piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ivanbranco (2023-04-14 08:00:01+00:00): Ciao Balzj, benvenut su OSM

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/159949689

"Sentiero in disuso" è una descrizione, quindi non dovrebbe essere usato come name=*
il nome "La strà di vacch" era corretto? In tal caso andrebbe mantenuto anche se in disuso

buon mapping :)
Balzj (2023-04-14 09:53:40+00:00): Ciao Ivan, grazie dei consigli!

Il nome "La strà di vacch" non è riportato su alcuna segnaletica in realtà, anche perché la segnaletica non c'è. La scelta di chiamarlo "Sentiero in disuso" deriva dal fatto che sta venendo dismesso dell'Ente Parco ed è molto pericoloso. Dato che vedendo un nome normale qualcuno (come me) potrebbe essere spinto a percorrerlo e a rischiare la pelle, volevo indicare chiaramente la pericolosità (soprattutto per visibilità su app basate su OSM, come Outdooractive).
Vorrei imparare, al momento ho più in testa l'incolumità delle persone che le best practices di OSM :)
ivanbranco (2023-04-14 12:47:56+00:00): Questo viene chiamato "mappare per il rendering" (in questo caso Outdooractive, vedi anche: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Lying_to_the_renderer).

Se pensi che non prendano in considerazione tag importanti per la sicurezza delle persone puoi provare a contattarli a support@outdooractive.com
Balzj (2023-04-14 13:02:37+00:00): Chiarissimo, grazie!
Correggo
eggie (2023-04-11 17:03:59+00:00): Hi  Thank for your contribution. I merged your info with the present addressnode.
Greets,
eggie
osmviborg (2023-04-11 16:53:14+00:00): https://www.tesla.com/findus/location/supercharger/hjorringsupercharger
antonr (2023-04-11 17:09:07+00:00): Uklart for mig hvad du mener med det link...
Falsernet (2023-09-03 14:36:40+00:00): It's more accurate to map roads where they are physically divided, especially if there are features such as advanced stop lines, which you appear to have deleted.
tekim (2024-07-24 17:58:32+00:00): Trail numbers belong in the ref tag, not the name tag
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134781158
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-04-15 10:01:23+00:00): What is the number in the name field?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134781425
JAILTON OLIVEIRA CUNHA (2023-04-15 13:05:33+00:00): 2 houses in 1
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-04-15 18:11:19+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses
JAILTON OLIVEIRA CUNHA (2023-04-15 22:33:56+00:00): https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gringo
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-04-15 23:01:10+00:00): Referring to DWG
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-04-15 23:27:44+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Direcciones
SomeoneElse (2023-05-03 14:12:16+00:00): Hello JAILTON OLIVEIRA CUNHA,
Please don't insult people who are trying to help you.  We're all on the same side here, even if we speak different languages.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
SomeoneElse (2023-05-03 14:13:02+00:00): Olá JAILTON OLIVEIRA CUNHA,
Por favor, não insulte as pessoas que estão tentando ajudá-lo. Aqui estamos todos do mesmo lado, ainda que falemos línguas diferentes.
Atenciosamente,
Andy Townsend, em nome do Grupo de Trabalho de Dados da OSM.
fititnt (2023-05-15 22:20:57+00:00): @Spaghetti Monster por que você está fazendo spam de "#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA" nos changesets do JAILTON?

Ele está usando "name" em vez de "addr:housenumber" ? Sim. Mas fora isso (que depois alguém edita com JOSM e resolve), o JAILTON está fazendo um trabalho bem fantástico na cidade dele.

E outra, você, Spaghetti Monster ,  em vez de explicar para ele em uma língua que ele entenda (vide https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/L%C3%ADnguas_do_Brasil, ou seja, Português), você colou uma página da Wiki em Inglês. Na verdade, até mesmo para falantes e inglês, você deveria explicar, não apenas colar links. E mesmo depois de dizer que ia reportar para o DWG, você ainda postou outro link de wiki em... espanhol. No Brasil, fala-se português.

