piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Lockstar (2023-11-25 03:45:14+00:00): Yes, ive been adding/updating signalised crossings.  Not intended to break the cycleway/cycle route links.  I will fix these wherever I've unintentionally broken them.  Thanks.
ChromeLotus (2023-11-30 23:10:09+00:00): Hello evgeniyakz, thank you for contributions to OSM! I noticed a large number of restriction relations created through your changesets in Almaty City, particularly this one. For instance, when investigating https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/228470690, I noticed on recent Yandex imagery a column of vehicles preparing to make a left turn into nулица Акан Серы and painted turning arrows on the ground permit such a maneuver. I am curious what the source for these changes is and if it’s more accurate than the ground level imagery from Yandex. Looking forward to hearing from you!

--Automatic Translation-- (in Russian)

Привет, evgeniyakz, спасибо за вклад в OSM! Я заметил большое количество ограничений, созданных с помощью ваших наборов изменений в городе Алматы, особенно этот. Например, исследуя https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/228470690, я заметил на недавних снимках Яндекса колонну транспортных средств, готовящихся повернуть налево на улицу Акан Серы, и нарисованные на земле стрелки поворота разрешают такой маневр. . Мне любопытно, каков источник этих изменений и является ли он более точным, чем снимки наземного уровня с Яндекса. С нетерпением жду Вашего ответа!
BodhidharmaI (2024-07-07 12:36:31+00:00): 153 m peak (Node 11342834975) - where did you take its height from? What source?
Virtho (2024-07-07 13:03:05+00:00): Hello
Measurement levelled with an aircraft
This amount of sand due to Harbor construction is not yet on map!
silversurfer83 (2023-11-12 20:43:32+00:00): Gude

die Ladestation ist jetzt etwas schwierig zu interpretieren:
Eigentlich ist es eine Station für Fahrräder aber nun kann sie 2x 150kW und 2x 300kW? Das passt nicht zusammen.

Wie ist denn die Situation dort genau?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143922275
MxxCon (2023-11-14 23:40:01+00:00): Hello.
You replaced 4 separate buildings with a single one on 68th Drive. This doesn't seem to be correct. Looking at the deleted buildings, they each had their own unique BIN number in NYC's DOB database. Furthermore, looking at this area in Zola there are 4 different plots of land with different owners.
Could you please elaborate why did you combine them?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143922337
woodpeck_repair (2023-11-14 13:31:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 144011037, 144011002, 144010984, 144011043 where the changeset comment is: revert edits des users Zinkeisen
skadi (2025-06-15 16:00:53+00:00): я бы наверное track оставил, основной маршрут через 3рутки, через бурлацкое ездят меньше, дорога используется реже и в основном лесовозами
ivanbranco (2023-11-12 12:08:00+00:00): You have 4 changesets and already reverting. Maybe before starting an edit war it would be better to have a discussion with the other user.
LockOnGuy (2023-11-12 11:21:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted in full by changeset 143929431 and the changeset comment is: Revert changeset 143923323 when a user changed the official name of the Airport street to an offensive, problematic and not official name.
sadegh sadegh (2023-11-12 11:44:33+00:00): please read article: Iraqi authorities name the main street to Baghdad Airport "Abu Mahdi Al-Muhandis" on this link : https://shafaq.com/en/Iraq-News/Iraqi-authorities-name-the-main-street-to-Baghdad-Airport-Abu-Mahdi-Al-Muhandis
LockOnGuy (2023-11-12 11:55:45+00:00): I'm local to this area, and this article is not correct. The PMU and the rest of the terrorist groups like Hezbollah put up some signs illegally with this name against the will of the government and the people. The official name is Airport Street in Arabic "شارع المطار" and it is the one used by the government, people, and the one on the street signs.    
Please do not change names of such important objects in places that are foreign to you again, especially when the names you are adding are problematic and offensive like this.     
Regards.
John Hanover (2023-11-12 08:05:33+00:00): Apologies for the bounding box size.
silversurfer83 (2023-11-12 19:57:50+00:00): Ha! Found a good spot for editing :)
Don't worry
Arturo Francisco Barbero (2023-11-12 10:16:55+00:00): Este vial presenta en este tramo al conectar la AP-61 con la N-601 y la N-110 un trafico elevadísimo nada comparable con el del resto del recorrido además de unas características en la vía similares a los de ambas N.
dieghernan (2023-11-12 13:07:27+00:00): Lo conozco bien, en cuanto a tráfico la SG-313 suele tener más o menos el mismo (o incluso más en mi experiencia). En cuanto a características de carretera (tipo de calzada, señaletica, arcén) es igualmente comparable. Aun así la N-110 y N-603 tienen sensiblemente más tráfico y presentan algunas características adicionales (quitamiedos, desdoblamientos en cruces) que no presentan estas. Entiendo por eso que ambas N y estas SG no han de ser clasificadas de la misma manera, aparte de que como digo me alineo con las directrices de etiquetado y la clasificación estatal (Nacionales vs. Red Complementaria Local)
dieghernan (2023-11-12 13:10:05+00:00): Aparte que la AP-61 no conecta exactamente aquí, sino en la N-603 antes de llegar a Otero (el puente lleva meses en obras) aunque supongo que lo conoces
dieghernan (2023-11-12 14:03:49+00:00): En cuanto a tu afirmación sobre el tráfico, te remito a datos para no basar la discusión en percepciones. Según la JyCl (año 2022, mapa de tráfico) la SG-723 y la SG-313 tienen niveles de tráfico parecidos (algo mas la 723) pero de lejos comparado con  las CL que son highway=primary. Por otro lado, con criterio de intensidad de tráfico, ¿se debería considerar la CL-605 entre Sta María y Montuenga como secondary)? ¿O la SG-342 entre Sta Maria y Nava como primary)? ¿Y que hacer con la CL-601 en Valsain, que apenas tiene tráfico, se debería clasificar como tertiary? https://carreterasytransportes.jcyl.es/web/jcyl/CarreterasTransportes/es/Plantilla100Detalle/1284349710614/Publicacion/1285326776728/Redaccion
Arturo Francisco Barbero (2023-11-13 08:07:03+00:00): Honestamente creo que utilizar el criterio del tráfico como una variable más. No colocaría la SG-723 al mismo nivel que las nacionales, pero si a un nivel mayor que una secundaria.
Y lo de la CL-601 realmente me sorprende, tenía entendido que soportaba una cantidad de tráfico enorme.
dieghernan (2023-11-13 09:14:24+00:00): Error mio en la CL-601, efectivamente soporta mucho tráfico. Me fije en la CL-603. En cualquier caso desde el grupo de Telegram CyL me remiten a que la clasificación basada en Normalización física (incluido el criterio de instensidad de tráfico) NO está consensuada y el disclaimer dice que no se debe mapear de acuerdo a este criterio hasta que haya un consenso. Adjunto el link

