piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
osmoj (2023-11-22 22:20:51+00:00): Danke Stefan. Ich habe nun fertig aufgeräumt.

Insgesamt gab/gibt es drei Knoten:
1. node/3623144676
Das ist der ursprüngliche Knoten (Massagepraxis Köhler), der schon seit 8 Jahren existiert. Diesen habe ich erhalten, wegen der längeren Änderungshistorie und da die aktuelle Praxis nicht komplett neu ist, sondern nur ein Nachfolger.
Du hattest diesen Knoten erst zugunsten eines neuen Knotens (3. Knoten) entfernt und ich hatte ihn in diesem Änderungssatz wiederhergestellt.
Deine Aktualisierung habe ich hier eingepflegt, plus wheelchair=no, Verwendung des contact:* Schemas und Ergänzung, dass die Praxis am Wochenende und Feiertagen geschlossen ist.

2. node/10154492751 (entfernt)
Dieser Knoten existiert seit einem Jahr für die aktuelle Praxis (Physiotherapie Nicole Berndt). Da er ein Duplikat ist habe ich ihn mit dem 1. Knoten vereint (d.h. dessen Daten übertragen und ihn gelöscht)

3. node/11364065501 (entfernt)
Mit diesem Knoten wolltest du den 1. Knoten ersetzen. In diesem Änderungssatz wurde er wieder entfernt.


Bitte sieh nochmal drüber, ob alles passt und ich nichts übersehen habe.
osmoj (2023-11-22 22:52:27+00:00): Noch ein paar (hoffentlich nicht zu lange) nettgemeinte Hinweise. :D

> Meine letzte Änderung von Gestern war eigentlich ok, aber jetzt ist sie wieder weg.

Ja, die hatte ich mit diesem Änderungssatz rückgängig gemacht.

---

Objekte sollten nicht leichtfertig gelöscht werden, da so auch ihre Änderungshistorie "verloren" geht (Nachvollziehbarkeit und Autorenauflistung). Z.B. können andere die sich jetzt den 1. Knoten ansehen, sehen, dass die Physiotherapie Nicole Berndt ein Nachfolger der Massagepraxis Köhler ist.

---

Das Eintragen von Objekten sollte sich nicht danach richten, wie sie dargestellt (gerendert) werden. Renderer (lese: Webseiten/Apps/etc.) unterscheiden sich zum Teil in den Dingen, die sie anzeigen und wie sie das tun. In OSMand (Android-App) z.B. wird mir die Physiotherapie mit Namen angezeigt im Gegensatz zu openstreetmap.org und manchmal ist auch einfach die Karte noch nicht mit den Änderungen neugerendert worden, d.h. Änderungen sind nicht unbedingt sofort sichtbar.

Ein lesenswerter Wiki-Artikel dazu ist https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice.

Liebe Grüße
DD1GJ (2023-11-23 20:40:16+00:00): Hallo Stefan,

bist du Mitarbeiter der Physiotherapie oder arbeitest Du im Auftrag von MyArtSide Webdesign Seo, https://www.myartside.de/ ?

Viele Grüße, Joachim
Physiotherapie Nicole Berndt (2023-11-23 20:55:50+00:00): Die Inhaberin ist meine Frau. ;)

VG
DD1GJ (2023-11-23 22:56:15+00:00): Hallo Stefan,

OpenStreetMap ist eine umfassende Geodatenbank und jede Kartendarstellung ist ein Kompromiss zwischen Details und Übersichtlichkeit. Man sieht immer nur die Spitze des Eisberges.

https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1DRf

Wenn Du bei obigen Link aus "Ausführen" klickst, siehst Du 85 Physiotherapie-Praxen in Dresden, von denen nur Du und noch ein anderer mit dem Massage-Symbol "geschummelt" haben. Die Mitwirkenden der Qualitätssicherung achten daher im Sinne eines fairen Miteinanders  darauf, dass die korrekten Attribute verwendet werden. Ansonsten würde aus den hochwertigen Geodaten des Projektes sehr schnell eine unbrauchbare Datenmüllhalde werden.

Es gibt unzählige OSM-Karten und Anwendungen. Jeder Ersteller entscheidet selbst, was er wie darstellt und was nicht. Dies sollte akzeptiert werden. 

