piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
aharvey (2025-06-19 02:01:03+00:00): "Transport for NSW" seems to be the more common value https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/operator=Transport%20for%20New%20South%20Wales vs https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/operator=Transport%20for%20NSW

It appears in a bunch of presets so ideally we'd use the same value for network here.
aharvey (2025-06-19 02:02:55+00:00): Although looking at this change are you sure it's correct?

In general I think the preference is to have the network set at a lower level than simply "Transport for NSW". The regional trains are a different network to the metro trains, than to the suburban trans and intercity trains, each should be on their respective network.
lololailo (2025-06-19 11:19:45+00:00): Gracias por el interés que te has tomado en añadir esta información.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167802582
arte2002 (2025-06-20 16:07:13+00:00): Gracias por el apoyo 
He creado un mapa en uMap donde se pueden consultar los datos

https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/es/map/caminos-publicos_1237791

Saludos
lololailo (2025-06-22 07:03:36+00:00): Buena idea lo de hacer un mapa con caminos públicos
Iexist1 (2025-06-19 18:10:20+00:00): Their website says they moved
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:32:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168127729 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:59:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
Supaplex (2025-06-19 02:05:36+00:00): 如同先前留言提醒，要寫上有意義的編輯摘要，敘述做出的變動，而非無意義的文字

FYR
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167804440
Kevin Kofler (2025-06-19 01:44:25+00:00): Address should be Währinger Straße 52. It is correct in the tags, just the commit message was wrong.
chath_tsu (2025-06-19 02:29:53+00:00): (per note 4799320)
Comino (2025-06-19 07:03:05+00:00): Hi Gover Property Management,

In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes".

Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag !
Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead.

For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Merchants

Happy mapping,

Edwin
aharvey (2025-06-19 04:00:49+00:00): > StreetComplete asked me which floor this shop was on, however coming back to it this info appears to be already tagged? I'm not familiar enough with indoor tags to know what's going on here.

We have two tags for floor level, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:level and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:level:ref

level always starts with 0 at the lowest ground level, and is always numeric, -1, 0, 1, ...

level:ref specifies how the level is referenced on signage, lift buttons etc. eg. B1, LG, G, 1, 2, ...

I find level:ref easier to survey and more useful to map as someone looking up what level something is on wants it to match what the signage says and the lift buttons say.

However level is also important for maps to make indoor maps because it gives a consistent ordering, otherwise (especially globally) we can't know the order from level:ref alone.

StreetComplete asks for and tags level and ignores level:ref which has been discussed at https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete/issues/3529 and https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete/issues/1487

Because level always starts with 0 at the lowest ground level, and some buildings use levels like LG, G, 1 you can end up with a situation where you have

level=0, level:ref=LG,
level=1, level:ref=G,
level=2, level:ref=1

And since when surveying a shop it's hard to know which level:ref number corresponds to the lowest ground level it's hard to survey level correctly.
nevw (2025-06-20 03:49:27+00:00): Hi, osmi detects a problem here
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=149.16720&lat=-35.20780&zoom=16 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9592514
nevw (2025-06-22 08:00:27+00:00): This area is not defined properly
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9592514
I am unable to know the bounds in the bottom left corner to fix it.
Can you fix the Gungahlin 792 boundary.
Javierpf (2025-06-19 17:46:51+00:00): Thank you for contributing :-). Your changeset crosses many regions.
In the future, please retain your changeset as smaller (local). Let reviewers and other mappers check your edit more easily. It's impossible (almost) to keep track of the database and changes if changes in huge areas.
So I kindly ask you, when you edit, retain your changeset in a particular smaller area -such as towns- save it first and then move to another area. Examples:
You are adding/modifying 10 objects in 2 distant cities => make 2 changesets, 1 per city.
Why? Have a look at this wiki: osm.wiki/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, and have a nice day. Happy mapping!
jptolosa (2025-06-19 19:29:14+00:00): Hello,
In this changeset you have deleted too many valid objetcs. If there was some duplicated objects you should have fixed only those.
Regards.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167806221
felipeeugenio (2025-06-19 20:08:44+00:00): There was a problem indeed with the upload. Somehow, there were no deletions associated with the numerous segmentations I did with some highways, resulting in the existence of both new segments and the older ones. Still, it was an easy fix and a matter of contacting the maker of the changeset and not triggering a revert and a bad review with no notice or dialog whatsoever.

