piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_8655426 (2024-06-07 11:18:22+00:00): Cyril_valさん、こんにちは。OpenStreetMap (OSM) へようこそ。
OSM は現実の世界に存在する地物をマッピングし、正確で最新の地図をつくっていくプロジェクトです。(real and current) また、OSMの地図データはゲームだけでなく、さまざまなアプリやウェブサイトなどで使用されています。

OSMに「ありえない」架空の地物を追加したり、既存のデータを実際とは異なるものに変更したりしないでください。よろしくお願いします。(事実と異なる不正な編集を行ったユーザーは、ブロックされる可能性があります。)

・「ようこそ！」
https://www.openstreetmap.org/welcome

・JA:破壊行為
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:破壊行為

・Beware of fake beaches (Pokémon Go) (偽のビーチに注意してください。ポケモン GO)
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/beware-of-fake-beaches-pokemon-go/112413

・新規マッパーに、コミュニティメンバーからお願いしたいこと
https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2018/06/12/tips-pokemon-go-2/?lang=ja

---

・JA:初心者ガイド
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:初心者ガイド

・learnOSM (ビギナーズガイド)
https://learnosm.org/ja/beginner/

・JA:Map Features (地物)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Map_Features
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152352526
user_8655426 (2024-06-07 11:29:07+00:00): Reverted. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152371529
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-09 07:29:03+00:00): Good luck with this indoor mapping.

Looks somehow "interesting" ... https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=152352936#20/48.26685/11.67016
CommanderStorm (2024-06-09 10:47:01+00:00): I know, mistakes were made, but I think more recent changes better reflect this.

The issue was mainly that I was unusure if I need to pytagorize and fully connect every exit/entry (it is an open floor plan on level 0)
Another issue was that the editor I used has apparently some rounding errors or something else going on which I need to investigate. map per gave me some tips about not having the indoor rooms and outdoor things at the same place and instead separate them by a few cm.

See 
https://openlevelup.net/?l=0#21/48.26686/11.67011 for more recent results
ianlopez1115 (2024-06-07 00:00:43+00:00): *[Santiago, Santo Tomas] add gas station details
serock (2024-06-07 17:30:24+00:00): Hola Ferviarg, tuve que hacer arreglos por los que ya habíamos hablamos en privado.

Al agregar objetos con el tag. highway=pedestrian (galerías, plazas, etc. ) y conectarlos con la calle, donde estas están con el tag. highway=residential, eso genera que se tome como vía superpuesta o duplicada, ya que se estaría pisando una “calle peatonal” con una “calle residencial”.
Por lo general los objetos no deben ser parte de la calles (vías), salvo puentes, ríos, ferrocarril.
Si tiene alguna otra duda, puede consultar los distintos canales de comunicación que tiene esta comunidad:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Argentina#Contacto

Saludos.
jbcharron (2024-06-08 21:25:04+00:00): Bonjour,
Merci pour votre contribution
Pour information du fait que le commerce soit intérieur de la relation Metz, il n'est pas nécessaire d'ajouter le tag addr:city et addr:postcode.
Bonne soirée à vous
archie (2024-06-07 05:00:09+00:00): Jag har fixat de felplaceringar som du har fört in i osm genom detta changeset. Vänligen utgå inte från att andra karterare har gjort fel vid placeringen utan justera din bildbakgrund först. Det bästa är nog att du låter bli att flytta eller radera något till dess du har en bättre förståelse av hur det här fungerar. Annars förstör du mer. 
Dock bra med alla affärer du har lagt till. Tack!
archie (2024-06-07 05:03:29+00:00): Bara en kommentar till din ändringskommentar "Uppdateringar och korrigeringar". Jag förmodar att du med "korrigeringar" menar menar lägesplaceringen av vägar m m. Vänligen låt bli att "korrigera" något till dess du vet vad du gör. Tack!
Hufkratzer (2024-06-07 12:50:57+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1290125703 is not a horse riding centre (tag leisure=horse_riding), it is a horse riding arena like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/205099762. In OSM these arenas are usually tagged leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian and iD has a different preset for them which sets these tags. Compare https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=horse_riding
Parma1983 (2024-06-07 15:20:17+00:00): Hi.
Thanks, I couldn't find the exact definition. I just corrected it
Hufkratzer (2024-06-08 08:24:20+00:00): A riding centre is the whole facility including stables, other buildings, arenas, paddocks, etc., a riding arena is just an area where horses are ridden. Example https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1146126117
Parma1983 (2024-06-08 10:46:42+00:00): Ok, thanks
NorthCrab_upload (2024-06-07 02:30:19+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11861576334

