piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
porfiriopaiz (2025-10-17 23:31:22+00:00): Esta es una mejora del mensaje, haciendo la comunicación más profesional, amable, y enfocada en la acción, mientras se clarifican las razones detrás de la observación sobre la etiqueta `name`.

---

¡Hola!

Agradezco mucho tu contribución al mapa de OpenStreetMap. Es gracias a la dedicación de mapeadores como tú que la calidad de nuestros datos sigue creciendo.

Me gustaría compartir contigo una observación clave sobre un reciente conjunto de ediciones, la cual te ayudará a alinear aún más tus contribuciones con los estándares de la comunidad:

### Observación sobre el etiquetado de árboles (`natural=tree`)

Hemos notado que has estado utilizando la etiqueta **`name=*`** para registrar el nombre de la especie o el nombre común de los árboles.

Según las directrices de la comunidad de OpenStreetMap, la etiqueta `name` está reservada para **nombres propios** (ej. "Árbol de Guernica", "Sauce Llorón de la Plaza Mayor").

Para especificar la especie o el nombre común de un árbol, la documentación oficial indica que se deben usar las siguientes etiquetas:

* Para el **nombre científico de la especie**: utiliza `species=*` (ej. `species=Quercus robur`).
* Para el **nombre común de la especie**: utiliza `species:common=*` (ej. `species:common=Roble`).

**Referencia Oficial:**
Puedes encontrar la documentación completa y los lineamientos de etiquetado en el siguiente enlace de la Wiki de OSM:

> **[ES:Tag:natural=tree - Etiquetas adicionales](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:natural%3Dtree#Etiquetas_adicionales)**

Para garantizar la calidad y consistencia de los datos en OpenStreetMap, **procederé a remover la etiqueta `name=*`** de los elementos afectados y, si es posible, la reemplazaré con la etiqueta de especie correspondiente, si la información está disponible.

Muchas gracias por tu comprensión y por tu interés en seguir mejorando la precisión de nuestros datos.

¡Feliz mapeo!

Saludos cordiales,
Porfirio Paiz.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-16 00:55:19+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Sobieskiego":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13235540350

"Karola Chodkiewicza":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/972100060
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1080330695

"Lema":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1040226916

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
syntex (2025-10-16 17:03:35+00:00): Poprawiłem
sykul (2025-10-16 06:53:15+00:00): Thanks for adding the shop type. I see you also deleted the name though. In that case, what is the real name?
FrenchCookie (2025-10-16 08:53:00+00:00): Hi, sorry the name didn't change and I don't know how I've deleted its name, I've put it back !
pitfire (2025-10-16 03:42:26+00:00): Hi enifog,
Dein Wechsel auf "ground" ist ein Rückbau auf "keine spezifische Oberfläche" und somit keinesfalls grade1
Wasserfester Belag (Asphalt, Beton oder Pflastersteine) 

Siehe auch:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:tracktype?uselang=de

Warum also auf dieser Teilstrecke eine gravierende Änderung?
VG pitfire
enifog (2025-10-16 09:01:19+00:00): Hallo pitfire, danke für die Prüfung und Rückmeldung. Ich habe nun die Eintragung mit JOSM berichtigt. Hatte für die Ergänzung erstmalig die App StreetComplete genutzt und wohl die falsche Auswahl getroffen.  
Gruß enifog
Mohamed_Taha (2025-10-16 11:31:50+00:00): Hello Joachim_0,
Thank you for contributing to improving the road network on OpenStreetMap.
I noticed that you added the tag layer=* to some roads. These roads are at the same level as nearby buildings. To fix cases where a highway appears to cross a building, it’s better to adjust the positions of the buildings and the road to the correct locations rather than using layer=*.
The layer=* tag is only used when a road is actually at a higher or lower layer, such as in a tunnel or bridge. You can find more details here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer.
Therefore, the layer=* tag should be removed from these roads, and these roads and buildings should be reshaped to the correct positions:
way 38893584, way 42440693, way 727964631, way 183845315, way 475388690, way 731259951, way 487512658
Best regards,
Mohamed_Taha
Joachim_0 (2025-10-16 16:22:51+00:00): Thanks for feedback. Let me see how to fix them over the next few days.

