piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
alexsup21 (2025-07-29 06:08:57+00:00): Cześć. Mam uwagę do linii osm.org/way/1164718250 . W Polsce drogi `highway=unclassified` stosujemy do dróg tranzytowych, więc uważam, że tu powinno być `residential`.
rademalis (2025-08-03 17:01:38+00:00): Cześć Zgadzam się. Poprawiłem.
Enock4seth (2026-02-16 21:29:52+00:00): Hi Abdul Rahman78, welcome to OpenStreetMap. If you are not sure of what you doing please do not just assume and upload to OSM. For example a railway in the middle of nowhere https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1418151613
Metzor (2025-08-15 11:14:36+00:00): Hallo Fabian,

Auf dem Luftbild sehe ich keine Kirche, sondern ein Wohnhaus.

Im Internet finde ich dort die Adresse von einem Chorleiter. Von einem katholischen Chor, dem "Katholischer Kirchenchor Prinzbach": 
https://www.biberach-baden.de/pb/freizeit/vereine.html

Was wolltest du genau eintragen?

Generell tragen wir keine persönlichen Daten in openstreetmap ein. Dazu gehören Privatadressen.

Viele Grüße
Metzor
Fabian007 (2025-08-21 20:08:48+00:00): Hallo Metzor,

Vielen Dank für deine Nachricht!

Ich wollte hier die Kirche einfügen, aber konntest du das bitte verbessern, bitte?

Ansonsten werde ich es am Wochenende noch verbessern.

Aber danke, das du mir es gesagt hattest!

Ich w
Fabian007 (2025-08-21 20:10:08+00:00): Hallo Metzor,

Vielen Dank für deine Nachricht!

Ich wollte hier die Kirche einfügen, aber konntest du das bitte verbessern, bitte?

Ansonsten werde ich es am Wochenende noch verbessern.

Aber danke, das du mir es gesagt hattest!

Ich wünsche dir noch einen schönen Abend!

Mit freundlichen Grüßen Fabianbuecheler
Metzor (2025-08-21 21:43:19+00:00): Aber wieso wolltest du genau hier die Kirche eintragen?
Fabian007 (2025-08-24 12:43:13+00:00): Hallo Metzor,

Vielen Dank, für deine Nachricht!

Ich habe gerade den Namen von dieser Kirche verbessert, wo man bei den Ändeungssatz 170922228 zu sehen ist.

Falls das doch falsch ist, den ich habe es durch JOSM bearbeitet, bitte ich um Rückantwort!

P.S Ich wollte hier auf diese Kirche einfügen, was leider auf dieser Karte gefehlt hatte.

Ich wünsche dir einen schönen Sonntag Nachmittag noch!

mit Freundlicher Grüßen Fabianbuecheler!
Fabian007 (2025-08-24 12:43:56+00:00): 

Hallo Metzor,

Vielen Dank, für deine Nachricht!

Ich habe gerade eben den Namen von dieser Kirche verbessert, wo man bei den Ändeungssatz 170922228 zu sehen ist.

Falls das doch falsch ist, den ich habe es durch JOSM bearbeitet, bitte ich um Rückantwort!

P.S Ich wollte hier auf diese Kirche einfügen, was leider auf dieser Karte gefehlt hatte.

Ich wünsche dir einen schönen Sonntag Nachmittag noch!

mit Freundlicher Grüßen Fabianbuecheler!
mcliquid (2025-07-29 10:27:06+00:00): Grüß dich, du kannst den Eintrag selbstständig hier kontrollieren:
https://projets.pavie.info/yohours/?oh=Tu-Sa%2012:00-14:00,17:00-21:30;%20Su%2012:00-21:30

Wenn es passt, dass sie Dienstag bis Samstag mittags zu haben und Sonntag durchgängig sowie Montag Ruhetag, dann passt alles.
Fabian007 (2025-08-05 15:19:07+00:00): Hallo mcliquid,

Vielen Dank, für deinen Rückantwort!

Ja, das korrekt so, so ist das Richtig, so laut ich darauf noch weiß.

Danke, das du mir dabei mir geholfen hast!

Ich wünsche dir einen schönen Mittwoch Abend noch!

Mit Freundlichen Grüßen Fabianbuecheler
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-07-29 15:15:49+00:00): Great!  Thanks for the update. 

