piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
TrickyFoxy (2025-05-18 12:07:14+00:00): By the way, you can split roads directly in StreetComplete 

https://telegra.ph/Advanced-StreetComplete-08-04#2.-Cutting-roads
jeslop (2025-05-18 16:31:25+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166439341
jeslop (2025-05-18 16:28:47+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166439232
jeslop (2025-05-18 16:28:33+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166439221
jeslop (2025-05-18 16:36:48+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166439582
jeslop (2025-05-18 16:39:25+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166439668
TrickyFoxy (2025-05-18 12:01:22+00:00): 👋  No need to write name=Road. It is already clear that this is a road.
jeslop (2025-05-18 16:32:36+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166439400
jeslop (2025-05-18 16:41:49+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166439762
jeslop (2025-05-18 16:42:16+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166439776
jeslop (2025-05-18 16:42:17+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166439776
jeslop (2025-05-18 16:44:28+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166439865
jeslop (2025-05-18 16:44:29+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166439865
jeslop (2025-05-18 16:46:46+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166439965
jeslop (2025-05-18 16:46:47+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166439965
jeslop (2025-05-18 16:50:06+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166440086
jeslop (2025-05-18 16:47:25+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166439984
jeslop (2025-05-18 16:53:26+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166440234
TrickyFoxy (2025-05-18 12:00:36+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166427574
jeslop (2025-05-18 16:54:16+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166440262
jeslop (2025-05-18 16:54:02+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166440255
jeslop (2025-05-18 16:55:55+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166440334
jeslop (2025-05-18 16:58:57+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166440451
jeslop (2025-05-18 16:59:37+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166440481
jeslop (2025-05-18 17:16:50+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166441193
jeslop (2025-05-18 17:19:37+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166441328
BCNorwich (2025-05-21 06:52:25+00:00): Duplicated sections of highways, Way: 1387623399 and Way: 1387623398, are removed.
poepiedejoepie (2026-07-26 11:57:58+00:00): Hoe weet je dat dit de Bloemhof is? Volgens mij is het onderdeel van de Prunuslaan. Het gebouw krijgt de naam Bloemenhof, maar het adres blijft Prunuslaan, dacht ik.
Zilvervisje (2026-07-26 19:44:49+00:00): https://zoek.officielebekendmakingen.nl/gmb-2024-39130.html
poepiedejoepie (2026-07-26 21:40:27+00:00): Nice, dank!
RafaBoski (2025-05-18 16:14:54+00:00): A rzeczywiście, mój błąd. A się zastanawiałem, dlaczego się pokazuje w kolorze pomarańczowym, a nie szarym. Musiałem coś źle nacisnąć przez przypadek przy ostatniej edycji tej drogii.
syntex (2025-07-27 11:45:37+00:00): Pewnie jakiś missclick szablonu w iD
TrickyFoxy (2025-05-18 11:59:53+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166427540
jeslop (2025-05-18 17:23:19+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166441511
Gregory Peony (2025-05-17 21:48:56+00:00): Overall these footprints look to have been improved in accuracy. Some footprints used to envelope multiple buildings and now outline individual footprints. --- I think that one of the footprints I flagged envelopes multiple buildings and the other should be suared becasue it looks like it is distorted in the imagery. Buildings that are not round or have irregular angles tend to be located on junctions or are in densley built areas where that shape maximises the use of available space.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166409560
5m4u9 (2025-05-19 02:43:15+00:00): Hola Rodolfo,

al parecer volviste a añadir la etiqueta :(

la etiqueta "university" es para especificar que tipo de entidad educativa: "facultad", "departamento" o similares. y se añade otra subetiqueta "faculty" o "departement"... para clasificar "ingeniería, humanidades, arquitectura, etc"... 

Ya tienes la etiqueta operator para decir quién gestiona cada cosa. Y podrías incluso añadir "owner" para diferencia quién gestiona de quién es el propietario.

