piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
CjMalone (2025-05-25 10:03:38+00:00): Please don't delete buildings and addresses just because a business has closed.
jmann6 (2025-05-25 15:15:52+00:00): Good point.  Next time I'll keep the building and address name and remove the business name. Or provide more information.  Thanks!
Gustavo22Soares (2025-07-12 23:52:31+00:00): Oi, tudo bem? to corrigindo alguns erros de curvas agudas e sempre estou encontrando um padrão na via de acesso a rotatorias mapeadas por você, é legal deixar que cada via seja uma linha independente por questões de boas praticas e para evitar error no roteamento
NeisBot (2025-05-25 02:33:53+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
pitscheplatsch (2025-05-25 11:02:55+00:00): Corrected by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166722046
okadatsuneo (2025-05-26 14:30:04+00:00): AofOSMさん、こんにちは。
1つお願いがあります。
residentialや公園、学校の敷地エリアを道路のウェイに接続されていますが、もしよろしければ、道路の幅員分は離して道路とノードを共有しないようにエリアを作成いただけるとありがたいです。
編集画面でぱっと見でどこが道路かわかりにくいですし、道路の線形を変更・修正したい時に全部くっついているとやりにくいので。
ご検討のほどよろしくお願いします。
AofOSM (2025-05-28 08:30:44+00:00): kadatsuneoさま、コメントありがとうございます。
自分がエリアを道路のノードと共有したのは、レンダリングされた地図表示において、道路の端とエリアの間に、そこに何があるわけでもないのに隙間ができる（ズームレベルを上げるほど顕著）のを避けるためです。この記述方法がルールを逸脱しているのであれば、改めたいと思います。
ただ、自分はPCの編集画面で作業をしていますが、ぱっと見で道路が分かりにくいこともなく、道路の線形の変更、修正時もむしろ道路とエリアを別々に修正する必要もなく、特に問題は生じていないとの認識です。
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-01-13 09:14:02+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/275823308/history has shop = beer that was added in this edit
shop=beer ? Maybe shop=alcohol alcohol=beer would work well, indicating that shop sells primarily this alcohol? Having separate shop types for sake, whisky, cider, beer, wine, red wine etc etc seems a poor idea while cascading tagging still provides full info for anyone interested while providing also top-level basic info for someone wanting 100 shop types rather than 10 000.

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=alcohol
redd (2026-01-13 09:56:19+00:00): Hello Mateusz,
Beer is not necessarily alcohol anymore these days. There are a lot of alcohol free (0,0% beers). 

So in my opinion shop=beer cannot be a subcategory of shop=alcohol. Better would be the more general tag shop=beverages. Also brewery beer shops in Germany usually brew and sell some soft drinks, too.

I would suggest that you stop making proposals for shop=beer to shop=alcohol in Germany. Instead think about shop=beverages.

