piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Aim311_ (2026-07-08 12:25:12+00:00): Są rożnice w przeznaczeniu dróg. 
Wspomniana droga "która jest po lewej stronie Grodziskiej" to skrót którym można dojechac do Bukowskiej w Stęszewie. Całkiem sporo aut korzyta z tego skrótu o czym wydaje się nie wiesz.

Natomiast droga przy torach którą niewłaściwie podniosłeś to typowa droga serwisowa i gdyby nie ruch rekreacyjny (rolki, rowery) to jej jedynym przeznaczeniem byłby dojazd do pól to byłby asfaltowy tack, a tak żeby ułatwić dojazd w celach rekreacyjnych "turytstom" jest oznaczona jako serwisowa.
grzegorz75jan (2026-07-08 12:45:17+00:00): Przecież ta droga https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/813132115 zresztą nie potrzebnie pocięta na kawałki to  droga polna tylko że asfaltowa. Maks na co bym się zgodził to service a i to po ciężkich walkach a nie unclassified.

W odnośniku który podałeś jako przykład jest jakiś błąd ponieważ nie pokazuje mi drogi tylko fragment mapy ale prawdopodobnie miałeś na myśli tą https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/524712188
I na mocno upartego mogła by być unclassified ale bardziej service i to po ciężkich walkach.

Tu w okolicy https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5105778034 poprzednik 
zmalował fikuśny zakręt a z fragmentu drogi polnej zrobił unclassified bo zobaczył kawałek asfaltu. Nadziabane nadmiarowych węzłów w liniach.
grzegorz75jan (2026-07-08 12:55:07+00:00): Popatrzyłem jeszcze raz na https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/524712188 i service bez ciężkich walk ale unclassified średnio.
Mercanto123 (2026-07-08 13:02:00+00:00): Zgadzam się z Wami. Tam w pewnym momencie jest znak droga dla rowerów i dwa słupki i stąd jej pocięcie na 3 części, to samo na drugim jej końcu. Dziwne rozwiązanie, wykluczające ruch pieszych.
Marek-M (2026-07-08 13:50:32+00:00): Taki znak nie wyklucza pieszych, tylko daje pierwszeństwo rowerzystom nad pieszymi. Jeżeli pieszy nie ma innej drogi przeznaczonej do ruchu pieszego, to może przemieszczać się DDR ustępując pierwszeństwa rowerzystom.
Marek-M (2026-07-08 16:15:27+00:00): Przetagowałem tą drogę na dojazdówkę.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185352150
Marvk (2026-07-07 08:45:52+00:00): Hallo Flimmik,

sieht gut aus. Du könntest noch die Öffnungszeiten an Feiertagen ergänzen, also vermutlich "opening_hours=Mo-Fr 09:30-18:00; PH off" (An Feiertagen geschlossen)

Grüße
Marv
Flimmik (2026-07-07 09:33:15+00:00): Hallo Marv,

vielen Dank für dein Feedback! Das mache ich :).

BG,
Flimmik
eggie (2026-07-07 09:15:44+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
arjunaraoc (2026-07-08 06:55:01+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  Andhra Pradesh page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Andhra_Pradesh) and  join OSM Andhra Pradesh Telegram channel (https://t.me/osmandhra). This software requires that I review everything as either good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. 

Additional comments for resolving the issue: 
You have given the tag building for  a large area named Maruthi Nagar https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1536118124

Please see the Google AI help for representing a colony https://share.google/aimode/lnUJIBzTyspX6OGfT

If you can't resolve, please respond to the discussion on changset, so that another contributor can help fix it.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185251302
eggie (2026-07-07 09:15:01+00:00): Dag Justlnni

