piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Sébastien Pi (2025-12-08 21:10:58+00:00): Bonsoir,

Quand je regarde le wiki anglais : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Harbour
J’ai l’impression que landuse=harbour est la valeur adaptée ici.
Vous pensez quoi de « Port du Grand Large » visible sur le site officiel et https://www.sea-seek.com/images/2012/5/dunkerque-g-large.jpg ?
Il a un contour plus important. Et je suis d’accord avec vous sur le fait que le chemin actuel semble trop restrictif.
Kurt PM Lapere (2025-12-10 12:22:52+00:00): Bonjour.  « Port d’échouage » se trouve dans l'image du côté gauche de l'écran du site https://skipper.adac.de/marina/port-du-grand-large?bounds=50.96446,2.23790-51.12775,2.63343. 
Mais je suis d'accord avec « Port du Grand Large ». 
Merci pour la correction.
Sébastien Pi (2025-12-10 22:01:25+00:00): Je n’avais pas vu. Site qui écrit « Nouvell Rue Militaire » et dit que le « Kontact » de Port du Grand Large est dans cette rue. Indique le lien https://www.dunkerque-marina.com/index.php?lang=en qui est en erreur. Je crois qu’il y a trop d’erreurs dessus pour être une source fiable.
Et la carte qu’il présente à droite est un fond OSM (donc a priori avec les données récentes sur OSM).

Je vais faire la modification. Merci pour vos remarques.
Myazyk (2025-06-12 15:46:20+00:00): Чому ти зробив частину вулиці Грушевського з одностороннім рухом?
trial (2025-03-24 21:23:37+00:00): Salut Christian, tu as l'air d'avoir mélangé water et waterway, ça devrait être water et du coup WaterWayMap râle :
https://waterwaymap.org/loops/#map=18.34/48.535619/-4.665461
Je te laisse corriger ?
ChRogel (2025-03-30 16:27:14+00:00): VCorrection faite.
Omnific (2025-03-17 22:43:18+00:00): Hey, thanks a lot for your edits, and welcome to OSM! One note: please be careful about adding things that are already on the map. McPhee's Grocery and Erickson Park were both already on the map. In that case, just edit the existing business/location, rather than drawing a duplication. Thanks, and let me know if you have questions!
user_5359 (2025-03-18 15:12:21+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/12674363317. What is the mean of the tags 
Arquitecta = Arq. Ana Villanueva
abogado = lic. Powell Flores
Please use (british) english for the keys.
yrtimiD (2025-03-27 21:03:07+00:00): when you map steps, I think it's more correct to mark them with include=up/down and only the steps end should have a different layer than 0.
in general layer is useful when there are crossing items on different heights (e.g. bridge and road under).
yrtimiD (2025-03-27 21:05:46+00:00): and again, regarding highway=path, please see mapped things around as examples. if something feels wrong - you can contact person who originally mapped them and ask. 
in most cases these are highway=footway + bicycle=yes
eerib (2025-03-18 17:37:52+00:00): Are you sure this trail is the Jerk de Soleil trail?

There is a sign part way down the trail that is hung in the trees that says "Pickle Rick".

Photo: https://imgur.com/a/HfPdfkA
CYPRESSMTB (2025-03-18 18:12:31+00:00): I will confirm asap. I have not seen that PR sign but there is a Jerk sign about 200 feet into the trail. I will confirm.
eerib (2025-03-20 19:18:11+00:00): Here is a 3D photo taken at 49.3626781, -123.2410096, in which the "Pickle Rick" sign is visible. Hopefully this helps with the confirmation.