En las estadísticas mundiales... se ve el error de aprox 3500 usos en la UMSA (mal) y el resto del mundo bien :(

https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/university#values
5m4u9 (2025-05-19 02:45:46+00:00): me olvidaba las otras característica de la etiqueta "university"... los institutos de investigación, los laboratorios, las oficinas, y los centros de estudiantes, bilbiotecas y postgrados.... al menos esos tenemos en cochabamba. obviamente hay más, pero
rodolfovargas (2025-05-20 13:23:51+00:00): Hola estimado.
En primer lugar, agradecerte por tu interés y colaboración. 
Me gustaría conversar más ampliamente sobre este tema de etiquetas. Mi interés es mapear todos los ambientes de las universidades. 
No creo que sea un tema "cerrado", ya que no hallo etiquetas para mapear aulas, depósitos, secretarias (por ejemplo).
Me parece un paso grande de mapeo, pero no es el ultimo, se puede mejorar, en el entendido que cualquier usuario del Mundo sepa qué infraestructura tiene cada universidad. 

Si estás de acuerdo, podemos hacer un taller para "consensuar" las etiquetas dentro de los centros de educación. 

No se cómo podríamos contactarnos. Escucho sugerencias. 
 
Saludos.

NOTA: Taller para también proponer a la comunidad OSM nuevas etiquetas.
5m4u9 (2025-05-20 19:53:22+00:00): Rodolfo, genial! Yo también tenía/tengo el interés de mapear todos los ambientes de la U aquí en Cochabamba ya lo hice en parte. 

Casi todo se puede mapear con etiquetas existentes o ampliando subetiquetas. La mayoría de oficinas caen en office=university + university=* (administration u office para una general o secretary para secretarías) + faculty=* + department=para las carreras). Hasta incluso se puede los centros de estudiantes (office=association + association=student + university=student_centre + faculty + derpatment) o las ful variando un poco.

Las aulas deberían ser áreas building:part dentro de cada edificio (builidng=university), pero yo las puse como nodos por el momento porque no hay planos detallados... la etiqueta de aulas (indoor=room + room=classroom) y así.

Con las etiquetas correctas sobretodo: university + faculty + department se puede filtrar oficinas/lugares por cada facultad o "carrera". Lo más importante es tener el nombre correcto de cada cosa para empezar y luego se puede ir añadiendo etiquetas y subetiquetas.

En este mes voy a revisar el campus universitario de la UMSS actualizando algunas cosas nuevas y de paso generaré ejemplos de oficinas o lugares y sus etiquetas a modo de ejemplo.

Luego, podemos coordinar una reunión virtual o quizá posiblemente vaya a La Paz para agosto y consensuamos criterios.
jeslop (2025-05-18 17:23:52+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166441540
jeslop (2025-05-18 17:27:21+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166441669
jeslop (2025-05-18 17:32:41+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166441849
csnoke (2025-05-17 23:21:53+00:00): It exists in aerial imagery as a parking lot, is not a street. People drive down the constantly because directions are routing them down...
csnoke (2025-05-17 23:23:29+00:00): There is not an alley or an easement here, it's a private parking lot.
CurlingMan13 (2025-05-17 23:52:55+00:00): It is mapped as a service road, which is correct.  Access tags were added.
csnoke (2025-05-18 00:08:32+00:00): I'm installing bollards tomorrow to block access, it will no longer be a service road.
CurlingMan13 (2025-05-18 04:01:38+00:00): That's fine.  I will add tags for bollards!
jeslop (2025-05-18 17:33:04+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166441858
homer__simpsons (2025-05-17 21:42:13+00:00): Edit: the comment is completely wrong, I added "Coralie Fleurs" florist following note nº 3110315
NeisReview (2025-05-18 07:34:55+00:00): #NameCheck

Hello and welcome to OSM.

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits, particularly those concerning the names you've added or modified.

Some of these names caught my attention as they are quite unique or a bit unusual. Could you please confirm if these additions were intentional or if they might have been added mistakenly?

Looking forward to your response.

Thank you!
Qwajo OSM (2025-05-19 19:26:54+00:00): Good effort. Are you able to proide  evidence for the information provided?
joost schouppe (2025-09-17 13:29:58+00:00): Hoi Ardennen8,
Ik weet niet goed wat je op deze site probeerde te bereiken, maar je hebt enorm veel overbodige tags toegevoegd op heel veel objecten. Ik heb hier een en ander vereenvoudigd: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172065005
Bijvoorbeeld zat de info over de site als geheel op bijna alle objecten erbinnen. Hierdoor zat je met enorm vaal amenities, en ook gekke dingen als type=multipolygon op gewone lijnen. Je had ook building:part gebruikt om namen toe te kennen, wat niet de bedoeling is. Ik heb enkel ref overgehouden voor die info.
joost schouppe (2025-09-17 13:33:38+00:00): Ik zie gelijkaardige problematische edits hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155427132#map=11/51.1091/3.7992
Bekijk het resultaat eens voor de sites van Broeders van Liefde via https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2bON 
Veel duplicates!
rskedgell (2025-05-18 12:44:01+00:00): Has the car park in West Harrow Recreation Ground formerly(?) accessed from Wilson Gardens/Butler Road also been removed? You have deleted its access road in this changeset.
NeisBot (2025-05-17 22:32:35+00:00): Hi Aelxen, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 93% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 120 natural(s)
- 2 landuse(')

