piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2026-03-25 10:36:51+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 8 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/87321823 v18 | 5 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180400323
rarad74 (2026-03-25 10:49:48+00:00): He uses an old imagery set - BINg which is over 15 years old here in Romania. This guy is mock us. He not listen to what we try to tell/teach him.
rarad74 (2026-03-25 10:54:05+00:00): He wrongly reposition tracks and other elements using an old imagery.
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-25 10:56:53+00:00): @rarad74 Thanks for your feedback. I just created a DWG report ...
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-25 11:00:10+00:00): Dear @ANdurtzu

when updating OSM please leave useful changeset comment: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Thanks.
rarad74 (2026-03-25 11:01:48+00:00): I tryied to contact him on order to tell/ teach him what imagery set to use, to add valid comments and to not draw alot of land poligons which does not represent anything in  reality. Even in the private residential courtyards he drawed poligons which didnt match with reality.
007Transformer (2026-03-26 11:34:58+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:180449366
Joerg Fischer (2026-04-04 06:54:48+00:00): Kannst Du mir vielleicht erklären was das soll? Wann bist Du das letzte Mal vor Ort gewesen? Direkt vor Deinem Revert kann es ja nicht gewesen sein, denn sonst hättest Du gesehen dass der Radweg fertig ist und rege benutzt wird. Das ist komplett unabhängig davon was in einem Terminkalender steht. Gemappt wird, und das ist seit Jahren gute Praxis, die tatsächliche Lage vor Ort. Was Du als langjähriger Mapper auch wissen solltest? Toll, dass Du das Routing an der Stelle für den Bikerouter (und für OsmAnd für einen ganzen Monat) zerstört hast. Ansonsten hätte ich es mindestens für sozial und höflich gehalten, wenn Du das an meinem Änderungssatz zunächst diskutiert hättest, so wie ich es jetzt gerade bei Dir versuche. Wir können uns auch gerne vor Ort treffen und das dort gemeinsam anschauen.
cyankahly (2026-04-04 07:55:18+00:00): Ich fahre die Strecke jeden Tag, soviel zu dem Thema ich solle es mir vor Ort anschauen.

Dabei wäre dir auch aufgefallen, dass die Strecke offiziell durch Baken noch gesperrt ist. (Welche jedoch illlegalerweise ständig besiete geschoben werden). Weiterhin sind tagsüber noch Bauarbeiten auf der Strecke, somit ist sie noch nicht fertig. Gerade wenn noch Bauarbeiten stattfinden und die Strecke noch abgesperrt ist, kann sie nicht als fertig eingetragen werden, denk auch Mal an Familien mit Kindern.
Und ich glaube nicht, dass das Routing zerstört ist, das bestehende Routing wie vorher funktioniert ja dennoch, nur der Weg wird nicht mit einbezogen.
Falls du dir die Mühe Mal machen solltest, schau dir Mal das Stück auf Lugauer Seite an, das ist im Dezember freigegeben wurden und der Mapper hat auch nur bis zum Bauzaun die Strecke eingetragen.

Solange da noch Zäune stehen und Arbeiten stattfinden, kann das noch nicht als fertig angesehen werden.
Joerg Fischer (2026-04-05 16:46:16+00:00): Du fährst die Strecke selbst jeden Tag, schreibst aber dass die gleiche Strecke nicht fertig ist. Kommt Dir das nicht irgendwie.... lustig vor?

Du behauptest das "illegalerweise" die Absperrungen entfernt werden obwohl Du täglich _siehst_ dass sie gar nicht wieder hingestellt wurden, weil, sie seit 2 Wochen völlig identisch da stehen?

Du fährst da jeden Tag lang, siehst zwangsläufig, dass da jede Menge Familien und Kinder fahren, und führst Familien und Kinder als Argument an? Kommt Dir das nicht schon wieder... lustig vor?

Ich war heute nochmal dort. Es gibt keinerlei Schilder, die die Benutzung untersagen. Die ehemaligen Baustellenabsperrungen liegen seit mindestens 2 Wochen "vergesssen" dort herum.

Für mich sieht Dein Tun eher nach Reviergehabe aus. "Niemand darf Sachen anfassen, die ich vorher editiert habe!"

