piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
CoyKoi (2023-12-18 04:33:46+00:00): Hi WoedEel, this is the second time you've made this change here. Can you please explain why you are doing this? You did not respond to the previous discussion at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140414606
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144914120
osmuser63783 (2024-02-03 14:25:59+00:00): Hi
I've noticed there are now quite a few island nodes on the map with name = "Banks Island".
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1GQM
For example
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11403743851
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11419607063
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11416514405

Do you agree that these are redundant and should be removed? Since the island is already tagged as https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5345940
osmuser63783 (2024-02-03 14:28:06+00:00): Also for Victoria island: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1GQO
Supaplex (2023-12-09 14:21:43+00:00): 建築物可以不用加layer=1
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144914651
aTarom (2023-12-09 07:46:26+00:00): Cuando puedas revisa este name, "Antiguo potro de herrar de {{cOLLADO}}"
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1229744964/history
no lo corrijo por que parece más adecuado para "description", gracias por aportar conocimiento local saludos
Arturo Francisco Barbero (2023-12-09 08:30:01+00:00): Se me debió de quedar el bloq mayúsculas activado sin que me diera cuenta
Frans S (2023-12-10 13:06:48+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)

non squared buildings.
collected multiple buildings and mapped them as 1 building.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144914971
Molandfreak (2025-11-18 04:49:39+00:00): Thanks a lot for adding these townships!
NorthCrab_upload (2023-12-08 19:40:28+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2185586235
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/222754497

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Tatfahren (2023-12-08 19:35:30+00:00): review_requested=no ; da bin ich versehentlich drauf gekommen.
jcr83 (2024-04-08 22:05:19+00:00): Bonjour,
Est-ce bien l'avion Piper PA 28-161 « Cadet » immatriculé F-GIBQ ?
Aonikenk (2026-02-25 08:55:25+00:00): je n'ai pas vu l'immatriculation sur l'épave. mais c'est possible. Je vois que depuis, cette épave a été tagguée Rockwell 114 qui correspondrait plus à l'épave au sud du Puy de Tourrette.
jcr83 (2026-02-25 22:00:32+00:00): J'essaierai d'aller voir sur place prochainement. En attendant, j'ai supprimé le nom et l'immatriculation.
Matt_ (2023-12-08 19:59:51+00:00): WW could be waste water OR water works, can't tell
NorthCrab_upload (2023-12-08 20:10:30+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2185583965
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/222754332

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2023-12-08 20:20:46+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11403909382
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11403909386

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
flohoff (2023-12-10 11:58:21+00:00): Hi,
du hast hier eine Fußgängerampel als 2 PKW Ampeln eingetragen. Das führt zu massivem Penalty im Routing.

Eine Fußgängerampel die eine reine Anforderungsampel ausgelegt ist so wie hier sollte nur als highway=crossing+crossing=traffic_signals anleget werden.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9309006712

So long

Flo
chris66 (2023-12-11 08:51:48+00:00): Hi, die Ampel hat User "nurdafur" eingetragen.

Der Trend geht leider dahin, auch Crossing-Ampeln als "normale" Ampeln einzutragen.

Die Penality kann vermindert werden durch:

* traffic_signals:direction - die Ampel wirkt nur in einer Richtung, Penalty wird halbiert

* button_operated =yes - Anforderungsampeln sollten ebenfalls eine geringe Penalty bekommen.

bye
flohoff (2023-12-11 09:07:21+00:00): Ja - Wir müssen den Bullshit ja nicht mitmachen und weiter befördern. Und das penalty ist da und macht das routing kaputt. Und das mit der der direction ist leider meine ich aktuell nur in OSRM supported. 

Flo
jeslop (2024-01-10 18:24:37+00:00): Revertido en el conjunto de cambios

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146114367
GeoAndi (2023-12-08 20:23:24+00:00): Fortführung Changeset-Comment: war genau so (Straßentyp mit diesen Eigeschaften) bereits am Föhrenweg gemapppt (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/10870619)
user_12500175 (2023-12-15 13:44:07+00:00): Hallo,
den Namen am besten ganz entfernen.
Name bedeuted dass das Gebäude einen eigenen, officiellen  Namen hat
Friendly_Ghost (2024-04-09 15:00:31+00:00): Hi nyoma,

Why did you make a copy of Ashkam Airport (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1042100984) and named it "closed", and why are you mapping closed aerodromes all over South Africa?
h551w (2023-12-08 20:30:42+00:00): Whoops, forgot to tag Bing aerial imagery as a source
BCNorwich (2023-12-09 08:01:35+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've removed the section of path that was on top of the service road and amended the service road tags to suit the public footpath.

