piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2025-10-30 13:48:39+00:00): Hello, thank you for your contribution.

Your changeset was commented because it appears to follow a pattern that could be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related.

Could you kindly confirm if your map edits were intentional?

#MapWithoutSpam #URLs
NeisRevert (2025-10-30 14:00:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173978221
where the changeset comment is: 
Remove spam
Baloo Uriza (2025-10-30 16:23:23+00:00): I'm not seeing any evidence on Bing or Esri aerials that this abandoned right of way exists anymore. Do you have updated imagery that shows it?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173977694
ScottWalkerAU (2025-10-31 09:46:14+00:00): The building is meant to be joined with adjacent buildings, you should not have separated it when attempting to fix the intersection. I recommend you also square corners where appropriate, as the quality has been degraded
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173977879
fortera_au (2025-10-31 23:27:43+00:00): I've reverted this due to the incorrect change and loss of existing data

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174042290
Baloo Uriza (2025-10-30 16:23:14+00:00): I'm not seeing any evidence on Bing or Esri aerials that this abandoned right of way exists anymore. Do you have updated imagery that shows it?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173977894
Isopycnic (2025-10-30 17:03:44+00:00): I was doing some cleanup and added some abandoned rail using usgs 3d elevation program data and compared it to esri data.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-31 01:44:21+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13270317180
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13270317183
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13270317185
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13270317186
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13270317188
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13270317189
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13270317191
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13270317193

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Comino (2025-10-30 17:31:34+00:00): Hi,

In your edit, you used many incorrect and deprecated tags.

Street addresses in all capital letters are not allowed; please update it.

Please DELETE the currency:BTC=yes tag (it does not exist).

Please change the name to: To The Moon.

Update the opening hours.
Please use the correct format: https://projets.pavie.info/yohours/

Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag.
Use "currency:XBT=yes" instead.
Please DELETE the payment:ethereum=yes tag.

The description tag reads like an advertisement, which is not allowed. Please update it.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description
The description=* tag can be used to provide additional information about the related element to the end-user of the map. It should be short—a few words or maybe one to three sentences at most. Only neutral and factual information is allowed. Do not include subjective evaluations, for example, "the best restaurant in the city." Do not use the tag for advertising messages.

You are not using the correct phone number syntax; please update it.

For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Merchants#tagging-guidance
and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bitcoin

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
https://btcmap.org/tagger/6794624
rskedgell (2025-10-30 15:34:45+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for adding the restaurant. Has this replaced "Slurp", previously mapped at 17 Frith Street?
YomanNH (2025-10-30 14:22:50+00:00): Hej,
na pewno zmieniłeś to co trzeba? Uwaga jest przy innym moście.
kubahahaha (2025-10-30 18:27:01+00:00): Faktycznie, nie wiem jak mogłem się tak pomylić.
Wycofane
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173990201
Frans S (2026-04-17 10:26:44+00:00): You mapped this task on October 30, 2025. Sorry that I react after this time, but there are many issues that I want to share with you. 
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she deliver high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (See attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------

Issues found on your mappings
A: Inaccurate mapping. 
E: Buildings not squared or rounded.
High building(s) incorrectly mapped. 
Check this footage on how to map high buildings: https://youtu.be/dsfUcslLtVc?si=yH6eWDbsb_ILAVb9
 Or see par. 20, chapter About Buildings.

Explanation can be found in this document, which might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards, and keep mapping!
Frans S
rempshaener (2025-10-30 18:34:03+00:00): Hallo,

du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Aus technischer Sicht laufen nun das admin_centre (Röthenbach) und der name (Röthenbach (Allgäu)) der boundary-Relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/959855 auseinander. Das ist in der Regel problematisch.

Aus inhaltlicher Sicht möchte ich ebenfalls zur Vorsicht mahnen.
Der von dir angepasst Node hatte bereits folgende Namen:
- Röthenbach (Allgäu)
- Röthenbach
- Röthenbach im Allgäu
Davon erscheint kein Eintrag evident falsch oder richtig.

Auch die angegebene Website ist nicht wirklich hilfreich: Bereits in der Begrüßung steht „Röthenbach im Allgäu“. Im Siegel hier https://daten2.verwaltungsportal.de/dateien/seitengenerator/zur_regelung_von_fragen_des_oertl._gem.verfassungsrecht.pdf steht „Röthenbach (Allgäu)“.
Zweifelsfrei dürfte das nur die Gemeinde selbst klären können.

