piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
whb (2023-11-06 11:27:00+00:00): Guten Tag,

Danke für das Erfassen der neuen Geschwindigkeitsbeschränkungen.
Der Wareham-Kreisel ist jetzt von Tempo 30 umgeben, selbst aber Tempo 50. Vermutlich gilt hier auch Tempo 30?
Siehe auch diese Karte, welche die aktuell bei OSM erfassten Höchstgeschwindigkeiten anzeigt:
https://openstreetbrowser.org/#map=18/49.59325/8.63751&basemap=osm-mapnik&categories=car_maxspeed

Viele Grüße
whb
osm0915 (2023-11-06 19:43:42+00:00): Guten Tag, 

das ist eine gute Frage. Prinzipiell gilt ja im Kreisverkehr die Geschwindigkeit, die vorher galt, es sei denn, sie wurde aufgehoben. Von Osten und Westen aus gilt vorher 30, daher würde auch im Kreisverkehr 30 gelten. 

Von Norden und Süden kommend steht vor dem Kreisverkehr ein "30 Zone Ende"-Schild - somit würde im Kreisverkehr 50 gelten.

Allerdings ist die Diskussion glaube ich rein akademisch und praktisch gesehen macht es wirklich Sinn, auch den Kreisverkehr mit 30 zu markieren. Es fährt da eh keiner mit 50 durch. Soll ich es ändern?

Viele Grüße
whb (2023-11-07 14:34:23+00:00): Guten Tag,

> Soll ich es ändern?

Ja, ich halte das für sinnvoll.

Viele Grüße
whb
osm0915 (2023-11-07 19:33:03+00:00): Done.

Viele Grüße
wireguy (2023-11-21 14:29:58+00:00): Dave, removed accidently pasted url from a housenumber.  Took a guess that should be housenumber 12, you may want to validate.  see: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11304734280
Dave Venables (2023-11-21 15:44:34+00:00): 12 looks to be correct. The accidental paste was in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143479568 before my changeset but I still should have corrected
Is correct now
Ze0zohk1 (2023-11-04 18:16:11+00:00): Die Löschung der Relation war nicht beabsichtigt. Das habe ich mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143624687 korrigiert.
qugeb (2023-11-06 14:35:24+00:00): If the defi is really removed, then it should be removed here in osm too or at least tagged as removed:amenity..
giubar (2023-11-06 15:23:08+00:00): I agree. The display case is present and in good condition. I don't know if it is temporarily absent for maintenance or has been permanently removed. I used the StreetComplete app, not knowing it was writing an actual key, but I thought it left a note.
Bobbi123 (2023-11-07 08:56:00+00:00): Kannst du bitte solche Änderungen deutlich kleinteiliger machen? Denn so ist es für andere User sehr unübersichtlich.
Strubbl (2023-11-05 17:34:18+00:00): Danke für deine Mithilfe bei meinem Hinweis. Das sieht tatsächlich so aus als ob die Kita mal umgezogen ist.
yellowsoar (2023-12-04 15:16:10+00:00): 這個活動中心是存在的嗎？
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/344723177/history
未出現在南港區公所的區民活動中心列表中
https://ngdo.gov.taipei/cp.aspx?n=9D325B440666911C
Taipei Native (2023-12-05 00:15:18+00:00): 這間是國興街上面社區的活動中心，不是新北市的市民活動中心（另，這邊是汐止不是南港）
Taipei Native (2023-12-05 00:17:34+00:00): 之所以寫「活動中心」是因為門口就寫著「活動中心」四個字嘛。
Supaplex (2023-12-06 05:54:49+00:00): 用 osmcha 看，的確變動都在大坑溪以東，新北市汐止區橫科地區。因此，不會在南港區的清單上有資料
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143618549
yellowsoar (2023-12-18 15:01:36+00:00): 首先，這個「活動中心」的問題不在於到底位於南港區或汐止區，而是活動中心這個 name 在沒有其他 tag 的情況下，有可能讓一般人誤以為這是一個政府維運的公共活動中心。

如果是整個社區的活動中心，當然也不會在官方的活動中心列表上。
https://www.xizhi.ntpc.gov.tw/home.jsp?id=4448a69be9753ff4

為了避免誤會，可以加上 access tag 或是在 description tag 上加註。
flohoff (2023-11-05 07:29:28+00:00): Hi Niels,

i saw this change of Caravan sites and you most likely have used old/misplaces aerials imagery and moved at least one  off by a couple meters overlapping other objects.

