piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2026-03-26 16:42:54+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13680274449 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Orthodontic clinic"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-03 22:33:16+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180832921
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
MappingMore (2026-03-27 10:48:01+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:180495823
eggie (2026-03-27 08:21:35+00:00): Dag Albert, Lijkt me oke.
Gr eggie
bartgron (2026-03-26 21:02:15+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
bartgron (2026-03-26 21:01:30+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
eggie (2026-03-26 17:19:43+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Wildsharky (2026-04-01 14:30:33+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:180492296
iandees (2026-03-26 18:12:26+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12479045239 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180467840, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
YomanNH (2026-03-31 08:57:32+00:00): Usunąłem cały ten wandalizm.
iandees (2026-03-26 18:12:31+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1688065490 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180467846, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
MappingMore (2026-03-27 10:32:05+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180495061
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-26 18:19:41+00:00): (Partly) Revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180419770
NeisBot (2026-03-26 17:15:49+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13682383102 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Heating and Air Conditioning office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisAgent (2026-03-27 12:16:33+00:00): 🕵 The changeset tags appear to reference Google Maps or another Google mapping service as a data source.

Please note that using Google Maps, Google Street View, or similar Google services as a mapping source is not allowed in OpenStreetMap due to license restrictions.

More information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google

If the data in this changeset was derived from Google Maps or another incompatible source, the edits may need to be reverted.

If this is a misunderstanding and the data was collected from permitted sources (e.g. local survey, Bing imagery, local knowledge, etc.), please clarify in a reply.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-15 09:15:27+00:00): Reverted adding SEO POI with blatant advertising and nonsense tags, sourced from Google Map, sin changeset 184127235

https://osm.org/changeset/184127235
MappingMore (2026-03-27 07:42:48+00:00): Revert of 180381262
daganzdaanda (2026-03-28 23:05:17+00:00): Adressen revertiert mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180503047 
Siehe auch Kommentar bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180531824
daganzdaanda (2026-03-28 23:05:06+00:00): Adressen revertiert mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180503047 
Siehe auch Kommentar bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180531824
Beinardus (2026-03-26 17:55:12+00:00): Misschien even de huisnummer node terugzetten. Iemand had de POI met de huisnummer node gemerged.
Comino (2026-03-26 19:32:44+00:00): Thanks!
Done.
NeisBot (2026-03-26 17:39:42+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 11 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/87835211 v8 | 7 crossings
https://osm.org/way/87835066 v12 | 4 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/1021090224 v4

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180466106
MappingMore (2026-03-27 10:51:19+00:00): Revert of 180442188
daganzdaanda (2026-03-28 23:04:55+00:00): Adressen revertiert mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180503047 
Siehe auch Kommentar bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180531824
Wildsharky (2026-04-01 14:23:34+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:180485861
NeisBot (2026-03-26 17:51:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/1013170006 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Tour operator office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-04-03 22:33:18+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/180466879
ajmat (2026-03-27 07:59:56+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: 180488981
daganzdaanda (2026-03-28 23:04:14+00:00): Adressen revertiert mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180503047 
Siehe auch Kommentar bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180531824
MappingMore (2026-03-27 11:15:23+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:180496943
NeisBot (2026-03-26 18:09:50+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13682547910 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Dashcam store"
---
Misalnya, versi teks yang lebih netral dan faktual bisa jadi: "Toko dashcam"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisAgent (2026-03-27 05:33:15+00:00): 🕵 The mentioned node appears to be part of a highway=*

Businesses are usually mapped as standalone nodes (or within building polygons), rather than as part of a road geometry.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-22 13:57:03+00:00): Cleaned up remaining stray highway nodes added here (after SEO spam tags were already removed) in changeset 184433452

https://osm.org/changeset/184433452
iandees (2026-03-26 18:12:54+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11020120838 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180467860, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
iandees (2026-03-26 18:26:00+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8386514143 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180468622, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
rodolfovargas (2026-03-28 00:36:29+00:00): Buenos aportes. 
Continua mapeando : )
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-27 11:38:15+00:00): Hi,

I saw that several name:* tags were removed. Could you explain why those were deleted?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/454586796
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/408296886

Thanks.
bartgron (2026-03-26 20:46:36+00:00): Zestaw zmian został wycofany z powodu błędów.
Pozdrawiam
mueschel (2026-03-30 18:07:37+00:00): Hi,
you added the tag "migros = 5M" here - what does it mean?
user_23884811 (2026-03-30 19:13:17+00:00): the Migros brand in Turkey uses a number followed by M to express the size of supermarkets: There exists "Migros 2M"s, "Migros 3M"s, etc., 5M being the biggest. I believe this info should not be on the name tag, so i choose to use this tag instead.
NeisBot (2026-03-26 18:27:55+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13682632236 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Tree service company"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-04-03 22:33:21+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/180469258
eggie (2026-03-26 18:45:07+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback   Het is hier een boomgaard en die was al correct getagd. Het is geen heide of bos.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-03-26 18:55:43+00:00): Teruggedraaid....
eggie (2026-03-26 18:54:59+00:00): Teruggedraaid...   
Svp niet alles in parken of bos veranderen
Michael Collins (2026-04-10 15:53:01+00:00): Best practice is to make buildings rectangular with the "q" key or circular with the "o" key, unless they are distinctly not a regular shape.
SurfBalBay News (2026-03-27 01:14:38+00:00): Good edit for Miami Beach, but I do believe that Node 6027454663 (13401 Collins Avenue) should be marked as Miami since that land is County owned and that is the county seat municipality.
richlv (2026-03-26 19:00:56+00:00): Sveiki, liels paldies par kartes papildināšanu.

