piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
iandees (2026-04-06 12:45:00+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4525975909 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180944590, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
felipeeugenio (2026-04-06 11:53:59+00:00): Hola. Definitivamente los caminos interiores del puerto tienen alguna restricción de acceso. No es verosimil que sean de tránsito libre. Por favor darnos información de qué intenta hacer, de lo contrario será reversado.
gracias
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180940888
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-06 11:52:00+00:00): Hi femasi, welcome to OSM.

You created two somehow duplicate features here. Is it a test or went something wrong?

See https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1496994483 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1496994484

Best regards.
Dodko (2026-04-07 13:54:25+00:00): Prečo si vymazal bankomat
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4900510958/history
a potom novo vytvoril?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13713453314

adresa sa nekopíruje duplicitne na viac vchodov iba na jeden

názov pošty sa používa jednotný len názov pobočky bez slova Slovenská pošta pre celé Slovensko netreba ho meniť
Alex8581 (2026-04-08 16:01:16+00:00): lebo tam bol bankomat všeobecne ja som to zmenil na bankomat VUB ktorý tam je, a poštu som taktiež dal slovenskú poštu tak ako mi to ponúkla ponuka v OSM samo mi to aktualizovalo poštu na Slovenskú poštu aj s logom aj s názvom ja som tam len doplnil meno
Dodko (2026-04-08 18:33:12+00:00): Pozri si na video o mapovaní pre začiatočníkov https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q59kIyirKzM
NeisBot (2026-04-06 11:57:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13711112472 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Environmental consulting agency"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-14 16:33:09+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181331989
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
ieguy3 (2026-04-06 11:54:43+00:00): the powerlines on brigs say sce
Wildsharky (2026-04-08 04:05:05+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:180978087
Woazboat (2026-04-06 22:00:31+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180970432 for vandalism
Woazboat (2026-04-06 22:00:40+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180970432 for vandalism
Woazboat (2026-04-06 22:00:46+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180970432 for vandalism
Woazboat (2026-04-06 22:01:00+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180970432 for vandalism
Woazboat (2026-04-06 22:01:27+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180970432 for vandalism
Woazboat (2026-04-06 22:01:08+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180970432 for vandalism
ajmat (2026-04-07 06:14:24+00:00): Revert of 180938561
Woazboat (2026-04-06 22:01:17+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180970432 for vandalism
Woazboat (2026-04-06 22:01:35+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180970432 for vandalism
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-06 16:15:50+00:00): Hi Makahawani, welcome to OSM.

Is this a test, or is the added name a real one?

Best regards
makahawani (2026-04-06 16:40:44+00:00): it is the real name
Woazboat (2026-04-06 22:01:44+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180970432 for vandalism
Woazboat (2026-04-06 22:01:52+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180970432 for vandalism
AndyB_66 (2026-04-07 11:11:05+00:00): I pewnie się rozpocznie - ale dopiero wtedy należy nanieść zmiany. Póki co wycofuję.
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-06 16:15:28+00:00): Hi Makahawani, welcome to OSM.

Is this a test, or is the added name a real one?

Best regards
Svalbard (2026-04-19 09:56:37+00:00): Hallo puma515, ist ja noch nicht so lange her: Kannst Du Dich an die Schreibweise des Namens der Str. „Hermann Wulf Weg“ auf dem Schild erinnern? Da müsste eigentlich „Wulff“ (mit 2 ff) gestanden haben, oder? Gruß Svalbard
puma515 (2026-04-20 19:42:12+00:00): Hallo Svalbard, Habe das Schild da nur im vorbeifahren gelesen kann also sein das ich ein f übersehen habe. ich werde das schild sobald ich nächstes mal in die gegend komme nochmal genau überprüfen. 
Gruß puma515
puma515 (2026-04-22 19:31:15+00:00): Name nun angepasst. Ich hatte den Falsch geschrieben ist mit 2 ff korekt.
NeisBot (2026-04-06 12:39:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13711262314 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Law office"
---
على سبيل المثال ، يمكن أن تكون نسخة أكثر محايدة ومنصفة من نصك هي: "مكتب المحاماة"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-14 16:33:16+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181331991
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
شركة رواد القانون (2026-04-25 08:04:32+00:00): done
VLD0251 (2026-04-07 12:17:54+00:00): You have made over 5,000 edits without providing any edit summaries or sources!
 قمت بإجراء أكثر من 5000 تعديل دون تقديم أي تعليق أو مصدر
Kovoschiz (2026-04-06 16:34:26+00:00): 1. There's a question with ` name= ` vs ` board:title=` (vs ` inscription= ` ). 
2. For these `inscription=` type text similar to `description=` , it's too long to be bilingual. Single language is preferable. (Coincidentally interacts with the `name=` question)
Kovoschiz (2026-04-06 16:57:07+00:00): 1. In that `name:en=Sha Tin` has some merits in the sense it would be called the Shatin sign
Kovoschiz (2026-04-06 16:59:22+00:00): 1. And `Welcome to City of the Olympic Equestrian Events Sha Tin` seems a longer text for `board:title:en=` / `inscription=`
kingkingHK (2026-04-07 05:53:44+00:00): 1. I do like `board:title=` or `inscription=` more, but seeing taginfo says 59% of `information=board` is tagged with `name=` and only 4.4% with `board:title=` and 1.5% with `inscription`, I decided to do `name=`. "Shatin sign" feels like a description; `name:en=Sha Tin` would be descriptive name imo.

