piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
rajdhani (2026-03-29 07:29:50+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:180569136
eggie (2026-03-25 18:03:13+00:00): Welkom bij OSM. Bedankt voor je bijdrage. De info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode.
MVG
eggie
Marek-M (2026-03-26 10:02:05+00:00): Cześć, chodniki (highway=footway) implikują tagi bicycle=no	
foot=designated

więc są one tam zbędne.

Usunąłem je z tego chodnika
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/826589696
NeisBot (2026-03-25 17:12:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13679544776 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Real estate agency"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-02 22:33:06+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180789307
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
NeisBot (2026-03-25 17:15:41+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 11 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1492785233 v1 | 11 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180418393
MINGTIANZHIHOU (2026-03-26 05:24:11+00:00): 没开工的东西不要画
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:06:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
rodolfovargas (2026-03-26 00:27:09+00:00): Hola Keila. Considera ESCUADRAR los edificios (aplica Q en el teclado). 
Continua contribuyendo.
Palolo (2026-05-06 05:39:34+00:00): @paisleylopez
What is the source of this mapping please? OpenStreetMap is not a game.
aharvey (2026-03-30 23:24:06+00:00): Usually the name only contains a "proper name" not something like "comming soon..." see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

If needed that can go into the description like you have, but usually shop=vacant is sufficient.
aharvey (2026-03-30 23:24:23+00:00): refering to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1043256280/history
GreenPastel (2026-04-01 12:38:01+00:00): That's fair, but I thought it could only do more good then harm to make it obvious that a new shop will appear here sometime soon.
GreenPastel (2026-04-01 14:16:39+00:00): Okay, I removed the name and kept the coming soon details in the description.
eggie (2026-03-25 18:04:44+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback.. Probeer svp bij te taggen op de bestaande adresnodes. Dus geen (incomplete ) adressen aanmaken. 

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-03-25 18:09:16+00:00): Ik heb wat info samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnodes.
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:06:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:06:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
VLD0251 (2026-03-28 21:57:03+00:00): Remember to add a comment (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments) and a source (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source) to every changeset, as previously requested.
iandees (2026-03-25 18:02:32+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13676184802 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180420822, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
Udarian (2026-03-25 18:23:14+00:00): This edit is incorrect, the merge lane was already mapped using tagging on the highway=motorway_link, encoding that with geometry makes the map worse by making it less useful.

Happy mapping,
Udar.
VLD0251 (2026-03-28 21:52:48+00:00): Remember to add a comment (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments) and a source (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source) to every changeset, as previously requested.
rle32795 (2026-04-20 11:43:32+00:00): Koko osuudelle on vaihdettu highway=construction (tien tyypiksi rakenteilla oleva), mikä myös tarkoittaisi että tie on suljettu.
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-26 18:19:23+00:00): Partly reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180464918
webfil (2026-03-26 17:16:54+00:00): Bonjour. Merci pour vos contributions sur OpenStreetMap. J'ai dû annuler la plupart d'entre elles parce qu'elles ont fait disparaître des noms qui ont fait l'objet d'une officialisation auprès du gouvernement, comme le secteur Sainte-Anne-du-Sault de la ville de Daveluyville (https://toponymie.gouv.qc.ca/ct/ToposWeb/Fiche.aspx?no_seq=430327), le hameau de Defoy (https://toponymie.gouv.qc.ca/ct/ToposWeb/Fiche.aspx?no_seq=17382) ou encore dont le nom n'a pas changé après la fusion, comme l'église Sainte-Anne-du-Sault (https://lieuxdeculte.qc.ca/fiche.php?LIEU_CULTE_ID=52119). Aussi, quand un lieu change de nom, comme pour la halte routière de Daveluyville, il est de coutume de garder l'ancien nom dans les attributs, avec tag:old_name.
eggie (2026-03-25 18:05:44+00:00): Dag GertJan. probeer svp bij te taggen op de bestaande adresnodes. Die selecteren en dan info bijtaggen.
MVG
eggie
NeisBot (2026-03-25 17:54:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 11 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1492803084 v1 | 6 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1492803085 v1 | 5 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180420372
NeisReview (2026-04-02 22:33:21+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/180438418
rskedgell (2026-03-25 20:44:15+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The name of the business (Inner Peace Counselling Service) should really go in the name=* tag rather than addr:housename=* 

If they're not the sole occupier of the building, it is usually better to add the POI as a node (point) within the building's outline.

