piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
IanRsch (2026-05-01 11:15:02+00:00): Felipe, lo que has hecho en el Conjunto de Cambios 180177789 no es una corrección, sino una degradación masiva de datos. Eliminar 157 polígonos que representaban la volumetría real de las viviendas, que me tomo ene tiempo, para reemplazarlos por nodos es una falta de respeto y una pérdida de información geográfica injustificable. Tu afirmación de que "así se hace en Chile" es una falacia; los estándares de mapeo siempre priorizan las áreas sobre los puntos cuando la fuente es precisa, especialmente en zonas urbanas densas.

Me borraste de nuevo perímetros y las etiquetas de unidad, has borrado una zona de alta precisión en un cúmulo de pines genéricos con el número 4160 que destruyen la utilidad del mapa para servicios de emergencia, delivery, uber, empresas de servicios basicos y sanitarios, impuestos, empresas de internet, etc. 

Además, no es la primera vez que haces esto. Borrar información valiosa y degradar áreas a nodos para simplificar tu trabajo bajo el hashtag #Kaart es algo que solo empobrece el mapa. Si tu intención es "corregir", mejora lo existente en lugar de eliminar el trabajo ajeno para inflar tus estadísticas de edición.
felipeeugenio (2026-05-01 15:34:22+00:00): Por favor, revisar respuestas de maperos involucrados en Telegram.
Saludos
woodpeck (2026-05-02 08:12:14+00:00): DWG here. Please do not take important discussions offline into commercial silos (Telegram) where they are not properly visible for other mappers and not recorded. Please ALWAYS discuss the merits (or not) of changesets in the changeset discussions, and if a larger discussion is needed, use the community forum. You are of course free to discuss anything on Telegram *additionally* but never try to move a public discussion away from here to Telegram.
felipeeugenio (2026-05-02 12:35:43+00:00): Hello Frederik. 

The discussion was moved to Telegram by Ian himself, who posted a variation of this text there, and people started reacting to it. So, I thought answering here was redundant and counterproductive, since in Telegram, pictures of Ian's mapping were shown as evidence that most of his mapping in plain wrong and he manages to, inadvertently I think, do the very same things that he claims to be a victim of. Not to mention the respect with which he addresses me and the assumptions he made which are false.

regards
jptolosa (2026-05-02 21:10:06+00:00): Hola Ian, no se ha destruido ninguna información de la que agregaste (direcciones y números de casa). Quizá el render no es el que desearías que fuese, por eso se muestra repetidamente el número 4160. Solamente se corrigió los errores que cometiste que fueron muchos. Pero también necesitamos que tengas una postura colaborativa y no confrontacional, para que podamos aportar juntos a mejorar el mapa.
Saludos.
NeisBot (2026-03-20 21:03:48+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13474436490 v4

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Tattoo shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-06 07:23:13+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags/values in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/185179576
Erwin Wailland (2026-03-21 18:00:16+00:00): Achtung hier gibt es ein Problem nach dieser Änderung mit dem Routing nördlich der Korrektur Höhe Dr. Heschl-Weg stadtauswärts bis Webling Verteilerkreis. Hier wird nicht über Kärntnerstraße geroutet. Bitte kontrollieren. Danke
thopf (2026-03-23 21:49:45+00:00): Danke für die Information!

Ich habe schon die Abbiegebeschränkungen-Relationen repariert, da scheint etwas falsch eingestellt gewesen zu sein. Mittlerweile müsste das Routing wieder funktionieren. LG.
thopf (2026-03-23 21:54:48+00:00): Anmerkung: Bei längeren Strecken im Routing dauert es etwas länger, bis die Router, aufgrund des Rechenaufwandesn auf die neue Situation reagieren. Es können also weiterhin Fehler auftreten, die erst in den nächsten Tagen verschwinden werden.
LG.
NeisBot (2026-03-20 21:36:49+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/908561596 v4

