piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2026-03-30 21:04:07+00:00): Ahh nieuw fietspad
https://viewer.satellietdataportaal.nl/@51.91702,4.576441,19/?datastrip=20260225_SVNEO-04&sensorname=SuperView-NEO
cyclist789 (2026-04-02 14:15:27+00:00): Saksenborg Bro https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1494434678

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dbridge#Delimiting_a_bridge

Jeg leder også efter en måde at placere bro-navne over små vandløb, men bro-arealet er defineret som det område, hvor der er *plads* under broen, altså det indre af vandrøret. (Og selve bro-vejstykket skal være hvor vejen overlapper med dette areal.)

Jeg har ikke tænkt mig at rette det, da jeg ikke selv er sikker på, hvordan et bro-navn skal placeres i disse tilfælde.

Hvis jeg selv placerer bro-navne den slags steder, *tror jeg*, at jeg vil bruge tunnel=culvert i stedet, og opfinde et "place=bridge" til at forbinde vej og tunnel hvor de krydser hinanden.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1494434679/history
PS: Ting Jellinge Bro er derimod ganske fin.
Jørn-osm (2026-04-02 21:17:03+00:00): Jeg har selv rettet Saksenborg Bro. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1494434678


Andre steder har jeg allerede tidligere lavet broen "skæv".
Lindesbro https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1494434676


Jeg vil anbefale at bruge de tags der allerede findes. Bronavn kan tilføjes til broomrids ( man_made=bridge ).


PS:
Brug af place=locality og lignende for at vise navn på bro er "tagging for the renderer" mener jeg.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dlocality#Other_uses
cyclist789 (2026-04-03 09:51:04+00:00): "Saksenborg Bro" er mere en tunnel=culvert under vejen end en egentlig bro over vandet, så i dens tilfælde mener jeg at et bro-omrids faktisk er "tagging for the renderer". Dog kun i en mild grad.

Jeg har tidligere sat et grimt place=locality nær nogle "broer". Disse var *grimme*, og du er ganske velkommen til at erstatte dem, men jeg ser ikke, hvordan det skulle have været "tagging for the renderer".
NeisBot (2026-03-30 21:03:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13598195965 v5

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Plumbing service"

#MapWithoutSpam
TrickyFoxy (2026-05-03 18:41:21+00:00): Здесь в глубине леса действительно гостевой дом?
eerib (2026-03-31 04:09:41+00:00): Reverted - Vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180654515
g_tr4inz (2026-04-08 11:14:53+00:00): Hallo, was ist denn die Quelle für die Änderung der Uhrzeit?

Auf der Seite der neuen Mensa (https://neue-mensa.de/) ist die Öffnungszeit bis 22:30 Uhr angegeben. Vor Ort wurde das, als ich da war, so gehandhabt, dass bis 22:00 ausgeschenkt wurde und bis 22:30 geöffnet war.
4b696d (2026-04-08 11:51:11+00:00): Moin, ich habe das mehrfach geändert, weil ich auf den Seiten des Studentenwerks unterschiedliche Angaben gefunden hatte, die sich dann auch noch geändert haben. Die Angaben, die jetzt in OSM stehen, sind die von der Seite des Studentenwerkes im Info-Bereich zur Neuen Mensa.
g_tr4inz (2026-04-08 12:33:16+00:00): Ja. Es ist irgendwie verwirrend was genau jetzt stimmt. In der Hoffnung, dass es online noch vereinheitlicht wird, habe ich dem Studentenwerk eine Mail geschrieben.
g_tr4inz (2026-04-14 09:50:55+00:00): Ich habe zwar keine Antwort erhalten, aber (vielleicht als Folge dessen) auf der Website wurden die Öffnungszeiten angepasst:

https://www.studentenwerk-dresden.de/kultur/bierstube/

Öffnungszeiten
15:30–22:30

Küchenschluss
21:00

Barschluss:
22:00

Küchenschluss kann mit opening_hours:kitchen hinterlegt werden.

