piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
marc__marc (2025-04-21 23:28:31+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1170556283/history
Merci pour ces améliorations.
Cependant qu'est-ce qui te fait penser que l'opérateur est  Mobilygreen  et non EVlink ?
PS: osmose n'est pas une source, c'est juste un outil, au même titre de iD ou josm.
j'ai l'impression que tu as bêtement appliqué les propositions nsi sans aucune réflexion.
Mobilygreen   est un opérateur et aussi la marque commerciale du réseau
EVlink est un modèle de borne du fabriquant Schneider Electric
Cordialement,
Marc
Glassman (2025-02-09 18:46:16+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162262144
Hinkolas (2025-02-07 22:01:34+00:00): Als was wird ein Gebäude eingetragen welches zu Teilen privat und geschäftlich genutzt wird?
Tomas Straupis (2025-02-08 13:49:16+00:00): Visos šitos „pievos“ realiai yra biržės, kurios, žinant ortofoto datą, jau seniausiai užaugusios nors ir mažais, bet medžiais. Čia tikrai ne pievos.
jcarlson (2025-02-13 22:28:32+00:00): keep an eye on your changeset comments. this isn't really work associated with the osmus task, it's address / entrance mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162262639
eggie (2025-02-08 07:33:50+00:00): Dag Steven..  Het kruispunt heb ik uit de knoop gehaald en het bord daarvan losgemaakt. 
Je kunt het bord evt naar de juiste plek schuiven, maar niet aan de weg vastmaken svp.

MVG
eggie
Unarmored5156 (2025-02-09 22:54:52+00:00): Hi there, and welcome to OSM :)

I noticed you added the neighborhood name Cedarbrae to the entire residential area. A node and relation already existed for this: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/196430821 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18462890
As well, the residential area doesn't encompass the whole bounds of the neighborhood itself. As such, I've gone ahead and reverted this change for you.
grzegorz75jan (2025-02-08 01:49:52+00:00): Zastanawiam się dlaczego ktoś z dłuższym stażem i mający trochę edycji pokasował sporo budynków a na to miejsce wstawił zupełnie nowe niby z lepszym obrysem ale nawet jeżeli robiłeś to wtyczką to nie muszę tłumaczyć jak zrobić to po ludzku. Niektóre obrysy były względnie świeże ale bez refleksji wywaliłeś obrysy które robił kutomba_mfumo lub jego obrysy z 2013r. zostały wykorzystane do nowszych budynków. Tak się nie robi. Przywróć to co niepotrzebnie poleciało albo wycofaj całą edycję jeżeli tak wygodniej.

Od jakiegoś czasu przynajmniej przeglądam ten obszar i gdzie nie kopię to wszędzie ślady ogromnego nakładu właśnie po kutomba_mfumo od dawna nieaktywnego ale działał co najmniej od 2012r i natłukł obiektów w czasach cięższych edycyjnie gdzie bo dopiero się uczyli, mieli kiepskie podkłady, mniej narzędzi i to takich które znakomitą część pracy wykonują automatycznie.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162263112
Teiron (2025-02-08 11:29:29+00:00): Rzeczywiście widzę że popełniłem błąd na ulicy Jarzynowej - wartość building=terrace była lepsza. Jednakże nie są to budynki dodane przez kutomba_mfumo.

Co do budynków wykonanych przez kutomba_mfumo (w liczbie 3 sztuk) jaki jest cel zachowywania tej historii?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162263112
grzegorz75jan (2025-02-08 11:41:27+00:00): W większości patrząc po dyskusjach w OSM spotykałem się z tym by tam gdzie się da przerabiać istniejące obiekty oraz nie usuwać ich w celu zachowania historii. Nie wnikałem  dogłębniej. Tam, gdzie się dało i nie wiązało się to z jakimś nadmiernym wysiłkiem. Wrzuciłem zagadnienie na forum i otrzymałem jedną odpowiedź z której wynika, że Polacy nic się nie stało. Jeżeli tak to po sprawie.

W tagowanie budynków nie wnikałem a jeżeli nawet było by deko gorsze to jest łatwy do poprawy, przeklikania problem a temat historii z mojej strony wydaje się już bezprzedmiotowy. 