The revert was reverted, and I am currently working on the duplicates. Sadly, a lot of work was lost, and I am having to redo it.
nevw (2025-06-19 05:49:58+00:00): Hi, when mapping a house, draw the outline accurately of the house itself instead of the block. Pressing Q will square the sides.
b-jazz (2025-06-19 22:08:12+00:00): RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1396492886

First, can you explain why you split the fairway in half like that? You shouldn't be doing this and I've seen a handful of people do this and I'm trying to make sure it never happens again. I'd really like to understand why first.

Second, you shouldn't have your features overlapping like the fairways and the bunkers do in the example above. If you are excluding something like the bunker, you can butt them up against each other and share the boundary nodes, or you can leave a gap between the two, but you do not want to be just crossing them over like you've done. Please correct these. Thanks.
aharvey (2025-06-19 06:08:00+00:00): thanks!

but these two restrictions from/to the same way aren't needed (if they were we'd need them on every single road at an intersection).

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19267503
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19267500

most routers will apply sensible defaults and not request to do a uturn from/to itself via a single node.

where we do need those no u-turns are at traffic lights where the from/to are different ways (eg on a dual carriageway) since some routers will otherwise ask you to u-turn at traffic lights where you can't.

It's probably the iD editors fault those as it shows these same to/from restrictions as being allowed by default but they aren't.
aceman444 (2025-08-14 08:55:54+00:00): Zdravim, preco su vsetky Vase Z-boxy Packety nedostupne pre vozickarov? Bezne su polozene na chodniku a vozickar ma k nim pristup. Ci su ovladacie prvky prilis vysoko?
JeroenHoek (2025-06-19 06:42:53+00:00): Could you have a look at this?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Your comments give no information about what you did.
rarad74 (2025-06-25 14:44:19+00:00): Hi. Please put the name in Romanian language, or at least with roman characters.
silversurfer83 (2025-06-19 18:42:52+00:00): Hi :)

warum löscht du die Grundstückszufahrt und den Parkplatz?

Bei der Firma, die du gelöscht hast, wäre es vielleicht hilfreich gewesen, die Adresse in der Karte zu lassen, da dieser Ort jede einzelne Adresse gebrauchen kann (die kannst du auch gut mit StreetComplete beim Spaziergang erfassen)

Und zu Friedhof und Kirche guck mal bitte hier
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:religion

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167809481
silversurfer83 (2025-06-22 15:58:07+00:00): Weg auf Firmengelände wiederhergestellt
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167965126
Kovoschiz (2025-06-19 10:23:19+00:00): Please don't edit the entire buildings. You don't occupy all of it.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-08-31 13:23:50+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/546954292/history has addr:housename = house that was added in this edit
info that something is built as house goes to building=house, not into address field. Please, help with this cleanup
TrickyFoxy (2025-06-19 11:52:57+00:00): только не копируйте данные со сторонних карт
heretofore (2025-08-23 16:37:25+00:00): I don't think that's how you mark up lines on the ground.
s8evq (2025-06-19 06:49:20+00:00): Adding hammock and benches, public_bookcase
phoenixsaigon1698 (2025-06-23 04:20:25+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments ghi cụ thể ra là làm gì nhé. ;)
Hufkratzer (2025-06-19 23:01:03+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1396508041 is not a horse riding centre (leisure=horse_riding), it is a horse riding arena (probably belonging to https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12925272517 (Les Ecuries Smith-Huet).  In OSM riding arenas are usually tagged with leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:leisure=horse_riding.
Here is an example of another horse riding centre with several arenas: https://www.openstreetmap.org/query?lat=47.458367&lon=-0.486478#map=17/47.458451/-0.486118&layers=P
domiden (2025-06-19 10:05:07+00:00): Should be “… "Murhardstraße" …”
EinKonstanzer (2025-06-21 16:56:04+00:00): Die Änderung zu https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1395808880 ist völliger Murks. Da ist eine Kette die den Weg vom Parkplatz zur B37 versperrt. Ein Durchlass für Fußgänger, Fahrrad, ... gibt es und nicht mehr. Bitte vor Änderungen die Sachen Vorort anschauen. Danke!
pd8JUHyoPJ (2025-06-23 04:58:33+00:00): Danke für die Info - habs korrigiert.
Mapiate (2025-09-10 10:16:24+00:00): Hi, I wanted to make you aware that this changeset added several dozen nodes without any tags. It might be worth reviewing to confirm the changeset saved as expected.
AndreaDp271 (2025-06-19 13:41:53+00:00): too big changeset area
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167811845
AndreaDp271 (2025-06-19 13:42:34+00:00): too big changeset area
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167811959
highflyer74 (2025-09-02 17:25:28+00:00): Hallo! Ich hatte gesehen, dass du hier fleißig warst und Wege gemappt hast. Ich will kurz den Hinweis loswerden, dass an einem =path, der nicht weiter beschildert ist, keine foot=yes oder bicycle=yes nötig ist. Das ist sozusagen die Standardannahme. Weitere Infos dazu findest du hier https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Germany

