piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
kadiwa (2025-03-09 14:00:31+00:00): Bitte keine Beschreibungen als Name eintragen; sowas gehört in "description" oder "note".
Cyrille37 (2024-06-15 12:25:26+00:00): Bonjour Kalepom
Les plaques dans la Rue de Metz à Tours ne précise pas qu'il s'agit de la bataille Q688847. Je préconise de corriger pour la ville de Metz Q22690. Aurais-tu d'autres sources ?
Kalepom (2024-06-15 14:29:45+00:00): Salut Cyrille,
Oui, c'est ce qui est indiqué dans le livre Les noms des rues de Tours, qui est ma source principale pour ces contributions.
Cyrille37 (2024-06-16 08:38:30+00:00): Ah oui, tu m'avais dit. Merci :-)
MxxCon (2024-06-18 01:22:15+00:00): Hello.
You added a number of features with tags colour=Dresser and colour=APS BA.
These are invalid tag values.
Please see this article that documents how to use this tag https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:colour
These problems must be addressed.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152554851
MxxCon (2024-06-18 01:23:03+00:00): Also please write descriptive changeset comments. Leaving that field blank doesn't help other mappers understand what you are editing.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152554851
Joseph DiGiovanni (2024-06-18 02:15:00+00:00): Apologies, the first editor I used did not warn about changeset comments, and did not allow entry of custom keys. I have corrected most of these invalid color values and am now using the "model" key as I originally intended. Thanks for the feedback.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152554851
Joseph DiGiovanni (2024-06-18 02:32:02+00:00): Changeset 152805041 and 152825610 have the relevant fixes.
qugeb (2024-06-21 09:23:37+00:00): Hallo, 
ich habe diesen Changeset nun revertiert, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152983492

Auch wenn jetzt 'abgesegnet' ist, dass die Planungen für die StUB weitergehen dürfen, befinden sich diese noch nicht so weit, dass eine Erfassung auf OSM gerechtfertigt ist. Das Planfeststellungsverfahren beginnt frühestens 2025, daher ist die hier dargestellte Strecke sehr spekulativ und entspricht nicht dem OTG-Prinzip. 
Übrigens wurde mir im Humanitarian-Style die hier angelegte Strecke als normale Tram-Strecke dargestellt, sonst wäre es mir vermutlich nicht so schnell aufgefallen.
qugeb (2024-06-21 09:41:24+00:00): Da hier ja sicherlich einiges an Arbeit reingeflossen ist: Wenn du einen Export deiner Strecke als geojson,gpx o.ä. benötigst, helfe ich gerne dabei. Nur zum aktuellen Zeitpunkt hat es eben auf OSM noch nichts zu suchen.
Anas masuris (2024-06-12 14:39:23+00:00): O wow, super! Dzięki za edycję, wygląda to świetnie
bxl-forever (2024-08-13 14:09:30+00:00): Hello,

I am referring to this object you created:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1291530282

Please observe that:

* The name tag is solely for the official name of an object (roads, shops have names cables usually don’t).  "name=câble au sol inconnu" sounds really weird, this is a description.

* OSM is an international database, numerical values should be… numbers (obviously) and tags should be written in English.
"height=au sol" or "material=acier" will not be parsed correctly → use height=0 and material=steel to get the objects properly parsed in the database.

Hope this helps.
MeisterP (2024-06-29 19:23:50+00:00): You changed the road surface type of Oltenerstasse  to grass_paver which is clearly wrong. I think you meant to change the SidewalkSurface?
Anyhow, I've changed Oltenerstrasse back to asphalt. Maybe review your changes for similar mistakes.
PendlerMa (2024-06-29 19:44:27+00:00): I guess, I did it by mistake, and selected the wrong field in StreetComplete. For the sidewalk surface grass is for shure not right, too. It is on both sides asphalt.
uvi (2024-06-13 15:45:36+00:00): Gibt es noch weitere Informationen zum Zeltplatz (Toiletten/Duschen/Strom/...) muss man reservieren? Gibt es Kontaktdaten??´...
VG Uwe
ERZIDYLL (2024-07-27 19:03:30+00:00): Hallo Uwe,

Aktuell wird ein Sanitärgebäude mit Toiletten, Duschen und Behinderten-WC gebaut. Fertigstellung im Frühjahr 2025. Camper und Zeltgäste können trotzdem bereits kommen, Strom und Wasser ist vorhanden. Es gibt auch ein mobiles WC. 

Reservierung ist eigentlich nicht notwendig. Vorherige Kontaktaufnahme via per Mail oder Telefon wäre dennoch schön!

LG Markus vom ERZ.IDYLL
uvi (2024-07-28 08:07:16+00:00): Hallo Markus, ich habe jetz die Daten auf die von mir "vermutete" Fläche übertragenund noch einige Schlüssel ergänzt  (passt das sohttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1304215470?)
limes11 (2024-06-11 20:30:08+00:00): Hi, 

what are these two other POIs that you added ? "Schoenmaker" and "Hooischuur" without any attributes. 

