piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Penegal (2025-07-06 17:14:33+00:00): Bonjour.

J’ai remarqué que vous aviez ajouté pas mal de mairies avec, en nom, « Mairie de X ». Attention, ceci est incorrect car redondant : le fait que ce soit une mairie est donné par amenity=townhall, et la commune où se situe la mairie indique de quelle commune relève cette mairie ; si on veut indiquer qu’il s’agit d’une mairie, d’un hôtel de ville… townhall:type=* est indiqué (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:amenity%3Dtownhall#Name). Sinon, c’est basiquement taguer pour le rendu.

Bonne journée à vous !
Penegal (2025-07-06 18:21:32+00:00): Oups ! Désolé, c’est pas à vous que je devais dire ça…
nlehuby (2025-07-07 07:01:54+00:00): Bonjour,

attention tout de même, le fait de mettre un nom ou pas sur les mairies ne fait pas l'objet d'un consensus dans la communauté (voir par exemple ce fil sur le forum https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/utilite-des-noms-descriptifs/16715/76), et la reconstruction d'un nom complet de mairie à partir de la commune où elle se situe n'est pas une opération si triviale que ça en a l'air.

Bonne cartographie.
jptolosa (2025-05-28 07:08:07+00:00): No existe vado sobre un curso seco casi permanentemente.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166838156
Gabriel Palma Ojeda (2025-05-29 13:28:21+00:00): Entendido.
jptolosa (2025-05-28 07:07:13+00:00): Hola, los discos pare no los puedes agregar en la esquina misma, deben estar puestos en el lugar preciso para dar a conocer a qué calle aplica.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166838300
Gabriel Palma Ojeda (2025-05-29 13:25:50+00:00): Entendido
SafwatHalaby (2025-05-28 09:08:36+00:00): שלום שאולי. תודה על התרומות! אתה לעיתים מוסיף עגלות קפה כ-"אטרקציה תיורתית" זה אינו התיוג הנכון. צריך להוסיף אותם כ-cafe. זה לא נתמך ממפת הטיולים הפתוחה למיטב ידיעתי, אבל ניתן לעשות זאת מ-https://www.openstreetmap.org/

כמו כן, נא להקפיד לשים את השעות באופן מתיוג ולא בתיאור מילולי
shauli (2025-05-28 09:16:39+00:00): סליחה, אבל אני מעלה את הנקודות האלו לפי האפשריות הניתנות באתר. אין אפשרות להוסיף אותם כ - caffe ולכן אני משתמש באטרקציה התיירותית
לדעתי זה גם לא כל כך קריטי
תודה
SafwatHalaby (2025-05-28 11:03:06+00:00): זה כן חשוב. 

א. מפת הטיולים הפתוחה היא רק ממשק אחד ל-OSM, ול-OSM יש נהלים, ואם לא הולכים לפיהם המידע לאט לאט הופך להיות ליותר ויותר ירוד. 

ב. יש אלפי שימושים ל-OSM מעבר להיותו מאגר המידע של מפת הטיולים הפתוחה. אם אני מחפש "בתי קפה" באיזשהי אפליקציה אחרת כמו organic maps אני לא אמצא את עגלות הקפה שהוספת כאטרקציה תיורתית. אם אני מחפש איזשהו בילוי אני עלול למצוא עגלת קפה.


ג. עגלות קפה הן לא אטרקציה תירותית. הן צריכות להיראות עם האייקון של בית קפה במפת הטיולים הפתוחה.
SafwatHalaby (2025-05-28 11:16:28+00:00): אני בינתיים אשנה את העגלות שהוספת לבתי קפה, ואנסה להבין מול החב'רה של מפת הטיולים מה עושים הלאה

אל תפסיק להוסיף מידע. התרומות מבורכות ומקסימום אני אמשיך לתקן אותן כפתרון זמני.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-06-07 07:39:17+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18324
MassCartog (2025-05-28 01:52:55+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OSM. In this changeset you removed a trail that seems to have a good amount of heatmap activity data, its visible in Lidar data, and some parts are visible with aerial imagery not covered by tree canopy. By all accounts it seems to exist on the ground regardless of being illegal. 

