I've included the minor 'discs', but not the flappy papery ones (which I think are temporary).   I'll add this one, this evening.
aTarom (2024-05-07 16:30:33+00:00): Hola, puedes revisar esto
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1268467093/history
más de 1 kilómetro de recorrido enrollado en tan poco espacio no es habitual
y esto
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1268465908/history
entre otros similares
no hay imágenes a pie de calle usables en OSM que me permitan verificar si es o no real, puedes ayudarme por favor?
Saludos
JLZIMMERMANN (2024-07-23 08:19:33+00:00): concernant le Rue Joffre, il y a l'impasse joffre (axe N-S) et la rue Joffre axe E-O. Cel aest visible en regardant sur le Géoportail https://www.geoportail.gouv.fr/carte?c=4.818897579141304,43.93942761721732&z=18&l0=COMMUNES.PRIORITYDISCTRICT::GEOPORTAIL:OGC:WMTS(0.6;h)&l1=LANDUSE.AGRICULTURE2022::GEOPORTAIL:OGC:WMTS(1;h)&l2=PRAIRIES.SENSIBLES.BCAE::GEOPORTAIL:OGC:WMTS(1;h)&l3=GEOGRAPHICALGRIDSYSTEMS.PLANIGNV2::GEOPORTAIL:OGC:WMTS(1)&l4=HYDROGRAPHY.BCAE.2024::GEOPORTAIL:OGC:WMTS(1;h)&permalink=yes
chrizy (2024-08-05 07:10:56+00:00): Merci pour la mise à jour de ces deux relations. Je viens d'intégrer les adresses associées avec Pifomètre, il y aura peut-être des doublons à supprimer.
JLZIMMERMANN (2024-08-05 08:50:32+00:00): Merci.
A priori il y a un 58 et 58bis de l'avenue de la trillade qui ont été intégrés sur le rue Joffre.
chrizy (2024-08-06 08:45:37+00:00): Je ne sais pas comment vérifier cela sans aller voir sur place sur laquelle des deux rues se trouvent les boîtes aux lettres correspondantes.
streckenkundler (2024-04-02 19:58:44+00:00): Ich wollte mir es gerade anschauen... Hach... dann lass ich die Finger davon...

Danke... :)

Sven
Tatfahren (2024-04-02 20:19:16+00:00): Hier gibs wohl auch noch einen Spielplatz, den ich aber aufgrund der durch mich nicht möglichen Prüfung des Namens "Lachplatz" nicht bearbeiten wollte.:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4179265
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-03 19:47:04+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11781224862/history has cycleway = yes that was added in this edit
what kind of cycleway? there is a big difference between cycleway=track and cycleway=separate and cycleway=shared_lane
MxxCon (2024-04-03 04:56:00+00:00): Hello.
Please remember to connect intersecting crosswalks, otherwise that creates incomplete navigation routing map.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149497861
kengaroo5445 (2024-04-20 01:57:26+00:00): Noted with Thanks
literan (2024-04-03 17:25:09+00:00): только не надо тип объекта включать в название. У них на сайте указано, что они называются Maximum Vinyl
исправлю

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#%D0%98%D0%BC%D1%8F_%E2%80%93_%D1%8D%D1%82%D0%BE_%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%B8_%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%BA%D0%BE
literan (2024-04-04 17:35:38+00:00): do you speak Russian?

please do not include shop type into name tag.
Ionut Paduretu (2024-04-03 08:45:38+00:00): Fake motorway, please delete it or I will demand a revert
JeroenHoek (2024-04-04 11:54:15+00:00): De adresgegevens staan er al in een losse node. Ze zijn hier niet op het pand nodig.
IknowJoseph (2024-04-11 09:54:13+00:00): Hi, are you saying that you're taking map information from Google? That's not allowed.

The route may be long if this border crossing is closed, but apparently it's closed: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algeria%E2%80%93Morocco_border

Please revert your changes.
IknowJoseph (2024-04-11 09:55:33+00:00): Actually, don't worry, I've just seen that you're a new user, so I'll just make the change for you.
Metzor (2024-04-03 08:30:16+00:00): Hallo Wüstenfuchsl!

