piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
antonr (2023-02-22 09:29:20+00:00): Men det er jo highway=bus_stop du faktisk har flyttet/skabt til at være på vejen. Ikke stop_position... 

Det er fint for mig (men unødvendigt?) at du opretter stop_position på vejen, men det virker forkert at flytte highway=bus_stop til at være på vejen

Se 10683436713, og 8242928669 som henvist til ovenfor.

Jeg er med på at der i virkeligheden (og i osm før dine ændringer) var 2 bus_stop ved Ålykkevej/Julsøvej. Efter dine ændringer er der 3... En er flyttet til midt på vejen (burde være på oprindelig placering ved skilt/skur) og en anden er oprettet midt på vejen... Hvis der skulle være mening i dine ændringer forestiller jeg mig at du skulle have:
- Ladet de oprindelige 2 bus_stop være på deres plads ved siden af vejen
- Oprettet 2 nye stop_position på vejen

PS jeg har fulgt[1] i mit seneste forsøg på at opdatere denne buslinje. Jeg synes det er en rigtig fin metode.

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Refined_Public_Transport
antonr (2023-02-22 09:33:16+00:00): Her er et eksempel mere hvor der nu er 3 bus_stop, hvor der før var det korrekte antal, nemlig 2: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10683436711
antonr (2023-02-22 09:34:30+00:00): Og her er der nu 4 i stedet for 2: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10683436709
antonr (2023-02-22 19:35:30+00:00): En ny variant: Disse to[1] bus_stop har du smeltet sammen med vejen... Der er altså stadig det korrekte antal men de er nu ukorrekt placeret midt på vejen (i modstrid med wiki, og med den effekt at man ikke længere kan aflæse hvilken side stoppet til)

Jeg har svært ved at forstå dit system... Det virker som nogle ret upræcise ændringer, der i hvert fald ikke gør data mere konsistente... Før dine ændringer var buslinje 7 ret gennemgående mappet som highway=bus_stop (placeret korrekt ved skilt/skur). Nu er den et miskmask af bus_stop og stop_position hver for sig og blandet, ved siden af og på vejen...

[1]
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9724821763
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9724821764
antonr (2023-02-22 21:28:22+00:00): Her endnu en sammensmeltning: Ene bus_stop[1] slettet, det andet[2] flyttet til midt på vejen. Resultat: Det er ikke længere muligt at have forskellige felter (fx shelter=yes/no) på de to stoppesteder (du har tilsyneladende valgt shelter=no til sammensmeltningen, hvilket på sin vis er korrekt, da der ikke er noget busskur midt på vejen...)

Jeg tænker umiddelbart at revert af ændringerne er nemmeste vej til virkelighedstro data. I hvert fald nær Silkeborg. Der er også ændringer for andre steder, fx Ganløse, i changeset. De område kender jeg ikke til, så dem vil jeg lade andre vurdere...

Men jeg vil gerne høre fra dig inden jeg reverter. Det kunne jo være jeg bare ikke har set lyset.

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9724821767
[2] https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9724821766
PT-53 (2023-02-22 07:44:24+00:00): Hallo TuxedoCartographer,
statt 
- location=surface
zu ergänzen, wäre es vielleicht sinnvoller
- layer=-1
zu löschen.
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Grüße

PS: 
Für Fragen oder Anmerkungen bitte den Änderungssatz aufrufen und unterhalb Diskussion in das leere Feld eintragen.
TuxedoCartographer (2023-03-07 15:18:04+00:00): Ah, dann habe ich wohl die Aufgabe bei StreetComplete etwas falsch interpretiert. Danke.
MxxCon (2023-02-22 02:52:54+00:00): Hello.
Rather than amenity=community_centre this seems to be more suitable as office=security.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132839107
Bobropiton (2023-02-25 21:58:57+00:00): Здравствуйте. Зачем удалили сегменты дорог/светофор/переход?
eggie (2023-02-21 15:39:16+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback  Je jachthaven staat nu twee keer op de kaart.. Maak svp een keuze...  Het beste denk ik kan alle info op het vlak.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-02-21 15:42:18+00:00): De node heb ik verwijderd. Alle info naar het vlak verplaatst
MVG
eggie
MxxCon (2023-02-22 02:59:14+00:00): Hello.
You mapped sidewalks on Brighton 2nd Pl as crosswalks. Please pay attention what kind of ways you have selected. :)
Additionally, when mapping sidewalks, please pay attention to iD editor's warnings about crossing ways and connect them where appropriate. 👍
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132839964
literan (2023-02-23 20:10:23+00:00): в тег name пишется только название, а не тип объекта (он задается тегами)

верну обратно
DD1GJ (2023-02-21 22:42:33+00:00): Hello,

you have to chage shop into disused:shop, name into old_name and remove the unnecessary entries. I have already made these changes. Take a look at the differences between #6 and #8:

https://osm.mapki.com/history/node/6758855376

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
Langlaeufer (2023-02-21 15:56:23+00:00): Das war der alte Lidl. Die aktuellen amtlichen Luftbilder zeigen noch den alten Supermarkt kurz vor dem Abriss. Der Bau des neuen Marktes ist bisher nur auf den Maxar Premium Bildern zu erkennen.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132840661
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-21 15:21:07+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1097062140

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
silversurfer83 (2023-02-23 10:18:12+00:00): Howdy :)
adding addr:housenumber=xx to a way doesn't look quite right to me. Wouldn't it be better to just leave it blank if the value isn't known yet? That way the chances of StreetComplete picking it up would be better, would it not?

cheers
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132840832
herisusa (2023-02-26 20:29:53+00:00): Hi,
komme jetzt erst dazu zu antworten.
Normalerweise lasse ich sonst ebenfalls die Nummern weg und ergänze einen Hinweis, daß die Hausnummern fehlen.
Es war glaube ich schon später, da lässt die Konzentration nach.  ;-)
Gruß
Heribert
silversurfer83 (2023-02-27 01:19:30+00:00): Moin
Passt schon und das mit dem mappen unter suboptimalen Bedingungen kenne ich 🙈
Dachte nur, dass das komisch aussieht und ich lieber mal nachfrage
Grüße
Silversurfer83
itchybellybutton (2023-02-21 21:38:47+00:00): Hi roggrogg,
ich bin mir ziemlich sicher, dass das Cafe auch am Wochenende geöffnet hat, so wie es auch auf der Webseite steht. Kannst du das prüfen?
roggrogg (2023-02-22 00:00:01+00:00): Völlig richtig, ist mir bei der Korrektur durchgerutscht. Habe es eben geändert. Danke!
Dodko (2023-02-21 19:51:53+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10683574990/history
adresa by mala byť v budove a vyzerať takto:

addr:city=Košice
addr:conscriptionnumber=1239
addr:country=SK
addr:housenumber=1239/16
addr:postcode=04001
addr:street=Jazdecká
addr:streetnumber=16
addr:suburb=Sever
eggie (2023-02-21 15:43:20+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-02-21 15:45:41+00:00): Feddback  Meestal zijn tweewielers uitgezonderd van eenrichtingsverkeer.
Is dat hier het geval. Dan toevoegem oneway:bicycle=yes  en evt ook voor moped en mofa ivt.
Het routeert anders niet meer voor fietsers hier.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-02-21 15:47:11+00:00): herstel.. oneway:bicycle=no
eggie (2023-02-21 15:56:37+00:00): Uitzonderingen toegevoegd.. Het zou anders niet correct routeren
MVG
eggie
Jochem van Galen (2023-02-21 15:58:58+00:00): Oke, hartelijk bedankt
eggie (2023-02-21 16:18:15+00:00): Zat eerst nog zelf te schutteren, maar nu is het correct.  :) Ook bij de beide tunneltjes in het andere stadsdeel. 
Maar prima om het actueel te houden. 

