piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-31 17:49:59+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11908994206/history has fixme:type = shop that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What kind of shop is here?

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop for common values - is any of them fitting?
coffeesippingbastard (2025-03-31 18:07:37+00:00): It's a wholesale grain trader shop. Can't be called a general store or super market. They only sell grains
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-31 18:13:17+00:00): are they selling solely rice or also other grains?
coffeesippingbastard (2025-03-31 18:26:20+00:00): As far as I know it's rice and wheat primarily.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-31 18:34:48+00:00): added shop=wholesale_grain_trader then
aliensuperstar (2024-05-16 13:40:18+00:00): Thank you!
Mingwei (2024-05-16 21:33:48+00:00): Seems good
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-21 09:26:42+00:00): source=Bing; Esri World Imagery

How you mapped conservation area (legal object) based on aerial imagery?
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-21 09:35:46+00:00): In other words: what is the real source for this edit?
Anil Basnet (2024-05-22 13:52:43+00:00): https://dnpwc.gov.np/en/conservation-area-detail/67/
chris66 (2025-05-28 08:30:17+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11909073669

Hi,
ist da wirklich ein AED mitten auf dem Feld?
NeisBot (2024-05-16 05:25:04+00:00): Hi Vanillareal, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/node/11909058836

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
NeisBot (2024-05-16 06:11:37+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151390830
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-16 06:11:47+00:00): Please don't add fake beaches to OSM!
YoungHiro45 (2024-05-22 22:58:13+00:00): Hello Jacksonville,
I noticed that you are currently working on updating the motorway network in Pakistan. In one of your edits, a portion of the M-15 Motorway was reclassified from trunk to motorway. Based on (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M-15_motorway (Pakistan)), this route is technically named the M-15 Motorway, which is a bit misleading in regards to OSM. Motorways are typically described as having at least two lanes in each direction with some degree of separation (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmotorway). There is also documentation for Pakistan tagging guidelines on (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Pakistan) which can help determine road classifications. With this in mind, would you consider reclassifying this section back to trunk?

I look forward to hearing from you!
Best regards,
Jacksonville (2024-05-22 23:24:05+00:00): Hi YoungHiro45,

Apologies! Yes of course. I wasn't aware of the guidelines, but it makes sense now! I'll try and reclassify the sections back to trunk! Feel free to undo any other changes / mistakes I may have made.
Jacksonville (2024-05-22 23:27:23+00:00): Am I correct in assuming that the entire part of the 'M-15 motorway' after Mansehra is supposed be classified as a Trunk road?
YoungHiro45 (2024-05-24 13:46:57+00:00): Hello Jacksonville, thanks for making those changes! In regards to the M-15 Motorway tagged south of Mansehra, that has been motorway for several years now.  There may be multiple factors for why that is currently Motorway. It might be best to leave it as is and try to involve more community members in that decision.
Falkons (2024-05-23 20:39:24+00:00): Hey George, great job on adding all TheBus routes all around Oahu. Definitely would be a pain to do. Just as a note, when aligning roads, you should do it based on GPS traces or on Strava Heatmap if you want. The Bing/Esri satellite imagery isn't aligned correctly.
GeorgeMann1 (2024-05-27 08:08:02+00:00): Oh god... should've read this before I did route 60. I'm not exactly the most experienced with OSM so you wouldn't happen to know an easy way to do that within the editor would you? I know archGIS has a map of all the bus stops in their exact locations but it'd be a pain to translate that into OSM conveniently.
Falkons (2024-05-27 20:09:48+00:00): Within the ID editor (web), there is an option to realign imagery but not possible to overlay something like Strava heatmaps but at least GPS traces is available albeit not being available everywhere since people have to upload it themselves to OSM. Using that you can still align the imagery up close enough (will never be perfect lol). Using a desktop editor like JOSM (with plugins for assistance) would be an alternative allowing for easier editing of big relations like bus routes. Checking the wiki would be better for understanding how to possibly set that up. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM
aTarom (2024-05-16 10:00:03+00:00): Hola, bienvenido, puedes revisar esto como banco?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/571460542/history
Saludos
Robot8A (2024-10-18 10:14:59+00:00): Arreglado en https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158043409
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-16 06:10:35+00:00): Thanks for reverting @ TheSwavu.

