piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Graf Westerholt (2025-08-03 15:06:22+00:00): Vielleicht liest du mal https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:payment:* durch, schaust deine Änderungen an und überlegst dir, ob die Nutzung von StreetComplete sinnvoll ist.
Fumasu (2025-08-03 16:43:05+00:00): StreetComplete ist ein extrem nützliches Werkzeug zur Pflege der OSM. Probleme mit dem resultierenden Tagging sollten direkt an die Maintainer herangetragen werden. Zum Thema payment haben sie sich aber schon geäußert und ich stimme ihnen da zu: https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete/issues/3219#issuecomment-1609338131

Des Weiteren halte ich solche passiv-aggressiven, herabschauenden Kommentare in einem Community-Projekt für nicht hilfreich.
Graf Westerholt (2025-08-03 17:02:26+00:00): Du bist sicher auch der Meinung, dass ein Waffenhersteller Schuld ist, wenn mit einer seiner Waffe jemand verletzt wurde, oder? Dann sehe ich keine andere Möglichkeit, als das beim nächsten Mal der Community zu übergeben. Ich bin nicht dafür da, alle Fehler zu korrigieren und jedem zu erklären, wie die Einträge gemacht werden.
Fumasu (2025-08-03 17:19:48+00:00): Do what you have to do. Hier bist du mMn aber auf dem Holzweg. Schönen Tag noch.
Aim311_ (2025-07-10 08:13:52+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12858705793 na pewno można w tym miejscu naładować rower lub auto elektryczne?
MassCartog (2025-05-23 22:55:54+00:00): Hi welcome to OSM. Looks like you might have gotten carried away and removed a path that DOES seems to exist. See picture here:
https://i.imgur.com/wMdkpbC.jpeg

Its the trail on the east side of the park leading to Larkspur Lane. 

Please repair this, and be careful removing features from OSM!

Also note: removing "nonexistent" is good! but removing "unofficial" is wrong, unofficial paths should not be removed from the map! Please read these wiki pages for more info:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won't_delete_roads_on_private_property
MassCartog (2025-05-26 12:57:50+00:00): [no response from user, fixed myself]
tordans (2025-05-26 04:53:01+00:00): Wow, sogar vor dem Erscheinen des Artikels schon in OSM :-D
https://facettenneukoelln.wordpress.com/2025/05/24/vier-stolpersteine-fuer-eine-widerstaendige-familie-in-der-donaustrasse/
HugoC01 (2025-05-24 07:08:54+00:00): Je revert ce changesets car vous avez mis de fausses hauteurs

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166683139
MxxCon (2025-05-27 19:48:31+00:00): Hello.
Are these speed limits accurate? Seems a bit strange to be so high in a building passage and such a busy area.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166671522
user_5359 (2025-05-24 09:54:52+00:00): Welcome to OSM! A name isn't an address! Please move the address to a building.
i2004 (2025-05-24 02:22:47+00:00): https://www.sanisidro.gob.ar/novedades/un-nuevo-recorrido-de-la-l%C3%ADnea-707-mejorar%C3%A1-la-movilidad-para-los-usuarios
felipeeugenio (2025-05-23 20:17:00+00:00): Hola. gracias por sus ediciones. Se ve que conoce el lugar.
Pero por favor no alterar los datos del MOP (ref= o official_name).
saludos.
mweper (2025-05-23 21:56:04+00:00): Hola Nahuel. 
Veo que has borrado las interpolaciones anteriores que estaban bien separadas y creaste una interpolación grande unida. 

Por lo general, las líneas de interpolación se deberían mapear independientes en cada cuadra, es decir, no deberían cruzar por encima de las líneas de las calles.
En este caso, se deberían dividir en 3 por cada lado de la calle. 

¿Cuál fue el motivo de esta unión?
TrickyFoxy (2025-05-23 23:02:16+00:00): Нет, это неправильный формат адреса, не нужно ничего сокращать

https://osm.wiki/RU:Россия/Соглашение_об_именовании_дорог
Armando Hasanbelliu (2025-05-23 22:47:21+00:00): Questa modifica è uscita grande perché ho collegato 3 ferrovie divise
Jrachi (2025-05-25 05:27:44+00:00): Ciao.
Nella relazione hai inserito il torrente Marina.
Spero sia stato un errore!

