piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NorthCrab_upload (2024-10-10 19:01:11+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.

"Grodzisko Dolne":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12241981856
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12241981857
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12241981858
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/813336828
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/853033104
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/901702425
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/901702691
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1242754652
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1242755023

"Grodzisko Górne":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12241981859
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/864749716
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/866781973
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1242754415
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1242754424
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1242754744

"Laszczyny":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/453386691
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/453386693

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2024-10-10 19:01:12+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/852783133

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Frans S (2024-10-29 14:29:02+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please realize that this is a building and road mapping only. (read the instructions :-) )
Focus on highways which connects settlements, buildings and villages.
Don't waste energy on mapping traces in between agricultural plots and rural areas, or ending somewhere in the middle of nowhere.
Best regards
NorthCrab_upload (2024-10-10 19:41:08+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.

"Świętoniowa":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12242013000
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12242060201
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/356045830
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/356046257
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/356047099
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1038693685
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1137704553

"Gniewczyna Łańcucka":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12242060202
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12242060203
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12242060204
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12242060205
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12242060206
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12242060207
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12242060226
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1038692216

"Gniewczya Łańcucka":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/321962042

"Świetoniowa":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/356047319

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Kovoschiz (2024-10-11 07:23:38+00:00): Don't use `=permissive` . That means allowed. It's `=private` .
Road–Runner (2024-10-12 01:03:54+00:00): Man kann ja darüber diskutieren (tatsächlich find ichs konzeptionell gar nicht so schlecht), aber Singletracks als leisure=track zu kartieren ist sehr unüblich. Defacto machst das nur du so https://overpass-turbo.eu/?template=key-value&key=leisure&value=track
Road–Runner (2024-10-12 01:13:15+00:00): Sorry, das ist der richtige overpass Link https://overpass-ultra.us/#run&m=6.24/47.3126/13.8451&q=PQKgUAKgFglgzgAigQ0QIwKYYHYIOY4YBOyALhgCYJoCeCpUGCA9gG7EAOqcAtKQK5E0zBAHcYAL2REKAOkiMWRGHhjZkAGwRwM0gMZQxqAFxhAOAQaM8QRgC8pEnoDWCZNioAKNDD009l2xoMRGYiah8-AIpglXVyCgBKBDUEAEF+OAcYZEBcAjAQYDAAbWZ+UmMAKzhmbABdItIYAFsMUvKAJgBWWoBuMGBgBAAzDFIDVyJdBDN0zOVc+hEdfUM1MH7BvDJGMMm4fg1SODAPMAQEbFEiIoAiS2tJm9sbh2RnG-qb719-DCeboJwD4eADeILQwgAHgBfaEJPrnS7XO5WfaPZ6vd6fb6RP7PaJwWJkSjAsEQ5gwuF9MDwjYIDjKbCkBB7A5HMBtfCtJo9IA
Osmonaut (2024-10-12 17:40:43+00:00): Dass nur ich das so mach stimmt nicht, deine overpass Abfragen beweisen das :) Aber eh, viele sinds nicht.

Konzeptuell find ich das passender so. Einmal abwarten, was die MTB Downhill Community dazu sagt. Wenn das Bestand hat könnte man es ausweiten. Am Arme Leute Bichl ists schon ein paar Tage länger und den Mapper der die ersterfasst hat den hab ich angeschrieben deswegen. Gut ist jedenfalls auch, dass die Tracks in der Standardansicht erhalten bleiben.
Road–Runner (2024-10-12 19:51:10+00:00): Das Problem ist, dass über leisure=track nicht geroutet wird. Und in gewisser Hinsicht sind Singletrails Radwege. Vor allem bei talübergreifenden Singletrails auf wichtigen MTB-Routen wie etwa übers Tuxerjoch oder Pfitscherjoch ist das der Fall.

