piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2023-03-16 12:16:52+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.

You are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.

We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. Just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.

Tag buildings as building=yes. Nothing more, no names.

Please map each building accurate over the rooflines and squared(rectangular only).


Don't connect nodes to other buildings or features.

The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 

Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.

See also this document:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/11PsAW0bzUZHbS8YnbaFzqOYhJY7tSPYG/view?usp=share_link


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133744473
Frans S (2023-03-16 12:17:08+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.

You are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.

We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. Just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.

Tag buildings as building=yes. Nothing more, no names.

Please map each building accurate over the rooflines and squared(rectangular only).


Don't connect nodes to other buildings or features.

The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 

Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.

See also this document:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/11PsAW0bzUZHbS8YnbaFzqOYhJY7tSPYG/view?usp=share_link


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133744473
Frans S (2023-03-16 12:17:10+00:00): About highway tagging:

Please apply the rules described in this wiki
Most common taggings.
Rural areas : Unclassified,  track , path, service
Urban areas: unclassified, residential, path.


https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highways

Read also the remarks about tagging of tracks in the instructions.
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133744473
Shaun das Schaf (2023-03-16 21:37:37+00:00): Hallo Gittaca,

"amenity=bench" reicht vollkommen aus. Ich glaube nicht, dass diese Bänke mit Namen "Benches" heißen. Ich habe die Namen wieder entfernt.

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=133766358

Viele Grüße
Shaun das Schaf
SomeoneElse (2023-03-17 17:41:24+00:00): Hello,
It might be helpful, given the recent schmozzle, to use a few more words in changeset descriptions, here perhaps "changed 3 highway=pedestrian to highway=footway, because that is the better description of what these are".
Best Regards,
Andy
wille (2023-03-17 18:32:04+00:00): I'll do that. Thanks for the suggestion!
Frans S (2023-03-19 09:02:25+00:00): About highway tagging:

Please apply the rules described in this wiki
Most common taggings.
Rural areas : Unclassified,  track , path, service
Urban areas: unclassified, residential, path.


https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highways

Read also the remarks about tagging of tracks in the instructions.
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133744754
Frans S (2023-03-19 09:02:37+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.

You are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.

We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

In iDeditor, zoom in so far that the hidden objects are visible.(blue note on bottom line warns about hidden objects)
Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. Just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.

Tag buildings as building=yes. Nothing more, no names.

Please map each building accurate over the rooflines and squared(rectangular only).


Don't connect nodes to other buildings or features.

The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 

Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.

See also this document:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/11PsAW0bzUZHbS8YnbaFzqOYhJY7tSPYG/view?usp=share_link


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133744754
snoozingnewt (2023-03-28 02:31:55+00:00): Why are you moving the boundary?
samrat02 (2023-12-07 06:02:17+00:00): due to u unclear imaginery
snoozingnewt (2024-01-21 03:24:38+00:00): Why would imagery have anything to do with administrative boundaries, which are not visible on the ground?
Allison P (2023-03-19 04:43:10+00:00): And yet the building=house tag was not removed.
swimdb (2023-03-19 13:02:30+00:00): Thanks, fixed that.
Frans S (2023-03-16 12:42:04+00:00): Hello.  
On this webpage you will see the changes I had to make to get your mappings modified.
Please improve your mapping skills.
Best regards
Drahtochse (2023-04-11 14:03:19+00:00): Hi wies1!
Kannst du mir sagen, wie es zum tracktype=grade4 kommt? Der Weg ist seit Jahren unverändert in exzellentem Zustand.
Gruß Drahtochse
wies1 (2023-04-11 15:31:46+00:00): Hallo,
da du den Weg als excellent beschreibst, passt Grade 4 in der Tat nicht - habe es soeben in Grade 2 zurück geändert. Hier gab es eine Fehlermeldung im JOSM Validator.
Gruss
wies1
Drahtochse (2023-04-11 15:46:43+00:00): Achso, das macht Sinn. Die Kombination mit surface=ground war ungünstig. Ich habe das mal weiter angepasst (Changeset 134780428)
Danke für die schnelle Reaktion!
Drahtochse
pitfire (2023-03-16 12:50:51+00:00): Hallo Bolt007,
willkommen bei OSM. 
was bedeutet als Änderungsbeschreibung (zzz) ?
Warum ist der Weg für Fussgänger gesperrt?
Für weitere Bearbeitungen einige Infos: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Erfasse_keine_Vorschriften.2C_die_nicht_durch_Gegenst.C3.A4nde_vor_Ort_repr.C3.A4sentiert_werden
Bolt007 (2023-03-16 13:56:30+00:00): Hi pitfire,

I mistakenly submitted the changeset.
Thank you for your comment!

