piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Glassman (2024-12-04 17:46:50+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159898097
Coehill (2024-12-06 17:50:31+00:00): This changes breaks the address interpolation on the way #177927724.  It looks like it was an accident, so can you please fix this?
Coehill (2025-03-17 16:28:45+00:00): Please fix this. When you moved node #1883271622 from 43.5534699, -80.2640403 to 43.5545440, -80.2638716, it broke the address interpolation.  

Addresses are used by many apps such as Lyft, Trip Advisor, The Weather Channel, Strava, and others.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-12-03 22:01:04+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1339335275
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1339943771

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
emersonveenstra (2024-12-04 11:49:27+00:00): Hi there,

Generally it's not correct to have two different ways for the same road unless there's physical separation (like the intersection below it). From what I can tell, there was nothing wrong with the intersection before, but I might have missed something, what made you think that turns weren't allowed before?
Aenet (2024-12-04 13:24:41+00:00): Oops, I guess I forgot to check if I had all my ways downloaded there, I didn't see that there was already a link. I removed it and added to older one to the bus route.
Aenet (2024-12-04 13:26:24+00:00): added *the* older one to the bus route [CATA route 1].
gspeed (2025-03-22 11:47:46+00:00): Hi, why you set oeway=yes as part of this changeset? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1339946059 

reverting
kalakura (2025-03-22 12:03:17+00:00): The road splits, its divided by a traffic island which also acts as a shelter for the pedestrian crossing
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-28 21:01:51+00:00): Can you read and follow https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments ?
b-jazz (2024-12-29 02:41:35+00:00): Hey there Numac,
Thanks for the golf course contributions to OSM. I notice that you're putting in what I call "lollipops" when you are drawing the fairway around something like a sandtrap. The proper way is to just draw the complete fairway and the complete sandtrap as is, then select them both and "combine" them (in iD) into a "multipolygon". If you need help, please reach out and I'll help you along. Thanks!
blackboxlogic (2024-12-29 18:24:17+00:00): Reverted in 160762941
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159898727
Bobbi123 (2025-01-13 11:43:55+00:00): Deine Eintragung der ehem. Bahnstrecke ist nicht konform zur OSM-Regelung für abgerissene Bahnstrecken (razed/abandoned). Ich bitte dich daher, jene Streckenteile wieder ersatzlos zu löschen, die definitiv nicht mehr ohne weitere Kenntnis als ehem. Bahnstrecke erkennbar sind.

Zudem ist Bayernatlas keine für OSM zugelassene Quelle, weshalb auch deshalb deine Änderung hier nicht korrekt ist.

Danke im Voraus.
Bobbi123 (2025-01-13 11:47:09+00:00): Hinweis: Hier gilt es mehr zu beachten als auf LiniePlus...
Glassman (2024-12-04 17:49:21+00:00): #TIP: square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q"

Also, we typically only add addresses to the main buildings.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159898815
Glassman (2024-12-04 17:51:04+00:00): The path you added near East Midway Road and North Little Spokane Drive should connect to the to roads. That allows routers to give directions to the path. Can you fix it?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159898815
NorthCrab_upload (2024-12-03 22:30:53+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/615492845

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
ssundell (2024-12-14 22:19:29+00:00): Talvella tuosta polusta oli maanomistaja merkinnyt puolet kielletyksi, eli kyltit oli tuon privateksi merkitsemäni läntisen polun osan molemmissa päissä. Lumella siinä meni selkeä polku, mutta enpä ole tuolla päin sen jälkeen käynyt.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-12-03 22:50:59+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/615492845

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
D R Syfydrin (2024-12-03 23:06:14+00:00): And changed incorrect foot way and road.
blackboxlogic (2024-12-29 17:20:09+00:00): This golf course hasn't existed for over 10 years. Why do people keep adding it back? If I ask you to fix your mistake and undo all of this, is there any chance of that happening?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159899769
blackboxlogic (2024-12-29 18:24:37+00:00): Reverted in 160762941
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159899769
NorthCrab_upload (2024-12-03 23:21:05+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2395149604
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2395149602
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2395149601
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/537002569
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/537002571
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/537002573

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
blackboxlogic (2024-12-29 17:36:47+00:00): You've deleted addresses. Please don't. People use this map for navigating to addresses and you're making that worse.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159900239
blackboxlogic (2024-12-29 18:24:53+00:00): Reverted in 160762941
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159900239
5m4u9 (2024-12-04 02:17:29+00:00): Hola bienvenid@!

Vi que añadiste una ruta de bus en Sucre, qué genial.

Viendo la ruta (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18369100) hay varias sugerencias que veo:

* El nombre, el nombre que ponemos a la relación es Bus #: Inicio → Fin. 

