piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
kapazao (2023-12-11 19:05:08+00:00): Hola, ¿podrías explicar "Actualización Carretera" donde añades un parque que no parece serlo?
Veo una zona de olivos y una pista deportiva en el centro, junto a una zona que parece ser algo industrial. Por favor usa los elementos correctos para editar y explica correctamente los cambios.
Un saludo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145010199
seattlefyi (2023-12-13 04:32:47+00:00): Hi, thanks for the edits - looking at a few of them, please check if features are already mapped before adding another. (The Starbucks coffee shop and Jack in the Box in recent edits were already there as nodes.) Thanks again!
ljmaps (2023-12-12 14:59:03+00:00): hello, test 2
ljmaps (2023-12-14 20:49:44+00:00): hello, test 3
Filip009 (2023-12-15 11:16:26+00:00): Kedže reálne tam chodník nie je https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1230391672 tak by tam nemal byť ani v mape. Odporúčam vytvoriť reláciu namiesto pomenovávania chodníkov ako je napríklad tu https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13137758 (V tomto prípade by som dal do tejto relácie časť hlavnej cesty a jednotlivé stanovištia, a ten umelý chodník by som odstránil.
macdale (2023-12-15 12:13:11+00:00): Upravil som. Je to takto ok? Nic som tam nepokazil? Je to asi moja prva relacia:)
Filip009 (2023-12-15 11:36:25+00:00): Dobrý deň, to pri tom chodníku pribudla dopravná značka poukazujúca na to, že je to chodník? https://b2bpartnercdn.vshcdn.net/content/images/product/default/dopravna-znacka-cesticka-pre-chodcov_14755.jpg
arjunaraoc (2023-12-29 04:59:07+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).

Check my updated Changeset 145645678: fix errors in highway tag changes, as Barrier cannot be used on highways. You may have to delete the link highway, if it is no longer operational.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145011029
𒂼𒄄　 (2023-12-12 03:05:54+00:00): لايوجد سكة حديد هنا حاليا على ارض الواقع. لايوجد ربط سككي على الواقع، فقط مشروع تم النقاش به والموافقة المبدئية عليه حسب علمي.
Jens Klein (2023-12-19 15:55:46+00:00): Ich finde den Detailgrad ja cool, aber ist das wirklich so gewünscht bei OSM?
michaelg_at (2023-12-19 17:17:00+00:00): Rendert sowieso kein schwein https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/area%3Ahighway#projects
CurlingMan13 (2023-12-12 03:48:35+00:00): Please avoid deleting and readding features.  It is strongly encouraged to just edit the feature that exists.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145011276
jacularis (2023-12-11 19:12:16+00:00): forgot to add in this changeset, source: survey
silversurfer83 (2023-12-13 17:40:43+00:00): Moin :)

wenn du so viele Waldwege löchst wäre eine bessere Erklärung in meinen Augen schon angebracht. Insbesondere ist dann auch eine Quellenangabe nicht verkehrt. Danke :)

silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145011774
Schlumpfhasenbär (2023-12-13 18:01:13+00:00): Moin, ich war 2 Tage mit dem E-MTB in diesem Bereich, unter anderem wegen der neuen Windräder. Jede Menge Scheiß und Mist! Ich lösche nur, was ich auch wirklich beurteilen kann. Nur weil einer mit nem Trecker über eine Fläche gefahren ist, ist dort noch lange kein Weg. Im Gegenzug lege ich natürlich auch neue oder nicht erfasste Wege an. Vieles ist dem User Ratz41 zu verdanken, der vor langer Zeit von alten Karten großflächig Quatsch abgemalt hat.
silversurfer83 (2023-12-13 19:27:05+00:00): Alles klar. Ich weiß das ja :)
Geht mir auch um andere, die diese Änderung möglicherweise sehen. Wenn du nach wwnigstens sowas wie "nach begehung" oder so dran schreibst ist ja auch alles gut. Immer so, wie es auch tatsächlich war.

Weiter gute Fahrt und eine angenehme Adventszeit im Sauerland wünsche ich aus dem Waldecker Land
Muhmaker (2023-12-11 19:26:03+00:00): Geändert wurde Buslinie 61. Typo in Beschreibung
flohoff (2023-12-12 23:02:08+00:00): Danke - Die hab ich kaputt gemacht. Gut gemerkt.

