piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Akrimullah (2024-05-30 13:09:13+00:00): Keep up your good work. Any specific POIs added to OSM by your edit will be useful for OSM data users.
Akrimullah (2024-05-30 13:07:08+00:00): Keep up your good work. Any specific POIs added to OSM by your edit will be useful for OSM data users.
Tomasz Herud (2024-11-19 12:50:04+00:00): Hej, od kiedy przy ROD Jaśmin mamy DDR?
oli_szew (2024-11-19 13:38:11+00:00): Dobry, zaznaczyłem tam DDR bo to był i zarazem nadal jest DDR (na tamtym odcinku). Zgodnie z oznaczeniem i przygotowanymi wyjazdami (te takie brameczki żeby rowerzysta nie wyleciał na drogę) to był DDR, tylko kwestia jest taka że już lata temu ktoś słupy i znaki C-13 zezłomował, ostały się te arkierki hamujące  a zarządca chyba nie kwapi się do wymian bo nowa droga rowerowa idze wzdłuż ulicy. Teoretycznie można to zostawić jako polną czy poprostu ścieżkę, ale uznałem że bliżej prawdy będzie DDR. Choć teraz po namyśle to może i CPR bo piesi też mogą się tam prouszać bez przeszkód.
Tomasz Herud (2024-11-19 13:45:03+00:00): Skoro zarządca zdjął C-13 to odcinek przestał być drogą dla rowerów. CPR też nie jest jeżeli nie ma C-13/16.
oli_szew (2024-11-19 13:52:56+00:00): no to zmienię na drogę polna, skoro ma byc poprawniej
Akrimullah (2024-05-30 13:08:25+00:00): Keep up your good work. Any specific POIs added to OSM by your edit will be useful for OSM data users.
Akrimullah (2024-05-30 13:07:41+00:00): Keep up your good work. Any specific POIs added to OSM by your edit will be useful for OSM data users.
Akrimullah (2024-05-30 13:05:21+00:00): Keep up your good work. Any specific POIs added to OSM by your edit will be useful for OSM data users.
arafin (2024-06-17 17:15:32+00:00): Thanks for your contribution. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151998831
arafin (2024-06-17 17:13:41+00:00): Thanks for your mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151998897
Akrimullah (2024-05-31 10:48:49+00:00): Great POIs addition! very useful for nav apps!
arafin (2024-06-17 17:12:28+00:00): Thanks for mapping.#OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151998948
Akrimullah (2024-05-31 10:47:57+00:00): Good work mate. Very detailed POIs
arafin (2024-06-17 17:11:43+00:00): Thanks for mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151998966
Akrimullah (2024-05-31 10:47:33+00:00): Good work mate. Very detailed POIs
arafin (2024-06-17 17:11:02+00:00): Thanks for mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151999027
Akrimullah (2024-05-31 10:46:46+00:00): Good work mate. Very detailed POIs
ZLima12 (2024-06-23 22:42:19+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for contributing. Unfortunately I've had to revert this classification change, as NY-201 doesn't quite meet the standard for "motorway" under the current NYS classification guidelines. You can read more about them here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/TMP-Proposal:_New_York/Highway_Classification

In short, motorway is used for not only the highest performance roads, but for roads that are both controlled-access and the highest level of importance. Route 17 is a good example here; NY-201 might be controlled-access, but it's definitely not as important as Route 17. To tag a road that is limited or controlled access, but isn't important enough to be a motorway, you can use highway=primary+expressway=yes.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Best,
John
arafin (2024-06-17 17:09:32+00:00): Thanks for mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151999136
Akrimullah (2024-05-31 10:45:41+00:00): Good work mate. Very detail POIs
arafin (2024-06-17 17:08:12+00:00): Thanks for mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151999179
arafin (2024-06-17 17:02:05+00:00): Thanks for mapping.#OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151999221
Glassman (2024-05-29 19:23:45+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.

