piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Senihtu (2026-05-07 14:23:20+00:00): Mir ist vor allem aufgefallen, daß ein Teil der B14 im route_master gelandet war.
Wenn der Bus derzeit baustellenbedingt einen anderen Weg fährt, dann könnte man das eintragen.
So etwas überlasse ich aber lokalen Mappern bzw. mache ich nur da, wo ich den Bus wirklich fahren sehe. 
Ich bin viel zu weit weg um mitzubekommen wann diese Baustelle fertig ist (und sich der Linienweg wieder ändert). 
Gruß
MattGPS (2026-05-07 23:41:17+00:00): Durch Bauarbeiten und Sperrungen wird vieles in OSM ungültig. Es ergibt keinen Sinn alle Zwischenzustände abbilden zu wollen. Und wie gesagt: der Bus fährt laut Fahrplan nur Haltestellen an. OSM betreibt "Theoriefindung" wenn eine Strecke eingetragen wird.
pwbriggs (2026-05-07 06:46:44+00:00): Thanks; we always appreciate people helping to make the data more accurate. Currently I don't see your business on here at all though—can you provide a brief description of what sort of business this is (car repair? Car seller??) and a link to a website if you have one? Then I can help out more.

Thanks for being awesome :)
Cars R Us Tacoma (2026-05-07 08:20:21+00:00): I wasn't sure how to add a business but it's www.carsrustacoma.com and I am a car dealership. We also offer aftermarket parts and OEM repair parts. Tinting, wheels and all sorts of modifications!
Glassman (2026-05-07 15:51:27+00:00): I added a node for the used car dealership. according to Piece County GIS. The address is located at the north end of the area, not in the building  with 7409 and 7413 addresses. 

also added website, but was unable to pull any schema.org data.
MxxCon (2026-05-08 03:31:50+00:00): Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you delete network=US:NY tag?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182316622
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-05-08 04:00:14+00:00): From what I read on Wikipedia, the JFK Expressway is not a state highway, like NY 878. In fact, from my research, it doesn't even have a "reference" number, so I don't think the JFK Expressway should have the tag "network=US:NY".
felipeeugenio (2026-05-07 17:34:43+00:00): Hola. Es como que metió una relación dentro de otra, o no?
Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182316838
Glassman (2026-05-07 15:59:50+00:00): I'm not sure, but it looks like you duplicated the existing cycleway. NE 40th Street is already tagged for bikes. Please review your edits to make sure you didn't duplicate existing tagged ways.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182317197
roy-rishi (2026-05-07 16:24:38+00:00): Hello – thanks for your feedback. I may not have understood how OSM denotes bike facilities. Upon reading the wikis on the relevant tags, I notice that Eastlake Ave NE (over University Bridge) has tags cycleway=separate, with 2 additional ways in blue denoting bike lane. I now see that NE 40th St has the cycleway:left=track tag, so I agree that I have duplicated the bicycle facilities of this road.
If I may ask: When is it appropriate to tag a cycleway on the road it follows without drawing a separate way, and when is it better to use the cycleway:separate tag and draw in the additional way(s)? And, in this instance, would you suggest fixing this duplication by tagging NE 40th St with cycleway=separate, or by removing the highway=cycleway way that I added? Thanks!
pwbriggs (2026-05-07 18:03:58+00:00): To be honest, it gets pretty subjective. The convention is typically that we tend not to map things separately if they aren't physically separated (by a curb, wall, etc.). But as you point out, the University Bridge is one example that goes against this convention.

I'd say, for cycle paths, you could map it separately if you want; just make sure you update cycleway:both=separate (or cycleway:left, cycleway:right). (I wouldn't use plain cycleway=* at all anymore, because it makes it less clear whether the tag refers to both sides of the road or just one.)

Thanks! Let me know if you have more questions—always happy to help where I can.
roy-rishi (2026-05-07 21:41:13+00:00): Hello again!

I think it makes sense to separate the cycleway from the street. Here’s my reasoning:
- Allows us to denote separation:right=kerb
  - Prior to 2022 and the Even Better Bike Lanes project, this cycleway was only separated by paint. Now that it has precast curbs running its length, I feel distinguishing this is valuable.

Feel free to suggest a different solution – I’m glad the OSM community is able to have productive discussions, and I look forward to learning more.

I made the changes to de-duplicate this cycleway from the NE 40th St tags. It looks like it went to a new changeset.
pwbriggs (2026-05-08 05:23:30+00:00): > I think it makes sense to separate the cycleway from the street

Sounds good, I'd say go ahead.

