piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
jogro14 (2024-04-16 19:14:17+00:00): Da muss mir ein Copy&Paste-Fehler passiert sein. Die stop positions sind korrekt eingetragen
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3342840342
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3342840343

Wenn du nicht widersprichst, würde ich die beiden Nodes, die du oben verlinkt hast löschen.
ManuelB701 (2024-04-16 19:55:45+00:00): Kein Widerspruch.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-08-11 14:16:58+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11688555446/history has maxspeed = national that was added in this edit
What it means? Does it mean that no speed limit is explicitly signed? Then maybe maxspeed:signed=no would be better and more clear?
Dodko (2024-03-08 08:53:49+00:00): Adresa má mať aj addr:city
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=148373144
Frans S (2024-03-08 13:06:40+00:00): Hello. See my previous comment on a changeset.
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148183082
Frans S (2024-03-08 13:08:23+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Included yard in a mapping
vague objects mapped as a building


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148183082
Baloo Uriza (2024-03-11 01:56:41+00:00): One suggestion would be to include the name of the street on the sidewalks.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148183149
eggie (2024-03-04 06:47:30+00:00): Tip.. Je fietsenstalling zit vast aan de landuse=residential. Denk beter losmaken.

Groet..
eggie
eggie (2024-03-04 06:48:14+00:00): https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=148183213
eggie (2024-03-04 08:55:40+00:00): Jesper  .. hij ligt weer los.  De node met bicycle_parking heb ik verwijderd. Dat geeft een foutmelding parking in parking.
Groet
eggie
Frans S (2024-03-08 13:04:42+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
inaccurate mapped/ oversized mapped


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148183464
Yap_OSM (2025-01-05 11:24:48+00:00): Ces installations sont toujours en place dans la friche. Elles méritent leur cartographie.
InsertUser (2024-03-09 01:12:37+00:00): Please saves edits in one part of the world before continuing to edit in another.
bolare (2024-03-06 18:01:44+00:00): Corregida la información del centro. Se trata de un colegio.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148308379
Frans S (2024-03-10 09:00:42+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 
A few remarks. Please do not connect nodes of buildings to each other.
Follow the outlines of buildings (other changesets) More precisely. 
Please adjust (move aside next to the buildings) the landuse residential tracks when they cross buildings.
Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148184005
Jordi MF (2024-03-03 23:06:12+00:00): Hola y bienvenido a OSM,

Aquí no existe ningún hospital. Elimino la información.

Saludos
CjMalone (2024-03-06 19:56:29+00:00): Looks good to me, thanks.

(FYI you have "review requested" enabled)
clay_c (2024-05-05 16:53:56+00:00): Hi homeslice60148,

I came across this edit when investigating the changing of the ref value on this stretch of road to "SH" then back to "TX". There's now an ongoing discussion of which one should be considered correct. I invite you to join in if you have any opinions or insights.

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/should-ref-for-texas-state-highways-begin-with-tx-or-sh/112783/11
silversurfer83 (2024-03-04 07:29:43+00:00): Hallo nochmal :)

du hast bei einigen deiner Änderungen der Torgasse darum gebeten, dass sich das jemand ansieht.

Um das beurteilen zu können, müsste ich wissen, was du vorhast und wie die Situation vor Ort ist. Bitte beschreibt das mal.

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148184985
CjMalone (2024-03-06 08:35:21+00:00): Looks good to me, thanks
CjMalone (2024-03-06 08:29:59+00:00): Looks good to me, thanks
Fraxi (2024-03-03 23:44:07+00:00): Used Mapillary, too.
maraf24 (2024-04-10 18:25:05+00:00): Naprawdę przemierzyłeś drogę wzdłuż całej tej granicy?
emersonveenstra (2024-03-06 14:15:28+00:00): Hi there,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16706669#map=17/32.14490/-110.97022 is now broken due to the changes you made, could you please fix it? Thanks!
fortera_au (2024-03-04 00:23:02+00:00): Hey Evlyn, thanks for fixing that up!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148185674
Baloo Uriza (2024-11-22 16:18:17+00:00): refs are not names.  name=Interstate Highway 40 is not correct, but ref=I 40, noname=yes is.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148185813
Marek-M (2024-03-04 09:29:18+00:00): Cześć, liczby w OSM z wartościami dziesiętnymi zapisujemy z kropką a nie z przecinkiem - w ostatnich edycjach dodałeś trochę tagów height z przecinkami przy wartościach dziesiętnych. Dasz radę to poprawić?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:height#Niepoprawne_wartości
AndersAndersson (2024-03-04 17:51:00+00:00): Hej och välkommen till OpenStreetMap!
Jag flyttade adressen på huset till separata adresstaggar.

