piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2026-01-22 20:46:13+00:00): hi,

Regarding your question.
Regional Government calls it without space: example https://www.madeira.gov.pt/drc/pesquisar/ctl/ReadInformcao/mid/7602/InformacaoId/14345/UnidadeOrganicaId/22/LiveSearch/VE2

VR1 is a road under concession and the company call's it VR1 https://www.vialitoral.com/
Yes i will update all regional roads with that ref. if you wish, can add alternative ref tag with space inbetween "ER NUMBER".

This update of name, is mostly due to the name being wrongly used instead of tunnel_name or bridge_name.
HurricaneGator (2026-01-22 22:34:40+00:00): Hello NunoCaldeira. Thank you for letting me know. Happy mapping!
VLD0251 (2026-01-18 22:27:52+00:00): Hi, thanks for your contributions! to avoid duplicate labels on the map (double rendering), the best practice is not to use the name=* tag on the landuse=residential area when a place=* node with the same name already exists inside it.
See: OSM Wiki - https://wiki. openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dresidential. 
Happy mapping!
Mathias_ADAV (2026-05-19 15:55:40+00:00): Salut ! Je viens de faire quelques modifs dans le secteur, j'ai pas compris ce node ;)
Sébastien Pi (2026-05-19 22:26:36+00:00): Je dirais un toboggan vu le nom. Pas le temps de regarder ce soir dans le wiki, mais je jetterai un œil demain.
En tous cas, une contribution Osmand, ça veut dire que j'étais sur place. Tu n'as rien vu de ce style ?
Niiepce (2026-04-16 13:21:24+00:00): Hallo Markus Schmitt,

Danke für das Mapping der Bäume. Das Tagging sieht sehr gut und detailreich aus. Nur ein paar kleine Hinweise:
name=* sollte nicht für Beschreibungen wie "Apfel" verwendet werden(siehe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Verwende_nicht_das_Name-Tag,_um_Dinge_zu_beschreiben).
website=* sollte nur für Websites verwendet werden, die konkret dem Objekt zugeordnet sind, nicht für allgemeine Websites über z.B. die Sorte des Baums.

Bei den einzelnen Bäumen bei denen das falsch war habe ich das und andere Kleinigkeiten (wikidata=* -> taxon:wikidata=* , note=Schild vorhanden -> signed=yes , etc.) verbessert.

Viele Grüße
Niiepce
NeisBot (2026-01-19 07:26:20+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/9645279565 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Bicycle repair shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
paedc1 (2026-01-19 10:18:28+00:00): Fixed by replacing description with service tags
OSM-Contributer (2026-01-18 12:32:57+00:00): I think it's under construction if it is then mark it as being constructed
Supaplex (2026-01-19 04:58:03+00:00): 也可以將廟範圍加 landuse=religious，然後主殿建築加 amenity=place_of_worship
供參考
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177371696
LKAsahi (2026-01-19 08:07:03+00:00): 感謝S大，已經更正！
kadiwa (2026-01-22 16:10:31+00:00): Hast dich bei "through" vertippt.
joost schouppe (2026-01-19 15:32:20+00:00): Hier ook de opmerking ivm dubbel mappen van zonnepanelen
tux67 (2026-01-18 15:07:05+00:00): Hallo MichaelE1410,
willkommen bei Openstreetmap und danke, dass du mithelfen möchtest, die Kartendaten zu verbessern.


Prima, dass du deine Änderungssätze mit aussagekräftigen Kommentaren versiehst.
Gib aber bitte auch die Quelle deiner Informationen an:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
Eine gute allgemeine Einführung zu OSM gibts z.B. hier:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Solltest du Fragen haben oder Hilfe benötigen, dann kannst du dich gerne bei mir oder im Forum melden:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/de/56

Für eine Qualitätssicherung, an der sich alle Mapper in der Gegend beteiligen können - bitte antworte - wenn notwendig - immer hier im Änderungssatz mit der Kommentarfunktion.

