piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Supaplex030 (2024-05-15 23:30:43+00:00): Hallo Bernd,

danke für deine ausführliche Rückmeldung. Vielleicht kann ich noch ein paar Punkte aufklären:

> warum sollte der Renderer auf der centerline darstellen, dass der Radweg separat gemappt ist

cycleway*=separate lässt sich z.B. zur Generalisierung nutzen, insbesondere, da die Straßen ihre begleitenden Wege oft überdecken. "separate" wird dabei wie "track" behandelt. "Die beiden auf osm.org" tun das vielleicht nicht, aber anderen steht diese Option offen und ich habs z.B. schon selbst für Radkarten so verwendet.


> ich habe auch schon diverse falsch getaggte Wege mit *:both gesehen

Das mag sein, sehe ich auch regelmäßig. "Falsche" Daten (die sich korrigieren lassen, wenn es einem auffällt) sollte man aber mMn nicht mit "ungenauen" Daten vergleichen (die sich nicht korrigieren lassen, wenn man das Schema dafür nicht verwendet).

> "cycleway:left=no"+"cycleway:right=separate" bei separatem Mehrrichtungsradweg sehe ich hingegen sogar kritischer weil irreführend wenn nicht gar falsch, da es im ersten Schritt suggeriert, dass ich left auf der Straße fahren kann/muss/soll, da ja keine Radinfrastruktur für die Fahrtrichtung vorhanden ist.

Nein, dann interpretierst du die Daten falsch oder ungenau. "cycleway" gibt nicht an, wo du fahren darfst/sollst, sondern ist ein reines, richtungsabhängiges Attribut für Infrastruktur. Wo du fahren darfst/sollst, wird durch access-Tags angegeben. In diesem Fall ist durch "bicycle=use_sidepath" klar erkennbar, dass das Routing in beiden Fahrtrichtung über eine Nebenlinie stattfinden soll. Umliegende Geometrien müssen dafür nicht einbezogen werden (Router setzen einfach nur die Penalty für das Segment hoch oder schließen es sogar ganz aus).

Aber nichts für ungut, du scheinst ja zumindest die Intention für das Tagging nachvollziehen zu können.

lg, Alex
APneunzehn74 (2023-08-13 12:19:41+00:00): Hallo Till, ich habe das Parkhaus etwas verbessert, wenn du dort noch einmal vorbei kommst könnte man noch den Zufahrtsweg und den Eingang mit eintragen. Auf dem Weg und dem Eingang kann auch die maximale Einfahrtshöhe (hab gestern ein 2.0 m Schild) gesehen. Den Namen Parkhaus hab ich entfernt, Namen werden in OSM nur für Dinge vergeben die tatsächlich einen Namen haben. 
Grüße APneunzehn74
Bei Fragen gerne melden
user_5359 (2023-07-22 10:07:44+00:00): Hello! Please STOP the insert of foreign keys!
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2023-08-08 14:33:28+00:00): 您好，注意到您将很多电话号码修正为了
+86 123 4567 8900形式的格式，例如 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5576334930/history 
但我对此表示疑问，因为 [E.123](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E.123) 中仅在表示国际电话号码的时候才在前面加国际电话区号，仅在国内拨打的时候是不需要加拨的

事实上，如果您在中国大陆使用中国大陆手机号拨打电话，加拨+86反而是打不通的，我不觉得有必要强调这一点。

当然，这只是我个人的看法，具体应该如何规范电话号码的记载，也希望能听听您和其他编辑者的意见，以及您在其他国家或地区发生的讨论。
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2023-08-08 14:36:38+00:00): (Machine Translation of above)

Hi, noticed that you standardize many phone numbers in China to
+86 123 4567 8900 in a format such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5576334930/history
But I have doubts about this, because [E.123](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E.123) only adds the international telephone area code in front when expressing an international telephone number, only in domestic there isn't necessary to add area code when dialling.

In fact, if you use a Mainland of China mobile phone number to make a call in mainland China, you will not be able to get through by dialing +86. I don't think it is necessary to emphasize this point.

