piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Wigharti (2024-03-07 15:53:24+00:00): Moin, hast Recht. highway=turning_loop wäre besser. Baum gibt es nicht mehr. Nur eine "grüne Insel".
Lt. Wiki "Eine Wendeschleife. Eine verbreiterte Fläche einer Straße mit einer nicht-überfahrbaren Mittelinsel, oftmals rund und am Ende einer Straße."

Dieses zackig etwas von Straße vorher war auch nicht richtig schön. Habe dann erst einen ordentlichen Kreis draus gemacht. Das wäre dann aber als Kreisverkehr interpretierbar, was es ja auch nicht ist.
flohoff (2024-03-07 16:44:37+00:00): Lies dir das mit dem turning_loop nochmal durch. Eine Straßenschleife wird bevorzugt
NeisBot (2024-03-19 15:45:48+00:00): Hello rafikm0h, thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.Please see https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments \n
Thanks!

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
Dimitar155 (2024-09-22 19:53:51+00:00): Hey whamno,

Are you sure that there is a Billa Express where you've placed it? I can't see any Billa shops on their website anywhere near the airport and personally I haven't seen or heard of "Billa Express" operating in Bulgaria. Only regular Billa and "Billa Dnes".

Cheers,
Dimitar
whammo (2024-10-10 10:20:10+00:00): Hi Dimitar, I'm not quite sure what I saw or what I was thinking at the time, so feel free to do what you think makes most sense!
alexey_zakharenkov (2024-03-08 09:12:58+00:00): Удалили информацию о названии ЖК. Возвращайте.
eggie (2024-03-07 15:59:24+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
gscholz (2024-03-09 06:50:38+00:00): Hi Lucas Marques,
your recent changesets have left behind several errors regarding self intersecting lines:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=36.08078&lat=47.23392&zoom=9&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=148347835

Can you please fix this?

Btw. you can avoid uploading such errors by using the internal validator of JOSM.

Kind regards
Guido
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-03-25 11:27:00+00:00): Reviewed
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148348608
sirorezka (2024-03-07 19:10:56+00:00): Добрый день, ссылка битая, и я не нашёл упоминания о данном POI. Извините, что спрашиваю, Вы сами выдумали это POI? Оно существует?
sirorezka (2024-03-07 19:12:51+00:00): а, сорри, нашёл упоминание о доме. Беру свои комментарий обратно.
sirorezka (2024-03-07 19:24:52+00:00): Я в таких случаях добавляю дому тег:
old_name=Дом Марконет
и добавляю ссылку на викидату
wikidata=Q118314274 (нашёл статью в викидате по поиску на карте, поправил в ней ошибки, сделал ссыку).

Ещё если совсем просто делать, то можно просто добавить дому теги:
old_name=Дом Марконет
historic=yes
tourism=yes
literan (2024-03-09 10:47:47+00:00): вообще, более корректно присвоить теги:
heritage=yes + heritage:name=Дом Марконет (это название объекта культурного наследия). Все же old_name это скорее для объектов, которые переименовали, и вот есть новое название в теге name, а вот и старое в теге old_name

поправлю
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-03-25 11:27:37+00:00): Reviewed
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148348869
SekeRob (2024-03-07 16:05:45+00:00): This was only a partial upload excluding a wood relation in WIP! Please do not try to correct while in WIP state!

thx
Dimitar155 (2024-03-07 19:54:53+00:00): Thank you for taking the time to survey the shops!

I know that it's a big mess of POIs. You can use Kyle's fork of iD (https://kyle.kiwi/iD). That fork of iD has filtering by tags in the data panel which allows you to filter by the level tag and change/add whatever is needed.

Cheers,
Dimitar
Fraxi (2024-03-07 20:15:03+00:00): Well done, Rhhs!
rhhs (2024-03-08 06:42:01+00:00): I did most of this with StreetComplete, and the main issue was that often quest pins of shops on different floors overlap and you have to go up/downstairs a lot... but it's a nice place to survey on a rainy day!
See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Indoor_Mapping#Apps
Dimitar155 (2024-03-08 07:54:02+00:00): These indoor editors are not powerful enough since they don't integrate with NSI and more often than not, after using one of them I have to go through 60-70 brand updates (if I entered the right category in the first place).

I've opened https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete/issues/5526.
saintam1 (2024-03-08 08:58:56+00:00): Wow, amazing!
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-06 07:14:37+00:00): Hello!