Com todo respeito, Spaghetti Monster , espero que você seja educado a comentar em changesets de pessoas de outros países. Não só o seu feedback de como resolver potenciais problemas é ruim, como qualquer coisa você vai chamar o DWG? Você literalmente tem um nome de usuário que parece uma piada/caricatura (o JAILTON tem até nome completo dele) e você parece agir como se fosse um troll, logo não tem como saber se você fez comentário sério ou não.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-05-16 01:32:03+00:00): Damn you can't even follow your own advice and call me out in my native language. Guess it's not that important. Wiki explains the tagging pretty well so I'm not sure why I have to be patronizing especially if they just resort to insults.
gscholz (2023-04-23 05:52:41+00:00): Hi lujazruizf55,
this changeset has created several errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines and duplicate nodes:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-57.40962&lat=-25.33425&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
trial (2025-12-18 21:41:54+00:00): Le Barracuda & SPA n'occupe pas tout le bâtiment, il y a aussi notamment un espace de travail partagé https://www.wojo.com/fr-FR/espaces-de-travail/wojo-brest-la-marina
Hufkratzer (2023-04-11 22:38:42+00:00): ¿Por qué usaste la etiqueta leisure=horse_riding en lugar de leisure=pitch en el campo de polo? Creo que esto está mal, ver
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:sport%3Dpolo
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:leisure%3Dhorse_riding
Carto'Cité (2023-08-16 14:47:14+00:00): Bonjour Yann,
Merci pour tes contributions sur les pistes cyclables le long de la Rue La Fayette. Je me permets quelques corrections que je te commente :
La manière dont tu les as décrites en fait deux pistes bidirectionnelles, une sur chaque trottoir, or, il me semble qu'il s'agit de pistes unidirectionnelles, il faut donc ajouter le one:bicycle=yes. Ces 2 pistes sont sur des trottoirs et sont partagées avec les piétons même si la peinture permet de préciser segregated=yes. Ces aménagements sont globalement assimilables à des trottoirs (même si c'est discutable) et on peut donc le préciser en les décrivant en highway=footway + footway=sidewalk + biscycle=designated. Enfin on peut également préciser la signalétique C113, pour bien affirmer qu'il s'agit bien d'une piste.
N’hésite pas à me contacter si tu as des remarques ou des questions. 🙂
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
Yann Lemaulf (2023-08-23 11:06:08+00:00): Bonjour Charles,

Merci pour ces remarques. Je viens de pousser les corrections que vous avez suggéré

Yann
Carto'Cité (2023-08-28 08:47:41+00:00): Bonjour Yann,
Merci pour ton retour. J'ai oublié de préciser que j'avais fait ces modifications. Si tu as la moindre remarque n'hésite pas 🙂
Charles
Gescriey (2023-04-11 18:46:48+00:00): Hello - some of the old l&l railroad that you've re-tagged as track road is totally overgrown/eroded and has no currently passable right of way.  Mostly, I'm referring to the area around the csx main line in tewksbury.  Also, the old l&l right of way north of that track is super narrow/single track and has no usage from motor vehicles.  I think path is a more accurate tagging.
Ktr101 (2023-04-11 19:36:19+00:00): I do not know if this is the way to go, but a lot of this had dual markers of abandoned railroad and the trail, virtually on top of the other. I was trying to consolidate and may have erred a few times, but much of that was tagged as a road. I had the LIDAR layer on when consolidating, so that did not help. Either way, it should be good now, so let me know if that needs any more updates.
Gescriey (2023-04-11 23:44:52+00:00): South of the freight main line, there's actually nothing there. No path, no nothing. The old l&l right of way is "gone".  If you were to try to follow it you'd just be bushwhacking through woods.  The tunnel under the freight line is filled in with landfill. It's probably best to leave that either as the abandoned railway or as nothing. The paths north of that I've surveyed with gps - I know the area quite well.  Cheers!
skyper (2023-04-13 20:35:37+00:00): Hi,
see also https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/134232663 and https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/tagless-points-and-lines-in-greenbelt-md.

Yet, again `building=Yes` (with capital Y). Additional `addr:city=UPPER MARLBORO` which should be `addr:city=Upper Marlboro`, I guess.

Many objects have been already corrected but as already said, please review all your changes of the last weeks to make sure nothing was missed.

Thanks and greetings
skyper
M-NCPPC_Import (2023-04-17 12:22:12+00:00): Thank you for the information. I will work on my uploading process, and address the issues. 

