piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
BigCactus (2025-07-24 12:07:01+00:00): Bonjour. Je confirme qu'il y a bien cette boite de retour de livres qui doit être lié à la bibliothèque locale (mais, ça reste une pure supposition). J'ai été moi même surpris de la voir contre la gare. Ceci dit, c'est vraiment le point de passage de beaucoup de gens qui vont et viennent d'Orléans Centre et ça fait du sens d'avoir un tel équipement présent ici. La place a bien changé en un an. Je passe par là de temps en temps (tous les 2 mois environ). La bibliothèque "les jacobins" n'est pas loin, mais il y a aussi la bibliothèque "René Guy Cadou" qui pourrait être impliquée. La mairie a déjà installé des boites de retour de livres dans le cadre d'un budget participatif (en 2022 au moins, et ça continue) et ce sont les habitants qui proposent des idées qui sont retenues par la mairie. J'irai faire une photo la prochaine fois que je passe devant cette boite de retour de livres. Bonne journée ! Raphaël / BigCactus
woodpeck (2025-07-11 19:00:36+00:00): Dear SantanaVII, thank you for your contributions to OSM. Could you be a little more specific with your changeset comments, and in the future explain what you corrected, instead of just writing "correction"? See also: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bons_commentaires_de_groupe_de_modifications
demon_box (2025-07-12 18:00:38+00:00): Ciao Benvenuto in OSM! Ti segnalo che in Italia il civico identifica il punto di accesso (entrata) e NON l'intero edificio. Infatti un edificio può avere più entrate e quindi più numeri civici. 
Quindi hai 2 opzioni: 
1. Se conosci esattamente la posizione (entrata) del civico che stai mappando metti tutti i tags dell'indirizzo su un nodo del perimetro dell'edificio (aggiungendo anche il tag entrance sullo stesso nodo);
2. Se invece non hai questa informazione così precisa devi mettere tutti i tags dell'indirizzo su nodo adiacente ma STACCATO dal poligono dell'edificio.
N.B.: Taggare l'indirizzo senza il numero civico (addr:housenumber) è un dato incompleto e perciò inconsistente, inutile. Se non conosci anche il n° civico meglio non mappare nulla.
Ho già proceduto con le correzioni del caso. Nello specifico ho isolato il civico 73 di Piazzetta Sant'Alessandro.
Grazie e BuonMapping!
kabelhaai (2025-07-11 19:18:28+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4686334
rempshaener (2025-07-16 19:05:48+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.
Ich habe zu den von dir vorgenommenen Änderungen Anmerkungen:
- Das Feld „couplings“ bleibt bei Unterflurhydranten leer, da es sich um die „Angabe der vorhandenen Anzahl an Schlauchanschlüssen“ handelt, siehe osm.wiki/DE:Key:couplings?uselang=de. Unterflurhydranten haben nur mit Standrohr eine Schlauchkupplung.
- fire_hydrant:diameter: Hier wird nur die Nennweite ohne das „H“ eingetragen.
- ref: wenn keine Nummer angegeben ist, bitte nicht „ohne Schild“ oder ähnliches eintragen, sondern ref:signed=no setzen.
- fire_hydrant:diameter: Ist die Nennweite unbekannt, bitte fire_hydrant:diameter:signed=no angeben.
- Hydranten sollten nicht mit Straßen, Gebäuden u. ä. verbunden werden. Das lässt sich leicht beheben: im Editor markieren und „E“ drücken – das löst den Hydranten von der Linie.

Vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag und weiterhin viel Spaß beim Mappen.
Viele Grüße
Leo Slager (2025-07-13 10:28:51+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Luc Gential (2025-08-06 10:09:39+00:00): Salut, On aurait deux refuges de même nom au nord et au sud du col de l'Aiguillette ?
Calvel bertrand (2025-08-06 10:34:39+00:00): bonjour, je comprends votre probleme, sur le site du refuge il y en a deux!!! En fait il n'y en a qu'un et c'est celui au sud du col. mais il est proche du triangle de chemin au S de l'aiguillette, a 200m à l'est du point de vue, pas dans la descente comme on le voit actuellement
Luc Gential (2025-08-06 12:49:55+00:00): J'ai supprimé le bâtiment au sud du col de l'Aiguillette. Le bon est situé au nord, près d'une zone humide. La webcam en atteste : https://www.skaping.com/monetier-les-bains/refuge-clot-vaches Je ne distingue aucun bâtiment au sud immédiat de l'Aiguillette du Lauzet sur les images satellites de 2025. Tout au plus, une bergerie est apparue sur les images de 2022, absente en 2019.
Calvel bertrand (2025-08-10 09:18:57+00:00): Désoolé vous avez raison, je me suis trompé sur la localisation du col de l'aiguillette
Rogoyski (2025-07-17 20:04:40+00:00): Zwróć proszę uwagę, że udało Ci się skasować w tym zestawie zmian przejście dla pieszych prze Bracką u wylotu na plac Trzech Krzyży, a także utracić niektóre atrybuty chodnika na przyległym przejściu dla pieszych przez Żurawią.

