piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2024-09-18 19:29:41+00:00): Please don't change highway=path to highway=cycleway. It's an alternative tagging scheme preferred by many cycling infrastructure mappers.

More information
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mapping-cycleways-in-estonia/104894
lnagel (2024-09-20 15:14:13+00:00): I was just using iD editor defaults and it seems your preferences are simply different. Not much discussion on the community thread and I don't have preference really as long as routing isn't broken. My edits fixed the routing issues, so I hope they don't come back now.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2024-09-20 15:43:45+00:00): If there were routing issues related to having highway=path instead of highway=cycleway, please contact the developer of the router, it's clearly a bug.

There is not much discussion under the thread because Estonian community isn't very active. There were quite a lot discussions in changeset comments before I've created it. If you don't agree, you can post in that thread.

The way of using highway=path is documented in the wiki and is actually used in many countries in practice, some of which even changed iD Editor's default.

For example, Vespucci editor uses highway=path, if I remember right.


But anyway, I think that the main thing is that we don't change this back-and-forth in a useless edit war.
lnagel (2024-09-20 15:50:57+00:00): I don't mind either way, as long as the editor supports this scheme with reasonable defaults. Otherwise you will just be fighting the results all the time, exactly like this thread here.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2024-09-20 15:56:58+00:00): Changing the default in iD would result in people starting to change highway=cycleway into highway=path. With two schemes I think the best thing is to just bring awareness of them.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2024-09-18 19:10:35+00:00): Hi, please don't change paths designated to bicycles to 
highway=footway.

Also, keep in mind that foot traffic must use a separate tag from oneway, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:foot:backward and such your change is not really necessary.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2024-09-18 19:39:57+00:00): You didn't even put oneway:bicycle=yes in all places you've removed oneway from. Please be more diligent.
ika-chan! (2024-06-17 10:00:46+00:00): Changesets 152465280, 152748257, 152411040 and 152418713 were reverted because it replaced ways with lower quality versions. I will do the repairs to the area shortly.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2024-09-18 20:13:25+00:00): It was already connected.

I'm not against this way of connecting it, but here is a leftover which should be removed. 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/956393160#map=21/59.4403325/24.7535226&layers=C

Please check things first with CyclOSM or OpenCycleMap, they help a lot in understanding what's mapped.
lnagel (2024-09-20 15:19:48+00:00): Removed leftover
NorthCrab_upload (2024-06-16 08:00:31+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11984980238

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Sycholic (2024-06-16 08:35:54+00:00): Note: forgot to mark changed made due to 'local knowledge'
nevw (2024-06-16 10:21:37+00:00): Hi, can you explain more about the project with a start and end point poi and why you have added it to osm.
nevw (2024-06-17 06:12:27+00:00): Hi, I decided to delete this as I expect it was not meant to be be added to OSM public map and was instead some private markers.
For marking meeting places, bush walking points, plotting your track to upload to gps or phone you can use something like https://www.alltrails.com/explore/map/new or use https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-31 18:09:36+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11985015751/history has fixme:type = shop that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What kind of shop is here?

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop for common values - is any of them fitting?
vogelfreier (2024-06-17 15:27:31+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4664980344 mein Änderungssatz besagt hoffentlich wer hier bei uns in der Region die Entsorger sind, sicherlich wird die EBE bei Dir im Keller/Durchfahrt stehn blau und schwarz
marc__marc (2024-08-05 20:43:13+00:00): Bonjour,
je pense que la confusion des ref vient peut-être du fait que la boirne était Alten au départ et qu'ensuite elle est passsé en Electra... alors que ce n'est peut-être pas la même borne dans la réalitée.
Par ailleurs ref est une ref locale (style 1 2 3), pas un recopiage de ref:EU:EVSE
Pour finir, je te conseille de remplacer source=survey par survey:date=AAAA-MM avec la date de la dernière vue de la bonre, cela aide à détecter les objets plus vu sur le terrain depuis longtemps
Cordialement,
Marc
Agaric (2024-08-05 21:24:25+00:00): OK.
J'ai ajouté pour survey:date et comme hier j'ai vu qu'une troisième borne avait été ajouté (mais pas encore fonctionnelle).
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154869132#map=19/45.74655/-0.67688

Cordialement
akimapbuilder (2024-06-17 07:11:17+00:00): Hi! I had to revert your changeset since the building you added overlaps with an already existing building.
literan (2024-06-16 10:28:33+00:00): не надо пихать слово "деревня"
dadavid (2024-06-17 10:51:21+00:00): moin Eugenmollenknolle :) 

vielen Dank für deine Bearbeitungen hier :) 
Eine kleine Anmerkung zu diesem Weg hier [1]. Den name=Sackweg habe ich entfernt, da es eine Beschreibung und kein Straßenname ist, schau gern dazu auch ins Wiki [2]. Stattdessen kannst du dort zum Beispiel den Tag noexit=yes [3] eintragen. 

