piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Glassman (2024-11-24 22:29:04+00:00): DWG - Google does not allow use of their maps for improving OSM. Please do not do so in the future. The 3 changesets that have google as a source will be redacted. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google for more information.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159521272
Glassman (2024-11-24 22:29:11+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159521272
Glassman (2024-11-24 22:44:46+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159521272
Glassman (2024-11-24 22:29:32+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159521287
PcMouse1 (2024-11-24 09:24:04+00:00): Hello sswedz,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thank you for your contributions! I am contacting you due to a requested review. Everything seems good but I would like to remind you that Google Maps cannot be used as a source due to copyright and TOS restrictions. 
If you have any further questions please contact the OSM community at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contact_channels or reply to this message.
Cheers, PcMouse1
Bienson (2024-11-24 15:26:23+00:00): Wieso hast du den Poller https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/672779859 an eine falsche Position verschoben?
Im Fokus (2024-11-25 00:26:53+00:00): versehentlich, unbemerkt
aharvey (2024-12-23 01:53:14+00:00): I've partially reverted this change in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159521567 to restore the bus stop to a location not glued to the park boundary
bxl-forever (2024-11-24 09:50:27+00:00): Hello,

I am writing to you because your changeset has a few serious issues.

Mixing companies names and building numbers is not the correct way to map on OSM.  Those are two different things.

The correct tag for addresses is "addr:housenumber".  In many cases it will be on the building outline itself.  The name of companies is… just the name of the company, no more.  The recommended way to map companies in a building is by adding a floating point inside the building (with two tags: office=company and name=…, and possibly more tags like website or description) while keeping the address on the building outline.

I will try to fix as much as I can in this area.  Please try to follow the correct guidelines for your future edits.

Happy mapping.
emersonveenstra (2024-11-25 22:51:08+00:00): Hi there,

"highway=water_path" is not a valid tag, did you perhaps mean to use https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:attraction%3Dwater_slide ?
emersonveenstra (2024-11-26 12:36:58+00:00): Also, you added https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1337308826 with no tags. Objects need to have tags so it's clear what they are. You can search through JOSM presets, or search the wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/ to find good tags, or describe what it is and i can help you find the right tags
Aenet (2024-11-29 23:18:25+00:00): I'll change the highway from "water_path" to "path" for now, those ways were meant to indicate traffic flows within a pool area, both after exiting a water slide and for approaching stairs. Is there a tag that I can use to indicate that the path is used for these purposes, or simply to indicate that they are paths within the water? I could add swimming=yes to these, as I had with the lazy river (which this tag is also not listed on the wiki for highway, should I change it?), although I don't know if I should be using key:swimming in the same way as key:foot. 
Also, I am going to mark most of the waterpark features as indoor=yes to fix them being rendered when only trying to render normal outdoor features (except for the slides, because they run outside the building, unless you think it would be better to mark these indoor=yes also, since they are only accessible from the inside. I also wanted to add a level tag and stairs, to better indicate the levels you must ascend to reach the top of the slide, although I don't know what level the water slides would be marked as, since they go from the top [about the 2nd or 3rd level or level=1 or 2] all the way to the bottom).
As for the untagged way, it is a bodyboarding machine which has water flow up a slope so that people can bodyboard on it. To the best of my knowledge it has no other purpose, and it is not deep enough to swim in anyway, so marking it as a swimming pool seems incorrect. I don't see tags for bodyboarding on the wiki, so maybe the surfing tag could be used there.
Aenet (2024-11-29 23:45:56+00:00): I am going to tag the bodyboarding pool ("FlowRider") as leisure=playground and sport=surfing for now to indicate that it is a facility primarily for children to bodyboard/surf
emersonveenstra (2024-11-30 20:53:12+00:00): > I'll change the highway from "water_path" to "path" for now, those ways were meant to indicate traffic flows within a pool area, both after exiting a water slide and for approaching stairs. Is there a tag that I can use to indicate that the path is used for these purposes, or simply to indicate that they are paths within the water? 

I'm not sure those are meant to be tagged, a pool is inherently unroutable since it's a body of water, and I don't know of a standardized tagging for "suggested paths through water". Probably the best thing to do is look up other waterparks and see what tagging they have.

> (which this tag is also not listed on the wiki for highway, should I change it?),

No, the wiki should only be changed if there's a large usage of the tag
Aenet (2024-11-30 21:32:13+00:00): > I'm not sure those are meant to be tagged, a pool is inherently unroutable since it's a body of water, and I don't know of a standardized tagging for "suggested paths through water". 

