piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NorthCrab_upload (2025-09-23 14:50:55+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/80664992

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
AndyB_66 (2025-09-23 14:48:38+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
NorthCrab_upload (2025-09-23 15:00:47+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13165378071
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13165378072
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13165378073
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13165378074
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13165378075
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/488414440
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/984507623

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
user_5359 (2025-09-24 08:48:22+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/11738825354 more than 100 meters. Please check the correct position
NeisBot (2025-09-23 15:00:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-09-28 10:18:16+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/172349769
sorcrosc (2025-09-23 16:27:27+00:00): Ciao. Sembra che tu stia importando i numeri civici dal portale del comune.
Hai notato la licenza d'uso?
https://www.comune.fano.pu.it/Servizi/Consultare-il-sistema-cartografico
pwbriggs (2025-09-24 06:09:12+00:00): Thank you for your concern about the local environment. However, deleting a trail in OpenStreetMap is unfortunately not the correct way to address this issue.

Is this trail publicly owned/operated (i.e. managed by the local government), or is this private property? Depending on the situation on the ground, there may be better ways to help this issue.

Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F for more information.

Thank you for your cooperation.
NeisBot (2025-09-23 15:07:10+00:00): Hi Wendy Vásquez, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Updated residential areas and city block details, adjusted geometry and removed outdated landuse tags"
citrula (2025-09-24 08:06:44+00:00): welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contribution. Please don't add descriptive names like "3207 Whitehall" - that information is already present with the address tags
Tatfahren (2025-09-24 04:03:20+00:00): Und abgerissen wurde es auch?
dmehlhorn (2025-09-24 09:25:17+00:00): Nein es wir nur nicht mehr vermietet als Ferienhaus.
Tatfahren (2025-09-24 10:39:42+00:00): Weil du gleich das gesamte das gesamte Gebäude gelöscht hast. Dann stelle ich das wieder her.
dmehlhorn (2025-09-25 09:10:40+00:00): Dankeschön!
Tatfahren (2025-09-25 12:49:17+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172438897
k8ieone (2025-09-23 15:29:35+00:00): Maybe restaurant or cafe is a better category, I wasn't sure what to pick.
custodiankeyy (2025-09-23 19:52:18+00:00): Kaldırım mı eklemeye çalıştınız? Eklediğiniz yol ne yolu?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1432320649
Gohikan (2025-09-24 11:30:31+00:00): Aslında kaldırım değil, anayolun kenarı.
Ayrılmış bir yürüyüş alanı da değil. Yayaların yürümesine imkan veren tek şey şerit çizgisinin dışında kalması.
custodiankeyy (2025-09-24 18:55:07+00:00): Buradaki yolun -özellikle living_street kısmının- kaldırılması gerektiğini düşünüyorum. Dediğiniz gibi orası aslında caddeye bağlı ve yolu ayıran fiziksel bir şey bulunmamakta.
Gohikan (2025-09-25 06:30:48+00:00): Evet söylediğiniz doğru. Yaptığım eklemeyi kaldırdım.
user_18023081 (2025-09-24 09:58:59+00:00): Define "moderator"
Balih00! (2025-09-24 17:45:14+00:00): @jmarchon
user_18023081 (2025-09-27 20:20:37+00:00): Nobody is a moderator on OSM, that's just a random guy
osmviborg (2025-09-24 06:35:03+00:00): Hej. Hvis et adressepunkt er fejlplaceret, så skal du gøre Egedal Kommune opmærksom på problemet. Det er et kommunalt ansvar at placeret punktet korrekt. OSM henter automatisk adressepunkterne, og opdaterer dagligt, fra Danmarks Adresser.
citrula (2025-09-25 20:06:35+00:00): alt_name is used for a different name used to refer to this specific feature - I don't really think that applies here. Nobody says "Austin" when they are referring to Jollyville specifically. Austin is already represented well on OSM by this relation

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/113314
silly_goose (2025-09-23 20:37:00+00:00): still exists, i'll restore and fix it :)
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-09 09:52:05+00:00): Hello!

You used
mtb:scale=1+-
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/518886898/history

Have you maybe meant
mtb:scale=1
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
yelisey90 (2025-09-23 22:37:28+00:00): Hmmm... Should cycleway:width in this case mean the width of the whole way (cycleway+footway), or just the width of the segregated cycleway?
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2025-09-24 06:11:45+00:00): Merhaba. Otoparkın içindeki yolu, sadece otopark dışında kalacak şekilde değiştirmişsiniz. Otoparkların içindeki park yollarını lütfen kaldırmayınız. 

