piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Comino (2025-10-30 17:31:11+00:00): Hi,

In your edit, you used many incorrect and deprecated tags.

Street addresses in all capital letters are not allowed; please update it.

Please DELETE the currency:BTC=yes tag (it does not exist).

Please change the name to: To The Moon.

Update the opening hours.
Please use the correct format: https://projets.pavie.info/yohours/

Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag.
Use "currency:XBT=yes" instead.
Please DELETE the payment:ethereum=yes tag.

The description tag reads like an advertisement, which is not allowed. Please update it.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description
The description=* tag can be used to provide additional information about the related element to the end-user of the map. It should be short—a few words or maybe one to three sentences at most. Only neutral and factual information is allowed. Do not include subjective evaluations, for example, "the best restaurant in the city." Do not use the tag for advertising messages.

You are not using the correct phone number syntax; please update it.

For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Merchants#tagging-guidance
and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bitcoin

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
https://btcmap.org/tagger/6794624
SomeoneElse (2025-11-30 19:50:55+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!,

On this changeset you've used a "source=Google Maps" tag. We can't actually use that as a source in OSM because Google's licence doesn't allow it to be used here - it would cause real problems for the project if we were found to be using Google Maps as a source.
If this is somewhere that you are familiar with, then "source=local_knowledge" would be perfectly OK. If not, we'll have to undo this change.

Best Regards
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group
grzegorz75jan (2025-10-30 12:33:05+00:00): Powiedzmy, że wyszła ci ta relacja zbiornika wodnego ale tereny zielone wewnątrz są jakieś ... utopione na mapie. 
Prawdopodobnie brakło https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:place=islet?uselang=pl ale warto też poczytać o wyspie.

Przy okazji nie doklejaj obiektów do dróg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13265771957#map=19/50.132079/20.775087&layers=N sąsiedni węzeł też doklejony.

Po sąsiedzu wator było przynajmniej fragment drogi polnej https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/758523125#map=18/50.130089/20.790979&layers=N przerobić na service
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173972798
pitscheplatsch (2025-10-30 13:38:04+00:00): Hi, thank you for your contribution.

I noticed that in this changeset the street's names were modified to:
name=улица Фрунзе  
name:ru=улица Фрунзе  
name:uk=Слави вулиця

This combination seems inconsistent,  the name and name:ru refer to "Frunze Street" while the Ukrainian name:uk tag ("Слави вулиця") refers to a completely different name ("Street of Glory").

Could you please clarify which name is the current official one?
Dacha2 (2025-10-30 17:49:37+00:00): Официальное название "улица Фрунзе". Как будет на украинском языке я не знаю, поэтому оставил как было.
JJIglesias (2025-10-30 13:07:52+00:00): Saludos. Cual es el Soporte Legal para denominar este segmento de via como F50? las vias F son parte de la Red Vial Fundamental de Bolivia (RVF) y tienen que tener una LEY NACIONAL donde se las incluya, para su administracion por parte de la ABC.

Tienes referencia a esa Ley, cual es la fuente?

Gracias
5m4u9 (2025-11-01 05:01:08+00:00): Solo adicionar al comentario,

Si bien se crean carreteras de la RVF solo por Ley, como por ejemplo, la última hace pocos días (http://gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/verGratis_gob/280853), por algún motivo usan Decretos Supremos para aumentar secciones a carreteras existentes.

Por ejemplo: hoy corregí la incorporación del 2018 de la sección KM13 SCZ-porongo-las cruces-buena vista a la F7 (DS 3480).
user_5359 (2025-10-30 18:40:49+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Thanks for your addition!

You only added the name of a business to the building, but did not note that there is also a business there.  If you do not know the spelling of the tag, please look it up in the wiki https://wiki.osm.org.
Broadstaar (2025-10-30 12:17:29+00:00): added 34 houses
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-31 01:44:12+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/888391458

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:45:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321633 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - United States
JoaoPaixao (2025-10-30 14:47:50+00:00): Boas,

Podes explicar o motivo desta alteração sem qualquer justificativa?
Obrigado
mueschel (2025-10-30 15:17:48+00:00): 23 source tags for the name of a minor residential road is too much. 

