piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2026-03-24 05:24:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 28 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1160620920 v2 | 15 crossings
https://osm.org/way/558189787 v10 | 13 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/10794694678 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180334810
iandees (2026-03-24 12:52:06+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10794694678 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180352822, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
clambake92115 (2026-04-28 18:00:45+00:00): Many of these tagged as tertiary should be service roads. Tertiary is for connecting settlements or minor to major roads. Service roads are used for roads to a specific destination like in this case. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtertiary
Yushclay (2026-04-28 22:28:08+00:00): Sure, I can reconsider some of them.
iandees (2026-03-24 12:54:11+00:00): Hi! It looks like the website URL on node/3959814239 may have been copied from Google Maps (it contained Google tracking parameters). Please be careful not to copy information from Google into OpenStreetMap, as Google's data is copyrighted.
SereneDeluge (2026-05-27 11:20:28+00:00): Hello, I'm reverting some of your changes here as they are incorrect.
In Sweden, access=private should almost never be used in residential areas. Laws are very permissive here.
There are also other tags that are mis-used here such as motor_vehicle=destination, which again not limited by swedish law here, and service=driveway. Many of the roads here are just residential and some are service.
Please check your tag usage for the future, thanks for contributing!
liljaadeliina (2026-05-27 11:34:29+00:00): Hello

Thank you for the feedback and I'm sorry / you're correct I shouldn't have added the access tags without being extra sure.
ieguy3 (2026-03-24 06:09:48+00:00): https://www.cityofperris.org/Home/Components/News/News/212/15
ieguy3 (2026-03-24 06:15:25+00:00): its part of the expressway project
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-24 06:37:28+00:00): @World_Winner Thanks for fixing the mentioned issue and for commenting.

Would it be possible to add a direct link to the changeset instead of only the raw changeset ID? Something like changeset/180336282 would be very helpful.

Thanks!
dzamper (2026-03-24 11:31:47+00:00): Why were 5+ stops removed?
https://osm.virtuelle-loipe.de/history/?type=relation&ref=162958
adamos (2026-03-28 09:59:12+00:00): sorry, fixed
dzamper (2026-03-28 18:38:08+00:00): Thank you :)
dzamper (2026-03-24 11:30:10+00:00): Why were 3 correct stops removed and exit_only moved to the wrong stop? https://osm.virtuelle-loipe.de/history/?type=relation&ref=12400706
adamos (2026-03-28 09:59:03+00:00): sorry, fixed
dzamper (2026-03-28 18:38:10+00:00): Thank you :)
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-24 06:36:50+00:00): @World_Winner Thanks for fixing the mentioned issue and for commenting.

Would it be possible to add a direct link to the changeset instead of only the raw changeset ID? Something like changeset/180336762 would be very helpful.

Thanks!
World_Winner (2026-06-04 15:35:25+00:00): Hi pitscheplatsch,

Thank you for your feedback. As a team, we will make sure to follow the practice of providing URLs in our comments.
Wildsharky (2026-03-25 10:14:38+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:180390709
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:02:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
Fizzie-DWG (2026-05-06 02:39:15+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown Source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182274519
NeisBot (2026-03-24 07:27:48+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13673701828 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Pediatric care office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-01 10:33:04+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180714084
(Delete spam tags. First version)
eggie (2026-03-24 07:48:18+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback Je heb twee parkeerplaatsen verwijderd. Zijn dat geen parkeerplaatsen?
Bedrijven tkun je het beste bijtaggen op de adresnode. Dus niet op de gebouwomtrek. Geef ook de aard van het bedrijf aan. 
Ik pas even wat aan.

