piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
romanh (2026-04-05 20:56:25+00:00): Hallo Mjulius, Ich habe vor 11 Monate den Knoten 1607635728 Hochspannungsmasten versetzt , da er wegen dem Bau der A1 auf 6 Spuren versetzt wurde. Du hast diesen vor 5 Monate basierend auf veralteten Luftaufnahmen der Swisstopo wieder zurück versetzt. Der Masten ist jetzt dort wo die Autobahn 6 spurig durchfährt. Schade.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1607635728/history/7
Gruss Roman
Dodko (2025-11-15 21:22:36+00:00): Niektoré adresy som doplnil a niektoré krivé domy vyrovnal
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=174703429
Yakari (kleiner Indianer) (2025-11-14 19:31:30+00:00): Is great to see someone who is interested to residential areas. I planned to map these areas too. I don't know what is more fast: Mapping residential areas separately on city blocks or mapping areas together with separating on roads 1., 2., and 3. class. I use second option.
morsiu (2025-11-16 20:28:21+00:00): Thanks for the encouraging words. I can say from experience that the second option is definitely faster, though I like the accuracy of the first one so I stick to that for now.
TrickyFoxy (2025-12-06 02:05:55+00:00): 👋 В название объектов не нужно добавлять тип объекта. В случае магазинов слово «магазин» дописывать не нужно
TrickyFoxy (2025-12-06 02:06:28+00:00): Также не сокращайте названия улиц. Принято писать их полностью
infeeeee (2025-11-14 12:48:50+00:00): Szia!

Olyan dolgokat amiknek már nyoma sincs a helyszínen nem térképezünk. Megszűnt vasútból is a  csak az szerepel OSM-en, ahol még a környezetéből következtetni lehet, hogy valaha ott volt. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Drazed

Ha régi dolgokat szeretnél térképezni, arra ott van az OpenHistoricalMap: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenHistoricalMap

Forrásnak a FÖMI 2007-2010-et írtad be, azon nem is látszik ez a híd.

Mapillary-n sok idei fotó látható a helyszínről, ezeken látszik, hogy nem maradt nyoma ennek a hídnak és a rávezető töltéseknek: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=634432019580070

Szóval szerintem ez nem való osm-re, ezt és a másik kapcsolódó szerkesztésedet visszavonnám.

További jó térképezést!
StC (2025-11-14 15:36:07+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changeset a brisé la continuité de deux itinéraires pédestres qui passent par là. Je m'occupe de la réparation.
Robbert van Dijk (2025-11-14 22:57:02+00:00): Bonjour StC, peut-être j'ai fait une erreur. Avez-vous déja fait des réparations? Ça semble bon quand je vois maintenant.
StC (2025-11-15 08:58:40+00:00): Oui, c'était facile à faire.
user_5359 (2025-11-14 07:51:17+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the nodes https://www.osm.org/node/3851865157 (restaurant), https://www.osm.org/node/12727010719 (bicycle parking) more than 100 meters. Please check the correct position. If you need help, you are welcome!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-12-09 20:42:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 175731398 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes prior to redaction
keyyushi (2025-11-14 20:05:08+00:00): Belirtilen yerler zaten mevcut.

Beytepe: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1482037434

Yapracık: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1482070321

Değişikliği geri aldım: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174663635
Frans S (2025-12-01 13:56:50+00:00): On this task, the high-rise buildings are often incorrectly mapped.
You can see both one or more side walls and the roof. The imagery is taken under a certain angle, so you can see more .
Often all visible walls and roofs are mapped as 1 building.
The correct way is to map the roofline and move the whole object on their footprint.

See this video.
For buildings with a few floors, start watching from 1 minute. 
https://youtu.be/Tpi-BTMVo1M
https://youtu.be/dsfUcslLtVc?si=bEHwRl1sxDI_GA0H

Best regards
dmjab13 (2025-11-14 14:31:42+00:00): why would you do this in one changeset
felipeeugenio (2025-11-14 11:05:08+00:00): Hola

Todo eso es el condominio San Anselmo?
O es un barrio con varios condominios?

Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174626863
tmr21 (2025-11-14 21:48:42+00:00): No se a que te refieres, pero puede ser un error de pinchado.
FrookMartineli (2025-12-14 00:48:38+00:00): Currently open to construction only
felipeeugenio (2025-11-14 11:07:23+00:00): Hola. ojo que los condoimnios no son barrios. Se mapean de otra manera. Yo lo arreglo.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174627165
Sylabowy Kot (2025-11-14 07:09:43+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1383524453/history/2

Skąd masz informację, że teren nie zamienia się w Ośrodek dla imigrantów, że przywróciłeś poprzednią nazwę? Ten brownfield wymaga podziału, gdyż od północy powstaje dom jednorodzinny, a reszta terenu jest jakoś wykorzystywana przez straż graniczną, policję (co sugerowało by obsługę imigrantów) - wyczytałem na miejscu w ostatnich tygodniach.
Sylabowy Kot (2025-11-14 07:17:53+00:00): Może nie tyle obsługę imigrantów, co moje spostrzeżenie potwierdza medialną informację o przekazaniu terenu Urzędowi do Spraw Cudzoziemców - zarówno on, jak i Straż Graniczna, są podległe MSWiA.
https://infoserock.pl/2025/04/22/centrum-w-jachrance-dezinformacja-i-pytania-ktore-wciaz-czekaja-na-odpowiedz/
syntex (2025-11-15 14:10:46+00:00): Nie widziałem żadnego materiału który by faktycznie potwierdził iż coś się tam dzieje - głównie materiały iż jest to kontrowersyjne miejsce. Nadal jest ono bardziej kojarzone z ośrodkiem GUS niż ośrodkiem dla migrantów o czym świadczy np. nazwa przystanku autobusowego
Sylabowy Kot (2025-11-18 09:49:53+00:00): Niestety podczas poruszania się tam nie zwróciłem uwagi, czy nazwa przystanku mogła ulec zmianie. Nie zwróciłem też uwagi na więcej błędów w zmianie tego obiektu w ośrodek dla imigrantów. Tak czy siak, w takim biegu wydarzeń jestem w stanie uznać za poprawne twój sposób dokonania zmiany. Na podstawie swojej wspomnianej wizji lokalnej wprowadzę poprawniejsze zagospodarowanie.
b-jazz (2025-11-14 18:41:58+00:00): Thanks for your contributions Mark.

In the future, please make sure the greens and fairways don't intersect each other. I realize you were just adding greens and the fairways were already poorly drawn in, but it sets off Q/A checks when they overlap. Thanks.
Mark09 (2026-05-31 13:03:29+00:00): This is a late response, but thanks for the advice.  I don't map golf courses often.  I have since looked up best practices for mapping golf courses on the OSM Wiki and will strive to do better.  Thanks for improving upon my edits and fixing any issues I created.
JuanElDemografo (2025-11-14 00:47:55+00:00): I wouldn't apply the extra "name=*" tag to the yard unless it's officially named as such. I would also consider expanding the "landuse=commercial" to the entire lot since it looks like they're storing other cars and trailers outside the yard.

Additionally, rather than "office=towing" I would probably use "service:vehicle:towing=yes" with "shop=car_repair".
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174627260
Clairness (2025-11-14 01:09:52+00:00): Gotcha, will update within the next hour or so. Thank you for the feedback on it! I spent a while looking at different tags and other info on forums etc, and there's not much information (some of it conflicting) on marking towing services/tow yards.
As of right now and for the past couple of months/past year when I've went by there occasionally, I haven't noticed vehicles outside of the fenced in yard, but perhaps it is better to just mark the whole lot.
user_5359 (2025-11-14 08:00:05+00:00): Welcome to OSM!

Short hint for the value of the key service_times. Is the service held every day or only on Sundays? In the latter case, you forgot the day abbreviation Su.
By the way, we write the time in 24-hour notation and do not abbreviate minutes.
Matthew Strange (2025-11-14 15:25:21+00:00): Thanks for the info! I was also thinking about putting in the office hours. Now I'll have to go about figuring out how to do that!
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-09 09:27:02+00:00): Hello!

