piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
GPS-GR (2024-10-28 22:58:22+00:00): Hi emersonveenstra..
Hope you saw my reference to start a discussion on this ChangeSet. Your earlier instructions were 100% correct. I took your lead and found OSM instructions about "Lane assist/Examples/Motorway exit" 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lane_assist/Examples/Motorway_exit

Of the 3 motorway phases I added a node and made a split to create the #2 phase.

The example said to change lane to 3  and add Tag: turn:lanes=none|none|slight_rightturn

Destination Tag was already present on the off ramp.

I would like to add a Destination to the far right lane of the #2 phase. But OSM guide didn't mention that.

I hope this edit on phase #2 section before the exit junction  is picked up by my GPS App.  I'll try to return after app updates their maps and share if this edit helped provide more advanced turn notice from my GPS App.

Appreciate your help..
I should be good to go with future edits.
emersonveenstra (2024-10-31 10:39:23+00:00): Thanks,

One small thing, it's just "slight_right", not "slight_rightturn", but other than that looks good!
GPS-GR (2024-10-31 11:31:24+00:00): Hi  emersonveenstra 
Thanks for spotting my typo.
Made correction you noticed:
Tag: [ turn:lanes = slight_right] 
Changeset: 158576122

Now this exit should be good.
I also updated my notes as a reminder.

My sincere thanks. 
take care..
huntertur (2024-11-20 19:36:43+00:00): For the path on the west side of Lincoln Memorial Drive that goes underneath 794: There is a Bike Path sign at the northern end, a Bike Route sign partway down the path, and bicycle symbols painted on the path near its southern end (where cyclists must switch to the painted bike lanes). Do you have any concerns if I restore bicycle=designated for this path?
BPTT (2024-11-20 23:09:18+00:00): Do you mean https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/683798300/ or in that area? Not at all, and my apologies! A huge oversight on my part (and the City's and County's for not making that a more useful thoroughfare!)
huntertur (2024-11-21 20:04:18+00:00): Yep, that one! (and associated other ways that make up the path)

bicycle=designated is now re-added here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159392398

(Unrelated: I wonder if the city or the Couture developer missed an opportunity to put a small bike path on the west side of the one block of Lincoln Memorial between Michigan and Clybourn. This would fully connect the path under 794 with the Oak Leaf Trail. Though, last I checked in-person, the area is still under construction, so maybe it'll happen!)
BPTT (2024-11-22 19:32:03+00:00): I was hoping for the same thing. Based on recent construction, it looks like we may be in luck after all - unfortunately for me, it was the part of the Couture that I was most excited for and it looks like they've left it for last. I hope they provide a viable connection and get the light timing appreciably right.
bike'n'hike (2024-10-29 06:56:25+00:00): Stimmt immer noch nicht, fahrradfahrer / reiter die diesen Grund aus forstlichen (?) Gründen benützen sind frei:

https://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/?signs=250,1026-37
Road–Runner (2024-11-03 23:39:04+00:00): Ja eh, strenggenommen stimmt das. Aber viele Router wie komoot missachten das und beachten nur bicycle=no. Wir haben das schon recht ausgiebig diskutiert und bicycle=no war dann der Minimalkonsens, um auch die Grundbesitzer zufriedenzustellen. Ist natürlich nicht optimal aber was solls...
mike140 (2024-10-29 07:34:08+00:00): Який саме ставок ви позначили як пересихаючій?
RedSkies (2024-10-30 19:27:34+00:00): reverting of unnecessary deletion

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158556470
0235 (2024-10-30 21:29:44+00:00): Absolute Hero, Thank-you! That giant Multi-Polygon has been a Thorn in my side for a long time, I appreciate the work it must have taken to split it up, and all the other work! I never knew about the Bicycle Advanced Stop Lines, I will try to keep an Eye out for those to map, If there are any left :D

It already looks so much better, and not a sea of Grey and Red.

