piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-16 07:45:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166336102 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18187 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-16 07:44:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166336061 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18187 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-16 07:44:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166336061 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18187 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-16 07:45:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166336102 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18187 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-16 07:44:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166336061 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18187 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-16 07:45:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166336102 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18187 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-16 07:44:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166336061 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18187 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-16 07:45:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166336102 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18187 and links from there
TheLNL (2025-10-26 08:08:23+00:00): Last time I was here I didn't remember seeing any sign indicating a turn restriction (will look again when I next visit) . What source was used for this edit ?
TheLNL (2025-11-12 07:50:16+00:00): never mind, the change is correct
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-16 07:44:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166336061 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18187 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-16 07:44:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166336061 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18187 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-16 07:44:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166336061 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18187 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-16 07:44:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166336061 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18187 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-16 07:45:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166336102 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name removals.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18187 and links from there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-16 07:44:35+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 166330636, 166330643, 166333917, 166333948, 166333966, 166333979, 166333997, 166334022, 166334047, 166334071, 166334082, 166334102, 166334119, 166334131, 166334154, 166334184, 166334203, 166334230, 166334247, 166334265, 166334281, 166334308, 166334320, 166334345, 166334377, 166334390, 166334403, 166334449, 166334471, 166334499, 166334530, 166334548, 166334567, 166334614, 166334648, 166334655, 166334679, 166334696, 166334722, 166334781, 166334834, 166334859.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-16 07:45:25+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 166330636, 166330643, 166333917, 166333948, 166333966, 166333979, 166333997, 166334022, 166334047, 166334071, 166334082, 166334102, 166334119, 166334131, 166334154, 166334184, 166334203, 166334230, 166334247, 166334265, 166334281, 166334308, 166334320, 166334345, 166334377, 166334390, 166334403, 166334449, 166334471, 166334499, 166334530, 166334548, 166334567, 166334614, 166334648, 166334655, 166334679, 166334696, 166334722, 166334781, 166334834, 166334859.
Zrop (2025-05-16 11:38:58+00:00): Hallo Langlaeufer,
"sidewalk=no" und "foot=use_sidepath" passt irgendwie nicht zusammen. Ein "foot=use_sidepath" setzt einen separat eingezeichneten Gehweg voraus.
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an, Danke.

Gruß
Zrop
Langlaeufer (2025-05-16 11:41:53+00:00): Sidewalk no heißt das direkt neben der Fahrbahn kein Fußweg ist. use_sidepath kann auch zutreffen, wenn weitere Fahrbahnen dazwischenliegen z.B. bei Getrennten Richtungsfahrbahnen nur ein Gehweg vorhanden ist.
Langlaeufer (2025-05-16 11:56:48+00:00): in diesem fall ist der separate Gehweg an der anderen Richtungsfahrbahn.
Die Benutzungspflicht des Gehweges gilt ja für die ganze Straße und nicht nur für eine Richtungsfahrbahn. Oder ergibt sich für die ferne Richtungsfahrbahn dann ein echtes Nutzungsverbot?
Falls ich hier in der rechtlichen Interperation falsch liege können wir das gerne im Forum diskutieren.
Zrop (2025-05-16 15:19:58+00:00): also ich kann nirgendwo etwas darüber finden das "use_sidepath" auch für gegenüberliegende getrennt gemappte Richtungsfahrbahnen gilt, was auch keinen Sinn macht. Jeder eingezeichneter Weg/Straße bekommt seinen eigenen Attribute.
Du gibst ja auch nicht "sidewalk=left" an nur weil der gegenüberliegende Abschnitt einen Gehweg hat.
Langlaeufer (2025-05-16 18:12:29+00:00): eben weil ich nicht sidepath:left=separate angeben kann brauchtes ja auch zusätzlich use_sidepath. Das sagt, das der Way nicht benutzt werden darf weil es einen dazugehörigen separat erfassten Rad/Gehweg gibt der benutzungspflichtig ist.
Zrop (2025-05-16 19:23:48+00:00): genau, Du kannst "sidewalk:left=separate" nicht angeben weil es keinen separaten Gehweg gibt. Deswegen kannst Du auch kein "foot=use_sidepath" angeben.
Langlaeufer (2025-05-16 19:34:07+00:00): Use sidepath eine ist eine rechtliche bertachtung, sidewalk=separateandere eine topologische.
Mach gerne eine Diskussion im Forum auf, oder ändere es halt zu foot= no wenn du das für desser hältst. Aber warum wäre da Fußgehen verboten, wenn es keinen Gehweg gibt?
habi (2026-04-14 16:12:29+00:00): Ciao micrite
Here you've added `building:levels=rdc` which is not a correct value.
I also suppose that not the whole building is a https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:office%3Dcoworking, no?
Happy mapping,
habi
nathan_day (2025-05-16 11:07:34+00:00): Evidence:

https://x.com/SteaknShake/status/1920647356032139430
Kinsio (2025-05-22 02:48:58+00:00): For documentation's sake: I reverted this changeset in changeset #166546258, and discussion on this automated edit proposal is now taking place at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/steak-n-shake-bitcoin-tags/130380
bxl-forever (2025-05-16 12:25:00+00:00): Hello,

Addresses should not be added on POI, especially in Norway, where there is already a structured process to keep the address inventory clean and in sync with government data.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue/Address_import_for_Norway#Tagging_scheme

Also, please make sure to upload changes separately, especially when editing places in different countries or continents.  As a consequence of sending your edits in Mexico and Norway as one single upload, your changes are now showing as a huge bounding box covering most of Europe and Northern America.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks in advance.
simpliston (2025-05-16 12:49:43+00:00): Hi, these changes were submitted via Organic Maps. I'm not sure how it groups changes into changesets, but it seems like it does it over too large time spans. But I'll see if I can do something to divide the changesets into smaller pieces, or create an issue about it if it doesn't already exist.

About the addresses, I added them because Organic Maps lacked them. Either Organic Maps doesn't get these from the government data you mentioned, or it doesn't get used properly. When these addresses are missing, if you search for a location, you will not see the address to be able to disambiguate the locations. If you search for the name of a franchise, the only piece of information you will have to tell them apart will be the distance from your location, which is a poor user experience. If this is also a flaw in Organic Maps, I'll create an issue if it does not already exist. I want Organic Maps and OpenStreetMap to be useful to many people, so I try to add as much missing information as possible.
simpliston (2025-05-16 12:59:42+00:00): But it seems that many places don't get addresses from the sync feature at all. For instance, Joker Barcode doesn't appear to have anything like that. If the sync tool can't fix it, is it bad to add it manually? Does the sync tool actually cover shops, restaurants and other widely used places?
KatGaea (2025-05-17 13:55:41+00:00): The wiki page clearly explains that that method is wrong for Norway, even if Organic Maps expects it that way, so the fault does like with Organic Maps
bxl-forever (2025-05-17 16:05:43+00:00): @simpliston.  Yes, the problem is about the way Organic Maps computes addresses.  We see that problem very often: this app is able to associate a show with an address if the container building has address tags but does not recognize addresses as nodes… despite every geographical-aware application should.  (Especially because Norway, Denmark, Netherlands and other countries exclusively use nodes for addresses).

