piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-28 12:59:33+00:00): Jak rozumiem po https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1299153305/history i innych nie ma jakichkolwiek śladów?
Dawid2849 (2026-02-28 19:21:28+00:00): Nie ma śladów
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-03-02 09:44:59+00:00): wycofane

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179245150
tyfi (2024-07-05 01:21:20+00:00): Also added a piece of Cinque Hommes Creek with a ford through PCR 501
tyfi (2024-07-05 01:21:27+00:00): via USGSHydroCached
tyfi (2024-07-05 01:21:55+00:00): The name Schindler Road appears contained to Perryville.
tyfi (2024-07-05 01:22:35+00:00): Also added and fixed up a bunch of private driveways connected to 501
Kovoschiz (2024-07-05 04:03:58+00:00): I don't see what you are doing, and you removed `name:en=`
citrula (2024-07-05 03:31:12+00:00): Can you explain what the "Major Edit" you made here is, exactly?
tyfi (2024-07-05 03:10:05+00:00): Tiger had some inconsistent classification and access permissions
tyfi (2024-07-05 03:14:30+00:00): Also fixed up PCR 536 which is a small spur off of 534, and I added lakes and driveways
tastrax (2024-07-05 07:05:09+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, +61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
Mashin (2024-07-05 14:54:42+00:00): Hi!
Please before you change road classification, talk to the community so the edits won't mess up the original classification effort.

Cheers

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Connecticut/Highway_classification
gpserror (2024-07-05 12:41:25+00:00): Could you respond to  https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4320005 - is there a better way to tag this?
stst415 (2024-07-05 13:45:43+00:00): Yes, there is.  I grew up in San Rafael and we always called this unincorporated neighborhood California Park or just Cal Park.  It's here too in Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Park,_California?wprov=sfti1
gpserror (2024-07-05 15:03:27+00:00): Cool, just wanted to verify since the anonymous user did bring up a point:
Usually administrative boundaries means there's an administration or some form of low level government, so perhaps this label might not be best, alas, I don't know what's the best way or maybe this is fine, but just wanted to make sure.
stst415 (2024-07-05 15:27:26+00:00): Ahh, gotcha.  I wasn't clear if the anonymous comment was yours or not.  Anyway, think of this unincorporated area as being similar to Marin City which, despite its name, is similarly not a city, but another unincorporated area that is administered by the county of Marin.  Cheers!  👍
gpserror (2024-07-05 17:11:12+00:00): It was indeed someone else but brought up a very good point.  I'm not familiar with California unincorporated areas but things but most of the unincorporated pseudo-cities Colorado don't have administrative boundaries since they were always ad-hoc.  It's weird that California Park had a boundary which implies there is some government but if it's arbitrarily added to if some land owner says so, then there's really no boundary...
gpserror (2024-07-05 17:14:55+00:00): BTW, if interested or for fun, search for Hygiene, Colorado - that's how I'd expect an unincorporated area gets mapped since there's no real boundary that tells who needs to pay taxes or not.  They even have a fire department and a post office...
stst415 (2024-07-05 17:25:54+00:00): It's different in different areas.  In L.A., for example, we have unincorporated Altadena whoch has very clearly defined administrative borders, and we have unincorporated Acton which are vague. 🤷‍♂️
Davie Dean (2024-07-07 09:53:38+00:00): Hi again maps@uq. Thanks for the update on the name. However, I went past here today, and this building (or at least the building that was here) isn't here anymore, so I changed it to demolished. If you know there is a new building going in here, feel free to put it back as under construction.
ivanbranco (2024-07-13 09:53:14+00:00): Hi WieKo68,

imho if you don't know a value is okay to not add such tag. E.g. wikimedia_commons=x, wikidata=-- or ref:inspire=-
rskedgell (2024-07-05 08:13:23+00:00): I suspect you'll find a few more of those in that general area, by the same user. They don't seem to reply to changeset comments, but they do appear to respond by changing how they map objects.
BCNorwich (2024-07-05 10:37:33+00:00): Hi rskedgell, 
I did comment to that effect on their changeset, maybe they'll have a go at me.