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
woodpeck_repair (2024-06-09 19:56:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152469638 where the changeset comment is: revert edits that were made contravening a DWG request in https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16114
Bienson (2024-06-08 19:57:52+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152430046 -
Dass das Gemeindebüro umgezogen ist, ändert nichts an der Zugehörigkeit der Kirche zur Gemeinde (parish=*)
Im Fokus (2024-06-10 00:57:17+00:00): Hallo Bienson, Insider-Information? Schau doch mal bitte hier: https://lydia-dortmund.ekvw.de/ 
Alle angezeigten acht Gottesdienste vom nächsten Sonntag, dem 16. Juni, bis zum Sonntag 04. August finden in der Pauluskirche statt. Schon seltsam, wenn doch die Lutherkirche noch Heimat der Lydia-Gemeinde wäre. Ich werde deshalb den Zusatz wieder entfernen und wenn Du damit nicht einverstanden sein solltest, erwarte ich nachvollziehbare Belege, dass in der Lutherkirche doch noch Lydia-Gemeindearbeit stattfindet. Gruß
Bienson (2024-06-10 08:04:01+00:00): Entweder ist die Kirche entweiht (disused:amenity=church) oder gehört offiziell weiterhin zu einer Gemeinde, die sie verwaltet.
Im Fokus (2024-06-10 10:38:55+00:00): Mag sein dass der Kirchenkreis so eine "verwaiste" Kirche verwaltet, mag sein, dass es tatsächlich noch die Lydia-Gemeinde ist, aber wer braucht die Info? Wenn mit dem Zusatz "Lydia-Gemeinde" zum Namen Lutherkirche fälschlich der Eindruck erweckt wird, es gäbe hier noch ein Gemeindeleben, dass es eben nicht mehr gibt, dann ist das nur irreführend für die OSM-Nutzer. OSM dient schließlich nicht dem Zweck, die Verwaltungsstrukturen der evangelischen Kirche abzubilden (oder einer anderen) - oder?
Bienson (2024-06-18 03:39:44+00:00): Um den Namenszusatz geht es ja auch nicht, der ist so oder so falsch.
Im Fokus (2024-06-18 11:19:26+00:00): Na dann ist es doch jetzt gut so, oder nicht? Den Gemeindenamen würde ich sowieso weglassen, denn der kann sich gerade bei den beiden großen christlischen Konfessionen in den nächsten Jahren durch notwendige Zusammenschlüsse leider noch häufig ändern. Das Patrozinium ist mit Abstand wichtigstes Merkmal und ändert sich nur äußerst selten, wird zudem selbst im Fall der Profanierung oft in den neuen Namen integriert (Bsp: Lutherturm Köln).
woodpeck_repair (2024-06-09 19:56:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152469638 where the changeset comment is: revert edits that were made contravening a DWG request in https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16114
miluethi (2024-06-07 11:32:19+00:00): Hi Aditya,

Please square out all your building shapes in OSM. Just select a building shape and press the “Q”.

Thank you for contributing to OSM Nicaragua.
Aditya P (2024-06-07 11:49:49+00:00): Hi  miluethi,

I'm unable to open this map and edit it on the abovementioned hotosm link.
Is there another way to do so?

Thanks
miluethi (2024-06-07 11:55:33+00:00): Hi Aditya,

Try to zoom in before you click “Edit” it, if the selection is to large, you can’t edit in the iD editor.

Good luck!
Aditya P (2024-06-08 14:05:37+00:00): Hi miluethi,

I've squared off the buildings as requested. Kindly let me know if there's anything else required.

Thanks
miluethi (2024-06-08 22:27:15+00:00): Perfect. Thank you!
gscholz (2024-08-23 08:46:29+00:00): Hi CiriCuervo,
this changeset has destroyed the boundary relations of "Ceramista" and "Villa Mitre":

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-59.87018&lat=-36.76466&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=152356101

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17322990/history

Especially the deletion of way 820788001 has caused this errors:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/820788001

I have just fixed this. Please be careful editing relations.
Guido
CiriCuervo (2024-08-23 22:15:15+00:00): Thanks for the fix Guido, I was not aware of the issue.
AjBelnuovo (2025-04-29 18:30:02+00:00): Qual é a fonte do traçado e nome deste rio?
Supaplex (2024-06-07 04:33:54+00:00): Hi,

You seem to connect a building and a road, that seems not right. Another problem is not to square a building which usually should be square. Can you fix your errors?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152356133
Wulf4096 (2025-04-22 11:02:18+00:00): Siehe https://osm.org/note/4721827
aceman444 (2025-03-24 00:06:50+00:00): Zdravim, poprosim trochu zmysluplnejsie popisy sad zmien:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Dobr%C3%A9_koment%C3%A1%C5%99e_sad_zm%C4%9Bn

Dakujem za posunutie autobusovych zastavok, ak teda boli prelozene na nove miesta (neuvadzate ziadny zdroj).
Skoda, ze ste neupravili spravne linky autobusov a body stop_position. Opravim to.

