piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
pantufla (2023-08-29 09:08:55+00:00): Muchísimas gracias por la respuesta, y sobre todo por la dedicación al país. Sin duda que OSM puede ser una buena base, sin embargo estaría bien definir los criterios antes para que armonice con todo lo que se usa los mapas. Por un lado, los árboles deberían tener todos los datos, pero no usar la etiqueta name=*, salvo contadas excepciones. Por otro lado, estas zonas parecen ser más de administración interna del parque, no soy de dominio público, no? Si te parece hablamos por Telegram que veo que estás en el grupo :)
La Bióloga Lu (2023-08-29 20:21:13+00:00): Finalmente entendí el tema de los nombres de los árboles a los que te refieres. Revisé de nuevo la guía de mapeo de árboles y no recordaba esa regla sobre la etiqueta name=*, además me fijé bien como lo está haciendo Paul Dassori quien es mi referente en el mapeo del arbolado urbano. Ya voy a acomodar todos esas etiquetas. El tema de las Zonas del Parque lo podemos conversar por el Telegram. Muchas gracias por las observaciones y la paciencia.
pantufla (2023-09-04 10:14:20+00:00): Qué bueno, me alegro. Muchas gracias a ti por la comprensión. Poco a poco entre todos nos podemos ir entendiendo :)
Druzzy (2023-09-06 10:56:39+00:00): Ho visto che i due tronconi della strada sono statai riuniti, dopo che tempo fa li avevo staccati. Il punto è questo: le immagini aeree che fornisce OSM mostrano un pezzo di strada e un ponte che dall'agosto 2020 non esistono più, all'inizio per l'alluvione che ha colpito quel punto della valle, visibile anche dalle immagini di Google Earth, ora perchè sono state costruite delle opere gigantesche per contenere il torrente. Quindi lì la strada e il ponte non ci sono più e non credo li rifaranno (per come hanno fatto la riva da lì non passerà nulle, credo). Sono stato lì di persona anche a inizio settembre 2023. In compenso hanno fatto una strada che porta al ponte più in basso, ma ora risulta inerbata e interrotta (caduto ponte di tiubi provvisorio), dopo l'ennesimo nubifragio di fine luglio '23. La zona è cantiere, anche se i lavori sono fermi quantomeno da Pasqua '23, quindi sarà sistemata definitivamente in futuro (credo). Allo stato attuale però la mappa con la strada che congiunge le due rive del torrente è sbagliata e fuorviante.
Se si vuole provo a modificarla ad occhio togliendo la parte di strada che verosimilmente manca, in attesa della sistemazione definitiva della zona da parte del comune.
sheldonelectric (2025-02-01 21:33:46+00:00): Καλώς ήλθες στο openstreetmap Αλέξανδρε, τα ελληνικά μπαίνουν ως name και τα λατινικά ως int_name
Dodko (2023-08-10 18:01:46+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11102638373
12:15-13:00 is closed?

use 
Mo-Fr 08:00-12:15,13:00-16:30; Sa 08:00-12:00

https://projets.pavie.info/yohours/
Glassman (2023-08-11 17:18:58+00:00): Are you sure this is a hostel? The website indicates it is a apartment complex. Can you review this edit and correct as needed. Let me know if you need help.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139718009
gurglypipe (2023-08-11 08:54:52+00:00): Hi, do you have any answers to the questions which people previously asked of you on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138109479, about this path?

The path may well have been blocked using non-intrusive methods such as piles of stones. Signs are not normally how National Trust discourage people from using paths on rocky upland areas. Were there any indications of this?
AVFC (2023-08-11 14:38:32+00:00): No, it was just the same as last time I visited. No piles of stones over the marked path at all.  Go check it out yourself.
user_14063915 (2023-08-10 22:26:01+00:00): die 101 steht doch in Waldbüttelbrunn
user_14063915 (2023-08-10 22:26:41+00:00): https://www.dhl.de/de/privatkunden/dhl-standorte-finden.html?address=97299&locationType=packstationen
user_5359 (2023-08-11 04:32:47+00:00): Tut mir leid, Cookies für Google-Karten gebe ich nicht mehr frei. Aber ich habe ein Foto mit der Referenznummer vorliegen, auf der die Nummer und die Postleitzahl deutlich lesbar sind.
user_14063915 (2023-08-11 13:13:46+00:00): es geht doch nicht um cookies, 1. ist hier eine Bing Karte in der Webseite eingebaut und 2tes ging es um die Auflistung, da diese noch nicht nutzbar ist wie es aussieht. Aber Hauptsache mal wieder meckern mit Fake Infos. Weiter machen, typisch dieser user.
user_5359 (2023-08-11 16:22:53+00:00): Ich habe es nochmal kontrolliert: Ich habe tatsächlich fälschlicherweise zu schnell den Standard vorausgesetzt. Entschuldige bitte den Fauxpas. Hoffentlich kommt dein Blutdruck bald wieder in normale Grenzen. Und doch, es geht  zumindest mir um Cookies. Bitte berücksichtige vor deinen nächsten Kommentar, dass die Post auch eine Laufzeit zum Eintragen in Ihren Datenbestand einer frisch aufgestellten Paketbox benötigt. Ein entsprechender Tag mit den Schlüssel note ist ergänzt worden.  Ich kann dir gerne das angesprochene Foto zukommen lassen, dass das eingetragene Objekt existiert. Danke übrigens für die freundliche Erlaubnis, weiter mit OSM zu arbeiten.
user_14063915 (2023-08-11 16:51:31+00:00): Mal absteigen von hohen Ross und mit ihrer Art und Weise aufpassen.
Nase wohl zu hoch ib die Luft gestreckt oder wie? 