2. "歡迎蒞臨奧運馬術之城沙田 Welcome to City of the Olympic Equestrian Events Sha Tin" is only 69 characters. I wouldn't consider that to be too long. E.g. some bus relations have hundreds of characters due to PTv2 descriptive names.
Kovoschiz (2026-04-07 11:14:56+00:00): `name=` averages 23char with 11char SD in UK, and US. The `*:en=` 56char is 3-sigma away.    
https://qlever.dev/osm-planet/48VJsd
https://qlever.dev/osm-planet/wDVfyj
The longest ones don't seem most suitable for `name=` 
https://qlever.dev/osm-planet/GSqEkO
https://qlever.dev/osm-planet/w4oOB0
kingkingHK (2026-04-07 11:41:52+00:00): Sure, which is why I said I prefer `board:title` or `inscription`, and only didn't do it due to taginfo statistics.

(Also, I didn't know about this QLever tool so I just didn't know about the statistics.)
Kovoschiz (2026-04-07 16:28:59+00:00): Thinking of it now, `board:title=` doesn't need to be considered, as it's not a title. `inscription=` is used for the whole content, and not usable for most boards containing a long main body of text. That explains the stats. This can be used here fine. `inscription=` is standard, so should be welcomed?
Kovoschiz (2026-04-07 18:22:12+00:00): Was using iD now, and remembered `name=` being a default field. This mostly contributes to its use. 
`=welcome_sign` : 635 `inscripition` vs 7579 `name=` 
Isn't very bad?
kingkingHK (2026-05-16 09:23:00+00:00): Changed to `inscription=` https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182732539
iandees (2026-04-06 13:39:42+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5431040001 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180947571, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
schmittlauch (2026-04-06 15:25:21+00:00): Thank you. While I am familiar with ID, this was my first changeset done with Vespucci on the go, and apparently I am still finding my way around there as some work flows are a bit tricky there.
Thangs for catching my fault. I'll check all other changes of that set as well.
felipeeugenio (2026-04-06 13:39:04+00:00): Hola. Por favor un poco mas de cariño para dibujar bosques. Definitivamente el que agregó no tiene esa forma.

gracias
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180945929
eggie (2026-04-06 13:55:06+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
NeisBot (2026-04-06 13:21:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13711326112 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Dental clinic"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-04-14 16:33:19+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/180958176
grzegorz75jan (2026-04-10 00:56:04+00:00): To raczej nie jako węzeł 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:sport=canoe
infeeeee (2026-04-06 15:15:51+00:00): Hello! Welcome to OpenStreetMap!

You duplicated some already mapped shops, fixed them here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180952950

Please compare the surroundings with the "shops" layer in StreetComplete, and try to figure out which shop is in which building from there. GPS can be unreliable in such dense urban areas.

Happy mapping!
lukabułka (2026-04-09 21:54:14+00:00): proszę nie dodawać nazw opisowych typu "ścieżka". Do osm dodajemy jedynie nazwy własne
grzegorz75jan (2026-04-10 00:52:23+00:00): Linia niepotrzebnie przypięta do węzłów budynku i to w dwóch miejscach.

To chodnik czy ścieżka. Dlaczego linia tego nie przebiega tak jak widać na zdjęciach lotniczych tylko w znacznej części leci po trawie pod drzewami.
Arflha (2026-07-29 08:33:30+00:00): Premier message sur ce sujet ignoré par le contributeur https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178960791

J'ai ajouté ces informations avec des sources, j'ai engagé la discussion restée sans réponse, ça commence tout doucement à ressembler à du vandalisme. Peux-tu s'il te plait arrêter ce comportement ou au choix motiver tes modifications ou à minima répondre aux objections.

