piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2026-06-07 06:01:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183764451, 183764460, 183764431, 183764453, 183764448, 183764459, 183764455 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20768].
Marek-M (2026-04-24 18:17:57+00:00): Cześć, to jest słup z transformatorem a nie sam transformator https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11740907333
Przed Twoją edycją było to poprawnie zmapowane.
Marek-M (2026-04-24 18:19:29+00:00): Wiki też tak to widzi: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:power=pole?uselang=pl#Konstrukcja
DressyPear4 (2026-05-05 17:58:08+00:00): Só acho que deveria ser feito em áreas menores, verificar sobreposição com  que já existe e deletar onde nada existe antes de enviar (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1503319658)
george1201 (2026-04-24 13:59:25+00:00): Hallo ***juggernaut***
Du hast die Zufahrtsstraße zu "Draht Walput" (Häfenweg 20) privat gemacht.
Wie soll ich jetzt als Kunde dorthin kommen?
george1201 (2026-05-13 22:39:20+00:00): Danke für die Korrektur.
NorthCrab_upload (2026-04-24 11:31:30+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1503320936

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
YraFyra (2026-04-27 21:22:35+00:00): Hej
Pizzerian hamnade på helt fel plats (längs Sandgatan) när du extraherade den. Nu har jag flyttat tillbaka den till ungefär rätt plats vid torget.
Tillsammans gör vi kartan bättre!
bxl-forever (2026-04-24 11:25:44+00:00): Hello,

Your changeset has been rejected.

Please do not change the name of the buildings.  The building itself is Van Maerlant.  The institutions (or, more generally, offices) are mapped as separate objects, you should not mix and create extra-long names mixing different concepts.
Jeigmz (2026-04-24 10:42:38+00:00): Ive been mapping the missing buildings in Croydon park
bxl-forever (2026-04-24 11:23:22+00:00): Hello,

Please do not mess with the address system, you are adding duplicate data (i.e., you added address tags to the building outline here, whereas all the addresses in our city are already on the map).  I will revert the bad edits.
gurglypipe (2026-04-24 15:25:22+00:00): Heya, thanks for this, it’s an interesting contribution (and an interesting building!).

I’ve modified your edit slightly to use building:part tagging for the different parts of the building, to avoid common tags like the address and name being duplicated.

I’ve also tweaked the tagging of the overhead corridor, although I’m less sure about the best way to tag these, so suggestions welcome for further improvements to that. :)

See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181771198 and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:part

Hope that’s OK, let me know if anything doesn’t look right!
a-sav (2026-04-27 12:48:26+00:00): I will pay attention to the building parts next time. With the corridor, I think it is a matter of best practice in the area. I was using this webpage about 3d buildings as a guide: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_3D_Buildings, but to denote that there are no rooms I tagged it as a bridge. I agree this is confusing - corridor fits better.

By the way, thanks a lot for the curation, I am really glad my edits are corrected as it helps massively to improve my future additions.
gurglypipe (2026-04-27 12:54:33+00:00): No worries, building part tagging is quite niche and most contributors don’t know about it. For someone who’s only done ~40 edits you’re doing some really high quality stuff, so thank you for your attention to detail!

I (and a few others locally) keep an eye on all edits in the NW of England. Mostly it’s to stop spam, but it also means we can fix typos and try to help new contributors along where possible. :)
eggie (2026-04-24 15:46:35+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.


Feedback   Zie foutmelding.
Maak altijd een verbinding met kruisende wegen. Het zal anders niet routeren. Is dit een nieuw aangelegd fietspad.. Tweerichtingverkeer? oneway=no?? 

warnings:crossing_ways:highway-highway 	9

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-04-24 15:52:42+00:00): Wat is dit voor een fietspad G13, G11?
Is het tweerichting. Op recente foto's is het nog niet te zien.
LukteDukte (2026-04-26 15:30:54+00:00): Bra tillägg av placering och information. Inga extra tillägg behövs göras. Bra jobbat.
OlasMapy (2026-04-25 19:52:00+00:00): https://powiat-nowosolski.pl/znowu-remont-na-drodze-pomiedzy-bytomiem-odrzanskim-a-nowym-miasteczkiem-to-bedzie-droga-powiatowa/
OlasMapy (2026-04-25 19:52:59+00:00): widnieje opis ze chodzi o droge inna ale ze ma zniknac
kubzon7 (2026-04-25 20:33:26+00:00): Ten artykuł jest z 2020 roku, wtedy kończono drogę S3 i zmieniono numerację dróg krajowych i wojewódzkich w tej okolicy
OlasMapy (2026-04-26 12:05:00+00:00): 16 kwietnia 2026 roku nawet na stronie psize
OlasMapy (2026-04-26 12:05:49+00:00): albo przeglądarka DuckDuckGo mi źle podpowiada
kubzon7 (2026-04-26 12:56:34+00:00): Niemożliwe żeby opisywali DW nr 293 w 2026 w tamtych okolicach, proszę zobaczyć, że w zarządzeniu nr 31 Generalnego Dyrektora Dróg Krajowych i Autostrad z dnia 15 grudnia 2021 r. w sprawie nadania numerów drogom wojewódzkim nie ma na liście tej drogi. Był to czas pomiędzy zdegradowaniem drogi do powiatowej w województwie lubuskim a nadaniem numeru w Bydgoszczy (https://edziennik.gddkia.gov.pl/legalact/2021/31/)
OlasMapy (2026-04-26 15:53:06+00:00): Sprawdzę na miejscu
kubzon7 (2026-04-26 16:00:42+00:00): Od razu mówię, w terenie nie ma tabliczek E-15b. Podobnie było po otwarciu obwodnicy S5 i przez około dwa lata nie zmieniono DK5 na DW239 oraz DK25 na DW238, sprawa do zgłoszenia do ZDMiKP.
LukteDukte (2026-04-26 15:24:52+00:00): Du har gjort en bra tillägg av restaurangen.

Ända som jag ser bör fixas/kolla är öppet tider. Lite omväxlande, via hemsidan, hur deras öppettider är. Doc man kan lägga till flera tider. 
t.ex. "Mo-Fr 10:00-20:00; Sa,Su 10:00-18:00"

Extra grejer man kan lägga till:
- Telefon nummer
- Länk till hemsidan för resturangen

Annars har du gjort ett bra jobb. ^^
hatul (2026-07-15 10:33:30+00:00): Thank you for the contribution. It is better to avoid linking to Google Photos, as it is a private platform. It is recommended to use links to free-licensed images (such as those from Wikimedia Commons) to ensure long-term accessibility and copyright compliance.
matheusgomesms (2026-04-30 14:46:05+00:00): Oi Giovane,

Essas alterações (adicionar restrição de viragem a essas vias de serviço), fez com que o estacionamento e o hotel ficassem inacessíveis a todo mundo.

Reverti essas alterações, e ainda me ponho à disposição para falarmos melhor sobre seu roteador que aparentemente está usando essas vias de serviço inadequadamente.

Matheus
eggie (2026-04-24 15:53:42+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Senihtu (2026-04-25 05:38:09+00:00): Hi!
Wenn die Bessie-Coleman-Straße jetzt länger gesperrt ist: weißt Du, wo die Buslinien X61 und X77 während der Sperrung lang fahren? und: bekommst Du mit, wenn die Straße wieder offen ist? (d.h. wann man die Umleitung wieder aufheben kann?)
happy mapping!
John_mapper (2026-04-27 13:43:42+00:00): hi, die Busse fahren in Fahrtrichtung Südbahnhof über die Amelia-Mary-Earhart-Straße. Das hab ich noch entsprechend gemappt. Ich bin regelmäßig vor Ort und schaue es mir an.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-04-24 12:01:35+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 177441483, 177480706, 177703001, 178406229, 179364799, 180369119, 180473610, 180775649, 180860081, 180905806, 180999855, 181388502, 181736902.
9_tab (2026-04-25 10:06:29+00:00): addr:state=DE would be addr:country=DE . For more see https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2oEl
radixches (2026-04-25 13:23:23+00:00): Thanks for pointing this out!

Unfortunately I've done this mistake 128 times while adding addresses in Mayen. I'll correct these entries over the coming days.
9_tab (2026-04-25 16:25:08+00:00): I can fix them if you prefer. It can be done fairly efficiently.
radixches (2026-04-26 12:02:32+00:00): Done. I used the following search query in Vespucci/overpass to select all objects, checked them and then edited the tags:

"addr:state"=DE in Mayen

See changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181842200
eggie (2026-04-24 16:01:34+00:00): Martijn,

Ik heb de uitzondering voor tweewielers op oneway yes verwijderd.
MVG
eggie
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2026-04-26 14:23:17+00:00): نرجوا عدم تعديل هذا المكان و وضع مسميات غير حقيقية فهذه الخريطة عامة ويستفيد منها الجميع، وأي تغييرات عبثية تجعل مصداقية تعديلاتك أقل ثقة وتؤدي في النهاية لحظر جميع تعديلاتك!
Ksa2030 (2026-04-26 14:34:37+00:00): هذي الاسم متعارف عليه محلي وكل السكان يعرفون بهذا الاسم
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2026-04-26 16:41:07+00:00): ايه يسمى اسم شخص على ديره، أرجوا وضع ما يثبت كلامك رسمياً أو أرجوا منك عدم تغيير اسم هذا المكان
mdblouin (2026-04-24 12:31:50+00:00): Also replaced Guzzo (closed) with Ciné Starz
iandees (2026-04-24 13:39:24+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5457337239 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181766202, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
LudovicG (2026-04-28 13:35:00+00:00): Bonjour,
Je pense qu'il y a erreur sur la "ref". "Argences" serait plutôt le bureau de poste le plus proche ?
D'après dataNOVA, la ref pourrait être A0C9L8 (toujours un format A9A9A9).
Avez-vous l'occasion d'y repasser ?
AlbaireN (2026-04-28 15:13:52+00:00): Effectivement j'ai mis "Argences" dans "ref" car il n'y avait pas la référence que voit d'habitude sur les boîtes aux lettres hormis l'inscription "Argences" (ou peut-être caché sous la boîte aux lettres qui a été installée sur la boîte aux lettres de la mairie). Ce n'était peut-être pas pertinent.
LudovicG (2026-05-09 06:41:03+00:00): Merci pour le retour, j'ai modifié en conséquence.
iandees (2026-04-24 13:39:35+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5728716579 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181766218, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
Frank Peng (2026-05-16 02:16:03+00:00): I'm curious as to why you reversed the one-way restriction of this service road?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181764232
ChrissW-R1 (2026-04-24 21:43:02+00:00): Please check https://osm.org/note/5264537
ordinatous (2026-04-28 19:51:58+00:00): Hi, what you expect with this note ? I gonna close it next week.
osmviborg (2026-05-12 12:01:14+00:00): Tåstrup er vist ikke en børnehave. Er rettet. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/34322495/history/26
qrisztly (2026-05-12 13:02:43+00:00): :D Godt set! For øvrigt, jeg blev ved med at have problemer med besynderlig adfærd med ID i Chrome efter vi skrev sammen den anden dag. Endte med at gå tilbage til Firefox, som ellers for et halvt år siden var noget utilfredsstillende i sin håndtering af ID, bare for at teste. Og hold da op, dens afvikling af koden må virkelig være blevet strammet i de senere versioner, den kører langt bedre end Chrome nu. Anekdotisk, og kun på min maskine, men der er helt rart at se Firefox give Chrome baghjul for en gangs skyld.
silversurfer83 (2026-04-24 19:29:54+00:00): Moin :)

du hast hier einige access=agricultural eingepflegt. Ich hab die Schilder an der Ecke jetzt nicht im Kopf... Stehen da 250er + Landwirtsch. Frei? Im Wald eher die gelben Schilder von Hessen Forst, oder?

Grüße
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181764694
silversurfer83 (2026-04-24 19:28:26+00:00): Hi zen0,

Thank you for adding POI using OsmAnd. It is a fine app.

There is one (known) problem: When adding new POI it prominently offers to add a name=* to the POI. This isn't really neccessary, especially the names you gave to the huts sound just like descriptions.

Please only add a name, when a thing has a name as described in the wiki in the link above.

safe travels
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181764759
zen0 (2026-04-27 13:13:33+00:00): Hi silversurfer83,
Thank you for the hint. You are probably exactly right with the name tag: I didn't get it's optional. I will consider this next time. I removed the descriptive names in 181890400 and 181890327.
silversurfer83 (2026-04-27 14:55:11+00:00): Thanks for the speedy fix :)

If you have any questions just ask
AngocA (2026-06-19 23:07:00+00:00): Hola cdcastillob, este tipo de mapeo es indoor y tiene otro tipo de etiquetas, además de requerir planos para la precisión.
ZgolBoi (2026-04-25 19:06:22+00:00): skoro gotowa do oddania to dlaczego nieprzejezdna? czekają na zgodę?
OSMaper_xD (2026-04-26 07:32:12+00:00): Już tłumacze. Droga ma już wymalowane oznakowanie poziome i ponowe, pouzupełniane barierki, jedyne co zostało to wykonać serwisówki i wykończyć obiekty mostowe (również nie te na głównej jezdni). Droga jest na podobnym (lub nawet lepszym) stadium budowy w stosunku do przejezdności OMT.
SomeoneElse (2026-04-24 15:06:28+00:00): Hello,

Please see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/please-review-added-the-british-overseas-territories-to-the-uk-and-uk-eez-relations/143296 and the replies that say "revert and discuss".

I definitely think that there is a discussion to be had, particularly about "what should be in the EEZ", but that needs to happen in the forum first.

Best Regards,
Andy (from the DWG)
Till_btn (2026-04-25 06:05:40+00:00): "height=1" war sicher ein Versehen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/73898744
Roeckx (2026-05-01 21:47:11+00:00): Is dit geen onderdeel van bus 36?
multimob (2026-05-05 13:12:01+00:00): De pendelbus volgt dezelfde reisweg, maar rijdt met een aparte lijnnummer. Is het niet zo?
Roeckx (2026-05-05 14:48:38+00:00): Voor zover ik weet is geen aparte pendelbus naar station Linkeroever?
Voor het traject tussen Van Eeden en het station is de route van bus 36 aangepast. De pendelbus P5 stopt niet aan het station.
In de routeplanner van de lijn zie ik ook enkel bus 36 staan aan station Linkeroever.
NorthCrab_upload (2026-04-25 00:52:51+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1906559887
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1906553172
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1906564847
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/180212310
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/108454521
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/180211535

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Kovoschiz (2026-04-25 09:55:51+00:00): Why?
cinebeunice (2026-04-26 13:33:05+00:00): Hello! Welcome to the OSM community! Curious if you were trying to mark the building in the park as demolished? If so I would recommend keeping the area there and tagging it with demolished:building=yes so other mappers know the building has been demolished despite it still being on the satellite imagery. It also looks like there's a large amenity=park region encompassing a significant area around Alaska Street Park. Is this a mistake? Apologies for the small novel, I'm happy to do some cleanup if its a bit technical with the tagging and all, just want to make sure what I do is accurate to what folks are seeing on the ground. Thanks so much for helping out with the map!

 - Benjamin
felipeeugenio (2026-04-24 15:46:29+00:00): 3/4 forest deleted were perfect natural=wood. I´ll replace them later
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181767872
iandees (2026-04-24 15:30:20+00:00): Hello! I noticed that nodes https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5034892810, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7217102189 were moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181771467, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
ssummoner1 (2026-04-24 14:31:36+00:00): A pegazus _Hungary elköltözött a Harsona utcáról a monostorpályi útra, a volt oláh gumi helyére. A mellette lévő unix alkatrész helyét pedig a sonepar vette meg. javítottam az épületeket.
SomeoneElse (2026-04-24 15:21:38+00:00): Hello,
Due to some other issues, the changeset that you were fixing was reverted here - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/please-review-added-the-british-overseas-territories-to-the-uk-and-uk-eez-relations/143296/5 .  
Can you recheck that whatever you were checking is now still OK?
Best Regards,
Andy
PulisakZ (2026-04-24 16:22:45+00:00): Hi Andy.
Yes, this one I have updates is (still) OK :) 

Thank you!
Syl (2026-04-24 16:32:22+00:00): Bonjour, après vérification sur place et dans les données de La Poste j'ai annulé cette modification. Les précédents horaires étaient les bons, ceux écrits en petit correspondent à un bureau de poste pas à cette boite.
iandees (2026-04-24 15:30:23+00:00): Hello! I noticed that nodes https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11416378440, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3636401204 were moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181771470, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
Comino (2026-05-05 07:07:44+00:00): I've fixed as many tagging mistakes as possible. Please check our wiki for more help.

https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
BTC Map
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Comino
ch0k1 (2026-05-07 14:48:07+00:00): What exactly was wrong and did you fix?
Comino (2026-05-07 16:45:25+00:00): Hi,

Please compare changeset:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182234953

with yours:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181769655
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-01 10:41:39+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags/values in changeset 184906777

https://osm.org/changeset/184906777
MassCartog (2026-04-24 15:24:34+00:00): Hi enfinety, welcome to OSM. In this changeset it looks like you are removing features that some do appear to exist on the ground. 

I'm not sure what you mean by erroneous if they do actually exist. Please do not remove any features if they still exist on the ground. If they are inaccurate or are tagged as the wrong feature type Please just update them rather then removing them!

You have a new account and might not be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground. If it exists on the ground, it is valid data regardless of a feature being public or private, designated or informal/illegal/unauthorized. 

If access is the issue, please use OSM's tagging system. access=private, or access=no would be appropriate if they are closed to the public. Once this is done, services that do use OSM data will reflect that and specify their access.

Please read this for more info:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won't_delete_roads_on_private_property

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F
enfinety (2026-04-24 16:21:06+00:00): Okay, sorry about that. Thanks for the info
MassCartog (2026-04-24 17:16:24+00:00): Np, thanks for the reply, happy mapping!
iandees (2026-04-24 15:30:29+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8600815543 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181771475, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2026-04-25 21:42:17+00:00): These are not secondary highways.
eggie (2026-04-24 15:56:46+00:00): Alle gebouwen zijn directe ingemeten import vanuit de BAG (Kadaster)
Je kunt niet naar daken kijken en dan de gebouwen gaam uitlijnen. Daar staan de gebouwen niet. Het zijn schuingenomen luchtfoto's.
MVG
eggie
JNgineer (2026-04-24 16:49:33+00:00): Bedankt voor de feedback!
eggie (2026-04-24 16:55:33+00:00): Ik heb wat opnieuw uitgellijnd mbv de bgt
Mapse!
Lê Tuấn Minh (2026-04-24 15:22:28+00:00): Trình chỉnh sửa Vespucci của tôi bị lỗi nên ko yêu cầu phải viết mô tả changset, nhưng lại dùng đúng mô tả changeset gần nhất tôi sửa, đính chính lại đây là chỉnh sửa của tôi về 1 số lỗi bản đồ nghiêm trọng ở bán đảo Linh Đàm, phường Hoàng Liệt, thành phố Hà Nội
rempshaener (2026-04-24 18:28:17+00:00): Hallo,
du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Ein anderer erster Mapper hat bereits das shop=Energietechnik ersetzt. Bei „Standard“-Tag-Value-Kombinationen gibt es nur englische Werte. Ersetzt hat das jemand gegen shop=plumber.
Du könntest noch das
Daimler-Industriegebiet=wert
löschen.
Vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag und weiterhin viel Spaß beim Mappen.
Viele Grüße