Thanks!
user_18841250 (2023-04-12 09:04:05+00:00): Reverted with changeset 134806147

Reverted revert changeset with no reason and no prior discussion

You also deleted addings I've made, like the suburbs Jura and Places, and I didn't delete anything, since I didn't remove name:fr and name:de tags.
If you allow me, I don't gift my time to OpenStreetMap only to see my edits reversed with no reason.
If you wanted you could have taken the time to simply restore the bilingual names on the nodes I changed, without deleting also all my other contributions.
eggie (2023-04-11 18:54:31+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
rab (2023-04-11 18:57:41+00:00): Esri currently has the most up to date imagery
SColchester (2023-04-12 06:59:54+00:00): Good to know, thanks rab - looks like there have been a lot of developments in this area since buildings were mapped 8 years ago
limes11 (2023-04-12 16:54:24+00:00): Wurde mitrevertiert, da es sonst nicht sauber gewesen wäre. Falls noch etwas Unbeteiligtes davon betroffen war, sorry!
canfe (2023-04-12 05:07:51+00:00): Il commento di cosa si mappa va sempre messo
wireguy (2023-04-12 12:45:50+00:00): peace, the wood relation is broken and may be duplicated, please investigate.
SomeoneElse (2023-04-11 19:06:46+00:00): Hello yannis323 and welcome to OpenStreetMap!  
Among the changes you've made here you've changed the capitalisation of https://osm.mapki.com/history/way/208731874 as you can see, that has been changed back and forth several times.  Those changes have been discussed over at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/odd-edits-in-italy/97706 , so I'd suggest that you join the discussion there to help people understand the changes.
Also, it'd be great if you could use changeset comments that are a bit more descriptive than "Migliorati tag e aggiunto informazioni" - that doesn't really explain what you actually did.
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2023-04-11 19:06:59+00:00): Ciao yannis323 e benvenuto su OpenStreetMap!
Tra le modifiche che hai apportato qui hai cambiato la maiuscola di https://osm.mapki.com/history/way/208731874 come puoi vedere, che è stata cambiata avanti e indietro diverse volte. Questi cambiamenti sono stati discussi su https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/odd-edits-in-italy/97706 , quindi ti suggerisco di unirti alla discussione lì per aiutare le persone a capire i cambiamenti.
Inoltre, sarebbe fantastico se potessi usare commenti al changeset che sono un po' più descrittivi di "Migliorati tag e informazioni aggiunte" - che non spiega realmente cosa hai effettivamente fatto.
Distinti saluti,
Andy
user_18919519 (2023-04-11 19:12:37+00:00): Among the changes you've made here you've changed the capitalisation of https://osm.mapki.com/history/way/208731874 as you can see, that has been changed back and forth several times.

What is the problem exactly?

Migliorati tag e aggiunto informazioni 
I'm sorry, but the changeset comment has a size limit, I can't describe everything I changed in detail, so I simply summarized to the best of my capacity the general contributions I've made. I can tell you I didn't touch any place outside Valsesia, so I don't know why the changeset seems to include also parts of Aosta Valley.
user_18919519 (2023-04-11 19:13:44+00:00): The culprit it's the way Monterosa Ski
SomeoneElse (2023-04-11 20:03:38+00:00): > What is the problem exactly?

I don't know that there is a problem - I'm just suggesting that you talk to the Italian community at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/odd-edits-in-italy/97706 to say that there isn't.
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2023-04-11 20:03:52+00:00): > Qual è esattamente il problema?

Non so se ci sia un problema - sto solo suggerendo di parlare con la comunità italiana su https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/odd-edits-in-italy/97706 per dire che non c'è 'T.
Distinti saluti,
Andy
user_5359 (2023-04-11 18:34:37+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please use nodes inside of the building to describe the vendors.
Kin Sapalot (2023-04-12 06:15:49+00:00): Hoi,
Let op - je bent een week te vroeg! 😉
plennert (2023-04-12 05:26:47+00:00): Hallo crosley-millan,
willkommen bei osm.

Kurze Frage, woher stammt die Änderung von Singen (Hohentwiel) auf Singen? Dies ist nicht korrekt.