Note that you do not need to add description of feature type as a name.
For example when mapping tree it is enough to specify that it is a tree, no need for putting that name of this specific tree is "Tree".

So for buildings it is not needed to put Building as their name.

Or do you maybe know that this specific object mapped at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1179891664 is specifically named with such name?

And if it was mistake - can you edit map to remove this name?
    
Do not worry too much about this issue - I made way worse mistakes when I was starting. Maybe some tool or explanation is confusing? Why you added this name? Note that I am asking as maybe something can be fixed to be less confusing.
Frans S (2024-03-27 15:47:10+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. However, not all buildings squared.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148349774
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-03-25 11:26:34+00:00): Reviewed
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148349780
MxxCon (2024-03-12 01:42:24+00:00): Hello.
Is this no longer a 99cent store?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148349800
mcliquid (2024-03-07 16:54:52+00:00): Hi,

please note: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
dreua (2024-03-07 21:10:59+00:00): Can and did someone review this changeset? My tools fail due to the size. (If it can't be reviewed we should consider reverting.)

In general think this mistake could easily be prevented by improving iD: https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/9647
Yahya6nb (2024-03-07 22:50:39+00:00): Ok
fortera_au (2024-03-08 00:16:12+00:00): There was an extra node added to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/43393192, and two buildings added to an island in Western Australia. Doesn't look like it needs reverting.
map per (2024-03-20 19:50:59+00:00): @dreau: Changeset by Comparison Visualization (1) is a good tool for big changesets like this one

(1) https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=148349978#20/-25.79513/113.71396
Cebderby (2024-03-07 16:48:30+00:00): Si tratta chiaramente di una connessione telefonica/a banda larga. È sbagliato aggiungerlo come linea elettrica e pali. Si prega di rimuovere.
pboscherini (2024-03-08 16:37:29+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148349982
	Buongiorno 'Cebderby circa 19 ore fa',
	a quelle coordinate ci sono pali in legno e cavi elettrici, documento di seguito l'xml dei tag
	
	<tag k="cables" v="3"/>
	<tag k="power" v="minor_line"/>
	
	Come può notare il contenuto informativo di primo livello è 'cables' e 'power' e su database non c'è scritto 'telephone' oppure "band".
	Sono CERTO che ogni ingegnere in Gran Bretagna concorda sul fatto che "cavi" E "energia" possono far funzionare l'elettricità, il telefono, i collegamenti.
	
	Cordiali saluti,
	Piergiorgio.
Cebderby (2024-03-08 17:50:58+00:00): No meaningful reply, fiction reverted.  #DWG
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-03-25 11:43:26+00:00): All you edits have been reverted as I was unable to find any valid edit. Please have a look at these: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway#Highway https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Buildings https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mapillary
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148350323
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-03-25 11:44:20+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
NorthCrab_upload (2024-03-07 16:30:31+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11701238912
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11701238911
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11701238910
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11701238907
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11701238906
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11701238905
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11701238903
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11701238902
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11701238901
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11701238900
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11701238899
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11701238898
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11701238897
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11701238916
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11701225380
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11701225379
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11701238922
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11701238921
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11701238920
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11701238919
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11701238918
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11701238917
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11701238915
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11701238914
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11701238913
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/324974222
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/324974218
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1182712230
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/324974888
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/324974514
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/324996659
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/324996532
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/324996661
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/324974590
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/324996470
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/423790273
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/324996673
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/324996599
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/324996675
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/324996555
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/324996557
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/324974158
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/324996687
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/324974287
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/324996690
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/324996602
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/324996699
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/324996576
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/324996469
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/324996609

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Piskvor (2024-03-07 16:46:55+00:00): omylem spojeny dva changesety - tram Husitská a cesty podél Dřevnice
VictorIE (2026-06-12 08:27:06+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11014643/

A variety of buildings have postal_code=* instead of the usual addr:postcode=*

Some of it is a relation with type=associatedStreet
Some of it is just randomness.

About 350 objects across Northern Ireland: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2rwk
miluethi (2024-04-10 00:39:15+00:00): Alex, thanks for contributing to OSM. I notice that your building shapes are far too big. Please adjust to the satellite imagery and square the buildings by pressing the "Q" key. Thank you.
miluethi (2024-04-08 11:56:55+00:00): Hi Rafi, can you please shape buildings to the satellite imagery? I noticed some building which were far bigger than the sat imagery. Thank you for your OSM contribution. Michael
trigpoint (2024-03-09 18:41:51+00:00): Hi Greg
Diolch for your edits on Ynys Môn, however in this and your other changesets you have tagged buildings a landuse=farmyard.  This tag should only be used on the outer boundary of a farmyard.