Regards Bernard.
michael_ua (2023-12-09 10:07:01+00:00): Цей ЖК північніше, виправте
user_5359 (2023-12-09 10:23:54+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/11403961656. What ist the mean of the key Maintainer? Did you mean operator?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-06 10:07:03+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/402438943/history - surface=5 ?

was it supposed to be lanes=5 ?
silversurfer83 (2023-12-09 08:02:38+00:00): Moin :)

die beiden Friedhöfe sind schon länger als Fläche erfasst. Daher sind die Punkte leider unnötige Doppelerfassung, die ich wieder raus genommen habe. 

cheers
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144918329
NorthCrab_upload (2023-12-08 21:30:49+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.

"Sowiogórska":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11403973175
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11403973176
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11403973177
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11403973178
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11403973179

"Pogodna":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11403973188
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11403973189
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11403973190
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11403973191
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11404089807
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11404089808
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11404089809

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
citrula (2023-12-08 22:49:10+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Thank you for making the effort to contribute and improve the map. The service road should be continuous through the parking lot rather than disconnected at either end. Happy mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144918500
MxxCon (2023-12-09 04:36:44+00:00): Hello.
You mapped "Vince Lombardi Park & Ride" bus stop as both a node and a building. However, that goes against https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element guideline. This should be corrected.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144918645
Rainero (2024-01-30 20:47:56+00:00): Reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/142062126

Pic4Review mission 2648 sets wrong tags and uses outdated mapillary pictures.
PlayGuide (2023-12-31 11:52:12+00:00): Bonjour, dans la mise à jour de l'aire de jeux way/1229781149, le tag leisure=playground a disparu, pourriez vous le remettre ? Merci
gosgtan (2023-12-31 12:42:26+00:00): Bonjour, c'est fait
PlayGuide (2023-12-31 16:02:53+00:00): Parfait, merci !
jeslop (2023-12-08 22:20:20+00:00): Hola  ig5map. 

Estas ediciones que estás haciendo no son correctas. En primer lugar carecen de fuente para los cambios que realizasa en las mismas. 

Los comentarios a los conjuntos de cambios tampoco siguen las normas de la comunidad: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenos_comentarios_en_conjuntos_de_cambios. 

Las meras traducciones que no existen sobre el terreno tampoco son adecuadas y tampoco las trasliteraciones. Por favor, contacta con la comunidad local antes de seguir con estas ediciones.

