piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
cs09736 (2023-03-29 21:49:47+00:00): Cheers, should be fixed now. I don't think there's a need for the "parking" or "parking:side" prefix at all since they're all areas separate from the road
emersonveenstra (2023-03-29 10:33:11+00:00): Hi,

You created a route relation here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15657979 but you didn't specify the type of route. Please see the wiki and tag the route relation with a route tag: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Relation:route&uselang=en#Route_types_(route)

Thanks!
Mecheye (2023-03-30 17:12:04+00:00): Good catch, I forgot I did that. I'll remove that relation for now
pantufla (2023-03-29 19:58:06+00:00): Hola Wilmer, quizás sea buena idea dejar el alt_name? No lo sé, porque no sé cómo son los datos originales de confiables.
Wilmer Osario (2023-04-01 15:06:03+00:00): Hola, fue que un usuario (https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Rgarciagallo) que afirma vivir allí me contactó diciéndome que el verdadero nombre del poblado es "La Niebla" y que existe desde los años 80s.

Él afirma que el nombre de "El Encantado" que aparece en los mapas oficiales que usamos para mapear, era una hacienda que desapareció hace muchos años.

El mapa oficial más actualizado de la zona data de 1971 y puedes visualizar aquí:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Hoja_6747_-_LOS_TEQUES,_EL_JUNQUITO,_COLONIA_TOVAR,_CATIA_LA_MAR,_CARAYACA_-_DCN_1971.jpg
emersonveenstra (2023-03-29 10:28:15+00:00): Hi,

Can you please give a source for these new roads? I do not see them on any aerial imagery or on the county GIS website. Thanks!
Glassman (2023-03-30 22:49:01+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134242507
bxl-forever (2023-03-29 08:36:48+00:00): Hello,

If I look at the history of the object, I see this:

– It was tagged a town hall building; this is a historical building which is included in official inventories of remarkable buildings in this part of the country.
– (version #6) A newbie added a picnic table and put the information on the building itself.
– Instead of removing that mistake, you removed references to the town hall and made this huge heritage building… a picnic shelter.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/223512708/history

Would you please have a second look, this looks weird.
Glassman (2023-03-30 22:50:30+00:00): #TIP: The address should be added in segments, addr:housenumber, addr:street: addr:unit. Can you update the address tags?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134242704
Glassman (2023-03-30 22:50:57+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134242830
GOwin (2023-06-16 08:05:13+00:00): Hi @EngrBlessing199x
These features you added don't appear on current imagery. Are they based on proposed features, and copied from a subdivision plan? Can you please elaborate.
Claudius Henrichs (2023-03-29 08:01:43+00:00): Hi,
I cannot find any information about the opening of Chongqing Rail Transit Line 10 to Nanping (南坪). 
Can you confirm this section is already operational?
MoistTangerine2 (2023-03-29 08:26:14+00:00): Sorry, the Nanping station hasn't opened yet. I just marked the location of the subway station.
Claudius Henrichs (2023-03-31 07:38:26+00:00): Thanks for clarifying. I've updated Line 10 route relations accordingly
ig4map (2023-04-02 07:06:25+00:00): Как называется место на самом деле? Тут почти все кафешки отличные и не дорогие. В теге name указывают реальное название места
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-03-29 03:52:04+00:00): 134237538 134193131 134192923 134192699 134157880
kartler175 (2023-03-29 09:21:41+00:00): Ist die Datenlizenz für die Verwendung in OSM inzwischen geklärt? Siehe https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/datenlizenz-deutschland-rheinland-pfalz/74775