I'd recommend updating the government=yes tag to government=transportation. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:government for help with the government tag.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151999302
JLZIMMERMANN (2024-06-07 07:29:30+00:00): Bonjour,
J'ai regardé sur le site https://maps.mybus.io/bollene/voyager/plan-du-reseau/
et en cliquant sur la ligne 1 le tracé communiqué sur le site ne va pas jusqu'au 'chemin de la Levade'.
Qu'est-ce qui fait que ce tracé a été prolongé aussi loin ?
Merci de m'éclairer
Jean-Louis
mavOsaure (2024-06-05 22:08:03+00:00): - l'édition du chemin 
- building=commercial ne correspond pas (activité tertiare, cf wiki)
- le nom est ajouté en doublon, sans casse

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152306465
mavOsaure (2024-06-05 21:56:54+00:00): Le nom de la marque est ajouté en doublon dans "name" et sans respect de la casse

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152306286
mavOsaure (2024-06-05 21:46:09+00:00): La marque ne fait partie du du nom du garage
La marque doit être écrite avec une capitale.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152305989
mavOsaure (2024-06-05 21:47:13+00:00): La marque ne fait partie du du nom du garage
La marque doit être écrite avec une capitale.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152306011
roelant (2024-05-29 17:43:19+00:00): Accidentally closed this changeset without changing the comment. This changeset should've had as comment:

Split the stairs in to two stairways and footpaths respectively, based on https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4261474 and the photo there.
mikko_tamura (2024-05-29 23:09:56+00:00): do not use ALL CAPS in name=*
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152000446
dmfr (2024-06-14 21:54:23+00:00): Olá Daniel! Esta way 614300217 (EB1/JI de Ribeira Quente) tem uns metadados estranhos, nomeadamente uma morada nas Furnas, em vez de na Ribeira Quente. Também acho que a ref que está nessa escola corresponde na verdade ao código de uma escola nas Furnas. Podes verificar se se trata de um erro?
DanielAgos (2024-06-14 22:14:59+00:00): Olá, já não tenho os ficheiros que utilizei para mapear, portanto não consigo determinar onde surgiu o problema. De facto a morada e a ref são de uma escola nas furnas. E agora que pesquisei melhor, a way/614300085 está com as tags incorretas e deveria ter posto na way/284545544
KKS (2025-01-02 17:32:27+00:00): Вже якщо ділиш одну дорогу на дві (з якогось перепугу нафіг не потрібного) - то доробляй батьківську лінію як треба. А не я зроблю дубль, а з старою лінією *біться самі...
mikko_tamura (2024-05-29 23:06:05+00:00): please use place of worshop instead office
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152001484
mikko_tamura (2024-05-29 23:06:06+00:00): please use place of worshop instead office
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152001484
jxpsert (2025-06-29 10:15:42+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11942808471

"Gemeente Alkmaar" is een kopieerfoutje, gok ik?
FM2441 (2025-07-01 10:02:47+00:00): Beste jxpsert,

dank voor je oplettendheid, het was inderdaad een foutje van mij. Deze is hersteld.
aceman444 (2024-08-07 21:25:52+00:00): Zdravim, prosim uvadzajte skutocne zdroje udajov. Cisla domov asi na Ortofotomozaike nevidite. Dakujem
Spider 001757 (2024-08-09 17:29:38+00:00): Dobrý večer.
Prosím Vás, kde nebol zdroj skutočný? Zdroj informácií o budove vždy uvádzam štandardne k nej, v takmer všetkých prípadoch je to ZBGIS. Ortofotomozaiku používam ako podkladovú mapu a informácie o budove zbieram vždy zo stránky ZBGIS, napr. pre budovu Čadca 3403, ktorá bola upravovaná v tejto sade zmien z 29. mája: https://zbgis.skgeodesy.sk/mapka/sk/kataster/detail/ra_adresne_body/0/14624613?pos=49.461165,18.759342,21
Navyše, žiadne poloautomatické ani automatické činnosti nerobím, všetky adresy nahadzujem ručne. Preto nie je v značke imagery_used v sade zmien uvedená žiadna katastrálna mapa.
Ak si tak preveľmi prajete uvádzať zdroj údajov aj priamo do sady zmien, tak to teda budem robiť.
Ďakujem za porozumenie.
aceman444 (2024-08-09 18:39:57+00:00): Dakujem, rozumiem. Ak davate source priam na budovy tak tiez dobre. Ale bolo to tam uz predtym nez ste pridali adresu, cize obrys budovy je zo ZBGIS. Ze aj adresa je zo ZBGIS nebolo zrejme, preto keby to bolo na sade zmien, bolo by to jasne. Pripadne davame source:addr priamo na budovu, lebo moze byt obrys z ineho zdroja ako adresa. Dakujem
Spider 001757 (2024-08-09 19:19:01+00:00): Ďakujem aj sem za odpoveď. Ja tie obrysy kreslím tiež ručne, ale teda snažím sa tak, aby sa to čo najviac podobalo ZBGIS. Ono sa to asi dá cez JOSM urobiť, viem ten program používať, asi by sa dalo pracovať aj s tými automaticky dopĺňacími súbormi s údajmi zo ZBGIS, ale sú to tie automatické úpravy a potom to dopadne všelijako. V Krásne som postupne ručne dopĺňal adresy a zrazu prišla pred rokom nejaká automatická úprava a niektoré adresy nedalo na označené budovy súpisným číslom, ale na garáže/prístavby a pod., čiže preto to radšej nepoužívam.
NeisBot (2024-05-29 18:24:24+00:00): Hi PopikAlfa, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1287768044

