piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Tomas Straupis (2026-02-13 19:22:12+00:00): :-) ok
Alexb60 (2026-02-13 16:27:22+00:00): Bonjour,

Petit problème avec le SIRET de ce noeud : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/116272990
Sébastien Pi (2026-02-13 16:29:51+00:00): En effet^^ je corrige. Merci pour le signalement
Richard (2026-05-01 13:55:43+00:00): I might be missing something, but the dual carriageway from Stanion to Kettering is the A43, not the A6003, isn't it? Why have you changed it to the A6003?
0235 (2026-05-01 15:24:00+00:00): You are right, I have no idea how i have ended up changing every section of this road to A6003?

It should be A43, but my original download of Corby still lists it as this, and my subsequent JOSM files i have kept of edits has this changed to the incorrect A6003.

I will change this back
aTarom (2026-02-13 17:21:00+00:00): Hola, se han añadido varios tags de importación tipo:
> CODI_AUTEN
> CODI_PRODUCTE
> CODI_VARIETAT
> COEF_PASTURA
... varios más
puedes revisarlos?
Saludos
aTarom (2026-02-13 19:40:40+00:00): Ara he tingut una estona, retirades:
> CANVI_US
> CODI_AUTEN
> CODI_PRODUCTE
> CODI_VARIETAT
> COEF_PASTURA
> CROQUIS
> DATAMODIFICACIO
> ENTITAT
> ID_REC
> IND_ERROR_CROQUIS_DECLA
> NIF_XIFRAT
> NUM_PAR
> OBJECTID
> PRODU_CROQUIS
> PRODUCTE
> SUPER_CROQUIS
> SUPER_DECLA
> SUPER_DECLA_M2
> SUPER_SIGPAC
> TIPUS_DECLRC
> US_DECLA
> US_SIGPAC
> VEDEC_ID
Salutacions
Uanraf (2026-02-14 21:38:50+00:00): Perdona, he estat fent proves i l’he cagat… Vaig tirar com a base de la DUN 2025 i després vaig arreglar tots els camps amb formes rares, solapes, etc, però vaig deixar-me el més important…. Avui no tinc accés a l’ordinador però dimarts ho arreglo.
Uanraf (2026-02-14 21:40:00+00:00): Vale, ho has tret tu… Merci!
NeisBot (2026-02-13 16:27:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13271248695 v4

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Law office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-22 05:33:44+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178885364
(No visible changes after review)
Endres Pelka (2026-02-14 13:47:28+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours
ScrawnyMeowth1 (2026-02-13 20:01:01+00:00): Hello Devin,

I appreciate your hard work adding landuse. However, please do not combine disconnected landuse areas into a single multipolygon. This makes it a big pain to edit later on down the road. I also do not recommend creating multipolygons with shared lines at the edge; creating single ways for each landuse area works just fine and is less of a hassle to maintain.
deven_smith_ (2026-02-14 01:24:47+00:00): See in essence I understand where you're coming from but I have found it harder for me to edit areas that are just single areas connected to each other. I am running into this in fixing land use mapping up around Colville I did when I started mapping years ago as it is harder to add a pond later on or a meadow or anything else if everything are areas. Having one area per "area" for me is easier because I can just add a line where needed that divide the uses connected or if I need to add something within an area later I can just add it to the multipolygon as a inner portion.

I'm sure there is a middle ground but for me, this has been a lot easier for maintaining later and adding to it.
watmildon (2026-02-19 03:18:45+00:00): deven, several mappers have all reached out to you with the same message. I think it's quite bad form to be un-yielding in this way. The data in the map lived much much longer than the minutes it takes you to enter it. Beyond that you're in danger of all of you work needing to be ripped out, making it totally meaningless.

The map isn't just "the data that is fastest to get in". It's "what can we maintain and share with one another into the future." There's no rush. No urgency that requires us to do things in a way that causes pain for other users.