Ivo
JeroenHoek (2025-05-24 06:49:59+00:00): building=shed? Zou je eens willen kijken wat hier misgaat met importeren? Dit zijn allemaal drielaagse units met woonbestemming.
E de Wit (2025-05-24 07:55:22+00:00): Is overgenomen van de vorige changeset zo te zien.
Die van jezelf :)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152809184
JeroenHoek (2025-05-24 08:57:11+00:00): Ja dat waren die units op de hoek die als construction=yes er in stonden. Die hebben volgens mij ook geen woonfunctie. Dat klopt ook wel, maar nu ze samen zijn gevoegd met alle woningen is dat niet de juiste tag voor het geheel.
E de Wit (2025-05-24 14:44:07+00:00): Ah ja ik zie het, volgens mij ook niet.
Dit is inderdaad gewoon building=apartments
Sander H (2025-05-24 15:24:16+00:00): Goed gezien. Was mij niet opgevallen. Heb het gecorrigeerd.
mcliquid (2025-05-24 08:10:59+00:00): Hi and thank you for your contribution!

Please note for the future: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
NeisBot (2025-05-23 20:54:53+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
Calm Dental (2025-05-23 20:59:12+00:00): Added a business - dentist
rskedgell (2025-05-24 05:30:19+00:00): You have also moved the tags of a hump on Crimscott Street to the entrance of Bridewain Street.

1) Has the speed hump on Crimscott Street been removed?

2) Has the row of concrete bollards acting as a modal filter on Bridewain Street been supplemented by a speed hump?

The ref:GB:tflcid=RWG079969 tag applies only to one surveyed feature in one location, which is clearly not on Bridewain Street.
https://cycleassetimages.data.tfl.gov.uk/RWG079969_1.jpg
https://cycleassetimages.data.tfl.gov.uk/RWG079969_2.jpg
Calm Dental (2025-05-24 07:50:24+00:00): Apologies, that was due to my inexperience. 

1. There are 2 bumps on Crimscott Street

2. No, there is still a row of concrete bollards. 

I appreciate your understanding, is it possible to revert these changes?
rskedgell (2025-05-24 10:31:37+00:00): Thanks for confirming, restored in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166690175
NeisReview (2025-05-24 07:42:52+00:00): #NameChanges

Hi, welcome to OSM.

In the past 12 hours, you have made numerous name changes across various changesets. This included modifying names as well as removing other name:*. Are these changes being made in coordination with the local community? Additionally, could you share more information about your sources?

I would appreciate a response.

Thank you.
jptolosa (2025-05-26 21:46:27+00:00): Hola, no se debe quitar la mayúscula al comienzo de la palabra "Básica".
Saludos.
Gabriel Palma Ojeda (2025-05-29 13:28:57+00:00): Perfecto
bartgron (2025-05-23 22:07:40+00:00): Czy to jest na pewno placówka dyplomatyczna? Jeśli tak to jaka (jakiego państwa itp)?
NeisReview (2025-05-24 07:42:43+00:00): #NameChanges

Hi, welcome to OSM.

In the past 12 hours, you have made numerous name changes across various changesets. This included modifying names as well as removing other name:*. Are these changes being made in coordination with the local community? Additionally, could you share more information about your sources?

I would appreciate a response.

Thank you.
Glassman (2025-05-24 20:21:59+00:00): Could the detention structure be more like a dike than an dam? 

Also, when removing a business, it is better to adjust the geometry as needed so the address and history of the object is saved.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166674380
felipeeugenio (2025-05-23 21:29:24+00:00): Hola. Building= es para las estructuras. no para el recinto completo.

ahí lo corregí.
Saludos
Gabriel Palma Ojeda (2025-05-29 13:29:31+00:00): Entendido.
wolfy1339 (2025-06-05 22:49:39+00:00): Your changeset has been reverted.

Community consensus is that this road is not a trunk road. Please do not re-tag it as so

Please read the following community discussion
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/route-du-president-kennedy-saint-georges-to-maine-usa-trunk-road-or-not/117398
MxxCon (2025-05-27 20:27:07+00:00): Why these crosswalks are not straight ways?🤣😭
In case you are not aware, you can select a way and press "S" shortcut to make it straight.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166675315
VLD283 (2025-05-27 20:52:03+00:00): Thank you for the suggestion! I appreciate it and will use that shortcut moving forward.
user_5359 (2025-05-24 09:46:35+00:00): Welcome to OSM! What ist the mean of the used keys (not a single OSM key)?
Clearance=None
Common=Vacant Planting Site
Crown Diameter=0
Exact DBH=0
Exact Height=0
Fictitious=N
Growspace Size=4
GrowspaceType=Tree Well
Hardscape Damage=No
No. of Trunks=0
On Street=N Main Street
Property Address No.=54
Property Street=N Main Street
Recommended Maintenance=Plant
Risk Rating=N/A
Side=Front
Species=Vacant Planting Site
Tree Condition=Vacancy
Tree ID=698
Utility Present=N
?
May the data record be imported (what license does it have)?
mueschel (2025-05-25 09:03:32+00:00): Welcome to OSM!

These edits look like you dumped a local data set into the OSM database.  Unfortunately this is not the correct way to import external data and make it usable within OSM.
Please have a look at our import guidelines:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines

I'll revert these additions for now so that you can first sanitize the data and then reimport it following the mandatory guidelines.
Lauren Kovacs (2025-05-25 16:23:12+00:00): Thank you so much. I tried to read as much as I could but clearly missed this important info. Did you delete the additional points (all points) I've uploaded so far? If not, please do. Thanks again.
user_5359 (2025-05-24 11:24:32+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please use the key building for a single building not for a collection of buildings with open spaces in between.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-23 23:33:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166677566 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals. See osm.org/user_blocks/18277 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-23 23:33:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166677566 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals. See osm.org/user_blocks/18277 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-23 23:33:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166677566 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals. See osm.org/user_blocks/18277 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-23 23:33:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166677566 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals. See osm.org/user_blocks/18277 and links from there
Gregory Peony (2025-06-03 05:24:14+00:00): Hi please do not delete POIs like the water point mapped here. I do not think that the imagery provides sufficient evidence for its deletion and it was originally stated to have been added after a survey. It is a feature beyond the scope of the project and does not appear to interfere with building footprints.--- I undeleted this feature in Changeset: 167116981 Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166676210
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-23 23:33:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166677566 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals. See osm.org/user_blocks/18277 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-23 23:34:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166677566 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals. See osm.org/user_blocks/18277 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-23 23:33:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166677566 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals. See osm.org/user_blocks/18277 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-23 23:34:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166677566 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals. See osm.org/user_blocks/18277 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-23 23:34:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166677566 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals. See osm.org/user_blocks/18277 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-23 23:34:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166677566 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals. See osm.org/user_blocks/18277 and links from there
Robbie2012 (2025-05-25 10:03:51+00:00): I've deleted lots of houses and addresses around Bewsey, and created one industrial area and two construction areas. You've reverted it, Jez
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-23 23:33:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166677566 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals. See osm.org/user_blocks/18277 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-23 23:33:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166677566 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals. See osm.org/user_blocks/18277 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-23 23:33:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166677566 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals. See osm.org/user_blocks/18277 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-23 23:33:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166677566 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals. See osm.org/user_blocks/18277 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-23 23:33:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166677566 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals. See osm.org/user_blocks/18277 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-23 23:33:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166677566 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals. See osm.org/user_blocks/18277 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-23 23:33:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166677566 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals. See osm.org/user_blocks/18277 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-23 23:33:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166677566 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals. See osm.org/user_blocks/18277 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-23 23:33:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166677566 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals. See osm.org/user_blocks/18277 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-23 23:33:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166677566 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals. See osm.org/user_blocks/18277 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-23 23:33:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166677566 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals. See osm.org/user_blocks/18277 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-23 23:33:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166677566 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals. See osm.org/user_blocks/18277 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-23 23:34:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166677566 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals. See osm.org/user_blocks/18277 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-23 23:33:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166677566 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals. See osm.org/user_blocks/18277 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-23 23:33:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166677566 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals. See osm.org/user_blocks/18277 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-23 23:33:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166677566 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals. See osm.org/user_blocks/18277 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-23 23:34:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166677566 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals. See osm.org/user_blocks/18277 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-23 23:33:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166677566 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals. See osm.org/user_blocks/18277 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-23 23:33:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166677566 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals. See osm.org/user_blocks/18277 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-23 23:33:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166677566 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals. See osm.org/user_blocks/18277 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-23 23:33:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166677566 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals. See osm.org/user_blocks/18277 and links from there
ceirios (2025-05-24 07:36:54+00:00): oops, this was meant to say "remove temporary feature"
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-23 23:33:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166677566 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals. See osm.org/user_blocks/18277 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-23 23:34:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166677566 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals. See osm.org/user_blocks/18277 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-23 23:33:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166677566 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals. See osm.org/user_blocks/18277 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-23 23:33:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166677566 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals. See osm.org/user_blocks/18277 and links from there
vasony (2025-05-28 18:38:31+00:00): Szia!

Nemzeti Összetartozás terét az önkormányzat 2020-ban hivatalosan nevezte el, így nem loc_name

Tamás
leveskockaa (2025-05-29 11:23:34+00:00): Szia!
Köszi, ez elkerülte a figyelmem.
Sylabowy Kot (2025-05-24 09:20:37+00:00): Przez "wnioski" mam na myśli wnioski do planu ogólnego.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-23 23:33:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166677566 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals. See osm.org/user_blocks/18277 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-23 23:33:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166677566 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals. See osm.org/user_blocks/18277 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-23 23:33:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166677566 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals. See osm.org/user_blocks/18277 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-23 23:34:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166677566 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals. See osm.org/user_blocks/18277 and links from there
user_5359 (2025-05-24 10:28:42+00:00): Hallo! Hier ist Dir wohl ein Kopierfehler unterlaufen. Bitte schau Dir nochmal das Gebäude (https://www.osm.org/way/93862174/history) an.
nw520 (2025-05-24 23:47:41+00:00): Hallo user_5359, das war tatsächlich ein Kopieren-/Einfügen-Fehler. Danke für den Hinweis und das Korrigieren!
wireguy (2025-07-28 17:09:33+00:00): Relation: 19167715
is unclosed, and overly complicated.  It should be broken into simple ways.

many of the other landuse relations with just outers should be simplified to help prevent breakage.
Udarian (2025-07-28 18:21:57+00:00): While I agree that 1916775 was overly complicated and I fixed it I do not agree with the rest, I personally find multipolygons easier to maintain and deal with for land use then areas, plus it minimizes the amount of duplicate faces in the land use. I will deal with any breakages my self. I will ensure that I check tools like osmi more often to check for these kinds of issues.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-23 23:34:08+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 166676157, 166676168, 166676182, 166676194, 166676218, 166676245, 166676298, 166676308, 166676317, 166676347, 166676540, 166676614, 166676631, 166676678, 166676698, 166676704, 166676715, 166676725, 166676736, 166676746, 166676771, 166676777, 166676783, 166676794, 166676800, 166676817, 166676827, 166676833, 166676841, 166676891, 166676897, 166676907, 166676936, 166676939, 166676950, 166676966, 166676974, 166677023, 166677027, 166677057, 166677060, 166677066, 166677085, 166677092, 166677098, 166677104, 166677110, 166677120, 166677122, 166677152, 166677166, 166677170, 166677175, 166677181, 166677193, 166677200, 166677216, 166677218, 166677224, 166677226, 166677239, 166677245, 166677252, 166677265, 166677270, 166677276, 166677282, 166677294, 166677318, 166677331, 166677334, 166677343, 166677351, 166677353, 166677364, 166677374, 166677381, 166677394, 166677399, 166677418, 166677430, 166677441, 166677451, 166677463, 166677476, 166677480, 166677489, 166677496.
jeslop (2025-05-24 07:37:56+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166683805
jeslop (2025-05-24 07:37:57+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166683805
NorthCrab_upload (2025-05-23 23:50:46+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1389201136

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
jeslop (2025-05-24 07:37:58+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166683805
jeslop (2025-05-24 07:37:59+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166683805
FroschForscher (2025-05-24 07:17:42+00:00): Hello osmoso,
why do you delete this parking?
There is a parking there. Land-ownership and/or access can and should be added but do not remove the fact that the area is used for parking.

FroschForscher
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166677856