piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2025-12-09 20:47:53+00:00): De brug heb ik uit z'n isolement gehaald.
habi (2025-12-09 12:05:44+00:00): https://qa.poole.ch/addresses/GWR/351_all.osm.zip and https://qa.poole.ch/addresses/ch/missing/351.geojson, too...
aTarom (2025-12-10 20:06:29+00:00): Hola, se ha quedado esta way sin asignarle el tipo de highway
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1457121160/history
es quizás un "path"?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpath
Saludos
Tonín (2025-12-10 21:07:41+00:00): Gracias por tu comentario. Lo he marcado como senda. Se trata de un recorrido entre el bosque señalizado con jitos de piedras y marcas amarillas. Espero haber subido bien el cambio. No tengo experiencia en esto.
Tonín (2025-12-10 21:15:45+00:00): Marcado como "sendero peatonal"
Dimitar155 (2025-12-11 22:12:13+00:00): По принцип това са лостове за тупане на килими. Не че съм виждал някой да ги използва по предназначение, но все пак да споделя че и за тях имаме таг :)

man_made=carpet_hanger
Anonymous36863 (2025-12-12 08:27:41+00:00): Не мисля, че са само за килими. Дори и да са, те имат само един хоризонтален лост, а не два като на снимката, което ги прави по-полезни за спортистите. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Trzepa.JPG
Dimitar155 (2025-12-12 08:44:59+00:00): Снимката е илюстративна. При нас са предимно с един лост отгоре и са се ползвали точно за тупане на килими и черги.

https://sk.wikipedia.org/wiki/Súbor:Carpet_beater.webm
Fraxi (2025-12-12 08:46:28+00:00): Не знам на колко сте години, но лично аз съм виждал да се тупат килими по такива лостове, а май и аз веднъж бях тупал :) Такива навярно има из целия бивш Източен блок. Примера със снимката от уикито, който сте дал е една разновидност. Основното им предназначение е за тупане на килими, а това, че сме се набирали е друг въпрос :)
Anonymous36863 (2025-12-12 08:56:12+00:00): Добре, но според мен, всеки хоризонтален фитнес лост става за тупане на килим, но не всеки лост за тупане на килим става за набиране.
Dimitar155 (2025-12-12 09:19:00+00:00): Ако трябва да сме обективни, има и не малко дървета които стават за катерене, но не ги отбелязваме като катерушки :)
Anonymous36863 (2025-12-12 14:52:19+00:00): Чудя се защо има лост за тупане на килими при Училището, там явно дори няма и килими.
eggie (2025-12-09 14:30:44+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-12-09 14:42:03+00:00): Je vraagt feedback.. Je zou ook het aantal verdiepingen kunnen toevoegen.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:levels


MVG
eggie
BCNorwich (2025-12-09 14:31:39+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

A few points, the house name would not be 51, that's only the house number.

In the absence of a oneway=no tag, it is implied that the road is two-way; no need for that tag. 

I've made corrections. Regards Bernard.
eggie (2025-12-09 14:32:46+00:00): Dag drDerp, Probeer als het kan concreet commentaar te leveren bij upload. Dus wat heb je hier aangepast?

MVG
eggie
pietrodelbu (2026-06-10 20:36:02+00:00): A nearby information board says that the elevation is 350 m a.s.l. but that does not match with the location elevation

Vorrei segnalare che i 350 metri riportati sul cartello all'inizio del sentiero, sono la distanza da percorrere per raggiungere la panchina e non l'altitudine come indicato su questo commento al punto di interesse. Scusate ma non so come segnalarlo in modo diverso.
NeisBot (2025-12-14 07:54:25+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Babulnath Mandir jadx astrology and ritual services"

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description
NeisReview (2025-12-16 17:24:56+00:00): 🔴 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the original contributor or remaining promotional text in description tags by https://osm.org/changeset/176016310
NeisBot (2025-12-14 07:55:06+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Babulnath Mandir"

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description
NeisReview (2025-12-16 17:25:25+00:00): ❌ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/176016310
BCNorwich (2025-12-09 14:36:28+00:00): Hi,

The garden would not be named Parkview Road, and it doesn't need the area=yes tag.

The tags should be access=private
leisure=garden.  I've made corrections.

Regards Bernard.
vasony (2025-12-14 21:14:43+00:00): Szia!

Ha már úgyis megkerested a határozatod, írd már be légyszi pontosan a számát a forrásba, ne csak a dátumot.

pl: "2025.09.18-i KT hat." helyett: "265/2025. (IX.18.) KT határozat". A xx/yyyy formában könnyebb keresni.

