piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Supaplex (2026-06-17 06:37:33+00:00): Hi skyNavi

This is Dennis Chen from the Data Working Group. OpenStreetMap project follow the on the ground truth, which sometimes conflict with the official point of view from some government authorities. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ground_truth

Here is a list of disputed territories list by OpenStreetMap community, and you can view the current status of Taiwan:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Disputed_territories

Don't change current de facto status by your own government view, which will be viewed as vandalism by Data Working Group

Dennis Raylin Chen
Data Working Group, OpenStreetMap Foundation
data@osmfoundation.org
[Ticket#2026061710000097]
Supaplex (2026-06-17 06:38:49+00:00): Automatic translation by Google Translate:

您好 skyNavi

我是Data Working Group的 Dennis Chen。OpenStreetMap 项目遵循实地情况，这有时会与某些政府机构的官方观点相冲突。

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ground_truth

以下是 OpenStreetMap 社区整理的争议地区列表，您可以查看台湾的当前状态：

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Disputed_territories

请勿根据您所在政府的观点更改当前的实际状态，否则数据工作组将视此为破坏行为。

Dennis Raylin Chen

Data Working Group，OpenStreetMap 基金会
data@osmfoundation.org
[Ticket#2026061710000097]
Jordi MF (2026-03-24 17:37:06+00:00): Esta cuenta se tata de una multicuenta creada para evitar bloqueos:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/usuarios-editando-en-espana-bajo-sospecha-vandalismo-malas-practicas-y-otros/2510/144

Usuario recientemente bloqueado: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Repasus/blocks
Wildsharky (2026-03-25 10:16:34+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:180396117
SuborbitalPigeon (2026-04-11 12:03:52+00:00): Please don't do this
parukhin (2026-05-02 07:51:59+00:00): Здравствуйте, верните, пожалуйста, теги зданий, которые удалили в этой правке и возможно в других
NasuFoito (2026-05-03 16:46:52+00:00): Здравствуйте, добавила свои теги, откатив свой пакет
bartgron (2026-03-24 14:39:37+00:00): Wszystkie zestawy zmian związane z tym obiektem zostały wycofane. Proszę o zapoznanie się z https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/chce-dodac-swoja-firme-do-mapy-w-osm-watek-ogolny/135487 przed dodaniem swojej firmy.
Pozdrawiam
grzegorz75jan (2026-03-24 17:20:20+00:00): Profil proszę zmienić z tego czegoś https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/%C4%84cki%20pomoc%20Drogowa na pasujący do OSM lub usunąć te cuda z profilu by został pusty.
lunar accoutrement (2026-04-20 04:51:26+00:00): Hi, I believe with this edit you added 395~ instances of 'denotation=avenuehttps://www.mobilitaetsforum.bund.de/shareddocs/downloads/de/projekte/22040_aladin_schlussbericht.pdf?__blob=publicationfile&v=2' which makes the URL appear as a suggestion when placing tree nodes.

If this was a mistake could you please take a look into fixing it?

For example, check out this node: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13674177470
doppel-b (2026-04-21 19:16:32+00:00): Hi, thank you for pointing the error out, I must have accidentally pasted the URL into the denotation value before copying and pasting the tree node.
I fixed all instances of the wrong denotation in changeset/181642223.
lunar accoutrement (2026-04-21 22:56:25+00:00): Thanks!
ajmat (2026-03-25 08:38:45+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: 180394337
Riteshpatil7 (2026-03-24 10:52:12+00:00): ok
NeisBot (2026-03-24 10:54:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13674208042 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "One-bedroom apartment"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-04-01 16:33:05+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/180347596
A67-A67 (2026-03-24 13:23:35+00:00): Why would this be a spam name? I've reverted this change.
Edman92 (2026-03-25 12:20:57+00:00): Dear A67-A67,
I apologize for the mistake. The name I removed was really fine. It was my carelessness.
I truly appreciate your correction, and valuable feedback.
I truly regret any inconvenience this may have caused.
Best regards,
Edman92.
A67-A67 (2026-03-24 13:17:57+00:00): Niet alle suggesties van de iD-editor zijn echte fouten. Zo wordt SPAR in Nederland met hoofdletters geschreven en is de frachisenemer onderdeel van de naam. Dit speelt bij meerdere winkelketens.

