piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2024-05-24 11:14:36+00:00): Voorlopig routeert het weer voor fietsers /voetgangers via de zuidzijde vanaf de KNRM tot de rotonde. CTRL F5 voor het effect op de kaart.
Laatste bruikbare sat foto maart 2024
https://www.satellietdataportaal.nl/?base=openstreetmap&res=0.3%2C0.5&datemin=24-05-2023&loc=53.40701%2C6.201898%2C19z&overlay=mos-0&marker=loc&acqdate=2024-03-02&acqid=20240302_112147_SVNEO-02&sensor=SuperView-NEO

Gr eggie
aixbrick (2024-05-24 10:26:51+00:00): Hello,
you split the road into two separate ways, but without adding a "oneway" tag, changing the lane count and adjusting the bus routes. Would you please correct that?
Regards
aixbrick (2024-06-02 08:55:55+00:00): No reaction, corrected with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152149992.
eggie (2024-05-24 08:51:28+00:00): Commentaar moet zijn weg losgekoppeld van landuse
windharp (2024-05-27 14:11:17+00:00): Why did you change the complete parking lot to permissive, the sign states it as a Bosch company parking lot?
offissa (2024-05-27 19:24:39+00:00): Yes, it is a private parking lot (parking for employees only), but it is open for public foot, bike and car access (how else are you supposed to reach the public charging stations?). I feel "permissive" is the correct value, because according to the wiki "On non-public roads / elements
permissive [equals] Open to general traffic [...]." and "private [equals] General public access is not allowed." Which is not the case here.
Frank Bielig (2024-05-24 20:00:04+00:00): Could you explain the goal of your changes, please? The border of South Sudan looks quite broken now.
PulisakZ (2024-05-24 21:01:15+00:00): Actual creator for broken relation is user "The Nalimaakono" on changeset
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151746904

I have managed to fixed Kenya and Uganda. 
And, there are a lot more broken relations to be fixed: South Sudan, Kapoeta North, Kapoeta South, Karenga  ...
Frank Bielig (2024-05-24 21:14:36+00:00): Thank you very much. I appreciate your efforts. Obviously I have stepped into your ongoing work.
NorthCrab (2024-05-25 04:44:32+00:00): South Sudan is broken too https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1656678
Flynn Marquardt (2024-05-25 11:52:48+00:00): I fixed/restored South Sudan, it validates now again in JOSM.
NorthCrab (2024-05-25 14:54:42+00:00): Thanks a lot :-)!
PulisakZ (2024-05-25 18:48:37+00:00): Thank you Flynn Marquardt !
PulisakZ (2024-05-25 19:22:43+00:00): Fixed: Kapoeta South, Kapoeta North, Torit, Kidepo Valley National Park, Didinga & Larim, Ikotos, Karenga and Lafon.
silversurfer83 (2024-05-24 13:17:37+00:00): Herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap :)

danke, dass du den Hinweis bearbeitet hast.

Falls du Fragen zu OSM hast, immer raus damit. Ich bin idR ein paar km weiter östlich aktiv :)

Ansonsten kann ich dir empfehlen dich ein wenig im Wiki (wiki.osm.org) umzusehen und wünsche weiter viel Spaß an der Karte

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151759163
yelisey90 (2024-05-24 10:17:57+00:00): Really?! Wow!
Jordi MF (2024-05-24 14:41:45+00:00): ¿Podrías explicar qué significa 'su español de toda la vida'? ¿Qué clase de español es ese?
Bendita Moreira (2024-06-13 13:48:55+00:00): hello mr.akuksouski_lyft based to my observation your mapping looks good so keep going it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151759794
rhhs (2025-03-08 09:14:52+00:00): I saw you added postal codes to every node in a building. In general it is not necessary to add postal codes because software using OSM data can easily determine it from the location of the building. But if you add postal codes, you should add them to the building area, not the nodes in it.
Bogomil Shopov - Бого (2025-04-09 11:58:21+00:00): Understood. Thanks for letting me know!
tntchn (2024-05-24 10:00:59+00:00): 似乎因為 Bing 2017 年左右的空照圖，造成關廟地區的道路向西偏了大概 5m，與後來的地址資料對不太齊，本次變更集參考 NLSC Open Data、既有台南市地址資料、新版 Bing 空照圖及村里界圖互相參考，調整歪的太嚴重的道路
Bendita Moreira (2024-06-13 13:48:29+00:00): hello akuksouski_lyft based to my observation your mapping looks good so keep going it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151760808
ddbb07 (2024-08-16 15:28:03+00:00): Den här ändringsuppsättningen tog bort "public_transport:platform" taggar från buss stationer, enligt OSM wiki ska alla typer av lokaltrafik vara taggad med "public_transport:platform". Finns det någon särskild anledning för de ändringarna eller ska jag till dem igen?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:public%20transport=platform
Snusmumriken (2024-08-16 16:04:11+00:00): Hej