https://maps.app.goo.gl/S8Sxds8uQHoHnf6r8
CYPRESSMTB (2025-03-20 21:40:22+00:00): Visited the site today and the builder (Pickle Rick) put his name on one side of the sign and the name of the trail (Jerk de Soleil) on the other. Recommend we keep labeled as JdS.
eerib (2025-03-20 21:45:32+00:00): Thank you for the clarification.
s777n (2025-04-04 20:25:36+00:00): Здравствуйте. Когда идет нумерация домов по микрорайону или поселку то она добавляется не в addr:street а в addr:place. И желательно чтобы она совпадала с именем  в точке place. Исправлено
s777n (2025-04-04 20:36:27+00:00): Здравствуйте.  Вы удалили пристройку с адресом 25 к1. Будьте внимательней пожалуйста. Исправлено
s777n (2025-04-04 21:05:55+00:00): Здравствуйте. Вы зря заменили building:part на building. Это часть здания само здание отмечено здесь - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/35401132 Исправлено
NeisReview (2025-03-18 07:25:42+00:00): #UnexplainedChanges #Test

Hello, welcome to OSM.

Could you please clarify the purpose behind your map changes? It's not entirely clear from the edited data and your added description. Also, what was used as a source of your activity?

Looking forward to your response. 
Thank you.
NeisRevert (2025-03-21 20:52:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/163924163 where the changeset comment is: 
Remove vandalism
TrickyFoxy (2025-03-18 21:55:28+00:00): 👋 Кажется информацию количесвте жителей бесполезно вносить, потому что её невозможно проверить. И какой у вас истоник этой информации?
Haritron (2025-03-18 17:41:20+00:00): Correction: Added Omar Muhsin Street based on Maps feedback near Abou Al Nemres City, Om Khnan Village Road #adt
tastrax (2025-03-22 10:04:32+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, +61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features#Phone_Numbers .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
Audrey_Dritte (2025-03-23 12:01:59+00:00): Ah sorry, I do know better, thank you for both catching this and the reminder!
b-jazz (2025-03-19 16:25:13+00:00): Hey there Thockey, 
On hole #5, it's probably best just to join the fairway and the green together and share nodes between them since there isn't a clear break between the two. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls for examples of how to map them. Thanks.
NeisReview (2025-03-18 07:24:11+00:00): #UnexplainedChanges #Test

Hello, welcome to OSM.

Could you please clarify the purpose behind your map changes? It's not entirely clear from the edited data and your added description. Also, what was used as a source of your activity?

Looking forward to your response. 
Thank you.
NeisRevert (2025-03-21 20:52:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/163924176 where the changeset comment is: 
Remove vandalism
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-10 09:25:31+00:00): Just FYI--the description is blatantly promotional SEO spam, which should just be removed on sight rather than copied to a valid tag which just gives it much more exposure. See https://osm.wiki/Spam#SEO_Spam and https://osm.wiki/description#No_advertising . I went ahead and did so in changeset 183913009

https://osm.org/changeset/183913009
ChrissW-R1 (2026-06-10 20:10:13+00:00): Thanks for your work and the information. It stands to reason that the description is not relevant to OpenStreetMap.

I will take this information into account in future revisions.

The phone number way changed again by me, because our both formats are not correct. ;)

https://osm.org/changeset/183942256
CAM-Gerlach (2026-06-10 23:45:57+00:00): Thanks! Oops, I missed the other dash as I don't have my NANP phone number validators/autofixers enabled in my Revert profile in JOSM since I clean up SEO spam all over the world. However, it is _still_ not quite correct, actually 😅. I used to use `+1 NNN-NNN-NNNN` myself because it was mentioned on a wiki page and it was (accordingly) the default for the JOSM phone number plugin, but it turned out that wiki mention was just one mapper misinterpreting the consensus of an old discussion, and last year the wiki was updated to reflect the actual consensus of that discussion for `+1-NNN-NNN-NNNN` https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone#United_States , and that is what most tools use/enforce now (e.g. confusedbuffalo's site and bot, watmelon's JOSM validators/autofixers, etc; JOSM phone number plugin hasn't released a new update yet). See also the canonical community discussion https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/phone-tag-formatting-in-the-us-1-nxx-nxx-xxxx-vs-1-nxx-nxx-xxxx-vs/104117 and specifically https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/proposed-automated-edit-of-phone-numbers-in-the-usa/138163/53
CAM-Gerlach (2026-06-10 23:50:45+00:00): That said, I don't go around changing it willy nilly unless I'm already editing a POI for other more substantive reasons, usually cause my autofixer catches it. So probably not worth another changeset here unless you really want.
GinaroZ (2025-03-28 19:33:14+00:00): Presumably this is no longer a grass area?
無限の刃 (2025-03-18 01:56:21+00:00): この編集には、国土地理院標準地図も使用した。
dankarran (2025-03-18 13:17:30+00:00): It looks like you accidentally dragged a node near Royal Victoria - now fixed up in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163774765
dankarran (2025-03-18 13:21:01+00:00): Another one fixed up - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163774982
pfhllnts (2025-03-18 13:27:02+00:00): Oops! Thank you for looking out and fixing it!
dankarran (2025-03-18 14:57:40+00:00): No worries, these things happen. I guess just try to remember to check the warnings in iD when saving ;)
pfhllnts (2025-03-18 15:03:11+00:00): I think the problem there is that iD always shows all existing warnings, not just ones I introduced myself, but let me check back at the next edit.
NeisBot (2025-03-18 02:21:34+00:00): Hi aydonmill, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 80% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 6 natural(s)
- 3 landuse(')

