piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
custodiankeyy (2025-07-16 23:30:05+00:00): Merhaba! name etiketini bulunduğunuz bölgede kullanılan dil ile doldurun. Eğer oranın kullanılan (resmi veya değil) bir ingilizce adı varsa onu name:en etiketi için kullanabilirsiniz. Çevirici kullanmayın.

Ayrıca bir bölgenin alanını çizerken dışarı taşmamaya çalışın. Örneğin eklediğiniz futbol, basketbol ve tenis sahasını ayrı ayrı tam olarak sahanın etrafını çevirecek şekilde yapın. Düzelttiğim değişiklik setine bakın.
---
Hello! Fill in the name tag with the language used in your region. If there is an English name (official or unofficial) used in that region, you can use it for the name:en tag. Do not use translator.

Also, try not to go outside the area when drawing a region. For example, make sure that the football, basketball, and tennis courts you add are drawn separately and completely enclose the area of the court. Take a look at the set of changes I made.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169036420
yann PNR Vercors (2025-10-08 14:01:17+00:00): salut, est ce que je peux modifier ta trace au niveau pour l'accès au sud du Canyon des Gueulards ?
il s'agit de ce way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1415231869
je viens d'obtenir la trace GPS par l'écogarde du secteur. mais avant de faire la modif je voulais être sûr que tu n'avais pas déjà fait le job avec un GPS type RTK
merci
esteban713 (2025-10-08 14:14:56+00:00): Bonjour, oui tu peux mettre à jour. Je l'ai ajouté de mémoire par rapport à la végétation car il n'y avait rien. Merci
ivanbranco (2025-07-28 12:10:07+00:00): Ciao Damcan,

come mai hai rimosso il tag wikipedia, opening_hours e website?
NeisRevert (2025-07-17 08:47:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/169049646
where the changeset comment is: 
Remove vandalism
Langlaeufer (2025-07-20 17:43:10+00:00): Hallo cris. Warum hast du cycleway:left=no entfernt?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169029782
chris66 (2025-07-21 06:58:27+00:00): Hi, wurde schon repariert. Als KISS Mapper halte ich viele dieser xy=no Tags für überflüssig. 

Grüße
Chris
Langlaeufer (2025-07-21 08:07:58+00:00): Jupp, ohne werden allerdings SC Mapper genötigt was einzugeben und machen ggf korrekte Daten kaput
NeisRevert (2025-07-17 08:51:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/169049780
where the changeset comment is: 
Remove vandalism
NeisRevert (2025-07-17 08:45:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/169049565
where the changeset comment is: 
Remove vandalism
yrtimiD (2025-07-16 22:39:53+00:00): Hi, regarding your question, there is a comfortable app to collect street view images - Mapillary. In general it mostly used to collect tracks, but it also has a nice feature of taking single image. If you'll use it to catch new places - other mappers will also be able to use these photos for their mapping. This provider is fully approved for OSM usage and nicely integrated in many popular editors.

app link is: https://www.mapillary.com/app

Here is my personal example where I took a picture of bomb shelter to later map it: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1027066689507715

there are more similar platforms https://kartaview.org/map and https://mapilio.com/app but only Mapillary allows single-picture mode.
Leo Slager (2025-07-17 11:18:32+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Lucas Santana (2025-07-16 21:51:27+00:00): de acordo com https://sistemas.betim.mg.gov.br/geoweb/atlas o bairro se chama DISTRITO INDUSTRIAL BARREIRO DE CIMA/NORTE existe a Rua Bispo Pedro Valdemar Dias cep 32685-200 que pertence a esse bairro que eu tive que adaptar o contorno
Lucas Santana (2025-07-16 21:54:14+00:00): https://zeus.betim.mg.gov.br/geoserver/web/?wicket:bookmarkablePage=:org.geoserver.web.demo.MapPreviewPage o arquivo 	betimtaurus:UP pertence anova nomeclatura de bairros ``favor usar https://buscacepinter.correios.com.br/app/endereco/index.php para contornos diferentes do normal do arquivo
NeisBot (2025-07-16 19:37:34+00:00): Hi pat-lachute, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 3 natural(s)
- 2 landuse(')

