piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mvexel (2023-09-08 02:27:09+00:00): I agree that it is generally in very good shape and thank you for being a great steward of our shared OSM data! 

I don't think 2100 S should be primary, I agree it's an important E-W corridor but it just doesn't have the significance or road layout a primary should have in my opinion. Also, it's not a state maintained road—of course this is not the primary criterion but I do see it as a supporting reason. For example 700 E north of 400 S is also not state maintained but I would not consider downgrading it for that reason alone. 

Regarding 300 W / Beck Street - do you think it should be secondary rather than primary? I think I could live with that, the traffic volume is not that high in spite of its generous layout. It's still US-89 but its heyday is long behind us.

Related, I can't really decide where to have the cutoff between primary and secondary on the northern end of Redwood Rd, right now it's 700 N but I don't know where else would be better cutoff point.

Finally, are you keeping an eye on Bangerter? There's still a lot of upgrading going on but I have a feeling people keep changing parts of it from trunk to primary to motorway.. I haven't been paying attention since I'm not in that area very often, but it's worth keeping an eye on. Looking at it right now, I see it's motorway all the way up to 47th South. At least it's consistent, in the past it has been a patchwork of different classes.

Thanks for the discussion, enjoying it.
Oregonian3 (2023-09-08 17:49:49+00:00): One place I differ from others is that I put absolutely zero thought into who maintains a road when I look at classification: I see it as totally irrelevant. Naturally the state-maintained roads are usually more important, but the average person has no idea and doesn't care at all.

And that's why it seems like people keep re-upgrading Beck to primary: they see it as a US route and thus should be primary. And I see that as completely flawed logic that goes against everything OpenStreetMap strives to be: it's not the best route between the two locations at all. I'll re-downgrade it to secondary and I'll leave a hidden note about how the fact that it's a US route should have no bearing on its status. I really wish they'd take out a car lane in each direction and add some nice bike infrastructure there; like you said it doesn't need 3 lanes in each direction for the traffic it gets.

As for 2100 S, you're probably right. I-80 is definitely the more important through route in the area. The reason I had it as primary before is that there's a clear hierarchy of roads in the Sugar House area (1300 E and 2100 S, then 900 E and Highland, then Wilmington and Sugarmont, then all other local roads), and having these be represented by primary/secondary/tertiary/unclassified would be nice. But the current system certainly isn't egregious.

With respect to Redwood, I've wondered that as well. I hate having primary stubs like that, but I don't see another good solution. I could see the argument for making 600/700 N primary, but there's near-term plans to road diet it to one lane in each direction and at that point it certainly wouldn't merit primary classification. I could also live with just downgrading all of Redwood north of I-80 to secondary, but I see the current system as working fine as well. I'd certainly disagree with upgrading all of Redwood to primary; it's not a through route anyone would use with I-215 right there. As for Bangerter, I'm never in that area either so really have no idea what it's like in reality right now :)
Langlaeufer (2023-09-04 17:40:09+00:00): Hi, das sieht mir doch alles etwas merkwürdig aus. Angeblich eine mit Gras bewachsener Feldweg (nicht von dir) der eine Einbahnstraße ist?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140815104
Langlaeufer (2023-09-04 17:58:21+00:00): Hi, oz42 - vielleicht kannst du mir ja mal helfen das zu reparieren.
Ist der Weg wirklich öffentlich? Was für eine Oberfläche?
oz42 (2023-09-06 08:28:01+00:00): Es handelt sich um eine Straße, die mit feinem Split befestigt ist. Ein Durchfahrt verboten Schild deutet auf eine Einbahnstraße - von Privatweg steht dort nichts.
Langlaeufer (2023-09-06 08:39:31+00:00): Du meinst Einfahrt verboten?  Vorsicht, es gibt auch unechte Einbahnstraßen (wenn auf der anderen Seite kein blaues Zeichen mit Pfeil steht) , wo man lediglich von einer Seite nicht Einfahren aber jederzeit wenden darf.
Langlaeufer (2023-09-06 08:42:54+00:00): Ist de gesamte Köppkenweg auf die Art befestigt oder ist der mittlere Teil anders?
Jan Olieslagers (2023-09-05 09:12:50+00:00): Thanks for your efforts! Unfortunately, they are a bit out of place, in fact we already have a fair description of the aerodrome in wwww.openstreetmap.org/node/11167473342
I intend therefore to re-remove your well-meant addition, we try to avoid having double information in our database.
bxl-forever_repair (2023-09-04 21:17:04+00:00): I must inform you that your edit has been reverted.

