piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
MartinBook (2026-01-22 09:00:14+00:00): Hi Taya,
Thanks for your email. Under NZ health and safety laws, if someone hurts themselves while walking on my land, even if uninvited, then I am liable. We've had people coming onto our land because of these tracks. The person who mapped these tracks if from the UK, where things are very different to how they are here. Can I please send you a list of tracks that he has created so you can remove them for me.
Kind regards
Martin
NeisBot (2026-01-22 08:26:16+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your changesets and noticed that the cumulative count of your recent edits (2 changesets) shows that 427 of your last 437 changes were deletions. This is quite an unusual proportion, so I wanted to check with you.

Could you please confirm whether these deletions were intentional or if they may have occurred by mistake?

#DeletionsCheck #Cumulative
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?uid=21886528
MartinBook (2026-01-22 08:42:43+00:00): Hi there,

I own this land, its private, and I don't want it mapped.

These aren't road, barely tracks.

Thank you
Mark

PS: Deleting isn't particularly easy if you have to do it one node at a time - maybe there's an easier way?
You start by deleting nodes on a track, you hold down the delete button and its busily deleteing the track, and suddenly it starts deleting an adjacent river.
Maybe there is a way to do a deletion of a whole track at a time?
MartinBook (2026-01-22 09:00:37+00:00): Hi Taya,
Thanks for your email. Under NZ health and safety laws, if someone hurts themselves while walking on my land, even if uninvited, then I am liable. We've had people coming onto our land because of these tracks. The person who mapped these tracks if from the UK, where things are very different to how they are here. Can I please send you a list of tracks that he has created so you can remove them for me.
Kind regards
Martin
NeisBot (2026-01-22 08:26:21+00:00): Hi MartinBook, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 97% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 8 highway(s)
- 3 name(s)
- 2 surface(s)
- 2 waterway(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177553826
MartinBook (2026-01-22 08:43:10+00:00): Hi there,

I own this land, its private, and I don't want it mapped.

These aren't road, barely tracks.

Thank you
Mark

PS: Deleting isn't particularly easy if you have to do it one node at a time - maybe there's an easier way?
You start by deleting nodes on a track, you hold down the delete button and its busily deleteing the track, and suddenly it starts deleting an adjacent river.
Maybe there is a way to do a deletion of a whole track at a time?
MartinBook (2026-01-22 08:59:31+00:00): Hi Taya, 
Thanks for your email. Under NZ health and safety laws, if someone hurts themselves while walking on my land, even if uninvited, then I am liable. We've had people coming onto our land because of these tracks. The person who mapped these tracks if from the UK, where things are very different to how they are here. Can I please send you a list of tracks that he has created so you can remove them for me. 
Kind regards
Martin
Taya_S (2026-01-22 09:13:59+00:00): Hello Martin,

I'm sorry, but we do not delete objects that are present on the ground. It doesn't really matter to us who mapped them or where that person came from.  

Given that the woods, streams, and paths you deleted are plainly visible on aerial imagery, I see no reason to delete them. I have gone ahead and added access=private to all the paths inside the reserve that weren't tagged as such yet to indicate that these paths cannot be used by the general public. 

Best regards,
Taya Snijder
NeisBot (2026-01-23 06:54:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/31818726 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Pet store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-30 07:09:13+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177876609
(No visible changes after review)
NeisBot (2026-01-23 06:47:59+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 24 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/760840855 v1 | 15 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1327380447 v1 | 9 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/7108078120 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177554124
pitscheplatsch (2026-01-24 14:22:14+00:00): Hi, just a test?
GerdP (2026-06-04 08:13:11+00:00): Moin aus Wildeshausen!
Ich radel da regelmässig vorbei. Der (bzw. ein) Wohnwagen mit Herzen steht da oft, aber nicht immer. Gehört aus meiner Sicht so nicht in OSM.
turbopixel (2026-06-05 13:38:02+00:00): Klingt vielmehr nach einem Love Mobil was, meiner Meinung nach, ein Temporäres Objekt ist.
NeisBot (2026-01-23 06:54:46+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/399905027 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Kervansaray Antique Hotel"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-01-30 07:09:14+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/177622580
GrabTH_Bulakorn (2026-01-22 08:58:31+00:00): Source: Esri World Imagery (Aerial Imagery)
Warin61 (2026-04-04 01:17:39+00:00): Hi
Mulitploygon relation 20125744 residential deleted shared segments. 