Looks like you have a new account, so I'll give you some info on the OSM project. If a trail actually exists on the ground should not be removed from OSM, regardless if it's private or public, designated or informal/illegal. Please don't remove valid data from OpenStreetMap.

The correct way to handle this is to use the tagging system. access=no seems to apply here. Once this is done, services that do use OSM data will reflect that and specify their access. 

Please read this for more info:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F

The trail should be restored and tagged correctly, making it access=no. Only once the trails is completely gone and overgrown, then it's okay to remove it.
US Forest Service (2025-05-28 10:15:18+00:00): This trail was decommissioned years ago and not pat for US Forest Service national trails. We can't close it or have other people use the reroute, if this old trail still exist. when can I edit the tags then if I can't remove the trail.
MikeN (2025-05-28 11:17:33+00:00): It is still listed in https://foothillstrail.org/portfolio/round-mountain-gap/ 

The trail has been restored in changeset #166870794
MassCartog (2025-05-28 13:07:45+00:00): User MikeN restored the trails. Now you are able to go update the access tags for the trails. To do this click on the effected trails, find the "allowed access" section, and put "no" under "all". Alternatively you can go to the "Tag" section and add a new tag with "access" = "no".

Make sure to provide a source for this information, such as a link to official trail documents to show this trail is now closed and an unofficial/restricted area.

For more information about tagging trails please read about the "United States/Trails Stewardship Initiative" here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States/Trails_Stewardship_Initiative
eggie (2025-05-27 19:20:11+00:00): Dag donux  Een fietspad zie ik ook niet. Wel is in de BGT transparant een pad ingetekend. 
Mocht er nog een informele oversteek zijn dan highway=path 
informal=yes surface=grass
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-05-27 19:23:25+00:00): In  de heg daar zit een gat en in de middenberm zie ik ook een spoor.
De oversteek wordt kennelijk nog gebruikt. Je zou het als bovenstaand kunnnen aanpassen naar war wij noemen een olifantenpaadje.
eggie (2025-05-27 19:42:43+00:00): Met Slagboom&Peeters zie ik een spoor .. ook door de middenberm.  Een fietspad is het zeker niet. Up to you.
eggie (2025-05-27 19:00:02+00:00): Welkom bij OSM,
Bedankt voor uw bijdrage,
MVG
eggie
woodpeck (2025-05-27 18:56:11+00:00): You have deleted more than 50 buildings in this edit. You have not explained why you are deleting them, other than giving us the word salad "#hotosm-project-18648 #APHub #myOSM #help-mm-earthquake" which does not tell us anything. If these buildings have been destroyed by an earthquake, please write a human-readable explaination - "deleting buildings that have been destroyed" would be good.
eggie (2025-05-27 19:04:05+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback.. Ik denk niet dat het klopt. De PDOK uit 2024 is wat we noemen 'outdated'. Op recentere beelden is die landtong er wel. 
https://viewer.satellietdataportaal.nl/@52.51834,6.415967,19/?datastrip=20250411_PNEO-04
Ik zal je wijziging terugdraaien.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-05-27 19:06:58+00:00): reverted by changeset #166840433

Mocht je nog vragen hebben stel ze gerust.
Beter niet blindvaren op luchtfoto's. 
De laatste foto is van een paar weken geleden. 
MVG
eggie
Pink Duck (2025-05-28 14:15:59+00:00): Typo ALNR?
Pink Duck (2025-05-28 14:16:33+00:00): Also sure this reads number plates and isn’t just a basic traffic counter?
Binky Bunny (2025-05-28 16:06:18+00:00): There is no typo. In the UK they are commonly refered to as "Number Plates" hence Automatic Number Plate Recognition camera. ALPR tends to be common in North America where thery're referred to as "Licence Plates" which is probably why it's the default nomenclature on this site.

For traffic counters they tend to use inductive pickup loops embedded in the road surface for permanent installations and pneumatic ones consisting of a pair of rubber tubes stretched across the road and connected to a box chained to a nearby lamp post for temporary setups. If they're going to the effort of installing a camera and all the power and data lines as well as image recognition system it might as well be reading number plates as thats just a slight software tweak and effectively makes it a much more powerful tool than just a basic traffic counter.  Also ANPR cameras tend to be placed on main roads at the fringes of larger towns like Norwich to keep a log of all traffic entering and leaving the town as this data can be valuable to law enforcement as demonstrated in the recent "Sycamore Gap" case.