Het is dus altijd belangrijk om de suggesties te controleren en niet automatisch te accepteren. Het zijn suggesties, geen foutmeldingen.
totera (2026-03-24 21:22:32+00:00): Hi, I've told you this before, but I'll say it again: please stop merging the shop nodes on the building ways. It's a topological error; the shop is inside the building, not on the edge.
dzamper (2026-03-24 11:33:39+00:00): To jest ciąg pieszo-rowerowy więc raczej highway=path jeśli już?
Bezi_ (2026-03-24 14:02:18+00:00): Racja, już koryguję
dzamper (2026-03-24 14:51:46+00:00): Super, dziękuję 🙂
JakovRajić (2026-03-27 11:18:00+00:00): Forgot to add hgv:conditional tag, added in changeset/180497226
eggie (2026-03-24 12:28:33+00:00): Dag rhoving,
Het adres is niet compleet.. plaatsnaam?
Er is een adresnode... daar kun je ook op bijtaggen.
Mvg
eggie
rhoving (2026-03-24 12:57:43+00:00): Thanks. Had ik blijkbaar over het hoofd gezien. Ik heb het aangepast.
eggie (2026-03-24 13:11:16+00:00): 👍
Sven50981103 (2026-06-13 06:33:43+00:00): Beide Anlagen sind noch nicht in Betrieb. Präfix construction gesetzt
Linus W Frische (2026-04-19 18:04:56+00:00): Hej. Hvorfor er det en pipeline?
osmviborg (2026-04-19 18:13:00+00:00): En culvert kan ikke være så lang https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tunnel=culvert?uselang=en
osmviborg (2026-04-19 18:14:49+00:00): Denne kan også bruges https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tunnel%3Dflooded
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-05-28 05:34:58+00:00): dodawanie tego do granic administracyjnych wydaje mi się błędne, zbędne i wadliwe - nie powinno tam się jako elementów losowych statystyk wrzucać

mogę ten pomysł na szerszym forum przedyskutować
NeisBot (2026-03-24 11:46:13+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your changesets and noticed that the cumulative count of your recent edits (7 changesets) shows that 307 of your last 348 changes were deletions. This is quite an unusual proportion, so I wanted to check with you.

Could you please confirm whether these deletions were intentional or if they may have occurred by mistake?

#DeletionsCheck #Cumulative
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?uid=23971593
NeisBot (2026-03-24 11:54:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13674354779 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Marketing agency office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-01 16:33:09+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180731113
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
iandees (2026-03-24 12:54:51+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7883670582 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180352947, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
Colbertson (2026-03-24 14:54:22+00:00): šie vārti bija ielikti krustojumā
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9384162911/history/2
World_Winner (2026-03-26 04:16:01+00:00): Revert of 180345823
Kovoschiz (2026-03-25 07:44:18+00:00): Why did you remove `highway=` and change to `playground=` ? This breaks routing.
Dundee930 (2026-03-25 11:36:09+00:00): reverted
ajmat (2026-03-25 12:38:26+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: 180405660
perusluku (2026-03-24 12:22:40+00:00): I guess I created topological error to Asema-aukio multipolygon, but reverting wasn't succesfull and I can't locate the error. Trying to fix this later
kingkingHK (2026-03-24 14:14:46+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/800207987 is clearly not `layer=-1`...
Kovoschiz (2026-03-25 07:40:57+00:00): 1. Technically `layer=` can have no meaning, but it better be consistent and expected. To not have jumps, or random changes and splits. 
2. At least, only `building:levels=`+ `building:min_level=` is necessary. `layer=` is complicating it, as those are still simple numbers, while it may be argued as simplification, and different purpose of rendering, or ordering.
Wildsharky (2026-03-25 10:17:56+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:180397592
NeisBot (2026-03-24 12:39:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/11772930850 v4

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Tattoo studio"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-01 16:33:12+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180731116
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
World_Winner (2026-03-26 04:18:11+00:00): Partially Revert of 180334810
Jordi MF (2026-03-24 17:37:42+00:00): Esta cuenta se tata de una multicuenta creada para evitar bloqueos:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/usuarios-editando-en-espana-bajo-sospecha-vandalismo-malas-practicas-y-otros/2510/144

Usuario recientemente bloqueado: @Repasus/blocks
osmmapper222 (2026-03-29 18:57:21+00:00): Mit dem Changeset wurde die Baustelle am Herrenhäuser Markt entfernt und bereits abgerissene Gebäude (aus dem ALKIS?) wieder eingefügt.

