piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
gallseife (2023-01-14 09:56:07+00:00): wombatmaper ist offensichtlich emotional envolviert. Er war nach eigener AUssage auch schon persöhnlich in Lützerath. Es sit auch nicht sein einziger Edit dieser Art. Hier zB https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/130843609#map=16/51.0843/6.4079 hat er eine weiter, derartige Privatbenamung eingeführt.
Bei Keyenberg gibt es von anderen Usern noch andere Edits dieser Art.
Kannst du bitte den Forumsbeitrag zu den privaten und emotionalen Bearbeitungen im Rahmen der Abbaggerrungen machen? Ich beteilige mich dann dort.
Zandu (2023-11-16 15:06:59+00:00): Not sure what the suspect word is. Dragoon Glen is the name of the park where the trees are.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131246827
DressyPear4 (2023-01-14 03:39:06+00:00): Olá, não adicione o que não existe.
Você pode representar uma árvore com ponto, mas use a etiqueta correta.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131247259
andrewsuzuki (2023-01-14 04:19:30+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM. Thanks for fixing the typo in the website. Any reason you removed soul_food from the cuisine tag though?
soapandshampoo (2023-01-14 11:48:38+00:00): There's no reason to remove soul_food. I must have misclicked. Good catch!
soapandshampoo (2023-01-14 11:54:16+00:00): I went back to Organic Maps to try and fix it, but seems like the app has a preset list of cuisines, and because soul_food isn't on it, it removed the tag when I edited it.
dpschep (2023-01-16 21:51:42+00:00): Hi, what is your source for the footway in Holywood Cemetery that connects to Dobson Street? The cemetery very strictly controls access, and as far as I know there isn't a pedestrian entrance to the cemetery next to Clark Springs Elementary.
Omnific (2023-01-16 22:09:39+00:00): fixed
dpschep (2023-01-17 13:58:08+00:00): Thanks!
jmaspons (2023-08-10 15:25:13+00:00): Hola, estic preparant https://osm-catalan.github.io/monitorOSM/web/limits.html i veig que has canviat el topònim en català. No és el que recomana ni l'IEC ni la viquipèdia. Hi ha alguna justificació de per què Sançà és més recomanable que Censà?
jmaspons (2023-08-10 15:25:42+00:00): disculpa, m'he equivocat de conjunt de canvis
SomeoneElse (2023-01-13 23:18:33+00:00): Can you please use more descriptive changeset comments than just "mapping with Strava and Sentinel 2022"?
Say what sort of things you are adding and what sort of information from Strava and what other imagery you're using before adding anything.
SomeoneElse (2023-01-13 23:23:01+00:00): Also, using any of the available imagery in iD, I think that you have the northern part of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1131826557 join the road in the wrong place.
sputinyk (2023-01-20 23:00:06+00:00): What do you expect me to add? For me it's clear, I used layer Strava and Sentinel to add paths. What kind of details do you want me to put in? something like this: "I traced a route that starts at such a coordinate, which has 57 nodes at such coordinates, which has a surface of the type such and such, which was built in 2020", I have never seen anyone be so charged about changeset titles as I am, if for that, I don't understand why only I have to do this, since I see several people putting a generic description for changesets very similar to mine or with much worse quality, which by the way, I check the bad quality edits in my country. And well, none of these people are getting warnings and blocks after another like I am, what do you want? scare away people who are constantly mapping? I already stopped adding notes in Chile and talked to the mappers there. In Colombia, the note strategy worked very well and thousands of km of roads are being added there with the help of the notes I created, but ok, I already talked to the community and we agreed that through maproulette.
SomeoneElse (2023-01-21 01:11:48+00:00): > For me it's clear, I used layer Strava and Sentinel to add paths.

