piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
silversurfer83 (2026-03-27 20:15:36+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM :) (bei 5 Änderungen passt das noch)

Ich hätte ein paar Hinweise:

- du hast https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/815041995 hier erst einen Zaun gelöscht um dann das landuse=* Objekt auch mit barrier=fence zu taggen. Das ist nicht optimal, da es dem Grundsatz One Feature, One OSM-Object wiederspricht. Ein Zaun ist ein Objekt und die substation ist ein anderes Objekt. Sie sollten nicht auf ein und dasselbe OSM-Objekt gemappt werden.

Das wars eigentlich auch schon :)

happy mapping

bei Fragen immer raus damit. Zb. unter wiki.osm.org oder c.osm.org oder bei Signal
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180487779
Vis_M (2026-03-29 15:08:31+00:00): This was a bad edit from out dated data. Do NOT over ride community edit nonsensically. You are simply ruining OSM with your outdated data
eggie (2026-03-27 08:11:06+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback   .. Lijkt me oke. De aansluiting met de Bijvang heb ik aangepast. 
https://www.verbeterdekaart.nl/#?geometry.x=103060.33&geometry.y=397871.6&zoomlevel=15.04

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
A67-A67 (2026-04-07 14:57:31+00:00): This cafe has already been mapped. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13630912418

I'll remove this duplicate.
Bienson (2026-03-27 23:42:52+00:00): Falsches Tag
eggie (2026-03-27 08:13:42+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback De info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode,
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
NeisBot (2026-03-27 08:21:46+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13682162806 v4

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Biuro nieruchomości"
---
Na przykład, bardziej neutralna i obiektywna wersja Twojego tekstu mogłaby brzmieć: "Biuro nieruchomości"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
lumoestate (2026-03-27 08:25:07+00:00): Opis, mówi tylko o tym czym się zajmuje działalność, bez SEO
Vis_M (2026-03-29 14:33:47+00:00): These edits are very bad and clueless. Why did you disrupt bus relations of Kerala? Are you a bot?
Pipeton (2026-03-27 11:47:25+00:00): Hola, parece que has importado muchas cosas de una vez, porque el conjunto de cambios cubre toda la ciudad aunque casi todo está en el Campus de Cartuja.

Ahora sobre el Colegio Máximo, que es el área que tengo más controlada: no tendrías que haberlo importado porque la importación no ha aportado información nueva, te has cargado información que había puesto a base de observación (un pequeño trozo de edificio en el jardín norte y la entrada), has duplicado varias partes y has cambiado la posición a una menos correcta.

Si puedes, revierte esta parte, por favor.
kapazao (2026-03-27 12:57:02+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambios solo he hecho importación en la zona del Campus de Cartuja, lo que pasa que como se ha tocado una pequeña parte de la zona de bajas emisiones pues sale que ocupa más de lo que es.
Puedes comprobarlo en OSMCha (https://osmcha.org/changesets/180490140).

En el Colegio Máximo no encuentro el problema. Tan solo se han reemplazado geometrías y recolocado con imágenes por satélite. No se elimina nada que no se deba y no veo problema en la información. Si puedes explicar dónde está lo reviso.

Un saludo
Pipeton (2026-03-27 13:20:18+00:00): Esta vía: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1493359970/history es un duplicado de esta: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/210056021

Y esta parte también se ha duplicado:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15682162/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20380208/history

Esta parte no la has borrado (creía que sí) pero la has dejado fuera del outline, incorrectamente.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1482978681

Esta parte era más ancha antes, de acuerdo con la realidad (se puede ver en teselas antiguas): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1159629410

La posición del edificio, antes lo tenía alineado con las imágenes del PNOA.

No comprendo por qué volver a importar los datos del catastro cuando ya estaba dividido en partes.
kapazao (2026-03-30 07:11:45+00:00): Ya está corregido https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180614958

Normalmente si veo que un edificio está importado completamente no hago la importación así, pero en este supongo que faltaría algo o se vería distinto y por eso se hizo. Trato de tener cuidado con las sustituciones pero en este caso se pasaron algunas, puede pasar pero al final se detectan.

