piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
aixbrick (2026-01-31 12:55:25+00:00): Der Gehweg folgt im Wesentlichen dem Straßenverlauf, die wenigen Parkbuchten sind keine echte bauliche Trennung, denn auch hier kann die Straße überquert werden, wenn dort kein Auto parkt oder die Lücke groß genug ist.
Zitat aus dem Wiki: "Vielerorts hat sich längst eine der Methoden vor der anderen etabliert. Vorzugsweise werden regionale Gepflogenheiten fortgeführt." => heißt: Da die meisten Straßen hier mit sidewalk-Tags erfasst sind, ergibt es keinen Sinn, das für wenige Straßen nun anders zu machen. Dadurch entsteht ein Flickenteppich.
Flusssvie (2026-01-31 14:58:18+00:00): Dann mache ich die Änderungen nachher rückgängig
aixbrick (2026-01-31 20:27:13+00:00): Danke
Flusssvie (2026-01-31 20:36:53+00:00): Danke dir fürs darauf aufmerksam machen
MassCartog (2026-01-31 17:29:12+00:00): Hi welcome to OSM, using Google and Apple Maps is not allowed. If you got this info from those sources, this data needs to be removed from OSM. But it sounds like you live there, so just note, those are not allowed/copy right sources.
sashacoo1 (2026-01-31 17:32:54+00:00): Yes I live here. I’m the one who got these streets on Apple Maps and Google Maps. I was merely stating that these are other map tools that have confirmed my address and street using my data
MassCartog (2026-01-31 18:37:56+00:00): Okay that's fine! Just wanted to be careful not to use any of their data for OpenStreetMap. If people think your source is copyrighted data they will revert your changes.
silversurfer83 (2026-01-31 19:31:25+00:00): Moin

du hast darum gebeten, dass sich das jemand ansieht. Ich hab jetzt nicht jeden einzelnen node kontrolliert, gehe aber davon aus, dass du das gemacht hast.

Was ich auf dem Luftbild im Vergleich mit OSM sehe sieht aber soweit gut aus. Passt also.

happy mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177910402
onterof (2026-01-31 19:38:12+00:00): Da das doch recht viele waren, wollte ich nur sicher gehen, dass nicht irgendwas falsch ist. Danke!
NeisBot (2026-01-31 07:31:49+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13513497358 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Chiropractic clinic"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-08 09:28:18+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178257657
(Cleaned up leftovers from previous edits)
Haritron (2026-01-31 00:39:30+00:00): I meant to say Updated parking polygon tags near Jalan Pangeran Diponegoro #adt
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-04 17:33:13+00:00): Hello!

You used
building=hotel_building
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/524472356/history

Have you maybe meant
building=hotel
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
ika-chan! (2026-01-31 04:39:53+00:00): Hello, you can actually make multiple changes in a single changeset. For example, one changeset can contain different kinds of ancient features like tiled floors and pipelines.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177911808
dima monsky (2026-01-31 11:20:33+00:00): Thank You are helping me, i am newbie much like a blind kitten, learning osm) Somehow catched what You are mean. It can also Edit not singular tag but jointed! possible - very smart very nice
rezemika (2026-02-05 19:47:09+00:00): Bonjour, il y a un problème sur ce changeset : vous avez transformé le polygone d'un quartier en une zone de sport (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/280756083). Pourriez-vous corrigez ça svp ? :)
MraCT (2026-02-06 01:21:27+00:00): Hello, cette modification est accidentelle. J'ai procédé à la modification des attributs. J'espère que le problème est réglé, je suis débutant. Salutations :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177911896
rezemika (2026-02-06 21:34:25+00:00): Hey, il n'y a pas de soucis ça arrive à tout le monde. ^^

Merci de la réactivité, c'est tout bon ! Et bienvenue sur OSM ! :)
NeisBot (2026-01-31 07:31:51+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/176171380 v4

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Camping furniture store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-08 09:31:14+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178257805
(Restore previous tags)
NeisBot (2026-01-31 07:31:52+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/3461235030 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Furniture store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-08 09:31:15+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178257806
(Restore previous tags)
eastcobbmapper (2026-06-14 14:17:38+00:00): Thanks for the major cleanup in this area. I noticed many buildings have addr:housenumber and addr:street, but not addr:city, addr:state, or addr:postcode. Nominatim resolves “Shadowlawn Road, Cobb County, GA” but not “Shadowlawn Road, Marietta, GA,” which seems to affect delivery geocoding. Is there a preferred local convention before I add addr:city=Marietta and addr:postcode=30067 to nearby addresses?
shinterro (2026-06-14 15:45:45+00:00): Hello!
I am unaware of any preferred local conventions, nor do I have a ready dataset of zip code boundaries available to help designate `addr:city` (hence why I'm pretty inconsistent with adding full address blocks - perhaps it is time I look into that.🙂🤔). 

