piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Gregory Peony (2025-08-09 01:30:59+00:00): Again these are not isolated dwellings. In this case I decided to delete some of the place nodes and modified another to a value of hamlet to represent them all. See how I mapped this in https://osmcha.org/changesets/170180665 --- Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170076597
Supaplex (2025-08-07 05:14:43+00:00): Hi, 

Please map things that exist in reality. We will roll back your edits.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170087129
eggie (2025-08-06 20:24:54+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  Dit heet een impossible oneway.. Hoe wil je hier ooit inkomen?
In deze changeset heb je de highwaytag verwijderd. 
Denk dat de turningloop er ook niet hoort op een node. Elk begin is moeilijk. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
AndreaDp271 (2025-08-07 07:26:57+00:00): Thank you for your contribution but try to make smaller changeset areas. 😉http://osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170076780
Gregory Peony (2025-08-09 00:29:32+00:00): I agree with your decision to not include the buildings in the SW in the residential area mapped here, but they by definition do not constitute an isolated dwelling becuase they are only ~60 m from a settlement. Likely they are a part of the same settlement or perhaps a farmyard or something like that. If you want to add buildings that don't warrant a resiential area I recommend just mapping their footprints. I deleted the isolated dwelling in Changeset: 170179919. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170076858
Gregory Peony (2025-08-08 20:10:10+00:00): A valid residential area. Personally I include the yards and likely residential land within residential  areas; not just the buildings. You can see my interpretation in https://osmcha.org/changesets/170174027 --- Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170076887
eggie (2025-08-06 20:27:02+00:00): Oke, maar dar hoef je niet aan te geven op een node. 
Adresnode 43 heb je ergens anders heen gesleept. Het lijkt zo simpel, maar dat is het in het begin zeker niet.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-08-06 20:31:03+00:00): Een cutting=yes is bv zo'n ingang naar een tunne waar de weg onder het maaiveld loopt.
Verkeersborden met max 20 zie je nauwelijks. Klopt dat wel? De weg door de wijk lijkt me een highway=residential en niet een toegangsweg naar bv een parkeerplaats of benzinestation.
Dus highway=residential.
oneway=yes alleen op de lus.
Is er een uitzondering voor tweewielers op oneway?
Weg splitsen en en stuk naar de Hoofdstraat ontdoen van oneway=yes.
Gr eggie
eggie (2025-08-06 20:44:16+00:00): Ik heb de eenrichting laatste stuk verwijderd. Nu routeert het weer. 
Die node met die lusgegevens heb ik verwijderd. Het adres weer teruggeplaatst. Denk dat het zo weer klopt. 

MVG
eggie
Peter Vossen (2025-08-08 11:44:25+00:00): Hallo Eggie, dank! Zo klopt het idd helemaal. Belangrijkste punt is dat de richting van het eenrichtingsstuk verkeerd om stond. Dat staat nu goed. Overigens is het wel zo dat de max snelheid op deze weg middels een bord is aangegeven en daarop staat 20 (en dus geen 30).
eggie (2025-08-08 12:10:56+00:00): Oke Peter..
Geloof je direct.😀 Die maxspeed had ik op 20 gelaten. 
Mapse
eggie
t340ejfy (2025-08-06 20:25:52+00:00): Forgot to add source in changeset: NYCOpenData;https://data.cityofnewyork.us/Transportation/VZV_Speed-Limits/7n5j-865y
0xb7767000 (2025-08-07 07:28:53+00:00): Danke fürs anpassen der Radwege auf der Hochbrücke! Das schiebe ich schon ewig vor mir her, da mich die ganzen Fallstricke beim access= immer etwas abgeschreckt haben und der Ist-Sstand gut genug war.
Todeskuh (2025-08-07 10:52:34+00:00): Ich bin mal gespannt, ob das Bestand haben wird. Beispiele von Radwegen, die unterschiedliche Berechtigungen pro Richtung haben, und dabei nicht oneway oder baulich getrennt sind hatte ich bis noch nicht.
saberkovich (2025-08-06 20:38:14+00:00): Голосуем ЗА
Supaplex (2025-08-07 05:14:44+00:00): Hi, 

Please map things that exist in reality. We will roll back your edits.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170087129
Supaplex (2025-08-07 05:07:33+00:00): Hi armywildcat

