piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:41:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321491 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Laos
WoSoe (2025-11-06 05:45:13+00:00): Bitte die Warnungen mit den überschneidenden Straßen und dem nicht geschlossenen Multipolygon beheben (siehe Tabelle oben, die beiden letzten Zeilen).

Aktuell sind nahezu alle Bus Routen unterbrochen.
eggie (2025-11-06 10:00:23+00:00): Dag AvN,
  Lijkt me oke zo.
Die Boschweg gaat ergens over in de Verlengde Eijsderbosweg. 
Wellicht iets om nog uit te zoeken.?
https://www.verbeterdekaart.nl/#?geometry.x=180279.82&geometry.y=310610.69&zoomlevel=13.26



MVG
eggie
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:45:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321633 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - United States
eggie (2025-11-05 16:27:10+00:00): Welkom bij OSM.

De info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode.

MVG
eggie
user_5359 (2025-11-05 18:17:23+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice the difference between a name and a description. 
I remove you two nodes "Flock camera".
If you need more information (and cannot find any examples or ask anyone else), please visit our wiki at https://wiki.osm.org.
vng_me (2025-11-06 01:39:56+00:00): You change breaks coastlines. Please, read Wiki about natural=coastline tag. Fixed here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174265883
eggie (2025-11-05 16:31:02+00:00): Dag tz,

Nu nog een issue.

Webshops worden niet opgenomen in OSM wanneer er geen bezoekadres is.
Wanner hier wel een bezoekadres is, maar geen winkel dan zou je office=company kunnen gebruiken, maar geen shop tag.

MVG
eggie
tz09 (2025-11-06 13:14:33+00:00): Het is een bezoekadres voor afhalen, en vanaf volgende week ook een winkel en showroom voor de grotere producten (thuisbatterijen, kano's en tenten) waar geen plaats voor is in de winkel aan de Bakkerstraat
eggie (2025-11-06 13:48:31+00:00): Oke.. duidelijk..
VLD549 (2025-11-17 14:42:56+00:00): Hi, I was asked to verify name changes. Without doubting you mapping skills, both BAG and Bing Maps indicate this to be Ypeloweg. Could you provide a link of some sort that shows it to be different?

Thank you for your contributions.
Geim (2025-11-17 14:57:01+00:00): Based on this note: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5039408#map=18/52.338528/6.591995&layers=N
And BGT confirmation: https://www.verbeterdekaart.nl/#?geometry.x=237208.89&geometry.y=484075.64&zoomlevel=13.29
habi (2026-06-19 14:31:52+00:00): Ciao Turbo_Rafu

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dswimming_area should only be in the water, not on the ground like you've added it here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1447739593
I've corrected this in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184318891
Happy mapping,
habi
dmjab13 (2025-11-06 14:26:14+00:00): it would probably be better to do these edits on a state by state basis in the future
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:42:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321507 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Mexico
dmjab13 (2025-11-06 14:26:03+00:00): it would probably be better to do these edits on a state by state basis in the future
ZLima12 (2025-11-28 10:01:03+00:00): I don't know if I agree with highway implying line geometry; I think it's just usually true. In this case, highway=rest_area is only supposed to be used on nodes and closed ways, so it seems kind of redundant to include area=yes. Data consumers should just refrain from using objects with tags that they don't understand, even if they have a general rule for the key (i.e. don't treat a rest area as a routable highway)
quincylvania (2025-11-29 18:27:15+00:00): @dmjab13 You're probably right.

