piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2024-01-06 12:57:26+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Something weird.
You mapped 9 buildings over already mapped buildings. Did you not notice them ? The same day earlier mapped.
aceman444 (2024-01-24 15:45:41+00:00): Please read the definition of building=terrace before you use it: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dterrace . All the terraces you added are wrong.
Frans S (2024-01-05 16:29:40+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 

Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Inaccurate mapped
Buildings often not squared
Clustered buildings.
Connected nodes of buildings to each other.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145921128
joost schouppe (2024-01-06 10:50:16+00:00): Hoi David,
Iemand anders heeft hier inmiddels een uitzondering voor fietsers aan toegevoegd. Lijkt me logisch omdat het verlengde ook die uitzondering al had
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2024-01-30 16:05:03+00:00): نرجوا منكم عدم إضافة اماكن خاصة للخريطة
Bobbi123 (2024-01-06 18:29:25+00:00): Bitte unterlasse solche und ähnlich Änderungen in dieser Art! Du hast hier ein großes Chaos angerichtet, was ich nun aufwändig wieder bereinigen muss. Bitte nicht eintragen oder Dinge so krass verändern, wenn du dir nicht sicher bist, dass sie wirklich so existieren und v.a. keine falschen Daten eintragen.
P0wl0wl (2024-01-06 20:17:20+00:00): Hallo Bobbi,
ich kann deinem Kommentar leider nur eines entnehmen: Du bist verärgert. Es ist mir aber nicht möglich nachzuvollziehen weshalb und wie ich es in Zukunft vermeiden kann. Dafür ist dein Kommentar viel zu emotional und unkonkret.

Wie du den Tags entnehmen kannst, habe ich mit Streetcomplete gearbeitet. Ich habe hier also nur simple Fragen beantwortet über das, was ich vor Ort gesehen habe.
Die Fragen waren sinngemäß:
1. Ist hier eine erkennbare Möglichkeit für Fußgänger zum Überqueren der Straße (z.B. Bordstein abgesenkt oder entsprechende Markierungen)? Das habe ich bejaht
2. Welcher Art ist der Übergang (Ampel, Markierungen, keine Markierungen)? Hier habe ich zweimal unmarkiert geantwortet und einmal war der Weg mit Strichen markiert.
3. Ist der Übergang mit taktiler Pflasterung für Sehbehinderte gepflastert? Auch hier habe ich entsprechend meiner Beobachtung vor Ort geantwortet.

Aus meiner Sicht habe ich hier nicht "falsche Daten" eingetragen und bin mir sicher, dass ich die Fragen beantwortet habe wie sie "wirklich so existieren".

Vielleicht fehlt mir das Verständnis, warum ich damit "ein großes Chaos angerichtet" haben soll. Aber dein Kommentar trägt leider nicht dazu bei dieses Verständnis zu liefern.

Gerne lasse ich mir meinen Fehler erklären. Aber akut habe ich eher das Gefühl meine Mitarbeit einfach sein zu lassen, wenn mir mit solch einem Kommentar begegnet wird. Bitte überdenke, ob du mit diesem Kommentar wirklich dem OSM-Projekt weiterhilfst.
Bobbi123 (2024-01-06 21:59:51+00:00): Ganz einfach: Du hast z.B. an diversen Querungen durch deine Änderungen Informationen gelöscht. An der Einmündung Forchheimer Straße / Viktor-von-Scheffel-Straße war die Querung korrekt mit allen Infos getaggt. Du dagegen hast einen Teil davon in einer Änderung gelöscht um dann in zwei weiteren Änderungen erst wieder halbwegs die ursprünglichen Tags neu einzugeben, die aber so auch wieder nicht korrekt waren. Das Fehlende habe ich nun wieder ergänzt. Das war auch an anderen Querungen der Fall.

Und an anderen Stellen hast du durch deine Änderungen aus Querungen ohne Markierungen plötzlich Fußwege gemacht, was so auch wieder nicht korrekt war. Warum?

Das waren jetzt genug Beispiele, anhand dessen du dir deine diversen Änderungen nochmal ansehen kannst, so dass du selbst erkennen wirst, was du hier an Informationen gelöscht hast und wie sehr du mir hier Arbeit gemacht hast, das wieder zu korrigieren.

Aber dein Vorwurf der angeblichen Emotionalität ist klar zurückzuweisen, weil er nicht zutrifft. Es war meinerseits eine ganz normale, objektive Darstellung dessen, was du hier falsch gemacht hast und wie du dadurch andere User wie mich dazu nötigst, das wieder in Ordnung zu bringen. Das musst du im Rahmen der Kritikfähigkeit eben aushalten können. Deine Opfer-Rolle, die du hier nun machen möchtest, geht deshalb absolut ins Leere.

Bitte achte schlicht und einfach künftig VOR deinen Änderungen darauf, was bereits an Informationen in der Karten vorhanden ist, eher du sowas in diesem Umfang erst löscht und dann nur teils wiederherstellst.
aceman444 (2025-06-22 14:44:40+00:00): Hi, thanks for updating the trolley wires in Bratislava.
However, you have done some mistakes here.

If there is already the tag trolley_wire=yes on both-ways road, adding trolley_wire:backward=yes or :forward does not add anything, as both ways are already tagged. On some roads you ment the wires are only in one direction, in that case you should have removed the bidirectional trolley_wire=yes tag after adding :backward or :forward variant.

Why is there no trolley wire at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/203390144 ? How would the trolleybus reverse to the next stop (on the opposite side of the road) ? The trolley wire exists there.
RaccoonFederation (2024-09-05 08:57:30+00:00): Hi, Is it possible this is in the wrong place? There is an AED on Howgate Village Hall, the next building south.
RedAuburn (2024-09-05 12:58:26+00:00): heya, yep i think this is an accidental dupe 👍️have removed
Frans S (2024-01-05 15:45:03+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. However, Many buildings are not squared.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145922818
vojtechzaboril (2024-01-05 16:36:06+00:00): Reverted (not in constuction nor build) https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145929166
tom_yorados (2024-01-05 22:41:56+00:00): Hey,
review: sieht alles ok aus.
Wegen deiner Frage: klar, könnte man das detailliert mappen. Ich würd es aber eher nicht machen. Solche Infos müssen immer auch gepflegt werden. Mapping von Universitäten ist sowieso schon chaotisch genug.
shtrophic (2024-01-05 22:53:47+00:00): Alles klar, danke!
PedroMTG13 (2024-01-05 18:53:50+00:00): Hi Pipeton,

Shoundn't be 'BigCity Porto Asprela Co-Living' in point or building?
Pipeton (2024-01-05 18:59:07+00:00): Not necessarily, in my opinion. I think that whole area is owned by the residence, since it was the the area of the construction site for the tower.
And it currently has several benches and gardens that clearly belong to the residence, being tended by the same crew and with the same visual style.
Lejun (2024-01-05 14:15:12+00:00): Doute, voir https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3519730
Frans S (2024-01-05 16:11:00+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Inaccurate mapped.
Buildings not squared.
Quality prevails above quantity !


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145923673
Frans S (2024-01-05 15:48:32+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 

Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Mappings not accurate
connected nodes to other buildings
Buildings often not squared.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145923934
NeisBot (2024-01-06 00:19:46+00:00): Hello knn, thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.

Thanks!

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
Vinber-Pro (2024-03-27 14:32:59+00:00): Bonjour,
tu as ajouté une station service en double. D'où proviennent tes infos ?

et tes commentaires de changesets ne sont pas vraiment explicites, tu parles de Divers Lanes Maxspeed etc  et tu touches beaucoup de choses différentes ..
Frans S (2024-01-05 16:01:29+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 

Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
you followed the shadow lines of a tree over the building. Just extrapolate the rooflines


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145924162
Chris Fleming (2024-01-09 13:59:24+00:00): Hi - welcome to OSM or at least your first Edit. I see you requested a review, which is why I stopping by to say hello.

