piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2023-02-26 09:15:41+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, during the validation process
I noticed that you are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.
We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.
Each rectangular building need to be squared. !!  Q key when still selected
Nodes of buildings may not connect to other buildings or features.
The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 
Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.





Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132594084
Frans S (2023-02-22 14:22:49+00:00): 
Hello. Thanks for mapping on this difficult task.
About mapping of tall apartment blocks

Mapping of tall buildings differs from standard buildings. Because the imagery is taken at an angle, you see both the rooflines and also the side of a building. 
How do you map such a building?
Map over the rooflines and lastly slide the mapped building to the footprint.
Here is a video how that is done.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1V5-bADsYiffCD9bo6l64YOdTvmKqMGry/view?usp=share_link

And.... don't forget to square each rectangular building.

Best regards and keep mapping
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-06 07:14:28+00:00): Have you mapped name "House 3" from aerial imagery, added it as test?

Or have you visited this specific place and know something about it https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1146044118/history ?
BCNorwich (2023-02-16 09:21:39+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Unfortunately your mapping features have introduced serious problems to the OSM database from several duplicated incorrectly tagged highways. Thus I've reverted the changes.
Please learn about OSM best practices before adding more changes.

Regards Bernard.
Frans S (2023-03-07 12:18:47+00:00): Hello. 
Thanks for mapping on this project.
We welcome you as a new mapper.
Have you not read this paragraph on the instructions ?
Some mapping hints to map roads
Please don’t spend time on mapping traces leading to, and ending in farmland. Focus on through roads (most tagged unclassified).
You could spend your time better on mapping the required objects.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132595406
mtmail (2023-02-16 20:39:49+00:00): What does "BB KeyChain #1" mean? It's not a postcode (ZIP code). Imagery suggests the position is a residential address. I can't find any other information online when looking for BB KeyChain or the changeset comment.
mtmail (2023-02-16 20:45:22+00:00): The house number 87124 seems to be the ZIP code of the area. With only the zip code usable I'd delete this address unless I hear back from user.
MarkusHD (2023-02-17 08:23:38+00:00): Der Weg unter der Brücke ist kein Tunnel, hab dieses tagging wieder entfernt:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132663474
Frans S (2023-02-20 16:36:55+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. However, Tall buildings are not properly mapped and most of your mappings are not squared.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132595754
Tomas Straupis (2023-02-16 12:38:12+00:00): Islandijos 67 nušoko nuo tikros pozicijos kažkur greta kogeneracinės jėgainės už Kauno ribų. Šitas taškas 10665327438.
Frans S (2023-02-20 10:28:48+00:00): Hello, Thanks for mapping on this project.
Please do not cluster buildings and map it as 1 building. Each building has to be mapped individually.
And... please square each rectangular building with the Q key.
Best regards and keep mapping
KTim (2023-06-12 16:03:55+00:00): Hej andershl,

According to the guidebook the cycle route "Flensburg Fjord Route" isn't signposted. Has this changed? Otherwise I wouldn't think it belongs in the OSM database. Or if a source existsts, that can be used according to the license conditions, I would add a "state=proposed".

Mange Hilsner,
Tim
Enock4seth (2023-06-02 13:05:14+00:00): The building look good but avoid changing exiting objects to something  they aren't, e.g. changing a town to a sauna as you did in version 7 at https://osm.mapki.com/history/node/2115724530
Thierry1030 (2023-12-17 15:08:17+00:00): Dag Tom,
Ik heb gisteren foto's genomen van een aantal voetwegen tussen de Spaanse Lindebaan en het Tangebeekbos.
De voetweg 90 tussen het Fluxysstation en de Drijfstraat heb ik niet gevonden -> https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1407739476619997
Is dit een bestaand pad? Heeft u er zelf al over gewandeld/gereden?
Dank voor het antwoord.
Tom Ameye (2023-12-18 07:46:35+00:00): Dag Thierry, mooi werk op mapillary!
Dit is een oude voetweg. Het verdere verloop van de voetweg ligt zoals ingetekend ten westen van het talud. Hij is wel soms moeilijk begaanbaar omdat de landbouwer(s) vaak (illegaal) te dicht bij de weg omploegen. Ik gebruik deze weg regelmatig. Enkel geschikt voor voetgangers.  Er zijn langs deze weg ook heel wat waarnemingen op waarnemingen.be. Een deel van deze voetweg is zeer waardevol op de Biologische Waarderingskaart. 
mvg
Tom
Frans S (2023-03-09 15:08:11+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, during the validation process.

