piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
maciek-szn (2023-07-27 22:07:26+00:00): Wycofane.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139108390
GinaroZ (2023-07-28 15:07:50+00:00): Does this path connect to the road? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1192752941
maciek-szn (2023-07-27 22:07:32+00:00): Wycofane.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139108631
abdul_4ts (2023-08-02 23:29:27+00:00): great mapping eadomako3
please don't forget to join highways to existing highways. happy mapping
Quixlian (2023-07-27 23:17:19+00:00): Mapping this part of the street as a motorway creates problems for users trying to avoid motorways using navigation apps. This can be avoided by creating a fictional division with two roads adjacent to each other, or reclassifying this road as a trunk so users can stay on the right and not break any laws without having to navigate to adjacent streets in order to avoid the main highway.
csimeona22 (2023-07-28 21:26:02+00:00): Thank you for the message ayowyoqrjjmwi. Since this change is related to another edit, I have responded more thoroughly on changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139108054

Sincerely,
Csimeona22
arjunaraoc (2024-01-11 01:11:44+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
Reverted your changeset as it is vandalism vide https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146123831

Upload changes in nearby areas as a separate changeset.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139108835
maciek-szn (2023-07-27 22:07:38+00:00): Wycofane.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139108842
Supaplex (2023-07-28 03:10:16+00:00): Hi започе8

Could you split your changesets into at least three parts? These changesets cross from Russia, China, Madagascar.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139108861
julcnx (2023-07-29 03:16:19+00:00): Hi there! Thank you for your contributions! Just a friendly tip for next time, it's a good practice to save and upload your changes before moving on to the next area. Also adding a clear description makes it easier for others to review your changes.
abdul_4ts (2023-08-03 01:49:02+00:00): thanks for mapping LevinaFosu.
please consider joining highways to other highways. happy mapping
❤️‍🔥 (2023-07-29 00:14:55+00:00): hi, the website of this business does not exist. do you have another source for this edit? for example, is there a sign on the road, or does this business have a telephone number or a facebook page? thanks
CoyKoi (2023-07-30 01:25:01+00:00): See also https://www.reddit.com/r/NZTrees/comments/xbzsv9/has_anyone_used_weed_shop_nz_or_is_it_a_hoax/
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139109047
CoyKoi (2023-07-31 22:01:15+00:00): I've deleted the node
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139109047
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-11 15:46:35+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16135209/history has amenity = church that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What you meant by amenity=church? It seem to be not documented value and it seems to be a duplicate of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dplace_of_worship - if you meant christian church then then it is taggable by amenity=place_of_worship religion=christian.
DareDJ (2023-07-28 08:12:05+00:00): Hello Santanaloba53,

you added this way:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1174682534
into relation:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7153752
repeatedly.
Can you please check it out?
Thanks
DareDJ (2023-07-28 08:20:19+00:00): Hello Santanaloba53,

you added this way:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1175244252
into relation:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7153751
repeatedly.
Can you please check it out?
Thanks
maciek-szn (2023-07-27 22:19:23+00:00): Wycofane.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139109336
maciek-szn (2023-07-27 22:19:39+00:00): Wycofane.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139109441
maciek-szn (2023-07-27 22:23:25+00:00): Wycofane
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139109540
CurlingMan13 (2023-07-28 06:23:07+00:00): Please use better changeset comments to describe what you did and why.  Smashing your face into the keyboard to output random characters probably doesn't feel good and definitely doesn't help.  Thanks.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139109580
MxxCon (2023-07-30 05:15:02+00:00): Hello.
This edit will be reverted in full since according to OSM wiki definition suburb is a more accurate tag value for Brooklyn. This has been discussed multiple times in the local community. It would be great if you consulted there first before making such significant changes.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139195544
tyfi (2023-07-27 22:34:50+00:00): Bounding box is large because I added layer=4 and layer=5 tags on two power lines crossing roads I touched.
tyfi (2023-07-27 22:35:15+00:00): I also added is_in:county tags to relations for all four mentioned supplemental route relations.
tyfi (2023-07-27 22:36:52+00:00): Make that "six", and include O and M.
maciek-szn (2023-07-27 22:38:25+00:00): Wycofane.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139109861
maciek-szn (2023-07-27 22:38:35+00:00): Wycofane.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139109872
maciek-szn (2023-07-27 22:46:18+00:00): Wycofane.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139110018
NieWnen (2023-07-27 22:57:41+00:00): Dlaczego dodajesz fikcję? OSM do tego nie służy.

