piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
RLakhani (2025-09-01 19:21:48+00:00): Again, that is for tab *different* village near Zafarwal which is in the same district Narowal, but is *not* this place.

This is a religious complex, that is not what a town is.  Please read and reread what a town actually means. There’s no place in the world where a mosque, temple, or church are in and of themselves considered to be an entire town. I don’t know why You are so adamant about making the map inaccurate.

It does not matter that there is a Wikipedia article that incorrectly identifies a religious complex as a town. It is still not a town and using your own eyes and satellite imagery you can see that this is not  a town. You keep calling this area of town, but it does not meet the criteria of it and is not in the Pakistan census as a town. Even with the population of 1547, mistaking the other village for a town is nonsensical. 

And you can search for the Gurdwara even if it’s not a town. Type in Badshahi Mosque - why do you see a result for it when it is not classified as a town?

And again, the Condor does not connect to town. It connects a temple to a border reception center. That is it.

The major difference between Russia and Ukraine is that those roads were previously open to road traffic. This instead was a road *specifically* built only recently just to connect a temple to a reception centre in India. Civilian traffic has never crossed the border for points onward. Indians cannot go any further into Pakistan. And I don’t think Pakistani can even cross the border into the Indian reception center site. So that is not a calid comparison.

And it’s called guru Nani Highway, do you think the Democratic Republic of Korea is considered a democracy? The name doesn’t matter. You have to tone down your emotions, use logic, and stop falsifying information on this map.
RLakhani (2025-09-01 19:25:15+00:00): BTW Russia only closed the borders with Ukraine August 1 which had been open to Ukrainians returning to Ukraine: https://newsukraine.rbc.ua/news/russia-closes-20-border-crossings-with-ukraine-1753730863.html
RLakhani (2025-09-01 19:55:55+00:00): "And it is certainly not just a service road. Pakistanis have been alllowed to go to the border and back. Pedestrians have been to walk from the border to the complex and back."

They can go to the border (as they can basically everywhere else along the Punjab border) and back because it is a road purposely built to connect the temple with the Indian border reception centre. 

The fact that you realize they can go "to" the border but cannot actually cross it demonstrates my point: This is not in anyway a secondary road that connects two cities or even two villages. It is just a road recently built to connect a temple to an Indian border reception centre. Unlike wagah, Pakistanis are not allowed to step foot across the border, and Indians cannot use this border to go anywhere else in Pakistan except for the temple complex. They cannot enter even the villages right next to the temple.
Jacksonville (2025-09-01 21:51:37+00:00): Yes, I understand that the road was built recently, but it was not built as a service road, but as a highway. They built this highway with the possibility that there might be two-way traffic.

If you look at the original models of the complex, there were supposed to be two border terminals, and pilgrims from India have a seperate car parks so that they can drive all way to the Kartarpur Corridor. 

The highway has been built. The road access doesn't affect the road classification. That is the ground situation. Tomorrow they could state that it is a fully-fledged border crossing, but it would still be the same highway. The road didn't change. 

You don't change the roads, just because of politics, because politics changes all the time.

You stated the news about the Ukraine-Russian borders, yet what you fail to realise is that the highways are still classified as highways.
Jacksonville (2025-09-01 21:54:01+00:00): In that same way, this is a highway that links two major towns – Kartarpur and Dera Baba Nanak.

You should bear this in mind that Guru Nanak Highway links to a Primary road on one side, and it links to a G.T Road on the other. The road that links the other two cannot be a "service road".
Taya_S (2025-09-21 12:19:05+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172242708
eggie (2025-08-31 08:11:31+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback Alleen een naam doet niets in OSM Voeg ook de aard van het bedrijf toe. office=it ? 
Gebruik de adresnode om op bij te taggen.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-08-31 08:16:16+00:00): Aangepast
Linus W Frische (2025-09-19 07:46:42+00:00): Har du fået tilladelse fra elcykelforum.dk til at benytte dem som datakilde?
Jacksonville (2025-08-31 17:12:15+00:00): RLakhani, please behave with your border edits. The political situation doesn't change the status of a road.
RLakhani (2025-08-31 21:29:57+00:00): This response is nonsensical and condescending. Worse, it is inaccurate. The political situation absolutely affects the status of a road. What was once a functional highway with cross border traffic now only sees rare crossings of foreign-registered vehicles because of the poor political situation. Don’t introduce emotions into what is meant to be a map based on fact.
Jacksonville (2025-09-01 12:22:10+00:00): It isn't emotions though. OSM works on on the ground situation - and the ground situation is that cars can go through the spectator side. I have also crossed this border myself - motorbikes cross the gate and then take a right from the X-ray side, whereas cars go straight onto the roundabout. 