It seems you are adding a non-exist feature next to a house. Please map what is on the ground.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Map_what's_on_the_ground
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170077823
German C (2025-12-03 21:48:08+00:00): Hola Lolj, ¿por que eliminaste los 4 edificios que estaban cerca a la rotonda del anillo vial? https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=170078003 (en rojo están resaltadas las eliminaciones que hiciste)
albheim (2025-08-07 07:28:06+00:00): I'm not sure if I have done something incorrect, in the editor I saw the direction flipped, but here when looking at the changeset I see it in the wrong direction? Did I somehow miss adding my change?
albheim (2025-08-07 07:55:22+00:00): Seems like it is expected and just some delay in the tiles being updated. Comparing the node order it the changesets it is reversed, so I think the changes went through.
Gregory Peony (2025-08-06 23:48:35+00:00): Much improved. This is the best group of building footprints you've mapped so far. Generally their size and shape are accurate and they have been appropriately squared. What made the difference? It does not appear that you accounted for off-nadir by dragging the footprint to the base of the buildings: the S & W walls are visible in Bing. I encourage you to use ESRI as a secondary source. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170078656
InsertUser (2025-08-07 13:01:46+00:00): Have you visited all of these yourself?
TheDutchMan13 (2025-08-07 14:23:02+00:00): I have not, but I'm aware all discount tire locations offer an inside store with air conditioning.
amosharper (2025-08-07 08:55:28+00:00): Thanks for the corrections!
gscscnd (2025-08-07 09:47:35+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1420615268
Zerknij na hierarchię na <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access>, np. foot=yes jest implikowane przez access=yes.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1314556590
tracktype=grade1 można pominąć dla highway=service + surface=asphalt.
user_5359 (2025-08-07 17:47:45+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1037127609. What is the mean of the tag 16А = 23
?
user_5359 (2025-08-07 17:46:47+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1420621606, https://www.osm.org/way/1420621609. What is the mean of the tag 04H = kerb?
aselvadeasfalto (2025-08-07 23:41:34+00:00): Hi, it was just a tagging type. All fixed now! Thank you for the notice
Hufkratzer (2025-08-07 22:03:31+00:00): Hi,
You have tagged https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1420621883 as a riding centre (leisure=horse_riding), but it is an arena. These are different things, iD has a different preset for riding arenas ("Horse Riding Arena").
Senihtu (2026-02-21 08:04:57+00:00): Hi!
Mit diesem Changeset hast Du bei Relation 13311138 bis auf route=bus und type=route alles tags entfernt.
Was ist mit dieser Route? Kann die weg?
gruß
Senihtu
Ótzï fón GlüϷgor (2026-02-21 13:46:50+00:00): Jo, kann weg. Das ist noch ein Überbleibsel der alten O Strecke, welche seit Dezember 2024 nicht mehr existiert.
Siehe https://www.rmv.de/c/fileadmin/import/timetable/DADINA_Linienfahrplan_O_ab_14.12.25_bis_12.12.26.pdf
Glassman (2025-08-08 23:30:12+00:00): #TIP: OSM started in England so we use Englands road classifications, including for sidewalks and paths. A footway is more like what we could call a sidewalk while a path is more like what we call a trail. Could you review this edit and confirm that Terrace Trail is a foodway?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170081292
❤️‍🔥 (2025-08-07 11:18:31+00:00): Hi, marking a building as demolished is somewhat complicated, what you need to do is open the "Tags" section and manually change "building" to "demolished:building" , see  https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/11ee4ef7-3698-4ac9-b19b-f9ed95faa7d7
Neon_Pickles (2025-08-09 22:26:37+00:00): Oh, sorry!! I'm still very new to this and just want to correct any mistakes I see on here, thank you for the guidance!
❤️‍🔥 (2025-08-12 22:32:51+00:00): no worries, thanks for updating this. i've corrected the syntax now
user_5359 (2025-08-07 07:11:19+00:00): Welcome to OSM! 
Could you please explain the background and sources for why you marked part of the airport infrastructure as commercial land use? Your comment suggests that you are not aware that you have made changes to a productive database.
Glassman (2025-08-08 23:32:32+00:00): If the stop is gone, you can just delete the node. If it has moved, free free to move it, and of course update the name. Let me know if you have any questions.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170081557
Tolhuis (2025-08-08 21:25:48+00:00): Hallo, kan je de adressen van de Stefaan De Jonghestraat en Sint Elooiskeer aanpassen zodat de straatnaam in het adres overeenkomt met de straatnaam? zie https://nominatim.org/qa/#map=17.38/50.90/3.53&layer=addr_street_wrong_name . Beide namen horen gelijk te zijn.
Tolhuis (2025-08-08 21:30:54+00:00): * en de Doctor Cyriel De Baerestraat.
djsa (2025-11-04 14:17:12+00:00): Hey Tolhuis, ik heb geen melding gekregen van je comment, vandaar m'n late reactie. M'n excuses!

