piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
bxl-forever (2025-10-28 15:50:36+00:00): Please do not create extra address points.  Addresses in Belgium are computed automatically and we prefer not to have to manage duplicates on POI.
We fixed your edit, as well as the previous one.
NeisBot (2025-10-28 10:30:41+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Pest control services in Richmond VA"
NeisBot (2025-10-28 10:30:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description
NeisReview (2025-11-01 19:32:35+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/173884247

Thanks, user_5359
sykul (2025-10-28 12:45:28+00:00): Formidable, merci pour la bonne contribution.
rusjanis (2025-11-02 17:46:15+00:00): Sveiks, kur ir lanes:backward=? Ai ai ai :)  https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=highways&lon=24.04312&lat=56.91732&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=unknown_way%2Cunknown_node%2Ctype_road%2Cname_missing_major%2Cname_missing_minor%2Cname_fixme%2Cref_long%2Coneway%2Clanes%2Cmaxspeed%2Cmaxheight%2Cmaxweight%2Cmaxlength%2Crelations_with_highway%2Cmultiple_lifecycle_states%2Cincomplete_nonop%2Cabandoned%2Cdisused%2Cconstruction%2Cproposed%2Cunknown_way%2Cunknown_node%2Ctype_road%2Cname_missing_major%2Cname_missing_minor%2Cname_fixme%2Cref_long%2Coneway%2Clanes%2Cmaxspeed%2Cmaxheight%2Cmaxweight%2Cmaxlength%2Crelations_with_highway%2Cmultiple_lifecycle_states%2Cincomplete_nonop%2Cabandoned%2Cdisused%2Cconstruction%2Cproposed
rusjanis (2025-11-02 17:54:25+00:00): Un visu Lielo ielu 😱 😅
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/223368670#map=14/56.90774/24.03388
HellMap (2025-11-02 17:57:39+00:00): Sveiki, jā, uz https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1445737341 palika `lanes=2` no vecā gabala, es nepārliku lanes=3; izlaboju. Es gan galīgi nesaprotu, ko OMSI rāda te - visus trīs gabalus izņemot to, par kuru runa...
HellMap (2025-11-02 17:59:49+00:00): Ā, ups, otram nebija jābūt jauniem tegiem. Laikam iD nebija sadalījis punktā ceļu, kad liku vērtības un, pēc tam vēlreiz mēģinot sadalīt, nepaskatījos...
rusjanis (2025-11-02 18:09:24+00:00): OMSI uzreiz kļūdas nerāda, bet pēc pāris h.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1445737341 Te trūkts lanes:forward.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1445737337 lanes:backward
rusjanis (2025-11-02 18:13:10+00:00): Tāpēc es labāk laboju uz JOSM + Plugins visu vieglāk pārskatīt :)
HellMap (2025-11-02 18:41:07+00:00): Ā, tādā ziņā trūkst. OSMI tad tas problēmas apraksts nav gluži precīzs. Bet tie jau arī nav stingri obligāti, bet nu jā, pilnībai vajadzētu likt. Man godīgi sakot pat tos pamata lanes drukāt laika aptrūkst... ļoti daudz kur neesmu vispār licis, jo nevaru paspēt... 😥 Te es saliku, ko ceļa ģeometrija arī nobīdījusies un gribēju lai skaidrāks līdz jaunajam ortofoto. Gribēju labāk, sanāca kā parasti...