Mapse
eggie
eggie (2023-02-21 15:46:54+00:00): oneway=no svp niet taggen op reguliere wegen..
Bij oneway=yes de uitzondering toevoegen voor tweewielers.
oneway:bicycle=no
Gr eggie
eggie (2023-02-21 15:53:38+00:00): Uitzonderingen hier toegevoegd   Richting weg omgedraaid bij tunneltje.
Gr eggie
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-21 15:40:24+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o miejscowości.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3218672523

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Dave Venables (2023-02-21 19:33:22+00:00): Thanks for tidying; I do find some of the "attractions" added via MAPS.ME suspicious (and amusing sometimes) and guess that they were probably only given that description as it is early in the alphabet. They do generally get removed after the editing prompted by them is completed (generally within a couple of days but not in this case)
mavl (2023-04-23 15:59:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:11:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
user_18526234 (2023-02-21 18:58:56+00:00): Hello Dilys,
I seems that you have added or eddited some landuse=village_green. Please read:
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:landuse=village_green
Would a more specific tag like grass or shrubbery be more appropriate?
Please read:
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:landcover=greenery
For a list of alternative tags.

The object in question is:
https://www.osm.org/way/419170657

Greetings Tjuro
Dilys (2023-02-22 09:12:51+00:00): No, I did not add or edit village greens, but unglued a path. Please reconsider the use of bots for commenting on changesets. Used like this, bots are an annoyance.
Dilys
mavl (2023-04-23 16:04:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
gscholz (2023-03-18 10:47:55+00:00): Hi Catjacket,
this changeset has destroyed this wetland relation:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6872902

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-13.19268&lat=15.59026&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=132841869

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
mavl (2023-04-23 15:49:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:06:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:57:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:53:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:01:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:08:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:01:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:05:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:06:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:59:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:59:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:10:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:56:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:48:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:55:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:04:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:10:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:05:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
antonr (2023-02-22 19:21:55+00:00): Hej Niels, 
Også i dette changeset har du flyttet  (mindst) et bus_stop[1] fra at være korrekt placeret ved siden af vejen, til at være forkert placeret som del af vejen... Hvad er ideen?

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9724821765
mavl (2023-04-23 15:50:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:52:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:56:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:11:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
Frans S (2023-02-21 16:53:23+00:00): 
Hello. Thanks for mapping on this difficult task.
About mapping of tall apartment blocks

Mapping of tall buildings differs from standard buildings. Because the imagery is taken at an angle, you see both the rooflines and also the side of a building. 
How do you map such a building?
Map over the rooflines and lastly slide the mapped building to the footprint.
Here is a video how that is done.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1V5-bADsYiffCD9bo6l64YOdTvmKqMGry/view?usp=share_link

And.... don't forget to square each rectangular building.

Best regards and keep mapping
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-21 16:10:57+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9986230689
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3201893985

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
G_P_J (2023-02-24 11:08:32+00:00): Poprawione.
mavl (2023-04-23 16:06:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:55:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:02:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
itineris (2025-09-07 18:25:56+00:00): Szia!

Egy barlangnak tényleg van irányítószáma?
Pl. node/6188298931

(Tudom, hogy elvileg a teleknek van, márpedig ha helyrajzi szám van, akkor földterület is van.)

Van értelme/haszna akár a település, akár az irányítószám kitöltésének egy mezei barlang esetében? (zsolt_d kezdte, aki a Barlangnyilvántartásból átmásolta az adatokat.)

Üdv:
Ákos
vasony (2025-09-07 20:49:41+00:00): Szia!

Az egész címnek valószínű nincs így értelme egy barlangnál ami nem látogatható.

De ha van település, akkor nekem csonka irsz nélkül.
Vagy szedjük le az egész címet, vagy akkor maradjon így egyben, szerintem

T
mavl (2023-04-23 16:11:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:05:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:56:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:05:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:59:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
AwFi (2024-02-17 14:58:21+00:00): Ciao, ho visto che hai modificato molte linee da main a branch, come mai questa scelta?
Buona giornata

PS: Visto che mappi molto le ferrovie, da quanto vedo, ti lascio il link del fruppo telegram per le ferrovie italiane https://t.me/OSMFerroviarioIT
ja+ (2024-02-26 09:38:59+00:00): Ciao, considero come branch le linee secondarie, i tratti di collegamento tra linee principali o quelli con scarso traffico.
mavl (2023-04-23 15:51:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:47:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
Hans Thompson (2023-02-21 17:39:41+00:00): Great edits!
user_4332932 (2023-02-21 17:49:02+00:00): thank you
mavl (2023-04-23 16:01:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:53:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:05:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:01:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].