piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Mattu73 (2024-07-24 07:55:14+00:00): Usunąłem swoje edycje - ale nie uważam pana podejścia za słuszne. Do pilnowania porządku w KPN są też odnośne służby delegowane, zabieranie ludziom możliwości nawigacji jest niebezpieczne, a tacy, którzy chodzą z psami i zbierają grzyby i tak będą bezkarni, bo nie używają nawigacji.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-07-24 00:10:29+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1018458847
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1150041222

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Warin61 (2024-07-24 03:22:48+00:00): The name tag is for the name only .. not descriptions. 
e.g. name=barn already correctly tagged building-barn. 

Read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
Warin61 (2024-07-24 03:15:25+00:00): Why??? 

This makes no difference, none. Why do it? 

The way should not be named!
Warin61 (2024-07-24 03:18:31+00:00): What are you trying to do??? 

These ways should not be named!
CoyKoi (2024-07-24 21:51:18+00:00): Hi chatnz, this inconsistency is due to OSM contributors mapping in different styles. Both approaches are valid. Welcome to OSM, you'll be seeing a lot of similar inconsistencies :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154327976
NorthCrab_upload (2024-07-24 00:50:32+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12063108713
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12063108721

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
rskedgell (2024-07-24 08:09:07+00:00): Thanks. I meant to come back and check on progress there, but didn't quite get round to it. I've closed the associated notes.
aljedaxi (2024-07-24 03:55:46+00:00): Thanks king. The street complete map has quite a few layers can it can be difficult to parse. Had no idea this was the Eaton center at any level. Neat! Thanks!
Scout Jens (2024-08-12 12:31:24+00:00): Hier sind nun ganz viele kleine Kraftwerke eingetragen. Ich denke das passt nicht ganz. Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:generator:method%3Dphotovoltaic
eggie (2024-07-24 05:40:48+00:00): Welcome to OSM. Please don't draw buildings on top of buildings. In that case use building:part=......
Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2024-07-24 05:44:12+00:00): Hi Felipe.. What do you mean with this building. All buildings are import from the Dutch Registry. 
Ask for import at the Dutch forum https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/bag-importverzoeken/3394/2354

Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2024-07-24 05:48:34+00:00): https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/?searchQuery=Rodezand+26&objectId=0599200100011529&theme=BRT+Achtergrond&geometry.x=92733.74804435676&geometry.y=437493.5449107747&zoomlevel=13.44660006149905

I will remove your contribution at this very spot.
Greetz,
eggie
Baloo Uriza (2024-07-24 15:19:02+00:00): Some changeset descriptions so other volunteers can get an idea of what's going on would be very greatly appreciated.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154328831
RespToo (2024-07-24 23:29:22+00:00): No, sorry.
marczoutendijk (2024-07-25 13:24:53+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16500

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
CorruptComputer (2024-12-28 12:08:25+00:00): Hi, the POI you added for Big Tyme Billiards is a duplicate of node/11037664808, so I have removed it.
Allison P (2024-07-24 07:19:07+00:00): The road ends just before Pioneer Canal. The rest is a shared driveway.
Lkumar_lyft (2024-07-24 08:35:31+00:00):  Thanks Allison P for your feedback
Lkumar_lyft (2024-07-24 10:46:16+00:00): Hi Allison P, I’m Lalit and I’m a mapper in the OSM team at Lyft.

Thanks for bringing this to our attention  I made these changes because there was a missing road detected in aerial imagery, so I thought that road could be prolonged . However, I see now that there is no street level imagery to verify that it has the same name.
I appreciate you taking the time to fix the inaccuracy and provide your insights.

Best regards,
Lalit
thefabi (2024-07-26 17:46:39+00:00): Hi,
This hydrant already exists https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1235873256. 

For adding new ones please use fire hydrant tags as described in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:emergency%3Dfire_hydrant

In addition, with emergency=fire_hydrant you do not need the name tag, unless it has an explicit name see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names

In Addition, Spanish names are usually not tagged as name in Germany. If there should be a Spanish name, there is name:es for it. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Localization
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-10 01:33:31+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164747491
streckenkundler (2024-07-24 17:22:26+00:00): Ich putze dir mal wieder hinterher...
Zu Tropical hab ich eine Meldung beim Geomaerker aufgemacht. Du bist dir da ja zu fein dazu und der Meinung, das würde nichts bringen... Es bringt was!