A ake je povolenie vjazdu na tom novom obratisku https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1290144598 ? Aka je tam dopravna znacka? Lebo ste tam dali motor_vehicle=designated, co znamena, ze je cesta urcena pre motorove vozidla. To je akosi standard, cize takato znacka nema velmi zmysel. Zrejme ste chceli vyjadrit nejaky zakaz. Aky?
LUKy_BB (2025-03-24 06:19:42+00:00): Zastávky boli preložené do nového obratiska, do ktorého má povolený vjazd len MHD (zdroj=opakovaný osobný prejazd miestom 🤪). Ak som to nenahodil správne, tak ďakujem za opravu 👌
aceman444 (2025-03-24 18:27:47+00:00): Dakujem, dam tam teda povolenie len pre bus.
Warin61 (2024-06-09 01:03:07+00:00): Welcome to OSM!

The relation of the Barr Smith reading room is wrong; multipolygon outer ways cannot share segments... I take it the two member ways have different levels??? Tag each way as builing part with the correct levels .. and then...

The Way: Barr Smith Library (678979212) looks to be the 'reading room' ... and would be best tagged with amenity=library.. and 'reading room'???
Warin61 (2024-06-16 01:06:57+00:00): Ok,
I have attempted to detail this library... 

The building base is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1292752686 - this carries the tags for the library. It should have the highest level tagged on it.. I think arr yes .. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:part

I think I have it right, please check it!
Other than the base library way above the 2 other ways are ;
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/205303849
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/159946355
fortera_au (2024-06-09 01:02:35+00:00): If it's private it should be access=private, not acecss=no.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152357076
IpswichEdits (2024-06-07 08:48:00+00:00): Thanks for spotting and fixing this. It was my error yesterday.
tastrax (2024-06-08 11:23:31+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, +61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM. – Cheers

PS - I cleaned up the Links building to better represent what is on the ground. If a jobs worth doing, its worth doing well.
Merlin13245 (2024-06-07 14:23:22+00:00): Hello, and welcome to open street maps!

I've made some minor adjustments to your addition, mainly shifting the node and converting it to an area to represent the exact location of your business on the map. I've also changed the formatting of your open hours to match the standard for the map.

You can see my changes here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152379105

Thanks for contributing to the map!
mcliquid (2024-06-25 09:28:58+00:00): Danke! Das war mein Fehler damals.
Warin61 (2024-06-09 01:36:37+00:00): Car parking down not extend to the pedestrian crossings... 

I have detailed the car parking in this area.
osmviborg (2024-06-07 07:20:09+00:00): At du ikke er i stand til at afgøre hvad vej vandet løber i røret under vejen, betyder ikke, at røret ikke er der. At fjerne forbindelse er forkert.
osmviborg (2024-06-07 07:25:02+00:00): Glem det, forbindelsen var doubleret.
owiecc (2024-06-07 07:26:51+00:00): And the pipe it is still there, I just removed the overlapping bit. It was just drawn in a loop with start and end node overlapping. I assume this was done so that the linter does not complain that about this situation ←·→.

 The water direction is still unclear in the whole segment.
osmviborg (2024-06-07 07:37:08+00:00): I checked the contour lines, direction is OK.
owiecc (2024-06-07 08:00:39+00:00): That is a good idea. Did not think about that.
b-holdet (2024-06-07 16:34:52+00:00): Terrænet skråner nedad fra underløbet og mod NNV til Nørre Å.
Mod ØSØ er området fladt i ca. 200-300 meter og herefter skråner det nedad mod Gudenå.
Jeg tror at man har forbundet vandløbet under vejen for at få vandet ud af området til begge sider.