Please could you correct this and bear in mind in the future.

Diolch Phil
geoephemera (2024-03-07 16:56:44+00:00): Checking on count of ADA parking spaces.
Cebderby (2024-03-07 17:08:22+00:00): È errato utilizzare amenity=parking per singoli posti auto all'interno di un amenity=parking esistente. Devono essere modificati in amenity=parking_space.
Inoltre, capacity:disabled non è un tag supportato.
Si prega di leggere https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking_space
Aim311_ (2024-07-08 18:47:35+00:00): Cześć. Drogę https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/127980539 z powrotem poprawiłem na track, gdyż jest ona nie przejedna dla aut osobowych i to nawet nawet przy dobrej pogodzie. Nie oznaczony numer drogi (2730P) nie jest podstawą do podnoszenia jej kategorii.
claudia10 (2024-03-08 13:57:11+00:00): Hallo Gerold, 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11701393446
amenity=Unterwaldhausen und bench=Unterwaldhausen kommt mir sonderbar vor als tagging. 
Ging hier was schief und es sollte vielleicht eher amenity=bench sein und Unterwaldhausen ist der Name oder ähnliches?
Gerold (2024-03-08 19:06:03+00:00): Oh, ja. Da war ich unaufmerksam.
Danke für den Hinweis.
Frans S (2024-03-08 12:20:06+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Check here how to map a round building
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CX4T6uOi7HE

Buildings are still not squared.

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148353947
muralito (2024-03-08 11:25:34+00:00): Hola. Gracias por los aportes.

Ten en cuenta que los telefonos tienen que tener el formato internacional (para que por ejemplo, de una app en un celular se pueda llamar sin importar de donde sea. Ver https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:phone

y el formato del opening_hours, si bien el texto que pusiste lo ve una persona y entiende, para que sea util para las apps tiene tambien que estar en un formato estandar. Ver https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:opening_hours por ejemplo para que una busqueda te muestre distinto los lugares cerrados o proximos a cerrar.
Cebderby (2024-03-07 18:42:10+00:00): Perché stai aggiungendo queste curiosità irrilevanti quando hai almeno 50 ponti fluviali con falsi tunnel=culvert sotterranei sotto di loro che hai creato e che devi riparare. Così come molte piccole aree di "building" che devi correggere in "building:part".

Inoltre, qual è la fonte di questa modifica? È necessaria una risposta onesta a questa domanda.
ivanbranco (2024-03-07 19:08:12+00:00): Presumo inoltre che website=* debba essere operator:website=*?

Mi accodo alla domanda sulle fonti, spesso aggiungi height=* e min_height=* agli elementi (come le già citate building:part), che non possono essere dedotti solo da "Bing Maps Aerial" (l'unica fonte riportata nei metadati)
pboscherini (2024-03-11 18:00:38+00:00): Due to the string "*openstreetmap*" on the top of your personal computer, the system need the string "fonti" in en_GB please.
Regards.
Piergiorgio.
Cebderby (2024-03-11 19:45:50+00:00): I ask again, what is the source of your information for details that cannot be seen on the Bing imagery?
pboscherini (2024-03-12 14:45:57+00:00): Morning 'Commento da Cebderby circa 19 ore fa',

please, read the Creative Commons web page "© Contributori di OpenStreetMap" at the url https://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright

A user role niked " Cebderby" or a user role niked " ivanbranco" cannot ASK (and "again") source data to another user.

Please, you must Elaborate (first of "ETL" process of the Creative Commons certification program) ... then then then .. you can Transform my data (we indend the data INSERT of another user).

Please, ensure the community that you have not only the "user role" grant.
If true, you must list all your roles on
the webdomain *openstreetmap*

Regards.
Piergiorgio.
Khidistavi (2024-03-07 17:55:47+00:00): "Dictionary of geographical names of Abkhazia and other states" by V.A. Chirikba was used for the update
aceman444 (2026-05-04 09:17:23+00:00): Zdravim, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/93946185 nezda sa mi, ze by taka velka budova mala byt kaplnkou.
Filip009 (2026-05-04 12:48:57+00:00): opravené
aceman444 (2026-05-04 19:14:20+00:00): Dik
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-05 02:07:02+00:00): Hello!