Ne danke, Brauch keinen Beweis bin vorhin selbst vorbei gejoggt.
user_14063915 (2023-08-11 16:52:31+00:00): Und dann vielleicht auch alles Tags dafür ergänzen aber warum sollte man den ordentlich was erfassen. 
Die Maße zählt, nichts anders.
Map-Peter (2023-08-10 21:33:29+00:00): Hallo Mapsinator,
 
bist du dir da wirklich sicher?
 
Denn ich kenne holzheizer (siehe Version #1: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/601505394/history ) schon lange und kann mir nicht vorstellen das er dies versehentlich so getaggt hat.  
Es gibt ja recht oft die Kombination aus Cafe und Bäcker - nicht immer ist beides vor Ort sofort offensichtlich.
 
Oder gibt es mittlerweile einen neuen Betreiber, der vielleicht nur den Namen übernommen hat?
 
Gruß Peter
Mapsinator (2023-08-11 19:28:21+00:00): Hallo Peter,

wenn die Eigenschaft shop = bakery zeigt, dass in dem Café Kuchen verkauft wird, dann füge ich sie wieder hinzu.

MfG
Mapsinator (2023-08-11 19:39:16+00:00): PS: 
Nach genauerem Überlegen sind die Backwaren wahrscheinlich selbst gebacken. Ja, es ist bestimmt eine Kombination aus Café und Bäckerei.

Vielen Dank für den Hinweis.
eggie (2023-08-10 19:19:00+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Fizzie-DWG (2023-12-19 14:04:31+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145293419
jaap de vries (2023-08-14 11:58:19+00:00): Je geeft aan dat hier weides zijn maar dan is onjuist. In Nederland geven wij dat aan als grass, zie ook de geschiedenis set. Graag opletten als je in Nederland gaat mappen!
jaap de vries (2023-08-14 11:59:56+00:00): Graag ipv Bing de actuele PDOK kaart gebruiken voor Nederland.
marczoutendijk (2023-11-13 14:18:35+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1196881388
bridge=1?
What is the meaning of that?
Josuer (2023-11-13 15:08:21+00:00): It is an error, should be bridge=yes and layer=1
DP24PH (2023-08-11 01:04:15+00:00): Hi! Thank you very much for placing missing street names. However, you need to add the "Street" suffix right after the name of the street for clarificatory purposes. Hope this helps you a lot to improve on your mapping journey.


DP24 (via OSMCha)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139720809
CurlingMan13 (2023-11-01 12:25:58+00:00): Please use more detailed changeset comments.  What did you change, and why?
vtrtsxlegend (2024-01-04 13:54:15+00:00): Hi Jeti87,  I am reaching out to you as you have done some edits on these junctions and value your input. According to our real time sources and some local knowledge Neefestraße  at around this junction with A72 is now open in both directions and that off ramp  way 52492159 is also open to traffic.  We also see that the off/on ramps of ways: 3237226, 301694817 are closed to traffic at this time.  I would like to make the edits to facilitate these updates do you have any issues with these being made?  Thank you.
Jeti87 (2024-01-04 14:28:08+00:00): Hi vtrtsxlegend,

I've changed it to the current situation, I know. If you have different knowledge, please do the changes.
vtrtsxlegend (2024-01-04 21:25:16+00:00): Hi Jeti87, based on our almost real time GPS tracks and local knowledge it does point to the changes I suggest in my earlier message.  However,  I propose for the next few days to leave the roadworks and layout as you have digitized them as it is possible that there will be more activity on the roadworks after the Christmas break.  So we will check again later next week. 
he roadworks in this vicinity are scheduled to continue through until 25th August 2024 so I am sure there will be some further changes required as the roadworks progress.
DP24PH (2023-08-11 01:07:16+00:00): Hi! Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thank you for supplying information to condo building (i.e. name). However, upon review, building:levels=* should be the actual number and not 0 (zero/nada). Kindly fix this as soon as you have received this feedback.


