piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Glassman (2024-12-09 18:24:54+00:00): #TIP: OSM considers driveway private by the nature of their use so we don't tag it as private unless there is a non-trespassing sign or gate.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160069209
5m4u9 (2024-12-09 03:45:11+00:00): Hola bienvenid@!

Algunas sugerencias cuando edites las rutas:

* Las paradas deben tener las etiquetas public_transport=platform y highway=bus_stop

* El nombre de las paradas inicial y final sugiero que sea "Parada 25" y quitar lo de línea, en general cuando dices a otra persona sobre la parada, dices "esa es la Parada del 25 o Parada del E", a no ser que en Sucre digan completo 👀

* en el nombre de la ruta por ejemplo 25, el formato es: "Bus #: Parada Inicial → Parada Final", vos pusiste Línea 25, no está del todo bien.

* el nombre del operador en lo posible escrito en español... "Sindicato de Micros San Cristóbal"

* hay otras etiquetas que sugiero añadir, pero con las que pusieron es lo básico...

gracias por mejorar el mapa!
rskedgell (2024-12-09 09:51:35+00:00): (Review requested)

That looks fine, thanks.
felipeeugenio (2024-12-08 23:49:20+00:00): Hola.
Cuál es la idea de borrar todo los árboles?
no existen?
felipeeugenio (2024-12-09 12:57:17+00:00): Se reversa edición sin justificación.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160070664
habi (2024-12-09 21:29:09+00:00): Ciao Tinu

Ich bin hier da `review_requested=yes`-
Du schreibst,  dass du die Reihenfolge der Haltestellen angepasst hast.
Wenn ich aber deine Änderung anschaue, dann hast du "nur" drei neue, leere Knoten eingefügt: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=160070849
Was ist genau dein Ziel?

Ä Gruess usem Liebifäud,
Habi
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2024-12-08 22:03:38+00:00): I don't think OSM carto cares about layers unless it's roads. I think it has internal layers by which drawing order is determined and if they are on the same layer, smaller things are drawn on top of bigger. Seems that it's not the case here.

You could use multipolygon to carve out that flowerbed from the pedestrian area. 
1) Make a multipolygon for pedestrian area, with outer role
2) Move pedestrian area tags to multipolygon
3) add flowerbed as inner part of the multipolygon

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon

This will make a hole in the pedestrian area, flower bed will be seen through it.
adrienandrem (2024-12-14 18:04:18+00:00): Hi, you added a duplicate PoI. This bar was already added some days before (https://osm.org/node/12388406804).
Please remove the added duplicate. Thanks
cyton (2025-11-06 18:02:50+00:00): Ist das no-u-turn hier notwendig?
Ist nicht falsch, aber ich frag mich, warum hinzufügen?

Alternativ, mit nur einer relation das gleiche abbilden, nämlich nur rechts abbiegen vom parkplatz aus erlaubt. Fänd ich logisch gesehen besser, da es weniger relarionen sind, die das gleiche abbilden.
Hollul (2025-11-06 21:21:54+00:00): Hi cyton.  
Ich wollte hier grundsätzlich anpassen, dass man vom Parkplatz aus nicht links abbiegen kann. Dann habe ich dort alles so eingestellt, wie es erlaubt ist - daher auch das no-u-turn an dieser Stelle.

Vermutlich wird hier aber sowieso niemand einen U-Turn machen, von daher würde wahrscheinlich das nur rechts Abbiegen auch reichen.
woodpeck (2024-12-08 23:54:44+00:00): Dear Joseph, are you aware that a couple of the ways you have deleted here were subject to an edit war, where a land owner has created a number of "sock puppet" accounts to push through their views (see e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/20497218/history)? Do you have actual first hand knowledge that these ways do not exist, or have you been misled by the same person who unsuccessfully tried to remove these ways themselves?
Joseph R P (2024-12-09 00:22:07+00:00): I was not aware that these ways were subject to an edit war, but I do know a discussion about them had happened: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159812862

It's apparent to me that these roads do not exist. Without the context of them being subject to an edit war, I zoomed in with various aerial imagery and found no evidence that they still existed or existed at all. I then checked Bing Streetside at what would be the intersection of these roads and Jackson Trail East with nothing there either. I am nearly certain that these were just erroneously traced by TIGER, as usual and I have deleted hundreds of roads like these in the past. Around Virginia especially, it's not hard to find residential, service, and track roads traced over farmland or forest without any sight of them actually existing.