I might have been unclear, I'm not trying to suggest paths through the water, but rather, that is the direction of active water flow/current (as a result of the water slides), although those are also the paths exiting the water slide current (either out of the pool area or into the lazy river, which I marked according to current flow).

> No, the wiki should only be changed if there's a large usage of the tag

I wasn't meaning that the wiki should be changed, rather asking if I should change the tag on the object. Anyway, I did change the tag, from highway=lazy_river to leisure=lazy_river
emersonveenstra (2024-12-02 23:37:12+00:00): Oh, i see, i'm not aware of any tagging for that then, sorry

Worth noting that "leisure=swimming_pool"+"swimming_pool=lazy_river" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:swimming_pool#Alternative_usage)  seems to have more usage than leisure=lazy_river
HellMap (2024-11-24 10:33:13+00:00): Kādēļ atkal tiek dzēsti elementi nevis laboti?

Izdzēstas vēl ieejas https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4191524139/history .

Jau iepriekš minēts, ka Bing in nobīde, un šeit ēka pārzīmēta ar nobīdi.

Kādēļ izdzēsts teritorijas laukums https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/496678532/history ? Ja šeit ir cita veida lietojums, tad tas ir jānomaina, jāatzīmē.
umapjpnic793 (2024-11-24 11:22:11+00:00): こんにちは、編集していただきありがとうございます、申し訳ないのですが、いくつかの道路で誤編集してしまっているようです。
当変更セットでn307676190とn3281275675の位置が移動されているようです
再度内容を確認していただき、自分で修正をするか、修正をお願いしてみましょう。
umapjpnic793 (2024-11-30 17:00:17+00:00): 追伸、修正されたため、解決済みとします。
rskedgell (2024-11-24 07:57:12+00:00): Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap and many thanks for contributing to this project.

I would like to make a couple of suggestions which might further improve the mapping for pedestrian navigation:

1) For most sidewalks in central London should probably be tagged with surface=paving_stones - although the paving stones may be mode out of concrete, surface=concrete is generally used for a poured concrete surface. In this area, a concrete surface is generally used only for service roads and as a temporary measure during construction works.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface%3Dpaving_stones

2) When you add a kerb node, please avoid putting it on the main line of the sidewalk. From the wiki:
"Please do not add a barrier=kerb on a node joining the footways near the crossing (e.g. sidewalk footway joining with footway crossing the road). That would implicate that such kerbs block not only crossing the road, but also just using the sidewalk (i.e. without intending to cross the road), which is almost never the case - and which has a big implication for several classes of users (most notably, wheelchair users)."
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dkerb#On_a_node
HellMap (2024-11-24 10:41:40+00:00): Kā iepriekš minēts, Bing ir nobīde un viss šeit jauniezīmētais ir ar pāri metram nobīdi. Lūdzu pielīdzināt Bing slāni un izlabot nobīdi, lai neveidotu papildus darbu citiem nākotnē.

Un lūdzu izlabot arī iepriekš minētās vietas Rīgā, kurās joprojām ir nobīde, nevis turpināt rediģēt jaunas vietas ar nepareizu nobīdi.
HellMap (2024-11-24 10:26:51+00:00): Kāds ir avots šādai parka sadalīšanai divās daļās? Te nav 2 parki. Esošā parka robeža ir zīmēta no kadastra līnijām/robežām. Ja tie neatbilst faktiskai teritorijai, tad labojamas ir konkrētas vietas, bet nekas nav dzēšams. Un laukumu punkti ceļiem nav jāpievieno.

Kāpēc ir izdzēsti koku/meža laukumi?
thopf (2024-11-24 21:53:11+00:00): Hallo JUC!

Danke, dass du bei der OpenStreetMap mitwirkst. 

Ich möchte dich dennoch auf ein paar Aspekte aufmerksam machen. Mir ist aufgefallen, dass du über das gesamte Schulgelände "building=school" getaggt hast. Das würde bedeutet, dass das gesamte Gelände flächendeckend ein Gebäude wäre. Das trifft wohl in Realität nicht zu.
Außerdem hast die den Rand des Schulgelände mit einer Relation "type=boundary" getaggt. Die Relation type=boundary ist ausschließlich für politische, administrative und naturschutzrechtliche Grenzen, dgl. vorgesehen. Auch das trifft hier nicht zu.
Ich werde diese Änderung rückgängig machen.