If they do make sense - please add them in a separate changeset next time to avoid a changeset box spanning half of the world. 

Cheers !
goedegazelle (2024-06-12 11:32:05+00:00): The area with those new labels ("Schoenmaker" and "Hooischuur") is a museum. It are not real shops etc.. I have moved the names to the buildings and deleted the nodes.

The museum: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/688673876#map=16/52.7071/5.3001
limes11 (2024-06-12 12:27:07+00:00): I see, thanks. 

In that case, please add the actual tags describing the POI (at least tourism=museum and preferably also musem=* according to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:museum)
goedegazelle (2024-06-12 21:15:59+00:00): The museum is the area and has already been tagged properly. The link that I provided points to this area. It looks okay to me this way.
limes11 (2024-06-12 21:20:21+00:00): You're right - I did not read your message properly...
MxxCon (2024-06-18 01:32:26+00:00): Hello.
tactile_paving=* on the way it intended to indicate if the way itself has tactile paving. For example, here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Tactile_paving_on_crossing_ja.jpg
If you want to indicate that there's a tactile pavement on the CURB connecting to this crosswalk, you should tag just the intersecting crosswalk node instead. Also, the curb node itself should be tagged as well.
Furthermore, if you want to indicate that only one side of a curb with tactile payment, you should use value "incorrect" rather than "partial". It is documented at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tactile_paving
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152557106
VLD280 (2024-06-18 22:45:18+00:00): Hello MxxCon, 
Thank you for reaching out and offering your advice. I have updated the tactile_paving tags for the crossing to align better with the wiki guidance and your suggestions.
literan (2024-06-12 12:40:09+00:00): кривой формат адрески 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%90%D0%B4%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%B0#%D0%9D%D1%83%D0%BC%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%B2
Loboda83 (2024-06-14 07:07:08+00:00): Спасибо вам большое за инструкцию по правильному написанию нумерации домов. Впредь буду стараться не допускать подобных ошибок.
grzegorz75jan (2025-06-14 14:18:36+00:00): Miej, że litość https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1291539123#map=19/49.844620/20.740066&layers=N
c0nsumer (2026-01-05 02:20:42+00:00): @Trail_Caretaker / Shane: With this edit you removed a number of trail names from the Big M area. This has made it so electronic maps no longer match the signs physically on the ground.
Trail_Caretaker (2026-01-07 02:20:16+00:00): Steve, good catch.  I apologize to everyone for my mistake.  From what I can recall is that some of the trails had names of the trail markers they were book ended with, and some of the trails had words for names.  The only thing I can think of is the only map that I could find just had the trail markers on it and not the names with words.  Once again, I apologize for any hardships my mistake has caused.  Thank you also for fixing it.
Edison Wen (2024-06-12 13:44:30+00:00): 如果不大，可考慮用parking space?
silversurfer83 (2024-06-11 19:37:51+00:00): Hi :)

since you deleted the "fixme": What about the note? It says "impassable". Is this still true? Can this track be used by traktors or other off road machinery? can it be walked?

cheers
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152557516
faith_in_chaos (2024-06-11 22:19:31+00:00): it looks like its used by traktor but not regulary, so it will be overgrown from time to time.
silversurfer83 (2024-06-12 19:27:08+00:00): thanks for the reply :)

I saw your follow up. looks good
NorthCrab_upload (2024-06-11 19:00:16+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9574968430
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/152341786

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eggie (2024-06-12 06:11:16+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback  Hoe kan nu een adres zomaar veranderen.?  Waar is Boompjes 7A dan nu? 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-06-12 06:31:39+00:00): Adres 7A weer toegevoegd
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/?searchQuery=boompjes+9&objectId=0511100001944514&theme=BRT+Achtergrond&geometry.x=54867.718&geometry.y=425601.753&zoomlevel=15&bijbehorendeAdressen=Pand
Groet
eggie
Anders L (2026-06-02 17:42:03+00:00): Er der grund til at have to broer, hvor den i dette ændringssæt blot giver en grim, grå stribe i vektorkort?
osmviborg (2026-06-02 17:53:48+00:00): Lige efter bogen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man%20made=bridge?uselang=en
Anders L (2026-06-02 17:54:50+00:00): Jep, jeg kan se det. Undskyld forstyrrelsen :)
Anders L (2026-06-02 19:14:27+00:00): Jeg kan dog også se at denne feature er udeladt mange steder hvor fx en enkelt vej krydser en anden (eller noget), mens den er normal hvor en bro har flere veje. Den giver fx god mening på Svendborgsundbroen, men ikke på gangbroen over motorvejen længere inde på fyn. Jeg synes også den er overflødig her, da den ikke i øvrigt tilføjer noget til kortet - ingen øvrige tags. 
Visuelt skaber den lidt forstyrrelse med vektorkort hvis man zoomer langt ind, da den så fremstår bredere end landevejen.

