piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
EfreetSK (2025-12-09 07:41:19+00:00): Dobrý deň, pozerám že v tejto zmene ste odbočenie na Nálepkovu (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/382566356) zmenili z highway=tertiary na  highway=unclassified. Tak sa snažím dopátrať že prečo sa to tak zmenilo. Totiž teraz napr. mapy.com vôbec neodporúčajú túto cestu (všimol som si že keď je cesta unclassified tak oni s ňou štandardne v navigácii nerátajú). Aj tak celkovo rozmýšľam či by tam nebolo lepšie dať napr. "Privádzač na cestu 3. triedy"
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtertiary_link

Ale najprv chcem zistiť že aké tam boli dôvody za tým
rkluvanec (2025-12-09 09:24:51+00:00): Dobrý deň,
ďakujem za upozornenie, ide o chybu. Súhlasím s návrhom zmeny na highway=tertiary_link, upravím.
Scout Jens (2025-11-28 17:39:44+00:00): Punkt 13130488943 kommt mir seltsam vor. der Bürgertsieg endet dort? Warum führt es überhaupt erst dorthin?
Karthoo (2025-11-28 18:52:51+00:00): Hallo, der Bürgersteig endet wirklich dort. Mit Bau der Rad- und Fussbrücke etwas nordwestlich wurde der Bürgersteig dort gesperrt. Kannst du gerne auch bei Mapillary nachsehen.

Grüße, Karthoo/Leon
dp7 (2025-09-09 09:16:26+00:00): Ciao. Questa way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1428239126 credo sia più corretto mapparla come isola spartitraffico piuttosto che come giardino.
Max1234-ITA (2025-09-09 10:13:56+00:00): Ciao, sì, può essere, dalle foto aeree non si capisce sempre bene... e con Ortezzano oggi le cose son complicate! :-)
Op'tRad (2026-05-20 15:48:33+00:00): Hallo Groen,
't Hexel: Ik heb bij dit buurthuis onderscheid gemaakt tussen de naam van de club en de(zelfde) naam van het gebouw. Daarbij een buurthuis is wat het IS en 't Hexel is de NAAM. Zie: (type) "osm tag name" en je vindt ergens 'name only'. Met de tag village hall is al bepaald wat het is en Buurthuis hoeft daarom niet voor de naam. Groet, Op'tRad
Fizzie-DWG (2025-09-18 01:31:06+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18744
user_5359 (2025-09-10 19:31:48+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/13130498735. What is the mean of the tag descs = INE-BO 4240604836-D
?
NeisBot (2025-09-09 08:06:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
pitscheplatsch (2025-09-14 08:21:30+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/171673020
NeisBot (2025-09-09 08:06:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description
pitscheplatsch (2025-09-14 08:21:00+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/171672927
viktoriia_frolova (2025-09-09 10:37:26+00:00): road geometry was fixed and turn restrictions were added based on Esri World Imagery (2022)
mavl (2025-09-09 13:28:43+00:00): Здравствуйте. Подскажите, пожалуйста, почему были изменены статусы дорог?
NeisBot (2025-09-09 08:33:40+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
pitscheplatsch (2025-09-14 08:20:32+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/171781891
user_5359 (2025-09-10 18:43:12+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/263389842. What is the mean of the tag real_alw = yes? Or did you mean real_ale?
trigpoint (2025-09-10 18:48:02+00:00): Yes, a typo, adjacent keys.

Fixed.

Thank you
Ex_libris (2025-09-09 08:55:26+00:00): Giving it some more thought I am inclined to give it a T2 rating as it involves some parts where hiking shoes come in useful
habi (2025-09-09 09:00:40+00:00): Und noch ein paar Pools dazu...
NeisBot (2025-09-09 09:00:39+00:00): Hello, thank you for your contribution.

Your changeset was commented because it appears to follow a pattern that could be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related.

Could you kindly confirm if your map edits were intentional?

#MapWithoutSpam #Name #Comment
user_5359 (2025-09-09 09:25:13+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Your changes have damaged the existing data to such an extent that I had to completely undo your changes and re-enter the data based on your sparse information. Please make sure to work more for the community when making your next changes.
pitscheplatsch (2025-09-14 08:19:56+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/171674827
yelisey90 (2025-09-09 10:08:07+00:00): what about these?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/833133271
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/481610328
xkillah (2025-09-09 10:16:55+00:00): ahh I didn't noticed they are closed too, you can fix em if you want
yelisey90 (2025-09-09 17:07:42+00:00): It's more subtle. One of them was bi-directional, and temporarily became one-way; the other was for 
buses only, but was temporarily open to general traffic. Has this changed back?
xkillah (2025-09-09 19:34:36+00:00): idk
Alliegaytor (2025-09-09 09:26:19+00:00): this looks like a driveway rather than a residential road
snavee17 (2025-09-09 09:56:46+00:00): Apologies for the mistake I committed. Thank you for the valuable feedback. I look forward to your suggestion/feedback in the future as well. Thank you.
eggie (2025-09-09 13:17:40+00:00): Hoi,

Het staat in de wiki weer net even anders.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:seamark:mooring:category%3Dpile
'k Vraag me ook af of je wel mooring moet gebruiken. 


MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-09-09 13:18:28+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Ddolphin

dolphin?
eggie (2025-09-09 10:34:36+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
lcmortensen (2025-12-31 02:45:21+00:00): Does Karamu Road North have a median barrier, or is it just a painted median?
If there is a no physical median barrier, we do not map each direction seperately. Otherwise, it implies you can't turn right over the painted median.
NeisBot (2025-09-09 09:30:40+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
pitscheplatsch (2025-09-14 08:19:16+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/171686024
fedoroff net (2025-09-20 08:35:41+00:00): зачем вы удаляете названия удаленных частей поселений? теперь не понятно какой деревне они принадлежат
anastasia_ (2025-09-22 16:02:53+00:00): Нет смысла в дубликации без place, удалила, создав актуальные границы place с единым общим названием (way/multi)
Juanmi81 (2025-09-09 16:37:44+00:00): No corresponde a una reserva natural, simplemente es un jardín con arboles y unas cañas de bambu.
Sylabowy Kot (2025-09-18 17:32:49+00:00): Nie zamieniaj obszarów rodzaje przeznaczenia terenu (landuse) w budynek. Nie widzisz, że zrobiłeś z tego molocha?
bxl-forever (2025-09-09 12:13:24+00:00): Thanks for adding details here.

However, please do not use tags such as "layer=1" on buildings if the purpose is to evade validator warnings.

In this edit, as long as in yesterday’s edit, you created a long footway across a building (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1428252282).  This mistake triggered the warning.  Cheating with the layer tags gets rid of the warning but keeps the error.

The correct way to map those situations is to cut the footway when crossing the building and tag the inner part as tunnel=building_passage.

Example of a fix here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1427974749
rempshaener (2025-09-09 17:25:44+00:00): Hallo,

du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Ich fange mal mit dem einfacheren Teil an, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/393482055:
Das amenity=fire_station sollte an das Gelände, nicht nur an das Gebäude. Das Gebäude erhält dann building=fire_station. Die Adresse (die dann an den Geländeumriss gehört) sollte vollständig eingegeben werden, also mit Straße, Ort usw.

Dann zu den übrigen Objekten:
OSM sollte nicht zu Testzwecken missbraucht werden. Insbesondere nicht zum „anzeigen des Kupplungstyps in OpenFire“. Das ist sogenanntes Tagging für den Renderer. Darauf deutet auch die offensichtlich renderingorientierte Eingabe von water_tank:volume=Kupplung Perrot hin. 
Hier ist beschrieben, was wie gerendert wird: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:OpenFireMap
Bitte lösche deine Testobjekte zeitnah wieder.

Viele Grüße
TrickyFoxy (2025-09-16 21:50:24+00:00): А что с детским садом?
aceman444 (2025-11-22 12:05:53+00:00): Zdravim, dakujem za udrziavanie IDS K. V Kvetoslavove sa Vam podarilo prepisat nazvy zastavok na cislo zony 111, napr. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3893604750 . Opravil som, ale pozrite, ci sa to nestalo aj v inych obciach.
eggie (2025-09-09 12:48:15+00:00): ... en daarmee zet je dus de hele routering voor voetgangers stop. Dat trottoir zit immers in de tagging van het fietspad met sidewalk=left

Je hoeft op fietspaden geen foot=yes of designated toe te voegen. Dat is allemaal default.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-09-09 12:54:03+00:00): Ik heb foot=use_sidepath verwijderd. 
Svp niet toevoegen als er geen apart ingetekende trottoirs zijn.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:foot%3Duse_sidepath


MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-09-09 12:55:26+00:00): Het routeert gewoon.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_foot&route=53.234233%2C6.546435%3B53.236975%2C6.540481#map=18/53.234729/6.545947
nokfi (2025-09-09 12:55:41+00:00): Het is vreemd. Ik heb een pdf van geofabrik van 20250901 gebruikt voor osrm, en het standaard foot profile om routes te genereren, en osrm pakt dat fietspad niet. Ik kom erop terug.
eggie (2025-09-09 13:03:13+00:00): Er ontbraken wel een paar dwarsverbindingen. Die heb ik toegevoegd. Staat even los van dat tunnelgedeelte.

