piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Leo Slager (2024-05-02 22:46:04+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Leo Slager (2024-05-02 22:47:45+00:00): Dag ChrFer,

Je hebt hier een nieuwe weg over de oude weg heen geplakt. Dat is natuurlijk niet de bedoeling.
De oude weg was al voorzien van oneway=no.
ik herstel de juiste weg.
ChrFer (2024-05-03 05:34:51+00:00): Hoi Leo,

Bedankt voor dit bericht en je privebericht.

Het stukje straat tussen Gele Lis 156 en Gele Lis 172 is ook tweerichtingsverkeer of oneway=no.  Als ik de huidige situatie op de kaart bekijk is dit niet juist want het is onewy=yes. Volgens mij was dit gisteren ook zo. 

Dit heb ik aan willen passen
Ik was in de veronderstelling dat ik de Gele Lis op het kruispunt nabij Gele Lis 156 in twee stukjes heb geknipt. Vervolgens heb ik voor het stukje tussen Gele Lis 156 en Gele Lis 172 de eigenschap oneway op no gezet.

Tussen Gele Lis 156 en Gele Lis 172 is al ruim 8 jaar geen eenrichtingsverkeer meer. Dit wilde ik aanpassen. Navigatiesystemen laten de mensen daardoor steeds omrijden. Dat is vervelend.

Zou jij dit a.j.b. voor me recht willen zetten? Of zal ik het nog een keer proberen?

Groet,
Christian
Leo Slager (2024-05-03 06:41:13+00:00): Dag Christian,

Dat stukje van de Gele Lis staat sinds 5 februari als oneway=no op de kaart.
De kaart is dus al correct.

Wellicht zou je dit ook nog kunnen melden op Google Maps. Daar staat het verkeerd.
Mensen die een navigatie gebruiken die is gebaseerd op GoogleMaps zullen dus omrijden.
ChrFer (2024-05-03 07:53:00+00:00): Dag Leo,

Ik zie nu inderdaad dat dit stukje als oneway=no op de kaart staat.

Een paar minuten geleden was (buiten de edit-mode) in de Standard Map Layer nog steeds een pijltje op dit stukje straat te zien. Dit is inmiddels verdwenen.

Als ik net gebruik heb gemaakt van de routeplanner binnen OpenstreetMap zou ik volgens de geplande route nog om moeten rijden. Daar zit kennelijk een vertraging in...?!

Bij Google Maps heb ik inderdaad al een melding gemaakt. Maar dit ook al een paar keer. Maar tot nu toe werd mijn melding helaas afgewezen.

Ik heb deze week ook eens navraag gedaan bij de gemeente Den Haag. Ik neem aan dat Google Maps toegang heeft tot gegevens van de overheid. Een medewerker heeft me vervolgens laten weten dat hij in het Nationaal Wegenbestand (NWB) een desbetreffende correctie heeft gedaan.

Ik hoop dat het nu allemaal goed zal komen... :-)

Groet,
Christian
Leo Slager (2024-05-03 18:59:07+00:00): Het duurt wel even voor alle tiles op alle zoom-niveaus zijn bijgewerkt met de laatste data.
Je kunt dat versnellen door de cache van je computer te legen.  Met CTRL-F5 (eventueel meerdere malen herhalen) worden dan de actuele data uit de database geladen.
Routers halen soms maar 1x per week of per maand de laatste data binnen.
Met ingebouwde routers kun je dus het beste op maandag controleren of de juiste route wordt getoond.
citrula (2024-05-03 05:42:32+00:00): Looks good to me.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150812180
citrula (2024-05-03 05:40:01+00:00): this change looks good to me. Thanks for your contribution, and welcome to OSM!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150812263
citrula (2024-05-03 05:37:58+00:00): Welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contributions. I have removed the beaches you added in this changeset and others - in OSM, natural=beach has a fairly narrow definition which you can read about on the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dbeach

Sadly, this means that they will occur less often than pokemon go players might like. Let me know if you have any questions.
hoserab (2024-05-03 17:11:12+00:00): The changes you've made to the Deer Valley Mall are out-of-date.

This building outline is incorrect: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/335988865 
You've enveloped an entirely separate Co-op grocery store, having changed it from building=yes to building:part=yes. (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/335988864/) 
This interior corridor linking the Co-op to the mall building is entirely fictitious: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1279199180 
This Co-op store used to be connected to the mall building, but was separated TWELVE YEARS AGO.
This footpath around the back is fictitious: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1279199162 
This Walmart was closed, it doesn't exist anymore: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1279199155

In Sunalta, you've added this park: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1279199120 There's ALREADY a park there, you added a park perfectly coincident over top of it.


*sigh*...
YomanNH (2025-08-28 14:04:54+00:00): Hej, opis powinien być w description, a nie w name. Z pewnością te drogi nie mają takiej nazwy, jak to stworzyłeś.
David Kříž (2026-07-17 14:23:37+00:00): why did you delete all the former narrow gauge railway path between Kicevo and Ohrid/Struga? ?
citrula (2024-05-03 05:41:24+00:00): addr:unit tag drops things like "Suite", "Ste", "Unit", "#", etc... by convention - you can just include the unit identifier without that sort of prefix. Other than that, these changes look good.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150812841
DD1GJ (2024-05-02 22:35:09+00:00): Hallo stritti275, willkommen bei OpenStreetMap und Danke fürs Mitmachen. Da die Neuapostolische Kirche bereits als Flächeneintrag (Way) vorhanden war, habe ich diesen Neueintrag wieder gelöscht. Weitere Tipps und Erklärungen findest Du z.B. im Tutorial:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/451255099/history

Viele Grüße, Joachim
stritti275 (2024-05-03 06:08:55+00:00): Hallo Joachim,
da hatte ich wohl nicht richtig geschaut. Bei mir hatte es die Daten nicht angezeigt. 

Danke, Stephan
d3mol3k (2024-05-04 20:43:29+00:00): Na jakiej podstawie zmiana kategorii drogi?
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-05 17:58:19+00:00): edycja wycofana w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150932368

dodatkowo, zmiana kategorii dróg na dużą zmianę wymaga konsultacji ze społecznością a nie założenia nowego konta
szydzio (2024-05-04 08:30:00+00:00): Cześć!
Zwróć proszę uwagę na poprawny opis swoich zestawów zmian=> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Good_changeset_comments
Sama kropka to nie jest dobry komentarz...
Pozdro!
maraf24 (2024-05-04 21:41:49+00:00): I teraz nie wiadomo, czy ten przystanek jest w budowie, czy już działa - otagowane są oba stany.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-05 17:51:39+00:00): https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Szczecin_%C5%81asztownia  wszystko wskazuje na to że nie

zresztą to konto tego gościa ewidentnie jest multikontem
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-05 17:55:07+00:00): wycofane w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150932359
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-05 17:55:15+00:00): wycofane w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150932352
maraf24 (2024-05-04 21:45:40+00:00): Z jakiego to powodu https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27437606 miałoby być tertiary a nie residential? Ja nie widzę.
grelus (2024-05-05 11:30:18+00:00): to samo z Felczaka, przynajmniej na jednokierunkowym odcinku między JPII a Wąską
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-05 17:55:23+00:00): wycofane w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150932345
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-22 16:56:54+00:00): Hello!

You used
direction=forward;5
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4656009936/history