Davon abgesehen boundary=protected_area => Relation type=boundary

Rollen überprüfen!
pd8JUHyoPJ (2023-03-30 05:35:32+00:00): Danke für die Hinweise - type und Rollen sind geändert. Es wurde kein Datensatz von Geodaten der Vermessungs- und Katasterverwaltung Rheinland-Pfalz oder der Naturschutzverwaltung Rheinland-Pfalz heruntergeladen und in OSM verwendet. Um Missverständnisse zu vermeiden, habe ich "source:geometry=Geoportal der Naturschutzverwaltung RLP - Kartendienst LANIS" entfernt - das war eher informativ gedacht.
mavl (2023-04-25 09:02:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-03-29 04:20:27+00:00): 134210294 134170470 134130660 133927655 133845372 133650480 133614402 133161882 133157818 133118663 133115800 133078209 133075572 133072438 133030878 132819141 132782266 132777588 132737852 132736585 132736576 132571419 132524961 132523845
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-03-29 04:20:33+00:00): 134210294 134170470 134130660 133927655 133845372 133650480 133614402 133161882 133157818 133118663 133115800 133078209 133075572 133072438 133030878 132819141 132782266 132777588 132737852 132736585 132736576 132571419 132524961 132523845
cartofy (2023-03-29 08:18:49+00:00): Hello! Please try and limit your changesets to smaller areas. Your edits seem to be in Africa and Bangladesh within the same changeset, which causes issues when trying to review what exactly has been changed. Also, please make your changeset comments a bit more descriptive about what you modified in the highway network - did you change classification, changed shape, connectivity, etc.
DesMoinesRiver (2023-03-30 09:29:41+00:00): Hello cartofy, thank you for reaching out. I agree that this changeset boundary is much larger than it should be. It is my intention to keep changesets to a localized area, and I will continue to be cautious of this moving forward. I also appreciate your tips on changeset comments; I will keep that in mind.
kortgodt (2023-03-29 10:26:04+00:00): Er du sikker på broen er åbnet?
osmviborg (2023-03-29 20:22:55+00:00): access:conditional=no @ (2023 Jan 18-2023 Apr 19)
user_5359 (2023-03-31 11:59:45+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1158085081. What is the meaning of the tag batiment public = DD_MINADER ?
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-03-29 04:55:54+00:00): 134213095 134165805 133928317 133845573 133651097 133619445 133165018 133161155 133118981 133117367 133079454 133075190 133071770 133032550 132823667 132783264 132776904 132570512 132525308
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-03-29 04:55:47+00:00): 134213095 134165805 133928317 133845573 133651097 133619445 133165018 133161155 133118981 133117367 133079454 133075190 133071770 133032550 132823667 132783264 132776904 132570512 132525308
mavl (2023-04-25 09:01:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-03-29 05:03:04+00:00): 134214034 134165026 133929168 133845761 133655582 133618968 133164407 133160421 133119861 133117673 133077467 133073830 133070808 132822219 132780125 132774219 132621628 132573989
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-03-29 05:02:56+00:00): 134214034 134165026 133929168 133845761 133655582 133618968 133164407 133160421 133119861 133117673 133077467 133073830 133070808 132822219 132780125 132774219 132621628 132573989
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-03-29 05:23:31+00:00): 134213000 134207541 134166768 134131146 133928127 133845475 133650712 133159353 133118860 133116823 133078353 133075351 133072251 133031037 132782852 132777875 132736650 132621270 132569529 132524624 132524486
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-03-29 05:50:29+00:00): 134214636 134169924 134164581 133887048 133883337 133655343 133618756 133163338 133160221 133121263 133117993 133113681 133079746 133077379 133074470 133071508 133033081 132779782 132779425 132774177 132571131 132526694 129957729 129226682 129226550
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-03-29 05:50:21+00:00): 134214636 134169924 134164581 133887048 133883337 133655343 133618756 133163338 133160221 133121263 133117993 133113681 133079746 133077379 133074470 133071508 133033081 132779782 132779425 132774177 132571131 132526694 129957729 129226682 129226550
Johnwhelan (2024-02-03 14:40:57+00:00): The imagery doesn't support a grid residential.
KachhiCanal (2024-02-07 04:37:22+00:00): Hello Johnwhelan. The roads were added using Maxar Premium Imagery which is no longer available. However, these roads are still aligned with Esri World Imagery.
Johnwhelan (2024-02-07 14:19:49+00:00): Both Esri and Bing appear to show buildings where the highway=residential are and do not appear to show a grid for the highways.  Perhaps you could check.  

I have noticed a number of settlements in Sudan that have a grid of highway=residential optimistically imposed on them. 

Just a comment.

Cheerio John
KachhiCanal (2024-02-09 00:50:42+00:00): Thanks for the feedback John. What do you think would be the best course of action here?
Johnwhelan (2024-02-09 00:55:15+00:00): It's a toss up between zapping them and leaving them.  I'd be inclined to zap them otherwise someone else might follow your example especially one of the paid mappers.  Either way it's not life threatening.