* ajustar recorrido, viendo la ruta completa (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18369100) parece que va de este a oeste, pero hay muchas vías donde gira y vos no cortaste las vías dibujadas donde gira. 

Si tienes dudas o preguntas de añadir rutas de buses puedes escribir aquí o mandarme un mensaje pinchando en el nombre de usuario....
Glassman (2024-12-04 17:58:40+00:00): The two trails you added don't connect to any streets or sidewalks which makes them un-routable. Are they connected to a street or sidewalk? If so can you connect them? 

Also, the Herons Nest Trail just ends in the middle of the woods. Is that correct?
Mountains To Sound GIS (2024-12-05 00:20:30+00:00): I connected to street for routing
Glassman (2024-12-05 01:11:46+00:00): Thanks - I see you changed your user name. Had me confused :)

Thanks for fixing.
mtsgis (2024-12-05 01:18:18+00:00): Sure thing.  I am updating trails and designing a map for a non-profit that develops and stewards trails in the Greenbelt
mos_next_door (2024-12-04 06:47:31+00:00): Хин Ереванци в третичные мне кажется оверкилл)
Greg91 (2024-12-04 20:29:34+00:00): Кусок, что между Северным проспектом и Кохбаци - интенстивно используется как транзитный, а не для доступа к домам (гораздо больше through, чем residents). А остальным кусочки, кажется, не менял,оставил residential: там, действительно, либо просто очень мало трафика, либо он для доступа к домам
Greg91 (2024-12-04 20:55:32+00:00): ПС: Хин Ереванци к востоку от Северного проспекта, возможно, тоже достоит статуса третичности, если по нему много проезжает транзитного потока, но я в этом меньше уверен - надо обратить внимание
mos_next_door (2024-12-05 09:33:41+00:00): Справедливо) Мне казалось, что она слишком узкая и запаркованная для серьезного транзита, но бываю нечасто, не наблюдал толком. Ну и рендер двойной tertiary на дальних масштабах ужасен (знаю, что мапить под него не надо)
kitsee (2024-12-12 13:01:56+00:00): Hi there, you appear to have incorrectly moved this power pole https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12148557486
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159902042
D R Syfydrin (2024-12-12 20:48:23+00:00): So sorry! Actually baffled by how thats happened?

So annoying when working on buildings as people mass import data such as, Roads that dont line up and power lines that smash through homes and need to be moved to create building=yes.

No idea how one stray one ended up down there?
kitsee (2024-12-12 21:15:30+00:00): *guy who imported power lines in this area. XD I do check each line as I import them but when you got thousands of poles to do you cant spend too much time on each so they are meant to be rough and people can improve the accuracy later.
Frank Peng (2026-05-12 20:25:31+00:00): Please never delete existing map objects. Doing so is against OSM's Terms of Use. I see here that you deleted a valid residential road (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1133008424/history), when you could've just extended the road instead.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159902435
blackboxlogic (2024-12-29 17:41:43+00:00): You changed the river into not-a-river and the icerink into a forest.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159902488
blackboxlogic (2024-12-29 18:25:06+00:00): Reverted in 160762941
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159902488
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-12-04 23:50:59+00:00): Please don't delete roads.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159902528
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-12-04 23:51:55+00:00): reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159937178
citrula (2024-12-04 07:45:50+00:00): The school name should either be on the point,the buidling, or an area surrounding the entire campus - not several of them at once.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159902540
citrula (2024-12-04 07:46:52+00:00): The school name should either be on the point,the buidling, or an area surrounding the entire campus - not several of them at once.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159902540
ttcbte3 (2024-12-04 18:30:02+00:00): Thanks for letting me know.
bigmapscaver (2024-12-08 16:15:41+00:00): needs city & postcode tags
bigmapscaver (2024-12-08 16:16:05+00:00): needs city & postcode tags
-io- (2024-12-08 14:21:31+00:00): И она: Магистраль... ?
bigmapscaver (2024-12-08 16:15:51+00:00): needs city & postcode tags
silversurfer83 (2024-12-04 07:44:36+00:00): Hi there :)

thank you for cleaning up the database.

I'd like to ask you to break these changes into smaller chunks the next time, so it's easier for others to review.

Details: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets


happy mapping
silversurfer83
Glassman (2024-12-04 18:00:12+00:00): #TIP: we don't use descriptive names in OSM. Just tag it as building=house. Can you fix?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159903256
Glassman (2024-12-04 18:02:50+00:00): How about building=tiny_house?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159903340
Glassman (2024-12-04 18:03:19+00:00): again, name=Pool is redundant.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159903356
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-18 04:11:13+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165094994
Tomas Straupis (2024-12-04 06:39:17+00:00): Hello. Please do not do changes using AI generated objects. I'm reviewing the changes and deleting most of added objects as they do not exist in reality, are outdated, and almost all objects are misaligned. We have analysed Rapid and it is unusable.
B_A_ (2024-12-04 21:18:36+00:00): Very well. I wish you good luck in your mapping efforts.
bigmapscaver (2024-12-04 14:45:45+00:00): Hey, what was the purpose of this changeset? From what I can tell it looks like you just adjusted some already existing roads?

