piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2023-04-23 15:53:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2023-02-28 20:52:52+00:00): نرجوا منكم عدم إضافة أماكن غير صحيحة
emersonveenstra (2023-02-25 17:38:47+00:00): Reverted for vandalism, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132978734
wille (2023-02-28 23:01:51+00:00): Olá, tudo bem? Onde você encontrou os nomes desses viadutos?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132981880
user_18541240 (2023-02-28 23:32:49+00:00): Meu irmão mora no local e me passou algumas correções !!!!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132981880
Nomes e Ruas (2023-03-01 00:23:05+00:00): Boa noite, os viadutos foram corrigidos, com os nomes verdadeiros, por "Endereços e lugares" corretamente.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132981880
wille (2023-03-01 12:22:30+00:00): Obrigado pelas informações. Além de não haver nenhuma placa indicando o nome no local, não encontrei nenhuma referência a esse nome no google: https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22viaduto%20leal%20borges%22
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132981880
emersonveenstra (2023-02-25 17:38:45+00:00): Reverted for vandalism, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132978734
emersonveenstra (2023-02-24 23:14:12+00:00): Hi,

Looks like you added a way with no tags here, i think it's supposed to be a swimming pool? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1149255660
jessbeutler (2023-02-25 00:38:33+00:00): What a silly mistake! That wasn't meant to be uploaded but I fixed the tagging. Thank you for catching that and kindly pointing out my error. 

Happy Mapping! :)
emersonveenstra (2023-02-25 18:19:00+00:00): No problem, thanks for fixing it!
GustavoE (2023-03-08 20:38:07+00:00): Hola, con respecto a este cambio de nombre, el nuevo Parque Nacional Salar de Huasco corresponde a la re-categorización del área del denominado "Bien Nacional Protegido Salar de Huasco" y no al vigente Santuario de la Naturaleza del mismo nombre mencionado. Estos son los decretos correspondientes que demuestran las modificaciones al área protegida: https://bcn.cl/3c5sx,  https://bcn.cl/39i19,  https://bcn.cl/2tclp
notomoro (2023-02-24 20:05:12+00:00): Looks good, can you add the other roads?
paganella31 (2023-02-25 10:00:09+00:00): Ciao! Vedo che hai usato highway=trunk, immagino sia un errore di battitura per highway=track. Potresti correggere? Grazie
Andrea1968 (2023-02-26 09:25:44+00:00): @paganella31 Ciao, a dire il vero a me sembrava il naturale proseguimento del tratto precedene: una strada anche se non in buone condizioni e in disuso.  Non metterei path.  Cosa suggerisci?
paganella31 (2023-02-26 12:08:56+00:00): Non volevo contestare la scelta tra track e path, anche perché non ho presente come è sul posto la way aggiunta. Semplicemente mi sono accorto che hai usato trunk (superstrada) invece di track (strada forestale) immagino per sbaglio, tutto qui. Comunque vedo che è già stata corretta da JuaFritz.
Andrea1968 (2023-02-26 16:06:24+00:00): @paganella31 Scusa, avevo letto troppo velocemente e non avevo colto il tuo suggerimento. In effetti era uno sbaglio. Grazie
tomhukins (2023-03-08 22:58:28+00:00): Hi, I assume https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/317749709 is mistakenly tagged as building=yes
dudone (2023-03-10 11:02:50+00:00): Hi  Many thanks for spotting this.  Must have had this still selected when tagging another building.  Now fixed.
Dudley
emersonveenstra (2023-02-25 17:38:42+00:00): Reverted for vandalism, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132978734
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-27 08:44:13+00:00): Definitely review what the ai is suggesting since it isn't always right.  One of these buildings is way off.
VLD175 (2023-02-28 15:18:35+00:00): Hello CurlingMan13, 

 Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I had aligned the new building polygons to Mapbox satellite imagery, and see now that the structures have changed in the newer imageries. I’ve updated the buildings here and will double check against newer imageries to the best of my ability going forward.
conradoos (2023-03-05 16:18:30+00:00): Nie doklejaj obszarów zagospodarowania terenu (trawa, drzewa) do ścieżek, tak  jak to zrobiłeś tutaj https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1149263747 i tutaj https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1149263718. Obecnie trawa i drzewa wchodzą na drogę.
conradoos (2023-03-05 16:21:59+00:00): A ten budynek https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1149263741 to nie jest garaż.
Izokzi (2023-03-06 17:17:52+00:00): Zostało już to poprawione.
eggie (2023-02-25 11:03:34+00:00): Beste Xyberion.. Wanneer dan op het verder verloop bicycle=use_sidepath staat gaat dat niet meer routeren voor fietsers. Ik zal het aanpassen.
Gr eggie
eggie (2023-02-25 11:07:21+00:00): bicycle:forward=use_sidepath toegevoegd.
Dat gaat dat over dat stukje waarvanaf het oostelijke fietspad afsplitst. Da zal de reden zijn dat het niet routeerde zie ik nu.
Het zal dus nu correct moeten routeren straks.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-02-25 11:10:34+00:00): Het de voorgaande mapper ingeseind.
eggie (2023-02-25 11:43:45+00:00): Aan de noordzijde van de kruising routeert het ook niet vanuit het noorden.
Die fout moet er ook al een tijd inzitten.
eggie (2023-02-25 11:54:32+00:00): De routering hersteld. Nooit gemerkt dat de routering hier de fout in ging.
Denk dat de Hoekse Waard wel een check nodig heeft m bv de Open Fiets Map, want OSRM en GrapHopper negeren de gewoon use_sidepath zie ik nu.
eggie (2023-02-25 12:03:48+00:00): ... en de andere 'boosdoener' :)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127351270#map=14/51.7738/4.4491
Xyberion (2023-02-28 15:33:10+00:00): Hoi Eggie,

Kan ik ergens terug zien, wat ik precies heb aangepast en hoe de situatie daarvoor was. Ik dacht hier namelijk goed te hebben opgelet op de use_sidepath tags, maar heb er dus ergens een over het hoofd gezien. Daarnaast vind ik het lastig in deze changesets mijn daadwerkelijke aanpassingen terug te vinden. 

Groet,
Wouter
eggie (2023-02-28 16:28:30+00:00): https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=132983441

Wouter. Je had het goed gedaan, maar het haalde niets uit, want de fout zit in het volgende stukje naar het zuiden.
Nu met bicycle:forward=use_sidepath
Dus van noord naar zuid routeert  het, maar van zuid naar noord wordt je het fietspad opgedwongen.
Aan de noordzijde had een andere mapper niet opgelet door het fietspad in te korten, maar was vergeten bicycle=use_sidepath te verwijderen.
Komend weekend even testen met de openfietsmap, want die osmr en graphhopper negeren use_sidepath.

Als je die link van achavi ergens opslaat bij je favorieten dan hoef je alleen maar steeds het changeset nummer in te vullen en kun je je eigen edits checken. 

Groet
eggie
eggie (2023-02-28 16:29:58+00:00): grrrr  typo 'word je'
eggie (2023-02-28 16:34:10+00:00): Hier is trouwen een 'leuke' dat de N489 Smidsweg heet en de ventweg Smitsweg met een 't'... wat dan gewoon weer klopt. Dat wordt steeds maar 'verbeterd',  maar het is gewoon goed hier.
eggie (2023-03-04 06:54:46+00:00): ...   en het routeert weer sinds vandaag op de OFM  :)
Groet
eggie
AntiCompositeNumber (2024-08-25 19:24:32+00:00): Hi, I reverted this changeset because it added bus route tags to a forest multipolygon. There may be an error in whatever tool you used to edit this relation.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155752480
emersonveenstra (2023-02-25 17:38:40+00:00): Reverted for vandalism, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132978734
CurlingMan13 (2024-06-14 02:55:47+00:00): You should not have changed this tag....

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dcamp_pitch

Changeset reverted in part or full.
iandees (2023-03-08 05:35:01+00:00): On what basis are you changing this downtown area to a religious landuse?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-11 00:56:24+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9423477444/history has brand:wikidata = Q3751637 that was added in this edit
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q3751637 from brand:wikidata=Q3751637 (brand:wikipedia=en:CajaSur) link company that does not exist anymore

brand:wikidata=Q20013689 and brand:wikipedia=es:CajaSur Banco
 may be more fitting
they are linking https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/CajaSur_Banco and https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q20013689
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:10:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
scarapella (2023-05-23 14:09:49+00:00): hi t2editme,

For the 3 ways that are part of the Jay Dam Multi-polgygons I think that you meant to make the roles outer rather than inner.