On top of several borders around the world are closed, but that hasn't affected their road classification on OSM, the same applies here. 

One thing I don't understand is that, if you know that people can cross borders from here, regardless of how light the traffic is why you would still change it to a footpath. 

This affects the navigation systems and their maps that rely on OSM, like TomTom and Apple Maps, to name a few. This is G T Road and needs to remain as such.
RLakhani (2025-09-01 19:12:28+00:00): I agreed already that cars do go through this border - you don’t need to elaborate.

What is an example of a closed border where the classification remains of a high capacity major roadway? 

Navigation is the reason that this need to be an accurate map. If a Pakistani types in directions from Lahore and Amritsar, and gets a route that makes it seem like you can just drive through the border, this is incorrect. That’s why I had to go in and change the values for who can cross because it previously said it was open to all.
Jacksonville (2025-09-01 21:41:09+00:00): I didn't see the response for that, so I do appreciate it. 

In regards to the navigation, OSM is an offline map. It's up to the users to actually check the political situation and see whether borders are open or not. Otherwise, can go all the way to the gate, on the road that is known as. GT Road.

If you look at any Ukraine-Russia border (such as the one at 50.335699, 36.282708), the road classification is still a highway, however the road access has been set to no.

If a foreign tourist can drive from Europe to India, through Pakistan, through the Wagah border and OSM Maps or any of the navigation models should be able to display that route.
Jacksonville (2025-09-01 21:45:02+00:00): I can somewhat understand that other Indo-Pak crossings should typically have their access set to no, but on this particular crossing, I do think there should be full access. However, the road classifications shouldn't just change due to geopolitics.
Lola Fox (2026-07-03 06:55:33+00:00): Ciao. Sei sicuro che questo luogo è una vecchia fattoria abbandonata? Io credo siano semplicemente case abbandonate di un piccolo insediamento montano (abitazioni isolate abbandonate) ad uso residenza, fatto salvo le normali attività agricole di cui vivevano quasi tutte le case di una volta (l'orto di casa). In questa zona non vi erano attività agricole, ma se mai attività legate alla raccolta e macinatura delle castagne (vedi i vari ex mulini della zona).
custodiankeyy (2025-08-31 17:02:29+00:00): depot=metro etiketi doğru bir kullanım mı? Taginfo üzerinde sadece 5 kullanım bulunmakta. Önceki seferde de bu sebepden dolayı değişikliği geri almıştım.
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2025-08-31 17:54:54+00:00): depot=metro etiketi bana da doğru gelmedi. OpenStreetMap Viki'sinde zaten bunun için landuse=railway+railway=depot önerilmiş ve depot=metro'dan daha fazla kullanılmış. Türkiye'de Ankara'da da metro ve hafif raylı sistemlerin depolandığı alanlar landuse=railway+railway=depot ile etiketlenmiş.

@yiğit ege. Yine de depot=metro etiketinin olması gerektiğini düşünüyorsanız lütfen şu sayfayı okuyunuz:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Any_tags_you_like

