piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Glassman (2023-02-28 23:35:11+00:00): driveways should be tagged as highway=service + service=driveway. Can you fix this?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133112989
Glassman (2023-02-28 23:36:58+00:00): Please review your previous edits to correct the tagging of driveways and square the buildings so they look more professional. Let me know if you need assistance.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133113109
rene78 (2023-02-28 06:18:46+00:00): That is the name of the hotel?
hdevine825 (2023-03-01 04:00:21+00:00): I wonder if the bicycle=yes tag is useful for routing on some of these like: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/395178831
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133113572
map per (2023-02-28 07:56:14+00:00): Hello Heinrich Wegener,

Are there really two toilets ((1) and (2)) in Karitane or is that a duplicate?

Thanks and best regards
map per

(1) https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2881831208/history
(2) https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10698729205/history
silversurfer83 (2023-02-28 19:55:50+00:00): Hi Heinrich,

when using maps.me, please be careful about not adding duplicate data. Also be shure not to confuse your personal notes on the map with adding data to the actual OSM-database which is used by millions worlwide.

cheers
silversurfer83
mavl (2023-04-25 09:11:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
map per (2023-03-14 19:01:52+00:00): REVERTED (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133351373)
CurlingMan13 (2023-03-26 09:12:57+00:00): Descriptive names should not be used to describe a feature.  It should just be building=house.

Additionally, you need to square the buildings using "q".
flohoff (2023-03-02 15:27:47+00:00): Moin,
ist das access=yes hier absicht? Das problem mit access=yes ist das es ALLE access restrictions die default sind ausser kraft setzt.

Also ein access=yes auf einem fußweg lässt LKWs zu ...

Ist hier nicht der fall - ich finde nur access=yes immer sehr auffällig.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1150089914

Flo
bielebog (2023-03-02 20:03:21+00:00): Nö, die redundanten Tags waren beim Split des Wegs nur draufgeblieben. Der östliche Teil Richtung Baustelle P10 ist hinter einem Bauzaun, deswegen nun access=private. Den Rest redundanter Tags war ich so frei zu entfernen.
lenny32 (2023-02-28 08:39:47+00:00): Bonjour
Vous trouverez dans ce lien, pourquoi "sentier" n'est pas un nom et ne doit pas être mis dans "name"
https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/bang-operation-coup-de-poing-sur-les-bornes-de-recharge/9943/30
fischerhuder (2023-02-28 07:36:30+00:00): Source: GPS, local knowledge
leheng (2023-02-28 08:08:41+00:00): mybad😅😬, will revert this
user_17551983 (2023-03-15 03:31:07+00:00): hast du den weg vorort überprüft? hat sich der zustand geändert? 
der weg war auf disused: weil zugewachsen
Vaucluse (2023-03-18 09:14:34+00:00): Hallo, danke für diesen Hinweis. ICh finde den Pfad durchaus noch begehbar  und nutze ihn ab und zu für eine Tour vom Parkplatz an der B48 zur Klettererhütte -> Rehberg und wieder zurück ins Kayserbachtal. Dann geht es ein stück an der B48 lang (kein Weg) und links auf den diskutierten Pfad zurück zum Parkplatz. Im Grunde könnte man auch nochh einen Pfad ergänzen, der am Rand der sücdlichsten Waldwiese zum Weg führt.
Bis auf die untersten Meter ist der Weg auch nicht zugewachsen und wird durchaus auch vom Forst benutzt.
user_17551983 (2023-03-18 17:16:34+00:00): hallo, dann sind deine erfahrungen dort jünger. '20 war die wegschleife hoch von der b48 zugewachsen ohne trampelpfad. oben sprossen keimlinge im forstweg. habs angepasst. kannst den weg runter zum bachtal ruhig als trampelpfad eintragen. gruss!
ivanbranco (2023-03-14 18:38:12+00:00): Ciao, così hai eliminato anche l'edificio però, è stato demolito?
gi_maf (2023-03-14 18:46:55+00:00): Ciao! Al momento c'è ancora, ma non è agibile. C'è in programma di farlo diventare appartamenti, ma pare che cambierà.
ivanbranco (2023-03-14 18:50:52+00:00): Se c'è ancora non andava eliminato. Potevi aggiungere un disused=yes volendo.

