piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Monchinho (2023-09-18 14:51:15+00:00): Ola, monteagud! Moi boa apreciación sobre o tema dos lavadoiros. Quedou claro. Graciñas. Aproveito para cambiar o nome a "Fonte e Lavadoiro do Rubial", pois "Fontelavadoiro" como palabra non está no dicionario. Un saúdo.
Frans S (2023-09-19 09:25:00+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 
A remark on tagging highways. Don't tag a highway=track, when it gives access to buildings.


Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141400668
Frans S (2023-09-19 09:25:35+00:00): Please check this document to get your knowledge of how to map and tag highways up to date.
https://learnosm.org/en/coordination/remote-tracing/

For Marocco
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Morocco#How_tagging_the_routes/ways?

Tips 
Connect nodes of highways to each other to achieve a road network which can be used by satellite navigation systems. (these cannot deal with a gap between 2 pieces of roads)

Please focus on highways which connects isolated dwellings, hamlets, villages and bigger.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141400668
ediyes (2023-09-20 00:17:58+00:00): Hi Frans,

Thank you for your feedback; I will review it and improve my editions.
SomeoneElse (2023-09-17 23:33:23+00:00): Also ts0196a and ts0197b, Beningbrough
Monchinho (2023-09-18 14:49:35+00:00): Ola, monteagud. Que tal todo? Vexo que controlas da zona do Rubial. Este edificio, segundo Street View, é un hórreo. En OpenStreeMap o hórreo como tal está tipificado como "barn" ou graneiro. É unha etiqueta un pouco difusa, pero en principio os hórreos etiquétanse como graneiros, aínda que estean en desuso ou mesmo en ruínas. Un saúdo.
Frans S (2023-09-19 09:21:30+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
D: Connecting nodes of buildings to other buildings or features like roads and residential areas.
H: Incorporated the yard or a clearing into the mapping.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141400815
Frans S (2023-09-19 09:21:38+00:00): Hello again.  FYI
This is how to map a building with courtyards.

 1   Draw the outer outline of the building as an area. Tag as a building
 2  Draw each of the inner courtyards/plazas as areas. Tag as needed, or not at all
 3  Hold 'SHIFT' and select all the areas
 4  Press 'C' to create a multipolygon with all the areas
 Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141400815
JackNUMBER (2023-09-19 09:40:14+00:00): Hello, ok thank you. It is not what the instructions says... https://tasks.hotosm.org/projects/15475/tasks
Frans S (2023-09-19 11:37:51+00:00): You are right. But this is common practice when buildings will be mapped.
In this area, Buildings are often built as a compound with an open room in it.
Best regards
Frans S (2023-09-19 09:18:08+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
Please focus on buildings and roads. Walls and solar panels are not important and no part of the project.

When you draw a track to a river, don't connect it to that river but stop in front of it. Only when the road continues, map further and add a water crossing like a ford.
Please do not connect nodes of buildings to each other.
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141400937
Frans S (2023-09-19 09:12:02+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
A: E: Inaccurate mapped and / or not squared.
C: Collecting multiple buildings and mapping them as 1 building.
D: Connecting nodes of buildings to other buildings or features like roads and residential areas.
H: Incorporated the yard or a clearing into the mapping.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141401087
Frans S (2023-09-19 09:12:46+00:00): Hello again. 
This is how to map a building with courtyards.

 1   Draw the outer outline of the building as an area. Tag as a building
 2  Draw each of the inner courtyards/plazas as areas. Tag as needed, or not at all
 3  Hold 'SHIFT' and select all the areas
 4  Press 'C' to create a multipolygon with all the areas
 Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141401087
Langlaeufer (2023-09-19 09:43:13+00:00): Hallo mralexrass,