Het ging er nu alleen mij om dat het kwartje valt wat foot=use_sidepath betekent en welk probleem dat geeft als er geen apart voetpad is ingetekend. 
Ben benieuwd..

foot=yes zie je wel vaak, maar is ook niet echt noodzakelijk. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-09-09 13:05:46+00:00): Hier ook nog even in OSRM
https://map.project-osrm.org/?z=18&center=53.236728%2C6.543190&loc=53.237420%2C6.542959&loc=53.235399%2C6.544322&hl=en&alt=0&srv=2
habi (2025-09-09 12:12:05+00:00): Sorry, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12363334793 hätte nicht hier reingehört...
Andrea Musuruane (2025-09-10 14:57:50+00:00): Ciao. Qual e' la fonte dei nomi delle strade? Grazie, Andrea
Max1234-ITA (2025-09-12 06:13:03+00:00): Ciao, ho eseguito il revert dei toponimi da me inseriti. -> https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171679082

Buon proseguimento!
Max
dp7 (2025-09-09 11:00:36+00:00): Ciao. Credo che il tuo intento fosse taggare questa fonte come drinking_water e non come fountain. Aggiungerei inoltre il tag historic.
Una tantum (2025-09-10 07:56:03+00:00): C'è una sorgente (fonte) che ho messo affianco per non mettere tutto sullo stesso nodo, ma l'interesse storico è effettivamente sulla fontana in quanto architettura, in quel senso ho messo fontana decorativa. Se è potabile (drinking water) non lo so, il link parla solo di elemento storico e architettonico significativo.
Una tantum (2025-09-10 07:57:27+00:00): fai le modifiche che credi opportune 👋
dp7 (2025-09-10 15:50:41+00:00): Si tratta di una fonte con lavatoio posta all'esterno del paese in corrispondenza di una sorgente, con funzione originaria più "tecnica" che decorativa. E' stata restaurata recentemente e non ci sono cartelli di acqua non potabile. In ogni caso, visto anche il tuo link, credo sia corretto il tag che hai utilizzato: mi limito ad aggiungere il building e il tag historic. Grazie dei chiarimenti, ciao !
Kovoschiz (2025-09-09 11:56:57+00:00): Wan Po Rd has a short `tunnel=` below. It's not a `bridge=` over MTR. What's actually a `bridge=` is Lohas Park Rd.
vectorial8192 (2025-09-09 12:12:53+00:00): The tracks can see supporting pillars. Wan Po Road looks like `=bridge` to me.

I can extrapolate the discussion to cover "integrated bridges" e.g. Tai Chung Road in Tsuen Wan currently mapped as "at surface" but is technically a large bridge over a covered ditch.
Kovoschiz (2025-09-10 20:06:49+00:00): Which pillars? Are they below the deck, and the outdoors section? The section in between under WPR has walls, no? 
Decked nullahs were discussed somewhere before. But they are different. You see joints on Tai Chung Rd. Simply I or no one has edited it yet. This should be structurally constructed as a box.
vectorial8192 (2025-09-11 11:51:00+00:00): I went there again, and yes I saw it wrongly. Those are supporting structural walls, not pillars.

This may suggest `tunnel=yes` but consider these tracks are actually at ground level (observe from Shek Kok Road), and one may see sunlight while riding TKL at this location. Doesn't make full sense to get `tunnel=yes` (eg contrast Yau Tong Station where sunlight does not exist).

Might we do `covered=yes`?
Kovoschiz (2025-09-11 19:48:10+00:00): 1. You can certainly have ground-level tunnels by building a box at that level. It's about the structure only. Eg you can have a ground-level `bridge=` when the obstacle is lower than the ground. 
2. Isn't it simply because it's a short one?
3. `covered=yes` only needs a cover above. The sides can be open. This isn't.
Kovoschiz (2025-09-11 19:50:21+00:00): I may have forgotten to add `embankment=yes`
user_5359 (2025-09-10 15:36:53+00:00): Hello! Please have. look on https://www.osm.org/way/1428259797. What is the mean of the tag Myjnia "RONDO" = driveway ?
gncrK (2025-09-10 18:59:23+00:00): Oh, thanks for the information, it was supposed to be the ‘name’ tag. I've already corrected it.
dypa (2025-09-10 10:08:36+00:00): Тут нет здания, непрозрачная стена вокруг мусорного контейнера