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Normalizaci%C3%B3n_f%C3%ADsica
RSydes (2023-11-12 08:12:46+00:00): Ignore the "source=website" tag.  It was autofilled, and I forgot to change it before uploading.
pesticides (2023-11-12 08:25:21+00:00): I meant Bothell, not Kenmore
Geo-Tobi (2024-11-28 17:43:05+00:00): Warum hier Access=yes?
Geo-Tobi (2024-11-28 17:44:00+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/33549119#map=19/48.049669/11.963171&layers=N
sbre (2023-11-12 17:20:36+00:00): Where is this data from?
tungstentt (2024-01-17 16:27:05+00:00): I use the MML/NLS and MML Ortofoto as background image not for automatic import.
I put all the ways by hand into Openstreetmap.
From time to time I have had conversation with houtari and he told me, using MML/NLS and MML Orthofoto is okay (by hand but no automatic import).
MarcoR (2023-11-13 07:46:33+00:00): Ciao e benvenuta/o su OpenStreetMap!

payment:cards è un po' (troppo) generico; sarebbe meglio specificare quali tipi di carte sono accettate (è noioso ma potrebbe essere utile ad esempio per chi viene dall'estero). Generalmente in Italia sono accettati quasi ovunque payment:bancomat, payment:visa e payment:mastercard  ma bisognerebbe controllare caso per caso.

Non c'è alcuna fretta: magari la prossima volta potresti dare un'occhiata agli adesivi presenti vicino alle casse :)

Buon mapping,
Marco.
eggie (2023-11-12 10:17:25+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback   Je geeft aan layer=-1  Maar waarom? 
Dan ligt het pad onder het maaiveld.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-11-12 10:21:38+00:00): Is het Hans van Daelpad werkelijk een tunnel?
gr eggie
eggie (2023-11-12 10:25:23+00:00): Je bedoeling zal vast wel goed zijn, maar ik heb je edits terugezet naar de oorspronkelijke tagging.
Het viaduct Europaweg loopt nu over het fietspad heen. 
Mapse
eggie
Arno018 (2023-11-12 11:17:42+00:00): Het klopt zoals jij het nu hebt staan. Toen ik het stuk zag en nog niks had gedaan, zag ik de melding dat het kruiste met de europaweg. Toen dacht ik viaduct toevoegen. Volgens mij kwam OSM zelf met level -1
thx
Arno018 (2023-11-12 11:18:47+00:00): Weg nog een vraag: enig idee, waarom bv in de webapp: afstandmeten.nl dit stuk niet routeerbaar is?
eggie (2023-11-12 12:17:55+00:00): Dag Arno....

