piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NorthCrab_upload (2024-06-28 17:20:27+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12018266747
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/718890087

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NM$L (2024-06-29 09:21:49+00:00): 你好，结合您先前做出的编辑，你似乎正在再一次删除实际存在的名称，但没有给出合理的理由。请你查看先前编辑集讨论中提及的关于争议地区的名称表示方法。

该变更集已在 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153323493 中回退。
NM$L (2024-06-29 09:22:03+00:00): 你好，结合您先前做出的编辑，你似乎正在再一次删除实际存在的名称，但没有给出合理的理由。请你查看先前编辑集讨论中提及的关于争议地区的名称表示方法。

该变更集已在 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153323493 中回退。
canfe (2024-08-29 07:50:28+00:00): access=yes vuol dire che può passare anche un carico pericoloso.
Se non metti niente vuol dire che si passa, al limite inserisci solo le restrizioni se sono segnate.
Tolto.
mavl (2024-11-13 06:16:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159077163 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible sources - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16857].
skorasaurus (2024-06-29 13:48:53+00:00): also confirmed with cuyahoga county's borders as well.
whb_revert (2024-06-28 17:39:26+00:00): This changeset reverts changeset 153162031, 153162032, 153162035, 153162036, 153162038, 153162039, 153162040, 153162041, 153208277, 153208278.
Andrea Musuruane (2024-06-30 15:15:31+00:00): Ciao. In Italia il numero civico è il numero che contraddistingue l'accesso esterno che dall’area di circolazione (strada, piazza, via, ecc) immette direttamente o indirettamente alle unità immobiliari (abitazioni, esercizi commerciali, uffici, garage, ecc.) o alle aree recintate non edificate (es. stabilimenti balneari). Non è quindi corretto associare i tag addr:* ad un edificio. Bisogna quindi inserire un nodo in corrispondenza dell'accesso dove si trova la targhetta ed etichettalo opportunamente. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Addresses#Regole_specifiche_per_l'Italia Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153304587
Aiman (2024-08-23 13:27:17+00:00): ciao,
sì certo, dopo modifico
miluethi (2025-03-20 00:00:35+00:00): I'm deleting this crazy big building shapes. Please work more carefully or simply stay away from OSM. Thank you.
nevw (2024-07-08 10:14:09+00:00): Hi
Osmi finds a problem to fix here
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=152.97068&lat=-26.60730&zoom=17
tyfi (2024-06-28 18:11:09+00:00): addressed note 4040493
gr4yweb (2024-07-01 12:30:15+00:00): Ja, da stimme ich dir zu. Ich hatte das in einem Changeset in dem ich die Bushaltestellen weiter oben bearbeitet habe auch schon mal vorbereitet, mich dann aber dagegen entschieden das hochzuladen, weil der Radweg dort ja auch nicht wirklich baulich getrennt ist sondern nur Farbe.
gr4yweb (2024-07-02 18:25:37+00:00): So, ich hab das mal korrigiert, siehe Changeset #153468562
skfd (2025-02-11 17:38:34+00:00): I think there is a duplicate squares. I feel this one is probably mapped more correctly -- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1105575638
whb_revert (2024-06-28 18:39:35+00:00): This changeset reverts changeset 153161993, 153161996, 153161997, 153161998, 153161999, 153162000, 153162001, 153162002, 153162003, 153162005, 153162006, 153162007, 153162008, 153162010, 153162011, 153162012, 153162013, 153162016, 153162018, 153162019, 153162021, 153162023, 153162024, 153162025, 153162026, 153162028, 153162030.
Barroszt (2024-06-28 21:03:45+00:00): Nazwy ulic bez imion i poprawa przebiegu ulic w Krotoszynie i okolicznych miejscowościach.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-07-01 06:24:25+00:00): ale to jest w Kazachstanie
emersonveenstra (2024-06-29 14:31:01+00:00): Hi there,

You added https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1297157334 with no tags, could you go back and tag it? Thanks!
Andrea Musuruane (2024-07-15 15:17:25+00:00): Ciao. I nomi in OSM si inseriscono senza abbreviazioni. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153307658
mangerlahn (2024-07-17 08:10:33+00:00): Danke für den Edit!

