piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NaufalFarras (2026-06-04 20:30:59+00:00): Halo!

Atas dasar apakah jalan raya antara Jeruksawit-Plupuh-Tanon-Mondokan dan Karangwaru-Gemolong diklasifikasikan sebagai highway=primary? Jalan Solo-Purwodadi telah diakomodasi oleh jalan primary via Kalijambe. Jalan Sragen-Purwodadi juga telah diakomodasi oleh jalan primary via Lingkar Sragen-Sumberlawang. Oleh karena itu, klasifikasi primary pada jalan ini redundan.

Jika Anda beralasan bahwa jalan ini tergolong sebagai jalan kolektor, ada empat tingkatan jalan kolektor. Berdasarkan diskusi kami di Telegram dan diskusi bulanan Perkumpulan OpenStreetMap Indonesia, hanya JKP-2 dan JKP-3 yang bisa dimasukkan ke dalam highway=primary. JKP-1 sudah masuk ke dalam highway=trunk, sementara JKP-4 hanya highway=secondary karena hanya menghubungkan ke kecamatan. Hal ini telah terdokumentasikan di OSM Wiki, salah satunya di halaman id:Jalan.

Saya mengerti jika klasifikasi dapat bersifat subjektif. Oleh karena itu, perlu adanya patokan dalam menentukannya. Seperti yang saya tulis di atas, OSM Wiki telah menginformasikan patokannya dengan berdasarkan pada klasifikasi pemerintah, dengan mempertimbangkan beberapa hal lainnya. Dalam hal ini, jalan yang Anda ubah menjadi highway=primary tidak termasuk dalam JKP-2 maupun -3. Saya menduga jalan ini masuk ke dalam JKP-4 atau bahkan Lokal Primer. Jalan ini juga bukan jalan perkotaan yang menjadi dasar penandaan highway=primary. Oleh karena itu, jalan ini menurut saya perlu diubah kembali menjadi highway=secondary.

Terlepas dari changeset ini, saya juga menemukan banyak suntingan Anda mengubah klasifikasi lainnya menjadi primary. Saya akan membahas tersebut lain kali saja.
nevw (2026-04-07 23:38:17+00:00): Hi, multipolygons are not valid for the pedestrian area
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.08010&lat=-37.70468&zoom=19
You probably need to use simple polygons in this case.
Multipolygons outers cannot share sides. You might need to read the wiki on multipolygon relations if you want to use them.
lacissomewhere (2026-04-08 13:58:43+00:00): Thanks for pointing this out! I read up on multipolygons and tried fixing it so hopefully it's cool now.
JeroenHoek (2026-04-06 08:17:09+00:00): Source=Google Gemini??

Are you serious?
NeisBot (2026-04-06 07:21:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13710489125 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Fishing Charter Dock"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-14 10:33:20+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181315510
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
eggie (2026-04-06 10:03:32+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-04-06 07:36:54+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Mateicoti (2026-04-22 06:36:30+00:00): Facultatea s-a mutat intr-o noua locatie. In cladirea de birouri PoliTower care este langa lujerului. In locul ei a venit Facultatea de Istorie din cauza renovatiilor. Ai putea sa o pui pe ea aici pana cand se iese din santier.
Teo Cata (2026-05-28 07:19:27+00:00): Am înțeles. Mersi pentru explicații.
A67-A67 (2026-04-07 11:15:45+00:00): In deze wijziging gaat een correcte turn-restriction kapot. Deze turn-restriction heeft niets te maken met de richting Meibergdreef - A9.

Ik zal deze wijziging terugdraaien.
chrischtili (2026-04-06 08:47:08+00:00): yeah..mistake..source is of course website
Supaplex (2026-04-06 15:49:36+00:00): 待補Wikidata項目，目前中文維基百科連結未連結到Wikidata
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180928503
AndyB_66 (2026-04-07 11:37:22+00:00): Takie zmiany należy przedyskutować ze społecznością OSM przed edycją. Wycofuję - tym bardziej, że tymczasowe zamknięcie odcinak drogi to nie powód do zmiany jej kategorii w szerszym zakresie.
gebux (2026-04-06 07:58:52+00:00): Did you hike there?
maicolgalante (2026-04-06 08:05:25+00:00): Sure, 2 days ago ;) No problem finding the route. And you?
I also added the missing trail between Stavolo Rosean and Cuel da le Fratte.
gebux (2026-04-06 08:18:20+00:00): I was there. Trail easy to find in the steep Part, nothing that
gebux (2026-04-06 08:19:42+00:00): ... I would map as a 'somewhat visible' trail above that. Just grass and fallen trees. But lets leave it at that, maybe now a trail will develop.
maicolgalante (2026-04-06 08:30:39+00:00): Thanks for the feedback. I understand your point about visibility, but rather than having no trail, it's better to have a path with visibility=horrible or visibility=no for those who use those trails.

PS: For the Leale valley trails, that's a bigger and more specific issue... I saw you've restored them. That's fine, I'll leave it that way for now, but if you'd like, we can talk about it privately! 