Köszi, Tamás
BCNorwich (2025-12-09 14:40:35+00:00): Hi, The scool sports pitch would not be named Sports Center. I've made corrections.

Regards Bernard.
mga_geo (2025-12-12 07:11:56+00:00): Bonjour,
Pour les lignes de bus, la valeur de l'attribut "network" est "FR:TUB" et non "TUB" cf configuration de l'outil PTNA: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Saint-Brieuc/Transports_en_commun/PTNA/Lignes-TUB
Pouvez-vous corriger ?
Marc
Sandonin (2025-12-13 20:03:53+00:00): Bonsoir Marc, c'est corrigé. Je vais cependant demander une modification du Name Suggestion Index qui n'est pas raccord avec PTNA.
mga_geo (2025-12-13 23:38:51+00:00): Bonjour,
Les demandes de ce type que j'ai faites à NSI ont été refusées. J'espère que la votre aboutira.
Sandonin (2025-12-15 08:52:01+00:00): Je ne comprends pas pourquoi, mais j'espère que la demande répétée, et regroupée Rennes + St Brieuc fonctionnera.
eggie (2025-12-09 14:35:34+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
rskedgell (2025-12-09 14:01:00+00:00): Corrected in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175714422

Although a previous edit changing it to a guided busway was wrong, highway=busway is the correct tagging here. It was probably mis-tagged as a guided busway and keeps getting changed to unclassified or service because those are rendered in the "default" OSM Carto map tiles and busway is not. Before changing it again, please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer

There is a lot of misunderstanding about access tags and signs.

A blue dedicated bus route sign (TSRGD diagram 953) or a no entry sign with exceptions prohibit all vehicles except those expressly permitted. That is represented by vehicle=no . If a motor vehicle (only) prohibition was intended, then a different sign would be used (diagram 619).

There is no UK traffic sign specifically allowing PSVs, so psv=yes is almost always incorrect. It's not quite a synonym for bus=yes and shouldn't be used when the signage specifically refers to buses.
BCNorwich (2025-12-09 14:42:28+00:00): This are is within an existing mapped residential area, thus it's not needed.

I've removed it.

Regards Bernard.
Andrea Musuruane (2025-12-12 13:45:38+00:00): Ho fatto revert perche' i parcheggi erano gia' segnalati sulle highway

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175847264
蕉饼电脑 (2025-12-09 23:35:24+00:00): 道路关系的名称不要加城市名
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-10 14:11:00+00:00): fajnie że parkingi mapujesz ale type=site rodzaju https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19937409 dużo nie wnosi nad https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1457134272

parametry na obszarze można dać a relacji nie trzeba robić
Sretne (2025-12-11 07:17:04+00:00): Według wiki mają być w zgrupowane w relacji: "Miejsca parkingowe zawsze muszą być zgrupowane w relacje site i oznaczone type=site + site=parking."
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparking_spac"
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-11 14:22:33+00:00): o rany, ale bubel

nie wiem czy to wadliwe tłumaczenie czy ktoś tłumaczył jak ten bubel był na angielskiej wersji

poprawiłem wiki na prawidłowe "Miejsca parkingowe mogą być zgrupowane w relacje site i oznaczone type=site + site=parking."

po angielsku było "Parking spaces may be grouped together in a site relation tagged with type=site + site=parking."
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-11 14:25:12+00:00): i wielkie wielkie gigantyczne dzięki za podanie skąd to się wzięło!

szkoda że na wiki taki bubel wisiał
finn-hound (2025-12-23 20:12:06+00:00): Hello. I noticed you have added residential areas as your first edit. Some of these do not appear to be properly named (based on the corresponding road names), and the areas you have added overlap existing ones. Please do not overlap residential areas (landuse=residential). The roads within them have already been named, so the area names feel redundant unless they are genuinely known as these locally (that is for you to decide.)

Because of this, I have taken the decision to revert your changeset. Thank you for understanding.
rskedgell (2025-12-09 16:16:06+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The museum has already been added to OSM, but only 2 months ago: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13256051041
Roydon Olive (2025-12-10 11:08:08+00:00): oneway=no is correct for this street, why remove it?
eggie (2025-12-09 14:45:45+00:00): Hi Mateusz   You created a tunnel? 
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=175714012
Greetz
eggie
eggie (2025-12-09 14:46:53+00:00): I removed the tunnel
Andrea Musuruane (2025-12-12 13:37:32+00:00): Ho fatto revert perche' i parcheggi erano gia' segnalati sulle highway

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175846861
eggie (2025-12-09 14:59:35+00:00): Dag WB,
Dit is inmiddels gereed dus aangepast.
https://viewer.satellietdataportaal.nl/@52.03722,4.333216,19/?datastrip=20251107_PNEO-04

Foto's zijn vaak 'outdated'. 