Für Barschluss habe ich keinen Tag gefunden.
g_tr4inz (2026-04-14 09:55:57+00:00): Ich habe die Öffnungszeiten und Küchenschluss angepasst: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180648023
4b696d (2026-04-14 14:17:40+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours:bar
ieguy3 (2026-03-30 21:28:21+00:00): source for road name

https://uploads.itd.sbcounty.gov/gis/parcelmaps/052924.pdf
ieguy3 (2026-03-30 21:29:24+00:00): https://uploads.itd.sbcounty.gov/gis/parcelmaps/052927.pdf
NeisBot (2026-03-30 21:30:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13684974178 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Insurance office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-07 22:33:35+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181022847
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
Bobbi123 (2026-04-01 17:31:37+00:00): Bitte sei doch so nett und schreibe bei deinen Edits statt nur "Lokales Wissen" immer einen kurzen Stichpunkt-Text hin, was du editiert hast. Denn sonst müssen alle anderen Mapper mehr oder weniger immer raten, was du nun neu gemappt hast. Das wäre sehr hilfreich und kollegial, danke.
SomeoneElse (2026-04-03 15:41:20+00:00): Just checking - is the gap at https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4077753#map=19/53.130350/-2.192330 a genuine gap in the path?
dudone (2026-04-03 18:19:00+00:00): Many thanks for spotting this error.  It should now be fixed.
Dudley
SomeoneElse (2026-04-04 10:27:05+00:00): Thanks!
DaveF (2026-04-01 18:48:41+00:00): Please provide more detailed changeset comments.

What erroneous dataset are you using for these railway station amendments?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5206774617
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5206785234
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6414086721
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9754536755
NeisBot (2026-03-30 22:18:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 7 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/867308767 v2 | 4 crossings
https://osm.org/way/867308768 v2 | 3 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180649281
iandees (2026-03-30 22:35:28+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8084683933 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180649610, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
Syl (2026-03-31 08:30:03+00:00): Bonjour, merci pour toutes ces modifications.
J'aurais deux remarques :
Pour les adresses, la pratique courante c'est de les ajouter sur des nœuds à la limite entre domaine public et privé et de n'ajouter qu'une fois chaque numéro. Les adresses sur les bâtiments en plus seraient donc en trop.
- pour les piscines c'est utile de préciser quels sont à accès privé pour pouvoir les différencier des autres.

Bonne journée.
isithran (2026-04-02 03:03:58+00:00): Bonjour Syl,
Merci pour ces remarques. Je vais passer en revue (et corriger) mes changements pour corriger ces points à l'avenir.
Est-ce que je peux retrouver les piscines et adresses insérées dans mes changesets avec Overpass Turbo?
Cordialement,
Syl (2026-04-02 09:32:02+00:00): J'ai déjà corrigé les changements de ces derniers jours.
Avec Overpass, c'est possible de chercher les objets qu'on a modifié en dernier en ajoutant (user:"isithran").
isithran (2026-04-02 10:58:39+00:00): Merci pour les infos et la correction appliquée <3
literan (2026-03-31 19:38:59+00:00): вы поставили магазин ровно посередине проезжей части. Очевидно, это ошибка, поэтому правку придется отменить
Wildsharky (2026-04-01 12:55:36+00:00): Revert of 180641454
NeisAgent (2026-03-31 04:33:17+00:00): 🕵 The changeset tags appear to reference Google as a data source.

Please note that using Google Maps, Google Street View, or similar Google services as a mapping source is not allowed in OpenStreetMap due to license restrictions.

More information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google

If the data in this changeset was derived from Google or another incompatible source, the edits may need to be reverted.

