piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
pittrichimica (2023-12-16 15:55:14+00:00): Desculpe-me se eu deveria ter excluído uma edição sua. Normalmente, tento preservar a história. Com base no esri, vi que o reservatório de Sinop precisava ser adaptado. Tentei manter o multipolígono intacto e deixei os trilhos que o cruzam, exceto onde parecia não fazer sentido. Você pode dizer qual edição estava errada, por exemplo, o número da via?
pittrichimica (2023-12-16 16:01:55+00:00): Tenho que acrescentar uma correção: Até recentemente, as imagens da Maxar eram as melhores disponíveis, e eu as usava para fazer ajustes. Não faço ideia do motivo, mas agora a maxar não está mais disponível. Lembro-me de que a maxar era ainda melhor que a esri. Poderia ser esse o problema?
DressyPear4 (2023-12-16 20:56:24+00:00): Já corrigido.
NorthCrab (2023-01-16 01:06:45+00:00): Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

https://i.imgur.com/FshQfZL.png
Usunąłem ten punkt ponieważ:
* jego lokalizacja jest dziwna
* podany adres znajduje się gdzie indziej
* nazwa wygląda na opisową i nie jest łatwo po niej zweryfikować istnienia tego punktu

Pozdrawiam!
Frans S (2023-01-16 11:17:56+00:00): Hello. We welcome you as a new mapper.
I review mapped task as a validator and have a comment on your mappings. 
Your mappings are rather precise, except you did not square each building with the Qkey
Please square each building after you have selected it.
Best regards and keep mapping
Harry Wood (2023-01-16 01:54:48+00:00): Oh well done mapping that new building https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3519756  "apparently editing is easier than I thought" :-D  Nice one!
Welcome to OpenStreetMap!
candle_light (2023-01-16 02:12:28+00:00): Thanks :D Turns out it's actually quite enjoyable.
Will add flat number ranges to the entrance tomorrow as well (need to check first).
I might also try mapping the other big building. It's somewhat part of the same development but I'm not certain of its address, so need to confirm first before adding that part.
Glassman (2023-01-18 23:57:13+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. Glad to see you changed it to a path in your next edit. One suggestion. The path shouldn't connect to the ridge. One is a natural feature the others is just a route to travel. From the looks of the imagery, the path continues south of the ridge line.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131316937
eggie (2023-01-16 07:29:09+00:00): Hoi.. je zou evt. Het 'hek'  ertussen als lijn kunnen intekenen met barrier=fence  ..
En wanneer het geen officieel pad is voeg je daar aan toe informal=yes path=desire..
Dat is voor olifantenpaadjes.
Groet
eggie
impiaaa (2023-01-17 01:35:15+00:00): "Privacy" isn't a valid reason to entirely remove verified objects from the map. In fact, emergency services have found OSM helpful specifically because it includes off-trail landmarks, paths, and houses that they can use for navigation. See here for more information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property Or the 2nd-to-last bullet point here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Limitations_on_mapping_private_information
pnorman_mechanical (2023-01-17 05:01:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 131361372 where the changeset comment is: Revert deletion of building that exists
Fizzie-DWG (2023-01-17 05:03:01+00:00): Hello BC Trail Guides. As has been said many times previously regarding this cabin - if it exists on the ground, then it gets mapped in OSM, with "private" tags as applicable. Please revert your deletion. Graeme Fitzpatrick, 
OSMF Data Working Group
BC Trail Guides (2023-01-17 05:12:48+00:00): I will be sure to let you know when an illegal campfire eventually burns down the cabin (we have already had one close call this winter).

There is a good reason why this structure and the dozens of other cabins in the area are kept off the maps: it only creates issues for the cabin stewards and the local land managers.
Frans S (2023-01-16 10:23:28+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
We welcome you as a new mapper.
A few remarks. 
Please be more accurate and square each building with the Q key.
Roads, mapped years ago, are not correct positioned. When you can, (not restricted by iDeditor )please adjust the routing so that they not cross buildings.
Best regards
Frans S (2023-01-16 10:34:02+00:00): Hello. We welcome you as a new mapper.
I reviewed your mappings and want to comment on it.
Please be more accurate when you map a building and square each building with the Q key when the building is still selected.
Correct issues where buildings cross roads. Her the roads are not correct positioned. Try to correct these.
I will correct the issues.
Best regards and keep mapping
balint36 (2023-02-27 18:49:07+00:00): Ezzel a módosítással Nagyoroszi állomáson károkat okoztál.

Van ez a pont: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7605476788
Ez egy váltónak a pontja volt, innen ágazott ki a líravágány. Te a váltót nyom nélkül eltüntetted, a líravágányt pedig helytelenül a VE jelzőhöz kötötted be.

