piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
GeorgePsarras (2026-01-13 10:07:58+00:00): Hi,
Thank you for taking the time to write to me. As you can probably tell, this is my first attempt to make edits to OpenStreetMap.
I work for HORIBA MIRA and I was assigned to a project with a goal to update the OSM of our facilities. The driver for this project was that the map was mainly generated by individuals outside our organisation who could only assign features based on visual information mainly produced by aerial photography.
While this can produce partially accurate results, it tells half the story.
As we move towards autonomous vehicle validation, some of the features of our maps need to be able to adapt to the new era. Just to give you an example, our No1 High speed circuit was classified as a motorsport racetrack. A classification like this prohibits autonomous vehicle scenario based tasting when the vehicle under test uses OSM to download the map, as the vehicle believes it's outside its ODD (Operational Design Domain).
Changing the type to motorway, enables the vehicle under test to operate on our facilities.
Another example is the use of name. You mentioned the use of "Circular Platform" as a misused name descriptor. In reality, this area of our proving ground is called Circular Platform. Although we might have a large number of platforms on site, and some of them could be circular as well, if a customer/employee asks for directions for the Circular Platform, there is only one destination we will get at. I agree the name is as descriptive as it could be, but that's the actual name of the facility. BTW, all the names are documented on the official Proving ground driver's handbook.
Another example to demonstrate the   inconsistencies when mapping just from aerial photography is the two areas South of the Circular platform (East & West Tangential). From the aerial photography someone could classify these as roads (minor / service) . In reality, the vehicles using those areas can utilise them as single carriageway one direction, single carriageway two directions, single lane with features (bus stop, cones, chicane, road blocks etc.). In addition, it has also been used as a maze (with features blocking the path) for autonomous navigation activities.
I'm not claiming that my work is perfect, I'm trying to comply with the  rules but I'm in a difficult position as I keep finding that our use case proves to be an anomaly for OSM and maybe we should turn as a business to a different provider. I still believe though that this would be a wasted opportunity for OSM to be widely adopted by vehicle OEMs.
Apologies for the long post, hope you had the patience to read it!
Still interested in your thoughts...
George
Aethonatic (2026-01-13 13:29:05+00:00): We advise that you make changes to how your tests function instead of utilising inappropriate tagging for features on OpenStreetMap. And silversurfer83 is right, please use the description tag instead of name if "Circular Platform" is not its actual name, and don't delete existing objects. And please, do go to c.osm.org to discuss with the community your recent edits.

Also, please relay everything we've said to David Wood HM who seems to also be connected with your company. Thank you!
GeorgePsarras (2026-01-13 14:26:19+00:00): Hi @Aethonatic,
Could you please clarify the following points:
- As the issue is not with our test functions but with the adaptation of OSM from vehicle OEMs and the VCA, do you suggest we should inform those parties that  OSM is not  the correct map platform for their use cases and they should move to an alternative provider?
- Can I use the name "Circular Platform" for a feature if the actual name is "Circular platform"?
- If an object is not there can I delete it?
David Wood  is aware of our discussions and will be informed.
Thanks!
Aethonatic (2026-01-13 14:42:49+00:00): A. If you find that our purposes aren't suitable for your use cases, then it would be wise to look elsewhere.
B. Yes.
C. Yes.
silversurfer83 (2026-01-13 15:12:06+00:00): Hello George and Aethonatic,

thank you for the thorough explanation. I did read it all, indeed.

- It is kinda exciting to know that our data is used this way. The reasons may be many and I will not speculate at this point.

- We have guidelines set down in our wiki on how certain features are to be "mapped". We can not allow for every commercial data consumer to deviate from these guidelines just so their use case works. It doesn't work that way around.

- Still, OSM is a collection of many views and if these objects are clearly named that way in your facility, that's fine. One could argue, that if they aren't signposted, loc_name=* would be better for many.

- taking the Circular Platform as example: I do not believe highway=services is a good choice here.

- if an object is not there (anymore) you are certainly free to delete it from the database. To take the Platform again: There werde OSM-Objects in that place which you (or your colleague) have removed and put your own objects there. This is not the way. If something isn't well drawn or placed you are free to modify it so it better fits reality on the ground.