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=169030155
samho1234567 (2025-07-17 02:09:58+00:00): It's my typo. 😅
ChrissW-R1 (2025-10-02 19:57:17+00:00): You're welcome.
user_5359 (2025-07-17 09:18:48+00:00): Hello! Please hvae a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1415255885. What is the mean of this tags (no  additional OSM keys)?
Константин Гам (2025-08-08 10:19:55+00:00): Здравствуйте! Пришлите пожалуйста фото дорожного знака "движение на велосипеде запрещено" с данной тропы, что-то я сомневаюсь в его наличии, хотя вы его вносите в данные.
Ruffian (2025-09-03 07:03:56+00:00): Знака нет, но и на велосипеде там проехать невозможно.
Константин Гам (2025-09-03 08:13:36+00:00): Это не отмечается тегом bicycle.

Используйте surface, smoothness. 

А еще велосипеды бывают полноприводные)
Wolderik (2025-07-21 21:21:48+00:00): Vintage Kappers stond al op de kaart (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2929769240). Het is nu extra toegevoegd op adres Molengracht 64, terwijl het adres Eindhovensweg 64 is.
A67-A67 (2025-07-23 19:26:50+00:00): Bedankt. Ik heb de informatie verplaatst naar de juiste adresnode.
mueschel (2025-07-27 17:12:49+00:00): Hallo,
du hast zwei Mal "ref:uic" hinzugefügt, mit einem anderen Wert als "uic_ref". Kannst du das prüfen?
TheNewCivilian (2025-07-27 19:05:27+00:00): Oh danke für den Hinweis! Da bin ich wohl durcheinander gekommen. Nach Rücksprache mit den bei der DB verantwortlichen Personen für stations IDs würde ich auch vorschlagen statt ref:ibnr, ref:eva zu nutzen, da das die fachlich korrekte Bezeichnung zu sein seint. Ich bastle gerade an einem Tool, dass dann auch manuelle Reviews von Stations Ids erleichtern sollte.
TheNewCivilian (2025-07-27 19:09:13+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169575844#map=12/48.6838/15.6046
NorthCrab_upload (2025-07-16 20:51:03+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2560871996
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/249596361

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NeisBot (2025-07-16 20:51:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
raman7699 (2025-07-16 21:02:10+00:00): Thanks for the feedback! I updated the description to follow OSM guidelines and removed any promotional language.
NeisReview (2025-07-18 06:15:37+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/169033088
jeslop (2025-07-21 15:12:49+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169249884
berndw (2025-07-18 21:35:32+00:00): Hallo Fyngem

willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.

Du hast einen Review deier Änderungen angeklickt, deswegen ein paar Bemerkungen.

Dein anderer Änderungsatz ist grundsätzlich in Ordnung, dieser hier ist etwas problematisch bezüglich der Zugangsregeln.
Ich kenne die Gegend aber nicht diesen Weg speziell. Grundsätzlich gilt aber nur was vor Ort ausgeschildert ist.

Vz 250 wäre Verbot für alle Fahrzeuge incl Fahrrad
Vz 260 Verbot für Motorfahrzeuge.

Aber das gesetzte access=no verbietet alles, du hebst es aber mit foot=yes und bicycle=yes teilweise auf.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access

horse=* sollte auch nur gesetzt werden, wenn die entsprechende Beschilderung vorhanden ist und reiten erlaubt oder verboten ist.

Besser ist es immer, nur die jeweilige Beschilderung auszuwerten und alle anderen Werte nicht zu setzen, überlass die leeren Felder ruhig den Routern, die setzen das für sich passend.

Falls Dir die Verkehrszeichen nicht geläufig sind, hier ein Link dazu.

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bildtafel_der_Verkehrszeichen_in_der_Bundesrepublik_Deutschland_seit_2017

Im Wiki steht noch mehr zu diesem Thema, lies Dich ruhig vorher etwas ein.


