piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
QuiLe (2026-01-29 06:24:36+00:00): Hi lucidoffices, Thanks for contributing. Could you please write more descriptive changeset comments? Unfortunately "-" doesn't convey enough information for other users to know what you've edited. You can find examples of good changeset comments here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 

A good example for your changeset comment could be “Added a co-working office space in Frisco” or “removed old tags for office building” 

Thank you, QuiLe
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177831493
arjunaraoc (2026-03-20 04:56:09+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Mapping should not consider shadows seen in satellite images.  You should map only top view. Please review and fix.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177831730
ffmp (2026-01-29 06:17:59+00:00): Was wrong date in message.
Jan 2025 -> Jan 2026.
Grass-snake (2026-01-30 18:04:32+00:00): Здравствуйте, подскажите, в чём смысл удалять существующие улицы (даже правильно названные) и на их месте рисовать точно такие же? Это мешает проверки данных (в том числе и других пакетов правок, не только этого).

Подскажите, для Вас принципиально именно такие названия улиц ("улица Златоустовская", а не "Златоустовская улица")?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history
Kovoschiz (2026-01-30 17:13:48+00:00): Please don't merge `building=` area with site grounds area. They are different
Grass-snake (2026-01-30 18:08:12+00:00): Здравствуйте, в OSM принято указывать полные названия без сокращений (например, вместо "Восточная ул." нужно указывать "Восточная улица"). И ещё раз, не нужно удалять существующие правильно нарисованные дороги, это очень мешает проверке, так как в таких изменениях значительно сложнее искать ошибки!

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BE%D0%B1_%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3
salisburymistake (2026-01-29 15:50:52+00:00): Reverting because user is using outdated imagery. That entire rail corridor is currently under construction. Stop trying to reconnect the streets - they have no intention of reconnecting them.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177854585
rsitoni_Lyft (2026-02-03 05:53:51+00:00): Hi salisburymistake,
My name is Ravinder and I'm a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. Thank you so much for correcting the mistake & reverting the edits. Regarding my edits: I updated the way (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1463713727) based on Lyft-owned telemetry data and aerial imagery. Unfortunately, the imagery I referenced was outdated (March 2025), and I did not review the note in the OSM history beforehand.
I sincerely apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused. I will be more diligent with future changesets. 
Thank you for your contribution.
 
Regards,
Ravinder
mueschel (2026-02-07 10:25:47+00:00): Please check this node, it got a strange "ABS" tag:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13508411050
NeisBot (2026-01-30 07:03:58+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13508453511 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Pool care service"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-02-07 07:48:48+00:00): ❌ Text fixed by https://osm.org/changeset/178182660
Grass-snake (2026-01-30 17:59:02+00:00): Здравствуйте, если меняете название улицы, не забывайте менять addr:street на всех домах, которые связаны с этой улицей.
beidha2025 (2026-01-29 09:27:17+00:00): البيضاء.beidha
MertComlek (2026-01-29 07:59:59+00:00): NOT: D300 Devlet yolu Konya Merkez sınırları içinde D300-12 ve D300-13 kesimleri olarak ayrılmaktadır. D300-12 kesimi Mobilyacılar Kavşağı'nda bitmekte olup D300-13 kesimi ise D300-D715 Aksaray Kavşağı'nda başlamaktadır. Kesimleri birleştirmek için lütfen devlet yolları üzerinde isim ve ilişki bindirmesi yapmayınız. D300-12 ve D300-13 kesimi birbirine bağlı değillerdir. Buna göre yollarda düzenleme yapabilirsiniz.
felipeeugenio (2026-01-30 12:07:25+00:00): Hola Ian. Por favor unirse al chat de la comunidad. Cada edición tuya es un error.
Esto es normal en quienes empiezan y nuestra idea es ayudar, pero necesitamos que te agras a que te ayuden. Pusiste una avenida entera como cul_de_sac y luego borraste todos los tags de un parque.
Las alturas que agregas también son exactas? son oficiales? o son estimaciones? no hacemos estimaciones en OSM.

