piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Jrachi (2024-01-08 06:07:48+00:00): Se il ref è "necessario" sulle way sarebbe scritto. Invece è un elemento facoltativo.
Non dico che sia un tuo modo di mappare, ma che è un modo di mappare antiquato, usato ancora da qualcuno.
In comunità ne abbiamo discusso e non esiste una soluzione definitiva.
L'unica cosa su cui siamo d'accordo è che il ref quando presente non andrebbe tolto necessariamente, ma essendo inutile, è più corretto non aggiungerlo se manca.
Ma mi inchino al volere della maggioranza e cerco di non ostinarmi a usare le pagine wiki per interpretarle alla mia maniera.
Non tutte le strade hanno necessariamente un nome. E nessuno si dovrebbe inventare un nome, come usare il nome della località che raggiunge, solo per evitare che la mappa sia bianca. La mappa deve riportare la realtà.
Fedurli (2024-01-09 00:46:39+00:00): La mappa deve riportare la realtà, è esattamente l'utilità del ref "antiquato". Se tu non inserisci il ref way, sulla mappa non appare proprio nulla, bensì una strada vuota, perché ciò che è inserito nelle relazioni non è visibile sulla mappa. Quindi non c'è nulla di antiquato, sono semplicemente due cose differenti.
Jrachi (2024-01-09 07:43:30+00:00): Giusto sono due cose differenti.
1) È il nome della strada, deliberato dal comune competente. Se non c'è non si deve inventare
2) Il ref è una proprietà della relazione e non della way
citrula (2024-01-05 02:43:40+00:00): Nice work ! Happy mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145903500
julcnx (2024-04-26 04:47:43+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM! I noticed you classified a way as a major highway link, but I've adjusted it to a service road based on our guidelines. You can learn more about highway classifications in Thailand by visiting the wiki page below. If you have any questions or need further assistance, please feel free to reach out. Cheers! https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Thailand#Highway_classification
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145903604
sen_takeya (2024-01-05 07:46:49+00:00): Revert Vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145909577
Enock4seth (2024-01-05 18:22:12+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Kindly learn how OpenStreetMap works and what you can usefully contribute. This kind of change doesn't help OpenStreetMap. Don't change objects if you don't know what they are. I have reverted this contribution.

Find more about OSM and how to get started at https://welcome.openstreetmap.org/
tastrax (2024-01-05 04:22:02+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features 

To get the + symbol on a mobile device numeric keypad I reckon you will need to do a LONG press on the zero.
I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
Supaplex (2024-01-05 10:06:26+00:00): Hi

好像你的編輯變動並非實際的變動內容，而且把地點點位脫到沒有住宅的農地當中
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145904458
Enock4seth (2024-01-05 18:29:07+00:00): Don't just delete objects if you don't know what they represent.