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Farm supply store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-28 23:33:29+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180562910
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
crushtheserpent (2026-03-20 21:38:14+00:00): also added demolished:building tags where necessary
literan (2026-03-25 13:29:33+00:00): осталось дофига брошенных точек без тегов, например https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3437967552
mini-me (2026-03-25 13:47:52+00:00): Упс.. сейчас откачу
BrummsLee (2026-03-21 10:47:06+00:00): Hallo Oberlausitzer42!
Würdest du die Bearbeitungen nun bitte endlich einmal so lassen, wie sie waren?
Dein "Haus Stille (unbewohnt)" hatte ich schon in die Beschreibung verschoben. Da ist es gut aufgehoben. Ansonsten kommt in Name nur der Name des Hauses.
Es interessiert hier keinen, ob das Haus nun bewohnt ist oder leer steht! OSM ist eine Datenbank und kein Buchungsportal!
iandees (2026-03-20 23:13:37+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9077763795 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180181366, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
Fraxi (2026-03-21 09:18:10+00:00): Здравей! Преместих openstreetmap.org/node/13665779015 и сивите контейнери до тях на по-вероятна локация(вкл. и според MAF снимките). Моля да потвърдиш.
sa62 (2026-03-21 17:14:59+00:00): Здравей, 
Контейнерите реално са откъм западния тротоар на Черковна, но самата улица е отбелязана прекалено на Запад и в момента се пада върху тротара в тази отсечка. Съответно по сателитни снимки вмомента контейнерите са на правилното място, но позицията им спрямо улицата не е.
Fraxi (2026-03-21 18:14:17+00:00): Така е улицата трябва да се намести в близкото бъдеще. Просто ми се искаше да потвърдиш, понеже си бил там. Благодаря!
eggie (2026-03-21 07:25:09+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-03-21 06:37:01+00:00): Hoi,
lanes=0 verwijderd.
Beter in die wijkjes de lanes weglaten. Die zijn voor andere situaties bedoeld. lanes=0 kan fysiek niet.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-03-21 06:48:11+00:00): Stuk Hermelijn verwijderd. Dat is een groenstrook. 
https://viewer.satellietdataportaal.nl/@51.60538,5.327731,18/?datastrip=20260302_SVNEO-04&sensorname=SuperView-NEO
Jordi MF (2026-03-20 23:29:35+00:00): Hola Joaquinpegil,
Gracias por mejorar OSM.
Tengo una duda sobre la siguiente via: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/218791303/
He visto que la has cambiado de "track" (pista) a "path" (senda). ¿El Ayuntamiento la ha reconvertido en una senda y ya no pueden transitar vehículos? Con la etiqueta "path", los navegadores interpretan que solamente los peatones pueden transitar por aquí.
Gracias por resolver la duda.
Un saludo
eggie (2026-03-21 06:26:36+00:00): Dag Bertje,
Het is niet correct om nogmaals de adressen op de gebouwomrekken bij te taggen. Er zijn al adresnodes.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-03-21 06:30:17+00:00): reverted by changeset #180189082
BCNorwich (2026-03-24 07:52:45+00:00): Hi, Do your bridges Way: 1491098392 and Way: 1491098395 really exist? They don't seem to be crossing anything.

Regards Bernard.
Atanas Angelov (2026-03-24 17:41:18+00:00): They cross a drain line , so probably you are right and is not bridges
mueschel (2026-03-25 10:48:08+00:00): Hallo,
welchen Stecker gibt es hier an der Ladeestation? "Mennekes" ist eine Firma, die Dutzende verschiedene Stecker herstellt.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:socket:*
Savvas Hiker (2026-03-25 23:31:31+00:00): Review requested by mistake; no review needed.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-17 01:32:52+00:00): Revert changesets with nonsensical tagging, promotional content and/or prohibited source=* (Google) in changeset 184204962

https://osm.org/changeset/184204962
bxl-forever (2026-03-21 00:59:16+00:00): Hello, and thanks for this… update.

I see you are adding a lot of data related to energy production and infrastructure, but the only description of your changesets is "update" without any source.

Is this an import?

I understand that we can learn a lot from aerial imagery but to add "plant:output:electricity=6 MW" you probably obtained this information somewhere.  This is undoubtedly useful but where can all this data be checked?

Also, if you add or modify buildings in Belgium, could you please trace them from official government footprints, in this case Digitaal Vlaanderen GRB (available out of the box in JOSM), instead of distorted aerial imagery.

Thanks in advance.
iandees (2026-03-20 23:13:36+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9680979424 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180181364, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
Carto'Cité (2026-06-12 14:44:45+00:00): Bonjour Furdrien.