Er ligt mij bij dat er iets aan de hand was met de routing-engine die afstandmeten gebruikt.

Het kan ook zijn dat de updates van hun router die ze gebruiken met OSM als basis gewoon nog niet doorgevoerd zijn en/of worden.
Zal zo eens kijken of er iets over te vidnen is en anders een vraag voor het forum.

In de OSM routers routeert het  wel. 
Sinds 5 aug jl staat het fietspad al open voor routering.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-11-12 12:20:43+00:00): " Toen dacht ik viaduct toevoegen. Volgens mij kwam OSM zelf met level -1" 

Klinkt logisch...  Het viaduct was ook te kort ingetekend. Dat is nu hersteld. 
Het is altijd of een viaduct .. of een stukje tunnel.
In dit geval dus een viaduct en is een tunnel niet nodig.
layer=-1 is niet nodig, want er duikt geen weg de grond in. Het blijft gewoon maaiveldhoogte.
eggie (2023-11-12 12:27:35+00:00): Zie hier de oorzaak van je probleem
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/afstandmeten-nl-rare-dingen-bij-pogingen/92241/7

Jelle Kok werkt de router om de paar maanden bij. Dat verklaart waarom het hier niet routeert. 

Mapse
eggie
eggie (2023-11-12 10:19:31+00:00): Arno,

Je hoeft niet aan te geven bicycle=yes 
Dat is default.. Het is immers een verplicht fietspad.
Ga er gerust van uit dat veel in OSM al gewoon goed is getagd. layer=-1 en bicycle=yes klopt hier dus niet.

MVG
eggie
Tomas Straupis (2023-11-12 15:48:32+00:00): Hello. Please do not remove tags you do not know the meaning of. If local community has added them - there is probably a reason why.
Claudius Henrichs (2024-01-28 20:06:59+00:00): I couldn't find service=long_distance documented anywhere. Can you help me find documentation of it? It seems to be a tagging only used for train routes otherwise.
Tomas Straupis (2024-01-29 05:34:34+00:00): We do not document tags in wiki.osm.org. This was used to maintain hierarchy. There should be none of those left now.
user_5359 (2023-11-17 08:35:49+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1222914732. what is the mean of the tag typzast_p = sklad, hangár?
Tatti Barletta (2023-11-12 13:24:11+00:00): Ciao, volevo farti notare questo passaggio riguardo ai link e alle rotatorie dalla wiki inglese (c'è anche un'immagine a lato): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_link#Roundabouts
In poche parole: l'accesso alla rotatoria rimane mappato come il resto della strada, le corsie predisposte per _evitare_ la rotatoria diventano link.

Sì, è l'opposto di quanto scritto nella wiki italiana, ma onestamente mi sembra una traduzione grossolana (o magari solamente obsoleta?).
Susymala (2023-11-12 14:57:25+00:00): Ok. Grazie.
Correggo.
In effetti tempo fa mappavo come dici tu, recentemente invece avevo corretto, sbagliando, seguendo quella indicazione del wiki italiano
berndw (2023-11-12 10:06:31+00:00): Wie komme ich auf Todtmoos?
 ;-)
rskedgell (2023-11-16 16:20:15+00:00): What makes you think that St. Katharine's Way is a residential street?

Have you ever been there?
rskedgell (2023-11-24 07:58:33+00:00): St Katharine's Way restored to highway=unclassified in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144396708#
evkalina (2023-11-27 16:57:52+00:00): because cities are residential areas and streets inside the city are residential streets in most if not all of oms cities. ty
rskedgell (2023-11-27 19:11:52+00:00): Sorry, that's a ludicrous argument. 

From the wiki: "The highway=residential tag is used on roads that provide access to, or within, residential areas but which are not normally used as through routes."

St Katharine's way does not pass through or abut a landuse=residential polygon. It's not a residential street.
Filip009 (2023-11-14 07:23:17+00:00): Is it just closed or destroyed?

