piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
TheGinger68 (2026-06-21 20:48:13+00:00): Hi, this segment of Corridor H isn’t scheduled to open until June 22nd at 12 Noon EST after the ceremony, and even then it will just be to the WV 72 interchange. I will update it when it is opened, and in the meantime, it should still be tagged as “under construction”.
TheGinger68 (2026-06-21 21:14:25+00:00): I have reverted your change. If you’d like my revert to be reverted, please let me know here.
alstond981 (2026-06-21 23:32:39+00:00): Sorry about that; I opened it early because it usually takes a few days for changes to start showing up in rural areas like this. Would you mind reverting the revert when the road opens?
TheGinger68 (2026-06-21 23:40:09+00:00): Yes, I will as soon as I can after the ceremony. I see your logic on opening it early, but I fear that someone will see it and try to bust through the barriers thinking it’s open. ;)
TheGinger68 (2026-06-22 19:56:40+00:00): The highway has opened, and I have reverted your revert!
alstond981 (2026-06-23 02:44:04+00:00): Great, thanks
HellMap (2026-06-28 11:06:17+00:00): Hey, there's still access=no on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/412667366 - is it still closed/blocked? Also, I assume you haven't moved it west yet? Also what did you mean by construction=footpath on it? Without a main tag like highway=construction, this doesn't really mean anything.
markalex- (2026-06-28 19:15:25+00:00): Yes, it is still blocked: not yet finished construction.

I didn't move it, just left a note for future. Can't check how much it was moved, so will update once it's open and can create a track.

Missing highway=construction was my mistake - added it.
Paweł_M (2026-06-24 19:15:41+00:00): Hej, pewnie przypadkiem przeciągnął ci się węzeł ogrodzenia z okolic domu nr 13 przy ulicy Leśnej i połączył z płotem z okolic domu nr 10 przy Grunwaldzkiej.

Poprawiłem to

W iD przeciąganie mapy i punktów odbywa się lewym przyciskiem myszy więc jak robisz to w gęsto zapunktowanym obszarze to uważaj, zamiast przesunąć mapę możesz przeciągnąć punkt ;)
SENGAM (2026-06-24 19:29:42+00:00): Ajjjjjjj pewnie przypadkiem musiałem to zrobić, bo miałem w myszce baterie na wyczerpaniu i lekko przycinała i tak pewnei sie przydażyło. Będę bardziej zwracał uwagę na te kwestie. Dzięki za reakcję i naprawę :)
Bienson (2026-06-22 01:13:10+00:00): "Hawa Style" und nicht etwa "Haar Style"?
streetfighter101 (2026-06-22 03:19:57+00:00): Ist nicht ganz eindeutig. Als großer Schriftzug steht "HaarStyle" über der Tür, im Logo steht "Hawa Style". Im Gespräch und im Internet Auftritt nennen sie sich "Hawa Style", daher habe ich das als passender angesehen.
eggie (2026-06-21 16:09:24+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback   Het is goed om te weten dat we al adresnodes hebben en het niet nodig is om adresgegevens aan de gebouwomtrekken te hangen.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-06-21 16:11:35+00:00): De adressen heb ik weer verwijderd.
luisforte (2026-06-21 15:11:31+00:00): As vias são desenhadas no OSM, sejam privadas ou não, apenas porque existem no terreno; O OSM tenta reproduzir o que existe no terreno.
Se essas vias são privadas, tem acesso proibido ou  outro  condicionamento, adiciona-se a tag access com o valor adequado. 
Desenhar uma via privada não interfere de modo algum na privacidade das pessoas/organizações nem sequer é visto como tal nas regras de privacidade e segurança do GDPR.
Na wiki existem diversas abordagens a este assunto, como em osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property .
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184393020
eggie (2026-06-21 17:26:46+00:00): Adresinfo verwijderd
Paweł_M (2026-06-24 19:17:02+00:00): Hej, brak tagu access i pochodnych (foot/bicycle/horce/morot_vehicle) jest domyślnie dostępny (yes), więc nie musisz dodawać access do foot/bicycle/horse itp na "yes", bo jest to zbędne
user_5359 (2026-06-27 07:49:28+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1527578193, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1528636538. What is the mean of the keys LUAS-HA
NAMOBJ 
?
anttit (2026-06-26 04:32:27+00:00): Oh, I just noticed this isn't closed for good, but that it's been under renovation since begging of June. The renovation is planned to end in September 3rd. https://www.k-ruoka.fi/kauppa/k-supermarket-kaisaniemi

But, how to revert this edit?
perusluku (2026-06-27 07:56:24+00:00): Palautin takaisin osm-revertillä :)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184684051
anttit (2026-06-27 14:54:34+00:00): Kiitos!
Jay Pantone (2026-06-26 23:59:50+00:00): Firetrucks and ambulences keep trying to use these roads, and they are impassable. Then they have to go back a different direction which takes a long time. This error is dangerous.
MassCartog (2026-06-27 02:38:47+00:00): Hi welcome to OSM. Before the these roads were featured type "service road" with access set as public, that is why routing engines would route that way. They have since been updated to "driveway" feature type and there access tags have all been set to private.