Vh
Anders
osmviborg (2026-06-02 20:06:21+00:00): Brugt på 3811 polygoner over det ganske land, helt almindeligt. Det er op til den enkelte korviser at afgøre hvordan et element vises. OSM er en database, ikke et kort.
Anders L (2026-06-02 20:22:04+00:00): OSM er en database der *bruges* til at tegne kort, på automatiseret vis.

På godt og ondt er der få regler/retningslinjer, og de der er er ikke entydige, og bruges meget forskelligt.

Efter at have kigget mig omkring, er det et større problem at elementet udelades, end at det findes, se fx broer over Haderslev Fjord hvor det er udeladt - fungerer skidt når der er flere veje over en bro (men stadig fint hvor der kun er én).

Men OK, jeg kan jo godt arbejde med min vektor-stil og opnå et rimeligt kompromis. Jeg undrer mig blot over valget.
osmviborg (2026-06-02 20:34:56+00:00): Det er Niras der har designet broen, og kaldt den "Hvidkilde Stibro". Det er den tagget med nu, så er der da et navn på broen.
Anders L (2026-06-02 20:40:26+00:00): Herligt :) <3
marczoutendijk (2024-06-17 20:00:41+00:00): Hello albertoq,
Your changesetcomment is either "Edit" or "Add", but that is what all mappers do!
We would very much like to see what you have edited or added!
See this for the reason:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Could you change your mapping behaviour with respect to this?
Best regards,  
Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
marczoutendijk (2024-06-17 20:00:25+00:00): Hello albertoq,
Your changesetcomment is either "Edit" or "Add", but that is what all mappers do!
We would very much like to see what you have edited or added!
See this for the reason:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Could you change your mapping behaviour with respect to this?
Best regards,  
Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
RedAuburn (2024-06-11 22:30:02+00:00): thank you for resolving my note! :)
eerib (2024-06-11 19:45:32+00:00): Small typo in my changeset comment: bypass -> overpass
gmar5 (2024-06-11 21:42:00+00:00): Hi,

Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edit!

Just a couple of notes:

- This changeset contains an edit to Pawłosiow in Poland, and edits in Oxford. If you meant to edit Pawłosiow, it is better to do it in a separate changeset, to keep it small and local.
(See: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets)

- The 'name' should be a proper name, not a description. A lot of the names you assigned to natural and school elements in Blackbird Leys seem only descriptive (unless they are really referred to as Wood 1, etc.?).
(See: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only)

- Careful in applying appropriate tags (a basketball hoop is not a building, etc.) and not to break multipolygons.

Cheers. Enjoy mapping.