Please make sure to only add relevant information to OSM.  There are not as many "viewpoints" or "tourism attractions" as people commonly believe, and when there are, names applied on the map should only be the official ones.

Tip: you may use the "description" key to provide additional—and factual—information instead of a name.

Have a nice day.
Pablo Strubell (2024-08-29 07:49:02+00:00): Thanks for you information. Will try to do better next time.
arjunaraoc (2024-01-11 01:03:48+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140815750
jpennycook (2023-09-04 17:39:40+00:00): Should be Overton, not Oakley
Jayden26 (2023-09-04 17:19:33+00:00): This is probably NOT the final product, as it hasn't been built yet. Please review this as soon as possible to verify is this is right.
Jayden26 (2023-09-04 17:20:22+00:00): Is it OK to to look at footage from 511GA.org for verification?
rskedgell (2023-09-04 18:17:19+00:00): I wonder how many of the other 700+ edits made by that user are real and have OSM-compatible sources?
bxl-forever_repair (2023-09-04 20:14:03+00:00): Very true.  This is worth investigating.
map per (2023-09-04 20:16:51+00:00): @bxl-forever: I thing you should tell Pablo Strubell that you reverted his edit and why misusing tourism=attraction and name is not good.
Firefishy (2023-09-04 20:14:11+00:00): Awesome. Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Thank you helping improve the map in PE.
M!dgard (2023-09-05 17:36:35+00:00): Beste, gelieve niet de name-tag te vervangen door name:be, om volgende redenen:

1) Er moet sowieso een name-tag blijven staan, in Nederlandstalig gebied heeft die Nederlandstalige naam.

2) be is de taalcode voor Wit-Russisch. "Wetteren" is niet de Wit-Russische naam van Wetteren.

---

Bedankt voor het updaten van het bevolkingsaantal en de updates aan de POI's.

---

Openingsuren worden liefst genoteerd in de standaardsyntax die beschreven staat op https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours. Zo kan software automatisch tonen of een zaak momenteel open of gesloten is.

Groeten en veel mapplezier gewenst, M!dgard
vlonderpad (2023-09-05 18:34:46+00:00): "be is de taalcode voor Wit-Russisch"?

Ok ivm openingsuren.
M!dgard (2023-09-05 20:03:00+00:00): In deze wijzigingenset schrapte u name=Wetteren en voegde in de plaats name:be=Wetteren toe. De "be" daarin is een taalcode, om meertalige namen uit te drukken. Zo hebben we op Brussel (https://osm.org/node/1635651356) onder andere name:nl=Brussel, name:fr=Bruxelles, en name:be=Брусель (Brussel in het Wit-Russisch). En ook "name=Bruxelles - Brussel" met de naam in de officiële talen van dat gebied. (Veel) meer informatie vind je op https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multilingual_names . Laat gerust iets weten als het nog niet duidelijk is.
abdurrezzak3500 (2025-03-01 20:01:41+00:00): merhaba, imralı'nın mudanya'ya bağlı olduğuyla ilgili bir kaynak belirtebilir misiniz acaba? çok güvenilir olmamakla beraber daha çok karacabey ilçesine bağlı olarak gözüküyor. kaynak kısmına "çeşitli kaynaklar" olarak belirtmişsiniz.
klik (2023-09-07 06:13:52+00:00): Hallo Copymaster,
Du hast an der Straße "Auf der Lache" auf ganzer länge einen Gehweg hinzugefügt. der Gehweg ist aber nur auf dem Teilstück das in "West-Ost" Richtung verläuft vorhanden, das Stück, das in "Süd-Nord" Richtung verläuft hat aber keinen Gehweg.
Copymaster86 (2023-09-07 17:17:06+00:00): ok, ich habe es geändert
DressyPear4 (2023-09-05 10:34:18+00:00): Olá, geralmente mapa de prefeitura não está de acordo com o osm, dê uma olhada em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brazil/Classifica%C3%A7%C3%A3o_das_rodovias_do_Brasil
Discuta com a comunidade local (grupo telegram) antes de alterar a classificação das vias.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140817655
eggie (2023-09-04 18:41:40+00:00): Volgens mij zijn hier al adresnodes. 
Die hoef je niet nogmaals toe te voegen. 

