piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
kapazao (2025-12-15 09:32:41+00:00): I understand that the rules about automatic editions are made to avoid problems with database and so other users understand these changes. This was made by a user with experience and this was well explained in the changeset and the wiki about education=* so I do not understand this as the only thing I do is fixing a problem fast and not letting hundred of users losing their time going 1 by 1 that is totally absurd.

Also I understand the problem you comment with a relation and maybe there are some more, but you should understand that was not a problem made by only adding the tag education but made before. I could have checked for errors after that changeset to fix them but this time I did not do it as I usually do. It is ok to check those problems but I am not the one who made them. It is good we have found them thanks to this.

As you comment reverting this is not a solution to the problem as iD recommends it and other users can do the same as me in small parts as the tag is approved and the wiki shows it like that. That would only make everyone losing time.

If there is a problem with that tagging I think it should be fixed in other way first and I would have no problem on fixing it if neccessary.

Thank you for your comments.
Regards
NeisBot (2025-11-22 12:49:41+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 25 potential crossings.

Problematic elements (top 3 by category):
https://osm.org/way/1191052310 v7 | crossings=8
https://osm.org/way/1191052309 v8 | crossings=8
https://osm.org/way/1252674059 v3 | crossings=3

Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/13323947060 v1

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=174985253
Senihtu (2025-11-23 08:39:47+00:00): Guten Morgen!
Führt Relation 19870661 in Oberursel tatsächlich vom Alten Friedhof über die FLandstraße und Adenauerallee zum Bahnhof? 
Ich dachte da sei  (für mich sehr unbequem) seit Jahrzehnten Einbahnstraße?
oder gibt es da jetzt eine Ausnahmebeschilderungen für Busse?
Gruß Senihtu
309_308_307 (2025-11-23 08:43:29+00:00): Hallo, bei dem Abschnitt bin ich mir tatsächlich nicht sicher. Es ist aber die einzige Möglichkeit von Stierstadt Bahnhof nach Oberursel Bahnhof zu kommen und an der passenden Halteposition anzukommen. Vielleicht wird ja der Bus wirklich für ein paar Meter zum Geisterfahrer.

Sollte aber von jemandem geprüft werden der mit dem Bus schon mal gefahren ist (der fährt nur nachts).
Senihtu (2025-11-23 09:31:57+00:00): Auf https://www.rmv.de/auskunft/rmv/app/#!P|TP!H|597532 sieht man einen Bus S5N auf Weingärtenumgehung und Oberhöchstadter Straße.
Ich bin mir aber nicht sicher, ob das eine zulässige Quelle ist. und nachts fahre ich nicht mit dieser Linie. Mist. Dann bleibt das Problem wohl bestehen.
einen schöenen Sonntag noch!
NorthCrab_upload (2025-11-22 13:41:10+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10916515377
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13323968069

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
kortgodt (2025-11-24 08:07:21+00:00): Separat markeret cykelsti på Thorvaldsensgade er ikke blevet tilbageført til eksisterende vejprofil som det burde være. Du er kun halvt i mål her:) Når du tilbagefører cycleways til vejprofilen bør du fjerne bicycle=use_sidepath samtidig
kortgodt (2025-11-24 07:10:43+00:00): Tidligere har du markeret den østlige del af Åboulevarden med cykling ikke tilladt. Nu har du markeret at den har cykelsti selv om det ikke er tilfældet.
OneWheelMapper (2025-11-24 08:00:09+00:00): Godt spottet, det er fikset
NeisBot (2025-11-22 12:48:41+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Merchant services company"
NeisBot (2025-11-22 12:48:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
rempshaener (2025-11-22 16:03:19+00:00): Hallo,
eine Anmerkung zu dem von dir erfassten Hydranten: 
Das Feld "couplings" bleibt bei Unterflurhydranten leer, da es sich um die „Angabe der vorhandenen Anzahl an Schlauchanschlüssen“ handelt, siehe osm.wiki/DE:Key:couplings?uselang=de. Unterflurhydranten haben in der Regel nur mit Standrohr eine Schlauchkupplung. 
Viele Grüße
rempshaener (2025-11-22 16:05:11+00:00): Hallo,
bitte prüfe, ob die Hydranten wirklich "rot" sind. In der Regel passt das bei Unterflurhydranten nicht.
Viele Grüße
ilias_ (2025-11-22 14:00:24+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM!

