piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
dcapillae (2025-08-22 07:39:40+00:00): Hola, MigRol.

Gracias por los cambios.

He hecho algunas pequeñas correcciones, nada importante.

En cuanto a la etiqueta a utilizar para una tienda de sonido profesional, dado que no vende instrumentos musicales sino equipos de sonido, creo que sería más conveniente etiquetarla como «shop=hifi».  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dhifi

Para aclarar que es una tienda orientada a producción musical, he añadido la siguiente descripción en la etiqueta «description»: 

«Tienda especializada en equipos de audio profesional para músicos, DJs, técnicos de sonido y entusiastas del sonido. Ofrece mesas de mezcla, micrófonos, amplificadores, monitores de estudio, cables y más».

Atentamente,
Daniel Capilla
Fizzie-DWG (2025-08-23 05:28:44+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18649
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-09-17 22:19:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 172087218 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some vandalism in Cairo.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18743
BCNorwich (2025-08-22 07:43:36+00:00): Fiction removed.
Glassman (2025-08-22 18:38:48+00:00): #TIP: square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170805584
beddy (2025-09-01 03:22:05+00:00): The 'Sidewalk' you added along the west side of Pershing, likely among others, does NOT exist.
beddy (2025-09-01 03:25:18+00:00): As well in this same changelist there are sidewalks that intersection on top of an overpass and under the overpass, without even a bridge along the overpass.
nevw (2025-08-22 01:43:06+00:00): Hi, 20 and 22 Falconer Street building should be drawn as two separate houses
hoserab (2025-08-27 23:06:44+00:00): FYI I've manually reverted your change to the position of the red-light camera at 14th Street & Heritage Drive, and deleted the speed enforcement relation you created. (See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171107237)

With respect to the camera location: if Organic Maps can't figure out how to implement this it's on them. We're not going to fudge the OSM data. 

With respect to the speed enforcement relation you added: FYI municipalities were forced to remove the speed enforcement capabilities of their intersection cameras earlier this year. The provincial government issued a guideline that strictly forbids speed cameras at intersections (in addition to much more stringent photo radar implementation rules elsewhere). See https://www.alberta.ca/intersection-safety-devices . These sorts of intersection cameras only do red-light enforcement now, province-wide.
Frans S (2025-08-22 09:40:02+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
A remark.
When mapping waterways, please start at the source direction to the collector (river, lake, other stream)
So the flow direction is correct.
To change the flow direction:
In Ideditor: right click on the waterway and select << to change the direction,
Best regards
pwbriggs (2025-08-24 08:09:21+00:00): Thanks for the contributions. Isn't this building a house, though? I know the other buildings surrounding are mostly just tagged as generic "buildings," but that's only because nobody's checked what kind of building they are yet. Please feel free to change any houses tagged as buildings to be mapped as houses instead.

Thanks again, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-08-24 04:25:55+00:00): reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170906245
Comino (2025-08-22 11:20:39+00:00): Hi,

In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes".

Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag !
Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead.

For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Merchants#tagging-guidance
and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bitcoin

Happy mapping,

Edwin
Taya_S (2025-09-01 07:25:52+00:00): Reverted fictional edits

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171299937
Taya_S (2025-09-01 07:24:52+00:00): Reverted fictional edits

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171299896
Taya_S (2025-09-01 07:26:03+00:00): Reverted fictional edits