In any case, please add if you have more context, it would be a welcome inclusion.
Warin61 (2026-02-01 00:41:42+00:00): Hi,
Way 1472871922 building is wrong... 
Basics? A way cannot share a segment with itself. See
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=149.14459&lat=-35.26987&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

The inner dome is a 'building part' even if it is retractable. So it should be included in the building footprint. 

I have corrected this. I hope you can use this as a guide.
Tommybara (2026-02-05 09:25:41+00:00): Bạn có thể giải thích rõ hơn về sửa đổi này đang làm gì được không?
felipeeugenio (2026-02-01 13:29:33+00:00): Hola. Con la letra Q se te "cuadra" el edificio. Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177913862
rarad74 (2026-01-31 07:48:38+00:00): Salut. Daca nu stiai, Mapbox imagery sunt cele mai recente pentru Bucuresti. De anul trecut. Sunt mai recente decat ESRi Standard sau Mapbox.
pwbriggs (2026-02-01 22:58:32+00:00): Thanks for the edits. Here's a non-exhaustive review of some things I see.

* Looks like you have bus:lanes:backward=designated|yes in some places where I think it's bus:lanes:backward=yes|designated. *:lanes:backward=* tags are tabulated from the perspective of traveling in the backwards direction on that road. So if a road has 2 lanes per direction and the curb lanes are both bus lanes, it would be bus:lanes:*=yes|designated for both.

* I think this should have access:lanes=* as well. That's the "only" in "Bus Only". So in addition to bus:lanes:backward=yes|designated I think there should be access:lanes:backward=yes|no to indicate that general traffic isn't allowed in that lane. Or maybe it's implied, but I'm not sure.

* is bicycle=designated really the case for both directions in places where e.g. cycleway:left=no?

* Sometimes when approaching an intersection, the bus lane changes to a right turn lane. Not sure if there's any of these south of MLK, but I've represented those as turn:lanes:forward=|right with turn:bus:lanes:forward=| and turn:bicycle:lanes:forward=| based on the signs which read something like "Right turn only, except buses and bicycles".

Yeah, I enjoy lane tagging, but it can be super tedious sometimes. Thanks for working on this!

iD is kind of a pain for doing lane tagging, in my experience. Maybe this is an opportunity to try out JOSM ;)

https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Styles/Lane_and_Road_Attributes has some quirks but it's the best visualizer I've found.

Well, thanks! Let me know if you have any questions. I think iD suggests it in the sidebar after submitting a changeset, but if you're not on the OSM US Slack (hard to say from a basic search), I've found that to be a super helpful place to ask questions and discuss (especially #tagging channel): https://slack.openstreetmap.us/

Happy mapping!
S_Akash (2026-02-21 07:26:19+00:00): Thanks for reviewing! I have fixed points #1 and #3: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178845889.

I couldn't find any documentation on whether "access:lanes" would be necessary or redundant here, so have left as is.

And re: #4, yes there are right turn lanes along the way, which I didn't realize were to be mapped separately. I will add if I get a chance to survey the area again.