Many thanks,
Richard.
LordGarySugar (2024-10-31 03:23:38+00:00): I'm glad I could help! I only intended to fix a couple of wonky roads, but I got distracted! I basically ended up downloading the whole of the town to sort all the landuse out. If it helps, I actually deleted the multipolygon and retagged the outer way as residential, which made it a lot more manageable to split into smaller chunks. (But yes, still a good few hours). A lot of the landuse is still very big and overlapping with smaller areas so I might come back to it at some point.

Funnily enough, I did notice that you had edited a lot of things in Kettering and did wonder if you had noticed the landuse situation and whether you would care if it got split up & detailed!

While I'm here, I did remove a couple of give way signs in front of roundabouts; they are not necessary there. That's the only little nitpick I could find :) I didn't look that closely the other day, but I have to say I am a big fan of how neat and detailed all your buildings are!

If you need any help with anything else, just let me know!
Robert
DiogoBaptista98 (2025-02-27 05:25:13+00:00): Boas edições, nomeadamente no que toca a transportes, tenho visto o grande trabalho que tens feito na wiki, uma pena não estares num dos grupos da comunidade portuguesa no discord ou telegram para termos uma via de contacto direto para falarmos sobre todos esses pojectos. cumprimentos https://discord.com/invite/zy5wuBK6EM
rungdung (2024-10-29 02:41:26+00:00): Hello Krithikrb, can you please add descriptive comments? Many changesets of yours contain "i edit useful as i am honest" and that is not descriptive of the changes you've made. Please take a look at this guide: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Krithikrb (2025-10-25 06:44:44+00:00): Ok
kartler175 (2024-12-10 15:11:57+00:00): Please do not add new highways (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1323243005) where one already exists. Adjust the tags on existing ways instead. Do not add fake landuses to indicate track properties. Add suitable properties (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:mtb:scale) to the corresponding road section instead.
大山かなめ (2025-01-21 05:12:24+00:00): あなたがウェイ1328924998として描いた建物（まるひろ坂戸店）は、かつてウェイ471352211と描かれていた地物で、2023年に解体されたことを現地確認し削除したものです。
航空写真を利用してマッピングする際は、既存のデータより古い情報で上書きしないように十分に確認を行うことを推奨します。
Joske1020 (2026-04-14 16:37:08+00:00): moeten deze tags niet op het gebouw zelf staan? kan je uitleggen waarom je dit niet doet?
bxl-forever (2026-04-14 19:47:59+00:00): De watermolen moet aangesloten worden op de rivier, het was niet het geval, en dit is ondertussen opgelost, bedankt voor de opmerking.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2024-10-29 11:38:51+00:00): Hi! Thanks for your contributions. However, your edits are non standard. Please do not add service roads as parking spaces. Also, since the cycleway is not separated from the road here, you should not create a separated way for the cycleway. The tags were already set on the road itself. I will revert this changeset. Please take the time to read the wiki before doing more edits. Thanks and have a good day!
literan (2024-10-29 18:03:56+00:00): нет там никаких гидрантов, не выдумывайте
NeisBot (2024-10-29 05:11:50+00:00): Hello EbnSamir1, and welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and changesets, particularly those concerning the names you've added or modified.

It seems that some of these names are a bit unusual.

#NameCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-10-29 05:21:54+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158482136
BR_pebble (2025-02-14 08:35:54+00:00): Hello Beccasuccar
 Thank you for mapping!
 I have created missing buildings: way 1331247868,
 way 1331247885,
 way 1331247877,
 way 1331247887,
 way 1331247869,
 way 1331247867,
 way 1331247876,
 way 1331247872,
 way 1331247873,
 way 1331247874,
 way 1331247875,
 way 1331247870,
 way 1331247871,
 way 1331247884,
 way 1328947133,
 way 1331247883,
 way 1331247878,
 way 1331247879,
 way 1331247880,
 way 1331247881.
 Please inspect your task carefully before closing.
 Happy Mapping!
NeisBot (2024-10-29 05:11:53+00:00): Hello EbnSamir1, and welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and changesets, particularly those concerning the names you've added or modified.