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171299941
happilymappingrway (2025-09-05 23:50:16+00:00): The US Postal Service requires the use of prefixes in all street names for the delivery of mail, therefore I think you should revert your removals of prefixes. This causes chaos for residents for mail and GPS navigation In cars and on phones. The Phoenix area uses directional prefixes throughout, so prefixes are necessary for street names that extend across the region.
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-09-09 15:01:06+00:00): According to streetlevel imagery, not all street signs in the area display directional prefixes. Therefore, adding them would be a violation of the "on-the-ground" rule. This doesn't even count the fact that some streets' directional prefixes are "mismatched" (i.e., "North Main Street" without "South Main Street"). However, because these are still important for addresses, I've preserved them in `name:full` and `name:prefix`, in line with what Utah does.
TheArguer (2025-09-17 01:00:46+00:00): The Utah approach was specifically agreed upon by users local to that community. For a number of reasons, mapping the grid system in Maricopa County does not lend itself as well to the approach taken in Utah. The on-the-ground rule is just as much "how the locals refer to it" as it is "what the street signs say." Have you considered why so many of the streets you've updated have had the prefix for 15 years, and why within that time no other users have attempted to remove them? I also agree that you should revert all your edits to remove prefixes to Phoenix area streets or at least bring this to the community forum so you can get perspective from local users.
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-09-17 02:18:03+00:00): No, I'll admit it: I don't know why they haven't been removed. I didn't explain this earlier, but I didn't remove ALL directional prefixes, just the mismatched ones. Why weren't they removed anyway?
TheArguer (2025-09-17 04:10:06+00:00): They weren't removed because they are part of the official street names. This is evidenced by the fact that non-LED street signs at all City of Phoenix intersections (i.e., ones that aren't at stoplights) include both the prefix and suffix. This is also the case for most all street signage at intersections without traffic lights in Glendale, Peoria, Mesa, Gilbert, Tempe, Scottsdale, and Chandler, among other cities. Even if a city in the metro decided for aesthetic or other reasons to not have the prefix in their signage, the streets are all part of the same or similar grid systems, and the official name used by locals would still include the prefix.
TheArguer (2025-10-09 00:57:37+00:00): Hi, I’m planning to revert this changeset, as well as the others where you removed prefixes in the Phoenix area, based on my understanding of the on-the-ground rule (i.e., prefixes are consistently signed across the metro, this isn’t Utah). Let me know if you have any concerns.
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-10-09 06:40:23+00:00): I've already stated my concerns and objections to their removal; please read above to find them. Thanks.
watmildon (2026-01-16 04:49:14+00:00): Hello. I have stumbled upon this set of edits and agree it should be reverted. Name fields in the US include directional and types when they are know (signed or from address data etc). If you have a rendered or app that you'd like to not see those in, well, ask the owner of that to eliminate them in their pipeline.

As it's been a few months and the changes are broad, I am going to ask the dwg to do this reversion.

In the future, I suggest you work the broader community before making such sweeping edits. It will save you some time and keep things rolling more smoothly.
pwbriggs (2026-01-16 06:49:20+00:00): For transparency, linking to OSMUS Slack thread regarding these changes: https://osmus.slack.com/archives/CCJ2P6KCH/p1768535533160899.

Thanks!
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-01-16 19:31:28+00:00): I am unable to access that link, as I need an email address from OSM itself to access Slack.
watmildon (2026-01-16 20:54:33+00:00): You don't need any particular email provider to join. Anyone can join from this link. https://slack.openstreetmap.us/
watmildon (2026-01-16 21:48:48+00:00): This has been opened with DWG as Ticket#2026011610000455.
Glassman (2025-08-22 18:44:20+00:00): If the church is the only occupant of a building, just tag the building outline.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170808029
cubbe8 (2025-08-22 04:02:11+00:00): review request was an accident
Glassman (2025-08-24 16:50:46+00:00): I typically tag the wooded areas as natural=wood since forest implies that it is logged. And while most of it is, there may be sections that are not.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170808324
Jimmyisawkward (2025-08-24 17:02:29+00:00): Ok gotcha; I just figured since a majority was logged, I went with that. (And it’s a pain/impossible to differentiate) Ig if that is the agreed upon standard for us in WA, I’ll switch to that.
Glassman (2025-08-24 17:28:00+00:00): Not sure if tagging of wooded areas has been discussed, but it would be good to bring it up on Slack.
Glassman (2025-08-22 18:47:30+00:00): #TIP: when multiple business occupy a building, just add a node for each business. Can you restore the building to its original shape and add nodes for the business?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170808344
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-30 19:29:49+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1424037074/history has building = serviceq that was added in this edit
building=serviceq ? Maybe intention was to use building=service and then square area?
EPMPaul (2025-12-04 17:43:36+00:00): Hello. Bad case of fat finger. i fixed the tag. Great catch!
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-05 08:08:41+00:00): glad to hear that this was useful!
Glassman (2025-08-22 18:52:45+00:00): Thanks for adding a name. Can you also add a tag to describe what kind of business The Heights Learning Center does?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170809196
❤️‍🔥 (2025-08-22 13:28:32+00:00): Malaghans Road is nowhere near here, either the location of this node or the address needs to change
ralley (2025-08-25 00:47:03+00:00): Additionally some tags have been updated an not others (check_date; contact:*; email; mobile etc) which make this POI a weird combination of two businesses
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170809378
Glassman (2025-08-22 18:56:23+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170809398
phoenixsaigon1698 (2025-08-22 06:24:23+00:00): 19340229 biển báo này cũng mất thành phần, nhờ bạn kiểm tra lại. Cám ơn bạn.
Glassman (2025-08-22 18:51:31+00:00): #TIP: Instead of adding a building inside of an existing building, just add a node for the business. Can you fix this?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170809587
Glassman (2025-08-22 18:59:27+00:00): It would help adding the type of business is located inside of the building such as amenity=casino. Also, it Casino the actual name of the business? Seems rather generic.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170809846
eggie (2025-08-22 06:25:44+00:00): Dag Fedde,