knatschige Grüße... :(

PS: zum wiederholten mal: Nutze endlich mal die freigegebenen Daten und halte dich an die Standards!
streckenkundler (2024-07-24 19:15:23+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4349351
LockOnGuy (2024-07-24 08:44:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by changeset 154338729 and the changeset comment is: Revert changeset 154330439 when a user added the name of the cafe shop to the street as self adv.
Alex Basau (2024-10-01 02:28:00+00:00): Hi there,

Thank you for your contributions to the trails in Mt. Tabor Park! I agree that bikes can pose a danger to pedestrians on some of the trails. However, it's important that OpenStreetMap accurately reflects legality, even if it seems counterintuitive. For instance, cycling on freeways is allowed in Oregon (except in specific areas like Portland and Medford per OAR 734-020-0045), even though it's dangerous.

According to the official park map (https://www.portland.gov/documents/mt-tabor-park-trail-mappdf), only a couple of trails are closed to bicycles. So, if bicycles aren't explicitly prohibited on a trail, they should be considered allowed.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle is a great resource for guidelines on mapping bicycle infrastructure. You might find AI tools like ChatGPT helpful for quick questions or clarifications as well.

That being said, not all trails should simply be tagged with bicycle=yes. Steep trails or trails that are too technical can be tagged with mtb=yes instead. Furthermore, if a trail ends in steps, or if it's covered in woodchips, too narrow, it might not be necessary to add a bicycle tag at all, as those footways aren't very suitable for cycling. But, at the same time, cycling isn't prohibited there. So they shouldn't have bicycle=no tags.

Thanks again for contributing to OSM, and I hope you’ll consider reverting the changes.

Alex
Alex Basau (2024-10-22 04:48:38+00:00): Hi again! I'll revert this change and other similar changes. Please see my previous comment for more info.

Alex
Michaela Barton (2024-08-01 20:05:40+00:00): I am reverting this changeset because, according to local regulations, bicycles are legally permitted on all segments that were incorrectly tagged as bicycle=no. This tag inaccurately restricts bicycle access where it is actually allowed.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154709602
Frans S (2024-07-25 10:54:16+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
A: Inaccurate mapping. Often oversized.
E: Buildings not squared.
G: Included the shadow of the building .



Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154330926
16517362 (2024-07-24 04:54:20+00:00): there are 3 fixed + 1 dome camera, how to add proper relation to this section?
BCNorwich (2024-07-24 05:28:00+00:00): Hi, I've removed a few unnecessary park nodes from the park area.

Regards Bernard.
neuhausr (2024-07-24 21:58:26+00:00): I see you added a connecting way from the bridge to 40th, but didn't add that way to the Riverlake Greenway bike route relation. The relation already routed over the footway and small chunk of 2nd Ave (essentially the other two sides of the triangle formed by your new way). I think either way could work, but probably would make sense to do one or the other. If you're not sure, it might be worth asking some other local users who edit bike infrastucture (like Jordan Leick?) or on the OSM US Slack. Happy mapping!
scrambling_panda (2024-07-25 02:51:34+00:00): Oh thanks for pointing that out, I didn't notice that when I added it. Yeah, I tried to find guidance on the wiki about adding something like that but it's so specific I didn't really manage to. I'll reach out on the OSM US slack. Thank you!
scrambling_panda (2024-07-25 04:38:35+00:00): After discussion, I removed the way I added and tweaked the tags on the existing ways: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154374874
neuhausr (2024-07-25 14:53:51+00:00): Great you connected with folks there!
Anastasiya_Vakulich (2024-11-29 05:53:02+00:00): #mapbox_roads_attributes
Anastasiya_Vakulich (2024-11-29 05:53:11+00:00): #mapbox_roads_attributes
Piotr_Sp (2024-07-26 09:01:53+00:00): Dlaczego usunął Pan elementy, które ja naniosłem na mapę? 
Byłem w tym terenie kilkanaście razy i posiadam punkty GPS na bazie których  dokonałem zmian powierzchni zbiornika i zwałowisk.
Piotr_Sp (2024-07-26 09:02:52+00:00): Zbiornik jest obecnie zasypywany, a ul. Składowa jest nieprzejezdna.

Proszę wycofać swoje zmiany.
Dawid2849 (2024-07-26 11:03:00+00:00): Wycofałem:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154437067
Allison P (2024-07-27 07:38:12+00:00): You have added multiple misspelled churches. The correct name is "The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints".
wielandb (2024-08-10 19:14:19+00:00): Hey :)

Dieser Änderungssatz scheint valide Daten entfernt (LKW-Zugang) und falsche Daten (Fahrradstraße) eingefügt zu haben.

