piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ftrebien (2026-07-28 17:20:41+00:00): Vandalismo. O comentário sugere uma ação antivandalismo, mas é o contrário. O mapeamento dos limites de velocidade estava correto antes em quase todas as vias editadas. Segundo o Código de Trânsito Brasileiro, o limite de velocidade em vias locais (residenciais e unclassified) é 30 km/h quando não têm sinalização, e as vias locais editadas não possuem sinalização indicando a velocidade.
Educador Maps (2026-07-28 23:08:25+00:00): Ah ta, Desculpe!
ftrebien (2026-07-28 23:16:23+00:00): Você pretende corrigir?
Kovoschiz (2026-07-29 17:53:59+00:00): You misunderstood it. Shouldn't delete and transfer. They are different.
okwithmydecay (2026-07-28 19:51:45+00:00): Well done for adding those addresses so quickly after I added the buildings!
Frans S (2026-07-31 12:00:57+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped them. 
A remark
Some buildings don't look square, but probably they are rectangular. They can look distorted depending on  the angle of the satellite imagery. Building with https://drive.google.com/file/d/1h7wr9hQ6U2Zuymlw14r1gWXAmZ1rwbDO/view?usp=sharing

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks that might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards, and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186528952
ftrebien (2026-07-28 17:30:13+00:00): Vandalismo. Estava correto antes. Há placas indicando que o limite é de 50 km/h, não 40 km/h.
Educador Maps (2026-07-28 19:51:54+00:00): Me desculpe! Hoje em dia nesse trecho tem algumas placas indicando sim, 40km/h
ftrebien (2026-07-28 22:05:54+00:00): A placa de 50 km/h ainda estava lá 6 meses atrás, conforme prova este vídeo logo no começo: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lYjnVhuAV14
kubahahaha (2026-07-30 10:16:04+00:00): Cześć!

W polu name powinna znajdować się tylko nazwa sklepu.
Nie ma potrzeby wpisywać w polu description takiego opisu, lepiej żeby zostało puste.

Poprawiłem to miejsce
goral605 (2026-07-30 10:22:28+00:00): Dziękuję
frydzio (2026-07-29 07:52:26+00:00): Hej,
Drobne uwagi:
1. Prawdopodobnie przez przypadek (ID czasami tak ma) zamieniłeś niepotrzebnie prosty landuse na relację multipolygon (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/21157544)
2. `tunnel=building_passage` powinien mieć punkty wspólne z budynkiem (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1545444481)
3. Przesunąłeś wjazd do garażu podziemnego w budynku Antoniewska 6E chociaż wg strony inwestycji jak i warstwy BDOT (czyli po odbiorach geodezyjnych) powinien być w poprzednim miejscu https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14039012631
4. Możesz popracować nad liniami prostymi (w ID skrót to S, JOSM - L) i kątami prostymi (w ID i JOSM - Q)
shrimp crevette (2026-07-28 16:37:02+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5421451
eerib (2026-07-28 16:41:46+00:00): Discussion in

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186424970
IpswichEdits (2026-07-29 08:36:12+00:00): Thank you so much for doing this. It was on my to do list but never got round to it. 😂
IpswichEdits (2026-07-29 08:39:51+00:00): (I had already split the huge residential landuse in Ipswich into smaller parts, and started working on smaller sections individually, but never got round to unglueing the rest, so thanks for doing this and the other nearby changeset)
Frans S (2026-07-29 10:52:11+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please connect highways to eachother where possible.
Check the instructions :
Connect roads to roads. Always connect roads to other roads where they meet and never end roads on land use or other area edges.
LochnagarMountain (2026-07-30 09:56:32+00:00): Hello Fran S. I reclassified some of the ways but was not the one that originally created them. I see that you’ve connected the roads together. Thank you for your input and happy mapping!
Vektor_567 (2026-07-28 17:26:12+00:00): dort verläuft keine tertiary-straße
Wildsharky (2026-07-30 08:52:33+00:00): Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186630472
Jesper Dall (2026-07-28 17:18:38+00:00): I talked to owner at Hannesborgvej (NE point of old road) who told me the road had been removed many years ago
Kovoschiz (2026-07-29 17:56:58+00:00): `=civic` is for public enjoyment. This is `=industrial` + `telecom=data_center`
dieterdreist (2026-07-29 09:44:39+00:00): vandalism
Fizzie-DWG (2026-07-31 05:28:16+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21037
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-28 18:57:37+00:00): Looks good to me, thanks @O1S! You correctly identified that ESRI imagery was more orthorectified and used it to align Starbucks appropriately, and then added an appropriately tagged and aligned drive-through way.