This means going forward the apps/software That uses OpenStreetMap as its data set will not rout traffic through these roads.
arjunaraoc (2026-06-23 01:40:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Your changeset is reverted as Motorway tag has special meaning as access controlled expressway in OSM. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmotorway  .  Your comment on the changeset  also is not correct.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184396407
LakeTana (2026-06-25 18:23:23+00:00): Hello rodolfovargas, I noticed that in your changesets  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184396747 and 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184454259 you modified the classification of the ways at the roundabout to links and also at the T intersections. Specially at way 1528166530 , way 858803546 , and way 439763314. 
According to OSM policy https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Droundabout#Selection_of_the_right_highway_tag 
the highway classification should generally continue through the intersection to maintain consistency and preserve the continuity of the roadway hierarchy. I also noticed that road names have been removed from some of these highway segments, which is creating naming gaps along the route.
Could you please clarify the reasoning behind these edits? I would appreciate any additional context so that I can better understand the intended mapping approach.
Thank you, and I look forward to your response.
Duja (2026-06-28 15:59:51+00:00): Ne slažem se da ova ruta ima name= 	Državni put IM reda M2. To nije ime, to je opis taga ref=M2. Osim toga, tako ne piše ni u citiranoj uredbi. Ovo je poznato u javnosti kao Fruškogorski koridor.
Srdjan023 (2026-07-01 16:24:20+00:00): Tako se sve relacije puteva u Srbiji nazvane vidi autoput Miloš Veliki https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6697754 na primer ili autoput Svetozar Miletić https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16500340 ja sam dao naziv relaciji analogno time
Duja (2026-07-02 11:09:32+00:00): Otvoriču temu na forumu, da ne ostane samo između nas dvojice.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-06-21 16:34:58+00:00): tak to bez sensu

nie ja to budowałem czy projektowałem
user_5359 (2026-06-25 09:12:51+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1531230113. What is the mean of the tags 
34 = 70
84 = 639
?
Wally_PL (2026-06-25 10:27:05+00:00): Hi, they didn't mean anything. I added them by accident, and they've been fixed now. Thank you for pointing it out.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184576452
martinst (2026-06-21 17:30:53+00:00): Hi,
from which geometry source did you draw e.g. way 1531232470? The current heatmap shows a different route, sometimes 100m away.
Is it OK for you when I refine the geometries?
Regards
LonelyStrider (2026-06-21 17:49:09+00:00): yes, it would be nice, if you can fix that way according Strava heatmap.
MisturJoesturr (2026-06-21 21:05:36+00:00): Halkalı durağında iki çıkışı da 1 olarak belirtmişsin doğru mu?
Alikam (2026-06-22 11:43:24+00:00): merhabalar, düzelttim
ftrebien (2026-06-26 01:56:00+00:00): Por que Alegria foi mapeado como place=village? Esse tipo atualmente só é usado para lugares com pelo menos 200 habitantes, mas eu só vejo duas residências rurais no entorno. O correto aqui é hamlet.
mueschel (2026-06-25 18:03:06+00:00): These imported objects have many tags that are not used in any other place. What is the source of all this data?

Please make sure to read and follow the OSM import guidelines before any import of data:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
Maurine Oyugi (2026-06-25 20:43:44+00:00): Hello, 
This data was collected using fieldwork surveys. 
I will read the guidelines. 
Thanks for reaching out.
mueschel (2026-06-25 20:47:50+00:00): Thanks for taking care - please let me know if you need some guidance for common tags for the information you want to add.
Maurine Oyugi (2026-06-25 21:09:44+00:00): I couldn't mind a take through session.
mueschel (2026-06-29 06:53:43+00:00): Here are some of the tags you used with the proper ones:

age_gap=10
I don't know what this means. age range of children can be tagged with minage=1 and maxage=5

play_area=Yes
Could be playground=yes

sanitation = Pit Latrine
 -> use toilets = yes and additional information using https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:toilets:*


staff_no=1
personnel:count  or personnel:count are keys for that

water=Running Tap Water
water_supply = running_water
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/water_supply#overview