However, We need a capital D in De Lorimier, because it is part of De Lorimier name (a person). Rue de Florence would be with a lowercase d because Florence is a city and not a person and "de" is not part of the city name, while "De" in "De Lorimier" is part of the person name. Weird, but this is how it is specified in Odonymie Québec.
LGloaguen (2025-07-29 16:14:15+00:00): Ah, merci de l'info ; j'avais fais des changements avant tout pour corriger des non-correspondances avec les noms sur les trottoirs - certains trottoirs étaient marqués “rue de Lorimier”. 

“Weird” — I agree, it's different in my country of origin.
LGloaguen (2025-07-29 20:44:27+00:00): Je viens de découvrir fortuitement que c'est une politique typographique assez récente (2001). 

“Détail à noter, en 2001 la Ville de Montréal a officialisé l'emploi de la majuscule au début de la particule du nom d'une personne utilisée dans un toponyme. On écrit désormais « rue De Longueuil ».”
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-07-29 20:51:23+00:00): Oui et en plus l’exemple est ambigu car si on parle de la ville de Longueuil, alors on écrit « de » mais si c’est quelqu’un qui s’appelle Gilles De Longueuil alors c’est « De »!
citrula (2025-07-30 05:01:03+00:00): I have reverted this edit. Please take a look at the wiki page for natural=bay https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dbay

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169700981
rdubs13 (2025-07-30 18:17:21+00:00): What would be a more appropriate tag for this then? 

I don't really see a water=* tag which is suitable. 

Maybe just estuary=yes?
rdubs13 (2025-07-30 18:23:41+00:00): or rather https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dcoastline?
citrula (2025-07-30 22:57:33+00:00): a disclosure before I get started: I'm not very familiar with the minutiae of wetland or coastline tagging. This changeset broke rendering of the bays, so that's why I reverted it.

natural=water represents the area of water features inside the natural=coastline way. The natural=coastline way should go roughly at the "mean high water springs mark". Since the natural=coastline way is at the outer edge of the barrier islands, a natural=water tag is needed for these areas. You can see the current coastline tag here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/440522406

Whether the mainland should also have its own coastline is something I'm not sure of. I recommend hopping in the OSM US slack ( https://slack.openstreetmap.us/ ) or the community forums ( https://community.openstreetmap.org/ ) if this is something you're interested in.
rdubs13 (2025-07-31 19:31:02+00:00): Appreciate the info :)
quincylvania (2025-09-02 17:24:36+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM. Just letting you know I had to revert this changeset since you turned the Dayton boundary into streams. I assume this was accidental. I recommend reading up more about OSM mapping before making more edits. Also, note that the warnings in the editor are just suggestions and it's not always correct to click one of the quick fix options. Let me know if you have any questions!
user_5359 (2025-07-29 07:15:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You can add access=private to existing road, but you can't delete existing roads on aerial images.
citrula (2025-07-29 18:50:58+00:00): Thanks for adding these! I surveyed some in the Westside preserve area but hadn'tt gotten a chance to find the others that you have added.
Chris Bardash (2025-07-29 19:07:46+00:00): Wow! First time I've received feedback. And so quickly too! Happy to do it. I've been to many of these caves but not all. I was given this dataset a long time ago by a consultant or the cave conservancy (don't remember, TBH), and just recently thought to add them after I noticed a few of the others in the neighborhood had been added.
citrula (2025-07-29 21:15:00+00:00): I know that the city of Cedar Park has some caves on their open data portal, but I've never been able to determine if the license of the data is compatible with OSM. Always happy to see another local contributor!
Dodko (2025-07-31 06:50:49+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100903322/history
Mesto nepridelilo adrese ulicu ani orientačné číslo, preto ulicu netreba vkladať.
https://zbgis.skgeodesy.sk/mapka/sk/zakladna-mapa/detail/ra_adresne_body/0/13674241
hedwig (2025-07-28 20:07:26+00:00): Sorry, just realised that my notes of the postcode were wrong. Not sure how to revert this edit.
mueschel (2025-08-07 10:57:43+00:00): Hi,
could you check which sockets/connectors are used here precisely? "j1772" can refer to either type1 or type1_combo sockets.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-07-28 20:21:10+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13032222190

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Benoît C MdP (2025-07-29 07:52:10+00:00): Bonjour VLD299,
Le code de la route en France interdit par défaut la circulation des piétons sur les pistes cyclables. Donc il n'est pas nécessaire d'ajouter le tag foot=no sur le highway=cycleway