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=166410686
Aelxen (2025-05-17 23:35:18+00:00): Yes, that's normal, the trees were encroaching on residential areas, which led to mistakes. What's more, the tree zones were quite random and encroached on building points.
NeisReview (2025-05-18 07:40:59+00:00): Thank you for your private message and confirming that your deletions were intentional.
Leo Slager (2025-05-18 00:16:46+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
user_5359 (2025-05-18 13:59:14+00:00): Hello! Thank you for adding the bus stops. Short question: Why did you use the key Koleje_Malopolskie_ref instead of ref:Koleje_Malopolskie ?
Bartek444 (2025-05-18 18:25:38+00:00): It is key variations
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ref#Key_variations
user_5359 (2025-05-19 03:04:35+00:00): Of course the key is not wrong, but you can see that there is only a short prefix before the ref. These are also in lower case. For quicker recognition of what the key can mean, the suggested variant under Extensions https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ref#Extensions makes more sense (if necessary also country code)
chris66 (2025-09-07 07:17:27+00:00): Hi,
Du hast dieses Telefon auf disused gesetzt, ohne amenity=telephone zu löschen, war das so beabsichtigt? 

LG Chris :)
mueschel (2025-05-18 10:32:37+00:00): Welcome to OSM!
Something went wrong here: Instead of editing existing objects, you uploaded a whole new set, duplicating the existing data.

Please only use the integrated download function of JOSM. Don't try to download e.g. a GeoJSON file elsewhere and open it in JOSM - it will result in this kind of duplicated data.
threeof4 (2025-12-28 17:36:58+00:00): Hi, I saw your additions and  would like to suggest that in stead of using powerplant photovoltaic, 'Solarfarm' is used.
I changed the one in Prescott already. 
3o4
Syl (2025-05-21 14:46:00+00:00): Bonjour, il y a un problème avec votre logiciel, à chaque fois que j'enlève ce SIRET incorrect vous le remettez. C'est un numéro qui correspond à la Martinique alors qu'ici c'est Mayotte.
Pouvez-vous corriger ?
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2025-05-21 15:06:21+00:00): Bonjour,

Merci pour votre alerte, il s'agit en effet d'un mauvais renseignement envoyé par le garage.
Nous venons de le corriger

Cordialement,
L'Equipe DB
Taya_S (2025-05-22 11:34:38+00:00): Reverted sockpuppet edits DWG Ticket#2025021610000053

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166608602
Kinsio (2025-05-18 20:35:49+00:00): I think I see the logic with the "local knowledge" source tag here, but as I previously discussed with you, that's still not appropriate unless you're mapping information that you know from having seen it in person. For a changeset like this I'd suggest something like adding the URL to the Gitea issue, then hitting Enter, then entering in something like "email correspondence with business owner", which will create a semicolon-separated source tag that other mappers will understand as meaning you're referring to multiple sources.
Rockedf (2025-05-19 14:28:53+00:00): Hello, I see you are thoroughly reviewing my work, and that's good; it helps us fix what we might be doing wrong. In this case, the source tag 'local knowledge' means that I have extrapolated information from several sources, including that of the business owner, so I can confirm that the place exists in reality even if I haven't been there physically (you can see the #btcmap guide regarding this, which follows OSM rules).  

https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki

As for the verification of the node at the time of its creation, I have always used the check_date tag, and when it is verified by others who fill out the form for it, I use check_date:currency:XBT to indicate that the site accepts Bitcoin as a payment method on the day of its verification.

 https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Merchants#verified-tags---more-informationmap-legendhtmlverified


I want to mention that all the places I have added to the map are checked and re-checked; nothing is added lightly. 
There is a prior verification, whether by email, the business's website, or calling the person directly.

If a site does not have a physical location on the map, I explain to the owner that it cannot be added because it violates OSM rules.