John
KachhiCanal (2024-02-12 09:20:55+00:00): I've gone ahead and removed the residential roads and will keep your feedback in mind going forward. Happy mapping!
Johnwhelan (2024-02-12 14:35:29+00:00): Thank you.

Happy Mapping to you as well.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-03-29 08:15:32+00:00): use building=yes
Devdatta (2023-03-29 07:19:22+00:00): Hi! Welcome to OSM!

What source did you use for this edit? I could not find the stream in any of the satellite Basemaps that are available.

Additionally, you are using a #HKM tag. What does this stand for ?
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-03-29 17:52:12+00:00): Hi, you probably wanted to use 
building=roof
Kayo_33 (2023-08-31 12:24:13+00:00): Indeed! Thanks for pointing out!
Diacritic (2023-03-29 09:07:43+00:00): Hi Boulton,

These estates and neighbourhoods are not suburbs, and shouldn't be mapped as such. They can be mapped as place=neighbourhood or on a landuse=residential as an estate name
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2023-03-29 09:31:30+00:00): hey
Why did you revert my edits?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/134245195
even though they were correct and I did not import them, and they were based on pre-existing points and notes sent through the Saudi Telegram community!
https://t.me/OSMSaudi/1/6687

If there are other users who have made an import, my edits are not included in these imports.

You can see that I deleted the imported ways:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1155960076/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1155960082/history

The watercourse was drawn according to satellite images, and the name is taken from the user’s note via Telegram and also from the previously added point here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8513034898/history

Please, before restoring any edits, ensure that this does not affect other edits, or revert it to the DWG.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-03-29 10:18:58+00:00): Your changes were reverted with the import because it was impossible to revert otherwise since you modified the imported data. 

I also assumed you may be working with the offending users because of the timing of your edits. I apologize because that appears to be an incorrect assumption.

 Do you have any insight on the users performing the import? 

They appear to be 1 person using multiple accounts.
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2023-03-29 10:38:27+00:00): Changes can be recovered without harming other modifications, and this is what DWG members do, and as I mentioned to you earlier that I have nothing to do with other users who import, and I made my modifications and my source was a note received on Telegram from a user of osmand (navigation application), then I noticed that There is a user who puts tags on the ways and all the nodes that follow him, and this is a wrong practice, and I changed it in:
134245346 134245384 134245613 134245631 134245786
I did not notice that this user is importing or I notice other users, so I ask you not to throw accusations on others without facts based on them
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-03-29 10:42:21+00:00): For the wrong assumption I apologize. I will try to reinstate your edits.
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2023-03-29 10:48:35+00:00): Thank you. Don't do that. I'll make the changes again
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2023-03-29 11:04:39+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/134257743
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-03-29 11:07:21+00:00): thank you
tux67 (2023-03-29 08:46:35+00:00): Hi, kleiner Hinweis .. da du das tagging hier ja remote änderst - in NRW sollten die NRW DOPs das - halbwegs - aktuellere Hintergrundbild sein. Nur für den Fall das da inzwischen ein Haus steht ..  (manchmal auch Maxar - an der Grenze zu den Niederlanden PDOK).
Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134247679
geozeisig (2023-03-29 10:18:33+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. Ich denke, ich bin mit dem Thema aber durch.

Gruß Geozeisig
Devdatta (2023-03-29 07:15:38+00:00): Hi! 
Welcome to OSM! 
Great job at editing and adding new features that you know.

Happy mapping!
Kai Johnson (2023-07-02 01:21:28+00:00): I see that some of the sections of Steel Pass Road have been deleted. I know things got washed out pretty good last year (saw it myself) but recent reports are that the route has been reestablished. Did you have plans to restore those sections?
Adam Schneider (2023-07-02 01:35:32+00:00): I just checked the Strava heatmap, and it looks like people are using one of the flood channels as the new "road."  I traced the new route from Strava imagery and added it as an unnamed track with motor_vehicle=yes but motorcar=no.
Kai Johnson (2023-07-03 15:29:08+00:00): Nicely done! It's good to have the connectivity back. I plan to be out there when it gets a little cooler and will have an opportunity to survey current conditions.
Josef73 (2023-05-27 19:36:45+00:00): Hello, can you the values of the tag opening_hours. Please check the wiki-site at: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours for the right syntax. Thanks.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-03-29 08:00:25+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2607363419
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2607363418
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/345686973
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/345686974
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/345686981
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/345686982
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/344859881
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/344859882

