piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2024-04-21 09:34:04+00:00): Hello Farsida, thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.Please see https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 

Thanks!

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
tekim (2024-04-13 00:16:33+00:00): reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149932604
Uanraf (2024-08-28 16:51:03+00:00): Las calles de acceso a un aparcamiento se cartografian como una linea con el tag highway:service + service:parking_aisle.

Para que una pista se aprecie en una plaza o parque se tiene que crear una relación de multipolígono.

Aunque se hizo mucho en anterioridad, los parques, plazas etc no deben terminarse en la calle. Se terminan donde termina su extension.
tekim (2024-04-13 00:15:55+00:00): reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149932598
tekim (2024-04-13 00:15:17+00:00): reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149932591
tekim (2024-04-13 00:14:50+00:00): reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149932588
NeisBot (2024-04-24 20:34:04+00:00): Hello Ygmr01, thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.Please see https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 

Thanks!

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
tekim (2024-04-13 00:14:23+00:00): reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149932585
tekim (2024-04-12 21:49:59+00:00): Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.  Thanks for your edit to the map.  Unfortunately, when editing OpenStreetMap we are not allowed to use Google Maps due to Google's Terms of use.
tekim (2024-04-12 21:50:50+00:00): reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149930251
tekim (2024-04-12 21:52:44+00:00): Also, the name tag in OpenStreetMap is only for the name of a feature, not a description like Lojas
tekim (2024-04-13 21:37:31+00:00): Hello, Thanks for your edit to the map.  Unfortunately, we are not allowed to use Yelp when editing OpenStreetMap due to Yelp's terms of service which state in part: "you will not...Modify, adapt, appropriate, reproduce, distribute, translate, create derivative works or adaptations of, publicly display, sell, trade, or in any way exploit the Service or Service Content (other than Your Content), except as expressly authorized by Yelp;"

Also, when deleting a business that has closed, you should leave the address.
tekim (2024-04-13 21:37:55+00:00): reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149970604
Glassman (2024-04-12 22:02:13+00:00): Why is this a private road? It looks like it belongs to the county.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149929182
KKaur (2024-04-12 22:09:24+00:00): The new speed limit sign put on this road shows it as a private road. This is used by PNNL vehicles.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149929182
Glassman (2024-04-12 23:02:27+00:00): Interesting. Is it restricted to only PNNL vehicles? Private could mean that it's privately owned but not restricted. In which case the appropriate tag could be ownership=private. or more specifically ownership=DOE
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149929182
mueschel (2024-04-13 17:18:48+00:00): Hi,
could you check this way? It got some strange 'designation' tags that look like 'destination'.
ZeljkoBG (2024-04-13 17:59:55+00:00): Hi mueschel, it's a bit complicated to explain but... I marked the change as 'Proba or Test'. The map of Serbia is in Cyrillic and Latin. When we use the GPS app 'destination', TTS reads the same destination twice (Niš/Ниш). In destination:lang:sr and destination:lang:sr-Latn we solve this problem. There are a few such places. The OSM Serbia community knows about these places and everyone can test the route with OsmAnd Live.  'designation:lang:sr-Latn' It's a test for Magic Earth. At the beginning of May I delete and everything will be fine. Say hello to Kokanović.
mueschel (2024-04-13 18:06:47+00:00): I'm completely fine with the :lang:sr and :lang:sr-Latn tags. 

But the term "designation" has a completely different meaning in OSM
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Adesignation
ZeljkoBG (2024-04-13 18:17:45+00:00): I know. This is just a test for the Magic Earth app. If it bothers you and you can't wait until the beginning of May when I will delete it. Then I'll delete in half a second.
ZeljkoBG (2024-04-13 18:19:56+00:00): Can I keep it until May?
MxxCon (2024-04-13 06:14:44+00:00): Perhaps https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Local_names_(loc_name) is a more suitable tag for this?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149929415
Robin Zyx (2024-04-14 22:46:26+00:00): The name is the Clebourne, with an O. But for some reason there is a fair amount of published material naming it without an O, including Wikipedia. I was getting paranoid about it until  a couple days ago when I ran across about an actual blog post discussing the matter, along with listing some famous or semi-famous people who liver here. I added the note to the entry for the next person who comes along confused as I was. Conceivably I could have skipped adding the alt_name tag.

