piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2026-02-16 00:42:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 23 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/504129144 v6 | 11 crossings
https://osm.org/way/310778489 v4 | 10 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/4943310468 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178604859
NeisReview (2026-02-24 05:34:56+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/178660647
NeisBot (2026-02-16 00:51:47+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/12919392897 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Roofing company"

#MapWithoutSpam
scrambling_panda (2026-02-16 17:18:10+00:00): This whole changeset was reverted: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178609337
pitscheplatsch (2026-02-16 18:01:36+00:00): Thanks @scrambling_panda for noticing.
dcskobuffs (2026-02-18 15:46:48+00:00): Hello 5m4u9,

I noticed you reclassified roads in Villazón with the purpose of rerouting heavy traffic. Instead of classifications, how would you feel about using the tags hgv=no on Avenida Antofagasta (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/389636245) in order to retain the trunk classification where it was originally to serve the most general set of drivers? Additionally, a specific route for trucks could be accomplished by tagging all the necessary ways as hgv=designated to represent the alternative route for trucks. This designation route serving trucks would be more consistent with OSM road hierarchy policy set as a secondary road class in my opinion. Please let me know what you think of these suggestions.

Thank you and looking forward to hearing from you,
Dcskobuffs
5m4u9 (2026-02-24 22:16:32+00:00): Hi, you're right, Antofagasta Ave. should be trunk road because it's the most used.

I agree with adding hgv=no to Antofagasta Ave. and hgv=designated for the heavy traffic route (secondary).
dcskobuffs (2026-02-26 15:06:19+00:00): Thanks for the discussion,

I went ahead and reclassified Antofagasta Ave. to trunk and added hgv=no in this changeset(https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178605215), as well as reclassifying the designated truck route to secondary and adding hgv=designated.

Happy Mapping!
Taksine (2026-02-16 04:06:14+00:00): 你好，有人说你画的这几个都是行政村，按照社区共识，行政村一般不应当删除村字，自然村才是另外讨论的范围。
MassCartog (2026-02-16 14:11:57+00:00): Hi skoocooms, Again I see you are still removing features that appear on the ground, they clearly follow visible tracks. Could you respond and explain why you are removing these rather than updating them and tagging them correctly as private?

OSM is a community project, you should be monitoring and responding to these comments.
Sammyhawkrad (2026-02-16 21:38:53+00:00): Hello Greg_Rose, you've added a number of footpaths here with the tag highway=pedestrian. I think highway=footway or highway=path would be more suitable.
Sammyhawkrad (2026-02-16 21:42:30+00:00): I notice that you've also deleted a church; any reason for that?
Sammyhawkrad (2026-02-16 22:05:59+00:00): I'm sorry, but the more I look into this changeset, the more issues I find. Although valuable street names have been added, it will be a pain to nitpick and fix the data damage introduced in this changeset. I believe reversing this changeset would be the best solution.

As a non-local, why do you downgrade suburbs to neighbourhoods? And why do you remove details of the transport network relations?
Greg_Rose (2026-02-16 22:15:14+00:00): You're kinda spamming me with questions so pls be patient as I answer. 
Pedestrian street vs footpath
These are streets with street names that do not allow vehicle traffic, versus simple footpaths. Footpaths often do not get rendered downstream, whereas pedestrian streets do. If the street isn't named, fine. Turn it into a footway.
Greg_Rose (2026-02-16 22:16:20+00:00): Deleted church: Pls identify via node id
Greg_Rose (2026-02-16 22:21:30+00:00): suburbs vs neighborhoods - pls look at the definition for each.
There are suburbs stacked practically on top of each other - suburbs render as towns, whereas neighborhoods do not. A cluster of "suburb" nodes will only render one node in almost ALL downstream clients. 
As an example - La is definitely a suburb, places like Ringway Estates, North Ridge and Asylum Down are NOT.
Enock4seth (2026-02-16 22:26:16+00:00): I see my building:parts deleted :/, @Greg_Rose any clarifications? eg. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/777760306

