piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:35:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:37:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:34:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:37:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
Ismael Olea (2025-11-11 10:38:15+00:00): The changes look accurate. THANKS!
World_Winner (2025-11-11 11:47:56+00:00): Hi Ismael Olea,

Thank you very much for acknowledging this. I’m glad to expand my knowledge and understanding and always happy to improve the map.
Ismael Olea (2025-11-11 12:01:11+00:00): BTW,  way/29240550 now is only for pedestrian use, no cars at all. And I'm almost sure way/25585667 way/29240527 and way/947049340 are closed to the traffic. Everything is in the works and maybe can change in the next months, until the definitive works get done.
World_Winner (2025-11-12 09:14:30+00:00): Hi Ismael Olea, 

Thanks for your great feedback and sharing your local insights. I updated the map in changeset #174539766 based on your suggestions. Please take a look and let me know if they are OK.
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:35:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:35:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
bxl-forever (2025-11-05 09:55:56+00:00): Hello,

I am afraid there is a mistake here.

The reason we did not have "name:fr"="Cortenbergh" before is not that we forgot, it is because the official name set by the government is to use "Kortenberg" both in Dutch and in French.

https://www.ejustice.just.fgov.be/eli/arrete/1988/06/24/1988000115/justel

If you really want to use the alternative form, please consider "alt_name:fr"
bxl-forever (2025-11-12 10:49:48+00:00): ## REVERTED CHANGESET
Changed into old_name:fr=Cortenbergh
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:37:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:38:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
NieWnen (2025-11-05 12:04:46+00:00): Co rozumiesz przez stołówkę ogólnodostępną? Każdy może z niej skorzystać o różnych porach, a nie tylko uczniowie w wyznaczonej godzinie?
Ben Dezar (2025-11-12 13:27:21+00:00): Jak chodziłem do szkoły to normalnie tylnym wejściem wchodzili ludzie i odbierali obiady.
bxl-forever (2025-11-12 10:48:22+00:00): ## REVERTED CHANGESET

Réthy is only the old name and was already tagged as "old_name:fr".

There is no dedicated French translation, it must stay as "Retie" in every language.

See official government decision here:
https://www.ejustice.just.fgov.be/eli/arrete/1988/06/24/1988000115/justel
joost schouppe (2025-11-06 11:05:12+00:00): Reverted, see osm.org/changeset/174266886
StC (2025-11-05 10:59:52+00:00): Bonjour,

à quoi correspond cette relation ? Qui en est l'opérateur et quelles sont vos sources ?
kräckel (2025-11-06 07:51:13+00:00): This is a collection of existing coastal paths. The operators and sources are listed in the respective route descriptions. This collection might encourage the mapping of a continuous route.
StC (2025-11-07 13:07:02+00:00): Hi,

the general OSM policy is against collections. The rationale is that there are other ways to obtain the same result (e.g. an Overpass Turbo request).

More to the point, the local policy for hiking routes is to map only those routes (or networks) that are signposted as such and/or published by official authorities. There may come a time when Sentier du Littoral is documented as a hiking route, but we are far from it.
pyrog (2025-11-09 08:43:24+00:00): Sorry @kräckel,
But this collection broke the rendering of routes in WMT.
Your changeset broke also the "logic" of the structure of national routes.

I suggest not only to remove it, but revert all this changeset.

Best regards,
Yves — Groupe OSM Plein Air
kräckel (2025-11-09 09:40:05+00:00): Hi Yves, 
yes please revert it - thanks for you advice.
Thx
NieWnen (2025-11-05 11:56:15+00:00): Punkt został umiejscowiony na ścianie między budynkami, a raczej jest to mało realne żeby tam był ten mural?
Marek-M (2025-11-05 13:06:32+00:00): Hej, Obrońców Pokoju 2 jest budynkiem 3 kondygnacyjnym `building:levels=3`, Sienkiewicza 1 ma 1 kondygnację `building:levels=1`. Mural może być zrobiony na wyższej ścianie
NieWnen (2025-11-05 15:34:04+00:00): Faktycznie,
 nie zwróciłem uwagi na różnice poziomów budynków, a patrzyłem na sam diff punktu.