-scarapella
Palolo (2023-02-25 22:43:31+00:00): Thank you for contributing to the map in Tanzania. Please make sure to accurately trace each building and create square corners. Use the q key. Thanks
Glassman (2023-02-26 19:00:12+00:00): #TIP: square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132984923
amadvance (2023-02-26 16:47:01+00:00): Ciao Andrea,

Ho visto che hai tolto i campi name=. Ma queste sono piste di un bike park vero e proprio (e vietate ai pedoni), e quindi il nome mtb è anche il nome proprio della pista. 

Dato che la documentazione openstreetmap dice di usare mtb:name per i nomi non ufficiali, direi che in questo caso il campo name= andava bene.

Va bene se sistemo io ?

Ciao,
Andrea (omonimo)
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-25 09:19:56+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/781343308

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
letsridebikes (2023-07-23 23:06:11+00:00): Hello, why did you set bicycle=no to various rural tracks and footpaths around the Stroudwater Navigation? I've been on a few survey walks and there's no signage to indicate a ban on cycling. Cotswold Canals Trust, the keepers of the Thames & Severn Way, are generally OK with considerate cycling, and it's in regular use on the Strava heat map? Thanks
run'n'ride (2023-07-24 19:30:49+00:00): Check OS mapping...these are marked as footpaths, so no right of way. I've been to look & signed as footpaths.
letsridebikes (2023-07-24 19:46:30+00:00): The presence of a legal right for walkers does not mean no access for other users. Permissive access exists.
letsridebikes (2023-07-25 06:26:06+00:00): So for example you would usually set foot=designated, designation=public_footpath. But as you've seen the ground truth may not be highway=footpath, it could be highway=track or highway=service like the driveway in St. Andrew's Church, Whitminster I mentioned. In that case, other users like cars, bikes and horses have permissive usage. bicycle=no really only indicates a physical obstacle like a narrow kissing gate.
SomeoneElse (2023-08-16 23:55:23+00:00): For the avoidance of doubt, we aren't allowed to copy from OS maps that show rights of way.  Some councils have made this data available under a compatible licence (the overlay at https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#18/51.77215/-2.33899/O/P is an example of a map that shows that), but there isn't a current OS map that shows PRoWs with a suitable licence.
aixbrick (2023-02-25 09:22:37+00:00): Hallo,
die vorherige Erfassung war korrekt. Der Imbiss nutzt das gesamte Gebäude.
Gruß
aixbrick (2023-03-10 13:51:54+00:00): Keine Reaktion, rückgängig gemacht mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133519557.
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-27 08:27:37+00:00): This edit is being reverted.  Do not change correctly mapped residential roads into cartpaths.  This makes no sense, but feel free to elaborate on why this was done.
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-27 08:28:11+00:00): Reverted in:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133076201
woodpeck_repair (2023-03-03 00:51:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 133232206, 133232218, 133232224, 133232227, 133232225, 133232208, 133232216, 133232213, 133232177, 133232229, 133232203, 133232220, 133232198, 133232180, 133232189, 133224701, 133232215, 133232214, 133232188, 133232199, 133232207, 133232205, 133232182, 133232222, 133232186, 133232200, 133232191, 133232223, 133232209, 133232169, 133232230, 133232194, 133232197, 133232210 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import with unclear licensing in Madagascar
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-27 08:32:15+00:00): Do not change roadways that are already correctly mapped into cartpaths.  This damages the map and is not correct.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132985841
MxxCon (2023-02-25 04:09:01+00:00): Hello.
You made quiet a lot of edits to Kings Highway.
You really should've consulted with the local community before starting on this. While you were well intentioned, ultimately these changes are not correct.
As documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Dual_carriageway it explicitly states:
Roads are not to be mapped as dual carriageways if the two directions are only separated by paint. This includes single or multiple painted centre lines, hatched areas, channelized turn lanes, two-way turn lanes, by flush medians, or by any other means that is not a physical barrier to vehicles.

Plus your edits affected a large number of turn restrictions and bus line relations.