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
WojtekNL (2026-03-24 09:31:59+00:00): Goedemorgen,
Inderdaad zijn dit geen parkeerplaatsen; het zijn privé, afgesloten terreinen van garages.
eggie (2026-03-24 09:34:15+00:00): Oke.. duidelijk.
eggie (2026-03-24 07:57:20+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback .. Heeft deze kraam werkelijk huisnummer 401 of sowieso een huisnummer? 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
mvanwijhe (2026-03-24 09:18:25+00:00): Dag Eggie,

Nee eigenlijk niet inderdaad. 
Ik dacht dat het beter was om een huisnummer te kiezen dichtbij. 
Ik zal deze weghalen.
eggie (2026-03-24 09:33:23+00:00): Oke... top!
Ótzï fón GlüϷgor (2026-03-24 17:33:38+00:00): “Memel” is the officially correct name (for the city)
https://www.duden.de/rechtschreibung/Memel_Stadt
Even when typing text (like in Word), “Klaipeda” is flagged as an error (because it’s not a German word!).
Travel agencies often get their information from Google Maps about where Klaipeda is located. However, this is nonsense for German usage. I have a second home between Memel and Königsberg and know many Germans who live there locally; none of them say they are from Klaipeda.
Ótzï fón GlüϷgor (2026-03-24 17:35:25+00:00): (The Duden dictionary sets the standard for spelling in Germany, including common names for cities)
Taya_S (2026-03-24 17:51:39+00:00): Take it to the forum please.
OlasMapy (2026-03-24 20:08:21+00:00): Die Diskussion ist noch da, bitte reden Sie dort.
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:34:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:02:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:08:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:07:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
World_Winner (2026-03-26 04:14:46+00:00): Partially Revert of 180338674
007Transformer (2026-03-25 07:21:02+00:00): Revert of 180335933
A67-A67 (2026-03-24 08:33:46+00:00): This change reverts the alignement of the A9 to the situation before the reconstruction of a few weeks ago. Secondly an intersection has been changed in an incorrect way, that messes up turn lanes. I'll revert this change.
Gorger (2026-03-24 08:54:35+00:00): Hi A67-A67, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you
Gorger (2026-03-28 09:18:38+00:00): Hi A67-A67, 

Thank you for reverting the changeset. Since that was a large area, I was planning to perform the edits in multiple changesets and was also going to address the turn lanes in consecutive edits. Based on TomTom’s GPS traces, there are still potential improvements based on section alignment. Please let me know if you’re OK with me performing those edits.
A67-A67 (2026-03-28 10:03:28+00:00): About the intersection, please note that separate ways should only be mapped, when there is a physical separation. The intersection itself should be drawn as a square or triangle in cases like this, when it's just a large asphalt area. 

Only the right turn from the south to the east has physical separation. Adding this way is more than just adding a line. All correct tags should be added (not just highway=primary_link), turn-lanes should be adjusted. A turn restriction should be added on the main intersection. 

The A9 motorway itself has 5 lanes going to the east, 3 lanes from the A9 and 2 from the Amsterdam junction (4) merge to 5 lanes. So the 5 lanes should be aligned at the middle lane, while more traffic may be on the left lanes. Hence your GPS traces may be off.
Gorger (2026-04-12 06:11:00+00:00): Thank you for the detailed explanation A67-A67
Jakka (2026-03-24 08:40:17+00:00): op deze locatie staat er niets.
Wildsharky (2026-03-25 10:16:04+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:180395207
opendcc (2026-04-04 19:27:00+00:00): Your logic (and tagging) is simply wrong. Logic: shop, hotel are keywords, not values. kindergarten is one possible value of the keyword amenity. Tagging: the entrance tag denotes the type of entrance, not the kind of craft or amenity behind this entrance. Add description or ref to give additional infos.
yelisey90 (2026-04-05 07:16:12+00:00): Once again: as long at the *value* shop is used to denote the type of entrance — and it is used for that purpose both according to the wiki and de-facto, like "office", "hotel" etc. — I totally see no reason why "kindergarten" shouldn't be a similarly used *value*.

