piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
silversurfer83 (2023-07-11 18:10:18+00:00): Moin :)
ich möchte dich an dieser Stelle noch einmal nach der Quelle deiner Information fragen.

Einfach auf diese Mail antworten, danke

silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138385623
eggie (2023-07-11 16:08:35+00:00): Beste CS   Hoe kan nu een adres meeverhuizen? Apotheek de Singel was hier al getagd. Ik zal het oude adres herstellen.
MVG
mvg
eggie
eggie (2023-07-11 16:13:59+00:00): Apotheekinfo samengevoegd...  Adres Singel hersteld.
mapko (2023-07-12 21:06:51+00:00): spravny postreh. este by to nemalo mat tag highway=construction
Filip009 (2023-07-12 21:12:09+00:00): Len na YouTube ministerstva dopravy hovoria, že prieskum archeologický a kontrola na bomby, stavba prístupových ciest sa začína podpisom zmluvy, takže niečo sa tam robiť začne, takže teoreticky to možno už aj môže byť construction. Práve preto som to tak aj nechal.
mapko (2023-07-12 21:18:11+00:00): bolo by fajn aby tam aspon trochu kopli do zeme... nechaj tak ;)
Lancelotance (2023-07-11 15:40:11+00:00): 邵阳县站
NorthCrab_upload (2023-07-11 15:50:16+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11039990495

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2023-07-11 15:50:15+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, zamień addr:place na addr:city. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/375550862

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
silversurfer83 (2023-07-11 16:47:16+00:00): Hi,

here https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/688501529/history you can see that there already is a kneipp cure in the database. I'll remove your POI since it really looks like a double entry.

Cheers
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138386233
Meskalin (2023-07-20 12:16:03+00:00): Sorry - Thanks!
mavl (2023-07-15 17:04:10+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: incompatible source.
adrianojbr (2023-07-11 20:37:15+00:00): Olá, Bortolini D!

Essa praça já existe?

Nas imagens de satélite disponíveis ainda não aparece nada.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138387073
Bortolini D (2023-07-14 12:34:12+00:00): Olá,
esta é uma área que atualizada segundo projeto do loteamento, a quadra é destinada para área institucional.
adrianojbr (2023-07-14 12:50:11+00:00): A praça existe ou não?

Há opção de incluir como proposed ou construction dependendo da situação.
eggie (2023-07-11 19:39:43+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
APneunzehn74 (2023-07-16 20:51:14+00:00): Hallo hier an dieser Stelle sind jetzt zwei Trinkwasser Stellen eingetragen. Ist das so korrekt? Außerdem wage ich zu bezweifeln das der name:en so in Ordnung ist.
Grüße APneunzehn74
Ruppsn (2023-07-21 08:44:57+00:00): Danke fürs aufmerksam machen. Die OSM Skills waren da noch nicht so gut.
APneunzehn74 (2023-07-21 08:50:13+00:00): Bitte kein Problem.
Grüße Andreas
multimodaal (2023-07-22 19:21:55+00:00): Hoi, je hebt hier -naast een aantal prima wijzigingen- ook meerdere waterway=canal vervangen door waterway=river , terwijl het boezemvaarten betreft. Daar is river incorrect want het zijn (in ieder geval nu) afwateringskanalen in een afgesloten man_made watersysteem die niet voldoen aan de definitie "A river is a natural flowing watercourse, usually freshwater, flowing towards an ocean, sea, lake or another river".zoals opgenomen in 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Rivers

Het water hier stroomt niet vrij naar de zee, ook omdat het onder zeeniveau ligt. Of en in welke richting het water stroomt is afhankelijk van de vraag of de verschillende boezemgemalen het water omhoogpompen.

Wil je die canal-waarden terugzetten ajb? 
Dank alvast (-: 

Een deel van deze vaarten was vele eeuwen geleden wel een rivier of getijdebeek, daar zou eventueel wel een historic-tag oid kunnen worden toegevoegd.

Groet!
Friendly_Ghost (2023-07-22 20:25:15+00:00): Bedankt voor het meekijken. Ik geloof dat je het hebt over de Kromme Mijdrecht. Deze wordt op Wikipedia en op https://www.agv.nl/recreatie/watererfgoed/rivieren/kromme-mijdrecht/ als rivier omschreven en hij meandert ook, wat atypisch is voor kanalen. Het zakken van de rivier heeft hoogstwaarschijnlijk met het bemalen te maken.

De water_system=boezem tag heb ik laten staan, dus als je interesse hebt in het opzoeken van boezemvaarten is dit nog steeds probleemloos mogelijk.

Omdat ik dit toch al aan het nalopen was heb ik https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138870397 ontdekt en aangepast naar waterway=canal.
hivernet (2023-07-11 16:39:02+00:00): This is my first edit. Please review if syntax is correct.
J-D-R (2023-07-11 17:02:22+00:00): Should have been a supermarket
eggie (2023-07-11 19:28:17+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback   Het gebouw en de parkeerplaats ontbreken nog zie ik.
Nieuwbouw wordt geïmporteerd op verzoek. Zie dit draadje op het forum van OSM.
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/bag-importverzoeken/3394/1081

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-07-11 19:36:26+00:00): BAG importverzoek gedaan
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/bag-importverzoeken/3394/1080
Parkeerplaats ingetekend mbv de laatste PDOK luchtfoto.

Groet
eggie
eggie (2023-07-11 20:44:48+00:00): Tagging aangepast naar supermarkt
eggie (2023-07-12 05:52:53+00:00): Winkelpand is geïmporteerd.
literan (2023-07-11 17:14:31+00:00): it's vandal edit. Revert
CurlingMan13 (2023-07-12 02:02:15+00:00): Reverting changeset since access tags should be used instead of deleting the ways.

Read more here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138401033
CurlingMan13 (2023-07-12 02:01:35+00:00): Reverting changeset since access tags should be used instead of deleting the ways.

Read more here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

Do not re-delete features.  This has already been discussed in your previous changesets, such as:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137812590

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138401025
NorthCrab_upload (2023-07-11 17:20:14+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11040122854

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
woodpeck_repair (2023-07-19 04:40:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 138572761, 138689811, 138508386, 138530263, 138563870, 138448306, 138443626, 138466177, 138673696, 138693058, 138440582, 138542403, 138629671, 138550049, 138652256, 138589059, 138557129, 138517151, 138561813, 138663307, 138534828, 138642375, 138596063, 138457462, 138524112, 138498769, 138528151, 138610429, 138683125, 138580314, 138474443, 138489449, 138620352, 138637713, 138481813, 138485141, 138645544, 138599143, 138602442, 138566415 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed name changes in Ukraine, see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/topic/100629/25
Drahtochse (2024-04-10 19:14:35+00:00): Hi,

durch die Änderungen hier wurden leider die Wanderwege K, L X5, X8 und Wanderweg der deutschen Einheit "auseinandergerissen" und statt zwei Wege etwas zu verlängern (Way 236515427 z.b), zwei kleine attributslose Neue erstellt.

Ich fixe das in Kürze, es wäre aber schön, wenn du das in Zukunft beachtest. JOSM z.B. warnt idR. vor solchen Änderungen, wenn sie Auswirkungen auf andere Relationen/Ways haben.

Besten Gruß,
Drahtochse
HellMap (2023-07-11 19:37:21+00:00): Hi,

Can you please explain your last two edits and what exactly you meant to add.

How can there be a florist shop in the middle of forest?

And how is there a park area in a random forest location with an English name?

Thanks
zltigo (2023-07-13 06:58:34+00:00): Hello,
Both last two edits had been made only for my needs to remember the locations for future visits. Or simply a pin on the map. I just could not find corresponding categories in the provided list that would best match the locations. So I used the closest by meaning. 

The florist shop - is a location with wild forest flowers and yes it is in the middle of forest.
The park area - location of an abandoned garden that has apple and cherry treas still growing there (not giving fruit sadly) along side with some berry bushes and other garden plants. And it also is in the forest.

Best regards
HellMap (2023-07-13 09:30:38+00:00): Hello again,

Unfortunately, you cannot use OpenStreetMap directly for personal notes or locations. The data from the map is visible to everyone and used by many maps and applications. For example, someone looking for a florist shop will find this location. So you should only add correctly specified/tagged objects. At this time, OSM does not tag flower patches and most historical features, so I cannot suggest any replacements. It's always possible to add new custom tags, but they wouldn't show up on the map anyway.

If you want to use OSM as a base map for personal notes, there are various websites and apps that can do similar functionality, for example https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/
Vinber-Pro (2023-07-12 15:30:41+00:00): bonjour,
n'est-il pas préférable d'utiliser amenity=doctors ? plutôt que clinic ?
eggie (2023-07-11 18:40:34+00:00): Hier dus parking=street_side
orientation=perpendicular

Dan worden de P's ook minder prominent weergegeven dan reguliere parkeerterreinen.
MVG
eggie
Udarian (2023-07-13 06:08:35+00:00): why did you remove all these roads, from what I can tell they are all still there (they are visible on the latest imagery).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138389912
Udarian (2023-07-14 20:38:09+00:00): please respond
Udarian (2023-07-15 20:26:46+00:00): please provide a source for these deletions
Udarian (2023-08-01 01:39:21+00:00): I have left multiple comments asking you what the source of the deletions are and you have been unresponsive. since from what I can tell these features still exist I have had to revert this commit

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139276928
Langlaeufer (2023-07-12 09:02:40+00:00): Hi streetuser,
falls es kein Versehen war - Leitplanken sind gerichtet. Die rechte Seite (Zeichenrichtung) ist die glatte Seite die normalerweise zur Fahrbahn weißst. in ID ist die glatte Seite mit den Pfeilen versehen.

Grüße und frohes mappen 
Langläufer
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138390087
streetuser (2023-07-12 15:26:54+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis
Frans S (2023-08-11 13:24:04+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings need to be improved to meet the quality standards of HOTOSM.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document for more info)
A: C: Not accurately drawn and squared.
F: Mapping of buildings partly hidden by trees.
G: include the shadow of a building in the mapping.
H: Incorporated the yard or a clearing into the mapping.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138390167
user_5359 (2023-07-12 16:25:04+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Instead of the key "emergency=fire_hydrant" with empty value please use the key "emergency" with the value "fire_hydrant" (no equal sign inside of the key text.

Добро пожаловать в OSM! Вместо ключа "emergency=fire_hydrant" с пустым значением используйте, пожалуйста, ключ "emergency" со значением "fire_hydrant" (без знака равенства внутри текста ключа.
eggie (2023-07-11 18:38:12+00:00): Tip... Tag bij op de adresnode... nr 23?

MVG
eggie
CSVLS (2023-07-11 18:46:48+00:00): Klopt, is privé adres maar ook met autogarage in een dus had de tag aan de voorzijde erbij gezet. Ik ken de garage namelijk
eggie (2023-07-11 18:59:57+00:00): Oke.. wanneer je wilt dat het een adres krijgt kun je de nodes samenvoegen.
Gr eggie
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 22:33:33+00:00): Що ти робиш?
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 22:54:41+00:00): хуєсос
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 23:26:44+00:00): Не гніви Бога! Покайся!
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-31 22:17:37+00:00): тварюка
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-31 22:21:35+00:00): Ти русизми додаєш?
wanlwanflawfnalwfn (2023-07-11 18:00:25+00:00): Ik heb een klein deel van het voetpad veranderd, maar hier op de kaart is het gebied (wat ik veranderd heb) heel groot door het pad wat eraan geconnect zat, maakt dat uit of moet ik dat voortaan vermijden?
eggie (2023-07-11 18:32:26+00:00): Dit is oke... Het komt omdat dat fietspad helemaal doorloopt naar de Helmbergweg. .. en daar zitten je bewerkte voetpaden aan vast.
Je edits
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=138390476

Groet
eggie
eggie (2023-07-11 18:44:35+00:00): Dag Joeri...   Info samengevoegd met de adresnode en aangepast naar childcare..
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-07-11 20:53:19+00:00): Je vraagt feedback.. Lijkt me oke zo.
groet
eggie
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 23:11:22+00:00): уєбень
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 23:26:18+00:00): уєбень
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-31 22:12:34+00:00): не гніви Бога!
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-31 22:19:41+00:00): Не гніви Бога! Покайся!
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-31 22:21:13+00:00): вандал і сволота ти!
empty_child (2023-07-12 10:19:23+00:00): Hello georgian110,
Thank you for the contribution. Please, don't shorten names of street and other objects. Your changeset will be reverted
tux67 (2023-07-13 11:01:35+00:00): Hi  Laachir Deeper,

thanks for the update. There are at least 2 points that need correction here:
- the service_times are in a not recognized format
- the name you entered is not a real name, but a description. It's not accepted to use the name field in this way.

I think this entry (random example from Berlin) shows how this could look like.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6133405743

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_use_name_tag_to_describe_things

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:service_times

BR
tux67
eggie (2023-07-11 18:46:10+00:00): Beter short_name gebruiken. Nu heb je de namen gecombineerd.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:short_name
J-D-R (2023-07-11 19:14:04+00:00): Bedankt. Die optie zat niet in de app, dus daar moet ik nog even naar kijken.
Vinber-Pro (2023-07-25 15:53:39+00:00): qu'est ce que c'est https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11040196985 ?
empty_child (2023-07-12 10:36:05+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/32551837
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 22:37:54+00:00): Будівництво на "стройька" замінив вже?
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 22:46:52+00:00): неугомонний пердун
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 22:51:29+00:00): Гріх!
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 23:10:21+00:00): щоб ти більше свої русизми не пхав на мапи!
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 23:17:04+00:00): не гніви Бога!
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-31 22:20:16+00:00): сволота рідкісна
fkv (2023-07-11 18:32:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138391703 where the changeset comment is: revert 138391107
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 22:39:12+00:00): У тебе є офіційні фото місцевості де написано що місцевість має назву "стройка"?
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 22:56:09+00:00): Люди захищають країніну, а ти додаєш русизми на мапу, сука, військові це побачать і тобі пізда!
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 23:02:53+00:00): уєбень
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 23:08:27+00:00): Заактуалізував дані вже? Усе перевірив? Перевір знову!
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 23:12:35+00:00): Деморалізуєш
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 23:29:25+00:00): сволота рідкісна
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-31 22:13:47+00:00): Тебе ветерани порвуть за, сука, "стройка"!
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-31 22:23:34+00:00): хуєсос
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 22:33:43+00:00): Ти не любиш людей, гівнюк!
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 22:39:38+00:00): що ти твориш...
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 22:46:11+00:00): стройка блять у тебе?
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 23:30:27+00:00): Стройка у тебе в дупі!
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-31 22:20:53+00:00): срань що ти робиш на мапах!
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-31 22:36:29+00:00): засранець
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 22:32:46+00:00): Будівництво на "стройька" замінив вже?
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 22:49:01+00:00): покайся!
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 22:52:31+00:00): Що ти твориш, що за назви!
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 22:57:11+00:00): Що ти робиш?
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 22:58:26+00:00): москальска гнида!
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 23:13:01+00:00): вносиш правки з русизмами?
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 23:26:13+00:00): неугомонний пердун
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-31 22:20:37+00:00): своїми домислами створюєш безлад!
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-31 22:35:58+00:00): Деморалізуєш
MxxCon (2023-07-12 17:24:54+00:00): Hello.
There's really no point mapping "proposed" features. OSM is a map about the world NOW, not how it's going to be at some point in indeterminate future.
Once the construction starts and shoves hit the ground, then it's useful to map that. Otherwise it's imaginary mapping with no use today.
I believe this edit should be reverted.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138391273
kguenther24 (2023-07-12 18:20:30+00:00): Hi,
To my knowledge almost all of this project is under construction and has been for at least a year, save for a short span near Con Ed. It is scheduled to be mostly complete by 2025. The upper part is already complete. Feel free to check on construction updates on the project website.
MxxCon (2023-07-12 18:26:25+00:00): The project is going on, but the features that you mapped here, such as 1188974503, 1188974504, 1188974509 and others do not appear on the imagery with which you mapped and contain proposed=yes tag. Where are those from?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138391273
kguenther24 (2023-07-12 19:03:35+00:00): Correct, those portions of the flood protection system are in the not yet under construction northern portion of East River Park that will start early next year. This is the document that I used that shows all of the walls, levees, and gates: https://www.nyc.gov/assets/escr/downloads/pdf/DDC-f-ESCR-pres-rev-final-given-to-PDC-2020-01-30.pdf

I wanted to do all the tagging work up front now that the design is final so it doesn’t get forgotten. Now in a year or so myself or another mapper only has to delete the proposed/construction tag and it’s done.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138391273
MxxCon (2023-07-12 21:33:57+00:00): Your linked document is called "final review", not the "final approved plan" or whatever terminology they use. And it's intended for general public comments, not actual structural plans based on which things will be positioned and built. 
So we don't know if things will actually be where it shows in the document/where you mapped them.

The chance of someone going in a year or so later and remembering to remove proposed tag is just as high as someone going in 2-3 year later and properly mapping things that would've been built by then.
But in the mean time for 2+ years we have fictional, non-existing features on the map.
kguenther24 (2023-07-12 22:18:40+00:00): I have correctly followed the documented process for proposed features (which there are over 100k instances of) outlined here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:proposed

Here are the most recent documents from June showing the exact same plan that has been proposed for years:
https://www.nyc.gov/assets/escr/downloads/pdf/20230615_ESCR_BMCR_CB3PARKS.pdf
https://www.nyc.gov/assets/escr/downloads/pdf/2023_PA1Approach.pdf

If you really have a problem with a few clearly marked proposed ways, go ahead and delete them, but I am confident I mapped them accurately and with enough detail that little to no work will be required when construction is complete.
MxxCon (2023-07-13 04:52:17+00:00): I'm not saying what you mapped it incorrect to the documents. What I'm saying is that what you mapped might not match what will actually be constructed at indeterminate point in the future.

Regarding proposed tag, in my opinion it doesn't belong on OSM just like all those razed/abondend/whatever railroad tags.
OSM is the map of NOW, not future or past.
jmapb (2026-05-16 19:07:13+00:00): Hi, I've removed the dykes https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1188974503 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1188974504 -- based on survey and imagery, these ways were running right through active parkland. Perhaps the plans changed, if so, this is a good example of why mapping things before they exist can be problematic.
jmapb (2026-05-16 19:07:30+00:00): Sometimes *is* helpful to map currently nonexistent features, if their geometry is actually known. In these cases it's best to use a lifecycle prefix (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix) to ensure the map renderers and other data consumers won't see these features as current real data. Relying on tags like proposed= and start_date= isn't advisable, because you can't assume that data consumers will check for those.
jmapb (2026-05-16 19:11:29+00:00): Finally, I'm really not sure these various flood control measures really merit a relation at all. IMO East Side Coastal Resiliency is a government initiative, not a geographic feature. But I left https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16079502 alone, just deleted these two members.
MxxCon (2026-05-16 19:19:01+00:00): I think that fits with https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations_are_not_categories
> They are meant to model a close (and usually local) relation between objects
> We do not, however, create relations that simply collect a loose group of somewhat related items. We don't do "Footways in East Anglia", we don't do "Scottish Lochs". 
I think relation/16079502 is a type of relation that shouldn't exist.
I'd nuke it.