Wenn du Fragen hast, kannst du diese gerne  auch in der OSM Community stellen: https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/at/59
Du kannst dich auch in der OSM Wiki über das (korrekte) Tagging informieren: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Hauptseite

LG,
thopf.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-08 04:15:19+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164659495
ezio_m (2024-11-25 15:02:23+00:00): ciao azdenardi,
gli itinerari, come il "Percorso ciclopedonale Vittorio Veneto - Laghi di Revine" vanno mappati con delle relazioni.
le highway=cycleway vanno usate solamente per vere e proprie infrastrutture ciclabili, quindi percorsi in sede propria.
gentilmente, elimina i percorsi che non sono piste ciclabili e trasformali in itinerario.
grazie
george1201 (2024-11-29 06:35:43+00:00): Dann sollte man es auch eintragen, also
motor_vehicle=agricultural;forestry
siehe
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:motor_vehicle%3Dagricultural;forestry
MarkusHD (2024-12-24 16:05:43+00:00): Ich hatte mich vor vielen Jahren dazu entschieden, in diesen Fällen auf die Angabe mehrerer Werte zu verzichten und den besser passenden von beiden einzutragen. Der Grund waren vermutlich Bedenken, ob die Router dieses etwas verpönte Tagging unterstützen, siehe auch
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multiple_values

Vielleicht ist es an der Zeit, diese Vorgehensweise zu überdenken. Die von dir verlinkten Wiki-Seite ist aber auch gerade mal 4 Monate alt und mit dem Wert "agricultural;forestry" auch sehr spezifisch, denn u.a. die Reihenfolge sollte eigentlich keinen Unterschied machen.
george1201 (2024-12-27 23:42:38+00:00): Die von dir genannte Wikiseite verbietet Multiple values aber auch nicht grundsätzlich. Ich lese dort "Use MV tagging if... None of the above applies but you still need multiple values." Das trifft hier nach meinem Empfinden zu.
george1201 (2025-01-02 15:51:54+00:00): Spricht was dagegen es so zu machen, wie ich es im ersten Kommentar vorgeschlagen habe? Im Moment ist der Access-Wert für Motorfahrzeuge ja nicht ganz richtig.
george1201 (2025-01-11 12:22:49+00:00): Die Aufzählung hw="agricultural;forestry" scheint verbreitet zu sein. Man findet viele Fundstellen. Ich habe es deshalb so am Weg eingetragen.
MarkusHD (2025-01-11 22:28:45+00:00): Sorry für die ausbleibende Antwort. Wollte mich erst noch informieren, wie der Support in z.B. Routern aussieht, komme aber nicht dazu.
Ja, laut Taginfo ist das sehr verbreitet. Bin komplett einverstanden mit deiner Änderung, auch wenn ich mir das nochmal durch den Kopf gehen lassen müsste, bevor ich dieses Tagging selbst anwende.
george1201 (2025-01-11 22:36:30+00:00): Gibt es Alternativen? Wie soll man sonst am Weg kennzeichnen, dass nur Bauern und Waldarbeiter mit ihren motorgetriebenen Fahrzeugen dort fahren dürfen?
MarkusHD (2025-01-12 21:14:04+00:00): Nein, Alternativen dafür gibt es vermutlich nicht.
eggie (2024-11-24 09:19:49+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Tjuro (2024-11-24 11:30:38+00:00): Beste Embertorchclaw,

Welkom bij OpenStreetMap, ik heb even de club gebouwen opnieuw geimporteerd van uit de BAG.

Verder als tips:
dingen zoals waterveld en zandveld dienen niet in de name= opgenomen te worden. Daar hebben we in veel gevallen andere tags voor of hoort thuis in de beschrijving.

De velden dienen uitgelijnd te worden op de veld belijning, niet op tot hoever het oppervlak van het veld gaat.

Ik hoop dat je wat hebt aan deze tips.

Met vriendelijke groet,

Tjuro
user_22214777 (2024-11-24 16:15:43+00:00): Hoi Tjuro, 

Dat is een beetje een rare situatie dan waarmee de BAG niet overeen komt met de werkelijke situatie daar. Als ik kijk in het BRK dan is het westelijke deel van het gebouw, Ullevi 34 alleen in erfpacht aan de hockeyvereniging. Het westelijke pand is opgedeeld feitelijk opgedeeld in drie stukken, waarbij het zuidelijke deel de kleedkamers zijn van de hockeyvereniging, het middendeel de kleedkamers van de honkbalvereniging en het noordelijke deel is een apart perceel van de gemeente waar dus de honkbalclub zijn kantine in heeft. Gek genoeg zitten beide adressen allen op het noordelijke perceel en heeft het de rest deze niet. Het lijkt er dan ook op dat de hockeyvereniging het verkeerde adres gebruikt en 34 hoort te gebruiken. 

