piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NorthCrab_upload (2023-10-19 01:10:31+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11273403399
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11273403400

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Glassman (2023-10-19 18:35:25+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142788643
NorthCrab_upload (2023-10-19 01:20:31+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11273405814

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Glassman (2023-10-19 18:40:56+00:00): #TIP: we spell out street names in OSM - the reason is that software has a hard time unabbreviating.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142788880
Glassman (2023-10-19 18:38:52+00:00): #TIP: mobile homes are tagged as building=static_caravan. OSM was started in England so we use their terms and classifications
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142789046
Glassman (2023-10-19 18:43:26+00:00): #TIP: square building by selecting their outline then just type a "q". Also try to follow the roof outline when adding them.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142789133
Justin Leon (2023-10-19 02:01:15+00:00): #cwugeog
Glassman (2023-10-19 18:48:39+00:00): It looks like you extended the school bdg over the existing service road. If the road extends through the building, it should be tagged appropriately.  see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tunnel

If not can you shorten the road?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142789215
Kovoschiz (2023-10-19 09:54:34+00:00): Please  take care not to remove `building=` when adding `man_made=pumping_station` . They are different aspects. Also the latter doesn't render.
Glassman (2023-10-19 18:50:32+00:00): #TIP: you can connect the waterway by just adding a culvert where it goes below the road. Same wiki article as the building passage one.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142789470
Glassman (2023-10-19 18:50:51+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142789554
Glassman (2023-10-19 18:59:37+00:00): By making this a oneway road, it would be impossible to ever get out. Also - we spell out street names in OSM - the reason is that software has a hard time unabberviating.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142789565
Glassman (2023-10-19 19:00:12+00:00): Can you spell out the streetname?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142789580
Almansoor Educion (2023-10-19 02:09:58+00:00): "مركز المنصور التعليمي : - دروس دعم و تقوية . - مراجعات ما قبل الإمتحانات. - جميع المراحل الدراسية من الإبتدائي إلى الجامعة . - كل المواد و كل المناهج. - تعلم مختلف اللغات : الإنجليزية و الفرنسية .... -مجموعة من أفضل المدرسين و المدرسات الخبرة بالمناهج القطرية و الدولية
Glassman (2023-10-19 18:39:09+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142789631
MxxCon (2023-10-19 05:30:08+00:00): Hello.
Since you already added amenity=place_of_worship tag to the building it's not a good idea to create a node with the same tag because that goes against  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142789649
Glassman (2023-10-19 19:19:33+00:00): Parking lots are typically added as a polygon not a node.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142789664
Glassman (2023-10-19 19:20:09+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142789725
Glassman (2023-10-19 18:44:12+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142789884
Glassman (2023-10-19 19:23:36+00:00): TIP: instead of removing the building, just update the polygon. This saves the history of the object. Also, square the building by selecting the outline then just type a "q"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142789965
Glassman (2023-10-19 18:44:25+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142789987
Glassman (2023-10-19 18:44:38+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142790089
OptikalCrow (2023-10-27 19:41:59+00:00): This changeset looks pretty good too, the only thing I would advise is that "closed=" is not really a key that's in use. To indicate a shop is closed and a building is vacant, you can change the "shop=" to a "disused:shop=". This allows you to still specify what kind of shop it was, but also makes sure that any of the third parties who use OSM data know it's not currently open, because they may not know about the tag "closed=permanently." 

If it's more run down and fully abandoned, you can also use "abandoned:shop" and "abandoned:building", but if it's still in good shape and the building could be re-opened with only some cleanup work then disused is the best tag.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142790174
MxxCon (2023-10-19 05:38:21+00:00): Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you delete solar panels node from this building? It appears to be correctly mapped.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142790209
zreila (2023-11-02 22:33:29+00:00): opps it didnt look like it
Glassman (2023-10-19 19:24:06+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142790290
Glassman (2023-10-19 19:25:28+00:00): mailbox stations typically don't have names. Also - this would be really large. Can you redo it. Maybe make it a node until imagery is available.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142790353
Snusmumriken (2023-10-19 06:02:54+00:00): Hej