Viele Grüsse
plennert
Stalker61 (2023-04-12 11:47:00+00:00): Привет. Весело тут у вас
literan (2023-04-13 06:01:46+00:00): привет, стараемся по мере сил
gscholz (2023-04-16 16:45:17+00:00): Hi PlayzinhoAgro-imports,
your recent activities have (again) created a huge amount of errors in the OSM database regarding duplicate nodes and self intersecting lines:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-38.51093&lat=-3.78611&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2023-04-18 07:23:39+00:00): Hi PlayzinhoAgro-imports,
your recent activities have (again) created a huge amount of errors in the OSM database regarding duplicate nodes and self intersecting lines:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-38.51093&lat=-3.78611&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
MxxCon (2023-04-14 00:25:27+00:00): How come revert this?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Metros#Station
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134784686
clay_c (2023-04-14 00:58:33+00:00): Because these are the outlines of underground excavated areas. All stations of the New York Subway are already mapped as nodes, and every time these outlines get retagged, it introduces duplicate stations.
gscholz (2023-04-18 07:24:46+00:00): Hi PlayzinhoAgro-imports,
your recent activities have (again) created a huge amount of errors in the OSM database regarding duplicate nodes and self intersecting lines:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-38.51093&lat=-3.78611&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
SomeoneElse (2023-04-12 09:53:15+00:00): Hello,
Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1161416279 really just a footway?  It looks like it has a horse route relation running across it https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1770168 .
Best Regards,
Andy
JasmineRanasinghe (2023-04-21 15:14:58+00:00): Hi,

You filled in the foot and bicycle tags here as designated however this is not a designated public bridleway. Therefore the path/cycleway should have permissive tags here.

Best wishes,
Jas
SomeoneElse (2023-04-21 16:07:52+00:00): Interestingly, looking at PRoW overlay data at https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#17/51.89484/-0.55593/H/P suggests that the council might think that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1161416279 actually is a public bridleway, although this doesn't mean that it's signed on the ground.  The overlay there is at https://osm.cycle.travel/rights_of_way by https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Richard from http://www.rowmaps.com/ .
JasmineRanasinghe (2023-04-24 10:08:59+00:00): It was https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/501435865 that I believe is not a public bridleway. Looking at the PRoW overlay data and http://www.rowmaps.com/showmap.php?place=LU6%202GY&map=OSM&lat=51.865255&lon=0.537482&lonew=W the is no bridleway in this part of Dunstable Downs and so the cycleway should not be tagged as such with designated access tags.
gscholz (2023-04-18 07:24:57+00:00): Hi PlayzinhoAgro-imports,
your recent activities have (again) created a huge amount of errors in the OSM database regarding duplicate nodes and self intersecting lines:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-38.51093&lat=-3.78611&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2023-04-18 07:25:50+00:00): Hi PlayzinhoAgro-imports,
your recent activities have (again) created a huge amount of errors in the OSM database regarding duplicate nodes and self intersecting lines:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-38.51093&lat=-3.78611&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
yasslay (2023-04-15 20:56:17+00:00): Hello,

I'm pretty sure that Manston Airport's runway, despite the imagery being deceiving, is not that wide. Additionally, Manston Airport is yet to reopen - something which is still uncertain as of right now. I'll be amending these additions in an upcoming changeset, which I'll link here.

Kind regards and happy mapping,
yasslay
yasslay (2023-04-15 21:02:35+00:00): Changeset in question: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/134955748
otishowell (2023-04-15 21:06:22+00:00): Hello,
Apologies for the size of the runway, the original line was not drawn by me and I didn’t check to see how accurate it was beforehand. Thanks for the update

Many thanks,
Otis
yasslay (2023-04-15 21:10:11+00:00): Hello,

I see. No problem then!

Kind regards and happy mapping,
yasslay
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-04-15 09:29:26+00:00): What is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1161436702 ?
gudensberger (2023-10-25 17:11:00+00:00): Hey, ist https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1161437289 wirklich eine Tram-Brücke?
gscholz (2023-04-18 07:25:24+00:00): Hi PlayzinhoAgro-imports,
your recent activities have (again) created a huge amount of errors in the OSM database regarding duplicate nodes and self intersecting lines:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-38.51093&lat=-3.78611&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2023-04-18 07:25:39+00:00): Hi PlayzinhoAgro-imports,
your recent activities have (again) created a huge amount of errors in the OSM database regarding duplicate nodes and self intersecting lines:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-38.51093&lat=-3.78611&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
martinst (2023-04-12 08:28:12+00:00): motor_vehicle=forestry ist die richtige Schreibweise
Schwarzstart (2023-04-12 08:57:29+00:00): Danke!
jb54osm (2023-04-11 18:48:23+00:00): Dag Lightning Checkout,

Bedrijven aan huis nemen we in OpenStreetMap NL niet op.