I've mapped hundreds all across the UK because the government refuse to publish their locations and you start to see the patterns in their placement. Some areas have more than others. Other cameras tend to have signs with the details of the operator and data controller but ANPR cameras don't because they're not supposed to be known about.
Pink Duck (2025-05-28 18:36:48+00:00): Oh, seems it is another of those Americanisms that have made it into OSM tagging convention. However, can see why I queried since only one letter transition away from what they are commonly referred to here. Thanks for the background info.
silly_goose (2025-05-27 19:37:17+00:00): hotel closed down, please check and adjust my "disused:" tags.
feedback for the future is appreciated, thank you!
citrula (2025-05-27 21:27:53+00:00): Welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contribution. In general we try to "keep the history" by modifying existing objects instead of deleting and recreating new ones, even if the old one is substantially incorrect. I brought back the old node and combined it with the new information you added on yours. Please take a moment to make sure it's all correct :)
eggie (2025-05-28 07:29:17+00:00): Dag Eclopspsis,

Je vraagt feedback. Lijkt me oke. Ik heb alleen de mp relatie eraf gehaald. Die lijkt me niet nodig. .. 
gr eggie
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-07-23 04:06:59+00:00): This changeset connected bridges to the roads they cross
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166841758
kasa kai (2025-07-23 13:27:37+00:00): That was deliberate because the speed cameras that point at the roads are installed to the base of the bridge. Should I change that?
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-07-23 23:43:43+00:00): Connecting bridges to the roads they cross messes up navigation. It makes navigation maps think they can turn there. 
Please don't do this
rene78 (2025-06-02 22:08:42+00:00): I think they only accept Lightning - at least according to this video: https://youtube.com/shorts/5Xhqkfrf_s8?si=0ljcOdGM6NQmB5eC
jptolosa (2025-05-28 07:39:26+00:00): Hola, es preferible utilizar las fotos de Esri en lugar de Bing, ya que suelen estar más actualizadas.
AndreaDp271 (2025-05-27 21:04:43+00:00): Ciao, perché hai rimosso tutte le direzioni dei segnali?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166842106
OSMCowboy (2025-05-29 00:10:10+00:00): Correction: Source used was Maxar satellite imagery via MGP Pro 2025-02-17.
MassCartog (2025-05-28 01:26:33+00:00): Hello, Welcome to OSM. Looks like you have a new account and new to OSM. OSM is about truth and mapping what exists on the ground, not about curating reality.  If a trail exists on the ground should not be removed from OSM, regardless if it's private or public, designated or informal. Please stop removing this data from OpenStreetMap!

A trail being "unofficial" is not a valid reason to remove data from OSM.

The correct way to handle this is to use the tagging system. access=no seems to apply here. Once this is done, services that do use OSM data will reflect that and specify their access. 

Please read this page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F

It's clear these trails are valid and exist, that can be seen from the activity heatmap data from the area. Better signage and barricades on the ground will help lost visitors better than removing OSM data.

Going forward, you should know, purposeful removal of features known to exist on the ground is Vandalism. Only once the trails are completely gone and overgrown, then it's okay to remove it. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Vandalism
rempshaener (2025-05-29 08:24:38+00:00): Hallo,

du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Das sieht gut aus, ich habe keine Anmerkungen.

Viele Grüße
SafwatHalaby (2025-05-28 08:50:28+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM, thank you for your contribution!

You might want to slightly move Work Place, as right now it's in the middle of the road it's not clear on which side of the road it is.

It's also recommended to check out the Israel Guidelines here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Israel#The_basics

ברוכים הבאים ותודה על התרומה! כדאי להזיז את workplace מערבה\מזרחה כי כרגע זה בדיוק באמצע הרחוב ולא ברור מאיזה צד זה.

