piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
vJack (2023-12-28 18:41:56+00:00): I jeszcze jedna uwaga. Teraz jest remont ul. Kopernika i w miejscu w którym właśnie złączyłeś drogi powstanie wyspa, która je rozdziela.
https://www.ustka.pl/pl/news/content/8499
https://www.ustka.pl/uploads/files/Aktualnosci/ZDP_Kopernika_wariant%202.pdf
https://www.ustka.pl/uploads/files/Aktualnosci/ZDP_Kopernika_wariant%201.pdf

Nie wiem, który wariant wybrali ale na obydwu będzie wyspa.
Marek-M (2023-12-28 19:12:37+00:00): Wielkość obszaru wyłączonego z ruchu nie ma znaczenia, szczególnie na tym skrzyżowaniu. Jest jedna jezdnia, to w OSM jest jedna linia i operuje się na niej ilością pasów w obu kierunkach.

Co do przebudowy, to nie będzie to wyspa tylko wysepka, którą wystarczy wyróżnić tagiem crossing:island=yes na przejściu dla pieszych. Oczywiście jak powstanie wysepka, to rozdzielenie jezdni będzie miało podstawę ale nie może być to zrobione tak jak było przed moją  edycją, gdzie Wczasowa i Kopernika łączyły się w jednym węźle, bo to w ogóle był bardzo duży błąd.

Bez rozdziału i z rozdziałem dróg przy tych wysepkach nawigacja będzie działać poprawnie ale dojdzie więcej pracy przy edycjach takich kikutów drogowych i wiem, że tego nie uniknę :(
vJack (2023-12-28 19:22:57+00:00): Rozumiem. Łączenie w jednym miejscu było trochę słabe. Jak przyjdzie nowe orto to będzie można zobaczyć jak to dokładnie wygląda z góry po remoncie.

Wiesz może, z którego roku jest orto w Ustce i na DK21? Marzy mi się trochę takie ładne jak w Słupsku, które jest chyba sprzed roku. Jest to jeden z powodów dlaczego odechciało mi się robić w Ustce
Marek-M (2023-12-28 19:42:35+00:00): Nie wiem, czy tak to się sprawdza ale wg tego co wygrzebałem w Geoportalu https://mapy.geoportal.gov.pl/imap/Imgp_2.html?locale=pl&gui=new&sessionID=7465552 to Obecna Ortofoto jest aktualna na 2020-04-23 ale W realizacji Ortofoto ma być aktualne na 2023-03-08 - termin zakończenia przyjmowania danych jest zaplanowane na 2023-12-31 ale nie wiem kiedy te zdjęcia będą dostępne w Geoportalu i w WMS - https://imgur.com/a/7PNSqRg
vJack (2023-12-28 19:51:50+00:00): Kurde, czyli skończony remont się nie załapie. Jeżeli będzie taka sama rozdzielczość lub lepsza niż w Słupsku, to będę zadowolony.

W ogóle to Słupsk chyba ma jakieś swoje własne zdjęcia (albo na zamówienie), bo trochę się różnią od okolic. Chyba, że tak wygląda nowe orto robione tylko dla danego obszaru https://i.imgur.com/kIMhcPr.png
arjunaraoc (2023-12-29 04:40:01+00:00): One suggestion:
Please split your edits in to smaller area changesets, as it will facilitate review?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145631586
arjunaraoc (2024-01-13 07:01:17+00:00): Hi,

I see that you have reverted the name of this node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10833403752#map=19/13.63010/79.42505

As per the naming guidance at  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names
Name has to be in title case and preferably not use abbreviations.   As the location is implicit on maps, it is nor required in the name.  When  maps are rendered, lengthy names take up too much space as well.   If you have any justification for revert, please share  the same.
mcliquid (2023-12-29 15:22:51+00:00): Hola, ya he comentado que sus conjuntos de cambios son demasiado grandes. Concentra tus cambios localmente.

Hello, I have already commented that your changesets are much too big. Concentrate your changes locally.
philippec (2023-12-28 20:57:38+00:00): Kan er een (mapillary) foto bij en een location ?
soerenwegenertc (2024-01-16 12:52:48+00:00): Hallo,

wie hast du gesehen, dass die Apotheke geschlossen wurde? Die Website der Apotheke sieht noch recht aktiv aus und es wurde auch keine abweichende Adresse angegeben: https://www.linden-apotheke-chemnitz.de/

Danke und schöne Grüße,
Sören
tschervanky (2024-01-16 18:51:29+00:00): Es war in der lokalen Presse und ich gabe davor gestanden. Das Ladenlokal der Apotheke war leer.

