piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Olaf der Mapper (2023-11-28 22:39:47+00:00): Strecki, hör hier sofort auf, weiter Rumzustänkern! Du selbst hast hier (wie du geschrieben hast) nicht einmal den Inhalt des Changesets begutachtet, bist aber dennoch dolle am Austeilen hier.

Ich bin mit meiner 0-Minuten-Sperre und der fadenscheinigen Begründung dieser nicht einverstanden und halte diese für nicht gerechtfertigt. 
Wir werden trotzdem noch viel Spaß hier gemeinsam haben, möglicherweise nur nicht mehr unter diesem Account - Ein Olaf lässt sich nicht kleinkriegen!

LG Olaf
streckenkundler (2023-11-29 14:28:36+00:00): Ich kann dir da nicht helfen, das kannst nur du alleine. Aber OSM ist keine Spaßveranstaltung.

Gut gemeinter Rat: lass es bleiben!

Eventuelle Reinkarnationen von dir werden von OSM-Mappern schnell erkannt...
woodpeck (2023-11-30 10:10:25+00:00): Eine Sperre mit Sockenpuppen zu umgehen und/oder in Täuschungsabsicht Accounts anzulegen, die auf den ersten Blick wie jemand anders aussehen, ist auf jeden Fall der falsche Weg für jemanden, der sich wünscht, dass seine Beiträge in Zukunft von der Community ernstgenommen werden. Wer sowas macht, der hat in OSM weder Freude noch Freunde und kann eigentlich genausogut gleich gehen.
Olaf der Mapper (2023-11-30 20:48:59+00:00): Sockenpuppe ist ein gutes Stichwort: Der verdächtige Account „hk51“ editiert mir schon eine Weile hinterher, haut ohne jede Diskussion Änderungen wie Straßennamen wieder raus (zb CS 144361966) und könnte mal auf diesen Verdacht hin untersucht werden – Aber darum geht es hier gerade nicht.

Mich stört viel mehr der allgemeine Umgang gerade hier und auch im Forum, als man einen (übrigens sehr wertvollen) Beitrag von mir wegen der Formulierung „Nichtskönner“ gemeldet, geflaggt und gecancelt hat. Wie mir später ein DE-Moderator in einer privaten DM mitteilte, hätte das übrigens so niemals passieren dürfen. Zumal auf meinen Beitrag hin das brandenburgische Landesamt für Umwelt seine Homepage aktualisiert hat.

Meine Vermutung ist: Derjenige der diesen Kommentar gemeldet hat, hat hier schon kommentiert und nutzte dies als kleine Retourkutsche, da er schon mehrmals im Forum argumentativ von mir zerlegt wurde.

Als Folge hat man sowohl hier als auch im Forum eine Sperre in Kraft gesetzt, deren Begründung teils fadenscheinig bis absolut unterirdisch erscheint. Die Botschaft, die bleibt, ist: Diskussion ist mit uns nicht erwünscht.

Ich werde trotzdem nicht so schnell aufgeben und weiterhin für eine vollständige und aktuelle Openstreetmap-Karte kämpfen. Die OSM ist ein Community-Projekt und die Community seid eben nicht ihr alleine.

gesperrte Grüße,
euer Olaf
mueschel (2023-12-01 19:00:34+00:00): Hi,
could you check the recycling tags you added here? All the tags  should be in English, and only those listed in the Wiki should be used:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Drecycling#Accepted_types_of_waste
flohoff (2023-11-27 22:09:34+00:00): Moin,
ich hab gerade den changeset per zufall gesehen.

Nur für das nächste mal - Bei vielen dingen macht es sinn die lifecycle tags zu benutzen - also sowas wie razed: demolished: etc ... Denn auf dem Luftbild wird die Noch sichtbar sein, und bei Mapillary auch, und irgendein mapper trägt solche features wieder ein. 

Deshalb - lieber die lifecycle tags nehmen - und vielleicht noch eienn note da drauf - und jeder der meint er muss es eintragen kann das finden. 

Kann man dann nach 1-2 jahren löschen wenn es aus den üblichen Luftbildern und Mapillary verschwunden ist.