@ZLima12 I see your point, but as someone who's worked a lot with OSM data, I do feel strongly that we should try to minimize inconsistencies. More than 99% of all ways tagged `highway` are roads and paths, and we should be able to make basic assumptions about them without knowing the exact values. `highway=rest_area` and `highway=services` are notable exceptions, and require every single data consumer to write special code to properly account for them. This increases the burden for apps using OSM. Adding `area=yes` to all exceptions like these reduces the burden without affecting other applications. It's easy enough to ignore the tag.
Eric S (2026-02-24 19:51:43+00:00): Il ne faut pas changer de classification de route sur un seul tronçon. Soit tout (de St-Paul-lez-Durance à Rians/D23), soit rien. Par ailleurs, la classification d'une route s'évalue sur sa desserte. J'ai vu que des voitures qui arrivaient de St-Maximin prenaient cette route pour rejoindre l'A51 (effet Waze?). De ce point de vue, secondary paraît raisonnable (perso, je passe par Ginasservis).
Carto Diem (2026-02-25 11:22:01+00:00): Bonjour.
Merci de votre retour. Effectivement, sûrement à cause Waze et autre GPS, la liaison A51 <> A8 passe par cette petite route. Elle est très étroite, extrêmement sinueuse et le croisement de véhicules plus imposants (caravanes, camionnettes) devient un vrai problème voire un danger. Je vous laisse voir ce que vous préconisez pour cette route mais je ne pense pas qu'elle doive être au niveau d'une grosse départementale. 
En tout cas merci pour votre vigilance.
Eric S (2026-02-25 16:16:28+00:00): J'ai homogénéisé dans votre sens, considérant que vous connaissez mieux le coin que moi.
rempshaener (2025-11-09 19:36:08+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.

Auf Grund des ungewöhnlich großen Changesets und der Quellenangabe weise ich vorsorglich auf osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines bzw. osm.wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct hin.

Das fire_hydrant:type=unknown gibt es bei OSM nicht; ich möchte dich bitten, das Feld zu löschen.

Viele Grüße
g_ib (2025-11-11 10:52:09+00:00): Hallo,
vielen Dank und vielen Dank für den Hinweis bzgl. des fehlerhaften Felds!
Das Feld wurde nun, wie vorgeschlagen, entfernt.
Viele Grüße
user_5359 (2025-11-05 18:08:06+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Thanks for your addition!

You only added the name of a business to the building, but did not note that there is also a business there.  If you do not know the spelling of the tag, please look it up in the wiki https://wiki.osm.org.
felipeeugenio (2025-11-05 17:30:48+00:00): Hello. please be careful from deleting the adress.

regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174248437
Erlen Dur (2025-11-05 22:37:50+00:00): Yes, I know. And this time I deleted it with purpose, because the address is wrong. The house number belongs to the town hall, which I mapped further North the same street. This address here has a different number, which I am going to change soon.
akurpukov2 (2025-11-05 16:16:19+00:00): Do not add it! I just try a feature in OrganicMaps, and placed bus stop in slighty wrong location.
habi (2025-11-05 20:31:15+00:00): Hey!
Der Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/46341226 hier ist zwar auf den Bing Luftfotos zu sehen, diese sind aber laut den Metadaten aus "7/19/2010-5/6/2015".
Die swisstopo Orthofotos sind im Normalfall in der Schweiz höchstens 3 Jahre alt, dort ist der Weg nicht zu sehen.
Gibt es den Pfad in der Realität so, oder hast du den "nur" von den Bildern eingezeichnet?
Gruss,
Habi
habi (2025-11-10 10:32:47+00:00): Ich habe die Pfade und Feldwege in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174455700 an die verfügbaren swisstopo Orthofotos und die Strava Heatmap angepasst. Und dabei auch ein-zwei Pfade gelöscht, die nicht mehr zu sehen sind.
Kannst du das mal anschauen, ob das so in etwa mit der Realität 'on the ground' übereinstimmt?
Coslog (2025-11-05 18:37:38+00:00): Correction: the short description of the changeset should be "Add Nanyangshan Great Ridge."
Baloo Uriza (2025-11-05 16:40:40+00:00): I added the tags for the optometrist office.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174248927
Technotion (2025-11-05 18:30:42+00:00): This edit moved the entire Duderstadt library footprint to an inaccurate location halfway into The Grove, and created multiple overlap conflicts. Always remember to double check your changeset before publishing!
NoctZan (2025-11-05 19:58:35+00:00): Oops, sorry about that! I'll make sure to pay closer attention to my future edits.
Technotion (2025-11-07 20:15:55+00:00): No worries. Glad to have another active mapper around UM!
habi (2025-11-05 20:17:38+00:00): Hey enristuda007
Du hast hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25994829 von einer Landstrasse (highway=secondary, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Switzerland/Map_Features#Highway) zu einem Pfad geändert.
Ein Pfad wird eher nicht von Auto befahren, die Breitenbachstrasse sieht aber anhand der Luftfotos deutlich nach Landstrasse aus, und es verlaufen auch vier Buslinien darüber.
Das macht nicht Sinn, ich habe deshalb dein Changeset zurückgesetzt, OK?
Erklär doch, was du machen willst, dann finden wir einen Weg, das umzusetzen...
habi (2025-11-05 20:18:23+00:00): Revertiert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174258183
habi (2025-11-05 20:35:20+00:00): Der Pfad https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1447747492, der in den swisstopo Bildern zu sehen ist, habe ich in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174258811 wieder hergestellt...
enristuda007 (2025-11-08 09:47:07+00:00): Hey habi,
Ja ich habe nur die Bilder genutzt. Die Kurzwanderung hat eine andere Person geleitet. Den Privat-Track habe ich aufgenommen, mich aber nicht auf die Umgebung konzentriert. In Swisstopo habe ich bei starker Vergrösserung gesehen, dass der Weg 1157170445 nicht mehr existiert. Habe nun versucht obgenannten Weg und 46341226 abzutrennen. Mich aber nicht getraut. Ich will ja nicht nochmals die Breitenbach-Hauptstrasse zum Pfad degraddieren.
PS. Mein Track habe ich auf ‚ identifizierbar‘ geändert.
habi (2025-11-10 10:36:20+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1157170445 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/46341226 sind nun gelöscht.
Die jetzt bestehenden Wege stimmen mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/enristuda007/traces/12105299 überein.
enristuda007 (2025-11-10 17:32:47+00:00): Hey habi,
danke sieht gut aus. 
Der nicht mehr existierende Weg ist bei unterschiedlichen Zoomstufen noch sichtbar. Ist das systembedingt ?
habi (2025-11-10 21:54:02+00:00): Ja, entweder weil die sog. Kacheln nicht nicht neu gerechnet sind, oder noch alte Kacheln in deinem Browser-Zwischenspeicher verbleiben: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Browser_cache
enristuda007 (2025-11-11 09:06:06+00:00): Danke für den wiki-link !
felipeeugenio (2025-11-05 17:30:16+00:00): Hello, That pointy end facing south, it is probably the shape of the roof, not the structure.
We map the structure.

regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174249041
Coslog (2025-11-05 18:36:41+00:00): Correction: the short description of the changeset should be "Add an alternative name of Nanyangshan Great Ridge."
Lokai (2025-11-06 07:19:54+00:00): Guten Morgen,

danke für die Nachbesserung.
Allerdings ist nun der highway-Schlüssel mit gelöscht worden. So wird der Weg nicht mehr auf der Karte gezeigt. An den Weg angeschlosse Wege "hängen in der Luft".
Letze Veränderungen hier:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=174249357

Einige Schlüsssel sind nicht nötig angegeben zu werden.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Germany

Ich werde den Weg etwas bearbeiten. Sie können gerne danach drüber schauen.

Gruß

Lokai
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:40:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321436 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - France
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:40:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321436 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - France
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:40:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321436 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - France
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:45:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321643 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Venezuela
BCNorwich (2025-11-05 18:28:10+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The tags you added to the school building were already on the school grounds outline as per OSM practice. Thus I've removed the duplicated info from the building.

Regards Bernard.
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:45:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321643 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Venezuela
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:40:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321399 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Colombia
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:39:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321366 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Brazil
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:39:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321366 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Brazil
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:39:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321366 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Brazil
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:43:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321543 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Paraguay
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:26:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186320984 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Argentina
Coslog (2025-11-05 18:35:11+00:00): Correction: the short description of the changeset should be "Add Nanyangshan Second Ridge."
Jrachi (2025-11-06 07:07:19+00:00): Ciao.
Non hai inserito il source, per cui ti dovrei chiedere se questo percorso esiste o se è solo frutto della tua fantasia...
Scherzi a parte.
Dove hai pescato i tag:
finish=Montorfano (rive del lago)
length=26
start=Meda (Piazza Vittorio Veneto)

Ho anche il dubbio che 
name=Meda - Montorfano
Sia una descrizione e non un vero nome!

Ti consiglio di leggere le pagine wiki relative alle https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route=hiking

Ivo
Cortix (2025-11-06 15:42:54+00:00): Su alcune sono andato a memoria, dato che non avevo molto tempo ieri sera. Ora è sistemata
Angelo Giuseppe (2025-11-10 13:55:47+00:00): Guarda un pò! Hai concellato più di 40 relazioni del CAI Seregno perchè non c'erano i cartelli, quì che ci sono fisicamente non li hai mappati !?
Hai forse solo copiato il percorso dal sito?
Gli unici cartelli rimasti sono quelli mappati anni fa dal CAI Seregno sul percorso storico.
Angelo Giuseppe (2025-12-09 16:23:00+00:00): Del sentiero Me Mo sempre preso da un KLM di Google sul sito https://sentieromedamontorfano.it/mappa/ , aspettiamo liberatoria in quanto coperto da Copyright.
silversurfer83 (2025-11-05 19:49:56+00:00): Hi :)

you added two "highway=living_street" to this place. Why not "highway=residential"?

Also, please leave better changeset comments. Thank you
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174252311
NeisBot (2025-11-05 18:06:51+00:00): Hola ark_00, bienvenido al proyecto OSM y gracias por tu contribución. 
Para hacer que la colaboración sea más fácil y ayudar a los demás a entender tus ediciones, es mejor agregar una breve descripción de los cambios que hiciste. Los comentarios claros ayudan a la comunidad a seguir tu trabajo y a proporcionar mejores comentarios. Puedes encontrar consejos para escribir buenos comentarios aquí[1].
(Auto-translation)
---
Hi ark_00, welcome to the OSM projekt and thanks for your contribution!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish
NeisBot (2025-11-05 18:06:56+00:00): Aquí está un comentario de ejemplo basado en tus ediciones del mapa: "Agregué edificios, actualicé características naturales incluyendo matorrales, bosques, pastizales, eliminé parques"
(Auto-translation)
---
Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added buildings, updated natural features including scrub, wood, grassland, removed parks"
Tomas Straupis (2025-11-05 19:13:24+00:00): Na 5metrų pločio „žiedų“ tikrai nereikėtų žymėti. O dar kai segmentai po dešimt centimetrų, tai tikrai nuo to duomenų kokybė tik blogesnė.
Tomas Straupis (2025-11-05 19:15:06+00:00): Oj, ir prie gatvės prisegti šaligatviai atskirais vektoriais. Pagal Lietuvos žymėjimo susitarimus taip nedarome - nuo to turim tik makaronų kalną ir jokios naudos.
evgenykatyshev (2025-11-05 19:29:02+00:00): Oh, I didn't know. Seems a bit strange for me, but I got it.

Is there the wiki page with this agreement to read?

And maybe you know similar example in Lithuania which is already captured by aerial imagery?
Tomas Straupis (2025-11-05 20:40:01+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lt:WikiProject_Lithuania

5m wide - this is miniroundabout (point object) or nothing at all as they are insignificant. Vilnius is already well mapped by local mappers.
evgenykatyshev (2025-11-06 10:57:43+00:00): Thanks.

Yes, really Vilnius is pretty well mapped. Nevertheless there are a lot of things to be updated or added. I thought those place with roundabouts just wasn't updated yet because of lack up-to-date orthophoto.
s777n (2026-04-18 16:09:54+00:00): Вы добавили лицею denomination=baptist . Исправлено
JasonBob (2025-11-06 00:35:52+00:00): This entire terminal is in the process of being demolished. The gates you re-added no longer exist, and much of the building itself no longer exists.
JasonBob (2025-11-06 00:38:00+00:00): Hello, these fences are a recent addition due to the demolition/construction project at this location. Could you please revert your edits
8omask (2025-11-05 21:32:03+00:00): Νομίζω ότι δεν πρέπει να σχεδιάζεις ολόκληρα τετράγωνα ως ένα κτήριο.
JasonBob (2025-11-06 00:36:24+00:00): These transit stops no longer exist. This area is completely under construction.
NeisBot (2025-11-05 18:46:42+00:00): Hola JesOrt, bienvenido al proyecto OSM y gracias por tu contribución. 
Para hacer que la colaboración sea más fácil y ayudar a los demás a entender tus ediciones, es mejor agregar una breve descripción de los cambios que hiciste. Los comentarios claros ayudan a la comunidad a seguir tu trabajo y a proporcionar mejores comentarios. Puedes encontrar consejos para escribir buenos comentarios aquí[1].
(Auto-translation)
---
Hi JesOrt, welcome to the OSM projekt and thanks for your contribution!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish
NeisBot (2025-11-05 18:46:46+00:00): Aquí está un comentario de ejemplo basado en tus ediciones del mapa: "Se eliminaron los detalles del edificio y la cafetería"
(Auto-translation)
---
Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Removed building and cafeteria details"
BCNorwich (2025-11-07 08:17:39+00:00): Hi,
Regarding 73 Southfield Road and the tag addr:housename=73 Southfield Road, the name is not 73 Southfield Road nor is it 73, it has no name. The dwelling is an end terrace house not a semi-detached house. also the city is London not "London Borough of Ealing".

