piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
wegavision (2025-08-18 13:25:19+00:00): Mal eine andere Frage, da du ja der destination-man bist. Was macht man wenn ein symbol ohne Text auf dem Schild ist. Ich lasse es dann bei dem Text leer und zumindest mit deinem Validator funktioniert es, wobei der JOSM-Validator das als möglichen Fehler anzeigt.
mueschel (2025-08-18 13:55:41+00:00): Ja, so ist der "übliche" Weg.
mueschel (2025-08-12 09:58:40+00:00): Hallo,
die Details an einem seit Jahren nicht mehr verwendeten Telefon, das auch nie wieder in Betrieb gehen wird, können wohl wirklich bedenkenlos gelöscht werden und brauchen nicht wieder hinzugefügt zu werden.
Euskirchener (2025-08-12 10:19:52+00:00): Hallo mueschel,
ich weiß nicht wie die Pläne der Telekom sind. Ob das nie wieder in Betrieb gehen wird, ist mir unklar. Das und die Tatsache, dass es da noch steht, lässt mich den Node dort noch stehen und nicht löschen.
Und da war mir nur das Anliegen im Bezug auf den Edit des Vorgängers, dass wenn schon denn schon entweder alle Tags einheitlich mit Lifecycle Prefix versehen werden oder alles wegkommt, aber keine halben Sachen und teilweises Löschen von Infos. Denn für den Fall, dass es wieder repariert wird, sind die Infos dann nicht weg bzw. z.B. für Anfänger umständlich in der Historie versteckt, sondern man muss die Tags nur wieder „aktiv“ setzen indem man den Prefix entfernt.
Gruß
Euskirchener
mueschel (2025-08-12 10:29:12+00:00): Es gibt seit Januar 2023 keine einzige funktionierende Telekom-Telefonzelle mehr.
Die Tags die stehengelassen worden waren beschreiben das Objekt wie es jetzt da ist gut.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-08-04 18:31:16+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12246703812
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12246703811
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/908872705
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/908873506

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Barroszt (2025-08-04 20:41:44+00:00): zrobione
YomanNH (2025-09-03 09:11:17+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1420029627

Ten budynek i kilka obok są takie nierówne? Wątpię... Więcej staranności! Nie chodzi o zrobienie jak najszybciej wielu byle jakich zmian, tylko chociaż o odrobinę estetyki.
Barroszt (2025-09-03 20:31:08+00:00): Akurat ta okolica jest zmapowana estetycznie, ale tutaj coś nie wyszło :/ poprawię
NorthCrab_upload (2025-08-04 18:41:12+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/908873428

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Barroszt (2025-08-04 20:08:24+00:00): zrobione
eggie (2026-03-30 11:03:18+00:00): Hoi Aansluiting Groeneweg met fietspad ook ontdaan van bicycle en foot =use _sidepath
Had ook niets met routes van doen.

Groet,
eggie
bxl-forever (2025-08-04 20:11:15+00:00): Hello, ollegol,

Such a short changeset description makes it difficult to understand what errors had to be fixed here.  It does not seem very obvious.

What we see here is that you removed "cycleway:both=no" from several roads, e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23170443/history or https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/328162350/history,
Those were tags which you added yourself in an earlier StreetComplete session.

cycleway:both=no means that there is no special infrastructure for cyclists, i.e. no paintings, nor lane nor cycle track.

Upon examining Mapillary and aerial imagery from the various streets you modified, it looks like those tags were good.  It is not obvious why you are undoing your own previous work.

Same for your other changeset two minutes earlier: deleting apparent good map data and naming this a "correction".

Can you please briefly explain if there is something special going up here.  Has something changed recently in this area?