Gr eggie
Frans S (2025-12-09 13:46:31+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
PLease refresh your mapping and tagging skills.
Rather inaccurate mapped. Not squared.
Buildings should be tagged as building=yes
No landuse-residential. That tag is to be used to mark a settlement as residential.
Best regard
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-05-24 08:44:26+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1457141720/history - are there some kind of remains of that tracks on the ground?

anything visible at all?
Frans S (2025-12-09 14:04:41+00:00): Hello. 
See my comment on your other changeset>
 Please do not cluster buildings as well.
Best regards
14im (2025-12-13 23:36:54+00:00): Bonjour,

Bravo et merci pour vos premières contributions !

Quelques remarques à propos du changement https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175715177 : 

Les mentions "bar, tabac, presse" n'identifient pas les trois établissements que vous avez modifiés.

Pour spécifier la nature du commerce, par convention, on utilise plutôt le système de clés/valeurs documenté dans le Wiki :
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:%C3%89l%C3%A9ments_cartographiques

Par exemple, l'objet https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/65133885 qui représente le Royal a déjà toutes les informations sans devoir les faire porter dans le nom :

- "shop = newspaper" indique un marchand de journaux
- "tobbaco = yes" nous dit qu'il s'y vend du tabac
- "gambling = yes" mentionne la distribution de jeux de hasard

Par ailleurs, les dénominations que vous avez choisies ressemblent fort à celle présentes sous Google Maps.
Sachez que la license ODBL choisie par la communauté nous interdit d'utiliser, entre autres, des informations issues de Google Maps.
Cette page du Wiki en explique les risques :
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Google_Maps_user_contributions
ToniE (2025-12-09 15:39:17+00:00): Servus und willkommen bei OSM

Ein kleiner Tipp:
In OSM werden alle Namen ausgeschrieben, keine Abkürzungen:

addr:street=Kirchenstr

sollte 

addr:street=Kirchenstraße

sein

Gruß
Toni
silversurfer83 (2025-12-20 14:04:31+00:00): Hi there

I noticed that you added landuse in this changeset and connecetd it to the sourrounding highways.

This used to be done "in the olden days" of OSM but it is not good practice today. Please don't glue landuse to highways. Thank you.
Hb- (2026-02-05 10:38:31+00:00): Warum wurde bei dieser Änderung das NSG Bachtäler r5686037 gelöscht?
Ropino (2026-02-05 12:27:51+00:00): Hallo,
das ist mir versehentlich passiert und war keine Absicht.
Ich habe es mir gerade angeschaut.
Ich könnte es wieder herstellen, habe aber mit einem enthalten Way (382199855) Konflikte die ich nicht so einfach auflösen kann.
Meine Änderung und der nachfolgende CS 176784765 (von welzheimerwald) wäre -nur das NSG betreffend- soweit rücksetzbar.
Problem sehe ich in der (neuen) Nutzung diverser node im CS 178089291.
Ein Beispiel wäre der Node 323677074:
in Version 1 und 2 lag dieser im Wald nördöstlich von Sorge und mit V3 ist er eine Hausecke in Tettenborn. Davon gibt es leider sehr viele Node in/um Tettenborn, die früher im o.g. Way enthalten waren und jetzt völlig andere Nutzung/Positionen haben.
Mein Vorschlag wäre: Wiederherstellung der Relation ohne den Way 382199855.
Und diese anschließend als neuen Way ergänzen.
Oder hättest du eine bessere Lösung?
VG
Ropino (2026-02-05 12:35:19+00:00): kleine Korrektur: Der node 323677074 lag nordWESTlich von Sorge
Hb- (2026-02-05 15:36:25+00:00): Ja, scheinbar frei herumliegende Punkte werden schon mal recycelt. Der genannte Weg müsste dann neu erstellt werden.
Ropino (2026-02-05 21:21:04+00:00): Die Relation ist wiederhergestellt incl. der Reparatur von ein paar kleinen Konflikten.
---
"Recycling" von Nodes? ... und diese dann für was völlig anderes viele km entfernt nutzen?
Das macht mMn u.a. in Hinsicht auf die Historie der Nodes (oder Ways) für mich gar keinen Sinn und erschwert bzw. macht quasi eine Wiederherstellung nach Fehlern -wie hier- nahezu unmöglich.
VG
Sandonin (2025-12-15 12:40:48+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai repris les modifications que vous avez appliquées sur les relations ferroviaires, car les suggestions pour l'exploitant ne sont pas appropriées : le tag SNCF Voyageurs est ultra-majoritaire, conseillé dans les tablettes mais pas dans l'éditeur...
iandees (2025-12-09 17:54:23+00:00): Was this one in the wrong spot?
bpaulson75fb (2025-12-09 19:03:45+00:00): The mall is moving a few ALPRs. There are some poles installed waiting for cameras.
iandees (2025-12-09 19:22:41+00:00): Gotcha. Thanks for updating them!
ratrun (2025-12-14 06:20:35+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM

Please note that we are not allowed to use Google maps because of their licensing.