Viele Grüße!
Gregory Peony (2025-07-06 02:18:15+00:00): you identified buildings in the imagery. Map them slightly smaller than the roof next time. Good job spotting the C shaped building.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167812000
Gregory Peony (2025-07-06 02:19:20+00:00): All buildings valid. Try to map them a little smaller than the roof next time. Good job spoting the C shaped building.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167812000
Gregory Peony (2025-07-06 02:20:27+00:00): (SE) Hold alt to prevent the creation of shared nodes. Press d to disconnect them.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167812000
aharvey (2025-06-19 23:04:34+00:00): Are there freshly painted turn arrows on the ground? Imagery isn't showing any turn arrows painted. Or is there other signage indicating the restrictions?

turn:lanes is only used where there are markings on the ground or other signage implying it. And then it's only used for the section of the way that it applies to.

I've made some tweaks, does it still look ok?
Dan123iel (2025-06-19 23:34:57+00:00): Thank you. I drive this route daily and the arrows have been painted atleast 6 months ago. I will do some study on the non / through / blank on the straight lanes...
aharvey (2025-06-19 23:49:28+00:00): Thanks for confirming.
eggie (2025-06-19 08:32:00+00:00): Welkom bij OSM,

Alleen een naam doet niet in OSM. Ook de aard van het bedrijf toevoegen. 
Voorlopig office=educational_institution toegevoegd met website en phone.

MVG
eggie
aharvey (2025-06-19 22:53:18+00:00): I think on the basis that we mark the additional lane from when it starts, even if it's still to narrow to use at that point, it's okay to say this has 4 lanes total (2 for right turn) even though it only becomes wide enough for two further along).
aharvey (2025-06-19 22:49:01+00:00): Thanks. That's fine, just you had a typo in "slight_right" which I've fixed.
syntex (2025-06-29 17:12:14+00:00): Tylko uważaj następnym razem na dostęp dróg do sieci drogowej - oznaczenie dróg jako construction (52.218337, 20.966113) odcięło dostęp do parkingu Unipark i do całego dworca autobusowego. Powstał nowy łącznik dla autobusów w (52.217087, 20.962155) oraz nowe połączenie dwukierunkowe dla aut osobowych w (52.217535, 20.964024). Poprawiłem w zestawie zmian 168274102.
Anas masuris (2025-06-29 17:21:12+00:00): Faktycznie, masz rację - dlatego też nie zajmuję się głównie drogami xd
bxl-forever (2025-06-19 10:57:50+00:00): Hello, Rowemu,

I understand that adding this tag was inspired after the following thread on the forum.
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/how-to-tag-free-admission-fur-icom-member/131475

The "Any tags you like" policy also mandates that people should make the extra effort to create a proper documentation about new tags they are introducing.

I see on Taginfo that you are currently the sole user of this tag.
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/fee:icom_member#overview

Could I invite you to write a description for this tag on the OSM Wiki.  One important aspect here is that the list of museums for which the ICOM membership cards grants free access, should be publicly available, so that other mappers can also add or remove places in the future.  I tried to inspect https://icom.museum/en/network/membership-card/ but the list of eligible museums does not seem easy to find.

