piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
bxl-forever (2024-12-18 09:50:06+00:00): Hello,
Railway platforms do not have "names". The reference number (1, 2, …) is already stored in the "ref" tag.
AFAIK, all those ref codes are properly set on railway stations in Belgium.
Please do not change railway infrastructure, you are doing it wrong.
ilias_ (2024-12-19 04:06:50+00:00): Bonjour, merci d’utiliser le format +212… pour les numéros de téléphone (voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:phone). Bonne journée!
FroschForscher (2024-12-18 12:38:14+00:00): Hallo ZeitlerBenjamin,
ich habe drei Anmerkungen zu diesem Changeset:
1. Du hast versehentlich den Stuifenweg (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4651535) quer durch mehrere Häuser verlegt. iD warnt vor dem Speichern solcher Änderungen. Diese Warnungen sind i.d.R. gerechtfertigt (wenn auch nicht immer von einem selbst verursacht/behebbar), es ist deshalb gut sich die Warnungen vor dem Speichern einmal genauer anzuschauen.
2. Du hast für den als Verkehrsberuhigten Bereich eingetragenen Safranberg (Straße; https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/766313151) eine Geschwindigkeitsbegrenzung von 5 km/h eingetragen. Sofern hier kein amtliches Schild dafür hängt (mir ist keines bekannt) gilt hier "Schrittgeschwindigkeit" und nicht 5 km/h. Für einen VBB sollte grundsätzlich keine Geschwindigkeitsbegrenzung gesetzt werden. (OT: Wieso ist das letzte Stückchen eine Wohnstraße? Könnte man auch mal korrigieren).
3. "f" ist ein sehr kurzes Kommentar, "maxspeed" z.B.  wäre besser.

Das ist jetzt alles nicht schlimm und lässt sich leicht wieder beheben. Gerade mit wenig Erfahrung können Fehler passieren, ausdehnen man lernen kann.
ProfDrBenji (2024-12-18 13:05:09+00:00): Hallo FroschFoscher,
zu 1. war nicht meine Absicht. Ich werde die Fehler natürlich beheben.

Und wegen der VBB, kannte ich aus der Fahrschule das i.d.R. Schrittgeschwindigkeit 5km/h sind und es bei anderen Karten auch so eingetragen ist. 

Ich bedanke mich für deine Hinweise und werde in Zukunft drauf achten.

LG Benjamin
gscscnd (2024-12-19 11:38:19+00:00): maxweight=1,5, powinno być 1.5
SomeoneElse2 (2025-04-15 23:01:22+00:00): Some of these building values were odd - I changed them in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165005490 .
ruph (2025-04-16 07:41:01+00:00): I appreciate your hint and the correction
eggie (2024-12-18 09:54:00+00:00): Hi   This is wateroverlap on water.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dkitesurfing

Gr eggie
eggie (2024-12-18 09:51:30+00:00): Hi kartenwelten

You are adding an area natural=water on a natural=water. 
That is not correct.


Greetz,
eggie
kartenwelten_dad (2024-12-18 09:59:17+00:00): Hey Eggie,
thanks, which object type is correct in this case?
eggie (2024-12-18 10:03:37+00:00): Hi, 

I think remove natural=water will do.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dkitesurfing
It's already a restricted area. 
Your edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=160342048

The former mapper is an OpenSeaMapper but stopped wit mapping some time ago.
Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2024-12-18 10:08:48+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sport

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=pitch

Otherwise a question at the (Dutch?) OSM forum.
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/nl/43
English is no problem.
kartenwelten_dad (2024-12-18 10:28:42+00:00): Ok, I removed natural=water. So the right tags for OpenSeaMapper will be available. Thanks for the information.
eggie (2024-12-18 10:45:53+00:00): The problem no is that the validator from JOSM tells me faillure..: sport without physicle object. :)
Perhaps leisure=pitch is the best alternative. 
It will not render green in a waterbody. 
Now it will trigger other mappers to fix the problem .. because of the faillure in Josm validation.

The community had no problem with leisure=pitch.
eggie (2024-12-18 10:46:29+00:00): typo  The problem now..
Probelnijs (2024-12-18 09:49:59+00:00): Change set comment did not register correctly; should have been: "Add details around Zwartemeerlaan, Merenwijk"
eggie (2024-12-18 09:57:40+00:00): Hi kartenwelten..