I'm debating whether I should also go fix the Wikipedia entry.
MxxCon (2024-04-14 22:54:15+00:00): In that case there's also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:not:name
Robin Zyx (2024-04-15 00:19:22+00:00): Oy. I cannot keep track of all the OSM attribute tags and their permutations.
MxxCon (2024-04-15 00:22:12+00:00): I'm not blaming you 🙂
bxl-forever (2024-04-12 21:45:53+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM.

It is advised to *not* upload edits made on distant locations at the same time.

You want to edit buildings in England and in Australia? Fine, but please finish your edits for one country, and *then* upload them to the database. And only when this is done, start editing the other place.

One upload = one changeset = one bounding box in OSM. The size of that bounding box is determined by the min/max longitude and latitude of the objects in it.

The edit you uploaded right now spans over a huge territory, covering about half of the planet. This is unnecessarily annoying to mappers reviewing changes in their own country.

Have a nice day.

Some documentation here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
Szymson (2024-04-13 15:19:40+00:00): A co z dojazdem do portu?
theDM (2024-04-13 15:26:25+00:00): Skoro to nie jest droga wojewódzka, to od Dworcowej do Kuracyjnej powinien zniknąć numer 216.
Tu pojawia się problem, bo wg mapy ze strony ZDW Steyera jest DW i Szymson ma rację. Z drugiej strony długość DW 216 to 56.7 km i pokrywa się to pikietażowo z obecnym końcem secondary.
Inna sprawa, że kategoria drogi sztywno nie oznacza jej urzędowego statusu.
Pytanie za 200 pkt. - gdzie rzeczywiście kończy się DW 216, bo co źródło inne informacje?
maraf24 (2024-04-14 13:52:29+00:00): Uzgodniłeś to ze społecznością?
user_8023523 (2024-04-14 21:58:12+00:00): tak , uzgadniałem, ale powiedz mi proszę , to nie jest sprawa sądowa, że głosujemy na tak i nie i kto da więcej taka droga będzie , należy prawidłowo oznaczać drogi, nie od dziś wiadomo , że jest to druga najważniejsza droga w Łodzi , zaraz po Włókniarzy , bo jest to trasa WZ , ma ogromny przepust , łączy WIDZEW-RETKINIA
maraf24 (2024-04-15 08:18:38+00:00): Nie, nie uzgodniłeś tego. Wprowadzasz samowolnie zmiany i nie interesuje Cię zdanie społeczności.
Dawid2849 (2024-05-01 08:17:08+00:00): Wycofałem

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150738108
muralito (2024-04-13 01:25:52+00:00): Hola. Esos tramos que de ruta 6 que etiquetaste como secondary, ¿pasaron a ser jurisdiccion nacional? si siguen siendo deparamental como eran hasta hace poco van como tertiary.
nicobd29 (2024-04-13 02:27:40+00:00): Hola si, te adjunto la resolución. https://medios.presidencia.gub.uy/legal/2023/resoluciones/02/mtop_1165.pdf
ZLima12 (2024-07-06 18:10:28+00:00): Hi there,

It looks like you named several woods "Saw Mill River Parkway Lands". Is this name sourced from anywhere, or did you create it yourself? If it's the latter, I believe it would be better to provide no name value at all, following the "on the ground" rule.
KindredCoda (2024-07-06 18:12:39+00:00): I did not name this, I only cleared some of the trees away for the parkway.
ZLima12 (2024-07-06 18:44:39+00:00): Ah, I see now that I looked at OSMCha. Sorry to bother you.
HellMap (2024-04-13 13:58:29+00:00): Čau. A kurš plugins tas ir? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/PolygonCutOut? Kā tu panāci, lai tas izgrieztu ar atkāpi no līnijas? Vai arī tur pa vidu vēl soļi bija.
felipeeugenio (2024-04-13 12:49:07+00:00): Hola. Por favor no agregar addr:street a las plazas. Ya ha sido objeto de debate en la comunidad y ha generado algo de controversia. 

