piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
phlers (2024-01-24 21:20:59+00:00): ohhh ja vielen Dank für die Hinweise. Bei den Tennisplätzen habe ich dem Hintergrund leider ein Gebäude zugewiesen und keine Fläche.
wireguy (2024-01-22 18:35:50+00:00): Miraculix,  
the treerows are causing the farmyard relation 17057883 to get unclosed errors.  maybe remove them, or make the farmyard a simple way instead of a relation?  Easy to detect the error, if you run the josm validator.
miraculixOSM (2024-01-26 23:28:21+00:00): Sorry, but I can't find any error there. The JOSM error shows a lot of errors at Britt but not this special one. If you think, there is an error you are invited to fix it. Thanks and happy mapping!
miraculixOSM (2024-01-26 23:29:18+00:00): *JOSM validator
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-16 06:54:47+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/965617903/history has construction = construction that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What construction=construction means? What you wanted to express by using this tag?
scheini (2024-03-19 12:43:17+00:00): Hi,

I think I used the key "construction" the wrong way. The value should be the type of building. In this case it is an office building.
I think I am going to change it that way.

Thank you so much for the hint!
canfe (2024-01-21 08:07:45+00:00): Sarebbe meglio non cancellare, se possibile, ma "modificare" in modo da conservare le modifiche nel tempo.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146496612
Frans S (2024-01-21 09:38:13+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. However, Be more precise with mapping and follow the rooflines, (follow the extensions as well)

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146496697
bxl-forever (2024-01-21 11:37:19+00:00): Hallo,

Als deze straat een woonerf is (met F12a bordjes) moet je de volgende tags gebruiken:

highway=living_street
maxspeed=20
source:maxspeed=BE:living_street

(en geen *designated* tags, aub)

Groeten.
GR-menneke (2024-01-21 13:09:45+00:00): Hallo,

Dank je wel voor de tip. ;-)

GRoetjes,
Syl (2024-07-12 15:20:46+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai annulé cette modification, le commerce n'occupe pas tout le bâtiment.
sheldonelectric (2024-07-12 19:14:50+00:00): T'as raison, je crois que le batiment sur la rue est partage avec des apart, mais celui a l'arriere est un batiment industriel apartenant 100% a NOZ. A verifier si tu repasse par la bas, car moi je tarderai a retourner a Rennes!
Ewen Hill (2024-01-21 01:32:36+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap. Can I ask about Branding Yard Trail north and south section. Has this been closed or is it so overgrown it's not passable please ? Is this from a visit to the 'Yangs?  All the best and safe travels.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146497499
Beach_Runner (2024-01-24 10:39:59+00:00): The path has been closed for revegetation and has overgrown. It is barely visible and can only be followed using GPS.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146497499
Beach_Runner (2024-01-24 10:41:20+00:00): I visited the You Yangs on Sunday, 21st Jan, when I ran many of the paths in the area.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146497499
Ewen Hill (2024-01-24 23:07:34+00:00): Thanks for the update Beach Runner and an excellent update. Keep up the Kms!
aTarom (2024-01-22 08:20:15+00:00): Hola gràcies per editar, si us plau revisa aquesta edició, les escales del Passatge Ametllers per sobre de l'edifici? No t'ha saltat cap warning a JOSM?
Salutacions
pswsm (2024-01-22 09:30:11+00:00): No em vaig fixar i el warning segurament saltes però el vaig ignorar.
A migdia quan fagi la parada per dinar ho arreglo
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-21 02:10:14+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1226124513

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
MxxCon (2024-01-21 07:49:15+00:00): Shouldn't it rather be tagged as https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing:island instead of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Atraffic_calming%3Disland?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146499130
akadouri (2024-01-21 17:08:40+00:00): crossing:island (https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1Ggf) is more typically the tag used on the crossing way or node (though I see it is used a lot on areas as well in the taginfo stats...)

The areas are more commonly tagged as traffic_calming=island (https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1Gga)

area:highway=traffic_island https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Street_area#traffic_island is also used a few spots... (https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1Ggi)
arjunaraoc (2024-01-23 01:55:03+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).

Check my improvement : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146575005
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146499156
LordGarySugar (2024-01-21 03:42:04+00:00): +source is also survey and local knowledge
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-07 15:34:48+00:00): Hello!

You used
crossing:markings=no2
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11535871219/history

Have you maybe meant
crossing:markings=no
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?
emersonveenstra (2024-01-25 12:45:02+00:00): Hello,

natural=wood is not meant to be used to cover a single tree, you need to use a natural=tree node for that. Below is a list of all the ways you have done that, please fix them all and then do not do this in the future, thanks!

