piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Gregory Peony (2024-11-01 04:25:22+00:00): Por favor, traduza meus comentários, se necessário. I want to begin by saying that the effort and time you have spent contributing to OSM is appreciated. The following comments are intended to provide you with constructive critisism of your work, so that your further contributions may be more efficient, of a higher quality, and respect the time and effort of other contributors that interact with your contributions. These comments/reviews may come as a shock to you; I recommend that you process them systematically, then upload some small contributions with request for review, to ensure that the quality of your contributions has improved, so that any mistakes you make can be addressed with minimal effort.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133997119
Gregory Peony (2024-11-01 05:04:30+00:00): I'd like to start off with a couple of positives. The vast majority of individual trees are tagged appropriately and most appear to be valid. You seem to have identified buildings in the imagery and some building footprints are valid.--- There are however several errors in this contribution. There are errors in tagging, geometry, and the changeset itself.--- I recommend that you use the buildings plugin when mapping building footprints. This plugin helps with both tagging and geometry of building footprints, because it will automatically tag and square ways that represent buildings. If you are mapping buildings remotely, then they should be tagged as building=yes. Reference: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_features.---Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133997119
wille (2023-03-22 21:31:42+00:00): Olá Samuell

Esse é realmente um bairro, ou apenas um loteamento ou condomínio? A relação tem algumas coisas erradas. O role do limite deveria ser outer e está faltando um admin_centre. Se isso for apenas um condomínio, identifique como Área Residencial.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133997180
Samuell Medeiros (2023-03-22 22:03:20+00:00): Olá, boa tarde.

É um Residencial, o senhor consegue me ajudar a modificar?
wille (2023-03-23 11:34:04+00:00): Oi, Samuell! Fiz algumas correções.

Nessa área você pode ver como deve mapear condomínios ou loteamentos: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/-9.38928/-40.47452

Corrigi a relação do Distrito Industrial, pois é realmente um bairro: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15616830

Sugiro que você verifique cada área que você adicionou e cheque se é bairro ou condomínio e siga o mesmo padrão. Me avise se precisar de alguma instrução adicional.
wille (2023-03-23 11:34:57+00:00): Encontrei uma lista de bairros em
https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petrolina#Bairros
https://www.mbi.com.br/mbi/biblioteca/cidade/petrolina-pe-br/
Talvez ajude a checar o que é bairro e o que não é.
pitfire (2023-03-23 07:15:51+00:00): Hi Pemu,
wenn "maxspeed:forward:conditional 	30 @ (07:00 - 17:00) gilt, was gilt dann von 17:00 - 07:00 ?
NorthCrab_upload (2023-03-22 21:50:46+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1156456522
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1067726143

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
kartler175 (2023-04-08 13:34:44+00:00): That cannot be correct:
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-76.14487&lat=46.39479&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.95&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways
Graptemys (2023-04-24 17:42:37+00:00): I was unable to determine what the correct boundary should be here. It would likely take some pretty deep research, or may not be knowable at all.

Is it worth guessing in order to silence the errors?
NorthCrab_upload (2023-03-22 22:30:34+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, zamień addr:place na addr:city. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/217941761
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/217941769
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/217941771
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/217941793
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/217941803
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/217941805
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/217941809
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/217941825
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/217941840
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/217941850
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/217941852
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/220179115

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
daniel55555 (2023-03-22 22:42:06+00:00): Urząd miasta zmienił wszystkim we wsi adresy po nadaniu ulic. Szczegółowe informacje o adresach można zobaczyć na mapie:
https://zarow.e-mapa.net/
NorthCrab (2023-03-23 00:47:47+00:00): Okej, wystarczy zatem usunąć starą pozostałość addr:place i będzie dobrze :-). W edytorze w przeglądarce po wybraniu obiektu na samym spodzie lewego menu istnieje opcja rozwinięcia tagów i tam znajdziesz opcję usunięcia go. Pozdrawiam i dzięki za aktualizację ulic !
daniel55555 (2023-03-23 23:25:04+00:00): Czy zmiany w #134043172 wystarczą?  Czy trzeba coś jeszcze zrobić? Przepraszam za kłopot, ale pierwszy raz edytuje mapy.
NorthCrab (2023-03-24 11:08:44+00:00): Tak jest, nie ma za co przepraszać. Nie wszystko jest oczywiste na początku ;-)
NorthCrab (2023-03-24 11:14:37+00:00): OpenStreetMap jest bardzo bogate w ilości rzeczy jakie można zmapować i nie zawsze istnieje wsparcie edytora. I z tego powodu nie zauważyliście addr:place w okienku do edycji adresu. Może kiedyś to poprawią :-)
user_5359 (2023-03-23 11:47:50+00:00): Hello! Please have alook on http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1sMV. What is the meaning of the tag Mapa = Arvores?
Gregory Peony (2024-11-01 06:03:20+00:00): You used a custom tag here and do not appear to have answered another contributor's question about its meaning.--- The meaning of this custom tag perhaps could have been added to the chnageset comment, so that its meaning can be understood. You should be documenting custom tags that you employ. I could not find a proposal for this tagging scheme on the OSM wiki. Reference Document your custom tags section in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Good_changeset_comments--- Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133998572
NorthCrab_upload (2023-03-22 22:30:33+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o miejscowości. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, zastosuj kombinację addr:city + addr:street. Jeśli nie, przekaż nazwę miejscowości w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1156464869

