piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
StantonPfarri25 (2025-05-04 14:20:30+00:00): Hier die Nachricht eines Users, die ich vor einigen Jahren erhalten habe:

"Guten Abend, ich habe dich jetzt wegen Vandalismus gemeldet, weil du trotz Ermahnung erneut falsche Informationen eingegeben hast. Konkret geht es um diverse Skirouten am Arlberg, bspw. die Skiroute Langer Zug, welche sowohl nach Aussage der Bergbahnen - inkl. diverser Schilder im Skigebiet - als auch bewiesen durch diverse Videos auf Youtube, regelmäßig präpariert werden. Bitte unterlasse künftig diese Änderungen, anderenfalls werde ich eine Sperre deines Benutzerkontos veranlassen. Gruß"
fs_LT (2025-05-09 05:25:23+00:00): Das ist etwas verkürzt dargestellt mit der "Nachricht eines Users": https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=7385932
gwilliams2nd (2025-04-29 21:33:45+00:00): Apologies, misread the wiki and applied the wrong info. Thank you for fixing it.
perenniallylate (2025-05-06 09:00:04+00:00): Hallo Piet@ch, gibt es diesen Weg nicht (mehr) oder darf er nicht benutzt werden? Beim letzteren wäre eine Löschung nicht notwendig gewesen, da mit access= no bereits der richtige Tag gesetzt ist.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165579512
Piet@ch (2025-05-07 17:35:58+00:00): Hallo perenniallylate, das mit access=no hatte ich nicht gewusst. Die Verbindung zwischen der Strasse und dem Weg ist zwar möglich, sollte aber nicht benutzt werden.
Gibt es ein Undo?
perenniallylate (2025-05-07 18:45:38+00:00): Hi, das macht gar nichts. Es gibt diverse Tools für Reverts/Undos, diese sind aber meist gedacht um Vandalismus zu beseitigen und auch mit Vorsicht zu verwenden, da sie bei grösseren Changesets zu Konflikten führen können. Ich habe in diesem Fall osm-revert verwendet. Das resultierende Changeset siehst du hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165952888

Wenn du Unsicherheiten zu einem Tag hast, kannst du im iD editor den Infoknopf verwenden, der dich gleich zum Wiki weiterleitet. 

Hier beispielsweise die Wikiseite zum access Tag. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access

Wenn sonst Fragen auftauchen kannst du auch gerne mir oder anderen Mappern eine Nachricht schreiben :)
perenniallylate (2025-05-07 18:47:23+00:00): Zu den access tags gehört zum Beispiel auch access=private, was sehr nützlich ist um auch Privatstrassen und Wege eintragen zu können.
okadatsuneo (2025-05-01 09:36:56+00:00): zyxzyxさん、こんにちは。
二輪車、歩行者通行禁止なのになぜmortorwayではダメなのでしょうか？
okadatsuneo (2025-05-01 11:26:49+00:00): highway=motorwayの定義やtalk-jaの2018年の議論も読んで、「高規格道路」の意味合いがあると理解しました。
ですので、現状の「自動車専用道路の標識がある道路」との定義で了解しました。
zyxzyx (2025-05-01 11:36:06+00:00): これは、コミュニティで合意された highway=mortorway の規準があり、規準の再確認をお願いします。