As soon as another mechanism of differentiating entrances is introduced *and* established (or at least described in the wiki), I will be totally happy to use that mechanism.
opendcc (2026-04-05 08:46:28+00:00): If everybody feels free to use any self-invented tagging schema, openstreetmap will die in chaos. The regular way: If you want to introduce new tagging values, apply for a consens among the mapper community - ie put a proposal on the list and let vote on this proposal. If you are not willing to work with the community, I will report this to the DWG.
yelisey90 (2026-04-05 16:27:03+00:00): Huh, have all the users who had added 632 instances of entrance=office got reported? Or the users who added 574 instances of entrance=restaurant? 21 instances of entrance=hotel? 23 of toilets? 9 of museum? 7 of clinic?
So what is your personal distaste of entrance=kindergarten that you start intimidating others because of it?
And I'll repeat this one more time: I will be happy to use another scheme, if I see it being used instead of the present one (which, again, was not introduced by me no matter how hard you'd like to accuse me of that).
Rainero (2026-03-28 19:37:47+00:00): Revert changeset/180556433
wegen nicht zulässiger Quelle (Bayernatlas).
Rainero (2026-03-28 19:43:01+00:00): Falscher Kommentar: gültig ist der erste Kommentar; es wurde changeset/176878490 revertiert.
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:11:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
007Transformer (2026-03-25 05:20:20+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id 180386483
Fizzie-DWG (2026-05-09 04:44:44+00:00): DWG revert - poor quality mapping

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182408486
iandees (2026-03-24 12:54:27+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5535921358 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180352935, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
eggie (2026-03-24 09:47:23+00:00): Welkom bij OSM,
Het achterom staat op access=private 
Dat routeert niet. Wellicht delivery=yes toevoegen aan het wegdeel?
MVG
eggie
SANT Interiors (2026-03-24 09:50:49+00:00): Ja graag, gaat alleen om leveranciers.
SANT Interiors (2026-03-24 09:55:25+00:00): Worden leveranciers (van pakketten) hier naar toe gestuurd nu?
eggie (2026-03-24 10:00:45+00:00): Ik heb delivery=yes toegevoegd.
Mits de navigatieapp dat ondersteunt zal zodra de updates in de app zijn doorgevoerd het hier routeren.
Sommige routers negeren access=private en zal het dus routeren.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_car&route=51.907609%2C4.431964%3B51.908556%2C4.433295#map=18/51.907985/4.433372

Bijwerken in apps kan even duren. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-03-24 10:06:29+00:00): Klanten worden hier nu overigens ook hierheen gestuurd.
SANT Interiors (2026-03-24 10:12:16+00:00): Klanten gebruiken vaak google maps, staat dit aan elkaar gekoppeld? Volgens mij is dit apart van google maps toch?
eggie (2026-03-24 10:28:56+00:00): Nee.. Googlemaps staat los van osm.
eggie (2026-03-24 10:04:15+00:00): De poi's heb ik weer op het gebouw gezet. Daar horen ze. Format phone begint met +31..  Dat laatste aangepast.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-03-24 10:04:51+00:00): Welkomstmail per PB gestuurd met wat handige tips en links.
SANT Interiors (2026-03-24 10:08:14+00:00): Heel fijn dankjewel. Heb jij wellicht nog antwoordt op mijn laatste vraag? mbt leveranciers (zoals postnl etc.) krijgen zei in het systeem door dat dit het afleverpunt is?
eggie (2026-03-24 10:17:42+00:00): Nee, Het is gewoon de locatie van de fysieke winkel. 
We kennen wel delivery_point=yes en delivery_point=no 
Zie wiki
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:delivery_point
Dan zul je dus op twee plaatsen de tag van de winkel moeten zetten.
Wellicht één zonder shop tag, anders krijg je twee winkelsymbolen. 

Ook zal de routingapp van het bezorgbedrijf moeten kunnen omgaan met die tag.
OSM geeft de voorwaarden, de app passen dit wel of niet toe. 
De poi met de fysieke winkel kan beter geplaatst worden waar de winkel zich echt bevindt.
SANT Interiors (2026-03-24 10:30:50+00:00): Wat wij eigenlijk graag willen is dat : 

Tag 1: 
- Klanten via de hoofdingang binnen komen.
- Algemene post (enveloppen) via hoofdingang. 
-Moet ik aangeven waar dit punt is?

Tag 2: Pakket punt, leveranciers punt. tag 2 staat voor nu op de juiste plek, echter symbool is dan niet logisch. Dit moet wellicht een pakket logo zijn voor leveranciers?
SANT Interiors (2026-03-24 10:32:18+00:00): In het ergste geval mogen brievenpost ook via tag2.
eggie (2026-03-24 10:38:34+00:00): De winkels zou je op de fysieke locatie kunnen zetten.
Die bezorgingang op een node verbonden met de gebouwomtrek... en dan entrance=yes gebruiken  plus die deliverytag en de winkelnaam.
Dan niet shop= toevoegen.
Evt description=  Locatie bezorgdiensten.
eggie (2026-03-24 10:42:57+00:00): Nog even gekeken
entrance =service 		A backdoor to a building or enclosed area often only for employees or for delivering. 

Dus ipv entrance=yes >> entrance=service gebruiken. Zie verder boven.
Of het allemaal werkt is een 2de :)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:entrance
SANT Interiors (2026-03-24 10:54:15+00:00): Nou we moeten er op letten dat dit een verzamelpand is, dus denk voor nu dat het wel redelijk staat? Klanten gebruiken toch vaker google maps. Of OSM moet op andere systemen ook werken (waze of andere navigatie apps).
eggie (2026-03-24 11:07:34+00:00): Waze is ook een eigen platform met een community.
Osm wordt in ontelbare  apps gebruikt van OsmAnd, Flismeister  tot TomTom.
SANT Interiors (2026-03-24 12:22:25+00:00): Oke, nou we gaan zien hoe dit in zijn werking verloopt voor leveranciers. Dankjewel en als je nog tips hebt met de info die ik gestuurd had, hoor ik het graag!
zstadler (2026-04-28 20:19:59+00:00): היי,

תוכל בבקשה להסביר את המחיקה הזו?
הרכס לא קיים?
zstadler (2026-05-06 16:04:24+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182302176
A67-A67 (2026-03-24 09:50:23+00:00): There are two correct ways to do this:
- changing the shop key to disused:shop
- changing the shop key-value pair to shop=vacant
I've changed both disused shops to the first option.
Conradm (2026-03-24 10:00:51+00:00): Thanx, first option is the best as they are converted to residential/housing use
Senihtu (2026-03-25 05:54:56+00:00): Hi!
Dieses  Changeset stimmt nicht so ganz. 
Fährt die Tram 3 Richtung Lobeda immer über Gleis 3 (und nicht mehr über Gleis 2)? Dann sollte man das in der Route entsprechend ändern.
Oder fährt sie manchmal über 2 und manchmal über 3? Dann müsste man genaugenommen eine weitere Route erstellen und in den Route Master aufnehmen.
oder noch etwas anderes?
Auf alles Fälle gehören Wege nicht in den Route-Master sondern in die Routen.
Happy Mapping
Senihtu
Fizzie-DWG (2026-05-09 04:54:11+00:00): DWG revert - poor quality mapping

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182408649
nevw (2026-03-24 22:30:11+00:00): Hi, this relation is not a valid construct for multipolygons.
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=137.55238&lat=-33.04679&zoom=16
Generally this happens when mappers use a multipolygon to collect things together.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon
In general multipolygon rings cannot share sides. See the invalid examples at the link.
GeeMaps! (2026-03-24 22:47:03+00:00): Thanks, Nev. It was all looking OK, but when I then added the "scrub" it covered everything, including the carparks, so I thought it would need an MP? What's the solution then, to show that the whole area is scrub, except for some of the range areas, carparks etc?
nevw (2026-03-24 23:11:48+00:00): sorry, I didn't recognise the name and how experienced you are when sending the message. It is a very complex area to map. I think I would start with a separate multipolygon for the scrub and then likely map the rest with simple polygons or smaller MPs for some parts.
GeeMaps! (2026-03-25 03:28:59+00:00): Not a prob, mate, because "how experienced" is something I'm NOT when it comes to MPs! I usually try to avoid them like the plague!
Tatfahren (2026-03-24 16:41:40+00:00): Das wird jedoch nicht explizit benötigt, da du auf allen hw=residential in Deutschland mit dem Rad fahren darfst (sofern nicht durch Beschilderung verboten).

"bicycle=yes" ist stattdessen für die Beschilderung "Fahrrad frei" gedacht, wenn zum Beispiel VZ250 mit Anlieger frei verwendet worden wäre.
melbournefan (2026-04-20 08:29:00+00:00): Hi, it appears that you've changed the tags to remove a multistory car park, it's unusual that a carpark would suddenly turn into a hospital building.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180344348
Kovoschiz (2026-03-24 11:09:51+00:00): 1. Please don't remove `landuse=railway` , as `railway=depot` isn't established yet. `landuse=` on point is allowed. 
2. Don't use `amenity=school` for "schools" for universities, nor buildings. The IC `building=` needs to be split. 
3. Why are you removing `ref=` ?
eggie (2026-03-24 10:07:28+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
MRichtGou (2026-03-24 10:15:23+00:00): Dank,  Ik maak al een tijd gebruik van OSM (zonder te editten) maar vanmorgen een nieuw account aangemaakt op een nieuw emailadres (in het kader van 'weg van outlook/hotmail en gmail). Het lijkt me leuk om bijdragen te leveren aan de kaart voor zaken uit mijn omgeving. Dit leek me een mooie start (dingen verwijderen is ook lekker makkelijk natuurlijk ;-).  Maar er is genoeg info beschikbaar zie ik om meer te weten te komen over hoe de dingen correct te doen. daarnaast is er een actieve community heb ik begrepen....
eggie (2026-03-24 10:20:28+00:00): Yep...  Neus maar eens rond op het forum.
In het kader van het grote weghalen heb ik de natural=scrub verwijderd, maar wellicht kan het terrein ook wat opgeschoven worden van het bedrijf?
Mapse
eggie (2026-03-24 10:21:24+00:00): Overigens had je gewoon je emailadres kunnen aanpassen in je oudere account.
MRichtGou (2026-03-24 10:25:39+00:00): Ah.. OK..  Mooi.. Dat kan vaak ook niet... maargoed.. (In die zin valt het niet mee om van emailadres te wisselen merk ik.. soms kun je alles aanpassen behalve email adres.  En ook een eye-opener om te zien op hoeveel plaatsen je je email adres gebruikt.. ) 
Maar ik heb op het andere account niet veel historie. Ik zal overigens dat oude account opheffen...  (om het netjes te houden). Dan ga ik hier verder en bouw ik hier historie op van mijn bijdragen...
Met groet, Marcel
eggie (2026-03-24 10:29:59+00:00): 👍
MRichtGou (2026-03-25 08:42:51+00:00): Mogge!,  Nog een vraagje.. Hoe lang duurt het eigenlijk voor een wijziging te zien is in de openbare kaart?
Gr.
Marcel
eggie (2026-03-25 08:46:39+00:00): Hoi.. Op de standaardkaart direct.
Paar keer ctrl- f5 toetsen als je op je pc kijkt. Je cache leegmaken van je scherm.
Gr eggie
eggie (2026-03-25 08:47:35+00:00): Beetje in en uitzoomen helpt ook wel.
MRichtGou (2026-03-25 08:49:18+00:00): Ah.. thanx.. Het was idd de cache..  
Fijne dag nog (en bedankt voor de snelle respons!)
odinthelocal (2026-03-24 10:02:53+00:00): forgot to add sources: local knowledge, aerial imagery.
ajmat (2026-03-25 10:09:51+00:00): Reverted in changeset id: 180398836
NeisBot (2026-03-24 10:24:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/6640764585 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Shared apartment"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-04-01 10:33:07+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/180346306
Supaplex (2026-03-24 11:58:35+00:00): Revert the vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180350379