piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
habi (2024-02-02 19:45:13+00:00): Ciao MappSurfer

Ich war heute Nachmittag beim alten Tramdepot und habe mir die Situation genau angeschaut.

Es hat noch einige ganz wenige Gleisstummel, die habe ich nicht entfernt, sowie auch ein Bitz Gleis, der als Kunst am Bau im Hinterhof noch besteht (https://i.imgur.com/AXgibsW.jpg)
Ansonsten habe ich in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146998075 *jedes* Geleise ersatzlos gelöscht, das ich nicht 'on the ground' gesehen habe.
Ich war zwar nicht in den Häusern drin, aber ich nehme mal an, dass die Geleise nicht in den Wohnungen der Bewohner:innen verlaufen.

Wie schon mehrmals in verschiedenen Changesets von dir erwähnt: Trage *keine* Objekte in OpenStreetMap neu ein, die mal existiert haben, aber jetzt in der Gegenwart und Realität verifizierbar nicht mehr vorhanden sind.

Wenn du willst, dass irgendwelche historisch mal vorhandenen Geleise irgendwo noch erfasst sind, kannst du dich gerne in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:OpenHistoricalMap einlesen und dort beitragen.
Bei OpenStreetMap.org erfassen wir nur die Gegenwart.

E Gruess,
habi
Glassman (2024-01-23 18:12:53+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. I did remove the spam description and fixed the phone number but everything else looked okay
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146445902
Filip009 (2024-01-23 08:44:59+00:00): Zdravím, čo ste chceli dosiahnuť zmenou na tejto ceste https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/939993949 tým, že ste pridali zákaz vstupu všetkým a potom ho povolili chodcom a cyklistom?
DD1GJ (2024-01-20 09:51:51+00:00): Hello sfm009,

welcome to OpenStreetMap. Thank you for your contributions to improving the map. However, you have overlooked the fact that the associated car park is marked as private on OSM. In addition, Mapillary shows a ban on entry for lorries. These two restrictions (access=private and hgv=no) are missing from the ways you have entered.

How did you become aware of the missing ways?

Best regards, Joachim
sfm009 (2024-01-22 15:14:18+00:00): Hello, Joachim. Many thanks to you for your feedback on my changeset. Ways inside the parking were added according to satellite images of Bing (2019) and Esri (2022). Sorry for my mistake, I'll be more aware in a future. Missed restrictions were added in a new changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146557798. Please check the changes for correctness.

Best regards, Maksim.
MxxCon (2024-01-19 20:08:40+00:00): Since in US there’s no official regulatory body managing hotel star ratings and each hotel can rate themselves however many stars they want, it serves no purpose other than promotional/advertisement for the hotels.
As such, stars=* should not be used and will be deleted.
jeslop (2024-01-19 18:03:25+00:00): Reverted on changeset

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146453162
VLD157 (2024-01-19 16:38:45+00:00): Hello SUMAYYA 23, 
I am reaching out regarding your recent edits to ways 260448259, 1241035635, and 1241035634. These are part of multiple boundary relations, and now that highway tags have been added to them, they are causing invalid overlap with other features that the path intersects with. The highway tag does not seem correct for these sections (and the bridge added to 1241035635 also). Can you please resolve the issue? 
Thanks, 
VLD157
VLD157 (2024-01-29 18:13:39+00:00): The issue has been resolved. See changeset 146832844.
canfe (2024-01-19 17:53:42+00:00): Sarebbe sempre meglio, se possibile, non cancellare oggetti precedentemente mappati, bensì "modificarli" in modo da conservare la history e poterne valutare le modifiche anche da altri utenti.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146446979
UPegasus (2024-01-20 19:32:51+00:00): Hello! When you draw buildings, try to use the magic key "Q". It makes all the corners orthogonal, unlike your curved structures.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146447269
eggie (2024-01-19 15:47:29+00:00): Dag Huubsanders..
Wellicht https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:craft%3Dphotographer
.. toevoegen?

