piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
flo2154 (2025-06-25 07:37:20+00:00): Ich habe in https://osm.org/changeset/168080238 noch den Etymologie-Tag von der Schwalbenstraße rüberkopiert, ansonsten wäre jetzt dieses Stück Schwalbenstraße nach einem Fasan benannt :D
citro (2025-06-25 07:41:51+00:00): Danke
kadiwa (2025-06-25 14:58:34+00:00): Hallo Wolfgang Holtz,
an diesem Straßenabschnitt gibt es keinen Radfahrstreifen oder Schutzstreifen. Man sieht das gut auf diesem Luftbild: https://metaver.de/trefferanzeige?docuuid=86bbb89e-df36-4436-b394-913998629ba5
Sonst ist hier ein Bild vor Ort: https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/8ipg5xkits1t6rzqd1cli/IMG_3962.jpg?rlkey=y9mtdc5yfbn9bvi1u7rh3dv8h
Wolfgang Holtz (2025-06-26 19:10:59+00:00): Dort wo hier das orange Rechteck die betreffende Änderung markiert, ist ein Radfahrstreifen! = Durchgezogene Linien trennt Kfz von Fahrrad.
Das Bild auf Dropbox zeigt den 
westlichen Radweg Fahrtrichtung Süden!
https://www.file-upload.net/en/download-15510680/KreiselSderelbe.jpg.html
Links auf dem Bild, Blick über den Kreisel in die Hannoversche Straße, hinter dem Lichtmast fährt Kfz Ri. Süden, links daneben: Kfz-Fahrspur Ri. Norden, daneben Rafahrstreifen, am Bildrand Gehweg.
kadiwa (2025-06-26 19:25:38+00:00): Nein, der Radfahrstreifen hört ein kleines Stückchen südlich von diesem Node auf: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/131144
Wie gesagt, im Luftbild kann man das gut sehen. Auf unseren beiden Bildern eher nicht so.

Falls du das Luftbild in iD benutzen willst, kannst du einfach auf Custom klicken und da diesen Link eingeben: https://geodienste.hamburg.de/wms_dop_zeitreihe_unbelaubt?LAYERS=dop_zeitreihe_unbelaubt&STYLES=&FORMAT=image/jpeg&CRS={proj}&WIDTH={width}&HEIGHT={height}&BBOX={bbox}&VERSION=1.3.0&SERVICE=WMS&REQUEST=GetMap
Wolfgang Holtz (2025-07-01 14:32:57+00:00): Hi, dieser Radfahrstreifen solte nun in etwa passen. Die Einmündung Hafenbezirk und Radweg in die Nartenstr. sieht anders aus, als eingezeichnet.
Wo inm iD finde ich "Custom"?
kadiwa (2025-07-01 14:47:18+00:00): Das kann gut sein, die Einmündung hab ich nicht wirklich angepasst.

Custom (oder deutsch „Benutzerdefiniert“) ist die unterste Auswahlmöglichkeit bei dem Bildmaterial.
Mex (2025-06-25 08:26:09+00:00): thanks :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168068187
Comino (2025-06-25 01:06:23+00:00): Hi Pura Vida Bitcoin,

In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes".

Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag !
Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead.

For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Merchants#legacy-tags
and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bitcoin

Happy mapping,

Edwin
MassCartog (2025-06-25 00:31:23+00:00): Hello welcome to OSM! Please read the page about mapping storage rentals, read the section "How to map". It is not correct to remove the buildings.

Please fix by bring back the buildings and then only tag the area around as "storage_rental". Let me know if you need a hand fixing this!

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dstorage_rental
MrLocalFixer (2026-06-07 10:47:27+00:00): damn! what a level of detail!
Please do visit "Jogowal Jattan" and suggest me some edits too.
Nater Kane (2025-06-30 21:56:38+00:00): there is definitely a trail here, it just may not be visible at the moment due to overgrowth or some other maintenance issue. i'd update the trail visibility, not delete a section that may be visible or passable during a different time of year.
Nater Kane (2025-06-30 22:07:35+00:00): the two deleted fords, for example, i have crossed within the last year.
Matt Post (2025-06-30 22:15:57+00:00): Can you elaborate? Why were they marked bicycle=yes? I got routed here by Strava on a bike ride from Frederick to Baltimore and it was frustrating to have to backtrack 45 minutes to Marriotsville Road.
Nater Kane (2025-06-30 22:24:17+00:00): I completely appreciate the frustration, and the quality issues of strava's routing feature is a whole other thing... in this park for example, unless a trails is explicitly marked as foot traffic only, all trails are understood to be accessible to foot, bicycle, and horse. Trail visibility, or mtb:scale can better inform on what to expect for a given section. 