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1241549003
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1242414691
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1241549006
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1242414687
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1242414549
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1242414681
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1231176634
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1231176635
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1231176638
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1231176636
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1233222918
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1233222915
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1233222901
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1233222904
nevw (2024-01-22 10:05:23+00:00): Hi Joris
There appears to be agreement that centreline waterways are preferred to extended through waterbodies now. 
See this recent discussion…
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/should-river-lines-be-mapped-through-lakes-estuaries-gulfs-and-other-large-water-bodies/104438
This has not been the practice in the past and there is still a variety of views.
MxxCon (2024-02-04 05:35:41+00:00): Hello.
Please note, you can not create multiple peaks with exactly the same name.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146500032
elsy1 (2024-01-22 06:02:05+00:00): درود این تغییر نام خیابان که شما دادید اشتباه و خرابکاری محسوب میشود.
Joseph R P (2024-01-26 01:49:25+00:00): Hello, please do not downgrade trunk roads to primary based whether or not it is access controlled or how many lanes it has. The definition of a trunk route in the US has shifted from controlled-access or high speed roads to simply major highways that connect significant towns and cities as well as other important highways like these. If a road is controlled access, the expressway=yes tag can be added to it to indicate so.
SamTheEditor49 (2024-01-26 20:00:38+00:00): My apologies, it would appear I misread the documentation for trunk roads on OpenStreetMap. I originally found an older guideline that suggested this road should not be a trunk road, but the current documentation clearly does allow for this kind of road to be a trunk road. I've updated the roadways back to trunk roads in changeset: 146723257, but these changesets can also be reverted if necessary, they do not contain any other important changes.
Joseph R P (2024-01-27 02:41:49+00:00): No worries, thank you for response and reverts. Happy mapping!
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-26 11:03:28+00:00): Czemu https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1241558821 to highhway=cycleway ?

Są tam odpowiednie znaki drogowe?
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-04 18:32:10+00:00): name=Carsa
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11536081965

shop=electrodomésticos ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop or https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Tag_descriptions_for_key_%22shop%22 fitting? Maybe new value needs to be invented? Maybe this data is wrong and there is no shop here? Maybe it is not a shop but something else?
Cards for people virmwi8rj6 (2024-01-21 07:34:11+00:00): OK Johann du bist nicht https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/mfbehrens99
woodpeck_repair (2024-01-22 08:49:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 146542773 where the changeset comment is: revert edits von Sockenpuppe
eggie (2024-01-21 10:22:19+00:00): Dag Geo  
access=no icm andere accesstags is bijna altijd fout.
Welk bord staat er nog meer?


MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-01-21 10:27:38+00:00): Een bollard houdt per default motorvoertuigen tegen.
Rood Wit is geen valide tag.
In de wiki kun je opzoeken hoe iets te taggen.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Tag:barrier%3Dbollard
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-01-21 10:33:14+00:00): Ik heb wat aangepast  Het zal niet routeren voor motorvoertuigen tussen de paaltjes.
cyclist789 (2025-09-11 17:29:08+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1241566404

Man skal *enten* markere den ene bane some tunnel *eller* den anden som bro. Ikke begge dele.

Ifølge:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bridge?uselang=en-GB
bxl-forever (2024-01-21 11:22:45+00:00): Hello,

It looks like you have been adding new woods here.  That is fine but please make sure to write meaningful changeset titles that accurately describe what you are really doing on the map.

mdsqfj, qskjmfd, sqfkjml, sqdf, qskjmfd, jljk, kfmjqs and all the other random text strings do not reflect very well on your reputation on the map.  I fear that sooner or later somebody will request your account to be banned because you are obfuscating your actions.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Hope this helps.  Have a nice day.
silversurfer83 (2024-01-21 13:58:33+00:00): Gude :)

kleiner Hinweis, weil die Metadaten dieser Änderung sagen, dass du mit Esri gearbeitet hast:
In Hessen gibt es sehr gut ausgerichtete 20cm Orthophotos. Nutze diese bitte für die Arbeit mit Luftbildern, da sie so ziemlich die besten Bilder sind, die wir in Hessen zu verfügung haben.

cheers
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146503429
Andre68 (2024-01-22 20:32:44+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis! Werde ich in Zukunft berücksichtigen!
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-07 15:37:59+00:00): Hello!

You used
incline=down2
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/785930604/history

Have you maybe meant
incline=down
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?
ffff23 (2024-03-12 06:47:07+00:00): Hello!