Das war eine Maproulette challenge auf die ich über eine Community Forum beitrag gekommen bin wo es um kaputte Kreisverkehre ging (Mehrere ab/eingänge auf demselben node - dann geht das zählen nicht mehr)

Flo
Muhmaker (2023-12-13 07:32:26+00:00): Kein Problem. Ich habe mir die alte Geometrie auch nochmal mit einem alten Zeitstempel in Overpass angesehen. Das war ja tatsächlich ziemlich seltsam aufgebaut. Ich musste für die Bus-Routen an zwei Stellen zerschneiden. Durch unsere Edits passen die lanes-Werte auf den einzelnen Abschnitten jetzt teilweise nicht mehr. Das werde ich noch korrigieren. Ich habe auch noch merkwürdige turn-tags auf dem Ring gefunden die sich irgendwie falsch anfühlen. Eigentlich kenne ich nur turn:lanes=* als sinnvolle Verwendung und zweitens ist das slight_left für die innere Spur unnötig bis falsch mMn. Wie siehst du das? Einzelne Abschnitte müssten mMn lanes=1 bekommen. Dann tut sich vielleicht wieder etwas in deiner Routen-Überwachung. Ist der Willy-Brandt-Platz früher dort schon mal aufgefallen?
flohoff (2023-12-13 14:12:39+00:00): 
Ich habs nicht mehr genau vor Augen - Mehrspurige Kreisverkehre sind ja oft als "Spirale" angelegt ... d.h. man fährt innen ein und wenn man 360° rum ist ist man aussen. Mit jeder ausfahrt fällt mind. 1. Spur weg. Aber ich weiss es nicht mehr.

In der Routenüberwachung ist der gar nciht aufgefallen. TomTom hatte eine Maproulette Challenge für Kaputte Kreisverkehre und da hab ich schnell geguckt was so in OWL so ist/war.

Flo
gscholz (2023-12-12 12:05:29+00:00): Este changeset ha destruido la ruta de autobús "Trolebus Las Heras => Godoy Cruz":


https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=-68.84124&lat=-32.93875&zoom=17&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=ptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes


https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=145012291


https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3032054/history


¿Puedes arreglarlo, por favor?


Por cierto, tu comentario sobre el changeset parece un ataque generalizado que abarca todo tipo de errores, pero que poco tiene que ver con el cambio realizado aquí. Recomiendo un enfoque más diferenciado, como se sugiere aquí, para que otros usuarios puedan reconocer de qué se trata realmente el cambio específico:


https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Saludos cordiales
Guido
serock (2023-12-14 04:34:06+00:00): Hola gscholz, si, vi que unifico las vías de la "rotonda" para hacer la ruta de autobús y eso rompió con todas las restricciones de giro que en ellas había, lo único que hice fue reparar esos errores sin tener en cuanta la relación del autobús.
Ahora trato de arreglar la ruta de autobús así queda bien.
Si tiene alguna duda de como hacer rutas de autobús, puede hablar con el usuario AgusQui, que él conoce mucho del tema sobre transporte público o bien, aquí hay mas información, para saber como mapear bien las rutas del transporte público: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Argentina/Transporte_p%C3%BAblico
Saludos.
CurlingMan13 (2024-02-07 22:23:23+00:00): What is your source?  How did you verify they accept crypto payment?
jb54osm (2023-12-11 22:08:17+00:00): Dank voor je wijziging. Ik heb het type kantoor aangepast en de website toegevoegd.
Emilius123 (2023-12-11 20:00:06+00:00): Richtig reingefailt
AgusQui (2024-01-06 04:32:17+00:00): No hay ciclovia al costado del tunel, solo es una marca de precaucion en el asfalto
AgusQui (2024-01-06 04:38:39+00:00): Le agregué el tag correspondiente a la calle: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:cycleway%3Dshared_lane
CurlingMan13 (2023-12-13 07:00:06+00:00): Why did you map the fairway with a small string to simulate a hole?  A multi-polygon relation should be used.

I know I have gone over this with you before.  Rather than continuing to create the same mistake and continuing to get comments on your changeset, please try to avoid repeating mistakes.  If anything that I have previously said in a comment is unclear, please let me know.  We're not here to make it difficult, but this is a community who is always welcoming, we just want to make sure the edits are of high quality.  Continuing to submit changesets with the same error(s) is infuriating, especially when comments have been posted multiple times pointing out resources and other tools.