Schöne Grüße.

tschervanky
bxl-forever (2024-01-20 15:05:12+00:00): Hello,

Thanks for the initiative.
Sadly, your design won’t route properly here.

1) Pedestrians walking across the tunnel are routed across the two elevators.

2) The connector between the elevator and the platform requires going through stairs, which is very unlikely.

Do we want us to repair this?
bxl-forever (2024-01-26 21:16:37+00:00): Fixed by changeset 146725374
rskedgell (2023-12-28 23:45:26+00:00): Is Fastrack now open to all traffic, as implied by access=yes?

What does "busmiles snap to road" mean anyway?
Cebderby (2023-12-30 19:36:55+00:00): Hi galaxytransitUK,
Further to the other changeset comments, and having reviewed your changes, are you able to confirm that what you were doing is trying to drive (or simulate driving) a bus including on bus-only and/or private ways and using bus-only turns, while using a satnav/routing software set as if you were a private car using public roads only.  And that you were prepared to change OSM data to try to force this to work for you.   Can you also confirm that this is going to stop as this is not acceptable. Wilful damage to good OSM data will not be tolerated.
Hoping you will be able to confirm this, 
Cebderby (Clive)
user_10412612 (2023-12-30 21:53:39+00:00): I was not attempting to do asuch! 

https://busmiles.uk/ map data comes from OSM and I'm trying to snap to road my bus journeys (not just me but others that use the site) but can't because there are roads which are preventing from doing so
Cebderby (2023-12-30 22:09:26+00:00): Thanks for the quick reply and the confirmation of the nature of what was triggering changes.  The only thing I've found in any of the places edited was one of the right turn restrictions you disrupted (by deleting either a 'from' or 'to' way) was missing an 'except psv' condition, which I added when I repaired it.  But bases on an earlier edit you would have needed to trash that anyway.  You also found a badly set tag as  psv=bus on a couple of ways which was good to fix but would not have affected anything as bus=yes was set.  *Everything* else was perfect as it was in OSM and it was wrong to change it.  
The 'router' the web service is using is presumably not configured to follow the rules of a bus which can go on bus-only ways and take bus-only turns, and go on private ways if necessary.  This is what I guessed from your edits.  This is a configuration problem with that site, not OSM data.  By trying to allow yourself to follow these ways, to are defining that all road users *in the real world* are allowed to be routed along these ways. Accordingly all these changes (that I have not already done...) will be put back.  The busmiles website must be changed to allow routing using the OSM rules for a bus.
Cebderby
rskedgell (2024-01-04 16:58:41+00:00): I took a a look at a bus route local to me on Busmiles earlier this week.

It uses OSM Carto tiles as a background map via Leaflet, but I do not think it directly uses OSM routing data or bus route relations (OSM is certainly not mentioned as a source at https://busmiles.uk/legal ).

In some cases, it draws a straight line between bus stops. In others, it does appear to follow the courses of roads in OSM, but I suspect these may be provided by a third party.
Đuro Jiří (2024-03-06 06:31:57+00:00): Ciao fayor,ho notato che già qualche anno ( almeno quattro anni) stai cancellando informazioni aggiunte con applicazione StreetComplete (soprattutto accesso ai disabili, piste ciclabili,corsie, superficie stradale). Strano che nessuno ancora non è notato questo VANDALISMO.  Chiedo cortesemente, che subito smetti con questo VANDALISMO. 
Qualcuno sulla bici da strada può andare sulla strada dissestata, perché navigazione non sa superficie della strada. Avrà incidente e se sarà fortunato muore sul posto. Però se avrà sfortuna e sopravvive, rimane disponibile. E dopo avrà problemi, perché navigazione non sa quale negozio sono accessibili ai disabili e quali no.
fayor (2024-03-06 15:08:27+00:00): Te lo scrivo una volta soltanto, sperando di non dovertelo ripetere: puoi non essere d'accordo sul mio modo di mappare ma non chiamarlo vandalismo, che sicuramente non sai di cosa parli. È buona regola di mappatura quello di non aggiungere informazioni superflue, che sono inutili e appesantiscono senza motivo il database. Esistono dei valori di default, che proprio per questo non hanno bisogno di essere specificati: a titolo di esempio, una strada a doppio senso ha due corsie, non serve aggiungere lanes=2; così come una strada a senso unico, se non è altrimenti specificato, ne ha una sola. Se a fianco di una strada non c'è la pista ciclabile non è necessario specificarlo, perché per default di solito una cosa che non è indicata non c'è. Quindi, se puoi, smettila di aggiungere "informazioni" inutili perché è solo una perdita di tempo, sia tua che mia. In ogni caso, come forse sai, non esiste quasi mai un metodo "giusto" di mappatura, condiviso da tutti, e quindi tieni presente che quando intervieni a modificare zone che sono già oggetto di intervento da parte di utenti locali, dei quali non condividi il metodo, sarebbe apprezzato un confronto per capire il modo migliore di agire, e se non si riesce ad arrivare a una soluzione dare la preferenza ai mappatori locali. Spero di essere stato chiaro. Grazie.
dieterdreist (2024-03-07 11:30:04+00:00): sulla questione di default non esiste un consenso nel progetto. Il problema è che non avendo una informazione non si sa mai se era inteso il "default" oppure nessuno ha ancora verificato e inserito questa informazione.
dieterdreist (2024-03-07 11:33:15+00:00): comunque, "cycleway:right=no" senza nessun altro tag sulle infrastrutture e legalità ciclistiche, non mi sembra un buon tag, in questi casi sono d'accordo con Fayor: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/172093526/history
canfe (2024-03-07 12:48:22+00:00): E invece no, è giusto dire che NON c'è una certa cosa. A patto che lo si possa evincere da immagini satellitari o survey sul posto.
amadvance (2024-03-07 13:45:07+00:00): Premetto che mi pare decisamente fuori luogo iniziare un discussione accusando di vandalismo un mappatore che, bisogna sempre supporre, stia operando in buona fede per cercare di migliorare il database. Non è il modo migliore per iniziare una discussione proficua.

