piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
woodpeck_repair (2025-05-07 20:19:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 165956212 where the changeset comment is: revert removal of private paths. the tagging access=private is appropriate and correct.
aharvey (2025-04-29 04:38:02+00:00): What is the location value for?

The location key as documented at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:location doesn't match how you're using it, and I don't think it's right to use it as you are.

Can you hold off these edits until we resolve this?
aharvey (2025-04-29 04:40:08+00:00): Regarding the source, it's best used per tag eg source:name=* or better yet on the changeset. Since it's not quite correct to say the source was from the open data portal since it was added independently beforehand.
aharvey (2025-04-29 04:47:46+00:00): Furthermore an import must go through the proper import process.

I've previously proposed and worked through an import of this data at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue/AU_NSW_TfNSW_Railway_Level_Crossings you can see the kinds of documentation and community consultation you should do.
Tanzila_TA (2025-04-29 23:49:51+00:00): Hi @aharvey, great pickup on the location tag, I'll fix this. Since it's a suburb name, would addr:city be more suitable? Thank you!
Tanzila_TA (2025-04-29 23:58:06+00:00): I am unsure what you mean regarding recording the source? I am from TfNSW Data Services team, we have updated Open Data with the latest level crossing info and aim to improve OSM with the same.  We have recorded the source tag with the Open Data link previously for our other assets such as Rest Area. I am keen to understand if there's a better process of doing this.
aharvey (2025-04-30 03:56:06+00:00): Thanks for replying.

Do they really need suburb tagged?

It's already discouraged to add addr:city to most addresses since suburb boundaries are already mapped. In this case the level crossing is on the border of two Suburbs https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3173338 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12079778 but our suburb boundaries are not that accurate and features near the border are more ambiguous.

Regarding the source, I just think that it's misleading to add the source tag as you have to existing level crossings, as the source for those was likely not TfNSW's Open Data but organic OSM mappers from local knowledge, ground surveys, street level or aerial imagery. So best to just set your source on the changeset level not the each level crossing feature.

Good to know you've updated your dataset, apart from applying names were there any other discrepancies you've found?

Would it be worth me updated the Map Roulette challenge at https://maproulette.org/browse/challenges/49134 with the new data? Otherwise what process are you following, are you just going through each of them manually and comparing?
Tanzila_TA (2025-04-30 04:17:41+00:00): Internally we have an identifying ID, names and location of the level crossings. Since the names are not unique and we don't want to the IDs here, we wanted to add the suburb/ location as well, so that any discrepancies can be easily identified during any future audits. 

Thanks very much for your feedback, I'll speak to my team and discuss the best way forward. I'll have to speak to the OSM lead on the Map Roulette as well. 

We have been manually comparing, and I found only a few crossings in remote locations were missing (3/100 that I looked into so far).
aharvey (2025-04-30 08:22:15+00:00): I think comparing based on proximity is the best way to link them to your data. Sometimes we do include external references but I'm not sure that's best here.
MassCartog (2025-04-29 18:12:23+00:00): Hi welcome OSM. I see your adding a bunch of buildings and that's great! But here's a tip: when done outing a building select it and press "Q" this squares the corners to make them all right angles!
MassCartog (2025-05-03 14:54:38+00:00): Didnt respond, fixed some of the worst ones myself
watmildon (2025-12-13 21:48:28+00:00): Hello!

Lazy rivers aren't waterway=river and should be marked as attraction=lazy_river as they were previously. The enclosing swimming pool polygon is used to document the extant of the attraction.

I reverted that small bit of the changeset but wanted to let you know in case there needs to be some back and forth about it. :-D

Happy mapping!

