piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ffmp (2026-04-17 04:16:55+00:00): Hello, seems this changeset is wrong. See
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181362737#c1584520
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-05-26 02:31:36+00:00): Reverted removal of valid building=yes tag and addition of nonsensical/malformed/SEO spam tags to POI "Dr. Halil ILGIN"

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183183485
NeisBot (2026-04-16 06:54:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13733962627 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Botanical shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
Tuplanolla (2026-04-17 20:35:02+00:00): Kävitkö paikan päällä selvittämässä tilanteen? Piirsin polut kartalle hakkuiden jälkeen juuri ennen lumien satamista 2025-12-23, kun urat olivat vielä hyvin ajokelpoiset. Kevään tullen `highway=path` olisi ehkä ollut sopivampi, mutta urien täydellinen häviäminen epäilyttää.
MallasMankeli (2026-04-18 09:57:04+00:00): Alueella on aloitettu laaja tieverkoston ja kunnallistekniikan rakentaminen. Hakkuualueet ovat myös tällä hetkellä siviileiltä suljettua aluetta työmaiden takia. Joku polun pätkä sieltä voi edelleen löytyä, mutta tulee tuskin olemaan kulkukunnossa, kun alue taas avautuu yleisölle. Kaivuun lisäksi siellä on myös räjäytelty paljon ja työt jatkuu vielä tovin.
pwbriggs (2026-04-16 17:20:53+00:00): Oh, you did decide they were one way after all?
pesticides (2026-04-16 17:57:43+00:00): Since the gaps in the concrete median are on either side of the centerline of NW 51st St, I felt it was clear SDOT intended them to be used in the direction of the (unmarked) lane each gap is aligned with.
pwbriggs (2026-04-16 18:13:20+00:00): Sounds good
rhtb0 (2026-04-16 07:47:26+00:00): In fact, stations and stop position, platform on all Seoul subway lines operated by Korail are all tagged as train, not subway
rhtb0 (2026-04-16 07:51:20+00:00): Examples include Line 1, Line 4, Suin-bundang Line, Gyeongui-Jungang Line, etc korail line.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2026-04-19 01:25:46+00:00): Your edits left broken jagged disconnected motorways.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181398247
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2026-04-26 02:34:32+00:00): Please clean these up
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-04-30 15:51:55+00:00): I fixed them.
NeisBot (2026-04-16 07:24:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13734026369 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Medical Spa"

#MapWithoutSpam
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-16 08:49:29+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

Is the following road name real?
"Mechanical/Admin"

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/866634305/history/6
nevw (2026-04-16 12:55:10+00:00): Hi, you appear to have located Lotus Massage in the service station building instead of the Fitness First building.
NeisBot (2026-04-16 07:36:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/351651421 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Medical Institute"

#MapWithoutSpam
Rawaz (2026-05-13 10:49:52+00:00): There is solar panel on the roof

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:generator:source%3Dsolar
NeisBot (2026-04-16 07:57:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 8 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1499822991 v1 | 4 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=181399528
SeventhFret (2026-04-16 09:41:50+00:00): Hi. Thank you for mapping bicycle infrastructure. 
When mapping, please refer to this page. I think "cycleway=shared_lane" should be tagged to highway, not individual way. 
[JA:自転車 - OpenStreetMap Wiki](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:%E8%87%AA%E8%BB%A2%E8%BB%8A) 
[JA:Tag:cycleway=shared_lane - OpenStreetMap Wiki](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Tag:cycleway%3Dshared_lane)
Wildsharky (2026-04-17 12:13:26+00:00): Revert of 181349305
eggie (2026-04-16 08:37:34+00:00): Dag Jordi,

Lijkt me oke. Wel heb ik alle info naar de adresnode verplaatst.
MVG
eggie
iamJordi (2026-04-16 09:31:51+00:00): Goedemorgen eggie,

Het viel mij op dat de opening_hours  ook de drive_through hours bevatte, terwijl er een aparte tag hiervoor was. Was niet 100% zeker of dit correct was.

