piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Rev1415 (2025-06-02 23:58:59+00:00): Všiml jsem si, že souřadnice těchto míst zřejmě zcela odpovídají  souřadnicím uvedeným na webu trampskekempy.com. Ověřeno na lokalitách jako Vrahův kemp, kde sedí do posledního desetinnéh místa. Ponecháme-li stranou otázku spolehlivosti tohoto webu, který je zřetelně zaměřen na likvidaci takových míst a není z hlediska spolehlivosti příliš dobře hodnocen na Google Play, prosím autora o vyjádření, zda jsou data v souladu s licencí OdbL a Import Gudelines. Dále o vyjádření, zda je 
(A) Autorem výše zmíněného webu (web nyní uvádí jako autora jinou osobu) (B) Má souhlas k použití dat. Stránky byly v době importu dat provozovány pseudoanonymně.
(C) Seznámil komunitu s plánem na import v souladu s Import Guidelines (Community Buy-In). 
Jinak doporučuji ke smazání na základě pravděpodobného porušení licence.

ENG: I noticed that the coordinates of these places seem to completely correspond to the coordinates listed on the website trampskekempy.com. Verified on locations such as Vrahův kemp, where they are accurate to the last decimal place. Leaving aside the question of the reliability of this website, which is clearly focused on the liquidation of such places and is not very well rated in terms of reliability on Google Play, I ask the author to state whether the data is in accordance with the OdbL license and Import Gudelines. Furthermore, to state whether he is
(A) The author of the above-mentioned website (the website lists another person as the author) (B) Has consent to the use of the data. The original site was operated pseudo-anonymously at the time of data import.
(C) He has informed the community of the plan for import in accordance with the Import Guidelines (Community Buy-In).
Otherwise, I recommend deletion based on probable license violation.
Tomas_J (2025-06-03 09:38:24+00:00): Zdravím, všechny lokality jsem osobně navštívil na základě údajů z Vámi zmíněného webu a data vkládal až pak. Zdroj dat je tedy Survey - průzkum a neporušuje žádnou licenci. Nejsem autorem tohoto webu ani nejsem s ním nijak spojeny, jsem jenom řadový maper a turista. Se smazáním nesouhlasím.
user_22095758 (2025-06-03 10:47:06+00:00): Souhlasím se smazáním.Jenom dement nebo Březina může oznacit na mapach trampské místo, které znamená mhohem více než jen tečku na mapě.Souhlasim se smazáním,a to všech podobnych mist, která oznacili stejní pitomci.Prozkoumavejte si jinde a tyto pietni a  vzpomínková mista nechte stranou.Zdar
Tomas_J (2025-06-03 11:09:29+00:00): Prosil bych bez urážek (dement, pitomec). V Openstreetmap se mapuje podle skutečného stavu v terénu (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ground_truth), uvedená místa jsou navíc tisíc krát zveřejněna už i někde jinde (jinak bych se na ně nedostal). Pokud je v datech nějaká chyba (poloha, přístupnost), můžete ji opravit ale né mazat to co existuje.
JassKurn (2024-10-28 14:44:34+00:00): Reverted in changeset 158459474
This is one of group of changesets from new account, made over two days, that introduce errors. coastlinebot has failed to respond to requests to explain edits.
Yurii Skvortsov (2024-10-22 12:37:43+00:00): maxspeed route ˇ
jmarchon (2024-10-22 21:41:36+00:00): Welcome to OSM and thanks for getting your business added properly!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158210031
Rodrigo Rega (2024-10-22 16:18:32+00:00): Hola.

El comentario de este conjunto de cambios no es lo suficientemente descriptivo para que el resto de usuarios se hagan una idea de cuáles han sido los elementos que se han editado. Por favor, consulta la siguiente página para saber como hacer comentarios que faciliten el trabajo de revisión de ediciones: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenos_comentarios_en_conjuntos_de_cambios

Gracias por tus aportes a OpenStreetMap.