Todo esto es fácil de corregir y estams para ayudarte, pero la idea es que vayas aprendiendo.

saludos y nos vemos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177835058
NeisBot (2026-01-30 07:04:07+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13508539801 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Mini Mart Smokeshop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-07 07:48:50+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178216954
(Cleaned up leftovers from previous edits)
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-22 13:08:59+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with advertising/malformed tags and source=* of Google Maps, which is not allowed by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ), in changeset 184431458

https://osm.org/changeset/184431458
czebureks (2026-06-01 00:36:45+00:00): Cześć, dzięki za aktualizację. Ale chyba jest pomyłka - mięsny nazywa się "Żabka"?
rademalis (2026-06-01 06:09:44+00:00): Cześć. Dzięki poprawiłem tą "Żabkę”
eggie (2026-01-29 10:24:37+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback...  Alle tagging is in UK English
(diapers?)
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Hyperdog (2026-01-29 11:35:59+00:00): Hallo Eggie,
Bedankt! Ik heb je reactie gezien en zal de tag nog aanpassen.
mor (2026-01-29 12:01:53+00:00): Hola. He visto que has borrado varios caminos alegando que son de uso privado. Esto no es motivo para borrar un camino, para eso existen etiquetas que indican las restricciones de acceso existentes. El objetivo de Openstreetmap es representar todo lo que hay, no sólo los elementos públicos. Puedes ver en el mapa miles de caminos privados, como por ejemplo los accesos a casas dentro de una finca.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-27 11:12:03+00:00): Cleaned up SEO spam and other mistagging for Lucid Private Offices POI in changeset 184688495

https://osm.org/changeset/184688495
DD1GJ (2026-01-29 13:18:02+00:00): Weshalb stimmt diese Adresse nicht mit der im Impressum vom citycare24.de angegebenen Anschrift in Lilienthal überein?
citycare24 (2026-01-29 13:35:17+00:00): Dies ist die postalische und juristische Adresse sowie der Ort unserer Lagerflächen. Das Büro für Einkauf und Marketing befindet sich tatsächlich in der Mary-Somerville-Straße 3.
DD1GJ (2026-01-29 14:59:01+00:00): Irgendwann gibt ein LKW-Fahrer in sein OSM-basiertes Navi Citycare24 ein und steht dann mit 30 Tonnen Ladung vor dem Marketingbüro ...
citycare24 (2026-01-30 07:55:28+00:00): Vielen Dank für den Hinweis – und auch dafür, dass Sie an die Situation von LKW-Fahrern denken. Das ist ein berechtigter Punkt.

In unserem Fall ist es jedoch so, dass Citycare24 keine Warenanlieferungen und Logistik selbst abwickelt. Die Lieferung und Logistik werden für uns von einem externen Dienstleister bzw. Partner über unsere Lagerstandorte organisiert. Deshalb wird unsere Büroadresse in der Mary-Somerville-Straße 3 nicht als Zieladresse für LKW-Anlieferungen genutzt und auch nicht per Navi für Anlieferungen angesteuert.

Die Angabe der Büroanschrift dient vor allem der Transparenz: Partnern und Kundinnen/Kunden soll klar sein, wo sich unser Einkauf und Marketing tatsächlich befinden und wie wir erreichbar sind.

Ich habe Sie mit meiner vorherigen Antwort vermutlich etwas verwirrt, weil unser Logistikpartner ebenfalls in Lilienthal sitzt – und ich fälschlicherweise davon ausgegangen bin, dass Sie ihn meinten. Die im Impressum angegebene Adresse Bergstraße 100, 28865 Lilienthal ist lediglich eine Registrierungs- bzw. Postanschrift, an die unsere offizielle Korrespondenz zugestellt wird.

Nochmals vielen Dank für Ihren konstruktiven Hinweis!
Taya_S (2026-01-30 15:00:09+00:00): If you are developing your own editor, please use the dev server. OSM.org is not intended for experimentation such as this.

https://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/
Warin61 (2026-01-29 23:21:29+00:00): Since you stated you have added over 700 nodes to a boundary of the Brisbane Waters National park that was some 204 nodes. This is data bloat.
Warin61 (2026-01-29 23:49:34+00:00): Some have trees in their backyards - still a residential area. 