It seems that some of these names are a bit unusual.

#NameCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-10-29 05:21:57+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158482136
MxxCon (2024-10-30 23:34:46+00:00): It's not =disused:cannabis, it's disused:shop=
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158479696
juliencherry (2024-10-31 00:19:57+00:00): My bad, thanks for fixing the typo!
totera (2024-10-30 22:53:53+00:00): Ciao evilworld, quando aggiungi i numeri di telefono dovresti usare questo formato: +39 spazio prefisso spazio numero (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone#Usage)
evilworld (2024-10-30 23:35:08+00:00): va bene grazie. spesso faccio il copia e incolla e mi dimentico
rskedgell (2025-08-27 12:36:38+00:00): Are you *sure* that this open air sports court is a building?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1328976827
PicaPico (2025-08-28 06:48:37+00:00): Well done. Thank you for correction.
rskedgell (2025-08-28 11:06:38+00:00): Adding machine learning crap without bothering to check it is bad enough without being your being patronising.
PicaPico (2025-08-28 11:42:10+00:00): It’s lovely to hear from you. You're so right. Please feel free to remove and change anything you find unsuitable. It was simply used to fill any areas that were largely empty.
yasslay (2024-11-04 11:32:28+00:00): Thanks! Sorry for not fixing them earlier.
yasslay (2024-11-04 11:33:38+00:00): Will need to edit relation due to the southbound off-slip being closed per a recent survey. I'm not familiar with the bus route, is there a diversion through Iwade?
Violaine_Do (2024-11-26 19:56:33+00:00): Iaorana, merci pour tes contributions. Pour l'ajout de chalet, pas besoin de mettre TAHITI et MOOREA devant le nom, cela parasite la base, et n'est pas recommandé (bonnes pratiques de la communauté). On n'indique que le nom officiel dans le tag name. Pourrais tu le prendre en compte pour les prochains? N'hésite pas si tu as des questions. Bon mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158481106
Zaneo (2024-10-29 14:01:56+00:00): Are the names really displayed like that or is the branch?

e.g. name:ja=セブンイレブン　西千葉駅南口店
vs.
branch:ja=セブンイレブン　西千葉駅南口店
okadatsuneo (2024-10-29 14:17:20+00:00): A name tag is used for the business or station name.
It is the station name.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dbicycle_rental
Zaneo (2024-10-29 14:52:13+00:00): Sounds good, thanks for sharing!
dpolovinkin (2024-12-27 05:01:36+00:00): hi! Please don't remote tourist attraction POI which were there for a long time! Talking about this (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1530714712), there is a dedicated water/swimming area already. Will restore. 

And also after you changed this https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1149341363 it stopped being shown as a water area on the map, will also fix that.
Jonáš Hubáček (2024-12-29 14:32:45+00:00): Hello, sorry for that. I dont remember exactly I have done that. Propably i was correcting design appearence according to mapy.cz https://mapy.cz/s/jurokevacu - my idea was to be shown in the map as a dot point "Blue Lagoon 1" Next time im not going to remove anything. Thank you
dpolovinkin (2024-12-31 10:02:17+00:00): no problem :) just gotta be careful :)
Andrea Musuruane (2024-10-29 14:40:31+00:00): Hi. Can you please avoid moving and or editing imported buildings? Their outline and their location is much better than the one you can see from aerial images. Thanks, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158481598
Swihail (2024-10-31 10:28:36+00:00): Hi Andrea Musuruane, Thank you for reverting the changeset. I will be more cautious working around imported buildings in Italy.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-08 03:53:12+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164659189
Stalker61 (2024-11-01 12:55:15+00:00): Добрый вечер
Пролетарский проспект 6/1
Какой оригинальный адресочек. Не подскажете откуда дровишки?
sergeyfilyushkin (2024-11-01 14:19:26+00:00): Потому что скопировал этот каток с ул пролетарской, не задумываясь о том, что при копировании объекта адрес тоже копируется
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-06 03:03:39+00:00): Cleaned up SEO spam tags for Two Men and a Truck POI in changeset 183720745

https://osm.org/changeset/183720745
yrtimiD (2024-11-01 22:13:58+00:00): Hi, why would you remove all the names of the bridge?
yrtimiD (2024-11-01 22:31:37+00:00): FYI, I fixed all the tags, please edit carefully.
Amit Yaron (2024-11-02 08:44:28+00:00): Elevated it.MNade it stop being a "river".
mavl (2025-03-07 15:05:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-10-29 19:44:48+00:00): reverted.
Please don't use untested editors

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158514310
tastrax (2024-10-30 10:46:04+00:00): Not sure this is now a reservoir. New covered reservoirs to the south - check the ESRI imagery. I think its all being turned into parkland. I will be there in the next couple of weeks and will try to get some mapillary imagery.
Bexhill-OSM (2024-10-29 17:21:45+00:00): Thanks for updating the map, that is very useful :)
citrula (2024-10-29 09:33:09+00:00): There's still some leftover stuff from changeset 158317495 which looks dubious.
BCNorwich (2024-10-29 11:40:16+00:00): Hello citrula,

I think whats left is OK. I can't tell if the house name is correct nor do I have info on the solar installation.

Regards Bernard.
Baloo Uriza (2024-10-29 13:33:56+00:00): Please review the wiki for preferred methods to tag addresses and phone numbers.  What you're doing now is just creating more work for other people.  Please operate in good faith or don't participate.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158483625
woodpeck_repair (2024-10-29 13:50:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 158499392 where the changeset comment is: revert adversiting
HellMap (2024-10-29 18:21:55+00:00): Sveiki,

Šajā posmā https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1327586787 ātrums bija 50 garām stigas ceļam un 70 bija tikai no vietas, kur ir 2 joslas. Vismaz pavisam nesen (23. oktobris) pēc remonta tā bija. Gribēju precizēt, vai šī izmaiņa sanāca nekorekta vai arī tur kaut kas tikko vēlreiz mainījies?

Paldies
Rolands Reksnis (2024-10-29 18:38:20+00:00): Salīdzinot šodienas video ierakstu un karšu pārlūku, šķiet precizitāte līdz +/- 5m.

https://kartes.lgia.gov.lv/karte/?x=313669.50&y=512304.97&zoom=11&basemap=topokarte
HellMap (2024-10-29 18:56:20+00:00): Jā, zīme ir tieši tur, kur joslas pāriet no 3 uz 2. Lai skaidrāk, iezīmēju kā https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12282338398. Bet tad drošvien redaktorā ir sajaukts posms, jo šis posms https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1327586787 ir uz rietumiem no zīmes.
osmviborg (2024-10-29 07:36:24+00:00): 'forventningen er, at man kan begynde at bygge fra næste år'. Tagges med 'greenfield' & 'proposed'.
AndreasOdense (2024-10-29 07:40:33+00:00): Jeg har adgang til artiklen bag paywallen og der står: De er netop nu ved at anlægge veje, kloak, vand, el og fibernet i området, og forventningen er, at de første (huse) kan begynde at bygge i foråret.
osmviborg (2024-10-29 07:46:27+00:00): Den information kunne du have givet i en note, så havde andre kan følge med. Ikke smart at referere til en artikel bag en paywall.
AndreasOdense (2024-10-29 07:48:47+00:00): Jeg opdagede først efter at du kommenterede at den var bag paywall.
UNGSC-DTLM-Ale_Zena (2024-10-31 20:38:04+00:00): Hello,
may I suggest to make a little smaller changeset, as this one spans 2 Continents?
Thank you, cheers
Alessandro
SKald (2024-11-01 09:50:15+00:00): You're right of course. 
Wasn't really on purpose.
Alexia Schoonjans (2024-10-29 20:04:15+00:00): Bonjour, je voudrais signaler une erreur, on dirait que vous avez ajouté 3 fois l’Athénée royal Tamine, or il n'y a qu'une seule école ici. Aussi, "Athénée royale Tamine" avec "royale" au féminin est peut-être une erreur. Est-ce que ça s'écrit vraiment comme ça ? Merci de la bonne attention. Alexia, contributrice wallonne.
tatsiana-krauchanka (2024-10-29 08:37:04+00:00): #mapbox_editing
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158485016
kapazao (2024-10-29 22:19:50+00:00): Hi, could you explain where did you get information about Santa Clara Golf Granada to change some information of the holes?
I made those elements from the official website when it was operational.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158485149
Tomas Straupis (2024-10-30 11:21:23+00:00): Kibučių kaimo kapinės niekaip negali būti turėti nei Žiežmarių, nei Žaslių g. adreso. Arba blogas adresas, arba čia ne tos kapinės. Nuėmiau adreso žymas.
funkyboris (2024-11-05 17:18:38+00:00): Er der en grund til at landuse=industrial ikke må være der ?
osmviborg (2024-11-05 17:40:47+00:00): Der er ikke industrivirksomhed i området længere. Det er en forurenet grund som Randers Kommune nu har ansvaret for. Lige nu er de ved at etablere et anlæg som kan opfange regnvandet fra grunden og fjerne den forurening der udvaskes. I 25 ha. af området er der sået græs, så det nu ligner en kuperet græsmark.
tguen (2025-01-19 22:33:02+00:00): As I told you in your previous changeset here, OSM has a policy to map names according to the physical signage on location. This hotel is signed only as "Hotel Vance" and should be named as such. This building is *not* 8 stories. The hotel within it may occupy 8 stories, but that is not what the tags you are using mean.

