piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
RedGreenBlue09 (2024-06-23 06:43:30+00:00): @phoenix Tôi thấy người giỗi là anh đấy, chỉ trích chúng tôi hết cái này đến cái kia. Bây giờ tranh luận trên mạng anh ko chịu, anh cũng không phục ý kiến của chúng tôi (bảo là đầy lỗ hổng) thì thôi riêng tôi để anh  class cả cái TP này, tôi không xỉa gì vào nữa. Tất nhiên tôi không vui với cái kiểu class không giống ai của anh.
phoenixsaigon1698 (2024-06-23 11:00:46+00:00): Anh à, trước khi thống nhất được là đoạn Trần Phú từ NTP đến Nguyễn Trãi là class gì, Trần Phú từ Nguyễn Trãi đến An Dương Vương là class gì thì anh Tommy ảnh cũng vô sửa luôn thành tertiary, rồi tôi sửa lại. Nếu thật sự mà lắng nghe ý kiến của nhau á thì khoan sửa gì changeset của tôi đi rồi tính tiếp. Cái đoạn đầy lỗ hổng là tôi nói từ rất trên rồi. Cuối cùng thì chọn cái nào, nhiều xe, ít xe của anh; quy hoạch xưa của Tommy; nhiều xe buýt, hoặc là tuyến dài nhưng nối 2 đầu thành phố, định nghĩa osm wiki như tính liên tục thẳng từ quận này qua quận kia như tôi đề xuất.
phoenixsaigon1698 (2024-06-23 11:02:04+00:00): Anh muốn nghỉ edit Saigon thì cũng được thôi, tôi cũng đâu có làm gì được anh.
phoenixsaigon1698 (2024-06-23 11:03:56+00:00): Còn cái chữ thẳng nha, xét về mặt hình học trên từng đoạn đường nối với nhau thông qua node thằng nào tạo thành nhiều góc 180 nhất thì thằng đó là thẳng nhất.
RedGreenBlue09 (2024-06-23 11:44:22+00:00): Hiện giờ tôi thấy phương án của anh Long là khả thi nhất. Về cơ bản đoạn này chỉ có 1 tuyến chạy qua nên có thể ước lượng là ít xe.
Bản thân tôi không nghĩ việc đường to hay thẳng quan trọng đến vậy (vì như tôi đã nói ở trên), hay ngày xưa nó ntn vì ngày xưa ko có 1 đoạn đường Đinh Tiên Hoàng mà giờ đông kẹt xe rần rần đấy thôi. Bây giờ tôi sẽ nêu ý kiến, anh tạo changeset gì thì tùy anh.
Về đường Trần Phú, theo tôi là tertiary, hoặc secondary cũng chấp nhận được.
RedGreenBlue09 (2024-06-23 11:48:52+00:00): Nếu thảo luận được với cộng đồng thì có thể lấy cách làm được nhiều người đồng ý nhất làm tiêu chuẩn.
Tommybara (2024-06-23 18:33:23+00:00): Sao cứ lại đưa cái tiêu chí "thẳng" vào làm gì vậy trời? Thẳng trong trường hợp này có nghĩa lý gì, khi mà đoạn Trần Phú này đã bị đoạn 1 chiều từ ADV đến ngã sáu Cộng Hòa chặn chiều ngược lại.

Ở trên chẳng phải tui đã giải thích rõ rồi hay sao? Nếu đoạn Trần Phú từ ngã sáu cũng 2 chiều nốt thì OK, sẽ đồng ý là đoạn này cũng là primary (giống Ngô Gia Tự).

Cơ sở này tui cũng đã áp dụng khi hạ cấp đoạn NTMK từ CMT8 đến Đinh Tiên Hoàng ấy. Nhưng mà đoạn MK này vì xét tới các yếu tố khác như số tuyến bus đông, cũng như trong lịch sử xưa xửa xừa xưa nó là con đường chạy xuyên Thành Gia Định nên chấp nhận là primary.
Tommybara (2024-06-23 18:37:03+00:00): Mà coi bộ bạn @phoenix đây ngộ ghê luôn. Tui nói rõ là căn cứ quy hoạch TỪ XƯA TỚI NAY, mà bạn có vẻ thích đi rút ruột chữ của tui để cho nó còn "quy hoạch xưa", rồi là "old maps".

