piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mueschel (2024-10-29 18:59:21+00:00): Hi,
all the 4000 trees you imported here have many strange tags that are not in use in any other place.

Please make sure you always use common tagging styles and don't invent new tags.

Additionally: As this is a large import, please point us to the required documentation of it. The source of the data is also missing in the changeset.
Please read and follow our Import Guidelines:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines


Example tags:
    arbotag = 194
    circumference_class_description = 240-299 cm
    circumference_class_id = 4
    city = Liège
    class_height_description = 15-19.9 m
    class_height_number = 3
    class_top_diameter_description = 10-14.9 m
    class_top_diameter_number = 2
    icar_street_id = 7729938
    municipality = Liège
    postal_code = 4020
    remarkable = Non
    street_code = 7017
    street_name = Parc De La Boverie
    top_diameter = 13.0
    tree_species = Acer negundo
210x294 (2024-10-30 10:07:00+00:00): Hi,
strange tags are removed from this changeset, the rest will be modified soon and the source is added. Thank you.
mueschel (2024-11-02 17:27:00+00:00): There are still more than 2300 trees with these tags.
ivanbranco (2025-06-09 23:05:18+00:00): Hi Iski0,

the standard unit for the circumference value is meters. e.g. 
circumference=183.0 should be circumference=1.83

could you fix them? thanks and good mapping
210x294 (2025-06-11 07:29:21+00:00): Hi ivanbranco,
if you have some proposition on how to do it i'm happy to do it.
ivanbranco (2025-06-11 10:01:36+00:00): I will try doing it myself. I tried it with two nodes and worked, I will go on with the rest of them soon:  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167482890
Hungerburg (2024-10-29 16:58:27+00:00): Hallo Trailguru, wenn du solche Abschneider wie bei der Umbrückleralm einträgst, bitte mehr als nur "path" eintragen: surface=dirt, informal=yes zumindestens? Weil path steht für alles, von 3m breit asphaltiert bis unscheinbare Steigspuren im Gelände.
Trailguru100 (2024-10-29 17:08:06+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis, wusste Ich nicht. Hab's bereits hinzugefügt.
Hungerburg (2024-11-02 16:36:30+00:00): Hmm, vielleicht noch ein bicycle=no, das ist rechtlich auch richtig. Das Forstgesetz verlangt ja, dass die Erlaubnis ausgeschildert sein muss.

Vgl. https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_bicycle&route=47.28507%2C11.38992%3B47.29253%2C11.37883#map=16/47.28881/11.38395&layers=C
Trailguru100 (2024-11-04 13:41:59+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis, habs geändert
HugoC01 (2024-10-28 11:45:10+00:00): Pourquoi avez-vous enlever la ref de ce lampadaire ?
ArthµrC2016 (2024-10-28 12:15:37+00:00): parce que vous vous avez enlevez le type d'poteau à planfoy
HugoC01 (2024-10-28 12:22:56+00:00): Le type du poteaux électrique à Plantfoy n'était pas le bon.
Or la ref de ce lampadaire est belle et bien la bonne.
Et cela n'explique pas pourquoi vous mettez "Delta" en type sur des poteaux électriques à Frans alors que le bon type est "One_level".
Je vous est pourtant envoyer plusieurs fois le lien vers la page du wiki sur l'attribut type des poteaux et pylone électriques.
HugoC01 (2024-10-28 12:24:59+00:00): Êtes vous un vandale ?
ArthµrC2016 (2024-10-28 12:27:39+00:00): aussi les images satelite ont peut pas voir trés bien dessu
HugoC01 (2024-10-28 12:29:40+00:00): Qu'es qu'on ne peut pas bien voir ?
HugoC01 (2024-10-28 12:39:11+00:00): Cela n'explique toujours pas pourquoi vous remettez "Delta" en type sur des poteaux électriques à Frans lorsque je mets "One_level".
Je sais très bien que le type est "One_level", j'y est vérifié plusieurs fois sur le terrain, la dernière fois c'était il y a 2 ou 3 semaines.
Donc merci de laisser "One_level" en type sur les poteaux concerner et ne plus ajouter de fausses informations
ArthµrC2016 (2024-10-29 10:13:42+00:00): 2 messages mes je vais le faire en un message déja le poteaux a frans ce sont des  delta le poteau a planfoy c'est un two-level parce que ont peut pas voir ci c'est bon type ou pas
HugoC01 (2024-10-29 10:27:11+00:00): Quand on sait pas, on met pas
Et pour les poteaux de Frans, allons discuter sur ce changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158452553
Syl (2024-10-28 15:40:17+00:00): Bonjour, pour les postes électriques sur des poteaux ça a l'air d'être ça les attributs conseillés : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Power_networks/France#Cat%C3%A9gories_de_postes
HugoC01 (2024-10-29 09:53:06+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai remplacé les attributs sur ce poste
eggie (2024-10-28 12:44:13+00:00): Dag Robert. Ik heb het deels verder aangepast en de note verwijderd.
Opgeleverde woningen van construction afgehaald.
https://viewer.satellietdataportaal.nl/@52.29873,4.592698,18/?datastrip=20241025_PNEO-03

