piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Nakaner (2024-04-09 11:40:37+00:00): Hallo,

das sieht soweit erstmal gut aus. Ein paar Hinweise habe ich noch:

- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/387412294/history ist noch als Wiese erfasst. Das dürfte doch zumindest für das Firmengelände nicht mehr aktuell sein? Falls ja, bitte die Fläche anpassen.

- Stehen da explizite Tempo-30-Schilder auf dem Firmengelände? Falls nein, bitte kein Tempolimit erfassen.

Für das nächste Mal: Solange abgebaute Stromleitungen noch auf den Luftbildern erkennbar sind, ändern wir nur ihr power=minor_line in removed:power=minor_line. Sonst besteht die Gefahr, dass ein Ortsunkundiger aus der Ferne auf das Luftbild schaut und die "fehlende" Leitung wieder einträgt. In dem Fall stünden die Masten aber im Gebäude/auf dem Parkplatz, weshalb es nicht erforderlich ist.

Viele Grüße

Michael
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149763308
mavl (2024-04-09 08:10:51+00:00): This changeset is reverted.
asturksever (2024-04-09 12:17:16+00:00): It seems you deleted sidewalks geometries which I created in my local area. Please could you provide more details why did you remove sidewalk geometries? Sidewalk geometries are helpful for creating a walking/running routes on the apps which used OSM data.
rskedgell (2024-04-09 12:50:41+00:00): The details were provided in the changeset comment, to which you could have replied.

Sidewalks which do not connect to anything are *not* useful for creating running/walking routes. They're at best decorative and at worst spam.

The sidewalks added by you which connect to other highways are still there, together with sidewalk:$side on the parent highways.

I walk and run a lot in London and have added a lot of crossings and separate sidewalks. These are accurately mapped, actually work for routing and include accessibility features. Even after adding them with the best available aerial and street-side imagery, it's still worth walking the newly-added sidewalks with StreetComplete to add missing details.

Incidentally, in what way is London your local area? It's only just on the same continent.
https://hdyc.neis-one.org/?asturksever
Syl (2024-06-17 11:37:23+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai corrigé le type du club de bridge, ça n'a pas l'air d'être un endroit avec des machines à sous.
impiaaa (2024-04-09 17:19:18+00:00): Please be more specific about what you changed in each changeset. Read this page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments if you have any questions.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-04-09 08:25:44+00:00): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uw7oaHVskt4
Nakaner (2024-04-09 11:25:06+00:00): Hallo,

herzlich willkommen bei OSM.

Bitte klicke nicht nach jeder einzelnen Änderung auf Speichern, sondern lade mehrere inhaltlich zusammen gehörende Änderungen gebündelt hoch. Genau das ist der Sinn und zweck eines ÄnderungsSATZES.

Ferner möchte ich dich bitten, beim Hochladen einen aussagekräftigen Änderungssatzkommentar einzugeben, damit andere Mapper deine Änderungen besser nachvollziehen können.

Viele Grüße

Michael
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149764568
Gemeinde Nassereith (2024-04-09 11:44:54+00:00): Bitte entschuldige, das habe ich nicht gewusst. 

sg Martin
krza (2024-04-09 10:15:31+00:00): Schmeiß bitte nicht einfach überall die Layer-Tags raus. Die haben zum Teil eine Funktion. Danke. Ich werde die betroffenen Tags nun wieder setzen müssen und hoffe, dass ich alle relevanten erwische.
exarkun (2024-04-09 10:58:08+00:00): wieso ? die Gebäude schweben nicht in der Luft sondern stehen auf dem Boden
Nakaner (2024-04-09 11:18:02+00:00): Hallo krza,

Ich habe mir die Änderungen gerade angesehen und muss dir leider widersprechen. Das Entfernen der layer=*-Tags an den Gebäuden ist in diesem Fall nicht zu beanstanden.

layer=* wird erfasst, wenn mehrere Objekte übereinander liegen.  Das ist der Fall, wenn ein Vordach über einem Verkehrsweg liegt oder Verkehrswege/Gewässer sich höhenfrei kreuzen (Brücken/Tunnel/Dole).

Gerne darfst du die Frage mit anderen Mappern im Forum diskutieren.

Viele Grüße

Michael
krza (2024-04-09 12:13:28+00:00): Ich habe nicht von Gebäuden gesprochen. Es ging hier nicht um Gebäude. Aber genau das passiert, wenn man nicht ordentlich hinguckt und einfach mit Suchen/Ersetzen oder einer anderen Gießkanne operiert.

