piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
maxlax (2023-03-17 09:28:43+00:00): Гугл ни аллё, Яндекс может завтра закроют, чем пользоваться планируешь, чем-нибудь платным? Так вот рисуй и поправляй, а не учи как школяра, все райцентры это моя работа, причём сначала их нарисовал как просто кубики домов, потом прошёлся повторно с адреской намного позже, про города врать не буду, не моя работа, про ПГТ опять я, а ты, что сделал ты? ...
maxlax (2023-03-17 09:32:08+00:00): Нарисовал забор, молодец! Я не то что бы преклонных лет, но дело уже к тому идёт, бессонница иногда, рисую даже ночью, компьютера нет на планшете, это не всказке сказать ни пером описать как неудобно и стрёмно выходит, но хоть что-то выходит в отличие от забора, бомбануло просто...
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-03-25 15:46:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134108394 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to vandalism and creating fake objects with nonsense names at random places.
b-holdet (2023-03-17 11:50:30+00:00): Hvad er ideen med at flytte navne ud i egne noder?
b-holdet (2023-03-22 16:57:07+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10741106373 er ikke centrum for Fejrup. Du har placeret punktet i et sommerhusområde. Byen ligger østfor dette sted og er allerede angivet.

Hvor har du navnenes placeringer fra?
b-holdet (2023-03-30 19:38:20+00:00): Har du en kilde til dine by-placeringer?
b-holdet (2023-03-30 19:38:41+00:00): Source please.
gscholz (2023-05-02 06:15:52+00:00): Hi infordemanda,
this changeset has created several errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways:


https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-3.16594&lat=41.82135&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=133779043

As you may know this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps.

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2023-05-07 06:52:39+00:00): Hi infordemanda, 
this error still exits, can I get your feedback here?
Guido
gscholz (2023-05-10 06:33:18+00:00): Hi infordemanda, 
due to your missing response I have reverted this changeset to fix those issues.
Guido
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-03-25 15:46:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134108394 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to vandalism and creating fake objects with nonsense names at random places.
❤️‍🔥 (2023-03-17 09:48:15+00:00): Hi, OpenStreetMap is only for permanent features, we don't map temporary things like events
Syarol (2023-03-17 12:32:28+00:00): Ви дещо зарано перейменували. Рішення йде від 1 травня, до цього вулиці ще будуть використовувати старі назви
Frans S (2023-03-18 11:06:30+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.

You are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.

We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

In iDeditor, zoom in so far that  the hidden objects are visible. ( blue note on bottom line warns about hidden objects)
Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. Just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.

Tag buildings as building=yes. Nothing more, no names.

Please map each building accurate over the rooflines and squared(rectangular only).


Don't connect nodes to other buildings or features.

The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 

Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.

See also this document:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/11PsAW0bzUZHbS8YnbaFzqOYhJY7tSPYG/view?usp=share_link


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133779489
user_3716049 (2023-03-23 21:42:29+00:00): Thanks for note & fixing.
mavl (2023-03-24 10:30:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 134051515, 134045911, 134058112 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible source - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6981].
eggie (2023-03-17 10:30:17+00:00): Prima om zaken toe te voegen.. maar de format van de phone=  is nog steeds verkeerd.
Geen tussennul na +31
Mvg
eggie
eggie (2023-03-18 10:08:46+00:00): Info  naar node verplaatst.. Adres verwijderd van gebouw..
phone format aa ngepast.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-03-17 10:28:21+00:00): Dat is denk ik zo n 'dingetje' van editor iD.
Wanneer je yes aanpast wordt het no.
Kwaad kan het niet.
Die hele regel kan weg. access=no is voldoende.
Gr eggie
NorthCrab_upload (2023-03-17 09:50:26+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2607395002
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2607456566
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2607431662
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2607299337
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2607298241
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/372407842
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/372407844
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/372407847
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/372407849
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/372407853

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Hadi Omid (2023-03-20 12:30:00+00:00): سلام 
لطفا اطلاعات رو فله ای حذف نکنید
ساختمان با مشخصات کامل رو حذف کردید!
zorglubu (2023-03-19 13:05:01+00:00): Bonjour,

Le nom du lieu-dit "Coupe-gorge" (avec un E à coupe) existe sur le cadastre. Pourquoi le supprimer ?

