piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Vaidotas (2025-06-23 14:41:59+00:00): Kodėl https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/39456428 ir https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/143016917 uždaryta? Jei dėl kelio remonto darbų, tai reiktų palikti highway žymas su papildžius atitinkama construction žyma. O jei atkarpa ardoma, tai reikia nuimti ir visas su keliais susijusias žymas, pvz. oneway ir kt.
Pataisykite, jei klystu, bet duomenų į OSM iš Google maps kopijuoti negalima.
AT Mapfixer (2025-06-26 20:35:44+00:00): The street is closed of by guide rails, but the road has not been completely dismantled.

You can see this on the current satellite image from google maps.
fortera_au (2025-07-15 12:30:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168963114 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: incorrect source, no valid source provided
DiogoBaptista98 (2025-08-03 02:13:56+00:00): Mapeou a rotunda da Rua Augusto Gil sem qualquer tag apropriada e ainda com sentido invertido.. situação corrigida
LaLinea (2025-06-21 19:29:06+00:00): Neues Gebäude erfasst:  https://osm.org/changeset/167927378
Dawid2849 (2025-06-22 09:14:28+00:00): Cześć, w przypadku dróg track, potocznie zwanych "trackami" bardzo ważnym znacznikiem jest tracktype (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:tracktype?uselang=pl), który określa stopień utwardzenia drogi. Na jego podstawie routingi określają trasy dla danego rodzaju i preferencji danego użytkownika. Pozwoliłem sobie dodać ten znacznik na końcówce ul. Świerkowej, gdyż w przypadku asfaltu wartość to zawsze grade1 (nawet wtedy, gdy jest bardzo rozwalony, bo takie rzeczy określa się za pomocą smoothness) :)
Paweł_M (2025-06-22 17:12:38+00:00): ok, będę o tym pamiętał, gdybym znów gdzieś zmieniał nawierzchnię na asfalt
A67-A67 (2025-06-21 22:09:37+00:00): Hi,
In the Netherlands addresses are tagged on the address node, not on the building. This change moves the address to the building. I've reverted that.
Romwriter (2025-06-21 19:33:01+00:00): (siehe auch https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/358821)
eggie (2025-06-21 20:53:20+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
StC (2025-06-27 16:10:21+00:00): Bonjour,

il me semble que ce changeset a créé un trou dans un itinéraire pédestre qui passe par là. Je m'occupe de le reboucher.
SpinOff (2025-06-21 21:45:54+00:00): Hej. O co chodzi z operatorem "karlica"?
Sylabowy Kot (2025-06-21 20:10:03+00:00): Przestań znowu podawać samą kropkę w opisie zmian.
NieWnen (2025-06-21 23:43:53+00:00): Nie dość, że kropka to jeszcze usunięty przystanek + wiata, żeby dodać ponownie sam przystanek (mniej szczegółowy) – zmiana bezsensowna. 
Jeśli już to można było rozdzielić obiekty i jeden zostawić.