Cứ lên mạng mà gõ quy hoạch giao thông TPHCM ấy, rồi coi trong bản đồ đó người ta phân loại đoạn Trần Phú này kiểu gì.
simonschaufi (2024-06-24 15:08:34+00:00): @ratrun, what exactly did you change here? Unfortunately OSM doesn't really show the changes here in the history. At least the line is not showing up anymore.
ratrun (2024-06-24 16:31:55+00:00): Hi,
I fixed a routing error by merging the separate unconnected end points of your new ferry line to node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/83560399#map=19/37.90583/20.70649 such that it got connected to the pier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/77669809#map=19/37.90522/20.70794. I cannot provide more details because user CharliePlett edited the ferry route again just a few minutes ago. As I don't know which way you meant by "the line" I cannot reproduce what your note that it does not show up. I can only say that I do see the ferry route in JOSM and also on lower zoom levels of the carto rendering.
simonschaufi (2024-06-24 18:11:11+00:00): Yes, I got some help because the rendered line wasn't rendered anymore with your change. CharliePlett has fixed that again.
Geo-Tobi (2026-01-01 08:55:31+00:00): Es wurde Access=destination gesetzt UND vehicle=destination. Das kann nicht sein. Bitte um Korrektur.
literan (2024-06-23 12:16:13+00:00): может, все же, можно квалифицировать как service для экстренного проезда?
Ayash Ranjan Mohanty (2024-06-22 07:01:05+00:00): Ramachandrapur, Delangakothabar, India
NeisBot (2024-06-22 07:16:24+00:00): Hi catgirlseraid, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1294903677

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-22 07:23:21+00:00): Thank you for your mapped beach.
Looks good!

#HappyMapping
InsertUser (2024-06-23 17:30:12+00:00): ... and California and West Virginia. 

Please save in betweeen widely spaced edits.
❤️‍🔥 (2024-06-22 10:19:00+00:00): Hi, you requested a review of this edit: The way you mapped the kerbs/sidewalks/crossings is perfect and really nicely done. 

However, it would be very helpful if you could use a meaningful comment when you upload your changes. This saves a lot of time for reviewers, and helps everyone to understand what you're trying to do.

There's some more info on this page: https://osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Ashim Paudel (2024-06-22 07:44:51+00:00): Hey km2bp
Good works! Just remember not to join two buildings together
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153017978
user_1150944 (2024-06-22 09:13:16+00:00): Die Höhenbeschränkung an der Brücke macht schon Sinn, zumal der Weg auf der rechten Flussseite unter der Brücke für meine Begriffe beschränkt ist, zwar nicht durch ein Schild, aber durch die Realität. Wie das auf der linken Flusseite unter der Brücke tatsäclich aussieht, muss ich mir gelegentlich ansehen, allerdings sind die Brückenumfahrungen sicher nicht ohne Grund angelegt.
söm4324 (2024-06-22 15:57:24+00:00): Sehe ich im Grunde auch so. Ich habe das maxheight:signed=no daher nur bei den Wegen entfernt, die nicht unter der Brücke durchführen und somit auch keine Höhenbeschränkung haben.

Die beiden Wegteile unter der Brücke (nördliche Seite: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1294745326, südliche Seite: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1294745323) sind so geblieben, wie sie waren.
Madi-Red (2024-07-29 11:25:11+00:00): Hello CloCkWeRX
Thank you for mapping!
I restored a deleted way 1298939900 and aligned it according to Rio Mosaic 2022.
Please inspect your task carefully before closing.
Happy Mapping!
emersonveenstra (2024-06-28 15:18:46+00:00): Are you really sure that's the name of the store? Or did you copy it from a source you probably aren't allowed to use?
lakedistrict (2024-06-22 16:23:10+00:00): 🏃‍♂️
Nakaner (2024-12-11 22:36:39+00:00): Hallo,

ist es Absicht, dass du die Bahnsteigkanten noch zusätzlich mit highway=footway getaggt hast?

