piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
bxl-forever (2026-06-20 12:39:06+00:00): Hello,

Adding the barriers is fine but I think there is a problem with this changeset.

The title claims that you added a chicane barrier.  In reality, you drew entire new cycleways along roads.

This road already had properties to indicate that there is a separated cycle track.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/813146118

If you draw a cycle track as a single way, you must change the tags from the main road to remove the _northern_ track.  Your change creates double tagging and cycle renderers will now report the same cycle infrastructure twice.  Please review this edit and fix accordingly.
eggie (2026-06-20 14:19:05+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
brentmaas (2026-06-20 15:22:10+00:00): Dankjewel, Eggie :)
Comino (2026-06-20 13:14:20+00:00): You are not allowed to use the description tag like you do.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description
Please delete this tag.

The pin is on the sidewalk which is not allowed.
How have you verified this merchants is accepting Bitcoin?

Edwin Comino
BTC Map
fil63100 (2026-06-20 14:23:24+00:00): 
207
Thank you for all these comments.

I'm new here, I don't really know all this stuff, and I'm not a computer expert...
I know these merchants accept BTC because I'm part of the Bank Exit collective.
Comino (2026-06-20 14:34:42+00:00): If you don't know what you're doing, do me and the community a favor and stop what you're doing. It might sound harsh, but you're making so many mistakes that it's not funny anymore. You're making the map unnecessarily worse because of it. Familiarize yourself with how to tag first.

Bank Exit collective doesn't mean anything to me. Where did they get the information from?
Comino (2026-06-20 13:18:20+00:00): The tags you are using for opening hours are incorrect.
Please check one of our wiki’s.
https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki

How have you verified this merchants is accepting Bitcoin?

Edwin Comino
BTC Map
Comino (2026-06-20 13:30:39+00:00): You are not allowed to use the description tag like you do.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description
Please delete this tag.

The pin is on the sidewalk which is not allowed.
How have you verified this merchants is accepting Bitcoin?

Edwin Comino
BTC Map
YomanNH (2026-06-23 10:28:42+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1531010888
highway=steps + steps=0?
YomanNH (2026-07-03 07:19:36+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5372293
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-07-06 14:14:03+00:00): PW wysłałem https://www.openstreetmap.org/messages/1363556
YomanNH (2026-07-06 16:00:32+00:00): Prywatnych wiadomości na szczęście na da się wyświetlić poprzez link  ;)
Adam Haba (2026-07-06 16:45:21+00:00): Już widzę, nie wyświetlało mi się żadne powiadomienie aż do dziś
Adam Haba (2026-07-06 16:51:17+00:00): Już poprawiłem
YomanNH (2026-07-06 17:00:13+00:00): Powiadomienia przychodzą na maila, chyba że coś wyłączyłeś: https://www.openstreetmap.org/preferences/notifications
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-07-06 22:30:19+00:00): > Prywatnych wiadomości na szczęście na da się wyświetlić poprzez link ;)

inni nie mogą, ja mogę - nawet jak je skasuje z skrzynki nadawczej

może odbiorca też może?
Adam Haba (2026-07-09 20:18:06+00:00): > Powiadomienia przychodzą na maila, chyba że coś wyłączyłeś: osm.org/preferences/notifications

Przychodzą, ale z opóźnieniem
eggie (2026-06-20 13:55:44+00:00): Dag Staalblauw.. we gebruiken in Nederland de adresnodes. Dus je hoeft geen adresinfo op gebouwomtrekken te zetten.
Haal je het weer weg?
Mvg..
eggie
iuvi (2026-06-24 19:41:40+00:00): Даже если так вы не можете удалять дороги и подобного рода объекты. Надо ставить ворота на дорогу (в виде точек) и статус дороги менять на ограниченный

Пожалуйста, будьте внимательны
Snusmumriken (2026-06-21 13:03:57+00:00): Why have you added a road that no longer exists?
Thomaso58 (2026-06-21 14:48:34+00:00): Hi Snusmumriken
The highway part is now deleted. 
For me it looked strange that this part is not there. I assumed it has been deleted by hazard. I used rather new aerial fotos and on all this part is visible and in use.
I have 4 bus lines that use this not existing highway part. And that produces an error.
I will try to find out with the help of timetables the new way thqt the buses take.
BR for the information Thomas
Thomaso58 (2026-06-21 15:11:33+00:00): Hi Snusmumriken
I checked the Bus Nr. 90. It is now finished at Les Arboras Université. That means it no more uses this waypart. The timetables from Nice are good enough to update the bus routes. I assume the other 3 bus routes can also be updated in a similar way. I will do that but not know.