These are not highway=pedestrian, highway=footway or highway=path are better suited. Please DO NOT tag for the renderer - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer this can be better achieved outside OSM.
Enock4seth (2026-02-16 22:41:19+00:00): Well not my building:parts, but building:parts that look valid for www.openstreetmap.org/way/318654998 were deleted
Enock4seth (2026-02-16 22:46:33+00:00): Kindly revert place=neighbourhood back to place=suburb as these are not neighbourhoods.
Greg_Rose (2026-02-17 00:16:41+00:00): Building=part has to be in a relation for it to be valid. The only parts I deleted were for buildings that were already mapped as building=yes. Some of the stand-alone parts I just retagged as building=yes.
Greg_Rose (2026-02-17 00:19:38+00:00): There is a difference between "mapping for the renderer" and "mapping so it renders". I don't map for a specific downstream client, so I'm not "mapping for the renderer" - I'm just trying to make sure that these areas and districts actually show up! It sounds like you're local and you couldn't care less about them rendering so I'll stop changing them.
Greg_Rose (2026-02-17 00:29:57+00:00): Sorry @Enock4seth didn't notice you had inserted yourself in the convo - thought I was still talking to sammyhawkrad
Greg_Rose (2026-02-17 00:35:21+00:00): @Enock4seth Please specify which places changed to neighborhoods from suburbs are incorrect. The very definition of the suburb tag shows that it was created for rendering. Plopping a new suburb down every 300 meters goes against everything in the definition. While it could be argued that some of these are quarters instead of neighborhoods, that's mostly just semantics.
Sammyhawkrad (2026-02-17 09:37:54+00:00): Once again, my apologies. I had no intention of spamming you; it just turned out I had further concerns after submitting a comment.

|These are streets with street names that do not allow vehicle traffic, versus simple footpaths.|
- The difference between highway=pedestrian vs highway=footway is not about having a name. Footways can also have names. Pedestrian highways are usually large enough for cars but are reserved exclusively for pedestrians and are typically found in city centres. That's why they are rendered as big as highway=residential, if not bigger.   

| Footpaths often do not get rendered downstream |
- Footpaths (highway=footway and highway=path) are rendered.

|Deleted church: Pls identify via node id|
- At first glance, I thought the church was deleted. Now I notice parts of it have been reused elsewhere.

|suburbs vs neighborhoods - pls look at the definition for each|
- If you look around Accra New Town (suburb), you will find the neighbourhoods Akoa Ndor, Kpehe, Aryee Diki. I'm pretty sure we do understand the difference between a suburb and a neighbourhood.

| As an example - La is definitely a suburb, places like Ringway Estates, North Ridge and Asylum Down are NOT. |
- On what basis do you make this claim?

|A cluster of "suburb" nodes will only render one node in almost ALL downstream clients.|
- We are not tagging for the renderer. Just because suburbs are clustered doesn't mean we should demote some of them to neighbourhoods so that they can be "properly" rendered. Within these suburbs, there are neighbourhoods that are yet to be added to the map.

|Building=part has to be in a relation for it to be valid|
- building:part=yes doesn't have to be in a relation to be valid. They are used in Simple 3D Buildings.

| I don't map for a specific downstream client, so I'm not "mapping for the renderer" - I'm just trying to make sure that these areas and districts actually show up!|
- Mapping so that things "show up" is the classic definition of mapping for the renderer.
Greg_Rose (2026-02-18 08:06:44+00:00): Thx for the reply @Sammyhawkrad - I'll answer these tomorrow. Today was a chemotherapy infusion day for me and I'm crashing now (it's midnight here)
Greg_Rose (2026-02-20 21:19:41+00:00): @Sammyhawkrad Reverted a bunch of ped streets to footways in downtown Accra fyi.
Greg_Rose (2026-03-01 05:54:02+00:00): Well it turns out that not only is the usage I knew for place=suburb deprecated, the OSM definition of suburb is completely different from North American english. I changed back almost all of the places I turned into neighborhoods. Sorry about that.
The underlying point that I failed to make previously is that suburb is the highest class of city sub-part. There are no quarters or neighborhoods mapped here, so the result is a flat topography of place names with no variation in size or importance.
Sammyhawkrad (2026-03-01 08:28:35+00:00): I'm glad you realise your mistake now. As I mentioned earlier, there are neighbourhoods within these suburbs that are yet to be mapped. 
A lot of them can be seen as bus stop names. Akin to using street names as bus stop names in other parts of the world, we use neighbourhood names and landmarks in Ghana.
AtlTrailsWMV (2026-02-16 01:35:44+00:00): I have updated the map to reflect new trails I have built over the course of 15+ years.
arjunaraoc (2026-02-16 11:59:27+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178605477
❤️‍🔥 (2026-03-19 13:39:44+00:00): thanks for your edits! one of these signs is not rendering propertly, see https://openrailwaymap.app/#view=18.4/-37.815463/144.966662&style=signals