(Not trying to said it's bad, mostly just curious)
mcliquid (2024-12-04 09:03:29+00:00): Please note for the future: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
Edison Wen (2024-12-04 15:35:52+00:00): Thank you for your reminder, I will pay more attention to it in the future.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-18 04:11:14+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165094994
mueschel (2024-12-07 12:25:05+00:00): Hi,
you used new tags like "recycling:container:silver" here. Could you check if it's possible to add common tags for materials that can be disposed of here instead of colors?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=recycling#Recycling
k127 (2024-12-17 16:44:42+00:00): Hi mueschel, my intention with these tags is to map the count of the recycling and waste containers for each collection location in a way more easy to determine from aerial imagery. Feel free to supplement the common tags for recycling substances. I'd kindly ask you to keep the tags I added, though.
Happy mapping :)
k127
mueschel (2024-12-17 17:40:02+00:00): If your intend is to map the colors of the containers, you should use a simple 'colour' tag. If your intend is to map what and how can be recycled, then the colors are not useful for anybody outside this particular town, because colors vary a lot between places.
TrickyFoxy (2024-12-04 15:15:07+00:00): Этот https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1340097714 ?
mcliquid (2024-12-04 09:03:21+00:00): Please note for the future: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
mcliquid (2024-12-04 08:36:43+00:00): Danke dir! Alles richtig gemacht :)
VictorIE (2024-12-12 07:47:48+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/98613817/

Does Children's Health Ireland occupy the bulk of the hospital? I thought that there were lots of other departments, but that it was a step down in sophistication compared to Beaumont, Mater, etc,
DeBigC (2024-12-12 09:29:43+00:00): There has to be a mistake, the hospital is still multidisciplinary, which must mean that part of it being tagged that way may have been inherited when I resolved the non-existing separation of the two relations/objects.
VictorIE (2024-12-12 11:31:53+00:00): The relation is misbehaving (building=* on two levels, courtyards not showing properly), so I've asked b-unicycling to have a look at it.
VictorIE (2024-12-12 13:40:52+00:00): Looks much better now. I've tidied up the details.
EvanSiroky (2024-12-04 17:44:29+00:00): Keep up the good work! It's so fun to see another local mapper pick up where I left off!
agrifolia (2024-12-05 08:55:01+00:00): Thank you, I've been enjoying improving the map as an antidote to the drivel on social media lately.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-12-04 07:20:55+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10846820833
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/651512017

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Supaplex (2024-12-04 11:41:48+00:00): 已經有了，重覆加了
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4730350#map=16/25.03539/121.54072
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159907719
wambacher (2024-12-06 14:05:53+00:00): Hi, hier ist ja alles falsch:

Ort, Straße, Hausnummer und PLZ.

Verschiebe den Knoten bitte an die richtige Stelle.

Gruß
walter
wambacher (2024-12-06 14:07:43+00:00): Gerade gesehen, das war eine Dublette. Was ist denn jetzt richtig?
Fasse (2024-12-06 20:43:36+00:00): Das sind 2 Niederlassungen. Ich hatte nur leider beim Kopieren vergessen die Adresse anzupassen. Hab ich jetzt gemacht. Besten Dank für den Hinweis.
wambacher (2024-12-07 08:52:38+00:00): danke
Gruß
walter
itineris (2024-12-05 08:45:56+00:00): Szia!

A táblázás szerint ez nem a járdával párhuzamos kerékpárút lesz, hanem közös gyalog- és kerékpárút.