Bonne continuation

Benoît
trigpoint (2025-09-04 23:05:43+00:00): Et la réponse de VLD299 est?
VLD299 (2025-09-05 19:45:10+00:00): Hello,
I am sorry I did not reply sooner. Thank you for letting me know about the French highway code regarding foot traffic on cycle paths. This is really helpful information and I will keep it in mind for future edits. I’ve gone ahead and removed the tag I had added in this changeset. Thank you!
TrickyFoxy (2025-07-28 21:23:44+00:00): После того как нарисовали здание не забывайте нажимать Q, чтобы выпрямить его
geo_ozon (2025-08-06 14:34:45+00:00): Исправлено, спасибо!
Camp Shine Official (2025-07-28 20:49:05+00:00): The reason for this changeset is to correct Camp Shine, any side effects are unintentional. I am a Camp Counselor at Camp Shine and so can verify these tags are correct.
Taya_S (2025-07-29 08:13:49+00:00): Reverted edits by sockpuppet account

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169656630
felipeeugenio (2025-07-28 21:36:00+00:00): Hola. A qué se refiere con emergency=yes?
es solo para vehículos de emergencia?

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169636197
Gabriel Espinosa (2025-07-28 21:38:54+00:00): Hola, asi es solo para vehículos de emergencia de oriente a poniente
felipeeugenio (2025-07-28 21:44:29+00:00): ok, gracias
Hufkratzer (2025-07-29 20:03:40+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1418167832 ist ein Reitplatz und keine Reitanlage, sollte mit leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian statt leisure=horse_riding getaggt werden (siehe Wiki).
Der passende Preset ist in JOSM leider nicht einfach zu finden wenn man nach "reit" sucht, aber man kann nach "pferd" suchen und dann den Preset für "Pferdesport" auswählen.
cyankahly (2025-07-29 21:05:26+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis.

ist korrigiert.
Dimitar155 (2025-07-29 06:35:31+00:00): Благодаря за промяната! Все още не е излязло решението на СОС, но предполагам че сте гледали заседанието на живо и доклада е бил одобрен.
Mihata (2025-07-29 06:44:03+00:00): Ето линк към решение № 302 от 10.04.2025 г.
https://council.sofia.bg/documents/d/guest/r-302-2025
Dimitar155 (2025-07-29 06:59:25+00:00): Мислех че е от последното заседание. Благодаря!
TrickyFoxy (2025-07-28 21:22:42+00:00): 👋  Похоже вы нарисовали здание обведя крышу. Но на деле здание прямоугольное, рисуйте по углам крыш. 

И не забывайте после этого сдвигать контур к фундаменту (клавиша M, или в меню по правому клику мышью)
geo_ozon (2025-08-06 14:38:06+00:00): Спасибо, исправлено!
user_5359 (2025-07-29 18:42:48+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/254148856. What is the mean of the tag xinput = list ?
pkoby (2025-07-29 18:56:20+00:00): Thanks for catching that! It's a Linux command to show a list of peripherals to a computer. I'm not sure how it got transferred into here...
NorthCrab_upload (2025-07-28 21:30:56+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13032352964
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/424339742

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2025-07-28 21:41:31+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13032370964
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1199223005

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
grzegorz75jan (2025-08-03 20:51:18+00:00): Pod wpływem https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169693683
Ciężko mi powiedzieć czy tu są małe lub duże litery w niektórych adresach a zweryfikować ciężko bo tabliczka na budynku nie koniecznie wielkością litery gra z tym co w papierach a urzędowe podkłady mogą mieć błąd więc nie mogę powiedziec czy jest dobrze czy źle i gdzie.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169638006
Hypsometric (2025-07-30 19:09:46+00:00): Hello. Thanks for your edits. I notice you have been giving sidewalks descriptive names. For example Warnsley Road Sidewalk (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1418174083) should not have a name. All of the other tags you gave it are correct. More info on names can be found in the wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
Scout Jens (2026-04-03 15:32:52+00:00): Servus, das ist schon ganz gut ;-) 
Aber: Die Tags access=yes und access=permissive kennzeichnen ein Merkmal als zugänglich für alle Verkehrsträger. Dies ist fast nie der Fall, und stattdessen sollten genauere Tags verwendet werden. Für weitere Einzelheiten siehe Wiki.
george1201 (2026-04-03 21:06:35+00:00): Wenn die Zugangsrechte allein mit access=permissive getaggt worden wären, würde ich dir recht geben. Aber hier steht auch noch
bicycle=dismount
motor_vehicle=no
Es wird also schon noch nach einzelnen Verkehrsteilnehmern differenziert. Für alle gilt zunächst permissive. Für Radfahrer und Kraftfahrzeugfahrer wird das Recht weiter eingeschränkt. 