I guess we should also remove the following way: https://osm.org/way/1283479442
TheSwavu (2024-05-16 06:19:52+00:00): Thanks, I did not notice they had fiddled around so much. I have reverted the other changesets.
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-16 06:22:28+00:00): 👍 Thanks again TheSwavu.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-05-16 06:10:15+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11909132298

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
dypa (2024-05-17 08:56:29+00:00): При указании размеченных не регулируемых пешеходных переходов нельзя использовать тег crossing=zebra, см https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:crossing=zebra

Пожалуйста при внесении следующих правок используйте теги (Размеченный (нерегулируемый) пешеходный переход)
crossing=uncontrolled
crossing:markings=zebra
NeisBot (2024-05-16 06:20:06+00:00): Hi Joe A B, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1283527756

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-16 17:02:03+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/151404288
silversurfer83 (2024-05-16 07:35:11+00:00): Gude :)

zwei Hinweise zu dieser Änderung und Allgemein:

- der "Name" der Gedenktafel sieht arg beschreibend aus. Ggf. gehört der Wert in das Feld "description=*". Einfach mal mit https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen abgleichen. Ist aber nur eine Vermutung.

- deine Änderungssatzkommentare sind leider aktuell genausowenig hilfreich wie "plöp" oder gar kein Kommentar. Bitte hier nochmal gucken und das in Zukunft aus Rücksicht ein wenig anpassen. Danke schön
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

happy mapping
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151391009
CENTSOARER (2024-05-19 01:54:41+00:00): Estimado contribuidor:

Es bueno tener miembros en SLP dispuestos a cooperar con el mapa, pero si son sus isómeras ediciones, quizá lo recomendable es que comience con la creación de puntos de interés o edificios que le faltan al mapa.

En este caso, la "delimitación del perímetro A" del centro histórico no parece decir mucho en realidad y aunque proporciona una cita, no hay una referencia; luego usted utiliza el etiquetado de uso de suelo comercial en plena área urbana como una relación, que no es el uso estándar en openstreetmap. De paso modificó una serie de relaciones de nivel administrativo 10 (colonias) y algunas otras según le pareció necesario.

En suma, para ser su primera edición en OSM, tomó varias decisiones temerarias con respecto al mapa. Me tocará tratar de revertir esta situación.
CENTSOARER (2024-05-19 01:58:58+00:00): This is the first changeset by the author, and they made some questionable decisions in the heart of the city without any consultation.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151516932
NeisBot (2024-05-16 06:25:07+00:00): Hi Joe A B, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1283528634

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-16 17:02:26+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/151404288
Ilovemap1999 (2024-05-16 06:57:29+00:00): Tại sao wayID: 213337071 bạn lại xoá tag motor_vehicle = no? Có thể bạn quên thêm tag motorcar=destination tại way ID này
Ilovemap1999 (2024-05-16 07:01:58+00:00): wayid:652376821 mới đúng.
DressyPear4 (2024-05-16 21:48:10+00:00): Por que as edificações e torres de comunicação foram deletadas?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151391490
Dodko (2024-05-16 09:07:19+00:00): Na highway=footway nie je potrebné pridávať foot=yes to vyplýva automaticky, že na chodníku môžu chodiť chodci.
aceman444 (2025-03-21 00:04:23+00:00): Also please do not add bicycle=yes on footways where it is not explicitly allowed to cycle at full speed with the proper traffic sign. On a footway you can take your bike but dismount it or drive with pedestrian speed. You do not need bicycle=yes tag for that.
AmyCupcake (2024-05-16 09:58:12+00:00): https://www.rafales.es/el-pueblo/callejero/ evidencia al contrario.
AmyCupcake (2024-05-16 09:58:56+00:00): Una mapa dibujada por el ayuntamiento donde ponen el nombre en bilingüe
Z_Empty (2024-07-25 17:37:51+00:00): 请不要在不清楚的情况下去绘制，以免产生错误造成困扰，例如您在此变更集中的部分道路
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151391883
Convectional (2024-07-26 02:42:32+00:00): 部分道路编辑来源于卫星底图如有错误还请指正
silversurfer83 (2024-05-16 07:42:20+00:00): Gude :)

ich vermute die Ladestation ist für PKW, oder? Es wäre dann noch sehr interessant zu wissen, welche Stecker dort verbaut sind.