die Radwege in der Abelmannstr. sind meines Wissens nicht benutzungspflichtig. Deshalb ist bicycle=use_sidepath auf der Straße falsch.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141401443
LockOnGuy (2023-09-18 04:33:47+00:00): Hello ڕاستی, I see here you changed the name of n6757171185 from Arabic to Kurdish, While the building have an Arabic name on the sign see: https://i.ibb.co/vv8jhWd/image.png       
And their social media is all Arabic no Kurdish: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100090815451133     
May I know why did you change the name from Arabic to Kurdish while the place don't have a Kurdish name?        
Regards.
ڕاستی (2023-09-19 00:46:27+00:00): Are you sure this place does not any Kurdish name?
LockOnGuy (2023-09-19 00:50:23+00:00): Read the comment again.. 
anyways, I used the name from the picture I sent above as a ‘name’ as it’s the main name on the building’s sign..
citrula (2023-09-19 12:21:35+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You don't need to add oneway=no to streets which don't have a oneway tag. They are assumed to be two-way by default.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141401921
jmapb (2024-06-21 22:39:42+00:00): Thanks for adding this path: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1208651473

I just used it and saved a few minutes :)
ZeLonewolf (2023-09-18 18:07:36+00:00): Please explain this edit and how you came to assess that this street is accessible.
ZeLonewolf (2023-09-18 18:38:32+00:00): Additional discussion on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141402069
citrula (2023-09-19 12:22:02+00:00): You can press "Q" in iD in order to square the corners of things you draw :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141402011
ZeLonewolf (2023-09-18 18:13:16+00:00): Please explain how you came to determine that this road is accessible.  I personally surveyed it.
ZeLonewolf (2023-09-18 18:18:01+00:00): Also, Bing Maps Aerial is the wrong imagery layer for this area.  You should be using the March 2023 Rhode Island aerial imagery, which is the most up today.
ZeLonewolf (2023-09-18 18:33:14+00:00): Aside from above, the reason that I marked this area as access=no, is because it is currently scheduled for demolition, and it is surrounded by a tall chain link construction fence.  I trust that this explanation is sufficient and that I don't need to run out and gather more photographic evidence as I did on the other changesets on the island that I reverted.  I would appreciate in the future, if you would have a discussion when reverting recent edits if you are not personally putting your eyeballs on the thing you are changing. I live in this area and my edits are based on personally visiting these locations on the ground.
StreetSurveyor (2023-09-18 18:58:52+00:00): I have physically run these roads this year.
ZeLonewolf (2023-09-18 19:12:15+00:00): I surveyed this area on September 10th.  Here's my GPS trace:
https://www.strava.com/activities/9821831153
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-09-18 22:49:31+00:00): > 

I have physically run these roads this year.


then why you revert edits made based on survey performed later? See https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/19360810/history
TCduder (2023-09-18 01:26:20+00:00): Also added names, and relocated a couple that changed
okadatsuneo (2023-09-18 11:03:08+00:00): OSMにようこそ。
こんな感じでOKです。
道路の交点の「highway=crossing」タグは横断歩道で使いますので、このような道路の交差点では不要です。
Teselapfer (2023-09-18 11:31:02+00:00): ありがとうございます。
理解しました。
今後もこのあたりの編集をしていきたいと思うので、都度指摘があればよろしくお願いします。
okadatsuneo (2023-09-18 13:04:20+00:00): あと、Bingの航空写真には座標ずれがあったり、道路がゆがんでいることがままあります。
位置座標については地理院のシームレス写真に合わせることをおすすめします。(ただし写真が古い場合はあるのですが)
Teselapfer (2023-09-19 00:52:12+00:00): なるほど...
ありがとうございます。
Teselapfer (2023-09-19 01:00:16+00:00): 確認したのですが、おそらく10年ほど前の写真となっています。
周辺で複数道路工事があったことや現在ある家が数件ないことなどから確証はありますが、このまま地理院のシームレス写真に合わせたほうがいいでしょうか。
okadatsuneo (2023-09-19 03:01:41+00:00): 航空写真の違いで道路があったりなかったりする部分もあると思いますが、変わっていない部分(道路・建物)もあると思います。その変わっていない部分は国土地理院のものを参考にするという感じです。
まぁそんな厳密なものでもないので、こんなものかな？くらいで良いですよ。
編集するうちに、複数の航空写真を見比べてくると「あれ？」と違いがわかってくると思います。
Teselapfer (2023-09-19 23:36:03+00:00): そういうことでしたか、わかりました。
cpanw (2023-09-18 01:56:10+00:00): source: https://gismaps.kingcounty.gov/iMap/
BCNorwich (2023-09-18 06:03:35+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Thanks for adding the public defibrillator. Is it actually inside the building as placed on the map? If it's outside (as I would think) is it attached to the building wall? The information in your changeset comment above will not be available on a rendered map. So this info should be placed on the POI tags. Please see here for help tagging defibrillators: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:emergency%3Ddefibrillator