それを見ますと、「自動車専用の標識（＝青地に白い車）」が掲示された道路」とのことですので、現地をご確認願います。（「二輪車、歩行者通行禁止」ではありません）

もしも規準を改めたいとお考えでしたら、コミュニティへ提議してください。
ginnyTheCat (2025-05-06 18:40:50+00:00): I wanted to ask what you based https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1382239929 on as there is a fence east of the parking lot.
StVeit_Maps (2025-04-30 12:39:18+00:00): Sieht gut aus. [Antwort auf review_requested=yes]
Jay May (2025-05-15 11:38:33+00:00): Please do NOT mark old Soviet administrative divisions as if they still existed. They are not relevant today and it will only add confusion on Kazakhstan's already messy map.
If you want to add those, add "was:" before any tags (was:name; was:administrative_division, etc.)
Вальдимар (2025-05-16 05:16:31+00:00): ok i will try
TinPetreković (2025-04-29 12:41:46+00:00): Accidental node creation #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165590735
kzmrzzg (2025-04-30 20:44:32+00:00): Proszę, usuń znacznik "lotnisko" - używa się go do CZYNNYCH lotnisk. Stary Grodków jest oznaczony jako ruiny - bo tym w istocie są pozostałości lotniska. Twoja zmiana daje na OSM symbol samolotu, co może wprowadzać w błąd.
grzegorz75jan (2025-04-30 21:34:10+00:00): Oznaczenie lotniska trzeba zdjąć jak najszybciej.
Nie wiem jak to oznaczyć ale nie może zostać jako lotnisko. 

Na dzień dobry użyć coś z https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix a później myśleć jak to oznaczyć finalnie.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165581552
grzegorz75jan (2025-04-30 21:40:59+00:00): Usunąłem to.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165581552
vasony (2025-05-01 06:17:55+00:00): Szia!

Légy szíves ne törölj házakat. 
Ha egy háznak nem jó a geometriája, akkor a meglévőt alakítsd át ne töröld és újra, mert a teljes szerkesztéstörténetet elveszíti az objektum. Különösen fájó, hogy a házszámokat is sikerült letörölni a régi házzal együtt.

Tamás
Kilencfarku Macska (2025-05-01 20:52:44+00:00): Szia Tamás!

Köszönöm, hogy szóltál, figyelni fogok rá. 
Többnyire akkor töröltem házakat, ha nem összetartozó épületek voltak egyként ábrázolva (amiknek akár külön házszámuk is van - ezeket elvileg preferált külön épületként feltüntetni) Törölt házszámos épületnél - ha a házszám helyes volt - visszaírtam az új objektumra.
Amúgy ezen a környéken lakom. Ahol helyesbítek, ott a hiányzó házszámokat is igyekszem pótolni, korrigálni.
NTTrailsLSE (2025-04-29 22:44:40+00:00): Hi, thanks for flagging the use of multilingual name - loc_name is perhaps better suited for what was intended here. With regards to the use of grid references in the start and end point, this was done largely to match the website, but we will take the feedback on board and review how we address this on other trails. Thanks again!
gurglypipe (2025-04-30 11:27:06+00:00): Hiya, thanks for your message (and sorry I didn’t message you; I should have, I was responding to edits in a rush between other work).

What exactly was intended with the name:en/loc_name tagging? It looks like it’s just naming one of the geographical features on the route. Is that name used in a particular way on the NT webpages for each route, or something? I feel like I’m missing some context :)

Thanks for your work on this, it’s nice to see the NT continuing to embrace OSM for more and more things :D
NTTrailsLSE (2025-04-30 20:56:48+00:00): Hi, thanks for the response. We are beginning a process of adding all of the NT promoted walking trails into OSM, with the ambition of using the data to update our website in the future. We are looking to make our trail pages easier to find, provide better pre-visit information, allow visitors to filter for trails that suit their needs, and add functionality around route planning & navigation. As a result, between April 2025 and February 2026, we are mapping the routes, along with supporting infrastructure (ie. cafes, toilets, benches, viewpoints, car parks etc) into OSM. For further context around the project, see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities/National_Trust_Paths.

With regards to name tagging in this instance, we have several versions of the trail appearing on information boards and on our website. Since the initial edit, we have taken the opportunity to discuss this with the local property team and have agreed one version that will be used across all of our promoted materials going forwards. This will be reflected in the name= tag. Other names for the trail, seen on information boards or on the website will be tagged using loc_name= for ease and understanding. 

We will also be looking to review how we can integrate the existing start and end points on our website (including addresses, grid references and what 3 words) with OSM going forwards, as we are aware we have not reached a perfect solution at this stage! 