Je len zatvorená, alebo zrušená?
Peter Angelov (2023-11-14 07:48:48+00:00): Zrušená.
arjunaraoc (2024-01-04 08:52:15+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143927662
rskedgell (2023-11-12 12:44:02+00:00): If this is a cannon, then historic=cannon is correct and documented.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dcannon
evkalina (2023-11-27 17:07:19+00:00): yes, it is a canon. the problem is that it is not a site, it is a man made object, and as a site it cannot be visualized in oms. feel free to find an appropriate solution.
rskedgell (2023-11-27 19:25:31+00:00): In which case, it was correctly tagged as historic=cannon, which I have restored. It is not and never has been an installation artwork.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic=cannon

Please do not tag for the renderer just because something is not currently rendered in the OSM Carto tiles. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer

If you would like to suggest an appropriate rendering for historic=cannon objects, you could raise a new issue on the project at https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-05-24 08:21:35+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/219909462/history has surface = 3 that was added in this edit
What this tag means? Numeric value is unexpected here and it is unclear what it means
JamJar II (2026-05-24 19:34:19+00:00): Well spotted. And apologies. Surface s a mixture of gravel and grass so I will delete this value. Thanks for flagging
aixbrick (2023-11-12 11:37:43+00:00): Danke :-)
Jordi MF (2023-11-12 10:44:06+00:00): Afegits topònims (Camí de la Juvea) segons informador local José Miguel Mut.
HellMap (2023-11-12 11:38:35+00:00): Hello!

It seems very unlikely that this is the name of the memorial/gravestone, let alone written in Ukrainian. Passing by this (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=922495375646553&focus=photo), I do not see any obvious inscription of such length. Can you please specify where exactly is this text found that you have added?

Thanks

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Verifiability
HellMap (2023-11-13 10:21:38+00:00): You have now added an English name, which is different to the previous "name". Can you please clarify where these names are from? Are these descriptions and, if so, what is the source for them?
Thierry1030 (2023-12-31 20:39:38+00:00): hello,
you did an update of the cycle highway F103 between Lispersteenweg and the Kleine Nete ... can I ask you what is your source for doing this update?
thanks for your reply
Nielkrokodil (2024-08-27 15:04:06+00:00): Hi Jan,

Are you sure with this Kottingneusiedl Airfield? Its name will definitely not be English, and under the following link I cannot find it. Plus it is right above a stream. 
https://noe.gv.at/noe/Luftfahrt/Regionale_Flugplaetze_und_Flugfelder.html

Which source did you use? 

Did you do other map edits like this?
Jan Olieslagers (2024-08-27 15:13:27+00:00): Yes I did many more edits like this.
No I cannot be absolutely sure.
Still I did check satellite imagery, and it looks like a runway not right above the river but rather just next to it, as is not unusual for runways - such places are little useable for agriculture, so that farmers sometimes rent them out at favourable rates.
However, if you have local information, which I admittedly have not, please do improve on our database as you see appropriate!
Also, my source was already indicated at creation time. If you need the full detail, surf to https://ourairports.com/airports/AT-0017/changes.html
M.fr.Gr.,
george1201 (2023-11-12 21:24:22+00:00): Sieht doch gut aus. Nur noch Sonderzeichen aus der TelNr entfernen :-). Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:phone?uselang=de
Thorsten2219 (2023-11-13 06:19:50+00:00): Danke für's spontane Vorbeischauen + Tipp. Sekt, plopp, pling. Nach und nach wird es, noch einige Punkte außenrum zu lösen.
geomaniX (2023-11-12 15:57:18+00:00): Hi!
Du hast neben der Packstation auch noch zwei Kreise ohne Eigenschaften auf dem Gelände vom "Automotive Testing Papenburg" hinzugefügt.
War das beabsichtigt? Falls ja, dann wäre es gut, wenn die noch Eigenschaften bekommen würden.


VG geomaniX
B0rax (2023-11-12 16:32:33+00:00): Huch, du hast recht. Die Kreise sollten eigentlich nicht in diesem Änderungssatz enthalten sein, sondern separat hinzugefügt werden. Danke für den Hinweis.
Patrickov (2023-11-12 11:33:08+00:00): Hung Hom trip will be uploaded after 00:00 because the restored service starts tomorrow
Kovoschiz (2023-11-13 10:13:12+00:00): It doesn't matter much because transit data are usually not updated frequently. Sometimes weekly, often monthly.  Most apps in general only update daily, so you want to preload it before midnight. Again this doesn't matter much after the last trip of the day anyway.
Warin61 (2023-11-12 21:59:44+00:00): I take it there is no longer any way to go from Qantus Drive east bound to O'Riordan Street as you have removed the right turn lanes and there is a turn restriction in place. This means the bus route T-Bus Terminal Transfer can no longer run...