Replaced with one simple way. A relation is not required.
NeisBot (2026-01-23 06:54:48+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/1469409000 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Marquage industriel entreprise"
---
Par exemple, une version plus neutre et factuelle de ton texte pourrait être : "Marquage industriel entreprise"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-30 07:09:14+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177876610
(No visible changes after review)
Map_HeRo (2026-02-06 12:05:25+00:00): Danke für die Korrektur, das war so ein typischer copy und paste Fehler nach der 20. Bearbeitung ... :-/
Udarian (2026-01-22 23:30:30+00:00): quick question, can you please look again and see if as part of this construction sidewalks have been added along Northwest 107th Avenue on the side of the street of this construction site based on the imagery you used for this changeset?

Happy Mapping,
Udar.
achauhan_Lyft (2026-01-29 08:27:20+00:00): Hi Udarian,
My name is Amit & I am a mapper in the OSM team at Lyft. I’ve added portions of the sidewalks using Lyft-owned aerial imagery from December 29, 2025 (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1BgBrmJa9Kqm37ilWOHLJdEZ7PNLC-3nL/view?usp=sharing) which you can see in this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177790173/#map=16/25.80774/-80.37119&layers=P &  based on Lyft owned street-level imagery from Dec 11, 2025(https://drive.google.com/file/d/1rJgxN4XwYyHCk8sawK1lk_UODG6krsMV/view?usp=sharing) the remaining areas are still under construction, so I left them unmapped for now.

Let me know if you’d like me to make any other changes—happy to help. Feel free to reach out anytime!

Happy Mapping!
Regards,
Amit
Udarian (2026-01-29 17:16:14+00:00): Thank you so much for the change, this has been really helpful.

Happy mapping,
Udar.
Yog Sot (2026-01-22 18:46:05+00:00): ale rozumiesz, że jesli są substacje, to one nie są na całym obszarze, który był pod nie przeznaczony w mpzp i one są jak faktycznie zostaną utawione, a nie tylko jeśli ktoś ma takie plany?
Ja wiem, że mpzp są fajne, ale OSM to mapa stanu rzeczywistego, a nie ewentualnych możliwości wykonania danych elementów
ALRam (2026-01-22 10:07:39+00:00): Added missing roads according to Mapbox-owned telemetry data and the latest Mapbox Satellite #mapbox_missing_roads
NeisBot (2026-01-22 10:11:21+00:00): Hi Danut Stefan, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 98% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 39 highway(s)
- 1 landuse(s)
- 1 name(s)
- 1 surface(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177557337
woodpeck (2026-01-22 10:57:30+00:00): It appears that you have deleted all the roads in this town and are now re-creating them one by one. Please explain. Are all these streets really named "Drum comunal"?
mueschel (2026-01-27 14:27:12+00:00): Hallo,
"emergency_vehicle" gibt es nicht als Tag. Richtig wäre "emergency".
eggie (2026-01-22 11:30:38+00:00): Dag Thovex,

Hier is wel heel veel geïmporteerd terwijl het nog niet was ingemeten.
In editor iD kun je tegenwoordig de BAG achtergrond kiezen om de woningen uit te lijnen.