Ik zie dat je het zelf reeds hebt gecorrigeerd, dankje!
Comino (2025-08-07 08:20:32+00:00): Hi,

In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes".

Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag !
Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead.

For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Merchants#legacy-tags
and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bitcoin

Happy mapping,

Edwin
user_5359 (2025-08-07 18:18:36+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/11523305628. What ist the mean of the tag S = 31-41?
anshanin (2025-08-08 19:28:03+00:00): Hello, this was a mistake. Thank you for pointing it out.
t_ja (2025-08-22 06:23:05+00:00): Ahoj,
aký je zdroj týchto zmien? Oficiálny zoznam ulíc mesta Žilina nemá žiadnu ulicu s takýmto názvom a ani hľadanie nevrátilo žiadny relevantný výsledok, napr. schválené VZN.

Ak je to len tvoj výmysel, tak prosím vráť všetky zmeny do pôvodného stavu.

T.
Ajper (2025-08-22 06:51:23+00:00): Zdrojom je eXtreme park a jeho jednotlivé podniky, ktoré majú dlhodobo uvedenú adresu s touto ulicou na všetkých svojich oficiálnych stránkach.
t_ja (2025-08-22 07:02:12+00:00): Extreme park si moze pisat, co sa mu zachce, ale nie je to oficialny zdroj.
Je mozne pouzit tieto zdroje:
- realne v terene najst cedulku s nazvom ulice, byva pripevnena na dome/plote na zaciatku a konci ulice,
- oficialny zoznam ulic mesta Zilina
- schvalene VZN mesta Zilina,
- register adries, z ktoreho cerpa napr. ZBGIS.

Hocijaky iny zdroj je len niekoho "vymysel", ktory do mapy nepatri.

T.
Rodrigo Rega (2025-09-02 23:51:08+00:00): Hi there, and thanks a lot for your contribution! Just a little tip for future edits: keeping changesets small and local can make things smoother for everyone. It helps prevent conflicts, makes it easier for fellow mappers to review, and keeps the map even more accurate.

A few friendly suggestions:
• Focus edits within a small geographical area (like a single city, district, or province)
• Try not to mix far-apart locations in one changeset
• Save/upload before starting work in a totally different area

If you’re curious, the wiki explains more here: osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks again for your mapping energy, and happy mapping!
AutumnFoughtEm (2025-11-28 19:58:16+00:00): Flock camera 13055277258 is not here anymore but I can’t delete it because it’s part of this changeset
Mmkay634 (2025-11-30 23:11:35+00:00): Ok thanks for the heads up. Maybe it’s the browser I’m on, but how do I look up which one it is?
user_5359 (2025-08-07 06:45:25+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! Ypu move the node https://www.osm.org/node/10300544355 more than 100 meters crossing other streets. I moved the point back to the original position.
on_thebus009 (2025-08-18 20:31:47+00:00): My bad, must have been a mouse slip.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-02 10:22:56+00:00): Hello!

You used
surface=asphalts-
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1107958121/history

Have you maybe meant
surface=asphalt
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
arichnad (2025-12-03 18:31:11+00:00): Hello,

I have fixed this mistake.

Yes it was my typo, ooops.  Sorry for the mistake, and thank you very much for catching it!

arichnad
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-03 18:37:06+00:00): and thanks for fixing it!

have a nice mapping day!
PcMouse1 (2026-01-24 21:47:22+00:00): Hello Shmaxwellithan, 

Were these buildings imported from an external dataset? If so, is the license compatible with the OpenStreetMap ODBL?

Cheers, PcMouse1
BCNorwich (2025-08-07 05:26:05+00:00): Please do not use a description for the name tag, it's against OSM best practice.

Regards Bernard.
Amelia Harper (2025-08-08 00:04:45+00:00): Okay understood, thank you!
5m4u9 (2025-08-07 04:05:22+00:00): Hola, gracias por añadir el sendero, no sabía que existía. Iré a explorar en este mes, parece tener un buen mirador en la cresta de la montaña.