Gerçekten gerekliyse böyle bir etiket türetmek de mümkün(bağlantıdaki sayfada yazanlara uyduktan sonra).
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2025-08-31 17:55:41+00:00): landuse=railway+railway=depot un önerildiği sayfa: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aindustrial%3Ddepot
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2026-01-20 22:24:51+00:00): @Demiryolu␣Yiğit 5 aydır cevap vermediğiniz için etiketi tekrar landuse=railway 'e çevirdim(railway=depot da ekleyerek). 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177497492
Jacksonville (2025-08-31 17:20:03+00:00): Road crosses do take place from the spectator seating. Cars and Motorcycles have crossed, even after 2019.
Jacksonville (2025-08-31 17:22:22+00:00): See the following videos:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=utjXTssUaqs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1LnYZdcOT5o
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j3k4rS6vdkE
RLakhani (2025-08-31 21:27:38+00:00): Only foreign registered vehicles can cross - a rarity. But you’re technically right in this regard
osm-user12 (2025-11-01 17:08:49+00:00): Hi, wenn der Steinbachweg wie Du schreibst nicht erkennbar und unpassierbar ist: Warum weist Du ihm dann in diesem Kontext unsinnige Attribute zu? tracktype=grade2 und surface=dirt sagen ja schließlich was ganz anderes aus.
kabelhaai (2025-09-02 19:58:46+00:00): Merci
bxl-forever (2025-09-02 22:13:57+00:00): You are welcome.
Jrachi (2025-09-01 07:07:35+00:00): Ciao.
Hai interrotto una relazione di un percorso escursionistico a catasto nazionale.
iD ti avrà sicuramente avvisato quando hai caricato le modifiche?
Hai cancellato circa 100 metri di sentiero, la frana è così estesa?
È veramente impossibile passare?
Ti ricordo che esistono i tag obstacle e sac_scale che si possono usare prima di cancellare una way!
Ti prego di rispondere in giornata.
Avendo interrotto un percorso a catasto, se non ho indicazioni ulteriori, ho poche scelte:
1- fare un revert e aggiungere un nodo con obstacol=landslide. E avvisare la SOSEC della necessità di un soppralluogo
2- fare il revert e ripristinare com'era prima.

Ivo
Palex63 (2025-09-01 07:37:26+00:00): Si sono passato sabato e non c'è più la strada,in paese mi hanno detto che è già da più di un anno.
Palex63 (2025-09-01 10:06:24+00:00): Hanno già fatto modifiche con le ruspe e la strada non sarà più riaperta.Ho modificato per evitare che altri debbano tornare indietro come ho fatto io
Jrachi (2025-09-01 10:52:20+00:00): "Le ruspe hanno modificato la strada!?
Scusa ma non era un sentiero?
Sei sicuro che sia stato chiuso anche per i pedoni?
Eri forse in bici?

Ivo
Palex63 (2025-09-01 11:54:14+00:00): È una strada carrabile fino all' interruzione, costeggia vigneti e noccioleti.Dove è franata la collina ha completamente chiuso la strada e con i lavori che hanno fatto non hanno liberato per continuare il sentiero ma hanno fatto una discesa che costeggia le coltivazioni.Il sentiero che continuava fino all' asfalto che scende a Rodello è definitivamente interrotto sia a piedi che con qualsiasi mezzo.Ho parlato con gente di Montelupo e hanno detto che è più di un anno che non si passa più.Poi per me puoi anche ripristinarlo sulla mappa ma se non hai le ali non passi.
Jrachi (2025-09-01 12:36:27+00:00): Grazie. Queste sono informazioni utili.
Lascio l'interruzione e avviso la SOSEC del problema.
Purtroppo si tratta di un percorso di oltre 30 km, rilevato da un progettista oltre 15 anni fa e andrà rivisto completamente.
Probabilmente quel passaggio verrà eliminato e credo sarà fatto passare da Montelupo Albese.

Ivo
Jrachi (2025-09-01 07:00:20+00:00): Ciao.
Sei sicuro che quel sentiero abbia quel nome?
Non inizia con al maiuscola, ed i nomi in italiano iniziano sempre con la maiuscola.
Non sembra nemmeno lontanamente ad un nome proprio.
È simile al nome dato dai biker:
mtb:name=La berria
Presente da tre anni!

Ivo
Palex63 (2025-09-01 07:45:30+00:00): Il Berria è il ruscello,il sentiero è un tratto con almeno una ventina di piccoli guadi che lo attraversano.Mettendo il nome è molto più rintracciabile da chi consulta le mappe perché è in una zona abbastanza difficile da trovare.
dp7 (2025-09-01 13:03:26+00:00): Ciao. In questo caso andrebbe mappato il ruscello e andrebbe dato il nome alla sua highway. Assegnare il nome al sentiero non è formalmente corretto.
Palex63 (2025-09-01 13:29:06+00:00): È talmente piccolo adesso che acqua c'è n'è poca, è più un rigagnolo ma molto lungo e caratteristico da fare a piedi e in MTB con una ventina di guadi poco profondi con classiche pietre e rocce di fiume in mezzo al bosco.Da far conoscere a chi non è della zona.Mettendo il nome magari qualcuno in più ci passa.Se invece non si può mettere il nome cancellatelo.
Jrachi (2025-09-01 13:50:54+00:00): Sembra che il tuo problema sia di vedere quel nome sulle mappa generalistiche!
Usa le mappe dedicate a mtb!
E cancella quel finto nome!

Ivo
dp7 (2025-09-01 15:46:59+00:00): Capisco il tuo intento ma ci sono delle regole a cui tutti dobbiamo cercare di attenerci. Il fatto che non ci sia acqua perenne è abbastanza normale e in quel caso puoi usare il tag "intermittent", anche se di fatto non indispensabile perchè fossi e torrenti nella maggior parte dei casi lo sono per definizione.
Mettendo il nome (quello vero) sul corso d'acqua ottieni comunque il tuo risultato e lo fai in maniera corretta. Poi possiamo interrogarci su quanto sia bene portare più gente negli ambienti naturali, ma questa è un'altra storia... ;-)
Se hai bisogno di una mano con la mappatura del torrente, fa sapere.
Myazyk (2025-08-31 13:17:14+00:00): Мікрорайон - не "м/н", а "мкрн."
kamasytrix (2025-08-31 19:17:00+00:00): якщо вже правильно, то взагалі в українській мові не можна скорочувати це слово
Myazyk (2025-08-31 19:35:50+00:00): Не можна скорочувати якщо це є частина власної назви.
Так само не можна скорочувати пседоніми
vasony (2025-09-05 20:07:24+00:00): Szia!

A házszám végére nem szükséges pont, köszi.

Tamás
Taya_S (2025-09-21 12:19:06+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172242708
mcliquid (2025-09-01 12:54:30+00:00): Hi and thank you for your contribution!

Please note for the future: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
WWMapper101 (2025-09-17 12:34:52+00:00): Unnecessary comment. A bounding box this size is needed for changes like this, especially ones in Russia
acubens71 (2025-08-31 16:18:04+00:00): Bonjour,

Il est inutile d'ajouter ce tag contrairement à ce que suggère iD, voir : https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/8507

Cordialement
eggie (2025-08-31 09:20:11+00:00): Dag Victor  , Je maakt van het Lucasbolwerk een highway=residential. Waarom is dat?
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=171258427

Het lijkt mij onzin en stopt de routering voor auto verkeer.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-08-31 09:25:02+00:00): Ik heb voetpad weer omgezet naar residential. Geef svp aan in je 'comment' wat je aanpast. Voor mijn hardlooprondje zegt niemand iets.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-08-31 09:26:09+00:00): Typo Je maakt van het Lucasbolwerk van een residential een footway?
Waarom? Voor je hardlooprondje?
Victorvk (2026-01-05 10:36:01+00:00): Hi Eggie, als ik iets verstoor is dat niet de bedoeling, ik wilde alleen een stuk voetpad toevoegen zodat de looproute ter plekke logischer is. Ikwas me niet bewust van het omzetten van een residentiële naar een footway. Sorry.
eggie (2026-01-05 10:39:45+00:00): No problem... Het routeert weer. 😀
JE_English (2025-09-05 20:11:59+00:00): Thank you!
pitfire (2025-08-31 10:35:14+00:00): Hallo moevh89,

danke für Deine Änderung, aber da hast Du eine Trassenverschiebung, vermutlich unbeabsichtigt eingebaut.
Schau Dir das bitte nochmals an.
VG pitfire
moevh89 (2025-08-31 11:16:25+00:00): Hallo pitfire,

entschuldige bitte, das war in der Tat nicht beabsichtigt. Ich wollte nur den Namen des Wegs korrigieren und den Naturfreundegarten ergänzen.