Even een vraag neergelegd bij de BAG importeurs over die adresnodes hier. Dat zou inderdaad Sint Gerardusplein moeten zijn, maar de adresnodes geven allemaal Sint Gerarduslaan aan in OSM. 
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/bag-importverzoeken/3394/3690

Groet
eggie
Glassman (2025-08-22 18:56:31+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170809912
Glassman (2025-08-22 19:02:12+00:00): The landuse residential + residential=suburban would be better just as landuse=residential. A suburban is usually a much larger area.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170810096
Glassman (2025-08-22 18:56:16+00:00): It looks more like a highway=service instead of a living street, which is very unusual in the US.  Can you review this edit?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170810323
eggie (2025-08-22 06:29:47+00:00): Fedde... en dat zou dan ook Eindhoven Gerarduskerk header

Eindhoven Gerarduskerk

Sint Gerardusplein 25

5644NG Eindhoven moeten zijn en niet Sint Gerarduslaan. Ik heb een herïmportverzoek lopen op het forum. 
Gr eggie
rle32795 (2025-08-22 07:13:43+00:00): Eiks vanhat polut pidä kuitenkin säilyttää, kun ne voivat olla vielä olemassa (ihan vaikka pusikoituneinakin)?
Karttakeisari (2025-08-22 07:21:34+00:00): No pitää tosiaan. Heittelin vanhat ensin roskikseen, jotta sain tehtyä tiet kuntoon, mutta unohdin tietysti tehdä tämän uusiksi. Korjasin.
eggie (2025-08-22 06:36:30+00:00): Dag MK ,  'Some little things' zegt niemand iets. Graag concreet commentaar toevoegen bij de je uploads. 

Belona BV staat al op de kaart. De dubbele vermelding heb ik verwijderd.
Alleen een naam doet trouwens niets in OSM.
horse=no lijkt me niet nodig. (Ruiterverbod?) 
Wellicht access=private op het hek ipv permit?

MVG
eggie
Glassman (2025-08-22 19:11:01+00:00): Food trucks should be tagged as street_vendor=yes. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:street_vendor%3Dyes for more details on how to tag. Can you review this edit?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170812134
Patchi (2025-08-23 06:05:04+00:00): Bonjour Julien39,

Je ne suis pas sur que la modification de la ligne maitre de bus 5 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9091034) et la ligne de bus 5 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9091032) à Saint-Raphaël soient correctes. Je doute que l'opérateur de ces lignes soit "Transdev Oise Cabaro". De plus le network:wikidata renvoie sur un réseau de transport en commun de Clermont-Ferrand. Les départements de l'Oise du Puy-de-Dôme sont plutôt éloignés du département du Var.

S'agit-il d'une mauvaise manipulation avec iD ? (les anciennes valeurs me paraissaient tout à fait correctes)

Bonne continuation,

Patchi.
Julien39 (2025-08-25 15:43:17+00:00): Bonjour Patchi, oui en effet, j'ai validé la modification proposée par iD, désolé donc !
Je corrige.
Bonne journée,
Julien
literan (2025-08-23 11:27:20+00:00): не надо ставить access=permit, это означает что может въехать любой, получив формальное разрешение
literan (2025-08-23 11:28:17+00:00): https://yandex.ru/maps/-/CHxdeZzM там же написано, что въезд только по пропускам

motor_vehicle=private
buy_osmand (2025-08-28 08:30:00+00:00): I have additionally called branch phone number  
Phone: 6241 6622, and it returned `invalid number`
http://www.spaflora.com.sg/qql/slot/u1844/index.htm