Viele Grüße und viel Spass beim mappen weiterhin :) 

David

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/290459829/history

[2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:name#Verwendung

[3] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:noexit%3Dyes
Eugenmollenknolle (2024-06-17 13:46:19+00:00): Servus David,

danke für die Korrektur :) 
noexit =yes passt auch nicht, da der Weg in einen kleinen Trampelpfad übergeht und nicht komplett endet, oder? :D

Viele Grüße
literan (2024-06-16 10:26:59+00:00): неверный формат адрески
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-31 18:09:27+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11985056678/history has fixme:type = shop that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What kind of shop is here?

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop for common values - is any of them fitting?
empty_child (2024-06-16 18:25:29+00:00): Hello
Could you send pic links? Because on all sats images it's a farmland
Jan Olieslagers (2024-06-16 18:39:47+00:00): From a source we are supposed to avoid using :)
https://www.google.com/maps/place/Pskhu+Airport/@43.3853853,40.8160407,3a,75y,90t/data=!3m8!1e2!3m6!1sAF1QipMDpbpTX_e81i9RLZHwfms6bt21S36cZugDExH7!2e10!3e12!6shttps:%2F%2Flh5.googleusercontent.com%2Fp%2FAF1QipMDpbpTX_e81i9RLZHwfms6bt21S36cZugDExH7%3Dw203-h152-k-no!7i4000!8i3000!4m7!3m6!1s0x405f52ee275edbab:0x749aa5a6f2d0b4a9!8m2!3d43.3853853!4d40.8160407!10e5!16s%2Fg%2F1214gcnr?entry=ttu
Mind you, the date in the picture could have been faked, I have no way to detect or verify that.
Kind regards!
empty_child (2024-06-16 18:51:49+00:00): Frankly, I don't think that it's a sign of the airport opening. It's AN-2 "Kukuruznik" which can land on any plain (optional) surface. It's enough for this model)
Jan Olieslagers (2024-06-16 18:57:34+00:00): Aerodrome [ICAO, Annex 14] A defined area on land or water (including any buildings,
installations and equipment) intended to be used either wholly or in part for the arrival,
departure and surface movement of aircraft.
empty_child (2024-06-16 19:01:33+00:00): Referring to this document, any farmland meets these parameters)
And ICAO rejected code from this aerofield
Jan Olieslagers (2024-06-16 19:05:38+00:00): What code? I am only aware of code "ZC96" and that is from a non-official source, https://maps.aopa.ru The field does not have an ICAO code, as far as I can see, nor does it need one.
Jan Olieslagers (2024-06-16 19:06:44+00:00): And no, not all farmland is INTENDED to be used for aircraft movements.
empty_child (2024-06-16 19:15:05+00:00): Man, no offense, but we have a list of places that were intended to be used as aerofields. But it's not an argument to change their status on "active"
This (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1244631614) looks like working. Even some sats show planes on aerofield. 
But this (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/79626211) - no. It can be used. In extreme conditions. But it's a disused aerofield. And I don't see a point to mark it as active
The same logic is for this aerofield. It's unused. There are no regular flights there. And I don't see even parts of the runway
Jan Olieslagers (2024-06-16 19:27:58+00:00): I give up. Have it your own way and please stop whining.
Jan Olieslagers (2024-06-16 20:15:31+00:00): And, err, I hope you are aware that, according to your very personal and somewhat unusual criteria, there are several hundred aerodromes in Russia that should be tagged as disused? Go ahead! Do not care what others say, YOU are right! No discussion!
literan (2024-06-16 10:26:29+00:00): котт. поселок это не населенный пункт, не надо ставить в тег addr:city его название
silversurfer83 (2024-06-16 09:58:34+00:00): Gude :)

kleiner Hinweis: Die Öffnungszeiten sollten ein ganz bestimmtes Format haben, damit die verschiedenen Apps eine Chance haben, sie vielleicht auszuwerten:

https://projets.pavie.info/yohours/
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours

cheers
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152750895
bxl-forever (2024-06-17 13:25:32+00:00): Bonjour,

Voici, comme demandé, un avis sur les modifications.  Ce sera un peu général, car les 10 changesets des derniers jours ont un peu les mêmes problèmes.