Zumindest, wie ich es auf den Mapillary-Bildern erkennen konnte. Hat es sich seit 2020 geändert?
wielandb (2024-08-10 19:19:26+00:00): Update: Auch auf Google StreetView-Fotos vom Mai 2022 ist die Situation, wie ich sie auf Mapillary vorgefunden habe.
bicyclett (2024-08-10 19:57:10+00:00): Hi,
bin da Ende Juli 24 vorbeigefahren und hab auch ein Foto vom neuen Schild gemacht. 
(Schicke ich dir per Direktnachricht, weil kriege das hier nicht hoch und bei Mapillary ohne Geo-Exif auch nicht.)
Schöne Grüße
wielandb (2024-08-10 20:13:40+00:00): Habe das Bild bekommen.
Sehr interessant, hätte nicht gedacht dass sich das so geändert hat. 
Ich trage dann mal noch den Teil mit den Gespannfuhrwerken ein, und dann müsste es eigentlich komplett sein.

Viele Grüße
Anastasiya_Vakulich (2024-11-29 05:53:23+00:00): #mapbox_roads_attributes
user_7130456 (2024-08-10 16:22:30+00:00): 你修改边界的时候，记得检查行政区划关系中边界路径是否闭合，关系在路径的最下方，不然会破坏行政区划数据
SekeRob (2024-07-25 06:23:25+00:00): Hi,

Your one word "fix" (what? (Visit the good comments wiki!), shows a lot of broken area outlines. See OSMI https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=14.24910&lat=45.41686&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.50&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

As for breaks in forest that pass pipelines, powerlines, fire breaks etc there's the man_made=cutline tag (571,000x used) https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/man_made=cutline#overview with a dozen types which will render a nice grass like line through forests and scrub. Makes mapping those quite a bit simpler... just draw a line parallel to the powerline, pipeline, ski piste and done you are.

ciao

Sample cutlines https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154376601#map=18/41.84357/14.07367
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-07-24 21:15:33+00:00): Please fix https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3751030973
PripetRiver (2024-07-26 08:04:32+00:00): Hello Spaghetti Monster:spaghetti:, I will look to update the information for the tags accurately since I didn’t do that originally when I was updating the geometry. Thanks again for the feedback and happy mapping
KKaxft (2024-07-24 08:36:28+00:00): added street Poziomkowa - this street has a "U" shape, thats why 2 Pozimkowa street next to each other.
eggie (2024-07-24 06:52:18+00:00): Dag FLupie   Dat werkt zo niet in OSM.
Je krunt wel groeperen, maar zonder de adressen zelf te veranderen. Ze liggen als cluster boven op elkaar.
Dit is wat je er nu van hebt gemaakt 
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=154333626

Dit is ook bijna niet te doen met editor iD. 

Denk beter terugdraaien.
Groet
eggie
eggie (2024-07-24 06:56:57+00:00): reverted by changeset #154334515
Je kunt de cluster met al die adressen wel bij meer bij de hoofdingangen leggen. Dat is makkelijk voor bezorgdiensten.
Let op dat je de nodes niet aan elkaar plakt. Gebruik bij bewerken de linker alttoets. Dat voorkomt plakken.
Geen adressen veranderen. Het is allemaal import vanuit het Kadaster.
Bij periodieke updates gaat het anders fout.

MVG
eggie
FLupie (2024-07-24 07:00:40+00:00): Dus voor elke hoofdingang een nieuwe losse node aanmaken en daar de adres range invullen?
eggie (2024-07-24 07:00:56+00:00): De adresclusters heb ik dichter bij de Maashaven N.z. gezet.
eggie (2024-07-24 07:04:06+00:00): Nee... Die adresranges werken niet bij een zoekslag.
Wanneer iemand een adres intypte is het gewoon te vinden ergens in die cluster. 
Je kunt wel de hoofdingangen intekenen. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:entrance%3Dmain
De node verbind je dan met de gebouwomtrek. Dan zet je daar de hele cluster bij. Dat werkt het beste bij een zoekslag.
eggie (2024-07-24 07:06:34+00:00): Voorbeeld van een zoekslag
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9271816737