Bei Fragen bitte melden.
Viele Grüße
CoreForce (2025-10-30 20:20:03+00:00): Auf dem Ortsschild steht nur Röthenbach. Dies ist die offizielle der "Gemeinde Röthenbach".

Ich denke, es wäre für die Nutzer hilfreich, wenn sie von der Karte auf die Realität schliessen können.

Die Begriffe "(Allgäu)" oder "im Allgäu" werden bei vielen Orten im Allgäu als sprachlicher Zusatz verwendet, meist auf touristischen Zwecken. Dieser Zusatz ist jedoch reich sprachlich, nicht amtlich.
Baloo Uriza (2025-10-30 16:22:23+00:00): I'm not seeing any evidence on Bing or Esri aerials that this abandoned right of way exists anymore.  Do you have updated imagery that shows it?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173979076
Negreheb (2025-10-30 16:19:28+00:00):  Reverted after discussion with OP in the chat osm-de on their own wish https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173984946
eggie (2025-10-30 14:53:13+00:00): Algemeen

access:conditional=no @ (sunset-sunrise)
Wanneer het alleen voor wandelaars geldt dan
foot:conditional=no @ (sunset-sunrise)

MVG
eggie
vicente lopez 2021 (2025-10-30 16:48:37+00:00): https://prensa.cba.gov.ar/gobernador/llaryora-habilito-el-segundo-tramo-de-la-duplicacion-de-la-avenida-padre-luchesse/
Nikita Moiseev (2026-01-09 11:08:05+00:00): Добрый день Марьяна. В данном пакете правок вы наложили сточную канаву на существующие постройки создав 28 проблем. Данная корректировка не является корректной, прошу исправьте данные проблемы и проверьте имеется ли данная стоная канава на самом деле. Благодарю!
Maryna Konan (2026-01-12 06:29:27+00:00): Здравствуйте, Никита! Спасибо, что обратили внимание на допущенную ошибку. В настоящее время данная проблема уже исправлена.
Еще раз спасибо!
Baloo Uriza (2025-10-30 16:18:44+00:00): Please refrain from incorrectly tagging turn lanes.  If you're not able to determine the legal moves from a particular lane, don't map lanes at all.  Adding inaccurate information does everyone a disservice.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173979714
Negreheb (2025-10-30 16:19:27+00:00):  Reverted after discussion with OP in the chat osm-de on their own wish https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173984946
ChrissW-R1 (2026-04-17 17:57:37+00:00): Please check https://osm.org/note/5254266
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:44:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321614 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Turkey
SafwatHalaby (2025-11-07 08:12:42+00:00): שלום. מדוע המרפאה נמחקה? בשינוי הקודם הצעתי להעביר אותה להיות סימון על הבניין, אבל כאן היא נמחקה כליל. תרצה שאוסיף אותה בצורה תקינה לבניין?

דיון קודם: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173930834
ממפהX (2025-11-07 13:19:57+00:00): יש לבינין הזה 3 קומות ורק בקומה העלינה יש מרפאה
SafwatHalaby (2025-11-11 07:23:22+00:00): עדיין ניתן למפות את זה. מוסיפים נקודה (ולא פולוגין) מסוג clinic בתוך הבניין.

כדאי גם לתייג את הקומה (אבל לא חובה):

בצד שמאל, תחת אזור ה-tags, מוסיפים

level=2

כי ב-osm קומת הקרקע היא 0

יש דרכים יותר מדויקות למפות בדיוק את המבנה הפנימי של הבניין, אבל זה יותר מתקדם
Frans S (2025-11-08 11:46:40+00:00): HEllo. Thanks for mapping.
Well mapped.
Please do not connect nodes of a hedge to a highway. These connections are errors and need to be modified.
Best regards
Comino (2025-10-30 17:35:19+00:00): Hi,

In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes".

Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag !
Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead.