Se evt 0,5 meter højdekurverne i området for detaljer.
VladaC (2024-06-26 13:18:41+00:00): Viz https://openstreetmap.cz/talkcz/c3831#mdd70a6
felipeeugenio (2024-06-07 13:00:49+00:00): Hola. Buenas ediciones


si además las vías son privadas, usar access=private por favor. Así evitamos ruteos de público general por el camino.
gracias
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152360643
Filip009 (2024-06-07 20:50:07+00:00): Zdravím, otváracie hodiny je nutné udávať v správnom formáte. Predtým bol formát správny. Keď ste chcel len odobrať sobotu, stačilo zmeniť "Sa" za "Fr". Slovenské názvy nepochopí žiadny zobrazovač týchto údajov.
woodpeck_repair (2024-06-09 19:56:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152469638 where the changeset comment is: revert edits that were made contravening a DWG request in https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16114
Piotr Strębski (2024-06-27 20:51:02+00:00): Hej, czy ten łacznik na pewno istnieje w rzeczywstości? Kiedy został zbudowany? Pozdrowienia!
dawidg81 (2024-08-19 19:01:45+00:00): https://www.osielsko.pl/sites/default/files/PS_Grabowa_Ark.%203.0_06.07.2018-1.pdf
nevw (2024-06-07 08:04:01+00:00): Street names should not be abbreviated in osm
VictorIE (2024-06-12 02:58:49+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11962253634

Note that pedestrians, etc. can still use streets like these as through routes, so be sure to maintain at least a footway connecting the two halves of the street.
Michael SI (2024-06-12 20:49:38+00:00): Hi
Thankyou for еру comment. I'll keep it in mind.
HellMap (2024-06-26 09:34:53+00:00): Izmaiņa atcelta, jo atkal izdzēsts ceļš bez paskaidrojuma, kuram bija jāpielabo vērtības nevis jādzēš.
mcliquid (2024-06-20 11:04:12+00:00): Hallo und vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag,

bitte beachte jedoch: Changesets sollten lokal sein.

In deinem Fall bitte vor dem Ortswechsel immer alle Änderungen in StreetComplete hochladen!

Um Konflikte zu vermeiden und aus Höflichkeit gegenüber anderen wird empfohlen:
• Änderungen in einem kleinen geografischen Bereich zu kombinieren (innerhalb einer Stadt, eines Bezirks oder einer Provinz)
• Änderungen innerhalb desselben Landes zu halten
• Änderungen hochzuladen/speichern, bevor man in einem anderen Gebiet weiterkartiert

Warum? Schau dir den Abschnitt "Geographische Größe von Changesets" auf dieser Wiki-Seite an:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Danke für die Berücksichtigung, einen schönen Tag noch und fröhliches Mappen!
mcliquid (2024-06-25 11:25:35+00:00): Hi, wieso ergänzt du einen Link der eine permanente Weiterleitung ist? Wäre es nicht besser, den neuen Link zu ergänzen? Oder was würde dagegen sprechen?
PPete2 (2024-06-25 11:39:54+00:00): Hi, falls du http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=16094 meinst: Das ist der Link der Diskussion der damals vom Ersteller der Gebirgsgruppen der Ostalpen getaggt wurde. Bei ein paar Gruppen wurde dieser - vermutlich versehentlich - im Laufe der Zeit beschädigt, bei diesen habe ich ihn wieder hergestellt.

Wenn du die Links sämtlicher AV-Gebirgsgruppen der Ostalpen auf die aktuelle Forum-URL aktualisieren möchtest, spricht meiner Meinung nach nichts dagegegen.
adiatmad (2024-07-18 04:11:22+00:00): Hi, RinchenNorbu! Would you mind explaining why layer=-1 was included in the highway? Appreciate it!

(https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1290186545)
(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer)
MxxCon (2024-06-17 16:34:01+00:00): In my opinion tiger:* tags shouldn't be added or updated at all. They are leftovers of a decade old streets import and are not used for anything else. If anything, they should be deleted...
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152363932
mueschel (2024-06-17 17:26:45+00:00): Hi,
the tags were added in another changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152313131
hwierzbicki (2024-07-14 00:12:52+00:00): Hi,

I've noticed you've been adding some communications masts! 

Please take note that the tag "man_made=communications_tower" should rarely be used. Instead, please use the combo "man_made=mast" + 
"tower:type=communication". 

Thanks, and feel free to check the documentation for more info!
martien-176 (2024-06-07 15:01:50+00:00): Hi,  thanks for mapping. You requested a review of your mappings. 

Your buildings are well mapped. Good location, square corners and precise outline. 

Thanks and regards, Martien, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152364648
BCNorwich (2024-06-07 11:29:23+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The definitive map, (https://www.suffolk.gov.uk/asset-library/imported/Crowfield.pdf), shows that the footpath you've removed is a public right of way. 

The definitive map and statement are legal documents and do not show that this path has been extinguished. It can only be removed by a Definitive Map Modification Order, DMMO after the due process of application. Are you sure it's been extinguished? Or has the land owner merely decided not to recognize its existence? 