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171727748
geo_ozon (2025-09-25 07:34:59+00:00): спасибо, что исправили
Edelsalami (2025-09-09 12:50:38+00:00): Hi tux, du hast bei den Naturschutzgebieten wieder das Kürzel "NSG" in den Namen aufgenommen. Das widerspricht den Regeln wie sie im Wiki [1] beschrieben werden. Kannst du mir erklären warum du das gemacht hast? Danke.
Gruß

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure%3Dnature_reserve
tux67 (2025-09-09 13:19:55+00:00): Na - da ca. 90% der NSGs im Umfeld genau so gemappt sind ( https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2bjR ) hätte ich Stein und Bein geschworen, dass in genau diesem Wiki Artikel die Benamung identisch mit der Quelle im Geoportal ist. Mein Fehler das nicht noch mal zu verprobt zu haben.
Da aber der überwiegende Teil der NSGs im Umfeld genau so gemappt ist, sollte m.E. eine Änderung einheitlich erfolgen. Scheinbar haben diverse Mapper aus der Region über einen langen Zeitraum dieses Schema verwendet.
Dann wäre der Name aus der Verordnung in official_name - und der ohne "NSG" in name.
Für den Bereich Viersen gibt's eine Community mit einem aktiven Stammtisch .. die könntest du dafür Ansprechen. Für Heinsberg und MG kann die aktiven Mapper im Umfeld kontaktieren, wenn dir das ein echtes Anliegen ist.

Gruß
tux67
Edelsalami (2025-09-09 13:45:12+00:00): Danke für deine schnelle Antwort! Ja, das "NSG" im Namen sieht man noch ab und zu und dann meist regional gehäuft. Die Variante mit der Unterscheidung zw official_name und name finde ich gut. Wobei ich persönlich wohl (aus Faulheit) auf den official_name verzichten würde, weil die NSG mittels ID etc alle schon eindeutig identifizierbar sind. Aber mit official_name ist es natürlich präziser.

Keine Ahnung wies nun weitergeht - ich ändere solche Sachen nur nebenbei, wenn ich sie bemerke. Ich werde hier erstmal nichts weiter machen.

Gruß
dp7 (2025-09-09 12:19:01+00:00): Ciao. Perdonami ma non mi è chiaro cosa hai tentato di fare con questo changeset... la torre era mappata correttamente prima, ora non ci si capisce più niente !
dp7 (2025-09-09 16:04:20+00:00): Ho ripristinato la situazione come mi sembrava corretta con il changeset 171694136, fammi sapere se intendevi integrare o modificare qualcosa.

Questa la situazione precedente:
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz.php?c=171679564#19/43.03244/13.60865
Una tantum (2025-09-10 08:08:10+00:00): 1) ho creato un relation per indicare il castello che è composto dalle mura, dalla torre e da altro (non individuato) per linkare wikidata 2) ho visto un edifcio a forma di farfalla, insensato, e ho segnalato col fix me che la geometria andava rifatta
Una tantum (2025-09-10 08:11:18+00:00): L'informazione che il castello era composto da torre+mura + altro l'ho tratta da qui https://www.marcafermana.it/it/destinations/ortezzano/
Una tantum (2025-09-10 08:12:15+00:00): se ho fatto degli errori mi dispiace, correggi pure come credi meglio
Una tantum (2025-09-10 08:19:41+00:00): (ma vuoi dire che l'edificio a farfalla l'ho fatto io? davvero? =.= )
dp7 (2025-09-10 15:33:39+00:00): Grazie per la risposta e per i dettagli. Non preoccuparti per gli errori, ci sta e li faccio anch'io ! 😉
Quanto alla farfalla, probabilmente avevi premuto inavvertitamente T o Y sulla tastiera (o tasto dx del mouse), ribaltando gli oggetti della relazione e la parete dell'edificio collegato. Buon mapping ! 🗺️👍
Totor (2025-09-10 05:35:34+00:00): Hi, great seeing you are mapping in Cebu.
I'm not sure the modification in A.S. Fortuna is really needed. The separation between the lanes is done with temporary blocks and cones, and will probably be reverted in a few months...
MonteDesert (2025-09-11 21:37:30+00:00): Hi Totor,
Thank you for your input, I had added a oneway=yes previously, but removed it right after. I will keep in mind that the separation of lanes is temporary.
NeisBot (2025-09-09 11:15:40+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
pitscheplatsch (2025-09-14 08:18:41+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/171904690
NeisBot (2025-09-09 11:36:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
pitscheplatsch (2025-09-14 08:17:51+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/171685632
eggie (2025-09-09 11:55:20+00:00): 👍
Jan Olieslagers (2025-09-11 13:22:34+00:00): As far as I can see, the aerodrome remains active, you should not have removed it. Please repair the damage.
https://www.hultsfredairport.se/information-flygflight/
FahRadler (2025-09-14 15:19:56+00:00): Thanks for your Notice. i read a wrong comment. I fixed it.
Jan Olieslagers (2025-09-14 16:23:14+00:00): Thank you indeed! It is nice to agree :)
rempshaener (2025-09-09 17:13:11+00:00): Hello,

in this and other changesets, you have set review_requested=yes.
Since you only added ‘wikidata’, what exactly should be reviewed?