Yours,

Redd
Stalker61 (2026-06-06 12:44:01+00:00): Потрясающая адреска! 
Вы сами хоть определитесь, какая адресация предпочтительнее (по улице или территории).
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Адреса
Адресация не обрабатывается, если одновременно задана и полигоном и линией улицы. 11А микрорайон такая же хрень наляпана. Еще и suburb прикручен.
А neighbourhood указать не судьба? 
Вот три КП от Евросиба. Изучаем, как правильно делать двойную адресацию https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/60.30516/29.56848
Ну и авторские косяки в Нефтеюганске за собой приводим в порядок.
Hidden Mountain (2025-05-26 07:28:34+00:00): Место под палатку на гребне зря удалили, там оно действительно есть.
Ruslan Fatih (2025-05-26 13:47:01+00:00): Сорри. Я похоже из-за мисклика удалил случайно. Вернул.
user_5359 (2025-05-26 09:10:27+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/400959482 (one of three). What is the mean of the tag "roof:"="yes"?
Pan (2025-05-26 09:34:13+00:00): Thanks for pointing that out. It was obviously a mistake from my side, fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166769618
ArchangelEkim (2025-05-25 10:03:11+00:00): Heyo, is there a reason or justification you can provide for this significant changeset. This amount of roads being upped to 'primary' is a big change especially as a first contribution.
aharvey (2025-05-26 01:35:23+00:00): 1. these road classification changes are a bit controversial, I'd encourage you to discuss changes about why you believe they should be changed. In the meantime, I've reverted these changes in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166756107, however retained the correct addition of lanes=2 and surface=asphalt, 
2. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2820113434 was an address node and had the bus stop tags moved to it, given the address was for the house and there was no reason to loose the history of the bus stop tags.
3. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/5168728 appears to be a 2 lane road. lanes=1 is very uncommon for a two way road.
Gustavo22Soares (2025-10-14 14:11:17+00:00): arvores devem ser mapeadas como pontos não como areas verdes
0235 (2025-06-07 21:03:30+00:00): 1 what? What changes and modifications have you made to the map? Are you able to elaborate more with your changeset comments?
luiswoo (2025-05-26 14:42:14+00:00): Пожарное депо — это официальное название здания? Если нет, то это нужно перенести в описание.
Luzandro (2025-05-27 05:58:10+00:00): Hallo,

wenn sich die Straße gerade im Bau befindet, bzw. für längere Zeit umgebaut wird und nicht benutzt werden kann, solltest du highway=construction statt construction=yes verwenden

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway=construction

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:construction=yes?uselang=de
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166721185
DerKaiserschmarren (2025-05-27 10:22:34+00:00): Stimmt. Das habe ich hier vergessen.
Danke nochmal für den Hinweis ;)
Grass-snake (2025-05-25 12:34:58+00:00): Здравствуйте, в ФИАС в этом СНТ используются не "ряд", а "проезд". Можно я поменяю на проезды?

https://fias.nalog.ru/Search/IndexWithPath?objectId=1425699&addressType=2
desk77 (2025-05-25 14:24:46+00:00): Здравствуйте. Да, поменяйте. Название "ряд"я брал из Росреестра.
desk77 (2025-05-25 14:34:11+00:00): Возможно тогда и здесь нужно поменять на "проезд"?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/61.155531/72.588789
Ethan Grobin (2025-05-29 16:45:53+00:00): Why did you delete the roof over the netball court at mentone park in this changeset and delete 13 1-3 Southern Road? These all exist.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166721338
nevw (2025-05-29 18:52:26+00:00): Apologies, it is visible on Esri imagery. I’ll fix soon by reverting part of the changeset.
Ethan Grobin (2025-05-29 18:57:20+00:00): I've already fixed it :)
nevw (2025-05-29 19:24:52+00:00): Thanks Eatham
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-31 08:44:52+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/244040090/history has roof_shape = gabled that was added in this edit
Maybe roof:shape=gabled was intended here?

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape
aharvey (2025-05-26 01:18:56+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12861961858 could also be two different nodes, one for 4A and another for 4B
snid678 (2025-05-26 08:11:21+00:00): Hi. Agree to the two different nodes. Both were merged automatically when they were added (likely had them too close together). I have split them back to 2 seperate nodes.
zstadler (2025-05-28 08:03:45+00:00): A resort should also "provide housing accommodations for customers".
According to their website, this not the case here.
SafwatHalaby (2025-05-28 08:41:52+00:00): You're correct.