Thank you again for the feedback, and please do reach out if you have any further comments or questions.
gurglypipe (2025-05-01 11:06:33+00:00): Thanks for the explanation. It sounds like a very useful project!

Have you considered using an app like StreetComplete (https://streetcomplete.app/) locally to help surveying the paths once an initial version of them is in place on OSM? I find it’s useful for recording detail on the ground easily and correctly. I realise you may have evaluated it and come up with a different strategy though.

What you say makes sense about the name tagging, thanks for the explanation. The use of name= and loc_name= like that makes sense to me!

Regarding start and end points, it should be possible to derive the grid reference / address / etc. of the start and end points programmatically when you pull a route into your website, by looking at the start and end nodes of the ordered list of ways in the route relation, and then reverse-geocoding them using standard tools. It might get a bit complex for routes which aren’t a simple loop or linear route, but that should be possible to tag by setting the route member roles correctly (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route%3Dhiking#Roles).

I guess you’re in good contact with someone at OSM UK already who can help you with tagging guidance, so I’ll leave those suggestions with you and shut up now :) Have a good day!
NTTrailsLSE (2025-05-01 22:10:00+00:00): Hi, yes - we reviewed a number of different field based editing apps during our pilot testing phase of the project, to include StreetComplete. At the moment, we have decided to use of Vespucci as it seems to have a greater ranger of editing functionality, though we recognise StreetComplete is perhaps more user friendly! The GIS Trails team are aware of all of the options and will make use of both, as appropriate. 

Similarly, we are in discussion with two OSM UK board members, and our development team around automating things like What3Words, but have yet to finalise this. Regardless, it is helpful to have feedback and be pointed towards member roles as this may be helpful for routes with alternative / seasonal sections of trail, so thank you again. NTTrailsLSE
wolfbert (2025-05-25 10:27:52+00:00): Hallo, Trafos haben i.d.R. keine Adresse. Zumindest am Luftbild sieht das nicht nach einem Turm sondern eher nach building=service (begehbar) oder man_made=street_cabinet aus. utility=power, substation=distribution und ev. name= TST ... bieten sich auch noch an.
Sky-Flyer (2025-05-25 18:57:06+00:00): Hallo, wir haben immer "Trafo" dazu gesagt. Früher war es ein höheres Gebäude (2. Stöcker oder so) vor einigen Jahren wurde es zu einem einstöckigen Transformatorhäuschen umgebaut. Keine Ahnung was das jetzt genau für Kategorie ist. Sieht so aus: https://maps.apple.com/look-around?address=Bertastra%C3%9Fe+38%2C+3340+Waidhofen+an+der+Ybbs%2C+%C3%96sterreich&coordinate=47.9553496%2C14.7583005&name=Bertastra%C3%9Fe+38&_mvs=Ci0JTsiJRUj6R0AR7%2Bff9SeELUAZAEDO2TmRe0AhyK9mRnvXdUApTcjRpaGk7D8%3D
lg Andreas
wolfbert (2025-05-25 19:41:25+00:00): Hat eine Tür, also building=service, ansonsten wie oben, Details siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building=service und https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:power=substation
Sky-Flyer (2025-05-25 19:44:10+00:00): Trägst du das ein, oder soll ich das?
wolfbert (2025-05-26 06:44:02+00:00): Mach nur.
Đuro Jiří (2025-10-13 11:17:47+00:00): Ciao, attenzione,in FVG immagini Bing sono abbastanza vecchie, meglio usare Esri. Appena ho rimosso una piccola strada che non esiste diversi anni, però su Bing si vede.
damianeue (2025-10-13 17:27:48+00:00): grazie per il check
sorcrosc (2025-04-29 10:45:21+00:00): Emabarto ti pregherei di fermarti e consultarti con la comunità italiana (in mailing list o sul canale Telegram) prima di procedere con queste modifiche massive.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/What%27s_the_problem_with_mechanical_edits%3F