For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Merchants#tagging-guidance
and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bitcoin

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
https://btcmap.org/tagger/6794624
AndyB_66 (2025-10-30 15:18:22+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
marc__marc (2026-02-15 23:50:24+00:00): Bonjour,
merci pour ces ajouts.
mais ce que tu as renseignés sont des bornes d'une station et non 3 stations (la staiton était l'ensemble des bornes d'un même opérateur à un endroit donné).
J'ai fais la correction.
Cordialement,
Marc
Anaximandre (2026-02-16 10:14:59+00:00): Bonjour,
Merci beaucoup ! J'ai utilisé streetcomplete, je ferai attention la prochaine fois aux tags, cela ne semble pas adapté.
marc__marc (2026-02-16 10:25:17+00:00): Merci pour ton retour.
c'est pas une question de tag, c'est une question de modélisation :
station de recharge : il n'y en a qu'une à un endroit donné
borne de recharge : il y en a une ou plusieurs pour chaque station
je viens de regarder dans mon SCEE, les 2 objets sont présent
AndyB_66 (2025-10-30 15:18:16+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
Lokai (2025-11-05 13:44:10+00:00): Hallo,

der Weg wurde von service auf cycleway geändert.
Welche Beschilderung ist am Weg aufgestellt bitte?

Gruß
Lokai
PMhixZu9 (2025-11-05 16:38:36+00:00): Beschilderung aktualisiert, Durchfahrt verboten für Fahrzeuge aller Art, Fahrräder frei
Ruben Van de Velde (2025-11-08 21:45:15+00:00): Hoi JoL, je hebt hier een aantal nodes toegevoegd met bench=yes ten noorden van het WGC. Moesten deze amenity=bench zijn? Dank
JoL (2025-11-10 15:49:08+00:00): Ja, klopt, amenity=bench
Ruben Van de Velde (2025-11-10 19:25:22+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174479537
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:38:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321363 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Bosnia and Herzegovina
eggie (2025-10-30 16:15:14+00:00): Dag Gemirt. 

Bedankt voor je bijdrage.

Gebruik svp de adresnode om op bij te taggen.
Geen spaties in postcode.
Ik pas even wat aan.

MVG
eggie
JeroenHoek (2025-10-31 14:06:15+00:00): Die Grenze is trouwens geen shop=chemist, maar shop=variety. Ze hebben wel drogisterijartikelen, maar geen vast assortiment en vooral partijen aan spul.
eggie (2025-10-30 16:11:06+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Negreheb (2025-10-30 16:19:30+00:00):  Reverted after discussion with OP in the chat osm-de on their own wish https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173984946
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-01-29 13:38:01+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13270556241/history has bicycle_parking = arceaux that was added in this edit
what bicycle_parking=arceaux means? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bicycle_parking - is this parking matching any value described there?
Chemins du Mellois (2026-01-29 14:57:26+00:00): Bonjour, je ne comprend pas le sens de votre interrogation. L'élément que j'ai ajouté correspond pour moi à un parking vélo composé de 2 arceaux pouvant accueillir 4 vélos.
Cordialement
Jean-Paul
VictorIE (2025-12-29 01:38:41+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10557367113/history

You seem to have merged a street light and a traffic light. Someone might be able to revert this.
Frans S (2025-11-02 14:45:24+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
Issues found on your mappings

A: Inaccurate mapping. 

B: Overlapping buildings.

C: Collecting adjacent buildings and mapped it as 1 building.

D: Connecting Nodes to other features.

E: Buildings not squared or rounded.
H: Included a yard of clearing.


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173981800
Frans S (2025-11-02 14:45:53+00:00): Bad shaped and clustered buildings are removed and need to be mapped from scratch
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173981800
4004 (2025-11-02 00:28:19+00:00): добры дзень, дзякуй за праўку.
building=demolished лепш рабіць як was:building=*
artagonist (2025-11-03 12:16:09+00:00): Добры дзень, 
Дзякуй, улічу
Baloo Uriza (2025-10-30 16:20:43+00:00): Please refrain from incorrectly tagging turn lanes. If you're not able to determine the legal moves from a particular lane, don't map lanes at all. Adding inaccurate information does everyone a disservice.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173982054
skumarchandela_lyft (2025-10-31 14:34:04+00:00): Hi Baloo!
My name is Sumit and I’m a mapper in the OSM team at Lyft.
There are different approaches on the OSM for adding turn:lanes. Our general approach is to add lanes and turn:lanes tags only when there are visible turn markings on the road or signs showing possible turns.
In this changeset, I only saw a marking for a left turn, so I used left|none. Your approach also makes sense — from the last lane, you can go through and right. We have also started a forum discussion on that topic (https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/consensus-regarding-lane-and-turn-lane-tagging-guidelines/133364) outlining our approach in more details and will be glad to participate in the discussion further there.
Thanks for your comment and your contribution to OSM! 
Best regards,
Sumit
Baloo Uriza (2025-11-01 15:53:28+00:00): Please don't be condescending.  I'm trying to help you out as a more senior contributor.  If you don't want to be useful, please leave.
eggie (2025-10-30 18:10:23+00:00): Fah ytacaa..

