piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Gregory Peony (2025-12-04 18:24:16+00:00): It looks like you both appropriately and inappropriately copy and pasted footprints here. I recommend doing this if the buildings truly have the same geometry e.g. the row of metal roofed buildings in the Southern cluster. However some other footprints are oversized becasue of this.

Thank you for your contribution! 

When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom out to obtain the orientation and shape, then zoom in so that you can accurately draw the footprint. Exclude shadows and yards when tracing the footprint. Keep in mind that you are looking at the [roofs of buildings](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape#Roof_shape), but mapping their footprints. Depending on how the scene is lit, pitched roofs may have light and dark sections that belong to one building. Generally pitched roofs overhang the walls of a building, so a footprint slightly smaller than the roof is accurate. You can scale selected features in ID with `shift+(-/+)`, or JOSM with `ctrl.+alt+Lclick & drag`.  Take care to make contributions that others can build upon.

Keep on mapping!
Gregory Peony (2025-12-04 18:14:12+00:00): The footprints you mapped here represent buildings, but you created invalid shared nodes while doing so. 

Thank you for your contribution! 

Please do not connect the corners of buildings to other buildings or features such as highways or residential areas. In the iD Editor, hold down the `Alt` key to prevent your cursor from snapping to existing data and accidentally creating shared(grey) nodes. This [video about connected nodes](https://youtu.be/ltn1VOiq5_0) has more information and a guide.

Keep on mapping!

Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175504292
Gregory Peony (2025-12-04 18:10:17+00:00): All footprints you mapped here represent buildings. You did an excellent job working with the existing data by deleting the footprints which you could tell represented no longer existing buildings, while preserving the one that you were able to identify in the imagery. Well done!

Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175504300
ilias_ (2025-12-04 19:52:41+00:00): Tip for the future: when mapping squared buildings like these, select each building and click Q. This makes the buildings look nice and squared. Welcome to OSM!
Gregory Peony (2025-12-04 18:01:25+00:00): Good attempt at mapping this partially obscured building. I do not think it is as big as you've mapped it though. Look at the paths in the imagery and note how they would overlap this building, if it were in fact so large. See how I mapped it in https://osmcha.org/changesets/175510032

Thank you for your contribution! 

Sometimes features are obscured by others in imagery e.g. tall buildings, vegetation, shadows, or clouds. Sometimes using another imagery source in these instances can allow you to view the feature of interest directly. Our goal is to map the ground truth accurately, so if the feature is obscured in all available sources, then use what you can see (and other map data) to estimate its shape, size, position and orientation. Think about what space is already occupied by other features e.g. Consider where a tree's trunk meets the ground.

Keep on mapping!
Gregory Peony (2025-12-04 17:51:31+00:00): Why did you delete these footprints? If you delete a fair number of features its good to provide your rationale in a changeset comment so others know why you did something.

Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175504358
Gregory Peony (2025-12-04 17:42:09+00:00): Hi, the footprints you mapped here represent buildings, but I see 3 main mistakes. 

1. they could be more accurate. 

2. they haven't been squared.

3. You created invalid shared nodes.

The following feedback may seem quite long, but it will help you address all the problems listed.

Thank you for your contribution! 

Each footprint should represent a building. Please watch [this video about imagery interpretation](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJ-vUwtS3A8). Sometimes buildings may appear to share a common wall, but this is sometimes an illusion; only map them with shared nodes if you have reason to believe that they really do touch.

When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom out to obtain the orientation and shape, then zoom in so that you can accurately draw the footprint. Exclude shadows and yards when tracing the footprint. Keep in mind that you are looking at the [roofs of buildings](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape#Roof_shape), but mapping their footprints. Depending on how the scene is lit, pitched roofs may have light and dark sections that belong to one building. Generally pitched roofs overhang the walls of a building, so a footprint slightly smaller than the roof is accurate. You can scale selected features in ID with `shift+(-/+)`, or JOSM with `ctrl.+alt+Lclick & drag`.  Take care to make contributions that others can build upon.

Please do not connect the corners of buildings to other buildings or features such as highways or residential areas. In the iD Editor, hold down the `Alt` key to prevent your cursor from snapping to existing data and accidentally creating shared(grey) nodes. This [video about connected nodes](https://youtu.be/ltn1VOiq5_0) has more information and a guide.