How do you think this should be tagged?
SafwatHalaby (2025-05-28 09:57:15+00:00): Come to think of it, the OSM wiki definition might be too strict. The word "Resort" is typically defined as "a self-contained commercial establishment that aims to provide most of a vacationer's needs", and this is also how it's used in OSM when tagging "beach resorts". I don't see why overnight sleeps should be part of the definition.
zstadler (2025-05-28 21:26:27+00:00): I was unable to find a relevant tagging in the wiki. I suggest you ask in the tagging questions forum.
map per (2025-05-25 20:15:32+00:00): Wegen review_requested:
Die Änderung sieht gut aus, danke!
NorthCrab_upload (2025-05-25 07:30:52+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12861996045

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
luiswoo (2025-05-26 14:41:19+00:00): Почему служенный\дворовой проезд оформлен как пешеходная улица (living_street)?
Znaika (2025-05-25 13:20:45+00:00): Hallo, das hat ja lange gedauert. 4 Jahre! Ich lösche noch die Baustelle. VG, Znaika
Znaika (2025-05-25 13:22:08+00:00): Oder ist es noch nicht zu Ende? :-) Falsch gelesen und verstanden
guerda (2025-05-25 13:28:39+00:00): Die Baustelle ist weiterhin da, das Gebäude ist im Rohbau. Die Aktualisierung kam nur, weil Street complete mich gefragt hat, ob sie endlich fertig sind. Antwort bleibt nein.
mikedld (2025-05-25 23:20:28+00:00): Hi PriceyPanda, and welcome to OSM! A few notes on your changes here:
* phones should be in international format, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone
* specific website URLs should be preferred over homepages, https should be preferred over http, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:website
* "Quinta do Moniz" is not a street name
* would be interesting to know your source for the Pingo Doce postal code, the one used previously was taken from their website

Would you please revise according to the above? I can do it for you (basically revert to the previous values) if you want.

Happy mapping ;)
user_22800169 (2025-05-26 16:37:51+00:00): Hi mikedld what's up?, ok I'm going to use international numbers and https for my future editions, my source was Google Maps, and yeah, change it please, have a nice day.
mikedld (2025-05-26 19:15:01+00:00): Hi PriceyPanda, please refer to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google for this specific case, and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_We_Map in general. There's if course much more information on the wiki you might find useful. Looking forward to your future contributions ;)
mikedld (2025-05-26 22:59:30+00:00): Amended in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166800479. Feel free to update the addresses again once e.g. confirmed on the ground.
Jordi MF (2025-05-25 18:36:56+00:00): Hola Estercolium

¿Puedes indicar una fuente que indique un uso de las etiquetas name:es?
eggie (2025-05-25 08:57:55+00:00): Dag Daniel... oneway=-1 is niet gebruikelijk.
Beter de richting van de weg omkeren.
Vaak zijn tweewielers uitgezonderd va oneway=yes .Is dat hier het geval?
Dan ook de uitzonderingen toevoegen oneway:bicycle=no en evt ook voor mofa moped.
MVG
eggie
Daniel Blake (2025-05-25 09:54:38+00:00): Hoi eggie,
ik heb de weg omgedraaid en oneway op yes gezet. Helaas geen uitzonderingen voor fietsers of bromfietsers hier...
eggie (2025-05-25 09:59:19+00:00): Oke Daniël.. Ik heb de uitzonderingen voor fietsers weer verwijderd.
Mapse
eggie
NieWnen (2025-05-27 18:43:33+00:00): Proszę nie ignoruj ostrzeżeń edytora. DDR powinien przecinać się z chodnikami, za to nie powinien się przecinać z linią wysokiego napięcia.

Tam gdzie są CPRy warto je od razu mapować niż prowadzić tylko DDRa. 

Zapoznaj się proszę z tagowaniem: 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Rowery#Drogi_dla_pieszych_i_rower%C3%B3w
bxl-forever_repair (2025-05-25 09:21:36+00:00): Your changeset has been reverted.
Please do not add names to boundaries between municipalities.
Tjuro (2025-05-25 08:27:12+00:00): Beste Pieter Hilkemeijer,

Gebouwen worden geïmporteerd vanuit het kadaster, Als iets niet klopt kan je het her importeren,

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/beta-testers-voor-de-bag-update-plugin-gezocht/76738/20

Of vragen via het forum tot herimport:

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/bag-importverzoeken/3394/3386

Maar gelieve niet handmatig gebouwen of adressen aan te passen.