Beter geen lanes=1 gaan zetten op al die woonstraten.
oneway=no is default. Dat hoef je niet te taggen. 
MVG
eggie
JustInni (2026-07-07 21:01:15+00:00): Check! Danku, weer wat geleerd!
A67-A67 (2026-07-07 15:09:37+00:00): Adressen worden in Nederland op aparte punten geplaatst, niet op gebouwen. Voor Bergselaan 40 is dat deze https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9103990922
JustInni (2026-07-07 21:00:42+00:00): Veel dank! Nieuw hier en nu mijn beginnersbericht gelezen, ga ik eerst eventjes op induiken!
mueschel (2026-07-27 09:57:45+00:00): Hi,
what does 'donation:type = goods' mean? 'goods' can be more or less everything.
dcdanny (2026-07-27 11:14:18+00:00): Hi @mueschel
My understanding is you can donate almost any good quality items that can be reused. Birmingham city council describe what can be donated here: https://www.birmingham.gov.uk/info/50277/household_recycling_centres/2583/donate_your_unwanted_items 
Do you feel there's a better way to tag this?
mueschel (2026-07-27 11:58:27+00:00): The wiki already has a few examples of specifying what can be donated. I think we can just use existing terms and add them to these nodes:

furniture = yes
bicycle = yes
electronics = yes
bric_a_brac = yes (this tag isn't used, but exists in the form of 'recycling:bric_a_brac')

And I guess 
'household_items'
or 'garden_tools'
would be fine as well.

And just add url=... with the link for the detailed description
dcdanny (2026-07-27 12:32:21+00:00): @mueschel thats a good idea. Feel free to add those tags to the node if they're used in examples or can be found elsewhere
Trafford_Mapper (2026-07-07 09:26:42+00:00): This edit, and your other one on the tracks here is incorrect. The replacement buses aren't using the tram tracks. This is vandalism. 

What data and what service have you amended this for, as you shouldn't be changing OSM because a third party data source isn't marking things correctly
Trafford_Mapper (2026-07-07 09:41:11+00:00): Both edits reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185254444 - Vandalism
mkayeo (2026-07-07 13:12:52+00:00): Hi - the data is for TfGM. As I mentioned, tram replacement buses are currently represented as trams (using the tracks) for journey planning purposes - although this is under discussion. 
Normally it wouldn't be an issue, except for the Anchorage situation.
Anyway as mentioned, we have found an alternative workaround in the data, so won't need to make temporary edits to OSM for it again.

Thanks
Comino (2026-07-07 09:58:17+00:00): Hi,

How did you check about not accepting Bitcoin. According to DFX (https://dfx.swiss/) they do accept.
Froth (2026-07-07 10:31:31+00:00): Hi Comino,
I went there two times in the last two months. Both times they said they don't accept Bitcoin. Also there is no Bitcoin Accept sticker visible anywhere.
Comino (2026-07-07 10:35:37+00:00): Oke, thanks for the update.
I'll check with DFX why this is. Thanks again for keeping the map up-to-date!

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
BTC Map
eggie (2026-07-07 09:08:42+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback Het is onduidlijk wat je hebt gedaan in een groot gebied. 
Grens Lomm? 
Wat was je bedoeling?
Je commentaar is 'niets'.   Daar kunnen medemappers niet zo veel mee. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-07-07 09:10:27+00:00): Je hebt een administratieve grens ontdaan van relevante informatie. Waarom?

Ik draai je edits voorlopig weer even terug.
eggie (2026-07-07 09:12:48+00:00): reverted by changeset #185253249

Je eigen edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=185252516
Even de relatie laden.. dan zie je wat je hebt verwijderd.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-07 16:47:06+00:00): Note that SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap; please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more information.

Removed SEO spam text from name=* in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/185279675

Also, I see the location of the POI is in the middle of an empty lot. Can you explain this discrepancy?
iSumeri (2026-07-09 11:24:33+00:00): again! please stop making random changes, I am upodating the maps to fit navigations need.
iSumeri (2026-07-09 11:28:23+00:00): I am living in this city and every updates I make I have observed already! so please stop making changes from your end based on hashtages! understood?
little_maper (2026-07-12 08:37:31+00:00): Hello iSumeri again,
As I told you in the previous comment. Based on the OSM Policy, those streets whose classifications you changed do not make sense within the road network
Examples:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1173656466
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1173656467
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1425269819
These highways are service routes that provide access to a service station. You can check this in this paragraph in particular:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dservice#:~:text=The%20highway%3Dservice%20tag%20denotes%20ways%20used%20for%20vehicle%20access%20to%20a%20building%2C%20parking%20lot%2C%20service%20station%2C
If you have a different opinion based on the OSM Policy, I will be happy to hear that.
Regards
little_maper
Frans S (2026-07-07 14:15:41+00:00): Hello
Thanks for mapping.
A remark. 
This is a building project only.
Just map buildings and tag them as building=yes.
You also mapped small pieces of highways and tagged them as "tertiary roads," which means these are highways, connecting towns and cities. Not connecting  buildings to an adjacent road.
 Btw. You are warned by the issue triangle on these issues.
Please solve them before uploading your mappings.
Best regards
dkywxkidxjirs (2026-07-07 09:27:23+00:00): Unsure about the category. The shop does not sell packaged coffee, but just coffee in cups and snacks
Vladisl0ve (2026-07-07 09:19:43+00:00): Error: Validate Kazan Metro entrances and exits
arjunaraoc (2026-07-08 06:45:00+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  Andhra Pradesh page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Andhra_Pradesh) and  join OSM Andhra Pradesh Telegram channel (https://t.me/osmandhra).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185254002
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-07 16:35:53+00:00): SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is not allowed on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account; see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more information. Furthermore, use of Google Maps as a source is strictly prohibited by both OSM and Google policies--see https://osm.wiki/Google 