Przywróciłem poprzednie i wydzieliłem wiatę na obszar.
rempshaener (2025-06-21 21:20:59+00:00): Hallo,
ohne mich mit der Unterscheidung von tram, subway oder light_rail auch nur annähernd auszukennen: Das hat hier gerade den Anflug eines beginnenden Editwar. Erst umstellen und dann darum bitten, es nicht zu revertieren, ist vielleicht nicht der beste Weg.
Am Beispiel von www.osm.org/way/400435516: Erst in 11/2023 wurde die Strecke auf subway umgestellt, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144430766. Warum nicht einfach einen Kommentar eröffnen und es  in Ruhe ausdiskutieren?
Viele Grüße
Znaika (2025-06-22 12:27:55+00:00): :-)
Geomaus 123 (2025-06-22 19:29:49+00:00): Gerne! Ausdiskutieren ist der Beste weg einen Editwar zu verhindern.
Vollis (2025-08-01 21:16:45+00:00): Dass die K-Bahn insgesamt (anders als die offizielle Nummerierung vorspiegelt) keine U-Bahn ist, scheint mir offensichtlich. Was mir gegen den Strich geht, ist der starre Ausgangspunkt, dass die Linien unbedingt einheitlich kategorisiert werden sollen. Wer hat sich sowas ausgedacht? Wieso können wir nicht die schlichte Tatsache darstellen, dass in der Krefelder Innenstadt eine Straßenbahn fährt, zwischen Krefeld und Düsseldorf eine Stadtbahn und in der Düsseldorfer Innenstadt eine U-Bahn? Vorliegend ist das jetzt doppelt dämlich, weil dadurch auf dem Ostwall plötzlich aus der SWK-Linie 041, die ansonsten – korrekt – als Straßenbahn kartiert ist, eine Stadtbahn wird. Die Schienen sind zwar nicht dieselben, aber nur wegen der Spurbreite; wir können sie unmöglich getrennt kartieren, denn die SWK-Schienen liegen vollständig zwischen den Rheinbahn-Schienen. Das als Stadtbahn zu deklarieren, ergibt m.E. nicht den geringsten Sinn.
SpinOff (2025-06-21 21:36:57+00:00): Hej. Przypominam się w sprawie prawidłowego opisywania zestawów zmian: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
KarlaIbrahić (2025-06-23 11:50:57+00:00): Reverted because incorrectly tagged #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167999685
NeisBot (2025-06-28 14:45:47+00:00): Hi naxngiga, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 98% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 16 highway(s)
- 1 waterway(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=167928951
NeisReview (2025-06-30 07:03:32+00:00): Thank you for your private message, your explanations and confirming that your deletions were intentional.
fortera_au (2025-07-15 12:30:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168963114 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: incorrect source, no valid source provided
Fizzie-DWG (2025-06-22 02:34:03+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18379
eggie (2025-06-21 21:17:05+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
rempshaener (2025-06-21 21:03:46+00:00): Hallo,

die Schieber sind
pipeline=valve
substance=water
Hier bitte nicht den emergency-Namensraum verwenden.

Die Namen müssen raus, Hydranten oder Straßeneinbauten im Allgemeinen haben keine Namen. Description reicht doch sicherlich?

Viele Grüße
BubbaJuice (2025-06-21 20:31:22+00:00): DOI link:
https://doi.org/10.3133/fs20173035
FMC-Henri (2025-06-30 11:27:46+00:00): Hallo A Kue,

danke für den neuen Radweg. Du hast allerdings die Tags an der Straße nicht entfernt ( z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4796538 ) Da sich diese widersprechen mit deien Angaben auf dem Radweg - könntest du diese bitte korrekt abändern?

Danke und Grüße
Henri
eggie (2025-06-21 21:18:58+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback  Zou het pand ook geen adres meer hebben. Dat heb je ook verwijderd. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-06-21 21:20:44+00:00): Adres hersteld..
eggie (2025-06-21 21:22:57+00:00): Ger.. een tip.. Niet de BAGdata verwijderen svp.
source	BAG	
source:date	2020-06-15

MVG
eggie
ger123 (2025-06-21 21:32:04+00:00): Ah foutje inderdaad. Ik ga er op letten, bedankt voor het herstel.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-07-03 05:13:10+00:00): DWG revert - inexplicable mapping & unknown sources

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168425628
A67-A67 (2025-06-21 21:22:50+00:00): De school Op Dreef stond al met uitgebreide gegevens op de kaart. Deze toevoeging is dubbelop.
GeenIdee0865 (2025-06-21 21:30:01+00:00): Ahh, niet gezien!
eggie (2025-06-21 21:28:45+00:00): Beste GI  Geef in je commentaar svp aan wat je hebt aangepast.
'Little thing ' zegt helemaal niemand iets.
Is het hele traject een parkeerplaats?