Thanks.
ollegol (2025-08-05 13:45:02+00:00): Hello bxl-forever, I modified cycleway tags by using the SCEE app on my phone. Some tags have not so obvious meaning in the app. So I guessed that I had wrongly defined some roads as "forbidden to cycles" instead of defining no specific lanes. Therefore, I tried to correct  those mistakes ...
lmum (2025-08-19 17:55:08+00:00): Hi NIWE1, the leisure=park tag is used for recreational parks, not car parking lots (amenity=parking). Since the parking lots were already mapped, I've removed the park areas you added.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-08-11 02:21:55+00:00): These roads should not be connected. A turn restriction is not the solution.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169971414
marczoutendijk_repair (2025-08-04 18:50:17+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 169332285, 169353056, 169374166, 169374799, 169376163, 169382312, 169387086, 169403968, 169411255, 169431438, 169435138, 169439860, 169445944, 169449984, 169484437, 169508736, 169543422, 169546093, 169549786, 169594362, 169605239, 169648762, 169656880, 169662017, 169698904, 169700765, 169707485, 169748639, 169750012, 169756572, 169761238, 169797370, 169804868, 169805887, 169808886.
marczoutendijk (2025-08-04 19:00:33+00:00): This DWG revert is related to the assigning of undocumented housenumbers with the help of the name tag instead of using the addr:housenumber tag.
weblogdryads (2026-03-26 15:48:46+00:00): some of the sidewalks on glenoaks blvd north are incorrect
Aparna Manjery (2026-03-31 09:57:39+00:00): Apologies for the mistake. I have reverted the edit. Thank you for your valuable feedback. Aparna Manjery
custodiankeyy (2025-08-05 19:11:30+00:00): Merhaba, belirtilen bölgenin hava görüntüsünde (12 Mart 2025) bina bile bulunmamakta. Orada gerçekten de tekel bayii bulunuyor mu?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1039058089
karanet (2025-08-05 21:04:20+00:00): https://share.google/auzU2Jva1O0L79abb

kontrol edeblirsin
custodiankeyy (2025-08-05 21:22:04+00:00): Verdiğin linke göre tekel, park arazisinde değil de binanın altında gözüküyor. Yanlışsam düzeltin lütfen.
karanet (2025-08-05 21:40:57+00:00): düzeltmeyi yaptım tşk
James Derrick (2026-03-03 13:16:51+00:00): Hi T3rR0rM0nk3y,
Welcome to the OSM community!

Please don't use copyrighted data from Google to contribute to OSM as it it against their terms of service:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#Why_don't_you_just_use_Google_Maps/whoever_for_your_data?

Thanks for the edits you have made to make the free map better!
Happy Mapping,

James
T3rR0rM0nk3y (2026-03-03 13:23:23+00:00): Hi James,

You are completely wrong. I live on the street and all of this information is being submitted by myself as I see it with my own eyes. IF you are referring to my Google reference, I was just mentioning that the street is now showing on Google as well and I wanted OpenStreetMap to have it showing on here too so thus why I added it. I was never using Google data to create my edits. I did them all by looking at the street in person and making the changes myself from memory and photos I took on my person phone.
James Derrick (2026-03-03 13:38:44+00:00): Hi,
Thanks for confirming that you are in fact not using their (c) material.

Please remember you are dealing with other community members.

Thanks again for the edits you have made to make the free map better.
Happy Mapping,

James
T3rR0rM0nk3y (2026-03-03 13:41:03+00:00): Hi James. No problem. I def wanna make this place great and thanks for your help as well. :)
James Derrick (2026-03-03 13:52:00+00:00): Hi, 
If it helps, an easy way to add detail to OSM is with the Street Complete app:
https://streetcomplete.app/

Building detail can only be added as imagery gets released (just added  detail from new ESRI and a survey), but Street Complete can add detail almost anywhere.

Thanks again for the edits you have made to make the free map better.
Happy Mapping,

James
felipeeugenio (2025-08-04 19:11:47+00:00): Note	Contributor	Tmstmp UTC	Action	Comment
4892110 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-08-04 21:09	closed	ok
4892105 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-08-04 21:09	closed	ok.
4892085 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-08-04 21:09	closed	ok.
4892080 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-08-04 21:09	closed	ok.
4892075 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-08-04 21:09	closed	ok.
4892103 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-08-04 21:09	closed	ok.
4892098 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-08-04 21:09	closed	ok.
4892111 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-08-04 21:09	closed	ok.
4892078 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-08-04 21:09	closed	ok.
4892106 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-08-04 21:09	closed	ok.
4892101 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-08-04 21:09	closed	ok.
4892096 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-08-04 21:09	closed	ok.
4892063 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-08-04 21:09	closed	ok.
4892086 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-08-04 21:09	closed	ok
4892081 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-08-04 21:09	closed	ok.
4892109 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-08-04 21:09	closed	ok.
4892099 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-08-04 21:09	closed	ok.
4892061 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-08-04 21:09	closed	ok.
4892056 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-08-04 21:09	closed	ok.
4892084 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-08-04 21:08	closed	ok.
4892112 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-08-04 21:08	closed	ok.
4892107 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-08-04 21:08	closed	ok.
4892069 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-08-04 21:08	closed	ok.
4892092 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-08-04 21:08	closed	ok.
4892054 (iD)	felipeeugenio	2025-08-04 21:08	closed	?
texent (2025-08-04 19:20:00+00:00): 訂正:高速出入り口ではなく、大阪臨海線の高石側出入り口
ceirios (2025-08-04 20:25:41+00:00): Hi Stephan, welcome to OSM

Could you please write more detailed changeset comments instead of "."? This helps others around you know what you've been working on! This page on the wiki may be able to help you:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

You can also make more than a couple of changes at a time, in case that's something you were worried about as well.