regards Bernard.
cubbe8 (2024-07-05 05:34:08+00:00): According to OSM wiki, Storrow Drive qualifies as a motorway.
KiloThree (2024-07-05 15:59:46+00:00): Does it? It's not a limited access road https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=motorway?uselang=en-GB
Joseph R P (2024-08-05 20:48:01+00:00): I have reverted Storrow Drive from motorway back to its original trunk classification. It has characteristics you would find on a controlled-access highway, but it isn't a freeway. Its speed limit is only 40 and has some sections with sidewalks and at-grade street/driveway access.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154868242
mikefalzon (2025-03-01 17:31:25+00:00): Really! This is a prison!
Flamen_Sru (2025-03-04 11:14:38+00:00): Hi mikefalzon , Thank you for feedback. I will analyze situation and get back to you.
Flamen_Sru (2025-03-05 11:22:22+00:00): Hi mikefalzon,
Thank you for your feedback, I have made the corrections.
mikefalzon (2025-03-07 18:11:43+00:00): Thanks!
SomeoneElse (2024-08-24 12:47:27+00:00): Hello,
You've removed an access tag from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/143092566/history - how could you tell from aerial imagery?
Best Regards,
Andy
magrej (2024-08-26 09:58:30+00:00): Hi Andy,
I made that decision based on the cars that are visible on Bing aerial imagery. Motor vehicle=no suggests that it is restricted for all vehicles. Maybe access=private would be more appropriate, similar to the service road already tagged like that on the neighboring West farm.

Cheers,
magrej
SomeoneElse (2024-08-26 10:12:42+00:00): "access=private" does make sense here, so I've added it.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/SomeoneElse/diary/404748 does look at "likely access tags where not declared" and for track (and service is similar) "private" is the likely correct value in England and Wales, unless there's a designation or other information suggesting any different.
nevw (2024-07-05 09:58:07+00:00): Hi, I think Miltiadis Street name ends at the start of the part leading to the driveway for the industrial units.
There is a gate at the beginning of the driveway around the industrial units.
I have removed the name from the driveway.
nevw (2024-07-05 09:59:13+00:00): All of the units also carry the tag addr:street=Miltiadis Street
NorthCrab_upload (2024-07-05 06:20:15+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/217192037

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Leo Slager (2024-07-05 22:25:58+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
I22PPUTT0O (2024-07-07 21:21:10+00:00): Bedankt voor de tips
pangoSE (2024-10-18 06:42:16+00:00): är community ret specialitet? det är den enda i sverige just nu. jag brukar använda general för vårdcentraler.
Jnrf (2024-10-20 18:06:13+00:00): Det är ingen vanlig vårdcentral. Det är en vårdcentral specifikt för personer som lever i hemlöshet, inte en som vilka som helst kan komma til. 

Regionens sprutbyte finns också här, men det har jag ingen aning om hur man skall tagga. Det närmaste blir vending_machine:syringes, men det är inte riktigt det heller.

Har ändrat så att det är en vanlig vårdcentral, men la till social_facility:for=homeless.
silversurfer83 (2024-07-05 12:46:30+00:00): Warum? Laut WP ist die Gemeinde Mühlhausen im Täle und Todsburg ist ein Teil davon. 
Abgesehen davon ist die Schreibweise wohl Todtsburg
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153574075
lberges (2024-07-05 13:17:26+00:00): Todsburg ist schon korrekt, der Ort heißt auf der Karte auch so. Auch in den Verzeichnissen der Post steht der Name, und z.B. hier Anlage_01_3a_Erlaeuterungsbericht_Teil_03-2.pdf
In der Nähe liegt die Todtsburger Höhle, die schreibt sich mit "dt". (nicht der einzige Fehler in WP)
lberges (2024-07-05 13:21:46+00:00): Der Name der Gemeinde ist nicht immer der richtige Name für die Adresse. Da gibt es zahllose Ausnahmen. Vgl. Diskussion von und mit Flohoff im Forum: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/building-yes-immer-mit-addr-street/93791/16
AntMadeira (2024-07-05 11:02:31+00:00): Olá, m2fc.
Reparei que refizeste totalmente este cruzamento.
Podes indicar em que é que a versão atual está melhor ou mais simples do que a anterior?
Aconselho-te a consultar a página de padronização de estradas, nomeadamente a nota no fundo da tabela intitulada "Divisão das estradas por sentido".
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Portugal/Padroniza%C3%A7%C3%A3o#Estradas

Qualquer dúvida estou ao dispor.