Jeśli potrzebujesz dodawać dane do mapy na własny użytek, możesz w tym celu użyć np. https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/

Jeśli jednak chcesz się pobawić w tworzenie fikcyjnych map, to możesz w tym celu korzystać z https://opengeofiction.net/

Nie dodawaj proszę fikcyjnych danych/nie zmieniaj błędnie kategorii dróg/stanu torowisk, czy nie importuj bez podawania źródeł. Takie zmiany zostaną wycofane jak ta.

Jeśli masz jakieś pytania jak coś zmapować poprawnie i nie znajdziesz informacji na https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page
Śmiało pytaj w zestawach zmian/na forum (https://community.openstreetmap.org/), czy na discordzie (link na stronie stowarzyszenia osmpl: https://openstreetmap.org.pl/)
Sunnysidesisters (2023-07-27 22:59:43+00:00): Should be: The Sunnyside Sisters Bed and Breakfast
danieldegroot2 (2023-07-27 23:28:17+00:00): See also
- https://www.tidytowns.ie/u_reports/2013/2013%20County%20Louth%20Reaghstown%20498.pdf
- https://www.tidytowns.ie/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/2015-County-Louth-Reaghstown-498-1.pdf
danieldegroot2 (2023-07-27 23:55:08+00:00): Opened additional note at
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3803060
(based on another source.)
arjunaraoc (2023-07-28 07:07:36+00:00): It may be good to focus on non track roads to support hotosm.
vladigivanov (2023-07-28 08:03:26+00:00): @arjunaraoc Thanks. I'm always a little bit unsure of the desired level of detail so decided to rather go with too much detail than not enough as most of the non-mapped roads seem to be quite minor here. Noted for future reference.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-12-19 16:02:22+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145297971
tordans (2023-07-28 09:57:19+00:00): Merci!
CurlingMan13 (2023-07-28 23:47:47+00:00): You should utilize multipolygon relations instead of these haphazard landcovers.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-01-28 18:32:54+00:00): was removal of highway=track intentional at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/10927254/history ?


I restored it based on aerial
trigpoint (2023-07-28 17:24:35+00:00): Bore da
This edit has gone a little wrong and has lost important information.

Have you visited and seen something that has recently changed?

In merging 'identical' ways together you have also merged the way that connected them which is not identical, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/925258534/history. This short section is in a culvet so no boats can pass, unless of course its a coracle which you can carry.

This edit needs to be reverted however I am intrigued as to why you made it.

Diolch Phil
Yunan973 (2023-07-29 20:18:57+00:00): Oups, sorry : I changed this because incoherences between the culvert and the canal area = the last one was drawn with a width of 5 meters under the bridge, incoherent with the culvert.

So I improved that area but in the wrong way.

I just made other changes, hope it's better https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/925258534#map=19/52.77990/-3.09442

Best regards
Yunan973 (2023-07-29 21:09:18+00:00): I remember why I chose the bad solution : the bridge.
A bridge means open space under it. A culvert means earth around it so no space under the bridge. So to have a bridge and a culvert is incoherent too.
The bridge + the canal is coherent, the bridge+the canal+the culvert is incoherent. I preferred to remove the culvert rather than the bridge+the canal.

So now the question is : should we remove the bridge ?
trigpoint (2023-07-30 10:51:28+00:00): Thank you.
My suspicion is that this never was a bridge. Carreghofa Lane originally crossed bridge 93, which now carries the cycleway slightly to the west. 

This needs a survey, which I will do if it stops raining for long enough, but my suspicion is that the bridge and note tags should be removed.

Dropped bridge is a copy of an error in wikipedia. It is not a bridge but filled in with a culvert running through it.

I have removed the bridge tags.

Cheers Phil
tyfi (2023-07-28 01:30:05+00:00): This northbound piece of North Truman Boulevard was only in US 67 relation, but the opposing way was correctly in both US 67 and US 61 relations.