But as you indicated in your changeset comment that you have local knowledge, I will did not revert the new data you entered.

Instead, I fixed it. Please connect the nodes at junctions, this is important for routing. Additionally I deleted the name=Residential as this is not a proper name. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-23 08:21:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-23 08:21:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856
Mex (2025-12-18 15:27:06+00:00): Hi, thanks for your changes, might I recommend using the square up tool in id editor to make houses have nice square corners, (shortcut q)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175718175
Yog Sot (2025-12-09 20:02:11+00:00): thx
Cortix (2025-12-10 17:02:44+00:00): Ciao, visti i pochi tag che hai messo nella relazione Giro delle Orane, sei sicuro che rispetta i criteri della comunità?
Ha un numero di riferimento? Ci sono mappe o paline segnaletiche?
Io non ho trovato alcuna informazione sul web a riguardo
f_gonella (2025-12-10 18:13:57+00:00): Ciao Cortix, ho eliminato una doppia mappatura di un percorso pedonale (footway) che ricalcava la strada e la ciclabile per il 90% del percorso. Per non perdere l’informazione eliminata ho creato la relazione, ma non ne so di più. Il problema mi era stato segnalato in quanto anno fa avevo modificato la strada unclassified e la cycleway adiacenti e la footway le intersecava in un paio di punti. Se ritieni che la relazione sia da eliminare, fai pure!
Cortix (2025-12-11 12:42:10+00:00): Certo, le linee guida sulle relazioni hiking o foot sono restrittive. Se non le rispettano, meglio eliminare. Dopo effettuo la cancellazione.
TrickyFoxy (2025-12-20 21:31:07+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176197391
dmjab13 (2025-12-09 18:13:23+00:00): why is this changeset so wide
Andrea Musuruane (2025-12-10 09:41:57+00:00): A me sembra che il nome sia ben visibile: https://www.gedistatic.it/content/gnn/img/lastampa/2021/11/23/231127716-ab014611-cfe3-46f6-a27f-ab8f8a6e4006.jpg?webp
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175719865
Andrea Musuruane (2025-12-10 09:42:33+00:00): Fatto revert.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175750042
habi (2025-12-11 07:54:29+00:00): Ciao sfwd

Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap!
Schön machst du hier mit und hilfst, die Karte und die Kartendaten zu pflegen.

Ein Skatepark ist nicht ein https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure%3Dpark, wie du den hier erfasst hast, sondern wird so erfasst: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure%3Dpitch#Skatepark

Mit etwas Suchmaschinen-Fu habe ich noch herausgefunden, dass das Ding betoniert ist.
Einen Namen und eine Postadresse braucht der Park in OpenStreetMap auch nicht, deshalb habe ich das in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175789970 so angepasst.

E Gruess us Bärn,
habi

PS: Bei irgendwelchen Fragen gerne hier in den Kommentaren nachhaken oder bei https://c.osm.org/c/107 eine Diskussion eröffnen, wir versuchen gerne zu helfen
Syl (2025-12-10 10:03:20+00:00): Bonjour, merci pour cet ajout. Je me suis permis de reprendre la route en fusionnant les deux voies là où il n'y a pas de séparation physique entre elles. J'ai aussi enlevé l'attribut disant que l'accès est autorisé pour tout, il n'est pas à mettre systématiquement car il sous-entend que vraiment tout est autorisé ici, y compris les chevaux et les motoneiges.
whb (2025-12-20 09:54:19+00:00): Änderungssatz rückgängig gemacht:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176172614
EtienneJr (2026-03-07 17:27:47+00:00): Hi,
I don't think "Capacité" is a correct translation in French for the name of node/2703828201
It looks like a wrong automatic translation (capacity if a common name in French, its English translation is capacity).
On wikipedia, the translation is "Xian de Nangqên"
https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xian_de_Nangq%C3%AAn

And the same for 3318129396, diversité if the French word for diversity in English. French people won't use is for Qapugtang.
Aethonatic (2025-12-20 17:13:38+00:00): Kevjs, what do you constitute as a highway=living_street? To me, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1293856219 appears to be a standard driveway.
K12230LF (2025-12-10 12:29:51+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue sur OpenStreetMap,

Merci pour votre ajout de restaurant. 