Would you please do this?
Rowemu (2025-06-19 19:11:42+00:00): I'm sorry, you are totally right. I just forgot to document before using the tag. The documentary is now online https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:fee:icom_member
rempshaener (2025-06-19 20:49:15+00:00): Hallo,
zu www.openstreetmap.org/node/12801654261: Hydranten sollten nicht mit Straßen, Gebäuden u.ä. verbunden werden. Das lässt sich leicht beheben: in iD markieren und „E“ drücken – das löst den Hydranten von der Linie.
Viele Grüße
DO3SBA (2025-06-20 07:46:53+00:00): oh danke für den hinweiß
Thorsten2219 (2025-06-23 20:16:56+00:00): Hello wegavision.
Can you please check B19 near Pelhrimov/North, the road is not connected?
Thanks!
wegavision (2025-06-24 07:52:43+00:00): Ja, da fehlte ein Stück, sehr seltsam, ich lösche ja keine Straßen. Vermutlich gab es einen Konflikt, der dann falsch aufgelöst wurde. 
Aber grundsätzlich braucht man bei solchen eindeutigen Fehlern nicht nachzufragen, sondern behebt den Fehler einfach.
VictorIE (2025-11-16 20:26:46+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1396511611/

This is tagged:

footway=sidewalk
highway=footway
name=# Post-Term DH4002 Survey1
eireidium (2025-11-17 20:53:03+00:00): Thanks for catching that - as always - an odd name for a way ;-)
habi (2025-06-19 08:53:31+00:00): https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q55415216 habe ich auch grad noch angepasst.
VLD549 (2025-07-10 14:17:25+00:00): Hi, I was asked to verify name changes. The change from Plus to Maxx Druten is correct. However, the address is Raadhuisstraat 37, as you also indicate.
On the map, it seems to be mapped next to number 51, while 37 is a little south west from it. I am not a mapper, I just wanted to point it out.

Is that something we need to do something about?

Thank you!
Ernie C (2025-07-10 15:44:41+00:00): Ah, I see. I'll delete the other number 37 which is double. 

Thanks.
Chris Fleming (2025-06-20 19:42:49+00:00): It's curious East Coast Cured show the location, show an address of 109/C; The gaurage address isnb 109/C and siuspect this is now East Coast Cured. 

Putting the note on is the right thing to do.. Best option is for someone to survey here and get the correct details. Once we have this the preference is to update the node at the exisrting business rather than have the old node as that way we can easily preservce history
yelisey90 (2025-06-19 09:27:39+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11013825531/history
Actually, BoG terminals usually accept coins. It's a bug that the template suggests payment:coins=no
yelisey90 (2025-06-19 09:27:58+00:00): Have you checked this one in particular?
cubbe8 (2025-06-20 00:37:52+00:00): This is not correct there is no through road
anautiyal_lyft (2025-08-06 11:07:56+00:00): My name is Abhishek and I'm a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft.
Apologies for the delayed response. I understand your concern regarding the through value. Based on the road geometry, there is only one maneuver possible here. We apply turn lanes tags based on signs and markings. In this case, the value was assigned according to the street view imagery dated June, 2025 https://drive.google.com/file/d/1axdUzHFIkwuqsEANip8Izmk0IHCEVdgP/view?usp=sharing. However, my edits here are incorrect as the value “left|left;through” should be accompanied by a “turn:lanes” tag, not a “turn” tag. Thank you for bringing this to my attention. According to our approach, roads with two or more lanes should be tagged with a “turn:lanes” tag. Perhaps a more appropriate value here would be “left|left” or “left|”.

Best regards, Abhishek
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:56:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
Armando Hasanbelliu (2025-06-20 19:35:18+00:00): While I'm glad you did this, I'm not too sure if it was a good idea using this tool.
It would have been better to use official Albanian data on houses, etc.
IrdiIs (2025-06-20 19:40:47+00:00): Which data, that the Albanian government has with an open license can be used to map buildings more accurately than satellite imagery? 