Finally, you need to add tags to tell data consumers what sort of feature you have added. In this case, I'd suggest healthcare=counselling

If you would like any help, feel free to ask and I'll do what I can.
amosharper (2026-03-26 08:59:21+00:00): As this has been added as a node in subsequent changeset changeset/180420624, I've now removed the business name from addr:housename=* on the building area, and added address tags to that node: changeset/180443291
rskedgell (2026-03-26 11:59:57+00:00): Thanks @amosharper
rempshaener (2026-03-25 21:21:42+00:00): Hallo,
eine Grundwassermessstelle wäre
man_made=monitoring_station
monitoring:groundwater=yes
Am besten einfach die bisherigen Tags löschen und die vorstehenden einfügen.
Viele Grüße
Udarian (2026-03-25 18:22:15+00:00): This edit is incorrect, the merge lane was already mapped using tagging on the highway=motorway_link, encoding that with geometry makes the map worse by making it less useful. 

Happy mapping,
Udar.
Statler75 (2026-04-20 00:09:10+00:00): A lot of these trails still exist and should not have been deleted (especially on the west side of Stony Road.  Some have disappeared (mostly on the east side) so they were ok to delete.
VLD0251 (2026-03-28 21:51:40+00:00): Remember to add a comment (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments) and a source (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source) to every changeset, as previously requested.
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:01:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
VLD0251 (2026-03-28 21:50:40+00:00): Remember to add a comment (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments) and a source (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source) to every changeset, as previously requested.
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:08:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
mtmail (2026-03-30 09:56:52+00:00): Is the that a addr:housename in addr:postcode for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1492816276 ? I'm asking because only 1 of the 5 buildings has the name
NeisBot (2026-03-25 18:16:14+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your changesets and noticed that the cumulative count of your recent edits (4 changesets) shows that 346 of your last 346 changes were deletions. This is quite an unusual proportion, so I wanted to check with you.

Could you please confirm whether these deletions were intentional or if they may have occurred by mistake?

#DeletionsCheck #Cumulative
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?uid=23977117
Udarian (2026-03-25 18:25:23+00:00): it does look like something is there so you should have kept the building, or at least tagged it as a wall or something else.

Happy mapping,
Udar.
PowerMapper77 (2026-03-25 19:18:27+00:00): Should I try an undelete the ways or just redraw the object?
NeisBot (2026-03-25 18:12:21+00:00): Hi kiwibes, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 97% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 36 building(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180421262
SomeoneElse (2026-03-26 12:07:25+00:00): Looks OK to me.
The "number of objects deleted" is large because some buildings with a large number of nodes (presumably circular) were deleted.  They were likely temporary structures and there's no obvious evidence for them on available imagery.
NeisBot (2026-03-25 18:15:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/582007926 v5

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Real Estate Office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-02 22:33:09+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180789310
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:11:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
HirschKauz (2026-03-28 13:55:33+00:00): Hi! 
Attention de ne pas modifier d'autres éléments ;-) 
https://aleung.github.io/osm-visual-history/#/way/95125321
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180421590
bxl-forever (2026-03-29 13:30:15+00:00): I reverted the edit on a London building yesterday.

This track in France https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1492819838 looks like it is duplicating an existing footway. Aerial imagery shows there is only one path; it looks like you inadvertently drew this on top of existing data.  Please have a second look and remove duplicate data.
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:08:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
Dimitar155 (2026-03-25 21:16:36+00:00): Изглежда окей, с единствената подробност че ограничението от 30 км/ч важи до повдигнатата пътека, а не до следващото кръстовище, както изглежда че сте отбелязали.