Wat mij inderdaad ook opviel, was dat de tags van de McDonald's in het gebouw zelf zaten en niet in de adresnode. Super bedankt voor de aanpassing.

MVG,
Jordi
eggie (2026-04-16 09:52:52+00:00): Up to you..De openingstijden heb ik niet naar gekeken.
Gr eggie
blef (2026-04-17 09:55:52+00:00): Bonjour, je suis revenu sur vos modifications: le tag access=bus est déconseillé. Voir commentaires sur https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181447852
eggie (2026-04-16 08:25:43+00:00): Dag sv   Dit kan nooit routeren voor fietsers, want er zit nog een stukje wandelpad tussen.
Staat het G7 bord er nog of is dit tijdelijk vervangen door bord Fietspad G11 /G12a?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-04-16 08:30:16+00:00): Ik heb het stukje wandelpad ook aangepast naar fietspad zodat het routeert voor tweewielers.
G7 bebording heb ik voorlopig verwijderd. 
MVG
eggie
svgameren (2026-04-16 12:19:58+00:00): Ik ben er recent langs gefietst en er stond zeker geen G7 bord meer maar of het een G11 of G12a was heb ik niet gezien, ik denk eigenlijk een G13 maar weet dat niet zeker.
eggie (2026-04-16 12:23:07+00:00): Oke, maar het routeert in ieder geval nu en daar gaat het om :)
rempshaener (2026-04-16 20:45:44+00:00): Hallo,

du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Du schreibst, „Das Klinikum hat die eigene Postleitzahl 66421.“
Ich vermute, damit meinst du eine Großempfänger-Postleitzahl.

Die Anpassung ist an einigen Stellen problematisch.
- Die neue Adresse hast du an https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/359140392 gepackt, obwohl die Uniklinik als Gesamtensemble bereits erfasst ist.
- Die Angabe von Adresse und Großempfänger-PLZ ist eher unüblich; entweder mit Straße und „normaler“ PLZ oder Großempfänger-PLZ. Bei Großempfängern ist eine Angabe von Straße und Hausnummer nicht notwendig, weil sie bereits durch die Angabe von Postleitzahl und Ort hinreichend identifiziert werden. (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gro%C3%9Fempf%C3%A4nger_(Deutsche_Post))
- Es gibt kein wirkliches Tagging-Schema für Großempfänger, siehe z. B. https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/sind-adressen-in-osm-amtlich-oder-postalisch/99332/54 oder https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/grossempfanger-plz-wie-bezeichnen/81386/32. Daher wird darauf meist verzichtet.
- Du hast in die Relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5764790 das o. a. Gebäude eingeschlossen, obwohl die Fläche bereits in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/387596720 enthalten ist. Das ist so nicht richtig.

Ich tendiere dazu, deine Änderung zurückzusetzen.

Bei Fragen bitte melden.
Viele Grüße
Jürgen Steiner (2026-04-17 06:57:35+00:00): Vielen Dank für die Erläuterungen. Ja es handelt sich um eine Großempfänger-Postleitzahl. Unsere Datenbank kommt deshalb wie einige Navigationsgeräte mit so einer PLZ nicht zurecht. Da man das in OSM nicht korrekt hinterlegen kann, können gerne diese Änderungen zurückgenommen werden. Wir werden für diese Sonderpostleitzahlen eine separate Tabelle anlegen, die ergänzend zu den OSM-Daten bei uns eingebunden wird.
rempshaener (2026-04-17 17:09:49+00:00): Danke für die Rückmeldung, habe ich erledigt.
Viele Grüße
matheusgomesms (2026-04-16 09:00:10+00:00): Hi LakeMagadi,

Do you have any evidence this segment is open? I put construction because I was there in February and it's closed until 2027, due to the railway works.

Official source: https://www.ceara.gov.br/2026/02/10/avenida-do-aeroporto-acesso-a-av-alberto-craveiro-sera-bloqueado-a-partir-desta-quarta-feira-11/

If I'm still correct, could you please revert your edits?

