piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
dikkeknodel (2025-05-28 14:26:09+00:00): Hoi aaa,
Via OSM Inspector ontdekte ik dat je het concept multipolygon relatie niet helemaal goed toegepast had op [1]. Je had alle items in de relatie de rol outer gegeven, terwijl het watertje de rol inner moest hebben om juist een stuk 'uit' het grasveld te snijden. Daarnaast was het overlapte het water met 2 losse stukken gras, dat kan ook niet met de outer/inner rollen volgens mij. Zie ook [2].
Daarom heb ik de twee stukken gras aan elkaar geregen en het water de inner rol gegeven. Zie ook changeset [3].
Groetjes,
Raymond
[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19136938#map=17/51.896964/5.912736&layers=N
[2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Relation:multipolygon&uselang=en-GB
[3] https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166878316
somehundred (2025-05-25 14:10:52+00:00): Nav vēl nekas vaļā. Visa tuneļa ieeja ir iežogota, ieeja otrā pusē vispār atrodas būvdarbu teritorijā.
HellMap (2025-05-25 14:17:50+00:00): Tātad vai nu https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143752379 izmaiņa bija nepareiza vai atkal pa jaunu aiztaisīja. Vai man pašam sategot vai tu apsekoji un sategosi?
somehundred (2025-05-25 14:25:40+00:00): Tur nekad nav bijis vaļā kopš pirmoreiz aiztaisīja. Tā izmaiņa bija nepareiza. Es izlabošu.
eggie (2025-05-16 12:01:07+00:00): Dag Knilessew,

Ik heb de algemene accesstags access=destination verwijderd, want er is al specifiek getagd met motor_vehicle=no
Daar vallen moped en mofa niet onder dus die toegevoegd met yes.
Laat maar weten of het klopt.
Wanneer er hier alleen Eigen Weg zonder verbodsbord staat dan hoort de toegang met =permissive aan gegeven te worden. 

MVG
eggie
felipeeugenio (2025-05-16 13:28:52+00:00): Those are swimming pools. Not natural=water
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166345995
Tomas Straupis (2025-05-16 12:31:50+00:00): Sveiki. Mano galva tai pavadinimas yra „Artea“, o ne „„Artea“ bankas“. Kad bankas mes žinome iš to, kad yra žyma amenity=bank. Kaip ir svetainė gi yra artea.lt, o ne areabankas.lt
felipeeugenio (2025-05-16 13:15:17+00:00): That is not the form of the actual shimming pool.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166346764
aixbrick (2025-05-20 12:50:30+00:00): Hallo,
was ist denn die Quelle, dass sich hier eine Haltestelle befindet? Bei https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=50.9720968&lng=6.1420121&z=17&pKey=2815907505214471&focus=photo sieht man nur einen erhöhten Bordstein.
Gruß
Spixi (2025-05-20 13:42:50+00:00): Die Haltestelle hat noch kein Vz 224, aber ein Haltestellenmast und die Zuwegung zu der Haltestelle sind bereits vorhanden. Die Haltestelle wird erst mit Fertigstellung der Brücke in Betrieb genommen, dann kann nämlich die Haltestelle in der Straße Am Alten Wasserwerk nicht mehr angefahren werden.
aixbrick (2025-05-20 15:23:12+00:00): Dann lösche bitte die Daten oder setze zumindest ein https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix ("proposed"). Das bloße Vorhandensein eines Mastes und der Zuwegung reicht nicht, damit das als existierende Haltestelle gemappt wird.
Spixi (2025-05-20 22:20:22+00:00): Danke dir, ich habe das Präfix gesetzt. Der Bau der Brücke sollte bald beginnen: https://geilenkirchen-lokal.de/archive/69948
aixbrick (2025-05-21 07:34:48+00:00): Danke
felipeeugenio (2025-05-16 13:13:20+00:00): Hello. You can square the pools by pressing Q.

Regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166347403
Andrew Chadwick (2025-05-16 15:33:43+00:00): Hi there, wongataa!

Please can you clarify why you did this? Is there a local consensus I'm not familiar with?  At least some of those are signalized, literal stop lines on the circulating way, and I assume you know the argument against using highway=roundabout for those already.

Amusingly, I've been around the area fixing things in the other direction just hours after this changeset, and it's clipped this box. I don't want to tread on any local conventions, and edit wars are bad, so how shall we resolve this?
wongataa (2025-05-16 17:39:15+00:00): Having traffic lights does not stop these junctions being roundabouts. The signposts approaching them use roundabout symbols. If the traffic lights are not working they would be navigated as roundabouts. Also many of them didn't always have traffic lights when built and were roundabouts then. Adding traffic lights to a roundabout doesn't stop it being a roundabout.

