piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
civ41 (2025-05-25 19:39:05+00:00): Intendevo dire che secondo me il campo "network" andava cambiato da lcn (Local Cycling Network) a lwn (Local Walking Network), lasciandolo hiking, perchè questi sentieri il Comune li propone per camminatori. Non è detto siano adatti a MTB
Langlaeufer (2024-11-30 15:49:45+00:00): 👍
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-06-14 12:05:34+00:00): Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4805480 ?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-16 07:58:49+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6514972121/history has fixme:type = shop that was added in this edit
What kind of shop is here?

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop for common values - is any of them fitting?
eggie (2024-11-30 19:42:43+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
trigpoint (2024-11-30 16:01:03+00:00): Reverted, changing concrete and asphalt to paved is losing data.
HellMap (2024-11-30 16:11:40+00:00): Please see previous comment at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159754735 about tagging driveways and minor roads as tracks.
Fizzie-DWG (2024-12-01 23:15:37+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16950
justb (2024-11-30 15:53:09+00:00): Zie https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159778869#map=18/51.912396/5.440838&layers=N
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-17 02:35:03+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165051606
AngocA (2025-02-02 16:44:41+00:00): Hi Nikolaj

I see you are contributing to the Colombia map, I thank for this.

Regarding waterways, they should be connected between them, to represent the flow. You map a stream not conecnted, but I already corrected.

Andres Gomez
olo81 (2024-12-01 18:02:22+00:00): nazwa opisowa do zmiany 
Plac zabaw "Statek piratów"
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Nazwy
olo81 (2024-12-01 18:02:58+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1112999391#map=19/50.330820/19.146309
to też nazwa opisowa
olo81 (2024-12-01 18:03:20+00:00): i to 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1339075251
rempshaener (2024-11-30 16:29:46+00:00): Hallo,
du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Anpassungen gebeten.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1274402680:
Eine Kombination
von
bicycle=designated
foot=designated
footway=sidewalk
highway=footway
segregated=yes
ist falsch.

Es ist eben kein „footway“, sondern „path“.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1274371875
Eine Kombination
von
bicycle=designated
foot=designated
highway=cycleway
segregated=yes
ist falsch.

Richtig wäre highway=path

Viele Grüße
eggie (2024-11-30 19:33:06+00:00): De afslagbeperkingen geven alleen maar foutmeldingen.
Van af zuid zul je noot tegen het eenrichtingsverkeer worden gestuurd.
Vanuit Oost zijn from en via niet verbonden... Er staat ook 2x from
eggie (2024-11-30 19:34:43+00:00): Vanuit noord ook op twee stukken achter elkaar from
De from begint dus ook te vroeg
eggie (2024-11-30 19:35:24+00:00): Vanuit west ook hetzelfde..
Ik draai je edits even terug.
eggie (2024-11-30 19:37:13+00:00): Daar voor was het ook al verkeerd.. dus dat heeft geen zin. 
Dus kwestie van repareren
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-11-30 19:48:41+00:00): De foutjes heb ik eruit gehaald...  Vanuit zuid staat nu geen 'Niet keren beperking' erop.
Moet dat ook niet?

MVG
eggie
valentijn09 (2024-12-01 10:42:16+00:00): Mijn excuses voor de foutmeldingen, ik ben nog niet zo ervaren.

Het probleem was dat het kruispunt toestond dat je een u-turn kon maken vanuit noord, terug naar noord. Dus wanneer je vanuit noord (Alkemadelaan) aan komt rijden richting het zuiden, er geen restrictie voor een u-turn stond, terwijl dit ter plekke wel geldt. 

Dezelfde restrictie vanuit west naar oost en vice versa. Alleen vanuit zuid naar noord geldt geen restrictie.
eggie (2024-12-01 10:55:17+00:00): Hoi Valentijn...
Dan is het nu oke. Er wordt je overigens niets kwalijk genomen.

Mvg..
eggie
rempshaener (2024-11-30 16:36:50+00:00): Hallo,

eine Bitte:
Halte bitte kurz inne und überlege, ob deine Änderungen so Sinn ergeben können:

Beispiel: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1274371778

bicycle=designated
foot=designated
footway=sidewalk
highway=cycleway

ist keine sinnvolle Kombination; das wäre ein Radweg mit einer vorgesehenen Nutzung für Radfahrer und Fußgänger in Form eines Bürgersteigs.
Bitte mache dich insbesondere mit dem Mapping von Radverkehrsanlagen vertraut, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen_kartieren

Viele Grüße
mgerken (2024-11-30 18:34:10+00:00): Moin,
mir ist nicht ganz klar was du mit diesem CS bezwecken wolltest, allerdings scheinen mir die restriction-Relationen jetzt nicht mehr korrekt zu sein. Bei einer fehlt der to Weg, die Einfahrt in die Pfarrstraße ist jetzt von einer Seite aus der Unterstraße aus kommend erlaubt.