> OSM community

I don't remember if I linked you to it already, but the OpenStreetMap US Slack workspace is super useful for asking questions about tagging, and learning about mapping-related events and making connections. I highly recommend: https://slack.openstreetmap.us/

> looks like it went to a new changeset

Yes, for most editing programs, 1 upload = 1 changeset. It's rare to see an open changeset: usually it only happens if you catch it in the middle of an upload or editing session. Once a changeset closes you can add comments like these. But those are all technical details that you don't really need to keep track of; the vast majority of the time it's transparent to users
roy-rishi (2026-05-08 06:11:56+00:00): Thanks for the resources and info.!
BerryTrails (2026-05-07 10:38:37+00:00): Hey parmacanal you did great today! I noticed the change you made — keep up the good work , Happy mapping
ParmaCanal (2026-05-07 15:34:26+00:00): Thank you, I truly appreciate hearing that! Happy Mapping!
pwbriggs (2026-05-07 18:34:52+00:00): Thanks. I think the description=* tags are redundant here because it adds no information that isn't already mapped.
roy-rishi (2026-05-07 22:27:18+00:00): Makes sense! Removed.
pwbriggs (2026-05-07 18:23:44+00:00): You mapped this such that the gate is blocking not only 4th Avenue, but the sidewalk as well. I assume that's not what you intended, so I'll move the gate to be blocking 4th Ave only. Thanks!
mtngeoff (2026-05-07 22:47:40+00:00): You are correct-thanks. From conversation with workers on-site, fence will probably be removed by July 2026. Also, they said there is a plan to connect 2nd Ave. to 3rd Ave. just to the south. So this will change again.
pwbriggs (2026-05-08 03:50:20+00:00): Cool, good to know. Construction is painful, I feel for the residents :)
dmjab13 (2026-05-07 13:27:52+00:00): looks good man, doing all the buildings tires me out lol
Tex2002ans (2026-05-08 03:33:04+00:00): Thanks. :)

And if you use the "Lehigh_County_PA_Buildings" dataset, things are a bit easier and faster.

See my 2 posts on the OSM Forums:

- "Editors adding buildings through AI tools?" (2025)
--- https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/editors-adding-buildings-through-ai-tools/127720/20
- "How to keep track of AI building outlines corrected (tag?)" (2025)
--- https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/how-to-keep-track-of-ai-building-outlines-corrected-tag/130714/6

Then it boils down to:

- ~50% = Verify + Hit "Accept"
- 25% = Drag to correct spot / Add-or-Delete 2->6ish nodes.
- 25% = Complete ignore
--- Then manually draw like normal.

So, it shaves off about 75% of the drudgery. :)

I was DREADING making my way deeper into Allentown/Bethlehem, but with the higher-quality buildings, I don't mind chipping away now. :)
Digitaleo (2026-05-11 13:47:21+00:00): Bonjour, je ne comprends pas pourquoi le nœud https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/437211313 a été supprimé.

Merci d'avance
Jojolaglandouille (2026-05-15 16:25:35+00:00): J'ai copié collé les informations du noeud pour les associer au bâtiment, vu qu'il ne contient que le vétérinaire. Cela permet d'avoir l'adresse, le bâtiment, et l'activité d'associés.
MappingMore (2026-05-10 13:56:15+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:182468010
rwblake (2026-05-10 23:54:49+00:00): Hello. I'm concerned that many of the buildings you have added here are imprecise outlines and are poorly aligned to the shape of the buildings. Additionally, the buildings haven't been split so will be difficult to assign addresses to. Please be cautious using AI to map in OSM. Quality over quantity! An AI map is already available from Overture.
Maksrambe (2026-05-14 12:14:23+00:00): I was making a rough map for surveying and editing later(my phone gps is bad so I need some features to map addresses accurately), but I won't be surveying here for a while so I've remapped the mistakes I've noticed. Mapping terraced or semidetached houses separately is optional as far as I know, and I would prefer to make finer edits after surveying addresses instead of relying on guesswork and satellite imagery.
But I agree and I will be slower and more careful from now on.
rwblake (2026-05-14 22:11:39+00:00): Thank you for the reply.  I find it more difficult to correct a misdrawn building when it already has address info attached. I thought I'd read that adding non-split buildings wasn't recommended but I can't actually find evidence for that, sorry! Thank you for updating mistakes you've seen and for agreeing to be more careful. I don't want to stop your mapping progress because it is really helpful.
dpolovinkin (2026-05-27 01:16:43+00:00): you leave "微修正" comment of every change you do, please don't to that and leave meaningful comments wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
pwbriggs (2026-05-07 17:49:43+00:00): This looks good, thanks! The only thing I'm not sure about is informal=yes. Is this really a non-official ramp (did somebody pour it without official approval—guerilla street design!?)