No sources cited because this is just in OSM.
secondaryhighway (2023-07-28 01:41:04+00:00): This changeset fixed many errors from mseftekhari.
secondaryhighway (2023-07-28 05:09:54+00:00): These edits are mainly in Evin.
AlbertP (2023-08-28 18:27:01+00:00): It looks like you moved node #6316694923 out of its place, distorting the B12 road.
emersonveenstra (2023-08-03 20:35:58+00:00): Hi,

On https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1192776746, "steep" is not a valid value for the incline tag. Do you know if the way is going uphill or downhill?
Supaplex (2024-05-29 05:25:14+00:00): Revert due to it being a fake bus station

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151971201
CurlingMan13 (2023-07-28 23:48:35+00:00): Areas should not overlap.  they should either be fully within another area, or not.  There shouldn't be partial overlaps, such as what you have done with the "Rough".
Supaplex (2024-05-29 05:25:15+00:00): Revert due to it being a fake bus station

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151971201
jmarchon (2023-07-28 06:52:00+00:00): Hello!
Next time, try pressing Q after drawing a building to make it nice and square :)
Happy mapping!
Fizzie-DWG (2023-12-19 16:01:27+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145297943
abdul_4ts (2023-08-02 23:18:19+00:00): thanks for mapping khoby419, impressive
Supaplex (2024-05-29 05:25:16+00:00): Revert due to it being a fake bus station

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151971201
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-09 10:08:27+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11072292818/history has shop = drinks that was added in this edit
shop=drinks ? What kind of shop, if any is here? Is it intentionally used instead of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=beverages ? If yes, what is the difference? Should we document this shop value as distinct, valid and useful?
Kovoschiz (2023-07-28 11:16:50+00:00): `website=` is only used when each branch has its own page. This is at most `brand:website=` , and should instead be added to Wikidata.
richard23 (2023-08-17 20:26:32+00:00): Moin,
dein Tor liegt im Schnittpunkt von 3 Wegen und blockiert den Kirchenweg in Nord-Süd Richtung. Gewollt? Nehme an, das Tor ist für den Stichweg/Sackgasse nach Osten?
Gruß, Dirk
jocmap (2023-08-18 16:55:17+00:00): Ja, das ist der  Grund meiner Änderung. Das Tor ist verschlossen und der Durchgang nicht erlaubt.
Gruß
Jochen
richard23 (2023-08-19 08:25:03+00:00): Das mit "verschlossen" habe ich schon so verstanden. 
Frage war, welche Verbindung jetzt durch das Tor unterbrochen wird. (Und diese Wegesegmente würde man auch gleich mit access=no/private taggen)
Ich kenne keine Tore die "diagonal" über den Schnittpunkt von drei Wegen gehen und alle drei gleichzeitig versperren. So ein Tor ist immer quer eines einzigen Weges errichtet und sperrt dann alles dahinterliegende. Das muss man natürlich etwas idealisieren, falls das Tor unmittelbar angrenzend an den Knoten steht, aber es darf nicht auf dem Knoten stehen.
Gruß, Dirk
jocmap (2023-08-19 09:24:50+00:00): Sry, ich hatte deinen Text nicht genau genug gelesen. Es ist so, dass der Kirchengang („Nord-Süd-Verbindung“) an dem Tor endet. Der Kirchengang ist quasi eine Sackgasse. Es steht da auch ein entsprechendes Schild, den Text habe ich vergessen. Das gesamte Gelände dahinter ist privat - es gibt noch andere Zugänge, die Sry, das habe ich nicht genau genug gelesen. Es ist so, dass der Kirchengang („Nord-Süd-Verbindung“) an dem Tor endet. Der Kirchengang ist quasi eine Sackgasse. Es steht da auch ein entsprechendes Schild, den Text habe ich vergessen. Das gesamte (Kirchen-)Gelände dahinter ist privat. Es gibt mehrere Zugänge, ich habe sie aber nicht kontrolliert.
richard23 (2023-08-19 20:05:46+00:00): Alles klar. Ich verschiebe den Knoten mal "einen Meter" nach Norden, so dass man theoretisch  sich auf dem Gelände zum Denkmal routen lassen kann. Sehe auch gerade, dass alle andern Zugänge auch verschlossene Zugänge haben. Werde dann mal alle Wege innerhalb entsprechen taggen. Dann versteht man das auch visuell.
Gruß, Dirk
jocmap (2023-08-20 04:35:06+00:00): Prima, vielen Dank!
Kovoschiz (2023-07-28 11:18:13+00:00): Please don't add useless `image=` . That's for each branch's photo only. Pictures can already be retrieved from `brand:wikidata=` .
ovruni (2023-07-28 06:04:23+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambios al igual que en los conjuntos de cambios 138837404 [0], 138318540 [1], se han eliminado nodos de instituciones educativas nuevamente para reemplazarlas por vías con menos etiquetas. Anteriormente le he indicado con enlace a la wiki donde hay información sobre realizar este proceso de mover los nodos y ahora lo pongo por aquí por si no lo ha leído:
"Los usuarios de iD pueden seleccionar el área y el nodo y presionar C para fusionar los datos del nodo con el área". Mientras que para seleccionar varios dos objetos puede utilizar la techa "Shift" (en algunos teclados se ve como "Mayús").
Saludos
[0] https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138837404
[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138318540
user_5359 (2023-07-28 08:26:40+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful when editing the map data. You moved the node over 50 meters and connect highways with buildings.I have already corrected this.
Supaplex (2024-05-29 05:25:17+00:00): Revert due to it being a fake bus station

