piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
goodidea (2026-04-15 12:57:20+00:00): Hallo Lukas! Ich hab deine Nachricht heute erst gesehen … Ja, da könntest du recht haben – oder es ist ein schwieriger (Grenz-)Fall. Ich glaube nicht, dass es ein Versehen war, ich erinnere mich aber nicht mehr ganz genau. Die Fotos zeigen es wohl richtig (ich hab auch eins von 2021, sieht genauso aus), aber man kann daraus nicht klar ableiten, was es ist. Typisches (blankes) metal_grid ist es wohl nicht von der „obersten Oberfläche“ her gesehen. concrete oder asphalt stimmt aber ziemlich sicher auch nicht. Es könnte gut sein, dass es Metall ist (bzw. wirklich eine Art metal_grid!) mit einer Anti-Rutschbeschichtung, die wie Beton aussieht auf den Fotos. Es kann sein, dass ich 2023 metal_grid gesetzt hatte, weil der Weg daraus besteht (ob nun mit oder ohne dünne Beschichtung) und mir das als der am wenigsten falsche Wert erschien, also der am ehesten passende (ohne was Neues zu erfinden – was ich immer zu vermeiden versuche). Und weil concrete definitiv nicht gestimmt hat ... Meist bin ich da schon recht gründlich und schau es mir vor Ort an.

Was ich jetzt noch gesehen habe: nw520 hat 2024 bei einem Teilstück zur Treppe den (undokumentierten) Wert surface=anti-slip (mit surface:note=Metall mit Anti-Rutschbeklebung) gesetzt (weltweit nur 45x benutzt). Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/399937342. Aber den Hauptweg nicht geändert – was auch seltsam (und v.a. inkonsistent!) ist. Es ist sicherlich die gleiche Oberfläche. Da müsste man wohl nochmal hin ... Vielleicht kann man auch material=metal (oder metal_grid) und surface=anti-slip setzen? Oder surface=metal_grid + anti_slip=yes? ;-)

Vielleicht hast du ja eine Idee ... Bzw. kannst mir sagen, wie du es machen würdest.

Viele Grüße und danke für den Hinweis
goodidea (2026-04-15 13:27:00+00:00): Was ich gerade noch gesehen habe: Osmose zeigt eine Warnung an für surface=anti-slip auf dem kleinen Wegstück, das damit getaggt ist („Bad tag value|Concerns tag: 'surface=anti-slip'“) ...  Weil es undokumentiert ist? Oder wegen des Bindestrichs (mit Underscore wäre wohl besser, aber „anti_slip“ ist noch seltener  – nur 1x verwendet)? 

Nur zur Info ... das meinte ich aber damit, dass ich undokumentierte (oder neu erfundende) Werte nur ungern benutze.

Denn eigentlich müsste man es im Wiki dokumentieren (bzw. erst im Forum diskutieren?) und dann noch ein Issue für Osmose oder andere Validatoren anlegen etc. ...
:-} (2023-02-23 10:13:11+00:00): Większość obiektów jest niepoprawnie oznaczona
syntex (2023-02-23 20:26:06+00:00): Jakich obiektów
syntex (2023-02-24 10:26:15+00:00): No napisz jakie obiekty. W gminie Tarczyn około 10 lat temu użytkownik RuteX dodawał obiekty w ten sposób, że sklejał landuse z drogami, ciekami wodnymi i granicami. Zacząłem to poprawiać.
Map-Peter (2023-02-23 23:55:44+00:00): Hallo Xaver,
 
die alte Eisenbahnlinie war doch bereits mit korrektem Verlauf in OSM erfasst. Nun hast du da mehrere Haken in den Verlauf gemacht: https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=132898588 . Mit solchen Haken verlaufen aber keine Schienen - der Zug würde entgleisen.
 
:-(
 
Ich habe gerade umfangreich den gesamten Bereich angepasst - und mache da morgen Abend weiter.
  
Gruß Peter
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:12:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
Frans S (2023-03-01 13:13:15+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
Do not cluster buildings. Please check the import of buildings if they are all correct and not clustered.