As far as fords are concerned, water levels change, rocks move or get moved around, etc.

I've done my share of hike-a-bike in patapsco when goofing around on a gravel bike a few years ago. 

Why one of the ways was marked skateboard=yes, that needs/needed to be cleand up.

I hope this clears things up for you.
Nater Kane (2025-06-30 22:25:56+00:00): you can also always add a "Fix Me" tag to anything on here that you may find questionable or suspect.
DaveF (2025-06-25 15:31:01+00:00): What is this?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19285267#map=17/51.477741/-2.620587
MacLondon (2025-06-30 10:51:31+00:00): It appears to be a Sustrans link to shops at the east end of the route.

https://explore.osmaps.com/?lat=51.47851&lon=-2.62066&zoom=15.7422&overlays=os-ncn-layer&style=Standard&type=2d
DaveF (2025-07-04 20:59:25+00:00): Why doesn't it have  as ref?
MacLondon (2025-07-05 23:42:59+00:00): On the ground, it's just not numbered, so it's more "noref=yes".

If it wasn't shown and labelled on the official Sustrans map as being part of the NCN, it would actually make more sense.

Some of this unnumbered section of NCN is mapped online by EuroVelo as being their route for EV1 and EV2 rather than following the signed NCN 4... but that's probably more to do with EuroVelo not being up to date with how NCN4 seems to have gotten realigned to match a what seems to be a relatively new local route.
MassCartog (2025-06-25 00:32:05+00:00): Hello welcome to OSM! Please read the page about mapping storage rentals, read the section "How to map". It is not correct to remove the buildings.

Please fix by bring back the buildings and then only tag the area around as "storage_rental". Let me know if you need a hand fixing this!

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dstorage_rental
kadiwa (2025-06-25 15:26:47+00:00): Nur als Info: Eine Radwegbenutzungspflicht i. S. d. StVO gibt es an dieser Stelle nicht. Benutzungspflichten können nur für Radwege oder Radfahrstreifen, nicht aber für eine Nebenfahrbahn bestehen, auch dann nicht, wenn der Radverkehr dort hingeleitet wird.
Ob man diesen kleinen Abschnitt jetzt aber trotzdem so taggt ist mir eigentlich egal.
KTim (2025-06-25 16:24:57+00:00): Das stimmt. Ich war mir auch nicht sicher, was der korrekte Ansatz ist. Am Ende habe ich es so gemacht, weil es bei Benutzung der benutzungspflichtigen Radwege in Anbetracht der Einbahnstraßenregelungen keine legale Möglichkeit gibt, auf diesen Abschnitt zu kommen. Aber ein anderes Tagging wäre völlig fein für mich.
stasiu512 (2025-08-17 16:55:41+00:00): Hello, are you sure there is a trolleybus traction line here?
MassCartog (2025-06-25 00:32:24+00:00): Hello welcome to OSM! Please read the page about mapping storage rentals, read the section "How to map". It is not correct to remove the buildings.

Please fix by bring back the buildings and then only tag the area around as "storage_rental". Let me know if you need a hand fixing this!

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dstorage_rental
MassCartog (2025-06-25 00:35:10+00:00): Hello welcome to OSM, it seems like there are service roads here? Looks like roads come off the main road and go between the buildings so people can load/unload storage units. I even see cars there. Could you explain what you were thinking, and why you didnt replace them with anything else?
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:33:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168127729 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:58:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
MassCartog (2025-06-25 00:35:31+00:00): Hello welcome to OSM, it seems like there are service roads here? Looks like roads come off the main road and go between the buildings so people can load/unload storage units. I even see cars there. Could you explain what you were thinking, and why you didnt replace them with anything else?
MassCartog (2025-06-25 00:51:56+00:00): Hello, its seems like this was mapped more correct before. You replaced better building outlines with one big inaccurate outline and a vague incorrect use of the name tag "Multiple Businesses". Could you explain your thinking here?
BremenMapper (2025-06-25 11:07:39+00:00): Thanks for the comment.

At first, the labels showed City Hall where B-Fit actually is across the street.  So I fixed that.  Then I realized that "Italian Restaurant" ws in a label where the wooden peel has expanded, so that part was inaccurate.  Bremen Family Eyecare wasn't even listed at the north end of the complex, it just showed blank, and there was a continuous error about buliding lines overlapping.

