piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Sakari_N (2026-03-21 12:35:24+00:00): Moi,

Jos tiennumeroa ei ole merkitty maastoon (tai se on merkitty niin heikosti että sitä ei voi pitää navigointiin kelvollisena), kuuluisi käyttää unsigned_ref=* tagia ref=* tagin sijaan.

Keskustelua aiheesta: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/ref-tunniste-ns-paikallisteilla-automatisoidut-muokkaukset/135446/5
Heikki Kerppilä (2026-03-24 10:10:43+00:00): kiitos huomiosta, teen jatkossa niin
Wildsharky (2026-03-25 10:35:44+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:180102221
rajdhani (2026-03-20 00:00:34+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:180133635
NeisBot (2026-03-17 16:30:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13618082915 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Beauty salon"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-25 17:33:24+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180419535
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
CometSeeker (2026-03-17 18:44:55+00:00): Здравствуйте! Принятая схема оформления закреплена на вики, прошу ознакомиться: https://osm.wiki/RU:Набережные_Челны Исправил в 180023966.
iandees (2026-03-17 20:21:08+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2967234874 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180026802, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
Antonino_Faro (2026-03-17 18:39:26+00:00): Ciao, domanda a scopo puramente informativo.
Questa l'immagine che hai modificato è quella presente nell'immagine qua sotto?

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Gioiosa_Marea_-_Chiesa_della_Beata_Vergine_Immacolata_-_2023-09-05_21-00-58_001.jpg
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180018596
gially86 (2026-03-17 18:44:19+00:00): Ciao, esatto,non so perchè la chiamino Chiesa della Beata Vergine Immacolata quando in realtà si chiama Chiesa del Convento
Antonino_Faro (2026-03-17 18:49:32+00:00): Ok, sto modificando la chiesa rimettendo il wikidata e nel frattempo correggo il nome su wikidata, grazie mille
gially86 (2026-03-17 19:04:14+00:00): Grazie a te ovviamente :)
5m4u9 (2026-03-18 06:09:18+00:00): Hola, muchas gracias por mejorar todos los lugares que editaste en Cochabamba! 

No hay mucha información publicada de las empresas municipales y peor sus páginas web...
arjunaraoc (2026-03-19 06:04:04+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check subsequent updates including mine https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180090629
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180019624
arjunaraoc (2026-03-19 06:04:10+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check subsequent updates including mine https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180090629
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180019624
Wildsharky (2026-03-25 10:31:45+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:180045353
iandees (2026-03-17 20:21:24+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4284071571 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180026814, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
EvanSiroky (2026-03-17 17:32:30+00:00): Source: https://southgaterecandpark.gov/wp-content/uploads/Southgate-Facilities-Map-2022.pdf
aTarom (2026-03-17 17:47:52+00:00): Hola, consideras necesario el tag
"unsafe"
teniendo
"hazard" y "danger"?
Se puede retirar?
Saludos
ReyDerayos24 (2026-03-17 18:10:52+00:00): Hecho, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180022488
Saludos
gastromap (2026-04-24 13:25:26+00:00): Falsche Öffnungszeiten eingetragen https://www.rotenberger-weingaertle.de
Wildsharky (2026-03-25 10:32:18+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:180046209
eggie (2026-03-17 18:02:13+00:00): Hoi,

Die inner relaties hebben in dat gebouw Cartesius geen functie. Die horen ook niet bij het noordelijke gebouw.
Het geeft ook een foutmelding.
Zo'n inner is allen bedoeld voor de rendering. Dan is de buitenkant van het gebouw de outer en de binnenplaats de inner. Dat is nodig bij dat CAB gebouw Ik heb ze uit de relatie gegooid op de inner van de binnenplaats na.
Die zuidelijke gebouwen hebben niets met het CAB gebouw te maken. 
Gebouw Solo is een voorbeeld waar de relatie goed werkt. De binnenplaats is de inner en de buitenkant is de outerrelatie. De tagging van de outer staat altijd op de relatie.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Multipolygon_Examples