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132898711
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-22 21:59:14+00:00): Please be more descriptive in your changeset comments.

What did you change/edit and why?
literan (2023-02-23 20:16:35+00:00): это не линки между дорогами, а начало дороги
user_610278 (2023-02-24 09:16:24+00:00): Спасибо. Видимо, у меня есть ещё несколько подобных некорректных атрибутов - постараюсь выявить самостоятельно.
literan (2023-02-24 10:37:36+00:00): обычно линки - на многоуровневых развязках. Или отдельные выделенные проезжие части, как здесь https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/55.91989/37.53953
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-23 03:23:52+00:00): These ways are perfectly valid.  They are mapped as driveways and should remain.

A ton of micro-details are commonly added, including manholes, pools, telephone poles, fences, steps, etc.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132899372
fabiotofy (2023-02-23 06:51:33+00:00): più che "name" (ufficiale) forse è un "loc_name" ? (nome di fatto)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132899730
borgofumo (2023-02-23 07:03:43+00:00): No, c'e' un cartello stradale tipo quelli che indicano le vie. Si vede bene anche con google street view:  https://www.google.it/maps/@46.0801231,13.2141606,3a,15y,207.05h,88.31t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1shjtvzApN_OjWZBY-XbU0Zg!2e0!7i16384!8i8192?hl=it
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132899730
Gabriele Dri (2023-03-10 20:07:45+00:00): Conosco bene la zona ma ci sono ripassato in zona la scorsa settimana. Sì, c'è il cartello stradale ad entrambi i lati del percorso ciclabile come se fosse il cartello della via, ma c'è scritto "Casa della studente | il Troi | nova domus utinensis", quindi è evidente (almeno per me) che sia più che altro una indicazione della casa della studente posta alla fine e non il nome del percorso in sé. Fosse per me io toglierei il nome da questa way
borgofumo (2023-03-10 20:20:39+00:00): Ok Gabriele, provvedi tu?
Fizzie-DWG (2023-02-26 03:43:07+00:00): Reverted by DWG for vandalism: changeset/133028369
map per (2023-03-14 09:19:37+00:00): Hallo Rainero,

hier (1) ist keine Touristinfo oder? (Das sieht eher nach amenity=reception_desk aus)

Danke und viele Grüße
map per

(1) https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9873254387
Rainero (2023-03-14 19:04:52+00:00): Hallo map per,

das stammt nicht von mir, ich habe nur die aufeinander liegenden Punkte vereinigt. Der originale Punkt war der: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9868238358/history
Es ist unschön, dass statt der Historie des POIs die des Gebäudepunkts weitergeführt wurde.  Aber ich gebe dir recht, dafür passt amenity=reception_desk besser.

Ich versuche mal mit dem undelete-Plugin die Historie des Punkts wiederherzustellen und die Änderung auf amenity=reception_desk kann ich dann gleich mit erledigen.

Viele Grüße,
Rainer
map per (2023-03-14 19:43:20+00:00): Super, danke!
bxl-forever (2023-02-26 08:43:11+00:00): Please do not add false information to the database!

"Marché aux Toiles" is only the name of a square.  Adding amenity=marketplace on it solely because of the name contains a magic word is plainly wrong and will mislead map users into thinking they can expect a real market here.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/116039984

Please make sure to review your edits carefully instead of creating huge changesets based on Osmose suggestions.

Look at this too:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/761711675/history
Changing "é" into "É" is nice but you are only applying mechanical edits without looking at the real problem.  The problem is that a small pond should not have a name in the first place.  It’s better to fix the mistake instead of just making the mistake look prettier.

