piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Hugoren Martinako (2025-07-22 06:55:11+00:00): Buenas, me he fijado que estás uniendo en un solo elemento entidades de población con nombres muy parecidos, como Lloma Llarga I y II, Urbanización izquierda y derecha...
Cuando los elementos tienen una referencia del ine (ref:ine) son entidades diferenciadas (ESP, entidades singulares de población) por los ayuntamientos, los cuales a su vez informan al instituto estadístico regional (de haberlo), y acaba llegando al INE.

Por favor, no los unas cuando tengan códigos diferentes. Mientras que el INE no considere que son la misma entidad, y les asigne otro código... pueden pasar años.

En este mapa, ves las que todavía faltan de incorporar al mapa: https://osm-es.github.io/validador-ine/, y es fácil descubrir cuándo una se ha borrado, ya que vuelve a aparecer.

Un saludo
swaree (2025-07-22 11:00:56+00:00): Hola, disculpa el cambio, pensé que era otra separación artificial de cuando se importó el nomenclátor del IGN. Ahora mismo los restauro.
swaree (2025-07-22 11:02:49+00:00): Vi que ya los restauraste, gracias.
TinPetreković (2025-07-21 14:47:36+00:00): National network tags have been removed because they do not align with the official source.(https://hepgis-usdot.hub.arcgis.com/apps/usdot::national-network-conventional-combination-trucks-map/explore)
TinPetreković (2025-07-21 14:51:15+00:00): National network tags have been removed because they do not align with the official source.(https://hepgis-usdot.hub.arcgis.com/apps/usdot::national-network-conventional-combination-trucks-map/explore)
b-jazz (2025-07-23 17:54:34+00:00): RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/835073894

FYI, you added the fairway tag to the way mentioned above, but that was unnecessary (and wrong) since the combination of the fairway and green were already correctly tagged in the multipolygon relation. Please be careful when  tagging ways that belong to a relation. It's often the case that the relation defines the object, instead of the components. Thanks.
TinPetreković (2025-07-21 14:52:34+00:00): National network tags have been removed because they do not align with the official source.(https://hepgis-usdot.hub.arcgis.com/apps/usdot::national-network-conventional-combination-trucks-map/explore)
TinPetreković (2025-07-21 15:02:42+00:00): National network tags have been removed because they do not align with the official source.(https://hepgis-usdot.hub.arcgis.com/apps/usdot::national-network-conventional-combination-trucks-map/explore)
BikeForestExplorer (2025-07-27 11:58:08+00:00): а навіщо ви змінили landuse=residential на garden:type=residential
leisure=garden
Це село, не приватні сади
TinPetreković (2025-07-21 15:04:28+00:00): National network tags have been removed because they do not align with the official source.(https://hepgis-usdot.hub.arcgis.com/apps/usdot::national-network-conventional-combination-trucks-map/explore)
TinPetreković (2025-07-21 15:13:11+00:00): National network tags have been removed because they do not align with the official source.(https://hepgis-usdot.hub.arcgis.com/apps/usdot::national-network-conventional-combination-trucks-map/explore)
NieWnen (2025-07-22 23:27:07+00:00): To może nie zadziałać. Jeśli ulice są zamykane to dobrze jest dać to zwykłe `access=no`, a nie conditional.
Można dać ew. `opening_date` z tą datą.

`highway=platform` jako krawędź peronowa chyba nie została zamknięta :P 
I mała prośba o nie dodawanie do niej `public_transport=platform`, id to sugeruje, ale jest to zbędne, gdyż relacje trzymamy na węzłach w okolicach Warszawy.

Ogólnie relacje też wypadałoby poprawić
Grzebag (2025-07-23 06:52:52+00:00): Dzięki za podpowiedzi. Pierwszy raz oznaczam czasowe wyłączenie odcinka drogi z użytkowania i opierałem się na instrukcji z internetu. Odnośnie platformy przystankowej, to aktualnie jest też zamknięta i prawdopodobnie po przebudowie będzie trochę w innym miejscu (mój wniosek po przestudiowaniu dokumentacji projektowej, ale zobaczymy jak to będzie w realu). Relacji nie dotykam bo się na tym nie znam :)
NieWnen (2025-08-02 15:24:54+00:00): Poprawiłem tagowanie i naniosłem ogólnie nowe rondo w budowie. 