Nawet znalazłem jaki to: 
https://klubglobtroterawarszawa.com/2024/06/01/od-barbarzyncow-do-arystokratow-spacer-z-przewodnikiem-po-pruszkowie/

https://klubglobtroterawarszawa.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/pruszkow-mural.jpeg
Ben Dezar (2025-11-06 10:27:08+00:00): Mural jest na ścianie wyższego budynku. Przepraszam, że nie dodałem do budynku ale nie wiedziałem czy tak wolno robic ;)
joost schouppe (2025-11-06 11:04:48+00:00): Reverted, see osm.org/changeset/174266886
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:35:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
mavl (2025-11-14 07:30:58+00:00): Здравствуйте. Подскажите, пожалуйста, информация для тегов 
lit и surface тоже берётся с сервиса "Страва"?
joost schouppe (2025-11-06 11:04:26+00:00): Reverted, see osm.org/changeset/174266886
nevw (2025-11-05 07:51:23+00:00): Treadmill is normally spelt with two ll’s but you have spelt with one l.
Is it as intended?
george1201 (2025-11-19 22:45:11+00:00): Hallo söm4324,
was hat dich veranlasst die Baustelle zu löschen und dort zwei Gebäude hinzusetzen? Das Areal w777465752 ist weiterhin von einem Bauzaun umgeben. Gebäude gibt es dort auch keine. Dieses  Foto https://up.picr.de/50289195ft.jpg habe ich heute vom SW-Ende Richtung NO aufgenommen.
söm4324 (2025-11-20 09:52:18+00:00): Hallo george1201,
die ehemals eingezeichnete Baustelle ist ca. 5 Jahre alt gewesen, aber alle Luftbilder zeigen an dieser Stelle keine Baustelle, sondern zwei Gebäude. Selbst wenn ich kurz bei der Konkurrenz schaue, zeigt Google angeblich Bilder von 2025, aber mit den Gebäuden. Es gab also keinen Hinweis, dass diese Baustelle noch existiert.
Aufgrund deines Bildes hab ich die Baustelle wieder eingezeichnet und die Gebäude als abgerissen markiert:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174898240
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174898394
george1201 (2025-11-20 10:21:53+00:00): Die Gebäude waren simple Baucontainer, wie man sie auf jeder Baustelle findet.
Ein Revert deiner Änderung hätte ich besser gefunden, dann hätte man weiterhin sehen können, dass die Baustelle schon 5 Jahre existiert. Jetzt bekommt man den Eindruck, sie wäre gerade errichtet worden, nach dem Abriss zweier Gebäude.
george1201 (2025-11-20 23:19:12+00:00): Ich habe den ursprünglichen Zustand mit CS 174927748 wieder hergestellt.
söm4324 (2025-11-21 08:15:06+00:00): Ok, danke
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:37:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:36:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
aixbrick (2025-11-05 13:14:01+00:00): Danke :-)
Frans S (2025-11-11 09:56:30+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
A: Inaccurate mapping. 

B: Overlapping buildings.

E: Buildings not squared or rounded.
G: Included the shadow of the building.



Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174227118
arjunaraoc (2025-11-26 15:20:05+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175159314#map=19/16.495363/80.402489
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174227238
Samwel Kyando (2025-11-19 08:21:59+00:00): hello thank you for your mapping , you mapped few empty space as building, i fixed them .
eggie (2025-11-05 08:16:43+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  Ik heb een companytag toegevoegd.. anders geen effect in OSM.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-11-05 08:27:56+00:00): Lion,
Volgens het Kadaster bestaat dit nummer (nog) niet. Je zou een terugmelding kunnen doen.
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/?searchQuery=Kerkstraat+47+wolvega&objectId=0098200000024046&theme=BRT+Achtergrond&geometry.x=195945.5766129074&geometry.y=543567.8244199031&zoomlevel=14.56

Alleen een naam doet niets in OSM. Ook de aard van het bedrijf toevoegen. 
Ik heb amenity=events_venue toegevoegd.

MVG
eggie
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:38:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
Yog Sot (2025-11-05 16:11:27+00:00): nie ma żadnego uzasadnienia, aby akurat t droga była najwąniejsza, a nie równoległa na połnoc, a to biorąc pod uwagę, że jest A4, które to winno być stosowane do tranzytu, a nie drogi prowadzoce prez środki miejscowości. 

Wycofaj to, zastopuj swoje zmiany. Głosowanie jest poddane pod wątpliwość. 

