piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Vas111 (2024-10-20 10:21:18+00:00): Hello,
Why did you remove the motor vehicle restriction? There's a sign at the bottom of the street. Stagecoach has nothing to do with this.
Vas111 (2024-10-20 10:27:53+00:00): Why did you remove the restriction? It's a new bus gate and I added the exceptions which includes buses (psv).
Vas111 (2024-10-20 10:25:54+00:00): Buses are motor vehicles but 'psv' includes buses, so no need to remove the tag as the way has psv=yes already.
Khidistavi (2024-10-18 13:07:25+00:00): Reverted.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158050315
dval (2024-10-18 03:39:25+00:00): Вы внесли правки в перекресток "выезд из Карпинска на север и федеральная дорогаЭ. Не думаю, что это стоило делать. Есть в ОСМВики специальные правила оформления таких мест. Ответвления стоит рисовать, если они отделены от главной дороги физическим барьером, например, газоном или хотя бы металлическим барьером. В этом месте такого нет. Поэтому, думаю, два эти ответвления здесь неуместны. Все данные для навигаторов были уже внесены в отрезки дорог, примыкающих к точке их соединения. Внеся правки, вы к тому же разорвали сервисную дорогу, которая идет вдоль газопровода. Не знаю, как это повлияет на навигацию, если кто-то решить по сервайсу проложить свой маршрут, но факт разрыва есть.
dval (2024-10-18 03:51:50+00:00): Должен признать, что такую же ошибку с отворотами я совершил пять лет назад на перекрестке севернее, возле поворота на восток на Волчанск. К сожалению, не исправил ее до сих пор.
dval (2024-10-18 07:18:04+00:00): Еще одно: съезд с дороги должен иметь ту же важность, что и менее важная дорога. То есть на перекрестке рядом с Карпинском, съезд с транка на секондари должен быть секондари. Представьте, что на некоторых зумах более важная дорога видна, а менее -- нет. И вот в этом случае съезды будут также видны, если им присвоить свойства более важной дороги.
emersonveenstra (2024-10-18 11:36:46+00:00): Reverted for vandalism in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158046608, drawing buildings overtop of existing buildings
Leonard Ehrenfried (2024-10-17 22:20:11+00:00): This looks like a very nice and detailed changeset. Well done!

The only minor thing that I would perhaps fix is that not all ways are part of the station relation, but that's secondary.

If you wanted to test it, you could get the latest data from Geofabrik and test that OTP inteprets this correctly, for example by giving detailed instructions for cyclists and pedestrians.
emersonveenstra (2024-10-18 13:47:48+00:00): Hi there,

Thanks for the additions! For https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1324827931, the building tag should be the primary building type only. If there's multiple different organizations in that building, the best way to represent that is to create separate nodes (points) for each organization and put them on the building and then tag the building as building=government.
KellyKP (2024-10-21 20:33:13+00:00): Thank you, I have gone in and made those changes.
d3mol3k (2025-03-13 22:48:00+00:00): Nie Strzałowska Wiaduk nż tylko jak na stronie zditm: Strzałowska Wiadukt (59911) bez numeru przystanku
Vodevil_Mark (2025-11-28 20:03:29+00:00): Привет! Есть возможность узнать УНП/Юр. лицо, а ещё лучше номер в торговом реесте объекта?

Есть предположение, что это 
ЧТУП "Дашутка" УНП 690632419, рег. номер 332164, но отметить без доказательств не могу
Антон-1983 (2026-02-10 18:41:36+00:00): Не. Я там нескоро буду. Я искал родники - нашёл, вроде мне в той стороне больше ничего не надо)
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-06 04:17:03+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164574185
Karwan Sherwan (2024-10-17 19:07:44+00:00): گردی هەنارەییان
silversurfer83 (2024-10-17 19:06:18+00:00): Moin :)

das ist Silogebäude. 
https://kartaview.org/details/9018041/29
 Da lässt sich die Höhe entweder messen oder beim Betreiber erfragen.
Vielleicht denke ich ja mal dran, meinen Laser mit nach Fkb zu nehmen 

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158020555
SomeoneElse (2024-10-30 23:17:37+00:00): Hello jasonmiller2008 and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
Please use changeset comments that explain a bit more about you're doing - just "update" doesn't really help anyone.
Best Regards,
Andy
Nakaner (2024-11-28 09:31:35+00:00): Hallo,

du hast in diesem Änderungssatz einen Weg wiedereingetragen, der vom Benutzerkonto „Landesforst-Naturpark“ gelöscht worden war. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155575747 Dein Wiedereintragen ist nichts Schlechtes, wenn du den Weg selbst vor Ort gesehen hast.