En kommentar gällande dina förändringar, jag ser att du använder iD redigeraren, tyvärr så kommer den med förslag som inte passar SL-området. All busstrafik inom SL är taggad med den förenklade modellen. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sweden/Public_transport#F.C3.B6renklad_PT-taggning_f.C3.B6r_bussar
Bara ignorera förslagen som iD kommer med gällande busshållplatser
Glassman (2023-10-19 19:26:52+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142790502
Glassman (2023-10-19 19:28:03+00:00): The building covers two homes. Can you draw each house separately? Also they shouldn't be named. Model homes are only temporary until someone buy one.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142790502
Glassman (2023-10-19 19:28:14+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142790604
Glassman (2023-10-19 19:33:23+00:00): Way too large. I'm going to revert.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142790604
Glassman (2023-10-19 19:36:57+00:00): You changed the building to building=commercial but it is a church. Is that correct?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142790831
Glassman (2023-10-19 19:44:27+00:00): The viewpoint polygon looks like it should be amenity=parking. 

Try to avoid connect features like paths to admin boundaries. It makes updating the boundary much more difficult. 

Also - save and upload your work before moving to a distant location.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142791040
user_5359 (2023-10-30 06:33:00+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1216678838 (one of one hundert twenty eight objects). What is the mean of the tags
capture_dates_range = 5/20/2020-7/1/2020
release = 2
Please notice we use the date notation yyyy-mm-dd instead of dd/mm/yyyy.
David Peters (2023-10-30 16:25:37+00:00): That's leftover data from the Microsoft building outlines. Should I purge it?
user_5359 (2023-10-30 20:52:30+00:00): Was deleted by https://www.osm.org/changeset/143382157.
Glassman (2023-10-19 19:37:49+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142791225
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2023-10-19 04:06:45+00:00): note 3947604, 3947607, 3947605
seattlefyi (2023-10-19 16:15:02+00:00): Hi - for these types of features, the OSM wiki describes the tagging as "building=livestock" and "livestock=laying_hens" (if that's what the chickens main job is). Will send an email with more instructions.
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2023-10-19 04:02:27+00:00): note 3947617, 3947616, 3947615, 3947613
수원수원수원 (2023-11-16 12:33:43+00:00): 안녕하세요.

수원시의 정조로가 일부 구간은 3차도로인데 일부 구간은 2차 도로입니다. 의도하신 것인지 아니면 조정하시다가 일부 구간을 깜빡하신 것인지 확인 부탁드립니다.

감사합니다.
aaei924 (2023-11-17 03:36:26+00:00): 안녕하세요, 제가 미처 편집하지 못한 구간이 많이 있습니다. 앞으로도 이런 경우가 보이신다면 적절히 편집 부탁드립니다. 감사합니다.
seattlefyi (2023-10-19 23:37:31+00:00): Hi, I changed the building tag to building=detached, and removed the descriptive name.
Adam Schneider (2023-12-20 17:44:23+00:00): "Not maintained in winter" is very different from "unmaintained track."  The Steens Mountain Loop Road (along with the Kiger, Summit, and East Rim roads) is wide, smooth, and regularly maintained.
MappingJunkie (2023-12-20 18:05:26+00:00): I am following the decision tree provided at osm.org.  Is there one of the items I have incorrectly flagged as "no" below that would indicate it should be an "unclassified" highway?  Happy to make the change.
 

How to decide
Some examples where highway=track is generally not appropriate:

No. (does not connect to GP road network) A road that is minor but serves as a connection in the general-purpose road network. See highway=unclassified.
No. (No residences along it) A minor road with permanent residences along it. See highway=residential.
No (No permanent residences). A minor road providing primary access to one or several permanent residences (driveway). See highway=service.
No (No commercial or industrial facility, unless the towers would be considered). A minor road providing primary access to a commercial or industrial facility. See highway=service.
No (Wide enought to be a highway) A trail or path that is not wide enough for a typical four-wheeled motor vehicle [2]. See highway=path, footway, cycleway, and bridleway.
If none of the above are true for a road, and its primary use is access to the surrounding land, highway=track is likely appropriate. Some examples:

No. A farm track used for access to crop fields, pastures, orchards or similar agricultural land.
No. A forest road used for outdoor recreation, logging, or other forestry purposes (aka, forest track, woods road, logging road)
No. A fire road used for fighting wildfires in grassland, scrubland, and forestland.
No. A minor road used for access to conservation land.
Yes. A dirt track used for access to the mountains, desert, or other remote area.
Ref: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtrack
Adam Schneider (2023-12-20 19:28:12+00:00): Note that the examples on that page are not really a "decision tree," they're just examples. The Steens Mountain Loop Road doesn't really fit any of the "no" or "yes" cases here (because it's not a "minor" road).  It's a well-used, well-maintained road that is advertised to the general public as a scenic drive.

