piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
gurglypipe (2026-06-24 10:33:36+00:00): Should https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1531887643 be called Denham Wheel, or should Denham Wheel be a locality?

https://redrosecollections.lancashire.gov.uk/view-item?key=SXsiUCI6eyJ2YWx1ZSI6InJpdmVycyBpbiBzcGF0ZSIsIm9wZXJhdG9yIjoxLCJmdXp6eVByZWZpeExlbmd0aCI6MywiZnV6enlNaW5TaW1pbGFyaXR5IjowLjUsIm1heFN1Z2dlc3Rpb25zIjo1LCJhbHdheXNTdWdnZXN0IjpmYWxzZSwiaW5kZXgiOjF9fQ&WINID=1782297105959#DpOmo3-vb3gAAAGd6JmMxA/268322 suggests that the Wheel is a particular current/water pattern in this area of the river in high water, so I’m not sure if it applies to the whole river area. Tricky one, I’m not sure what the best tagging is.
matty817 (2026-06-26 15:15:51+00:00): Yeah, not super sure. I chose this way because it seems to be agreed that the name relates to this, somehow, bend of the river. place=locality would be more noncommittal (and therefore better if there are doubts here).
gurglypipe (2026-06-27 10:05:58+00:00): What about something like natural=bay? Not saying that tag specifically, but perhaps there’s a generic name for this kind of water flow pattern which we could use in a natural=* tag and name it that way?

Another thought which popped to mind was to add an extra branch of the river way, and name that. That would indicate a bit more that the name refers to the flow pattern.

In fact, the waterway=rapids tags may be quite appropriate here. I’ll go ahead and change to that. Let me know what you think (we can always revert my edit if you disagree).
gurglypipe (2026-06-27 10:10:55+00:00): OK, done in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184688378
matty817 (2026-06-30 08:22:47+00:00): Ah great, thanks!
Alcapone1212 (2026-07-07 03:57:34+00:00): j'ai acheter ce terrain et je ne veux pas personne sur ma propriété je construit ma maison , tout les terrain son vendu et meme le chemin est privé .pouvez vous m'aider merci
MappingMore (2026-07-09 05:35:33+00:00): Hi Alcapone1212,

Thanks for taking the time to review my changes and for leaving your feedback.

I reverted your edits because this highway is present and visible on image, and would get re-added by other mappers as well, based on OSM’s on-the-ground principle (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Map_what's_on_the_ground) 

If this is private property, I’d kindly suggest adding “access=private” tag along with highway=track instead of deletion. That would stop routing tools to guide people through your property. 

Please let me know how else I can be of help.
caprieldeluca (2026-06-24 11:11:07+00:00): Hola, gracias por contribuir con el mapa!
Revisé el conjunto de cambios, hice algunas correcciones. Si están en la zona y pueden contactarse con la comunidad OSM por Telegram o el foro: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Argentina#Contacto
O dejar algún canal de contacto con el grupo Incandescentes en respuesta a este comentario. Gracias!
NorthCrab_upload (2026-06-27 05:44:17+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2282614747
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/81050239
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/81050262

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
keyyushi (2026-06-27 20:25:03+00:00): Merhaba düzenlemeleriniz için teşekkürler.

Mahallesi kısmına düğüm içerisinde gerek olmadığından tekrar kaldırdım. name:suffix olarak zaten 'Mahallesi' kısmı mevcut. Eğer bir yanlışlık olduğunu düşünüyorsanız buradan belirtebilirsiniz.

Ayrıca diğer düzenlemelerinizdeki ( changeset/184514719 ve changeset/184512917 ) isimler eğer gerçekten ordaki fiziksel isimleri olmayıp sadece açıklayıcı olması için konulmuş ise, Vikiye göre name etiketi kullanılmaması gerekiyor.

Tekrardan teşekkürler!

