piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2024-04-21 09:34:06+00:00): Hello robibrojek, thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.Please see https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 

Thanks!

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
Barroszt (2024-06-26 22:01:49+00:00): Proszę usuwać punkty bez tagów! Już posprzątane. Dziękujemy za edycje w mieście Toruń i zapraszamy do dalszych edycji w grodzie Mikołaja Kopernika!
aTarom (2024-04-09 06:46:55+00:00): Hola, gracias por editar, el tag
ref:INEGI
en
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9285712745/history
está en uso pero en México, al estar ocupado ya el ref:ine, no sé como corregirlo.
Saludos
maraf24 (2024-04-09 17:03:48+00:00): Od wielu miesięcy manipulujesz nazwami we Wrocławiu. Który już raz zmieniasz nazwy mostów? Za każdym razem stosujesz inne kryteria. OSM to nie jest zabawka.
Tu jest forum https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/pl/40
Następnym razem zanim zaczniesz coś zmieniać przedyskutuj to tam.
Ilość dziwnych zmian w tym zestawie jest tak duża, że nawet nie chce mi się ich wypunktowywać. Wystarczy most Olimpijski.
pavvv (2024-04-09 17:11:25+00:00): Nazwa Mostu Olimpijskiego jest z terytu, co w tym takiego dziwnego?
maraf24 (2024-04-09 18:46:51+00:00): Wszystko. Na nazwy z terytu jest tag teryt:name.
Nie wiem na jakiej podstawie uważasz, że nazwa z teryt ma być w name. Gdzie tak ustalono?
pavvv (2024-04-09 18:53:53+00:00): Traktuję to jako oficjalną nazwę. W uchwale nadającej nazwę nie ma pisowni słowa MOST i nazwa nie występuje w terenie.
maraf24 (2024-04-09 19:10:56+00:00): Oficjalna nazwa jest w uchwale.
pavvv (2024-04-09 19:30:43+00:00): Okej, nie zauważyłem załącznika.
Jednak nie wszystkie nazwy są w uchwałach. Czy wtedy pisownia powinna być z TERYTu czy zgodnie z wiki?
maraf24 (2024-04-09 20:26:15+00:00): Nazwy w TERYT powinny mieć odpowiadające uchwały, ale może być do nich trudno dotrzeć, nie wszystkie zostały zeskanowane.
Z TERYT się zwyczajowo korzysta przy nazwach ulic, bo dotarcie do uchwał w całej Polsce jest zbyt czasochłonne, a i TERYT jest pod tym względem dość bezbłędny (ale zdarzają się w nim błędy).
Przy nazwach innych obiektów (mosty,parki,wyspy) korzystałbym ze źródeł lokalnych, a najlepiej z tego, co jest w terenie.

Z innej strony: skoro wiadome jest, że Wrocław przeprowadza zmianę nazw w terenie na wersję pisaną małą literą, to w przypadku braku widocznej nazwy w terenie wystarcza to do użycia takiej formy. Stąd poprzednie wersje ("most"), które wprowadziłeś we Wrocławiu zostawiłem. 
Z tego co widziałem dla maro21 też jest to ok. Po co więc zmieniać na wersję TERYT, które ma to zapisane dużymi literami?

Dodatkowo zmieniłeś z błędami, np. Most Pokoju zarówno w teryt jak i w terenie ma "Most", a zmieniłeś na "most".
pavvv (2024-04-10 07:29:44+00:00): Po odkryciu, że TERYT zawiera poprawne nazwy rond myślałem, że tak jest też dla innych nazw dróg. Powinienem był się upewnić.