Und ich möchte Dir ganz ausdrücklich aus dem Wiki des Revert-Plugin zitieren: "Do not revert changes by other users without contacting them first in a polite way" sowie "The plugin is not intended for use in edit wars and destructive actions" 

Und eine "destructive action" war das mindestens. :-(

Angesichts all dessen möchte ich Dich bitten Deinen Revert zu überdenken bzw. ihn zu entfernen.
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-25 10:59:29+00:00): Hi,

when updating OSM please leave useful changeset comment: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Thanks.
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-25 19:10:22+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180401146
eggie (2026-03-25 11:20:38+00:00): Hi,
I merged your info with the present addressnode.
Greetz,
eggie
Taya_S (2026-03-25 12:19:00+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180404966
Taya_S (2026-03-25 12:24:49+00:00): Reverted in changeset/180404966
Dillen GJ (2026-04-05 08:40:03+00:00): Gebaseerd op infobron: https://www.ruimtelijkeplannen.nl/documents/NL.IMRO.0263.OV0029-VG01/i_NL.IMRO.0263.OV0029-VG01_0005.png, is het dan niet beter om residential om te zetten naar: Highway=service 	service=parking_aisle.
Met als reden dat het binnenplein overwegend in gericht is als parkeerplaats.
Dillen GJ (2026-04-05 08:46:34+00:00): Dus: Highway=construction
Construction=service
Construction:service=parking_aisle
Dillen GJ (2026-04-05 08:58:11+00:00): Voor nu
keesm (2026-04-05 13:15:13+00:00): Ik snap je gedachte/suggestie. Maar ik laat het voor nu even zo. Er komen woonhuizen, dus landuse wordt residential. Die weg behoort bij die residential area. Ook al komen er parkeerplekken voor de bewoners. Maar we wachten gewoon definitieve oplevering van de infrastructuur af om te beoordelen wat het wordt.
Dillen GJ (2026-04-06 06:21:19+00:00): Prima, goed plan
World_Winner (2026-03-26 11:32:23+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: 180449286
gurglypipe (2026-03-25 13:26:16+00:00): Hiya, thanks for the attention to detail you’re adding here.

I’ve had to undo your changes to the access tagging because they’re not quite correct — access=customers grants access to all transport types (including cars) to a way. foot=customers is the correct tagging for saying a footpath is for customer use only, and that’s how these paths were tagged already. :)

Any questions, just ask, happy to help if needed

(Revert done as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180407511)
Far Easedale resident (2026-03-25 14:00:49+00:00): Thank you, that's so cool that you noticed I'd made a mistake. I'm inexperienced at editing (as you probably guessed) so it's great to learn more.
IvanaŠokčević (2026-03-25 11:21:07+00:00): Changed source:hgv tag later, added the wrong link; fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180402255 #OptimoRoute
SomeoneElse2 (2026-03-26 22:07:38+00:00): Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11017#map=19/56.735810/-3.770417 is a tiny piece of NCN7 left on the military road - is that deliberate?
It might be useful to use http://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeMap?relationId=11017 to look at NCN7 .
Best Regards,
Andy
Martinligabue (2026-05-20 15:10:15+00:00): no, è asfalto, non cemento

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182933134
Taya_S (2026-03-25 12:18:50+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180404966
Taya_S (2026-03-25 12:23:49+00:00): My apologies, this was not the changeset I meant to reply to. No data has been reverted by me here.
Robert Whittaker (2026-03-25 14:28:23+00:00): Are you sure https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13675065101 is a duplicate location? I don't see another GSF Car Parts object nearby in OSM.
Kovoschiz (2026-03-25 12:44:09+00:00): This isn't the vague `=chinese_folk` , but 3 well-defined religions together https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/三教合流
gurglypipe (2026-03-25 13:19:29+00:00): Heya, the public rights of way overlay still shows a public footpath heading north from Williams Way to Moss House Lane. Does it no longer exist, or has it been rerouted?