Hier de wiki hoe de vork in de steel zit
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Multipolygon_Examples
eggie (2026-03-17 18:05:57+00:00): Dat Moes... (mapper Lachgast)  geeft ook een foutmelding.
Daar staan de grasperken in een relatie, maar dat hoort geen eigenlijk inner te zijn. 
Het resultaat werkt wel, want je zien één naam  en dat z'n bedoeling zijn geweest.
eggie (2026-03-17 18:14:26+00:00): Hier je gebouwen in 3D
https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=52.1008775&lon=5.0885698&zoom=18
Als je de juiste hoogtes aangeeft/verdiepingen (building:levels) 
Dan zie je na update van 4F het verschil
73616e646572 (2026-03-17 18:20:01+00:00): De hoogtes zal ik binnenkort toevoegen, ook voor het gebruik via ShadeMap.
rarad74 (2026-03-17 18:20:03+00:00): Yout image gelocation is totally wrong. Please put back that giratory where it was and for fucutre use ESRI Standard or Mapbox  satellite imagery.
Thank you.
rarad74 (2026-03-17 18:23:10+00:00): Additionally there are GPX tracks in order to confirm what i say. So , again do not use vantor imagery on openstreetmap. and if possible use native, veriffied imagery from openstreetmap. I hope yo do not change other streets in the same way...
BakoyeRiver (2026-03-20 13:45:25+00:00): Hi rarad74,
Vantor shows the most up to date imagery as there was recent construction being done in this area. ESRI and Mapbox still shows the old roundabout which has been now been rebuilt to the west. 

Note: Apple has an agreement with Vantor (Maxar) to use their more recent imagery to edit OpenStreetMap, which is not publicly available for editing OpenStreetMap. We generally use the imagery that is already available in JOSM but where we do use that more recent imagery, we always cite it and the date the imagery is from in the changeset source.
rarad74 (2026-03-21 19:24:32+00:00): Hi, I didn't know about Vantor imagery. In Bucharest we already have imagery from summer 2024 and i think it was the most recent...
BakoyeRiver (2026-03-24 13:45:42+00:00): Hi rarad74,
Vantor imagery I used is from March of this year and imagery from September of 2025 shows the new roundabout being built.
BrummsLee (2026-04-18 09:22:53+00:00): Ich vermisse gerade die zweite Hälfte des Wohngebietes... warum löscht Frau hier das landuse=residential vom Stadtgebiet?
Hab es wiederhergestellt...
Sylabowy Kot (2026-03-18 16:25:13+00:00): Jak coś, to natural=wood dałem dlatego, że projektanci mieli założenie nadać temu miejscu klimat lasku. A ja miałem dodać na dniach note mówiący o tym :x 
https://noizz.pl/design/odbetonowano-skwer-w-centrum-warszawy-sprawdzilismy-jak-wyszlo/g1s9hf3
Ważniejsze było by ujęcie jakoś tego, że podłoże jest położone niżej niż chodnik.
Anas masuris (2026-03-18 17:14:07+00:00): Rozumiem zamysł, ale nadal natural=wood nie służy do oznaczania zieleńców o klimacie (vibe, atmosferze) lasu xd

Jeśli chodzi o określenie wysokości, to chyba ele=* albo można dać krawężnik (barrier=kerb) ze strzałkami skierowanymi do środka
aTarom (2026-03-17 18:51:45+00:00): Hola, el tag
"animal_keep"
puede ser
"animal_keeping"?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Danimal_keeping
en
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1489893816
Saludos
ReyDerayos24 (2026-03-18 15:08:51+00:00): Hecho. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180064596#map=19/39.617201/-3.945008
Saludos
NeisBot (2026-03-17 18:39:47+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13620796882 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Towing company"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-25 23:33:04+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180431467
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
felipeeugenio (2026-03-17 19:22:31+00:00): Hola. Borraste una calle de un mall. Ya no existe o se trata de un error?  y a un café le pusiste el nombre de * Gym. Es un café o un Gym?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180023812
felipeeugenio (2026-03-17 19:36:54+00:00): Puedes unirte a este chat en Telegram. es de maperos de la región de coquimbo, por si te interesa: https://t.me/+40pTOB30_S0zNThh


Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180023812
Eduardo17172 (2026-03-18 19:45:44+00:00): Hola, la via que se eliminó en el Supermercado Lider de Av Cuatro Esquinas todavía existe
felipeeugenio (2026-03-19 21:43:54+00:00): ok. la acabo de reponer. gracias.
rajdhani (2026-03-20 09:21:49+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:180148852
Glassman (2026-03-18 22:29:59+00:00): #TIP: OSM spells out street names because software has a hard time with abbreviations.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180024248
TheRealMattRogers (2026-03-18 23:38:41+00:00): Thank you for letting me know!  I have made the correction on the home address to S 4th Drive.  I appreciate the help for a first-time editor!  :)
AngocA (2026-03-24 16:43:25+00:00): Hola Esnesto
Veo que estás mapeando ríos y quebradas, eso ayuda mucho en Colombia.
Te quería decir, que aún si un cuerpo de agua se llama río, no se mapea como river, sino como stream, debido a que es pequeño aún. Un stream en OSM es un cuerpo de agua que se puede atravezar con un salto de una persona adulta.
Veo que cambiaste varios cuerpos de agua a river, lo cual no es correcto.
strawberryjam4 (2026-03-18 11:54:44+00:00): Hi, you've made two changes here that are quite far away from each other in the same changeset. As a result the bounding box for your changeset is very large.

It's generally best practice to use one changeset for each area you're working on.

I also noticed the changeset comment ("things") is not very descriptive of the changes made here. The comment should be a short summary of the changes you've made.
eggie (2026-03-18 06:43:46+00:00): Dag camelino,

De website geeft een veiligheidswaarschuwing.
Format website begint met http...  in OSM
Voorlopig verwijderd.

MVG
eggie
camelino (2026-03-18 18:17:51+00:00): Dag Eggie,

Die heb ik gemist. Zal t aanpassen.

Mvg, camel
eggie (2026-03-18 18:39:27+00:00): Hoi.. denk dat de website niet valide is.
camelino (2026-03-18 19:28:49+00:00): De site verwijst idd door naar een andere meer recente site. Zal de meest recente toevoegen.
The Equalizer (2026-03-27 22:08:08+00:00): The Somerset boundary is not closed; there is a gap by the town of Clevedon, west of Bristol.
The Equalizer (2026-04-05 23:41:59+00:00): I added the missing way to the Somerset relations - ceremonial and traditional.
urk (2026-03-20 15:25:40+00:00): Hi Stephan, ich habe eben dein disused=yes leicht geändert und das prefix disused: gesetzt. Wiki meint, dass wäre mittlerweile die bessere Wahl. Ein Vorteil könnte sein, dass bei "disused=yes" bei manchen Karten immer noch das Tankstellenzeichen eingeblendet wird, was bei der Tankstellensuche nach Karte nicht weiter hilft. Mit dem prefix "disused:" erscheint die Tankstelle in den mir bekannten Karten nicht mehr.
st3phan76 (2026-03-21 17:07:37+00:00): Hallo "Urk" :)
Besten Dank für den Tipp. Das ist gut zu wissen, dass es so rum besser ist. ThX
crushtheserpent (2026-03-17 19:58:01+00:00): I also removed recently added duplicate info from a Home Depot. Most of the information was already present in another way that is the outline of the entire store complex, not just the building.
aTarom (2026-03-18 14:01:21+00:00): Hi, is "Dels" correct instead of "dels"?
at
"Camí Dels Horts"
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/103024719/history
simple curiosity
cheers
LySioS (2026-03-18 14:18:17+00:00): It's a good question. I used to write "dels", but everytime I come across in the public dataset of french adresses, it's written D.

