piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-07 20:04:43+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12596600129 - is it selling only batteries? By name it seem to sell also invertors.

Is it selling also solar pannels?
ralley (2025-02-17 23:46:12+00:00): What do you mean by "The triangle is not valid" that you keep using in your changset descriptions?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162635294
paulbrunner (2025-02-18 07:16:12+00:00): Reverted it myself due to big bounding box and re-did the changes in separate changesets.
domiden (2025-02-17 21:20:47+00:00): Should be: “… 102 to 116 …”
pavvv (2025-02-18 06:50:16+00:00): Dzięki, ale drogę dla pieszych i rowerów bez fizycznej bariery rozdzielającej je mapujemy jedną linią z tagiem segregated=yes.
pavvv (2025-02-18 07:10:30+00:00): Czy ten obszar nadal powinien być w tym miejscu?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1326467296
Mapping_Maślice (2025-03-03 22:11:53+00:00): obszar został podzielony na: way/1326467296 i way/1364284674
NorthCrab_upload (2025-02-17 21:42:51+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3584120605
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/920886782

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
CoyKoi (2025-02-18 01:33:26+00:00): Hi ImThatLuca, Welcome to OpenStreetMap editing, thank you for your contribution.

Wentworth College was already mapped as an area at https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2713474

So you do not need to create a new point to represent it. In fact, creating the point is considered a duplication, you can read about it on the OSM wiki page here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162636377
BCNorwich (2025-02-19 08:39:42+00:00): Duplicated sections of highway removed.
BCNorwich (2025-02-20 07:41:24+00:00): Duplicated highway removed.
BCNorwich (2025-02-19 08:40:44+00:00): Fiction removed.
dbradley771 (2025-02-17 22:03:34+00:00): This was an attempt at interpreting this rule:

"Park Guidelines Prohibit: Riding bicycles ... in the park’s pedestrian right of way, which includes all interior walkways, paths and amenities unless otherwise denoted"

Link to rules: https://theriverfrontomaha.com/visit-the-riverfront/#rules-regulations:~:text=Riding%20bicycles%2C%20skateboards%2C%20rollerblades%2C%20or%20scooters%20in%20the%20park%E2%80%99s%20pedestrian%20right%20of%20way%2C%20which%20includes%20all%20interior%20walkways%2C%20paths%20and%20amenities%20unless%20otherwise%20denoted
eggie (2025-02-18 07:54:41+00:00): Dag CvK  Je vraagt feedback.
Het is correct zo.
MVG
eggie
CvK024 (2025-02-18 08:36:33+00:00): Top. Dank je Eggie.

Mvg, CvK
eggie (2025-02-18 07:56:45+00:00): Dag Zentbeer,

Zal operator, brand en wiki  Big Bazar nog kloppen?

MVG
eggie
Zentbeer (2025-02-18 08:37:15+00:00): Dag eggie,

Nee, die kloppen ook niet. Big Bazar is failliet gegaan en KIK is een nieuwe winkel. Ik had de wijziging uit de OSM-app gemaakt, daar had ik deze gegevens niet in gezien, vandaar de onvolledige wijziging. Zal er later nog even naar kijken.
eggie (2025-02-18 08:47:10+00:00): Hoi... Ik heb het nu net verwijderd
Gr eggie
Zentbeer (2025-02-18 09:09:50+00:00): Fijn, dank! Misschien nog een vraagje. In de winkel van de Zeeman (die weg is) zit nu een energiehuiskamer van de gemeente amersfoort (https://www.amersfoortduurzaam.nl/energiehuiskamer/default.aspx) - ik wilde die ook aanpassen, maar welk type zou ik daar moeten kiezen? (het is niet echt een winkel maar heeft bijv wel openingstijden (ma, wo, vr van 9.30-17.00)
eggie (2025-02-18 09:18:46+00:00): Ahh  Dat zijn van die lastige dingen..
Wellicht zit hier iets bij. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:office

office=energy_supplier ?