Sorry to cut short here. Tight schedule.

Maybe it isn't too bad an idea for you to move to c.osm.org to discuss your intentions.

cheers
rskedgell (2026-01-13 16:51:29+00:00): (Review requested)

That looks fine, thanks for updating OSM.
Lê Tuấn Minh (2026-01-12 15:08:56+00:00): Bổ sung thêm: Tôi đã để đoạn đường này thành secondary dựa trên thực tế về điều kiện con đường này và ko phải đoạn nào cũng đc rải nhựa asphalt và nhiều đoạn cũ nát
eggie (2026-01-12 15:16:14+00:00): Welkom bij OSM.
Voeg ook de aard van een bedrijf toe.
Bv shop=car 
Je ziet anders niets op de kaart.

Mvg
eggie
MosKartograf (2026-01-18 18:30:23+00:00): Здравствуйте, коллега! А точно под обрисовку не попал фундамент сгоревшего в 2011/2012 году здания?
Ozon OSM15 (2026-01-19 09:59:12+00:00): Здравствуйте.
Прошу прощения ,невнимательно посмотрела.
Исправила.
Удалила обрисовку здания
MosKartograf (2026-01-19 17:14:25+00:00): Спасибо! В этой местности основная проблема ботанический состав насаждений. Увы, дистанционно мало что из него можно уточнить.
rskedgell (2026-01-13 16:47:21+00:00): When you say "private", do you mean that the road is privately owned (unadopted), or only accessible with explicit permission (usually gated)?

If it's the former, appropriate tagging might be ownership=private + access=destination

Also, I note that you have given "Highway NSG data" as a source. Unless this is released under the Open Government Licence (OGL), it is unlikely to be suitable for use with OpenStreetMap. The terms of use for the NSG data released by GeoPlace only allows for personal use.
https://www.findmystreet.co.uk/terms-of-use

There are some open datasets available from Ordnance Survey under OGL, which include OS Open Roads and OS Open USRN.
Zico UK (2026-01-13 17:29:47+00:00): Hi Rskedgell, sorry meant to say that it's un-adopted. It's accessible to the public but is not part of the public adopted highway. I wasn't sure where this would be on the edit.

I quote the NSG as I have access to this via work, but the details can also be verified by FindMyStreet as mixed maintainable - https://www.findmystreet.co.uk/map?usrn=40606555
Herwescheluc (2026-01-16 15:52:33+00:00): Hallo, Henner9595,

habe eigentlich keine Ahnung von Windkraftanlagen, aber hier fällt mir durch einen Hinweis in OSMOSE (https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/de/map/#zoom=14&lat=50.67854&lon=8.30476&item=1200&level=1%2C2%2C3&loc=12/50.79311/8.16289&issue_uuid=9b4de364-024c-a0bf-4f1e-3318048e5049) die Anlage auf.

Wofür dient hier die Relation? Macht es nicht mehr Sinn, einfach das einzelne Windrad oder die komplette Fläche als Windpark Haiger II zu markieren, zudem hier ja kein weiteres Windrad geplant ist?

Ich lass' mich gerne belehren!

Grüße aus Herborn

Andreas
onterof (2026-02-13 16:52:13+00:00): Im Marktstammdatenregister sind Erweiterungen von Windparks manchmal mit römischen Ziffern durchnummeriert (auch wenn's sich nur um eine WKA handelt).
Hab die Relation mal zusammengelegt mit der des "Haupt"-Windparks (die Endziffern wurden ja weiter hochgezählt). So wird/wurde das auch in den meisten Fällen gehandhabt, der Windpark bezieht sich im Sprachgebrauch normal ja auf alle zusammengehörigen Anlagen.
Eine dritte Erweiterung (Nr. 8-10) ist wohl noch in Planung.
Grüße
Herwescheluc (2026-02-13 18:18:58+00:00): Hallo, onterof,

Danke für die Bearbeitung! Ich verfolge die Entwicklung dort mittlerweile seit Jahrzehnten, von einer Erweiterung ist mir bisher nichts bekannt, gibt's dazu irgendwo nähere Infos?