Mapując na podstawie podkładów Bing powinieneś je ponadto skalibrować, tj. zniwelować przesunięcie w stosunku do zdjęć z Geoportalu.
silversurfer83 (2025-07-13 19:05:04+00:00): Hi Corey,

another little tip: If something is pretty square in reality you can square the OSM object by using the "Q"-key on your keyboard. Try it with this roof of yours :)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1414151526

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168812730
NorthCrab_upload (2025-07-12 00:32:28+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2289952484
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2289951430
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2289957480
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2289965319
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/373787283
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/313087342
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/313087408
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/313087409

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/232965720

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2025-07-12 00:32:33+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/979366533
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1159680173

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
OSMCowboy (2025-07-28 18:39:49+00:00): Correction: Source used was ESRI World Imagery
pavvv (2025-07-12 14:43:19+00:00): wartość tagu note jest sprzeczna z treścią uwagi
maro21 (2025-07-12 20:16:54+00:00): Co dokładnie jest sprzeczne? "woda nie jest pitna" jest równoważne "woda niezdatna do spożycia".
pavvv (2025-07-13 11:15:37+00:00): A w tagu note jest napisane, że takiej informacji nie ma. Spodziewam się, że taka informacja jest i z tego powodu utworzono uwagę.
maro21 (2025-07-15 20:42:55+00:00): A, o to chodzi.
W 2012 roku, jak widać na zdjęciu, była tabliczka z informacją, że woda jest niezdatna do picia.
Potem tabliczkę usunięto, dlatego dodano tag [note] z informacją.
Obecnie nadal nie ma żadnej tabliczki z informacją czy woda jest pitna, czy nie. Nie wiadomo, czy ktoś zdjął tabliczkę, bo woda nie jest już niezdatna do picia (chociaż w każdym wypadku powinna być informacja), czy tabliczka się oderwała lub ktoś ukradł.
Woda jest zapewne z wodociągów, a taka woda jest pitna (w przeciwieństwie np. do wody z fontanny), ale informacji nie ma, więc nie będę zgadywał. Usunąłem tag amenity=drinking_water, który mówi o pitnej wodzie i zostawiłem tag man_made=water_tap. Zatem wszystko się zgadza i tak note też. Nie wiem, skąd zgłaszający uwagę wziął informację o niezdatności do picia.
NeisBot (2025-07-11 22:06:49+00:00): Hi ZOZO75, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Added a parcel locker with address and operator information."

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment #NoComment #AIgenerated
infeeeee (2025-07-18 20:28:15+00:00): No Foxpost locker here according to their website, only a GLS one. But it should have been imported last week. You can track the missing GLS lockers in this issue: https://github.com/KAMI911/osm_poi_matchmaker/issues/140
alessandrocarmeli (2025-07-14 14:23:44+00:00): occhio a https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1071924456
NeisBot (2025-07-11 21:36:35+00:00): Hi Piotr Kublicki, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 81% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 23 building(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=168814919
Piotr Kublicki (2025-07-11 21:54:42+00:00): Hey there, thanks for checking - I think there was a bunch of false positives for huts - check that out but they don't look like buildings, just markings in the ground.
NeisReview (2025-07-12 06:20:26+00:00): 👍 Thank you for your map updates.

#HappyMapping
joel56dt (2025-11-13 19:17:01+00:00): Hi, I have remove the extended turn lane. Unless they are physically separated, turn lanes should not be added as separate "ways". Thanks, Joel
Udarian (2025-07-12 00:18:07+00:00): next time please try and keep the geographic size of you change set down, for more info see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

it would be wonderful if next time you left a more informative change set comment, two hashtags doesn't tell me much, for more info see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

happy mapping,
Udar
rohieb (2025-07-11 22:40:24+00:00): Die südliche Einfahrt habe ich von highway=track auf highway=service + service=driveway geändert, da es sich hier nicht um einen Wirtschaftsweg handelt, sondern um eine Zufahrt zu einem Haus.
Leo Slager (2025-07-13 10:33:07+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
user_5359 (2025-07-12 09:28:56+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/12995075660. What is the mean of the tags
ele:Wenger = 1201
ref:Wenger = VB1
?
Is Wenger a measuring method or a manufacturer?
Hungerburg (2025-07-12 21:20:03+00:00): Hello there and welcome! These tags are on a POI that features in a scientific paper: ref:Wenger should be self-explaining - it is a reference to the name of the author of the paper and cites/quotes a shorthand to the resource there.

ele:Wenger I made up, because the ele given in the paper seems wrong to me, both from contour lines and from GPS readings, so I suffixed that during my edit to have it nevertheless in the data. Perhaps better ele:ref:Wenger1977 would be less confusing?