Die Buchhandlung ist allerdings schon eingetragen:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149580152

Ich würde den doppelten Eintrag dann wieder löschen?
NicaTopo (2024-06-28 23:14:48+00:00): Amine,
Please square out your buildings and match exactly the satellite imagery.
I'm going to revert your changesets.
marc__marc (2024-09-29 01:24:55+00:00): Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12018433256
what are you willing to describe ?
This node doesn't have any main tag.
Regards,
Marc
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-31 15:18:05+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12018433276/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop?
MapleTrees (2025-03-31 17:40:42+00:00): It is a shop. It is a juicery. I'm not sure what category is most appropriate for that though.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-31 18:15:17+00:00): would https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dbeverages fit?
MapleTrees (2025-04-01 14:11:44+00:00): I don't think so. From the wiki page it looks like it's selling pre bottled or pre-made drinks. This is selling drinks made to order. They blend it right there. It's like a jamba juice but with juice instead of smoothies
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-01 17:29:30+00:00): maybe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Juice_bar would fit?
MapleTrees (2025-04-01 19:00:38+00:00): That would be perfect!
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-01 20:06:01+00:00): retagged

rare tag, not supported widely for now - but definitely better than amenity=fixme
whb_revert (2024-06-28 19:44:50+00:00): This changeset reverts changeset 153161988, 153161989, 153161990, 153161991.
NicaTopo (2024-06-28 22:46:53+00:00): Hi Hormorlah,
building shapes should be generally square. You can square building in iD by selecting them and pressing the "Q" key.
Please create square shapes, I can't correct them all and need to delete them.

Thanks.
Leo Slager (2024-06-29 09:55:10+00:00): De routerelaties serie 600, 1800 zijn overeenkomstig aangepast.
NicaTopo (2024-06-28 22:51:34+00:00): Hi Hormolorlah,
As said before, please make nice rectangle buildings. Square them out.
Thanks.
Something B (2025-12-13 15:22:44+00:00): Hi, DANART!
natural=coastline;bare_rock shouldn't be used. Use natural=bare_rock such areas.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/809319486
Best regards,
Something B.
tyfi (2024-06-28 20:12:41+00:00): inconsistent*
trial (2026-02-11 18:34:17+00:00): La version 1 était encore mieux concernant le nom (pas de nom, donc pas d'accent oublie^).  Le point d'intérêt est tagué comme point à côté et c'est bien ainsi.
whb_revert (2024-06-28 20:44:28+00:00): This changeset reverts changeset 153161982, 153161983, 153161984, 153161986.
SomeoneElse (2024-06-28 21:02:16+00:00): Hello,
It'd be great to have a bit more of a description than "minor updates":)
Cheers.
Andy
math1985f (2024-06-28 21:03:47+00:00): Comment
Endres Pelka (2024-06-29 00:03:17+00:00): What's the purpose of your edit?
Leo Slager (2024-06-29 10:21:19+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
McPomHH (2024-06-29 07:08:10+00:00): Ich bin mir nicht sicher, was du mit der Linie 1 gemacht hast - aber beide Richtungen waren heute morgen kaputt.
MatthiasMatthias (2024-07-01 19:36:39+00:00): ach schiete, da brauche ich anscheinend noch einmal Nachhilfe. Jetzt sieht es aber in Ordnung aus, konntest du die Relationen retten? Und du weißt nicht, was genau der Fehler war?
pitfire (2024-06-29 03:20:15+00:00): Hallo huehnertod,
danke für Deine Beiträge, aber was verbirgt sich hinter dem "Weg: 1297187900" mit area=yes & level=-1.
Der Schlüssel level bezeichnet in Gebäuden das Stockwerk.
Hier gibt es nach meiner Kenntnis lediglich eine Geländevertiefung, als kleinräumige Strukturen der Landoberfläche aber kein unterirdische Gebäudestruktur.
VG
huehnertod (2024-06-30 15:04:29+00:00): Hallo, 