Das nächste Mal möchte ich dich aber bitten, einen aussagekräftigeren/passenderen Änderungssatzkommentar zu verwenden.

Über die Löschungen wird derzeit im Forum diskutiert. Du bist eingeladen, dich dort an der Diskussion zu beteiligen. https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/wegeloschungen-durch-landesforst-niedersachsen/122232 (Login mit deinem OSM-Konto)

Viele Grüße

Michael
user_14840936 (2024-10-19 03:24:57+00:00): Давайте разукрасим всю Пермь (и не только Пермь) пешеходными дорожками, тротуарами, козьими тропами и проселочными дорогами... Если объект обозначен, как пешеходная зона (HIGHWAY=pedestrian), то какие там могут быть еще и тротуары?! Ах, да, позабыл: "изохроны пешеходной (лисапедной) доступности". Гы-гы-гы-гы-гы-гы!!!
Александр Синявский (2024-10-31 07:35:09+00:00): Добрый день!

Прикреплю скрины как работает навигация без тротуара и с ним. Это справедливо для любых приложений использующих карту OSM в своей основе.
https://disk.yandex.ru/a/WIPAEzVHjR8zew
AgusQui (2024-10-23 22:49:20+00:00): Es incorrecto el cambio de nombre de "Escalada" a "Avenida Escalada", el nombre no es igual en todos los tramos.
Johnny_Mappleseed (2024-10-24 13:33:00+00:00): Good morning, upon reviewing the 2024 imagery we collected recently, I have found that "Av or Avenida" is present and clearly signed along the whole length of the Escalada way in question. Our recently collected imagery is soon to be uploaded to Mapilary, please use that as a reference before reverting changes in the future. Thank you
plamen (2024-10-18 07:10:35+00:00): Thanks.
aTarom (2024-10-18 06:46:10+00:00): Hola, gracias por editar, puedes confirmarme que este collado
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12259313542/history
con name="Collado de la Salamandra" es correcto? en IGN figura como
"Collado de la Salamononda"
Saludos
ramonz (2024-10-18 15:58:54+00:00): 300 m al NE está el collado de la salamandra. el toponimico Salamononda es ciertamente extraño y no sería raro un error
 de transcripción, lo dejo como indica
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-10-24 03:19:12+00:00): BDOrtho IGN doesn't show anything here.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158022587
gnrc69 (2024-10-24 19:14:14+00:00): Bonjour, oui mais l'avion était bien présent le 10/10/2024 lorsque j'étais sur la base aérienne pour l'exibition de la patrouille de France.
YellowSoul (2024-10-25 11:13:16+00:00): Hallo, entlang der Mühldorfstraße ist ein baulicher Radweg. Durch deine Änderung wurde dieser entfernt. Bitte rückgängig machen.
seboyee (2024-10-25 17:25:05+00:00): Hi, danke für den Hinweis! Ist korrigiert. Sorry für die Umstände.
rebbia75 (2024-10-17 19:05:19+00:00): J'ai oublié de mettre ma source
https://laurafoot.fff.fr/competitions?competition_id=420183&poule=1&match_id=28437364 (en espérant qu'elle convient à l'esprit OSM)
NorthCrab_upload (2024-10-17 19:20:51+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8330840843
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1324843639

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
habi (2024-10-21 20:45:36+00:00): Dieser Defi wurde mit level=WG erfasst.  Da ich nicht annehme, dass im Hoval-Gebäude eine WG wohnt, habe ich den zu level=EG geändert...
ScottNelson (2024-10-21 15:20:58+00:00): I think technically the road to Madeley Lake is not a forest service road anymore, since it was transferred to  Whistler Olympic Park with their lease.  I have no idea what it should be called though???
eerib (2024-10-21 17:57:52+00:00): Good catch. The road was marked retired by the Ministry of Forests in 2012 so it is no longer a forest service road.

Unfortunately, the Province has a mess of road data so there is no authoritative a dataset for roads to get updated data from. Generally in cases like this, I go with the last name for the road or whatever is posted in-person.

However, the Whistler Olympic Park has published maps and calls it "Madeley Road" so that is likely what it is signed as in-person and listed as in internal government maps.

https://www.whistlerolympicpark.com/sites/default/files/2024-07/WOP-SummerMap-v4-23July.pdf

So I've changed it to:

name=Madeley Road
&
old_name=Madeley Forest Service Road

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158181462

Feel free to change it if you see something different in-person. I don't normally visit this area so likely won't visit in-person for at least a few years.