I understand the frustration as a user, but the best we can do it get Organic Maps devs to fix their app instead of changing data all over the world.
simpliston (2025-05-18 07:41:52+00:00): Alright, sounds good. I'll refrain from adding addresses in those countries. But we should push for Organic Maps to fix it on their end.
user_5359 (2025-05-17 17:34:57+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/relation/19136393, https://www.osm.org/relation/19136403. What is the mean of the key N?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-05-16 08:10:47+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 166322243, 166322685.
lyctkel (2025-12-05 05:54:47+00:00): Hi PPete2,
bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/166630051 hast Du 
noexit="Der Weg ..." geschrieben.
Das sieht seltsam aus, da laut Wiki nur noexit=yes vorgesehen ist.
Das sieht für mich aus, alsob description="Der Weg ..." gemeint war. 
Grüße,
lyctkel
PPete2 (2025-12-05 14:09:35+00:00): Ja du hast recht, da ist beim Tagging was schief gelaufen. Dieses Kommentar gehört nur in die beiden noexit-Notes
jjyach (2025-05-16 21:01:54+00:00): Correct, that CO one is a Denver Biscuit Company.  Steak N Shake was there a long time ago.
eggie (2025-05-16 09:30:27+00:00): Dag Prs  Het pad heb ik losgemaakt van de landuse.. Truc  Gebruik de linker alttoets tijdens intekenen. Dat voorkomt plakken.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=166338590
MVG
eggie
pavvv (2025-06-03 05:03:36+00:00): Pomimo tego, że iD tak sugeruje, nie dodawaj public_transport=platform do highway=platform. Ten pierwszy tag ma być jedynie na obiektach, które są częścią relacji autobusów, czyli highway=bus_stop.
TrickyFoxy (2025-05-16 22:42:25+00:00): Убрали?
user_5359 (2025-05-17 17:29:19+00:00): Hello! Please use the key departures_board instead of departure_board
yxoc (2025-05-18 00:04:18+00:00): Hallo,

yes of course, thanks for the notification (and thanks for fixing my mistakes!). I will watch out for this one in the future.
jeslop (2025-05-16 09:54:06+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166341116
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-06-05 16:13:42+00:00): https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=166339878

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31066340 definitely should not be a building

but is removal of research institute marking also a mistake?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-06-05 16:14:45+00:00): is removing parking marking from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/477139004/history intentional?
eggie (2025-05-16 09:53:05+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
literan (2025-05-17 11:00:32+00:00): а это неверно. Это два здания с одним адресом, а не одно большое здание
OSMchik (2025-05-19 08:16:36+00:00): Спасибо за замечание!
eggie (2025-05-16 09:55:58+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback   Wat zou de naam van deze Architectenlocatie zijn. Het is militair terrein?
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-05-16 11:36:52+00:00): Voorlopig architectenbureau zonder naam verwijderd.
mvg
eggie
chris66 (2026-07-26 17:49:37+00:00): Hi,
hier die EVSG Nummern für Station Senden LIDL :

https://up.picr.de/51136662ei.jpg
mcliquid (2025-05-19 07:33:15+00:00): Hi, sind die zahlreichen "level=0" wirklich sinnvoll? Ich meine, dass "level=0" als Standard angesehen wird.
NVBW_Edit_Eifelkobold (2025-05-19 10:30:30+00:00): Hi, natürlich ist level=0 üblicherweise der Standard. Ich hatte mich im Bahnhofsumfeld dennoch dafür entschieden, da es die Orientierung erleichtern kann. Zudem passten die Levelangaben vorher nicht immer zueinander (z.B. ging es von Level 1 auf -1). Um eine Eindeutigkeit herzustellen und die Falscherfassung z.B. durch Quest-Tools zu vermeiden, war ich bei diesem Bahnhof etwas großzügiger.

viele Grüße

Eifelkobold
mcliquid (2025-05-19 10:39:13+00:00): Hi, danke dir! Ich wunderte mich vor allem bei den Straßen, die nichts mit dem Bahnhof zu tun haben. Bspw. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4520207 oder https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4525707
Zumindest kann ich dort keinen Mehrwert für die Ergänzung feststellen, auch wenn es kein Datenfehler ist :)
adlan2001 (2025-06-08 16:50:22+00:00): Hi. I have to delete way 1386092433 because there is actually a double storey parking lot here.
GowanusCanal (2025-06-10 18:40:31+00:00): Hello adlan2001, I noticed that the imagery citation for this changeset contains the wrong date. The correct date of the imagery used is 04-01-2025, which shows arrows on road surfaces, suggesting that vehicles could travel inside the parking garage. Apple has an agreement with Maxar to use their more recent imagery to edit OpenStreetMap, which is not publicly available for editing OpenStreetMap. We generally use the imagery that is already available in JOSM but we reference it in specific cases like this, where recent construction isn't yet reflected in the standard imagery. Since it appears vehicles can enter the building, I can connect the service roads to the structure and apply the amenity=parking_entrance tag in accordance with OSM tagging guidelines (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=parking_entrance). Let me know if that sounds good to you.
adlan2001 (2025-06-11 07:57:15+00:00): Sounds good for me I think
DwarfNebula_ (2025-05-16 12:52:19+00:00): Hi Prino,