Your good works current & future, without monetary compensation is highly recognized.
This edit so GOOD 😳👍
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170813030
user_5359 (2025-08-22 10:47:39+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You are NOT a church! Reverted by https://www.osm.org/changeset/170823946.
For a better description (if you can't find any examples or ask anyone else), please visit our wiki at https://wiki.osm.org.
borishag (2025-08-28 10:48:33+00:00): Ook hier, Waarom vermelden dat je in winkels niet mag roken terwijl dat een algemene landelijke regel is
Syl (2025-08-22 07:17:57+00:00): Bonjour, merci pour cette modification, je me suis permis de corriger deux choses :
- j'ai enlevé le numéro du bâtiment vu qu'il est maintenant sous forme de point, un numéro ne doit être présent qu'une seule fois et nous privilégions localement de les mettre sur des points plutôt que sur les bâtiments.
- j'ai enlevé la ville et le code postal, ils sont déjà renseignés sous forme de zones, du coup il n'y a pas de besoin des les ajouter sur chaque objet.

Bonne journée.
Yog Sot (2025-08-22 08:30:45+00:00): jak zwykle robi błędy i nie naprawia po sobie
RSydes (2026-05-01 23:43:39+00:00): What sources did you use for the names of the savannas and groves within Orland Grassland?
Ronyu (2026-05-28 21:12:07+00:00): its been a while but I'm pretty sure its from the image at the bottom of this website: https://www.orlandgrassland.org/looking-at-the-land#dataItem-ipq3q9ei
Wish_F (2026-05-02 08:21:25+00:00): こんにちは。
この編集セットで、同じ場所の建物が二重、三重にトレースされている箇所がありましたので修正させていただきました。
JOSMを使っていらっしゃるようですので、トレースの際は、データをダウンロードしていただき、重複しないようご配慮いただけたらと思います。
よろしくお願いします。
seele365 (2026-05-02 09:33:09+00:00): お世話になります。
この部分は、以前からトレースしてあった物を再トレースしたものと記憶しています。
以後注意します。
ご指摘ありがとうございました。
bartgron (2025-08-22 21:39:21+00:00): What is this place of worship?
pavvv (2025-08-24 22:40:35+00:00): Ile razy mam Ci powtarzać, że to część głównej trasy N-S przez Wrocław? Dlatego trasa W-Z ma być secondary, ale N-S już nie?
Poza tym duża część drogi ma dość dobre parametry, lepsze niż drogi tertiary w okolicy, jak np. Szpitalna.

Zobacz sobie też ile samochodów skręca w Zaporoską i natężenie ruchu na niej.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-08-26 13:02:15+00:00): do was obu prośba: przestańcie z wojną edycyjną na https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/16767491/history

zróbcie wątek na forum i zapytajcie innych jak nie idzie dogadanie się, a do tego czasu przywróćcie stan wyjściowy
maraf24 (2025-08-26 13:34:49+00:00): >Dlatego trasa W-Z ma być secondary,

Bo taka trasa jest jedna, nie ma jej czym za bardzo zastąpić.

>ale N-S już nie?

Wrocław nie ma układu dróg dla takiej trasy. Ruch na N-S odbywa się wieloma drogami . I nie wynika z tego, że mają one być wszystkie secondary.
Dlatego, zanim zacząłeś wrzucać dziesiątki dróg secondary do centrum Wrocławia, było ich tak mało, a na kierunku N-S kończyło się na Armii Krajowej. Zmieniłeś to bez konsultacji, a od 1.5 roku walczysz z konsekwencjami tej zmiany i wprowadzasz kolejne secondary by jakoś ten ruch rozprowadzić.

Zaporoską znam, nie kwalifikuje się na secondary, tylko na łącznik między secondary. Czyli tertiary.
pavvv (2025-08-28 17:22:11+00:00): > Wrocław nie ma układu dróg dla takiej trasy. Ruch na N-S odbywa się wieloma drogami.

Mam na myśli ruch z dwóch końców DK5, gdzie droga przez centrum przebiega Bałtycką, Podwalem, Zaporoską, PŚ, tak samo jak z dwóch końców DK94 przez centrum droga przebiega przez Krakowską, Traugutta, Kazimierza Wielkiego, Legnicką. Drogi Psie Pole - południe nie nazwałbym drogą N-S.

> I nie wynika z tego, że mają one być wszystkie secondary.

Kategoria ważnej drogi przelotowej przez miasto to na pewno nie jest nic poniżej secondary.

