piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mga_geo (2024-10-15 11:34:31+00:00): Bonjour,
Attention la découpe de ronds-points avec iD conduit très fréquemment à casser la continuité des trajets relations route=bus cf https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/FR/BRE/FR-BRE-CORALIE-Analysis.html
Je viens de reconstituer le rond-point mais cela a peut-être un impact sur vos modifications.
Marc
JBaba (2024-10-15 12:06:10+00:00): Bonjour,
Merci pour la correction !
Pour mettre en place le rond point j'ai du effectivement "couper" des routes, mais je ne comprenais pas trop comment  remettre en place ces relations.
Dans votre lien, il y a la liste actuelle des problèmes ?
Merci
JB
mga_geo (2024-10-15 13:25:36+00:00): L'outil PTNA analyse toutes les nuits les réseaux qui sont configurés.
Après une modification qui impacte plusieurs relations, j'attends le lendemain pour voir les résultats de l'analyse.
JBaba (2024-10-15 17:01:16+00:00): Parfait, merci !
mga_geo (2024-10-16 05:20:23+00:00): Il restait l'arrêt Malakoff qui était positionné sur une voie.
Avec JOSM, je l'ai extrait et positionné légèrement à l'ouest.
Vous pouvez le repositionner à sa place exacte.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-10-14 22:40:59+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9898155497

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2024-10-14 22:51:05+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3240243785
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/625832924

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
woodpeck_repair (2024-10-14 23:02:49+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 157809914, 157864393, 157875516.
RedAuburn (2024-10-14 23:04:03+00:00): src https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4479266
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-10-14 23:09:43+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 154869683, 155891607, 155936924, 156243657.
snopas24 (2024-10-14 23:25:55+00:00): source: https://www.gramor.com/reeds-crossing
mcliquid (2024-11-07 10:17:06+00:00): Bitte nicht als Kritik verstehen, aber es hilft bei der Kontrolle von Changesets sehr, wenn diese generell etwas kleiner gestaltet sind. Ich würde mich freuen, wenn du das zukünftig zumindest mitberücksichtigen würdest. Danke dir!
woodpeck (2024-10-27 18:48:44+00:00): I think you should use highway=tertiary less frequently. Many roads you have upgraded to "tertiary" would be "residential" in my opinion, for example the "Strada Berzei"! Perhaps it would be useful to discuss with the Romanian community before you upgrade further roads.
une abeille (2024-10-24 18:04:44+00:00): Reverted for changing buildings into landuse areas

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158308044
ralley (2024-10-15 23:55:08+00:00): Please use meaningful comments in your changesets: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157899766
nevw (2024-10-15 00:13:01+00:00): There is another imagery provider - Esri - it has imagery showing the new building
heyitsbench (2024-10-15 01:15:02+00:00): Source was entirely aerial imagery, unfortunately forgot to tag as such when submitted.
iandees (2024-10-15 14:27:49+00:00): Now add addresses :-)
jumbanho (2024-10-22 16:08:58+00:00): Nice!
Frans S (2024-10-19 10:12:12+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
C: Collecting adjacent buildings and mapped is as 1 building.
H: Included a yard of clearing.
Buildings need to be tagged as 'building=yes' This is default at HOTOSM projects.

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157901197
phoenixsaigon1698 (2024-10-15 02:21:06+00:00): Dùng ESRI Satellite đừng dùng Bing
Udarian (2024-10-15 02:19:05+00:00): the opening_hours tagging here is done incorrectly for more info see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours. also the change set comment doesn't really tell me what you've done in the commit, for more info see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Pritikin71 (2024-10-15 02:28:09+00:00): True, corrected
Udarian (2024-10-15 02:27:05+00:00): next time please leave a better change set comment, for more info see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments, also I doubt that diet:pizza is the correct tagging to use in this 
case (for more info see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:diet:*); from what I can tell cuisine:pizza would be a better tag, for more info on that see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cuisine
Pritikin71 (2024-10-15 02:33:21+00:00): Thanks for the corrections, it's my first time.

I can't add cousine:  because its a ice cream Shop but they sell pizza and a few italian specialties too. Help me with that.
kartler175 (2024-10-15 10:28:50+00:00): What is this https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/60700110#map=15/45.11534/-79.72193 ? 
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:golf%3Dhole
ObscureAngel (2024-10-16 09:01:18+00:00): Hello and thank you for your contribution !

Please note for the future: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to :
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping ! :-)
_Thico_ (2024-10-16 10:08:58+00:00): Hello, thank you very much for the guidance. Have a great day and happy mapping to you too!
silversurfer83 (2024-10-15 16:47:44+00:00): Hallo UKausch,
ich hatte dich in einem früherer Edit zu diesem Thema schon einmal angefragt, auf welcher Basis du diese großangelegte Änderung durchführst.

