piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2025-05-08 20:36:18+00:00): Dit absoluut onjuist.
Een  wegklasse verandert niet zomaar naar residential .
gr eggie
eggie (2025-05-08 20:37:09+00:00): Je edits
eggie (2025-05-08 20:37:14+00:00): https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=165958144
jeslop (2025-05-08 09:01:10+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165972201
eggie (2025-05-08 20:34:50+00:00): Beste   Dit hoort ook niet op de kaart.
amenity
  	events_venue


  name
  	Navo top

Tijdelijke zaken komen niet in OSM
MVG
eggie
jeslop (2025-05-08 09:01:11+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165972201
fortera_au (2025-05-08 03:16:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 165963605 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: fictional game editing
jeslop (2025-05-08 09:01:12+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165972201
felipeeugenio (2025-05-08 03:12:16+00:00): Hola. A que se debe todo lo que borró? 
Fue repuesto ya. Por favor cuidado con sus ediciones
Saludos
jeslop (2025-05-08 09:20:11+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165973048
fortera_au (2025-05-08 03:16:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 165963605 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: fictional game editing
bxl-forever (2025-05-07 22:32:02+00:00): Hello,

If you want to edit locations in two different countries, please upload them as separate changesets.

Never upload them at the same time. Doing so creates a gigantic bounding box covering most of Europe.  Nobody likes that.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Also, please make sure to provide an adequate description of what you changed on the map. Not just the name of a city.

For instance, something like this (which is what this changeset contains)

"Add a playground in Pemberton Gardens, London"

"Add 2 table tennis tables in Whittington Park"

"Remove an industrial area in Pakrac"

"Add some new buildings in Pakrac"
spalinger (2025-05-08 22:17:44+00:00): You just removed 1955 (48 %) of the 3793 addresses in Einsiedeln. Could you please re-add the missing addresses?
Taktaal (2025-05-09 10:10:12+00:00): It is your responsibility as someone who makes an automatic data import to ensure that it is nondestructive. It especially needs to ensure it does not destroy any data that has been manually added by a human editor, and does not blindly duplicate data.

A 52% error rate as in this case is not acceptable for an automated report. I do realize and accept that the other 48% were at least partially positive edits and added to the map. Others of your (unapproved) imports that had an error rate below 10% were left alone by me, I have only reverted those that destroyed a significant amount of human-made edits.
jeslop (2025-05-08 09:20:12+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165973048
Allroads (2025-05-07 23:20:41+00:00): Het heet hier geen Kettingplein, dit heeft geen naam.

Het Kettingplein Openbare Ruimtenaam ligt hier.
https://app.pdok.nl/viewer/#x=180060.51&y=524963.93&z=16.0000&background=Luchtfoto&layers=2891cc29-0a79-46d1-8649-287046d621c7;standaardvisualisatie;_;1

Dat openbaar toilet heeft dan wel een adres, maar dat is van dat plein.  Ongelukkig gegeven. Er is ook alleen maar nummer 1 uitgegeven.  De dierenwinkel die daar zit bij de WC heeft als adres Lange Nering.

Ik ken geen data die parkeerplaats Kettingplein noemt.

De markt is daar en daar worden evenementenvergunningen uitgegeven.

Niet voor de heringerichte parkeerplaats.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11881716077 Kettingplein node.
HirschKauz (2025-05-08 11:28:00+00:00): Hi
please use a single note for each address! and don't use addr1 addr2 etc 
would you kindly correct this?
Regards
EDtheWARDen (2025-05-09 13:11:03+00:00): Yes, I can fix it. 

You mean to use single nodes for the extra addresses?
EDtheWARDen (2025-05-09 13:23:55+00:00): I have reverted the nodes in 166028135 and removed addr* in 166028210
HirschKauz (2025-05-09 15:44:57+00:00): yes indeed - like here for example: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/23OD 
;-)
EDtheWARDen (2025-05-09 16:58:58+00:00): I see. The situation with this building is that it has 7 addresses in the national registry and only 1 of them is used. That is why I thought it would clean it up. 
Anyhow it is fine for me. Thanks for the example.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-05 23:59:05+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12818107221/history has bicycle:repair = yes that was added in this edit
service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with changing this tagging to a more popular version?

I think that in this case difference in key names are minimal, and benefit from easier use of data would be greater

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bicycle:repair and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:service:bicycle:repair
spalinger (2025-05-08 22:30:05+00:00): You just removed 646 (54 %) of the 1191 addresses in Eglisau. Could you please re-add the missing addresses?
Taktaal (2025-05-09 10:09:14+00:00): It is your responsibility as someone who makes an automatic data import to ensure that it is nondestructive. It especially needs to ensure it does not destroy any data that has been manually added by a human editor, and does not blindly duplicate data.