Of course, this is just my personal opinion on how to standardize the recording of phone numbers. I also hope to hear the opinions of you and other editors, as well as your discussions in other countries or regions.
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2023-08-08 14:43:21+00:00): 再例如，您在 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/699616200 中将电话号码更改为了"+86 773 588 6611"，但作为中国本地的编辑者，可以很明显的看出，773是错误的去掉了桂林的区号中的0，广西省桂林市的区号为“0773”，且这是一个固定电话号码不是移动电话号码
按照您所参考的E.123标准，它应该是

(0773) 588 6611

但我不确定我对E.123标准的理解是正确的，因此还希望了解一下您的意见。

我觉得有必要指出的是，在中国，固定电话和移动电话使用两套不同的号码系统，固定电话有区号，而移动电话没有区号
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2023-08-08 14:45:52+00:00): (Still machine translated, but I glance at it)

For another example, you changed the phone number to "+86 773 588 6611" in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/699616200, but as a local editor in China, it is obvious that "773" is because of removal of the area code of "0773"(Guilin, Guangxi) by mistake, and this is a landline phone number not a mobile phone number
According to the E.123 standard you are referring to, it should be

(0773) 588 6611

But I'm not sure my understanding of the E.123 standard is correct, so I would also like to get your opinion.

I think it is necessary to point out that in China, landlines and mobile phones use two different numbering systems, landlines have area codes, while mobile phones do not
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2023-08-08 16:21:46+00:00): ======
抱歉！上面是我对wiki的解读不够到位，应该采用国际形式
您做的对

I'm sorry! The above is my interpretation of the wiki is not in place, it should adopt an international form
you are right
arjunaraoc (2023-07-22 09:01:50+00:00): Please provide detailed explanation of what you did in your changset for  more effective feedback.
Frans S (2023-08-20 12:18:04+00:00): Hello.  A new mapper ! Welcome.
About your mappings. 
You followed the traces accurate.
Please read this wiki how to tag highways. 
About tagging of highways:
Please read and follow the tagging rules on this linked document.
Decision tree, which tag to be used for roads
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1S48CEVi3yiAYWhIJu57jtLyv0ZVUbGwJ/view?usp=share_link
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/East_Africa_Tagging_Guidelines
As you see, you tagged the roads incorrect. Track instead of residential in roads lined with buildings. ( I corrected them)
Best regards
MxxCon (2023-07-31 00:07:24+00:00): "recreation=swimming_pool" is not an appropriate tag combination for this feature.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dswimming_pool documents all the correct tags that are applicable to this feature.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138825367
Richard Try (2023-07-27 12:59:03+00:00): Почему way 459431090 не оставить secondary_link? Редакторы ругаются на безымянную улицу.
literan (2023-07-27 17:08:24+00:00): Потому что это не линк (специальный соединительный проезд между двумя дорогами, как правило, на развязках), а просто конец улицы. Шереметьевской улицы - вот и название.
Richard Try (2023-07-27 19:24:14+00:00): А автобусная полоса продолжающая улицу это тогда другой конец?
literan (2023-07-27 20:41:44+00:00): не совсем понял, где это?
Richard Try (2023-07-29 12:00:21+00:00): Шереметьевская улица продолжается в сторону ул. Советской армии, но только для автобусов
Richard Try (2023-07-29 12:02:26+00:00): Этот автобусный кусочек сейчас highway=service, я бы сделал его secondary как и всю улицу, а поворот направо как link, что логично кажется.
literan (2023-07-29 12:18:05+00:00): а, понял

статусы в России назначаются в зависимости от значимости в дорожной сети (применительно к общему трафику - легковые/грузовые перевозки). Так что значимость дороги только для автобусов минимальна, и их обычно мапят как unclassified
literan (2023-07-29 12:19:29+00:00): или даже как service - смотрю в других местах https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/55.75896/37.58436
MapRobber (2023-07-21 18:51:53+00:00): O prédio está passando em cima da via.
DressyPear4 (2023-07-22 15:04:50+00:00): Olá, vias não devem sobrepor outras a não ser que sejam túneis ou pontes
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138826024
opendcc (2023-08-23 05:48:39+00:00): Hallo, Du hast leider mit diesem Changeset den Haltepunkt Straubing Ost mitten in den Friedhof verlegt. Ich habe das wieder repariert. Kein Problem, sowas passiert am Anfang, aber sei bitte vorsichtig mit vorhandenen Daten. Danke.
mcliquid (2023-07-24 07:30:00+00:00): Hi, "access=agricultural" bedeutet, dass hier ausschließlich landwirtschaftliche Fahrzeuge und Personen betreten dürfen. Ist dies so korrekt? Respektive auch Wanderer sind hier verboten?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138826075
pkm (2023-07-26 20:34:30+00:00): Meinst du diesen Weg ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27311469
foot = yes, bicycle = yes sollte so passen, siehe Beispiel auf https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Dagricultural
Bei den anderen Feldwegen habe ich es mir einfacher gemacht und nur motorvehicle = no gesetzt. Ist streng genommen nicht ganz richtig. Aber das fehlerhafte Autorouten sollte damit behoben sein.
tyfi (2023-07-21 18:27:52+00:00): Addresses note 3791543
tyfi (2023-07-21 18:28:06+00:00): Bridge ref number comes from MoDOT
tyfi (2023-07-21 18:29:56+00:00): This changeset was corrected in 138826264.
tyfi (2023-07-21 18:30:12+00:00): This changeset corrects placement of ref tag in changeset 138826184.
tyfi (2023-07-21 18:31:31+00:00): Layer added in 138826330.
MxxCon (2023-07-31 00:04:20+00:00): The value of the charge= tag is incorrect as documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:charge
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138826272
ceyu (2023-09-19 22:39:18+00:00): Ich glaube nicht, dass es hier korrekt war amenity=shelter zu public_transport=platform aendern. Habe das nun wieder rueckgaengig gemacht.

Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:public_transport%3Dplatform
"Wenn es einen Unterstand gibt, der nicht separat durch ein Tag amenity=shelter erfasst wurde."
Frans S (2023-08-05 12:57:38+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings need to be improved to meet the quality standards of HOTOSM.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document for more info)
A: Not accurately drawn.
E. Buildings not squared.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138826709
Ltrlg (2023-08-15 11:38:47+00:00): La modification de https://www.osm.org/way/189081540 était incorrecte, j’ai corrigé ici : https://www.osm.org/changeset/139910445
Baloo Uriza (2023-07-22 18:39:50+00:00): You should save before jumping long-range to a different area.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138827423
CurlingMan13 (2023-07-21 19:23:30+00:00): updated old railways into cyclepaths as seen on aerial imagery.
user_5359 (2023-07-22 10:18:36+00:00): Hello! Please take a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1190505448. You add the key maxspeed:conditonal , but forget to notice the condition.
KB-01 (2023-07-22 11:32:33+00:00): Yes, I did that with a lot of school zones in the area. The condition is "when the lights on the sign are flashing" but I don't know how to tag that.
user_5359 (2023-07-22 12:26:07+00:00): Please take a look on https://taginfo.osm.org/keys/maxspeed%3Aconditional#values (set a value filter on fla)
KB-01 (2023-07-22 13:49:46+00:00): Oh, I see! Thanks for the tip.
eggie (2023-07-21 19:52:10+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback  Let goed op wat je doet.. Ik zal het gebouw herstellen
en amenity=restaurant toevoegen.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=138828509

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-07-21 20:03:51+00:00): amenity=restaurant toegevoegd
eggie (2023-07-21 19:57:44+00:00): Tip..Wellicht office=lawyer?
eggie (2023-07-21 19:57:02+00:00): Je hebt de school 2x toegevoegd nu, maar waarom?
De tag amenity=school ontbreekt nog.
eggie (2023-07-21 19:55:43+00:00): Chris... Je bent in hoog tempo van alles aan het verwijderen en toevoegen, maar niet alles gaat goed. Lees je even goed in hoe te mappen. Dus geen adressen verwijderen en zoek in de wiki op hoe je een school tagt.
Dit doet helemaal niets.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-07-21 20:03:14+00:00): duplicated tagging aangepast.. schooltag toegevoegd
eggie (2023-07-22 06:56:32+00:00): De school heb ik even op het vlak amenity=school gezet. Je zou dan daar evt.  dat gecombineerde adres aan kunnen toevoegen. 
Scholen kunnen op meer manieren. 
Even ctrl-f5 een paar keer voor het effect. 

Groet
eggie
eggie (2023-07-21 19:54:26+00:00): Tip... Probeer bij te taggen op de adresnode.
eggie (2023-07-21 20:07:26+00:00): Het verwijderde adres heb ik hersteld.
Branko Kokanovic (2023-09-12 12:28:48+00:00): E, samo da ti javim, primetio sam da koristis ono "merge address points" dosta liberalno, pa gomila POI-a zavrsi na zgradi (a ne bi trebalo). Npr. ovde https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/474585798. Ja nisam nasao resenje kako "pazljivo" da ovo radim. Obicno sad radim malo-po-malo, ali nemam ni ja neko resenje:)
eggie (2023-07-21 19:53:55+00:00): Je verwijderd hier de adresnode. Wanneer een bedrijf verdwijnt dan graag het adres intact laten
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-07-21 20:00:43+00:00): adres hersteld 92B
Ich2PunktNull (2024-03-14 20:32:12+00:00): Hallo, bist du sicher, dass beim RK Weissenbach ein Notarztmittel existiert?