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o miejscowości.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1772971328

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
GOwin (2023-03-29 10:51:57+00:00): Thank you for helping improve the map, and welcome to OSM.
kagebar (2023-03-29 11:47:25+00:00): навіщо ви приклеюєте полігони до доріг? дорога не має нульову ширину. а якщо ліс вирубають чи поле заросте, ви будете кожну дорогу відклеювати щоб переробити?
user_3961131 (2023-03-29 11:52:53+00:00): вітаю. дякую за коментар-пораду, я в подальшому перегляну і відкоригую це.
jcr83 (2023-03-30 07:06:16+00:00): Hi,
The name you added is not written correctly (2 errors)
It should be "Puy de Dôme".
Moreover, this name is the name of a mountain, it is strange to see the same name on a parking.
eggie (2023-03-29 08:52:06+00:00): Dag MvdHorst.. Best lastig in het begin.
Hier zie ik dupliaceted ways. Dus wegen die op elkaar lopen.
Dat zal dus aangepast moeten worden.
Je Guldenpad loopt op de Daalderstraat. 
Veredr gebruiken we highway=path als er geen bord staat en highway=footway bij een wandelpad met een G7 bord.
Ook loopt woonerf Meijersloot te ver door. 
Kijk je nog even?
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=134251705

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-03-29 09:43:39+00:00): Opgeplakte wegen verwijderd.
Groet
eggie
NorthCrab_upload (2023-03-29 08:40:27+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9861052952
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10770403345

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Rosy":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9861052977
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9861052978
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9861052979
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9861052980
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10770411611

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
gendy54 (2023-07-29 13:32:21+00:00): Bonjour,

Merci de jeter un œil sur les bonnes pratiques notamment sur le commentaire de changeset: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#Faites_de_bons_commentaires_de_groupe_de_modifications

Sur tous les changeset, je ne vois que: "Ajout"
NorthCrab_upload (2023-03-29 08:50:31+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/373717262

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2023-03-29 09:00:24+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10770387999

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
wielandb (2023-08-06 14:46:00+00:00): Hey :)

Wieso hast du die Zugangsbeschränkungen für https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4681391 so gesetzt, wie du es getan hast? :o Ich hatte die Zugangsbeschränkungen schon so gesetzt, wie sie eigentlich richtig sind, und jetzt sind die mMn... naja nicht falsch, aber "weniger korrekt" als vorher.
wielandb (2023-08-06 14:47:50+00:00): Ich muss mich korrigieren. bicycle=yes ist auf jeden Fall nicht richtig, wenn die Beschilderung so ist, wie sie in den Tags steht.
SvenQ (2023-08-06 15:14:58+00:00): Bezüglich deiner Frage zu vehicle vs. access gebe ich dir recht. Das war in deiner Variante korrekter. 

Deinen Einwand bezüglich des bicylce-Keys verstehe ich aber nicht. Zusatztafel 1020-12 steht für Anlieger und Fahrradfahrer frei. Auf dem Fahrrad und zu Fuß darf die Straße immer genutzt werden, mit anderen Fahrzeugen aber nur, wenn man Anlieger ist. Wieso soll bicycle=yes also hier falsch sein?
wielandb (2023-08-06 16:47:17+00:00): Oh entschuldige. :o Ich bin gerade mal vorbei gegangen. Ich hatte gedacht, dort steht die Zusatztafel 1020-30. 🙈
Aber so ist natürlich bicycle=yes richtig. 

Ich würde aber access wieder zu vehicle zurückändern, wenn das ok für dich ist.
SvenQ (2023-08-06 18:23:09+00:00): Klar, so ist das ja wie gesagt besser. Bei der Gelegenheit kannst du auch gleich noch das foot=yes löschen, denn dass ist durch dass vehicle=destination ja überflüssig (da Fußgänger != Fahrzeug).
pitfire (2023-03-31 05:52:58+00:00): Hi puia,

zum Datensatz "Specify building types ".
building=terrace beschreibt eine geschlossene Fläche mehrere Reienhäuser:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:building=terrace?uselang=de
In diesen Fällen ist  die detaillierte Alternative, jedes Haus einzeln mit building=house zu mappen. 
PS:-) wäre toll, wenn Du die fehlenden Adressdaten noch nacherfassen kannst.