Du schreibst weiterhin keinen ordentlichen Kommentar und hast weiterhin nicht erklärt, warum du hier auf diese Art aktiv wirst.

Außerdem wäre es hilfreich, wenn du dich auf kleinere Gebiete pro Upload beschränken könntest. Das macht es einfacher deine Arbeit zu überprüfen.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157901812
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-18 05:05:20+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165095780
utteringmute (2024-10-15 03:55:26+00:00): Erratum: This is in Lanao del Norte.
(Inactive) hairyhaggis_kaart (2024-10-16 14:03:27+00:00): Hi AgusQui, we noticed you reverted our changes to this intersection again. Thank you for informing us about how the ‘palitos’ work in Argentina. We have noticed some inconsistency with how you are mapping them though. For example at the intersection just to the east, it has the ‘palitos’ yet that road is split into 3 seperate ways. 

If you would like keep this intersection as a single bi-directional road that is fine, but its not OSM practice to have all the ways leading into one, single node. We would propose mapping it how the OSM wiki suggests mapping a single carriageway intersection with a dual carriageway. Can be seen here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Junctions&veaction=edit&section=3 Thanks, hairyhaggis
AgusQui (2024-10-17 03:38:53+00:00): Si no recuerdo mal, tendré que pasar por la zona a revisar, la dársena de giro hacia San Martín está separada físicamente, por eso está dibujada a parte, las otras 2 ways se debe a que se extendió la unión hacia donde se separa la dársena, se podría dibujar mejor. Cuando pueda relevar la zona mejoro esta union retrasandola hacia San Martín.
No entendí que me quisiste decir en el segundo párrafo.

Saludos.
Supaplex (2024-10-15 08:21:32+00:00): Hi

You draw tow buildings which actually are more than 10 building. Can you fix it?
You can look at the Mappilery streetview image for an idea of what Taiwan buildings look like
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157902860
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-10-18 22:30:24+00:00): Thats not a road
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157903019
Taya_S (2026-01-31 17:33:52+00:00): Reverted nonsense SEO edits

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177935143
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-10-15 04:55:24+00:00): znalezione https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1SF6

patrz https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157655082 i podlinkowane tam edycje i podlinkowany tam FB

patrz też https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155387112
ivanbranco (2024-10-18 20:45:12+00:00): Hi vairankode,

highway_authority_ref requires a highway tag.

Also I noticed this building:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1324029179/history
is it really a building? or a indoor=room?
vairankode (2024-10-19 11:49:20+00:00): building
mavl (2025-03-07 15:08:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
Supaplex (2024-10-15 08:17:42+00:00): 這也一樣，都不應該用place
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157904142
Supaplex (2024-10-15 08:17:44+00:00): 這也一樣，都不應該用place
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157904142
Frans S (2024-10-15 07:56:09+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 
However, please square the buildings with the Q key while they are still selected.


Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157904331
kabelhaai (2025-07-20 13:56:08+00:00): Is this a private road? https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4866250
Yannick Lambin (2025-07-22 07:31:09+00:00): Une chaine en travers de la route et un panneau sur cette chaine l'indique clairement
渤海西岸 (2024-10-15 08:17:59+00:00): 使用Esri 世界影像最新照片
karayama (2024-10-15 09:14:29+00:00): 经JOSM等工具检测，Esri 世界影像等影像存在偏移现象。而Mapbox是为Foursquare、Pinterest、Evernote、《金融时报》、天气频道、优步科技等公司提供的大型卫星地图供应商。使用OSM作为底图的卫星地图网站也多使用Mapbox提供的卫星图。
在osm提供的影像中，Mapbox也和Bing航拍等卫星底图在偏移上几乎一致。在缺乏GPS轨迹定位的手段下，OSM绘制目前应该遵循Mapbox。
此外Esri 世界影像不够清晰，也只是相对最新。如果使用Esri 世界影像可手动调整偏移到Mapbox的标准
tux67 (2024-10-18 16:19:21+00:00): Hi physi,

hast du das vor Ort geprüft? Name auf dem Straßenschild schon geändert?

Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157904857
tux67 (2024-11-03 14:56:13+00:00): ok, keine Antwort - hab' selber nachgesehen: 
https://panoramax.openstreetmap.fr/#focus=pic&pic=dbeb5f89-6a3b-4505-b4d1-139ca39406e7
Wenn wir das dann mal wirklich umbenennen, wenn das Schild getauscht wurde nehmen wir auch gleich die anliegenden Gebäudeadressen mit.
Gruß
tux67
Supaplex (2024-10-15 08:08:48+00:00): 直接加閘門上吧，不要另外用place
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157904975
Supaplex (2024-10-15 08:08:49+00:00): 直接加閘門上吧，不要另外用place
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157904975
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-18 04:53:29+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165095630
NorthCrab_upload (2024-10-15 06:20:48+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2766012313

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
pitscheplatsch (2024-10-15 13:06:46+00:00): Hi Jack_Regan, welcome to OSM.

