piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
McKulkin (2026-05-24 00:50:39+00:00): Dear community, please help me with what I've done to node/10873851305 . I believe it's labeled correctly, but neither the OSM renderer, nor mapy.com, nor OsmAnd seem to display it.
As this is an important landmark on quite a popular trail that helps navigating quite a demanding track in difficult weather conditions, I'd like to bring it out of the shadows, even if that means abandoning my purist/pedantic OSM attitude. Here's how this "thing" looks like https://d34-a.sdn.cz/d_34/c_img_gU_4/JVlUJD.jpeg
I'm unsure whether tagging with  `landmark=yes` would help. Shall I change it to a "building"?  What do you think?
McKulkin (2026-05-24 01:00:40+00:00): *change it back to "shelter" from "building"
yelisey90 (2026-06-08 17:57:15+00:00): So is the roof collapsed or not? Can it be used as shelter or not? If not, it shouldn't be used as such. If it can be, then well, go ahead.
Tagging it as building is, of course, incorrect; moreover, it won't help you as buildings mapped as nodes are ignored by the majority of renderers.
I can only suggest historic=vehicle. Because Soviet already means pretty much historic...
McKulkin (2026-06-24 16:00:25+00:00): `historic=vehicle` is exactly what I was looking for. Could not have been a better suggestion! Thanks.
astro_furball (2026-04-05 16:55:11+00:00): Wiki guidance: "Objects without clear evidence that there is some real active plan to construct it should be removed from data."

Note that the proposal never seems to have actually passed parliament, and further hadn't even narrowed down the proposed route options down to a single preferred route. So it doesn't appear to have ever met the "some real active plan to construct it" standard.
osmviborg (2026-04-05 17:18:32+00:00): 👌
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 08:59:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
Guinevere23 (2026-05-02 07:59:12+00:00): This construction has not yet been approved so shouldn't show as a construction area at this point
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:00:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-05-04 17:49:33+00:00): https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/bledne-numery-drog-w-dolnoslaskim/91126/37
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-05-04 19:03:02+00:00): czy była z twojej strony jakakolwiek próba weryfikacji czy oznakowanie jest zmienione w terenie?
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-05-29 10:56:16+00:00): z powodu braku odpowiedzi planuję wycofanie tej edycji lub podobne działania
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:02:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
kingkingHK (2026-04-06 03:11:27+00:00): You glued the road to the bridge.
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:11:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
eggie (2026-04-05 18:22:11+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
SpicyNodes (2026-04-05 18:24:39+00:00): Dank u!
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:00:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:11:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
NeisBot (2026-04-05 17:48:46+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13708930667 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Geodetic office"
---
Na przykład, bardziej neutralna i fakticzna wersja Twojego tekstu mogłaby brzmieć: "Biuro geodezyjne"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-13 22:33:05+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181297480
(Restore previous tags. Too much spam)
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:02:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
assanges (2026-04-05 19:31:01+00:00): 641 acutally
mcliquid (2026-04-05 18:00:51+00:00): Sorry, Changeset Comment:
Added building for the bank and fixed some mis-aligned buildings.
Source: Esri
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:12:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
sim6 (2026-04-05 18:41:10+00:00): The track https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/613327732 is transitable with vehicle with some high clearance without a heavy offroad vehicle except for the point marked by the note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5231947.
Hugoren Martinako (2026-04-05 18:49:49+00:00): Ok, changed to path. Easier to map, easier to keep
sim6 (2026-04-05 22:00:34+00:00): Follow-up: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180911769
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 08:59:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
NeisBot (2026-04-05 18:26:30+00:00): 🌍 Üdvözöljük az OSM-en, mszrsljszslt.
Köszönjük a közreműködésed!

Hogy megkönnyítsük az együttműködést és segítsünk másoknak megérteni a szerkesztéseidet, a legjobb, ha rövid leírást adsz hozzá a változtatásaidhoz. Az érthető megjegyzések segítik a közösséget abban, hogy kövessék a munkádat és jobb visszajelzést adjanak. Tippeket találhatsz a jó megjegyzések írásáról itt[1].