It's not meant to provide a full bibliography with author, title, isbn and year of publication.  As the tags are now one can still identify the place you got the information from.

At the very most it would be sufficient to have title and isbn in a single tag, all other information and tags are not necessary.
JoaoPaixao (2025-10-30 15:46:36+00:00): Para cada tag deve existir uma fonte que permita aos restantes colaboradores a validação dessa mesma informação, não necessariamente existirá uma única fonte que abranja toda a informação de múltiplas tags. Se no caso existiam 23, é que porque diziam respeito a informação de fontes distintas.

Conforme está a tag `source:geometry` dificulta mais a validação, visto que a Direção-Geral do Território possui múltiplas imagens de diversos anos.
Quanto à fonte bibliográfica, como existe uma identificação única para este tipo de informação como é o caso do ISBN concordo que isso bastaria.

Sobre a tag `source_ref`, não entendi o porquê desse formato, quanto muito seria `source:ref`. No entanto, para indicar a fonte relativamente à tag `name` é aplicado `source:name`.
Ed_slv (2025-10-30 15:57:06+00:00): "Para cada tag deve existir uma fonte que permita aos restantes colaboradores a validação dessa mesma informação, não necessariamente existirá uma única fonte que abranja toda a informação de múltiplas tags. Se no caso existiam 23, é que porque diziam respeito a informação de fontes distintas."

What about if I use as source "personal knowledge" ?
mueschel (2025-10-30 15:58:46+00:00): There is no requirement to have a source tag for every tag. E.g. imagery is the same throughout a changeset and should be added to the changeset itself, but not to every individual object. 

If my edit to "source:geometry" made it too short, please feel free to add the year back to the tag. 

It's "source_ref": "Used to link external source of information" 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source_ref 
I used the key "source_ref:name" - the reference to the source of the 'name' tag.
JoaoPaixao (2025-10-30 17:17:26+00:00): Ed_slv,
"What about if I use as source "personal knowledge" ?"

Um dos princípios do OSM é a verificabilidade da informação. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Verifiability

Algo como "personal knowledge" é um tipo de fonte sim, contudo não é uma fonte verificável prática e em cenários reais dependendo da atividade do utilizador provavelmente impossível de verificar.
Ed_slv (2025-10-31 19:19:48+00:00): Conhecimento Pessoal e verificação pelos pares são a base de todo o conhecimrnto do OSM. São os requisitos minimos para um elemento figurar no mapa. Tudo o mais é complementar. No OSM tomamos como boa toda e qualquer edição de mapeadores. 
Cumprimentos
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:45:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321633 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - United States
Alliegaytor (2025-11-03 11:08:58+00:00): The correct role for the bus stop in the route relation is "platform" rather than "bus_stop", and it should be ordered rather than appended to the bottom of the route
Alliegaytor (2025-11-03 11:09:53+00:00): Sorry, this was mean to be a comment for this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174135730
user_5359 (2025-10-31 08:37:44+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/13269928990. What is the mean of the tag "nonetwork" = "yes"? It could be network, but yes isn't a correct value for network.
WaffleR_zero (2025-10-30 12:37:22+00:00): Changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173886919
Kovoschiz (2025-10-31 06:56:57+00:00): Please split these changesets. This is difficult to discuss. 
1. Lung Yuet Rd `=primary` is considered for connecting Cornwall St, not Nam Cheong St 
2.  When a road ends at roundabouts, the `=roundabout` currently doesn't use its classification, but the intersected roads
Kovoschiz (2025-10-31 07:17:02+00:00): 1. Ok it's the eastbound that should be adjusted
kingkingHK (2025-10-31 08:06:14+00:00): 2. Why? Traffic to/from the ending road must use the part of the arc immediately before/after, so in terms of functionality they are an extension of the ending road.
Kovoschiz (2025-11-01 08:53:38+00:00): `=roundabout` is treated as one circle.  That's the standard.
kingkingHK (2025-11-02 06:54:07+00:00): "That's the standard" doesn't justify anything.