ja, ich weiß. War irgendwie unfertig gespeichert.  
Dort ist einfach eine Vertiefung zu der ich erstmal keinen sinnvollen Tag gefunden hab. Früher verlief mal ein Trampelpfad  da durch und ein Kreuz gab es dort wohl auch mal. natural=sinkhole passt nicht so richtig und cutting ist nur für Linien und nicht für Flächen. Hast Du eine Idee?
VG
pitfire (2024-07-01 04:16:16+00:00): Möglicherweise handelt es sich um "DE:Tag:historic=bomb_crater". Gerade im Umfeld Overath ein häufiger Grund für derartige Geländevertiefungen. Die findest Du auch unterhalb von Höderath in der Talsenke. Mangels Nachweisbarkeit aber auch nicht in der Historie erfasst. https://taginfo.geofabrik.de/europe:germany/tags/historic=bomb_crater#wiki
Ich würde daher keinen Eintrag empfehlen. 
VG
d3mol3k (2024-07-01 19:14:51+00:00): na czym polega ta Twoja zmiana torowiska na Sosabowskiego - bo widze że teraz po niej są tam dwa tory tramwajowe po stronie SPA Klonowica jeden jako oddzielny ( i niech cię matka boska broni przed jego usunięciem) i drugi który wpisałeś w drogę serwisową dla autobusów pod nim ( tym pierwszym)
EP_Repair (2024-09-19 16:12:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 156828449 where the changeset comment is: Reverting speed limit changes that were not field verified and have never been posted on the beltways
une abeille (2024-06-29 02:17:01+00:00): Ce changement a indroduit un error de géométrie. Je l'ai corrigé.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153315409
martinst (2024-07-01 12:48:10+00:00): Bei Way 1297190098 sollte wohl building=yes stehen.
Schramme (2024-07-01 13:51:48+00:00): Hi. Klar. Hab ich übersehen und ergänzt. Danke.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-06-28 22:10:36+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12018640314
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12018640315

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2024-06-28 22:20:44+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12018641149

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2024-06-28 22:20:44+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12018596338

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
emersonveenstra (2024-07-01 10:54:11+00:00): Hi there,

You created https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1297191048 with no tags, could you please go back and tag it? Thanks!
NorthCrab_upload (2024-06-28 22:20:45+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Azaliowa":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12018642437
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12018642438
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12018642439
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12018642440

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
emersonveenstra (2024-06-28 23:41:25+00:00): HI there,

I'm not sure you intended for this to be a lock gate (what boats use https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway=lock%20gate?uselang=en) https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12018631871. You probably wanted barrier=gate + locked=yes, or something similar
nwagers (2024-06-28 23:56:00+00:00): Thanks for catching that! I didn't even think about locks on waterways. I will adjust.
une abeille (2024-06-29 02:13:07+00:00): Quel type de problème? On a utilisé les crossings de vélo partout à la carte sans problème. Ça ne fait pas de sens de le changer. Maintenant il manque d'information.
rskedgell (2024-06-29 05:56:50+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I have removed the public right of way (PRoW) tags from your informal path edge diversion.

Lambourne FP11 follows the route across the field which is clearly visible in the Bing aerial imagery and in the Essex County Council PRoW GIS data.

https://osm.mathmos.net/prow/progress/essex/epping-forest/lambourne/
JassKurn (2024-06-29 14:55:42+00:00): Hi rskedgell,

I think it is wrong to make the changes you did based on the data you used.

Ihorner2, did state the route had been changed, suggesting knowledge of a change.

PRoW routes change and many are being diverted around field edges. The available digital definitive maps take time to update.

If it has been changed there must be an Order, and it will published on the appropriate authorities website.

A quick search shows there is an Order that reroutes this Footpath. Made on the 8th February 2024, so came into effect on the 7th March 2024.

https://www.essexhighways.org/getting-around/public-rights-of-way/public-path-notices
rskedgell (2024-06-29 19:57:02+00:00): My apologies, reverted.
EP_Repair (2024-09-19 16:12:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 156828449 where the changeset comment is: Reverting speed limit changes that were not field verified and have never been posted on the beltways
CurlingMan13 (2024-07-01 05:13:49+00:00): Access tags should be used in lieu of deletion.  Changeset reverted.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153313365
2strokeoritsajoke (2024-07-02 04:29:22+00:00): That is stupid this is literally private property! Do you let people walk into your backyard?
ElliottPlack (2024-09-19 14:20:58+00:00): Hi there, Elliott here with the OSMF Data Working Group. How exactly was this speed limit field verified? According to the Maryland SHA, the entire beltway is 55 MPH: https://data-maryland.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/maryland::mdot-sha-roadway-posted-speed-limit-signs/about

Additionally much of this area is under a speed limit reduction for a temporary work zone, where speeds are dropped lower than 55 during construction.

In other changesets you've set the DC beltway to 70 MPH yet it is also 55. Why did you do this?
Xvtn (2024-07-06 23:46:02+00:00): Really sad that MayMoe's closed. :(
5m4u9 (2024-06-29 17:21:38+00:00): Hola, gracias por esta y las otras ediciones.