Cheers, eerib
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-10-23 21:29:35+00:00): reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158272083
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-10-23 21:37:29+00:00): Changes are fine. Changeset was included in reversion to avoid conflicts. Consider using a reverter to avoid missing things in the incorrect changeset. Also consider commenting on the incorrect changeset and reporting users who add fictional data.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-10-23 21:38:07+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Osm-revert
starsep (2026-05-15 09:55:29+00:00): Czy jesteś pewny, że te odcinki ulicy nazywają się Jana Kazimierza?

Wydaje mi się, że nie mają nazwy. Budynki mają adresy przy Jana Kazimierza. Wydaje mi się, że adresy wynikają z historycznie dużych działek, które miały dostęp do Jana Kazimierza
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:17:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
Vít Pošmourný (2024-11-03 21:33:55+00:00): There is no longer a path, only a forest.
gpserror (2024-10-17 21:35:48+00:00): IMHO merging POIs with their buildings should not be done if you're not sure they also own the building.  If they're renting or don't know I'd leave it as POI.
gpserror (2024-10-17 21:36:24+00:00): And of course, sharing is the third category...but that's kind of a given...
Hypsometric (2024-10-18 14:47:06+00:00): Thanks for the input. Its good to hear from someone with a lot of edits. I'll take that in to consideration.

It doesn't outright say one way is correct over the other but I take the "One feature, one OSM element" good practice principle (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element) to be if there is one occupant of a building, the tags should be added to the building. If multiple business occupy a building then it gets points for each occupant.

This explanation is also what I base that on: https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/22962/should-i-use-pois-or-areas-to-identify-shops

Once you start looking at buildings, this can sometimes get a little grey. I think of buildings with a business below and unnamed apartments above. It gets a little odd to map.

Thanks again for the input :-)
gpserror (2024-10-19 21:48:35+00:00): I don't agree with occupant vs building.  There are special cases where the building may be historic and actually has a name -- but the shop is different than the historic name of the building -- and this would make it very difficult to map both without my method of building not merged with shop.

Just a comment about "both" -- meaning both a node and an area -- the intent was having the area marked as a shop and have the poi marked as a shop -- this is double tagging and is very frowned upon.  However if the building is a building and the shop is a node, this is no longer "both" and it also opens the possibility for multiple shops in the building.

Yes the apartment complex + shops at level 1 is actually very common and becoming more common in high pop areas.  I tag the building as apartments and put however many POI shops on the building.  This should be fine too.
gpserror (2024-10-19 22:24:14+00:00): I just spotted another error: the Kum & Go at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/688751094 - This is a "roof" building at layer 1, and if you merge the gas station to the roof, the gas station is at layer 1...which is nonsensical as it's at layer 0(or no layer tag).  So this is another example not to merge the two.  I changed it back while changing it to a Maverik as the station has rebranded -- as witnessed in a drive by.  Actually it's been a Maverik for a few months, I don't know why I haven't noted and changed it...
pitscheplatsch (2024-10-18 05:32:01+00:00): Hi anonymous12313, welcome to OSM.

Were you not satisfied with your map edits?