Fortsätt gärna lägga in mer detaljer i området. Lokalkännedom är ovärderligt.
simo_explorer (2024-03-06 13:27:16+00:00): Hi dmich9, what does the tag mean: "python = scripts/main.py" ? Can you check your latest changesets?
Ewen Hill (2024-03-04 12:26:51+00:00): Hi and welcome to editing and your request for a review. Your edits look excellent with the surface and maxspeed as a bonus! The only thing is that the two turning lanes need to connect to the footpath/shared path by using a connecting node.  Keep mapping and thanks again
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148187152
citrula (2024-03-04 04:51:37+00:00): Please don't duplicate features. The playground already existed before, and you have now mapped it another time.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148187484
TumeStone (2024-04-19 01:35:27+00:00): Sorry, still learning, won't happen again.
citrula (2024-04-19 05:41:32+00:00): It's no problem, but please read your changeset comments for feedback from others!
CoyKoi (2024-03-05 02:00:47+00:00): Hi ParaBala, welcome to OpenStreetMap editing, thank you for your contributions. I have reviewed your edits and seen the shortcut you have added between Salamanca Road and Aralia Road. I appreciate your intention of improving the pedestrian network in this area, but unfortunately this shortcut is not suitable for mapping in OSM because it cuts through private residential properties. As it is not a path that would be expected to be used by the general public, it should not be included in the OSM project, at risk of causing confusion or conflict with residents.
michael60634 (2024-03-29 13:25:24+00:00): Reverted in 148798893.
Vegman1948 (2026-06-17 01:17:11+00:00): The northern leg of Cork St-Upjohn was de-energized years ago.
svansing (2026-06-17 02:53:48+00:00): Thank you for the information.  I have made the update.
NeisBot (2024-03-19 15:45:46+00:00): Hello xSilmarilSx, thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.Please see https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments \n
Thanks!

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
Pesig0 (2024-03-08 10:40:13+00:00): This commit removed tag 'capital' and all non-latin names of the city. I suggest it should be reverted.
citrula (2024-03-04 06:52:41+00:00): Please press "Q" to square your buildings
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148189257
ndm (2024-03-04 21:06:25+00:00): It's a building passage - coverd isn't a meaningful tag.
Gorger (2024-03-06 06:14:34+00:00): Hi ndm, Thank you for your feedback. I have changed the data back to its previous version and I will be more cautious in these situations going forwards.
tastrax (2024-03-04 10:27:04+00:00): Hi Folks,

The area code and leading zero is not required for mobile numbers.

Cheers
phoenixsaigon1698 (2024-03-06 02:31:58+00:00): Công ơi, relation 17303026 cấm mọi phương tiện rẽ trái từ Huỳnh Tấn Phát ở ngã ba Dương Cát Lợi có từ khi nào nhỉ? Vì khi có biển báo này sẽ không điều hướng xe quay đầu ở Huỳnh Tấn Phát từ hướng đi Trung Tâm Thành Phố về hướng Nhà Bè được do vướng relation cấm rẽ trái này.
Ponsyano (2024-03-04 13:58:47+00:00): Hii, 
Thank for your contribution. Looks great.
You have describe "place of worship", what is the name of this place?...please make sure to add with the name.
rskedgell (2024-03-06 07:25:29+00:00): The POI you have created is in South London, but has an address and postcode in Southampton, together with what appears to be a Bangladeshi telephone number. Wherever it is, it's not here.
Plenz (2024-03-04 06:03:46+00:00): Sorry, I was only able to select "builing" and I could not select "tower". I hope somebody can correct it.
ChrissW-R1 (2024-03-16 10:46:56+00:00): https://osm.org/way/51827375

