piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Igor Bubelov (2023-02-20 03:09:28+00:00): Yea, it's dead obvious for humans, but it's very hard to formalize for computers

Our apps show all places which are tagged as currency:XBT = yes, so every place with this tag is considered valid, and we recommend those places to local users and communities, and we encourage them to shop there and to maintain those places (by bumping check_date or survey_date from time to time)

We can alter the query and ask OSM for something like:

Give us all places with currency:XBT = yes AND disused:amenity not present

It will work for this particular place, but there are other disused places with other tags, so we'll need to list all the tags which can be disused, explicitly, so it would look like this:

currency:XBT = true and disused:amenity not present AND disused:shop not present AND disused:craft not present AND disused:tourism not present AND disused:leisure not present AND disused:office not present AND so on...

Relying on other tags to figure out if currency:XBT is really true gets a bit tricky, so adding lifecycle prefix to this tag alone simplifies things quite a bit =)

Regarding local areas, OSM discourages remote edits, and some local communities have their own conventions, so the locals are the ones who supposed to make final judgements on how to tag places located nearby them
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-20 01:23:01+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Wartość addr:city jest niezgodna z addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3366879715
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3366879717
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3366879746
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/528545757
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/528942162
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/528942165
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/528942465
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/528942470

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
kubahahaha (2023-02-20 01:28:31+00:00): Poprzednie wszystkie poprawiłem, tutaj to znowu za daleka odległość do place=*
NorthCrab (2023-02-20 04:06:03+00:00): Zwiększone z 3km do 10km
syntex (2024-03-08 13:43:36+00:00): Hej a dlaczego je skasowałeś? Jednak w warstwie ulic są nadane konkretne drogi, które mają w nazwie osiedle?
CurlingMan13 (2023-03-01 00:49:25+00:00): Do not add then delete features to the map just to export it to your little golf game.  You should perform the edits offline using JOSM, this way you do not damage other features on the map.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132770192
CurlingMan13 (2023-03-01 00:49:20+00:00): Do not add then delete features to the map just to export it to your little golf game.  You should perform the edits offline using JOSM, this way you do not damage other features on the map.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132770289
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-20 01:54:02+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Wartość addr:city jest niezgodna z addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3366879294
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3366879302
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3366879304
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/527128151
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/527128154
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/527133348

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
kubahahaha (2023-02-20 01:59:15+00:00): Młynne i Gorcowe też za daleko od place.
NorthCrab (2023-02-20 04:06:14+00:00): Zwiększone z 3km do 10km
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:12:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:11:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
Dimacn (2023-02-20 04:49:06+00:00): Пожалуйста не добавляйте дороги поверх уже существующих. Вы портите карту. Просто редактируйте существующие дороги.
Frank Peng (2023-04-06 22:12:23+00:00): Do not use the name tag to describe or label a feature. Just use the appropriate tags.
Frank Peng (2023-04-23 02:52:34+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_use_name_tag_to_describe_things
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:11:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
woodpeck (2023-02-21 12:46:07+00:00): In your changeset comment above you have added some marketing copy about the organisation you are promoting, but you have not explained why you have placed the office in the middle of the ocean next to the Philippines?
tyfi (2023-02-20 03:42:34+00:00): Specifically I meant the convenience store. The pumps are still Phillips 66.
MxxCon (2023-02-21 06:17:16+00:00): Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you convert this from building:part into just plain area? And what exactly do you mean by Stuytown Gyms? What kind of feature is this?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132771884
EvanSiroky (2023-02-28 22:04:51+00:00): Hey there! I'm a local mapper from Scotts Valley, California. I see that you requested a review of this changeset, so I'm giving it a review.

It looks like you seem to have already done a number of other edits in this area and changed the bike route relation. These edits all look mostly good, but the new roundabout created along Pondorado road could be improved such that it indicates one-way travel in the inner part of the roundabout and on the approaches too. 