MVG
eggie
Piagno (2025-02-18 06:04:35+00:00): Danke vielmals für das hinzufügen des fehlenden Gebäude. Das nächste Mal gerne noch die Notiz dazu schliessen :)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4631463
user_5359 (2025-02-18 13:44:50+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on  http://www.osm.org/node/12596683288. Did you mean 
amenity=bank
name= State Bank of India
?
user_5359 (2025-02-18 13:45:42+00:00): Please describe the objects! Name only objects are useless!
mueschel (2025-02-18 19:53:20+00:00): I suggest to remove the ~ 100 objects that are not tagged correctly for now. Then you can more easily enter them again using the presets available in the editor. That's simpler than trying to edit them in place.
user_5359 (2025-02-19 12:47:24+00:00): Welcome to OSM (again)! I completely reverted your changeset. 

If you need support for a better way to map the objects, I recommend the wiki.osm.org or the local mapper community. But of course you can also ask directly.
watmildon (2025-02-18 03:26:24+00:00): Hysterical mascot. I have added it as an alias of Dog for the mascot map.
rempshaener (2025-02-18 17:25:12+00:00): Hallo,
magst du deine Anpassung erläutern?
Viele Grüße
watmildon (2025-02-18 00:55:12+00:00): Nice. I added Bays as a synonym for Horse into the style file so it should get a nice icon now.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-03-14 06:12:48+00:00): Reverted by DWG - use of unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163597022
MichS (2025-02-18 06:07:50+00:00): Hallo,

willkommen bei OSM.

Bitte Geschäfte u.ä. nicht unbedingt löchen sondern mit Präfix behandeln.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namespace

Es sei denn, der Ort wird bspw. in Wohnraum umgewandelt.

MFG
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-11 16:29:44+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/544342530/history has tracktype = unknown that was added in this edit
Maybe it would be fine to remove it and keep tracktype= empty? That is fine for missing value
warlekin (2025-12-24 05:41:28+00:00): I believe I added the tracktype on recommendation of one of the error engines throwing it as a recommendation to not be empty for the given highway/surface combination  (bit fuzzy, that was 10 months ago now).

These paths are kind of like what a farm might have between fields, but this is municipal space that is behind fence and not publicly accessible.  The area is really boggy and overgrown accept where the roads are.  Its difficult to say exactly what condition these are in from the few vantages we have, and the aerial.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-31 05:29:51+00:00): > I believe I added the tracktype on recommendation of one of the error engines throwing it as a recommendation to not be empty

if tool was complaining about empty value and not complaining about invalid value, then it was a quite silly QA tool and was giving a wrong advise
itineris (2026-02-03 12:42:43+00:00): Jelzem, hogy Nagyvenyimen megint sikerült széttúrnod a már pontosított (FÖMI-hez és Magyar Közúthoz igazított) főutat.
carlwalsh (2025-02-23 00:30:49+00:00): I think the tag access=private is wrong on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/35061931 and on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1360758037 (unless new No Trespassing signs were added in the last year?) 

I didn't see any signs restricting unless you walked all the way to CA 37 or the train tracks
Dylan Fryer (2025-02-23 19:09:26+00:00): The levee access trail was a misclick on my part so I will fix that but Deer Island Lane has a gate with a private property sign at that point on the road
carlwalsh (2025-03-05 05:22:28+00:00): Awesome, sounds good. Sounds like my knowledge was out-of-date!
Jordi MF_import (2025-02-17 23:41:03+00:00): Hello Macarlou,

Ar you sure that there is a love hotel named "Phil" in this place? (a love hotel is a hotel just for having sex with someone).
CurlingMan13 (2025-03-13 01:05:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted.  Here on OpenStreetMap, we use access tags to denote a road as private.  Deleting removes all data, and when someone sees a road, they will likely readd it without access tags, and they cycle starts over.  You can read more here:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Dprivate