I'll explain some tags to you:
building:flats is for the number of units in a building. This is an apartment building, so building:flats means the number of apartments in the building. Not very useful. You marked it as 20,000, but the building doesn't have 20,000 apartments. I guess you wanted to add the postcode. That goes into addr:postcode.

building:levels is the number of levels of the building, including the ground floor, meaning this building has 6 levels.

addr:city is, well, the city. But there's really no need to add it because there's already a city boundary for Casablanca, and everything that's inside it already has Casablanca as the address.

There's no need to add a point for "apartment complex". You already added all the info to the building.

You can also notice the building is badly mapped. That's the case in most of Morocco, but you can nicely draw them yourself by mapping an area, selecting it and clicking Q to square it, and marking it as an apartment building. You can check out quartier Racine where I drew all the buildings.

Thanks and welcome again!
Mr FELGO (2025-11-22 14:05:03+00:00): Yes, I actually filled the informations correctly, but for some reason the values went in the wrong placeholders, we'll fix it, Thank you

We found the address location totally wrong, and we had to fix it for our new project, AlloSyndic, soon available on web. The app is AI assisted and intend to bring transparency accross council members residents.

Thanks again !
Fraxi (2025-11-22 13:29:17+00:00): Мерси. Аз се чудех дали да не го трия адреса отдеве...
rempshaener (2025-11-22 16:01:23+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.
Du hast gleich mehrere Straßen so verschoben, dass ich es manuell nicht mehr korrigiert bekommen habe und daher alle deine Änderungen in diesem Changeset rückgängig machen musste.
Das kann am Anfang mal passieren. Bitte melde dich, wenn du Fragen hast.
Viele Grüße
Fraxi (2025-11-22 13:32:43+00:00): :D
ChrissW-R1 (2025-11-22 23:15:16+00:00): Please check https://osm.org/note/5064170
Youness_ss (2025-11-23 10:26:21+00:00): Thank you for correctin my mistake
ilias_ (2025-11-23 12:17:05+00:00): No worries
JeroenHoek (2025-11-22 14:50:06+00:00): Top. Dat zal nog wel iets verfijnd worden naarmate ze de werkzaamheden afronden. De loop van het water en de verkorte pijp kloppen zo in ieder geval mooi.
rempshaener (2025-11-22 16:09:44+00:00): Hallo,
auch hier musste ich einen Teil deiner Anpassungen (ohne Datenverlust) rückgängig machen.
Viele Grüße
tomhukins (2025-12-03 17:52:34+00:00): Please remember to write helpful, descriptive changeset comments.  This modifies eight different ways and adds four, but the description "track" makes it hard for reviewers to understand what you did and why you did it: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
eggie (2025-11-22 14:52:24+00:00): Beste PeetX  Dit is taggen voor de renderer en dat is niet de bedoeling.
Je maakt van een bos iets anders en van het gebouw een sneeuwlandschap.
Je edits zal ik terugdraaien.


MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-11-22 14:54:55+00:00): reverted by changeset #174991845
PeetX (2025-11-22 15:21:20+00:00): Snowworld is een een wintersport ski area. snowworld in landgraaf is ook als dat type aangegeven. kan je het toch als dat type laten staan.
PeetX (2025-11-22 15:22:10+00:00): wellicht had ik ook dat bos links aangetikt. en dat is inderdaad niet de bedoeing
eggie (2025-11-22 15:27:22+00:00): Hoi.. 
Yep dat bos zal een vergissing zijn.
Hwt staat nu getagd als leisure=sports_centre.
Een gebouw lijkt me geen landuse..
Ik zie dat een andere mapper ook doorlopend zaken aanpast naar landuse.. 
Anders een vraagje voor het forum bij korte vragen korte antwoorden?
Mvg..
eggie
eggie (2025-11-22 15:32:29+00:00): Snowworld Landgraaf is als volgt hetagd
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/283482300#map=19/50.875297/6.021227
Voor zover ik kan zien geen landuse=winter_sports
eggie (2025-11-22 15:36:35+00:00): Dit waren je edits 