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct

https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-il

https://t.me/OpenStreetMapItalia
Emabarto (2025-04-29 18:33:05+00:00): @sorcrosc Ciao grazie dell'osservazione. Pensavo che non rientrassero in modifiche massive per il fatto che la modifica è stata fatta in modo singolo guardando la strada e il contesto nel quale si trova, rispettando dei criteri come per esempio:
1- quando il nome è Via S. Pertini siccome esiste solo una personalità simile a cui viene assegnata la via, sarà sicuramente Via Sandro Pertini;
2- quando il nome è Via S. Pertini e una strada adiacente è Via A. De Gasperi sicuramente sarà sempre Via Sandro Pertini:
3- confronto consultando con altri provider che non usano OSM e ANNCSU.
Detto ciò mi fermo e sento cosa ne pensa la community.
Grazie ancora
ivanbranco (2025-10-19 16:28:17+00:00): Ciao, a me non sembra fosse mancante, era già mappato come area: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/732244879/
Jordi MF (2025-04-29 10:09:36+00:00): La descripción de este changeset no se corresponde con las modificaciones realizadas, las cuales son las mismas que las realizadas por un usuario bloqueado múltiples veces.
Jordi MF (2025-04-29 13:25:45+00:00): La descripción de este changeset no se corresponde con las modificaciones realizadas, las cuales son las mismas que las realizadas por un usuario bloqueado múltiples veces.
limes11 (2025-04-29 13:02:24+00:00): Hallo hartungt,

wann warst du zuletzt da ?

Das Stück östlich der Landgrafenstraße existiert seit ein paar Monaten nicht, da das Hotel abgerissen wird/wurde. Sperrung bereits am Stadion.

Oder wurde der in den letzten 2 Wochen wiederhergestellt ?

Viele Grüße
limes11 (2025-04-30 17:23:59+00:00): Bitte um Rückmeldung
hartungt (2025-05-14 09:55:36+00:00): Sorry für die krankheitsbedingt späte Rückmeldung. Ja, durch die aktuelle Baustelle ist der Weg schon wieder gesperrt.
limes11 (2025-05-14 15:31:46+00:00): alles klar, habe das überarbeitet. VG
Scout Jens (2025-07-20 12:36:28+00:00): Zu Leitplanken: Die Pfeile sollen in Richtung der Leitwirkung zeigen (meistend ist das die Straße)
user_5359 (2025-04-30 10:59:21+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I remove your SEO SPAM entry.
eggie (2025-04-29 11:15:40+00:00): Dag DKloppenburg.
Het is eigenlijk niet correct.  Motorvoertuigen worden per default tegengehouden door het paaltje met uitzondering van tweewielers, paarden en voetgangers.
Die hoeven dus ook niet toegevoegd worden met =yes
Uitzonderingen kun je wel toevoegen. Bv motorcycle=yes als die er door mogen.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dbollard

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-04-29 11:21:24+00:00): De defaulttagging heb ik verwijderd.. 
Denk niet dat het de bedoeling is dat motorfietsen mogen passeren, want de uitzonderingen zijn tweewielers moped, mofa en  bicycle (default) 

MVG
eggie
pavvv (2025-04-29 11:08:52+00:00): It already exists https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/370301718
Please revert your change
Myshor (2025-04-29 12:17:20+00:00): The desceription is for building and it's not searchable at all in OSMAnd that's why I added POI to give possibility to use the description name in search.

So I will not revert this.
pavvv (2025-04-29 20:19:09+00:00): All that had to be done was to add office=government to the building outline which I already did.
Myshor (2025-04-29 21:01:55+00:00): Thanks... I will remove my POI then.
Myshor (2025-04-29 21:05:55+00:00): Ok... I see it's already removed. Thanks again for help.
JanerNaKole (2025-05-04 08:21:58+00:00): została zmieniona klasyfikacja tej ścieżki w ostanim czasie?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165586306
JanerNaKole (2025-05-04 09:07:11+00:00): A, dobrze widzę już. Źle zinterpretowałem obecność znaku C-16. Ujednoliciłem na całej ścieżcę tagowania z C-16.
eggie (2025-04-29 11:23:55+00:00): Dag Energetic.

