piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
StC (2025-11-22 15:04:03+00:00): Bonjour !

cette relation semble rassembler des variantes de la grande traversée des Préalpes, il serait sans doute mieux de regrouper l'ensemble ?

Par ailleurs, j'ai constaté que les gestionnaires de la zone (le département ? le CDRP ?) ont converti les Tours du Verdon et Tours du Haut-Verdon en réseaux de boucles comme à beaucoup d'endroits ailleurs en France. J'ai procédé à un regroupement initial, mais cela reste très préliminaire.

Il existe un canal Telegram et un canal Matrix (en plus du forum OSM) où bon nombre de contributeurs orientés plein air (dont quelques pros du secteur de la rando) essayent d'harmoniser leurs pratiques et de coordonner leurs efforts. Tout les contributeurs, et en particulier ceux qui sont actifs et connaissent bien le sujet, sont les bienvenus !
eserte (2025-09-28 16:55:39+00:00): Hallo Emil1887,

ist die Fahrradstraße tatsächlich termingerecht fertig geworden?

-- Slaven
Till_btn (2025-10-01 10:57:38+00:00): Bodenmarkierungen ja, Schilder hingen Montag früh noch keine
Emil1887 (2025-10-01 11:15:34+00:00): Ah spannend, mir war das anders Berichtet worden. Fahre es heute nochmal ab.
Emil1887 (2025-10-01 23:07:38+00:00): Markierungen sind inklusive Markiertem Z 244.1 fertig. Ich denke einige Piktogramme könnten noch fehlen. Schilder sollten dann diese Woche kommen, so kann man es nicht über längere Zeit lassen. Ich fahre es nochmal ab morgen oder Freitag.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-11-25 14:20:05+00:00): Missing one-way and connected in a way where one-way tags would cause navigation issues.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172575167
melcomsx (2025-11-25 18:13:23+00:00): Thankyou for the hint and fixing, I thougth I've have fix it correct
eserte (2025-09-28 16:56:23+00:00): Ebenso hier die Frage: ist die Fahrradstraße tatsächlich fertig geworden?
Till_btn (2025-10-01 10:59:34+00:00): Montag früh vom Note aus nach Westen Bodenmarkierungen vorhanden, nach Osten noch nichts. Wird vermutlich im Laufe der Woche fertig
literan (2025-09-29 20:03:17+00:00): если тут и ставить эти чертовы covered, то уж на все дороги, дорожки и трамвайки надо под путепровводами
solenoid jam (2025-10-04 10:06:40+00:00): Наверно да. А почему чертовы?
literan (2025-10-04 10:49:01+00:00): ну не нравится мне. И так уже мост обозначен, два раза одну сущность обозначаем, получается. Но вики вроде допускает.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-09-28 17:22:51+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/981624692
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/981624716

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
kubahahaha (2025-09-29 13:33:43+00:00): Dzięki, nie pomyślałem o tagach operatora parkingu
carwos (2025-09-28 19:48:43+00:00): other discussion there https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172474860
InsertUser (2025-09-29 16:00:44+00:00): This seems to be a duplicate of: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/594022184

Is this the name that's actually on the sign?
CAM-Gerlach (2025-12-27 22:12:55+00:00): NB, they reverted your de-spamification and added back the blatant marketing copy in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172613073 which I reverted and further refined the tagging in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176506065 They are currently 0-day banned, though IMO given their repeated pattern of paid spam activity and lack of good faith a perma-ban would be more appropriate instead.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172577196
SirChasm (2025-09-28 17:30:05+00:00): There are signs on both ends of the crosswalk indicating the continuation of the bike route. It is not clear whether you are intended to dismount or not, however I don't think dismounting is expected.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-24 16:59:10+00:00): reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410  and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969  remain not answered

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173727584
nevw (2025-09-28 21:40:30+00:00): Hi, I have reverted your edits and both bus stops were correctly mapped before your changes.
aceman444 (2026-06-28 22:04:36+00:00): Zdravim, ako vyzera ta sprcha? To je naozaj oficialne na sprchovanie ludi?
Comino (2025-09-28 20:41:01+00:00): Hi,

In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes".

Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag !
Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead.