1) Oui, c'est bien d'avoir ajouté des détails, comme la hauteur des bâtiments ou les haies, ou tous les détails dans La Roseraie.

2) Pour les bâtiments, on en a déjà parlé, ne plus toucher aux contours et surtout ne jamais effacer des bâtiments qui ont des codes (adresses et/ou ref:UrbIS).  En principe, tout a été réparé à présent.  Le tutoriel de iD montre uniquement comment faire des dessins, ce n'est pas spécifique à la Belgique, c'est pour ça qu'il ne dit pas où trouver les bons fonds de plan.
Les barrières ou les haies sont normalement aussi alignées sur les limites des propriétés (you normally say "cadastre"), ça peut se voir sur les couches UrbisAdm pour être plus correct que sur photo aérienne, qui est désaxée chaque année d'une manière différente.

3) Pour les bâtiments en relief comme ici : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1292806308/history
Globalement ça va mais il manquait des tags.
La modélisation 3D dans OSM, c'est vraiment compliqué. Peut-être attendre d'un peu plus d'expérience sur OSM avant de faire plus.
Pour faire simple, on doit dire à la carte : il y a un bâtiment de 6 étages et un bâtiment de 1 étage, ça se fait comme suit : le bâtiment de base a building_levels=6, et l'autre bâtiment a building_levels=7 + building_min_level=6 → le rendering 3D est alors correct car il dessinera le toit comme un seul étage au-dessus.  Exemple de documentation ici https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_3D_Buildings
Juste confirmation pour être sûr : dans OSM le nombre d'étages inclut le rez-de chaussée, donc rez+5 étages est codé comme building_levels=6.

4) Aussi adapté des choses dans La Roseraie.  Certaines voies ont été mises en voies de service (highway=service) car il y a des véhicules qui viennent ici pour livrer, sinon globalement ça va. Peut-être c'est bien d'ouvrir dans l'éditeur et de regarder les tags sur certains endroits pour voir comment c'est à présent.
enudel (2024-06-17 20:28:20+00:00): Super, Merci ! Je regarde à ça tout de suite.
AndersAndersson (2024-06-16 20:25:11+00:00): Hej!
Att feltagga för att den ska synas hos valfri renderare är inte en bra sak.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
Trilobyte (2024-06-18 13:53:28+00:00): Tack för kommentaren. Jag är nybörjare med Openstreetmap faktist. Kan du tipsa om hur man taggar det på rätt sätt? Den här platsen är ganska populär i K., nästan alla besökare åker dit (tourism=attraction), på grund av den underbara utsikten (tourism=viewpoint). Hur kombinerar man de här två taggarna? Tack!
AndersAndersson (2024-06-18 23:27:23+00:00): För en utsiktsplats är tourim=viewpoint tillräckligt.
Annars skulle man sätta tourism=attraction på allt som kunde vara intressant för turister. T.ex. en vandringsled, en affär, en sjö o.s.v.

Hur andra renderare och appar väljer att visa det är inget som ska påverka taggningen.

Välkommen till OSM! Hoppas du fortsätter att lägga in bra saker där du har lokalkännedom.
Sycholic (2024-06-16 09:08:10+00:00): changed this due to personal knowledge,  going uphill from the intersection does not allow turns into business parking lot.
elsy1 (2024-06-16 16:15:09+00:00): درود لطفا در ویرایش خود دقت بیشتری بفرمایید به بلوار خمینی تگ آزادراه دادید تشکر
elsy1 (2024-06-16 16:16:54+00:00): درود لطفا قبل از ویرایش از کافی بودن دانش خود در رابطه با نحوه ویرایش و باقی موارد مطمئن شوید  تمام ویرایش  های شما غلط هستند
Lezurex (2024-06-16 16:46:44+00:00): Hallo Mister Kanister,

Halbe Stockwerke gibt es nicht, oder zumindest kann ich mir nicht vorstellen, wie ein solches genau aussehen soll ;D

Bitte benutze den height-Key, um die Höhe anzugeben. building:levels ist wirklich für die Anzahl Stockwerke gedacht, egal wie hoch ein Stockwerk nun sein mag.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1292812527
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:height
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:levels#Values

LG Lezurex
Mister Kanister (2024-06-17 09:25:03+00:00): Hi Lezurex,

da hast du natürlich Recht, mea culpa – https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152793168
village (2024-06-19 06:36:15+00:00): sind diese Fahrradbübgel https://osm.org/node/11909642945 öffentlich zugänglich?
literan (2024-06-26 17:26:14+00:00): что за фейк?
bxl-forever (2024-06-16 10:15:55+00:00): Bonjour,

Un conseil svp : écrire un résumé correct des changements.  Ne pas écrire des textes comme « Précisions » ou « Mise à jour » car ça n’apporte aucune information sur ce que vous avez vraiment changé.  Nous allons essayer d’analyser vos changements pour donner un retour.
InsertUser (2024-06-16 21:40:44+00:00): Well, yeah, if you want to spell it correctly. Sheesh, you'd think these things were going to be interpreted by a computer or something...

