piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
uppermethow (2023-02-07 23:31:22+00:00): Thanks for your edits, huntnb! The `layer` key is how you specify whether objects are above or below each other. When two objects intersect, their `layer` values are compared to determine whether one is above or below the other. Here the 436th Ave SE bridge way has layer=1. Generally objects without `layer` have a `layer` value of 0, so the bridge goes over the path in OSM Carto.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131711768
NorthCrab (2023-01-26 05:36:49+00:00): Witaj na OpenStreetMap!
Proszę nie usuwaj znaczników istniejących miejscowości. Jeśli jest on umieszczony w złym miejscu to popraw jego lokalizację zamiast usuwać go kompletnie z mapy.
Przywróciłem tą edycję,
Pozdrawiam!
MKnight (2023-08-07 18:56:09+00:00): Moin, was muss man sich unter "Sa,Su,PH off,13:00-16:00" vorstellen?
müllers (2023-08-07 19:13:14+00:00): Fehler abgestellt ---> Danke für den Hinweis
user_6110846 (2023-05-04 09:06:42+00:00): зараз росіяни вбивають українців 
згадай Бучанську різанину

я про тещо нафіга добавлять російський переклад 

російська мова це мова вбивць та гвалтівників 
і взагалі російська мова це гівно це какашка це моча це мерзость 
від неї треба очищати Україну а не  забруднювати цим гівном
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-02-06 12:39:38+00:00): Please don't vandalize the roads by changing them to paths.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Vandalism
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-02-06 12:42:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted
sheldonelectric (2023-01-26 09:40:03+00:00): when i'm in that case, I also add a "fixme" to check if the place is still open
Kristjan ESPERANTO (2023-01-26 16:59:12+00:00): Thanks for the hint. I added a fixme.
LockOnGuy (2023-01-26 18:39:49+00:00): Hello, the Facebook page is working for me now when I checked.     
Maybe it only show for people in Iraq? like region lock? or maybe you are not signed in to Facebook?
Anyway, here is the screenshot for the page: https://i.ibb.co/XWD256N/image.png     
If you removed other Facebook contact links maybe you need to double check.          
Regards.
LockOnGuy (2023-01-26 19:09:16+00:00): Yup, region locked. Facebook has pages that are region locked to specific countries.      
https://i.ibb.co/y800nYQ/image.png
It's also mentioned in the Facebook help:   
https://www.facebook.com/help/778445532225441      
"Country restrictions: You can choose to show or hide your Page only to people in some countries."
Kristjan ESPERANTO (2023-01-26 22:09:24+00:00): Wow! Many thanks for the hint! This makes it a lot harder to validate URLs.

I've added the page back.
LockOnGuy (2023-01-26 22:19:27+00:00): Thank you for putting it back.    
If you have a OSM wiki account I would suggest to add a note in:    
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:contact:facebook    
Saying that some pages won't show cause it's region locked etc.. and put this link as a source:     
https://www.facebook.com/help/778445532225441       
Thanks.
Kristjan ESPERANTO (2023-01-26 22:39:49+00:00): Your wish is my command ;-)

What do you think of my wording: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:contact:facebook#Country_restrictions
LockOnGuy (2023-01-26 22:43:38+00:00): Beautiful! Perfect, clear and straight to the point! Thank you and keep up the good work!
Kristjan ESPERANTO (2023-01-26 23:02:21+00:00): Thank you for the valuable and constructive feedback!
Fischkopp0815 (2023-01-26 11:24:58+00:00): Ist diese Note damit erledigt?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3384347
user4816003805 (2023-01-26 03:09:01+00:00): Hi Kristjan,

Out of curiosity, is there a reason to prefer that format for the phone key? The wiki suggests that hyphens and spaces are not significant:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone

In terms of the website, I often use "disused:website" to mark a website as broken and to prevent it from being re-added. Unfortunately, a lot of restaurants still have signs for their restaurants even long after their domains have expired. It's also possible that a website could be fixed later on. When surveying on the ground, I usually add signed websites, but I don't always check the history of a node to see if it was previously removed.

What do you think?

Happy mapping!
Kristjan ESPERANTO (2023-01-26 17:16:21+00:00): Hi User :-)

Thanks for the tip with "disused:website" I'm considering whether I'll take it over. Although I actually like the approach: "Unnecessary outdated data does not belong in OSM" (my free interpretation of [1]).

Regarding telephone numbers: Hyphens are usually used in the number range +1. This also corresponds to the international format that the parser from Google [2] outputs. This parser is the reference that is referred to in almost all programming languages when it comes to formatting phone numbers.

