piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
slice0 (2024-01-24 00:20:24+00:00): @woodpeck im not legally wrong, but as you put it this is a huge "err on the side of caution"
slice0 (2024-01-24 00:27:22+00:00): @woodpeck can you show me where I am wrong please, here is the SA copyright law https://lawhandbook.sa.gov.au/ch11s01.php
woodpeck (2024-01-24 00:50:18+00:00): I won't "pretend to be a lawyer". OSM is not in the business of interpreting copyright law; we simply don't use content unless we (a) have personally done the survey, or (b) have permission - either directly from the owner or where the owner has put their stuff under a license that is compatible with OSM.
slice0 (2024-01-24 00:58:36+00:00): thats a much better answer than simply saying im wrong, OSM definitely is cautious about using data sources and I have always respected that.
aharvey (2024-01-24 04:20:45+00:00): > OSM definitely is cautious about using data sources and I have always respected that

did you end up reverting those SA speed cameras you added from these non-compatible sources you mentioned at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/2021-April/014539.html , honest question I couldn't find a response to the original thread.
aharvey (2024-01-24 04:38:22+00:00): fortera just pointed out that this source is on data.sa.gov.au and therefore falls under the existing DataSA waiver.
slice0 (2024-01-24 04:47:58+00:00): @aharvey not only that at the bottom of the SAPOL website the information is released under CC 4.0, also I have been to every single one of them in person. and also if you have any issue with any of my edits and copyright issue please email the DWG instead of discussing on a changeset comment thread that has nothing to do with speed cameras other than you wanting attention which I dont have time for.
fortera_au (2024-01-24 05:00:57+00:00): The license on their website ic CC-BY 4.0, which means attribution is required. We can't provide that directly so we need a waiver (like we have for DataSA) that states attribution through the Wiki is acceptable instead of direct attribution where we use the data.
slice0 (2024-01-24 05:07:10+00:00): @fortera no information from the SAPOL website is used on OSM anyway, I use the list as a check list which I converted to a excel speradsheet and placed the nodes on OSM based on my on surveys in person.
slice0 (2024-01-24 05:09:47+00:00): and please email the DWG if you wish to discuss further I wont be responding here anymore about my own changesets.
fortera_au (2024-01-24 05:12:14+00:00): I was just pointing out how CC-BY alone isn't enough for OSM and how we require the waiver.
aTarom (2024-01-23 09:03:27+00:00): Hola, gracias por editar, ten en cuenta zonas bilingües, por ejemplo:
Camino de Serra Llarga a Torre Guilera
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1009073641/history
Camino de BV-5119 a Canyelles
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/931920774/history
Camino de Serra de Can Vilatort a Molí de les Cadires
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/931923542/history
Camino de Coll de la Mosquera a Turó del Morou
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1004737338/history

Cambiados a "Camí ..."

Saludos
kapazao (2024-01-23 13:14:43+00:00): Gracias por el comentario y la corrección.
Se podrían revisar los elementos que se llamen Camino en las comunidades de habla catalana y corregir a Camí, añadiendo el name:ca y name:es según sea. Cuando me sea posible lo reviso.
Un saludo
Andry1983 (2024-01-22 15:57:54+00:00): is it approve?
Fizzie-DWG (2024-01-23 00:39:48+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146573878
Theo J Fagundes (2024-01-22 16:22:49+00:00): Sorry about no city did best ;) ?
Branko Kokanovic (2024-01-22 16:38:03+00:00): sorry, I don't understand, can you clarify?
Theo J Fagundes (2024-01-22 16:24:47+00:00): ola ta chegar
Jrachi (2024-01-23 07:45:14+00:00): Ciao.
Fai attenzione a modificare i membri di una relazione con iD.
Hai ribaltato l'ordine dei primi tre membri!
Ho già corretto io.

Ivo, Jrachi
PaoloLombardi (2024-01-26 13:09:25+00:00): Ciao grazie mille!
Purtroppo capita di trovare strade che sono disegnate male ma hanno già una relazione.
Ogni volta che correggo con un "taglia e cuci" probabilmente salta qualcosa nella relazione che però non credo sia risolvibile su ID.
L'unica soluzione per chi crea le relazioni è sincerarsi prima che qualsiasi highway sia disegnata bene.
Da parte mia cerco di fare quello che posso ma esclusivamente con ID perché più pratico se usato su diversi Pc.
Un saluto.
NeisBot (2024-01-23 07:47:27+00:00): #RemoveTestdata

Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146580100
NeisBot (2024-01-23 07:40:11+00:00): #RemoveTestdata
Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146580030
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-22 16:10:24+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2779604159
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/104652412

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
MxxCon (2024-02-04 07:12:44+00:00): What's the #purpose #of #writing #every #word #as #hashtag?