DP24 (via OSMCha)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139721992
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2023-08-31 20:33:34+00:00): مرحبا بك في خريطة الشارع المفتوحة ونرجوا منكم عدم إدخال أماكن عشوائية إليها
Dimitar155 (2024-01-24 19:22:17+00:00): Привет!

Не е нужно името на сградата да дублира адреса, който вече е отбелязан.

Поздрави,
Митко
5m4u9 (2023-08-11 04:42:58+00:00): Hi, officially ref "D4143" only applies from the bridge to the rural area (to east).
Corban8 (2023-08-11 12:48:09+00:00): Thank you for letting me know. It just seemed odd at the time to stop a ref without connecting to the rest of the network.I will make the correction.
streckenkundler (2023-08-10 20:27:17+00:00): ...mich würde mal interessieren, wo man bei "Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta" den Hofnamen erkennen kann...
silversurfer83 (2023-08-11 07:38:07+00:00): Die Frage habe ich auch schon gestellt...
Bitte dringend um Antwort für deine Namensquellen.

Ein hoffentlich hilfreicher Hinweis:
In Hessen und NRW gibt es Luftbilder der Länder in guter und aktueller Qualität sowie auch die Katasterkarten. Die sind alle SEHR genau ausgerichtet und wesentlich besser fürs Armchair Mapping geeignet.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139722764
silversurfer83 (2023-08-11 07:39:31+00:00): Wie kommst du hier auf die abenteuerliche Geometrie des farmyards?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139722840
lberges (2023-08-11 10:33:39+00:00): 1. aus des Luftbild (Hütte rechts und Holzlager)
2. Boris-NRW zeigt ein ungleichmäßiges Dreieck
3. man kann sicher ein Polygon mit mehr Ecken machen
rskedgell (2025-02-08 07:01:55+00:00): I can't see any signage suggesting that  these streets should be tagged as highway=living_street, which in the UK would be a TSRGD diagram 881 Home Zone sign (like this one https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Home_zone_Higham_on_the_Hill_Nuneaton_Dec_2019.jpg ).

I think this is likely to be a problem with how StreetComplete interpreted your response to the AddMaxSpeed quest, rather than something you did. I'll restore the streets to highway=residential.
jmarchon (2023-08-12 10:06:39+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Nice work!
Loop120 (2023-08-10 21:52:45+00:00): It seems unusual to mark the nodes at the intersection of driveways and footpaths as "crossings". The footpath is not crossing any street.
bxl-forever (2023-08-11 15:53:53+00:00): "crossing=unmarked" would already be some improvement for such situations.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:crossing%3Dunmarked#Tricky_cases
Supaplex030 (2023-08-31 12:35:22+00:00): I reverted this CS – highway=crossing should not be used on driveways crossing footways.
amir ghobbeh (2023-08-10 20:47:20+00:00): please upload my location
MxxCon (2023-08-12 04:11:25+00:00): Hello.
When mapping curbs and especially curb cuts, they shouldn't be glued to the sidewalks. They should be positioned exactly where they are and additional sidewalk segments drawn to connect them.
If you glue curbs to the middle of sidewalk that means that there's a curb in the middle of the sidewalk...obviously not correct. Routing/navigation software that accounts for wheelchairs or bikes or people with low vision will have inaccurate information and could potentially reroute them far away because of such a mistake..
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139723697
jmarchon (2023-08-12 10:08:20+00:00): Hello there and welcome to OSM! Nice work!
ginjaneer (2023-08-12 15:30:31+00:00): Hey there! Thanks!
citrula (2023-09-10 13:38:49+00:00): Hi, please use the full expanded form for street names and do not use abbreviations.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139724141
MxxCon (2023-08-12 04:15:28+00:00): It probably shouldn't be =private but instead =customers or =permit.
Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access for detailed explanation of this tag.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139724801
valaise (2023-08-12 21:53:59+00:00): I previously read through through the documentation and considered both of these options.

The =permit tag does not apply here as it's defined by a permit that is "routinely granted to everyone requesting it", and there was no indication that access was allowed for anyone other than people affiliated with the college.