Hypothetically if the arc between the concerned segments doesn't exist, then the concerned segments are obviously part of the ending road and will get the same classification. Adding back that arc only increases the concerned segment's importance by making it facilitate more traffic, and it doesn't make sense increasing its importance will demote it. Just because the roads are aligned in a circle doesn't mean they all have the same importance.
Kovoschiz (2025-11-02 16:48:32+00:00): Yes, it does. You should think of a good reason to change it first. 
The problem with roundabouts is other arms don't necessarily contribute to it.  
Have you considered `=*_link` as well? Eg Tsing Tsuen Rd. And in Tsing Yi by your logic, the `=primary` should extended from Heung Sze Rd across to Fung Shue Wo Rd to Tsing King Rd, as the `=residential` road doesn't contribute to promoting it. 
For one particular case you should change Ching Cheung Rd to `=tertiary` instead, with the `=secondary_link` left-turn. This further questions how the one to the east connecting Lai Chi Kok Park `=service` road should have at least one section changed (the other has a u-turn back to westbound to access another `=service` road on the `=secondary_link` ).
WaffleR_zero (2025-10-30 12:37:43+00:00): Changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173886919
Fizzie-DWG (2025-11-18 04:30:52+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18972
Leonardo Gutierrez (2025-12-08 16:52:28+00:00): Saludos, 

Las etiquetas que no estan en estandar fueron eliminadas.
Comino (2025-10-30 17:29:48+00:00): Hi,

In your edit, you used many incorrect and deprecated tags.

Street addresses in all capital letters are not allowed; please update it.

Please DELETE the currency:BTC=yes tag (it does not exist).

Please change the name to: To The Moon.

Update the opening hours.
Please use the correct format: https://projets.pavie.info/yohours/

Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag.
Use "currency:XBT=yes" instead.
Please DELETE the payment:ethereum=yes tag.

The description tag reads like an advertisement, which is not allowed. Please update it.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description
The description=* tag can be used to provide additional information about the related element to the end-user of the map. It should be short—a few words or maybe one to three sentences at most. Only neutral and factual information is allowed. Do not include subjective evaluations, for example, "the best restaurant in the city." Do not use the tag for advertising messages.

You are not using the correct phone number syntax; please update it.

For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Merchants#tagging-guidance
and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bitcoin

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
https://btcmap.org/tagger/6794624
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-31 01:44:02+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13270194630

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NeisBot (2025-10-30 12:56:52+00:00): 你好 Jack Kok，欢迎来到 OSM 项目，感谢你的贡献！

为了使合作更容易，并帮助他人理解你的编辑，最好添加对你所做的更改的简要描述。清晰的评论可以帮助社区跟踪你的工作并提供更好的反馈。你可以在这里[1]找到写好评论的提示。
(Auto-translation)
---
Hi Jack Kok, welcome to the OSM projekt and thanks for your contribution!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish
NeisBot (2025-10-30 12:56:55+00:00): 這裡有一個基於你地圖編輯的示例評論：“添加咖啡店，甜點屬性”
(Auto-translation)
---
Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added coffee shop, dessert attributes"
eggie (2025-10-30 14:24:41+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback  In editor iD  kun je ook een BGT achtergrond gebruiken. Dan kun je de wegen en parkeerplaatsen precies uitlijnen.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-10-30 14:39:01+00:00): Wanneer wegen en woningen zijn opgeleverd zou ook de landuse construction kunnen worden aangepast
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:43:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321566 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Russia
WaffleR_zero (2025-10-30 13:08:36+00:00): Changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173886919
WaffleR_zero (2025-10-30 13:09:14+00:00): Changesets: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173886919 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173906547
fortera_au (2025-10-31 02:20:00+00:00): Hi, the parking area in this changeset needs to be drawn correctly, you've left it mis-shapen.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173975606
NeisBot (2025-10-30 13:12:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisBot (2025-10-30 13:12:42+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Kantor kryptowalut w Krakowie"
NeisBot (2025-10-30 13:12:46+00:00): Na przykład, bardziej neutralna i obiektywna wersja Twojego opisu mogłaby brzmieć: "Kantor kryptowalut w Krakowie"
---
(Auto-translation)
grzegorz75jan (2025-10-30 15:22:31+00:00): Rozumiem, że nie każdy edytuje w OSM od kopa ale zamiast klepać wręcz obrzydliwie spam reklamowy w profilu jaki i w edycji to proponuję trochę doczytać.