You used
motor_vehicle=now
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13302717406/history

Have you maybe meant
motor_vehicle=no
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
gurglypipe (2025-12-10 13:44:18+00:00): You’re right, it’s a typo. Thanks for spotting it and letting me know! Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175760386 :)
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-10 17:28:44+00:00): thanks!
Mashin (2025-11-14 11:50:33+00:00): Hi David,
what is the reason behind this change?
New osmc:symbol does not follow to correct syntax. 
Expected is color:backround_symbol:foreground_1:foreground_2

And also "white_round:green_triangle" does not describe "White tree in green circle".
David Reik (2025-11-14 13:04:45+00:00): What does the blaze actually look like?  I think we'll only be able to do an approximation on osm.  Wouldn't it be great if we could do custom blazes on osm?  I am going out to Sleeping Giant today, I hope.  I'll see if I can take a picture of a Nature Trail blaze.  I think the tree is green, not white, but I'll check it out.
Mashin (2025-11-14 16:08:48+00:00): Could be that I mixed up the colors, but according to picture in here, it should be correct:
https://www.globalsistersreport.org/spirituality/warning-gps-might-make-you-lose-your-way

I see what you are going for now, but we should be careful. Osmc:symbol should represent the real life blaze and not leave people guessing.

Also I am wondering what is the purpose  of replacing e.g. blue_red:blue_stripe:red_lower with blue-red:blue_stripe:red_lower. The underscore was used to keep the value separator consistent. Does it cause troubles anywhere?
David Reik (2025-11-15 12:10:55+00:00): I got back to Sleeping Giant yesterday.  I was wrong - the trees are white.  It seems that part of the Nature Trail was discontinued, although the discontinued section still has some blazes.  You can see a bunch of my pictures of the blazes at https://photos.app.goo.gl/mhVc1hkw74GGw47W9 .  I thought the characters in the first field in the osmc:symbol were just a label for the tagger's convenience.  Have you gotten involved with Hiking.WaymarkedTrails.org?  I noticed the "stripe" option for the background recently became available.
Mashin (2025-11-17 18:03:50+00:00): I submitted an issue long time ago, and it seems this came out as a response. 
It would be good to come to a agreement if to use it as a symbol (though it will probably not work on other maps using osmc:symbol). And how to tag two-color routes.
Bill Muchmore (2025-11-14 16:45:31+00:00): Should have put this in the source: https://www.portland.gov/transportation/pbot-projects/construction/south-portland-addressing-project
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-11-14 11:27:01+00:00): Hi! Thanks for adding the hgv tag. However, why remove sidewalk:left=separate? The sidewalk is indeed drawn separately on the left.
akotys (2025-11-14 11:33:23+00:00): Hi. By mistake
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-11-14 13:00:40+00:00): No problem, have a nice day!
TriangleMaple (2025-11-14 01:21:05+00:00): Mainly focused on Maywood Elementary School, the large changeset box since I added a way with merged nodes to BC Parkway (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1450417898)
Clairness (2025-11-14 01:29:58+00:00): I would like to add that I did not change the shop tag to car_service, as despite the official name of the business on their sign, they do not offer vehicle repairs at this location, only recoveries and towing, as well as vehicle storage for impounds.
Comino (2025-11-14 09:02:49+00:00): Comment left on location: Paid for wine via bitcoin lightning in store Sep 13, 2024 

or the year 2025?

Your Bitcoin tags are incomplete and I fixed the date tag value that was not properly formatted.