Un saludo.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158210452
phoenixsaigon1698 (2024-10-23 04:28:15+00:00): Bạn vui lòng mô tả kỹ hơn ở từng changeset nhé
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Frans S (2024-10-23 10:47:27+00:00): Please read our messages and map accordingly !!
GerdP (2024-10-23 08:07:34+00:00): Korrektur Copy+Paste Fehler: Radtour am 20.10.2024
InsertUser (2024-10-22 15:42:45+00:00): Please don't just delete things you don't understand. 

This was an error that was easy to fix. Even without a fix in place it contained useful information.
lucka-me (2024-10-22 16:24:33+00:00): Thank you for pointing it out and the fix. Actually I'm confused about the whole City of Freeport, the boundary seems very different with the image on Wikipedia, and much larger than the "230-square mile" described on government's website, how can we figure out which is the correct one?
InsertUser (2024-10-22 18:11:28+00:00): I don't know how that is calculated but it probably just includes the land. I don't know how much of the mangrove on the north shore has been included in the "land area" either.

If you mean the wikipedia page for Freeport itself then I don't know where the little image comes from. As it appears to exclude the main harbour, the airport, Bahamia and other areas that are administered as part of Freeport I wouldn't put too much weight on it. 

The OSM boundaries looked similar to the ones on Wikipedia until I attempted to improve them. The boundaries I did were very rough from local knowledge. The original settlements that pre-date Freeport were excluded from the newly formed Port Area and so were excluded from the "City of Freeport" relation. 

I don't know of an official source for the current boundaries that is suitably licensed for OSM. When I attempted to read the legislation defining the boundaries of the local government districts it appeared that they were assembled from electoral polling divisions and the polling divisions were only available in maps with a copyright notice that appeared to me (as someone without legal training) to go against the OSMF guidance on what is acceptable for use as a source in OSM.

I would like to do a revision at some point to lower the `admin_level` of these to a level close to what you see for local government in e.g. England and make a distinction between the single level and dual level districts and town areas but without a suitable source I'm not sure how much value there is in this.
LKAsahi (2024-10-22 13:20:15+00:00): 資料來源：https://www.v523.tw/upload/fileUrl/2016-09/29/5c2dd9c9-c597-41e3-9a77-f154c89ac9cc.pdf
《變更新店都市計畫（第三次通盤檢討）書》p. 2-23
felipeeugenio (2024-10-22 13:20:24+00:00): Id	Contributor	Tmstmp UTC	Action	Comment
4488532	felipeeugenio	2024-10-22 15:08	closed	ok
4488513	felipeeugenio	2024-10-22 15:08	closed	ok
4488527	felipeeugenio	2024-10-22 15:08	closed	ok
4488818	felipeeugenio	2024-10-22 15:08	closed	ok
4486070	felipeeugenio	2024-10-22 15:08	closed	ok
4488517	felipeeugenio	2024-10-22 15:08	closed	ok
4488512	felipeeugenio	2024-10-22 15:08	closed	ok
4488526	felipeeugenio	2024-10-22 15:08	closed	ok
4488817	felipeeugenio	2024-10-22 15:08	closed	ok
4488507	felipeeugenio	2024-10-22 15:08	closed	ok
4488521	felipeeugenio	2024-10-22 15:08	closed	ok
4488831	felipeeugenio	2024-10-22 15:08	closed	ok
4488516	felipeeugenio	2024-10-22 15:08	closed	ok
4488530	felipeeugenio	2024-10-22 15:08	closed	ok
4488511	felipeeugenio	2024-10-22 15:07	closed	ok
4486059	felipeeugenio	2024-10-22 15:07	closed	ok
4488525	felipeeugenio	2024-10-22 15:07	closed	ok
4486073	felipeeugenio	2024-10-22 15:07	closed	ok
4488506	felipeeugenio	2024-10-22 15:07	closed	ok
4488520	felipeeugenio	2024-10-22 15:07	closed	ok
4486077	felipeeugenio	2024-10-22 15:07	closed	ok
4488510	felipeeugenio	2024-10-22 15:07	closed	ok
4488519	felipeeugenio	2024-10-22 15:07	closed	ok
4488514	felipeeugenio	2024-10-22 15:07	closed	ok
4488523	felipeeugenio	2024-10-22 15:07	closed	ok
4488833	felipeeugenio	2024-10-22 15:07	closed	ok
maraf24 (2024-11-01 20:37:08+00:00): Znaki zakaz ruchu wciąż stoją.
Tomek | Yanosik (2024-11-04 08:27:50+00:00): Dzięki za informację
rarad74 (2024-11-09 19:36:51+00:00): Salut. Nu ai corecta. Ai facut praf. Exista track GPX pe acel drum inregistrat conform situatiei in teren. Te rog sa veriffic existanta treackurilor inainte sa mai corectezi drumuri. Nu exista drumuri puse aici fara trackuri gpx. Nu este nevoie de corectii. Multumesc.
literan (2024-10-22 17:36:11+00:00): почему вы добавляете стоматологию как больницу? вы полагаете, что в стоматологии люди лежат неделями на койке?