Buon mapping
gi_maf (2023-03-14 18:53:02+00:00): Verissimo, provvedo a riaggiungerlo, grazie
mavl (2023-04-25 09:01:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
pyrog (2024-03-02 12:44:03+00:00): Bonjour Xavier,

L'itinéraire du réseau de carrefours que tu as ajouté contient des erreurs.
https://knooppuntnet.nl/en/analysis/route/15541945

Peux-tu vérifier stp ?

Cordialement,
Yves
mavl (2023-04-25 09:06:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
Max-Kritic (2023-04-03 17:17:04+00:00): Rien n'indique que les chemins du cap et la RD soient encore inaccessibles. Pour moi, il n'y a que la route où le calvaire a disparu qui est inaccessible.
mavl (2023-04-25 09:06:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
Friendly_Ghost (2023-03-01 22:30:45+00:00): Hello. I have a few questions/remarks about the addresses here:

addr:country tags should only contain the 2-letter code. 

Building numbers (عمارة رقم ) should not be part of the addr:housenumber tag.

What does addr:daïra mean?

Why are there several places with addr:housenumber=0 ?

addr:city seems to be tagged in an inconsistent way: I found TAGHZOUT, Taghzout ⵜⴰⵖⵣⵓⵜ تغزوت and تغزوت. Which one is correct?
mavl (2023-04-25 09:09:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 08:59:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:04:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
habi (2023-06-27 07:52:51+00:00): Ciao joe707

Du hast hier ein paar tolle Namen zu Wegen hinzugefügt, z.B. "Wo de Grabe nach oben läuft" für https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/391733367/ und "Seiten Obholzweg" für https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/219134579

Sind die Wege wirklich so angeschrieben?

Gruss aus Bern,
habi

PS: Ich bin hier wegen https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3752714
joe707 (2023-06-28 07:49:04+00:00): Die Namen habe ich aus den Info-Boards in der Nähe.
habi (2023-06-28 08:02:15+00:00): Sehr cool, Mersi!
tyr_asd (2023-03-06 08:46:25+00:00): Hey. I'm wondering why you downgraded the network tag from "rwn" to "lwn" of the 500 trail. In my view, this route is more important than your regular local hike, and does fit the definition for "rwn" quite well.
dieterdreist-CAI (2023-03-06 15:33:05+00:00): I agree that this trail, with a length of 52,5km, could formally be seen as part of a regional network, if using the definition of the German wiki page. I did not find relevant definitions on the English tag definition page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:network=rwn?uselang=en 
I think if you look at it from a network perspective, this is just one of a handful of all 1070 hiking relations operated by the SAT that go beyond 20km, but are not divided in daytours and are never exceeding 65km, and are all following the same systematics for numbering, so I dediced to see them all as part of the local network. I agree it could be discussed, this regards also the O300 (64km and was already lwn), O133 (44km and you have seen it yourself as lwn 6 months ago) and E349. So basically only the O500 was tagged with network rwn of all 1070 trails operated by SAT and even as it wasn't the longest.
Cheers
Martin
tyr_asd (2023-03-07 15:08:53+00:00): Yeah, it's definitely not super clear cut. I would have gone with the definition https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:CAI#Percorsi_escursionistici, which uses the following description for `rwn`: _itinerari di lunga percorrenza che attraversano più province e/o mettono in collegamento più percorsi ordinari._ I think the 500 trail fits all these requirements.

Yes, there is not really a network of such "medium distance" trails in Italy, but I don't think it should be an argument against using the tag value, as these routes still connect to local and national routes in many places. IMHO `rwn` could provide a good distinction between short "single day" and longer "multi day" routes (that aren't quite of the caliber of the super-long distance routes of say, the SI or E5 for example).