Only thing you should add is oneway=yes on the drive through way (it is already going the correct direction) since traffic can only proceed one way through the drivethrough. Thanks!
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-29 17:00:59+00:00): Oneway added and geometry refined in changeset 186597211

https://osm.org/changeset/186597211
Frans S (2026-07-29 09:20:37+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she deliver high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (See attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
Issues found on your mappings
C: Collected adjacent buildings and mapped it as 1 building.

D: Connecting nodes to other features.

E: Buildings not squared or rounded. It is impossible to draw correct square buildings by hand. Use th ctrl Q command.



Explanation can be found in this document, which might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards, and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186532695
Frans S (2026-07-29 09:21:25+00:00): Not a single building has been squared.
Quality prevails above quantity !!!
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186532695
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-29 17:13:52+00:00): A few things still needed work here:

- Two duplicate ways existing as service=drive-through far from the actual drive-through, one of them not matching the physical layout of the lot
- If the way serves as more than just a drive-through, it either shouldn't be tagged drive-through or two separate ways should be added, one for the drive through and one for other traffic (as they are generally separated by at least painted markings, this is one of the few exceptions to the physically separated ways rule on OSM)
- Missing oneway=yes

I fixed all this, cleaned up the geometry and also added the missing parking lot ways and refined their classification in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/186598046
O1S (2026-07-31 22:56:00+00:00): They actually redid the parking lot. Check https://osmus.slack.com/archives/D0BJ954U9JR/p1785458275394659 on Slack.
MassCartog (2026-07-29 21:51:20+00:00): FYI this object was removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186601966 but another user just said "not flock". Wanted to let you know in case that was not true.
silversurfer83 (2026-07-28 19:59:38+00:00): Hi nick-28 :)

kennst du die Taste, mit der du Objekte (Gebäude) rechtwinklig machst? Falls nicht: "Q". Einfach mal ausprobieren und schönere Gebäude haben ;)

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186533318
nick-28 (2026-07-29 10:02:19+00:00): Ja, kenne ich und benutze ich auch meistens; manchmal vergesse ich es leider. Aber die Realität ist eben auch nicht immer "schön" und manche Gebäude sind OTG schiefwinklig.

Gruß, Nick
silversurfer83 (2026-07-29 11:50:40+00:00): Alles klar
Ich schreib lieber einen Kommentar zu viel ;)

Happy mapping
pitscheplatsch (2026-07-28 18:47:37+00:00): Same as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186534877#c1635327
martinst (2026-07-29 07:42:18+00:00): Laut https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributors#Germany etc. darf man in Bayern aktuell leider keine Luftbilder wie DOP20 etc. verwenden.
chefche (2026-07-29 17:22:15+00:00): Bayern DOP20 ignoriert und gleiches Ergebnis mit Bing und Esri World Luftbilder (Clarity) Beta erhalten
martinst (2026-07-30 13:49:06+00:00): Wenns sowieso keinen Unterschied macht dann verwende doch bitte zukünftig Esri etc. und keine Quellen bei denen es Lizenzprobleme gibt.
silversurfer83 (2026-07-28 20:22:20+00:00): Moin

schau dir bitte mal diesen Zaun an https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/313519265 der sieht nicht korrekt aus.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186534461
Herwescheluc (2026-07-29 17:18:29+00:00): Hallo, ticki_52,

Hinweise beim Upload solltest Du ernst nehmen, sonst wird Dein Ignorieren derselben für ewig festgehalten, siehe oben dies hier:
warnings:mismatched_geometry:area_as_line 	3

Ergibt kein gutes Bild von Deiner "Arbeit", wenn einem das öfter begegnet...

Grüße

Andreas
Herwescheluc (2026-07-29 17:57:32+00:00): Hallo, ticky_52,

ich gebe @silversurfer83 recht, denn Deine erneute Bearbeitung ist wieder nicht passend. Wie Du hier bei Mapillary (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=153208296767414&focus=photo&lat=48.934933&lng=9.443476000000032&z=17) sehen kannst, ist der Zaun rechts vom Tor fence_type=temporary und links fence_type=corrugated_metal, also Wellblech. Ist besser als einfach nur Blech (metal_sheet). Beim Tor fehlt also noch material=corrugated_metal.