I Stockholm/SL taggar man enligt den förenklade modellen
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sv:Sverige/Kollektivtrafik#F.C3.B6renklad_PT-taggning_f.C3.B6r_bussar
Där ingår inte public_transport=platform
ddbb07 (2024-08-17 11:00:55+00:00): Tack för informationen
dgitto (2024-05-26 23:12:11+00:00): Benvenuto in OSM.
Come puoi vedere ovunque in Italia, i nomi delle strade e i toponimi in generale iniziano per maiuscola.
Puoi leggere qualcosa qua:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Editing_Standards_and_Conventions#Nomi_delle_strade
miluethi (2024-05-25 13:12:26+00:00): Vinita, your buildings shapes are far too big. I'm deleting them.

Please narrow down the building to match the satellite imagery.
zorglubu (2024-05-24 17:34:34+00:00): Bonjour Marin777, et bienvenue sur OpenStreetMap.

Pense à sauvegarder tes modifications "avant" de changer de ville ou de région, car il est sinon très difficile de bien voir ce qui a été fait. Voir le rectangle orange sur la carte à droite.

Les contributions sont bonnes mais des nœuds avaient été déplacés certainement par erreur. J'ai corrigé.

Si un magasin est à ajouter dans un bâtiment existant, il est préférable de mettre simplement un nœud (un point) et de lui mettre les bons attributs. Merci.

Une astuce : pour rendre rectangulaire le contour d'un terrain de sport, ou d'autre chose, il suffit de faire un clic droit sur le contour puis sélectionner le bouton "rectangle".

Merci encore pour tes contributions, et bonne continuation avec OSM :-)
Deghamna24000 (2024-05-24 10:35:37+00:00): بالظبط
Zainab Ramadhanis (2024-05-28 14:07:17+00:00): Hi, awesome job! thanks for mapping! but just a bit reminder to align the road with satellite imagery
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151761684
miluethi (2024-05-25 13:28:20+00:00): DShan01,
I'm deleting all your buildings shapes in Nicaragua.

The buildings are far too big, often including several buildings pretty far apart for each other.

Some buildings have useless names like "Edificio". Don't name buildings except for specific names.

Don't add crappy triangle buildings.

If you don't like to contribute to OSM, then don't do it!
dypa (2024-05-24 11:44:22+00:00): Почему вы удалили местные топонимы?
Константин Гам (2024-05-24 16:16:24+00:00): Местные топонимы? А можно источник? Таких топонимов напридумывать можно сотню... Но как то ценность их не ясна.
miluethi (2024-05-25 13:15:22+00:00): Vinitia,
I contacted you before. I'm deleting your buildings you created in OSM Nicaragua for the following reasons:

- nearly all shapes are far too big.
- the shapes are not squared out with the "Q" key
- you added weird shapes like triangles.
canfe (2024-08-18 08:43:17+00:00): Natural cliff non è concesso come area.
Ti prego di vederti i tag in wiki dato che stai mappando in montagna dove pochi fanno controllo di qualità.
E' stato rimosso
SI PREGA DI RISPONDERE
Vinber-Pro (2024-05-27 06:54:42+00:00): Bonjour,
il n'y a plus de rézopouce c'est cela ?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6506410051/history

bonne journée
NeisBot (2024-05-24 10:40:02+00:00): Hi Tomokino, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/157248774

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
infeeeee (2024-05-24 11:07:31+00:00): Reverted. It's a fishing lake, not a beach

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151763652
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-24 11:25:33+00:00): @infeeeee , thanks!
Vinber-Pro (2024-05-25 15:09:54+00:00): bonjour,
j'ai remplacé les https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:craft=window_construction par des window=yes (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:window) pour indiquer l'emplacement des fenêtres

à voir ce que cela donne en 3d par la suite !

bonne journée
MxxCon (2024-05-26 05:40:07+00:00): Hello.
Instead of outright deleting a closed biz node, it's much better to use lifecycle prefix tags as documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
Doing that not only preserves history of this object, if there's ever a need to refer to it later, but it still allows this address to be searchable and routable. Just because a biz closed doesn't mean that address is gone too.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151762534
dermapper (2024-05-26 10:16:42+00:00): Hi, I added back the restaurant in changeset: 151844021