Well, saying that would be a start.
The reason that I'm asking about sources is twofold - one is that Strava can be quite unreliable - although it'll show you a rough route from A to B, it will seem to "cut corners" because each trace is just a series of dots.  The other is that the sentinel imagery that I can see in JOSM (such as "EOx cloudless Sentinel-2 2021") is very poor quality.  Comparing that with Bing at https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/-14.87550/-46.99489 shows the problem.
Your changeset comment says "Sentinel 2022 "; what is the URL for that?
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-01-21 12:52:32+00:00): Sorry, it's actually Sentinel 2021. I don't just check the route with Strava, first I see if it's on Strava and then I go to the Sentinel website and check if that route actually has a new layout that is different from the one on Maxar or if it is a new route and map.
eggie (2023-01-14 06:54:01+00:00): Dag Arno.. Je vraagt feedback. Het lijkt me helemaal correct. Het was ooit een verkeerde import vanuit de data van Kaartenmaker AND in 2007.
MVG
eggie
ALu68 (2023-01-13 23:34:23+00:00): November2019	84140674	way	236368956	Tümpel
November2019	83052036	way	787685341	Tümpel
November2019	85974390	way	809893231	Tümpel
November2019	86881187	way	817582944	Tümpel
November2019	131144310	way	1130884861	Tümpel
SherbetS (2023-01-15 22:16:00+00:00): Actual source is: Florida Department of Environmental Protection
Soshal Distan Singh (2023-01-14 00:54:30+00:00): >highway=tertiary

Посмотрите, что такое tertiary: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:highway%3Dtertiary

Это явно не тянет.
wireguy (2023-01-14 02:16:30+00:00): Ginger, way 1131852789 is tagged as tee, but is clearly a bunker.
Ginger Lover (2023-01-14 02:23:32+00:00): Which hole is this on?
Ginger Lover (2023-01-14 02:26:52+00:00): Found it and fixed it
wireguy (2023-01-14 02:31:11+00:00): 7 and 11  the tee boxes are missing from 11 too
the gree on 7 looks wrong
6 has an extra tee blob

boxes usually have corners, press Q key on the square/rectangle area and it will make them look nicer
Ginger Lover (2023-01-14 02:38:11+00:00): fixed
wireguy (2023-01-14 02:42:29+00:00): not 11
Ginger Lover (2023-01-14 02:47:06+00:00): Done
Horza (2023-01-17 17:55:25+00:00): Hi,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap, thanks for adding things.

Since you are using iD you can use Q or right click and click on the square to make right angles. It's very helpful if you plan on adding a lot of buildings (though it is harder to get it to work well with complex geometries)

Horza
Polarbear (2023-01-24 22:52:08+00:00): Hallo Marlix20,
du hattest hier vermutlich eine vorfristige "Öffnung" der Auffahrt Grenzallee aus CS 130869312 reparieren wollen. 
Leider führte deine Reparaturroute über die offene Baugrube der Tunneleinfahrt und entsprach nicht der Realität. 
Ich habe das im Zuge des Reverts des anderen CS mit repariert. 

Viele Grüsse
wireguy (2023-01-14 02:12:17+00:00): Ginger, 
The building you added with a description of Club House seems to already be tagged with a Hebrew School.   Can you correct?
The houses you are adding are not shaped very accurately, try outlining them better, and if you press the Q key, the corners will square.
Some of the holes, 9 for example, the green and fairways overlap each other.
Ginger Lover (2023-01-14 02:20:51+00:00): I removed that .. my mistake
wireguy (2023-01-14 02:15:17+00:00): Ginger, these unsquare buildings appear more likely to be the clubhouse.   You may want to outline the parking area, as it is rendering as grass.
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-20 17:51:50+00:00): Please use more descriptive changeset comments.

What did you change and why?

Refer here for a good guideline:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset_comment
mariotomo (2023-01-17 13:40:53+00:00): aquí no solo borraste claves "obsoletas" sino que borraste la información que tenían. está basado en observación personal (sé que vives en el área), o sólo querías quitar unos avisos 'osmose'?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131250986
mariotomo (2023-01-29 20:06:53+00:00): cuando tengas tiempo, consideras mi pregunta? gracias.
Horza (2023-01-17 17:48:26+00:00): Hi,

Why are you adding addresses as names? There's already an address field for addresses.

