piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ChromeLotus (2024-10-30 22:04:22+00:00): I appreciate your time in investigating this matter. Thank you!
edisondotme (2024-10-09 21:46:34+00:00): https://dnr.wisconsin.gov/topic/parks/bluemound
woodpeck_repair (2024-11-10 19:13:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 158982060, 158982058, 158982055, 158982063 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed and problematic import, see discussion in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158523576 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158533273
ObscureAngel (2024-10-10 14:06:59+00:00): Bonjour, merci pour votre contribution :)

A l'avenir veuillez noter qu'il est recommandé de mettre des commentaires plus précis sur vos groupes de changements (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bons_commentaires_de_groupe_de_modifications). En effet le commentaire "Piggott" ne nous donne que très peu d'information sur les changements que vous avez opérés.

Bonne journée et bonne cartographie :)
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157691317
pantufla (2024-10-09 22:14:49+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4340097589/history
GerdP (2024-10-10 05:42:45+00:00): Moin aus Wildeshausen!
Die Geh- bzw. Radwege an der B6 in Heiligenfelde scheinen ziemlich speziell. In der einen Richtung mit VZ240 ausgeschildert, in der anderen mit VZ 239,1022-10. Nach meinem Verständnis will man damit erreichen, dass Radfahrer nicht die Fahrbahn benutzen, aber auf beiden Seiten in beide Richtungen fahren dürfen. Ich denke, das man da einfach bicycle=designated setzen sollte?
SekeRob (2024-10-11 06:43:06+00:00): Hi,

There are bunch 'Correzione coastline' on Elba which actually have self intersections which stop them to render. Are you going to fix these? Details found on OSM Inspector, in bright, light blue and purple at :https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=10.29763&lat=42.79609&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.50&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Please let us know
wildmaps (2024-10-11 12:37:13+00:00): Hi,

thanks for your comment. I wasn't able to finish yesterday but now i fixed it.

Thanks
tyfi (2024-10-09 22:46:43+00:00): Also sources from company websites opening hours and telephone numbers.
DaveF (2024-10-10 12:25:43+00:00): Hi
Where did you obtain the maxpeed info for this road?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24528007
DaveF (2024-10-10 14:24:24+00:00): Hi
I think these are more accurately described as chokers not chicanes.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12239834028
aTarom (2024-10-10 05:36:15+00:00): Hola, cuando puedas dime si el tag
rgb_orto=yes
es algo provisional.
Saludos y gracias por el buen trabajo
Andrea Del Sarto (2024-10-10 10:09:30+00:00): Buongiorno,
i tag relativi ai percorsi escursionistici vanno inseriti nelle relazioni non negli elementi che compongono la relazione.
Può trovare le linee guida di inserimento qui: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:CAI

Buona mappatura
Frans S (2024-10-25 08:56:05+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please tag highways in between agricultural plots not as an unclassified highway but as  a track.
Except where that trace leads to a single farm or similar. Then the tag 'service' is a better choice.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157692551
Frans S (2024-10-19 08:32:02+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
About tagging of highways.
Traces, just as access to farmland, no through going function. should be tagged as 'track' or when it is narrow < 2 mtr. as path.
Best regards
Frans S (2024-10-19 08:34:00+00:00): btw,  tracks, access to, and in between farmland are not required to be mapped.
mcliquid (2024-10-10 07:52:11+00:00): Hi and thank you for your contribution!

Please note for the future: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
aharvey (2024-12-10 10:17:31+00:00): Looks good @Tewuzij

I disagree @mcliquid, for a change like this, its better to keep it together as all the changes are related, as it makes it easier to review, comment on, etc.
GinaroZ (2025-05-15 20:47:08+00:00): assume this is a toucan / bicycle=yes?
CycleAlex (2025-05-16 01:02:13+00:00): Yes, thanks for catching. Updated just now
NeisBot (2024-10-09 23:58:38+00:00): Hi Christ Lubang, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 96% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 30 highway(s)
- 13 building(s)
- 2 waterway(s)
- 7 landuse(')