W każdym razie dzięki za odpowiedź.
grzegorz75jan (2025-02-08 02:30:36+00:00): W tej edycji chyba coś się niedobrego porobiło z obszarami zagospodarowania. Sam też mam na nie alergię ale teraz to jakoś dziwnie po skosie, po budynkach przechodzi i nie wnikałem ale mądre iD mogło stworzyć nową relację.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162263304
AngocA (2025-02-09 04:55:49+00:00): Hola Antonio

He visto que has estado mapeando ríos y quebradas, esto está muy bien.
Sin embargo, quería decirte que los flujos de agua (waterway) se deben conectar entre ellos, y no conectar un waterway a un natural water (los bordes de los ríos). Se deben conectar entre sí para representar el flujo del agua. Por lo tanto un afluyente debe conectarse al río que llega, al centro de este.

Vi un par errores en: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1357888146/history y https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1357888147/history#map=16/2.28524/-73.87607&layers=N
Aquí puedes ver la corrección.

Gracias,

Andrés Gómez
NeisBot (2025-02-08 08:06:03+00:00): Hi الهلالي قسورة العرب, thank you for your contribution to the OSM project.

Over your latest stretch of time, you've made at least 51 changesets with minimal or no meaningful comments.

To enhance collaboration, please consider using the comment field to describe your map changes. This helps others understand and follow your adjustments more easily. You can find guidance on good changeset comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 

Thanks!

I've also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
woodpeck_repair (2025-02-07 22:53:32+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 162259686, 162259858, 162259905, 162259995, 162260546, 162260694.
Jrachi (2025-02-13 08:32:11+00:00): Qui hai creato due relazioni che sono una all'interno dell'altra.
Anche iD dovrebbe segnalare l'errore al caricamento.
Lo sistemo io, tu fai attenzione per il futuro

Ivo
Zatigem (2025-02-11 19:19:39+00:00): Please do not publish a set of changes too big like this. You should publish changes for each town at most... So it does not appear on the history of the whole world... I'm from France and I saw your modifications...
gscscnd (2025-02-08 10:10:53+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12566502055
Nie łączymy węzłów dróg i obszarów zagospodarowania przestrzennego. Segment highway=footway łączący chodnik z węzłem przejścia dla pieszych powinien mieć footway=crossing zamiast footway=sidewalk.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8397098543
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12566502078
Segment przechodzący przez przejście powinien mieć footway=crossing. Czy to drugie przejście nie powinno mieć crossing:markings=zebra?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1357891918
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1357891917
Zbędna nazwa opisowa (name=Chodnik do usunięcia).
olo81 (2025-02-08 10:08:03+00:00): Dróg dojazdowych nie nazywamy. Nazywamy tylko te drogi które mają nazwy. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Znakowanie_dr%C3%B3g_w_Polsce#Nazewnictwo_ulic
Exe19 (2025-02-10 11:25:35+00:00): Te drogi mają nazwy:
https://polska.geoportal2.pl/map/www/mapa.php?link=C6DE8C7081AD2
olo81 (2025-02-11 07:55:11+00:00): Na geiportalu często drogi dojazdowe mają nazwy więc nie traktował bym go jako wyroczni. Często też są drogi których w ogóle nie ma w terenie. 
Najlepiej sprawdzać czy jest tabliczka z nazwą przy drodze.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-20 14:04:58+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12566554508 - what is represented by this object?

is it a duplicate of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/22694240 ?

office of a school director?

something else?
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-08 07:17:31+00:00): #seo #spam ?
DaveF (2025-02-18 10:44:00+00:00): Hi
The station's network is National Rail.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/21468573
Tomas09 (2025-02-07 23:56:08+00:00): What does area draft 1 mean? giving changesets a proper comment is very useful for if people ever look at the changeset to be able to know what changed (:
HDunn (2025-05-15 06:47:16+00:00): Hey, all these power towers you added are already mapped as power poles for an existing minor power line. I recommend reverting this changeset
SafwatHalaby (2025-05-15 07:03:10+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166288275
NeisBot (2025-02-08 08:06:03+00:00): Hi magritte21, thank you for your contribution to the OSM project.

