piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
gaborhojtsy (2026-01-07 09:50:57+00:00): Ez valóban butaság volt, az épületek megvannak, csak a funkcióik szűntek meg. A Piarista iskola megszűnt, Csak a "Régi épület", "Parti épület" és a pálya került a Huzella iskola használatába. A többi épületből csak az "új épület"-ben vannak a Növényi sportakadémia edzései, más felhasználásról nem tudok. 

Reverteltem.
gaborhojtsy (2026-01-07 10:02:24+00:00): Küldtem be egy új szerkesztést, ami már korrektebb remélem :) https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176936856
eggie (2026-01-06 20:36:12+00:00): Dag juni..
Volgens gebruiken we in OSM ALDI met hoofdletters.

Mvg
eggie
eggie (2026-01-06 21:04:53+00:00): Naam weer aangepast
maro21 (2026-01-07 17:58:26+00:00): Na OpenStreetMap w tagu [name] wpisujemy tylko nazwę własną. Pozostałe informacje są zawarte w odpowiednich tagach, w tym przypadku o tym że to studio fotograficzne mówi tag craft = photographer, a że jest we Wrocławiu tag [addr:city = Wrocław]. Na stronie internetowej nigdzie nie pojawia się "Flame studio fotograficzne Wrocław", więc nie jest to nazwa własna.
NeisBot (2026-01-07 06:44:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13278463402 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Auto repair shop in Muscatine IA"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-17 17:00:05+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177344149
Arturo Francisco Barbero (2026-01-14 19:58:04+00:00): Hola Martín,

He revertido tu edición porque se eliminaron varios edificios que habían sido demolidos y que por ello habías eliminado.
En OpenStreetMap, cuando un edificio ha sido derribado y, como en el caso, entraña cierto valor histórico o etiquetado de Wikidata (Wikipedia), no se borra, sino que se mantiene el contorno y se etiqueta como demolido (usando demolished:building=*).

Esto es importante porque:

Mantiene el historial del objeto.

Evita que otros mapeadores lo vuelvan a dibujar.

Refleja mejor la realidad sobre el terreno.

Por ese motivo he recuperado los edificios y los he etiquetado correctamente como demolidos.

Si tienes dudas sobre cómo hacerlo o quieres comentarlo, no dudes en escribirme. Todos hemos empezado alguna vez, me alegra mucho ver nuevos mapeadores por Segovia.

Un saludo, Arturo.
gigi2037 (2026-01-16 14:02:32+00:00): Ciao per la variante dovrestti fare un altra relazione osm Inspector mi da questo errore error 	unknown role 'variante'
Thomaso58 (2026-01-16 16:17:51+00:00): Era un errore di battitura. È stata usata la parola tedesca "variante" al posto di "variant".

Corretto.

Non credo che creerà percorsi aggiuntivi.

Ora so dell'ispettore OSM, grazie.

Lo proverò con LoMaps e i trasporti pubblici per vedere se funzionano con l'implementazione corretta.

Cordiali saluti, Thomas

This is produced by the Google Translator
eggie (2026-01-07 10:08:00+00:00): Hoi Je vraagt feedback... Lijkt me prima zo.
MVG
eggie
Cindayra (2026-01-07 19:51:32+00:00): Hi Eggie, I'm still new to OSM contribution (and Dutch) and just looking to see if I've understood this correctly before I push a change to the map. Thank you for verifying this for me ,...,
Groetjes, Cindayra
eggie (2026-01-06 21:09:20+00:00): review_requested 	yes

Ziet er netjes uit.
Gr eggie
Tatfahren (2026-01-07 08:26:09+00:00): Das wurde 2 Stunden später sozusagen wieder zurückgesetzt. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176921306
Tatfahren (2026-01-07 08:28:26+00:00): Bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176808791 hat es auch schonmal jemand korrigiert, und in den changesets haben mehrere bereits auf die Fehler hingewiesen.
NeisBot (2026-01-07 06:44:46+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/1046694026 v4

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Car dealer in Muncie"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-17 17:00:06+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177344151
trigpoint (2026-01-11 18:39:14+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/177102231
eerib (2026-01-07 00:51:55+00:00): Hello Beeeom,