????????
Warin61 (2023-11-12 22:00:46+00:00): O'Riordan Street south bound ... just to clarify
Warin61 (2023-11-12 22:02:01+00:00): Arr... it becomes Sir Reginald Ansett Drive once through the intersection.
Warin61 (2023-11-12 22:19:35+00:00): ... I see ... update to new road ... Esri imagery would be the imagery to use. I have fixed the buss route and separated the joining roads so they can be used in route relations..
kmpoppe (2025-05-07 04:25:55+00:00): Hi arctic-rocinante,

the DWG received a complaint, that "Little India" was shown on the map rather than the surrounding suburb Harris Park.

I have explained to the complaintant that they were looking at the wrong scale of the map, yet, I was wondering, whether using "loc_name" instead of "name" for the neighbourhood would be more appropriate, because the complaintant said it was a locally used term, not an official name and your changeset comment also hints to it being more of "unoffcial" name.

Changing that would result in the name not being rendered by the standard Carto Map anymore, but it would still be searchable - also, we're not tagging for the renderer, right? ;-)

Please let me know your thoughts on this.

Thanks!

Kai
OSMF DataWorkingGroup (DWG)
arctic-rocinante (2025-05-07 07:42:14+00:00): Hi kmpoppe,

My understanding is that the name was made official some time within the last 12-24 months. The City of Paramatta installed several large “Welcome to Little India” signs in the area, along with a plaque bearing the name.

The signage is so prominent that some locals consider it an eyesore, and have petitioned for its removal:
https://www.change.org/p/replace-extravagant-eyesores-the-welcome-to-little-india-signs-in-harris-park

I feel like the common usage and official signage qualifies it for "name" rather than "loc_name", but clearly someone has a different opinion. Happy for you to make the final call on it 🙂

Cheers, James
Taya_S (2023-11-12 19:51:26+00:00): In deze edit had je een closed way van https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/204592813 gemaakt. Deze way is onderdeel van het nationale park. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2746127

Ik heb dit hersteld.
Dodko (2023-11-12 18:30:12+00:00): Z popisu zmien "details 1" nie je jasné čo si upravoval. Skús písať presnejšie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Dobr%C3%A9_koment%C3%A1%C5%99e_sad_zm%C4%9Bn
pavvv (2025-07-03 12:19:21+00:00): Teraz note na https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2805181605 nie ma sensu.
confusedbuffalo (2023-11-13 06:52:59+00:00): Do you think any of the tomb tags would fit here?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic=tomb

Perhaps tomb=vault?
ivanbranco (2023-11-13 16:26:32+00:00): Don't know, the person who created the notes should reply to this question, since they have on-the-ground knowledge. But I also suspect is tomb=vault.
confusedbuffalo (2023-11-14 06:28:33+00:00): Maybe they will respond to one of the notes, otherwise I guess it doesn't matter so much for now.
Đuro Jiří (2023-11-16 18:42:35+00:00): Secondo me è meglio 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tomb=columbarium?uselang=hr
Taya_S (2023-11-12 19:46:06+00:00): Ik heb deze changeset weer teruggedraaid. De naam Anserdennen staat al op de kaart, en dat kleine stukje heide heeft niet dezelfde naam als het NP.
LockOnGuy (2023-11-12 12:05:39+00:00): Hello sadegh sadegh, please do use meaningful changeset comments - “improve describe” does not help other mappers understand what you are doing.       
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
mcliquid (2023-11-12 17:46:33+00:00): Hi,

Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-)

One general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
emvee (2023-11-12 19:20:30+00:00): Thanks for reminding me, yes, should have split this.
canfe (2023-11-16 12:03:27+00:00): Anche qui, per favore, ortogonalizzale.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143930819
robyale2005 (2023-11-16 13:27:37+00:00): modificato. Grazie per l'osservazione
:wq (2023-11-15 11:01:15+00:00): Surface nie jest jedynym tagiem na oznaczanie typu nawierzchni na tej drodze. Na podstawie zdjęcia zmieniłam na tracktype=grade1
NorthCrab_upload (2023-11-12 12:50:23+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/172007477

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
WieKo68 (2024-06-11 07:50:56+00:00): poprawiono
MxxCon (2023-11-14 23:45:00+00:00): Hello.
It doesn't make sense creating unnamed landuse=residential if we have more details in the form of mapped buildings, especially individual landuses around single buildings. It doesn't really add any useful detail to the map.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143931974
Larmax (2023-11-16 12:37:25+00:00): Hi,
Adding landuse the way I did is somewhat standard elsewhere, at least in Europe and I doubt that it hurts anything either? Data added to OSM doesn't necessarily need to be "useful" as long as it's correct.
MxxCon (2023-11-16 16:25:48+00:00): It's not wrong and it doesn't hurt anything, true.
But with so many things still left to map and improve, it just seems sensible to spend time and effort on map features that would benefit to somebody.