Thanks again!
bartgron (2026-01-31 15:00:03+00:00): Zestaw zmian wycofany:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177929102
Nie są to drogi czwartorzędne, co najwyżej można dać highway = residential, czyli drogi mieszkalne
Chieftl (2026-03-26 08:18:58+00:00): Перестаньте видаляти тег wheelchair, він дуже важливий для вказання доступності об'єктів!
Getpin_Com (2026-03-27 15:32:32+00:00): Теги повернули. Розуміємо важливість цих тегів та інших тегів, тому врахували це в наших правках і в майбутньому вже видаляти не будемо
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-01-31 08:30:22+00:00): Thanks!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-02-01 12:44:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 177962210 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes that the local community have confirmed as fantasy.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19735
rempshaener (2026-02-01 09:00:07+00:00): Hallo,
falls du mit „Tor als Punkt“ ausdrücken wolltest, barrier müssten als Node erfasst werden: Nachdem ich einen Mitmapper einmal darauf hingewiesen habe, dass das nicht richtig, mindestens aber nicht schön wäre, wies er mich darauf hin, dass es aber genau so im Wiki beschrieben sei. Zumindest dann, wenn es mit der Straße verbunden ist, was es vor meiner Änderung nicht war.
Viele Grüße
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-02-01 12:44:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 177962210 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes that the local community have confirmed as fantasy.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19735
Leo Slager (2026-01-31 11:35:13+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
rempshaener (2026-02-01 12:23:11+00:00): Hallo,
eine Anmerkung zu den Wasserleitungen:
- Die Erfassung von unterirdischen Leitungen ist ein nicht ganz einfaches Thema, das auch schon öfters diskutiert wurde, zuletzt z. B. hier in einem vergleichbaren Fall: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/erfassung-unterirdischer-leitungen-hier-wasserleitungen-fur-einen-hydrantenplan/133749.
Die Tendenz geht schon sehr deutlich in die Richtung, dass die Erfassung unterirdischer Leitungen eher unterbleiben sollte.
Ich rate grundsätzlich zum Löschen.
- usage=penstock passt hier nicht
- waterway=pressurised ist mindestens fragwürdig
Viele Grüße
gablerto (2026-02-01 17:07:00+00:00): Hallo.
Ich habe die Karte mit den Durchmessern und Leitungsverläufen vom Versorger. Es geht gar nicht darum wo die Leitung genau läuft, sondern das ich bei einem Brandeinsatz sofort sehe ob ich an einer Stichleitung oder an einer Ringleitung hänge.
Gruss, Tobias
rempshaener (2026-02-01 17:28:12+00:00): Hallo,
das macht es nicht wirklich besser.
Bei OSM wird nur erfasst, was jedermann nachvollziehen kann.
Spätestens dann, wenn die Daten von Dritten kommen, ist das nicht mehr möglich.
Außerdem der Hinweis auf https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Import/Guidelines und https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct.
Bereits die ungeprüfte Übernahme von Hydrantendaten ist nicht ohne Weiteres gewünscht.
D. h. mindestens die Wasserleitung sollte wieder entfernt werden.
Viele Grüße
dp7 (2026-02-16 11:46:09+00:00): Ciao Gian Marco, con questo changeset credo tu abbia interrotto la relazione che definisce il "sentiero E1", che ora risulta spezzato in questa tratta:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9075394#map=12/41.9679/13.3934
Puoi verificare ? 
Grazie
Gian Marco T (2026-02-16 13:29:00+00:00): Ciao, guarda non ero a conoscenza dell' esistenza del sentiero E1, ma ti posso dire con certezza che di lì non c'è alcun sentiero. Posso dirtelo con certezza, perchè poco tempo ha ho provato ad imboccarlo in bicicletta ma non c'era traccia di alcun sentiero purtroppo.
Gian Marco T (2026-02-16 13:29:09+00:00): ora verifico comunque.
Gian Marco T (2026-02-16 13:38:34+00:00): se dai uno sgruardo anche tu, vedrai una traccia verde piu' chiara dove prima era segnato un percorso. E' semplicemente una linea elettrica, per cui è stato disboscata una striscia di bosco molto lunga. Dalla strada Simbruina non c'è modo di accedere al sentiero, perciò ho eliminato la traccia. Sul posto, si può osservare un interruzione del guard rail, ma non c'è traccia alcuna di sentieri. https://www.google.it/maps/@41.9619135,13.3809497,3a,75y,304.13h,60.74t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sq3WMRYxFew9u9ReqsnleNA!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fcb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26pitch%3D29.256042370621877%26panoid%3Dq3WMRYxFew9u9ReqsnleNA%26yaw%3D304.1252381305667!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI2MDIxMS4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D
dp7 (2026-02-16 13:45:02+00:00): Grazie per le verifiche. E' probabile che la traccia originaria sia stata disegnata molti anni fa, magari a tavolino, e che quindi in quel punto ci sia un errore. Bisognerebbe verificare sul posto per vedere se ci sono percorsi alternativi, magari segnalati con i cartelli segnavia, in modo da poter correggere. Se sei della zona e hai modo di poter fare un giro... ben venga ! 😉
Gian Marco T (2026-02-16 15:04:30+00:00): Ti scrivo in privato, mi sono sorti alcuni dubbi circa tutta la faccenda del sentiero europeo E1, almeno nel tratto in questione.
QuiLe (2026-01-31 18:09:48+00:00): Hi and thanks for your contributions! It looks like this Flock node might be in a building, can you please check and make sure that this is placed correctly?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177918474
QuiLe (2026-01-31 18:10:00+00:00): Hi and thanks for your contributions! It looks like this Flock node might be in a building, can you please check and make sure that this is placed correctly?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177918474
QuiLe (2026-01-31 18:09:53+00:00): Hi and thanks for your contributions! It looks like this Flock node might be in a building, can you please check and make sure that this is placed correctly?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177918482
Wanderer2000 (2026-01-31 21:40:11+00:00): Hoi Taurus, is er een reden dat je de bushaltes tagt met public_transport=station? public_transport=platform lijkt mij beter passen.
Wanderer2000 (2026-02-09 15:13:56+00:00): https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=178316657