Have a nice day.
Yaaaaaaaa (2023-03-01 13:50:16+00:00): hi again, same thing, I fixed both of them.
thx !
emersonveenstra (2023-02-23 17:44:50+00:00): Hi,

Did you mean to remove the building tag from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1116734073/history ?
Maxwell Dillivan (2023-02-23 19:48:57+00:00): Likely not!
emersonveenstra (2023-02-24 23:09:09+00:00): Okay, i fixed it
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-27 18:46:36+00:00): Looks like you accidentally disconnected two roadways.  please be more careful in your edits.  Thanks.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132900458
Frans S (2023-03-04 09:24:46+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not always in line with the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
Connect many times nodes of buildings to each other.
Square each rectangular building
Pay more attention on accurate mapping. Follow the roof lines. 
you cluster sometimes buildings.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132900610
CoyKoi (2023-02-24 01:13:07+00:00): The school was already mapped as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28791304
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132900659
clay_c (2023-04-19 21:04:09+00:00): Hi rayKiddy and thanks for contributing to this MapRoulette challenge! You weren't meant to edit any tracks beyond the one highlighted on MapRoulette. The track without service=* should have stayed that way, and this way should have been changed to service=siding: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/215932551

I've gone ahead and fixed these two tracks. Let me know if there's anything that might be unclear in the instructions.
Marc_ch (2023-02-24 00:43:58+00:00): Bonjour,
oü est-ce que cette opération de masse a-t-elle été discutée ?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Code_de_conduite_des_modifications_automatis%C3%A9es
En l'occurence je n'ai jamais entendu parlé de "Sun Store SA" comme marque. ca c'est éventuellement le nom de l'entreprise  (il y a un doute avec  Galenicare Management SA),tandis que  la marque me semble être "Sun Store"
Salutations,
Marc
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-23 01:14:22+00:00): Please do not delete features that exist.  These driveways clearly exist and should not be deleted.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132900951
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:11:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
Gonéo (2023-02-23 09:29:01+00:00): OK pour la modification, j'en ai profité pour corriger le carrefour avec un point de connexion unique pour la rue Anatole France qui était coupée en deux.
emersonveenstra (2023-02-23 17:39:23+00:00): Hi,

You created an invalid multipolygon with two open ends here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15521597 can you please fix this? Thanks!
Frans S (2023-03-03 17:41:28+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
The default tag for buildings = building=yes. 
Please use that tag when you map for HOTOSM
Best regards
eggie (2023-02-23 09:24:41+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback.. 
 

Wellicht shop=equestrian ? 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dequestrian

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-02-23 09:29:10+00:00): Aangepast en website toegevoegd
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-23 01:09:25+00:00): These should not be deleted and instead, a private tag should be added.  I have reverted this changeset and resolved it for you.

Paths, even restricted and private, are extremely important to Fire and Rescue.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132901353
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-23 01:10:31+00:00): Reverted in changeset:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132904623
TrekClimbing (2023-02-22 22:19:51+00:00): The other changesets:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132901745
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132901646
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132901628
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132901582
t_ja (2023-02-23 17:11:22+00:00): Pekne detailny popis :)
Vdaka, ze si si dal zalezat, lebo v takomto stave to asi ostane minimalne dalsich 10 rokov...
Tomas_J (2023-02-23 17:17:07+00:00): Idem podľa Dodkovej štatistiky, hlavne tam kde chýbajú popisné čísla úplne. Zdrojov je dosť ale maperov málo :)
TrekClimbing (2023-02-22 22:19:39+00:00): The other changesets:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132901745
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132901646
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132901628
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132901534
TrekClimbing (2023-02-22 22:19:23+00:00): The other changesets:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132901745
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132901646
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132901582
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132901534
kdwyatt401 (2023-03-17 12:40:07+00:00): Northwest Park
TrekClimbing (2023-02-22 22:19:01+00:00): The other changesets:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132901745
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132901628
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132901582
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132901534
DaveTO (2023-04-27 17:41:22+00:00): Hi Nate! Can you elaborate on why Allen Rd was tagged as bicycle=no south of Sheppard? My understanding is that it is a secondary road (i.e. not an expressway) until its intersection with Traffic Rd further south, which means that cycling is legally allowed, and that's what OSM means by "bicycle=no".

User https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/dvandersluis and I are having a conversation about whether bicycle=no is appropriate in this section of the Allen Rd or not, so your input would be appreciated.

Cheers!