Overall the edit looks good, from the comment about the library you should see that the way we often map this kind of thing is to have the building mapped as what kind of thing it is and then when there are multiple functions we add these as point (or nodes) on the map, so here there is  a node for the library.

Let me know if you have any questions?
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-05 15:00:18+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1237292088

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
lubosb (2024-01-21 17:33:08+00:00): Ahoj, v areáli Meriny si podľa údajov ÚGKK Inspire zakreslil zbúrané budovy.

Prosím nabudúce, keď budeš kresliť niečo podľa katastra alebo ortofoto na plochách, kde si v histórii môžeš skontrolovať, že boli nedávne zmeny a keď kreslíš budovy krížom cez parkovisko - kontaktuj autorov týchto zmien.

Údaje katastra či nebodaj Ortofoto z roku 2022 nemusia byť v roku 2024 aktuálne...

Opravil som to v changesete #146521661
Patr1k_P (2024-01-22 14:07:11+00:00): budov a rôznych objektov je na našom území asi dosť neaktualnych a v niektorých častiach sa asi stane, že sa sem tam nakreslia aj také, ktoré neexistujú, pretože nie sú aktuálne snímky ani údaje v katastri, o tom samozrejme viem... postupne sa to opraví pri nových snímkach, alebo opraví niekto, kto lokalitu pozná... tvoj koment mi dôjde trochu mimo, neviem kto pozerá históriu plochy, kde ide kresliť... možno na malej ploche by to šlo, ale určite si si všimol že som dopĺňal na veľkej rozlohe a snáď po mne nechceš aby som nejak kontroloval či budova, ktorú som pridal nie je náhodou zburana
lubosb (2024-01-22 15:56:05+00:00): Samozrejme, že nečakám kontrolu pri každom trocha väčšom importe.

Len ma zarazilo, že ťa pri importe nič neupozornilo že kreslíš krížom cez parkovisko - to si nijako nemenil. A že si štandardnú kocku obchodného domu zmenil na nejakú mnohouholníkovú záležitosť s popriliepanými importovanými budovami.

Ak si tieto zmeny v importe robil ručne, tak mi to prišlo ako príliš veľa roboty s jedným importom...
Patr1k_P (2024-01-23 07:59:20+00:00): uz som to preskumal a zistil kde bola chyba...ja som mal parkovisko skryte filtrom, takze som ho nevidel a preto som tam narubal budovu, inak by som to tam samozrejme nedaval, takze tam vznikol cely problem..v tom pripade sa ospravedlnujem a dakujem za upozornenie, parkoviska radsej zviditelnim
eggie (2024-01-05 15:50:53+00:00): Dag Lantea,
Je vraagt feedback. 
Lijkt me oke. De naam staat ook al in de BGT. 
De doorgang heb ik omgezet naar tunnel=building_passage .. layer=-1 hoeft niet... immers maaiveldhoogte. 
sidewalk alleen als iets parallel aan een weg loopt.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-01-05 16:02:37+00:00): .. en een hotel kun je bijtaggen op de adresnode met tourism=hotel name=....
ghostrider44 (2024-01-06 10:53:41+00:00): Hallo kajwich,

Schau dir mal folgende Seite an:

https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/DE/BW/DE-BW-VVS-Analysis.html#bus_561 

Laut Chronik hast du am 05.01.2024 mit dem iD-Editor in diesem Bereich Änderungen vorgenommen:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145925641 

Nun stimmt u.a. die Reihenfolge der befahrenen Teilstücke nicht mehr. Der iD-Editor eignet sich m.E. absolut nicht für die Bearbeitung von Busrelationen. Dafür sollte der JOSM verwendet werden, insbesondere wenn eine Schleife gefahren wird und der Bus auf derselben Strecke ein Stück zurückfährt. Dann müssen diese Wegstücke erneut an der richtigen Stelle in der korrekten Reihenfolge aufgenommen werden. Bringst du die Relationen wieder in Ordnung?

