piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-16 16:40:24+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/762537716
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/954328959
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1146669651
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1146669652
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1146669653
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1146669658
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1146669660
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1146669661
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1146669662
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1146669663
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1146669672
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1146669673

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
marczoutendijk (2023-02-17 15:34:59+00:00): Again! What changes did you perform?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
marczoutendijk (2023-02-17 15:38:08+00:00): Maybe you should get more connected to OpenStreetMap?
Jayden26 (2023-04-23 20:17:26+00:00): Nice joke. I did'nt know  what OpenStreetMap was when I started this January!
Jayden26 (2023-04-23 20:17:59+00:00): Also, thanks for the link
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-16 17:04:14+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/810080329
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1146694280
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1146694302

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o miejscowości.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1146694288

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Górski-Kalwaryjczyk (2023-02-17 07:57:41+00:00): Poprawiłem.
NorthCrab (2023-02-17 08:47:37+00:00): Dzięki!
GinaroZ (2023-03-24 19:31:58+00:00): What's the correct opening date meant to be as it's not going to be next week ;)
Shaun das Schaf (2023-02-17 21:01:14+00:00): Hallo himbie, willkommen bei OSM!

Wenn du im Editor ein Gebäude auswählst und dann die Taste "Q" drückst, wird das Gebäude automatisch rechtwinklig gemacht. Im Moment sehen die von dir bearbeiteten Gebäude alle noch ein bisschen krumm und schief aus.

Magst du das noch korrigieren?

Danke und viele Grüße
Shaun das Schaf
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-04-22 14:01:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135228709, 135225625 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to fictional edits.
JeroenvanderGun (2023-02-16 17:04:03+00:00): old tag value: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/maxspeed%3Atype=DE%CB%90rural#characters

new tag value: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/maxspeed%3Atype=DE%3Arural#characters
emersonveenstra (2023-02-16 18:01:39+00:00): Hi,

Looks like you left the planned:amenity tag on the node. Could you please remove that? Thanks!
bobjones1 (2023-02-17 13:54:15+00:00): Thanks, this has been fixed
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-04-22 14:02:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135228709, 135225625 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to fictional edits.
Frans S (2023-02-20 12:53:35+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but you're mapping quality need some improvements.
Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings not mapped accurate and following the rooflines.
Nearly all rectangular buildings are not squared.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132638870
Frans S (2023-02-20 12:59:56+00:00): Hello again.
Please read this wiki how and where to use the tag "track"
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highways#Roads_and_tracks
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132638870
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-16 18:29:20+00:00): Please do not add non-existent cart paths,  This edit is being reverted as appropriate.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-03-02 00:43:01+00:00): Reverted by DWG as undiscussed import from undisclosed sources: changeset/133192444
emersonveenstra (2023-02-16 17:56:47+00:00): Hi,

Looks like you added a duplicate leisure=golf_course here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10671074204#map=16/43.8074/-82.8935 and a duplicate golf=tee here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10671116888

Could you please delete those? Thanks!
Geo-Tobi (2025-04-09 11:47:25+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/635956297
Du hast hier HW auf footway geändert, aber traffic_sign 240 stehen lassen. Bitte um Korrektur.
Wegeschlenzer (2025-04-09 17:50:24+00:00): komisch, bei mir wird Miche101 als letzter Bearbeiter von vor ca. 2 Jahren angezeigt.
Habs korrigiert.
Geo-Tobi (2025-04-09 18:08:29+00:00): Im Änderungsverlauf https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/635956297 ist ersichtlich, dass das footway von dir kam, vor zwei Jahren (während Vz240 schon gesetzt war). :-)
Wegeschlenzer (2025-04-09 18:31:38+00:00): da war ich noch nicht so getrimmt durch dich... :-)
Aber wahrscheinlich werden mir trotzdem immer wieder Fehler unterlaufen - hoffentlich weniger...
emersonveenstra (2023-02-16 18:05:37+00:00): Hey, just as a heads up, the tourism=apartment tag is sort of a confusing tag, it's meant for vacation apartments, not a normal apartment complex, you want building=apartments for that.
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2023-02-18 13:43:05+00:00): Du har lavet en ny vej/areal https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1146732426