Since it's a catalan word and not a french one, i don't know what to think. Here, I modified the street name because the i if cami was i'correct too.
bxl-forever (2026-03-21 20:07:58+00:00): Bedankt hiervoor.
Ik ben aan het kijken want er bestaan enkele onlogische situaties.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1489948605 highway=construction zonder construction=* → welke type straat zou dat zijn.  Met motor_vehicle=no + bicycle=yes + foot=yes kan men raden dat het een toekomstig fietspad wordt.  Of is dit de voorlopige situatie tijdens het werf?

Het is aanbevolen om altijd het type straat toe te voegen met construction=* om dubbelzinnigheden te voorkomen.

Groeten.
NeisBot (2026-03-17 20:30:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 7 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1489950078 v1 | 4 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180026996
HantDX (2026-03-17 21:16:06+00:00): Разве? Имеется же в виду Мир как World, а не Peace, значит на бел. языке будет Свет, а не Мір.
ucukor (2026-03-25 13:19:45+00:00): Выглядае як вандалізм :)
Александр Шушко (2026-04-01 20:16:59+00:00): Ну смотрите, пилю проект для Министерства образования, и они настаивают что правильно вот так пишется наименование в перевод на бел язык
HantDX (2026-04-13 10:07:53+00:00): Не вижу причин калькировать название с русск. языка, тем более, что при этом искажается смысл названия.
ucukor (2026-05-05 17:15:58+00:00): У Міністэрства Адукацыі няма слоўнікаў? Шок.
Fraxi (2026-03-17 22:13:28+00:00): 2 неща по тази промяна, свързани с паркингите. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1489951156 и https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1489951153/.
В първия случай е добре да се свърже ул. Иван Вазов със самия паркинг чрез паркинг алея. Ако искаш, аз мога да го направя и да видиш после какво имам предвид. Освен това уики страницата за service=parking_aisle не работи сега (дори и по-общата страница да работи). То и аз в моя промяна днес пропуснах да добавя сервизна улица към паркинга...
По втория случай - можеш да прочетеш https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Street_parking
В случая имаме сервизна улица и отдясно на нея паркирали коли. Тази част от улицата(пътя), на която паркингът се явява успореден, трябва да се маркира с parking:side=separate.  Защото вече си начертал паркинга. Ако не беше начертан, не се слага separate, а друга стойност. А за самия паркинг можеш да зададеш атрибути като ориентация на паркиране на колите и др. Виж и това https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:parking%3Dstreet_side. По подобен начин се прави с улиците и ако се чертаят тротоари. А ако знаеш, че има тротоар, без да е начертан, може да го отбележиш върху пътя с sidewalk:right=yes примерно.
Ако нещо бъркам, Митко може да ме поправи и да допълни.
AlexTopoRO (2026-03-23 09:34:31+00:00): Salut, folosirea imaginilor satelitare de la Google este strict interzisă. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Legal_FAQ#Can_I_trace_data_from_Google_Maps/Nokia_Maps/...?
Folosește imaginile Bing sau ESRI.
Popa Cristian Vlad (2026-03-23 15:04:49+00:00): Salut!
Imi cer scuze pentru informatiile eronate ale modificarilor. Am gresit cand am mentionat folosirea hartilor google. Sursa originala de informatii folosite este o reconstructie fotogrammetrica facuta de mine. 
Data 2026_03_17 este reprezentativa pentru publicarea datelor, insa captura a fost realizata undeva in 2024 si astfel am lucrat in paralel cu basemap-urile oferite prin JOSM pentru aduce cat mai aproape de realitata curenta informatiile.
Link cu screenshot-uri ale modelului 3D aici https://www.mediafire.com/file/ruxs5gpb1ql3rys/Harsova.zip/file
Iti pot oferi si un link catre modelul 3D pentru vizualizare, insa acest lucru il pot face doar in conversatie privata.
Căprar Andrei (2026-03-24 00:39:55+00:00): Salut, mulțumesc pentru contribuții. 
Anulez acest set de modificări deoarece ai specificat ca folosesti surse de la Google. Din păcate, acest lucru nu este compatibil cu licența OpenStreetMap (ODbL). Foloseste imaginile Bing sau ESRI.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Legal_FAQ#Can_I_trace_data_from_Google_Maps/Nokia_Maps/
