piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
MxxCon (2024-02-28 01:27:53+00:00): Hello.
What is this feature when it's not ice rink? Which months is it operational?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147912227
JakkoLantern4 (2024-02-28 23:59:29+00:00): It would be an open field when it is not a rink. the rink itself opens from Nov 1 to Mar 3. Not really sure how I can put this on the map though.
MxxCon (2024-02-29 00:36:51+00:00): I updated tag to indicate that
Allison P (2024-02-26 00:05:59+00:00): The housenumbers are shared with the house up the street? That seems strange.
Jarrardi (2024-02-27 02:12:16+00:00): Yes, I thought so too, but when I walked by yesterday, it was clearly written on the mailboxes, and the side of the house up the street. Everything on the north side of Idaho Street has a mailbox in a single clustered location, which may have something to do with it?
I'll inquire further when I can find someone who both lives there and is willing to talk.
Jarrardi (2024-02-27 23:49:22+00:00): Okay, new rule, I'm not allowed to do house numbers. I have no idea where I got that other number, or why I was so sure of it even while staring at the mailboxes. The number is definitely 321. I went there again today and stayed staring at the numbers for a full minute to see if they'd change. 😅
Thanks again so much for your help and patience!
Allison P (2024-02-28 01:13:40+00:00): Hey, don't stress about it. That's why it's a collaborative map. Middleton didn't have much in the way of addresses (or much of anything at all, really) before you came along.

If you're interested in adding a lot of address data, you could consider asking Canyon County to relicense and offer for free their address dataset and either importing it or using it as another data source. Having that data has been immensely helpful for mapping Ada County. I've noticed a lot of misnamed and non-existent roads because I was able to compare them with the address data.
kucai (2025-07-01 12:30:12+00:00): why would you prefer a cycleway (primary for bicycles) instead of highway path + motorcycle ? Any bicycles using this side road/path is basically asking for an accident.
rene78 (2025-07-01 12:37:04+00:00): Looks like it already is mapped as a path. Don't think I have ever mapped motorycle paths as highway=bicycle (I think...)
une abeille (2024-07-10 02:06:46+00:00): Business does not appear to have a storefront here. I am removing this POI in my next changeset. OSM is for places that can actually be visited.
neuhausr (2024-02-26 16:21:34+00:00): Hi, thanks for your interest in adding data to OpenStreetMap! It appears you may be importing Anoka County parcel data. If so, please review the Imports webpage on the OSM wiki before continuing (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import) This process is meant to ensure the effort you put in is worthwhile for everyone. For example, I'm noticing you're including some non-OSM tags from the source data, and probably using the improper tag for each feature (see place=plot https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dplot). The OSM US slack may also be a helpful place to get advice. Happy mapping!
Glassman (2024-02-28 17:38:05+00:00): It looks like you accidentally added a duplicate road. I removed the duplicate and changed the remaining home to highway=residential.
Glassman (2024-02-28 17:39:39+00:00): We don't post personal information so I removed the Lennar Daybreak home name on both buildings.

They also seemed way too big so I made them smaller. Hopefully we'll get some updated imagery soon so you can draw them to size.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-13 03:58:06+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164878528
Niquarl (2025-08-16 09:31:53+00:00): Hello, I noticed you seem to have added language:br to Pare de Sofrer (https://www.osm.org/way/212238899). Is this really the case, br is for Breton or brezhoneg and I'm surprised to see a church wich has this tag in the USA.
Rassilon (2025-08-16 13:30:05+00:00): Sorry I think I was confusing it with another organization's language code for Brazilian Portuguese
Niquarl (2025-08-17 19:04:46+00:00): I think Brazillian Portuguese is just pt in OSM.
I changed it: osm.org/changeset/170582860
fortera_au (2024-02-26 02:28:53+00:00): Hi, is this definitely a residential road, or is it just a driveway for a subdivided property?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147913778
ZSK6XTZZGY (2024-02-26 03:18:42+00:00): hello, thank you for your reply and i will change it accordantly.
ZSK6XTZZGY (2024-02-26 03:24:46+00:00): It was a driveway so thank you for noticing.
Ewen Hill (2024-03-01 09:00:09+00:00): Hi, This does not appear to be a track, more an ally or pathway
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147913824
Ewen Hill (2024-03-01 09:00:10+00:00): Hi, This does not appear to be a track, more an ally or pathway
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147913824
Ewen Hill (2024-03-01 08:59:02+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM - This a appears to be a private road and the road should be set to access=private if you could do this please.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147913869
Ewen Hill (2024-03-01 08:58:04+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM - This a appears to be a private road and the road should be set to access=private if you could do this please.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147913917
TomPar (2024-02-28 05:52:49+00:00): Hello.  Thanks for pointing this out.  I had mapped a lot of this a few years ago when I was a less experienced mapper.  Some insight:

Indeed, the previous multipolygon for "Royalston State Forest" included both DCR and private CR parcels.  On the MassGIS OpenSpace data for the private CRs, there is this piece of metadata: FORMAL_SITE_NAME = Royalston State Forest.  I erroneously assumed the private CRs were also known as "Royalston State Forest".  I didn't realize there are signs that identify the private CRs as separate things.