Z tym Mostem Pokoju wiedziałem, że jest odwrotnie niż z mostem Grunwaldzkim, ale zawiodła mnie pamięć i pomyliłem wersje.
maraf24 (2024-04-10 14:07:05+00:00): W TERYT jest taka kategoria ulicy jak "rondo" (jest też skwer,park,bulwar). Ale wygląda na to, że nie ma kategorii "most". Wrzucają więc mosty do kategorii "inne". W efekcie mamy pisownię "Most", gdyż wszystko poza kategorią jest traktowane tam jako nazwa własna. I muszą dodać słowo "most" w nazwie, bo inaczej nie będzie wiadomo, że to most.
Wygląda mi to na ograniczenie techniczne.
maraf24 (2024-04-10 14:18:41+00:00): A jednak w TERYT występują mosty pisane małą literą, np. "inne;most Grunwaldzki". Czyli przypadek mostu Olimpijskiego to błąd osoby wpisującej.
pavvv (2024-04-10 14:21:24+00:00): W kategorii "rondo", gdzie (zakładam, że) nazwa z uchwały jest pisana dużą literą, są wpisane nazwy "rondo Rondo Ronalda Reagana", "rondo Rondo Rotmistrza Witolda Pileckiego", itp.
Możliwe, że z mostami uznali to za nazwę własną.
maraf24 (2024-04-10 15:33:32+00:00): "rondo Rondo X" zwykle oznacza, że "rondo" jest częścią nazwy własnej i powinno być dużą. 
We Wrocławiu dawniej wszystkie ronda tak miały, potem zaczęli uchwalać bardziej poprawnie "rondo X".
Analogicznie jest ze skwerami.
Miasto chyba nie zamierza urzędowo uregulować pisowni i wprowadzić zmian w TERYT.
CurlingMan13 (2024-04-09 03:39:33+00:00): Do not partially overlap areas.
aceman444 (2025-02-12 18:24:43+00:00): Zdravim, to viete zase z Ortofoto, ze ktory je to Urban...
Khidistavi (2024-04-15 17:15:48+00:00): Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150049841
Dodko (2024-04-09 13:09:08+00:00): Zvieratá sa neznačia ako samostatná zoo, opravil som.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:attraction%3Danimal
Robert Whittaker (2024-04-13 11:57:22+00:00): I see you've tagged https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11803317484 with office=newspaper. This would be the tagging for a newspaper company's office. Is this right here?

If it's actually a newsagent shop, then shop=newsagent would be better. In the note at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1910268 it's suggested the shop may also be a post office, in which case it could also be tagged with amenity=post_office.
mueschel (2024-04-14 08:41:00+00:00): Hi,
could you explain the different "cat4" for toll charges you added here? It would be very helpful if we could express that using the default vehicle categories and conditional tags.
Langlaeufer (2024-04-09 14:43:12+00:00): Die Straße hat (einen) separat erfassten Fußweg. Die Antwort in SC muss also "separat" heißen und nicht "nein - kein Fußweg) 
Grüße
Langläufer
Langlaeufer (2024-04-09 14:45:54+00:00): Die Straße hat sogar zwei Fußwege, einen separaten und einen nicht gezeichnetne, somit ist "no" um so mehr falsch.
Langlaeufer (2024-04-09 14:53:28+00:00): Ich habe es korrigiert. Bitte mal in SC die Daten neu laden und schauen ob es mit der Realität übereinstimmt.
Langlaeufer (2024-04-09 14:56:14+00:00): Es geht um die  Hiddestorfer Str. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/67657710
CurlingMan13 (2024-04-09 03:42:38+00:00): Again,

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#:~:text=Wrapping%20polygon%20areas%20around%20a%20hole%20and%20leaving%20a%20tiny%20open%20gap.%20Use%20multipolygons%20instead.
CurlingMan13 (2024-04-09 03:39:11+00:00): Do not wrap areas around themselves to simulate "holes".  Multipolygon relations should be used instead.
CurlingMan13 (2024-04-09 03:38:34+00:00): Do not delete features just to re-add them...
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149753972
Metzor (2024-04-09 17:29:03+00:00): Hallo ospsmand,

Die Einbahnstraße reicht vermutlich nicht so weit oder?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/159387060#map=17/48.20496/8.76859&layers=N

Ich vermute, diese betrifft nur das kurze Anschlussstück?

Viele Grüße
Metzor
Metzor (2024-04-13 06:29:05+00:00): Hallo ospsmand,

Ich habe es nun repariert, damit das Routing wieder funktioniert:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149937006

Bitte um irgendeine Reaktion, damit ich weiß, dass Änderungssatzkommentare prinzipiell bei dir ankommen :-)

Schöne Grüße
Metzor
ospsmand (2024-05-04 11:36:57+00:00): Hallo Metzor,

die Änderungssatzbenachrichtigung  hat mich verspätet erreicht.
Danke für das Korrigieren des Abschnitts.

