piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
skorpion62 (2024-09-26 08:52:15+00:00): Hallo NGL-engel,
Du hast geschrieben: „Hallo skorpion62,
wie ich schon geschrieben habe, mappen wir, was da ist, und nicht, was auf Papier steht.“
Das versuche ich Dir ja schon die ganze Zeit zu erklären, leider willst Du es nicht verstehen.
Denn dort ist keine Beschilderung für einen öffentlichen Parkplatz.
Du schreibst: „Ich habe mit der Stadt Löningen telefoniert. Man sagte mir, dass man dort natürlich parken dürfe, auch wenn es laut deinen Nachforschungen anscheint kein offizieller Parkplatz ist.“
Genau das habe ich Dir schon mehrfach geschrieben.
Meine Information kommt auch von der Stadt Löningen, sogar als e-Mail.
 Um dort zu Parken, braucht es keine Beschilderung für einen öffentlichen Parkplatz. An jedem Weg oder Straße kann man parken, es sei denn, dass es dort verboten ist. Da Du wieder einen öffentlichen Parkplatz eingetragen hat, ist das eine Falscheintragung.
Du schreibst: „Es tut mir sehr leid, wenn wir uns da wohl nicht einigen können. Aber da Du von einer dritte, unabhängige Meinung nichts hältst, kann ich es auch nicht ändern.“
Für mich ist die Situation klar. 
Wenn Du mit der Situation nicht klar kommst, warum stellst Du dann diese Frage nicht mal ins Forum. 
Viele Grüße
skorpion62
Gregory Peony (2024-10-26 03:34:52+00:00): I'm going to base this comment mostly on bing imagery becuase it appears that you used that imagery exclusively to map this. Some of the buildings you added added here are very well traced, and you managed to accurately trace some more complex shapes which is not the easiest thing to do in ID editor, for example WAY: 1317009744.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156886199
Gregory Peony (2024-10-26 03:34:58+00:00): Not all of the buildings you added have been appropriately squared and some are invalid, because they are definitely no longer present in more recent (ESRI) imagery. The cluster of 3 buildings next to WAY: 1317009758 is an example of this. I have deleted these footprints because they represent a feature that no longer exists, more may also need to be deleted. Please remeber to take care when using imagery sources other than the primary source when contributing. Check the primary source to see if a feature is still present, or if you may have missed features that are visible in the primary source, before uploading (saving your work) . Thank you for your conribution!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156886199
berndw (2024-10-06 16:58:22+00:00): Hi

Grundsätzlich war recycling=glass hier korrekt, da nicht nur Glasflaschen recycled werden sondern allgemein Glas.

Ist halt jetzt doppelt gemoppelt
Gregory Peony (2024-10-27 03:58:13+00:00): These building footprints are inaccurate. The accuracy of your mapping is important for those using the map and the data. A lot of these buildings are oversized and may skew population estimates. The accurate shape of buildings is important for identification. Would you be able to tell which building was which if you were using a map in this area? Thank you for your contribution. I encourage you to attend a mapathon. check https://osmcal.org/ to find one.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156886301
Gregory Peony (2024-10-31 00:12:54+00:00): Welcome to OSM. The areas you add represent building footprints and so should represent individual buildings; not groups of them. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156886486
Yukiro (2024-09-21 17:38:40+00:00): Hi, I have noticed you added some buildings, that's good, but there is no need to name them.
Sammyhawkrad (2024-09-24 07:49:43+00:00): Hello EkowYaw, the footpaths you added cross other roads and intersect buildings. This is not ideal. I'm fixing these, but next time connect highways when they intersect and avoid connecting highways to buildings. 

Regards,
Sam
itineris (2024-12-23 10:41:17+00:00): Hi,

Please don't do it! Bing is not aligned properly. In Hungary, FÖMI imagery is used as a georeference. You've made this road worse.

Thank you,
Ákos
ArchibaldFickleKazam (2024-12-23 13:31:09+00:00): I cycle this road on a regular basis, and my Garmin using OSM loses the road at this point, so needed fixing. The road is clearly misaligned at just this part. Other roads in the area do align to the base imagery
itineris (2024-12-23 13:40:49+00:00): Nope. Your Garmin's GPS is inaccurate, most probably due to leaf coverage and only partial view to the sky. It's quite a common phenomenon to have an offset GNSS position when half of the sky is covered by hillsides.

