piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2024-06-05 10:36:25+00:00): Hi CV3X, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1289614332

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
Kamil Kalata (2024-06-05 12:07:27+00:00): Zmiana została wycofana (powód: fikcyjne dane) (patrz: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152284938)
Kamil Kalata (2024-06-05 12:07:31+00:00): Zmiana została wycofana (powód: fikcyjne dane) (patrz: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152284938)
Kamil Kalata (2024-06-05 12:07:35+00:00): Zmiana została wycofana (powód: fikcyjne dane) (patrz: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152284938)
Jordi MF (2024-06-05 22:22:14+00:00): El IGN no es la única fuente de la que "bebe" OpenStreetMap.
aseidel (2024-06-05 14:27:30+00:00): Liebe:r mschoene,
bitte auf Typos achten (sourface/onewy).
Danke und herzliche Grüße
Antje Seidel
#lgmaps
Aleksandar Matejevic (2024-06-05 11:19:31+00:00): Hi Ksusha Zhegolko, 
I saw that you changed administrative to economic boundary. Can you describe why, which source is used to remove administrative boundary?
Ksusha Zh (2024-06-07 10:57:22+00:00): Hi!

I used wikipedia as a source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Administrative_divisions_of_Azerbaijan

Economic Region is an additional part of Republic which isn't part of addministrative divisions of Azerbaijan
Jordi MF (2024-06-05 22:20:46+00:00): Este tipo de comentarios son totalmente inapropiados. Por favor, intenta resumir en el conjunto de cambios qué modificaciones has realizado.
eggie (2024-06-05 15:09:09+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Kamil Kalata (2024-06-05 13:08:14+00:00): Zmiana została wycofana (powód: fikcyjne dane) (patrz: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152284938)
aseidel (2024-06-05 14:32:20+00:00): Liebe:r mschoene, 
bitte auf korrektes Tagging achten: surface=ground und tracktype=grade 5 (nicht surface=grade5).
Danke und herzliche Grüße
Antje Seidel
#lgmaps
Kamil Kalata (2024-06-05 13:08:18+00:00): Zmiana została wycofana (powód: fikcyjne dane) (patrz: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152284938)
Filip009 (2024-06-07 20:43:22+00:00): Zdravím, nie je potrebné explicitne pridávať povolenie pre vstup.
aseidel (2024-06-06 08:31:33+00:00): Liebe:r livtoedt,
bitte darauf achten, dass keine leeren Knoten auf Flächen/Linien gesetzt werden (außer es ist beabsichtigt, die Wegegeometrie zu ändern).
Danke und herzliche Grüße
Antje Seidel
#lgmaps
Kamil Kalata (2024-06-05 11:36:38+00:00): Witaj!
To wspaniałe, że postanowiłeś dołączyć do OpenStreetMap. Okazuje się jednak, że to, co do tej pory dodałeś, jest czystą fikcją, w związku z czym Twoje edycje będą musiały zostać wycofane. Radzę Tobie zerknąć na tę stronę (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Przewodnik_dla_początkujących), by dowiedzieć się więcej. Jeżeli interesuje Cię taka działalność, jak obecna, to od tego są wyspecjalizowane serwisy, takie jak OpenGeofiction (https://opengeofiction.net).
Kamil Kalata (2024-06-05 13:08:22+00:00): Zmiana została wycofana (powód: fikcyjne dane) (patrz: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152284938)
habi (2025-04-02 08:41:36+00:00): Ciao Babbe
Du hast dem Lohweg hier maxspeed=0 vergeben, was nach einem Tippfehler aussieht.
Weisst du noch, was der korrekte Wert ist?
Gruss,
Habi
Babbe (2025-04-02 10:09:29+00:00): Da ist Fahrverbot
habi (2025-04-02 19:11:01+00:00): Dann ist das aber mit `maxspeed=0` + `maxspeed:type=sign` + `motor_vehicle=destination` so falsch erfasst.
Ist es ein generelles Fahrverbot oder "nur" Zubringerdienst?
Babbe (2025-04-03 13:11:57+00:00): Es als Fussgängerzone beschildert.   Velo und Zufahrt zum Güterumschlag gestattet.
habi (2025-04-03 14:57:47+00:00): Nach https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Switzerland/Map_Features#Other_common_Signs und deinem Kommentar habe ich das als bicycle=yes + motor_vehicle=destination erfasst.
bicycle=yes ist aber eher sinnlos, da https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/194463179 unter dem Viadukt durch von Velos nicht befahren werden darf...
TrickyFoxy (2024-06-05 16:01:09+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152294990
aseidel (2024-06-06 09:21:36+00:00): Liebe:r livtoedt, 
bitte bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/77451563 tracktype-Wert prüfen (bei surface=ground kann Wert nur irgendwo zwischen grade5 und grade3 liegen).
Außerdem bitte Breitenangabe korrigieren: "1.1" statt "1,1 m".
Danke und herzliche Grüße
Antje Seidel
#lgmaps
livtoedt (2024-06-06 10:10:51+00:00): Liebe Frau Seidel,