There was only one way that I could confirm existed, which was this driveway: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1341100200#map=17/38.260891/-77.635896
woodpeck (2024-12-09 09:22:41+00:00): Personally I would not dare to remove a highway=footway under dense tree cover just because I cannot see it on aerial imagery (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/20497218). Also, in their missives to DWG/OSMF the land owner has not claimed that these paths do not exist - just that they were on private property. But if you have used the same reasoning here as in other parts of Virgina and it has worked well then I'll trust your judgement.
AurélienQ (2025-03-31 18:00:17+00:00): On parle de ça sur le forum, si tu veux participer :
https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/voies-vertes-sur-anciennes-routes-communales-ou-departementales/32710
josmougn (2025-04-01 21:20:15+00:00): Merci pour l'info. J'avoue que je ne participe pas au forum, ce pourrait être l'occasion sur un sujet qui me tient à cœur (en résumé, la valeur "path" a été un mauvais choix pour décrire une voie verte, encore plus s'agissant d'une route départementale).
aceman444 (2025-02-05 22:45:30+00:00): Hi, what do you think cycleway=link means? Your usage here does not seem to match the description at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway .
Rimplot (2025-07-02 20:23:06+00:00): Thank you for the notice, I have corrected them.
aceman444 (2025-07-03 18:17:22+00:00): Thanks, but if you mapped the cycleways as separate ways, they are not cycleway=lane. If they were lanes on the main road (without physical separation to the lanes for cars), they should not have been mapped as separate OSM ways.
Rimplot (2025-07-06 12:29:42+00:00): Updated accordingly, thanks.
Freek_ (2024-12-08 23:06:36+00:00): Nog niet helemaal af. Binnenkort nog even langs voor wat extra foto's. En na BGT inmeting nog even nalopen.
nevw (2024-12-09 03:27:48+00:00): Hi, Squires Loft is placed in the water  - can you relocate it over the building it operates from.
nevw (2024-12-09 03:30:49+00:00): The red dot shows where it was located
https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=160072977
nevw (2024-12-11 07:45:26+00:00): no response, business shifted to previous position.
SomeoneElse (2024-12-08 23:09:41+00:00): It is still listed at https://www.londis.co.uk/our-stores/strensall-service-station , but that might just be a  matter of time.
joost schouppe (2025-01-06 14:52:39+00:00): Please be more careful. You deleted the emergency ward entrance here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12213986204
joost schouppe (2025-01-06 14:53:52+00:00): Oh sorry, nevermind, you added it again as a new node
emersonveenstra (2024-12-14 02:11:33+00:00): Hi there,

You created a way with no tags here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1341112663 could you please go back and tag it? Thanks!
BenCampbellMT (2024-12-14 21:33:45+00:00): Yep!

It was a fragment left underneath that I should have deleted. It is gone now. 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160292489
Pontius (2024-12-09 05:14:34+00:00): Should these be mapped as golf cart paths rather than service roads?
crankynetman (2024-12-10 15:34:54+00:00): That's a great question, I'm not sure!
muskratmike (2024-12-09 00:05:04+00:00): Supplemental comments: deleted non-existent building '444R'. Large glacial erratic rock visible in images is not building LOL.
AndyB_66 (2024-12-18 13:59:15+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
i2004 (2024-12-09 14:11:01+00:00): te hice cambios en la 168 que ahora no va mas por centenario
AgusQui (2024-12-09 19:49:44+00:00): Ehm ¿a partir de cuando? Vi pasar uno hoy a la altura de la municipalidad...
i2004 (2024-12-09 20:06:49+00:00): el 7 de noviembre
Kovoschiz (2024-12-09 09:15:16+00:00): You misunderstood this one. It's being reconstructed. It has temporary offices.
Kovoschiz (2024-12-09 09:16:25+00:00): It was moved away for some unknown reason only. I don't know why.
ubahnverleih (2024-12-09 10:27:26+00:00): OK, so i should restore the bus_station and integrate it into the stop_area relation?
ubahnverleih (2024-12-09 15:36:35+00:00): Ah, you have already done it, thank you!
Hufkratzer (2024-12-09 21:00:06+00:00): Hi,
bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1341137134 wieder das gleiche Problem wie schon in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156888431 besprochen.