Aber ach nicht natural=water 'on top of' natural=water.
Bitte entferne natural=water. 
Gruss 
eggie
mavl (2025-05-13 15:06:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
impiaaa (2024-12-18 17:54:29+00:00): Thanks for your contribution! Please make sure to use the changeset description to describe what you changed, not just where—for example, "Added the names of buildings at Stanford."
Yog Sot (2024-12-18 12:03:03+00:00): Jak wyznaczasz taki przejazd rowerowy, to wypadało by oznaczyć odpowiednimi tagami i np nie tworzyć dwóch skrzyzowań z jedną jezdnią Solnej na jednym z przejazdów
db-ak (2024-12-18 12:11:49+00:00): Jakich tagów brakuje? DR przecina zarówno południową jak i północną jezdnię, a także koniec lewoskrętu z Marcinkowskiego, tak też i zrobione
Yog Sot (2024-12-18 17:45:09+00:00): zrobiłeś tak:
https://i.imgur.com/N069vXs.png
wejdz teraz i zobacz jak jest po moich zmianach. Dlaczego nie ma drogi rowerowej na środku? no bo nie ma znaku. poznaj się na rowerowym mieście doznań ;]. 
Podobnie rozwiązłem przejście obok, ale zapomniałem ustawić surface na kostkę i osobno asfalt dla przejsc. Możesz sam ustawić i pozmieniać inne przejścia w okolicy jbc. 
Zmieniłem równiez troche geometrie jezdni, bo wytyczne sa takie, że oś drogi powinna być na geometrycznym środku jezdni. To skrzyzowanie ma pare innych problemów, ale sa raczej nierozwiązywalne, bo mapujemy osie dróg, a nie ich pasy ruchu jbc.
db-ak (2024-12-18 17:52:50+00:00): No właśnie wzorowałem się na wcześniejszych wersjach, w tym twojej gdy edytowałem Małe Garbary/ Garbarby i wtedy częsciowo dałeś 'crossing=traffic_signals
cycleway=crossing'
Yog Sot (2024-12-18 19:25:16+00:00): okej, dzieki. Czasami nie wprowadzam wszystkich potrzebnych zmian od razu, bo czasu braknie. To dzielenie linii by dokładnie okreslic miejsce przejazdu/przejścia, to troche overkill, ale przejścia najczęściej są asfaltowe, a ich chodnik z kostki, bardzo często maja wypustki dla niewidomych i te wibracje oraz oznakowane sa zebrą, a przejazdy rowerowe tego wszystkiego nie mają, są zwykle asfaltowe na całej długości drogi rowerowej i są oznakowane kwadracikami, a nie zebrą. 
polskie tłumaczenie przejazdu dla rowerów jet też troszkę nieintuicyjne, bo dosłownie traktowane jest jako 'crossing' - przejście. Więc czasem mam opory by dla przejazdu dawać węzeł, no ale jak jest sygnalizacja świetlna, to sam nie wiem jak nawigacje to traktują. 

W tym konkretnym przypadku jak wprowadzałeś taką małą zmianę, mogłes po prostu ogarnąć te detale. 

Polecam ci też wejść na discorda OSM Polska, tam ludzie bardzo chętnie pomagają i nieczęsto mają inne zdanie od mojego tesz jbc ;)
tux67 (2024-12-18 10:45:09+00:00): Hi Callme112,
ein highway=path mit motor_vehicle=permit ergibt wenig Sinn. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dpath
path ist für nicht motorisierten Verkehr gedacht. 
Wenn du genaue Vor-Ort Kenntnis hast, dann kannst du die Wege, die befahrbar sein sollen z.B. auf highway=service ändern.
Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160342587
tux67 (2024-12-18 13:19:00+00:00): Nochmal Hi, habe gesehen du hast die Wege auf service geändert. 
Kleiner Hinweis - es ist (da wir ja hier in einem Community-Projekt sind) gern gesehen, wenn nach einem Kommentar hier im gleichen Changeset noch eine kurze Bestätigung kommt.
Darüber hinaus hoffe ich, daß die Änderung auf service auch auf alle diese Wege zutrifft (also das vor Ort auch so zu verifizieren ist).