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=174989386

Je hebt geen type toegevoegd.
Dat kun je uiteraard nog doen

piste:difficulty = easy (oid)
piste:type =snow_park

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-11-22 15:37:53+00:00): Je hebt nooit een welkomstmail ontvangen zie ik.. Bij deze Alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
bartgron (2025-11-23 21:51:22+00:00): Witaj, skąd informacje odnośnie takiej numeracji? W oficjalnym źródle widnieje poprzednia numeracja
tomhukins (2025-12-03 17:55:29+00:00): Again, the description "track" makes these changes hard to understand and review.
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:44:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321625 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Ukraine
Dodko (2025-11-24 09:27:39+00:00): Tu tiež chýba
addr:place=Bošianska Neporadza
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=175057233
NorthCrab_upload (2025-11-22 14:31:07+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10032814215
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/229425211

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:44:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321600 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Sweden
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2025-11-26 00:16:01+00:00): Merhaba. Lütfen birden fazla ili kapsayan değişiklikleri tek seferde yapmayınız. Bkz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:44:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321600 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Sweden
BCNorwich (2025-11-23 08:45:02+00:00): Bridge tag removed from 7km long highway.
BCNorwich (2025-11-23 08:39:57+00:00): Way: 1452795552 removed, it duplicated an existing highway and was tagged as a 28km long bridge.
olo81 (2026-04-10 22:38:59+00:00): Dojazdy pożarowe w lasach oznaczamy w relacji. Nazwy dojazdów to nie nazwy drogi. Tak że nazwy które dodałeś są do usunięcia. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:route%3Demergency_access
magik1969 (2026-04-11 08:04:17+00:00): Żadnych nazw raczej nie ruszałem. Czy chodzi Ci o refy?
olo81 (2026-04-11 11:23:47+00:00): A rzeczywiście, nie zwróciłem uwagi że refy renderuje jak nazwy. Ale te refy też są w relacji tak że przypięte do samej drogi nie wiadomo czym są. I ref to sam numer.
magik1969 (2026-04-11 13:24:52+00:00): Wyślij proszę link do obiektu, żebyśmy na pewno rozmawiali o tym samym.
olo81 (2026-04-11 14:42:59+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/74411086
magik1969 (2026-04-11 16:28:10+00:00): Rozmawialiśmy chyba na ten temat w zeszłym roku.  
Miałem nadzieję, że zrozumiałeś, albo przynajmniej zaakceptowałeś fakt, że tagi ref dla dróg i dla związanych z nimi relacjami NIE WYKLUCZAJĄ SIĘ WZAJEMNIE.  
Według tej zasady opisane są prawie wszystkie drogi krajowe i wojewódzkie w Polsce i chyba nie przychodzi Ci do głowy, żeby to zmieniać.
Jeżeli nie wierzysz mi na słowo, to poczytaj: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ref  
Wpis jest długi, więc tu cytat: "It may seem redundant to tag route refs on both ways and relations, but do not remove a ref=* tag from a way just because the way is a member of corresponding route relations:"
Nie mam nic przeciwko tworzeniu relacji dla dojazdów pożarowych. Jeżeli masz wiedzę, czas i chęci możesz robić to bez ograniczeń. Zostaw tylko tagi ref dla dróg w spokoju.
olo81 (2026-04-11 17:25:11+00:00): Tylko że te ref odnosi się do dojazdu pożarowego a nie samej drogi.
olo81 (2026-04-11 17:32:00+00:00): I dodatkowo to nazwa a nie ref. Bo ref to sam numer.
magik1969 (2026-04-11 19:01:18+00:00): >Tylko że te ref odnosi się do dojazdu pożarowego a nie samej drogi.  
Nie wiem, dlaczego tak piszesz. Tag ref może być przypisany do relacji, drogi lub nawet węzła. 

