piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Nicolas1018 (2026-04-12 10:25:46+00:00): Merci pour ce retour. 
Pour information, l'ensemble des logements des étages supérieurs entrent par le 8/10 rue des plantaporrets. Les entrées des arcades au rez sont vers la rue de la Puiserande (5, 7 et 9).
Suite à ton retour, j'ai proposé des corrections selon 
https://map.sitg.ge.ch/app/?share=88951bd3-7f00-4f8f-92a4-8f40539c6a94 et https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Adresses#B%C3%A2timents_avec_plusieurs_num%C3%A9ros_d'adresses
qu'en penses-tu ?
9_tab (2026-04-13 10:08:27+00:00): ça semble plus clair et les numéros sont correctement attribués pour ces entrées. Alex‑7 les avait renseignés de façon assez exhaustive et il est rarement nécessaire d'en supprimer. Je ne vois pas d'inconvénient à appliquer le numéro de l'entrée principale à l'ensemble de l'immeuble (peut-être 8-10 ne font qu'un?). A noter que SITG ne reflète pas forcément tous les numéros relevés sur place.
StC (2026-04-10 16:40:19+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre qui passe par là. Je m'occupe de la réparation.
NeisBot (2026-04-10 12:51:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13718452128 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Bodega"
---
Por ejemplo, una versión más neutral y objetiva de tu texto podría ser: "Bodega"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
iandees (2026-04-10 14:31:19+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/283049082 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181150865, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
rempshaener (2026-04-10 18:30:55+00:00): Hallo,
magst du diese ungewöhnliche Änderung - Ersetzen eines Gebäudes durch eine landuse-Fläche - erläutern?
Viele Grüße
rempshaener (2026-04-12 15:33:55+00:00): Just to make it a bit clearer:
The way you changed was a building. You changed the building to a landuse.
Even if the building had been razed: in this case you could have erased the way or – best practice – set it to razed:building=yes
Please explain the aim of your change.
Ge_Sh (2026-04-14 12:44:12+00:00): Hello, sorry for the late reply. The OSM imagery was not entirely clear and made the area look like a backyard rather than a building. Unfortunately, I'm not aware of the accurate local area layout, but upon double-checking of the surroundings it now looks like there may indeed be a building there. Should I revert the previous changes?
Kind regards
rempshaener (2026-04-14 15:57:07+00:00): Hello,
indeed, the building is not in a good shape, there is grass on the roof.
So I understand why it is quite difficult to identifiy.
I would appreciate reverting the change.
Kind regards
Ge_Sh (2026-04-15 11:54:21+00:00): Hello, I changed it back to building, so everything should be alright now.
Thank you for reaching out.
flex16 (2026-04-11 20:24:04+00:00): Hi, may I ask what's wrong with this tag? 

I believe I mapped this tag accordingly to the OSM wiki,: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:turn

It states: "While turn lane markings are the most obvious method of indicating turn directions, the turn=* key can be used in any situation where a manoeuvre is signed, marked or otherwise implied by road markings."

Since there are right turn markings on the road, this tag should be fine.
literan (2026-04-11 09:33:25+00:00): не надо писать в тег name все подряд (как "Автомат по продаже снеков"). он не для описаний, а для названий, имен собственных
user_23884811 (2026-04-12 11:23:38+00:00): Merhaba, bir sorum olacak: Hatların sökülmüş olması onların günümüzde tamamen olmaması anlamına mı geliyor? Yani ilgili yere gittiğinizde bu eski hatların varlığı gözle görülebiliyor mu?
eggie (2026-04-10 14:50:46+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
LidaCity (2026-04-14 07:59:44+00:00): День добрый.
1. Какой ваш источник по наименованию населённых пунктов?
Заметил вы много портите названий на беларускай мове.
2. Когда меняете название - не ставьте одинаковое название в name:be и alt_name:be - смысл этих тэгов показать основное название, и альтернативные названия в другом написании.

Не будье вандалом, пожалуйста
reg_or (2026-04-14 08:24:35+00:00): Мой источник - произношение местных жителей. А вы кто здесь такой, чтоб давать указания?
LidaCity (2026-04-14 08:41:30+00:00): Тогда ваш вариант - это name:be:word_stress (через ; если есть другие варианты, а они будут, в этот тэг разрешено добавлять включая совсем неправильные)

Но у вас ничего не получится, на белорусские названия существует скрипт (это не я), спустя некоторое время он вернёт все измененые названия на официальные названия согласно утверждённого справочника. Но увы alt_name:be не восстановится, т.е. получается вы правками уничтожаете alt_name:be.