However, the multiple adjacent private CRs are not all known as "Beals & Fleet National Bank CR".  Your recent edit labeled all as such because I previously mapped the private CRs as a single multipolgon.  Before, there was a multipolgon for the DCR parcels and a single multipolygon for the private CRs.  And then a bigger multipolygon that had all the above parcels named "Royalston State Forest".  Could be confusing!...especially if you're a new mapper.

I just redefined things so "Royalston State Forest" is JUST the DCR owned parcels.  I will go back soon to redefine the smaller private CRs and name them per what I see in MassGIS OpenSpace layer.

Please let me know if you have any on-the-ground info that may differ from the MassGIS OpenSpace data...I find it's sometimes not up-to-date.  I'm happy to collaborate to ensure this beautiful part of the state is properly mapped.  Cheers.
map per (2024-03-20 16:21:53+00:00): REVERTED
map per (2024-03-21 18:42:53+00:00): Hello Batman Maps,

when using the editing functionality of Maps.me your changes are uploaded to the public OpenStreetMap database. Please do not use this functionality to add personal notes, as this information is not relevant for other users. E.g. don't upload places like "Home - Isabel".

Thanks and best regards
map per

PS: Feel free to contact me if you have any questions
Kovoschiz (2024-02-28 09:24:30+00:00): Reverted /changeset/147922918,147914469 Shatin mountains: Needs more discussion

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148004479
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-31 15:17:14+00:00): What you meant by this fixme you created here?

Have you wanted to mark https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/558364057 ?
Kovoschiz (2024-02-26 06:33:37+00:00): Please don't delete other things without a reason. And not repeatedly. They exist for good reason.
Kovoschiz (2024-02-26 06:34:00+00:00): 2. Please don't add redundant info in the `branch=`
Kovoschiz (2024-02-26 06:35:50+00:00): 3. `website=` is only used for a unique page of a facility. At most `brand:website=` is used. It should rather be retrieved from the `brand:wikidata=` . 
4. I have already added `ref=` . `note=` is for notes in editing only. It's not for public use.
Kovoschiz (2024-02-26 06:37:25+00:00): 5. Smoking bans indoors is a law. These defaults for a country don't need to be added.
blackboxlogic (2024-02-28 16:32:08+00:00): Having address tags without a house number is meaningless.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses#Addresses_without_house_numbers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147914617
CurlingMan13 (2024-05-05 06:54:16+00:00): I encourage you to review the address added.  You added addresses to random nodes on a house?  Something is off.

For example, some of the nodes on this house:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1208197817
TheDutchMan13 (2024-05-06 01:44:34+00:00): It's fixed. Thank you for letting me know.
Kovoschiz (2024-02-26 06:53:49+00:00): There's no reason to remove these if you aren't updating further. If you don't explain yourself and continue to do this, I will suspect you of removing competitor info in a conflict of interest.
Ewen Hill (2024-03-01 08:57:42+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM - This a appears to be a private road and the road should be set to access=private if you could do this please due to the biosecurity risk
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147915120
Xvtn (2024-02-29 22:55:38+00:00): Hi! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes here. Everything looks good to me, no complaints! Thanks for your contributions!
elsy1 (2024-04-12 18:50:13+00:00): دوست محترم بلوار داخل شهر که بزرگراه نیست و از وسط شهر گذر میکنه به هیچ عنوان صلاحیت دریافت تگ ترانک نداره. حتما جواب کامنت رو بدید وگرنه گزارش میشید
CoyKoi (2024-02-26 20:30:14+00:00): Hey kiwiiwik, Yes this correction is perfect, thanks :)
emersonveenstra (2024-03-01 14:18:13+00:00): Hi there,

I've fixed all of these, but in the future, motor vehicle access tagging uses motor_vehicle, not motorvehicle
Warin61 (2024-03-02 00:06:35+00:00): Hi
Muiltipolygon relation 17269480 (garden) does not meet the 'rules' - duplicated segment. As this only has outers .. why does it need to be a relation at all??? 