Best,
gmar
s_hietsch (2024-06-15 19:03:11+00:00): Cool, dass der unterirdische Krottenbach jetzt auch eingetragen ist!
Kurze Frage dazu: Wieso hast du tunnel=culvert und nicht tunnel=flooded verwendet? So wie ich die Dokumentation (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:waterway) lese, ist culvert eher für kurze Stücke, wo ein Bach eine Straße queren muss oder verstehe ich hier etwas falsch?
hlfan (2024-06-15 22:05:52+00:00): Über's Tagging hab ich mir ehrlich gesagt noch nicht so recht Gedanken gemacht, culvert ist ja in iD der Standardwert. Aber da das Kanalsystem afaik auch Luft führt wäre flooded eh falsch. Und technisch gesehen müssten die Abschnitte zwischen Sammelkanal und Donaukanal intermittent sein, weil es nur Überläufe sind. Nur ist mir das weitere Kanalnetz für OSM zu sehr out of scope.
s_hietsch (2024-06-16 09:16:40+00:00): Gemäß zweitem Beispiel im Wiki bei flooded (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Atunnel%3Dflooded) darf ein solcher Tunnel auch Luft führen. Viel mehr kann ich dazu aber leider nicht sagen - dafür kenne ich mich sowohl mit dem Wiener Kanalnetz als auch dem entsprechenden Tagging zu wenig aus. Habe auch auf die Schnelle nichts dazu gefunden, wie man einen einen unterirdischen Bach offiziell mapped.
TrickyFoxy (2024-06-12 09:06:31+00:00): 👋 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1291552410
Chota = -
El=Angel
What did you mean by that?
mavl (2024-06-13 16:04:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
mavl (2024-06-13 16:04:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
CurlingMan13 (2024-06-11 21:44:30+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#:~:text=Wrapping%20polygon%20areas%20around%20a%20hole%20and%20leaving%20a%20tiny%20open%20gap.%20Use%20multipolygons%20instead.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152560254
mavl (2024-06-13 16:04:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
aseidel (2024-06-18 12:31:50+00:00): Hallo wqueck,
ich habe gerade gesehen, dass Du zwischen Römstedt und Himbergen und zwischen Schwemlitz und Hohenzethen an mehreren Wegen ein traffic_sign=DE:230 getaggt hast. Ich bin dort öfter vorbei gekommen (allerdings nicht mehr in den letzten Monaten, ich kann mich also irren!). M. E. sind das alles benutzungspflichtige gemeinsame Geh- und Radwege (hw=path, traffic_sign=DE:240). Bist Du sicher, dass dort eine Ladezone (DE:230) ausgeschildert ist? Falls ich falsch liege, bitte einfach ignorieren. :-)
Danke fürs Checken!
Lieben Gruß
Antje
wqueck (2024-06-18 12:51:45+00:00): Hallo Antje, es war ein Tipp- und Kopierfehler von mir. Natürlich ist traffic_sign=DE:240 richtig. Habe es soeben korrigiert. Danke für den Hinweis.
aseidel (2024-06-18 12:58:45+00:00): Klasse, danke Dir! :-)
osm-user12 (2024-08-29 08:57:57+00:00): Hallo, ich habe zu dem Changeset Fragen:
1. Was bedeutet  access=no und bicycle=yes? Ist für mich ein Widerspruch. Das Gebiet ist zwar ein NSG. In NSG gilt jedoch Wegegebot und nicht -Verbot.
2. Was bedeutet ford=yes auf den highways getaggt? Was habe ich mir darunter vorzustellen?
3. Was ist mit den ways passiert, die vor Deiner Anlage existierten? Die Historie der ways ist nun komplett vernichtet. Das ist sehr schade, da man die Entwicklung des Ganzen nun nicht mehr nachvollziehen kann.
Gruß
mavl (2024-06-13 16:04:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
mavl (2024-06-13 16:03:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
mavl (2024-06-13 16:04:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
literan (2024-06-12 13:05:51+00:00): кривой формат адрески

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%90%D0%B4%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%B0#%D0%9D%D1%83%D0%BC%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%B2
mavl (2024-06-13 16:04:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
mavl (2024-06-13 16:03:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
CurlingMan13 (2024-06-11 21:42:32+00:00): Do not "lollipop" features to try and create a hole for your golf game.

C/S fixed.
CurlingMan13 (2024-06-11 21:44:01+00:00): Please review:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#:~:text=Wrapping%20polygon%20areas%20around%20a%20hole%20and%20leaving%20a%20tiny%20open%20gap.%20Use%20multipolygons%20instead.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152560776
mavl (2024-06-13 16:05:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
mavl (2024-06-13 16:05:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
George Sears (2024-06-12 08:36:52+00:00): Visto che "Piazza Vittorio Emanuele" è il nome riportato sui cartelli (anche se i cartelli non sempre riportano le informazioni "giuste", ma quello è un altro discorso) penso sia più appropriato metterlo su name così è il primo nome visible sulla mappa, poi Piazza Catuma si può mettere in loc_name che sarebbe il nome usato localmente (oppure old_name?), così comunque ti porta qui quando lo cerchi
George Sears (2024-06-12 08:40:37+00:00): È lo stesso caso di Piazza Aldo Moro (Piazza Roma) e Piazza Giuseppe Divittorio (Largo San Nicola) a Barletta
mavl (2024-06-13 16:05:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
mavl (2024-06-13 16:04:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
mavl (2024-06-13 16:03:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
mavl (2024-06-13 16:04:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
mavl (2024-06-13 16:04:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
flohoff (2024-06-12 08:54:54+00:00): Hi,
so als Hallo und als positives Feedback:

Das routing ist sauber zurück geschwenkt auf die Holperdorper Straße

Grün Neu - Rot alt.

https://osm.zz.de/routeqa/?rid=621842,783394

Flo
mavl (2024-06-13 16:04:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
pyrog (2025-08-05 05:56:36+00:00): Le vandalisme dans OSM n'est pas acceptable.

Le poteau incendie a été modifié en transformateur électrique.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1727036595/history

La taille du changesets n'est pas adaptée.
Il faut faire des modifications plus localisées (une pour Lyon, une pour Strasbourg)…
mavl (2024-06-13 16:03:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
mavl (2024-06-13 16:03:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152640781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, ignoring OSM Wiki, ignoring changeset discussion comments].
Spiekerooger (2024-06-11 20:52:21+00:00): I did delete a lot of name:xx tags that have misrepresented Orlando as Florida. Please check your language to see if the name in your language translates to Orlando or Orlando, Florida (both fine) or Florida (wrong).
literan (2024-06-12 13:05:20+00:00): кривой формат адрески

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%90%D0%B4%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%B0#%D0%9D%D1%83%D0%BC%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%B2