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=157692993
Glassman (2024-10-11 02:21:25+00:00): I noticed you left a number of unconnected roads. Looking at some of the roads you removed, I agree that many do not exist. However, it's appropriate to connect roads. Please review this changeset and fix the disconnected roads.
pitscheplatsch (2024-10-12 07:02:47+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157775878
une abeille (2024-10-10 14:31:09+00:00): I am not sure if `addr:*` is meant to be used to show which buildings a parking garage serves. The wiki doesn't say anything, unfortunately.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-10-25 23:53:12+00:00): The provided imagery has cloud cover over the bridge. Is there another source?
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-10-25 23:58:40+00:00): referring https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/916887309 specifically
rivermont (2024-10-26 00:14:48+00:00): Those bridges were tagged destroyed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157376316, I only updated them to match other damage tagging.
ika-chan! (2024-10-10 01:04:27+00:00): I mean a stub, not a stud.
user_5359 (2024-10-15 14:59:46+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/305259283. What is the meaning of the tags 
FEATURE = SCHOOL
OBJECTID = 217713995
Did you know the key unsigned_ref (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ref).
Please also note that building=school only means that the building looks like a school, but does not have to contain a school (for that amenity=school would be necessary).
mcliquid (2024-10-10 07:52:26+00:00): Hi and thank you for your contribution!

Please note for the future: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
BCNorwich (2024-10-12 07:38:49+00:00): Hi, Many fictional features removed.
cuzi (2024-10-18 18:55:26+00:00): Hi, es gibt einen Hinweis zu diesem Weg, kannst du das vielleicht lösen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3810464
geisthugo123 (2024-10-18 19:06:16+00:00): Kann ich mir die Tage mal anschauen
pitscheplatsch (2024-10-10 08:50:20+00:00): Hi Timothy Jacobs, welcome to OSM

May we know the source of your mapping activity here? Thanks.
Timothy Jacobs (2024-10-10 08:59:27+00:00): This area is currently undergoing demolition due to a redevelopment project. I am attaching a link for your reference. Thank you!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zbZu-KfSkAg
pitscheplatsch (2024-10-11 15:40:12+00:00): Thanks for your reply, Timothy Jacobs!

#HappyMapping
user_11609320 (2024-10-10 02:20:58+00:00): https://www.inyocounty.us/sites/default/files/2020-02/Landuse%20Diagrams.pdf
BCNorwich (2024-10-11 06:39:05+00:00): Hi, Please don't place a highway on top of another highway. It's duplication that could disrupt routing.

I've just removed 20 duplicated highways that you added, please try to avoid doing this. 

Regards Bernard.
quoc_doananh (2024-11-26 03:08:06+00:00): Hi BCNorwich.

I apologize for the mistake regarding the duplicated highways. Placing highways on top of each other can indeed cause issues with routing and navigation. I will ensure to avoid such errors in the future and double-check my work to maintain accuracy.

Thank you for bringing this to my attention and for correcting the duplicates.

Best regards,
tastrax (2024-10-10 10:02:10+00:00): Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx. I have just updated this cafe. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features#Phone_Numbers .
RubenKelevra (2025-03-17 01:17:07+00:00): Warum genau löschst Du hier richtige Tags und machst das Routing kaputt?
drolbr (2025-03-17 05:19:04+00:00): Ich habe hier fehlerhaftes Tagging gelöst, nach Prüfung vor Ort!

Z.B. ist auf der Wohnstraße https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/154557771 ein Fake-Radweg eingetragen gewesen, obwohl dort gar kein Radweg existiert.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/739074888 wurde als Einbahnstraße gekennzeichnet, obwohl es dort weder ein Verbotsschild noch ein sonstiges Verbot gibt. Nicht für Radfahrer (z.B. solche, die den Parkplatz der Standortkommandator erreichen wollen), und erst recht nicht für Fußgänger (wie es bei hw=footway + oneway=yes zu verstehen wäre).

Die anderen Änderungen sind entsprechend.

Wenn hier ein Routing "kaputt" sein sollte, wäre es gut zu wissen, welches genau, um die Fehler im Router bzw. dessen Profil zu beheben.
RubenKelevra (2025-03-17 09:11:53+00:00): Bitte erklär doch mal was Du mit "Fiktive Einbahnstraße" und "wurde als Einbahnstraße gekennzeichnet, obwohl es dort weder ein Verbotsschild noch ein sonstiges Verbot gibt" meinst, denn "oneway=yes" ist dort absolut richtig.