За справка чл. 62 от наредбата за сигнализация на пътищата с пътни знаци - https://www.mrrb.bg/static/media/ups/articles/attachments/c6bbb7126009b907c0b2eb5a753750ad.pdf
sa62 (2026-03-26 19:07:47+00:00): Мерси, отразих го в https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180470678 .
Може пак да е моя грешна интерпретация, но ми се стори логично когато има две поредни повдигнати пешеходни (както на няколко от спирките) ограничението да отпада след втората. Ако трябва, ще го съкратя да си е само до първата.
Dimitar155 (2026-03-27 18:57:12+00:00): И аз благодаря. И на мен ми се струва логично да е до втората пътека. Съмнявам се да са взели предвид подобни случаи в наредбата :)
Comino (2026-03-25 18:59:16+00:00): Hi,

In your edit you use the tag "payment:cryptocurrencies=yes".

The tag "payment:cryptocurrencies=*" was a payment tag proposal which was rejected by the OSM community. Use this tag only when cryptocurrencies are NOT accepted.
Source: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Cryptocurrencies_with_payment_tag and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:payment:*#Cryptocurrencies

Please REMOVE the payment:cryptocurrencies=yes !

Thank you.

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
BTC Map
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Comino
bielebog (2026-03-26 18:21:40+00:00): Hallo,

in diesem Changeset hast Du anscheinend real vorhandene Zufahrtsstraßen gelöscht. Wenn es hier Routingprobleme gibt, kann man das besser per access-Tags an den vorhandenen Objekten modellieren.
MoMo83 (2026-03-26 18:27:14+00:00): Dies ist keine zufahrtsstraße sondern eine einfahrt direkt in die tiefgarage. Nicht Anwohner dürfen dort nicht reinfahren
bielebog (2026-03-26 22:44:25+00:00): Genau. Und mit dem tag access=* modelliert man eben diese Zufahrtsrechte. In diesem Fall wäre access=private angemessen, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:access%3Dprivate 

Da die Zufahrt ja nicht abgerissen wurde (heute gecheckt) habe ich sie wieder aus dem Datennirvana gerettet und auch den Hausumriss der Wirmerstraße 16 mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180478385 wieder repariert, um wieder den Status Quo vor Ort in OpenStreetMap abzubilden.

Amazon selber st übrigens auch am Prozess der Erfassung von Zufahrten beteiligt, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities/Amazon#Editing_process

Beste Grüße,

 bielebog
MoMo83 (2026-03-27 09:56:13+00:00): Da du jetzt alles umgebaut hast. Führt die NAvigation und Route zu Josef-Wirmer-WEg 16 bis 22 wieder über die Zufahrtsstr. zur Tiefgarage über Riemekestr. Endet dahin, dass die PAketzusteller vor einer MAuer stehen und nicht im Josef-Wirmer-WEg landen. Ich bitte dann zumindesten zu Supporten, wenn alles wieder zurückgesetzt wurde, und die Route so anzupassen, dass man im Josef-Wirmer-Weg landet, wenn man navigiert. Sonst bleibt das Problem mit den Zustellern weiterhin für die halbe Siedlung.
MoMo83 (2026-03-27 14:45:58+00:00): Ergänzung. Ich habe gesehen, dass du das vernüftig umgebaut hast und access:privat bei der nebenstraße eingetragen. Bringt nur nichts, er navigert in den Josef-Wirmer-Weg immer noch über die Nebenstraße die ein Sackgasse ist und wo man vor einer Mauer landet. Und somit finden die Paketzusteller wieder die Adressen nicht.
bielebog (2026-04-04 15:13:56+00:00): Bis jeder Router die Daten aktualisiert hat, dauert es einige Tage. Teste es bitte erneut. 

Leider wird man das solche Spezialfälle im Routing nicht generell lösen können. Das einzige Ziel kann sein, die Realität möglichst genau abzubilden, anstatt die Realität für nur einen Anwendungsfall zu verbiegen. Das bringt immer Kollateralschäden mit sich.