Thank you for bringing this to my attention!
Gregory Peony (2024-07-05 01:17:07+00:00): Building footprints inaccurate; Multiple buildings mapped using one footprint, redundant nodes in footprints, etc.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151762971
empty_child (2024-05-24 22:36:38+00:00): Please, leave comments to changesets. I don't have excessive desire to check every edit in OSMCha. Thanks in advance
Frans S (2024-07-20 10:03:56+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
You changed the tagging of a highway=tertiary into a path !!
Why?  It is at least a residential road.
I correct it.
Best regards
infeeeee (2024-05-24 11:27:10+00:00): Szia!

wheelchair=* értékének ezek közül az egyiket használd: yes/no/limited

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hu:Key:wheelchair

Ha plusz  információt szeretnél hozzáadni, részletsebben kifejteni, azt a wheelchair:description címkében adhatod hozzá magyarul: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wheelchair:description

Angol nyelven a wheelchair:description:en címkét használd - ez az összes szabadszavas címkére igaz, hogy az alapértelmezett az adott ország hivatalos nyelve

Ha kérdésed merülne fel, a magyar szerkesztő közösség elérhetőségeit megtalálod ezen az oldalon: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hungary/Közösség

További jó térképezést!
jbcharron (2025-12-07 08:42:27+00:00): Hello,
Est ce que ce chemin est vraiment un sentier équestre ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/144736217/history
Jean-Baptiste
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-10 02:13:14+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164748082
Gregory Peony (2024-07-27 02:13:46+00:00): Hello, do you know what is causing the features I flagged to have excess nodes? Otherwise, the imagery allows for buidling footprints to be more accurate, sometimes multiple buildings are enveloped by one footprint, and buildings are oversized because the wall (which is visible in off nadir imagery) has been included in them.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151764176
Fraxi (2024-05-24 11:32:22+00:00): Използван и Bing Streetside
HellMap (2024-08-24 19:20:12+00:00): Čau,

Cik zinu šādi https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1286227212 mierinājumus navigatori un kartes nesapratīs, jo tas nesavienojas ar ceļu. Un kā līnija mierinājumi var būt, ja tas ir kā papildtegs uz paša ceļa (pēc principa kā `tactile_paving` u.c.). Un, cik zinu, kā līnijas tos liek tikai gariem gabaliem kā `traffic_calming=rumble_strip` vai `traffic_calming=island` (kas nav atsevišķi iezīmētas).
somehundred (2024-08-24 20:15:18+00:00): Nezināju. Paldies par info! Tad jāliek kā punkts? Wiki nav nekādi ieteikumi par to kā jāliek... un nav arī minēts, ka navigatori nesapratīs. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:traffic%20calming=hump
HellMap (2024-08-24 20:28:05+00:00): Es personīgi lieku kā punktus, jā. Neesmu (līdz šim) nekad sastapies ar citādiem variantiem. Vienīgais ir tas, ko minēju par tegiem uz ceļa, bet tādu gandrīz nav Latvijā (https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1Qcg) un tas baigais darbs tik sīki likt.

Njā, wiki patukšs. Principā https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:traffic_calming viss info, bet tur tiešām nekas nav īsti labi aprakstīts ar piemēriem, kur tieši kas jāliek. Minēts īsumā gan ir: "Add one of the following tags to a highway way, or a highway node where the device is placed."
Gregory Peony (2024-07-28 04:53:29+00:00): The vast majority of building footprints in this changeset are inaccurate. WAY: 1286229296 & WAY: 1286229294 are quite accurately mapped; please map building footprints to their standard in the future.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151765076
Bendita Moreira (2024-06-13 13:48:06+00:00): hello mr.akuksouski_lyft based to my observation your mapping looks good so keep going it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151765457
eggie (2024-05-24 12:05:36+00:00): Dag Koen   Probeer op de bestaande adresnodes bij te taggen zodat je geen twee adressen krijgt. Wanneer een winkel stopt blijft toch het adres intact?
Wanneer het geen BAG adres is kun je het overigens verwijderen. 
MVG
eggie
Cayenne17 (2024-06-03 20:36:58+00:00): Bonjour,
Il y a plusieurs endroit où vous avez fait des erreurs.
Vous avez changé la ref des routes pour mettre votre adresse mail à la place.