MVG
eggie
Kees 59 (2026-01-22 11:32:44+00:00): Hi Thovex

Wanneer access=private wordt gebruikt geldt dat voor alles dus bicycle en foot hoeven, als ze dezelfde waarde hebben, dan niet apart te worden genoemd.
Kees 59 (2026-01-22 11:35:54+00:00): @eggie

Is dat een standaard laag? Ik zie hem bij mij niet staan. Of kan deze worden gekoppeld via de aangepast optie?
eggie (2026-01-22 13:40:35+00:00): Hoi Kees. In josm?
Die heb ik zelf toegevoegd vanuit een van links in de PDOK site.
In iD zit ie dacht ik standaard.
Je kunt ook de BGT omtrekgericht gebruiken. Daar staan ook de gebouwen ingemeten in.
eggie (2026-01-22 13:42:57+00:00): https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/de-beste-imagery-layers-om-nl-osm-te-mappen-met-josm/85393
eggie (2026-01-22 13:45:16+00:00): https://www.pdok.nl/introductie/-/article/kadastrale-kaart
Thovex (2026-01-22 14:03:21+00:00): Hi Eggie, ik zie het idd. Heb een wijziging gedaan van een groot gedeelte om het te alignen met de map van https://www.pdok.nl/introductie/-/article/basisregistratie-grootschalige-topografie-bgt-
eggie (2026-01-22 14:07:05+00:00): 👍
eggie (2026-01-22 15:56:14+00:00): Ahh... buiten Nedeland begonnen met mappen voor HOT maps en nooit de welkomstmail ontvangen... Bij deze alsnog.. Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Nakaner (2026-01-22 13:18:01+00:00): Hallo,

du hast die Packstation in eine Postfiliale umgetaggt (amenity=parcel_locker → amenity=post_office). Die restlichen Tags hast du aber belassen (Name usw.).

Was ist jetzt richtig? Ist aus der Packstation eine normale Filiale/Agentur geworden?

In dem Haus sind zwei Packstationen mit unterschiedlichen Nummern gemappt. Das mag richtig sein, wenn DHL später eine zweite Packstation dazugebaut hat.

Viele Grüße

Michael
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177557465
Funki76744 (2026-01-24 11:48:12+00:00): Hallo Michael, bitte ändern: 1x Packstation (von außen erreichbar) und 1x Poststation (mit Öffnungszeiten die mir unbekannt sind). Danke
rhhs (2026-01-22 10:53:07+00:00): Hi, thanks for your edits! I think the footways you added are sidewalks (pavements)? Then please also add footway=sidewalk tot he sidewalk and adjust the sidewalk= and sidewalk:*:surface= tags on the street where you added the sidewalk. Yuriy Venelin has sidewalks on both sides, so it would be good to add both, not just one of them.
SonoranDesert1 (2026-01-23 17:32:19+00:00): Hi rhhs, thank you for reaching out and providing valuable input regarding sidewalk editing and tagging. I have added footway=sidewalk to the footways, transferred the sidewalk tagging from the main road to the footways, and added sidewalk=seperate to the associated highways. I appreciate your guidance here, and hope you have a nice day!
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-12 11:07:57+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1367379665

shop=cosmetics nie byłoby czasem lepsza?
Nakaner (2026-01-22 13:22:18+00:00): Hallo,

für Paketshops, die als Nebengeschäft eines Ladens dienen, z.B. Kioske mit DHL- und Hermes-Vertretung, gibt es das Post-Partner-Taggingschema. Damit kann man ordentlich modellieren, dass ein Laden ein Kiosk/Schreibwarenladen/Tankstellenshop/… ist und nebenbei für A, B und C Post-/Paketdienstleistungen erbringt.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:post_office

Hier müsstest du folgende Tags ergänzen:

post_office=post_partner

post_office:brand=Hermes PaketShop (getrennt durch Semikola, falls mehrere Marken)

Falls die Öffnungszeiten des Paketschalters abweichen: post_office:opening_hours=*

Weitere Keys siehe Wiki.

Viele Grüße

Michael
Funki76744 (2026-01-24 11:47:04+00:00): Hallo Michael, bitte ändern:  1x Packstation (von außen erreichbar) und 1x Poststation (mit Öffnungszeiten die mir unbekannt sind). Danke
Funki76744 (2026-01-24 11:47:53+00:00): sorry - falsche Einrichtung, vergiss bitte die Angaben von eben!
Piskvor (2026-01-22 14:14:07+00:00): Super, díky za rozšíření mapy!