Thanks,
Horza
Allison P (2023-01-17 20:06:02+00:00): Please press Q to square buildings after drawing them as well.
DressyPear4 (2023-01-14 04:20:35+00:00): Olá, track geralmente são ignoradas por apps de roteamento, aqui https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/345034463
você rebaixou a classificação de uma via que parece ser bem expressiva.
Analise melhor se essas vias podem ser usadas como rota para carros e motocicletas.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131251377
CurlingMan13 (2023-07-29 23:23:26+00:00): FYI, areas such as parking or leisure (shuffleboard, etc.) should not be tagged with "Area=yes".  It is redundant for this type of feature.
TheSwavu (2024-04-01 04:04:11+00:00): Hi,

You have put https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15310289 into two route masters https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/349554 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/349555. By definition it can only be one. Would you please delete the one it is not supposed to be in please, as I don't know enough about Vic trains to know.


Thanks.
futongrab (2023-01-14 06:39:20+00:00): Hi there, thanks for updating the bike lane info on Hwy 17.
I've noticed you've removed the Hwy 91 Connector ramp and merged directly with E/B Hwy 17, but there is a concrete barrier extending beyond River Rd exit, so I've redone that change. The River Rd exit ramp is not accessible from Hwy 17 eastbound.
I travel this area mainly by vehicle and am not sure what exact route bicycle travels on this particular stretch, so an update would be appreciated.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-01-19 13:32:17+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3524376 ?
Frank Peng (2023-01-14 06:58:14+00:00): It's unknown if the toilet paper and the blue object were removed from the tree behind Hill Hall after Passport Camp 2022. If those things were to be removed from this tree, then how would they be removed? Also the camper who threw toilet paper onto this tree was kicked out of camp on the morning of July 22, 2022 for breaking rules.
Frank Peng (2023-01-14 07:26:48+00:00): For more about the camper that threw toilet paper on the tree behind Hill Hall, my experience with that camper, and my experience after that camper got kicked out of camp, see my comments made in changeset 128967926. It fully tells exactly what happened during that time in Passport Camp 2022. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128967926
Frank Peng (2023-01-14 07:36:50+00:00): It also tells my experience at camp with my church youth group during the time when that camper threw toilet paper from my dorm room and onto a tree.
Frank Peng (2023-01-14 07:37:05+00:00): I attended Passport Camp 2022 in Greensboro College in Greensboro, NC with my church youth group from July 18-23, 2022.
Frank Peng (2023-01-15 05:55:33+00:00): Passport Camp 2023 will be at Converse University in Spartanburg, SC. Converse University has access to coin laundry facilities, has an indoor swimming pool, indoor gymnasium with basketball court, sand-volleyball court, student center with snack machines, PASSPORT store and campus bookstore, and 24 hour security. It has an ample amount of classrooms, vast green space, a beautiful art studio and a perfectly-sized auditorium. Converse University is a close-knit campus meaning that everything is within a short walk, making groups love how easy it is to navigate the campus. It has flexible dining, pool and sport facilities, and tons of beautiful green space to play or hang out.
https://passportcamps.org/location/converse/
If anyone knows the reasons behind moving Passport camp from Greensboro, NC to Spartanburg, SC for Summer 2023, I would love to know.
Allison P (2023-01-15 19:29:49+00:00): This information is not appropriate for OSM. No data consumer would want this data and it is unverifiable. Also note that changeset comments are not a discussion forum.
Frank Peng (2023-01-17 05:25:31+00:00): Wait, I honestly never knew what I typed in this discussion would not be appropriate for OSM.
Frank Peng (2023-01-18 21:43:59+00:00): If that information I typed in here is not appropriate for OSM, then why wouldn't I want to be typing in information like that in the changeset discussion?
Allison P (2023-01-18 22:25:53+00:00): It contains personal information on both yourself and others. It is more suitable for a private, personal diary. No one else is interested in the information. Changeset discussions are for discussing... well, changes. Who threw toilet paper in a tree at some Bible camp is relevant to no one, and even mentioning that you went there, especially as a minor, is a risk to your personal safety.