MVG
eggie
rempshaener (2024-10-28 18:22:03+00:00): Hallo,
du hast um eine Überprüfung deiner Änderungen gebeten.
Ich habe keine besonderen Anmerkungen, deine Anpassung ist fehlerfrei.
Ich habe nur eine grundsätzliche Anmerkung: Die diversen Tags für AFu-Programme sind zwar grundsätzlich dokumentiert (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:communication:amateur_radio), aber nur im Status "in Benutzung". So besteht immer das Risiko, das irgendwann mal jemand auf Grund der diversen IOTA-, SOTA- und POTA-Objekte die Reißlinie zieht. Am saubersten wäre es, wenn jemand beizeiten mal ein Proposal (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Proposal_process) einreichen würde. Das muss ja noch nicht einmal zwingend aus Deutschland erfolgen, das ist letztlich ein internationales Problem.
Meinen Segen habt ihr :-)
Viele Grüße
philipp (2024-10-28 19:02:36+00:00): Lieber rempshaener,
ups, da bin ich tatsächlich ausgerutscht. Eigentlich wollte ich gar keine Überprüfung, habe aber blöderweise anscheinend den Button in iD angewählt.
Danke aber für deine Bestärkung! Wir hatten neulich unter einer anderen Relation die Diskussion, ob wir die POTA-Tags hinzufügen dürfen. Den Hinweis auf das Proposal finde ich gut und konstruktiv; das werden wir sicherlich mal angehen.

Herzlichen Dank für deine Mühen!
Philipp
rempshaener (2024-10-28 19:33:29+00:00): Kein Problem!
lyctkel (2024-10-29 16:16:01+00:00): Hi Ptolemapper,
all other containers for plastic packaging etc. around here are for pmd (see 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Arecycling%3Apmd).
Is this maybe a container for pmd as well?
Regards,
lyctkel
HugoC01 (2024-10-28 12:02:48+00:00): C'est un one_level pas un delta
HugoC01 (2024-10-28 12:48:13+00:00): pourquoi vous remettez "Delta" en type sur des poteaux électriques à Frans lorsque je mets "One_level".
Je sais très bien que le type est "One_level", j'y est vérifié plusieurs fois sur le terrain, la dernière fois c'était il y a 2 ou 3 semaines.
Donc merci de laisser "One_level" en type sur les poteaux concerner
ArthµrC2016 (2024-10-29 10:28:54+00:00): delta et pas  one-level
HugoC01 (2024-10-29 10:33:00+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:design?uselang=fr
HugoC01 (2024-10-29 10:33:21+00:00): Lisez bien les descriptions
ArthµrC2016 (2024-10-30 10:34:57+00:00): c'est moi qui est mal vue je devrai acheter des lunette
CurlingMan13 (2024-10-29 02:07:52+00:00): You requested a review of your changeset.  It looks good - thank you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158452572
divaddivag (2024-10-28 12:45:18+00:00): Salut JB, je l'ai rajouté car le marchand de glaces/gaufres et cie existe mais je n'avais trouvé de Siret sur le moment... Qui gère cela, je ne sais pas. Ce type de POI est assez galère sur la côte donc je ne m'en ferais pas trop. Par exemple, il y a une boite basée à Cabourg spécialiste des trucs pas toujours identifiables: https://annuaire-entreprises.data.gouv.fr/entreprise/marva-hotel-albert-1er-442169488#etablissements A+ D
karr4s (2024-10-29 12:08:11+00:00): Yes, pas de soucis. Limite, pour ce genre de cas, on peut mettre des infos dans "notes" et pas dans "fixme" ?
Gregory Peony (2024-11-01 18:33:22+00:00): WAY: 1328787838 appears to me to be vegetation; not a building.--- It appears that you moved connected building footprints. Either select all of the connected features and move them simultaneously or unglue/disconnect the features to prevent unwanted geometry changes.--- I corrected the errors in Changeset: 158631711. Use that as a reference.--- Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158452961
wermak (2024-10-29 17:17:46+00:00): Hallo Lutz,