Die DOP20-Luftbilder und https://archive.ph/5RtlM zeigen, dass bis auf die zwei Fachwerkhäuser alle Gebäude abgerissen wurden.

Ich habe die Baustelle wiederhergestellt und den Status der Hausumringe angepasst ;)
NeisBot (2026-03-24 13:24:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 64 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/618573641 v1 | 22 crossings
https://osm.org/way/618561406 v4 | 21 crossings
https://osm.org/way/618561405 v4 | 21 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/5846486314 v4

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180353945
iandees (2026-03-24 13:28:25+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11296562506 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180354363, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
schobbish (2026-04-01 00:04:16+00:00): Further reverted in changeset 180696673. I could not verify the changes you made to the Mosaic Dallas building.
NeisBot (2026-03-24 13:24:41+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 19 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/967243717 v10 | 9 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1492218071 v1 | 3 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1492218070 v1 | 3 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/1382405366 v5
https://osm.org/node/6725213789 v2
https://osm.org/node/1382405575 v3

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180353952
NeisReview (2026-04-01 16:33:25+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/180354731
https://osm.org/changeset/180421806
Ambush (2026-03-24 17:00:31+00:00): Majority of the changeset looks like random building polygons placement in a clear field. At the same time, many of buildings are not marked in the area.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180354712
Ambush (2026-03-24 17:12:01+00:00): My comment wsa wrong because OSMCha uses outdated imagery. On ESRI it looks fine.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180354712
Sally Mlingi (2026-03-25 04:44:15+00:00): Thank you for the feedback. Indeed I was using Esri Imagery.
Ambush (2026-03-25 12:07:51+00:00): Thank you for your commitment!
NeisBot (2026-03-24 13:39:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 9 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1492221378 v1 | 5 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/13674605823 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180354731
domi_id (2026-03-28 11:19:51+00:00): What are these 2.2 levels "pillars"? Also I believe two of those have unintended comment attached to them, something about checking and additional fixes for old tasks ;)
JJ_P (2026-03-28 11:32:29+00:00): This has been corrected, thank you!
eggie (2026-03-24 14:36:28+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback   Je info heb ik samengevoegd met de adresnode. Het gebouw heb ik hersteld. Svp niet naar de daken kijken en dan een gebouw opnieuw intekenen. Dat klopt niet.
Je hebt een guest_house toegevoegd. Wat bedoel je daarmee en heeft dat een naam? 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-03-24 14:42:57+00:00): guest_house zonder naam en verder gegevens verwijderd.
ika-chan! (2026-03-24 18:00:49+00:00): As I stated at https://osm.org/changeset/178472281, please do not remove roads just because they are not accessible to the public: instead, you can realign the road and add access=private to block routers from using the road in navigation.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180355248
Frank Peng (2026-06-11 02:30:11+00:00): It's good practice to modify the geometry of existant map objects instead of deleting them and remapping them anew. This helps preserve their editing history on OSM. I can see from here that you deleted an existing road and remapped it anew. In the future, please make sure to modify the geometry of existing map objects instead of deleting them and remapping them anew. For more information, please refer to this OSM Wiki article: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180355268
IvanaŠokčević (2026-03-25 11:41:05+00:00): Unnecessary split at the intersection with Benton Boulevard, as it is also tagged hgv=no; merged back in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180403081 #OptimoRoute
Taya_S (2026-03-25 12:18:56+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180404966
Dave Venables (2026-03-24 14:06:24+00:00): Change set description should have been "American Candy Kingdom looks closed"
Wildsharky (2026-03-25 10:17:21+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:180396456
eggie (2026-03-24 14:49:55+00:00): Dag Albert,
Vaak is het handiger om verdwenen paden eerst als disused:highway=path te taggen. Je hebt anders kans dat een medemapper ze weer intekent. Ze zijn immers te zien in de transparant van de BGT omtrekgericht.
MVG
eggie
Albert V (2026-03-24 20:05:33+00:00): Dank je, BGT kende ik nog niet. Ik zie daar inderdaad paden die ik heb verwijderd en ook die ik toegevoegd.
VLD192 (2026-03-26 15:26:52+00:00): Hello,
I am reaching out in regards to some of the edits in this changeset. While I understand the thought behind the edits, the consolidation of the footway and cycleways seems to cause some confusion and is a regression of data (see ways 1352425140 and 385650099 for example). The existing paint indicates that the cycleway and pedestrian footways are separate lanes and should be treated independently. It seems that updating the tagging on the ways would be more beneficial than consolidating them. Just looking for some further explanation. Thanks.  Casey (VLD192)
NeisBot (2026-03-24 14:24:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13674737174 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Design firm office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-01 16:33:15+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180731119
(Delete spam tags. First version)
JakovRajić (2026-03-27 11:23:50+00:00): Missed a couple of signs, tags adjusted in changeset/180497470
MihaelIvanjek (2026-03-26 17:29:15+00:00): Accidentally omitted measurement units added in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180444013 #OptimoRoute
NeisBot (2026-03-24 14:36:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13674738063 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Design build firm"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-01 16:33:18+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180731123
(Delete spam tags. First version)
vasagavavv (2026-03-24 14:55:45+00:00): Добавил озеленение дворов, парков и скверов, которое знаю лично и смог разглядеть со спутника
jnighan (2026-03-24 14:43:02+00:00): Improve natural area mapping; JOSM validation cleanup.