May we know the reason behind deleting building which are visible in the utilized satellite imagery? Thanks.
Jack_Regan (2024-10-15 17:53:17+00:00): See the comments at: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157673417 I was reprimanded for using Google Streetview for reference in some of my edits so I had to revert them all. I will be returning to restore anything which has been deleted.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-18 04:53:30+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165095630
josmougn (2024-10-15 22:01:32+00:00): tombé sur cette modif' par hasard. Si c'est un ensemble scolaire alors "place=locality" ne va pas.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4568926589

A noter qu'on peut définir un groupe scolaire avec une zone landuse=education englobant plusieurs amenity=school
frosm (2024-10-16 06:43:36+00:00): mais un landduse sur un noeud ne va pas non plus et je ne connais pas l'étendue de l'ensemble scolaire
literan (2024-10-15 17:20:02+00:00): это не ресторан

корректные теги
food=prepared_meals
shop=food
takeaway=only
YulianaPinbox (2024-10-18 10:21:04+00:00): спасибо, буду внимательнее
literan (2024-10-19 12:41:27+00:00): Любопытно, оказывается, конкретно эта "Без тарелок" - с тарелками :)
https://t.me/raidedrests/4382

Добавлю тег amenity=cafe (для бистро этот тег применяется)
YulianaPinbox (2024-10-22 07:38:24+00:00): в жизни происходят неожиданные вещи иногда)) спасибо за вашу внимательность
phoenixsaigon1698 (2024-10-16 04:43:55+00:00): Dùng ahorn.lima-city.de/tr để check error Nếu biển báo ko works thì xóa đi nhé. Để xóa full relation cần xóa mọi member (from, via, to) của relation đó.
tuan_gsm (2024-10-16 07:18:43+00:00): Fixed and work. Thanks
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-11 08:06:32+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12252267330/history has fixme:type = shop that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What kind of shop is here?

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop for common values - is any of them fitting?
TheLNL (2025-04-14 07:22:41+00:00): I don't recall what exactly, I think it might be plates made of leaf and other similar items.

I don't recall for sure though, give me a few days time I will recheck the area and get back
smartsmartie (2025-03-01 21:57:08+00:00): Hallo simax32,

ist diese Brücke auch für Fußgänger erlaubt? Du hast das mit highway=cycleway ausgeschlossen. Hier findest du eine Übersicht zum Kartieren von Radwegen:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen_kartieren#Eigenst%C3%A4ndige_Wege

Viele Grüße und einen schönen Abend!
NorthCrab_upload (2024-10-15 07:10:47+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12252313591

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
phoenixsaigon1698 (2024-10-16 04:42:55+00:00): nếu cấm quay đầu vĩnh viễn (ko time-based) thì ko cần restriction:conditional nhé.
tomhukins (2024-10-23 13:34:04+00:00): Thank you for helping to improve the map.

I notice the restaurant named "Lilienblum" has a house name "Passo Restaurant".  Is there one restaurant here, and if so what is its name, or do both exist nearby?

I'm happy to help if you like, and I hope we can make the map better reflect what currently exists here.
user_5359 (2024-10-16 09:05:25+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1324047906. What is the meaning of the tag phimcachnhiet = phimcachnhietnhakinh?
user_5359 (2024-10-16 09:08:12+00:00): Please I had Google translate the Changieret comment and only identified SPAM. Data has been completely reset
silversurfer83 (2024-10-15 19:13:23+00:00): Howdy :)

just a little heads up: Good of you to use the lifecycle prefixes on empty shops. One little thing, though: please remove all unnessesary tags like opening_hours and phone and so on when a shop closes. I went ahead and did that here.

cheers
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157908277
woodpeck (2024-10-18 08:43:00+00:00): Dear gscholz, in this changeset you have blindly "fixed" a self-intersection of a completely fictional airport that someone had added. Your modification makes it more difficult for other community members to revert the bad edit.

It is good that you are looking out for OSM quality but please keep both eyes open while doing so. If someone sees a horse and maps it as a "kow", and you then "fix" that mistake by changing it to "cow", you haven't actually improved anything ;)
gscholz (2024-10-23 09:32:51+00:00): Thank you for keeping me up to date here. However, I would like to point out that I find the tone you have chosen in this message rather disrespectful. Whether a newly added airport has any representation in reality or not cannot be judged without local knowledge.  The term “blind” and the other comments strike me as superfluous polemics and nothing of added value.

The fact that changes to erroneously added data make reverting more time-consuming is a triviality that is part of everyday business when working with OSM data and is therefore a simple matter of craftsmanship.