>I dodatkowo to nazwa a nie ref. Bo ref to sam numer.  
Autostrady i drogi ekspresowe w Polsce mają też literę w wartości ref (S1, A4), ale drogi krajowe i wojewódzkie już faktycznie nie.
Przemyślę jeszcze sprawę ale chyba zrezygnuję ze stosowania przedrostka literowego (DP) w tagach ref dla dróg oznaczonych w terenie jako dojazdy pożarowe
Dodko (2025-11-24 09:25:17+00:00): Ak obec nemá pomenovanie ulíc treba vyplniť aj addr:place v tomto prípade addr:place=Újazd
Andrea Musuruane (2025-12-09 15:02:48+00:00): Ciao. 3 è il numero del sentiero, non il suo nome. Il tag da usare pertanto è ref e non name. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174991982
pancaldi (2025-12-09 16:11:45+00:00): Ok. Grazie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-22 15:01:15+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 174943346, 174944259.
BCNorwich (2025-11-23 08:25:53+00:00): Hi,
I've removed the bridge and layer tag from the 17km section of highway.
BCNorwich (2025-11-23 08:29:35+00:00): I also removed the water=lake from the highway.
Tomas09 (2025-11-22 15:31:22+00:00): (trouwens waarschijnlijk best verkeerd maar denk ik wel het beste wat ik voor nu kan doen.)
eggie (2025-11-22 19:57:02+00:00): https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=51.9856710&lon=5.8446459&zoom=19&camera.phi=5.734
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-04 01:50:35+00:00): Hello!

You used
landuse=educational
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/322896806/history

Have you maybe meant
landuse=education
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
empty_child (2026-02-04 06:51:54+00:00): Ouch. I wanted to substitute amenity=school with landuse and missed the value, sorry. Moved on relation above fence (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20170945)
MassCartog (2025-11-22 15:55:31+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM. Thanks for updating the map in this area, unfortunately you seemed to have dragged and connected nodes all over the place, damaging other data. You have made roads and sidewalks pass though buildings. Your changeset has been reverted. Feel free to try your edits again, but be careful to not move anything you don't mean to move, and before committing your changes address all warnings the editor gives you. Thanks
pitscheplatsch (2025-11-22 16:37:48+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174994425

Thanks, MassCartog
eggie (2025-11-22 18:25:11+00:00): Dag -syn

Daar staat toch gewoon een picnictafel. Je hebt 'm verwijderd?

MVG
eggie
-syn (2025-11-22 18:27:16+00:00): Ik liep er langs, en er stond tot mijn verassing geen tafel! De tegels liggen er nog wel. Misschien komt hij later terug? Huidige situatie is dat er niks staat.
eggie (2025-11-22 18:27:26+00:00): Ik heb de picnic teruggezet.
eggie (2025-11-22 18:29:06+00:00): Oke... Dan kan die voorlopig weg.
Je commentaar was 174993475

Specify whether various amenities are covered   
Vandaar....
Zal 'm weer verwijderen.
Mapse
eggie
CurlingMan13 (2026-01-09 18:15:16+00:00): Please try a little harder to put this next to a road.  You put it way out in the farm field, which I assume is incorrect.
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:35:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
Bekudio (2025-11-23 08:18:05+00:00): Hallo Troistorfer,

Du gestaltest die Häuser wirklich ausgesprochen schön. Es freut mich, solche Gebäude zu sehen. 
https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=50.8100256&lon=7.1470144&zoom=21&camera.theta=51.066&camera.phi=-3.724

Ich bin auch auf dieser Schiene unterwegs und wollte dich fragen ob du irgendwelche Hilfsmittel benutzt.
Denn bei mehreren Balkonen übereinander wird es ja doch recht schnell unübersichtlich.


Bisher erstelle ich alles von Hand. Nur manchmal nehme ich Inkscape, um mir eine SVG-Grafik zu erstellen, die ich dann in JOSM importiere.

