piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ManuelsWorld (2023-07-24 15:38:10+00:00): Hello,
No I was not. I looked at several sources and in a statement by the federal council it stated, that the Vmax of the GBT is 250 km/h.
https://www.parlament.ch/de/ratsbetrieb/suche-curia-vista/geschaeft?AffairId=20183571#:~:text=Zur%20Sicherung%20der%20Betriebsstabilit%C3%A4t%20und%20P%C3%BCnktlichkeit%20ist%20es%20jedoch%20m%C3%B6glich%2C%20dass%20einzelne%20Z%C3%BCge%20im%20Gotthard%2DBasistunnel%20schneller%20verkehren.%20Grunds%C3%A4tzlich%20gilt%2C%20dass%20Geschwindigkeiten%20bis%20zu%20250%20Stundenkilometern%20f%C3%BCr%20das%20Aufholen%20von%20Versp%C3%A4tungen%20nutzbar%20sein%20sollen.

I did some additional research and think it should be at least 230 km/h as described in the network statement of the gotthard base tunnel (page 7, [2.6.2]):
https://vorgaben.sbb.ch/_file/12684/anhang-gotthard-v2-1-09-12-2022-d.pdf
emersonveenstra (2023-05-27 18:50:35+00:00): Hi,

You created https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1176283214 with no tags, could you please go back and add tags to it? Thanks!
emersonveenstra (2023-05-27 18:51:04+00:00): Hi,

You created https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1176283591 with no tags on it. Could you please go back and add tags? Thanks!
MxxCon (2023-05-26 18:03:23+00:00): Hello.
Could you please elaborate what are you trying to map here? Is this road blocked or closed or what? Why did you add barrier here?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136589155
deepikja (2023-06-01 07:41:58+00:00): Hello,

Thank you for reviewing the changeset and highlighting the issue. Apologies for the delay in the response to your comment as the editor is on leave. 
In this changeset the editor has added the barrier based on the Bing street side overlay https://www.bing.com/maps?cp=40.691527%7E-73.969507&lvl=17.0&v=2&sV=1&mo=om.1&pi=-16&style=x&dir=79.9. However, the editor missed on checking the vintage. Apologies for the incorrect edit due to the incomplete check done by the editor.
I have reverted the edit in the changeset #136817619 based on the latest aerial imagery and will take this as a learning to be cautious and provide feedback to the editor to use the latest resources while making any editing on OSM.

Regards,
Deepikja
SafetyIng (2024-07-01 19:03:34+00:00): Hey, z.B. bei 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/142570933/history und https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1298054876/history 

Hätte ich 2 Anmerkungen: 
1. Wieso teilst du die Straße hier auf? Die Livingstreet fängt schon an der Kreuzung an, nicht erst wo das Schild steht (gibt dazu entsprechende Rechtssprechung, dass bei solchen Zonen das Schild so stehen muss, dass es aus allen Richtungen kommend vernünftig gesehen werden kann)

2. Du verwendest als Oberfläche immer cobblestones / unhewn_cobblestones
Aber der Key ist cobblestone (ohne das s(!))...
tvbrene (2024-07-01 22:07:17+00:00): Zu 1.: Da würde ich dann um ein entsprechendes Urteil bitten, das aussagt, dass VZ 325.1 eine Ausnahme der Grundregel darstellt. Meiner Kenntnis nach gelten sämtliche Schilder immer ab dem Schild. Bei verkehrsberuhigten Bereichen gibt es Urteile zur Fortwirkung der Vorfahrt, wegen der Vorfahrtsregel nach § 10 StVO, bei der Ausfahrt aus diesen von bis zu 30 m nach dem Schild und selbst bei dieser Regelung gibt es Abweichungen, wenn z.B. direkt nach dem Aufhebungsschild ein 30-Zonen-Schild steht, gilt diese Nachwirkung nicht mehr.