Have you maybe meant
direction=forward
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?
beatpoet (2024-05-22 17:04:26+00:00): Hello, that would've been deliberate, to limit the speed table's directions-affected to north and south on Rainbird Road. Selecting "forward" only affects northbound on RR and "backward" affects southbound on RR and eastbound on Milton Close.
beatpoet (2024-05-22 18:21:55+00:00): Newland Avenue, not Rainbird Road!
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-31 08:53:05+00:00): What direction=5 is supposed to mean then?
beatpoet (2024-05-31 10:35:54+00:00): 5 degrees, to manually point the "direction affected" that way.
felipeeugenio (2024-05-03 23:10:00+00:00): Hola, por favor cuidado con las ediciones. Duplicó varios pasos y los dejpo desconectados de las vías. Hoy reparé todo.
Gracias
Tezcan KALAYCI (2024-05-03 15:14:06+00:00): Konumum aktif olmadı nasıl aktif olur?
YomanNH (2024-05-07 06:30:12+00:00): Cześć,
ciągi pieszo-rowerowe to highway=path, a nie highway=footway.
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-11 12:27:06+00:00): Thank you for mapping. The mapping looks great and also the changeset comment. Happy Mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150814049
MxxCon (2024-05-03 22:18:28+00:00): Routes, like most other things in OSM should be listed with ; not ,
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150814069
MxxCon (2024-05-03 22:20:57+00:00): Also you can use https://relatify.monicz.dev/ to simplify addition of bus stops and ways to routes.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150814069
Violaine_Do (2024-11-30 01:29:42+00:00): Hi PerpetualHiker, could you please replace the buildings and piers where they were at the first place? It comes from quality data (French polynesia government). Thks for you understanding.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150814189
Violaine_Do (2024-11-30 01:30:33+00:00): Hi PerpetualHiker. That would be very nice if you could replace piers and buildings where they were at the first place. It comes from quality data (french polynesia government). Thks for you understanding.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150814189
PerpetualHiker (2024-12-03 22:48:15+00:00): Hello Violane_Do, I aligned the buildings and piers in this area to an offset listed in my sources: Esri World Imagery (1.70; -6.60); Strava. Our team uses geo-referenced Strava/GPS traces to align features, as discussed by my colleague Lars_TheViking. Thanks!
Violaine_Do (2024-12-04 00:09:19+00:00): Hi, Thanks for your answer. 
Just a quick info I never tried yet the strava heatmap so this is interesting. But still I didnt mean that this should be the reference, but should be taken into account rather. In some case it might be ok in others no. 
So in this specific area I find (-3.73, -1.83) with esri clarified and (1.13, -3.39) with Bing.  And if I use buildings it is (2.38, -1.68) with Bing and (-5.12, -2.96) with ESri clarified. I reckon the buildings are not clean in this area.  So we still have a 3m diff. I would agree to take (1.13, -3.39) with Bing. Also I think generally Bing is more up to date than Esri. (i know because of some new buildings appear on Bing and not Esri). Would you agree?
PerpetualHiker (2024-12-04 21:57:46+00:00): Hi Violaine_Do, I agree that Bing aerial imagery (1.13; -3.39) is well aligned in this area. I can align the piers and buildings here to that.

Best,
PerpetualHiker
Violaine_Do (2024-12-04 22:06:47+00:00): Thanks, it would be much appreciated!
Enock4seth (2024-05-04 21:36:25+00:00): Welcome to OSM and thanks for mapping. Where possible reuse existing features instead of deleting them completely and re-drawing them.

Using only "#YouthMappers" as the only word in the changeset comment is not helpful to other mappers and yourself. Kindly use a short and more useful text, eg. "added buildings" in addition to your hashtags.

Happy mapping!
rowcherryrow (2024-05-03 17:53:14+00:00): Correction: Source used was Bing aerial imagery (4.10; -8.23); Strava; Mapillary.
GovernorKeagan (2024-05-21 22:41:03+00:00): Hi! Just seen that you reverted my change. There is still road works happening here both on the road and footpath, did I tag it incorrectly?
gogorm (2024-05-22 08:08:11+00:00): Hey, sorry for not contacting you about this. I assumed the road is still open to two-way traffic as I saw some housing estates that are only reachable via that road. Is the road completely blocked?
GovernorKeagan (2024-05-22 08:17:38+00:00): No bother!

There is only one lane open with the traffic being managed (alternating the direction of flow) by the workers.
gogorm (2024-05-22 08:43:30+00:00): Ok, in that case I wouldn't tag as highway=construction because navigation software will treat the road as closed and  unusable. You could map the affected road as being one-way alternating, and map a separate footpath with highway=construction. However you should consider how long the works are going to last. I read somewhere that road works that will last less than 3 months should not be mapped, and started doing same. I don't think there's a hard rule around this, but the main factor for me is that some navigation apps might not update their OSM data for months, which can have the effect of the app avoiding a road that has since re-opened. In this case since its basically a layout change and not a closure, there will probably be little/no impact on routing choices for navigation apps so it's probably OK to map it here IMO.
GovernorKeagan (2024-05-22 14:12:20+00:00): Perfect, thanks for the clarification!
mueschel (2024-05-03 17:29:25+00:00): Hi,
please check this power plant and its tags - most of them are not used in OSM.

Here's a good starting point to look for proper tags:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:power%3Dplant
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-04 13:33:46+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11875228210/history has shop = workshop that was added in this edit
shop=workshop ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop or https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Tag_descriptions_for_key_%22shop%22 fitting? Maybe new value needs to be invented? Maybe this data is wrong and there is no shop here? Maybe it is not a shop but something else?
MxxCon (2024-05-03 23:12:56+00:00): Hello.
Do you have some more information about this monument?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150815162
soltosirius (2024-05-17 16:04:08+00:00): This is the location of a plaque; I'm not sure monument is the correct tag but it was the best thing I could find in my mapping application.