Aún después de esta importación se tendrán que revisar muchas otras cosas y también tenemos que esperar que se actualicen las imágenes por satélite porque es muy posible que haya que reajustar bastantes elementos, ya que con las imágenes actuales y la inclinación en algunos casos es complicado ajustar bien las bases de estos.

Cualquier cosa que veas me comentas sin problema.

Un saludo
NeisBot (2026-03-27 08:33:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 9 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/463878268 v2 | 5 crossings
https://osm.org/way/464884983 v2 | 4 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/9367135726 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180490256
tux67 (2026-07-01 15:12:24+00:00): Nur zur Info - es fehlte die Anpassung der Adressen der anliegenden Gebäude: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184918612
NeisBot (2026-03-27 08:42:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13684121599 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Software House"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-04-04 10:33:09+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/180491588
Langlaeufer (2026-04-24 09:32:53+00:00): Hi Melancholy,
thanks for adding information to OSM, but do you realy expect cycleway, sidewalk or lit at agricultural tracks? ("Feldwege")
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180490697
Melancholy🏳️‍⚧️ (2026-04-24 10:36:56+00:00): Nein??? StreetComplete hat mir die Option gegeben diese Infos einzufügen also habe ich das getan.
Wusste nicht, dass das ein Verbrechen ist :/
Langlaeufer (2026-04-24 11:01:10+00:00): Ist kein verbreche und sollte kein gemeckere sein.. Wollte nur vorsichtig drauf aufmerksam machen das nicht alles was SC anbietet auch sinnvoll ist zu erfassen. Manches ist einfach  überflüdssig. Also ruhig mal hinterfragen was SC da so tut 

Ich vermute mal SC hat hier nicht explizit gefragt sondern du hast die Overlays genutzt?

Grüße Langläufer
Ltrlg (2026-04-03 18:50:02+00:00): Bonjour, êtes-vous sûr(e) de la position et/ou l’adresse de ce restaurant ? Dans la BAN, ce numéro correspond à way/99998074, à une quinzaine de mètres plus à l’est sur la même rue.
blaurent49 (2026-04-04 14:58:28+00:00): Bonjour,
Je n'avais pas touché à la position du restaurant mais vous avez tout à fait raison : elle était déjà erronée. 
Je suis passé ce matin vérifier : j'ai corrigé la position. Par ailleurs, le restaurant change de propriétaire et de nom.
J'ai noté d'autres erreurs sur les commerces aux alentours : la boucherie est mal placée. Le coiffeur sur la Levée du Roi René n'existe plus, remplacé par un agence immobilière. Je prendrai le temps de corriger tout cela. 
Merci de votre retour.
Ltrlg (2026-04-07 08:17:35+00:00): Merci !
Ahtojää (2026-04-03 21:05:49+00:00): Hei! Millä perusteella laskit tieluokkaa? Katu on alueellinen kokoojakatu ja viitoitettu reitti Vanhan Turuntien ja Pitkäjärventien välillä.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-17 01:33:21+00:00): Revert changesets with nonsensical tagging, promotional content and/or prohibited source=* (Google) in changeset 184204962

https://osm.org/changeset/184204962
ilias_ (2026-06-17 20:09:44+00:00): I just saw this, but please don't change names to English. If you want, you can add name:en, but this is in fact not the United States of America.
Herman Lee (2026-04-05 09:26:58+00:00): 您好，没有导流线和实际隔离的道路，请保持最简单的交叉形式，谢谢。不要做出其他的不明弧线道路。其次在编辑时应该最好在name中避免"（遥遥无期）"这种暧昧的表述，根据您表述的”遥遥无期“情况，将”在建“线路删除，因为类似于未开工、前期工程、规划中的道路不宜出现在此。
Trafford_Mapper (2026-03-30 12:46:49+00:00): Hi; Thanks for this edit, however 'building=hotel' is incorrect, Voyager is office space and not a hotel, so I've amended this to 'building=office'
TangledRockets (2026-04-02 05:54:15+00:00): No problem, I thought I had seen something to tell me it was a hotel. My mistake, thanks for the fix.
NeisBot (2026-03-27 09:18:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13684248427 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Fotoboxen Verleih"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-04-04 10:33:12+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/180492388
eggie (2026-03-27 09:33:40+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback   Er was al een adresnode. Daar heb ik de info mee samengevoegd.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
frissenm (2026-03-27 10:37:43+00:00): Check, ik ga eens lezen. Thanks!
NeisAgent (2026-03-27 12:18:09+00:00): 🕵 The changeset tags appear to reference Google as a data source.

