piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
_JOR-Services (2023-07-27 10:25:14+00:00): Diese ist im Gebäude.
Aber da das Gelände mit der Hausnummer sehr weitläufig ist, gebietet sich die Marke zwischen dem möglichen Parkplatz und dem alleingültigen Eingang 1 zu setzten.
highflyer74 (2023-07-27 14:43:57+00:00): Moin und willkommen _JOR-Services!

POIs werden immer ungefähr dort im Gebäude platziert, wo sie sich auch in Wirklichkeit befinden. Ein Parkplatz ist ein separates Objekt. Schau dir gern einmal https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice an.

Da das Gebäude mehrere Adressen zu haben scheint (im Südosten liegt dieser Node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3761972790 mit Adresse der Köhlstraße), könnte / sollte man sie nicht am Gebäude erfassen, sondern die Eingänge (entrance=yes / https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:entrance) mit dem Gebäudeumriss verbinden und die Adressdaten dort verorten. Danach nicht vergessen, die Adressdaten vom Gebäude zu entfernen.

Falls du Hilfe brauchst bzw. dich nicht so tief ins Thema einarbeiten möchtest, kann ich das machen, wenn du mir genau beschreibst, wo die Eingänge zu den Adressen genau sind.

Paketdienste, welche in deinem Fall versagen, arbeiten vielleicht nicht mit OSM-Daten ;-)

Viele Grüße!
nevw (2023-07-27 09:08:19+00:00): Hi
the name= tag is not used for street numbers
Please use the addr tags instead
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:*
arjunaraoc (2023-07-30 11:38:42+00:00): I have updated tags for some of your edits via  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139205965
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139075381
arjunaraoc (2023-07-30 11:39:55+00:00): Please provide detailed changset comments like "added buildings and features in <place name>"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139075381
fire (2026-05-01 09:16:56+00:00): This recycling bin is private. Please delete it.
user_17222985 (2023-07-27 09:35:53+00:00): https://t.me/DecolonizationUkraine/7634
Filip009 (2023-08-28 12:29:06+00:00): Dobrý deň, dávate si pozor na spájanie cesty a hranice. Najlepšie ako sa tomu vyvarovať je skryť hranicu. Pri editovaní v pravej časti je "mapové údaje" (klávesová skratka "U"). Potom rozkliknúť mapové objekty a kliknúť na hranice, tak aby tam políčko nebolo zaškrtnuté.

Skryte si tie hranice už konečne, nebaví ma to stále po vás opravovať. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11070839559/history
user_5359 (2023-07-27 09:55:18+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I remove your SEO SPAM (mostly foreign keys).
NorthCrab_upload (2023-07-27 09:30:17+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11070837663
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/232393643

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2023-07-27 09:30:19+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11070852546
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/232393644

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2023-07-27 09:30:20+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11070843633
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/232393645

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Vinber-Pro (2023-07-28 08:52:40+00:00): J'ai un doute sur le nom ? est-ce vraiment pépinière géante ou est-ce une description ?
Rom1 (2023-07-27 10:30:35+00:00): Bonjour, je sais qu'il n'y a pas encore de consensus au sujet des adresses mais pourrais-tu stp ne pas mettre l'adresse comme un attribut d'un polygone du bâti. Tu peux constater que dans les environs nous sommes plusieurs à privilégier un noeud à l'interface entre les domaines public et privé (soit par exemple un portail, une porte qui donne sur la rue...). Merci et bonne continuation !
constcyr (2023-07-28 13:30:17+00:00): Bonjour Romain. Je vais tâcher (voir VIGNEULLES).
mcliquid (2023-07-27 09:41:16+00:00): wow, thats a massive changeset in terms of size. please save more often when you change your virtual location. this changeset spans over the globe and makes a quality assurance more complicated. thanks!
Baloo Uriza (2023-07-27 11:47:52+00:00): Please stop tagging destination:lanes until after you've driven in the US; these values aren't accurate.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139076821
A_Prokopova_lyft (2023-07-28 15:06:36+00:00): Hi Baloo Uriza,
The destination:lanes tag was added based on the Lyft owned image: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1PrXvTa_72WZlUp0eExS6oHRjzqXyH0vn/view?usp=sharing and accordingly to this sign the value was added correctly. Could you please explain your decision to remove and what exact you find inaccurate about our way of adding destination:lanes tag?
Best regards!
Baloo Uriza (2023-07-29 01:07:34+00:00): Literally nobody familiar with US signage would come up with such an interpretation for the signage available.
map per (2023-07-27 10:39:41+00:00): Concerning review_requested:
Yes, there was a map data error. I fixed it.