Zu 2.: Danke für den Hinweis, habe die Vorlage entsprechend angepasst.
felipeeugenio (2023-05-26 17:16:36+00:00): Estimado
Gracias por las ediciones, pero por favor revisar si lo que está agregando ya está agregado. AHora me tiene eliminando duplicados.
Además en algunos casos el colegio está a varios metros de donde lo está agregando. por favor cuidado con eso.
saludos
1998alexkane (2023-06-23 15:45:01+00:00): It appears that now the cycleways here are now mapped twice: Once as tags on the roads, and once as highway=cycleway ways. Probably it makes sense to map some as separate ways (around the Washington & Clark/Dearborn bus stop for example), while others make much more sense as tags (sharrows as Washington & State, painted line on Michigan)
nickvet419 (2023-06-23 22:32:36+00:00): most of the bike lanes downtown are being converted to separated lanes. ive noticed a lot of work needs done on bikemap around chicago
1998alexkane (2023-06-24 13:57:30+00:00): What mostly needs work in your opinion?
Andy_Morgan (2023-05-28 14:25:08+00:00): Зачем удаляете велодорожку на Фонтанке?
mini-me (2023-05-28 14:56:40+00:00): Затем, что она уже отмечена. И я вам об этом написал https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136549305
Adam Franco (2023-11-26 01:58:01+00:00): It is not appropriate to set the place=* value based on the incorporation status of municipalities. In OSM the place=* tag should have a value that is based on the size, amenities, and importance of the community, not it's incorporation status. In New England, the basic unit of municipal incorporation is called a "Town", but this doesn't mean that such a municipality demands a "place=town". 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:place#Populated_settlements,_urban_and_rural

Please follow up with the New England mapping community in the thread at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/new-england-place-name-inflation/103878/12
Adam Franco (2023-11-26 01:57:56+00:00): It is not appropriate to set the place=* value based on the incorporation status of municipalities. In OSM the place=* tag should have a value that is based on the size, amenities, and importance of the community, not it's incorporation status. In New England, the basic unit of municipal incorporation is called a "Town", but this doesn't mean that such a municipality demands a "place=town". 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:place#Populated_settlements,_urban_and_rural

Please follow up with the New England mapping community in the thread at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/new-england-place-name-inflation/103878/12
Adam Franco (2023-11-26 20:09:40+00:00): This invalid place-level retagging has been reverted. See community discussion at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/new-england-place-name-inflation/103878/21

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144484196
mikko_tamura (2023-05-26 15:14:49+00:00): Hi Cas the tags you are using is not being used for this project. Please use the designated tags that can be found in the instructions
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136590254
Hager_M (2023-05-28 08:38:42+00:00): Hello,Anjli_sharma;
I see you added "layer=3" for some streets and it's not suitable to add this tag in those streets for fixing this issue you need to move the building away from the street to avoid the intersection and removed this tag.
Link for streets:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/597321411
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/597321410
For more information on how to use this tag.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer
Could you check this issue and fix it, please?
Regards
Hager_M
wambacher (2023-05-27 22:44:18+00:00): Hi, du solltest etwas vorsichtiger bei der Adressenvergabe sein. Wir mussten heute am Tegernsee 19 falsche Adressen korrigieren.

siehe:  https://wambachers-osm.website/data/seetroll_tegernsee.png
eggie (2023-08-16 20:00:30+00:00): Hoi A67 A67

Kan dit veer weer open..? 
Vanaf 14 aug zou het weer varen. 
Zie https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139980156#map=15/51.9123/4.2497&layers=N

Mapper heeft plannen om het veer te verwijderen, maar is duidelijk niet op de hoogte. Ook (nog) geen reactie gekregen. 

MVG
eggie
spughetti (2023-05-26 14:38:24+00:00): Source:
https://data.sfgov.org/Culture-and-Recreation/StreetSmArts-Murals/wg8w-68vc
eggie (2023-05-26 15:15:02+00:00): Je bedoeling is natuurlijk goed, maar geen beschrijvingen met de name=....  tag in OSM.
Dit is hetzelfde als name=huis namen=straat name= bankje
Dat is niet de bedoeling in OSM en vervuilkt de kaart.

MVG
eggie
user_5359 (2023-05-27 06:37:29+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful when editing the map data. You moved the node over 100 meters, please check the position.
user_5359 (2023-05-27 06:36:21+00:00): Welcome to OSM! 
Please be careful when editing the map data. You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/162302431/history over 100 meters, so there were problems with the corresponding way. I have moved the point back to its original position.
user_5359 (2023-05-27 06:27:44+00:00): Welcoem to OSM! Please learn the difference between name and description. The house is marked with the key building not with the name=House.
CurlingMan13 (2023-07-08 03:22:04+00:00): This shouldn't have been created since it is clearly done "just for the renderer".  I believe this has been mentioned before...