Dobrze o tym wiesz.
theDM (2025-11-05 16:27:43+00:00): Przeczytaj listę dróg do podniesienia, DK 52 była na tej liście i jest w TEN-T.
To, że ci się coś nie podoba i kwestionujesz głosowanie, gdzie przed głosowaniem ustalono jego zasady i wyłoniono nową definicję trunka, jeszcze nie oznacza, żeby cofać przegłosowane zmiany. 
Ta trasa akurat nie budziła większych zastrzeżeń.
PS. Na stronie Komisji Europejskiej i Ministerstwa Infrastruktury, oprócz DK 52, jest też DK 62.
https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/tentec-maps/web/public/screen/home
https://www.gov.pl/web/infrastruktura/transeuropejska-siec-transportowa--ten-t
Yog Sot (2025-11-05 22:30:53+00:00): AI Overview
Nie, droga krajowa nr 52 (DK52) nie została jeszcze w całości ukończona jako część sieci TEN-T, ponieważ wciąż trwają prace nad jej modernizacją, zwłaszcza na odcinkach, które mają stać się drogami ekspresowymi. 

Nie mapujemy planów, tylko stan faktyczny. 

DK52 nie będzie drogą ekspresową, bo ta zostanie zbudowana w innej lokalizacji. 

No ale wiem, że masz to gdzieś, bo co cię interesuje, że jest inaczej ni chcesz.
theDM (2025-11-05 22:47:47+00:00): AI Overview wyznacznikiem?
Status ekspresówki nie jest wymagany, żeby droga zaliczała się do sieci TEN-T.
Podlinkowałem Ci mapy ze strony Komisji Europejskiej i Ministerstwa Infrastruktury jako dodatkową podstawę.
Ja się nie upieram przy sztywnie na tym, co przeszło i sam nieco inaczej widzę trunka, zwłaszcza docelowo, ale wygrało to, co jest. DK 52 kwalifikuje się pod wybraną definicję trunk czy się nam to podoba, czy nie.
milet (2025-11-05 16:41:51+00:00): Hallo, gibt es für die Datenquelle eine explizite Erlaubnis zur Nutzung in OSM? Ich konnte im Wiki dazu nichts finden. CC BY 4.0 Daten sind nicht ohne weiteres nutzbar.
user_5359 (2025-11-10 09:25:52+00:00): Hallo! Bitte sieh Dir die Daten von https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2fdP an. Was ist die Bedeetung von den Schlüsseln
 gemeindenr 
krg_city
krg_diss
krg_diss_i
? Der Schlüssel de:amtlicher_gemeindeschluessel
 ist Dir bekannt, oder?
tux67 (2025-11-05 09:08:26+00:00): Hallo FETKopp,

bitte nicht jeden Gebäudeteil nach dem Streetcomplete fragt mit einem Duplikat der Hausnummer versehen.
Adressen gibt es bei OSM nur ein mal (ausser in Kombination mit einem POI).
In Viersen werden die Hausnummern als Node im Hauptgebäude vom Kartasteramt gepflegt.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1734502030

Danke & Gruß
tux67
JasonBob (2025-11-06 00:39:28+00:00): Hello, I spent a lot of time updating the roads in this area due to the completion of the Terminal 1 project. This was based on ground surveys and updated imagery. Your edits appear to have changed many roads based on much older aerial imagery. Could you please revert this entire edit and all other edits done in this area?
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:36:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
eserte (2025-11-12 13:04:36+00:00): Hallo Emil,

auch diesen Changeset musste ich rückgängig machen.

-- Slaven
eserte (2025-11-12 21:14:52+00:00): Aktuelle Bilder:
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&pKey=1385807306242853&x=0.3788&y=0.4588&zoom=0.0000
oba510 (2025-11-23 10:17:00+00:00): Hi, fyi you broke the member ordering on the bus route relations here when you split the way. (it's been fixed)
eggie (2025-11-05 09:20:03+00:00): Dag Paul,

De scripts van LiveNav zijn ons niet bekend. Ik weet dus niet of emergency=yes gaat helpen om de oneway=yes te overrulen.

Normaal gesproken zou de tagging dan moeten zijn:
oneway:emergency=no  conform de manier waarop we uitzonderingen toevoegen.

Ga dus na bij LiveNav wat te doen bij oneway=yes in uitzonderingsgevallen.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-11-05 09:13:52+00:00): Dag Loud Flag..