If you want to add certain hashtags, changeset have a separate field for that.
But unless there's a specific reason for them, please write changeset comments as normal messages to help others understand what you are doing.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146559979
questfinder (2024-02-04 15:00:53+00:00): Thanks for your review; you can check the DC. I'm not reworking anything; I have visited these addresses and used the NJ Bureau of GIS as source. I have already created this location with the appropriate tags as per OSM Wiki. Not to waste my time, go ahead and update all my work. YOU ARE WELCOME.
MxxCon (2024-02-04 15:36:40+00:00): This is not what I asked you about...
SpinOff (2024-01-22 19:43:04+00:00): Z highway=path nie mogą korzystać samochody. Na pewno tak chciałeś to oznaczyć?
1x2upus (2024-02-04 19:19:37+00:00): Hej, tam jest jeden dom. To Budynek lesnictwa. Moze zmienic na residental?
SpinOff (2024-02-07 17:26:39+00:00): Drogi dojazdowe do pojedynczych zabudowań to zwykle highway=service. Zaznacz tak fragment który służy do dojazdu do tej posesji.

Reszta, jeśli jest używana tylko w celu dojazdu do lasu może być highway=path albo highway=track. Jeżeli droga jest na tyle szeroka że może po niej przejechać samochód albo traktor, to raczej highway=track.
Fedurli (2024-02-11 00:35:26+00:00): I nomi erano già stati corretti da me, senza il termine "Borgata" non presente nella cartellonistica e in altri documenti ufficiali. Ti invito a modificare i luoghi che conosci e soprattutto ad astenerti a toccare i nameplace, visto i danni che stai facendo sulla mappa. Grazie.
Ma siamo all'ennesima ripetizione di questo messaggio.
NeisBot (2024-01-23 07:39:28+00:00): #RemoveTestdata
Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146580014
MichS (2024-01-25 06:05:39+00:00): Hallo,

bitte Telefonnummern nach dem Schema https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:phone
eintragen.

Bitte korrigieren.

MFG
JuanjoMC (2024-01-22 19:54:00+00:00): Hi,

I may be wrong but, it seems to me that this polygon (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/243559628) is representing two different buildings. One of them is part of UGC De Brouckère cinema and shouln't have been demolished.

Cheers
bxl-forever (2024-01-22 20:06:47+00:00): You are right, I have probably too hazily assumed the entire building had been demolished, though only the part behind the other building is gone.  I’ll change it.
NeisBot (2024-01-22 20:31:03+00:00): Hello Ag mc, thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.

Thanks!

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
karpaga (2024-10-12 22:11:12+00:00): Buenas, estoy viendo que en este conjunto de cambios has corregido un nombre de un negocio que había creado yo. Estoy revisando el nombre que yo puse y tu corrección y no veo diferencia. (Este es el nodo 10595132969). Solamente quiero saberlo para aprender a no volver a tener el mismo fallo.
Gracias.
kapazao (2024-10-16 12:25:57+00:00): Hola, en tu caso el nombre tenía 2 espacios justo antes de AXA y se corrigió a 1 como en el resto de casos en este conjunto de cambios.
Un saludo
Warin61 (2024-01-30 06:52:34+00:00): When you make a multipolygon relation the members do not have to be new blank ways - you can use existing ways no matter what tags they use;
An existing building can be used as an inner in the relation
A lake could be used as an inner .. or even an outer.
and many other things.. they can all be used in the relation ... 

This reduces your work load AND reduces data bloat in OSM.
HaPe-CZ (2024-01-31 08:36:51+00:00): Hi, yes, that's right. But it causes other problems. Sometimes the edge of the object is not drawn but only the fill colors, sometimes the inserted object is not separated properly, etc.
For example, ... https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1243799275 ... here the object is inserted directly, and subsequently the outline is lost.
Warin61 (2024-02-01 09:57:59+00:00): That is a rendering issue. 
The example you gave looks to be correctly rendered. The 'edge' of a park does not appear to be drawn - just the 'fill' .. see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/388948281.

A 'national park' is tagged as a boundary and is drawn as a line around the outside - no fill. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6110851
HaPe-CZ (2024-02-01 10:23:47+00:00): My God, that was just an example. The objects are indeed rendered differently (probably a bug in the inerpreter). The pedestrian zone area nonsensically overlays buildings and other areas. That's why the cutout in its area. It's pointless to divide the area into several smaller areas and draw the embedded objects, when it is possible to make the embedding in the area to make them visible.
Is there actually a green area (e.g. grass) in the area? Yes there is, therefore it must be visible or not?
Warin61 (2024-02-01 10:42:45+00:00): We map and tag in OSM. The renders draw the way they want to, they can exclude some things etc. We map and tag according to the 'rules' what the renders do is up to them ... 