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151392377
silversurfer83 (2024-05-16 07:44:25+00:00): Wieder ich :)

Hi.

Der Name und die Website der Schule sind schon am das Gebäude umfassenden Schulgelände erfasst und sollten entsprechend NICHT noch einmal an das Gebäude. Habe das wieder entfernt. 

happy mapping
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151392688
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-20 04:16:34+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1283536434/history has shop = biryani_shop that was added in this edit
shop=biryani_shop ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop or https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Tag_descriptions_for_key_%22shop%22 fitting? Maybe new value needs to be invented? Maybe this data is wrong and there is no shop here? Maybe it is not a shop but something else?
Sylvain M (2024-08-22 07:28:06+00:00): La piscine du Camping du Gué Saint-Léonard est en rénovation ?
Si oui, il reste encore le noeud du plongeoir [ https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10780225396 ] qu'il faudra peut-être supprimer ?
(je m'intéresse au sujet des plongeoirs, cf. https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/plongeoirs-et-site-de-plongeons-naturels-cliff-diving )
MxxCon (2024-05-20 03:38:01+00:00): Hello.
Please note that this edit will be reverted in full.
OSM is a map of the world NOW, not how it was in the past. There's only a single trace of this railway left crossing Robin Road. Everything else is non-existent and imaginary mapping, which doesn't belong on OSM. You are welcome to map this on OHM.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151393460
aixbrick (2024-05-16 11:24:00+00:00): Hello,
spelling with ´ was correct, please see https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/p/AF1QipPsUdoQ-tam2948fRs9qagwQYZJVaImVkUKKF0V=s680-w680-h510
Regards
VLD523 (2024-05-21 08:35:21+00:00): Hello aixbrick,
thank you for your contribution.
I see the image shows the spelling with apostrophe, but actually that's grammatically wrong (Genitiv S). So, I decided to respect the German grammar rules.
Best
aixbrick (2024-05-21 09:34:11+00:00): You are right, it is a grammatical fault, but in OSM we map what's on the ground. So, if it is not clearly a writing mistake, it should be written like on location and ignoring grammar rules.
aixbrick (2024-05-28 09:51:26+00:00): Changed back with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151935638.
lumixen (2025-09-08 15:54:29+00:00): Привіт!
А Кізка у Демидові все ще розлита як показано на мапі? На знімках ESRI більшість вже виглядає сухою з грунтовими дорогами https://livingatlas.arcgis.com/wayback/#mapCenter=30.31789%2C50.72995%2C16&mode=explore&active=27982
Reibert (2025-09-08 17:56:21+00:00): Привіт, так, розлита.
Frans S (2024-05-18 10:46:41+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
All your changesets are reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Inaccurate mapped.

No buildings squared.

Connected nodes of buildings.

Included yards into mappings

Clustered adjacent buildings.


sExplanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151394005
osmviborg (2024-05-16 08:10:18+00:00): source:maxspeed=sign ?
akimapbuilder (2024-05-16 08:25:29+00:00): Hi! I had to revert your changeset since there is no road in sight.
eggie (2024-05-16 08:10:03+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback   Het is niet nodig om motor_vehicle=destination toe te voegen als er geen doorgaande weg is voor motorvoertuigen.
Wat is het probleem hier. Welk bord staat er vooraan?
Het routeert hier al niet voor motorvoertuigen als doorgaande weg.
Wel nu problemen met moped en mofa.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-05-16 08:19:52+00:00): Beste JLG  Ik heb destination hier weer verwijderd. Dat geeft ook problemen met moped en mofa die als motorvoertuigen worden gezien. 
De wegversmallingen staan al sinds mei 2022 op motor_vehicle=no muv gemotoriseerde tweewielers. Wat is het probleem hier?

