piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
DerKaiserschmarren (2026-05-27 08:56:42+00:00): Also zumindest betrifft das die Stammhausstraße
DerKaiserschmarren (2026-05-27 09:41:37+00:00): Sorry es scheint du hast recht. Die doppelten Schilder sind mittlerweile weg.
DerKaiserschmarren (2026-05-27 09:41:50+00:00): Also alles passt wie es eingetragen ist.
gnlpfth (2026-05-27 15:39:16+00:00): Okay, das beruhigt mich. Ich erinnere mich noch an den Edit, den habe ich vor allem umgesetzt, weil die Adressen "rechts" zur Verkehrsfläche "links" gehören. Aber grundsätzlich gibt es wesentlich bessere Lösungen für ein derartiges Doppelnamensproblem, als beide mit Komma hintereinander zu setzen
DerKaiserschmarren (2026-05-28 05:03:33+00:00): Mit dem Komma steht es aber sogar auf Basemap.at ;)
Das habe ich von dort übernommen gehabt, da es damals auch zur Beschilderung passte.
Baloo Uriza (2026-03-20 16:31:04+00:00): This should be noname=yes; refs are not names.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180134049
Tomas09 (2026-04-28 23:41:57+00:00): It seems to me that 99% of landuse in this changeset could second as toilet... To be more serious though, please try to keep your changesets local. Aswell as using the comment feature to actually describe what you changed. Happy mapping!
FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (2026-03-22 08:42:50+00:00): danke.
FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (2026-03-22 08:37:34+00:00): danke dir!
ieguy3 (2026-03-20 01:19:39+00:00): jackrabbit trail was annexed. forgot to include it in the last update for this area
UKChris (2026-06-21 17:35:39+00:00): Why did you remove "Little Acre Park" from Norton Fitzwarren?? It hasn't been demolished - what was your source?
LordGarySugar (2026-06-21 20:47:07+00:00): Hi Chris, I marked the buildings here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1490879483 as demolished because they looked to be that way on Bing and Esri imagery - if they are new houses and aren't on imagery yet I can restore them.
UKChris (2026-06-21 22:41:50+00:00): Please do restore them if you can, they have been there for a while now. I think what you've seen on the imagery from Bing is the pre-markers for the static caravans before they were installed.
LordGarySugar (2026-06-22 18:33:26+00:00): Restored in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184410364 :)
UKChris (2026-06-24 16:23:17+00:00): Thank you for doing that :)
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2026-03-20 02:14:42+00:00): 抓到活的在线的billchen了喵（不过其实甚至可以画地下连起来这样它在routing里面就不会是两条断头路了
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180135442
mueschel (2026-03-21 09:44:33+00:00): Hi,
you added "Developer" on hundreds of buildings instead of "developer". Please have a look.
LordGarySugar (2026-03-21 18:00:38+00:00): Thanks, fixed now, with an obvious typo such as this you are welcome to go ahead and make the correction yourself
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2026-03-20 02:12:52+00:00): if yh:WIDTH is correct, you can transfer it to widely used OSM tag following https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:width#Width_of_streets
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180135481
arjunaraoc (2026-03-20 04:20:21+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180135549
ieguy3 (2026-03-20 02:31:56+00:00): it was annexation of camelback road
Hb- (2026-03-20 02:51:58+00:00): note/5137421
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2026-03-20 11:58:27+00:00): 请在回退后做出必要的提示，例如在你退掉的 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180125475 中最好是用直接的不费猜的方式来介绍它已经被退了。是的，这里是有很多有争议的编辑，但你不去说明为什么不行，那怎么有后续的改善呢？是的，它这次是一个地名全删的编辑，但如果不去说明这样是不行的，那么过几天还会有新的再一次再一次的这样的编辑出现，就和之前某次一些需要做作业的想要纯净的底图就删name的事情一样，我们应该去预防这种事情持续发生。
ieguy3 (2026-03-20 03:44:36+00:00): someone created a duplicate maricopa county for the county islands
ieguy3 (2026-03-20 03:46:09+00:00): they didn't annex the parkway/parking strip for some reason
aighes (2026-03-28 12:43:20+00:00): Hey,
I noticed you changed a couple of crossings in that area. Please pay attention to only add crossings, if it is actually a crossing and not just a driveway. Usually you can identify actual crossings by kerbs or something similar.
A good question to ask yourself: Does a ped need to pay any attention?
aighes (2026-03-28 12:46:56+00:00): and btw. it's duplicate tagging to add crossing=unmarked to an existing crossing:markings=no
PedestrianMapping_PathRelay (2026-03-31 08:38:11+00:00): Thanks for your feedback ; much appreciated. We will make sure to work carefully in such cases going forward
aighes (2026-03-29 13:11:14+00:00): Hey GeoMasker,
any reason for removing the crossing:signals tags?
It's appreciated you work on fixing complex intersections, but please don't delete correct data from OSM.
PedestrianMapping_GeoMasker (2026-03-31 10:11:44+00:00): Hi aighes
I really appreciate you pointing this out. My intention is to improve complex intersections, not to remove correct or valuable data. We’ll review this carefully and make sure to follow your suggestion and correct the data as well
aighes (2026-03-29 13:01:01+00:00): On 13 Mile / Woodward Ave you added traffic islands on the footway. Which is in deed correct, but as a result, now the road is crossing the footway in the traffic island. That's definitely not the case. Please either split the road to get the crossing geometry straight or get revert your traffic island to match the level of detail of the road. Both level of details need to match. Otherwise the data itself is useless.
PedestrianMapping_GeoMasker (2026-03-31 08:43:11+00:00): Thanks for the feedback aighes! We have reviewed the issue and corrected the data accordingly. We’ll make sure that going forward, any changes are made in the best possible way while maintaining consistent levels of detail
literan (2026-03-21 10:02:06+00:00): не вся территория представляет собой строительную площадку, слишком грубо отметили. Откачу в этой части
user_8655426 (2026-03-20 13:13:49+00:00): こんにちは。全国各地の郵便局を大量に編集されていますが、source とされている KSJ2 は OpenStreetMap の情報源として使用することができません。
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Import/Catalogue/Japan_KSJ2_Import

