piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Jordi MF (2026-01-22 14:57:55+00:00): Hola jomiroca,

Según las instrucciones de la wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Comunitat_Valenciana#Nombres_de_las_v%C3%ADas_urbanas), los nombres de calle de Manises deben de escribirse en valenciano. Además, hay que tene en cuenta que las placas de la calle están escritas en valenciano. Por supuesto, es correcto añadir la traducción al castellano name:es.

Corrijo de nuevo el nombre de "name". Saludos
AndyB_66 (2026-01-22 12:44:37+00:00): Mapa OSM służy do obrazowania obiektów faktycznie istniejących w terenie. Brak przejścia czy dostępności nie jest powodem, dla którego owe obiekty należy z mapy usunąć - co najwyżej zaznaczyć tagiem "access=no". Dalsze Twoje postępowanie w ten sposób poskutkuje banem. Zmiana wycofana.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177562900
walter10-2 (2026-02-04 03:23:03+00:00): Welcome to mapping on OSM!
It looks like these two galleries are in the wrong spot on the map. You may have intended to put them within this building: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/98250784
Additionally, addr:street is meant for the street name only, in unabbreviated form (i.e. “Taunton Road East”). You can put the other pieces of info under addr:housenumber, addr:city, addr:province, and addr:postcode.
kohiwonomu (2026-01-23 01:28:24+00:00): Hi, could you clarify what you mean by the valet=yes tag, and what exactly this node is supposed to represent? Is it a business? An ATM?
Rockedf (2026-01-23 03:18:59+00:00): I replied to you in a private message.
woodpeck (2026-01-22 13:43:36+00:00): Please do not apply source tags to individual buildings, having them on the changeset is sufficient. I said the same to another project member yesterday. Please make sure this information is communicated to all other project members. 

Please use good changeset comments. Especially when deleting things (like here, walls), "#hotosm-project-39210 #JUBAInfrastructureDigitization2026 #OMDTZ" is not a sufficient description of your edit and risks a revert of the whole edit.
arjunaraoc (2026-03-20 05:27:12+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Your deletion is not clear, as the road is clearly visible in Bing imagery
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177563502
Mana ooru mall (2026-03-22 04:01:05+00:00): Hi, thanks for reviewing.

The location is near coordinates 16.8635649, 81.2451447. I live very close to this place and have verified on ground that there is no public road here.

This appears to be either outdated imagery or a misinterpretation of a private path/land. Currently, it is not a usable road.

Please let me know if any additional verification is needed.
Mana ooru mall (2026-03-22 04:05:15+00:00): 
I have also checked on Google Maps, and this road is not present there as well.
arjunaraoc (2026-03-23 00:56:55+00:00): Thanks for clarifying. Probably it was added from  satellite image. Please mention source as "local knowledge" for such edits. Also please use name tag for English and name:te for Telugu labels.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177563502
Mana ooru mall (2026-03-23 02:13:58+00:00): Hi, thank you for reviewing and for the guidance.

I will mention the source as "local knowledge" for such edits and follow the proper naming tags in future.

Thanks again!
TrickyFoxy (2026-04-05 11:09:46+00:00): 👋 Будьте аккуратнее с копированием объектов. Вы добавили 17 домов с номером 34Ж. Исправил.
tkk (2026-01-23 05:17:50+00:00): Ahoj, opravoval jsem tebou vytvořený rozcestník pro kola na Rullerove nabrezi (https://openstreetmap.org/node/13476476086). Cisla na techto cedulich jsou ref trasy, ne rozcestniku. Nemas nahodou od toho prvku fotku? Mozna jsou tam dalsi veci, ktere by bylo dobre udelat jinak. Diky Tom.K
紬ヴェンダース (2026-01-23 23:23:22+00:00): 鉄道のタグ付けに関しては、OpenRailwayMap (ORM) のガイドラインが世界共通の標準となっています。 データの正確性を維持するため、個別の判断ではなく、ORMの基準を遵守していただくようお願いいたします。
NeisBot (2026-01-23 06:54:58+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13476487779 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Dental office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-30 07:09:15+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177876612
(No visible changes after review)
aaronq227 (2026-02-02 19:12:56+00:00): Hi ftcat,
I noticed you changed name=Hammarskjoeld Drive to ref=Hammarskjoeld Drive. The OSM Wiki states that "ref tags are usually used for reference numbers or codes” (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ref), while old_name=* tags are "used for old / previous / historic name(s)” (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:old_name).  I was wondering if you could share any resources used to make this edit or if you meant to use old_name=Hammarskjoeld Drive. 