I'll roll back the change immediately.
Bolt007 (2023-03-16 13:57:35+00:00): Oh, I see that you rolled back the change. Thanks!

Note that the node was previously marked as foot:yes.

https://aleung.github.io/osm-visual-history/#/node/6562639995
pitfire (2023-03-16 14:34:38+00:00): Thanks for your cooperation
mavl (2023-03-24 10:29:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 134051515, 134045911, 134058112 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible source - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6981].
DaveF (2023-03-18 13:22:36+00:00): FYI There's already a Hove railway Station.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1322286515
wille (2023-03-16 13:05:50+00:00): O nome da estação do Bike Salvador no site está como Praça do Fórum Rui Barbosa (https://bikeitau.com.br/salvador/). Você cometeu o mesmo erro novamente ao modificar a tag para estação de metrô. Outros edifícios que você adicionou como roof, são apenas saídas de ventilação da estação (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=819957768619059&focus=photo) e outros que você colocou como stop area na relação do metrô estão errados (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:public_transport%3Dstop_area ).
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133746756
volredman (2023-03-16 13:50:00+00:00): obrigado pelos detalhes mais o nome até na prefeitura está como Campo do Pólvora ! Informando que o centro Ramiro de Azevedo estpá localizado no Campo da Pólvora - https://comunicacao.salvador.ba.gov.br/centro-de-saude-campo-da-polvora/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133746756
volredman (2023-03-16 13:51:25+00:00): Outro site informativo Saiba detalhes de túnel subterrâneo que a prefeitura de Salvador quer construir entre o Campo da Pólvora e o Comércio diz que a estação está localizada no Campo da Pólvora! Praça do Forum tenho certeza que está errado !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133746756
volredman (2023-03-16 13:54:06+00:00): Outra referencia https://www.trbn.com.br/materia/I78390/salvador-tera-tunel-subterraneo-que-liga-campo-da-polvora-ao-comercio informa que o local se chama Campo da Pólvora! O local está com o nome errado !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133746756
volredman (2023-03-16 13:57:38+00:00): " A Prefeitura de Salvador planeja construir um túnel subterrâneo de 825 metros exclusivo para pedestres do Campo da Pólvora, em Nazaré, ao Taboão, no Comércio. https://www.ibahia.com/salvador/salvador-planeja-tunel-subterraneo-de-800-metros-para-acesso-exclusivo-de-pedestres " O nome do local correto é Largo Campo da Pólvora!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133746756
wille (2023-03-16 13:58:45+00:00): Sua alteração no nome da praça foi correta, só faltou manter Praça do Fórum Rui Barbosa na tag alt_name. Porém a mudança no nome da estação do Bike Salvador foi errada.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133746756
volredman (2023-03-16 14:13:02+00:00): Obrigado ! Essa questão da alt_name vou entender com o tempo ! mais o nome da Estação da Bike Salvador está errada no site do Itáu. Todos os sites fazem referencia do local como Campo da Pólvora. coloquei alguns links entre vários na pesquisa como exemplo https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bike_Salvador e https://www.ibahia.com/salvador/oito-novas-estacoes-do-salvador-vai-de-bike-serao-instaladas entre outros. Pode pesquisa !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133746756
wille (2023-03-16 14:17:07+00:00): Essa notícia é de 2014. Às vezes, eles mudam os nomes e a localização das estações. Essa é a empresa que administra o sistema. Nenhuma outra fonte é mais confiável que ela.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133746756
volredman (2023-03-16 14:25:59+00:00): passei por lá na última terça ! Se você for no local vai vê que as Bike Salvador está atrás da Banca e do lado da estação do metro dentro do Largo do Campo da Polvora!  Como você disse é preciso colocar o nome correto !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133746756
volredman (2023-03-16 14:36:35+00:00): a Notícia não mudou a realidade dos fatos! Tive lá tem 3 dias!  A praça do Fórum foi desfeita e virou estacionamento depois da construção da estação do Metrô no Largo do Campo da Pólvora! Eram dois local separados por um canteiro com grades! O campo da Pólvora era um campo de futebol que ficava ao lado da praça do Fórum e que com a construção do Estádio da Fonte Nova, em 1951, foi desfeito e virou Largo do Campo da Pólvora e mais recentemente foi construído no local a estação do Metrô!  https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Esta%C3%A7%C3%A3o_Campo_da_P%C3%B3lvora
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133746756
wille (2023-03-16 14:45:09+00:00): Como eu falei, o nome da praça está correto como você colocou, mas isso não significa que a estação de bike vai ter o mesmo nome. Quem define o nome da estação é a empresa que administra e não há nenhuma obrigação da estação se chamar Campo da Pólvora. A estação do bike salvador pode ter absolutamente qualquer nome.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133746756
volredman (2023-03-16 14:48:59+00:00): Entendi ! Vale o que está no site da empresa operadora!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133746756
Frans S (2023-03-19 12:00:27+00:00): Important. Keep yourself to the required objects to map. No landuse taggings, please.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133746913
Frans S (2023-03-19 12:00:38+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.

