piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Tatfahren (2025-01-14 19:40:02+00:00): Da weicht die deutsche Version mal wieder von der englischen ab. Die englische sagt, das die Briefkästen häufig direkt neben der Haustür stehen. Außerdem steht in der deutschen Version auch nicht das es verboten wäre (hast du ja auch nie gesagt).

Mir geht es auch nicht darum dich zu kritisieren, du hast nur schnell die falsch getaggten Hausbriefkästen entfernt. Eigentlich müsste ich das dem ursprünglichen Ersteller schreiben. Mache ich das nächste mal wenn ich sehe das er sowas einträgt.


Zitat von dir: "würden wir ja auch jeden Briefkasten an den Grundstücksgrenzen taggem"

Das habe ich in einer Ortschaft bereits umgesetzt: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1XaH
PseudoMortus (2025-07-09 12:37:10+00:00): This restaurant is now closed, forgot to update here. Should I create a new ticket or will this comment suffice?
BCNorwich (2025-01-14 08:48:32+00:00): Hi Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've joined the south end onto Middlesex Road.
felipeeugenio (2025-01-13 21:41:55+00:00): Hola. Por favor tomar datos solo desde fuentes permitidas por nuestro copyright.
Saludos
rempshaener (2025-01-13 16:00:00+00:00): Hallo,
das sieht schon mal gut aus.
Jetzt kannst du noch in iD unter „Eigenschaften“ auf „+“ klicken und „access“, nächste Spalte „private“ eintragen, dann sichern – fertig.

Viele Grüße
Znaika (2025-01-21 08:23:03+00:00): Hallo Mawabue und herzlich willkommen bei OSM.
Auch von mir ein kleiner Hinweis :-)
Die Abkürzungen für Wochentage bei der Öffnungszeiten von der Schneiderei in Englisch.
Mo 10:00-13:00,15:00-18:00; We 10:00-13:00; Th 16:00-18:30; Fr 10:00-13:00; Sa 09:00-12:00
statt
Mo 10:00-13:00, 15:00-18:00; Mi 10:00-13:00; Do 16:00; Fr 10:00-13:00; Sa 09:00-12:00
Gruß, Znaika
DUGA (2025-02-05 18:41:29+00:00): Why do you believe this road is paved?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/818618350/history#map=17/41.180741/-76.365463
Vinzenz Mai (2025-01-16 11:10:04+00:00): Hallo,

Tippfehler bei Gebäude https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/158270287

building=retzail sollte vermutlich eher retail sein :)

Beste Grüße
Vinzenz
Map_HeRo (2025-01-16 16:24:43+00:00): Waas? Retzail ist nicht richtig?!? ... 
Das kommt davon, wenn man zuviele Änderungen auf einen Rutsch noch schnell am späten Abend durchziehen will. Danke für den Hinweis!
smichae (2025-01-13 00:18:40+00:00): Thanks for the addition!  Welcome to OSM!
smichae (2025-01-13 00:26:44+00:00): Careful when moving around the map - sometimes when you click and drag you can accidentally move a point. In this changeset, it looks like the Longfield/Oxford Drive node was accidentally dragged to a different location.  I'll update to correct. No worries, and welcome to mapping!
felipeeugenio (2025-01-13 14:31:06+00:00): Buena Vicente.
No es necesario poner la dirección tanto en el edificio interior como en el predio.
en ese caso mejor en el predio. 
Cuando veo ese tipo de duplicados tiendo a dejar solo uno, y de ahí veo cual según el caso.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161289480
VicenteBarraFM (2025-01-13 15:13:16+00:00): Ah, okey, comprendo. Creía que era mejor ponerla en ambos, pero veo que no es tan necesario siempre según lo que me dices.
santamariense (2025-01-18 14:28:05+00:00): Bem-vind@, Nascimento0689,

Vi tua edição. Apenas uma coisa precisa ser ajustada. No OSM não se deve abreviar coisas. No teu caso, não abrevie a palavra "Travessa", escreva ela por extenso.

Bons mapeamentos!
santamariense
Dani CS (2025-03-04 20:06:11+00:00): Would it make sense to mark the Belos Cavalos airport with tag `access=private` instead of adding " (private)" in the `name` tag?
sRoydSmith (2025-03-05 02:53:51+00:00): Well yes and no. There is no direct support for that tag offered in the two editors I looked at. Sure a person can add any tag to any item however if its not a common tag, no renderers will note it on a map. There is a need to identify airports as public or private. Until the power-that-be modify the editors to encourage proper tagging on airports, its probably best to note it in the name.
Dani CS (2025-03-05 13:27:50+00:00): Thanks for your reply!

The tag `access=private` is used some 16 million times in OSM, that's 350 times more common than `aeroway=aerodrome`.

Adding the tag `access=private` is supported in all the editors I know of, so I just went ahead and added it.

If you believe that maps should show private airports in a different way, I would recommend opening an issue at the corresponding renderer (e.g. for the default map it would be the openstreetmap-carto repository in github).

Cheers!
TonyS999 (2025-01-23 11:32:49+00:00): The road has now reopened from its temporary closure - 
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/czdly32qzrvo
Will you now be updating the map?
trigpoint (2025-01-23 15:39:43+00:00): Hi hlo281
We do not update the map for closures as short a this one. Many consumers only take data periodically so unless a closure is measured in months the map shouldn't be updated.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-01-12 23:00:50+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Brzoskwiniowa":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12496969774
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12496969775
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12496969776
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12496969777
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12496969778

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Udarian (2025-01-13 05:34:58+00:00): what is your source for the oneway's because unless you have access to different bing imagery then me (the ones in iD) there is nothing to imply oneway, these likely are oneway but non of the available imagery shows that and thus unless you went to this location in person adding oneway like this isn’t warranted until there is newer imagery or some other source showing the oneway in this location.
Joseph R P (2025-01-13 23:31:23+00:00): In regards to "there is nothing to imply oneway", the median in the middle and the narrow lanes around the median are enough for me to be confident that this is a traffic calming installation and that each way is one way due to this. There are plenty of roads in the country that are divided with median, roundabouts, and other obstacles which lack markings, but because of general traffic laws and what side of the road we drive on in the country, it is safe to assume one way in each direction on these roads.
BCNorwich (2025-01-14 09:06:40+00:00): Hi, A few duplicated paths here, I think I've fixed them.
eggie (2025-01-13 09:53:39+00:00): De KFC heb ik verplaatst naar het gebouw erboven.
In de BAG staat hier geen gebouw.
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/?searchQuery=omloop+54&objectId=0090010000697661&theme=Luchtfoto%27s&geometry.x=201519.05612188907&geometry.y=569339.6311045319&zoomlevel=14.368024417092617

MVG
eggie
nileshbarawkar (2025-01-15 05:02:30+00:00): Hi Kshisu1,
Thanks for your contribution to OSM. but as per observation your doing changes randomly regarding Highway classification which is look like unnecessary, so any reason behind it?
Kshisu1 (2025-01-15 06:18:55+00:00): As you know, osm doesn't collect traffic data. So for routing it gives priority to trunk over primary road. By making ring roads trunk router Will give priority to ring road over internal core roads when ever there are these two options internal roads and ring roads.
ramthelinefeed (2025-01-13 09:49:09+00:00): thanks for the repair, Mac! I was updating the stop used by this bus service but I realised ID wouldn't let me get the segments in the right order (there's at least three double-back loops on this route)
MacLondon (2025-01-13 22:31:28+00:00): Would be very tricky to get the right order using ID!

I discovered https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relatify yesterday. It could be particularly useful for mapping new bus route relations although I didn't test it too much.
silversurfer83 (2025-01-14 21:33:53+00:00): PLEASE! Square your buildings using the "Q"-key
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161292275
silversurfer83 (2025-01-14 21:40:38+00:00): hi
nice tracing. Please have a look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway and read that carefully. Some of your tertiary highways look more like service.

Of course, if you gave your sources properly, one could understand why you chose that tag...
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161292420
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-17 02:10:14+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165051276
Glassman (2025-01-13 03:03:27+00:00): Can you clarify, is the road privately owned and does it have a no trespassing sign? From what I can see Bing street view imagery does not show a no trespassing.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161293167
galen8183 (2025-01-13 02:15:08+00:00): the large bbox is due to removing w42937103 from r2605190
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-05-30 23:46:45+00:00): Reverted addition of SEO spam POI with malformed name=* missing any top-level tags, and addition of POI name=* to building

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183421882
felipeeugenio (2025-01-13 12:13:43+00:00): Hola. Ya está abierta y habitada Villa Esperanza?
saludos
Seltian (2025-01-14 04:08:06+00:00): Hola buenas, sí la villa fue entregada el 30 de octubre del año pasado.
felipeeugenio (2025-01-14 11:55:07+00:00): ok, gracias
Herwescheluc (2025-01-14 17:32:28+00:00): Hallo, Beneathar,
schön, wenn Du Dich für OSM interessierst. Leider sind durch Deine Einträge etliche Dinge durcheinander geraten und ich habe aufgrund von mehreren Dutzend Fehlern, die so nicht bearbeitbar waren, Deine Arbeit wieder rückgängig gemacht. Als Herborner habe ich nicht nur die aktuellsten Dinge eingetragen, ich habe auch schon eine Menge Erfahrung gesammelt und weiß, was ich tue! Gerne stehe ich Dir Rede und Antwort, warum ich getan habe, was ich tun mußte. Du kannst mir jederzeit eine Nachricht senden, diese wird umgehend beantwortet. Ich würde mich freuen, wenn Dich diese Erfahrung nicht davon abhält einen neuen Versuch zu starten und wir in Herborn konstruktiv zusammen arbeiten würden.
Viele Grüße
Andreas

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161353489
Beneathar (2025-01-15 11:52:38+00:00): OK. Aktuell sehe ich auf OSM meine Einträge noch, ich vermute, das wird dann in einem Update demnächsrt wieder verschwinden? Sorry, ich war da wohl etwas wild entschlossen, manchmal habe ich nachts solche Phasen wenn ich was anfangen will, das mir schon länger im geist rumwirbelt. Ich fand auch das handling eher fummelig und ich befürchte, ich könnte auch mit misclicks einiges versemmelt haben, daher voll OK für mich, dass das Rückgängig gemacht wird. Ich würde die Dinge, die ich richtig finde (sowas wie das entfernen der nicht mehr aktuellen Baustelle an der Kallenbachbrücke) dann in kleinen, kohärenten päckchen nochmal vorlegen und mich vorher nochmal mehr Informieren.

Über Hilfreiche Links würde ich mich freuen, ich lerne gern dazu.
Herwescheluc (2025-01-16 19:56:10+00:00): Guten Abend, Beneathar,
werde mich morgen mal ausführlich melden! Nach anstrengendem Tag steht mir heute der Sinn nach früh schlafen...
Gut's Nächtle!
Andreas
mariotomo (2025-05-07 14:28:53+00:00): :+1:
tastrax (2025-01-18 11:17:12+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, +61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features#Phone_Numbers .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
Pink Duck (2025-01-19 10:18:15+00:00): Great stuff.
jxw5883 (2025-01-13 02:48:20+00:00): Correction, not bing maps but Fairfax County Orthoimagery
Kovoschiz (2025-01-13 07:35:03+00:00): `=private` means individually allowed. which is not the case here. Events accept anyone willing to pay (`=yes`) , so should be `=customers`
gscholz (2025-01-22 07:22:49+00:00): Hi helicoysfh_Plateau_import,
your recent import activities have left behind several errors regarding self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=137.06146&lat=34.90160&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
mrpulley (2026-02-28 09:31:35+00:00): Confirming that maxspeed is correct here (checked at survey)
mavl (2025-05-13 15:03:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
❤️‍🔥 (2025-03-05 10:20:24+00:00): hey, https://osm.org/way/1350825473 has no tags, do you remember what this line was supposed to be?
ralley (2025-03-05 17:29:17+00:00): Some accidental arifact from editing, I've removed it
❤️‍🔥 (2025-03-06 08:53:47+00:00): thanks :)
mavl (2025-05-13 15:08:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
Frank Peng (2026-01-13 05:51:20+00:00): Looking at your changeset comment, it's "NS" for Norfolk Southern (the railroad company), not "N&S". It's the former Virginian Railway line (the NS Whitethorne District), not "Virginia Line". I know this since I'm a train enthusiast that has been railfanning on the NS Christiansburg and Whitethorne Districts.
Frank Peng (2026-01-13 05:53:04+00:00): You incorrectly spelled "Belview" in this changeset's comment. "Belview has one "l", not two l's.
mavl (2025-05-13 15:09:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
felipeeugenio (2025-01-13 12:14:02+00:00): Buena, muchas gracias
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161294146
mavl (2025-05-13 15:06:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
mavl (2025-05-13 15:04:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
mavl (2025-05-13 15:07:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
Grass-snake (2025-01-13 18:51:25+00:00): Отменено
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161321322
mavl (2025-05-13 15:08:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
mavl (2025-05-13 15:06:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
mavl (2025-05-13 15:07:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-13 00:52:12+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164876409
phoenixsaigon1698 (2025-01-14 06:57:39+00:00): Mấy cái này chắc cấm 6h sáng - 21h đêm nhá. Sau giờ họp chợ đi được đấy.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-13 00:47:08+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164876351
mavl (2025-05-13 15:05:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
4004 (2025-01-19 23:12:26+00:00): здравствуйте, но ведь остатки дороги там есть, на трек тянет, мост обозначен как бывший - что не так?
4004 (2025-01-25 23:35:08+00:00): reverted as explained above

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161764774
mavl (2025-05-13 15:07:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
user_8655426 (2025-01-22 09:29:56+00:00): こんにちは。
一連の安城市のPlateauインポートで、既存の建物をすべて削除されているため、既存データとPlateauデータの"マージ"が行われていません。
マニュアルの通りにインポート作業が行われていないようです。手順書などのご確認をお願いいたします。

JA:MLIT PLATEAU/imports outline
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:MLIT_PLATEAU/imports_outline

JA:MLIT PLATEAU/imports outline/manual
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:MLIT_PLATEAU/imports_outline/manual

JA talk:MLIT PLATEAU/imports outline
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA_talk:MLIT_PLATEAU/imports_outline

JA:Keep the history (履歴を残す)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Keep_the_history
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161296204
mavl (2025-05-13 15:08:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
mavl (2025-05-13 15:04:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
mavl (2025-05-13 15:09:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
mavl (2025-05-13 15:04:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
Kovoschiz (2025-01-13 07:24:32+00:00): As said many times, please don't make random edits especially deletions to attempt to fix a software issue. You should investigate the software, not fiddle with the data.
Kovoschiz (2025-01-13 07:36:07+00:00): The `=no_left_turn` was wrongly set as `=only_left_turn`
mavl (2025-05-13 15:06:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
mavl (2025-05-13 15:03:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
mavl (2025-05-13 15:07:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
mavl (2025-05-13 15:03:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
mavl (2025-05-13 15:03:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
mavl (2025-05-13 15:06:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
mavl (2025-05-13 15:07:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
HellMap (2025-01-14 23:48:38+00:00): Sveiki,

Gribēju precizēt par https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1350841153 ceļu. Vai šis savienojums vairs neeksistē vispār?

Paldies
trakais (2025-01-22 09:48:12+00:00): Jā, tur nav. Viņš ir norakts un uz tā ir sabērtas zemes kaudzes, īpašnieks plāno ceļu būvēt citur, bet tas nav uzsākts. Papildināšu, kad uzradīsies jauns ceļš
mavl (2025-05-13 15:05:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
mavl (2025-05-13 15:08:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
eggie (2025-01-13 08:34:34+00:00): Dag Carlo,

Ik heb name aangepast naar note=.... 
Tijdelijke brug ivm werkzaamheden Pastoor Gielenstraat is geen officiële straatnaam.
Is deze brug werkelijk bedoeld voor autoverkeer?

MVG
eggie