Best regards
Bartek444 (2026-01-10 22:36:32+00:00): Niestety https://relatify.monicz.dev nie radzi sobie z takimi trasami i skasowałeś trasę do Olkusza
Bartek444 (2026-01-10 23:21:35+00:00): Wygląda, że przerobiłeś na A12 na 267: Krowodrza Górka P+R => Skała Rynek
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10921996
adamos (2026-01-12 14:06:20+00:00): Hi, why would i do that? I was just fixing the roundabout
Bartek444 (2026-01-12 16:04:01+00:00): You're trimming 539 elements to 224. Why? I don't know. See the history: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18771095/history
Now it's fine.
adamos (2026-01-12 16:10:25+00:00): Which elements?
Steine42 (2025-12-19 10:39:40+00:00): 13130807910 appears to be a duplicate of node 4375669877, which already existed in OSM with a more precise location and additional properties.
ManuelB701 (2025-09-10 11:53:43+00:00): Diese waren übrigens über psv=yes freigegeben, welches alle Fahrzeuge des öffentlichen Verkehrs (d.h. Busse und Taxen) einschließt.
MVG_MLI (2025-09-10 12:03:27+00:00): Sehr merkwürdig, nach dem Import aktuelle karte, können wir unsere Georeferenzierung nicht mehr so über den HBF führen wie vorher.
woodpeck (2025-09-09 12:33:57+00:00): Hallo, ich habe even auf Bitten von ManuelB701 einen Revert bezüglich einer Bussspur an der Bingerstr. gemacht und dabei auch diese Relation wieder auf einen älteren Stand gesetzt. Könntest Du die Einbahnstraßen-Änderung hier nochmal neu machen? Das würde mir ersparen, so ganz ohne Ortskenntnis zu verstehen zu versuchen, worum es geht ;)
ManuelB701 (2025-09-09 12:37:33+00:00): Nicht nötig, war eigentlich meine Arbeit, dies zu erledigen. :)
user_5359 (2025-09-09 12:51:00+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on  https://www.osm.org/node/108119884. What is the mean of the tags
crossing:markings=no
description=not part of lakeside dr.
name=driveway
?

Does this path not exist up to the node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/108119825?
Arjun kp (2025-09-10 02:22:19+00:00): Hey @nileshbarawkar, are you really sure that U-turn is possible and allowed here?

My edit was based on survey and found that there is no scope for u turn here.
eggie (2025-09-09 13:11:05+00:00): Yep... prima.
Vinber (2025-10-31 17:27:53+00:00): bonjour,
j'ai passé en shop=second_hand c'est ok pour toi ?

ajouté une description en reprenant sur leur site "Un lieu pour se rencontrer, réparer, donner une seconde vie à nos objets et partager un bon petit plat !"

mis le website et qu'il accepte la gemme

bonne carto
nuitsfauves (2025-11-01 00:52:56+00:00): Oui nickel merci ! Il faudrait que je rajoute la gemme à d'autres commerces d'ailleurs :)
Vinber (2025-11-01 05:58:26+00:00): J'ai fait quelques commerces sur Bègles pour la gemme https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174032063#map=15/44.81033/-0.55653
wolfy1339 (2025-11-23 20:26:50+00:00): please don't blindly move the `place=*` tag to `border_type=*`, they require more nuance.

in quebec, there are no towns per say, only cities (ville).
And Quarters should most likely be borough, or neighbourghood according to its administrative status,
felipeeugenio (2025-09-09 12:59:04+00:00): Hola. Bienvenido a OSM Chile.
Gracias por sus ediciones.
No necesariamente todas las calles interiores de un condominio tienen el nombre del condominio. A veces simplemente no tienen nombre. Eso se puede verificar con la dirección de las casas interiores.
Por favor no agregar nombres descriptivos.
Saludos
zorrigas (2025-09-09 13:46:51+00:00): El nombre de la calle es el correcto (ej Los Silos o Los Nogales)