Wie ist dein Vorschlag? Soll man jede Gruppe einzeln aufzählen? Also auch horse, inline_skates, electric_bicycle, hand_cart, ... und was sonst noch auf der Seite https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access aufgezählt wird.
Scout Jens (2026-04-05 07:53:59+00:00): Hm. Vermutlich hast Du Recht. access=permissive verursacht halt eine Fehlermelung  (Osmose Probleme). 
Aber Deine Ausführungen sind logisch! Und noch mehr aufdröseln? Um Gottes Willen; das erinnert mich an Waldwege im Flachland hier in der Nähe, wo ich schon mal snowmobile=no gesehen hatte. 
So muss ich lernen, nicht jeden (automatisch generierten) Fehlerhinweis zu "erledigen".
george1201 (2026-04-05 18:49:09+00:00): Osmose-Meldungen betrachte ich als Hinweise, nicht unbedingt als Fehlermeldungen. Ob was zu korrigieren ist, muss man von Fall zu Fall entscheiden.
So, und jetzt kommentiere ich auch eine access-Änderung von dir, bei einem anderen KGV :-)
rskedgell (2025-07-29 10:05:02+00:00): Thanks for adding these, but please bear in mind that OpenStreetMap's default units are metric, so a maxspeed without a unit is in kilometres per hour. Imperial units need to be specified, e.g. 30 mph, 12'6", etc.

See:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxspeed
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxspeed:type#United_Kingdom

I've fixed this in
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169662189
callum_tfl (2025-07-29 11:49:44+00:00): Ah thank you! Map Complete had a dropdown to choose the units, so I assumed it flowed through - good to understand for future updates.
pavvv (2025-07-29 07:46:28+00:00): Dlaczego zmieniłeś kategorię drogi na unclassified? Unclassified to droga czwartorzędna, a więc tranzytowa.
MarioJ (2025-07-29 15:13:44+00:00): Ok, to może wybór był błędem edytorskim. Proponuję tę drogę oznaczyć jako "droga lokalna". To nie jest droga wewnętrzna, niebawem będzie to droga do szpitala, a docelowa ta droga będzie się łączyć z rondem Sidorowicza. W zasadzie ma parametry drogi drugorzędnej.
pavvv (2025-07-29 15:21:44+00:00): Na razie droga kończy się w polu. Po otwarciu szpitala i wszystkich dróg będzie można zastosować wyższą kategorię.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-07-28 22:21:07+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/426806558

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
pavvv (2025-07-29 07:44:50+00:00): Proszę, zobacz ten komentarz: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146076543#c1223923
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-03-17 19:56:34+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13032418055/history has shop = printing_and_photocopying that was added in this edit
shop=printing_and_photocopying ? What kind of shop, if any is here? Is it intentionally used instead of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=copyshop ? If yes, what is the difference? Should we document this shop value as distinct, valid and useful?
Redprintblueprint (2025-07-29 18:53:45+00:00): There's also one on the North end of Corrales Road somewhere between Camino de Corrales del Norte and Rio Vista Drive NE
borticus (2025-07-29 21:38:24+00:00): @Redprintblueprint I figured there had to be another one somewhere along Corrales Road, they seem to be set up in pairs/triplets to catch all entry into a specified area. I bet there's one on the south end as well, I just haven't headed out there to confirm either's location, but once I do I will add to the map.
Redprintblueprint (2025-08-18 16:12:05+00:00): Hi again! This may be of interest to you: yesterday I spotted another camera between E La Entrada and Hansen Rd. It wasn't like the other two license plate readers we've seen. I've yet to find the one on the Southern end of Corrales, but it continues to be a fun little hunt.
borticus (2025-08-18 16:24:07+00:00): @Redprintblueprint interesting, thanks for the tip! If you would like, feel free to add it to the map - I'm currently focusing on Flock Safety cameras in my mapping quest, trying to decide how wide I want to cast my net but driving around makes me think it would be very difficult to keep up with every single camera. Would appreciate the help! I have not found the Flock camera on the south side of Corrales yet either, the placement of these two I have added to the map and the apparent lack of one on the south side of Corrales almost makes me think its Rio Rancho running these, not Corrales, especially since the one on the north side faces to the west, tracking those leaving Corrales. Not sure...
NorthCrab_upload (2025-07-28 22:41:06+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Żniwna":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1009184142
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1009184143
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1009184144
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1009184145
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1021233996

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
𝙢𝙖𝙧𝙖𝙯𝙯𝙚𝙧 ദ്ദി ᗜˬᗜ✧ (2025-08-28 08:50:28+00:00): Hej!
Zauważyłem twoją zmianę po dopiero jakimś czasie, ale...

