piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
silversurfer83 (2023-02-01 14:33:35+00:00): Alles gut :)

Freue mich, dass Ihr hier seid. Sieht von hier aus so aus, als würde gerade eine (kleine) Klasse gemeinsam was schaffen. 

Frohes Mappen allerseits
user_10241830 (2023-02-01 17:10:38+00:00): Hallo,

mir ist noch etwas aufgefallen: für Nachhilfeeinrichtungen wäre vermutlich office=tutoring besser geeignet. amenity=prep_school bezeichnet etwas anderes, das passt hier nicht.

Das Wiki ist da leider extrem irreführend, und ich werde versuchen, die Dokumentation zu korrigieren, denn die stimmt m. E. nicht.

Gruß,
eiskalt-glasklar
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-06-16 12:39:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 137412856 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-06-16 12:39:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 137412856 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers
NorthCrab (2023-07-04 19:01:16+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2670176/history
Dlaczego ciągle stosujesz błędne mapowanie obszarów chodników? area=yes + highway=footway jest tutaj niepoprawne. Pozdrawiam!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-06-16 12:39:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 137412856 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers
FvGordon (2023-02-04 20:47:46+00:00): Gilt Tempo 30 auf diesem Stück der Gustav-Adolf-Straße ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/549424067 ) nur Mo und Fr oder Mo bis Fr?
user_18208051 (2023-02-05 02:49:49+00:00): Thanks for the tip, I have corrected it, the "-" was missing.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-06-16 12:39:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 137412856 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers
map per (2023-02-01 20:55:54+00:00): reverted this changeset as you deleted existing buildings and replaced them with new buildings that had a wrong geometry
archpdx (2023-02-09 05:04:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted in changeset 132287191
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-06-16 12:39:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 137412856 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers
map per (2023-02-01 20:51:30+00:00): this edit looks ok, probably no revert needed
map per (2023-02-01 20:51:17+00:00): this edit looks ok, probably no revert needed
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-06-16 12:40:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 137412856 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers
Aleksey Gorelikov (2023-02-01 13:55:48+00:00): https://data-usdot.opendata.arcgis.com/maps/usdot::highway-performance-monitoring-system-fsys-3/explore?location=39.564735%2C-111.454995%2C18.78
map per (2023-02-01 20:48:11+00:00): solved all problems in this changeset (deleted a zebra crossing that was part of a building)
eggie (2023-02-01 14:11:39+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback  Er is hier al een adresnode addr:housenumber=41R-1414

Zou dan name=414 correct zijn.. 
Voor huisnummers wordt niet de key name= gebruikt. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
jumbanho (2023-02-03 14:46:34+00:00): I changed craft=brewery to craft=distillery as that seems more appropriate.
map per (2023-02-10 16:49:22+00:00): reverted (deleted all changes from this changeset)
user_3022894 (2023-06-27 16:07:16+00:00): Hallo kutt_bkg,

grundsätzlich kann ich es verstehen, dass/wenn Zooschulen nicht mit amenity=school gekennzeichnet werden sollen.

Nur wäre es dann sinnvoll, wenn man einen anderen Key/Tag für diese Einrichtingen fände (idealerweise halt VOR dem Entfernen von amenity=school). 

Denn so "geistern" die Objekte lediglich mit einem name=* ohne Main-Tag herum (bspw. die Zooschule im Wuppertaler Zoo).

Viele Grüße
Lukas
aka Elefant
OSM_RogerWilco (2023-02-02 13:46:52+00:00): Hallo 19timber96,

bitte verwende service=parking_aisle nur für reine Zufahrten zu den Parkplätzen. Für (Haupt-)Zufahrten von Parkplätzen hw=service ohne service=* verwenden.

Korrigiert Du die Zufahrt wieder? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/179283083

Gruß Roger Wilco
MxxCon (2023-02-05 04:37:39+00:00): Hello.
What is this changeset about? A bunch of hashtags doesn't tell anybody what you edited and why.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131964901
map per (2023-02-10 16:52:04+00:00): REVERTED
marczoutendijk (2023-02-10 20:08:22+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6853

 
Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
map per (2023-02-01 20:32:27+00:00): Solved all problems introduced in this changeset (roads with unnecessarily many road segments)
silversurfer83 (2023-02-01 14:29:25+00:00): We have asked you frequently to react to our comments and to change your mapping style to our guidelines set forth within the wiki. You never react so I finally decided to report this behavior to the DWG
yasslay (2023-02-01 19:17:46+00:00): What has been done to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/337060413 is OBVIOUS vandalism. Reverting immediately.
silversurfer83 (2023-02-01 19:24:39+00:00): @ yasslay: Are you sure? What do you mean?
yasslay (2023-02-01 19:29:51+00:00): Upon further investigation of some of the ways included in this changeset (in particular, the UK), I found that the warnings shown in the changeset box above were because of the user dragging roads together and just ruining the geometry of the ways. It’s hard to describe, but you can check my most recent changesets to get more of an idea of what happened. I hope this helps.
user_8882856 (2023-02-01 19:33:17+00:00): Thanks for letting me know exactly. I will have a look 👍
marczoutendijk (2023-02-10 20:08:06+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6853

 
Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
eggie (2023-02-01 14:32:46+00:00): Wanneer je nu de validator zou draaien dan zie je waarom je de jeux de boulesbaan niet meer ziet.
gr eggie
tttnnn24 (2023-02-01 14:46:25+00:00): Die twee lege punten? Weet nog niet hoe ik de validator anders draai dan door een upload: die mopperde.
eggie (2023-02-01 14:50:41+00:00): Je kunt josm helemaal naar je eigen smaak inrichten. De validator heb ik bij de schermen rechts erbij gezet.
De 'pitch' rechtsonder heeft in de hoek kruisende wegen.
eggie (2023-02-01 14:52:16+00:00): Zodra je dat uit de knoop haalt zal het veld weer renderen. Lege punten kun je gewoon verwijderen.
tttnnn24 (2023-02-01 15:06:52+00:00): Ontdekte ik ja en ik heb het Validator gebeuren ook in de rechter kolom.
Thanks alweer!
eggie (2023-02-01 14:31:04+00:00): Welcome to OSM...  I changed the classification of the road into highway=residential and added the streetname.
Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2023-02-01 14:29:10+00:00): Hi  mustafa... I changed the classification into highway=service  
Greetz,
eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-06-16 12:39:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 137412856 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-06-16 12:39:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 137412856 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers
werbuli (2023-03-17 11:22:07+00:00): Hallo Hebit, hier ist der 'name' bereits am Schulgelände erfasst, habe ihn daher am Gebäude wieder gelöscht.
Jillis inactivE (2023-03-05 19:29:27+00:00): Hoi, er is een opmerking geplaatst over dit gebied: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3584331
Harfeur (2023-02-02 12:51:59+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue sur OpenStreetMap !

Pour indiquer qu'une route est temporairement fermée, il faut l'indiquer différemment car le but des données sur OpenStreetMap est d'avoir des données pérennes dans le temps.

Tu peux te référer à cette page pour avoir plus d'informations sur comment cartographier une route en travaux : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=construction#How_to_map_the_start_of_a_road_repair_or_reconstruction

Merci de me répondre afin de me dire si tu as fait les changements, ou si tu souhaites que je m'en occupe.

Je reste à ta disposition si tu as des questions.

~Harfeur
werbuli (2023-03-17 11:42:40+00:00): Hallo Hebit, hier - und auch bei der Haltestelle auf der anderen Straßenseite - ist bereits wie meist üblich ein 'shelter' 'covered' an der 'platform' erfasst. Einer kann weg .......https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:public_transport%3Dplatform
werbuli (2023-03-17 11:50:46+00:00): den way 230889371 hast du von path auf footway geändert. Das passt nicht zu traffic_sign 240. Siehe hier:  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen_kartieren
oder hier
http://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/

Aller Anfang ist schwer, lass dich nicht entmutigen :-)
Langlaeufer (2023-06-15 14:48:15+00:00): hab es jetzt wieder in Mehrzweckweg geändert
adrianojbr (2023-04-01 23:15:38+00:00): Qual a fonte para a mudança de nome da rua?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131966461
PumpkinPieAficionado (2023-04-04 23:25:42+00:00): Hello Adriano, the street name was added based on a local Maps user’s feedback.
adrianojbr (2023-04-05 00:06:36+00:00): 👍
Harfeur (2023-02-01 20:55:46+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue sur OpenStreetMap !

Malheureusement, il y a beaucoup trop d'erreurs et ton éditeur t'en a averti. Je me permets donc d'annuler toutes tes modifications.

OpenStreetMap n'est pas un jeu ou un terrain pour faire des expérimentations. Il s'agit d'un site utilisé par de nombreuses applications, et les modifications peuvent avoir des répercussions négatives.

Comme tu sembles être en SNT, je t'invite à venir en message privé afin que je prenne contact avec ton enseignante pour lui indiquer les différentes ressources que nous avons mis à disposition pour cette matière.

