piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Greg91 (2024-08-27 11:09:21+00:00): May I respectfully disagree with everything=)

1) Creation of retaining wall is superficial - the basin boundary/wall is one real-world feature and, hence, should be one object. (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element)
Additional information about basin wall that it is a wall and not a slope, IMO, is not sufficient to justify the duplication:
a) that is a responsibility of the person on the ground
b) there is a lot of space to navigate around, so that ability to cross the area is not of high importance

2) I was also surprised, that the basin is tagged as natural, not man-made, but that's what the documentation says! All kinds of water bodies, even constructed, are supposed to be "natural": https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Template:Map_Features:basin

+ quote from wiki about "natural" tag: "The natural key is used to describe a wide variety of physical geography, geological and landcover features, including ones that have been modified or created by humans." (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:natural)

3) "brownfield" is a new tag for me. From what is in the wiki, it is a tag to describe a landuse, while the basins we are talking about are more like distinct objects/amenities, rather than landuse. Imo, they are objects located within "landuse=park" (albeit unmarked). It is not a lot for re-development, it is ... a disused amenity.

=> I vouch to revert this changeset

Yet, thank you very much for your thoughtful approach!
yelisey90 (2024-08-27 12:04:45+00:00): 1) You misinterpret the "One feature, one OSM element" practice. Its main point is that tags that mean the same should not be duplicated in two OSM entities, and it explicitly states that one OSM entity should only contain tags relating to one processable feature. That's just what I was talking all this time: barrier & the feature enclosed by it should not be mapped as one element, there should be a line for the barrier and a (multi)polygon for the area.
Nothing of the above means that there shouldn't be an entity for the border if there is an entity for the area.
And I definitely insist that a wall should be mapped. We are not constrained by any technical means, so we can map as much info as we can describe. There is no such thing as "responsibility of the person on the ground", and no such thing as inherent "importance" of one thing or other. If something exists, it can freely be mapped ;)) [With possible exceptions for military, personal info etc.]
You can never know how the information from OSM will be used. One can generate maps for sport orienteering using exports from OSM, like this: https://iorient.ru/download/Maps/2023/Spring-in-Jrvezh/map.png
In such cases the difference between walls and slopes is of critical importance.
(to be continued)
yelisey90 (2024-08-27 12:16:24+00:00): 2) I don't argue that a basin shouldn't be mapped with a "natural" key. I only feel that the prefix "disused:" isn't really appropriate for the "natural" key. The prefix "was:" is more encompassing, why not to use it in such cases? But I don't have a hard stance on this issue.

3) "brownfield" is pretty much anything that one was developed, but isn't anymore (and hasn't become totally overgrown as yet). A typical example is a once paved surface with some rubble and some grass or shrubs starting to grow from it, — that is, just what the basin floor are now. After some time, it will become natural=grass, but as yet, it's just a waste of space. And no, there do not need to be any plans for redevelopment for an area to be a brownfield, it's just a present state of land.
shahenda_ahmed (2024-08-27 08:53:58+00:00): Hello wiemzayati ;
I noticed you added roads that are already drawing on OSM and they made the roads duplicated.
For example,
this is road
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1311281305
Identical and overlapped with
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1311361300
Also, you added floating roads
For example,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1311288787
and I fixed some issues in changesets
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155782749
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155776006
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155739028
Could you please fix these issues?
Regards
shahenda_ahmed
VA00 (2024-10-17 16:36:15+00:00): Czy ścieżka faktycznie jest dostępna? Wygląda na prowadzącą przez czyjeś podwórko. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1307560519
YomanNH (2024-10-18 06:48:34+00:00): Już tu pytałem autora o istnienie wspomnianej drogi: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155211365. Coś poprawił, ale dalej nie ma podstaw twierdzić, że droga rzeczywiście istnieje.
Sylvain M (2026-02-16 11:13:24+00:00): Well done !
You created the node 9999999999 :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9999999999
😉
Sylvain M (2026-02-16 11:14:32+00:00): Sorry, it was in this changeset, already commented :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125779486
CasGroenigen (2026-02-16 11:53:16+00:00): Haha thanks, still nice to celebrate it 😄
eggie (2024-08-26 14:50:57+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback Wat bedoel je met Boerenland?
En is hier daadwerkelijk een park om te wandelen terwijl de tag hier akkerland is?

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-08-26 14:56:04+00:00): Op de meest recente sat foto van 29 juni j.l.  is geen spoor van een park te zien.
eggie (2024-08-26 16:35:47+00:00): reverted by changeset #155792050
eggie (2024-08-26 16:38:40+00:00): Bedoel je wellicht dat hier een zonnepark komt?
Kovoschiz (2024-08-27 06:54:39+00:00): Please don't directly delete something that is being reconstructed. You should change it to `highway=construction` .
gabro00 (2024-08-26 18:13:55+00:00): Szia! Az autókereskedés bővült 2011 óta, kérlek javítsd (helyesen szerepelt, lásd pl. Bing).
sen_takeya (2024-09-15 09:33:53+00:00): Hello,Popolon
Can you remember the name of the store?
sen_takeya (2024-09-24 01:09:07+00:00): I haven't heard back from you, and I've been thinking since then that maybe the name of the mobile van style store is "PANTAPI"? and It's on the first floor, right?
sen_takeya (2025-01-02 15:37:34+00:00): Supprimé
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160913590
Popolon (2025-01-12 15:49:10+00:00): yes
Popolon (2025-01-12 15:50:50+00:00): I don't know the name I just take a sandwich at their store. Come in 2 times in few weeks, it was still here. Did you verified it closed since?
alesarrett (2024-08-27 04:58:05+00:00): Ciao Uragano, in questo changeset ha aggiunto un nome alquanto strano a un edificio (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/374701788). Puoi giustificarlo in qualche modo? Altrimenti va tolto.
Uragano (2024-08-27 06:47:35+00:00): Buongiorno, il nome nasce dall'uomo che ci abita e mi aveva chiesto se potevo aggiungerlo. In ogni caso l'ho rimosso
alesarrett (2024-08-27 16:46:42+00:00): Grazie
Jrachi (2024-08-29 06:05:13+00:00): Usare il nome della località per dare il nome alle strade è opinabile, e di solito è errato.
marcomay (2024-08-29 06:19:12+00:00): Era già così prima, ho semplicemente corretto il nome
Jrachi (2024-08-29 09:24:08+00:00): Una buona occasione per correggere l'errore!
Langlaeufer (2024-08-27 09:54:48+00:00): Ist der Weg schon beschildert? Radverkehr frei?Fußweg? Rad- und Fußweg?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/155787133
whitespeed (2024-08-27 19:59:40+00:00): Es gibt noch keine Beschilderung. Stand heute, 27.08.2024, bin gerade nochmal dort entlang gefahren.
Langlaeufer (2024-08-27 20:16:08+00:00): Ich pass dann schonmal sidewalk an der Hirschfelder Straße an. sidewalk no ist nicht mehr richtig. Für einen Radweg bedarf es aber vermutlich einer Beschilderung von daher würde ich cycleway noch auf no lassen.
Langlaeufer (2024-08-27 20:28:54+00:00): Gibt es irgendwelche anderen Merkmale die ihn klar als Radweg erkennen lassen? Weil sonst ist es ein Geheg. Benutzungspflichtig wird er als Radweg vermutlich nicht. Ist ja nur eine Sackgasse für Kfz
whitespeed (2024-08-27 22:17:47+00:00): Ich denke nicht, dass der Weg durch irgendwelche Merkmale klar als Radweg erkennbar ist. Höchstens implizit als Anschlussweg des für KfZ gesperrten, offiziell als "Radweg" bezeichneten Weges:
https://werneuchen-info.de/radweg-werneuchen-hirschfelde-offiziell-uebergeben/
Xvtn (2024-09-05 15:44:40+00:00): Nice sleuthing!
Kovoschiz (2024-08-27 06:57:08+00:00): 1. Please don't use `building=warehouse` for the entire land. The `landuse=industrial` should be kept. 
2. Please don't delete `=greenfield` for empty cleared land
Kovoschiz (2024-08-27 06:58:02+00:00): 3. As mentioned before, please don't delete something that you haven't even drawn back
Kovoschiz (2024-08-27 10:49:33+00:00): 4. Please don't delete `landuse=` when you draw `building=` . They are different aspects.
emersonveenstra (2024-08-27 17:15:33+00:00): Hi there,

Did you mean to leave https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12138008386 disconnected from https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/40448445?
jtrull (2024-08-27 17:18:30+00:00): Fixed. Thanks!
onovy (2024-08-26 16:54:15+00:00): Please always keep changes local - in smaller area than half of world. And write correct comment for every change.

Thank you.
JeroenHoek (2024-08-27 16:33:43+00:00): Are you just adding fixmes to entities with 'Fuck' in the name? 'Fuck' is a Brazilian surname. It looks like you added a bunch of completely pointless fixme-tags in Brazil to entities which actually look correct.

Could you revert this?
JeroenHoek (2024-08-27 17:10:10+00:00): Look at this official government map for 'Residência Fuck':

https://geoftp.ibge.gov.br/cartas_e_mapas/mapas_municipais/colecao_de_mapas_municipais/2022/SC/monte_castelo/A0_4211108_MM.pdf

(It's there.)
JeroenHoek (2024-08-28 09:43:59+00:00): coteyka, do you want me to revert this? 

(You are making edits, but not responding to these comments.)
user-3965077544 (2025-10-29 21:28:50+00:00): Sauf erreur de ma part la station C.Vélo "Les Paulines" ne se situe pas à cet endroit
Teremys (2025-10-30 09:00:20+00:00): Bonjour, 
La station a été déplacée le temps des travaux :

https://www.c-velo.fr/2023/11/13/travaux-dans-le-secteur-les-paulines/

Mais effectivement le nouvel emplacement a l'air d'avoir été mis en place depuis, je vais déplacer le point 

Merci pour le signalement et bonne journée  !
eggie (2024-08-26 15:39:53+00:00): Dag Papyrologist,

Zal de geografische naam echt Hondendolterrein zijn.
Of is dit een naam die alleen in de buurt zo wordt gebruikt. In dat geval loc_name gebruiken.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-08-26 15:42:54+00:00): Dag Renee   Met editor iD kun je geen relaties bewerken De routerelaties gaan dan stuk. 
Er zijn hier verschillende routes stuk.
Wat bedoel je met Parkstadroute?
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-08-26 15:52:19+00:00): Ik kijk even of het simpel te herstellen is, want de route 3-44 was hiervoor ook al stuk.

In OSM lopen OV-, wandel- en fietsroutes. Die kun je niet zomaar onderbreken. Dan doen ze het niet meer.
eggie (2024-08-26 16:27:12+00:00): Ik krijg bij repareren conflicten. Ik heb even de fietsrouteexpert gevraagd om te assisteren. Wellicht was hij al bezig of ben jij weer aan het mappen?
dvdhoven (2024-08-26 17:24:12+00:00): Voor Parkstadroute zie het forum:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/parkstadroute-in-aanleg/116109
Andere mappers zijn er ook mee bezig.
szydzio (2024-09-02 09:00:14+00:00): Cześć! 
Przy okazji tagowania pod 2D/3D prośba o nie kasowanie pojedynczych węzłów z punktami adresowymi (np. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3185461736
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3185463137) i zastępowanie ich zbiorczymi numerami (ze średnikami) na obrysach budynków. Te adresy funkcjonują jako samodzielne numery zarówno w ewidencji gminnej jak i w terenie. Pozdr!
eggie (2024-08-26 16:32:14+00:00): Dag Papyrologist,
De routeralteis zijn nog oke want je hebt niets gesplitst.  Met iD geen routes bewerken, althans niet splitsen.
Gebruik JOSM daarvoor.
Welk type fietspad is dit geworden?
G11, 13, 12a?

G11: mofa=yes, moped=no, traffic_sign=NL:G11
G12a: moped=designated, mofa=designated, traffic_sign=NL:G12a
G13: moped=no, mofa=no, traffic_sign=NL:G13

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Cycleway


Groet
eggie
eggie (2024-08-26 16:41:49+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:embankment

embankment=levee zie ik geen enkele wiki staan.
Is het niet gewoon embankment=yes?
Papyrologist (2024-08-27 09:20:20+00:00): Hi eggie,

Er staat een G11 bord (vanochtend gekeken). Hele pad vanaf strandje tot Scheeresluis.

Optie embankment=levee stond in de dropdown, vandaar gekozen (betreft een dijk met pad).

Groet!
eggie (2024-08-27 09:26:09+00:00): Oke.. Ook weer wat geleerd. :)
rene78 (2024-08-31 16:46:59+00:00): Hi Alexis,

OsmAnd has deleted all those international names for Monaco. Was this on purpose or a bug in the app?

Cheers
Rene
Derick Rethans (2025-01-17 11:20:37+00:00): Hi,

can you please *not* add separate footpaths for roads where there is no separate footpaths. Normal pavements should *not* be mapped like this.

I will have to remove them again.

cheers,
Derick
rskedgell (2025-01-17 11:43:54+00:00): And your vandalism will be reverted and reported to DWG.
kitsee (2025-01-18 23:58:55+00:00): Hi Derick.
Mapping sidewalks as separate ways is an approved proposal giving it the highest status of legitimacy in this community. Sidewalks do not have to be separated from the highway to be mapped as a separate way. As the wiki states, a sidewalk mapped as a separate way is a refinement of footway tags. Allowing more detail to be added than is possible with highway tags alone. I would suggest you have a read of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sidewalks before continuing. If you wish to discuss the mapping of sidewalks I would suggestion you do so on the forums as there is a ongoing conversation. 

If you do choose to remove these sidewalks then I have to agree with rskedgell that it cannot be described as anything other than vandalism. These sidewalks are perfectly acceptable and in many ways preferable to tags on the highway.

Kind regards,
Kits
OSM_RogerWilco (2024-08-26 18:06:33+00:00): Danke für die Korrektur! Das bicycle=yes kann noch weg...
NeisBot (2024-08-26 15:50:38+00:00): Hi Realxeng, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 81% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 26 highway(s)
- 10 building(s)
- 44 natural(s)
- 9 landuse(')

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=155789589
Realxeng (2024-08-26 15:57:28+00:00): The deletion are intentional as the buildings, area, and roads have been removed in place for the new airport terminal. one deletion of a shop near the interchange is due to the destruction of the old, closed shop.
pitscheplatsch (2024-08-28 19:25:50+00:00): Thanks for your answer!

#HappyMapping
silversurfer83 (2024-08-28 16:22:41+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap :)

Danke, dass du hilfst die Karte aktuell zu halten.

Du hast die letzten Tage einige fehlende Gebäude und Adressen eingetragen und auch darum gebeten, dass sich jemand mal die Änderung(en) ansieht.
Das machen hier, wie praktisch alles, Freiwillige wenn sie Lust und Zeit haben. Wasn Glück, ich guck grad ;)

Also: Deine Häuser und Adressen sehen prinzipiell gut und richtig aus.

Kannst du etwas verbessern? Klar :)
In NRW kannst du dir die Liegenschaftskarte als Hintergrund anzeigen lassen und wenn diese mit dem Luftbild ziemlich übereinstimmt, dann wird in NRW die Liegenschaftskarte abgezeichnet. Um deine Gebäude dann noch schön rechtwinklig zu bekommen nutzt du die Taste "Q" (bei runden Objekten die Taste "O"). Schon sind die Gebäude rechtwinklig. Probier es einfach mal mit deinen neuen Gebäuden aus. (bitte nicht löschen und neu zeichnen)

Bei Fragen ist die Community 24/7 unter c.osm.org zu errreichen und das Wiki liefert unter wiki.osm.org immer Infos.

happy mapping
silversurfer83
MistikRuz (2025-03-08 11:36:05+00:00): Hi,
This place name: Bou Ramilaka بو رميلاكه, you have added it inappropriately on OSM by copying it on google map
https://maps.app.goo.gl/kmQ71CvzBCY7iwLz8
It is not pronunciable by anyone, it is neither arabic nor kabyle.
You should never add data from sources protected by copyright or Google Maps, because it constitutes a violation.
Best regards,
frodrigo (2024-09-06 20:13:55+00:00): Bonjour. Vous faites des modifications contraires aux bonnes pratiques

https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/1691675873

Il ne faut pas inventer de tag comme "Capital Régional" . Les tags à utiliser sont ceux documentés sur le wiki wiki.osm.org

Il ne faut pas non plus supprimer toutes les traductions.

En fait c'état déjà très bien avant que vous ne fassiez des modifications.
Alexis_gast33 (2024-09-09 09:36:39+00:00): Oui mais pour les traductions nous sommes en France ici en parle que français et les langues régionales français c'est tout nous sommes en France ici nous sommes pas dans les pays étrangers 
c'est la vérité pour les arrondissements et les capitales il dis des conneries sur wikipédia
Alexis_gast33 (2024-09-09 09:38:22+00:00): ça me regarde sauf les créateurs de l'application
frodrigo (2024-09-09 10:18:19+00:00): OpenStreetMap c'est une base mondiale. Utilisé partout dans le monde. Les noms des tags sont normés sur le wiki. On ne met pas ce que l'on veut, sinon les applications ne les reconnaissent pas.

Les traductions des noms son aussi utile pour les étrangers. Si vous regardez une carte du Japon sans la version française des noms, vous faites comment pour la lire ? C'est donc réciproque de garder les noms en langue étrangère en France.
Vinber-Pro (2024-09-09 10:44:29+00:00): normalement j'ai récupéré les noms effacés.

Alexis si vous considérez que cela ne regarde que vous vous n'avez pas forcément compris l'esprit d'OpenStreetMap.

Je suis en gironde, si vous avez envie d'en discuter à l'occasion, avec plaisir.

Cependant évitez les effacements comme cela, si vous avez des doutes, laissez les informations et/ou posez des questions, par exemple sur le forum https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/

bonne carto
Alexis_gast33 (2024-09-09 12:58:26+00:00): moi aussi je suis de la Gironde je veux pas d'embrouille avec vous mais je vous remercie pour les conseils bonne journée à vous
Alexis_gast33 (2024-09-09 12:59:57+00:00): ne vous inquiétez pas je touche plus aux traductions vous pouvez le remettre si vous voulez mais je vous remercie
Vinber-Pro (2024-09-09 13:44:22+00:00): non il n'est pas question d'embrouille c'est que parfois il est plus simple d'en discuter en direct
didier2020 (2024-08-27 06:52:52+00:00): Hello,
Existing paths that you have modified are uploaded as new ways.
this generates a very large quantity of duplicates (way or node).
You need to fix this. check your changeset with josm
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-08-26 21:40:49+00:00): Multipolygons are areas. Tagging the outer way as fairways is duplicate tagging and incorrect. Continued incorrect mapping will be considered vandalism.







On 2024-08-26 14:56:52 UTC Blixt99 wrote:

> I correctly edited the golf course fairways as areas with the proper tag golf=fairway as noted here ------>https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:golf=fairway
> 
> Please leave my proper edits alone. Please do not revert them when I have made a correct edit.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-08-26 21:50:52+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Area "More complex areas are defined using multipolygon relations, which may specify multiple boundary ways."
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-08-26 21:59:57+00:00): reverted
Vinber-Pro (2024-09-06 12:49:26+00:00): Bonjour,
pourquoi retirez vous les différents name:XX=* ?
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/node/26698157

pas sur de comprendre mais ne comprenant pas tout je suis curieux ?

à plus
Filip009 (2024-08-30 06:35:53+00:00): Zdravím, po úprave budovy ju prosím spravoúhlite. Robí sa to pomocou klávesovej skratky Q alebo pravý klik na budovu a možnosť "Usporiadať do pravého uhla".
MichS (2024-08-30 05:52:56+00:00): Hallo,

nun beim Ortsschild wäre gut gewesen den Name zu schreiben, wie er auf der Homepage der Ortsgemeinde steht.

Der Bindestrich hat wohl mit der Länge des Ortsnamens zu tun. Das zusätzliche Leerzeichen im Name steht bestimmt nicht auf dem Schild.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Zrop (2024-08-27 11:31:08+00:00): Hallo eköln,
Kitas/Kindertageseinrichtungen werden mit "amenity=kindergarten" gemappt.
Und die Hausnummer ist laut der Webseite 34c.

Zrop
unzow (2024-08-29 17:15:47+00:00): updated as advised
divaddivag (2024-08-27 09:49:52+00:00): Merci pour la photo c'est top que tu l'ai déposée sur WikiCommons. Si c'est un sujet qui t'intéresse, on peut en parler un de ces jours: c'est mon TOC :-) . Tu peux interagir simplement avec ces éléments ici: https://www.openstreetbrowser.org/#map=15/49.1305/-0.3971&basemap=osm-mapnik&categories=memorial
karr4s (2024-08-27 10:24:14+00:00): Oh bah de rien. Je n'ai pas de TOC particulier mais j'aime bien ajouter des photos sur des trucs dans la zone de vie. Du coup, si jamais tu veux m'envoyer prendre des photos à Caen ou alentours, j'en profiterai pour faire une ballade à vélo. :)
divaddivag (2024-08-28 10:50:53+00:00): Au gré de tes ballades, une piste intéressante est d'alimenter/rapprocher dans OSM cette catégorie: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Plaques_in_Caen. Sur le concept des clés wikidata pour faire le lien entre différents objets, c'est bien illustré à Tour en Bessin au sujet d'une déportée/résistante: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1QlG

Perso je trouve que c'est de la contribution super enrichissante. Au plaisir d'en discuter. D
villasv (2024-08-26 17:14:13+00:00): The down ramp is not marked as a pedestrian path, it's a paved segment that bicycles can use to connect to the causeway & bridge bike lanes. See https://vancouver.ca/files/cov/Stanley-Park-trails-map.pdf
Gregory Peony (2024-11-15 02:59:58+00:00): Going forward please start logically structuring your uploads/changesets and submit USEFUL comments with them. A useful comment tells other users what you did, and why you did it. This is important because it makes working with your changesets significantly easier and saves contributors time. If a changeset is well structured and has a good comment I may not have to view it visually to understand it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/155794282
Gregory Peony (2024-11-15 03:00:03+00:00): To get you thinking about good changesets lest look at WAY: 103138423. Previously it was tagged as a building; you changed it to a roof. Why? Did you see something in the imagery to confirm it? Have you actually seen it yourself? If it was previously mapped as a building, then it's possible that a future contributor will map it as such again. If they look at the history and find a good explanation for why it has been mapped that way then they'll be less likely to change it. If they do change it (and it is in fact a roof) then it'll be easier to rectify and maintain. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/155794282
eggie (2024-08-27 11:10:24+00:00): ... en Niels wat heb je met al die reviews gedaan?

gr eggie
villasv (2024-08-26 17:47:24+00:00): Cyclists often don't even dismount here, but there is signage explicitly marking it as a non-bicycle path🚳. Walking the bicycle here is not forbidden and using bicycles=no confuses cycling routers & maps, so bicycles=dismount is more appropriate since this foot path directly connects two bike lanes.
joel56dt (2024-08-27 04:32:03+00:00): I agree. Good change, thanks.
eggie (2024-08-27 11:25:05+00:00): Niels   Groeit het gras ook over het fietspad heen? 
gr eggie
eggie (2024-08-27 11:19:10+00:00): Nield svp niet het gras aan het fietspad vastplakken.
gr eggie