✅ Íme egy minta megjegyzés a térképszerkesztéseid alapján: "Vízi elem hozzáadása, beleértve egy tavat"
(Auto-translation)
---
🌍 Welcome to OSM, mszrsljszslt.
Thanks for contributing!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

✅ Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added water feature, including a pond"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:11:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:10:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
flohoff (2026-04-08 07:16:22+00:00): Moin,
ich habe hier deine änderungen mit den Milestones gesehen und ich glaube nicht das das so richtig ist.

Die Milestones sollen da eingezeichnet werden wo sie stehen. Aber die stehen ja nicht mitten auf der Fahrbahn oder?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmilestone

D.h. die müssten eigentlich hinter die Leitplanke oder?


Flo
streetuser (2026-04-08 17:41:31+00:00): Kommt drauf an, welchen Wiki Eintrag man huldigen möchte.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dmilestone
Wildsharky (2026-04-07 03:51:52+00:00):  Reverted in changeset id:180936449
sim6 (2026-04-05 21:37:29+00:00): This way is 3m wide and a normal offroad vehicle can reach the viewpoint, except for the point marked with https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5231947. At this point, a regular 4x4 vehicle only can pass bridging with recovery boards.
woodpeck_repair (2026-04-13 23:31:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 181298385 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20132
SomeoneElse (2026-05-22 12:52:27+00:00): Hello,
I've moved the Hertfordshire Way and the other signed paths over to the parallel riverside paths in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183021991 - does that make sense to you?
Best Regards,
Andy
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:11:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
ColbyTheWorldTraveler (2026-04-06 19:42:20+00:00): I myself would leave the playground unnamed unless it explicitly has that name. You can also square your shapes by hitting the 'Q' key. Otherwise, looks good! Welcome to the mapping community!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180912724
silversurfer83 (2026-04-06 09:02:18+00:00): Hi there :)

please use better changeset comments. I already linked the wiki page explaining that and asked you twice. "update" is no good comment.

Thank you and happy mapping

(remember to sqaure buildings with "Q" and don't add non-permanent camper vans or tents as buildings)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180912896
NeisBot (2026-04-05 19:30:39+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 11 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/554125643 v16 | 11 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/12176757429 v7
https://osm.org/node/845199396 v15

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180912967
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:09:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
MassCartog (2026-04-07 00:27:54+00:00): Hello, so how access works is you can set the tag "foot=yes" and the rest as no, but if its public leave "access=*" set to yes. 

Setting it "access=no" and "foot=yes" means its a foot path but NOT for public access. I dont think thats what you ment to do.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
Ba5eba11nut (2026-04-07 01:22:57+00:00): Understood. Thanks!
Kovoschiz (2026-04-06 09:27:37+00:00): `junction:ref=` is not necessary on single number / `=motorway_link`
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:01:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:11:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
dmjab13 (2026-04-06 15:24:49+00:00): please try to refrain from submitting changesets that span this wide
dsk1 (2026-04-08 15:15:36+00:00): Unfortunately this happens when an upload fails without my knowledge and I add new edits afterwards. If anyone knows how to split such edits I'll do that if it happens again.
NeisBot (2026-04-05 20:30:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13709476944 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Roofing company"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisAgent (2026-04-05 22:33:24+00:00): 🕵 The changeset tags appear to reference Google as a data source.

Please note that using Google Maps, Google Street View, or similar Google services as a mapping source is not allowed in OpenStreetMap due to license restrictions.

More information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google

If the data in this changeset was derived from Google or another incompatible source, the edits may need to be reverted.

If this is a misunderstanding and the data was collected from permitted sources (e.g. local survey, Bing imagery, local knowledge, etc.), please clarify in a reply.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-17 01:52:27+00:00): I WOULD LIKE YOU TO STOP SPAMMING.

Reverted adding SEO spam POI with advertising/malformed tags and explicit source=* of Google Maps, which is not allowed by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ), in changeset 184205280

https://osm.org/changeset/184205280
MarcoR (2026-05-07 10:22:01+00:00): This changeset created some duplicate POIs like Chocolat (node/13709588342 and node/13064907954) and "Caseificio Lupo" (node/13064942168 and node/13709583212)
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180914890
dmjab13 (2026-04-06 15:27:15+00:00): how is this changeset so wide
Norbert Dichter (2026-04-11 19:29:41+00:00): Hello, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. Thank you for your contribution. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. Or just hit the Q-key.
Also please keep in mind: many buildings are very close but do not actually touch each other, try to map them close to each other without letting them connect or share nodes with each other, roads, or residential area outlines. In the iD web editor, holding down the "alt" key will keep nodes from "snapping" to each other and accidentally connecting.  Thanks so much for your contribution, Norbert 'Nodi' Dichter, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180915056
Frans S (2026-04-12 13:06:25+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please use the default tagging used for HOTOSM.  tag just as building=yes. Nothing else, nothing more.
Local mappers can retag them accordingly to their function,
Best regards and keep mapping
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:00:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:09:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-06 06:54:39+00:00): Thanks @FvGordon

Danke für die Behebung der unabsichtlichen Node-Verschiebung von https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180864833
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-06 06:56:36+00:00): Danke auch für die Korrektur von https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180867618
maro21 (2026-04-06 18:57:28+00:00): Jakie jest źródło tej edycji?
AndyB_66 (2026-04-07 11:14:20+00:00): Budowa jeszcze się nie rozpoczęła - zmiany wycofuję.
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-06 07:23:19+00:00): Hi smith_machine, welcome to OSM.

I am not sure whether the shop should really be named "Vacant Shop".

What do you think?

Best regards
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:10:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
Piskvor (2026-04-07 08:49:18+00:00): Reverted. 

hgv: "heavy goods vehicles". Definitely not on this small boat: https://www.prazskebenatky.cz/cz/prazske-privozy/privoz-p1
intransan123 (2026-04-10 15:46:49+00:00): Hej, masz jakieś źródło danych dla tej edycji? Bo na ostatnich zdjęciach udostępnionych przez nadzór budowy z marca tego roku(https://www.s61-lomza-kolno.gddkia.gov.pl/galeria/) ta droga nie wygląda na ukończoną, zwłaszcza jeśli chodzi o rondo z DW 668(https://www.s61-lomza-kolno.gddkia.gov.pl/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/54.DK64-KM-6000-1.jpg). W mniej niż miesiąc wszystko dokończyli?
NeisBot (2026-04-05 21:18:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 15 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1496765045 v1 | 6 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1496765047 v1 | 3 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1496765044 v1 | 3 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180916238
eggie (2026-04-06 06:59:54+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback   De info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode en restaurant aangepast naar een locatie voor feesten en partijen. .
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Senihtu (2026-04-06 08:00:55+00:00): Guten Morgen!
Mit diesem Changeset hast du auch Way 576919719 sowie way 576919722 als service=parking_aisle getaggt.
Ich bin der Meinung, das diese Wege nur highway=service (ohne parking_aisle) sein sollten - denn dort kommt der Linienbus durch.
Im Wiki steht bei s=p_a "It is generally not used for through traffic."
frohe Ostern!
jengelh (2026-04-06 09:12:05+00:00): Tjoa. Aber der Bus ist ja in dem Moment kein Durchgangsverkehr, sondern hat ein Anliegen (Bedienung der Haltestelle). Stell dir nun auch vor, du bist LKW aus der Waschanlage. Willst du wirklich durch den Bushalteplatz navigiert werden nur weil dass — in Abwesenheit von parking_aisle — zufällig die günstigste Route ist?
Senihtu (2026-04-06 09:33:34+00:00): Deshalb habe ich Dich ja auch angeschrieben und es nicht gleich geändert :-) .
Wenn da eine Buslinie langgeht, dann ist das keine reine Stellplatzzufahrt und sollte nicht so eingetragen werden.
Wenn da der Lkw nicht lang soll (darf?) könnte man da auch was mit hgv machen.
auch PTNA (https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/DE/HE/DE-HE-NVV-Analysis.diff.html) meldet solche Stellen als verdächtig.
Aber wie gesagt: sollte, dürfte, könnte. Am Ende muß man sich die Stelle genau ansehen - und ich bin nicht vor Ort.
ticki_52 (2026-07-06 14:54:46+00:00): Hi jengelh, ich habe mir mal die Parkplatzsituation vor dem Eingang zum Hotel am Rüssel angeschaut. Dort haben die 3 U-förmigen Einbahnstraßen das tag "service=parking_aisle". Diese Eigenschaft entspricht in diesen Fällen nicht dem OSM-Wiki. Stellplätze an  "parking_aisles" können nur über den selben Weg verlassen werden, der bei der Zufahrt zum Stellplatz benutzt wurde ("out-through-in-door"). Aus diesem Grund können per definition parking_aisles keine Einbahnstraßen sein und im Umkehrschluss können Einbahnstraßen keine parking_aisles sein. Ich bin da auf der Linie von Senihtu. Wie siehst du das?
jengelh (2026-07-06 18:54:42+00:00): Junge, es stehen Einbahnstraßenschilder (Verkehrszeichen 220-10 und 267) an den jeweiligen Mündungspunkten.
Ein- und Ausparkvorgänge zählen nicht als entgegengesetzes Fahren im Sinne der Verkehrsregeln, auch wenn man physisch ggf. ein wenig rückwarts fahren muss. Einfach verdammt noch mal gesunden Menschenverstand nutzen.
trial (2026-07-08 17:18:18+00:00): > Aus diesem Grund können per definition parking_aisles keine Einbahnstraßen sein
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Dparking_aisle
"Add oneway=yes if cars can only travel in a single direction without going into reverse gear."
eggie (2026-04-06 07:01:38+00:00): Info samengevoegd. Probeer als het kan eerst de adresnode te selecteren en dan info bijtaggen.
MVG
eggie
MappingMore (2026-04-08 15:12:37+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:181055139
eggie (2026-04-06 07:03:11+00:00): Dag  barkeeper Nr 187 is niet hier.
Probeer op de adresnodes bij te taggen.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-04-06 07:06:28+00:00): Het adres heb ik verwijderd. Dat is niet hier. Ga na waar het bedrijf precies is svp.
Ook svp op de adresnode bijtaggen en de poi op het gebouw plaatsen. 
Mapse

MVG
eggie
MassCartog (2026-04-06 00:25:03+00:00): Hello, I was wondering why you changed all the access tags to "no" for all these trails? Seems like these are all trails at Rocky Hill Wildlife Sanctuary, and they are indeed open to the public. Thanks
Ba5eba11nut (2026-04-07 09:23:53+00:00): I guess I misunderstood  the wiki for "path=*" and I read it twice and felt that's what it needs to be.  Mass Audubon trails are for foot traffic only, and are free to use by members.  No bikes, horses, or motorized traffic allowed.
MassCartog (2026-04-07 23:26:18+00:00): Thanks for the reply. No worries, I fixed the ones I saw, Happy mapping!
stany1337 (2026-04-08 14:38:44+00:00): Aż dziwne, że ten oszołom maro jeszcze tego nie usunął.
Rick Richards (2026-04-06 08:32:43+00:00): Ahoj,
ďakujem za tvoju aktivitu v OpenStreetMap.

V tomto changesete si pridal cestu 2. triedy, ktorá však podľa dostupných podkladov vedie priamo cez budovu business centra. Takáto cesta sa tam v skutočnosti nenachádza, takže som túto úpravu vrátil, aby dáta zostali presné.

Ak s mapovaním ešte začínaš, pár tipov do budúcna:
- snaž sa overovať polohu ciest podľa viacerých zdrojov (ortofoto snímky, prípadne lokálna znalosť),
vyhýbaj sa kresleniu ciest cez budovy – tie by sa mali navzájom neprekrývať, pokiaľ to nie je skutočný prejazd (napr. pasáž a pod.),
pri väčších cestách (ako sú cesty 2. triedy) je dobré si byť istý, že naozaj existujú aj v teréne,
ak si nie si istý, pokojne sa spýtaj komunity alebo použi poznámky (notes) cez tlačidlo pridať poznámku.
literan (2026-04-06 19:10:56+00:00): revert