Du hast mit deinen Änderungen aus einer ehemaligen Bahnstrecke eine heute vorhandene Bahnstrecke eingetragen. Geplante Bahnstrecken sind aber ausschließlich railway:proposed. Außerdem hast du vorhandene Gebäude aus der Karte einfach gelöscht, z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/115567514/history.
Dies war ein schwerer Fehler. Ich habe deshalb deine Änderungen zurückgesetzt/revertiert, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158508290.
Geplante Bahnstrecken bitte ausschließlich mit proposed:* in der Karte eintragen u. dabei niemals vorhandene Objekte aus der Karte löschen.

Schöne Grüße
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-07 19:36:13+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12293859683/history has power = 22 that was added in this edit
What this tag means? Numeric value is unexpected here and it is unclear what it means
Rodrigo Rega (2024-10-29 22:27:19+00:00): El comentario de este conjunto de cambios no es lo suficientemente descriptivo para que el resto de usuarios se hagan una idea de cuáles han sido los elementos que se han editado. Por favor, consulta la siguiente página para saber como hacer comentarios que faciliten el trabajo de revisión de ediciones: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenos_comentarios_en_conjuntos_de_cambios

Gracias por tus aportes a OpenStreetMap.

Un saludo.
CurlingMan13 (2024-10-29 02:05:25+00:00): Changeset looks good.  Minor corrections needed, but I took care of it for you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158454327
Tatfahren (2024-10-31 18:52:27+00:00): Hallo HPHenschel,
du hast bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1328796630 ein 85 Meter langes Tor eingetragen. Ich vermute das war ein Versehen, kann es aber aufgrund des unscharfen Luftbilds im iD-Editor nicht selber korrigieren.

Kannst du da vielleicht nochmal nachsehen?

Danke!
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2024-10-28 20:07:59+00:00): Haha! Merci! Good catch!
ilias_ (2024-10-29 11:43:20+00:00): Hi! Please try to separate your edits. You made one edit in France and one in Guinea, so your changeset covers like 10 countries. Thank you!
hhrazaka (2024-10-29 16:43:29+00:00): Hi, 
Sorry ! I haven't mastered JOSM quite well yet. Thank you for your feedback !
Best regards.
eggie (2024-10-28 16:21:16+00:00): Hoi,
Het bankje heb ik losgemaakt van het bosvlak.
In Josm kun je plakken voorkomen door de linker CTRL toets te gebruiken tijdens bewerken.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=158454801
Groet
eggie
DBL707 (2024-10-28 16:31:30+00:00): Hoi Eggie,
Is prima had zelf het idee dat het de exacte coordinaten waren. Had al zittend op het bankje een waypoint gemaakt en deze geupload naar JOSM en daar het bankje ingetekend.
Gr Bing
eggie (2024-10-28 16:46:45+00:00): Het bankje staat er nog steeds. Ik heb het alleen losgemaakt. :)
Die editors hebben een soort ingebouwde lijm. Met de G toets kun je iets dan weer losmaken mocht het plakken.
Het is geen ramp.
Mapse
DBL707 (2024-10-28 16:52:54+00:00): Aaaah Oke snap het, thx.
Fijne avond verder.
gr Bing
map per (2024-11-02 22:21:16+00:00): Hi,

(1) sieht komisch aus, warum ist dort eine Tourismusbüro am Bahnsteig?