Ich war schon länger nicht mehr dort vor Ort, daher die Frage was mit der Änderung bezweckt werden sollte, das Ergebnis ist ja nicht mehr ganz plausibel. Der Kommentar ist ja leider leer.

Beste Grüße
KartoGrapHiti (2024-11-30 18:43:04+00:00): Ich hatte vor, die Einfahrtsbeschränkungen mit Einbahnstraßen anzulegen, hatte dazu die Wegrichtungen gedreht und sah dann, dass das nicht sinnvoll ist, weil die unechten Einbahnstraßen schon mit Restriktionen eingetragen sind. Ich hoffe daher, dass alles noch so ist, wie zuvor, nur mit anderer Wegrichtung.
mgerken (2024-12-02 12:11:02+00:00): Ah, okay. Da es dann keine Unterschiede in dem Rest gibt, allerdings dadurch die drei restriction relationen kaputtgegangen sind habe ich den einfachen Ausweg genommen und das komplett revertet.

Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159840182
KartoGrapHiti (2024-12-02 12:15:16+00:00): Danke.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-11-30 16:30:49+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12386613784
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12386613783
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1163665351
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1150810655

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
philippec (2024-11-30 20:44:34+00:00): Daar maken wij eerder een note van.
Bij AEDs mag je op niets betrouwen.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-11-30 16:51:00+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12386655054

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Jrachi (2024-12-01 17:09:29+00:00): Ti chiedo scusa.
Il ETOC1040 non ha varianti nel catasto.
Avevo tolto i tag tempo fa poi un imbranato aveva riaggiunto il ref:REI ed io senza controllare bene ho poi inserito ref_reg facendolo sembrare ufficiale!.
Cancello io
Ivo
Jrachi (2024-12-01 17:11:58+00:00): Mi rimangio tutto!
Questo esiste a catasto-
Hai fatto bene a mettere il rwn
Mannagg'Ivo!
Jordi MF (2024-11-30 18:33:55+00:00): Hola Carles,

Gràcies per millorar la base de dades d'OSM i per utilitzar el Nomenclàtor de l'AVL disponible en el visor de l'ICV.

He vist que has modificat el nom d'una rotonda. En realitat, en OSM, les rotondes no han de dur cap nom a no ser que oficialment existisca una placa (Glorieta de...; Plaça de..., etc.). Per això, el nom anterior era incorrecte, però també és el de "Rotonda CV-406" (aquest nom seria de tipus descriptiu i no està acceptat en les normes d'OSM (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions).

Ho corregiré. Moltes gràcies de nou. Per cert, en Telegam tenim un grup d'usuaris valencians que editem en OSM (busca "Comunitat valenciana d'OpenStreetMap" i entra-hi, si et ve de gust).

Salutacions,
Jordi
citrula (2024-12-01 00:05:12+00:00): street is named 3451? Did you mean to add an address to a building, instead?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159780973
TheSpoingle (2024-12-01 04:41:33+00:00): The street sign just said "3451" I thought it was odd as well when I saw it. I'll go double check tomorrow just in case.
citrula (2024-12-01 09:58:25+00:00): That is odd. I looked on streetside imagery and wasn't able to read the sign, either
TheSpoingle (2024-12-01 18:07:08+00:00): I took a photo of the sign that I uploaded here: https://files.catbox.moe/crtvnp.jpg and you can also see the sign on Google Maps street view here: https://maps.app.goo.gl/HSxidkzG4TirnKTs7?g_st=ac I'm still very new to this stuff so let me know if I am misinterpreting the meaning of the sign but I think the road really is named 3451.
citrula (2024-12-02 14:30:59+00:00): Thanks for the photo. I checked the NAD dataset and realized that this corresponds with the address of the townhomes which can be accessed from this road - I think this is something closer to an address marker than a street name. Very strange situation though.
citrula (2024-12-04 14:23:05+00:00): I discussed this with some people in the OSM US slack and I am pretty confident that this is not the street name. I think it acts as a guidepost to find that specific address - I have hopefully clarified this situation by adding not:name tag to the street as well as the addresses to all of the houses which have that street address (there are a lot!). Maybe next time someone sees that sign it will be clearer what is going on here.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159921109
muralito (2024-11-30 23:40:12+00:00): Hi CharliePlett. I disagree with the choice of how to map this communities. At least in Uruguay, they are no administrative boundaries and should not be mapped as such. Please propose another way to map them. Thank you.
CharliePlett (2024-12-01 03:31:32+00:00): Hmm, I guess I could map them as a village area.
muralito (2024-12-01 14:20:19+00:00): Thanks. What to you think about mapping them as place=farm? Aren't mennonite colonies farms?