le añadí algunas etiquetas más como dificultad y tipo de suelo para avisar la dificultad.
JaimeSBO (2025-08-08 03:26:07+00:00): Fui con un amigo que vive en Pihusi dice que hace algún tiempo era un sendero usado para ir a Laphia. Ahora sendero está un poco abandonado, pero se nota la senda en su mayoría. El inicio pasa al lado de un terreno que tiene un container y personas que viven ahí; hay que tener cuidado con los perros. Desde esa cresta se pueden ver muy bien las cascadas gemelas.
Timmy_Tesseract (2025-10-15 19:45:11+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap. If you use the "add place" function it will be added to a community-built global data base. Please only add places like for example convenience stores and agrarian shops that really exist. For personal bookmark Organic Maps has a separate function, just press "Save" at the bottom of the screen.
mueschel (2025-08-11 18:09:56+00:00): Hi,
you used some uncommon tags on guideposts here. Could you have a look to the very common direction_north etc. tags? 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:direction_north
ordinatous (2025-09-09 13:51:08+00:00): Bonjour, je n'avais pas vu cet échange dans le changeset. C'était une erreur de ma part, j'ai confondu destination et direction..
Désolé.
ordinatous (2025-09-09 13:52:20+00:00): Hi, sorry I didn't see your comment, it was a mistake btw destination and direction.
Sorry.
citrula (2025-08-07 18:35:16+00:00): Welcome to OSM. Are bikes really not allowed on this road?
Taya_S (2025-08-17 10:21:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted DWG Ticket#2025081710000139
Addresses have been incorrectly added as name, no sources are cited and were reported as nonsensical, and the user does not communicate. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18623

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170558601
felipeeugenio (2025-08-07 13:43:42+00:00): Hola. por favor no agregar información privada.
gracias
aharvey (2025-08-07 05:18:28+00:00): could you please provide further information about why the field is no longer there? if you provide this in the changeset comment it helps other mappers understand why the changes were made, without this justification and due to the dragged node I've reverted this changeset.

it can also be helpful to map out what's there instead (if the field is no longer there).
aharvey (2025-08-07 05:14:26+00:00): I've reverted this as the only change was to drag the node, going by your changeset comment it seems like you knew something went wrong, why did you proceed to upload it then?
SpinOff (2025-08-19 21:40:46+00:00): Jak powstanie, to wtedy zmapujemy. Na razie usunąłem
5m4u9 (2025-08-07 15:55:51+00:00): hola, solo comentar que las imágenes bing tienen un desplazamiento respecto a los datos, porque no se ha corregido la pendiente de las laderas de montañas.

Para encontrar la "verdadera" ubicación de las calles, tienes que activar las trazas GPS en la pestaña background (tecla B) y mover unos metros hasta central la imagen... creo que es 3 al sur y 2 metros al este.... las trazas tienen que estar más o menos en el centro de las calles. 

Justo esa calle no trazas pero si las otras. Cada vez que cambias de ubicación (calles arriba o calles abajo o a los lados) hay que ajustar la imagen a las trazas.

Es tedioso, sí, pero la otra sería ir a pedir permiso de usar las imágenes de la alcaldía y ponerlo en el editor así tenemos ortofotos o coseguir a alguien que tiene drone y capturar fotos.... :(
Tommybara (2025-09-29 01:17:20+00:00): Bạn có thể cho biết bạn căn cứ vào nguồn ở đâu để vẽ hướng tuyến Chơn Thành - Hoa Lư không? Vì đoạn cao tốc này thậm chí chỉ mới được quy hoạch, chưa thấy tỉnh Bình Phước cũ lên kế hoạch khảo sát hướng tuyến nữa.
user_5359 (2025-08-07 06:31:36+00:00): Welcome to OSM! 
A route is not a path. A route is a combination of other existing paths (simplified representation) that is presented as a relation. 

A route between two arbitrary points should be displayed on a map, but not stored in the OSM data.

I have reverted your change.
user_5359 (2025-08-07 06:16:38+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I revert your change set, because you over paint an existing residential landuse and add a misleading name.
impiaaa (2025-08-07 18:32:25+00:00): You can tag a street that has a different name on both sides with name:left=* and name:right=* https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name:left
Black_Diamond (2025-08-08 00:19:45+00:00): Yeah I suspected that could be used. I’m thinking of using that further to the east where it’s more ambiguous. On this segment there are only addresses with Homestead. 2 out of 3 signs don’t use the cardinal direction.

Where it switches back to Sunnyvale is where I have to investigate further.

It’s confusing when one side of a sign uses one name and the other side uses a slightly different name.

Using alt_name seems appropriate for this segment at this time.

Thanks for the suggestion.
trial (2025-08-08 11:42:49+00:00): Bonjour, la modification me semble étonnante (pas fausse) car la voie vers Gestel a été modélisée comme 2 voies, et donc les sens uniques avec des lane:backward, etc. n'a plus de sens (oui, c'est @MacDony qui a repris ça, je lui signale ce changeset).
MacDony (2025-08-08 12:06:59+00:00): Bonjour,
C'est corrigé.
Ne pas hésiter à corriger si j'ai oublié une modification.
Denis
trial (2025-08-08 15:11:03+00:00): Je confirme, impec'.
SafwatHalaby (2025-08-27 08:20:44+00:00): שלום! לתשומת לבכם אתם עושים שימוש לא תקין בתגית Cycle Path (cycleway) .