So rather than keep all those mislabels and errors, I made it ONE building, (which is actually what it as as they are all connected) and changed the label.  The idea was I'd figure out later how to correct the overlapping lines, and relabel each individual business correctly.

So my thought was it was better to have general "Multiple Business..." rather than incorrect and missing labels.
MassCartog (2025-06-25 13:07:25+00:00): Thanks for the response, and thanks for taking another look and your fixes! Happy mapping!
yargil (2025-07-08 19:49:20+00:00): Bonjour Philippe9517,

Pourquoi avoir supprimer les trottoirs que j'avais ajouté ?
Ce n'est pas le seul changeset où tu as effacé des trottoirs.
Matt McCutchen (2025-06-24 23:20:21+00:00): I am assuming the highway=primary tag was just a mistake in https://osm.org/changeset/76241229.  If there is some justification for it, feel free to revert.
nevw (2025-06-25 13:07:03+00:00): Hi, I think you have added the wrong housenumber here.
I guess the numbers go from 52 to 62 for this group of residences and #54 seems to me to have been already mapped correctly. It appears to me that the one you added should be #58 ?
If I am correct, can you add #’s 56-62 and also add addr:street=Nellie Hamilton Avenue to each too, thanks.
nevw (2025-06-30 09:13:07+00:00): no response, mapped logical sequence of house numbers in street and needs confirmation.
Bretty (2025-06-30 11:58:20+00:00): Those changes look correct.  Sorry but I missed your original comment.  When I made my initial addition I was caught staring at the number 54 and messed up.  Thank you.
nevw (2025-06-30 12:52:38+00:00): Thanks, we got it right afterall.
kitsee (2025-08-06 20:11:36+00:00): Hello Phillip,
Could I kindly ask you to be a bit more cautious when adding UPRNs? I’ve just come across a couple of areas of grass where UPRNs have been added, which doesn’t quite seem to make sense. In one case, for example, the UPRN appears to correspond to a bus stop shelter rather than the entire grassy area:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/255371122

There’s no issue with adding UPRNs when the centroid clearly lines up with a building like a house but adding them in places like this doesn't make sense. It would be great to avoid guesswork where possible.

Thanks for your contributions!
philipcullen (2025-08-06 23:41:33+00:00): Hi Kits,

I've found that UPRNs do sometimes get assigned to parcels of land (especially council owned land, but it seems to depend on the council), but in this case I think you're right and the UPRN is for the bus stop. I've added the bus stop in, moved the UPRN to it, and looked over some other ones in the area around it.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-06-24 23:50:50+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12950323838

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Glassman (2025-06-25 12:19:47+00:00): #TIP: If the business occupies the entire building, just tag the building with the business information instead of duplicating some of the information on a node. If multiple businesses operate in a building, then add each as a node.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168071380
Gregory Peony (2025-07-22 06:11:06+00:00): Hi, it's unnecessary to map the footprint of power towers. Check https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_features if you come across features you're not familiar with. I deleted this. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168071503
NeisBot (2025-06-28 14:45:44+00:00): Hi schuhk, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 89% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 5 landuse(')

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=168071516
NeisReview (2025-07-05 19:26:38+00:00): #golf #mapping
ilias_ (2025-06-25 11:54:03+00:00): That's a big changeset
022 (2025-07-03 14:45:39+00:00): Hi there, 

I just wanted to leave a quick comment asking if in the future you could avoid attaching landuse to boundaries & roads. 

I have been working on an import of post-2023 NB municipal boundaries, and my work has been made more difficult due to features being snapped to the existing boundary members. 

Maybe try and attach the residential to the CanVec forest tiles instead, or just leave them detached from anything. I have already fixed all the boundaries in the Fredericton region so you don`t need to worry about it but I just thought I'd let you know. 

This makes it easier for me when I am downloading province wide boundary data, and reduces import conflicts. Maybe in the future if more boundary work needs to be done it is better to have them seperated. 