I am reverting back to the 204 node segment for the National Park boundary. With a comment on the way.
user_23564325 (2026-02-03 09:55:49+00:00): Thats fair.
NeisBot (2026-01-30 07:04:14+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13508649965 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Medical spa clinic"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-07 07:48:52+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178216955
(Cleaned up leftovers from previous edits)
ItaliA1delSole (2026-01-29 09:42:22+00:00): Su wikipedia: "In seguito al decreto legislativo n. 112 del 1998, dal 2001, la gestione del tratto Genola - Fossano è passata dall'ANAS alla Provincia di Cuneo, che ha ridenominato la strada come provinciale con il nuovo nome di strada provinciale 428 di Genola. Dal 2021, in occasione del piano di rientro strade, la tratta suddetta è passata nuovamente in gestione all'ANAS."
sanchi (2026-01-29 13:27:54+00:00): Hola.
Por favor deja de borrar vías que si existen. Si son de acceso privado se ponen como privadas pero no se borran.
Se recuperan todos los cambios incorrectos.
Un saludo
marczoutendijk (2026-01-30 15:01:58+00:00): All your changesets have the text: "This is where I live". What do you mean with that? It seems you are revealing private information, which is not allowed on OSM!

Best regards  
Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
kingkingHK (2026-02-01 07:10:31+00:00): 1. It's obviously Central Ferry, not Macau Ferry.
2. Please ensure your public transport routes are not broken.
3. Why monolingual `operator` for the route, but bilingual for the route_master?
4. While the PTv2 descriptive name is controversial, why would you use different names for the route and route_master?
9_tab (2026-01-30 04:36:34+00:00): This restores an edit that had already been self-reverted
anshanin (2026-01-29 19:35:13+00:00): Hi.
This note was created on construction site which is definitely not a correct location.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13508773633
anshanin (2026-01-29 19:35:24+00:00): This node*
Evgeniya_rocketdata (2026-01-30 09:54:59+00:00): Hello! 
Before publishing, we checked the availability of the locations on the website https://admiralbet.rs/help/category/betting-shops-113/card/betting-shops-176 and it says the location is operational. However, if it's not listed and is still under construction, we'll remove it without any problem.
We also submit projects for community verification before publishing https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/importing-data-from-company-owners-using-the-rocketdata-io-service/91712/46. Please join us!

Thank you for your feedback!
anshanin (2026-01-30 10:53:21+00:00): I see this address in the list:
BAS, Antifašističke borbe 48 (09-03)
0605504432
But this building is 100% under construction.
Evgeniya_rocketdata (2026-01-30 12:25:04+00:00): Okay, thanks for the information! We'll delete it.
bxl-forever (2026-01-29 10:49:10+00:00): Hello,

You changed the name into "alimentation" but kept it as a bakery.

Do you still remember the shop type it is now?  Hasn’t it changed into a convenience store/night shop?

Thanks in advance.
robertgzr (2026-01-29 21:50:16+00:00): i even went inside. it definitely seemed to be a bakery. but the new store logo and name match this: https://alimentationbxl.be/en

they seem to be behind the 'cafe des spores' next door as well, though i cant find any reference to a bakery on their website/social media (from cursory search)
bxl-forever (2026-01-30 10:16:46+00:00): Very good, thanks for having checked.
We will keep it as a bakery, and I will add the website too.
klik (2026-02-09 08:35:00+00:00): Hallo koastoas, kannst Du mir erklären, warum Du hier den fixme Eintrag gelöscht hast ohne auch nur einer der als noch fehlend angemerkten Informationen beizutragen?