In the documentation there doesn't appear to be any indication of =customers being used for college campuses, and it's centered around whether or not a person is willing to pay. The description also mentions that membership clubs are generally tagged as =private.

In both cases the most applicable tag appears to be =private. What other information would you suggest checking to determine the correct tag for this area?

Could you share where there may be discussion or consensus somewhere on how to apply these tags for college campuses of this type?
CurlingMan13 (2023-08-11 01:39:36+00:00): 'This changeset has been reverted in part or full.  It is still visible on aerial imagery.  Access tags should be used instead, such as "access=private".

You can read more about why it shouldn'"'"'t be removed here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property'

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139728787
gscholz (2023-11-13 13:41:56+00:00): Hallo auvida,
die Strecke sollte wohl besser als Relation eingetragen werden, da sie sich selbst und andere Pisten überlagert und überschneidet:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=8.54690&lat=47.73875&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Guido
auvida (2023-11-14 22:08:50+00:00): Hallo Guido,
Vielen Dank für deinen Input. Momentan habe ich leider keine Zeit es zu ändern. Sobald ich Zeit finde, werde ich es versuchen. Falls es dir möglich ist, kannst du es gerne anpassen.
Gruss Dani
ovruni (2023-08-11 00:08:39+00:00): Hola Aokin1999, al ver desde la imagen de Mapbox indicada se ven zonas con casas y carreteras, además de otras áreas que intersectan con una zona de pedregal agregada por otro usuario previamente. ¿Cuales son las fuentes para las asear de brezal?
Saludos
felipeeugenio (2023-08-10 22:57:39+00:00): HOla
Con la letra Q puedes hacer que las casas queden con ángulos rectos.
Estas casas estásn todas descuadradas. saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139726382
HenriSaucisse (2023-08-10 23:04:41+00:00): Hola! gracias por el tip, corregido
jb54osm (2023-08-11 11:11:10+00:00): I changed URL to Website, and from preuninger to tesla-den haag.
JackNUMBER (2023-08-11 16:08:30+00:00): Nice catch, thank you!
vasony (2023-08-30 18:25:48+00:00): Szia!

Volt valami oka, hogy a Deák Ferenc tér 14 házszámot letörölted az épületről?

Tamás
KasperSFranz (2023-11-19 11:37:57+00:00): Hi,
You added both not:operator:wikidata=Q638098 and operator:wikidata=Q638098

I am guessing the not:operator is wrong so I have removed it.
literan (2023-08-12 13:45:11+00:00): а пересечения с дорогами почему не сделали? не забывайте, иначе роутер не увидит, что они пересекаются
mariotomo (2023-08-14 08:16:58+00:00): hi. nice addition, thank you. to increase the usefulness of such contributions, it's helpful if you would record a GPS trace of the walk you had to do, to reach the waterfall, or the name of the place. do you think you could still provide that?
mariotomo (2023-08-14 08:18:57+00:00): oh, I see it, "Chorro La Poma". that's the waterfall, or the stream? the path leading to it, it's not a straight line, or is it?
KathrinSt (2023-08-14 23:01:06+00:00): Hi, so the path I recorded is the walk from the main street/bus station on a winding dirt road to a place behind a crop field from where you need to descend down to the waterfall which is called "Chorro La Poma". The descend is not long, like 30m steep downhill, but I missed to record it. But the important thing is to find this access to go down, which is where I put the mark, because there is no sign. 
Hope this helps!
mariotomo (2023-08-15 06:21:59+00:00): hi, thanks, situation is quite clearer now. question: the node is *not* the waterfall, but the access point to it. is there a gate? or just a side track that one easily misses?
mariotomo (2023-08-15 06:29:26+00:00): I added a path I could read from aerial photography. maybe you can "fill in the blanks"? just visit https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1198205599, login with your account, and hit Edit.
thanks a lot!
KathrinSt (2023-08-15 14:17:24+00:00): Hey, it is strange because the path I recorded looks a little different. Is my path not visible, just the bus stop and the node that I marked? 
I think I copied the link to my recorded path:
http://ge0.me/wkLUJoUKgc

