piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-06 01:15:10+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nieprawidłowa wartość addr:postcode. Kod pocztowy powinien być formatu XX-XXX, gdzie X oznacza cyfrę.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13522244401

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-06 01:35:12+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nieprawidłowa wartość addr:postcode. Kod pocztowy powinien być formatu XX-XXX, gdzie X oznacza cyfrę.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13522244401

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-06 01:44:33+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nieprawidłowa wartość addr:postcode. Kod pocztowy powinien być formatu XX-XXX, gdzie X oznacza cyfrę.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13522244401

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NeisBot (2026-02-03 16:52:22+00:00): Hi proptied, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 85 building(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178059573
proptied (2026-02-03 16:57:00+00:00): These deletions were intentional. They were transient RVs that were incorrectly marked as buildings in an RV Park.
pitscheplatsch (2026-02-03 17:42:35+00:00): Thanks for your reply.
NeisBot (2026-02-04 06:30:58+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 7 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/482650207 v1 | 4 crossings
https://osm.org/way/482650177 v1 | 3 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/4754547728 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178060458
gendy54 (2026-04-17 10:55:07+00:00): Corrigé
GavinJimenez (2026-02-03 17:19:44+00:00): This was for a school project
eggie (2026-02-03 18:49:50+00:00): Welkom bij osm,
Bedabkt voor je bijdrage.
Tip.. Probeer svp op de bestaande adresnode bij te taggen. Dus op het gebouw.
Mvg,
eggie
eggie (2026-02-03 20:31:21+00:00): Info samengevoegd met bestaande adresnode
Groet,
egggie
bartgron (2026-02-03 21:14:26+00:00): Zestaw zmian wycofany:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178068397
Proszę o dodanie punktu zgodnie z zasadami OSM.
Pozdrawiam
felipeeugenio (2026-02-03 21:50:27+00:00): Hola. Algo de esto existe realmente? de donde salen esos nombres? hay varios caminos que no se observan en las fotos satelitales que está usando. Puede explicar la fuente por favor?

gracias
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178061051
rarad74 (2026-02-03 20:09:44+00:00): Hi, Please use diacritics for names or not add any names without diacritics.
Thanks.
KarooDesert (2026-02-05 18:08:37+00:00): Hello rarad74,
Thank you for reaching out regarding the proposed street name change. While we typically update street names based on user feedback within Maps, we also conduct independent research when necessary. I have not been able to locate any reliable sources confirming the use of diacritic marks for this street. Would it be Strada Măceșului? If you have knowledge indicating that diacritics are appropriate, I am happy to defer to your edits!

Thank you again for your continued support and for helping us maintain high mapping standards.
Norbert Dichter (2026-02-10 17:19:17+00:00): Hello, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. Thank you for your contribution. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. Or just hit the Q-key.
Also please keep in mind: many buildings are very close but do not actually touch each other, try to map them close to each other without letting them connect or share nodes with each other, roads, or residential area outlines. In the iD web editor, holding down the "alt" key will keep nodes from "snapping" to each other and accidentally connecting.  Thanks so much for your contribution, Norbert 'Nodi' Dichter, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178061348
dmlls (2026-02-03 20:35:10+00:00): Hola! Veo que eres un nuevo usuario, así que bienvenido a OSM :)

Solo un par de apuntes:

• Los valores de las etiquetas `phone` o `mobile` tienen que incluir el código de país (en el caso de España, el +34). Como puedes ver, otro compañero ya ha editado tus nodos añadiéndolo.

• El `addr:street` tiene que coincidir exactamente con el `name` de la calle/plaza, no con el `name:es` o cualquier otra clave. Es decir, en este caso debe ser "Plaça del Pare Fontova". Esto es muy importante; de lo contrario, las apps consumidoras no podrán interpolar a qué calle se refiere esa dirección.

• Si vas a añadir links de Instagram, es mejor ponerlos en la etiqueta más específica `contact:instagram` (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:contact:instagram) que en `website`.

Por lo demás todo bien, y gracias por animarte a contribuir! Cualquier otra duda, no dudes en enviarme un mensaje.