Note that you do not need to add description of feature type as a name.
For example when mapping tree it is enough to specify that it is a tree, no need for putting that name of this specific tree is "Tree" (or "Arbre", in French).

So for buildings it is not needed to put Bâtiment as their name.

Or do you maybe know that this specific object mapped at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1258761008 is specifically named with such name?

Do not worry too much about this issue - I made way worse mistakes when I was starting. Maybe some tool or explanation is confusing? Why you added this name? Note that I am asking as maybe something can be fixed to be less confusing.

And if it was mistake - can you edit map to remove this name?
mcliquid (2024-03-08 07:38:12+00:00): Hallo Thomas, nur ein kleiner Hinweis zur der Anwendung von "Kiesel" im englischen "pebblestone". Damit sind die abgerundeten Steine gemeint, welche am Meer / am Strand liegen und es maximal auf hübsch angelegten Vorgärtenwegen schaffen.
Bei Waldwegen wäre eher "feiner Schotter" wenn maximal 5mm groß oder "verdichtet" zu verwenden.
Viele Grüße!
Johnwhelan (2024-06-17 23:02:10+00:00): You seem to be importing over existing buildings.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-31 14:54:26+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11701513375/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop?
Baloo Uriza (2024-03-11 01:11:45+00:00): I feel like highway=path might be a stronger choice in this case; I tend to consider highway=cycleway as the paved, road style things with signs and lanes with possible sidewalks purpose built for transportation, with paths being more like what this appears to be.
shelbyfrank (2024-03-11 15:15:05+00:00): Hello! Thanks for your interest. Our data collection process involved using a high-precision Trimble handheld GPS device, ensuring accuracy in mapping. In accordance with the OpenStreetMap tagging conventions outlined in the wiki link, all distinct cycleways have been appropriately marked as 'highway=cycleway.' If you have any further questions or suggestions, feel free to share them! https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle_tags_map
VictorIE (2024-05-23 09:23:44+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1257167897

These locations are turning circles, not parking areas. :)
Tim Sweeney (2024-05-23 13:08:46+00:00): Hello, I'm not really sure what to tag these parts of the road. A turning circle can only be placed for a point, not a line as far as I can tell. Also there isn't a circle at the end of it, it looks the same as any other part of the road.

Maybe they could be marked as a normal part of the road with a turning circle at the end if it?

I'm not really sure what to do, so if you could edit one as an example it would be really appreciated :)
VictorIE (2024-05-23 17:14:49+00:00): Hi,

The way can be tagged like the rest of the highway=*

The 'junction' is tagged like this: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11687931360

If there are dead ends, they can be  tagged like this: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11687931359
eggie (2024-03-07 19:01:25+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
 De bakker is gelukt, maar je hebt 	Scharenburgstraat 7 naar een ander deel van Breda gesleept.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=148355721
MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-03-07 19:17:35+00:00): Adres hersteld
JaF24 (2024-03-07 20:00:45+00:00): Excuses, ik ga je bericht nu checken. Hartelijk bedankt.
eggie (2024-03-07 20:05:27+00:00): Hoi.. de oorzaak is dat je iets per abuis selecteert met de linkermuisknop..maar met diezelfde knop ook schuift. Een addertje dus.
Mapse..
eggie
JaF24 (2024-03-07 20:09:31+00:00): Ik snap hem. Beetje tricky inderdaad, ik zal erop letten.
Thanks!
eggie (2024-03-07 20:13:01+00:00): Bij editor Josm schuif je met de rechtermuisknop. .. maar die heeft ook z'n nukken. Die is wel de betere editor.
Frans S (2024-03-22 16:08:50+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Not accurate mapped.
many buildings clustered
Included yard into a mapping
not squared a single building.


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148355828
Udarian (2024-03-07 19:01:31+00:00): must have made a mistake when entering the commits to revert, reverting this, sorry for the commit

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148356229
Udarian (2024-03-07 19:08:18+00:00): figured out the problem, 14678376 is one number of of 146783763 which is the correct commit id, I accidentally didn't select the whole id in the commit url copied and pasted but because it wasn't the whole id it caused issues. 
again sorry for the inconvenience to those in Europa that this effects.
olo81 (2024-03-30 20:42:36+00:00): komitet wyborczy to nie partia, komitety są tymczasowe i tym bardziej nie powinno się ich dodawać