Matt
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-04-30 11:06:34+00:00): In Quebec, it is legal to cross the street at any intersection, except when there is a no pedestrian sign. There are none here, so I will need to revert. The fact that it is dangerous or not is not taken into account unfortunately in osm for now and is the respondibility of other tools. Thanks!
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-04-30 11:07:45+00:00): Also, you removed bicycle connectors (small segments to make sur bicycle can access the footpaths to the train station and park there (using bicycle=dismount footways)
minusmajorityhh (2025-05-02 15:46:56+00:00): 请不要把绿化区域标注为公园
aharvey (2025-04-29 04:33:56+00:00): These likely should be under ref=* https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ref per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
全国道路维护 (2025-04-30 07:06:14+00:00): 你好，生活性道路living_street在中国并不存在，这是国内大部分编辑者的共识，如对此有疑问，请到osm中国tg群参加讨论
karayama (2025-04-30 07:18:11+00:00): 所谓的生活性道路living_street在中国并不存在，你凭什么断言？根据osm英文维基的定义和中国现实现状，中国城市特别是老旧小区大量存在这种道路。
此外，osm中国tg群内部讨论并且也肯定过济南、唐山等城市编辑者将人车未分流的老旧小区内部之路划为生活性道路。你既然提到群里，怎么不去翻阅一下历史记录？
Osm的编辑主要依据“在地原则”，而不是所谓的“全国大部分编辑者共识”，您在唐山常年定居过吗？你和唐山地区所有地图编辑者联系过吗？你举办过全国及唐山地区道路划分投票吗？如果没有，请尊重我们唐山内部编辑者的编辑工作，不要再妄图篡改我们唐山地区大量用户多年的共识和工作，谢谢。
全国道路维护 (2025-04-30 14:37:23+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hans:Tag:highway%3Dliving_street
全国道路维护 (2025-05-02 11:51:56+00:00): 今日osm中国区tg群内再一次讨论了涉及living_street的话题，群内成员再次认为“大陆没有livingstreet”“似乎城市规划理念不支持living_street存在，以前有过的也都被整改了”“所以living_street理应退出中国战场”，至于这种道路到底存不存在，我只不过是根据osm wiki中文的定义对全国范围内的道路使用情况做出调整，根据国情的不同不要对一些国家的特色标签进行生搬硬套或望文生义，至于你说的参考山东济南的案例和群内历史记录，山东省本身就存在着很多不科学的编辑，而群内的讨论都是具有时效性的，标签使用也都是在一次次的讨论和分析之后逐渐完善的，以前认为可以使用的标签不代表现在仍然合适，至于你听不听随便，自己的地盘自己管，不过你的理由充分的话可以去群里参加讨论说服众人
aharvey (2025-04-29 04:30:37+00:00): amenity=parking_space should be used for each individual parking space not a group of them. You can always still use amenity=parking for the whole parking area.

For the addr:housenumber's if you know the addr:street that would be helpful too.
ArchangelEkim (2025-04-29 04:34:54+00:00): Yep okay thats what I thought, seems others have used it in the wrong way then, I can easily copy paste that then.

What would be your suggestion for numbering the buildings since technically they are not an address number. Just a building ref number for the main address of 51 wicks rd.
aharvey (2025-04-29 04:47:17+00:00): If they aren't address numbers don't use addr:housenumber. If they are building numbers/codes use ref=*. If they are unit numbers you could use addr:unit but I think in this case they are probably just building numbers/codes which should be ref.

That said, if they are used for addressing then they should also be included in the addr:*=* tags https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:* but I'm not sure of where. You could also use addr:full for the full postal address.

Depends where you look for parking_space, for example https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1058112357
ArchangelEkim (2025-04-29 04:55:02+00:00): I thought about using ref and checked some articles about the issue which noted i should use house number, but yes they are sort of used in addressing since our deliveries are usually made out to the individual building of the entire campus (sort of like a unit number)
aharvey (2025-04-29 13:18:53+00:00): That's it though, if anything they act like a unit not addr:housenumber.

How you have it currently means the house at 30 Wicks Road https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6395430523 is the same address as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/332096380 which you've also tagged as addr:housenumber=30 which is then inside the campus which has addr:street=Wicks Road giving the hospital building 30 Wicks Road, which is wrong.

addr:unit is usually for a townhouse or apartment within an address, not usually for building numbers.