Gruß ghostrider44
tordans (2024-01-08 08:11:34+00:00): Hallo ghostrider44, danke für den Hinweis. Dass iD Probleme mit Relationen hat, ist ja ein seit Jahren bekanntes Problem. iD selbst bietet keine Tools an, um das zu korrigieren. Jemand aus der Community der sich mit diesen Dingen auskennt, muss dann leider nacharbeiten. Weder kajwich noch ich (wir arbeiten zusammen an dem Erfassen von Parkraum in diesem Bereich), können das machen.
Viele Grüße, Tobias
Supaplex030 (2024-01-30 08:42:31+00:00): Hallo ghostrider44, sehe ich richtig, dass du die Buslinienrelation bereits repariert hast und hier kein Handlungsbedarf mehr besteht?
lg, Alex
ghostrider44 (2024-01-30 16:32:43+00:00): Hallo Alex,
da mir Tobias geschrieben hat, dass er dies nicht machen kann, habe ich die Busrelationen korrigiert. Momentan besteht also keine Handlungsbedarf.
Gruß Wilhelm
Frans S (2024-01-09 11:19:51+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping. 
Please do not collect multiple buildings and map it as 1 building.
Please square also each building with the q key
Best regards
DaveF (2024-01-05 19:38:41+00:00): This is a railway station. There's no implication it is part of National Rail as it doesn't have NR operator, or ref:crs tags and is clearly marked with usage=tourism.

Please don't make edits you don't comprehend.
5HAD0W@Brighton&Hove (2024-01-06 00:41:26+00:00): Hi Dave it was also marked public transport when it actually is not which it implies its part of National Rail and or NR, if it removed the tourism tag when the P/T one was removed then my bad
5HAD0W@Brighton&Hove (2024-01-06 00:50:45+00:00): I also see you have now re-reverted tourist attractions & a fairground ride to being public transport when even you know it is not. These will be reverted back as per real facts unless you will go through and mark them correctly
DaveF (2024-01-06 14:11:30+00:00): No, you removed the railway-station primary tag. 

Hopefully re-adding the *accurate* data will encourage you to make more accurate edits & refrain from arrogant, aggressive comments such as: "DO NOT RE-EDIT".
5HAD0W@Brighton&Hove (2024-01-06 19:32:54+00:00): Mind you dave, i looked at the Do not re-edit bit and wont be re-adding that. Youve been here awhile so you would know.... Is there a tag for Heritage Railways , Miniature railways & Fairground rides instead of listing them under public when even you have said have nothing todo with that catagory? Just so we can have everything more organised and not clustered together?
Frans S (2024-01-17 12:28:33+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Buildings not squared.
Buildings incorrect mapped. Map a building as 1 object. You just mapped  a few times just 3 nodes and connected them to eachother
Also do not collect buildings and map them a 1 building.
Buildings not squared.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145926498
PiotrekR (2024-03-28 09:17:29+00:00): Tak się zastanawiam nad zasadnością nadawania nazwy tej ścieżce, nie ma żadnej oficjalnej nazwy, ani nawet (jeszcze) potocznej. Inną kwestią jest pytanie, czy to w ogóle jest droga rowerowa - nie widziałem żadnych oznaczeń, a nawet słyszałem, że jeżdżą tam samochody (zakazu chyba też rzeczywiście nie ma)
ika-chan! (2024-05-15 04:44:16+00:00): You provided no source for the proposed ring road in Igoumenitsa. A lot of road proposals in Greece often suffer from delays or postponements.
Dimitar155 (2024-01-10 15:13:54+00:00): Привет Ричард и за много години!

I do think that there is a path through this small forest. It was informal (no pavement, just dirt or mud) but it was quite wide and seems to be used by a lot of people. You can miss it if you come from the north side, but from the supermarket's entrance it's quite visible.