Viele Grüße, Joachim
ftrebien (2023-11-27 16:03:00+00:00): Limite de velocidade de 10 km/h?
Cleverson Cândido (2023-11-28 19:08:12+00:00): Corrigido o limite.
aTarom (2023-11-22 08:06:19+00:00): Hola gracias por editar, repaso la geometría, y elimino los tags de importación del gpx tipo
> gpx:ele=[en bastantes nodos]
> gpx:name=Carrera a la hora del almuerzo
> gpx:type=running
...
Saludos
michelesalvai (2023-11-24 05:55:53+00:00): muchas gracias por la informacion; creo que lo utilizo poco y non muy correctamente. Tendria que dedicar mas tiempo y estudiar la logica
un saludo
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-11 15:40:42+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/237839942/history has amenity = church that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What you meant by amenity=church? It seem to be not documented value and it seems to be a duplicate of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dplace_of_worship - if you meant christian church then then it is taggable by amenity=place_of_worship religion=christian.
aTarom (2023-11-22 08:22:22+00:00): Hola, puede revisar este nodo, no se exactamente a que se refiere, si es un servicio de alquiler de motos para turistas? "socket"="2"?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11367500923/history
Gracias por editar, saludos
MiMoHo (2023-11-22 09:04:20+00:00): No, it is a shelter with a power outlet for tourists. Since "charging_station" is meant for transport, I included the power supply in the amenity which is a first aid shelter on the walkway.
Tommybara (2024-01-31 02:47:39+00:00): Theo tôi được biết thì nhánh ra bên kia đang vướng mặt bằng còn chưa làm xong, mà bạn cho đoạn này thành 1 chiều thì xe từ Đồng Nai sang muốn quẹo xuống ĐT.746 phải đi đường nào đây bạn?
arjunaraoc (2024-01-02 14:15:56+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).

Check my update to fix minor issues: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145800151

Happy mapping!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144306934
hk51 (2023-11-22 20:48:36+00:00): wieso wurden hier die Objekte

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3775385904/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3775384451/history

gelöscht und wieder neu angelegt ?
Olaf der Mapper (2023-11-22 21:02:21+00:00): Hä wo ist dein Problem? die Objekte existieren nach wie vor!!!

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11367625315
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11367625314

Ich habe schon viele Changesets behandelt, bei denen bestehende Objekte neu angelegt wurden (und das nicht von mir).

LG Olaf
hk51 (2023-11-22 21:43:49+00:00): Du hast hier einfach unnötiger Weise Geschäfte gelöscht und die selben Geschäfte wieder neu eingetragen, dadurch ist die History verloren gegangen, und bei engbers hast Du auch noch wheelchair=yes entfernt, da ist das Problem!
Olaf der Mapper (2023-11-22 22:40:10+00:00): Wenns nur das ist... Hab das wheelchair=yes wieder reingemacht, auch wenn es nun wieder doppelt vorhanden ist.
ftrebien (2023-11-27 14:36:48+00:00): Olá Cleverson. Sua reclassificação foi desfeita por outro mapeador por não seguir a regra de classificação adotada por consenso tanto pela comunidade do RS quanto pela brasileira. As estradas que você marcou como importantes não são rotas principais entre cidades com mais de 200 mil habitantes, mas são entre cidades com mais de 20 mil habitantes, e por isso devem ser primárias, não troncais. Peço também que, ao fazer modificações controversas como esta, explique no comentário da alteração o que foi feito e por quê. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brazil/Classifica%C3%A7%C3%A3o_das_rodovias_do_Brasil
ftrebien (2023-11-27 14:44:37+00:00): Além disso, ao fazer correções na classificação, não deixe lacunas na malha. Promover os trechos intermediários sem promover junto as travessias urbanas (por qualquer que seja a razão) deixa a malha fragmentada e torna o mapa ilegível e pouco profissional (compare com os mapas comerciais). Procure pensar no sistema viário intermunicipal como rotas ligando nodos viários.
hk51 (2023-11-22 20:28:25+00:00): wieso wurden die Objekte