After tracing and tagging features which are likely square or round, please remember to square their corners `q`, or circularise them `o`, because it is almost impossible and time consuming to draw shapes so percisely manually. Buildings with metal or pitched roofs tend to have square corners; round buildings are identifiable by the distinctive cresent shaped shadow they cast. Unless the building is clearly a different shape then it's best to assume that it should be rounded or its corners should be squared. In the ID Editor, you can `right click` for access to editing functions. Since roofs tend to overhang walls trace the initial shape slightly smaller to allow a buffer for any change in size which may occur. In JOSM use the [buildingstools plugin](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/BuildingsTools). In ID you must draw the shape accurately enough if you want every corner to be squared. This [video about squaring features in ID](https://youtu.be/Xs5wX592E1o) has more information and a demo.

Keep on mapping!
mbela (2025-12-04 18:47:14+00:00): This update should be added as an 'alt_name', rather than the change of the 'name' or 'name:en'.
Gregory Peony (2025-12-04 17:13:46+00:00): All but one footprint here appear valid. The other I would map as two seperate buildings. Please regularise the shapes after tagging when appropriate.

Thank you for your contribution! 

After tracing and tagging features which are likely square or round, please remember to square their corners `q`, or circularise them `o`, because it is almost impossible and time consuming to draw shapes so percisely manually. Buildings with metal or pitched roofs tend to have square corners; round buildings are identifiable by the distinctive cresent shaped shadow they cast. Unless the building is clearly a different shape then it's best to assume that it should be rounded or its corners should be squared. In the ID Editor, you can `right click` for access to editing functions. Since roofs tend to overhang walls trace the initial shape slightly smaller to allow a buffer for any change in size which may occur. In JOSM use the [buildingstools plugin](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/BuildingsTools). In ID you must draw the shape accurately enough if you want every corner to be squared. This [video about squaring features in ID](https://youtu.be/Xs5wX592E1o) has more information and a demo.

Keep on mapping!
Gregory Peony (2025-12-04 17:19:05+00:00): All footprints represent buildings. I would have mapped the round footprints as square in this case. It looks like on occasion you enveloped multiple buildings with one footprint. some footprints here are oversized.

Thank you for your contribution! 

Each footprint should represent a building. Please watch [this video about imagery interpretation](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJ-vUwtS3A8). Sometimes buildings may appear to share a common wall, but this is sometimes an illusion; only map them with shared nodes if you have reason to believe that they really do touch.

When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom out to obtain the orientation and shape, then zoom in so that you can accurately draw the footprint. Exclude shadows and yards when tracing the footprint. Keep in mind that you are looking at the [roofs of buildings](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape#Roof_shape), but mapping their footprints. Depending on how the scene is lit, pitched roofs may have light and dark sections that belong to one building. Generally pitched roofs overhang the walls of a building, so a footprint slightly smaller than the roof is accurate. You can scale selected features in ID with `shift+(-/+)`, or JOSM with `ctrl.+alt+Lclick & drag`.  Take care to make contributions that others can build upon.

Keep on mapping!
Gregory Peony (2025-12-04 17:10:21+00:00): All footpritns here represent buildings accurately, if they were ever so slightly smaller they'd be as accurate as the imagery allows. 

Thank you for your contribution! 

When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom out to obtain the orientation and shape, then zoom in so that you can accurately draw the footprint. Exclude shadows and yards when tracing the footprint. Keep in mind that you are looking at the [roofs of buildings](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape#Roof_shape), but mapping their footprints. Depending on how the scene is lit, pitched roofs may have light and dark sections that belong to one building. Generally pitched roofs overhang the walls of a building, so a footprint slightly smaller than the roof is accurate. You can scale selected features in ID with `shift+(-/+)`, or JOSM with `ctrl.+alt+Lclick & drag`.  Take care to make contributions that others can build upon.

Keep on mapping!
Gregory Peony (2025-12-04 17:05:10+00:00): All footprints represent buildings, but could be more accurate. It looks like you enveloped multiple buildings with individual footprints.

Thank you for your contribution! 

Each footprint should represent a building. Please watch [this video about imagery interpretation](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJ-vUwtS3A8). Sometimes buildings may appear to share a common wall, but this is sometimes an illusion; only map them with shared nodes if you have reason to believe that they really do touch.