Sadece otoparka giriş için kullanılan yollar highway=service ile, otopark içindeki park yolları highway=service+service=parking_aisle ile etiketlenmeli. Park içi yolların nasıl etiketleneceği konusunda örnekler şu sayfada yer alıyor. Bkz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Dparking_aisle

İyi günler.
limes11 (2025-09-23 18:04:58+00:00): Hi

are these via_ferrata_scale's correct ?

scale 3- and sac_scale T3 does not seem comparable.

Thanks
sakudo (2025-09-23 20:11:42+00:00): Agreed. - I only changed highway=path to highway=via_ferrata. The conflicting keys (ferrata scale 3- and SAC scale T3) were already there.

After a little research, I have the impression that the core part of Hindelanger Klettersteig ends 200 m NE of Gratkopf (border T4-T3), see https://www.ok-bergbahnen.com/aktiv-sport/klettersteige/hindelanger-klettersteig.html

However, many more highways are labeled as the Hindelanger Klettersteig (leading almost to the Heubatspitze).

To complicate things further, we have also a relation 1422977 labelled "Hindelanger Klettersteig".

I think, the via_ferrata_scale should be removed from all segments beyond the point NE of Grafkopf, leaving only T3 (and from the relation).

I am not familiar with this area. Shall I proceed with this or open a hint on OSM for someone local to clarfify?
ARandomThumbtack_Import (2025-09-23 16:12:33+00:00): I messed up the comment name (sobs), this is actually "EdinburghSpeedvale-VictoriaEramosa" but I don't believe I can update the changeset name to reflect that.
matteobott (2025-09-23 16:36:47+00:00): Typo via vettabbia
muralito (2025-09-23 18:14:08+00:00): Hola. Mirá que no hay generadora en Maldonado, dejo de funcionar hace tiempo.
Enock4seth (2025-09-23 19:05:36+00:00): Hi, building should represent the footprint of the building and name should be the name that is known. What is TTBTN ?
3xp10r3r (2025-10-14 13:02:34+00:00): The information I have is incomplete so I have removed it, sorry about that.
NeisBot (2025-09-23 16:56:47+00:00): Hi elaine32, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Added buildings with residential houses and adjusted geometry"
StC (2025-09-24 10:23:52+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire de randonnée qui passe par là, en supprimant un pont. Erreur ? Disparition du pont sur le terrain ? Et dans ce cas, où passe l'itinéraire désormais ?

Par ailleurs, des commentaires plus utiles seraient appréciés, cela aiderait à comprendre l'intention derrière les changements.
foehn (2025-09-26 16:00:39+00:00): Bonjour,
Oui le pont est cassé. il y a un nouvel itinéraire validé par la Fédération Française de Randonnée et balisé sur le terrain. Je m'occupe de la mise à jour aujou'd'hui. Merci beaucoup pour votre vigilance.
Cordialement,
StC (2025-09-26 19:26:56+00:00): Super, merci !
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-24 17:02:46+00:00): reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410  and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969  remain not answered

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173727726
RGBmap (2025-09-23 17:02:54+00:00): Também modifiquei o local do Fab LAB que estava de forma errada no prédio D, ele fica no prédio C, nomeado prédio B, alterado as duas construções em cima do campo da FACENS de casas (Que não são) para escritórios de universidade
RGBmap (2025-09-23 17:53:47+00:00): Agora que vi que tem outras imagens de satélite para a edição, qual vocês indicam? Fiz na padrão do BING, mas alterando para outras os prédios ficam em posição ligeiramente diferentes
NeisBot (2025-09-23 17:06:53+00:00): Hi Nicolás Jimenez Blanco, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Updated residential buildings and addresses, adjusted geometry and various details"
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-10-17 20:02:47+00:00): Hello, why did you create a tertiary road (Discovery Bluff) that doesn't link to any tertiary (or higher) roads?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-24 17:02:27+00:00): reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410  and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969  remain not answered