If it no longer exists it should probably be marked with a line on the map, tagged as:

designation=public_footpath
foot=designated
razed:highway=footway
note=Footpath no longer present on the ground March 2026

Otherwise someone’s going to accidentally add it back to the map in future as per the public rights of way overlay :)
gurglypipe (2026-03-26 12:17:34+00:00): I see you’ve updated it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180447381 to continue the footpath through. Thanks for that :)
NeisBot (2026-03-25 11:57:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 25 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/31693100 v10 | 13 crossings
https://osm.org/way/51935246 v9 | 12 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/662485057 v3

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180403751
iandees (2026-03-25 12:29:44+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/662485057 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180405394, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
Kovoschiz (2026-03-25 12:50:57+00:00): Again same here. `=school` means primary or secondary schools. `=university` should be used. But perhaps eg`=industrial`   can be considered for IC and the equipment. However worse, another problem I realized now is PolyU originally `amenity=college` , so most `building=unviersity` may need to be changed to  `building=college` + `building:use=university` properly. I will think about this.
Tomas Straupis (2026-03-25 12:27:13+00:00): Laba diena. Palei namus tai tikrai nėra amenity=parking, ten gi nėra ženklo „P“. Jei tokius žymėti, tai visi miestai mirgės margės „atseit parkingais“, taigi tokia informacija bus beprasmiška ir/ar klaidinga.
eggie (2026-03-25 12:25:51+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Alle begin is moeilijk. Niet name=.. gebruiken om zaken te verduidelijken. Die teksten horen niet op de kaart.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Tomas Straupis (2026-03-25 12:44:46+00:00): Vilniaus adresus mes sinchronizuojame pagal oficialią Vilniaus miesto savivaldybės informaciją. Atšaukiu pakeitimą.
eggie (2026-03-25 12:28:39+00:00): Beste Ineke.. Al eerder gevraagd . Niet name gebruiken om iets te beschrijven.
Dat zijn toch geen officiële geografische namen.

MVG
eggie
arjunaraoc (2026-06-29 09:08:11+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  Andhra Pradesh page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Andhra_Pradesh) and  join OSM Andhra Pradesh Telegram channel (https://t.me/osmandhra).  I am not sure about why you ticked Review request, as it is a simple feature.  Please use Review request flag when you are adding complex features and are not sure you did  a good job
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180404516
eggie (2026-03-25 12:27:43+00:00): Dag Ineke ,

Niet name gebruiken om iets te beschrijven Dat hoort niet als tekst op de kaart. Dat is hetzelfde als name=bankje name=boom
MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-03-25 12:32:21+00:00): Park met beschrijvingen name= verwijderd.
Er is een leisure=sports_centre  Daar kun je evt zaken aan toevoegen, maar niet name=
eggie (2026-03-25 12:35:26+00:00): name= is bij basisschool verwijderd. 

Svp geen plannen toevoegen aan OSM.
Dit is een kaart van het nu en heden.

Je kunt evt een eigen layer maken met al je eigen toevoegingen.
Bv met Umap
https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/nl/

Graag stoppen met dit soort toevoegingen aan OSM.
MVG
eggie
Ineke Sp (2026-03-25 14:03:17+00:00): Sorry Eggie, ik ben nieuw met OSM, ben ermee aan het experimenteren, dus weet te weinig ervan, dat blijkt maar weer.... Ik duik er wat beter in om je opmerkingen te voorkomen. Heb je een suggestie hoe OSM kan werken voor dummies? Dank groet, Ineke
eggie (2026-03-25 14:11:03+00:00): Dag Ineke,

We hadden ooit een zandbak voor dummies. Zal een zoeken of die nog bestaat.. en anders even op het forum vragen bij het draadje Korte vragen korte antwoorden.
Je kunt overigens gewoon iets uitproberen zolang je maar geen upload doet.
Mvg,
eggie
eggie (2026-03-25 14:33:48+00:00): Die zandbak even uitgeprobeerd, maar tot mijn schrik komen de toevoeingen gewoon in OSM terecht.
Je kunt het hier even vragen of zoiets nog bestaat.
Draadje Korte vragen (met hopelijk een kort antwoord)
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/nl/43