We do not include home businesses in OpenStreetMap NL.
Lightning Checkout (2023-04-11 18:59:42+00:00): Ok, daar was ik me niet van bewust. Zal er de volgende keer rekening mee houden. Deze moet dan verwijderd worden?
jb54osm (2023-04-11 19:10:10+00:00): Inderdaad. Bedankt voor de medewerking.
user_12531033 (2023-04-13 06:37:59+00:00): 交分道岔不要画成这样，请直接在交叉处的那个点标注上railway=switch以及railway:switch=double_slip。
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134785804
冰觞沐雨 (2023-04-13 15:56:11+00:00): 你的意思是交分叉直接与轨道相交，并在相交处标railway=switch和railway:switch=double_slip就可以嘛？那railway:turnout_side=* 怎么标注呢？
user_12531033 (2023-04-13 15:58:15+00:00): 你看北京站就行了，复式交分道岔不标注turnout_side。
user_12531033 (2023-04-13 15:58:38+00:00): 普通的单开道岔可以不写railway:switch=default
Alexia Schoonjans (2023-04-22 12:55:49+00:00): Pouvez-vous regarder à nouveau : on dirait que vous avez ajouté deux bâtiments l'un sur l'autre, avec des tags non reconnus par le système. Ça rend la carte assez bizarre à cet endroit. Je crois que vous avez ajouté le « patro » en double, choisissez l'un des deux et enlevez-le.
os-emmer (2024-03-01 17:33:10+00:00): Hello CENTSOARER,
you added an object with emergency=ses_station. This tag is deprecated. Is emergency=disaster_response a fitting replacement?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/94927879

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:emergency%3Ddisaster_response
CENTSOARER (2024-03-06 22:09:06+00:00): You linked to a changeset that is not mine. Moreover, I don't think I've ever mapped in Oceania. This changeset, though, is mine, and it seems to have the mentioned keytag. I'm fixing it right now. Thanks for the heads-up.
os-emmer (2024-03-07 17:52:13+00:00): I think I copied the wrong link, sorry. But thanks a lot for fixing that anyways. :)
NorthCrab_upload (2023-04-11 18:40:28+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10802548374
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/129130158

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
gscscnd (2023-04-12 07:28:38+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/placement
Poprawione w
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/134802622
pitfire (2023-04-12 13:07:22+00:00): Hallo  florian,

Betr.: Weg 317161751, v6
ein "noexit" ist kein Eintrag auf einer Linie, sondern ausschließlich auf Knoten. "Endnode" und auch nur, wenn es dort für niemand weiter geht. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:noexit?uselang=de
NorthCrab_upload (2023-04-11 19:00:21+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o miejscowości. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, zastosuj kombinację addr:city + addr:street. Jeśli nie, przekaż nazwę miejscowości w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1035164560

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
habi (2023-04-12 20:51:29+00:00): Ciao marckap

Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap!
Schön machst du hier mit und hilfst, die Karte und die Kartendaten zu pflegen.

E Gruess us Bärn,
habi
Jakka (2023-04-12 08:06:30+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/420071913
C'est plus qu 'un building ?
Druzzy (2023-04-11 19:30:21+00:00): Mi ha tagliato il commento... allora quella parte (ponte e strada) è stata spazzata via dalla piena e stando ai lavori attuali, per come son fatti, non verrà ripristinata.
OneC (2023-04-13 21:43:22+00:00): Hi GeorgeS - do you have GPS data for the Snowmobile Trail (75) that takes the path up to Derbyshire Rd?
If so, I'd like to obtain and add it to OSM. (an if you have GPS data for the east side of Lawson Lake Rd, that would great too.
Thanks,
OneC
George S (2023-04-13 22:24:19+00:00): No, I only walked it a short distance before turning around.
trigpoint (2023-07-12 08:51:39+00:00): Hi
When you surveyed this pub you missed the most important payment tag which is where it differs from most pubs, payment:cash=no. 

Cheers Phil