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173727712
NeisBot (2025-09-23 17:24:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-09-28 10:16:37+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/172559463
EneaSuper (2025-09-24 12:12:32+00:00): Hi, sorry to bother you, but I seriously doubt the name is in German. Why did you write it in that language?
Marek-M (2025-09-23 18:28:34+00:00): Cześć, jeżeli jest to droga dla rowerów ale piesi mogą się po niej poruszać (brak innej drogi dla pieszych), to tag `foot=yes` jest bardziej poprawny.
stasiu512 (2025-09-23 21:36:50+00:00): Z tego co wiem, to ta droga rowerowa dalej jest w budowie, trzeba sprawdzić jak jest oznakowana, aktualne tagowanie na pewno nie jest w porządku
wronman (2025-09-24 11:48:27+00:00): Ja taguję na podstawie tego, co widzę własnymi oczami.
Ta droga jest już oddana do użytku. Wiem, bo nią szedłem.
Przy wejściach na tą drogę znajdują się znaki nakazu kombinacja C-13/C-16 o poziomej kresce, czyli droga dla pieszych i rowerów bez podziału. Tą drogą idą piesi, oraz jadą rowery, na równych prawach.
Jeśli chcecie, to w wolnym czasie znowu tam pójdę, zrobię zdjęcia i Wam podeślę do oceny.
Nie wiem, czy na podstawie tych informacji foot=yes jest poprawny.
Jestem początkujący, więc jeśli coś zepsułem, to przepraszam :)

Pozdrawiam
Marek-M (2025-09-24 12:03:23+00:00): Zepsute nic nie jest, tylko wymaga dopracowania. Ten typ DDPiR tagujemy w taki sposób:
```
highway=path
bicycle=designated
foot=designated
segregated=no
```
(zgodnie z wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Rowery#Drogi_dla_pieszych_i_rower%C3%B3w). Poprawiłem tą drogę w CS: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172390452
Hufkratzer (2025-09-24 20:12:05+00:00): Hi,
If https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1432353596 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1432353607 are riding arenas (that probably belong to the ranch https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9920692755) the shouldn't be tagged with leisure=horse_riding but with leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian. Example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13077942013#map=19/43.107343/6.135517&layers=P

Traduction automatique :

Bonjour,
Si https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1432353596 et https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1432353607 sont des manèges (qui appartiennent probablement au ranch https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9920692755) elles ne devraient pas être marquées avec leisure=horse_riding mais avec leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian. Exemple : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13077942013#map=19/43.107343/6.135517&layers=P
krt16s (2025-09-24 21:09:12+00:00): Hi,

thanks for pointing this out. Fixed in change set 172412881.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-09-23 19:51:58+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1424857789

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Dominik Szymański (2025-09-24 08:32:20+00:00): Masz rację! Użyłem po prostu pola "Adres", wzorując się na blokach 74 i 73, nie zauważyłem, że wypełniło to pole addr:street, a nie addr:place (nawet nie miałem świadomości, że takie istnieją). Już poprawiam!
A67-A67 (2025-09-23 20:45:27+00:00): Dit fietspad stond al op de kaart. In deze wijziging wordt het fietspad nogmaals ingetekend over het bestaande fietspad en vastgeplakt aan een gasleiding.

Ik heb deze wijziging teruggedraaid.
7tonin (2025-09-23 18:11:31+00:00): Étant donné que la source d’images panoramax montre toujours l’atelier, je me suis permis de laisser un nœud avec un préfixe was:

https://api.panoramax.xyz/?focus=pic&map=20.76/45.7514/4.84138&pic=f0dfbc4a-12a7-42c8-af2f-f1c9ad64b27f&speed=250&theme=default&xyz=37.70/0.65/30
SomeoneElse (2025-09-25 20:23:52+00:00): Hello,
It looks like the edit to https://osm.mapki.com/history/way/40971828 that removed https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/385557097 from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/40971828 introduced a gap in NCN67 at https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/357215#map=20/53.3559866/-1.3857217&layers=H .
Clearly it's possible to cross the road on foot here, so I'd add at least a footpath here (with a kerb on it if there is one).  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/303553186 is a similar one that I did locally to me a while back.
Best Regards,
Andy
CanopyFalls (2025-10-08 05:01:19+00:00): Hello Andy!
Thank you for catching this! I think I got distracted midway through adding pavement here. I've connected this up and added a marked crossing further down the road:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172985323