It was a typo so I fixed.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148534256
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-12 15:08:26+00:00): Thanks for a fix!
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-21 09:00:26+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11536315191

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
mp747474 (2024-01-25 08:29:46+00:00): Hallo, entschuldige dass ich dir da so "reingegrätscht" bin, aber ich bin der Meinung, dass Kelkheim mit place-node auf der Karte erscheinen darf. Die drei "Kernstadtteile" sind schon seit 1938 zusammengeschlossen (also nicht erst seit der letzten Gemeindegebietsreform) und bilden heute ein zusammenhängendes Stadtgebiet und sind nicht mehr als getrennte Siedlungen zu erkennen. Das ist also ein ähnlicher Fall wie bei viel größeren Städten wie Frankfurt und Mainz, die nun mal unter dem Namen bekannt sind und nicht unter dem Namen ihrer Stadtteile. Deshalb habe ich den place-node an seinem ursprünglichen Ort wiederhergestellt, denn die Leute suchen in der Regel nach Kelkheim und nicht nach "Kelkheim-Mitte", genau wie niemand, der nach Frankfurt will, den Begriff "Altstadt" in die Suche eingibt.
surveyor54 (2024-01-25 09:56:22+00:00): Ist, OK.
Da gibt es so viele verschiedene Meinungen und es wurde auch schon so viel im Forum darüber diskutiert. 🤔
Der Nächste ändert es wieder.
NeisBot (2024-01-21 09:31:03+00:00): Hello SG Boyz, thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.

Thanks!

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
stasiu512 (2024-11-24 17:51:17+00:00): Cześć, czy tutaj dalej występuje ruch jednokierunbkowy? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1241584884
theDM (2024-11-24 19:35:58+00:00): Cześć, musiałbym się przejechać tam, ale jak byłem tam około miesiąca temu, to był jednokierunkowy.
stasiu512 (2024-11-24 19:41:04+00:00): Rozumiem, w takim razie wszystko w porządku, myślałem że to resztka pozostała po remoncie Jaśkowej Doliny który się zakończył.
theDM (2024-11-24 19:43:16+00:00): W czasie remontu Jaśkowej był jednokierunkowy w przeciwną stronę. Po tym remoncie na Migowskiej nastawiali szykan i na tym krótkim odcinku zrobili jednokierunkowy w stronę Wileńskiej.
dzamper (2024-01-26 09:48:06+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2671476809

Jakie „Zmiany w Chorzowie” wymagają przyklejenia barierki w Zabrzu do ulicy 300 metrów dalej? :/
woodpeck (2024-01-22 09:25:31+00:00): Hallo Ryblix, schaust Du Dir das Tagging von https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/70422425 nochmal an ("bicycle=s") - da stimmt offenbar was nicht, aber ich weiss nicht, was Du erreichen wolltest, weil Du im Kommentar nur "verbessert" geschrieben hast...
BCNorwich (2024-01-22 08:10:18+00:00): Hi, I've removed your fictional motorways and wetlands. 

Your buildings would look better if they were squared up.
BCNorwich (2024-01-22 08:16:12+00:00): Fictional motorways removed.
BCNorwich (2024-01-21 12:48:02+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Can you please say why you've removed these footpaths? They are in the most part visible in available imagery.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2024-01-28 09:08:50+00:00): No response so I've reinstated them.
aTarom (2024-01-21 13:47:24+00:00): Hola Jesús, gracias por editar, me puedes ayudar con esta nuevo valor de elevación
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/576800111/history
Según el IGN tanto en el ráster como en el MDT5 dan un valor de unos ~938 metros aprox. quizás quisiste poner 931 en vez de 981?

Saludos
Jesús Gómez (2024-01-21 19:00:19+00:00): Hola aTarom. En el mapa había dos elementos duplicados para el mismo pico pero con elevaciones diferentes: 942 y 981metros. Eliminé uno de ellos y dejé los 981 metros pero veo que también son erróneos.
En cuanto pueda lo corrijo por los 938 del MDT del IGN.
¡Gracias por el aviso!
BCNorwich (2024-01-22 08:20:14+00:00): Fiction removed.
fortera_au (2024-01-21 10:57:47+00:00): Hi, is there a reason why you've removed the track there?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146507142
Harvesterify (2024-01-22 16:00:25+00:00): Hello,

Are you sure that the locality tag is adequate, since the ways to access the beach are already tagged with the same name ? This doesn't seems to fit the description of the tag : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dlocality
A67-A67 (2024-01-22 18:34:30+00:00): Yes place=locality is a 'rest' tag for places that don't fit the other categories. This is the case for strandslagen.

The path names could be the same as the name of the strandslag, but they may be different and sometimes they have been tagged incorrectly with the name of the strandslag instead of the name of the path.
Harvesterify (2024-01-23 15:18:17+00:00): It doesn't seems to fit the description of the wiki though, but maybe I'm not understanding what you are trying to tag, conceptually. What is the difference between strandslagen, strandafrit and strandslag ? 

From what I understand, it represents the "beach entrance", so the access way to the beach, is that correct ? If so, I don't really get what is the semantic difference between the existing higway line leading to the beach, and the node you added
A67-A67 (2024-01-23 17:37:58+00:00): Strandafrit, strandopgang and strandslag are synonyms. Strandslagen is the plural form of strandslag.