Need help please just ask.
Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2023-09-19 07:52:43+00:00): Hi, Thanks, I see you've made an amendment. It's OSM practice to continue the comments here, rather than on another changeset which would not normally have been noticed.

Anyway on Changeset: 141445069 you ask for feedback. 

OK, the general access would be yes rather than permissive because it is in an open area with presumed access for the public.

Being situated outside you should not tick the box "Located inside a building".

Situated outside as it is and always accessible then opening_hours=24/7 is tagged.

Lastly, the POI should be joined to the wall.

I've made the amendments but please check that all I've stated is correct. I'm not local but am assuming my points from your comments.

Regards Bernard.
phoenixsaigon1698 (2023-09-27 13:06:57+00:00): Relation 15583803 is missing "via" member. Please check again. Thank you.
citrula (2023-09-19 12:25:17+00:00): Hi scotttie, you need to add the appropriate highway tag to this way. I'm not familiar with this trail so I will leave it up to you to determine which one is appropriate (footway/path)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141403432
MxxCon (2023-09-20 01:35:39+00:00): Since you are editing a lot of POIs, consider checking out EveryDoor app. It's for both Android and iOS. It was designed specifically for mapping of POIs(and it can do a few other things too).👍
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141403922
oba510 (2023-09-18 04:31:17+00:00): Hi Alee11,

The campus has already been mapped at a much higher level of accuracy/detail than what you added. Unfortunately I had to revert your changeset. I would encourage you to look at what has already been mapped and add details to the existing data rather than trying to draw on top of it.
Dimitar155 (2023-09-18 13:17:41+00:00): 'Привет Венци,

Не е нужно да дублираш информацията за височината на върха. Тя е въведена веднъж в ele тага и се показва на картата под името. Геодезическата точка е хубаво да остане, освен ако не е била премахната или разрушена поради някаква причина.

Оставам на разположение, ако имаш някакви въпроси.

Поздрави,
Митко'

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141424920
cpanw (2023-09-18 04:34:03+00:00): source: https://gismaps.kingcounty.gov/iMap/
phoenixsaigon1698 (2023-09-26 08:40:47+00:00): Em ơi, time-based turn restriction thì đừng để  thêm giá trị permanent vào nhé.
felipeeugenio (2023-09-20 14:29:00+00:00): Hola
Borró una escuela entera, verdedas e interpolaciones. Es porque ya no existen o se trata de un error?
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141406679
citrula (2023-09-19 12:18:33+00:00): Welcome to OSM!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141406699
Tayvick (2023-09-19 05:09:20+00:00): in Mossyrock, WA*
user_5359 (2023-09-19 16:26:11+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1208697190.
What is the mean of the tags
    county = Kakamega
    cuid = BjC1xL40gHo
    gid = 1684
    pop2009 = 30584.0
    scuid = ssbO49f0iLN
    subcounty = Matungu Sub County
    uid = PXAviuGXJGl
    ward = Mayoni Ward
Please have a look on https://wiki.osm.org for the correct notation of population (my assumption)
Taya_S (2023-09-18 13:33:20+00:00): reverted due to vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141425629
CurlingMan13 (2023-09-19 18:25:48+00:00): "Private" driveways should not be deleted.  Access tags should be used instead.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141409297
NastassiaKalesnikava (2023-09-20 07:12:24+00:00): Hi! Thank you for the comment and the revert previous driveway.
SpinOff (2023-12-31 19:52:10+00:00): Cześć. Skąd pomysł na dodawanie tagów na liniach tworzących obrys diecezji/parafii? Mam na myśli np. tę linię: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1128329513