Gruß
puia (2023-03-31 06:00:42+00:00): Hallo pitfire, danke für den Hinweis. Ich mappe immer, wenn ich gerade im Dorf unterwegs bin. Werde mir beim nächsten Spaziergang mal die Stichstraßen vornehmen. Gruß
puia (2023-03-31 06:05:16+00:00): Sorry, nochmal eine Frage. Wenn ich das richtig verstehe, ist es im ersten Schritt ersteinmal besser den Tag building=house auch für Reihenhäuser etc. zu nutzen? Wenn ich unterwegs bin, nutze ich meist die App StreetComplete nach besten Wissen und Gewissen. Ich schaue mir das da nochmal an. Danke
zorglubu (2023-03-31 21:08:13+00:00): Bonjour,

Merci d'avoir enrichi la carte.

Notez qu'une maison sur Openstreetmap ne peut pas être marquée "chez xxx". Sauf si c'est un restaurant ou quelque chose du même genre dont c'est le vrai nom.
Merci de ne pas mettre d'informations personnelles.
;-)
zorglubu (2023-03-31 20:42:25+00:00): Bonjour, et bienvenue sur Openstreetmap.

Merci d'avoir repositionné cette adresse.
Vous avez supprimé toutes les étiquettes du nœud existant en le laissant (vide) dans OSM, il aurait été préférable de simplement le déplacer.
Mais pas de souci, continuez à contribuer ! Merci encore :-)
Gonéo (2023-03-29 10:16:55+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenu parmi les contributeurs OpenStreetMap.

Suite à votre demande de relecture :

Le tag access=private est générique et concerne tous les modes de transport (piéton, voiture et autres) et il n'est pas nécessaire d'ajouter les tags plus spécifiques dans ce cas.

Il est également possible d'ajouter les portails en plaçant un nœud sur le chemin à l'endroit du portail.
Kovoschiz (2023-06-03 08:05:24+00:00): Will there be no island for the mid-block crosswalk in the future?
zorglubu (2023-03-31 20:16:26+00:00): Bonjour,
Bienvenue sur Openstreetmap,

Qu'entendez-vous par une amenity=place_of_worship + building=yes qui est un étang ?
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2023-03-29 09:36:50+00:00): جزاك الله خيرا
aduxas (2024-12-17 22:48:11+00:00): The sign at the entrance says NO TRESPASSING.  No exceptions.  It is not because it "looks walker friendly" that the sign is open for interpretation.  It looks bike friendly too, and I did ride my bike there.  Yet, you only changed pedestrian access.  Why?
Jose Luis Infante (2023-03-29 14:44:24+00:00): Gracias por tu edición, aunque los edificios del Centro de Juventud anteriores estaban importados de los datos de Catastro, mientras que ahora los edificios parecen que se han dibujado a ojo mediante la imagen de PNOA, con lo que se ha perdido precisión.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134254125
Johnwhelan (2023-09-01 00:43:56+00:00): you appear to be remapping existing buildings so the buildings are duplicated.  Please don't.

Thanks John
highflyer74 (2023-03-29 14:05:24+00:00): Moin Henning und willkommen bei OSM!

Ich bin mir nicht ganz sicher, aber habe den Eindruck, dass ein paar dieser Gebäude keine freistehenden Einfamilienhäuser sind, weil da Praxen drin sind und Kundenparkplätze davor.

Kannst du dich noch erinnern?

Viele Grüße!
HenningOnline (2023-03-30 18:22:05+00:00): Hi, tolles Projekt, da helfe ich gerne mit.
In der 1a ist tatsächlich eine Arztpraxis. Da habe ich keine Option für in Street Complete gefunden. Was kann man da machen?
In Hausnummer 1 war vorher ein Zahnarzt davor ein Hausarzt. Jetzt ist da keine Praxis mehr und es steht zum Verkauf.
Viele Grüße!
Henning