 I hope you understand how things work in BTC Map. 

If you have any other questions, please write on Discord.

Thank you very much, and have a great day.
Kinsio (2025-05-19 15:10:08+00:00): "In this case, the source tag 'local knowledge' means that I have extrapolated information from several sources, including that of the business owner, so I can confirm that the place exists in reality even if I haven't been there physically."

The issue is that this is not what "local knowledge" means. I encourage you to consult the OpenStreetMap wiki page addressing common values of the source tag, including "local knowledge": https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source#General_sources_commonly_used_by_human_mappers. In short, unless you have seen the feature you're mapping in person, it's not appropriate to use "local knowledge" as your source. A combination of indirect sources of information can indeed create reasonable certainty that the feature exists and that the information you're adding about it is accurate, but it's important to accurately document where exactly you got the information nonetheless.
Rockedf (2025-05-19 15:19:23+00:00): Understood.
Kinsio (2025-05-19 15:41:12+00:00): Also, I hope you don't think I'm picking on you in particular! I just decided to start keeping an eye on the BTC Map edits and you've been the most active recently. Thank you for your contributions to OpenStreetMap, and thanks for being understanding!
Rockedf (2025-05-19 15:46:33+00:00): There are no problems in pointing out what we believe can be improved! 

For better communication and understanding, you can write to me on Discord whenever you want. 

Thank you very much for your contributions as well.
cuzi (2025-05-18 23:23:25+00:00): Does this trail really exist?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4764517
Taya_S (2025-05-22 11:37:27+00:00): Reverted sockpuppet edits DWG Ticket#2025021610000053

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166608741
silversurfer83 (2025-05-18 17:55:32+00:00): Moin Alex,

wenn du einen Güllepott zu einem storage_tank umtaggst (hab ich nix gegen), dann entfern bitte auch "building=yes", da ich das an diesen Objekten für absolut falsch halte (nicht begehbar, kein Dach, ...)

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166412610
AlexF999 (2025-05-18 18:04:10+00:00): Hab ich geändert. Danke für den Hinweis.
silversurfer83 (2025-05-18 18:33:50+00:00): Perfekt. Danke
cuzi (2025-05-18 23:19:34+00:00): FYI an anonymous user created a note about this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4764544
cuzi (2025-05-22 11:12:51+00:00): I have reverted this changeset

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166607610
jm428 (2025-06-03 23:18:06+00:00): Hi, this isn't a proper usage of the  access=private tag. Here is the definition of access=private according to the wiki:
"Public access is not allowed. Access is granted with individual permission only. Examples: A driveway with a no trespassing or keep out sign; A company parking lot for employees only."

It appears that someone has already removed access=private from Five Paths Court, and I will remove the tag from 
Amey road, so you don't have to worry about this changeset but it would be great if you could go back through your edit history and correct any other times you have misused this tag. Thanks!
cuzi (2025-05-18 23:20:36+00:00): And there is also a note about this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4764535
DogEarwax (2025-05-19 13:53:36+00:00): I have fixed that now.
OptikalCrow (2025-06-04 00:57:30+00:00): Hey there,

Your improvements are welcome, though everything on this property should be marked as access=private as it is a derelict site and closed to the public. Just a heads up if you come back to this area, I've added the tags so no need to do anything.
jhaluska80 (2025-06-04 01:19:41+00:00): Thanks.  I work on (or at least investigate) a lot of random notes across the US.  I'll try to keep it in mind if I find myself here again.
cuzi (2025-05-18 23:21:46+00:00): Same here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4764528
cuzi (2025-05-18 23:25:38+00:00): also: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4764529
cuzi (2025-05-22 11:05:03+00:00): I have reverted this changeset, because it contains nonexistent roads

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166607310
Taya_S (2025-05-22 11:28:30+00:00): Please see: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18265
Taya_S (2025-05-22 11:37:28+00:00): Reverted sockpuppet edits DWG Ticket#2025021610000053

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166608741
Taya_S (2025-05-22 11:33:46+00:00): Reverted sockpuppet edits DWG Ticket#2025021610000053

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166608564
pkoby (2025-05-22 16:49:25+00:00): This isn't closed, I walked the length of it 22 days ago, and it's certainly not blocked. That's why I added it.
b3rnardino (2025-05-24 02:52:16+00:00): I'm there 4-5 times a week, including just today. There are numerous logs and branches deliberately placed at either end of the old trail to block access. It's an old unsustainable trail that funnels stormwater downhill, contributing to erosion, and is redundant with the trail that runs parallel to it, which is still on OSM.

https://imgur.com/a/d4zppRO
pkoby (2025-05-25 16:37:50+00:00): I'm sorry, I must have mistaken this for a different one I took recently. I have taken this trail before, but I think it may have been last summer...

