piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-28 14:33:48+00:00): I must now apologize retrospectively for my previous comment. It was sent too quickly by me out of emotion, without taking enough time to think it over. I would be glad if you continued to actively contribute to the OSM project. 

#HappyMapping
Andrea Musuruane (2025-02-26 14:31:27+00:00): Ciao. Questi non sono i nomi delle vie, sono i nomi delle località. Per favore smetti di inserirle sulle highway. Grazie, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162937643
Andrea Musuruane (2025-02-26 14:59:50+00:00): Fatto revert.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162975692
iandees (2025-02-25 16:27:33+00:00): Your changes are looking good, but please take the time to write out meaningful changeset descriptions. It's easier to understand what changes you intended to make. For example, this one could be "Specifying whether crossings are marked"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162937729
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-27 16:32:38+00:00): wycofuję edycje z podejrzanego konta, patrz brak odpowiedzi w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 i https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Map_Rivers/blocks

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166835076
Zach Tolar (2025-03-03 03:54:10+00:00): Looks like you've been doing exactly what I was planning on doing in/around the Ozarks, adding tributary streams! Did you happen to extend the King's River south of US-412 in one of these recent updates? In some maps that use OSM, I don't see the King's south of US-412 and I'm wondering if it was just recently added by you are someone else
rechlin (2025-03-03 04:40:58+00:00): Yes, I did extend the Kings River all the way to its source, going from "river" to "stream" to "intermittent stream" in the process.  I haven't noticed anyone else doing much work while I've been cleaning up the map in this area.

Some OSM consumers are a bit slower to get updates.  I've noticed Mapbox is very quick to get road updates but their waterway updates are more delayed, so you might see road changes from a month ago but no waterway changes more recent than several months.  Wikipedia Maps is really inconsistent with the map tiles, with some being fairly new but adjacent tiles being a year or more old; I don't think they have a good algorithm for regenerating their tiles.  But on the main OSM site of course everything should be current within minutes or hours at worst.

Basically my project now is to do a full TIGER road cleanup in NW Arkansas, and then also add streams as appropriate.  In Washington County, nearly all rivers and streams and many intermittent streams were already imported as "streams" so it was mostly just a matter of properly classifying them, but for the other counties the rivers and streams are largely missing entirely so I've been adding them.  My ultimate goal is to add any stream from the USGS topo maps that is visible on either the ADOP imagery or the USGS 3D elevation model; some I am skipping because there's really no evidence on either of the two photographic sources.  However, this is a big enough task that in some areas I've just focused on the more major streams while doing the TIGER cleanup.

I'm pretty much done with the TIGER cleanup portion in 6 NW AR counties (Benton, Washington, Carroll, Madison, Boone, and Newton), but as time permits I plan to do more.  I've not been quite as comprehensive with the streams yet, but the vast majority should be there now in those counties.
Zach Tolar (2025-03-03 14:20:38+00:00): Wow you've put quite a bit of work into this! I mostly update trails/streams as I see them missing or incorrect, but not to the extent that you've been doing! I use Gaia GPS primarily when I'm out in the field and they don't seem to update their tiles super frequently from OSM unfortunately. I just floated a portion of the King's River a couple days ago and noticed that it wasn't completely mapped south of 412. Quite the coincidence that you just happened to be updating the map at the same time!
lipuma (2025-02-25 15:47:28+00:00): Correctie: Gemeente Apeldoorn, Plaats Beekbergen
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-30 03:46:47+00:00): reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173955866
jmarchon (2025-02-26 05:08:09+00:00): Welcome to OSM!
NeisBot (2025-02-25 17:04:54+00:00): Hi marcusarmitage, and thank you for your contributions to the OSM project!

I've noticed that over the past few hours, you've made several changesets with comments that might be unclear, difficult to understand, or consistently repetitive.

For collaboration within the OSM community, it’s helpful to provide comments that explain the changes you’ve made. This helps others follow your work more easily. You can find some useful tips for writing clear and effective changeset comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Thanks for your attention to this.

PS: I’ve also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#ClearComments
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-27 19:47:48+00:00): Wow, what a creative use of hashtags! 

I almost thought I was reading a social media post instead of an OSM changeset comment. 

If only there were a way to explain what exactly was mapped or edited—imagine how much easier it would be for others to follow along. 