I hiked the 133 (Sentiero Aldo Bonacossa) last summer. I wasn't so sure how to tag that one: It definitely is a multi-day route, but the paths are in parts really narrow (in some sections even pathless) and the route is in large parts only rarely traveled. But given that the route is quite prominently signposted at the start/endpoints, I'd now tend towards also tagging it as a `rwn`. Similarly, the same applies also to the few longer routes of the AVS like the nearby https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5487056. PS: Another nearby hiking route of similar distance which already has rwn is https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11009657
dieterdreist-CAI (2023-03-07 17:15:25+00:00): Ok, I was about to change the 3 longer routes of the SAT to rwn, but when I was looking at the aspect of integration into a regional, national or international network, the 300 had nothing of it, maybe could be seen as "regional distributor" with many local routes attaching to it (if it is not still local), 
https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=7027992&map=11.0/46.1202/10.7979
The 500 is sharing the way with the Sentiero Italia and connecting to the Via Claudia Augusta, but apart these connections it isn't really part of a regional network either, with a loose end and offering few alternatives (it's only "doubling" the SI)
https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=1524702&type=relation&map=8.0/46.2797/11.4308
Also the 133 is crossing the SI but not connecting to anything else and is limited locally in its extent: 
https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=7396852&map=10.0/46.4874/11.0591
I would see your example Ultner Höhenweg as local, its start and end are just a few kilometers apart, and it isn't long enough to be considered a regional ring, it remains in the same area.
Anyway, I think it can be justified to make them rwn because they are connecting multiple local paths and are longer than the others. I did not upgrade the E349 which is significantly shorter (23km).
See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133411469
alessandrocarmeli (2023-02-28 15:01:48+00:00): Se può esserti d'aiuto tutti i semafori di trieste hanno il pulsante
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133119691
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-28 09:37:05+00:00): Correction:  Cleaning up after golf mappers
gendy54 (2023-03-01 16:42:37+00:00): Discussion en cours avec le contributeur: https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/recensement-de-renouee-du-japon-plante-invasive/13145
FasterTracker (2023-06-20 16:13:18+00:00): Saudações!
O que motivou a alteração de etiquetagem do Terminal Rodoviário de Bucelas (entre outros)?

De seguida está o objeto em questão:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/187153768

Cumprimentos,
FT
silversurfer83 (2023-02-28 19:59:00+00:00): Hi
ich bekomme ein Fehler 404, wenn ich die von Dir verlinkte Seite aufrufen möchte. Sicher, dass der Link korrekt ist?

Cheers
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133120897
AB_13 (2023-03-01 18:43:15+00:00): Hallo,
der Link funktioniert bei mir. Bitte versuchs doch noch einmal: http://www.bestwiger-panoramaweg.de/tourenplanung/uebersicht/
CurlingMan13 (2023-03-01 00:24:56+00:00): Same thing here...  Multipolygon Relation should be used instead.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon
bxl-forever (2023-02-28 10:49:26+00:00): Kinderdagverblijf is already on the map
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1091202329

Please undo your edit, yo are creating a useless duplicate.
dadavid (2023-03-30 11:51:34+00:00): Hallo, 
danke für deinen Edit, aber bist du sicher, dass der Hundesalon hier noch existiert? Ich habe ihn vor Ort nicht gefunden ...
VG
CoyKoi (2023-03-01 06:44:39+00:00): Thanks for adding the name. You have adjusted the geometry to old imagery (see Bing for the recent aerial - it is a construction area)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133122030
NastassiaKalesnikava (2023-03-01 14:14:28+00:00): Hi! I have changed the geometry according to Bing. Thank you for your comment!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133122030
نورس الطائر (2023-03-04 09:09:33+00:00): Hello mapper.      
What did you edit here?      
Can you please add a good changeset comment instead of just "location", "path" or "building", read: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
osmviborg (2023-02-28 12:05:48+00:00): Vejen er udenfor hegnet, er du sikker? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/102034247
GregersP (2023-02-28 12:11:40+00:00): Jeg var 100%, men tjekker igen!
GregersP (2023-02-28 12:15:25+00:00): Du har ret - jeg er begyndt at bruge JOSM og har fået selected for meget. Fixet i https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133126107
osmviborg (2023-02-28 12:37:24+00:00): 👍
habi (2023-03-02 08:36:08+00:00): Hallo Kerstin

Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap, schön machst du hier mit und hilfst die Kartendaten zu pflegen.
Ich habe deine Änderung ergänzt, indem ich die Internetadresse *mit* https erfasst habe, dann wird diese in vielen Programmen die OpenStreetMap verwenden auch korrekt angezeigt.