When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom out to obtain the orientation and shape, then zoom in so that you can accurately draw the footprint. Exclude shadows and yards when tracing the footprint. Keep in mind that you are looking at the [roofs of buildings](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape#Roof_shape), but mapping their footprints. Depending on how the scene is lit, pitched roofs may have light and dark sections that belong to one building. Generally pitched roofs overhang the walls of a building, so a footprint slightly smaller than the roof is accurate. You can scale selected features in ID with `shift+(-/+)`, or JOSM with `ctrl.+alt+Lclick & drag`.  Take care to make contributions that others can build upon.

Keep on mapping!
Gregory Peony (2025-12-04 17:01:59+00:00): All footprints you added here represent buildings, please take care to exclude the shadows cast on the ground and regularise the shapes after tagging.

Thank you for your contribution! 

When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom out to obtain the orientation and shape, then zoom in so that you can accurately draw the footprint. Exclude shadows and yards when tracing the footprint. Keep in mind that you are looking at the [roofs of buildings](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape#Roof_shape), but mapping their footprints. Depending on how the scene is lit, pitched roofs may have light and dark sections that belong to one building. Generally pitched roofs overhang the walls of a building, so a footprint slightly smaller than the roof is accurate. You can scale selected features in ID with `shift+(-/+)`, or JOSM with `ctrl.+alt+Lclick & drag`.  Take care to make contributions that others can build upon.

After tracing and tagging features which are likely square or round, please remember to square their corners `q`, or circularise them `o`, because it is almost impossible and time consuming to draw shapes so percisely manually. Buildings with metal or pitched roofs tend to have square corners; round buildings are identifiable by the distinctive cresent shaped shadow they cast. Unless the building is clearly a different shape then it's best to assume that it should be rounded or its corners should be squared. In the ID Editor, you can `right click` for access to editing functions. Since roofs tend to overhang walls trace the initial shape slightly smaller to allow a buffer for any change in size which may occur. In JOSM use the [buildingstools plugin](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/BuildingsTools). In ID you must draw the shape accurately enough if you want every corner to be squared. This [video about squaring features in ID](https://youtu.be/Xs5wX592E1o) has more information and a demo.

Keep on mapping!
Gregory Peony (2025-12-04 16:51:08+00:00): The footpritns I flagged appear to have been moved to represent different buildings than they originally did.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175504443
Gregory Peony (2025-12-04 16:39:56+00:00): All footprints you added here represent buildings in the imagery, but please take care to not include the shadows cast on the ground in the size of footprints.

Thank you for your contribution! 

When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom out to obtain the orientation and shape, then zoom in so that you can accurately draw the footprint. Exclude shadows and yards when tracing the footprint. Keep in mind that you are looking at the [roofs of buildings](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape#Roof_shape), but mapping their footprints. Depending on how the scene is lit, pitched roofs may have light and dark sections that belong to one building. Generally pitched roofs overhang the walls of a building, so a footprint slightly smaller than the roof is accurate. You can scale selected features in ID with `shift+(-/+)`, or JOSM with `ctrl.+alt+Lclick & drag`.  Take care to make contributions that others can build upon.

Keep on mapping!
Gregory Peony (2025-12-04 16:38:15+00:00): All footpritns here look valid but the NE one is oversized.

Thank you for your contribution! 

When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom out to obtain the orientation and shape, then zoom in so that you can accurately draw the footprint. Exclude shadows and yards when tracing the footprint. Keep in mind that you are looking at the [roofs of buildings](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape#Roof_shape), but mapping their footprints. Depending on how the scene is lit, pitched roofs may have light and dark sections that belong to one building. Generally pitched roofs overhang the walls of a building, so a footprint slightly smaller than the roof is accurate. You can scale selected features in ID with `shift+(-/+)`, or JOSM with `ctrl.+alt+Lclick & drag`.  Take care to make contributions that others can build upon.

Keep on mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175504463
jhaluska80 (2025-12-04 23:19:01+00:00): The Q key will auto square building corners for you.  It'll help you make nicer looking buildings.
Gregory Peony (2025-12-04 16:47:39+00:00): The vast makority of footprints here represent buildings, but some could be more accurate. Here Bing happens to show the same scene as ESRI so you could align Bing to ESRI and map using it when that's the case.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175504471
Gregory Peony (2025-12-04 16:47:47+00:00): The vast makority of footprints here represent buildings, but some could be more accurate. Here Bing happens to show the same scene as ESRI so you could align Bing to ESRI and map using it when that's the case.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175504471
Gregory Peony (2025-12-04 16:47:48+00:00): The vast makority of footprints here represent buildings, but some could be more accurate. Here Bing happens to show the same scene as ESRI so you could align Bing to ESRI and map using it when that's the case.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175504471
Gregory Peony (2025-12-04 16:36:59+00:00): Thank you for taking care to preserve the history, however take care not to mix it either. Deletions are appropriate if the feature either has ceased to or has never existed. Cross-reference bing and see that some buildings no longer exist and should be deleted.

