piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
gurglypipe (2024-05-17 20:01:07+00:00): Several of the ones I noticed being changed were crags, which could probably more specifically be tagged as natural=cliff, for example.

The other ones which are knolls/rises probably still should be natural=peak if they have a name, since natural=peak is more specific than place=locality. You could add a prominence= tag (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:prominence) to them, if the prominence is known and suitably licensed for inclusion in OSM. That could be used to highlight or downplay them in the rendering if needed, in future (I don’t think it affects the rendering at the moment).
dmfr (2024-06-07 18:51:04+00:00): Olá! Porque é que reverteste as adições de metadados à way 1208404629 (Colégio de São João)?
Josef K (2024-06-11 22:02:15+00:00): Esclarecido em conversa privada. Erro meu nesse caso concreto, ao separar áreas amenity=school de muros e edifícios.
Ewrt1 (2024-05-17 01:17:11+00:00): *Big bbox because I edited the long Scotford Subdivision way
tastrax (2024-05-17 05:37:34+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features .  Brackets are not required around any part of the phone number. I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
alexwohlbruck (2024-06-02 02:48:54+00:00): I have reverted this changeset as I have previously mapped the newly opened Sullenberger Aviation Museum which is located here, using the 2024 Mecklenberg nearmap imagery
citrula (2024-05-17 04:43:37+00:00): Looks good to me, welcome to OSM!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151432789
akimapbuilder (2024-05-17 06:16:54+00:00): When adding building, try to follow building footprints and match the geometry. Cheers!
MyoKyawKyaw (2024-05-29 11:24:12+00:00): Thank you for your contribution in mapping. This aquaculture ponds mapping look great and also the clear changeset comment. Keep Contributing, Cheers!!!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151435842
Lezurex (2024-05-19 09:23:39+00:00): Hi rokas_osm
You (accidentally) moved some tracks around, so I reverted that part of your changeset. Should look normal again!
Happy mapping!

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151525312
rokas_osm (2024-05-21 13:07:30+00:00): I see, ok, thx.
Sakari_N (2025-10-08 14:50:06+00:00): Hei, olit muuttanut pyörätien seinäksi. Kumosin muutoksesi, koska en löydä mitään lähdettä sille että Kärjenkaaren poikki menisi joku seinä/aitarakennelma. Lisäksi tuo kevyenliikenteen väylä näkyy ilmakuvissa ja on myös Seinäjoen Kaupungin virastokartassa, joten se lienee ihan asianmukainen.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173009195
Glassman (2024-05-17 16:01:19+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151436389
Vinber-Pro (2024-05-27 07:57:50+00:00): Bonjour Mathieu,
est-ce des lieux accessibles au public ou plutôt à destination des pros, voire seulement pour la gestion des déchets de la CCBG ?

à plus
Glassman (2024-05-17 16:02:37+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. But you can improve your work by squaring buildings. To square, select the outline then just type a "q"
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151436772
felipeeugenio (2024-05-17 12:49:41+00:00): otro duplicado
Romwriter (2024-05-17 07:06:33+00:00): Hallo under_donkey, die "Zentrale" ist jetzt doppelt eingetragen, einmal als Bar, einmal als Veranstaltungszentrum (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4829319678). Was ist richtig?
Romwriter (2024-05-29 08:07:41+00:00): Hallo under_donkey, bitte um Rückmeldung. Beste Grüße, Romwriter
under_donkey (2024-05-29 08:40:15+00:00): Hmm, jetzt Rückmeldung per Webseite.
Jep ist doppelt durch mich erstellt, ich hatte in der APP ein alten Status.
julcnx (2024-05-17 20:05:04+00:00): Hi there! Thank you for your contributions! Just a friendly tip for next time, it's a good practice to save and upload your changes before moving on to the next area. You can find more information on changesets and their geographical size at: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151437776
felipeeugenio (2024-05-17 12:31:12+00:00): otro duplicado
jvazquel_sitna-import (2024-05-21 17:59:36+00:00): Hola Ritxarcontx.
¿Por qué estás eliminando los emergency:access_point?
Se utilizan por parte de los servicios de emergencia del Gobierno de Navarra: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Importaci%C3%B3n_de_datos_del_SITNA/Conjuntos_de_datos
Vas111 (2024-07-14 01:11:51+00:00): Hello,
The correct way to tag the variable speed limit is maxspeed:conditional=20 mph @ flashing, not the other way around.
cyclehunter (2024-08-12 10:55:26+00:00): Thank you for seeing this. I had not known about the "flashing" tagging. Thank you also for correcting the other roads in Hartlepool.
Vas111 (2024-08-12 13:47:42+00:00): Glad to help, here's an example of such tagging: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1258874282
I don't know of any software that implements the flashing speed limits but it's best to have the default road limit as the actual maxspeed value
pitfire (2024-05-17 12:06:53+00:00): Hi computerfarmer,

das gesamte Gelände als unterirdisches Gebäude ist wohl eher ein Versehen.
betr.:building=yes & layer=-1
Der Name ist Henrich nicht Heinrich Baustoffzentrum

Gruß pitfire
George Sears (2024-05-17 18:13:56+00:00): Salve, le ho scritto già nell'altro gruppo di modifiche che ha effettuato, ho notato che anche qui ha cambiato dei tag in maniera inesatti, consiglio sempre di consultare la wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:archaeological%20site, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:historic:civilization?uselang=en#Italy) per attenersi agli standard già esistenti e fare in modo che i suoi contributi siano più facilmente accessibili sulle mappe
pavvv (2024-05-17 13:38:54+00:00): Skróty rozwijamy
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Nazwy#Skr%C3%B3ty_(nie_r%C3%B3b_tego!)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Znakowanie_dr%C3%B3g_w_Polsce#Nazwy_ulic_z_patronem
julcnx (2026-06-16 03:59:56+00:00): Hi, some of the ways tagged `surface=clay` in this changeset appear to be laterite roads. `surface=laterite` was approved on 2026-06-15 and describes this surface more precisely. Would you be comfortable retagging? Happy to do it if you prefer. More info: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface=laterite
julcnx (2026-06-16 09:54:56+00:00): Sorry, please ignore my previous comment, it was meant for a different changeset. Wrong one, apologies for the noise!
Syl (2024-05-17 09:40:38+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai modifié le type, les centres d’examen du code de la route ne sont pas des auto-écoles. À ma connaissance il n'y a pas de tag spécifique pour ça. Bonne journée.
Tomas Straupis (2024-05-17 08:37:47+00:00): Pakeitimas atšaukas, nes keičiama neturint vietos žinių.
Mariia_K (2024-05-17 09:46:35+00:00): Hi, Tomas!
Our client works here, it is your local distributor. So, I edit the routes so that he can deliver his goods to this zone
Tomas Straupis (2024-05-17 10:28:47+00:00): Hello. No, your classification does not correspond to the actual situation on the ground.
literan (2024-05-17 17:40:41+00:00): как-то здесь слишком грубо получилось, в жилую зону вошли территории стройки https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13458325
HBanu (2024-06-20 11:18:35+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.#OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151439501
HBanu (2024-06-20 11:16:47+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151439522
NorthCrab_upload (2024-05-17 07:40:23+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11911756611

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Madi-Red (2024-07-02 08:46:16+00:00): Hello Prajaktakhilari
Thank you for mapping!
You have deleted the polygon, but as per aerial imagery the building polygon is visible and needs to align the geometry.
Please inspect your task carefully before closing.
Happy Mapping!
complete_gth (2024-05-18 16:45:36+00:00): Hi und wilkommen bei OSM, 
du hast hier den ganzen Nordflügel von Schloss Friedenstein als Schlosskirche getaggt, diese ist aber schon als Node erfasst (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/269905070). In den meisten Fällen versuchen wir, Objekte nur einmal in der Datenbank zu erfassen. 
Da meiner Kenntnis nach die Kirche nur einen kleinen Teil des Flügels beansprucht, würde ich es bei dem Punktobjekt belassen. Wenn du die genaue Position kennst, könnte man die Schlosskirche auch als eigene Fläche erfassen. 

Bei Fragen kannst du dich gerne melden
Geonator1984 (2024-05-24 07:32:29+00:00): Hi und merci. Ja, das ist mir aufgefallen, aber der node markiert ja lediglich einen Punkt und repräsentiert nicht das Gebäude bzw. einen Teil davon. Die genaue Position der Kirche kenne ich leider nicht, sonst hätte ich sie als solche eingefügt; der Nordflügel ist aber jetzt lediglich als Linienobjekt und nicht als Gebäudeteil eingefügt. Hättest du eine idee wie man hier zukünftig verfahren könnte?
complete_gth (2024-05-24 09:16:02+00:00): Ich konnte die Kirche jetzt tatsächlich lokalisieren und habe sie in der nordöstlichen Hälfte des Nordflügels eingetragen (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1286201930) und den POI entfernt. In diesem Fall nicht als eigenes building, sondern als room=church (und den ganzen anderen tags).
Geonator1984 (2024-05-24 09:45:56+00:00): Das ist eine gute Idee; so ist es eindeutig.
vladislav471yakovlev (2024-05-17 07:58:41+00:00): Sorry for the missclick, the correction was made using BDOrtho IGN.
Глеб (2024-07-15 15:46:23+00:00): Улица не может иметь название "ул. Парковая". это неправильный порядок слов. Сокращения недопустимы.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Названия
eggie (2024-05-17 08:20:31+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Alle begin is emoeilijk. Het vlak van de school heb ik losgemaakt van de weg en het gebouw. Ligt nu over de school.
De naam van de school kan op de amenity=school. 
MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Laurensios (2024-05-17 09:05:44+00:00): Dank Eggie!
NorthCrab_upload (2024-05-17 08:10:28+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11911762149
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1233640254

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Глеб (2024-09-09 13:11:48+00:00): Возможно вы уже знаете, но не бывает в ОСМ названий ул. Залесная, это не соответствует стандартам. Надо писать Залесная улица.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-05-17 08:20:27+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/236468835

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
WieKo68 (2024-06-10 16:45:15+00:00): poprawiono
SekeRob (2024-05-24 06:58:40+00:00): Hi,

Welcome to Italy, bienvenuto a Italia. We speak no German as is your change set comment indicating. The quality programs indicates that 110KW capacity is incorrect and in fact capacity is the value to indicate how many vehicles can be charged here simultaneously. Would that be 1, 2, 3, 4? I've moved the 110 KW (space between value and unit of measure) to charging_station:output per the wiki. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station
Ciao
clay_c (2024-05-26 19:17:45+00:00): Hi someone123457 and welcome to OSM!

How come FM 1151 was changed from secondary to trunk here? It doesn't appear to be a major through route between metropolitan centers.
NeisBot (2024-05-17 08:40:04+00:00): Hi Relcity, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/754515318

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
James Derrick (2024-05-17 12:05:39+00:00): Hi,
Past ground survey shows there is no beach here, and changeset(s) change a highway=residential into barrier=fence.

This changeset has made the map worse, so has been reverted:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151450984
Happy Mapping,

James
James Derrick (2024-05-17 12:07:19+00:00): Hi,
Past ground survey shows there is no beach here, and changing a highway=residential into barrier=fence makes no sense.

This changeset has made the map worse, so has been reverted:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151450984
Happy Mapping,

James
felipeeugenio (2024-05-17 12:27:19+00:00): otro duplicado
James Derrick (2024-05-17 11:44:03+00:00): Hi,
You appear to have moved several significant roads many km to the South by accident.
As this change made the map worse, I have revered the entire changeset.

We all started somewhere on contributing to OSM, and mistakes do happen.

Please learn from this by being more careful editing the map, and only commit changes when safe to do so.
Happy Mapping,

James
James Derrick (2024-05-17 11:47:00+00:00): Revet changeset:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151450185
Madi-Red (2024-07-02 08:47:04+00:00): Hello Arjun khotodka
Thank you for mapping!
As per aerial imagery there is water tanker instead of deleting the way we can just add a tag.
Please inspect your task carefully before closing.
Happy Mapping!
Supaplex030 (2024-05-18 12:51:58+00:00): Hallo momabebra, wie schon öfter angemerkt hast du auch hier wieder Bordsteinkanten in falscher Richtung verwendet. Aber leider liest du ja keine CS-Kommentare...
lg, Alex
Jakka (2024-05-17 09:32:56+00:00): Door toevoeging van jullie gegevens staan er nu dubbele coderingen zoals naamgeving adressen type gebouw deze staan er reeds op.....
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11911935139
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/116149697
teambuildingonwheels (2024-05-17 19:27:32+00:00): Ik bekijk alle opmetingen van vandaag dit weekend en zet alles juist. Onze app heeft momenteel nog niet de mogelijkheid om ways te tonen en te editen. Zou normaal gezien wel snel moeten toegevoegd worden, waardoor we dan de info rechtstreeks in de way zetten in plaats van een nieuwe node. Nu staat de info over een gebouw wat door elkaar, soms als een node en soms als een way. Maar de app gaan we dus hieraan aanpassen.
Jakka (2024-05-17 19:31:12+00:00): thx
eggie (2024-05-17 09:03:57+00:00): Oke.. volgens mij gebruiken we niet name = voor de operator behalve als de laadpaal echt een naam heeft.
Kijk even in de wiki operator? .. brand?
Houd me zelf niet zo met die laadpalen bezig..
Mapse
eggie
simartin82 (2024-05-17 09:54:47+00:00): Jij hebt gelijk, dank je. Gecorrigeerd in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151445209
eggie (2024-05-17 09:57:41+00:00): 👍
FajrAl (2024-05-22 23:27:11+00:00): Hai, kenapa Anda menghapus atau bahkan mengubah dengan cara memotong sebagian rute jalannya? Saya orang lokal yang mendigitasi daerah tersebut.

Hi, why did you delete or even change by cutting part of the route? I am a local in the area.
FajrAl (2024-05-22 23:30:57+00:00): Jalan yang tertutup pepohonan dalam Esri World Imagery, bukan berarti tidak ada jalan.

A road that is covered by trees in Esri World Imagery does not mean there is no road.
AzatRiver (2024-05-24 11:19:24+00:00): Hello FajarAlim, thank you for confirming the connections here. I will add them back. Since you are a local to the area, would you happen to know if this section of highway is drivable, or if it is for pedestrians only? Thanks!
FajrAl (2024-05-25 11:19:49+00:00): It's a trail only accessible for pedestrian, bicycle, or motorcycle
FajrAl (2024-05-25 11:21:33+00:00): The upper right is driveable by 1 car, it's concrete main village road.
AzatRiver (2024-05-28 14:07:35+00:00): Thank you!
aTarom (2024-05-17 11:34:41+00:00): Hello, thanks for editing, it seems that the elevation value does not correspond to this area
ele=320 (371 MDT5 IGN)
perhaps the source is wrong and refers to the airport that is further down?
Do you think it's okay to correct the elevation value?
ele=320 -> 371
https://www.osm.org/way/316907707/history
I have no experience in the subject of airports and I prefer to ask first
Cheers
Jan Olieslagers (2024-05-17 11:49:30+00:00): Very nice of you to discusss before acting, much appreciated. I took the elevation from the source I mentioned: https://aterriza.org/?s=alcocer But that is not an official source, it may well be inaccurate. Please feel free to go ahead, I will not interfere!
aTarom (2024-05-17 15:37:31+00:00): Great!!! thanks for the answer, I proceed with the value of the IGN MDT5
you can check at ráster image IGN iD layer or https://www.ign.es/iberpix/visor/
Cheers and happy mapping
Jan Olieslagers (2024-05-17 15:40:06+00:00): To do it right: add a note to your edit, pointing out your source of information.
Cheers!
fititnt (2024-06-13 11:47:46+00:00): Olá @MapperManuel, pergunta para você (ou então os organizadores do #hotosm-project-16739):

Por que você esta deletando edificações  perfeitamente visíveis feitas em outra atividade organizada 9 meses atrás (#hotosm-project-15557) e aparentemente recriando como novas na atividade atual?

Um dos exemplos: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1210052724/history#map=19/-29.22019/-51.89213 (deletado) foi recriado como https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1283878215#map=19/-29.22019/-51.89203 (que alias, é um import do via o Rapid).
Jakka (2024-05-17 09:44:11+00:00): ne pas enlever codage que vous ne comprenez pas encore. Comme railway=ababandoned c'est utiliser dans ce applications.....
https://www.openrailwaymap.org/?style=standard&lang=fr&lat=50.41233275147139&lon=4.311811923980713&zoom=15
A35K (2024-05-17 12:38:34+00:00): Wäre schon toll wenn Go Map den eingetippten Changeset comment und Quelle auch nutzen würde...
Jakka (2024-05-17 09:54:34+00:00): dit restaurant staat niet binnen vorm gebouw op juiste locatie ? en staat er dubbel in. Graag nazicht en verbetering volgens gegevens ter plaatse ;)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11911920756
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11911916190
Anas masuris (2024-05-17 10:57:55+00:00): Hej, skąd jest źródło tej nazwy? Przy dodawaniu zmian należy zawsze podawać źródło.

Plus, zgodnie z Radą Języka Polskiego (https://rjp.pan.pl/index.php), nazwa mostu powinna być napisana dużą literą ("w nazwach obiektów przestrzeni publicznej wprowadzenie pisowni wielką literą stojącego na początku wyrazu aleja, brama, bulwar, osiedle, plac, park, kopiec, kościół, klasztor, pałac, willa, zamek, most, molo, pomnik, cmentarz (przy utrzymaniu pisowni małą literą wyrazu ulica), np. ulica Józefa Piłsudskiego, Aleja Róż, Brama Warszawska, Plac Zbawiciela, Park Kościuszki, Kopiec Wandy, Kościół Mariacki, Pałac Staszica, Zamek Książ, Most Poniatowskiego, Pomnik Ofiar Getta, Cmentarz Rakowicki;")
kenai (2024-05-17 11:06:36+00:00): https://szczecin.tvp.pl/77560580/nowa-inwestycja-z-patronem-most-w-podjuchach-nazwany-imieniem-andrzeja-krefta

Zgodnie z decyzją RJP wspomniane zmiany wchodzą w życie dopiero od 2026 r. Większość mostów w Szczecinie zapisana jest od małej litery.
Anas masuris (2024-05-17 11:45:16+00:00): Zmiany można wprowadzić przed 1 stycznia 2026 (data jest tak wprowadzona, aby instytucje i inne placówki zdążyły się przygotować (co jest w komunikacie)).

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/zmiany-polskiej-ortografii-od-1-stycznia-2026/113207.

Przy edycji jest możliwość dodania źródeł (source) i tam radzę to umieszczać, żeby nie trzeba było się dopytywać - to na przyszłość
Tatfahren (2024-05-17 10:59:57+00:00): Hallo Mighty Mue,
Den Namen hast du damals selber eingetragen.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1258226343/history

Danke das du diesen nochmal geprüft hast, bei mir ist seitdem der tab offen, damit ich den nochmal prüfe wenn ich Zeit hätte.
miluethi (2024-05-17 22:13:54+00:00): Hi John,

I just deleted a few of your buildings, they were far too big compared to the satellite imagery.

Please square out your buildings. It's easy: just press the "Q" with a selected building shape.

Thank you for contributing to OSM Nicaragua.
mcliquid (2024-05-17 10:30:16+00:00): Hi,

please note: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
ivanbranco (2024-05-17 10:51:59+00:00): Hi mcliquid,

it's not really nice to receive a Osmcha downvote for an error made in good faith (forget to manually update StreetComplete). Could you please consider removing it? I understand the importance of informing new users about guidelines, but it feels less rewarding to active and experienced contributors who volunteer their time to the project to receive a thumb down.
mcliquid (2024-05-17 13:11:41+00:00): Do different rules apply for new or old users? Anyway, if you can show me a way to check your changeset in OsmCha properly, I'll be happy to change my mind immediately.
map per (2024-05-17 11:14:16+00:00): Because of review_requested:
This edit looks good, thanks!
BCNorwich (2024-05-17 11:12:38+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The building looks more like a shed than a house, especially as it's in a back garden. Even if it was a house the name would not be House. Thus I've amended your addition to OSM.

Regards Bernard.
aixbrick (2024-05-17 11:56:08+00:00): Hallo,
ein Hinweis zur Vergabe von access-Rechten (betrifft hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1283862807). Normalerweise haben Wegtypen bestimmte Default-Rechte, ein hw=footway ist also nur für Fußgänger freigegeben. Weitere einschränkende Rechte, wie motor_vehicle=no oder das alles sperrende access=no (was dann durch die weiteren Rechte wieder aufgeweicht wird), benötigt man nicht.
Und dann noch eine Nachfrage: Du hast bicycle=yes gesetzt: Normalerweise ist das Befahren von Wegen auf Friedhöfen für alle Fahrzeuge, also auch Fahrräder, verboten (siehe die allgemeine Friedhofssatzung unter https://www.stolberg.de/city_info/webaccessibility/index.cfm?item_id=867016&modul_id=15&record_id=17355). Ist das hier anders?
Gruß
MGA_AC (2024-05-17 12:04:44+00:00): Danke für dein Info! Das mit den Fahrrädern war mir nicht bekannt. ändere ich entsprechend ab und berücksichtige es für die weiteren Wege. Sind ja noch ein paar... :-D