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163550514
woodpeck_repair (2025-02-17 23:42:32+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 162630469, 162630960, 162631035, 162631391, 162631562, 162631901, 162632478, 162632822.
woodpeck_repair (2025-02-17 23:45:00+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 162629903, 162630469, 162630960, 162631035, 162631391, 162631562, 162631901, 162632150, 162632179, 162632210, 162632478, 162632822, 162633848.
nevw (2025-02-18 01:31:42+00:00): Hi, I have shifted the 108 from the name of your driveway to a separate address node near the house
eggie (2025-02-18 07:51:10+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
nevw (2025-02-18 01:48:25+00:00): Hi, there were a few things to change in your edits which I have done.
The residential street has been retagged with correct tags instead of a business name and address.
the address tags have instead been added to the construction area and on a new node near the front of the property.
The names you added to various things have been removed as we only add the "name" tag to things that do carry a nane like the residential roadway name "Forest Knoll Avenue".
Professional Drone Imagery Pty Ltd (2025-02-18 02:23:53+00:00): Thank you
SD Mapman (2025-02-18 03:43:07+00:00): Hello! Out of curiosity, what justification is there for tagging 406th and 185th as highway=track? That tag has generally been reserved for two-track roads (like that section of 184th just south).
Fizzie-DWG (2025-02-20 02:05:13+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17286
SD Mapman (2025-02-18 04:05:36+00:00): FYI I can get the rest of the "can't complete" ones in SD. Ran against most of them back in the day...

Also that open green field on the west side is the purple horse practice football field/discus area/only place to tie a tent to when it's windy, I added it back in
watmildon (2025-02-18 05:04:00+00:00): Oh goodness. Sorry I went overboard there!

LMK if you hit any fun things that need icons for the map. Happy to add some weird crop or animal lol.
Vas111 (2025-02-18 21:20:14+00:00): Hello, thank you for contributing. Please note that the name tag is for objects that are explicitly named - please do not add names like "water tap". In the case of the bike shop just "beCyCle" is enough, no need for descriptors in the name tag.
HighStronaught (2025-02-18 22:00:20+00:00): Thanks for the info, I'm still learning how to use open street maps. Is there a somewhere to add notes about a place as knowing that becycle is not a regular bike shop is usefull information?
Vas111 (2025-02-19 10:59:45+00:00): We tend to use established tags to describe the point of interest in order for computers to be able to compile the information, but if you really want to you can add a 'description' tag for end users or a 'note' tag for other mappers.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-02-18 09:20:11+00:00): Hej! Zobacz proszę https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian - " okolice Wołczyna " nie są specjalnie przydatne bo lokalizacje zmian są banalne do wyciągnięcia

lepiej podać jakiego rodzaju zmiany były i skąd (na podstawie zdjęć lotniczych? wizyty na miejscu?)
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-18 13:06:33+00:00): I guess something went wrong.
You created a node without tags?
vasony (2025-03-03 20:32:37+00:00): wiki szerint a MOL a régi neve...
watmildon (2025-02-26 04:21:34+00:00): I suspect the mascot of Elk Mountain Elementary is "Elk" or "Elks" and not "Mooses".
watmildon (2025-02-26 04:22:08+00:00): Or maybe it is Mooses and that would be hysterical.
kechan (2025-02-26 04:43:44+00:00): It really is the mooses
watmildon (2025-02-26 05:02:30+00:00): lmao. Incredible. 100/10.  I will add not:mascot=Elks.
NeisBot (2025-02-18 02:04:38+00:00): Hi Cristiano_Ribeiro, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 92% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 1 natural(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=162641733
Vik Thor (2025-02-18 02:14:41+00:00): Ajouter l'adresse de ma compagnie. Merci de partager en grand nombre
aol_austin (2025-02-28 14:03:39+00:00): 1567
evsmile_ (2025-02-18 02:10:10+00:00): ***aerial view
zorglubu (2025-06-30 16:51:55+00:00): Bonjour,

Vous avez ajouté en février une "cascade du trou de l'aiguille" en un lieu où il n'y a aucun ruisseau.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12597219148#map=19/45.399791/3.232026

Je n'ai trouvé cette cascade ni sur le cadastre ni sur géoportail. 
Si ce n'est pas une erreur, j'attire votre attention sur le fait qu'on ne doit mettre dans OSM que des noms qui sont des noms vérifiables.