Proszę usunąć: 

 - zbędny syf reklamowy z profilu użytkownika,
 - popracować nad adresem a na pewno nie pisać nazwy ulicy wielkimi literami od początku do końca. 
 - nr. telefonu - brakuje +48

Po prostu cudo 
UL. ZWIERZYNIECKA 29/113A

Nie powtarzać numeru w
addr:housenumber=29/113A
oraz
addr:street=UL. ZWIERZYNIECKA 29/113A

Tu i ówdzie to się wyświetli jak i też nie ale nie będzie działać zgodnie z oczekiwaniami.

Faktyczna nazwa obiektu taka jak w name czy też marketingowo dodane 
"Kantor kryptowalut Kraków ..."
To że to kantor kryptowalut określają znaczniki (tagi). Jeżeli to Kraków a nie ... Kątownia to wiadomo.

Zawartość znacznika description ograniczyć do przyswajalnego minimum np.
"Prosimy o kontakt telefoniczny przed przybyciem."
 
Tak naprawdę możliwości tego znacznika są sporo mniejsze niż oczekiwania.

Jeżeli nie zobaczymy pozytywnych zmian konto zostanie zgłoszone a obiekt usunięty.
Comino (2025-10-30 17:32:00+00:00): Hi,

In your edit, you used many incorrect and deprecated tags.

Street addresses in all capital letters are not allowed; please update it.

Please DELETE the currency:BTC=yes tag (it does not exist).

Please change the name to: To The Moon.

Update the opening hours.
Please use the correct format: https://projets.pavie.info/yohours/

Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag.
Use "currency:XBT=yes" instead.
Please DELETE the payment:ethereum=yes tag.

The description tag reads like an advertisement, which is not allowed. Please update it.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description
The description=* tag can be used to provide additional information about the related element to the end-user of the map. It should be short—a few words or maybe one to three sentences at most. Only neutral and factual information is allowed. Do not include subjective evaluations, for example, "the best restaurant in the city." Do not use the tag for advertising messages.

You are not using the correct phone number syntax; please update it.

For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Merchants#tagging-guidance
and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bitcoin

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
https://btcmap.org/tagger/6794624
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-31 01:44:03+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13270239504

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NeisReview (2025-11-01 19:13:23+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/174018382

Thanks, Comino.
Fraxi (2025-10-30 13:26:47+00:00): Здравейте!
Благодаря за промените!
Когато има освободен обект(както явно е в случая с мебелна къща "Явор"), не е необходимо да се изтрива цялата точка, защото с това се изтриват и таговете и историята. Може при наличие на освободен(shop=vacant) или занемарен(disused:shop=*) обект  да замените неактуалните тагове с тези, които ви дадох в скоби. И ако на мястото им се нанесат нови търговски обекти, просто да се заменят таговете.
mechka (2025-10-30 19:38:15+00:00): Благодаря за коментара! Сега разбирам какво да направя и ще променя таговете, вместо да изтривам точката.
fortera_au (2025-10-31 02:19:04+00:00): Hi, you've dragged a node and disconnected two buildings that are actually connected, I've reverted this changeset. Please ensure that you don't map incorrectly just to fix a MapRoulette problem.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173976061
fortera_au (2025-10-31 02:20:56+00:00): Revert incorrect fixes done as part of a MapRoulette challenge