Thanks!
Matheus
LakeMagadi (2026-04-17 06:44:44+00:00): Hello matheusgomesms! I appreciate you reaching out to me. I had thought the road was open and apologize for updating the tagging prematurely. I will set (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/187068952) back to construction status. Thank you and happy mapping!
matheusgomesms (2026-04-17 08:26:48+00:00): Thanks!
vectorial8192 (2026-04-16 10:50:17+00:00): But, for example, those roads have no names. We may consider them separate roads from e.g. Lai Chi Kok Road, especially when there is a junction with Mount Sterling Mall. Then, those may be classified differently from e.g. Lai Chi Kok Road themselves.
kingkingHK (2026-04-16 13:56:46+00:00): Imo highway classification should be considered between junctions, not between "roads", whatever that means. Road names are not indicative of "roads" either; road names practically no one effect in the real world.

"Junction with Mount Sterling Mall" is basically not an argument, as Mount Sterling Mall does not allow motorised traffic. The westbound one is even worse. Three is nothing fundamentally different between this and e.g. Wong Tai Sin Ching Tak Street or Lung Yuet Road - Cornwall Street.  If you want to do this, you should have extended link to the traffic signal, not that it makes it correct, just less wrong.
atchisson (2026-04-16 10:30:46+00:00): Bonjour, et merci pour ces mises à jour !

Pour le bâtiment https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1499827805 , vous l'avez indiqué en "landuse=retail"
Les landuse sont plus adaptées pour définir l'utilisation du terrain, comme par exemple ici : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/336415354
Pour indiquer un bâtiment commercial, il est préférable d'utiliser "building=retail" ; ainsi que "shop=vacant" pour indiquer qu'il n'y a pas encore de commerce dedans.

Si ces tags ne vous parlent pas, ils sont visibles à gauche de l'écran, dans la section "Attributs" de l'éditeur.

Les traductions de l'éditeur sont souvent assez approximatives, il vaut mieux se référer à ces tags plutôt qu'aux différents noms. Le wiki est aussi une bonne source de documentation : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:landuse%3Dretail

Bonne cartographie
Hike'n'bike (2026-04-16 13:11:14+00:00): Merci beaucoup pour ces remarques, cela m'apprend à m'améliorer !
FajrAl (2026-06-21 03:01:15+00:00): sepertinya dobel itu yang deket Cisadane. Ini garis bukan jalan: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1499827874
eggie (2026-04-16 08:43:22+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback De bijgebouwen heb ik wat uitgelijnd conform de BGT.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
OSMthechallenger (2026-04-19 11:09:25+00:00): Почему Вы откатили свои правки и какие?
dadavid (2026-04-16 09:37:27+00:00): Hallo Epassi_Lennard, willkommen bei OSM und danke für deine Bearbeitung :) 

Ich glaube da ist ein bisschen was schiefgelaufen, die Straße existierte bereits, aber als Fussweg. Ausserdem ist die neu von dir eingezeichnete Straße am Westlichen Ende nicht bis zum Ende geführt :) Wenn der Fußweg nicht komplett separat zur Straße läuft, sollte nur ein Weg eingezeichnet werden, der dann zum Beispiel als Ortsstraße (highway=residential) eingezeichnet wird. Am östlichen Ende ist er ja auch in der Realität nicht mit dem Kastanienweg als Straße verbunden sondern in dem Abschnitt nur ein Fussgweg. Kannst/magst du das so umsetzen? 
Melde dich bei Fragen gern :) 

Viele Grüße

David
Epassi_Lennard (2026-04-16 11:27:42+00:00): Moin David :) 