photo = files/childcare-facility_20250927100318260_image_0001.jpg
This doesn't help at all, because nobody can access this image

type = Private
should be operator:type=private
Joske1020 (2026-06-23 07:40:19+00:00): zou het kunnen dat je een foutje hebt gemaakt? het bos is nu wit op de kaart.
Rubenke (2026-06-22 12:02:56+00:00): Waarom tag je Cycleway = no, is dat niet gewoon default? 
Mij lijkt dat je deze gebruikt als er fietsstroken oid zijn en niet als deze er niet zijn?
Tomas09 (2026-06-22 22:23:17+00:00): Nee hoor het is zover ik weet geen default. Het is het verschil dat er specefiek staat dat er geen fietstrook is en dat het onbekend is of er een fietsstrook is (:
mute44 (2026-06-22 07:27:17+00:00): Merci d'avoir fait le tour des pataugeoires et d'avoir harmoniser les tags. Il me semble qu'il y a débat entre leisure=swimming_pool et leisure=paddling_pool. As tu un avis à ce sujet ?
Par ailleurs, il me semble que l'orthographe correcte est `pataugeoire` au et non eau
MathGon (2026-06-22 17:32:42+00:00): En effet, grosse boulette sur le eau - au :)

Je pense que je vais aller corriger au québec, nominatim a trouvé plein d'erreurs de l'autre côté de l'eau :)
Concernant ces pataugeoires, l'ajout s'est fait avec ID, avec le tag swimming_pool et l'attribut wading mais je ne suis pas trop au fait du débat :)
Si t'as plus d'infos sur ce sujet qui aurait été tranché je suis preneur
mute44 (2026-06-23 15:13:23+00:00): J'ai lancé le débat ici: https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/pataugeoire-non-visible/43765 . Ca n'avance pas trop. Il y a un problème de rendu avec leisure=paddling_pool qui se confronte à de nombreux swimming_pool=* kid/children'spool/wading dont la définition est imprécise ou large. Il semblerait typiquement que wading s'applique à une piscine destinée au loisir et non à la natation. Les enfants  y on pieds mais elle n'est pas destinée au tout petit.
mstrbrid (2026-07-09 15:46:46+00:00): Hi, did you create Cherry Ave from scratch? I can't quite believe that it wasn't already mapped but your changeset suggests that was the case.
Also, where did you find its name? I wasn't aware that it, or any of the paths in Castle Park, was still called by their old road names apart from possibly St Mary Le Port
cryptickryptos (2026-07-10 11:37:16+00:00): Hi, I did not create Cherry Avenue from scratch per se, it's simply a way split from w4019214 with the name. It is a named path part of the new Bristol Civic Society's tree trail for the park; one of the trees has a little tag with the name for the path. It's not really official but I figured including it is innocuous enough. 

The other path names are not my doing, but another editor some years ago who presumably desired to show the names of the former streets. Not exactly correct but not something I personally wish to remove either.
mstrbrid (2026-07-11 14:35:05+00:00): Ah, of course. I would have expected this stretch to retain the history after the split as it's more prominent.
I was aware of some street renaming nearby by the same user which we had chat about and ended up reverting. I hadn't spotted that the same was done here. Only Back Bridge St remains as a named highway so I'm tempted to revert it on the basis of it being inaccurate.
I'd say the same of Cherry Ave as it's not a name which has been adopted by the local community yet, but would be quite suitable on a umap or equivalent.
cryptickryptos (2026-07-11 15:20:53+00:00): For what it's worth, neither Bridge Street nor Back Bridge Street are physically named anywhere either, as far as I know. But I don't have much of an opinion on this sort of mapping either way, so feel free to make whatever changes you desire.
mstrbrid (2026-07-11 15:54:00+00:00): Thanks for understanding - you're right about Back Bridge St too. I had thought it was still listed on OSOpenRoads, like Bridge St is, but it's not. I'll leave Bridge St though, that's signed on the ground (or was before the construction started), and listed on OSOpenRoads.
Sorry for jumping in like this
AriAlvarez (2026-07-27 16:09:16+00:00): Thanks for adding stop signs in the area. Just a friendly reminder that when you place stop signs, make sure to add the direction that they are facing so that navigation engines know which side of the road needs to stop
comboburrito (2026-07-28 00:53:15+00:00): Ari Alvarez! I'm a big fan, thanks for all you're doing. Will do—thank you for the pointing that out.
MihaelIvanjek (2026-06-23 14:26:17+00:00): Accidentally created node deleted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184479371 #OptimoRoute
Bienson (2026-06-22 01:32:31+00:00): POIs sind am ungefähren Mittelpunkt einzutragen, nicht am Eingang.
Bloomenwease (2026-06-23 17:03:13+00:00): Ich denke, das hängt vom Gebäudetyp ab. Bei großen Gebäuden wie Kirchen oder kleineren freistehenden Gebäuden sehe ich das oft so umgesetzt. Bei Läden im Ergeschoss von Wohnhäusern scheint es gängig zu sein, den Punkt näher zur Straße zu platzieren.
Bienson (2026-06-22 01:29:54+00:00): operator=Volksbank entfernt
SambalPecelMadiun (2026-07-20 01:13:28+00:00): A bit of question, what define streets as secondary or tertiary? I have a plan to update the informations on streets near Abdurrahman Saleh, so information regarding this could be useful
NaufalFarras (2026-07-20 01:35:46+00:00): Hi. I have documented it here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Id:Indonesian_Tagging_Guidelines#Jalan_Raya