Wsl wäre ein eigener Wert (highway=singletrack) ähnlich wie es bei via_ferrata gemacht worden ist oder ein eigener Tag (singletrack=yes) ähnlich wie bei der Fahrradstraße besser.
Osmonaut (2024-10-13 15:34:30+00:00): Hallo RoadRunner, ich seh das Problem nicht, kenne aber auch nur den Flachjochtrail im Obernbergtal. Da ist ja sowieso path, weil der ist für Fuß nicht gesperrt, meines Wissens. Ein sogenannter shared-use wohl. Man könnte sogar kombinieren, wenn man unbedingt will.

Dass leisure=track nicht routet seh ich als Vorteil, dann werden Leute die mit Rad von der Hungerburg nach Mühlau wollen nun nicht mehr über die Single-Trails geschickt - alle Router der Startseite haben das gemacht. Passt wohl?
Road–Runner (2024-10-14 20:19:10+00:00): leisure = track wird auch in den beiden Radkarten nicht angezeigt. 
Außerdem kann man Radwege über smothness steuern, dann routen da auch keine Radrouter mehr drüber.

Ich bin auch kein Downhiller aber ich denke diese Lösung ist nicht optimal, weil hier alle Singletrails ausgesperrt werden. Deshalb ist bei den wenigen leisure = track oft noch zusätzlich ein highway=* dran gehängt.
Hungerburg (2024-11-07 00:32:50+00:00): Dass die Router smoothness auswerten konnte ich bei den dreien auf osm.org nicht beobachten. Also nachgeschaut, und siehe da - https://github.com/graphhopper/graphhopper/issues/3068 und 3078.

Die Downhills auf der Hungerburg sind mittlerweile alle wieder fürs Routen verfügbar. Dass Peter Muret da zum highway=cycleway gegriffen hat find ich nicht so gut, da war path noch besser.

Doppeltagging eventuell auch passabel, leisure=track für die Korrektheit und path für den Komfort.
Road–Runner (2024-11-07 21:45:42+00:00): Ich sehe das ähnlich wie mit dem Pfadthema. Thematisch ist ein Singletrack ein Radweg, wie auch ein markierter T6 Weg ein Pfad ist.

Aber klar ist, dass diese Wegtypen nur für wenige Leute geeignet sind. Vielleicht schafft man es, dass es hier jetzt neue Tags eingeführt werden, wie ja etwa auch via_ferrata eigenständig wurde. Ich würde wsl dafür stimmen.

Bei Pfaden ist sac_scale mittlerweile ganz gut etabliert und Router vermeiden schwierige Wege, das ist bei den Radwegen leider noch nicht so. Als Routerentwickler würde ich auch alles was nicht halbwegs glatt und smooth ist fürs Routen sperren.

Ich fahre kein Downhill und hab eigentlich keine ausgeprägte Meinung dazu, wenn dir leisure=track wichtig ist, dann kannst du es ja wieder hinzufügen.
bxl-forever (2024-10-10 20:32:29+00:00): Hello,

Thanks for the fires.  However, the changeset seems to introduce new mistakes, e.g.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/91434627
building=government_office is not a recognised tag.  (And the amenity=post_office should preferably be mapped as a floating node instead of merging everything on the building itself).

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/848166251
The operator of an OCMW is the municipality, therefore "operator=Sint-Genesius-Rode - Rhode-Saint-Genèse" was correct.  You changed it into operator=OCMW… which means that the OCMW operates itself.  We never do this on OSM.  Did anyone request that you do that?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2338251650 and many others: zebra markings are visible, therefore it’s better to tag crossing:markings=zebra directly instead of crossing:markings=yes, because "yes" won’t give enough information to renderers and it will require other mappers to change it again.  Let’s save time for everyone.

Hope this helps. Have a nice day.
woodpeck (2024-10-22 08:10:45+00:00): Hello TyJack, the placeholder in your changeset comment "[Kindly replace this text and share what you've been working on, like adding buildings or other edits]" was meant to be replaced with a meaningful message by you. Please do that the next time you upload an edit to OSM.
Frans S (2024-10-25 13:03:21+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------

A: Inaccurate mapping.