Saludos
matarranyacorrector (2024-04-13 19:38:08+00:00): Porque es la lengua propia, local, de la zona. La wiki de OSM afirma que es preferible usar esa. Además, la misma página web de uno de los ayuntamientos de la zona (de Peñarroya de Tastavins) afirma que en el Matarraña y en el Bajo Cinca se habla más catalán de forma habitual según un estudio del Instituto Aragonés de Estadística: https://www.peñarroyadetastavins.es/el-pueblo-2/nuestra-lengua/
marczoutendijk (2024-04-16 14:07:31+00:00): Hi Paul,

The DWG received complaints about your deletion of "unnamed" residential areas.
Such an area does not have to have a name, so why did you delete them?
Info is here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dresidential

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
Paul B Powers (2024-04-16 17:24:26+00:00): There is no obvious tie to actual residential areas, in some cases. I saw individual buildings marked as that area, as well as plots of property in rural areas without any housing on it marked the same. The marking seems to be overused in and not following the idea of what a residential area is. And es, I definitely didn't fully follow what I just said as well. Much that I removed seemed extraneous, considering the actual area. I live here in this area, and much has no logical reason to be marked as such.
marczoutendijk (2024-04-17 14:40:52+00:00): Russell720 restored one of those involved areas.
Please get in contact with each other to solve this situation.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150059522

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
marczoutendijk (2024-04-16 14:06:39+00:00): Hi Paul,

The DWG received complaints about your deletion of "unnamed" residential areas.
Such an area does not have to have a name, so why did you delete them?
Info is here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dresidential

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
marczoutendijk (2024-04-16 14:06:21+00:00): Hi Paul,

The DWG received complaints about your deletion of "unnamed" residential areas.
Such an area does not have to have a name, so why did you delete them?
Info is here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dresidential

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-16 18:10:57+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1272112409/history - czy w tym momencie jest tu jakakolwiek budowa?
puchaczowsky (2024-04-17 15:25:59+00:00): użytkownik dostał już blokadę na tym i innym koncie, mapował planowane obiekty na które nawet nie jest gotowy projekt

do wycofania moim zdaniem
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-17 15:36:25+00:00): to do kosza, próba sprzątania w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150135722

jakie inne konto było?
warto przejrzeć inne edycje co jeszcze fikcyjnego dodane zostało
puchaczowsky (2024-04-17 16:36:29+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/twojStaryXXX
marczoutendijk (2024-04-16 14:06:12+00:00): Hi Paul,

The DWG received complaints about your deletion of "unnamed" residential areas.
Such an area does not have to have a name, so why did you delete them?
Info is here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dresidential

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
marczoutendijk (2024-04-16 14:06:01+00:00): Hi Paul,

The DWG received complaints about your deletion of "unnamed" residential areas.
Such an area does not have to have a name, so why did you delete them?
Info is here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dresidential

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
aighes (2026-07-19 11:56:52+00:00): I know it has been a while, but why do you added access=customers? AFAIK this car park is open to everyone. You go there, park your car, pay a fee and leave again. It's not like you need to be a customer of like Delta to be allowed to park there.
lmum (2026-07-19 13:13:08+00:00): You're right, bad tag. Please update!
mikimapbuilder (2024-04-15 06:38:32+00:00): Removed descriptive name
CurlingMan13 (2024-04-13 04:21:30+00:00): Why did you just delete all these areas?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149933043
tastrax (2024-04-13 08:28:23+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features 

To get the + symbol on a mobile device numeric keypad I reckon you will need to do a LONG press on the zero.
I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
LaserSquirrel (2024-04-13 01:41:25+00:00): Comment somehow copied from previous change. Actual MR: https://maproulette.org/browse/challenges/40090
LaserSquirrel (2024-04-13 01:42:08+00:00): And actual change: Moved Wikidata/Wikipedia to secondary brand: links
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-02 17:27:15+00:00): Hello! Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11812990289/history maybe simply a bicycle parking?
Krystyna K (2024-05-02 21:27:39+00:00): Hello Thank you for your feedback. This structure serves as a storage facility. You are welcome to bring your bike and mountain bike, but please note that bikes are not in suitable condition for riding.
monhiko (2024-04-13 02:26:41+00:00): 你好，我注意到这一带的山在昨天晚上突然被绘制出来，今天又被突然删去，请问这一带的山是真实存在的吗？如果真实存在，请避免大范围删除，避免被OSM管理员误判为故意破坏地图哦！
Koalaman (2024-04-13 04:44:26+00:00): Hi, 
It was an accident. The area was not deleted, but disappeared due slight overlap of two inner areas. I have fixed the error, so the area should reappear now. Sorry for the confusion!
Lycanroc (2024-04-13 03:52:58+00:00): Street names from:
https://www.nps.gov/lake/planyourvisit/maps.htm
CurlingMan13 (2024-04-13 04:34:04+00:00): Please use "Q" to square up the buildings and give them 90 degree angles.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149933896
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-28 17:52:50+00:00): Hello!