To your question, the node is an access point to walk down. It's not a gate, it's a little pathway that begins behind a crop field, so yes it is easily missed because nothing tells you to leave the "bigger" dirt road to cross the crop field. The pathway downhill is steep so the location of the waterfall must be almost the same on the map.
mariotomo (2023-08-15 16:13:19+00:00): I don't manage to see the path you recorded. do you think you could upload it to osm itself? like at https://www.openstreetmap.org/traces/new

remember to put it as identifiable:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Visibility_of_GPS_traces
seb0000 (2023-08-11 17:41:50+00:00): Whoops, way=footway wird nur 6x in ganz OSM verwendet... Das kann nicht richtig sein :D Hab den auch noch nebenan entfernt
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-08-11 00:48:43+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 123488010, 123493694, 123493723, 123493759, 123493781, 123493810, 123493852, 123493880, 123493905, 123493924, 123493961, 123493987, 123494037, 123494045, 123494061, 123494079, 123494095, 123494114, 123494121, 123494149, 123494153, 123494219, 123494239, 123494266, 123494283, 123494314, 123494328, 123494356, 123494363, 123494370, 123494376, 123494386, 123494400, 123494410, 123494418, 123494423, 123494435, 123494443, 123522524, 123522557, 123522611, 123522661, 123522696, 123522756, 123522801, 123522864, 123522901, 123522923, 123522970, 123523034, 123523271, 123523341, 123523388, 123523441, 123523459, 123523517, 123523544, 123523602, 123523659, 123523729, 123523830, 123523891, 123523922, 123524076, 123524198, 123524244, 123524325, 123524512, 123524662, 123524697, 123524740, 123524792, 123524911, 123524971, 123525009, 123525132, 123525169, 123525243, 123525339, 123525386, 123525447, 123525489, 123525510, 123525546, 123525771, 123525865, 123525971, 123526281, 123526337, 123526471, 123526513, 123526526, 123526553, 123526578, 123526607.
mariotomo (2023-08-11 04:21:25+00:00): in my opinion, a bad edit. post office and supermarket "created" here were already in the database, and you deleted them, to create them again. this disrupts history.
BigKev97 (2024-02-08 17:19:05+00:00): My bad. It happens all the time.
Frans S (2023-08-14 10:26:42+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this task.
* Tagging of buildings. For HOTOSM projects, the standard tagging is 'building=yes' No text adding.  Please keep that in mind at further mappings.
Best regards
NorthCrab_upload (2023-08-11 01:20:20+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Komandora Tadeusza Bramińskiego":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11106087412
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11106087413
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11106087414
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11106087415
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11106087416
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11106087417
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11106087418
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11106087419
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11106087420
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11106087421
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11106087422
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11106087423
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11106087424

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
czebureks (2023-08-11 21:50:40+00:00): Skorygowano adresy.
archpdx (2023-08-12 20:15:39+00:00): Please make sure to review suggestions from the validator before "fixing" them. This changeset added several crossings, fords, and bridges that do not exist, for example:
* https://osm.org/node/739005403
* https://osm.org/node/11106095206
* https://osm.org/node/11106095205
* https://osm.org/node/11106095209
* https://osm.org/node/11106095210
* https://osm.org/way/1196927281
James Harms (2023-08-13 05:04:14+00:00): Okay, I will do that from now on. Thanks for telling me!
James Harms (2023-08-13 05:11:06+00:00): These have been removed by changeset 139808955
CurlingMan13 (2023-08-11 01:48:55+00:00): Resolved lollipoping and overlapping areas.  Mapper was referred to DWG for continued lollipops and partial overlaps, despite multiple comments.
chris66 (2023-11-22 19:36:32+00:00): HI!
Negative Gradzahl ist eigentlich nicht erlaubt. Statt -70 also besser 290 eintragen.

Siehe:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Adirection
jomox (2023-11-29 14:40:34+00:00): Danke, du hast Recht. Ich kümmer mich demnächst drum.
MxxCon (2023-08-12 04:22:42+00:00): Similar to your other edit, shouldn't this be =customers or =permit?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139729377
valaise (2023-08-12 21:55:58+00:00): I added a response to the other edit clarifying the decision.
phoenixsaigon1698 (2023-10-12 07:06:35+00:00): Việt ơi, relation 16122632 là cấm oto rẽ từ Thanh Lãm ra Phố Xốm nhỉ?
CurlingMan13 (2023-08-11 17:05:13+00:00): Land areas should not partially overlap, as has been mentioned before.  Specifically, you just re-partially overlapped https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/965083344 with the tee-box.

I have yet again, gone ahead and cleaned up the partial overlaps.

This is yet again, another changeset where you have incorrectly partially overlapped features.  I have mentioned this before in many changesets.
user_5359 (2023-08-11 06:29:31+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I remove your SEO SPAM entry (most foreign keys)
Hb- (2023-08-13 10:20:24+00:00): Please set building=construction for the destroyed buildings.