The deleted line was part of an administrative boundary relation.
tyfi (2024-01-05 03:46:20+00:00): I also bumped Route NN to tertiary since it connects to a 2-digit numbered state route and serves as a main street of Parnell.
user_12523467 (2024-01-05 05:57:30+00:00): thanks for the update, lucky you!, you have Maxar SecureWatch Imagery 2023-11-24, we at Iraq OSM are struggling with outdated imagery.
tyfi (2024-01-05 04:17:32+00:00): I also moved it north of Chestnut Street because the GNIS import 15yrs ago had it wrongly placed.
citrula (2024-01-05 05:16:40+00:00): There's a list of some known values for fitness_station on the wiki, ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:fitness_station ) , and if these don't fit you can make one of your own. However, please don't use the name field to describe the object. See: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145905170
archie (2024-01-05 07:03:27+00:00): Hej, du har i changeset (cs) https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=145905682 flyttat en del stigar.
 De stigar som du flyttat - till numera fel position - har importerats (titta gärna på kommentarer till tidigare edits på objekt som du hanterar) från NVDB, dvs den nationella databasen (https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=128240569).
 Man får förmoda att positioneringen därför är så korrekt som den kan bli. En koll mot Lantmäteriets ortofoto bekräftar detta och blottlägger samtidigt att du flyttat stigarna till fel position.
 Felpositioneringen från din sida framgår även tydligt när du tittar på stigen i nordväst som före din edit gick förbi skylten "Information Treudden" men efter din olyckliga edit tar en vid båge förbi skylten. Man skulle förmoda att skylten satts upp intill stigen för att informera användare av densamma.
 Är det så att stigens sträckning nyligen ändrats, eller har skylten flyttats i sen tid ? Eller hur kan du förklara att stigens sträckning enligt din mening går så pass långt från skylten.
 På mig verkar det som att en bra placering av de stigar som du flyttat har försämrats genom din edit. Kan du avkräfta min uppfattning i detta avseende?
Erik Hagelberg (2024-01-05 07:34:00+00:00): Hej, jag tror knappast att NVDB-datat har mätts upp en GIS-ingenjör hos Lantmäteriet utan är gamla OSM-data, som jag ritade in 2013-12-09 från eget singletrack-GPS-data. Nu har jag har korrigerat efter aggregerat Strava-data (eftersom man INTE ser stigarna på ortofoto) som ju faktiskt stämmer bättre med verkligheten. Jag går där dagligen eftersom jag bor här och skylten står där den alltid gjort och stigen jag ändrade är inte ens i närheten av skylten. Skylten sitter i anslutning till själva gravplatsen (Treudden). Nu stämmer det bättre än innan, men du är välkommen att åka ut och kontrollmäta :)
Erik Hagelberg (2024-01-05 07:34:39+00:00): Jag avsåg såklart stigarna, när jag menade NVDB-datat.
archie (2024-01-05 07:49:25+00:00): Ok, om du säger det, men jag menar att man kan tydligt se t ex  cykelvägen (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/330987773) på ortofoto och visst hade den bättre positionering innan du flyttade den; helt ärligt. Jämför: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=145905682
gscholz (2024-01-06 08:30:09+00:00): Hi  JLOSM,
this changeset has created errors regarding self intersecting and displaced ways:


https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-79.38356&lat=-5.67265&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=145905721

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2024-01-08 08:10:48+00:00): Hi JLOSM, 
this error still exits, can I get your feedback here?
Guido
JLOSM (2024-01-10 15:35:33+00:00): Hola Guido,

Apenas ley los mensajes esta madrugada.
Cancha corregida.
Gracias por avisarme.
nzy37h0b0 (2024-01-31 00:56:54+00:00): There is something weird going on with the residential areas added around here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1237178716
snoozingnewt (2024-02-02 04:34:45+00:00): That's because I'm pretty sure the import workflow cut residential areas by roads, which makes sense in most cases but not these edge ones. Definitely something to fix though.
nevw (2024-01-05 10:21:43+00:00): Hi, there are two post boxes mapped very close to each other here. Are you able to resolve which one is correct and adjust the position more accurately and delete the redundant one.
nevw (2024-01-06 05:29:45+00:00): Hi, your position was correct, so I merged the tags from both to the one you mapped in this changeset
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145944901
Frans S (2024-01-05 15:01:44+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. However, many buildings were not squared.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145907417
Dimitar155 (2024-01-15 22:01:24+00:00): Привет [diffER],

Всичко е наред с тази промяна.

При минаване през малката уличка до бл. 234, коя посока е с предимство? Посока блок 1Е или посока блок 235?

Поздрави,
Митко
[diffER] (2024-01-15 22:31:23+00:00): Идвайки от бл. 235 покрай бл. 234 към бл. 1Е сте с предимство. 🙂
Dimitar155 (2024-01-16 15:47:21+00:00): Благодаря за отговора! Добавих нужния таг.
martianfreeloader (2024-01-05 22:56:41+00:00): Hi Ana,

Thanks for joining OSM. You seem to have a made a mistake here: You tagged all the nodes of the bathing area instead of only tagging the way that is made up by these nodes.
martianfreeloader (2024-01-12 11:24:55+00:00): Looks like a mistake. I've removed the tags from the nodes. https://www.osm.org/changeset/146177204
gscholz (2024-01-07 09:16:00+00:00): Hi rajanik,
this changeset has created overlapping ways; a service way on layer -1 which is now connected at several points with an other private service way on layer 0 are causing the issue here:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=77.20691&lat=28.55722&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=145907938

This kind of error irritates routing software. Can you please fix this?