I'd still tag these as ref=* since they are reference numbers for the buildings within the campus.

Then separately to ref=* I'd also consider if there's a way to incorporate them into addr:*=* tags, likely just using addr:full for now.
adiatmad (2025-06-30 04:59:18+00:00): Hello ArkarHN! Just curious, did you mean to map the building level or layer? I noticed you mentioned "local knowledge" in your changeset, so I assume you're a local. Thank you

(https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1382204105)
(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer)
(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:level)
-------------
မင်္ဂလာပါ။
အဆင့် (level) သို့မဟုတ် အလွှာ (layer) ကိုအဆောက်အဦးမှာ map လုပ်ချင်တာလားလို့ စူးစမ်းမေးတာပါ။
သင် changeset မှာ "local knowledge" လို့ရေးထားတာကြောင့် ဒေသခံသူတစ်ဦးဖြစ်မယ်လို့ ခန့်မှန်းထားပါတယ်။
nevw (2025-04-29 05:37:21+00:00): Hi, do you know the name of the company or is there a business name on the centre?
mavl (2025-05-13 15:05:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
Warin61 (2025-10-17 07:24:20+00:00): The relation for the main south railway line looks to be obsolete. Before people added a second track it 'worked; but people have added a second tract and not added it to the relation ... or made a second relation with down and up as appropriate. 
This needs a tidy up ... as does most of the rail system here. 
Busses are not much better .. number of errors with ways missing or not in sequence.
donmac703 (2025-10-17 21:48:32+00:00): Hi,
Yes, the rail lines need updating. It appears that some may have been done with PTv1 ideas (1 route with ways marked both forward and backward) and some with PTv2 ideas (separate routes and ways for each direction).  I have been working with the bus routes, but as there are thousands of them in NSW, so it remains a WIP. See PTNA for the status of the various rail/tram/ferry/bus routes and what is wrong about them.
tomhukins (2025-04-29 11:19:03+00:00): Thank you for all your good work on OpenStreetMap.

This change names both the farmyard and farmhouse as both "Study Farm" which seems a bit awkward.

I suspect it would be slightly better to use "addr:housename" instead of "name" to tag the farm house.  What do you think?
tomhukins (2025-05-06 09:16:43+00:00): I have made this change in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165881684
aharvey (2025-04-29 13:21:06+00:00): ps JOSM has tools to make it easy to generate the parking space geometries from the outline + entering row/column counts. Much easier than manually drawing these out.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-05-01 21:33:55+00:00): This changeset deleted the highway tag and appears to be part of an improperly documented organised mapping effort.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165573999
evgenykatyshev (2025-06-03 07:33:42+00:00): Отменил вашу правку, т. к. вы сдвинули дома по неправильному снимку

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167120991
OldManCelli (2025-05-05 14:16:57+00:00): This is obvious fantasy and not based on reality. Please revert this changeset.
user_18023081 (2025-05-05 14:24:53+00:00): Reverted
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165849111
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-05 15:10:44+00:00): https://www.opengeofiction.net/ may be a project for you (check their rules before mapping!)
fortera_au (2025-04-29 06:47:06+00:00): Hi, for mobile phone numbers, the 4 from the area code should be grouped with the next two numbers (+61 466 770 588 in this case) to match the formatting used by the phone key.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165574677
hlez3456 (2025-04-30 00:25:00+00:00): Thanks for the correction. I've updated the numbers in . Is there a mention of this convention on the Key:phone wiki page, or the Australian tagging guidelines? I cannot seem to find it. Also, would the landline phone (of Burnside cosmetic) be re-written as +61 872 212 577? (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features#Phone_Numbers)
fortera_au (2025-04-30 00:40:09+00:00): The linked section for the Australian tagging guidelines has how landlines and mobiles should be, the Burnside Cosmetic one is correct already.