BTW: How did you spot that?
Comino (2025-07-15 07:30:21+00:00): Hi BitPinhall,

In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes".

Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag !
Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead.

For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Merchants#legacy-tags
and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bitcoin

Happy mapping,

Edwin
NeisBot (2025-07-12 00:33:53+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description
Fowler High Precision (2025-07-12 00:44:46+00:00): Fowler High Precision is recognized as one of the world's leading suppliers of high-quality inspection, control and calibration equipment. We continue to introduce new innovations in inspection and measurement in the metrology space. Fowler continues to Making Measurement Easy!
NeisReview (2025-07-12 06:18:49+00:00): #spam
NeisRevert (2025-07-12 06:19:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/168823538
where the changeset comment is: 
Remove spam
Mashin (2025-07-12 13:27:37+00:00): Hi,
here again, (in addition to add:full tag) this: "+1 203-846-['9', '4', '5', '0']" is not a valid value for telephone number.
It should be +1 203-8469;+1 203-8464;+1 203-8465;+1 203-8460

Problem is also in opening hours:
Mo 09:00-17:00; Tu 09:00-17:00; We 09:00-17:00; Th 09:00-17:00; Fr 09:00-17:00; Sa 10:00-16:00

Should be simplified to Mo-Fr 09:00-17:00; Sa 10:00-16:00

I would suggest to revert all import changestes, discuss and review your proposal with members of OSM first and then redo the import.
citrula (2025-07-12 01:54:44+00:00): this is in the middle of an intersection.
MikeN (2025-07-12 01:52:10+00:00): Welcome to OSM!   Note that there is already a node for Pella Windows and Doors in the correct position.  Imports should check for existing objects and add or correct information when necessary.
dcskobuffs (2025-08-01 20:57:28+00:00): Hello CubanBoi,

I see you have removed some ref tags such as on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/875656018 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/234908350 and transferred these to the unsigned_ref tag. It is difficult to verify this since there are not any apparent highway signs for these routes given the lack of open ground imagery for use in OSM. However, I am curious what if you know for certain that these routes have no signs anywhere along their extent? And if that is the case, if you think that keeping the ref tag in conjunction with the unsigned_ref is best would be more consistent with general OSM practices and for the benefit of all users of OSM, since on the tag’s wiki page (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:unsigned_ref) states, “This tag has not gone through a formal proposal/voting process”.

Our OSM mapping team maps only to the officially adopted policy of OSM and local community standards, and in this case, though we have no objection to you using the unsigned_ref tag, we feel that the main ref tag (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ref) is useful and in line with general mapping practices in OSM to retain it. Especially when you consider common practices such as consistent querying for relevant data. Additionally, the unsigned_ref tag is indicated to be used more for edge use-cases as is described on the tag’s wiki: ” ‘unsigned’ highway routes are typically used by road maintenance crews but not the general public”. 

I also wanted to ask if you know of any current surveys of the ref networks in Cuba and if you plan to change more highway tags soon?
Thank you. Looking forward to your response and have a good day.
dcskobuffs
Fizzie-DWG (2025-10-11 23:30:01+00:00): DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173159012
Mashin (2025-07-12 13:28:52+00:00): Here again addr:full should be expanded to individual fields.

Opening hours should be conflated.
Mashin (2025-07-12 13:22:19+00:00): Hi,
Sorry where was this import discussed?

The problem I see here that addr:full is not good way how to add address to POI. Especially it should not replace good address data that was already parsed to addr:* subfields.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-07-12 01:48:00+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18439
PerpetualHiker (2025-07-14 17:05:16+00:00): Correction: Source used was Esri World Imagery; Maxar Satellite Imagery via MGP Pro 2025-07-02; Mapillary
citrula (2025-07-12 04:25:16+00:00): Welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contribution. The name tag shouldn't be used for descriptive names like "Flock Ovilla" - it's totally fine for objects you add to not have a name.
auditor98 (2025-07-12 20:06:58+00:00): HI, I'm wondering why there is a name tag then if you are not to use it. Can you elaborate?
citrula (2025-07-12 21:02:29+00:00): Sure. OSM has a lot of tags - not all of them are applicable to every object. The editor tries to show you the ones that are most relevant for the type of object you have selected, but it doesn't mean that all of them are mandatory.