I am again suggesting you take some good advice when it's presented instead of being stubborn about it.
deven_smith_ (2026-02-19 05:04:53+00:00): See changeset #178752934, I think this should work better for everyone involved and easier for later maintenance. Please let me know what you think
FroschForscher (2026-02-18 20:42:58+00:00): Hallo Marc1152,
was genau wurde hier korrigiert bzw. was war vorher falsch?
Ich sehe nur das eine Bank (Linie) gelöscht wurde und durch einen Bank (Knoten) an gleicher stelle mit dem Zusatz armrest=no ersetzt wurde.

FroschForscher
Marc1152 (2026-02-19 18:27:20+00:00): Hallo FroschForscher
mir ist vor Ort zufällig aufgefallen, dass diese Sitzbank im Gegensatz zu den umliegenden bei CoMaps nicht angezeigt wird. Ich war mir sicher, dass es an der Linie liegt und habe sie daher analog zu den umliegenden Bänken als Knoten eingetragen. 
Außerdem hielt ich es wegen der Geringfügigkeit der Änderung für mich als Neuling für ein geeignetes Übungsobjekt, um etwas Erfahrung mit dem iD Editor zu sammeln.
Hoffe, das passt so.
FroschForscher (2026-02-22 20:38:57+00:00): Danke für die Antwort

> Außerdem hielt ich es wegen der Geringfügigkeit der Änderung für mich als Neuling für ein geeignetes Übungsobjekt, um etwas Erfahrung mit dem iD Editor zu sammeln. 

Mit kleinen unkritischen Sachen zu beginnen ist die richtige Einstellung.

> dass diese Sitzbank im Gegensatz zu den umliegenden bei CoMaps nicht angezeigt wird. Ich war mir sicher, dass es an der Linie liegt und habe sie daher analog zu den umliegenden Bänken als Knoten eingetragen. 
…
Hoffe, das passt so. 

Ganz grundsätzlich ist das ein Problem von CoMaps¹ und nicht von den Daten (Linien sind für Sitzbänke erlaubt). Und sollte als Bug/Feature bei CoMaps gemeldet werden.
Für eine kleine Bank muss aber auch kein Topf aufgemacht werden.

¹ Wenn man an die stelle Tipp wird auch "Sitzbank" angezeigt, es wird also erkannt aber mangel Icon/etc. nicht angezeigt.
Marc1152 (2026-02-23 19:10:49+00:00): Verstehe. 
Ja, das komische Verhalten von CoMaps an der Stelle ist mir auch aufgefallen.
Mit ging es lediglich um die willkommene Gelegenheit, ein Kleinwenig zu üben und die Auswirkungen auf CoMaps etwas kennenzulernen.
pitscheplatsch (2026-02-13 17:17:57+00:00): Hi,

may we know the reason behind deleting many name:* here?

Best regards,
Pascal
pitscheplatsch (2026-02-13 17:18:53+00:00): In particular here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/106806430/history/67
JonnyW03 (2026-04-15 15:09:36+00:00): Hi,
The airfield had been mislabelled as a civilian airfield; it is actually Royal Air Force Gibraltar, a military airfield. The civilian terminal is to the north, and does not cover the runway and airfield. 

Best regards, 
Jonny
rskedgell (2026-02-13 18:56:36+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thank you for updating these and other shops. It's nice to see a BID getting involved.

Could I make one suggestion when a shop, restaurant, etc. has closed and the premises are vacant? Rather than simply deleting the tag which tells data consumers what sort of feature this is (in this case, shop=bathroom ), but instead add the disused: lifecycle prefix so that it would become disused:shop=bathroom . You could also optionally add a check_date=* tag 