Schöne Grüße
ospsmand
Metzor (2024-05-04 14:01:30+00:00): Gern. Und Danke fürs Bescheidgeben!
NeisBot (2024-04-09 12:34:03+00:00): Hello xXJvlivsXx, thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.Please see https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 

Thanks!

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
CurlingMan13 (2024-04-09 03:40:37+00:00): Please review this webpage prior to making further edits, otherwise your work may be at risk for being reverted.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#:~:text=Wrapping%20polygon%20areas%20around%20a%20hole%20and%20leaving%20a%20tiny%20open%20gap.%20Use%20multipolygons%20instead.
joel56dt (2024-04-08 22:52:59+00:00): Oh I am incorrect. I will revert this...
joel56dt (2024-04-08 22:54:38+00:00): Need to check my eyes. Just going to change the lane counts and restriction tags
MxxCon (2024-04-09 04:32:01+00:00): Bus stop number quest is not about what bus route, but individual bus stop number. MTA bus stops numbers are 6 digits long. You can find them on the rectangular boxes hanging on each bus stops' poles, or on https://bustime.mta.info/
The bus route goes into route_ref= tag.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149755202
Coplact (2024-05-01 01:58:26+00:00): Thanks for the feedback. I was able to update to correct route number and even add the route_ref tags to missing stops.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149755202
VictorIE (2024-04-10 11:43:50+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/80228779/history

How come the road is marked access=private?
NickMillerUK (2024-04-10 13:16:07+00:00): Hi Victor, thats a good spot. I was tagging driveways as private and somehow managed to tag the street. I have fixed the issue.

That's a very good spot, I would not have noticed that for several weeks until I returned to that area again.

I will double-check going forward to make sure I don't make any mistakes like that again.

Thanks
Nick
VictorIE (2024-04-10 13:57:54+00:00): If you look here: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-6.21632&lat=54.10826&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.77&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas%2Cislands%2Cislands_car%2Cislands_bicycle%2Cislands_all%2Csnap_points%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1%2Cunconnected_open_ends_2%2Cunconnected_open_ends_3%2Cunconnected_open_ends_4%2Cunconnected_open_ends_5%2Cunconnected_open_ends_6%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas%2Cislands%2Cislands_car%2Cislands_bicycle%2Cislands_all%2Csnap_points%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1%2Cunconnected_open_ends_2%2Cunconnected_open_ends_3%2Cunconnected_open_ends_4%2Cunconnected_open_ends_5%2Cunconnected_open_ends_6 you can see that many of the side roads are marked green. :)
NickMillerUK (2024-04-11 14:16:16+00:00): Thank you for sharing this, its extremely useful tool and I had not seen that before. I will certainly be using this to find and fix issues going forwards.

Thaks
Nick
CurlingMan13 (2024-04-09 03:35:47+00:00): When adding buildings, be sure to press "Q" to square them and give them right angles.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149755545
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2024-04-12 02:42:54+00:00): 像 WAY: 1225478497 这样的河流如果在地图上依然看得出痕迹，是不建议删掉的。OSM遵循的是实地求是原则，即以地表为准。虽然看上去现在似乎确实有修马路整平地块（要卖地是吧），但河道的痕迹并未消失。（至少从卫星图看是这样，不过如果卫星图已经过时而您在当地看到了更新的情况，欢迎指正我！）
考虑到您可能刚来对各种规则有误会啥的，我先恢复了这几条河道痕迹，如果有不太合适的请您务必告诉我！感谢！
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149756213
Mxdanger (2024-06-15 08:08:33+00:00): Would it be better to keep this building but use the lifecycle prefix for the tags?

You can still clearly see the base of the building even on foot. At least until this area gets developed a few decades later it can be deleted properly.
MalloccoGIS (2024-06-21 13:39:34+00:00): I make edits based on the physical structure not the foundation in comparison to its counterpart which is still intact. The foundation is all that is left and the aerial on open street is not updated regularly. The site is contaminated with asbestos and other toxic chemicals, that said no development activity will occur in the foreseeable future.
TuAmigoElEditor (2024-04-09 03:15:22+00:00): Hola, Las manzanas se mapean con la etiqueta "place=city_block". La etiqueta "building=yes" se usa para casas o edificaciones.
Saludos.
weblogdryads (2026-05-17 00:11:18+00:00): Hi! What is United Talent Agency? It is unusual to have so many duplicate POI on the map. Thanks
rskedgell (2024-08-16 07:01:33+00:00): Should the grass running track at Bushey Meads School be tagged with access=private?
LordGarySugar (2024-08-19 13:54:35+00:00): It is private, but is not tagged as such as I have never seen access tagging on leisure=track before
rskedgell (2024-08-19 16:20:50+00:00): It's a lot less common than on leisure=pitch or leisure=swimming_pool, but I think it's likely to be useful for data consumers searching for sport facilities.
b0ssi (2024-04-09 02:18:52+00:00): Hi all, I have moved the definition of the Charles Darwin Walk onto this relation containing all segments to have a single source of definition. I'm assuming this is the cleanest way to do it but would like to confirm.

