piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
DutchTreat (2024-02-15 23:44:59+00:00): Refer to https://planning.dc.gov/publication/925-15th-street-nw-bf-saul-building
adiatmad (2024-02-19 09:33:21+00:00): Hi, could you please explain why you changed the tag to barrier=city_wall? I couldn't confirm it from satellite imagery alone. Appreciate your insight. Thanks!

(https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1061562363)
oba510 (2024-02-22 10:33:05+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

It looks like the 2-way bikeway /cycle track along Battery has already been mapped as a property of the street itself (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway#Cycle_tracks for more info), and the way you drew is basically duplicating what's already on the map.  You can get an idea of what bicycle infrastructure is already mapped by clicking on the layers button at the right side of the OSM website and looking at the "CyclOSM" or "Cycle Map" layers. CyclOSM is better but can be slow to load.
graue (2024-03-22 09:52:17+00:00): Yeah, this should be removed unless there's a reason for the bike lane to be mapped separately - and I don't see one. The tags for Battery Street itself cover it.
kevinchen1 (2024-05-03 06:23:51+00:00): Since there is no response I have reverted it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150821257
Hugoren Martinako (2024-02-16 08:21:11+00:00): Buenas,
Has cambiado erróneamente todas las referencias del INE para usar el código de la entidad singular. En el hilo que te facilité ayer se explica porqué ese valor no se debe usar.
Completé la isla entera de la Palma hace dos o tres meses, por lo que no es necesario cambiar ninguna referencia, ya están todas.
Saludos
aTarom (2024-02-16 08:42:17+00:00): las alturas las obtienes del IGN o del INE?
por ejemplo:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1437814738/history
hay más de 200 metros de diferencia respecto a la cota del ráster IGN
Saludos
alejandroacmo (2024-02-16 16:37:47+00:00): Intentaré revertir todos los cambios realizados. Estaba sacando los dados de altura del IGN. Disculpa las molestias y los problemas.
MxxCon (2024-02-23 15:57:23+00:00): Hello.
Pease note that addr:street:short_name= is an invalid tag and should not be used
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147512173
simo_explorer (2024-02-18 19:34:08+00:00): what is this tag? "Bosque = Bosque"  
I recommend checking  
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/
iigmir (2024-02-22 15:40:07+00:00): Hi Mdm García, 
Are you indicating that this area is a forest? If so, please refer to the OSM wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Forest

¿Estás indicando que esta zona es un bosque? Si es así, consulte la OSM wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Bosque
WC392309 (2024-02-22 20:34:42+00:00): I would keep the stretch from LCP to Northstar Primary because it serves as a main E-W route into Brambleton as well as having some shops/commercial spaces nearby
Joseph R P (2024-02-23 19:05:47+00:00): I am actually quite torn on what the best classification for Ryan Road would be since it is a relatively busy route that connects other primary routes and a major commercial/residential area, which I think are good criteria for making it a primary route, however, it's not as significant as the other nearby primary routes that it connects to (Evergreen Mills, Northstar, and LCP), which serve as cross-county routes vs. Ryan Road which is more functionally comparative to the secondary segment of Belmont Ridge Road or the other E-W routes Creighton Road and Croson Lane. I think I'll leave it primary for now and wait until the construction finishes to analyze traffic patterns in a fully-built-up area to see which roads local traffic favors.
lipuma (2024-11-29 09:00:03+00:00): Hi GPYes, how did you manage to get Maxar imagery? I thought they didn't give out keys to OSM anymore.

- lipuma
GPYes (2024-12-02 22:31:33+00:00): Hi, thanks for the question. Apple has an agreement with Maxar to use their more recent imagery to edit OpenStreetMap, which is not publicly available for editing OpenStreetMap. We generally use the imagery that is already available in JOSM but where we do use that more recent imagery, we always cite it and the date the imagery is from in the changeset source. Hopefully this answers your question!
lipuma (2024-12-02 22:35:20+00:00): Thanks for your response! I understand now. Would you happen to know what the most up-to-date free to use imagery is in Mexico?
GPYes (2024-12-04 17:33:42+00:00): Hi lipuma, thanks for the follow-up question. The most recent free to use imageries in Mexico are Bing aerial imagery and Esri World Imagery depending on the specific location. Building footprint development and street alignment can be helpful in determining the most recent imagery per location. I hope this is helpful!
lipuma (2024-12-05 19:16:37+00:00): Thank you!! Happy mapping~
habi (2024-04-02 12:30:59+00:00): Ciao Globis

Adding the Hydropower project https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1250980010/ as *one* single building to OpenStreetMap probably does not make sense.
If construction has already stated in a zone as big as this, you could map it as `landuse=construction`, otherwise I would refrain from mapping it already.