I should stress that your edit is not incorrect, but using lifecycle prefixes helps people using surveying apps like StreetComplete to check periodically whether a vacant shop has a new occupier.
Rainero (2026-03-15 18:55:39+00:00): Revert mit changeset/179912888
(unzulässige Quelle)
jhuang97 (2026-03-16 06:29:03+00:00): Hello Tre, in this changeset you deleted many separately mapped sidewalks and applied the sidewalk=both tag to replace those sidewalks.  Actually, you could have applied some variation of the sidewalk=separate tag to the roads and kept the separately mapped sidewalks - see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sidewalk#Separately_mapped_sidewalks .  I would prefer if we could keep the separately mapped sidewalks since that is keeping more information in OpenStreetMap that could be useful to people.  Many other areas of the US do have separately mapped sidewalks.
jhuang97 (2026-03-16 06:35:18+00:00): Was there any particular reason that you wanted to delete separately mapped sidewalks?
Busaiolis (2026-02-13 18:53:35+00:00): Spero che non ti dispiaccia se ti scrivo ancora, volevo solo farti notare che landuse=commercial può trarre in inganno perché si riferisce ad aree adibite a servizi/uffici. Invece, per le aree prettamente commerciali come le intendiamo in italiano (cioè di vendita di beni), si usa landuse=retail.
Lorenzo Vescovini (2026-02-13 21:31:22+00:00): Va bene, ho modificato le zone interessate
qstep (2026-02-13 18:16:26+00:00): A két nagy tó össze volt kötve 48.043479, 21.908592 koordinátáknál és a vízen ment az út. Műholdkép alapján kettévágtam és egy multipolygonba raktam a két tavat, amelyek horgásztavak (és még lehet hogy a lentebb lévő kicsik is).

A tavak alatt van egy nagyobb wetland=marsh is, azt valószínűleg ki kell igazítani mert műholdkép alapján nem ekkora kiterjedésű.

Továbbá a tavak széleit még igazítani kell és a benne lévő nádasokat hozzáadni.
qstep (2026-02-13 18:21:55+00:00): Ezen a drónfelvételen látszik hogy már 2020-ban sem volt összekötve: https://youtu.be/wDj4T-StB_M?t=63
qstep (2026-02-13 18:37:19+00:00): Nagy tavak széleinek igazítása, szigetek berajzolása kész FÖMI és ESRI alapján: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178517341
literan (2026-02-14 09:25:59+00:00): не надо присваивать безымянным проездам выдуманные названия только из-за того, что дом рядом с ним адресован по какой-то удаленной улице/переулку. В Москве часто улица, по которой адресуются дома, отстоит от них весьма далеко, например https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/249104978

это не означает, что на прилегающий к зданию проезд надо ставить название той улицы.
NeisBot (2026-02-13 18:21:39+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 11 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1477765019 v2 | 4 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/9068778169 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178516804
NeisReview (2026-02-22 05:33:48+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/178852507
dknelson9876 (2026-02-17 04:37:35+00:00): Hi OpenMeatMap,

You've made multiple mistakes with the address on this office, namely placing the unit number in addr:housenumber=* and including the house number in addr:street=*. I've corrected the address on this node for you. Please pay closer attention to where the different parts of an address go in your future mapping. Feel free to ask any questions you have.
OpenMeatMap (2026-02-17 17:33:37+00:00): Hey dknelson9876,

Thank you for the corrections! I appreciate the feedback a ton. I do have a question for you, if you don't mind: 

I'm using the CoMaps app to enter nodes, and it only supplies the fields [Street, Building number, Postal Code] when I enter a building's address. Does that mean it is impossible to properly add a building via this app? Or is there a different convention which only uses these three fields? 

Thanks again for the help!
dknelson9876 (2026-02-17 17:48:31+00:00): Well, that's a bummer, I didn't realize that CoMaps doesn't expose every field for an address. I would suggest either 1) supplying the parts of the address CoMaps does allow ("2100", "West Pleasant Grove Boulevard", "84062") and adding the full address in the note field at the bottom ("[business] full address is 2100 West Pleasant Grove Boulevard, Pleasant Grove, UT, 84062") or 2) switch to another editor that does supply all necessary fields for the address, such as EveryDoor or Vespucci
OpenMeatMap (2026-02-18 15:55:17+00:00): Yes, I'm very surprised such a basic thing is missing. In that case, I will go with option 3) Switch to another editor for now, and open an issue with CoMaps to add more fields. 

