piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
gszkr (2026-06-05 15:23:08+00:00): I kolejny obiekt z d. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1309955681 - TAM NIC NIE MA! Dobrze, że już Pan nie udytuje, bo tego bałaganu któy Pan narobił nie nadąża się sprzątać ...
felipeeugenio (2024-08-22 23:11:59+00:00): Hola. Muchas gracias por sus ediciones. Por favor no realinear calles.
Las fotos que usted está usando son las de Bing, pero hay mas proveedores, cada uno con su alineación distinta.
Puede ingresar al chat de la comunidad OSM Chile en Telegram en el link que hay en mi perfil si tiene cualquier duda. Pero por lo pronto no hacer eso.

Todo el resto está ok y es hasta posible usar la página del SII si quiere completar las direcciones del barrio.

Ingresar al chat para más explicaciones.
Saludos y bienvenenido
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/155627750
MakeItBetter (2025-03-09 00:01:23+00:00): Please use OSM defintions of Suburb, Quarter, and Neighborhood, not the normal US usage. See: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dsuburb

Quarter and Neighborhood should only be used when describing a sub-area of an area. Otherwise, Suburb should always be used.
LockOnGuy (2024-08-23 01:25:34+00:00): What did you edit here? why you removed all of those?     
Please write a good changeset comment in future.
marc__marc (2024-09-30 23:07:20+00:00): Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/219410546
you didn't put the same wording on the way and on the relation 
вулиця Польова <> Польова вулиця
sorcrosc (2024-08-23 22:20:54+00:00): Questa è una spiaggia normale, come la maggior parte della spiagge italiane. Non c'è nessuna propensione per nudismo, topless o altre tendenze per cui hai aggiunto tag inventati. Di sicuro non è un tourism=attraction per questo motivo.
Perché stai aggiungendo questi dettagli su elementi in tutto il mondo. Dove prendi le informazioni?
ivanbranco (2024-08-23 22:54:22+00:00): >Non c'è nessuna propensione per nudismo

Mi intrufolo solo per un appunto, "nessuna" forse é esagerato, alla foce del fiume Cesano sembra esserci una propensione, c'é anche un gruppo di +300 membri su Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/1384188005143344/ e a giudicare dal logo é anche riconosciuta da Anita, una delle piú grandi (se non la piú grande) associazione naturista Italiana.
sorcrosc (2024-08-23 23:18:23+00:00): Non lo sapevo. Immagino sia la frazione di spiaggia tra il fiume e l'inizio del centro abitato. Bisogna suddividere l'area e mettere i tag solo in quel punto.
Ciao
ivanbranco (2024-08-24 07:20:16+00:00): Comunque mi accodo alla domanda sulle fonti, dubito che che carlosassuncao92 abbia visitato tutti i posti che sta modificando in giro per il mondo (ma mai dire mai).
EHCG (2024-08-22 22:19:48+00:00): Nachtrag: Zudem fixme in Köln Süd behoben
catonano (2024-08-23 07:45:19+00:00): il nudismo qui è praticato di fatto ma formalmente non è consentito