Bitte einmal surface checken. Hier sind zwei tags mit unterschiedlichen Werten vorhanden.
öreg (2024-03-18 01:17:07+00:00): Hi, ChrissW-R1                                                              Bei mir funktionalt weder JOSM, noch Potlacht3. Ich kann alles machen, aber die Änderungen kann ich nicht hochladen. Bei Potlacht z.B. habe ich das Hochladen gedrückt, dann wird es angezeigt, aber es geht nicht hoch. Auch bach einer 3/4 Stunde lädt es noch! Ich würde Pawin Stones lassen, aber ändere os wie Du denkst.                                         Gruß    Georg
ChrissW-R1 (2024-09-08 21:25:22+00:00): Habe 'sett' nach deinen Informationen entfernt.

https://osm.org/changeset/156369708
Ra_colate (2024-07-18 08:30:14+00:00): Hello chacha74
Thank you for mapping!
I have added connectivity in way 1268968028.
Please inspect your task carefully before closing.
Happy Mapping!
crushtheserpent (2024-03-04 06:13:02+00:00): The chief justification for the upgrade to primary: posted speed limits and connections to freeways and the road network
Kovoschiz (2024-03-04 06:41:31+00:00): Please don't merge arbitrarily. You removed the tapering section with `placement=transition` , and caused `turn:lanes=` to only appear downstream of the stopping line.
T－T (2024-03-04 06:54:43+00:00): noted! didnt aware of that! thanks!
GinaroZ (2024-03-27 16:04:59+00:00): Thanks, but just be aware that you added a duplicate petrol station here on the roof area (which I've now removed)
Savinja (2024-03-28 11:52:20+00:00): Hi GinaroZ, Thank you for your feedback and removing the duplicate tags from fuel station roof polygon. I will be cautious with dealing such cases with my future edits.
ndm (2024-03-04 21:04:47+00:00): The footpath is over the shops on layer 1 -- why is it now marked as layer 0?
Gorger (2024-03-06 13:31:14+00:00): Hi ndm, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you.
Gorger (2024-03-07 06:57:10+00:00): Thank you for feedback.  Based on your feedback and my reassessment of the situation I have reverted the layer of the footpath back to =1 where it crosses the buildings below.
Spush (2024-03-04 08:48:21+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/215224881
Most ebből miért kellett farmlandot csinálni egy farmland közepén?
kogutowicz-mano (2024-03-04 08:52:51+00:00): Mert ez közelebb áll a valósághoz, mint ami előtte volt.
Spush (2024-03-04 08:54:05+00:00): Ami azelőtt volt az meg egy kerítés. Valószínű az áll a legközelebb a valósághoz.
kogutowicz-mano (2024-03-04 10:18:56+00:00): Nézd csak meg jobban!
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/215224881/history
kogutowicz-mano (2024-03-04 15:14:08+00:00): Ja, hogy AdrianP998 **előtt** volt kerítés! Igen.
De a kérdés az volt, hogy miért csináltam toronyból farmlandot, és hogy ez rontott vagy javított az adatbázison.

Azt soha nem ígértem, hogy egy lépésben tökéletessé teszem a világot. :-) Vagy kivárod, hogy sorra kerüljön a kerítés, vagy türelmetlenül belerakod saját kezűleg.
TrickyFoxy (2024-03-04 08:54:48+00:00): Ссылку на вики об этом в студию
mavl (2024-11-13 08:50:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159081298 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible sources - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16857].
MxxCon (2024-03-07 03:09:23+00:00): Hello.
Considering the descriptions of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Dcircular and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Droundabout 
Could you please elaborate why did you change this tagging?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148193213
tux67 (2024-03-04 08:02:29+00:00): Sorry for the large spread from Bavaria to NRW
eggie (2024-03-04 08:34:43+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback Alle adresnodes komen als import vanuit de BAG. Vaak liggen ze na import op een hoopje en kun je ze zelf naar een andere positie slepen. Hier is het niet helemaal goed gegaan. Ik zal het herstellen. 
Ook krijgt een gebouwomtrek geen adres.
Hier zijn de verschillende adressen niet meer te vinden.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=148193869
Beter niet combineren. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-03-04 08:39:03+00:00): reverted by changeset #148195107