Grüße

Andreas
Frans S (2026-07-29 09:54:38+00:00): Hello.
You mapped this building, including the surrounding yard, rather than the building itself.
Check this webpage.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1545465370/history
Best regards
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-28 18:50:41+00:00): Thanks for fixing this, good job overall! Just a couple issues left:

- As iD warns you about, when connecting a footway to a building, assuming it isn't a mistake, it should usually be tagged as an entrance ( entrance=yes / entrance=main , etc or another appropriate tag )
- The footway from the building to the main road (South 12 Street, way 1545466630 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1545466630 ) should be connected to the road (like you did for the other one), otherwise it doesn't really serve a function allowing people to walk from the road to the building.

Thanks!
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-29 17:54:24+00:00): It seems you attempted to fix these issues in changeset 186543518 , although it seems it caused a bunch of other geometry issues:

https://osm.org/changeset/186543518
pitscheplatsch (2026-07-28 18:46:17+00:00): Hello. 

Could you please provide an authoritative source for this mass rename, preferably an official Moroccan publication or photographs of current road signs?

The announcement and available reporting use "President Donald J. Trump Highway" or "Donald Trump Highway", whereas this changeset adds "Voie Express Donald Trump" to many individual ways. 

I could not find support for that exact French wording, and some recent reporting states that Moroccan authorities had not yet confirmed an official renaming.
sksm cto (2026-07-28 19:07:23+00:00): Hello, 

Find below some of sources:

https://fr.le360.ma/politique/la-voie-express-tiznit-dakhla-baptisee-donald-trump-highway-le-president-americain-remercie-le-roi_NPEZ4MNVYNC5HK75GPTNMAOKJE/

https://www.brut.media/afrique/videos/afrique/politique/maroc-une-autoroute-rebaptisee-donald-trump-highway

https://x.com/USAmbMorocco/status/2081474993985036548?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet

https://www.jeuneafrique.com/1827206/politique/donald-trump-a-son-autoroute-au-maroc/

https://share.google/aimode/P7KicFPwzNSmy17TM
pitscheplatsch (2026-07-28 19:46:30+00:00): Thank you for the additional links. 

They confirm that President Trump and the US ambassador publicly presented the corridor under the English name “President Donald J. Trump Highway”, and that several media outlets reported this as a renaming.

However, they still do not support the actual tagging in this changeset:
(1) Le360 and Brut base their reports on Trump’s post and accompanying video; they do not cite a Moroccan decree, ministry announcement, road-authority publication, or current signs.
(2) Trump’s written post does not state the road name. The accompanying video uses “President Donald J. Trump Highway”.
(3) None of the sources uses or supports the value “Voie Express Donald Trump” that was added to the OSM ways.
(4) A report attributed to MAP says that the road “will be named” after Trump, while other reporting states that no Moroccan authority had publicly announced a naming decision at that point.
(5) The US ambassador’s post is relevant diplomatic communication, but it is not a decision by the Moroccan authority responsible for road naming.

The shared Google AI Mode response is not itself a source; any original documents cited within it would need to be evaluated separately.

Could you therefore provide a primary Moroccan source or photographs of current signs confirming:
- the exact locally used name;
- whether the naming is already in force;
- the precise geographical extent;
- and that it is the name of each physical road segment rather than the overall corridor?
schobbish (2026-07-29 04:59:53+00:00): Reverted in changeset 186561469. Please follow our tagging conventions and do not include promotional material in your edits. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers.
pitscheplatsch (2026-07-28 18:47:09+00:00): Same as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186534877#c1635327
KarelianServal (2026-07-28 18:25:30+00:00): *fix #5422875
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-28 19:39:43+00:00): The standard, accepted format for NANP (e.g. US) phone numbers on OSM is +1-NNN-NNN-NNNN (with +1 NNN-NNN-NNNN and +1 NNN NNN NNNN being allowable alternatives). See https://osm.wiki/phone=*#United_States for more information. Thanks.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186536459
pitscheplatsch (2026-07-28 18:47:16+00:00): Same as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186534877#c1635327
pitscheplatsch (2026-07-28 18:47:23+00:00): Same as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186534877#c1635327
fx99 (2026-07-30 07:11:47+00:00): der Knoten 8042380269 (Baum) gehört sicher nicht zur L 1208a!
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2u1Z
Sylabowy Kot (2026-07-28 20:57:50+00:00): Nazwa podosiedla teraz nie renderuje się w Carto, jak nie powieli się landuse w tagach linii 377589663. Mimo, że po szarości widać, że informacja o landuse pobrała się z relacji. Tak źle i tak niedobrze.
glosada (2026-07-28 19:14:12+00:00): This is what you see at the "end of the road" https://photos.app.goo.gl/QgqFUxvegZFFziNEA
Fraxi (2026-07-28 19:55:02+00:00): Сигурен ли си, че https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13091983413 е клон на ДСК? И аз съм виждал техното лого там. Но в бл. 33 си имат клон, май с 2 банкомата. Когато там правеха ремонт, временно май работеха от офиса в бл. 30. В техния сайт там не е отбелязан клон.
Fraxi (2026-07-28 19:56:58+00:00): Иначе доста си се постарал с тази промяна, не го приемай лично.
Kaloan-koko (2026-07-28 20:11:19+00:00): Цялата ситуация около това място е странна. 
На това, което изглежда като изпразнен магазин node/14056934389 има облепени 2-3 плаката на ДСК.
На този възел не само пише ДСК на входа с работно време, ами и лампите бяха включени и имаха някакви рекламни материали. Наистина, ATM не видях, освен ако не е скрит вътре, но иначе си беше организирано като банка - Г образна последователност от бюра и пред тях столчета като за клиенти.
Допълнително, по някое време зимата, дали края на 2025 или началото на 2026, имаше ремонт на клона в бл. 33.
Тогава на витрината беше залепено, че клонът временно се мести зад блока, или нещо от сорта.
Въобще не съм го ползвал, но си спомням като обикалях сградите преди няколко седмици, че се сетих са това и се чудих как може да е бил зад блока, като там няма нищо (страната на блоковете откъм градинката).
Много е вероятно тогава да са визирали туй чудо тука, а пък защо после не са го затворили, ми е абсолютно непонятно.
Вероятно временно са обитавали и празния обект посочен по-горе.
Kaloan-koko (2026-07-28 20:18:02+00:00): Всъщност най-странното от тази обилока е може би node/11555135072.
Като го видях, си мислех, че е грешна информация в POI, вместо на сградата.
Обаче наистина има вратичка от страната на блок 63 (даже май са 2), а и по спомен малко преди ремонта на тротоара и създаването на фитнеса в околността, първо направиха заграждането от страната на Смърч.
Около това време 2 пъти видях една врата отворена, като един път двама влизаха/излизаха.
Допълнително мястото има и климатик, което би било безсмислено, ако не работят хора.
Много странен избор на поставяне на обекти са имали едно време, защото има празен и то с витрини на друга подстанция в Стрелбище (node/13011122850).
Dimitar155 (2026-07-28 23:15:21+00:00): Помещенията в блок 30 са на ДСК, но са само две. Северното има два входа.

Преди 15 години са били офиси за клиенти. Или поне имаше големи надписи над помещенията, не съм влизал тогава. Като санираха блока надписите изчезнаха.

По време на ремонта на клона в блок 33 (септември 2025-януари 2026, месеците са по памет) офиса беше точно в Г-образното помещение в блок 30. Разположението вътре си беше както го е видял Коко.

Северното е занемарено (може и да не се ползва). Източното е офис за служители (office=*). Отдел "Събиране на вземания" или нещо подобно. На стъклото към Хайдушка гора си пише какво е.

Помещението в трафопоста си е на ЕРМ Запад. Отпред си паркират служебния автомобил. Вероятно е аварийна група.

В трафопоста с витрините в Стрелбище имаше малка пекарна или ресторантче.
Fraxi (2026-07-29 07:48:34+00:00): Ами, @Dimitar155, имай предвид, че във версия №2 на https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13091983413(или https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178282978) ТИ си махнал таговете на ДСК и си добавил office=company. И аз оттам също си помислих, че явно има грешка и че вече това място няма нищо общо с ДСК. Иначе, отделно и на техния сайт явно не може да се разчита.
Dimitar155 (2026-07-29 07:59:11+00:00): Не съм го мислил особено... Коригирах таговете.
Frans S (2026-07-29 09:50:25+00:00): Hello. 
About your mappings. Here you clustered many buildings and tagged them as 1 building.
Please map each individually.
Quality prevails above quantity
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186540298
rarad74 (2026-07-29 15:01:51+00:00): Buna. Ce treaba ai avut sa schimbi O strada tocmai din Capatanesti de langa Buzau daca tu editezi in Bucuresti? Ai pus si nume gresit. Ce era inainte era corec. Ai pus sens unic spre iesire spre drumul rincipal. practic ai blocat strada. Te rog termina cu aberatiile. E suficient ca  adaugati informatii invalide pentru acesta harta pentru ca asa v-a zis un profesor. Te rog terminati cu prostiile si spune-i profesorului tau sa va dea ca material didactic orice altceva, numai NU aceasta harta.
Andrea Musuruane (2026-07-30 15:27:05+00:00): Hi. What's the purpose of these changesets? Adding foot=designated to highway=footway makes no sense. BR, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186540805
Sylabowy Kot (2026-07-28 20:55:57+00:00): Label Rudawki został dodany bez źródła, więc nie wiadomo, czy odpowiadał za oznaczenie tego osiedla. Teraz trochę nie ma sensu. Zatrasie jako obszar MSI obejmuje też te osiedle, a wcześniej oba osiedla były jako jedno - Żoliborz IV.
IvaKraljić (2026-07-29 18:37:57+00:00): The missing segment has since been tagged in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186603004#map=19/19.298961/-99.157029. #OptimoRoute
mga_geo (2026-07-31 06:25:52+00:00): Bonjour,
Pour la relation r4259831 il y a toujours des trous.
Bon courage
Marc
PS: l'utilisation de JOSM facilite l'édition des relations.
pitscheplatsch (2026-07-29 08:20:38+00:00): Hallo, willkommen bei OSM.

Was ist denn "Hinweis 5108253"?

Viele Grüße
ToniE (2026-07-29 10:51:38+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5108253#map=19/48.190655/11.648241&layers=N
pitscheplatsch (2026-07-29 11:15:08+00:00): @ToniE
:D ok, da hab ich in dem Moment mal gar nicht dran gedacht. Danke.
Frank Peng (2026-07-30 01:56:10+00:00): Hey Aline, this changeset removed the valid sidewalk:both=separate tag from the Coverstone Drive way (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/686441344) even though aerial imagery clearly shows sidewalks on both sides of the road. It is important not to remove tags you don't understand or have no meaning to you (such as the sidewalk:both=separate tag that you removed in this changeset) as it's against OSM Good practice. They may have been added for a specific purpose. Per the "Good practice" article on OSM Wiki, it states:

> Sometimes you will come across elements with tags that have no meaning to you. This doesn't automatically mean you should remove them. They may have been added for a specific purpose. If you think they might be junk then try to contact the author.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_remove_tags_that_you_don't_understand

I understand that you're new at OSM, and it's common for new OSM mappers to make mistakes. When other mappers try to make us aware of mistakes we may be making on OSM, we need to respond to those mappers and learn from those mistakes so we can become better mappers. I have restored the valid sidewalk:both=separate tag on the way in changeset 186619486.
https://osmcha.org/changesets/186619486
wireguy (2026-07-30 10:32:56+00:00): Bob, thanks for the updates!  phone numbers should be formatted  +1-123-123-1234.  I've updated these.  Keep mapping!
ElliottPlack (2026-07-28 20:31:52+00:00): meant to use the change set comment: added lots of woods and residential landuse
Sammyhawkrad (2026-07-29 07:59:13+00:00): Hi Albert Sam, welcome to OSM. Only official names are added in the name=* tag. Other descriptive details like location are not part of the name. They are recorded with other tags, e.g addr:city=*, addr:suburb=* etc. Further details can also be provided in the description=*. 

The changes here will be reverted.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-29 18:23:32+00:00): Thanks, this looks pretty good! I just cleaned up the leftover added nodes attached to the road and a few to the buildings. There were also a couple area-mapped footways for the big corner building that hadn't been fixed yet, so I went ahead and fixed those as well.

One thing: driveway https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1545501355 was directly connected to garage https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1023814356 which is okay to do assuming there's a garage door here (as I would assume there is), but it needs to have entrance=garage tagged on it (like with the footways intersecting the building mentioned previously). I added that as well.

Final cleanup done in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/186602097
MappingMore (2026-07-30 06:58:37+00:00): Reverted in  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186626491