piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NorthCrab_upload (2024-10-21 20:50:50+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12277387584
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/908873351

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-10-23 12:50:17+00:00): Jakie jest źródło tej edycji? Czy jest równie wiarygodne jak to mapowanie fikcyjnego lotniska?
Barroszt (2025-08-04 22:33:13+00:00): naprawione 10 miesięcy temu (geoportal źródłem)
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2024-10-22 17:41:20+00:00): Small nitpick: driveways leading to houses are service roads (and a service road can be a driveway too).

Unclassified, despite its name, in Estonia is often used for non-residential not very important roads. Usually they have more than 5-digit reference number in road registry.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dunclassified

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Ddriveway
5m4u9 (2024-10-22 03:44:53+00:00): Hola, bienvenido al mapa!

los límites actuales son los que acordaron la asocación de municipios de cochabamba, como no existen otros límites disponible, no va bien cambiar.

hay varios proyectos de ley en la asamblea nacional que creo definen estos límites...
VictorIE (2026-07-19 13:27:07+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12256242405/

For amenity=charging_station, capacity=* means the number of vehicles that can be charged at the same time. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station

charging_station:output=* might be a more suitable tag.
Langlaeufer (2024-10-24 12:35:11+00:00): Hier ist werder Rad- noch Fußweg
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158188313
Nod5t5 (2024-10-24 17:53:19+00:00): oops, die Konzentrationsgrenze war wohl erreicht. Schnell reverted
Langlaeufer (2024-10-24 18:09:07+00:00): Kann passieren ;)
GerdP (2024-10-31 20:05:41+00:00): Moin aus Wildeshausen!
Ich wundere mich gerade über diesen Wegweiser: https://www.osm.org/node/12277478709
Wenn ich das richtig sehe, dann hätte ich diese Zwischenwegweiser https://www.osm.org/node/12064948489 genau dort an dem Laternenpfahl mappen sollen. Sind die tatsächlich wieder durch Wegweiser ersetzt worden?  Nach meinen Infos war da früher ein Wegweiser, der aber in diesem Jahr durch die grün-weißen Pfeile ersetzt wurde.
BB-plan (2024-10-31 20:54:02+00:00): Hallo,
bin mir ziemlich sicher, dort vor ca. zwei Wochen im Vorbeifahren die grün-weißen Radwegweiser mit Richtungsangaben im südöstlichen Kreuzungsbereich stehen gesehen zu haben.
So hab' ich's mir jedenfalls auch auf meiner Navikarte vermerkt.
Ob da Routen-marker waren, weiß ich nicht.
Kann gerne bei nächsten Mal noch mal genauer nachschauen.
GerdP (2024-10-31 21:42:20+00:00): Wäre schon gut. Ich habe Zugriff auf die (vorläufigen) Planungsdaten zum neuen Knotenpunktnetz und da ist an dieser Stelle die Demontage der alten Wegweiser und als Ersatz eben nur die zwei grünen Pfeile vorgesehen. Diese Pfeile habe ich im Sommer gesehen, Wegweiser war weg.
GerdP (2024-11-20 07:08:11+00:00): Ich war am 16.11. dort und es gab keinen Wegweiser. Habe aber bei der Gelegenheit noch einen weiteren Marker gefunden. Habe das entsprechend korrigiert:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159352856

Ich vermute mal, Du hast Mapillary oder Streetview als Quelle verwendet. Die sind im LK Diepholz praktisch sicher veraltet, wenn es um die Radwegweisung geht. Seit Sommer wird hier ja fast alles umgebaut.
flohoff (2024-10-23 07:52:17+00:00): Hi,
seit wann ist denn auf der Werrestraße wieder 50? Die Bilder die ich habe da stehen da überall 30 Schilder.

Flo
silversurfer83 (2024-10-22 20:02:26+00:00): Moin Heinrich,

danke, dass du hilfst die Datenbank aktuell zu halten.