The other thing is that this is probably more appropriately mapped as a highway=footway or highway=cycleway like the neighboring main paths it connects to. I updated that.

Thanks again for your contributions and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
roy-rishi (2026-05-07 21:08:11+00:00): That's a good question; I'm not sure if this is some form of guerilla street work.  I can't find official (or non-official) documentation on this. Perhaps it was poured when Seattle City Light closed the Burke-Gilman in 2014 and offered a detour on NE 40th St (source: Seattle Bike Blog)? Still, that would not indicate whether this was officially constructed.

Thanks for updating the highway=* tag, that makes sense!
pwbriggs (2026-05-08 05:24:47+00:00): Cool, thanks. Probably OK to leave as-is then.
World_Winner (2026-05-11 04:53:44+00:00): Reverted in changeset id: 182493040
LordGarySugar (2026-05-09 18:11:16+00:00): Thanks for making some changes here, unfortunately there were some errors that I had to correct. For example, you changed the trunk road to a service road, which should only be used for very minor access roads. You also added ford=yes to a path, which should only be used on paths that ford a river. I would recommend starting out with some simpler edits before moving on to complex changes like you have done here. If you have any questions or need any help, feel free to ask.
a hobbs (2026-05-09 18:50:15+00:00): Sorry about the mistakes still learning. Thanks for fixing them.
danieldegroot2 (2026-05-10 16:55:35+00:00): Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap!

Find the beginners' guide here
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide

The relevant section for aerial imagery is here
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pick_your_mapping_technique#Aerial_Imagery

Only east(right) of the river Barrow is Bing aerial imagery of good date and quality.
In this area, you should use the regular Esri aerial imagery for alignment.
Inside of Kilkenny ring road roughly, mostly Esri Clarity is used for alignment (but it is old, 2011!).
You can try aligning with existing geometry, though not all may be properly aligned as it was mapped in the previous decade when imagery was less available to OSM.
Keep in mind if you continue mapping you may need different offsets or no offset at all. You can also not easily save offsets between sessions.
Once you are comfortable with iD, you could switch to JOSM for more advanced editing features.

For questions or discussion, see
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Join_the_community#Communication

Contributors can comment on each others changesets to verify or request changes.
I would appreciate if you could reply to this message, please :-)

Happy mapping

Regards,

Daniel
amprex575 (2026-05-11 03:55:00+00:00): Thanks so much for the info! I've made a number of similar edits in the US and Canada but this is one of the first I've done in Ireland. I will look into the guides as well as JOSM!
mavl (2026-05-08 13:39:17+00:00): Здравствуйте. Подскажите, откуда здесь подземная дорога?  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1510171939
World_Winner (2026-05-10 09:55:24+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: 182458113
cubbe8 (2026-05-07 03:30:26+00:00): Also I 95 on the GWB was named as “Bergen Boulevard” under this changeset
felipeeugenio (2026-05-07 12:12:46+00:00): Hola. Gracias por sus ediciones. Esto es un proyecto en Inglés. Los colores deben sacarse de la paleta disponibl (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:colour)


saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182320223
Glassman (2026-05-07 16:01:54+00:00): #TIP: it is recommend to leave an address node when deleting a building. The address can be reused for future construction.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182320249
stosh77 (2026-05-18 23:57:35+00:00): I have corrected the details.
stosh77 (2026-05-17 03:34:03+00:00): I have corrected the details.
stosh77 (2026-05-16 20:57:42+00:00): I have corrected the details.
anysse54 (2026-05-07 20:18:04+00:00): https://pksszczecin.kiedyprzyjedzie.pl/#/stops/1141917:1195824/departures
rajdhani (2026-05-11 04:38:55+00:00): Hi anysse54

Thank you for reaching out.
I updated the name tag as per OSM specification and name guidelines, where this specific tag was updated.

I appreciate your feedback and will continue to keep quality and community standards in mind for my future edits.