Créer un multipolygon à partir de ways qui n'ont aucune signification propre, comme tu l'as fait pour la gare de Us, est découragé. Je t'invite à lire le paragraphe "Remark" de la section https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multipolygon_Examples#Forest_with_2_lakes,_island,_boundary_and_highway_(Multiple_ways_forming_nested_multipolygons). 

Cette forme de topologie de pure factorisation n'est pas ici justifiée, comme elle peut l'être pour les limites administratives. Une emprise  de gare ne suit pas forcément le bord d'un quai ni d'un landuse. Cela rend la maintenance des données terriblement complexe, même sur JOSM pour un contributeur averti. Je n'ose pas imaginer la réaction d'un contributeur moins averti sur iD.

On peut en discuter sur le forum si tu le souhaites.
Antoine.
Furdrien (2026-06-14 12:31:59+00:00): Bonjour Antoine,
Merci pour ton message. Je comprends bien ce que tu veux dire, notamment pour les utilisateurs d’iD.
Effectivement, après avoir regardé à Pontoise, il y a la « platform » (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/683317917) qui est rattachée à la relation « Pontoise » (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3323188). Pour les petites gares, cette logique était moins évidente 😉
Je vais donc m’occuper de rattacher les deux parties de la gare d’Us (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20356161#map=18/49.099584/1.970558) et (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4460618#map=19/49.099722/1.970507), comme dans le modèle de Pontoise.
Bonne journée,
Furdrien
Gaelan Steele (2026-03-20 23:02:15+00:00): (er, chain)
BCNorwich (2026-03-22 06:27:18+00:00): Hi, Just to let you know that you are making lots of duplicated nodes. These are usually at the end of linear features like hedges. I've removed mant duplicate nodes in the last few days, five more today.

Regards Bernard.
NeisBot (2026-03-20 23:21:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 9 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1150489783 v4 | 4 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180181437
NieWnen (2026-06-09 20:31:27+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1491107603

tagowanie CPR jest nieco inne, używa się highway=path
Zachęcam do zapoznania się z wiki jak tagować ciągi pieszo-rowerowe:

osm.wiki/Pl:Rowery#Drogi_dla_pieszych_i_rower%C3%B3w


Choć z tego co widzę, to raczej powinien być zwykły chodnik? Wtedy tagi foot=* i bicycle=* są do usunięcia.
Kymon (2026-06-11 07:38:47+00:00): Tak, była pomyłka, a potem zmiana na chodnik, tagi zostały
mueschel (2026-03-21 09:41:45+00:00): Hi,
there are almost 1000 objects with a strange "Ardmore" tag. Could you check that?
jhuang97 (2026-03-21 12:53:22+00:00): Seems like I-76 was trying to fix the addr:city tags from an import in changeset 180171206, but might not have gotten it quite right...  Aside from the Ardmore=Ardmore tags, I also think things like bus routes (relation 8721762) don't need the addr:state=PA tag since it otherwise doesn't have an address.
I-76 (2026-03-21 17:24:19+00:00): Yeah, damn. The addr:state=PA was 10 items that I thought had other addr: tags but were missing it, but I guess not. I'll check the Ardmore=Ardmore ones and fix that, but @mueschel said there are 1000 with something like this tag, but the database says ~140...

Thanks for helping me correct my mistakes guys
I-76 (2026-03-21 17:30:48+00:00): Nevermind, I see that there are 916 or so. Removed. Hopefully solved
confusedbuffalo (2026-03-21 08:54:25+00:00): Hi, thanks for adding detail here, but you seem to have added several duplicate phone numbers that were already mapped using the contact: scheme
e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10553314712
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/266493096
etc.
Try to check for this, because there could be other places where conflicting data is added
whammo (2026-03-26 10:16:06+00:00): Thanks for flagging, this has been fixed!
Justin1234 (2026-03-27 20:29:56+00:00): You changed a contact:facebook tag from "
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180182852
Justin1234 (2026-03-27 20:43:51+00:00): (The page lagged and i accidentally hit Post)

You changed a contact:facebook tag to "ptlrikin@gmail.com", emails should go into "email" or "contact:email" fields instead
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180182852
ftcat (2026-03-21 06:02:23+00:00): Hi VisibleSouth,