E: Buildings not squared.
H: Included a yard of clearing.


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157732259
emersonveenstra (2024-10-31 11:38:14+00:00): Hi there,

Looks like you typoed the access tag on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1322995724, could you please fix it? Thanks!
NeisBot (2024-10-10 20:52:37+00:00): Hi eafgirl, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 94 landuse(')

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=157732874
Em :) (2024-10-10 20:57:58+00:00): Hello! Yeah this was intentional, I noticed the project only told us to map buildings and roads, I’m new to using open street map so I didn’t see this at first, and I accidentally added a bunch of farmland map points. Sorry about any confusion this caused. :)
pitscheplatsch (2024-10-10 21:33:56+00:00): Thanks for your reply, eafgirl.

#HappyMapping
gormur (2026-01-25 14:29:24+00:00): I'm curious to know on what basis you changed the two station name:en from Tateyama to Mt Tate? I've travelled through, and every sign says "Tateyama". Even the english announcements onboard the trains say "Tateyama". Others seems to agree: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4716872
I plan on changing name:en and :fr back to Tateyama.
tartiflex (2026-01-26 17:31:57+00:00): Indeed, there was a mistake on my part. I have made the correction.
AgusQui (2024-10-14 02:32:16+00:00): no hay separador físico en Av Del Libertador frente a Plaza San Martín
(Inactive) Huge_OSM_Fan (2024-10-14 16:38:04+00:00): Hello AgusQui, 

Thanks for your message. We have taken another look at this intersection and we can confirm that there are bollards separating the east/west bound lanes. This is evident in this imagery: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-34.59322797089278&lng=-58.374696999581715&z=18.554141569166717&focus=photo&pKey=154817229855000 . This imagery is from 2017, but we (Kaart) have collected new imagery in the last couple of months and it shows the same bollards. This imagery will be viewable on Mapillary soon, currently its in ingestion portion of Mapillary's uploads. 
We will remap the intersection, following OSM best practices shortly. Thanks!

Huge_OSM_Fan
AgusQui (2024-10-14 17:27:11+00:00): Esos "palitos" como le llamamos nosotros, no son una barrera física que impidan la el cambio al carril contrario, son fácilmente atravesables por bicicletas, motos, buses y camiones, solo son algo complicadas para automóviles. Solo se separan carriles si hay barrera física.
jmaspons (2024-10-15 08:35:54+00:00): Why do you remove the wikidata tag?
contempttipoffcrease (2024-10-17 09:30:16+00:00): It is not correct and mispelled
jmaspons (2024-10-18 14:58:25+00:00): Wikidata is a code and was correct. Somebody already fixed it
NorthCrab_upload (2024-10-10 22:24:20+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Osowa":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12242432544
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12242432942

"Hieronima Derdowskiego":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12242432622
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12242432623
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12242432769
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12242432770

"Prusa":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12242432634
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12242432781
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12242432782
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12242432783

"Kochanowskiego":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12242432650

"Wyszyńskiego":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12242433008
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12242433009

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
neuhausr (2024-10-11 14:46:18+00:00): hoping this involved samples! :)
iandees (2024-10-11 15:03:02+00:00): Hah, not this trip! I was giving a demo of EveryDoor to someone that lives in the neighborhood :)
impiaaa (2024-10-10 21:38:55+00:00): forgot to add source: https://matkoniecz.codeberg.page/improving_openstreetmap_using_alltheplaces_dataset/missing_shops_caliber_collision_us_37%20-122.html
Tjuro (2024-10-21 12:26:04+00:00): Beste S_Emo,

Wanneer een poi of ander element, niet meer bestaat/voor langere tijd gesloten is. Word geacht de poi informatie te verwijderd te worden van het adres. of een dient er een
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
gebruikt te worden op het feature element.

Het toevoegen van voorlopig gesloten doet niks, en hierdoor heb je dit restaurant letterlijk "Steaktaria (voorlopig gesloten)" genoemd.

Ook heb je bij de website gelinkt naar een artikel. De website dient naar de website van het poi zelf te wijzen.