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
vojtechzaboril (2024-05-29 18:31:30+00:00): Sry again for not spliting the changset. 
First change is at https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/40.25448/23.50247
The second: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/47.43687/11.87694

Sry again
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-03 09:11:00+00:00): Hello!

You used
sport=padel;g
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1286092312/history

Have you maybe meant
sport=padel
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
Freddo3000 (2025-05-04 18:58:22+00:00): Yes, it is a typo, somehow
miluethi (2024-07-03 22:42:50+00:00): Francisco,

Your building shapes are far too large compared to the sat imagery. Please narrow down the size of your shapes to match exactly the aerial imagery. 

Thank you.
MxxCon (2024-05-31 05:22:13+00:00): Hello.
Why did you delete valid tags from this building?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152003498
Yuliya Grinevich (2024-05-31 05:31:17+00:00): Hi!  

Otherwise I wasn't allowed to make any updates, because the fields were locked :(
I'm really sorry if I deleted something important.

Have a great day!
MxxCon (2024-05-31 05:34:09+00:00): The fields are locked because that feature has wikidata tag attached.
However you can make edits to other tags without deleting wikidata simply by scrolling down and editing them in the "Tags" section.
Yuliya Grinevich (2024-05-31 05:43:38+00:00): But the note said that to update property name, wikidata should be deleted, is it not true?

I needed to update the name as well, that was the reason why I deleted wikidata.

Sorry for any inconvenience.
MxxCon (2024-05-31 05:48:27+00:00): When you modified the name, iD suggested that it needs to be changed back, correct? That is happening because the name you wanted to add does not match what's in the wikidata database. https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q1123997
MxxCon (2024-05-31 05:50:50+00:00): And if you want to update brand-related tags, this would need to be updated https://nsi.guide/index.html?t=brands&k=tourism&v=hotel&tt=waldorf#waldorfastoria-665f74
Yuliya Grinevich (2024-05-31 05:52:52+00:00): Honestly, I don't remember what was suggested when I changed the name :((

Now I get it, thank you! (regarding brand as well)
Hufkratzer (2024-05-29 22:45:31+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1287778318 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1287778319 are no horse riding centres and no trail riding stations. They are outdoor riding arenas (or perhaps paddocks), and in OSM riding arenas are usually tagged leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian. Compare https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a#Riding_centre_(equestrian) and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1058126577#map=17/52.47159/17.03746&layers=P (example).
woodpeck_repair (2024-05-29 19:38:55+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 151425619, 151456472, 151497872.
KNaing (2024-07-31 04:09:43+00:00): ဒီနေရာCCC2024 မှာ ကိုမျိုးနိုင်ဝင်း ဆွဲထားတဲ့လမ်း highway=track ဟာ အရင်ရှိပြီးသား highway=unclassified ပေါ်မှာ ပြန်ဆွဲထားသလိုဖြစ်နေတယ် ... ရှိပြီးသားဆိုရင် ထပ်ဆွဲဖို့မလိုပါဘူး .... tag မှာ ပြောင်းလိုက်လို့ရပါတယ် ... အခြားလမ်းတွေနဲ့ ချိတ်ဆက်ဆွဲချင်ရင် ရှိပြီးသားလမ်းနဲ့ ဆက်ချိတ်ဆွဲလို့ရပါတယ် ...
ဆွဲထားပြီးသားကို မမြင်ခဲ့ဘူးလို့ဆိုလို့ရှိရင် Filter ကို ပြန်ဖြုတ်ထားလိုက်လို့ရပါတယ် ....
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152004669
Xvtn (2024-05-29 19:55:38+00:00): Uh oh. Something's wrong here... What did I mess up? Looking into it.
Xvtn (2024-05-29 19:57:46+00:00): Oh, I accidentally reverted changeset 51040082 instead of 151040082. Sorry about the large bbox.
yrtimiD (2024-05-29 23:50:22+00:00): Hi, I'd recommend you to join the discussion at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150279661 instead of starting revert-war
mrtmrtmrt (2024-05-31 16:52:09+00:00): Mr Massri has a history of political edits and has been blocked several times due to similar activities without engaging with the community. Now is back at it... https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Mr%20Massri/blocks
woodpeck_repair (2024-06-01 07:46:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152108851 where the changeset comment is: reverted and issued user block for edit warring; user Friendly_Ghost's edits are in line with guidance on active conflict mapping
Xvtn (2024-05-29 19:58:40+00:00): See comments at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152004946
treestryder (2024-07-19 03:43:45+00:00): Tourist attractions? 🤔