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1176294681
MisturJoesturr (2024-03-17 19:43:05+00:00): Şu alanları yola yapıştırmayın lütfen. Kaldırım vs çizerken baştan çizmem gerekiyor.
felipeeugenio (2023-05-26 17:26:24+00:00): Estimado
Borró todos los edificios que habían. Por favor no hacer eso. Hay gente que se esfuerza para egragar edificios. Los que borró estaban bien dibujados.

otra cosa, por favor cuidar los tildes y la ortografía en general.

si un colegio no tiene npumero, agregar nohousenumber=yes, no un SN.

si una  colegio tiene como numeración un kilómetro, por favor agregar addr:milestone=XX. Sin el Km. Solo el número.

saludos
eggie (2023-05-26 15:34:49+00:00): Welkom bij OSM  Is hier werkelijk een camping met de naam 	beek gemeente montferland?
Er is hier al een camping gemapt met de naam 't Peeske.
Camping name=beek gemeente montferland heb ik verwijderd.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-05-26 15:36:16+00:00): I remove the campsite with name='beek gemeente montferland'.. No campsite with this name. 
Greetz,
eggie
felipeeugenio (2023-05-26 17:13:50+00:00): Hola
15,458? ahí va la coma?

en todo caso es highway=milestone y distance y el numero separado por puntos. La unidad es el kilómetro, por lo que no hace falta agregarlo.
saludos
Giannina Schafer (2023-05-29 15:32:10+00:00): Hola
Creo que el problema que tengo es que el kilometraje no lo puedo visualizar en mapillary, lo estoy tratando de editar de alguna manera que me quede el marcador y la etiqueta visible en la app, pero no resulta, puede ser un problema de etiquetado así como me explicaba?
felipeeugenio (2023-05-29 15:51:55+00:00): Hola
Desconocemos los filtros que hace Mapillary, pero lo que no hacemos en OSM es mapear para que las cosas se vean en una app. Mapeamos solo con los tags correctos.
Si las app luego quieren mostrar las cosas o no ya es un tema que escapa a nuestras posibilidades.

Por lo pronto le pedimos indicarnos si la coma va ahí, ya que es dudoso que estemos hablando de miles de kilometros en un camino tan pequeño.
saludos
Giannina Schafer (2023-05-29 16:03:45+00:00): Hola
Entiendo perfectamente, y sí, la coma va ahí, 15,458. Si se ingresa de esta manera, cambiaré los demás. Muchas gracias.
Saludos.
silversurfer83 (2023-05-27 06:36:55+00:00): Hi :)

die Eigenschaften des Weges sehen ganz gut aus. Nur das westliche Ende ist dir, statt an die Wietersheimer Str., an die Ecke des Feldes geraten.
Das ist ein kleines Problem des Editors, den du benutzt. Diese Software versucht immer Objekte, die bewegt oder erzeugt werden, mit anderen sehr nahen Objekten zu verbinden. Hier war vermutlich das Feld näher als der Weg und dann schnappte der Weg halt dort hin.
Ich hab das mal korrigiert https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=136612098

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136593795
ivanbranco (2023-05-26 16:15:53+00:00): Ciao dixco87,

grazie per i contributi. Se riesci potresti aggiungere commenti ai changeset che aiutino gli altri a capire cosa hai modificato? "v" non è di grande aiuto, vedi: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Good_changeset_comments

buon mapping
dixco87 (2023-05-29 07:20:06+00:00): Grazie Ivanbranco. non ero a conoscenza dell'utilità.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-06-04 11:42:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 136929482 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some fantasy mapping in Greece.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7170
Enock4seth (2023-06-30 08:49:01+00:00): This is bad, be careful when mapping not to accidentally move existing features to some random position like you have done here.
Adam Franco (2023-11-26 02:03:35+00:00): Glastonbury has a population of 9. It is not a place=town, but rather a place=hamlet.
zorglubu (2023-06-17 17:08:07+00:00): Bonjour BLuek@ro,
Tu as ajouté de nombreux parkings dans ce coin, et c'est une bonne idée, mais cela mériterait d'être affiné.
* les places individuelles (pour une voiture donc) doivent avoir l'attribut amenity=parking_space, avec si besoin parking_space=disabled mais en général rien d'autre. 
(cf. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:amenity=parking_space)
* l'attribut capacity=N sera utilisé si on dessine un parking concernant N voitures. On peut alors dessiner un rectangle allongé et ajouter "street_side" (voir détails ici : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:parking%3Dstreet_side)
* les entrées de parking sont repérées ainsi : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:amenity%3Dparking_entrance