Ta knihovnička je tedy uvnitř budovy? Čili je přístupná v pracovní době úřadu?

Díky, Piškvor.
Archt (2026-01-24 11:17:24+00:00): Knihovnička je v hale za vstupními dveřmi. Přístupná v pracovní době úřadu a pokbočky české pošty.
❤️‍🔥 (2026-01-22 12:01:34+00:00): thanks for these edits, this is the new trail that's opening next week right?
NeisBot (2026-01-23 06:54:52+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13476176726 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Math tutoring center"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-30 07:09:15+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177876611
(No visible changes after review)
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-22 15:09:51+00:00): Reverted adding Mathnasium SEO spam POI with advertising/malformed tags and source=* of Google Maps, which is not allowed by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ), in changeset 184436658

https://osm.org/changeset/184436658
Supaplex (2026-01-23 10:16:39+00:00): Hi 

Please do not do testing on OpenStreetMap
Just draw something and do not upload to OpenStreetMap
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177559160
Branko Kokanovic (2026-01-23 22:02:42+00:00): I hope we already discussed *not* adding road names in Serbia?

And, c'mon, do you really think there is road named "Nirvana road"? With all other roads being in cyrillic and in serbian language? How old some kid needs to be to fool you this easily?
KarooDesert (2026-01-27 16:36:29+00:00): Hello Branko Kokanovic,Thank you for reaching out. Our team is aware that names should not be altered or added in Serbia, and I sincerely apologize for the oversight in this case. I appreciate you removing the name and will ensure that I do not update name tagging in Serbia again in the future.
eggie (2026-01-22 11:13:08+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Tip   Beperk het gebied van je edits. Doe zoiets in twee uploads. Schuiven met de kaart veroorzaakt vaak schade.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-01-22 11:15:24+00:00): Wanneer je een puntdak ziet komt dat door de schuingenomen luchtfoto. Het is niet de bedoeling dan de gebouwen van punten te voorzien.
eggie (2026-01-22 11:18:27+00:00): Nog een tip.. Geen adressen toevoegen aan gebouwomtrekken. Er zijn adresnodes.
MVG
eggie
melmoes (2026-01-22 11:35:47+00:00): Ah top! Dankje!
eggie (2026-01-22 11:39:53+00:00): Alle begin is moeilijk... Veel plezier met mappen.
eggie
melmoes (2026-01-22 11:47:14+00:00): Bedankt! Komt goed! :D , bedankt voor de tips.
eggie (2026-01-22 11:24:13+00:00): Tip... Alle gebouwen zijn directe ingemeten import vanuit het kadaster. Op grond van schuingenomen luchtfoto's kun je geen gebouwen uitlijnen. 

MVG
eggie
melmoes (2026-01-22 11:38:22+00:00): Ah oke! Dus als dat update update het ook de woning?
eggie (2026-01-22 11:43:02+00:00): Er wordt periodiek geïmporteerd.
Het ligt een beetje aan de BAG importeur.
Soms is nog niet ingemeten. Dan wordt later nogmaals geïmporteerd.
Je kunt ook zelf een verzoek doen om het te versnellen via het forum middels het draadje BAG importverzoeken.
melmoes (2026-01-22 11:46:55+00:00): Mwah, geen ramp als het niet exact dezelfde grote is als het daadwerkelijk is haha
eggie (2026-01-22 11:51:55+00:00): Je kunt in iD als achtergrond de transparant van de BAG kiezen. Dan zie je de ingemeten vorm. Tenminste als die laag bijgewerkt is.
In mijn editor josm is het nog niet bijhewerkt.
Afdakjes staan niet in de bag. Die kun je apart intekenen met building=roof layer=1
thebrad1111 (2026-01-22 14:35:07+00:00): Thanks for adding this
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-23 04:52:08+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Podana kombinacja addr:city + addr:place jest nieprawidłowa.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9645281066
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13473211243

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-23 04:52:09+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Podana kombinacja addr:city + addr:place jest nieprawidłowa.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12504072098
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13300219185
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13373023080
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13435886016

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
keyyushi (2026-01-22 19:18:07+00:00): Merhaba, öncelikle düzenlemeleriniz için teşekkür ederim.

