piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
tomhukins (2025-05-08 15:42:36+00:00): When you add pavements, such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1337412668, it would be very helpful if you would also add "sidewalk=separate" (or better "sidewalk:both=separate") to the corresponding road, in this case https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/63126314

Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sidewalk#Separately_mapped_sidewalks or ask if you have any questions.
Merzof (2025-05-24 21:07:07+00:00): Hi Tom, just a quick apology as I now see you've told me this multiple times but I've never seen any changeset comments on my profile until today. Thanks for the advice and I'll change these going forward.
tomhukins (2025-05-25 13:19:31+00:00): Thank you: I'm glad to hear you will continue making the map better - you've already done a lot of useful work.
eggie (2025-05-07 11:56:56+00:00): Dag Deknotsaap.. Alle begin is moeilijk. Het vlak is al getagd met fioetsenstalling. Dan niet nogmaals de info op een node. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-05-07 11:58:59+00:00): Duplicated tagging verwijderd.
gr eggie
user_22463405 (2025-05-07 13:26:50+00:00): Hi, the new link which lead you from A1 to Mohammédia ouest is opened for vehicles, So it isn't a road under construction, you can see the Last sentinel imagery in Copernicus browser (05-05-2025), Finally thank you for editing in Casablanca.
Aya Samir (2025-05-08 11:42:06+00:00): Hi Amineee__;
Thank you for your contribution to OpenStreetMap.
If possible, could you please share any official sources regarding this update with me?
Also, I want to thank you for reaching out.
Best regards,
Aya Samir
user_22463405 (2025-05-08 23:34:10+00:00): https://www.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=1120166683446147&id=100063584766525
This is a architectural design for the interchange.
Aya Samir (2025-05-13 14:17:29+00:00): Hi Amineee__,
Thank you for your response.
Best regards,
Aya Samir
eggie (2025-05-07 11:55:30+00:00): Dag Deknotsaap.. wetland  heeft ook een specificatie nodig.
Zie wiki.. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wetland

MVG
eggie
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:53:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:57:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
eggie (2025-05-07 11:52:06+00:00): Dag Deknotsaap.. Dit is niet correct. Het natuurgebied staat al met naam op het vlak.
leisure= park hoort ook niet op een node. 
Ik haal je bijdrage voorlopig weer weg.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-05-07 11:53:23+00:00): reverted by changeset #165935119
geomaniX (2025-05-14 05:51:48+00:00): Moin,
vielen Dank für's Hinzufügen der Hausnummern!
Die Hausnummer 32 gibt es jetzt allerdings doppelt. Einmal am way 1353243653 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1353243653) und als Punkt (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12816941751).
Ist der Punkt zufällig ein im Bau befindliches Gebäude?

VG
geomaniX
Akram74 (2025-05-19 21:24:54+00:00): Hallo geomaniX,
wie ich das in Erinnerung habe, existiert gar kein Gebäude (auch nicht im Bau) gegenüber Nr. 32.
Die richtige 32 steht neben der 30.
Schöne Grüße
Akram
eggie (2025-05-07 13:46:55+00:00): Dag molensteen. 
Wel beter zo. 
Eigenlijk horen de nodes van het bruggedeelte op de weg te eindigen op het vlak man_made= bridge. Ik heb het aangepast.
MVG
eggie
Andrew_Grozny (2025-05-07 12:12:57+00:00): Прошу подтвердить
literan (2025-05-09 14:00:41+00:00): и тут все переломано, даже границы Москвы умудрились сломать
eggie (2025-05-07 13:36:08+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  Wat is je bedoeling met deze wijziging? Voorlopig maak ik deze weer ongedaan.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Gleb_Artyomenko (2025-05-08 08:04:53+00:00): clarification: road geometry was fixed based on Bing Maps Aerial #mapbox_editing
NorthCrab_upload (2025-05-07 12:40:48+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3137685497
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/931064488