Regards and thanks 

Joachim
Mohamed_Taha (2025-10-19 11:35:26+00:00): Thank you.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-16 00:55:28+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1442480141
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1442480142

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
syntex (2025-10-16 17:03:58+00:00): Poprawiłem
Zrop (2025-10-16 10:18:18+00:00): Hallo LinoHammer,
die Adressen sind hier schon korrekt am Gebäudeumriss eingetragen, daher kommt die Adresse nicht nochmal an die Eingänge. Und Eingänge zu Mehrfamilienhäuser werden als "entrance=staircase" eingetragen.

Gruß
Zrop
dktue (2025-12-29 10:55:07+00:00): I love the level of detail you put into Madeira Airport!

But are you sure about the color of the taxiway edge lights?
Example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13105821437

If you're unsure, simply remove the light:colour-tag and they will be shown in the default blue that they most like are in reality.
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2025-12-29 18:21:27+00:00): hi, been editing the lights colours based on stream. example from runway 05 https://www.youtube.com/live/DoeFiwCEwAU?si=aRGdH2DWrdkqflJL&t=4190 and from runway 23 https://www.youtube.com/live/THXjcV-bPlo?si=9JFyligRy_fPMUap&t=33
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2025-12-29 18:22:07+00:00): the one you indicated, should be blue, will edit them when i have time
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2025-12-29 18:30:53+00:00): done, can you confirm it's correct now. also added a few red ones that wasn't mapped and can be seen on the video on the threshold of the hold runway 24
SafwatHalaby (2025-10-17 12:32:40+00:00): שלום. בדוק יש פה חניון? בתצלומי אוויר זה נראה כמו אזור חקלאי
b-jazz (2025-10-16 04:34:34+00:00): Hey Chris. What you've done here with "removing inner/outer definitions" is incorrect. A fairway that surrounds a green is defined with a multipolygon with the fairway as the outer and a green as the inner. Please stop making changes to relations unless you fully understand how they are used. Thanks.
Chris Denomy (2025-10-17 20:00:42+00:00): Hi b-jazz.  FYI I'm using the exported course maps in a utility that turns them into files for a video game.  Anything tagged as inner/outer it fails to recognize and convert.  I realize that this is not your concern.  In my defense, however, I've been flagged before and at one point had a moderator tell another moderator that this convention wasn't mandatory.  Personally I've splined 100+ courses from scratch and never using this definition and not received complaints.  Anyway, henceforth I'll desist from making this type of change.  Perhaps I'll write the author of the program and see if they can code around this.  Regards, Chris
b-jazz (2025-10-17 20:17:03+00:00): Thanks for getting back to me Chris. Much appreciated. You are correct in saying that putting fairway/green pairs into a multipolygon relation "isn't mandatory". However, taking an existing pair that is in a relation and breaking that relation is frowned upon. 

As for getting the author to make a change, that would be fantastic. If you are talking about "Chad's Tool", there already exists a fix that just hasn't been incorporated yet. It's been out there for at least 6 months. Any pressure you can put on the author would be appreciated. If you are technical, I'm guessing you could incorporate that fix in your own fork of the tool and have a private working version. If that is the tool you're talking about and you need more info, let me know.
Zrop (2025-10-16 10:52:27+00:00): Hallo LinoHammer,
was sollen hier die "payment:*" Tags an der Rheinische Hochschule Köln bedeuten ?

Gruß
Zrop
Zrop (2025-10-16 10:04:01+00:00): Hallo LinoHammer,
der Tag "website" ist für den offiziellen Internetauftritts eines Objekts, nicht für die Quelle. Bitte wieder entfernen, Danke.