Routing in Organic Maps zum Beispiel ist kaputt, dank Deiner Änderung.
drolbr (2025-03-18 04:57:00+00:00): Diskussion in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163711337 fortgesetzt, da inhaltlich zusammenhängend
tyfi (2024-10-10 03:03:10+00:00): I tagged the HQ as a node within the building footprint of House 5. If there's a more idiomatic way to indicate the HQ's location, feel free to do that. I just didn't feel like "House 5" and "HQ" were synonymous? I felt that "the HQ is in House 5" is a more appropriate assessment, but that's just my perspective.
5m4u9 (2024-10-10 04:43:08+00:00): Hola, bienvenid@!

lastimosamente voy a revertir tu cambio. La idea del mapa es añadir o mejorar cosas que existen.
Nakaner-repair (2026-04-30 11:18:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 182028718 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by user user_1890314. Reason: low quality contributions with Orgnaic Maps, personal notes, disrespect towards other mappers
user_5359 (2024-10-11 07:05:30+00:00): Hello! Please don't use the unknown key ADD_COMMENTS. A better key could be description.
Codesurfer (2024-10-13 13:32:45+00:00): Hi, your edits have added duplicate roads to this area triggering 4 Osmose issues and validation errors. Instead of adding new segments to roads, you can use the nodes to realign the roads. Please check the validation messages before saving. Thanks.
Udarian (2024-10-13 21:14:03+00:00): I have looked at this changeset on OSMCha and this commit doesn't duplicate anything the way deleted in changeset 157835565 was elongated into that shape in changeset 157736989, so that duplicated isn't on me.

all I did in this commit was updated the alignment of a few roads and streams and adding bridges and culverts were necessary.
Codesurfer (2024-10-14 14:01:17+00:00): Thanks for the clarification. No worries, I've tried to fix the issues so all should be good.
VicWM (2024-10-14 02:18:22+00:00): hey! No issues with you updating the way type, just wanted to let you know you missed a couple of bridges along the road. I've fixed them up now though :)
SHB2000 (2024-10-15 09:25:52+00:00): Oh whoops – cheers for fixing them haha :-).
literan (2024-10-10 17:35:03+00:00): ЖК давно добавлен соответствующим полигоном. Не нужно дублировать, тем более точкой
mcliquid (2024-10-10 07:52:34+00:00): Hi and thank you for your contribution!

Please note for the future: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
mcliquid (2024-10-10 07:52:39+00:00): Hi and thank you for your contribution!

Please note for the future: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
mcliquid (2024-10-10 07:52:45+00:00): Hi and thank you for your contribution!

Please note for the future: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
Winston Sung (2024-10-10 08:08:02+00:00): Hello,

I was using Level0 as it do help me to group changes based on the visual map. However, it could not handle relations and ways properly and stuck on loading their child ways/nodes.

I saw "The JOSM editor permits splitting changes done across a larger area in saves of smaller parts" on the page. However, I only found this: https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/19712 .

Is there any functionality/feature to split edits into changesets based on country/region/province/state in JOSM? Is there any link describing it?

Thanks for the help.

Winston Sung
Winston Sung (2024-10-10 14:28:21+00:00): Follow-up: Dennis from OpenStreetMap Taiwan had told me there's a way to limit queries in Overpass Turbo.
mcliquid (2024-10-10 14:57:45+00:00): Sure, here is the documentation: https://dev.overpass-api.de/overpass-doc/en/full_data/area.html
nevw (2024-10-10 22:34:11+00:00): Hi, is this a tagging error?
nevw (2024-10-10 22:34:31+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12240518661/history#map=19/-37.914268/145.056684
nevw (2024-10-14 09:06:20+00:00): I have fixed 5 instances of sport=bullfighting tag in Victoria. Finger trouble with app is likely culprit I guess
Pakenhamin (2024-11-01 11:00:34+00:00): That is true and it doesn't count the ones I catch myself before sending them in.

Finger trouble with the app and not noticing the error is what lets them slip through.
mcliquid (2024-10-10 07:52:52+00:00): Hi and thank you for your contribution!

Please note for the future: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
Kovoschiz (2024-10-10 10:09:35+00:00): Where was this discussed? `=class` is still more numerous, and listed for OpenIndoor. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenIndoor#Rooms
There are other problems with `room=` eg `=toilet` vs `=toilets` https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:room#Avoid_room=toilets (also how to distinguish open stalls with partitions vs actual room-like stalls with walls) 
The other major issue is `room=` `=shop` , `=restaurant` , `=reception` could be used to show the main `=room` . That's not covered by `amenity=` https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:room#Avoid_these_values
Actually you have uniliaterally discouraged it? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Key:room&type=revision&diff=2711907&oldid=2621100
Kovoschiz (2024-10-10 10:17:30+00:00): Others ref https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157698378 
https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/1355
InsertUser (2024-10-12 00:19:07+00:00): Has this been reverted?
Kovoschiz (2024-10-14 06:59:58+00:00): @InsertUser I thought I want to see if DWG has anything to say in the other edit. Also, at least one expressed support over `=classroom` itself https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:room#Classrooms
nevw (2024-10-10 04:56:55+00:00): Hi, you have added a building=residential but imagery does not display one.
Is there a building here?
mcliquid (2024-10-10 07:52:58+00:00): Hi and thank you for your contribution!