Herzliche Grüße

Andreas
onterof (2026-02-13 18:33:18+00:00): Im offiziellen Register sind seit ca. Oktober 2025 weitere Anlagen als in Planung gelistet.
https://www.marktstammdatenregister.de/MaStR/Einheit/Einheiten/OeffentlicheEinheitenuebersicht?filter=Gemeinde~eq~%27Haiger%27~and~Betriebs-Status~eq~%2731%27~and~Energietr%C3%A4ger~eq~%272497%27
Herwescheluc (2026-02-13 23:04:33+00:00): 😍
tyr_asd (2026-01-12 15:18:00+00:00): see also the discussion on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176679044
whb (2026-01-13 14:16:14+00:00): Guten Tag,

die Absperrung existiert, aber offenbar hatte ein Mapper einen Punkt der Absperrung um ca. 360 m verschoben:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159754567

Die Absperrung habe ich jetzt wiederhergestellt:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/340782750

Vor der Löschung ist es oft hilfreich erstmal den ursprünglichen Zustand eines Objekts anzusehen.

Viele Grüße
whb
Niiepce (2026-01-25 13:32:59+00:00): Hallo whb,

Danke, dass du dir das nochmal genau angeschaut hast und verbessert hast.

Viele Grüße
Niiepce
eggie (2026-01-12 15:30:34+00:00): Alle tagging gaat in uk english. Beter shop=car gebruiken. Dat levert ook een symbool op.
Bedrijfswagen is niet valide
KoenBerg (2026-01-12 15:35:13+00:00): Thanks eggie!
Kees 59 (2026-01-13 15:39:59+00:00): Probleempje met telefoonnummer?

https://confusedbuffalo.github.io/phone-report/nederland/ gaf een melding vanwege een syntax probleem in het telefoonnummer. Dat heb ik aangepast echter op de website staat een ander nummer (+31 342 729 170), Heb jij enig idee hoe dat in elkaar steekt of zijn beide nummers misschien correct.

Het nummer dat in deze CS is gezet wordt gemeld door Google en staat op facebook (https://www.facebook.com/DUTCHVansBarneveld) 

En op autoscout24 nog een derde nummer gevonden +31 342 788 141
KoenBerg (2026-01-14 17:51:40+00:00): Goed opgemerkt, dat verschil komt door call tracking. Dat is inderdaad iets om overal eens gelijk te trekken 🙂

@Kees het doel van deze wijzigingen was hoofdzakelijk dat Flitsmeister de data gebruikt en dat de company_name (handelsnaam) nu doorzoekbaar wordt in plaats van de huidige KvK-entiteit. Heb je hier nog advies over?
KoenBerg (2026-01-14 17:53:26+00:00): @kees 59 *
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-01-27 20:52:11+00:00): Hello!

You used
place=islet;
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/195365391/history

Have you maybe meant
place=islet
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
andershl (2026-01-28 09:16:55+00:00): Overpass Turbo found all 6. Fixed within 2 minutes.
Glassman (2026-01-14 18:42:26+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177142980
Frans S (2026-01-28 12:26:45+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please do not tag highways in rural areas as a residential road, Unclassified is a better choice.
Best  regards
0235 (2026-01-21 21:35:51+00:00): Hello Open@2025. This is a very large bounding box for the source being "local knowledge". Do you have other information about the source, or is this standard aerial imagery mapping from the Bing Maps layer?

It can be quite difficult for people to track the location of changes when edits take place over a large area.