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=163756089
NeisReview (2025-03-21 19:59:31+00:00): #golf #mapping
NeisReview (2025-03-18 07:26:07+00:00): #UnexplainedChanges #Test

Hello, welcome to OSM.

Could you please clarify the purpose behind your map changes? It's not entirely clear from the edited data and your added description. Also, what was used as a source of your activity?

Looking forward to your response. 
Thank you.
NeisRevert (2025-03-28 20:26:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/164225623 where the changeset comment is: 
Remove testdata
NeisBot (2025-03-18 02:47:34+00:00): Hi aydonmill, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 91% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 4 natural(s)
- 8 landuse(')

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=163756512
NeisReview (2025-03-21 20:02:00+00:00): #golf #mapping
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-06 04:30:45+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164574320
b-jazz (2025-04-27 18:15:08+00:00): You might want to read up on multipolygons and look at other examples of large multipolygons that are made up of several segments that define outer boundaries. (You should also consider using better tools to map multipolygon relations than iD. JOSM would be a good choice.)
Baloo Uriza (2025-03-18 15:49:23+00:00): This should probably be ref=PR 20, noname=yes.  Refs aren't names.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163758549
democat (2025-03-19 06:30:43+00:00): As far as I'm aware, it is actually called Park Road 20 in Grayson County's GIS maps. Plus, the name was Park Road 20 prior
Baloo Uriza (2025-03-20 13:09:10+00:00): Yes, TIGER imported everything with names and not refs, so that tracks, however, it's also acknowledged that it wasn't a very good import, in part and among other reasons, because the TIGER data didn't have a concept of ref.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163758549
Константин Гам (2025-04-09 08:22:58+00:00): А вы уверены что на местности стройка убрана? Есть фото с местности? 3 недели назад, было перекрыто, ездил мимо.
Константин Гам (2025-04-09 08:25:40+00:00): По внешним источникам, открытие не подтверждается. Очень жду от вас пруф-фото.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-06 04:30:46+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164574320
Константин Гам (2025-04-09 08:24:12+00:00): Здесь не проезда нет, а в общем, доступ ограничен. Исправил.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-17 00:01:23+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165049590
Константин Гам (2025-04-09 08:22:01+00:00): Здесь есть проезд и нет запретов, пожалуйста не вносите свои фантазии в карту!
Константин Гам (2025-04-09 08:21:04+00:00): Здравствуйте! 
Давайте не вносить в карту фантазии, административные ограничения движения начинаются после начала территории.
Langlaeufer (2025-03-18 06:39:29+00:00): Hi, bus only is bus=yes, psv includes taxi.
NeisBot (2025-03-18 07:12:40+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was flagged because your added description contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment
NeisReview (2025-03-21 20:02:58+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/163922710
TrickyFoxy (2025-03-18 19:12:28+00:00): 👋 Используйте для стрелок тег railway=switch. В поиске по слову «стрелка» можно найти
BaboucheVerte (2026-07-22 09:49:54+00:00): Hi, why did you add access=no ? It's perfectly legal to go, no access restriction.
pavvv (2025-03-18 08:03:00+00:00): Dzięki za edycję!
Kilka uwag:
- kiedy nie ma fizycznego rozdzielenia, to nie mapujemy kolejnej linii https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1368626377
k
- kiedy na drodze jest tylko jeden pas, to tagujemy turn=* zamiast turn:lanes=* https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/83872280
pavvv (2025-03-18 08:06:51+00:00): Na tym zjeździe rzeczywiście jest kilka pachołków, ale moim zdaniem lepiej będzie zmapować to jedną linią.
Nequit (2025-03-18 08:30:09+00:00): Dzięki za wskazówki.
Zmieniłem tag na turn:right oraz usunąłem drogę do C.H. Korona. Zamiast tego dodałem pas do skrętu w prawo.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163762982
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163762810
NeisBot (2025-03-18 07:45:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was flagged because your added description contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2025-03-21 20:03:41+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/163922721
bxl-forever (2025-03-18 09:00:56+00:00): Hello, matthiouOSM,