Niet name gebruiken om iets te beschrijven. Het symbool moet het doen.
MVG
eggie
brassica (2025-10-30 20:49:46+00:00): Pardon. Ik zal erop letten.
eggie (2025-10-30 16:12:15+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
SomeoneElse (2025-11-30 19:28:19+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!,

On this changeset you've used a "source=Google Maps" tag. We can't actually use that as a source in OSM because Google's licence doesn't allow it to be used here - it would cause real problems for the project if we were found to be using Google Maps as a source.
If this is somewhere that you are familiar with, then "source=local_knowledge" would be perfectly OK. If not, we'll have to undo this change.

Best Regards
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group
eggie (2025-10-30 18:18:49+00:00): dan dus access:conditioinal= no @ (sunset - sunrise_ 

Er zit overigens geen pad vast aan dat hek.
eggie (2025-10-30 18:19:53+00:00): access=no betekent gewoon Verboden Toegang voor iedereen....
Ik heb die tag verwijderd
Comino (2025-10-30 17:30:55+00:00): Hi,

In your edit, you used many incorrect and deprecated tags.

Street addresses in all capital letters are not allowed; please update it.

Please DELETE the currency:BTC=yes tag (it does not exist).

Please change the name to: To The Moon.

Update the opening hours.
Please use the correct format: https://projets.pavie.info/yohours/

Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag.
Use "currency:XBT=yes" instead.
Please DELETE the payment:ethereum=yes tag.

The description tag reads like an advertisement, which is not allowed. Please update it.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description
The description=* tag can be used to provide additional information about the related element to the end-user of the map. It should be short—a few words or maybe one to three sentences at most. Only neutral and factual information is allowed. Do not include subjective evaluations, for example, "the best restaurant in the city." Do not use the tag for advertising messages.

For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Merchants#tagging-guidance
and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bitcoin

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
https://btcmap.org/tagger/6794624
maro21 (2025-10-31 21:15:41+00:00): ???
Is it a copy-paste message? There aren't any opening_hours or description tags in my edit, so I think your message isn't addressed to me.
dvdhoven (2025-10-30 16:05:30+00:00): Ik heb de wandelroutes omgelegd naar het nieuwe fietspad
keesm (2025-10-30 20:09:42+00:00): Mooi Dick, ik zag wel iets van een wandelrelatie op een zijstuk, maar kwam er niet helemaal uit. Zal het nog eens analyseren.
Bedankt
Gr
Kees
Pete Owens (2025-11-01 00:50:31+00:00): The markings indicate the opposite:
The arrow indicates that cyclists coming across the crossing MUST turn right onto the cycleway. There is another arrow on the cycleway indicating that cyclists coming the other way must turn left onto the crossing. You can see the markings more clearly on this steetview image from 2009:
https://maps.app.goo.gl/XLQgZjei4uJxRVxDA
BER319 (2025-11-02 13:36:49+00:00): Hallo Openminded320,
das sieht ja schon besser aus. Ein Tipp die
Gebäude bitte nach Abschluss rechtwinklig machen.
Sollte im ID auch die Taste Q bei selektierten Gebäude sein.
Es sei denn es ist wirklich schief gebaut.
Danke und Gruß BER319
BER319 (2025-11-02 13:46:00+00:00): PS
das Q kann natürlich auch für alles andere was rechtwinklig ist verwendet werden.
meongseolin (2025-10-31 15:03:54+00:00): 您好，请问你为什么把洋湖区域的道路等级提高？
user_23452626 (2025-10-31 16:56:47+00:00): 控规为次干道
user_5359 (2025-11-01 08:34:33+00:00): Hello! Please have alook on https://www.osm.org/node/3901344452. What ist the mean of the booth tags
ЭХНТ = Эмийн бөөний төв
Эмийн сан = Эмийн сан
?
vng_me (2025-10-30 17:08:40+00:00): Coastlines are broken with this change ..
OSM Warrior (2025-10-30 17:57:16+00:00):  Thanks - I see you fixed it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/2977486/history 