Kind regards
Guido
rajanik (2024-01-09 05:24:05+00:00): Hi Guido ,  Thanks for yours feedback, this changeset is not producible this is already change by the another user the changeset is 145982950.
Black_Diamond (2024-01-05 07:17:31+00:00): Actually, the Cupertino GIS says that the Santa Clara Tax assessor information about the property with the Westminester address is actually Westminster like the rest of the addresses. So this is confirmed to be correct by the Cupertino GIS information.

https://gis.cupertino.org/propertyinfo/?level=16&center=-13588756.721892135,4484468.512280379,102100
mavl (2024-01-17 18:49:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 146369748 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
rene78 (2024-01-12 00:54:53+00:00): Hi Thomas,

I guess something went wrong with this boundary. It is not closed.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1237203122

Maybe you can have another look.

Cheers
Rene
Dimacn (2024-01-06 05:42:02+00:00): Пожалуйста не ставьте дубли точек
Aleks-Berlin (2024-01-08 17:03:38+00:00): Hi Eric Bie,
please read:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:wikipedia
Merci, Alex
Eric Bie (2024-08-05 20:50:04+00:00): Merci
mgerken (2024-01-07 22:22:49+00:00): Moin,
ich habe bei der Brücke in Achim Ost die leichte Kurve wieder eingefügt, da der Verlauf da nicht ganz gerade ist.
Beste Grüße
Raana02 (2024-01-07 22:54:13+00:00): Super :-)
MichS (2024-01-06 11:23:20+00:00): Hallo,

access haben sie nun auf unknown geändert, ich nehme an auf meine Frage aus dem vorangegangenen CS hin.

Ist der highway=footway mit dem Zeichen 239 ausgeschildert?

Welche Beschilderung gibt es dort?

MFG
MichS (2024-01-06 11:26:11+00:00): Bei highway=footway ist foot=yes nicht nötig.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dfootway
schuppka (2024-01-06 13:25:43+00:00): Danke für Ihre Hinweise.
Es gibt dort keine Beschilderung. Es ist ein einfacher Weg, der eine Verbindung zwischen den zwei anderen Wegen herstellt und nur vereinzelt von Traktoren benutzt wird. MfG
MichS (2024-01-07 17:11:16+00:00): Nun habe ich den Weg nach Luftbild (bing und esri) in der Lage ausgerichtet und zu path geändert die Breite habe ich auf 2 m geschätzt. Der Weg hat einen anderen Winkel zu den Wegen im Norden und Süden.
schuppka (2024-01-07 17:36:12+00:00): Danke!
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-05 08:10:24+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11478713852

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
s8evq (2025-09-01 12:33:17+00:00): Beste,
Bestaat deze doorsteek werkelijk reeds? (alsook de kazerne)? Op recente luchtbeelden is nog niets te zien.
nevw (2024-01-05 10:43:56+00:00): Hi Rohan, I think you may have caused error in the boundary as depicted here
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=116.06038&lat=-31.90927&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways
Also can see a red deleted section here that may have caused the error
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=145910060
The Goat Farm Mountain Bike Park is a Capad protected area with boundary gazetted by the government so normally best to leave as it as not desirable to edit from satellite imary.
nevw (2024-01-05 10:44:50+00:00): Comment here if you want me to reverted it.
nevw (2024-01-05 10:45:28+00:00): …excuse my typos.
nevw (2024-01-07 12:35:12+00:00): Hi Rohan I see you have reverted the changes to the two protected areas in the area.
I have been looking at the web site for Goat Farm Mountain Bike Park and it appears to cover part of both the nature reserve and the national park.
If this is the case I think you could map the bike park boundary separately with it’s own tags.
nevw (2024-01-09 22:42:22+00:00): Hi Rohan
I added the area that is used as the Goat Farm Mountain Bike Park as a recreational area. It overlaps a small part of the northwest corner of the Greenmount National Park and almost all of the adjacent reserve area. 
Feel free to adjust the boundary or delete/replace it as you are probably familiar with the area.
sweaty_techie (2024-01-09 23:47:07+00:00): Legend. That's exactly the change I was trying to complete, but after duplicating the reserve and removing a boundary I couldn't get it to line up a duplicate of the national park boundary in that area. I'll keep playing to get it figured out, but for now this is the end goal achieved. I will review the boundaries too.
nevw (2024-01-11 07:12:24+00:00): Great to hear, this is the new Goat Farm Mountain Bike Park area 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1238433895#map=16/-31.9068/116.0561
Patchanka (2024-01-05 09:25:01+00:00): bonjour
merci pour l'ajout du nom en basque pour la médiathèque.
2 remarques :