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11766261580
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11943008980
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11758712561
treestryder (2024-07-19 03:48:00+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dattraction
Trail_Caretaker (2024-07-19 13:31:34+00:00): I changed them to trail markers.  I think that is better.
treestryder (2024-07-19 13:37:31+00:00): tourism=information + information=route_marker

Is there really a sign with that name there?
treestryder (2024-07-21 02:24:51+00:00): Unless there really are signs that can be mapped, I have not found a mapping scheme currently developed for mapping MTB obstacles/elements.
Trail_Caretaker (2024-07-22 18:33:07+00:00): Yes, there are trail markers on the side of the trail that give a name to that area or trail segment.
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-30 07:13:14+00:00): Hi Ben Glenroy, welcome to OSM!

I guess something went wrong with your name of the following new map element, correct?

https://osm.org/node/585383637
Rb1kevin (2024-05-29 20:35:28+00:00): There is no walk through on this private property
Rb1kevin (2024-05-29 20:41:09+00:00): People delivering by foot are allowed but no unauthorised public
NeisBot (2024-05-29 20:27:25+00:00): Hi Rollbork, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature's:
https://osm.org/way/1287796122
https://osm.org/way/1287796123
https://osm.org/way/1287796124

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-30 07:37:34+00:00): Based on the satellite imagery I've checked, I don't think your mapped features are beaches based on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dbeach.

What do you think?
StijnRR (2024-05-30 18:49:17+00:00): Hi,

Adding a road ref as the ref of a motorway junction is completely wrong. Please, remove those tags. And where did you get the name tags you added to the motorway junctions from?

Regards,

StijnRR
Ardennen8 (2024-05-30 19:45:54+00:00): Are you speaking about: the N-numbers that refer to the N-routes?

It is not clear enough for me what you exactly talking about.
Ardennen8 (2024-05-30 20:25:02+00:00): I have fixed what i think that you meant.
NeisBot (2024-05-29 20:27:29+00:00): Hi Lordgenome, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature's:
https://osm.org/way/1287796578
https://osm.org/way/1287796577
https://osm.org/way/1287133217
https://osm.org/way/1287133218
https://osm.org/way/1287133219

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
Lordgenome (2024-05-29 20:30:26+00:00): After reading the wiki i believe this would count as a beach.
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-30 07:34:24+00:00): Thanks for your answer.

IMHO your mapped features should be tagged as natural=sand 

What do you think?
Filip009 (2024-07-16 19:06:15+00:00): Ahoj, máš nejaké argumenty, prečo dávať 2 amenity=toilets pre jedny toalety?
carlwalsh (2024-06-07 00:22:54+00:00): Hey Dolphinholmer, I'm impressed with all the stream detail you're adding!

One thing though, this change merged together some paths with access=private with other paths accessible to the public, changing the effective access. 

https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/609799833 
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/607925660

It's not a big deal to split these paths back up, but I just wanted to give you a heads up before I change it back.
Dolphinholmer (2024-06-12 22:33:44+00:00): Hi there, thanks for the heads up, please go ahead, that's an oversight on my part! I find adding the small river tributaries really gives a sense of the overall topography and where the various valleys are.
gscholz (2024-05-31 09:49:29+00:00): Hi swaree,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-0.49390&lat=39.84708&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=152007720

As you may know, this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps.