Beispiel für eine Reitanlage:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/192293522
Bastianowitz (2024-12-09 21:42:55+00:00): Ja guten Abend, ich bin echt baff! 
Kaum habe ich vor ca einem Tag leider wieder diesen Fehler wegen meines "Schweizer Käse Hirn" gemacht, werde ich durch "SIE" sofort zurecht gewiesen xd. Danke!
Aber ich bin beeindruckt!
Hufkratzer (2024-12-10 19:37:08+00:00): Zu viel des Lobes. Das ist ein stupider, langweiliger Job, diese Kommentare zu schreiben.
diamondarmorsteve (2025-01-08 17:09:52+00:00): In the US, we do not tag places based on their legal classification. Rather, we consider the place's importance within the local and regional area. (If we did tag based on legal classification, nearly every place in Kansas would be a place=city, which is incorrect.)
Poi1976 (2025-01-08 22:37:21+00:00): Ah! Thanks for the explanation!
literan (2024-12-09 17:03:52+00:00): OSM не предназначен для хранения исторической информации. Откачу. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_map_historic_events_and_historic_features
literan (2024-12-09 17:04:58+00:00): также, вы вносите правки без каких-либо комментариев к ним. Это противоречит рекомендациям и затрудняет работу с правками. Настоятельно прошу вносить осмысленные комментарии к правкам.
Дымков Артём Денисович (2024-12-10 19:31:39+00:00): Насчёт комментариев понятно. Но тогда зачем в вики присутствует тег railway=razed?
literan (2024-12-11 06:46:58+00:00): потому что любой может править вики... Там прямо в статье написано, что применение этого тега противоречит тому-то и оспаривается участниками. Все же, с одной стороны просто тег, а с другой - одно из базовых правил, принципов.
dpolovinkin (2025-05-13 10:36:17+00:00): довольно забавно что в один момент в вики OSM в статье про правильные комменты была строчка "В целом можно посмотреть как пишет комментарии этот картограф" - и переводило на ваш профиль, где теперь вы оставляете (no comment) XDD
NeisBot (2024-12-09 01:48:37+00:00): Hi CrashNebula240, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 98% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 40 building(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=160075376
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-12-09 02:46:08+00:00): Please don't delete features.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160075376
CrashNebula240 (2024-12-09 03:31:29+00:00): They are intentional, I live here hence I can confirm these are residential buildings as oposed to medical buildings
pitscheplatsch (2024-12-09 05:04:56+00:00): Thanks for your reply CrashNebula240!

Your changeset has been reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160076139

If they are residential buildings and not all hospitals, we will have to correct something again.
felipeeugenio (2024-12-09 12:33:31+00:00): building=hospital corregido a house.
Por favor no borrar cosas que se pueden corregir.
saludos
pitscheplatsch (2024-12-09 13:36:02+00:00): @ felipeeugenio ¡gracias!
felipeeugenio (2024-12-09 12:32:16+00:00): Playa convertida a landuse residencial corregido
VLD062 (2025-05-01 18:35:52+00:00): Hi,

Hello! I noticed that you've used tactile_paving=yes on ways, and I wanted to point out that this might not be the best approach in certain situations. Specifically, for pedestrian crossings, tactile paving should only be applied to the way if it is used in a line across the entire crossing. If tactile paving is only present at the two spots where the footway ends, it should not be tagged on the way itself. For more details, you can refer to the OpenStreetMap guidelines on tactile paving https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tactile_paving#Use_on_nodes. Thank you for your contributions!
NhacaiSuncity (2024-12-09 02:31:37+00:00): https://suncity.energy/
adianto (2024-12-11 18:47:13+00:00): Halo ichsansy901, terima kasih sudah ikut berkontribusi di OpenStreetMap.

Sepertinya Anda baru-baru ini menambahkan struktur tunnel pada beberapa ruas jalan di bawah jembatan, serta sungai (Kali Bekasi).

Mohon maaf hal ini kurang tepat karena tag tunnel hanya digunakan pada jalan yang memang dibangun dalam bentuk terowongan atau underpass.

Lebih-lebih tidak tepat digunakan pada sungai yang terbentuk secara alami seperti Kali Bekasi, kecuali memang aliran sungai benar-benar dibentuk terowongan.