Your "no comment" upload of this morning created some astonishment here.

Adding a drinking fountain is okay (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12675630702).

However, in this edit, you also modified the shape of several buildings in another neighbourhood.

Either it was a mistake when using your app for the first time, or you genuinely wanted to "help" us and "fix" those buildings.  If this is the case, please don’t do this.  Tracing buildings is a complicated process and the only way to do it correctly is by using UrbIS numerical imagery; we never draw buildings from aerial pictures because those images are distorted and would make buildings move every year.

I’ve just finished restoring all the damaged buildings.

Have a nice day.
matthiouOSM (2025-03-18 09:09:41+00:00): Hello, 

I am terribly sorry about damaging some buildings. Indeed I wanted to fix them but your explanation makes total sense. 

The drinking fountain is real — I had not realised all my edits would be uploaded as one. 

Thanks for teaching me new stuff
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-05 05:28:10+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164536171
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-07 06:38:50+00:00): DWG revert - poor quality mapping

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164618287
StC (2025-03-18 19:45:02+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changeset a brisé la continuité du Chemin d'Amadour qui passe par là. Je tente la réparation.
habi (2025-03-18 09:59:28+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163766470 gehört noch hier dazu, womit ich die 'alte' Touristinfo mit 'deiner neuen' zusammengeführt habe.
Piagno (2025-03-18 10:22:01+00:00): Ja habe die Notiz leider in der falschen Reihenfolge bearbeitet... ist mir dann auch aufgefallen xd. Die Notiz am alten Ort konnte ich (zeitlich) noch nicht bearbeiten.
habi (2025-03-18 20:51:34+00:00): > Die Notiz am alten Ort konnte ich (zeitlich) noch nicht bearbeiten.

Kein Stress, wir sind ja alle freiwillig hier :)
Vinber-Pro (2025-03-18 16:37:38+00:00): Bonjour,
je ne suis pas sur de comprendre ce que vous avez fait ?
Il y a une discussion sur le forum concernant un pneumologue présent ici https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/demande-de-suppression-de-coordonnees/31915

est-ce que vous confirmez qu'il n'y a plus de pneumologue ?

Concernant vos commentaires de changesets, le fait de très souvent écrire "Mise en conformité" rend difficile la compréhension de ce que vous faites ? Je me permet de vous signaler https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bons_commentaires_de_groupe_de_modifications

Bonne cartographie
旧加卷 (2025-04-08 17:19:12+00:00): Hello. Please refer to the notes of the modified relations.
Руслан Т (2025-04-09 14:46:57+00:00): Hello, ok. Thanks!
ivanbranco (2025-03-23 10:17:08+00:00): Ciao datamove, questi non sono i nomi delle vie (che non hanno nome), sono i nomi delle località, già correttamente mappate come elementi place=*.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-29 09:59:30+00:00): reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173920511
NorthCrab_upload (2025-03-18 09:00:58+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12675780785