Best regards
map per
Bear-in-a-box (2023-09-20 07:55:17+00:00): This is indeed one of the few parts where cycling is forbidden. Please don't put the same information to other parts of the Domein which is just not true
AntiCompositeNumber (2026-05-18 14:01:58+00:00): Are you sure the spur off of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5977681055 is abandoned? At higher zoom levels, Esri World Imagery sometimes falls back to the much-older Esri Clarity imagery. All other imagery sources show the tracks as in-use.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-31 19:47:58+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11070880738/history  - is it dormitory solely for students, for long-term stays?
dónal (2023-08-06 10:45:00+00:00): thanks for the update! You may be interested in the EveryDoor app which makes updating business info really easy. :)
eggie (2023-07-27 10:31:47+00:00): Welkom bij OSM.
Bedankt voor je bijdrage. Weet je ook de operator=....    Geldmaat?

MVG
eggie
Simon Ermler (2023-07-28 17:52:06+00:00): Hello,

I updated the entry. Yes the Operator ist geldmaat.
Greetings
Simon
eggie (2023-07-28 18:14:09+00:00): Spitze!
ChrissW-R1 (2023-07-27 10:14:14+00:00): https://osm.org/note/3799713
ccldns (2023-07-27 12:23:01+00:00): Suite des commentaires qui dépassaient le nb de car autorisés : je n'arrive pas à faire en sorte de prendre l'avenue sans faire de détour. Quelqu'un pourrait-il regarder ce qui cloche?
Barroszt (2023-10-19 21:03:09+00:00): Pomyłka

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142836845
NorthCrab_upload (2023-07-27 10:40:18+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4586600798
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/802024810

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
map per (2023-08-02 19:58:13+00:00): Wegen review_requested:
Nur die Öffnungszeiten zu löschen reicht nicht, um ein Cafe zu schließen. Aber audtr hat sich schon drum gekümmert und das Cafe auf 'disused' gesetzt (vgl. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/315953311/history)

Viele Grüße
map per
phoenixsaigon1698 (2023-08-03 10:50:54+00:00): Hello, what is the reason that you delete this relation? 
If you still work with Grab why you said "inactive" in your profile. 
Again, if you do not have any proof to delete this relation please do nothing harm!
Noktoborus (2023-07-27 17:33:34+00:00): New way looks strange: it is not connected to another vehicle roads. Could you describe which road were you trying to map?
MxxCon (2023-07-30 03:23:10+00:00): Hello.
Why did you map 1192623726 as a rectangle when it's clearly a round pool?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139079930
jacobwhall (2023-07-30 04:51:55+00:00): 1192623726 was once a round pool, yes! Clearly visible as round in Esri World Imagery (Clarity) and Mapbox Satellite in iD. However, this was one of many pools in this area that had clearly been removed or replaced between satellite image dates. Upon inspecting newer images (Bing Aerial in particular), I'm convinced there is a newer, rectangular pool. I could be mistaken, in which case you are welcome to make the adjustment. Either way, I think it's safe to say the round pool is no longer there.

Cheers,
Jacob
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139079930
MxxCon (2023-07-30 05:03:06+00:00): Hmm. For some reason when I was looking earlier at the vintage of imagery it told me that esri clarify was newer than bing. Now it shows otherwise. I do see the feature you are referring to in bing imagery, but i'm not sure if it's a covered up pool. Its perimeter looks too flat. I'd expect a fence or something else. To me it looks more like different paving on the ground. Maybe a volleyball court or a playground. But ultimately on the big G it is clearly visible as a pool. 😉👍
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139079930
jacobwhall (2023-07-30 05:21:25+00:00): > I'd expect a fence or something else. To me it looks more like different paving on the ground.