Riguardo invece al merito della questione, mappare anche i valori di default ha senso perché indica che è una informazione verificata. Con un semplice valore di default, non si sa se è veramente così, o semplicemente è solo il default. Questo sicuramente appesantisce il database, ma essendo una informazione di valore, ha senso averla.
catonano (2024-03-08 09:49:30+00:00): E' vero che non assumere la buona fede non è il modo migliore di aprire una discussione

Credo sia una differenza di assunti

Duro assume che i suoi contributi (che assolvono al suo caso d'uso specifico) siano legittimi e non sia necessario conquistare il consenso sul suo caso d'uso

E secondo me è un assunto ragionevole

Magari sarebbe opportuno chiedere prima di cancellare il lavoro altrui

Cancellare direttamente perché si ritiene che quei contributi siano "sbagliati" assume che il contributore in questione sia abusivo

Esiste una gerarchia di legittimità dei contributi ?

Mi pare di no

Peraltro, il caso d'uso di Duro (il cicloturismo) mi pare interessante
Đuro Jiří (2024-06-17 11:07:22+00:00): Ciao fayor,
penso che mi devi spiegare ancora una volta, perché stai sempre cancellando informazioni utili aggiunti da altri utenti con applicazione StreetComplete. Se alcuni informazioni, secondo te, sono inutili, sicuramente sono utili per OSM. Non stai facendo una mappa "propria".
soerenwegenertc (2024-01-09 13:07:06+00:00): Hallo KlausDieterSchmitt,

Den Tag amenity=healthcare gibt es nicht (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=healthcare). Daher wird die Apotheke als solche auch nicht mehr gerendert. Ich habe deine Änderung daher wieder rückgangig gemacht und amenity=pharmacy gesetzt.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146065105

Schöne Grüße, Sören
Fizzie-DWG (2023-12-28 23:58:49+00:00): Olá 91RF4455O1 e seja bem-vindo ao OSM. Nessa alteração, você mencionou o uso de um "arquivo de dados geojson". Poderia nos dizer o que é isso e de onde o obteve? Muito obrigado
_______________________
Hello 91RF4455O1 & welcome to OSM. On this change you've mentioned using a "geojson data file". Could you please tell us what that is and where you sourced it from? Thanks
NeisBot (2024-01-01 14:47:30+00:00): Hey 91RF4455O1 👋

Just a heads up, your recent changeset has been marked as the last one in a series. 

If you have any questions or if there's anything you'd like to discuss regarding the mapping, feel free to reach out! We're here to help. 