Danke & Gruß
tux67
Callme112 (2024-12-18 13:28:07+00:00): Hi tux67,
zumindest wurde dies mir so vom Leiter der örtlichen Feuerwehr bestätigt und auch der mir vorliegende Feuerwehrplan weist diese als befahrbare Fläche aus.  

Das mit der kurzen Bestätigung versuch ich mir auf die Fahne zu schreiben. 

Grüße,
Jens
tux67 (2024-12-18 13:29:52+00:00): ok, danke ;-)
nevw (2024-12-19 10:43:19+00:00): The multipolygon for the toilet is too complex. Multipolygon rings cannot share sides. Please, make a simple structure or just use a single node.
eggie (2025-11-16 19:35:24+00:00): .. en dus weer een hoop schade..
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=160343196
Inmiddels hersteld
MVG
eggie
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-17 02:16:13+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165051339
mavl (2025-05-13 15:05:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
bdentremont (2025-01-02 01:16:25+00:00): A section of this road was barricaded for permanent removal on 4 December 2024 and has been torn up.  I have again removed this section of road after surveying it on 07 December.
Kaduna (2025-01-03 04:05:45+00:00): Hi bdentremont, Thank you for making the corrections.
wambacher (2024-12-21 14:30:03+00:00): Hier ist nicht der Ostring. Bitte Adresse/PLZ korrigieren.
AntMadeira (2024-12-18 16:06:52+00:00): Olá, RB.
Podes explicar porque trocaste a chave species pela chave taxon nesta árvore? Segundo sei, um táxon pode ser reino, filo, classe, ordem, família, género ou espécie. Se a etiqueta species=* é a mais exata para este caso e tem o valor bem definido, gostaria de perceber o motivo por teres optado por uma etiqueta mais genérica.

Abraço,
António.
Reino Baptista (2024-12-18 16:52:49+00:00): Olá,
Estive hoje a rever e a inserir as várias "Árvores do Ano". Como utilizo sempre taxon, quando sou eu a inserir as árvores pela 1ª vez, devo ter pensado que tinha inserido esta também. Vou já repor.
RB
AntMadeira (2024-12-19 18:50:48+00:00): Calculei que fosse isso, porque também vi a notícia e não sabia que esta árvore (que conheço bem) tinha sido uma das candidatas.
Obrigado por corrigires.

Abraço,
António.
eggie (2024-12-18 12:03:35+00:00): Dag pimpie   Alle info heb ik verplaatst naar de adresnode.  Niet nogmaals een adres toevoegen aan een gebouwomtrek. We hebben al adresnodes.
MVG
eggie
Yog Sot (2024-12-18 16:51:08+00:00): ten znak c-16 gdzie stoi dokładnie w tym momencie?
db-ak (2024-12-18 17:03:09+00:00): Dokładnie za przejściem, jak na nowym GSV: https://www.google.com/maps/@52.4603569,16.9145482,3a,36.6y,231.73h,87.62t/data=!3m8!1e1!3m6!1s_ExrfIEDVc-Pko7DRHy7fA!2e0!5s20241001T000000!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fcb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26pitch%3D2.3836653198408584%26panoid%3D_ExrfIEDVc-Pko7DRHy7fA%26yaw%3D231.73105961999343!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI0MTIxMS4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D
Yog Sot (2024-12-18 19:36:08+00:00): kurła, ale zakamuflowany, dzięki za ten find i edycje, bo jak rok temu robiłem zdjęcia, to przysięgam znaku nie zidentyfikowałem.
mavl (2025-05-13 15:09:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
eggie (2024-12-19 08:23:38+00:00): Dag AvN   Maar emergency=yes is toch gewoon default hier... of bedoel je dat je tegen de eenrichting mag rijden.
oneway:emergency=no ?