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
kmpoppe_repair (2025-04-10 11:24:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 164763734 where the changeset comment is: Reverting undiscussed mass edits to shops in Germany that add mostly incorrect addresses
kmpoppe_repair (2025-04-10 11:25:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 164763734 where the changeset comment is: Reverting undiscussed mass edits to shops in Germany that add mostly incorrect addresses
fs_LT (2026-02-09 14:39:09+00:00): da ist jetzt jedenfalls Chaos weil den 1. Track (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/323668229) gibt es seit 11 Jahren und den 2. neu gezeichneten (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1368648073) seit 11 Monaten;
siehe auch https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166014910
Und was soll "Vom Tscheyeck nach Nauders" sein, eine Abfahrt, denn eine Skitour abwärts gibt es nicht
NorthCrab_upload (2025-03-18 09:20:54+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12675780785

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
kmpoppe_repair (2025-04-10 11:25:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 164763734 where the changeset comment is: Reverting undiscussed mass edits to shops in Germany that add mostly incorrect addresses
Rouyki (2025-03-18 19:09:56+00:00): Why was only the KK Park? Only know about KK Park? It is Scam Factory. These are spread along the Moei River in Myawaddy. Google it
Rouyki (2025-03-18 19:15:45+00:00): A new account？ Repeatedly deleting and only deleting the name of KK Park—people from park？
Rouyki (2025-03-18 19:35:27+00:00): Seriously speaking, these are criminal organizations that threaten the personal safety of Chinese citizens. The markings have been there for a long time, and they are marked precisely because they are criminal organizations.

If you are aware of the telecom scams originating from Southeast Asia and targeting people worldwide, this should not be unfamiliar to you. If not, take the time to google it. China, together with Southeast Asian countries, is cracking down on them.

If you have ulterior motives, I'm ready.
kmpoppe_repair (2025-04-10 11:25:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 164763734 where the changeset comment is: Reverting undiscussed mass edits to shops in Germany that add mostly incorrect addresses
ika-chan! (2025-04-21 10:01:13+00:00): You actually made the tracks worse than it is in reality. I had to revert it because it broke everything.
JeroenHoek (2025-03-18 19:29:30+00:00): Welk forum? Dit is de Harlingerstraatweg vanaf de Koningsbrug naar Midlum.

https://app.pdok.nl/viewer/#x=158966.32&y=576957.82&z=11.6600&background=BRT-A%20standaard&layers=
chris66 (2025-03-18 20:46:40+00:00): https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/harlingerstraatweg-harlingen/127547
MKnight (2025-05-11 19:55:51+00:00): Zur Kenntnisnahme: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166106216
literan (2025-03-20 20:04:26+00:00): там нет скальных обрывов
Harfeur (2025-03-25 22:00:21+00:00): Bonjour, les villes de Bellegarde-sur-Valserine et Chatillon-en-Michaille ont fusionné pour donner Valserhone. Pourquoi avoir supprimé Valserhone ?
Harfeur (2025-03-25 22:14:35+00:00): PS : Je me suis permis de corriger les relations Valserhone pour bien faire apparaitre Valserhone : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164099196

Il est important de considérer que Valserhone et Bellegarde sont différents. Les panneaux de ville indiquent bien : Bellegarde, commune de Valserhone.
Gnafron (2025-03-25 22:28:25+00:00): Bonsoir,
Je me suis permis de supprimer le nœud place=town Valserhône, car Valserhône n'est pas une ville au sens géographique (une agglomération bâtie), mais simplement une commune administrative. Rajouter un nœud spécifique Valserhône revient à taguer pour le rendu, car sur le terrain, il n'y a pas de ville Valserhône, mais bien plusieurs villes ou bourgs portant chacun leur nom, tous appartenant administrativement à la commune de Valserhône.
Harfeur (2025-03-26 17:57:56+00:00): Il y a plein de petits villages qui incluent Valserhone, mais qui sont pas précis : En Manant, Pierre-Blanche... On fait pareil pour eux ? Sachant que tu rentres à En Manant (panneau rouge de ville) et tu sors à Bellegarde....