I am value-free whether spaces or hyphens are used. I just like standards because data formatted according to a standard is easier to validate.

Have fun mapping too! :-)

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
[2] https://htmlpreview.github.io/?https://github.com/google/libphonenumber/blob/master/javascript/i18n/phonenumbers/demo-compiled.html
tvajha (2023-01-25 22:25:07+00:00): Here's the related news article:
https://www.recorder.com/MassDOT-to-expedite-full-replacement-of-General-Pierce-Bridge-46803196
adrianojbr (2023-01-26 14:18:51+00:00): Olá, Lucas!

Reservas ecológicas não são leisure=park (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark).

Para mapear corretamente favor observar essa página: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brazil/Unidades_de_conserva%C3%A7%C3%A3o

Outra coisa, em regra, sigla e abreviaturas não vão em name, mas sim em short_name. Exceção quando a sigla é notória, por exemplo, Celesc, aí o nome completo pode ir em alt_name ou official_name.

Abraço!
MxxCon (2023-01-27 02:55:48+00:00): Hello.
Probably worth adding location=roof to this?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131713405
VLD186 (2023-01-27 15:16:38+00:00): I appreciate your feedback. I have added the location=roof tag, as suggested.
SK53 (2023-01-26 03:00:41+00:00): Just looked at this because of: https://twitter.com/EmilyKerr36/status/1618271589602332672. Wondered if foot=permissive & bicycle=permissive would be more appropriate access tags.  (It is a couple of ages since I last wandered through here, often for some bizarre reason on a Maundy Thursday when getting into buildings wasn't easy).

Jerry
gmar5 (2023-01-26 18:15:33+00:00): Yes, that makes sense. Done. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131742909
MV2XGKZTSD (2023-01-25 23:17:31+00:00): Sure! I'll fix it.
Jacob Zelek (2023-01-26 09:07:49+00:00): No apologies. I forgot to mention to though that this road doesn't exist anymore either. I was just out there and it couldn't be found. It's all sand out there and there was just monsoon rains recently.
Jacob Zelek (2023-01-26 09:34:30+00:00): Sorry ment to say my apologies.
MV2XGKZTSD (2023-01-25 23:17:04+00:00): Sure! I'll fix it.
MV2XGKZTSD (2023-01-25 23:16:53+00:00): Thanks
Frans S (2023-01-27 17:43:01+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
A question. You retagged a trace (vague visible) from path into unclassified. Since it is so narrow that the original tag "path" suits best.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa

How to measure the width of a road.
See this webpage. it is mentioned under the tab Miscellaneous

Best regards
emersonveenstra (2023-01-26 11:59:25+00:00): Overall this looks good! The one thing I noticed is that you need to trace houses better, the areas in OSM need to be the same shape as the house, not just rectangles. Also I'm not sure this is correct https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1135305074, tourism=apartments means like a vacation house, i think you meant to put building=apartments because it's an apartment building?
wkdgs (2023-01-31 11:05:13+00:00): Wenn es ein privater Mülleimer ist, kannst du ihn  auch löschen. Oder hat es irgendeinen Mehrwert, dass er in OSM eingetragen ist?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131714479
mfbehrens (2023-01-31 19:43:08+00:00): Es handelt sich um einen Müllplatz von einem Studentenwohnheim mit ~100 Bewohnern. Wir generieren auch Karten von unserem Wohnheim auf OSM Basis wodurch es durchaus einen Mehrwert hat
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2023-01-30 17:17:02+00:00): نرجوا منكم عدم رفع تعديلاتكم التجريبية فهذه الخريطة يستخدمها ويستفيد منها الكثير من الناس
SomeoneElse (2023-01-27 14:53:34+00:00): Hello,
This looks very much like a mechanical edit.  I haven't seen any discussion with the local community.  If you you did that, can you explain where?  If not, it may need to be reverted.
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2023-01-27 14:56:10+00:00): Alas, it seems that you have ignored the problems that you caused previously:
http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=12163682
SherbetS (2023-01-27 14:58:05+00:00): Hi Andy,

I had not had a discussion before I made this change. I’ll be happy to have discussion before editing again if revert is needed.

-SherbetS
nyampire (2023-01-26 07:08:40+00:00): OSMへようこそ、編集をレビューしました。

とても良く描けていると思います！
同じ名前のビルが2つなのは、2棟ある、ということでしょうか。
もしそうなら、refタグを使って1と2を区別するなどの方法があります。
状況がどうなっているか調査したりして、OSM編集をしてみてもらえると嬉しいです。

Happy Mapping！
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131715353
EvanSiroky (2023-02-08 23:03:33+00:00): Hey there! I'm a local mapper from Scotts Valley, CA. I see that you requested a review of this changeset, so I'm giving it a review.