The 'green areas' are used  by pedestrians, so they are part of the pedestrian are as are the roof area - people walk under than for shade.. 

If you object to way something is drawn - take it up with the renders.
HaPe-CZ (2024-02-01 11:32:43+00:00): Pedestrians don't walk on the grass here but around :D, hence the grass as a visible area.
Rendering is just solved by cutting out the area and inserting an object into it. This is common knowledge, and a good editor knows it, another editor doesn't understand it and wonders. That's why the "cut out" options exist.
If you object, at least don't destroy the maps.
HaPe-CZ (2024-02-01 11:35:03+00:00): After your hit, half of the roofs and lawns will remain invisible on the map, half will be displayed. What's right? All rooftops and lawns exist. But according to your map, only some of them exist. Isn't that stupid?
matheusgomesms (2024-01-22 19:17:21+00:00): Olá Theo, poderia explicar suas edições, por gentileza? Parece que você está adicionando coisas que não existem, tanto em terra quanto no mar.

Se precisar de ajuda estamos disponíveis para ajudar. Temos um canal no Telegram também.
Fizzie-DWG (2024-01-23 00:40:12+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15604
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-22 16:50:28+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11540413846

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Timmy_Tesseract (2024-01-25 02:30:55+00:00): If a fee needs to be paid to use a road or to pass a gate you can use the tag toll=yes.

In this example, does everybody need to be pay the fee including residents of Tierra Benita? Or is this more of a bribe for the guard to let vehicles without sticker pass through?

By the way, is there a road connection at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8318434630 ? On aerial imagery i looks like there is no proper connection, or maybe only passable on foot/bicycle.
AntMadeira (2024-01-22 19:12:48+00:00): Olá,  the_perigoso.
Vi que adicionaste esta e outra casa a uma relação de fronteira administrativa. Algum motivo especial para o teres feito?

Cumprimentos,
António Madeira.
the_perigoso (2024-07-22 11:18:36+00:00): Olá António, esta mensagem passou despercebida, desculpa.

Terá sido acidentalmente.

Cumprimentos
MxxCon (2024-01-25 02:12:35+00:00): Hello.
Are you sure about this biz name? They changed their name to just Burlington in 2009..
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146561817
emersonveenstra (2024-01-23 14:14:03+00:00): Hi there,

For river areas like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1241986036#map=18/44.46205/-110.82813, the correct tagging is "natural=water"+"water=river", not "waterway=river" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:water%3Driver#How_to_map)

Would you mind fixing these? Thanks!
surveyor54 (2024-01-22 19:04:59+00:00): Hi,
Post wird schön seit längerem nicht mehr separat als "post_office" getaggt, sondern als post_office=post_partner  an den Laden in dem sich die Poststelle befindet.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity=post%20office?uselang=de

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10637143369

Gruß
surveyor54
rabon (2024-01-23 13:37:28+00:00): Oh danke, das war mir nicht bewusst. Asche auf mein Haupt. post_office = post_partner wird in meiner App OsmAND nicht gerendert, deshalb nicht sichtbar, außer wenn man nach "Post" sucht.

Gruß
surveyor54 (2024-01-23 20:53:51+00:00): Man kann auch nicht immer auf dem Neusten sein.
silversurfer83 (2024-01-22 18:46:52+00:00): hi there :)

please don't add the same info to a node (point) AND the building outline that is around that node.

Please use a node to represent the POI (like the pharmacy) and put only the info belonging to the brick and mortar on the way of the building. Thank you.

Questions? Shoot :)

silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146562088
daganzdaanda (2024-02-02 13:58:41+00:00): Hallo Kuliku97,
willkommen bei OpenStreetMap, danke, dass du die Karte verbessern hilfst!

Das Sozialkaufhaus ist schon weiter nördlich eingetragen, da wo auch der Eingang ist.
Im Süden des Gebäudes ist meines Wissens immer noch die Tafel untergebracht, siehe https://www.caritas-aichach-friedberg.de/aichacher-tafel/

Bist du dir sicher, dass die innerhalb des Gebäudes umgezogen sind?