For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Merchants#tagging-guidance
and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bitcoin

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
https://btcmap.org/tagger/6794624
aTarom (2025-09-28 20:47:43+00:00): Not mine ;D
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2025-09-28 18:21:47+00:00): 你测你🐴呢😅
eggie (2025-09-28 18:51:42+00:00): Dag E... Lijkt me correct zo.
Groet
eggie
Glassman (2025-09-28 23:21:26+00:00): #TIP: It may be that the imagery is shifted. The imagery offset can be changed by selecting the background icon to modify the offset.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172579827
gebux (2025-09-29 07:44:13+00:00): Hi bentzy, 
the correct tagging for such an object is amenity=hunting_stand and in this case it has already been mapped for more than a year. 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11739171772

Those are private installations for local hunters and not a touristic attraction. I moved your picture to the point already in the map.
Corbeno (2025-09-28 18:54:19+00:00): meant to type comaps instead of osmand
eggie (2025-09-28 19:08:41+00:00): Dag Borewit,
Je zou ook alles op de adresnode kunnen bijtaggen bij club=scout. Daar staat de naam al op. 
Ik heb nu een clubhuistag bijgevoegd.

MVG
eggie
Borewit (2025-09-29 15:53:49+00:00): Dank eggie!
willkmis (2025-09-29 03:08:40+00:00): I was just here a couple days ago and the road was closed to traffic, can you clarify what prompted you to change this from hw=pedestrian to =unclassified?
Rukasu (2025-09-29 10:49:29+00:00): While gated, it's a two lane road that can be opened at any time by NPS and used for service and is frequented by other non motorized vehicles and bikes. Classifying it as a pedestrian street also inhibits is visibility and accessibility on other route planning apps (Strava, etc)
willkmis (2025-10-08 00:41:10+00:00): Most highway=pedestrian can be used by other modes and can fit motorized vehicles, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpedestrian for examples. Given that hw=pedestrian is used for this situation both elsewhere in Rock Creek Park (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/6061851) and on other similar roads that were made exclusive to pedestrians and bikes in other cities (e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/318476063 in New York and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27031304 in San Francisco), I really think this should be switched back to conform to the normal usage. 

Highway=pedestrian render plenty prominently in all the OSM-based apps and maps I use. Frankly, if a service isn't rendering/routing along these correctly, even with bicycle=designated, then it should be updated, rather than mistagging for the application.

(PS sorry for the delayed response, busy week for me non-OSM-wise)
zabop (2025-09-29 08:10:58+00:00): Please use meaningful changeset comments. "A" on its own does not seem to be meaningful. If I'm missing something, please enlighten me.
Jordi MF (2025-09-29 19:28:26+00:00): Hola Josepvc,

Según la wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dresidential), las áreas residenciales no deben nombrarse. Se recomienda usar la etiqueta "place=*" para añadir lugares con nombre. En este caso, ya existe esa información (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12395946328).

Ese es el motivo por el que eliminé el nombre. Ahora mismo, hay una redundancia de datos.

Saludos
Jordi MF (2025-09-29 19:36:57+00:00): Perdón, debería de haber escrito en este changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172627857

Aprovecho para decir que si lo que te preocupa es que no esté el nombre genérico "Mas". Tanto la AVL con la colaboración del Ayuntamiento de Moró como el Nomenclátor Geográfico de Municipios y Entidades de Población tienen recogido el lugar como "Correntilla". Podría añadirse "Mas de Correntilla" como alt_name.
aceman444 (2025-12-27 12:06:38+00:00): Hi, why are you adding motor_vehicle=designated tags on roads in Zilina? What is the purpose of that? Roads are designated for motor_vehicle, there is no need to tag it onto all roads, it is useless clutter. It is only useful to add tags where motor vehicles are forbidden or restricted on a road.