Please reach out via changeset comment if you have any questions or need additional guidance.  Thanks.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145013827
maraf24 (2024-01-13 23:23:56+00:00): Czy sprawdziłeś, czy takie nazwy występują w terenie?
Bo to, co sobie ktoś wpisał na wroclaw.pl nie wystarczy.
pavvv (2024-01-14 08:31:34+00:00): zmianę już zrevertowałem
maraf24 (2024-01-16 21:05:22+00:00): Owszem, ale podałeś inny powód revertu - brak konsekwencji z adresami.
Ja podałem kolejne 2 problemy z takimi edycjami, byś następnym razem wziął je też pod uwagę.
Himké (2023-12-13 16:49:06+00:00): Trunk 2 is not signed as "In" nor "Out". Route refs should not have a space after the separator ;
Dartmouthmapmaker (2023-12-14 00:56:57+00:00): It is signs on Upper Water Street are signed 2 Out
Dartmouthmapmaker (2023-12-14 00:59:50+00:00): Also there Route 2 signs on Barrington St after Upper Water
Himké (2023-12-14 15:47:07+00:00): Separate route relations have been created for wayfinding routes that are not officially part of the province’s network
silversurfer83 (2024-02-05 07:15:12+00:00): Greetings :)

just a little note on your changeset here:
When adding planned or proposed features it's good practice to also note your source so we all know what an OSM object is based on.

cheers
silversurfer83
Eith (2024-02-09 15:11:43+00:00): @silversurfer83
Hi, so here is the source: https://zdopravy.cz/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Koncepce-rozvoje-elektricke-trakce-2023.pdf

It's a document of the Czech ministry of transport for the horizon year 2030.
Frans S (2023-12-25 10:23:33+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 
However, not all buildings squared.
Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145014347
bergaufsee (2023-12-12 18:11:45+00:00): Das ist nicht korrekt, auch wenn man das ohne Weiteres nicht auf den Luftbildern erkennen kann, ist die Zufahrt über die entfernbaren Poller 10212878242 (in real mehrere) und 6412377122 nach wie vor möglich.
user_5359 (2023-12-13 07:42:49+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1230422634 (one of two objects). What ist the mena of the tag
ATTMODDT = 2022-12-15T00:00:00Z
CREDATE = 2022-12-15T00:00:00Z
GEOMODDT = 2022-12-15T00:00:00Z
MUNICIPALITY = Whitchurch-Stouffville
OBJECTID = 352153
STATUS = New
ShapeSTArea = 35.335565885000001
ShapeSTLength = 23.866797671564601
YEAR_COLLECTED = 2022
user_3107993 (2023-12-13 19:54:16+00:00): Fixed
OddBunsen (2023-12-11 23:01:01+00:00): please write more descriptive changesets.
rskedgell (2023-12-12 10:27:46+00:00): As this is presumably a privately owned access road to a retail park, access=customers might be a better fit on both the gates and the roads.
eggie (2023-12-11 22:06:17+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback Op een gebouwomtrek hoef je niet nogmaals het adres toe te voegen. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-12-11 22:12:04+00:00): O D samengevoegd met bestaande adresnode.
Duplikaat adres vast verwijderd van gebouwomtrek.
Groet
eggie
eggie (2023-12-11 22:20:09+00:00): freeshop  social_centre ? 
Dat is bv een Herenclub. Rotary..
Wellicht amenity=social_facility? 
social_facility=.... 

of shop= 

Zie wiki.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dsocial_centre

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:social_facility

shop= 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop

Gr eggie
VLD549 (2024-01-26 18:21:14+00:00): Hi, I understand your comment. However, shouldn't we apply the basic rules in Dutch language, which means capitalizing the first word?
Thank you.
bxl-forever_repair (2024-01-26 18:43:52+00:00): Hi VDL549/VDL548/VDL547 and all the copycats.

You are commenting on a changeset that clearly says it is reverting another changeset.

Maybe you could have started by having a look at discussion of the original changeset, and you will have found the discussion we had together about this capitalisation issue.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144577606