Me puedes dar tu opinión sobre la experiencia de mapear con la app every door? para recomendar a otras personas...
InsertUser (2024-07-03 21:58:54+00:00): What is your source for this edit?
pitscheplatsch (2024-07-02 05:51:27+00:00): Just a test?
Peter651 (2024-07-19 08:49:32+00:00): Tracks/roads like Abano Pass are generally classified as tertiary or even secondary roads (eg. Zhinvali-Barisakho-Shatili, Zagari pass)
Curious as to why the part after the pass would be a tertiary road and the pass itself not? 
It would be a change in general mapping practice in Georgia to classify this as track...?
tyfi (2024-06-29 02:44:34+00:00): Related to note #4312053
Leo Slager (2024-06-29 10:15:38+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Leo Slager (2024-06-29 10:17:54+00:00): feedback:
volgens de website verhuizen ze deze week.
Verzorg je die wijziging ook zelf ?
zzptichka (2024-06-29 17:25:21+00:00): Hi,

When improving existing features, like buildings, please don't delete existing data. Like in this case you deleted an existing school with address information. It's important for routing/geo location apps.

Also, if you want it to have various levels in one building, use`building:part` tag: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:part
ChaseTheChurro (2024-06-29 23:46:54+00:00): Hey there, I appreciate the feedback however the data on the buildings was removed as it already exists and is a duplicate of the landuse area around it. I noticed that a lot of schools in the area (and also around the world) only list the data under the landuse area and then just leave the buildings as school buildings (if this is wrong please feel free to let me know). As for the building layers themselves there are two reasons I have done it this way, 1 - it looks better in 3d renderers as they typically don't show building parts the same way they do buildings, and  2 - I'm a local and as far as I'm aware the building is divided into a few parts in real life as it isn't all used just for the elementary school (note the additional tag for the nursery school for example)
zzptichka (2024-06-30 00:08:00+00:00): Yeah actually I just checked with the wiki and you are right, the name duplication should be avoided: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:amenity%3Dschool

My concern was that if you build a route to that school in a routing app, it could route you to a landuse corner that's far away from the actual entrance. But I guess today's routing engines are smarter that that and adding "entraince=main" node should handle that.

As for mapping for the renderer, it's considered to be a bad practice and is frowned upon: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer

OSM Data Working Group often reverts such edits.
ChaseTheChurro (2024-06-30 00:26:16+00:00): Oh okay good to know, this was the first building I added with the intention to map for the renderer, I will not continue that in the future and only map to add more data and detail as I have been doing
ChaseTheChurro (2024-06-30 00:33:09+00:00): ...I'll add a note as well on the building(s) that a main entrance as well as other entrances have been specified and that the building is divided the way it is as there is more than just the main elementary school
Leo Slager (2024-06-29 10:20:31+00:00): Tip:
Je kunt dat nog aanvullen met religion=
en denomination=
Zie ook de wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dplace_of_worship
whb_revert (2024-06-29 03:36:30+00:00): This changeset reverts changeset 153076534, 153158411, 153158412, 153158414, 153159579, 153159581, 153159583, 153159585, 153161971, 153161974, 153161976, 153161978, 153161979, 153161980.
tyfi (2024-06-29 03:31:03+00:00): I didn't add SGT EDWARD FORREST JR - ARMY Heroes Way to name since it doesn't quite make sense in my opinion. I'm not sure how it's supposed to be rendered into a name. I'll have to see a sign for it I guess
Nathan_A_RF (2024-07-15 21:45:18+00:00): A reminder that 'maxspeed:type=GB:zone30' is not a valid tag
jeslop (2024-06-29 11:04:59+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153327331
felipeeugenio (2024-06-29 13:29:10+00:00): Hola. Las casas o edificios se mapean según la estructura de la construcción misma en su base. No es recinto completo. Y por favor no pegar las casas a las vías.

Saludos
aTarom (2024-06-29 07:17:49+00:00): De nuevo modificando el multivalor? se dieron todas las explicaciones en este hilo,
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/usuarios-editando-en-espana-bajo-sospecha-vandalismo-malas-practicas-y-otros/2510/36
saltarse los bloqueos con cuentas marioneta no va a mejorar la situación para nadie
AngocA (2024-07-20 04:10:51+00:00): Hola Benjamin.

Veo que estuviste en una mapathon en la zona de La Macarena. Sin embargo, pero r'ios en paralelo como estos: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1297257045/history

Por qué están dibujados así?