MVG
eggie
joebucks76 (2023-09-05 12:33:04+00:00): I think the outer perimeter of the "Relation: Lake Mead full-water area (8527067)" needs adjusting to better match real world data. I dont know where the data could be found but I do think this is useful data.
https://www.nps.gov/lake/learn/nature/storage-capacity-of-lake-mead.htm
This page has some info on levels.
Full Pool Operational Capacity 1,219.0 ft. In the 80's and 90's it did crest above 1200 ft.
I did use Google Earth and 36.3071,-114.4217 is at 1228 ft so this should not be intermediate water (under water) according to note "The full water is at 1,221.4 ft at the top of the spillway. High water is at elevation 1,229 ft (not mapped)". I think someone should find an accurate and detailed elavation contour of Full Pool Operational Capacity of 1,219.0 ft. for full water level.
Chris Fleming (2023-09-06 22:44:13+00:00): Thanks for this - normally for closed shops we mark the shop as disused rather than deleting it.

Makes it easier to add a new shop back in, and is helpful in following the previous occupants.
SmithyScotland (2023-09-07 09:40:09+00:00): Thanks for the tip.  My understanding was the shop building was to be marked as vacant rather than the "Point of Interest".  In this case the shop wasn't actually marked so I couldn't mark as vacant.

So going forward I should mark the "point of Interest" as vacant?
NorthCrab_upload (2023-09-04 18:30:39+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2779659092
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1204976953

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eggie (2023-09-04 18:39:20+00:00): Dag Genevieve..

Denk niet dat dit allemaal correct is. 
Er was al een adresnode hier.
De dubbele vermelding van station meersen verwijderd. Stond ook nog op het gebouw.
De adressen gecombineerd.
De voorgaande mappers is een ervaren mapper, Vraag me af op die operators er wel bij horen. Die staan al op de relaties.
Je zou eens het forum kunnen raadplegen. 
MVG
eggie
Geneviève S (2023-09-04 19:34:43+00:00): Hallo Eggie,
Ik heb afgelopen weekend de railway=stations voor verschillende landen in de EU opgevraagd (NL, BE, DE, CH, IT en FR) en het viel mij op dat bij de treinstations in NL vrijwel overal de tags uic_ref en stations=train ontbreekt. Het is mijn doel om die voor NL overal toe te voegen. Verder valt op dat in de rest van Europa vrijwel overal de tag operator aanwezig is en in NL vrijwel niet, niet consequent of verouderd. In de landen die ik heb bestudeerd heb ik gezien dat bij het veld operator meestal de infrastructuurbeheerder wordt vermeld (in NL is dat ProRail) en de transportmaatschappijen die het station aandoen. Dat heeft als gevolg dat meerdere operators aan stations in NL toegekend zouden moeten worden.
Adressen zal ik verder niet invullen.
Groeten,
Geneviève
eggie (2023-09-04 19:39:48+00:00): Hoi Geneviève,
Ik denk dat je het even moet vragen op het forum. Daar komen de OV mappers ook.
Ik zie wel doorlopen dat haltes de operator krijgen en ik weet dat dat niet de afspraak is. Die hoort op de relatie. Hoe het met station precies zit weet ik niet precies, maar als ervaren mappers het niet hebben toegevoegd geeft dat bij mij vraagtekens.  Dus hier kun je evt. een draadje openen.
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/nl/43

Succes met de stations,
eggie
oarn (2023-10-01 21:28:14+00:00): Hei da det gjelder sti som du har lagt inn tror jeg du må ha gode støvler, det er et bekkefar under myra. gjelder sti nr #1204978617, v1
harahu (2023-10-01 23:30:15+00:00): Takk for at du sier i fra! Dette var åpenbart en feil, ja. Jeg har nå korrigert denne.
maraf24 (2023-09-04 22:37:04+00:00): #school_osmp dotyczy weryfikacji i aktualizacji danych POI obecnych w OSM.
Dodawania na podstawie wyłącznie rejestru nie wchodzi w jego zakres i jest niedozwolonym importem.
conradoos (2023-09-05 06:22:25+00:00): A na jakiej podstawie wyciągnąłeś taki wniosek?
maraf24 (2023-09-06 18:23:41+00:00): To jest pytanie na serio? 
Wszystkie informacje zamieściłeś w zestawie. Cytuję:
1. "dodawanie placówek edukacyjnych w Polsce #school_osmp"
2. source=RSPO
3. "Przedszkole Integracyjne nr 404 (11167618097, wersja 1)"
maraf24 (2023-09-06 18:33:15+00:00): Do tego dochodzi duża liczba takich zestawów z bardzo krótkimi, max kilkuminutowymi odstępami między nimi.
To zakumuflowany import nowych POI.
conradoos (2023-09-06 19:23:12+00:00): Moje pytanie było - i w dalszym ciągu jest - jak najbardziej serio, bo nie mam pojęcia, na jakiej podstawie twierdzisz, że "#school_osmp dotyczy weryfikacji i aktualizacji danych POI obecnych w OSM". Możesz podać źródło tego twierdzenia?
I nie zgodzę się z tym, że jest to "zakamuflowany" import, bo to jest zupełnie jawny import uzgodniony z innymi członkami społeczności.
maraf24 (2023-09-06 20:53:01+00:00): 1. Te informacje są wprost podane na stronie importu, czyli na https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Organised_Editing/Activities/Updating_and_mapping_schools_in_Poland