Mvg
eggie
huubsanders (2024-01-19 15:55:10+00:00): Hi Eggie

waar kan ik dat doen? Ben nog(redelijk) nieuw in OSM.

groet, Huub
eggie (2024-01-19 16:13:57+00:00): Dag Huub..
Je kiest in editor iD voor alle regels zichtbaar en dan regels aanvullen..
craft=photographer
Het =teken hoeft niet.. dat komt vanzelf.
Bij source nog even die link naar de wiki verwijderen.
De opmerking op de kaart kun je verwijderen.
Dacht overigens niet dat bij craft de naam zichtbaar wordt. Keus van de kaartenmaker.
Mapse..
eggie
eggie (2024-01-19 16:16:08+00:00): ..shop=photo geeft wel een symbool.. maar dan moet de vlag wel de lading dekken
eggie (2024-01-19 18:40:32+00:00): craft=photographer toegevoegd
eggie (2024-01-19 18:41:30+00:00): Dit
shop=photo – A shop dealing with photos or video in any way
shop=photo_studio – A place where you can have your photo taken

is nog mogelijk om de naam te laten renderen.
Gr eggie
canfe (2024-01-19 17:47:01+00:00): Credo che il name non sia solo "Garibaldi" ma che ci sia un via o corso o...
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146448423
ettosilvia (2024-01-19 18:01:09+00:00): Vero, grazie: e' 'via'.
Ma come faccio a modificare? Ho usato StreetComplete
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146448423
canfe (2024-01-20 06:00:23+00:00): Con Streetcomplete c'è la freccia "undo" in basso a sinistra, ma ormai hai chiuso la sessione e non compare più.
Potresti lasciare una nota.
Oppure l'unica è passare ad un vero editor da PC tipo ID o meglio JOSM.
Da cellulare c'è anche Vespucci, ma in tanti dicono che è duro da apprendere.
Ho provveduto a correggere.
PS: con SComplete fai attenzione se metti i civici, van messi dove c'è la targhetta, ma te li lascia mettere pure in mezzo ad un prato...
ettosilvia (2024-01-22 11:59:30+00:00): Grazie mille!
Prima o poi imparero'...
aceman444 (2026-04-25 12:14:13+00:00): Hi, why are you adding duplicate wikidata tags to parts of Devin castle?
eggie (2024-01-20 21:00:32+00:00): Dag D2

Wanneer je er van uitgaat dat je via de Zandvlietsluis naar zee gaat zou de 'richting' inderdaad zo gaan.
https://map.openseamap.org/?zoom=13.8&lon=4.27389&lat=51.38031&layers=TFTFFFTFFTFFFFFFFFFFFF

Je zou ook contact kunnen opnemen met een va voorgaande openseamappers.

Wellicht vind je hier ook antwoorden.
https://www.openseamap.org/index.php?id=openseamap&L=1

MVG
eggie
D2Hydro (2024-01-22 08:31:02+00:00): Dank Eggie voor de info! Ik heb de opemseap.org ook gecheckt en de richting gaat inderdaad via Kreekraksluizen -Antwerpse haven  naar zee.
mga_geo (2024-01-21 07:53:34+00:00): Bonjour,
Attention, vos modifications ont cassé la continuité de la relation route=bus 4294767. Le rôle "backward" n'existe pas dans le schéma PTv2.
Pouvez-vous corriger ?
Marc
mga_geo (2024-02-04 06:53:58+00:00): Bonjour,
Vous ne répondez pas ???
Marc
Jrachi (2024-06-15 07:44:05+00:00): Ciao.
C`è un`anomalia nel ref:REI
Ha solo 7 caratteri.
Probabilmente manca solo lo zero finale

Ivo
Jrachi (2024-06-15 07:50:58+00:00): 

Ciao.
C`è un`anomalia nel ref:REI
Ha 9 caratteri.

Ivo
VictorIE (2024-05-31 23:14:52+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/194375925/history

This is mapped as a bridge about 2 km long. It doesn't seem right. :)
MTB Guy IRL (2024-06-01 07:48:05+00:00): Well Spotted! That should be fixed now! Thanks for pointing it out. Much appreciated 👍🏻
fortera_au (2024-01-24 00:32:30+00:00): Hey, opening hours need to be formatted a specific way, I've updated them for you.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146449422
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-19 16:20:52+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11531257760

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NeisBot (2024-01-20 00:31:05+00:00): Hi soyandaluz 👋

your recent changeset has been marked due to a temporary or permanent block from further map edits. 