I noticed that you are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.

We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. Just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.

Please map each building accurate over the rooflines.

Square each rectangular building with the Q key.

Nodes of buildings may NOT  connect to other buildings or features.

The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 

Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.


See also this documenthttps://drive.google.com/file/d/11PsAW0bzUZHbS8YnbaFzqOYhJY7tSPYG/view?usp=share_link


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132596464
h_i_ (2023-09-20 09:40:57+00:00): Hallo Rongel,
ich bin der Meinung es ist sinnvoller für den Park die Fläche zu nutzen, die als outer im Multipolygon gekennzeichnet ist, schließlich sind die Teiche auch selbst Teil des Parks.
Ich schlage vor, dass ich die Relation entferne und die Eigenschaften auf die Fläche übertrage.
Viele Grüße
h_i_
Rongel (2023-09-20 10:49:26+00:00): Ok
h_i_ (2023-10-07 09:43:28+00:00): Ich habe es geändert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142261632
Jim Bedient (2023-02-15 19:05:28+00:00): iD inserted all the tags from the challenge in Turkey, I'm not sure why. :-(
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-06 09:55:59+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/271966749/history

why you changed amenity=pharmacy to disused:amenity healthcare pharmacy?

How something can be a disused and active pharmacy at the same time?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-09 10:52:17+00:00): PMed user with "can you take a look at comment in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132596997 ?"
Rick Richards (2025-05-09 12:41:39+00:00): Hi Mateusz, apologies for not responding sooner, I must have forgotten about this. Do be honest I don't remember exactly why I've added "healthcare=pharmacy" to disused pharmacy, as you've clearly stated something cannot be disused and active at the same time.

I've corrected it in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165902443

Sorry for confusion, will be careful in the future, thanks.
Глеб (2023-03-01 08:20:12+00:00): а что это и откуда?
Frans S (2023-02-17 15:17:07+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
Didn't you read the instructions and hints regarding mapping of tracks ?
No need to map these. We concentrate on through roads
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2023-02-26 15:51:21+00:00): 
Hello. Thanks for mapping on this difficult task.
About mapping of tall apartment blocks

Mapping of tall buildings differs from standard buildings. Because the imagery is taken at an angle, you see both the rooflines and also the side of a building. 
How do you map such a building?
Map over the rooflines and lastly slide the mapped building to the footprint.
Please adjust wrong positioned buildings as well
This video shows how that is done.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1V5-bADsYiffCD9bo6l64YOdTvmKqMGry/view?usp=share_link

And.... don't forget to square each rectangular building.

Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2023-02-28 17:10:47+00:00): Hello. You have tagged highways incorrect.
Please read this wiki to know how to tag highways.
f.i. Roads lined with (a few) buildings is not a track.
roads in rural areas are never tagged as residential.
I corrected them here.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132597203
LeNetsi (2023-02-15 22:02:53+00:00): Correction: Source used was Maxar SecureWatch Imagery 2022-04-18.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132597232
Frans S (2023-02-18 14:41:54+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, at random or as requested. 
Hello. I noticed that you are a new mapper. Welcome to the HOTOSM world.|
I noticed that you start with a rather difficult task, Urban area with many tall buildings. I would advise that you, as a beginner mapper, focus for the time being on easier, less difficult tasks.

Please pay attention to next points:
Square each rectangular building
Do not connect nodes of buildings to other features. 




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132597402
Frans S (2023-02-18 14:42:49+00:00): Continuing of previous message.