הדבר הזה שמור לנתיבי אופניים יעודיים, למשל מסלול אופניים ליד כביש ראשי בתל אביב.

אתם אמורים להוסיף Path רגיל עבור סינגלים או מסלולי שטח.
user_5359 (2025-08-08 15:01:29+00:00): Hallo! Schau Dir bitte mal https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/29yq an. Da scheint mit dem Schlüssel eb schief gegangen sein (vermutlich website)?
geozeisig (2025-08-09 05:20:36+00:00): Hab es korrigiert
Danke für den Hinweis
eggie (2025-08-07 06:58:07+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback   Probeer indien mogelijk op een bestaande adresnode bij te taggen. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
aharvey (2025-08-07 07:14:01+00:00): reverted
aharvey (2025-08-07 07:14:14+00:00): reverted
Mikey Co (2025-08-29 17:43:20+00:00): I thin you've broken the multipolygon which mapped the wooded section of Dartford Heath
jajanja3 (2025-08-29 17:46:14+00:00): I will fix it at some point.
martin-kokos (2025-10-24 09:15:26+00:00): Dobrý den. Šel jsem okolo a nedokázal jsem potvrdit tuto firmu. Nerozumím jestli se jedná o firmu Dynatrace nebo Runecast. Například ostatní firmy v okolí jsou popsány jednoduchým a jednoznačním názvem. Šlo by to nějak upravit, popřípadně dovyplnit short_name=? Taky prosím, do popisku description= se píše popis entity, ne popis budovy. Pokud chcete označit budovy, tak prosím, do name=, ale k jednotlivým budovám.
Tomáš Odehnal (2025-10-24 10:55:58+00:00): Dobrý den,
díky moc za komentář a doporučení. Jedná se o firmu Dynatrace, Runecast je předchozí název před akvizicí (použil jsem stejné jméno jaké zadali na Google Maps). Přesunul tenhle text do description, v name použil jméno pobočky a v short_name krátké jméno společnosti. Název budovy jsem odstranil, všiml jsem si, že ta je uvedena u celého objektu.
martin-kokos (2025-10-24 15:33:13+00:00): Díkyt za opravu. do website taky není zvykem dávat více hodnot, aplikace s tím nepočítají, viz. rozbity odkaz napřiklad na https://osmapp.org/node/13019356746

Doporučuji novým mapperům se obeznámit s atributami na wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Key:description
Popřípadně kouknout po věcech v okolí jak se obvykle zadávají. Na příkladu třeba jak se značí budovy - kouknout třeba na nemocnici nebo univerzitu kde už jsou označeny podle nějaké konvence.
Tomáš Odehnal (2025-10-25 09:38:07+00:00): Někde jsem to určitě okoukal, teď se ale dívám, že více hodnot oddělených středníkem by se raději používat nemělo. Díky za upozornění a doporučení, příště budu pozornější.
martin-kokos (2025-10-25 18:48:58+00:00): Ano, používá se to na oddělení několika hodnot, většinou textových/číselných. Website a url jsou takové technické a obsahují všelijaké znaky, tak bych to nedoporučil (na wiki konkretne u website je popsáno jako jedna hodnota) - technicky středník může být součást URL, čili nelze použít jako oddělovací znak.
Vídím že několik málo případů však je https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2ekB
martin-kokos (2025-10-25 18:56:13+00:00): Tady je středník dokonce jako součást URL.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/53022111
Ale to je taková okrajová kuriozita, chápu že se tomu běžně nedá dobrat.
uprkos (2025-10-30 21:01:00+00:00): Coś nie tak jest z nazwą. Poza tym to raczej opis, a nie nazwa własna. I czy naprawdę można to nazwać 'atrakcją turystyczną'?
Damian9S (2025-11-01 14:11:30+00:00): W kategorii nie ma takiego czegoś jak obiekt historyczny aby się przydało. 
Można wybrać atrakcje lub muzeum ani jedno ani drugie do tego nie pasuje. 
To co zaznaczyłem jest przedwojenną zaporą hydrotechniczną. Systemu Festungsfront im Oder-Warthe Bogen
C_1965 (2025-08-07 09:49:28+00:00): Hallo Jens,
Du hast rund um den Neding verbesert und detaillierter dargestellt. Dabei ist aber auch ein Felsen östlich vom Neding 336 m verschwunden (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1169688272#map=19/49.198323/7.858666&layers=N)
Ist das beabsichtigt?
Viele Grüße Christoph