Kérlek, legközelebb figyelmesebb legyél!
eggie (2023-01-16 08:10:10+00:00): Yoeri  name = Zit Plek (Hoort niet op de kaart od staat er een bordje Zit Plek.. dan mag het wel)  heb ik omgetagd naar description=
en de plek bij de boom zichtbaar gemaakt net als de skateboard. 
Gr eggie
JJIglesias (2023-01-16 04:02:52+00:00): Segun los datos del INE y del Minedu (escuela Mariscal Sucre de Pata Pata Chico)

Esa poblacion es Pata Pata Chico (115) y no Marcawi o Tarcawi
5m4u9 (2023-01-16 05:50:03+00:00): Hola, lo de Tarcawi me equivoqué, pero Marcawi viene de lo que reportó en las notas un user, muy probablemente alguien que está recorriendo el norte de potosí desde villazón.

En algunos lugares que ví no siempre la escuela es el nombre del pueblo.

Quizá está equivocado, y como vos dices es mejor ponemos ese nombre. Gracias por corregir.
JJIglesias (2023-01-16 06:29:23+00:00): Para todos los casos estoy colocando el name= (oficial del Ine) y el alt_name= (Usuario); usualmente confirmo las poblaciones (Ine) con los datos de Escuelas (Minedu) que estan en general bastante precisos, Y en algunos casos tambien utilizo las Cartas Geograficas de USA y del IGM si estan disponibles.

Para el caso solo hay registrado 1 Marcawi y esta en La Paz y hay 1 Marckawi (166) y 1 Marckavi (96) ambos en Potosi, pero ninguno en esta posicion.

Saludos
Frans S (2023-01-16 10:57:50+00:00): Hello. We welcome you as a new mapper. 
you did not take the easiest task to map.
A few remarks.
Please be more accurate when you map a building by following the rooflines. Restrict your mappings to the instructions, Just buildings. 
Try to solve the issues which are showed before you upload your mappings. 
Best regards and keep mapping
JJIglesias (2023-01-16 06:39:21+00:00): Slds. Alli estan las poblaciones de Chiu y de Chiu Chiu, ya corregidas/agregadas; aunque lo impresionante de la zona es una represa y su embalse que estan al borde de un desfiladero.
Gracias
JJ
5m4u9 (2023-01-17 01:37:49+00:00): interesante, es una represa para riego según noticias.

Lo malo es que ya no dejan pasar las aguas hacia uncia y el río reseco, como la pajcha, el maylanco y el río rocha todo seco porque aprovechan todo el agua sin dejar correr nada para el río. prioridades.
hrhino (2023-01-16 04:18:20+00:00): Yikes! Thank you for fixing that, mea maxima culpa :)
ezekielf (2023-01-16 17:38:23+00:00): No worries.  It's easy to accidentally drag things.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:22:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
psluk (2023-01-21 02:49:51+00:00): Why is "shop=deli" more appropriate than "shop=convenience" for AMPM? I read the documentation for "shop=deli" and I don't think it is correct here, as most products available at AMPM are available in most stores, with the difference that they are a little more expensive here. (I feel like they mostly focus on food, though other kinds of products are available, and the stores are not that big, so I'm not completely sure "shop=supermarket" is the best tag.)

(By the way, the correct spelling is "AMPM," not "AM PM.")
eggie (2023-01-16 07:42:07+00:00): Yoeri  Je bedoeling is natuurlijk goed, maar ik zie nog al wat schade.
Stop nu eens met het veranderen van de vorm van gebouwen. Je kunt niet een luchtfoto gebruiken om een gebouw na te tekenen. Dat is het beeld dat je op een schuin genomen foto ziet.
Daar staat het gebouw niet.
Ook niet schuiven met de kaart. Het geeft schade.
Ook geen adressen toevoegen aan de omtrek van gebouwen. Je krijgt alles dubbel in de data van OSM en dat geeft verwarring. 
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=131320668

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-01-16 07:44:39+00:00): Ik zal weer wat herstellen, maar volgende keer volgt gewoon een revert als je steeds aanwijzingen naast je neer legt. Het is niet anders. Ook geen name= gebruiken voor bv name=Aanbouw huis
Dat zijn beschrijvingen en dan gebruik je bv  description= aanbouw huis.
Groet eggie
Josef73 (2023-02-23 05:10:48+00:00): Hello, can you tell me if your gym is open on Saturday or Sunday?
surveyor54 (2023-01-16 10:02:23+00:00): Hi, ich mal wieder.
Landuse grass auf landuse residential geht nicht.
Das müsste man als "inner" im  Multipolygon residential einfügen.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11803198

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Relation:multipolygon

Dann, hat eine Grasfläche eine Adresse?