Relacja 714 nadal do poprawy, bo na pewno zmienili jej przebieg.


https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169868207
Grzebag (2025-08-08 06:14:59+00:00): Dzięki za pomoc. Zobaczę co uda mi się zrobić z relacją 714.
NieWnen (2025-08-08 17:16:14+00:00): Zapomniałem dopisać, że finalnie 714 też poprawiłem: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169868977
Grzebag (2025-08-09 11:08:23+00:00): Dzięki! Nad przebiegiem relacji komunikacji publicznej w OSM muszę przysiąść i się nauczyć jak to poprawnie robić.
TinPetreković (2025-07-21 15:20:47+00:00): National network tags have been removed because they do not align with the official source.(https://hepgis-usdot.hub.arcgis.com/apps/usdot::national-network-conventional-combination-trucks-map/explore)
vasony (2025-07-26 06:40:01+00:00): Szia!

Most már sokadszor írod vissza, melyik a Kisújbánya utca, mert a térképen ebben az írásmódban nem szerepel. Ha Kisújbánya egy településrész és nincs az utcának konkrét neve, akkor az addr:place mezőbe kell kerüljön, így biztosan hibás, hogy az add:place és addr:street is ki van töltve.
A padoknak nem szokott nevük lenni, ez rá van írva, vagy csak a hely padja?

Tamás
Leo Slager (2025-07-22 10:22:51+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
mewhenthe (2025-07-28 14:32:00+00:00): Hi! It seems you have accidentally deleted an important tag on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/176832712, so I went ahead and fixed the error.

I'd personally recommend reviewing what you're submitting before sending it off, especially on smaller changesets.
Leo Slager (2025-07-22 10:31:23+00:00): Hallo HePee,

Alle begin is moeilijk en je bedoelingen zijn goed.
Maar in de wiki vind je een enorme hoeveelheid regeltjes die we volgen.

Nooit beginnen met access=no.
Een renderer of router gaat die wegen niet meer gebruiken zodat niemand over die weg kan.

highway=path geeft default toegang voor fietsers en voetgangers, 
foot=yes hoeft er niet op, maar het kan ook geen kwaad.
motorvehicle=no kan er dus af.

En de naam van het pad is vast niet graspad, dus dat mag er ook af.
Het is eenomschrijving van de way, maar dat ligt ook al vast in surface=grass.

ik pas het even aan.
Veel plezier met verder mappen.
Leo
NorthCrab_upload (2025-07-21 15:51:32+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, zamień addr:place na addr:city. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13015724219

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
kamasytrix (2025-07-21 18:11:20+00:00): Добрий день, не потрібно писати name=Заброшенный дом(ще й російською), ви вже використали тег building=ruins
TinPetreković (2025-07-21 15:57:46+00:00): National network tags have been removed because they do not align with the official source.(https://hepgis-usdot.hub.arcgis.com/apps/usdot::national-network-conventional-combination-trucks-map/explore)
rempshaener (2025-07-21 17:17:28+00:00): Hallo,
in so einem Fall ist es sinnvoll, aus dem emergency=fire_hydrant ein disused:emergency=fire_hydrant zu machen und ein entsprechendes fixme=Liefert kein Wasser zu ergänzen. Typische Anwendungen "erkennen" dann das Objekt nicht mehr als Hydrant.
Ansonsten passiert schnell folgendes: wenn den jemand vor Ort sieht erfasst er/sie den Hydranten neu, weil man ihm das Problem nicht ansieht.
Viele Grüße
StC (2025-07-24 09:14:49+00:00): Bonjour,

est-ce que l'itinéraire de rando pédestre qui passe le long de la Lys passe ailleurs pendant les travaux, ou est-ce qu'il est vraiment interrompu ?
aurekosc (2025-07-24 10:37:53+00:00): bonjour,
L'itinéraire est interrompu ; cela nécessite de prendre une déviation par l'Avenue de l'Eau Belle + Rue des Fusillés + Quai de la Dérivation
StC (2025-08-24 19:18:46+00:00): Bonjour,

j'ai fait de mon mieux sur cette base, merci.
Filip009 (2025-07-22 14:21:21+00:00): Dobrý deň, podľa webovej stránky ordinácia funguje. Prečo ste ju vymazal?
ednzxt (2025-11-01 16:25:03+00:00): Владимир, тропы удалять не нужно, ломается навигация! Для описания состояния троп используйте дополнительные теги, например: trail_visibility
CurlingMan13 (2025-07-22 15:41:30+00:00): The fire station should still have its amenity=fire_station tag.