Un saludo,
Diego
dmlls (2026-02-09 13:32:28+00:00): @aTarom me acabo de dar cuenta de que puse el comentario en tu changeset en vez de en el del nuevo usuario, perdona! Copio el mensaje de nuevo en su changeset.
aTarom (2026-02-09 13:38:57+00:00): Nada que disculpar, lo tenía pendiente de contestar pero voy saturado, lo bueno, me he sentido unos años más joven :D
dmlls (2026-02-09 13:43:01+00:00): Jajaja me alegro! 😋
Nine-tailed (2026-02-06 12:30:32+00:00): Добрый день, рисовать велодорожку двумя веями это перебор. Кстати наличие велодорожки и так указано в идущей рядом пешеходной дорожке.
Константин Гам (2026-02-06 14:34:03+00:00): Здравствуйте!

При микромапинге нужно использовать принцип разумности. 
А мапить отдельными веями направления велодорожки, которая и так уже обозначена в карте - это совсем лишнее. Пожалуйста внимательно изучайте данные карты, прежде чем добавлять данные.
bartgron (2026-02-03 21:16:50+00:00): 1. Znaki stop dodajemy na linii drogi z dodanym odpowiednim kierunkiem.
2. Nie trzeba się przyznawać gdzie się mieszka w internecie do obcych ludzi
Jarek 🚲 (2026-02-03 17:56:50+00:00): FWIW, I looked at Bruce Trail website to see if I could figure out the intended trail routing in here, but the full maps require payment, and I couldn't see any detail in the preview maps.
NeisBot (2026-02-04 06:32:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/relation/15466032 v4

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Restaurant patio"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-02-12 05:54:54+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/178095763
Norbert Dichter (2026-02-10 17:19:01+00:00): Hello, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. Thank you for your contribution. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. Or just hit the Q-key.
Also please keep in mind: many buildings are very close but do not actually touch each other, try to map them close to each other without letting them connect or share nodes with each other, roads, or residential area outlines. In the iD web editor, holding down the "alt" key will keep nodes from "snapping" to each other and accidentally connecting.  Thanks so much for your contribution, Norbert 'Nodi' Dichter, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178062267
rskedgell (2026-02-03 19:33:44+00:00): Thanks!

I'd better add some houses to go with them :-)
mueschel (2026-02-04 11:41:00+00:00): Hallo,
hier sind wieder "@id = node/57629868" Tags in den Daten, die sollte es nicht geben.

Außerdem: Bitte verwende keine keys wie "Hafas_ID" - Referenznummer sollten immer in der Form von "ref:XYZ" erfasst werden, z.b. als ref:hafas.
DD1GJ (2026-02-03 21:48:03+00:00): Hallo MrEnglish, danke für den Hinweis. Ich habe alle Änderungssätze mit dem Reverter Plugin von JOSM zurückgesetzt. Um Konflikte zu vermeiden, habe ich Deine beiden Korrekturen auch mit zurückgesetzt:

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=178069111

Viele Grüße, Joachim
bartgron (2026-02-03 21:17:42+00:00): Proszę o niepodawanie szczegółów swojego życia obcym ludziom w internecie.
Pozdrawiam
keithonearth (2026-02-03 20:14:21+00:00): This road is only accessible to buses. 

I've been past a few times since the block of Broadway closed, and there's always been not just signage in place prohibiting private cars from turning left from Main Street to 8th, but also a police officer in place to ensure compliance with this. At a bare minimum the section of 8th connecting the north and south bound parts of Main Street should be tagged `access=no` and `bus=yes`, but that sounds a lot like a busway to me, even if it's unusually short.

In your opinion why is this not a busway? Are you just thinking about historial use? The fact that the block of Broadway will be closed for at least 4 months makes it worthwhile to map the changes.
keithonearth (2026-02-04 02:51:24+00:00): I've retagged it as `access=no` and `bus=yes`, but I think this is less clear than simply calling it a busway. I also fixed the turn restriction that you had broken. 