- il est utile dans ce cas d'indiquer la source du name:eu, par exemple si c'est une source officielle ou une traduction personnelle. Dans ce cas ajouter le tag source:name:eu=proper translation (si c'est une traduction perso).
Plus d'infos ici sur la page du wiki concernant la langue bretonne : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:name:br

- autre chose lors de vos modifications, vous avez modifié par inadvertance un point du bord de l'Adour qui est parti vers le grand Bayonne. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=145910244
Comme c'était très visiblement une erreur je me suis permise d'annuler cette modification (juste cette partie) car cela commençait à se voir sur le rendu (l'Adour n'apparaissait plus en bleu à cause de ce problème de géométrie). Attention au moment d'enregistrer si ID met une alerte, à bien vérifier ce genre de chose.

bonne journée
eueeeeueee (2024-01-05 08:28:33+00:00): how to cancel this change?
eueeeeueee (2024-01-05 08:39:15+00:00): accidently delete nearby guesthouse which I didnt mean to
eueeeeueee (2024-01-05 09:16:07+00:00): whatever just drop this ticket
mapko (2025-08-14 21:25:56+00:00): Zdravim. Tato cesta https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/206971028#map=16/48.78438/21.19018 krizuje betonovy plot zoo
*Martin* (2025-08-15 07:14:41+00:00): Vdaka za info. Trochu som to upravil, ale bude nutny prieskum na mieste.
mapko (2025-08-15 08:27:36+00:00): Mal som tu cest hladat tu "skratku" no okrem zataraseneho plotu tam nic nie je.
*Martin* (2025-08-15 10:30:51+00:00): ani cesta? ani diera v plote? ;-)
kludne to prosim oprav podla reality. dakujem👋.
mapko (2025-08-15 12:02:43+00:00): diera v betonovom plote je vyplnena. sice o 5-10min. dalej je nova diera v betonovom plote, no neviem ci je len docasna.
StC (2024-01-06 13:43:57+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changeset a créé une interruption dans plusieurs itinéraires cyclistes (EV6 et Loire à Vélo 4 en particulier). Est-ce volontaire ?
titi37 (2024-01-06 14:57:33+00:00): Ce n’est pas volontaire mais le chemin a été détruit par la municipalité
StC (2024-01-06 15:41:00+00:00): Du coup je m'y perds : ce changeset a détruit un pont, enlevé l'appartenance de chemins à des itinéraires, modifié le contour de la rivière, créé des chemins... mais détruit aucun chemin. Quelle est la nature exacte des travaux faits par la municipalité ?
titi37 (2024-01-06 16:55:56+00:00): Bonjour,
Ils ont cassé le chemin piéton au BRH pour y mettre du gazon à la place jusqu’à la rivière. Les vélos doivent désormais contourner.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-31 17:11:00+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11306596563/history has shop = textiles that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
shop=textiles ? Is https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=fabric describing this shop well? Is it intentional that shop=textiles, was used not shop=fabric? How it differs from it?
AndersAndersson (2024-01-05 13:40:49+00:00): Hello
Good to see you are updating the skiing areas!
Please be a little more specific in your changeset comments.
I will remove the (4p) from the name of the chair lift since that is only a description of the aerialway:occupancy.
SpinOff (2024-01-11 21:18:19+00:00): Hej. Na pewno natural=cliff to najlepszy sposób tagowania wąwozów?