You are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.

We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

In iDeditor, zoom in so far that the hidden objects are visible.(blue note on bottom line warns about hidden objects)
Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. Just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.

Tag buildings as building=yes. Nothing more, no names.

Please map each building accurate over the rooflines and squared(rectangular only).


Don't connect nodes to other buildings or features.

The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 

Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.

See also this document:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/11PsAW0bzUZHbS8YnbaFzqOYhJY7tSPYG/view?usp=share_link


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133746913
ouioui738 (2023-03-16 19:13:30+00:00): Sainte Genieve ou sainte Geneviève ?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133746980
Frans S (2023-03-19 16:47:07+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.

You are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.

We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

In iDeditor, zoom in so far that the hidden objects are visible.(blue note on bottom line warns about hidden objects)
Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. Just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.

Tag buildings as building=yes. Nothing more, no names.

Please map each building accurate over the rooflines and squared(rectangular only).


Don't connect nodes to other buildings or features.

The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 

Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.

See also this document:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/11PsAW0bzUZHbS8YnbaFzqOYhJY7tSPYG/view?usp=share_link


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133747908
rskedgell (2023-03-16 14:51:11+00:00): Hi, and thanks for editing OSM.

Unfortunately, the "trunk road" you mapped is a main railway line.

It is fairly unlikely that the many active mappers in London would have missed the presence of a trunk road until now.

REverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133752553
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-16 15:37:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133754728 where the changeset comment is: Revert some new-user misunderstandings in London
Frans S (2023-03-22 10:02:00+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.

You are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.

We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

In iDeditor, zoom in so far that the hidden objects are visible.(blue note on bottom line warns about hidden objects)
Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. Just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.

Tag buildings as building=yes. Nothing more, no names.

Please map each building accurate over the rooflines and squared(rectangular only).


Don't connect nodes to other buildings or features.

The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 

Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.

See also this document:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/11PsAW0bzUZHbS8YnbaFzqOYhJY7tSPYG/view?usp=share_link


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133748035
Frans S (2023-03-21 17:29:17+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.

You are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.

We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

In iDeditor, zoom in so far that the hidden objects are visible.(blue note on bottom line warns about hidden objects)
Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. Just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.

Tag buildings as building=yes. Nothing more, no names.

Please map each building accurate over the rooflines and squared(rectangular only).


Don't connect nodes to other buildings or features.

The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 

Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.

See also this document:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/11PsAW0bzUZHbS8YnbaFzqOYhJY7tSPYG/view?usp=share_link


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133748070
rskedgell (2023-03-16 14:53:41+00:00): Hi, and thanks for editing OSM.

Unfortunately, the "trunk road" you mapped is a main railway line.

It is fairly unlikely that the many active mappers in London would have missed the presence of a trunk road until now.

Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133752723
BCNorwich (2023-03-16 15:25:39+00:00): Hi  rskedgell,
The person is doing it again, I'm not local. Could you make more reverts and perhaps put a report to the DWG.
Regards Bernard.
rskedgell (2023-03-16 15:29:02+00:00): Hi BCNorwich,

Thanks, I just noticed and am about to revert them. Profile reported to DWG for vandalism (or at least a level of negligence where the distinction between the two is unimportant).
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-16 15:36:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133754728 where the changeset comment is: Revert some new-user misunderstandings in London
Frans S (2023-03-19 09:07:06+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.