I haven't analysed it myself, but just note that the instructions recommend offsetting the imagery rather than moving data in this project.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history#Don't_mix_the_history
Tomas Straupis (2025-12-05 07:48:09+00:00): Hello. Thank you for you interest and effort, but you're adding quite a number of duplicate objects, removing correct information, destroying good website links etc. We have quite some work to fix after you. For example here you've created two duplicates of Gediminas tower.
Lusze (2025-12-05 12:47:46+00:00): Hello, thank you for your comment, but could you elaborate on your criticism and the amount of work I would have caused?
I understand that it was unnecessary to create separate nodes for museums for Gediminas Tower, The Bastion and Palace of the Grand Dukes. My intention was to add the opening hours. But beyond that, I mainly added the German names for museums and sights and updated their opening hours. The links to the websites often did not work because the Lithuanian National Museum has redesigned its site (see, for example, the old link to the Old Arsenal). In such cases, I prefer to use links to the main organisation, as otherwise they lead nowhere whenever the website is redesigned or the language on the website is changed. The foundation of the former church of St. Anne and St. Barbara was mapped as a pedestrian zone, which I correctly changed to a wall.
Tomas Straupis (2025-12-05 12:54:09+00:00): German names are all fine, but problem was with creating duplicate objects (points), in case of Gediminas tower you've also taken one part of a 3D building, changed it from building:part to building (thus making also an overlapping building) and created a third object for the same thing. Now if link does not work, you can either simply fix the links (which I did), or leave them for local mappers to fix - it is usually pretty easy to trace the new url. And yes, larger part of your changeset was good and useful, thank you!
Comino (2025-12-04 16:43:41+00:00): Advertising is not allowed on OSM.
description-tag deleted.

Detail-tag does not exist.
Tag deleted.
Gregory Peony (2025-12-04 16:59:19+00:00): You identified and mapped buildings just map them slightly smaller than the roof you see in future.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175505668
Comino (2025-12-04 16:46:56+00:00): Detail-tag does not exist.
Tag deleted.

Wrong opening hours syntax.
Fixed

Added two extra tags.
clnd (2026-02-10 22:08:43+00:00): I feel like the tagging for the building itself should be different, as some map compilers will show this as a current station even though it is completely disconnected from the mainline.
jacobwhall (2026-02-11 08:42:46+00:00): Which "map compilers" are you referring to, @clnd?

Please review the Wiki page for the `building=*` tag, which makes clear:

> the value may be used to classify the (architectural) type of building. Note that it may be not the same as the building's current use

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building
letsridebikes (2025-12-05 00:14:52+00:00): Why are you still doing this? You've been asked so many times to stop
SomeoneElse (2026-01-06 22:41:03+00:00): Hello,
Andy from the DWG here again (as also in https://osm.org/changeset/139049543 ).  The best way of tagging this is "highway=footway; footway=sidewalk".  If you do that you don't need to worry about what it is a path for, so you don't need to add an explicit "access=no" tag to stop people driving on it.
Tagging of this sort of thing is being discussed on the UK forum; see e.g. at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/odd-access-no-tagging-of-uk-public-rights-of-way/132798 .  I'd definitely suggest putting forward your point of view there.
Dimacn (2026-02-03 16:51:19+00:00): Я отменил данный пакет правок, из-за спама в тегах и добавления несуществующего объекта.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-04 17:28:18+00:00): thanks, will add to my list of index of unexpected valid combinations
NeisBot (2025-12-13 22:20:03+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Plumbing and HVAC services in Westwood NJ"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-12-13 22:47:04+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/175512642
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-24 13:03:21+00:00): Cleaned up remaining SEO spam and other tagging for POI in changeset 184522874

https://osm.org/changeset/184522874
ilias_ (2025-12-04 19:54:20+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM. These buildings where already mapped, no need to add another one on top of them.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175515617
yelisey90 (2025-12-05 07:45:25+00:00): reverted - not all Bank of Georgia branches are branded as Solo, iD validation is faulty

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175535402