LG
MxxCon (2023-07-23 02:26:05+00:00): Hello.
Rather than completely deleting this feature, it's much better to use lifecycle prefixes as documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix.
Or at the very least delete biz-specific tags and leave just address info.
Doing that preserves that object's history if at some point in the future there's ever a need to refer to that. Plus it preserves that address being searchable.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138829890
konstantintutsch (2023-07-23 13:45:56+00:00): Hello,
Didn't know that. So I should change e. g. the tag "amenity" to "disused:amenity" and leave the value the same if a business isn't there anymore, right?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138829890
MxxCon (2023-07-23 13:54:48+00:00): You could put disused: prefix in front of amenity= and optionally delete other biz-specific tags.

If you haven't already, check out app called EveryDoor. It's on both, Android and iOS. It's designed specifically for editing POIs features with easy presents for a lot of things and it has a single button way to mark biz as closed.
You can't create ways with it like with Vespucci, but for POIs it's a lot less clunky. 🙂
konstantintutsch (2023-07-23 15:07:47+00:00): Going to try the app 😄
That would be the 4th OSM related app on my phone though 🫠

Thank you for that info
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138829890
pio2_122 (2023-07-21 20:31:48+00:00): Wprowadzone dane odnośnie ilości miejsc postojowych są niezgodne z informacjami ze strony operatora parkingu: https://www.ka.swinoujscie.pl/parkingi/mpn-informacje
NorthCrab_upload (2023-07-21 20:30:17+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8919166374

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
pitfire (2023-07-22 05:41:33+00:00): Hallo Jule_Beuel,

Bitte erhöhen Sie nicht den Wert von Routen dieser Art, die definitiv nicht ihrem Charakter entsprechen

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=50.771900755204&lng=7.1774912715191&z=17&focus=photo&pKey=5819622161433927&x=0.411796622387518&y=0.5436812214259763&zoom=0.6949152542372878
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-02 09:56:39+00:00): would https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dgrowshop tagging fit for https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11060578312/history ?
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-11 04:52:48+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5163160
Sandal man (2023-07-22 07:14:44+00:00): Hi, thanks for the edit, but can you make smaller edit zones, not the whole EU?
And use the correct word "destination"
Not "designated"
Normally you may only use designated  if there is  a sign on the road, see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:motor_vehicle%3Ddestination
Regards Janus
Travelling Gogly (2023-07-22 22:17:54+00:00): Hi Janus,
thanks for your remarks. You are perfectly right about the edit zone, there was an older entry (Reiherholz) still uncommitted and I didn‘t manage to send it separately... Could I split that anyhow?
Concerning the Calle Doniz you are right, I will correct the attribute.
Actually there is an official sign prohibiting entry between 5:00 and 8:00 and an unofficial(?) one telling that there are GPS „errors“ and prompting to follow the better-suited TF-82 road.
However, our Magic Maps app (based on pure OSM data) tried to route through Calle Doniz which is highly unreasonable so we found it important to indicate somehow that this road is not meant for through-traffic. Looking back in apple or google maps road view you see the restriction sign in Spanish, but not yet the unofficial one.
Think I will stick to the official signing. Is there any other way to down-grade the smaller road by attributes compared to TF-82?
Thanks for your help,
Stefan
Sandal man (2023-07-23 07:48:11+00:00): Google and waze make the same mistake, so I think it is up the the government to change this.
Tagging is now correct in my opinion.
Regards Janus
Jakka (2023-07-22 08:15:57+00:00): Welcome over meerdere regionen/gebieden.

you created a changeset with a large bounding box covering the continent from ..... to ...... This needn't happen and in most cases is kind of bothering the people trying to do some Quality Assurance of the map data. More info here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changes
eggie (2023-07-22 05:36:37+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-07-22 06:30:50+00:00): Dag Chris.. Tagging lawyer lijkt me oke. Wel heb ik je info samengevoegd met de officiële BAG adresnode. We gebruiken de BAG adresnodes om op bij te taggen.
MVG
eggie
pio2_122 (2023-07-21 21:47:10+00:00): Proszę o zaprzestanie błędnej zmiany kategorii dróg.
Więcej info: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Znakowanie_dr%C3%B3g_w_Polsce#Drogi_samochodowe
user_5359 (2023-07-22 04:57:39+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note thatn OSM classification of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
Please draw the driveway (if he is visible on the aerial image)
Osmwithspace (2025-01-08 15:11:10+00:00): Ich denke, etwas in Richtung vehicle=no mit bus=yes wäre passender. Welche Zeichen genau stehen denn da? Siehe auch: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Verkehrszeichen_in_Deutschland
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138832807
porzellanelefant (2025-01-08 16:07:33+00:00): https://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/?signs=250,1024-14
Osmwithspace (2025-01-08 19:07:06+00:00): Ich hab die Straße entsprechend bearbeitet.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161144880
hrhino (2023-07-22 00:08:53+00:00): Hi! Welcome to OSM! Just so you know, you can use Q after adding a building to make the angles square.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138833492
eggie (2023-07-22 05:43:00+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback:

Gebouwen en adressen worden periodiek geïmporteerd vanuit de BAG. Je kunt dit versnellen dmv een verzoek op het forum van OSM.
Dus niet zelf intekeken en adressen aanmaken.
Verder lagen de paden juist goed. Je werkt met een verouderde luchtfoto. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-07-22 05:49:52+00:00): De straten liggen nu in ieder geval verkeerd. access=no (Verboden Toegang) nooit combineren met bicycle=yes en foot=yes..

Ik draai even wat terug en zal een BAG verzoek op het forum neerleggen.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-07-22 06:13:45+00:00): BAG import aangevraagd als voorbeeld hoe zoiets gaat
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/bag-importverzoeken/3394/1136
eggie (2023-07-22 06:33:00+00:00): Hier de situatie in juni 2023
https://www.satellietdataportaal.nl/?base=openstreetmap&res=0.3%2C0.5&datemin=22-07-2022&loc=51.49405%2C5.458027%2C18z&overlay=mos-0&marker=loc&acqdate=2023-06-25&acqid=20230625_111350_SVNEO-01%2C20230625_111352_SVNEO-01&sensor=SuperView-NEO
eggie (2023-07-22 08:46:58+00:00): Nog niet alles is importeerbaar.. maar het is nu meer uptodate.
Mvg..
eggie
Mapperdemap (2023-07-24 20:26:13+00:00): Bedankt voor de uitleg en de verbeteringen! Ik ga erop letten de volgende keer dat ik iets aanpas :)
SunnyIsland10 (2023-07-25 22:06:12+00:00): Correction: Source used was Bing aerial imagery, Mapillary
rskedgell (2023-07-22 05:08:52+00:00): "Better" in what way? Is there any part of the building which is not the pub, which might justify moving the tags from the building polygon to a new point?
OHirschfield (2023-07-22 09:39:15+00:00): Areas don't come up with Pubs on Overpass. This is the accepted way to resolve this issue. Moved data across from area to new point and leave the building. Its not good form to have both.
Dimacn (2023-07-22 06:21:33+00:00): Пожалуйста, не пишите в качестве названия всё подряд. Название - это только название. И не должно содержать описание, тип и характеристики объекта. Пожалуйста исправьте - удалите текст из названия целиком.
ceyu (2023-07-22 19:46:52+00:00): Hallo,

dieser Changeset entfernt leider fälschlicherweise das Gebäude https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/94207599/history und ersetzt es mit einem landuse=retail. Bitte korrigieren.

LG ceyu
Lusos6888 (2023-07-23 09:44:46+00:00): Danke für die Info müsste jetzt korrigiert sein
NorthCrab (2023-07-22 22:08:49+00:00): Witaj! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1191326177 Podjazdy oznaczamy jako driveway a nie track. Track to droga leśna lub dojazdowa do jakiegoś pola.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-07-22 01:00:14+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2553691306
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1087762487

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
tyfi (2023-07-22 01:03:16+00:00): Also impacted Mercer County.
tyfi (2023-07-22 01:05:34+00:00): Also "County Road [A-Z][A-Z]?" is not a correct format for supplemental route names at all. These used to be county roads, but they were taken over by MoDOT/MHTC (i.e. they are state maintained nowadays).
canfe (2023-11-17 07:34:13+00:00): Se il ref è già sulla relazione non va messo sui singoli segmenti
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138835181
Fedurli (2024-01-03 01:16:03+00:00): E chi l'ha detto? Ciò che è inserto sulla relazione non è visibile sulla mappa.
canfe (2024-01-03 07:11:59+00:00): "non si mappa per il rendering"...
Fedurli (2024-01-04 01:02:53+00:00): "Non si mappa per il rendering" non centra proprio nulla con questo. Vai a leggerti qual è il significato di "non si mappa per il rendering" e comprendi la differenza, invece, con il mappare correttamente.

Attendo risposta: dove sta scritto che "non si mette il numero di strada se è già presente una relazione"? Perché sono due cose diverse e hanno funzionalità diverse.

Anche perché io avevo inserito il numero di strada per tutte la zona, numero che è stato deliberatamente rimosso, senza un perché.. poi si fa tanto la morale agli altri.
canfe (2024-01-04 06:06:14+00:00): Guarda, spiegamelo. Così riesco a capire come ragioni.