Viele Grüße

Michael
user_17222985 (2024-06-22 09:21:58+00:00): очисні споруди 
виправлено межі села / додано пропущене /
SammysHP (2024-06-28 17:30:25+00:00): Hallo Harald,
 
dir scheint der Kleingärtnerverein sehr am Herzen zu liegen. Damit die Anlage auch anständig in OpenStreetMap vertreten ist, müssen gewisse Vorgaben eingehalten werden.
 
Bei den Parzellen handelt es sich ganz offensichtlich nicht um öffentliche Parkanlagen, weshalb dein geändertes Tagging falsch ist. Auch heißt die Anlage nicht in der Gesamtheit "Bob's Garten".
 
Nach Prüfung aller deiner Änderungen bin ich zu dem Schluss gekommen, dass sämtliche Änderungssätze rückgängig zu machen sind, mit Ausnahme der Ergänzungen zum Helmut Hörstmann Weg. Ich bitte dich, keine weiteren Änderungen an diesem Bereich durchzuführen, um das Umkehren nicht zu erschweren. Soweit keine Einwände kommen, würde ich dies am kommenden Sonntag erledigen.
 
Wenn du uns deine Ziele beschreibst, finden wir sicher einen Weg, die Änderungen auf ordentliche Weise umzusetzen.
 
Viele Grüße, Sven
H a r a l d 1948 (2024-06-29 11:11:02+00:00): Bob's Garten ist tatsächlich die Bezeichnung für einen Lagerplatz, der in Nummer 226 angelegt ist.
Das wäre auf jeden Fall zu ändern.
Sonst bin ich nicht Deiner Meinung. Eine Kleingartenanlage ist per Definition eine öffentliche (frei zugängliche)Grünfläche und so auch im Bebauungsplang bezeichnet. Leider habe außer Park keine adäquate Bezeichnung gefunden. Die Gartennummer halte ich für sehr wichtig. Sie sind ja auch hinterlegt.
Viele Grüße, Harald
SammysHP (2024-06-29 11:19:34+00:00): "Bob's Garten" werde ich dann dementsprechend eintragen. Die Anlage war bereits als "Kleingarten" eingetragen. Park ist hier definitiv falsch. Die Parzellennummern hatte ich vor vielen Jahren schonmal erfasst. Falls dort Fehler sind, wäre deine Hilfe natürlich willkommen.
 
Wie die Daten letztendlich auf den Karten angezeigt werden, können wir nicht steuern. Das entscheidet jeder Kartenerzeuger selbst. Wichtig ist nur, dass die Daten korrekt in der Datenbank erfasst werden.
 
Dann werde ich mich morgen mal ransetzen und die Änderungen soweit notwendig zurücksetzen und ergänzen.
H a r a l d 1948 (2024-06-29 14:28:05+00:00): Einverstanden.
Mit wem sollte man sich vorher abstimmen? Die Änderungen sind mitunter doch recht umfangreich.
Das könnte überflüssige Arbeit vermeiden.
SammysHP (2024-06-29 14:50:05+00:00): Als Gemeinschaftsprojekt mit vielen tausenden Freiwilligen gibt es (fast) keine zentrale Autorität. Die Regeln, wie etwas einzutragen ist, wurden gemeinsam beschlossen und im [OpenStreetMap-Wiki](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/) dokumentiert.
 
Bei konkreten Fragen bietet es sich an, ein Thema im [OpenStreetMap-Forum](https://community.openstreetmap.org/) zu eröffnen. Wenn dann geklärt ist, wie etwas einzutragen ist, fängt man einfach an.
 
Was genau möchtest du denn hier ändern? Was sind deine Ziele?
SammysHP (2024-06-29 15:19:13+00:00): Es vereinfacht die Sache übrigens, wenn zusammengehörige Änderungen in einem gemeinsamen Änderungssatz hochgeladen werden.
SammysHP (2024-06-29 15:36:38+00:00): Revertiert in CS:153337358.

"Bobs Garten" habe ich entsprechend eingefügt.
Leo Slager (2024-06-22 11:09:42+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Leo Slager (2024-06-22 11:20:08+00:00): Feedback:
leisure=hackerspace verschijnt helaas niet op de kaart.
Ik heb Office=foundation weer toegevoegd, zodat de naam ook weer op de kaart verschijnt.
Tevens de oude locatie verwijderd.

Veel plezier met jullie activiteieten.
gscholz (2024-06-23 07:24:22+00:00): Hi Ozdemirtahaa,
thsi changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=29.85679&lat=40.78617&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=153022208

As you may know, this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps.
Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2024-06-28 06:32:28+00:00): Hi Ozdemirtahaa, 
this error still exits, can I get your feedback here?
Guido
gscholz (2024-07-01 07:33:01+00:00): Hi Ozdemirtahaa, 
due to your missing response, I have reverted this changeset to fix those issues.
Guido
Wouter van Dijke (2024-06-22 09:49:46+00:00): Dit is een gedeelde huisartsenpraktijk met met twee huisartsen. Zouden deze beide als 'operator' moeten worden aangegeven?
Leo Slager (2024-06-22 10:49:19+00:00): feedback:
Beide huisartsen vormen waarschijnlijk een maatschap die de feitelijke eigenaar/operator is van de praktijk.
De namen van de huisartsen opnemen als operator is dan onjuist.
tg4567 (2024-06-23 19:17:33+00:00): Hocam uydu haritasına uymayan yerler var.  Nereye bakarak çizdin buraları?
burakonder (2025-03-24 20:19:10+00:00): Bu bölgede yaşıyorum yol bitmiş olmasına rağmen uydu görüntüsüne yansımamış alanlarında çizimi yaptım.
Đuro Jiří (2024-06-23 10:59:37+00:00): Ciao Maxitaud,
pannello informativo non ha codice postale.
Corretto
Leo Slager (2024-06-22 11:21:46+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
jpennycook (2024-06-23 18:49:01+00:00): Hi!

On https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1294934072 you've set motor_vehicle=designated and bicycle=designated, but you added a note which included "stall holders, stage builders; & by and for park maintenance workers vans & trucks.".  Did you mean "private" (i.e. only open to certain people) rather than "designated" (a signposted through route for everyone using that mode of transport)?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access#List_of_possible_values

Jon
FJili (2024-07-04 10:38:55+00:00): The edit make forest impact and disappeared from rendering. I fixed it already.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-02 11:21:21+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12000446853/history has fixme:type = gate that was added in this edit
Would it be barrier=gate ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dgate )
Something else?
RCRalph (2024-06-22 17:33:26+00:00): Cześć, nie usunąłeś przypadkiem zieleni między Osiedlem Za Fortem a Klinami?
Murrumbidgee (2024-07-29 11:27:05+00:00): Hello Atampuri Godfred Assibi
Thank you for mapping!
Here you missed to add the tag. I have added building=yes tag to the building polygon way 1288637411.
Please inspect your task carefully before closing.
Happy Mapping!
Rémi_ (2024-06-22 11:10:37+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue sur OSM !
garaolaza (2024-07-01 14:16:31+00:00): Kaixo Oier!

Eskerrik asko Euskaltzaindiako toponimoak kargatzeagatik!

Kasu batzuetan akats batzuk ikusi ditut eta aditzera eman nahi nizun.

Adibidez, "Peungo zuloa", AUZO moduan etiketatu duzu, eta ez da batere egokia, edo Algorriko muturra askoz mendebalderago (2-3 kilometro) jarri duzu.

Nahi baduzu, ni zuzentzen laguntzeko prest, baina ez dakit zeintzuk zuzendu behar ditudan. Errebisatu dezakezu zure edizioa?  Eskerrik asko!!!
Oier_ (2024-07-01 18:18:11+00:00): Kaixo Gari,

Mila esker ohar hau bidaltzearren, Peungo zuloa eta Algorriko muturra, etiketatzean eskua joango zitzaidan. Euskaltzaindiak ateratako pdf batetik bisualki joan behar izan nintzen puntuak sartzen ta badirudi hanka sartze batzuk egin ditudala. Errenbisatuko ditut puntuak eta saiatuko naiz depuratzen.