Zawiera ona tagi które są już przyporządkowane do relacji, przez co się dublują.
WieKo68 (2024-06-10 20:33:28+00:00): Są to tagi pomocnicze do tworzenia linii granic parafii. Po zakończeniu i korektach zostaną usunięte
user_5359 (2023-09-19 16:11:24+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1205727034. What is the mean of the tags
areatype = 10
contour = depth
contourarea = depth
quantenschaum (2023-09-19 19:00:32+00:00): Hi, this is experimental stuff. I tried to draw depth contour lines to get them displayed in https://osmand.net/, has to do with https://github.com/quantenschaum/mapping/blob/master/DEPTH.md. It can be removed, if it is problem.
user_5359 (2023-09-20 19:21:09+00:00): Hello! It is not about the data but about the way the keys are written. As far as I know, there was once a project that used measuring devices to collect water depths in the sea. Perhaps you could ask there how these values can be entered in a meaningful way. See https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/OpenSeaMap#History_and_fundamentals
Piagno (2023-09-18 07:30:35+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3893095
as well
zstadler (2024-05-27 20:54:33+00:00): שלום Compositor,

תודה על תרומתך למיפוי

בעריכה זו מלפני כ-8 חודשים מחקת את תגית
wikidata
והוספת תגית
wikipedia
אין סתירה בין התגיות האלו ורצוי לא למחוק אחת כשמוסיפים את השניה

בנוסף, בתגית
wikipedia
הכנסת קישור ולא את כותרת הדף.

אתה מוזמן להסתכל בתיקונים שביצעתי בנקודה
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7807338796

בברכה,
זאב
Kees 59 (2026-04-08 12:57:55+00:00): It is a bit late but https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/945567286 'material=20 mph'?
Pink Duck (2026-04-08 13:02:31+00:00): Thanks for pointing that out. Have corrected the tagging.
Friendly_Ghost (2023-09-18 17:59:32+00:00): Hi Pan. Why do you map individual trees as natural=wood?
Pan (2023-09-19 21:31:42+00:00): It is impossible to me to see if they are individual trees or not according to the imagery. So, I don't know.
Friendly_Ghost (2023-09-19 21:58:30+00:00): If you can't distinguish individual trees, perhaps this area can be better mapped as a single natural=wood polygon rather than circular wood areas around individual trees or tiny clusters of trees.
Pan (2023-09-19 23:18:38+00:00): It would would be less time consuming but less accurate. An other possible solution would be to reconsider the "low density" forest tag discussed on the forum. Given the accuracy of the Swiss Surface Layer however, this way is the most ground truth compliant.
Friendly_Ghost (2023-09-21 12:04:19+00:00): I took a moment to verify what you said (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141555620), and it's absolutely not true that your method is more accurate. You're just using the Lidar data to draw arbitrary circles around individual trees that should instead be mapped as nodes. You're just filling OSM with a load of redundant ways. 

Also, why does https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3238626 have thousands of nodes that are in a straight line between the previous and next node? That should really be simplified.
Pan (2023-09-21 13:03:18+00:00): This is simply not the case, nothing is arbitrary and you have vandalized the data.
woodpeck (2023-09-21 14:18:38+00:00): Pan, could you explain the technical process you used to create https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3238626 - surely this was not manually traced?
woodpeck (2023-09-21 14:32:21+00:00): Previous discussion in Swiss community where it was pointed out that something with one node per metre is not necessarily more "precise" http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/archives/list/talk-ch@openstreetmap.ch/thread/MDNT4XCPD76OAUTMNBPFLN55KZS6FYBY/
BunnyFluff (2023-09-18 07:45:10+00:00): Tested and working with the following using the car setting:
Valhalla
FOSSGIS routing (osrm-backend)
GraphHopper routing engine
BCNorwich (2023-09-18 11:50:00+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I notice that you've removed the building outline, has it been demolished?  If not, and it's only the company that's no longer there, then the building and its address should remain. The company name and amenity should be tagged as disused so that other folk can see the disused information and not mistakenly re-map it.