Странно, что вы сделали много правок, и вас не заметили
Piskvor (2026-04-10 14:47:33+00:00): Not secondary. Even trunk in this specific area.
Piskvor (2026-04-10 14:46:33+00:00): How and when this became secondary?
Tomas_J (2026-04-10 18:33:28+00:00): Komentár od používateľa vojtechzaboril pred 3 dňami 
This road is still primary, I'm reverting your changes. Please stop doing this at-table changes without checking the reality.
wilder_luchs (2026-04-10 18:35:16+00:00): Ist das korrekt so? Das Aeronauticum ist ein Luftfahrtmuseum, per StreetComplete war "History" wohl das Passendste.
eggie (2026-04-10 16:55:21+00:00): Dag Xiffy,

bicycle en foot=yes zijn default. Die hoef je niet toe te voegen.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-04-10 16:53:47+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
opendcc (2026-04-11 04:13:09+00:00): OSM ist ein Gemeinschaftprojekt, bitte sieh Dir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments an.
enzo_immergis (2026-05-30 08:43:57+00:00): Salut Pierre, 
Pourquoi avoir passé cette section en shoulder ? way/307221064

Je ne vois pas de BMF : https://api.panoramax.xyz/fr/index?focus=pic&map=18.91/43.1275961/5.8527977&pic=ff0fe97a-1b2e-44fe-9efa-26d7f148d032&seq=f38b5977-33e4-4738-896b-6006c358bc66&speed=250&theme=default&users=default&xyz=264.70/0.00/30

(correction faite)
Mashin (2026-04-10 15:58:49+00:00): Hi Tad,
in this case fairway, rough, etc. tags don't go directly on the areas, because there are other objects inside (bunkers, greens,..). For such cases we use multipolygons.

see:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls
Busaiolis (2026-04-22 09:57:11+00:00): La rotatoria non era mappata perché non esiste in quella posizione. È stata rimossa qualche mese fa e verrà sostituita da uno svincolo! Ciò è visibile anche in questo articolo: https://www.ilnotiziario.net/wp/prima-pagina/maxi-svincolo-tra-arese-e-garbagnate-completato-il-ponte-sopra-la-rotatoria/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181152922
NeisBot (2026-04-10 15:15:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13721018387 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Office building"
---
Par exemple, une version plus neutre et factuelle de ton texte pourrait être : « Immeuble de bureaux »
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
pepsi_max2k (2026-06-03 08:33:41+00:00): Hey, was this changeset (specifically https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1144267159/history ) based off a recent survey? This road was blocked off by a construction zone as off Feb 2026 so if you simply went off sat imagery it would need reverting.
FanaticAir75626 (2026-06-04 04:18:01+00:00): Thank you. I have changed the access tag for way 1144267159.
kingkingHK (2026-04-11 03:29:40+00:00): I vaguely remember there is a rule saying "not all road forks are `=*_link`s; don't do link for roads under overpasses" but I can't find it now. Maybe @Kovoschiz would have something to say?
vectorial8192 (2026-04-11 07:32:04+00:00): I am not sure whether OSM user-tagging actually works. Also send to Discord just to be sure.
kingkingHK (2026-04-16 08:17:29+00:00): FYI partially reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181400518
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-11 13:01:51+00:00): Hallo, willkommen bei OSM.

Der Weg heisst wirklich "Tiny7sky"?

Viele Grüße
Tiny7sky (2026-04-12 11:13:40+00:00): Das ist mein Privatweg zu meinen Tinyhäusern
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-12 16:00:33+00:00): Danke für die Antwort. So wie der Weg gerade gemappt ist, wird dieser auch Privat bleiben ...
Yunan973 (2026-04-11 17:35:12+00:00): Bonjour,

merci de ne pas détruire les relations (sans le faire exprès je suis sûr), du fait d'un bug d'ID, cf. https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/11922

Cordialement
Yunan973 (2026-04-11 17:35:47+00:00): nb :  j'ai corrigé
infeeeee (2026-04-10 21:56:00+00:00): Volt már relációjuk: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16758273
qstep (2026-04-10 22:10:35+00:00): Köszi. Kapkodtam, javítom.
qstep (2026-04-10 22:22:38+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181169983
eggie (2026-04-10 16:55:41+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
NeisBot (2026-04-10 15:46:17+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your changesets and noticed that the cumulative count of your recent edits (2 changesets) shows that 358 of your last 360 changes were deletions. This is quite an unusual proportion, so I wanted to check with you.