Vai https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1493184058 ir kāds nosaukums latviski?
markalex- (2026-03-26 22:29:17+00:00): I don't get what happened with bus stop.
Why did you append "Bus Station" to its name? I'm doubtful sign was changed to append English phrase here. 
Meta comments should not be included into names: it's already tagged as bus stop, so adding words into name are not needed (unless it's indeed called that, for example on the sign)

Second, is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1493184059 really a building=garage? Latest aerial photos (which are outdated) show amenity=parking there. Were garages build there instead? Seems to close to primary school. Also, are they really called otopark?
richlv (2026-05-16 16:25:07+00:00): Nosaukums šķita ne tik īsts, pagaidām noņemts.
eggie (2026-03-26 18:54:12+00:00): landuse hersteld
HurricaneGator (2026-04-10 21:20:12+00:00): Hello Sam Jayah, 

I noticed you’ve been updating ref tagging in Sri Lanka and referenced the Road Development Authority, so I wanted to ask about a couple of specific edits. For way (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/151574160), the ref was changed from AA004 to A4. However, Mapillary imagery (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=459242298703748) shows the route signed as AA004 (from 2018), and the RDA website (https://rda.gov.lk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=24&Itemid=123&lang=en#class-aa-roads) also lists it as AA004.

Additionally, I saw ref=B653 added along the dual carriageway from (http://openstreetmap.org/way/258498475) to (http://openstreetmap.org/way/884175132). However, Mapillary imagery from November 11, 2023 (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1491813521721679) doesn’t appear to show a route number on the signage there. The RDA site (https://rda.gov.lk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=24&Itemid=123&lang=en#class-b-roads) lists B653 as “Battaramulla Bypass Road,” while the ways it was applied to are tagged as “Polduwa Road.”

Would you be able to provide any insight or resources used to add these refs? Thank you and happy mapping!
Kamil Kalata (2026-03-26 20:03:25+00:00): Witaj!
Cieszę się, że postanowiłeś dołączyć do społeczności OpenStreetMap. Na Twoją prośbę sprawdziłem Twoje zmiany.
Najpoważniejszym błędem jest umieszczenie nazw opisowych w tagu "name", m. in. dla przyszkolnego placu zabaw (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13682734372/history/1) czy drogi prowadzącej nad Wisłę (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/44888950/history/10). W przypadku placu tag "leisure=playground", który dodałeś, w zupełności wystarcza; nazwa drogi wygląda na czysto zwyczajową, będącą skutkiem "rzutu okiem na mapę", więc nie powinna być w ogóle dodawana. Więcej na ten temat możesz przeczytać na stronie wiki OSM (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_praktyki#:~:text=Nie%20u%C5%BCywaj%20tagu%20name%20do%20opisywania%20rzeczy).
Mam wątpliwości wobec dodania przez Ciebie przyszkolnej biblioteki (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13682734371). Jako będącą częścią szkoły, nie dodawałbym jej w ogóle, a jeżeli bym to zrobił, dodałbym tag access=private; zakładam tutaj, że ta biblioteka jest dostępna tylko dla uczniów. Ponadto, tejże biblioteki dotyczy błąd nazwy opisowej.
Nazwa operatora obiektów przyszkolnych jest uproszczona; w RSPO można znaleźć pełną nazwę tej szkoły (https://rspo.gov.pl/institutions/5948).
Nazwa operatora parkingu przykościelnego (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13682734367) jest niezbyt poprawna, jako że zawiera skrótowy opis parafii, a ponadto został wskazany kościół, który nie jest samodzielną jednostką. 
Popełniłeś błąd techniczny przy dodawaniu godzin otwarcia sklepu ABC (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13682734363). Nie chcę Ciebie tu obwiniać, gdyż edytor iD, za pomocą którego wykonałeś tę zmianę, nie ma wygodnego panelu graficznego do ich dodawania, nad czym ubolewam. Polecam jednak to narzędzie: https://projets.pavie.info/yohours. Ponadto, osobiście nie dodawałbym członu "Sklep spożywczo-przemysłowy", jako będący nazwą opisową.
Popełniłeś błąd techniczny przy dodawaniu przystanku autobusowego (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13682734375); dodałeś go do granicy obszaru zabudowy mieszkaniowej (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1482598180), a powinien być samodzielnym węzłem.
Ciekawi mnie, czy parking w zatoczce (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13682734368) jest nim w rzeczywistości. Patrząc na zdjęcia lotnicze, wygląda mi on na zatoczkę autobusową, tym bardziej, że w jego sąsiedztwie jest wiata (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13682734373).
Niemniej jednak dziękuję, że postanowiłeś ulepszyć Gliny Małe w OSM. Twoja zmiana może stanowić impuls do jeszcze lepszego odwzorowania; być może dokonasz tego Ty.
eggie (2026-03-26 18:53:30+00:00): reverted wegen schade veroorzaken