I check bus routes with the help of a tool for errors. This no more existing  waypart produces errors far to the nord.  I am doing that in Switzerland and a part of northern Italie, and parts near the Swiss border. In the most cases the errors can be corrected without the help of a timetable. In this case I assumed it also needs no timetable. If I need timetables, then I need a lot of time. But the timetable in nice are good an very easy to find. 
 BR Thomas
Thomaso58 (2026-06-21 20:02:06+00:00): Hi Snusmumriken
There exists an other more grave problem. All bus routes that leave "Grand Arenas" to south west are destroyed. The problem comes from "Boulvard René Cassin" north of the Holiday In. In my aerial foto I see 3 lanes. I see also traffic on the 3. lane. In fact if this lane no more exists, then the "Rue Costed et Bellonte could used as a replacement. If you could say wich way the buses take, then I can fix it. 
BR Thomas
Snusmumriken (2026-06-22 04:58:42+00:00): I won't be back in Nice until autumn, but Costed et Bellonte seems like plausible candidate
Thomaso58 (2026-07-06 07:55:46+00:00): Hi Snusmumriken
Is fixed.
A new error has been seen in this region. It is the bus Flixbus N708. Toulon Nice->Airport. I will not fix it. 
BR Thomas
I will not fix it.
❤️‍🔥 (2026-06-21 14:42:27+00:00): hi., the way you mapped it now makes it impossible to left turn into the carpark. is that intentional? just checking because that seems rather odd
GetJaded (2026-06-21 18:16:26+00:00): That's unintentional, you're welcome to revert the whole changeset. Only the "no u turn" was intended but that's less important than fixing the carpark access. My bad!
❤️‍🔥 (2026-06-28 01:23:03+00:00): no worries, looks like someone else has already refined this area, and modelled the various turn-restrictions like this one: https://osm.org/relation/21023626
kingkingHK (2026-06-20 14:06:04+00:00): Hi there, to denote urban vs NT taxi stands, simply use `taxi=private` + `taxi:HK:Urban=yes` or `taxi:HK:NT=yes`. Hope this helps!
vectorial8192 (2026-06-23 12:23:14+00:00): Thanks for the help.

It seems this is not on the wiki, so, yet another Discord discussion.
vectorial8192 (2026-06-23 12:24:57+00:00): Still, improved with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184474687
kingkingHK (2026-06-23 13:39:19+00:00): At least, it's what Kovoschiz told me: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180237869
dermoth_ (2026-06-21 20:00:22+00:00): Bon je viens de réaliser comment sont indiqués les sens inverses, je vais remettre cycleway:left=lane
ZioDragon (2026-06-21 06:07:02+00:00): The expressway has now been expanded to 6 lanes, so the current version is no longer suitable. Please revert to the previous version.
CAM-Gerlach (2026-06-20 22:38:51+00:00): NB, incorrectly deleted highway=* restored and tagged correctly as a private driveway in changeset 184370058

https://osm.org/changeset/184370058
pitscheplatsch (2026-06-20 18:34:57+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
Is the added name real?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4451203
alblov (2026-06-20 19:44:13+00:00): Hi. I don't understand at which name you refer to, because the link send me to a way in Germany
pitscheplatsch (2026-06-21 05:40:09+00:00): Sorry, it should be https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/445120315/history/3
MarcoR (2026-06-21 08:57:25+00:00): Se si tratta di un indirizzo email personale possiamo chiedere che venga rimosso completamente (altrimenti rimarrebbe nella cronologia del percorso)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184354209
alblov (2026-06-21 14:08:20+00:00): Ok d'accordo, io avevo inserito un gruppo di nodi, non capisco perché è stato salvato e nominato un percorso con la mail.
MarcoR (2026-06-22 13:31:06+00:00): Probabilmente un copia & incolla errato oppure un'estensione o il browser stesso che ha auto-completato la casella del nome.