Best regards, 🤖

Details https://osm.org/user_blocks/15538
#ContributorHasBeenBlocked
nickswalker (2023-12-28 21:06:22+00:00): Hello and thanks for contributing to OSM. It looks like you're trying to mark this street as service road. You've marked it as private though, which does not appear to be the case:
"Note that access=private is intended to indicate that access is restricted." https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Dprivate
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145632900
Stella92 (2023-12-28 21:37:58+00:00): The alley should be marked as private since it is a private alley for residents to use as access to their garages from the alley. It shouldn't be used as anything other than that.
nickswalker (2023-12-28 21:02:02+00:00): Hello and thanks for contributing to OSM. foot=no is used the denote that there is no legal access for pedestrians, which does not appear to be the case here. It looks like you may have been trying to tag a driveway. Take a look at similar case in Wallingford: w408045499
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145632977
Stella92 (2023-12-28 21:36:35+00:00): The private alley that is not designed for pedestrians. It's for access to garages. On Briarcliff Ln West and West Briarcliff Lane there are sidewalks. The alley has a blind corner and if people walk down the alley the wrong way they are at risk of getting hit by a car.
nickswalker (2023-12-28 22:00:34+00:00): Yes, that's correct. However, the foot=no tag indicates that it is illegal for pedestrians to walk on this path. It is used when there is signage prohibiting pedestrian access, which does not appear to be the case here.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145632977
Stella92 (2023-12-28 22:06:39+00:00): That makes sense. I updated the walking to private.
Allison P (2024-01-01 15:39:17+00:00): Is it really a private alley, with a "no trespassing" sign that is legally posted? It appears to be a public right of way.
Stella92 (2024-01-02 23:28:57+00:00): There is no signage but this is a private street and can be confirmed by the City of Seattle. This is not a public right of way and is not designated as a neighborhood street by the City of Seattle.
Allison P (2024-01-03 00:34:51+00:00): Then the residential streets should be tagged ownership=private. I am pretty sure that the alley is public because it serves Viewmont.
Allison P (2024-01-03 06:25:11+00:00): Upon further inspection, it does not serve Viewmont, but it does not appear to be owned by the HOA
Stella92 (2024-01-03 18:03:22+00:00): There is a brick sign that says "Briarcliff" at the corner of W Dravus and Briarcliff Lane West which is the name of the HOA association for these 39 homes. I live in the community so I can also vouch that I pay HOA dues and part of the HOA is maintenance of the alleys along with Briarcliff Lane West and West Briarcliff Lane.
eggie (2023-12-28 19:50:45+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 


MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-07-30 07:39:56+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/730681283/history has surface = straatstenenc that was added in this edit
Which value from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:surface fits? Is it safe to assume and remotely retag with no verification that it is surface=paving_stones? Or can it be also surface=sett or surface=unhewn_cobblestone?
CurlingMan13 (2024-01-10 05:24:10+00:00): 'This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset where the changeset comment is: undo undiscussed and large-scale deletions of paths not open to public - use access=private instead

In OSM, if a trail exists but is not usable (due to being closed, private or simliar) we use the so-called “access tags” to record the fact.

Property owners do not have the right to dictate what we map about their property; we can map private trails all we want as long as we correctly state that these are private.

If you would like to discuss this rule, please bring it up on community.openstreetmap.org. Please do not perform further deletions.'

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146089738
woodpeck_repair (2024-06-15 22:29:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 152740214, 152740288, 152740274, 152740234, 152740192, 152740169, 152740167, 152740249, 152740178 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions by Hamilton 44/Delta Evas ALL, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16207
eggie (2023-12-28 19:59:42+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
andfr (2023-12-28 20:59:16+00:00): Hi Eggie,

Thank you for your welcome.
I don't speak dutch, so I will answer in englisch.

I am very careful in changing anything, as I know there are a lot of people investing their time into keeping OSM up to date.

Happy mapping ;)

BR,
Andreas
eggie (2023-12-28 21:03:07+00:00): Hi Andreas..
Google translate will do the miracle 😀

Greetz..
eggie
mcliquid (2023-12-29 15:23:29+00:00): Hi,

just a general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
eggie (2023-12-28 19:56:03+00:00): De tagging van de school heb ik verplaatst naar het terrein en amenity=school toegevoegd
ctrl f5 voor het effect
gr eggie
pio2_122 (2023-12-28 23:57:56+00:00): Drobna uwaga dot. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9165722204 - jak widać, ten węzeł został przypadkowo przeciągnięty o kilkanaście metrów.
pio2_122 (2023-12-30 13:50:04+00:00): edit: poprawiłem przy okazji innej edycji.
d3mol3k (2023-12-30 19:40:16+00:00): to ja go tak przeciągnąłem? sorka
pio2_122 (2023-12-30 19:56:11+00:00): Tak - https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/node/9165722204
Ale nie ma sprawy :)