Flo
silversurfer83 (2023-11-28 09:36:42+00:00): Hier ein Link ins Wiki, wo das Prinzip erklärt wird, was Flo erwähnt hat:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix

Grüße und bei Fragen immer raus damit :)

silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144525461
scai (2024-08-13 07:28:02+00:00): Hi Galdo99,

bezüglich https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11380398005:

highway=rest_area ist eher für Rastplätze an Autobahnen gedacht. Ich ändere es mal zu tourism=picnic_site, das passt besser.

Grüße
Alex
bxl-forever (2023-11-27 22:35:36+00:00): Thanks for this.

I saw you requested a review.
We made some minor changes.  In particular, the syntax for phone numbers had a serious flaw.  Make sure to type +32 and not + 32 (no space after the plus sign).

Also, do not reuse address nodes, there are meant to store addresses and nothing else; if you want to add a shop or an amenity, simply create a new point next to them.

Happy mapping.
bxl-forever (2023-11-27 23:04:48+00:00): … But most importantly, thanks for having added useful information to the map. 👍️
aTarom (2023-11-28 07:56:24+00:00): Hola LimitEsp, se han eliminado tags que parecen correctos, por ejemplo en
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/437441248/history
es accidental?
Saludos
Frans S (2023-12-28 10:44:11+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Buildings need to be mapped as building=yes.
No building part, no levels.
You regularly map buildings over an existing mapped building. Please don't.
Please square each building. ( don't you have the building plugin installed. This plugin draws fine rectangular buildings.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144526909
MxxCon (2023-11-28 04:48:01+00:00): Hello.
Are they speed bump https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Atraffic_calming%3Dbump or a larger speed hump https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Atraffic_calming%3Dhump?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144527275
Mavrick (2023-11-28 14:32:43+00:00): Hello,
You're right, its a Hump rather then bump.  I made the change.
Thank you
Kovoschiz (2023-11-28 07:24:01+00:00): You broke several tree areas here. Please don't touch them if you are not interested in editing them.
Chris Denomy (2023-11-29 10:52:37+00:00): I did indeed remove a number of tree areas.  I did so because of how randomly they were applied i.e. in some cases areas were used to encompass SINGLE trees.  Is this a best practice?
Kovoschiz (2023-11-29 11:24:25+00:00):  How did you tell whether some of them are single? Regardless of that, and whether it is is preferred, you didn't replace them with `natural=tree` , and is thus removing data. 
You broke a large `=multipolygon` here, and also  deleted a `=bare_rock` later .
HubMiner (2023-11-28 07:15:38+00:00): Looks good!  Possibly add driveways, in case anyone would need to navigate in that area.
Wulfmorn (2023-11-28 09:51:45+00:00): Are you mapping the landcover for the whole of Iceland? :D (I'm impressed)
Tómas Ingi (2023-11-30 08:13:15+00:00): Hi,

That's the hope! We'll see if it works out :)

Thankfully there have been others who have contributed significantly to the landcover (see Ben97 for example), and it's always motivating to see the progress when the map updates!
Wulfmorn (2023-11-30 11:58:27+00:00): I agree. Visual result matters for motivation. Let's hope you dont have to re-map too much after the recent (latest) volcanic activity. Keep up the awesome work.
literan (2023-11-28 18:20:02+00:00): приветствую. в руосм есть соглашение об именовании памятников https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:historic=memorial#%D0%9A%D0%B0%D0%BA_%D0%BE%D1%82%D0%BC%D0%B5%D1%87%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%8C_%D0%BD%D0%B0_%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%80%D1%82%D0%B5

я привел памятники Тарасу Шевченко в соответствие ему
eggie (2024-01-06 19:22:57+00:00): motor_vehicle=no hoeft niet getagd te worden op paaltjes. Het is default
Wel de uitzonderingen. 
fixed is oke. 

Groet
eggie
HubMiner (2023-11-28 07:13:12+00:00): Looks good!  