Als Hintergrund zum Einzeichnen neuer Gebäude sollte man 
den Geodaten-Hessen nehmen, da es viel genauer ist.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hessen/Geodaten_online

Gruß
surveyor54
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:19:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:27:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
Glassman (2023-01-18 23:59:09+00:00): Question - are these roads marked as private or just on private land? Only roads marked as private should have the access=private tag. Can you review your edit?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131321498
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:37:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
archpdx (2023-01-17 00:57:55+00:00): Hi,
I noticed that this changeset adds `alt_name=Verizon Wireless` and `name=Verizon` to all nodes that are a part of ways you've modified (ie https://osm.org/way/1041984927 and https://osm.org/node/9592320472)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131321598
MrKomodoDragon (2023-01-17 04:42:25+00:00): Hi, thanks for bringing this up to my attention. How should this be fixed?
pnorman (2023-01-17 06:59:27+00:00): It looks like you did select all in JOSM and applied a tag. Can you link to the mechanical edit discussion where you described what you were doing, so we can see where it went wrong?
pnorman_mechanical (2023-01-17 07:46:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 131364283 where the changeset comment is: Revert change that added shop tags to lots of untagged nodes
MrKomodoDragon (2023-01-17 16:41:04+00:00): I did do select all in JOSM and update the tags. How should I make sure that nodes that are part of ways don't get selected?
Mechnical edit discussion: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mechanical-edit-proposal-updating-verizon-wireless-stores-to-reflect-new-branding/7882
NorthCrab (2023-01-16 05:50:25+00:00): Jeśli używasz z addr:place (adresy bez nazwy ulicy) to nie używaj wtedy ani addr:city ani addr:street.

Dodatkowo, nie dodawaj proszę duplikatów informacji. https://i.imgur.com/Uu626qQ.png Jeśli wiesz że adres znajduje się na całym obszarze to złącz punkt do obszaru.

Punkt jest tam dlatego że pochodzi on z importu i osoba edytująca w miarę możliwości może taki punkt przyłączyć do odpowiedniego obrysu budynku (dokładnie ten przypadek).

Aby przyłączyć, wybierz oba obiekty i kliknij C albo wybierz opcje z menu kontekstowego.

Pozdrawiam!
NorthCrab (2023-01-16 05:52:43+00:00): "Jeśli używasz z addr:place (adresy bez nazwy ulicy) to nie używaj wtedy ani addr:city ani addr:street" - widzę że dokumentacja zezwala na addr:place i addr:city z takimi samymi wartościami, więc to jest okej.
Adam Franco (2023-11-27 16:48:00+00:00): I'd suggest that Montpelier should be a place=town rather than bumping Barre. I'd argue that only Burlington (and *maybe* Rutland) would qualify as place=city.
pitfire (2023-01-16 06:34:40+00:00): Hoi R_S,
gelieve de telefoon in (ITU-T E.164) formaat. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone
mavl (2023-04-25 09:07:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:49:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:22:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:29:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:15:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
Aleksey Gorelikov (2023-01-16 06:03:38+00:00): https://data-usdot.opendata.arcgis.com/maps/usdot::highway-performance-monitoring-system-fsys-3/explore?location=31.711589%2C-94.347433%2C17.07
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:41:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
Allison P (2023-01-16 10:55:40+00:00): This is a pipestem driveway, not a residential road.
radmouni (2023-01-23 05:33:21+00:00): Hello Allison ,Thank you for reviewing our change set and highlighting the issue. Apologies for the incorrect edits. We have made the necessary corrections in the change set 131591110. Thanks once again for the feedback provided, I'm looking forward to learn more from you. Regards, radmouni
Aleksey Gorelikov (2023-01-16 06:09:31+00:00): https://data-usdot.opendata.arcgis.com/maps/usdot::highway-performance-monitoring-system-fsys-3/explore?location=31.711713%2C-94.346660%2C18.25
Aleksey Gorelikov (2023-01-16 06:16:50+00:00): https://data-usdot.opendata.arcgis.com/maps/usdot::highway-performance-monitoring-system-fsys-3/explore?location=40.366063%2C-105.271479%2C15.65
itchybellybutton (2023-01-17 17:04:20+00:00): Hi SingletrailMap
i deleted your bikeshop because the store already existed on another place. I moved it to the current position.
Ride Trail Map (2023-01-17 17:14:53+00:00): Perfect.
julcnx (2024-04-24 09:00:09+00:00): Hey, thank you for your contributions! I noticed you've marked some roads as 'living_street.' One tip for future edits: you should tag these as 'highway=residential' instead. This is because there aren't any rules in Thailand that specifically lower speed limits or give pedestrians priority in residential areas.
You can read more about this on the Thailand wiki. If you have any questions, feel free to ask. Cheers
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Thailand#Urban_and_Local_Road_wide_enough_for_motor_cars
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131323282
tobych (2023-01-16 06:46:07+00:00): Sorry I didn't use the right comment on my changeset.
CurlingMan13 (2023-01-16 12:08:54+00:00): No worries!  It happens.  You can just add a comment like you did either correcting it or providing more details.