Believe me, the road is surveyed properly by Magyar Közút (Hungarian Public Roads), using RTK receivers for sub-meter accuracy.

Thank you.
CurlingMan13 (2024-09-25 23:07:21+00:00): Do not partially overlap areas (Ex:  fairways partially overlapping a green)
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156886744
Gregory Peony (2024-10-24 20:49:04+00:00): Well done, all of the features that you added are in fact buildings. Their shape however, is generally not accurate; all of these building footprints are actually recti-linear, and so should have square corners (press q on the keyboard after accurately tracing). To be fair the imagery you used to digitize the footprints does not have the greatest resolution. If you choose to contine contributing I recommend that you find a project with clearer imagery to gain familiarity with building shapes.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156886751
Gregory Peony (2024-10-24 21:00:52+00:00): Thank you for your contribution. You correctly identified the vast majority if not all of the buildings that you digitized in this changeset. Their shape however is not very accurate and a number of features overlap and share nodes. Refer to the editing shortcuts in the help section of the ID editor for 'squaring' and 'avoiding cursor snapping'.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156886825
Herwescheluc (2024-09-25 09:22:11+00:00): Revert wegen Missachtung elementarer Grundsätze zum Thema Massen-Edit (100+ Häuser in 30 Minuten) mit Import-Tools (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Microsoft_Building_Footprint_Data) und extrem ungenauer Erfassung aufgrund unpassender Luftbildverwendung.
---
Revert for disregarding elementary principles of mass editing (100+ houses in 30 minutes) with import tools (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Microsoft_Building_Footprint_Data) and extremely inaccurate recording due to inappropriate use of aerial images.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157072239
rskedgell (2024-09-20 21:47:45+00:00): Thanks for adding these crossings. In the UK, a crossing marked with dots and adjacent to a highway=traffic_signals node should be tagged as crossing=traffic_signals.

With appropriate tagging on these crossings, users of apps like StreetComplete will be able to check for accessibility features like sound and tactile signals.
Kurtographer (2024-09-20 22:15:32+00:00): Thank you for the feedback! I will update these and keep that in mind for the future!
Herwescheluc (2024-10-07 08:02:25+00:00): Hallo, Daneel76!
Du hast im Walbergraben und in der Europastraße die Geschwindigkeit auf 30 gesenkt. Noch steht da (teilweise) maxspeed:type=DE:urban.
Ist da jetzt maxspeed:type= (und  zusätzlich source:maxspeed=) DE:zone30 oder sign?
Gruß aus Herborn
Andreas
eggie (2024-09-21 05:32:32+00:00): Kryztov,
Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback Deze straatnaam Christod de Vrieslaan  kan ik niet vinden in de BGT/Kadaster.
Welke bron heb je gebruikt?


MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-09-21 05:38:50+00:00): Straatnaam verwijderd.
Je kunt evt een terugmelding doen bij de BGT/ Kadaster.
https://www.verbeterdekaart.nl/#?geometry.x=260722.67&geometry.y=577689.52&zoomlevel=13.98

Andere kaarten kun je niet zomaar als bron gebruiken.
MVG
eggie
Herwescheluc (2024-09-25 09:22:12+00:00): Revert wegen Missachtung elementarer Grundsätze zum Thema Massen-Edit (100+ Häuser in 30 Minuten) mit Import-Tools (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Microsoft_Building_Footprint_Data) und extrem ungenauer Erfassung aufgrund unpassender Luftbildverwendung.
---
Revert for disregarding elementary principles of mass editing (100+ houses in 30 minutes) with import tools (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Microsoft_Building_Footprint_Data) and extremely inaccurate recording due to inappropriate use of aerial images.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157072239
eggie (2024-09-21 06:11:48+00:00): Dag wootje.. Je hebt hier twee cafe's toegevoegd op hetzelfde adres. . Eén zonder naam?