Viel Spaß beim Mappen wünscht
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177372274
MichaelE1410 (2026-01-18 16:23:38+00:00): Hi, meine Quellen sind:
Änderungen zur Meurerstraße: Ich wohne dort.
Änderungen zu Feuerwehr: Einheitliche Benamung der realität entsprechend mit Angabe der Löscheinheit und anpassung von Gebäudegrenzen der Karte selbst entsprechend.
tux67 (2026-01-19 08:45:27+00:00): Danke ...
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177372274
joost schouppe (2026-01-19 12:36:36+00:00): Dag Vossie,
De operator en operator:wikidata zorgt ervoor dat het eenvoudig mogelijk is te weten wie dit station beheert. Zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Belgium/Firestations voor wat meer context.
Ik herstel deze tags terug. Waarom had je ze eigenlijk gewijzigd?
vossie006 (2026-01-19 12:42:17+00:00): Hulpverleningszone Fluvia werd sinds september 2025 Brandweer Fluvia

https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brandweer_Fluvia
joost schouppe (2026-01-19 12:50:23+00:00): OK, dan corrigeer ik de naam bij de operator!
De operator:wikidata blijft hetzelfde, dus dat nummer mocht sowieso ongewijzigd blijven. Maar ik heb via https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q16684031 wel de naam verbeterd.
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2026-01-18 17:06:09+00:00): Merhaba. highway=proposed etiketini eklediğiniz yollara motorway=yes yerine proposed=motorway etiketi eklemeniz daha iyi olurdu gibi duruyor. Etiketin kullanımı için bkz: highway=proposed

motorway=* etiketinin anlamı için bkz: motorway=*

İyi günler.
joost schouppe (2026-01-19 15:17:05+00:00): Hoi Vossie,
Bedankt voor je aanvullingen, maar we hebben wel wat verbeteringen moeten doen:
- Je hebt hier het bestaande brandweerstation opnieuw getekend, met een iets grotere vorm en een verbeterde naam. Een van de belangrijkste regels is: één ding in het echt, één ding op de kaart (zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element). We hebben jouw versie verwijderd, maar wel jouw naam behouden en de vorm ervan aangepast zoals jij die had gemaakt.
- je had het gebouw opnieuw een adres gegeven, maar dat is niet nodig: het firestation als "voorziening" (bij de tags herkenbaar als "amenity") had reeds een adres
- het zonnepaneel als vlak op het dak was OK, maar je hebt het dan ook nog eens als punt toegevoegd op een van de hoeken.  De editor toont dat vlak niet zo duidelijk, maar dat maakt het niet minder juist
- je had de fietsenstalling een naam gegeven, maar niet de juiste tag. Bij de zoekefunctie bij het tekenen van objecten kan je verschillende soort fietsenstallingen terugvinden. Sowieso: gebruik nooit de naam om gewoon een omschrijving toe te voegen (zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only).
- hetzelfde voor het gebouwtje met de vuilbakken. Daar vonden we zo direct geen tag voor, dus daar hebben we gewoon je name als "description" behouden
- Om het eenvoudiger te maken voor andere mensen om je veranderingen te begrijpen, is het handig als je alle veranderingen op één site in één keer opslaat, en niet bij elke afzonderlijke verandering op Opslaan duwt.
Anonymous36863 (2026-01-19 09:29:14+00:00): leisure=playground и natural=sand са нужни за да се вижда с и CoMaps, и osm.org
Anonymous36863 (2026-01-19 09:30:16+00:00): Без natural=sand няма да пише, че има пясък.
Dimitar155 (2026-01-19 09:39:41+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
Anonymous36863 (2026-01-20 14:48:11+00:00): Благодаря Ви, че изтрихте ненужни тагове, които могат да създадат проблеми. Заместих тага natural=sand с surface=sand , но не съм съгласен с премахването на fee=no , level=0 и особено, leisure=playground . Отговорите мoгaт да са прости, но няма друга причина да се премахнат. Смятам, че нещо е по-добре от нищо.
Fraxi (2026-01-20 14:56:12+00:00): Не съм @Dimitar155, но бих отговорил: За пясъчника може да се използва https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:playground%3Dsandpit .  Ако толкова държите... Относно другите тагове - аз не си спомням да съм виждал досега табела/надпис за детска площадка, изискваща такса. По-скоро за ограничен достъп. А level=0 за детска площадка, особено из София, няма логика... Ако греша, да бъда поправен.
Dimitar155 (2026-01-20 15:25:01+00:00): Всеки обект в OSM по подразбиране се намира на level=0, освен ако изрично не е посочено друго. Затова добавянето на този таг не носи допълнителна информация. По същия начин не добавяме motor_vehicle=yes към всички улици - това се подразбира от типа highway.

Същото важи и за fee=no. В повечето случаи достъпът до детски площадки е безплатен, така че липсата на fee=* вече означава "няма такса". Тагът има смисъл основно когато има изключение - т.е. fee=yes.