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
rempshaener (2025-05-07 16:58:19+00:00): Hallo,

du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Ich habe zwei kleine Anmerkungen.
Der Name, den du vergeben hast, ist eigentlich nicht der Gebäudename, sondern der Name einer Einrichtung. Hier dürfte emergency=disaster_response passen.
Da das Katastrophenschutzzentrum sicherlich nicht nur das Gebäude, sondern auch Umlagen umfasst, wäre es zudem sinnvoll, diese Tags auf das Gelände zu ziehen.
Bitte melde dich einfach, wenn du Fragen dazu hast.

Viele Grüße
javbw (2026-01-08 06:40:50+00:00): be careful of mapping land uses as buildings. This is bad mapping. 

landuse=retail is useful for mapping the area used for a shop (the building + parking lot, etc), whereas building=yes is *only* for the actual building.  Most of Japan's shops are building=retail, as they were purpose-built for selling things, not converted houses or old factories.
R0bst3r (2025-05-13 06:35:39+00:00): Hallo Joma,
die Breite 2m für den gesamte Brandweg kann fast nicht sein?
Warst du wirklich mit StreetComplete vor Ort und hats gemessen? Oder waren eher 2 Spuren gemeint?

Grüße R0bst3r
Le Petit Léo (2025-08-31 11:39:25+00:00): Hello Silat,
The poor navigation experience you had was due to incorrect tags on the ways.
You added turn restrictions, but that is not the correct method.
You need to add access=no on service roads of motorway.
Look here:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=19/46.207203/4.783304

The correct tag is on the service way on the left.
And your changes are on the right.
Could you modify all your changes ?
Thanks.
And sorry for my bad english.
Good journey.
jcarlson (2025-05-08 16:14:18+00:00): i missed that one. good catch!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165938077
Dawid2849 (2025-05-15 18:57:58+00:00): Cześć,
jechałem dzisiaj z Księżpola do Łukowej i tutaj na pewno nie ma pola: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1121922101
Kiedyś to było zaplecze rozbudowy DW835, później leżały tu śmieci (typu stare znaki), a obecnie jest po prostu jakiś plac, ale na pewno nie jest to pole. Zmieniam ponownie na brownfield, gdyż jest to najbardziej adekwatny landuse
KrzysztZ (2025-05-18 12:44:18+00:00): ok, jechałem tamtędy końcem października ub. roku i  o tej porze już nie zawsze było dobrze widać co jest na polu
literan (2025-05-09 13:58:50+00:00): все переломали своей правкой. Не надо так. Откатываю
HirschKauz (2025-05-08 11:24:29+00:00): Hi! 
what do you want to express by [acnfy25=yes]? because this is not a regular key for OSM.
Regards
NorthCrab_upload (2025-05-07 13:31:18+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1373872045

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-08-15 13:47:41+00:00): Byłeś na miejscu jak to edytowałeś? Bo chyba budowa wtedy jeszcze skończona nie była
Dodko (2025-05-14 15:56:06+00:00): Prečo ste začali pridávať slovo Ulica do názvu ulice?
Marian Mika (2025-05-14 16:05:59+00:00): Kostolište ešte nemalo aktualizované adresy po zavedení uličného systému. Tým pádom ani ulice nemali vložené nové názvy. Názvy ulíc som prevzal z registra adries. Rovnako sú názvy ulíc uvádzané aj na ZBGISe. Viem že to asi nie je podľa zaužívaných zvyklostí na OSM, ale mojou prioritou bolo aktualizovanie adries s tým, že ak slová 'cesta', 'ulica' v názve nie sú správne, tak to niekto skúsenejší dotiahne do správnej formy.
Dodko (2025-05-14 16:24:53+00:00): Treba pozrieť https://groups.google.com/g/osm_sk/c/NEJlJhUbhWA/m/QZgF71ZpBwAJ
Marian Mika (2025-05-14 16:47:05+00:00): Vďaka za odkaz, upravím názvy ulíc podľa zaužívaných pravidiel
literan (2025-05-09 13:56:39+00:00): не понял, вы внесли, что в этом здании пятиэтажная крыша https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37757025/history