Wanneer je nog vragen hebt stel ze gerust
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-03-04 08:45:40+00:00): Je kunt als je heel goed inzoomt de adresnodes verplaatsen.
Dat ze op een hoopje liggen is geen probleem.
Voor bezorgdiensten is het wel handig om de juiste adresnodes naar de verschillende gebouwingangen te verplaatsen. 
Wanneer je de adresnodes naar elkaar schuift plakken ze aan elkaar en krijg je combinaties. Dat is niet gewenst.
Met editor josm zal het wellicht beter lukken. Editor iD is niet ideaal. Die heeft ingebouwde lijm.

editor josm stap voor stap 

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/editor-josm-stap-voor-stap/75047
alexey_zakharenkov (2024-03-05 21:15:17+00:00): У вас одно здание нарисовано поверх другого, при этом один и тот же адрес дублируется на обоих контурах. Исправьте, пожалуйста.
eleonora01 (2024-03-06 07:35:27+00:00): Добрый день! И как правильно в данном случае поступить? Часть здания является коммерческим, а другая часть многоквартирным жилым домом. Выделить полностью всё зданию и дать тег "многоквартирный дом", а также в нём же указать коммерческое здание, как "часть здания"?
alexey_zakharenkov (2024-03-06 08:07:16+00:00): Если конструктивно это одно здание, то и объект building=* должен быть один. Если трудно определить его назначение, то ставьте building=yes, если же можно выделить основное назначение, то его и прописываете. На весь дом вешаете адресные и другие теги, одинаковые для всех частей.

Внутри этого контура нужно создать два вложенных контура с тегами building:part=commercial и apartments соответственно, каждая со своей этажностью и, возможно, другими отличающимися свойствами.
eleonora01 (2024-03-07 08:00:30+00:00): Спасибо за ответ!
MxxCon (2024-03-07 03:14:20+00:00): Hello.
Why are you deleting icao= tags?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:icao
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148194033
mueschel (2024-03-17 09:43:05+00:00): You added many new "faa:lid" tags here. The common tag for this reference number is "faa". Please have a look and change these tags.
MxxCon (2024-04-20 05:21:46+00:00): I'll give this a couple more days to reply and if no answer I'll fully revert this and similar edits and report this account to DWG.
flohoff (2024-03-04 08:28:05+00:00): Moin,
das sieht nicht gesund aus hier. Gebäude im Gebäude ist ein semantischer fehler. 

Dazu kommt das der Cube Store jetzt 2 mal drin ist. Einmal als Gebäude im Gebäude und einmal als Node.

Das mit dem Node ist schon richtig - Die Fläche/Gebäude gehört da nicht hin.

Flo
julcnx (2024-04-26 05:29:29+00:00): Hi Andi, thanks for your contributions! what did you mean by 'access=no' on these primary highway sections. Are these under construction?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148194613
andi9876 (2024-04-26 06:00:45+00:00): Hi.
The border crossing and access roads are still closed.

https://www.khmertimeskh.com/501360508/cambodia-thailand-stung-bot-ban-nong-ian-international-border-crossing-more-than-90-percent-completed/
BCNorwich (2024-03-04 12:35:37+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I wonder does The Car Edition operate from the whole of that building? If not then the building should be split into the separate units and The Car Edition placed on its unit. Alternatively the business should be a placed on a node appropriately placed within the building.

Regards Bernard.
silversurfer83 (2024-03-04 09:45:45+00:00): Hi :)

du hast da einen Bahnübergang entfernt aber 
a) nicht gesagt warum
und
b) das so entstandene Ende des Weges nicht ordentlich gekennzeichnet.