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Frans S (2023-03-23 09:28:13+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project. Your mappings are fair but not always squared. Please square each rectangular building with the Q key.
Best regards and keep mapping
NorthCrab_upload (2023-03-22 22:40:22+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10754606428
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10754606429
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10754606430
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10754606431
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10754606432

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
pantufla (2023-10-12 21:01:26+00:00): Hello. Sorry. What is this? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10754619978/history
SINY_King (2023-03-22 22:46:37+00:00): This is phase 1 of the mapping of Alison court (30-25). I will finish the rest of the houses in the future phases.
Tilfældig Mapper (2023-03-23 11:07:20+00:00): Er ret ny til osm og undre mig hvad begrundelsen er, for at fjerne adressen fra disse?
Jørn-osm (2023-03-25 23:02:08+00:00): Alle danske adresser i OSM bliver automatisk opdateret.

En adresse i Danmark er et punkt. Altså ikke flere punkter eller et areal.
mrpulley (2024-12-20 22:21:21+00:00): 24446609 - maxspeed 15 (not 100!)
24446623 - maxspeed correct (although short section at western end near main road becomes 60)
24446624, 24446674, 24446708, 24446828, 566169210 - maxspeed 50 correct
highflyer74 (2023-03-23 07:30:35+00:00): Moin!

Nur kurz die Frage: gibt es hier Zugang- oder zufahrtsbeschränkungen, oder steht hier nur das Schild "Privatweg"? Das wären dann zwei unterschiedliche Sachverhalte, welche oft verwechselt werden.

Viele Grüße aus HB!
limes11 (2023-03-23 07:47:35+00:00): Moin, 

Nur für Anlieger laut Street View, was zur Intention von Anonym passt.

Ob das nun access=destination, access=private heißt...kann man sicher diskutieren, ist es aber im Fall einer Sackgasse nicht wirklich wert.

VG
highflyer74 (2023-03-23 07:50:16+00:00): Exzellent, danke!
user_5359 (2023-03-23 11:21:18+00:00): Bem-vindo ao OSM! Por favor note que esta missão só faz sentido se seguir as regras.

This paper was a GIS coursework, Faculty of Architecture and Spatial Planning, Eduardo Mondlane University, with the aim of contributing to the mapping of the platform

Welcome to OSM! Please note that this assignment only makes sense if you follow the rules
silversurfer83 (2023-03-23 09:58:02+00:00): Moin :)
Für Disc golf hattest du vor einem Jahr schon einen Punkt angelegt.
Ich denke, wenn ich mal einen Moment habe, werde ich da mal eine Fläche raus machen, die alle Bahnen umfasst.
Einen der beiden Punkte nehme ich dann auch wieder aus der Datenbank

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134000136
jmarchon (2023-03-23 05:33:54+00:00): Hello,
In case you didn't know, school zone speed limits can be mapped using conditional restrictions. Take a look at the wiki if you want to know more.

Happy mapping!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134000398
jeslop (2023-03-23 08:57:13+00:00): Hola Meli Salas. Sobre el nombre de este edificio, ¿se refiere el estudio autor de la obra? Si es así, la etiqueta correcta es esta https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:architect

Saludos.

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
treestryder (2023-09-04 03:28:55+00:00): "MTB Jump", is that really the name on all those? Do they have signs listing their names? And are they really tourist attractions?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice

At the moment, there are not community supported tags for tagging mountain bike trail features, only the trail's way can be mapped with current tags.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mountain_biking

In summary, the trail is tourist attraction enough, only things with official name names should be named in OSM, not named just so they get rendered.
clay_c (2023-04-21 14:29:25+00:00): Hi MetalCascade, hate to bother you again, but just a nitpick. Railroad signals and switches should stay separate - rarely is a signal in the exact same physical location as a switch.