MVG
eggie
Hufkratzer (2024-09-21 18:35:53+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1317023397 ist zu klein für eine Reitanlage (im Sinne von https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure=horse_riding); sieht nach einem Round-Pen/Longierzirkel aus. Diese werden in OSM normalerweise wie Reitplätze getaggt, Beispiel: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/313659429
ivanbranco (2024-09-21 09:14:34+00:00): Ciao maikol,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1317027443

qua hai mappato l'elemento come natural=reef, che secondo la wiki é "una roccia, una secca di sabbia o un'altra formazione (come coralli, stromatoliti...) che si trova permanentemente sotto la superficie dell'acqua, ma vicino alla superficie (per permanentemente si intende durante la bassa marea per i mari)."

Non mi sembra plausibile che tutta quella porzione di terreno sia "permanentemente sotto la superficie dell'acqua"

Stesso discorso per: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12189079045

in questo caso aggiungo:
1. il nome sembra descrittivo, name=* andrebbe utilizzato solo per nomi propri
2. l'isolotto era giá mappato come area natural=islet: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/54188975/history
la regola é "Una caratteristica fisica, un elemento su OSM", vedi: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:One_feature,_one_OSM_element
Carto'Cité (2024-11-12 14:43:11+00:00): Bonjour 
Il y avait une bande cyclables de type coronapiste de décrite ici 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/14193282
Elle était encore là sur les ortho de l'IGN en 2023 a priori ( https://data.geopf.fr/wmts?SERVICE=WMTS&REQUEST=GetTile&VERSION=1.0.0&LAYER=HR.ORTHOIMAGERY.ORTHOPHOTOS&STYLE=normal&FORMAT=image%2Fjpeg&TILEMATRIXSET=PM_6_19&TILEMATRIX=19&TILEROW=180200&TILECOL=265601)
Est-ce que tu peux me confirmer qu'elle a bien été transformée en piste ? 
Charles de Carto’Cité #CartoVeloIdF
lakedistrict (2024-09-21 17:28:42+00:00): Hi, thanks for your detailed edits and updates here. If the building was previously and purposely built as a hotel, then please use building=hotel and building:use=dormitory https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:use
felipeeugenio (2024-09-21 12:08:34+00:00): Hola. 
No hay un puente en Carlos Swett para pasar por el estero Pelamote?
parerce que si, pero le puso ford=yes, que es como que fuera un vado.
saludos
Baloo Uriza (2024-09-30 14:53:00+00:00): This is definitely concrete.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156891888
NeisBot (2024-09-21 00:34:38+00:00): Hi Angelacri, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 86% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 38 building(s)
- 1 natural(s)
- 38 landuse(')

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=156891966
pitscheplatsch (2024-09-24 05:47:05+00:00): Ok, some contributors have added buildings, while others have occasionally removed them at a later time.
Frans S (2024-09-26 14:08:27+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 
However, don't cluster buildings. If they span multiple plots, they have to be mapped as individual buildings.
Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156892296
KiloThree (2024-09-21 01:28:48+00:00): There is substantial benefit to tagging name on separately mapped cycleways or including them in named relations. As more and more bike lanes in the area have been mapped as separate cycleways, tools for routing have increasingly been unable to provide the name of the street, which has been degrading the utility of the map
andriu44 (2024-09-21 01:52:30+00:00): I see the need - I'm struggling to reconcile this with the general direction on the Names part of the OSM wiki, however. The roadway, sidewalk, and separate bike lanes are all part of the same object even if mapped separately. I believe they are all still linked by relation, which seems appropriate. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names
andriu44 (2024-09-21 01:54:18+00:00): Also, I don't see any documentation that the Paul Dudley White path travells with the Charles River Dam Road. The only documentation I've seen have the PDW as the DCR paths that travel in parallel to the River except at Eliot Bridge.
andriu44 (2024-09-21 01:55:09+00:00): (Not Eliot Bridge, sorry! -- Galen St bridge in Watertown).
KiloThree (2024-09-21 02:39:16+00:00): A lot of these don't appear to be in relations, and the one that I found, https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11580889 does not include the bikeway, the pavement on the other side, or a name
cubbe8 (2024-09-21 04:20:24+00:00): I have corrected the relations in the following changeset. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156894880#map=14/42.37814/-71.08742
Jakesname (2024-09-21 01:25:42+00:00): *wrong changeset description, updated NMP, not NMG
Layft Greater (2024-09-21 07:32:14+00:00): See discussion on changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156818308
nevw (2024-09-21 10:49:44+00:00): Hi, the multipolygons here are invalid.
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=144.98697&lat=-37.92507&zoom=17
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon
nevw (2024-09-22 21:37:10+00:00): fixed now. Multipolygons are more useful for getting rid of overlapping ways.
Another_Mapper_ (2024-09-23 01:00:39+00:00): Thanks for catching and fixing that nevw. I appreciate the hint!
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-28 12:41:55+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1317046882/history has 동 = 102동 that was added in this edit
What is the meaning of this unusual key? Is this tag needed?
Or maybe can it be expressed in a more typical way that would be easier to understand?
Or maybe this key can and should be documented as useful tagging schema?
radgoat (2025-11-29 14:17:09+00:00): Thanks for the question! The key 동 is simply the Korean word for “building number” or “block number” used inside an apartment complex (for example: 101동, 102동…). It is my mistake.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-03 09:02:29+00:00): thanks for a fix!
ferog_v (2024-09-22 21:39:39+00:00): Buen día Ferrocarriles de México, por favor revierta esta vía a primaria ya que  no pertenece a los ejes de transporte.
Que según la Wiki de OSM https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Mexico/Red_Nacional_de_Caminos#Clasificaci%C3%B3n_de_la_Red_Nacional_de_Caminos_[3][4]
Solo las que pertenecen a los ejes de transporte deberán ser clasificadas como troncales.
ferog_v (2024-09-22 20:37:59+00:00): Por favor no cambie la jerarquía de caminos al azar. Lea las normas de etiquetado en la wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Mexico/Red_Nacional_de_Caminos