Yeah, I see what you mean. To me the crosshatch pattern looked like the ribs you'd see on a pool cover. Perhaps I was a bit far out on a limb...

> But ultimately on the big G it is clearly visible as a pool.

Not to be smug here but...I was totally right 😉 Thanks for checking my work, I always learn something about interpreting aerial imagery.
Senihtu (2026-04-27 09:17:24+00:00): Hallo!
Diese Änderung liegt schon eine ganze Weile zurück. Aber evtl. erinnerst Du Dich ja noch daran und kannst die Probleme beheben.
Du hast den Drosselweg in "An den Löcknitzwiesen" umbenannt.
w397617455 hat aber noch addr Drosselweg 3. Ein Ändern ist nicht so einfach möglich da genau gegenüber w396728646 mit adresse "An den Löcknitzwiesen" 3 versehen ist.

und dann gibt es da noch w397678842 mit addr:street=Im Hasenwinkel ohne das es irgendwo einen Hasenwinkel gäbe.
happy mapping!
chris66 (2026-04-27 19:30:29+00:00): Hi,
"im Hasenwinkel 2" ist nicht von mir, scheint es laut offiziellen Daten in der Tat hier nicht zu geben.

Der ALKIS Adressvergleich meldet in dieser Gegend nur "An den Löcknitzwiesen" 16 als Fehler -> muss wohl 1d heissen.

Drosselweg 3 gibt es laut ALKIS wohl nicht (mehr).

Mehr kann ich dazu leider nicht sagen. 
Grüße
Chris
MxxCon (2023-07-30 03:24:30+00:00): Hello.
Similar to the previous edit, why did you map 1192625196 as a rectangle when on the satellite imagery it's oval shaped?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139080250
jacobwhall (2023-07-30 04:59:13+00:00): Hey MxxCon, thanks for your comments on my pool geometry edits. This was another interesting case, so thanks for bringing it up.

Once again, I was convinced when I was editing this that the pool was once an oval but has since been replaced. When I was working on this project there were a number of pools that had been removed or replaced between when different satellite images had been taken.

In my experience, Bing imagery is often much more recent than Esri or Mapbox Satellite imagery (these were my viable options within the iD editor). In the Bing image there appeared to be a rectangular cover, so I assumed a rectangular pool. Again, many pools were different between images so this did not feel abnormal.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139080250
MxxCon (2023-07-30 05:06:45+00:00): In iD if you go into Background Settings panel, and enable "Show Background Panel" checkbox, it'll show you the age of satellite imagery, if it's available, so you can better figure out which one is the most recent.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139080250
jacobwhall (2023-07-30 05:34:21+00:00): > it'll show you the age of satellite imagery, if it's available

Thanks for this tip, I've used iD quite a lot and I never knew about this. Unfortunately few of the images have their vintages labeled.

The Bing Aerial is Oct '22, which is pretty recent. I suspect it's the most recent. I see it as a rectangular (covered) pool, but the circular shape in the NE corner is throwing me off. Might be a hot tub with intersecting geometry? Might be an open pool umbrella? Who knows.

The Esri World Imagery has a clearer, rectangular pool that matches what I thought I saw in the Bing image. Since this pool appears to be installed into the ground, I feel fairly confident it's a newer installation.

Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta and Mapbox Satellite both show the oval, above-ground pool that you describe. In my experience these are usually both older than the other satellite image sources, but there are always exceptions.
jacobwhall (2023-07-30 05:37:22+00:00): The good people of Staten Island will likely never know how much I thought about the shapes of their pools 😂
tastrax (2023-07-29 05:14:59+00:00): Hi Jamang1999 - you appear to be using some custom imagery that we dont have permission to use. Can you confirm if a waiver has been signed for use of this imagery? If not, we will need to revert all the changes in your most recent changesets.
jamang1999 (2023-07-29 06:49:06+00:00): Thanks Tastrax, I've reverted these changesets.
silversurfer83 (2023-07-28 12:41:58+00:00): double entry. removed
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139080670
whb (2023-07-27 16:56:29+00:00): Das waren keine Dubletten, sondern die Halteposition der Busse auf der Straße:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6640044785/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5587833633/history
danieldegroot2 (2023-07-28 11:54:15+00:00): Hey Outlawcatcher,