A cosmetic comment: power poles are attached to side walk.  Try not to link unrelated features, it makes things harder to edit in the future.
empty_child (2023-11-28 09:37:14+00:00): Hello Paul01069,
Are you sure that you edited CORRECT Georgia???
empty_child (2023-11-28 09:40:43+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144540138
Paul01069 (2023-11-28 15:45:10+00:00): empty_child I did not intend to change anything in Georgia.  Please help me.  I wanted to change the name of the "University Park Airport" located in State College, Pennsylvania USA.  What did I do wrong?
empty_child (2023-11-28 15:48:45+00:00): In your changeset you changed amenity for International Black Sea University in Tbilisi, Georgia. I reverted changes back
empty_child (2023-11-28 15:53:07+00:00): I think, you tried to find this aerodrome (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7166663). Be careful next time
Paul01069 (2023-11-28 15:53:26+00:00): Thank you
nevw (2023-11-30 03:12:23+00:00): Hi
if there is a boundary marked by buoys in these waters you might like to map the buoys using the OpenSeaMap http://www.openseamap.org/index.php?id=openseamap&L=1
If the exclusion area is gazetted it may be possible to map in a similar way to habitat protected area to the south.
There is further info on the left side of the link under About OpenSeaMap.
I expect there is a specific way to map special areas that affect maritime users.
Initially you may like to map the buoy specifics and positions and add a description tag until you find out more.
I have found that the OpenStreetMap does not render all marine features.
Tomkn27 (2023-11-30 05:41:08+00:00): OK, thanks.
I'll look into openseamap.
InsertUser (2023-11-29 01:07:22+00:00): The website mentioned in the source says "Bahamas Power and Light © 2023. All rights reserved." and the PDF doesn't seem to indicate anything different. 

Do you have separate permission to adapt this source and if so where is it publicly recorded?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Copyright
NorthCrab_upload (2023-11-28 01:40:48+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11380583502
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11380583504

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-10-26 08:47:37+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11380591054/history has shop = fast_food that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
shop=fast_food ? Is it amenity=fast_food ? If not, what this tag is intended to mean? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dfast_food
Supt_of_Printing (2024-10-26 08:58:38+00:00): My mistake. Corrected.
Zandu (2023-11-28 03:48:43+00:00): Moving tags from ways to relations to minimize overlapping ways.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144528956
Jordan Destifino (2023-11-28 02:58:30+00:00): There was a study done by sociologists at the University of Notre Dame that claimed children involved within a youth group were more positive about life. The main question that this study raises is if the children were more positive because they had a place where they felt they belonged or if they were positive because they were religious.  
https://youthandreligion.nd.edu/related-resources/preliminary-research-findings/sociologists-find-that-religious-teens-are-more-positive-about-life/
Jordan Destifino (2023-11-28 03:09:43+00:00): First Baptist Church is a megachurch, and a good example of symbolic interactionism within religious spheres. Religion takes over many of the social groups the worshipper is in, religion plays a role in the everyday components of life, and there is a distinct relationship between the religious leader and the practitioner.
woodpeck (2023-11-28 10:50:58+00:00): Can you explain the rationale behind adding this "slip lane" (when lanes are not usually mapped as separate geometries in OSM)? I notice it has been removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144312735 after having originally been added by you in a changeset called "routing corrections" but I do not understand for what routing this would be required.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-11-30 00:40:54+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144608142
pza (2023-11-28 02:11:13+00:00): Went for a jog this morning and can confirm that the lanes have been updated as per:
https://www.transport.nsw.gov.au/projects/current-projects/victoria-road-vision/victoria-road-bus-lane-through-rozelle
pza (2023-11-28 02:11:54+00:00): The strange "offset" lane seems to only be used occasionally for left turning, but is otherwise a dead lane.
HubMiner (2023-11-28 07:06:31+00:00): Reviewed: The changeset descriptions are rarely seen by anyone,  That text should be copied to the skate park description,
Zandu (2023-11-28 03:49:43+00:00): Moving tags from ways to relations to minimize overlapping ways.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144529308
Jordan Destifino (2023-11-28 02:25:44+00:00): This spot is a good example of conflict theory. I remember my older sister getting into a fight with one of the people that would hangout there. At this spot there was a clear social hierarchy.
Kovoschiz (2023-11-28 07:25:22+00:00): Tags on a `=construction` or `proposed:highway=` reflects what it will be. Not what it is now.
Kovoschiz (2023-11-28 07:26:40+00:00): You also removed other attributes.
Jordan Destifino (2023-11-28 02:36:39+00:00): The beaches are a vital part of Panama City's economy. Our beaches are a good example of the functionalism concept, our beaches provide leisure and provides for our society.
Zandu (2023-11-28 03:49:04+00:00): Moving tags from ways to relations to minimize overlapping ways.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144529569
Udarian (2023-11-28 03:47:14+00:00): what is this "Accessibility and accommodation" standard you seem to refer to multiple times? also again the disused tagging would from the change set comment seem to better tagging for this, if you are primarily interested in mapping historical objects while OSM has allot of tagging for that from my understanding https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/ is better for that.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-12-29 17:39:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145671439 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed political edits to the status quo ante off the coast of the Philippines.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15535 - hopefully a balanced view will emerge after discussion.
APneunzehn74 (2023-12-22 20:01:44+00:00): Hello Matija Nalis, the four works of art in Baska at 44.97089, 14.7486 and 44.97016, 14.74895 are correct. I can't see any of this in street photos.
Greetings Andreas
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-09-21 18:06:19+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1227263754/history - what you meant by building=maybe ?
APneunzehn74 (2024-09-21 18:40:56+00:00): https://osm.org/go/xd1~sa4vf?node=11380674092
It's about these works of art, I'm not sure if they actually exist.
APneunzehn74 (2024-09-21 18:42:18+00:00): https://osm.org/go/xd1~sa4vf?node=11380674093
Matija Nalis (2024-09-29 03:13:26+00:00): @Mateusz, "building=maybe" meant that it is unclear from aerial view whether that is a building or ruins or something else (parking?...)