Please just stick to contributions like adding detail to bus stops or creating POI and leave your personal life personal.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-09-13 05:59:28+00:00): name=模範眼鏡
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5168510997

shop=opticial ? Is it optician ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Doptician ) or something else?
iigmir (2023-11-13 17:14:23+00:00): hi mr Konieczny i fixed it: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143979556
pza (2023-02-06 22:43:21+00:00): A few comments.
I don't understand the logic of why we don't have the pedestrian way on George St from Bond -> Bridge, or near QVB (Market -> Park)?
I think access=no is incorrect correct here, as there is pedestrian access. The newly closed parts (George from Hunter -> Bridge, including side street stubs) are blocked off with full width concrete barriers so zero traffic can get through - no local deliveries, no emergency.
kurisubrooks (2023-02-06 23:08:54+00:00): Hi, I didn't include the pedestrian way from Bond to Bridge as there's already adequate sidewalk coverage, with plans to build out the sidewalk and remove the former vehicle lanes completely later this year. I haven't been able to survey Market to Park but I haven't touched that section as it was done by someone else, but there is access from the hotel laneway from Pitt down to Park that I believe still exists to traffic. If you want to add a pedestrian area through the centre of the tram tracks from Market to Park however, I wouldn't be opposed to it (so long as you leave where George Street comes out onto Market Street as that's where there is still a traffic lane).
Regarding access=no, foot still is designated foot=yes, but you can specify if you want motor_vehicle=no, emergency=no, etc... + foot=yes instead if you'd like rather than a blanket access=no + foot=yes.
kurisubrooks (2023-02-06 23:11:50+00:00): I'm mostly just armchair mapping from information sourced from public documents and as much recent aerial imagery as I have access to, so if you are able to survey and notice anything that doesn't match up with my changes, please go ahead and update things to the best of your knowledge 👍🏻
lyctkel (2023-12-04 17:06:24+00:00): Hi Pan,
at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10554105941 you wrote
recycling:glass_bottles=378
While recycling:glass_bottles should be yes or no.
I suppose you meant
recycling:glass_bottles=yes
ref=378.
Is that correct?
Regards
lyctkel
Pan (2023-12-04 21:30:37+00:00): Thanks for bringing that up. I haf made a typo and now have corrected it.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-01-20 06:45:12+00:00): DWG issue. User wasn't aware of the massive problems they were causing. Agreed to all edits being reverted & promises to be much more careful in future: Changeset: 131494310
Yunkers (2023-01-14 08:58:54+00:00): Hej, nie widziałem żadnej ustawy przedłużającej DW780 na Obwodnicę Bielan, mogę prosić źródło?
Tomek Powęzka (2023-01-14 10:13:02+00:00): W tym momencie nie mogę znaleźć uchwały w tej sprawie, niemniej była taka, która wskazywała obwodnicę Bielan jako alternatywny przebieg DW780 określony w załączniku do uchwały jako „DW780-a”. Niezależnie od tego, Prezydent Miasta Krakowa (jako zarządca dróg w Krakowie) podpisywał już co najmniej dwa porozumienia z Zarządem Województwa Małopolskiego (jako zarządcą dróg wojewódzkich) w zakresie przejęcia obowiązków zarządcy drogi odcinka DW780 będącego obejściem Bielan o długości 287 metrów znajdujących się poza granicami administracyjnymi Krakowa – więc także m.in. z tego wynika status tego odcinka drogi jako wojewódzkiej
Yunkers (2023-01-14 12:43:05+00:00): Dzięki za odpowiedź. Sprawdzę jeszcze poprawność tej zmiany - widziałem tylko uchwały usuwające przebieg drogi z Krakowa, nie znalazłem takiej która by dodawała taki odcinek, więc jakby ta droga była wojewódzka od dawna? Ale to w wolnym czasie :)
Dawid2849 (2023-02-02 18:28:44+00:00): Jeśli zmiana jest poprawna to trzeba jeszcze zmienić relację DW780
Yunkers (2023-02-03 18:08:22+00:00): Jeszcze nie wiem czy jest poprawna. Nie znalazłem źródła potwierdzającego ani zaprzeczającego temu przebiegowi
mueschel (2023-01-21 11:00:26+00:00): Was steht hier auf dem Kreisel?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10554132445
gzin (2023-01-21 12:07:20+00:00): Ui, danke für die Info. Da ist mir mit der Auto-completion was rein gerutscht, was da definitiv so nicht hin gehört. Es sollte ein highway=street_lamp sein, habe es jetzt ausgebessert.
Danke nochmals und LG, Günther
mavl (2023-01-15 07:30:47+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок удалил теги детского сада со здания.  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/309768247  
  