Das Qualitätssicherungstool brouter suspects [1] hat mich auf deine Änderung an diesem Knoten aufmerksam gemacht:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5133133708#map=17/48.14121/8.42890&layers=N

Alles was ich auf mapillary sehe, ist ein Stoppschild. Ich glaube kaum, dass auf einer Landstraße nur landwirtschaftlicher Verkehr freigegeben ist... ;-)

Jedenfalls funktioniert das Routing gerade nicht mehr [2].

Reparierst du das bitte wieder?

Herzlichen Dank und fröhliches Mappen
Metzor

1 - https://brouter.de/brouter/suspects/daily/Germany/BadenWrttemberg/new/809294331171823304

2 - https://brouter.de/brouter-web/#map=18/48.14150/8.42880/standard&lonlats=8.429148,48.141299;8.428643,48.141914&profile=car-eco
tekim (2024-04-03 00:21:20+00:00): Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap!  It is great to have you as part of our community.  Thanks for your edit to the map.  I see you have cited Google Maps as one of your sources.  Unfortunately, we are not allowed to use Google Maps when editing OpenStreetMap due to Google's terms of use.
tekim (2024-04-03 00:21:49+00:00): Reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149502333
Enock4seth (2024-04-04 22:58:49+00:00): Hi,
Thanks for mapping. Kindly stop adding several machine generated roads that lead nowhere to OpenStreetMap, it doesn't help.
TheSwavu (2024-04-03 04:34:54+00:00): Hi,

If you are doing comments in opening_hours would you please use U+0022 as the delimiter. Other versions, such as U+201D and U+201C, are not valid under the spec https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours/specification.

This may be an issue with Go Map!!, but I haven't used it and I don't know what the workflow is for adding opening hours. If the app chooses the style of quote to use, then we might need to post a bug.

Thanks.
arctic-rocinante (2024-04-03 06:35:37+00:00): Thanks for catching that! I typed the raw tag value with my iPhone keyboard, so my fault rather than GoMap’s. I’ll be more careful with this sort of thing going forward 👍
Leo Slager (2024-04-03 10:19:15+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Leo Slager (2024-04-03 10:24:14+00:00): Dag Botterhuren,

Hier is wel het een en ander fout gegaan.
Aan de N-zijde van de Havendijk heb je ongemerkt schade aangericht door de wegen te verschuiven.
Door het schuiven met de kaart in de edit-modus heb je ook het adres  Wouter van Damstraat 1 verplaatst naar het midden van de haven.

Ik ga de schade even herstellen.
Leo Slager (2024-04-03 10:33:24+00:00): Verder heb ik amenity=boat_rental toegevoegd zodat er ook een symboll op de kaart zal verschijnen.
Nakaner (2025-07-10 14:19:18+00:00): Hallo,

du hast in diesem Änderungssatz Fahrtanzeiger in Rastatt erfasst. Zwar zeigen diese ihr Signal in beide Richtungen an, jedoch sind sie dennoch richtungsgebunden. In Fahrtrichtung ist es eine nach rechts oben steigender weiße Linie, entgegen der Fahrtrichtung fallen die Punkte/die Linie nach rechts unten.

Im Fall von https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11781566347/history habe ich es vorhin korrigiert, weil ich diesen gestern Abend fotografiert habe. Ich möchte dich bitten, das bei den anderen Fahrtanzeigern ebenfalls zu ändern.

Viele Grüße

Michael
der neue (2025-07-11 12:19:42+00:00): Hallo Michael, 
danke für den Hinweis, ich habs entsprechend korrigiert.