Vg
moevh89
berndw (2025-09-01 06:56:02+00:00): Hallo, auch von mir ein Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap

Wie ist denn die Beschilderung vor Ort?

Laut ALKIS ist das weiterhin die Bergheimer Straße bis 300 Meter nördlich des Vilicher Bach und sollte zumindest als highway=service erfasst werden

Ich kann auch auf meinen Bildern vom letzten Jahr kein Schild mit Naturfreundeweg erkennen. Ich kann mir auch nicht vorstellen, das die Stadt Bonn eine Straße aufteilt für einen Verein.

Wenn das also nur eine interne, lokale oder private  Benennung ist, sollte das auch entsprechend erfasst werden.

Für solche Änderungen solltest Du dich mit dem Namensschema im Wiki beschäftigen.
mtmail (2025-09-01 11:57:05+00:00): Auf https://naturfreundebonn.de/wir-ueber-uns/kontakt/ steht auch nur "Anschrift des Naturfreundegartens
Ecke Bergheimer Str. / Gensemer Str."
berndw (2025-09-01 12:35:21+00:00): Vielen Dank für die Info, dann werde ich das hier entsprechend korrigieren.

Den Garten kann ich nachvollziehen, der ist auf den Mapillarybildern zu erkennen.
osmviborg (2025-08-31 09:48:57+00:00): Slet samtlige tag og tilføj 'disused:shop=yes'
Taya_S (2025-08-31 10:39:01+00:00): I was in this town last week. There definitely is an open bicycle store here, though I recall it having a different name. cycle Something gråsten. I did not record the name at that time.
osmviborg (2025-08-31 10:47:47+00:00): Yes, now https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1431286400
pavvv (2025-08-31 10:02:42+00:00): 1. Czy ta zmiana była przedyskutowana? Nie, ponieważ była oponowana przez większość. Jest to zatem wandalizm.
2. Pozostawiłeś tagi typu argicultural, itd., które na zwykłych drogach są raczej zbędne i mało przydatne.
Yunkers (2025-08-31 10:40:05+00:00): Zmiana na trunk również nie była przedyskutowana. To była moja samowolka (choć wykonana rękami innego użytkownika). 
Propozycja mówiła również o tym że jest to zmiana "do pierwszego sprzeciwu". Sprzeciw był, więc musiała zostać przeprowadzona.
Jedyny problem jest taki że została przeprowadzona o 2 miesiące za późno.
pavvv (2025-08-31 11:13:47+00:00): Nie była samowolka, bo większość społeczności była ZA i nie było ani jednego głosu przeciw.

> Propozycja mówiła również o tym że jest to zmiana "do pierwszego sprzeciwu"