I have placed the relevant tags on the outer ways, and then deleted the relation... Job done.
mrpulley (2024-12-13 10:22:13+00:00): Confirming that maxspeed is correct here (checked on survey)
yurinchi (2024-02-26 05:19:19+00:00): source servey
hatul (2024-05-23 10:43:00+00:00): שלום לירון
תודה על הוספת הברז.
זה הברז במצפה אודי? יש לך אולי תמונות של המצפה שתוכל להוסיף למפה?
Xvtn (2024-02-29 22:53:15+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes here. Everything looks great, except that building:levels shouldn't be 0. It's my understanding that building:levels describes how many above-ground floors there are, so something like this should be at least 1. Let me know if you have any questions, and thanks for your contribution!
4004 (2024-04-19 22:29:19+00:00): hi Brentar, not sure if this was my error or yours, but some lane tags were copied to the new links on this junction going the other way (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/482277843)
Brentar (2024-04-23 03:57:12+00:00):  Hi 4004, 

I did the junction modelling here and corrected the lane count from 2 to 1 and retained the remaining tags. I can see you removed destination lane tags. The lane data is correct now according to the imagery. Let me know if you have more questions.
ds-09 (2024-02-26 06:39:55+00:00): Reviewed.
eggie (2024-02-26 09:53:31+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
olo81 (2024-02-28 20:42:40+00:00): Proszę o uzupełnienie tagowania ścieżki rowerowej
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=construction?uselang=pl

I pytanie, czy ten przebieg jest czymś poparty, projektem?
nevw (2024-02-26 07:59:59+00:00): ...also extended Bulloo River to end using Geoscience Australia - Surface Hydrology Lines (Regional) and Esri World Imagery as sources.
muralito (2024-02-26 16:48:17+00:00): Hola Matias.
Delta del Tigre era anteriormente una localidad por si misma, que cuando se declaró la creacion de Ciudad del Plata, pasó a ser un barrio de esa ciudad, 

Creo que estaba todo bastante bien mapeado de antes de tus cambios, justamente porque se habia arrancado desde que Ciudad del Plata no existia como tal, y se habian mantenido los limites anteriores de cada barrio.
Matías_98 (2024-02-26 16:57:04+00:00): No entiendo bien lo que tratas de decirme. Delta el Tigre siempre fue la parte delta de Ciudad del Plata, ¿que estaría bien ahí? Que Delta el Tigre fuera toda Ciudad del Plata?
muralito (2024-02-26 18:05:53+00:00): Lo que quiero decir es que antes de que existiera Ciudad del Plata, Delta del Tigre y el resto de los barrios eran localidades separadas. En el mapa tambien, eran cosas separadas. Cuando se creo Delta del Tigre, todas esas localidades que eran distintas, pasaron a ser barrios de una unica ciudad. 

Delta del Tigre, sigue siendo el mismo Delta del Tigre de siempre, no cambiaron sus limites, pero antes era una localidad por si misma y ahora es un barrio de Ciudad del Plata, lo que cambio es como eso se refleja en el mapa. Cambio como se organiza la jerarquia.
muralito (2024-02-26 18:09:28+00:00): Ciudad del Plata es esta https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2690564
que tiene nivel 8 cliudad

y vos renombraste esta https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2690079
que tiene nivel 10 barrio, de Delta del Tigre a Ciudad del Plata
Matías_98 (2024-02-26 19:13:09+00:00): La que renombré, que sería exactamente, si Ciudad del Plata ya se encuentra marcado correctamente en el primer enlace que pasaste?
muralito (2024-02-27 02:27:14+00:00): Lo que habia antes era:
*Ciudad del Plata (nivel 8 ciudad)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2690564
y los barrios (nivel 10) eran 5 que se unieron para formar "Ciudad del Plata")
* Delta del Tigre (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2690079) que fue el que renombraste
* Playa Pascual https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2690183
* Monte Grande https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2688651
* Safici https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2690004
y 
* Santa Monica https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2690000

Lo que quiero entender es que es lo que querias corregir? Los barrios no son esos 5 que habia oficialmente?

Eso era segun los datos del INE, que es lo que usamos cuando las intendencias no tienen nada oficial.
Si hay algun nomenclator oficial de barrios de esa zona pasamelo que no lo he visto.
muralito (2024-02-27 02:36:45+00:00): Aca la IMSJ pone un plano de Ciudad del Plata, con muchos mas nombres, pero no los limites. Si tenes claro los limites o un plano que los tenga mas detallados vendrian bien. Si no, al no estar los limites claros igual se pueden mapear los barrios como puntos y se pone el punto en mas o menos en lo que se considere el centro de cada barrio.
Matías_98 (2024-02-28 01:37:51+00:00): Buenas noches muralito.