вы уверены?
literan (2025-05-09 13:57:54+00:00): в окрестных домах то же самое - 4-, 3-этажные крыши. Что это?
Travieso (2025-05-10 07:36:13+00:00): Вообще я отвечал на вопрос "сколько этажей в здании включая крышу".
Travieso (2025-05-10 07:37:49+00:00): Я понял, в новой версии они переформулировали вопрос на "сколько этажей в составе крыши"
Конечно ничего не надо менять. Прошу прощения.
literan (2025-05-10 10:52:27+00:00): понял, тогда я в этих домах теги типа roof:levels=5 удаляю
eggie (2025-05-07 16:29:57+00:00): Dag hrooz,

Wellicht een toren mappen op de node?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dtower

MVG
eggie
Taya_S (2025-05-07 17:17:27+00:00): Ik denk dat het in ieder geval handig is om tourism=attraction hier te verwijderen. Het is naar mijn weten namelijk niet mogelijk om dit gebouw te bezoeken.

De wiki data kan beter toegevoegd worden aan het gebouw zelf ipv specifiek een toren. 

vriendelijke groet,
Taya
hrooz (2025-05-07 18:45:55+00:00): Hallo Taya,

Dank je voor je opmerking, ik zat er al mee te worstelen.
De Palthetoren is eigenlijk het huis Sprengenberg en het landgoed erom heen heet De Sprengenberg.
De Palthetoren is echter goed zichtbaar en kenmerkend voor de ongeving en bekend als zodanig.

Wat is nu het beste, toevoegen aan het huis met naam en afbeelding of apart als een punt?

Het is nl ook geen separate toren.

Ik hoor graag van je.

Vriendelijke groeten,

Hans
jleedev (2025-05-18 20:48:17+00:00): This was unnecessary, reverted.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166448550
fortera_au (2025-06-26 09:02:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
Frans S (2025-05-09 14:37:47+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
We welcome you as a new mapper.
Difficult area to map here.
Unfortunately, many buildings are not aligned to their footprint or incorrect mapped.
About mapping of high buildings.  They show a large shadow.
Difficult area to map.
Big building blocks with several stories and courtyards

Check here how high buildings ought to be mapped.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1z7uDwYm4oNmlexHIhJxGCjPpNhCQAgRia5aEJr_4MwM/edit?usp=sharing

Many tall buildings have a small building, a superstructure, lift building or something similar on the roof, do not map it as a separate building, just map the roof lines of the complete building.

Best regards and keep mapping
silversurfer83 (2025-05-07 19:03:06+00:00): Gude :)

Trampelpfade sind doch eigentlich hw=path + informal=yes  (oder statt informal auch path=desire)

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165940587
user_5359 (2025-05-08 11:21:05+00:00): Hello! Please be more careful! I revert your change set, because you move to many highway crossing nodes!
gmar5 (2025-05-07 16:15:59+00:00): Hi. The church was demolished more than a century ago. The surviving tower is not a place of worship.
Andrew Chadwick (2025-05-07 23:34:33+00:00): Updated to remove the PoW tagging, and I'm trying to accommodate the most common name in name=* too, if that's what https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165938610 is about.
EBattman (2025-05-08 08:22:17+00:00): Hi Andrew, I appreciate your comment. We manage the App & Website for Oxford Bus Company and utilise the site to pull points of interest. I need to tag the site with a key which we include in our search filtering. This can be 'amenity', 'leisure' or 'tourism'. I'm open to suggestions for better tagging.
Andrew Chadwick (2025-05-08 11:20:05+00:00): Hi EBattman, and thanks for the reply.