A regular bus stop node should be placed where the signpost is located and otherwise where a passenger boards the bus. Routing applications do require traffic restrictions to be at least placed on the street itself, but for other POIs they will usually derive the closest position on the nearest path or street.
There is a bus 'stop position' node, which can be placed on the street at the location the bus stops at (mainly if a stop line is marked), though it is not required, especially if the stop location and the sign are at roughly the same point along the road.
( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:public_transport%3Dstop_position )

Also, please don't connect landuse or similar areas (ie forest, parking) to ways (ie track, path). This makes it easier to maintain.
(applications looking for eg. 'forest nearby road' also do not require this connection to get information.)

I have moved the bus stop node to a more likely position. Do you know if this bus stop still exists, perhaps?
If it does, feel free to add the name where signposted, it will help with routing.

Here are your changes:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=139080926

Made changes in
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139131001
( is: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=139131001 )

Regards,

Daniel
ratrun (2023-09-13 05:59:11+00:00): Hello xbarnada_nexus!

This changeset disconnected most of the ferry routes in the port of Barcelona from the road network. As a result the ferry routing from/to Barcelona is currently broken. 
Please check https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11071043689#map=19/41.36956/2.17710, this node is not connected.
If  I roll back your changeset I can see that the previous road connectivity looked more accurate. It used these still existing ferry_terminal nodes: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/468523299 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/30717964

As it looks as you have on-site knowledge I would ask you to answer the following questions: 

1) Why did you introduce the new node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11071043689 ?
2) Where is it possible to enter/leave the ferries on a vehicle? The two still existing ferry_terminal nodes also do not seem to be 100% correct as they are only connected to service roads, which are only indirectly connected to the main roads.
xbarnada_nexus (2023-09-13 06:37:32+00:00): 1) This is the new starting point of this routes
2) I don't know exactly where they enter/leave. I will check it
ratrun (2023-09-29 15:17:56+00:00): I now added a service road in order to fix the currently broken ferry routing. Please verify if this is edit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141918016 is correct and remove the "fixme" tag if you know better. It if this is correct for cars it is unclear to me what is the correct entry point for pedestrians and bicycles.
xbarnada_nexus (2023-10-02 06:15:53+00:00): Thank you @ratrun, I'm not expert on ferry routes so I missed this part.
Your changeset seems correct to me
adrianojbr (2023-07-27 12:55:36+00:00): Olá, filipekarkle!

Aviso que as imagens da Esri estão mais atualizadas em Blumenau. Inclusive, a casa que você adicionou já aparece nelas.

Essas imagens podem ser acessadas no painel lateral direito.

Aproveito para esclarecer que se deve evitar o alinhamento de elementos exclusivamente com base em imagens de satélite. Há distorções devido as fotos serem em 2D representando um mundo 3D.

Mais informações em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Align_aerial_imagery_before_tracing.

Ainda, é possível adicionar os traços Strava com mais qualidade para avaliar qual imagem mais bem posicionada ou corrigir o posicionamento da imagem, conforme https://erickdeoliveiraleal.medium.com/tutorial-strava-openstreetmap-josm-or-id-2e2003f4aea3

Cabe lembrar que é o registro principalmente de ciclistas e pedestres, então tem que ter atenção ao mapear as vias por essa camada. Mas, sem dúvidas, são ótimos para conferir o alinhamento das imagens de satélite.