I therefore recommend to choose in future cases messages with appreciative wording, such as the following:

Dear contributor, as I was trustworthy informed of an edit that added a non-existent airport, I also had to undo your correction as this additionally changed the incorrectly edited data.

Thank you for your contribution.
Yours sincerely
... (enter your name here)
woodpeck (2024-10-23 13:00:51+00:00): It appears to me that rather than being impolite, I was *too* polite and therefore didn't get my point across. 

What I wanted to say is: "fixes" that superficially fix something - like you did here - are unwanted and complicate the *real* fixing. They make OSM worse, not better. Your lecturing about  "craftsmanship" rings hollow when it is the other mappers (who actually fix things) of whom you expect such craftsmanship, while not being willing to invest the same yourself.

In the future, when you fix something because of a geometry error, you are expected to use reason to ensure that the whole thing isn't totally fictitious (or a broken import or something else that warrants a different kind of attention than just a geometry fix). If you are unwilling or unable to bring that amount of "craftsmanship" to the table because you can only invest two minutes per "fix", then please refrain from making the edit in the first place, and leave it to someone who can do it with the necessary diligence. 

If you encounter something where you believe a proper fix might require local knowledge, the same applies - just leave it to the locals.
wegavision (2024-10-15 18:38:47+00:00): Wir sind gerade dabei das Gleich in der Weststadt zu tun. Da wird es immer wieder Konflikte geben, ich kann schon nicht mehr meine Arbeit von heute Mittag hochladen, weil die Punkte von Dir geändert wurde. Wenn du hier weiter machen willst, suche ich mir einen anderen Ort.
cuzi (2024-10-15 19:09:11+00:00): Oh okay, ich kann das pausieren. Ich bearbeite nur die StreetComplete Quests unterwegs, wenn ich sowieso irgendwohin laufe. Ich glaube ich kann in der StreetComplete App die Quests für Gebäude zeitweise deaktivieren. Du scheinst ja hauptsächlich Gebäude zu ändern, oder?
eggie (2024-10-15 08:45:15+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback   Het is onduidelijk wat wat voor een bedrijf dit is. Het is zeker geen park.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark
Voor zover bekend is dit een woonhuis en heeft het 'bedrijf' geen bezoekadres.
Je edits...https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=157909702  
Je bijdrage wordt verwijderd. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Tjuro (2024-10-15 08:45:41+00:00): Beste Mowie1235,

Welkom bij OpenStreetMap,

Ik heb gezien dat u hier een park toe hebt gevoegd. Ik heb dit voor nu even terug gedraaid.

De ruimte die hier beschikbaar is kan niet groot genoeg zijn voor een park.

Binnen OSM is het alleen de bedoeling om POI's toe te voegen waar klanten naar toe kunnen gaan. En die verifieerbaar zijn aangegeven.

Als dit het geval is dan ontvang ik graag een beschrijving met wat voor soort plek dit is en bewijs waarom klanten hier mogen komen.

Met vriendelijke groet,

Tjuro
Mir76 (2024-10-28 18:46:25+00:00): Урочище - это именованный кусок местности, удалять его - вандализм. Откатил.
Mir76 (2024-10-28 18:47:02+00:00): От того, что снесли руины домов, название местности не поменялось.
bxl-forever (2024-10-15 09:17:33+00:00): Hello,

Thanks for adding local shops to the map.
Just one point: to add a shop, it is better to create a floating point inside the building instead of changing the tags of the building directly, as you did here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/675771251/history

Also, phone numbers won't work if you use the "Belgian style".  Apps will work better if you use the  ITU-T E.123 format, which is the standard for OSM.
Therefore: +32 2 123 45 67 instead of "021234567", where +32 is the international calling code.

Hope this will help you making better contributions.  Happy mapping.
MichS (2024-10-15 15:23:26+00:00): Hallo und Willkommen bei OSM.

Bitte beim Eintragen möglichst bestehende Linien nicht löschen und in beinahe gleicher Form wieder einzeichnen, sondern die Knoten verschieben. Bspw. beim Park. So bleibt die history erhalten.

MFG
DerLukas15 (2024-10-15 15:38:42+00:00): Hallo MichS,
mir ist danach auch aufgefallen, dass der Park anders war.
Es macht natürlich Sinn vorhandene Linien zu nehmen und nicht ein Objekt zu löschen um es dann neu anzulegen. Ich werde darauf jetzt mehr achten!
LG
streckenkundler (2024-10-22 19:38:37+00:00): Hei Stefan,

schau doch mal bitte... Du hattest in diesem CS für das kurze Wegesegment https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1236772142/history ein oneway:bicycle=yes gesetzt.
Das hätte zur Folge, daß Route https://www.knooppuntnet.nl/en/analysis/route/9730562 nicht mehr bidirektional funktioniert... Irgendwie sollte hier eine Lösung gefunden werden.

Danke,

Sven