piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2023-04-23 15:57:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:47:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-02-28 23:42:36+00:00): Make sure you're aware what tags a preset will add.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132914647
mavl (2023-04-23 16:00:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:58:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:08:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
ivansanchez (2023-02-23 22:14:38+00:00): Dear Ekaterina,

Please note that you broke a bus route relation (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4049118). iD does not show the relation, but validators (and JOSM) will display the route line as broken (i.e. the members of the relation should form one single unbroken line)

I must ask you and your team to take care of not breaking such relations when you're editing roundabouts.
ivansanchez (2023-02-23 22:24:59+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4049147#map=18/41.61794/-4.70721 - bus routes must contain *only* some parts of the roundabouts they go through.
Ekaterina Butskevich (2023-02-24 13:13:54+00:00): Hi! Thank you very much for your comment! I really made a mistake, next time I will check the bus routes more carefully!

With best wishes, Ekaterina
eggie (2023-02-23 09:38:56+00:00): Dag mustafa... Tip  Probeer voortaan bij te taggen op de adresnode. Dus niet op de gebouwomtrek.
Ik heb de info samengevoegd en de BAG data hersteld. start_date=
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=132914796
MVG
eggie
mavl (2023-04-23 15:57:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:05:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
eggie (2023-02-23 09:42:55+00:00): Dag THR
Tip.. 
Beter niet met die bedrijven schuiven over de kaart.. 
Allen de info kopieren naar het nieuwe adres svp. 
De info heb ik samengevoegd met de adresnode. 
MVG
eggie
mavl (2023-04-23 16:03:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
dressed-pleasekin (2023-03-20 03:39:54+00:00): Hello!

I advise using Maxar or ESRI imagery for purely aerial mapping, they have better resolution and (at least around Almaty) are more recent.

Also, I would like to ask to not snap/connect big areas (landuse, fields) to the road points - it makes it hard to untangle them and edit later.
If it's done only for convenience, you can connect right-click→disconnect to free all points of the new object after you draw it.

Cheers and thank you for mapping this area.
mavl (2023-04-23 16:06:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:53:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:58:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:04:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
aceman444 (2024-12-03 21:39:54+00:00): To parkovisko rybaskeho zvazu je naozaj access=permissive, cize tam moze parkovat ktokolvek, je to vlastnikom tolerovane kym si to nerozmysli?

A ked ho prevadzkuje rybarsky zvaz, nema tam niekde aj sidlo? Napr. v budove 944 ?
moonraver (2024-12-04 09:06:09+00:00): Budova vedla je schatrala,je na nej tag abandoned=yes. Areal okolo je zanedbany. Parkovisko nema zakaz vjazdu ani napis sukromny pozemok,nieje strazene,ale je na sukr.pozemku,od priehrady je zakaz vjazdu ale odinokade sa tam da dostat /vsetky pristup. cesty nie su dorobene/. V tomto pripade to bolo pre mna najvhodnejsie dat to takto.Ak treba,zmenime.
mavl (2023-04-23 16:09:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
muchichka_s (2023-02-23 09:41:30+00:00): На скільки мені відомо "Кубикова вулиця" - названа не на честь людини, тобто назва походить від прикметника і слово вулиця має бути в кінці, то я поверну, як було. Але якщо є інші дані, то можете повернути назад
mavl (2023-04-23 16:12:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:58:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
Langlaeufer (2023-02-23 10:04:07+00:00): Hallo nicht Gefunden.
Ich hab die seperaten Gehwege wieder entfernt. Das bring hier nur Nachteile. Es wird nicht mehr deutlich wo man die Straße überqueren kann. Zudem war der immer noch als Attribut des Straße - also doppelt - erfasst. Die Verbindungen zwischen Ausfahrten, Gehwege und Straße waren unvollständig.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132915374
kapazao (2023-02-23 15:08:08+00:00): Hello, please when you add new rondabouts and other way connections like this you should check all the tags.
It is important to check the names in roundabouts and use noname=yes if they do not have a name. Do not keep the name of the ways you separated.
The other tags should be checked too. You are adding some connections with 2 lanes when there is only 1 lane.
Also it would be good if you could complete information about lanes or surface if it does not exists.

Thank you for your contributions, regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132915549
Vika_Nosovich (2023-02-24 08:17:49+00:00): Dear kapazao, thank you for your comment.
I agree with you about road tagging. I corrected my mistakes.
Best regards
mavl (2023-04-23 16:03:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:00:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:05:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:08:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:52:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
eggie (2023-02-23 11:50:36+00:00): Dag Bram  Je vraagt feedback..

Wanneer dat staat aangegeven dan zou het correct zijn.
Maar hoe komen die auto's langs die slingerhekjes? Ook is hier geen enkele noodzaak om te laden en te lossen, want het pad heeft geen enkele verbinding met de woningen?
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=132916019

MVG
eggie
Bram bwaste (2023-02-23 12:37:13+00:00): Hallo Eggie,

Excuses, ik had de verkeerde Schoolstraat aangepast (deze is niet zichtbaar op Goole Maps). Ik heb de aanpassing teruggedraaid en toegepast op het andere deel (links ongeveer paralel). Op Google Maps is een bord zichtbaar "uitzondering laden en lossen". dank voor je hulp.