Du hast darum gebeten, dass sich jemand diese Änderung ansieht. Ich mach das mal:

Da du außer deinem Kommentar keinen Kontext lieferst, kann ich nicht sagen, ob das so in Ordnung ist.
Warum ist hier keine Brücke mehr? Wird sie erneuert? Ist sie ersatzlos entfernt worden? Ist sie nur gesperrt?

Würde mich über Rückmeldung freuen.

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158189141
HeinrichStuerzl (2024-10-22 22:16:12+00:00): Die "Gehwegbrücke Eckelshausen" ist seit dem 29. April 2024 wegen dem Baubeginn der Ortsumgehung Eckelshausen (17. Juni 2024) abgebaut. Die Fertigstellung der Ortsumgehung soll voraussichtlich im vierten Quartal 2027 erfolgen. Ob an dieser Stelle eine neue Brücke geplant ist, ist unklar.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158189141
silversurfer83 (2024-10-24 17:07:06+00:00): Hallo Heinrich,
danke für die gute Rückmeldung.
Ich werde das mal entsprechend anpassen, damit es keine Missverständnisse auf Grund der Luftbilder gibt.

Um es genauer zu machen noch eine Frage: der Weg westlich der Lahn, ist der auch irgendwo in seinem Verlauf zur Lahn gesperrt?

(hier ist meine Interpretation der Situation: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158306042
Beachte, dass die Brücke im "Bearbeiten"-Modus als gestrichelte Linie mit einer Notiz sichtbar ist.)

cheers
silversurfer83
HeinrichStuerzl (2024-10-25 08:45:02+00:00): Die geänderte Darstellung ist für mich OK. Mir war wichtig, dass die abgebaute Brücke in OSM entfernt ist, damit es hier nicht mehr zu falschen Tourenplanungen kommt.

Ob der Weg westlich der Lahn auch irgendwo in seinem Verlauf zur Lahn gesperrt ist, weiß ich nicht.

Schöne Grüße
Heinrich Stürzl
emersonveenstra (2024-10-24 11:10:07+00:00): Hi there,

On https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/499569525/history and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1322354659 you have conflicting values for "sidewalk" and "sidewalk:both", would you mind going back and fixing those? Thanks!
mycota (2024-10-24 18:08:39+00:00): Thanks for pointing these out. I've fixed the tags.
mueschel (2024-10-22 14:02:08+00:00): Hi,
could you check this way, it doesn't have proper tags:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1327113211
dromedar61 (2024-10-22 15:00:57+00:00): thanks for checking, is fixed now.
ratrun (2024-10-24 17:48:42+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM,

here you changed a  stream into a highway=primary : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/476569787/history

and  here as well: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/476569790

These changes do not make sense because there are already existing roads and the new ones are not even connected. These changes also do not match your changeset title "Made some pedestrian roads into bus roads". Can you please describe what you intend with your changes? 
Maye I can help out with how you can properly apply your change then.

I believe the best might be to completely revert this change and start again from scratch. I may apply this revert for you based on your response.

Thank you
ratrun
YorkiePudd (2024-10-24 18:00:18+00:00): Hi, I was still learning how to edit Open Street Maps and clearly didn't do a great job I was trying to make it so vehicles had access to Hall Ings and buses had access to Bridge Street and Sunbridge Road up to the A6181 junction.
ratrun (2024-10-24 18:24:41+00:00): Thank you. I now only partially reverted your changes in this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158308645 Could you please check?
YorkiePudd (2024-10-24 21:51:23+00:00): I'm not sure what I'm looking at TBH it looks like Hall Ings isn't attached to Princes Way properly and also goes onto Sunbridge Road for some reason
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-10-31 23:41:09+00:00): Hi
Do you have a source for Jacob's Well roundabout on Princes Way and Hall Ings south of city park still being open?
Mapillary or Kartaview imagery would be ideal.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mapillary
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/KartaView
YorkiePudd (2024-10-31 23:49:05+00:00): I got the impression the road closure was temporary while they demolished the car park, but I could be wrong
Enock4seth (2024-11-22 12:41:39+00:00): Hi, thanks for mapping. When you map `building=*` there's no need to add a landuse tag, in this case `landuse=residential` and `building=residential`, example https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1327085920