Helaas geen reactie. Ik heb de bushaltes omgezet naar public_transport=platform.
Taurus3 (2026-02-09 16:49:44+00:00): Excuus Wanderer, was erg druk. Dank!!
user_5359 (2026-02-01 08:52:56+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Du hast die Öffnungszeiten der Apotheke geändert, aber den Wert check_date:opening_hours nicht angepasst. Warum?
aretaon (2026-02-01 13:33:48+00:00): Hallo, die Änderung der Öffnungszeiten erfolgte über den Änderungsdialog von CoMaps, mit war nicht bewusst, dass der Check-Zeitpunkt nicht angepasst wird (siehe https://codeberg.org/comaps/comaps/pulls/3119).
user_5359 (2026-02-01 13:41:29+00:00): Danke für das Nachsehen bei den Request. Leider kommt es öfters vor, das Applikationen die Gepflogenheiten nicht ganz berücksichtigen.
NeisBot (2026-02-01 06:58:02+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13514020035 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Dentistry office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-08 09:31:17+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178257807
(Cleaned up leftovers from previous edits)
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-22 08:29:11+00:00): Cleaned up remaining SEO spam and other tagging for POI in changeset 184420626

https://osm.org/changeset/184420626
Fraxi (2026-01-31 18:45:54+00:00): Здравейте!
Моля, не добавяйте адреса на блока като име(name). Достатъчен е addr:housenumber в случая.
mueschel (2026-02-06 11:11:12+00:00): Hi,
are these actually 'natural = ridge' and not 'natural = cliff'?
NeisBot (2026-02-01 06:56:23+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 54 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1472907874 v2 | 20 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1472910444 v2 | 8 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1472910445 v2 | 6 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177920700
NeisReview (2026-02-08 09:28:19+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/178175011
WaffleR_zero (2026-01-31 12:22:44+00:00): Hello and thank you for the contributions,

If the POI is no longer found on the ground then it should be deleted. And also, the operational_status tag is deprecated so you shouldn't use this tag.

I already deleted this POI here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177923578

If the POI is still found on the ground then you should use opening_hours=closed or disused:*
kapazao (2026-02-03 09:18:59+00:00): Hola, por favor revisa el etiquetado de rotondas (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:junction=roundabout).

Si no tienen nombre propio se les pone noname=yes y no se les pone el nombre de las vías que conectan a esta.

Un saludo
Penegal (2026-02-03 17:59:53+00:00): Bonjour.

J’ai remarqué que, par ce groupe de modifications, vous avez ajouté des destinations routières en majuscules. Attention : si les panneaux routiers affichent souvent les destinations en majuscule, l’attribut `destination=*` ne doit pas être rempli tout en majuscules, mais avec la casse telle qu’elle serait normalement utilisée par écrit. Vous pouvez trouver des exemples [ici](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:destination) et [là](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:highway%3Dmotorway_junction#Exemples).

Pour information, [un défi MapRoulette](https://maproulette.org/browse/challenges/53024) est en cours pour corriger ces erreurs.
Jamroar (2026-02-03 19:34:55+00:00): Bonsoir Penegal,
Merci pour ta remarque, je n'avais pas connaissance de cette règle. 
Je modifierai cela dès ma prochaine session pour remettre cela au propre 😉
mcliquid (2026-02-01 12:21:15+00:00): Hello Franamberes, thank you for your edits with iD.

A quick note about this changeset: although the comment “Modificación vías Teruel–Castellón” suggests a local edit in Spain, the changeset actually contains edits spread over a very large area — from Poland to Spain. Changesets that cover such distant locations are difficult for other mappers to review, understand, or selectively revert if needed.

For future edits, please consider:

* keeping each changeset focused on one local area or region,
* uploading your changes before moving on to a different country,
* making sure the changeset comment accurately reflects the actual scope of the edits.

You can find more information about this here:
[https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets)

Thanks for your understanding, and happy mapping!
YomanNH (2026-02-02 11:30:09+00:00): Które "przystanki , ścieżki , drogi,laski" dodałeś/edytowałeś/usunąłeś?
Tatfahren (2026-01-31 12:02:23+00:00): Ist das jetzt auch eine unüberspringbare Fehlermeldung wie angeblich "fehlende beschreibende Eigenschaften", oder kann man die Meldung ignorieren und trotzdem hochladen?
BrummsLee (2026-01-31 16:33:59+00:00): Ich weiß nicht so recht, wie du das meinst.
Kann man trotzdem hochladen....
Es war wieder einer der Konflikte von iD mit dem Namen "Bücherzelle".
ID hat da wieder gemeckert, daß die Bücherbox den "verdächtigen Namen Bücherzelle" hätte und ich solle den entfernen. Da der Name aber so an der Zelle dran steht, habe ich ihn in iD erst einmal weggelassen, um meinen Zähler für "ignorierte Warnungen" auf hdyc.neis-one.org nicht noch mehr zu strapazieren.
Hab den Namen dann mit JOSM ergänzt, da wird wenigstens nicht gemeckert... 🙂
NeisBot (2026-02-01 06:58:04+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13514129094 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Dentistry practice"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-02-08 09:31:17+00:00): 🗑️ Element deleted by https://osm.org/changeset/178140407