OSMで利用可能なデータソースや情報収集方法などについては、以下のページでご確認ください。
・利用可能なデータソース
https://openstreetmap.jp/node/764
・データの情報源
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Beginners_Guide_1.1
pseek (2026-03-21 01:15:55+00:00): コメントありがとうございます。

編集するにあたり、国土数値情報は当方はソースとしてはおりません。
メモの欄は、14年ほど前にこのデータを編集した方の表記と思われます。

利用可能なデータベースの情報、お教えいただきありがとうございます。
理解、習熟に努めます。
大山かなめ (2026-03-22 07:44:34+00:00): いくつか気になる点があるので、箇条書きで整理しますね
1.KSJ(国土数値情報)からの情報を現在「新たに」マッピングに使用することは許されていない

ここまでMappin' Jack Flashさんの解説した内容と同じで、付け加えとして

2.KSJの使用が許されていた当時にマッピングされた内容について、取り除いたりする必要があるとまでは決まっていない
3.「変更セットへのsourceタグ」を付与されていないことが、新たにKSJからの情報を取り込んだと誤解された原因かもしれない
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Key:source
>現在のエディタでは、 source=* タグは一般的に、さまざまな情報源に基づいて別々な時期に更新される可能性がある情報の切れ端へのタグとしてではなく、変更が行われる際に変更セットに追加されます。

3番が重要で、マッピングするつもりをもって現地で状況を確認した場合は「survey」（現地調査）、昔から時々行く場所などで知っていれば「local knowledge」（地元の知識）などをsourceとして示すことで、誤解は防げるかと思います
pseek (2026-03-22 08:03:55+00:00): コメント、そしてわかりやすくご説明いただきありがとうございます。

sourceタグについて、明らかに知識不足でした。
ご指摘いただいた「3」の点をふまえ、改善を図ります。

勝手ではありますが、さらに改善が必要な点がありましたら、ぜひお教えください。
大山かなめ (2026-03-27 10:30:25+00:00): 状況が気になったので改めて検証ツール（OSMCha）で確認したところ、変更ではなく「作成」された（バージョン（版）が1である）ポイントにおいてもsourceとsource_refが付いていたのですね
これは誤解されるというより、真正面から「GSImaps/seamlessphotoとGSImaps/stdとsurveyとKSJ2という情報源を使いました」という宣言そのものなので、指摘が入って仕方がないかと思います。
もし、書き方の手本として近隣郵便局を真似たのであれば、各タグが何を意味するか注意を払ったほうがよさそうです
大山かなめ (2026-03-27 10:53:41+00:00): （これはあなた固有ではなく、同じタグ付けをしている誰にでも言えるのですが、参考として）
short_name=郵便局なども少し不可解です。
本来の意味としてはnameの「短縮形」、たとえば「首都圏中央連絡自動車道」に対する「圏央道」のようなものなので、拠点（支店）名を除いた一般的な施設の名前の部分を単に書き写すのは、意味的には変です
既にあるものを「消し回る」となると逆に自動編集の規範的な問題があるのですが、新規作成する限りは意味が謎だと思う部分を取り除いた方がいいかもしれません
大山かなめ (2026-03-27 10:58:54+00:00): あわせてこれも一般的な助言なのですが、変更セットのコメント（この欄ではなく、編集を送る時に書くやつです）は、地名のみよりも5W1H的な感覚で「何を」「どうした」あたりを加えておくと、良い編集をしている人だと見られやすいのでお勧めします
「鴨川市、南房総市、館山市で郵便局の修正や追加」など
以上、複数コメント失礼しました
pseek (2026-03-28 01:12:39+00:00): また丁寧なご返答、ありがとうございます。