также, не надо вставлять в поле названия описания точек (как на русском, так и на других языках). Dental Clinic - это задается тегами. Внимательно прочитайте правила, пожалуйста: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#%D0%98%D0%BC%D1%8F_%E2%80%93_%D1%8D%D1%82%D0%BE_%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%B8_%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%BA%D0%BE
literan (2024-10-22 17:38:58+00:00): также, вы в неверном формате добавили адрес на точку (addr:housenumber=34к1). Адреса на точках необязательны, но если вы их добавляете, добавляйте корректно (можно посмотреть на адресе дома, например). Конкретно в этом месте был нужен пробел: 34 к1
MarcoR (2024-10-23 12:59:25+00:00): Come mai lo hai eliminato? È stato demolito?
Jo sóc jo (2024-10-23 05:33:17+00:00): Bon dia digital_analyst3, estàs segur que aquest hotel està a Barcelona? I el no del carrer no seria Carrer de la Vila i prou? Potser has intentat posar un addr:place conjuntament amb el addr:street?
Salutacions
eggie (2024-10-22 15:52:00+00:00): Dag Tim, 
Je zult best gelijk hebben, maar de naam Buinenveen komt niet voor als officieel uitgegeven straatnaam. Wat is je bron in deze. Mocht de naam in het veld bestaan zou je dat kunnen doorgeven aan het Kadaster/BGT zodat het officieel in de administratie verwerkt kan worden.
Een terugmelding kan hier.. https://www.verbeterdekaart.nl/#?geometry.x=215398.9&geometry.y=534625.92&zoomlevel=11.75

MVG
eggie
George Sears (2024-10-22 15:11:28+00:00): Come mai hai eliminato l'area residential di Canosa di Puglia?
makakko (2024-10-23 09:39:58+00:00): chiedo scusa,l'avevo cancellata perchè mi passava sopra un'infinità di edifici e pensavo di di far prima a rifarla, poi sono stato interrotto e mi è passata
George Sears (2024-10-23 11:43:25+00:00): Ciao, ho letto il tuo messaggio, rispondo comunque qui così è visibile a tutti.
Ho già ripristinato l'area, infatti ho pure corretto i segmenti che passavano sugli edifici, sono certo che si può ancora migliorare per escludere le aree che non sono prettamente residenziali, ma per adesso penso sia accettabile.
aTarom (2024-10-22 16:13:46+00:00): hola, gràcies per editar, un dubte si us plau
la doble "M"
a
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/906913411/history

"MMuseum of Santa María"
es per MataróMuseum...?
o una errada de teclat?