If you have any questions or if there's anything you'd like to discuss regarding the mapping, feel free to reach out! 

Best regards, 🤖

Details https://osm.org/user_blocks/15593
#ContributorHasBeenBlocked
gurglypipe (2024-01-19 23:25:50+00:00): Hi, is this change for routing reasons or something? There isn’t actually grass in the carriageway. Perhaps adding a path from the road to the towpath would make more sense?
gurglypipe (2024-01-21 12:45:15+00:00): I’ve change it to a footpath in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146511267. If it’s possible to connect through to the canal towpath, please say or edit the map to extend the footpath as appropriate. Thanks.
ainki (2024-01-20 15:12:08+00:00): Moi,
Huomasin että olit poistanut rakenteilla olevan alueen ja lisännyt ennen rakennustyömaata olleet elementit takaisin. Ei syytä huoleen kävin palauttamassa Niittykummun pään muutoksia changesetissä #146481240. Huomiona tulevia editointeja varten, että ilmakuvat voivat olla muutamia vuosia vanhoja ja kartoitetut elementit voivat olla uudempia kuin ilmakuvassa, tästä changesettinä esimerkkinä rakenteilla oleva alue todenäköisemmin uudempi kuin metsä joka näkyy ilmakuvissa.

Lisäksi, kävin vähän editoinithistoriaa läpi ja huomasin että olet poistanut asioita ja lisännyt osa niistä uudelleen myöhemmin tai eri paikkaan. Yleinen suositus on koittaa muokata jo olemassa olevaa elemnttiä parhaan mahdollisuuden mukaan, jotta elementin historia säilyisi, ja poistamista kannattaa käyttää aina harkiten.
liljaadeliina (2024-11-20 08:50:45+00:00): Kiitos viestistäsi, tein tosiaan virheen. Kiitos kun korjasit sen.
NeisBot (2024-01-21 00:31:05+00:00): Hi googlenaut 👋

your recent changeset has been marked due to a temporary or permanent block from further map edits. 

If you have any questions or if there's anything you'd like to discuss regarding the mapping, feel free to reach out! 

Best regards, 🤖

Details https://osm.org/user_blocks/15594
#ContributorHasBeenBlocked
eggie (2024-01-19 18:37:51+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
fortera_au (2024-01-24 00:31:32+00:00): Hey, I'd keep the branch part out of the name tag and just put it into the branch tag, I've updated this for you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146450672
silversurfer83 (2024-01-19 17:42:34+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.

vorneweg: Ich habe diese Änderung wieder Rückgängig gemacht
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146452461

Dies ist eine freie Geodatenbank die täglich von Millionen Menschen genutzt wird und kein Spielplatz. Solche Änderungen haben hier nichts verloren.

Wenn du uns bei der Aktualisierung der Karte unterstützen möchtest bist du jedoch herzlich willkommen und bei Fragen ist immer jemand da. Also immer raus damit

happy mapping
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146450922
flohoff (2024-01-19 18:10:33+00:00): Danke - Ich habe das gerade in der routenüberwachung gesehen das es kaputt gegangen ist. Sonst hätte ich das jetzt reverted.

Flo
paulbrunner (2024-01-19 21:48:56+00:00): Ciao minardil,

grazie per tutte le tue contribuzioni! Nel tag "opening_hours" no c'è bisogno di mettere un ";" alla fine, per esempio su https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11531451439 basterebbe 

Mo-Fr 09:00-17:00; Sa-Su off

C'è anche un validatore qua se ti serve: https://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/

Un saluto e buona mappatura,
Paul
SystemSmart (2024-02-17 18:44:25+00:00): grr
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-19 17:00:15+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11531432666

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Chris Fleming (2024-01-23 13:33:33+00:00): There is a destination:lanes that can be used for this. See:  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:destination#Destinations_per_lane

there are also some examples on that page. Give me a shout if you have any questions.
jamiescott95 (2024-01-26 08:55:02+00:00): I take it that for roundabouts to use:
turn:lanes=left|through|right
where as if its a junction to use:
Relations (1): Left Turn Only
pio2_122 (2024-01-19 17:54:53+00:00): Ta linia „miała powód bycia”, ponieważ stanowiła granicę miasta i była powiązana ze stosowną relacją: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3011963
Tutaj zostało wyjaśnione dlaczego linie granic nie mają tagów: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/automatyczne-usuwanie-boundary-administrative-z-lini-propozycja-bota/92449/5