Building=* is not the same as amenity=*
Hypsometric (2025-07-22 19:59:05+00:00): Thanks for the heads up and thanks for fixing.
danieldegroot2 (2025-07-21 19:50:27+00:00): Hey kenda,

Check out StreetComplete 61.2
https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete/releases/tag/v61.2

There are now more quests available for toilets and showers, so you should also be able to check i.e. if the shower next to it still exists (at least, it should ask for it, it hasn't been updated in 9 years..)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4325019892
(of course many toilets and showers are usually permanent.)

Regards,

Daniel
synfarer (2026-05-18 19:08:56+00:00): Hi Binnette! I see you changed Lortholrenna from canoe=no to canoe=yes in this changeset. Did you survey the entire canal to make sure it was safe? When I was there two years ago the top part looked safe, but at the end there was a drop with uneven logs that would flip a canoe, dropping you headfirst into the rocks. If they've rebuilt the canal to make it safer that's fantastic, but if not then it's important that the canoe=no tagging remains so people don't go down it.
NeisBot (2025-07-21 17:15:50+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
pitscheplatsch (2025-07-23 07:26:06+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/169290564
CRCulver (2025-07-28 11:00:54+00:00): Why did you delete the stop=all tag from this node?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7228281822/history

This is an all-way stop at a complex intersection where, in order to avoid doubled stop signs, each direction of traffic gets its own highway=stop node with a direction= tag. However, it is still an all-way stop intersection, so stop=all is necessary on each node.
CRCulver (2025-07-28 11:05:33+00:00): Also, the footway=link tags you added in this changeset are IMO inappropriate: since ways on OSM are commonly traced from center-point to center-point, the footway=crossing can span the entire distance from the footway=sidewalk on one side of the road to the footway=sidewalk on the other.
akino_germany (2025-07-28 11:18:29+00:00): The stop=all removal was a mistake. Thank you for finding it.
You can use footway=crossing for the entire way but then you loose information about how long the crossing really is, especially with the rather wide sidewalks and streets in the US. But if that is the consensus here, then i am happy to adapt.
NeisBot (2025-07-21 17:16:34+00:00): Hi Mirko Lanfranchi, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 95% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 1 highway(s)
- 2 building(s)
- 1 natural(s)
- 1 landuse(')

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=169255295
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-07-21 17:49:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 169256789 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious and test edits.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18467
dadavid (2025-07-22 08:52:02+00:00): Hi, 
du hast hier [1] den Namen der DAV-Selbstversorgerhütte Winklmoosalm geändert. Bist du sicher, dass das so korrekt ist? Ich glaube was du meinst ist eher der Gebäudename, nicht der Name der Schutzhütte. 

Viele Grüße

David

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/158454020
moloko67 (2025-07-24 15:13:40+00:00): hallo David,
ich habe den Eigennamen gelöscht und die Bezeichnung jetzt unter "lokaler Name" eingegeben. Ich hoffe, das ist weniger verwirrend.
Beste Grüße
Frank
kre777 (2025-08-17 10:11:30+00:00): Hallo moloko67.

Die Alm-Namen eintragen ist eine gute Idee. Allerdings gibt es für historische Namen den Schlüssel:old_name. Der Unterwirtskaser (way/150946074) z.B. ist laut almen-datenbank zu einem Wohnkaser umgebaut. Darum anstatt "name:ehem. Unterwirtskaser" besser "old_name:Unterwirtskaser" (betrifft evtl. auch andere "ehem.-Namenseinträge" von dir). Die Almhütte Knappenkaser (way/150946078) hingegen wird aktuell u.a. touristisch genutzt (im Netz zu finden). Sie ist somit unter ihrem Namen auch heute noch bekannt. Deshalb besser das "ehem." entfernen und nur "name:Knappenkaser" belassen. Infos: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen
Gruß kre777
moloko67 (2025-08-18 17:07:31+00:00): hallo kre777,
vielen Dank, das werde ich dann entsprechend ändern.
Beste Grüße
Frank
moloko67 (2025-11-21 14:50:02+00:00): hallo kre777,

leider kam ich jetzt längere Zeit nicht mehr dazu, die Daten zu korrigieren. Nun habe ich gesehen, dass Du in der Zwischenzeit schon etwas korrigiert hast. Bevor ich alle Datensätze nochmal durchschaue - sind noh Korrekturen offen?