See you soon and happy mapping!
NeisBot (2026-04-06 08:00:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13710572957 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Massage clinic"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-04-14 10:33:22+00:00): 🗑️ Element deleted by https://osm.org/changeset/181014573
osmviborg (2026-04-06 08:15:37+00:00): natural=wetland på et punkt er forkert, det er et område. I wikien se "Used on these elements" https://lgms.nl/p/osm/cached-wiki/?page=Tag:natural%3Dwetland
gungnir (2026-04-06 08:43:50+00:00): Fixed! I wasn't able to make a 1:1 fit with klimadatastyrelsen's map since the parts of Birkemose, Langemose and Kattemose that are still wetlands have changed quite a bit due to drainage.
eggie (2026-04-06 09:27:41+00:00): Dag Goofy,

Denk niet dat het klopt.
We zetten niet nogmaals adressen op de omtrek.. en dit is niet nr 1
Mvg
eggie
eggie (2026-04-06 09:48:09+00:00): Adres verwijderd
NeisBot (2026-04-06 08:18:46+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13710588108 v6

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Jewelry shop"
---
Zum Beispiel könnte eine neutralere und sachlichere Version deines Textes lauten: "Schmuckladen"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-14 10:33:28+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181315516
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
NeisBot (2026-04-06 08:21:48+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13710588108 v7

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Jewelry store"
---
Zum Beispiel könnte eine neutralere und sachlichere Version deines Textes lauten: "Schmuckladen"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-04-14 10:33:32+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/181062183
NeisBot (2026-04-06 08:21:52+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13710588108 v8

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Jewelry shop"
---
Zum Beispiel könnte eine neutralere und sachlichere Version deines Textes lauten: "Schmuckladen"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-04-14 10:33:35+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/181062183
j numminen (2026-04-06 08:20:51+00:00): Source was not survey but Aerial imagery.
ajmat (2026-04-07 09:59:21+00:00): Reverted in changeset id: 180988810
hatul (2026-04-30 14:42:14+00:00): בבקשה לא להעלות נקודות פרטיות למפה
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-04-16 01:29:04+00:00): Thanks for fixing this typo! I don't know how it slipped past me, LOL.
wavewings (2026-04-06 10:07:57+00:00): Nice, thanks!
habi (2026-04-07 07:14:44+00:00): Mersi!
TNNRTG (2026-04-06 08:58:47+00:00): !
TrickyFoxy (2026-05-11 23:00:55+00:00): К сожалению Яндекс.Карты для правок использовать нельзя
ajmat (2026-04-08 05:13:31+00:00): Reverted in changeset id: 181029784
Dillen GJ (2026-04-06 09:30:21+00:00): https://www.media.wocoapp.nl/maasdriel/7dc00a736d5a4332f5eca95080d25cf4 op blz 2 vermeld 5 WADI gebiedjes.
Hoe worden deze ingericht ?
Loopslol7 (2026-04-09 20:53:49+00:00): hey, I think the tag 

'seats:separated' is much more common.

separate_seats is used only 7 times.

whereas the other has almost 10K uses. 

They may actually just describe different map features however.

https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/separate_seats

https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/seats%3Aseparated
mueschel (2026-04-09 21:58:54+00:00): Hi,
you're right, 'seats:separated' is the documented tag.
When I edited, I changed your (new) tag to the closest one that already existed (removing the 'd'). But I obviously missed the actually correct one.
Feel free to change it to 'seats:separated',  or I can also do it in the next days.
Loopslol7 (2026-04-10 18:11:28+00:00): Thank you for your response!

I will change it back soon. Also, thank you for contributing to this area! More mappers around here would be fantastic.
NeisBot (2026-04-06 09:18:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/456771336 v5

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Apartment building"
---
Zum Beispiel könnte eine neutralere und sachlichere Version deines Textes lauten: "Wohngebäude"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
opendcc (2026-04-06 16:02:49+00:00): corrected
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-06 16:11:05+00:00): Danke @opendcc für die Korrektur.
Taya_S (2026-04-07 07:31:39+00:00): Hello TrumanBlurbank,

I've got a few question regarding this changeset.

1. Why did you delete those nodes? Do those addresses not exist at all anymore? Or is it just the shops that don't exist anymore?

2. Did you try to do conflation here? You added a new shop on top of an existing address. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5762413868
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13710763517

3. How have you confirmed the data you added? The above mentioned poi is a supermarked in what appears to be a residential home, with as source a github issues page. Is this a place anyone could just visit?

4. Is this part of an organised editing campaign? if so, are you complying with the OEG? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing/Guidelines

Best regards,  
Taya Snijder,  
On behalf of the OSMF Data Working Group
TrumanBlurbank (2026-04-09 15:22:35+00:00): Hi Taya,

Thanks for reaching out. 
I'm part of the Bank-Exit Collective and help sometimes by adding merchants requested by users on our website. I'm not friendly with OpenStreetMap so sorry for my mistakes on the way to reference merchants.