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions
9_tab (2026-06-24 10:00:15+00:00): What's the reasoning behind the removal of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service=driveway from these access roads?
Sebasawk (2026-06-25 17:08:07+00:00): Hi 9_tab, 
I removed the service=driveway tags from the mentioned ways because those roads seemed to function as internal access roads rather than driveways. My edit was based on the OSM Wiki definition for service=driveway (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service=driveway).
Please let me know if I’m misinterpreting things. I’ll be happy to align.
9_tab (2026-06-25 17:37:42+00:00): Which part of the definition are you referring to? The picture illustrating the article might even look like the manor on that property.
d_berger (2026-06-26 22:04:21+00:00): @Sebasawk: just stop changing established local mapping without contacting the community through the Forum. Thank you.

reverted with CS184669860.
9_tab (2026-07-02 09:02:59+00:00): @Sebasawk: even if it was reverted, can we get the reasoning behind this change? I noticed a series of similar changesets. None seem to explain why. I'd think of driveways as access roads, but maybe you read a difference in the definition, please explain.

If you stopped working on this, can you ask somebody else from your employer, TomTom, to follow-up on this question?
Sebasawk (2026-07-02 11:45:05+00:00): Thank you for reverting the changeset and letting me know of local community practices in the area. I will be more aware going forward.
9_tab (2026-07-04 10:44:06+00:00): How do you plan to follow up on your other edits in this field, given the lack of  explanation it in terms of our definition.
unenTT (2026-07-06 12:42:08+00:00): Hi there. I’m Can, a project manager from TomTom’s OSM program. 

Regarding the distinction between a service road and a driveway, our editing team might treat a driveway as a road leading to a single feature only, as the last segment that is branching out from service roads. 

Members of our editing team perform edits globally and mainly stick to Wiki definitions. But we are also aware that mapping practices and interpretations might differ between different communities and regions. And if those different interpretations are also documented on OSM Wiki or another relevant space such as the community forum, we try to respectfully follow the local practices as well. 

In this case, your interpretation of driveways is duly noted as well as your concerns. Please reach out to me and let me know if further alignment would be necessary.
9_tab (2026-07-11 05:18:00+00:00): Thanks for the following-up on this, Can. 

Above I had asked where on the wiki page you read a definition or description of the practice of your editing team, but didn't get an answer. I think you should update the wiki if you think my interpretation diverges from the practice you follow. 

Also, as this is part of a coordinated effort, I think OSMF wants you to draft a page outlining what you plan to do.

Maybe @d_berger wants to add some points.
unenTT (2026-07-21 14:59:29+00:00): Hi 9_tab, thank you for your understanding on my late response as I was out of office and was not able to check my messages until Monday. 

For OSM editing, we don't have an alternative spec document to the OSM Wiki. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities/TomTom#Editing_Requirements states that our editing team refers to OSM Wiki for following community standards. The work process regarding this incident is also documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities/TomTom#TomTom_Map_Feedback

So here Sebasawk referred to the https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service=driveway article in their edit and interpreted things that way. 

Again, local practices and interpretations might differ from region to region, and right now we are also aware what you consider to be a driveway and a service way. We will do our best to take note and align accordingly. 

Please let me know if we'd need to further clarify anything by directly reaching out to me. I'd also happy to connect you with our community manager for Switzerland for deeper discussions, if necessary.
Tomas_J (2026-06-29 04:32:11+00:00): Ahoj, pozri , prosím: https://groups.google.com/g/osm_sk/c/B7m0_4lBC8c
aceman444 (2026-06-29 23:38:15+00:00): Zdravim, tiez poprosim zmysluplnejsie popisy sad zmien ako "GA", "SK" a pod. Pozrite https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Dobr%C3%A9_koment%C3%A1%C5%99e_sad_zm%C4%9Bn .
nevw (2026-06-24 10:31:15+00:00): Hi, the addr:street you have listed seems different from that mapped in osm in this area. Can you check what the correct street address is and if you have mapped the business to the building that the business operates from
onelectrical (2026-06-24 10:53:21+00:00): Hi, I think it's the same place as in GBP - https://maps.app.goo.gl/QSDghvY6BjX9w4Uq7
nevw (2026-06-24 11:48:03+00:00): Another mapper has changed the addr:street to Elizabeth Ave and I agree with that change as we are mapping street addresses. Are you the owner? I wonder if the postal address uses Elizabeth Ave.
By the way, we do not have permission to use Google to assist in mapping things in osm.
mavl (2026-06-25 15:14:12+00:00): Здравствуйте. Подскажите, почему "addr:place=посёлок Андреевский"?
Ozon OSM9 (2026-06-25 16:41:05+00:00): Здравствуйте. Спасибо за комментарий. Действительно, по названию населённого пункта была допущена ошибка, случайно указала соседний населённый пункт. Откатила изменения сделанные ранее. Вернусь к правке после уточнения корректного адреса.
flohoff (2026-06-24 13:33:59+00:00): Moin,
also da passt dein changeset kommentar nicht zu dem was du gemacht hast:

https://osm.zz.de/routeqa/?rid=1219422,1294793#50.9609,7.98499,18z

Diese routing änderung hat sich ergeben - Das liegt vermutlich da dran das du da wege zu oneways gemacht hast oder umgedreht oder eingefügt? 

Jedenfalls ist das routing so kaputt.
flohoff (2026-06-24 13:36:24+00:00): Hier der weg der jetzt gefahren wird.

Mittendrin ist ein stück da ist der oneway falsch rum - Oder - er muss so sein wie die Kreuzung gerade designed ist:

https://tmp.zz.de/20260624-KiteRelearn/brokencrossing.png
flohoff (2026-06-24 13:45:46+00:00): Hier hast du im übrigen die REF gelöscht die NWSIB selber listet - Das ist definitiv falsch:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27790610/history
staka-RBK_04 (2026-06-24 13:54:29+00:00): Hallo flohoff,

das mit dem Routing kann ich nicht ganz nachvollziehen. Eigentlich war ich nur am REF Feld dran. 
Bzgl. des REF Feldes hast du aber absolut Recht! Mein Fehler.
flohoff (2026-06-24 13:57:06+00:00): Ah - mist - mein Fehler - stimmt - andere changeset - TomTom kaputtrepariert
eggie (2026-06-24 10:42:12+00:00): Welkom bij OSM,

Bedankt voor uw bijdrage.
..name=...  is voldoende.
De description op deze manier hoort neutraal te zijn. Dat is hij nu niet.
Svp aanpassen naar een korte neutrale beschrijving.
Mvg,
eggie
Validator
Supaplex (2026-06-25 04:50:56+00:00): 電話國碼前漏了+號了
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184516987
danieldegroot2 (2026-06-27 13:41:46+00:00): Hey eliasp,

POIs with names like ... Praxis fur ... seems like descriptive name.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions

see also
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice

Good to see you already know about healthcare tags. If you are unsure how to tag something, add a note or fixme tag and discuss with the local community (I assume you already do this though)

If you really have to, then use the description tag for more information, but be aware tags are limited to like 256 characters, so it may not fit and cause you to lose (existing) details.

Regards,

Daniel
pitscheplatsch (2026-06-24 22:57:33+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
Is the added name real?
Bike Only (1236191903), v2
Omer_A7 (2026-06-25 08:42:02+00:00): Hello 
Yes its Bike Only or Bicycle Only
pitscheplatsch (2026-06-25 09:42:20+00:00): Hi, thanks for your reply.

In OSM, the name=* tag should only contain the real proper name of the object, exactly as it is signed or officially named. “Bike Only” / “Bicycle Only” sounds more like a description or access restriction than a name.

Could you please confirm whether there is an actual sign or official source showing this as the name? If it only means that the place/path is for bicycles only, it should probably be mapped with access/bicycle-related tags instead of name=*.