Hier zwei meiner Punkte, an denen ich gerade arbeite.
https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=53.5782335&lon=9.7852675&zoom=19&camera.theta=35.26

https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=48.2404932&lon=11.4466028&zoom=19

Liebe Grüße, Bernd
jbcharron (2025-11-22 15:59:57+00:00): Bonjour,
Vos modifications sont erronées, merci de ne pas renseigner n'importe quoi dans la base données OpenStreetMap.
Vos modifications vont être annulées
Jean-Baptiste
Marcos Dione (2026-04-04 11:09:37+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27288887

Shouldn't we change this to 

highway=bridleway

which implies foot=yes and bicycle=yes https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dbridleway
Martinummo (2026-04-06 16:50:32+00:00): Hallo Marcos, ich war vor Ort (am Großparkplatz) und die dort aufgestellten Verkehrsschilder (DE:240;238) gemäß dem Verkehrszeichentool (https://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/) gemappt. Ich würde mich wundern, wenn dies heute anders ist, die Schilder waren neu. Viele Grüße
Marcos Dione (2026-04-08 07:57:07+00:00): Thanks for the clarification. Bridleway implies foot and bike, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dbridleway I set it to that. Vielen danke.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-11-29 01:20:35+00:00): DWG revert - apparent fictitious mapping

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175259904
Fizzie-DWG (2025-11-24 01:09:07+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18995
NeisBot (2025-11-22 16:36:04+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 17 potential crossings.

Problematic elements (top 3 by category):
https://osm.org/way/116931527 v5 | crossings=7
https://osm.org/way/1033116722 v2 | crossings=6
https://osm.org/way/1033116721 v2 | crossings=4

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=174995387
pitscheplatsch (2025-11-22 20:11:43+00:00): Have been corrected by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174997286
czebureks (2026-07-31 12:50:15+00:00): Cześć, dzięki za aktualizację. Czy mógłbyś wskazać dokładniej, gdzie się znajduje ten krzyż: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13324538555 ? W tej chwili jest zmapowany na jezdni. Niestety nie widziałem go nigdzie będąc na miejscu, choć zwykle zwracam uwagę na takie obiekty. Polecam dla takich miejsc podkład Mapbox - zdjęcia są starsze, ale drzewa mniej zasłaniają.
Frank Peng (2025-12-04 15:10:17+00:00): It looks like you edited or adjusted the commercial area in this changeset rather than just "Add" it since you already added it.
user_5359 (2025-12-01 09:05:27+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1450938379. Did you mean fieldcomplex instead of feildcomplex?
Udarian (2025-11-22 19:21:56+00:00): the wikidata entry you changed the village of Miami Shores to point to says it is in Indonesia but the boundary relation you edited is in the US so I doubt that this is correct.
silversurfer83 (2025-11-22 17:46:16+00:00): Hello MK1,

as you are possibly aware we do have some guidelines to how we work at OSM.

One of these is:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

If you touch a country it is advisable to explain *why* you did so.

Also, please use the language of the area you worked in or English in your comment. Thank you.
MK 1 (2025-11-22 21:15:20+00:00): Hello. Sorry. I used the name in macedonian for european France => Европска Франција.
Frank Peng (2025-12-05 03:21:06+00:00): You don't need to delete existing roads and redraw them anew. It's better to modify their geometry or change their tags instead of deleting the roads. This helps preserve the history on OSM. I talked to you about deleting existing elements and redrawing them anew on the map in a few of your changesets (You can find your discussed changesets here: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=9370870). You just have to modify their geometry or edit their tags instead of deleting the elements.

I saw in this changeset that you deleted a driveway as seen here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/20597830 and then drew an alley in its place. You can just change the road's tags instead of deleting the road and redrawing it anew. For the driveway you deleted, you could've just changed its tags to highway=service and service=alley and modified its geometry, instead of deleting the driveway and drawing a new alley in its place.

I do encourage you to read this OSM Wiki article on keeping the history on OSM, so this is brought to your attention to keep in mind for the future: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history

I also encourage you to read the OSM Wiki article on good practice on OSM, so you can be a better OSM mapper next time: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice