piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
A67-A67 (2026-03-05 08:06:45+00:00): Dit is niet de website van het station, maar een Engelstalige pagina over het station om de website van een derde partij (9292).
NeisBot (2026-03-04 16:42:48+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13618221037 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Flower shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-12 17:33:15+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179769020
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
NeisBot (2026-03-04 16:45:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13479742065 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Woodworking equipment store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-12 17:33:16+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179769022
(Restore previous tags)

 If you believe this was incorrect or would like to clarify the intent of the original tags, please reply here.
rempshaener (2026-03-08 20:01:38+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.
Du hast in deinem Änderungssatz als Quelle „Wasserpläne (städtisch)“ angegeben.
Das ist in mehrfacher Hinsicht problematisch:
- Liegt dir eine Freigabe für diese Daten vor?
- Dein Vorgehen stellt einen Import dar, für den Standard gelten, siehe osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines bzw. osm.wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct. Die Datenqualität ist zudem nicht ausreichend, um die Daten unverändert bestehen zu lassen.
D. h. du müsstest auf jeden Fall noch einmal an die Daten dran:
Hydranten sollten nicht mit Straßen, Gebäuden u. ä. verbunden werden. Das lässt sich leicht beheben: in JOSM markieren und Alt+J drücken – das löst den Hydranten von der Linie. 
Viele Grüße
FlorianWestenfeld112 (2026-03-09 08:04:36+00:00): Hallo und Guten Morgen!

Vielen Dank für Ihre Rückmeldung!

Ja, mir liegt die Freigabe der städtischen Wasserbetriebe vor, dies obliegt keinem Problem!
Ich bin aber leider nicht allzu erfahren in der Arbeit mit dem Programm, weshalb ich sehr froh um ihr Feedback bin!

Die Hydranten werde ich noch einmal überarbeiten!

Vielleicht können Sie mir eine Frage beantworten, nach dem Überarbeiten, soll ich die Datei nochmal neu hochladen, oder wie ist da der beste Weg?

Vielen Dank und viele Grüße!
rempshaener (2026-03-09 20:07:56+00:00): Hallo,

du bearbeitest die Daten direkt im Editor und lädst sie dann online hoch.
Bei Fragen bitte melden.

Viele Grüße
FlorianWestenfeld112 (2026-03-10 11:20:02+00:00): Guten Tag,

Ich habe alle Daten noch einmal überarbeitet und sollte diesmal alle Punkte korrekt gesetzt haben und ohne Verbindungen.

Vielen Dank für Ihre Unterstützung.

Viele Grüße!
NeisBot (2026-03-04 16:51:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13615212421 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Flooring store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-12 17:33:19+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179769024
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
NeisBot (2026-03-04 16:54:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13479975819 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Variety Store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-12 17:33:21+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179769026
(Restore previous tags)

 If you believe this was incorrect or would like to clarify the intent of the original tags, please reply here.
NeisBot (2026-03-04 17:09:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13480098577 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Plumbing supply store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-12 17:33:22+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179769029
(Restore previous tags)

 If you believe this was incorrect or would like to clarify the intent of the original tags, please reply here.
StC (2026-03-13 12:16:40+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre qui passe par là. Je m'occupe de la réparation.
JakovRajić (2026-03-07 17:32:12+00:00): Forgot to remove tag from the north, fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179502724#map=19/38.820652/-77.048909
VictorIE (2026-03-18 09:16:44+00:00): Hi,

Double-mapped building: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1483108713/
TrickyFoxy (2026-03-05 12:19:29+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179394012
NeisBot (2026-03-04 17:36:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/523372341 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Day spa"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-13 05:33:02+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179789146
(Restore previous tags. Same version)

If you believe this was incorrect or would like to clarify the intent of the original tags, please reply here.
hdaps123 (2026-04-15 13:00:57+00:00): This update is not correct at this time. It appears to refer to the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic, whose status is still disputed and not universally recognized. For that reason, it should not be pushed globally until the issue is fully resolved, as it affects users in other countries, including Morocco and the USA. Please revert this change and remove the dividing line as well.
Colbertson (2026-04-15 18:19:20+00:00): i only added the latvian name to it, i didnt add the territory or adjust any borders
heres an osm wiki page about disputed territories and how they get handled
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Disputed_territories
SomeoneElse (2026-07-05 10:58:02+00:00): @hdaps123 If you believe that something is wrong please discuss it in the forum https://community.openstreetmap.org/ .
Vaidotas (2026-03-04 18:32:58+00:00): Why did you simplify geometry of this house, that was drawn very closely to what it looks like on orthophoto? And it still has an intersecting segment after this "fix".
FvGordon (2026-03-04 19:35:51+00:00): I have reverted my last edit on this building to leave it to you to correct the outline of this building.
Vaidotas (2026-03-05 16:36:56+00:00): Someone was faster than me and fixed it already. Thank you.
stillhart (2026-03-21 21:47:32+00:00): i'm confused. aren't the shell chargers actually tesla chargers??
Zol87 (2026-03-26 02:40:15+00:00): I was going by the suggested changes in iD editor. If you knwo better you can change them back. I was at the mall recently for something else, but didn't look the chargers up close especially since I don't have a car and use public transit.
Taya_S (2026-03-04 18:08:38+00:00): Reverted deletions of military mappings

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179361973
eggie (2026-03-04 18:56:39+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback.. De spatie heb ik weer uit de postcode gehaald. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Delamox (2026-03-04 19:53:26+00:00): Dankjewel voor de correctie!
@sbe (2026-03-04 22:54:57+00:00): CAUTION
On "Kaya Tene Kòrsou Limpi" between "Blue Bay Main" and "Helmin Magno Wiels Boulevard" there are 6 "traffic_calming:bump". You can find at each end of this road segment a signpost, but none of the 6 obstacles is clearly announced (no signpost or ground paint) !
@sbe
tomhukins (2026-04-04 13:41:12+00:00): Hi, thank you for all your good work on improving the map.

I have combined two car parks here that were https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/589290079 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1250879960 in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180854568 as I believe they are the same feature, not two separate car parks.  Please let me know if I made any mistakes.
motogs (2026-04-04 14:55:03+00:00): Thanks for doing that Tom, and letting me know. It looks fine to me. They are indeed one car park.
Taya_S (2026-03-04 18:08:39+00:00): Reverted deletions of military mappings

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179361973
ajmat (2026-03-05 12:16:42+00:00): Revert of 179361867
JakovRajić (2026-03-10 11:16:02+00:00): Measurement unit fixed in changeset/179362011
JakovRajić (2026-03-10 11:17:22+00:00): Correction: fixed in changeset/179632598
diacriticalhit (2026-03-06 18:23:15+00:00): Hi, novaTopFlex. It looks like you created some buildings in this changeset. If you want to square off the sides, press `Q` with the selected way in the editor.
NeisBot (2026-03-04 18:39:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/1485452616 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Banquet hall"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-13 05:33:03+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179789148
(Delete spam tags, v1)
Bienson (2026-03-04 20:33:06+00:00): source=metal?
FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (2026-03-05 05:44:19+00:00): ist rausgenommen.
Bienson (2026-03-12 01:57:14+00:00): source="paving stones" ???
NeisBot (2026-03-04 18:45:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13618461048 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Loja de móveis planejados"
---
Por exemplo, uma versão mais neutra e factual do seu texto poderia ser: "Loja de móveis planejados"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-13 05:33:11+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179789157
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
Tatfahren (2026-03-04 20:49:24+00:00): Ist das tatsächlich der Straßenname, oder eher eine Beschreibung deinerseits? Vermutlich sollte er mindestens großgeschrieben werden, wenn die Stadt nicht unbedingt was außergewöhnliches ausschildern wollte.
JakovRajić (2026-03-10 11:28:13+00:00): Wrong tag; fixed in changeset/179633389
NeisBot (2026-03-04 19:03:48+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13476803600 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Automotive service center"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-13 05:33:13+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179789162
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
Bienson (2026-03-04 20:36:26+00:00): source=verdichtet?
Bienson (2026-03-04 20:39:34+00:00): Bitte lesen:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:tunnel%3Dbuilding_passage
FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (2026-03-05 05:51:11+00:00): ist korrigiert. Danke.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-04-24 12:01:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 181761661 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious changes in Somali, Ethiopia.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20179
Nickl (2026-05-11 18:30:18+00:00): We tried this way end of April, but couldn't find the way.
jkoe (2026-03-04 19:18:33+00:00): sources: local knowledge, i survey them
Tomas_J (2026-04-04 12:04:04+00:00): Ahoj. Na priechode mode 10316968810 je ostrovček? Na ortofoto z 2023 som ho nevidel... Zmenil som na bez ostrovčeka, tak úprav späť alebo mi napíš ak by to bolo nesprávne. Dík
G4rden3r (2026-03-05 10:16:26+00:00): Moin, kurzes Feedback zu deinen Änderungen. Eine Adressnode kann auch separat getappt sein, ist häufig auch besser) und muss nicht an ein Gebäude. Dies macht es später, wenn ein Gebäude abgerissen wird deutlich einfacher die Adress zu erhalten (inkl. History)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179365574
wachsihh (2026-03-13 17:32:44+00:00): Moin,
schon wieder machst Du das Routing für Fußgänger kaputt. Bitte höre endlich auf damit. Wer soll das alles reparieren? Du hilfst hier nicht.
Vielleicht findest Du ein anderes Hobby?
LG
NeisBot (2026-03-04 19:39:50+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13618565131 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Assessoria jurídica"
---
Por exemplo, uma versão mais neutra e factual do seu texto poderia ser: "Assessoria jurídica"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-03-13 05:33:14+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/179366149
Minh Nguyen (2026-07-30 20:17:42+00:00): You didn’t align the road with the boundary, you aligned the boundary with the welcome signs. This is taking the welcome signs far too literally. Caltrans often puts the signs slightly before or after the state line as circumstances allow. [1] These are informational traffic signs rather than legal boundary markers. They can satisfy the requirement that a boundary be verifiable but they don’t define reality.