P.S. OSMI laikam reizi dienā atjauno kopā ar visu Geofabriku, kad ikdienas planet dump pieejami, nevis pāris stundas? Tur apakšā update date. Bet es neesmu skatījies precīzi pēdējā laikā, varbūt tagad arī citādi kaut kas.
rusjanis (2025-11-02 18:57:09+00:00): Ir jau ok, visi mēs mēdzam kļūdīties 😊
OSMI jā es tur to laiku neskatos, bet zinu reizi dienā atjaunina.
Luzandro (2025-10-28 17:52:26+00:00): gehört der wikidata-Eintrag nicht zu der Haltestelle https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2673144959 ?
Linie29 (2025-10-28 18:25:06+00:00): Das ist ein bisschen tricky weil es hier "Guntramsdorf-Kaiserau" und "Guntramsdorf-Kaiserau Haltestelle" gibt die auch unterschiedliche Betriebsstellenkürzel haben aber die selbe IBNR-Nummer. Wenn man da ganz genau ist müsste man theoretisch zwei Wikidata-Einträge machen und dann auch noch zwei Wikicommons-Kategorien ... das wäre mMn zu viel des Guten. 

Man kann den Wikidata-Eintrag somit auch noch auf die Haltestelle setzen.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-28 22:33:50+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1215115590

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
pan_borsuk (2025-10-29 13:52:16+00:00): dziękuje Krabie.

już widzę co dałem za dużo

poszedłem na łatwiznę i aaplikowałem tym dwum domom..punkt adresowy instead :-)

pozdr z małopolski
eggie (2025-10-28 11:48:09+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  Het is beter om die (nog) bestaande paden van access=no te voorzien.
Wanneer ze opgaan in het landschap taggen we ze vervolgens met disused:highway=path en te voorzien van een note=....  
Wanneer je paden verwijdert zullen ze gewoon weer ingetekend worden door medemappers 
Ze zijn immers gewoon te zien op een recente luchtfoto. 
Je zegt.. Het pad is verwijderd. Wat bedoel je daarmee. afgesloten access=no of verdwenen (disused:highway=path)? 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-10-28 11:51:55+00:00): De paden heb ik teruggezet met access=no.
Wanneer ze niet meer zichtbaar zijn dan aanpassen als bovenstaand.
Wanneer op de luchtfoto niets meer te zien is dan kunnen ze verwijderd worden.

MVG
eggie
Ben van Laar (2025-10-28 13:10:55+00:00): Beste Eggie,
Dank voor de snelle reactie. De paden zijn verwijderd: omgeploegd, afgestrooid met heideplaggen en er is een hek voor gezet. 
Op de volgende luchtfoto zijn ze dus verdwenen, hoewel er waarschijnlijk nog wel lang een kleurverschil met de oude heide ernaast te zien zal zijn.
eggie (2025-10-28 13:14:41+00:00): Oke.. in dat geval highway=.. vervangen door disused:highway=path . Dan zie je de paden niet meer op de kaart en het voorkomt opnieuw intekenen. Doe je dat zelf?

Mvg..
eggie
eggie (2025-10-28 13:23:08+00:00): De paden heb ik aangepast naar disused:highway met note= Paden zijn omgeploegd door de Gemeente Ermelo
Ben van Laar (2025-10-28 13:28:29+00:00): Ha Eggie,
Ik zie nu hoe je dat gedaan hebt! Bedankt hiervoor.
Gr.Ben
NeisBot (2025-10-28 10:45:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description
NeisBot (2025-10-28 10:45:42+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Health clinic in Clarendon Hills and Burr Ridge"
NeisReview (2025-11-01 19:31:01+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/174077544
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-28 22:33:52+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1445740144

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Sylabowy Kot (2025-10-28 10:51:13+00:00): Survey też był źródłem. 

Nie sprawdzałem dostępności dróg przed osiedlem (access=no to przesada), ale oczywista jest przejezdność do jego obsługi.
michael_ua (2025-11-02 13:58:53+00:00): Не робіть будівлю мультиполігом без поважних на то причин.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174104180
yelisey90 (2025-10-28 15:20:28+00:00): Are you sure that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/62215493 connects to Nugzar Shanava Street?
KarooDesert (2025-10-30 09:52:15+00:00): Thank you for reaching out and raising that concern. I’ll ensure the connection to the Nugzar Shanava Street is accurate and everything is properly aligned.
Again thank you for catching that! Happy Mapping!
wies1 (2025-10-28 11:02:59+00:00): Fehler bei source:

Buildings and addresses

GWR Swisstopo 2025
eggie (2025-10-28 11:58:04+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Het is inderdaad gebruikelijk binnen OSM om geen name=  te gebruiken om iets te beschrijven. 
Het bedrijf kan het beste op het terrein worden getagd met landuse=farmyard name=... 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse=farmyard
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Curni_ (2025-10-28 12:55:47+00:00): Hoi Eggie,

Dankjewel voor het kijken, ik heb net een nieuwe bewerking voorgesteld waar het terrein is gelabeld ipv de schuren.

groet
AndresDuhour (2026-01-16 11:32:51+00:00): Buen día, veo que agregaste áreas comerciales en lugares donde no las hay... Incluso en el museo histórico. Quería consultar por la intención o la fuente del cambio, porque habría que corregir varias cosas.
user_5359 (2025-10-28 13:44:15+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database.
Please only draw in existing objects and facts. Did you have any more information for a natural = cave_entrance inside of a building?
sleipner (2025-10-29 00:48:15+00:00): Have you been there? The restaurant is closed since three years now. I've been there several times. There is absolut no activity. 
Information on website is not current.
Please, don't provide wrong informations.
aTarom (2025-10-29 06:30:45+00:00): Hello, could you please review my edit? I removed only the spaces because the phone number started with “+ 34…” and that space between the “+” and the “34” is not correct, so I just fixed that and check the absence of error at website. The mistake was that I closed the note instead of leaving a comment, which was my intention.
By the way, why don’t you use the “disused:...” scheme? That way, things like this wouldn’t happen.
TrickyFoxy (2025-11-13 23:46:18+00:00): Ссылка, увы оказалась без значимой части. К слову можно добавлять и другие соцсети, если есть
mcast (2025-10-28 13:59:51+00:00): New building (since satellite imagery) is not drawn
user_5359 (2025-10-29 10:16:10+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/126498951. Quick question: Why is only the descriptive key cutline marked with the prefix disused, but not the main key man_made?
sys3175 (2025-10-29 11:27:06+00:00): It's still a visible cutline (no trees,only grass and little shrubs), but no longer a firebreak because the railway has been removed. - Of course, one could remove the tag completely. I kept it to show the history...
Ltrlg (2025-10-29 08:50:54+00:00): Ça fait serré pour mettre trois restaurants dans ce bâtiment. Êtes-vous sûr(e) que ce restaurant ne replace pas plutôt l’un des deux déjà cartographiés ?
NBMAnjoutourisme (2025-10-31 15:52:29+00:00): oui en effet, je viens d'avoir la confirmation, il remplace le restaurant vesuvio.
Ltrlg (2025-10-31 16:40:47+00:00): Merci, j’ai donc déplacé les informations sur l’emplacement de l’ancien restaurant.
norgis (2025-11-21 11:42:27+00:00): Why did you remove this bridge? It is still physically there, so it should be in the map.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173879481
Nar_ach (2025-11-21 17:07:51+00:00): Hi norgis, 

Instead of deleting an object, I should have updated its classification and tag as a path instead. The bridge is clearly visible. Changeset reverted and the roads are classified as paths. Please let me know it is OK with you too.
Ccwc Services (Tom Brophy) (2025-10-28 11:54:24+00:00): There are units in E6, E6 appears to be the block
kitto33 (2025-11-13 08:01:56+00:00): Elmira, thank you for your contribution. Your change removing toll:hov and adding toll:hov:conditional implies that vehicles meeting the current HOV minimum still have to pay tolls outside of the HOV-exclusive times of (Mo-Fr 06:30-08:00,16:30-18:00). I don't think this is the case. HOV vehicles (3+ during Mo-Fr 06:30-08:00 and 2+ all other times, including weekends) never have to pay tolls in the express lane, according to "How much does it cost to use the express lanes?" in https://www.ridemetro.org/riding-metro/hov-hot-express-lanes. My previous tag toll:hov=no fully described this behavior.
elmira_lyft (2025-11-14 16:55:26+00:00): Hi, kitto33!