Nie wiem czy to bardziej nie pasuje: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:natural%3Dearth_bank
Eye1024 (2024-01-12 13:59:57+00:00): Tag natural=earth_bank (+ earth_bank=gully) bardziej pasuje do wąwozów niż cliff, ale nie renderuje się w OSM Carto.
Staram się unikać tagowania pod render, ale uznałem że widoczność wąwozów na mapie była ważniejsza niż precyzyjne tagowanie. Zwłaszcza że w okolicach Kazimierza Dolnego (voltairovicz) i Nałęczowa (kubahahaha) wąwozy były już oznaczane jako natural=cliff. 
Tag można zmienić hurtem w parę minut - jak tylko twórcy stylu Carto zdecydują się na render natural=earth_bank.
SpinOff (2024-01-12 19:28:22+00:00): Jest to jakiś argument. Nawet jest już dyskusja na ten temat, tylko średnio się posuwa do przodu.
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/2288
mcliquid (2024-01-05 10:01:35+00:00): Hallo, warum hast du den Wegweiser vom Gemeindeamt zu Sparkasse verschoben? Der steht eigentlich wirklich am Gemeindeamt.

Änderungshistorie: https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/node/10570868438
OSM_1975 (2024-01-05 10:11:33+00:00): Vielen Dank für den Hinweis und die Tipps für die Wegeerstellung! Habe den Wegweiser zurückgeschoben (war keine Absicht).
gscholz (2024-01-06 08:04:52+00:00): Hi Potatsteel,
this changeset has created self intersecting lines and duplicate/overlapping buildings:


https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=32.60133&lat=-3.79627&zoom=18&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=145912266

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Manuele R (2024-01-05 09:19:28+00:00): Könntest du bitte nicht alle "meine" Buslinien kaputt machen? Es steht nirgends, dass die Kreisel nicht aufgebrochen werden dürfen, hingegen dürfen mit PTv2 nur wirklich befahrene Abschnitte zur Linie gehören.

Danke und en Gruess aus der Schweiz
gscholz (2024-01-05 10:14:15+00:00): Ich habe die Buslinien repariert und nicht kaputt genacht. Zudem habe ich die überlappenden Segmente an den Kreisverkehren entfernt. Es gibt keine Vorgabe, Kreisverkehre zu zersplitternund schon gar nicht, mehrere Segmente zu verdoppeln und diese übereinander zu legen.

Siehe hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:route

Beste Grüße
Guido
Manuele R (2024-01-05 10:22:25+00:00): Ich weiss nicht wo du überlappende Segmente siehst (vielleicht ein Problem bei JOSM?). 
Der Kreisel ist in meiner Version aus mehrere Segmente (aber nicht doppelte oder überlappende Segmente) anstatt 1 Segment gebildet. Wie jede andere Strasse auch :-)
wkdgs (2024-01-15 16:34:23+00:00): Hi,

du hast aus Versehen das gesamte Gebäude gelöscht und nicht nur die Firma. Das habe ich eben schnell behoben.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145912523
Frans S (2024-01-08 10:02:54+00:00): Hello. I want to repeat my comments on your mappings.
Each building needs  to be squared !
The default tagging of buildings is building=yes


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145913355
__IvanSSSS__ (2024-01-17 07:52:23+00:00): Добрый день! Почему Вы на месте озера Домаши нарисовали заболоченный лес? Там обычное озеро и рыбное хозяйство рядом
Victor Kareno (2024-01-17 08:22:53+00:00): Приветствую.
Я ориентировался на спутниковые снимки, на которых водоема как такового не видно. Ну и озеро, в моем понимании, это природный водоем. А тут судя по всему искусственный, так как есть дамба.
Согласен, что с типом объекта ошибся. Правильнее было бы указать,  что тут заболоченное или полузатопленное место
Victor Kareno (2024-01-17 08:30:43+00:00): И ещё, я посмотрел на советские карты. На этом месте не было озера. Была указана заболоченная местность
mcliquid (2024-01-05 10:05:15+00:00): Hallo, zwei kleine Tipps:
1. Bei einem highway=footway wird foot=yes impliziert, dass muss nicht extra ergänzt werden
2. access=no ist bei dem Konstrukt dann unnötig, da über highway=footway ohnehin nur Fußgänger dürfen und sonst nichts.