could you please confirm if this is a CBTC sign? if yes, we need to apply the same tags as the other CBTC signs nearby. 

there's some documentation about australian rail signals here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Railways
diamondarmorsteve (2026-02-22 18:39:21+00:00): Hello, thank you for your contributions for the map! In the future, please use the correct tags for the features being added. For example, use highway=street_lamp on the street lamps you've added here. Using incorrect tags (such as leisure=park on a street lamp) can cause confusion for some programs that use OpenStreetMap data.
dknelson9876 (2026-02-17 04:05:13+00:00): What do you gain by merging a duplex into a single area?

I feel like it's preferable to keep them as separate areas and tag building=semidetached_house, because then you have the detail of it being a duplex, and which address is which
mvexel (2026-02-17 16:25:57+00:00): I think we're both partly right?
In this case, the building does in fact have two separate entrances, so semi_detached makes sense - but it would have to be side-by-side and not one street-facing and one in the back.

I often see buildings that are built as single-family houses converted to frankenstein apartment buildings, with one entrance giving access to the different apartments. Sometimes exterior stairs have been added to create a separate enrtrance to a second floor apartment. Those are usually one address with 1,2,3 or a,b,c for the individual apartments. Those are usually not split like this unless they have separate addresses.

So what I will do here is re-create the dual polygon and tag them as semi-detached, but properly side by side.

Thanks for catching me here.
mvexel (2026-02-17 17:13:31+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178689582#map=22/40.7494986/-111.8614482&layers=V for those edits.
Hans Thompson (2026-02-16 05:54:02+00:00): The FNBP to Glenn Hwy route is something I hadn't fully considered.  It really puts together alot of existing segments I'm familiar with.  interesting!
Lynke574 (2026-02-16 21:03:18+00:00): Great! I use WaymarkedTrails and Opencyclemap views a lot and hope if people are using apps with OSM data, creating these as routes can help them see larger segments to put together safer, more enjoyable long rides
MassCartog (2026-02-16 14:34:07+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM. Features you removed in this changeset are valid. Please don’t remove valid OSM data.

You have a new account and might not be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground. If it exists on the ground, it is valid data regardless of a feature being public or private, designated or informal/illegal/unauthorized. Removing features that exist is actually considered vandalism.

It's clear that these features still exist on the ground. Not being public access areas is an invalid reason to remove data from OSM. So this edit is incorrect and damaging to valid OSM data.

The correct way to handle this is to use OSM's tagging system. access=private, or access=no would be appropriate if they are closed to the public. Once this is done, services that do use OSM data will reflect that and specify their access.

Please read this for more info:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won't_delete_roads_on_private_property

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F
Napowan (2026-02-16 14:47:42+00:00): The road and trail that I removed no longer exists, so the referenced links are not valid or accurate. Fences have been added, trees planted and other pieces that as land has transferred ownership.  It is no longer passable.
Napowan (2026-02-16 14:48:14+00:00): Also "Flintlock Village" no longer exists and that label must be removed
MassCartog (2026-02-16 15:03:38+00:00): Okay if it no longer exists it can be removed. Make sure to add information like that in your chageset comment so other users understand why you are removing things! thanks
Udarian (2026-02-16 18:42:07+00:00): there was a small issue with this changeset, when you attached node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/544218590 to the new bridge area it shifted if significantly from the centerline and thus correct alignment for the motorway link ways it is a part of. This has been fixed. Please be more careful next time.