Reverted adding SEO spam POI with advertising/malformed tags and source=* of Google Maps, in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/185279027
user_15543111 (2026-07-08 23:19:23+00:00): You added the name without correctling the according name:ar tag, so the Arabic name got lost. You also didn't specified which Berber language you added ( Tamahaq, Ghadamès, Nafusi, Zuwara,  Yefren, Fezzan, Kufra or Awjilah?) For example, Nafusi should be tagged with name:jbn, not name:ber.
Libya-truth (2026-07-09 07:31:42+00:00): 1. Arabic names are preserved:
This claim is incorrect. The name:ar tag is properly set on every element that was edited. The Arabic name appears both in the name:ar tag AND within the main name tag itself. Nothing was lost  you can verify this by checking any of the edited elements. For example, node/1699640925 (Tripoli) has:

name = ⵟⴰⵕⴰⴱⵍⵓⵙ طرابلس Tripoli
name:ar = طرابلس
If you found a specific element where name:ar is missing, please share it and I will fix it immediately.

2. On the Berber language tag:
The tag name:ber is the correct ISO 639-2 macro-language code for Berber/Amazigh. I used it intentionally because the names are written in standard Tifinagh (Neo-Tifinagh / Unicode block U+2D30–U+2D7F), which is the unified Amazigh script not a transcription of any single local variety.

The individual codes you mention (jbn for Nafusi, etc.) would be appropriate if the names were written in a specific local dialect using its own orthography. That is not the case here. The Tifinagh forms used are standardized transliterations applicable across varieties, the same way name:ar uses Modern Standard Arabic rather than tagging Libyan dialect separately.

Using name:ber for unified standard Tifinagh is consistent with how OSM handles other macro-languages for example, name:zh is widely used for Chinese rather than requiring name:cmn (Mandarin) on every element.
Bienson (2026-07-08 08:14:29+00:00): Generell ist für das Löschen von Wegen aus OSM ausschließlich relevant, ob sie physisch vor Ort noch existieren (oder z.B. unpassierbar, da komplett zugewachsen). Zugangsbeschränkungen oder Barrieren können separat erfasst werden, sodass kein Routing über diese Wege erfolgt. Aber sie könnten weiterhin von Interesse sein, z.B. für Rettungs- oder Sucheinsätze.

Ob der Weg hier soweit zugewachsen ist, dass er unpassierbar ist, kann ich nicht beurteilen.
Bloomenwease (2026-07-08 09:02:58+00:00): Danke für dein Feedback. Die Pfade sind noch passierbar, allerdings nur für Abenteuerlustige. Ich habe sie wiederhergestellt, in Change 185326351 die Zäune eingefügt, die Pfade als abandoned markiert und einige weitere Werte ergänzt, die deutlichen machen sollten, dass man hier nicht mehr ohne Weiteres langgehen kann.

Ich hoffe, dass das Tagging so korrekt ist. Falls nicht, pass es gerne an und schreib mir einen kurzen Hinweis, dann sehe ich mir an, wie du das gelöst hast.
BCNorwich (2026-07-09 05:46:15+00:00): Hi, Your new highway Way: 1536130546 duplicates several existing highways, thus disrupting routing. I've removed it so all is OK now.