Si, efectivamente me basé en la información dada por el Municipio de Ciudad del Plata, soy oriundo de ahí, trabajo en la zona y uso constantemente el mapa, por eso la edición repentina, ya que en otros mapas digitales como Google Maps, no tienen actualizados algunos nombres de calles.

Actualmente, Ciudad del Plata consta oficialmente de 19 barrios, 4 de ellos son muy pequeños pero existen. Los cuales serían: Delta el Tigre, Safici, Villa Rives, San Fernando, Parque Postel, Autódromo, Penino, San Fernando Chico, Parque del Plata, Safici, Monte Grande,  Santa Mónica, Playa Pascual, Villa Olímpica, Santa Victoria, Las Violetas, San Luís, Santa María y Playa Linda.

Conozco los puntos de cada barrio.
Matías_98 (2024-02-28 05:41:41+00:00): Sofima* (Nombré dos veces Safici)
muralito (2024-02-28 18:17:59+00:00): OK. Entonces hay que hacer cambios que no son pocos, desarmar lo que hay ahora, y crear lo nuevo...

Voy a ver de hacer algunos de los barrios con los limites que me parezcan claros y te lo muestro y vemos si hay que ajustar.

Primero hay que hacer un nodo con etiqueta "place"="neigbourhood" por cada barrio (creo que no son tan grandes como para suburb). Eso iria ubicado en el centro del barrio, a veces centro como centro comercial, otras veces centro como centro de un area, en definitiva donde te parece que si mandas a alguien a tal barrio, ahi aproximadamante tiene que estar el nodo ubicado.

Despues como mejora, si estan claros, los limites exactos de cada barrio. Eso se hace con una relacion, que es otro tipo de elemento en OSM.

No se puede copiar nada de Google Maps o de algun plano que no este explicitamente habilitado, Tiene que ser conocimiento tuyo por ser de la zona, de los datos abiertos de Uruguay.
Matías_98 (2024-02-28 18:32:29+00:00): Gracias por la ayuda, podría ir haciendo los nodos y después los límites.
muralito (2024-02-28 18:46:24+00:00): Claro, empeza por los que no tengan costa al rio que tienen que ser mas faciles, porque en el rio hay limites de Ciudad del Plata y del departamento tambien,
aixbrick (2024-02-26 12:41:58+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OSM,
- die Haltestellen haben seit dem Fahrplanwechsel neue Namen (siehe https://www.aseag.de/aktuelles/detail/fahrplanwechsel-am-15-januar-2024). Möglicherweise hast du das nicht gewusst.
- Außerdem hast du das gesamte Grundstück der Schule als Gebäude getaggt.
Beides (Haltestellen und Schule) habe ich bereits korrigiert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147930016.
- Zu den Spielplätzen: "playground:theme" wird gesetzt, wenn der Spielplatz ein bestimmtes Thema hat, siehe Beispiele unter https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:playground:theme. "playground:theme=playground" sollte dabei nicht verwendet werden.
- Kleidercontainer werden über https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity=recycling abgebildet.
Bitte schaue dir das nochmal an.
Gruß
Dodko (2024-02-26 09:19:16+00:00): Aby sa tam dalo ubytovať je potrebná značka napríklad
tourism=chalet
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:tourism%3Dchalet
a dobré je pridať kontakt, telefón, mail, web
MxxCon (2024-02-28 01:46:46+00:00): Hello.
Do you have some supporting information about this street name? I understand that request came from your customer, but did they provide any information? Looking at the street imagery here I'm not seeing any street signs, and this looks like simply a driveway loop for these 2 apartment buildings.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147921465
Aleh Aliakseyenka (2024-02-29 07:09:57+00:00): Hi! A business owner has contacted us and referred us to a website that lists an address with this road name. If you are sure that the road is not named anything at all, please let us know.
tekim (2024-03-01 15:40:28+00:00): HI Aleh,  Could you provide us the link to the website that you used as a source?  If you are the one making the change it is your responsibility to provide a source, not to ask us to provide evidence that the name doesn't exist.
Aleh Aliakseyenka (2024-03-04 12:13:42+00:00): Rolled back the changes until the circumstances were clarified.
aceman444 (2024-08-31 10:03:34+00:00): Zdravim, na https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/52490470 ani ziadna budova ine je, tak preco je to bytovka?
Matus_M (2024-09-04 19:53:34+00:00): Zrejme omylom som označil. Pardón
Marek-M (2024-02-26 10:01:12+00:00): Droga dojazdowa nie powinna mieć nazwy jeżeli budynki przy niej mają tą 
samą nazwę ulicy jak droga główna.
kornad (2024-02-26 10:52:25+00:00): Ok
aharvey (2024-06-26 03:45:41+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1254815681 I can't see any footpath here, with nothing on the ground I would suggest we delete this one. Thoughts?
Lockstar (2024-06-26 04:30:20+00:00): Agreed - placed in error, should be deleted.  Thanks.
aharvey (2024-06-26 04:45:29+00:00): done
eggie (2024-02-26 10:49:54+00:00): Dag Gasbij Lijkt me oke.
Dit is de laatste satfoto
https://www.satellietdataportaal.nl/?base=openstreetmap&res=0.3%2C0.5&datemin=26-02-2023&loc=52.68902%2C5.166943%2C18z&overlay=mos-0&marker=loc&acqdate=2023-11-30&acqid=20231130_105624_PNEO-04_1_48&sensor=Pleiades-NEO