Viele Grüße
map per

(1) https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12293888334
drlellinger (2024-11-02 23:04:06+00:00): Erstens es ist unter dem Bahnsteig und ich würde es eher mit einem Infoschalter vergleichen. Warum der da ist Keine Ahnung
map per (2024-11-03 15:35:58+00:00): Ok, danke, hab tourism=office durch tourism=helpdesk ersetzt
map per (2024-11-08 07:59:00+00:00): Zu CS 158728708:
Eine DB Information ist kein Tourismusbüro / Fremdenverkehrsamt (tourism=information + information=office) (vgl. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:information%3Doffice)
drlellinger (2024-11-08 16:02:53+00:00): Ok und was dann? Denn einen Tag zu verwenden der nur 5mal weltweit kartiert wurde und in keinerweise standardisiert ist, ist aus meiner Sicht auch keine Option
map per (2024-11-08 17:25:03+00:00): Ein Proposal hab ich für 'helpdesk' bisher immerhin geschrieben (2). 
Aber das ist halt OSM, wenn es kein etabliertes tagging für DB Informationen gibt bleibt einem nichts anderes übrig als einen neuen Tag zu Erfinden.

(2) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Helpdesk
dcapillae (2024-10-28 15:56:52+00:00): Buenas tardes.

Este conjunto de cambios fue revertido.

¿Está seguro de que no hay un contenedor para botellas de cristal ? Si lo que quiere es añadir un contenedor adicional que acepta envases de plástico, no use «recycling:plastic=yes». Use en su lugar el siguiente etiquetado:

amenity=recycling
recycling_type=container
recycling:plastic_bottles=yes
recycling:plastic_packaging= yes
recycling:cans=yes

(En Málaga, este tipo de contenedores también aceptan latas)

Gracias por su colaboración,

Atentamente,
Daniel Capilla
nohelylagos03 (2024-10-28 13:29:48+00:00): Se hacen tramites para becarios, y estudiantes especiales
SKald (2026-06-18 08:06:29+00:00): why did you put the start of the "Lärchkogelgrat"-Tour at this place? I'd start at the south/east-end of the parking, but haven't done so for several years now. Has it changed?
-=|MisterY|=- (2026-06-18 08:12:26+00:00): Most likely I've used the info from Bergsteigen at the time.
birdlawyer (2024-10-30 19:47:01+00:00): Hello, and thanks for your interest in OSM. It appears that the features you're mapping do not exist in reality and so I've reverted this changeset in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158556171. Please refrain from mapping features that do not exist on the ground. You can learn more about making accurate and appropriate contributions to OpenStreetMap at https://learnosm.org/. However, if you're more interested in creative mapping, I'd recommend checking out https://www.opengeofiction.net. Happy mapping!
emersonveenstra (2024-10-28 16:25:24+00:00): Hi there,

Once again, this golf course has been closed for almost a decade. Please stop mapping it
tcathey668 (2024-10-28 21:05:58+00:00): Sorry…I did not originally map it….it was already mapped when I went in for the first time yesterday. I was temporarily adding some features to the existing map to use for creating/preserving the course for a sim.
Vinber-Pro (2025-01-03 16:31:20+00:00): bonjour,
bonne année :)

et sans grande importance mais pour que tu le saches, il y avait un "espace" en trop dans la rue d'Arcangues (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1226629956). Le nom provenant de la BAN si je comprend bien, il semble qu'il y ait des erreurs de typo.

bonne carto
Mic6464 (2025-01-04 13:37:13+00:00): Bonjour et merci à toi. Bonne année également !