Pourriez-vous préciser d'où vient ce nom ? Merci.
Cambrousse (2025-07-01 08:55:01+00:00): Bonjour,

Effectivement le ruisseau n'apparaît pas sur les cartes que j'ai pu consulter, il s'agit d'un petit ru qui doit probablement s'assécher aux saisons chaudes.
Pour avoir été sur place en février je vous garantit qu'un ruisseau coulait bien avec une chute d'au au niveau de la falaise (une ancienne coulée de lave de type basaltique), falaise non cartographiée également.
Concernant le nom en effet les seules sources sur lesquelles j'ai pu m'appuyer sont le nom qui lui est donné localement par les randonneurs et les habitants du coin. Il y a en effet à proximité de la cascade une ouverture dans la falaise qui est nommée (idem, non officiellement) "le trou de l'aiguille".
Si cela est problématique, vous êtes en droit de modifier ou supprimer.
zorglubu (2025-07-01 10:53:50+00:00): Je ne vais pas supprimer : l'explication est parfaitement claire. Merci.

Ce qui pourrait être bien afin d'éviter qu'un autre contributeur ne supprime la cascade, ce serait de dessiner le ruisseau avec "waterway=stream" + "intermittent=yes". Mais il faudrait sans doute y être après une grosse pluie ;-)

Je vais pour ma part ajouter le Ruisseau de la Gazelle qui est dans la base de données Carthage, et démarre à 1 km dans le NE. Mais les photos prises du ciel ne permettent pas vraiment de voir un écoulement venant de la cascade.

Bonne continuation sur OSM !
Cambrousse (2025-07-01 11:19:49+00:00): OK, je découvre depuis peu l'édition OSM donc j'essaye de faire ça au mieux (en m'appuyant sur la doc très instructive).
Il faudrait que je retourne sur place pour cartographier le ruisseau comme il se doit en effet mais plutôt en automne, je peux déjà en tracer une esquisse sans aller trop loin par crainte de devoir spéculer sur un emplacement trop approximatif.

En aval de la cascade il y a en effet un lit de ruisseau (qui était à sec lorsque j'y suis allé) qui continuerais peut-être sur le ruisseau de la Gazelle en effet. J'investiguerai lors de mon prochain déplacement et tenterai de faire un tracé GPS voire si tout concorde.

Au plaisir.
zorglubu (2025-07-01 11:30:15+00:00): N'hésitez pas à faire un tracé approximatif, en ajoutant sur le ruisseau l'attribut "fixme=tracé approximatif à vérifier sur place".
J'ai ajouté aussi sur la carte une zone humide dans l'ouest de la cascade, qui pourrait être le départ du ruisseau quand il pleut.
Cambrousse (2025-07-01 11:39:15+00:00): Effectivement la zone humide pourrait être une excellente candidate.
J'avais pensé à un défluent de la Volave qui se situe à l'ouest mais les contraintes du relief ne semblent pas aller en ce sens.
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-18 06:10:54+00:00): #seo #spam
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-18 06:11:19+00:00): #seo #spam
Glassman (2025-02-19 02:55:45+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162642545
bxl-forever (2025-02-18 14:03:34+00:00): Hello.

The station will only open on February 28, right?

Isn’t it slightly too early to tag it as an active station on the map?

Also, in your changeset, you applied the "railway=station" and "public_transport=station" to the main building but also to this unnamed building just beside: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1360807707

As a consequence, the map will show two MRT stations instead of one.

Would you mind if we revert this until the station opens at the end of this month?  Thanks.
dinastik (2025-02-19 02:35:36+00:00): Sorry about that. Please revert until the station opens. Thank you!
skquinn (2025-03-04 23:14:50+00:00): Hi,