In deinem Kommentar wäre gut, einen Grund zu nennen und außerdem eine Quelle für die Änderung. Und so lange auf den Luftbildern zu sehen ist, dass der Weg die Gleise kreuzt brauchen wir an den Wegenden passende Hinweise an andere Mapper, den Übergang nicht wieder einzuzeichnen.
Das kann mittels "note=*" passieren.
Außerdem kann der alte Übergangspunkt mit lifecycle prefixes versehen werden und auch einen Hinweis bekommen.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148194922
Jowanesu (2024-03-04 10:09:35+00:00): Danke für die Hinweise. Ich habe das Changeset wiederhergestellt und entsprechend neue Änderungen vorgenommen. Ich hoffe, dass ist so richtig und verständlich.
silversurfer83 (2024-03-04 11:15:59+00:00): Danke für die schnelle Reaktion :)

Sieht ziemlich gut aus 👍🏻

Alles Gute
Silversurfer83
InsertUser (2024-03-09 01:09:03+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
michael60634 (2024-03-18 05:39:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted in full.
Warin61 (2024-03-28 23:26:39+00:00): Hi,
I think you have forgotten this broken bus route relation 13332390...
NorthCrab_upload (2024-03-04 08:50:28+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1020068840

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-07-15 09:41:29+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/931168782/history has surface = steel that was added in this edit
Maybe surface=metal material=steel would be better tagging? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface%3Dmetal
DENelson83 (2025-07-15 15:15:04+00:00): Sure.
Tomas Straupis (2024-03-04 10:00:36+00:00): Hello. We have an agreement in Lithuania NOT to tag lanes as separate ways (unless there is a physical barrier). So previous tagging was more correct. Lane information is tagged using different lane tags.
InsertUser (2024-03-09 01:04:14+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
WandelendeFietser (2024-03-09 13:26:36+00:00): Dit betreft een tijdelijke weg die gister (8-3-2024) toegankelijk was. Deze weg blijft in stant zolang de werkzaamheden aan de straten in de achterliggende woonwijk zijn afgerond.
AndersAndersson (2024-03-04 18:05:49+00:00): Hej!
Adressen finns redan på byggnaden och ska inte sättas i namnet. Radhus beskrivs med building=house eftersom detta är ritat som separata byggnader. Skulle alla radhus ha ritats som en enda stor byggnad hade taggen varit building=terrace.
rskedgell (2024-03-06 07:20:58+00:00): Where sidewalks were tagged with sidewalk:both=separate, please could you replace with sidewalk:left=separate rather than when splitting sidewalk=separate? I've spent quite a lot of time checking and changing sidewalk=separate tags to sidewalk:$side=separate.

I've fixed the separate sidewalk tagging here in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148278957
Flamen_Sru (2024-03-07 04:48:33+00:00): Thank you rskedgell for the valuable feedback and for making the fixes. I’ll be more cautious while dealing with the sidewalk tags.
rempshaener (2024-10-18 17:33:50+00:00): Hallo,
das ist ein normales Wohnhaus - sicher, dass es sich um ein "office" im OSM-Sinne handelt?
Viele Grüße
rempshaener (2024-10-25 20:17:43+00:00): erledigt
redd (2024-03-24 19:56:23+00:00): super Arbeit und danke für deine Mitarbeit bei OpenStreetMap!
Christoph Rackwitz (2024-03-17 17:12:28+00:00): Jenaer Str 24-36 haben komische Sporne dran. Maproulette https://maproulette.org/challenge/43419/task/221291643 bemängelt das.
Man sollte ALKIS nicht zu genau nehmen. Das sind einfach Überlappungen der Parzellen und der Gebäudegeometrie (mehrere Reihenhäuser, ein Bauwerk). Vielleicht sollte ein Lokaler das beurteilen.
flohoff (2024-03-17 21:36:51+00:00): Wo steht das man das mit dem ALKIS nicht zu genau nehmen soll?  Ich kenne da keine Stelle. 

Ich übernehme via Point and Click seit mehr als 10 jahren Gebäude aus dem ALKIS und pflege die regelmäßig nach.

Flo
flohoff (2024-03-17 21:38:21+00:00): Ach ja - ich habe u.a. für Gütersloh aber auch für viele andere Bundesländer die das ALKIS respektive Hausumringe als OpenData veröffentlichen auch Diffs gebaut so wie dieses:

https://osm.zz.de/dbview/?db=alkisdiff&layer=buildingnotinosm#51.90524,8.36609,17z

Hatte ich ja auch mehrfach im Forum schon zu berichtet.

Flo