Mohon dibantu untuk dikembalikan lagi seperti semula (dihapus tag tunnel nya).
Terima kasih
NieWnen (2024-12-17 20:05:11+00:00): Cześć,
jak rysujesz cieki wodne i inne ścieżki, proszę postaraj się uważać, aby nie nakładać na siebie linii.
Res Saca (2025-08-18 20:06:27+00:00): Dziękuję za informację. Postaram się. :-)
skorasaurus (2024-12-21 20:38:55+00:00): thanks for the updates; you beat me to it :)
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-12-12 11:40:23+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11303512448/history 

is it shop operated by a company and generally accessible? In such case - what they are selling?

Or is it a company office? In such case it really should be office=company - not shop=company
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-05 15:17:21+00:00): tried PM, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/messages/1236462
udonf (2025-03-08 07:39:58+00:00): fixed, thank you for reviewing edits
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-08 08:38:19+00:00): thanks for a fix!
FenyMufyd (2025-03-14 15:59:38+00:00): OpenStreetMap is not a property registry; thus, do not map individual ownership of buildings or plots; OpenStreetMap bukanlah database sertifikat tanah atau plot tanah kepemilikan, Silakan baca https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Parcel

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163616061
Croissant98520 (2026-01-02 18:21:10+00:00): i believe this construction project was completed in 2025. I haven't seen any work under way in some time.  I updated the sidewalk and traffic routing aroound the now-closed Aberdeen Ave.
Sébastien Pi (2026-01-03 18:57:37+00:00): En lisant le document, j’ai remarqué ce bout de chemin cyclable sur CyclOSM. Tu as vu où une rampe :p ?

Tu voulais peut-être dire qu’on peut passer à côté à vélo en marchant ?
BardafFr (2026-01-03 21:37:57+00:00): Il y a une glissière pour permettre de monter ou descendre son vélo plus facilement. Je l'ai fait avec StreetComplete, qui pose des question précises sur les aménagement pour les traduire en attributs
Sébastien Pi (2026-01-03 21:45:51+00:00): On parle bien de cet escalier : https://api.panoramax.xyz/?focus=pic&map=21.1/50.6069893/2.9815476&pic=17fda13c-a758-41ce-95dc-6f00d427e970&speed=250&theme=default&xyz=157.45/0.25/56 ?
Je n’ai jamais vu de glissière dessus. En tous cas, y en avait pas il y a 1 an.
BardafFr (2026-01-03 21:49:33+00:00): Sis i, il y a un coté qui a un replat sur le bord pour une rue de vélo, (coté droit en montant il me semble), mais je reverifierais
Sébastien Pi (2026-01-03 21:55:52+00:00): « rue de vélo », tu penses trop à tes vélos-rues électorales^^·

Personnellement, je n’en ai aucun souvenir. J’ai encore monté les marches (à pied) mercredi. Ça m’a jamais frappé. Sûr que j’y penserai la prochaine fois aussi !
Le côté droit est légèrement caché, mais il semble symétrique à celui gauche.
BardafFr (2026-01-03 22:08:06+00:00): Trop curieux, je suis aller voir sur la cartographie interdite :P
Il y a une vue au pied de l'escalier, on vois que la rembarre de droite est légèrement décalé et un plat en métal installé. On ne vois pas bien le coté gauche mais de mémoire il n'existe pas sur le coté gauche, ce qui m'a amené a mettre cette signalisation en me disant que c'était voulu :)
Sébastien Pi (2026-01-03 22:15:56+00:00): Ah ouais, c’est discret comme système !
Google a osé faire un œuf de Paques là-dessus. Faudra que je l’ajoute dans le Wiki pour que les contributeurs ne se fassent pas avoir comme toi : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Copyright_Easter_Eggs

:D

Bon plus sérieusement vu comme l’escalier est raide. Ça doit marcher en montant. Mais la descente, je ne testerais pas !
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-04 06:14:48+00:00): Removed SEO spam from name=* for Jared Spingarn laywer POI in changeset 183625796

https://osm.org/changeset/183625796
The Equalizer (2025-01-25 23:55:42+00:00): Reverting as the edit labelled the admin boundary as a bus route