Abraço!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139081141
Vinber-Pro (2023-07-28 09:02:04+00:00): shop=yes n'est pas suffisant. Qu'est ce que l'on trouve dans ce magasin ?
name=Magasin Narindra marchandises Generales me semble être en partie une discussion. Le nom c'est Narindra ?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139081186
Vinber-Pro (2023-07-28 09:02:20+00:00): le nom c'est André ?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139081491
NorthCrab_upload (2023-07-27 11:30:23+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/370008700

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/370016886

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Piotr Strębski (2023-07-27 11:49:44+00:00): poprawione poprzez ponowny import z PRG
whb (2023-07-27 13:09:54+00:00): Guten Tag,

mir erscheint das Gebäude unrealistisch groß, zumal es 4 andere Gebäude und die Straße überlagert:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1192634962
Vor Ort ist dort jedenfalls kein so großes Gebäude erkennbar.
Ist die Änderung dieses Gebäudes inkl. Hausnummer und POI wirklich richtig?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/387501658
Zumal der POI schon hier eingetragen und somit jetzt doppelt vorhanden ist:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/312085932

Viele Grüße
whb
Bouncing0333 (2023-07-27 16:18:28+00:00): Guten Tag whb,
heute ist mein erster Editierungs-Tag bei OSM. Ich erkenne Ihre Einwände zum Teil an. Die Größe des Gebäudes habe ich irrtümlich eingetragen (wollte das Gelände markieren) - dies habe ich rückgängig gemacht.

Die Änderung des kleinen, nebenstehenden Gebäudes kann so bestehen bleiben, da das Gebäude definitiv eine Lokalität der Agentur für Arbeit ist.

Der POI ist doppelt eingetragen, das stimmt. Hier versuche ich mich noch mit einem erfolgreichen Löschen meiner Dublette.

Viele Grüße!
aseidel (2023-08-02 08:55:37+00:00): Liebe:r Jannik L,
bitte beim way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/41195526 noch lit=* ergänzen!
Danke und herzliche Grüße
Antje Seidel
#lgmaps
Jannik L (2023-08-03 15:07:56+00:00): Liebe Antje Seidel,
ist ergänzt. Am Ende werden wir unser Eintragungen nochmal auf Vollständigkeit überprüfen, vielen Dank aber für den Hinweis.
Grüße
Jannik L
#lgmaps
Vinber-Pro (2023-07-28 09:00:32+00:00): shop=yes n'est pas suffisant pour décrire un magasin. Que signifie première nécessité ici stp ?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139081772
whb (2023-07-27 16:59:48+00:00): Briefkästen bitte nicht mit dem Umriss eines Wohngebiets verbinden:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11071082843
Baloo Uriza (2023-07-27 11:45:50+00:00): Please stop changing destination:street to destination.  There's no reason to do this.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139082121
eggie (2023-07-27 19:05:53+00:00): Dag r nieuwpoort..
Je vraagt feedback.
Het was hier al gedeeltelijk als fietspad getagd... Dus het routeerde al niet voor motorvoertuigen.  
Ik heb nog even  het paaltje toegevoegd.
Het is geen weg voor bestemmingsverkeer hier.
Wat is / was het probleem?
MVG
eggie
rnieuwpoort (2023-07-28 04:27:10+00:00): Goedemorgen eggie, 

Doordat het beginstukje van De welving nog een openbare weg is sturen zij ons met een vrachtwagen richting de Wildschutweg. in het midden staan paaltjes.. dus ik hoop doordat jij nu nog een paaltje heb toegevoegd dat het probleem verholpen is.. Thanks voor de feedback BTW.
eggie (2023-07-28 05:05:00+00:00): Het zou moeten werken.. maar al zit er maar een meter fietspad tussen dan nog zou een motorvoertuig niet routeren hier..
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_car&route=52.50574%2C4.91648%3B52.50613%2C4.91614#map=15/52.5061/4.9224&layers=N
Is het geen oude kaart waar het fietspad nog niet op staat?
eggie (2023-07-28 07:09:08+00:00): Nog even gekeken...

Het fietspad staat pas sinds dit voorjaar ingetekend. Daarvoor was het gewoon een highway=residential
zie changeset.. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133599508

Waarschijnlijk werken/werkten  jullie met oude OSM data.


Het kan ook zijn dat de 'routing engine' los staat van de kaart.
De kaart laat een fietspad en een paaltje zien en in de 'engine' zit nog de residential.

Dus even e.e.a. checken.
In OSM staat het dus sinds maart 2023 goed. 
Groet
eggie
Vinber-Pro (2023-07-28 08:59:27+00:00): Quel est le lien entre le commentaire "chez Moustafa" et l'ajout d'un distributeur automatique comme celui ci https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:vending=elongated_coin