Could you please confirm whether these deletions were intentional or if they may have occurred by mistake?

#DeletionsCheck #Cumulative
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?uid=23919091
NeisBot (2026-04-10 15:54:48+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/10983557582 v4

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Salon de coiffure"
---
Par exemple, une version plus neutre et factuelle de ton texte pourrait être : « Salon de coiffure »
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
Schramme (2026-05-26 10:16:36+00:00): Hallo Jacek79, du hast den Ringlokschuppen gelöscht. Bestimmt gibt es einen Grund, warum du den gelöscht hast und nicht mit dem Lifecycle-Prefix razed: versehen hast. Mit razed: wäre er in den Umrissen noch sichtbar und suchbar gewesen, würde aber nicht mehr auf der Karte angezeigt werden. Gerade bei historischen Objekten ist das eine schöne und interessante Möglichkeit sich Verläufe anzugucken oder danach zu filtern.
Spricht etwas dagegen, den Changeset rückgängig zu machen und das Gebäude mit razed: zu taggen? Beste Grüße Schramme
diamondarmorsteve (2026-04-10 15:54:59+00:00): source: National Address Database
eggie (2026-04-10 17:01:27+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback 
Alle begin is lastig. 
Niet simpelweg iets omzetten in een park. Dit gebeurt meestal om het spel PokemonGo te beïnvloeden.
Je verwijdert de details en vervangt deze door een transparant. 
Een park is een (uitgestrekt) terrein, omvattende stukken grasveld, bos en bosschages, vijvers, paden etc. Het is een soort deken over al het andere heen. Bovendien heeft het meestal een naam. 
Leisure=park is de functie en die moet je los zien van wat je ziet de landuse.
Hier een voorbeeld van een park met landuse en een losse cover leisure= park er helemaal los overheen. http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/51.80552/4.66665

De landuse heb ik hersteld.
De Andrej Sacharovstraat heb ik weer uitgelijnd.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=181155928
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
NeisBot (2026-04-10 16:15:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/1498239543 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Plant store"

#MapWithoutSpam
FajrAl (2026-04-19 06:16:04+00:00): Ikuti tutorial interaktifnya di editornya.
eggie (2026-04-10 17:04:28+00:00): Dag Michel.. Denk dat dit niet correct is om de naam er zo op te zetten. Bovendien is het toch niet alles een sportveld meer.
Crescendo (formerly)
Als het niet meer van Crescendo is kan di naam weg.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-04-10 17:09:09+00:00): De overkoepelende pitch heb ik omgezet naar leisure=sports_centre
Het park heb ik omgezets naar sport. Het ades heb ik verwijderd. Er is een adresnode.
De sportclub zou je ook op de adresnode kunnen bijtaggen.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-04-10 17:09:57+00:00): naam Cresendo formerly verwijderd
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-11 12:32:58+00:00): Hallo whymania, willkommen bei OSM.

Die Wege sind in den Satellitenbildern sichtbar und können daher auch in OSM gemappt werden. Ich werde daher das Changeset gleich rückgängig machen und zusätzlich danach das Tagging anpassen. Damit sollte dann ersichtlich sein, dass dies Privatwege sind.

Viele Grüße
NeisRevert (2026-04-11 12:33:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/181187275
where the comment is: "Undo Löschung Privatwege"
whymania (2026-04-13 10:12:56+00:00): Es ging nur um die zwei Abzweigungen, auch nur die hatte ich hier angefasst. Die Gerade entlang der Bahnstrecke ist öffentlich befahrbare Straße.
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-13 10:32:56+00:00): Danke, ist korrigiert.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181268740
Nekoatthegates (2026-04-10 17:12:14+00:00): Correction: Source used was Esri World Imagery(7.00; -8.00); Strava.
Syl (2026-04-10 18:04:42+00:00): Bonjour, merci pour ces corrections de sens uniques.
J'ai ajouté les exceptions au sens unique de la place Fourneyron dont vous parliez en commentaire et j'ai supprimé les 4 relations que vous aviez créé car elles n'apportaient pas d'informations supplémentaires. Ici les informations des interdictions sont déjà présentes directement sur les routes.
N'hésitez pas si vous avez des questions.
Bonne soirée.
NeisAgent (2026-04-10 22:33:37+00:00): 🕵 The changeset tags appear to reference Google as a data source.

Please note that using Google Maps, Google Street View, or similar Google services as a mapping source is not allowed in OpenStreetMap due to license restrictions.

More information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google

If the data in this changeset was derived from Google or another incompatible source, the edits may need to be reverted.