Wellicht kan de landuse=construction langs het water ook al weg.
MVG
eggie
Gasbij (2024-02-26 11:08:13+00:00): Dank! De twee wandelbruggetjes zijn nog niet zichtbaar op het laatste satellietbeeld, maar die liggen er sinds december.

Ja, zou op zich al weg kunnen, maar deze strook ligt nu nog half braak. Er wordt op dit stuk binnenkort nog een groenstrook incl. wandelpad aangelegd die loopt van noord naar zuid. Dit wandelpad verbindt dan aan de twee nieuwe wandelbruggetjes.
Robert Whittaker (2024-03-25 22:55:36+00:00): Hi,

In this changeset, you edited the node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7065117081 , changing it from an amenity=bank named "Lloyds Bank" to a shop=optician named "Specsavers". However, you left brand=* and brand:*=* tags still referring to Looyds Bank.

Can I check that you did indeed intend to remap a former Lloyds Bank as now being a Specsavers optician? If so those brand tags could do with being updated too.
tswsl (2024-03-31 19:30:29+00:00): Thanks for the nudge about the brand tags - I hadn't spotted them when making the initial change. A downside to making changes from a mobile!
I've just edited the node again, so everything should be consistent now.
Robert Whittaker (2024-04-03 09:36:09+00:00): Great thanks!
AgusQui (2024-03-17 03:45:06+00:00): No es lo mismo telepass que telepase, por favor evitar hacer cambios masivos sin antes consultar a la comunidad local
simo_explorer (2024-03-18 16:05:30+00:00): I'm sorry for the change, I had to ask for information. In the whole world there were only 16 entities, the key had appeared on a quality control portal; documentation should be written to explain this key.  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:payment:*
AgusQui (2024-04-07 23:47:00+00:00): Ok, pero en esa wiki tampoco está telepass
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-09 04:47:42+00:00): Removed SEO spam POI with promotional and malformed tags that doesn't exist on the ground near the given location in a residential area, in changeset 183855720

https://osm.org/changeset/183855720
YomanNH (2024-02-26 09:58:40+00:00): Cześć,
zauważyłem, że źle zmieniłeś przejścia+przejazdy rowerowe. Były one prawidłowo zmapowane jako highway=path + path=crossing.
pandamahoniowa (2024-02-26 12:00:42+00:00): mea culpa, już cofnąłem; dziękuję za zwrócenie uwagi i czujność
nurdafur (2025-02-03 11:56:59+00:00): Hallo Marcus
In diesem Changeset hast du ein kleines Stück Radweg ergänzt. Dadurch würden die Radrouten richtungsgetrennt. Du hast hier das zusätzliche Segment korrekt den Routen zugefügt. Dabei hast du jedoch vergessen, den Segmenten die nun fehlenden forward/backward-tags zu zu fügen. Auch hast du die Segmente nicht sortiert.
Dies habe ich nun angepasst.
Liebe Grüsse und weiterhin viel Spass beim Kartografieren. 
Urs
Marcus Fihlon (2025-02-03 11:59:05+00:00): Danke! Das mit forward/backward habe ich mittlerweile auch gelernt.
CaldeiraG (2024-02-26 09:32:28+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147626193
mgerken (2024-02-26 09:55:52+00:00): Ursprünglicher Changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147828913
eggie (2024-02-26 09:59:53+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback  Let even op de foutmeldingen
Bv warnings:crossing_ways:building-highway
  	2
Er loopt een trap door een gebouw.
covered=yes? 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community