Osiedle Przylesie (Drezdenko) to teren prywatny, nie miejski. Service było poprawne.
Drogi proponowane przy ul. Dębowej są w planach, więc kwalifikuje się to jako usuwanie danych.
theDM (2025-08-28 08:53:59+00:00): O które drogo chodzi dokładniej i masz jakieś źródła, że to ma być budowane?
theDM (2025-08-28 08:58:55+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171121592
Chodzi Ci o to, co naniosłeś w tym zestawie?
𝙢𝙖𝙧𝙖𝙯𝙯𝙚𝙧 ദ്ദി ᗜˬᗜ✧ (2025-09-01 09:11:01+00:00): Tak.
user_5359 (2025-07-29 18:08:46+00:00): Hello! Please habe a look on http://www.osm.org/node/13032443404. What is the mean of the tag mound = yes?
GPYes (2025-07-28 22:54:20+00:00): Correction: Comment is "Adjusted street name from Rua Conseza to Rua Palermo based on Maps user feedback in Nova Piam. #adt"
silversurfer83 (2025-07-29 14:27:09+00:00): Hi

surface=pebblestone sieht folgendermaßen aus:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/77/Pebbleswithquarzite.jpg

Bist du dir sicher, dass Hinterm Berge so aussieht?

check mal 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:surface

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169641066
LordGarySugar (2025-08-02 12:47:36+00:00): Hi, I have some concerns about the tagging in this changeset, why is every building tagged building=house when https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1418184679 is clearly apartments, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1418184682 is a garage(s) and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1418184839 is an industrial building of sorts? Plus all the unsplit terraces that are also tagged as building=house and places where tunnel=building_passage hasn't been added appropriately like here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1418184877
woodpeck (2025-08-02 16:46:26+00:00): Thank you for pointing this out. I had mistakenly assumed that my JOSM building plugin was set to the generic building=yes and not building=house which is obviously way too specific. I'll change that, and also review the few other buildings I've traced this past week. Regarding the unsplit terraces, I didn't feel aerial imagery was giving me enough information to correctly determine how many sections there are, but of course, again, they should have been building=yes and not building=house.
woodpeck (2025-08-03 20:46:19+00:00): I have fixed the building=house issue now. As for the tunnel=building_passage, I was uncomfortable with taking that guess from imagery. Would you prefer an out-of-country armchair mapper like me to (a) take a guess or (b) when in doubt, just don't trace the building at all? I don't mind much either way. I can also (c) find somewhere else to map if this is something you were planning to work on.
user_5359 (2025-07-29 18:41:44+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/13032509009. What is the mean of the tag 宮前 = 宮本?
fortera_au (2025-07-29 00:25:07+00:00): Hi Brareu68, phone numbers need to be formatted in a certain way on OSM, for landlines it will be +61 8 8595 5796 for this one, and an example for mobiles would be +61 412 345 678.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169642493
user_5359 (2025-07-29 06:46:48+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice we use the key highway for type of street, path, way, track, ..
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-04-01 10:25:46+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/350620649 - what you mean by ram=yesv here?

Are there steps here with ramp ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ramp ) ?
nickvet419 (2026-04-01 18:33:39+00:00): fixed.  thanks for the heads up
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-04-01 21:59:37+00:00): And thanks for fix and for mapping in general!
Yui2 (2025-08-04 06:34:17+00:00): 不要在地图中上传不存在的东西，自用的就留在本地
ralley (2025-08-07 00:38:45+00:00): Please do not use GSV as a source for OSM edits - it is expressly forbidden in their terms of service, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169644353
NeisBot (2025-07-29 03:02:34+00:00): Hi Darkfoe703, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
No primary map features!?

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=169645672
Darkfoe703 (2025-08-03 05:25:46+00:00): 100% intentional
pitscheplatsch (2025-08-08 16:03:12+00:00): Thank you for your private message and confirming that your deletions were intentional.
mapstothestars (2025-07-29 03:10:15+00:00): oooops, meant west 50th terrace
citrula (2025-07-29 18:59:21+00:00): Thanks for your contribution. The roads you added were not connected to the adjacent road network, so I fixed that for you. We also use the expanded suffixes for names ("Trl" should be "Trail").

Happy mapping!
emersonveenstra (2025-07-30 15:15:12+00:00): Hey there,

Can you double check https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1118190671, i feel like making that a cycleway was a mistake?