Have a good day,
habi

PS: I'm here because this is currently one of the 10 largest buildings in OpenStreetMap: https://c.osm.org/t/111251
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-11-01 08:29:29+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11628670370/history has shop = vape that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
shop=vape ? Could it be tagged as https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=e-cigarette (if shop=vape / shop=vaping / shop=vape_store is needed - how it differs or is better than shop=e-cigarette ?)
OilStation (2024-02-16 12:58:04+00:00): 有兴趣试试JOSM吗？可以让编辑过程轻松不少
ywanght (2024-03-09 02:51:22+00:00): 感谢推荐，以前尝试过，一直不得要领，最近准备在Mac上试试。但是最近梯子不稳定，很难连上openstreet 服务器，所以也就搁置了。
OilStation (2024-03-13 13:22:26+00:00): 要领就是看教程然后边学边画。当然了，用着顺手才是最重要的。
也可以尝试一下RapID editor，与ID editor一样都是网页编辑器。主要特色是它使用了AI来辅助绘制道路，基本上改个道路类型就能上传了，像山上的林道之类的很适合。
OSM_RogerWilco (2024-02-16 03:43:09+00:00): Hi wermark,
bitte nur die Zufahrtsgassen als parking_aisle (Parklatzweg) taggen, die auf größeren Parkplätzen nur Nebenwege zu den Parkplätzen sind. Normale Parkplatzzufahrten, bleiben highway=service ohne Zusatz. Also nur die Wege als parking_aisle taggen, die wirklich nur zum Erreichen des Stellplatzes dienen und nicht der generellen Zufahrt. 

Siehe hierzu:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:service%3Dparking_aisle
und https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dparking
literan (2024-02-24 09:15:12+00:00): не надо отрисовывать уже снесенные здания
literan (2024-02-24 09:12:08+00:00): здание  отрисовано поверх дороги
Tomaussie_17 (2024-04-02 06:35:56+00:00): Where did the name Broad Gully Creek come from? I know broad gully wetland is correct as it appears on Vicplan and the Melbourne Water information display but im not so sure about the creek itself. The Nillumbik Flood emergency plan refers to it as "Broad Gully Road Drain" 
I don't mean to nitpick as your edits are so incredibly detailed (Were inspiration for some of my own micromapping) and really add to the map in the Northeast. 
Thanks,
Tom
ScottyThePilko (2024-04-02 07:54:52+00:00): Hey Tom, I thought I had gotten the name from MapShare Vic but it seems like I may have conflated Broad Gully with similar naming conventions in the area such as Sawpit Gully/Creek, Scrubby Creek, Watery Gully Creek etc. Will remove the name and think about changing it to Broad Gully Road Drain instead (despite the distance from Broad Gully Road itself?). Thanks for the "nitpick" though - keeps the map accurate and the editors honest.
Tomaussie_17 (2024-04-02 09:24:34+00:00): Hi Scotty,
It's a weird one?!
From the looks of things there are 3 Broad Gullies in Nillumbik. 
There is one to the north which actually does cross Broad Gully Road; and is named on Mapsharevic
and there is another up near St Andrews North.
I suspect that the watercourse in question wasn't important enough to warrant a name prior to urbanisation and was simply given the unimaginative name of the major road it crossed (Broad Gully Road near Amaroo Court) when it was undergrounded by MMBW. This naming practice can be seen in other drains in the area such as the Bible Street Drain, Zig Zag Road Drain and Allendale Road drain to name a few.
I'll look into it via the Diamond Creek Catchment Study and other resources the next time i'm at Diamond Valley Library in search of a different name - as this kind of thing interests me. However, I suspect that history never got around to recording a name for the drain until it was too late. :/
Keep up the excellent work! Diamond Creek's never looked so good ;)
archie (2024-02-16 08:16:26+00:00): Rysslands konsulat (general) har stängts. Varför taggar du det?

https://sverigesradio.se/artikel/ryska-konsulatet-i-goteborg-stangt-fortfarande-rysk-mark
archie (2024-02-17 11:39:03+00:00): Har det ryska konsulatet öppnats igen? Det stängdes samtidigt som Sveriges konsulat i Sankt Petersburg fick stängas. Nu finns det - efter din taggning - alltså en rysk konsulär beskickning igen i Göteborg.  Vilka uppgifter har du som gjorde att du taggade så här?
archie (2024-02-20 14:58:26+00:00): Fortfarande inte något besked om varför du lade in taggar för konsulat på det nedlagda ryska generalkonsulatet. Varför? Är det möjligtvis uppgifterna i pressen om att ryssland fortfarande äger fastigheten? I så fall är rätt taggning "owner"="Ryska federationen".