Thank you for your time and I look forward to hearing from you.
ftcat (2026-02-02 19:52:23+00:00): Hi aaronq227,

It is just an error on my part. The tag should be name=Hammarskjoeld Drive. A previous mapper had tagged with old pre-independence names and I was changing them to the old_name tag. The road is named after Dag Hammarskjoeld, if you are interested you should Google the name to see the significance.
aaronq227 (2026-02-04 16:00:28+00:00): Hi ftcat,

Thank you for your knowledge and making updates to the area.
ne-lux (2026-01-27 16:22:27+00:00): Hi McRapp, du hast aus Versehen den Straßentyp entfernt. Die Straße ist jetzt nur noch eine Line, demnach endet die Straße in Oberhub. Schau dir das bitte nochmal an.
McRapp (2026-01-29 13:00:03+00:00): Hallo ne-Lux, danke für den Hinweis. Ich habe gerade nochmal reingeschaut, aber bei mir wird wird es noch als Verbindungsstraße angezeigt. Ich hatte eigentlich nur den Geschwindigkeit angepasst. Ich kann leider nicht erkennen, was ich am Straßentyp geändert habe bzw. wie ich das korrigieren kann.
ne-lux (2026-01-29 13:11:44+00:00): Hi McRapp, ich hatte das direkt nach meinem Kommentar in einem weiteren Changeset korrigiert. Bei Bikerouter und so konnte man nämlich nicht mehr von Oberhub Richtung Schöneberg fahren ;)
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-23 04:52:11+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2490336807
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1469489573

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
AndyB_66 (2026-01-26 10:10:23+00:00): reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177713448
trigpoint (2026-02-13 18:24:53+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/178516522
rskedgell (2026-01-23 00:08:49+00:00): Unfortunately, we can't use Royal Mail as a source for OpenStreetMap.

https://www.royalmail.com/terms-website
"6. Intellectual property rights
6.1 All intellectual property rights in this website, and the material contained on it, are owned or licensed by us."
rempshaener (2026-01-22 18:41:55+00:00): Hallo,

ich habe ein paar Anmerkungen zu deinen Bearbeitungen.
Davon ausgehend, dass das https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=787615518568955&focus=photo&x=0.7332860934807592&y=0.704218507662663&zoom=0&lat=52.115694099972&lng=10.021244299972&z=17 noch aktuell ist:
- colour: Der Hydrant ist nicht rot. Es geht um die Farbe, wie sie vor Ort tatsächlich ist, nicht um die Darstellung in Karten oder Apps.
- Die Nennweite passt nicht.
- fire_hydrant:position=green passt nicht, das wäre fire_hydrant:position=lane
- Die „ref“ ist ausschließlich die Hydrantennummer, die oben rechts auf dem Schild ausgewiesen ist. Dort steht nicht „H 1244 BS“
- Die Lage laut Luftbild passt nicht, dort steht ein Schaltschrank.

Bei Fragen bitte melden.
Viele Grüße
megamind6155 (2026-03-08 08:27:40+00:00): why did you add a point by your name onto the map?
Wanderer2000 (2026-01-23 08:47:45+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1469493440

Deze way moet amenity=parking zijn ipv parking_space lijkt me?
Taya_S (2026-01-23 10:14:24+00:00): Gelijk heb je! Bedankt voor de oplettendheid, ik heb het gecorrigeerd.
JezCrow (2026-01-22 19:50:03+00:00): - Has 17 Pinn Lane really been converted into a garage?
- I'd be surprised if a historic milestone was removed (node/1735381858)
- Please cease replacing street names with fictional names, I have changed way/1156857621 back to the previous name.
trigpoint (2026-02-13 18:24:41+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/178516522
SachaBe (2026-01-23 13:50:42+00:00): Hey, armchair-mapper here :)
I'd love to understand what was bluntly oversimplified so I can improve next time.
Thanks in advance ;)
bxl-forever (2026-01-23 14:23:48+00:00): Have you opened the Mapillary link in my changeset description?  I linked to a picture which shows what the path looks like.

The path does an interesting set of curves and on some parts there are two paths running in parallel.  Your changeset was undone because you changed that to redraw everything as a straight line, which is not the real situation.

I don’t want to discourage you because I know you certainly want to improve the map, but your recent edits aimed at mapping sidewalks and traffic islands across various places of Brussels contained a large number of mistakes, and the iD online editor encourages mappers to use incorrect tags, not to mention the problem of misaligned geometries.  Please take some time to inspect how things are mapped nowadays, and make sure to understand the difference between landuse and surface, and how traffic islands are better mapped as a single continuous area instead of small areas attached to each other, and also how kerbs are drawn (kerbs are directional).

Next time: if you want to ask questions, please use direct messages instead of commenting on changesets.

Happy mapping.
RaphaelPasloin (2026-01-22 15:18:16+00:00): Hello,

Why do you deleted https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1408276212 ? Please look on history and detailed information on previous changesets. It's look like you armchair mapping with old imagery. Please do not recreate the deleted cycleway here we will fix this with correct reverting tools to preserve history.

Have a good day,
Raphaël
gscholz (2026-03-14 07:19:41+00:00): Hi Jk488,
this changeset has left behind a broken postal code (0108) relation:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=44.78958&lat=41.70033&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19950847/history#map=15/41.70133/44.78824

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Jk488 (2026-03-15 13:02:10+00:00): Oops! It should be fixed now, thanks
gscholz (2026-03-15 13:15:43+00:00): Thanks for your quick response.
Guido
bxl-forever (2026-01-22 14:15:01+00:00): Why did you erase Raphael’s excellent work to map cycleways separately here?  (Which was been revised 2 months ago according to the latest situation, which differs from what UrbIS imagery shows.)

Merging cycleways and footways may be acceptable in the countryside but it looks like you are bringing us 10 years back in time.

Getting pedestrian navigation to route until the centre point of the intersection here (node 13476624845) looks even more absurd, given than we have mapped footways and crossing in great detail.  Looks like a confusion between the difference between pedestrians and cyclists.

Is that a new convention?  Did you discuss this way of mapping with other mappers?

Thanks in advance.
arjunaraoc (2026-03-20 05:29:11+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check my update https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180140118#map=19/14.191511/78.633408
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177566596
bxl-forever (2026-01-22 14:17:06+00:00): Merci pour l’ajout.

Votre changement indique que le sens unique s’applique pour tout le monde y compris pour les cyclistes.

Donc, pas de panneaux M2, c'est bien ça ?  Si c’est une erreur, nous pouvons vous aider à corriger.
bxl-forever (2026-01-22 14:32:40+00:00): Panneaux M2 visibles ici
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1522200912221477

Nous avons corrigé : ajout du tag "oneway:bicycle=no".
stasiu512 (2026-01-22 17:37:44+00:00): Cześć, co masz na myśli dając `source:addr=*`?
rempshaener (2026-01-22 18:14:41+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.
Du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.

Zu https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13476657288:
Wenn die Straße www.openstreetmap.org/way/152309691 durch einen Block versperrt ist, passen die access-Werte nicht zusammen; access=no (d. h. auch keine Fußgänger, Radfahrer) nur beim Block und nicht an der Straße passen nicht zusammen.

Zu https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13463839574:
Die Farbangabe müsste  in englischer Schreibweise erfolgen, d. h. „red“.
Und in diesem Fall eigentlich dann
colour=silver
bonnet:colour=red
Die Position passt laut Luftbild noch nicht so richtig.

Vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag und weiterhin viel Spaß beim Mappen.
Viele Grüße
NeisBot (2026-01-23 06:48:49+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 18 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1469504667 v1 | 18 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177567187
NeisReview (2026-01-30 07:09:24+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/177768880
NeisBot (2026-01-23 06:48:50+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 17 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1469504667 v1 | 17 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/13476686210 v2
https://osm.org/node/13476686211 v2
https://osm.org/node/13476686212 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177567263
Hoodiecrow (2026-01-23 19:16:14+00:00): This church's building was sold this summer, I don't think there is a church now
Hoodiecrow (2026-01-23 19:18:31+00:00): https://wilcoxnewspapers.com/saugatuck-umc-to-close-doors-after-160-years/
ion_chi (2026-01-23 22:57:25+00:00): Thanks for the heads up. Fixed here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177629224
Negreheb (2026-06-14 21:50:54+00:00): Hey, that bench is not near a streets, its on the street :D I will correct it.
NeisBot (2026-01-23 06:48:52+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 26 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1469504667 v2 | 19 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1469510457 v1 | 7 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177567751
NeisReview (2026-01-30 07:09:25+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/177768880
bxl-forever (2026-01-22 15:28:55+00:00): Hello.

Is this street one-way just for cars or one-way for *everyone*?  Your edit suggests cyclists are NOT allowed to ride against the direction of motor traffic, which is very rare in Brussels.
RaphaelPasloin (2026-02-25 14:01:10+00:00): En fait elle est defacto oneway pour la partie entre le 2 et 34 mais aucun panneau ! j'ai corrigé avec oneway:bicycle=no

Par contre cette partie : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1238600634#map=19/50.834613/4.367249&layers=N n'est absolument pas oneway ! https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1500572814918818 , venant de la Rue de la Tulipe non plus : https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1213056404333082

Soit c'est du fantaisy mapping soit c'est une situation projetée mais dans tout les cas, les modifications de ce changeset et ceux liés sont incorrect.
Tomas Straupis (2026-01-22 16:21:38+00:00): O čia tikrai parkingai, kurie realiai pažymėti kelio ženklu P? Nes aš ten taip vizualiai tai matau krūvas poligonų, kurie yra tiesiog vietos, kur tikėtina, kad prie namo bus statomi automobiliai.
bxl-forever (2026-01-23 13:54:31+00:00): Merci, mais ne pas oublier que les zones de recontre ont une limitation de vitesse à 20 km/h. Il faut donc AUSSI changer les tags maxspeed et source:maxspeed, pour que les applications d'itinéraire envoient la bonne info.

Nous avons corrigé l'erreur.
RaphaelPasloin (2026-02-25 13:49:48+00:00): Bonjour,

Est-ce  que les changements sont réellements effectif ou il s'agit d'une projection ? (on map la réalité sur OSM, on peut éventuellement ajouter proposed) mais j'ai de sérieux doute sur vos éditions : 

Athénée venant de ch. d'Ixelles : on a une fin de zone de rencontre : https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1206767828193655

On a bien un début de zone 20 ici https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1500572814918818 mais rien indiquant une zone de rencontre (ironiquement le panneau était présent au début des travaux, mais en version Française pas Belge ...)

Idem ici (croissement Sans Souci) : https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1464092542040171 rien n'indique un début de zone de rencontre ou une fin ...

J'ai pas vérifié (filmé) le début venant de Malibran mais j'ai rien remarqué ce matin en passant par là. Je re-vérifierai la semaine prochaine, mais en attendant il serait opportun de répondre à nos intérogations afin que la carte reflète la réalité.