I am reverting these changes *again*. I've previously reverted your changes made in changesets 156532883 and 143016929 as well as similar changes made by others in 112265467 and 93061416 which I suspect are accounts associated with your company (PropertyView). Please read and ensure you are in compliance with the Organised Editing Guidelines, and read the wiki pages for the tags you are using to ensure you are using them correctly.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

I will be reviewing your changes. If you continue to make inappropriate changes here or elsewhere, I will have to report you for violating organized editing policies and vandalism.
Tommybara (2024-11-09 07:50:39+00:00): Đường chỉ mới quy hoạch, chưa khởi công làm đường thì không vẽ vào đây. Mong bạn lưu ý giúp. Xin cảm ơn!
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-08 03:53:13+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164659189
eggie (2024-10-29 08:52:00+00:00): Dag Carlo.....  Je verwijdert nu de aanduiding voor de breedte van de weg. Wat klopt er niet en wat is de breedte dan wel?
De voorgaande mapper is zeer ervaren. 

MVG
eggie
Carlo Nannings (2024-10-29 10:00:37+00:00): We lopen er tegenaan dat de standaardbreedte van een tankautospuit in LiveNav 3 meter bedraagt. Dit was het enige stukje weg nog waar de breedte ingesteld stond op 2,5 meter.
eggie (2024-10-29 10:05:09+00:00): Oke.. maar  kun je dan de aangegeven breedte van de weg niet overrulen met emergency=yes?
Dat zie ik wel meer doen door VR mappers.
Nu verdwijnt door anderen ingegeven info van de kaart.
Groet..
eggie
eggie (2024-10-29 09:00:17+00:00): Dag  bakkerdy   Beetje vreemde situatie hier. Volgens mij staat er nog steeds een G11 bord vooraan en dat maakt het gewoon een fietspad.
Wellicht motor_vehicle=destination hier?
Je hebt ook alle tagging van het fietspad op de weg laten staan en alleen cycleway aangepast naar unclassified.
Is het bord  G11 (verplicht fietspad) hier verwijderd?