The tag leisure=nature_reserve is for nature reserve boundaries, not for trails. I have replaced this tag with the tags:

ownership=public
operator=BC Parks

and

ownership=private
operator=Anderson Creek Timber Company Ltd

You can find out more information about the OpenStreetMap standards on the OpenStreetMap wiki.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dnature_reserve

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ownership

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:operator

If there are ever any questions regarding the standards then you could open a discussion topic on the OpenStreetMap Community Forum

https://community.openstreetmap.org/

Thank you, eerib
eggie (2026-01-06 21:00:59+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback Je info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode. In OSM svp geen spaties in postcode.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-09 05:33:12+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13062337155
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1464912522

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
djsa (2026-01-07 09:10:44+00:00): Please don't remove paths. This could have been changed by setting the access to private. I'm reverting the changeset, and marking the road as private.
Rainero (2026-03-23 20:03:38+00:00): Revert mit changeset/180323188
(unzulässige Quelle)
Fizzie-DWG (2026-01-25 03:16:06+00:00): DWG revert - apparent undiscussed import

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177667698
Marvk (2026-01-11 19:18:14+00:00): Hallo Marcus,

zu dieser area passt eher parking=street_side, nicht parking=surface. Habe es bereits angepasst.

parking=surface ist eher für größere, dedizierte Parkplätze, während parking=street_side für Parkplätze oder Parkplatzreihen an Straßen gedacht ist.

Hier gibt es noch ein paar mehr Infos:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:parking%3Dstreet_side

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:parking=surface

Beste Grüße und schönen Abend :-)
NeisBot (2026-01-07 06:44:51+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13435779145 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Pet store with self-service wash in Charlottesville"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-17 17:00:07+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177344152
(Deleted leftovers after several edits)
Wulf4096 (2026-01-11 12:09:05+00:00): Moin,
unter welcher Lizenz steht das "ALIKS"? Dürfen wir das für OpenStreetMap nutzen?

Auf https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Permissions gibt es was aus "Pinneberg" (auch Schleswig-Holstein) wonach wir es *nicht* nutzen dürfen.
trigpoint (2026-01-11 18:39:11+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/177102231
Kamil Kalata (2026-01-06 21:42:01+00:00): Ortofotomapy czasowe użyte w tym zestawie zmian składały się ze zdjęć wykonanych w dniach 13 września 2023 roku oraz 21 czerwca 2024 roku.
voltairovicz (2026-01-07 08:38:16+00:00): Hej. Nie ma potrzeby, żebyś pod każdym changesetem pisał o tym, kiedy były wykonane zdjęcia lotnicze ;) Nie jest to konieczna uwaga. Ale też brawa za ładne nazwy changesetów
Kamil Kalata (2026-01-07 10:09:36+00:00): Cześć, voltairovicz!
Uważam, że informacja o czasie wykonania zdjęć jest o tyle konieczna, gdyż z opisu "Ortofotomapa czasowa" nie wynika, jak bardzo jest ona aktualna, w przeciwieństwie do samego "Ortofotomapa", z którego można wywnioskować, że korzystałem z najbardziej aktualnych zdjęć.
Poza tym dziękuję za pochwałę moich opisów zmian. Staram się, by były jak najbardziej precyzyjne, by wyłącznie na ich podstawie być w stanie wywnioskować, co i gdzie zmieniałem.
A67-A67 (2026-01-08 13:00:22+00:00): In deze wijziging gebeuren vreemde dingen.

Ten eerste wordt de naam Meppel uit namen verwijderd, ook waar deze wel hoort. Slijpservice Meppel wordt Slijpservice, Brandweer Meppel wordt Brandweer, Fysiotherapie Meppel wordt Fysiotherapie. 