Please note for the future: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
martianfreeloader (2024-11-26 20:42:21+00:00): Reverted. Use smoothness=* instead.
eggie (2024-10-10 08:52:20+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
habi (2024-11-05 21:41:06+00:00): Hey!
Here you've added `access = privéq` onto several parking spaces around https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1322818407
I corrected that to `access=private` in. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158796106
Greetings,
habi
noorsazan (2024-10-10 05:25:57+00:00): مجتمع صنعتی نورسازان ،نمایشگاه مرکزی
woodpeck (2024-10-10 07:43:40+00:00): Dear Winston Sung, far-ranging automated/mechanical edits like the ones you're making are governed by a policy (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct). Primarily this requires that you discuss your editing plans with the community before you execute them. Please provide links to the community discussion about the renaming of language tags and classrooms. In the future, please make sure to include these links with your edits.
Winston Sung (2024-10-10 07:49:41+00:00): https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/1355

https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/1356
Winston Sung (2024-10-10 07:52:54+00:00): https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/pull/10488
woodpeck (2024-10-10 08:52:43+00:00): Hello Winston Sung, a change in editor presets (or a change in the Wiki) is NEVER a sufficient reason to apply word-wide changes to OpenStreetMap. Such changes must be discussed with the community independently of any editor presets. The forum community.openstreetmap.org is a suitable venue for this.
Kovoschiz (2024-10-10 10:12:40+00:00): As linked, you have to discuss it visibly on the official services beforehand for some days before editing, among other requirements. You haven't even obtained consensus in those pr.
Kovoschiz (2024-10-10 10:14:32+00:00): @woodpeck For easy reference, the user committeed another undiscussed mass retagged internationally after editing wiki https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157697294
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157697989
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157687202
Kovoschiz (2024-10-10 10:16:13+00:00): (sorry I overlooked. I see it's already known.)
Winston Sung (2024-10-10 14:25:49+00:00): > This (standardzing nan-* and zh-* keys) had been already discussed in both OpenStreetMap Mainland China and OpenStreetMap Taiwan Telegram groups.
> 
> - https://t.me/osmchina/93467/107453
> - https://t.me/OSMTaiwan/8898
> - https://t.me/OSMTaiwan/10448
> - https://t.me/OSMTaiwan/17888
> - https://t.me/OSMTaiwan/17891
Kovoschiz (2024-10-10 16:01:49+00:00): You are making a worldwide change, not in those countries only. The language doesn't mean you only need to discuss with countries using it as the native language. For one thing, there are speakers around the world as well. 
Let me give a simple example of a problem. It seems `description:*=` only refers to the script, not any differences between the 2 countries. Then `description:zh-TW` etc should rather be changed to `description:zh-Hant=` etc. An exception would be those `=monitoring_station` that actually use different words "空气质量" and "空氣品質" in them.
Kovoschiz (2024-10-10 16:07:01+00:00): Besides, another requirement is you need to create a wiki page to document this editing. On a minor note, it doesn't help that Telegram is a limited visibility service that others can't see the whole conservation publicly without joining.
Winston Sung (2024-10-13 18:45:47+00:00): (Note: A more explained link: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/What%27s_the_problem_with_mechanical_edits%3F )
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-08 03:41:20+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164659013
rhhs (2024-10-10 17:50:55+00:00): Why? I think especially for the buildings next to one of the ramps, it's very useful for routing purposes to have the name. I see no need to delete them.
Dimitar155 (2024-10-10 18:46:54+00:00): Because they are ramps. Ramps generally have destinations (be it streets, neighbourhoods or other places) instead of names. If they service surrounding buildings, then it's not really a ramp, is it?

In this case, there are signs on all four sides which show various destinations, which I'm going to add.

P.S. The parking spaces and access to the buildings on that side are likely "заварено положение" from before the bridge over the junction.
rhhs (2024-10-12 18:26:01+00:00): Adding the destinations is great, but removing the names is not an improvement, I think
Dimitar155 (2024-10-13 14:54:25+00:00): Depends on which navigation you are using. OsmAnd, for example, shows the name before the destination and is limited to a single row. In this specific case the name barely fits the screen and the destination is off the screen.

You can simulate it on your phone (when setting start/finish, there is a cogwheel at the bottom right. From there the last option is "Simulate navigation".). You can also try it here, on the OSM site, by comparing the instructions coming from Valhalla (which has the new data) and OSRM (which has the old data as of now).