Съгласен съм с тезата "нещо е по-добре от нищо", но в OSM все пак има граници. Когато един обект натрупа прекалено много тагове (например детска площадка с над 30 тагa или магазин с над 30 тагa), започва да става трудно да се разбере кое е същественото за него и каква е основната информация, която искаме да предадем. В такъв момент картата става по-скоро шумна, отколкото по-полезна.

Отбелязването на елементи като съоръженията на детската площадка, наличието на ограда, пейки или кошчета според мен носи значително по-голяма стойност за потребителя на картата. За разлика от това, информация като наличието на информационна табела трудно може да се приеме като нещо, което реално помага на повечето хора, използващи картата.

Подобна логика важи и за таговете, свързани с диети (halal, безглутенова, кето и др.). Те имат смисъл, когато обектът е специализиран или изрично рекламира, че предлага такива продукти. При масови супермаркети или ресторанти добавянето им по подразбиране по-скоро създава объркване, отколкото полезна информация.

Всичко това го казвам с най-добри намерения. Целта не е да се премахва информация без причина, а да се насочим към тагване на неща, които са реално полезни, проверими на място и помагат картата да остане ясна и разбираема за всички.
eggie (2026-01-18 13:49:15+00:00): Hi..
Please use the present addressnode..
No space in the postcode.
Gr eggie
Fraxi (2026-01-18 14:39:54+00:00): Мите, имам въпрос. Може да е била водена такава дискусия преди време, за която не знам. Защо, наистина, да няма маркери за микрорайоните? Или поне така се водеха едно време...
Fraxi (2026-01-18 14:40:57+00:00): Игнорирай въпроса  - след като писах видях https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177373182
Littlebtc (2026-01-18 13:56:48+00:00): part 44
TrickyFoxy (2026-01-22 16:26:35+00:00): 👋 В правом меню редактора есть кнопка «Настройки фонового изображения». Выберите там спутниковые снимки ESRI — они свежее
TrickyFoxy (2026-01-22 16:26:36+00:00): 👋 В правом меню редактора есть кнопка «Настройки фонового изображения». Выберите там спутниковые снимки ESRI — они свежее
Warin61 (2026-01-19 01:42:20+00:00): HI,
The 'Course Grass Nusery' has no main tag so it will not be rendered. 
The appropriate tag is {{tag|landuse|plant_nursery}} with {{tag|plant|grass}}. The name tag is for names only .. and it this case the description alone is enough. 
I have made the appropriate changes .. hopefully it renders?
eggie (2026-01-18 19:52:32+00:00): Hoi,

Denk dat alles nog op construction zetten inderdaad beter is.
Woningen kun je op verzoek laten importeren zodra de bouw begonnen is.
Dat kan via het draadje BAG importverzoeken.
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/nl/43