En dan kom je daar dus uit.
De adressen hoeven ook niet zichtbaar te zijn.
Toevallig laat Carto ze wel zien, maar dat heeft geen zin hier, want het is een cluster van losse adressen. 
Andere kaarten laten helemaal geen adressen zien, maar ze zijn wel vindbaar.
eggie (2024-07-24 07:07:56+00:00): Er is ook gezocht naar andere manieren met behulp van relaties, maar dat werkt in de praktijk niet.
eggie (2024-07-24 07:11:15+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses

Er is geen consensus!
Wij in Nederland wijken af omdat we importeren. Dat combineren met ;  doen we zeker niet.
Beter gewoon de BAG laten voor wat het is.
FLupie (2024-07-24 07:16:52+00:00): Hmm, ik dacht dat - omdat slechts een paar huisnummers zichtbaar zijn - de andere huisnummers helemaal niet ingevoerd zijn, maar zoals ik het nu begrijp zijn die min of meer 'verborgen' maar wel degelijk ingevoerd in OSM. 
De mogelijkheid om 1 of meerdere main entrances toe te voegen met die nummer reeksen is dan meer een verduidelijking. 
Ik zal eens beginnen met JOSM te gaan downloaden en daar wat mee leren werken.
eggie (2024-07-24 07:17:19+00:00): Even gekeken met rampeditor iD  (Gebruik ik nooit) . Dan kun je niet eens zien dat er -tig adresnodes boven op elkaar liggen.
Het lijkt één node maar het zijn er tientallen. Die zijn in dat rijtje (lijkt één node) zo geïmporteerd. 
Wanneer je josm zou installeren dan zie je wat ik bedoel.
eggie (2024-07-24 07:19:10+00:00): https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/editor-josm-stap-voor-stap/75047

Succes!
eggie (2024-07-24 07:24:23+00:00): Ik zie in dat draadje dat ik in 2016 pas ben overgestapt van Potlatch2 naar JOSM. Die editor liep doorlopend vast, maar is nu eigenlijk de standaardeditor voor de ervaren mappers. 
Editor iD is pas veel later gekomen en is niet echt geschikt om ingewikkelde dingen te doen. 
De meesten zijn met Potlatch begonnen.
FLupie (2024-07-24 14:07:25+00:00): Ik heb zojuist wat 1e aanpassingen vanuit JOSM geüpload. Zou jij daar naar willen kijken of dat goed gaat, omdat het een eerste (deel)aanpassing is van wat wegen in de wijk waarin ik bezig ben? 
Het was een beetje proberen, dus hoop dat het goed gegaan is. IN het weekend dan weer verder met volgende aanpassingen.
eggie (2024-07-24 14:22:17+00:00): Zal zo eens kijken.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-10 01:33:32+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164747491
Jordi MF (2024-07-24 08:39:25+00:00): Hola MaestroDash,

Gràcies per millorar la base de dades d'OSM. En aquesta pàgina de la wiki pots vore que hi ha una etiqueta per als centres culturals: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:community%20centre:

community_centre=cultural_centre

Salutacions
MaestroDash (2024-07-24 08:43:32+00:00): Gràcies Jordi, he vist que existeix pero a l'hora d'editar el lloc busque "Cultural" i no em troba res... No sé com fer per a buscar-ho
Jordi MF (2024-07-24 09:18:58+00:00): És normal. En OpenStreetMap s'utilitzen moltes etiquetes que no apareixen en les opcions predefinides de l'editor web. L'editor s'anomena iD i, realment, és un projecte independent d'OpenStreetMap. Per això, encara, no han inclòs totes les possibles etiquetes en el buscador. A més, hi ha moltes opcions que encara no s'han traduït i, per això, és possible que no les trobes.

Te recomane que modifiques les etiquetes 'manualment' encara que no aparega en el buscador. L'edició serà correcta. La wiki d'OSM (la web que t'he compartit) és el més important a l'hora d'afegir informació.

Si en algun moment vols, en Telegram tenim un grup de valencians i un altre de la comunitat espanyola. Si tens algun dubte, allí pots preguntar el que vulgues.