My name is Elmira, and I’m a mapper in the OSM team at Lyft.
Thanks so much for taking the time to review my changeset and for your detailed feedback on the toll:hov tagging!

You are absolutely right that HOV vehicles (meeting the required minimum) do not have to pay tolls during the HOV-exclusive periods (Mo-Fr 06:30-08:00 and 16:30-18:00).

However, after checking all the rules for Hwy. 290 Express Lanes in https://www.ridemetro.org/riding-metro/hov-hot-express-lanes, I found a couple of specific conditions that the simple toll:hov=no tag doesn't fully cover:
- Weekdays (Outside HOV-Exclusive Times): When the lanes are open to single-occupant vehicles, HOV-qualified vehicles (2+/3+ people) are allowed to use the lane but are still required to pay a toll.
- Weekdays (HOV-Exclusive Times): HOV-qualified vehicles (2+/3+ people) are allowed to use the lane free.
- Weekends (Saturday/Sunday): On Saturdays and Sundays, all vehicles are allowed to use the lanes for a $1.00 toll. The HOV-only requirements do not apply, and even vehicles with 2+ or 3+ occupants must pay the weekend toll.

Because HOV vehicles must pay a toll outside of the peak-time HOV-exclusive windows, the simple toll:hov=no is not fully correct. Therefore, the tag toll:hov:conditional=no @ (Mo-Fr 06:30-08:00,16:30-18:00), that I applied, more accurately reflects that HOV vehicles only get free access during the specific peak times, and are expected to pay (like all other vehicles) during off-peak and weekend operation hours. Does this approach sound reasonable for you?

We really appreciate your comments and helping us ensure these tags are as accurate as possible! If you have any further questions or concerns about these changes, please don't hesitate to let me know.

Best regards, Elmira
kitto33 (2025-11-14 20:10:39+00:00): Hi Elmira, thanks for your careful attention to this issue. Unfortunately, I think you are still partly mistaken. Please see the following image from Mapillary (a street-level imagery source who has given OpenStreetMap permission to use its images in improving OSM): https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=284044510080651&focus=photo&lat=29.93351099999998&lng=-95.646029&z=18.398531005710502&x=0.49249642090185536&y=0.47767376548165447&zoom=0

If you go to '...' (image options) and then 'advanced', it shows the image was taken at 10:09am on Wednesday, December 11, 2019. On the left of the image, there is an electronic pricing sign for the express lane, which shows the current prices for single-occupant vehicles - $1.00, which corresponds to the current information on the website for 10:00am, and FREE, for 2+ HOV vehicles. This sign confirms that 2+ HOV vehicles do not have to pay a toll outside of the HOV-exclusive period, at least for weekdays, as of 2019. (Are you aware of any changes to this condition since 2019?)

However, I believe I was wrong and you are correct about weekends - all vehicles, HOV or not, must pay a $1.00 toll on Saturday and Sunday.

Based on our findings, I would suggest not restoring my previous tag toll:hov=no, but rather modifying yours to toll:hov:conditional=no @ (Mo-Fr). Does this seem okay to you?
elmira_lyft (2025-11-19 09:24:41+00:00): Hi, kitto33!

Thank you again for your very careful attention to this tagging issue and for sharing the Mapillary evidence! That image, along with the detailed analysis of the weekend rules, was exactly what we needed to finalize the tagging.
We are glad we were able to fully reconcile the rules for both weekdays and weekends. We agree that the appropriate tag is the modified conditional tag you proposed: toll:hov:conditional=no @ (Mo-Fr).

We have already implemented this change in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174849037. Your thorough review process ensures the data is as accurate as possible for all OSM users.

We really appreciate your comments and partnership in improving the map!