si rischia una multa

e poi non è praticato in corrispondenza del posto 9, solo più a est
redd (2024-08-22 22:43:40+00:00): Für Diskussion rund um diese Baustellenmaßnahme habe ich diese Notiz erstellt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4397486
redd (2024-08-22 22:44:18+00:00): Korrektur Link: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4397484
d3mol3k (2024-08-23 12:05:17+00:00): Chcialbym przypomnieć że zmiany nastapią od 1 września 2024 r wiec zmiany nazw przystanków obowiązujacych sa nie na miejscu. Wiec zmiany prosze wycofac i wprowadzić je 31 sierpnia w nocy.
d3mol3k (2024-08-23 16:11:16+00:00): Wycofuję zmiany bo dotycząc obecnych do 31.08.2024 używancyh nazw. Ponadto kilka dodanych przystanków nie jest w ich prawidłowych miejscach.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-08-23 00:02:13+00:00): Please provide a source
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-08-23 09:37:43+00:00): Please provide a source
Enock4seth (2024-08-24 13:53:41+00:00): Hi, thanks for mapping, kindly zoom enough to see existing objects before adding new one to avoid duplicates and overlaps. Also avoid attaching the building nodes to roads.
aTarom (2024-08-23 07:14:54+00:00): Hola, com son tan nous alguns tags prefereixo preguntar primer abans de intentar corregir res, aquest tag
"ref:ipad"
a
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1115602978/history
es segur un typo de "ref:ipac" oi?
Disculpa si està a la documentació, falta de temps, salutacions cordials.
jaulina (2024-08-27 12:39:17+00:00): Hola, moltes gràcies per fer-m'ho saber. I perdona el retard en contestar, l'OSM és encara nou per a mi i no me n'havia adonat del comentari. En tot cas, ja ho he corregit. Gràcies de nou!
Glassman (2026-02-11 02:56:51+00:00): I know this was a couple of years back, but do you know why you added bicycle=permissive to a couple of short ways infront of the train/bus station bldg? I'm trying to create a bike map and they don't connect to anything.
Natfoot (2026-02-11 14:58:01+00:00): There are some roads here listed as "no through traffic" or "bus only" So bikes are allowed through access.. . ?
jtracey (2024-08-23 00:28:51+00:00): resolves https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4378861
n76 (2025-01-18 18:58:43+00:00): Is tourism=viewpoint the correct tagging for this? Typically a viewpoint has a view of more than just surrounding trees, a building and the sky. . .

And there certainly is no sign or other item showing this has the name of "Viewpoint at the end of the Universe".

Unfortunately, I don’t see a good existing tagging on the OSM Wiki for a location used for star parties. So I don’k know what else to suggest. I will start a conversation on the OSM help forum to see if anyone has a good suggestion.
bmirwald (2025-01-20 06:37:31+00:00): Hi, I agree to @n76 - I expect a viewpoint to be a terrestrial one. Nevertheless, why not publish the information that sometimes star parties happen there? The best way to do that seems to add the "description" key to the parking lot, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description
In that description, you could mention the name and maybe a URL where more info on the star parties is available.
As I am no experienced OSMapper, feel free to suggest better ways to deal with it.
nevw (2024-08-24 09:06:08+00:00): Hi
osmi selects your edit as having a wrongly constructed multipolygon.
Maybe it would be easier to not use a multipolygon for this.
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=153.42775&lat=-28.06684&zoom=18
nevw (2024-08-24 09:08:40+00:00): If you want to use a multipolgon you will need to draw it without any inner rings touching the outer ring ass you can see with others that are mapped nearby.
GeeMaps! (2024-08-24 22:54:08+00:00): Thanks Nev. I tried that but seemed that the bunker just above the green was causing issues, maybe because the fairway wasn't all the way around it? I'll have another play later.
GeeMaps! (2024-08-25 03:40:58+00:00): Deleted & redone so hope that's fixed it now?
smeòrach (2024-08-25 18:14:12+00:00): Dè th' ann an "Fairgeinn"?
jSeke (2024-08-25 22:27:22+00:00): Gorgie (cuideachd Gorgain) - o briothannais guar- (cuimris gor- / gàidhlig fa(i)r- / beurla over) agus cȳn (cumris cŷn / gàidhlig gèinn / beurla wedge)