Thank you.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-15 09:43:54+00:00): Reverted adding SEO POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags, possibly sourced from Google Maps, in changeset 184128345

https://osm.org/changeset/184128345
felipeeugenio (2026-05-07 12:14:54+00:00): Hola. No hacemos dibujos esquemáticos. No es tan facil como llegar y montar un polígono de este tamaño. Voy a intentar arreglarlo.


saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182320806
tueriwan (2026-05-07 15:25:59+00:00): Bueno!, gracias solo lo añadí disculpa :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182320806
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-02 08:29:24+00:00): Reverted SEO spam adding POI possibly sourced from Google Maps per tags and apparent vandalism, with blatantly promotional and nonsensical tagging, in changeset 183534285

https://osm.org/changeset/183534285
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-15 10:34:44+00:00): Cleaned up remaining SEO spam and other tagging for POI in changeset 184130362

https://osm.org/changeset/184130362
habi (2026-05-07 08:27:09+00:00): Das Kirchhoferhaus hat die Hausnummer 14, beide Vereinigungen geben die Hausnummer 50 an, stimmt das trotzdem so?
SaintCityMapper (2026-05-07 09:14:36+00:00): Ja, die Postadresse ist neu bei beiden Dufourstrasse 50 (genauso wie jene der Universität an sich). Würdest du es anders erfassen?
habi (2026-05-07 09:37:39+00:00): Die Postadresse ist in dem Fall unterschiedlich von der geographischen Lokalisation? Wenn das so ist, würde ich das genau so erfassen, also Lage bei addr:hn=15 und postalisch korrekte `addr`-Tags auf dem Node. Also so wie jetzt :)
SaintCityMapper (2026-05-07 10:10:18+00:00): Ja, und entsprechend top :-)
TrickyFoxy (2026-07-01 10:12:55+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184905396
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-07 11:17:59+00:00): Reverted outrageous SEO spam-dalism of a variety of features around a nonsense-tagged SEO POI in changeset 183775396

https://osm.org/changeset/183775396
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-07 11:18:25+00:00): Reverted outrageous SEO spam-dalism of a variety of features around a nonsense-tagged SEO POI in changeset 183775396

https://osm.org/changeset/183775396
fortera_au (2026-05-08 01:27:12+00:00): Hi, what is the source for the name, is this visible on the side of the building at all?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182324069
josh145 (2026-05-09 07:38:22+00:00): I have seen it open. No name just a shipping container full of bitcoin miners using the power instead of feeding the power to the grid. About 300 miners using about 1.5kw each
fortera_au (2026-05-09 07:42:07+00:00): If there's no name on it, then there should be no name tag in OSM.
Taya_S (2026-05-07 09:06:03+00:00): Reverted vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182328519
qstep (2026-05-07 12:55:55+00:00): Szia. A wiki leírás alapján ez nem highway=residential:

>Roads carrying primarily through traffic, or non-residential traffic, should be tagged with a different highway tag (e.g. unclassified, tertiary) as appropriate

Kérlek, vond vissza ezeket a módosításokat!
qstep (2026-05-08 13:26:25+00:00): Javítottam: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182382481#map=16/47.67785/19.66309&layers=N

A magyar wikiben részleteztük ezeket az értékeket: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hungary/F%C5%91%C3%BAt#highway_c%C3%ADmke_%C3%A9rt%C3%A9kei
infeeeee (2026-05-07 07:55:33+00:00): Hát ezzel csak rontottál a helyzeten, mert nem ugyanazt az utat állítottad vissza, hanem egy másikat raktál a helyére, ezzel elrontva 32 buszjárat kapcsolatát... Mindegy, javítom.
Wildsharky (2026-05-12 11:09:21+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:182492861
Adikso (2026-05-07 18:40:14+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182352395 Połączyłem części budynku w jedno. Sposób w jaki zmapowałeś powoduje że są jakby 4 miejsca o tej samej nazwie co negatywnie wpływa na wyniki wyszukiwania. Poprawiłem.
Bienson (2026-05-08 04:05:02+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1510198531

Bitte korrigieren
hfs (2026-05-12 06:52:42+00:00): REWE in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1510198531 sieht falsch aus. Den gibt es nebenan schon in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4289636 .
Wildsharky (2026-05-12 11:10:00+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:182375985
Fraxi (2026-05-07 10:29:57+00:00): Hi
you drew https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1510199681 over https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/988040302. The same with the buildings on SE. Please, fix it. 
Do you use more contemporary and better image sources such as MAF Orthophoto?
Ewen Hill (2026-06-19 10:40:41+00:00): Great work on rendering the Hands off Beaumont. It comes up better than the actual art work. I give it 4.5 Banksys!
❤️‍🔥 (2026-06-21 02:33:16+00:00): haha cheers, i discovered man_made=geoglyph recently and they’re quite fun to map 😆
eggie (2026-05-07 08:02:12+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
NorthCrab_upload (2026-05-07 07:51:42+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2607300959
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1132693879