Merci
gosgtan (2026-07-29 08:39:38+00:00): Bonjour,

Vos contributions ne sont pas conformes au règlement OSM et n'ont pas leur place ici. Il faut vous tourner plutôt vers OpenHistoricalMap. Je ne sais pas quoi vous dire de plus
Arflha (2026-07-29 08:49:50+00:00): Le mapping historique n'a pas sa place sur OpenStreetMap, comprends que tu n'as pas à cartographier un élément qui n'existe plus. Typiquement on ne va pas cartographier l'ancien tramway de Cambrai, sa place est comme tu le soulignes sur OHM. Ici le bâtiment existe donc il ne s'agit pas de mapping historique mais simplement de son nom de la même manière qu'une ancienne gare portera le nom "Ancienne gare ".

Pour résumer, ça n'existe plus = OHM, ça existe OSM.

Amicalement
JeroenHoek (2026-04-06 17:18:03+00:00): "Automatically generated summary"?
Davileci (2026-04-11 18:26:51+00:00): Según las ES:Directrices de etiquetado españolas#¿Qué otras propiedades podría dar al nodo?, estos casos se marcan con old_name:es. Sea como fuere, por favor no borrar ref:ine.
Jordi MF (2026-04-11 18:53:02+00:00): Gracias por el aviso. No me di cuenta que eliminé el ref:ine=*. Veo que lo hice incluso de la relación... Lo edité con el móvil y puede que no me fijase bien (pero me sorprende que en la relación me ocurriese lo mismo...).
Ya lo he solucionado. También he trasladado "alt_name:es" a "old_name:es".
VLD0251 (2026-04-07 12:17:40+00:00): You have made over 5,000 edits without providing any edit summaries or sources!
 قمت بإجراء أكثر من 5000 تعديل دون تقديم أي تعليق أو مصدر
NeisBot (2026-04-06 13:39:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13711368438 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Massage center"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-04-14 16:33:22+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/180948244
TrickyFoxy (2026-05-14 16:35:47+00:00): 👋 В правом меню редактора есть кнопка «Настройки фонового изображения». Выберите там спутниковые снимки ESRI — они свежее

Здания рисуется по фундаменту. Либо сначала по крыше, а потом контур сдвигается фундаменту. Не по всей площади, которую оно под наклон занимает на снимке.
NieWnen (2026-05-16 23:06:01+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1600123137

Cześć

highway=bus_stop nie powinien być na obszarze. Na węźle było w porządku.

Można dorysować oddzielne highway=platform żeby wyznaczyć krawędź peronową.

Tak jak np. tutaj: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1113138051
VLD0251 (2026-04-07 12:17:27+00:00): You have made over 5,000 edits without providing any edit summaries or sources!
 قمت بإجراء أكثر من 5000 تعديل دون تقديم أي تعليق أو مصدر
VLD0251 (2026-04-07 12:17:10+00:00): You have made over 5,000 edits without providing any edit summaries or sources!
 قمت بإجراء أكثر من 5000 تعديل دون تقديم أي تعليق أو مصدر
aceman444 (2026-06-22 17:05:18+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3688183599
The shop states it is closed since Jan 23 2026. So how could the opening hours be valid at 2026-04-06 when you surveyed it?
VLD0251 (2026-04-07 12:15:12+00:00): You have made over 5,000 edits without providing any edit summaries or sources!
 ! قمت بإجراء أكثر من 5000 تعديل دون تقديم أي تعليق أو مصدر
willkmis (2026-04-06 14:31:12+00:00): Hi there, thanks for updating all this data. I noticed in this changeset, and maybe in others, you've changed the heights from values typically around 10 to values about 3.25 times as large. Please note that in OSM, the default value for height is meters, not feet: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:height?uselang=en. So a height=31 value for a building implies it's 100 ft tall! Are you importing the values in feet?
M-NCPPC_Import (2026-04-06 15:44:33+00:00): Ah, yes. I am importing the values in feet. I can recalculate and post again with the corrected values. Thanks for pointing this out!
syme31 (2026-04-06 14:05:58+00:00): J'ai oublié d'indiquer ma source : "Vérifié sur le terrain"
maro21 (2026-04-06 19:00:53+00:00): Witaj na OSM.
Na początku sugerowałbym ukończyć samouczek w edytorze, zanim zaczniesz edytować.
W tej edycji dodałeś drogi przechodzące przez budynki.
Chciałbym też zapytać o źródło tej edycji.
AndyB_66 (2026-04-07 11:15:57+00:00): Budowa jeszcze się nie rozpoczęła - zmiany wycofuję.
TrickyFoxy (2026-04-08 13:39:01+00:00): :) Но в будущем постарайсь держать себя в руках
maro21 (2026-04-06 18:42:34+00:00): Czy ta zmiana była przedyskutowana?
OSMaper_xD (2026-04-07 14:10:32+00:00): Czy jest jakiś problem w tagowaniu tej drogi jak innych takich przykładów w Polsce (patrz: węzeł S1 w Oświęcimiu, węzeł A1 w Częstochowie). Po nastrojach na forum (Węzły Drogowe) widać, że jest więcej zwolenników tagowania takich dróg jako motorway=link, niż jako primary, secoundary itd.
OSMaper_xD (2026-04-07 14:12:42+00:00): Warto też dodać, że zmiany z motorway=link na inne kategorie są wykonywane głównie przez szalona_entropia przy okazjach takich jak otwarcia dróg i są one chwile potem revertowane. To pokazuje jaki nastrój panuje odnośnie takich dróg
maro21 (2026-04-26 20:29:17+00:00): Czy widzisz rozbieżność między pytaniem, które zadałem, a odpowiedzią którą otrzymałem?