Thanks.
Vivek Dumre (2024-06-17 06:17:06+00:00): Good mapping with a changeset comment.#OMGuru
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152753109
maro21 (2024-06-18 21:20:26+00:00): Powstał tam budynek? Na zdjęciach nie widać.
black_flag_baby (2024-06-19 06:07:52+00:00): Z tego co pamiętam, to postawili 2 kontenery i w jednym chyba mają jakieś biuro.
maro21 (2024-06-19 21:13:35+00:00): Chodzi mi o to, że zmieniłeś parking w budynek.
black_flag_baby (2024-06-20 06:32:25+00:00): Faktycznie, dzięki za zwrócenie uwagi. Poprawiłem na teren handlu detalicznego i komis dodałem osobno jako punkt:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1183358668
hauke-stieler (2024-06-16 19:42:06+00:00): Nicht wundern, habe Teile der Änderungen hier rückgängig gemacht. Ist etwas verworren gerade.

Hier hat jemand (s. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152067936) wild angeblich inoffizielle Wege gelöscht. Du hast den am Hasselbrack wieder neu eingezeichnet, aber ungefähr zeitgleich mit einem revert der komischen Changesets von der verlinkten Person. Dadurch gab es hier einen Weg doppelt. Das habe ich gerade korrigiert.

Falls dir nochmal auffallen sollte, dass Wege einfach so verschwunden sind, schau mal, ob wer hier was löscht. Wenn du nichts findet und dir sicher bist, dass ein Weg verschwunden ist, dann schreib mich (oder die OSM-HH Mailingliste) gerne an.
Jörg Roßdeutscher (2024-06-17 06:21:19+00:00): Hallo, aaah, das erklärt, warum „meine App kaputt ist“ — ich bin da gestern lang, habe den zuhause noch „fehlenden“ Weg neu eingezeichen, zuhause die Doppelung bemerkt und einen wieder gelöscht. Du auch. :-) 

Am besten gucken wir einfach mal, was (auch im Kontext der aktuellen Revert-Welle) davon übrig bleibt.

Die anderen verdächtigen Sackgassen hatte ich auch gesehen, aber ich war mit anderen Leute da und wollte nicht jeden Seitenweg ablaufen. Erstmal routen die Wanderapps jetzt wieder über Hamburg höchsten Berg, den Rest kann man nachtragen. Jetzt wo man's weiss.

Danke für deine Nachricht!
NorthCrab_upload (2024-06-16 10:40:54+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1292819094

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2024-06-16 10:40:53+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1292819070

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2024-06-16 10:40:52+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1292819008

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2024-06-16 10:40:51+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1292818967

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
literan (2024-06-17 17:21:28+00:00): не надо писать слово "деревня" в тег addr:city (этот тег вообще лишний, можете его не заполнять)
Eleanor777 (2024-06-18 07:36:29+00:00): Спасибо, не буду писать это тег
Nathan_A_RF (2024-06-16 18:11:43+00:00): The access tags were correct here before, verified personally. I am reverting this.
SomeoneElse (2024-06-26 10:40:54+00:00): Hello,
What is "busmiles.uk"?
Best Regards,
Andy
silversurfer83 (2024-06-17 01:03:25+00:00): Hallo :)

eine kleine Bitte: Du hast hier (und auch vorher schon) in einem Rutsch Dinge an zwei sehr weit auseinanderliegenden Orten geändert. Das ist zwar nicht verboten, es macht aber allen, die sich hier bei OSM mit der Qualitätssicherung beschäftigen, die Arbeit unnötig schwer. Daher möchte ich dich bitten, in Zukunft darauf zu achten deine Änderungen lokaler zu halten und zu speichern, bevor du die nächste Ecke des Landes bearbeitest. Danke :)