Mapse
eggie
Supaplex (2026-01-19 04:26:59+00:00): 圓環不見了？
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177375270
jptolosa (2026-01-18 20:52:06+00:00): Hola, no existe motivo para convertir el polígono a una relación si sólo va a consistir de un miembro. Cuando se da el caso de un sólo miembro se debe recurrir al polígono para poner la información.
Saludos.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177376734
Tresunocuatrodos (2026-01-19 12:58:15+00:00): Hola, no sé. Soy nuevo, vengo de wikipedia y para subir mapas y que tengan la delimitación en wikidata, sólo es posible con un mapa "relation", y no "way" que es el que ya había hecho por tí u otra persona. Entonces eso hice, la verdad ni siquiera sé convertirlo a polígono, y menos si éste podría servir para representar el territorio en wikidata :/. Te agradeceríamos sobremanera si me pudieras poner al tanto sobre eso, muchas gracias de antemano!. Saludos.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177376734
Tresunocuatrodos (2026-01-19 12:59:30+00:00): Hola, no sé. Soy nuevo, vengo de wikipedia y para subir mapas y que tengan la delimitación en wikidata, sólo es posible con un mapa "relation", y no "way" que es el que ya había hecho por tí u otra persona. Entonces eso hice, la verdad ni siquiera sé convertirlo a polígono, y menos si éste podría servir para representar el territorio en wikidata :/. Te agradeceríamos sobremanera si me pudieras poner al tanto sobre eso, muchas gracias de antemano!. Saludos.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177376734
dankarran (2026-01-18 16:18:09+00:00): Thanks for checking on that and tweaking it
AdrienHegy (2026-02-02 22:26:21+00:00): Bonjour Kalepom,
Je suis surpris du nom ajouté au bâtiment https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/65271638.
Je pense d’abord qu’il y a une typo, ce devrait plutôt être la butte enchantée.
Ensuite je m’interroge sur l’origine du nom. Je n’ai trouvé ce nom que sur des annonces de location de meublé de tourisme.
Je n’ai pas souvenir d’avoir vu ce nom sur place et de mémoire, le nom indiqué sur l’immeuble est « Résidence la Becque » (pas lisible sur la photo https://explore.panoramax.fr/?s=fp;s2;p6056e1d7-0b24-464a-8bce-e082f08dad37;c303.01/-1.56/53;m17.1/47.208309/-1.506949 malheureusement).
Je trouve également la copopriété BECQUE ET BUTTE ENCHANTEE https://www.registre-coproprietes.gouv.fr/annuaire/detail/65665.
Quelle source as-tu utilisé pour le nom ?
Kalepom (2026-02-02 23:01:16+00:00): Salut,
Oui, c'est une affreuse coquille. J'ai corrigé. C'est bien butte.
La source c'est que j'était devant, et il y a une plaque qui l'indique ^^ 
C'est une contribution StreetComplete. Il était tard et il faisait froid, mes petits doigts engourdis ont mal tapé ce nom xD
AdrienHegy (2026-02-03 11:13:53+00:00): Après discussion avec une connaissance locale (la lecture des inscriptions sur Panoramax étant vraiment trop difficile), je comprend mieux mon incompréhension.
Je ne connaissais le bâtiment que depuis l’avenue Armand Duez, le bâtiment y porte bien le nom Résidence la Becque.
Et sur la rue Jean-Baptiste Robert, c’est la Butte Enchantée.
J’ai fait un découpage en building:part pour mieux retranscrire tout ça (et les building:levels et roof:shape).
Malheureusement, ça fait disparaître le nom du rendu standard…
NeisBot (2026-01-19 07:26:28+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13464155666 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Bookstore"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-28 10:23:46+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177798751
(Deleted all added tags)
pitscheplatsch (2026-01-18 14:57:56+00:00): Hi Nakaner,

ich denke hier hat etwas nicht ganz funktioniert. Die spammy Description ist noch da ...

Best,
Pascal
pitscheplatsch (2026-01-18 14:59:02+00:00): Wolltest du vlt. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177253794 reverten?
Nakaner-repair (2026-01-18 15:06:02+00:00): Danke, ich hatte übersehen, dass der User sein Objekt viermal hochgeladen hat.
diodaix (2026-01-19 09:31:48+00:00): Hallo kak mufyd, saya penasaran ingin bertanya, apakah sejak diskusi terakhir tentang tag toponimi kel/desa, kelurahan sudah disepakati untuk menggunakan tag place=suburb? Karena kemarin saya pikir penyamaan untuk desa dan kelurahan menggunakan place=village (kecuali Jakarta) sudah berlaku..
FenyMufyd (2026-01-24 13:22:42+00:00): Halo, sebenarnya belum ada kesepakatan tapi saya mentag seperti ini untuk pembeda antara desa dan kelurahan. Mungkin masih perlu dibahas lebih lanjut bagusnya seperti apa..
Nakaner-repair (2026-01-18 15:05:20+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 177252939, 177253794, 177254068, 177352320, 177377131.
limes11 (2026-01-18 15:10:32+00:00): Hallo und Willkommen zu osm,

ich habe das mal korrigiert, access=private reicht hier, die weiteren Tags sind nicht notwendig. 

Viele Grüße
NathanBnm (2026-03-16 08:39:16+00:00): Bonjour, cette station de recharge n'est pas prévue pour permettre la recharge de vélos électriques. Je me permet d'annuler votre contribution?
halibutwig (2026-03-16 16:10:28+00:00): Bonjour,

La borne dispose d'une prise électrique du même type que celles qu'on trouve dans les logements. On peut donc y charger un vélo électrique, même si ce n'est pas prévu pour, non ?
Luke_Vader (2026-01-18 16:56:40+00:00): Why did you remove surface=paved and hgv=yes?
Additionally, you mention KeepRight in your changesets, that is no longer updated and should not be a source of information. according to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_Right
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177378592
Luke_Vader (2026-01-18 17:02:53+00:00): Also, why are you removing german names from streets in all your changesets?
EUMapper (2026-01-19 08:01:55+00:00): First of all Hello!
I didn't know about KeepRight, I will delete this in my future changesets.

German street names don't exist on the street signs, french streets names an sometimes lux. street names exist. Or should we also map french street names in Germany? Thanks for a reply!
EUMapper (2026-01-19 08:06:23+00:00): Hello!
Hgv=yes: You don't need it for the routing on a street if it is not only restricted to Hgv. 