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
https://btcmap.org/tagger/6794624
Yushclay (2025-11-14 01:53:08+00:00): Clarification: Ted Williams Parkway trunk tagging should not proceed east of Pomerado Rd where Twin Peaks Plaza and Discovery Isle Preschool access is not controlled.
Besides that, Ted Williams Parkway was a former right of way proposed to be an extension of CA-56 motorway, and was planned with that possibility in the region's road network.
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-12-10 03:07:27+00:00): All that describes the road's physical characteristics, which can be tagged with expressway=yes and access_control=*. The way that it is classified right now means that Ted Williams Pkwy doesn't connect to any other trunk road or motorway/freeway, hence why I downgraded it to primary east of the I-15.
Yushclay (2025-12-10 04:47:00+00:00): Yep, let's do that then. Hope your proposal makes it through.
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-12-10 19:46:38+00:00): Thanks! 👍
i2004 (2025-11-14 02:10:12+00:00): queres que te ayude con las del 115?
nevw (2025-11-14 04:32:53+00:00): Hi, you have added two defibrillators to this location. Are there two or did you accidentally add a duplicate?
nevw (2025-11-26 06:05:36+00:00): Duplicate has been removed
aceman444 (2026-05-05 18:38:09+00:00): Zdravim, podla coho ste napr. na budove https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/61741059 zmenili addr:place na Kremnicka? V registri adries je dodnes Radvan. A podla coho ste zmenili addr:source na "minvskaddress 2025-11" ? Ak pouzivate Dodkovu aplikaciu na register adries, tak tam novsie data ako 2025-01 nie su. A ak pouzivate oficialny register adries, tak tam zase nie je addr:place=Kremnicka (cize ani po manualnom kuknuti do registra v mesiaci 2025-11 tato zmena z neho nevyplynula). Taketo zmeny ste urobili aj na dalsich budovach (napr. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/66061015 ), preto ma zaujima podla akeho zdroja postupujete. Ponechavate znacky ako by to bol register adries, ale asi nie je.
slovak_scouser (2026-05-06 19:23:35+00:00): Zmeny som robil vyložene len na základe dát z katastra, mám napísané vlastné skripty. Čo sa týka addr:source, zvažoval som či pri zmene použiť dátum, kedy boli dáta aktualizované v katastri alebo ten, kedy som spravil zmenu v osm. Nakoniec som sa rozhodol pre druhú možnosť, nakoľko mi prišla vhodnejšia. A ohľadom addr:place bol som v tom, že pri adresách, ktoré majú len súpisné číslo, by addr:place malo byť zhodné s názvom k.ú., v ktorom sa daný adresný bod nachádza. Ak to tak nemá byť, môžem to kľudne opraviť.
FS Patagonia (2025-11-19 04:29:51+00:00): Hola Guille! El cambio fue únicamente en el tramo que atraviesa el municipio de Neuquén (hace por lo menos dos años, en estos días se formalizó el traspaso). En Cipolletti y Plottier, sigue siendo "Ruta Nacional A022", como estaba mapeado antes.
user_23503962 (2025-11-14 03:07:02+00:00): *we don't want a big brother. 
although my brother lives in the area I'm the one doing this even though I don't live near Dallas
QuiLe (2025-11-17 21:53:40+00:00): This changeset was reverted because it used an incompatible source or relied on local knowledge when the user stated they were not from the area. Please see osm.org/copyright for more information.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174793513
user_23503962 (2025-11-14 03:07:43+00:00): i messed up on this plz delete sorry
QuiLe (2025-11-17 05:09:05+00:00): Changeset reverted
NeisBot (2025-11-14 03:04:01+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "성형외과EmptyEntriesI made a mistake 
 성형外科クリニックBecome 
Plastic surgery clinic"
NeisBot (2025-11-14 03:04:01+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-11-18 14:03:50+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/174630343
QuiLe (2025-11-17 21:50:51+00:00): This changeset was reverted because it used an incompatible source or relied on local knowledge when the user stated they were not from the area. Please see osm.org/copyright for more information.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174793406
QuiLe (2025-11-17 05:06:27+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please note, that using Google Imagery is not permitted. Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright for more information.
eggie (2025-11-14 07:17:17+00:00): Welkom bij OSM. Alleen een naam doet niets in OSM. Ook de aard van het bedrif toevoegen
Bv.
shop=car_repair
shop=car_parts

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=car
MVG
eggie
Supreme Tuning (2025-11-15 02:23:33+00:00): shop=car_tuning
shop=car_maintenance
shop=car_parts
service=car_tuning
service=car_maintenance
building=6A
building=6B
phone=+31619828216
name=Supreme Tuning
brand=bmw;mini;volkswagen;audi;seat;cupra;mercedes
name=Supreme Werks
website=https://supremetuning.nl
mweper (2025-11-14 10:34:29+00:00): Hi. I see you used Mapillary's photos as a guide for editing here. However, those photos are outdated because those road blocks no longer exist; the Galindo roundabout has been opened.
This needs to be reversed.
mweper (2025-11-15 12:20:21+00:00): This change has already been reversed for the reason mentioned above. I pass by there every day for work and can confirm this. I even plan to return to that neighborhood soon with Mapillary to update it. Best regards.

See: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174684495
GivorsCanal (2025-11-18 03:43:37+00:00): Hello mweper. Thanks for letting me know about the change made. And yes! Adding new Mapillary for the area would be a huge benefit! Thank you for doing that and updating the map. Have a good day, GivorsCanal.
mweper (2025-11-20 20:44:08+00:00): Updated! 
https://mapillary.com/map/im/1336884174580448
GivorsCanal (2025-11-21 18:18:36+00:00): Thank you!
HashFerret (2025-11-14 04:16:54+00:00): Thanks for fixing this. Sometimes it's hard to catch the few random buildings that had differently formatted addresses before.
MxxCon (2025-11-15 19:06:38+00:00): Changeset reverted due to dragged node.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174700535
Warin61 (2025-11-15 04:08:46+00:00): Hi,
The warning you got on uploading this is real and would have been best fixed before upload. The multipolygon relation does not have a closed outer.