Des Weiteren halte ich es für nicht angemessen den Tag name=bft zu setzen. bft ist wie schon getagged die Marke und nicht der Name. Meines Wissens hat diese Tankstelle keinen Name.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177840239
koastoas (2026-02-09 10:45:37+00:00): fixme mit Öffnungszeiten, Spritsorten ist nicht notwendig.
Habe die Tankstelle anhand der Webseite angepasst
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178305321
klik (2026-02-09 11:34:58+00:00): Danke
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177840239
trial (2026-01-31 18:58:12+00:00): Bonjour, merci pour votre suivi des librairies. Concerant celle-ci, vous avez laissé addr: alors que le point d'adressage était présent.
Il est conseillé en France de NE PAS mettre de addr: sur les POI mais d'avoir des adresses en limite de voirie public/privé.
Et si vous voulez mettre une adresse sur un POI d'utiliser contact: comme préfixe.
xcazin (2026-02-01 16:12:03+00:00): savoir que la rue sur laquelle se situe le POI est une relation associatedStreet pour remplacer addr: par contact: ou faut-il aussi vérifier qu'il existe un point adresse sur le bâtiment ?
xcazin (2026-02-01 16:14:28+00:00): [désolé, mauvais collé] Merci ! Je n'avais pas pensé à changer addr: en contact: parce qu'il s'agissait de passer la boutique en disused: je vais corriger mais je permets une question : suffit-il de savoir que la rue sur laquelle se situe le POI est une relation associatedStreet pour remplacer addr: par contact: ou faut-il aussi vérifier qu'il existe un point adresse sur le bâtiment ?
trial (2026-02-01 19:00:23+00:00): En fait la logique est différente : une relation associatedStreet ne comporte que des segments de rue et des numéros d'adresse.
Les POI doivent être cartographiés séparément (je ne dis pas que c'est systématiquement fait, Hoatta Ta Tatoo par exemple au sud de la rue au lieu d'être proprement cartographié squatte le numéro 65, masquant ainsi le point d'adresse).
Et donc si on prend le cas du 65, il faudrait idéalement faire deux objets et comme ici quand il n'y en a qu'un, avoir addr: est normal, donc oui vérifier que le point d'adresse existe bien est nécessaire.
trial (2026-02-01 19:01:06+00:00): J'oubliais : website n'a plus de sens du coup.
xcazin (2026-02-02 08:23:10+00:00): OK merci, c'est clair ! Je viens de changer par was:website. Vaut-il mieux carrément supprimer dans ce cas ?
trial (2026-02-02 09:28:37+00:00): Dans ce cas précis, supprimer puisque l'ancine site n'est plus accessible. S'il l'était necore et donnait la raison de la fermeture de la librairie,on pourrait laisser (mais en général, comme ici, les certificats expirent et le contenu actuel est "Site en maintenance, nous mettons tout en oeuvre pour le retablir au plus vite." qui n'a pas grand intérêt et qui risque de perdurer).
xcazin (2026-02-02 10:08:17+00:00): 👍 Merci trial, pigé la logique.
Yog Sot (2026-01-29 22:11:08+00:00): ej sory, ale czemu kasujesz połączenia ściezkami?
qstep (2026-01-29 10:54:39+00:00): Konnektor nem lehet bejárat! entrance=yes címkét épületeken használunk ajtókra, kapukra.

fixme-ben szerepel, hogy rakjuk rá épületre a konnektort. Ha a helyszínen mérted fel, kérlek rakd rá épületre és töröld a fixme címkét. Ha a mellette lévő WC falán van a konnektor, csak töröld a fixme címkét.
Attila0474 (2026-01-31 08:38:11+00:00): Updatelve.
WaffleR_zero (2026-01-29 10:53:08+00:00): Hello, I see many warnings in your changeset. Please fix this.
WaffleR_zero (2026-01-29 11:09:03+00:00): Please use a suitable changeset comment https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
bxl-forever (2026-01-29 11:10:54+00:00): Bonjour,

Merci pour ceci et bienvenue sur OSM.

Cest déjà la troisième ou quatrième fois que des gens déplacent le Carrefour des Six Coins sur la carte.  On a déjà eu des guerres d'éditions entre ceux qui disent que c'est celui-ci ou l'autre carrefour.

On a une source de la Région ici https://monument.heritage.brussels/fr/streets/10601150 qui cite le coin Victoire/Métal étant le carrefour des Six Coins.

Je veux bien vous croire, mais est-ce que vous connaissez une source documentaire fiable qui confirme que c’est ici ?  Ainsi, nous pourrons référer à cette source et clore ce débat une fois pour toutes.