מומלץ גם לקרוא את ההנחיות לישראל כאן: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/HE:Israel
MassCartog (2025-05-28 01:26:37+00:00): Hello, Welcome to OSM. Looks like you have a new account and new to OSM. OSM is about truth and mapping what exists on the ground, not about curating reality.  If a trail exists on the ground should not be removed from OSM, regardless if it's private or public, designated or informal. Please stop removing this data from OpenStreetMap!

A trail being "unofficial" is not a valid reason to remove data from OSM.

The correct way to handle this is to use the tagging system. access=no seems to apply here. Once this is done, services that do use OSM data will reflect that and specify their access. 

Please read this page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F

It's clear these trails are valid and exist, that can be seen from the activity heatmap data from the area. Better signage and barricades on the ground will help lost visitors better than removing OSM data.

Going forward, you should know, purposeful removal of features known to exist on the ground is Vandalism. Only once the trails are completely gone and overgrown, then it's okay to remove it. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Vandalism
silversurfer83 (2025-05-27 20:43:59+00:00): Hi :)

zwischen den Ortschaften wäre hier "highway=unclassified" angebrachter. Da wir aber nach Verkehrsbedeutung erfassen, kann es durchaus sein, dass "hw=tertiary" weiter korrekt ist.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:highway

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166842846
hmichel777 (2025-05-28 05:06:53+00:00): Ja, da war ich mir unsicher - ich werde das ändern. Tertiary hielte ich für falsch, weil sich mit der Abstufung die Verkehrsbedeutung ändert. Auch faktisch ist mit der Verkehrsfreigabe der A49 dort kaum noch überörtlicher Verkehr festzustellen.
silversurfer83 (2025-05-28 05:10:09+00:00): Alles klar. Ist auch nicht immer ganz einfach hier :)
eggie (2025-05-28 07:19:06+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
NeisBot (2025-05-27 20:37:19+00:00): Hi kitharoidos, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Modified node geometry."

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment #AIgenerated #NoComment
Glassman (2025-05-28 18:46:39+00:00): #TIP: street names are spelled out in OSM. The reason is software has a hard with abbreviated words
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166843140
hNdrX_ (2025-05-30 19:41:41+00:00): sieht gut aus!
Glassman (2025-05-28 18:49:24+00:00): Residential roads in rural areas are typically tagged as highway=unclassified. OSM use the British road classification system since OSM was started in England. So basically, rural residential roads are classified as unclassified. You will see many wrongly classified rural roads because when the data was imported, before my time, they called them residential.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166843310
jptolosa (2025-05-28 06:37:47+00:00): Hola, la línea férrea está en desuso, por ende no se agrega un cruce de nivel acá.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166843359
Gabriel Palma Ojeda (2025-05-29 13:25:44+00:00): Entendido, y es que OSM me lo sugirió pero entendí
VLD549 (2025-06-07 15:38:27+00:00): Hi, I was asked to verify name changes. It seems to me that the indicated curve between the Schietbaanstraat coming from the north west, goes until past the VZW inside-outside. It is the building right below the indicated name change. The website of that business says their address is Schietbaanstraat 100.
https://www.inout-oostende.be/contact/

Could you elaborate?

Thank you very much!
NeisBot (2025-05-27 20:50:35+00:00): Hi VLD298, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 48 building(s)
- 2 landuse(')

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=166843634
VLD298 (2025-05-28 13:08:26+00:00): Hello NeisBot, 

Yes, the deletions here were intentional. The building polygons were removed because they were not accurately representing the true status of the area. 

Thanks! -VLD298
NeisReview (2025-05-28 13:11:25+00:00): 👍 Thank you for your map updates.

#HappyMapping
Glassman (2025-05-28 18:54:56+00:00): #TIP: it is good to also add a tag describing the type of business. My guess would be industrial=seafood_processing
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166843689
b-jazz (2025-05-28 14:49:24+00:00): RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1390227378