Beste Grüße
Frank
kre777 (2025-11-22 10:12:16+00:00): Hallo Frank.
Ups - da war ich wohl schneller. Im Bereich der Seewiese (Reit im Winkl) finden sich noch ein paar Gebäudenamen mit "ehem." Darüber sollte man nochmal nachdenken. Grüße kre777
AntMadeira (2025-07-21 19:31:56+00:00): Olá, staxhinho.
Sê bem-vindo ao OpenStreetMap.

Nesta edição que fizeste, o uso da etiqueta "ele", que corresponde à elevação não faz sentido num ponto de cidade (ou outro equivalente).
A elevação tem de ser um ponto fixo, uma estrutura, um pico de montanha, etc. e não uma área que tem várias altitudes em vários pontos.

Qualquer dúvida, estou ao dispor.

Cumprimentos,
António Madeira.
staxhinho (2025-07-23 15:23:09+00:00): Olá, não tinha noção disso, obrigado.
AntMadeira (2025-07-23 15:33:41+00:00): Não faz mal, o mapa tem milhares de elementos e todos têm as suas especificidades. Estamos todos a aprender constantemente.
Aconselho-te a entrar no canal do Telegram, que tem grande parte da comunidade OSM Portugal, onde poderás aprender mais, tirar dúvidas, etc.
https://t.me/OSMPortugal

Cumprimentos,
António.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-07-21 17:49:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 169256789 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious and test edits.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18467
user_22337345 (2025-08-04 04:20:38+00:00): 没毛病 支持
TrickyFoxy (2025-07-28 22:51:55+00:00): 👋 В правом меню редактора есть кнопка «Настройки фонового изображения». Выберите там спутниковые снимки ESRI — они свежее
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-07-21 17:49:47+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 169255295, 169255923.
yrtimiD (2025-07-21 21:35:44+00:00): Welcome and thank you for your contribution! 
Highway=pedestrian is more for wide foot-only roads like "midrehov", in this specific case highway=footway will be more appropriate
Glassman (2025-07-23 23:45:55+00:00): #TIP: driveways are always considered as private so the access=private is not needed with the exception when the driveway is posted as no tresspassing.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169257314
bxl-forever (2025-07-21 19:06:36+00:00): OK, nice try.

A suggestion here: please avoid doing such work with the iD editor, because edits in iD cause major corruption to route relations.  I’ve just had to fix the cycle relation, where the ways on the bridge were added at the bottom of the list and without any direction role.  You can always ask for help or open a note to request complicated tasks.

Also, can you please check the following invalid turn relation: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19375922  The "via" node is missing.
Sikal (2025-07-23 12:03:20+00:00): Hi !

Thanks for your feedback. I hadn't realised that the order of the elements in a relation was important. Thank you for the correction.

Regarding the turn relation, it was a mistake and I will delete it.
user_23616104 (2025-12-15 20:17:21+00:00): This is correct but it is still not posted to the main it seems.
Langlaeufer (2025-07-22 19:14:00+00:00): hier ist noch kein Fußweg separat eingetragen.  sidewalk=right oder du müsstest den Fußweg noch einzeichnen.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169258265
osmmapper222 (2025-07-23 15:42:45+00:00): Hab den Fußweg ergänzt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169352058
fortera_au (2025-07-22 21:19:55+00:00): Hi, what's the source for this, is there any website or anything else to confirm this location? office=it also seems odd for a house, is this somewhere you can just drop into in person?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169258388
FroschForscher (2025-07-30 15:09:53+00:00): Hallo mafay,
kannst du dir das letzte Stück (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1416369427) nochmal anschauen. Die Linie ist nicht korrekt Verbunden und hat keine Eigenschaften.