You are right that this cycle path crossing does look a bit funky. In the satellite imagery, there is clearly a cycleway crossing.

A great way to go about editing the map would be to add the proper crosswalks at this intersection. Usually, the crosswalks could be marked as explained in the OSM wiki article about crossings (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing). In this case, I'd specifically mark the crossing of Doolittle drive as a Cycleway Crossing (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cycleway%3Dcrossing). There are a few presets in the iD editor of OpenStreetMap that should allow you to find these kinds of tags.

If you're not familiar with adding ways, I'd recommend going through the iD editor tutorial. If you need to get to the tutorial, you can begin editing on this website, then open up the help tab and click the "Start the Walkthrough" button.
jumbanho (2023-01-26 14:52:19+00:00): Welcome to OSM and thanks for mapping.  This looks great!
DressyPear4 (2023-01-27 10:12:49+00:00): Olá, discuta com a comunidade antes de alterar a classificação de vias
https://t.me/osm_classificacao_vias
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brazil/Classifica%C3%A7%C3%A3o_de_vias
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131715801
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2023-01-30 20:28:24+00:00): نرجوا منكم عدم تعديل تصنيف المكان لما يعاكس الواقع الفعلي
ChrissW-R1 (2025-01-18 11:29:51+00:00): Please check https://osm.org/note/4582201
mweper (2023-01-26 14:24:39+00:00): Hola xrosarinox. Estoy viendo que se añaden PDI como edificios pero no existen tal cual. Por favor, revisa al añadir un PDI porque iD incluye la etiqueta "building" junto con algunas categoría de elementos.
Ya he corregido algunos. Saludos.
gscholz (2023-01-27 07:07:39+00:00): Hi danctc,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-56.32723&lat=-15.22141&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=131716244

Obviously the boundary relation of "Acorizal" is broken now.

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
spiregrain (2023-02-05 21:35:27+00:00): Hi there.  Have you visited Wanstead Flats or looked at the satellite images or GPS traces?  I do not beleive this path exists on the ground, and I'm sure the bridge you added does not.   What is your source?
Frans S (2023-01-27 17:06:53+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
A remark about tagging of highways as track.
As you can read on this wiki page
a track is only to be used between settlements and farmland, woods and waterways as a local destination
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa

Best regards
Frans S (2023-01-26 16:29:02+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
A remark. You ignored the warnings the Issue triangle showed to you
They ought to be solved before you upload your work.
Issues: connected node of road to a building. This is an error en need to be corrected.
13 warnings, disconnected highways. Here, it is difficult to recognize a trace which could be a path or road. No comment on that
You tagged a trace with a width of less than 1.5 mtr as an unclassified highway.  Path should be a better tag.
You can measure a trace. 
see this page
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ID/Shortcuts

Best regards and keep mapping
Enderbyte99 (2023-01-27 04:27:05+00:00): Sorry. This is my first time trying this out. In the future I shall not do this.

Thank you
PLima785 (2023-01-27 00:23:48+00:00): Obrigado
Udarian (2023-01-27 01:15:27+00:00): I may have messed something up here I just cant tell what it is because all I did was update the geometry of the coast line and cut a hedge short but in the tiles the water does not update to fill the whole of the area that it should.
Allison P (2023-01-27 04:17:20+00:00): Coastlines are rerendered very infrequently due to their unique implementation that is also computationally intensive. If you did things right it can still take weeks to show up.
Udarian (2023-01-27 21:27:58+00:00): ok, thank you for the information, I thought that there might be some relation or something like that that I did not update not knowing about it since I haven't really done anything like this before. 
all I did was update the geometry of the coast like in iD an I assumed that is all I needed to do.
❤️‍🔥 (2023-01-26 06:25:14+00:00): Hi, there's nothing wrong with platforms and footpaths overlapping - this is actually quite important, because some navigation software will only direct people along roads and paths, not platforms (nor along piers/jettys). 

Here's an example of this at Manurewa Station, where the more logical route would be to walk along the platform: https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_valhalla_foot&route=-37.02371%2C174.89689%3B-37.02309%2C174.89602#map=19/-37.02336/174.89604
Warin61 (2023-01-26 03:42:24+00:00): Doh!
Detailing Big Hill Rural Fire Brigade!
watmildon (2025-02-19 05:29:27+00:00): Hello! Lots of detail!