Met vriendelijke groet,

Tjuro
Pieter Hilkemeijer (2025-05-25 11:25:22+00:00): hi, okay bedankt. Daar was ik niet van op de hoogte. Ik zal een verzoek voor herimport doen.
eggie (2025-05-25 09:00:57+00:00): Dag Joshua.. Een barrier=lift_gate vastmaken aan het wegdeel svp.

MVG
eggie
user_5359 (2025-05-25 08:30:50+00:00): wrong comment: Typo type
Mannivu (2025-05-25 09:06:44+00:00): Ciao e grazie per l'aggiunta. Ti faccio solo un appunto: Gmaps non è da utilizzare come fonte di dati perché sono coperti da copyright e con una licenza non compatibile con OpenStreetMap
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166724555
Fabio6484 (2025-05-25 09:27:30+00:00): Ciao, scusa, non ci avevo pensato. Grazie per il chiarimento.
silversurfer83 (2025-05-25 20:55:42+00:00): Hi :)

in dem Fall wäre "access=private" korrekt. Jedoch möchte ich vorher wissen, ob es hier rechtlich überhaupt zulässig ist, die Nutzung für Fußgänger und Radfahrer einzuschränken.

Bitte um Rückmeldung

silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166724592
silversurfer83 (2025-12-18 08:43:08+00:00): Moin,

wie ist denn hier die Lage?

Ohne Antwort setze ich den Zugang wieder auf öffentlich
silversurfer83 (2025-12-18 09:07:32+00:00): Hab passende Straßenbilder gefunden. Hat ein Tor am Abzweig der B 237 aufgestellt. Tor ist nun erfasst und Weg auf private.
hfs (2026-03-08 20:54:46+00:00): Hallo LaLinea,

das Hornstraßen-Center in Regensburg hat anscheinend seit 2025-06-05 wieder eröffnet?

https://www.tvaktuell.com/mediathek/video/regensburg-hornstrassen-center-ist-wieder-geoeffnet/
https://www.mittelbayerische.de/lokales/stadt-regensburg/ein-einkaufszentrum-fuer-den-stadtosten-18812225

Falls Du vor Ort bist, könntest Du hier einmal vorbei schauen? Vermutlich müssten dann die Geschäfte wieder reaktiviert werden.

Siehe auch https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5196842

Laut

https://www.netto-online.de/filialen/regensburg/hornstrasse-6/2834

soll es hier einen Netto-Markt geben. Vielleicht hat er den NORMA ersetzt?
Jerome Lacombe 3M (2025-05-26 13:43:23+00:00): Bonjour, le champ name est généralement utilisé pour les noms de voies (plaque de rues). Peut-être faudrait-il mattre "voie de bustram" dans un autre champ ...
fransuva (2025-06-06 10:26:33+00:00): It's not Vivadent
It's Viyadent Dental Clinic
NeisReview (2025-05-25 11:45:31+00:00): #vandalism
#fakedata
DD1GJ (2025-05-25 13:07:16+00:00): revert vandalism
HirschKauz (2025-05-25 14:50:38+00:00): nok: 1870-71,WW1
ok: 1870-1871; WW1
i.e. franco-prussian war and WW1
greets ;-)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166725697
RodrigoVi (2025-05-28 08:52:15+00:00): I had deleted the space in accordance with the wiki, but I hadn't seen the comma instead of the semicolon. On the other hand, for `franco-prussian war` it's neither `1870-71` nor `1870-1871` according to the https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:memorial:conflict the value is as corrected by limes11 `Franco-Prussian_War`

with Deepl
Das Leerzeichen hatte ich laut Wiki gelöscht, aber das Komma anstelle des Semikolons hatte ich nicht gesehen. Andererseits ist es für `franco-prussian war` weder `1870-71` noch `1870-1871` laut https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:memorial:conflict ist der Wert wie von limes11 korrigiert `Franco-Prussian_War`
HirschKauz (2025-05-28 09:45:05+00:00): :thumbup: ;-)
kartler175 (2025-05-29 12:44:09+00:00): Bitte keinen neuen Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1389362480#map=16/47.30225/8.38260 über bereits existierenden Wegen anlegen!
DD1GJ (2025-05-25 13:07:03+00:00): revert vandalism
dypa (2025-06-15 08:59:55+00:00): При указании размеченных не регулируемых пешеходных переходов нельзя использовать тег crossing=zebra, см https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:crossing=zebra