Thank you for the info!
k2101 (2026-02-15 20:36:20+00:00): Cześć, 
Klub Nafta cały czas istnieje. Dlaczego go tu usunięto?
uprkos (2026-07-03 20:53:36+00:00): Sprawdziłem i przywróciłem w odpowiednim miejscu. Jakiś czas temu już, ale potwierdzam dla porządku w papierach :)
BubbaJuice (2026-03-27 01:18:53+00:00): Hello,
The building you added here does not exist. Please check the buildings you are importing carefully. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1477858554

Thank you,
BubbaJuice
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-14 01:34:13+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1477860340

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Sakari_N (2026-03-21 12:36:31+00:00): 

Moi,

Jos tiennumeroa ei ole merkitty maastoon (tai se on merkitty niin heikosti että sitä ei voi pitää navigointiin kelvollisena), kuuluisi käyttää unsigned_ref=* tagia ref=* tagin sijaan.

Keskustelua aiheesta: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/ref-tunniste-ns-paikallisteilla-automatisoidut-muokkaukset/135446/5
Sakari_N (2026-03-21 13:40:16+00:00): Poistin näistä ref=* tagit (kun kävin näitä muutenkin suomesta läpi)

Tässä on myös yhdellä tiellä lanes=1.75, josta JOSM validaattori herjasi. Kaistamäärän pitäisi olla nollaa suurempi kokonaisluku, ja jos kaistoja on vaikea määritellä niin wiki antaa esimerkkinä vaikkapa: " lane_markings=no and optionally: width=4 source:width=estimated "

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lanes?uselang=en#Examples
NeisBot (2026-02-13 18:53:22+00:00): Hi dariohgz, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 99% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 48 addr(s)
- 7 amenity(s)
- 2 barrier(s)
- 290 building(s)
- 5 highway(s)
- 1 historic(s)
- 3 leisure(s)
- 1 man_made(s)
- 11 name(s)
- 3 surface(s)
- 3 tourism(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178517740
NeisRevert (2026-02-13 19:03:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/178518043
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
pitscheplatsch (2026-02-13 19:05:36+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178518004

Looks like someone was faster than me.
NeisBot (2026-02-13 18:58:22+00:00): Hi Michael Collins, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 93% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 49 building(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178517888
woodpeck (2026-02-13 19:07:34+00:00): Michael, I can see that the buildings you have removed are not visible on Bing imagery any more so I assume the deletions are legit. However, when you come across whole clusters of buildings that you believe to be wrong, take a moment to study how they have been added to OSM - in this case, two years ago in a project identifying itself as "#hotosm-project-15495" - and maybe contact those who added the buildings. Who knows, perhaps they had better information than the current Bing imagery lets you see? 

Also, when deleting whole clusters of buildings, don't use a changeset comment that says "mapped buildings" - clearly say that you deleted lots of buildings on purpose because you could not identify them on the imagery. That helps us other mappers understand that you knew what you were doing, rather than accidentally deleting buildings!
pitscheplatsch (2026-02-13 19:08:57+00:00): Hi Michael Collins, again 🙂

Hopefully this time you did not use Google Earth or Maps, right?

Best regards,
Pascal
Michael Collins (2026-02-13 19:46:13+00:00): I deleted lots of buildings on purpose because there were no indications of roofs or shadows that would indicate buildings on the Bing imagery.
ika-chan! (2026-02-13 23:27:20+00:00): Hello, you seem to be very new here: the introduction guide is at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_contribute, and you can ask questions from your new account at https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/gr/68
Kees 59 (2026-03-02 16:28:44+00:00): Hi, there appears to be some mis-typing in the node:13556562137 (Love N Scrub).  The wetland key has an email adres as the value. Should that maybe be the email key?
dknelson9876 (2026-03-07 01:00:56+00:00): whoops, don't know how I made that mistake. Thanks for catching it.
Wereldkaart123 (2026-02-13 19:27:15+00:00): Note: this is an incomplete/unfinished house. The build seems to be 'on hold' for whatever reason
NeisBot (2026-02-13 19:20:22+00:00): Hi Michael Collins, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 89% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 61 building(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178518566
Michael Collins (2026-02-13 19:47:31+00:00): I deleted lots of buildings on purpose because there were no indications of roofs or shadows that would indicate buildings on the Bing imagery.
streckenkundler (2026-02-13 20:27:52+00:00): Bitte erst disskutieren und genehmigen: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/import-marktstammdatenregister-data-for-wind-power-plants/140622/39
streckenkundler (2026-02-13 20:27:39+00:00): Bitte erst disskutieren und genehmigen: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/import-marktstammdatenregister-data-for-wind-power-plants/140622/39
streckenkundler (2026-02-13 20:26:55+00:00): Bitte erst disskutieren und genehmigen: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/import-marktstammdatenregister-data-for-wind-power-plants/140622/39
eggie (2026-02-13 19:58:58+00:00): Hoi,