Salutacions
maro21 (2024-10-28 00:26:47+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/messages/1196962
Leo Slager (2024-10-22 23:05:54+00:00): Bij Hoogkarspel rijdt de bus nu over al die voetpaden ?
Ik pas het even aan.
Leo Slager (2024-10-22 23:08:38+00:00): Bij Hoogkarspel rijden de bussen nu over de voetpaden ?
Ben toch nieuwsgierig hoe je dat voor elkaar hebt gekregen ?
Ik pas het even aan.
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=5.18239&lat=52.68980&zoom=17&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.80&overlays=ptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes
dvdhoven (2024-10-23 05:33:14+00:00): Sorry, even niet goed genoeg opgelet.
Bedankt voor het herstellen.
Hoe ik dat voor elkaar heb gekregen? 
More Tools > Replace membership.
Die gebruik ik heel veel om bijv. wandelroutes van allerlei wegen om te leggen naar bijv. voetpaden.
Alleen heb ik hier niet goed genoeg gechecked of er nog andere routes zijn.

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
MarbleRock (2024-10-22 16:40:46+00:00): Bok, ako nogostup ima biciklističku stazu ne stavlja se highway=footway. Stavlja se highway=cycleway uz tagove bicycle=designated i foot=designated. Nije pogrešno ako je negdje već na karti staza označena s highway=path, to je samo drugi način označavanja.

Više o tome pročitaj na https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dcycleway
luximo (2024-10-24 05:37:24+00:00): Bok, hvala na ispravku, ali ako je uz cestu, ne bi li onda trebao biti sidewalk, a cycle (i foot) path ako je nesto kao Greenway (odvojeno od ceste)?
MarbleRock (2024-10-25 08:01:52+00:00): Jer je biciklističko-pješačka staza je kategorija staze za sebe, bila ona uz cestu ili nešto dalje. Na standardnoj karti bi trebale biti plavo označene preko highway=cycleway ili highway=path.

Možeš na nju dodati footway=sidewalk ako je uz cestu, ali samo nemoj koristiti higway=footway jer je u tom slučaju staze postanu crvene na karti te ih je teže uočiti.

Greenway je poseban slučaj jer je ISKLJUČIVO biciklistička staza. Kretanje pješaka na njoj ne neodređeno (nema nikakve zabrane pješake, a nema ni propisani dio staze za njihovo kretanje), pa tag foot= izostaje
Frans S (2024-10-22 14:57:59+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
Issues found on your mappings

A: Inaccurate mapping.
C: Collecting adjacent buildings and mapped is as 1 building.
D: Connecting Nodes to other features.
E: Buildings not squared.
H: Included a yard of clearing.
High building(s) incorrect mapped. See par 20 chapter About Buildings
Check the issue triangle before you upload your mappings and correct the issues.

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
BáthoryPéter (2024-10-23 21:24:45+00:00): Szia!
Ez (és a másik) milyen típusú traffipax? Trafibox?

A traffixpax pont az út része kell legyen, tehát ne mellé rakd, hanem csatold hozzá.
Lásd a dokumentációt: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dspeed_camera
Babrax (2024-10-24 16:16:53+00:00): Szia Péter, fehér lézeres traffibox mindkettő, nemrég szerelték fel őket. Típust és más adatot nem tudok. Üdv, Gábor
BáthoryPéter (2024-10-24 21:21:30+00:00): Köszi a választ! Akkor a jelölése jó így, csak a helye nem. Bekötöd az útba, vagy segítsek benne?
TrickyFoxy (2024-10-22 15:20:38+00:00): Это неправильно. То что вы пытались обозначить уже обозначено здесь https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/88803981
TrickyFoxy (2024-10-22 15:20:56+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158216725
aixbrick (2024-10-23 09:27:12+00:00): Hallo,
du hast bei jedem Gebäude "amenity=school" ergänzt. Es gibt hier aber keine 17 Schulen, sondern 3 und diese sind bereits als Fläche eingetragen. Außerdem gehört auch nicht der Schulname an jedes Gebäude. Ich habe das daher rückgängig gemacht (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158243908), "school:gender" habe ich dabei auf die Fläche übertragen.
Gruß
Noël Köthe (2024-10-23 10:43:34+00:00): alles klar.
Danke.
maro21 (2024-10-28 00:24:51+00:00): Proszę nie wpisywać komentarzy w polu nazwy.
dkiselev (2024-10-28 12:59:15+00:00): Hi Sbanalla, congrats on your first edit, welcome. 