Here's a brief summary: https://untappedcities.com/2021/10/27/trees-inwood-hill-park/7/
citrula (2024-05-03 05:35:18+00:00): Welcome to OSM!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150815185
tekim (2024-05-03 13:56:59+00:00): removing fake beach

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150839305
android5027 (2024-05-03 14:13:51+00:00): There is a small beach made of pebbles on the bank of Deener Creek. It is real. It's a place where people access the creek for recreation, though informally.

What is the appropriate tag, if natural=beach is inaccurate?
tekim (2024-05-03 17:33:26+00:00): natural=shingle is probably better, although if you really want it to be a beach, that probably would work too.  I don't really think of a small area of pebbles next to a small stream as a beach, and the wiki seems to agree.  My main concern was whether this was real. We have been having some problems with people adding fake beaches as Pokemon Go now uses that feature for something that matters to those who play that game.  Thanks for your understanding
android5027 (2024-05-03 18:19:04+00:00): Understood. Thank you for your diligence in removing vandalism!
mueschel (2024-05-04 08:34:05+00:00): Hi,
there's a problem with the way you edited data here:

I guess you downloaded a geojson file, loaded it in JOSM and edited & uploaded it again?

This doesn't work, because JOSM can't edit the original object (it's missing the id of it). Instead it creates new duplicate objects.

E.g. this POI:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11875307690
is a duplicate of the older
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4672118481

Right now there are about 1200 duplicated POI that need to be reverted:

http://overpass-turbo.eu/?R&Q=%5Bout%3Ajson%5D%3B%28node%5B%22%40timestamp%22%5D%3Bway%5B%22%40timestamp%22%5D%3B%3E%3Brel%5B%22%40timestamp%22%5D%3B%29%3Bout%20meta%3B

Please let me know if you need help with that!

Jan
scuzzmonkey (2024-05-04 20:02:45+00:00): Ah, shit.

You're spot in with the attempted method. 

I'm away from my laptop this weekend, but am happy to fix. However, I've not sure how, so any guidance would be greatly appreciated.

Ty.
mueschel (2024-05-05 09:01:16+00:00): You're not the first one doing this :-)

There's no simple way to merge the copies of the objects again.
For now I reverted your two changesets in 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150910146

Whenever you have time to add the information to the proper objects, you need to load them directly from the API, e.g. in overpass-turbo using "Export to JOSM" or by directly entering the query into the download dialog in JOSM.

You can also access your now deleted data by using the reverter plugin in JOSM to load the points from my changeset into a separate layer in JOSM (without uploading, obviously).
scuzzmonkey (2024-05-05 09:41:51+00:00): Tysm, really appreciate it. I'll have a look and attempt with 1 item next time. Would it be OK for you me to message you with that for review at that time? Cheers.
felipeeugenio (2024-05-03 12:57:51+00:00): Hola
Con la letra Q puedes cuadrar las casas, para que te queden con ángulos rectos. Según recuerdo ID tiene además la habilidad de detectar diagonales con la misma letra.

Si haces dos o más casas pegadas casas, puedes seleccionarlas ambas y cuadrarlas igual. Así no te quedan esos ángulos extraños.

Además, tengo la impresión de que a veces te dejas llevar por la forma del techo. Sabemos que es dificil no hacerlo, pero en OSM se mapea la estructura, no el techo. Entonces cuando veas un ángulo que denote una diagonal, pero sepas que debajo hay un rectángulo, se mapea el rectángulo.
tekim (2024-05-03 14:06:08+00:00): Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap!  Thanks for your edits to the map.  I see you have added some beaches (natural=beach) in this and some of your other changesets.  Can you explain why you feel these are beaches?
JeffQueen (2024-05-03 14:32:30+00:00): I guess I should’ve sought out what the definition of a beach was before I added them. I saw that most of these locations had a Sandy looking waterline so I assumed beach would be the right thing correct, I will delete them.  I am still learning and  if I did something wrong I am sorry.
JeffQueen (2024-05-03 14:33:13+00:00): Also, any pointers for a newbie would be much appreciated. Thank you.
JeffQueen (2024-05-04 12:33:43+00:00): Somebody sent me the wiki link that has Definitions. So if I do find an area that meets that criteria do I put that in the notes that has these qualities? Just trying to find out for the future example I might turn in would be this is this correct?  “This is a landform along a body of water which consists of sand, shingle or other loose material”
tekim (2024-05-04 14:17:55+00:00): Thanks for your replies, and sorry for my delayed response.  The main problem with the "beaches" you were adding is that they were not loose sand, gravel, pebbles, stones or shells based on available imagery. Further, natural=beach is for areas along the coast where wave action has shaped the landscape.   While this also sometimes happens along large rivers or next to large inland bodies of water, it probably doesn't occur next to small ponds or streams unless someone (if someone has hauled in some sand for the purpose of creating a beach it might qualify too if it mimics what would be found along the sea coast).