Bei den Gebäuden war es vermutlich überall korrekt. Keine Ahnung, warum die mal einen Layer bekommen haben. Aber der kann natürlich weg, ja.
exarkun (2024-04-14 09:52:30+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149808725
arcanma (2024-04-09 13:33:57+00:00): Benvenuto Simopone, grazie per la tua prima modifica.
Vedo che hai aggiunto vari elementi utili, il punto dell'ospedale invece non serve, anzi è un doppione, perché è già presente come relazione. È una struttura più complessa che si inserisce in modo più elaborato, forse per questo non l'hai notato
VictorIE (2025-04-11 15:53:01+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11681404055/
 
noexit=yes seems like the wrong tag here. Is it a blocked-up entrance?
ramthelinefeed (2025-04-11 15:59:56+00:00): Yes I believe it is blocked - for some reason there is a paved path with a solid 6 foot high wire mesh fence across it! You can see it on Google Maps Street View.
VictorIE (2025-04-11 17:36:25+00:00): I've disconnected the 'path' from the road to stop having noexit=yes or a highway=* (Osmose was whining about it).
dpolovinkin (2025-02-28 08:14:44+00:00): hi, thanks for contributing, but please don't change the tag of the whole building for barbershop as it's not correct, better to create a separate point. Will make it for you there :)
dpolovinkin (2025-02-28 08:16:16+00:00): ah, I see you already created a point. so I just fixed the building tag
BCNorwich (2024-04-10 06:40:53+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I just wanted to point out the several warnings given above. Some warnings are given to alert to possible but not actual errors, these may not need fixing. Other warnings like "warnings:crossing_ways:highway-waterway" should be fixed as they quite likely point to incorrect mapping.

I've fixed a few problems here.

Regards Bernard.
tekim (2024-04-09 21:19:34+00:00): Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap!  It is great to have you as part of our community of map enthusiasts.  Thanks for your edit to the map and the helpful changeset comment.  In that comment, you mention "Google Maps."  Unfortunately, when editing OpenStreetMap we are not allowed to use Google Maps due to Google's terms of service.
tekim (2024-04-09 21:19:52+00:00): Reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149795239
Frans S (2024-04-09 09:17:28+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. ( I reviewed all your changesets till now today) You forget to square the buildings sometimes.


Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149765596
Filip009 (2024-04-10 06:02:08+00:00): Zdravím, prečo ste to všetko revertol? Nie všetko bolo zle. Písal ste si predtým s autorom daných zmien, aby to nerobil v budúcnosti?
CapitaineMoustache (2024-06-01 14:48:35+00:00): Bonjour,
Je vois que vous avez modifié le tag "landuse=residential" autour de Auch, du coup, il n'y a plus aucun rendu.
Même si les contours ne sont pas à jour, il ne me semble pas opportun de masquer complètement cette occupation du sol qui demeure pour la plus grande partie valide.
Les retouches peuvent être faites au fur et à mesure.

Je vous propose donc de rétablir ce landuse=residential.

Qu'en dites-vous ? :)

Bonne continuation !
FVanh (2024-06-03 07:18:45+00:00): Bonjour,

Le tag "landuse=residential" sert normalement à définir des quartiers résidentiel, l'utilisation sur toute la ville était inadéquate et empêchait certaines autres modification, d'où le changement.

Cordialement,
CapitaineMoustache (2024-06-03 10:45:15+00:00): Bonjour,

J'avoue ne pas saisir. Une des fonctions première des villes est justement d'être résidentielle.
Les centres-villes sont inclus dans cette définition car malgré leur multifonctionnalisme, il est tacitement admis que la fonction résidentielle demeure la principale.
Cette définition diffère suivant les pays dans OSM (voir en Angleterre par exemple) mais en France, la plupart des villes sont zonnées ainsi : voyez Toulouse, Paris, Bordeaux, Mont-de-Marsan, Gimont...

Ne se distingue généralement que les zones industrielles, commerciales à fonction unique (voiturocentrées en général et en périphérie).

Pour avoir tracé moi-même le contour de ce landuse à partir d'une imagerie aérienne en 2019, et après vérification, il me semble que le tracé demeure largement valide.