tourism=* is certainly the way to go for this tower. I've added tags for two tourist features, since they're slightly different in nature, and different features in OSM should get distinct objects

1. the viewing platform: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12819165592

2. the historic building itself: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/311139684

Don't rely on the node/way IDs too much, since they might be replaced with new objects. If you're freshly pulling tourism=* on a reasonable regular basis though, you're good to go, no matter how we divide up the map features
literan (2025-05-09 13:55:26+00:00): там же в SC есть пункт "Нет названия", он добавляет тег noname=yes

не стоит писать такое в тег name
Travieso (2025-05-10 07:27:34+00:00): Понял. Пункт называется "Здесь нет вывески с названием". Сбило с толку, что вывеска есть - просто названия нет)
skadi (2025-05-10 20:04:39+00:00): а сюда ты зачем полез? ты там был? зачем удалять линии, про которые ты ничего не знаешь?
skadi (2025-05-10 20:05:15+00:00): пардон. тут все нормально.
Nekoatthegates (2025-05-08 20:54:33+00:00): Correction: Source used was Esri World Imagery.
zuicz (2025-05-11 20:41:55+00:00): Dlaczego =secondary do terminala cargo?
pavvv (2025-05-11 21:28:34+00:00): Dlaczego nie? Dlaczego tranzyt cargo ma być mniej ważny niż osobowy? DK68, które jest tylko dla tirów ma primary i do terminali kontenerowych w Gdyni i Gdańsku też doprowadzone jest primary.
zuicz (2025-05-12 10:48:39+00:00): To jest dojazd do 1 [jednego] budynku, a nie droga krajowa prowadząca do najważniejszego przejścia granicznego na szlaku wschód-zachód. Ciężarówki nie wsiadają na samolot, tylko wypakowują swój towar.
pavvv (2025-05-12 19:34:46+00:00): Stan na rok 2022, transport cargo na portach lotniczych polskich:
Okęcie (Warszawa) 103600 t
Jasionka (Rzeszów) 53104 t
Pyrzowice (Katowice) 29127 t
Gdańsk 9600 t
Strachowice (Wrocław) 2091 t
Ławica (Poznań) 44 t
Łódź 22 t
Lublin 9 t

Tak więc to lotnisko jest trzecim największym pod względem ilości transportowanych towarów w Polsce. Uważam, że co najmniej secondary jest adekwatne.
zuicz (2025-05-12 21:01:09+00:00): Frankfurt Main - 2 050 082 t – tertiary
Lipsk Halle - 1 393 747 t – unclassified

Nie ma ustaleń albo zapisów na wiki mówiących aby podwyższać kategorie dróg prowadzących do terminali cargo.
pavvv (2025-05-12 22:28:24+00:00): W innych krajach nie stosuje się konkretnych kategorii do portów lotniczych, co uważam za duży błąd i jest to prawdopodobnie skutek tagowania pod render.