Gruß
Zrop
pantufla (2025-11-20 14:22:36+00:00): Hello, please see: https://mapgen-fi-1.comaps.app/subway/validator/spain.html

This caused an error
Glassman (2025-10-16 21:44:51+00:00): #TIP: Opening Hours, each day needs to be separated by a ;
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173343437
NeisReview (2025-10-26 08:08:54+00:00): Is this really "an area used for any military purpose, with additional tags to describe that purpose"? I thought it was a residential area now.
SweetGIS (2025-10-26 16:58:04+00:00): Hallo, ich bearbeite diese Orte anhand von Kommentaren anderer Nutzer und meinem lokalen Wissen. Mir war nicht bekannt, dass die Informationen für diese Karten auf der Geodateninfrastruktur Hessen basieren. Sollten meine Angaben nicht korrekt sein, bitte ich Sie, die entsprechenden Korrekturen vorzunehmen.
pitscheplatsch (2025-10-27 06:44:47+00:00): Hallo, danke für Ihre Antwort. Was ist denn die Quelle von den "Kommentaren anderer Nutzer"? Hier in diesem Changeset steht ja nur "source=local knowledge".
TheSwavu (2025-10-16 03:14:31+00:00): Comment should have been unglued w459261131 from roads.
b-jazz (2025-10-21 16:21:02+00:00): Hi Jaker, I just wanted to let you know I made a couple of small changes to your golf course mapping. The start of the golf=hole line you drew in a couple of places was labelled as a golf=tee. But the area around that was already marked as a tee, which is redundant. So I removed the tag on the node itself. Just thought you'd want to know.
nevw (2025-10-16 04:42:02+00:00): Hi, you seem to have deleted Ormond Station and dragged a tree from up the road onto the Taekwondo place.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=173344775
Mohini_123 (2025-10-16 04:53:59+00:00): ok can you please revert the chnages and I'll try to delete just the station again . Thanks!
nevw (2025-10-16 05:14:26+00:00): Ok, I have reverted the changeset now.
Mohini_123 (2025-10-22 01:39:20+00:00): Hi , sorry to be a pain but can you please revert my changes? Thanks!
Mohini_123 (2025-10-23 01:06:35+00:00): Hi, Can you please put the Ormond station back ? I deleted the wrong one by mistake. Thanks!
nevw (2025-10-23 03:49:44+00:00): Sorry about delay.
I have reverted all 3 changesets now in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173653890#map=16/-37.90717/145.03905
So all is likely to be as it was originally.
Filip009 (2026-02-24 20:18:39+00:00): Neotagovaná cesta https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1442514329
Filip009 (2026-05-15 10:00:09+00:00): Neotagovaná cesta https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1442514329
user_5359 (2025-10-16 06:10:38+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved two nodes  more than 100 meters over streets and buildings. 
I must reverted you whole change set.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-10 15:10:15+00:00): Removed SEO spam tags sourced from Google Maps in changeset 183929227

https://osm.org/changeset/183929227
rempshaener (2025-10-16 15:59:29+00:00): Hallo,

du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.

Die Erfassung von unterirdischen Leitungen ist ein schwieriges Thema, das auch schon öfters diskutiert wurde, zuletzt z. B. hier in einem vergleichbaren Fall: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/erfassung-unterirdischer-leitungen-hier-wasserleitungen-fur-einen-hydrantenplan/133749.
Die Tendenz geht schon deutlich in die Richtung, dass die Erfassung unterirdischer Leitungen eher unterbleiben sollte.

Bei Fragen bitte melden.
Viele Grüße
cosphi (2025-10-16 17:15:46+00:00): Vielen Dank für deine Antwort.
Ich wohne da und sehe jeden Tag wie die Fernwärmeleitung verlegt wird.
Ich dachte dass dies eine gute Gelegenheut sei die LEitung zu mappen bevor das Wissen verloren geht. Ich war mir natürlich nicht sicher ob ich das richtig mache - daher die Bitte um das review. Wenn es unüblich ist kann ich die Leitung gerne wieder löschen. 