ご指摘いただいた

・sourceタグの意味に注意を払う
・変更セットのコメントに具体性を持たせる

これらの点、新たな課題として留意してまいります。

アドバイスをいただけること、とても心強いです。
A67-A67 (2026-03-20 15:26:03+00:00): It seems you didn't delete the tag note:access, which explains the access-tag you've removed. Did you read this explanation? Why do you think it isn't valid anymore?
rajdhani (2026-03-21 16:35:25+00:00): Hi A67-A67,
Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you.
rajdhani (2026-05-20 17:09:14+00:00): Hi A67-A67,

Thanks for taking the time to review this edit and for pointing out the issue.

In this case, the changes were based on active GPS traces indicating vehicle movement and direction. However, without supporting ground-level imagery or a reliable local source, we avoided removing the existing restriction or note:access tags.

I’ll take extra care with similar edits going forward to ensure they better reflect the local context. If you have additional information or sources, feel free to share.
whitepanda (2026-03-23 05:39:42+00:00): Partially Revert of : 180100027
iandees (2026-03-20 14:06:10+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4938267654 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180161493, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
cnroddball (2026-07-30 16:45:59+00:00): Your sidewalk pathing has sidewalks running through street intersections. OSM won't allow me to fix these errors. Please repair them.
eggie (2026-03-20 07:19:54+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback Paden die afgesloten zijn taggen we met access=no Dus niet verwijderen.
Paden die onbruikbaar zijn gemaakt en opgaan in het landschap taggen we eerst als disused:highway=path  .  Dat voorkomt opnieuw intekenen omdat de paden vaak op een luchtfoto als PDOK nog te zien zijn.
De paden routeerden al niet.
Wanneer het pad door de weide ook niet meer te zien is met sporen kan deze ook op disused:highway=path worden gezet.
Beter dus niet zomaar paden verwijderen. 
Ik heb de changeset teruggedraaid. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-03-20 07:21:32+00:00): reverted by changeset #180144278
eggie (2026-03-20 07:24:48+00:00): reverted by changeset #180144474

Zoals al eerder gemeld. ... 
Het was hier al correct getagd met zelfs een note= Afgesloten paden in rustgebied, deels met borden, deels met versperringen met bomen aangegeven

Wanneer er weinig van het pad meer te zien is kan het op disused:highway=path

Dat voorkomt opnieuw intekenen door een medemapper die alleen naar luchtfoto's kijkt.. en dan ontbreken wellicht de juiste accesstags.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-03-20 07:33:06+00:00): Voorlopig teruggedraaid en aangepast naar disused:highway
Witruimte verwijderd
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-05-28 08:46:42+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13433682624/history has image = https://streetcomplete.app/p/329749.jpg that was added in this edit
https://streetcomplete.app/p/329749.jpg is a link to a temporary files hosted at streetcomplete.app. Note that this images will be deleted after note is closed! So adding it to OSM objects is not very useful.