Basically, mobiles get grouped into 3 lots of 3 numbers, so +61 4## ### ###, and landlines are area code, then 2 sets of 4, so +61 # #### ####. How I remembered it to begin with was to just take the full number with the leading 0, but replace the 0 with "+61 ", so 0466 770 558 becomes +61 466 770 558 and 08 7221 2577 becomes +61 8 7221 2577.
hlez3456 (2025-04-30 03:32:24+00:00): I personally find it a bit odd that landlines go from 08 #### #### to +61 8 #### ####, while mobiles go from 04## ### ### to +61 4## ### ###.

I would expect them to be formatted similar to the landline, and have the 4 by itself: +61 4 ## ### ###. It is what it is, I guess.

Anyways, I've updated the phone number to be 3 lots of 3.
fortera_au (2025-04-30 03:37:13+00:00): It is a little weird, but that's just how our phone numbers are written for international use, and that's what OSM uses.
5m4u9 (2025-04-30 00:18:30+00:00): Hola, bienvenid@ y gracias por mejorar el mapa.

Solo comentar que los nombres en el mapa se escriben si abreviaciones.

Al comenzar a mapear siempre hay dudas o preguntas, te puede ayudar la guía de abajo. Pero también puesdes preguntar.

https://learnosm.org/es/beginner/start-osm/#beginning-osm-create-an-openstreetmap-account
maro21 (2025-04-29 20:19:56+00:00): - Nie dodajemy komentarzy w polu [name]. Ulica nie ma nazwy "Droga Zamknięta z powodu uszkodzeń po powodzi".
- W podanym źródle nie ma zakazu jazdy samochodem. Gdzie stoi znak zakazu ruchu lub wjazdu?
Sébastien Pi (2025-08-14 09:05:41+00:00): Bonjour Alexandre,

Peux-tu regarder https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4884204 ?
Je vois que tu es le dernier à avoir éditer la zone.

@+
BardafFr (2025-08-14 21:39:31+00:00): Effectivement une partie du chemin est bloqué par des arbres qui se sont cassée à cette endroit en direction de sous le pont. De l'autre coté du pont, le chemin existe et est utilisé par des migrants comme bidonville. Je vais cassée le chemin a cette endroit sur OSM
AndreaDp271 (2025-04-29 20:15:52+00:00): di preciso cos'è stato modificato?
Emabarto (2025-05-12 06:20:11+00:00): Ciao sono state corrette le abbreviazioni dei nomi delle strade tipo via A.Moro a via Aldo Moro
StC (2025-07-12 13:08:07+00:00): Bonjour,

des commentaires plus concrets seraient utiles pour comprendre ce que vous avez fait. Il me semble que ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre qui passe par là, mais votre commentaire vide en informations ne me permet pas d'en avoir le cœur net, ni de savoir ce qui dans votre travail mérite une attention particulière pour ne pas l'endommager lors de mes réparations.
osmviborg (2025-04-30 05:10:40+00:00): grassland?
Viima (2025-04-30 16:30:51+00:00): Hei! Tervetuloa Openstreetmapiin.

Musiikkikoulun lisäys onnistui, mutta valtatiehen 10 tuli terävä mutka, varmaankin vahingossa. Muokkauseditorissa saattaa huomaamatta klikata jotakin kohdetta ja siirtää sitä samalla, kun yrittää liikkua näkymässä. Korjasin valtatien muutoskokoelmalla 165642644 siirtämällä tiehen kuuluneen pisteen takaisin alkuperäiselle paikalleen.

Ohjeita kartoittamiseen saat Openstreetmapin wikistä. Tervetuloa myös suomenkieliselle keskustelufoorumille.

wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Fi:Aloittelijan_opas

community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/fi/67

Ystävällisin terveisin
Viima
DD1GJ (2025-04-29 07:04:21+00:00): Hallo, willkommen bei OSM und danke für das Eintragen der Hydranten. Für die weitere Pflege des Datenbestandes ist es äußerst ungünstig, wenn die Hydranten mit den Straßen verknüpft sind. Zoome bitte weiter in die Karte und setze die Hydranten auf der entsprechenden Seite neben die Straßen.
pitfire (2025-04-29 07:43:03+00:00): Hi Brummi2021,
ein Poller, der alles verbietet, oder meintest Du eher einen Zaun?