Men det ville være mere korrekt og nemmere i stedet bare at sætte landuse=meadow
på vejen:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/357465647

Som findes i forvejen og er inner i forest-relationen.
Leif Lodahl (2023-02-18 17:00:30+00:00): Tak Niels,
Jeg øver mig lidt.
Frans S (2023-02-19 09:08:41+00:00): 
Hello. Thanks for mapping on this difficult task.
About mapping of tall (high) buildings.  

Mapping of tall buildings differs from standard buildings. Because the imagery is taken at an angle, you see both the roof lines and also the side of a building. 
How do you map such a building?
Map over the roof lines and lastly slide the mapped building to the footprint.
Here is a video how that is done.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1V5-bADsYiffCD9bo6l64YOdTvmKqMGry/view?usp=share_link

And.... don't forget to square each rectangular building.

Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2023-02-25 15:54:34+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, during the validation process
I noticed that you are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.
We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.
Each rectangular building need to be squared. !! 
Nodes of buildings may not connect to other buildings or features.
The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 
Do not cluster buildings.!! 
 Each building need to be mapped individually.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
checht (2023-02-16 17:56:49+00:00): Accidental, please ignore!
checht (2023-02-16 17:57:34+00:00): Fixed this edit in 132640890
daniel_k (2023-03-15 11:40:32+00:00): Der Name "Sülzen" ist keine willkürliche Erfindung aus der Zeit des Ersten Weltkriegs, sondern erscheint bereits auf einer Karte von 1884. Guck mal hier: https://www.deutschefotothek.de/documents/obj/90011270/df_dk_0000532_0585
Daher würde ich die Änderung rückgängig machen
sokol15 (2023-02-16 20:02:38+00:00): Ahoj, tohle rozhodně není ve výstavbě. Pokud je skutečně v dané trase připravovaná trať, musí být proposed. Viz https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:proposed
Urbis96 (2023-02-17 13:50:38+00:00): Ahoj, díky za upozornění, opraveno.
woodpeck_repair (2023-02-16 18:21:25+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset .
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-18 07:57:38+00:00): Why did you change very valid roadways/driveways into cartpaths?
MxxCon (2023-02-16 23:18:01+00:00): Hello.
Please note that you made a mistake here. When dealing with buildings that are constructed as relations, all tags must be on relations themselves. Elements that define outer and inner parts of building should be tagless lines. You can read more about it here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:building
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132642705
aceman444 (2023-03-05 00:08:09+00:00): Hi, thanks for the additions.
But, why is this small building part "college" while others are university? Also, it is hard to say what is the constructional difference between university and college building. ('Building' tag specifies how a building is constructed (how it looks like), not how it is used).
FelixMiaWixen (2023-03-05 16:35:51+00:00): I believe this must've been a mistake on my part. I'm not sure how many of the buildings I marked, but this entire building should be labelled as "college". Is there a way to correct this?
Benoît C MdP (2023-02-17 09:15:33+00:00): Bonjour Evan

Pourquoi as tu supprimé sur ce tronçon https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/682020603 l'information comme quoi la bande cyclable à gauche est à sens unique en sens opposé au sens principal de la voie ?
Je corrige

Bonne continuation

Benoît
Wulfmorn (2023-02-17 11:37:11+00:00): Actually these are supposed to be separated. The old camping site has been demolished and for some time the roads there we just cut off. I'll try to get rid of the demolished roads.
Bobropiton (2023-03-05 14:03:58+00:00): Приветствую. К сожалению Ваша поправка "кривая". Во-первых, маршрут не соответствует схеме Public transport version 2(в маршрут не вписан подходящий тэг). Подробнее здесь: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?oldid=625726

Во вторых-перепутаны местами остановки. 
В третьих-имеется разрыв по пути следования.