Thanks
Luke_Vader (2026-01-19 12:18:40+00:00): hey,
So on the hgv=yes : I agree, and i see your point. But i do not see the value in removing the tag where it's correct.
There is nothing wrong with removing these tags, I just question if this effort is better spent elsewhere. Especially since you are turning explicit data into implicit data

As for the name. I do not agree that there being no explicitly marked German name on the signs means that the German name isn't correct and officially recognised by the government.

E.G. for a long time, train stations such as esch-sur-alzette had only the french name marked. That does not mean that the Luxembourgish name wasn't correct, it was even vocally announced as 'Esch-Uelzecht' in the train.
Later, the Luxembourgish names were added to the signs too
https://www.chronicle.lu/category/rail/54039-luxembourgish-names-added-to-train-station-platform-signs

Whether the German names you are removing are correct or not is not clear to me.
Especially since the German and Luxembourgish names would be so close to each-other, that increasing the size of expensive road signs just to add both would be a giant waste of money.

I do not know how this could be verified. geoportail only shows the primary name of the road.
Kugelbaum (2026-01-20 20:18:24+00:00): Road names are defined by the respective communes. Usually only in one language. Which is often French but especially in the Éislek, more and more often Luxembourgish. Especially when road names didn't exist before roughly 2009 (Maison n).

As you said, you can sometimes find besides French names a Luxembourgish version on the signs on the ground. Afaik nothing registered at the cadaster and they can have a total different message/meaning.

Problem with German unofficial translations is that they are often literal and worse, have a connotation to a certain dark period when everything got Germanized. See [industrie.lu](https://industrie.lu/ruesChangements.html) for some examples.
EUMapper (2026-01-22 07:52:56+00:00): Hello,
German unofficial translations is that they are often literal and worse, have a connotation to a certain dark period when everything got Germanized. 

Very important and I totally agree!! I'll not accept a german translation on a road if not written on the street sign.
Luke_Vader (2026-01-22 08:38:06+00:00): This is fair, Thank you @Kugelbaum for the history.
My concern still slightly remains of road signs not necessarily reflecting official names, but German names are unlikely to ever be seen as an official name considering the historical context.
In addition, it could be argued that official intent is less important then what is represented on the ground.
OSM_RogerWilco (2026-02-18 10:41:12+00:00): Hier hast Du eine Heidefläche gelöscht... :-(
OSM_RogerWilco (2026-02-18 10:41:24+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/168782732
Ropino (2026-02-18 11:41:04+00:00): Wurde wieder hergestellt.
Ancaba (2026-01-18 15:34:07+00:00): Sorry, misstaken. 

This is a Busstop for urban buses, not one for longdistance buses.
Norbert Dichter (2026-01-19 10:54:19+00:00): Hello, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. Thank you for your contribution. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. Or just hit the Q-key.
Also please keep in mind: many buildings are very close but do not actually touch each other, try to map them close to each other without letting them connect or share nodes with each other, roads, or residential area outlines. In the iD web editor, holding down the "alt" key will keep nodes from "snapping" to each other and accidentally connecting.  Thanks so much for your contribution, Norbert 'Nodi' Dichter, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177379401
Supaplex (2026-01-19 04:20:50+00:00): Do you know the name of the pharmacy?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177379704
TM6926 (2026-02-02 15:46:10+00:00): Pourquoi ces modifications ne sont toujours pas prises en compte dans les outils qui utilisent OSM ? (OsmAnd, OpenRunner,...)
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-06-04 11:17:04+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1326462969/history - to nadal jest planowane po tym jak metro obiecali?
Anas masuris (2026-06-04 17:10:10+00:00): Nie jest to do mnie pytanie - nie śledzę aż tak sytuacji rozwoju szybkiego tramwaju lub metra w Krakowie (w edycji pewnie tylko oddzielałem tor od pozostałych na ST Kraków Olsza, zatem nie było w mojej gestii zmienianie statusu tejże proponowanej trasy)
Andrew Chadwick (2026-01-18 16:38:38+00:00): OK, but why change Rotherham, GB from a place=town to an amenity=food_court? I've reverted that bit, anyway, just curious how it happened.
not_jaws (2026-01-19 08:31:39+00:00): Good question, I'm not sure. I didn't edit Rotherham on purpose, though I did briefly look at the tags in ID so maybe I clicked somewhere.

Thanks for catching that.