piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
GerdP (2025-01-16 07:20:11+00:00): Hi!
Du hast hier aus einigen landuse=residential ein place=village gemacht:  https://www.osm.org/way/48965235
https://www.osm.org/way/229585204
Normalerweise verwendet man das Tag, um einem Ort einen Namen zu geben. Die Landnutzung selbst sollte aber trotzdem erfasst werden. 
Was war der Grund für die Änderung?
Frans S (2024-05-22 11:39:28+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151632787
Frans S (2024-05-22 11:44:48+00:00): Hello. See my comment on another changeset.
Here you collected 2 buildings and mapped them rather poorly. Please be more accurate.
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151632833
Frans S (2024-05-22 12:37:49+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Sorry to say, Very poor mapped.
Clustered buildings. Including whole plots.
Mappings not tagged.


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151632875
gscholz (2024-05-23 05:12:29+00:00): Hi ANNE JUDITH AMA,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-4.01316&lat=5.48703&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=151632915

Especially way 856695201 is affected here:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/856695201

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2024-05-25 06:22:24+00:00): Hi ANNE JUDITH AMA, 
this error still exits, can I get your feedback hare?
Guido
Frans S (2024-06-10 12:44:34+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please don't add tags as a name to a building.
Best regards
Frans S (2024-05-22 11:52:06+00:00): Hello. See my comments on another changeset.
Here you clustered a few times buildings.
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151632950
Frans S (2024-05-22 11:37:27+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. However, 1 case you mapped a courtyard as a building.
Please map a central courtyard in a building as well. See par. 11 on attached document.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151632964
Frans S (2024-05-22 11:41:06+00:00): Hello. This mapping is wrong. You mapped a whole place as a building. In fact, it are 2 small buildings and a yard.
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151632966
Frans S (2024-05-22 10:12:22+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Inaccurate mapped.
Buildings not squared.
Clustered buildings to 1 building
Central courtyards not mapped.

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151632977
mcliquid (2024-05-21 15:56:34+00:00): Deleted duplicated way here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151635766
Frans S (2024-05-22 10:50:26+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 
However, you did not map a central courtyard within a building. (see par. 11 on attached doc.
In 1 case,  you included a part of an adjacent building.
Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151632999
Frans S (2024-05-22 10:42:38+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info).

Clustered buildings.

Oversized mappings.

Not accurate mapped.

Rectangular bukdings not squared,

Yard included.

Central courtyards not mapped.

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151633018
Frans S (2024-05-22 11:59:01+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Rather inaccurate mapped. Not following the rooflines.

Buildings not squared.

Buildings connected with their nodes.

Round storage tank mapped far oversized.

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151633066
Frans S (2024-05-22 12:16:22+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Inaccurate mapped.

Included a shadow.

Sometimes a whole plot mapped as 1 building,

Buildings connected with their nodes.


Explanation can be found in this document what might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151633103
Frans S (2024-05-22 12:01:19+00:00): Hello. See my comment on another changeset.
Here you map an entire perseel as 1 building.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151633164
ManuelB701 (2024-05-22 05:23:11+00:00): Hast du tatsächlich die existierende Relation gelöscht und durch eine neue (eine mit weniger und ggf. fehlerhafte Daten) ersetzt?

Zusammen mit den anderen, kaum qualitativen Änderungen überlege ich so langsam, die DWG zu rufen...
mentz_hde (2024-05-22 06:21:14+00:00): Entschuldige ist mir eine Fehler unterlaufen. Werde ich wieder verbessern.
Frans S (2024-05-22 11:50:14+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Inaccurate mapped. 
Buildings not squared.
Central courtyard not mapped. (see par 11 on attached document)


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151633198
Frans S (2024-05-22 10:45:19+00:00): Hello. I reviewed all your changesets on this project.
See my extended comment on another changeset.
The issues are similar.
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151633291
Frans S (2024-05-22 10:37:25+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. However, rectangular building not squared.
Central courtyards not mapped.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151633311
Frans S (2024-05-22 09:23:56+00:00): Hello. Accurate mapped. However, try to map a central courtyard as well. Look here how to map those.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon#iD
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151633317
Dodko (2024-05-22 08:35:05+00:00): defibrillator:location=slovensko je nesprávne
tam má byť textový popis kde sa nachádza napríklad pri vstupe na vrátnici
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:emergency=defibrillator
Frans S (2024-05-22 09:59:45+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Buildings not squared.
Buildings with yards etc not accurate mapped.
Sometimes the shadow included.

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151633368
mcliquid (2024-05-21 15:52:55+00:00): Hallo und danke für deine Änderungen. Ich habe die Grillstelle wiederhergestellt und access=private ergänzt. Warum? Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Nakaner/Positionspapier_Geheimhaltung#Warum_werden_diese_Objekte_erfasst?_Warum_werden_sie_nicht_gel%C3%B6scht?

Danke :)
M_Gaugg (2024-05-22 16:35:33+00:00): Dein Tag "landuse Osötz-Kapelle" ist ein Fehler, mit Landuse taggt man nur die Landschaft und außerdem heisst die Kapelle Absetzkapelle.
Bienson (2024-05-21 19:18:35+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151644199 - you should know better with 3700 edits.
miluethi (2024-05-21 21:07:20+00:00): Hi Kevin,

I corrected many of your buildings and deleted a few.

Some advice:
1) Square out all buildings by selecting a building shape and press "Q"
2) Don't connect building shapes to highways.

Thank you for contributing to OSM Nicaragua.
Frans S (2024-05-22 09:29:25+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. However:
At 1 building you included tha adjacent yard into a mapping.
Map higher buildings just over the roof and move it to the footprint.  Mostly you see both the siding and the roof of higher buildings.
Map a courtyard in the middle of a building as well.
Look here how it works.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon#iD


Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151634381
Frans S (2024-05-22 09:35:07+00:00): Hi. Another example how to map buildings with a included courtyard or open area.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon#iD
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151634381
srbrook (2024-05-21 18:07:07+00:00): The best way to note this, is change the tag to:
disused:amenity=fire_station
silversurfer83 (2024-05-21 16:24:54+00:00): Hi :)

Du wurdest schon mindestens einmal auf den Artikel https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments hingewiesen. Leider hat sich an deinen Kommentaren nichts geändert. Das ist sehr schade. Vor längerer Zeit, als du noch anders hießt, hast du zumindest mal auf Kommentare geantwortet. Wenn ich diese Liste hier https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=8356149 sehe, wäre es schön, wenn du das mal wieder tun könntest.

Außerdem ziehst du die Punkte, ab denen eine Abbiegespur als eigene Linie läuft recht weit von der Stelle weg, wo die Bauliche Trennung anfängt. Auch auf den Umstand, dass wir idR nur dort eigene ways für eine Lane (oder mehrere) nutzen, wo auch eine bauliche Trennung vorliegt, wurde dir schon mindestens einmal mitgeteilt. Lass doch die Abzweige dort, wo sie sind. So lange da entsprechend die Lanes auf dem way erfasst sind kommen Navis super damit klar und zeigen das auch alles sauber an.

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151634944
xrefz (2024-05-21 17:08:56+00:00): Hallo silversurfer83
Ich versuche mich zu Verbessern.
Habe nun die Ausfahrten etwas gekürzt.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151638923
silversurfer83 (2024-05-21 17:17:11+00:00): Danke für die schnelle Reaktion

Weiter viel viel Spaß an der Karte
halloschorle (2024-05-23 14:25:10+00:00): Hast du absichtlich eine so große Fläche mit einmal bearbeitet, d.h. ein so großes Changeset?
blauloke (2024-05-23 17:44:37+00:00): Da habe ich in der Nordostecke in meiner Gegend Wege und Landflächen eingetragen und in der Südwestecke einen nicht mehr bestehenden Shelter gelöscht. Dabei habe ich nicht an die Größe des Changset gedacht, passiert mir immer wieder mal.
Ich bin Moderator einer Schutzhüttenkarte: https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/de/map/ods-schutzhuttenverzeichnis_568676#7/49.192/13.001
und bekomme Hinweise auf bestehnde oder abgerissene Schutzhütten. 
Du darfst dich gerne daran beteiligen. :)
Frans S (2024-08-06 10:53:33+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
A: Inaccurate mapping.
D: Connecting Nodes to other features.
E: Buildings not squared.



Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151635075
Dodko (2024-05-22 08:36:57+00:00): Považská Bystrica časť Podvažie nemá schválené názvy ulíc.
emersonveenstra (2024-05-21 16:41:37+00:00): Hi there,

Please draw the beach only on the parts of actual beach, not over the body of water
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-31 06:06:54+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/151909464
emersonveenstra (2024-05-21 16:40:03+00:00): Hi there,

Are you sure there's actually a beach there? For clarification, the OSM definition of a beach says that "natural=beach should only be used for inclined, wave formed areas at the coast." (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural=beach?uselang=en#How_to_map) and this doesn't appear to be near a coast
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-05-27 03:07:19+00:00): Reverted
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151636010
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-31 06:11:17+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/151875343
TrickyFoxy (2025-01-02 11:55:10+00:00): странный откат получился: Первая версия https://osm.org/node/11847861886/history создана в https://osm.org/changeset/150505403

По идее точку нужно было удалить. Возможно помешало что она находится в отношении, https://osm.org/relation/17512873/history

которое было создано https://osm.org/changeset/150469515 которое откатывалось в предыдущей вашей правке. Конкретно эти подъезды сейчас подчищу
mavl (2025-01-02 13:54:58+00:00): Спасибо, что исправили.
felipeeugenio (2024-05-21 21:31:24+00:00): Diego, por favor la ortgografía. usamos tildes en OSM. gracias
Đuro Jiří (2024-05-21 20:45:46+00:00): Scrivi commento che modifiche hai effettuato, così anche altri utenti sano che hai fatto. Saluti
Yguiz (2024-05-21 21:38:37+00:00): Ex padiglione geriatria demolito. 
Area di cantiere per costruzione nuovo padiglione day center 2. 
Viabilità modificata per chiusura area di cantiere al traffico interno.
Jordi MF (2024-05-21 16:22:45+00:00): La gent potser diu el nom en castellà (Torre la Sal), però oficialment no és eixe nom.
aceman444 (2024-10-06 21:11:41+00:00): building:use=medical? Preco si vymyslate hodnoty? A ked uz je budova oznacena ako nemocnica (neviem ci to je najspravnejsie, ale budiz), a jej pouzitie je rovnake, tak building:use nepotrebuje vobec.
Szymson (2026-05-11 16:31:43+00:00): Dlaczego nagle Nadleśnictwo Choczewo zostało otagowane jako komisariat policji?
Polciu (2026-05-12 10:30:27+00:00): Do budynku Nadleśnictwa wcisnęli komisariat policji.
Teraz poprawiłem tagowanie - na dwa punkty z instytucjami, by nie było dziwnie, bo jest policja i leśnictwo.
joost schouppe (2024-11-20 09:03:38+00:00): You created a loop road around here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/447185254/history#map=15/49.90141/5.20525 with ref T801. What is this meant to represent?
joost schouppe (2024-11-20 10:15:11+00:00): Same question for the ref on this cycleway: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/447185254/history#map=15/49.90262/5.20752
Ardennen8 (2024-11-20 13:36:48+00:00): This is to represent the Route Touristique/Toeristische Route/Touristic Route T801 in this case the T801, they are official & not created by myself.
joost schouppe (2024-11-20 13:55:10+00:00): You mean something like a waymarked walking route as this map shows? https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=12848402&type=relation&map=15.0/49.9189/5.2018
(because you don't map those with just a ref on the ways but with a relation (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:route)
Ardennen8 (2024-11-20 17:00:37+00:00): No, one of the official Belgian numbers system(s): A, B, N, R, & T.
joost schouppe (2024-11-21 09:03:37+00:00): Can you point out some online documentation about this system. And are there any tagging guidelines for those on the wiki?
joost schouppe (2024-11-21 10:50:12+00:00): Ah nevermind, some folks explained on the chat: https://matrix.to/#/!SqvNXrBsvdGHYRyota:matrix.org/$17321799774944RWwAD:matrix.org?via=matrix.org&via=matrix.domainepublic.net&via=kde.org
It's pretty absurd that Belgium has a T class in the national system and then use it completely randomly, but I guess it's not wrong to copy this weirdness into OSM
mikimapbuilder (2024-05-22 07:27:30+00:00): Road wasn't connected to the main road on siuth side, that is the reason why it was modified.
FFATP8BHOO (2024-05-22 16:40:04+00:00): thanx for modified.
apm-wa (2025-02-18 19:04:58+00:00): Karizek etraby is part of the city of Arkadag. Please also see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dadministrative#Country_specific_values_%E2%80%8B%E2%80%8Bof_the_key_admin_level=* for use of the admin_level tag in Turkmenistan.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-05-21 16:50:23+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11922752311

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