Every city has their own characteristics. Basically, the most important intracity roads can be tagged with primary. Streets with lower importance can be tagged with secondary and tertiary. Tertiary streets are narrower and connects residential area complexes to roads/streets with higher class or to major commercial area.

Do you want to update Jalan Abdurrahman Saleh?
SambalPecelMadiun (2026-07-20 10:14:47+00:00): Yes, I am planning to update it this weekend. And thanks for the information too.
NaufalFarras (2026-07-24 09:58:23+00:00): Great. In my opinion, I think Jalan Abdurrahman Saleh can be tagged with highway=tertiary, instead of highway=residential. If you want to tag it as highway=secondary, please also consider whether the unnamed street (east-west street) and Jalan Kemiri are also suitable for that tag.
rajdhani (2026-06-23 05:09:56+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184458447
woodpeck (2026-06-21 20:26:15+00:00): This edit contains invalid data and does not give a credible source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20852
josm19902026 (2026-06-22 05:35:37+00:00): Hello my friend,

First: For technical clarification, these are not overlapping buildings; rather, they are three floors with different architectural shapes.

Second: My tone may sound sharp, but it stems from my deep frustration with how I am being treated. I fully comply with all guidelines and instructions. My sole and primary source for mapping is JOSM 19555, which relies on a bundle of open and officially approved imagery layers built directly into the application, without using any unauthorized external sources. It seems you are unaware of these integrated sources that eliminate the need to look elsewhere. They include:

Bing Aerial Imagery

Esri World Imagery

Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta

Landsat WMTS

Mapbox Satellite

Third: The only technical issue during the upload process is that the system only allows me to specify a single source. This is why I select (Bing), which I rely on for 95% of my work, as the system does not allow me to list the entire bundle for you to see and verify yourself.

Fourth: A great injustice has been done to me by accusing me—without proof or proper inspection of the imagery—of using external sources. Based on this false assumption, I was banned (even if for a short period). This action is unacceptable; it tarnishes my reputation within the mapping community and unjustifiably places my name on a blocklist—an impact that cannot be undone now. It would have been far better to send a direct message requesting clarification, which you would have received immediately. Unfortunately, what happened reflects a lack of professionalism and credibility, and shows a rush to abuse administrative ban privileges.

Fifth: We are dedicated contributors. Our ultimate goal is perfection and accuracy in converting aerial imagery into professional maps, while fully respecting the platform's rules and principles.

Have a good day, and I look forward to your response and clarification regarding this unfair measure.
woodpeck (2026-06-22 22:07:39+00:00): First: There are special tags that you would use if you map different overlaying parts of a building. Please read up on building mapping. Overlapping building=yes objects is not the correct way to do it, and even less so for someone who accuses others of lack of accuracy!

Second: You claim you used aerial imagery, but aerial imagery does NOT let you determine these three different parts of the building. How did you do it? What data source did you use for that?
ZinaidaZ (2026-06-22 10:53:20+00:00): Hello. In this changeset you've been created disconnected footway https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1531246635
it causes "navigational islands" and makes pedestrian navigation impossible in case of route starts on this way. Please fix it
iuvi (2026-06-22 10:58:35+00:00): There are some moments to be see in life to continue drawing this area, it's under construction
limes11 (2026-06-21 20:21:35+00:00): Hallo bert_df, 

willkommen bei osm und danke für deine Initiative. 