Sorry, accidentally uploaded without comment
iandees (2026-03-24 15:01:44+00:00): Hello! I noticed that nodes https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9221755761, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9377175935 were moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180358883, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
bartgron (2026-03-24 20:28:38+00:00): Droga została przywrócona. Nie usuwamy dróg, które istnieją w rzeczywistości. Do drogi na terenie prywatnym należy dodać tag access=private, co uczyniłem.
Pozdrawiam
Taya_S (2026-03-24 16:16:29+00:00): Is this GSF Car Parts sharing a location with Sun Trade Windows?
swinetown (2026-03-24 19:25:37+00:00): It's not, this shoddy AI edit put it in the wrong unit.
Robert Whittaker (2026-03-25 15:20:26+00:00): Can you check the location of the node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13674845202 that you added in this changeset please?

It's currently positioned in the middle of a road. I doubt a real car parts shop would be located here.

Out of interest, how did you set the position here? Aerial imagery is clear that it's in the middle of a road here, so did you get the coordinates from some other source and then not check the imagery/map before placing it?
Taya_S (2026-03-24 16:14:26+00:00): You appear to have added a duplicate GSF Car Parts here
Robert Whittaker (2026-03-25 14:37:11+00:00): Can you check the location of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13674861101 that you added in this changeset? From the address given, I assume that it should be somewhere around https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=53.273776&mlon=-1.452631#map=18/53.273777/-1.452631 rather than in the middle of a roundabout. Thanks!
silversurfer83 (2026-03-24 20:43:47+00:00): Moin Stefan,

das kann ich nicht ganz nachvollziehen. Woher nimmst du an dieser Stelle einen Berggipfel? 

Das Flurstück etwas südlich, welches einen Teil des Waldes abdeckt, ist "Große Rothenberg" laut ALKIS. Ich kann aber in keiner der drei im Editor hinterlegten Karten eine ele=207 erkennen noch sehe ich dort oder auch im LAGIS einen natural=peak.

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180359787
Stefan Haeder (2026-03-25 08:22:27+00:00): Hallo Silversurfer83,
die Höheangabe und die Bezeichnung „Rothen-Berg“ lässt sich der amtlichen topographischen Karte aus dem Jahr 1900 entnehmen, die bei LAGIS Hessen unter https://www.lagis-hessen.de/maps/topografische-karten/ abrufbar ist. Damals war die Bebauung noch nicht so weit fortgeschritten und auf den Karten war Platz für solche Angaben. In der Natur sind die Höhen nördlich des Geilebachs auch heute noch als deutliche Abstufung erkennbar. Offenbar wurde ursprünglich der gesamte Höhenzug nördlich des Geilebachs als Rothenberg bezeichnet, da auch die Höhe, auf der das Marienkrankenhaus steht, so bezeichnet wird. Nordwestlich des Krankenhauses ist in der alten Karte noch die Bezeichnung „Kleiner Rothen-Berg“ verzeichnet. 
Viele Grüße 
Stefan