If you're looking for another example of a good roundabout in the area, I'd recommend taking a look at this one near Roseville: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/38.76796/-121.27096

Otherwise, nice work adding this new information to OpenStreetMap!
DEMacIII (2023-04-07 00:08:15+00:00): Thank you.  There have been subsequent improvements and the area is looking great.
jmarchon (2023-02-20 06:04:38+00:00): Nice work!
Have you tried the app "StreetComplete" before? I highly recommend it.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/StreetComplete
GOwin (2023-02-22 00:48:37+00:00): Hi @Ian Tors. You appear to be adding spurious "community centres", which appear to have names that might be ref tags, and possibly a device or street cabinet for a telco?

Can you please elaborate, and perhaps we can help you map these things better in the future?

The pattern of the feature you're adding is very similar to @edwin_13. Are you associates?
Frans S (2023-02-20 12:50:36+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings not always accurate mapped.
Nearly all buildings are not squared !
Many buildings show an offset.




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132772485
Mahdi Nameghi (2023-02-20 06:52:14+00:00): کاربر گرامی 
شما اخیرا مشغول ویرایش هایی در نقشه هستید که باعث به وجود آمدن مشکلاتی در نقشه شده است. لطفا اگر به ویرایش نقشه آگاهی کافی ندارید دست به ویرایش نزنید. بی دلیل راهها رو دو لاینه نکنید.
okadatsuneo (2023-02-20 06:54:43+00:00): 初めまして。OSMにようこそ。
「雑種地」や「宅地」というのをnameに設定されていますが、そのような名称は不要ですので、削除をお願いします。
また宅地であれば、landuse=industrialではなく、landuse=residentialになります。
よろしくお願いします。
bxl-forever (2023-02-20 13:10:45+00:00): Hello,

I understand you are doing armchair mapping without knowing the local situation of countries you are changing.

We have said this several times to the owners of the numerous Bolt accounts who are editing here.  Please make sure to spread the word with other Bolt employees, we are growing tired of repeating the same information and having to clean up the same mistakes endlessly.

The country here is Belgium.  We have laws that stipulate that a one-way street can have an exemption for other modes of transport, sometimes for cyclists, sometimes for buses, or taxis, or light motorcycles…  Every street is different and the road signs at the entrance of every street are the ultimate reference for this.

Here is a recent picture from Mapillary.
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=548889413657423

The red sign is very clear to understand, it means no entry for cars.
There is an additional white sign underneath.  This says "except for bicycles".
In this street, cyclists may ride in both directions.
We add "oneway:bicycle=no" in such a case.

Adding oneway=yes without the expections would imply it is one-way for everyone, and it will prevent correct cycle routing in this area.
As a local community of mappers, we feel it is important to never forget those details.  We do not build a map just for cars, we build a map for everyone.

I fixed this one, you don’t have to do it.

Happy mapping.
Bolt058 (2023-02-21 08:41:29+00:00): Hello bxl-forever,

I apologize for the incorrect edits made, i haven't noticed the white board while adding oneways here. Thanks a lot for the correction and your valuable feedback.

Happy Mapping.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132774264
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-20 06:10:21+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o miejscowości.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/511069820

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/808484498
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/808484500
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/808484501
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/808484502
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/875862227
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/875862228
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/875862229

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Patryk2710 (2023-02-20 14:28:46+00:00): poprawione
map per (2023-02-22 10:43:27+00:00): Hallo kmorina,

and wilkommen bei OpenStreetMaps.

Das Pflegeheim (1) ist aktuell zwischen zwei Gebäuden eingezeichnet. Weißt du ob das im Almersweg 1 oder 3 liegt? Und weißt du e.v. noch den Namen vom Pflegeheim?

Danke und viele Grüße
map per

(1) https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10679905306
map per (2023-03-12 09:08:58+00:00): Ich gehe davon aus das dein Eintrag falsch war und hab das "Pflegeheim" gelöscht.

Viele Grüße
map per
ChillyDL (2023-02-20 18:28:01+00:00): Hello Aya Samir,
I see you changed all the roads I added yesterday into tracks. Could you let me know why? These are not minor land-access roads but serve as a connection in the general-purpose road network, which according to the Wiki makes them roads, not tracks. Some are even paved. From all I know and read in the Wiki, they should be tagged as  highway=unclassified.