Cytuję: "Kampania ma na celu weryfikację i zaktualizowanie danych dotyczących szkół w Polsce, w tym dodanie numeru z Rejestru Szkół i Placówek Oświatowych (RSPO) oraz danych kontaktowych dla każdej placówki."

WERYFIKACJĘ I ZAKTUALIZOWANIE.

W żadnym miejscu tej stronie nie jest napisane o dodawaniu szkół nieistniejących w OSM.

2. Kilka miesięcy na ten temat prowadziłem dyskusję na Discordzie. Tam też mnie zapewniono, że chodzi tylko o aktualizację, a nie dodawanie nowych POI.

Tym samym:

Podaj źródło, które mówi o importowaniu nowych szkół i podaj link do utrwalonej dyskusji na ten temat ze społecznością.
conradoos (2023-09-07 19:25:43+00:00): Trzymajmy się tematu: skoro twierdzisz, że "#school_osmp dotyczy weryfikacji i aktualizacji danych POI obecnych w OSM", to w dalszym ciągu czekam na wskazanie, skąd czerpiesz takie informacje. Cytowane przez Ciebie zdanie nie zawiera takiej informacji.
Javierpf (2023-09-05 12:25:17+00:00): Hello! Thank you for the updates. It seems your changeset crosses many continents/countries. Please retain your changeset smaller. Let reviewers and other mappers check your edit more easily. It's impossible (almost) to keep track of the database and changes if changes in huge areas.
So I kindly ask you when you edit, retain your changeset in a particular smaller area -such as countries/provinces/municipality- save it first and then move to another area. Examples:
you are adding/modifying 10 objects in 2 distant cities => make 2 changesets, 1 per city.
you are adding/modifying 5 objects in 5 countries => make 5 changesets, 1 per country.
You'll find more information on the reason in this article: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
hypo808 (2023-09-06 11:03:26+00:00): Thanks for your report! I'm sorry that the current implementation causes this problem, and we know that this binds more resources than it should. The changeset size is a known issue that is fixed with the next version of Wheelmap that is currently in beta.

See https://github.com/sozialhelden/wheelmap-frontend/issues/327 for updates on this. You can try the new version on  https://beta.wheelmap.org if you want to check the new behavior yourself.
aceman444 (2023-10-02 16:32:06+00:00): Dakujem za obnovenie Billy po rekonstrukcii.
aceman444 (2024-01-22 19:30:38+00:00): Neviem ci toto bola najstastnejsia zmena. Ked mate subject:wikidata, kde je znacka 'subject'? Co je predmetom pamatnika? Vaclav Havel? Lenze k Vaclavovi Havlovi je ina wiki stranka, ako k jeho lavickam. Podla mna wikidata a wikipedia (a wikimedia_commons (ktore ste z neznamych pricin odstranili), mohlo zostat (kedze je to priamo o lavickach), a v subject* mohlo byt o Vaclavovi Havlovi.
marc__marc (2024-09-08 08:42:42+00:00): Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1204983900
confucian catholique ?
wrong autocomplete for chretian ?
Regards,
Marc
aceman444 (2023-10-02 16:31:35+00:00): Oprava?
No nevratili ste to na building=retail, ako to bolo predtym a ako naznacovalo building=construction+construction=retail. Uz to nie je maloobchodna budova?
vlakos555 (2023-10-02 16:36:55+00:00): Nerozumiem čo je zle. Billa už normálne funguje. Vráťte všetko do normálu, ako treba. Ď.
aceman444 (2023-10-02 17:31:46+00:00): Dali ste len building=yes, namiesto building=retail, aj ked ste to tam mali pripravene, ze to asi tak bude.
gscholz (2023-09-06 18:35:31+00:00): Hi JuanMelo,
this changeset has created several errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-75.45677&lat=5.03560&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=140819502

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
JuanMelo (2023-09-10 23:24:12+00:00): Hi,

I can't see how is the issue, could you show me the problem?