Groet
eggie
eggie (2024-05-16 08:36:41+00:00): Kruising met Nieuwe Pieckelaan ook aangepast met motor_vehicle=no muv moped en mofa
JLG_Arts (2024-05-16 08:45:26+00:00): Hallo Eggie,
Dan ligt het aan Magic Earth navigatie want die wil me nog steeds door die straat sturen :-)

groet, JLG Arts
eggie (2024-05-16 08:55:27+00:00): Dag JLG Er zijn meer routers die problemen hebben met een choker en kennelijk ook highway=path die op slot staan voor motor_voertuigen.
Magic Earth hoort die route eigenlijk niet te nemen. Je zou een berichtje kunnen sturen naar die appbouwer. 
Ze negeren highway=path Routeert in de conventie van OSM niet voor motorvoertuigen. Of een choker ook wordt genegeerd met motor_vehicle=no kan ik nu niet beoordelen. 
Na de update van Magic Earth (geen idee hoelang dat duurt)  nogmaals proberen. De Jonkerstraat oostzijde heb ik bij de choker een stukje wegdeel  ook aangepast zodat de routers niet meer routeren daar. Dit maar even om frustratie te voorkomen.
Eigenlijk horen we niet te taggen voor de router. 
Daar zal dan Magic Earth nu ook nog routeren. 
Zie opmerkingen op https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121335343

Groet,
eggie
eggie (2024-05-16 09:04:50+00:00): .. en Magic Earth negeert dus naast highway=path ook gewoon een choker met motor_vehicle=no
Het is nu zo getagd dat het straks niet meer routeert.
kornad (2024-06-04 10:05:27+00:00): Hej, edycja jest błędna - w prawdziwych nazwach tych przystanków nie ma żadnego "(n/ż)". Jest to co najwyżej informacja do zawarcia w opisie obiektu albo prędzej w relacji konkretnych linii autobusowych, do oznaczenia np. jako "platform_on_demand".
Poprawiłem błędne nazwy: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152235947
Jakka (2024-05-16 19:09:52+00:00): er staat hier geen gebouw dus ook geen bedrijf ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11909316652
Belgo IT (2024-05-17 08:43:55+00:00): het bedrijf ligt net achter de parking. als we de pin op bedrijf zetten dan navigeert iedereen langsachter naar het gebouw waar ook geen toegang is.  (er is daar een private weg) en zit iedereen 500 m verkeerd. als de de pin vlak naast de baan zetten dan navigeert men wel goed. hoe moeten we dit anders oplossen?
Jakka (2024-05-17 08:53:41+00:00): Alle bedrijven kantoren kunnen moeilijk op die zelfde locatie hun office plaatsen ;)
Het toevoegen van een highway=service
 access=yes naar/op parking ruimte of rond gebouw/terrein zou een mogelijkheid zijn
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=service
Na toevoegen doet de routeplanners enkele dagen over om uitwerking te zien. Ook andere app moeten dan die update doorvoeren.
Jakka (2024-05-17 09:11:30+00:00): Kleine aanpassing doorgevoerd parking en kantoor in gebouw bij ingang.
ctrl+F5 om wijziging te zien op deze kaart.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11909316652#map=18/51.27249/4.38482&layers=N
Belgo IT (2024-05-17 12:45:33+00:00): Bedankt voor wijziging. nu is er wel issue dat als men navigeert naar nr 9 dat men te vroeg stopt in de straat.
zoals u ziet stopt die voor de spoorweg en de parking oprijden is vlak na de spoorweg. zou dus een 30 m verder in de straat moeten zijn...
Belgo IT (2024-05-21 07:57:13+00:00): bedankt. staat heel goed nu
kornad (2024-06-04 10:05:52+00:00): Hej, edycja jest błędna - w prawdziwych nazwach tych przystanków nie ma żadnego "(n/ż)". Jest to co najwyżej informacja do zawarcia w opisie obiektu albo prędzej w relacji konkretnych linii autobusowych, do oznaczenia np. jako "platform_on_demand".
Poprawiłem błędne nazwy: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152235947
houtari (2024-09-20 00:57:53+00:00): Lisäänpä vielä että minä jatkoin tällä "löydettävyyden teemalla" ja lisäsin vielä building=train_station, niin löytyy myös tuolla tagilla muiden asemarakennusten mukana esim. tällaisella overpass-kyselyllä ... https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1Rc4
MKnight (2025-04-12 19:59:19+00:00): Moin, meiner Erinnerung ist am Ortschild Gera nach wie vor nur backward (auswärts) tempo 100
MKnight (2025-04-12 20:01:51+00:00): Nachtrag: ich meine die Ronneburger Strasse.
MKnight (2025-05-29 17:11:31+00:00): Nochmal geprüft, nein, ist ok so.
osmviborg (2024-05-16 08:23:49+00:00): 👍
CasGroenigen (2024-05-16 11:43:02+00:00): Hi Titlayomi,