Als je het niet erg vindt verwijder ik je toegevoegde nodes weer. Beide staan namelijk al met de juiste tag op de kaart (zie reactie op je kaart opmerkingen). Daarnaast moet de naam die je iets geeft, de naam zijn waarmee het object bekend staat "liftplek naar het noorden/zuiden" is natuurlijk geen echte naam. Daarnaast moet de wikipedia/wikidata verwijzen naar het daadwerkelijke object, niet een algemene pagina over hitchhiking.

Mocht je aanvullingen hebben voor de al bestaande nodes, zijn deze natuurlijk welkom!
aceman444 (2025-08-21 19:44:01+00:00): Zdravim, pristup autom sa znaci motorcar=nieco . Ale myslim, ze uz to mate dobre, motorove vozidla ste dali nie, a dalsi pouzivatel Vam pomohol a dal motorcycle=yes, takze motorky uz mozu.

A aka "mapa nenaviguje"? V akom programe to skusate?
os-emmer (2025-06-01 15:48:09+00:00): Hello Niels Elgaard Larsen,
it seems that you added some objects with "amenity"="social_facility;social_facility=food_bank":
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/25gv
Did you mean "amenity"="social_facility";"social_facility"="food_bank" instead?
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2025-06-01 17:50:46+00:00): yes.
thank you, I fixed it
voschix (2025-08-02 20:40:10+00:00): Ciao,
I think it is not correct to tag the ZTL roads in Vicenza as pedestrian (which means no vehicles at all, in particolar no residents, no electric cars, no bicycles. 
See https://servizi2.comune.vicenza.it/utilita/restrictedtrafficzone.php
voschix (2025-08-02 21:14:04+00:00): Let me add: a simple revert will not fix the problem. The previous tagging was not correct either. Unfortunately every ZTL in Italy has different rules.
civ41 (2025-08-03 19:20:23+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for your comment. Let me clarify the reasoning behind this changeset.

Before my edit, the roads within the ZTL had inconsistent and often unclear tagging — a mix of residential, unclassified, and some pedestrian. I aimed to bring coherence by aligning the tagging across the area.

The choice of highway=pedestrian was deliberate and, in my opinion, appropriate. According to the OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpedestrian), this tag is used for roads “designated mainly or exclusively for pedestrians,” where “vehicle traffic is generally restricted.” That matches the character of these streets in Vicenza’s ZTL: people commonly walk in the middle of the carriageway, even when sidewalks exist, and motor vehicle access is tightly controlled.

This tagging practice is widely adopted in the historic centers of most cities in the Veneto region, where you can see many pedestrian streets.

I’m open to constructive discussion, but your comment doesn’t make clear what you propose instead — just that pedestrian is wrong and the previous situation was also wrong. If you have a concrete alternative in mind that improves tagging clarity while staying consistent with common mapping practice, ground truth, and provides a coherent solution for the entire ZTL, I’d be happy to consider it.