Tell us what did you want to achieve with this changeset and what "information was missing".
NeisBot (2025-09-28 19:57:40+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-09-29 11:08:32+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/172583196
user_5359 (2025-09-29 07:23:47+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/8681357744 more than 100 meters over streets and buildings. 
I moved the node back to the original position.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-09-28 20:11:14+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13178992062

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
aTarom (2025-09-29 08:01:53+00:00): Hola, los tags
> development=yes
> landuse=residential
> site_state=greenfield
en
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1433879226/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1433879227/history
¿Se podrían usar los estándar que figuran en esta wiki?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dgreenfield
Saludos
HaraldBk (2026-05-24 14:47:59+00:00): Hallo,
schön, dass du die Fahrradstraßen immer so schön einträgst!
Was ich im Fall der Sperberstraße nicht so richtig verstehe ist, warum dort (westlich der Pillenreuther Straße) vehicle=no eingetragen ist, was ist der Zweck?
pyram (2026-05-25 00:22:11+00:00): Ich bin mir jetzt nicht sicher, ob das ein Relikt aus der Zeit ist, als die Straße noch in Bau war, oder ob mir da JOSM einen Streich gespielt hat. Jedenfalls sollte das jetzt wahrscheinlich besser "motor_vehicle=yes" sein...
Ändere das gerne, weil der Umbau sicherlich abgeschlossen sein dürfte.
HaraldBk (2026-05-25 09:11:41+00:00): Nachdem ich selber eine Fahrradstraße eingetragen habe weiß ich glaube ich, warum das drinsteht: Das ist in dem "Radverkehrsanlagen kartieren" Artikel im Wiki so dokumentiert. Der Sinn erschließt sich mir trotzdem nicht, ich hab die Tags deshalb gelöscht.
HaraldBk (2026-05-25 12:47:15+00:00): Laut Langläufer doch kein Fehler, ich hab den alten Zustand deshalb wiederhergestellt. Aber beruhigt mich, dass du es auch für einen Fehler gehalten hast. :-)
pyram (2026-07-09 15:42:28+00:00): So - ich habe mir das noch einmal angeschaut.
Ja, das mit dem "vehicle=no" ist in der Tat kein Fehler im eigentlichen Sinn, aber dem Grunde nach überflüssig. Durch das bicycle=designated werden eigentlich bereits alle anderen Fahrzeuge ausgeschlossen und durch explizites motor_vehicle=yes teilweise wieder erlaubt. Genau das steht auch auf dem Verkehrsschild (und nichts anderes).
Das Weglassen ist aus meiner Sicht demnach auch kein Fehler ;-)
user_5359 (2025-09-29 07:11:12+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/2166395718 more than 100 meters over streets and buildings. 
I moved the node back to the original position.
eggie (2025-09-28 20:38:14+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback Ites is niet helemaal goed gegaan.
warnings:crossing_ways:building-highway 	2
warnings:crossing_ways:highway-highway 	2
Er lopen nu wegen dwars over de bebouwing en door een sloot.
Meestal is de oorzaak schuiven met de kaart in editmodus.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-09-28 20:44:29+00:00): Schade door weggetrokken wegen hersteld.
Groet
eggie
StC (2025-11-07 17:47:31+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre en prolongeant un chemin au-delà de sa connexion au chemin suivant dans la relation. Je m'occupe de la réparation.
Glassman (2025-10-02 01:55:32+00:00): I see you removed a drive way that goes to a house you added. If the features is visible then it can be mapped. I would have added service=driveway. 

The houses look great!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172585090
Glassman (2025-10-02 01:56:39+00:00): Instead of creating a new node and removing the old node, just update the tags. That preserves the history of the object.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172585482
brdrsrsu (2025-09-29 07:27:05+00:00): Hello, and thank you for this contribution! In the future, please make your changesets local (see Geographical size of changesets) and comments on changesets better representative of what has been changed. Kindly see the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

The way it is now, users from Croatia, Greece, Italy, Libya, Serbia, and a host of other countries see this changeset as if it were making changes in their country/ies. Thank you!
brdrsrsu (2025-09-29 17:44:41+00:00): Može li obrazloženje? Možda niste bili svesni, ali komentari na changeset trebaju da sadrže korisne informacije o izvršenim promenama. Možete pročitati detaljnije na: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset
ManuelB701 (2025-10-06 18:26:42+00:00): Nur so zu Info: Wenn eine Schule geschlossen aber dennoch klar erkennbar ist, gibt man dies nicht im Namen an, sondern fügt "disused:*" an das amenity=school (bzw. education=school wenn das auch hinzugefügt worden ist) ein, da man sonst in die Idee käme, dass dort tatsächlich eine Schule vorliegt (außerdem fällt das unter "beschreibende Namen", was auf OSM ebenfalls unerwünscht ist).
Taya_S (2025-10-09 12:27:22+00:00): Reverted fantasy edits