I'd like to give you a chance to respond, but it is unwise to have this mapped as if it is publicly accessible. Why do you think `busway` is inappropriate for the connection between Main Street northbound and E 8th, when it is only accessible to buses?

 It would be helpful if you added source tags to your changesets. You can see I've tagged my changeset source as "Survey".
in2itivity (2026-02-06 21:26:02+00:00): Just want to chime in with my own observations: I also surveyed the area a couple days ago and it's actually quite unclear. The installed overhead turn lane signage reads "buses and local traffic only", but there is also a temporary stand-up sign placed on the ground that says "no left turn except buses".
At the time I visited, there was no enforcement personnel, and I saw many private cars taking the left turn anyways.

Either way, I do not believe that this small connection contains the amount of infrastructure necessary to meet the criteria of a busway. It is at best a bus-only link road, but due to the conflicting restriction signage, even the bus-only restriction is debatable.
NeisBot (2026-02-04 06:32:46+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13522458296 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Dance School"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-02-12 05:54:56+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/178095930
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-06 01:44:55+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13522410581

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
bartgron (2026-02-03 21:19:17+00:00): Proszę o źródło takiej nazwy
bartgron (2026-02-12 17:03:45+00:00): Z uwagi na brak odpowiedzi zestaw zmian został wycofany:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178467415
Pozdrawiam
dknelson9876 (2026-02-10 04:15:01+00:00): Hi AngMapper, just because it is not public does not mean it is not a campground. Further, the tagged website lists that in the fall this campground is available to rent to public groups.
AngMapper (2026-02-10 15:19:32+00:00): The owner of Camp Cloud Rim has requested this removal, stating that their property is not public and should not be displayed as such on OSM.
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-06 00:35:11+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4441454210
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1473964063

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-06 01:44:34+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4441454210
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1473964063

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
silversurfer83 (2026-02-03 20:20:35+00:00): Hi :)

das hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/366270125 ist dir aufgefallen?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178063959
giggie (2026-02-03 20:45:51+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis! Ich hatte den Pfad und umliegende Pfade bei der Bearbeitung zwischenzeitlich aufgeteilt, bei der Zusammensetzung ist dieses Merkmal scheinbar versehentlich auf den "outer"-Teil des Multipolygons gerutscht. Ich habe es korrigiert.
Cayenne17 (2026-02-04 12:16:07+00:00): Bonjour,
Le site qui a été rajouté sur le way de Renault de Celle-sur-belle : https://osm.org/way/75419221, le site n'est pas le bon, c'est celui d'ALES dans le département 30 : (1361 Quai du mas d'hours, 30100 ALES)
Cayenne17 (2026-02-04 12:26:16+00:00): Il n'existe peut-être plus.
sur le site https://concessionnaire.renault.fr, c'est introuvable.
Par contre, sur la base sirene, j'ai bien un garage à 19 Rue des Acacias (Celle sur Belle) : https://annuaire-entreprises.data.gouv.fr/etablissement/48923760200029

Je n'ai pas vu d'annonce BODACC de liquidation.
Lisapple (2026-02-09 17:09:04+00:00): Merci Cayenne pour la correction.

J'ai mis le site officiel même s'il n'est plus disponible, le garage est donc sans doute fermé, ce qui expliquerait qu'il n'est pas sur le site de Renault (mais pas pourquoi j'ai mis celui d'Alès à la place).
Ça reste donc à vérifier sur place.
Cayenne17 (2026-02-04 12:34:14+00:00): Bonjour,
Le site qui a été rajouté sur le way de Renault de Celle-sur-belle : way/75419221, le site n'est pas le bon, c'est celui de (ST MAXIMIN 60740) département 60 : (60 Rue de valmy, 60740 ST MAXIMIN)

Il n'existe pas sur https://concessionnaire.renault.fr.
Cayenne17 (2026-02-04 17:30:19+00:00): Bonjour,
Le site qui a été rajouté sur le way de Renault de Saint-Hilaire-la-Palud : https://osm.org/way/74361859, le site n'est pas le bon, c'est celui de Niort (214 Avenue de paris, 79000 NIORT)



Il n'existe pas sur https://concessionnaire.renault.fr.
NeisBot (2026-02-04 06:31:12+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 12 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/677670987 v6 | 4 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178064623
pitscheplatsch (2026-02-04 06:55:28+00:00): In this case, it seems the reported issues are false positives. The geometries were not changed in a way that would introduce crossings, and the tagging adjustments did not create any new conflicts.