~Harfeur

#Révoqué dans #131978085
Cdrik_69 (2023-02-02 08:43:39+00:00): Merci Harfeur !
Cdrik_69 (2023-02-02 08:42:50+00:00): Bonjour Tom,

La base de données OpenStreetMap n'est pas un terrain de jeux. 
Pouvez-vous me donner votre lycée afin que je lui envoie cet article : 
https://dane.ac-lyon.fr/spip/bonnes-pratiques-osm-en-snt

Merci par avance !
Harfeur (2023-02-02 10:51:46+00:00): Bonjour Tom et bienvenue sur OpenStreetMap !

J'ai révoqué tes modifications car elles sont incorrectes et même si certaines peuvent être vraies, ton groupe de modifications ne permet pas de certifier que certaines modifications sont bien correctes et non farfelues.

~Harfeur

#Révoqué dans #131997361
GinaroZ (2023-02-14 17:52:27+00:00): You've tagged this the wrong way about, should be highway=construction + construction=footway
chris_debian (2023-02-14 18:45:38+00:00): Thanks for the heads-up, I'll try to revert the change, tonight.

Chris
GinaroZ (2023-02-14 23:49:12+00:00): Well actually looking at it, seems like people are walking on the path and Strava's heatmap shows lots of activity - so it's probably back open since the edit 7 years ago!
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-08 20:39:12+00:00): Please use better changeset comments.  What exactly did you do?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Rainero (2023-04-19 19:25:19+00:00): Hallo masse_BKG,

hier ist bestimmt eine Verwechslung passiert. Havixbeck liegt 350 km weiter nördlich.

Viele Grüße,
Rainer
emersonveenstra (2023-03-01 13:19:12+00:00): Hi,

You created this way with no tags, could you please tag it? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1137010388#map=18/33.87281/-112.09544

Thanks!
emersonveenstra (2023-03-01 13:19:29+00:00): Also this way: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1137010398
emersonveenstra (2023-03-01 13:20:17+00:00): and also this one: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1137010397
Frog23 (2023-02-01 15:27:52+00:00): Why are you removing the addresses from a lot of the shops, restaurants, etc?
Snusmumriken (2023-02-01 16:00:42+00:00): I don't believe I've removed any address from the database, but I strive to have the addresses to be unique.
Frog23 (2023-02-03 09:20:58+00:00): OK, I see now how you handled the addresses/house numbers. Two days ago I just noticed that you removed the addresses on some POIs and was wondering about that. Never mind then.
yellowdairis (2023-02-02 20:24:48+00:00): Where exactly was the problem?
pitscheplatsch (2023-02-04 13:17:39+00:00): Just a test?

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
Hüpfer22 (2023-02-06 07:42:00+00:00): Test for a superior program, negative impact on OSM?
pitscheplatsch (2023-03-04 11:52:17+00:00): Hi,

please don't add test data to the live OSM Server. If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
kucai (2023-07-22 07:11:27+00:00): why are changing the highways to service?
rene78 (2023-07-22 07:53:17+00:00): Because the only purpose of streets in gated communities is for residents to drive to their house. No through going traffic and irrelevant for everyone else.
kucai (2023-07-22 15:33:38+00:00): You ever read the discussion on local tagging practice regarding service roads?
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-06 14:55:26+00:00): Building outlines look good.  FYI, you can square buildings by pressing "q" on the keyboard.  This will snap the angles to 90 degrees after putting the areas in.

Keep up the good work!
MxxCon (2023-02-05 04:42:42+00:00): Hello.
This edit have been fully reverted for being completely wrong.
"Description" and "Keywords" are not valid OSM tags.
Your changed addresses are completely wrong for a POI located in NEW YORK CITY!
The format of open_hours tag is incorrect.
The format of phone tag is incorrect.
If you want to contribute data to OSM, please make sure that it is correct, accurate and follows OSM rules.
If you continue to intentionally make incorrect edits your account will be referred to DWG which can result in temporary or permanent block.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131968411
muralito (2023-02-09 18:45:48+00:00): cerrajeria es craft=locksmith. Arreglado.
user_18386847 (2023-02-09 21:39:11+00:00): Gracias
muralito (2023-02-09 18:41:42+00:00): esto es office=it. Arreglado.
user_18386847 (2023-02-09 21:39:31+00:00): Gracias
eggie (2023-02-01 16:03:09+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Feedback  Gezien de waarschuwing lijkt mij iets niet goed te zijn gegaan.
Ik kijk even...  
Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-02-01 16:07:19+00:00): Hier zijn alle routerelaties nu stuk en ook de routering. 
Ik draai even deze changeset terug. 
Geef even wat meer informatie...  dan kunnen we helpen. Dit is niet iets om als starter mee te beginnen.
eggie (2023-02-01 16:11:47+00:00): reverted by changeset #131969482
Dit zal toch echt door een ervaren mapper moeten worden gedaan.
Het is complex door de 6 OV routes en 2 U routes
eggie (2023-02-01 16:13:08+00:00): Dit waren je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=131969075
eggie (2023-02-01 16:18:54+00:00): Op 17 jan lijkt de weg nog niet opengesteld 
De meest actuele sat foto https://www.satellietdataportaal.nl/?base=openstreetmap&res=0.5&datemin=01-02-2022&loc=51.40064%2C5.480070%2C18z&overlay=mos-0&marker=loc&acqdate=2023-01-17&acqid=20230117_110045_SV1-03&sensor=SuperView-1
eggie (2023-02-01 16:29:02+00:00): https://www.duurzaamdoorwaalre.nl/documenten/
eggie (2023-02-01 16:32:51+00:00): Ik heb even een note geplaatst op het traject.. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3540944
eggie (2023-02-01 16:37:16+00:00): https://www.duurzaamdoorwaalre.nl/data/downloadables/2/1/0/4/definitief-ontwerp-eindhovenseweg-fase-2.pdf
eggie (2023-02-01 16:54:12+00:00): Hoe zit het met de ventweg aan de nooroostkant. Die had je deels laten staan? Maar daar kon je alleen maar uitrijden gezien de eenrichting.
warnings:impossible_oneway:highway
muralito (2023-02-09 18:37:02+00:00): Esa forma de etiquetar esta en desuso. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:amenity=nursing_home

Arreglado.
user_18386847 (2023-02-09 21:42:23+00:00): Gracias
maraf24 (2023-02-03 21:47:20+00:00): Dlaczego zniszczyłeś drogę rowerową na Buforowej? Nie jest ona w budowie już od ponad miesiąca.
maraf24 (2023-02-03 21:48:22+00:00): Wycofane.
mawutor (2023-02-02 04:03:53+00:00): Hello Christian, welcome to the community, happy to see you contribution in this campaign, one thing kindly remember to add a brief comments to your changeset before you upload. 

eg. added buildings in Accra #lovemaps #28for28 #ugym #osmghana

thank you
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131969616
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-18 20:09:24+00:00): A lot of these golfcart paths are duplicates.
A67-A67 (2023-02-03 00:00:43+00:00): Bedankt voor het toevoegen. De oorspronkelijke tagging met place=suburb was wel correct voor stadsdelen, daarom heb ik die tag hersteld. In Nederland is de gebruikelijke hiërarchie binnen steden en dorpen: suburb, quarter, neighbourhood. Place=borough is een wat obscure tag, die in Nederland niet gebruikt wordt.

Openstreetmap gebruikt Brits-Engels, niet Amerikaans-Engels. Daardoor betekent suburb ook een stadsdeel in het centrum, niet slechts een buitenwijk of voorstad.
JASMein03M (2023-02-03 00:27:35+00:00): Aha, bedankt voor je verbetering!
Ik kon hier op de wiki niks over vinden, maar dan weet ik dat nu voor de volgende keer :)
JASMein03M (2023-02-03 00:46:00+00:00): Enige wat wel mss als inconsistent kan worden gezien is dat dit op Wikipedia en Wikidata wel "boroughs" worden genoemd. Maar zou kunnen dat deze artikelen inmiddels veroudert zijn sinds de afschaffing van de deelgemeenten.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urban_districts_of_the_Netherlands
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q15079751
A67-A67 (2023-02-04 22:17:59+00:00): Het verschil met de naamgeving op Wikipedia is geen een probleem. Ik zie zelfs staan "and can therefore be regarded as boroughs or wards.", dus Wikipedia noemt ze niet expliciet boroughs. 

Bij Openstreetmap-tags is het vooral belangrijk dat ze universeel genoeg zijn. 

Veel GIS-systemen gebruiken getallen voor dit soort classificaties, maar Openstreetmap gebruikt vanwege laagdrempeligheid woorden. Daarbij krijgt een tag als place=suburb dus ongeveer dezelfde betekenis overal ter wereld, ook al gebruikt een bepaalde stad een ander woord om een stadsdeel aan te duiden.
Langlaeufer (2023-02-01 20:48:38+00:00): "Begehen auf eigene Gefahr" heißt permissive (geduldet) und nicht private (geschlossener Personenkreis)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131970001
Đuro Jiří (2023-07-17 12:54:36+00:00): Ciao Francesca,
ho trovato ennesima DINAclub - Stazione di Ricarica e-Bike, che NON ESISTE.
eggie (2023-02-01 16:58:17+00:00): Dag Bob.. Je vraagt feedback
access=private was juist correct en emergency=yes overruled die privatetag.
Het zou dus gewoon moeten werken door de brandweer. Nu routeert het voor iedereen.
MVH
eggie
eggie (2023-02-01 17:25:20+00:00): access=private teruggezet...   emergency=yes zal routeren voor de hulpdiensten.
MVG
eggie
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-03-20 19:52:44+00:00): Nice fix for nonames, was this some automated change?