Thanks!
AndyB_66 (2026-06-24 13:46:30+00:00): OSM to nie banner reklamowy!
Ltrlg (2026-06-25 21:33:52+00:00): Il y a vraiment un nom indiqué sur/utilisé pour way/636344289 ou bien c’est juste un playground=climbingframe sans nom ? Je ne vois rien qui pourrait indiquerr un nom sur Panoramax (les photos sont pourtant bien proches)
eggie (2026-06-24 11:02:11+00:00): In ieder geval neutraal.
Inkorten zou nog kunnen.
De wesite is eigenlijk bedoeld voor info over het bedrijf.

Mvg 
eggie
eggie (2026-06-24 11:06:24+00:00): Beste,

Tip.. pas niet te veel aan in zo n groot gebied.
Schuiven met de kaart geeft vaak schade. Je verplaatst dan ongemerkt nodes met alles dat er aan vastzit.

Mvg,
eggie
mrH3nk (2026-06-24 11:48:12+00:00): Goed om te weten, ik zal er in het vervolg rekening mee houden.
eggie (2026-06-24 11:51:21+00:00): Het is verder oke.. geen schade. 😀
DwarfNebula_ (2026-06-24 15:25:19+00:00): Hey ik heb de addr:street tag van Wonderwoods afgehaald. Alle adrespunten met addr:street staan al los in de database.
eggie (2026-06-24 15:29:01+00:00): Thx... Ik had alleen met mn mobiel gescreend.
Beetje ruzie met de wifi.
themi97 (2026-06-24 18:19:36+00:00): Why did you remove the Turkish name of the road. Official languages of the island are Greek and Turkish. Here we use the ground rule for the names therefore the main name is in greek. Any other name that is a direct translation of said official name can be present. I will revert this changes.
flohoff (2026-06-24 13:52:08+00:00): Good catch - the crossing was broken. 

My route monitoring now switched to using this path:

Red -> Old / Green - > New

https://osm.zz.de/routeqa/?rid=1183309,1294924#52.04204,8.5506,16z
Shre_WD (2026-06-24 16:52:18+00:00): Hi flohoff, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you.
Shre_WD (2026-06-25 17:02:57+00:00): Hi flohoff,
 
I have corrected the cycleway, sidewalk, and turn tags to reflect the current on-the-ground situation.
 
Could you please confirm whether these changes have resolved the routing issue, or if any further edits are still required? If there is anything else that needs attention, kindly let me know.
user_5359 (2026-06-25 09:58:42+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2sfo ? What is the mean of the tags
DPS = Sud-Kivu
attributio = Référentiel Géographique Commun (RGC.cd) (did you mean attribution)
health_lev = 8 (did you mean health_level, see https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/health_level)
is_in_hl6 = Kamituga (did you mean is_in:health_level6)
ref_CDsnis = 62240323 (did you mean ref:CD:snis)
ref_dhis2 = sRUxRtue777 (did you mean ref:dhis2)
source_dat = 2025 (did you mean source:geometry:date)
source_geo = CIESIN (did you mean source:geometry)
?
MappingMore (2026-06-25 09:05:40+00:00): Partially Revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184514852
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-25 02:56:25+00:00): Apparently deliberately mistagging a payday loan shop is a hospital with no less than three such tags (plus malformed phone/fax numbers) is a serious regression from previous changesets, particularly your last changeset 182848091  , which contained mostly correct tags and little to no SEO spam (besides the non-useful changeset comment).

https://osm.org/changeset/182848091

I very nearly reverted it, and will next time if this is repeated. However, this time I did you a favor and cleaned up the SEO spam/nonsense tagging for you in changeset 184559493

https://osm.org/changeset/184559493
limes11 (2026-06-24 15:35:29+00:00): Hi,

das building=hospital ist weiter korrekt.

Nutzung wird über amenity abgebildet.

