piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
felipeeugenio (2024-05-11 21:37:03+00:00): Hola. Muchas gracias por sus ediciones.

dos temas: 1) amenity=government no existe.
2) para los nombres de este tipo, dependiendo de como son conocidas las instituciones, usamos name= alt_name o short_name=

pero no se agrupan todos en uno solo.

saludos y gracias
md42 (2024-05-11 22:13:23+00:00): Gracias Felipe. Lo siento el error. Creo lo hice en algunos otros tambien
felipeeugenio (2024-05-11 21:40:32+00:00): Hola
building es para las estructuras

y landuse=government es un tag deprecado.

saludos
md42 (2024-05-11 22:11:26+00:00): Gracias, no sabia. Y Gracias por corrigir
felipeeugenio (2024-05-11 22:13:46+00:00): Vale, no hay problema. gracias por contestar y por la actitud.
md42 (2024-05-12 06:46:56+00:00): gracias por la bienvenida y mostrar como deberia ser! :)
NeisBot (2024-05-11 21:40:14+00:00): Hi Fortinei, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/node/11897386415

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-12 06:58:56+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151205416
LouisXIV (2024-08-22 00:12:11+00:00): Vraiment pas convaincu, le wiki indique vitesses relativement élevées, 2x2 voies et séparation centrale, il n'y a rien de tout ça ici.
StephaneP (2024-08-22 11:33:52+00:00): Ici c'est le tag motorroad=yes qui va être intéressant pour refléter l'effet du panneau C107.
highway=trunk nécessaire ni suffisant
StephaneP (2024-08-22 11:34:23+00:00): *n'est pas nécessaire ni suffisant
LouisXIV (2024-08-22 21:43:02+00:00): revert suite à la discutions sur le forum https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/votre-avis-sur-le-statut-dune-route-nationale/26415
citrula (2024-05-11 22:44:36+00:00): welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contributions!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151203048
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:20:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:11:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:14:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:11:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:14:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:21:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:21:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:20:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
RedTheCat (2024-05-12 05:15:33+00:00): I know it's only one edit and I've seen your series of edits, thank you for also helping with fixing the Fresno/Clovis area!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:19:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:10:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:20:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
NorthCrab_upload (2024-05-11 22:01:00+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11897434260

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NeisBot (2024-05-11 21:55:15+00:00): Hi alonsoaguado, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/272613202

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-12 07:00:50+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151211556
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:16:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
Filip009 (2024-05-14 16:25:05+00:00): Zdravím, nachádza sa tam dedikovaný cyklochodník, alebo sa jedná len o vyznačené pruhy na ceste?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway#Dedicated_cycle_lanes
Marc_ch (2024-08-03 21:58:12+00:00): Bonjour,
Qu'est-ce qui vous fait croire que le lieu dit La Sottière n'existe plus (l'usage des lieux-dit étant aussi fait par les personnes) et que le nom du village de Dompierre sur le terrain a changé en "Dompierre Fr" ?
J'ai l'impression que vous confondez osm et registre de l'état.
l’annotation "fr" après Dompierre n'est faite que pour distinguer avec l'autre Dompierre quand est au niveau hors canton. c'est une forme abréviée pour dire "Dompierre situé dans le canton de Fribourg", ce n'est pas un nom.
Quand on parle entre personne du canton de Fribourg de ce village, c'est Dompierre
Salutations,
Marc
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:19:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:19:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:11:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-12 13:18:29+00:00): Thank you for mapping. The mapping looks great and also the changeset comment. Happy Mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151204174
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:16:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
literan (2024-05-13 20:39:50+00:00): не надо рисовать давно снесенные здания
Loboda83 (2024-05-14 11:44:48+00:00): Здравствуйте. Спасибо за правку моей ошибки. Подскажите пожалуйста можно ли отрисовывать полигон по фундаменту будущего здания? Как я поняла тут были снесены склады, расчищена площадка для будущей застройки и заложено уже минимум 3 фундамента будущих зданий. Поэтому я и решила, что можно сделать отрисовку полигона по фундаменту. Простите, если была не права.
literan (2024-05-14 12:01:15+00:00): знаете, пожалуй, тут вы были правы. Я просто не ожидал такого высшего пилотажа от сотрудника Озон :)

по фундаменту рисовать, конечно, можно. Я восстановлю это здание.
Loboda83 (2024-05-17 10:19:02+00:00): Спасибо большое.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-05-11 22:30:41+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11897514262

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
su91 (2024-10-24 11:22:17+00:00): Czy jesteś pewny, że ta droga nie ma nazwy? Bo w serwisach typu e-mapa (np. GIS Białystok) widnieje jako Dębowa. Dodatkowo, na jej początku jest tablica z nazwą ulicy, a na niektórych domach oprócz numeru napisano Dębowa.