For this area of Germany we have centimeter accuracy Aerials so all the globals as ESRI, Bing and Co are all much worse than what we have.

Also you used the "name" tag to put in descriptive text. This should be in the "descriptive" tag not the name tag. 

I corrected that for the Caravan site in Gütersloh at the Welle.

Having a look at the others in this changeset.

Flo
surveyor54 (2023-11-04 22:48:38+00:00): Hi,
bitte keine Flächen mit Grenzlinien verkleben.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1221008755

Gruß
surveyor54
MarcoR (2023-11-07 06:32:31+00:00): Ciao GiovanniBT e benvenuto su OpenStreetMap,

quel cammino che hai disegnato è segnalato da cartelli stradali, bandierine, segnavia o altro?
Oppure non è stato ancora realizzato o è conosciuto solo dalle persone locali?
H4N5-antw (2024-10-19 05:10:55+00:00): Wat een blunder! Je hebt https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1199689019 op fiets=fietspad gezet zonder een verbinding te maken van de Misweg. Laat dat toch na, je vernield op deze manier -door pure onoplettendheid- bruikbare fietsroutes. 
Neem aan dat je deze fout zult herstellen, en de andere 'verbeteringen' even naloopt?
Dank!
JanFi (2024-10-19 08:42:29+00:00): Oeps. Maak ik zelf de fout die ik al letterlijk honderden keren heb moeten verbeteren bij anderen. Dat terwijl ik fietspaden alleen maar apart inteken omdat ik dat soort fouten relatief zelden maak, niet omdat het voor de rest enig nut heeft. Bedankt om de fout te signaleren: ik werk ze onmiddellijk weg.
eggie (2023-11-05 07:55:58+00:00): Hi HV  
'Huizen?"
Please comment your edits properly.
Hint use English in your comments,

Greetz,
eggie
carlbacker (2023-11-06 23:21:50+00:00): Hi Pinpinplss, and welcome to OSM!

It looks like the edits you made here on Utklippan doesn't exist in reality, maybe you accidentally uploaded something you didn't plan to?

Please provide a source to these edits, or if this was a mistake, just revert or correct them. Feel free to let me know if you wan't help!

/ Jacob
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143620695
eggie (2023-11-04 17:49:13+00:00): Je edits ... Lijkt me oke op een kleinigheidje na.. 
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=143620717
De spelling klopt niet van de plaatsnaam.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-11-04 18:33:35+00:00): Gecorrigeerd.. Nu toch de editmodus open.
Glassman (2023-11-05 19:45:03+00:00): #TIP: When removing businesses - leave the address, it will likely be reused.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143621223
jumbanho (2023-11-05 14:36:59+00:00): I was just about to add this cyclepath.  Nice!
Jordan Leick (2023-11-05 17:06:33+00:00): I’ve been waiting a long time for the construction to wrap up! I think a few sidewalk crossings still need to be mapped, but I won’t be able to visit soon to confirm.
SKald (2023-11-15 10:59:00+00:00): Hallo!
Wie schon andernorts diskutiert (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137425772) erfindest du Straßennamen. In (meistens kleinen) Orten mit Konskriptionsnummern haben die Straßen, von wenigen Ausnahmen abgesehen, keine Namen. Haus- resp. Hofzufahrten (highway=service) haben auch gar keine. Auch wenn Dein Editor dich dazu auffordert, ist es für eine saubere Datenbasis kontraproduktiv Namen zu erfinden (oder von der basemap abzuschreiben), wo es keine, nachprüfbaren, ("ground truth") gibt.
Bitte passe Deine Bearbeitungen dahingehend an.