These junctions were tagged as roundabouts in the past. 

Changing roundabouts to circular junctions just because they have traffic lights is not a good idea.

In the UK a circular is a rare type of junction. Some do exist.
Andrew Chadwick (2025-05-16 18:09:16+00:00): I think we disagree here.

Tagging them as junction=circular also doesn't stop them from being "roundabouts" in the UK sense either, and nor does it make them "traffic circles" or any other term used locally. The two OSM tags have well-defined and different meanings, independent (we hope) of language and place. Other countries will have different words and shadings of meaning too, but this definition is OSM's.

I don't think we can just locally and individually insist on any definitions other than the agreed ones in the wiki really, not for something as well established as these tags. These definitions and the new distinction between them are well established OSM practice for nearly 9 years now, whether we like the tags or not:

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Dcircular (since Nov 2016, distinction discussed in the tagging mailing list)
- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Droundabout (documented since Feb 2007)

If they have traffic signals and stop lines on the circulating way, you do not have complete, unrestricted right of way whilst on them. Therefore they are tagged as junction=circular, whether or not that's also a term for something local to the UK that's not a standardised roundabout.

Did you discuss these changes with anyone else?

How are you selecting candidates for these changes, and applying the edits?
wongataa (2025-05-17 07:21:39+00:00): I did read the wiki before doing anything and no I didn't discuss anything, maybe I should have.

If you look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Droundabout#Signal-controlled_roundabouts it specifically states that signal controlled roundabouts it is suggested that the roundabout tags is retained.  At least one junction I did change doesn't have all sections signalled controlled so that one should definitely still be tagged a a roundabout.

In the UK everyone will call signal controlled roundabouts roundabouts.

None of the junctions has anything stated here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Dcircular#Distinguishing_from_roundabouts which definitely makes them not roundabouts.

I only changed junctions in the area I live that I have used and know about.
Andrew Chadwick (2025-05-17 15:18:40+00:00): I started an open-ended consensus feeler thread on Community yesterday but didn't drop a link here. Sorry about that, here it is: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/uk-consensus-on-junction-circular-is-there-any/130196   It might be more productive to get this discussion out of change nags and onto there. Can we continue the discussion there?

I think there's an ambiguity in reality-vs.-wiki-vs.-database we need to address a bit more openly.

----------------------

I think the wiki text you cited on wiki:Tag:junction=roundabout needs fixing or removing[1], now that junction=circular exists. It contradicts the bit at the top of the same page that states:

> The tag junction=roundabout is used only on road intersections where traffic on the roundabout has right of way.
> That is, the roundabout itself should be ***free from all intersection controls including traffic signals, stop signs or stop markings, give-way (or yield) signs or give-way markings.***

(my highlighting)

It doesn't matter what we call a thing, it ought to converge to what the wiki page says for something this established[2]. And that's sadly contradictory in the current revision.

[1] the text you cite predates the junction=circular tag:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:junction%3Droundabout&diff=prev&oldid=872524

Me I think there should just be one junction=round_thing tag *and* some namespaced attributes to cover overall RoW. But that ship has sailed a long time ago.

[2] … although wiki page adjustments to approach reality and database content are valid too, and part of the process
matmak_ (2025-05-16 12:29:11+00:00): krivo to je
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166348116
totera (2025-05-16 14:34:38+00:00): Ciao dp7, non conosco il posto, ma dalle immagini aeree quelle superfici in gomma nel parco giochi sembrano effettivamente presenti. Perché cancellarle?
dp7 (2025-05-16 15:20:18+00:00): Ciao Totera
Erano indicate come aree pedonali ma si tratta di "tappeti" in gomma per proteggere i bambini dalle cadute nei giochi pubblici: non mi sembravano quindi taggati correttamente, anche perchè gli stessi giochi sono già mappati.
ivanbranco (2025-05-16 22:29:57+00:00): Alcuni giochi, secondo la wiki, si possono mappare come aree. Si potrebbe unire gli elementi, cancellando highway=pedestrian, per mantenere l'informazione sulla superficie. Inoltre si possono usare come inner del multipoligono prato, in quanto li erba non ce n'è.
ivanbranco (2025-05-16 22:58:33+00:00): Pensandoci su, e con l'aiuto di altri mapper, penso che ripristinerò gli elementi mappandoli con landcover=*, che a differenza di surface=* si può utilizzare da solo.
multimodaal (2025-05-25 21:02:32+00:00): Hoi, bedankt voor je bijdrage. Er is -ook gelet op de changeset-omschrijving iets niet helemaal goed gegaan.  Het pad van de MTB-trail is opgeknipt en een deel heeft ook in name= de naam van de relatie gekregen. Dat is niet de  bedoeling, de naam van de relatie staat op de relatie en wordt niet herhaald op de individuele paden.  Repareer je het zelf?

Bedankt en groet!
Zie ook: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1387282499 
en https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name#When_not_to_use " general, name=* is supposed to contain solely the name, and not the description, type, location or other properties of an object (such as height, elevation, operator, access restrictions, classification/certification/quality labels...). See Name is the name only."
=> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
Herwescheluc (2025-05-16 20:22:24+00:00): Hallo, GeoMH,
Heißt das wirklich "Mudturadas's" oder wie auf der website "Mudturadas"?
Grüße aus Herborn
Andreas
GeoMH (2025-05-17 06:10:45+00:00): Hallo Andreas,
auf dem Schild am Laden und an der Straße steht "Mudturada's".
siehe:
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1593092554870186
Ich habe auf jeden Fall ein "s" zuviel eingetippt. Danke für den Hinweis.
Welche Schreibweise sollte auf OSM verwendet werden? Die von der Website oder die vom Ladenschild?
Grüße Jens
Herwescheluc (2025-05-17 09:14:32+00:00): Guten Morgen, Jens,
on-the-ground geht vor...
Grüße
Andreas
eggie (2025-05-16 13:20:55+00:00): Tip... amenity=community_centre 
Gr eggie
NorthCrab_upload (2025-05-16 13:11:09+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12842167127

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Herwescheluc (2025-05-16 21:01:06+00:00): Hallo, Maximilian Brandau,

prinzipiell eine tolle Aktion und gern gesehen! Zumindest solange Du nicht irgendwo aus unzulässigen Quellen "abgeschrieben" hast. Woher hast Du diese massenhaften Infos? Bist Du bei der FFW oder der Gemeinde tätig? Oder sogar selbst mit der Cam rumgelaufen? Solltest Du als "source" zum Änderungssatz zufügen, der sicher viel Mühe war - und wohl nochmal wird!

Denn ich muss Dich leider bitten, insgesamt nachzuarbeiten, da Du in OSM übliche Konventionen nicht beachtet hast. Im Wiki findest Du unter https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:emergency=fire%20hydrant?uselang=de eine komplette Anleitung zum effektiven Mappen von Hydranten, die sicherlich kaum Fragen offen läßt und Dir hier Hilfestellung gibt.

Insbesondere das "name"-Tag solltest Du unbedingt wieder ändern und zahlreiche zusätzlich mögliche weitere Angaben sind zudem sehr nützlich, wenn man, wie Du, offenbar weiß, wo die Hydranten sind und was man "fachmännisch" da findet.

Eine Frage habe ich noch zu "disused"-Hydranten: Was macht die aus? Sind die verschweißt oder überasphaltiert? Ansonsten frage ich neugierig, was das bedeutet und ich mir da vor Ort vorstellen muss...

Viele Grüße aus Herborn

Andreas
Herwescheluc (2025-05-18 16:36:42+00:00): Hallo, Maximilian Brandau,

habe im Forum eine Diskussion zu diesem CS gestartet (https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/masseneintragung-hydranten-400-1-cs-in-schoffengrund/130262), an der Du Dich gerne beteiligen kannst! Würde mich freuen, wenn Du dort (wenn denn nicht hier) Dein Tun erklären würdest.

Grüße aus Herborn
Andreas
eggie (2025-05-16 13:28:26+00:00): Welkom bij OSM,
Bedankt voor uw bijdrage. 
Je verwijderde nummer 29 van de kaart en verdubbelde nr 33?
De info heb ik samengevoegd. Het verdwenen adres hersteld.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-05-16 15:00:43+00:00): Dag Jaap.. Ik heb sport aangepast naar field_hockey en er tevens een clubhuis van gemaakt. Sporttags renderen helaas nog niet in Carto.
MVG
eggie
evgenykatyshev (2025-05-16 15:15:04+00:00): Name tag has to be in Georgian in Georgia. I fixed
BáthoryPéter (2025-09-25 07:30:27+00:00): Nézem, melyik hülye szórakozik itt az aeroway=helipad taggel. Ortofotó bekapcsol, leeset áll visszarak… Ja hogy a NER
grin (2025-09-30 19:26:30+00:00): Ráadásul szokott is ott parkolni egy kis piros pörgettyűs, nem tudom, hogy ha megpróbálom lefotózni akkor lelő-e egy erős orosz akcentussal kiabáló kopasz.
SekeRob (2025-05-17 05:52:40+00:00): Ciao,

Confuso, Contrada Crocefisso, ma cambia i nome del strada a Via Crocifisso..???
jokr192 (2025-05-17 11:01:41+00:00): Ciao,
La strada non aveva un nome visibile, quindi l’ho aggiornata io :)
marczoutendijk (2025-12-03 19:35:51+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/773652678#map=19/51.282157/4.703484
What is the use of adding area=yes and highway=track to an existing highway=track?
os-emmer (2025-12-03 19:50:36+00:00): I did not create the object, I just updated the tagging. I didn't want to delete the area. That way the shape/area of the highway is mapped to. I do not know if there is consensus on how to map road-areas. If you know a better way feel free to update the tagging.
marczoutendijk (2025-12-03 19:54:35+00:00): Thanks for replying. I know you didn't create the object, but at least you changed the tagging.
The problem is that there is absolutely no consensus on OSM on how to tag those area=* situations.
CurlingMan13 (2025-05-17 20:59:27+00:00): Welcome to OSM.   You can use "Q" to square the buildings and give them proper corners.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166354455
the-wouter (2025-05-16 17:34:15+00:00): Hey Robin,

Volgens mij zijn dit de fietskluizen van de NS op het station, en die lijken volgens de website per maand te worden gehuurd: https://www.ns.nl/fietsenstallingen/info/station-veendam-fietskluis

Dan zou access=private denk ik beter passen. Mee eens dat ik het aanpas?
Robin van der Linde (2025-05-16 20:14:19+00:00): Heb hem nu naar access=members gezet, past volgens de wiki volgens mij vrij aardig: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dbicycle_parking
the-wouter (2025-05-17 11:44:28+00:00): Prima 👍
NorthCrab_upload (2025-05-16 14:41:12+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1387300679

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
0235 (2025-05-17 00:13:12+00:00): Thank-you, This is something I did not know. I will try and look out for a few more in my area (as I know there are a few traffic-light controlled junctions like this), and re-tag appropriately, but which the Overpass query may not have detected
Andrew Chadwick (2025-05-17 15:28:26+00:00): Before you do that, I think me and @wongataa stumbled on an ambiguity on the wiki page(s) themselves - my little changes crossed into theirs: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166347580

There's some disagreement in what's right for UK tagging, and an ambiguity on the wiki page we ought to resolve. This place is pretty terrible for discussions, so it might be worth discussing it on the community forum. I'll follow up to the thread I started there, and try to gather some consensus:

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/uk-consensus-on-junction-circular-is-there-any/130196
user_5359 (2025-05-18 06:19:46+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1387304857. What is the mean of the tag WijnGoeroe = jubileumproeverij?
ReBoNL (2025-05-18 08:58:32+00:00): Error. Please remove it.
Syl (2025-08-16 09:31:58+00:00): Bonjour, après vérification sur place j'ai annulé ces modifications, le dsc est toujours là.
Glassman (2025-05-17 22:26:38+00:00): I don't see any mention of a garden on the parks website. Can you confirm it exists? I'll send you more info on the park in a message.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166356685
Ranger Kel (2025-05-17 22:47:43+00:00): Hello,

The garden does exist. I am a parks employee. We have created a separate website for the garden but have not yet published it. When the parks website is redesigned, we will place a link to to the native plant garden website.
NeisReview (2025-05-27 13:51:10+00:00): Hi, vielen Dank für das Mappen des restlichen Flowtrails. 

Ich war gestern ebenfalls mal wieder da und habe mittels ein paar GPS Tracks weiter versucht den Detailgrad zu verbessern. Schau es Dir gerne einmal an. Bei manchen Tags war ich mir nicht 100% sicher, das OSM Wiki gibt hier aber auch nicht immer etwas her. Bei den Uphill-Passagen ist glaube bei dir etwas schief gelaufen. Habe versucht dies zu korrigieren.

Als Ergebnis ist bei mir jetzt eine Relation entstanden: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19180441

Nochmals Danke & Beste Grüße, Pascal
pitscheplatsch (2025-05-27 13:52:14+00:00): Sorry, mein Kommentar hätte mit diesem Account geschrieben werden sollen.

Pascal
trailschneck (2025-05-28 04:30:59+00:00): Nee, mach nur. Ich hatte da nur etwas rumgemappt weil da vorher so ziemlich rein gar nix war und man die Wege mittlerweile mit dem Strava Heatmap-Overlay toll sehen konnte. Ich fahr jetzt kein MTB aber vielleicht werd ich die Trails mal irgendwann in der Winterpause zu Fuß ablaufen.

Gruss Siegfried
YomanNH (2025-05-16 21:19:14+00:00): Z jakiego powodu usunąłeś oznaczenia nasypu, na którym znajdują się tory tramwajowe? Chodzi o te trzy linie:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1336295027/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1336295028/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1336295029/history
YomanNH (2025-05-21 20:37:29+00:00): Ignorujesz komentarze, więc sam przywróciłem nasypy, które usunąłeś. W przyszłości nie usuwaj prawidłowych obiektów i reaguj na komentarze.
Glassman (2025-05-17 22:20:31+00:00): There was already a parking area where you added the parking node. Can you remove the node?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166357277
Glassman (2025-05-17 22:21:24+00:00): Is the tree actually gone? it shows in the imagery?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166357277
Ranger Kel (2025-05-17 22:46:17+00:00): Hello,

I believe I added a dumpster and an info sign, not a parking node?
Ranger Kel (2025-05-17 22:49:17+00:00): I did not remove any tree? I removed a recycle bin as it does not exist.
Glassman (2025-05-17 22:49:26+00:00): You are correct. The node and the parking lot polygon were so close I selected the wrong feature. Sorry about that. 

I take it from your user name you are the park ranger. Welcome to OSM. It's always nice to see the people responsible for the parks contribute to OSM.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166357277
Ranger Kel (2025-05-17 22:53:03+00:00): I see now I placed the garbage dumpster on the parking path. I relocated it so that it is no longer a parking node and it is more accurate location.
Ranger Kel (2025-05-17 22:56:07+00:00): Thank you! I am new to OSM, but am trying to map our park features as accurately as possible :)

I will be adding more as I can verify their exact locations.
Glassman (2025-05-18 00:06:02+00:00): Check out https://osmcha.org/changesets/166357277 to see the tree that was removed.
woodpeck (2025-05-16 15:48:40+00:00): Hi there Frankarkohpaintsil, the "changeset comment" is intended to be an explanation of your mapping so that others can see what you have been doing. "Uccyouthmappers16" is not a good changeset comment because it doesn't say anything about your mapping. Better put something like "added buildings" or whatever it is you did! Also, you can combine several edits in one upload, you don't need to upload for every single house.
ilias_ (2025-05-16 17:57:40+00:00): Pleasesave your changes before moving on to another place, your changesets are huge
SafwatHalaby (2025-05-17 07:16:58+00:00): Seconded. It would be great if you reduce your changeset size by splitting per country or something.
mike140 (2025-05-17 07:49:19+00:00): Доброго дня! Є декілька зауважень по ваших правках: не потрібно видаляти та малювати новий будинок, якщо він трохи зміщений - треба перемістити його та відкоригувати форму; щодо зміщень - є таке поняття як зсув фонового зображення - його треба корегувати, про це та дещо інше можна прочитати тут: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:%D0%93%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%BD%D1%96_%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87%D0%BA%D0%B8. Ви пересунули вулицю під зображення Bing, але у нього в цьому місці погана прив'язка. Краще використовуйте зображення Esri. Форму будинків можна вирівняти, натиснувши Q
Fizzie-DWG (2025-05-20 01:50:12+00:00): DWG revert -poor quality

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166501899
Andrew Chadwick (2025-05-16 16:11:25+00:00): Hi there, again. Was this change discussed somewhere in a way that I'm not aware of? 

I've checked the last couple of months of Talk-GB, Talk-gb-westmidlands, and in community.openstreetmap.org, and I can't find anything to suggest consensus this way. Something more local, or something I've missed?

It's the exact opposite of something I want to do in my area, further south, and directly opposite to what the wiki says, so please let us know.
Andrew Chadwick (2025-05-16 16:12:10+00:00): Actually, more than "something I want to do". Established local convention in the Oxford area, at least.
maro21 (2025-05-18 14:10:58+00:00): Do you know that you can't use Wikipedia as a source? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Collaboration_with_Wikipedia
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-05-30 22:10:18+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with malformed tag values

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183420131
Dani CS (2025-06-01 12:26:57+00:00): Bonjour ! Pour information, way/1256875817 n'est pas un tunnel=culvert. Le chemin passe par un pont. J'ai corrigé hier.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166358238