Groet,
eggie
eggie (2026-03-25 14:36:43+00:00): Hier nog een handleiding 

Lessen iD en JOSM
https://learnosm.org/nl_NL/beginner/
rempshaener (2026-03-25 21:28:05+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.
Ein paar kleine Anmerkungen zu deinen Ergänzungen:

- Du hast Farben angegeben, obwohl Unterflurhydraten in der Regel keine Farbe haben. Nur zur Klarstellung: Das ist die Farbe, die der Hydrant vor Ort hat. Das hat nichts mit der Darstellung in Karten oder Apps zu tun.
- In das Feld „ref“ gehört ausschließlich die Hydrantennummer.
- Die Nennweite wird in fire_hydrant:diameter eingetragen.
- name ist nur der echte Name, keine Beschreibung; das „Löschwasser“ bitte löschen.

Vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag und weiterhin viel Spaß beim Mappen.
Viele Grüße
SafwatHalaby (2026-03-26 06:53:54+00:00): Are you sure there is a roundabout here? It looks like just a wider portion in the street. No middle isle is visible in the imagery.
NumisK (2026-03-26 12:51:26+00:00): Hi SafwatHalaby, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you
NumisK (2026-03-28 09:10:38+00:00): Hi SafwatHalaby, thank you for your feedback. Upon review, I also see that I misinterpreted the situation based on GPS traces. It might be appropriate to keep the road’s normal alignment and add a node tagged as a turning circle at that location. Kindly share your thoughts on this approach.
SafwatHalaby (2026-04-19 10:03:22+00:00): I concur. This is certainly a turning circle.
NumisK (2026-04-28 10:10:44+00:00): Hi SafwatHalaby, thank you for confirming. I have updated the data accordingly.
SafwatHalaby (2026-07-03 16:22:39+00:00): Thank you!
ajmat (2026-03-26 05:11:29+00:00): Reverted in changeset id: 180436073
marc__marc (2026-03-26 09:41:37+00:00): Bonjour,
bienvenue et merci pour ces contributions
2 petites remarques :
le numéro de téléphone se renseigne au format international (avec le +32 à la place du 0 initial)
le nom concerne le nom réel de cet endroit, pas un mix de nom et description
vu que vous semblez avoir 11 sites, je pense que DB Accounting représente une marque (attribut brand dans le menu de gauche)
Cordialement,
Marc
DB Accounting (2026-04-09 09:07:43+00:00): Bonjour,
Je vous remercie pour votre message ainsi que pour les modifications que vous avez apportées.

J’ai effectué les adaptations de mon côté en suivant vos recommandations, notamment en ajoutant l’attribut « brand » afin de refléter correctement l’organisation de nos différents bureaux.

Bien à vous,
David
NeisBot (2026-03-25 12:45:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 26 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1341564314 v1 | 13 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1341564312 v1 | 13 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/4208589599 v4

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180405945
Wildsharky (2026-03-29 12:28:20+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:180440161
mueschel (2026-03-29 15:08:08+00:00): Hi,
could you check this node? It didn't get any valid tag:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13677945733
trial (2026-03-27 21:57:01+00:00): comme dit pas ailleurs autant préfixer les anciens usages plutôt que les supprimer.
old_name=Cordonnerie de Merville
was:craft=shoemaker

Il peut petre utile de savoir que le coordonnerie n'exiete plus plutôt que de la chercher ou de savoir qu'un magasin de cycle l'a remplacé.
MappingMore (2026-03-26 03:42:59+00:00): Revert of 180400105
spiregrain (2026-03-25 14:32:53+00:00): d'oh, good catch
ajmat (2026-03-26 04:33:44+00:00): Revert of 180355410
suzunote (2026-04-02 13:12:56+00:00): Hi, I fixed two things:
1. Address
addr:quarter=本町 -> delete
addr:neighbourhood=1丁目 -> addr:neighbourhood=本町一丁目

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:%E4%BD%8F%E6%89%80#%E6%97%A5%E6%9C%AC%E3%81%AE%E4%BD%8F%E6%89%80%E4%BD%93%E7%B3%BB(%E8%A1%97%E5%8C%BA%E7%95%AA%E5%8F%B7%E3%83%BB%E5%9C%B0%E7%B1%8D%E8%BB%A2%E7%94%A8)