Cordialement.
OSM-TOF (2023-03-17 10:27:14+00:00): I need to apologize - how can this changeset been rolled back as ist has accidentially been submitted on bad BING imagery?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133781869
OSM-TOF (2023-03-17 10:48:52+00:00): If anyone could support and roll back this changeset, that would be greatly appreciated. And again I do apologize for this inconvenience.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133781869
rab (2023-03-19 13:28:13+00:00): du hast doch nur 22 Hütten gelöscht
Romwriter (2023-03-17 18:07:19+00:00): Hallo Konietzko, herzlich willkommen bei Openstreetmap und vielen Dank für Deinen ersten Beitrag. Eine Rückfrage habe ich gleich: Das Gelände von Enno Roggemann <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1013908014> und MERLO <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/675832305> überschneiden sich, das ist so nicht richtig, oder doch? Wo verläuft die Grenze? Beste Grüße, Romwriter
mrpulley (2025-08-13 12:13:38+00:00): Regarding way 342240745 (Burke Wills Road), I wonder if it should be Burke & Wills Road (knowing that the Burke & Wills Expedition passed through this area). DCS Base Map does have 'Burke Wills', but I've seen enough errors in the DCS map to not trust this as a primary source. Road is signposted at both ends as 'Burke & Wills'
TobyOrr (2025-08-13 23:43:46+00:00): 
I appreciate you contacting me. I also appreciate the difficulty in identifying the road name accurately.

To the best of my knowledge, the NSW Address Location Service is the most accurate source as it evolved from confusion over street names and the inability of emergency vehicles to locate some addresses in emergencies. The NSW Govt established this service to ensure all emergency responses had accurate addresses. I recall checking this some time ago and could find only one property using this road as an address and it still showed as valid this morning when I checked using the URL : 
https://maps.six.nsw.gov.au/services/public/Address_Location?houseNumber=2031&roadName=Burke  Wills&roadType=Road&suburb=Balranald&postCode=2715&projection=EPSG%3A4326

The address service gives no confirmation for a property on "Burke and WIlls Road", "Burke & Wills Road" or "Tin Tin Bidura Road".  It is unusual for road names to include "and" or "&" ( I can't think of any other one at the moment)  and perhaps the NSW Address Location Service database cannot cope with "and" or "&" in road names. 

Local governments are the authorities in regard to road names in NSW. In this case, Balranald Shire Council still identifies this road as Tin Tin Bidura Road (I checked the Council's Register of Roads on its website this morning)

It might be best for OSM to show all three names, one as primary name and other two as alternatives so that a search for any of the three names will take a person to this road. I'm not sure how to show two alternate addresses in OSM
perhaps 
name=Burke & Wills Road
source:name=signposts at each end of road
alt_name=Tin Tin Bidura Road
source:alt_name=Balranald Shire Council
old_name=Burke Wills Road
source:old_name=NSW Address Location Service

I was pondering sending an email to Balranald Shire Council but, based on past experience, I expect they will respond with the official name that is in their Register of Roads i.e. Tin Tin Bidura Road so it would not clarify the issue for us. (Bidura is a property near the northern end or the road while Tin Tin is a property in the vicinity of Pitarpunga Lake)