Cumprimentos,
António Madeira.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153574209
m2fc (2024-07-05 11:07:15+00:00): a anterior não tinha as faixas centrais de viragem nem as da direita das estradas de serviço. agora está de acordo como os outros cruzamentos perto dessa zona como o centro empresarial e o das pontes.
m2fc (2024-07-05 11:41:23+00:00): "Em certos casos, é aceitável dividir longitudinalmente uma faixa de rodagem se houver uma ilha pintada de largura e comprimento consideráveis e que dividam claramente duas vias."
Existe uma ilha pintada (sem separadores físicos) nos dois extremos que encurtam ao centro para dar lugar às vias de viragem do centro da estrada, agora se é de largura considerável não sei mas parece-me que faz mais sentido assim dado que a ideia original do OSM é mapear tudo, mantendo dentro dos limites de padronização, claro. Se alguém tiver mais opiniões, que as mencione e se necessário reverta ou faça as alterações necessárias.
AntMadeira (2024-07-05 11:42:45+00:00): Se tivesses dado um pouco de atenção ao que estava feito, terias visto que as faixas e restrições de viragem estavam todas mapeadas corretamente, sem necessidade desta complexidade de pontos e linhas.
Assim como está neste momento, é como se houvesse quatro estradas paralelas na EN 10, quando só tens uma.
Os outros cruzamentos da zona também estão mal mapeados. Este foi alterado para servir de exemplo para que outros mapeadores pudessem corrigir os cruzamentos desta área.
Para mais informações, dúvidas, sugestões ou críticas, aconselho-te a entrares no canal Telegram do OSM Portugal, onde está o grosso da comunidade portuguesa:
https://t.me/OSMPortugal

Cumprimentos,
António Madeira.
AntMadeira (2024-07-05 11:44:35+00:00): Esclarecendo: as ilhas pintadas, neste caso, não configuram separação de vias, pois existem outras opções disponíveis que são facilmente implementadas. As ilhas pintadas só servem de divisão quando não há outra opção, devido à complexidade de certos cruzamentos (casos raros que servem de exceção à regra).

Cumprimentos,
António.
aTarom (2024-07-05 17:00:51+00:00): Hola, bienvenido y gracias por editar, sustituyo
en
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1299179844/history
el
addr:housenumber=SN
por
nohousenumber=yes
dispones de más info en
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:nohousenumber
cualquier problema o duda puedes participar en los canales de la comunidad en
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/es/51
Gracias de nuevo por participar y feliz mapeo!!!
VictorIE (2025-08-09 09:23:21+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/300244115/history

I have separated the shop and the petrol station.

Why does this mention 2 oil companies - Corrib Oil  and Texaco?
CAI Stabia (2024-07-05 07:39:24+00:00): Please, avoid deleting paths. At our latitude, due to the sunny weather, in summer time, minor and less used paths are likely to be overgrown. Not so in winter/spring time. 
Please use the trail visibility instead
tordans (2024-07-05 07:19:33+00:00): Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4283577 für Details
JeroenHoek (2024-07-05 07:55:35+00:00): Zou je dit advies eens door willen lezen?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Misschien Thiskal ook even erbij betrekken als je iets ziet wat niet klopt in de vorige versie van het object.
DorneyLake123 (2024-07-05 08:13:24+00:00): Using OSM Deep History I can see the changeset added +[natural=water] and removed -[place=sea].
Taya_S (2024-07-05 08:49:03+00:00): I have reverted this changeset. That is not a correct change. The Northsea was already correctly tagged as place=sea. It should not be tagged as natural=water because it is already outside of the coastline. And as JeroenHoek said, please use better changeset comments. Changeset comments like "Texel" or "Noordzee" do not tell others what this changeset is about.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153578028
Warin61 (2024-07-06 02:11:08+00:00): Hi,
Welcome to OSM!

For information... multipolygon outer ways cannot share segments. 
Relation 17806381 has been deleted. What were the outer ways are now tagged building=retail. 

The bing imagery looks to have an offset to the OSM mapped roads by 5 metres..
jeslop (2024-07-11 08:37:30+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153813591
jeslop (2024-07-11 08:38:45+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

Saludos.

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
4004 (2024-07-08 00:07:56+00:00): по церкви соглашусь, хотя тут скорее диалект. но каплица, это точно имя собственное, а не просто описание?
berndw (2024-07-05 09:31:48+00:00): Ich setze zur Erinnerung einen Hinweis.
Tjuro (2024-07-05 18:10:46+00:00): Hallo Wim Pruij,

Welkom bij OpenStreetMap,

Goed om te zien dat je je eerste edit gemaakt hebt.