Daarnaast maak je wel 40 nieuwe versies aan van POI's zonder iets te veranderen, bijvoorbeeld hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2732697888/history
Jelv (2026-01-10 14:41:50+00:00): Dankjewel, heb je andere bericht ook gelezen en naam aanpassing is nu duidelijker. 
Voor Ik heb een hele batch achter elkaar aangepast, wellicht dat CoMaps daar een bug in heeft. Ik zal voorlopig niks editen via CoMaps, dank voor je bericht.
Fizzie-DWG (2026-01-25 03:36:01+00:00): DWG revert - apparent undiscussed import

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177667924
rempshaener (2026-01-08 18:03:02+00:00): Hallo,

du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Die Ergänzung von amenity=fire_station an einem einzelnen Gebäude ist insofern unglücklich, als dies bereits richtigerweise am Geländeumriss erfasst wurde.
Damit bist du bei diesem Feuerwehrhaus aber nicht der erste, dort passt insgesamt einiges nicht mehr zusammen.
Was ist jetzt zu tun?
Bei www.openstreetmap.org/way/1430699504 müsste das amenity=fire_station runter.
Bei www.openstreetmap.org/way/443366709 muss alles bis building=fire_station runter und auf www.openstreetmap.org/way/1324153983.

Bei Fragen bitte melden.
Viele Grüße
BC168 (2026-01-07 12:02:37+00:00): Hallo,

website:menu soll einen Link zur _offiziellen_ Speisekarte angeben.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:website:menu?uselang=de

Restaurant Guru ist nur ein Portal mit Gästebewertungen. Da kann jeder irgendwas eintragen oder hochladen, und die Einträge sind oft veraltet. Eine offizielle Seite scheint es nicht (mehr) zu geben.
trigpoint (2026-01-11 17:38:11+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/177102231
trigpoint (2026-01-11 18:37:28+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/177102231
eggie (2026-01-07 10:06:52+00:00): Dag Wesley  Je vraagt feedback . Lijkt me oke.
gr eggie
NeisBot (2026-01-07 06:44:53+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13436362726 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Electronics and furniture store Apple Authorized Service Provider location"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-17 17:00:08+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177344153
trigpoint (2026-01-11 17:37:43+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/177102231
trigpoint (2026-01-11 18:36:56+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/177102231
NeisBot (2026-01-07 06:43:27+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 37 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1464890412 v2 | 10 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1464890419 v2 | 9 crossings
https://osm.org/way/513870359 v37 | 4 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/13436068716 v2
https://osm.org/node/12198115782 v2
https://osm.org/node/6867140711 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=176921427
Sanniu (2026-01-08 06:33:10+00:00): Hi something is wrong here.
E.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1460218764 marked as opened, but it is inaccessible as nearby segments are in construction.
Can you mark all segments right?
NeisBot (2026-01-07 06:44:54+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13421492229 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Gun shop in Dickeyville WI"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-17 17:05:27+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177344332
mbr-g (2026-01-06 22:30:17+00:00): Ändrade fel busslinje och vet inte om eller hur man kan göra en "rollback" så kommer rerouta tillbaka den till rätt position
NeisBot (2026-01-07 06:46:29+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13418552956 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Restaurant equipment store in Festus MO"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-17 17:05:28+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177344334
Tjuro (2026-01-20 11:32:03+00:00): Beste R_S,

Gelieve niet zomaar nieuwe historic=monument toe te voegen.

Voor meer info over het vershil tussen historic=monument en historic=memorial zie:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dmonument