Tho dedicated bus lanes are marked differently: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bus_lanes

So instead of making a separate way tagged as motorway with name bus, use lanes:psv= on ways for Oxford street

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/612618149
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/977069063
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1243077884
Marek-M (2024-10-22 18:07:47+00:00): Cześć, nie wrzucaj proszę zbędnych węzłów na liniach `highway` - niczemu to nie służy a nawigacje mają więcej obliczeń. Jak chcesz obrazować teren, to możesz używać `area:highway` lub `landuse`.
WTGZ_ (2024-10-25 14:22:52+00:00): Jasne, dzięki za pomoc
Aleksei Gurianov (2024-10-23 12:28:36+00:00): Please prefer to use Esri Aerial Imagery instead of Bing. They are much better aligned
hocu (2024-10-23 12:58:31+00:00): Hi Aleksei, thanks for the heads up. I will keep that in mind next time.
GerdP (2024-10-23 08:07:41+00:00): Korrektur Copy+Paste Fehler: Radtour am 20.10.2024
pantufla (2024-10-23 20:52:28+00:00): Thank you for editing in Venezuela :)
literan (2024-10-22 18:11:00+00:00): пожалуйста, не пишите в поле name описания типа "начала завалов". Это поле для имен собственных. Используйте тег description
eggie (2024-10-22 15:32:08+00:00): Dag Noud.. Je vraagt feedback 
Je hebt hier wegdelen en landuse  verknoopt met een administratieve grens. 
De administratieve grenzen worden beheerd door medemapper Sebastic. 

Er is hier wel een officiële correctie geweest met een stuk grond dat naar Vlaanderen is gegaan. 
Wat was hier allemaal verkeerd en wat is je bron in deze?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-10-22 15:33:55+00:00): Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=158216555
eggie (2024-10-22 15:35:50+00:00): Ik zie dat je het niet nodig vindt om te reageren op opmerklingen op de changesets. Ben toch wel benieuwd waarom niet? 
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=18371335

MVG
eggie
sebastic (2024-10-22 16:12:20+00:00): admin_level=11 wordt niet meer gebruikt in Nederland.

Woonplaatsen (admin_level=10) zijn de kleinste administratieve eenheid.

De juiste tags voor plaatsen (wijken, buurten, dorpen, etc) die binnen een woonplaats van vallen zijn:

boundary=place
place=*
Sidhesh Kalyankar (2024-10-22 15:24:20+00:00): Clothing Store Lots of variety in the shop from children to old man their are cloths
muralito (2024-10-22 21:14:21+00:00): Hi. Name should'nt be tagged in the raceway, but in the whole leisure https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/114359980 , which should be updated btw.
Jordi MF (2024-10-22 17:25:44+00:00): Hola Ramon,

Gràcies per millorar les dades d'OSM. Pel que fa al nom que has afegit al corral Campetxano, si et fixes, la cisterna ja està mapejada com a aljub i amb el seu nom. Per això, no recomane repetir el nom en el corral i deixar l'edifici del corral com a "Corral Campetxano".

Salutacions,
Jordi MF
Jordi MF (2024-10-22 19:01:45+00:00): Se m'ha oblidat afegir l'enllaç de la cisterna: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9482001857

Sobre l'ús de la preposició i article, ho deixe al teu criteri si ho coneixes millor que jo.
aTarom (2024-10-23 08:05:53+00:00): Hola, gracias por editar, una consulta por favor, la elevación de
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9258567504/history
273 metros, como la has obtenido? es quizás el fondo del sinkhole (depth)? desconozco totalmente la zona pero me ha llamado la atención la diferencia con la altura de superficie MDT que debe estar sobre los 408 metros
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sinkhole=pit?uselang=en
Saludos
Jordi MF (2024-10-26 12:20:47+00:00): Per una altra banda, he vist que l'altura d'este mur de contenció és de més de 100 m, la qual cosa no és certa. Ramon, podries confirmar quina altura és? Què fem si no respon? Eliminem la dada d'altura si l'editor no ens resol el dubte?

Salutacions
eggie (2024-10-22 15:38:01+00:00): Wat bedoel je met 11 in je commentaar?
Je reageert helaas niet op vragen vanuit de community.
MVG
eggie
citrula (2024-10-22 21:24:58+00:00): Welcome to OSM. Thanks for your contribution!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158217344
NorthCrab_upload (2024-10-22 15:41:16+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Podana kombinacja addr:city + addr:place jest nieprawidłowa. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, usuń addr:place i zastosuj kombinację addr:city + addr:street. Jeśli nie, pozostaw tylko addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2743975605
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/502875968
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/502875971
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/502876008
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/502876011
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/502876012
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/502876028
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/502876029
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/502876033
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/502877929
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/502878139
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/502878336
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/502878338
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/996264895

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.

"Domatków Brzezówka":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/502875967
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/502875970
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/502876007
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/502876009
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/502876030
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/502876031
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/502878332

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Patryk2710 (2024-10-29 20:18:59+00:00): witaj, "Droga Gminna" nie jest nazwą ulicy, nie dodajemy takich nazw
ma-rt-in (2024-11-02 09:13:36+00:00): Hallo,
dein ergänzter tag ist nur für geschlossene Ways zugelassen, nicht für einfache Ways.
Was genau war deine Absicht mit der Ergänzung?

vg
Hufkratzer (2024-10-22 21:34:05+00:00): Hi,
die Flächen, die du kürzlich (und auch früher) mit leisure=horse_riding getaggt hast (z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1327270625 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1327270626), sehen (auf den Luftbildern) nicht aus wie Reitanlagen (im Sinne von https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure=horse_riding), die sehen aus wie Reitplätze oder wie Paddocks. In OSM werden Reitplätze üblicherweise mit leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian getaggt, so wie z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1026792395 (von dir früher auch schon verwendet). Paddocks kann man z.B. mit https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:landuse=animal_keeping taggen.

In JOSM kann man Reitplätze mit dem Preset "Pferdesport" taggen (wird leider nicht gefunden wenn man nach "Reitplatz" sucht).

Hier noch zwei Beispiele aus deiner Gegend, wo die Tags richtig verwendet wurden:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1118422617#map=16/49.30961/11.93255&layers=P
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/178300008#map=18/48.485631/11.925407&layers=P
vgl. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a/R#Reitstall
k127 (2024-10-23 15:17:40+00:00): Hallo, danke für den Hinweis.

Ist nun geändert für die Objekte [1], [2]: <https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158259072>


Beste Grüße
k127


[1] <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1327270625>
[2] <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1327270626>
Fischkopp0815 (2024-10-24 08:13:12+00:00): Du hast vor kurzem diesen Weg neu erstellt.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1327270854

Kann es sein das er etwa hier

https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=54.215153&mlon=9.106067#map=17/54.215153/9.106062

mit diesem Weg verbunden ist?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/156389149

Der Abstand beträgt z.Z. nur etwa 10m. Bitte prüfe das mal.
ffn-hydrant (2024-10-24 09:39:16+00:00): Die Verbindung mit diesem Weg
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/156389149
kann ich momentan leider weder Bestätigen noch Dementieren. Wenn ich das nächste Mal dort vorbei komme, werde ich nachsehen.
lefuturiste (2024-10-22 15:49:36+00:00): Suppression
SekeRob (2024-10-28 04:37:21+00:00): Hi

You broke routing instead of fixing. Look at lanes forward. backward. turn lanes and destination lanes. Does no longer add up and Osmose diagnoses aame. Think you need to revert. 

Happy Fixing.
f_gonella (2024-11-05 08:47:34+00:00): Tried to fix routing using Trunks/Motorway slip ramps as used on the rest of the road network I'm familiar with.
CurlingMan13 (2024-10-24 00:23:46+00:00): Looks like a good edit.  Keep up the good work.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158219494