A 46% error rate as in this case is not acceptable for an automated report. I do realize and accept that the other 54% were at least partially. Others of your (unapproved) imports that had an error rate below 10% were left alone by me, I have only reverted those that destroyed a significant amount of human-made edits.
fortera_au (2025-05-08 03:16:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 165963605 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: fictional game editing
spalinger (2025-05-08 06:16:15+00:00): Hi, thanks for your message and for taking the time to review the address imports.

I’d like to clarify that before performing these edits, I announced the address import on the forum and also documented the process in a dedicated wiki post. The goal was to improve address coverage.

Your revert has now removed a large number of addresses from 11 changesets, which were added as part of this effort. I’m concerned that this action may have unintentionally undone valuable work and reduced the quality of the address data.

Could you please clarify what specific issues you found with the imported data? If there were problems with the process or the data quality, I’m more than willing to discuss and help resolve them. I believe it would be best for us to coordinate on the forum or the wiki to ensure we’re aligned and to prevent any further loss of data.

Looking forward to your feedback so we can find a constructive way forward. Thank you!
Taktaal (2025-05-08 06:39:45+00:00): I have specifically reverted only the changes that destroyed significantly more data than they added. Other changesets that added a lot of address nodes but only deleted few addresses on buildings I've left alone.

On this specific changeset you deleted 265 building addresses to add 584 nodes. But after a cursory review of those nodes, at least 30% of them seemed to be very low quality and badly positioned so the value was not there.
spalinger (2025-05-08 22:00:04+00:00): All the address nodes I added were placed at the entrances of each building.

Based on your calculation, it appears that 54% of all addresses in this municipality (a total of 319) were removed. Would it be possible for you to restore or re-add the addresses that were deleted?
spalinger (2025-05-08 22:22:33+00:00): You just removed 665 (73 %) of the 911 addresses in Niederglatt. Could you please re-add the missing addresses?
Taktaal (2025-05-09 10:10:41+00:00): It is your responsibility as someone who makes an automatic data import to ensure that it is nondestructive. It especially needs to ensure it does not destroy any data that has been manually added by a human editor, and does not blindly duplicate data.

A 27% error rate as in this case is not acceptable for an automated report. I do realize and accept that the other 73% were at least partially positive edits and added to the map. Others of your (unapproved) imports that had an error rate below 10% were left alone by me, I have only reverted those that destroyed a significant amount of human-made edits.
jeslop (2025-05-08 09:20:13+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165973048
fortera_au (2025-05-08 03:16:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 165963605 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: fictional game editing
spalinger (2025-05-08 22:26:15+00:00): You just removed 468 (70 %) of the 670 addresses in Stadel. Could you please re-add the missing addresses?
Taktaal (2025-05-09 10:11:08+00:00): It is your responsibility as someone who makes an automatic data import to ensure that it is nondestructive. It especially needs to ensure it does not destroy any data that has been manually added by a human editor, and does not blindly duplicate data.

A 30% error rate as in this case is not acceptable for an automated report. I do realize and accept that the other 70% were at least partially positive edits and added to the map. Others of your (unapproved) imports that had an error rate below 10% were left alone by me, I have only reverted those that destroyed a significant amount of human-made edits.
fortera_au (2025-05-08 03:16:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 165963605 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: fictional game editing
NorthCrab_upload (2025-05-07 22:41:44+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, zamień addr:place na addr:city. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/174718348

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Lezurex (2025-05-08 06:32:22+00:00): Thanks. It actually was discussed **after** importing, and it seems like we decided on reverting these: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/wiki-swiss-gwr-address-data-import-guide/121764
Taktaal (2025-05-08 06:42:08+00:00): Yeah this one was a particularly bad import that destroyed. I think not all of his imports have to be reverted (even though all of them should've been discussed at first, some actually add a lot of addresses where there were none at first). But the imports in places that deleted almost as many addresses as they've added should definitely go.
spalinger (2025-05-08 22:48:25+00:00): I admit that my initial edits were not ideal, especially the mistake in Hirzel. If you remove any addresses, please re-add them where appropriate. Please do not add addresses to lakes or cemeteries. Thank you for helping to improve OSM!