I just added mascot= info so that it will render on the mascot map. Feel free to add others if you run across any.

https://github.com/watmildon/HighSchoolMascotMap
emersonveenstra (2023-01-26 11:51:35+00:00): Hi! Couple of things, you added ford=yes to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/919931705#map=16/42.8759/-85.7528, which i think is a mistake, and also, just because a sidewalk is asphalt and wider than normal doesn't always mean it's a cycleway. Cycleways have to be designated primarily for bicycles (via sign or law), which I don't believe this is (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=cycleway for more info)
Carlos Brys (2023-01-26 11:46:44+00:00): Hice unos ajustes en los nombres.
En OSM no se escriben todo en mayúsculas.
Los nombres de los barrios no llevan la denominación "Barrio"
mavl (2023-04-25 09:04:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:10:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:06:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mangerlahn (2023-01-28 22:49:05+00:00): Vielen Dank für deine Änderung! Soweit ich weiß ist das an der Stelle der Zweinaundorfer Straße kein Radweg, sondern ein für Radfahrende freigegebener Fußweg. 
Genauer wäre das (laut Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen_kartieren) Zeichen (239 + 1022-10)

Oder hat sich da in den letzten Wochen was geändert?

Viele Grüße
Max
august-lej (2023-01-30 10:35:46+00:00): Lieber Max, es hat sich dort nichts geändert. Leider sehe ich in Street-Complete nur grobe Arten des Radweges. Das korrekte Verkehrszeichen und damit den in diesem Fall wirklich zutreffenden Radweg konnte ich gar nicht auswählen. Korrigiere mich also bitte, falls der Edit falsch war.
Danke Dir!

Viele Grüße
August
Glassman (2023-01-26 16:59:16+00:00): #TIP: In OSM a path is what we in the US call a trail. A paved path should be called a footway. Because OSM was founded in England, we use British English terms for tags which can be confusing. Can you review your edit and update the paths to footways if that seem correct? Thanks I'll send more info on OSM in a message
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131717940
Dimacn (2023-01-26 06:46:20+00:00): Пожалуйста не добавляйте новые дороги поверх уже существующих, вы же их дублируете. Нужно просто редактировать те что есть, например, добавить название улицы. 2. На этой дороге действительно стоят знаки ограничения скорости 40?
mavl (2023-04-25 09:07:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:00:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:02:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
Dimacn (2023-01-26 15:44:18+00:00): Пожалуйста не добавляйте новые дороги поверх уже существующих, вы же их дублируете. Нужно просто редактировать те что есть, например, добавить название улицы.
mavl (2023-04-25 08:59:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
user_5359 (2023-01-26 07:48:56+00:00): Welcome To OSM! Don‘t delete existing ways! You can add the tag access=private, if there is no public access.
mavl (2023-04-25 09:03:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:11:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
StevenWalkerOSM (2023-01-26 08:10:17+00:00): Noted, will tag access as private
streckenkundler (2023-01-26 07:58:19+00:00): Hei,
eine ganz große Bitte: nutze mit iD mindestens die ESRI-Luftbilder und nicht Bing. Bing hat oft einen üblen Lageversatz, ist veraltet und in der Qualität schlecht. ESRI entpricht den LGB-Luftbildern.

Danke, Sven
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-02-03 06:44:18+00:00): Why you added surface=ground as surface value of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/490378286/history ?
mavl (2023-02-27 07:27:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133071607 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132159284].
mavl (2023-02-27 07:27:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133071607 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132159284].
Gonéo (2023-01-27 18:36:59+00:00): Bonjour et merci pour votre contribution. Vous avez demandé une relecture. Je ne vois rien de particulier à redire si le chemin existe. Je ne vois aucune trace sur Strava ni sur le cadastre, mais s'il existe sur le terrain (trace GXP?) alors tant mieux.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131722093
mavl (2023-02-27 07:27:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133071607 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132159284].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:08:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
Gonéo (2023-01-27 18:30:48+00:00): Bonjour et merci pour votre contribution. Attention, le chemin croise le ruisseau. Il serait bien de préciser si il s'agit d'un pont, d'un gué ou autre connexion.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131722328
Gonéo (2023-01-27 18:28:04+00:00): Bonjour et merci pour votre contribution. Vous avez demandé une relecture. Je ne vois rien à redire sur cet ajout de nom. Bonne continuation
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131722417
mavl (2023-02-27 07:27:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133071607 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132159284].
archie (2023-01-26 08:43:41+00:00): Grattis! denna gång utan väg ovanpå väg.
aleno150 (2023-01-26 09:00:55+00:00): Tack. Och gällande Norrköping är det fixat eller skriv vad det som är fel på min changeset kopplat till vägen?
archie (2023-01-26 09:15:54+00:00): Gör en körning med validatorn där du editerade.