Wijzigingenset #180470097

Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=180469531
eggie (2026-03-26 18:51:32+00:00): Beste  Zou je willen stoppen met van alles en nog wat zomaar te veranderen
MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-03-26 18:49:10+00:00): Terug gedraaid naar grass
eggie (2026-03-26 18:47:58+00:00): reverted by changeset Wijzigingenset #180469783

Dit is geen bos of park. wat is je bedoeling.
Realiseer je dat alles op de kaat van OSM terecht komt
eggie (2026-03-26 19:07:33+00:00): Wees even voorzichtig met het aanbrengen van nieuwe edits. 
Mocht je op deze manier doorgaan zal er overwogen worden een (tijdelijke) stop op je account te plaatsen. 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Data_working_group


MVG
eggie
Szymson (2026-03-26 19:20:54+00:00): No tak to na pewno nie robimy. Po co te duplikaty landuse (cmentarz)?
grzegorz75jan (2026-03-26 20:03:23+00:00): Mnie zafascynował wspaniały opis zmian "zmiany na mapie".
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
bartgron (2026-03-26 20:38:47+00:00): Prawdopodobnie jeden ze studentów, dzisiaj tego pełno i wszędzie beznadziejne opisy zmian
NeisBot (2026-03-26 18:48:41+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 8 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1462454838 v3 | 8 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180469631
iandees (2026-03-26 19:08:58+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13456125167 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180470914, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
rajdhani (2026-03-30 00:31:25+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:180607463
iandees (2026-03-26 19:09:03+00:00): Hi! It looks like the website URL on way/52468452 may have been copied from Google Maps (it contained Google tracking parameters). Please be careful not to copy information from Google into OpenStreetMap, as Google's data is copyrighted.
NeisBot (2026-03-26 18:51:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13682764719 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "digital marketing agency"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-04-03 22:33:24+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/180470388
mueschel (2026-03-31 13:09:28+00:00): Hi,
you added some uncommon keys here: 
czech_heritage_id
czech_monument_catalogue_number
drobne_pamatky_id


In general, id numbers are tagged as 'ref:CZ:abcd'  with the optional location code where they are used and 'abcd' as a common abbreviation.

E.g. "ref:drobne_pamatky" is already used many times.
NeisBot (2026-03-26 19:00:55+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13682764719 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Office building"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-03 22:33:30+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180832925
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
NeisBot (2026-03-26 19:03:51+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 7 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1275687427 v2 | 7 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180470453
NeisReview (2026-04-03 22:33:52+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/180576618
bartgron (2026-03-26 20:27:41+00:00): Zestaw zmian został wycofany z powodu błędów.
Pozdrawiam
Znaika (2026-06-21 17:47:15+00:00): Hi, ich habe die Umrisse zurück geändert. So ist es richtig.
rempshaener (2026-06-21 18:11:28+00:00): Hallo,
die komplexen baulichen Strukturen im mittleren Bereich (dieses Gewirr mit Treppen, Aufzug etc.) können gerne als building:part separiert werden, nur darf das nicht außerhalb des Grundrisses liegen.

Viele Grüße
Znaika (2026-06-21 18:19:44+00:00): Hi, 
so ist es jetzt definiert, nur um es zu differenzieren, weil Balkonen z.B auch nicht zu Umrissen gehören.
VG, Z.
rempshaener (2026-06-22 18:09:21+00:00): Danke dir
Kovoschiz (2026-03-27 08:03:47+00:00): Can you explain what's "inconsistent"? In HK, `=village` is better used for distinct individual villages. There are already `=hamlet` here.
Kovoschiz (2026-03-27 08:04:31+00:00): And you still made it inconsistent, as there are `*:suburb=`
felipeeugenio (2026-03-26 19:43:31+00:00): Hola. si un camino es privado, agregar access=private. Si además tiene un portón u otro tipo de barrera, que el tag access sea a partir del portón.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180471749
aparra09 (2026-03-26 20:15:35+00:00): Hola. Vale, lo haré. Gracias!

Saludos!
Buraddo (2026-03-27 13:54:05+00:00): Hello, there are no crossings here, neither legal and safe way to cross at those points, neither commonly used by pedestrians. Why did you mark those pathways?