2. Phone number
phone=022-***-**** -> phone=+81 22 *** ****

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Key:phone#%E6%97%A5%E6%9C%AC%E3%81%AE%E5%A0%B4%E5%90%88

I made these corrections based on the wiki.
I also added name:ja, name:ja-Hira, level, addr:housename, and shop=books since they sell books too. Thank you.
Kartoffolon (2026-05-07 22:59:49+00:00): Oh nice, thank you for the details : )
I'm fairly new to this.
aRGUM (2026-03-28 11:01:13+00:00): Hi,

Do not move the roads back to the incorrect position. It is the houses that need moving.

Check GPS.
Jebel_Hafeet (2026-03-30 05:17:35+00:00): Hi aRGUM, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you
Jebel_Hafeet (2026-04-07 09:37:32+00:00): Hi aRGUM,
Thank you for providing the feedback, I have corrected the alignment now.
5m4u9 (2026-04-24 05:33:03+00:00): Hola rodolfo!

estas líneas no deben estar en el mapa. no son algo de la naturaleza.
JJIglesias (2026-04-26 01:37:58+00:00): De hecho, ninguno de los renders las muestran es como si no existieran, y para eso OSM tiene el fondo de OpenTopoMap y tambien el Data Elevation Model (DEM).
iandees (2026-03-25 13:34:46+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3889106019 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180407914, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
Taya_S (2026-03-25 14:06:21+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180409289
NeisBot (2026-03-25 13:39:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 10 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/826041707 v4 | 4 crossings
https://osm.org/way/281545902 v2 | 3 crossings
https://osm.org/way/126808386 v7 | 3 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/2855045210 v6

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180407918
iandees (2026-03-25 14:08:15+00:00): Hello! I noticed that nodes https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2855045210, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6432143071 were moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180409371, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-17 01:28:10+00:00): Cleaned up remaining SEO spam and other tagging for POI in changeset 184204889

https://osm.org/changeset/184204889
rskedgell (2026-03-25 13:43:54+00:00): For some reason, you have deleted the following tags:

amenity=restaurant
brand=Flat Iron
brand:wikidata=Q110680166
cuisine=steak_house

As a result, data consumers (including map renderers) will have no way of knowing that this is a restaurant specialising in steak, or that it is part of the Flat Iron chain.

For all practical purposes, you have removed it from the map.
007Transformer (2026-03-26 11:12:58+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:180448456
rskedgell (2026-03-25 13:46:20+00:00): The whole building is *not* a restaurant.
CRCulver (2026-03-30 11:39:31+00:00): Why are you adding highway=crossing tags to random nodes that aren’t even any intersection between two ways?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7236282969
rajdhani (2026-04-20 06:42:22+00:00): Hi CRCulver,

Thank you for your valuable feedback and efforts to make the correction for identified errors.

The highway=crossing tag was not intentionally added to a random node. It was an existing node I should have removed during the dual-to-single-carriageway conversion, but I missed that during self-QC.

Since there was no physical barrier in the latest imagery (only painted markings), I followed general OSM guidelines. So I also failed to catch the country-specific handling for this type of cases.

The issue has now been reviewed internally as well, and we will adopt more strict validation checks and follow country-specific guidelines for similar cases going forward.
Taya_S (2026-03-25 14:04:41+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180409231
Taya_S (2026-03-25 14:07:19+00:00): Please see: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20051
Kovoschiz (2026-03-26 08:39:40+00:00): `=multifaith` is for accomodating all religions, eg airports prayer rooms. This would be semicolon, or a new val.
kingkingHK (2026-05-29 10:03:48+00:00): Would `=buddhist;taoist;confucian` work?
kingkingHK (2026-06-19 08:17:33+00:00): I will take that as a yes. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184303393
Taya_S (2026-03-25 14:05:37+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180409263
rodolfovargas (2026-03-26 13:56:59+00:00): Geometriza tu dibujo. La dedicación del mapeo también es considerado. Concentrate en la CALIDAD del dato, más que la cantidad. Si un elemento no es RECONOCIBLE en la imagen, lo pasas. 
Continua mapeando.