MVG
eggie
jeslop (2024-12-18 10:59:29+00:00): Hola infordemanda, gracias por tus contribuciones. Por favor, sé un poco más preciso en las descripciones de los conjuntos de cambios, ayuda a todos los demás usuarios: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenos_comentarios_en_conjuntos_de_cambios

Un saludo,

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
eggie (2024-12-18 11:59:23+00:00): Dag AbN  Waar emergency=yes de access no of conditional zal overrulen lijkt het me correct.
Stukken waar geen accesstags op staan voor motorvoertuigen behoeven geen emergency=yes
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=160345007
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-12-18 11:56:34+00:00): Dag Pimpie.. Je info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode.
Je hoeft niet zelf adressen aan te maken.

MVG
eggie
Fgjgdrou (2024-12-18 11:01:45+00:00): Edit to changeset 159937105.
Hufkratzer (2024-12-20 15:26:11+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1343437448 is not a riding centre (tag leisure=horse_riding), it is an outdoor riding arena and therefore should get the tags leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian, like here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1319576388
Layft Greater (2025-02-03 06:34:01+00:00): awesome job
literan (2024-12-18 17:05:49+00:00): не ошиблись, точно три абсолютно идентичных объекта в разных зданиях?
anastasia_ (2024-12-18 18:43:58+00:00): да, информация от владельца poi, три адреса у них
pitfire (2025-06-14 08:03:14+00:00): Hi Timur Saitov
This is definitely (Konrad-Adenauer-Straße 1a)
permissible data source is https://www.tim-online.nrw.de/tim-online2/
VG pitfire
pitfire (2025-06-14 08:03:24+00:00): Hi Timur Saitov
This is definitely (Konrad-Adenauer-Straße 1a)
permissible data source is https://www.tim-online.nrw.de/tim-online2/
VG pitfire
TrickyFoxy (2024-12-21 15:35:14+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160474019
pitfire (2024-12-20 11:40:42+00:00): Hallo Mark510,

welche Beschilderung hat Dich veranlasst, ein ganzen Straßenzug/ Siedlungsgebiet mit "access=private" zu erfassen. Keine der Vorgaben zu (Key:access=privat) sind hier zutreffend: 
"Public access is not allowed. Access is granted with individual permission only. Examples: A driveway with a no trespassing or keep out sign; A company parking lot for employees only. 

Bitte beachten: Das Schild "Privatweg" bezieht sich in Deutschland in der Regel auf die Straßenunterhaltungspflicht (Öffentliche Hand/Kommune vs. privater Grundstücksbesitzer) und nicht auf das Wegebenutzungsrecht. Prüfe daher genau, ob der Weg wirklich nur eingeschränkt für jedermann zugänglich ist, bevor du das Merkmal verwendest. 

MfG pitfire
Vinber-Pro (2024-12-18 11:32:59+00:00): j'ai raté mon commentaire, mise à jour des attributs aéroclub et école de parachute
David Kříž (2025-01-04 13:58:38+00:00): Toto není běžný kruhový objezd, ale turbo-objezd, na kterém opravdu záleží do kterého pruhu vjedete ještě před ním! Tím že jste pomazal všecny pruhy co jsem tam pracně namaloval a tu moji práci takto rozsekal a vizuálně hezky zjednodušil, jste z toho udělal pro jízdu a navigaci zcela zbytečné čáry. Nevím, jestli jste aktivní řidič a jestli víte jak se na těchto kruhových křižovatkách jezdí, ale asi ne. Když přijede od D1 po silnici 1082 tak MUSÍ ještě před KO vědět kam se zařadí. Po Vaší úpravě to vypadá, že nemusí a rozhodne se až na kruháči, což je hrubý nesmysl. Příště si rozmyslím se s něčím takto hrát hodinu, když přijde někdo, kdo to beze slova diskuse smaže a namaluje si hezké ale zcela nefunkční a zbytečné jednoduché kolečko.  Kdybyste aspoň napsal, mohli jsme si to vyjasnit a probrat, takto to zavání arogancí.
aceman444 (2025-01-04 23:53:52+00:00): Napisal som Vam vo viacerych sadach zmien a na ziadnu ste nereagovali, takze ak tvrdite, ze "bez slova diskuze" tak klamete. Okrem toho som prepojenia medzi jazdnymi pruhmi zakreslil, len ich mozno nevidite.
Vasich 8 paralelnych jazdnych pruhov urcite nebolo spravne, takze sa netvarte, ze to po Vasich upravach bolo nejako vhodne na navigovanie.