Welcome to OSM and keep up the good work.  Be sure to reach out if you have any questions!
olo81 (2023-01-18 00:18:59+00:00): Dlaczego nazwa została zmieniona? 
Według geoportalu była poprawna.
olo81 (2023-01-18 01:09:18+00:00): Poprawione, jeśli część drogi ma inną nazwę, trzeba ją przeciąć. Każdy z odcinków nazwać oddzielnie.
CurlingMan13 (2023-01-19 07:38:21+00:00): Looks correct.  Thanks for updating!  Feel free to contribute more and get involved!  If you have any questions, don't hesitate to reach out!

A really easy way to contribute is using an app called "StreetComplete".
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2023-01-19 04:16:34+00:00): Der er ingen grund til at sætte area=yes på medlemmer af en multipolygon.
Det er jo altid arealer.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-01-16 11:48:10+00:00): Did you happen to see the name of the sports centre?

I want to change it to Valdeku saun-spordihoone
https://www.tallinn.ee/et/nomme/valdeku-saun-spordihoone

But just in case I wanted to ask.
Zverik (2023-01-16 12:51:51+00:00): Yes, it's written with a dash on the side, so I think that's fine.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-05-05 14:18:52+00:00): zerkniesz na https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5279704 ?

to railway=proposed jest nadal na serio planowane? chyba nie i powinno być skasowane
dzamper (2026-05-05 14:37:40+00:00): Niestety nie mam pojęcia, ja tylko dostałem `proposed:railway=tram` na podstawie tego że już było dodane `railway=proposed` przez kogoś innego
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-05-05 15:04:38+00:00): no, tak wyglądało ale wolałem się zapytać wszystkich zaangażowanych zanim skasuję
syme31 (2023-02-26 13:27:18+00:00): J'ajoute la précision que la fermeture "temporaire" de ce pont devrait être vraiment longue : Normalement au moins 2 ans (14 mois de travaux prévus à partir de début 2024).
Ma source de renseignement est cet article : https://www.courrier-picard.fr/id378000/article/2023-01-12/partir-du-17-janvier-le-pont-suspendu-de-lacroix-saint-ouen-sera-ferme-la
marc__marc (2026-01-13 12:12:53+00:00): Hello,
Palm isn't a genus, it's a taxon/family
I have made the following change :
leaf_type=broadleaved
taxon=Arecaceae
taxon:wikidata=Q14080
taxon:en=Palm

Regards,
Marc
radiotrefoil (2026-01-13 12:16:51+00:00): Thanks, I'll keep that in mind next time I'm adding them. Cheers
marc__marc (2026-01-13 12:20:14+00:00): you're welcome
Rizki IRM-ED (2023-02-28 01:27:43+00:00): Hi cghisa_grab, thank you for contributing and improving the data in OSM.
But there is an issue on the highway https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1132399725 and the surrounding highway because it overlaps with a water body. After checking, it turns out that the area has turned into a reservoir. Since the highway was no longer visible in the latest image, I removed that highway segment and some of the highway segments around it.
If you have any other suggestions, please let me know.
(https://maproulette.org/challenge/30208/task/147047836)
Thank you.
cghisa_grab (2023-03-01 05:10:35+00:00): Hi, thanks a lot for correcting the data!
IlBano (2023-01-22 13:59:24+00:00): Ciao le_bistrot.
Lo svincolo della SR71 che hai modificato è effettivamente stato aperto ? Te lo chiedo perchè sono rimasti i tag construction=primary.

Grazie

IlBano
le_bistrot (2023-01-22 14:23:59+00:00): svincolo attualmente aperto. tag rimossi
IlBano (2023-01-22 14:45:41+00:00): grazie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:14:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
eggie (2023-01-16 08:39:09+00:00): Mooi opgeleverd. Ik heb de ook de specificatie verwijderd construction=.... 
Die mag er ook af na oplevering. 
MVG
eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:31:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:41:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:55:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
Glassman (2023-01-19 00:03:21+00:00): #TIP: if the footway is marked as private then tag it with access=private otherwise I'd just tag it as a highway=footway and informal=yes
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131326543