Voici les différentes routes concernées :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/493610250
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/476884142
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/673910094
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/164059649
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/42873862
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/60195962
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/161776618
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/341599122
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/476884162
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/341599123
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/163062903
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/164059638
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/169504616
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/169504617
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/679204174
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/169494690
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/161776604
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/161776605
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/48543832
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/316984091
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/164059640
Alban Dericboug (2024-06-07 12:23:01+00:00): Bonjour,
Ouille ! Mea culpa ! Je ne sais pas comment ça a pu arriver.
Comment puis-je aider à réparer et à comprendre comment j'en suis arrivé à faire ça ?
Cayenne17 (2024-06-07 13:46:38+00:00): Bonjour,

je pense peut-être à un gestionnaire de MDP + remplissage automatique et il aurait confondu le champ identifiant au champ ref et il aurait mis l'email.

Avez-vous en gestionnaire de MDP et si oui, lequel ?

Un retour arrière sur vos changeset et en DWG va masquer les changeset ou infos sur les changeset
gendy54 (2024-06-07 13:53:07+00:00): Le revert a été fait. Le masquage des infos perso va être fait par le DWG.
Alban Dericboug (2024-06-10 07:19:16+00:00): Merci pour le revert !

Et effectivement, j'ai un gestionnaire de mots de passe (LastPass). Je n'en suis pas satisfait... et encore moins après ça !
Je vais voir si je peux le désactiver sur l'éditeur de cartes sans le désactiver sur la mire de login.
Cayenne17 (2024-06-11 17:05:24+00:00): Je viens de vérifier. C'est bon, les versions contenant l'email ont bien été masqués
marczoutendijk (2024-06-11 19:08:12+00:00): The DWG has redacted all instances of that e-mail address still visible in the history of the mentioned highways.
Le DWG  a supprimé toutes les occurrences de cette adresse électronique encore visibles dans l'historique des autoroutes mentionnées.

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
Bendita Moreira (2024-06-13 13:47:25+00:00): hello mr.akuksouski_lyft based to my observation your mapping looks good so keep going it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151765946
MxxCon (2024-05-26 05:40:27+00:00): Hello.
Instead of outright deleting a closed biz node, it's much better to use lifecycle prefix tags as documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
Doing that not only preserves history of this object, if there's ever a need to refer to it later, but it still allows this address to be searchable and routable. Just because a biz closed doesn't mean that address is gone too.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151765955
dannmer (2024-05-26 07:00:31+00:00): As noted in the changeset comment, the address is preserved in another poi (Nute Juice). The closed business was not placed in correct location and the use of lifestyle prefix doesn't seem appropriate here since it would preserve bad data. Doesn't seem to be a good practice to map a closed shop at the wrong location or preserve an address that isn't mapped correctly.
MxxCon (2024-05-26 07:02:51+00:00): You are correct. My apologies here. I saw your 2 similar edits and didn't examine this one as closely as the first one.
Vlachata (2024-05-24 16:07:58+00:00): Wann ercheinen die Fehlerkorrekturen in allen Karten? Wie lange dauert es?
pyram (2024-05-25 16:48:58+00:00): Review:
Danke für die Verbesserung.
Man könnte es noch etwas besser machen: Den Weg als Privatweg und Grundstückszufahrt kennzeichnen
(access=private
highway=service
service=driveway
siehe auch 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dservice ).
Das schützt auch davor, dass der Weg wieder von jemandem vom Luftbild abgemalt wird ;-)

Die eigentliche Frage wurde ja im Forum schon beantwortet:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/fehlerkorrektur-in-de-erscheint-nicht-in-org-warum/113746