Diolch,
Ceirios
Glassman (2025-08-05 21:15:34+00:00): #TIP: instead of deleting and re-adding the feature, just move the feature and update tags as needed which save the history of the object.
citrula (2025-08-04 22:22:00+00:00): reverted for using "Google Maps" as a source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169978761
MassCartog (2025-08-05 00:28:16+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM. The features you removed in this changeset seem valid. Please don’t remove valid OSM data.

You have a new account and might not be aware, On OSM, we do not removed features if they exist on the ground. If it exists on the ground, it is valid data regardless of a feature being public, or private, designated or informal/illegal/unauthorized. Removing them is actually considered vandalism.

I've been looking through your edits, and it seems like it's just mass deleting "closed" trails. Again, if a trail is closed this is not a valid reason to remove it. 

The correct way to handle this is to use OSM's tagging system. access=no would be appropriate if they are closed to the public. Once this is done, services that do use OSM data will reflect that and specify their access.

See heatmap data for the last 12 months, It's pretty clear this trails still exists on the ground.

https://i.imgur.com/IJSadWk.jpeg

You have said it in your changeset descriptions, some of these trails have been closed or decommissioned for years, yet there is a ton of heat map activity along them in the last 12 months. This points to them still existing on the ground in some form. Again, unless they do not exist at all, we don't remove them from OSM.

Please read this for more info:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won't_delete_roads_on_private_property

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F
user_5359 (2025-08-05 14:07:02+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on the corrected conditional key. there is no difference between access and access:conditional value (booth private)
Nick Kimbrough (2025-08-06 20:49:31+00:00): Great, thank you!
joost schouppe (2025-09-04 09:18:03+00:00): You added building=lieudeculte here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/248702276
I'll fix it, but maybe check if you added other weird building values
citrula (2025-08-04 22:14:21+00:00): Welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contribution. building=* ways are supposed to match the footprint of the actual building, and not the plot - I went ahead and remapped the address as a node, and added the streets without names. Hope this helps with your troubles (although it probably won't for Google and Apple maps, specifically)
MassCartog (2025-08-05 00:31:38+00:00): Please don't use the Name field as a description!
user_5359 (2025-08-05 07:29:54+00:00): Welcome to OSM! 

Short hint for the value of the key service_times. Is the service held every day or only on Sundays? In the latter case, you forgot the day abbreviation Su. 
By the way, we write the time in 24-hour notation and do not abbreviate minutes.
eggie (2025-08-04 20:23:30+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-08-04 20:25:26+00:00): Hoi,

Waarom access=no?
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=169975043
MVG
eggie
Empty Block (2025-08-05 04:20:10+00:00): Omdat het toegang voor fietsen is en dus geen toegang voor iedereen. Maar met de naam erbij en alleen voor fietsen is het wel wat dubbel dus heb hem verwijderd. Dankjewel voor de tip.
eggie (2025-08-05 06:44:00+00:00): 👍
Buraddo (2025-08-06 12:40:19+00:00): Intersection has been changed during latesst weekend as construction progressed. Why did you delete the new intersection and remap the old one?
dcskobuffs (2025-08-06 22:04:46+00:00): Hello Buraddo,
Thank you for your insight on this intersection. Recent imagery from 2025-04-21 appeared to show the intersection configured this way. I now see that construction tagging indicating a roundabout in this location dates back to 2021, and should have consulted with the community before making updates here. If recent construction has since altered the intersection, I’m happy to defer to your knowledge, and can restore the data to its previous state. Thank again, and have a nice day!
Buraddo (2025-08-07 08:19:47+00:00): Thanks for the response.
Construction should have started back in 2021, but it was postponed... However, now the progress is good, the north roundabout has been opened to traffic 1 month again and the southern one since last weekend. I'm regularly using this road so I am going to constantly update it.