Ca ne m'étonne pas. J'ai l'habitude de faire un copié-collé du nom de voie dans la BAN pour éviter les fautes de frappe, les interversions de lettres. Je rajoute les accents sur les "e" et "a" quand c'est évident. Et tu as raison, parfois il y a un vilain espace dans la BAN entre l'apostrophe et la première lettre. J'oublie de modifier parfois. Il est vraisemblable que j'aie commis la même erreur à d'autres endroits.
Cordialement
SekeRob (2024-10-28 13:51:08+00:00): For readers: https://www.deskaeronautico.it/s04-24-lavori-per-allungamento-pista-a-pescara/

As with anything related to construction in/round Pescara involving tax money, I see it when I see it, which is, saw the typical construction orange fencing, I think.
CurlingMan13 (2024-10-29 02:04:10+00:00): reviewed.  accepted change request.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158457014
literan (2024-10-28 17:34:39+00:00): пешеходам же там можно пройти (стоит брус-отбойник от машин), зачем полностью разрывать связь?
Stanislav_1001 (2024-10-29 08:56:00+00:00): там был тупик и запрет на проезд, но всё равно маршрут строился, только порез помог
literan (2024-10-29 16:52:33+00:00): мапить под конкретный роутер запрещено. Я чуть позже исправлю здесь так, как оно на местности
Benoît C MdP (2024-11-04 14:05:28+00:00): Bonjour

Merci pour cette contribution, mais tu as cassé un itinéraire cyclable structurant. Je corrige.

Benoît
VLD275 (2024-11-07 17:43:03+00:00): Hello Benoit,
Thank you for your comments. I have reviewed and understand the issue I created. I appreciate you making the correction. I will be mindful of this going forward.
Regards,
Rick.
Đuro Jiří (2025-08-24 12:51:32+00:00): Ciao Dom61, posso sapere perché hai aggiunto su questo edificio layer=1?
Visto, che hai scritto "errata corrige",non riesco capire.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/145875957
NeisBot (2024-10-28 14:00:38+00:00): Hi mwmatek, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 91% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 5 highway(s)
- 1 landuse(')

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=158457605
pitscheplatsch (2024-10-29 05:18:25+00:00): Hi mwmatek, thanks for your private message and your explanation.

Unfortunately, several of your deleted paths (footpaths) can still be seen on the satellite images in this region. Especially in the area of the “Obrońców Westerplatte” road. I therefore find some of your changes questionable.
dcapillae (2024-10-28 15:45:16+00:00): Buenas tardes.

Este conjunto de cambios fue revertido.

El etiquetado correcto para un contenedor de reciclaje que acepta envases de plástico es el original:

recycling:plastic_bottles=yes
recycling:plastic_packaging= yes

En Málaga, estos contenedores también aceptan latas:

recycling:cans=yes

Atentamente,
Daniel Capilla
CurlingMan13 (2024-10-29 02:26:55+00:00): Changeset reverted.  We use something called "access tags" to denote as private and prevent it from being used by the public.  You can read more here:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property#:~:text=In%20OSM%2C%20we%20map%20what's,path%20and%20add%20it%20again.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158479874
Fraxi (2025-08-30 10:31:56+00:00): Ричард, имаш ли представа защо аптека "Ремедиум" от тази промяна е с таг shop=chemist? Да го махна?
rhhs (2025-08-30 11:24:03+00:00): That branch of Remedium is much bigger than the others, and is selling some medicine but much more cosmetics etc. So it's more like a chemist than a pharmacy
JassKurn (2024-10-28 14:25:23+00:00): A revert of changeset 158209209 made by coastlinebot
Part of group of changesets from new account, made over two days, that introduce errors. coastlinebot has failed to respond to requests to explain edits.
JassKurn (2024-10-28 14:29:35+00:00): A revert of changeset 158209334 made by coastlinebot
Part of group of changesets from new account, made over two days, that introduce errors. coastlinebot has failed to respond to requests to explain edits.
JassKurn (2024-10-28 14:34:20+00:00): A revert of changeset 158209378 made by coastlinebot
Part of group of changesets from new account, made over two days, that introduce errors. coastlinebot has failed to respond to requests to explain edits.
JassKurn (2024-10-28 14:37:16+00:00): A revert of changeset 158209698 made by coastlinebot
Part of group of changesets from new account, made over two days, that introduce errors. coastlinebot has failed to respond to requests to explain edits.
yrtimiD (2024-10-30 12:44:39+00:00): Hello, you did here a pretty big change. Please describe what it was about?
Also, will appreciate if you'll use more meaningful commit messages on big changes in the future.
gscholz (2024-11-29 08:54:55+00:00): Hi ygtylc,
your recent edits have left behind several errors regarding overlapping ways (blue markers);