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161765115
mavl (2025-05-13 15:03:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
mavl (2025-05-13 15:07:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
canfe (2025-07-26 17:52:20+00:00): Non fondere l'indirizzo con il locale.
L'indirizzo mettilo "dove c'è la buca delle lettere"
Il locale nel punto principale dove esiste.
Così sfrutti l'iconcina se esiste per quel tipo di servizio.
Paolitosss (2025-08-01 19:24:09+00:00): Quindi è corretto che il poi sia senza indirizzo?
Paolitosss (2025-08-03 19:40:26+00:00): Grazie! Me lo studio!
mavl (2025-05-13 15:07:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
nhacainohu90 (2024-12-09 06:53:51+00:00): https://nohu90.co.com/
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1Pb6hvFMsK3MPFN4l-D47kfAcdCRFIR7c
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1LtTdeRykbbLRM0n4ZKSH1vm9l4esNB7Vaamx4e_dUfs/edit?usp=drivesdk
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1VbwVpWHnoGBA_qAHhCr70L72ipI2Z-bh
https://sites.google.com/view/nhacainohu90/home
https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer?mid=1xVX3JN7GVF4uNwCgCLpntovnRgxElBw
https://nhacainohu90.blogspot.com/2024/12/nohu90.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YtKfgVtoicA
https://x.com/nhacainohu90/status/1865997927744729503
https://creators.spotify.com/pod/show/nh-ci-nohu90/episodes/Hng-Dn-ng-K-Ti-Khon-Nohu90-Nhanh-Chng-e2s2u8e/a-abm1q09
https://www.scoop.it/topic/nha-cai-nohu90/p/4162821232/2024/12/09/nohu90-thien-uong-ca-cuoc-danh-cho-nguoi-choi-viet-nam
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-12-10 02:12:47+00:00): reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160112761
mavl (2025-05-13 15:03:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
canfe (2025-07-26 18:03:03+00:00): Orario incompatibile
Paolitosss (2025-08-01 19:22:18+00:00): Ho rimesso l'orario corretto, era corretto, solo un errore di sintassi, ora dovrebbe essere ok
ivanbranco (2025-04-03 19:53:25+00:00): Cosa sono "Palmento" e "strada di pietra" (questo dovrebbe avere la maiuscola)? tourism=attraction é un tag molto generico e non aiutano a capire di cosa si tratta.
Elapsus (2025-04-04 08:21:31+00:00): Sono resti archeologici della zona di epoca greca o forse posteriore
MaciekMma (2024-12-09 11:52:07+00:00): Ta czesc "Altyleryjskiej" nie zostala jeszcze otwarta. Artykul, ktory podales mowi o otwarciu dojazdu do ronda od strony północnej. Część, którątutaj otworzyłeś jest nadal nieprzejezdna.
MaciekMma (2024-12-09 11:53:57+00:00): Otwarcia tego brakujacego odcinka na pewno nie przegapisz, bedzie o tym glosno w lokalnej prasie :)  Prezydent miasta na pewno uzyje tego jako narzedzia propagandowego, wszak budowa mostu byla jednym z postulatow wyborczych.
MaciekMma (2024-12-09 11:56:16+00:00): Dodam jeszcze, ze ta nowa ulica z mostem najprawdopodobniej nie bedzie sie nazywala Artyleryjska, ale zupelnie inaczej.
Sebastian | Yanosik (2024-12-09 11:56:21+00:00): Biedronka na zdjęciu mnie zmyliła, wycofuję zmiany. Dzięki za czunjość!
mavl (2025-05-13 15:07:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
eggie (2024-12-09 08:53:01+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback    Het is niet duidelijk wat je bedoeling was gezien je commentaar. 
Je hebt de place node aangepast naar place=yes? Waarom? 
Ga er vanuit dat veel al correct is in OSM.
Ik heb deze changeset teruggedraaid. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-12-09 09:02:31+00:00): Reverted by changeset #160082832
Glassman (2024-12-09 18:38:52+00:00): The building should match the roof line of the actual building. Can you fix it? Also, besides the name Roche Harbor Marine, can you add a tag as to what type of business it is? First guess it is something in the craft key or a shop. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:craft  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dboat
Glassman (2024-12-09 18:39:01+00:00): The building should match the roof line of the actual building. Can you fix it? Also, besides the name Roche Harbor Marine, can you add a tag as to what type of business it is? First guess it is something in the craft key or a shop. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:craft  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dboat
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160081331
Glassman (2024-12-09 18:39:03+00:00): The building should match the roof line of the actual building. Can you fix it? Also, besides the name Roche Harbor Marine, can you add a tag as to what type of business it is? First guess it is something in the craft key or a shop. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:craft  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dboat
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160081331
Glassman (2024-12-09 18:39:09+00:00): The building should match the roof line of the actual building. Can you fix it? Also, besides the name Roche Harbor Marine, can you add a tag as to what type of business it is? First guess it is something in the craft key or a shop. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:craft  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dboat
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160081331