Enfin, je te remercie de bien vouloir ajouter des commentaires (style "ajout parkings") dans les groupes de modification, c'est sympa pour les autres contributeurs qui sont sur la même zone.
Merci et bonne continuation :-)
Adam Franco (2023-11-26 01:57:38+00:00): It is not appropriate to set the place=* value based on the incorporation status of municipalities. In OSM the place=* tag should have a value that is based on the size, amenities, and importance of the community, not it's incorporation status. In New England, the basic unit of municipal incorporation is called a "Town", but this doesn't mean that such a municipality demands a "place=town". 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:place#Populated_settlements,_urban_and_rural

Please follow up with the New England mapping community in the thread at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/new-england-place-name-inflation/103878/12
Adam Franco (2023-11-26 19:16:13+00:00): This actual change-set of adding two hamlets is OK. The previous comment was intended for your other mass-changes to places across the state.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136595517
Adam Franco (2023-11-26 01:57:30+00:00): It is not appropriate to set the place=* value based on the incorporation status of municipalities. In OSM the place=* tag should have a value that is based on the size, amenities, and importance of the community, not it's incorporation status. In New England, the basic unit of municipal incorporation is called a "Town", but this doesn't mean that such a municipality demands a "place=town". 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:place#Populated_settlements,_urban_and_rural

Please follow up with the New England mapping community in the thread at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/new-england-place-name-inflation/103878/12
Adam Franco (2023-11-26 01:57:24+00:00): It is not appropriate to set the place=* value based on the incorporation status of municipalities. In OSM the place=* tag should have a value that is based on the size, amenities, and importance of the community, not it's incorporation status. In New England, the basic unit of municipal incorporation is called a "Town", but this doesn't mean that such a municipality demands a "place=town". 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:place#Populated_settlements,_urban_and_rural

Please follow up with the New England mapping community in the thread at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/new-england-place-name-inflation/103878/12
Andrea Musuruane (2023-05-27 08:55:36+00:00): Can you please avoid splitting ways connecting to roundabout if the are not physically separated? https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=846147750110547 I'm gonna revert this. BR, Andrea
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136596002
Anton_Klebanovich (2023-05-27 15:52:29+00:00): Hello! Thanks for your feedback, I'll take that into account in the future.

Ciao! Grazie per il tuo feedback, ne terrò conto in futuro.
Kovoschiz (2023-05-27 09:52:46+00:00): Would be better to put KMB's long names with the location prefix in `official_name=` (reserving `short_name=`  for estate names and such) , as  `name=` is the common name. As a side benefit, renderers and applications can group the same name stop from Citybus using  the same `name=`.
Kovoschiz (2023-05-27 09:53:56+00:00): (although you have already made a `=stop_area`)
Patrickov (2023-05-27 15:59:57+00:00): I am unsure about how close we should follow the official stop names.

The simplest way is to follow whatever shown on the bus stop post (I believe mapping means putting something actually sitting there on the map).  However this leads to awkward situations where companies give different stop names at the same location (it's even more complicated when we take in minibus stops -- most of them don't have names at all).  Chung Wui Street is not the worst case already.  At Ma Tau Wai Estate (at the north end of Ma Tau Wai Road and the subsequent section of Ma Tau Chung Road), Citybus effectively treats the northbound stops as one group but KMB names them in two.  *That's* really tedious.

And of course I am, like many others, disgusted by the recent "Interchange" stuff introduced by KMB.  On a more "practical" note, I believe it would go sooner or later.
Patrickov (2023-05-27 16:00:45+00:00): `stop_area` is, as you noticed, a compromise as a result of the above problems.  But arguably I am mapping for the renderer here -- I found one of the (unintended) results is that routes look better on OSMTransportViewer.

Meanwhile, I found `stop_area` primiarily as a way to group stops described in the same hkbus Fandom page, and I found kicking the `ref:hkbus=*` tag to the relation improves the structure (to me).  That said, I do not intend to treat the hkbus Fandom as 100% accurate.
jansokoly (2025-09-13 11:29:31+00:00): Tu sa o ziadnu duplicitu nejedna. Tie studnicky su tam 2, s roznymi nazvami, z roznych obdobi. Stacilo si pozriet fotografie z miesta. Ziadam o vratenie do povodneho stavu.
Adam Franco (2023-11-26 01:57:22+00:00): It is not appropriate to set the place=* value based on the incorporation status of municipalities. In OSM the place=* tag should have a value that is based on the size, amenities, and importance of the community, not it's incorporation status. In New England, the basic unit of municipal incorporation is called a "Town", but this doesn't mean that such a municipality demands a "place=town". 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:place#Populated_settlements,_urban_and_rural

