piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
pwbriggs (2026-07-13 03:21:22+00:00): Thanks. A couple notes:

* Phone number format in the US in OpenStreetMap should include the country code and all dashes, so like +1-425-988-1565

* We expand abbreviations in addresses and names and spell them out in full, even if what's written on signs is the abbreviated form. The reason is that it's easy for data consumers to abbreviate common phrases (for example "South 38th Court" -> "S 38th Ct") as needed, but it's much harder to un-abbreviate things in a computerized way (e.g. "ST" could stand for Street, Saint, or even Sound Transit depending on context). The exception is the state code in the address, which uses the standard state postal abbreviations (WA).

Let me know if you need help updating these. Thanks again for your contributions and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
Wildsharky (2026-07-15 04:22:57+00:00): Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185638830
turbopixel (2026-07-13 17:12:47+00:00): Thx! Die Relationen zur kleinen Inselfläche im Gewässer habe ich nicht richtig vermerkt bekommen
pitscheplatsch (2026-07-13 06:27:39+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
Is the added name real?
house (155228346), v6
eerib (2026-07-13 05:22:24+00:00): Hello PatGT (socketpuppet account of user Shinsplints),

This edit has been reverted.

If you would like to discuss this further you can do so by emailing the Data Working Group (data@openstreetmap.org) and referencing Ticket #2026071110000275

Thank you, eerib
silversurfer83 (2026-07-13 19:54:59+00:00): Hi,

zu den Post und Paketshops kannst du dir diesen node mal ansehen
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/410272667
da ist die Post schon dran erfasst und die Post nebendran ist damit doppelt in der Datenbank.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185618972
alpacaMaps (2026-07-14 03:58:37+00:00): Hi — thanks for adding surveillance camera data.

The camera node(s) added in this changeset (node/14007297103) sit at exactly the same position (35.0374767, -92.4227810) as node/14007297104, node/14007297902, node/14007303101, node/14007303301, which the same account mapped in other changesets. 5 camera nodes share that single point.

Cameras at one site are normally mapped where each unit physically is, usually with a `direction` tag, so identical coordinates for several of them is usually either a duplicate or a position that has not been refined yet.

Could you take a look and either move each node to the camera it represents, or remove any duplicates? Happy to help if it would be useful.

Thanks!
alpacaMaps
alpacaMaps (2026-07-14 03:58:37+00:00): Hi — thanks for adding surveillance camera data.

The camera node(s) added in this changeset (node/14007297104) sit at exactly the same position (35.0374767, -92.4227810) as node/14007297103, node/14007297902, node/14007303101, node/14007303301, which the same account mapped in other changesets. 5 camera nodes share that single point.

Cameras at one site are normally mapped where each unit physically is, usually with a `direction` tag, so identical coordinates for several of them is usually either a duplicate or a position that has not been refined yet.

Could you take a look and either move each node to the camera it represents, or remove any duplicates? Happy to help if it would be useful.

Thanks!
alpacaMaps
alpacaMaps (2026-07-14 03:58:38+00:00): Hi — thanks for adding surveillance camera data.

The camera node(s) added in this changeset (node/14007297902) sit at exactly the same position (35.0374767, -92.4227810) as node/14007297103, node/14007297104, node/14007303101, node/14007303301, which the same account mapped in other changesets. 5 camera nodes share that single point.

Cameras at one site are normally mapped where each unit physically is, usually with a `direction` tag, so identical coordinates for several of them is usually either a duplicate or a position that has not been refined yet.

Could you take a look and either move each node to the camera it represents, or remove any duplicates? Happy to help if it would be useful.

Thanks!
alpacaMaps
alpacaMaps (2026-07-14 03:58:39+00:00): Hi — thanks for adding surveillance camera data.

The camera node(s) added in this changeset (node/14007303101) sit at exactly the same position (35.0374767, -92.4227810) as node/14007297103, node/14007297104, node/14007297902, node/14007303301, which the same account mapped in other changesets. 5 camera nodes share that single point.

Cameras at one site are normally mapped where each unit physically is, usually with a `direction` tag, so identical coordinates for several of them is usually either a duplicate or a position that has not been refined yet.

Could you take a look and either move each node to the camera it represents, or remove any duplicates? Happy to help if it would be useful.

Thanks!
alpacaMaps
alpacaMaps (2026-07-14 03:58:39+00:00): Hi — thanks for adding surveillance camera data.