Cependant, il semblerait que par cet ajout vous ayez remplacé le lieu-dit ou hameau "La Libertie" par le restaurant en lui-même : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1651534217/history

Le hameau n'existe actuellement plus dans OpenStreetMap alors qu'il possède bien un code FANTOIR et est donc bien référencé dans la Base d'Adresse Nationale.

Avez-vous la possibilité de revenir sur vos modifications en rétablissant le hameau et en ajoutant un nouveau point au plus proche du lieu exact de l'entrée du restaurant ? 

A noter que vous pouvez, si vous le souhaitez, trouver beaucoup de ressources ici : https://www.openstreetmap.fr/contribuer/ , notamment le forum pour échanger avec la communauté en cas de doutes.

Il y a tout plein de contributeurs qui seraient super heureux d'échanger avec un office de tourisme de plus sur le forum.

Bonne cartographie !
Office de tourisme de Mussidan-Villamblard (2025-12-18 10:03:20+00:00): Bonjour
Merci pour votre retour. L'office de tourisme fait ses premiers pas et se forme sur OSM. Nous avons obtenu de l'aide à l'instant pour résoudre notre petite erreur, c'est corrigé. Bonne journée
Vinber-Pro (2025-12-19 13:15:49+00:00): yep, corrigé ici https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175720542#map=19/44.951573/0.566311

bonne journée
Vinber-Pro (2025-12-19 13:16:52+00:00): ok avec le bon lien https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176085955 !
dmjab13 (2025-12-09 18:13:18+00:00): why is this changeset so wide
Glassman (2025-12-10 03:15:16+00:00): FYI - your email bounces when I sent a message.
Tosenbo (2026-01-20 20:16:18+00:00): Bonjour Mathias, je sais pas si tu as reçu une notif mais quelqu'un est trés agacé que tu ai remis ces 2 trottoir en bicycle=yes, selon lui les vélo ne sont pas autorisé, je ne sais pas si tu as des sources qui disent le contraire ?

Voir note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4982338
et https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4982339

Je te laisse gérer les notes
aTarom (2025-12-10 20:27:11+00:00): Hola, parece que se han quedado nodos huérfanos al editar algunas zonas
los elimino en este changeset
https://osmcha.org/changesets/175775537
¿Tendrías alguna idea de por qué podría estar ocurriendo?
Saludos
Reino Baptista (2025-12-11 08:22:23+00:00): Hola, muchas gracias por revisarlo.  

Probablemente sea la extensión CADTools. El fallo no aparece siempre, pero cuando ocurre los puntos quedan visibles inmediatamente en la edición y puedo borrarlos sin problema… cosa que esta vez no sucedió.  
RB
ScrawnyMeowth1 (2025-12-10 00:31:02+00:00): Hello fivehe,

Thank you for your help in adding buildings! However please be conscious of what imagery you are using when mapping. Mapbox imagery tends to be very outdated; if you look at the most recent Esri imagery, some of these buildings you added have now been demolished. I'm not familiar with JOSM, but there should be some way to view the date that the imagery was taken, if available.

Thanks!
Glassman (2025-12-10 03:14:47+00:00): I was surprised to find that Mapbox was more current than even the latest ESRI World Imagery around me when looking at this edit.
Wandergecko (2025-12-10 11:04:59+00:00): Hoffe, alles ok
rempshaener (2025-12-10 21:23:06+00:00): Hallo,
Defibrillatoren haben keine Adresse.
Bitte entfernen oder durch dieses Schema hier ersetzen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:object:*
Viele Grüße
trjdjx (2025-12-29 14:15:32+00:00): Dankeschön für den Hinweis. 
Das Schema https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:object:* kannte ich noch nicht. Ich habe es geändert.
Freundliche Grüße
TinPetreković (2025-12-12 13:46:24+00:00): Segments that were split in have been merged back together and tagged with restrictions according to posted signs in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175847225
eggie (2025-12-09 16:42:34+00:00): Dag ppkonings... Dan is hen nu niet erg consistent getagd, want kijk eens op[ andere aansluitingen.

De aansluiting is getagd oor een ervaren inframapper. Heb je dan contact opgenomen en geïnformeerd waarom hij dat zo doet?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-12-09 16:45:26+00:00): Het is afwijkend van alle andere aansluitingen.
Neem desnoods contact op met de voorgaande mapper.
Voorlopig draai ik je wijzigingen weer terug. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-12-09 16:45:49+00:00): reverted by changeset #175722662
dmjab13 (2025-12-09 18:13:11+00:00): why is this changeset so wide