Best regards, Elmira.
kitto33 (2025-11-19 12:12:02+00:00): Elmira, thank you for understanding and working together.

I noticed another issue with your change. Shortening the motor_vehicle:conditional key as you did may have been better for clarity, but I realized that the new value of the key results in single-occupant vehicles no longer being denied access during the HOV-exclusive hours of Mo-Fr 06:30-08:00,16:30-18:00. The value of this tag should be motor_vehicle:conditional=yes @ (Mo-Fr 05:00-06:30,08:00-11:00,13:00-16:30,18:00-20:00; PH off). hov=* is considered a subset of motor_vehicle=* and overrides the value inherited from motor_vehicle:conditional for just HOVs and just for the times specified in hov:conditional, and does not imply anything about non-HOV vehicles, so the restriction against motor_vehicles must be explicitly stated in the motor_vehicle tag.

Also, hov:conditional must be modified to say hov:conditional=designated @ (Mo-Fr 06:30-08:00,16:30-18:00; PH off). Without PH off, the tag would mean that hov vehicles are allowed during Mo-Fr 06:30-08:00,16:30-18:00, even during holidays when the lane is completely closed.

I imagine the express lanes for I-45 and I-69/US 59 need similar changes to what we discussed for US 290. Thanks for your continued diligence.
elmira_lyft (2025-12-08 17:06:43+00:00): Hi, kitto33!

Please accept my apologies for the delay in responding.
Thank you for pointing out that error. We agree with your finding and will be correcting this on all relevant Express Lanes as soon as possible!
We appreciate your continued help in keeping the map accurate.

Best regards, Elmira
elmira_lyft (2025-12-17 16:46:26+00:00): Hi, kitto33,

Thank you for your patience while we worked on these updates. 

We have now implemented the changes based on your suggestions to ensure full accuracy across all highways. The tags have been updated in the following changesets:

US 290: changesets https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175237361, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175837941;

I-45: changesets https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175236989, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175790124;

I-69/US-59: changesets https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175194684, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175837658.

We really appreciate your collaboration and help in getting these details right!

Best regards, Elmira
GeorgeKaplan (2025-10-31 06:30:01+00:00): Bonjour, attention vous avez glissé sur https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1036659113#map=17/49.406076/1.169132&layers=N
aharvey (2025-10-28 23:52:39+00:00): unless you have specific local knowledge or survey I think best to leave them apart as different structures, but eitherway the original way should have been retained https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history
aharvey (2025-10-28 23:53:40+00:00): because of this I've reverted this change.
ChrisCopsey (2025-12-22 11:15:44+00:00): Every single change in this changeset is a degradation of what was there before.  Private roads converted to residential roads, driveways added where they don't actually exist.  Roads deleted then re-added in less accurate positions.  This needs reverting wholesale.
Frank Peng (2025-12-19 07:49:39+00:00): Please don't tag motorway links that are actually one-way as not one way. Those motorway links or freeway ramps are clearly one-way.
ManuelB701 (2025-10-28 15:32:49+00:00): Adressnamen werden in OSM übrigens i.d.R. nicht abgekürzt, insbesondere, weil man mit SC ja auch Straßen antippen kann, um die Straße einer Adresse zu setzen.
AndyB_66 (2025-11-02 17:59:26+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
TrickyFoxy (2025-10-28 14:06:05+00:00): Не дублируйте точки. Карты в Maps.me обновляются в течение месяца
AndyB_66 (2025-11-02 17:59:19+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
Dimitar155 (2025-11-06 16:40:35+00:00): Пешеходна улица е Витошка. Тротоара е по-скоро highway=footway + footway=sidewalk :)
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-28 13:42:39+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13264897271

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-28 16:44:11+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13264897271

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-28 17:14:09+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13264897271

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-28 21:43:59+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13264897271

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-28 21:54:03+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13264897271

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-28 22:03:56+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13264897271

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-28 22:23:49+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13264897271

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