The camera node(s) added in this changeset (node/14007303301) sit at exactly the same position (35.0374767, -92.4227810) as node/14007297103, node/14007297104, node/14007297902, node/14007303101, which the same account mapped in other changesets. 5 camera nodes share that single point.

Cameras at one site are normally mapped where each unit physically is, usually with a `direction` tag, so identical coordinates for several of them is usually either a duplicate or a position that has not been refined yet.

Could you take a look and either move each node to the camera it represents, or remove any duplicates? Happy to help if it would be useful.

Thanks!
alpacaMaps
Wildsharky (2026-07-15 04:20:47+00:00): Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185631914
BCNorwich (2026-07-13 04:54:39+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I've tweaked the buildings, joined overlaps, squared up, removed layer tags.

Regards Bernard.
rajdhani (2026-07-14 12:14:54+00:00): Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185713668
caprieldeluca (2026-07-14 00:40:44+00:00): Hola, gracias por contribuir con el mapa!

Revisé tus cambios. Tuve que revertirlos porque no son correctos.
- En este último cambio se agregó un nodo sin etiquetas dentro del edificio industrial.
- En los cambios anteriores, se eliminaron nodos y edificios que ya estaban mapeados.
- Además se unieron líneas de interpolación de numeraciones, de uso del suelo y de edificios. Son líneas con fines diferentes y preferimos que estén separadas.

Mantuve los nodos preexistentes, ajusté un poco las geometrías y uní el lote con los nodos libres.

Por cualquier consulta podés contactarte con la comunidad OpenStreetMap Argentina: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Argentina#Contacto
cjcraig2608 (2026-07-13 00:25:06+00:00): also changed the height of the courthouse to match in real life
rajdhani (2026-07-16 05:55:27+00:00): Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185824983
MxxCon (2026-07-14 04:22:24+00:00): Hello.
Instead of deleting existing entries and creating new ones, it's much better to update the existing ones into the current state of the world. Doing it this way preserves history of this object, which can be useful to refer to in the future.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185622298
Taya_S (2026-07-13 11:52:46+00:00): Please see: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20944
BCNorwich (2026-07-14 05:42:04+00:00): Hi, Your new highway Way: 1537832588 duplicates an existing highway, so could disrupt routing. I've removed it. If a way needs correcting, please correct the existing ways thus maintaining history and not causing problems.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2026-07-14 05:56:40+00:00): Same problem as above with Way: 1537832586, it's removed.
ForestFurnace (2026-07-13 02:00:32+00:00): Also used: https://www.waynetwplandfill.com/our-services/compressed-natural-gas/
Minh Nguyen (2026-07-19 07:22:57+00:00): Hi, thanks for adding the missing bit of cycleway. Are the YMCA’s parking lots really named “Parking Lot” followed by the secondary intercardinal directions? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1537841823 It’s OK to leave a parking lot unnamed if it doesn’t go by a common name in practice.
Frans S (2026-07-14 09:33:52+00:00): Hello. Thanks for  mapping.
In general, accurately mapped. However, you regularly included a yard in a mapping ,
Check this object. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1537847815/history
 1/3 part is a yard.
There are more objects where you included a yard.
I adjusted them
Best regards
Udarian (2026-07-13 02:59:11+00:00): my bad, meant to put the a changeset comment of "updated ref (and related tags) values of SR 589 in Pasco County as consensus has been formed to use SR in ref's in Florida #Flo_FL->SR_convert"
hsc666 (2026-07-13 10:48:36+00:00): CS reverted due to damage to the relation
Wildsharky (2026-07-16 05:18:06+00:00): Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185822426
alpacaMaps (2026-07-18 18:09:49+00:00): This changeset adds one or more surveillance cameras in a spot that looks unlikely — the nodes sit well away from any road, which usually means the cameras aren't physically present on the ground.

If these cameras are real, please let us know so the map stays accurate. Otherwise, we'd kindly ask that you avoid adding cameras that aren't actually there, and that you remove any temporary or test nodes once you're done.

If this was simply a mistake, no problem at all — just clean up the nodes that don't correspond to a real-world camera, and leave a quick note here so we can help.

Thanks for helping keep OpenStreetMap accurate.

— alpacaMaps
Jarek 🚲 (2026-07-15 01:46:51+00:00): (minor, but you probably want to use the non-imports account for this kind of edit)
skfd (2026-07-15 01:49:05+00:00): was logged in as her on phone briefly my bad!
skfd (2026-07-15 01:50:02+00:00): actually not briefly my very bad
stormekorn (2026-07-13 03:39:48+00:00): Liebe/r Reviewer/in,
Ich habe bemerkt dass der Radweg am Südwestlichen Übergang von Theresienhöhe über die Bavariaringkreuzung hinweg nicht genau der Strecke folgte. Allerdings merke ich jetzt dass die Hauptstraße Theresienhöhe schon alle nötige Information bzgl. des Radwegs zur rechten Seite hatte (nur nicht als spearaten Pfad).