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151971201
arjunaraoc (2023-07-28 09:02:30+00:00): Building layout are not accurate, as for example this outline https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1192789992  could be more than one building as interpreted from Bing imagery.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139115298
arjunaraoc (2023-07-28 09:02:59+00:00): Provide detailed info in changeset comments to help review process.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139115298
Kovoschiz (2023-07-28 11:33:10+00:00): Please use `ref=` for codes. `note=` is not publicly useful.
Kovoschiz (2023-07-28 11:22:22+00:00): Please don't delete then recreate the same shop space. Modify it to the correct status.
tyfi (2023-07-28 04:43:09+00:00): Please let me know if this changed something wrongly. I am very confident it was only an improvement, as there were many gaps and a mix of forward/backward and north/south roles (I changed everything over to the latter).
tyfi (2023-07-28 04:43:25+00:00): This only affected U.S. Route 61 in Missouri.
MxxCon (2023-07-30 05:22:04+00:00): How did you spot William Court mistake?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139115591
CurlingMan13 (2023-07-30 16:45:40+00:00): Good question!  Street sign.  I looked at the Bing Streetside imagery, and then looked at the street sign.  It had "William Court".

I was alerted to it by a nearby anonymous note.
sab27 (2023-08-15 17:51:16+00:00): Hi @장채이  unfortunately none of the buildings you added here, exist. Please only add buildings for which there is enough evidence in the satellite imagery, i.e. look for the expected shadows and shapes. It also helps to check whether the sizes/dimensions make sense: buildings in this rural area are usually no more than 10m long. Some of the shapes you added are more than 50m long and 20m wide - impossible to construct in this context! Please be careful with data you add, as humanitarian organisations rely on it. Many thanks for mapping, and please get in touch if you need help :)
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139115914
arjunaraoc (2023-07-28 07:18:25+00:00): When you are adding a building for a feature (ex: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1192572837#map=19/11.93397/79.83176), it may be better to delete node corresponding to the same feature if it exists as in this case.
Kovoschiz (2023-07-28 11:31:42+00:00): Please don't delete closed shops. They still represent a shop space. Change them to "point". It's desirable to track them.
andrashann (2024-01-15 21:50:27+00:00): Szia! Ezt az utat visszaállítottam, 2015-ös saját megfigyelés és a Mapillary-n elérhető fotók alapján normálisan járható, kétsávos aszfaltos út, semmiképp sem "surface=sand" és "motor_vehicle=no".
nemethtamas (2023-08-07 08:08:58+00:00): Szia!
A módosításcsomagban az highway=secondary-t átállítottad highway=trackre, azaz egy egy mezőszéli úttá lefokoztad a 2527-es számú utat.
Biztos ez volt a célod?
vasony (2023-08-10 19:23:28+00:00): A javítás se lett túl jó. Az utat visszaállítottam eredeti értékeire. A 4 számjegyű útvonalak jelölése secondary függetlenül a burkolattól, és a motor_vehicle=no sem túl jó érték, a surface=sand-ről nem is beszélve. Magyarországon nincsenek homokos főutak.
Ha beírnád mit szerettél volna, talán ki tudjuk találni mi a jó címkézés.
literan (2023-07-29 13:29:32+00:00): дубль. уже есть
empty_child (2023-07-28 08:15:03+00:00): Hello znec,
Could you say, please, why you mapped this road as a track?
Argbjorn (2023-07-28 09:22:50+00:00): Hi, znec. Why did you delete this road? Is it closed for passage or something? I see it at all imagery and strava heat map.
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-18 02:27:03+00:00): Thank you for providing the information about deletion. Thank you for mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139118963
mcliquid (2023-07-28 09:12:14+00:00): Hi, du hast nun zusätzlich zu "cycleway:both=no" noch "cycleway:left=lane" gesetzt. Beides verträgt sich nicht. Es sollte dann heißen "cycleway:right=no".
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139119388
mcliquid (2023-07-28 09:14:46+00:00): Korrigiert in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139125618
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139119388
mcliquid (2023-07-28 09:18:17+00:00): Hi, du hast hier als Oberfläche "pebblestone" angegeben. Dies wird in der Regel nur für Kiesstrände verwendet und nicht für Wege, siehe Definition: "[pebblestone] Kiesel sind Steine, die von Wellen oder Flussläufen gerundet werden". "surface=gravel" ist gebrochener Stein aus Kieswerken, welcher hier in der Region für den Wegebau verwendet wird. Ich ändere es wieder zurück auf gravel (Schotter).
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139119527
eggie (2023-07-28 07:16:37+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback   Gebruik voor openingstijden deze tool openingsuren-tool 
 