Regarding names specifically, the name=* tag is only for the actual name of the object in question, not descriptive names like "Flock Ovilla" or similar. This information can be captured in other ways, like the fact that it is contained within the Ovilla administrative boundary: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/114460 , and that the manufacturer is listed as Flock Safety.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

Hope this makes things a bit clearer! Happy mapping
Baloo Uriza (2025-07-12 21:33:49+00:00): though Place comes before East as well
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168819153
citrula (2025-07-12 04:23:03+00:00): Thanks for your contribution. description=* is not for marketing text. I went ahead and mapped this whole development - would appreciate it if you take a look and double-check my work :)

Thank you for uploading the mapillary coverage!
cgmimm23 (2025-07-12 13:07:55+00:00): thankyou
b-jazz (2025-07-12 03:06:19+00:00): hmm, not sure how that happened. sorry about that.
NeisBot (2025-07-12 03:23:45+00:00): Hello SL512, welcome to OSM, and thank you for your contributions!

I've taken a look at your recent edits and wanted to discuss a few discrepancies I noticed regarding the surrounding environmental features. Specifically, the locations in your edits don't seem to align with the typical geographical characteristics expected in that area. Here are some (max 10) relevant links to the edits:
https://osm.org/node/12995222416

Could you please take a look?
Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#Somewhere
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=168819893
NeisReview (2025-07-18 05:36:13+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168906800
Norbert Dichter (2025-07-12 10:42:33+00:00): Good work.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168820164
Hufkratzer (2025-07-12 20:37:09+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19345794 does not look like a horse riding arena (leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian) and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1412930874 does not look like an equestrian centre; the whole thing is probably this small racecourse: http://murotaht.web.fc2.com/
Compare
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a#Racecourse_(horse_racing)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/571204779 (example)
NeisBot (2025-07-12 03:54:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-07-18 05:35:46+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/168820418
StefDeGreef (2025-07-25 13:47:41+00:00): This one is on Ortho but has been removed as of 25-7-25 as per my field survey today

https://mapcomplete.org/blind_osm.html?z=17.3&lat=46.57081802822657&lon=0.3748769520029782&background=fr.ign.bdortho#node/1317288077
aaei924 (2025-08-03 19:24:31+00:00): <motorroad=yes> 태그는 이 바뀜집합에서 일괄로 적용한 것입니다. 참고하시기 바랍니다.
Warin61 (2025-11-20 07:32:04+00:00): Hi,
Do you check these routes meet the OSM requirements? 
The relation 4513980 has the ways in the reverse order... 
OSM Inspector shows quite a few of these ferry routs are incorrect...
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=151.23079&lat=-33.84752&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=ptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes%2Cptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes
donmac703 (2025-11-21 07:24:29+00:00): I looked at some of the ferry routes. Some of them needed more extensive work to be accurate (and probably compliant). One of the Oz moderators stuck his oar in, and I have focused on bus routes since then. There are so many bus routes I haven't gotten back to ferry routes and all of their problems.
user_5359 (2025-07-12 11:20:38+00:00): Hello1 Please be careful! You moved two nodes more than 100 meters (crossing other streets and buildings). I move the botth nodes back to the original position. Please check the situation.
Gregory Peony (2025-07-13 21:36:21+00:00): See my resolution in Changeset: 168891669. Accuracy is important when mapping; quality is much more desirable than quantity. Take care to make contributions that others can build upon. You can see how I mapped these footprints in the affore mentioned changeset. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168822091
Gregory Peony (2025-07-13 21:27:04+00:00): The building footprints you added were incorrectly tagged with the value river: I resolved the invalid tagging error. The footprints you mapped were inaccurate. The project you're working on requests the mapping of highways and waterways; please only modify other features if they are causing problems with mapping the requested features. You're likely restricted in the tagging available in ID so that you stick to the project scope. See Changeset: 168891442 for my resolution of the tagging. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168822395
Tommybara (2025-07-12 05:58:56+00:00): I don't find such edits as being "dirty". On the other hand, I find your edits to be quite annoying.
asatoku (2025-07-12 09:11:42+00:00): I don't understand why you deleted accurate information about communes/wards that previous users contributed. If you're going to revert edits, you should first verify whether the administrative boundaries are actually correct after the changes you've made.
Tommybara (2025-07-12 15:05:57+00:00): You reverted other mappers’ contributions just because of your “obsession” with “historic” boundaries. And the “products” you left are hundreds of broken boundaries that people have to fix for you.
Kovoschiz (2025-07-14 07:38:11+00:00): Please don't do mass undiscussed changes of `old_name*=` to `name=` and other `*_name=`
Gregory Peony (2025-07-14 00:50:07+00:00): Invalid building tagging; I addressed it. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168822626