Salut
JezCrow (2024-08-07 15:47:06+00:00): Hi Robert, this is not Aldi. I can't remember off the top of my head what shops are here now, but Aldi built a brand new building (and substation) adjacent to this one.
JezCrow (2024-08-07 15:48:09+00:00): Sorry, I meant Rupert.
Rupert Swarbrick (2024-08-07 16:40:51+00:00): Oh drat. Sorry about that. Would you mind opening a change that drops the name from the way?
nona mostafa (2024-07-25 13:48:58+00:00): Hello H2Olima00,
I noticed you added "access=no" for the main road, which led to many streets being marked as inaccessible and unable to connect with other streets. After reviewing the latest satellite images, we found no restrictions that would warrant marking this street as "access=no."
We have removed the access tags from this street to make routing available there.
Could you please share the reason for adding this tag and the source that you used?
Regards,
nona mostafa
H2Olima00 (2024-07-25 21:45:19+00:00): Es una carretera que solo es accesible por los servicios de vigilancia de policía de fronteras. No accesible sin autorización.
nona mostafa (2024-07-28 06:52:22+00:00): Hello H2Olima00;
Thank you for your comment,
 but if we added "access=no" that means the branch streets from these ways will also have "access=no" to avoid these streets not floating:
Examples:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1013503629
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1013503628
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1013503630
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/249760492
Does this match the reality in this area? appreciate your local knowledge in this area.
Regards
nona mostafa
ChromeLotus (2024-07-30 19:38:59+00:00): Hello GrabID_Utami Gendis, 
I noticed a jersey barrier was added to a segment of the secondary roundabout (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/675198862). Is this barrier feature in OSM intended to model a divide between two opposing oneway lanes as seen in Mapillary (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-6.109019999999987&lng=106.73932439999999&z=17&pKey=312146917822785&focus=photo)? If so, it may be better to model as a feature separated linear feature between the two highway features - (linear barrier features are acceptable via OSMWiki - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Djersey_barrier). 

The current modeling as a node-based barrier member of that way will block routing clock-wise around this roundabout for many users of OSM. If the barrier is intended to block travel on this roundabout, do you have updated resources to share for this change? That would be very helpful. Thanks and I look forward to hearing from you.
frosm (2024-09-09 18:49:14+00:00): il y a 2 agences immobilières l'une a coté de l'autre ? vous n'avez peut-être pas vu la première étant donné que vous l'aviez mal tagé, erreur que je viens de corriger
et c'est au numéro 7 ? car vous l'avez mis dans la partie de batiment 7bis
NieWnen (2024-07-25 17:42:26+00:00): Proszę nie zmieniaj tagowania z `path` na `cycleway`...

`highway=path` było poprawne i jest rekomendowanym sposobem na tagowanie ścieżek pieszo-rowerowych.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Rowery#Drogi_dla_pieszych_i_rower%C3%B3w

To dotyczy tej, jak i innych zmian.
eggie (2024-07-24 07:29:32+00:00): Hi Please use the present addressnode.
No space in postcode format.
I merged your info
Greetz
eggie
Elizen (2024-07-24 09:46:45+00:00): Здравствуйте. Пожалуйста, не дублируйте значение из addr:housenumber в name.
Ekaterina_sev (2024-07-24 09:55:58+00:00): Здравствуйте, хорошо.
Frans S (2024-07-30 08:52:23+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 
However, a few buildings not squared.
 Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154336923
martianfreeloader (2024-10-08 19:28:09+00:00): Hi,
Do you think this is restored now?
https://www.osm.org/way/1303421854
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-07-25 22:03:32+00:00): This changeset reversed a motorway. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1074337216/history/9
Have you removed the reverse shortcut in JOSM like I suggested??
DimplePatel (2024-07-26 03:08:02+00:00): Yes, I have removed the reverse shortcut as you suggested. I made sure to do this before starting again in JOSM.
NieWnen (2024-07-24 19:56:17+00:00): Cześć,

Jezdnie wlotowe/wylotowe nie powinny łączyć się ze sobą tak jak:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1219861786
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1219861785
w punkcie https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/527875822

może to powodować m.in. złe interpretowanie przez nawigacje – mogą traktować to jako zwykłe skrzyżowanie sugerując skręt w prawo, a nie jako pierwszy zjazd na rondzie.

Taki sposób tagowania jest dopuszczalny w przypadku wyjątków, tj. kiedy da się skręcić bez wjazdu na rondo (rzadko, ale się zdarza).
scai (2025-01-26 12:39:49+00:00): Hi,

you added several separate footways in this changeset. At the bridge Avenue Jean Jaurès you duplicated the already existing shared footway/cycleway, I remove this part again. On the east side of this bridge your footway lacked the bridge and layer tag, I've added both.

Regards
Alex