We have been having a rash of map vandalism related to people creating fake beaches, so I would expect any new beaches added would be scrutinized.  Best to start with mapping other features.

There is no need, and it would be no help, to insert a link to the wiki page. 

Regarding advice, the best place to start mapping is near where you live.  Get out and observe the world first hand and map what you find. You can then cite "survey" as your source.

Happy mapping!
JeffQueen (2024-05-05 14:49:11+00:00): Thank you
I will make sure I use better judgement in the future
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-07 14:26:58+00:00): Partly reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150819957
jtracey (2024-05-03 01:29:42+00:00): nit: I should have cited Esri World Imagery for this edit as well (Bing doesn't have the newer inner buildings)
AntBurnett (2024-12-05 21:33:50+00:00): Hi donmac703! There's a bit of discussion (started by me) over at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/dam-or-embankment/122526/10 that I'd be keen to hear your opinion?
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-06 03:29:16+00:00): Thank you for mapping. It would be great if you provide a changeset comment for the mass deletion you have done. Happy mapping.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150816667
Ewrt1 (2024-05-03 05:28:42+00:00): It is not "Cineplex Odeon Cinemas Varsity and VIP", it was probably rebranded. I along with others think this is based on old info.
Minh Nguyen (2024-05-25 23:45:53+00:00): Hi, “Donald H. Rolf Circle Freeway” was already tagged as an official_name. It shouldn’t be the primary name because, unlike other monikers like “Cincinnati Bypass”, the official name isn’t signposted anywhere. Similarly, changeset 150817099 should be undone: even though “Staff Sergeant Matt Maupin Veterans Memorial Highway” is posted in one or two places, this is a memorial designation, not intended for wayfinding.
Minh Nguyen (2024-05-25 23:47:45+00:00): Also, please consider making your changeset comments more descriptive. You don’t really need to say where you made changes – that’s already obvious from the changeset’s bounding box. Instead, try to say *what* you modified, and why you modified it (if relevant).
eggie (2024-05-03 05:44:50+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-05-03 05:49:50+00:00): Wanneer je een aansluiting van een fietspad verplaatst en je laat bicycle=use_sidepath staan op de hoofdrijbaan zal het allemaal niet meet routeren voor fietsers.
Ik pas wat aan op de Leidekkersdreef.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-05-03 06:00:14+00:00): Leidekkersdreef gesplitst en bicycle=use_sidepath verwijderd tot het fietspad.
Het zal anders niet routeren. 
MVG
eggie
goedegazelle (2024-05-03 10:32:49+00:00): ssandermann,
De belangrijkste eigenschap van een pad of weg is wie er mag komen. Als je een "highway=path" omzet naar een "highway=cycleway" dan sluit je daarmee het pad af voor brommers en scooters. Dat is de reden waarom deze paden als "path" waren aangemerkt en niet als "cycleway". Als algemene regel kun je stellen dat een pad zonder fietsbord geen fietspad is maar gewoon een pad, ongeacht de ligging of de kleur van het asfalt.

Het is niet zo dat de gemeente is vergeten om hier fietsborden te plaatsen. Er is bewust voor gezorgd dat brommers en scooters door kunnen rijden naar Dorpersveld.
eggie (2024-05-03 11:01:26+00:00): Hoi goedegazelle en ssandermann

In dit geval heb ik het bewust zo gelaten op grond van Ducktagging. Fietsers zouden anders uitkomen op de Laan van Kuipershof en die staat op bicycle=use_sidepath

MVG
eggie