der tracktype-Wert war vor meiner Bearbeitung schon gegeben. Darf ich den dann einfach abändern oder nur ergänzen?

Liebe Grüße 

Liv Tödt
aseidel (2024-06-06 10:29:06+00:00): Liebe Liv Tödt,
ja, bitte alle fahrrad-relevanten Tags, die bereits vorhanden sind, aktualisieren/ändern (nur eben keine Tags löschen, die nicht offensichtlich falsch sind). Zusätzlich dann alle fehlenden Tags ergänzen.
Herzliche Grüße
Antje Seidel
Frans S (2024-06-05 12:38:02+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please correct highways crossing buildings as well. (Use the Validation Tool)
Best regards and keep mapping
aseidel (2024-06-06 09:17:40+00:00): Liebe:r HenBen,
bitte den tracktype-Tag nicht löschen, sondern aktualisieren (Wert war grade4, sollte passen?).
Danke und herzliche Grüße
Antje Seidel
#lgmaps
mikimapbuilder (2024-06-05 13:03:08+00:00): These seems like footway considering it is in the city park, that is the reson I changed it.
MxxCon (2024-06-17 14:43:52+00:00): Hello.
Please note, as documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone#Usage, phone numbers should be separated either with - or space.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152283033
NorthCrab_upload (2024-06-05 11:20:25+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11958195538

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
bxl-forever (2024-06-05 12:38:33+00:00): Hello,

Thanks for adding the gallery but I am afraid you did not do it correctly.

Your edit transformed the whole building as if "Cloud Seven" was the name of the building and as if this apartment building itself was just an art gallery.

I had a look at Mapillary pictures; it looks like the building has 5 floors (ground floor + 4 upper floors), I don’t understand why the building was tagged as having only 3 floors (building:levels=3).
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1039982860682054
I removed that too.

Maybe you meant that Cloud Seven art gallery is located at one of their floor.  If you have that information, we can tag this as "level" on the POI of the gallery.
mapperue (2024-06-14 04:41:22+00:00): Ahoj, je to busta historickej postavy. Takže sa značí ako historic=memorial + memorial=bust.
vmicho (2024-06-14 05:33:11+00:00): No neviem. Ja by som povedal, ze socha, kedze je to osoba. A Memorial je vtedy, ak je to nejaky pomnik na pocest niecoho. Tam bolo len meno, nie venovanie nejakej udalosti alebo dielu, sa mi zda
mapperue (2024-06-14 05:35:24+00:00): Pozri si wiki osm a dozvieš sa o sochách a pamätníkoch viac.
ma-rt-in (2024-06-16 19:04:33+00:00): Siehe Kommentare https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152067936
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-06-09 12:06:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152451710 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some duboius edits.  See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments.php?uid=21627614 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16123
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-06-09 12:06:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152451710 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some duboius edits.  See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments.php?uid=21627614 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16123
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-06-09 12:06:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152451710 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some duboius edits.  See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments.php?uid=21627614 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16123
eggie (2024-06-14 13:27:11+00:00): Hi  alatariel

Gut etwas  aktuel zu machen, aber ist der Name wirklich Tuluur-Radweg auf Deutsch?

Gruss
eggie
alatariel (2024-06-15 08:30:43+00:00): Hallo Eggi,
es handelt sich um den holländischen Namen.
Einen deutschen gibt es nicht.
Grüße 
Almut
alatariel (2024-06-15 08:32:36+00:00): Also "Tuluur" ist der Name.
eggie (2024-06-15 08:33:46+00:00): Hoi..