MVG
eggie
bakkerdy (2024-10-29 09:11:37+00:00): Klopt het is een vreemde situatie maar ik kom hier al 15 jaar 3x in de week. Het is ook erg vervelend dat de navigaties en dergelijke het niet goed aangeven. Er is hier ontheffing voor de auto's om over het fietspad te rijden. Anders is achteromsedijk 8 ook niet bereikbaar. Het bord G11 staat er nog gewoon maar aan de andere kant van het pad staat onder het bord doodlopend staat uitgezonderd fietsers.
eggie (2024-10-29 09:23:03+00:00): Tijd voor een terugmelding bij de gemeente. Zolang er een G11 bord staat blijft het natuurlijk een fietspad.
Tja wat is wijsheid.
Wanneer je het een fietspad houdt dan zou je motor_vehicle=destination kunnen taggen. Dat routeert overigens niet.
motor_vehicle=yes
Het is even een afweging van belang. De meeste gebouwen zijn via de reguliere weg te bereiken.
Nu is het vlees nog vis. 
Zelf denk ik toch meer aan cycleway. 
Zeker als er een G11 bord staat. 
Dan dat stuk voor zien van motor_vehicle=destination 
Zo zou ik het doen. 
Dan is het juist gemapt.
Mapse
eggie
bakkerdy (2024-10-29 09:31:42+00:00): Oke bedankt, contact met de gemeente is wellicht wel handig. Ik denk dat de huidige bewerking dan kan worden verwijderd
eggie (2024-10-29 09:39:09+00:00): Oke Tot nr 8 is het weer een G11 fietspad met motor_vehicle=yes 
Dan zal het in ieder geval tot nr 8 routeren voor motorvoertuigen.
Groet,
eggie
mcliquid (2024-10-29 10:24:56+00:00): Die Stelzen (aerialway=pylon) stehen nun ganz ohne Lift-Linie umher. Die können auch weg oder?
Und was ist mit den ganzen Pisten? Gibt es die trotzdem noch oder können die dann auch weg? Die meisten davon sind als Skitouren-Piste angelegt, das sollte ja auch weiterhin noch möglich sein.
mcliquid (2024-11-07 13:46:55+00:00): Korrektur: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158856759
Bregenzerwald Tourismus (2024-11-07 14:08:40+00:00): Ja, die Stelzen können auch weg. Auf der Niedere oben sind noch 2 Schlepplifte und ein Übungslift in Betrieb, diese Pisten können also bleiben. Das Skigebiet wird über die Seilbahn Bezau erreicht.
mueschel (2024-11-30 10:04:53+00:00): Hi,
there are several hundred objects with tags like 
ADD_COMMENTS = 0
or duplicating the name tag. I guess these were imported by mistake and can be removed?
Angry_Tau (2024-12-03 21:47:57+00:00): Hi!
Yes, they can be safely removed. These are comments on the WC GIS address node dataset originally created by the county mappers; when not empty, they often contain the name of the business/park/facility. 

My procedure has been to remove them just before upload, as once in a while they can help me place ambiguous/poorly placed nodes, and I must have forgotten for some subset! 

Thanks, A.T.
jxpsert (2024-10-30 09:45:22+00:00): Hoi, ik zie dat je best wel wat image= tags weghaalt hiermee. Kunnen panoramax en image= niet naast elkaar bestaan?

Uiteraard taggen we voor de feiten, niet voor applicaties, maar de image= tag wordt best breed gebruikt. Zo ook bijvoorbeeld mijn site, openaed.nl, heeft nu bij een aantal AEDs geen foto meer omdat deze tag verwijderd is.
Pieter Vander Vennet (2024-10-30 14:35:16+00:00): Hallo,

Voor een volledig overzicht en context, zie https://github.com/pietervdvn/MapComplete/issues/2189 en https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/panoramax

Sowieso verwacht ik dat imgur ons vroeg of laat drooglegt en/of die afbeeldingen verwijdert.

Je kan eenvoudig panoramax-afbeeldingen tonen, bv met https://api.panoramax.xyz/api/pictures/{hash}/sd.jpg
literan (2024-10-29 17:55:25+00:00): это не driveway https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/166688739

это тег для дороги самого низкого уровня, например дорожки к одному дому или даче