Thank you !!
citrula (2025-06-27 04:25:17+00:00): dog trainers should be tagged as amenity=animal_training + animal_training=dog , not as dog parks
Glassman (2025-06-25 12:35:59+00:00): You might want to check the county data at https://psearch.kitsap.gov/psearch/. If the way you tagged as a path is wide enough for a car, it might just be a driveway, tagged as highway=service + service=driveway. Let me know if you need help figuring this out.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168072654
Glassman (2025-06-25 12:36:00+00:00): You might want to check the county data at https://psearch.kitsap.gov/psearch/. If the way you tagged as a path is wide enough for a car, it might just be a driveway, tagged as highway=service + service=driveway. Let me know if you need help figuring this out.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168072654
yolojess (2025-06-25 22:27:29+00:00): It is absolutely not. Starting from GM-5 (to the east on this map), I walked this 'road' to the point where I cut it off. I think more of it will be cut off. It is bushwhacking, not a road, not a driveway. Parts, after you climb over a large downed tree by the intersection with GM-5, do have a single track walking trail.  I wanted to include an image here, but I cannot.
yolojess (2025-06-25 22:29:59+00:00): The roads that are questionable are not on https://psearch.kitsap.gov/psearch/ (and I think that is more correct, but I have not attempted to set foot on the rest of those segments yet)
Glassman (2025-06-25 22:32:48+00:00): Sounds like it should be removed. Thanks for following up.
PcMouse1 (2025-06-25 02:23:59+00:00): changeset comment: 

addressed fixme on road, added and extended highway=track
PcMouse1 (2025-06-25 02:25:11+00:00): I don't exactly know why this changeset bbox is massive. Could have accidentally added a node to nearby powerline.
Macunaíma (2025-06-25 02:45:14+00:00): *Avenida Fox
Norbert Dichter (2025-06-25 16:39:42+00:00): Thank you for your contributions, @[Esabela] , but please do not set this, and other tasks as mapped, when there is work left. Adjusting older mappings to current image, and so on.
Take care,
Norbert 'Nodi' Dichter, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168073733
NorthCrab_upload (2025-06-25 04:00:41+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/375548007

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Tommybara (2025-06-25 04:31:05+00:00): Mắc gì tên node cứ phải bỏ chữ "phường", "xã" vô chi vậy?
marczoutendijk (2025-09-04 18:52:16+00:00): Hi eerib,
On this spot:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12951035009#map=19/49.694220/-123.123632
you have the tags:
natural=pond
intermittent=yes

To tag a pond, the accepted way nowadays is:
natural=water
water=pond
as can be seen here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:natural
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dwater

You might consider using those tags instead of yours?

Best regards  
Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
eerib (2025-09-04 20:14:40+00:00): Good catch. Fixed the issue in my latest changeset.

Thank you!
NorthCrab_upload (2025-06-25 04:20:50+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/375547911

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
pertile (2025-06-25 11:20:13+00:00): Hi, please changes should be in smaller areas, this one is across 3000 km
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168074762
habi (2026-02-05 08:25:58+00:00): Ciao vmicho
I've just stumbled over the tourism=wilderness_hut that you've added here in the forest.
According to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:tourism%3Dwilderness_hut these huts should have places for sleeping, and I was wondering if that's the case for the buildings here.
Additionally, I cannot see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1409387781 on the available swisstopo Imagery, is that hut still there?
Greetings,
Habi
nevw (2025-06-26 02:56:09+00:00): Hi, osmi detected these two invalid multipolygons. I deleted both and changed to simple polygons.
Examples of invalid mp are here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-06-30 14:36:44+00:00): I removed also healthcare=pharmacy if it is closed (otherwise you have contradictory tagging, it could be also prefixed instead)

yes, this double tagging with healthcare=pharmacy mess is a bad idea
sy_ossfin (2025-06-30 19:08:44+00:00): thx, I have overlooked the 2nd tag
DwarfNebula_ (2025-06-25 08:24:23+00:00): Hi Mond00,

Both of the public_bookcases don't have a brand. Please don't add brands to objects with the nobrand=yes tag.
Yog Sot (2025-06-25 09:51:10+00:00): na pewno chcesz dodawać każdą działke ewidencyjną? ;]
choc ciekawe jest, że dla tej np:
w1409393605
iD oblicza Powierzchnia: 2376 m² (0,24 ha)
a zapisane jest urzędowo niby 2383.199960506754 m2 ? ;]
Feskil (2025-06-26 17:36:44+00:00): Dodaję powierzchniowe obiekty z rejestru zabytków i nie zdążyłem zapisać zmiany przed wyjściem do pracy, stąd taki śmieć został.