Happy mapping,
Udar.
Arlo James Barnes (2026-02-19 21:04:28+00:00): Hola, no estoy seguro de que actualmente sea un rancho. Los nuevos propietarios han dicho que desean convertirlo en un centro religioso.

https://osm.org/way/1480002479

Hello, I'm not sure that it is a ranch currently. The new owners have said they wish to make it a religious center.
cronoser (2026-03-24 01:20:48+00:00): Era el nombre hasta donde conozco, un saludo
NeisBot (2026-02-16 04:15:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 46 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/6041209 v7 | 8 crossings
https://osm.org/way/32498928 v4 | 8 crossings
https://osm.org/way/32498960 v4 | 8 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/49632292 v6
https://osm.org/node/49049095 v6
https://osm.org/node/365379296 v10

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178608383
NeisReview (2026-02-24 05:34:57+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/178633132
DDD丶Samuel (2026-03-26 05:28:07+00:00): 您好，请注意铁路工程名和国铁集团公布的线路名差别。国铁集团口径并没有“商合杭高速”这条线路，商合杭高速线肥东-湖州段属于合杭高速线。请尽快修改
pitscheplatsch (2026-02-16 18:04:07+00:00): Hi World_Winner,

It would be great if you could leave a quick comment on the reverted changeset next time. You can also do that directly through the tool you used. Thanks a lot for taking care of the revert!

Best,
Pascal
World_Winner (2026-02-25 12:16:42+00:00): Hi pitscheplatsch, thank you very much for your constructive feedback to improvement, much appreciated. We are also discussing the same topic within the team and will make sure to adapt the best practices on our edits. 
Always happy to support.
pitscheplatsch (2026-02-25 16:52:25+00:00): Thanks!
Alliegaytor (2026-02-16 05:55:40+00:00): Hi, please try to keep changesets to one continent. It makes it harder to review if the bounding box is this large.
FajrAl (2026-02-18 00:41:04+00:00): @cnvery 您好，请尝试将变更集保留到本地。如果边界框这么大，审查就会变得更加困难。这不是您第一次这样做，人们不断评论您的编辑变更集！
cnvery (2026-07-07 14:02:07+00:00): Hi @Alliegaytor & @FajrAl, thanks for friendly reminder and comments. Will split into smaller changesets in the future.
Taya_S (2026-02-19 09:46:19+00:00): Reverted test edits by user "surajTEST"

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178763098
Glassman (2026-02-16 18:33:21+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178609947
dknelson9876 (2026-02-17 04:42:46+00:00): Not sure why you flagged this as review requested, but it looks good to me. The only thing I would nitpick is that I prefer to leave "Suite" out of addr:unit=*, since that seems like the popular thing to do. Or that I didn't even know his legal name is "Michael S Lee", so I would've gone for name=* and official_name=* instead of alt_name=* and name=*
NeisBot (2026-02-16 06:06:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13568811862 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Healthcare facility"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-25 05:35:06+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179018838
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
vng_me (2026-02-16 11:15:37+00:00): Coastlines are broken here.
Trần Thanh Tuấn (2026-02-17 02:16:00+00:00): I'll check again, thanks.
Bienson (2026-02-16 21:04:31+00:00): osm.wiki/DE:Key:circumference?uselang=de

Beispiel
circumference=2.3 beschreibt Stamm mit einem Umfang von 2,3 Metern
Taya_S (2026-02-16 10:21:33+00:00): Reverted fictional editing

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178621668
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-16 07:01:10+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13568888102

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
ikostyabik (2026-02-16 07:03:31+00:00): #mapbox_linters
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-17 01:52:43+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13568901034

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-17 01:52:32+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13568871997

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-17 01:52:54+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13568915036

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Rainero (2026-03-15 12:47:42+00:00): Revert mit changeset/179896511
(unzulässige Quelle)
NeisBot (2026-02-16 07:12:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 7 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/893358466 v9 | 4 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/11167031368 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178613796
pitscheplatsch (2026-02-16 08:30:45+00:00): In this case, it seems the reported issues are false positives. The geometries were not changed in a way that would introduce crossings, and the tagging adjustments did not create any new conflicts.

Sorry for the inconvenience, and thanks again for your map edits.

Regards,
Pascal
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-17 01:52:40+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13568877386

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-17 01:52:55+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13568923506

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