1. I deleted an online shop which should not have been added to OSM previously and the second one is now a closed shop.

2. Yes, both nodes should be merged into a single one.

3. Data are coming from the referenced Github source issue. I checked if the shop has a physical address and then add it according to the data from issue.
I don't have confirmation for every data added so I "trust" the issue linking to it as reference.

4. Didn't know about this. I was just updating several changes in once as part of the Bank-Exit new merchants requests by users.

Feel free to revert any modification I made that does not comply with OSM rules and sorry for the mess.

Regards,
Truman Blurbank
Baloo Uriza (2026-04-06 17:59:37+00:00): If you're trying to speedymap buildings, please just map them as a node rather than with incorrect 2D geometry.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180934208
jumbanho (2026-05-15 14:33:39+00:00): Hi, thanks for your contribution to the map.  I noticed that in this changeset and several others you imported many of the EPA level 3/4 ecoregions.  I can appreciate that these data are interesting for maps, but these types of data are troublesome for OSM as they are not verifiable in an independent fashion.  First, the boundaries among these ecoregions are fuzzy, so cannot be independently surveyed by mappers.  Second, while they are produced by a government agency, they are not surveyed boundaries that are subsequently used for administrative purposes. Since the data are available freely from the government, they should be available for others to use in maps.  I'd be happy to remove the data from the database.
ForeverFlying (2026-05-15 16:30:23+00:00): My bad! Are there better ways to represent these data? If not, feel free to revert all my edits for ecoregions. In general, what are "acceptable" regions to add? For example are tourist regions in different states considered relevant regions to add? Or are regions to be added only if they have some administrative use (whether by a government or associated agency)?
Minh Nguyen (2026-05-15 19:28:16+00:00): Boundaries don’t have to be administrative in nature, but the more different they are from administrative boundaries, the harder it is to justify them in OSM, unless they’re verifiable on the ground of course.

From what I can tell, some states have tourism district boundaries that might qualify, because they aren’t just collections of counties and get prominent billing on maps and signs, but I suspect we wouldn’t be able to make a blanket rule about them.

As I see it, the issue with these ecoregions is that boundary=* is really for the kinds of boundaries that are explicitly defined as such (think legal boundary description texts), not for aggregates of measurements or classifications that can only exist as GIS layers. That said, these GIS features might be useful for piecing together a reasonable shape for a non-boundary that we don’t otherwise have a good shape for, such as a desert or forest.
woodpeck (2026-05-19 14:51:05+00:00): DWG Ticket#2026051910000433 / deleting these relations by user request.
NeisBot (2026-04-06 09:39:22+00:00): Hi Michał_Jura, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 99% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 12 name(s)
- 68 waterway(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180934568
Michał_Jura (2026-04-06 13:32:19+00:00): Wszystkie usunięcia cieków wodnych były celowe.

Natomiast poniższe powinny zostać:
35939060, v9
Halszka (40344094), v11
129130785, v7
1062376908, v3
1252631700, v3
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:09:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
MappingMore (2026-04-07 09:02:48+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:180986219
NeisBot (2026-04-06 09:45:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/977778989 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Car service station"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-14 10:33:38+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181315519
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:08:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
eggie (2026-04-06 10:05:59+00:00): Na jaren weer een bijdrage, maar nog geen welkomstmail ontvangen.. Bij deze Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
NeisBot (2026-04-06 09:54:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 8 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/93211576 v10 | 4 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/263372531 v10

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180935419
iandees (2026-04-06 12:44:37+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/263372531 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180944566, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
VLD0251 (2026-04-07 12:18:16+00:00): You have made over 5,000 edits without providing any edit summaries or sources!
 قمت بإجراء أكثر من 5000 تعديل دون تقديم أي تعليق أو مصدر
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:12:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
ajmat (2026-04-07 10:16:29+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: 180989321
VLD0251 (2026-04-07 12:18:06+00:00): You have made over 5,000 edits without providing any edit summaries or sources!
 قمت بإجراء أكثر من 5000 تعديل دون تقديم أي تعليق أو مصدر
ajmat (2026-04-08 05:24:59+00:00): Partially Revert of 180924886
iandees (2026-04-06 12:44:51+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5757438918 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180944578, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
NeisBot (2026-04-06 10:45:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13026492102 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Café Norah Goya"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-14 16:33:04+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181331987
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
Taya_S (2026-04-07 08:37:21+00:00): Please don't turn entire cities into a single building.
Has since been reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180943174
Wildsharky (2026-04-08 04:10:41+00:00): Revert of 180922051
eggie (2026-04-06 11:46:57+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
agilenewt21 (2026-04-06 11:14:08+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4610347
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4610342
chris66 (2026-04-15 07:16:32+00:00): Operator "Weiss ich nicht" ist kein gültiger Name.
iandees (2026-04-06 12:44:55+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2188806539 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180944584, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
nevw (2026-04-07 23:31:30+00:00): Hi, osmi shows this needs fixing.
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=148.66217&lat=-35.60234&zoom=14
You need to make a multipolygon with an outer ring and an inner ring where the trees are.
NeisBot (2026-04-06 11:27:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 12 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/191211703 v7 | 6 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/32990940 v7

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180940221