Mila esker benetan!
garaolaza (2024-07-02 14:14:41+00:00): Kaixo Oier,

Ados, zure esku zuzentzea. Adibidez hauek denek place=hamlet daukate eta ez du zentzurik, hamlet-ek "herrixka" esan nahi duelako.

https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1NE7

Kasu bakoitzean tokatuko da zerbait zehatzagoa (lurmuturra, badia, hondartza eta abar.) beraz horiek ere errepasatzea eskertuko nizuke. Eskerrik asko!
Oier_ (2024-07-03 22:55:58+00:00): Kaixo berriz ere, bai arrazoi duzu. Edizioa findu beharrean dagoela zalantzarik ez. Datozen egunetan joango naiz puntuak errepasatzen eta dagokien izendapen egokia ezartzen. Mila esker!
Murrumbidgee (2024-07-29 11:26:25+00:00): Hello Atampuri Godfred Assibi
Thank you for mapping!
Here you missed to add the tag. I have added building=yes tag to the building polygon way 1288637411.
Please inspect your task carefully before closing.
Happy Mapping!
ice_fly (2024-06-22 15:40:06+00:00): data source?
user_21425661 (2024-06-22 22:25:25+00:00): Circle K website
ice_fly (2024-06-24 05:15:02+00:00): https://www.circlek.com/list-united-states-stores
ice_fly (2024-06-24 05:15:51+00:00): Edits are missing alaska
Oskarst_ (2024-08-27 11:36:37+00:00): Hi, 
Although these paths leading up to Sandviksfjellet are steep, they do not fit the wiki for sac_scale  demanding_alpine_hiking as this requires good mountaineering experience, and knowledge of elementary rope and ice axe techniques. It's understandably harder to go down than up on these paths (which I suspect you might have done), but I think demanding_mountain_hiking is more suitable. Strava heatmap also shows significant usage of these paths.

I also think they should be tagged as paths rather than footway as they are trails on the side of a mountain rather than walkways in a residential area.
Oskarst_ (2025-04-11 14:19:57+00:00): Hi,

Just went out and did the trails in question after a drizzly day here in Bergen. The leaves from last fall are still on the ground, and spring has barely sprung. I hiked up way 1148178587 (currently tagged as demanding alpine hiking), and ran down lower part of 1091940537 (currently tagged as demanding mountain hiking) and way 1194667660 (currently tagged as alpine hiking) so that they were fresh in my mind.

I appreciate the effort you've made to educate yourself on sac_scales, as classifying trails is prone to subjectivity. I acknowledge your experience on the side of Sandviksfjellet, and that your perception of the trails is a valid as anyone else's. It seems like you were in quite a bit of trouble as you spent hours navigating down these trails instead of retreating upwards which I can imagine must've been subpar to say the least.

You state that the trails are "completely invisible", which I found surprising. Did you perhaps accidentally go off route completely? I actually filmed parts of the descents and ascent on the trails in questions because, at least to me, they're clearly visible. I'll admit that sections on rocks can be tricky to see, but I'd argue that it's clear to see where the moss on the rocks has been worn down by people and that you can see the trail pick up on the other side of the rock field. I've also done the trails in the snow, and sometimes find them even more visible then.