In fact this does not need to be a relation at all... a simple closed way would do the job. I would suggest you delete it and remap it as a closed way.
JuanElDemografo (2025-11-14 16:50:24+00:00): One extra thing is that road crossings should be split from the neighboring sidewalks and tagged as footway=crossing.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174631749
evgenykatyshev (2025-11-14 08:13:28+00:00): Добрый день!

Спасибо, что добавляете отсутствующие на карет участки дорог. Но хотел бы ещё раз попросить вас использовать для уточнения карты спутниковвую подложку Esri вместо Bing (можно переключить в правой панели редактора).
NeisBot (2025-11-14 04:48:41+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Cornell Forge Co metal forging factory in Chicago"
NeisBot (2025-11-14 04:48:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description
NeisReview (2025-11-18 14:02:55+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/174635867
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-11-14 12:54:55+00:00): Hi! THanks for adding parking restrictions!

However, amenity=parking is only for surface areas or nodes, not the highway itself. Thanks!
NeisBot (2025-11-14 05:45:40+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description
NeisBot (2025-11-14 05:45:41+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Law office"
user_5359 (2025-11-14 07:30:11+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database.
Please only draw in existing objects and facts. I have now reverted your changes.
You are not a church!
pitscheplatsch (2025-11-18 14:02:30+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174635782
smallCat (2025-11-15 02:35:11+00:00): Hello lidabashiTK, in Chinese mainland, we use simplified Chinese. So please use simplified Chinese in name tag, and you can add traditional Chinese name in name:zh-Hant
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-11-14 12:51:05+00:00): Hi! Thanks for the update.

However, please add access=private to swimming pools which belongs to private homes, otherwise they may be counted as publicly accessible. I fix these already. Thanks and have a nice day!
NorthCrab_upload (2025-11-14 07:33:23+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13299983061

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
literan (2025-11-15 11:28:12+00:00): если что, отношение building никем не поддерживается, кроме Органика, вроде бы. На рендер на заглавной странице OSM не влияет
Baloo Uriza (2025-11-14 16:51:40+00:00): I re-added the hamlet node for White Eagle and moved it over by the police station.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174634018
AndersAndersson (2025-11-14 12:15:47+00:00): Är det inte en adress med nummer 19 för den byggnaden?
Skistar Backoffice (2025-11-14 12:51:54+00:00): Jo, men vi har bestämt att vi inte vill ha numrering på husen  -då vi inte har det på något annat hus. // Christina, SkiStar Backoffice
Skistar Backoffice (2025-11-14 12:53:43+00:00): Har ni möjlighet att publicera denna byggnad, jag har väntat i snart en månad på att den ska visas på vår karta. 
Tack på förhand!
AndersAndersson (2025-11-14 13:19:13+00:00): Är det en officiell adress så ska husen ha detta. Om ni istället har egna husnummer som ej är postadresser så kan dessa skrivas som ref=19 istället för addr:number=19.

Openstreetmap är en databas där frivilliga läger in kartobjekt. På webplatsen finns ett antal exempelkartor. Dessa renderas oftast inom några minuter efter att ett objekt är inlagt. Ni använder förmodligen någon tjänst som använder Openstreetmaps data och gör en egen rendering på detta. Hur ofta eller sällan de hämtar och renderar data vet jag inte.
AndersAndersson (2025-11-14 13:29:14+00:00): Jag ser nu att ni använder Mapbox där man bokar stugor. De använder Openstreetmaps data i kombination med data från andra källor. Byggnader verkar inte komma från Openstreetmap då Vrilvägen är full av byggnader (som inte finns inritade i Openstreetmap).

Har du en länk till den kartan där byggnaden saknas?
Skistar Backoffice (2025-11-14 13:48:04+00:00): Hej igen, nu har jag lagt till ref. 19, men vi vill inte att numreringen syns på vår karta. Här är länk till vår karta till Vrilvägen 19C. https://www.skistar.com/sv/boka-online/boende/salen/lindvallen/grandgardarna/vrilvagen-19c-23869/?fl=4