VG pitfire
Brummi2021 (2025-04-29 09:21:00+00:00): Huhu pitfire,
mittlerweile ist es ein Zaun.
pitfire (2025-04-29 13:06:53+00:00): Zaun mit Tor oder komplett geschlossen?
Brummi2021 (2025-04-29 14:02:13+00:00): Zu, komplett, 2m hoch
Andrea Musuruane (2025-04-29 11:01:05+00:00): Ciao. Dal sito internet vedo che vende direttamente miele. Dovrebbe essere quindi shop=honey e non craft+beekeeper. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165577463
kartler175 (2025-04-29 13:28:22+00:00): oneway ergibt keinen Sinn bei Flächen
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9921601
NorthCrab_upload (2025-04-29 07:20:55+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Wartość addr:place zawiera błąd w pisowni. Upewnij się, czy wielkość liter jest poprawna, oraz czy nigdzie nie ma dodatkowych znaków.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12273365414

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2025-04-29 07:30:50+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Podana kombinacja addr:city + addr:place jest nieprawidłowa. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, usuń addr:place i zastosuj kombinację addr:city + addr:street. Jeśli nie, pozostaw tylko addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5872011816
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11380366488

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
silversurfer83 (2025-04-29 10:57:51+00:00): Hi :)

da hier ein VZ240 steht war es vorher schon korrekt erfasst. "Pfad" sieht zwar erstmal nicht ganz korrekt aus, ist aber im Wiki entsprechend dokumentiert. 
Also: VZ240 wird idR zu highway=path + foot=designated + bicycle=designated

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dpath

Grüße aus Korbach :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165577954
silversurfer83 (2025-04-29 11:41:15+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165586687
phlustik (2025-05-04 15:45:23+00:00): Ahoj,
toto je další Tvoje mazání v oblasti zaniklých obcí ve VÚ Libavá, zde Velká Střelná, kde jsi smazal mj. ruiny budov, které reálně existují OTG (skryty ve stromech) a viditelné cesty.
Tvoje změny jsem revertoval:
osm.org/changeset/165806500
Příště prosím o konzultaci autora nebo místní komunity předtím, než bys plánoval mazat "od PC".
Děkuji.
SafwatHalaby (2025-04-29 12:23:38+00:00): Welcome to OSM, thank you for the contribution!

It looks you added an object which is already present.

You added: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12797262725

Already present:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/622014829

The building is a more accurate mapping than the new point you added. I think you should remove your point, and mark the existing building as a mall. 

Also, have a look at the basic guide for Israel: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/HE:Israel

Feel free to reply if there are questions.
SafwatHalaby (2025-04-29 12:25:56+00:00): ברוך הבא ל-OSM, תודה על התרומה!

נראה שהוספת אובייקט שכבר קיים.

הוספת:
osm.org/node/12797262725

כבר קיים:
osm.org/way/622014829

המבנה הקיים הוא מיפוי מדויק יותר מהנקודה החדשה שהוספת. אני חושב שכדאי לך להסיר את הנקודה שלך ולסמן את המבנה הקיים כקניון.

כמו כן, כדאי לראות את המדריך הבסיסי לישראל: osm.wiki/HE:Israel

אם יש שאלות, נשמח לעזור!
SafwatHalaby (2025-04-29 12:27:12+00:00): שולח מחדש עם לינקים תקינים

ברוך הבא ל-OSM, תודה על התרומה!

נראה שהוספת אובייקט שכבר קיים.

הוספת:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12797262725

כבר קיים:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/622014829

המבנה הקיים הוא מיפוי מדויק יותר מהנקודה החדשה שהוספת. אני חושב שכדאי לך להסיר את הנקודה שלך ולסמן את המבנה הקיים כקניון.