Üdv:
Ákos
airdace (2024-12-05 10:34:26+00:00): Részben igaz (Telepes-Deés u. között gyalog-kerékpárút, Deés-Csömöri között önálló kerékpárút és járda, zöldsávval elválasztva). Javítom.
itineris (2024-12-05 10:41:44+00:00): Nem kell túlzásba vinni, mert amint be lehet menni, fel fogom mérni RTK-val az új aszfaltokat.
Mint ahogyan a Csömörin és a Bonyák utcában/közben is.
airdace (2024-12-05 11:36:12+00:00): OK, köszi. Én az új kerékpáros felületeket igyekszem felvinni, amint lehet. (A BudapestGO kerékpáros navigációja is OSM adatokból dolgozik.)
Pink Duck (2024-12-05 15:25:08+00:00): Weird how auto-correct is contact:x to contact:twitter, the old name, the auto-redirected domain, that is falling out of common use, and near totally in media broadcasts.
mueschel (2024-12-05 15:29:00+00:00): The name of the tag has nothing to do with any website or name of a service.
It's just a well-defined and documented token that is used to link to some online platform. Note how the value is just the user name, and not a full link to any web page. This makes it completely independent from the change of name of the actual service.
Pink Duck (2024-12-05 15:41:11+00:00): There is that benefit I guess, but I just wish all the websites would update their logos and links for efficiency of user agent look-up. So long as the data is there all is good in some discoverable form, just as I've gotten used to sidewalk/soccer terms.
iloveosm2004 (2025-01-02 10:08:20+00:00): Hi, I'm not sure how your routing engine deals with 'oneway:motorcar=yes' tag but it seems that it's not working for now & several times before. So please test & double check this tag for similar wayid(s) in your prod app. Otherwise, I suggest we should align to use 'oneway=yes' combined with 'oneway:bicycle=no' & 'oneway:motorcycle=no' for such cases to prohibit car access from now on
pitscheplatsch (2024-12-05 11:28:02+00:00): Is this just a test? The mapped buildings do not align with the satellite imagery.
Jrachi (2025-01-18 10:49:04+00:00): Ciao.
Mi spieghi cos'è un
not:highway=path
Letteralmente significa:
una non strada che è un sentiero

Ivo
eggie (2024-12-04 12:15:22+00:00): Dag zomaar,

In OSM zijn er al adresnodes. Je hoeft dus geen adressen toe te voegen aan een gebouwomtrek. Ik heb het adres weer verwijderd.

MVG
eggie
NorthCrab_upload (2024-12-04 08:31:02+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Podana kombinacja addr:city + addr:place jest nieprawidłowa. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, usuń addr:place i zastosuj kombinację addr:city + addr:street. Jeśli nie, pozostaw tylko addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/615492845

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
habi (2024-12-04 08:29:09+00:00): "SchlinGe" :)
Thierry1030 (2024-12-04 16:50:42+00:00): Dag Jhowie,
Ik lees in de eerste zin op de website over de wijk dat Monrose de vroegere benaming van de wijk is en dat ze nu Daillywijk heet.  Lees jij ergens iets anders?
Thierry1030 (2024-12-05 20:38:59+00:00): reminder
JhowieNitnek (2024-12-06 19:52:33+00:00): Als je kijk bij deze link over wijkcomitees spreken ze over monrose, 
https://www.1030.be/nl/content/monrose-0
Thierry1030 (2024-12-07 22:46:13+00:00): zie comment van Raphael > https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4532271
eggie (2024-12-04 12:19:00+00:00): Anne Douwe  Je info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode.
Het hek heb ik vastgemaakt aan de toegangsweg.
MVG
eggie
DaanLT (2024-12-04 08:50:59+00:00): Hello, why you have restricted right turn from Rinktinės g. to Turgaus g. ?
EvanSiroky (2024-12-04 17:46:29+00:00): Hello fellow local building mapper! I like your edits!
adamos (2024-12-05 09:34:47+00:00): Když dáte na cesty accesws:private, zakážete tím autobusy a trolejbusy. Je potřeba na cesta dát bus:yes, nebo rovnou psv:yes, tím povolíte MHD. Letňany opravím, ale pozor na to při dalších editacích
Piskvor (2024-12-05 10:23:11+00:00): Zdravím, díky za upozornění, to dává smysl. Měl jsem za to, že private tady značí DPP, a.s. Dám si na to příště pozor.
osmviborg (2024-12-04 08:59:09+00:00): Linket er bag en betalingsmur
b-holdet (2024-12-04 11:59:43+00:00): Her hedder den noget andet:

https://roskilde.dn.dk/nyheder/arkiv/indvielse-af-det-nye-udloeb-fra-store-kattinge-soe-til-gedebaeksrenden/

Hvad er det rette navn og er det hele stykket fra Kattinge Sø til Roskilde Fjord, der skal omdøbes?
UffeKousgaard (2024-12-04 12:30:10+00:00): Forskellige kort og hjemmesider bruger forskellige rodede betegnelser. Selve Langvad Å går fra lige NØ for Lejre Station og så i østlig retning. Langvad Å sammen med en masse andre åer kaldes samlet for Langvad Å-systemet. Den nye strækning har nogen så kaldt for Langvad Å, men det giver ingen mening, da ikke-sammenhængende dele af samme å-system, så skulle hedde det samme. Det meste af den "nye strækning" hed før Gedebæksrenden (i en smallere udgave) og det er nu kommet til at hedde Sankt Hans Å. Der er en lille stump af den oprindelige Gedebæksrende tilbage.
UffeKousgaard (2024-12-04 12:38:47+00:00): På dette kort (https://dataforsyningen.dk/data/2683) har strækningen endnu ikke et navn, men det kommer nok snart.