Thank you.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-09-04 19:00:17+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2180065278
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1075535194

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
KB-01 (2023-09-06 18:35:12+00:00): Hi, Just a heads up that you seem to be adding the same objects in multiple changesets, creating situations where multiple copies of the same fire hydrant, bench, etc. are stacked on top of each other.
RangerDanger825 (2023-09-17 12:17:27+00:00): Thanks for pointing that out. I also noticed and don't know why it's happening. I'm a rather new mapper and was using Everydoor. I've been trying to remove the dupes with the help of someone else, but if you see any more, please feel free to remove the extra points. Do you know what might have caused this? Thanks.
eggie (2023-09-04 19:29:32+00:00): Dag ggroen..

Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=140820187

Zoals je ziet zie je bij overlapping alles door elkaar. landuse en water bewerken met editor iD is sowieso lastig. Dat kan beter met editor JOSM.
Daar kun je ook een plugin installeren die water uitsnijdt
Polygon Cur Out.
Ik heb het water nu even uitgesneden met die plugin.
Wat wel 'kwalijk' is als landusevlakken vastgemaakt worden aan wegen en paden. De kaart wordt dan onwerkbaar. 

Voor de betere editor zie..
editor josm stap voor stap
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710       


https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/PolygonCutOut

Mapse
eggie
eggie (2023-09-04 19:33:34+00:00): Die paden zitten overal aan de landuse vast helaas.  Laat het maar zo, want er loopt ook een wandelroute overheen en die kun je niet bewerken met editor iD
De aanrader is dus josm.
Groet
eggie
burrscurr (2023-09-05 17:14:14+00:00): Hi mihue,

thanks for your contribution to OpenStreetMap! The changes look good to me. You might consider preserving the type of street when replacing it with highway=construction (here, by also adding construction=tertiary). Editors like StreetComplete use that to restore the street category when construction is finished.

Cheers,
burrscurr
mariotomo (2023-09-07 09:50:58+00:00): hola. bienvenida a OSM. por favor ten en cuenta que esta base de datos no es un "sandbox". si se trata de una prueba, los datos son reales, o fictivos? de todas maneras no es buena práctica utilizar nombres genéricos. por favor, contesta a este comentario para entrar en contacto con el resto de la comunidad OSM. gracias!
jb54osm (2023-09-06 14:05:22+00:00): Hi happi...,

We don't map for nice visibility on Carto. We map what is on the ground. Are there shop in the city hall?

If no than please revert this change too.
happilymappingrway (2023-09-06 14:55:30+00:00): OSM Carto guide book mentions the use of “commercial” area for government buildings. That is why I chose to use it for the city hall. There are no shops here but there are “services.” Do you still think I am wrong in using “commercial?”  It is not the same as “retail.”  Thank you for your assistance. See this —https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dcommercial
jb54osm (2023-09-06 15:08:35+00:00): Hi,

I checked a few town halls around me. Saw no pink colors, except when there were shops inside.
I don't think anyone in Holland will see a town hall as "used for commercial purposes" as explained here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dcommercial (US views might differ.)

Yeah, I think you'd better remove the commercial area.

Thanks for your understanding.
LarsBG (2023-10-02 03:32:58+00:00): Hi 

Are you sure there are solcelles here?.
It look to me more like an old mink farm.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/709219669
b-holdet (2023-10-02 08:58:41+00:00): Minkfarm
https://dma.mst.dk/vis-sag/110873
b-holdet (2023-10-02 08:59:53+00:00): Aktiv P-nummer
https://datacvr.virk.dk/enhed/produktionsenhed/1000083790?fritekst=1000083790&sideIndex=0&size=10
CCRDude (2023-10-02 09:07:24+00:00): Did I flag that as solar, or did I just update? Anyway, will check my photos for details later; I've only seen it from walking the road Klapleddet three or four times, can very well be mistaken since it's surrounded by bushes.
eggie (2023-09-04 20:22:23+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 
MVG, 
Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-09-04 20:12:56+00:00): Alle begin is moeilijk.

Een note=...  is een aanwijzing voor een medemapper... een description= voor een algemene gebruiker.
Om aan te geven dat iets dood loopt zet je op de eindnode noexit=yes  Dan krijg je ook geen foutmelding meer.
Ik heb dat nu even gedaan als voorbeeld.
gr eggie
burrscurr (2023-09-05 17:08:52+00:00): Hallo! Danke für den Beitrag zu OSM. Bitte den description=-Tag nicht für Werbung verwenden (siehe Wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:description). Danke!