Best
voschix (2025-08-08 09:28:46+00:00): Ciao,
to me this seems to be a an incorrect interpretation. A highway=pedestrian is a road for pedestrians who can use the entire road space; vehicles, including bicycles, are not permitted. In an ZTL, roads do still generally have side walks for pedestrians and the carriage way is for vehicles, even though the vehicle traffic in a ZTL is limited to certain classes of vehicles. The details vary from city to city. I do not know the rules in Vicenza, there will be delibera by the Comune. Typically the following vehicles will be allowed: public transport, bicycles, emergency services, residents, electric vehicles, delivery vehicles (at certain hours), motor cycles, tourists that stay in hotels. The procedure for permits vary as well. In addition the ZTL restriction s are different for different times of the day or even different days of the week. An Area Pedonale is a completely different concept compared with a ZTL, and also "orthogonal" to it, in the sense that an Area Pedonale can exist inside an ZTL , but also outside. The tagging for any given ZTL is complex, and, as a consequence, many of them  are mapped incorrectly in OSM. In addition a ZTL can include also areas where only cars of residents in the specific streets are permitted. Another complication can be, as is the case in Padova, that the ZTL is subdivided in zones, and permits may only be valid for a specific zone inside the ZTL.
I have no correct tagging proposal myself for Vicenza, I only noted that your tagging is not correct. If the ZTL in Vicenza is similar to the one in Padova, then you could start with the Aree Pedonali (highway=pedestrian and bicycle=yes/no according to local signs, keeping in mind that an Area Pedonale sign without an explicit sign for the exclusion of bicycles needs bicycle=yes, otherwise bicycle=no. The ZTL could be modelled with conditional access to reflect the time-dependent access rules (If I remember well, the ZTL in Vicenza has fixed time window in the morning for deliveries.) The basic tag will most likely be motor_vehicles=private (this would include motor cycles). This assumes that every moto vehicle entering needs to have a personalised permit before entering. (attention: permit=yes is not correct, because that assumes that anyone can easily get it on request).
 Maybe we should launch a discussion in the Italy forum on this subject?
civ41 (2025-08-08 14:54:06+00:00): What do you think about Via Del Santo and Via San Francesco in Padua? They are both (partially) pedestrian. Do you think this is wrong? If not, why shouldn’t the same apply to the roads I have changed? This could help me understand, thank you.
Nicola
jeslop (2025-05-16 14:22:40+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166354059
jeslop (2025-05-16 14:22:41+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166354059
IvanBabić (2025-05-19 20:42:13+00:00): I revert it because a node was made #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166496255
TrickyFoxy (2025-05-16 12:26:01+00:00): 👋 В правом меню редактора есть кнопка «Настройки фонового изображения». Выберите там спутниковые снимки ESRI — они свежее
Ruim392 (2025-05-16 12:44:17+00:00): Да, спасибо за информацию
eggie (2025-05-16 11:11:58+00:00): Hoi.. je vraagt feedback. Wellicht shop=bicycle ?
Mvg
eggie
eggie (2025-05-16 11:40:08+00:00): Volgens het NH Dagblad 13 feb 2024 — Koog aan de ZaanHet vertrouwde en vriendelijke gezicht achter het fietsenwinkeltje naast station Koog aan de Zaan houdt er na tien jaar mee op.
artikel uit 2024
eggie (2025-05-16 11:44:38+00:00): De info heb ik verplaatst naar de adresnode zoals gebruikelijk in OSM.
Kennelijk bestaat de fietsenmaker nog.

MVG
eggie
Andrzej Jarmoniuk (2025-05-16 11:47:24+00:00): Net gecheckt (ik woon vlakbij). Die is er gewoon.
eggie (2025-05-16 11:51:21+00:00): Oke... Even CTRL f5 .. dan zie je het effect.
Mapse
eggie
eggie (2025-05-16 14:51:39+00:00): Al jaren een account bij OSM, maar nooit de welkomstmail ontvangen zie ik.. bij deze alsnog...Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
burrscurr (2025-05-23 11:10:42+00:00): Hi rompe,

danke fürs Eintragen von diesem Stolperstein! Gibt es einen besonderen Grund, warum du memorial:type=stolperstein statt memorial=stolperstein verwendet hast? (Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:memorial:type%3Dstolperstein)

Viele Grüße!
rompe (2025-05-23 23:30:45+00:00): Hallo,

der einzige Grund ist, dass ich noch nie Stolpersteine eingetragen habe und mich blind darauf verlassen habe, dass das JOSM-Preset " Stolpersteine - light version" schon alles richtig machen wird.

Danke für den Hinweis, ich mache das gleich sauber!
jeslop (2025-05-16 14:22:42+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166354059
Fizzie-DWG (2025-05-17 01:41:45+00:00): Hello Aksak. Where are you getting for information for adding these names and details, please? Graeme Fitzpatrick, Moderator, OSMF Data Working Group
NorthCrab_upload (2025-05-16 11:21:12+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.

"Szczechy Wielkie":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/571676879
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1387211293
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1387211295

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