piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
santamariense (2026-07-27 18:34:52+00:00): Olá wlisss,

Notei que você elevou para tertiry a conexão a algumas vilas/povoados distantes da Sede. Está corretíssimo, segundo a regra de classificação viária [1].

Contudo, segundo a mesma regra, não está correto rebaixar a secondary que cruza por dentro da cidade. Isso gera uma descontinuidade. É necessário que o caminho principal que os veículos usam para atravessar a cidade também permaneça secondary para que a malha viária não tenha brechas.

Se tiver qualquer dúvida, pergunte.

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brazil/Classifica%C3%A7%C3%A3o_das_rodovias_do_Brasil

Bons mapeamentos,
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2026-05-26 18:59:07+00:00): Hi, maxima, selver, prisma, etc. are supermarkets. This is a specialized shop. Maybe 
shop=houseware
or 
shop=trade + trade=baking_equipment
Wildsharky (2026-04-23 05:19:21+00:00): Revert of 181596581
Wildsharky (2026-04-23 06:05:53+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:181656110
Wildsharky (2026-04-23 06:10:34+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:181698930
melbournefan (2026-04-22 11:23:15+00:00): Hi, as I've described before, crossovers are not to be changed to be tagged as branch lines, industrial or spurs.

If you have any questions feel free to consult before making changes
Frans S (2026-04-21 09:17:17+00:00): Hello. Thank you for mapping.

Did you read the instructions carefully?

The idea is to assign a tag to each building that describes its condition.
Undamaged. Damaged or destroyed.
The buildings have already been mapped in another project.

Best regards
jptolosa (2026-04-21 13:46:30+00:00): Hola, buenas, no es necesario agregar un segundo puente como sendero si ya está el del camino vehicular.
Saludos.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181606077
HurricaneGator (2026-04-27 14:14:17+00:00): Hello Xhenz. 

I noticed that you’ve been reclassifying trunk (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtrunk) and other lower classification ways to motorway (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmotorway). 

Some of them such as (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/229282369) and (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/320520498) don’t fit the definition of motorway which is defined as “generally resemble a controlled-access road and are free from intersection controls (such as traffic-signals, rotaries and roundabouts, and stop signs or stop markings)” and “have access roads only for servicing purposes, such as a limited number of driveways serving non-residential property, service roads to infrastructure, or rest-area roads or bays, which may be more typical in regional or rural settings.” 
We can see that while there are some controlled access ramps, there are connections to residential/industrial areas at grade and alongside the length of the motorway such as via (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/730333302) and (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/320515634). Looking at existing motorway classifications with ref=A1 from (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1308323479) to (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1218094435), we can see that they’re accessible only via controlled access and have higher maxspeed associated with motorways.

If you disagree I’d be more than happy to discusss with you. Thank you and happy mapping!
Ерике (2026-04-21 06:37:44+00:00): Принцип «On-the-ground» (на местности) в OpenStreetMap (OSM) — это фундаментальное правило картографирования, согласно которому на карту наносится только то, что существует реально и физически видимо на местности в настоящий момент. В настоящий момент таблички с названиями улиц и домов пока еще к нашему сожалению не на Государственном языке. Люди эту карту находясь здесь  по месту ходили и правили -  видит табличку - улица Юбилейная, Улица Ленина, - так и пишет в карту. вы сидите за 1000  километров - на основании каких данных вносите изменения?
Wildsharky (2026-04-23 06:07:46+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:181656250
willkmis (2026-04-21 12:32:17+00:00): Hi there, in this changeset you appear to have removed all the traffic controls (signals and stop signs) from the streets that intersect L St (e.g. Capitol, 1st St NE). If you are going to separate out the signals like this, which I find a little pointless but know isn't wrong per se, please make sure you replicate them in all directions.
snake21 (2026-04-25 00:11:28+00:00): Thank you for correcting that mistake
Fizzie-DWG (2026-05-06 02:54:21+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown Source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182274820
iandees (2026-04-21 03:59:04+00:00): Hello! I noticed that nodes https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12314179126, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4117271406 were moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181607744, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
Ale_Zena_IT (2026-04-21 08:57:25+00:00): Hello,
please STOP your import and check what you are importing.
In the last changesets you are importing only nodes, not the buildings' geometry
PlayzinhoAgro-imports (2026-04-21 10:02:49+00:00): Hi!
Thanks for the comment.
Due to OpenStreetMap server limitations, I can only make 10 requests with 10k nodes per hour. For this area, I need to make 43 requests, and 13 are still remaining, so it may take a while for the building geometries to appear fully. 
I hope you understand,
if you have any questions, I’m available.