When DGU Croatia 2024 aerials get published, perhaps we'd see better. (or if someone on the ground surveys)
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-10-03 16:14:06+00:00): I would say that building=yes with fixme (or just fixme or just note) would be likely better... But maybe it is too far going purism.
Matt_ (2023-11-28 03:11:25+00:00): Please see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/US_National_Inventory_of_Dams
Matt_ (2023-11-28 03:15:28+00:00): Also: https://maproulette.org/browse/challenges/42474
Jordan Destifino (2023-11-28 03:25:06+00:00): Panama City had a jump start on the 'death of third places' due to the hurricane, but since the pandemic this phenomena has been happening in almost every community. The National Library of Medicine published an article on the closure of third places and potential consequences for the collective health and wellbeing are not good. It was stated that "living in neighborhoods with limited access to resources is associated with poorer physical and mental health."
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6934089/
Udarian (2023-11-28 03:30:45+00:00): wouldn't https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused:* be better tagging for this feature based on the change set comment? something like disused:shop=mall.
Udarian (2023-11-28 03:36:59+00:00): also looking at it again opening_hours=NONE seems non standard and has as exemplified by the excessively low counts and 0.00% counts on taginfo (https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/opening_hours#values)(https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/api/4/key/values?key=opening_hours&filter=all&lang=en&sortname=count&sortorder=desc&rp=24&page=1&query=NONE), due to this I would recommend either removing this (implied with the above mentioned disused tagging id think) or on the wiki find a better tagging schema to use, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours
HubMiner (2023-11-28 07:03:51+00:00): You should probaby add a note to the map over the path and mention when the path is likely out of construction, so there is a future reminder to bring it to a normal state.
Zandu (2023-11-28 03:49:21+00:00): Moving tags from ways to relations to minimize overlapping ways.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144530190
Nakaner-repair (2023-11-28 13:49:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 144550072 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by Nizar123 (MAPS.ME edits which look like personal notes)
Nakaner-repair (2023-11-28 13:49:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 144550072 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by Nizar123 (MAPS.ME edits which look like personal notes)
Nakaner-repair (2023-11-28 13:49:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 144550072 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by Nizar123 (MAPS.ME edits which look like personal notes)
Jordan Destifino (2023-11-28 03:37:03+00:00): Pier Park is a good example of how popular shopping is within tourist culture. Also, Pier Park is a good example of how relaxed social norms become when people are on vacation or in an unfamiliar place. For example, things that may be seen as rude or indecent where someone comes from become/are normal behaviors where they are vacationing.
fortera_au (2023-11-28 03:45:01+00:00): Hi there, name should only be used for real names for things, if this area has a real name then please add it to the name tag, otherwise I'd remove template from it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144530271
Nakaner-repair (2023-11-28 13:49:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 144550072 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by Nizar123 (MAPS.ME edits which look like personal notes)
Zandu (2023-11-28 04:36:23+00:00): Moved tags from ways to relations to minimize overlapping ways.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144530506
Supaplex (2024-05-29 04:19:54+00:00): Revert due to it being a fake bus station