(Attention, vous avez simplement ajouté "name" et "description" mais la carte ne le montrera pas.  Aussi, faut-il vraiment que ce nom soit uniquement écrit en français et pas dans les deux langues ?)
mcliquid (2026-02-01 12:14:13+00:00): Hallo,

ich möchte dazu einladen den folgenden Abschnitt im Wiki zu lesen und zu berücksichtigen:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Nakaner/Positionspapier_Geheimhaltung#Warum_werden_diese_Objekte_erfasst?_Warum_werden_sie_nicht_gel%C3%B6scht?
Warin61 (2026-02-18 08:25:04+00:00): Part revert.
trial (2026-01-31 19:55:45+00:00): Bonjour,
name c'est plutôt Pigier, Pigier Lorient allant dans branch.
trial (2026-01-31 19:57:46+00:00): De plus addr: existe déjà pour le 158, merci d'utiliser contact: comme préfixe des points d'intérêt.
Cayenne17 (2026-01-30 14:58:18+00:00): Bonjour,
concernant le tag ref:FR:SIREN, il est à mettre uniquement sur l'établissement qui est le siège social dans la base sirene et pas sur chaque établissement d'un entreprise  : 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:ref:FR:SIREN
Szymson (2026-05-19 02:12:10+00:00): Ośrodek Hodowli ZARODOWEJ? Chyba ZAGRODOWEJ?
NeisBot (2026-01-30 07:04:27+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13509138032 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Law office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-02-07 07:48:53+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/178182684
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-07 22:59:11+00:00): Consolidated duplicate POIs (one in the wrong location), removed SEO spam and cleaned up other tags in changeset 183802427

https://osm.org/changeset/183802427
AgenceWAM (2026-02-02 20:02:36+00:00): The description provided is the same as other companies in the same sector of activity as the WAM Agency (Example: Eskimoz), why was it removed?
"Agence de marketing digital spécialisée en SEO, GEO, SEA, création de site web, contenu, data, relations presse, ..."
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-29 22:12:52+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/168912125

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
qstep (2026-03-12 20:51:11+00:00): Hi. I think you misplaced this roundabout: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1472323759#map=19/47.861365/17.274706&layers=N

It should be at the intersection of Mosonyi Mihály utca and Aranyossziget utca: https://www.kisalfold.hu/helyi-kozelet/2024/12/korforgalom-mosonmagyarovar

Also, please read the wiki article on how to create roundabouts: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Droundabout
Kookykooky (2026-03-13 08:17:52+00:00): Hi, I'm very sorry, you're right, I messed up, I fixed it. Hopefully it's fine now.
Thanks
Udarian (2026-01-29 17:21:27+00:00): What is you source for this building existing, I can confirm that it seems to be under construction on the latest imagery available from the county, but that is not listed in you sources or imagery used, so I am wondering what you used.

Happy mapping,
Udar.
Икчпук (2026-01-30 15:54:58+00:00): Greetings, Udar. I use a variety of sources, from Google to Sentinel. I've heard that not all sources are considered legitimate here, so I try to be careful. I noticed a significant difference between the images from Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta and Esri World Imagery, and at first I decided to simply mark the buildings and roads as "demolished." But then on Sentinel (I don't know how legitimate this source is), I noticed a building and a construction site. Since OSM doesn't have any high-quality images from 2025 yet (neither Bing nor Esri), I tried to draw the building as best I could, which is why the geometry isn't the most accurate.
I hope I didn't make things worse.
Have a nice day!
Икчпук))
Gonéo (2026-01-29 14:20:57+00:00): Attention, ta mise à jour a cassé le fait que la piste cyclable est séparé pour chaque sens devant le lycée du parc (avec les arbres au centre).
Vuiser (2026-02-03 19:55:26+00:00): Merci pour ta vigilance, c'est réparé :)
eggie (2026-01-29 12:30:47+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback Alleen een naam doet niets in OSM.
Ook de aard van het bedrijf bijtaggen. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=cinema
Ook svp op de adrtesnode bijtaggen. Het punt is nu een onderdeel van de straat?
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-01-29 12:35:12+00:00): De bioscoop heb ik samengevoegd met adres nr 4  Je kunt evt schuiven met die adrtesnode. Ook de Taveerne heb ik op een node gezet.
MVG
eggie
NeisBot (2026-01-30 07:04:29+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13509281429 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Recruitment agency"

#MapWithoutSpam