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6801119137/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10967209965/history

verschoben und mit Fantasienamen versehen ? Und dann die richtigen wieder mit

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11367617048/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11367617040/history

neu angelegt ?
Olaf der Mapper (2023-11-22 20:46:52+00:00): Hallo, das Blühende Barock in Ludwigsburg ist ein Märchengarten für Kinder. Der Fantasie sind hierbei keine Grenzen gesetzt. LG Olaf
hk51 (2023-11-22 21:43:01+00:00): Deine Fantasieobjekte haben nichts in OSM zu suchen, hier kommt nur die Realität rein
Olaf der Mapper (2023-11-22 22:35:58+00:00): Tja, da muss ich dich wohl enttäuschen. Es existieren nämlich gar kein Sterntaler, ein Goldstücke speiender Esel oder ein Froschkönig - Das sind alles ausgedachte Märchen der Gebrüder Grimm, die nichts mit der Realität zu tun haben!

Streng genommen müsstest du daher mit deiner taffen Aussage den Märchengarten im BlüBa löschen.  :-)
Baloo Uriza (2023-11-22 13:25:08+00:00): A building made up of right angles and rectangles should be a pretty easy draw...
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144307851
MxxCon (2023-11-22 04:21:02+00:00): Hello.
You added name:en=Walgreens, but this feature already has name=Rite Aid tag. This seems like a contradiction. So what is it? Walgreens or Rite Aid?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144307917
compilation-error (2023-11-22 04:31:27+00:00): This is now a Walgreens. RiteAid at this location closed a few years ago.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144307917
clambake92115 (2023-12-08 22:06:48+00:00): Upper Hillside is accessible by bicycle. Can you revert this change?
MxxCon (2023-11-22 04:23:14+00:00): Hello.
This feature already has name=Zen Salon, but you added name:en=Zenisalon. Which name is the correct one?
What is the source of this data?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144307975
compilation-error (2023-11-22 04:35:19+00:00): The correct name is Zenisalon Nail & Spa. see: https://www.yelp.com/biz/zenisalon-nail-and-spa-hoboken
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144307975
MxxCon (2023-11-22 04:44:38+00:00): Please note that you can NOT use Yelp to add data to OSM! Data on Yelp is copyrighted to Yelp and not compatible with OSM's license. It is copyright violation to use Yelp. You are breaking ToS with both Yelp and OSM.
MxxCon (2023-11-22 04:46:27+00:00): Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#Why_don't_you_just_use_Google_Maps/whoever_for_your_data?
While that article talks about Google Maps specifically, this also applies to all other copyrighted sources which did not give explicit permission to OSM to use their data.
compilation-error (2023-11-22 05:07:05+00:00): Understood. Apologies for that. This is however local knowledge - I only used the yelp link to provide an easy to use reference to the original query. Please feel free to discard the edit.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144307975
tastrax (2023-11-23 10:56:06+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
mf8s003j (2023-11-22 03:56:03+00:00): I see that you added review_requested. This change looks good to me! Great speed and accuracy.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144308228
mf8s003j (2023-11-22 03:56:37+00:00): Great change! Beat me to it. :D
Airfall (2023-11-23 15:11:57+00:00): Thanks! Sorry to poach that edit from you!
Kovoschiz (2023-11-27 18:53:26+00:00): Please don't follow others blindly. This is the unpaid area only. The station box with the tracks and platforms are under Man Cheung St. Separate area should be created to distinguish them.
galen8183 (2025-02-07 18:31:23+00:00): Hi, one of these bike racks was placed in the middle of a car park, but is tagged as wall loops and nothing is visible on aerial imagery. Could you confirm where this is meant to be placed? Thanks!
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11367654146
fortera_au (2023-11-22 07:35:47+00:00): Hi there, the imagery you've used does not show tram lines where you've mentioned, are you able to let me know where these are sourced from? You've mentioned that these are former tram lines, and they appear to no longer exist in any form, so they shouldn't be mapped.
Supt_of_Printing (2023-11-22 12:10:54+00:00): Hi. 
First of all, the option for mapping razed railways exists on OpenStreetMaps; if this shouldn't be done, the option shouldn't be there in the first place. But it is there, so can be mapped.
Secondly, many such closed and razed tramlines are mapped in European cities, so why not here?
Thirdly, the mapping of disused, abandoned and razed railways and tramways is a resource for people interested in them and is depicted as an overlay in OpenRailwayMaps, but is not depicted in OpenStreetMaps and therefore does not add any confusion to people only utilising OpenStreetMaps.
As for the sources, there is plenty of data available for the former tram routes which I have used as well as my own personal knowledge of when they were still open.
I hope this helps. Regards, Supt.
fortera_au (2023-11-22 12:22:26+00:00): Razed is generally used for when there is some kind of remaining track of some sort showing where the tram line is, or if mapping is out of date to what's in real life and still shows the track. If the tram track no longer exists, it should be deleted. If OpenRailwayMap needs that information, they'd need to consider a combination of data from OSM and from another source like OpenHistoryMap.
fortera_au (2023-11-22 12:23:15+00:00): Plus, how it renders here is not how every other renderer will render. osm.org is designed for mappers, not for map viewers.
woodpeck (2023-11-22 13:28:26+00:00): Dear Supt_of_Printing, please cease any mapping of razed railway infrastructure immediately. It is true that it happens on OSM occasionally but even in Europe it is a very divisive issue disliked by most mappers and only ever tolerated if clear visual cues of razed railways exist. It is never acceptable to map something because "it is known that it used to be there".