Zmiany wycofane.
Makifr (2024-01-19 17:57:17+00:00): To niewiedziałem o tym, przepraszam.
ivanbranco (2024-01-21 21:25:23+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3408442/history

why did you change the Cape Verde Islands from place=archipelago to natural=reef? This broke the rendering of all islands.
ivanbranco (2024-01-21 21:30:17+00:00): Also could you consider using more descriptive changeset comments? "bing, knowledge" doesn't help other mappers understand what you edited. For that there's already the "source" field (or imagery_used for Bing). See this page for some examples: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
Bratananio (2024-01-22 07:00:44+00:00): Excuse me. That was not my intention. I try to reset it into archipelago.
Bratananio (2024-01-22 07:08:50+00:00): I just have changed it. 
Thank you for the notice.
B.
mikeocool (2024-01-19 21:41:09+00:00): Hey there -- 
Rather than deleting roads that aren't accessible to public, it's best to tag them as access=private.

That'll prevent someone else form coming along, re-adding the road since it's visible in the satellite imagery, but should be respected by routers, and is generally reflected by most renderers.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-19 17:10:16+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/464857329

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
MxxCon (2024-02-04 06:45:01+00:00): As documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:website the address must explicitly include http:// or https:// as appropriate for a given site. Just bare domain name is not a valid value.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146452080
Chris Fleming (2024-01-23 13:30:43+00:00): Hi, for the lane count if there are 2 lanes here reading the wiki page on this https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lanes 

Even if there aren't neccessarily 2 lanes maked on the ground this is okay provided this is the way the roundaboutn is used.
mcliquid (2024-01-19 17:58:19+00:00): Hi,

please note: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
MxxCon (2024-01-19 22:00:41+00:00): You added rooms=0 to hotel 4334850949?🤨 That doesn't seem correct.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146452176
vmu42 (2024-01-19 22:14:40+00:00): Just fixed it, my bad
vmu42 (2024-01-19 22:15:04+00:00): Do I need to redo the entire changeset?
MxxCon (2024-01-19 22:58:51+00:00): No, if you fixed that hotel, that's fine.
Just in the future try to group your changes into smaller geographic regions similar to what mcliquid mentioned.
trigpoint (2024-02-17 14:33:17+00:00): What is the source of this edit?

There is no evidence of this being oneway on https://www.bing.com/maps?cp=51.300557%7E0.931243&lvl=18.6&pi=-14.8&style=x&dir=19.9

Cheers Phil
NastassiaKalesnikava (2024-02-20 13:34:14+00:00): We discussed this place in the note. However, you are right that it is actually difficult to tell whether a vanway is present in a given area. I have removed it. 
Thank you!
trigpoint (2024-02-20 15:00:07+00:00): Thank you
CurlingMan13 (2024-01-20 06:07:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted in part or full.  The feature is still visible in aerial imagery.  Access tags should be used instead of deleting the feature.  You can read why deletion is not the solution here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

Please don’t do that; in OSM, if a trail/road exists but is not usable (due to being closed, private or simliar) we use the so-called “access tags” to record the fact.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146466501
Moonwalker008 (2024-01-20 20:18:31+00:00): Hallo Hendrik,
ich habe deine Änderungen nochmal ein bisschen durch lokales Wissen verfeinert.
Gruß, Moonwalker008
Henry572 (2024-01-20 21:33:21+00:00): Danke, ich hatte wegen des Hinweises https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3815061 hier etwas gemacht, dann ist es jetzt durch dein lokales Wissen wohl wieder auf dem neusten Stand. 
Gruß, Hendrik
ntzm (2024-02-18 12:43:08+00:00): Was this a temporary change? Because I checked today and this is definitely oneway. It's only not oneway for bicycles
coolmule0 (2024-03-19 17:52:46+00:00): You are correct, that's my bad I think. There was construction works going on when I passed it, and some construction vehicles driving down the other way
NieWnen (2024-01-19 18:05:24+00:00): Data w odwrotnym formacie :P
yyyy-mm-dd
Jarek 🚲 (2024-01-25 20:43:32+00:00): Hi Himké,

Community consensus as it stands now is to not add prefixes in areas that mostly do not have them. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Canada/Tagging_guidelines#Reference_(ref_tag) . As no roads in GTA and Hamilton currently have prefixes, please do not add them without discussing this more widely.