Danke dir
rempshaener (2025-10-16 20:26:52+00:00): Hallo,
meine Meinung geht in Richtung Löschung.
Problematisch sind vor allem zwei Punkte:
- Mangelnde Überprüfbarkeit durch andere Mapper. Damit ist ein zentrales Element bei OSM gefährdet.
- Pflegbarkeit: Auf Grund der Dichte unterirdischer Leitungswege ist mittelfristig die Wartung deutlich erschwert.
Viele Grüße
cosphi (2025-10-17 04:03:05+00:00): Habe die Fernwärmeleitung eben gelöscht. War ja nicht so wahnsinnig aufwändig :-)
Danke fürs reviewen...
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-24 13:56:25+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with blatant advertising hype and malformed tags/values that was added back after being cleaned up, in changeset 184525430

https://osm.org/changeset/184525430
FroschForscher (2025-10-18 08:52:26+00:00): Hallo cosphi,

hier hat es aber viele Kindergärten ;)

amenity=kindergarten dient zum einzeichnen eines Kindergartens, nicht für die einzelnen Gruppen oder gar einer "Sporthalle".

FroschForscher
cosphi (2025-10-18 18:38:27+00:00): Habe die Gruppen wieder entfernt
Глеб (2025-11-13 07:13:55+00:00): Не используйте бинг здесь он на 12 лет устарел уже
Bienson (2025-10-17 05:59:55+00:00): Hallo,

Hier hast du der Trauerhalle https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/112449085, die nur als Gebäudeteil des gesamten Gebäudes eingetragen war (building:part=yes) ein building=commercial verpasst, sodass zwei Gebäude übereinander lagen.

Gebäude-Tag korrigiert in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173393043

Außerdem noch ein paar Anmerkungen zu den restlichen Edits:

building=commercial passt nicht wirklich zu den Friedhofsgebäuden. Es sind ja keine Gewerbegebäude.
Ich würde building=civic vorschlagen (Öffentliches Gebäude):

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:building%3Dcivic

Oder auch einfach das neutrale building=yes.

Eingänge schweben nicht in der Luft, sondern sollten am Gebäude anliegen. (siehe Bild bei https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:entrance#Zugangsberechtigung)

Bitte dabei aber nicht die Gebäudeumrisse verschieben.

Außerdem bitte keine Abkürzungen in den Namen verwenden ("Hauptfr."), siehe:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen#Abk%C3%BCrzungen_(nicht_verwenden!)
FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (2025-10-17 06:04:22+00:00): alles klar. verstehe ich. VG
EclipseVasco (2025-10-18 10:02:44+00:00): Doesn't this break navigation from Piata Avram Iancu to Strada Constanta? I think this little segment should be left bidrectional because in pratice it operates as such.
Masherbrum (2025-10-22 17:15:55+00:00): Hi EclipseVasco: 
Thanks for reaching out. I added the oneway based on the presence of painted arrows and a sign visible in Mapillary (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=500868127924769&lat=46.772717&lng=23.596167&z=17&focus=photo), but upon further review I see there is a designated lane for public transport traveling in the opposite direction (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1144909622674997&lat=46.77308&lng=23.5970345&z=17&focus=photo). I have removed the oneway here.
Have a great day!
Bienson (2025-10-17 00:02:10+00:00): access=no ist falsch. access=private ist auf dem Schulgelände korrekt. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure%3Dschoolyard