MVG
eggie
GeenIdee0865 (2025-06-21 21:35:11+00:00): Het pad is prive en is bedoeld om langs de weg te parkeren
eggie (2025-06-21 21:36:56+00:00): Oke.. duidelijk.
Ik heb wel aan de noordzijde een hek geplaatst met motor_vehicle=no en de aansluiting aangepast
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:33:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168127729 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 09:01:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
eggie (2025-06-21 21:41:31+00:00): Oke, maar dan 
source	BAG	
source:date	2014-03-24
graag behouden.
Die adresnodes zijn directe import vanuit het Kadaster.
Soms zijn gegevens nog nodig voor updates.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-06-21 21:43:02+00:00): Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=167931235
Ik heb de BAGdata hersteld
LordGarySugar (2025-11-03 01:01:10+00:00): Hi, could you check the housenumbers that you added here? It doesn't really make sense for the terrace to be numbered 18 -> 10 -> 14... Thanks
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:33:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168127729 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:57:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
Lostmonkey (2025-07-03 05:36:25+00:00): What does this mean? I don't understand what it has to do with these parking lots that I mapped?
Fizzie-DWG (2025-07-03 06:05:03+00:00): My apologies! I don't know how, but your valid edit was somehow copied into the list of incorrect changes from another User to be reverted? Please leave it with me while I do some checking!
Fizzie-DWG (2025-07-03 06:11:49+00:00): It turns out that CS 167931643 was supposed to be reverted, but your CS was picked up instead! I don't know how as all the CS numbers were copy/pasted, not individually entered, so we'll be looking further into that? I can re-map these 4 carparks for you, if you like?
Lostmonkey (2025-07-03 06:15:33+00:00): As far As I can tell the parking lots are still on the map. I don't see what was actually reverted.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-07-03 06:31:16+00:00): Looking at it, you originally mapped these 4 carparks in CS 167931447 just as amenity=parking, then in this CS you added parking=surface. It's that bit which has been reverted, but they're still there as amenity=parking only!
Lostmonkey (2025-07-03 06:36:57+00:00): Ok. I was also there in person but I no longer remember the surface type.
GeeMaps! (2025-07-03 07:05:11+00:00): No, that's parking=surface as in open, ground-level parking, not whether its asphalt, concrete etc.
Lostmonkey (2025-07-03 07:13:23+00:00): Ah yes of course. Re-added.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-07-03 23:36:37+00:00): Thanks! :-)
VLD549 (2025-06-22 13:55:09+00:00): Hi, the highlighted street - between Van Zeggelenlaan and Schoolmeesterstraat is called Van den Broekstraat according to both BAG and Bing Maps.
How can I add a screenshot of what I see, in order to show you?

Thank you
A67-A67 (2025-06-22 19:10:01+00:00): Hi, You can't upload images in the OSM notes system. So you could use an external image sharing website (e.g. Imgur, Flickr) to share the screenshot.

We generally share links directly to the OSM object, like such https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/7480310
VLD549 (2026-03-14 07:41:44+00:00): Thank you.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-07-03 06:06:29+00:00): DWG revert - inexplicable mapping & unknown sources

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168428256
eggie (2025-06-21 21:45:56+00:00): Top!   Hier ging het correct.
mapse
Fizzie-DWG (2025-07-03 05:14:36+00:00): DWG revert - inexplicable mapping & unknown sources

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168425701
eggie (2025-06-22 05:56:37+00:00): Dag Ger... dan dus second_hand=only

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:second_hand%3Donly

Kijk je nog even..
MVG
eggie
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-04-30 10:22:13+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1084945478/history has building = razed that was added in this edit
If it is really razed, it should be deleted (maybe, for some time, mapped as razed:building= ). If it is not razed then building=razed is wrong
Baloo Uriza (2026-04-30 12:08:26+00:00): OK, but then someone else will just remap it because they see it on the aerial still.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-04-30 12:21:29+00:00): then razed:building=yes would stop that and can be kept as long as it is visible on standard aerials
Baloo Uriza (2026-04-30 12:39:03+00:00): Updated.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-04-30 13:17:18+00:00): Thanks!
b-jazz (2025-06-23 02:32:11+00:00): Hey BB,

Thanks for contributing to the map. Please be aware that you need to attach the fairway to the green in situations like this hole. That means that you need to *share* every node at the boundary of the two objects. Thanks!