Vänligen se till att få bort konsulats-taggarna. Det finns specialkartor resp förteckningar som bygger på osm-data av vilka det nu felaktigt framgår att det finns ett rysk konsulat i Göteborg. Eller har du andra uppgifter?

Om du vill lägga in konsulat så kan du lägga in följande:

1) här https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/57.70067/11.94916 ligger Belgiens konsulat,

2) här (Sigmahuset) https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/57.70602/11.94052 ligger kansliet för Ukrainas honorärkonsul.

Lita på mig eller kolla själv.
ElliottPlack (2024-02-16 04:41:50+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 147119025, 147397568, 147397714.
Sajeevini sivajothy (2024-05-21 16:56:14+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. But remember to include a clear changeset comment, for example: "Created Building, Place Name, District Name, Country Name, and Suitable Hastag."
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147515487
Sajeevini sivajothy (2024-05-21 17:20:12+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. But remember to include a clear changeset comment, for example: "Created Building, Place Name, District Names, Country Name, and Suitable Hashtag."
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147515508
Sajeevini sivajothy (2024-05-22 05:42:14+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. But remember to include a clear changeset comment, for example: "Created Building, Place Name, District Names, Country Name, and Suitable Hashtag"
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147515511
Sajeevini sivajothy (2024-05-21 17:08:26+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in-between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

 This is not a Building it looks like a Grassland So when you start editing, most importantly Please give the Correct tag  and remember to include a clear changeset comment, for example: "Created Landcover, Place Name, District Name, Country Name, and Suitable Hashtag.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147515515
sirorezka (2024-02-16 15:32:04+00:00): Здравствуйте, ваше здание попало на дорогу и на забор. Кроме того есть предположение, что вы отрисовали временный объект типа бытовки. Уточните, пожалуйста, локацию ваших изменнеий.
Dimon4ik91 (2024-02-16 16:44:59+00:00):  действительно это не здание, попешила, я удалила его с карты 147540064,
Sajeevini sivajothy (2024-05-21 16:53:18+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. remember to include a clear changeset comment, for example: "Created Landuse, Place Name, District Names, Country Name, and Suitable Name."
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147515545
Sajeevini sivajothy (2024-05-21 16:59:07+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.But remember to include a clear changeset comment, for example: "Created Landuse, Place Name, District Names, Country Name, and Suitable Hastag."
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147515545
Sajeevini sivajothy (2024-06-23 05:05:21+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work, and it looks good.#OMGuru#OSMCha
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147515545
Sajeevini sivajothy (2024-05-21 16:35:50+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. But remember to include a clear changeset comment, for example: "Created Landuse, Place Name, District Names, Country Name, and Suitable Name."
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147515556
Sajeevini sivajothy (2024-05-21 14:34:56+00:00): This application requires me to evaluate everything as either good or bad, with no middle ground. If I mark something as bad, it could simply be because it doesn't adhere to the OSM tagging scheme. I will provide a changeset comment explaining my findings.

Please accurately mark the feature on the map and remember to include a clear changeset comment, for example: "Created Landuse, Place Name, District Names, Country Name, and Suitable Name."
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147515558
Sajeevini sivajothy (2024-05-21 14:27:53+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. Remember to include a clear Changeset Comment, for example: "Created Building, Place Name, District Names, Country Name, and Suitable Name."
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147515568
Sajeevini sivajothy (2024-05-21 14:20:08+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. Remember to include a clear Changeset Comment, for example: "Created Building, Place Name, District Names, Country Name, and Suitable Name."
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147515570
Sajeevini sivajothy (2024-05-21 14:06:12+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good, but please try to use a good Changeset Comment. For example: "Created building, place, district name, country name, and suitable hashtag."
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147515620
Sajeevini sivajothy (2024-06-23 06:31:06+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work, and it looks good.#OMGuru#OSMCha
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147515636
Sajeevini sivajothy (2024-06-23 06:28:44+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work, and it looks good.#OMGuru#OSMCha
But please draw accurately and Use the "Q" key to change the square building.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147515653
sirorezka (2024-02-16 15:27:47+00:00): Здравствуйте, у вас здание попало на дорогу. Можете уточнить местоположение оъектов, пожалуйста.
Dimon4ik91 (2024-02-16 17:44:44+00:00): стараюь не попадать на дороги и делать ровно 147539805
KiloThree (2024-02-16 05:34:14+00:00): Hello, please try to keep your changesets constrained to a small area. Since this changeset includes a powerline in Washington state and a building in Sri Lanka, the bounding box covers a decent chunk of the world, and so this changeset will show up for anyone looking at history or reviewing changes in any areas covered by that bounding box
Allison P (2024-02-17 03:30:26+00:00): The powerline edit was probably accidental, since there is no tower there
Sajeevini sivajothy (2024-05-21 07:11:13+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in-between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