With this change in place I would also suggest to delete the other way that runs on top of it (Grand Cliff Top Walk has a separate set of ways) and replace it with a relation that refers to the ways the Charles Darwin Walk uses as well so that the physical path segments have a single representation. Thoughts?
CurlingMan13 (2024-04-09 03:34:58+00:00): Do not partially overlap areas.  Please review this webpage before making further edits:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#:~:text=the%20building%20itself.-,Common%20mapping%20pitfalls,-Adding%20name%3D*
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149757038
muralito (2024-04-13 13:32:13+00:00): Para estas cosas es mejor aca https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenHistoricalMap
nevw (2024-04-09 02:40:29+00:00): Hi, the srvice road should begin from Mount Street and continue through the carpark
BR_pebble (2024-07-18 07:39:11+00:00): Hello NICKS FF
Thank you for mapping!
I have added missing buildings -1.4557618, -48.480814;
-1.4561466, -48.4808093;
-1.4561353, -48.4808045;
Please inspect your task carefully before closing.
Happy Mapping!
drlellinger (2024-04-09 17:12:32+00:00): Gebäude unter Denkmalschutz werden nicht benamst.
Oder heißt das Gebäude explizit so?
drlellinger (2024-04-09 17:13:59+00:00): Was soll das für eine Bushaltestelle sein?
arjunaraoc (2024-04-09 15:52:15+00:00): Hi, Wikidata and English wikipedia article refer to a village, which requires place attribute. Can you explain why you dropped the place attribute  in this changeset.  You can create separate land use multi polygon without wikipedia, wikidata attributes
jhaluska80 (2025-01-27 04:04:17+00:00): I stumbled upon your sidewalk while looking at a nearby note and I have to say I love the level of detail and care.  It's so nice to see somebody put so much effort into something as mundane as a residential sidewalk.  Keep up the good work.
5m4u9 (2024-04-10 03:23:24+00:00): hola, la idea de la línea de los árboles era mapear los árboles plantados por la alcaldía de forma general, dado que no es muy sencillo saber dónde están exactamente cada árbol.

La idea sería reemplazar esta línea por cada árbol como punto (nodo). Hasta mientras queda bien la fila. revertí este cambio.
Viajero Perdido (2024-04-09 19:01:55+00:00): Hi ContraBand.

Are you sure this circular-ish area is actually not part of the park?  If it's merely a restricted-access area, then it's still part of the park, and should be mapped differently, eg access tag.  (I mapped the park originally from the AB gov't shapefile; there was no such exclusion at the time.)

Also, when creating a relation such as here, tags need to be removed from the outer way and copied to the relation.  You've left them in place on the outer way, but here the whole relation seems unnecessary.  Cheers.
Viajero Perdido (2024-04-09 19:07:02+00:00): PS, may I suggest
name=Ram Falls
full_name=Ram Falls Provincial Campground
?
The latter two words could be considered noise, and can be (Provincial) or are (Campground) covered by other tags.
habi (2024-04-11 01:16:19+00:00): Merke: Tippe nie Changeset-Kommentare im Bus, das kommt nicht gut. Das "Gebäude" ist abgerissen, nicht das "G HH enöude"
phoenixsaigon1698 (2024-04-09 08:07:20+00:00): Hi bạn,

Khi bạn edit một biển báo cấm rẽ, giúp giùm mình kiểm tra tính logic đầu tiên là ở hình dạng trước với nhé.

https://imgur.com/a/oRaxDqX

Ở version 1 của bạn. Đây chưa nên là cấu trúc của một biển cấm quay đầu. 