Druga sprawa, odcinek między Leśną a (może) Dębową, który aktualnie nosi nazwę Dębowa, wg powyższego GISu to Leśna...
NorthCrab_upload (2024-05-11 22:50:27+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11897593775
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11897593781

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eggie (2024-05-12 04:57:26+00:00): Welcome to OSM....

I see a lot of damage to the map. 
What is your intention? Please be careful with the map. 
Changing the position of poi's. 
 Adding a duplicated primary way Zeedijk on the of the pedestrian. Why? 
I will revert your edits.
Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2024-05-12 05:00:08+00:00): Reverted by changeset #151209236

Your edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=151205008

Greetz,
eggie
Marek-M (2024-05-12 20:02:31+00:00): Cześć, taki budynek stacji była prawidłowo oznaczony jako retail. Zmiana jego funkcji na building=yes nie jest prawidłowa:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/731725135

https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/731725135
bbqman (2024-05-11 22:53:40+00:00): source: local knowledge
citrula (2024-05-12 04:59:39+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have removed the name you set ("Home"). It's okay for objects to not have a name - in the real world, many don't.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151205727
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:13:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:11:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:21:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:22:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:16:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:15:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:22:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:20:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:19:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:16:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:16:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:16:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
Quick_Tutor_7710 (2024-05-12 00:40:16+00:00): Adição e correção de ref para MT-010. Também foram adicionados trechos a relação existente. Foi adicionado ref para pequenos trechos de outras MTs (estavam próximos a MT-010)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:20:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
GeeMaps! (2026-07-09 05:54:19+00:00): Hi. How's your memory? :-) Could you please have a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5128558 You added a walkway here. Is there one there, & if so, can bikes use it? Thanks!
NeisBot (2024-05-12 00:55:18+00:00): Hi ferog_v, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1282059495

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-12 07:38:58+00:00): Thanks for your mapped beach.
Looks good!

#HappyMapping
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:19:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:21:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:13:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:15:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:19:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
NoReRolls (2024-05-12 01:37:08+00:00): I don't know if you just don't live here or if you've never actually walked the trail, but there are sure as hell beaches. And lose gravel and sand. How about your fat ass gets out and walks around. Or get your eyes checked, you can even see it in the satellite view. Clown.
tuxayo (2024-05-12 01:11:11+00:00): Errata: source manquante pour l'ajout du "les hauts" au nom: Mapillary.

"Lotissement" a été gardé des données existantes en préfixe faute de ne pas avoir d'image assez loin dans l'entrée pour savoir si il y a d'autres panneaux ou un plan.

Et dans BANO il y a le préfixe.
akimapbuilder (2024-05-13 06:51:56+00:00): Hi! I had to revert your changeset since there is no building in sight.
nevw (2024-05-13 03:23:52+00:00): There is later Esri imagery to map this properly. The address is not listed the the name tag in osm
LucGommans (2024-05-12 01:22:53+00:00): Query used:
(node[highway=street_lamp]({{bbox}});
way[highway~"(unclassified|residential|primary|secondary|tertiary|[a-z]+_link|trunk|motorway|living_street)"][lit!=yes](around:35););
out geom;

Has false positives in terms of streets that branch off near where a street lamp was identified but that do not have street lamps mapped along them, so it needs quite a bit of manual checking
MxxCon (2024-05-14 01:42:28+00:00): I don't think this should be in the description tag. This should be tagged as an open street when that actually happens. But otherwise a link to a presentation about open streets is not a description of a street.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151206924
IraGersh (2024-05-14 12:33:17+00:00): It was really confusing and I didn't want to make a blanket statement that might be wrong.

its called an open street, but because there are hours, there are times the barricades are taken down and I couldn't find the hours.  I'll likely bring it up at an Open Streets call I'm present at on alternating Wednesdays.  Next one is tomorrow.
IraGersh (2024-05-14 12:34:32+00:00): There's also the issue of how much of Berry is open.  I felt the presentation could answer that better than I could at a single sitting.  There's potentially so much to map here.
bbovenzi (2024-05-15 20:01:46+00:00): From Broadway to North 12th Street, Berry is a shared open street that operates from 8am to 8pm every day of the year. During those times all road users can share the roadbed. In off-hours, two way cycling is still permitted.

Additionally, trucks longer than 25' are restricted from entering the street and there are loading zones on every cross street.
MxxCon (2024-05-16 04:21:18+00:00): Then it would be great if this information could be encoded as conditional access tags.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151206924
IraGersh (2024-05-16 17:44:48+00:00): I don't want to make any further mods until I get feedback on the open street relation idea because any conditional tags would apply to all the Berry street segments from N12th to Bway.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-05-12 02:00:25+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1282064016

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2024-05-12 02:10:24+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, zamień addr:place na addr:city. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1282064016

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Jarek 🚲 (2024-05-12 02:59:49+00:00): correction to changeset message: "on west side of the street", not east
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:16:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:16:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:17:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601