Servus, daganzdaanda
ZeLonewolf (2024-01-22 17:40:46+00:00): In previous changeset discussions, mappers reached out to you pointing out the problematic mapping practice of aligning landcover to parcel lines.  Please stop doing this.  As it is we will have to do a bulk revert of much of this work to correct it.  It takes much less time to revert changesets than it does to make them in the first place (basically, you make a list of the changeset IDs, drop them into the revert tool, and seconds later they're gone from the map). So it is in everyone's interest for you to stop what you're doing and to engage with the community (community.openstreetmap.org United States forum or slack.openstreetmap.us #local-connecticut or #tagging channels).

Ultimately you are going to waste a lot of your time and some of others' time with edits that will get removed at the push of a button.
mueschel (2024-01-27 15:27:49+00:00): Hi,
could you check the trees for uncommon tags?

 ncc_tree_code = 158320
  site_tree_no = 15.00
-> reference numbers should use the "ref:XYZ" syntax.


  sitename = Middleton Boulevard   
-> seems to be a likely unnecessary object:addr or location 

tree_type
-> should be denotation
SK53 (2024-01-28 18:55:55+00:00): Yes, well caught : site_tree_no, sitename & tree_type should not be there. The ncc_tree_code is not necessarily a "ref" in OSM terms (it is not the same as the markers on the trees) and is there to allow checks for new trees etc.
jmapb (2024-07-07 03:31:46+00:00): I clearly remember seeing a "no motorcycles" rule in place at one time, but I haven't been able to find it since. Was this signed at the cemetery?
TheBestIdea (2024-07-08 14:54:13+00:00): Yup, there were signs up when I went
Waldemar Isbrecht (2024-10-31 10:53:43+00:00): Maybe don't delete the path, but tag it appropriately. I can clearly see a path here. But was wondering why it's been deleted. Just leave it in the database and tag it appropriately!
Luzandro (2024-11-05 17:23:14+00:00): it also appears on governmental maps and is clearly visible on recent aerial images or the strava heatmap from last year. If it's destroyed or access is restricted, tag it accordingly, otherwise it will most likely just get added again by someone else sooner or later without that information.

https://maps.bev.gv.at/#/center/10.4749,47.4623/zoom/16

https://stp.wien.gv.at/basemap/#{"center":[1165750.5787366698,6018015.910864846],"zoom":17.779051042157594,"rotation":0,"layers":"1000000000"}

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property#Why_deleting_paths_is_not_the_solution

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
Waldemar Isbrecht (2024-11-05 19:30:58+00:00): My point exactly. Thanks.
PPete2 (2026-05-06 09:29:22+00:00): Path is present in nature and people also used it during the last year regarding Strava-Heatmap, so I reverted this CS. But you are free to adapt tags like sac_scale or trail_visibility instead.
balint36 (2024-01-27 10:50:32+00:00): akarom mondani, kerékpáros
Supaplex030 (2024-01-22 20:58:04+00:00): Hallo wakest, danke für die Ergänzung der Öffnungszeiten hier bei den "Drei Flaschen"!

Du hast außerdem die Café-Nutzung ergänzt, in dem du "amenity=bar;cafe" gesetzt hast. Von der Verwendung von Aufzählungen/Semikolon in Tags wie "amenity" wird stark abgeraten, da diese Schreibweise von den meisten Anwendungen nicht interpretiert wird und der Ort daher in vielen Karten und Anwendungen quasi verschwinden würde.

Üblicherweise entscheidet man sich dann beim Tagging für eine der beiden, möglichst die scheinbar "überwiegende" Nutzung. Was meinst du also: Eher Bar, oder eher Café? ;) Dem äußeren Anschein nach würde ich bei "Bar" bleiben, auch wenn ich den Laden nicht kenne...

Beste Grüße
Alex
wakest (2024-01-24 13:25:23+00:00): I changed it back to a Bar for now, but this place is explicitly both a bar and cafe. I think maybe a new category is needed or some change in OSM tagging because there are many places that are both a cafe *and* a bar.
wakest (2024-01-24 13:25:47+00:00): Thank you for your message though I appreciate you looking out!
Supaplex030 (2024-01-24 19:22:54+00:00): Sometimes mappers simply use two points in such a case: One as a bar, and one as a café ^^ But that's not an optimal solution either...
Unfortunately, this is just an unsolved problem in OSM...
daganzdaanda (2024-02-02 14:18:52+00:00): Hallo Kuliku97,
danke fürs Update! 

Es schaut jetzt aber ein wenig merkwürdig aus... ;-)

Was ist an der Stelle vom abgerissenen Gebäude gerade? Ich habe gelesen, dass der Parkplatz dahin vergrößert werden sollte, ist das schon so weit? Dann könntest du den vorhandenen Parkplatz vergrößern. Wenn da noch eine Baustelle ist, kannst du die auch eintragen. Das alte Gebäude ist ja noch auf den Luftbildern sichtbar, deshalb wäre eine Kennzeichnung mit sowas wie "removed:building=supermarket" für andere Mapper hilfreich. (Um beliebige Tags eingeben zu können, musst du beim iD unten das "Eigenschaften" Feld aufklappen). 