Goed bezig, maar neem svp de moeite om concreet aan te geven met wat je aan het doen bent.
Leusden zegt niemand iets. 

MVG
eggie
emvee (2025-11-13 07:32:53+00:00): Hoi,

In OpenStreetMap worden namen niet gebruikt voor omschrijvingen en volgende naam die je op de winkel/het apparaat kan zien.

"Leusden" aan de naam toevoegen is dus niet de bedoeling, net zoals Intergamma en Poelman.

Groeten,

Emvee
emvee (2025-11-15 12:28:53+00:00): name terug gezet in:

https://osmcha.org/changesets/174682160
Loud Flag (2025-11-15 15:56:59+00:00): Super, zal ik meenemen emvee! Geeft soms wel moeilijkheden met dingen als de Bibliotheek Leusden bijvoorbeeld.
emvee (2025-11-15 18:10:00+00:00): 👍
Frans S (2025-11-05 12:51:37+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
When you see an object what seems to be a building, check if there is a shadow. Otherwise, it is not a building.
Best regards and keep mapping
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:35:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
旧加卷 (2026-02-01 00:34:32+00:00): way/649717669 is not a bridge
Peter_Otp (2026-02-02 12:44:57+00:00): Добрый день! Скажите пожалуйста, а через ручей Серебристая в лесу в районе Заходского действительно мостик есть? Я просто в сентябре 2025 вечером как то подходил к этому ручью с запада и в этом месте (где просека подходит) мостика не нашел и пошел на юг через лес в сторону дороги))
tux67 (2025-11-05 14:04:21+00:00): Hallo mstester,

bitte nicht jeden Gebäudeteil nach dem Streetcomplete fragt mit einem Duplikat der Hausnummer versehen.
Adressen gibt es bei OSM nur ein mal (außer in Kombination mit einem POI).
Die Hausnummern sind hier als Node im Hauptgebäude  gepflegt.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11303193691

Danke & Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174233105
Langlaeufer (2026-01-10 17:17:50+00:00): cycleway:oneway bezieht sich auch auf die digitalisierrichtung der Straße. Linke Radweg sind in der Regel nur entgegen der Digitalisierrichtung zu befahren. für sie gilt dann als cycleway:oneway=-1 (dies ist auch der Default-value) eine Erfassung kann also einfach unterbleiben. cycleway:(left/both:)oneway ist hingegen meist falsch!
Frans S (2025-11-05 10:26:44+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. However, Map more accurate and square each rectangular building with the Q key while selected.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174233362
Frans S (2025-11-05 10:38:07+00:00): A remark
Please map more accurate, don't include the shadow and square each rectangular building.
Brown/gray buildings and round buildings ought to be mapped as well.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174233362
Frans S (2025-11-05 10:38:08+00:00): A remark
Please map more accurate, don't include the shadow and square each rectangular building.
Brown/gray buildings and round buildings ought to be mapped as well.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174233362
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-06 18:24:17+00:00): thanks for a fix!
NeisBot (2025-11-05 10:33:54+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisBot (2025-11-05 10:33:54+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Prepshop voor noodpakket en survival artikelen"
eggie (2025-11-05 13:36:21+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
tz09 (2025-11-05 15:10:44+00:00): Dank! Ik dacht dezelfde beschrijving als Google Maps te gebruiken maar zal het aanpassen naar een meer algemene beschrijving ipv wervend.

--

Thanks for your comments! I assumed I could use the same description as Google Maps but understand now that it should be different. I will adapt the description to be more neutral.
spiregrain (2025-11-05 13:24:15+00:00): Generally looks good, and a few spot-checks didn't find any errors.  But there are a few teeth missing in this smile.  Why do you think (for example) - way/971379363 wasn't touched?  (Many such cases)   The outline is squarely within the cadastral, and the UPRN location is dead centre too (per https://osm.mathmos.net/addresses/uprn/ )
rskedgell (2025-11-05 14:13:43+00:00): I'm not quite sure why 42 Osborne Road was filtered out by one of the SQL stages. I'll take a look at that next time I'm in all day and can run each step one at a time and see why that happened.

There will be other gaps because the script which processes the OSM XML file halts at 100 features or 10 postcodes, whichever comes first.

The main aim of this is to get as many missing postcodes into OSM as I can, so I won't worry too much about gaps now.