Напишите, пожалуйста, почему не правильно ставить теги детского сада на здание, если детский сад полностью занимает здание?
mavl (2023-01-15 07:37:10+00:00): И ещё почему удалена точка?  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2394103967/history
mavl (2023-01-15 07:43:41+00:00): Здравствуйте. Напишите, пожалуйста, почему удалена точка?  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2931361203
38446 (2023-03-31 12:28:07+00:00): Beachte bitte, dass Fahrbibliotheken keine (öffentlichen) Verkehrsmittel sind. Dafür gibt es den Tag https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dmobile_library
Node 10554095684 habe ich entsprechend korrigiert.
mueschel (2023-01-21 11:06:03+00:00): Hi,
could you checkt his building, it got a strange 'archi' tag:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1131546549
V-Li (2023-01-14 16:41:25+00:00): Hallo,

du kannst Flächen über das Kontextmenü (Rechtsklick) rechtwinklig machen.  Dein eigener Name darf nicht  im Gebäudename auftauchen.

Außer "parking access" hast du noch mehr Dinge geändert. Wenn du eine Begutachtung möchtest, solltest du kleinteiliger (thematisch oder geographisch) mappen.

Grüße

Christian
Hazelnut0241 (2023-01-14 19:01:39+00:00): Makes sense! Not sure how my name got into it..
gismountains (2023-01-14 09:55:52+00:00): Description wrong: for Belalp
eggie (2023-01-14 11:14:41+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback...   De juiste procedure is het oude adres intact laten en alleen de bedrijfsinfo verwijderen.
Nu is adresnode nummer 34 verdwenen van de kaart.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-01-14 11:25:33+00:00): Adressen heb ik hersteld...  
Waar zit nu de Stonka... Raadhuisplein of Dorpsstraat?
Je hebt beide straatnamen ingevuld.. ?

MVG
eggie
Chris Be (2023-01-15 09:02:31+00:00): De ingang zit aan de Dorpsstraat.

Groeten,
Chris
eggie (2023-01-15 09:10:22+00:00): Oke...
Foutjes worden trouwens niemand aangerekend.
Maar het gaat even over het juiste (post) adres.
Is dat Raadhuisplein 3 of Dorpsstraat 3..?
Ik kan het op internet niet vinden.
Groet..
eggie
eggie (2023-01-15 10:28:54+00:00): Ik heb de Stonka overgezet naar adresnode Dorpsstraat 3
Groet
eggie
eggie (2023-01-14 11:16:12+00:00): Alle begin is moeilijk. Dit heb je er van gemaakt... maar het is beter op de adresnode nr 3 bij te taggen
addr:postcode	2751AX	2751AX;2751BA
addr:street	Raadhuisplein	Raadhuisplein;Dorpsstraat
culture		polish
name		Stonka
shop		convenience

MVG
eggie
Chris Be (2023-01-15 09:01:11+00:00): Ok, ik zal proberen beter mijn best te doen.

De ingang van die Stonka zit trouwens aan de Dorpsstraat.
StC (2024-02-13 21:22:22+00:00): Bonjour,

sauf erreur de ma part ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire de randonnée (la relation avec le tag network=lwn à laquelle appartient le chemin). Je m'occupe de la réparation.