Please check this chagset and you’ll see that once it’s finished, the buildings will appear
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181462091#map=15/-15.80836/-48.03448
PlayzinhoAgro-imports (2026-04-21 11:16:28+00:00): Please, check now with the import done
mueschel (2026-04-22 09:22:58+00:00): Hi,
you added the strange tag "addr:street_clean' thousands of times across the world. Please check and fix this. Also, please read and follow our Import Guidelines - there is no link to the mandatory documentation.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
Fizzie-DWG (2026-05-06 02:55:14+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown Source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182274835
FroschForscher (2026-04-29 16:01:26+00:00): Was deleting the bollard the intended action here? The changeset comment sounds different.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181608689
iandees (2026-04-21 12:47:42+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6862347294 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181626017, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
MooPoo7 (2026-04-21 13:32:25+00:00): Whoops, thank you for noticing and correcting the mistake!
felipeeugenio (2026-04-21 11:34:23+00:00): Hola. En OSM los caminos de los edificios son privados a partir del portón, entré el portón y la calle son púbicos.

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181608725
_zalle_ (2026-04-21 14:19:36+00:00): Danke!
eggie (2026-04-21 05:53:35+00:00): Dag Crote..
Alle begin is moeilijk. Je hebt nu ook het adres vereijderd.
Beter alleen de bedrijfsinfo verwijderen en de adresnode intact laten.
Mvg,
eggie
eggie (2026-04-21 07:12:23+00:00): Adres hersteld
Fizzie-DWG (2026-05-06 02:58:59+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown Source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182274902
andrewwka (2026-04-21 09:59:49+00:00): Добавлены отсутствующие здания #wbgeo
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-01 01:25:47+00:00): Fix social media tagging to use standard contact:* tags for changeset 183473342

https://osm.org/changeset/183473342
Wildsharky (2026-04-23 05:32:17+00:00):  Partially reverted in changeset id:181655338
Aragon08 (2026-04-23 06:22:41+00:00): Why did you revert it? I bought the property last year people are running through my mesdow. There is no such thing as a path between Güterweg Schnabl and Güterweg Nagl. Its meadow and part of the paddock of my horses! I will put fences in two weeks and theregor I wanted to sign it in openstreetmaps that people know there is no way through! Güterweg Schnabl and Güterweg Nagl are 100% private. Me and Mr Nagl own the land. There is also a sign "Prrivatweg" come and look at it please!!
Glassman (2026-04-22 17:15:29+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

This is a residential road, not a path. edit reverted
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181610556
Timothy Crosley (2026-04-22 19:01:55+00:00): Hi there, thanks for reviewing the edit.

I originally updated this to highway=path because leaving it tagged purely as highway=residential fundamentally misrepresents the intended and actual use of this corridor.

This is a designated SDOT Neighborhood Greenway. The reality on the ground is that human and bicycle traffic vastly outnumbers car traffic on this block. It functions primarily as a shared active-transportation path, not a standard car-centric road. Currently, because it is tagged as a basic residential street without traditional concrete sidewalks, pedestrian routing algorithms are penalizing it as a hostile environment. This effectively erases a major piece of Seattle's pedestrian infrastructure from the map.