At no point does the trails require "full-body-strength crab-scrambling", so I again question if perhaps you were off trail. I don't believe the paths in question fit the description for such a classification. Both alpine and demanding alpine hiking is described in the wiki as being exposed, and that the use of hands and easy climbing is needed. I did the trails without the use of hands what so ever, and believe that T3 demanding mountain hiking where "use of hands for balance" is a more fitting description. T3 can also have portions of the trail exposed with the danger of falling, and it is in my opinion a big difference in danger of falling and exposed terrain. We're also very from needing knowledge of elementary rope, crampons and ice axe techinques. I don't agree that the pictures in the wiki is comparable, as they show a significant exposure and the need for light scrambling. It does however sound like you did experience this on your way down (which admittedly is harder than going uphill), so I understand that you because of this would advocate for a T4 or T5 classification. I would however consider max T3 for these trails. I would like if the Norwegian SOM community weighted in on this matter.
mavl (2024-06-22 11:38:30+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 151578206, 151581309, 151581499, 151627996, 151657243, 151675051, 151723623, 151754894, 151768337, 151878615, 151879028, 151880361, 151881048, 151883271, 151927848, 151936917, 151940910, 151988414, 152227772, 152279475, 152285448, 152316380, 152326898, 152357423, 152367691, 152372705, 152480017, 152497475, 152541073, 152574432, 152626488, 152630453, 152661701, 152789750, 152789753, 152802420, 152881279.
mavl (2024-06-22 11:38:29+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 151578206, 151581309, 151581499, 151627996, 151657243, 151675051, 151723623, 151754894, 151768337, 151878615, 151879028, 151880361, 151881048, 151883271, 151927848, 151936917, 151940910, 151988414, 152227772, 152279475, 152285448, 152316380, 152326898, 152357423, 152367691, 152372705, 152480017, 152497475, 152541073, 152574432, 152626488, 152630453, 152661701, 152789750, 152789753, 152802420, 152881279.
mavl (2024-06-22 11:38:31+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 151578206, 151581309, 151581499, 151627996, 151657243, 151675051, 151723623, 151754894, 151768337, 151878615, 151879028, 151880361, 151881048, 151883271, 151927848, 151936917, 151940910, 151988414, 152227772, 152279475, 152285448, 152316380, 152326898, 152357423, 152367691, 152372705, 152480017, 152497475, 152541073, 152574432, 152626488, 152630453, 152661701, 152789750, 152789753, 152802420, 152881279.
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-22 12:20:47+00:00): Hi Spassk-dalnij, welcome to OSM and thanks for your contributions!

I noticed something interesting in your recent edits, specifically with the name at this location:
https://osm.org/node/4803191855
sen_takeya (2024-07-25 08:06:20+00:00): Hello,Engineer0088397.
Is there an Alaska Plumbing service company and apple tree real here?

Ex)You added info:
https://www.drainmastersak.com/sewers-drains/frozen-pipes/
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/927100186#map=19/38.21317/140.77645
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1294950008
sen_takeya (2024-08-19 06:42:41+00:00): Removed
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155444123
tomhukins (2024-07-17 16:36:42+00:00): Thank you for adding things to OpenStreetMap.  Your changeset comment suggests this is a pillbox, in which case https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bunker_type%3Dpillbox might be more suitable than tagging this as a castle fortress.  What do you think?
tomhukins (2024-08-06 17:37:34+00:00): I have amended this in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154903189 - I hope I used suitable tags.
literan (2024-06-23 12:05:25+00:00): тег addr:city - для указания названия населенного пункта (в России он не нужен, излишен). Но если уж вы его ставите, то ставьте правильно (только название населенного пункта, без слов "деревня", "село", "город" и т.п.)

Также не используйте его для всего подряд, например, для указания коттеджных поселков или СНТ
Intrigued (2024-06-22 12:37:28+00:00): After checking, I can confirm that everything is mapped correctly. Thank you for your edit!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153027171
Intrigued (2024-06-22 12:36:15+00:00): Thank you for your edit! As a note, place names should not be capitalised and just be in normal sentence case.

Everything else looks fine, thank you!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153027182
Intrigued (2024-06-22 12:32:31+00:00): Thank you for your contribution. I note that some of the buildings you have added are not fully squared (orthogonalised).

As you are using JOSM, when drawing a new building, please press the Q key to square a building. Alternatively, you may download the BuildingTools plugin which automatically generates squared buildings.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask.

--
Intrigued
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153027235
NorthCrab_upload (2024-06-22 12:50:25+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8635731428
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/532697946

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
dopfen (2024-07-18 21:52:13+00:00): Moin, kurze Frage: Woran wurde das "cycleway:left=track" am way "Am Vondermanns-Park (79487582)" festgestellt, das hier im dem Changeset gesetzt wurde? Oder kann das eventuell ebenfalls auf "no"?

Gruß Dopfen
Zweila (2024-07-22 10:00:48+00:00): Hallo Dopfen,

ich war vor Ort. Was bedeutet cycleway:left=track?
Ich trage alles in der App  Open Street Map ein.



Gruß
Zweila