Omdat het er naar uitziet dat dit niet heel lang gaat duren hoeft de poi niet verwijderd te worden.

Ik heb het voor je opgelost.

Met vriendelijke groet,

Tjuro
S_Emo (2024-11-03 14:44:18+00:00): Perfect. Hartelijk dank Tjuro. Weet ik het voor een volgende keer :) 
Ook dank voor de suggestie met de link naar de lifecycle prefix. Bij construction kende/gebruikte ik die al
okainov (2024-10-14 12:33:51+00:00): The changeset spans way beyond Bulgaria, please split such huge changes to smaller chunks next time, thanks!
NorthCrab_upload (2024-10-10 22:11:00+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12242365478
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/106275176

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
silversurfer83 (2024-10-11 20:31:32+00:00): Moin Herr Berti :)

ein paar Hinweise/Bitten/...:

- Dein Editor fragt dich bei jedem Speichern einer Änderung nach einem Kommentar und der Quelle deiner Informationen. Bitte mache regen Nutzen von der Möglichkeit dies einzutragen:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

- wenn Geschäfte schließen hinterlassen sie oft einen leeren Laden. Dieser kann von einem anderen Geschäft bezogen werden. Der Punkt, der das Geschäft repräsentiert(e), kann auch als Repräsentation der Räumlichkeit gesehen werden. Daher kann es in sehr vielen Fällen korrekt sein, den Punkt nicht einfach zu löschen. Die Lebenszyklus Präfixe sind idR die bessere Lösung:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix

bei Fragen immer raus damit
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157736407
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-18 05:22:21+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165095996
NeisBot (2024-10-11 00:14:49+00:00): Hello zmbalw, welcome to OSM, and thank you for your contributions!

I've taken a look at your recent edits and wanted to discuss a few discrepancies I noticed regarding the surrounding environmental features. Specifically, the locations in your edits don't seem to align with the typical geographical characteristics expected in that area. Here are some (max 10) relevant links to the edits:
https://osm.org/node/12242547532

Could you please take a look?
Looking forward to your response.

#Somewhere
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=157736674
zmbalw (2024-10-11 00:38:38+00:00): Hi, this edit is an inclusion of an isolated seamount, a part of South Sandwich islands chain. It is in the middle of the ocean, so far away from other features.
tastrax (2024-10-11 09:59:53+00:00): Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, +61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features#Phone_Numbers .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
Thibaultmol (2024-10-12 07:26:08+00:00): Hi, I noticed you added a picture of the meat you bought at the butcher. I don't think that's quite the kind of images that should be in OpenStreetMap. Instead it should be a picture from either the outside or the inside of the store itself
https://mapcomplete.org/shops.html?z=17.9&lat=-27.2887312&lon=152.9839781#node/4211895436
Josh Glenn (xuid0) (2024-10-18 05:15:45+00:00): Sorry I know not to post this kind of things next time.
Thibaultmol (2024-10-18 06:18:41+00:00): No worries, just wanted to let you know
gurglypipe (2024-10-11 09:49:14+00:00): Hiya, thanks for the efforts you’re putting into additional tagging on OSM.

A few pointers from reviewing some of your most recent edits:

 - Please pay attention to the semantics of tags. The wikimedia_commons tag you used in this changeset is to point to a category or single image on the Commons, not a Wikipedia page. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikimedia_commons.

 - Be careful to not add duplicate tags to other objects. A number of the objects (like churches or train station buildings) you’ve edited recently already had all the tags you added present on the way which encloses the building. This mapping is correct, and the duplicate tags did not need to be added to the building. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element