There are some small strange things like Aru loosing wikidata
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/8016649/history

Not sure that this road should have lost tracktype https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/641957435/history
Of course it's a bit confusing since it's not a track anymore, but I think it should be ok to have it since highway tag is about purpose of the road.

Tasuja pst https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30908948/history
1) highway=footway and bicycle=designated are uncommon tag combination which should be avoided, this I've fixed right away
2) Tallinn GIS thinks this street does have a name https://gis.tallinn.ee/veebikaart/ (I'm not sure if anyone has asked permission to use their data, but that can be done). I'll try to check if there are any street signs.

You can also check why the highway type was changed here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/130798351
Pikse (2023-03-21 09:04:05+00:00): way/8016649 – I moved wikidata tag to a relation.

way/641957435 – I had an impression that tracktype goes together with highway=track, but now I read that it may be used for other road types as well. Alright then, I try to remember not to remove it in similar cases in future.

way/30908948 – earlier when I checked it I found Tasuja puiestee from Teeregister where its extent matches this:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/79744287
So this name for that another way seemed like yet another case where user sort of carelessly copies name from some adjacent road (in order to silence some validator I quess). I didn't know that gis.tallinn.ee/veebikaart might have different data. Though, I suspect that this map (in part) derives its road data from OSM.

As for road type, highway=pedestrian seemed a bit odd to me too in this location, and based that other discussion which you refer I figured that I'll just restore highway=footway. I quess highway=path is also fine.

No, my edit wasn't automated. I occasionally just check the integrity of road relations (with the help of some queries), and when doing so a few other suspicious stuff also catches my eye on the map.
dgmapping (2023-03-21 10:11:08+00:00): Tasuja pst - I have surveyed it and I can confirm there are street signs on the non-motor traffic sections of the "highway".

It is also listed in kohanimeregister:
https://xgis.maaamet.ee/knravalik/knr?obj_id=100262799

Not sure why it's not properly listed in Teeregister.

gis.tallinn.ee/veebikaart - this is completely separate source. In some instances it can have more detailed and more accurate information than Maa-amet. But the license is currently not compatible with OSM, since it requires attribution: https://www.tallinn.ee/et/geoportaal/geoportaali-litsentsileping
Pikse (2023-03-21 11:54:59+00:00): You mean along this way there are street signs that have street name on it in particular? Alright, I suppose we can rely on this. Thanks for clarifying.  In case of such exceptional and confusing sourcing circumstances it would be nice to use source:name=suvery or something like that to avoid confusion.

I now notice that "Tallinna kohalike teede nimekiri" gives 1651 m as the lenght of Tasuja puiestee. This also suggests that the road is longer than the object shown in Teeregister. Ideally we should find a source that has the exact and correct extent of this named object.

I tried to find some documenation on gis.tallinn.ee/veebikaart to assess its reliablity but currently didn't find anything useful. As for licensing, I don't think its relevant here as long we use given source to check an individual piece of factual information.
dgmapping (2023-03-21 12:22:34+00:00): Yes, there are "Tasuja pst" signs between Mustakivi tee and Saaremaa pst sections.

If you want assess the reliability of Tallinna veebikaart then you can download GIS files with additional metadata:
https://www.tallinn.ee/et/geoportaal/ruumiandmed
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-03-24 20:04:42+00:00): Can confirm that there are signs "on the ground". Added name and source:name=suvery.
Intrinsical (2023-06-05 18:50:32+00:00): (was reverted in changeset 132091705)
ctrl-alt-k (2023-11-14 12:57:35+00:00): Bună, clădirea de la cap de linie nu se numește „Cap Linie 102”, din câte știu nu are o denumire proprie, capul de linie de aici e deja mapat ca stație de autobuz și se numește pur și simplu „Faleză Nord”.
dodelinho (2023-11-14 17:11:09+00:00): Buna, pe clădire chiar scria mare asta acum ceva timp, vezi de exemplu http://www.transport-in-comun.ro/constanta/statii/Dispecerat-102-001.jpg . Îți convine să îl trec la old_name ?