The import was discussed, including at three OSM meetups. Most of the imports took place after these discussions.
Taktaal (2025-05-09 10:12:03+00:00): Can you send me a link to the approvals discussion that you made before the imports?
user_5359 (2025-05-08 12:44:21+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/12818183461. what is the reason of a second phone number in a key (!)?
AjBelnuovo (2025-05-08 13:49:47+00:00): Erro meu. Corrigi.
Obrigado pelo aviso.
fortera_au (2025-05-08 03:16:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 165963605 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: fictional game editing
fortera_au (2025-05-08 03:16:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 165963605 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: fictional game editing
MxxCon (2025-05-10 01:34:31+00:00): Hello.
Are you sure this is 30' wide? It seems to be 2-2.5cars wide, so would be ~20'
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165959951
frostcrackle (2025-05-10 16:09:49+00:00): Hello,

Redid the measurement with StreetMeasure two more times. It's reporting 29'4" and 29'1" respectively, which should round to 30'.
frostcrackle (2025-05-10 16:10:39+00:00): To add,

2 cars can be parked on either side, and you can drive in between them, so it's about 3 cars wide.
MxxCon (2025-05-10 16:36:59+00:00): Are we talking about the same road segment here?🤨
It's way 208824127, diagonal, 1-way segment of Sheepshead Bay Road, connecting Ave Z and E14th. There's 1 lane of parked cars on the right, and 1 lane of moving traffic. I don't see how you can fit 3 cars there.
Here's also a photo of what I see from the satellite imagery https://imgur.com/a/IaR6uFW
frostcrackle (2025-05-10 16:58:51+00:00): Yep, sorry, you're right. I deserve to go on r/confidentlyincorrect at this point. I was measuring the way right next to Tete A Tete. The road widens there.
jeslop (2025-05-08 09:20:14+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165973048
MxxCon (2025-05-10 01:36:05+00:00): Hello.
Please note, when adding street names of features, they should be fully spelled out, not abbreviated. You can read more about this at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Abbreviations
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165960077
pietz (2025-05-10 20:35:04+00:00): Uups. Sorry. Actually I should know that :-/
fortera_au (2025-05-08 03:16:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 165963605 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: fictional game editing
jeslop (2025-05-08 09:20:15+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165973048
fortera_au (2025-05-08 03:15:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 165963605 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: fictional game editing
jeslop (2025-05-08 09:20:16+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165973048
jeslop (2025-05-08 09:27:20+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165973313
fortera_au (2025-05-08 03:15:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 165963605 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: fictional game editing
jeslop (2025-05-08 09:27:21+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165973313
jeslop (2025-05-08 09:27:22+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165973313
jeslop (2025-05-08 09:27:23+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165973313
Soshal Distan Singh (2025-05-07 23:37:07+00:00): Дублировать адреса на магазинах и прочих точках интереса внутри зданий с уже проставленным адресом необходимости нет, просто не заполняйте это поле.
jeslop (2025-05-08 09:27:24+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165973313
m4c (2025-05-07 23:55:47+00:00): Duplikat!
jeslop (2025-05-08 09:27:25+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165973313
AngocA (2025-06-05 22:47:36+00:00): Hola Jesús.

Gracias por contribuir en OSM, y recuerda que cuando se mapean ríos, estos se deben conectar con otros ríos o quebradas.
Frank Peng (2026-01-03 07:55:47+00:00): Please don't delete existing roads on OSM and redraw them anew. Please just modify the existing roads by adjusting their geometry or changing their tags. It is against OSM good practices to delete existing map elments and redraw them anew. Please help preserve the history on OSM by modifying existing map elements instead of deleting them and redrawing them from scratch: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history

For the service roads you deleted in this changeset, you could've just split the service roads and retag one section of them as highway=service + service=parking_aisle (To split a way in the iD editor, click on the way, right-click on one of the nodes of the way where you would like to split the way, click on the scissors icon (the Split option), and it splits the way. You can also split a way by clicking on one of the nodes on the way and then pressing X on your keyboard to split the way).

You can visit this FacilMap link of this changeset to see which roads you deleted: https://facilmap.org/#q=changeset%20165961267

In the future, please make sure to comply with OSM good practice. A map works best when participants agree on a code of conduct. The "Good Practices" are guidelines that will increase the quality and value of the map data without any additional effort. I highly encourage you to read the OSM Wiki article on Good practice before you continue mapping on OSM: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice
gurglypipe (2025-05-08 08:37:22+00:00): Hiya, if you’re going to add lots of new buildings to places in the UK, please make sure to align the aerial imagery to the OSMUK Cadastral Parcels before you start editing. The imagery offset is around -4.13, -0.29m here, so you’re adding the buildings 4m in the wrong place. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Align_aerial_imagery_before_tracing