Regards Bernard.
JMs11!!! (2023-09-18 15:11:37+00:00): Hi Bernard, 
Thanks for the message. The building is there but we cannot have the name of the building or information freely available, please could you confirm this has been removed?
Many thanks, 
Jamie 
SJOG Hospitaller Services.
mueschel (2023-09-21 09:19:57+00:00): Could you check these ways, "difficult_alpine_hiking" is not a common tag.
RaphaelPasloin (2023-09-18 09:27:11+00:00): Hello,

Where this "Mountainbike" came from ? I'm little surpirse because the Parc is protected and access on this part is forbitten for bicycle : 

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=7715844891821116

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=813807902949128
Bear-in-a-box (2023-09-18 10:17:39+00:00): Hello,
I don't know where it comes from but it is there. seen it yesterday and looks like it was a lot of digging and shaping work. 
Access is not forbidden via the old Tramwaylane. Not sure how old the mapillary pictures are but access to the part of the bike parc is certainly not forbidden. Otherwise this huge work would have not been undertaken
RaphaelPasloin (2023-09-20 04:12:34+00:00): Hello,

Thank's for your reply. I have surveyed the place yesterday , and the C11 are still present. (as repeated signal because you have C3 on all main entrances.

It's true that from Promenade du Chemin de fer there's no more signs (but the pole is still present , look's like was vandalised) : https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=617947203875184

But in the Règlement de police concernant l'usage et l'occupation des parcs, espaces verts et
aires de jeux situés sur le domaine public de la commune de Woluwe-Saint-Lambert on Article 6.2 it's stipulate that it's not allowed : 6.2 circuler à bicyclette, trottinette, planches à roulettes, patins à roulettes etc... en dehors
des pistes cyclables, des chemins et des sentiers en dur. 

The area and the ground path there are not "sentiers en dur". It's also stipulate on the "Règlement général de Police : "Article 82
Les véhicules non motorisés, les cycles, les trottinettes, les planches à roulettes, les skis à roulettes, et
les patins à roulettes sont interdits dans les espaces verts à l'exception des voitures d'enfants et de
personnes moins valides, ainsi que des cycles conduits par des enfants de moins de 11 ans et dans la
mesure où leur conduite ne met pas en danger la sécurité des autres usagers.
Les cycles, les trottinettes, les planches à roulettes et les patins à roulettes peuvent être utilisés aux
endroits spécifiquement destinés à cet effet. 

There is no indincation that it's a mtb park and not stipulated that cycling is allowed there. 

I understand that the place is used in fact but that's don't make it a playground and cycleway inside. (btw mtb mapping use track or path not cycleway) I suggest to use disused:highway=path with access=no for the ways and the prefix not: for the area.  With leaving a note to prevent other mapper to redraw (better to not delete it). 

Have a good day.
Bear-in-a-box (2023-09-20 07:42:46+00:00): Thanks for checking on the spot and the legal texts. 
Even if civil servants want to forbid everything (especially cycling) in this city, this does not change the fact that this place is real, it exists, it is maintained and it is used.

Reality goes beyond formalistic legal texts that are made by grey civil servants in their offices. Reality is on the ground and this should be reflected in the map.

There is no fence that would obstruct access. People are not interested in boring legal texts. People are interested in reality and that's what this place is.

Nobody could argue that it does not exsit.
Nobody could argue that it is not used by bikers.
Nobody could argue that it is not maintained by somebody.

...and who could tell that even if these ridiculous C11 or C3 signs are there, maybe the users push their bikes to this nice little leisure ground and then start riding there? or maybe entre from the Spoorwegwandeling? It is not visibly forbidden from there.

We should not give in to civil servants trying to forbid everything. This is a free country, no? (even if most things are forbidden and only boring things allowed)...

Have a good day.