Over your latest stretch of time, you've made at least 95 changesets with minimal or no meaningful comments.

To enhance collaboration, please consider using the comment field to describe your map changes. This helps others understand and follow your adjustments more easily. You can find guidance on good changeset comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 

Thanks!

I've also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-17 01:27:27+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165050719
Glassman (2025-02-09 18:48:28+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162265402
Glassman (2025-02-09 18:48:57+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162265495
FroschForscher (2025-02-08 08:30:00+00:00): Hallo Elly11111111 willkommen bei OSM,
darf ich fragen wieso du die Wege hier gelöscht hast? Insbesondere die Unterbrechung im Funkenweg?

FroschForscher
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162265508
DD1GJ (2025-02-08 22:00:26+00:00): Revert aller Änderungen von Elly11111111, Keine vernünftigen Änderungssatzkommentare, verschobenes Haus, gelöschte Wege und Treppen
DD1GJ (2025-02-08 22:00:02+00:00): Revert aller Änderungen von Elly11111111, Keine vernünftigen Änderungssatzkommentare, verschobenes Haus, gelöschte Wege und Treppen
AntMadeira (2025-02-08 15:33:37+00:00): OLá, RazorWind.
Duas coisas rápidas acerca destas alterações que fizeste no SMM:
- não seria de usar a etiqueta highway=busway?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dbusway
- Não deveriam ser duas lanes em vez de uma?

Cumprimentos,
António Madeira.
RazorWind (2025-02-11 00:23:39+00:00): Olá, AntMadeira.
Tens razão, essa etiqueta (que desconhecia) é mais adequada. Em relação ao número de lanes, a maioria do percurso é em via única, exceto em algumas estações e outras zonas específicas que permitem o cruzamento de autocarros.
AntMadeira (2025-02-11 15:57:38+00:00): Ah, ok. Pelas imagens, pensei que teria duas vias em todo o percurso. Obrigado por remapeares esta linha.
Sou daqueles sortudos que a percorreram na automotora, e que linda ela era...

Abraço!
caseywittmier (2025-02-08 02:14:49+00:00): As well as East Tidewater Road.
FajrAl (2025-02-09 14:21:18+00:00): Halo Pak Farras. Beberapa waktu lalu sebenarnya saya minta seseorang untuk menghapus wilayah BSD. Rencana saya mau bikin relasi BSD berdasarkan yang telah dikembangkan (eksisting). Seperti kawasan BSD Grand CBD, Kawasan Taman Tekno, Perumahan Mozia, Perumahan The Icon, Perumahan (nama), Kawasan A, B, dsb. Seperti yang diketahui sebenarnya terdapat beberapa permukiman terjepit alias enclave yang bukan bagian dari BSD. Jadi kawasan BSD dalam relasi ini bisa lebih tersegmentasi daripada garis agregat. Bagaimana pandapatmu?
Farras (2025-02-09 23:50:12+00:00): Halo, mas Fajar. Justru ini yang sedang saya selesaikan beberapa hari terakhir. Permukiman terjepit ini memang sepatutnya dijadikan disertakan di dalam relation dengan value "inner" (sama seperti komplek Medang Lestari di dalam relation Gading Serpong). Hari ini bisa lah saya upload. Terima kasih atas perhatiannya dan kesabarannya. :)
Farras (2025-02-10 03:46:30+00:00): Relasinya sudah diperbarui: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162334672
wireguy (2025-02-08 12:47:09+00:00): Sansom and 4th crossing has a surface of concrete?  but 4th has a surface of asphalt.
Mark Dominus (2025-02-08 15:22:57+00:00): The tram runs on a wide concrete strip in the middle of 40th Street.  The crossing has asphalt, then concrete, then asphalt.  I didn't see an option to tag the surface as mixed materials so I had to choose one.  I picked concrete because I guessed that concrete would be more of a hazard to the blind of wheelchair-bound, should it fall into disrepair.

I would be grateful for your advice about how to handle this sort of thing.
wireguy (2025-02-08 22:02:39+00:00): I think the railway=tram was accidently changed to a manmade=pipeline.  As for the crossing, I think should either be surface asphalt, or cut it into three sections, two asphalt and one concrete .  Also, the intersection of the crossing with the tram should be a node, railway=tram_level_crossing
s777n (2025-02-08 20:31:37+00:00): Здравствуйте. Вы продублировали Чижики. Кто-то уже успел их добавить до вас.
Один: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10186653922
Второй: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12563423981

Исправил.