As a railroad worker, you're probably aware that signals are typically located a little bit down the line on either side of a group of switches. I found signal assemblies beside the tracks at CP Summit in Trenton, so I added railway=signal next to them, along with the appropriate railway:signal:direction=*. Take a look: https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=18/40.26554/-74.81068
RailandSea (2023-04-21 16:00:09+00:00): I appreciate it, I see now. Trenton was the first line I did with the signals it might have shifted over with the switch node.
Enock4seth (2023-03-23 22:00:10+00:00): Kindly watch what you map or move, see v2 of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10718848095
Qwajo OSM (2023-03-24 10:11:04+00:00): Not clearly getting the issue, can you shine more light?
Enock4seth (2023-03-24 11:23:15+00:00): see https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/10718848095
OSM_RogerWilco (2023-05-24 13:21:53+00:00): Hallo M0r70n,

Zeichen 255 wird wie folgt erfasst:

motorcycle=no
moped=no
mofa=no

Außerdem kann man noch das Verkehrszeichen mit angeben:

traffic_sign=DE:255

Es gibt ein hilfreiches Online-Tool für häufige Verkehrszeichen, das bei der Auswahl der richtigen Tags hilft: http://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/

Viele Grüße
Roger Wilco
MxxCon (2023-03-23 06:48:55+00:00): Hello.
The way you map curbs is incorrect. They are supposed to be positions where the curb actually is.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134001243
user_5359 (2023-03-23 21:20:40+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please the the wiki.osm.org for a better description. You use mostly wrong or misspelled keys.
MxxCon (2023-03-23 06:53:10+00:00): Hello.
Whenever you are mapping crosswalks they must connect with a node with the intersecting road.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134001505
MxxCon (2023-03-23 06:53:51+00:00): Hello.
What is the meaning of your changeset comment and why did you name this business MOCHA?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134001588
MxxCon (2023-03-23 06:58:38+00:00): Hello.
Please split your edits into smaller geographic areas, such as neighborhood or a city or at most a county.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134001607
MxxCon (2023-03-23 07:00:47+00:00): Hello.
Please elaborate your edit.
There's no junction in the middle of a way where you added it.
The meaning of junction is literally that, the road splits from this point.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134001763
bumpyroad (2023-03-25 02:43:04+00:00): Fantastic!!! Thanks BubbaJuice :D The building outlines here are much better than the dataset maintained by the County.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-03-25 02:13:16+00:00): Reverted by DWG for vandalism and as apparent sock-puppet:  changeset/134090194
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-26 13:43:01+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10754868509/history has width = 0 that was added in this edit
how something exist and have width=0?
warkaree (2023-03-23 02:26:24+00:00): Hello

Could you please limit your changesets to smaller areas? So that it becomes easier to review them.

Thanks.
cartofy (2023-03-23 11:40:10+00:00): What does fixing_osm_roads	maskedmsf mean? 
Is this part of an organised editing activity? 
What is the purpose of adding Motor_Vehicle=yes? It's generally a redundant tag and is considered defacto true unless stated otherwise.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:motor_vehicle%3Dyes
Kovoschiz (2023-03-23 08:43:15+00:00): `name=` is for the most common name in existing public use.
Please discuss with the local community first before these changes. Use OpenHistoricalMap to show the full history.
Kovoschiz (2023-03-23 09:07:16+00:00): Please don't add random transliterations. This is unneeded, and doesn't reflect common usage.
Kovoschiz (2023-03-23 08:43:53+00:00): `name=` is for the most common name in existing public use.
Please discuss with the local community first before these changes. Use OpenHistoricalMap to show the full history.
Kovoschiz (2023-03-23 08:44:08+00:00): `name=` is for the most common name in existing public use.
Please discuss with the local community first before these changes. Use OpenHistoricalMap to show the full history.
Kovoschiz (2023-03-23 08:44:33+00:00): `name=` is for the most common name in existing public use.
Please discuss with the local community first before these changes. Use OpenHistoricalMap to show the full history.
Kovoschiz (2023-03-23 08:44:58+00:00): Please do not remove other names.
Kovoschiz (2023-03-23 08:51:03+00:00): Please don't attach unrelated features to roads. This makes editing difficult, and does not represent reality.
mrpulley (2025-01-01 10:05:57+00:00): 32476934 maxspeed correct (50)
32476935, 32476940, 32476936 likely to have same maxspeed
528382808 is missing a maxspeed sign, but is likely to be maxspeed 50.
611434606 is very unlikely to be maxspeed 100 (coming off a 50 zone, and being next to the hospital) - I've changed this to maxspeed=50 at changeset 160856283
mrpulley (2025-01-25 21:32:36+00:00): This road was signposted as maxspeed 20 at my survey in 2012, and still signposted as maxspeed 20 at repeat survey in Dec 2024. NSW Speed Data has incorrect information here.
mrpulley (2024-06-14 13:24:51+00:00): No maxspeed signs at survey May 2024, but these maxspeeds sound plausible
mrpulley (2024-06-14 13:33:54+00:00): Maxspeed correct for Old Soldiers Road (132586843, 1105414562)
No maxspeed sign seen at survey May 2024 on Sundew Avenue (607414579, 607414582, 607414583)
Other roads not checked
mrpulley (2025-02-08 06:23:02+00:00): These unsealed National Park roads were previously surveyed by me in 2015 - maxspeeds 40 and 20 (not 100). NSW Speed Data does have maxspeed=100, but type 'default' (which likely means that the actual maxspeed hasn't been entered in their system). Reverted at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162268871
mrpulley (2026-02-28 08:34:48+00:00): Resurveyed Nov 2025 - definitely still maxspeed 40 for 95705823, 387687426, 96095197. Other roads previously maxspeed 20 has since been reduced to maxspeed 10. Updated at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178261553
Kovoschiz (2023-03-23 08:45:15+00:00): `name=` is for the most common name in existing public use.
Please discuss with the local community first before these changes. Use OpenHistoricalMap to show the full history.
Kovoschiz (2023-03-23 08:45:30+00:00): `name=` is for the most common name in existing public use.
Please discuss with the local community first before these changes. Use OpenHistoricalMap to show the full history.
user_5359 (2023-03-24 12:14:43+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1156501832. What is the meaning of the tags 
    batiment = maison
    batment = maison
? What is the difference between the booth keys? Did you mean building=yes?
emersonveenstra (2023-03-23 11:22:25+00:00): I think you meant to say "turn:lanes" instead of "lanes:turn" here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1156505847
treestryder (2023-03-24 00:43:04+00:00): Fixed. Thank you.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/134044562