Lg,
Stefan
forstner-m (2023-11-15 12:08:04+00:00): Hallo Stefan,
in diesem Bereich stimmen die Namen. Es gibt auch Güterweg- und Ortschilder bei den Straßen. Daher wurde nichts erfunden. On the ground Prinzip wurde damit erfüllt. Damit sehe ich kein Problem.
Danke!
Schöne Grüße
Michael
SKald (2023-11-15 12:15:20+00:00): Sorry, aber das ist falsch.
ZB Unteredt ganz im Osten des Changesets:
Da gibt es eine Tafel "Güterweg Unteredt", das hab ich auch nicht angezweifelt, aber das die L1517, plötzlich Unteredt heisst schon...
forstner-m (2023-11-15 12:20:55+00:00): Bei Unteredt hast du recht, dass sollte saniert werden. Machst du das oder soll ich?
SKald (2023-11-15 13:23:35+00:00): Mach ich, ich habs eh schon offen.

Eine kleine Bitte noch zum Schluss: Wenns leicht geht, ist es guter Stil die History an einem Objekt zu belassen, damit man leichter nachvollziehen kann, was sich wie entwickelt hat. Mir ist bewusst, dass es manchmal weitaus leichter ist die Daten neu zu machen, aber da geht dann halt auch viel Information unter.

Schau Dir mal jOSM als Editor an (und lass Dich nicht von der komischen Oberfläche abschrecken), der hat viele der Einschränkungen vom id nicht.
forstner-m (2023-11-15 16:51:14+00:00): Eigentlich lösche ich keine Objekte und lege diese wieder an um die History zu löschen. Wo sollte das passiert sein?
JOSM verwende ich manchmal auch. Der ID ist mir aber sympathischer.
SKald (2023-11-15 18:56:49+00:00): Da habe ich mich verschaut (wg. Teilung der Landesstrasse): Sorry!
Fresno map (2023-11-05 03:36:46+00:00): Thank you for correcting this. My mistake!
ti-lo (2023-11-05 13:25:34+00:00): You're welcome, just stumbled on it. Anyway I think there should be a parameter to search for private rocket launch sites, similar to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aweather_control%3Dlaunchpad or https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:military%3Dlaunchpad. But leisure / amenity IMHO doesn't fit. Any idea ?
Fresno map (2023-11-05 16:21:56+00:00): Perhaps Hobby or Amatuer Rocketry Launchpad? That would be the best fit and I am sure that would be a helpful tag to create.
ti-lo (2023-11-05 16:29:48+00:00): Found this one : https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/model_aerodrome%3Aaeroway#overview
Fresno map (2023-11-05 18:37:11+00:00): I think that tag is too ambigous and is meant to refer to a wider variety of hobbys (such as model airplanes/helicopters and drones). The term "aerodrome" is not used in the United States. This site does not have any infrastrucure to speak of when model rockets are not actively being launched.
ti-lo (2023-11-06 21:17:49+00:00): The "wider variety" is what I'd prefer instead of inventing a new expression from scratch. What's the problem with 
model_aerodrome:aeroway=launchpad ? The first part says "not meant for the professional stuff", the second it's about flight (same as for the "big" rockets), the third says which type. There are lots of similar namespaces, it's just that model rockets seem to be a niche up to now. Compare with those values : https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=model_aerodrome. There are 16 032 (big) "aerodromes" in the US (and Canada) https://taginfo.geofabrik.de/north-america:us/tags/aeroway=aerodrome#overview
Fresno map (2023-11-07 18:04:51+00:00): I understand the "aerodrome" tag being applied to airports. I apologize I did not see the full tag was aeroway=launchpad. When I first clicked on you link I just saw model_aerodrome:aeroway without the aeroway=launchpad and I was confused. I think that tag is correct.
ti-lo (2023-11-07 18:38:56+00:00): The status is "de facto" which is quite usual https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dmodel_aerodrome. It was documented 10 years ago, so it's safe to say it's established https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:sport%3Dmodel_aerodrome&action=history. You could probably amend the rocket usage in the wiki to make it clearer for the next affected user (which otherwise needs to search in taginfo as I did)
eggie (2023-11-05 07:48:19+00:00): Hi HV..
Please decrease your edit area.
This way of mapping may harm the map.

Greetz..
eggie
YPGGUUY (2024-08-01 08:04:16+00:00): 羽毛球館 should be leisure=sports_centre and building=yes
YPGGUUY (2024-08-01 08:05:45+00:00): *網球館
Tetryk (2023-11-06 16:27:30+00:00): Automat źle podpowiada. Tag public_transport=platform jest już na punkcie przystanku. Na "peronie" dubluje wartość platform, która już jest w tagu highway. Poprawiłem.
BartekChom (2023-11-06 23:37:22+00:00): Skoro tak twierdzisz. Mogę się zgodzić. Przepraszam.
map per (2023-11-05 07:24:09+00:00): Hallo hearp,

hier hast du deine eingene Bearbeitung mit dem Organic Maps Edit mit Quatsch überschrieben (vgl. https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/2821761160)

Viele Grüße
map per
map per (2023-11-11 08:40:16+00:00): Habs korrigiert

VG
map per
eggie (2023-11-04 18:38:05+00:00): Dag zoljiks

Je kunt niet op grond van de dakvorm de gebouwen aanpassen.
 Dat is niet waar ze staan.
Zou de BAG en de BGT er zo naast zitten? Het zijn schuin genomen luchtfoto's.
Wanneer adressen niet kloppen graag doorgeven aan de BAG (Kadaster)
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/?searchQuery=suikerlaan+1a&objectId=0014200022210167&theme=BRT+Achtergrond&geometry.x=232166.6308517449&geometry.y=581219.4267983461&zoomlevel=14.136

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-11-04 18:41:26+00:00): De gebouwen heb ik teruggeplaatst.
Stel dat het wolkenkrabbers zouden zijn. Zou dan het dak op een foto de werkelijke locatie zijn?
Groet
eggie
eggie (2023-11-04 18:45:33+00:00): Hi Please don't trust an obliquely taken  imagery ... I restored the buildings.
Greetz,
eggie
arjunaraoc (2024-01-07 01:21:10+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).

Check my update: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145976408
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143624424
ceirios (2023-11-04 21:50:41+00:00): Hi there and welcome to OSM :) Thank you for your contributions

You tagged these as amenity=school (School Grounds), which is meant for tagging entire schools overall. Perhaps School Building or just the name tag would be better?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=school

Happy mapping,
Ceirios
didier2020 (2023-11-05 08:09:34+00:00): please stop using Every Door Android 4.0

there is 10 times the same data
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11315126569 

#DWG
luisforte (2023-11-04 20:57:08+00:00): Boas
O segmento que liga uma via de um determinado tipo, primária neste caso, a outra do mesmo tipo, é também uma via primária, não um primary_link, como podes facilmente verificar na wiki.
Luís
luisforte (2023-11-04 21:03:16+00:00): Ignora pf o comentário anterior, não sei porque motivo imaginei a situação inversa!
Luís
orhygine (2023-11-07 13:08:32+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue sur OpenStreetMap ! J'ai vu que vous avez demandé la revue de cette modification et me permet donc d'y jeter un coup d'oeil. Il apparaît que ce type de chemin d'accès à une maison devrait plutôt être caractérisé en tant que hightway=service (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:highway%3Dservice) plutôt que highway=path. path est utilisé pour des chemin de randonnée dans la campagne par exemple.
orhygine (2025-01-25 13:59:55+00:00): J'ai effectué la correction dans le groupe de modification https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161747298.
ovruni (2023-11-05 01:41:56+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambios se han eliminado nodos de instituciones educativas que tienen mas de 10 etiquetas para poner solo un building=kindergarten alrededor, lo cual hace que se pierda el resto de información. Por favor revisa la documentación sobre mantener el historial [0] (sección nodo a área) Además cuando se etiqueta como edificio una vía que contiene parte otro edificio y se selecciona la opción de "etiquetar esto mas alto" (o mas bajo) solamente se esta diciendo que un edificio esta volando por encima del otro, por lo que esa opción solo debe de ir cuando un objeto va encima de otro, como es el caso de un puente sobre un río.
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Mantener_el_historial
Favio Duran (2023-11-05 01:49:45+00:00): Listo, anotado.
aTarom (2023-11-05 08:07:47+00:00): Hola alejandroacmo, gracias por editar, cuando puedas revisa este nodo
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2562258334/history
con el tag
"ref:bic=*"="designation=emblematic_hotel"
Si puedes añade comentarios en los conjuntos de cambio (changeset) y así podemos agilizar las revisiones
Saludos y feliz mapeo
AkshatPal (2023-11-05 10:03:51+00:00): Hey , you need also to mark the line as residential or other road . Otherwise it will not show on the map . And you can map buildings by selecting the area
arjunaraoc (2024-01-08 11:27:21+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).

Check my improvements https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146025009
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143625942
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-01-31 16:03:50+00:00): name=PT Trading Enterprises Ltd.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11315558725

shop=buddhist_supplies ? Would shop=religion religion=buddhist tagging fit well? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dreligion
literan (2023-11-06 10:15:22+00:00): а зачем убрали тег bridge=yes? это мост. Верну.
MarcoR (2023-11-06 16:01:01+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto su OpenStreetMap!

Che cosa è il Lotto progetto? Ha tutta l'aria di essere un qualcosa di non realmente esistente.

Buon mapping,
Marco.
Lori_Bruner (2023-11-04 18:58:52+00:00): HI! I'M LOOKING FOR A PARTNER FOR SEX! WRITE ME https://is.gd/Lori_Bruner
AkshatPal (2023-11-05 09:59:18+00:00): Hi ,welcome to OSM . You do not need to remove a private road , you can just tag it as Private access
arjunaraoc (2024-01-07 00:57:03+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).

Check my update: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145976117
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143626246
NorthCrab_upload (2023-11-04 19:10:29+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/458914386
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1221064344
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1221064345

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
aTarom (2023-11-05 07:56:08+00:00): Hi, thanks for edit, the challenge say "This challenge will show every highway=stop without direction=*. Your goal is to add tag "direction" with value: "forward", "backward" or "both" for every stop."
For example is more precise "direction"="forward" than "direction"="S"
at
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9884071433/history
Cheers
fehlerfinder (2023-11-05 11:04:16+00:00): Hi,
Thanks for your comment! On the other hand, the wiki explicitly describes the option to tag traffic sign directions with cardinal directions (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:direction end of the section "angles and cardinal directions") and warns of the problem that if the direction of a way is reversed, it may happen that the directions of traffic signs are not reversed accordingly, and thus point towards the wrong direction (same wiki page, end of the section Forward and backward). Both situations are also described in the Spanish wiki page. On the other hand, it is clear that direction=forward/backward is easier to interpret for routers. However, I could not find information about routers being able or not able to interpret cardinal directions.
So my understanding was that both versions have advantages and disadvantages, but that both can be used. I did not find any discussion with clear conclusion in the forum either, but if there was any agreement in Catalunya or Spain to use only one of the tagging schemes, I will be happy to follow
DeFra85 (2023-11-24 18:09:31+00:00): Hej, why did you changed the website on the guidepost ?
The website printed on the Location-marker has no http:// nor https:// . It is just printed www.teutoburgerwald.de
b-jazz (2023-11-24 19:11:59+00:00): Phone numbers in my area don’t have an area code or country code, but the correct format is to include both of those. Same idea for website URLs.
Friendly_Ghost (2023-11-05 20:54:03+00:00): Hello. Please write more informative changeset comments, so other mappers can get an idea of what you are editing. Please have a look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Good_changeset_comments for the relevant guideline.
SomeoneElse (2023-11-05 10:42:33+00:00): Hello,
Just wondered - was it deliberate to use "place=county" on this "boundary=historic_county"? Other examples such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15698591 don't have it; another one https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16300459 has place=historic:county.  Currently there are two Waterfords:

>   osm_id   |        name        
> -----------+--------------------
>  -16649259 | County Waterford
>    -283426 | County Waterford
Gonéo (2023-11-05 15:23:11+00:00): Est-ce supprimé temporairement pour les travaux ou définitivement suite à un réaménagement ?
plocimac (2023-11-05 16:14:24+00:00): pour le moment ça a l'air provisoire; je ne sais pas quelle est la politique dans ce cas précis du coup. merci !
Gonéo (2023-11-05 20:59:24+00:00): Si c'est provisoire pour quelques semaines on laisse en place. Je laisse la note ouverte pour vérifier à la fin des travaux.
Xvtn (2023-11-05 17:27:23+00:00): What's your source on removal of these streams? Are you deleting features that don't appear on the old USGS topo maps?
Xvtn (2023-12-14 20:08:41+00:00): Any info on this?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143628306
zstadler (2023-11-05 07:03:50+00:00): Hello 

Thank you for your recent mapping contribution on both sides of the Egypt-Israel border.

In this edit, you have modified the geometry of the administrative boundary 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/725996341

In the future, please modifying administrative boundaries based on aerial imagery or other non-authoritative sources.

Thanks,
Zeev
zstadler (2023-11-05 09:10:34+00:00): Correction:
In the future, please avoid modifying formal boundaries based on aerial imagery or other non-authoritative sources.
lipuma (2023-11-05 11:46:12+00:00): Volgensmij staat er niet dat je niet mag afslaan op de parallelweg (Tweede Bloksweg).

Hoe werken de verkeersregels in een situatie zoals deze?
eggie (2023-11-05 11:56:04+00:00): Wanneer er geen afslagbeperking is dan kunnen die afslagbeperkingen uiteraard weg.
Zijn ze er wel dan is het op te lossen met except=emergency
Ik heb de afslagbeperkingen niet toegevoegd. Wie wel?
gr eggie
eggie (2023-11-05 12:05:37+00:00): Even gespiekt op een recente straatkijk.
Daar zie ik ook geen afslagbeperkingen op de Vredenburghlaan.
Wel een altijd rechtdoor beperking op de Tweede Bloksweg en de IJsermanweg.
De weg is volgens mij niet ingericht om komende vanuit zuidoost Vredenburghlaan naar links af te slaan naar de IJsermanweg.
Ik denk dat ze wat bebording zijn vergeten na de laatste reconstructie. 

Wonderlijk hier.
Formeel mag je dus afslaan met alle kans op problemen met afslaan.

Ik stuur deze link even door naar de VR. Dan hebben ze wat uit te zoeken.
lipuma (2023-11-05 12:34:06+00:00): Oh, ik dacht dat deze restriction (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12711066) inhield dat je vanaf de Vredeburghlaan richting het kruispunt alleen rechtdoor mag en niet eerst naar rechts naar de Tweede Bloksweg.
lipuma (2023-11-05 12:34:17+00:00): Wat is de VR?
eggie (2023-11-05 13:44:10+00:00): Lijkt mij ook...   Maar de brandweer kon daar niet rechtsaf in noodgevallen omdat de afslagbeperking dat verhinderde.  Vandaar de suggestie/aanpassing met except=emergency.
De VR is  Veiligheidsregio 
Daar valt de Brandweer o.a. onder.
Die gebruiken LiveNav en rijden dus op OSM.
Eigenlijk zou die app dus afslagbeperkingen moeten kunnen negeren.
Maar dat is een overleg tusen VR's en LiveNav (LiveOp!)
https://www.liveop.net/

Wij hebben als OSM geen contact (meer) met de appbouwer. De ontwikkeling ligt gevoelig. ... denk aan  concurrentie.
Sven Pothuizen (2023-11-06 06:52:14+00:00): Het klopt, voor zover ik kan zien op straat is er geen afslag verbod weergegeven in de bebording om rechtstreeks de Tweede Bloksweg of IJssermanweg op te gaan vanaf de Vredenburglaan. Ook eventuele belijning is daar niet op ingericht. Echter leent de bocht het voor regulier verkeer niet echt om dit te doen dus ik snap de beperking die erin staat in OSM. 
Ik zal even checken of met de tag het voor ons oplost.