All this could've been avoided...
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132985854
Goffredo (2023-02-24 21:48:57+00:00): Buonasera,
benvenuto in OSM innanzi tutto.
Mi scuso per la seccatura ed il commento, ma sto notando che ultimamente ha rimosso i campi name dalle relazioni dei sentieri ed impoverito di informazioni il tag symbol e symbol:it.
Tali informazioni sono importanti e riguardano appunto la relazione del sentiero, e sono spesso concordate e fornite dal CAI o dal manutentore del sentiero stesso.
Posso chiedere il motivo di tale rimozione?
Vallio Enzo (2023-02-24 22:30:05+00:00): Buona sera.
MI è stato chiesto dal CAI di sistemare le etichette per il progetto infomond.
etichetta name mi hanno detto che va messa solo se esiste un nome ufficiale del percorso.
non volevo modificare nessuna traccia. Grazie per averla risistemata.
Goffredo (2023-02-26 15:03:01+00:00): Salve, grazie della risposta.
Non conoscevo il progetto Infomont, mi pare simile al Lonvia:
https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#?map=13.0/45.5995/10.2686

Capisco perfettamente, tuttavia la natura collaborativa di OSM mira alla creazione di un database, e le informazioni contenute sono utilizzate da moti altri servizi. OSM è il database, Infomont una loro visualizzazione, Lonvia un'altra, e così ce ne sono molte altre. Tag che non servono al CAI possono (ad esempio) servire ad altri consumatori, per questo motivo "togliere" informazioni con un contenuto sensato non è ben visto. Se il name fosse stato: "mio sentiero di domenica scorsa" l'avrei cancellato pure io, intendiamoci :-) .
Vallio Enzo (2023-02-26 18:33:22+00:00): Salve,
a me hanno dato le seguenti indicazioni
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:CAI
Buona serata
bspecht (2023-02-28 09:07:41+00:00): I don't think it makes sense to include the potential future concourse extension. There is no timeline or official design, likely more than a decade away.
-joshy- (2023-03-01 01:40:35+00:00): I agree, this really only serves to add confusion, and I'm struggling to even find a source on plans to extend the terminal further in the near future.
drlellinger (2023-03-08 09:15:48+00:00): Sorry also die korrigierten Gebäude in der Kellerstraße sind alles aber nicht korrigiert, alles verschoben nicht in Relation zu einander jetzt muss das wieder zurückverschoben werden
Rainero (2023-03-08 21:32:22+00:00): Auch sorry, ich wollte eigentlich nur die Geometriefehler (doppelte Punkte) beheben, habe die Gebäude aber in diesem Zustand vorgefunden: https://ibb.co/1vNm7gz

Servus,
Rainer
drlellinger (2023-03-09 09:40:11+00:00): Ah okay dann sollte es jetzt passen denk ich
kubahahaha (2023-05-21 23:22:35+00:00): Usunąłeś building z ośrodka Sargus i całkiem zniknął z mapy. Poprawiam
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3699994
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-27 08:26:32+00:00): Why did you change these residential roads into cartpaths?  They are very clearly roads and not cartpaths.
emersonveenstra (2023-02-28 12:27:37+00:00): Hi,

On https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1149288692 you put lanes:backward and lanes:forward on a oneway street, could you take a look and fix that? Thanks!
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-28 20:03:11+00:00): These should be added as golf cartpaths, not paths.
eggie (2023-02-25 10:17:37+00:00): Dag Dave.. Je vraagt feedback 
Tip Het beste kun je bestaande wegen ombouwen en niet eerst verwijderen. Anders gaat de historie verloren. 
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=132987159
MVG
eggie
HirschKauz (2023-02-25 09:15:46+00:00): Bitte Felder deren Wert man nicht weiß NIE!!! mit einem Fragezeichen ausfüllen!! Den Wert dann einfach nicht eingeben oder ein zusätzliches fixme=* eintragen wenn es dann nötig ist. Grüße.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132987327
opendcc (2023-02-25 08:53:08+00:00): Hallo,