Ich war hier indem Fall selber etwas überfordert wie es richtig ist, da das Schwimmbad wohl eine eigene Adresse hat. Theoretisch ist das ja keine richtige Straße dort, daher hatte ich es jetzt so angegeben. Kannst du es sonst so anpassen, wie es richtig wäre? Ich weiß jetzt gerade nicht wie das funktionieren soll :/ 
Unser System hatte die Straße "Zum Flaakebad" auf jeden Fall vorher nicht gefunden, jetzt funktionierte es.
Liebe Grüße
Lennard
iandees (2026-04-16 14:52:25+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/42474242 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181418202, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
NeisBot (2026-04-16 08:46:23+00:00): 🌍 欢迎来到 OSM，Hutao0514。
谢谢你的贡献！

为了使协作更容易，并帮助他人理解你的编辑，最好添加你所做的更改的简要描述。清晰的评论可以帮助社区跟踪你的工作并提供更好的反馈。你可以在这里[1]找到写好评论的提示。

✅ 这里有一个基于你地图编辑的示例评论： "添加了服务道路，路径，住宅道路和隧道"
(Auto-translation)
---
🌍 Welcome to OSM, Hutao0514.
Thanks for contributing!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

✅ Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added service roads, path, residential road, and tunnel"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment
nevw (2026-04-16 12:42:20+00:00): I deleted this business placed on the roadway centreline on different that tagged
nevw (2026-04-16 12:45:56+00:00): …corr - wrong street location
NeisBot (2026-04-16 08:43:33+00:00): Hello OrangeLabel, welcome to OSM, and thank you for your contributions!

I've taken a look at your recent edits and wanted to discuss a few discrepancies I noticed regarding the surrounding environmental features. Specifically, the locations in your edits don't seem to align with the typical geographical characteristics expected in that area. Here are some (max 10) relevant links to the edits:
https://osm.org/node/13734213801

Could you please take a look?
Looking forward to your response.

#Somewhere
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=181401780
sge444 (2026-07-20 15:40:17+00:00): This looks like fake
Jacques Faulkner (2026-04-16 09:12:18+00:00): just realised this isn't eve parc, apologies
RailandSea (2026-04-22 02:33:52+00:00): This is yard industrial track part of oak point yard not a branch main line.
iandees (2026-04-16 14:52:29+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6316490999 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181418207, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
Peter Agenga (2026-04-16 19:20:58+00:00): Thank you for that BTW. I didn't notice the error!
eggie (2026-04-16 09:05:02+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
feedback   De bedrijfsnfo heb ik verplaatst naar de adresnode. In OSM Nederland svp bijtaggen op de adresnodes.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-04-16 09:11:13+00:00): Er 'moet' wel een bezoekadres zijn voor klanten. Alleen een onlinebedrijf nemen we niet op in OSM. 
Een bedrijf moet ook 'in het veld' verifieerbaar zijn middels een bedrijfsnaam. 

MVG
eggie
ictlesley (2026-04-16 09:21:31+00:00): goedemorgen eggie. 
Bezoekers kunnen ook gewoon langs komen,
eggie (2026-04-16 09:24:01+00:00): 👍
Evt kun je phone=+31.. en website= toevoegen.
ictlesley (2026-04-16 09:33:16+00:00): Hey eggie. 

Als het goed is staan deze er nu bij.
eggie (2026-04-16 09:48:32+00:00): Dan alle info wel toevoegen aan de adresnode   plus office=it mocht dat er nog niet bijstaan.
Dus geen bedrijfsnaam op de gebouwomtrek.
eggie (2026-04-16 12:21:52+00:00): Aangepast als bovenstaand. Gebouw weer ontdaan van info
frspp (2026-06-21 17:43:49+00:00): Siinä tapauksessa korjaa tägit, älä poista
infeeeee (2026-04-17 13:28:25+00:00): Hello

Why did you change this back to the wrong tag? The wiki is quite clear which tag should be used here:

> It is meant for areas that have a clear direction of travel, and is used as a form of Micromapping in addition to the routable, linear way tagged as highway=pedestrian. Specifically, it is not the same as highway=pedestrian + area=yes, which represents a non-linear area, such as a square or plaza, where multi-directional travel is possible. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:area:highway%3Dpedestrian

I want to hear your rationale before I revert this change. I'm planning to go through your other similar wrong tags in the downtown, but it takes some time to clean up the intersections.