Es ist schon geändert.

Gruss..
eggie
eggie (2024-06-15 08:35:07+00:00): Nein .. es ist Tureluur 😀
eggie (2024-06-15 08:36:46+00:00): Auf Deutsch Rotschenkel
alatariel (2024-06-15 08:48:56+00:00): Ah okay interessant 🙂
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-06-09 12:06:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152451710 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some duboius edits.  See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments.php?uid=21627614 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16123
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-06-09 12:06:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152451710 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some duboius edits.  See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments.php?uid=21627614 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16123
Layft Greater (2024-06-11 08:28:48+00:00): Is it a question mark or just a typo?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1035212478/history
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-06-09 12:06:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152451710 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some duboius edits.  See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments.php?uid=21627614 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16123
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-06-09 12:06:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152451710 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some duboius edits.  See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments.php?uid=21627614 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16123
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-06-09 12:06:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152451710 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some duboius edits.  See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments.php?uid=21627614 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16123
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-06-09 12:06:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152451710 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some duboius edits.  See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments.php?uid=21627614 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16123
josmougn (2024-06-18 22:03:22+00:00): Salut Antoine
Pourquoi tu n'as pas aimé highway=platform ?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dplatform

Je trouve que ça colle bien pour cette structure : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1226991401
Carto'Cité (2024-06-19 19:24:07+00:00): Tu as raison, j'ai corrigé.
Antoine.
silversurfer83 (2024-06-05 12:30:34+00:00): Moin :)

wie kommst du auf die Eigenschaften für das Tor am Friedhof Buchenberg?

Und das Tor bei Teichmanns: Das hast du jetzt auch mit den verschiedenen Landnutzungsflächen verbunden was eher unschön ist. Achte bitte in Zukunft darauf, dass du nur Dinge miteinander verbindest, die auch verbunden sind. Tore (Barrieren) werden mit Wegen (die sie ja versperren) sowie Zäunen, Mauern, Hecken,... verbunden. 

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152285071
pán Petrík (2025-01-17 21:34:11+00:00): Dobry den, mohol by som zmenit tag tourism=giant_furniture na tourism=attraction? Som uzivatel Locusu a ten tourism=giant_furniture nevidi. Po zmene by ho videli vsetci. Ked nie, navrhnem vyvojarom Locusu, aby v buducnosti zobrazili aj tourism=giant_furniture. Vdaka za odpoved.
grzegorz75jan (2024-06-30 10:17:26+00:00): Chciałeś dodać Hospicjum https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1289637966#map=19/52.20695/20.52721&layers=N
i się nie wyświetla. Pasowało by dodać building=yes a następnie nazwę, adres, kontakt.
grzegorz75jan (2024-06-30 10:22:10+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:healthcare=hospice

Przydał by się też dojazd.
grzegorz75jan (2024-06-30 10:34:38+00:00): Jeszcze jedno. Obrys budynku jest niepoprawny. Nie rysujemy obrysu opierając się na dachu. W większości przypadków możesz jest dostępny podkład, warstwa. W iD po prawej stronie masz opcje. [B] - Ustawienia tła i wybierasz Geoportal 2: Ewidencja budynków WMS. Jeżeli obrysu nie ma to rysujemy po ścianach, podstawie budynku https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:building

Warto przeglądać Wiki tym bardziej, że niektóre przekierowania do pomocy są pod ręką w edytorze a resztę można wyszukać na piechotę.
mapbear66 (2025-04-14 17:48:37+00:00): Hi,
You changed Loch Gairloch, which is how it is on OS maps, to Gair Loch. Other than wikipedia I can find no other source for the name. Everyone knows it as Loch Gairloch. So why the change?

Thanks.
BCNorwich (2024-06-05 13:15:08+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Caroline Place is not a one-way street, it is a no-through road. If it were oneway vehicles would enter but not be able to get out.

The changeset 152286411 is still open so I cannot leave a comment there for you. Please remove all the oneway tags.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2024-06-05 13:20:30+00:00): Hi, That's a strange name for a hospital, could you point to a website for the facility please?