If this is a misunderstanding and the data was collected from permitted sources (e.g. local survey, Bing imagery, local knowledge, etc.), please clarify in a reply.
Ltrlg (2026-04-04 07:24:03+00:00): L’étiquette name=* n’est pas prévue pour contenir des descriptions ou noms génériques, cf. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Names#Les_noms_ne_sont_pas_des_descriptions.
mw014 (2026-04-04 07:40:11+00:00): Mhh les poubelles sont très mal référencées par les apps de navigation, mais je suppose que j'ai cherché à faire le travail de ces apps à tort en modifiant les données openstreetmap, je note
mw014 (2026-04-04 08:32:52+00:00): ah non au temps pour moi, mes apps n'utilisaient simplement pas le bon langage 😅
NeisAgent (2026-03-31 04:33:19+00:00): 🕵 The changeset tags appear to reference Google as a data source.

Please note that using Google Maps, Google Street View, or similar Google services as a mapping source is not allowed in OpenStreetMap due to license restrictions.

More information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google

If the data in this changeset was derived from Google or another incompatible source, the edits may need to be reverted.

If this is a misunderstanding and the data was collected from permitted sources (e.g. local survey, Bing imagery, local knowledge, etc.), please clarify in a reply.
NeisAgent (2026-03-31 04:33:21+00:00): 🕵 The changeset tags appear to reference Google as a data source.

Please note that using Google Maps, Google Street View, or similar Google services as a mapping source is not allowed in OpenStreetMap due to license restrictions.

More information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google

If the data in this changeset was derived from Google or another incompatible source, the edits may need to be reverted.

If this is a misunderstanding and the data was collected from permitted sources (e.g. local survey, Bing imagery, local knowledge, etc.), please clarify in a reply.
NeisAgent (2026-03-31 04:33:23+00:00): 🕵 The changeset tags appear to reference Google as a data source.

Please note that using Google Maps, Google Street View, or similar Google services as a mapping source is not allowed in OpenStreetMap due to license restrictions.

More information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google

If the data in this changeset was derived from Google or another incompatible source, the edits may need to be reverted.

If this is a misunderstanding and the data was collected from permitted sources (e.g. local survey, Bing imagery, local knowledge, etc.), please clarify in a reply.
NeisAgent (2026-03-31 04:33:25+00:00): 🕵 The changeset tags appear to reference Google as a data source.

Please note that using Google Maps, Google Street View, or similar Google services as a mapping source is not allowed in OpenStreetMap due to license restrictions.

More information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google

If the data in this changeset was derived from Google or another incompatible source, the edits may need to be reverted.

If this is a misunderstanding and the data was collected from permitted sources (e.g. local survey, Bing imagery, local knowledge, etc.), please clarify in a reply.
NeisAgent (2026-03-31 04:33:26+00:00): 🕵 The changeset tags appear to reference Google as a data source.

Please note that using Google Maps, Google Street View, or similar Google services as a mapping source is not allowed in OpenStreetMap due to license restrictions.

More information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google

If the data in this changeset was derived from Google or another incompatible source, the edits may need to be reverted.

If this is a misunderstanding and the data was collected from permitted sources (e.g. local survey, Bing imagery, local knowledge, etc.), please clarify in a reply.
NeisAgent (2026-03-31 04:33:28+00:00): 🕵 The changeset tags appear to reference Google as a data source.

Please note that using Google Maps, Google Street View, or similar Google services as a mapping source is not allowed in OpenStreetMap due to license restrictions.

More information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google

If the data in this changeset was derived from Google or another incompatible source, the edits may need to be reverted.

If this is a misunderstanding and the data was collected from permitted sources (e.g. local survey, Bing imagery, local knowledge, etc.), please clarify in a reply.
NeisAgent (2026-03-31 04:33:30+00:00): 🕵 The changeset tags appear to reference Google as a data source.

Please note that using Google Maps, Google Street View, or similar Google services as a mapping source is not allowed in OpenStreetMap due to license restrictions.

More information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google

If the data in this changeset was derived from Google or another incompatible source, the edits may need to be reverted.

If this is a misunderstanding and the data was collected from permitted sources (e.g. local survey, Bing imagery, local knowledge, etc.), please clarify in a reply.
NeisBot (2026-03-30 23:30:50+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 12 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1494466474 v1 | 9 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1494466473 v1 | 3 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180650484
Wildsharky (2026-04-01 12:50:13+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:180713678
Bienson (2026-03-31 23:04:01+00:00): Hallo,

memorial=blue_plaque - "Kennzeichnet ein Denkmal als blue plaque, eine im Vereinigten Königreich verwendete Plakette, die auf berühmte Personen oder Ereignisse hinweist."

Das sind spezielle, nur in UK verwendete Gedenktafeln - auch wenn dieses Schild blau ist.

Ein memorial=plaque wäre besser.

Theoretisch ist es ja das "Straßenschild" und https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13413923922/ die eigentliche Gedenktafel, aber wüsste jetzt auch kein besseres Tag als memorial=plaque.
opnsmcb (2026-03-31 23:07:54+00:00): Gut, da war ich mir auch etwas unsicher, danke für den Hinweis.
pwbriggs (2026-04-01 06:45:38+00:00): The entire complex has a single address? Or does 20225 refer to the leasing office, etc.?

Thanks
Thoster12 (2026-04-17 15:34:34+00:00): War es gewollt, die straße "am alten Sportplatz" (1494473753) zu unterbrechen?
wermak (2026-04-18 00:39:49+00:00): War natürlich nicht gewollt. Korrigiert.
Danke.
b-jazz (2026-04-02 00:02:47+00:00): When drawing golf course areas (i.e. greens, fairways, bunkers, tees, etc.), please be aware that the ways (lines) used to outline those areas must not cross over each other. Fairway outlines shouldn't cross over greens or bunkers or other fairways for example. Take a look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Golf.png for an example of the "Wrong" way to map a fairway and a green, along with the correct way. There are some cases where a fringe exists around a green and you should draw the fairway outline completely around a green, leaving room for the fringe. Other times, the fairway and green butt up against each other. In that case the fairway and green should share the same nodes at the boundary between the two, and every node at the boundary needs to be shared, leaving no gaps. When drawing these shared nodes, editors like iD (built into openstreetmap.org) will "snap" to an existing node if you get close enough. If you have any questions about golf course mapping, feel free to reach out. Thanks.
McKulkin (2026-03-31 01:04:46+00:00): This contains fixups brought up in the discussion of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169298575
Luzandro (2026-03-31 05:40:47+00:00): Hi,

please don't set source=survey when you import data all around the world without having local knowledge. You should also follow the import guidelines: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines

Please also do not add name=Unamed, as this is obviously no name and ghostbikes shouldn't be named anyway, see 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:memorial%3Dghost_bike

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

At least at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13694227531 there is no longer a ghost bike, which is also mentioned on ghostbikes.org: "This bike has been removed." (apart from the fact that it was on the other side of the intersection)

therefore I've reverted this changeset
literan (2026-03-31 19:37:28+00:00): ресторан оказался за пределами здания
Zkir (2026-04-01 14:40:41+00:00): Там есть и летняя веранда :)
bxl-forever (2026-03-31 01:28:06+00:00): The ghost bike is already on the map here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7937343773

Please do not scrape ghostbikes.org to bulk-add every point from their database into OSM.
JuanElDemografo (2026-03-31 02:28:08+00:00): Did you discuss this mass-import of ghostbike data ahead of time with anyone? Typical policy is to get community feedback and do it from a separate account. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
mcd034 (2026-03-31 03:55:34+00:00): This missed my dupe check because it was 69 meters away from the actual location of the ghost bike and my threshold was 50 meters or a name match. I did fix one record that was at 0,0 by hand earlier.

I hand checked a number when importing and didn't see dupes from the ones that were marked. The dupe checking required 1 match of either name or < 50 meters from a point.

I just sent a changeset through deleting 47 entries that were added that were dupes.
72 were merged and updated for consistency to move the subject -> name as most of them.

Sorry for the problems. Just lost a friend and saw this as an opportunity for her and other cyclists to be remembered since many of the ghostbike sites are defunct.