En el artículo anterior puede encontrar la sección Relaciones para caminos donde indica como se debe etiquetar una relación y los caminos que estén en ella.

Más abajo puede encontrar el Índice de Carreteras y sus respectivos Datos Viales por Estado donde puede ver el nombre de cada tramo carretero, su extensión y el nombre de la ruta.

Su changeset:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156893968 altera el nombre de las vías a uno incorrecto, elimina la relación carretera y modifica clasificación de carreteras incorrectamente.

Para asistir con las rutas troncales ya que la imagen que proporciona la wiki de OSM no es precisa puede usted revisar http://datosviales2020.routedev.mx/main en mapas temáticos y revisar las carreteras que conforman el eje de transporte, esta es una fuente oficial del gobierno federal así mismo está el siguiente enlace http://rnc.imt.mx/# que puede consultar para mayor precisión (visual) en cuanto a donde empiezan y terminan los tramos de carretera.
felipeeugenio (2024-09-21 12:09:09+00:00): Hola. por favor no usar contracciones. Escribir pasaje entero. No psje.
Saludos
Veteraharv (2024-09-21 03:36:50+00:00): RELATED POST:
https://www.skyscrapercity.com/threads/tagaytay-fora-tagaytay-5t-mix.1741989/page-4?post_id=190030004#post-190030004

(iykyk)
ivanbranco (2024-09-21 09:19:30+00:00): Ciao maikol,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1317051829/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1317051826
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1317051827
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1317051831
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1317051825
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1317051830

qualcosa deve essere andato storto, queste way sono rimaste senza tag
ivanbranco (2024-09-21 09:20:49+00:00): I nodi per gli attraversamenti dovrebbero avere un nodo in comune con la strada
ivanbranco (2024-09-21 09:22:39+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/362255857/history

era corretto prima, "L'etichetta leisure=swimming_pool dovrebbe essere usata solamente per la parte della piscina bagnata dall'acqua"

se hai dei dubbi sui tag consulta sempre la wiki prima: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Tag:leisure%3Dswimming_pool
thetornado76 (2024-12-17 13:46:48+00:00): I have corrected it back to sports_centre
KiloThree (2024-09-21 05:02:06+00:00): Why did you use a cycleway oneway tag on western Washington St and a few other places?