Voor meer informatie over OSM kan je de wiki raadplegen. Hoewel deze niet altijd overeen komt met de werkelijkheid kan je er veel informatie uit krijgen, zie:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing
Voor meer info over crossings.

Veel plezier met mappen.

Met vriendelijke groet,

Tjuro
RicoElectrico (2024-11-11 16:10:05+00:00): Cześć, w takim przypadku wybierasz, że nie ma nazwy. Patrz https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4338346
joost schouppe (2024-07-08 12:51:20+00:00): Have you considered using the import procedure? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Belgium/Building_and_address_import/Instructions and https://buildings.osm.be/
NeisBot (2024-07-05 08:12:38+00:00): Hi Grand Site du Cirque de Navacelles_OFFICIEL, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 99% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 9 highway(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=153576575
Grand Site du Cirque de Navacelles_OFFICIEL (2024-07-05 08:47:10+00:00): Hi, 
Yes these deletions were intentionals. Our organization is in charge of the protection of this vast natural area. The sector where we deleted several ways is property of a farmer we work with, and he has encountered difficulties with visitors scaring the livestock.
Moreover, this region is home to a unique biodiversity and some areas have restricted access in order to avoid human disturbance (vultures, golden eagle ...)
Thanks for your understanding and cooperation
Claudio Tam (2024-07-05 08:16:23+00:00): ways:
• not a building
• the most significant aspect is waterway, not ruins
• tagged with ruins:waterway=canal and ruins:bridge=aqueduct
=====
areas:
• not a building
• the most significant aspect is historical ruins
• tagged with historic=aqueduct and ruins=aqueduct
Allroads (2024-07-05 10:35:53+00:00): Hoi,

Je tagt hier barrier=gate op een way.
Beter is om ook de kruisingsnode met de way te taggen met barrier=gate.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dgate
NorthCrab_upload (2024-07-05 08:40:21+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/165081455

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Đuro Jiří (2024-07-14 17:32:04+00:00): Cosa significa "a"?
jeslop (2024-07-05 08:54:22+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153578247
jeslop (2024-07-05 08:54:23+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153578247
LockOnGuy (2024-07-05 09:51:56+00:00): Stop this vandalism now! I already replied in the recent one in     
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153538001     
And     
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153538091      
Do not delete the nodes or name without prior discussion.
LockOnGuy (2024-07-05 09:57:18+00:00): And keep in mind, I did not reply to that reply of yours because it was disrespectful and you should watch your language.      
Just like the message you sent on Telegram that was full of cuss and profanity.     
So stop this behavior now.
Kamil Kalata (2024-07-05 08:49:44+00:00): Ortofotomapa czasowa użyta w tym zestawie zmian składała się ze zdjęć aktualnych w dniu 1 listopada 2020 roku.
jeslop (2024-07-05 08:54:24+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153578247
obache (2024-08-14 08:19:01+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1262402398

この道の部分は下中野平井線の工事による道の付け替えで通れなくなっていたので、abandoned:highway=unclassified に変更していたのですが、highway=residential にした根拠は何でしょうか。

今日通るときに見てみましたが、相変わらず閉鎖されているように見えました。
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-13 03:23:02+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164878198
aTarom (2024-07-05 15:43:11+00:00): Hello, thanks for editing, the peak has been moved but its height has not been updated, I understand that in the Spanish IGN raster layer its location is not correct?
Cheers
Laurent Jerry (2024-07-05 17:09:57+00:00): Hello,
I found of Opentopomap that the summit was far away from the highest isopleths, despite the correct altitude. I tried to correct it as well as possible with the help of aerial photographies.
arte2002 (2024-07-05 21:43:56+00:00): En este caso es muy difícil o imposible poner la cumbre visualmente, es mejor utilizar la capa raster del IGN

Solo como consulta personal muchos tracks terminan donde apunta el ING

Sería conveniente revertir los datos

Translated
In this case it is very difficult or impossible to put the summit visually, it is better to use the IGN raster layer

Just as a personal consultation, many tracks end where the ING points

It would be convenient to reverse the data
Maria Kiesel (2024-07-05 09:32:51+00:00): Dieses Reisebüro ist nicht geschlossen!
ntzm (2024-11-30 10:40:53+00:00): What is the reason for turning this from a track to a service road?
magrej (2024-12-02 14:49:00+00:00): Hi ntzm, thanks for your feedback!