Have fun mapping and golfing.
MarcoR (2025-06-22 04:26:47+00:00): Hi Mappy21!

Is it really a shop selling "table tennis" tables or just a table where you can play "table tennis"? 
In the latter case I think you could use leisure=pitch instead of shop=sport (see the wiki for more info: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpitch#Examples)

Happy mapping,
Marco
eggie (2025-06-22 05:51:55+00:00): Reverted by changeset #167938335

Ger .. 
Ik heb deze aanpassing teruggedraaid. 
Er is hier geen apart fietspad, maar het is getagd als fietsstrook. cycleway:left=lane
Ga er van uit dat veel hier allemaal correct gemapt is.

De tagging zit in de busbaan en in de hoofdrijbaan. Daar loopt ook de fietsroute naar het noorden.
Het fietspad naar het zuiden is wel gescheiden door een rand en bevat de andere fietsrouterelatie. 
Ga steeds in de historie na waarom dit zo gemapt is en neem desnoods contact op het voorgaande mapper. Die zal het uitleggen. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-06-22 05:54:06+00:00): Helaas kunnen nog niet alle routers en kaarten omgaan met busways. Het is wat het is.
ger123 (2025-06-22 20:30:11+00:00): Bedankt weer voor het herstel. Ik ga er goed op letten.
RailandSea (2025-06-24 06:25:27+00:00): The Line name and the Ref Tag are incorrect that was the reason I did the revert. I only made it main originally to reflect the entire NCRR trackage.
clay_c (2025-06-25 22:59:40+00:00): Hi X86355, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

This appears to be a revert of changeset 157648697. When we revert others' mapping work, it's important to notify the original mapper via changeset comment. Otherwise, we end up with edit wars, and the reverted work may end up being reinstated.
mbeyerle (2025-06-21 21:57:28+00:00): related: https://www.clearwaterconservancy.org/article/2019/09/19/clearwater-conservancy-awarded-grant-to-conserve-windy-hill-farm
o_andras (2025-06-22 10:46:43+00:00): Linking to related note: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3850329
StC (2025-06-27 16:01:30+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changeset semble avoir brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre qui passe par là (au sud de la Passerelle du Charentonneau). Est-ce que cela correspond à une interruption réelle sur le terrain ?
ajulien (2025-06-27 16:13:56+00:00): Bonjour,

Oui, la promenade est interrompue au niveau de la Passerelle de Charentonneau, toute la zone est en gros travaux (j'ai mis des tag "noexit" pour essayer de montrer que cette interruption était intentionnelle de ma part). Sur place il y a des panneaux pour indiquer qu'il faut passer par l'Avenue Foch, mais je pense pas qu'on puisse considérer que ça fasse partie de la promenade Paul Cézanne.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-07-04 23:49:58+00:00): Hello agentcodec & welcome to OSM! A question for you here. You've added a footpath from Park Way across to King George Blvd, but then marked it as foot=private, which means that the general public can't use it? Is that correct?
agentcodec (2025-07-05 01:04:00+00:00): Hello,

I'm not actually entirely sure. The footpath that exists used to be gated to residents with a key provided by the community, but recently they removed the locks entirely. The gate is still there but it's only protected by a keyless doorknob. As it leads into private property I've marked it as a private access footpath. I could be wrong about the proper designation however so please correct it if I'm wrong!
Fizzie-DWG (2025-07-05 04:13:21+00:00): Hi. Thanks for that! Under those circumstances, I'd probably agree with you, so good choice! Please keep up the good work & have fun mapping!
0235 (2025-06-22 09:33:02+00:00): Thank you for noticing and fixing. I really hate it when that happens, as JOSM auto suggests UK, so i am none the wiser.
os-emmer (2025-06-22 11:13:46+00:00): According to the OSM-wiki
(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:country) and wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_3166-1) "GB" is the right country code for the United Kingdom. The JOSM-preset for adresses suggests "GB" but not "UK" for me. Where does JOSM suggest "UK" to you?
0235 (2025-06-22 15:47:45+00:00): Strange. When i fill out addr:country in JOSM, it will sometimes auto suggest "UK" instead of GB.