I didn't realize this was something in the guidelines - it only became an issue after I was doing these one by one and not seeing any dupes that I ended up doing the rest in batch in josm.

Again, sorry for the issues - I cleaned up the issues and will verify again after tomorrow's diff comes out.
tastrax (2026-03-31 05:52:46+00:00): I couldnt find any sign of this memorial at this site. Kate was killed miles from here so are you sure its here? https://www.cyclingnews.com/news/australian-cyclist-killed-in-road-accident/
Thisik (2026-03-31 05:26:13+00:00): Hi,
I see that you probably imported the data from a database, which is fine, but apparently the names of some elements were imported incorrectly, and their name was set to "Unnamed" after the import.
ivanbranco (2026-03-31 05:56:45+00:00): > I see that you probably imported the data from a database, which is fine

Is it tho? Imports do have guidelines to be followed: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines. Also data outside NYC is at least 14 years old: "As of 2012 Ghostbikes.org has been unable to add information about Ghost Bikes outside of New York City"
Kees 59 (2026-03-31 06:42:17+00:00): Also, according to the wiki name= should not be used anymore (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:memorial%3Dghost_bike). Instead subject= should be used.
ExoMal (2026-03-31 08:15:20+00:00): I'll also add that most of these were added with source=survey which doesn't seem appropriate given they clearly haven't been recently confirmed by survey.
Taya_S (2026-03-31 09:12:14+00:00): I have reverted this import in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180662816

Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20082
Edmoguy (2026-04-26 22:13:25+00:00): What does that mean?  “the triangle is not valid”?
StreetSurveyor (2026-03-31 22:18:42+00:00): Stop adding names to the off-ramps. These are ramp links, not named roads. This is also clearly reflected in the town map. Please verify against authoritative sources such as municipal GIS data before applying names.
suzunote (2026-04-02 11:33:16+00:00): 編集ありがとうございます！
後から見返しやすくするために、あではなくもう少し何をしたのか内容が分かるコメントを書いていただけると助かります🙏

参考：変更セットの良いコメント
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:%E5%A4%89%E6%9B%B4%E3%82%BB%E3%83%83%E3%83%88%E3%81%AE%E8%89%AF%E3%81%84%E3%82%B3%E3%83%A1%E3%83%B3%E3%83%88
pwbriggs (2026-04-01 06:44:26+00:00): Thanks. Phone number format for the US in OpenStreetMap is like +1-425-892-8996 instead of what you added.

Also be aware that you tagged the opening hours as 11a-10p 7 days a week. This is fine; I just wanted to make sure this is indeed the same time every day. You could consider making the fact that this time is valid all days more explicit by doing something like "Mo-Su 11:00-22:00" instead--but again the way you've done it here is fine.

Otherwise, thanks for the contributions! We're always glad to have another member of the mapping community!
NeisBot (2026-03-31 02:15:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 7 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/684364305 v7 | 4 crossings
https://osm.org/way/684364565 v6 | 3 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180652847
iandees (2026-03-31 02:25:49+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6413567512 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180653021, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
الوعي الجديد (2026-03-31 02:33:33+00:00): مرحبا
لا يوجد هذا المكان ولا يوجد هذا الاسم 
هذه المساهمه غير حقيقيه لذالك يجب تنظيف الخريطه 
ويجب ايضا ان تكون الخريطه ذات مصداقيه للمستخدمين
لذالك ارجو حذف هذه النقطه من بيانات الخريطه لأنها مضلله ولا وجود لها
الوعي الجديد (2026-03-31 02:37:48+00:00): هذا طريق تحت الإنشاء
لا يوجد هذا الاسم في هذا المكان
قام احد المساهمين بتخطيط طريق على طريق تحت الإنشاء ولاكن هذا الطريق وهذه العقده غير موجوده بالفعل
ولا يوجد إسم شارع بهذا الاسم في هذه المنطقه
لذالك يحتوي هذا الاسم على تضليل للمستخدمين
ويجب تنظيف بيانات الخريطه من مساهمات مضلله للمستخدمين