Bitte ändern (inklusive den vergessenen Wegen, z.B. openstreetmap.org/way/1348326014 oder https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1348325994
SafwatHalaby (2025-10-16 10:59:03+00:00): היי קובי, אשמח אם תוסיפו את המסלולים כ-path ולא כ-cycleway

cycleway זה מסלול אופניים יעודי ולרוב סלול לדוגמה נתיבי אופניים עירוניים בגוש דן
trigpoint (2025-11-22 20:42:51+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/175004482
trigpoint (2025-11-22 20:42:46+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/175004482
skadi (2025-11-09 20:13:34+00:00): кажется, ты сломал мультиполигон всей сосновки. К которому и относилась росинка
skadi (2025-11-09 20:17:33+00:00): вернул все обратно
mkoverda (2025-11-10 07:33:17+00:00): прошу прощения, спасибо
trigpoint (2025-11-22 20:42:42+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/175004482
trigpoint (2025-11-22 20:42:36+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/175004482
trigpoint (2025-11-22 20:42:31+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/175004482
NeisBot (2025-10-16 05:54:40+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description
user_5359 (2025-10-16 06:01:18+00:00): SPAM removed by https://www.osm.org/changeset/173348063
TrickyFoxy (2026-01-17 11:49:58+00:00): https://osm.org/node/1306616954 

type=restriction используется для отношений. Может быть вы имели в виду barrier=*?
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-10-17 10:34:32+00:00): Hi!
This data was correct and was aligned using geodesic data. I will fix the alignment. Thanks and have a nice day!
Ra_colate (2025-10-18 07:00:49+00:00): Hi ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you.
Ra_colate (2025-10-23 03:53:43+00:00): Hi ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy, thank you for making the corrections. Based on previous community discussions, we refrain from adjusting similar situations to this, so this was an oversight. I will be more mindful in my future edits. Thank you for your understanding, you have a nice day too.
Rawmance (2026-04-17 16:43:19+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=id#map=18/60.385024/24.743549

Tossa ei ole mitään ulkoilyväylää vaan menee aidatun leikkipuiston läpi parkkipaikalle. Tää on täysin sattumanvarainen muutos joka ei millään tavalla vastaa mitä siellä todellisuudessa on.
CKVL Source 21 (2025-10-16 21:34:02+00:00): Hi this node: 5951679163 is incorrect and should be removed. There is another node 203396727 which is the correct location on this road. Please adjust by removing 5951679163 node. Thanks
user_5359 (2025-10-17 06:56:58+00:00): see https://www.osm.org/changeset/173395046
NeisBot (2025-10-16 06:45:40+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
Bill Bone (2025-10-16 06:49:52+00:00): I have updated it. Please see if it's okay with you now. Thank you.
pitscheplatsch (2025-10-16 07:17:56+00:00): Hello Bill, and thank you for updating your office element.

I appreciate your effort to revise the description. However, the text still reads more like a professional or promotional bio than map-relevant information. OpenStreetMap focuses on factual, geographic data, for example, what is located where, rather than personal qualifications or case descriptions.

For this object, a concise and neutral description such as: "Law office of Bill Bone" would be sufficient and fully appropriate.

Also, please note that there already appears to be another OSM entry for the same business at the same address. You may want to check whether these represent the same entity and, if so, consider merging or keeping only one to avoid duplicates.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13086506549