Saludos

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
mp747474 (2024-02-13 13:16:11+00:00): Hallo, hier gab es wohl eine Adressverwechslung. Die Bäckerei und die Fahrschule liegen am Hausener Weg 37/39 (weiter nordöstlich), nicht an der Thudichumstraße 37/39 (dort sind nur Wohnhäuser). Am richtigen Ort sind beide POIs schon seit langem vorhanden, daher habe ich die Einträge gelöscht: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147408770
Noktoborus (2023-12-08 22:33:41+00:00): Подробности дискуссии в https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144919727
Noktoborus (2023-12-08 23:12:01+00:00): корректная ссылка на дискуссию: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144910954
Noktoborus (2023-12-08 23:12:48+00:00): Ещё более корректная ссылка на дискуссию:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144911038
YomanNH (2023-12-19 07:13:39+00:00): Cześć,
ciągi pieszo-rowerowe to highway=path, a nie highway=cycleway. Przywróciłem prawidłowe tagowanie.
ftrebien (2023-12-10 11:31:22+00:00): For clarity, I meant "designation" instead of toponym and "toponym" instead of name.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-12-20 14:53:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145334833 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed mechanical edit.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15466 .  I said I'd hold off a revert if it was discussed publicly, but that did not happen
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-12-20 14:53:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145334833 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed mechanical edit.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15466 .  I said I'd hold off a revert if it was discussed publicly, but that did not happen
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-12-20 14:53:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145334833 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed mechanical edit.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15466 .  I said I'd hold off a revert if it was discussed publicly, but that did not happen
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-12-20 14:53:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145334833 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed mechanical edit.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15466 .  I said I'd hold off a revert if it was discussed publicly, but that did not happen
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-12-20 14:53:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145334833 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed mechanical edit.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15466 .  I said I'd hold off a revert if it was discussed publicly, but that did not happen
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-12-20 14:53:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145334833 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed mechanical edit.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15466 .  I said I'd hold off a revert if it was discussed publicly, but that did not happen
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-12-20 14:53:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145334833 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed mechanical edit.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15466 .  I said I'd hold off a revert if it was discussed publicly, but that did not happen
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-12-20 14:53:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145334833 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed mechanical edit.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15466 .  I said I'd hold off a revert if it was discussed publicly, but that did not happen
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-12-20 14:53:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145334833 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed mechanical edit.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15466 .  I said I'd hold off a revert if it was discussed publicly, but that did not happen
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-12-20 14:53:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145334833 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed mechanical edit.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15466 .  I said I'd hold off a revert if it was discussed publicly, but that did not happen
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-12-20 14:53:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145334833 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed mechanical edit.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15466 .  I said I'd hold off a revert if it was discussed publicly, but that did not happen
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-12-20 14:53:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145334833 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed mechanical edit.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15466 .  I said I'd hold off a revert if it was discussed publicly, but that did not happen
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-12-20 14:53:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145334833 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed mechanical edit.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15466 .  I said I'd hold off a revert if it was discussed publicly, but that did not happen
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-12-20 14:52:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145334833 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed mechanical edit.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15466 .  I said I'd hold off a revert if it was discussed publicly, but that did not happen
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-12-20 14:53:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145334833 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed mechanical edit.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15466 .  I said I'd hold off a revert if it was discussed publicly, but that did not happen
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-12-20 14:53:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145334833 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed mechanical edit.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15466 .  I said I'd hold off a revert if it was discussed publicly, but that did not happen
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-12-20 14:53:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145334833 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed mechanical edit.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15466 .  I said I'd hold off a revert if it was discussed publicly, but that did not happen
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-12-20 14:53:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145334833 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed mechanical edit.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15466 .  I said I'd hold off a revert if it was discussed publicly, but that did not happen
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-12-20 14:53:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145334833 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed mechanical edit.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15466 .  I said I'd hold off a revert if it was discussed publicly, but that did not happen
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-12-20 14:53:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145334833 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed mechanical edit.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15466 .  I said I'd hold off a revert if it was discussed publicly, but that did not happen
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-12-20 14:53:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145334833 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed mechanical edit.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15466 .  I said I'd hold off a revert if it was discussed publicly, but that did not happen
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-12-20 14:53:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145334833 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed mechanical edit.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15466 .  I said I'd hold off a revert if it was discussed publicly, but that did not happen
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-12-20 14:53:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145334833 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed mechanical edit.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15466 .  I said I'd hold off a revert if it was discussed publicly, but that did not happen
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-12-20 14:53:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145334833 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed mechanical edit.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15466 .  I said I'd hold off a revert if it was discussed publicly, but that did not happen
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-12-20 14:53:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145334833 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed mechanical edit.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15466 .  I said I'd hold off a revert if it was discussed publicly, but that did not happen
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-12-20 14:53:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145334833 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed mechanical edit.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15466 .  I said I'd hold off a revert if it was discussed publicly, but that did not happen
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-12-20 14:53:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145334833 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed mechanical edit.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15466 .  I said I'd hold off a revert if it was discussed publicly, but that did not happen
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-12-20 14:53:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145334833 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed mechanical edit.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15466 .  I said I'd hold off a revert if it was discussed publicly, but that did not happen
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-12-20 14:53:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145334833 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed mechanical edit.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15466 .  I said I'd hold off a revert if it was discussed publicly, but that did not happen
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-12-20 14:53:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145334833 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed mechanical edit.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15466 .  I said I'd hold off a revert if it was discussed publicly, but that did not happen
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-12-20 14:53:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145334833 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed mechanical edit.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15466 .  I said I'd hold off a revert if it was discussed publicly, but that did not happen
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-12-20 14:53:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145334833 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed mechanical edit.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15466 .  I said I'd hold off a revert if it was discussed publicly, but that did not happen
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-12-20 14:53:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145334833 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed mechanical edit.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15466 .  I said I'd hold off a revert if it was discussed publicly, but that did not happen
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-12-20 14:53:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145334833 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed mechanical edit.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15466 .  I said I'd hold off a revert if it was discussed publicly, but that did not happen
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-12-20 14:53:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145334833 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed mechanical edit.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15466 .  I said I'd hold off a revert if it was discussed publicly, but that did not happen
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-12-20 14:52:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145334833 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed mechanical edit.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15466 .  I said I'd hold off a revert if it was discussed publicly, but that did not happen
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-12-20 14:53:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145334833 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed mechanical edit.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15466 .  I said I'd hold off a revert if it was discussed publicly, but that did not happen