Ik heb adresnode 38 weer hersteld. Beter het bedrijf direct op de juiste adresnode bijtaggen. 
Nu was een adres verdwenen en een ander adres kwam 2x voor.

MVG
eggie
rskedgell (2025-04-29 13:24:27+00:00): Is there now a 24/7 prohibition on motor vehicles, or there signed time restrictions?

The proposals made in 2021 were (in OSM format)
no @ (Mo-Fr 17:30-23:00; Sa-Su 11:00-23:00)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102015672
TrickyFoxy (2025-04-30 10:25:34+00:00): 1. Почему вы удаляете здания?
2. Не рисуйте здание на всю территорию. Выберите тип Промышленная зона
3. Не пишите в комментарии рандомные буквы. Уж лучше ничего не пишите или пишите одно и то же
SpinOff (2025-04-29 16:16:55+00:00): Hej. Nie możesz użyć tagu name w taki sposób. Przeczytaj rozdział "Nazwa jest tylko nazwą" na tej stronie: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Nazwy
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165587535
NorthCrab_upload (2025-04-29 11:31:05+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12797672930
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1382279149

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Barroszt (2025-08-04 22:14:22+00:00): naprawione 3 miesiące temu
demon_box (2025-04-30 08:18:41+00:00): Ciao, Benvenuto!
Ti segnalo che è errato mappare un parco leisure=park come nodo, lo devi taggare come area.
Inoltre in questo caso il parco mappato correttamente come area esisteva già, quindi hai creato un doppione peraltro errato.
Infine non devi aggiungere come name=Parco, il name lo metti soltanto se ha un nome proprio (ad es. Parco delle Stagioni) altrimenti se non ha nome non lo devi mettere.
Grazie e BuonMapping!
P.S.: ho già provveduto alle correzioni del caso
LupeGimoozaabi (2025-04-30 10:27:15+00:00): Grazie delle dritte!
Eorl68 (2025-05-06 12:37:58+00:00): Cette modification est injurieuse envers les habitants de cette maison et n'est pas correct - il n'y a pas de salle de fête à cet endroit. Pouvez-vous effacer cette modification ?
Eorl68 (2025-05-06 12:35:24+00:00): Cette modification à l'air d'être une insulte envers les personnes vivant à cet endroit et ne sert aucune réalité cartographique, pouvez-vous l'effacer ? Cet auteur à également ouvert une modification de même nature (165588784) qui mérite également d'être effacé.
mackerski (2025-05-01 11:39:38+00:00): Reverting this. If you have a more correct number, tag it. In the meantime, the R139 is a route that connects to the M50.
EthanL13 (2025-05-01 11:45:40+00:00): The Classification of Regional Roads clearly states:

R139

"Clonshaugh — Baldoyle, Dublin (Part of old National Route 32)

Between its junction with M50 link road at Clonshaugh Road in the county of Fingal [...]"