Czemu zakładasz nowe konta na OSM, nie możesz edytować z poprzedniego?
user_16178067 i Temat-Droga to twoje poprzednie konta?

Każda zmiana kategorii drogi z lub na highway=primary bądź wyższą kategorię musi najpierw być przedyskutowana z polską społecznością OSM na forum.
Proszę zapoznaj się https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Znakowanie_dr%C3%B3g_w_Polsce

Ta droga była wielokrotnie zmienianiana: primary -> secondary -> primary -> secondary -> primary -> secondary -> primary -> secondary -> primary -> motorway_link. Ustalcie między sobą jedną wersję na forum, a potem zmieniajcie.
eggie (2026-04-06 15:34:42+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
randomneur (2026-04-06 16:13:54+00:00): Erreur dans le message de mon changeset : c'est à Lourmarin et non Lamanon.
rhhs (2026-04-07 15:25:54+00:00): From now on, I will delete any "business update" you add to the map if it contains errors. Maybe that will motivate you to deliver good work. Wrt. this addition: addresses should be in Bulgarian, and should not be added if placed in a building that already has the correct address.
seopinnacleagency (2026-04-07 15:52:43+00:00): What’s the big deal? We’ll just fix the error and that’s it. Why do you have to act like that? Did We kill someone?

It was done by a new colleague - we’ll fix the issue and move on. Threatening people over small errors doesn’t make sense.

If you want to help or give advice, that’s fine, but treating people like this over a mistake that can be fixed in seconds - what is that about?
seopinnacleagency (2026-04-07 16:11:59+00:00): Do you want to remove everyone who is using the platform and be here alone, or what? Is that what you are aiming for?

Communicate with people in an adequate way.
seopinnacleagency (2026-04-07 16:29:59+00:00): Why hasn’t this business been removed? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6453120010/history

The building under the pin has the address, and the listing also has the address. Are your rules applied only to certain businesses?
seopinnacleagency (2026-04-07 16:33:15+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6453120011/history Whats that? The two businesses next to the one you removed are with the same issue, but you picked and removed only ours? Explain why?
rhhs (2026-04-08 15:26:06+00:00): I'm getting fed up with spending time correcting your mistakes and you not learning from it. I am glad there is a company adding new businesses to the map, but it should be done in accordance with community-agreed standards so that the map's quality is guaranteed and doesn't depend on the habits of each mapper.
Why don't you spend some time reviewing your previous additions and the corrections and remarks I made on them and compile them into a checklist for all you staff, so that even new colleagues won't make the same mistakes that their other colleagues have made before? It would save us all some time, and I will be able to spend more time on adding businesses to the map myself and correcting mistakes by other mappers that were active much longer ago.
OlasMapy (2026-04-06 14:26:30+00:00): Rzeczywiście został zmapowany tylko obszar odgrodzony zamczysko - gdańska - aleja AK, nie wiem czemu obszar pokazywany jest taki duży
AndersAndersson (2026-04-06 21:40:56+00:00): Hej!

Kul att du förbättrar kartan!

Är detta ett vindskydd bör du ta bort wilderness_hut och istället lägga till shelter_type=lean_to.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shelter_type%3Dlean_to

Är det verkligen en eldstad på skoterleden 50 m norrut eller blev det något galet?
Wanderer2000 (2026-04-06 16:42:16+00:00): Je hebt in deze wijziging nummers 116 en 45 samengevoegd. Dat lijkt mij niet de bedoeling, dus ik heb ze weer uit elkaar gehaald.

groet Wanderer
E11497 (2026-04-06 16:58:36+00:00): Sorry, ik was me er niet van bewust.
E11497 (2026-04-06 17:11:25+00:00): Nummer 45 is ook zeer waarschijnlijk de deuren die het Kruitvat op 45a niet gebruikt. Er staan stellingen voor.
qugeb (2026-05-02 20:50:21+00:00): Hallo Yannik,

kann es sein, dass bei diesem Changeset möglicherweise ein größeres Gebiet geändert wurde, als beabsichtigt? Siehe dazu auch diese Fehlermeldung: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5276171
kuhni74 (2026-04-07 14:11:42+00:00): the peak names are not that easy - how do you prove that these are the only names?