I noticed a large part of the buildings you mapped here are not visible on any of the available aerial imageries. 
Are you using any other sources to locate these buildings?

Also, many of the buildings are mapped are smaller than a square meter, it's hard to believe there are so many such small buildings.

Kind regards,

Cas
EneaSuper (2024-05-16 09:47:12+00:00): Ciao, non penso sia necessario inserire la lunghezza della galleria nella denominazione 🙂
GalPaolo981 (2024-05-16 09:56:59+00:00): Per quel tipo ti galleria l'ho ritenuto necessario perché sia la prima all'imbocco della A26 sia la prima (lato mare) si chiamano allo stesso modo e spesso (lavorando nei servizi di emergenza) posso garantire vengono invertite dagli utente della strada
EneaSuper (2024-05-16 10:49:42+00:00): Ah capisco, allora per il momento direi di lasciare così, se vuoi mi confronto con la community nostrana per vedere se si può migliorare la cosa potenziandola, va bene?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:13:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:19:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
Supaplex030 (2024-05-16 12:52:16+00:00): Hallo momabebra, wie schon öfter angemerkt hast du auch hier wieder Bordsteinkanten in falscher Richtung verwendet. Aber leider liest du ja keine CS-Kommentare...
lg, Alex
Drunk501 (2024-05-17 10:31:39+00:00): Hi! These roads were recently demolished (around April 21 to May 4), with a new kerb built along University High Street. I've gone ahead and marked them as demolished after consulting https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Nonexistent_features
kmarkish_lyft (2024-05-20 09:02:30+00:00): Hi,Drunk501! 
My name is Kate, and I’m a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. 
Many thanks for letting me know about it. According to the latest background, Nearmap, that we are used for edits, I didn’t notice any closures and construction works, so I decided to add roads. 
I apologize for that and for any trouble these changes may have caused.
Best regards, Kate
Quaternion (2024-05-17 17:31:32+00:00): Sieht so weit alles gut aus.
MxxCon (2024-05-20 03:41:42+00:00): Hello.
Please note that this edit will be reverted in full. As you have been previously informed, sidewalks and crosswalks do not get street names.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151396467
Allison P (2024-05-20 05:10:16+00:00): Worth noting that some other cities have regional consensus to name sidewalks, so make sure to keep an eye on them if you decide to map elsewhere.
MxxCon (2024-05-20 03:47:46+00:00): Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you delete driveway tag from some of these ways?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151396471
yallasan (2024-05-22 08:07:38+00:00): Hi,
The reason for deleting the driveway tag from some of the ways was because they were initially marked as driveways when they should have been designated as service roads as per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_features#Roads because roads are leading to Apartment Complex.

Regards,
yallasan
ilias_ (2025-03-12 22:53:25+00:00): pas la mettre d'appeler tous les immeubles "immeuble"
ilias_ (2025-03-12 22:53:39+00:00): pas la peine*