Clonshaugh Road is not at the Turnapin Interchange, but at the subsequent roundabout. The M50 link road therefore has no number.
mackerski (2025-05-01 11:54:54+00:00): Every road has a number. If you can find a better one, we can tag it. In addition, many of the legal documents are out of step with reality on the ground (see the other edit of yours that I just reverted). We have seen all these documents and done a lot of soul searching to make the most reasonable tagging decisions we can. The N52, which legally isn't supposed to exist north of Dunleer, has very new signs for it all over Dundalk and on the M1. This is Ireland and a lot of this stuff is sloppy. So again, numbered regional roads provide connections between higher road categories. R139 is there to strategically  connect to the M50 and M1. I'm sure we can agree that its strategic purpose is _not_ to end a few hundred metres short of the motorways to terminate on an unclassified road. The status of the spur is troublesome to work out, but what's clear from the newest signs (those erected when the junction was freeflowed) is that the roundabout and spur road are no longer under motorway restrications (the spur previously was under restrictions, and I think that's why the legal docs describe the R139 as terminating on the spur). But now the spur is detrunked, the only reasonable classification is R139. And if it is to be classified as highway=secondary, it would need to be R-something.
EthanL13 (2025-05-01 12:00:01+00:00): Then I am of the opinion that the route on both sides should be classified as highway=motorway link. That is the purpose of the road. It is done in this way for the M3 link roads at Navan and Kells, which are also legally classified in the same manner as this stretch of road.
mackerski (2025-05-01 12:02:49+00:00): No, a motorway link is a road under motorway restrictions. These roads are not (though they used to be prior to the freeflowing of the M1/M50 junction).
mackerski (2025-05-01 12:20:23+00:00): BTW, this Mapillary image shows that the R139 is signed from the exit to the (previously motorway) roundabout. And because it's not shown in parentheses, that indicates that the road you follow is already R139 (again, signs can often be wrong in Ireland, but this fits what we expect and it's one of the newest signs we have in the area). https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=53.41057080005979&lng=-6.225413883371175&z=18.23259127326142&pKey=1469265353413246&focus=photo
EthanL13 (2025-05-01 14:32:05+00:00): Not necessarily. In the case of link roads a route number can be shown without brackets - see the "Proximity Rule" in Chapter 2 of the Traffic Signs Manual. While it refers to local roads specifically, I can see it being construed for use here (which is why heading towards the M50 signs indicate so, and vice versa for the R139, though I'm led to believe the blue route confirmatory signs and the sign for the Clonshaugh Rd roundabout are a mistake).

As for the motorway link, is there somewhere where it is specifically stated that they indicate motorway restrictions in place? My understanding of the tag from the OSM Wiki is that it isn't necessary the case.
Wulfmorn (2025-04-29 21:32:24+00:00): Before adding or editing stops in Norway, please read this https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/bus-stops-in-norway-guide-for-understanding-current-data-and-reporting-problems/9560

However, it looks like this warrants an edit. I'll report this moved stop to Innlandstrafikk. The southbound stop now located on the inner road will be moved out to where you created your new stop (so please remove the new one)
sef43 (2025-05-31 16:18:38+00:00): The southbound stop here is on the south side of Matrandvegen, the Northbound on the norh side. Some schoolbusses seem to stop on the service road (not sure though).

Access to the forum is often problematic for me since I usually am offline. Wiki info I use is of 2023: offline available.
sef43 (2025-05-31 17:44:14+00:00): Also the location of the marker might need some adjusting before it is put into the database, I know the side of the road is correct as well as the general position, but there is a fault of 100m (meaning the position on the street should be within 100m of the marker).
sef43 (2025-07-23 20:05:25+00:00): Today I came past this stop again and it looks like the northbound line 120 is supposed to stop on [way: 697819519](https://api.openstreetmap.org/way/697819519) (there may also be some other lines there) but I have heared from drivers, they would usually stop at way: 404611608 (the main road) while southbound realky stops on the main road near node: 12797670582.
Rom1 (2025-05-06 07:04:51+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai corrigé les attributs selon https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1382284309 mais est-ce une piscine présente toute l'année ? Si ce n'est pas le cas, ce n'est pas un objet  cartographier. Merci.
Eorl68 (2025-05-06 12:32:50+00:00): Cette modifications à l'air d'un troll, il n'y a pas de lieu de culte à cet endroit, le commentaire est balbutiant, et le nom est obscène. Pouvez-vous effacer cette modification ?
mackerski (2025-05-01 11:34:55+00:00): Although there is old paperwork declaring these roadways to be N50, all ground truth indicates the road to be N1. Furthermore, N50 would indeed be a national primary route, therefore highway=trunk. I am reverting this change.
EthanL13 (2025-05-01 11:48:36+00:00): What do you mean by "old paperwork"? If by "ground truth" you mean the N1 signage, by this logic the whole R132 from Shantalla Bridge to the city centre should also be marked N1 as there still remains plenty of outdated signage indicating N1.