В organic maps они попадут со следующим обновлением карт.
Glassman (2025-02-08 17:07:59+00:00): How did you ever find this building?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162267146
OddlyAngled (2025-02-08 19:26:26+00:00): by accident, I was looking for evidence of the old trail above the mine and saw this on satellite imagery. the building is outlined on the old USGS quads too, probably an easier place to start.
MinhQuannema (2025-02-08 03:44:14+00:00): wow
NeisBot (2025-02-08 03:52:37+00:00): Hi kdev0001, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 1 highway(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=162267304
user_22473924 (2025-02-08 03:54:44+00:00): Confirm as intentional
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-02-08 04:48:30+00:00): Thank you
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162267304
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-02-14 23:04:30+00:00): Please don't add fake names
schobbish (2025-02-24 04:43:40+00:00): thanks yeah I think that's a good add
pdxrider (2025-03-21 21:22:37+00:00): Hi, I noticed you marked this changeset for review; I took a look at your turn lane tagging and it looks good!
Unarmored5156 (2025-02-09 23:00:26+00:00): Hi there, and welcome to OSM :) I was going through recent changesets in the Calgary area and came across this one. It seems you've changed building=house tags to semidetached_house. Note this tag should only be used in places where there are two separate residential properties in one building, otherwise known as a duplex. I doubt these houses are duplexes, so I figured I'd add this note to encourage you to double check this. Thanks!
TheNightRider (2025-11-20 16:41:35+00:00): Hello, I'm in metro Denver and saw this interesting area. All the aerial imagery I've seen so far shows this as asphalt (you can see the cracks). That would not prevent it from being used. Do you know if the asphalt has been removed?
TheNightRider (2025-11-20 16:43:13+00:00): Do you also have a reference that this is used as the marching band practice area?
Thanks!
TheNightRider (2025-11-20 16:44:12+00:00): Online references are easier to check than having to go to the library.
End0fLine (2025-11-20 16:53:44+00:00): Hello! I don't generally add surface information unless it is something for me, so I have no idea on that. 

As for it being used for marching band, I guess you could say it is an assumption, but it looks exactly like the practice fields I'm used to seeing here in Texas. Example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1324546234/history

Some are more elaborate than others, including football field markings and big circles (for some reason...).

The only other thing I think this could possible be is bus parking, but the lines seem to go in the wrong direction for that.

I am open to new information if you have local knowledge!
End0fLine (2025-11-20 16:56:14+00:00): That was supposed to say something local to me*
TheNightRider (2025-11-20 17:05:42+00:00): Yep, they're both asphalt with parking lot lines (and a few cars), but they  probably rope or cone it off before band practice. What piqued my interest was the green rendering, so I was expecting to see grass/dirt. I think a phone call to the high school would answer the question. :)
TheNightRider (2025-11-20 17:08:34+00:00): OK, in your TX example, Bing Maps aerial imagery shows markings that look like a duplicate of a football field, with circles for band movement. I see some similar markings on the asphalt at Highlands Ranch.
TheNightRider (2025-11-20 17:12:00+00:00): Got to run, but back on this later. It's interesting!
End0fLine (2025-11-20 19:23:48+00:00): Ah! To the best of my knowledge, carto renders all sport pitches as the same shade of green even if you set a color on it. I ran into a cool blue field in Texas one day and thought it would look cool on the map, but it was still green...
TheNightRider (2025-12-04 21:53:25+00:00): Hi again, you were absolutely right! I just called Mountain View High School and they said this was a multi-purpose area. Mainly it's the bus loop (which we might need to tag), but the marching band does practice there. Great info!
TheNightRider (2025-12-04 22:02:24+00:00): Just added a description about the bus loop on the service road ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/580976575 )
Frank Peng (2026-01-22 04:48:19+00:00): Please don't delete existing roads and redraw them anew. I see in this changeset that you deleted a few parking aisles and redrew them from scratch. Doing such things goes against good practice on OSM. It's better to just modify the geometry of the existing roads. In this changeset, you could've just modified the geometry of the existing parking aisles you deleted.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history