Mapping of tall buildings differs from standard buildings. Because the imagery is taken at an angle, you see both the roof lines and also the side of a building. 
How do you map such a building?
Map over the roof lines and lastly slide the mapped building to the footprint.
Here is a video how that is done.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1V5-bADsYiffCD9bo6l64YOdTvmKqMGry/view?usp=share_link

And.... don't forget to square each rectangular building.

Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132597402
Msiipola (2023-04-22 10:09:03+00:00): Hej! I detta område har du lagt till ett vattendrag (stream) som korsar väg (Orrmyrvägarna). Sådana korsningar behöver antingen sättas som bro på vägen eller tunnel/culvert på vattendraget. 
Jag fixar det här felet, men tänk på detta i liknande fall.
Msiipola (2023-04-22 10:11:06+00:00): I samma område finns det flera liknade korsningar som behöver bro eller tunnel(kulvert)
amadvance (2023-02-16 17:21:09+00:00): Ciao Massimo,

Meglio non usare la mappa Bing per fare correzioni. Questa mappa ha sempre uno scostamento notevole. 

Meglio usare le Esri.

Ciao,
Andrea
Massimo Orizio (2023-02-16 17:59:24+00:00): ciao non so usare la mappa bing io uso l'editor di open openstreemap del broswere
amadvance (2023-02-16 21:47:59+00:00): Ciao Massimo,

Nell'editor nel browser, se clicchi nella barra a destra, puoi selezionare il layer di background. Prova con uno dei due Esri, sono molto più precisi delle immagini Bing che sono selezionate di default.

Ciao,
Andrea
Massimo Orizio (2023-02-17 17:37:42+00:00): ottimo ho guardato in effetti sono più dettagliate e anche aggiornate. grazie.
aphase (2023-08-03 08:55:27+00:00): Hier scheint es zeitlich Überschneidungen mit mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132552575 gegeben zu haben, so dass in der Gegend um den Gerberbruch Doppelungen gibt, z.B. Brücken übereinander.
Frans S (2023-02-20 16:30:58+00:00): 
Hello. Thanks for mapping on this difficult task.
About mapping of tall apartment blocks

Mapping of tall buildings differs from standard buildings. Because the imagery is taken at an angle, you see both the rooflines and also the side of a building. 
How do you map such a building?
Map over the rooflines and lastly slide the mapped building to the footprint.
Here is a video how that is done.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1V5-bADsYiffCD9bo6l64YOdTvmKqMGry/view?usp=share_link

And.... don't forget to square each rectangular building.

Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2023-02-18 09:37:53+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this difficult task.
Mapping of tall (high) buildings.  

mapping of tall buildings differs from standard buildings. Because the imagery is taken at an angle, you see both the roof lines and also the side of a building. 
How do you map such a building?
Map over the roof lines and lastly slide the mapped building to the footprint.
Here is a video how that is done.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1V5-bADsYiffCD9bo6l64YOdTvmKqMGry/view?usp=share_link

Best regards.
Frans S (2023-02-18 11:49:33+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this difficult task.
Mapping of tall (high) buildings.  

mapping of tall buildings differs from standard buildings. Because the imagery is taken at an angle, you see both the roof lines and also the side of a building. 
How do you map such a building?
Map over the roof lines and lastly slide the mapped building to the footprint.
Here is a video how that is done.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1V5-bADsYiffCD9bo6l64YOdTvmKqMGry/view?usp=share_link

Best regards.
Frans S (2023-02-23 15:05:08+00:00): 
Hello. Thanks for mapping on this difficult task.
About mapping of tall apartment blocks

Mapping of tall buildings differs from standard buildings. Because the imagery is taken at an angle, you see both the rooflines and also the side of a building. 
How do you map such a building?
Map over the rooflines and lastly slide the mapped building to the footprint.
Please adjust wrong positioned buildings as well
This video shows how that is done.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1V5-bADsYiffCD9bo6l64YOdTvmKqMGry/view?usp=share_link

And.... don't forget to square each rectangular building.

Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2023-02-22 09:18:56+00:00): Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132598050
Frans S (2023-02-22 09:23:54+00:00): When you come across tall buildings which need to be mapped as well, it is good to know how to map these.
About mapping of tall apartment blocks

Mapping of tall buildings differs from standard buildings. Because the imagery is taken at an angle, you see both the rooflines and also the side of a building. 
How do you map such a building?
Map over the rooflines and lastly slide the mapped building to the footprint.
Here is a video how that is done.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1V5-bADsYiffCD9bo6l64YOdTvmKqMGry/view?usp=share_link

And.... don't forget to square each rectangular building.

Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132598050
Frans S (2023-02-23 09:00:02+00:00): Hello Livia Mai. 
Now I am validating your mappings and am sorry to see that you mapped quite a lot of clusters as 1 building. I have to remove them, and they need to be mapped again ( Buildings need to be mapped individually to be able to track the situation with the collapsed buildings.)
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132598050
Frans S (2023-02-21 17:04:11+00:00): Hello. We welcome you as a new mapper. 
Buildings mapped for HOTOSM are default tagged as building=yes.

Thanks for mapping on this difficult task.
About mapping of tall apartment blocks

Mapping of tall buildings differs from standard buildings. Because the imagery is taken at an angle, you see both the rooflines and also the side of a building. 
How do you map such a building?
Map over the rooflines and lastly slide the mapped building to the footprint.
Here is a video how that is done.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1V5-bADsYiffCD9bo6l64YOdTvmKqMGry/view?usp=share_link

And.... don't forget to square each rectangular building.

Best regards and keep mapping
-karlos- (2025-05-06 14:08:35+00:00): Way 1146073384 is a building:part but not a closed way! 3 nodes in a line and a small bit in the south.
It is a part of way Way: 1146073382
Cebderby (2025-05-06 14:16:16+00:00): Good spot, thanks. Tidied up in ch. 165894556
Shaun das Schaf (2023-02-16 10:15:43+00:00): Hallo FortunaTheFox, willkommen bei OSM!

Was genau sind das für Straßen?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/758480749
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/930877307

Du hast die umgetaggt von "highway=service" auf "private=service" bzw. "private=yes".

Wenn es sich um private Zufahrtsstraßen handelt, so ist "highway=service" + "private=yes" die richtige Kombination.

Bitte noch korrigieren.

Viele Grüße
Shaun das Schaf
Shaun das Schaf (2023-02-16 10:16:51+00:00): Du kannst übrigens Gebäude rechtwinklig machen, indem du sie im Editor auswählst und dann die Taste "Q" drückst.

Dieses von dir eingezeichnete Gebäude
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1146073675
ist im Moment noch ziemlich krumm und schief ;-)
Tjuro_Global (2023-02-18 22:14:35+00:00): Hello,

I see that you have added some landuse=village_green. Please read:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dvillage_green
Would a more specific tag like grass or shrubbery be more appropriate?
Please read:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landcover%3Dgreenery
For a list of alternative tags.

Greetings Tjuro
Jakka (2023-02-19 07:51:08+00:00): done
aceman444 (2025-07-19 20:07:24+00:00): Zdravim, vsetky cesty v parkovisku su betonove. Preco ste dali na parkovisko asfalt? Zeby parkovacie miesta boli asfaltove? Z Ortotofoto nemaju velmi farbu ako cesty.
Pavol33 (2025-07-20 05:29:48+00:00): Ahoj, prosim oprav to. Ja netusim, preco som to vtedy tak dal. Ci to bol omyl alebo co. Vtedy som s upravami len zacinal. Dakujem.
aceman444 (2025-07-20 13:39:16+00:00): Dobre, dakujem.
streckenkundler (2023-02-15 20:44:47+00:00): Ei,Ei,Ei...

... du bist hier sowas von Aktiv! 

Einfach nur Danke sagende Grüße,

Sven
Frans S (2023-02-20 12:06:02+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this difficult task.
About mapping of tall apartment blocks

Mapping of tall buildings differs from standard buildings. Because the imagery is taken at an angle, you see both the rooflines and also the side of a building. 
How do you map such a building?
Map over the rooflines and lastly slide the mapped building to the footprint.
Here is a video how that is done.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1V5-bADsYiffCD9bo6l64YOdTvmKqMGry/view?usp=share_link

And.... don't forget to square each rectangular building.