Wat betreft de naamgeving van de velden, ik heb die in Groningen als voorbeeld genomen, het type is namelijk ook de gebruikte naam voor het veld.
lomsw (2024-11-24 11:45:10+00:00): 3h later, I just realized I checked review_requested when I uploaded from JOSM. lol
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-18 04:26:49+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165095187
dmfr (2024-12-01 00:22:50+00:00): Olá caro!

Alterei o COTF de amenity=school para amenity=trade_school, uma vez que o COTF não confere nenhum grau equivalente ao ensino obrigatório (até ao 12º ano de escolaridade). O COTF oferece formações profissionais de curta duração (8-25h de formação) sobre Gestão de Florestas, pelo que considero que seria mais adequado estar como amenity=trade_school, e adicionalmente training=forestry para clarificar que é um centro de formação para a gestão florestal.

Com os melhores cumprimentos.
Reino Baptista (2024-12-01 09:20:50+00:00): Olá,

Obrigado pelo apuramento da classificação do local.

Devo confessar que desconhecia "amenity=trade_school" (Escola Profissional/Vocacional) assim como "training=*". Sempre a aprender...

Cumprimentos,
RB
Filohipo (2024-12-02 15:53:12+00:00): Qual a diferença entre este edificio e o que está mais próximo das pistas: Centro de Formação Especializado em Incêndios Florestais (553373796) ?
dmfr (2024-12-02 15:58:17+00:00): É que ainda não tive tempo de mudar :)

Agora fora de brincadeiras. Já tinha reparado que a escola ao lado também estava como amenity=school, vou alterar para amenity=trade_school, training=fire_fighting.
RSergei (2024-11-24 08:52:33+00:00): Забыл добавить комментарий, поэтому пишу дополнительно.
Трасса для автокросса и картинг-центр в Берёзовском
kenken234 (2024-11-24 13:18:04+00:00): Hi, I believe that you are trying to make the map render look better and show all the service roads like the garbage collection access road but they should be T-junctions instead of triangles if there is no physical barrier/divider. OSM data should be based on real life and not for render. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
user_22117725 (2024-11-25 06:08:53+00:00): Apologies kenken234… I got too focused on following the curvatures of the roads. Fortunately, it was a pretty easy fix and I’ve removed the triangles. I very much appreciated your help!
tastrax (2024-11-24 09:53:10+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, +61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features#Phone_Numbers .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
SSALDKAR (2024-11-24 09:58:44+00:00): ahhh yep, easy. sorry about that.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-11-25 02:19:27+00:00): Complex mapping should be done on a full featured desktop editor. Your edits have caused a number of issues and you're not using proper changeset comments.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159525020
eggie (2024-11-24 09:26:51+00:00): Dag Ember.. Hier heb ik de landuse grass hersteld.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=159525291

MVG
eggie
silversurfer83 (2024-11-24 12:37:30+00:00): Hi :)

drei kleine Hinweise:

- https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5795484831 hab ich korrigiert

- bitte schreibe bessere Kommentare. Siehe: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

- bitte halte deinen Änderungen geografisch kompakt. Siehe:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

happy mapping
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159525441
ljc_jlyb (2024-11-24 09:50:03+00:00): 手误（大蒲柴河镇）
eggie (2024-11-24 10:36:12+00:00): Welkom bij OSM...  De info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode.

MVG
eggie
HellMap (2024-11-24 10:43:50+00:00): Kādēļ tika izdzēsts https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/912536668/history ?

Kā iepriekš, tiek izdzēsts elements https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/912536665/history tā vietā, lai to izlabotu.

Kas tās par sienām https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1337336277 ? Jau iepriekš tika minēts par šādu neatbilstošu tegošanu renderēšani. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer

Estrādes skatuve https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1337336306 nav `highway=pedestrian`.