Wouldn't  be helpful to also tag them with religion=christian + denomination=mennonite ? These tags would be needed to find mennonite features based on them and not in names or other attributes.

Anyways, are you sure mennonite colonies want/like to be mapped in public databases like OSM or they would prefer to not, and keep lower profile to be easier to follow their religious precepts?
CharliePlett (2024-12-05 16:42:33+00:00): First of all I am from a Mennonite community. And it's probably true that they don't like to be mapped, but so do lots of people who's houses you map. I recently started mapping the villages as place=village instead of boundaries. I'm just used to mapping all villages as boundaries in Belize where I do most of my mapping. And I wouldn't tag them as place=farm, because to me a place=farm is a single farm with a name, like Peters Farm.
JJIglesias (2024-12-01 23:46:44+00:00): Por Favor NO CREES nuevas vias sobre las YA EXISTENTES, al hacerlo creaste decenas de errores en esa zona. Si quieres poner Nombres hazlo en las calles EXISTENTES, no montando unas sobre otras.

Por favor revisa https://learnosm.org

Gracias
JJIglesias (2024-12-01 23:49:29+00:00): Los nombres deben ir Capitalizados: 

No se coloca: CALLE JUNIN, sino Calle Junion, lo mismo aplica a TODOS los nombres q se pongan en el Mapa, solo la Primera letra de la palabra van en Mayusculas, no toda la palabra.

Ya modificamos y Corregimos todo lo q pusiste en Palmar Chico
Gracias
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-06 04:20:42+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164574226
karson_ (2024-12-03 05:33:56+00:00): whoops
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159781370
ChrissW-R1 (2024-12-30 01:45:01+00:00): Hi @karson_,

I don't know the name of this road, but I found the conspicuous tag "ixme" via Taginfo.
JJIglesias (2024-12-01 23:45:14+00:00): Por Favor NO CREES nuevas vias sobre las YA EXISTENTES, al hacerlo creaste decenas de errores en esa zona. Si quieres poner Nombres hazlo en las calles EXISTENTES, no montando unas sobre otras.

Por favor revisa htpps://learnosm.org

Gracias
JJIglesias (2024-12-01 23:45:46+00:00): https://learnosm.org
Dawid2849 (2024-12-01 12:28:15+00:00): O, dzięki. Właśnie miałem się tym zająć
martianfreeloader (2024-11-30 18:19:10+00:00): Hi,

Please try to be more specific in your changeset comments, so other mappers can understand your intentions. 
What exactly has been fixed?
Milaviy4 (2024-12-02 21:22:09+00:00): Hello. Sorry about that. If I recall corectly, I just slightly changed the position of the road to match the satellite
martianfreeloader (2024-12-03 06:42:26+00:00): Thanks! In cases like this, some mappers (including myself) simply comment the changeset with "Alignment" or similarly.

When we make "real" changes, it's good to comment it in a way such that others have a chance to understand what's being done. This page gives a rough guide:
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Happy mapping!
qazav (2025-02-08 23:31:07+00:00): Removido. Você está desenhando ciclovias em ruas que já possuem ciclofaixas demarcadas como atributos do viário
flohoff (2024-12-01 08:21:38+00:00): Moin,
ich bin gerade über den changeset gestolpert weil der doch weitreichende Routingänderungen verursacht hat.

Weisst du bis wann das planmäßig gesperrt sein soll? Mein Google Foo hat nur herrausgearbeitet das es eigentlich schon fertig sein sollte.

Flo
felGru (2024-12-01 19:45:04+00:00): Hi Flo,
ich weiß leider auch nicht genau, bis wann die Sperrung geplant ist. Ich bin gestern dort vorbei gekommen und die Straße war noch aufgebaggert. Von daher gehe ich aus, dass die Bauarbeiten auch noch eine Weile dauern.

Im Moment wird der Verkehrder von Süden kommt über den Markt und die Hochstraße geleitet. Für Busse weiß ich nicht, wie die Umleitungen aussehen, aber die Straßen am Markt sind wahrscheinlich zu eng und haben zu scharfe Kurven für Busse.