St.
Harfeur (2023-01-16 22:37:36+00:00): Bonjour, je viens de vérifier votre changement, et celui-ci a l'air correct.
Merci beaucoup pour votre aide !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131256136
pitfire (2023-01-14 10:28:30+00:00): Hi nilix
könnte möglicherweise präziser mit "Tag:shop=caravan" erfasst werden.
Gruß pitfire
maestro_alubia (2023-01-15 07:51:45+00:00): Hallo, du hast den straßenbegleitenden Weg in der Binger Str. von einem Fußweg zu einem gemeinsamen Geh-/Radweg geändert.

Das entspricht aber nicht der Realität, denn der Weg ist mit Zeichen 239 + "Rad frei" eindeutig als Gehweg beschildert, der mit dem Rad (in Schrittgeschwindigkeit und Wartepflicht ggü. Fußverkehr) befahren werden darf.

Siehe auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen_kartieren

Bitte daher wieder in highway=footway, bicycle=yes zurückändern.
ManuelB701 (2023-01-16 11:05:28+00:00): Okay, habe ich nicht gewusst, die Änderungen wurden entfernt.

Zugegeben, dass es dort einen empfohlenen Pfad für Fahrräder gibt, hat mich schon verwirrt, deswegen meine (fehlerhaften) Änderungen.
maestro_alubia (2023-01-16 11:46:50+00:00): Danke!

Das ist von der Stadt wirklich schlecht gemacht dort. Zum Glück wird es dann im Zuge des anstehenden Umbaus der Binger Str. für die neue Straßenbahnstrecke einen durchgängigen Radweg geben.

foot=designated war übrigens richtig, da der Weg ja per Zeichen 239 dem Fußverkehr gewidmet ist. (Siehe auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen_kartieren)

Ich habe das gerade schnell selbst korrigiert.
DD1GJ (2023-02-12 19:49:35+00:00): Komplettlöschung des Hauses rückgängig gemacht und FeWo korrekt eingetragen

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf
Rom1 (2023-01-17 08:59:17+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai restauré ce cheminement car il est correctement identifié par son accès privé. Merci.
NorthCrab (2023-01-15 02:30:23+00:00): Witaj, nie byłem w stanie zweryfikować istnienia tych stacji benzynowych. Ich umiejscowienie jest bardzo dziwne dlatego usunąłem do czasu wyjaśnień. Pozdrawiam!
theophrastos (2023-01-14 10:00:12+00:00): Neubauten Meedensdorf
gallseife (2023-01-14 10:29:08+00:00): Das sich die Sache in Lützerath erledigt hat ist klar. Es stellt sich aber die Frage wie im allgemeinen mit solchen privaten und durchaus emotionalen Eintragungen umgegangen wird: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/tagebau-lutzerath/7859
aixbrick (2023-01-14 10:37:16+00:00): Ich denke, das muss je nach Situation entschieden werden. Hier habe ich aber erstmal wieder das gelöscht, was selbst mit viel Wohlwollen nicht mehr da ist/da sein kann.
Leskiandr (2023-02-09 14:32:46+00:00): В даний час, гадаю, недоречно додавати назви абощо військовим об'єктам
eggie (2023-01-14 11:29:46+00:00): Dag ErEr   Probeer bij te taggen op de bestaande adresnodes of de winkel samen te voegen met de bestaande adresnodes. Dus geen adressen zelf aanmaken. Die zijn er al.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-01-14 11:35:00+00:00): Wat ik zo tegenkwam heb ik samengevoegd. Met de BAG adresnodes mag je gewoon schuiven, Het is even zoeken waar ze zijn.
ErEr99 (2023-01-14 12:24:05+00:00): Helder, dank!
BCNorwich (2023-01-15 08:11:01+00:00): Hi, There is access to the public footpath, (Way: 1131926552) at least on foot. Therefore the tag access=no is not valid. So I've removed the access=no tag. Did you mean to tag it as vehicle=no?

I also removed a duplicate section of the track near the ponds.

Regards Bernard.
Paul Mallard (2023-01-15 13:56:19+00:00): Hi, thanks for spotting that.  Yes it should be access by foot only as it is a footpath not a bridleway.  Its marked on OS maps and it looks well used.  The footpath sign is missing at the Blisworth end but it is easily spotted  by the side of the last house.