E Gruess us Bärn,
habi
eggie (2023-02-28 11:19:03+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback.. Probeer de info samen te voegen met de bestaande adresnode. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-02-28 20:05:32+00:00): Info samengevoegd met adresnode
eggie (2023-02-28 11:26:01+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback  Tip..  We voegen geen bedrijfsinfo en nogmaals een adres toe aan de gebouwomtrek. Daarvoor gebruiken we de reeds aanwezige adresnode.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-02-28 11:31:20+00:00): In ifo verplaatst naar adresnode
CurlingMan13 (2023-03-01 00:15:48+00:00): There is a vineyard tag.  Do not use the name to add descriptive information.  Just use the right tags...
jmarchon (2023-02-28 16:11:14+00:00): Thank you, not sure how this happened!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133123567
Strubbl (2023-02-28 14:01:23+00:00): Hallo DJH MV, 
du hast hier die Stadt auf Prora von Binz geändert. Es war bereits korrekt kartiert, weil zwar addr:city=Binz war, aber addr:suburb hatte den Wert Prora. Bitte schau in die Doku zu dem Thema: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:addr:suburb?uselang=de

Viele Grüße
Sven
DJH MV (2023-02-28 14:18:27+00:00): Es wird mir aber in dem Programm, welches openstreetmap nutzt nicht korrekt ausgegeben. Es muss dort irgend ein Zusatz hin mit Prora (Binz OT Prora o.ä.). Die Firma, die die Software betreibt meinte zu mir ich soll das direkt ändern bei openstreetmap
Strubbl (2023-02-28 21:08:30+00:00): Das liegt dann an "dem Programm, welches openstreetmap nutzt" und nicht an OpenStreetMap. Sag doch bitte der Firma, sie sollen ihr Programm korrigieren. Um welche Firma und welches Programm geht es?

Die Änderung, die du hier durchgeführt hast, fällt in die Kategorie "Taggen für den Renderer" bzw. in diesem konkreten Fall "Taggen für ein Programm". Das ist nicht gerne gesehen. Siehe auch 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Taggen_f%C3%BCr_den_Renderer
Vinber-Pro (2023-03-03 11:22:36+00:00): Salut,
tu sais, même si iD propose de remplir et de renseigner la ville et le code postal, il est pas vraiment nécessaire,voire certaines contributeurs n'aiment pas du tout.

à plus
Gaël Bardon (2023-03-03 11:23:41+00:00): Salut,
OK, c'est noté.
A+
Strubbl (2023-02-28 14:02:11+00:00): Hallo, hier ist nun das gleiche Problem wie bei der Jugendherberge. Bitte wieder korrigieren!
tomhukins (2024-05-07 13:51:41+00:00): Thank you for all your useful work on OpenStreetMap.

It would be helpful to state whether these toilets are inside Tesco or Marks & Spencer, perhaps using the operator= tag.  Currently it's unclear.
Strubbl (2023-02-28 14:05:30+00:00): Hallo, heißt die Straße hier wirklich "An der Clön 2"? Ist es nicht nur die Straße "An der Clön"?
Desweiteren hast du in dieser Änderung das Gebäude der Jugendherberge entfernt und in eine Fläche umgewandelt. Warum?
Du hast außerdem den Tourism-Key entfernt. Ich denke, das hier ist eine Jugendherberge oder nicht? Bitte lies die Doku im Wiki unter https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:tourism%3Dhostel
mweper (2023-02-28 13:04:43+00:00): Hola Andrés. ¿Por qué has quitado la etiqueta oneway de la calle de entrada al barrio? Ese etiquetado corresponde con la realidad. Revierto edición.
mweper (2023-02-28 13:04:34+00:00): Hola Andrés. ¿Por qué has quitado la etiqueta oneway de la calle de entrada al barrio? Ese etiquetado corresponde con la realidad. Revierto edición.
mweper (2023-02-28 13:04:24+00:00): Hola Andrés. ¿Por qué has quitado la etiqueta oneway de la calle de entrada al barrio? Ese etiquetado corresponde con la realidad. Revierto edición.
AndresDuhour (2023-02-28 13:21:42+00:00): Hola Franco! te comento acá y por ahí se puede seguir el tema en un mail o en el grupo. El tema que intento resolver es que al tener la barrera y la calle de acceso siguiente el acceso privado, ese tramo queda sin salida. En la práctica alguien que transita la avenida e ingresa a esa calle, ya que está conectada y abierta públicamente, también puede salir de la misma. O alguien que es rechazado en la entrada, también tendría que salir por esa vía. Me pareció la mejor solución eliminar la etiqueta para contemplar este tema. Al hacer estos cambios pensé que tendría que haber consultado antes. Te pido disculpas por la molestia. Espero tus comentarios para ver si se te ocurre otra solución para este tema.
Saludos! Andrés
mweper (2023-02-28 13:04:11+00:00): Hola Andrés. ¿Por qué has quitado la etiqueta oneway de la calle de entrada al barrio? Ese etiquetado corresponde con la realidad. Revierto edición.
eggie (2023-02-28 11:37:50+00:00): Beste Olivier... Tip.. Wanneer woningen zijn opgeleverd dan ook graag de specificatie construction=house verwijderen.

Winkels en zo'n kinderdagverblijf graag bijtaggen op de adresnode. Niet op de gebouwomtrekken. Kijk je nog even?
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=133124213



MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-02-28 11:38:36+00:00): Wanneer je building=....  verwijderd zal de rendering ook verdwijnen van de kaart.
eggie (2023-02-28 11:42:03+00:00): AH was al getagd op de adresnode.. Nu staat het dubbel in de data.
eggie (2023-02-28 11:56:40+00:00): Ik heb wat aangepast.
eggie (2023-02-28 12:01:09+00:00): Station Gouda staat al op de kaart.. Waarom 2x? Dat geeft verwarring. 
Kijk goed svp wat al getagd is. 
Ik zal het weer verwijderen.
No een Tip.. Ga niet een half uur allerlei zaken in heel Gouda aanpassen, want dan zijn je edits lastig te controleren. Dus eerder opslaan en dan naar een volgend project.
Veel plezier met mappen.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-02-28 11:54:45+00:00): Dag Inge... Niet dubbel mappen svp. Gebruik alleen de adresnode.
Ik heb wat aangepast. 
MVG
fabiotofy (2023-03-02 07:41:42+00:00): Ciao, ti sconsiglio di utilizzare le bing maps per allineare edifici in quanto sono sempre discostate, rispetto alla realtà, di almeno 5 - 15 metri. Guarda: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1mKsRJwwKpbkTeGFbDXap6BH_0JzbrUiZ/view?usp=share_link . Se vuoi fare lavori di precisione utilizza solo le TRUE ORTOFOTO ufficiali della Regione F.V.G. disponibili per JOSM a questo indirizzo: wms:http://irdat-ortofoto.regione.fvg.it/geoserver/ows?FORMAT=image/png&TRANSPARENT=TRUE&VERSION=1.1.1&SERVICE=WMS&REQUEST=GetMap&LAYERS=ortofoto:trueorto_FVG_1720&STYLES=&CRS={proj}&WIDTH={width}&HEIGHT={height}&BBOX={bbox}
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133124970
Sandro De Sabbata (2023-03-02 15:37:47+00:00): Grazie proprio non sapevo come fare.
eggie (2023-02-28 12:08:02+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback  Wanneer het een G12a fietspad betreft zijn je toevoegingen correct.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
svenvdmeer (2023-02-28 14:04:58+00:00): Ja dat is het, het deel daarvoor (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/7544816) heeft ook al de juiste tags.
eggie (2023-02-28 15:48:58+00:00): Nog even traffic_sign=NL:G12a toegevoegd.
Mapse
eggie
svenvdmeer (2023-03-01 11:34:34+00:00): Ik zal het de volgende keer meenemen
eggie (2023-03-01 11:59:53+00:00): Oke... Dit is wellicht wel handig om achter de hand te houden..

Presets: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=31077 

G11: mofa=yes, moped=no, traffic_sign=NL:G11 
G12a: moped=designated, mofa=designated, traffic_sign=NL:G12a 
G13: moped=no, mofa=no, traffic_sign=NL:G13 

 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Cycleway 

Veel plezier met mappen,
eggie
mweper (2023-02-28 13:20:20+00:00): Hola Andrés. ¿Por qué has quitado la etiqueta oneway de la calle de entrada a la iglesia? Ese etiquetado corresponde con la realidad. Revierto edición.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-28 12:00:25+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o miejscowości. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, zastosuj kombinację addr:city + addr:street. Jeśli nie, przekaż nazwę miejscowości w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1150143806

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Łukasz Świtaj (2023-02-28 12:11:55+00:00): Dzięki, poprawione: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133126023
rhtb0 (2023-02-28 13:45:55+00:00): 다시 한번 말합니다.
교차로 태그는 일반 도로에만 쓰이는 태그입니다.
등산로같이 사람이 다니는 길에 사용하지 않습니다.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:junction?uselang=ko
이 문서를 읽어보시기 바랍니다.