Ich bin noch unerfahren was das mappen angeht. Bitte die Änderung gerne ablehnen falls das separate tracen des Fahrradwegs nicht die richtige Herangehensweise ist.
Rainero (2026-07-13 07:53:26+00:00): Hallo stormekorn,
willkommen bei Openstreetmap! Super, dass du mithilst die Kartendaten zu verbessern.  In diesem Fall hast du ja schon selbst herausgefunden, dass die Radfahrstreifen an der Straße schon erfasst war. Toll, dass du das als Neuling gleich so analysiert hast.  
In der Tat war es vorher richtig, weil der Radfahrstreifen Teil der Fahrbahn ist.
Fahrradwege sind vielfältig und entsprechend vielfältig ist die Erfassung in OSM. Dafür gibt es eine gute Übersicht im Wiki:  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen_kartieren  
Hier war die Kartierung als Teil der Straße korrekt, daher werde ich deine Änderung zurücksetzen.
Ich hoffe du lässt dich nicht gleich entmutigen und wünsche weiter Spaß beim Beitragen zu OSM. Bei Fragen einfach melden.

Viele Grüße,
Rainer
alpacaMaps (2026-07-28 01:26:27+00:00): This changeset adds one or more surveillance cameras in a spot that looks unlikely — the nodes sit well away from any road, which usually means the cameras aren't physically present on the ground.

— alpacaMaps
alpacaMaps (2026-07-28 01:26:13+00:00): This changeset adds one or more surveillance cameras in a spot that looks unlikely — the nodes sit well away from any road, which usually means the cameras aren't physically present on the ground.

— alpacaMaps
Wildsharky (2026-07-16 05:14:29+00:00): Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185762062
pitscheplatsch (2026-07-13 06:27:07+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
Is the added name real?
TETS (246516151), v4
rajdhani (2026-07-14 06:36:51+00:00): Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185696996
Wildsharky (2026-07-15 04:44:11+00:00): Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185708781
MappingMore (2026-07-16 06:09:51+00:00): Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185825466
Himké (2026-07-21 14:08:38+00:00): Bustycat坏蛋有困難解釋代誌嗎？
rajdhani (2026-07-14 11:33:39+00:00): Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185711412
Kovoschiz (2026-07-13 17:19:03+00:00): Please don't make many changes if you don't understand, or aren't familiar. `=stadium` is large scale, tiered covered seatings, mostly outdoors.
Kovoschiz (2026-07-13 17:22:44+00:00): `=stadium` is incidentally clear here to be wrong from removal of `building=`
Comino (2026-07-13 08:49:55+00:00): Hi,

In your "Potraviny Mandák" edit you use the tag "payment:cryptocurrencies=yes".

The tag "payment:cryptocurrencies=*" was a payment tag proposal which was rejected by the OSM community. Use this tag only when cryptocurrencies are NOT accepted.
Source: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Cryptocurrencies_with_payment_tag and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:payment:*#Cryptocurrencies

Please REMOVE the payment:cryptocurrencies=yes !

Please also add address details.

Thank you.

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
BTC Map
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-13 16:32:52+00:00): SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is not allowed on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account; see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more information. Furthermore, use of Google Maps as a source is strictly prohibited by both OSM and Google policies--see https://osm.wiki/Google 

Reverted adding SEO spam POI with advertising/malformed tags and source=* of Google Maps, in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/185664706
aTarom (2026-07-13 06:42:33+00:00): Se siguen eliminando survey_point, son incorrectos realmente?
Entiendo que no recibes estos mensajes:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185186834
rajdhani (2026-07-14 08:34:55+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185702223
Supaplex (2026-07-13 12:38:25+00:00): There is already a restaurant: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6376159887
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185631369
Kovoschiz (2026-07-13 17:25:28+00:00): `shop=` is a feature for what business it is. It's not for listing everything sold. Don't add semicolon to it.
Kovoschiz (2026-07-13 17:27:13+00:00): 2. It's reasonably expected these `shop=` usually sells these things. This is counterproductive.
GOwin (2026-07-13 09:50:31+00:00): Hi there. I think you would want to review this edit. 