Viele Grüße
Manfred
felipeeugenio (2024-04-03 11:23:42+00:00): Hola. El tag coastine es para mar, no para lagos. (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Coastline)

Saludos
mtmail (2024-05-04 17:49:08+00:00): Can you review the postcode of this place? I think it's this business https://ratings.food.gov.uk/business/774466 (All data is from Food Hygiene Ratings Scheme Data is released under the Open Government Licence (v3) so afaik it's usable for OSM).
⇄ john paul jones & gringo (2024-05-05 09:34:19+00:00): I've corrected the post code.
I'm not sure how that happened, '<different>' happens in JOSM when more than one item is selected and they have different values. It is not normally inserted. 
Thank you for bringing this to my attention.
Ewrt1 (2024-04-07 19:16:59+00:00): This is not the actual name
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149501903
user_21280234 (2024-04-07 19:20:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted in full through https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149706829.
Xvtn (2024-04-04 14:54:42+00:00): Howdy! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes. Looks great overall! The only suggestion I have is to avoid abbreviations in OSM. ("W" -> "West") That's because it's easy for computers to shorten words when necessary, but it can be harder to expand them when the longer form is more appropriate. Also, the house number part of an address should generally only contain the number. The first directional prefix should be part of the street. (Example: house number 1234; street East 100 North)

Let me know if you have any questions, and thanks for your contributions!!
Jake Adams (2024-04-04 15:43:32+00:00): Thanks for looking it over, I'll use those addressing conventions moving forward.
nona mostafa (2024-04-04 08:32:48+00:00): Hello Badr_Bni;
Please be aware when mapping streets, because you added overlapped streets
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/1268511664
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/1268511336
and floating roads
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/1268511543
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/1268511961
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/1268511762
I fixed These on this changeset:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149552920
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149553444
please use validation data before the upload
You can also check these issues via OSM Inspector:
Example:
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-7.96710&lat=32.22136&zoom=17&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.47&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas%2Cislands%2Cislands_car%2Cislands_bicycle%2Cislands_all%2Csnap_points%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1%2Cunconnected_open_ends_2%2Cunconnected_open_ends_3%2Cunconnected_open_ends_4%2Cunconnected_open_ends_5%2Cunconnected_open_ends_6
Regards
nona mostafa
N1T3R (2024-04-05 01:12:52+00:00): For a huge changeset, can you split it into multiple uploads in the future?

Changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Have a look at: "Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering.
gimin24 (2024-04-07 14:48:19+00:00): Sorry, this big changeset was unintended, I fully agree with your points and will be more careful in the future when moving on to map different areas.
JJIglesias (2024-04-03 17:09:40+00:00): Saludos. el Camino Tupumasa-Chupiomonas, No es una Via Fundamental ni parte de la F16, es un camino Terciario No Pavimentado de conexión entre dos poblaciones menores.
 
Ya realice los cambios respectivos. Gracias por tus ediciones.
nevw (2024-04-03 01:07:21+00:00): Hi, why have you chosen not to follow the house outline when mapping this?The usual method is to draw an accurate representation of the house outline using satellite imagery.
nevw (2024-04-03 03:06:38+00:00): fixed, please check
MxxCon (2024-04-03 05:05:26+00:00): I'm not sure if this whole thing should be tagged as a crossing island since you can cross it in only 3 places...
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149502814
IraGersh (2024-04-03 12:08:26+00:00): I removed the crossing tags and there were no complaints from iD.

I was following guidance from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dtraffic_island

Previously there were warnings and suggestions which included traffic_calming and I felt this had nothing to do with traffic calming.
MxxCon (2024-04-03 05:09:58+00:00): I fixed it up by properly splitting crosswalks
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149502960
IraGersh (2024-04-03 11:56:45+00:00): Thanks.  Will check it out.
Revnoplex (2024-04-05 06:02:23+00:00): For some reason, the Initial changeset info was lost. But the description was:
"Updated Progress of State 3 Duplication of Princes Highway around Kilmary"
NeisBot (2024-04-13 23:34:03+00:00): Hello huskminer, thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.Please see https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 

Thanks!

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
arctic-rocinante (2024-06-05 09:31:48+00:00): Hello, can I ask what the “Maint” attraction you added here is? It’s a bit unclear at the moment.
felipeeugenio (2024-04-03 11:21:06+00:00): Hola Juan Manuel
Es dificil creer que cada arroyo termine en una vertiende de agua potable. Cuál es la fuente de esto? o es un error por una importación automatizada?
saludos
Juan Manuel Stagnaro (2024-04-03 14:20:02+00:00): Hola Felipe,

Ambos errores fueron producto de una importación automatizada, gracias por destacarlos, me encargaré de ellos.