Thanks!
AndiBing (2024-11-18 14:37:49+00:00): Happy to help... thanks for the pointers :-)
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-13 01:39:30+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164876909
Robin Zyx (2024-10-11 08:59:20+00:00): It's hard to keep up with the weed shops. Just discovered tonight while walking home that one was opening where another was shut down by the sheriff a couple months ago. This a few days after another a couple blocks away was shut down a maybe a week go.
fortera_au (2024-10-11 02:17:40+00:00): Hi, is this part of a chain of computer repair places? If not, the brand tag is wrong and shouldn’t be set. You also need to format the number correctly, it should be +61 494 068 255.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157737597
balchen (2024-10-25 19:26:26+00:00): Hvorfor cycleway:left=lane, cycleway:right=track og cycleway:both=lane i Uelands gate?
forteller (2024-10-25 20:14:56+00:00): Ah, glemte å fjerne both=lane. Takk, fikset nå.
Stalker61 (2024-10-11 12:01:03+00:00): Добрый день.
Вас ведь уже просили не сносить правильную информацию (данные).
Не надо указывать в ref Идентификационный номер (71-140 ОП МЗ 71Н-11). В данный тег ref вносится учетный номер 71-140Н-11, где 140 дополнительное значение кода региона (ЯНАО), чтобы валидировать данные ХМАО, ЯНАО и Тюменской области. Все три субъекта самостоятельно присваивают ID и ref и они часто совпадают. Это правило одинаково как для самого wey автодороги, так и для Relation:route
В тег name Relation:route вносится полное Наименование автомобильной дороги, а вот на самом wey автодороги указывается Имя собственное - Дон, Урал, Лена, Россия и т.д.
Вам даже редактор дурниной орёт, при заполнении тега name, Имя собственное, если оно есть!
Тег operator и source также следует указывать в Relation. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:ref
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Highway_classification
https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Имя_собственное
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Relation:route
Научитесь наконец-то уважать пользовательские договоренности и соглашения.
Stalker61 (2024-10-11 12:12:28+00:00): Вот так выглядит relation  https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3008472
Stalker61 (2024-10-11 12:19:26+00:00): Автодорогами необходимо заниматься на регулярной основе, а не от случая к случаю.
user_14840936 (2024-10-12 01:38:58+00:00): "Пользовательские соглашения" или положения действующих нормативно-правовых актов РФ и субъектов Федерации - ЧТО я должен БОЛЬШЕ уважать, соблюдать, выполнять и т.п.? И последнее: сколько и по какому случаю мне необходимо(!?) заниматься(!?) автодорогами я буду решать без вашего участия. И заниматься(!) ими я буду в точном соответствии с действующими нормативно-правовыми актами страны пребывания (РФ в данном случае), как это предписано правилами ОСМ, чего и вам от всей души желаю!
Stalker61 (2024-10-12 02:37:30+00:00): Здесь играют по правилам OSM, или вообще не играют. Бан с откатом и прощай дорогой вандал :)
❤️‍🔥 (2024-10-11 08:18:37+00:00): Hi, it seems like you've created a traffic signal here, which I assume is unintentional. Perhaps you could explain a bit more about about what you're trying to change?
amtplskaart (2024-10-12 02:35:30+00:00): Sdr. Ichsansy2901, mohon untuk memperhatikan cara-cara pengeditan geometry dalam OSM yang baik dan benar. Hasil editan saudara berpengaruh terhadap geometri-geometri lain yang sudah dikerjakan editor lain. Demikian juga dengan sistem tagging yang digunakan, sesuaikan dengan petunjuk dari OSM (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157739433
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-18 05:05:14+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165095780
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-08 03:41:21+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164659013
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-13 01:39:31+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164876909
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-10-11 20:28:43+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12243121303 - wilderness hut in town? Are you sure it matches https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism=wilderness%20hut description?
Hungerburg (2024-11-21 10:59:26+00:00): This comes from mapping with Organic Maps. In fact there are newly constructed residential buildings there that are missing in the data. C.f. https://github.com/organicmaps/organicmaps/issues/6733#issuecomment-1833354259

I think https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159380994 goes too far. This is not the first blanko revert, other users also did that before.
pantufla (2024-10-13 22:19:47+00:00): Danke :)
Patrickov (2026-05-10 14:30:37+00:00): I don't think it's a good idea to reuse a bus route relation on a completely different route.