I understand path might conflict with the limited resident vehicle access, but there must be a way to accurately map the ground truth here. What is the Seattle OSM community's preferred tagging schema to ensure this street is correctly recognized as a pedestrian/bike-priority shared space, rather than just a standard road?
Timothy Crosley (2026-04-22 19:06:09+00:00): Just to add official context to my previous comment, here is the SDOT engineering page for this specific corridor, which designates it as a Neighborhood Greenway built for active transportation: https://www.seattle.gov/transportation/greenways-program/northeast. I'm hoping we can find a tag combination that better reflects this documented reality
Glassman (2026-04-23 15:09:25+00:00): Thanks for the information. I think what you want is highway=living_street. SDOT's greenway doesn't exactly fit the wiki definition of a living street, but it's close, though not the same as implemented in Europe. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dliving_street
pwbriggs (2026-04-24 23:03:45+00:00): Maple leaf greenway turns on 12th ave though, correct? That's how I'm reading https://www.seattle.gov/transportation/greenways-program/northeast but I'm not familiar with the area
Rick Richards (2026-04-21 12:50:39+00:00): Thank you for the fix. Highly appreciated!
Swihail (2026-04-28 08:53:54+00:00): Hi Rick Richards, thank you for your appreciation.
Happy Mapping!!!
Lepidobatrachus (2026-04-21 10:57:41+00:00): По какой причине вы поменяли тип дороги? Тут обычная подъездная грунтовка к частному сектору, полевой она не является
iandees (2026-04-21 12:48:22+00:00): Hello! I noticed that nodes https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10764684019, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/311648023 were moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181626064, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
FajrAl (2026-04-22 11:39:27+00:00): sertakan sumber
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-01 01:33:55+00:00): Removed nonsensical SEO spam tags from POI and correctly tagged as a lawyer rather than a supermarket in changeset 183473460

https://osm.org/changeset/183473460
ika-chan! (2026-04-21 17:46:56+00:00): Helli, private roads should be tagged with access=private, instead of deleting the affected section. Please see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won't_delete_roads_on_private_property for more information.
ika-chan! (2026-04-21 17:47:24+00:00): Oops, I meant to say hello. I was in a hurry just now.
GreekMountains (2026-04-21 18:28:02+00:00): hi ,i originally mapped this dirt rd.i own several enduro motorcycles.on sunday i went to this section .this section does not exist at present because the "blockage" is mnot a barrier but olive tree branches about 4ft high!even  farmers cannot access it.the road may not even be private,this is Crete and farmers sometimes do what they want. You would have to go to the land registry to ask. I realise this is a complicated but that is the situation.
There are many other roads which are private access that I have put gates on on my changeset. This is different at the moment. This section of the road does not exist. It may be reimbursed one day
Tatfahren (2026-04-21 20:09:57+00:00): Wo hast du Karten zu den Drainagen gefunden? Soweit ich bisher mit Recherche herausgefunden habe, gab es in der DDR damals ein Meliorationskataster, wo Drainagen verzeichnet waren. Diese wurde jedoch zum ende der DDR gelöscht.

Im Luftbild sind die Leitungen jedoch teils deutlich erkennbar, es müsste nur mal ein Grundstücksbesitzer mit dem Spaten prüfen, ob das was wie Leitungen aussieht und von der Position Sinn ergibt wirklich solche Leitungen sind. Aber ich kann mir nicht erklären welcher Herkunft diese geraden Striche in Gefällerichtung sonst sein könnten.
Tatfahren (2026-04-21 20:15:59+00:00): Hier hab ich gerade eine Beschreibung der Vorgehensweise gefunden, in den fall halt über Luftbilder die mit Drohnen gemacht wurde : https://www.tll.de/www/daten/veranstaltungen/materialien/sonstiges/07_drohne_hehne_mario_drainagedetektion.pdf
oliverusler (2026-04-22 06:15:03+00:00): macht es in so einer Karte denn Sinn unterirdische Leitungen zu erfassen?
Ich war da mit dem Hund Spazieren und war irritiert das auf der Karte ein Kanal war und LIVE aber da kein Kanal ist. (unterirdisch)
Darum habe ich den Eintrag gelöscht.
Kovoschiz (2026-04-21 12:20:12+00:00): Please don't delete the parts tunneled/indoors. This breaks routing.
vectorial8192 (2026-04-22 05:02:03+00:00): Technically it breaks routing, but I have the suspicion that those (deleted in this changeset) paths should not be there in the first place. It is not necessary for pedestrians that want to go to Xiqu Centre to use those paths, there are obviously better options available.
Kovoschiz (2026-04-22 07:53:58+00:00): They may want to go to the basement. This is a possible option. It's sheltered, air-conditioned, and has escalators. In the future, it should be connecting entire WKCD.
Kovoschiz (2026-04-21 11:59:49+00:00): Please don't draw a `highway=` + `area=yes` /`area:highway=` slightly away when it's bounded from a `=kerb`
bxl-forever (2026-04-21 08:26:35+00:00): Hello,

Amone the various "things" and "stuff" you changed, whatever this is supposed to mean, you also edited this grass area in the Caribbean:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1456537797

This explains why the bounding box for your edit is now displayed across a large part of the world.

In the future, please make sure you upload your changes prior to moving the map to another part of the world. ;-)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Also, writing meaningful changeset descriptions is always appreciated.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Thanks.
burakonder (2026-04-26 22:39:31+00:00): Hello,

In Istanbul, Esri Satellite Imagery mostly has more up-to-date data. When editing in Istanbul, using Esri instead of Bing will contribute to more consistent data.

This road, as currently shown in Esri satellite imagery and 2026 mapillary imagery, no longer exists.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1501686471

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1363591499153644&focus=photo&lat=40.9191799&lng=29.2226844&z=17&x=0.0009765094732933632&y=0.44814978522967835&zoom=0
MajaMaravic (2026-04-27 11:24:16+00:00): Hello,
thank you for noticing this. Will fix it.

All the best.
iandees (2026-04-21 19:00:18+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1237688236 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181641832, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
ideology508 (2026-04-22 12:37:24+00:00): Hi! I've noticed it as soon as I saved, so I panicked a little. Thank you for solving my mistake!
empty_child (2026-04-22 12:18:45+00:00): Good afternoon
Crystal is an licensed bank under Central Bank of Georgia, that's why amenity=bank. Your changes will be partially reverted
Jakaka2222 (2026-04-21 09:02:49+00:00): Maar bus 407: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9936554 gaat weer over de in aanbouw weg Stationsklok: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/320743551.
Is dit de bedoeling?
Leo Slager (2026-04-21 09:12:37+00:00): Tja, je kunt je afvragen of het nog de moeite waard is om die route te wijzigen.
Vermoedelijk zal het geen weken meer duren voor die weg weer open gaat.
En dan kunnen alle wijzigingen weer ongedaan gemaakt worden.
pyrog (2026-07-19 12:06:27+00:00): Hi,
image and panoramax values are invalid.

Could you publish your picture to Panoramax please ?

Best regards,
Yves
eggie (2026-04-21 12:27:19+00:00): Dag Luxe Benen

Dit geeft nu een foutmelding, want er staan nu drie huisartsen waarvan eén op de gebouwomtrek.
eggie (2026-04-21 12:29:29+00:00): De info heb ik verplaatst naar de al bestaande adresnode.

MVG
eggie
LuxeBenen (2026-04-21 12:36:30+00:00): Wat voor een foutmelding zie je dan? En hoe regel ik dit? Er bestaan namelijk 2 huisartsen en 1 apotheek (alle 3 een andere naam) op hetzelfde adres. Voortaan dus 2 nodes maken, beide andere features (gegevens) maar hetzelfde adres?

Groet,
LuxeBenen
eggie (2026-04-21 12:42:08+00:00): De foutmelding gaf aan amenity binnen amenity.
Drta kwam omdat Dr Walvis op de gebouwomtrek zat en die andere huisartsen daar binnenin.
Nu zijn het gewoon twee aparte adresnodes.
CTRL-F5 voor het effect.
Groet,
eggie
eggie (2026-04-21 12:43:04+00:00): Voor die apotheek maakt je gewoon nog een adresnode zelf. Waarschijnlijk ook nr 1.
eggie (2026-04-21 12:43:53+00:00): En... Voor juiste rendering de adresnodes een eind uit elkaar zetten.
LuxeBenen (2026-04-21 12:46:14+00:00): Super, bedankt voor alle tips! Ik ga er mee aan de gang. 
Groet,
LuxeBenen
eggie (2026-04-21 12:50:53+00:00): Yep... laat je niet weerhouden. Iedereen was ooit beginner. Ik ook.
Mapse
aaronq227 (2026-04-27 14:12:50+00:00): Hi Allouche OBAME, 
I noticed you have been changing a large stretch of highway from primary to trunk and unclassified. The OSM Wiki for Gabon mentions that highways with RN should be tagged as highway=primary (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Gabon). The OSM Wiki also mentions that primary ways are for "major highway linking large towns” (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dprimary). Based on this would you be open to changing these ways back or providing any resources you used to make these classification changes? Thank you for your time and I look forward to hearing from you.
eggie (2026-04-21 09:44:02+00:00): Tip.. je kunt gewoon de landuse=grass of meadow laten staan en de landuse residential er overheen trekken. Dat is een transparant.
Mvg
eggie
Tomas Straupis (2026-04-21 10:35:15+00:00): Pakeitimas atšauktas. Čia vieša GIS duomenų duombazė, o ne laikinų persidengiančių maršrutų sistema :-)
kamilbogacki (2026-04-22 15:04:09+00:00): Budowa obiektu na terenie na rogu ulic Stary Rynek i 3 maja już oficjalnie ruszyła, czy to nadal plany? Bo teren oznaczony został jako plac budowy.
eggie (2026-04-21 10:49:05+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback   Denk niet dat het nu correct is. Ondanks verfstrepen op de weg worden geen aparte rijbanen ingeteken. Het aantal stroken zit al in de way met het aantal lanes=... 
De afslagbeperking Niet naar rechts klopt hier ook niet meer. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-04-21 12:16:34+00:00): reverted by changeset #181624603
A67-A67 (2026-04-22 18:13:26+00:00): It seems all EmmaTabojic's replies are in PMs instead of at this changeset. I'll explain why this change was incorrect here.