[1] https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:California-Inyo-Nevada_border_signs.jpg
Minh Nguyen (2026-07-30 20:21:24+00:00): Changeset 186667493 undoes the boundary changes.
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-07-30 21:06:15+00:00): Well, if you look closely at the satellite pictures, I-5 changes colors as it crosses the boundary (black for California, gray for Oregon). THAT's what I used to define the "on-the-ground" boundaries.
Minh Nguyen (2026-07-30 21:10:08+00:00): boundary=administrative is an administrative boundary, not a drawing of where Caltrans and ODOT left their mark. DOTs usually run over the boundary for practical reasons.
Minh Nguyen (2026-07-30 22:18:39+00:00): https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/aligning-state-borders-to-pavement-quality-transitions/145948
NeisBot (2026-03-04 19:48:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13618565131 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Assessoria jurídica"
---
Por exemplo, uma versão mais neutra e factual do seu texto poderia ser: "Assessoria jurídica"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-13 05:33:15+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179789164
(Restore previous tags. Same version)

If you believe this was incorrect or would like to clarify the intent of the original tags, please reply here.
NeisBot (2026-03-04 19:54:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13618583226 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Beach deli"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-13 05:33:18+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179789166
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
NeisBot (2026-03-04 20:00:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13618325820 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Lamp store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-13 05:33:20+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179789167
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
dieterdreist (2026-03-11 11:20:32+00:00): Hi Simon, I noticed you removed the peaks that were part of the border Switzerland / Italy from the border, e.g. here https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1372957872
Was this on purpose? It seems not so unlikely that the peaks are actually defining the border.
SimonPoole (2026-03-11 12:09:19+00:00): Yes this was on purpose, as ungluing from all other non-border elements (for obvious reasons)..

The border was originally imported from swisstopo (the same source as from where we are updating it now) with no reference to peaks etc. 

While legally, as in the contract between IT and CH, it might be defined with reference to peaks we would need for the peaks to be at the location used when that happened. In any case it is clear that the current location of the  peaks in OSM doesn't directly define the border so it doesn't make sense to include them.
dieterdreist (2026-03-11 16:34:57+00:00): IMHO you should have either kept the topology or checked that it wasn’t correct, now you gave up topology for the sake of presumably better positional accuracy
SimonPoole (2026-03-12 08:45:37+00:00): You are jumping to conclusions. 

Yes, the person doing the import added a small number of (unnamed) peaks at the time. This is weird as we had no such data and the dataset didn't include it (the relevant POI/peak data from swisstopo wasn't open data back then). Some of these peaks were later edited and relocated.

The rest were added much later, without reference to topology or the border, and the simple explanation, applying Occam’s razor, of why they were joined to border is accidental gluing.
dieterdreist (2026-03-12 09:14:45+00:00): my assumption would rather be they added peaks to the boundary on purpose instead of doing it accidentally, you at least wrote you removed them on purpose, I am just trying to find out what your sources and motivations were, at first you just wrote “obvious reasons”.
NeisBot (2026-03-04 20:00:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 12 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1485483293 v1 | 6 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179366598
MadelineMaddie (2026-03-04 20:17:38+00:00): Hi.

I would like to understand exactly what the problem is? I did slightly shift the road to fix it, but all I am doing is adding missing forest/tree area, so I'd like to know what is causing the issue and if there's something i should change.
osmviborg (2026-03-05 07:09:27+00:00): Suggest delete 'area:yes' on way1485483293
MadelineMaddie (2026-03-05 07:13:29+00:00): Okay interesting, I just used the area tool and that automatically has that tag, I'll remove it from now on as I continue working on this area
osmviborg (2026-03-05 07:17:25+00:00): Det er en fejl at ID sætter det tag, det sker ofte ved arbejde med områder. Læs wiki'en omkring 'area:yes'
watmildon (2026-05-23 18:13:49+00:00): Thanks for updating this!