Wrong Tag and Please Draw Accurately Also Please give a Suitable Changest Comment for example "Created Playground, Place Name, District Name, Country Name and Suitable Hastage " #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147515700
Sajeevini sivajothy (2024-05-21 06:55:03+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in-between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

There are two buildings But you Digitize as one Building and Also the Shape is not Accurate. So next time please concentrate on that.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147515722
Sajeevini sivajothy (2024-06-23 06:27:10+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work, and it looks good.#OMGuru#OSMCha
But please draw accurately and Use the "Q" key to change the square building.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147515745
Sajeevini sivajothy (2024-06-23 06:23:31+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work, and it looks good.#OMGuru#OSMCha
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147515756
Sajeevini sivajothy (2024-05-21 06:51:18+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. modify Accurately.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147515758
Sajeevini sivajothy (2024-05-21 06:42:25+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work, and it looks good. Next time, try to draw a square building. Use the "Q" key.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147515772
Sajeevini sivajothy (2024-05-21 06:44:45+00:00): And in your change comment, please mention what you created. For example, "Name of place, District, Country - Created building." Other Wise It Looks Good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147515772
Sajeevini sivajothy (2024-05-21 06:38:15+00:00): This app requires me to categorize everything as either good or bad, with no middle ground. When I mark something as bad, it might simply be due to it not aligning with the OSM tagging scheme. I will provide a changeset comment explaining what I found. Please focus on your editing next time, as I noticed that buildings and roads are overlapping, and the buildings are not square. Thank you
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147515778
Sajeevini sivajothy (2024-06-23 06:20:27+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work, and it looks good.#OMGuru#OSMCha
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147515789
Sajeevini sivajothy (2024-05-21 06:02:08+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I have reviewed your work and it looks good. However, when you tag it as Building Name, please do not include "Building". For example: Shop="Amritha Stotres" (if you 100% know the name).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147515812
Sajeevini sivajothy (2024-05-20 10:05:09+00:00): Thank you for your edit and Changest Comment. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147515842
Sajeevini sivajothy (2024-05-20 09:52:48+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work, and it looks good. Please include what you created in your change comment, for example, "Created Road, ---------, ------------".
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147515851
Sajeevini sivajothy (2024-05-20 09:44:55+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I have reviewed your work, and it looks good. However, you need to develop your detailed change comment. For example,  if you created a road Changest Comment "Created road, district, province_country, and suitable hashtag."
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147515861
Sajeevini sivajothy (2024-05-20 09:19:16+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I have reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147515866
pitscheplatsch (2024-02-18 12:15:55+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147596568
Sajeevini sivajothy (2024-05-20 09:04:52+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I have reviewed your work and it looks good. However, try to draw a square building next time using the "Q" key.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147516308
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2024-02-17 11:12:56+00:00): Thanks for editing this park. However, please do not connect landuse with roads, since it makes it very difficult to edit roads and add sidewalks and footpaths then, since everything is connected. I fixed it in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147565946
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2024-02-17 11:15:37+00:00): Also, please use this offset when editing precise data in the Montreal area using the Bing 2020 imagery:
0.6, -1.54
as explained here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Montr%C3%A9al under Bing Maps offset

Thanks!
hewin (2024-02-20 22:38:48+00:00): Thanks very much for the information!
CoderThomas (2024-02-16 22:48:13+00:00): The traces of these buildings is really accurate, and I was wondering if you might have any tricks/tips for mapping buildings that I could learn from?
Skyline1649 (2024-02-20 05:22:52+00:00): Hi Thomas, I use JOSM to do the tracing (as it allows for greater zooming). I also use the LINZ data set for the aerial imagery, which is the most accurate for the area.
simo_explorer (2024-02-18 18:31:53+00:00): Before starting it is important to read the documentation:  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop
arjunaraoc (2024-03-04 09:13:21+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  

Reverted your changeset, as deprecated and incorrect tags were used. see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148196373
rene78 (2024-02-17 17:53:14+00:00): Hi Sithuaunggg!

I think something went wrong here. You named a river "Oak Zanar Street".

Regards
Rene