But hey, who needs clarity when you can have an alphabet soup of project codes, right?
</ironic>

#hotosm
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-28 14:33:53+00:00): I must now apologize retrospectively for my previous comment. It was sent too quickly by me out of emotion, without taking enough time to think it over. I would be glad if you continued to actively contribute to the OSM project. 

#HappyMapping
AkuAnakTimur (2025-03-02 06:43:58+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/285035549

Surprisingly there are Christians buried there as well...
NeisBot (2025-02-25 17:04:55+00:00): Hi dinaissamsakar, and thank you for your contributions to the OSM project!

I've noticed that over the past few hours, you've made several changesets with comments that might be unclear, difficult to understand, or consistently repetitive.

For collaboration within the OSM community, it’s helpful to provide comments that explain the changes you’ve made. This helps others follow your work more easily. You can find some useful tips for writing clear and effective changeset comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Thanks for your attention to this.

PS: I’ve also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#ClearComments
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-27 19:47:54+00:00): Wow, what a creative use of hashtags! 

I almost thought I was reading a social media post instead of an OSM changeset comment. 

If only there were a way to explain what exactly was mapped or edited—imagine how much easier it would be for others to follow along. 

But hey, who needs clarity when you can have an alphabet soup of project codes, right?
</ironic>

#hotosm
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-28 14:33:59+00:00): I must now apologize retrospectively for my previous comment. It was sent too quickly by me out of emotion, without taking enough time to think it over. I would be glad if you continued to actively contribute to the OSM project. 

#HappyMapping
eggie (2025-02-25 16:08:34+00:00): Dag HvN Ik heb noexit=yes verwijderd.
Dat klopte hier niet.

MVG
eggie
contrapunctus (2025-12-30 19:36:26+00:00): Hey blahblahhh, welcome to OpenStreetMap! 🙂

The building you added here doesn't seem quite right to me...have you seen this building in person?

Also, when adding buildings, please take care not to connect them to nearby roads.

Lastly, if you live in Delhi, the OpenStreetMap community of Delhi would love to meet you at one of our mapping parties! Check them out at this link - https://osmcal.org/?in=India

Happy mapping!
Herman Lee (2025-02-28 18:53:28+00:00): 由于引入了奇怪的编辑，此编辑集暂做退回
NeisBot (2025-02-25 17:05:00+00:00): Hi GageY123, and thank you for your contributions to the OSM project!

I've noticed that over the past few hours, you've made several changesets with comments that might be unclear, difficult to understand, or consistently repetitive.

For collaboration within the OSM community, it’s helpful to provide comments that explain the changes you’ve made. This helps others follow your work more easily. You can find some useful tips for writing clear and effective changeset comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Thanks for your attention to this.

PS: I’ve also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#ClearComments
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-27 19:47:59+00:00): Wow, what a creative use of hashtags! 

I almost thought I was reading a social media post instead of an OSM changeset comment. 

If only there were a way to explain what exactly was mapped or edited—imagine how much easier it would be for others to follow along. 

But hey, who needs clarity when you can have an alphabet soup of project codes, right?
</ironic>

#hotosm
GageY123 (2025-02-28 14:03:09+00:00): @pitscheplatsch

Thank you for your feedback. I am a new user and did not add those hashtags by choice. I really appreciate your constructive feedback and polite tone. Keep it up buddy.

</ironic>
NeisBot (2025-02-28 14:15:27+00:00): Thanks for your reply. It would be nice if you would remain active in the OSM project.

#HappyMapping
NeisBot (2025-02-28 14:21:42+00:00): I must now apologize retrospectively for my first comment. It was sent too quickly by me out of emotion, without taking enough time to think it over.
s777n (2025-02-25 21:51:59+00:00): Здравствуйте. Вы случайно повернули здание на 45 градусов. Исправил.
GinaroZ (2025-02-27 21:53:35+00:00): I'm guessing meadow/pasture is supposed to be for permanent grass rather than farmland for crops or land that is turned over? I just tagged most things as farmland but I can see that makes sense.
ExoMal (2025-02-27 22:36:24+00:00): That's the interpretation I used, wiki's definition matches. Not sure how much use my re-tagging of farmland is (how often is arable farmland converted to pasture/vice-versa?). In any case, I was mainly focusing on splitting up large farmlands based on fence/wall dividers, tagging meadows was just a fun little side mission :)
StC (2025-03-12 21:08:53+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changeset et le précédent ont brisé l'ordre, donc la continuité, de la relation. Je m'occupe de la réparation.
NeisBot (2025-02-25 17:01:40+00:00): Hello, thank you for your contribution.