Also: The Somerville Ave cycletrack is complete from Mansfield to Union Sq

It looks like you marked parking:no on Otis St?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156894880
cubbe8 (2024-09-21 05:47:53+00:00): The cycleway oneway tag and Otis is my mistake, I will correct this. I did not remove the cycle track on Somerville Ave from Mansfield to Union Square, it is still present.
andriu44 (2024-09-23 14:42:57+00:00): The short section of cycle track on Charlestown Avenue doesn't enter the intersection - it ends just before the Green Line viaduct and turns into a shared-use path.
cubbe8 (2024-09-23 15:24:26+00:00): Ah, assumed it did
andriu44 (2024-09-23 16:24:22+00:00): Understandable - I think I changed it last week to reflect that but did you undo that change?
andriu44 (2024-10-02 14:58:57+00:00): Note The Washington Street 'cycle tracks' are not complete and will not be for a while yet -- Union Square/Webster to Beacon should not have any tags showing cycletracks.
ivanbranco (2024-09-21 10:21:56+00:00): You added many undocumented tags in this changeset...

Also, if is a festival, I guess is a temporary event? We do not map temporary events on OSM: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_map_temporary_events_and_temporary_features
KelsonV (2024-09-21 05:01:01+00:00): I'm not sure I tagged the circles and dome correctly, especially since they don't contain usable space so building:levels may not be the best way to convey the relative heights.

In the source field, I've linked to a photo of the whole building that I took from the parking lot (at cloud.hyperborea.org), and to the city's public art web page (at cerritos.gov) which has a view of just the dome and spire.
woodpeck_repair (2024-12-02 23:53:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 159862440, 159862427, 159862512, 159862481, 159862457, 159862433 where the changeset comment is: revert roblox_gmx edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16954
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-05 07:29:29+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/199829453/history has name = (fixme) that was added in this edit
Is it really named (fixme)? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:fixme
batcave (2024-09-23 10:59:26+00:00): Bonjour, je modifie actuellement la classification de toute les route national en primaire. Mais je vois que vous n'est pas d'accord.. J'ai tenté de justifier ces reclassifications ici : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR_talk:Madagascar_tagging_guidelines . Mais vous, qui est du pays, pourriez vous me donner vos arguments, pour que je comprenne un peu mieux la situation. Merci d'avance pour votre réponse.
Privatemajory (2024-09-23 12:19:08+00:00): Salut,
La section https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Madagascar_tagging_guidelines#R%C3%A9seau_routier a été adaptée à partir de https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Highway_Tag_Africa -- Ce qui est à retenir est l'importance d'avoir un réseau bien hiérarchisé par la dimension socio-économique.

- highway=primary devrait correspondre aux "principaux axes qui connectent les grandes villes." - ces grandes villes seraient à Madagascar les place=city (Antananarivo, Toamasina, Antsirabe, Mahajanga, Fianarantsoa, Toliara, Antsiranana, Fort-Dauphin). A l'exception de Fort-Dauphin (RNS 13), le réseau qui connecte ces villes est celui des routes nationales primaires (RNP 2, 4, 6, 7)

- highway=secondary devrait correspondre aux "routes qui permettent de rejoindre les capitales régionales et les villes assez importantes", la majorité des RNS tomberait dans cette catégorie (RNS 1 et 1b vers les régions Itasy, Bongolava et Melaky, RNS 5 vers les régions Analanjirofo et Ambatosoa, RNS 5a vers la région SAVA, RNS 12 vers les régions Fitovinany et Atsimo Atsinanana...)

- Etc.

Le gouvernement semble avoir tenu compte de l'importance de ces routes nationales en les classifiant en RNP, RNS, RNT et ces classifications reflètent la dimension de l'arrière pays qui en dépend. (https://web.archive.org/web/20191101121011/http://www.arm.mg/arm/textes_et_lois/classement_routes/Decret_99-776.pdf)

Qu'en pensez-vous?
FvGordon (2024-09-23 09:37:29+00:00): With this changeset you have uploaded a lot of duplicate buildings. Can you please remove the duplicate ones?
Pieter Vander Vennet (2024-09-23 09:52:26+00:00): I'll revert it later today (unless you revert it first)
Warin61 (2024-09-21 23:37:50+00:00): Hi,
The multipolygone relation is not correct - shared segments. 
See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.25924&lat=-35.29263&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Personally I'd not tag this area as all trees - some of it is grass .... I'd tag some as tree row..