Beach entrance is a loose translation to English. It then represents the entrance / 'cutting' through the dunes itself, not the path. So according to the One feature, one OSM element principle of OSM it should be tagged separately. 

Municipalities sometimes name the paths after the strandslagen, but they could also be entirely different. In the case of Katwijk, I'm not really sure whether the name-tag on the paths is correct. They may be part of the road Boulevard or Boulevard Zeezijde.
NieWnen (2024-01-21 12:08:57+00:00): To nie jest park, nie bez powodu to zmieniałem.

Nie ma tu ani alejek, ani ławek.
confusedbuffalo (2024-01-21 11:01:57+00:00): Should read "Add unit to maxspeed"
Frans S (2024-01-21 17:18:41+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. However ,not all buildings are squared.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146508145
Dimitar155 (2024-01-24 13:32:51+00:00): Hi Maarten,

Just letting you know that brand:wikipedia is not being added by NSI (Name Suggestion Index) since almost two years (https://github.com/osmlab/name-suggestion-index/issues/6481). Also, amenity:wikipedia is a tag that seems to be redundant since you can get the Wikipedia article from brand:wikidata. In case you want a human-readable link, you can check out https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/osm-human-readable-wikidata/ (it's also available for Chrome).

Happy mapping,
Dimitar
VLD549 (2024-03-26 10:05:38+00:00): Hi, could you communicate in English and explain where the name change from Donkerhoek to Donkerhoek Airstrip comes from?
I can't find the right source.
Thank you.
TrickyFoxy (2024-12-30 18:55:10+00:00): Водосточная труба? https://osm.org/node/11536629369
SomeoneElse (2024-01-21 12:22:14+00:00): Also ts0608b, ts0617b
NeisBot (2024-01-22 00:31:05+00:00): Hi beautifulplaces Sockenpuppe Nr 144 👋

your recent changeset has been marked due to a temporary or permanent block from further map edits. 

If you have any questions or if there's anything you'd like to discuss regarding the mapping, feel free to reach out! 

Best regards, 🤖

Details https://osm.org/user_blocks/15598
#ContributorHasBeenBlocked
Waldamsel (2024-01-21 14:16:03+00:00): Hallo dar3,
warum hast Du "Waldlehrpfad" für beide Wegabschnitte erneut als Eigenname eingetragen ? Die Begründung, warum ich den Namen gelöscht habe, war in meinem   Änderungssatz genannt. Leider hast Du keine Datenquelle für Deine Eintragung benannt. Auch die von Dir verwendete Hintergrundkarte "NRW Liegenschaftskataster" zeigt diesen Namen nicht an. Bitte benenne Deine Datenquelle oder nehme Deine Änderung zurück. 
Im Zweifelsfall ist eine vorherige Kontaktaufnahme sinnvoller, als voreilig Bearbeitungen mit für andere nicht erkennbaren Gründen rückgängig zu machen.
Danke und viele Grüße,
Wallamsel
MichS (2024-01-22 10:55:47+00:00): Hallo. Falls auf dem Weg ein markierter Wanderweg liegt, dann eine Wanderwegrelation erstellen, falls nicht, den Namen löschen.

MFG
M
Waldamsel (2024-01-27 17:19:38+00:00): Mit Änderungssatz: 146752518 zurückgebaut und Eigenname "Waldlehrpfad" entfernt.
habi (2024-01-23 19:32:59+00:00): Ciao MappSurfer

Der Parking-Zufahrt https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1241628071/ und allen Dingen darum, die im Untergrund liegen, müsstest du ein `layer=-1` verpassen, damit die Dinge auch datentechnisch im Untergrund sind.
Ansonsten, werden v.a. die Gebäude überlappend mit den Gebäuden ob der Erde gerendert.

Kannst du das noch nachholen?

Gruss,
habi
Robert Whittaker (2024-08-18 22:20:07+00:00): Hi stsquad. In this changeset, you added a convenience store with the name "Morrisons Fault". I've not come across this name before. Is this store here perhaps a "Morrisons Daily" instead?
ZeLonewolf (2024-01-21 13:19:47+00:00): Thanks!
rhtb0 (2024-01-21 14:52:12+00:00): https://tiles.osm.kr/#18/37.57500/126.97700
오픈스트리트맵 한국에서는 군부대가 노출되지 않는 지도를 공개하고 있습니다.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-21 14:00:24+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8339135444
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/897182624

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
GerdP (2024-07-07 14:21:05+00:00): Moin aus Wildeshausen!
Du hast an ein paar Stellen Verkehrsschilder erfasst, z.B. hier:
https://www.osm.org/node/11536820434
Das ist okay, aber wichtiger wäre es, die Bedeutung der Schilder an den entsprechenden Straßen zu erfassen. 
Also z.B. maxweight=5 
Sonst wird das kein Router auswerten können. Der Knoten mit traffic_sign=* ist eher für uns Mapper.