Gruß
pyram
osm10005 (2024-05-24 12:58:50+00:00): The name includes the bus number, who stops here, this is written on the sign. Its better to include in the name, that people can see which bus stops here.
VLD528 (2024-06-24 08:58:44+00:00): Ok. I understand this change. You're right.
engsanahz (2024-05-27 17:32:56+00:00): kjk
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-27 05:38:52+00:00): Reverted by https://.org/changeset/151775937
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-27 05:39:07+00:00): Please stop adding test data!!!
yrtimiD (2024-05-29 11:18:46+00:00): Hi, I'd like to ensure that you aligned aerial images to existing gpx tracks
yrtimiD (2024-05-29 20:05:53+00:00): I checked with available gpx, and looks like previous locations was more correct!
citrula (2024-05-24 17:39:55+00:00): Please use the expanded version of the street suffix ("Dr" should be "Drive" instead.) I have fixed this for you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151767229
Airiver (2024-06-17 15:10:26+00:00): Привет, насколько я правильно понял, судя по wiki, камеры должны отмечаться прямо на линии дороги, чтобы их видели навигаторы. 
«Поставьте точку, и пометьте её тегом highway=speed_camera. Точка должна принадлежать линии дороги, на которой находится камера»
Возможно я не прав. Уточните информацию, пожалуйста
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:highway%3Dspeed_camera
LudovicG (2025-04-02 08:11:50+00:00): Bonjour,
J'ai de gros doutes que le way 1246275169 (et proches) soit fee=yes. Quelle est votre source ? Ce n'est pas une erreur en répondant sur StreetComplete ?
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-27 05:41:13+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151879035
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-27 05:41:29+00:00): Please do not add test data!!
Gregory Peony (2024-11-12 20:44:22+00:00): You correctly identified buildings in the imagery. Beware that buildings like those enveloped by WAY: 1286250850 are likely to be two buildings.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151767554
emvee (2024-05-24 20:53:07+00:00): Als dit inderdaad zo is dan moet ook de rest van Westeinde en de Oranjelaan 50 km/h zijn lijkt me.

Volgens NDW staat er wel een A4 "Advies snelheid " bord maar dat taggen we met maxspeed:advisory
emvee (2024-05-25 06:16:31+00:00): Even gespiekt maar er lijken inderdaad A1/A2 borden te staan aan het begin/eind van de bocht.

Dingen nog wat verder verfijnd:

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=151795901
Luzandro (2024-06-20 19:19:06+00:00): s. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146076715
silversurfer83 (2024-05-24 13:32:12+00:00): Hi :)

danke, dass du meine Nachricht gelesen hast und die Änderungen etwas besser kommentierst.

Ich hätte da nochwas: Warum löscht du denn hier einen recht detailliert erfassten Parkplatz um ihn dann mit einem eigenen Parkplatz zu ersetzen bei dem wesentlich weniger Details erfasst sind?

Wenn sich an einem Objekt Details ändern, sollte dies nicht über löschen und neu erzeugen passieren. Dazu gibt es auch von der OSM-Gemeinschaft festgehaltene RIchtlinien die um Beachtung bitten:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history

cheers
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151767931
miluethi (2024-05-25 21:14:58+00:00): Hi Mikko,

Please square out all buildings. 

Just select a shape and press the "Q" key. Easy!

Thank you for contributing to OSM Nicaragua.
mavl (2024-06-22 11:38:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 153025651, 153025658, 153025634, 153025596, 153025615, 153025678 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible sources].
richlv (2024-05-26 18:25:53+00:00): Thank you for the map updates.
According to the official cadastre data, the east-west segment has no name, update accordingly.
felipeeugenio (2024-05-24 16:24:51+00:00): Hola. Buenas ediciones.
Porfa, cuando no haya nada entre un landuse y otro, déjalos pegados.

haces eso en varias ocasiones, pero a veces, por algún motivo, loo dejas separado

Saludos y gracias
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151768397
trichocereus (2024-05-25 15:50:17+00:00): A veces separó campos (farmland u orchard) porque hay caminos que los separan o canales. Si no es problema dejar esos caminos y canales dentro de un landuse, los dejaré juntos.
felipeeugenio (2024-05-25 16:00:19+00:00): Hola.
No, si hay caminos y canales, entonces se paran, si no; dejarlos juntos.
Te hacía el comentario porque a veces no veo nada que haya entremedio y están separados.

Pero si hay algo, está ok.
Bendita Moreira (2024-06-13 13:46:40+00:00): hello akuksouski_lyft based to my observation your mapping looks good so keep going it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151768679
noelbov (2024-05-24 13:58:14+00:00): Due to your update, cycleroute 27-66 was interrupted. Please be careful, pay attention and  don't damage other peoples work.
Ardennen8 (2024-05-24 16:13:12+00:00): I have removed them because i was not allowed to cut the road but i have replaced and fixed them like before.
Hugoren Martinako (2024-05-28 08:32:36+00:00): Hi there,

We're noticed you're adding the role admin_centro to some administrative regions:
- Castilla y León (this changeset)
- Castilla-La Mancha (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151927389)
- Euskadi (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151927015)

Those roles were removed on purpose. Such regions lack of any capital.

In case you need a node to identify/determine the regions, you may use the label role instead.

Regards