If you just want to use this tagging because it's displayed on osm.org default Carto, then you should open an Issue here: https://github.com/openstreetmap-carto/openstreetmap-carto This is called tagging for the renderer and it's forbidden: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer

Happy mapping!
dadavid (2026-04-16 09:26:50+00:00): Hallo MosesT, 
du hast um Feedback gebeten :) 
ich glaube hier hast du aus Versehen einen Adress-Knoten verschoben, kann das sein? :) 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2520297696/history#map=19/50.274630/7.838098

Viele Grüße und weiterhin viel Spass beim Mappen. 

David
蕉饼电脑 (2026-04-16 16:03:18+00:00): 停止破坏地图数据
NeisBot (2026-04-16 09:09:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 39 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1499838819 v1 | 4 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1499838795 v1 | 4 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1499838849 v1 | 3 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=181402858
Lepidobatrachus (2026-04-19 15:04:27+00:00): Использовать обозначение highway=track в данном случае неправильно. Информация из вики: "highway=track не обозначает "качество" дороги, её покрытие, наличие выраженной колеи. Тег не предназначен для указания разбитых, узких, не имеющих покрытия дорог и дорог, передвижение по которым может быть затруднено! highway=track применяется для обозначения безымянных (часто грунтовых, но покрытие не является квалифицирующим признаком) дорог, используемых обычно сельскохозяйственной техникой для передвижения по полю, и лесных дорог, которые не используются для транзитного проезда. То есть отличительным признаком highway=track является использование, а не состояние дороги" 
Исходя из использования этой дороги, тут должен быть highway=residential, а для обозначения проходимости и покрытия следует использовать smoothness= и surface= с соответствующими значениями
Jacques Faulkner (2026-04-16 09:12:24+00:00): just realised this isn't eve parc, apologies
qstep (2026-04-16 09:29:48+00:00): Szia. Megfordítottad a https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/721014332 szakaszt, ezzel megtört az utca egyirányúsága. Javítottam.
infeeeee (2026-04-21 13:59:54+00:00): Arra mentem ma, nem lett egyirányú a Kökörcsinnek az a szakasza. OpenStreetMap-en a valóságot térképezzük. Javítva: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181629348
NeisBot (2026-04-16 09:18:41+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 14 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1102459184 v1 | 6 crossings
https://osm.org/way/572651593 v6 | 5 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1123136546 v4 | 3 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/10088094922 v3

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=181403311
hsc666 (2026-04-16 15:21:34+00:00): war bereits eingetragen. Duplikat gelöscht.
Wildsharky (2026-04-21 03:32:35+00:00): Revert of 181402573
eggie (2026-04-16 09:49:46+00:00): Denk de extra info bijtaggen op de adresnode. Niet op het gebouw.
NeisBot (2026-04-16 09:42:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13734281339 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Facial Plastic Surgery Clinic"

#MapWithoutSpam
MassCartog (2026-04-16 13:03:09+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM. Features you removed in this changeset are valid. Please don’t remove valid OSM data.

You have a new account and might not be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground. If it exists on the ground, it is valid data regardless of a feature being public or private, designated or informal/illegal/unauthorized. Removing features that exist is actually considered vandalism.

It's clear that these features still exist on the ground. Not being public access areas is an invalid reason to remove data from OSM. So this edit is incorrect and damaging to valid OSM data.

The correct way to handle this is to use OSM's tagging system. access=private, or access=no would be appropriate if they are closed to the public. Once this is done, services that do use OSM data will reflect that and specify their access.

Please read this for more info:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won't_delete_roads_on_private_property
LordGarySugar (2026-04-24 17:57:53+00:00): Hi, I thought we reached a consensus on the forums not to excessively divide residential landuse up like this, I've put a new reply there asking for opinions about if we should be mapping at a plot level: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/individual-residential-landuse-for-each-house-or-street-good-or-bad/136497/95