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173048479
sorcrosc (2025-10-05 10:48:32+00:00): Vorrei sapere il senso di questa nuova classificazione in cui le strade cambiano tipo a volte improvvisamente e senza continuità tra le arterie principali
Max Ciaone (2025-10-05 17:49:39+00:00): Ho solo riportato la classificazione della strada secondo il prg del comune, usando il mapping qui https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Italy/DBSN/Mapping (il webgis del prg comunale ha per le strade i campi che sono anche nel DBSN)
sorcrosc (2025-10-05 20:14:01+00:00): Quello schema non è certo una corrispondenza diretta con come etichettiamo le strade in osm e comunque non spiega perché molte strade sono passate da secondary a tertiary
dypa (2025-10-13 11:06:19+00:00): При указании размеченных не регулируемых пешеходных переходов нельзя использовать тег crossing=zebra, см https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:crossing=zebra

Пожалуйста при внесении следующих правок используйте теги (Размеченный (нерегулируемый) пешеходный переход)
crossing=uncontrolled
crossing:markings=zebra

Заранее спасибо!
Aleksandar Matejevic (2025-09-29 12:47:46+00:00): HI welzheimerwald,

Are you sure about this removal? The Wien relation is present at admin_level=4, admin_level=5 and now there is a "hole" within admin_level=6 which is strange. Can you recheck this deletion since here https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liste_der_Bezirke_und_Statutarst%C3%A4dte_in_%C3%96sterreich it says that Vienna is both a federal state and a political district and therefore also a municipality
welzheimerwald (2025-10-03 19:34:58+00:00): Vienna is also considered a municipality, so it could be mapped as admin_level=8. Do you see where this is going? This is redundant mapping: One identical geometry on several levels. You will also notice that some municipalities not belonging to a district (Statutarstadt) aren't mapped as admin_level=8 either. Therefore we should keep the data structure of OSM as simple as possible.
welzheimerwald (2025-10-03 19:52:08+00:00): I've created a thread in the Austrian OSM forum: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/doppel-mapping-von-geometrisch-identen-verwaltungsgrenzen-wien/136386
Sylabowy Kot (2025-09-28 22:07:46+00:00): KG SP podało publicznie nr budynku, który jest używany w GEZ. Zwracam uwagę, że w kompleksach wojskowych refy mogą być niespójne z ewidencjami zabytków, więc zapis w OSM oparty jest na tych informacjach. 

Straż Ochrony Państwa jest głównym uczestnikiem tutejszych zamówień publicznych, dodatkowo jest aktualną formacją po dawnych nadwiślańczykach (JW 2610), którzy użytkowali te koszary.
Sylabowy Kot (2025-09-28 22:20:06+00:00): Wolałem to skasować: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172586587
JakubS (2025-10-05 06:49:21+00:00): Dlaczego mapujesz pola uprawne jako osobne obszary landuse=farmland? Co to ma na celu? Za rok albo dwa układ się zmieni, kto to potem będzie aktualizował?
Do tego dochodzi przyklejanie obszarów do dróg, jak np. tutaj:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1138000903
Już nie mówiąc o tym, że w wielu przypadkach twoje obszary nakładają się na siebie lub zostawiasz między nimi dziury. Warto byłoby zrobić walidację danych, przed wysłaniem zestawy zmian. Usuwasz rzeczy, które były poprawne zastępując je swoją twórczością na zasadzie "byle szybko, byle więcej, byle jak".
rle32795 (2025-10-01 15:28:52+00:00): Haluan vaan sanoa, että (yleisesti) nämä ovat liityntäparkkeja jos on paikan päällä niin merkitty. Yleensä ei, joten ovat yleisiä.
jplahti (2025-10-01 15:57:15+00:00): Kävinkin juuri eilen paikalla katsomassa mikä merkki tänne on asennettu. Tavallinen "P" eli yleinen se on. Päivitän vastaamaan tilannetta maastossa.
user_5359 (2025-09-30 10:04:07+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1433909353. What is the mean of the tag yes = designated?
mstrbrid (2025-09-30 15:31:53+00:00): typo now fixed, thanks.
AndyB_66 (2025-09-29 14:46:43+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
AndyB_66 (2025-09-29 14:46:34+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
SomeoneElse (2025-11-01 02:37:35+00:00): Hello,
Was the change of highway=crossing to link on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2371177121/history deliberate?
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2025-11-01 02:38:52+00:00): Any idea what https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13179298428/history is?  It does not seem connected to anything.
rskedgell (2025-11-01 12:47:52+00:00): No, n2371177121 was unintentional, fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174060538
rskedgell (2025-11-01 12:50:15+00:00): The unconnected crossing node looks like a fat-fingered copy and paste error, removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174060650
SomeoneElse (2025-11-01 13:57:34+00:00): Thanks!
porfiriopaiz (2025-09-30 00:27:00+00:00): Hola EddyMoi56d74,

Te saluda Porfirio del equipo de OpenStreetMap de Nicaragua, gracias por tu contribución.

Me gustaría confirmar o validar la fuente de la información que has agregado en este conjunto de cambios.

¿Tienes algún enlace a la fuente de la información que nos puedas compartir?

Saludos.
Porfirio Páiz
EddyMoi56d74 (2025-10-12 13:22:35+00:00): Hola Porfiriopaiz 
Te comparto el enlace de la información 
https://www.managua.gob.ni/2022/12/09/familias-de-la-cuarta-etapa-del-barrio-hialeah-inauguran-proyecto-de-mejoramiento-vial/
Está información es 100% oficial aquí en mi país
porfiriopaiz (2025-10-12 17:16:55+00:00): Hola EddyMoi56d74.

Muchas gracias por tu respuesta.

Te comparto un enlace  a la wiki de OpenStreetMap que documenta el uso correcto de las etiquetas que has modificado:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:population

Este caso, el formato correcto debería ser el siguiente:

name=Hialeah 4
place=village
population=4503
population:date=2024
source:population=Alcaldía de Managua

Siempre recuerda tener en cuenta el correo uso de las etiquetas según el escenario y los valores que éstas etiquetas deben recibir.

En tu edición has agregado el número con coma (4,500) y las palabras habitantes así como el número de familias, tal información no se debe incluir. Únicamente un número y sin comas o puntos.

También es importante tener en cuenta la licencia de la fuente de información usada para agregar esa información; si bien es cierto has usado una fuente pública y oficial, no logré encontrar un permiso explicito de esta fuente que nos permita hacer usos de sus datos.

Siempre ten en cuenta que no se debe copiar información a OpenStreetMap desde otras fuentes sin tener un permiso explicito de esa fuente.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Licencia_Abierta_de_Base_de_Datos

Saludos, y feliz mapeo.

Porfirio Páiz
NeisBot (2025-09-29 00:06:43+00:00): Olá Jonas Barbosa silva, bem-vindo e obrigado pela sua contribuição!

Para facilitar a colaboração e ajudar os outros a entender as suas edições, é melhor adicionar uma breve descrição das alterações que fez. Comentários claros ajudam a comunidade a seguir o seu trabalho e fornecer feedback mais útil. Você pode encontrar dicas sobre como escrever bons comentários aqui[1].

Com base nas suas edições de mapa neste conjunto de alterações, eu preparei uma sugestão do que um comentário poderia parecer: "Modifiquei a estrutura da relação"
(Auto-translation)
---
Hi Jonas Barbosa silva, welcome and thanks for your contribution!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

Based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Modified relation structure"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
NeisBot (2025-09-29 00:15:35+00:00): Hi marianela calvo pacheco, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 78 building(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=172588347
NorthCrab_upload (2025-09-29 00:20:50+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1433933244

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
hook2k (2025-09-29 06:21:23+00:00): Dzięki za info. Adres został poprawiony zgodnie z wytycznymi.
NeisBot (2025-09-29 00:31:45+00:00): Hello bpk, welcome to OSM, and thank you for your contributions!

I've taken a look at your recent edits and wanted to discuss a few discrepancies I noticed regarding the surrounding environmental features. Specifically, the locations in your edits don't seem to align with the typical geographical characteristics expected in that area. Here are some (max 10) relevant links to the edits:
https://osm.org/node/13179418269

Could you please take a look?
Looking forward to your response.

#Somewhere
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=172588555