I appreciate you correcting my mistake though, you spotted them only after I originally mapped these areas, and I would have not been aware. Thank you :)
os-emmer (2025-06-22 16:49:23+00:00): Maybe you once added "UK" manually and JOSM remebers this?

No problem. I fiddled around with my maproulette-challenge for finding wrong ISO-country-codes (https://maproulette.org/browse/challenges/52083) and than I saw about 600 hits for this area. Thank you for adding the data in the first place. Adding 600+ addresses is a lot of work, correcting two letters in a mass-edit is only a matter of minutes.
Brad10281 (2025-06-21 22:47:53+00:00): Came across this while out riding my side-by-side. Once you come out of the trees, it's clearly a two-track through someone's property. Wasn't comfortable proceeding, so we turned around and took Camp 8 Rd around.
CAM-Gerlach (2025-06-23 00:57:37+00:00): RIP that Moe's. Honestly, a bit surprised it lasted as long as it did. I hardly ever saw anyone in there, even when the Cellar, the Chipotle up the street and the Qdoba in Lavery Hall would have lines out the door.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167933228
CAM-Gerlach (2025-06-23 00:51:09+00:00): Hey, looks like the `name` was deleted; was that intentional? Judging from the WiFi name that was added, seems to me like it might not be?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167933333
Stephen304 (2025-06-23 00:59:40+00:00): Thanks for catching that! I was editing on the go and apparently scrolling down on iD on a touchscreen doesn't block the tag delete button from being pressed by the swipe. I've added back the name
CAM-Gerlach (2025-06-23 18:50:59+00:00): No worries, it happens! I make enough mistakes as it is on desktop even with an extensive safety net of JOSM, Osmose, OSMI, KR and custom validator rules that I don't trust myself to edit on mobile, hehe
bxl-forever (2025-06-22 10:16:34+00:00): Hello,

Kraiinem is one of the municipalities with facilities.

In 2024, the Belgium OSM community voted to use bilingual names there for addresses.
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/language-facilities-how-do-we-map-them/108026/25

I am aware that QA tools report unmatching data between streets and buildings, but the current "best practice" we should apply is precisely to use bilingual names on both (nl - fr in this area).

Kind regards.
MarkpageBxl (2025-06-22 10:20:51+00:00): Ok, thanks for the feedback. Was unaware of the policy defined for linguistic facilities, apologies!
mueschel (2025-06-23 09:48:36+00:00): Hi,
I'm confused about these tags. Why is the axle load so much higher for double and triple axles? That means a truck with triple axle can be six times as heavy as one with a single axle? Or is this the maxweight, in case of a triple axle?
UncleZhanger (2025-06-23 10:28:17+00:00): It’s the combined load for tandem axle(2 axles close together) and tri-axle(3 axles close together) configuration. Not per single axle but per axle group.
mueschel (2025-06-23 11:31:03+00:00): Thanks! 
'maxaxleweight' is per axle. The limit here is a 'maxweight:conditional'. 
There are already several in the database like 

maxweight:conditional = 18 @ (bogie:axles = 2); 24 @ (bogie:axles = 3)
UncleZhanger (2025-06-23 18:01:06+00:00): Thanks. I’ve updated it.
eggie (2025-06-22 10:35:09+00:00): Dag Wandel Appeltje..
Hier zie je waar de landuse niet meer aansluit of verkeerd is geschoten omdat je een node op een hoek verwijderde.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=167933513

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-06-22 10:41:28+00:00): Je kunt zo'n hoeknode naar een andere hoeknode slepen en dan druk je op de M toets (merge)
Wandel-Appeltje (2025-06-22 20:34:15+00:00): ja het was me vandaag ook al opgevallen.  
Ik ga het (proberen) aan te passen maar er zitten wat raar gevormde objecten tussen..