Gruß
Felix
JJIglesias (2024-12-01 23:10:47+00:00): Por Favor NO CREES nuevas vias sobre las YA EXISTENTES, al hacerlo creaste decenas de errores en esa zona. Si quieres poner Nombres hazlo en las calles EXISTENTES, no montando unas sobre otras.

Por favor revisa learnosm.org

Gracias
JJIglesias (2024-12-01 23:11:11+00:00): https://learnosm.org
jb54osm (2024-11-30 22:17:43+00:00): Hi Tobias,

Thanks for the pub.
In The Netherlands we place the amenity/shop on the adress node. I moved the POI-data to the adress node.
Tjuro (2024-12-01 10:15:00+00:00): Hello Szipek,

i see that you added some buildings here, when drawing buildings by hand please use the squaring tool (Q) when appropriate to make the drawn building square. I see that you added adreses to these buildings, addresses should be placed on nodes, and there should generally only be one node with the same address info.

I hope you can take these tips into account.

Greetings,

Tjuro
Szipek (2024-12-01 11:56:30+00:00): Hello Tjuro,

Thanks for the advice. This was my first attempt to draw buildings. I am going to read the documentation and adjust this change.
First3h (2024-12-06 16:07:04+00:00): dolby_atmos != dolby_cinema
citrula (2024-12-01 00:01:27+00:00): Looks good now, thanks for your contribution
flohoff (2024-12-01 08:34:25+00:00): Hi,
i dont think all your changes are correct.

People tagging buildings as pavillon when they have non fixed roofs - as a pavillon.

The osm wiki using "pavilion" describes a completely different building type.

So its not a typo but a different meaning.

Could you point me to the discussion about this automatic mass edit?

Flo
marczoutendijk (2024-12-01 12:13:25+00:00): I assumed that people using "pavillon" instead of "pavilion" simply made a typing mistake.
E.g. using "railway_staton" deliberately to describe something different then a "railway_station" is an example of bad practice in my opinion.

And btw. it wasn't an automated mass edit but I visited all occasions one by one to do the change in good faith as I considered it (and still do) a "typo"
If people do want to use "pavillion" and "pavillon" next to (the wiki described) "pavilion", there should be a mechanism preventing them for doing so. Unfortunately there isn't.
Marc.
marczoutendijk (2024-12-01 12:19:37+00:00): I have added a page to the wiki to describe my action.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:building%3Dpavilion#Typing_error_with_name
flohoff (2024-12-01 13:46:12+00:00): I disagree on this "correction". 

"pavilion" as a building type is pretty uncommon in Germany, and would mostly associated with sports. 

It is much more common to name Kiosk type buildings in parks as "pavillon", or building structures without a fixed roof - tent like structures.

And looking at the first changeset creating this building supports that.

Flo
flohoff (2024-12-01 13:50:16+00:00): I created a community forum thread to get some light into this and other opinions:

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/typo-correction-building-pavillon-building-pavilion/122416
R0bst3r (2024-12-01 14:08:55+00:00): @marczoutendijk, your misunderstanding ist described at the bottom of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dpavilion
marczoutendijk (2024-12-01 16:32:56+00:00): If one searches in the OSM wiki for "pavillon", you are being asked: do you mean "pavilion"?
If one searches in the OSM wiki for "pavillion", you are being asked: do you mean "pavilion"?
If (and it might be true) that there is an other type of building, named "pavillon (tagged first in 2017, and it is indeed in my German dictionary) then there should have been a wiki describing it, and that wiki should also point out the differences between a "pavillon" and a "pavilion".
If I understand flohoff well, then this is correct:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159783974 (because I changed pavillion to pavilion)
but this one is not correct:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/483419854 (because I changed pavillon to pavilion )

Worldwide I found 48 occurences of pavillion.
Worldwide I found 47 occurences of pavillon.
(And worldwide I found 14491 occurences of pavilion).

I did not change all of the pavillion/pavillon occurences to pavilion because I didn't have the time, as I visit all those (in my opinion typos) one by one to check what I change, and if it has the tag building=pavillon/pavillion I changed it to building=pavilion for reasons I have explained already.

If there should be a valid building=pavilion AND a valid building=pavillon in the wiki (and on OSM), then we are 7 years late.

I shall follow the discussion (started by flohoff) on the forum.