This changeset partly reverts her/his own map edits of https://osm.org/changeset/157937304
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:22:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:13:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
Berlin53 (2024-12-11 13:18:09+00:00): Hallo momabebra, hier sind keine Parkbuchten. Hier wird am Straßenrand geparkt.
Frans S (2024-10-19 10:46:18+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please take the notes about mapping high buildings (see comment section) into account when you map high buildings. 
Short. Just map over the roofline and mow the whole to its footprint.
Best regards
Khidistavi (2024-10-18 05:41:57+00:00): Reverted.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158034780
Jochen Topf (2024-10-19 09:46:58+00:00): I am not sure I am on the right changeset here, but there were several problematic changes to the coastline in northern Russia around this area. The coastline moved quite a lot, you can see that here  https://osmdata.openstreetmap.de/internal/coastline/ . I am not familiar with that area but just looking at it it seems that that large river delta is at least partially tidal and should therefore be classified as ocean water, not inland water as it was before. For the time being coastline processing is halted until this issue is resolved.
Noro Hibu (2024-10-19 23:28:59+00:00): Hello. I am in the process of editing and refining the coastline here, so for convenience I have drawn a rather rough version a few days ago. But at the moment I have corrected it, made it more accurate. In the future I plan to refine it further. Given the volume of work, this is not a quick process.
Jochen Topf (2024-10-20 07:35:25+00:00): The problem is that while you are working on this coastline processing for the whole world is stopped. So most maps are not updated with current coastlines until this is resolved. This does not affect only your coastline changes but all coastline changes anywhere.
streckenkundler (2024-10-17 20:59:35+00:00): Quelle der Adresse?
rempshaener (2024-10-18 06:46:13+00:00): Hallo,
am Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37731227 war letztes Jahr die Kombination DE:250,DE:1020-12 angebracht.
Wurde die Beschilderung geändert? Ansonsten würde deine Änderung keinen Sinn ergeben.
Viele Grüße
Aim311_ (2024-10-18 08:44:18+00:00): 2 lata temu już była zmieniana na primary (zmiana została wycofana), więc ta obwodnica nie pełni swojego zadania dopiero od 9.2023 roku, tylko od czasu kiedy została oddana do użytku.
hetdrnxjdxgtb (2024-10-18 10:05:31+00:00): Wtedy mogło to być przedwczesne. Rok temu została domknięta obwodnicą Chełmca DK28, bez której rola tranzytowa N-S mogła być ograniczona. Teraz nie ma wątpliwości.
rskedgell (2024-10-17 23:18:26+00:00): Thanks. They probably ought to be changed back to highway=service rather than the highway=unclassified another mapper used as well.
rempshaener (2024-10-18 07:36:34+00:00): Hallo,
beim Stichwort "Test" werde ich hellhörig.
Du hast einen Parkplatz mit deiner Änderung unbrauchbar gemacht.
Ich nehme an, das war ein Versehen?
Viele Grüße
rempshaener (2024-10-20 11:21:15+00:00): geändert mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158123811
Robert46798 (2024-10-26 20:20:37+00:00): Hallo,
ich wollte mir das auch gerade ansehen; Allerdings ist "Parkplatz" hier vermutlich auch nicht richtig. Hier scheinen zwar hin und wieder mal Panzer zu parken (https://airsofthelden.com/events/lost-airfield/), aber dass das ein "echter" Parkplatz sein soll, wage ich zu bezweifeln.
Vielleicht mag rempshaener uns etwas aufklären?

Viele Grüße,
Robert
rempshaener (2024-10-26 22:15:53+00:00): Hallo,
ich kann zur weiteren Aufklärung nichts beitragen, tut mir leid.
Ich musste abwägen zwischen "kaputt" (wegen amenity="HQ - Rot") und "ist vielleicht nicht ganz richtig". In diesem Fall war ein Revert für mich die naheliegende Variante.
Viele Grüße
Robert46798 (2024-10-27 20:49:44+00:00): Sorry, ich meinte auch JEEFFFF. Ich würde das noch etwas offen lassen und schauen ob er sich meldet.
streckenkundler (2024-10-17 21:22:50+00:00): Quelle?
sanchi (2024-10-18 07:50:01+00:00): Hola.
Esto no es una vía de servicio. Que este asfaltada no significa que sea una vía de servicio, un track también puede estar asfaltado.
Mira la wiki para mas información.
Un saludo
streckenkundler (2024-10-17 21:23:25+00:00): Quelle?
santamariense (2024-10-25 01:12:01+00:00): Olá.

Estive revisando sua edição. Instruções de aprimoramento:
* Essas estradas rurais, interligando localidades, devem ser mapeadas como highway=unclassified. Já, se for acesso da propriedade à via pública, a tag mais adequada é highway=service + service=driveway.

Querendo tirar dúvidas e engajar com a comunidade, sugiro os canais do Telegram listados nesta wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Canais_para_contato