In this change lanes are mapped as separate ways. That's incorrect. Way represent carriageways. Lanes are mapped in tags on the way.

Rule of thumb for the difference between lanes and carriageways:
- Separated by paint = lane
- Physically separated by e.g. a barrier or verge = carriageway

In this case there is no physical separation. The lanes are separated by a solid line. This means the ways also shouldn't be separated in Openstreetmap.

The solid line is mapped by the tag change:lanes=yes|not_right|not_left|yes. 

The impossibility to use exit 3 from the left lanes is mapped by a turn restriction: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12079665 So an Openstreetmap-based navigation shouldn't give incorrect navigation instructions. 

I hope this explanation makes it clearer why your change was reverted.
Ltrlg (2026-04-21 15:54:23+00:00): Merci 🙏
eggie (2026-04-21 11:00:30+00:00): Dag LB,

In OSM Nederland taggen we bij op de adresnode. Dus niet op de gebouwomtrek.
Je hebt een verkeerslicht verplaatst. was dat wel de bedoeling?
MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-04-21 11:03:07+00:00): Info verplaatst naar adresnode.
LuxeBenen (2026-04-21 12:30:41+00:00): Stoplicht is verplaatst naar een beter punt vlak voor de stopstreep. En "gebouwen taggen we bij de adresnode.." Moet ik dan een nieuwe node maken met hetzelfde adres als de gebouwomtrek?
eggie (2026-04-21 12:40:36+00:00): Hier heb ik het al verbeterd.
Je hoeft eigenlijk nooit adressen aan te maken behalve als twee instanties een zelfde adres delen zoals bij die huisartsen. .
Dan maak je gewoon een extra adresnode zelf.
Je kunt dan de info aanvullen op de adresnode.
Gr eggie
ToniE (2026-04-21 10:10:58+00:00): Servus MaxPower089,

Willkommen bei OSM.

"DLAK Zufahrt" sehe ich hier nicht als offiziellen Namen der Feuerwehrzufahrt, das ist wohl eher eine Beschreibung ("was es ist, nicht wie es heißt")

Daher ist 'name' = 'DLAK Zufahrt' nicht korrekt, gemäß dem Mantra: "name is the name only".

BTW: was heißt "DLAK" eigentlich?
"vollautomatische Drehleiter (Korb)"? Dann gehört das definitiv nicht in 'name', eher nach 'description'.

Gruß
Toni
itineris (2026-05-08 11:15:49+00:00): Szia!

Sopron mellett már pontosított utakat húztál félre a Bing alapján. Ez nem jó.
Kérlek, legközelebb igazítsd az elcsúszást a FÖMIhez, mielőtt szerkesztesz!

Köszönöm:
Ákos
StC (2026-04-21 10:11:37+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre qui passe par là. Je m'occupe de la réparation.
StC (2026-04-21 10:12:42+00:00): Oups, il a aussi interrompu une route. Je vais voir si je sais réparer sans perdre l'intention initiale
StC (2026-04-21 10:15:19+00:00): Non, je ne vois pas. Il va falloir remettre la D10 en état, et je n'ai pas assez d'infos sur comment c'était avant le changeset.