Jest konwencja, aby podwyższać drogi do terminali cargo w portach, patrz Gdańsk i Gdynia. Plus tutaj nie proponuję primary jak na tamtych portach, tylko secondary.
Kategorie dróg nie powinny być porównywane do kategorii na całym świecie. To, że w jednym miejscu podwyższę drogę do secondary, nie znaczy, że obchodzi mnie jak ta droga porównuje się do innych dróg tej kategorii w Niemczech (+ w Niemczech kopiuje się klasyfikację urzędową)
Na forum inni zgodzili się, aby do największego lotniska pasażerskiego doprowadzić primary, do kolejnych największych secondary, a później tertiary. Uważam, że można w ten sam sposób skategoryzować drogi do terminali cargo portów lotniczych. Primary do największego, secondary do kolejnych dwóch, tertiary dla reszty. Jest jeszcze kwestia obecnej pomocy dla Ukrainy lecącej przez Rzeszów, więc gdyby tego nie liczyć, to w Katowicach jest drugi największy lotniczy terminal carto w Polsce.
Jeśli nic z tego Cię nie przekonało, to jaką kategorię proponujesz? Jeśli którąś tranzytową (inną niż service), to dlaczego akurat tą?
zuicz (2025-05-13 12:31:50+00:00): Terminale cargo znacząco różnią się od terminali pasażerskich, nie są tak ważnymi obiektami i nie generują takiego ruchu. W tym przypadku unclassified w zupełności wystarczy, to jest droga dojazdowa do jednego budynku i w ciągu dnia więcej jeździ nią autobusów do przystanku końcowego niż ciężarówek. Porównywanie z portami morskimi jest niekoniecznie dobre, port morski w Gdańsku w 2024 roku miał 77,4 mln ton obrotów ładunkowych, Pyrzowice 37 175 t.
pavvv (2025-05-13 14:59:09+00:00): No cóż, zrobiłem co mogłem, ale nie znam się na ruchu w tej okolicy. Uważam jednak, że do tak dużego terminala cargo powinno dochodzić jak nie secondary, to tertiary. Unclassified może być dla terminala w Szczecinie/Goleniowie, gdzie statystyki wynoszą 0 ton.
CurlingMan13 (2025-05-17 21:43:13+00:00): Changeset reverted in part or full.  We use access tags to denote if something is private.  You can read more on why deletion is not the answer here:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can't_I_delete_this_trail%3F

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166409818
MxxCon (2025-05-09 22:25:15+00:00): Are those legitimately "no sidewalk" in a legal sense or would it be sidewalk with different surface like "grass"? Because these disconnected segments are useless for pedestrian routing...
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165941516
PHerison (2025-05-10 17:30:39+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM
Thanks for contributing, bur your additions are some kind of odd.
Please join the discussion at the OSM-forum:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/kleine-frage-was-ist-ein-outpost-shop/129849
Frans S (2025-05-09 13:56:40+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
Difficult area. Blocks of buildings with several stories.
About mapping of high buildings.  They show a large shadow.
Check here how high buildings ought to be mapped.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1z7uDwYm4oNmlexHIhJxGCjPpNhCQAgRia5aEJr_4MwM/edit?usp=sharing

Many tall buildings have a small building, a superstructure, lift building or something similar on the roof, do not map it as a separate building, just map the roof lines of the complete building.

Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2025-05-09 14:00:58+00:00): HI again. 
Please don't forget to square each rectangular building when it is still selected with the Q key.
best regards
eggie (2025-05-07 16:14:01+00:00): Welcome to OSM.
I added amenity=drinking_water here for rendering.
Greetz,
eggie
Thomasju (2025-05-07 17:39:49+00:00): @Eggie (does this work?)

Thank you! Figuring out how to make correct contributions. :)

I made a new contribution with more stuff. Let me know if there's any improvements there.
eggie (2025-05-07 17:43:45+00:00): watertap will not render... drinking_water will do the job.
I'll send your our welcomemail in Dutch.
CTRL-F5 to refresh your screen. 
eggie
CurlingMan13 (2025-05-17 21:43:14+00:00): Changeset reverted in part or full.  We use access tags to denote if something is private.  You can read more on why deletion is not the answer here:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can't_I_delete_this_trail%3F

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166409818
emersonveenstra (2025-08-04 17:22:38+00:00): Hi there,

I know this was a while ago, but I'm looking at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1384371457 west of South Clare Avenue and I can't find any aerial imagery that shows a river there. Like you drew it crossing this driveway https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/17759086#map=19/43.929136/-84.768447 but there's no river there, or any infrastructure like a bridge or culvert. and I don't see any continuous stretch of water along US 127 that would be classified as a river
Skunkman56 (2025-08-07 13:36:49+00:00): Hi, not my way, looks like it was originally copied from USGS topographic maps, but I went back and fixed it up anyways, downgrading the Middle Branch Tobacco River to a stream in its upper reaches. its indeed there according to ESRI World Imagery, USGS 3DEP Elevation program - you can see the stream channel and culverts
❤️‍🔥 (2025-05-08 12:23:53+00:00): Hi, what do you mean by inside out? As far as I can tell, this relation is correct.