If you follow along the waters of Maytunas creek upstream, you should be able to determine that it flows Westward, going into the Pasig River because their elevation is higher.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185631612
eggie (2026-07-13 07:53:01+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Samuele Battarra (2026-07-15 21:32:39+00:00): You placed the noexit on an intersection node. This is incorrect because it's unclear which road it refers to. Leave the closed road disconnected from the other and place the noexit on the final node, or place a node before the intersection and tag it to identify it as a barrier.
nopra (2026-07-16 10:52:20+00:00): Appreciate your correction. I changed no-exit to a node with barrier tag.
Dimitar155 (2026-07-13 09:21:17+00:00): Сигурен ли си че node/10984521699 е вакантен? Когато минавах оттам последно не изглеждаше като да се отдава под наем.
Kaloan-koko (2026-07-24 11:07:48+00:00): По-рано седяха някакви означения извън него, а и се виждаха дрехите вътре през прозореца. Сега липсват и първото и второто. Вариант е и в момента да са в необозначена лятна ваканция, но ме съмнява. Иначе поне до миналото лято/есен съм сигурен, че работеше.
FajrAl (2026-07-13 11:32:45+00:00): Hai, mohon yang diubah itu satu saja, kenapa satu gedung diubah jadi Pertamina Training and Consulting? apakah sudah disurvei bahwa bisnis yang lain sudah tidak ada?
ptcpertamina_developer (2026-07-14 01:03:58+00:00): halo, saya adalah pekerja dari Pertamina Training and Consulting,
bisa di cek di google maps, kalo sekarang gedung tersebut sudah berubah,
dan lokasi seperti bukopin, solaria , dan kfc sudah tidak ada lagi,
FajrAl (2026-07-14 01:34:14+00:00): Kalau begitu yang sudah tidak ada bisa dihapus saja. Kalau dilihat sekarang yang ada datanya rangkap.
trigpoint (2026-07-13 15:39:18+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/185661068
Wildsharky (2026-07-15 04:40:27+00:00): Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185697019
empty_child (2026-07-13 13:09:16+00:00): Здравствуйте
Все-таки addr:place:*, не addr:plase:*
kosmgeolan (2026-07-15 00:50:12+00:00): Спасибо))
cjgeist (2026-07-13 07:10:13+00:00): aligned geometry only around block of Atlantic-Campbell-Chase-Lyon
trigpoint (2026-07-13 15:39:14+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/185661068
trigpoint (2026-07-13 15:39:11+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/185661068
habi (2026-07-13 07:12:36+00:00): Sorry, copy-paste-Fehler: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5387384 erledigt.
trigpoint (2026-07-13 15:39:07+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/185661068
NeatNit (2026-07-19 17:00:21+00:00): אז כמו שאמרתי כאן https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184264370 צריך למחוק את התחנה, לא להזיז אותה. אעשה את זה עכשיו
NeatNit (2026-07-19 17:04:37+00:00): https://osm.org/changeset/186017948
Ram Ezrah (2026-07-20 04:36:33+00:00): I've updated the wikidata to the new location
MappingMore (2026-07-14 11:52:54+00:00): Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185712423
nevw (2026-07-14 01:38:53+00:00): Hi, I noticed that you have created the same edit error on four buildings here
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.29431&lat=-37.79662&zoom=15
It seems to me that you might be editing with too much haste.
nevw (2026-07-14 08:52:35+00:00): It may help to ‘square’ the building before moving on to the next.
adigis (2026-07-14 15:34:48+00:00): I apologize for the mistake. Please let me know if there are any further errors.
Tomas Straupis (2026-07-13 11:18:49+00:00): Pakeitimas neteisingas, atšaukiu.
evgenykatyshev (2026-07-13 08:11:55+00:00): А чем компания занимается? Сейчас получилось, что вы добавили просто здание с названием без указания типа бизнеса.

И есть ли у компании грузинское название?
Fraxi (2026-07-13 08:11:59+00:00): Знаеш ли дали има някакъв скрипт/инструмент да открием всички такива залепени площи по-бързо? То, известно време може да отнеме и само с това да се занимавам...
foreigner037 (2026-07-13 08:19:04+00:00): Не съм чувал за подобен инструмент. Не знам даже дали технически е възможно да се намерят такива площи. Дори да почнем с големите градове мисля, че ще е добър напредък.
Fraxi (2026-07-13 09:30:39+00:00): Разглеждах примери за overpass заявки(не всички), разглеждах възможни опции при osmose и OSMI. Единственото, което намерих и може би било подходящо към момента е:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Overpass_API/Overpass_API_by_Example#Search_for_nodes_which_belong_to_two_different_ways