If this is a misunderstanding and the data was collected from permitted sources (e.g. local survey, Bing imagery, local knowledge, etc.), please clarify in a reply.
旧加卷 (2026-04-11 22:27:29+00:00): Hi 的定值（𪚥𪚥𪚥）：
福建省三明市尤溪县坂面镇正山村并无一所名为“和美国小”的学校。
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-04-22 17:41:34+00:00): Czemu szlaban został skasowany w tej edycji?
MZPL (2026-05-14 15:12:17+00:00): Jak dla mnie to do reverta jest
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-05-16 07:38:32+00:00): revert in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182726953
iandees (2026-04-10 17:44:31+00:00): Hello! I noticed that nodes https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1041320071, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2486688616 were moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181160845, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
SekeRob (2026-04-10 17:06:13+00:00): OK, resolved... the natural=wood tag was also on the forest outline way. Now it renders correctly.
rskedgell (2026-06-05 06:51:08+00:00): Adding non-existent crossings while neglecting the ones which actually exist is *really* unhelpful to actual pedestrians who experience the physical reality of London, rather than an abstraction on a distant computer screen.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5326913
rskedgell (2026-06-05 06:56:28+00:00): Crossings at Lowndes Street / Pont Street / Chesham Place junction fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183678288 - although I doubt that was the only problem with this changeset.
sgopal (2026-06-05 11:08:33+00:00): Thank you for your edits and for highlighting this issue. We appreciate the detailed explanation and understand the concern that incorrectly mapped crossings can have a real impact on pedestrians who rely on OSM data. it's very helpful!. We want to provide some context: the OSM community had flagged few issues about 2 months ago, and since then we've been actively working on revising our internal processes. The edits in question predate that period, so they reflect our older approach. Going forward, we will take extra care when mapping pedestrian crossings and will ensure our edits follow OSM guidelines and reflect on-the-ground conditions as accurately as possible. We appreciate your patience and continued feedback.
Thanks & Regards
sgopal
AlexUsanov (2026-04-10 17:07:50+00:00): To Do: add building numbers.
mos_next_door (2026-04-10 19:23:31+00:00): name= of a British entity should be in English. Reverted: https://osm.org/changeset/181165243
felipeeugenio (2026-04-10 21:16:20+00:00): Hola. Qué significa la terminación 4-3 en el nombre?
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181159408
matostoi (2026-04-10 21:25:00+00:00): Hola! Significa que en esa sección se encuentran las hijuelas 4 y 3. Así es como aparece en Google Maps y, pese a que me parece un poco inconsistente, lo dejé igual para evitar la confusión de tener un callejón con forma de F, todo con el mismo nombre.
felipeeugenio (2026-04-10 21:29:00+00:00): Ok, gracias por la respuesta.
Por favor nunca usar google maps como referencia de nada (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Copyright)
La calle se llama como se llama, las direcciones de los predios a los que accede son otro tema (addr:street + addr:housenumber/addr:unit)

Saludos
literan (2026-04-11 09:31:22+00:00): Здравствуйте. Зачем вы это сделали? имя реки наносится именно на ее линию. Откачу

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:waterway=river
user_22629719 (2026-04-13 20:13:05+00:00): Здравствуйте. А разве он не дублируется с отношением https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15896662?
literan (2026-04-15 19:43:13+00:00): вообще дублируется, но я не готов отвечать за эти отношения. Всю жизнь ставились названия на линиях реки, все рендеры поддерживают это. Потом кто-то придумал формировать эти отношения, где-то их сделали. Возможно, линия и отношение означают разные сущности. 

Будете ли оставлять name на отношении - мне все равно, главное, чтоб имя было там, где ему положено быть - на линиях реки.
Frans S (2026-04-16 12:58:11+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
There is no need to map highways ending somewhere in the woods/bush without connecting something.
Best regards
iandees (2026-04-10 17:44:32+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3067632873 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181160848, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
thopf (2026-04-14 20:59:04+00:00): Hallo!

In der OpenStreetMap werden reale Objekte kartiert, keine fiktiven. Für Übungszwecke verwende bitte UMap https://umap.openstreetmap.de/de/map/new/#11/47.119438/15.434418, in der die selbst Vektorgrafiken für eigene Projekte zeichnen kannst und lösche bitte das Objekt aus der Karte.

Danke!

LG.
DerKaiserschmarren (2026-04-15 08:59:50+00:00): Es wäre auch gut, wenn du die Person, die diese Aufgabe aufgegeben hat darauf hinweist, dass fiktive Einträge nicht in diese Datenbank gehören ;)

Danke dir!