Für Fragen stehe ich gerne zur Verfügung

Bernd
berndw (2025-07-24 15:46:34+00:00): Da sich dort nichts feststellen lässt, das ein access=no begrümdet, habe ich die entsprechenden Restriktionen entfernt.
literan (2025-07-17 19:27:37+00:00): не надо ОРАТЬ
gscscnd (2025-07-17 04:41:58+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/834117082
Budynek z nazwą, przydałoby się office lub coś podobnego.
gscscnd (2025-07-17 04:47:07+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/309140999
Mamy jakieś lepsze źródło niż Radio 90? Może ten odcinek nie ma nazwy?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/111329660
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1415267972
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history
NeisBot (2025-07-16 21:27:50+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-07-20 05:30:48+00:00): Corrected by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169047238
and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169081266
user_5359 (2025-07-17 13:51:28+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/13005273926. Please use lowercase keys!
lenny32 (2025-08-25 08:41:16+00:00): dans https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:memorial:conflict?uselang=fr WW1;WW2 séparés par ; et non ,
PèreForez (2025-08-25 09:36:32+00:00): Merci pour ton signalement ; c'est corrigé
NeisBot (2025-07-16 21:39:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-07-20 05:31:29+00:00): Corrected by osm.org/changeset/169047238
and osm.org/changeset/169081266
rempshaener (2025-07-17 18:37:27+00:00): Hallo,

du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
An der Fläche ist deutlich zu viel dran: die Adressfragmente, der Name etc. – das wird in dieser Form nicht benötigt oder ist teilweise (basin=rasenfläche) falsch. Am besten entfernst du alles bis auf „note“ und ergänzt ein einfaches landuse=grass. Das dürfte reichen.

Bei Fragen bitte melden.
Viele Grüße
StC (2025-08-07 07:15:01+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire de randonnée qui passe par là. Je m'occupe de la réparation.
AndreaDp271 (2025-07-28 09:30:23+00:00): Thank you for your contribution but try to make smaller changeset areas. Thank you. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169034493
eigenval (2025-07-16 21:53:24+00:00): source: survey
gscscnd (2025-07-17 04:40:07+00:00): Trochę za dużo problemów, wycofuję:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169041415

1. Droga Regionalna jeszcze nie jest otwarta, podniesienie Sportowej z tertiary do primary to obecnie przesada.
2. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1415273060
Był kompletny adres, zrobiłeś niekompletny.
3. highway=bus_stop nie wymaga bus=yes. Zmień edytor na JOSM.
Una tantum (2025-07-21 07:53:42+00:00): Ciao, per il municipio se n'è discusso in questa nota, siamo sicuri della collocazione della sede? https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4847853
gscscnd (2025-07-17 04:35:31+00:00): Typowe dla dróg leśnych z typowym zakazem: bicycle=yes, horse=forestry, vehicle=forestry. (Nie jest to jedyna szkoła.)

Mamy Geoportal, nie używaj Mapbox. Mamy JOSM, nie używaj iD.
Sylabowy Kot (2025-07-17 07:41:15+00:00): Spokojnie, bartekpacia dokonał dopiero kilka zmian w OSM, więc wypadało by pozytywniej go zachęcić do takich metod. Patrz najpierw na staż krytykowanej osoby.

JOSM owszem jest lepszy od iD, ale tak prostą ścieżkę da się przeboleć, że została zrobiona w przeglądarkowym edytorze. Natomiast Mapbox też się mocno przydaje przy mapowaniu akurat na obszarach zalesionych, gdyż w wielu miejscach mają zdjęcia satelitarne w okresie mniejszej rozłożystości listowia i do tego w lepszej jakości, niż Geoportal. Tu widzę, że jak najbardziej mógł się przydać do weryfikacji, a iD podaje jako źródło akurat ostatnio wybrany podkład zdjęciowy, a nie wszystkie wybierane podczas edycji. Więc luz.
Bartek_Wojak (2025-07-17 09:12:11+00:00): Hej, dzięki wielkie za popatrzenie na moje zmiany:) (moja pierwsza kontrybucja do OSM).

Nie wiedziałem o istnieniu JOSM – rozumiem że pewnie jest fajnym toolem dla power userów, ale mi na początek iD chyba starczy. Zapewne po prostu jeszcze "nie wiem jak dużo nie wiem".