I noticed that some of the tags and descriptions you've used appear to be related to #SEO #spam. I recommend reading the following page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Spam

Could you please confirm if your map edits here were intentional?

#MapWithoutSpam #TagSmartNotSpam
pitscheplatsch (2025-03-13 12:16:28+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/162943332
Andrea Musuruane (2025-02-26 14:31:49+00:00): Ciao. Questi non sono i nomi delle vie, sono i nomi delle località. Per favore smetti di inserirle sulle highway. Grazie, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162940429
Andrea Musuruane (2025-02-26 14:59:51+00:00): Fatto revert.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162975692
pitscheplatsch (2025-03-13 12:19:09+00:00): 👍 Thank you
NeatNit (2025-03-16 20:53:06+00:00): In this changeset you also moved a bus stop - מסעף מוסד אחווה. Was this intentional? Are you sure the new position is correct?

Either way, bus stops are never supposed to be attached to ways, they are supposed to just stand next to them. I detached the bus stop and placed it next to the road, near where you put it. Please let me know if the position is correct or if instead it should be restored to where it was before.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-02-25 16:52:46+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/324336131

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
WieKo68 (2025-02-25 16:55:36+00:00): poprawione
AndersAndersson (2025-02-25 22:43:47+00:00): Hej och välkommen till OpenStreetMap!
Kul att du vill förbättra kartan. Jag tog mig friheten att ändra lite och nu finns där en iläggningsramp för båtar.
Längre ut på udden var jag lite osäker på vad det var du ville göra.
Fortsätt gärna att lägga ni saker du vet om som saknas. Jag hjälper gärna till om jag kan.
Jrachi (2025-02-26 09:46:32+00:00): Ciao.
La survey:date si scrive:
anno-mese-giorno
2025-02-14
e non 
14/02/2025
citrula (2025-02-25 21:54:33+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Since the name is already on the amenity=college area, I would not put it on the building as well. On OSM we try to have one object for each feature. Let me know if you have any questions

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/518663910
Ilya Kogan (2025-04-26 07:23:20+00:00): על פי ה-GIS של עיריית חיפה הרחוב נקרא יאיר שטרן. למה שינית את שמו לירמיהו הלפרין?
ameziol (2025-02-26 09:31:50+00:00): hej, trawniki i drzewka ładne, ale teraz wszystkie "poprawione" budynki są przesunięte względem stanu faktycznego.
obrysy budynków były wcześniej poprawnie, wzdłuż ich parteru, teraz gdy są poprowadzone wzdłuż dachu są okropnie przesunięte.

edytory osm mają możliwość wyświetlenia warstwy z obrysami budynków z geoportalu, proszę używaj jej
grzegorz75jan (2025-04-03 23:50:37+00:00): Te budynki to jakaś kpina i żenada.
Poczytałem o wyczynach oraz jego podejściu a resztę widać. 
Olo i jest na dobrej drodze do zakończenia kariery włącznie z sunięciem sporej ilości wprowadzonych zmian.
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/prosby-o-zmapowanie-poprawe/64939/3050

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian

https://youtu.be/xBMIoypkdI4?list=PLTgtPjgzssHzsgAqYbi2QfRoRk1S9ioX5&t=2596
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162942120
Andrea Musuruane (2025-02-26 14:34:27+00:00): Ciao. Questi non sono i nomi delle vie, sono i nomi delle località. Per favore smetti di inserirle sulle highway. Grazie, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162942340
map per (2025-02-25 20:54:37+00:00): Wegen review_requested:
Die Änderung sieht gut aus, danke!
Herman Lee (2025-02-28 18:53:38+00:00): 由于引入了奇怪的编辑，此编辑集暂做退回
dmfr (2025-05-13 17:26:11+00:00): Olá! Eu e o SilverKnight tínhamos chegado a um acordo para manter a way 1360331392 com junction=mini_roundabout. Isto porque geometricamente faz sentido manter como uma way (porque é uma rotunda grande), mas como a rotunda não possui nenhum obstáculo no centro, tecnicamente é uma mini_roundabout.

Podes explicar porque é que trocaste para roundabout?

Cumprimentos.
m2fc (2025-05-13 18:04:58+00:00): Olá,

Tecnicamente tem delimitação do "obstáculo" no centro mas de facto está tão baixo e tem marcas de pneu que de obstáculo tem pouco ou nada e é realmente grande o que faz sentido estar desenhada em vez de ser um ponto. Na altura verifiquei na documentação que mini_roundabout deve ser só definida em pontos e não ways e penso que foi com esse critério que fiz a modificação. Dado que a rotunda não é pequena e na documentação diz "As rotundas pequenas cujo interior pode ser atravessado por veículos (por camiões/caminhões, por exemplo), podem ser representadas como um nó, que é marcado com highway=mini_roundabout." Do que entendo desta frase, a questão da ilha só se aplica se a rotunda for mesmo pequena o que não é o caso.

Por mim estão à vontade para reverter pois é algo mínimo na prática mas não me parece que vá ao encontro do que a documentação diz.

Cumprimentos
m2fc (2025-05-13 19:02:32+00:00): Olá,

Não sei se estão no canal de telegram OSMPortugal mas o AntMadeira diz que neste caso a rotunda é mesmo mini_roundabout mas não deve estar desenhada como way e sim definida como um ponto.

Cumprimentos
topolusitania (2025-05-14 11:21:17+00:00): Olá
A wiki é um guia para a acção, não um livro de normas para ser seguido à risca. Neste caso muito particular, e verificadas as caracteristicas do local, largura das vias entrantes, desniveis, condicionantes do transito, defendo que neste local deve ser desenhada uma rotunda tradicional e não uma mini  rotunda. No entanto também acho que esta discussão é de um preciosismo tal que não merece que se perca muito tempo com ela. Prefiro mapear coisas novas uo corrigir erros realmente importantes. Boas "mapeações" a todos
Hufkratzer (2025-02-26 20:37:55+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1362903947 looks like riding arena; should be tagged like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1175384683
AllotmentCyclist (2025-02-27 17:55:19+00:00): Thanks for the advice, I have corrected now. How did this come to your attention?
Hufkratzer (2025-02-27 20:10:59+00:00): Riding centres and riding arenas are often confused. I correct some from time to time; e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/290761941 just now. The mistaggings have led to riding centres not being rendered on OSM Carto so far, see https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/pull/3660#issuecomment-462927711
Syl (2025-02-25 21:41:29+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai annulé le changement du nom de la pharmacie, ça ne correspondait pas au nom visible sur place.
Syl (2025-02-25 21:42:07+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai annulé le changement du nom de la boulangerie et du coiffeur, ça ne correspondait pas au nom visible sur place.
dypa (2025-02-25 20:09:59+00:00): Здравствуйте, у меня возникло 2 вопроса:
- почему вы удалили автомобильный заезд во двор?
- почему вы пешеходную дорожку сделали тропой?
Andrei Lazarev (2025-02-25 20:23:37+00:00): Спасибо за замечание. Не увидел, что продолжил рисовать автомобильный въезд, думал что рисую отдельную тропу. Из тропы сделал пешеходную дорожку.
dypa (2025-02-25 20:31:17+00:00): Спасибо за очень очень оперативное  исправление! 👍🔥💪
Syl (2025-02-25 21:40:31+00:00): Bonjour, c'est sûr que le cinéma Majestic fait partie de la marque ? Il n'est pas listé sur leur site : https://majestic-cinemas.com/
Syl (2025-03-01 15:06:10+00:00): Je viens d'enlever la marque.
Syl (2025-02-25 21:44:47+00:00): Bonjour, à quoi correspond cette marque "Ehpad du CH" ? À part sur NSI je ne trouve aucune information dessus.
Syl (2025-03-01 15:08:29+00:00): Je viens d'enlever la marque.
Fraxi (2025-02-25 18:51:05+00:00): Използвани снимки и от Esri Clarity
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-02-26 09:25:30+00:00): reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162963448
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2025-04-11 16:06:30+00:00): Please attach speed cameras to the road.

I do not know how to do it in OsmAnd, but you can easily to it with e.g., Id in a browser.