Na navigaciu autom pouzivam vylucne OSM, takze sa snazim dosiahnut, aby znacenie bolo spravne. Samozrejme zalezi od aplikacie, ake znacenie uz podporuje. Ale vymyslat ci ciary a oddelene cesty preto, aby (ktovie ktora) navigacia fungovala podla zelania nie je v OSM spravna cesta.

Aroganciou zavani akurat Vase spravanie, ked zacinate s OSM, nemate nastudovane ako sa znacia jazdne pruhy a hned idete "vylepsovat" dolezite krizovatky v roznych statoch.
eggie (2024-12-18 11:50:16+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-18 18:54:37+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12430539583/history has fixme = yes that was added in this edit
What requires fixing here? fixme=yes is not particularly clear, and maybe problem got fixed since then?
Hopla57 (2026-01-04 19:50:05+00:00): Hi,
I don't know anymore, so I added some more information and deleted `fixme`.
d3mol3k (2024-12-18 12:35:00+00:00): Nie dodaje się maxspeed na pałę bo na tej obwodnicy sa miejsca z ograniczeniami do 70 i 50 km/h dla wszystkich a takze podaje sie maxspeed dla innych pojazdow: hgv/bus/trailer. Przy drodze stoja znaki z ograniczeniami a takze znaki poczatku i konca terenu zabudowanego.
eggie (2024-12-18 12:06:42+00:00): Dag Jb   Beter niet schuiven met de kaart in editmodus. Je kunt zoiets in twee aparte uploads doen.
Schuiven geeft vaak schade aan de kaart.

MVG
eggie
Jb8743 (2024-12-18 13:15:23+00:00): Dag eggie,

Bedankt voor de tip!
pavvv (2024-12-18 13:19:05+00:00): Będziesz obniżać DK39?
Mxdanger (2025-01-10 00:45:14+00:00): Hi, when adding the change:lanes, it would be recommended to split the existing way to maintain the routes.

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=-117.30466&lat=33.09804&zoom=17&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.51&overlays=ptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes
Swihail (2025-01-10 05:33:49+00:00): Hi Mxdanger, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyse the situation and come back to you.
Swihail (2025-01-13 13:22:35+00:00): Hi Mxdanger. I have verified my edits, and noticed that indeed - relation got broken, despite the fact I used the partitioning tool ("P") by selecting a node in JOSM, split is done and ideally it shouldn't break any existing relations. I will be checking this while mapping in the future, and I have made the necessary corrections for this relation. I did a quick check on my other similar edits and observed no such issues.
Mxdanger (2025-01-14 05:47:13+00:00): Thank you for checking and fixing it! I appreciate it.
Swihail (2025-01-16 10:09:53+00:00): Thank you!
marc__marc (2025-12-09 00:25:18+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12430611699
il y a un problème avec cette station :
la description décrit une adresse qui est loin de là https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_foot&route=48.530002%2C2.010013%3B48.5342498%2C2.0095961#map=17/48.532152/2.009962

Par ailleurs si tu veux ajouter l'adresse, je pense que object:street serrait plus utilisable que description

la valeur de network me semble aussi douteuse, cela me semble être au mieux Wattpark

Je m'attendais à la trouver sur le parking de France Travail à la rue indiquée mais pas vu, je vais aller voir leur application

Cordialement,
Marc
marc__marc (2025-12-09 00:56:26+00:00): J'ai trouvé la bonne position sur l'application et j'ai déplacé l'objet osm.
malheureusement leur app ne donne aucune information sur la puissance ni le nombre par type de prise
j'ai converti description en object:*
tykayn (2025-12-09 14:15:00+00:00): ah super merci,
oui des fois la position est vraiment très éloignée des données ouvertes, j'ai vu jusqu'à 800 mètres de décalage v_v