Поздрави,
Митко
rhhs (2024-01-10 18:38:06+00:00): Happy New Year to you too! I looked for the path from the supermarket but didn't see it so I deleted it. I'll look again next time I'm in the area (when the weather is a bit warmer...)
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-05 15:40:38+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11492012444
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11492012484

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Famlam (2024-01-20 14:10:33+00:00): Dag CartoKees, gewoon nieuwsgierigheid, maar zit er toevallig een vertraging op de BAG?

Het pand https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1237303621 had ik er namelijk een maand eerder afgehaald, en is op 29-12-2023 uit de BAG gehaald, maar is hier toch weer opnieuw geïmporteerd.
CartoKees (2024-01-21 08:05:38+00:00): Hallo Famlam,
Sorry voor het weer opvoeren van een gesloopt pand.  Ik ben wel alert op afwijkende situaties, maar deze had ik er niet uitgehaald.
Ik ben bezig met het opvoeren van missende panden. Daarvoor gebruik ik de export bestanden van de BAG-tool voor OSM. Deze wordt elke maand rond de 10e bijgewerkt, met gegevens tot de eerste van de maand. 
Mijn bewerking was in januari en voor 10 januari. De BAG zelf heeft geen vertraging, maar een export bestand een beetje.
NeisBot (2024-01-06 00:19:47+00:00): Hello Shyshka, thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.

Thanks!

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
gscholz (2024-01-06 07:52:03+00:00): Hi B Care Pharma,
this changeset has created duplicate nodes and displaced ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=100.71994&lat=13.75340&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=145928755

I have reverted it to fix those issues. Please be more careful in your changesets.
Kind regards
Guido
dpschep (2024-02-29 22:48:04+00:00): Hey fmvaldezg84, I noticed you made a bike repair station node using BikeHero. Thanks for checking it out but it was (and still is) broken :(

I'll fix it up soon and let you know when it's working again!

I've cleaned up the duplicate nodes here, so you've got nothing to worry about.
dpschep (2024-03-01 13:36:21+00:00): And it's up and running again! You can now see the original bike repair station at this location: https://bikehero.io/#18/39.98284/-75.15548
SomeoneElse (2024-01-08 23:56:19+00:00): Hello 5HAD0W@Brighton&Hove, and welcome to OSM!
I'm not sure what change you were trying to make here (and as you can see from https://osm.mapki.com/history/node/12709957 , someone has already reverted it).
This station has had "usage=tourism" on it for 10 years or so, so no map that is actually bothered about it is going to mistake it for a mainline station.
See e.g. just up the line at https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#20/54.43633/-0.72513 - you can see the mainline station in blue, and the NYMR one in brown.
Best Regards,
Andy
citrula (2024-01-05 21:13:17+00:00): Thanks for the fix! Happy mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145929537
os-emmer (2024-03-10 12:24:01+00:00): Hi n76,
you mapped here something using emergency=disaster_response before the proposal for this tag got approved. Can you confirm that this object fits to the current definition in the wiki? Or is it maybe an emergency=mountain_rescue?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1107578006
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:emergency=disaster_response
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:emergency=mountain_rescue
n76 (2024-03-10 16:11:15+00:00): This is the location that the Pine Mountain Club residents have their "Community Emergency Response Team" (CERT) equipment stored and also where they do their training. I believe the CERT falls more under disaster_response than mountain rescue. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community_emergency_response_team

There is a location tagged with mountain rescue fairly close near by at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/85211449 which is the base the the volunteer backcountry ski patrol that works with the US Forest Service.

For what it is worth, I am a volunteer with the backcountry ski patrol and have a cabin in Pine Mountain Club, thus the "local knowledge" source.
os-emmer (2024-03-10 17:11:42+00:00): I will note that this place is mapped according to the now approved definition. Thanks for your suport!
alessandrocarmeli (2024-03-13 15:14:57+00:00): fonti della strada nuova?
LorenzoPesci (2024-01-15 12:22:34+00:00): Per utente ovunquista: per i nomi coniati per gite in MTB va usato il campo mtb:name , non il campo name