Güncel kavşak, hava görüntüsüne göre yanlış ve karışık gözüküyor. Tekrar kontrol edebilir misiniz?
MBerkcanOguz (2026-01-23 05:58:00+00:00): Merhaba, kavşak tasarımı şu an yenileniyor ve bir kaç güne bitmiş olacak. Bitince nasıl olacağını çizdim, şu ankinden çok farklı ve karmaşık görünümlü bir yapıya geçiş yapacak.
YomanNH (2026-02-03 16:45:08+00:00): Robienie syfu na mapie nie wzmacnia relacji społecznych. Wycofałem zmiany.
Kees 59 (2026-01-22 11:40:16+00:00): accesstags aangepast? slip of the pen?
eggie (2026-01-22 11:45:15+00:00): Ik had net die riedel accesstags aangepast in de brandgang.
.. en wat gebouwen beter gezet. Hier is niks ingemeten. Het zal het vorige commentaar zijn.
Gr eggie
eggie (2026-01-22 11:48:05+00:00): Deze dus https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177560331#map=19/51.598648/4.784425
Frank Peng (2026-01-22 14:44:27+00:00): Please keep changesets to one geographical area. Changesets should not span multiple continents.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
Champi67 (2026-01-22 20:05:45+00:00): Ohh ok, I was not knowing that and for sure was more convenient because of types of changes. I'll keep in mind for next changes
NieWnen (2026-01-23 08:58:45+00:00): Jeśli hydranty są nieużywane/nieaktywne to ten disused nie powinien być usuwany.

To kwestia tego, aby zewnętrzne programy zostały dostosowane pod dane OSM.
GoID_Yukha (2026-01-22 12:02:24+00:00): Also updated the name
NeisBot (2026-01-23 06:48:31+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 26 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1165009218 v1 | 14 crossings
https://osm.org/way/52143280 v8 | 12 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/664390161 v3

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177561538
NeisReview (2026-01-30 07:09:24+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/177614691
EneaSuper (2026-01-22 14:13:36+00:00): Ciao e grazie per il tuo contributo a OSM!

Attenzione però: il tag leisure=garden è errato, andrebbe usato semmai il valore park con ulteriori tag che ne determinano e descrivono l'accessibilità.

Se vuoi chiedo nel gruppo nazionale, va bene? 😊
Il_Marinc (2026-01-22 15:38:33+00:00): Ok va bene. Intanto sostituisco il valore in park.
Il_Marinc (2026-01-22 15:40:42+00:00): Però con il valore park devo aggiungere anche gli orari. Ma non essendo pubblico non ci sono degli orari fissi.
Il_Marinc (2026-01-22 15:41:46+00:00): In attesa di risposta lascio il valore garden
EneaSuper (2026-01-23 14:58:24+00:00): Ciao, allora, mi hanno detto che sì, il valore park è quello corretto.

Si potrebbe anche creare un'area scolastica con tutti i dati necessari che includa edificio, parcheggio e parchetto; ed hai fatto benissimo a usare il tag access=private 😊
Dave Venables (2026-01-22 12:13:17+00:00): Should have referenced note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4982362
Rainero (2026-03-04 17:18:08+00:00): Hallo Zebastian83,

woher hast du diese Hausnummer 15 in der Barer Straße?
Am Gebäude finde ich kein Hausnummernschild und die Stadt München hat diese Hausnummer nicht vergeben.

Servus,
Rainer
Zebastian83 (2026-03-12 20:56:04+00:00): Das kann ich nicht mehr sagen, nimm es gerne raus
Fraxi (2026-01-22 12:22:55+00:00): Извинявайте, но вижте това:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
Може би leisure=pitch е излишен в момента. Прочетете и преценете.
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-23 04:52:16+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13476360964

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