Regards Bernard.
eggie (2024-06-05 15:11:39+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback   Info samengevoegd met adresnode.
MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
SomeoneElse (2024-06-05 12:59:17+00:00): Oops - wrong account - should have been https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/SomeoneElse2
chris66 (2025-04-19 18:23:06+00:00): Habe noch das dritte Windrad ergänzt, Details fehlen noch.
Marcos Medeiros (2024-06-05 13:05:54+00:00): Fixed duplicate nodes, unnecessary tag, land use and natural area and overlapping buildings, nodes without tags, non-specific fixme in Córdoba - Argentina
ivanbranco (2024-07-04 08:51:16+00:00): Hi jjyach,

what's the meaning of operator:wikidata=14603? It's not a valid Q-item value, maybe it's supposed to be a ref=* value?

thanks and good mapping :)
shinyblue (2024-06-05 16:02:18+00:00): Thanks for adding some of the estate. There's more roads and houses that have been lived in for over a month.

e.g. crabtree meadow (a road)

I guess you have to wait for bing/google to update aerial maps?
cehwitham (2024-06-06 06:34:37+00:00): I’ve added what is currently on the aerial photography. If you have local knowledge, feel free to add the other roads etc to the map. Or provide a sketch and I can add? It’ll probably be quite a long time before the aerial photography is updated. A drone survey would probably be beneficial.
shinyblue (2024-06-06 06:51:24+00:00): Great. I dont have a drone. But would a gpx file help if I walked around the roads recording as I went?
cehwitham (2024-06-08 22:45:19+00:00): That will definitely help with the roads. There are some useful hints here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Upload_GPS_tracks 
I've read that it's best to record multiple tracks and then you can draw the roads on an aaverage of the paths to remove inaccuracies.
letihu (2025-02-11 20:38:24+00:00): Hallo,
kannst du bitte noch mal "Am Weiher" schauen? Ich finde die Nr. 5 etwas zu oft vergeben ;-)
rop77 (2025-02-12 07:35:34+00:00): Uiuiui, danke!
literan (2024-06-05 19:42:03+00:00): на дворовых проездах, по ПДД, макс. скорость 20 км/ч
citrula (2024-06-05 17:02:48+00:00): This is a dentist named "Spring Emergency Room"?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152288318
Frans S (2024-06-07 12:54:04+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152288902
vasony (2024-06-06 19:25:53+00:00): Szia!

Körforgalmak nem viselik a rajtuk átmenő utca nevét. Javítottam.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction=roundabout

Tamás
Pieter Vander Vennet (2024-06-05 13:50:35+00:00): This is a revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152208019

I however unintentionally pressed some buttons in JOSM causing this to upload without CS comment
Jakuje (2024-08-31 08:35:49+00:00): Prosim, zavirej po sobe poznamky, ktere vyplnis jako ananym a pak je dalsi den zaneses do mapy, jako napriklad 4278692.
aseidel (2024-06-06 09:06:29+00:00): Liebe:r AlmaKrapp,
bitte vorhandene Tags nicht löschen (außer sie sind offensichtlich falsch), nur aktualisieren (Tag, width=5 bei Nelly-Sachs-Straße wurde gelöscht, habe ich wieder ergänzt).
Danke und herzliche Grüße
Antje Seidel
#lgmaps
divaddivag (2024-08-30 15:04:03+00:00): Bonjour Norbert, pouvez-vous me confirmer que la stèle existe bien sur le terrain? Merci. David
Norbert Galy-Faurou (2024-08-30 19:29:43+00:00): Bonjour David,
si personne ne l'a déplacé cet été, elle doit être toujours là.
https://www.kilroytrip.fr/memoriaux/stele-des-aviateurs-hamars
divaddivag (2024-08-31 09:20:57+00:00): Merci pour votre réponse, la stèle mentionnée sur le site est déjà cartographiée: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11183560564. Je suis passé à coté de celle que vous avez mappé à l'automne dernier et je n'ai rien vu: position et nature de cette stèle méritent d'être constatées sur le terrain. En attentant, je pense qu'il faut mieux enlever ce POI. Attention, Killroy comme d'autres sites similaires ne sont toujours très fiables et surtout les conditions d'utilisation ne sont compatibles avec la licence OSM sans autorisation explicite de leur part. Bien à vous David
Norbert Galy-Faurou (2024-08-31 11:34:55+00:00): David, la stèle est bien là où je l'ai indiqué à la précision de ma montre ous les frondaisons. J'y repasserai dans le moi et vous prendrai une photo si vous voulez...au plaisir
divaddivag (2024-08-31 11:50:55+00:00): Ah c'est cool! Vous pouvez indiquer 'survey' dans le champ source au moment de l'envoi afin que tout le monde sache que c'est du terrain. Pour la photo, je pourrais y aller un de ces moments car je photographie beaucoup de ces mémoriaux et les dépose sur wikicommons comme pour celle de la Vallée. Peut-être que l'on se croisera sur le sentier! Bonne journée David
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-06-09 12:06:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152451710 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some duboius edits.  See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments.php?uid=21627614 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16123
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-06-05 14:42:28+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 148893151, 148893176, 148893184, 148893547, 148893592, 148893813, 148893836, 148893862.
Dimitar155 (2024-07-14 08:33:24+00:00): Hey Andy, I'm restoring nodes with ids 11747281021 and 11747295873. Both of them are present on the Bulgarian geonames register (https://geonames.cadastre.bg).