Upload your photos to for example Wikimedia Commons if you want to keep them (and link with wikimedia_commons=). Uploading photos made by someone else needs a license assignment.
NeisBot (2026-03-20 07:12:39+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 19 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/827774346 v3 | 11 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1119273621 v2 | 8 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180144098
iandees (2026-03-20 14:06:26+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10236532415 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180161507, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
literan (2026-03-21 10:00:56+00:00): зачем вы отрисовываете кусок крыши давно снесенного здания?
Ozon_OSM11 (2026-03-22 11:53:34+00:00): Здравствуйте, сейчас здание выглядит совсем не так, как на снимках 2025 г., по которым я отрисовала данный объект. Спасибо за замечание, переделаем по кадастру.
literan (2026-03-22 16:39:21+00:00): тут нет здания, оно снесено. Здесь стройка сейчас
Ozon_OSM11 (2026-03-23 15:45:53+00:00): Здравствуйте, ошибочно отрисованное здание удалила сразу же после Вашего замечания. Спасибо.
TrickyFoxy (2026-03-22 00:44:19+00:00): Зачем добавлять в название родника название деревни?
spiregrain (2026-03-20 09:30:08+00:00): In this massive changeset, you removed the name of the BBC Music Studios building - did you mean to do that?  I'm looking forward to seeing the results come through on https://demo.f4map.com/ soon.
JJ_P (2026-03-22 08:17:18+00:00): Hi! I didn't do it intentionally, I didn't notice that I deleted it, I apologize and will fix it. Thank you for pointing out the error to me.
spiregrain (2026-03-22 14:02:31+00:00): no problem!  very happy to see all the building detail added.     I only asked because I thought maybe the BBC had changed their name for it or something like thyat
JJ_P (2026-03-23 10:33:03+00:00): Thank you!
Baloo Uriza (2026-03-20 16:28:55+00:00): I would generally include the street names on sidewalks for the same reasons they're included on all carriageways of a road with more than one carriageway.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180145760
Rambling Banjo (2026-03-20 19:21:57+00:00): That makes sense. Now that I've looked into it, there is documentation on the wiki regarding this practice. I appreciate the feedback.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180145760
skquinn (2026-03-20 17:59:43+00:00): Hi,

Congratulations on your first OpenStreetMap edit! Here are some helpful tips for future additions to the map:

1. Phone number should be formatted in international format (starting with +1).
2. opening_hours has a specific syntax intended to be machine- as well as human-readable; it is not a freeform "anything goes" format. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours for details.
3. Addresses have a specific format as well and are spread across multiple tags. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses for details.
4. The description tag (lowercase "d") is not for advertising or ad copy. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description for details.
d_berger (2026-03-21 09:42:34+00:00): Please, stop removing OSM objects, if you don't know their purpose and/or function. PTv2 asks for a platform and a stop position, it's not PTv1. Thank you.
Takuto (2026-05-30 19:43:48+00:00): Не нужно на пересечении дороги и реки ставить точку, даже если на это ругается валидатор. Точка означает что они физически пересекаются, и там либо брод, либо нет проезда. Для корректного решения такой проблемы нужно либо разрезать дорогу и создать на ней мост (bridge=yes, layer=1), или разрезать реку и создать на ней водопропускную трубу (tunnel=culvert, layer=-1).
ssundell (2026-04-19 19:14:43+00:00): Aaltosenkadun aiemmin jalkakäytäväksi merkitty osuus on jalkakäytävä, siellä on aiheesta kertova liikennemerkki.

Tammelankadun vastaavalla pätkällä ei liikennemerkkiä ole, joten sen merkitseminen on vähän tulkinnanvaraisempaa, mutta jalkakäytäväksi merkkaamisen puolesta puhuu, että se on sangen kapea ränni, ja itäpäässä se on erotettu korkealla rotvallilla ajoradasta, ts. itäisen Tammelankadun ajoradalta - jossa pyöräilijän pitäisi ajaa - ei ole madallettua kulkua tuolle väylälle.
ssundell (2026-04-19 19:15:21+00:00): En myöskään ihan tajua tuota, että Tammelan koulu on muutettu päiväkodiksi.
ssundell (2026-04-19 19:23:23+00:00): Lisää ihmettelyä: TOAS Pekolan parking_aislet ovat nähdäkseni juuri niitä. Osa noista aiemmin footway-merkinnöllä olleista väylistä ovat ehkä mieluummin driveway, mutta ne drivewayt tuskin jatkuvat takana kulkevalle pyörätielle asti.
Pinnan muuttaminen asphalt => paved on ihan vain virhe.
dremdau (2026-04-20 15:01:20+00:00): Tuon päiväkodiksi muuttamisen taustalla taitaa olla se että iD jostain kumman syystä ehdottaa jokaisen Tampereen kaupungin koulun kohdalla vaihtamaan se päiväkodiksi. Eli tässä on kaiketi vain sokeasti menty editorin ehdotusten perässä?
ssundell (2026-04-20 15:45:59+00:00): Ah, justiinsa. :|
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-22 08:02:31+00:00): Merged three duplicate objects for SEO "Tipid Camp Baguio" guest house POI, cleaned up tags and removed it from administrative boundary relation it was inexplicably added to, in changeset 184419661

https://osm.org/changeset/184419661
BCNorwich (2026-03-20 12:02:35+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The feature is not the whole building so I've made it a POI.