Mình sẽ sửa, dù sao cũng cám ơn sự đóng góp của bạn.
phoenixsaigon1698 (2024-04-09 08:31:18+00:00): https://imgur.com/a/gvCYu24
Bạn có thể check lại hình dạng mới ( turn restriction geometry) của biển báo này. Hiện tại mình check view tháng 12/2023 cũng chưa thấy có biển cấm quay đầu nên mình sẽ để cấm quay đầu cho oto còn xe máy vẫn quay đầu bình thường. Nếu bạn có hình streetview từ KartaView hãy upload lên imgur để xác thực thêm 1 lần nữa nhé
Viajero Perdido (2024-04-09 19:09:35+00:00): Hi.  Don't forget that newly-added water areas should be added to the forest polygon as inner members, unless trees are actually growing in the water.  :)  Cheers.
Vivek Dumre (2024-05-24 15:15:47+00:00): Good and accurate mapping. Keep contributing #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149760717
Supaplex (2024-04-09 08:45:24+00:00): 你好

請標注真實存在，或是正確的標示

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149765306
TomH (2024-04-09 10:27:17+00:00): Well there's no reason to think that's the entire pipeline, it's just the part somebody managed to map, which is why the ends don't connect to anything.

Here is the Bing Streetside imagery (a legitimate OSM source) for the Churchfield Road crossing which shows the marker pole: https://www.bing.com/maps?osid=3ca5f821-d9a0-4006-b135-aefee2f4106a&cp=51.814756~-0.164404&lvl=17&dir=116.25515&pi=-16.045433&style=x&v=2&sV=2&form=S00027
spookypeanut (2024-04-09 10:36:37+00:00): Man I love osm. It teaches me so much. You're absolutely right, removing the fixme (but I'm still surprised of the route it takes!). Now thinking of going out to try to find where it goes from the mapped end...
ivanbranco (2024-05-15 22:58:11+00:00): Hi Classe SNT Raess,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11804196193

This tree doesn't seem to be this tall. Could you take a look at it?

Thanks and happy mapping :)

French translation:

Bonjour Classe SNT Raess,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11804196193

Cet arbre ne semble pas être aussi grand. Pourriez-vous y jeter un œil ?

Merci et bon mapping :)
phoenixsaigon1698 (2024-04-15 07:10:53+00:00): Bạn ơi, trong changeset này của bạn bạn đã sửa oneway=yes thành oneway=no của đường tỉnh lộ 10. Nếu trong changeset của bạn chỉ là link các bus route lại thì đừng chỉnh sửa gì các thông tin khác liên quan đến chỉ đường giúp mình. Cám ơn bạn. Tuyến đường tỉnh lộ 10 là 1 chiều oto đi từ Bà Hom ra.
橘ヒカリ (2024-10-28 12:01:08+00:00): 您好，京沪高铁的名称请不要添加“铁路”二字。工务正式线名称即为“京沪高铁”。
HellMap (2024-04-11 13:21:17+00:00): Šo izmaiņu atcēlu, jo atkal ir pieļautas daudz kļūdu. Izdzēsts ceļa gabals bez paskaidrojuma. Atvienots ceļš no šosejas. Ceļš savienots ar lauku. Laukam izdzēsti punkti. Nobīdīti ar ortofoto sakrītoši ceļi. Noņemtas ceļa vērtības. Izdzēsts grāvis.

Jau daudz reižu iepriekš lūgts veikt izmaiņas uzmanīgāk un saprotami tās paskaidrot, it īpaši ceļa posmu dzēšanu. Citiem kartētājiem nav jūsu izmaiņas šādi katrreiz jālabo.

Šis ceļa posms izskatās pēc galvenās piebraukšanas Līgotnes 1 ciematam. Tas ortofoto redzams kā plats lauku ceļš. Kas tieši šajā vietā ir izmainījies? Ko nozīmē "purvs"?
antonr (2024-04-30 11:43:32+00:00): Hej Hammershoej

Fedt med noget vedligehold af vandreruter!

Du skriver at du reparerer på Hærvejen, men det ser ud til at faktisk er pilgrimsruten du har ændret det sted jeg lige har set efter: Ved Fyrklit går pilgrimsruten nu via https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1271086687 og trappen, mens Hærvejen ("Ved stranden", https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13278796) stadig går ad https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1052816947...