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153920625
SomeoneElse (2024-07-14 10:14:32+00:00): Thanks
johnrobot (2024-06-05 17:17:17+00:00): Kanske skulle dikten gå ungefär så här?

En väg, för kort för att nå till horisontens kant.
Inte heller var den särskilt brant.
miluethi (2024-06-05 17:02:48+00:00): Hi Eva,

Please square out all building shapes in OSM. It's easy: select a building and press the "Q" key ;-)

Thank you for contributing to OSM Nicaragua.
aceman444 (2024-12-07 00:32:34+00:00): Hi, please do not use outdated Bing imagery in this western part of Slovakia. Use Ortofotomozaika SR.
silversurfer83 (2024-06-05 15:47:23+00:00): Hello Becky :)

thank you for contributing to OSM and the HOT porjects.

I had to undo your changes you submitted in this edit. The building you added in Pakistan was unprobably large (nothing like it in the vincinty) and no available aerial gave the impression of there being anything but something like grass.
Also: you dragged a node of a residential highway in greater London which I fixed for you.

Please take better care when mapping. People trust our work here and it mustn't be hurried.

In case of questions, please reach out.

cheers
silversurfer83
ratrun (2024-06-06 16:20:23+00:00): Hi,

your edits here are of very poor quality. You are adding footways without any consideration on connectivity to the existing ways. This generates lots of error on the OSMI routing view. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=35.27465&lat=37.04146&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas%2Cislands%2Cislands_car%2Cislands_bicycle%2Cislands_all%2Csnap_points%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1%2Cunconnected_open_ends_2%2Cunconnected_open_ends_3%2Cunconnected_open_ends_4%2Cunconnected_open_ends_5%2Cunconnected_open_ends_6

Why don't you tag on to the existing roads if there are sidewalks or not?
Onur Çetin (2024-06-09 06:12:19+00:00): Yes, I am aware of that and they are temporary and will be removed today  since their job is complete. Those are supposed to be guideways so that the roads get repositioned more accurately.
ratrun (2024-06-09 12:59:21+00:00): I saw that you removed all those ways. Thank you for that. But please do not create such superfluous bogus temporary changes in the future. Thank you!
Onur Çetin (2024-06-11 15:17:34+00:00): okay, understood.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-06-04 23:20:20+00:00): The only_left_turn restriction disallowed bikes going straight. 
no_right_turn restriction usually better in such scenarios to avoid unintended consequences.
YuliyaShustava_lyft (2025-06-05 13:52:14+00:00): Hi, Spaghetti Monster! 
My name is Yuliya, and I am the Quality Control Lead on the OSM team at Lyft.
Thank you for your feedback. We implement turn restrictions based on signs or road markings. In this instance, we overlooked the sign "except bicycles": https://drive.google.com/file/d/1LqrJvVb8CLCMDuaUVAN2MId8Ny58Lswq/view?usp=drive_link. We should have applied the turn restriction with an “except=bicycle” tag or added “no_right_turn”  as you did. We greatly appreciate your correction of our oversight and value your contribution to OSM.

Best regards, Yuliya
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152293790
KiloThree (2024-06-05 15:56:25+00:00): How did you conclude this is a signalised crossing? I don't believe the city changed this crosswalk this spring, I believe it still matches imagery and is an unsignalised crossing marked with zebra/longitudinal bars