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174001213
fortera_au (2025-10-31 02:18:00+00:00): Hi, these buildings would likely still be intersecting as they are still overlapping. The Priceline probably needs to be changed to not be tagged as a standalone building, either with indoor mapping tags or by removing the building tag.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173976219
fayor (2025-10-30 15:09:09+00:00): Salve, l'attività non va aggiunta sul civico ma mappata con nodo a parte con apposito tag. Ho provveduto aggiungendo alcune informazioni trovare in rete.
eleguaia (2025-10-30 17:35:38+00:00): Ah ok. Quindi ora è sistemato. Ma è collegata anche alla posizione di Google Maps o è diverso? Quando sarà visibile inoltre su Facebook o Instagram la posizione? Grazie mille
fayor (2025-10-30 18:56:14+00:00): No, i dati di Openstreetmap non sono collegati a Google e a Facebook/Instagram
fortera_au (2025-10-31 02:16:29+00:00): Hi, you've removed a significant amount of information with this, as well as incorrectly drawn these buildings as one. I'll revert this change, please make sure you don't remove valid information just to fix a MapRoulette challenge.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173976326
fortera_au (2025-10-31 02:20:57+00:00): Revert incorrect fixes done as part of a MapRoulette challenge

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174001213
NeisBot (2025-10-30 13:27:44+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Kantor kryptowalut w Bielsko Biała"
NeisBot (2025-10-30 13:27:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisBot (2025-10-30 13:27:49+00:00): Na przykład, bardziej neutralna i obiektywna wersja Twojego opisu mogłaby brzmieć: "Kantor kryptowalut w Bielsku-Białej"
---
(Auto-translation)
NeisReview (2025-11-01 19:10:22+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/174018335
ilias_ (2025-10-30 14:13:06+00:00): Le boulevard se termine sur des escaliers? C'est-à-dire que si les voitures suivent les indications d'OpenStreetMap, ils finiront dans les escaliers?
marktechratp (2025-10-30 15:36:28+00:00): ça peut apparaître bizarre, mais réellement c'est exactement ce qu'il y a pour l'instant, en attendant ce qu'ils vont rajouter
Sakari_N (2025-10-30 19:21:02+00:00): Moi,

Mielenkiintoinen kyltti maanomistajalta. Moottoriajoneuvoilla ajo maastossa on nyt on lähtökohtaisesti kielletty ilman kylttiäkin, joten tämä varmaan koskee lähinnä pyöräilyä.

Pyöräilyä metsässä (samoin kuin kävelyä) ei mielestäni voi kieltää jos kyseessä ei ole luonnosuojelualue, kansallispuisto, hylkeidensuojelualue tai muu vastaava.
dododont (2025-10-31 16:48:57+00:00): Kyltissä lukee "ajaminen maastossa kielletty, ml. pyörät" ja "vahingonkorvausvelvollisuuden uhalla".

Vaikea kysymys. Itse en osaa arvioida miten vakava uhka esim. juurikääpä on, ja minkälaisia taloudellisia vahinkoja siitä aiheutuu. Sitä kyllä epäilen, että pyöräily (poislukien sähköpyörät) tekisi enempää vahinkoa kuin kävely. Ehkäpä joku tapaus pitäisi koestaa siviilioikeudessa.
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:43:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321566 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Russia
cyclist789 (2026-03-20 12:57:52+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5771210959
I just checked, and there is no foot path west of this dead end. That segment is overgrown with weeds, and there's a high wire fence.
Can I remove that footpath?
AE35 (2026-03-21 18:41:52+00:00): Sure - please remove when you know this path is not there anymore.
best regards
cyclist789 (2026-03-23 08:00:49+00:00): Thanks. 👍
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:43:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321566 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Russia