It contained the tag motor_vehicle=designated and a few cars are visible on the available imagery. Being tagged as a track it automatically wasn't routable for certain vehicles.

Since Sheffield is the area you're familiar with, feel free to make any changes accordingly.

Cheers,
magrej
gurglypipe (2024-07-12 12:45:10+00:00): Heya, thanks for adding this detail around the Ulverston channel.

What was the source of the data?

I ask because mapping the rocks as rectangular areas seems a bit unnatural, and if I look at Bing imagery, rocks like Sea Wood Scar actually look like a single rock 150m away from the area that you’ve mapped. Am I looking at the right thing?

Thanks
meteorquake (2024-07-12 14:48:35+00:00): Hello! I think you mean Black Scars... I was looking for some of the land points people were using in describing walks across the sands such as to the chapel, and found they weren't on the map. I noticed them on old maps at the NLS map site although I couldn't tell how much was above the sands they are nowadays, but because people were referencing them I've put them in, without much certainty of shape. I drew a long narrow area here because the old maps had them spread (gappily) across a long narrow area, but I probably made it smaller to reflect uncertainty about how they are seen now.
gurglypipe (2024-07-18 08:32:04+00:00): I mean Black Scars as well, but I was specifically referring to Sea Wood Scar (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1299232863) when looking at the single rock 150m away on aerial imagery. :)

I understand what you are trying to achieve, thanks for taking the time to add this detail. It’s tricky to interpret old maps!

If you’re uncertain about the shape of things, I suggest it’s probably best to represent them as a node or way, rather than an area, and then that uncertainty is represented in the mapping, rather than a false accuracy coming from using an area.

You might find some more information on geograph: I can’t find anything for Black Scars or Sea Wood Scar, but Wadhead Scar comes up with some results (https://www.geograph.org.uk/search.php?i=211699742) which could help refine that.
meteorquake (2024-07-18 10:03:34+00:00): I'll see if I can give it a better shape. I was down there the other day. I think my main problem is trying to understand what a scar actually is in order to give it the right outline - the definition I've seen is an exposed cliff, whereas what I see at the places called scars are horizontal rocks... maybe they are the tops of small cliffs that have been filled up to the top with the sands...
gurglypipe (2024-07-18 10:29:50+00:00): Thanks. Yeah, your definition of scar matches my understanding. Small cliffs which have since been partially covered up would make sense.
Artasen (2024-07-21 14:40:18+00:00): An inland scar is defined as exposed cliffs of limestone particularly in  in many valleys in the Yorkshire Dales however coastal scars were defined in a geology paper as  Limestone beds below the mean sea level, the largest pothole in the submerged area, or an isolated boulder. Hope this helps.
Đuro Jiří (2024-07-07 19:34:03+00:00): Ciao fra76mm,
posso sapere perché hai cancellato pista ciclabile sulla Via Giacomo Matteotti?
fra76mm (2024-07-08 06:35:06+00:00): Ciao, perché la pista era già stata correttamente mappata come cycleway:right=lane cioè come pista sulla sede stradale, non su un percorso separato, come invece è sul tratto oltre la XIX traversa
antonr (2024-07-27 11:09:42+00:00): Hvorfor har du slettet de opdateringer jeg omhyggeligt og baseret på survey tilføjede i https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151866873?

Jeg foreslår at du ruller hele dette ændringssæt tilbage. Så kommer kortet til at svare til virkeligheden igen :-)

PS Hvis nu du skrev en bedre kommentar til dit ændringssæt, der forklarer dine bevæggrunde, ville jeg måske ikke behøve at spørge. "Tilføjelser/rettelser - Vestjylland" er fuldstændigt intetsigende, hvis ikke vildledende. Så vidt jeg ved falder dette område sædvanligvis under under Østjylland. Du kunne fx have skrevet: "Sejs - Østjylland. Sletter nogle nyligt tilføjede veje, der ikke kan ses på de uddaterede luftfotos" eller hvad der nu afspejler din tankegang...
nevw (2024-07-05 09:46:08+00:00): Hi, these buildings should all have addr:housenumber=159A and the unit number of each should be entered in addr:unit=x for each of the units.
I have fixed this and added the driveway.
Warin61 (2024-07-07 01:29:17+00:00): Hi,
The multipolygon relation for the picnic site does not meet the 'multipolygon rules'. I have deleted the relation. Made the south western area into the camping area, and thee north eastern area into the picnic area. See what you think?