tha Gogar coltach a-rèir Watson: o Go+côr / Fo+car / under+bound, leis a sin bhiodh an t-ainm Fochar
smeòrach (2024-08-26 16:05:39+00:00): Tha sin gu math inntinneach, ach bheil an t-ainm ud ann an chleachdadh, ge-tà? 'S e sin a tha mi faighneachd. Craigleith, Corstorphine, ainmean a leithid - tha e follaiseachd dè as ciall dhaibh sa Ghàidhlig - ach bu chòir dha "Fairgeinn" agus ainmean a leithid a bhith ann an leabhar etymology. Chan e leabhar etymology a th' ann an OpenStreetMap, agus chan eil còir aig a h-uile h-ainm-àite air eadar-theangachadh. Feumaidh an t-ainm a bhith ann an cleachdadh ga-rìribh (ma tha e air soidhne steisean treana tha sin ceart gu leòr mar eisempleir) neo aig a' char as lugha bhith "plausible".
jSeke (2024-08-27 11:36:31+00:00): ceart gu leòr, atharraichidh mi e gu Gorgain
Gorger (2024-10-10 12:26:42+00:00): Hello elliott_
Thank you for mapping!
I have created missing buildings: way 1314771035, way 1314771034, way 1314771037.
Please inspect your task carefully before closing.
Happy Mapping!
nevw (2024-08-23 02:13:07+00:00): Hi, the correct tag is building=house.
A landuse tag is for a block or suburb or town and encloses all the residential properties for landuse=residential
tyfi (2024-08-23 02:05:45+00:00): Some addr:postcode tags were also removed
tyfi (2024-08-23 02:31:10+00:00): "is_in" is completely redundant nowadays, and I am confident that, on state route ways specifically, they will not be missed. Redundancy/denormalization is good for perf optimizations sometimes, but it's super easy to find enclosing munis/CDPs
tyfi (2024-08-23 02:25:20+00:00): This tag is meant for buildings and POIs
tyfi (2024-08-23 02:28:40+00:00): This only affected ways participating in state routes, also, as determined by this Overpass Turbo query:

area[name="Missouri"];
way(area)[ref~"(^|;)MO "]["addr:postcode"];
Baloo Uriza (2024-09-04 14:55:27+00:00): Looks like you completely stomped on the destination and junction tagging in the process.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/155631584
welzheimerwald (2024-08-23 03:04:47+00:00): Wer sich über die große BBox wundert: es wurden ein paar "is_in"s im westfälischen Freudenberg mitentfernt ;)
henner9595 (2024-08-27 14:24:32+00:00): Moin,
wäre nett wenn du in Zukunft in solchen Fällen zwei Änderungssätze raus machst.

Gruß, Henner
welzheimerwald (2024-08-27 21:38:39+00:00): War eine schlampige Overpass-Abfrage nach Placenodes innerhalb einer adm. Boundary-Relation der admin-Ebene=8 mit dem Namen Freudenberg. Kommt nicht wieder vor ;)
tyfi (2024-08-23 03:04:51+00:00): Query used:

[timeout:120];
area[name="Missouri"];
way(area)[ref~"(^|;)MO A(;|$)"][name="State Highway A"];
(._;>;);
out meta;
tyfi (2024-08-23 03:27:55+00:00): I am aware that this left some ways with name_2 tags but no name tags when the latter was targeted. This will be remedied by promoting name_2 when it wouldn't overwrite name
PcMouse1 (2024-08-23 07:04:43+00:00): What specifically did you update on Old Hastings Road? Please be more descriptive in your changeset comments.
FoxyBooi (2024-08-23 12:07:10+00:00): Changed the road type to gravel, changed the lanes to 1.5, changed "one way" to no
fortera_au (2024-08-23 05:42:21+00:00): Hey, is way 1308275843 actually segregated? I don't think there's separation between walking and cycling along there
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/155632453
fortera_au (2024-08-27 06:03:19+00:00): I've changed it to segregated=no as there's no visible segregation between walking and cycling users that I can see on aerial imagery or from past walking in that area, please let me know and correct me if it has recently changed though.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/155632453
kether924 (2024-08-27 06:48:48+00:00): No definitely think you're right - was editing a bunch of shared paths to fix segregated tag missing so think I got it mixed up or just mistagged. Thanks!
fortera_au (2024-08-27 07:37:17+00:00): Not a problem!
LockOnGuy (2024-08-23 07:56:53+00:00):  Abdullah Abbas, I had left you many comments, yet you refuse to reply.      
You shall not put a name that is not used as the name. The name you are adding as name is not used by locals, and all the people refer it by Shuhada Saif Saad, not the name you are changing into. please stop this. You can have the the other name as alt but not as the main.
LockOnGuy (2024-08-23 07:57:24+00:00):  Abdullah Abbas, I had left you many comments, yet you refuse to reply.      
You shall not put a name that is not used as the name. The name you are adding as name is not used by locals, and all the people refer it by Saif Saad, not the name you are changing into. please stop this. You can have the the other name as alt but not as the main.
Eman Ghareeb (2024-08-26 13:19:44+00:00): Hello LockOnGuy;
Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap in Iraq,
I noticed you removed a link
Link for the deleted link :
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/1283592495
and made the road "Dead-end"
Link for this street that will be dead-end:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1205479837
Could you please provide us with the source you used to remove this link and check this issue?
Regard
Eman Ghareeb
LockOnGuy (2024-08-26 13:25:05+00:00): Source is mentioned in the changeset.   
Regards.
LockOnGuy (2024-08-26 13:31:19+00:00): + here is a sat image that was posted 20 hours ago if you want to validate.     
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/ieR742QaHP4ZVF8G/?mibextid=     
The project will be ended in less than a month and all roads will be open.
Eman Ghareeb (2024-08-26 14:01:32+00:00): Hello LockOnGuy;
Thank you for your quick reply, I totally agree with your points, I just updated this segment not to make the routing in this location floating
Here is a changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155784240.
Regards
tyfi (2024-08-23 04:36:04+00:00): This primarily impacts tiger:* tags, although many name="State Road X" and name="Highway X" are removed, as well.

There seems to be a million ways to render a state route designation into text, and none of them can elegantly handle concurrencies
tyfi (2024-08-23 04:36:42+00:00): By leveraged, I mean I'm using search in JOSM.
tyfi (2024-08-23 04:37:51+00:00): This also found and fixed instances of ways named "Foo;State Highway X" and "Bar / State Road X", etc., where delimiters were put in the name tag. I felt these were in scope for this changeset due to the route lettering
catonano (2024-08-23 07:41:50+00:00): il nudismo qui è praticato di fatto ma formalmente non è consentito

si rischia una multa
catonano (2024-08-23 07:42:29+00:00): chiedo scusa, mi riferivo ad un'altra spiaggia
phoenixsaigon1698 (2024-08-23 06:34:24+00:00): cái này đừng có vẽ sát với Ngõ 120 trường chinh quá.
zhiar590 (2024-08-26 18:52:52+00:00): hi thanks for the edits but these roads are no longer exist because of a residential development the aerial imagery are little outdated
WanakaLake (2024-08-27 15:09:32+00:00):  Hello there, thank you for reaching out about these roadways I added here recently. I do not have updated enough resources to make any edits here, but I would be happy to defer to your edits since you have knowledge of this area. Thanks again for reaching out and happy mapping!
eggie (2024-08-23 07:35:40+00:00): Dag Hagelslag

Al die accesstags zijn default op zo'n weg als de Ondernemingsweg.
Die hoef je niet toe te voegen.
Denk dat die categorieën eraf kunnen. 
Maar volgens mij is het priveterrein art 461 wvs

Je zou algemeen access=permissive kunnen taggen. Dan routeert het in ieder geval voor klanten en bezorgdiensten. 
Mocht er een gesloten hek staan dan access=private.. 
We zijn wat behoudender geworden met dat access=private. access=unknown hebben gebruikers niets aan.
Kijk je nog even.
MVG
eggie
Hagelslag (2024-08-23 19:19:36+00:00): Hi, je hebt gelijk, bij de ondernemersweg staat inderdaad zo'n bordje. Ik dacht dat het publiek toegankelijk was, omdat precies aan de andere kant van de Amsterdamseweg, een soortgelijke weg is. Maar daar staat geen bordje. De andere wijzigingen sta ik wel achter.
eggie (2024-08-23 19:32:58+00:00): Oke... Ik heb niets gewijzigd...  Up to you!

Mapse
eggie
Hagelslag (2024-08-24 06:39:11+00:00): Ik heb het teruggedraaid. Dank voor je review en hulp, keep up the good work!
Yui2 (2024-08-23 13:39:50+00:00): 为什么要删？
osmviborg (2024-08-23 06:34:10+00:00): Du har ikke styr på multipolygoner. Giver ID dig ikke fejl- meddelelser?
osmviborg (2024-08-23 06:40:55+00:00): Det er fint du vil definere mindre skovområder indenfor et større skovområde; men det går galt med de multipolygoner.
fortera_au (2024-08-23 10:37:12+00:00): Hi, is the whole building Unit 4?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/155635636
August@Alltraders (2024-08-23 11:39:04+00:00): Correct.
fortera_au (2024-08-23 12:05:34+00:00): All good! Just wanted to check since the building only had a house number before.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/155635636
silversurfer83 (2024-08-24 09:01:49+00:00): Moin Sylvio :)

ich möchte dir für deine zukünftigen Edits gerne zwei Seiten aus dem Wiki (grundsätzlich eine gute Anlaufstelle bei Unsicherheiten) mitgeben:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:colour

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history

bei Fragen immer raus damit und weiter viel Spaß an der Karte

silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/155636311
SylvioMeg (2024-08-24 10:46:43+00:00): Danke für die Hinweise. Muss zugestehen das ich zu selten editiere.
trial (2025-08-12 20:10:11+00:00): Voir https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170282816. Ne pas hésiter à faire un revert.
LockOnGuy (2024-08-24 02:51:00+00:00): Please stop this vandalistic behavior. I still do not understand why you want to remove a neighborhood node https://osm.mapki.com/history/node/11629870960 from the map when it exists on the ground. This is pure vandalism, please stop this. You are engaging in an edit war with all of the local mappers from Baghdad, BaghdadiMapper, Yousif Isam, aseele, and me. You keep deleting it and calling everyone a sockpuppet, which is not acceptable behavior. I will revert this changeset, and I hope you refrain from making such edits in the future.
gitouche (2024-10-19 19:15:16+00:00): Bonjour, access=private interdit tout accès. Si il y a bien des panneaux "sauf riverains", le bon tag est access=destination. Cf. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:access#Valeurs_possibles
hendrix33 (2024-10-20 06:47:57+00:00): Bonjour,
Merci, modifications effectuées.
Bonne journée
eggie (2024-08-23 07:38:22+00:00): Dag Rupk  Lijkt me oke.. Bij die laadpalen zou je ook nog een street_side parking kunnen intekenen. Dan is het herkenbaar als parkeermogelijkheid. 
Mapse
eggie
aseidel (2024-08-27 12:58:07+00:00): Liebe MSchnieders,
bitte keine Tags löschen, die der realen Lage vor Ort entsprechen. In der Gartenstraße (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/217141602 ab Hessenweg nach Westen) gibt es keine Spurmarkierungen auf der Straße. Der vorhandene Tag lane_markings=no war daher hier richtig. Ich habe ihn wiederhergestellt.
Herzliche Grüße
Antje Seidel
#lgmaps
trigpoint (2024-08-23 07:47:11+00:00): Bore da
Just adding buildings is pointless, its not as though in Cymru the emergency services do not have access to OS mapping, they are very unlikely to use OSM.
If you genuinely want to help OSM, although this area has active mappers, please add other useful information which is available from OS Opendata Streetview (layer in iD) such as farm names.
Diolch Phil
ujinevich (2024-08-28 18:53:07+00:00): I was participating in HOT OSM Project that aimed to map buildings here. I don't have additional information about this place

Best regards,
Eugene
eggie (2024-08-23 09:32:35+00:00): Dag Noah Je hebt de school 2x ingevoegd, maar op verschillende adressen.
Op welke adresnode staat de school bekend?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-08-23 09:35:12+00:00): Volgens de website van de school is dit het juiste adres
 Henry Dunantstraat 8
6543 KR Nijmegen
eggie (2024-08-23 09:45:38+00:00): Ik heb je nfo gekopieerd naar adresnode nr 8 en de dubble vermelding verwijderd.

MVG
eggie
geomaniX (2024-08-23 12:12:59+00:00): Hi there,
welcome to OSM!
You added websites to some Hotels which aren't their official homepages.
The website-tag is for official homepages only: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:website 

I'd recommend to remove the third-party websites again.

Regards
geomaniX
Jan Fekete (2024-08-23 13:57:27+00:00): Hi, thank you for letting me know! I am sorry, I am new to OSM and am trying my best.

So, we have this website as well as others on file for cases when we were not able to find an official propery website. We feel it’s better to point the user in some direction than not to include any website at all.

Anyway, could you suggest other way to add this kind of website? Or would you suggest not to add it at all?

Thank you.
Jrachi (2025-03-21 09:06:15+00:00): 

Ciao.
Controlla il ref:REI è di 12 caratteri
Ivo
aseidel (2024-08-27 13:09:06+00:00): Liebe Sonja_H,
bitte nochmal prüfen, ob bei diesem Wirtschaftsweg smoothness=very_bad wirklich angemessen ist. Anhand der Bilder halte ich ein smoothness=bad für passender, da der Weg zumindest auf den mit Kopfsteinpflaster befestigten Abschnitten mit einem normalen Rad befahrbar ist (unkomfortabel, aber ohne absteigen zu müssen). Außerdem bitte tracktype=* prüfen: durchgehend befestigte Wege haben tracktype=grade1, mit Lesesteinen ausgebesserte Wege mit Bewuchs in der Mitte müssten auf tracktype=grade3 oder darunter geändert werden (siehe auch: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:tracktype).
Danke und herzliche Grüße
Antje Seidel
#lgmaps
eggie (2024-08-23 15:14:47+00:00): Dag B Snijders..

Hier is net wandelroute 44 80  weer hersteld zie ik.
Mvg
Eggie
eggie (2024-08-23 17:13:34+00:00): Tip Wanneer je routerelaties wilt bewerken kan dat niet met editor iD. Je zult dan moeten overstappen naat editor JOSM.
editor josm stap voor stap
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/editor-josm-stap-voor-stap/75047


Een aanrader.
B Snijders (2024-08-23 18:47:01+00:00): Ik ga zeker overstappen op JOSM zeker omdat het nu nog makkelijk voor mij is, ik ben toch nog niet gewend aan editor ID . Ik had het al gedownload maar nog niet echt bekeken. 

Als je die twee vinkjes bedoeld, dat was een test van mij. Ik heb ze zelf ter plaatse via OSMAND gemaakt bij de locatie van de poorten. Ik heb ze daarna verwerkt en de opmerkingen afgesloten.
citrula (2024-08-23 20:47:39+00:00): Please don't use the description field to advertise your store - I have removed the description.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/155637985
Nakaner-repair (2026-04-30 11:18:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 182028718 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by user user_1890314. Reason: low quality contributions with Orgnaic Maps, personal notes, disrespect towards other mappers
tony emery (2025-07-17 09:22:00+00:00): Bonjour,
Vous avez supprimé la clé "area = yes" des 2 aires de service qui permettait d'indiquer qu'il s'agit d'une surface et non d'une ligne fermée. 
Cela entraine des erreurs d’interprétation pour certains rendus.
Merci de bien vouloir remettre cette clé dans les objets concernés par la clé highway.
Bonne journée,
EUMapper (2025-07-17 12:40:19+00:00): Bonjour,
area=yes est indiqué comme remarque et à enlever dans osmose, c'est la raison pour laquelle je l'ai enlevé.
Si vous voulez regarder: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:highway%3Drest_area
Le rest_area ne nécessite pas area:yes

Bien à vous!
EUMapper
tony emery (2025-07-17 13:40:40+00:00): Merci pour la réponse. Du coup, je suis d'accord pour le highway= rest_area. Mais là, il s'agit du highway = services. Je pense qu'il faut maintenir le area = yes. Qu'en pensez-vous ?
EUMapper (2025-07-18 18:37:34+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:highway%3Dservices
la différence est seulement avec ou sans station d'essence ou boutique. Je ne mettrais pas area:yes sur les highway:services
habi (2024-10-21 20:14:14+00:00): Ciao Galappi
Die beiden "Strände" haben sicher keinen solchen Namen.
Bitte erfasse nur Dinge, die in der Realität auch so existieren.
Gruss,
habi
map per (2024-09-01 19:32:44+00:00): Wegen review requested:
Die Änderung sieht gut aus, danke! Den alten Standort am Hauptbahnhof hab ich jetzt auch noch entfernt.

Viele Grüße
map per
damianeue (2024-08-23 08:49:26+00:00): I will fix way #679764425 geometry after I've finished adding buildings
yukijoou (2024-08-23 14:00:47+00:00): This seems like a massive edit of very unrealted places. Did you verify all those?