Marc.
marczoutendijk (2024-12-05 19:08:22+00:00): See: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/typo-correction-building-pavillon-building-pavilion/122416
marczoutendijk (2024-12-05 19:08:30+00:00): see: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/typo-correction-building-pavillon-building-pavilion/122416
marczoutendijk (2024-12-05 19:08:44+00:00): See: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/typo-correction-building-pavillon-building-pavilion/122416
marczoutendijk (2024-12-05 19:08:52+00:00): See:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/typo-correction-building-pavillon-building-pavilion/122416
wambacher (2024-12-02 12:03:19+00:00): Auch hier ist mMn "deine" Adresse falsch. Das Haus liegt nun mal in Nürnberg und hat eine endsrechende Adresse. Wenn man bei den Bayern spickt, liegt die Admin Boundary einige Meter weit nach Süd-Ost und macht die Sache noch klarer. 
Der gesamte Klingenberg liegt in Nürnberg - das hatten wir doch schon mal so.

Die Frage, ob du zwecks "eigener Recherhe" dort geklingelt hast, erspare ich mir diesmal.

Gruß
walter
wambacher (2024-12-04 12:32:02+00:00): Ich warte immer noch auf eine Antwort, obwohl du weiter aktiv bist.
Ich hoffe, dass ich nicht die Foundation ansprechen muss
Dawid2849 (2024-12-01 12:27:39+00:00): Nazwa nie dość, że sztucznie rozwinięta, to jeszcze niepoprawna (brzmi inaczej w uchwale), a sama edycja źle wykonana (trawa oraz znaki ustępu nie mają nazwy). Poprawiłem.
eggie (2024-11-30 20:03:38+00:00): Hi bytara. Is here realy a shop shop=doors with the English name=Barrier gate?
Did you mean an additional tag to the Waterpoort? 
This is already mapped in OSM. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Ddoors

It looks like tagging for the render to get an icon from a door?

Greetz,
eggie

Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2024-11-30 20:05:45+00:00): For now I removed shop=doors with name= Barrier gate
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=159784718

Greetz,
eggie
bytara12 (2024-12-02 20:14:08+00:00): Sorry, it's indeed to get the correct icon of a doorway. I didn't know what tag wout fit a door in a fence well. I'll have to read more into it
eggie (2024-12-02 20:42:22+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice
eggie (2024-11-30 19:25:37+00:00): Hi bytara  You are sure the Dutch name is 
  	City gate?

Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2024-11-30 19:53:42+00:00): name=City gate verwijderd.
The description will do.
Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2024-11-30 19:24:28+00:00): Hi bytara.. Pease don't deleate the BAG addressnode. 
I restored the address.
Greetz,
eggie
emersonveenstra (2024-11-30 19:39:58+00:00): Hi there,

Why did you remove the crossing tags from this crossing?
Stravarunner (2024-12-01 01:52:19+00:00): The crossing was not showing up on another place I access OSP. I was checking if it was because of this, or if it was bugging.
emersonveenstra (2024-12-02 23:38:57+00:00): Thanks for the response, in the future please don't delete tags like this, because very often people forget to put them back
Dawid2849 (2024-12-01 12:26:34+00:00): Proszę o nie dodawać nazw opisowych do obiektów: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Cz%C4%99ste_b%C5%82%C4%99dy_u%C5%BCytkownik%C3%B3w#Nazwy_opisowe
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Nazwy#Nazwa_jest_tylko_nazw%C4%85
NeisBot (2024-11-30 19:34:38+00:00): Hi giovanajacomo, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 92% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 11 highway(s)
- 6 building(s)
- 4 natural(s)
- 6 landuse(')

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=159785378
pitscheplatsch (2024-12-01 09:59:21+00:00): Please do NOT remove valid OSM data! Thanks.

Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/159799740

#vandalism
felipeeugenio (2024-11-30 23:34:54+00:00): Hola. por favor no usar contracciones.
Escribir las palabras completas. no tiene sentido usar eso en un medio digital.
gracias
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159785630
BrunoTDG0000000 (2024-12-01 00:12:42+00:00): Hola, los nombres los extraje de Google Maps, aún no he estado presencialmente en ese sector, lo tendré presente.
felipeeugenio (2024-12-01 00:31:42+00:00): Hola Bruno.
Extraer nombres de Google maps está terminantemente prohibido por cada rincón de texto que hay escrito en torno a OSM. Tan solo el hecho de que me lo escribas en un foro público da a entender lo poco que conoces el proyecto.
Entiendo que tratas de ayudar y no cuestiono tus intenciones, pero eso es una falta muy grave que me va a hacer tener que reversar tu edición y quizás revisar todo lo que has hecho en OSM.
Por favor no hagas eso nunca mas.
GM no nos da una licencia que permita copiar su información, además de estar llena de errores.

saludos
felipeeugenio (2024-12-01 00:32:47+00:00): Se reversa edición por infringir términos de Copyright.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159785630