Please note that using Google Maps, Google Street View, or similar Google services as a mapping source is not allowed in OpenStreetMap due to license restrictions.

More information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google

If the data in this changeset was derived from Google or another incompatible source, the edits may need to be reverted.

If this is a misunderstanding and the data was collected from permitted sources (e.g. local survey, Bing imagery, local knowledge, etc.), please clarify in a reply.
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-27 12:19:20+00:00): Sorry, this is a false positive report.

#HappyMapping
tom_maps (2026-03-27 12:22:45+00:00): Sorry, the source tag is a leftover from a previous unrelated edit (I used go maps app). Correct source is local knowledge
osmviborg (2026-03-27 10:54:47+00:00): Hej, Alt hvad der har med adresser at gøre, bliver i DK håndteret af en automatisk process, autoAWS. Undlad venligst at oprette/rette eller på anden måde modificere adresser, det gælder både på punkter og områder/bygninger. Dine adresseændringer er tilbageført. https://lgms.nl/p/osm/cached-wiki/?page=Da:Adresser
crassconcrete (2026-03-27 11:31:25+00:00): OK, det er bare helt i orden. Har du nogen ideer til hvordan jeg kan fikse routing-problemet?
osmviborg (2026-03-27 11:38:17+00:00): I OSM er der ikke noget der kan afhjælpe problemet, desværre 🙁
crassconcrete (2026-03-27 11:57:21+00:00): Hmm, en del af det der er footway nu er faktisk en indkørsel. Hvis jeg nu splitter footway op i 1) det der faktisk er footway fra hus til indkørsel, 2) det der egentlig er indkørsel fra footway-slut til Marienborg Alle, så vil slutningen af indkørsel formentlig være den vej der er tættest på 11A-punktet. Og det vil formentlig løse problemet, så vidt jeg kan se?
HellMap (2026-03-27 12:51:02+00:00): Sveiki,

Nosaukumus vajadzētu pievienot tikai, ja tie ir oficiāli vai vismaz labi zināmi. "Dūņezera piknikvieta" izklausās drīzāk pēc apraksta. Vai te ir kāda (jauna) zīme vai norāde ar nosaukumu?
muralito (2026-03-27 17:02:02+00:00): Hi. Seems that you mapped some landuse=forest as natural=wood. Please review.
Hidden Mountain (2026-03-27 17:18:49+00:00): Hi, but they are the same in rendering :) Also in osmwiki: "As a result nearly all data consumers treat both natural=wood and landuse=forest as synonymous tags for a wooded area."
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Forest
muralito (2026-03-27 19:31:47+00:00): :-) maybe we have to fix thar wiki page.

In the real world is not near the same Unfortunately, it is not the same to have hectares and hectares of invasive eucalyptus (even if they are intentionally planted) as it is to have native forests with their enormous biodiversity that also function as wildlife corridors for native fauna.

Please map each type of area as it should be.
Hidden Mountain (2026-03-28 06:52:14+00:00): "maybe we have to fix thar wiki page" - i think you are not the first one who whant to do it. Ok, I changed this tags. Good luck for rendering all other eucalyptus.
Kovirii (2026-04-30 04:20:06+00:00): The deleted roads/trails are in active use and lightly visible in multiple imageries, as well as on Strava.
InnaSumskaya (2026-04-30 10:49:18+00:00): Hello Kovirii, I’m sorry for any trouble caused by my edits! I relied primarily on the aerial imagery available in OSM, especially Esri World Imagery and the most recent San Juan County Orthoimagery (2025) for this area, where these service roads are completely invisible, which led me to believe they no longer existed.