¡Saludos!
felipeeugenio (2024-04-03 14:27:04+00:00): Buena, gracias
felipeeugenio (2024-04-04 11:56:20+00:00): Hola, A lo mejor no me expresé bien. Me refería no solo al agua potable, si no que a las vertientes mismas.
Cada arroyo intermitente coienza en una vertiente (spring)?
Eso no puede estar bien. Como que da la idea de que estás haciendo un trabajo para tus estudios y necesitas que se vea así?
Tu sabes más de Geografía que yo, pero de lo que conozco los bosques del sur, no hay una vertiente cada 50 metros.

saludos
Juan Manuel Stagnaro (2024-04-04 16:15:20+00:00): Hola Felipe,

Efectivamente se trata de un error en el etiquetado de los datos producto de la importación de los datos. En realidad cada etiqueta "spring" hace referencia a una vertiente, sea subterranea o no (entendiendo la vertiente como naciente de un arroyo). 

Actualmente no existe una etiqueta con esas características, por ello el error más allá de que existen un gran conjunto de "manantiales" (traducción de la etiqueta "spring" al español en la wiki). Aún no lo he corregido por estar ocupado en otras tareas más urgentes pero desde hoy me ocuparé de ello.

Agradezco tu atención y revisión al tema. ¡Saludos!
ChromeLotus (2024-04-12 21:15:41+00:00): Hello GrabID_martinmbaihaqi, thank you for your contributions to OSM! I see you modified the highway=construction tags for segments of the Cimanggis–Cibitung motorway network. It is to my understanding that construction on the toll roads is still on-going and access to and from them remains limited. If that is true, then these modifications may be premature (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dconstruction). Do you have resources that suggest the toll roads are fully open to the public or an opening date? If there is an opening date, I would recommend applying tags, such as check_date=* and opening_date=*, detailing the progression of the construction project instead of modifying highway=construction tags. I look forward to hearing back from you!
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-18 15:31:02+00:00): Thank you for mapping. The mapping looks great and also the changeset comment. The buildings are really great. Happy Mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149504547
mueschel (2024-04-07 10:52:42+00:00): Hi,
you added the tag "Post ID" here. This is not used in other places. Could you explain what it means?
Xvtn (2024-04-03 22:31:57+00:00): Hi! Your addition here has major problems with its tags. If you are the business owner, welcome to OSM! Please reply here or message me and we can get it fixed! If you are a marketing company creating accounts on behalf of clients, please review your process and learn more about OSM's tagging schema before making more edits. There's nothing wrong with adding businesses, but the way you're doing it is not helpful to anyone. (And likely does not improve SEO ranking.) For now, I've reverted your edit.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149546009
Mashin (2024-04-04 15:12:37+00:00): Looks all good to me. Thanks!
MxxCon (2024-04-03 05:13:00+00:00): Southampton Apartments building is already tagged
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149505371
CurlingMan13 (2024-04-04 00:13:16+00:00): Corrected.

I somehow missed it already being tagged.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149505371
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-03 04:29:17+00:00): see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144595373
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2024-04-03 04:31:05+00:00): 当我今天试图执行

```overpassql
[out:xml][timeout:255];{{geocodeArea:China}}->.searchArea;relation["boundary"="administration"](area.searchArea);(._;>;); out meta;
```

的时候

我只得到了这一个关系

好的，原来果然是boundary=administrative

以后记住了！（并且会把这个倒霉的tag列入长期观察）
Hans Thompson (2024-04-03 18:32:59+00:00): good catch! thank you for your edit.
Xvtn (2024-04-03 22:27:14+00:00): Howdy! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes here. Looks great! Thanks for your contributions.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-04-04 21:34:45+00:00): Hey Xvtn This changeset left disconnected roads. Please don't review good before checking why the changeset left warning for disconnected roads or impossible oneways.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-04-04 21:37:39+00:00): This changeset also incorrectly split the address interpolation way which breaks addresses.