Через ID редактор невозможно корректно работать с этой схемой. Если в дальнейшем вы захотите редактировать общественный транспорт- Вам потребуется установить для этих целей JOSM. Будет интересно-скину Вам обучающие ролики по нему.

И да. "Спасибо" за удаление точки stop_position у Метро Теплый Стан. Из-за данного удаления сломался маршрут.
German Ivanov (2023-03-05 15:45:23+00:00): Здравствуйте. Извините за данные ошибки, никогда до этого не приходилось работать с маршрутами. Спасибо Вам за развернутый ответ и внесенные правки. Больше транспорт редактировать я не планирую (это был единственный сильно устаревший маршрут, которым я пользуюсь), но спасибо за предложение.
felipeeugenio (2023-02-16 23:39:32+00:00): Hola.
Si seleccionas el edificio, puedes cuadrarlo con la letra Q. quedan así con ángulos rectos.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132644677
user_5359 (2023-03-26 06:44:24+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on  http://www.osm.org/node/10610399914. I was just wondering if you can even enter whether you have to pull or push on a door that you can usually operate from both sides. Because it is 50% wrong. Moreover, the key is poorly chosen (not only from OSM point of view).better would be opening direction or if it goes more in the direction of evaluation: something like are "the rule observed".
rarad74 (2023-02-16 20:01:35+00:00): Hi. If you have a gpx track for this , please upload it to openstreetmap server. Thanks.
ConnorMaps (2023-02-17 16:56:45+00:00): Hi, rarad74. I don't have any GPX tracks for this area. Happy Mapping!
felipeeugenio (2023-02-16 23:40:59+00:00): Hola. Así se llama la casa de acogida? o es su casa?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132645216
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-16 19:50:28+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/835286576
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1146774262

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Frans S (2023-02-20 11:35:12+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
Your mappings are rather accurate, but not all rectangular buildings are fair squared. Please square each building with the Q key (rectangular buildings only)
Best regards and keep mapping
ironalloy (2023-02-20 18:48:06+00:00): Thanks for the notice, I think now those are fixed.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-16 20:10:34+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/487958364

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
gscholz (2023-02-25 08:21:52+00:00): Hi Luisa,
thsiichangeset has created several errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-67.09582&lat=-17.95209&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=132646464

As you may know, this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps.
Can you please fix this?

You may also like to contact your colleges using the hashtag "#colegiosalesiano" to join your improvement activities.
Kind regards
Guido
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-16 20:20:23+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3810016636
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/397945678

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
silversurfer83 (2023-02-17 06:45:27+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OSM :)
According to your changeset count you're pretty new, so I'd like to say hello.

And I'd like to take this opportunity to give you some advice on how to maybe be a "better" contributor:

1st: please stay local with your edits. I checked your recent contributions and they are ALL OVER the planet. This is rather irritating to other people who keep an eye on "their" neck of the woods. Maybe check out this article in the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

2nd: You added some double entries to the database. I took the info you added to the Ration Shop and added it to the already existing "way" of the same name and deleted the double. Please make sure to edit existing entries before adding new entries.

3rd: Please give sources to your changes. Where did you get your info? It's helpful for other users, too.

4th: adhere to these guidelines, please: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

5th: Any questions (I am so sure, there are some), don't hesitate. Theres plenty of people in plenty of digital places: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contact_channels#Chats.2Fmessengers

You can answer to these comments by clicking on the link in the email.

And most importantly: Keep in touch, when someone reaches out and
happy mapping :)

silversurfer83
Masohpotato (2023-02-17 17:37:30+00:00): okay, thank you for informing me i'll try to be better about that in future.
silversurfer83 (2023-02-17 17:49:08+00:00): Thanks for replying :)

As long as there is a future for you and meaningful contributions to osm I'm looking forward to see more of those
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-02-17 14:00:52+00:00): dodam że można noname=yes dodać jak rzeczywiście nazwy nie ma by walidator się nie czepiał
moje_konto (2023-02-17 08:55:16+00:00): Tak, mniej więcej tutaj są ruiny, niedawno zrobiłem zdjęcie, by kiedyś dodać, choć nie miałem informacji czego pozostałością są.