However, I didn't check the Strava Heatmap. Since you confirmed they are in active use there, I agree they should stay on the map. I will revert this part of my changeset to restore them. Thanks for the heads-up! I appreciate you catching this.
Kovirii (2026-05-01 19:57:52+00:00): Thanks for your response Inna, they probably should have been labeled as trails. My guess is that they are used so motocross.
InnaSumskaya (2026-05-05 11:33:21+00:00): Hello, Kovirii! 

Thank you for your message and attention to detail. Unfortunately, due to a lack of confirmed data, we are unable to change the road class at this time. However, if you fully trust the source of your data, you can make the necessary adjustments yourself based on your sources. We would appreciate your contribution to updating the information.

Best ragards,
InnaSumskaya
aceman444 (2026-06-16 19:25:12+00:00): Obcasnost sa vyjadruje znackou intermittent=yes, nie water_characteristic=intermittent.
Nevymyslajte si vlastne kombinacie, sledujte popisy znaciek na https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/ . Dakujem.
confusedbuffalo (2026-04-02 17:11:39+00:00): This has been reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180779034
tomhukins (2026-04-09 13:45:07+00:00): As ever, thank you for improving the map.  I think the car park you added at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1493376196 might be a customer car park for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/595172895 - it's currently just tagged as "amenity=parking".
confusedbuffalo (2026-04-02 17:06:45+00:00): I have reverted this vandalism in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180778763
confusedbuffalo (2026-04-02 17:11:41+00:00): This has been reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180779034
melbournefan (2026-04-07 11:07:48+00:00): These are still active crossovers
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180493916
LachlanTansey2009 (2026-04-08 05:47:47+00:00): They have not been tagged as disused?
melbournefan (2026-04-15 05:33:05+00:00): They're not spurs either, they're still crossovers.
RaphaelPasloin (2026-03-27 11:02:15+00:00): Hello,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/198077805/ est avec cycleway:right 	lane et je ne vois pas d'interdiction ici : https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1233045718523328 est-ce que la situation à changée ? 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/198077804 c'est correct mais ajouté bicycle=no est redondant, par défaut en Belgique trunk=bicycle=no : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Belgium

J'ai pas vérifié les autres, mais 135300821 a aussi le tag cycleway il vérifier avec Mapillary ou Panoramax si c'est correct.

D'avance meci.
Raphael
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-03-27 10:11:44+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 169821873, 169822957, 169824493, 169824527, 169831616, 169832049, 169832398, 169862381, 169863025, 169864099, 169875582, 169890097, 169893771, 169903483, 169949761, 170357688, 170358829, 170373954, 170376968, 170401134, 170430012, 170520577, 170626399, 170761454, 170849173, 171065218, 171065567, 171065613, 171070338, 171170635, 171585544.
iandees (2026-03-27 14:55:35+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1944611069 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180506896, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
MihaelIvanjek (2026-03-27 10:43:44+00:00): Measurement units that were accidentally omitted have since been added in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180495661 #OptimoRoute
iandees (2026-03-27 14:55:41+00:00): Hello! I noticed that nodes https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5710015169, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5917414338 were moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180506901, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
eggie (2026-03-27 10:36:15+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback.. De info heb ik samengevoegd met de al bestaande adresnode
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
iandees (2026-03-27 14:55:49+00:00): Hello! I noticed that nodes https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5755424230, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8844552670 were moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180506907, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
NeisBot (2026-03-27 10:39:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 14 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/813527499 v3 | 14 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/7599164052 v4

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180495388
iandees (2026-03-27 14:55:51+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7599164052 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180506915, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-03-27 10:37:03+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 179007367, 179012282, 179012534, 179062660, 179063046.
NeisBot (2026-03-27 10:51:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 10 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1055337025 v5 | 4 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1288996511 v4 | 5 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/4712386990 v7
https://osm.org/node/11802247378 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180495890
iandees (2026-03-27 14:55:59+00:00): Hello! I noticed that nodes https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4712386990, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8788430726 were moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180506928, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
NeisBot (2026-03-27 10:51:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13684416120 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Men Health Clinic"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-04 16:33:05+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180862973
(Delete spam tags. First version)