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2024-06-13 11:04:38+00:00): No response so I've reverted the change.
rab (2024-06-11 20:45:58+00:00): Hello Cole Myers,
I think this will look similar to all other urban settlements in Zimbabwe. Where roads always run parallel to the buildings. It usually looks a bit chaotic during the construction phase, as in this case, and it's only a temporary snapshot what we can see in this certainly not really recent footage. That's why I use highway =construction until the area is fully built up. With this tagging it is also easy to find the roads again and to update them with each new background layer version
Cole Myers (2024-06-13 07:25:32+00:00): Hi Ralf, This mapping was done under HOT OSM project #16836 and the task instructions ask for pre-existing mapping to be corrected and aligned with current imagery. I am not the only one working on the project so it is likely that lots of other highway=construction mapping will get altered. While I understand about pre-mapping intended road infrastructure, in Zim the outcome does not always follow the plan, and I question whether it is right to not map what is actually on the ground.  Some of your mapping here is 6 years old and yet the roads are still not in existence. I think perhaps you should take this up with the HOT project managers? I will in any event refrain from working this area until the matter is resolved. https://tasks.hotosm.org/projects/16836/tasks?page=1
rab (2024-06-13 17:18:54+00:00): Hi Cole,
the project manager seems to read my comments but is not responsive to my messages so far. Are you in contact with the managers?

https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussions

For reference only:
https://livingatlas.arcgis.com/wayback/?active=1052&ext=28.94149,-14.81597,28.97518,-14.79475#active=7110&mapCenter=30.16746%2C-17.39656%2C17
Cole Myers (2024-06-14 06:32:54+00:00): Hi Ralf, where did you comment other than here? The HOT project manager in this case is this chap https://tasks.hotosm.org/users/surveyor_jr. Project managers can be contacted via the HOT tasking manager under the specific project (https://tasks.hotosm.org/projects/16836#questionsAndComments). There is also a Slack channel for HOT OSM which will get the attention of the higher ups and maybe get better results. I sometimes find that these HOT projects get put out by relatively inexperienced OSM mappers as some sort of study project but then they seem to do little to supervise what happens afterwards
rab (2024-06-14 21:33:07+00:00): Hi Cole, 
the HOT tasking manager is blocked for me due to some previous conflicts with HOT
aceman444 (2024-07-04 19:36:51+00:00): How do you know from ESRI imagery the building is called Studia RTVS (even with a typo)? And what does building name have to do with "road tags" ?

Also it seems adding parking_aisle to roads like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27741254 is not particularly correct. The are no official parking even though cars seem to park there for a while. The roads seem to be driveways to the zoo entrance, or without any 'service' tag at all.
Supaplex (2024-06-07 10:24:01+00:00): Hi,

It seems you are adding buildings that are bigger than the actual buildings. Can you look carefully at the satellite image, and fix the oversized buildings?
If you are not familiar with what buildings look like in Taiwan, please have a look at those mapped detail areas. And I think around Hualien there are buildings already traced very well. And don't connect the building outline to roads or boarders
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152365526
silversurfer83 (2024-06-07 11:29:01+00:00): Moinsen :)

der "Name" ist an diesem Gebäude schon als "building:ref=M2" erfasst. Hier wäre schön eine Doppelung zu vermeiden und die Gebäude dieses Ensembles einheitlich zu erfassen. Entweder über die "ref" oder den "name".

cheers
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152365809
Leitstelle Kassel 5 (2024-06-07 11:42:52+00:00): Moin,
die Gebäude auf diesem Gebiet haben aber alle den Namen und building:ref so versorgt.
?
silversurfer83 (2024-06-07 11:49:48+00:00): Ah...
Ok.
Dann erstmal so machen. Muss mir das mal näher ansehen :)
user_12500175 (2024-06-18 08:59:09+00:00): Hallo,
klasse dass du bei OSM mitmacht und hilfst die Daten zu verbessern :-)

Ein Hinweis, wenn du einen Hinweisnode bearbeitet hast bitte setze denn Node auf erledigt. Er wird dann grün und verschwindet nach einer Woche aus der Karte.

Frohes Mappen
Gruß
Danfost
Warin61 (2024-06-08 03:03:49+00:00): Still broken.
21 The Entrance North to Gosford, Way members unordered or missing
XD346 (2024-07-28 17:53:21+00:00): Please note 深圳地铁前海车辆段 is a subway depot building above ground, so please DO NOT remove the building label. :)
I will fix it for this time.