You used
healthcare:speciality=generaln
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9017817258/history

Have you maybe meant
healthcare:speciality=general
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
woodpeck (2024-04-13 19:18:19+00:00): Hi there, in this changeset you deleted a large part of the Manihi coastline, and another mapper had to repair the damage. Please be more careful - if you want to improve the coastline it is often better to modify the existing data rather than delete it and attempt to re-create.
Lycanroc (2024-04-13 03:52:34+00:00): https://www.nps.gov/lake/planyourvisit/maps.htm
DressyPear4 (2024-04-13 10:38:15+00:00): Não faça testes no mapa, talvez o https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/pt-br/
ou
https://osmand.net/docs/user/plan-route/create-route/
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149934639
rskedgell (2024-04-13 06:10:19+00:00): As far as I can tell from Bing aerial imagery, the gate still exists.

The problem here is the separate sidewalks added by @alisonlung. They were added by a user with a task manager determined to "complete" sidewalks in a map square. Unfortunately, they made no effort whatsoever to connect the sidewalks via crossings or do anything else beneficial for routing. I'd be inclined to delete the sidewalks and reinstate the gate.
emersonveenstra (2024-04-15 11:29:38+00:00): Hi there,

I'm not sure that https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/126424942 is a crossing, because it doesn't cross anything. I see there's several like this around the area in recent days, could you maybe explain a bit more about why you think these are crossings?
Allison P (2024-04-15 13:34:10+00:00): I'm not sure how to tag these path segments that are only used for connections. I presumed that Rapid was following best practice. Looking back, it's probably not good to have a crossing node where you can only "cross" halfway.
emersonveenstra (2024-04-17 10:51:57+00:00): I think people are using https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Tag:footway%3Dlink for that
osmviborg (2024-04-13 07:21:35+00:00): Navnet er på omridset af broen. Det skal så ikke være på vejen. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1272150526
Sun Siaré (2024-04-20 03:15:30+00:00): S'il vous plait veuillez arrêter de changer les traits de cote.
osmviborg (2024-04-13 07:23:30+00:00): Bedre med https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:subject
antonr (2024-04-16 10:50:40+00:00): Og også:

subject:wikidata=Q692146
subject:wikipedia=da:Genforeningen i 1920

Der må være en større bunke memorials der fortjener tilsvarende...
citrula (2024-04-13 09:07:12+00:00): Welcome to OSM. Maybe I could help if you describe what needed to be fixed about the parking lot - in this edit you removed highway=service from one of the service roads, which isn't correct.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149936605
Syl (2024-05-08 09:06:32+00:00): Bonjour, le bâtiment de Grand Frais ne forme qu'un bloc, pourquoi l'avoir séparé en plusieurs bouts ?
barnes38 (2024-05-08 09:27:49+00:00): Bonjour Syl,
 je suis rentré dans le bâtiment, (j'ai fait la photo du plan de secours et d'évacuation), j'ai pu constater que la partie ouverte au public en tant que magasin (retail) Grand-Frais n'occupait qu'une partie, donc voilà. L'auter partie c'est une zone mixte de bureaux, de zones de stockage, de logistique, que j viens de caractériser en 'commercial', il faudrait découper encore plus fin éventuellement, en tout cas ce n'est pas  vraiment du retail
barnes38 (2024-05-08 09:30:34+00:00): Le découpage me semble bon, on pourrait faire ça sous forme de building:part sur cette base
Syl (2024-05-08 11:15:13+00:00): Merci pour ces précisions.
J'avais justement en tête l'utilisation de building:part pour cette situation.
Je m'en occuperais peut-être d'ici quelques mois si vous ne l'avez pas fait entre temps.
Syl (2024-05-09 18:41:44+00:00): Je me rends compte après réflexion qu'il y a eu une confusion entre la cartographie 3D des bâtiments (qui décrit leur nature et celui de ses différentes parties, quelque soit l'usage et qui est visible de l'extérieur) et la cartographie intérieure (qui décrit l'usage des différentes parties à l'intérieur, et qui peut nécessiter de rentrer à l'intérieur ou d'utiliser des plans d'évacuation). Il n'y donc pas à utiliser building:part mais à remettre le polygone de tout le bâtiment et d'utiliser les autres pour décrire l'intérieur.
Syl (2024-05-08 08:59:57+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai annulé le déplacement de Ange sur le bâtiment, il n'en occupe qu'une partie. Vous aviez vérifié sur place ?
barnes38 (2024-05-08 09:35:47+00:00): Je me suis basé sur le linéaire de façade, et effectué une projection sur le bâtiment, ça ne doit pas être loin de la réalité.
Après  si vous voulez faire mieux, en surfacique, pourquoi pas, et corriger dans le bon sens, ça serait peut être mieux que de défaire, mais  bon, je ne vous fait aucun reproche, juste une suggestion.  
Au contraire, je vous remercie pour votre vigilance et votre relecture
Syl (2024-05-08 11:24:12+00:00): Ça a peut-être changé depuis, la partie droite du bâtiment était clairement vide hier.
Je ne compte pas plus détailler ici. Je préfère prendre du temps à m'assurer que les données déjà là sont correctes et à jour plutôt que d'aller toujours plus dans les détails.
Au plaisir de se croiser à une rencontre sur Grenoble (pour le moment ça ne tombe jamais quand je viens par ici) ou fin juin à Lyon.
woodpeck (2024-04-13 19:20:40+00:00): Dear Garmin-User, it would be helpful if in addition to fixing broken stuff, you could occasionally also look into why things are broken, and message users accordingly. Otherwise they might not even know that they broke something! I did this now in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149934283
user_177389 (2024-04-13 20:17:20+00:00): Thank you very much!
user_177389 (2024-04-14 12:28:07+00:00): Apparently that wasn't successful.
tux67 (2024-04-13 08:23:39+00:00): Hi limes11,

access=no? d.h. noch nicht mal der Besitzer des Grundstücks darf da lang? Es gibt nur wenig Fälle bei denen ich mir access=no erklären könnte? Was ist denn da vor Ort zu sehen. Als Quelle sind ist im CS nur der automatische Hinweis zu Bing ...
Gruß
tux67
tux67 (2024-04-13 08:27:35+00:00): Entschuldige bitte .. wer lesen kann .. die Note die zu dem CS führte, habe ich gerade erst gesehen. Und das no kam nicht von dir ... 

Gruß und schönes WE
tux67
Taya_S (2024-04-13 15:14:10+00:00): Please use access=private if the access is private. Access=no means no one can use this path
Taya_S (2024-04-13 17:29:47+00:00): If you see a piece of highway inbetween 2 other access=private highways, then it is clear that only adding bicycle=no is not sufficient.
Taya_S (2024-04-13 17:34:34+00:00): In this changeset you dragged a highway node over a kilometre away. Please be more dilligent when editing the map. I have reverted this changeset

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149962378
VLD549 (2024-05-01 06:57:47+00:00): hi, could you provide a link that shows the KNP36/Startpunt Vasserheide name? I can't seem to verify it.

Thank you in advance!
usifusie (2024-05-01 16:29:21+00:00): I can sent you a picture if you sent me your e=mail
VLD549 (2024-05-24 08:19:04+00:00): roadedits+vld549@gmail.com

Thank you.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-10-06 09:08:23+00:00): What is the source?
ngry_pazuzu (2024-04-19 01:42:39+00:00): Where did you get the information that the Cypress bike route ends at Milton? There is a bicycle route sign on SW Marine Drive southbound just before Milton Street that says "SW Marine Ends". It doesn't say "Cypress Ends".
Taya_S (2024-04-13 15:12:59+00:00): Why did you add bicycle=no here? I'm pretty sure you are allowed to cycle here
Sören66 (2024-04-13 17:03:56+00:00): absolut unposible to ride there now, the wind formed the sand to hills!
Taya_S (2024-04-13 17:25:43+00:00): Access tags are only to be used for legal access. Unless there is a sign prohibiting cyclists from cycling ehre it should not be tagged as bicycle=no
Taya_S (2024-04-13 17:27:24+00:00): reverted incorrectly added access tags

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149962095
Firefishy (2024-04-24 11:33:57+00:00): Awesome! Thank you. Local knowledge is best. Happy mapping.