Moim zdaniem, wynika to w dużym stopniu ze specyfiki edytora iD.
Czasami wystarczy tam tylko kliknąć na jakiś obiekt i już następuje jego edycja (np. połączenie go z innym). O ile wiem, nie ma tam też ostrzeżeń, które „zabezpieczają” przed przypadkowymi edycjami jak w JOSM'ie.
d3mol3k (2023-12-30 19:58:36+00:00): kilka razy użyłem tego edytora - wolę w josm pracować. dzięki za info i poprawę. Szczęśliwego  Nowego Roku :)
pio2_122 (2023-12-30 20:07:56+00:00): Dzięki i wzajemnie :)
bisonprarieafternoon (2023-12-29 02:20:23+00:00): You asked for a review, the edits to the Pathfinder look good, the way the road was attached to the water tap I don't believe is correct, I can clean up the roads a bit in that area. As well I think amenity=drinking_water would have been a good tag to add to that public water faucet as I assume this is drinking water?
silversurfer83 (2023-12-28 20:44:58+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap kaufi584

schön, dass du hilfst die Karte aktuell zu halten. Vielen Dank :)

Diese Kommentare in der sogenannten Änderungssatzdiskussion dienen uns bei OSM dazu Fragen zu stellen und Dinge mit Bezug zu der Änderung zu besprechen. Das möchte ich an dieser Stelle mal tun:

Am südöstlichen Ende des Weges steht ein Schild "1,5t; Land- und Forst frei" wie auf diesem Bild
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=570741771273373&focus=photo
ist das richtig?

Freue mich von dir zu hören
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145634648
bxl-forever (2023-12-28 21:43:49+00:00): Hello,

There is already a Lebanese restaurant in this building.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9713094717

In your edit, you added NYYÓ as if it was a second restaurant in the same house.  This would be very surprising.  I suppose you wanted to replace the existing object instead of creating a new one.

I can fix it but could you please tell us what you saw here?
kayllab (2023-12-28 22:00:24+00:00): Hello! 

Sorry it's my first contribution, but yes I meant to replace the old Lebanese restaurant now closed. Nyyo opened in its place at #38.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2024-02-29 01:45:32+00:00): isso não parece footway: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1234996462 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dfootway
raphaelmirc (2024-02-29 11:29:11+00:00): Bom dia Erick.

Corrigi e inclui novas vias que faltava em toda a Cidade.
JeroenHoek (2023-12-29 12:54:55+00:00): If you map the area of the marina (great!), please include the land area as well, not just the water.
andfr (2023-12-29 20:44:02+00:00): Hi Jeroen,
I am a bit lost with your request. What do you mean with "include the land as well"? It's my first contribution here.
JeroenHoek (2023-12-30 08:33:09+00:00): I'm sorry, I didn't notice that. Thanks for taking the time to improve the map.

When mapping a marina, you should draw an outline around not just the water basin, but also the facilities on land (like the toilets, front desk, etc.). Usually the whole grounds. So leisure=marina shouldn't share the same shape as natural=water. This used to be neglected, so you can often see examples where only the water is tagged with leisure=marina. Here in Terherne this happened too.

The wiki can help:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dmarina

Or in German if you like (the created_by tag of your changeset indicates you run JOSM in German):

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure%3Dmarina
Vinber-Pro (2024-01-18 16:57:35+00:00): hi sfranck
do you know why there is 2 objects for dam ?
this https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100497100
and this https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/205729455

it's a practice or an error ?

regards
sfrank (2024-01-19 19:18:28+00:00): hi,
I asked myself the same thing when I changed there.
there were 2 objects/ways ID:205729455 and ID:100497100 for Farakka Barrage. I didn't change it because I wasn't sure why, too.
dam ID 100497100 was created by PlaneMad changeset #7334148 13 years ago, dam with ID 205729455 was created by Japa 11 years ag (changeset  #15048310) 
regards
Vinber-Pro (2024-01-25 16:46:15+00:00): hi,
i think https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/205729455 is better as area.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100497100 is "only a way", i erased this duplicate
regards
Vinber-Pro (2024-01-25 16:49:01+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146681038
eggie (2023-12-28 20:24:26+00:00): shop supermarket verwijderd van gebouwomtrek.
MVg
eggie
eggie (2023-12-28 20:27:53+00:00): Straatnaam teruggezet. Waarom zou deze weg niet bestaan? 
Wanneer je overtuigt bent dat de straat niet bestaat kun je dat doorgeven aan het Kadaster via deze site
https://www.verbeterdekaart.nl/#?geometry.x=134029.48&geometry.y=411409.46&zoomlevel=14.29
eggie (2023-12-28 20:35:09+00:00): OSM zit vol met addertjes. Ik heb de tunnel weer verwijderd.
In OSM is het als viaduct gemapt.
Het is het één of het ander.

Er lopen vele draadjes over op het forum.
Groet
eggie