Also, may I kindly ask you to use more specific edit summaries? "Modify some ways and tags" is about true for I suppose 95 % of all edits in OSM ... ;-)
Aya Samir (2023-02-21 08:11:50+00:00): Hello ChillyDL;
Thank you for reaching out, I changed some of them to the recent classification as a track like (way:366646945). and after  I made more investigations I totally agree with your suggestion and I reverted all the streets to the correct classifications as you mention.
Regards
Aya Samir
Cheng-Chi Feng (2023-02-20 07:03:28+00:00): 參考網址打錯，應為：https://mnya.tw/k3/word/1704.html
Frans S (2023-02-25 14:36:10+00:00): 
Hello. Thanks for mapping on this difficult task.
About mapping of tall apartment blocks

Mapping of tall buildings differs from standard buildings. Because the imagery is taken at an angle, you see both the rooflines and also the side of a building. 
How do you map such a building?
Map over the rooflines and lastly slide the mapped building to the footprint.
Please adjust wrong positioned buildings as well
This video shows how that is done.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1V5-bADsYiffCD9bo6l64YOdTvmKqMGry/view?usp=share_link

And.... don't forget to square each rectangular building.

Best regards and keep mapping
brust84 (2023-02-20 13:37:04+00:00): Hallo,

Da hier ein review request ist, hab ich mal kurz einen Blick auf das Changeset geworfen.  Wenn ich das richtig sehe, sollte laut Beschreibung ein Hydrant hinzugekommen sein, aber tatsächlich wurden nur Knoten in Wegen gelöscht/hinzugefügt.  Was war denn die Absicht hinter der Änderung?
FF Burgbernheim (2023-02-20 20:11:26+00:00): Wahrscheinlich versehentlich Eingabe
julcnx (2024-04-24 08:58:09+00:00): Hey, thank you for your contributions! I noticed you've marked some roads as 'living_street.' One tip for future edits: you should tag these as 'highway=residential' instead. This is because there aren't any rules in Thailand that specifically lower speed limits or give pedestrians priority in residential areas.
You can read more about this on the Thailand wiki. If you have any questions, feel free to ask. Cheers
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Thailand#Urban_and_Local_Road_wide_enough_for_motor_cars
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132776088
Supaplex (2023-02-20 08:29:08+00:00): 這應該不是公路的休息站吧？如果是個人休息紀錄，請善用app的書籤功能，請別上傳到OpenStreetMap 上面
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132776166
A67-A67 (2023-03-23 22:39:14+00:00): In this change name:xx tags (exonyms) for many languages where removed without motivation. I've restored these tags.
borovac (2023-03-24 07:21:15+00:00): Hi A67-A67, 
the removal was not done without motivation, it was requested by OSM DataWorkingGroup, I had to remove all these name variants since the source was Wikipedia, which is not by the rules. If you have knowledge for these name variants, please feel free to add them. 
Sincerely, borovac
mueschel (2023-02-21 11:21:09+00:00): Hi,
welcome to OSM!
In OSM we have to use a well-defined set of tags to allow all the software tools to understand the data and e.g. show it on maps.
Please make sure that you only use tags that are documented in the Wiki or are available as presets in your editor.

E.g. these tags are not used in any other place and should be replaced by a common and documented tag, e.g. 'species':

lichen 4
lichen-6
lichen_3
Lichen 2

And also note: 
- the species of a tree is not its 'name'. It should be tagged as 'species'.
- don't use natural=wood for single trees. These are natural=tree
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-03-21 20:19:05+00:00): Why are you making data worse by replacing correctly drawn buildings with squares?
burrscurr (2024-11-13 11:04:48+00:00): Hi Lukka_dd,

I noticed that you added bicycle=yes on Ligneralle. Normally, this should not be necessary -- unless explicitly forbidden, cyclists are allowed on roads like this (e.g bicycle=yes is implied). Did you have something specific in mind you wanted to tag here?

Cheers
burrscurr
ZeLonewolf (2023-03-12 12:35:04+00:00): Please don't edit boundaries in iD, it will not warn you of a mistake. This edit left a member way with a missing relation role.
jeslop (2023-02-20 10:15:42+00:00): Hola Manolo Román. ¿Hay algún motivo para eliminar estas escaleras y el camino?