If it's rendering strangely in the iD editor, that might be because it's not fully downloaded. This link will open the editor will the relation fully downloaded: https://osm.org/edit?relation=5134651
neuhausr (2025-05-07 15:02:00+00:00): Hi, I was doing a cleanup edit in the area, and noticed all the buildings with their address in the name. Wanted to make sure you're aware that's generally not recommended in OSM--it's already in the "addr" fields. (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only )  Great work you're doing in this area, though--happy mapping!
eggie (2025-05-07 16:15:10+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback Please use the present addressnodes to tag on.
Don't add addresses. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-05-07 16:26:45+00:00): Adres hersteld... Svp adresnodes intact laten.
MVG
eggie
b-jazz (2025-05-08 14:16:46+00:00): Hello tizzzod,

As I mentioned a couple weeks ago on a previous changeset of yours (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165307330), fairways and greens (and most other golf course elements other than golf=hole) shouldn't intersect. Please refer to the wiki in the previous comments on how to properly map courses.
Jay May (2025-06-05 08:01:20+00:00): Do NOT change the "name" tags to Russian. According to the rules in Kazakhstan, it must be in Kazakh. Russian language must be in name:ru.
eggie (2025-05-07 16:25:19+00:00): Dat Spicetree Dat adres is hier onbekend en ook niet volledig.
Ik heb het adres aangepast.

MVG
eggie
silversurfer83 (2025-05-07 19:09:46+00:00): Hi Corey :)

thank you for this nice update. Lots of useful new info.

There are 3 wiki links I would like you to have a look at to make your future work with OSM even better:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sidewalks

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

thank you

happy mapping
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165943377
eggie (2025-05-07 16:20:48+00:00): De winkel stond al op de kaart. Je bijdrage heb ik verwijderd. Het was ook de verkeerde adresnode. 
MVG
eggie
fortera_au (2025-05-08 03:16:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 165963605 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: fictional game editing
SafwatHalaby (2025-05-10 12:27:34+00:00): Hello and thank you for your contributions OSM!

Have you ensured your changes are aligned with the Israel specific road grading guidelines defined here?: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Israel#Inter-city_roads

It's also worth checking out the basic guidelines: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Israel#The_basics
cuscoexplorer (2025-05-16 11:59:47+00:00): Hello,
Thank you, I re-read just in case and it matches (although most of the streets are urban streets and not inter-city).
Not that it proves anything, but FYI I am a transportation planner and the updates I made were following a recent survey of the city for a project.
SafwatHalaby (2025-05-16 12:36:04+00:00): Thank you for the feedback. One reason I asked is because after these edits, some roads from Secondary to Tertiary mid-way. Although this is not impossible, I thought suspected it's a mapping error. 

For example, יהודה הלווי street is now secondary south of a roundabout, and tertiary north of it. See here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27167957

Same with יגאל אלון here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/750048540, East to West.

I think the highway categories may have been modified inconsistently.

Could you please double check them or verify that this is what you intended to do?
SafwatHalaby (2025-05-16 12:37:01+00:00): I slightly mistyped a sentence. The wording is:

"Thank you for the feedback. One reason I asked is because after these edits, some roads change from Secondary to Tertiary mid-way. Although this is not impossible, I suspect it's a mapping error. "
SafwatHalaby (2025-05-16 12:39:22+00:00): It also happens on the following junctions:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1198111283

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1136296520

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/750048541
yrtimiD (2025-07-04 17:43:09+00:00): Hi, if you are transportation planner and if you do know some local official rules (and if not), you are welcome to join relevant roads categorization discussion on the forum https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/topic/130247