My preference is to include all three names in some way but I am happy for you to make whatever changes you think appropriate.  I have seen some of your work in OSM and I know you are a conscientious mapper and I trust your judgement. You do what you think is correct.
mrpulley (2025-08-15 11:30:39+00:00): Thanks. I've done an update at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170476396, including all three names as suggested.
Devdatta (2023-03-20 06:58:13+00:00): Why are your changesets so big? Please add a meaningful changeset commit message.
chl-osm (2023-06-09 15:51:50+00:00): Vérifié de visu, le marchand de fruits et légumes est bien au 5, entre la boulangerie et la pharmacie. Je me permets de le replacer en présumant une erreur de manipulation mais n'hésitez pas à m'expliquer sinon : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137142309
Rodrigo Rega (2023-03-17 18:35:53+00:00): Antes de nada quisiera darte la bienvenida a OSM. Edito bastante por Lugo y siempre echo un ojo a las últimas ediciones para asegurarme de que sigue todo ok. En esta edición se ha creado una nueva vía (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1154986272#map=19/42.93801/-7.52677) etiquetada como "unclassified". Esta vía debería ser "residential" o tal vez "service". Unclassified se usa para carreteras que unen núcleos de población y son de baja clasificacion. Ya me encargo yo de hacer la correción. Gracias por tus aportes al mapa, por Lugo no somos muchos mapeando. Espero que esto no te desanime a seguir colaborando, al principio es normal tener estos pequeños errores. Un saludo!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133782705
pecege3 (2023-03-18 10:53:38+00:00): Gracias,
Intentaré tenerlo en cuenta la próxima vez.
Un saludo.
chl-osm (2023-04-13 14:41:43+00:00): Hello !
Merci pour la contribution !
Pour la revue, 2 petites choses :
- ça me semble un immeuble résidentiel plutôt que retail, et il contient d'autres boutiques que la supérette Carrefour : je me permets d'extraire ledit Carrefour dans une node dédiée (cf. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/134865895).
- Pour le 'footway', c'est peut-être en doublon avec la rue qui est en 'pedestrian' mais je laisse quelqu'un de plus calé nous en dire plus.
silversurfer83 (2023-03-19 19:55:44+00:00): Hello
Why did you move the trees in London? Looks like one of them is now inside of a building.
Greetings
silversurfer83
silversurfer83 (2023-06-10 20:23:33+00:00): Hi again
would you be so kind as to answer my question?
Msiipola (2023-06-01 15:04:46+00:00): Hi! Most of the buildings you have added here are misplaced. Because your background image Maxar has not been position calibrated. All images in Sweden must be calibrated against the "Trafikverket Road Network". This information should have been given to you and the other tomtom Sweden mappers. Please inform others!
BR_pebble (2023-06-09 10:12:24+00:00): Hi Msiipola,
Thank you for your feedback, and sorry for not getting back to you sooner. I’ll make sure to use this resource when I map in this area in the future.
Msiipola (2023-06-09 14:28:40+00:00): Thanks for your feedback. I will adjust building positions for you.
JeroenvanderGun (2023-12-14 11:44:35+00:00): Een weg onder een viaduct is geen tunnel=yes.
MxxCon (2023-03-19 23:38:00+00:00): Hello.
Can you please elaborate why did you change this? What is the source of this edit?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133783360
Ravi kiran noone (2023-03-20 10:45:15+00:00): Thanks for your Reply

I created Indoor map of airport based on the Official website Map.
website link : -
https://maps.laguardiaairport.com/?s=eyJtYXBSZW5kZXJlciI6eyJ2cCI6eyJsYXQiOjQwLjc3MDE1MywibG5nIjotNzMuODYyMjExLCJ6b29tIjoxNS45MzU0ODQsImJlYXJpbmciOjAsInBpdGNoIjowfSwib3JkIjoyfX0%3D
habi (2023-03-17 13:18:08+00:00): Mersi.
Enock4seth (2023-04-07 11:04:46+00:00): Kindly stop mapping like this and delete the ones you have mapped
James Amattey (2023-04-07 11:15:49+00:00): What do I do in this case
Enock4seth (2023-04-07 11:48:52+00:00): This overpass query https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1ttj will help you find all of them.

Load into JOSM, review and delete/reuse where applicable

You need utils2plugin to replace, more about reusing/replacing here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/utilsplugin2#Replace_geometry_(Ctrl+Shift+G)
James Amattey (2023-04-07 12:11:50+00:00): In this case, the area looks like a savannah which is a land use case. For a project that specifies the mapping of land use features, what do I do in this instance
Enock4seth (2023-07-31 08:58:10+00:00): these are just tiny portions within a larger creating mini-rectangles every where doesn't help anyone, if this something specific to your own project, please do it outside OpenStreetMap. 

Kindly remove all these mini-polygons.
jnighan (2024-06-19 20:19:46+00:00): Hi, landuse=religious is not used in CT for areas that are a single place of worship and minimal other features (parking lot, etc.). It is only used for larger religious campuses, monasteries, etc.
tsp15 (2023-03-22 01:34:07+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1000842895 Tutaj po raz kolejny rozłączyłeś ścieżkę! To stwarza później problemy w routingu.
yambao2618 (2023-03-18 00:35:35+00:00): akina cp ko, alam na namin sino ka surrender muna
Warin61 (2023-03-24 22:51:26+00:00): Name removed from tree relation.