Regards Bernard.
NeisBot (2026-03-20 08:54:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/8809792881 v4

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Auto Body Repair"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-03-28 11:33:05+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/180356629
eggie (2026-03-20 09:27:09+00:00): Dag MTijn. De waterway heb ik losgemaakt van de brug

MVG
eggie
Yog Sot (2026-03-20 12:05:43+00:00): cieszę się, że ogarnałeś relacje inner/outer ;D
Zrobiłem pare mian też dodatkowych

tu masz wms z BDL jak masz wątpliwości czy cos jest lasem czy nie:
https://mapserver.bdl.lasy.gov.pl/arcgis/services/WMS_BDL/MapServer/WmsServer?FORMAT=image/png&TRANSPARENT=TRUE&VERSION=1.3.0&SERVICE=WMS&REQUEST=GetMap&LAYERS=4,5,3,2,6,1,0&STYLES=&CRS={proj}&WIDTH={width}&HEIGHT={height}&BBOX={bbox}
totera (2026-03-31 18:03:04+00:00): Premesso che per mesi ci sono stati i jersey in plastica sopra la vecchia segnaletica, dall'alto della tua non conoscenza dei posti che mappi hai avuto pure la presunzione che sia stato smantellato il sottopasso pedonale?
mga_geo (2026-03-21 05:43:43+00:00): Bonjour,
Je viens de refaire la continuité de deux relations bus r19752839 et r19752840.
Elles ne sont pas citées dans ce changeset, oubli de téléchargement de la zone ?
Marc
pyrog (2026-03-22 07:38:06+00:00): Probablement.
Je ne pense pas toujours à charger tous les objets le long d'un itinéraire.

Tu utilises quel outil pour détecter la casse ?
Est-ce qu'il t'envoit des notifications ou es-tu surveilles-tu régulièrementle réseau de bus ?

Yves
pyrog (2026-03-22 07:38:32+00:00): PS: merci pour les réparations.
mga_geo (2026-03-22 21:05:10+00:00): Bonsoir,
Je surveille PTNA qui surveille entre autres les réseaux bretons: https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/FR/index.php

Marc
pyrog (2026-03-23 15:13:39+00:00): Il nous manque un outil qui surveille ces analyseurs (PTNA, WMT, KPN…) et qui nous envoi des notifications par mél…

…en attendant que cette fonctionnalité soit intégrée directement dans ces outils.
eggie (2026-03-20 09:18:13+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback   .. Hoe kan nu een adres op deze locatie veranderen?
De juiste procedure is om de adresnode te ontdoen van de bedrijfsinfo en op de nieuwe locatie weer bij te taggen op de nieuwe adresnode.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-03-20 09:22:40+00:00): Adres hersteld.. bedrijf verplaatst
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2026-03-22 02:53:11+00:00): Merhaba. Sokakların ve caddelerin adını yazarken baş harflerini büyük yazmanız daha iyi olur. Bkz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Capitalisation

Örneğin "1194. Sokak" şeklinde.

İyi günler.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-22 08:02:57+00:00): Merged three duplicate objects for SEO "Tipid Camp Baguio" guest house POI, cleaned up tags and removed it from administrative boundary relation it was inexplicably added to, in changeset 184419661

https://osm.org/changeset/184419661
eggie (2026-03-20 09:30:23+00:00): Beste Het bedrijf staat hier al getagd. Nu is het dubbel.
Ik haal één vermelding weer weg.
Kovoschiz (2026-03-20 18:21:20+00:00): Please don't make locations obviously not towns `=town`
Dimitar155 (2026-03-20 14:37:49+00:00): EveryDoor е доста по-удобен за такива промени, спрямо CoMaps 

https://every-door.app/
mechka (2026-03-29 17:10:09+00:00): Благодаря. Следващия път ще пробвам приложението
NeisBot (2026-03-20 09:51:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/11736399718 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Integration office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-28 11:33:07+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180538339
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
NeisBot (2026-03-20 09:54:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13664426793 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Travel agency"
---
Örneğin metnin daha tarafsız ve gerçek bir versiyonu şöyle olabilir: "Seyahat acentası"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-03-28 11:33:10+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/180233134
iandees (2026-03-20 14:06:45+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1558411140 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180161523, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!