Please make corrections to highways on any existing ways. Please don't map over other folks' work.

Regards Bernard.
user_5359 (2026-07-08 18:50:28+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on the newest version of your entry. I had to make a slight correction to your attempt to enter an address
mkayeo (2026-07-07 12:28:40+00:00): Hi Wythenshawe Mapper, I just thought I'd explain what I was trying to do there.
Several sections of tram track already have the one way tag removed, for example the Media City spur to allow trams to enter, then come back out (the Eccles terminus has a similar set up as it reduces to one track).
We have extensive engineering works over the next couple of weeks, and will have around half a dozen tram replacement buses running. Without going into too much detail, we need to represent tram replacement buses as trams for journey planning purposes. Normally this is not an issue, as the rail replacement buses call at stations in the same order as the trams, but this time (for reasons beyond my control) we have a replacement bus which is coming from Broadway, going onto Anchorage, doing a u-turn, then coming back to Media City. 
Our system uses OSM as a base layer, so the only way I can have the 'tram' doing a u-turn at Anchorage is by removing the one way tag from that section of track. Our system takes updates from OSM overnight, so I was going to create the service today then revert the changes in OSM later today; unfortunately in this case – OSM is the source data.
Luckily, we have now found a stopgap solution to represent this particular tram replacement bus a different way, so will not need to remove the one way tags in OSM again.
osmviborg (2026-07-07 10:12:26+00:00): The aerodrome doesn't exist anymore
Jan Olieslagers (2026-07-07 10:26:37+00:00): Ah, thank you, I was already wondering. I'll tag it as "disused" so that the same mistake doesn't occur again.
Kind regards from tropical Portugal!
eggie (2026-07-07 11:58:12+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
MappingMore (2026-07-08 07:14:00+00:00): Revert of  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185219601
confusedbuffalo (2026-07-07 18:48:34+00:00): Hi, thanks for adding this. I noticed that you used building=terrace for individual houses, but it should be building=house and house=terraced
confusedbuffalo (2026-07-07 18:48:48+00:00): (I've fixed them here)
divaddivag (2026-07-09 07:08:27+00:00): Bonjour sibluvillages, 
Pourquoi revenir sur des éditions valides? La voirie propre à un camping se cartographie en highway=service comme indiqué sur le Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dservice

Le Wiki contient un grand nombres de recommendations dans le but de construire une base de données géographique fiable, vérifiable et surtout cohérente de façon collaborative. Merci d'adhérer à ce document même si la carte que vous utilisez sur le site de votre entreprise ne rend pas compte du détail que l'on peut ou doit apporter à chaque objet. OpenStreetMap est avant tout une base de données. Inutile de nommer pour décrire (ex: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1262491598) ou d'utiliser incorrectement le tag 'addr:housenumber' pour référencer les emplacements de vos mobile-homes ou ceux utilisables par des campeurs comme ici https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/817108246 . La balise *ref* est plus adaptée à ce cas d'usage.

Pour infos, vous pouvez utiliser l'imagerie préliminaire faite par l'IGN en mai 2026 en rentrant la ligne suivante dans l'onglet couche: https://data.geopf.fr/tms/1.0.0/ORTHOIMAGERY.ORTHOPHOTOS.RVB-EXPRESS.2026/{z}/{x}/{y}.jpeg

Bonne cartographie!
 David
Frans S (2026-07-07 10:02:56+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please do not include the shadow (thick black part) of a building in a mapping.
Best regards,
A67-A67 (2026-07-07 15:05:38+00:00): Als het nog steeds in aanleg is, dan is het dus geen voetpad dat al in gebruik is. De vorige tagging was correct.
JustInni (2026-07-07 21:02:12+00:00): Gelezen, dank!
eggie (2026-07-07 11:59:00+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
jeroenhd (2026-07-07 12:09:57+00:00): Dank voor het warme welkom!

Aan de geavanceerde OSM tooling ga ik me nog niet wagen, dus ik hoop door de app StreetComplete geholpen te worden met mijn bijdragen. Laat het vooral weten als ik iets beter kan doen!
eggie (2026-07-07 11:59:48+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
aceman444 (2026-07-09 20:36:46+00:00): Thanks. Do you plan to finish this further (like the new oneway roads in the campus) ?
ScarlettB (2026-07-10 06:36:27+00:00): Yes, but it may take me some time. I'll be able to survey some of it today, but the rest will have to wait as I won't be on site for a couple of weeks. If there's anything you feel is important to do sooner from just the announcement, feel free to, I'll correct any potential inaccuracies when I get to survey it properly.