http://projets.pavie.info/yohours/ 
 

Nu is de format fout. Alles gaat in UK English.
Het adres 114 heb ik hersteld, want anders komt 114A 2x voor. 


MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-07-28 07:35:12+00:00): Openingstijden aangepast 
Tu-Sa 10:00-17:00
eggie (2023-07-28 07:20:53+00:00): Dag ship

shop=bags_clothes_interior  is geen valide tag.
Kies hier even wat het meest in de buurt komt.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-07-28 07:22:49+00:00): Tip kijk in de wiki bij opening_hours
Op Afspraak is geen valide tag. 
Dat werkt niet. 
Laat desnoods die regel  opening_hours gewoon weg.
empty_child (2023-07-28 08:11:14+00:00): КузнецовСС, добрый день
Не создавайте, пожалуйста, копии существующих на карте объектов
Kovoschiz (2023-07-28 11:27:23+00:00): Please be careful not to change the whole area.
eggie (2023-07-28 07:37:33+00:00): Hoi Mitsjol..
Je vraagt feedback .. 
Lijkt mij oke zo.
Groet
eggie
Mitsjol (2023-07-28 07:40:02+00:00): Is het gebruikelijk om ook de teksten van informatieborden toe te voegen?
eggie (2023-07-28 08:05:59+00:00): Het kan.....  maar het is niet gebruikelijk.  Een omschrijving lijkt me beter.
Bij memorials zie je wel inscription=
Maar dat is dan een andere insteek.
Groet
eggie
aixbrick (2023-07-28 13:37:50+00:00): Hello,
no, the road is not under renovation, it's only closed because the "Haarbachtalbrücke" (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/455182334) is damaged. The motorway maybe will be reopened to cars up to the planned rebuilt of the bridge. Please respect the tagging made by the local community.
Reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139135950.
Regards
tony-karos (2023-07-28 13:57:42+00:00): Hi aixbrick,
Sorry for the inconvenience my edit was indeed too large. Does marking the bridge section (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/35341296) with highway=construction would be ok ? the access:conditional tag is insufficient for routing engines to consider this road closed to traffic Graphhopper, OSRM and Valhalla all goes through it (eg. https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_valhalla_car&route=50.7838%2C6.1265%3B50.7978%2C6.1514)
tony-karos (2023-07-28 14:03:29+00:00): From OSM wiki about "Tag:highway=construction": This tag is used together with construction=* for any type of highway, including roads, tracks and paths, currently under construction and impassable by the traffic it is intended for
aixbrick (2023-07-28 14:38:56+00:00): "highway=construction" will be OK when construction starts (in January). Maybe those routing engines do not support https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Conditional_restrictions? You should contact the mantainer.
tony-karos (2023-07-28 14:45:07+00:00): Actually it got reported to me that one side of this road is already closed to traffic. Is that wrong ? this is the edit I made for the bridge section : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139137827