Thanks
Jacksonville (2025-05-19 01:39:25+00:00): Hi, the Jammu road links Sialkot and Jammu and several towns. Shouldn't this be a primary road?
Ezra Edwards (2025-05-20 20:36:20+00:00): Hello, The road classifications in you changesets needs to be addressed, can you please review your roads classifications ? thanks
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165961492
Jacksonville (2025-05-21 22:38:17+00:00): Hi Ezra, is this to me or RLakhani?
LordGarySugar (2025-05-22 17:49:18+00:00): Hi, just a note to say you might want to review some of your edits to terraced houses here, where you have drawn individual houses on top of existing buildings, you have not deleted the original terrace resulting in overlapping buildings for example with https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1137740940
Kovoschiz (2025-05-08 11:06:12+00:00): Don't upload test edits to a live public non-test database. This is considered vandalism.
wombatmaper (2025-05-08 00:45:05+00:00): Ah shoot, wanted to limit this change to a cluster of mistaken tags around manchester, but I seem to have made a mistake with the bounding box and affected more then expected.
wombatmaper (2025-05-08 00:45:51+00:00): Very sorry, happy to revert if it is desired
Lumikeiju (2025-05-11 00:27:18+00:00): I think `utility=electric` is probably close enough of an unneeded duplicate / typo to warrant a simple global fixup edit like this, so I see no need to revert it.
gwire (2025-05-08 00:55:54+00:00): accidentally committed
Frank Peng (2026-01-03 08:06:12+00:00): Can you explain why you deleted a valid parking area in this changeset? I can personally verify that the parking area still exists here. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1108010434
Frank Peng (2026-01-03 08:08:05+00:00): You can see the FacilMap link of this changeset and you'll see that you deleted a valid parking area that I can verify still exists here: https://facilmap.org/#q=changeset%20165961724
Frank Peng (2026-01-06 08:36:45+00:00): Changeset partially reverted because it inexplicably deleted a parking area that I can personally verify still exists.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176892150
Frank Peng (2026-01-13 08:21:36+00:00): Please also note that deleted map data is harder to find or restore than adjusting added map data. So please be mindful when removing map data. Per the OSM Wiki article on good practice, it states that:
"Be mindful when you remove data because finding or restoring removed data is harder than adjusting added data."
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Do_correct_errors
user_5359 (2025-05-08 09:10:50+00:00): Hello (again)! Please use source instead of sorce. I correct the error!
rempshaener (2025-05-08 16:53:07+00:00): Hallo,

du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Ich habe nur eine Anmerkung zu den Öffnungszeiten. Derzeit steht dort
Mo-Sa 06:30-20:00; PH closed
Es fehlt dann der Sonntag und statt „closed“ wird „off“ verwendet. Das hieße dann
Mo-Sa 06:30-20:00; Su,PH off

Viele Grüße
fortera_au (2025-05-08 03:16:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 165963605 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: fictional game editing
fortera_au (2025-05-08 03:16:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 165963605 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: fictional game editing
fortera_au (2025-05-08 03:16:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 165963605 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: fictional game editing
fortera_au (2025-05-08 03:16:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 165963605 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: fictional game editing
fortera_au (2025-05-08 03:15:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 165963605 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: fictional game editing
NeisBot (2025-05-17 15:10:20+00:00): Hi ImakeFSMAPSNOW, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 9 highway(s)
- 1 building(s)
- 17 natural(s)
- 1 waterway(s)
- 13 landuse(')

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=165962393
NeisReview (2025-05-17 15:14:11+00:00): Thx for (already) reverting.
fortera_au (2025-05-08 03:16:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 165963605 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: fictional game editing
NeisBot (2025-05-17 15:10:20+00:00): Hi ImakeFSMAPSNOW, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 99% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 13 highway(s)
- 5 building(s)
- 6 natural(s)
- 13 landuse(')

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=165962410
NeisReview (2025-05-17 15:14:50+00:00): Thx for (already) reverting.
fortera_au (2025-05-08 03:16:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 165963605 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: fictional game editing
NeisBot (2025-05-17 15:10:20+00:00): Hi ImakeFSMAPSNOW, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 1 highway(s)
- 4 building(s)
- 2 natural(s)
- 21 landuse(')

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=165962439
NeisReview (2025-05-17 15:16:51+00:00): Thx for (already) reverting.
fortera_au (2025-05-08 03:16:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 165963605 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: fictional game editing
NeisBot (2025-05-17 15:10:19+00:00): Hi ImakeFSMAPSNOW, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 1 highway(s)
- 5 building(s)
- 1 natural(s)
- 1 waterway(s)
- 14 landuse(')

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=165962472