Both your lines of reasoning, "it is being done elsewhere so why not here" and "it is possible in OSM hence it must be allowed else it would not be possible" are flawed.

Regarding the first, a lot of bullshit is being added to OSM everywhere every day. This doesn't mean that adding bullshit is to be encouraged. 

Regarding the second, OSM's technical model is theoretically able to accept any kind of object - you could map clouds, for example. That doesn't mean it makes sense or is desirable. Even if someone were to create a preset for an editor to map clouds, that would still not be acceptable to the community.

I have removed the razed railways added by you recently. Please stick to mapping things that verifiably exist.

This has been written in my capacity as a DWG member, and the issue is tracked at DWG Ticket#2023112210000126.
pantufla (2024-10-19 23:43:45+00:00): Qué son estos puntos?
Matt_ (2023-11-22 03:52:29+00:00): Please see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/US_National_Inventory_of_Dams
Matt_ (2023-11-22 03:56:26+00:00): And also: https://maproulette.org/browse/challenges/42377
Frank Peng (2026-01-07 02:38:20+00:00): If you can take the time to leave better changeset comments (what did you change and why), then it will be easier for other mappers to understand what you have done and why. "NA" is not considered a good changeset comment.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Could you explain what you did in this changeset (I'm not trying to say it's bad. Mostly just curious)? Thanks.
Black_Diamond (2023-11-25 17:02:51+00:00): The change to New Concept Academy was trying to resolve several issues. Though after reviewing the business license for New Concept Academy at <https://www.cupertino.org/aca>, it's possible that this business no longer exists. The license expired last year. I recommend confirming that New Concept Academy still exists. The company is a registered business in Sunnyvale, and it goes by only "New Concept Academy" instead of any other localized name.
Black_Diamond (2023-12-02 22:27:16+00:00): I left the multilingual names for the New Concept Academy for the main office, but I refined the academy information in this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144705679

The website says that it's located in suite 215.  I visited the site, and it contains 3 rooms according to the doors, and 215 seems to be the main office.  The other rooms were changed to classrooms with a relationship to the New Concept Academy campus (the collection of rooms).
EvanSiroky (2023-11-29 06:17:01+00:00): Hey there! I'm a local mapper from Scotts Valley, California. I see that you requested a review of this changeset, so I'm giving it a review.

I see that you added what appears to be your personal business to the map. This does raise some privacy concerns for yourself, but since you also appear to list this address on your website, perhaps it is intentional and something you are ok with. If you have a dedicated office or suite at another location, it may be more appropriate to add the business at that location instead.

I also see that you have used the editor built-in to the OpenStreetMap website. I believe you may have entered in a lot of correct information in the "Feature Type" and "Fields" sections, but then directly edited the values in the "Tags" section to make more sense to a human. I'd highly recommend trying to use only the first two sections of the feature editor and not use the "Tags" directly if you're just starting out with OpenStreetMap. The "Tags" each have a special meaning and are mainly meant to be read by computers. Fortunately, it looks like another mapper has already corrected most of these things for you.

Happy mapping!
Supaplex (2023-11-22 09:30:08+00:00): 可以修改既有形狀，擴大範圍。而非整個刪除重畫
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144310238
LKAsahi (2023-11-30 08:38:56+00:00): 您好，會選擇刪除重畫是因為我想將物件輪廓形狀畫的精準一點，例如直角、圓弧等都想盡量對正。
但我對JOSM不太熟悉，操作上好像沒有其他向量繪圖軟體常見的功能（例如多邊形可以相加，但不能相減？），導致要將既有形狀修正，比起刪除重畫來說麻煩很多，所以才會如此操作。
Dr Kludge (2023-12-21 03:32:45+00:00): I do not understand why you remove the address that just needs the house number?  I added these address components in preparation for when the house number became available. I wound up adding the address back along with the house number for a number of your removal changes.  Please stop removing this data.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/847818538/history
watmildon (2023-12-21 04:03:50+00:00): Hello! The specific way in question should have had the tags left on it and was erroneously cleaned up by me. My apologies.

However, to my understanding, the vast majority of my address tag removals are in line with common practice throughout the United States. The addr:country tag is completely unnecessary and should not be added. Another oddity I often correct is, buildings in a city that are not addressable and yet have address tagging. This one is a great example (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/847835130/history#map=19/33.61513/-112.08768). It appears to be a minor out building or shelter of some kind. Can you help me understand why these two practices are necessary in these cases?
watmildon (2023-12-21 04:18:33+00:00): I posted a few more thoughts over on the community forum. I hope we can reach a consensus one way or another.

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/questions-about-address-tagging-common-practices/107278
watmildon (2023-12-22 22:03:14+00:00): Hello! Would love to have your input about things in the community thread.
MxxCon (2023-11-23 05:55:00+00:00): Hello.
In addition to adding disused:shop= tag, you supposed to also remove shop= tag.
But also if this is now a pet food store, you can just directly tag it as such.
The point of disused:shop= tag is if that location is vacant.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144310328
MxxCon (2023-11-23 05:56:08+00:00): Hello.
This is incorrectly tagged. This POI is not a shop but a leisure=fitness_centre, so it should be tagged as disused:leisure=fitness_centre.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144310337
MxxCon (2023-11-23 05:59:44+00:00): Hello.
If these buildings are under construction, they should be tagged as such.
Also when you are mapping features that supposed to have right angles, you can right-click on such a feature and select "Make Square". Doing that not only makes your mapping look neater, but also aligns the feature closer to the real world.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144310517
citrula (2023-11-24 04:32:44+00:00): This changeset has made it so that part of Lake Texoma is covered in wood - if you want to add wood landcover, you should probably manually draw it, since there are many areas within the boundary which are not tree-covered.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144310634
MxxCon (2023-11-23 06:24:18+00:00): Should "proposed" features even be mapped? It's just plans and talks and stuff. Once shovel hits the ground then we have something to map..Until then what's the point of mapping something that might not even exist at all.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144310802
zhik (2023-11-23 16:35:09+00:00): I get want you are saying, but I do believe that it is 99% going to happen and just waiting the rubber stamp. The site has been cleared for years  specifically for this purpose.

Also I found it convenient to map since they exist in the same reference document. the proposed key was to hide it from rendering until they officially approve it early next year (with some slight modifications).

I will remove 1225829612 and 1225829613 since that is not a done deal.
MxxCon (2023-11-23 06:27:31+00:00): Hello.
Please note that "town_house" is not a valid value for the house= tag. The correct value is "terraced" as documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:house%3Dterraced
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144311029
aceman444 (2024-03-17 23:31:45+00:00): No konecne zmysluplna oprava. Dakujem.
Supaplex (2023-11-22 08:49:57+00:00): 可以修改既有的道路線條或是建築外框，不用整個刪除重畫
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144311311
aceman444 (2024-04-28 20:39:33+00:00): Vam to asi nestaci povedat raz? Preco to zase bez vysvetlenia vraciate naspat?
mcliquid (2023-11-22 07:53:16+00:00): Hi,

just a general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!