thanks!
canfe (2025-03-22 08:59:10+00:00): Tolto charge perché con tariffa non formattata come da wiki.
Sarebbe meglio poi identificare tutta l'area come "Da Maurizio" anziché ripeterlo per vari oggetti.
Javierpf (2024-12-18 12:48:33+00:00): i and thank you for contributing :-). Your changeset crosses many continents/countries. 
Please for the future retain your changeset smaller (local). Let reviewers and other mappers check your edit more easily. It's impossible (almost) to keep track of the database and changes if changes in huge areas.
So I kindly ask you when you edit, retain your changeset in a particular smaller area -such as countries/towns- save it first and then move to another area. Examples:
you are adding/modifying 10 objects in 2 distant cities => make 2 changesets, 1 per city.
you are adding/modifying 5 objects in 5 countries => make 5 changesets, 1 per country.
Why? Have a look at this wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
Gangadi Anusha (2024-12-18 18:09:45+00:00): Thank you for the valuable feedback. Please feel free to point out similar suggestions in future as well. Regards, Anusha Gangadi
HellMap (2025-03-28 15:07:41+00:00): Čau, 

Priekš ceļiem `proposed`  (`planned`/`construction`/utt.) liek kā pamata tega vērtību - `highway=proposed` (`highway=construction` utt.). Pats par sevi `proposed` nevar būt, bet tas var paskaidrot plānoto vērtību ceļam - piem. `highway=proposed` + `proposed=residential`. (Var arī likt `proposed:highway=residential`, bet ceļiem parasti liek pa taisno.)
bigbug21 (2024-12-18 22:32:03+00:00): Not all works have been finished on December 14th. Numerous tracks were/are still closed.
BetzeJoni (2024-12-18 23:33:50+00:00): @bigbug21 this may be correct, but the two gaps which I closed are definitely used since sunday. Without them there could exist no train between Mannheim and Frankfurt as it were only two small bridges, 10 meter in length, but both tracks.
Muhmaker (2024-12-19 09:14:18+00:00): Hello BetzeJoni. But your changes were not technically correct. You deleted the bridges instead of changing their properties. I have therefore undone your changes. I have also made the bridges passable as you intended. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160379762
Muhmaker (2024-12-19 09:19:28+00:00): I would be interested to know how you found the sections that were still closed
BetzeJoni (2024-12-19 09:23:54+00:00): Thank you very much Muhmaker!

If you mean how I knew that this small parts were not made passable yet:
I tried to map a train route on brouter from RM to FF but couldnt use the Riedbahn so I knew that there had to be at least one gap
bigbug21 (2024-12-21 20:29:12+00:00): @Muhmaker: Some tracks were clearly closed (red Sh 2 markers, lineside signals crossed out), some further tracks were not used by regional trains to be overtaken by ICE trains and were withold on previous stations).
MarkoŠatrak (2024-12-19 13:34:45+00:00): Reverted because of unnecessary split as restriction in reality continues further east #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160395307
marc__marc (2025-03-23 22:55:17+00:00): Bonjour,
Belib' est la marque commerciale, l'opérateur est TotalEnergies :)
Cordialement,
Marc
aTarom (2024-12-19 09:43:58+00:00): Hi, it seems there has been a problem with the translations "name:xx=(((GL)))èisa de Santa Eulàlia", can you please check it?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/259905280/history
Cheers
VictorIE (2024-12-19 04:16:16+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/330293984/history

Should this still be highway=secondary ?
b-unicycling (2024-12-19 21:47:29+00:00): I guess you or someone else fixed it already. Sorry!
tux67 (2024-12-19 06:11:41+00:00): Hallo DahmenAn,

du hattest "Review requested" angefragt bei diesem Changeset.
Wenn die Positionen so der Realität besser entsprechen, ist alles ok.

Gruß
tux67
AndyB_66 (2024-12-18 14:00:46+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Dimitar155 (2024-12-18 14:40:19+00:00): Thank you for your addition! In the future please follow the local guide for naming streets - name is in Cyrillic and it doesn't include "ulica", "ul." or any variation except for "бул." if the road is a boulevard.

Happy Holidays,
Dimitar
KarooDesert (2024-12-20 20:24:20+00:00): Hello there, 

Thank you for the update regarding the guidance towards naming policies for roadways and I will take this information into consideration for the future. 

Thanks again and happy mapping!
AndyB_66 (2024-12-18 14:00:39+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
AndyB_66 (2024-12-18 13:57:13+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments