piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
AndreaDp271 (2026-06-24 19:48:17+00:00): Ciao benvenuto su openstreetmap, ti chiedo di vedere questo edit e l'altro, fai attenzione alle forme, devono rispecchiare la forma reale dell'edificio, delle siepi, cancelli, alberi ecc. Fai attenzione alla prospettiva delle immagini satellitari, cerca di "immaginare" la correzione.
AndreaDp271 (2026-06-24 19:51:48+00:00): Vieni a trovarci su telegram:
- Italia: https://t.me/OpenStreetMapItalia
- Veneto: https://t.me/osm_veneto
eggie (2026-06-24 16:12:56+00:00): Ik heb een algemene companytag toegevoegd. Je ziet anders geen naam.
Landnaam hoeft niet en hoort ook niet Netherlands te zijn. 
Ik heb Netherlands verwijderd en al die naammogelijkheden.. Alleen name= behouden.

MVG
eggie
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-22 03:46:20+00:00): SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Business POIs added to the map must be visitable physical locations that are verifiable on the ground. See https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more information.

Reverted SEO spam POI in a private residential dwelling, with no apparent verifiable location on the ground, in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/186153330
eggie (2026-06-24 15:20:11+00:00): Welkom bij osm.
Bedankt voor uw bijdrage.
Het is goed om te weten dat we de bedrijfsinfo op de adresnode bijtaggen. Niet op de gebouwomtrek.
Mvg
eggie
eggie (2026-06-24 16:05:37+00:00): De info heb ik verplaatst en garagetag toegevoegd
JakovBušić (2026-06-24 14:06:49+00:00): Updating state truck designated routes #OptimoRoute
STMIKPLK GROUP GIS 26_004 (2026-06-24 15:05:15+00:00): Koreksi data salah input
FajrAl (2026-06-25 02:11:07+00:00): Mohon untuk tiap parit atau drainase yang melewati jalan untuk diberi tag gorong-gorong. Setahun lalu ada grup STMIKPLK GROUP GIS 25 yang malah memberi tag `ford` alias harus mengarungi air.

https://maproulette.org/browse/challenges/54197
FajrAl (2026-06-25 02:12:07+00:00): Contoh tag yang dimaksud: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12919162993
alpacaMaps (2026-07-27 03:13:45+00:00): This changeset adds one or more surveillance cameras in a spot that looks unlikely — the nodes sit well away from any road, which usually means the cameras aren't physically present on the ground.

If these cameras are real, please let us know so the map stays accurate. Otherwise, we'd kindly ask that you avoid adding cameras that aren't actually there, and that you remove any temporary or test nodes once you're done.

If this was simply a mistake, no problem at all — just clean up the nodes that don't correspond to a real-world camera, and leave a quick note here so we can help.

Thanks for helping keep OpenStreetMap accurate.

— alpacaMaps
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-30 07:48:26+00:00): Cleaned up remaining SEO spam and other mistagging for POI in changeset 184839384

https://osm.org/changeset/184839384
eggie (2026-07-19 07:04:13+00:00): Hoi,

De naam van de halteplaats heb ik veranderd naar Visschersbuurt ipv Visschersplaat.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-07-19 07:10:49+00:00): Alsnog veranderd conform website Riveer.. zowel halteplaatsen als veerroute
Dordrecht Kerkeplaat-Papendrecht Visschersbuurt
en Dordrecht Kerkeplaat-Papendrecht Rosmolenweg
caprieldeluca (2026-06-24 15:29:20+00:00): Hola, gracias por colaborar con el mapa!  
Revisé el conjunto de cambios, habían edificios con paredes que los atravesaban, hice las correcciones.  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Argentina#Contacto
Sol Elizabeth Riehme (2026-06-29 16:38:13+00:00): Hola! Muchas gracias, saludos.
Supaplex (2026-06-25 04:49:36+00:00): 請使用有意義的changeset comment來總結您的編輯，如：中和一帶道路交叉，而非無意義的一個英文字母
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184525951
Access Claims (komoot) (2026-06-24 14:55:34+00:00): Path re-adjusted to access=destination bycicles=no.
Last changeset 184528328
rajdhani (2026-06-25 09:33:32+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184574180
yelisey90 (2026-06-24 19:31:03+00:00): Definitely not residential; and please do not remove tracktype & surface unless you are sure that the surface has changed.
Fixed: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184541702
aibek55 (2026-06-25 06:33:14+00:00): Thanks for fixing it.
eggie (2026-06-24 15:32:32+00:00): Welkom Armaaan bij osm...
Probeer als het kan op de bestaande adresnode bij te taggen.
Mvg,
eggie
eggie (2026-06-24 16:02:28+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  Het is oke zo
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
SereneDeluge (2026-06-28 16:03:25+00:00): Hello! I saw you added the cycle lanes to the sidewalk. I've moved them to the main road with cycleway=lane since they are apart of it instead of the sidewalk.
I only touched a few segments so it's possible more need to be moved over.
Thanks for contributing :D
Elboson (2026-07-06 10:23:08+00:00): Hey! Thanks for the edit. You are absolutely right, the cycle lane along Skolgatan from Svartbäcksgatan to Kungsgatan is a part of the road. I think i did it the other way cause I wanted the path to be visible as an option for bikes, but your way is probably better.
eggie (2026-06-24 16:09:27+00:00): Dag B Berlee.  
Je hebt een pad verwijderd op de begraafplaats. Waarom?


MVG
eggie
B Berlee (2026-06-25 15:59:56+00:00): Oh excuus, ik dacht dat ik per ongeluk een pad had toegevoegd door verkeerd te klikken, waarna ik deze wilde verwijderen. Dit was niet de bedoeling. Had je hem alweer hersteld, of moet ik daar even naar kijken?
eggie (2026-06-25 16:07:36+00:00): Hoi.. Je zou even kunnen kijken. Volgens  mij was het een doodlopend stukje. Geen halsxaak. 😀
Kijk nu op mn mobiel.
Mapse
eggie (2026-06-25 16:10:08+00:00): Je edit https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=184527855#20/52.13012/5.09184
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-06-24 15:29:20+00:00): ops, złe wikipedia=
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-06-24 15:29:42+00:00): poprawiłem
bielebog (2026-06-28 09:56:12+00:00): Hallo, in diesem Changeset wurde der aktuell leerstehende Laden in der Ferdinandstraße 2, in dem sich vorher der Massagesalon "An-Mo" befand, gelöscht:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4053519529/history . Da das Ladengeschäft weiterhin vorhanden ist, hat es sich etabliert, bei sowas den 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
zu nuzen und den Node mit disused:* - Präfix zu versehen oder als shop=vacant. Zum einen ist auch die Information über Leerstände interessant, zum anderen bleibt bei einer Neuvermietung die Historie des Objekts erhalten.

Den Node 4053519529 werde ich gleich reverten - aufgefallen ist mir das nur, da An-Mo an den Konrad-Martin-Platz umgezogen ist.
derbossmapper (2026-06-28 12:19:36+00:00): Hi Bieleblog, danke für den Hinweis, beachte ich normalerweise, war wohl ein Versehen :)
DwarfNebula_ (2026-06-25 10:50:49+00:00): Hi, ik zie dat je gisteren meerdere objecten hebt toegevoegd met in de openingstijden "Thu" als afkorting. Alle dagen worden met twee letter afgekort, dus ik heb het aangepast naar "Th".
Wereldkaart123 (2026-06-25 14:28:49+00:00): Hoi, bedankt voor je hulp/opmerkzaamheid en sorry voor t extra werk. K zal het in het vervolg op twee letters houden :)
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-06-24 18:19:02+00:00): That was an interesting choice to extend the trunk road all the way to the intersection. Considering how the primary road of Lake Mead Parkway doesn't extend all the way to Lake Las Vegas Parkway, I tried to replicate that here. What's the difference between here and there?
Joseph R P (2026-06-24 18:33:18+00:00): This is different because it is a 4-way intersection. Traffic can make movements to Three Notch Rd from the secondary section of Three Notch Rd, Great Mills Rd, and Cedar Point Rd, and traffic on the trunk section of Three Notch Rd can continue straight or make a left turn onto Cedar Point Rd.
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-06-24 20:25:04+00:00): I see. Thanks again!
B252697 (2026-06-24 15:41:02+00:00): Official source from NParks which I referenced: https://www.nparks.gov.sg/docs/default-source/parks-docs/springleaf-nature-park/springleaf-nature-park-map.pdf
eggie (2026-06-24 15:46:59+00:00): This is a duplicated way. Just remove it.
Tag the existing road
eggie (2026-06-24 16:00:09+00:00): That had no use.. I removed the duplicated way and tagged the exceptiontag oneway:bicycle=no

motor_vehicle=no is wrong anyway.
aceman444 (2026-07-14 12:34:33+00:00): Ak momentalne trasa nie je pouzivana, mozeme ju oznacit ako disused=yes. Alebo ak ju chcete skryt z mapy, tak napr. type=disused:route . Zatial by sme ju inak mohli ponechat, lebo ak ju obnovia, je dost pracne ju zase pridat nanovo.

Ano webstranka v 'source' presmerovava na https://sut.stefaniktrail.sk/ a je tam ina trasa "Strefanik urban trail BA50". Mono by sa dala pridat ta.
ticho2 (2026-07-14 21:16:50+00:00): Ahoj, o tagu type=disused:route som nevedel, mozno by sa sem fakt hodil. Alebo to mozme nechat tak, oficialne sa tento trail uz sice nebeha, ale urcite sa najdu nadsenci ktori si to bud prejdu alebo prebehnu aj sukromne, a im by sa mohlo hodit ze na mape najdu trasu.

Mozno by bolo lepsie nechat to tak, a pridat tag note alebo description kde sa spomenie ze trasa je uz len neoficialna?

Podla mojich informacii je nepravdepodobne ze by oficialne preteky niekedy obnovili, povodny majitel to momentalne nechce odovzdat nikomu dalsiemu - ale ktovie, moze sa to v buducnosti zmenit. Preto suhlasim ze mazat to by bola skoda.
ticho2 (2026-07-14 21:18:25+00:00): Trasu Stefanik Urban Trail by samozrejme nebolo zle pridat. Casom sa k tomu mozno dostanem, ale zatial bol len prvy rocnik, takze mozno sa trasa este bude menit, uvidime. To je ale uz ina tema. :)
aceman444 (2026-07-19 10:32:02+00:00): Dobre, tak potom ta verzia s disused=yes a nejaku informaciu do description.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-25 02:42:02+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with blatant advertising, malformed tags and possibly sourced from Google Maps, in changeset 184559120

https://osm.org/changeset/184559120
eggie (2026-06-24 16:35:14+00:00): The direction is okay The exception is okay.. But motor_vehicle=no looks weird?
Why..?
Also horse=no
eggie (2026-06-24 16:44:46+00:00): If there are only C3 and C2 signs the street is open for all traffic in one direction
..oneway=yes will do the job...
..oneway:bicycle=no is the exception on oneway=yes.
So no need for motor_vehicle=no.
pepdeb (2026-06-24 16:50:11+00:00): ok. So it's ok now? There is a C2 sign -- no motorvehicules  / horses / etc. allowed.
Bicycles permitted (exeption - see little white sign)
eggie (2026-06-24 17:02:52+00:00): Yes ..in one direction
Your tag will block the routing
eggie (2026-06-24 21:06:42+00:00): I removed  motor_vehicle and horse=no from the onewaystreet.
Those accesstags have nothing to do with oneway=yes.
It's oneway=yes will do the job with exception from bicycle 
.... oneway:bicycle=no  
So from the south to the north it will route for all traffic and from the north to the south only for bicycle.

Greetz,
eggie
caprieldeluca (2026-06-24 17:29:35+00:00): Hola, muchas gracias por sus contribuciones, pero el comentario de sus changesets, además de incorrectos y no aportar información útil, están siendo etiquetados como vandalismo. 
Le agradecería escribir en cada conjunto de cambios una descripción de los cambios realizados, ya que esa es la finalidad de la descripción del changeset. Saludos.
serock (2026-06-25 01:15:33+00:00): Hola caprieldeluca, no sabía que estaban siendo etiquetando como vandalismo los changesets con comentarios genéricos.

Como suelo realizar muchos cambios en un mismo changeset, mis ediciones están orientadas a una revisión general y no a algo específico; por eso no detallo cada cambio de forma individual. Hace varios años que me enfoco en esto (lo que dice mi comentario), y mi intención siempre es aportar y mejorar la información de OSM.

Saludos!!!
caprieldeluca (2026-06-26 16:14:09+00:00): Gracias por responder.
Creo que su comentario anterior es incorrecto. Cada conjunto de cambios podría describirse correctamente al cerrar sin ningún inconveniente.
Pienso que simplemente no está interesado en cerrar sus cambios con comentarios útiles.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenos_comentarios_en_conjuntos_de_cambios
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-24 16:41:15+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 184176173, 184176495, 184177709, 184177963, 184177985, 184178141, 184178230, 184178433, 184181097, 184181936, 184182235, 184183065, 184183957, 184184128, 184184181, 184237957, 184253135, 184254160, 184254648, 184255149, 184255995, 184283037, 184299238, 184299679, 184320986, 184321006, 184327695, 184328479, 184328953, 184329224, 184344706, 184345542, 184346707, 184347043, 184347714, 184354501, 184393689, 184401662, 184401809, 184415806, 184417766, 184417785, 184418428, 184448164, 184489094.
gurglypipe (2026-06-25 17:18:30+00:00): Thanks for tweaking the tagging, and thanks again for your updates in the area. It’s looking more detailed now!
Frank Peng (2026-06-25 04:20:43+00:00): Please make sure to use better changeset comments, what did you change and why? "Kaz" is not sufficient enough to tell the average mapper what you were trying to do here. For more information, please refer to this OSM Wiki article: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184533688
rajdhani (2026-06-26 03:11:03+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184623257
ChrissW-R1 (2026-07-04 18:48:44+00:00): Please check https://osm.org/note/5375193
VLD170 (2026-07-06 17:13:27+00:00): Hello ChrissW-R1, 

Thank you for bringing these issues to our attention. They have been addressed by another community editor while we were investigating them. I have marked the notes as resolved, and we will ensure to monitor for misspelled tags like these in the future. 

Happy mapping,  
VLD 170
Stalker61 (2026-06-25 19:00:08+00:00): Здравствуйте. Опять дублируем адреску на сараи? На 23 и 25 участке адрес уже стоит. Построят дом и адрес законно переедет.
Ozon OSM12 (2026-06-26 17:58:28+00:00): Добрый день! Почему опять? Ошибку поняла, спасибо за исправление. Впредь буду внимательнее!
mueschel (2026-07-06 16:20:01+00:00): Hi,
what does "Horse corral =horse" mean? Please use only the tags that are available as presets in the editor or those that are documented in the Wiki.
Fraxi (2026-06-24 18:33:02+00:00): Здравей!
Коригирах някои тагове:
-върнах типа на сградата, в която се помещава HRC Culinary Academy на "Сграда за търговия" и по кадастър(№68134.204.222.1). Добавих стойност за настоящото ѝ предназначение. Ако приемем, че цялата се използва за това;
-смених ключа за телефонния номер от "telephone" на "phone" Предназначението на "telephone" е друго.
osm.org/changeset/184539115
DressyPear4 (2026-06-24 19:25:48+00:00): Discuta com a comunidade antes de alterar a classificação de vias

https://t.me/OSMBrasil_Comunidade/67754

Adicione comentário em suas edições para que outros possam entender melhor o que você está editando
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Good_changeset_comments

O osm é livre para editar, é só seguir as boas práticas, mas se continuar ignorando, começarei revertendo suas edições e pedirei bloqueio de usuário.
SpaceTracer (2026-06-24 18:29:04+00:00): Correction:
Comment is “Added access tag to barrier on Avenida Los Talleres. #adt”
Source used was Esri World Imagery; Mapillary
thebrad1111 (2026-06-24 18:18:35+00:00): Imagery used: mapbox, os cadastral parcels, bing
Baloo Uriza (2026-07-01 12:58:08+00:00): It appears you've added four cameras to the middle of the intersection, a physically impossible location for the cameras.  Having some knowledge of this intersection, were you trying to map the traffic detection cameras used by the signal controller to see if a bicycle, motorcycle or car is waiting for the signal, and doesn't get recorded or sent anywhere?
SeabeeOIF (2026-07-01 14:21:59+00:00): There are alpr cameras there on the traffic lights poles. It is not the traffic control cameras that run the traffic lights I was reporting.
Baloo Uriza (2026-07-01 22:05:24+00:00): Can you provide a picture of the cameras in question?
LorenGFL (2026-06-30 15:41:01+00:00): Awesome add. I noticed this was missing.
Wildsharky (2026-06-30 09:16:26+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184578755
yelisey90 (2026-06-24 19:42:37+00:00): operator:type=school ?
empty_child (2026-06-25 06:48:12+00:00): Допустим
mueschel (2026-07-06 15:29:09+00:00): Hi,
could you explain the "water hours" here? drinking water is only available on Wednesday?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/190464723

Then I suggest 
drinking_water:conditional = yes @ We
PeeWee32 (2026-06-29 11:08:18+00:00): Ik zie dat je een antal toilet gebouwen een name tag gegevens hebt ( 6,7 en 8)  Dat kan m.i. geen name zijn. Bedoel je misschien een referentie oid?
DwarfNebula_ (2026-06-29 11:59:59+00:00): Die hadden al een name, in eerste instantie was ik het er ook niet helemaal mee eens. Maar kijkend naar https://henschotermeer.nl/zwemmen-en-recreeren worden ze daadwerkelijk zo genoemd. Op de foto's is het nummer ook terug te zien als erop gedrukt. Ik heb het dus maar zo gelaten en alleen naar de openingstijden gekeken die niet klopten.
PeeWee32 (2026-07-01 04:41:04+00:00): Ik zie dat je alleen 6 hebt toegevoegd en dat de andere al bestonden. Mijn fout. https://wcww.openstreetmap.org/way/1334532172/history/2  Het is wel consequent . Het is ook lastig hoe een locale ref aangegeven moet worden. Misschien was Toilet 6  wat duidelijker. Ik zie dat het bij spoornummer op een station ook soms zoiets gedaan wordt. Al lijkt daar  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:railway:track_ref ook gebruikt te worden  Helaas zie ik nergens in OSM een toilets_ref. Ik laat het maar zitten. Groet Peter https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/423874816
DwarfNebula_ (2026-07-01 07:23:24+00:00): Nr 6 heb ik overgenomen van https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1328889979/history/1. Hier stonden twee ways over elkaar heen getekend. Deze heb ik samengevoegd tot 1.
TrickyFoxy (2026-07-13 00:38:01+00:00): aeroway=hangar тут не подходит https://osm.org/way/52164937/history

Можно дополнительно добавить что-то вроде:

building:material=metal
roof:material=metal
roof:shape=round
iuvi (2026-07-13 05:13:22+00:00): спасибо, надо как то попросить добавить подобное в веб редактор iD что бы новички не путали
TrickyFoxy (2026-07-13 09:56:27+00:00): Это можно решить на уровне перевода пресета. Исправил.
iuvi (2026-07-14 05:37:57+00:00): Тогда пресет надо поправитьб в плане - Ангар для авиации и Зздание в виде ангара (или что-то такое)
TrickyFoxy (2026-07-14 09:30:16+00:00): Так и исправил https://app.transifex.com/openstreetmap/id-editor/translate/#ru/presets/449668784?q=translation_text%3Aангар
paoso (2026-07-27 08:30:14+00:00): sam-089,
du hast kürzlich den Pfad https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/290321428 geändert. Ich war vorige Tage dort und konnte ihn trotz intensiver Suche nicht finden. Die Brücke über den Truhenseegraben scheint es auch nicht mehr zu geben. Oder hast du sie gesehen?
Grüße, paoso.
sam-089 (2026-07-27 16:30:40+00:00): Hallo paoso,
am 24.6. waren ab der Verzweigung https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2030625005 beide Wege dermaßen zugewachsen, dass ich davon abgesehen habe, weiterzugehen (Vogelschutz bis Ende Juni, Zecken, ...) Daraufhin habe ich die Erkennbarkeit heruntergestuft. Aber beide Pfade waren dort vorhanden. Über den weiteren Verlauf und die Brücke kann ich demzufolge nichts sagen.
paoso (2026-07-28 07:59:26+00:00): Danke für die Rückmeldung. Dann ist der Weg doch (noch?) nicht disused/abandoned.
Wildsharky (2026-06-30 09:18:18+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184774099
dav23r (2026-07-14 15:50:08+00:00): reverted in -https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185725366 - please, familiarize yourself with mapping practices on OSM, for one, the "One feature - one element" guideline - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element 

Quoting:
> Examples of bad situations:
> Shop in a building mapped as a single object with building=* and shop=* and name=* (which will often apply only to POI). This one is more debatable, and it is generally not treated as obviously wrong as long as all properties are applying to all features at the same time.
MassCartog (2026-06-25 02:42:18+00:00): Hi welcome to OSM! feature behind locked gates are valid to be mapped, please don't remove them, just updated the feature type and access tags if needed, thanks!
Langlaeufer (2026-06-25 13:10:16+00:00): Ist der jetzt nicht fast fertig?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184542507
osmmapper222 (2026-07-05 17:58:16+00:00): Die Zugänge zum Radweg sind alle mit "Betreten verboten"-Schildern und Bauzäunen versehen. Die Schilder werden aber halbherzig ignoriert und die Bauzäune sind teils an die Seite geschoben.

Der Radweg sieht fertig aus, scheint aber nur halb-offiziell nutzbar zu sein.
infeeeee (2026-06-27 10:51:25+00:00): Biztos itt van ez? Kicsit odébb már volt egy a térképen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13333917912

Idén áprilisban itt nem volt még kút: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=2151340462381695
Petró Tamás (2026-06-28 11:56:23+00:00): Sanszos, hogy a Hermész kútra gondolt, mert az meg drinking_water=n volt eddig, pedig lehet belőle ini
b-jazz (2026-06-30 16:57:07+00:00): Hey there Charles,

I cleaned up some errors in this changeset and wanted to let you know about the errors so that you can avoid them in the future. You have set up multipolygon relations between the fairways and greens, and that's just great. But then you took it a step too far and tagged the outer member of those multipolygons as a fairway, which isn't correct. Those tags belong to the relation instead of the outer polygon.

This might help explain it: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ID_understanding_golf_course_relations
Charles_Smothers (2026-07-28 23:32:03+00:00): Thanks - I will read that.
P_kawa (2026-06-24 20:41:02+00:00): DW250 nie jest jedyną drogą udostępnioną do ruchu na terenie poligonu. Dodałem również inne drogi udostępnione przez Lasy Państwowe i oznaczyłem je jako access=destination. Skorygowałem także przebieg granicy terenu zamkniętego (poligonu) w rejonie Brzeczki, Suchatówki i Dąblina, wyłączając obszary z zabudową cywilną, do których prowadzą drogi udostępnione przez LP. Dodatkowo poprawiłem granicę w okolicy stacji kolejowej Toruń Czerniewice, gdzie teren poligonu obejmuje również drogi udostępnione przez Lasy Państwowe. Zmiany wykonano na podstawiedanych z Geoportalu oraz wykazu terenów zamkniętych w resorcie obrony
narodowej. Dodatkowe informacje i dyskusja: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5356652
P_kawa (2026-06-24 20:54:37+00:00): access=destination nadal może nie być odpowiedni, dlatego usunąłem tagi access=* z dróg na których zmieniłem ten tag - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184545861
P_kawa (2026-06-25 08:19:40+00:00): https://www.dz.urz.mon.gov.pl/dziennik/pozycja/decyzja-139-decyzja-nr-116mon-z-dnia-19-sierpnia-2025-r-zmieniajaca-decyzje-w-sprawie-ustalenia-terenow-zamknietych-w-resorcie-obrony-narodowej
gendy54 (2026-07-12 17:41:31+00:00): Salut LySioS,
Tu me confirmes que le nouveau centre de secours est opérationnel? Je n'ai rien trouvé sur Internet à ce sujet.
LySioS (2026-07-12 18:13:39+00:00): L'inauguration officielle s'est faite il y a quelques jours. J'imagine que le centre est opérationnel.
N'ayant pas accès à facebook, je ne peux pas vérifier https://www.facebook.com/people/Sapeurs-Pompiers-de-Rivesaltes/100083334817571/
LySioS (2026-07-12 18:14:49+00:00): Quelques jours = au moins 18 puisque je m'en suis occupé après la communication officielle
gendy54 (2026-07-12 20:57:36+00:00): C'est parfait. Merci.