Many thanks,
0235
user_22414150 (2026-01-26 18:04:58+00:00): Hello 0235, Thanks for commenting my Changesets and Good night..,🤣🤣🤣
ADAC Touristische InfoSysteme (2026-01-13 14:25:27+00:00): Are you sure about the population? Whats the source?
Rainero (2026-03-20 20:53:39+00:00): Revert mit changeset/180176850
(unzulässige Quelle)
watmildon (2026-01-19 19:39:44+00:00): Oh that's funny. I was just starting to look at population tag stuff and how to get things tidied up.
quincylvania (2026-01-20 00:22:40+00:00): Yeah I was sort of shocked at how few boundaries had population tags. I guess no one was really using these for labeling. I cleaned up most of them in North America but only where the boundary has a label node with the same name, which isn't true for a lot of townships and counties.
NeisBot (2026-01-17 15:30:04+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13450568911 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Pousada em área de preservação natural com pesca esportiva"
---
Por exemplo, uma versão mais neutra e factual do seu texto poderia ser: "Pousada em área de preservação natural com pesca esportiva"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-01-25 07:36:43+00:00): ❌ Text fixed by https://osm.org/changeset/177341557
aighes (2026-01-13 02:19:32+00:00): Hey jaspinal, please review your changes. It seems you mass-edited those cycle paths. A lot of ways which should be either footway=crossings or cycleway=crossing are now falsely tagged as footway=sidewalk.

Please take more care while editing in the future and review each element one-by-one.
jaspinal (2026-01-13 12:26:26+00:00): Thanks for the comment aighes. Can confirm they should be footway=crossings, none of them are cycle paths. Will ensure consistency as further changes are made. Cheers!
aighes (2026-01-13 02:20:43+00:00): 

Hey jaspinal, please review your changes. It seems you mass-edited those cycle paths. A lot of ways which should be either footway=crossings or cycleway=crossing are now falsely tagged as footway=sidewalk.

Please take more care while editing in the future and review each element one-by-one.
aighes (2026-01-13 02:22:00+00:00): You might as well join the discussion on: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/sidewalk-on-cyclepath/138915/18
Ltrlg (2026-01-12 17:53:21+00:00): Il y a un « ou » dans le nom ou bien ce sont plusieurs noms distincts pour le même bâtiment ? Si ce sont des noms distincts, il faut déterminer le nom principal pour name=* et utiliser alt_name=* pour le nom secondaire. (Et si c’est juste un nom étrange, laisser un note=* pour le suivant peut être une bonne idée.)

D’autre part en l’état le sport=table_tennis ne correspond à rien, c’est juste un bâtiment ?
sanzay (2026-01-13 22:11:48+00:00): Merci pour ta remarque , j'ai précisé la nature du batiment et supprimer le nom usage " Ramon" issu du club des Loups
Norbert Dichter (2026-01-12 16:07:48+00:00): Hello, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. Thank you for your contribution. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. Or just hit the Q-key.
Also please keep in mind: many buildings are very close but do not actually touch each other, try to map them close to each other without letting them connect or share nodes with each other, roads, or residential area outlines. In the iD web editor, holding down the "alt" key will keep nodes from "snapping" to each other and accidentally connecting.  Thanks so much for your contribution, Norbert 'Nodi' Dichter, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177144334
NeisBot (2026-01-17 15:30:08+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13450617434 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Appliance repair service in Colorado Springs"
---
Например, более нейтральная и фактическая версия вашего текста могла бы быть: "Сервис ремонта бытовой техники в Колорадо-Спрингс"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-25 07:36:43+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177671092
(No visible changes after review)
Frans S (2026-01-21 12:15:31+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
Issues found on your mappings
A: Inaccurate mapping. 

B: Overlapping buildings.
C: Collected adjacent buildings and mapped it as 1 building.
E: Buildings not squared or rounded.

G: Included the shadow of the building.
H: Included a yard of clearing.