Please follow up with the New England mapping community in the thread at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/new-england-place-name-inflation/103878/12
Adam Franco (2023-11-26 01:57:18+00:00): It is not appropriate to set the place=* value based on the incorporation status of municipalities. In OSM the place=* tag should have a value that is based on the size, amenities, and importance of the community, not it's incorporation status. In New England, the basic unit of municipal incorporation is called a "Town", but this doesn't mean that such a municipality demands a "place=town". 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:place#Populated_settlements,_urban_and_rural

Please follow up with the New England mapping community in the thread at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/new-england-place-name-inflation/103878/12
Adam Franco (2023-11-26 20:09:41+00:00): This invalid place-level retagging has been reverted. See community discussion at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/new-england-place-name-inflation/103878/21

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144484196
AWMapper (2023-07-05 14:07:11+00:00): Hello, thanks for adding the smoothness and tracktype tags. 

I was wondering why you've changed the bicycle tag to bicycle=discouraged when this is a designated right of way? The access rights are not affected by the physical condition of the path. Please see the guidance note for more details https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Further_guidance_on_tagging_Public_Rights_of_Way_in_the_United_Kingdom
G_Meredith (2023-07-08 08:34:11+00:00): The problem I had was that mapping services were routing along this way. It is not viable for bicycles especially when laden.   Tag has been removed and replaced with smoothness = impassable, which for bicycles it is. This will ensure cycle tourists are routed through Helston.
G_Meredith (2023-07-08 08:37:49+00:00): And while you are here could you please reply to my comment on. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131728922#map=14/50.0863/-5.2927
NorthCrab_upload (2023-05-26 16:50:17+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/565131347

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
StC (2023-05-31 20:27:46+00:00): Bonjour,

attention que la modification du chemin 249519262 a interrompu deux relations de randonnée en faisant déborder le chemin au delà de l'intersection. C'est une erreur que nous rencontrons souvent ces derniers temps en assurant la surveillance de la continuité des itinéraires.

Cordialement,

StC
felipeeugenio (2023-05-26 17:18:05+00:00): Estimado. Por favor cuidar la ortografía
emersonveenstra (2023-05-26 22:27:40+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for your contributions, however this is not a tertiary road, this is a service road. See the wiki page here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=service?uselang=en 

Could you please change this back? Thanks!
JeroenHoek (2023-05-26 17:15:14+00:00): Dan zijn voetgangers ook toegestaan waarschijnlijk. Je kan hier de beide bicycle en foot-tags beter helemaal verwijderen.
eggie (2023-05-26 18:49:31+00:00): mofa=no heb ik nog even verwijderd
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-05-26 18:56:42+00:00): Kan me niet voorstellen dat die oneway=yes op de fietspaden klopt.
Ik zie aan beide zijden haaientanden bij de oversteek Schoterlandseweg bij nr 58. Ik heb yes in no veranderd.
Graag reactie
eggie
TrunkTraveler (2023-05-30 17:23:56+00:00): Correction: Source used was Maxar Premium Imagery
BCNorwich (2023-05-28 07:19:35+00:00): Removed ways incorrectly tagged as highways and or areas. Reinstated deleted areas.
user_5359 (2023-05-27 06:22:01+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice: we use a separate key building=yes instead of area=yes and name=building.
VictorIE (2023-05-27 09:35:23+00:00): Hi, 

survey_date=* is documented as survey:date=* 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:survey:date
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-28 22:33:49+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 136557095, 136557254, 136557361, 136557452, 136557483, 136557567, 136557628, 136557644, 136557755, 136557767, 136557843, 136557861, 136557948, 136557965, 136557997, 136558585, 136558649, 136558837, 136558843, 136558873, 136558932, 136559260, 136559308, 136559339, 136559367, 136559512, 136559593, 136559617, 136559647, 136559890, 136559987, 136560399, 136560492, 136560558, 136560594, 136560636, 136560909, 136561023, 136561063, 136561094, 136561151, 136561251, 136561297, 136561418, 136561492, 136561505, 136561545, 136561550, 136561555, 136561557, 136561564, 136561637, 136561716, 136561912, 136561938, 136561968, 136561976, 136561991, 136561998, 136562026, 136562046, 136562064, 136562089, 136562103, 136562230, 136562237, 136562239, 136562240, 136562244, 136562254, 136562257, 136562263, 136562265, 136562273, 136562307, 136598226, 136598241, 136598263, 136598354, 136598420, 136598443.