I also still intend to finish micromapping it all, so everything inside the fence will make it into the map eventually.
aceman444 (2026-07-10 21:24:47+00:00): I just would like to add the newoneway roads mentioned in the announcement. Other than that, I leave it to you to make a proper survey inside the site.
pitscheplatsch (2026-07-07 11:57:51+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
Is the added name real?
JJ (1918500580), v3
radiotrefoil (2026-07-09 00:34:55+00:00): Reverted
ceirios (2026-07-08 08:10:38+00:00): Hi David,

"Y Stryd Fawr" is used to make the sentences in the article grammatically correct. I am in Swansea quite regularly and only "Stryd Fawr" is on the sign.

Please try and base your edits through on-the-ground surveys, not online articles

Diolch
Ceirios
radiotrefoil (2026-07-09 00:35:21+00:00): Reverted
d_berger (2026-07-07 22:09:37+00:00): Irgendwann ist auch mal gut. Schaust du dir die tags überhaupt an, die du an den Kreisverkehr pappst? Zweispurig mit Velostreifen beidseits? Es kann gar nicht so schwierig sein, einfach um Hilfe zu bitten, statt dieses neumodische "einfach mal was machen".
eggie (2026-07-07 12:00:32+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
d_berger (2026-07-07 22:12:54+00:00): Hier dasselbe, sogar mit falscher Umlaufrichtung. Tut mir leid, das setze ich zurück, gibt mir schlicht weniger Arbeit.

Revertiert mit CS185300392.
d_berger (2026-07-07 22:34:58+00:00): Korrigiert mit CS185301529
Frans S (2026-07-07 10:56:28+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she deliver high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (See attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
A: Inaccurate mapping. 
C: Collected adjacent buildings and mapped it as 1 building.
E: Buildings not squared or rounded.
G: Included the shadow of the building.
H: Included a yard of clearing.


Explanation can be found in this document, which might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards, and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185257495
Frans S (2026-07-07 10:56:40+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she deliver high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (See attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------


Explanation can be found in this document, which might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards, and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185257495
dzamper (2026-07-07 15:44:17+00:00): Dla https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3009732809 trzeba by name:genitive=* poprawić albo usunąć

A „Osiedle” dałbym do official_name=* albo old_name=* (zależy czy nadal obowiązuje), bo inaczej ktoś nieświadomy może zaraz przywrócić
cuzi (2026-07-12 19:04:29+00:00): I have reverted this changeset. The name field should not be used for notes about the opening times.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185608813
trigpoint (2026-07-13 14:09:20+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/185655322
NieWnen (2026-07-11 22:52:06+00:00): Cześć

jeśli ta linia: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/276791707

oraz możliwe, że inne, to CPRy (ciągi pieszo-rowerowe), to powinny być otagowane jako highway=path

Zachęcam do zapoznaniem się z wiki jak tagować ścieżki pieszo-rowerowe:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Rowery#Drogi_dla_pieszych_i_rower%C3%B3w
draxxiu (2026-07-11 22:55:22+00:00): W tym miejscu nie ma ścieżek pieszo-rowerowych. Wszystkie to ciągi piesze z warunkowym dopuszczeniem ruchu rowerów (C-16 + tabliczka więc to formalnie CPR nie jest)
NieWnen (2026-07-11 23:04:41+00:00): Ok, na to to tez jest przypadek opisany na wiki ciut wyżej :)

W takim razie należy usunąć foot=*, dać bicycle=yes i można dorzucić jeszcze segregated=*
eggie (2026-07-07 12:30:00+00:00): Dag exploseph...  attraction lijkt me niet de juiste tagging.

MVG
eggie
literan (2026-07-07 18:48:59+00:00): получается, тоже откат. Это названия станций, а не дверей
Руслан Т (2026-07-08 00:53:03+00:00): Привет! Спасибо, что подметил. Уже списались в личке по поводу отката имени.
eggie (2026-07-07 12:01:12+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community