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dmemorial

Met vriendelijke groet,

Tjuro
NeisBot (2026-01-07 06:46:32+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13436062128 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Wine bar and bistro in Elberta"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-17 17:05:34+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177344341
(Deleted leftovers after several edits)
tastrax (2026-01-07 05:50:26+00:00): You might also want to remove the campsite tag further south.
trigpoint (2026-01-11 17:37:38+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/177102231
trigpoint (2026-01-11 18:36:51+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/177102231
jengelh (2026-01-07 08:31:55+00:00): dem User würde ich nicht trauen...
qugeb (2026-01-07 08:37:55+00:00): Hmm, 
ich war eher zurückhaltend bei seinen Notes.
2 geschlossene Notes waren der Art "die Daten sind schon genau so erfasst wie im Hinweis gemeldet"
1x E-Mail-Addresse ergänzt (nachvollziehbar)
1x Brückenoberfläche ist Holz (statt befestigt), das war auch nachvollziehbar.
Lediglich bei dem Hinweis, dass es sich statt einer privaten Einfahrt um einen privaten Fußweg handelt (https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5120068) hatte ich meine Änderung jetzt komplett auf seiner Aussage festgehalten. Wenn du daran Zweifel hast, können wir das aber auch gerne reverten.
jengelh (2026-01-07 18:56:02+00:00): Habe ich reverted. Ich war dort: das ist, wie vor 8 Jahren, immer noch eine Einfahrt. Das sieht man verdammt schon am Luftbild, weil da ein Carport steht.
NeisBot (2026-01-07 06:46:34+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13396140226 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Shoe store in Frederick MD"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-17 17:05:35+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177344342
Kaung Htet Lwin Moe (2026-01-07 08:37:00+00:00): I added the bridge is a great viewpoint as a tourism activity.
Xevi (2026-01-07 09:07:14+00:00): Openstreetmap no usa la  toponímia de Wikipedia en espanyol ja que es erronea
user_5359 (2026-01-07 10:19:34+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/relation/18226035. Why did you delete the role “to”?
woodpeck_repair (2026-01-07 00:09:11+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 170044810, 171602398, 172276462, 172312589, 172314961, 172315289, 172325764, 172376185, 172410629, 172411039, 172411074, 172426258, 172428098, 172428135, 172428154, 172430033, 172525748, 173286249, 173399406, 173399597, 173400387, 173403671, 173404828, 173411512, 173411586, 173469229, 173499103, 173500137, 173500492, 173511669, 173511826, 173512102, 173523531, 173527760, 173528248, 173528372, 173534146, 173545077, 173545522, 173545922, 173546140, 173547240, 173547395, 173547566, 173547757, 173590786, 173591217, 173592028, 173598580, 173598942, 173599147, 173599492, 173599706, 173599881, 173599973, 173646541, 173646901, 173687544, 173687887, 173688495, 173688593, 173688747, 173688865, 173689410, 173689637, 173689843, 173690162, 173690283, 173690397, 173690626, 173692369, 173692413, 173692448, 173746182, 173746211, 173746885, 173747446, 173748537.
Natfoot (2026-03-09 06:06:23+00:00): looks good thanks for the edit
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176923946
Bondi Maps (2026-01-07 01:14:51+00:00): Que modificaste de la 185?
Bondi Maps (2026-01-07 01:17:07+00:00): Y de la 182
Mirko Drensek (2026-01-08 17:05:49+00:00): Agregué paradas y corregí la ruta del 185 que aparecía que llegaba hasta oliden pero en realidad llega a cosquin.

Cambie a blanco el color del 182.
Bondi Maps (2026-01-08 17:09:15+00:00): Con respecto al color de las líneas de Metropol, en el grupo llegamos a un consenso de no usar el blanco y usar el color del logo de la empresa. El blanco se renderiza mal en otras aplicaciones como OSMAnd
Bondi Maps (2026-01-11 15:30:03+00:00): La 182 suspendió los ramales Emaús y Villa Basso, porque los tragiste devuelta?
democat (2026-01-07 09:06:55+00:00): Looks good to me!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176924629
NeisBot (2026-01-07 06:46:36+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/7863625037 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Clothing manufacturer in the USA"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-17 17:05:36+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177344343

Only the affected tags were deleted; other unrelated data was left untouched
NeisBot (2026-01-07 06:46:37+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/7597797049 v4

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "The Evans Group garment manufacturer"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-17 17:05:37+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177344344

Only the affected tags were deleted; other unrelated data was left untouched
felipeeugenio (2026-01-07 12:38:18+00:00): Hola.
una cosa es que un pequeño camino vecinal sea de acceso público, que es lo que conversábamos antes, pero ahora le está sacando el tag de acceso privado a entradas a casas. La wiki no se refiere a eso (usa el operador "or"). 

Por favor ingresar al chat de la comunidad en Telegram (https://t.me/OSMcl). Ahí cientos de maperos resolvemos dudas a quienes comienzan a mapear. Estamos para ayudarlo.

Saludos y nos vemos.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176925494