The D152, up to the junction with RD151 and RD481 is named the Leopards Hill Road. It gets its name from the old Leopards Hill Ranch. The homestead of the ranch, now a clinic, was at the base of the hill (Leopards Hill) at the junction of these roads. The area that expats and people living there call Leopards Hill is actually the suburb of New Kasama. Everything takes its name from the name of the road, including the cemetery. Google Maps not withstanding, the D152 runs from the boundary of what was Kabulonga Township, now the suburb of Kabulonga, to the the Leopards Hill Ranch homestead, not the junction of Addis Abba Drive and the Great East at Manda Hill.
B252697 (2026-03-21 01:12:33+00:00): The building and facility is already there, but it is undergoing enhancements work till Q2 2026, which should be soon! Around April to June

https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/temporary-arena-kallang-world-aquatics-championships-enhancement-works-sports-5577956

There is no Car Park G there already.
mrpenner (2026-03-21 02:04:00+00:00): Thanks for your contributions! Those parking lots should only be mapped as an area, you do not need to also put a node in the middle. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180183076
WaddleIsGood77 (2026-03-21 18:31:19+00:00): Thank you! I’m new to OSM, have only made a couple edits but I’m traveling here and wanted to fix up the map a bit. Thanks for the tip!
NeisBot (2026-03-21 01:30:47+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/2552419856 v7

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Office building"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisAgent (2026-03-21 05:33:20+00:00): 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again?
SuborbitalPigeon (2026-05-29 16:34:25+00:00): Reverted.
SuborbitalPigeon (2026-05-29 16:36:41+00:00): May I also add, thanks for making the world a worse place to live in, you freeloading scum.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-22 11:55:15+00:00): You tell 'em @SuborbitalPigeon . I give these spammers every bit as much respect and good faith as they give the community.

They also changed the address here, without either moving the node or keeping the existing address. I reverted that change as well in changeset 184428660

https://osm.org/changeset/184428660
NeisBot (2026-03-21 01:54:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 14 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1491121368 v1 | 12 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180183390
NeisBot (2026-03-21 02:00:49+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13665995504 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Apartamento turístico"
---
Por ejemplo, una versión más neutral y objetiva de tu texto podría ser: "Apartamento turístico"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-29 04:33:04+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180566273
(Delete spam tags. First version)
Agata1972 (2026-03-29 04:51:36+00:00): No entiendo que cambio dices
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-29 06:37:53+00:00): Muchas gracias por su respuesta. Le informamos que el cambio ya ha sido realizado, por lo que no necesita hacer nada más. Saludos cordiales.
Agata1972 (2026-03-29 06:51:46+00:00): No me di cuenta del error, gracias por corregirlo
mueschel (2026-03-22 09:11:59+00:00): Hi,
there are some mistakes with this import. 

- where can we find the mandatory import documentation?
- is the data available under a license compatible with OSM?
- the socket tags you use are not to be used. Please check the wiki for the correct tags


This import should be reverted and then redone following the proper procedures.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
NeisBot (2026-03-21 02:27:49+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13666017127 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Language school"
---
Por ejemplo, una versión más neutral y objetiva de tu texto podría ser: "Escuela de idiomas"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-29 04:33:07+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180566274
(Delete spam tags. First version)
Udarian (2026-04-29 20:43:23+00:00): mapping the roads like this (where you use geometry to represent movements instead of turn:lanes and change:lanes is generally incorrect. When there is one continuous area for a roads carriageway it should only have one way representing it as per the "One feature, one OSM element" principle in OSM. This includes when there is solid line between lanes, for more info please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Dual_carriageway .

Happy mapping,
Udar.
NeisBot (2026-03-21 03:24:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 33 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/567877334 v1 | 13 crossings
https://osm.org/way/11168227 v5 | 8 crossings
https://osm.org/way/763712227 v1 | 4 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/5464907431 v2
https://osm.org/node/7135658352 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180184343
iandees (2026-03-21 03:45:17+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5464907431 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180184635, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
JuanElDemografo (2026-03-21 13:52:42+00:00): You should keep edits local when reasonable. This changeset included edits in Dallas and Miami.

Additionally, if you disagree with building=warehouse being used for storage rentals, you might want to bring it up with the community since that's the current advice given on the wiki for shop=storage_rental.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180184343
Udarian (2026-03-21 20:15:12+00:00): also why did you remove the amenity, website and phone tags from way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/295187753 as that website seems to still be up?

Happy mapping,
Udar