Apologies for my impulsive revert and comment.
Roydon Olive (2025-05-18 04:43:13+00:00): I'm just noting here that this change is still being debating in the original changeset at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166326635
TrickyFoxy (2025-05-18 22:57:06+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166451255
maraf24 (2025-07-15 15:40:25+00:00): Co to za zmiany? Dlaczego?
Vodevil_Mark (2025-07-15 15:45:25+00:00): Aby uzyskać piękny pokaz płatnych map drogowych podczas rozładunku przez overpass
maraf24 (2025-07-15 15:53:08+00:00): Wszystko już było otagowane prawidłowo wcześniej.
Vodevil_Mark (2025-07-15 15:56:41+00:00): i teraz wszystko jest w porządku. pokaż mi gdzie popełniłem błąd
Bustycat (2025-07-02 14:03:25+00:00): 祥和路非封閉道路，亦非市府認定的快速道路（「中安快速道路」並非正式名稱），不知單單車子路以西分類改trunk用意為何？
Bustycat (2025-07-04 08:46:47+00:00): 新北市官方認定，祥和路全線為一般市區道路，並開放任意車種通行。因此不可使用trunk分類，現有勘誤之急迫需要已更改。
Andrea Musuruane (2025-05-18 17:08:09+00:00): Ciao. Cortesemente, puoi evitare di aggiungere bridge dove non ci sono? https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=530869894760291&focus=photo Grazie, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166414938
sanchit3008 (2025-05-23 19:26:14+00:00): the road in the middle of the parking lot is incorrect.
user_21183540 (2025-05-24 03:15:03+00:00): Hello Sanchit. I have mapped the sports complex using aerial imagery and I don't have any local knowledge of the sports complex. If you think the service road in the parking is incorrect, you can fix it yourself. Let me know if you need any help.
TrickyFoxy (2025-05-18 11:55:04+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166427363
Eddie845 (2025-05-19 16:43:55+00:00): Hola, he notado que modificaste incorrectamente una calle, convirtiéndola en un arroyo.
Soy un mapero local y conozco muy bien la zona, por lo que te agradecería que, en caso de duda sobre una edición, te pusieras en contacto con los colaboradores locales antes de realizar cambio. 
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/mx
¡Gracias!
Eddie845 (2025-05-19 16:44:45+00:00): Procederé a revertir tu edición, me pongo a tu disposición para futuras ediciones.
infeeeee (2025-05-19 13:27:35+00:00): Hello! Welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Dean's Hotel was already mapped, removed your duplicates. 

What is the that childcare you added on Leonardo 7? I moved it to the correct building but I can't find any info about that. Are you sure you wanted to add it as a childcare?
Fizzie-DWG (2025-06-01 01:16:11+00:00): DWG revert - apparent undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167032831
literan (2026-01-11 10:22:26+00:00): "Тур Юнайт" это НЕ название данных дорог и троп.

не надо вносить в поле name все подряд

вычищу
user_5359 (2025-05-19 09:23:19+00:00): Welcome to OSM! What is the mean of the tag army = 空军第19师第56团?
mavl (2025-05-18 05:33:32+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 165632758, 165634221, 165825458, 165825502, 165827872, 165835538, 165836273, 165837626, 165872231, 165874044, 165889645, 165890135, 165922872, 166131871, 166132869, 166132878, 166133270, 166134777, 166144741, 166147410, 166147539, 166147890, 166149471, 166149715, 166182952.
luketaylor (2025-05-18 06:06:24+00:00): misspoke in the description, should say nyquist-harcourt sanctuary improvements
Daemon Targaryen (2025-05-26 18:04:40+00:00): Hola, por favor abstenerse de añadir cosas que no existen. No existe (ni puede existir) un 'parque' en ese lugar. Son terrenos privados. Tampoco existe una 'calle Atalaya'. Por más que en el PRC esté planificada, el área no está ni cerca de ser urbanizada todavía, por lo que no corresponde ponerle nombre a un cortafuegos.
Saludos!