Dit zal in ieder geval beter routeren met die verbindingen.
Er wordt verschillend over gedacht. Wel of niet die langsliggende trottoirs mappen.
Mapse,
eggie
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-14 05:41:54+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13540954667

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2026-02-14 22:31:59+00:00): Why are you adjusting speed limits on random sections far apart unrelated to each other?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178519678
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2026-02-14 22:44:01+00:00): This changeset deleted a highway tag. All your changes have been reverted. Please don't go around changing random tags.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178519678
muralito (2026-03-02 19:29:26+00:00): Same problem in a new changeset from atheusachado
NeisBot (2026-02-13 19:57:39+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 10 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/583573944 v3 | 6 crossings
https://osm.org/way/583573958 v3 | 4 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/5579185035 v3

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178519709
ika-chan! (2026-02-13 20:43:41+00:00): Hello, you seem to be very new here: the introduction guide is at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_contribute, and you can ask questions from your new account at https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/gr/68
ika-chan! (2026-02-13 23:28:08+00:00): Darn it! In true clumsy ika-chan! fashion, I accidentally talked to myself.
MassCartog (2026-02-15 00:52:05+00:00): Hi, in this change set you removed a road that seems to still appear in areal imagery, could you explain why? It seems like it was labeled highway=service is that incorrect, and why remove it and not just update the feature type?
mueschel (2026-02-15 10:31:46+00:00): Hi,
what does 'AvS:id" mean? It's not common to have ":id" in tags - reference numbers are usually added with "ref:avs" or similar.
FrViPofm (2026-02-15 11:31:45+00:00): Hi, You're right !
I was working fast with a group for identifying the buildings manages by the Municipality.
I'm going to change the tag for "ref:FR:87001"
eggie (2026-02-13 22:01:06+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  Volgens je eigen note zou dit gesloten zijn?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5166403

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-02-13 22:05:51+00:00): opening_hours=Su 00:00-00:00
Zeker weten?
Stoepie (2026-02-13 22:25:33+00:00): Openingstijden zijn nvt. Permanent gesloten, dat weet ik zeker.
eggie (2026-02-13 22:31:44+00:00): Thx..
Ik haal morgen wel even de bedrijfsinfo van deze adresnode af.
Het komt wel goed.
Groet,
eggie
literan (2026-02-14 10:17:59+00:00): не надо писать в тег name капсом. Орать, в общем, незачем)
randomaper (2026-02-15 20:07:11+00:00): Это не я написал, тег сам таким же был
literan (2026-02-16 18:37:10+00:00): Ну как же не вы, когда вы)
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/38106162
randomaper (2026-02-20 18:39:32+00:00): Нет, это не я написал. Бренд появляется автоматически, когда вводишь “Metro”. Я не могу изменить официальный бренд, который предлагает OSM
literan (2026-02-21 09:40:26+00:00): не OSM предлагает, а один из редакторов базы. Ошибочно предлагает. Смысла в этой правке нет никакого, я все равно откачу.
NeisBot (2026-02-13 20:57:39+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 13 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/694016358 v4 | 13 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/11330682342 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178521525
NeisReview (2026-02-22 05:33:48+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/178756242
ScrawnyMeowth1 (2026-02-17 22:56:14+00:00): Hello haihaus,

Just a friendly reminder to check different imageries when you're adding features to the map. If you look at Esri imagery (which is more recent than Bing imagery), there are some houses that have been constructed in the southwest corner of this farmland. I have gone ahead and updated the landuse accordingly.

Thanks!