Cordialmente,


Andrés Gómez
jeslop (2024-06-29 11:02:13+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153327227
jeslop (2024-06-29 11:02:14+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153327227
jeslop (2024-06-29 11:02:15+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153327227
Meinew (2024-06-29 17:14:48+00:00): Bonjour, merci pour votre contribution!
Le ruisseau passe sous des ponts et non dans des tuyaux ou par des gués (c'est corrigé) et au nord ouest, le chemin était tag "pont".
Ironden (2024-06-30 04:45:34+00:00): Bonjour, merci pour vos corrections! C'était ma 1ère contribution :-) mais je vais essayer de m'améliorer (ponts vs tuyaux/gués) pour les suivantes ;-).
Meinew (2024-06-30 08:11:33+00:00): Pour une première contribution, c'est très bien ! (la cartographie des ponts et des cours d'eau est assez complexe)
Bonne continuation !
Meinew (2024-06-29 16:09:38+00:00): Bonjour,
J'ai regardé votre changeset : merci pour votre contribution ! 

N’hésitez à fusionner les chemins et à créer des connexions (la partie dans la foret).
Le chemin avait l'attribut "layer=1", qui ne me semble pas nécessaire.
La fin sur la gauche traversait aussi une maison.

Si jamais vous habitez la région et que vous connaissez le nom de l'impasse qui croise le chemin, ce serait un plus.
Ironden (2024-06-30 04:48:39+00:00): Merci pour ces conseils avisés ; je vais regarder cela (fusion, connexion, attribut layer). J'habite à qq kms donc je vais aller voir si l'impasse est nommée ...
Meinew (2024-06-30 08:08:38+00:00): Bonne carto ! :)
Andrea Musuruane (2024-06-30 15:11:19+00:00): Ciao. In Italia il numero civico è il numero che contraddistingue l'accesso esterno che dall’area di circolazione (strada, piazza, via, ecc) immette direttamente o indirettamente alle unità immobiliari (abitazioni, esercizi commerciali, uffici, garage, ecc.) o alle aree recintate non edificate (es. stabilimenti balneari). Non è quindi corretto associare i tag addr:* ad un edificio. Bisogna quindi inserire un nodo in corrispondenza dell'accesso dove si trova la targhetta ed etichettalo opportunamente. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Addresses#Regole_specifiche_per_l'Italia Ciao, Andrea
Đuro Jiří (2024-07-05 17:17:58+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11999130792
Corretto
catdreamer (2024-10-20 12:10:18+00:00): 標示的倒吊蓮山，在等高線地圖上看根本就不符合山頭的定義，不宜強加山名標示
Edison Wen (2024-10-20 14:48:45+00:00): 謝謝前輩指正，未來會更謹慎處理
Константин Гам (2024-10-16 09:55:16+00:00): Здравствуйте! Вы присвоили название не магазину, а зданию. Магазин уже отмечен и виден на всех картах, так что дублировать название не требуется.
phoenixsaigon1698 (2024-07-01 08:08:25+00:00): Bạn ơi, trong edit này của bạn, bạn split road ra nhiều quá dẫn đến các turn restriction nó không kết nối tốt từ from-via-to 15992190, 15992191...
phoenixsaigon1698 (2024-07-01 08:12:34+00:00): Nếu bạn add chiều cao thì bạn add luôn cho 1 đoạn dài cũng được vì bản chất xe đâu phải đi tới cái cầu vượt đi bộ mới limit chiều cao.
Leo Slager (2024-06-29 10:31:30+00:00): please use a local account ?
So that these changesets do not appear in the Netherlands community.

Kind regards
Leo
rskedgell (2024-06-30 06:51:35+00:00): Reverted, see discussion in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153312735
woodpeck_repair (2024-07-28 09:34:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 154512232 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism by tmapsme, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16504
Andrea Musuruane (2024-06-30 15:06:46+00:00): Ciao. In Italia il numero civico è il numero che contraddistingue l'accesso esterno che dall’area di circolazione (strada, piazza, via, ecc) immette direttamente o indirettamente alle unità immobiliari (abitazioni, esercizi commerciali, uffici, garage, ecc.) o alle aree recintate non edificate (es. stabilimenti balneari). Non è quindi corretto associare i tag addr:* ad un edificio. Bisogna quindi inserire un nodo in corrispondenza dell'accesso dove si trova la targhetta ed etichettalo opportunamente. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Addresses#Regole_specifiche_per_l'Italia Ciao, Andrea
AlkalIn (2024-07-03 16:51:10+00:00): Dear chiogo junior,
It seems the relation 10776809 has been broken after your edits.
See history here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10776809/history#map=12/3.6619/11.1188
Please can you have a look?
Best,
Alkalin
Filip009 (2025-09-02 12:52:33+00:00): Zdravím, patria takéto "raz ročne" eventy do OSM? https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153320208