Also, I see that you merged a one-way section of a road going around and entering the USPS post office south parking lot and entering the parking lot behind the post office with its adjoining road (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1137326523/history and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1137326522/history). I can tell by local knowledge of this area that the road going around and leading to the post office south parking lot and leading to the parking lot behind the USPS post office is one-way.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162268487
Glassman (2025-02-09 18:51:45+00:00): I don't believe the Burke-Gilman trail is the right street. Can you recheck the address?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162268799
PostaMap_Infinite (2025-02-08 06:42:56+00:00): If you would like to verify: Here's a changeset viewer!

https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=162269001#16/29.6843/-98.4684

You can see which houses I edited, and which boundaries shifted a bit to prevent intersections.
NeisBot (2025-02-08 08:06:03+00:00): Hi 褐色小鬼, thank you for your contribution to the OSM project.

Over your latest stretch of time, you've made at least 498 changesets with minimal or no meaningful comments.

To enhance collaboration, please consider using the comment field to describe your map changes. This helps others understand and follow your adjustments more easily. You can find guidance on good changeset comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 

Thanks!

I've also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
Tatfahren (2025-02-20 19:58:14+00:00): Und wiedermal der Hinweis Hinweis auf "start_date".
diacriticalhit (2025-03-05 16:29:14+00:00): Hi le-go, congratulations on your first edit to OpenStreetmap! But there are a couple problems with your changeset.

It looks like the source you linked puts water fountains at each of the buildings. This is not an accurate way to tag the fountains themselves, as they will not all be exactly in the center of buildings (see TBH and MRH, where the nodes are actually inside the courtyards).

Also, it does not seem like the dataset is freely licensed (I could not find a license on the linked source). It is important that OpenStreetMap does not use copyrighted sources. This is how OSM is able to stay publicly available.

I am going to revert this change soon. Feel free to add the water fountains you know, as well as from open data.
Dimacn (2025-02-08 11:07:24+00:00): Пожалуйста пользуйтесь спутниковыми снимками Esri, они намного новее и изначально лучше выравнены, чем Bing, которыми пользуетесь вы. Bing в наших краях очень старые.
gurglypipe (2025-02-10 18:22:28+00:00): Heya, thanks for updating this construction site in Stainton. You deleted one house (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1187864290) — was that intentional? The foundations are clearly visible in aerial imagery from when it was a construction site, and it seems unlikely that the builders would have built the foundations then not gone on to build a house on top. But it’s possible.

If so, I’ll re-add the area and explicitly tag it as ‘not constructed’ so that other editors don’t unintentionally re-add it from aerial imagery in future.

Ta
gurglypipe (2025-02-12 11:07:10+00:00): I’ve gone ahead and re-added it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162425099, let me know if that’s not right
NeisBot (2025-02-08 08:06:02+00:00): Hi IshikawaJun, thank you for your contribution to the OSM project.

Over your latest stretch of time, you've made at least 738 changesets with minimal or no meaningful comments.

To enhance collaboration, please consider using the comment field to describe your map changes. This helps others understand and follow your adjustments more easily. You can find guidance on good changeset comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 

Thanks!

I've also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
NeisBot (2025-02-08 08:06:02+00:00): Hi TsumugiWenders, thank you for your contribution to the OSM project.

Over your latest stretch of time, you've made at least 33 changesets with minimal or no meaningful comments.

To enhance collaboration, please consider using the comment field to describe your map changes. This helps others understand and follow your adjustments more easily. You can find guidance on good changeset comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 

Thanks!

I've also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
infeeeee (2025-02-15 12:26:58+00:00): Szia! Üdv az OpenStreetMapen!

Egyirányú utcákat nem így kell jelölni, hanem a meglévő utat feldarabolni, és a kis darabnak az  egyirányúságát megadni!

Ezt meg a másik szerkesztésedet is javítottam itt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162534311

Ha kérdésed merülne fel, a magyar szerkesztő közösség elérhetőségeit megtalálod ezen az oldalon: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hungary/Közösség

További jó térképezést!