Best regards, Pascal
NeisReview (2025-10-18 11:01:52+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/173368225
Dimacn (2026-02-09 02:50:32+00:00): Здравствуйте. Не нашёл офис агенства в этом здании. Можете как-то подтвердить, что он есть в реальности?
BarnaulRomanTV (2026-02-09 11:53:26+00:00): Да, могу прислать реальные фотографии с телефона, когда нужно придти? Могу сейчас в течении часа, могу завтра, куда отправить фотографии? Фотография с сигной вашего ника - Dimacn подойдёт? Я напишу ваш ник на квадратной бумажке и сфотографирую в руке.
Dimacn (2026-02-10 05:28:26+00:00): Спасибо за ответ. Достаточно будет вывеску с названием, и с окружающей обстановкой, чтобы сориентироваться на местности. Бумажки не надо.
BarnaulRomanTV (2026-02-10 05:30:54+00:00): Куда прислать фото?
Dimacn (2026-02-10 05:42:37+00:00): Хоть куда. Да хоть на imageban.ru
Dimacn (2026-02-26 03:23:28+00:00): К сожалению, вы так и не ответили. Стоит ещё подождать или можно удалить точку?
BarnaulRomanTV (2026-02-27 06:10:11+00:00): Спасибо что напомнили сейчас загружу в течение часа
BarnaulRomanTV (2026-02-27 06:16:46+00:00): https://imageban.ru/show/2026/02/27/3a7e903c68b1cf2c127213e2e2ab1530/jpeg
https://imageban.ru/show/2026/02/27/8a83cdc5b9ebfcadb90b86e4d9ab93c3/jpeg
https://imageban.ru/show/2026/02/27/57a1d8b5e607ebb0237cb8d27cfad3e4/jpeg
https://imageban.ru/show/2026/02/27/b48a5b85cbfd56d3591ca0fda2aad092/jpeg
Фото входа в офис, вход со двора, выкладывал когда-то в навигатор 2ГИС.
BarnaulRomanTV (2026-02-27 06:18:44+00:00): Подскажите как перенести точку? Точка сейчас на лицевой стороне здания, а нужно её параллельно переместить только со стороны двора.
Dimacn (2026-03-01 05:22:26+00:00): Вы прикалываетесь? На ваших фото нет ни намёка на офис агенства. Нет ни вывески, ни графика, ни офиса, ничего. На карту OSM мы не вносим виртуальные объекты и офисы, только то что существует реально и имеет свойство проверяемости. Я удалил вашу точку.
rempshaener (2025-10-16 15:40:03+00:00): Hallo,

du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.

Die Anpassung ist eine gute Idee. Konsequenterweise könnest du auch noch die Adresse entfernen, diese ist ebenfalls redundant hinterlegt.

Bei Fragen bitte melden.
Viele Grüße
stadtnavi Herrenberg (2025-10-21 06:32:50+00:00): Hallo, 
vielen Dank für das Feedback! Ich habe die Adresse am Schulgebäude nun ebenfalls entfernt.
Viele Grüße
HellMap (2025-10-16 09:45:39+00:00): Hi,

Just to confirm the `motor_vehicle=yes` - the gate is really public and anyone in a car can go through here? Like it's automatic or uses a button or something?
MblWaK (2025-10-16 11:46:21+00:00): Hi!

It’s hard to say for sure right now.
A few months ago, this road was open to everyone, but currently the gate is closed. I didn’t see any button, intercom, or other way to open it.

Once it’s clear whether the access is public or private, I’ll update the lift_gate status.

Also, a bit further down the street, behind the gate and opposite Rimi, some construction has started. I haven’t been yet close enough to see what’s being built, but I’ll update the map once I find out.
HellMap (2025-10-16 11:57:48+00:00): I also passed here a couple time in the last months. I just haven't had the time to update the map yet. I didn't really check the gate beyond noting it's new. But it did seem closed/private, which is why I asked. Because it would make this whole road private.  But I also don't know more details. I didn't map the construction south either.
MblWaK (2025-10-16 12:13:17+00:00): I'm not sure this is actually a private road: there's no gate at the far end, only concrete blocks at the entrance. 

Here's the blocks location: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/56.988577/24.159563

But let's wait and see what happens with this road
HellMap (2025-10-16 12:21:48+00:00): Yes, and those blocks make this road only accessible from this side, so the barrier on this side determines the access. If the gate is private, then the road is private, because it's a deadend road essentially. But I guess we can wait and see.
DorkyP (2025-10-16 08:14:17+00:00): Whoop, that was a mistake. Any ideas how to undo? 😅
nevw (2025-10-16 09:35:18+00:00): I reverted this changeset.
nevw (2025-10-16 09:40:28+00:00): You can see imagery of the new building on some Esri zooms