Forest in Australia is taken to be productive use e.g. using trees to produce lumber. The area looks to be natural=wood ... changed. 

bear rock relation deleted - better as simple ways.
Jez Nicholson (2023-05-14 15:34:37+00:00): with respect, a 'terrace' is a block of houses, not each single house within a terrace...they are just a 'house' https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dterrace
UtterClutter (2023-05-15 17:20:32+00:00): Jez, would you be kind enough to exemplify a terrace so that I can see how it is supposed to be done? 
I keep running into a "building within building" validation error.
Jez Nicholson (2023-05-15 19:01:12+00:00): AFAIK the terrace is there for doing rough plotting of all the houses in one go. I don't think you can combine it with houses.
UtterClutter (2025-06-23 12:03:48+00:00): I'm using house=terrace in common practice these days.
Did you get my update on Moulsecoomb North & South Hubs?
Best regards, Tone
Jez Nicholson (2025-06-23 13:26:19+00:00): The benefit of classifying different types of houses will probably only become apparent when we have whole large areas mapped....e.g. "how many detached houses are there in Brighton & Hove?", "How does the pattern of housing change across the City?"....

I did get the note about the Hubs. Good work!

I'm starting to think that mapping every single house in B&H might be possible!
Diógenes de Sinope (2023-04-02 21:59:46+00:00): Olá Ndongala,

O nó que criou neste conjunto de alterações continha informação pessoalmente identificável, o que é contra a política do OpenStreetMap.

https://wiki-openstreetmap-org.translate.goog/wiki/Limitations_on_mapping_private_information?_x_tr_sl=en&_x_tr_tl=pt&_x_tr_hl=en-US&_x_tr_pto=wapp

Tenha isto em mente no que diz respeito às suas contribuições para o mapeamento no futuro.

Tomei a liberdade de remover o nó para si.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-11-13 06:25:48+00:00): dzięki za poprawienie na use_sidepath !
adrianojbr (2023-03-17 14:33:42+00:00): Olá, Bruno!

O único ponto relevante é a conexão entre curso d'água e rua, pois ford=yes é usado somente quando a passagem da estrada se dá por dentro do rio. Ainda mais que o curso d'água foi marcado corretamente como submerso (tunnel=culvert + layer=-1), não faz sentido usar ford.

Abraço!
Supaplex030 (2023-03-18 20:55:44+00:00): Hallo synchron, mir ist hier aufgefallen, dass du die separaten Parkflächen/Parkbuchten bis zur Straßenmitte ziehst. Besser wäre es, wenn die Fläche nur den Bereich umfasst, der tatsächlich der realen Parkfläche entspricht (also nur bis zum Fahrbahnrand). Für Anwendungen (z.B. Routing) ist keine Verbindung zur Straße nötig und die Eigenschaften der Parkbucht (z.B. Flächeninhalt/Raumbedarf, Breite des Parkbereichs) können nur korrekt abgeleitet werden, wenn die Fläche der Realität entspricht.

lg, Alex
wkdgs (2023-03-21 12:01:01+00:00): Hi,

you changed the "name" tag to "name=*". Maps will now show "*" as the name of the street. 

You can remove the "name" tag completely if it has no name. Just remove all text from the "name" field in the iD editor.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133785474
PT-53 (2023-03-18 09:53:38+00:00): Hallo Ygramul,
hast Du überprüft, daß das nicht ein "Kreisverkehr" ist?
Fragende Grüße
Ygramul (2023-03-18 20:56:16+00:00): Ich habe einen Hinweis hinterlassen für Ortskundige, aber generell ist es unüblich, in Wohngebieten, quasi am Ende einer Straße einen Kreisverkehr zu haben. Turning loop wäre noch denkbar; wenn der nördliche Abstecher wirklich nur ein driveway ist. Schilder sind auf den Luftbildern keine zu erkennen. Was es auf jeden Fall _nicht_ ist, ist ein mini_roundabout, wenn da in der Mitte eine Grünfläche ist.
aixbrick (2023-03-17 12:46:04+00:00): Hallo,
du hast hier den Link auf das Foto aus https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3600126 eingetragen ("image"). Das ist gut gemeint, aber nicht sinnvoll. Fotos die mit StreetComplete erstellt wurden, werden einige Zeit nachdem der dazugehörige Hinweis geschlossen wurde gelöscht, d.h. der Link führt dann ins Leere.
Gruß
Christoph Rackwitz (2023-03-17 13:01:35+00:00): 👍 Alles klar, gut zu wissen. Dann lasse ich das besser.
seav (2023-05-13 05:06:51+00:00): Hi! Where is your source that the maritime boundary between Manila and Pasay curves like this? Some of the planned reclamation projects in talks with the City of Manila lies on the Pasay side of the curve you mapped. I think the original line is more accurate.
infeeeee (2023-03-17 21:59:58+00:00): Szia!