I reverted your changeset in 170093204
dcskobuffs (2025-08-07 19:42:25+00:00): Thanks again for the information, and restoring the data. I appreciate you reaching out!
eggie (2025-08-04 20:31:26+00:00): Zou even de rendering in de gaten houden, want building=no leverder in het verleden ook gewoon een gebouw op in de rendering.
Die regel kun je beter weglaten. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-08-05 07:01:58+00:00): building=no heb ik verwijderd.
gr eggie
habi (2026-01-07 09:07:57+00:00): Ciao dafadllyn
Das Gebäude taucht im Katasterplan Bern auf, ich habe die Umrisse angepasst.
Ich nehme an, der Modulbau hat ein Flachdach, das habe ich so erfasst.
Weitere Details könntest du noch nachtragen, wenn du weisst, wie das Gebäude aussieht.
Gruss,
Habi

PS: Ich bin hier weil in `fixme`s rund um Bern anschaue (https://osm.li/Y4e)
habi (2026-01-07 09:32:32+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176935815
dafadllyn (2026-01-21 20:31:36+00:00): Tschou Habi
Sorry, habe deinen Kommentar erst jetzt gesehen.
Danke fürs Abarbeiten der fixme-Tags und fürs Einzeichnen des Schulprovisoriums.
Welchen Katasterplan Bern verwendest du? Wir haben doch nur den der Stadt Bern und des Kantons Neuchâtel. Oder ist das Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Switzerland/Datasources) nicht aktuell?
(Dass auf der amtlichen Vermessung der Stadt Bern praktisch der gesamte Kanton abgebildet war, ist ja schon lange nicht mehr der Fall.)
Lieben Gruss, Raphael
habi (2026-01-26 15:12:40+00:00): Saletti!

Ich brauche wms_endpoint:https://www.geoservice.apps.be.ch/geoservice3/services/a42geo/of_planningcadastre04_de_ms_wms/MapServer/WMSServer? in JOSM, da kann ich dann jeweilen die gewünschte Ebene auswählen.
Ich hab' den Link vor längerem mal bei https://opendata.swiss/ rausgeknübelt, sehe aber grad, dass das dort nicht mehr zu finden ist.
Ich finde "nur" https://opendata.swiss/de/dataset/amtliche-vermessung-vereinfacht

Weil ID glaub's kein WMS kann, hab' ich das damals nicht in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Editor_Layer_Index eingepflegt, sehe aber grad, dass das Layer auch in https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Maps/Switzerland fehlt.
habi (2026-01-26 15:20:58+00:00): Ich hatte mal eine Mailkommunikation mit dem 'Leiter GIS-Kompetenzzentrum'  der 'Geoinformation Stadt Bern', die ist hier zitiert: https://github.com/osmlab/editor-layer-index/commit/1c60aadbf9fdd085aa2ada9a97dd26144e3e5624 zum Katasterplan der *Stadt* Bern.
dafadllyn (2026-02-07 15:48:46+00:00): Danke für deine Antwort und den Link.

Der Katasterplan des Kantons Bern wäre hilfreich, um OSM zu verbessern. Ich zögere jedoch, ihn zu verwenden, weil wir dafür offenbar keine ausdrückliche Erlaubnis haben. (Opendata alleine genügt ja nicht. Der Herausgeber muss auch zustimmen, dass er lediglich auf https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributors erwähnt wird.)

Liebe Gruess u e schöne Sunnti
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-09-16 06:06:52+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1420049712/history - skąd to highway=proposed ?
janhals (2025-08-26 19:12:57+00:00): Eens ter plekke bij de De Bracke, Sint-Margriete gekeken. Het schuurtje, waar de grens door zou lopen, staat er augustus 2025 nog. 
Ook nog eens gekeken naar de grensbeschrijving van het jaar 1843, waarin het verloop van de grens exact is beschreven. Opvallend is, dat in de nu in OSM getekende grens op deze plaats t.o.v. 1843 knopen zijn toegevoegd, waardoor de grens door het schuurtje loopt. Haal je die toegevoegde knopen weg, dan loopt de grens (en daarmee ook de Liende) precies langs het schuurtje. Zijn deze knopen foutief toegevoegd? Als niemand een ander idee heeft, wil ik de toegevoegde knopen weghalen uit de getekende grens, waarmee het probleem van het kruisen opgelost zou zijn.
sykul (2025-08-08 13:56:30+00:00): Hello, Professor. Thanks for the contributions. I've noticed in this and your other contributions that you like to use name= to describe what the object is. 
This isn't necessary because there are lots of tags in OSM which describe exactly what the object is and what its features are. They are generally findable on the wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page

The name should be the actual name https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

Your contributions are still valuable, especially in an under-mapped country like China, and I don't want to discourage you. But using the correct tags is important to ensure the data is consistent and usable by third parties.
Thanks.
David White professor (2025-10-15 00:17:41+00:00): Thanks. I appreciated this comment and tried to stop using the "Name" field in the way you described. I make updates via Organic Maps, which limits the types of fields that one is allowed to enter. The upshot is that it can provide exact geo-coordinates. If you can recommend a better app for updating open street maps, I'm all ears (though, very slow to respond, unfortunately). Thanks!
Tomas Straupis (2025-08-10 07:25:24+00:00): O kodėl degalinė ir parduotuvė pažymėti kaip atskiri objektai (degalinė išvis pažymėta kaip stogas)? Juk tai VIENAS objektas. Kasos aparatas vienoje vietoje, tiek degalinės, tiek parduotuvės. Kai moki už kurą, moki ir už parduotuvės dalykus. Tai ir objektas tai VIENAS.
DodoGTA (2025-08-10 08:04:44+00:00): @Tomas Straupis Nes parduotuvė ir degalinė turi skirtingus darbo laikus (parduotuvė naktį nedirba, o galima naudoti degalinę visą parą su programėle)

O dėl stogo, galiu perkelti degalinę į atskirą tašką jei reikia
Tomas Straupis (2025-08-10 09:04:02+00:00): Tai vieta (keli metrai) nelabai svarbi, kai šnekam apie tokį objektą. Akei, jei darbo laikai skirtingi, tai gal ir yra priežastis atskiriems objektams :-) Sėkmės!
user_5359 (2025-08-05 15:35:59+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/414313466. Please notice: the key operator:1996 only refers to operator in year 1996. No statement before that (in which case operator:-1996 would be correct) or after that (in which case operator:1996- would be correct).
5m4u9 (2025-08-05 17:48:33+00:00): Hi, I totally forgot the character "-". Fixed.
silversurfer83 (2025-08-05 16:19:05+00:00): Danke :)

manchmal muss der Editor auch meckern ohne dass es geändert wird ;)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169976457
aceman444 (2026-06-23 21:48:29+00:00): Hi, what does cuisine=community_centre mean on these cafes you add? That does not seem like a type of cusine (what food is served).
Niquarl (2025-08-17 20:03:45+00:00): ok thanks
user_5359 (2025-08-05 15:04:37+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/13049033123. What is the mean of the tag Senderos = turísticos de Aragón ?
arte2002 (2025-08-05 20:19:53+00:00): Thanks for the note, corrected
felipeeugenio (2025-08-04 21:44:46+00:00): Hola Felipe. Las casas puedes cuadrarlas con la letra Q en ID.
Estas parecen hechas a pulso.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169977269
felipeeugenio (2025-08-04 21:44:54+00:00): Buen trabajo en la Reina en todo caso.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169977269
felipeacsi (2025-09-14 20:37:14+00:00): Hola Felipe, no noté este comentario, recién lo veo...
Gracias por la observación. siempre trato de cuadrarlas. A veces lo hacía al final de una edición y quizás quedaron sin cuadrar. Ahora trato de ir cuadrando una a una.
Saludos!
pwbriggs (2025-08-04 21:26:41+00:00): Intersections to check: Charles & Golf, 14th & Golf, and roundabouts at ex. 13th & Hill
Potatoleum (2025-08-04 22:20:11+00:00): I apologize, I didn't mean to make such a large changeset. i thought my josm client was making new changesets, but apparently it was not. oh well.
Negreheb (2025-08-05 05:52:05+00:00): Happens, don't worry :) (Thanks for using good changeset-comments! )
NorthCrab_upload (2025-08-04 21:41:37+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/908872754
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1014060099
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1017523523
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1420059714

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Barroszt (2025-08-04 22:13:29+00:00): poprawione
habi (2025-08-05 08:46:26+00:00): Ciao Claudio

Wie schon in https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4892633 geschrieben, bildet OpenStreetMap die gegenwärtige Realität 'on the ground' ab.
Dass hier mal eine Jugi war ist zwar interessant, aber eher für openhistoricalmap.org geeignet.

Gruss aus Bern,
Habi
user1572739 (2025-08-05 11:32:59+00:00): Hello,

it seems that you are misusing the "name" tag again. "1BR Central Apartment" or "Aesthetic new apartment" are obviously no names but descriptions. If there is no such name, the "name" tag must be left empty. You can specify, for example, the number of beds by using the "capacity" tag. "Central" is unnecessary as well since the data already contains the geographical coordinates.

For the case that you don't understand German (what the "_DE" in your display name suggested before you changed it), here is the English version of the same Wiki page about the "name" tag again:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
NorthCrab_upload (2025-08-04 22:21:00+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Wybudowanie pod Łąg":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/529568232
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/529568266
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/687203379
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/858931940
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1241189792

Pozdrawiam! 🦀