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
swaree (2024-05-31 10:06:29+00:00): I think it's fixed now, sorry and thanks for the heads-up
gscholz (2024-05-31 10:18:14+00:00): Thanks for your quick response.
Guido
mga_geo (2024-07-04 04:58:35+00:00): Un arrêt ne doit pas figurer dans une relation route_master.
Pouvez-vous corriger ?
mga_geo (2024-08-23 09:48:37+00:00): Toujours pas de réponse, donc je corrige
mga_geo (2024-05-30 19:28:38+00:00): Bonsoir,
La continuité des trajets des voies bus a été cassée suite aux modifications.
Pouvez-vous rétablir ?
Marc
Lyon-St-Clair (2024-05-30 20:42:54+00:00): Bonjour,

Pouvez-vous me préciser quelles lignes sont problématiques ? J'ai MAJ en faisant avec les moyens du bord, certaines lignes étant très curieusement cartographiées (un sens sur deux pour la BreizhGo 10, intitulés peu clairs...)
mga_geo (2024-05-31 04:26:36+00:00): J'ai identifié comme relations problématiques :  r8737122,r4259831,r6927204,r4259848,r4259853,r8737112,r4260059,r8737115,r8704525,r8737120,r8737124,r4260090,r8737121
L'origine du changement peut être dans certains cas un autre contributeur.
mga_geo (2024-06-06 06:06:11+00:00): Par exemple pour r14632216, outre la voie de service qui n'est pas raccordée à la rue de la Libération, les 3 derniers membres sont des stop/platform dont un stop exédentaire.
Discostu36 (2024-05-31 21:09:12+00:00): Please don't upload changes for objects that are thousands of km apart in the same changeset. It makes reviewing changes in OSM much harder.
OJoonas (2024-06-01 20:27:47+00:00): Oh sorry, and thanks for the feedback! Ill do different locations separetly in the future!
Nakaner (2024-05-29 21:55:26+00:00): tracktype habe ich so belassen. Gute Fahrradrouter nutzen es eh nur als Fallback für fehlendes surface=*. Es gibt ungefähr genauso viele Wege in OSM in Deutschland mit surface=grass_papver mit tracktype=grade1 und grade2.
rene78 (2024-05-29 21:59:00+00:00): To clarify: Each of those relations has a Wikidata/Wikipedia entry. Furthermore the outlines were used in the travel guide Wikivoyage.
rene78 (2024-05-29 22:08:57+00:00): If Norte and Centro are not correct anymore they should be corrected instead of deleting all the relations.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Zona.Oeste.da.Cidade.do.Rio.de.Janeiro.jpg
Vinzenz Mai (2024-06-06 17:56:46+00:00): Hi, wäre an der Kreuzung Talstraße/Gerberstraße nicht eher bicycle=dismount statt bicycle=no sinnvoll? Ich habe dort letzted Jahr nicht aufgepasst :-) Siehe https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=49.32122999997196&lng=7.337805000000003&z=17&pKey=109103081233628&focus=photo&x=0.4558454738940686&y=0.6629820031877872&zoom=0
nw520 (2024-06-06 21:12:48+00:00): Hast recht, hab das entsprechend abgeändert. Danke für den Hinweis (und generell das fleißige Beitragen zur Karte)!
map per (2024-05-31 06:11:54+00:00): Hallo Bernardo7,

das ist nicht mehr das Interims Zelt aus Coronazeiten, sondern inzwischen ein neue Leichtbauhalle. Ich hab das Permanentomax deshalb wieder eingezeichent.

Viele Grüße
map per
Bernardo7 (2024-05-31 08:05:13+00:00): okay
spiregrain (2024-05-30 18:24:27+00:00): I've recorded a KartaView trace for the new stretch.  https://kartaview.org/map/@51.54039506392738,-0.009139437504813941,16z
basxto (2024-09-16 06:01:23+00:00): https://naturpark-taunus.de/assets/gfx/karte_npt.png doesn’t support this changeset. Only the eastern half of this area is Naturpark Taunus (formerly Naturpark Hochtaunus)
Xvtn (2024-06-02 21:56:39+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Nice additions here - contributions like this are really valuable for hikers since a lot of external services draw from OSM for paths and stuff.
Generally, the name tag is for the official or "common" name of a feature. That means it might appear on a signpost or map board or something. If not, you might consider using other related tags like `loc_name` (for informal names that a local might use casually) or `destination`. (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:destination)

Let me know if you have any input or questions. I haven't modified any of the stuff you added, just want to get your thoughts. Thanks again for your work here, and welcome to OSM!