Lebontott épületekre a demolished:building=yes címkét szoktuk használni:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:demolished:building

Parkolóautomatákra és az utcai fizetős parkolásra is van már egy nagyjából általánosan használt séma. 

Parkoló automatákon csak a ref számot címkézzük, a parkolással kapcsolatos egyéb infó az adott utcára kerül a street parking séma alapján: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Street_parking

XI. kerületben sokat megcsináltunk már, onnan vehetsz mintát, hogy hogyan kéne. Pl egy ilyen C zónás utcának, ha mindkét oldalon meg lehet állni, a címkézése kb így néz ki:

parking:both:fee = no

parking:both:fee:conditional = yes @ (Mo-Fr 08:00-18:00)

parking:both:maxstay:conditional = 3 hours @ (Mo-Fr 08:00-18:00)

parking:both:orientation = parallel

parking:both:zone = C

Ez a példa innen van: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/264613828

Ha így címkézel egy utcát, akkor pl ez a térkép meg tudja jeleníteni, hogy egy adott pillanatban kell-e fizetni a parkolásért: https://zlant.github.io/parking-lanes/

Volt egy régi fajta címkézézés a parking:lane... séma, még nincs mindenhol frissítve, de már dolgozunk rajta. Macerás a frissítése, mert nem feleltethető meg a régi minden esetben az újjal egyértelműen, nem lehet teljesen automatizálni a frissítést. De ez az új eléggé lefedi az összes lehetőséget, csak figyelj, hogy a régit már ne használd.

További jó térképezést!
eggie (2023-03-17 13:53:23+00:00): Beste Rubenke..
Graag een wat uitvoeriger beschrijving bij je uploads. Dat wordt op prijs gesteld door medemappers.

Met vriendelijke groet..
eggie
Rubenke (2023-03-17 23:15:56+00:00): Ik kan er niet heel veel meer van maken dat het hier een hek betreft eigenlijk.
What else?
eggie (2023-03-18 05:59:59+00:00): Hoi Rubenke...

Nou... What else  :)

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Good_changeset_comments

en algemeen.. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Good_practice



hek toegevoegd.. hek verwijderd.... hek aangepast..

In dit geval bv  'afrastering' ingetekend.

MVG
eggie
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-04-22 14:02:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135228709, 135225625 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to fictional edits.
SekeRob (2023-03-26 17:37:09+00:00): Hi,

any plans to complete '#operationgreen ' as right now several wood/forest areas have disappeared from view.

Cheers.
Mapiate (2023-05-03 14:35:38+00:00): Hi, thanks for your contributions to OSM . Can you provide more descriptive comments in future changesets? It would help nearby users (like myself) understand what you've updated.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-11-12 12:24:52+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10741477234/history has shop = accessories that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
shop=accessories ? What kind of accwessories are sold here? Fashion accessories? Car parts? Gun accessories?

Maybe use shop=fashion_accessories for clothing accessories, shop=car_parts for car accessories or other shop=* instead - see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Daccessories
Rubenke (2023-05-13 21:42:53+00:00): Als je het dan zo nodig terug moet zetten doe het dan op z'n minst goed!!
silversurfer83 (2023-03-19 19:58:18+00:00): Hello there :)
Thank you for contributing to OSM.
I would like to offer two links to articles within the OSM-Wiki for you to read:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Happy mapping
silversurfer83
LennartNB (2023-04-02 21:12:10+00:00): maxspeed on A7 is wrong (it still is 100/120 and NOT none)
Polarbear-repair (2023-04-12 19:01:49+00:00): matejh123, 
could you please specify the source of your edits. 
Your comment translates as "Updates based on restriction images." -- what kind of images do you refer to?
NorthCrab_upload (2023-03-17 13:30:23+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/221526843
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/825878607

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
MxxCon (2023-03-19 23:38:11+00:00): Hello.
Can you please elaborate why did you change this? What is the source of this edit?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133788595
Ravi kiran noone (2023-03-20 10:44:48+00:00): Thanks for your Reply

I created Indoor map of airport based on the Official website Map.
website link : -
https://maps.laguardiaairport.com/?s=eyJtYXBSZW5kZXJlciI6eyJ2cCI6eyJsYXQiOjQwLjc3MDE1MywibG5nIjotNzMuODYyMjExLCJ6b29tIjoxNS45MzU0ODQsImJlYXJpbmciOjAsInBpdGNoIjowfSwib3JkIjoyfX0%3D