You can also see the possible values / tag combinations that can be used by visiting the OSM wiki page for the key/tag, e.g. for house=* https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:house
GUFSZ (2025-08-31 14:00:09+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4417256

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1327119813/history/1

Das mit dem Landuse dürfte sich erledigt haben.
Fen <3 (2024-10-22 21:24:06+00:00): Hi Glassman!
I am new to this and I have a question! The address tag currently lists "119;315" should the 315 be removed? if not, what is its purpose? 
Thanks and have a wonderful day!
happy mapping - Fen
Glassman (2024-10-22 22:02:54+00:00): Yep - 315 should be removed. My mistake. I copied the node over to the building and then merged the node with the building. Should have caught that.

Fixed now. Thanks for finding it.
ceyu (2024-10-22 17:24:01+00:00): Vielen Dank für den tollen CS! Aber warum wurde manchmal operator=Minimundus entfernt wie bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3371546695/history ?
hlfan (2024-10-23 09:20:32+00:00): Wie ich anfangs drüber gegangen bin hab ich eher mehr als weniger entfernt, und später hab ich mir gedacht, dass es sehr redundant wäre, bei über 100 Elementen im selben Themenpark den operator desselben zu übernehmen. Kann man aber gern wieder hinzufügen.
nevw (2024-10-22 02:00:14+00:00): Hi, I added the parking and way tags as highway=service plus service=parking_aisle. I also added the driveways for the affected houses so that should resolve the issue. 
The navigation apps may take some time to update their data.
nevw (2024-10-24 06:34:02+00:00): OSR(car) is now using latest data and using the correct route
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_car&route=-27.524301%2C153.077083%3B-27.525779%2C153.078784#map=18/-27.524737/153.077770
nevw (2024-10-24 06:44:18+00:00): ….just have to get 18 Cunard Street to use Cunard Street instead of the neighbours driveway at the rear 🫤
nevw (2024-10-24 20:03:52+00:00): Valhalla(car) now works
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_valhalla_car&route=-27.524449%2C153.076126%3B-27.525552%2C153.078632#map=17/-27.525408/153.078191
ngry_pazuzu (2024-10-22 01:01:49+00:00): More barriers have been put up on Telegraph Trail. Need to cycle or drive to see where.
ForestFurnace (2024-10-22 02:20:31+00:00): Monroe County, NY's website states that these trails permit both hiking and biking.
https://www.monroecounty.gov/parks-baywest
I am not sure which "anti biking mentalities" you are referring to, but all of the mountain bikers have been very friendly to me when I have hiked in this park.
ForestFurnace (2024-10-22 02:42:57+00:00): Specifically, the white trails (and any stray non-color named paths) are the only trails in this park that should be set to bicycle: no.
https://www.mygroc.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/2022_IBPW.pdf
phoenixsaigon1698 (2024-10-23 03:50:49+00:00): Đường 1 chiều, oto, 2 chiều xe máy ở SG và HN đang để theo kiểu
oneway=yes
oneway:motorcycle=no rất nhiều và đang hoạt động tốt ở các thuật toán tìm đường mã nguồn mở.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-18 04:51:02+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165095601
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-01-03 14:17:02+00:00): Hello
Why was this ramp tagged as a path?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/38176253
Is the ramp being demolished?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
RoadGeek_MD99 (2025-02-15 21:36:53+00:00): You're right.  I've changed these ramps to demolished or abandoned:highway= motorway_links and removed the other tags.
rskedgell (2024-10-26 17:46:31+00:00): Please stop mis-tagging signalised crossings as crossing=uncontrolled

The crossing represented by n33408745 is between two traffic lights. It's definitely controlled (that's what the traffic lights are for) and is now correctly tagged as crossing=traffic_signals

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/33408745
emersonveenstra (2024-10-26 21:03:32+00:00): Hi there,

You broke https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/45859648 by dragging a node, could you please fix this? Thanks!
ScrawnyMeowth1 (2025-05-27 20:48:14+00:00): Hello Grintal! For future reference, please only use the name= box for official names of features.
Warin61 (2024-10-23 00:18:32+00:00): Cease!!!!

I do not believe these are 'unincorporated areas'!

NSW lists only 2, TWO, 'unincorporated areas.

The 'National Report' states "data
in this report that relates to local government may not be directly comparable to that for
local governing bodies."

------------------------------
Secondly COPYRIGHT!
Creative Commons 4 is not compatible with OSM requirements...
Warin61 (2024-10-23 00:25:55+00:00): The maps avalible (see here https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/territories-regions-cities/local-government/publications/national-reports) do not have the resolution that you have been using ... so what maps are you using - please provide one link to one of the maps.
billybobbyjoe (2024-10-23 01:29:44+00:00): Anywhere not defined by DCS as a local government area is an unincorporated area. The National Report national map provides the names of the different groupings of unincorporated areas (South Coast, Central Coast, Mid-North Coast and Northern Rivers). DCS boundaries indicate where specifically in these regions the unincorporated areas are, and they are all uninhabited islands. Regarding copyright, the map is not under Creative Commons 4 but under the Commonwealth of Australia; this data is free to use for non-commercial research purposes with the correct credit.
billybobbyjoe (2024-10-23 01:31:34+00:00): I'm using SixMaps, an application for displaying DCS data. I go up the coast and identify the islands not defined in LGAs, thus making them unincorporated areas.
aharvey (2024-10-23 02:43:29+00:00): Either way I think a change of this scale is worth discussion first, especially when there may be different opinions within the community.

I'm fine with a revert, followed by a discussion, best to do that on talk-au or https://community.openstreetmap.org/ not here.

> this data is free to use for non-commercial research purposes with the correct credit.

OpenStreetMap does not fit that criteria.
Warin61 (2024-10-23 07:41:36+00:00): SIX maps are a no no...

Use the DCS Base Map that should be available in your editor ... possibly under 'imagery' 'map'... Note this does not identify 'unincorporated areas' ... 

-------------------
Do these areas you have identified have a local population? If not how are they to 'elect a council'???
Warin61 (2024-10-24 04:31:40+00:00): Part revert to restore non crossing of ways.
hatul (2024-10-27 15:51:32+00:00): שלום יצחק

מה הרעיון של היחס הזה? יש יחס אחר לשביל הר הנגב. אם השביל שונה אין מה לשמור יחס למקומות שהוא לא מסומן.
Yitzchak M (2024-10-27 15:59:51+00:00): אני הולך על שביל הר הנגב המקורי במקטעים. ועד השבילים מחקו את השביל לגמרי ממפה הנוחכית שלהם, אבל יש מטיילים שעדיין מעוניין לטייל בו. כל מקטע שאני מטייל, אני מוסיף ליחס הזה. נא לא למחוק! הוא לא מפריע למפה בכלל.
Frans S (2024-10-29 14:25:39+00:00): Hello. Thanks for  mapping.
Here, you mapped small unidentified objects in ponds and tagged them as a building. 
These objects are no buildings. 
Don't add a generic nametag 'building 'to a mapping.
I removed them.
Best regards
mavl (2024-10-22 03:39:17+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 158181763, 158182043, 158182296, 158182405, 158188381.
Warin61 (2024-10-23 23:40:05+00:00): Reverted.
a) No one lives on Bird Isl. so no one can elect a local government. 
b) it is controlled by NPWS..
dpolovinkin (2025-03-27 16:06:57+00:00): hi, can you in next couple days please explain the source of those roads which you added there as they are not on satellite which is even one month old, or I'm reporting for vandalism, thx
imiii (2025-03-28 03:11:30+00:00): @dpolovinkin , as stated in the source tag, the roads were taken from sentinel-2 imagery.

I've made a small imgur album with relevant material: https://imgur.com/a/uSTZeFK

You will see there a recent sentinel-2 image where the roads are _clearly_ visible. In addition, I've added two photos taken on the ground: one at the entrance of the site showing the main roads, and one photo taken on the site showing what kind of roads the site has ATM.

This is a known development plan that's been covered by the media, including https://cambojanews.com/relocation-site-expanded-for-thousands-more-angkor-families-facing-removal/
dpolovinkin (2025-03-28 03:23:03+00:00): I see, thx, didn't know what is this sentinel thing, more you know! I thought it cant be random based on geometry + your changeset count, but weird that it's not on the latest satellite which I used in RapidEditor.. but now at least for future others can understand where does it come from
dpolovinkin (2025-03-28 03:28:06+00:00): btw also noticed, can you pls write meaningful changeset comments when editing, as all yours are pretty much "random" all the time, country:city name doesn't say much as it's already clear from the changeset location itself, but "random" has 0 info and isn't rly allowed, people get blocks for that - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

this changeset is a good example when a proper comment would have explained this thing right away
imiii (2025-03-28 03:56:44+00:00): One point regarding RapidEditor: the Esri Wayback background layer does not always reflect the actual date shown in the combobox. When a given date is not available (which is most of the time in Cambodia outside of main cities), you'll just get the most recent version.

For example, in this specific area, even though the combobox would say "2025-02-27", the image you're getting is many years old.
dpolovinkin (2025-03-28 04:10:14+00:00): ahhh, so that's whats happening... hmm not cool, was often referring to those dates when editing, thanks!
skquinn (2024-10-22 05:47:03+00:00): Hi,

From the wiki:

"Do not use description=* for advertising messages. They will be removed as spam and may also have further consequences for your OSM account."

The description tag you added had apparent ad copy and was thus deleted.
GerdP (2024-10-23 08:06:12+00:00): Korrektur Copy+Paste Fehler: Radtour am 20.10.2024
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-18 04:51:03+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165095601
Ropino (2024-11-20 16:51:22+00:00): Hi,
welcome to OSM.

I found your new highway=bus_route in case of quality checks.
Bus routes are not separate highways.
Information about bus routes see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Buses
I propose to remove this way, because a road exists nearby. You can use this road (-segments) to create a (new) bus route.
Thx in advance
GerdP (2024-10-23 08:06:28+00:00): Korrektur Copy+Paste Fehler: Radtour am 20.10.2024
GerdP (2024-10-23 08:06:46+00:00): Korrektur Copy+Paste Fehler: Radtour am 20.10.2024
silversurfer83 (2024-10-22 20:09:04+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap :)

thank you for contributing to the database.

There's some things I'd like to say to help you make even better contributions:

- please write better changeset comments as this article here explains: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

- the building you added looks pretty rectangular to me. To make your objects rectangular you can use the "Q"-key on your keyboard after you set the properties of the object.

- in case of questions please reach out to the community at c.osm.org or consult the wiki at wiki.osm.org
We're always happy to help.

happy mapping
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158195428
map per (2024-11-02 14:30:12+00:00): Hallo rschmidm,

die Hausnummer 48 (1) sieht komisch aus, alle anderen geraden Nummern sind auf der anderen Straßenseite.

Viele Grüße
map per

(1) https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/176675084/history
rschmidm (2024-11-03 16:23:04+00:00): Hallo map per, 

in der Tat, ich habe Hausnummer 48 gerade gelöscht. Hausnummer 49 ist richtig, bin gerade vorbeigegangen.

Viele Grüße,
rschmidm
map per (2024-11-05 18:15:48+00:00): Danke, die Hausnummer hat dann vermutlich die Adressvorschlag Funktion von Vespucci erfunden
JeroenHoek (2024-10-22 06:48:41+00:00): Ik heb maar even een BAG-terugmelding gedaan. Dit kun je in de BAG-viewer doen bij het object:

https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/?searchQuery=1730100000031219&objectId=1730100000031219

Als er 'bouw gestart' staat zoals nu, dan neemt de BAG-importplugin het pand steeds mee.
user_3216889 (2024-10-22 07:12:47+00:00): Prima, dank.
JeroenHoek (2024-10-22 12:02:21+00:00): Helaas, de fundering ligt er volgens de gemeente al wel. Daardoor blijft hij op 'bouw gestart' staan.

Wat je zou kunnen doen is hem terugzetten met de juiste bag:ref, maar dan in plaats van building=yes er proposed:building=yes van maken. Dat zou moeten voorkomen dat de importer hem weer als building erin zit.
JeroenHoek (2024-10-22 12:04:14+00:00): Er valt wel iets te zien:

https://viewer.satellietdataportaal.nl/@53.19574,6.520509,18/?datastrip=20240929_PNEO-03
user_3216889 (2024-10-22 12:45:39+00:00): Wat grondwerk van een jaar geleden (zie sat.beeld 17-10-2023).
Heb het nu weer teruggezet, met building en huisnummer voorzien van prefix proposed.
JeroenHoek (2024-10-22 12:52:26+00:00): Maar eens kijken of dat zo goed gaat. Ik weet dat het met building:part bijvoorbeeld geen problemen geeft, dus ik verwacht dat dit zo met proposed:building ook werkt.

Je zou trouwens nog even een note-tag toe kunnen voegen met daarin dat de bouw nog niet gestart is buiten wat grondwerk, dat helpt andere mappers als zij deze tegenkomen bij het importeren van gebouwen. Het is altijd irritant als de BAG niet klopt met de werkelijkheid.
user_3216889 (2024-10-22 13:09:18+00:00): Heb nog een note toegevoegd.
Ik laat het hierbij. Gebied komt vanzelf weer onder de aandacht, aangezien een casino is gepland tussen Ambitielaan en de N7.

Dank voor het meedenken en de suggesties.

Groeten,
Henk
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-06 03:12:28+00:00): Cleaned up SEO spam tags for Two Men and a Truck POI in changeset 183720842

https://osm.org/changeset/183720842
BCNorwich (2024-11-14 07:23:21+00:00): Hi, These areas you've mapped are not building outlines nor are they named "building".  Could you please make corrections or remove the areas.

Regards Bernard.
Gaël Wogenstahl (2024-10-23 05:48:35+00:00): Erreur lors de la modification de la rue Jules Garnier
indigomc (2024-11-06 18:42:00+00:00): Hi Shweta1211

This is to tell you that I'm deleting the 'Thesis site' addition that you made to the ruins at Hampe, apparently marking cliffs into a new chasm at the centre of this site. 

Maybe it is supposed to indicate something else. If so, please state for discussion as needed - e.g. are there archaelogical digs taking place in the area? I believe the ASI is carrying out some digs. 

Without explanation, I assume that it was a joke, but if so, it is one of the type that would 'bring OSM into disrepute'. Please don't do it again. Thanks, from editor indigomc.
Aleksandar Matejevic (2024-11-08 12:11:12+00:00): Good change
freeExec (2024-10-23 05:37:05+00:00): не нужно лепить фейковую высоту, если она не была измерена. количество этажей достаточно
GerdP (2024-10-23 08:06:56+00:00): Korrektur Copy+Paste Fehler: Radtour am 20.10.2024
ManuelB701 (2024-10-27 18:31:05+00:00): Schon wieder hast du eine Einbahnstraße ohne Grund nicht mehr als solche beschrieben und habe es extra vor Ort überprüft.

Der Riedweg ist tatsächlich keine Einbahnstraße mehr aber Am Leitgraben ist und war immer eine gewesen.

Was ist der Grund, warum du Am Leitgraben überhaupt umgetaggt hast, auch wenn diese sich nie änderte?
literan (2024-10-22 17:44:38+00:00): пути на layer=-5, так что логично и стрелки на тот же layer кинуть. Исправил.
ad47 (2024-10-23 07:03:50+00:00): Спасибо, я как-то не глядя их под землю опустил со слоя земли.