Because if the cam is not attached OsmAnd cannot warn you in the future.
Bozo_R5 (2025-04-12 06:52:09+00:00): Hello,
I just started a few weeks ago to edit in osm, so sorry for these little mistakes !
Did I just have to place "speed cameras" P.O.I. on the road ?
Thks
Bozo_R5 (2025-04-12 06:57:53+00:00): I just edited this one, can you tell me if I did it correctly ?
Thanks

https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?node=12618764161#map=17/48.774318/2.609748
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2025-04-12 12:46:59+00:00): Yes, that seems fine.

Thank you.
cyton (2025-02-26 13:00:12+00:00): ups, danke
PierZen (2025-02-25 19:09:39+00:00): Merci de contribuer à éditer et valider les données d'OpenStreetMap. La liste de vos éditions via OSMCha montre beaucoup de courtes sessions d'édition sans commentaire, ce qui rend difficile la validation par d'autres contributeurs : https://osmcha.org/?filters=%7B%22users%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%22MagdalenThot%22%2C%22value%22%3A%22MagdalenThot%22%7D%5D%2C%22date__gte%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%22%22%2C%22value%22%3A%22%22%7D%5D%7D

Tout comme vous l'avez fait avec le changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162944231, éditez plusieurs objets avant de télécharger vers OpenStreetMap.  Et ajoutez des commentaires pour faciliter le suivi par d'autres contributeurs.
chris2map (2025-04-11 21:22:00+00:00): Hello, you changed a highway=path in highway=pedestrian street. This value is not known for highways in OSM. Is it a mistake? On Bing imagery it looks like "path" was OK.
nick-28 (2025-04-11 22:30:12+00:00): Hello chris2map,

highway=pedestrian is a valid and frequently used tag. See:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpedestrian

I do not not think that streets with names like "Via Garibaldi" should be tagged as footpaths even if they sometimes resemble them.

Regards, nick
ivanbranco (2025-04-11 23:14:24+00:00): Maybe he should have used some brackets, he meant "highway=pedestrian street", not "highway=pedestrian", see: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/503557977
nick-28 (2025-04-12 06:21:01+00:00): That is a typo, of course. Feel free to correct it. Unfortunately, I cannot change it myself right now.
chris2map (2025-04-13 12:58:18+00:00): Yes, I was referring to the path outside / beyond the buildings, that was changed to "=pedestrian street", not the named street.
I fixed it now (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164892302).
Michaall99 (2025-02-25 19:06:31+00:00): Przypominajka o konieczności dodania numeru kierunkowego ;)
NorthCrab_upload (2025-02-25 19:20:53+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie powinna zawierać przedrostka. Nazwa ulicy nie powinna zaczynać się od 'ul.', 'ulica' itp. Należy usunąć przedrostek i pozostawić samą nazwę ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12618861401

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

Zasady nazewnictwa ulic w polsce:
https://wiki.osm.org/Pl:Znakowanie_dróg_w_Polsce#Nazewnictwo_ulic

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Kovoschiz (2025-02-26 08:18:45+00:00): Can you pleas don't use upload comment for discussions. No one is guaranteed to read and respond to it. 
1. `=pedestrian` means pedestrianized roadway, physically capable of vehicular travel. It should be used for EVA, and park maintenance roads. 
2. It's not deleted. `highway=` + `area=yes` should be used for large wide open "squares" capable of moving to every direction. `area:highway=` should be used for linear areas already described by other `highway=` lines well.
Kovoschiz (2025-02-26 08:21:19+00:00): 2. Please use OSMAnd to see rendering of `area:highway=`
citrula (2025-02-25 22:28:43+00:00): What do you mean by "not driveable"? On OSM, we have ways to specify if the road is private, poorly surfaced, etc - it shouldn't be deleted if it still exists.
CtI5UDYpRmUS (2025-02-25 19:51:02+00:00): Hello,
What is the mean of the tag of "access=no_ugps" on the way you created?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162946075
kmpoppe_repair (2025-02-25 21:03:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162949349 where the changeset comment is: Reverting CS 162946075 because of a probably bodged import. DWG Ticket#2025022510000474
kmpoppe_repair (2025-02-25 21:04:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162949377 where the changeset comment is: Reverting CS 162946096 because of a probably bodged import. DWG Ticket#2025022510000474