Say, I can't recall if you have attended a meetup or not. Michigan mappers have been meeting up monthly for a few years now. The meeting information can be found on the Michigan Wiki.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Michigan#Community
emersonveenstra (2023-03-24 11:04:29+00:00): I haven't, wednesday nights aren't good nights for me right now, but I should be able to join a couple in the summer
phoenixsaigon1698 (2023-04-26 08:01:16+00:00): please add "from" member.
mavl (2023-04-25 09:05:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
jmapb (2023-03-28 22:11:18+00:00): Skateboard thingie next to the restroom building is no longer here? I could swear I saw it a few days ago.
MxxCon (2023-03-29 00:44:10+00:00): It was mapped as both, node and area. I deleted node.
MxxCon (2023-03-29 00:49:26+00:00): Oh, i see what you are talking about.
I changed it from leisure=pitch+sport=skateboard to flagpole because based on shadows from satellite imagery it looked like a flagpole with 3 flags
jmapb (2023-03-29 01:42:50+00:00): I too was skeptical last year when I saw this changeset, from a brand new account... but I surveyed and there is indeed a skate apparatus there. It was drawn as a crude polygon, which I changed to a node pending updated aerial imagery.

I'm not a skater myself so I trusted the tags of the original mapper, Jane V Moses, who added "description=mini pumptrack" (which is actually still tagged on the flagpole) so I guess that's what it is. You can see it in the article about labyrinths that akadouri posted to #local-nyc -- https://gothamist.com/news/new-york-city-is-filled-with-labyrinths-if-you-know-where-to-look

Anyway I'm putting this back, and I'll add the flagpole as its own node.
MxxCon (2023-03-29 01:49:53+00:00): ah, it's the same thing as https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13622078
bumpyroad (2023-03-23 05:03:05+00:00): Thanks for catching that, I should have read the wiki first!
Devdatta (2023-03-23 06:39:36+00:00): Hi! Please limit your changesets to smaller areas:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
Uterouter (2023-03-23 07:15:37+00:00): По пешим дорожкам не работает маршрутизация для авто. Поэтому нет смысла давать им ограничения motor_vehicle=private.
cs09736 (2023-05-06 11:19:49+00:00): Should bike lane continue on Murrumbeena road on the left side just after Dalny Road? Bing imagery and Mapillary show the bike lane continues through the intersection since it's marked by the broken line.
Quite Frankly (2023-05-07 23:50:23+00:00): It does continue from the intersection going south; there's a 100m break where the bike lane gives way to a turning lane before the intersection, so I've just mapped that break
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-01 14:01:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 174063813, 174063778, 174063039, 174063675, 174063839, 174063864, 174063733, 174063852, 174063722, 174063049, 174063081, 174063378, 174063746, 174063119, 174063802, 174063878 where the changeset comment is: Following a DWG complaint, reverting a dubious import.  See e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1311170850 https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18848