> Dlatego, zanim zacząłeś wrzucać dziesiątki dróg secondary do centrum Wrocławia, było ich tak mało

Uważam, że zmiany, jakie wprowadziłem są prawidłowe. To był jakiś absurd, że PŚ miało niższą kategorię od Grabiszyńskiej i równą Stawowej.

Czym, według Ciebie, powinna być kategoria secondary w mieście?
tomhukins (2025-09-21 18:02:00+00:00): Thank you for your helpful work improving the map.

I notice you have tagged two ways for Briscoe Lane in this change as "sidewalk:both:surface=traffic_island" which seems odd as "traffic_island" seems like a confusing value for a "surface" to me.

Is this a mistake or does the value have some meaning I haven't worked out?

The ways are https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1424065428 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/697319897
rskedgell (2025-09-22 07:30:39+00:00): No, that was a fat finger error on my part. Thanks for spotting it, removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172278492
marc__marc (2025-12-05 14:34:55+00:00): Bonjour Stéphane,
oü as-tu trouvé cette ref en FR*HPC*S ?
je ne trouve aucun code S dans la doc, je n'en ai jamais vu
c'est soit P pour la station soit E pour le point de chaque véhicule
Cordialement,
Marc
marc__marc (2025-12-05 14:36:03+00:00): je parle de l'objet https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13088725796
StephaneP (2025-12-05 15:33:12+00:00): Salut Marc,
Je l'ai trouvée tout simplement ... sur la borne.
Je croise régulièrement ces ref en "S". Je n'ai pas encore tout à fait saisi s'il s'agissait de la borne ou du connecteur (indépendamment de la ref du point de charge). Ici ça fait vraiment référence à la borne puisque c'est une version raccourcie des ref des PDC.

https://panoramax.openstreetmap.fr/?background=streets&focus=pic&map=22.63/47.15978411/-1.5113976&pic=911d2edf-0118-4d58-bb17-4b2153c5de45&seq=babf2355-4dd0-4c82-bd4b-be1ef22cd4d9&speed=250&theme=age&xyz=192.00/0.00/30
StephaneP (2025-12-05 15:35:04+00:00): Au passage, venant de ma part tu trouveras aussi parfois des socket=separate sur les stations pour indiquer que les informations des connecteurs sont ailleurs, sur les nodes man_made=charge_point.
A discuter.
marc__marc (2025-12-05 23:55:35+00:00): Merci pour le retour.
c'est vraiment étrange, je vais leur écrire pour avoir plus d'explication car la ref européenne pour une station est avec un P et pas un S, celle du point de recharge est avec un E.
FR*HPC*ENF078078*004*1 est introuvable dans l'opendata.
Il y a une station ayant comme adresse "Grassiniere" mais elle a comme ref FR*HPC*PNF042595
je serrais tenté de déplacé la ref du terrain dans ref malgré son format qui fait penser à une ref européenne et mettre la ref de l'opendata dans ref:EU:EVSE, qu'en penses-tu ?

Je comprend l'envie de ne pas dupliquer les sockets à 2 endroits, mais cela complique une éventuelle réutilisation (qui malheureusement est quasi inexistante à cause du retard d'osm sur le sujet)
marc__marc (2025-12-06 00:14:30+00:00): j'ai terminé mon message trop vite, je viens de voir que FR*HPC*PNF042595 est renseigné sur la borne sur l'aire du même nom mais de l'autre coté de la route à l'ouest
En ouvrant l'opendata dans josm, je trouve 2 ref de station (l'une ayant débutant en mai et l'autre en décembre)
FRHPCPNF078078
FRHPCPNF088078
les points de recharge sont :
FRHPCENF078078001
FRHPCENF078078002
FRHPCENF078078003
FRHPCENF078078004
Aucune trace du FR*HPC*S dans l'opendata
StephaneP (2025-12-06 08:01:48+00:00): Pour les socket:separate je pense qu'il vaudrait mieux en parler sur le forum.

Je ne comprends pas pourquoi tu voudrais ajouter la ref de la station sur le noeud man_made=charge_point. Cette ref est déjà présente sur la station : https://www.osm.org/way/1424066558

Si tu vois 2 refs, c'est à cause du bazar engendré par les doublons entre les données opérateur et celle de qualicharge.

On ne peut pas mettre FR*HPC*S sur le tag ref car il est déjà occupé par le numéro de borne, ici 4.
On pourrait créer un tag ref:stall= ou autre chose, mais puisque la construction de cette ref est calquée sur les autres ref EVSE, ça me paraissait pertinent. A discuter.