Пожалуйста при внесении следующих правок используйте теги (Размеченный (нерегулируемый) пешеходный переход)
crossing=uncontrolled
crossing:markings=zebra

Заранее спасибо!
ericrw_ (2025-09-09 06:03:45+00:00): I noticed that you've edited a number of trails with ford=stream. Per the [wiki](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ford?uselang=en), the `ford` tag should only be used on ways for the sections that actually cross a water polygon. This can affect map renderers that indicate the specific sections of highway=* ways that cross sections of water. 

For what you're trying to achieve, you should just mark the individual water crossing nodes with ford=yes, or in the case of a way crossing a riverbank, you can split the highway way and tag that with ford=yes. The entire highway=path should not have a ford=* tag unless it is submerged within water in its entirety.
ericrw_ (2025-09-09 06:10:56+00:00): To elaborate, ford=yes should be treated like bridge=yes or tunnel=yes. 

The entirety of a highway that features a bridge should not be tagged with bridge=yes, but rather the way should be broken into sections and only the section involving the bridge should feature bridge=yes. 

Same idea for ford=yes.
mertiHQ (2025-11-15 14:51:15+00:00): To jest hotel "Bliss Nada Beach Resort"
DD1GJ (2025-05-25 13:06:55+00:00): revert vandalism
Hufkratzer (2025-05-25 20:00:02+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1389475530 sieht mir eher nach einem Reitplatz aus, ähnlich wie z.B.  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/173457621 . Vgl. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE_talk:Tag:leisure=horse_riding#reitplatz_vs_reitanlage
Sandmann4u (2025-05-27 17:16:20+00:00): Ja, stimme ich dir zu. Wird in meinem nächsten Paket geändert.
eggie (2025-05-25 09:49:51+00:00): Op zich oke.... maar even ter Leering ende Vermaeck  en als voorbeeld.
Net als die vijver erboven hoort het gras niet op het water te liggen.
Ik heb het gescheiden.
Dat heet een multipolygoon.
Het gras is de outer  (landuse=grass staat op de relatie en niet op die lijn) en het water is de inner.
Stel dat het bos en water zou zijn. Dan zie je alles door elkaar.
Wat leesvoer voor de toekomst: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Multipolygon_Examples
gr eggie
Adrian Shobrooke (2025-10-11 16:38:09+00:00): Hi WT Hundu. While mapping some waterways, I noticed very small residential areas in a larger residential area here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1389490341/history#map=19/7.342733/9.705768 This is not usually correct.
Then I noticed that they appear to have the names of people living there. This does not follow the rules of OpenStreetMap, described here. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mapping_private_information.  The small residential area should probably be removed. However they could be replaced with individual rectangular or round buildings with building=yes, but no personal information. If you personally know they are houses, then use building=house. If you have any questions, just reply to this comment.
Regards,
Adrian
Metzor (2025-06-19 06:55:36+00:00): Hallo BoFaKon,

Ist das richtig so?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19172345/history#map=19/47.722869/9.070342&layers=N

https://brouter.de/brouter-web/#map=17/47.72300/9.07008/standard&lonlats=9.071274,47.72258;9.069633,47.723194&profile=car-eco

Darf man wirklich noch auf die Abfahrt fahren?