Dokładność pozycji można poprawić używając jako podkładu rzeźby terenu.

A znacznik najlepiej zmienić na ruiny, zwykły przemysłowy jest na aktualne użytkowanie. Na Wiki są opisy znaczników.

Mam z tego rejonu kilka zdjęć, pewnie za jakiś czas coś tutaj zedytuję, więc mogę też ten obiekt poprawić.
Adrion (2023-02-17 18:39:14+00:00): Hi! Is the end of Morris Road actually known as "Dead end" or is it just a dead end? If the latter, maybe noexit=yes (if you can't even walk beyond it) or/and some kind of barrier, instead of the name on the end node?
ul-tp-osm (2023-02-17 07:08:53+00:00): Bonjour,

Il s’agissait bien d’un doublon à corriger, cependant l’étudiant qui a effectué la manip a soulevé le problème qu’il n’est pas possible de retrouver cet aquarium facilement en passant par Overpass. Il est en effet référencé comme musée sur OSM, mais aucun attribut spécifie la présence d’aquarium.

Axel.
L'imaginaire (2023-03-12 19:03:14+00:00): 👍
Frans S (2023-03-06 12:34:22+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, during the validation process
I noticed that you are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.
We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. Just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.
Please map each building accurate over the rooflines.
Square each rectangular building with the Q key.
Nodes of buildings may NOT  connect to other buildings or features.
The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 
Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132647637
Frans S (2023-02-17 10:35:42+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project
Your mappings are rather accurate, however, not all rectangular buildings have been squared with the Q key.
Please keep that in mind at future mappings.
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2023-02-19 12:24:57+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project and welcome you as a new mapper.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards. No problem. New mappers often make the same errors. We are here to assist you.
Please pay attention to next points:
Most buildings are rectangular and need to be mapped accordingly. Look for shadows which shows the beginning and the end of a building. Don't include the shadow and square each rectangular building with the Q key.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132647876
Frans S (2023-02-27 14:25:34+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, during the validation process
I noticed that you are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.
We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.
Each rectangular building need to be squared. !!  Q key when still selected
Nodes of buildings may not connect to other buildings or features.
The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 
Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132648024
Frans S (2023-03-08 09:53:45+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, during the validation process
I noticed that you are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.
We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. Just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.
Please map each building accurate over the rooflines.
Square each rectangular building with the Q key.
Nodes of buildings may NOT  connect to other buildings or features.
The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 
Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132648099
Frans S (2023-02-17 15:09:01+00:00): Hello. Welcome to the OSM mappers world.
I am reviewing mappings to check if they comply with our standards and the instructions of the project.
A few remarks here.
You mapped a very windy trace as a residential highway.
When you take a good look (and have experience) you will see that this is a (dry) waterway, stream. No need to map it here.
You can see a fair trace coming from an adjacent road leading to the farm. Since that is the only access, this can be tagged as highway=service (I change it).
The tag residential is only to be used in villages, towns. Here, depending on the quality and width , unclassified (most common) paths (narrow<2 mtr) and tracks.(not required here)
You tagged an area around a few buildings as farmland.  Not correct. I removed it.
Last issue. Do no connect nodes of a road to other features than roads.
Best regards and success with mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132648107
Frans S (2023-03-06 12:07:51+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please don't map a trace without a shadow (which proofs that an object is above ground level) as a building.
The shadow is not a part of a building.
In 1 case, you mapped a complete yard as 1 building. The buildings inside need to be mapped as individual buildings.
Best regards
adrianojbr (2023-02-16 22:25:01+00:00): Inclusive na imagem da Maxar já não aparece mais a casa.