I spent time to add a link to the other changeset in the "source" tag of this one; next time I expect that you do some basic homework to understand the situation and the history before issuing comments.  You could alternatively have clicked on the node, and then on its website, that’s litteraly 2 clicks and you would see that they use this lower "de".  You may be interested to know that there are many family names in the Netherlands and Belgium starting with lowercase "de", "van", "van den" and some others; people who have such a name are extremely sensitive that their names are spelt correctly.
VLD549 (2024-03-12 09:30:30+00:00): Thank you for sharing more context. We will research more thoroughly in the future.
Shadya Othman (2023-12-11 21:54:16+00:00): i added some buildings
IMAN SELEMAN (2023-12-11 23:07:01+00:00): Thank you shadya
user_5359 (2023-12-13 07:46:09+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1230434659. What is the mean of the tag Bernhardweg = Oost?
Geim (2023-12-13 09:05:46+00:00): It's not on this way, could you point me to the correct way with this tag?
Geim (2023-12-13 09:10:02+00:00): Never mind, I found it and corrected it. Thanks!
CurlingMan13 (2023-12-12 03:29:48+00:00): Please do not overlap landcovers.  I have cleaned it up for this golf course.  I highly recommend you review common golf mapping pitfalls here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#:~:text=the%20building%20itself.-,Common%20mapping%20pitfalls,-Adding%20name%3D*
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145015929
Shadya Othman (2023-12-11 21:58:44+00:00): I added some buildings and secondary roads
Awoobis (2023-12-11 23:05:36+00:00): Tak to nie ma
DiogoBaptista98 (2024-09-04 14:44:38+00:00): onde fica este bebedouro? ja existia um mapeado ao lado, cumprimentos
IMAN SELEMAN (2023-12-11 22:03:12+00:00): i have added few buildings
emersonveenstra (2023-12-12 14:18:34+00:00): Reverted for vandalism in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145039877
Shuttle Taxi (2023-12-11 22:21:24+00:00): Shuttle Taxi
IMAN SELEMAN (2023-12-11 22:07:32+00:00): i added few unclassified roads
IMAN SELEMAN (2023-12-11 22:10:44+00:00): I added a path
MxxCon (2023-12-13 04:37:07+00:00): Hello.
Instead of converting from amenity=bar into store=vacant, it's more correct to convert it into disused:amenity=bar.
And instead of shop=deli becomes store=vacant, it should be disused:shop=deli.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145016364
Robin Zyx (2023-12-13 05:21:36+00:00): I think figured out what storefront you were referring to where I changed amenity=bar to store=vacant. That location has not been a bar for at least 15 years. It was a convenience store / deli for most of that time but is currently vacant.
MxxCon (2023-12-13 05:24:04+00:00): You can use https://osmcha.org/changesets/145016364 to look at this changeset. It actually shows the difference between previous and current tags/geometries.
Carto'Cité (2024-05-13 10:05:07+00:00): Bonjour.
Je reviens sur ton changement de la voie verte https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1060889981, que tu as passée de path en unclassified. Ça peut pas être du unclassified, qui est destiné aux véhicules. 
highway=path n'est pas réservé aux chemins étroits, il s'agit d'un chemin générique, le wiki précise notamment 
« A highway=path is not for use by four-wheeled (two-track) vehicles. Often the path is simply too narrow. Other times it is wide enough but such vehicles are prohibited ».
Je repasse en path, mais ok pour en discuter bien sûr.
Antoine.
IMAN SELEMAN (2023-12-11 22:21:21+00:00): i added some buildings and unclassified roads
wireguy (2023-12-11 22:47:14+00:00): Hi Choia.  "made changes" is not a great comment since this is a changeset.    "Updated the fields at Park Ridge High School" gives more information.  
The updates could be a bit better.   Each generic field does not need a name.  If the field had a proper name, like John Doe Field, then yes.  Also, the baseball field outline overlaps the parking lot and should not.   Thanks for updating the area, keep mapping!
lipuma (2023-12-12 14:04:36+00:00): Prachtig gedaan, mooi werk!
Dimacn (2023-12-12 13:55:30+00:00): Здравствуйте. Зачем вы изменили тегирование линии https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/694213646  Что это за линия деревьев? Или вы вандалите так?
user_5359 (2023-12-15 08:52:03+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You add four different writings of a new key
shiping container	(4 objects)
shipping container	(10 objects)
shipping Container	(8 objects)
shipping containers (1 object)
. We didn’t use a space inside of the key. Did you know https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dcontainer?
If you need help, you are welcome
IMAN SELEMAN (2023-12-11 22:26:03+00:00): i added a lot of buildings
IMAN SELEMAN (2023-12-11 22:29:08+00:00): i added an unclassified roads
MxxCon (2023-12-13 04:41:26+00:00): Hello.
dark_store=* doesn't seem to be a standard OSM tag. Instead, I think what you are looking for is https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Doutpost
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145016670
Scout Jens (2023-12-12 14:57:19+00:00): An der Stelle befindet es sich auf jeden Fall nicht. Aber dort in der Nähe soll es wohl sein.
george1201 (2023-12-12 15:05:13+00:00): Ich habe nur den Wikimedia-Link hinzugefügt. Über die Existenz kann ich nichts sagen, ich war nicht dort. Du sagtest ja, dass du nichts gesehen hast. Den Bilder nach kann man es eigentlich nicht übersehen. Dann muss es wohl doch weg sein, vielleicht jetzt ganz woanders?
Scout Jens (2023-12-13 06:52:27+00:00): Das sollte keine Kritik sein. Der Link ist eher hilfreich. Das Denkmal könnte südlich vor dem Tor stehen.
george1201 (2023-12-13 07:01:18+00:00): Ja, Südseite. So sagen es auch die Bilder.
literan (2023-12-12 16:58:19+00:00): what is ascent=subway?? there is no such tag