The above-mentioned points also pertain to numbers 71, 69, 67, 65, 63, 61, and 59.

Lastly the dwellings a terraced houses, they are joined by party walls. There are no gaps between them. 

I've made amendments so that the terrace is mapped to OSM practice. I hope you can see/understand what I've done. Need any help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.
angys (2025-11-25 05:53:48+00:00): Hi, please explain why you are adding non-Malaysian local name places in Pandan Perdana.
TinPetreković (2025-11-05 18:46:51+00:00): The node that was accidentally created has been removed in changeset 174254708

The node served no purpose.

openstreetmap.org/changeset/174254708
user_5359 (2025-11-06 07:42:24+00:00): Welcome to OSM! 
Do not add the building key to property unless the entire property is covered by the building.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-11-05 23:44:50+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1447776426

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:39:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321396 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Chile
LarsBG (2026-04-05 15:49:23+00:00): Er du sikker på at der er en ladestation her ? CIRCLE K ALBERTSLUND
Roskildevej 18B, Albertslund
qrisztly (2026-04-06 11:12:23+00:00): Hej Lars. Nej det ser mærkeligt ud. Jeg kommer der jævnligt og mener (mente), at have set ladestander, men når jeg nu tjekker deres hjemmeside finder jeg intet, så det lugter lidt af fisk. Vi må fjerne punktet og så tjekker jeg lige en ekstr gang på stedet næste gang jeg kommer forbi. Det bliver dog først 24/4, som det ser ud lige nu. Godt du var opmærksom! 👍
LarsBG (2026-04-06 13:46:34+00:00): Tak. Der er lige langt nok for mig at køre forbi. Så super du vil checke en ekstra gang.
stefvanschie (2025-11-05 19:07:51+00:00): Routing werkte hier niet lekker, probeerde me vanaf de Van Heuven Goedhartlaan in noord-westelijke richting hierovereen te sturen om vervolgens via de Opaallaan naar rechts weer de Van Heuven Goedhartlaan op te sturen, nu aan de andere kant van de weg. De fietspaden aan beide kanten hebben een G12a bord, dus dit mag niet, maar twijfel of deze oplossing het beste is. In principe zou dit het op moeten lossen, maar misschien is het beter om op de fietspaden relaties toe te voegen om aan te geven dat je bij de kruispunten alleen maar rechtdoor mag?
eggie (2025-11-05 19:53:35+00:00): Dag Stef.. 
Dat zal in ieder geval wel helpen.

Ik heb dat stuk vanaf de splitsing getagd met bicycle=use_sidepath en ook voor mofa en moped. .. t/m die ventweg 

bicycle=no tag je bij een C14 bord .. geen bord dan bicycle=use_sidepath
DXe wegklasse heb ik aangepast van de oversteek. Dat is geen secondary. 
Je hoeft geen relaties toe te voegen.
Ik heb de fietspaden wel van G12a tags voorzien.
Als geheugensteuntje:
G11: mofa=yes, moped=no, traffic_sign=NL:G11
G12a: moped=designated, mofa=designated, traffic_sign=NL:G12a
G13: moped=no, mofa=no, traffic_sign=NL:G13

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Cycleway

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-11-05 19:58:38+00:00): Maar probeer volgende week de routering even uit.. dan zullen de routers wel bijgewerkt zijn. Soms duurt het langer.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_bicycle&route=52.296229%2C4.682547%3B52.293828%2C4.68083#map=17/52.295065/4.682053&layers=N
stefvanschie (2025-11-06 09:08:04+00:00): Hoi eggie,

Bedankt voor je hulp. Had al het gevoel dat mijn aanpassing niet juist was, maar kwam er zelf niet echt goed uit. Ik zal binnenkort even met een router testen.
user_5359 (2025-11-06 08:10:08+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice we use (british) english for the keys. I remove your product description.