Das neue Gebäude hast du über die alten Straßen und Dächer / Gebäude eingetragen. Die gibts aber nicht mehr, oder? Dann kannst du die auch entfernen. 

Nochmal Danke für die Mitarbeit, und weiter viel Spaß beim Mappen! 

Bei Fragen helf ich gern, oder schau ins Forum: https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/de/56

Servus, daganzdaanda
Azharul Islam Anik (2024-05-08 19:11:30+00:00): No building exists here now.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146563373
limes11 (2024-01-23 18:55:42+00:00): Moin

schau hier bitte nochmal. Der Radweg auf der anderen Seite ist in beiden Richtungen benutzungspflichtig. Dann kann dieser hier am Netto nicht bicycle=designated sein. Nicht mal bicycle=yes.

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=52.42083475211601&lng=13.822977661631967&z=18.80222553326308&focus=photo&pKey=138689045044633

VG
Langlaeufer (2024-01-23 19:02:22+00:00): Doch, geht, weil sie führen nicht zum gleichen Ziel. Es gibt keine verbindung am Ende zwischen beiden.
Langlaeufer (2024-01-23 19:05:03+00:00): Du darfst aber gerne einen Fußweg daraus machen, wenn es dich glücklich macht.
limes11 (2024-01-23 19:15:38+00:00): Naja, es ist halt einfach falsch. Das Stück 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/860441284

ist niemals designated. Da ist ein kleines Schild, welches Radfahrer hinweist, links abzubiegen, um auf der anderen Seite weiterzufahren. 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/305684106

Naja, das ist Geschmackssache. Fakt ist, designated ist eine unnötige Verwirrung der Router
Langlaeufer (2024-01-23 19:29:34+00:00): Verstehe nicht was Router an der stelle verwirren soll?

Ich merke gerade use-sidepath muss noch von der Straße bis zur Ausfahrt, weil da darf ich ja mit dem Rad rausfahren.
Langlaeufer (2024-01-23 19:42:44+00:00): Router schauen nur ob man da fahren 
 darf, mehr Wirkung hat designated oder yes meist nicht. 

Elektrokleinstfahrzeuge müssen übrigens alle (auch nicht- benutzungspflichtige) Radwege nutzen. Gehwege mit Radverkehr frei (239+1022-10) sind hingegen tabu.  Das könne die Router jetzt nicht mehr erkennen.
woodpeck (2024-02-07 14:45:24+00:00): Dear BigKev97, when you revert a changeset please: (1) make an effort to comment on the original changeset that has introduced the error, and explain to the mapper what they did wrong so they can do better next time. (2) In your revert changeset, explain the reason for revert, which may also be a pointer to your comment in (1).
BigKev97 (2024-02-22 23:07:13+00:00): The mapper change the from "Hamlet" category to "Residential area" category for "Urbanización La Comarca". The letters from the "Residential area" are too small to be visible from the map. It has to be a "Hamlet" category to make more visible.
BigKev97 (2024-02-22 23:10:21+00:00): Here's the link: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146330133#map=19/18.20856/-66.09702
Igor Bubelov (2024-01-23 00:24:12+00:00): Hi! 

FYI: The OSM uses YYYY-MM-DD date format, I'll fix it for this place
Rupemm (2024-01-23 09:04:20+00:00): Hi Igor, thank you very much
Filip009 (2024-01-23 08:36:53+00:00): Zdravím, super, že pridávate do mapy obchody a prevádzky. Do bodu je ale zbytočné pridávať adresu, keďže vyhľadávače si ju preberajú z budovy. Do budúcnosti teda adresu, pokiaľ na budove je, nemusíte pridávať aj na bod :)
miron70 (2024-01-25 08:23:51+00:00): Dik za upozornenie, som novacik v mapovani, takze sa snazim vzdy pri bode vlozit co najviac info co viem :-)
Filip009 (2024-01-25 09:54:33+00:00): Práve preto by som tom nenazval upozornením, ale usmernením ;)
Ale inak super práca, len tak ďalej. Odporúčam vyskúšať aplikáciu StreetComplete do mobilu, s ktorou sa tieto informácie dajú pridávať priamo na mieste, alebo minimálne je to intuitívnejšie ako v prehliadači.
miron70 (2024-01-25 12:45:54+00:00): Apku StreetComplete som si dal do mobilu - super, take nieco som hladal do mobilu, dik za tip.