David

Cheers!

David
Nate Wessel (2023-04-27 22:10:00+00:00): Hmmm. I just took a look at the change history, and I don't think I was the one that added that tag. It looks like it was added ~8 years ago by andrewpmk. 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4663240/history

You may well be right; while not a decent place to ride a bike, you could presumably enter/exit at Transit Road before it becomes an expressway.
DaveTO (2023-04-28 01:34:15+00:00): Oh, thank you, Nate! /user/andrewpmk is an even busier guy than you -- I feel bad bothering him.

But since you are here and you also have a ton of experience in OSM. How do you suggest we should proceed? My newbie instinct is that the current bicycle=no tag between Sheppard and Transit Rd. is likely stale and should be removed to reflect the current status.
Nate Wessel (2023-04-28 02:45:01+00:00): I say go for it! Especially if you have some actual familiarity with the street / area. 

Most parts of Toronto could really use a lot more local attention. I know a ton of data was brought in by andrewpmk and others ages ago and much of it hasn't received too much tending since then. Lots of stuff is outdated or was imported and never fully verified against local knowledge.
DaveTO (2023-04-29 02:06:29+00:00): Thank you, Nate. I made these and other small changes to Allen Rd based on what we know from official documentation and street-level photos.
TrekClimbing (2023-02-22 22:18:18+00:00): The other changesets: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132901646
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132901628
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132901582
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132901534
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:10:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:10:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:11:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:10:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
Romwriter (2023-02-23 17:07:03+00:00): Hallo kukuk, diese Änderung kann ich nicht nachvollziehen. Kannst Du Quelle und Absicht erläutern?
Calmato1625 (2023-02-22 23:00:01+00:00): Ich glaube der erste Satz sollte besser so lauten: Gebäude entfernt, da dieses vor einigen Jahren abgebrannt IST und anschließend abgerissen wurde.
Herwescheluc (2023-12-21 15:49:10+00:00): Hallo Daneel76,
FYI: Habe die (Mittel-)Leitplanken bearbeitet, ergänzt und berichtigt (Außenseiten, siehe: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145376035), denke Du kannst damit leben, oder?
Frohe Feiertage!
Andreas
muchichka_s (2023-02-23 09:03:32+00:00): Привіт. Якщо магазин займає частину будівлі, то не треба її розрізати, краще залишити окрему точку. Інакше створюється додаткова проблема - дублювання адрес, що не рекомендовано
Fizzie-DWG (2023-02-26 03:43:24+00:00): Reverted by DWG for vandalism: changeset/133028369
Orblivion (2023-07-29 01:44:53+00:00): FYI adding Zen Stoneworks nuked Liar's Bench. I'll actually be there tomorrow though so I'll see about splitting it up.
AntiCompositeNumber (2023-07-29 02:07:41+00:00): I moved the Liar's Bench POI to a node. Based on https://zenstoneworks.com/ (and the "We are moving February 2023" sign in the window that I missed the first time around https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=122405840764197 ), it looks like Zenstoneworks moved to North Hampton so I just removed that POI entirely.
Orblivion (2023-07-29 02:44:33+00:00): Makes sense, should have been a node to begin with. Thanks.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-02-26 03:43:16+00:00): Reverted by DWG for vandalism: changeset/133028369
darkonus (2023-03-04 11:49:24+00:00): Масові зміни треба спочатку обговорювати зі спільнотою і документувати. У цьому наборі змін ви наробили багато помилок. Одна з багатьох — збільшення першої літери в тих назвах де цього робити не треба. Будь ласка, не робіть таких масових змін без обговорення зі спільнотою https://t.me/osmUA
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132902943
avinet_ua (2023-03-04 16:17:00+00:00): передбачалося, що всі тексти в тегу "name" вже були українською мовою і тому просто заповнювалися у відповідне поле "name:uk". Звичайно, траплялися помилки, і незначні виправлення потрібно робити вручну. вибачте якщо це щось трохи поламало. буде корисно, якщо ви зможете допомогти виправити помилки, якщо бачите вирішення