FroschForscher
mafay (2025-07-30 15:20:32+00:00): Müsste jetzt passen, ist mit der Handyapp etwas schwierig manchmal… VG
NeisBot (2025-07-21 18:36:55+00:00): Hi FFSeis, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Added a new fire hydrant node with detailed tags including survey date, color, position, and technical specifications."

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish #AIgenerated
ion_chi (2025-07-22 16:27:34+00:00): "bicycle=Not Specified" is not a standard tag. For informal paths, it's probably best to leave the bicycle key unspecified
Leo Slager (2025-07-22 10:35:25+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-07-24 11:30:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 169393106 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some (perhaps unintential) changes by a new user that involved quite a lot of deletions in East Yorkshire.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18473
NorthCrab_upload (2025-07-21 19:12:44+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13016036398

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
TinPetreković (2025-07-22 10:00:11+00:00): Reverting after finding official National Park truck restrictions #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169284400
TinPetreković (2025-07-21 19:14:00+00:00): National network tags have been removed because they do not align with the official source.(https://hepgis-usdot.hub.arcgis.com/apps/usdot::national-network-conventional-combination-trucks-map/explore)
TinPetreković (2025-07-21 19:34:44+00:00): National network tags have been removed because they do not align with the official source.(https://hepgis-usdot.hub.arcgis.com/apps/usdot::national-network-conventional-combination-trucks-map/explore)
Dodko (2025-07-22 12:02:10+00:00): Prečo kreslíte budovy cez existujúce budovy a posúvate elektrické stožiare mimo základov?
Tomas_J (2025-07-22 18:27:02+00:00): Ahoj Dodko, mozem urobit revert? S uzivatelom som sa dohodol. Dik.
Dodko (2025-07-22 22:23:23+00:00): Už som to medzitým opravil..
NeisBot (2025-07-21 19:40:34+00:00): Hi Frankstein01, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 81% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 72 highway(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=169261285
pitscheplatsch (2025-07-23 07:29:44+00:00): 👍 Thank you for your private message and confirming that your deletions were intentional.
TinPetreković (2025-07-21 19:38:58+00:00): National network tags have been removed because they do not align with the official source.(https://hepgis-usdot.hub.arcgis.com/apps/usdot::national-network-conventional-combination-trucks-map/explore)
hsc666 (2025-07-21 20:14:31+00:00): Wenn Dort noch ein Betriebsrestaurant ist, brauchst Du den Node nicht zu löschen. Statt dessen wäre es wohl besser gewesen, einfach die neuen Eigenschaften einzutragen. In dem Fall z.B. amenity=canteen mit access=employees.
TinPetreković (2025-07-21 19:57:04+00:00): National network tags have been removed because they do not align with the official source.(https://hepgis-usdot.hub.arcgis.com/apps/usdot::national-network-conventional-combination-trucks-map/explore)
NeisBot (2025-07-21 19:57:39+00:00): Hi amanda-werle, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Added a new supermarket node with name asun"

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish #AIgenerated
b-jazz (2025-07-23 18:01:03+00:00): RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/677780399

When drawing golf course areas (such as greens, fairways, bunkers, tees, etc.), please be aware that the ways used to outline those areas can't cross over each other. Fairway outlines shouldn't cross over greens or bunkers or other fairways for example. If you could go back and clean up where you've made this mistake, that would be helpful. But more importantly, if you could stop from doing this in the future, it would be greatly appreciated. If you have any questions about golf course mapping, feel free to reach out.
TinPetreković (2025-07-21 19:56:55+00:00): National network tags have been removed because they do not align with the official source.(https://hepgis-usdot.hub.arcgis.com/apps/usdot::national-network-conventional-combination-trucks-map/explore)
Dodko (2025-07-22 12:05:34+00:00): aký malo zmysel ničiť cestu presúvať prechody a križovatky mimo reality?
Tomas_J (2025-07-22 18:27:52+00:00): Ahoj Dodko, mozem urobit revert? S uzivatelom som sa dohodol. Dik.
Dodko (2025-07-22 22:23:51+00:00): Už je opravené.
voltairovicz (2025-07-22 07:10:56+00:00): To Dino wyglada jak kurnik! ;)
syntex (2025-07-22 20:00:14+00:00): 😅
Geim (2025-07-26 07:29:58+00:00): Aangepast (revert)