Best regards and keep mapping
kadiwa (2025-03-05 14:23:16+00:00): Das kurze Straßenstück hier heißt nicht Arnoldstraße. Da hat jemand einfach das Straßenschild verdreht. 5 Meter weiter befindet sich ein weiteres Straßenschild, was bestätigt, dass auch dieser Straßenabschnitt Rothestraße heißt.
Frans S (2023-02-18 09:24:11+00:00): Maping of tall (high buildings.  


mapping of tall buildings is different from standard buildings. Because the imagery is taken at an angle, you see both the roof lines and also the side of a building. 
How do you map such a building?
Map over the roof lines and lastly slide the mapped building to the footprint.
Here is a video how that is done.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1V5-bADsYiffCD9bo6l64YOdTvmKqMGry/view?usp=share_link

Best regards.
hsc666 (2023-02-16 15:32:45+00:00): Hallo drolbr_google! 

Warum hast Du den Weg für Fahrräder gesperrt?

VG
hsc666
drolbr_google (2023-02-16 16:13:24+00:00): Es handelt sich um einen normalen Bürgersteig. Die baulichen Gegebenheiten, dass ein gemischter Rad- und Fußweg an einen reinen Fußweg grenzt und es keinen abgesenkten Bordstein zur Straße hin gibt, sind schlicht untauglich für den Fahrradverkehr.
hsc666 (2023-02-16 16:21:45+00:00): Der Weg ist weiter vorn mit Zeichen 240 "Gemeinsamer Geh- und Radweg" beschildert; die Widmung wird zu keinem Zeitpunkt aufgehoben. https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1083025662571753
drolbr_google (2023-02-16 20:47:43+00:00): Das Bild ist weit entfernt von der fraglichen Stelle. Ich wohne dort in der Nähe.
Nochmal: die Radverkehrsanlage ist legal nicht benutzbar, weil sie ohne Überleitstelle von dem abgesetzten Weg in einen Bürgersteig ohne Mindestbreiten und mit Hindernissen (Bushaltestelle, Ampelmast, Verkehrsschilder) übergeht, auf dem kein benutzungspflichtiger Radweg **wegen der Unfallgefahr mit Fußgängern** ausgewiesen werden kann. Das ist in Wuppertal (und auch manchen anderen Städten) nicht so ungewöhnlich, an Fahrradfahrer wurde da jahrzehntelang nicht gedacht. Wir sollten dann aber nicht falsch Radfahrer auf den Bürgersteig schicken.
Von unten gibt es übrigens keine Beschilderung oder sonstige Kennzeichnung, und die Ampel hat auch einen reinen Fußgängerüberweg ohne irgendeine Radfahrer-Berücksichtigung.
hsc666 (2023-02-17 11:53:58+00:00): Das Zeichen 240 steht 657 Meter (was mMn nicht "weit entfernt" ist) vor der Stelle, von der Du behauptest, dass ab dort die Nutzung mit dem Fahrrad verboten ist. D.h. wir stimmen noch soweit überein, dass https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1052613435 für die Nutzung mit einem Fahrrad erlaubt ist? Und am Punkt https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10544059353 - was ungefähr diese Stelle hier ist https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=666476641110702 - behauptest Du, dass ein Verbot der Nutzung durch Fahrräder beginnt? Woraus ergibt sich dMn dieses Verbot, wenn dort offensichtlich nichts vor Ort darauf hinweist? Zudem hast Du mit Deiner Änderung den way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1052613435 zu einer unüberwindlichen Sackgasse gemacht. Nicht sehr plausibel.
drolbr_google (2023-02-19 08:48:36+00:00): Nochmal die Frage: Hast Du da Ortskenntnis?

Die Situation ist, auch nach Selbsteinschätzung der Stadt Wuppertal, baulich mangelhaft. Was man ansonsten noch machen könnte, ist bei der Stadt Wuppertal nachfragen, was denn da eigentlich gedacht ist, wie es sein soll.