Cheers,
Jarek
mcliquid (2024-01-20 07:00:27+00:00): Hi,

please note: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
wehoye (2024-01-23 18:47:59+00:00): Certainly! To optimize your tags, consider incorporating relevant keywords related to your content, such as "delta-9," into the meta tags and description. Ensure the tags accurately represent the content and use variations of the keyword for better search visibility. Additionally, focus on concise and descriptive tags that provide a clear understanding of your content to improve search engine optimization. For more specific guidance, explore resources like Google's Keyword Planner to identify popular and relevant keywords for your niche. Visit https://hempireinnovations.com/collections/delta-9 for additional insights on delta-9 products.
bxl-forever (2024-01-19 19:03:13+00:00): Hello,

Thanks for this.  Your description is very clear, thanks.  In such a situation, the recommended tag is "bicycle=use_sidepath".  This is because routers will always consider that "bicycle=no" means a complete no.  But there are some cases where a cyclist may legally use the main road (for instance when this is the only possibility to do a left turn).  Good navigation software know the difference, so we suggest you’ll change it into bicycle=use sidepath, it is safer.  For this road, it looks like it won’t make a huge difference but it’s a good habit to take anyway.

Hope this helps.  Happy mapping!
JoachimClaeys (2024-01-19 19:12:24+00:00): Thanks. I was looking for the option - but could not find it amongst the listed "bicylce" options. Can you check?
bxl-forever (2024-01-19 19:34:28+00:00): That’s right, the online editor, which is a very limited piece of software, does not have it.  I am used to type tags manually.  In the online editor you can achieve this by scrolling down to the "Tags" box.
AndyB_66 (2024-01-19 20:51:46+00:00): Proszę, byś nadawał swoim zestawom zmian nazwy, mówiące o tym, co dodałeś, poprawiłeś lub usunąłeś. Społeczność OSM będzie Ci wdzięczna za stosowanie do obowiązujących tu zasad: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian.
Langlaeufer (2024-01-20 19:57:01+00:00): Hallo ,
willkommen bei OSM.

kleine ANmerkung. zu deiner Änderung: Service=yard ist ein Wert der ausschlißlich für Gleise verweindet wird:

Es ist hier durchaus übklich und  richtig keinen sevice=* Wert zu setzten.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:service=yard?uselang=de
LutWeb (2024-01-21 17:19:21+00:00): Danke, tag ist entfernt
VLD549 (2024-01-24 16:44:49+00:00): Hi, the site indicates the stop doesn't exist anymore. Could you share perhaps another source where the name change is mentioned the way you suggest it?
https://www.delijn.be/nl/haltes/508193/

Thank you!
multimob (2024-01-24 17:08:56+00:00): You are providing a web link to stop 508193 which no longer exists.  That is true… but this changeset correctly deleted it, so what is the problem? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2778102142/history

Please provide the exact reference (OSM object) of what you believe to be incorrect from this changeset, and please explain what "name change" we made and that you claim to be wrong.
Myazyk (2024-01-27 12:32:38+00:00): На будинку №36 по вул. Хмельницького ростуть дерева?
Привіт
Це якийсь модерновий будинок із деревами і не з кутами по 90 градусів?
Jakka (2024-01-19 19:23:07+00:00): aandacht grondcontact gebouwen intekenen op basis van GRB laag niet luchtbeelden
eggie (2024-01-19 20:28:18+00:00): Dag Wouter  
review_requested
Lijkt me oke. Je zou footway=alley kunnen toevoegen aan het brandganggedeelte.
MVG
eggie
Olf_osm (2024-01-25 12:37:17+00:00): Il y a désormais un doublon de centrale solaire sur les ombrières car le générateur était déjà tagué sur le building=carport
NicolasGrosjean (2024-01-25 16:59:56+00:00): J'ai enlevé mes 2 ajouts sur les 2 building=carport