Mvg, Bram
eggie (2023-02-23 12:40:40+00:00): Hoi Bram... Dan zal het nu vast wel correct zijn 😀
Gr eggie
mavl (2023-04-23 16:08:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:05:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
MxxCon (2023-02-25 02:24:38+00:00): Thank you for fixing this.👍
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132916083
mavl (2023-04-23 16:07:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:53:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:06:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:50:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:12:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:57:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:04:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:59:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:01:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-28 20:22:29+00:00): Looks good!  Keep up the good work!  :D
mavl (2023-04-23 15:54:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:50:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
wkdgs (2023-02-24 10:24:59+00:00): Die waren auch als normale Hecken eingetragen, also korrekt gemappt. Habe die Änderungen daher wieder rückgängig gemacht.
mavl (2023-04-23 16:03:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:02:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:07:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
Warin61 (2023-02-26 23:59:50+00:00): Hi
Way: 1148772981 looks to me to be more landuse=commercial rather than landuse=residential???
mavl (2023-04-23 16:06:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
Langlaeufer (2023-02-23 10:25:25+00:00): Du hast die Treppe bis zur Leitplanke verlängert. Hier eine Verbindung zu schaffen die man gar nicht nutzen kann ist keine Gute Idee. Vielmehr muss hier geprüft werden wo die Route wirklich verläuft und ob diese überhaupt vor Ort noch existiert.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132917257
mavl (2023-04-23 15:50:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:47:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:02:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:11:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:56:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:07:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:06:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:57:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:51:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
SomeoneElse (2023-07-01 13:01:03+00:00): Hello,
Poundland https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10687900249/history has "wheelchair=t" on it.  Is that a yes or a no, or something else?
Regards,
Andy
TonyS999 (2023-07-02 09:17:44+00:00): Hi Andy
Corrected to wheelchair=yes.  Finger trouble.
Cheers - Tony
SomeoneElse (2023-07-02 10:32:08+00:00): Thanks!
mavl (2023-04-23 16:11:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:03:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:05:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
dkf2010 (2023-02-26 18:02:21+00:00): Das war leider falsch herum.
Der nördliche Weg ist asphaltiert (nicht der südliche)

Habe es nun hier korrigiert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133053625#map=18/53.61377/9.92333

(Ref.: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3565631 )
Compatie (2023-02-23 14:43:27+00:00): Bonjour Laurent,

Je n'ai pas l'impression que ce soit une faute de frappe, en effet les deux noms semblent coexister dans la régions d'après le cadastre, Rozier un peu plus au nord que Roier. Ainsi il faudrait ajouter l'autre nom. Cependant une erreur peu venir du cadastre, si c'est le cas tout est bon.

Cordialement
BARBAT Laurent (2023-02-23 17:05:41+00:00): Bonjour,
Merci pour votre commentaire. Je ne savais pas que Rohier est aussi utilisé à d'autres endroits. Mais en l'occurrence c'est bien le cadastre qui a une erreur. 
Je suis maire adjoint de Cause de Clérans, j'habite juste à côté et je peux garantir que le vrai nom est "Le Rozier" (avec un z, et au singulier).
C'est difficile de faire corriger le cadastre, malheureusement. Alors j'essaye de rétablir les vrais noms sur la carte.
Cordialement.
dx125 (2023-02-23 12:06:44+00:00): Hallo,

Du hast in diesem Changeset den Weg 4521228 gelöscht, schau mal bitte hier:
https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=132917936

Gruß
dx125
Irrfahrt (2023-02-23 14:15:08+00:00): Hej,

Danke für den Hinweis! Ich hoffe, das der Weg jetzt wieder korrekt ist.

Beste Grüße
Irrfahrt
mavl (2023-04-23 15:58:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
EdLoach (2023-02-23 11:58:10+00:00): Thanks. Funnily enough I went to survey the box when you removed it and I was sure it was definitely gone then, so looks like it has been replaced. Or I checked the wrong place when I was out.
EdLoach (2023-02-23 11:59:03+00:00): Looks like it reappeared somewhere between my October and November Mapillary images.
RaccoonFederation (2023-02-23 14:52:37+00:00): Yes, I thought I had made a mistake but it was blocked off for a while
mavl (2023-04-23 15:59:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:11:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:07:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mueschel (2023-02-24 10:46:42+00:00): Hi,
welcome to OSM!
In OSM we have to use a well-defined set of tags to allow all the software tools to understand the data and e.g. show it on maps.
Please make sure that you only use tags that are documented in the Wiki or are available as presets in your editor.

E.g. these tags are not used in any other place and should be replaced by a common and documented tag, e.g. 'species':

lichen 4
lichen-6
lichen_3
Lichen 2

And also note:
- the species of a tree is not its 'name'. It should be tagged as 'species'.
- don't use natural=wood for single trees. These are natural=tree