Gruß und happy mapping
Metzor
BoFaKon (2025-06-23 06:39:54+00:00): Hallo Metzor, sorry, ich war im Urlaub... :-)
Du hast völlig Recht, da war irrtümlich ein Abbiegeverbot hinein gerutscht, das es nicht gibt. Die B33 darf man natürlich einfach geradeaus in Richtung Singen weiter befahren. Und ja, die Abfahrt gibt es weiterhin, sie führt ins Gewerbegebiet. Aber sie ist keinesfalls als "Umfahrung" der B33 gedacht. 
Danke für den Hinweis! Schaust du nochmal mit deinen Tools, ob es jetzt besser aussieht?
Danke und viele Grüße
BoFaKon
Metzor (2025-06-24 04:28:19+00:00): Hallo und danke! Jetzt sehen die Routen gut aus. Ggf stehen noch Schilder, die folgendes verbieten:
https://brouter.de/brouter-web/#map=17/47.72307/9.06889/standard&lonlats=9.068417,47.723405;9.069544,47.72295&profile=car-eco

Schöne Grüße
Metzor
BoFaKon (2025-06-24 07:17:06+00:00): Da bin ich nicht sicher... Werde das nächste Mal drauf achten. 
Viele Grüße
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-07-28 14:35:30+00:00): dyskusja jest na https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/kategoria-drogi-przez-parking/133293
kmpoppe_repair (2025-05-25 15:40:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 166740727 where the changeset comment is: removing slur made of landuses
dpolovinkin (2025-05-28 21:03:19+00:00): обалдеть, а вас не смутило что у вас столько warnings в этом ченджсете?...

к слову, пишите пожалуйста что именно меняете в комментариях, оставлять такие как у вас нельзя, должно быть осмысленно, спасибо

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Good_changeset_comments
kmpoppe (2025-05-28 21:10:59+00:00): Hi dpolovinkin,

they wrote an insult against every OSM mapper using landuse areas, I guess they didn't care about the warnings they got from iD ;)

Have a good day!

K
dpolovinkin (2025-05-28 21:32:49+00:00): ah lol, didn't notice the block there. thanks, you too! :)
Stifi0815 (2025-09-22 08:42:46+00:00): Hallo stein_pilz,

Darf ich fragen, weshalb du die SAC Skala von T2 auf T3 erhöht hast? Ich bin den Weg schon länger nicht mehr gegangen, könnte mich aber an keine nennenswerten Schwierigkeiten erinnern.

Danke!
Stefan
Yog Sot (2025-05-25 20:25:17+00:00): ok, no dzięki xD
Czyli nie będzie tunelu, tylko przejazd, ale żenada lol. 
Przejazd na takim łuku. No nie ważne. 

I dzieki, wiesz, mi sie nie chce sięgac po te projekty kolejowe, więc dzięki, że tobie sie chce.
Anas masuris (2025-05-25 20:29:22+00:00): Nie doczekałem się pytania, więc się domyśliłem, o co chodzi xd

I proszsz - nie ma dużego grona osób, które zajmują się tematyką kolejową; większość to drogowcy
abdul_4ts (2025-05-31 17:53:30+00:00): Hello armahroseline, thanks for mapping.
please always square your buildings by selecting it and pressing Ctrl+Q (if you're using the iD web editor). you can also check out the OSM Wiki for more info on how to map or reach me.
DD1GJ (2025-05-25 13:06:45+00:00): revert vandalism
DD1GJ (2025-05-25 13:06:38+00:00): revert vandalism
DD1GJ (2025-05-25 13:06:30+00:00): revert vandalism
NeisBot (2025-05-25 11:16:35+00:00): Hi lf22music, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 96% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 4 highway(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=166729888
woodpeck (2025-05-25 18:43:02+00:00): Deletions look legit; spot check shows no traces of abandoned rail visible on aerial imagery
NeisReview (2025-05-26 06:13:07+00:00): Thank you for your private message and for confirming that the deletions were intentional.

However, may we know the reason behind removing several ways and paths which are still visible in the utilized satellite imagery? Please have a look here https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/53.202545/17.697923
lf22music (2025-05-26 08:31:35+00:00): its been a missclick i was using shortcut ctrl and backspece , i repair  it now its how it must been its alr rn