Sorry for the inconvenience, and thanks again for your map edits.

Regards,
Pascal
woodpeck_repair (2026-02-12 23:21:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 178479265 where the changeset comment is: revert changes that pretend to be made with vespucci but aren't
Harald Hartmann (2026-02-04 14:44:30+00:00): Hallo Lutz Graf, schön, dass du den Mut gefunden hast, dich anzumelden und selbst aktiv zu werden. Zu diesem Änderungssatz habe ich aber ein paar Anmerkungen: 
1. du hast eine Zapfsäule (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13522611130) hinzugefügt - wolltest du das wirklich so machen?
2. hast du aus der korrekt getaggten Überdachung (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/406742236) ein `building=tankstelle` gemacht, definitiv nicht richtig
3. und das wichtigste: die eigentliche Änderungen die du wohl wegen der Tankstelle überhaupt umsetzen wolltest, hast du nicht gemacht. Dazu müsste du diese Fläche (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/295919455) entsprechend bearbeiten.
rempshaener (2026-02-04 17:34:37+00:00): Hallo,

du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
1. Ja, du hast etwas editiert.
2. Ja, wenn du den Haken für die Prüfung setzt, schaut wirklich jemand darauf.
3. Nein, dein Edit kann nicht so bleiben; deswegen hat es ein anderer Mapper wieder gelöscht.
Bei Fragen bitte melden.
Viele Grüße
NeisBot (2026-02-04 06:32:48+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13297177315 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Auto body shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-12 05:54:59+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178437130
(Cleaned up leftovers from previous edits)
rivermont (2026-02-06 21:57:43+00:00): Hello, why did you change the trail numbers from 'FS 260' to 'US 260' for example? Why on some trails but not others?
NeisBot (2026-02-04 06:32:50+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13522661577 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Sprechtraining Institut"
---
Zum Beispiel könnte eine neutralere und sachlichere Version deines Textes lauten: "Sprechtraining Institut"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
A Krüger (2026-02-04 11:02:10+00:00): Thank you for your comment. I revised the description according to your guidance.
marcmarti (2026-02-11 19:53:12+00:00): Hola,

Adif és l'operador de l'infraestructura, tant les estacions com les vies, mentres que Renfe només opera els trens. Per tant, operator=Renfe només hauria d'aparèixer en tallers.
Robot8A (2026-02-11 20:37:15+00:00): No, les estacions de Rodalies son operades per Renfe. Això es pot veure a la cartelleria, que a les estacions operades per Renfe és diferent de les operades per Adif. També el podeu veure al Piservi d'Adif, que indica qui opera cada estació.
Robot8A (2026-02-11 20:40:38+00:00): Al Piservi titular en OSM és owner=*, i explotador és operator=*
Frans S (2026-04-09 14:18:43+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping
about highways:
Take the width of a trace into consideration when you tag such a trace.

Please follow the tagging mentioned in this wiki

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa

To measure the width of a road in ID editor 

First draw a line between the shoulders of a track . 
Then You can press [Ctrl]+[Shift]+[M] to turn on the measurement panel and read the result.
The majority of your mappings should be tagged as highway=path.
Best regards
bartgron (2026-02-03 20:07:25+00:00): Proszę o NATYCHMIASTOWE zaprzestanie dodawania takich nazw do dróg.
bartgron (2026-02-03 20:08:17+00:00): Nazwa oczywiście została skasowana
Fen <3 (2026-02-04 22:33:46+00:00): this change-set added disc golf baskets, which where not recognized by the app
NeisBot (2026-02-04 06:31:18+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 10 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1473983153 v1 | 10 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178066261
NeisReview (2026-02-12 05:05:07+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/178104519