деякі написання як от бульвар я виправлю.
darkonus (2023-03-04 18:03:05+00:00): Дякую за конструктивну відповідь! На цій вікі сторінці зібрані вимоги до такого бота що є у вас. Перед тим як робити такі дуже великі зміни, будь ласка, виконайте перелік вимог: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct

Такі правила існують бо з масовими редагуваннями є ризик дуже серйозно пошкодити дані.
avinet_ua (2023-03-04 18:05:36+00:00): бульвар (бул., бульв.), бухта, б/о, б/в та ін. вже виправлені
Glassman (2023-02-23 18:21:34+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132902990
Glassman (2023-02-23 18:22:14+00:00): #TIP: square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132903088
1998alexkane (2023-04-29 18:26:55+00:00): Hi, I don't believe that this section of Oakton avenue / capitol drive is actual part of WI 190
AntMadeira (2023-02-23 03:33:56+00:00): Ora viva. ;)
Três considerações acerca deste teu conjunto de alterações:
1) alteraste duas eiras (man_made=threshing_floor) para landuse=farmyard.
Aconselho-te a ver as diferenças entre as duas etiquetas. [1] e [2]

2) Criaste uma área enorme com landuse=farmland. É algo a evitar, principalmente quando abrange casario. A área agrícola não inclui as casas, portanto, esta área nunca deveria ter o tamanho que tem.

3) Penso que te esqueceste de adicionar a etiqueta de ponte a esta linha:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1148684112

Qualquer dúvida, já sabes.

Cumprimentos,
António.

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Tag:man_made%3Dthreshing_floor
[2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Tag:landuse%3Dfarmyard
topolusitania (2023-02-23 10:55:47+00:00): Olá
Uma outra nota: As estradas dividem as areas de cultivo, floresta ou afins. A area de cultivo deverá ser dividida em duas.
Boas mapeações
TL
meioserrano (2023-02-23 16:52:55+00:00): Boas,
Obrigado pela ajuda, das eiras já percebi e ando a fazer mal, vou ter que corrigir várias e não só essas

Sobre os terrenos de cultivo é o custo de oportunidade.. se faço muito detalhe nao saio do mesmo sitio, e queria numa primeira fase avançar com toponimias, e principais usos.. senão não dá

Mas por exemplo florestas, bosques podem ter grandes áreas e passar estradas, certo?
Esta zona está praticamente a zeros, e não consigo avançar com muito detalhe, isso seria numa passagem seguinte
AntMadeira (2023-02-23 18:21:20+00:00): Isso é um mal que assola muito boa gente. ;)
Tens de definir prioridades e/ou áreas.
Todos nós gostaríamos de mapear tudo e mais alguma coisa, mas como tal não é possível, temos de dar primazia a umas coisas em detrimento de outras. 
Mas tu é que decides. Será que vale a pena mapear uma coisa "errada" na esperança de mais tarde vir a corrigi-la? Enquanto isso, o mapa é atualizado com esses problemas...
Não é que alguém se vá queixar, mas é uma questão que deverás ponderar.

Só para te dar um exemplo. Neste momento ando a mapear na zona das Caldas da Rainha, uma região onde os terrenos estão todos ligados numa área gigantesca, com estradas, casas e terrenos tudo unido numa única mancha sem espaços em "branco". Quem fez isso, fê-lo há anos e já não está no ativo, mas quem vem depois, (neste caso sou eu, mas há outros) tem o trabalho multiplicado por 10, porque tem de andar a separar e dividir tudo.

Cumprimentos,
António.
meioserrano (2023-02-25 18:06:41+00:00): Só para dar a nota que já vi a área, e de facto é muito maior do que devia (e sim, o pormenor das estradas é relevante para os agricolas)
Glassman (2023-02-23 18:23:34+00:00): Check out https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours on how to tag a business hours of operation
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132903159
stringcheezze (2023-02-25 19:50:39+00:00): Thank you!
Glassman (2023-02-23 18:24:17+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132903252
Glassman (2023-02-23 18:24:32+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132903414