כמו כן, כדאי לראות את המדריך הבסיסי לישראל: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/HE:Israel

אם יש שאלות, נשמח לעזור!
SafwatHalaby (2025-05-04 13:50:24+00:00): Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165801319
yt2178 (2025-05-14 08:03:09+00:00): לא הבנתי מה לעשות
yt2178 (2025-05-14 08:03:52+00:00): אני מתחיל בזה בגלל שעד עכשיו ערכתי עם הטלפון ועכשיו אני עם מחשב ואין לי מושג איך להשתמש
SafwatHalaby (2025-05-14 13:24:06+00:00): שלום, הבעיה עם הקניון תוקנה. אם אתה מעוניין לערוך מהמחשב אולי זה יעזור:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/HE:Israel


תרגיש חופשי לשאול אם משהו לא מובן!
Andrea Musuruane (2025-04-29 12:55:57+00:00): Ciao. Non mi sembra venda formaggi ma ortaggi. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165578233
Andrea Musuruane (2025-04-29 12:54:36+00:00): Ciao. Dal sito web non sembra venda vino. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165578349
Andrea Musuruane (2025-04-29 12:53:38+00:00): Ciao. Azienda Agricola Vitivinicola etichettata con shop=cheese? Mi sembra strano. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165578452
XtnW (2025-05-03 23:35:44+00:00): Hallo, ich habe vor kurzem die Skirouten 170 und 177 wieder als Skirouten auf die Karte gesetzt, damit die OSM-Karte wieder mit der Pistenkarte von Ski Arlberg übereinstimmt. Mich würde interessieren, was Ihr Grund war, die Skirouten 170 und 177 wieder in Skipisten umzuwandeln? Ich habe in der Vergangenheit gesehen, dass Sie die Pisten als Skirouten auf der Karte eingezeichnet haben.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165578521
StantonPfarri25 (2025-05-04 11:00:00+00:00): Hallo, das mit den Skirouten ist so eine Sache, manche werden nicht präpariert, manche regelmäßig und manche sporadisch. Die 170 und die 177 sind immer peäpariert, drum hab ich das so eingetragen. Ich wollte in der Vergangenheit einfach alle Skirouten auf "Off-Pist-Gelände" einstellen, jedoch machten andere User in der Vergangenheit Probleme, jetzt mache ich das nur noch bei Skirouten, die nicht präpariert werden. Und die anderen trage ich jetzt  wie Pisten ein, damit alle zufrieden sind. Bitte nimm die Änderung zurück, da ich zurzeit alle präparierten  Pisten/Skirouten am Arlberg mit Pylogonen versehe, der Aufwand ist immens.
XtnW (2025-05-04 13:18:01+00:00): Selbstverständlich akzeptiere ich die neuesten Änderungen, insbesondere wenn sie sorgfältig durchdacht sind. Leider bietet OSM keine andere Möglichkeit zur Unterscheidung zwischen Skipisten und Skirouten als die Einstellung "piste:grooming". Dies führt dazu, dass unpräparierte Pisten manchmal fälschlicherweise mit Skirouten in Verbindung gebracht werden. Gibt es übrigens für Ski Arlberg (Online-)Informationen darüber, welche Skirouten präpariert sind und welche nicht? Oder lässt sich dies nur durch die physische Anwesenheit vor Ort feststellen?
StantonPfarri25 (2025-05-04 14:03:26+00:00): Hallo, es ist leider nicht ersichtlich, welche Skirouten präpariert werden oder nicht - man muss ortskundig sein.

Ich hatte mal die Skiroute Schindlerkar auf  nicht präpariert eingestellt und eine ganz böse Nachricht erhalten, dass man mich wegen Vandalismus gemeldet hat ...

Entweder wir machen es so, und du kannst mir gerne helfen, die Skirouten alle auf nicht präpariert einzustellen, oder es so machen, wie ich es zuvor gemacht habe, nach der tatsächlichen Gegebenheit, natürlich auch gerne mit Hilfe.