Quelle est votre logique d'amélioration ?
CapitaineMoustache (2024-06-11 21:53:22+00:00): Bonjour,

Je crois avoir compris votre logique ;). Je viens de voir que vous avez créé une relation sur ce "landuse=residential" qui contient des informations sur la commune d'Auch.
Attention ! ce périmètre n'a rien à voir avec la commune d'Auch.
Une relation "boundary=administrative" existe déjà qui contient toutes ces informations, comme toutes les communes en France.
C'est ce périmètre auquel correspond toutes les statistiques communales comme la population.
Voir ici : https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/128184#map=13/43.6557/0.5903

Ces périmètres n'ont la plupart du temps pas à être retouchés. Des contributeurs expérimentés s'occupent de leur mise à jour.

Je vous propose d'effectuer un "revert", c'est-à-dire un retour à la version précédente vos modifications sur ce "landuse=residential".

Sans réponse de votre part d'ici 3 jours, je considérerai que vous êtes d'accord.

N'hésitez pas si vous avez des questions et bonne continuation sur OSM !
Frans S (2024-04-09 09:29:57+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped.  All changesets till now have been reviewed.  Well and accurate mapped. However, sometimes you included the shadow of the building.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149766012
Frans S (2024-04-09 09:22:48+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
The changesets of today are reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Inaccurate mapped buildings. 
Included shadow of the building into your mappings.
Followed treelines rather than extrapolating roofline.
Not all buildings are squared.

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149766248
Frans S (2024-05-16 10:24:36+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Inaccurate mapped.

buildings not squared.

Connected nodes of buildings.

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149766559
FirefighterCGH (2024-11-11 16:41:07+00:00): Servus,
der Radweg entlang der LA 21 ist nur durch einen Bordstein von der Fahrbahn getrennt. Deshalb wird er in OSM mit Tags an der Straße beschrieben. (Diese sind übrigens immer noch vorhanden, also falls Radwege separat gemappt werden, bitte immer auch die alte Version löschen). Nachlesen wann was gilt kann man hier: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen_kartieren#Stra%C3%9Fenbegleitende_Wege
Viele Grüße
FirefighterCGH (2024-11-11 16:42:59+00:00): P.S. Auf der Straße liegen auch einige Radweg-Relationen, die auch vergessen wurden. Ich hab den separaten Weg wieder entfernt, damit's passt.
Frans S (2024-04-09 10:28:34+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Buildings not squared

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149766697
Frans S (2024-04-09 10:22:31+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Mappings oversized.

Clustered buildings.

included shadow of the building into the mapping.




Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149766706
Frans S (2024-04-09 10:20:37+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
See my previous comment on a changeset.
This changeset shows the same issues.
Please do not include a shadow of a building into a mapping.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149766710
Frans S (2024-04-09 09:38:54+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
These changeset of totday are reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
In general well mapped.
Issues :
when there is no shadow, it's probably not a building.
Don't cluster buildings.

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149766990
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-01 10:00:19+00:00): This feature https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/155108822 has recently been edited by several new contributors. It might be worth taking a closer look at some of the latest changes, as they seem a bit unusual ... 🤷‍♂️
TrickyFoxy (2026-04-01 10:43:55+00:00): I'm afraid this problem is currently impossible to solve. These are students from some university who are being tasked with editing OSM in this place. And then, exactly a year later, they came back...
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-01 10:50:45+00:00): Thanks for the reply. I do not think this is impossible to address, it is more about deciding how we want to deal with it :)
Frans S (2024-04-09 10:18:17+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Not always accurate mapped.

Buildings not squared.

Buildings oversized.


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149767230
Frans S (2024-04-09 09:47:23+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
I reviewed all changesets issues by you today.
You mapped with a serious offset. Correct that please.
Be more accurate at mapping complex buildings. Most corners are 90 degr.
Not squared buildings


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149767416
GEO ECLA (2024-04-09 21:30:26+00:00): Tag religion sur une école publique ?
Frans S (2024-04-09 10:07:03+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and well mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149767550
Vivek Dumre (2024-05-23 16:33:21+00:00): Good Mapping, keep contributing.#OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149767612
Frans S (2024-04-09 10:51:56+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Quite a lot of buildings oversized !

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149767643
Leo Slager (2024-04-09 22:09:41+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Frans S (2024-04-09 10:31:55+00:00): Hello. See my previous comment on your mappings.
The same issues are valid here as well.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149767681
Frans S (2024-04-12 12:29:48+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149767834
Frans S (2024-04-09 10:24:51+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149767865
Frans S (2024-04-09 11:55:49+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
In general, well mapped.
But some issues:
Non squared Buildings.
Rectangular building mapped as round building.
Sometimes oversized.
Sometimes included a shadow.



Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149767964