Gdzie tak było napisane?
Yunkers (2025-08-31 11:21:24+00:00): Myślę że lepiej będzie dopracować metodę głosowania i kryteria niż marnować czas nad dyskusją o martwej propozycję której nikt nie chce. 
Co jest zresztą kolejnym powodem dla którego wycofanie jest słuszne. Dane na osm muszą być poprawne. Nie mogą być "być może za dwa miesiące będą poprawne".
pavvv (2025-08-31 11:25:03+00:00): Przecież dane są poprawne według pewnej interpretacji. Jeżeli te drogi pozostaną trunk, to łatwiej je będzie przemianować na access_control=full albo expressway=yes. Dlatego te akurat drogi są błędne, a np. obwodnica Inowrocławia już nie?
Yunkers (2025-08-31 11:37:47+00:00): Gdyby dane to były poprawne to nie musiałbym poprawiać kilkunastu fragmentów.
Nikt nie sprawdzał trójzakazów, wjazdów z lasów, długości odcinków. Nikt nie aktualizował dróg do zmienianych zasad. 
Zmiany były przeprowadzone na tyle niedbale że wywalenie wszystkiego to lepsza opcja.
pavvv (2025-08-31 11:41:02+00:00): Szczegółowych zasad jeszcze nie ustalono. Zmiany zostały przeprowadzone zgodnie z pierwotnymi, a teraz jeśli chcemy zmieniać coś jeszcze w jakościowym, to przeprowadźmy głosowanie, czy w ogóle chcemy jakościowe.
Yunkers (2025-08-31 11:43:32+00:00): Niestety. Zmiany nie były przeprowadzone nawet zgodnie z tymi pierwotnymi. Ale widzę że też nigdy nie przeglądałeś trunków to nawet o tym nie wiesz.
Jeśli chcesz powrotu trunków, to najpierw przeprowadź dokładną analizę zasad i zmienionych odcinków i możemy wrócić do rozmowy :)
Yunkers (2025-08-31 12:20:08+00:00): (obwodnica Inowrocławia nie jest poprawna, po prostu jej nie zauważyłem. Zaraz pójdzie reverty i tego)
theDM (2025-09-05 22:07:43+00:00): Ten fragment kwalifikował się pod oba kryteria i ma parametry jak ekspresówka, tylko nie jest tak oznakowany. Oznaczenie tego jako trunk było prawidłowe.
Yunkers (2025-09-06 09:45:16+00:00): Hej. Nie rozpatrywalem które są poprawne a które nie. Być może można puścić na forum temat które trunki powinny wrócić ale nie wiem czy jest na to dobry czas.
theDM (2025-09-06 10:15:25+00:00): Powinny wrócić te, które kwalifikują się pod oba kryteria. Na pierwszy rzut przychodzą mi DK 16, poza nią DTŚ (podobno natężenie porównywalne do A4). Nie wiem, jak z DK 61 w Warszawie. Trasa Siekierkowska jako zamiennik wschodniej obwodnicy Warszawy też była ok.
Yunkers (2025-09-07 08:28:46+00:00): Myślę że takie drogi powinny raczej być takimi które zaczynają się i kończą na motorway/trunk. Żeby dziur nie robić.
Możesz rzucić temat jeśli masz czas. Temat trunków ucichł, głosowanie to ma małe szanse że się odbędzie. Może coś z tego będzie.
eggie (2025-08-31 09:42:59+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback .. Meestal zijn tweewielers uitgesloten van oneway=yes. Is dat hier het geval?
Dan toevoegen oneway:bicycle=no en evt ook voor moped en mofa
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
gabro00 (2025-09-01 19:59:23+00:00): Szia! A Kálvin téren dupla lett:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13110146853
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4970394324
OSM KAMI (2025-09-01 20:20:47+00:00): Oh elnézést, mobilon nem jelent meg, vagy nem vettem észre. Töröld kérlek,  vagy majd én törlöm.
Trafford_Mapper (2025-08-31 09:33:59+00:00): *Metroline Manchester not Metrolink
NieWnen (2025-08-31 12:57:33+00:00): O, no i wygląda lepiej :P
Dawid2849 (2025-08-31 11:41:15+00:00): Na węzłach Trasy Siekierkowskiej z Wałem Miedzeszyńskim oraz Trasy Siekierkowskiej z Ostrobramską zrobił się bałagan z kategoriami
Yunkers (2025-08-31 11:50:53+00:00): Ach, no tak. Sam przecież zmieniałem te węzły. Poprawie gdy tylko znajdę momencik. Dzięki za spostrzegawczość.
Yunkers (2025-08-31 12:54:46+00:00): Done :)
NorthCrab_upload (2025-08-31 09:51:01+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12404246979

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
businessesMan (2025-09-25 23:23:10+00:00): Moin bastibay, 
du hast hier die Baustellen der Straßen geändert, dabei ist die Situation vor Ort weiterhin wie vorher. Worauf basieren deine Änderungen bitte?
Beste Grüße
bastibay (2025-09-26 04:22:33+00:00): Wenn jemand meint, in OSM temporäre und kurzfristige Baustellen darstellen zu müssen, dann muss er sich aber auch um die Aktualisierung kümmern.
Siehe:
https://plan.tomtom.com/de?p=53.57536,9.95666,15.76z&q=Hamburg