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Satchit P@ (2026-05-21 10:33:56+00:00): Hi, I added some new trail/path edits in OpenStreetMap around 14–15 days ago using the web editor. I can see the changes in my changesets/history on the OSM website, but I still don’t see those trails appearing in the OSM app/map layer

Could someone help me understand:

whether the edits are correctly saved,
how long trail/path rendering usually takes,
and whether some apps/layers cache or delay OSM updates?

Thanks.
eggie (2026-05-07 08:05:28+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback...  organic is geen ideale app om adressen toe te voegen. Ik heb de info samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
mueschel (2026-05-12 13:10:09+00:00): Hallo,
welche Stecker gibt es hier? "type4" gibt es nicht, und "type1" und "type3" sind äußerst unwahrscheinlich.
highbuilder (2026-05-17 19:33:40+00:00): ah, dann war es vorher auch schon falsch getaggt, ich dachte da sei die Nummer der Anschlüsse gemeint.
Es sind 2x CCS mit 205kW
sowie 2x Typ2 mit 22kW
YraFyra (2026-05-23 07:09:14+00:00): Hej
Jag anser att det är lämpligt att info om kommande öppning finns med i namnet eftersom startdate sällan visas eller respekteras i kartappar (utan nog är mer som tänkt historisk info)
Jag tänker så här: Du letar efter en Ica och hittar denna, men den har inte ens öppnat. Att ens lägga in affärer som inte öppnat kan också diskuteras eftersom OSM ska visa vad som finns i verkligheten.
Nadja15 (2026-05-23 12:55:27+00:00): Det kändes bara fel att ha beskrivande text i namnet, det såg konstigt ut i Organic Maps. Det finns ju också "proposed:" prefixet, då dyker de inte upp alls, men är ändå med i kartdatan. Kanske mest korrekt egentligen. Det finns ju också "opening_hour=closed", vilket appar nog respekterar. Där går det nog dessutom att sätta start date också, dvs "stängt till och med detta datum". Men du kan också reverta min ändring om du tycker det.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-16 11:03:32+00:00): Reverted adding SEO POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags, likely sourced from Google Maps, in changeset 184176071

https://osm.org/changeset/184176071
IvanaŠokčević (2026-05-14 14:27:34+00:00): Changed tag from maxweightrating:hgv to maxweight:hgv later based on street signs, fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182634204 #OptimoRoute
IvanaŠokčević (2026-05-14 14:28:04+00:00): Changed tag from maxweightrating:hgv to maxweight:hgv later based on street signs, fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182634296 #OptimoRoute
IvanaŠokčević (2026-05-14 14:28:29+00:00): Changed tag from maxweightrating:hgv to maxweight:hgv later based on street signs, fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182634429 #OptimoRoute
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-15 10:37:40+00:00): Cleaned up remaining SEO spam and other tagging for POI in changeset 184130441 and changeset 184130491

https://osm.org/changeset/184130441 

https://osm.org/changeset/184130491
IvanaŠokčević (2026-05-14 14:28:59+00:00): Changed tag from maxweightrating:hgv to maxweight:hgv later based on street signs, fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182634509 #OptimoRoute
sandraev (2026-05-07 13:23:20+00:00): Hello. I saw you recently made a few changes on the DTU campus. I disagree with the removal of the emergency exit from building 306; could you elaborate on why you decided to remove it? You also removed the bridge tagging from a path in 101's courtyard; could you explain why you made that change? If you are around campus, I am open to collaborating on a better map of the university.
sandraev (2026-05-07 13:31:28+00:00): Also, please try to add more descriptive information about your changesets. "Opdateret af DTU Campus Service" is far from explicit.
sandraev (2026-05-07 13:32:02+00:00): I reverted your changes for now. Please contact me for further discussion.
jlindhart (2026-05-08 08:47:26+00:00): Hi. I work in DTU Campus Service and are responsible for our GIS systems and data outside our buildings. 

I am on campus and it's a good idea to collaborate. My email is jolind@dtu.dk

BR 
Jonas