Bons mapeamentos!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158026553
czebureks (2024-11-12 21:21:12+00:00): Cześć! Ciąg łączący ul. Lawendowe Wzgórze z ul. Porębskiego wydaje się być jednak ciągiem pieszo-rowerowym, a nie zwykłym chodnikiem z dopuszczonym ruchem rowerowym. Z czego wynika Twoja interpretacja?
stasiu512 (2024-11-12 21:25:14+00:00): Cześć, wskazuje na to oznakowanie pionowe z obydwóch stron (C16 + T22) :)
stasiu512 (2024-11-12 21:29:36+00:00): Na szybko znalazłem zdjęcia z poziomu ulicy w Apple Maps, załączam zrzuty ekranu, przepraszam że z telefonu ale w tym momencie jest to moja jedyna opcja - https://files.fm/u/ymsfp8zwb9
czebureks (2025-09-30 07:58:34+00:00): Cześć! Byłem tam wczoraj i teraz już jest na pewno C-16/C-13 poziomy z obu stron. To chyba zmieniamy z powrotem na te "designated"?
stasiu512 (2025-09-30 08:40:52+00:00): Cześć, w takiej sytuacji jest to wskazane :)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:22:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:13:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:15:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
gmar5 (2024-10-18 07:17:50+00:00): Hello Mike. Apologies, can you explain what you did here? Did you just remove the turn restrictions of the bus gate (which still exists as far as I am aware), or are they mapped in another way?
user_3828331 (2024-10-18 08:16:35+00:00): I changed the turn restriction so routing agents for buses can use it. There is no way to code bus only turn restrictions as far as I'm aware so it's only possible to change the turn restriction to enable it to work.
user_3828331 (2024-10-18 08:25:07+00:00): I've reverted it back as I did it incorrectly anyway! Need to do some more checking on how I can get bus turns to work correctly without it impacting normal traffic
gmar5 (2024-10-18 10:14:12+00:00): The previous state of the relation was:

name=Folly Bridge Bus Gate
source=https://www.oxfordshire.gov.uk/residents/roads-and-transport/parking/parking-and-bus-gate-fines/bus-lanes-and-bus-gates
type=restriction
restriction=only_left_turn
except=psv;bicycle

The "except" key is documented on the wiki as the way to do what you are pointing at. "psv" includes buses. Was it not working?
dval (2024-10-18 03:18:56+00:00): В северной части бывшей ж.д., рядом с Обогатительной улицей, вы провели ее вэй по некоторым точкам ранее нарисованного леса. То есть поправить лес и при этом не затронуть дорогу не получится: сначала надо будет эти два вэя разделить, а затем уже только править лес. Таким образом вы создаете проблемы следующим мэпперам при будущих правках. Просьба учитывать это в будущем.
sanchi (2024-10-18 07:55:23+00:00): Hola.
Por favor deja de mover los puntos de las poblaciones sin sentido. No es la primera población en la que lo mueves medio metro sin hacer más cambios.
Un saludo
aharvey (2025-01-28 10:45:30+00:00): Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F

Based on this guidance even if the trails have no public access, we still include them in OpenStreetMap data but with the appropriate tags setting no public access.
toster234 (2024-10-17 22:21:36+00:00): Proszę gdy mapujesz podjazdy na terenie posesji ustaw dostęp jako prywatny i zakończ linię. Od bramy do połączenia z ulicą zacznij nową linię i tu podjazd zostaw tak jak jest domyślnie czyli publiczny.
toster234 (2024-10-17 22:22:20+00:00): Przykład: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1317577393
Luniew (2024-10-18 09:01:28+00:00): Dziękuję za radę, poprawilem zgodnie z nią drogę.
englu (2024-10-23 13:16:31+00:00): Czy na tej ścieżce nie było niebieskiego szlaku pieszego? Teoretycznie biegnie właśnie tamtędy.
Luniew (2024-10-23 13:30:46+00:00): 14 lipca jechałem tam rowerem : na aplikacji komoot masz tą trasę opublikowaną pt Na Klementowice, nick Lunie. Musiałem zawrócić bo w miejscu ścieżki były tylko uprawy, no chyba że ktoś puści się na przełaj.
englu (2024-10-23 13:46:58+00:00): Dzięki za odpowiedź. Trasy nie znalazłem, mógłbyś podesłać link?
Luniew (2024-10-23 14:02:55+00:00): https://www.komoot.com/tour/1709297224?ref=aso
streckenkundler (2024-12-24 22:12:32+00:00): Hei,

...im Nachhinein vermute ich, daß du zu schnell warst... Aber egal... :)

ich hab eben die 62,5m-Linie für den Cottbuser Ostsee eingepflegt...

Sie CS https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160588434

Ich hab so gut es geht versucht, in JOSM mittels "Geometrie ersetzen" zu arbeiten.. Es dürften zu mindestens keine geometrischen Fehler entstanden sein...

Schau doch mal bitte, ob es so passt...

Grüße aus dem Spreewald,

Sven
ChrissW-R1 (2024-12-30 01:40:34+00:00): Hi Sven,

tut mir leid, aber ich stehe gerade etwas auf dem Schlauch. Was meinst du mit "zu schnell" und was soll ich genau prüfen?

Grüße
Chriss