Ако се преработи за примерна зона болницата в Шумен, се получава това:
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2taX
Dimitar155 (2026-07-13 15:59:50+00:00): Osmose има подобен валидатор, но той засича само "пресичания" - https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/issues/open?item=1070&country=bulgaria

Отворих https://github.com/osmose-qa/osmose-backend/issues/2773 за "докосващи" се площи и пътища.
Fraxi (2026-07-13 16:05:22+00:00): Мите, мерси, остави, тази overpass заявка работи, просто трябва да се  конфигурира и преработва. Даже направих промени, май и foreigner.
Fraxi (2026-07-15 10:57:59+00:00): Sorry, че коментирам тук пак(иначе явно във форума трябва да се пуска тема). То да разлепваме по цялата карта в България сигурно ще отнеме месеци... Виж само за някои участъци в Горна баня какво се случва
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185776013
И там трябва да се внимава да не се местят граници, да гледаш за целите жилищни полигони, все едно на теб това ти е работа. И само защото някои са решили да използват "самозалепващите" се възможности на iD редактора... Доста демотивиращо
Fraxi (2026-07-15 11:00:26+00:00): Да, вярно, че преди много снимки са били с лошо качество. Ама е можело да приложат малко повече старание...
foreigner037 (2026-07-15 11:01:27+00:00): За мен най-досадното е, че няма автоматично разлепване на отделни участъци. Щеше ми се да можеш да маркираш например 3 точки (начало - среда за маркиране на посока - край) и да можеш да разлепиш всички точки по оста им.
Dimitar155 (2026-07-15 12:33:10+00:00): В уеб редактора, може просто да сложиш area=no, да срежеш пътя някъде и оттам да продължиш да чертаеш по новата следа. Тогава обаче има три риска:
1) Да затриеш оригиналната версия на пътя. При рязане винаги по-дългия участък запазва историята. Ако се случи да не е този който искаш да бъде, режеш го на половинки докато стане по-къс от другия, обединяваш и пак режеш.
2) Може да забравиш да махнеш area=no от площта
3) Може да забравиш да изтриеш линии, които вече не са нужни.

Use at your own risk :).
Fraxi (2026-07-15 12:52:19+00:00): Има и още рискове - примерно на JOSM, ако откачиш единия край на гората(залепен за път, линиите да отидат в другия край). Така че това  специално, което си дал в твоя пример @foreigner037, може да не е недостатък, а превантивно предимство даже. Виновен е авторът на залепващата функция. Също и ако самите пътища не са както трябва и тръгнеш да разкачваш, автоматично се изтриват сегменти(на JOSM е така). И други.
@Dimitar155, това последното, освен, че има и такива disclaimers по някои ToS, звучи и малко като текст от листовка на лекарства...
foreigner037 (2026-07-15 12:56:36+00:00): Това решение не ми се струва много адекватно, основно заради рисковете. В JOSM например има опция за създаване на арки, която работи по много подобен на описаният от мен начин, така че определено би било технически възможно да се направи.
Dimitar155 (2026-07-15 13:08:39+00:00): Чакаме да ни огрее слънцето :)

https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/2570
Fraxi (2026-07-16 19:50:22+00:00): Така... значи, на JOSM има(може би вградена) функция "Unglue".
https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Help/Action/UnGlue
Отделно има добавки като "utilsplugin2" и "JOSM.Missing.Tools", с които могат да се разлепват релации. Пробвах да разлепя полигона на кв. Суходол от някои улици и изместих източните му сегменти малко на запад. Селектира се(като предварително се свали) целия полигон. Не точките, а линията. И се натиска клавиш "G". И после посредством новосъздадените точки, се мести полигона. https://osmcha.org/changesets/185865338 Митко може да погледне да не съм прецакал релация. За което си имаше дежурно предупреждение от JOSM.
kurisubrooks (2026-07-13 08:33:51+00:00): Hello, as the local community + DWG are still in discussion regarding your changes to this airport, would you mind putting any further edits in this area on hold until we reach a resolution?
Kind regards, Chris.
olehz (2026-07-13 08:39:05+00:00): Ok
Joel Koen (2026-07-13 08:46:32+00:00): Hello olehz, just commenting here to avoid clogging up some of the other changesets. In https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141555869#c1212205 you mention working for a company that makes use of the data you're adding here, was just wondering if you could clarify if you're getting paid to work on OpenStreetMap, and are there any other OpenStreetMap users also working for this company?