Bij het in- + uitzoomen van openstreetmap valt me wel op dat verschillende zoom levels verschillende 'versies' hebben... hoe zit dat precies? wordt dat gecached en gerefreshed?
Wandel-Appeltje (2025-06-22 20:38:08+00:00): Initiele verbetering zit nu in changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167975303#map=18/51.535619/5.498851

Maar ik ga nog even na-controleren of alles nu OK er uit zien.
eggie (2025-06-22 20:38:51+00:00): Hoi,

Dat ligt aan je eigen cache van je browser. Je kunt steeds op het niveau waar het 'achterloopt' in rendering even CTRL-F5 toetsen. Je eigen cache leegmaken.

MVG
eggie
fortera_au (2025-06-22 09:59:06+00:00): Hi there, this should be club=sport and sport=rugby_union, not leisure=sports_centre
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167933720
GDXX (2025-06-21 23:30:13+00:00): 250 character limit cut off my comment!
Here are the references as provided above:
https://stanwix-rural.parish.uk/planning-applications/ (as of 22/06/25 Houghton House Farm appears in the recent planning applications page). Here is another confirmation that may remain more static: https://planning.org.uk/app/81/_CARLI_DCAPR_85895

Using Cumberland Council Highways map the diversion is confirmed and the PROW code for this is 132015 (ref: https://cumberland.highway-iams.uk/Live/PBLC/PIP/?cg=networks - use 'Houghton House Farm' in the address bar)
GDXX (2025-06-21 23:31:37+00:00): Another reference here:
https://planning.org.uk/app/81/_CARLI_DCAPR_82076/
stillhart (2026-03-17 22:02:27+00:00): please check for duplicates before importing...
Allison P (2025-06-22 14:36:24+00:00): Owyhee County is starting to look pretty awesome! I'm curious: if I mapped all the addresses in Canyon County, would that encourage you to map farms and landuse there too?
barkerid (2025-06-22 14:44:10+00:00): Yea, I'm open to it.  Hoping to work my way down to Grandview.  But I'd love to fill in the Sunnyslope area, and areas west of Caldwell need a lot of work too.
user_5359 (2025-06-24 09:27:26+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't add any private nummeration like Field 1, Field 2.
GDXX (2025-06-22 00:11:29+00:00): Using Cumberland Highway IAMS website confirms no footpath here. 
Signs are marked upon entrance to the path stating there is no footpath here. 

Discussions on Facebook confirm local concerns over legitimacy of the footpath being closed dated back to 2021 (ref: https://www.facebook.com/spottedcarlislenew/posts/the-footpath-cycle-path-leading-from-burgh-road-industrial-towards-the-river-ede/1829907340499487/). 
Archived link for Facebook post (ref: https://archive.is/wLYfU).

A document concerning proposed modifications and inclusion of the footpath can be found here (ref: https://www.carlisle.gov.uk/Portals/0/Documents/PDF/PF10971%20Burgh%20Road.pdf?ver=hh9E90KPF_jcGcHr8Oh8Bg%3d%3d) however no correspondence can be found and seemingly no updates made to the public right of way/footpath map found here (ref: https://cumberland.highway-iams.uk/Live/PBLC/PIP/?cg=networks)
user_5359 (2025-06-24 09:33:46+00:00): Welcome to OSM! PLEASE BE CAREFUL! You move some node over 100 meters (street crossing streets and buildings). I must remove this changeset. Please try it again (and take smaller areas)!
Supaplex (2025-06-22 05:34:56+00:00): 這裡？
www.openstreetmap.org/way/965305394
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167934689