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152755457
CycleStreets (2024-06-26 09:21:33+00:00): Way 1292824574 should be removed because the cycleway along Huntingdon Road is more correctly modelled by the cycleway=track or cycleway=lane properites of the highway=primary. Cyclists riding on the cycleway on Huntingdon Road do not have to give way when passing side roads, which is one of the main reasons why the cycleway is part of the road, not a separate way.
discoflea (2024-07-17 09:40:16+00:00): ok thanks for the comment, ill revert this changeset
Filip009 (2024-06-18 05:22:03+00:00): Zdravím, highway=rest_area neboli "Odpočívadlo" sa používa na odpočívadlá pri diaľniciach. Tu odporúčam skorej pridať nejaký prístrešok, alebo to nastaviť ako leisure=picnic_site.
JHocek (2024-06-18 07:51:09+00:00): děkuji za upozornění, opravil jsem. JH
Filip009 (2024-06-18 09:25:40+00:00): hiking=rest_area sa nepoužíva https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:hiking

Pokiaľ si nie ste niektorými tagmi istý, pozrite si wiki, že kedy sa ako daný tag používa.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2024-09-18 19:21:15+00:00): Hi, there is no such thing in Estonian traffic law. I'll rollback this change.
lnagel (2024-09-20 15:09:38+00:00): While you are right about the law, then the reality on these roads says otherwise. Most people prefer the dedicated bike paths here since they are much safer. Car roads have almost no space for bikes here in Viimsi. I was only adding this tag to prevent the routing from placing me on the car road every time. I have personally spent quite a bit of effort to fix the routing issues during this summer and I would hate it to see it broken again.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2024-09-20 15:34:38+00:00): Please contact the developer of the router if you think that it's not working properly. OSM is about data and access tags are about legal restrictions.

Routing through carriageway should not be forbidden for those who want to use it. It's up to the people to decide where it's safer. Someone may not want to be near kids at 40+ km/h or reduce his speed to a pedestrian speed at every crossing (required by law) or maybe taking the curbs aren't really comfortable on his bike. If a car fits on the road then a bike fits too. There is no such thing as a "car road" in road traffic act.

For example, brouter has different profiles to accommodate different cyclists. It's up to router and the user to make the decision. See how it takes bicycle-pedestrian path with Safety profile https://brouter.m11n.de/#map=14/59.5262/24.8634/standard,route-quality&lonlats=24.837491,59.515656;24.90476,59.504387&profile=safety

Personal example: I usually don't bike fast, but here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/204921428 
when going downhill I always take the carriageway since I have quite a high speed and the sidepath has people walking, drivers pulling out from private houses not expecting anyone fast, there is also a non-see-through fence at the end restricting visibility before crossing which is dangerous if you're cycling fast, as drivers pull out from Metsarahva tee quite fast.
lnagel (2024-09-20 15:41:55+00:00): I'm fine with whatever scheme there is, as long as the routing isn't totally broken and the scheme itself is documented somewhere. I was not aware that there is a community of users that dis-approve defaults from iD / Every Door that i was using to fix the issues.

Early this summer it was routing me on main car roads and then via the running paths covered with wood pulp. Total nonsense. I used the OSRM routing debugger and fixed the parts it got wrong. I worked on the data until I got the routing to be safe, then left it alone.

I will re-check this after you have finished your rollbacks and the routers have had the chance to update their datasets.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2024-09-20 15:48:51+00:00): Well, the data isn't about safety. It's your and router's job. And simple routers with a single cycling profile will never accommodate all situations and users.
lnagel (2024-09-20 15:53:48+00:00): Yes, absolutely true. Nevertheless, if all of this knowledge is hidden in some thread somewhere deep in forums, then for practical purposes it's not visible. The editor's defaults should support this better.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2024-09-20 15:59:40+00:00): I meant the use_sidepath issue here :)
aceman444 (2024-10-23 22:28:15+00:00): Zdroj?
mycokeen (2024-10-24 06:35:20+00:00): Tu je to čisto lokálna znalosť, volá sa to Žleby ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
HikeAndMap (2024-06-22 21:28:16+00:00): It might be better to correct the overlapping instead of deletion - but in this case it'll be okay as in future we're going to use our high-res orthographic imagery for more detailed mapping anyways so we'll accept the deletion at this point.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152756469
sjodl_ (2024-06-16 14:13:10+00:00): Hej, 
widzę, że zmieniłaś/eś kilka odcinków zamkniętej linii kolejowej nr 411, dodając tag service=siding (czyli, po polsku, oznaczając tę linię jako bocznicę). Problem w tym, że linia ta, ani w stanie obecnym, ani przed zamknięciem, nie spełnia definicji bocznicy (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:service=siding?uselang=pl). Czy jest jakiś powód o którym nie wiem, dla któego dodałaś/eś ten tag?