Saludos

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
Manolo Román (2023-02-20 12:33:50+00:00): Al hacer pruebas me he dado cuenta de que se compartían mis cambios y he dejado de editar. Perdón por las molestias.
jeslop (2023-02-20 13:10:16+00:00): No pasa nada. Aquí hay una guía para comenzar: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Gu%C3%ADa_de_principiantes

Y también https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/

Saludos,

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
Manolo Román (2023-02-20 13:16:12+00:00): Ok, muchas gracias.
Frans S (2023-04-07 13:25:01+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
You added a number of times the layer=1 to a building. Why ? Is that building hanging in the air ?
Or is it to get rid of an error which says that the building is overlapping another?
In the latter, please adjust the building so it don't overlap.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132777810
Makanapp (2023-02-20 08:26:02+00:00): دست به مسیر نزن - به نفع نرم افزار نشان تمومش نکن
Makanapp (2023-02-20 08:27:07+00:00): مادرجنده ریدی تو مسیرها -
Tooga (2023-02-20 20:46:48+00:00): Dina ändringar är inte konstruktiva och har blivit återställda. Fortsatt redigering i den här stilen leder till att ditt konto blockeras.
OSM_RogerWilco (2023-03-30 20:06:18+00:00): Hallo Schramme,

verwende bitte highway=mini_roundabout nur echte Kreisverkehre (mit überfahrbarer Mittelinsel).

Siehe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dmini_roundabout

Viele Grüße
Roger Wilco
OSM_RogerWilco (2023-03-30 20:09:19+00:00): P.S.: Ist der Torfweg wirklich nur ein Weg und keine Straße?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1147843056
Schramme (2023-03-31 08:26:40+00:00): Hi, du hast natürlich recht mit dem mini_roundabout. Haste schon geändert hab ich gesehen. Danke. VG
Schramme (2023-03-31 08:27:31+00:00): Als ich dort vorbeitgefahren bin, waren das noch Wege. Sind Neubauten. Ich kann beim nächsten mal drauf achten, wie der aktulle Stand ist und updaten.
OSM_RogerWilco (2023-03-31 20:04:35+00:00): Wege können aber nicht von mehrspurigen Fahrzeugen befahren werden. Da frage ich mich, wie die dann die Häuser bauen. ;-)
user_5359 (2023-02-20 09:27:59+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Zu einem gehört die Firmenbezeichnung nicht an das Gebäude, da auch andere Firmen / Büros im Gebäude vorhanden sind (siehe blaue Punkte) und zu anderem wäre schön, wenn Du die Art der Firma (z.B. mit dem Schlüsselwort office (siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:office) kennzeichnet.
user_18526234 (2023-02-20 20:27:11+00:00): Hello LuSirto,
I seems that you have added or eddited some landuse=village_green. Please read:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse=village_green
Would a more specific tag like grass or shrubbery be more appropriate?
Please read:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landcover=greenery
For a list of alternative tags.

Greetings
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-02-20 19:47:46+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1132048440

IMO this micromapping looks overdone
goedegazelle (2023-02-20 16:50:05+00:00): Ik moet je erop wijzen dat
sidewalk=* strijdig is met foot=use_sidepath. Voetgangers kunnen niet tegelijkertijd zowel naar een stoep als naar een zijpad worden geleid.
gscholz (2023-02-23 08:37:40+00:00): Hi KamanaEsperance,
this changeset has created a lot of errors regarding self intersecting lines:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=34.25430&lat=1.23120&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=132779741

Obviously you have shifted the river without respecting the riverbed.

Can you please fix this?