Explanation can be found in this document which  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177144643
Frans S (2026-01-21 12:17:08+00:00): Buildings can be mapped with 4, 6 or 8 nodes. The way you mapped them is not as they are actual build,
Always square the rectangular buildings !
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177144643
Langlaeufer (2026-01-13 07:41:39+00:00): Auch wenn es keine regulären Zufahrten sind könnten die eingebetteten Schienen als Rettungszufahrten dienen.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177144674
Marvk (2026-01-13 09:19:36+00:00): Hi Langlaufer, guter Punkt. Ich würde den highway mit highway=service + service=emergency_access wieder hinzufügen. Klingt das für dich passend?
Langlaeufer (2026-01-13 10:20:43+00:00): Da ich keine Ahnung hab wie die Wege wirklich genutzt werden bzw welche Nutzung vorgesehen ist, kann ich dazu nichts sagen. Ich würde dir das so glauben
Marvk (2026-01-13 10:29:30+00:00): Dort verlaufen zwei Tramschienen eingebettet in eine gepflasterte Straße, ausgeschildert ist dort Durchfahrt verboten mit Zusatzschild 1024-16 Straßenbahn frei.
IreuN (2026-01-15 10:19:48+00:00): Siemka, fotoradar już jest na stronie CANARD, dodałem ref do OSM ;)
d3mol3k (2026-01-17 09:41:39+00:00): dzięki, wrócę z delegacji to zobaczę co dalej. Fajnie jak by ktoś dodał położenie znaków drogowych po obu stronach od radaru ;)
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-08 07:32:58+00:00): Removed SEO spam and cleaned up other tags for POI in changeset 183813326

https://osm.org/changeset/183813326
Ltrlg (2026-01-14 06:43:23+00:00): node/13254561662 était bien présent lors de mon passage hier matin. Je n’ai probablement pas bien classifié, mais il existe.
Sébastien Chopin (2026-01-14 09:04:48+00:00): Effectivement, je me souviens qu’il y est. Je cherchais une «statue» ou «memorial» de ce genre. Il s’agit bien d’une plaque «citation».
 Je viens de chercher dans le wiki une meilleure dénomination que «Plaque commémorative» … en vain. Laissons donc ce que tu avais mis.
Ltrlg (2026-01-14 10:29:01+00:00): 👍
eggie (2026-01-12 18:21:58+00:00): Dag SJ.. Probeer svp concreet commentaar toe te voegen bij je uploads.

Mvg
eggie
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-03 07:36:03+00:00): Reverted SEO spam changing name and address of existing POI without changing location or top-level tags

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183578235
epigen108 (2026-05-10 19:54:55+00:00): Du hattest https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13450715222 mit einem Fixme versehen gehabt. Ich habe das vorhin vor Ort angeschaut, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5286959
NeisBot (2026-01-17 15:30:11+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13450661059 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Financial services in Brașov"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-25 07:36:45+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177671094
(Cleaned up leftovers from previous edits)
mcliquid (2026-01-17 08:13:57+00:00): Hi, wieso lässt du solche Einträge nicht einfach raus?
phone	+43 ...  (falls bekannt)
website	https://...  (falls vorhanden)

Was soll der "Platzhalter" bzw. welchen Mehrwert bietet dieser aus deiner Sicht?
mcliquid (2026-01-17 08:17:34+00:00): name=Tränkstelle
Das ist kein Name
fs_LT (2026-02-13 09:31:42+00:00): sorry, aber solche Tags finde ich auch sinnbefreit: phone +43 ... (falls bekannt)
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-03 14:55:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 185044755, 185044712, 185044792, 185043031, 185044858, 185044854, 185044726, 185044802, 185044684, 185044693, 185043064, 185044766, 185044834, 185044779, 185043050, 185044776, 185043074, 185043054, 185044732, 185043091, 185044704, 185044746, 185044715, 185043085, 185044894, 185044810, 185044795, 185044765, 185044862, 185043059, 185044750, 185044758, 185043076, 185044812, 185044785, 185043015, 185043039, 185044823, 185044748, 185044738, 185044744, 185044734, 185044845, 185044702, 185044835, 185044888, 185044873, 185044731, 185044879, 185044817, 185044827, 185044789, 185044865, 185044720, 185044843, 185043045, 185044839, 185044849, 185044771, 185044694, 185044768, 185044707, 185043066 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed and buggy imports in Ivory Coast
kapazao (2026-01-31 14:18:53+00:00): Hola, por favor trata de usar etiquetado correcto para los elementos editados y si tienes dudas siempre puedes dejar nota y preguntar o consultar la wiki de OSM.

He corregido la vía https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/178463410, ya que tenía varios errores.

Un saludo
Szymson (2026-01-12 16:54:17+00:00): Proszę zapoznać się z:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/chce-dodac-swoja-firme-do-mapy-w-osm-watek-ogolny/135487
i poprawić ten zestaw zmian