Schöne Grüße
Graf-Karto (2026-06-24 15:58:31+00:00): building=hospital wieder hinzugefügt.
Filohipo (2026-06-24 11:42:32+00:00): Porque apagou uma empresa que tem sede  no edificio em L da herdade da Matinha ?
Porque disfarça um acto de censura com o pretexto de corrigir um endereço ?
Tem algo contra a empresa Sociedade Agro-Pecuária da Matinha?
PL 2188677 (2026-06-24 11:55:25+00:00): Não é censura nenhuma, era um erro e respondi-lhe em detalhe por mensagem privada enviada agora. A morada aliás tinha acabado de ser colocada como S/N (sem número), corrigi tudo o que estava errado. Isso é uma velha adega
PL 2188677 (2026-06-24 11:56:14+00:00): Leia as mensagens privadas enviadas sobre este assunto
eggie (2026-06-24 11:53:43+00:00): Welkom bij OSM...
Gelst dat ook voor tweewilers. Zoniet dan toevoegen oneway:bicycle=no en ook voor mofa en moped ivt.
Mvg
eggie
pepdeb (2026-06-24 15:35:41+00:00): Hi Eggie,

thanks for your response. 

Yes, this also applies to mopeds. Under Dutch traffic law, mopeds are classified as vehicles.The entry ban indicated by sign C2 applies to all vehicles by default. This means you cannot enter the street with a moped, scooter, speed-pedelec, or car.

There is one exception (sub-signs)
"Uitgezonderd fietsers": It only shows a bicycle so cyclists are allowed to enter. Mopeds (yellow license plate) are strictly forbidden.

I'll add it.
Thnx,

Pepijn
eggie (2026-06-24 15:42:08+00:00): Hi.. It looks to me you duplicated the street on top of the street?
eggie (2026-06-24 15:45:11+00:00): So.. remove the duplicated way.
Edit the former way with
oneway=yes
oneway:bicycle=no

No accesstags for motor_vehicle
pepdeb (2026-06-24 15:45:16+00:00): i'm not sure what i did wrong. Should i change anything? Sorry!
eggie (2026-06-24 15:48:26+00:00): Ho.. fon't worry.. just try it according instruction. I'll have a look later on.
I look on my gsm now.
pepdeb (2026-06-24 15:51:36+00:00): ok let me know if it's ok now. The arrows  should point from south to north
eggie (2026-06-24 15:58:48+00:00): Hi,

I removed the road ontop of the road.
I added oneway=yes and oneway:bicycle=no

It's okay.
The curve a difficulties in osmmapping is very steep.

Greetz,
eggie
pepdeb (2026-06-24 16:01:10+00:00): excellent, thanks for helping out. Hopefully this will help a lot.
pepdeb (2026-06-24 16:02:09+00:00): btw the arrows still point in the wrong direction. Should be from south to north.
eggie (2026-06-24 16:26:36+00:00): No.. That's the cache  CTRL-F5 key.

Why motor_vehicle = no????  Please explain
eggie (2026-06-24 16:29:23+00:00): It;s allowed to drive wirh a car from the south to the north?

In that case don't tag motor_vehicle=no
eggie (2026-06-24 16:23:30+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-06-24 12:22:32+00:00): Welkom bij OSM,

Bedankt voor uw bijdrage. Svp op de adres node bijtaggen.. dus niet op de gebouwomtrek.
Mvg,
eggie
eggie (2026-06-24 16:21:48+00:00): De info heb ik verplaatst naar een adresnode.
Yunan973 (2026-06-25 16:17:33+00:00): Bonjour,
attention, le cadastre est très souvent mal positionné, cf. par exemple ici si tu regardes avec le cadastre puis avec PCRS raster https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=id&way=75602460#map=20/43.0657795/0.7580134 ou ici https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=id&way=75602460#map=20/43.0663838/0.7577150 : la position des bâtiments au cadastre semble ok, mais elle est en fait catastrophique.
Il faut toujours ajuster ce que tu crées avec les images satellites et jamais le cadastre sauf si tu décales le cadastre pour qu'il corresponde aux images satellite.
De plus, les rivières et ruisseaux sont représentés dans OSM via des lignes et non des surfaces. Tu peux rajouter des surfaces mais uniquement après avoir créé des lignes représentant le milieu des cours d'eau.
Cordialement
andrewwka (2026-06-24 12:04:40+00:00): Andijan*
Wanderer2000 (2026-06-24 12:23:03+00:00): Waarom verander je de shrubbery naar scrub? Dit stond al goed gemapt...