You are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.

We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

In iDeditor, zoom in so far that the hidden objects are visible.(blue note on bottom line warns about hidden objects)
Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. Just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.

Tag buildings as building=yes. Nothing more, no names.

Please map each building accurate over the rooflines and squared(rectangular only).


Don't connect nodes to other buildings or features.

The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 

Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.

See also this document:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/11PsAW0bzUZHbS8YnbaFzqOYhJY7tSPYG/view?usp=share_link


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133748092
OPENER next (2023-08-11 14:21:33+00:00): Die aktualisierten DHIDs scheinen nicht korrekt zu sein. Jedenfalls stimmen sie nicht mehr mit dem ZHV überein. Zudem haben jetzt beide Plattformen/Masten die selbe DHID (de:14511:30238:0:BN)
geo_VMS (2023-08-14 07:42:08+00:00): Hallo, danke für den Hinweis zur selben Nummer - habe ich korrigiert. Bzgl. ZHV hatte ich bereits Th. Gr. und R. Ap. mitgeteilt, dass dort nicht die aktuellsten Daten vorliegen. Ich werde mal Analyse veranlassen, warum die Daten nicht aktualisiert wurden. Also auch danke für den Hinweis. Und nochmal der Verweis auf aktuellste Daten: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:VMS_GmbH/Datenbereitstellung.
Frans S (2023-03-22 12:37:56+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
Please don't map landuse objects like farmland, orchards etc.
These are not a part of the project.
When you map them anyhow, you often introduce errors, like connecting nodes to other features, overlapping object, which has to be corrected by a validator.
In general, projects mapped with task manager is not the place to map these. You are limited to a single task.
A landuse object often covers bigger areas. 
Mapping of these objects are to be done by other (local) mappers outside TM.
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133748568
SomeoneElse (2023-03-21 12:34:37+00:00): Hello,
"fixing value to follow convention tagging schema" doesn't explain what you did or why you did it here.  See https://osm.mapki.com/history/relation/7226121 .
Another mapper has changed boundary=region to boundary=administrative; you then change the admin_level.  Did you discuss your edit with the local OSM community and are they happy that the new hierarchy of admin levels in this area is correct?
Best Regards,
Andy
FajrAl (2026-07-07 11:47:03+00:00): Indonesia has no admin_level=3

https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2sUg

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/penataan-kesalahan-tag-admin-level-3-di-indonesia/145162
Frans S (2023-03-18 09:20:29+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
A question. Why did you re-tag a correct tagged road (unclassified) into residential? This is not an urban area (village, Town.)
About highway tagging:

Please apply the rules described in this wiki
Most common taggings.
Rural areas : Unclassified,  track , path, service
Urban areas: unclassified, residential, path.


https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highways

Read also the remarks about tagging of tracks in the instructions.
Best regards and keep mapping
marczoutendijk (2024-04-20 06:58:02+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/575974229
opening_hours=24h/24h???
Do you mean 24h/7

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
mueschel (2023-03-17 17:57:19+00:00): Please explain what these nodes are. I very much doubt that there are ~50 spots to recycle tyres operated by YouthMappers...
JJIglesias (2023-03-18 04:27:56+00:00): They are not following the Wiki instructions. But meanwhile this "bogus" data is inside  the UMSA premises, it will not affect the map overall.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Drecycling
SekeRob (2023-03-16 13:26:49+00:00): OK, this corrects the non-render state both broken farmland MPs were in. Converted to simple polygon.
DaveF (2023-03-18 13:32:34+00:00):  	Hi
When creating platforms as polygons could you please add 'area=yes' tag.
This is required to render railway=platforms as infilled grey.
That it currently renders infilled without it is a bug in OSM-carto's data & will be fixed.
mueschel (2023-03-30 10:12:31+00:00): Hi,
what does "  bicycle_parking_locker = casier" mean? This tag isn't used in other places.
plnew (2023-03-30 14:33:11+00:00): Hello,
thank you for the remark, 
I have corrected it.
ivanbranco (2023-03-16 13:55:59+00:00): Hi Allouche,

you added both natural=wood and landuse=residential (as way and relation) to the same area. It doesn't make much sense to me.