Aside from the bullet points, this is really more of a "you know it when you see it" situation.  A rule of thumb that I use is that if you can see two ruts in the ground, it's probably a track.  If it's a wide expanse of continuous gravel where two cars could easily pass each other and you can't see the double-track, it's probably "unclassified" (or possibly tertiary, although that's not common for gravel roads except in really remote areas that have no other roads).

An objective way to evaluate the road class out in the hinterlands is to check the raw USFS or BLM data: https://gbp-blm-egis.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/BLM-EGIS::blm-or-ground-transportation-gtrn-roads-line-hub/explore — in this case, the loop road's attributes are: RoadClass="Collector"; CartoRoad="Major road"; MaintInt = "MAINTENANCE INTENSITY 5."  Anything with MaintInt of 3 or better is probably not a track.
MappingJunkie (2023-12-22 17:10:08+00:00): Makes sense, I can revert this back.  Can you point me to a wiki page that describes track vs highway mapping for the USA?  I haven't been able to find anything that outlines this topic definitively.  The BLM website looks quite helpful for sorting out road types.  I am not convinced they maintain this road to a Level 5 given that it is still closed after the washout a couple of years ago.  A residential road is certainly maintained to a higher level.  I worry that tagging as unclassified sends the message that the road is maintained to a higher level than this (plowed in winter, repaired after storms, etc).
Adam Schneider (2023-12-28 00:44:28+00:00): This page has very general info: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States_roads_tagging — it says you should use tertiary, unclassified, service, and track for USFS and BLM roads, but doesn't say how to make the distinction.  (However, it does give this useful bit of advice: "A road can be classified highway=track if the road is insignificant in the road network, for example: logging roads, agricultural roads, and roads that don't service anything of significant public importance."  The roads on Steens Mountain lead to a lot of stuff that is of "public importance.")  You mostly just have to use common sense and see how it's been done elsewhere, like in National Forests.  "Track" really shouldn't be used for a road that people would be perfectly happy driving their Toyota Camry on. :)

And winter maintenance should definitely not be used to decide a mountain road's highway category. The majority of USFS/BLM roads above 4000' — including many of the paved ones — are inaccessible in the winter, but that doesn't mean they aren't important roads.  If you really want to tag unplowed roads, you could use the "snowplowing" or "winter_service" tags: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:snowplowing https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:winter_service
Glassman (2023-10-19 19:40:35+00:00): building=service is for small ones housing pumps or transformers. I would recommend looking a building=commercial or building=industrial. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Buildings
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142792120
Glassman (2023-10-19 19:46:54+00:00): You added a building tag to a large landuse grass area at Kalles Junior High School. Can you fix?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142793162
Glassman (2023-10-19 19:48:05+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142793526
Felipe Kinoshita (2023-10-19 05:29:05+00:00): really sorry about these changes, it won't happen again
Malý hajzl (2023-10-30 15:45:47+00:00): "highway: service" je viditelné na openstreet mapě. Na používání v TomTom ti seru! Mají své mapové podklady https://mydrive.tomtom.com/en_gb/#mode=viewport+viewport=49.93816,18.22167,16.38,0,-0+ver=3
Flamen_Sru (2023-11-01 08:11:54+00:00): Thank you for feedback. I will analyze situation and come back to you.
Flamen_Sru (2023-11-03 11:10:20+00:00): Hi Malý hajzl, Thank you so much, I have analyzed the changes and restored the data to previous version.
Glassman (2023-10-19 19:49:39+00:00): You removed the name Bradley's Taekwondo but left the tag leisure=fitness_centre. Is it still a fitness center?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142794053
Glassman (2023-10-19 19:50:29+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142794204
Glassman (2023-10-19 19:51:55+00:00): You added a building overlapping with an existing building. When more than one business is in a building, just use nodes for each. I fixed it.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142794204
lefuturiste (2023-10-21 14:32:42+00:00): Salut, est-ce que tu peut regarder pourquoi on a qu'un seul arrêt de bus "Mairie Val d'Hazey" qui a été importé, alors qu'il y en a clairement deux
mga_geo (2023-10-21 20:21:31+00:00): Un des nœuds n'avait d'attribut "name"
KasperSFranz (2023-10-19 06:14:22+00:00): Hey, Why did you change the building farm_auxiliary from an area to a relation? 
The wiki is specifying that it is not valid to add on a relation :) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building=farm%20auxiliary?uselang=en

Thank you
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142794288
Glassman (2023-10-19 19:52:15+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142794317
Glassman (2023-10-19 19:52:30+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142794337
Glassman (2023-10-19 19:52:49+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142794368
Glassman (2023-10-19 19:53:06+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142794488
Glassman (2023-10-19 19:53:28+00:00): Each hanger should be drawn separately. Can you fix?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142794488
Glassman (2023-10-19 19:53:46+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142794620
Glassman (2023-10-19 19:54:01+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142794657
Glassman (2023-10-19 19:54:39+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142794722
PierreV79 (2023-10-21 15:06:33+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai un gros doute sur des travaux effectués très récemment  dans cette zone pour des éoliennes et lignes électriques. Deplus a moins que google me joue des tours, pas trace d'enquête publique? Idem pour un autre changeset du coté de La Ronde...
Glassman (2023-10-19 19:55:00+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142794807
eggie (2023-10-19 10:19:25+00:00): Welkom bij OSM.
Bedankt voor uw bijdrage..
De info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode en Wittenburgstraat 2 weer teruggezet.
Wanneer dat adres niet meer klopt kunt u dit door geven aan het Kadaster. Alle adresnodes worden periodiek geupdated.
Een terugmelding kunt u hier doen. 
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/?searchQuery=wittenburgstraat+2&objectId=0299200000453113&theme=BRT+Achtergrond&geometry.x=202449.5495&geometry.y=437941.618&zoomlevel=15

MVG
eggie
emersonveenstra (2023-10-19 10:18:00+00:00): Reverted for building deletion vandalism in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142806452
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-30 04:05:56+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143341935
szydzio (2023-10-19 17:07:57+00:00): 👍
Langlaeufer (2023-10-19 13:44:42+00:00): Na so sieht es garantiert nicht aus.
Entweder die Abfahrt nach Berlin ist komplett gesperrt oder gar nicht. bitte auch den highway-Wert in constuction=* behalten.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142796345
Nadjita (2023-10-19 19:26:32+00:00): Ich will Deine Arbeit nicht korrigieren, sondern hab die fehlenden Baustellen, bei denen ich mir sicher war, ergänzt. Wenn Du mehr kennst, trage sie doch einfach ein :o)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142796345
Nielkrokodil (2023-12-26 12:35:45+00:00): Hallo Hreid,
bei der Erstellung dieses Kreisverkehres sind Bus-Routen-Relationen kaputt gegangen. Ich habe das jetzt korrigiert. Bitte immer aufpassen, dass das nicht passiert. Oder, falls du dir nicht sicher bist, woe man es einträgt, einen Hinweis hinterlassen. 
LG Nielkrokodil
gscholz (2023-10-27 07:08:18+00:00): HI duckey,
this changeset has created a lot of errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines and overlapping buildings:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=81.21207&lat=8.65467&zoom=18&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=142796950

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
kubahahaha (2023-10-25 21:37:08+00:00): Tu jest biuro firmy? Jest jakiś budynek którego nie ma na mapie?
Metzor (2023-10-20 09:19:02+00:00): Hallo Bruno413,

Bei Wikitag-Hinmachen hast du das highway-Tag gelöscht. Ich habs jetzt wieder drangemacht, weil sonst ist das Routing einer wichtigen Straße futsch.
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/26678329

Falls da gerade Baustelle ist, bitte entsprechend taggen...

Schöne Grüße
Metzor