D'avance merci
Raphael
Taya_S (2026-01-22 17:10:46+00:00): Reverted vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177573424
QuiLe (2026-01-23 02:34:40+00:00): Hello JShimasam and thanks for your contributions to OSM! I noticed you've been adding parking lots but a lot of these lots have had irregular or non-square bounds, this can look weird with overlapping ways or non-square polygons. Could you try to square your ways. (TIP: You can press Q on a way to square it).
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177569680
simon_geovelo (2026-02-10 08:42:02+00:00): Bonjour,
vous avez créer des pistes cyclavble en les nommant "bandes cyclables". Cela ne semble pas cohérent. De plus le tag name dois contenir le nom officiel de la voie et non une description. Est ce des pistes ou des bandes cyclables ?
Cordialement
Simon
TinPetreković (2026-01-28 05:32:38+00:00): The node that was accidentally created has been removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177789587 since it served no real purpose.
simon_geovelo (2026-02-10 08:45:55+00:00): Bonjour,
Pourquoi avez vous transformer cette voie verte en piste cyclable alors que sur le terrain c'est une voie verte avec un panneau C115 ?
mavl (2026-01-23 13:38:59+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок добавляет лес с названием "Лес у реки". Этот лесной массив действительно имеет такое название? Где можно в этом убедиться?
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-03 14:55:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 185044755, 185044712, 185044792, 185043031, 185044858, 185044854, 185044726, 185044802, 185044684, 185044693, 185043064, 185044766, 185044834, 185044779, 185043050, 185044776, 185043074, 185043054, 185044732, 185043091, 185044704, 185044746, 185044715, 185043085, 185044894, 185044810, 185044795, 185044765, 185044862, 185043059, 185044750, 185044758, 185043076, 185044812, 185044785, 185043015, 185043039, 185044823, 185044748, 185044738, 185044744, 185044734, 185044845, 185044702, 185044835, 185044888, 185044873, 185044731, 185044879, 185044817, 185044827, 185044789, 185044865, 185044720, 185044843, 185043045, 185044839, 185044849, 185044771, 185044694, 185044768, 185044707, 185043066 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed and buggy imports in Ivory Coast
neuhausr (2026-04-07 14:50:06+00:00): Hi, I think this changeset may have created a bunch of name:full and name:prefix keys that have no value? See OSM Inspector https://tinyurl.com/stcn9pxf
woodpeck (2026-05-20 11:28:47+00:00): Oops... didn't notice that. Fixing it now.
t_ja (2026-01-22 19:41:24+00:00): Ahoj,
len drobna poznamka: spravne je "by appointment", je to spomenute aj na OSM wiki.

T.
yzal (2026-01-24 13:26:15+00:00): Vďaka za info. Viem že "on appointment" som videl ako dohodnuté na fóre slovenskej OSM komunity. Bolo to toto vlákno https://groups.google.com/g/osm_sk/c/4f0m45WZzi0/m/tHgcLKl7AgAJ ešte z roku 2017 a od vtedy to tak zapisujem. Budem si na to musieť dať pozor.
t_ja (2026-01-24 16:35:21+00:00): Ze sa to diskutovalo na osm_sk som bud zabudol, alebo to uniklo mojej pozornosti. Zaujimave je, ze uz v tom case bolo na wiki uvedene "by appointment": https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Key:opening_hours&oldid=1481727

Kazdopadne je to len detail, nema to viditelny vplyv na zobrazovanu mapu.
bxl-forever (2026-01-22 16:09:48+00:00): Zone de rencontre en maintenant le 30 km/h n’est pas possible. Corrigez votre édition svp.
bxl-forever (2026-01-23 13:50:09+00:00): Nous avons corrigé votre édition.
bxl-forever (2026-01-22 16:15:36+00:00): Hello,
I understand what you wanted to do here.  However, there were a few problems with the way you modified the map.  Please do not write multiple address values on building outlines.
If there are several house numbers inside the same building, addresses must be written as single nodes.
Also, please do not trace buildings from distorted aerial imagery, only vector imagery should be used.
I fixed this edit, no further action is required here. Thanks.
Glassman (2026-02-24 03:08:40+00:00): Instead of deleting then adding the buildings back, it is better to just update the existing outline. Doing so will keep the history intact.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177571644
Udarian (2026-01-22 23:50:27+00:00): next time please add a better changeset comment, for this changeset a comment of "added an electronics repair shop" would be sufficient, for more info see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Happy Mapping,
Udar.