Waymarkedtrails.org er super til at få overblik over ruternes forløb, det var der jeg bemærkede ovenstående: https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#?map=17.0/57.58/9.9348

Er det meningen?

Andet spørgsmål: Når du ændrer på ruterne ud fra data fra Hærvejs-sekretariatet, hvordan sikrer du så at vejviserpæle allerede er flyttet tilsvarende? Hvis de ikke er flyttet endnu, tænker jeg at ruterne i openstreetmap skal forblive som skiltet i virkeligheden...

Mvh
antonr

PS har også tagget dig (tror jeg?) ovre i https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/danmarks-naturstier
jeka p (2024-04-12 18:51:41+00:00): Hi!
danke - habe mich vertippt.
SG
goldfndr (2024-04-09 21:56:36+00:00): The route marker tagging was a mistake, they're guideposts.
aTarom (2024-04-09 14:38:56+00:00): Hola, gracias por editar, parece que hay alguna dificultad para generar el multipolígono del nuevo edificio?
los line=yes
por ejemplo en
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1267534221/history
no son para indicar partes o huecos del edificio. Por aquí es complicado mostrar capturas de pantalla, que te parece si te pasas por el foro o el grupo de telegram para poder ayudar mejor?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:part

https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/es/51
https://t.me/OSMes
Saludos
CAI Stabia (2024-04-09 07:59:28+00:00): Ciao Andrea, come mai stai cancellando tutti i tag colour dagli itinerari escursionistici? 
In particolare questi non sono sentieri CAI ma di un associazione di Sorrento insieme al comune con cui il CAI Stabia collabora. Sono appunto contraddistinti da diversi colori
itineris (2024-11-15 10:13:10+00:00): Szia!

Attól, hogy kicsit odébb húztad a 1261365119-es way-t még
- így sem illeszkedik a FÖMI-re,
- így sincs ott épület, ami pl. a Bingen is látszik, világoskék színnel,
- így nem meglepő, hogy azon a helyen az OSM-en már van egy nyitott úszómedence, amivel ütközik az általad berajzolt "épület".

Üdv:
Ákos
Hungarian_user (2024-11-15 13:20:25+00:00): Nem találom ezt a "1261365119-es way"-t szerkesztési nézetben, és a Nominatim se találja. Kérek egy OSM linket, vagy többet, ahol ezeket meg lehet nézni.
Hungarian_user (2024-11-15 13:22:21+00:00): Van egy ilyen számú way, valahol az USA területén.
itineris (2024-11-15 13:23:32+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1261365119
sfphoton (2024-04-09 08:53:46+00:00): Szia!

Nem tudom, hogy te észrevetted-e, de nekem most tűnt fel, hogy az openstreetmap.org-on nem jelenik meg a Mátra nevű erdő, amit ebben a changeset-ben is szerkesztettél. ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3334074 ) Én is jártam már így egy hasonló landuse multipolygonnal, nekem az volt a gond, hogy iD-ben úgy pakoltam a határoló vonalakat, hogy egy picike helyen két landuse relation átfedett egymással, és eltűnt az erdő.

A problémáról így tudsz meggyőződni:
1. menj fel openstreetmap.org-ra, és nézd meg a Mátrát
2. zoomolj bele legalább 14-es szintig (közvetlen link: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=14/47.8947/19.8507 )
3. nyomd meg a Ctrl+F5 kombót, hogy tuti a legfrissebb képet lásd

Azt sajnos nem tudom, hogy ebben a changeset-ben van-e a hiba, vagy hogy egyáltalán te okoztad-e. Én csak most vettem észre, és nem tudom, hogy hogyan lehetne kideríteni. De meg tudod esetleg nézni a dolgot?
Fapapucs (2024-04-09 09:48:23+00:00): Szia !
Valóban..sajnos nem tudom mi lehet az oka és hogy mit tehetnék ellene.
Fapapucs (2024-04-09 10:17:29+00:00): Javítva!
sfphoton (2024-04-09 10:20:30+00:00): Nagyon király vagy, köszönöm szépen! Mi volt a gond?
Fapapucs (2024-04-09 11:11:07+00:00): Szia!
Mivel a völgyek vonallal vannak jelölve és a Mátra (telepített erdő) polygon tagjává tettem őket, a Mátra nevű polygon nyitott maradt.