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151970013
Zandu (2023-11-28 04:35:15+00:00): Just fixing a broken relation.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144530523
MxxCon (2023-11-28 23:03:47+00:00): This is most definitely NOT correct. You are not supposed to invent feature names on a whim. It's perfectly acceptable if some features do not have a name. This edit will be reverted in full.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144531167
Zandu (2023-11-28 05:05:05+00:00): Moving tags from ways to relations to minimize duplicate ways.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144531267
tyfi (2023-11-28 04:44:34+00:00): Also fixed ref tags on concurrency with Rte. KK and added name to Medicine Creek segment new Newtown
user_5359 (2023-11-28 15:49:17+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I remove your SEO SPAM entry (mostly foreign keys). Please have a look on https://wiki.osm.org!
If you need help, You are welcome!
mataharimau (2023-11-29 16:15:52+00:00): Hi hundenvon, tqvm for your invaluable contributions. May I ask re the definition of this boundary - what is the source?
hundenvonPenang (2023-11-29 16:28:53+00:00): Hi there mataharimau. The definition is from MBPP's Draf Rancangan Tempatan Pulau Pinang (Pulau) 2030 Jilid 1. Original copies can still be viewed here: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1gg6L8Nn_3fOdnW3vERB9uzWoS1qS-kQ0
mataharimau (2023-11-30 02:20:43+00:00): Beautiful work there, hundenvon!
NorthCrab_upload (2023-11-28 05:40:31+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11380788887

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
limes11 (2023-11-28 10:00:00+00:00): Hi Benuel,

liegen hier genehmigte Bauvorhaben vor?

Bitte auch unter source deutlich genauer beschreiben, wo die Information herkommt. Mit den angegebenen Quellen lässt sich nichts konkret anfangen.

Besten Dank und viele Grüße

Limes
limes11 (2023-11-28 10:01:53+00:00): Der Kommentar gilt übrigens für alle Änderungen dieser Art.
woodpeck (2024-02-08 18:11:33+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15681
Nakaner (2024-05-03 09:20:10+00:00): Ich habe soeben alle Änderungen dieses Benutzers, bei denen es um geplante Vorhaben geht, rückgängig gemacht.
Supaplex (2024-05-29 04:19:55+00:00): Revert due to it being a fake bus station

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151970013
HubMiner (2023-11-28 06:57:05+00:00): Reviewed: 
(1) the company description is vague and wordy.
(2) the node has no primary tag.  Possible candidates are company or office, see: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:company 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:office
emersonveenstra (2023-12-01 11:23:37+00:00): Hi there,

You created https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1227284916 and tagged it landuse=retail, but landuse must be a closed area, not a line. Could you go back and fix that? Thanks!
Supaplex (2024-05-29 04:19:56+00:00): Revert due to it being a fake bus station

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151970013
martinst (2023-11-28 18:23:57+00:00): Darf man die Höhenangabe aus Wikipedia übernehmen?
Bruno413 (2023-11-28 20:31:59+00:00): Die Höhenangabe in der Wikipedia ist im Moment ohne Beleg, daher meiner Meining nach keine geeignete Quelle. Auf die Schnelle habe ich aber auch keine andere gefunden. Weder im BayernAtlas noch auf der Digitalen Topographischen Karte der Bayerischen Vermessungsverwaltung ist eine Höhe für das Henneneck angegeben.
subhankara (2024-04-19 10:12:55+00:00): Hi Dear,
After checking the same I have modified the road geometry kindly check.
iloveosm2004 (2024-01-03 10:21:54+00:00): Hi there, sorry for replying so late. According to ground-truth of Mapillary streetview images on OSM (20 Sep 2023), there is no barrier on this stretch of road, drivers (both 2W & 4W) can access and pass normally. If you have any more updated sources, please inform so I would not delete this barrier.
Dimacn (2023-11-28 08:14:23+00:00): Была правильно названа улица: переулок Ушакова. Соглашение о наименовании улиц в OSM https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Россия/Соглашение_об_именовании_дорог