Ik heb het weer teruggezet.
eggie (2026-06-24 16:22:44+00:00): Info samengevoegd. Svp geen spaties in postcode.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-06-24 16:20:09+00:00): De info heb ik samengevoegd met de adresnode.
gr eggie
giggls (2026-06-28 12:37:02+00:00): Why are you deleting this?
I had a very friendly conversation with the Nomady people and they even allowed us an import.
The reason I did not do an import is that their coordinates are not good enough for osm use.
Peter_v_Aalst (2026-07-03 09:19:31+00:00): Hi Giggles,

thanks for the clarification. I deleted the Nomady entries because other mappers pointed out that copying data from camping portals may require explicit permission, and I couldn’t verify that such permission was documented for OSM use.

It’s good to hear that you talked to Nomady and that they allowed an import. Is this permission documented somewhere? If you can send me a link, I’d be happy to re-add the camps.

Until then I’d rather not restore them myself. If you can confirm the permission and are comfortable taking responsibility for it, feel free to revert my deletions.

Best,
Peter
giggls (2026-07-03 09:25:29+00:00): Well they allowed me to do an import but a discussion in the forum revealed that the coordinates from their API are not good enough for OSM use.

Thus I decided to not do an import.

I should probably set up a Wiki page regarding this issue.

Discussion is here:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/import-der-campingplatze-von-https-nomady-camp/142439
giggls (2026-07-03 14:12:40+00:00): Ah I forget that nomady sites should have a ref tag to make them referenzable in nomady database.
Also capacity:* tag and maystay is important.
Peter_v_Aalst (2026-07-04 11:17:33+00:00): Thanks a lot for the link. The discussion was very helpful.

I agree that a Wiki page would be useful. With your comments about referenzing, capacity and maxstay, the tagging side is clear to me now.

If you could also send me a link to where the Nomady permission is documented, I’d be happy to continue adding suitable places.
Marcilio Farias (2026-06-24 13:08:31+00:00): Removed fake/meme POI created in changeset 184292917. The name was not real/verifiable.
eggie (2026-06-24 16:17:55+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-06-24 16:17:20+00:00): Wanneer je er echt niet mag fietsen lijkt het me oke.
Wanneer het Eigenterrein is kun je beter foot=permissive taggen. 

MVG
eggie
rempshaener (2026-06-24 17:27:52+00:00): Hallo,
woher weißt du denn, dass der Hydrant fertiggestellt wurde?
Viele Grüße
CAM-Gerlach (2026-06-25 02:03:27+00:00): Hi PowerMapper,

Thanks for the updates! power=* mapping is one of the areas I don't really touch, so it's helpful to have a dedicated expert take a look!

Just one request--for your future changesets, it would be great if you could add a little more detail/explanation to your changeset comments, about what you changed, how and why. For example, "Upgraded minor line to high-voltage per [SOURCE]" (or specifying a changeset source=*). See https://osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments for more info on that.

Thanks, and happy mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184523472
osmviborg (2026-06-24 15:20:29+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1531970566
user_5359 (2026-06-25 09:39:41+00:00): Hallo! Bitte schau Dir nochmal den Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1531934819 an. Was ist die Bedeutung von den beiden Tags
ORTSTEIL=Dorfhain
SCHLüSSEL=14628090000
?
Ropino (2026-06-25 10:24:33+00:00): Hallo,
Danke für den Hinweis, da habe ich vor dem Hochladen verpasst die temporären Werte zu entfernen. Ist jetzt erledigt.
VG