Ich habe hier ein wenig nachgebessert. Beim Verwenden von gps-tracks daran denken, dass diese fast immer einen kleinen Versatz haben und Wege eckig erscheinen lassen. Du hattest den Weg ohne große Beachtung der umliegenden Objekte umgelegt, so dass es zu Überschneidungen mit Abhängen, Zäunen und Nutzungsflächen kam. Beim Erfassen der Wege daher immer den gpx-tracks im Kontext der Umgebung einarbeiten und darauf achten, dass gerade Wege auch wirklich gerade eingetragen werden, selbst wenn die gps-Spur sie so nicht erscheinen lässt. 

Der Verlauf in der Ahrschleife bei Laach wird so nicht stimmen. Entweder der Radweg ist näher an der Bahn oder die Ahr liegt weiter vom Ufer entfernt. Aber nasse Füße wird man nicht kriegen :)

Viele Grüße und weiterhin viel Spaß

Limes
Yunan973 (2026-06-22 12:19:55+00:00): Salut,
quand tu fais des modifications, essaie d'utiliser des images satellites récentes : à cet endroit les images de Ortho Express 2025 (datant de l'été 2025) sont accessibles et plus adaptées que les images de 2016 ou 2022.
Cordialement
CAM-Gerlach (2026-06-22 03:30:10+00:00): Hi Kaarlim, could you explain what you were trying to do with this changeset?

It looks like you took a road from the US, moved it to Senegal and turned it in to some sort of representation of a administrative boundary (but missing any appropriate tags that would define it as such). Needless to say, this doesn't seem to make any sense to me or the several other mappers who reviewed it, so we were hoping you could let us know what you actually intended here so we could advise you appropriately.

Thanks, and happy mapping.
Yuri Matias (2026-07-29 11:42:36+00:00): Changeset reverted: 184402527

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186579227
joost schouppe (2026-06-23 07:14:03+00:00): Hoi Mizuna,
Is dit een bijkomende ingang of is deze https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13110379474 dan afgeschaft?
Mizuna (2026-06-23 12:25:40+00:00): Ja, een tweede ingang. Kortste of simpelste weg vanaf hoofdingang ziekenhuis, metro etc.
NieWnen (2026-06-21 22:25:28+00:00): Cześć,
w tej zmianie linia taka jak ta ma nieprawidłowe tagowanie:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1531252043

Zachęcam do poprawy zgodnie z wiki:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Rowery#Drogi_dla_pieszych_i_rower%C3%B3w

jeśli jest to CPR, to zmiana na highway=path, a jeśli nie to warto usunąć tagi bicycle/foot.

Jako, że jest to edycja wykonywana przez edytor iD to dodam tylko, że zawsze warto patrzeć w tagi.
eggie (2026-06-21 20:10:49+00:00): Welkom bij OSM,

Zou u svp de description neutraal willen houden en minder uitgebreid.
Svp aanpassen.. Werving wordt als spam behandeld.
Mvg,
eggie
marckdbreejen (2026-06-22 06:54:49+00:00): De naam van de praktijk, is gelijk aan de feitelijke situatie. De omschrijving was inderdaad commercieel. Onwetenheid Dit heb ik aangepast, mijn excuses en bedankt voor de feed back.  Ik heb ook nog een vraag, kunt ervoor zorgen dat er het juist icoontje bij komt te staan, die past bij de branche?
eggie (2026-06-22 07:03:50+00:00): Dag Marck..

Een icoontje is de keuze van de kaartenmaker.
Er zijn vele kaarten gebaseerd op osm.
OSM is kort door de bocht eigenlijk geen kaart maar een database.
Daar zit helaas geen door u bedoeld icoontje bij. Op de standaard kaart is dan een stip te zien.
De description is oke. Dank voor de aanpassing.

Mvg,
eggie
eggie (2026-06-22 07:18:16+00:00): Niet valide tags die foutmeldingen gaven en/of dubbel waren getagd heb ik verwijderd.
Het icoontje van de stip komt door de tag office=therapist. (Die dus laten staan) 
De naam is nog steeds wat aan de lange kant. Die aanvulling staat al onder description.  Je zou de naam die op de website wordt gehanteerd kunnen aanhouden. Up to you... 

MVG
eggie
marckdbreejen (2026-06-22 08:14:29+00:00): Bedankt
marckdbreejen (2026-06-22 10:13:17+00:00): Wederom bedankt voor het aanpassen van de tags en icoontje. Is echt heel behulpzaam. De naam wil ik graag zo laten staan, is in lijn met de feitelijke situatie en Apple maps, Google maps, ec.
Ltrlg (2026-06-25 20:43:35+00:00): J’ai rétabli way/1317016683, qui était simplement mal tracé.
s777n (2026-06-21 20:00:20+00:00): Исправлено