Buon mapping,
Marco.
eggie (2026-06-20 19:39:47+00:00): Top!
vietnam321 (2026-06-20 14:06:45+00:00): This changeset has wrong source and comment. My mistake.
donux-nl (2026-07-09 09:19:11+00:00): Dag, openingstijden zijn niet juist geformuleerd. Zie de wiki hierover. osm.wiki/Key:opening_hours

Een handig tooltje is https://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/
donux-nl (2026-07-09 09:21:47+00:00): Ik heb ze voor Bie Mieke gecorrigeerd. Groeten, Donux
gurglypipe (2026-06-20 15:02:39+00:00): Looking good! Just a note — landuse=grass is meant for closely maintained areas of grass (like roundabouts, verges at corners on main roads, etc.). For areas around the railway which are less maintained (or unmaintained) you probably want natural=grassland.

That’ll give a bit more information about what kind of habitat it provides to wildlife.
a-sav (2026-06-21 13:53:03+00:00): Understood, will change now
gurglypipe (2026-06-21 15:52:37+00:00): Super, and thanks again for all the additions you’re doing around Barrow, it’s looking great :D
a-sav (2026-06-21 18:48:53+00:00): Thank you, I appreciate the feedback! It's my pleasure, seeing the map being populated with missing stuff is extremely satisfying
eggie (2026-06-20 19:42:40+00:00): Hoi,

Geef svp concreet aan wat je hebt gedaan.
Medemappers zullen dat op prijs stellen.

MVG
eggie
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-20 22:47:37+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with advertising/malformed tags and source=* of Google Maps, which is not allowed by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ), in changeset 184370579

https://osm.org/changeset/184370579
Colbertson (2026-06-20 16:03:48+00:00): man tik ilgi nesanāk uz renovēto rimi aiziet ka rīdzinieks paspēj pirmais
richlv (2026-06-20 17:01:02+00:00): Haha, es tieši nodomāju, ka ārpusei pret iekšpusi tik liels kontrasts :)

Bet tur vēl jāpārbauda, vai visiem ne-Rimi veikaliem tiešām vienāds darba laiks, kā uz durvīm rakstīts (piem., varbūt picērijai ir cits). Tos pārējos darbalaikus neliku nemaz.
Fidelis Assis (2026-06-30 22:25:30+00:00): Boa noite, GabiruX_. Este changeset 
introduziu relação administrativa de distrito para a Ilha de Alcatrazes que não é bairro nem distrito, mas pertence ao distrito de São Sebastião, no município de São Sebastião-SP;

Pode rever?
Fidelis Assis (2026-07-01 22:00:18+00:00): A relação r20987258 introduzida como do distrito "Boa Vista", também não está correta. Não existe distrito nessa ilha. A ilha  pertence ao distrito de São Sebastião, no município de mesmo nome em São Paulo.
Você pode rever/reverter?
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-20 22:48:08+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam tags/relations in changeset 184370579

https://osm.org/changeset/184370579
ftrebien (2026-07-01 13:24:19+00:00): Vandalismo: distritos e bairros inexistentes.
JeroenHoek (2026-06-20 18:54:51+00:00): So there's a gift shop still there, but it is not in business? That's what disused:shop=gift means.
Matthijs Kooijman (2026-06-20 20:26:17+00:00): This is what Streetcomplete did when I said "It's vacant". In reality, there is no longer a gift shop, and I think the building is for sale likely for housing instead of a ship, so I'll remove the tag manually.
ftrebien (2026-07-01 13:19:40+00:00): Vandalismo: construções inexistentes.
ftrebien (2026-07-01 13:22:50+00:00): Vandalismo: construções inexistentes.
ftrebien (2026-07-01 13:20:30+00:00): Vandalismo: construções inexistentes.
AndyB_66 (2026-06-20 16:01:08+00:00): revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184351387
ftrebien (2026-07-01 13:22:07+00:00): Vandalismo: distrito inexistente.
AndyB_66 (2026-06-20 16:21:15+00:00): revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184349228
Paweł_M (2026-06-20 17:51:44+00:00): Access=no był na moście, bo z uwagi na stan techniczny (konstrukcja moatu naruszona i most stoi pod kątem) oraz znak zakazu wjazdu most jest niebezpieczny do przejazdu. Widziałem go w terenie
Dalfsenaartje (2026-06-22 05:53:08+00:00): Graag deze op constructie laten staan aangezien ze aangelegd worden.
Jvitegem (2026-06-22 07:06:59+00:00): Maar een paar wegen worden momenteel aangelegd, de rest nog niet.
silversurfer83 (2026-06-20 18:37:31+00:00): HI there :)

you changed some water features here. I bet you did not wish to build a man_made=crane, right? Guess you were looking for water_tap

Also, the man_made=water_well you changed is described as cistern. Storage_tank is closer to the truth, then, isn't it?  https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/696035575 

safe travels

silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184361487
LonelyStrider (2026-06-21 17:38:29+00:00): Thanks a lot for your feedback. I'm quite new, so going to fix these now.
silversurfer83 (2026-06-21 17:59:03+00:00): Thanks for the quick reply.

Nothing wrong with being new as long as you show willingness to learn.

Welcome to OSM and if you have any questions just reach out :)
LonelyStrider (2026-06-21 18:02:34+00:00): Thank you!
pitscheplatsch (2026-06-20 18:35:42+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
Is the added name real?
eggie (2026-06-20 19:25:00+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
bicycle=dismount is juist bedoeld dat het wel blijft routeren. Je 'moet'alleen even afstappen.
Er is hier een gootje en dat zou moeten routeren met evt een paar 'strafpunten' in de voorkeur. Ligt aan de router.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Rob__1 (2026-06-20 21:02:21+00:00): OpenStreetMap (en dus ook RideWithGPS) routeren over de trap en dat is niet meest logische en gewenste route voor fietsers. Vrijwel iedereen volgt gewoon de Touwslagersweg. Is er een andere optie dan ramp:bicycle=no?
eggie (2026-06-20 21:14:53+00:00): Een gootje routeert.. Dat is de bedoeling.
.. bicycle=dismount routeert.. ook dat is de bedoeling.
Dat iets in jouw ogen ongewenst is is iets anders. We taggen groundtruth.
Dus niet iets gaan aanpassen om een bepaald effect te krijgen.
Het is aan de kaartenmaker die zn eigen scripts heeft wat de voorkeursroute is.
Dus niet een gootje verwijderen.
OSM is geen router en kort door de bocht ook geen kaart. Het is een database die de voorwaarden schept voor de routering. Er zijn wel routers die gebruik maken van de data van osm.
Wanneer RideWithGPS die keuze maakt is dat hun zaak.
Er zijn ook routers die bv strafpunten geven aan een gootje of kijken wat de kortste weg is.
eggie (2026-06-20 21:18:11+00:00): Valhalla doet het bv wel zoals jij wil.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_valhalla_bicycle&route=52.913233%2C4.79335%3B52.913043%2C4.793504#map=18/52.912837/4.792968
Osrm en graphhopper nemen de trap.
Keuze van de ontwikkelaar.
Nakaner (2026-06-22 08:22:40+00:00): Hallo,

das systematische Abschreiben von Verzeichnissen berührt das Datenbankschutzrecht. Hast du von AlpacaCamping die Erlaubnis erhalten, die Einträge nach OpenStreetMap zu übertragen? Wo ist diese dokumentiert?

Viele Grüße

Michael
Peter_v_Aalst (2026-06-22 09:34:33+00:00): Hallo Michael,
danke für den Hinweis. Das war mir nicht bewusst. Ich hatte lediglich recherchiert, dass Google Map und vergleichbare Kartendienste nicht als Quelle taugen. Ich hatte einige Nomady-Einträge rund um den Schillinger Berg gesehen und daraus leichtfertig abgeleitet, dass Nomady (analog Trekking-Camps -> Schwarzwald Tourismus etc.) als Quelle akzeptabel sei. 
Gerne kann ich die neu von mir erstellten Einträge morgen abend löschen (vorher schaff ich es leider nicht). Sofern die Ergänzungen und Aktualisierungen an bereits bestehenden Einträgen auch von solchen Urheberrechtsverletzungen betroffen sind, brauche ich aber leider Hilfe. Ich denke es ist niemandem geholfen, wenn ich diese Einträge lösche und mir ist nicht bekannt wie und ob ich nur die Änderungen rückgängig machen kann. 
Ich entschuldige mich für die entstandenen Umstände und werde mich in Zukunft besser über die rechtlichen Bestimmungen informieren.
Mfg Peter
eggie (2026-06-20 19:29:19+00:00): oneway=no gaat niet helpen, want de tag is hier junction=roundabout.
Die tag zal dan overal eraf moeten en worden vervangen door oneway=yes en deels oneway=no.

oneway=no zal dus de roundabouttag niet overrulen.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-06-20 19:38:24+00:00): Ik heb de junction roundabout verwijderd. Dat pakt anders verkeerd uit.

MVG
eggie
Rob__1 (2026-06-20 21:24:55+00:00): De routering volgt nog steeds de rotonde i.p.v. het twee richtingen fietspad. Op de 500m zuidelijker gelegen rotonde gaat het wel goed. Wat is het verschil?
Gr. Rob
eggie (2026-06-20 21:31:26+00:00): Het 'verschil' is dat de updates gewoon een paardagen vertraging hebben.
In de data staat het nu goed, maar GraphHopper heeft een paar dagen nodig en osrm nog veel langer. Meer dan een week.
Dus geduld.
De Openfietsmap bv krijgt elke zaterdag een update. KOMOOT EN OsmAnd hebben ook vertraging.
Wellicht kun je de update ergens vinden mbt jouw app.
eggie (2026-06-20 21:33:57+00:00): Deze even over een paar dagen testen.. dan zul je zien dat het werkt.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_bicycle&route=52.70029%2C4.819067%3B52.699413%2C4.818757
eggie (2026-06-20 21:44:42+00:00): Die zuidelijke 'fietsrotonde' staat niet als roundabout getagd. Dat doen we ook liever niet ivm de fietsrouterelaties.
Justin1234 (2026-06-24 22:05:51+00:00): Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap!

The building shapes look pretty accurate, but you should square them to make them neater. You can square by right clicking the building and clicking the square button, or by pressing Q while the building is selected. This will move the nodes around, so they are all 90-degree angles. Sometimes that can mess up your shape a little (like moving a corner away from where it needs to be), especially if the original shape wasn't drawn very square. If that happens, you can just move the incorrect nodes back to where you want them and square it again and it should square closer to the correct positions. You can also repeat that as many times as you want until it's how you want it.

Also, a very minor thing: when the imagery is at an angle, you can draw the roof and then move the building (Right click -> Move or press M with it selected) to be positioned at the base of the building; otherwise, it will be positioned where the roof is for that imagery's perspective instead of where the walls actually meet the ground. There are some images to visualize what I mean here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Roof_modelling#Drawing_at_the_roof
You usually do not need to worry much about this since these houses are not very tall, but it can help in situations like this
https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?node=13954508864#map=21/33.8305747/-78.8583149
where the mapped fence ends instead of connecting to the house, because the house shape is on the roof instead of the base of the building where the fence connects to.
bielebog (2026-07-14 20:59:31+00:00): Vor Ort sehe ich keine Änderung gegenüber dem Stand vom 16.6., sprich die angeschlagen Öffnungszeiten sowie die verwirrende Bezeichnung "Onkel's Markt" an der Tür sowie "Number One" über dem Eingang. Der "Berliner Markt" war hier früher mal, so heisst der aber lange nicht mehr.

Was war denn die Quelle für den Edit?
旧加卷 (2026-06-20 18:56:38+00:00): The source which you are using is lacking of information. Some facilities you added are already demolished. The coordinates you provided are completing unusable (e.g. node/13954345703 is having a 200km+ offset). leisure=playground is not the right tagging. The names that describe where they are do not reflect the elements you added.
Loopslol7 (2026-06-20 22:01:37+00:00): is public an unfavorable tag?
PizzaTreeIsland (2026-06-20 22:05:41+00:00): Yes, the correct one to be used for public areas is just access=yes. This is mostly important for routing engines or other 3rd party services that automatically parse the data, so having standard values is especially important for those. 
As with every openstreetmap tag value, you can make up any tags you like for cases which are not covered particularly well with the established standard values, but in this case, yes just does the job. 
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access for more on those values. 

Happy mapping!
Loopslol7 (2026-06-20 22:23:08+00:00): thank you for the quick response :D this helps with understanding access tagging.

Happy mapping!
Ma4G (2026-06-20 18:41:52+00:00): see https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5352685
NorthCrab_upload (2026-06-23 00:43:42+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1531071587

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
GerdP (2026-07-07 20:12:54+00:00): Moin!
Bitte füge keine Wegweiser,Karten oder ähnliches in die Knotenpunkt-Netzwerk-Relation wie https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11920039 ein. Die wird sonst mit hunderten oder gar tausenden Mitgliedern zu komplex.
ion_chi (2026-07-07 14:19:10+00:00): Hi Huong, I reverted this change because it looked like a node was accidentally dragged several blocks away https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185268857
Nnifria (2026-06-23 17:20:17+00:00): Привіт!
Будь ласка, не з'єднуй території (будь-якого типу) з дорогами, як-от, наприклад, way/1524919595.
Хоч це й невеликі нюанси, але потім дуже незручно виправляти помилки на мапі :)
pnorman (2026-06-23 05:10:17+00:00): Hello, please don't revert an edit that is under active discussion in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184342283
eerib (2026-06-23 15:56:57+00:00): Hello Pnorman, 

This was reverted because it appeared to be undiscussed automated edit that mass removed valid access tagging.

You're welcome to contact the Data Working Group for a second opinion.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Data_Working_Group#Contacts_in_case_of_problems

data@openstreetmap.org

Thank you, eerib
caprieldeluca (2026-06-20 21:15:34+00:00): Hola, gracias por la contribución. 
Revisé el conjunto de cambios y me parece que está bien. 
Cualquier consulta podés contactarnos en la comunidad OSM Argentina: https://t.me/osm_ar
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184366901
FatJackal (2026-06-20 20:21:01+00:00): Two Flock devices mounted in two separate poles side-by-side.
Paweł_M (2026-06-21 06:31:51+00:00): Supwr że dodajesz ścieżki w lesie. Ja nie mam czasu ich wszystkich sprawdzać, a pewnie sporo w okolicy brakuje
SENGAM (2026-06-21 07:02:04+00:00): bardzo dużo po okolicznych lasach jeżdżę rowerem i bardzo wielu ścieżek na mapach nie ma :)
ndf_maypole (2026-06-21 10:49:20+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue sur OpenStreetMap,

J'ai remarqué que vous aviez fait quelques erreurs dans les tags d'accès dans vos dernières contributions. Pour cela, je vous conseille de lire la page wiki à ce sujet (osm.wiki/FR:Key:access). 

Par ailleurs, il est aussi recommandé d'écrire un commentaire sur vos changements et d'indiquer vos sources, cela permet aux autres contributeurs de mieux comprendre ce que vous avez fait (osm.wiki/FR:Good_changeset_comments).

Pour plus d'infos générales, n'hésitez pas à consulter osm.wiki/FR:Comment_contribuer

Merci et bon mapping !
ndf_maypole