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=34.15566&lat=39.15458&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas

As you may know, this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps.

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
JassKurn (2024-10-28 14:42:13+00:00): 
A revert of changeset 158209721 made by coastlinebot
Part of group of changesets from new account, made over two days, that introduce errors. coastlinebot has failed to respond to requests to explain edits.
JassKurn (2024-10-28 14:44:07+00:00): A revert of changeset 158209761 made by coastlinebot
Part of group of changesets from new account, made over two days, that introduce errors. coastlinebot has failed to respond to requests to explain edits.
eggie (2024-10-28 14:52:32+00:00): Dag karazz  EigenWeg wil niet zeggen Verboden Toegang. 
Meestal wordt dan access=permissive getagd. Dat was hier ook het geval.
Ook handig voor bezorgdiensten. 

Een afgesloten hek en een bordje art 461 maakt het wel private..   

MVG
eggie
JassKurn (2024-10-28 14:45:50+00:00): A revert of changeset 158237655 made by coastlinebot
Part of group of changesets from new account, made over two days, that introduce errors. coastlinebot has failed to respond to requests to explain edits.
JassKurn (2024-10-28 14:48:13+00:00): A revert of changeset 158237681 made by coastlinebot
Part of group of changesets from new account, made over two days, that introduce errors. coastlinebot has failed to respond to requests to explain edits.
user_3022894 (2024-11-28 21:51:34+00:00): Hallo mono1969,

Die Tags für den S-Bahnsteig in Düsseldorf-Garath sind bereits an der Relation vorhanden. Du brauchst sie nicht nochmal an den Umriss des Bahnsteigs taggen.

Viele Grüße
Lukas
mono1969 (2024-11-29 05:05:40+00:00): OK
infeeeee (2024-10-29 11:03:59+00:00): Szia!

Kérlek a módosításcsomagjaidnak adj valami rövid leírást, összefoglalást: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments


A note mező nem erre való, mint a szobornál használtad, elvileg az más szerkesztőknek szóló üzenet, ez a leírás description-be jobban illene: 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:note

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description
JassKurn (2024-10-28 14:58:25+00:00): 
A fix for changeset 158237698 made by coastlinebot
Part of group of changesets from new account, made over two days, that introduce errors. coastlinebot has failed to respond to requests to explain edits.
JassKurn (2024-10-28 15:01:29+00:00): A revert of changeset 158237734 made by coastlinebot
Part of group of changesets from new account, made over two days, that introduce errors. coastlinebot has failed to respond to requests to explain edits.
JassKurn (2024-10-28 15:04:41+00:00): 
A revert of changeset 158237747 made by coastlinebot
Part of group of changesets from new account, made over two days, that introduce errors. coastlinebot has failed to respond to requests to explain edits.
eggie (2024-10-28 15:50:40+00:00): Beste Maarten..
..description=.... is niet bedoeld voor reclame-uitingen.
De website zal voldoende info geven. Het wordt gezien als spam.
Beter verwijderen.
Mvg
eggie
MaartenMap (2024-10-28 17:11:37+00:00): Ok, is verwijderd.
eggie (2024-10-28 17:14:00+00:00): 👍
JassKurn (2024-10-28 15:06:53+00:00): A revert of changeset 158237757 made by coastlinebot
Part of group of changesets from new account, made over two days, that introduce errors. coastlinebot has failed to respond to requests to explain edits.