As has been pointed out several times before: fairways and greens (and many other combinations of golf course elements) should *not* intersect each other. Please see previous changeset comments for instructions on how to properly map golf courses. https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=20807485
crodthauser (2025-05-27 21:21:38+00:00): Korrektur des CS-Kommentars oben: Nicht "Anlieger frei", sondern "Kfz" frei; siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166844541.
Glassman (2025-05-28 18:59:23+00:00): Is this a parking lot, if so it probably should be tagged like the parking lots here -> https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166844293#map=19/45.909898/-122.747472. The reason for adding the service road is to allow the routers to direct the user right to the building.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166844293
AndyB_66 (2025-05-28 12:07:21+00:00): Po raz kolejny proszę - używaj sensownych komentarzy do zestawu zmian - ponieważ „poprawki” nie pomaga innym mapperom zrozumieć, co robisz. Stosuj się do zasad, obowiązujących w społeczności OSM: osm.wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
Dziękuję!
Marc_ch (2025-05-28 07:24:21+00:00): Bonjour,
merci pour votre contribution qui améliorer les donjonnées.
cependant, vous avez transformé un battement en magasin, bâtiment qui pourtant semble contenir plusieurs occupants.
la solution est de faire un objet par occupant https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12870054896
Je vous laisse le positionner à sa position précise.
Par ailleurs qu'est devenu l’hôtel à la même adresse ?
Salutations,
Marc
Wandel-Appeltje (2025-05-27 21:43:22+00:00): enige dat ik nog niet kon vinden (later aanpassen) is de 3-lettercode voor Vattenfall,  heb gebruikt:  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ref:EU:EVSE
Wandel-Appeltje (2025-05-27 21:44:50+00:00): CPO or Location Owner ID zeg maar... de code voor Vattenfall
eggie (2025-05-28 07:25:16+00:00): Even geen idee.. Hier wel wat leesvoer
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station

Er is in het forum een rubriek korte vragen.. 

 https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/korte-vragen-met-hopelijk-een-kort-antwoord/127479/34
Ik heb wel de parkeerstroken ingetekend. 
MVG
eggie
dadavid (2025-06-11 11:48:37+00:00): ist der Weg denn physisch erreichbar? Also kann er von Feuerwehr, Rettungsdienst und Polizei verwendet werden?

Viele Grüße
NeisBot (2025-05-27 22:37:46+00:00): Hi Kolfe, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Added and adjusted nodes, modified a way, and removed a created_by tag."

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment #AIgenerated #Gibberish
IIVQ (2025-06-01 11:20:38+00:00): Hoi, ik zie dat jij het toekomstige sporenplan van Groningen in OSM hebt gezet, maar het loopt op dit moment dwars door alle perrons heen. Heb jij een tekening waar die ook op staan, en de nieuwe bustunnel?
Josbert Lonnee (2025-06-02 10:50:54+00:00): De sporen zijn in aanbouw ingetekend, want ze liggen er nog niet, maar er wordt wel aan gewerkt, vandaar. Worden de oude perrons al (deels) verwijderd? Een tekening met de nieuwe ligging / vormen van de perrons heb ik helaas niet, maar kijk ik wel naar uit.
IIVQ (2025-06-21 13:08:45+00:00): Dank je voor je reactie. Ik ben benieuwd naar hoe het wordt!
wildmaps (2025-05-27 22:53:01+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166846571
A67-A67 (2025-05-29 21:57:27+00:00): Hi, 
Are you sure the paths you marked as cycleway are cycleways instead of footways with bicycles allowed?

Many paths were tagged as footway with bicycles allowed (highway=footway, bicycle=yes/permissive). At least around the schools this tagging used to be correct.
A67-A67 (2025-05-29 22:02:09+00:00): Note that bicycle=designated is implied by highway=cycleway and shouldn't be added.
bob3bob3 (2025-05-27 23:24:30+00:00): Woops. this changeset not from live Mapillary data. Shoud be titled "(Mostly) Data from discarded Mapillary private imagery, mostly street addresses."
Fizzie-DWG (2025-06-14 04:38:23+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167598636
Aleksandar Matejevic (2025-05-28 07:11:11+00:00): Hi Violaine_Do,

I have seen on couple of your changesets that you are changing boundary=land_area to boundary=administrative. 

The problem that is happening is that now we have 2 relations for the same administrative unit, one with just land area and another one including water area. 

Is there any consensus withing community about how admin_level=6 boundaries should be represented on OSM?

If there is one, can you, please, remove duplicate boundaries?

One of the examples of duplicate boundaries:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16120494

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1363094