Sorry about that was having problems with OSM editor doing some weird overlay of text and not accepting changes submitted.
vng_me (2025-10-30 18:05:32+00:00): No problem, I've already fixed.
joost schouppe (2025-11-05 16:14:06+00:00): Mag de fixme hier dan niet weg?
Jakka (2025-11-05 16:28:23+00:00): Werken Plaats en Larsstraat nog niet beëindigd.
Zal bekijken op welke delen het overbodig werd.
Mogelijke kleine verplaatsing as midden weg zal moeten aangepast worden. Luchtbeelden. grb loopt achter met werkelijkheid
vng_me (2025-10-30 18:01:15+00:00): natural=coastline специфический тег, пожалуйста, прочитайте wiki, прежде чем его назначать.
Prius5678 (2025-10-30 18:26:55+00:00): Спасибо! Изучу и поправлю
vng_me (2025-10-30 18:39:59+00:00): Отлично! Я пока удалил natural=coastline. Вкратце, он предназначен для материк - море/океан.
maro21 (2025-10-31 21:17:58+00:00): What is the source of this edit? The path was added on October 2, 2024 and the imagery you used is from May 2024.
Helmchen42 (2025-10-30 16:26:21+00:00): Hydrogeography in north WY, US
Amin cafenet (2025-10-30 16:27:26+00:00): سرویس دهی همه ی خدمات در کمترین زمان ممکن
brassica (2025-10-30 16:40:20+00:00): Gaat iets mis met de omtrek markeren
eggie (2025-10-30 17:01:39+00:00): Yep.. Het overlapt elkaar.

name=tuin hoort ook niet op een kaart.
natural=openbare tuin is ook geen valide tag.

Kijk eens hier https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=garden

MVG
EGGIE
eggie (2025-10-30 18:08:28+00:00): Ik ben toch benieuwd of je wat doet met de gevraagde feedback.
Je gaat inmiddels weer door met nieuwe wijzigingen? 
Denk dat deze wijzigingen beter teruggedraaid kunnen worden. 

Met name=...  zijn we voorzichtig.
We zetten geen beschrijvingen met naam op de kaart. Dus geen name=huis, bankje, boom, tuin , openbare tuin. e.d 

Dat hoort allemaal niet op een kaart.
Hier wat richtlijnen hoe te mappen..
Good practice   
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Good_practice

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-10-30 18:14:37+00:00): Ik heb wat aangepast wat niet klopt.

Mapse
eggie
eggie (2025-10-30 18:15:31+00:00): De polygoon van tuin was niet gesloten. Nu wel.
brassica (2025-10-30 20:37:56+00:00): Verzoek aan de mapper van de huidige grens om te checken welk gebied Tivolituin is. Bij mijn weten vallen Mulderstraat speeltuin en de voetbalkooi er buiten.
eggie (2025-10-30 20:45:03+00:00): 
In dat geval kun je de naam op het tuingedeelte zetten en niet op dat parkvlak.
Je kunt het ook aan Lachgast vragen. Dat is de voorgaande mapper. 
Je kunt ook een opmerking op de kaart zetten. Dan kan een lokale mapper het oppakken. 
Mapse
eggie
brassica (2025-10-30 21:25:58+00:00): Excuus voor het ongemak. Ik zal ga die Good practice pagina lezen.
De Tivolituin is een openbare tuin in zelfbeheer, en er zijn er meer, zie bijv https://www.nieuws030.nl/varia/groene-zelfbeheerprojecten-in-utrecht-x/  Is hier een categorie voor, of aan te vragen?
eggie (2025-10-30 21:31:59+00:00): Hoi.. ik heb het al eerder aangepast door mij naar community_garden.
Het zal dus nu correct zijn.
Je kunt evt de naam toevoegen en dan van het grote vlak de naam verwijderen.
Kijk ook even in de wiki welke type tuinen er zijn.
Mapse
eggie (2025-10-30 21:33:55+00:00): Het tendert nu ook als tuin.. want er zat een los eindje aan. Dat heb ik verwijderd.
OSM is echt lastig in het begin. Er zijn zoveel mogelijkheden. Dan zie je door de bomen het bos niet meer.
eggie (2025-10-30 21:34:50+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:garden:type
brassica (2025-10-30 21:42:15+00:00): Thanks
Pink Duck (2025-10-31 13:56:00+00:00): Have the 40 mph average speed cams gone then?