Please note that this is still a toll road and the toll gantries are still there. highway=toll_gantry is handled in a completely different way than barrier=toll_booth and should not be deleted. I am in the process of restoring the data to its correct state.
Glassman (2025-02-19 02:56:39+00:00): #TIP: In OSM street names are spelled out - the reason is that software has a hard time unabbreviating
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162642739
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-18 13:08:10+00:00): I guess something went wrong.
Is this a data import?
woodpeck_repair (2025-02-18 14:42:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162664201 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed and buggy import in Guadalajara, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17264 et al
Zandu (2025-02-18 21:56:28+00:00): Not an import. Traced by hand from the USGS 3D imagery program. It is highly accurate. I have confirmed its accuracy with spot surveys.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162643266
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-18 13:05:47+00:00): I guess something went wrong.
You created a node without tags?
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-18 13:05:18+00:00): I guess something went wrong.
You created a node without tags?
s777n (2025-02-18 11:12:05+00:00): Здравствуйте. Вы нарисовали переулок поверх зданий. Пожалуйста не забывайте переключать слои чтобы найти более свежие спутниковы снимки и исправлять смещение спутниковых снимков и  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Использование_аэрофотоснимков#Смещение_снимков_в_редакторе

"Короткий переулок" а не "переулок Короткий" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Россия/Соглашение_об_именовании_дорог#Правила_написания_поясняющего_слова 

Исправлено
NeisBot (2025-02-18 04:36:02+00:00): Hi sarthak_iitbhu, thank you for your contribution to the OSM project.

Over your latest stretch of time, you've made at least 38 changesets with minimal or no meaningful comments.

To enhance collaboration, please consider using the comment field to describe your map changes. This helps others understand and follow your adjustments more easily. You can find guidance on good changeset comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 

Thanks!

I've also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-18 06:11:35+00:00): #seo #spam
Taya_S (2025-02-18 06:25:30+00:00): Reverted SEO vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162646474
woodpeck_repair (2025-02-18 14:01:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 162662644, 162662635, 162662638, 162662639, 162662647, 162662642, 162662633, 162662587, 162662631 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed and buggy import in Guadalajara, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17264 et al
watmildon (2025-02-22 02:28:02+00:00): Can you double check https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/32534633? Maybe it should be Lyons with mascot:iconography=Lions ?
bphennessy (2025-02-22 02:48:54+00:00): Fixed! Good catch
watmildon (2025-02-22 02:59:27+00:00): I have been going through all the values on taginfo to figure out what needs icons. An easy enough QA job!
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-02-18 04:51:54+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4470462
nevw (2025-02-19 21:06:20+00:00): Hi
The https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=152.94037&lat=-27.54332&zoom=19 multipolygon cannot have outer role parts that share sides.
(the semicircular part is sharing sides at the end of the main building)
Easiest fix is to delete the overlapping or shared sections.

You could also map using building:parts which calls for the entire perimeter tagged as building=* and all the individual parts tagged as building:part
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:part
nevw (2025-02-19 21:15:54+00:00): The semicircular part appears to have its roof line integrated into the rest of the building so having an outer encompassing the entire building with two inners would seem a good way to map it.
Interswd (2025-02-19 10:04:04+00:00): Tam kiedyś ktoś to poprawiał, bo tam są przewozy turystyczne na jakimś odcinku tej linii.
AdamPetlach (2025-02-19 12:35:57+00:00): Przywróciłem go do pierwotnego stanu
Interswd (2025-02-20 06:52:58+00:00): No tak chyba było dobrze, ja nie wiem dokładnie jak jest, ale spróbuję kiedyś w terenie to rozeznać.
Marych_ (2025-02-25 10:45:35+00:00): Add street name & house number to it - please!
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-18 07:33:58+00:00): Just a test?
s777n (2025-02-18 11:38:51+00:00): Здравствуйте. Ваша правка была удалена. Перисовал эти здания заново.
Вы обводите участок и добавляете теги здания. У вас получается огромное здание. Адрес стоит ставить на дом. Если дома нет то лучше ставить отдельной точкой которая находится на участке.
Не нужно добавлять номер дома в имя.
pitscheplatsch (2025-03-03 06:45:36+00:00): Same again? Please see https://osm.org/changeset/163143430
GOwin (2025-02-28 00:39:31+00:00): Hi there! I'm just wondering, is this an LGU initiative?
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-18 17:08:54+00:00): #seo #spam
mavl (2025-05-13 15:08:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
mavl (2025-05-13 15:05:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
mavl (2025-05-13 15:06:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
mavl (2025-05-13 15:04:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
mavl (2025-05-13 15:09:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].