Lūdzu atbildēt uz izmaiņu problēmu komentāriem un izlabot iepriekšējās izmaiņas pirms turpināt jaunu rediģēšanu. Ir sakrājies jau liels skaits are neizlabotām lietām.
ChrissW-R1 (2025-01-11 23:22:32+00:00): Wieso wurde bei https://osm.org/way/288818548 der Tag service=driveway entfernt? Vor Ort sah es für mich sehr nach einer Zufahrt aus.
Pajopath (2025-01-12 12:45:55+00:00): Soweit ich die Doku und die discussionen im Forum zu den Service subcategories verstanden habe, wäre dies nur ein Highway Service ohne Zusatz. Parkplatz gilt nicht da dass nur zwischen den Spuren verwendet werden soll. Driveway wäre die grundstückszufahrt zu EINEM Gebäude.  Da es sich hierbei aber um die Zufahrt zu einem Parkhaus/Parkdeck handelt wäre das nicht gültig. Analog zu Grundstückszufahrten mit mehrten Gebäuden drauf. Dann wären maximal die einzelnen hofeinfahrten driveway aber der hauptzugang ein regulärer Service ohne sub.
ChrissW-R1 (2025-01-12 22:47:49+00:00): Ok, danke für die Erklärung.
shu0410 (2024-11-26 21:26:45+00:00): wth u r saying about 
Even if your edit is correct, please be civil, including your name and description of the edit
user_18023081 (2024-11-26 21:35:31+00:00): @shu0140 the edit is incorrect (they just removed buildings for no reason)
user_18023081 (2024-11-26 21:39:35+00:00): I reverted it.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159635457
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-29 05:35:35+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5779326453/history has access:bicycle = yes that was added in this edit
Would using bicycle access tag (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bicycle ) be fitting at least equally well?

Usage statistics are sometimes wrong and should not be blindly followed, but are worth looking at - see http://taghistory.raifer.tech/#***/bicycle/&***/access%3Abicycle/
PattaFeuFeu (2025-04-29 06:22:50+00:00): Oh, thank you! I’ve changed it in a follow-up changeset.
HellMap (2024-11-24 11:24:56+00:00): Šajā izmaiņā atkal tiek dzēsi elementi. Ir sabojātā maršrutēšana. Nodzēsti savienojumi. Un pārzīmēts neprecīzi.

Kas tas par "Vexcel" avotu, kas šeit tiek izmantots?

Lūdzu pārtraukt šādu rediģēšanu.
eggie (2024-11-24 11:11:01+00:00): Dag Ember   De school heeft hier twee namen?
Het vlak heeft een andere naam dan de node. Zandpol en CB de Zwaluw?

Zijn hier twee scholen?

Wanneer je het vlak wil behouden dan de schoolinfo van het adres halen..  Wel het adres dan intact houden. 

MVG
eggie
user_22214777 (2024-11-24 11:36:07+00:00): De oude naam van de school was CB de Zandpol, ik denk dat dat daar vandaan komt. Er is dus maar één school. Is het dan aan te raden de namen gelijk te maken van het gebouw en de schoolzone?
eggie (2024-11-24 12:07:07+00:00): Hoi.. nee.. maak een keuze.
Op het schoolterrein rendert het mooi.
Gewoon de adresnode ontdoen van de oude naam en de regel amenity=school.
Scholen kunnen op meer manieren.
Wanneer er meer scholen in een gebouw zitten gebruiken we de adresnodes.
Mapse..
eggie
eggie (2024-11-24 13:30:45+00:00): Wanneer het echt de ingebruik zijnde namen van die velden zijn zou het kunnen, maar als het beschrijvingen zijn dan description gebruiken en niet name=

MVG
eggie
user_22214777 (2024-11-24 16:20:29+00:00): Hoi Eggie,

Het zijn inderdaad de namen van de velden zoals die bij de club gevoerd worden.
Marek-M (2024-11-24 19:42:35+00:00): Cześć - tutaj jest duplikat Top Market, co jest błędem. POI ma być albo w węźle albo na budynku, wybierz jedno z rozwiązań :)
pyrog (2025-01-09 16:05:07+00:00): Bonjour Virgile,

Tu as cassé 2 itinéraires du réseau de carrefour.
Peut-être en fusionnant des ways au niveau du Col de Clémencières ?

https://knooppuntnet.nl/fr/analysis/node/95083699/changes

J'ai corrigé.

Cordialement,
Yves

PS: "M réso : Flexo 55/56"
Tu faisais de la maintenance d'itinéraires de bus ?
Virgile1994 (2025-01-14 12:11:11+00:00): Oui, je suis en train de mettre à jour le réseau Grenoblois.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2024-11-24 14:22:27+00:00): HI! Please always put access=private on private pools so they are not counted as publicly accessible. Thanks!
NorthCrab_upload (2024-11-24 12:00:49+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1337350215

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eggie (2024-11-24 13:27:15+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community