I want to survey this area more on foot and upload imagery to Mappillary before changing too much else due to the tree cover so I've left the footpath connections across the road even though they're incorrect. Lemme know if there's anything else that needs adding or changing!
SomeoneElse (2025-10-09 00:14:36+00:00): Well if there's a kerb on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1435651892 that's worth mapping.
I've connected the relation up https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/357215#map=19/53.356102/-1.386084 - if someone was cycling northe or south along that I'm guessing that they'd have to get off the bike, push it across the road, and then get on at the other side?
CanopyFalls (2025-10-09 00:39:04+00:00): That would be my guess. These cycle routes like NCN67 seem a little pointless. They often just kick cyclists out into roads with little to no notice and I don't know if it's worth actually keeping them mapped. This one here doesn't even have a lowered kerb for cyclists if memory serves me correctly. You're expected to just kinda wing it to get onto Stone Lane.
Thank you for repairing the relationship!
earlyistimeless (2025-09-24 00:34:25+00:00): Hé Jeroen, ik zie dat je de path in de tunnel terug hebt gezet naar een footway. Werkt de fiets routing dan nog wel over dit stuk?
earlyistimeless (2025-09-24 01:03:25+00:00): Ah, de bicycle dismount zorgt daar zeker voor.
JeroenHoek (2025-09-24 06:03:30+00:00): Precies. Je mag daar alleen met een fiets komen (G13), en in het tunneltje moet je verplicht afstappen. Het is een voetgangerstunnel.
JeroenHoek (2025-09-24 06:05:15+00:00): Routers die niets met bicycle=dismount doen lopen daar toch al vast vanwege de highway=steps. Doorgaans levert dit geen probleem op (en anders is het een bug in de navigatiesoftware).
earlyistimeless (2025-09-24 18:11:36+00:00): Ah, inderdaad. Dan is dit situatie getrouwer, met praktisch geen verschil. Ik moet dit meer zien als een uitzondering voor fietsers op een voetpad. Niet als een algemeen pad met voor fietsers extra voorwaarden; wat ik in eerste instantie deed. Dan is dat ook weer helder, bedankt!
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-09-24 21:18:09+00:00): Hello, why did you classify the "Rock Peak" road as secondary? It's completely disconnected from all other secondary (or higher) roads.
Ed_slv (2025-10-03 13:09:49+00:00): Boas
A barragem do Caia não é totalmente em betão. è uma barragem mista, parte em terra  (a zona mais larga) e a outra parte é que é em betão
https://cnpgb.apambiente.pt/content/caia
dmfr (2025-10-03 13:18:56+00:00): Obrigado pela informação! Vou trocar o material para material=concrete;soil. O ideal até seria mapear cada parte da barragem individualmente, com material=concrete e material=soil.
zabop (2025-09-23 21:19:47+00:00): Please use meaningful changeset comments. "Q" on its own does not seem to be meaningful. If I'm missing something, please enlighten me.
NeisBot (2025-09-23 18:30:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-09-28 10:16:00+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/172381432
Gregory Peony (2025-09-24 01:39:25+00:00): I think the northern most footprint here represents two buildings. Overall the buildings you mapped are aqurate but please exclude the shadow they cast from their size. See how I mapped these in https://osmcha.org/changesets/172370145 --- Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172358377
NeisBot (2025-09-23 18:39:34+00:00): Hi Sepiver, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 34 highway(s)
- 1 natural(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=172358863
Sepiver (2025-09-23 19:18:23+00:00): Yes this was intentional
AndyB_66 (2025-09-23 19:20:30+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
Walter Łuszczyk (2025-09-23 19:27:35+00:00): eh, kurde, faktycznie wtopa z mojej strony, nie widzę możliwości zmiany tego opisu, następnym razem już się dostosuję; dzięki za uwagę
AndyB_66 (2025-09-23 19:29:35+00:00): Świetnie - społeczność OSM będzie Ci wdzięczna za poinformowanie, co dodałeś, zmieniłeś lub usunąłeś.
Gregory Peony (2025-09-24 01:32:45+00:00): Good job improving upon your interpretation, by recognising that you had mapped two buildings with one footprint. You knew the history of this feature since you mapped it, but just so you know, whenever working with other people's edits you should generally modify them. Objects should only be deleted if they do not exist. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172359330
gormo (2025-09-24 21:37:41+00:00): Die Einrichtung ist erst geplant; siehe https://www.haz.de/lokales/hannover/verwaltungsgericht-stadt-hannover-darf-obdachlosenunterkunft-im-zooviertel-bauen-2V4N4XLCO5FATNB2IQVCJUBWII.html . Habe entsprechend umgetaggt.
osmmapper222 (2025-09-24 21:54:55+00:00): Danke für die Anpassung.
Gregory Peony (2025-09-23 21:38:20+00:00): Welcome to OSM. Generally you identified buildings here, but you mapped two pairs of buildings that share common nodes. Please consider the roof shape and shadows of buildings to determine where one building ends and another begins. If you cannot determine, then it's safer to assume they're seperate. 

Please do not connect the corners of buildings to other buildings or features such as highways or residential areas. In the iD Editor, hold down the `Alt` key to prevent your cursor from snapping to existing data and accidentally creating shared(grey) nodes. This [video about connected nodes](https://youtu.be/ltn1VOiq5_0) has more information and a guide.

Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/