will revert this
VLD192 (2023-12-12 18:28:04+00:00): Hello literan,
Thanks for reaching out regarding changeset #145016805. My edits were made to close a gap in the multipolygon and the tag update was unintentional. Thank you for pointing this out and making the correction. Feel free to reach out if you have any other questions. 
VLD192
IMAN SELEMAN (2023-12-11 22:49:17+00:00): i have added an unclassified road
IMAN SELEMAN (2023-12-11 22:52:50+00:00): i added some buildings
muralito (2023-12-11 23:38:08+00:00): Hola. No estoy entendiendo el motivo. ¿Bajas de categoria una trunk a primary por su importancia?
AndresDuhour (2023-12-12 21:32:32+00:00): Hola, gracias por el comentario.  Revisamos la clasificación jerárquica de rutas, y comenzamos a tomar como criterio de importancia para las rutas trunk la comunicación de localidades de más de 100 mil habitantes. En este tramo la ruta, por su importancia, correspondía clasificarla como primary. Ese es el motivo.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-12-11 23:10:30+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/293215825

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
WieKo68 (2024-06-11 04:08:01+00:00): poprawiono
augil (2023-12-11 23:28:14+00:00): also changed a few villages to hamlets
archpdx (2023-12-12 00:04:15+00:00): FYI, Esri Clarity is almost a decade old (from 2014). I would only use it as a secondary reference in addition to a more up to date source such as Bing.
jtracey (2023-12-12 02:20:09+00:00): The name of that trail is "Closed"?
BCNorwich (2023-12-12 07:44:18+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The source you state looks to be, (at least in part), copyright material, UK MOD Crown Copyright 2023. Please be aware that unless you have express permission to use this material to add to the OSM database, it would be considered a copyright infringement. Please see towards the bottom of this page:- https://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright

In this regard, it might be best to revert this whole changeset, so that no infringement can be claimed against OSM. You can then add back the features you know of, that are not gleaned from copyright material.

Regards Bernard.
Jamie1234567489 (2023-12-12 11:21:28+00:00): Changeset has been reverted - thanks for pointing this out.
DaveF (2024-01-19 00:06:56+00:00): Hi
It's very rough looking. Are you sure it still used for cricket? Website appears unused.
MxxCon (2023-12-13 04:48:17+00:00): Hello.
If I'm not mistaken JOSM validator complains about natural=coastline being fully enclosed by water...Or I don't remember the exact message, but it didn't like it...
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145018283
VLD159 (2023-12-13 16:30:01+00:00): Hello MXXCon,

Thank you for taking a look at the changeset. Before uploading the edits I ran the JOSM validator to see if there were any errors or warnings. I didn’t encounter any issues on my end. May I ask what the JOSM Validator warning said on your end?

Best regards,
Anthony
MxxCon (2023-12-14 02:46:41+00:00): I'm trying to remember which validator complained about this🤔 That was the reason why I edited this and similar nearby features..
Maybe if not josm's then osmose or geofabrik's? I honestly don't remember.
VLD159 (2023-12-14 16:55:00+00:00): Hello MXXCon, 

We do not use either of those tools. We currently only use our internal tools for our QA process to catch these.

Best regards,
Anthony
fortera_au (2023-12-12 03:09:30+00:00): Hi there, is there any particular reason why you've split Main North Road near https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1230460423, there's only painted lanes there, which shouldn't result in the road being mapped as dual carriageway (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Dual_carriageway for reference).

Both Bing and ESRI aerial imagery don't show any physical separation, I've driven through here nearly weekly and never seen physical separation either, plus there's no need for that for routing to occur (as per your changeset comment).

Best way to represent the turning lane there would just be with turn:lanes tags. Don't need additional ways or the restriction relation, and it reflects ground truth then.
slice0 (2023-12-12 03:16:41+00:00): I have brought your comment to the attention of the DWG
slice0 (2023-12-12 03:38:28+00:00): also seems how the DWG will be reading this id like to point out that all the changeset messages that this user has made in my edits have never been correct. This user does no research before making changeset comments in my edits.
fortera_au (2023-12-12 03:40:47+00:00): I’m just going to quote myself: “I've driven through here nearly weekly”
slice0 (2023-12-12 09:17:34+00:00): yeah the part that you dont get is that I never split the roads