Das Routing zu Adressen funktioniert in den meisten Fällen, nur einige Spezialfälle sind eben knifflig.

Bei Interesse: Dieser Thread beleuchtet die verschiedenen Ansätze und das grundlegende Problem gut:

¹ https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/routing-zugang-aus-der-falschen-strasse/131287/15
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:13:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
World_Winner (2026-03-26 11:20:45+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: 180448765
JakovBušić (2026-03-27 12:28:07+00:00): Wrong restriction that was made in this changeset was set right in changeset/180499927. #OptimoRoute
Jarek 🚲 (2026-04-21 16:23:29+00:00): Hello, when mapping in Toronto please make sure to use the "Toronto Orthorecrified Imagery" background imagery, which is several years newer than Bing's. This dirt road has long been removed.
349179440 (2026-06-21 12:35:36+00:00): OK, I will.
Kees 59 (2026-04-20 10:16:50+00:00): Lijkt erop dat email is blijven "plakken"?

Volgens de website (https://bakkerijhetzand.nl/roosendaal/) van Bakkerij 't Zand zou hier nu een vestiging van hen zijn? Kan jij dit bevestigen dan wel ontkrachten?
kuhni74 (2026-03-27 14:45:56+00:00): danke herzlichst!
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:09:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
NeisBot (2026-03-25 19:06:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/351644276 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Hostel rooms"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-04-02 22:33:12+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/180424341
NeisBot (2026-03-25 19:06:47+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13659841447 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Med Spa"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-04-02 22:33:15+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/180562907
NeisBot (2026-03-25 19:09:47+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13659841447 v4

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Med Spa"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-04-02 22:33:17+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/180562907
NieWnen (2026-03-25 19:51:57+00:00): Źródło?
olo81 (2026-04-08 18:17:11+00:00): zdublowałeś tą edycją warsztat https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/219285168/history
grzegorz75jan (2026-04-08 18:46:33+00:00): Głos wołającego na pustyni https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/C2oc4/blocks
C2oc4 (2026-05-24 07:20:03+00:00): poprawiono
olo81 (2026-06-14 15:10:00+00:00): Nie poprawiono.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-06-14 16:51:31+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/219285168 nadal ma car_repair a pewnie nie powinno mieć

wskazano ci że https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9667563972 jest jego dublem

proszę, popraw ten błąd

a potem zacznij przeglądać inne stare błędy z https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=6353007 i zacznij je poprawiać

i nie twierdź że coś poprawiłeś jak dalej jest zepsute
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-06-17 14:32:53+00:00): a dodatkowo https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9667563972 ma zamiast nazwy nazwę i opis w name=

name= powinno zawierać tylko nazwę

opis idzie do opisu, do pola description=
C2oc4 (2026-07-11 06:35:48+00:00): dubla warsztatu poprawiłem
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:10:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
czebureks (2026-04-18 22:44:35+00:00): Cześć, czy tu aby na pewno ma powstać cmentarz? Nie widzę nigdzie o tym żadnej wzmianki w mediach.
literan (2026-03-26 19:14:36+00:00): на снимках Esri разворот отлично виден, исправлю.

Бинг - устаревшие снимки
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 08:59:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
NeisBot (2026-03-25 19:46:14+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your changesets and noticed that the cumulative count of your recent edits (2 changesets) shows that 375 of your last 391 changes were deletions. This is quite an unusual proportion, so I wanted to check with you.

Could you please confirm whether these deletions were intentional or if they may have occurred by mistake?

#DeletionsCheck #Cumulative
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?uid=11102030
zstadler (2026-03-25 21:58:41+00:00): The deleted bike trail was deliberately built beside the gravel road because that road is hard for bikers.
It can be seen clearly in the GPS traces downloadable in JOSM.

The user also created a disconnected several other ways, including
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/314369378
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/314369965
and 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/246990640