(A, no i nie wiedziałem że w changesecie widać że użyłem MapBoxa i iD :) )
gscscnd (2025-07-17 11:41:15+00:00): Sylabowy Kot: dzięki za rozwinięcie tematu, nie miałem czasu na rozpisywanie się. Nie miała to być krytyka a zestaw porad, byłem świadomy stażu, na pewno można było napisać ładniej, ale nie zawsze się da. Cieszę się, że jest ktoś nowy, życzę miłego mapowania 😉
hamare_raaz (2025-07-16 22:12:06+00:00): They certainly existed, so if they no longer exist, wouldn't it be better to mark them decommisioned?
eerib (2025-07-17 00:30:46+00:00): I reverted your original edit because I was able to confirm that these trails exist and that people have recently used the trails. Strava, AllTrails, and TrailForks all show recent activity data for these trails.

You can learn more about why you can't just delete trails you don't want on the map by reading this wiki page.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F
JimmyJones999 (2025-07-17 00:40:36+00:00): " Strava, AllTrails, and TrailForks all show recent activity data for these trails."
These aren't on these mapping platforms, the data isn't reliable. Continuing to keep these trails is misleading and dangerous.
eerib (2025-07-17 00:57:39+00:00): You're welcome to submit a dispute to the Data Working Group. - data@openstreetmap.org

Alternatively, you can add metadata to the trails such as the IMBA rating and Swiss Alpine Club grading to provide more context into the difficulty of the trails.
JimmyJones999 (2025-07-17 01:06:58+00:00): You could just stop being so damaging to the mtb community and leave your hobby to the communities that want your efforts? 

You've considered that your and OSM’s blanket belief in mapping what exists on the ground lacks nuance when dealing with sensitive land use, right?

Land ownership and rights: Many unauthorized trails are built on private land, First Nations territory, or in protected areas without permission. Mapping them potentially implicates OSM contributors in violating property rights.

Conservation efforts: Trails in ecologically sensitive zones are often kept unpublicized to prevent erosion, habitat disruption, and overuse. Publishing their location undermines efforts by local stewards, conservation groups, and land managers.

By mapping a trail that is officially closed, unsanctioned, or dangerous, yu may unintentionally encourage use exposing themselves, the project, or others to liability in the case of injury or damage.

Mapping isn’t ethically neutral. It has real-world consequences and pretending otherwise is dangerous.

Trail builds often explicitly ask for trails to be kept off Strava etc, what gives you any right to ignore them to publicize what they've built? Especially if trails have been build with low user numbers in mind. 

In my opinion, mapping “what is on the ground” without local input is a form of digital overreach. It gives users a superiority complex but does nothing to benefit the users of the trail systems in mind. 

You've clearly had this discussion before, so I fully expect it to fall on deaf ears. But to repeat, your online actives are harmful to the local people that enjoy these trails and mapping them conveys to benefit to anyone other than yourself.
JimmyJones999 (2025-07-17 01:07:57+00:00): Suggesting IMBA rating and Swiss Alpine Club also shows how little you know about the local context here. This is laughable.
eerib (2025-07-17 01:16:30+00:00): You're welcome to provide your stance and suggest policy & tagging changes in the OpenStreetMap Community Forum.

https://community.openstreetmap.org
hamare_raaz (2025-07-17 06:15:25+00:00): I mean, you're kidding yourself either way if you don't think WB knows about Butter Chicken (which is CRA), and Black Shark has no land issues. These trails have been here for years and are unlikely to go anywhere. Mapping truly sensitive trails (e.g. on private property or First Nation-managed land) is a different discussion than mapping trails that are well-known. There's no no-Strava, etc. signs at the top of Butter Chicken.
JimmyJones999 (2025-07-17 16:16:40+00:00): @eerib - I see you're hiding behind policy rather than attempting to justify your own damaging behaviour. I cant say I'm surprised. 

@hamare - WB let trails exist in the CRA when they dont cause issues. Mapping trails which are other wise secret or shown, dont tell trails encourages users who are in not equipped to ride those trails on to them. There's a reason things like Upper Babalyon arent on Trailforks anymore. All this is going to do is lead to encourage WB to take a stronger stance against building in the CRA, which they've already highlighted as being problematic, see the history of Dark Crystal for example. 
The trails are are not well known, maybe in small local riding groups, but then they dont need the map in the first place. Absolutely nothing good is happening here.
eerib (2025-07-17 16:48:52+00:00): The reality is is that you're not the first person to want stuff removed from OpenStreetMap. Requests come in to remove all sorts of stuff including laughable requests to remove official sanctioned trails because they're "too busy", official emergency cabins because "it might get used incorrectly", and even innocuous things like boat launches because "it's meant for locals". This is why OpenStreetMap has a policy and has even gotten so frustrated with repeating why it exists that someone has created a wiki page to provide the rationale for it. You're more than welcome to post your opinion on the OpenStreetMap Community Forum to get a better understanding of why the policy exists.

OpenStreetMap has the Trails Working Group whom works with park agencies, land owners, app developers, trail associations, and others to further develop the tagging schema to handle the issues you mentioned.

- Land ownership is handled through marking trails with their legal access.
- Conservation related to sensitive trails is handled through marking trails as sanctioned/unsanctioned.
- Difficult trails is handled through marking trails with the Swiss Alpine Club rating and/or IMBA rating.

You might not know this but most of TrailForks tagging schema is based on OpenStreetMap's.

Speaking of TrailForks, TrailForks is owned by Outside Inc a venture capital and private equity behemoth that wants complete control over outdoor information. The only thing preventing companies like Outside from locking features behind paywalls and jacking up fees is the free opensource database provided by OpenStreetMap. TrailForks allows trails and other features to be hidden for no rhyme or reason. There is no policies. In some locations the government now has administrative access to TrailForks or has significance influence on the trail association and therefore controls what is shown on TrailForks. It’s only a matter of time before TrailForks only shows what is approved by the government. OpenStreetMap balances this control.

The easiest solution is for you and others you know that disagree with OpenStreetMap's policy is to boycott products that use OpenStreetMap. Close your eyes, walk away from the computer, and switch to back to NTS topo maps.

Continued vandalism will not be tolerated.
Taya_S (2025-07-17 17:15:33+00:00): Please see 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18460
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18461
MomentSkiGuy (2025-07-17 17:59:24+00:00): "Continued vandalism will not be tolerated." - I see no vandalism here. 
What I do see is 1 particular user hiding behind OSM policy and refusing to engage with a legit discussion around what is or isnt appropriate to be mapped. |

"The easiest solution is for you and others you know that disagree with OpenStreetMap's policy is to boycott products that use OpenStreetMap"

This doesnt solve the underlying problem at all. And I think you know that. 
You think you're providing a public service but are actually doing the opposite. 
When someone hurts themselves on a previously secret trail that riders would find when they were ready, thats on you. When areas and trails get shut down due to injury and overuse, that will be on you.  Jimmy was right, mapping isnt a neutral activity, it has real life consequences that aren't always positive.
Taya_S (2025-07-17 18:28:02+00:00): Creating multiple sockpuppet accounts, repeatedly deleting data and targeting a specific user is absolutely considered vandalism.

These vandal accounts clearly want these trails to exist in real life. They want to use the trails, yet at the same time they're complaining about how mapping these trails could damage habitats, increase erosion, or even destroy archaeological sites.

They talk about people getting injured or endangering themselves and yet at the same time they're ignoring how mapping a trail can prevent people from getting lost or how they can be used by search and rescue to find missing people.

What I am seeing here is a bunch of people that want to enjoy the trails they created on land they don't own and are getting upset about other people that also don't own this land also using said trails. That is not a valid argument, that's just entitlement.

Best regards,
Taya Snijder
MomentSkiGuy (2025-07-17 18:53:49+00:00): The only entitlement i see here is that of OSM and it's 'power users'. You are have no local knowledge of context of these trails, how trail advocacy, planning, building and relationships are playing out or are deliberately not paying attention. 

I looked at the banned list have no idea who the banned accounts, especially ones targeting a specific user. 

Mountain biking has a long history 'show, don't tell' and thats to ensure that riders are ready to ride these unmarked/unsanctioned trails, to ensure they don't get shut down, to limit the damage done to the environment and the trail itself.

Emergency services here already have access to a mapping platform that provides the details of these trails that should remain off map. OSM pushing to ensure that everything is public all the time and refusing to engage in legit discussions around locally sensitive trails and areas is astonishing.
tordans (2025-07-25 15:47:06+00:00): FYI: Ich habe in diesem Bereich zwei Mal korrektur-gemapped. Zuletzt in https://osmcha.org/changesets/169235327
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169034752