bitte hier in der Gegend Bayern80 als Hintergrund verwenden, ist aktueller und genauer positioniert. Da steht z.B. mittlerweise ein Neubau an einer Stelle, wo Du noch eine Straße eingezeichnet hat.
Scout Jens (2023-02-25 11:56:32+00:00): Ups. Sorry. Ich schaue oft auch andere Luftbilder an, um so etwas zu vermeiden. Bing hat eine bessere Auflösung, aber Aktualität ist wichtiger. Kannst Du mir sagen welcher Weg? Dann passe ich noch einmal an.
opendcc (2023-02-25 17:50:35+00:00): schon erledigt ..
BaghdadiMapper (2023-04-17 11:12:32+00:00): Why did you move the mall tag from the landuse to the building? The mall includes the entire landuse area and not just the building, so it would make more sense to tag the entire landuse with the mall tags instead of just the building.
LockOnGuy (2023-04-17 12:09:33+00:00): Hi, Because the Mall is one building with retail stores inside of it according to the Baghdad investment commission rules. There is small like ice cream shop and minor stores outside yes but it might get removed just like what happened with Zayonna mall 2 years ago when they removed the walls, gates and the small shops and kept the building only.        
If you want to put the info tags in the landuse instead of the building it's your choice I don't mind if you see it the best to do.  Thanks.
BaghdadiMapper (2023-04-17 15:04:43+00:00): Thank you.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-25 09:19:51+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8260408588
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/755312699

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eggie (2023-02-25 19:03:48+00:00): Dag Dave.. Je vraagt feedback Je tekent vlakken parking over andere vlakken parking heen. Dat werkt niet.
Verder ligt het grote vlak parkeerplaats nu geheel uit het lood. Wat was je bedoeling?
Ik pas het weer even aan.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=132987746
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-02-25 19:13:06+00:00): Opgeplakte parkings verwijderd. Er is al een parkeerplaats ingetekend.
Groet
eggie
eggie (2023-02-25 19:17:36+00:00): Die parkeerplaats was al in het groot aanwezig. Ik heb 'm verwijderd.
Groet
eggie
Glassman (2023-02-25 06:40:44+00:00): according to king county these areas are close to the houses. but I agree that the original areas were too large. See king county imap, https://gismaps.kingcounty.gov/iMap/
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132988036
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-25 09:19:53+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/434852166
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1149301523

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-27 08:25:45+00:00): Please elaborate on why these roads were temporarily changed from cartpaths and back into residential roads?
ottwiz (2023-02-26 19:17:34+00:00): Wow, you did a lot of details to Hillsboro! Thanks for making this area look awesome
cyton (2023-02-25 10:29:39+00:00): für mein persönliches verständnis;
amenity=waste_basket + covered=yes bedeutet der mülleimer selber hat eine art deckel oder der mülleimer ist unter einer überdachung? ich tippe auf ersteres, könnte man aber auch falsch interpretieren.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132988907
SomeoneElse (2023-02-25 00:08:39+00:00): Hello again Wibblejunior,
What are you using as the source of this series of "Classification changes"?  Previously in OSM you made a number of these changes that really didn't make any sense (for example, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/77779903/history ).
It would really help for you to say a bit more about why you are making these changes, and to discuss these changes with other mappers.
Most local mapper chat probably happens via https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb , but there are other places such as the community forum https://community.openstreetmap.org that might be easier to use.
Last time, we never really got a response to why you were making these changes, despite attempts to get in touch like e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4799 and had to undo them.  We don't want to have to do that again, so please do provide a little more explanation.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
Nico D (2023-02-25 22:15:11+00:00): Hi there, do you speak Spanish by chance?
Anyway, I saw you tagged some ways as service roads on "Parque de Mayo" (this changed set is one of several).
The thing is, vehicles can't use those roads since last year. Only pedestrians and bikes can use them. In fact, the municipality put blockades to prevent vehicles from entering Parque de Mayo using those roads.

I understand that maybe the previous tagging was incorrect. However, I fear that this new tagging would route vehicles to enter and use Parque de Mayo using roads only for pedestrians.

There is this news:
https://www.lanueva.com/nota/2021-3-5-11-20-0-en-una-semana-se-habilita-el-transito-en-el-parque-de-mayo
with this picture:
https://px.cdn.lanueva.com/032021/1614953927288/lamian%20con%20arcada.png
where only the roads in dark blue and yellow can be used by vehicles.

Also, I live in this city, I have gone to the park recently, and I've seen the different types of barriers to stop vehicles from using the Alem/Cordoba entrance and the 12 de Octubre entrance. I should have tagged them too.

So, to sum up. What tag do you propose for the roads marked for pedestrians and bikes only?

Maybe I'm not up to date and something changed. What source did you use to map those ways as service roads?

Thanks.