You may also like to educate yourself about the internal validator of JOSM to avoid uploading such errors:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Validator

Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2023-02-27 11:18:27+00:00): Hi KamanaEsperance, 
this errors still exist, can I get your feedback here?
Guido
elsy1 (2023-02-20 08:54:59+00:00): جواب کامنت ندادی و هنوز اقدام به خرابکاری میکنید گزارش داده شد
Makanapp (2023-02-20 09:02:19+00:00): انگل ، داری مسیر ها رو خراب می کنی
Makanapp (2023-02-20 09:02:42+00:00): گزارش خودت و الباقی کاربرای نشان رو دادیم
خرابکارای انگل
Makanapp (2023-02-20 09:03:45+00:00): ما ویرایش های خودمون رو بارگزاری می کنیم - نشان از بین رفته است
elsy1 (2023-02-20 09:04:52+00:00): He also insults without telling the reason for his vandal edits
elsy1 (2023-02-20 09:06:14+00:00): این مورد چه ربطی به نشان دارد ویرایش های شما مشکل دارد و حتی به کامنت های دیگر کاربران نیز جواب نمیدید و توهین میکنید!  اینجا جای این کارها نیست و به راحتی حساب شما بسته میشه پس حماقت را تمام کنید
Mahdi Nameghi (2023-02-20 13:55:02+00:00): اینجا نقشه اپن استریت مپ هست و هیچ ارتباطی با هیچ شرکتی ندارد. لطفا ادیت های شخصی خودتون رو روی نقشه اعمال نکنید
eggie (2023-02-20 09:44:27+00:00): Dag Wouter... 
Je vraagt feedback 
Volgens mij begint de voorsoorteerstrook pas vanaf het viaduct Molenweg.
Overigens beter geen wegen splitsen met editor iD. Daar kunnen de routerelaties niet tegen.
Splitsen kan wel met editor JOSM.
editor josm stap voor stap 

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710        

 

MVG
eggie
WouterEnsing (2023-02-20 10:30:02+00:00): Bedankt! Ik had alleen maar de tag 'Turn:lanes' toegevoegd. Heb ik daarmee de weg geplistst? Sorry, dat was niet mijn bedoeling.
eggie (2023-02-20 10:54:29+00:00): De weg had je niet gesplitst, maar dat zou eigenlijk wel moeten als die uitvoegstrook pas verderop komt.... Dat was even de vraag of dat klopt.. maar dat splitsen kan alleen met editor JOSM.
Die zul je dus 'moeten' installeren.
Er loopt 1 routerelatie van de N weg 
Er is nu niets stuk.
Editor iD gooit namelijk de delen van een routerelatie door elkaar. 
De volgorde gaat verloren. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-02-20 10:56:44+00:00): Ik heb voor de zekerheid even zelf een splits met josm gezet ter hoogte van viaduct Molenweg waar ik de pijlen zie verschijnen. Je moet maar even kijken waar die slight_right dan begint. 

Groet
eggie
WouterEnsing (2023-02-20 11:12:27+00:00): Volgens mij staat het goed zo. Bedankt! Ik zal JOSM gebruiken vanaf nu.
eggie (2023-02-20 11:24:00+00:00): Oke..., maar als je traject klopte kan m'n splits weer weg.
De splits heb ik dus weer weggehaald bij de Molenweg. 
JOSM is een aanrader. Daar zul je toch niet aan kunnen ontkomen.
Mapse
eggie
arcanma (2023-02-20 13:42:43+00:00): Salve santorellidigitale, benvenuto in OSM, grazie di contribuire alla 'nostra' mappa.
Probabilmente per errore hai raddrizzato il percorso del fosso che corre nei pressi degli edifici che hai aggiunto, vedo che usi Josm e ci sono delle scorciatoie da tastiera per molte funzioni, penso tu abbia premuto il tasto L inavvertitamente dopo aver selezionato il fosso. L'ho ripristinato, fortunatamente Josm consente di fare facilmente molte operazioni, anche correggere errori :-)
user_11609320 (2023-03-24 10:43:29+00:00): it is pretty accurate for terminal 2. the sidewalk/footpath in the middle is the indoor corridor that staff uses. for the first floor. there is a footpath right next to the entrance. on the west side of the first floor, the ticket counters are located for volaris/china airlines/alaska/avianca/delta/frontier/jetblue/united. 

Alaska airlines is near the stairs/bathroom, then delta, followed by volaris, frontier, jet blue, united and china airlines. Can't remember if avianca was east or west of volaris, but i am pretty sure it is in between volaris and delta

in the middle, there is an stairs heading to the TSA checkpoint. Also behind the stairs is the first floor bathrooms. on the east side of the terminal on  first floor is baggage claim area