Daca ai folosit surse compatibile, te rog incepe un fir de forum sau o pagina de wiki explicand sursele dumneavoastra inainte de a reaplica setul de modificari.
Căprar Andrei (2026-03-24 00:40:26+00:00): Salut, mulțumesc pentru contribuții.
Anulez acest set de modificări deoarece ai specificat ca folosesti surse de la Google. Din păcate, acest lucru nu este compatibil cu licența OpenStreetMap (ODbL). Foloseste imaginile Bing sau ESRI.
osm.wiki/Legal_FAQ#Can_I_trace_data_from_Google_Maps/Nokia_Maps/
Daca ai folosit surse compatibile, te rog incepe un fir de forum sau o pagina de wiki explicand sursele dumneavoastra inainte de a reaplica setul de modificari.
NeisBot (2026-03-17 20:39:41+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 16 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/88108240 v4 | 9 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1080244739 v1 | 7 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/9901616138 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180027296
iandees (2026-03-17 20:46:08+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9901616138 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180027566, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
Senihtu (2026-03-31 17:13:26+00:00): Und noch eine Frage: Wo ist denn nun die Firma? Der Node liegt im Kättergrund 4; addr:street meint, es sei die Uhlandstraße 10.
IvaKraljić (2026-03-18 15:00:33+00:00): The wrong and unnecessary tags on the Appleton street have since been removed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180064160. #OptimoRoute
rajdhani (2026-03-20 07:58:17+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:180145399
IvanaŠokčević (2026-03-18 10:55:41+00:00): Fixed 40T/56' restriction to 18T/30' based on street signs. Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180052799 #OptimoRoute
iandees (2026-03-17 21:21:29+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9341246080 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180028848, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
SomeoneElse (2026-03-21 13:10:52+00:00): Hello,
Looking at the Kingfisher Way in Arlesey http://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeMap?relationId=1494247 it's still not clear whether it uses the road parallel to the A507 or the footpath?
Best Regards,
Andy
Adam Edwards (2026-03-23 12:49:56+00:00): I was going by this source of info which shows the path as using the station footbridge to cross the railway.  https://ldwa.org.uk/ldp/members/show_path.php?path_name=Kingfisher+Way
There is no foot crossing of the A507 road between the bus stops (it would be far too dangerous given speeds, there are no marking and no dropped kerb) so I removed that crossing and highlighted the road and station footbridge as the correct route. It doesn't use the footpath along the side of the A507 according to the source used.  Hope that helps.
Adam
SomeoneElse (2026-03-26 13:12:11+00:00): Ah - thanks.  I guess we can leave the extra parallel bits north of the A507 until someone can explore there...
CAM-Gerlach (2026-03-18 05:00:56+00:00): Hi Jon, thanks for requesting a review and leaving a detailed, helpful changeset comment!

it looks like this changeset entirely deleted the driveway and its nodes, instead of splitting the way and tagging it appropriately, as you've properly done in your other changesets. Therefore, I've restored it and tagged it appropriate in changeset 180037317 : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180037317

See the wiki for some more background on why this is avoided on OSM: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property 

Thanks, and happy mapping!
IvanaŠokčević (2026-03-18 10:51:45+00:00): Fixing 40T/56' restriction to 18T/30' based on street signs. Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180052541 #OptimoRoute
eggie (2026-03-18 06:28:28+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback Wegen op eigen terrein mogen gewoon in OSM. Ze moeten wel van de juiste accesstags worden voorzien. access=private was hier al getagd.
Ik pas het weer even aan als toegangsweg. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-03-18 06:32:03+00:00): Toegangsweg teruggezet met highwaytag en name=Eigen Terein / Private Property verwijderd. 
Het is niet getagd als openbare weg.
MVG
eggie