Chociaż co do powierzchni może ma to związek z tym jak tworzę plik shp i przenoszę go do josm, zobaczę, czy tam nie ma jakiś zmian
Yog Sot (2025-06-26 20:25:28+00:00): nie no, faktyczna powierzchnie oblicza iD, ale w zal od zastosowanego układu współrzędnych, może dl;atego takie nieścisłości?
Natomiast ta wartość powierzchniowa to raczej zapisana na sztywno dla tego obiektu w tym powierzchniowym rejestrze. 
Ogólnie to obstawiam, że iD liczy prawidłowo, a nasze państwo jak zwykle daje ciała... ale łatwo mogę sprawdzić dla np namalowanej zebry przejścia dla pieszcyh, co mi iD wyliczy ;)
canfe (2025-07-27 05:48:09+00:00): semplicemente genus=populus
eggie (2025-06-25 07:38:37+00:00): Beste svenkl,

Vaak worden die fietspaden niet als roundabout getagd, omdat deze vaak tweerichting zijn voor fietsers en routerelaties dan niet meer werken. 
Houd daar svp rekening mee.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-06-25 07:42:55+00:00): Beste Sven.. En hier werkt de routering niet meer.
Dit is zo'n voorbeeld waar we moeten schipperen en werkt je wijziging averechts. 
Ik draai je wijziging terug.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-06-25 07:45:17+00:00): reverted by changeset #168080675

Je kunt het best dan contact opnemen met de ervaren voorgaande mapper en eerst vragen waarom hij zo 'merkwaardig' in jouw ogen heeft getagd. 

MVG
eggie
OnlyAppleCanDo (2025-06-25 09:00:53+00:00): 英文應該是Xi Jiang River
不是Xi River
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168078018
OnlyAppleCanDo (2025-06-25 09:00:54+00:00): 英文應該是Xi Jiang River
不是Xi River
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168078018
b-holdet (2025-11-29 09:35:47+00:00): @VicVal: Angående eksempelvis https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7179533387

Har du en grund til ikke at fjerne selve noden for el-skabet, hvis skabet fysisk er væk fra stedet?

Hvis du vil bevare de historiske data, så skal de vel bare over på https://www.openhistoricalmap.org
VicVal (2025-11-29 11:28:12+00:00): Der hvor jeg ikke sletter noderne, men gør dem historiske, er hvor der findes evidens for den tidligere station, f.eks. StreetView, Mapillary alle fotos der er knyttet til stedet.

Det har alene været for at undgå at stationer som er konstateret nedtaget, ikke bliver genindsat/forvekslet.

Den anden grund, men som nok kun er for nogle få af os som arbejde med elnetttet, er at vi kan trække rapporter fra OSM, pt. med mere end 3000 stationers detaljer, hvilket ikke kan gøres på samme måde, hvis data ligger i spredt over OSM og OHM.

Sålænge den er historic:power, så burde den ikke blive renderet på noget kort, men blot ligge i databasen (og være synlig for de som redigere).

Lad mig høre hvad du tænker :-)
b-holdet (2025-11-29 11:59:17+00:00): Jeg er lidt ked a at høre, at man ikke selv holder styr på disse historiske data, men er nødt til at benytte OSM.

Grunden til at jeg spørger lidt ind til det er, at hovedreglen for OSM-data jo er, at de skal afspejle de fysiske forhold på stedet.

Så hvis jeg kom forbi en dag og så at skabet var væk, så ville jeg uden tøven og uden din viden, blot slette punktet. På den måde er OSM ikke stedet for opbevaring af historik for eksempelvis El-skabes placeringer.

På samme vis har vi jo heller ikke gamle vejforløb eller bygninger liggende i OSM, da de også forsvinde over tid af andre mapperes oprydninger.

Har I ikke et mere sikkert sted, hvor I opbevarer disse data?
osmviborg (2025-11-29 18:16:22+00:00): OSM er ikke et historisk atlas: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/History
b-holdet (2025-12-01 09:33:25+00:00): @VicVal
Vil denne side være en løsning for jeres historik:
https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/
OSM_RogerWilco (2025-06-25 12:07:30+00:00): Moin geozeisig,

fährt Du die Routen eigentlich auch ab? Oder auf welcher Basis verlegst Du die Routen?

Gruß Roger Wilco
geozeisig (2025-06-25 12:45:14+00:00): Moin,

wenn auf einer Hauptstraße bicycle=use_sidepath steht und parallel ein Radweg mit bicycle=designated sollte die Route über den Radweg verlaufen. JOSM meckert das auch an.

Danach suchen kann man mit
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/26HT

Ansonsten fahre ich schon gerne Fahrrad.

Viele Grüße Dieter