I would really appreciate if you can point me to the data i can use. Thank you!
Armando Hasanbelliu (2025-06-25 18:19:01+00:00): I found this link https://geoportal.asig.gov.al
IrdiIs (2025-06-26 07:41:51+00:00): Their latest building data is from 10 years ago, from 2015. Also, they do not have an open or permissive license to use the data. That is a huge problem because that is data created using public money, and it should be open by default.  Unfortunately, that data is too old and also closed, so it can not be used. Satellite imagery to add building is much more reliable.
Armando Hasanbelliu (2025-06-26 10:50:53+00:00): Yes of course, old data is unreliable, do you think "Instituti i Statistikës" has data which can be imported?
ilias_ (2025-06-19 09:19:41+00:00): Hi there! I was just curious, where do you find these refs? Is this only for stores in Portugal or worldwide?
mikedld (2025-06-19 19:57:38+00:00): If you go to https://www.burgerking.pt/pt/store-locator you'll see the website making a request to https://www.burgerking.pt/api/whitelabel when loading the page, and that endpoint returns the data that contains the refs. In this particular case, there're actually two different refs in the response payload: `_id` and `id` fields (used in URLs, i.e. "https://www.burgerking.pt/pt/store-locator/store/<id>"), and `storeId` and `number` fields (which are the ones that I'm using here); I decided to use the latter as they're always numeric while the former ones come in two forms ("restaurant_XXX" and UUID); I obviously don't know which one is more stable, I guess time will tell.

And yes, since it's burgerking.pt it only applies to Portugal. For Morocco (which is what I assume you're interested in) going to e.g. https://morocco.burgerking.delivery/find-bk seems to make a request to https://api.solo.skylinedynamics.com/locations which returns refs that most probably can't be correlated with the ones from Portugal in any way; I'd love it if there was a global source though (from BK itself). Note that I don't actually know if that's the official website for Morocco :) Also note that sadly there might be legal restrictions on using the rest of the data (just the refs is probably fine?..)
eggie (2025-06-19 10:33:24+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-06-19 10:37:28+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
TrickyFoxy (2025-06-19 21:26:01+00:00): 👋 В правом меню редактора есть кнопка «Настройки фонового изображения». Выберите там спутниковые снимки ESRI — они свежее
Sylabowy Kot (2025-06-19 11:23:05+00:00): Tu była budowa gazociągu. Najwidoczniej już się zakończyła.
Sylabowy Kot (2025-06-19 11:47:34+00:00): I nie przysięgnę, ale jak w przeciągu ostatnich 2 tygodni byłem tam raz, to patrząc na północ od ul. Estrady zdawało mi się, że tam też już skończyli. Niestety nadal, jak się jest np. rowerem, to nie ma innej drogi do pobliskiego wjazdu niż ulicą.
:-} (2025-06-19 11:55:06+00:00): Budowa gazociągu w lesie zakończyła się jakoś na początku tego roku. Jak tylko się pojawiałem w tym lesie to jak było to możliwe starałem się mapować zgodnie z obecnym stanem. Byłem wczoraj i żadne prace nie mają miejsca. Masz rację na północ od Estrady do górki śmieciowej też się nic już nie dzieje. Zaraz podejmę się poprawienia tego obszaru
DomKor (2025-06-19 09:31:55+00:00): Scusate per i tremila changeset sulle stesse cose ma non sono bravissimo a usare le key, e avevo commesso alcuni errori
George Sears (2025-06-19 11:23:32+00:00): Ciao, ma perché construction:highway?
la wiki lo da come errore
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dconstruction#Possible_tagging_mistakes
DomKor (2025-06-20 16:21:35+00:00): in realtà è parzialmetne per una questione di rendering, in questa maniera non dovrebbero apparire (perlomeno in Carto), ma il dato è presente.
DomKor (2025-06-20 16:22:18+00:00): inoltre è più comodo in un secondo momento eliminare la key, dato che i lavori stanno stranamente procedendo in maniera spedita (hanno già terminato tutta l'escavazione)
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-06-26 02:35:04+00:00): Hello!

You used
horse=no-
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/57722559/history

Have you maybe meant
horse=no
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
Oberbergmapper (2025-06-26 09:03:38+00:00): Fixed. Thanks for your hint.
domiden (2025-06-19 11:58:10+00:00): Should be: “Addition and adjustment of …”
FajrAl (2026-06-10 06:27:05+00:00): but, why?
BenjaminMo (2026-06-10 08:06:36+00:00): What do you mean why? 
I've created a route based on my experience to share it with the community.
What is exactly your question?