piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Gregory Peony (2025-09-10 02:43:07+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Thank you for submitting a custom changeset comment! Just bear in mind that id you're contributing as part of a project don't strip the hashtags becasue these are used to track proejct stats. You corectly identified highways and assessed their width. You clearly took care when tracing the highways, thanks for that. It looks like you may have slightly confused by the path of the northern highway; this is becasue it crosses a waterway I'd say given the context it's likely accurate enough. You correctly identified a residential area and tagged it correctly; rememeber to add a place= node to mark what kind of settlement it is. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171710706
Gregory Peony (2025-09-10 00:31:14+00:00): You correctly tagged the highway you added. PLease follow the centre of highways when mapping them; use more nodes the more the highway curves and try to keep the line data within the width of the road. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171710746
Gregory Peony (2025-09-10 01:07:20+00:00): The tagging of the highway you added looks valid, but I would continue it southward instead of east becasue that looks like the 'main line' of the highway.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171710798
Túllio (2025-10-19 05:45:52+00:00): Favor usar a imagem de alta resolução disponível em https://map.openaerialmap.org/#/-44.41051483154297,-2.4028925465801296,17/square/2110000221321213210/68badb050568f170e58b5b74?_k=zj0i81 para manter a melhor qualidade disponível
Glassman (2025-09-11 17:57:54+00:00): Is South Grand Avenue (WA27) physically split? If not then there shouldn't be a separate way. This should be corrected asap if not.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171710934
Glassman (2025-09-11 22:27:28+00:00): I didn't hear back from you so I changed the street back to the original configuration
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171710934
Gregory Peony (2025-09-10 01:04:09+00:00): You correctly identified a highway here but it appears wide enough for a car to travel on and could be slightly more accurate. When mapping highways, please trace their shape accurately. Accurate highways aid navigation and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom in so that you can see the width of the highway. The lines you trace to represent highways should follow their centre; so add more nodes the more they curve and click at the start and end of straight sections, as a rule of thumb keep the lines you trace within the width of the highway you're mapping. Following tracks or road markings can help.If the highway fans out into several close alternative paths to the same destination then you only need to trace the median or what looks like the most used route. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171711061
jtracey (2025-09-10 00:53:40+00:00): Resolves https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4888474
Gregory Peony (2025-09-10 01:15:08+00:00): These are highways but please check the width of the highway and check for visible evidence of use by cars when tagging, and consider the context such as the topology of the area; steeper routes are more likely to be paths. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171711300
Gregory Peony (2025-09-10 02:19:35+00:00): See how I tagged them here https://osmcha.org/changesets/171711518
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171711300
Frans S (2025-10-24 10:08:17+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please square each rectangular building with the Q key while still selected.
Best regards and keep mapping
Gregory Peony (2025-10-29 03:13:40+00:00): hi, it looks like you added an invlaid layer tag here please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer to better understand this tag.
mbeyerle (2025-09-10 01:29:41+00:00): This is awesome, thanks CurlingMan
Gregory Peony (2025-09-10 02:22:48+00:00): This residential area could be extended north. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171711940
Gregory Peony (2025-09-10 02:23:57+00:00): When mapping highways, please trace their shape accurately. Accurate highways aid navigation and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom in so that you can see the width of the highway. The lines you trace to represent highways should follow their centre; so add more nodes the more they curve and click at the start and end of straight sections, as a rule of thumb keep the lines you trace within the width of the highway you're mapping. Following tracks or road markings can help.If the highway fans out into several close alternative paths to the same destination then you only need to trace the median or what looks like the most used route.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171712092
Frans S (2025-10-24 10:16:47+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
About mapping and tagging highways.
A schort local connecting road between 2 other roads is never a secundary highway. At best an unclassified highway.
Check the wiki about tagging highways.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Japan_tagging

Best regards
ForestFurnace (2025-09-10 02:55:23+00:00): Thank you for adding all of the path details from my notes! I will look into the StreetComplete app.
Gregory Peony (2025-09-10 02:30:27+00:00): You spotted highways in imagery. You correctly assessed the width of the western two highways but the eastern one is in fact wide enough for a car evidenced by the tracks on the ground. For the puropses of this project please consider whether the highways you're mapping connect settlements; those which don't are beyond the scope of the project. 

When mapping highways, please trace their shape accurately. Accurate highways aid navigation and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom in so that you can see the width of the highway. The lines you trace to represent highways should follow their centre; so add more nodes the more they curve and click at the start and end of straight sections, as a rule of thumb keep the lines you trace within the width of the highway you're mapping. Following tracks or road markings can help.If the highway fans out into several close alternative paths to the same destination then you only need to trace the median or what looks like the most used route. 

Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
custodiankeyy (2025-09-10 19:41:20+00:00): Tüm harfleri büyük yazmanıza gerek olmadığını düşünüyorum. MK Yayıncılık olması bir problem teşkil ediyor mu?
Gregory Peony (2025-09-10 03:01:03+00:00): All highways you added here look valid accurate and appropriately tagged. Tip: check other imagery sources if the primary one has cloud cover like it does here. Please focus your efforts on highways that link settlements. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171712863
BCNorwich (2025-09-10 06:26:19+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I made several alterations to your added footpaths mainly to conform to OSM best practice. There were many crossing but unjoined highways, (footpaths crossing over existing highways unjoined), all fixed. Many places where footpaths joined onto land area outlines, (residential and building area outlines), all fixed. 

Regards Bernard.
jm428 (2025-12-02 01:55:46+00:00): Hi, you probably know this already, but be careful about mapping stop lines as stop signs because traffic lights often have stop lines too, I noticed you had some stop signs at the intersection of Morgan Rd and Piper Rd
NeisBot (2025-09-10 02:59:54+00:00): Hi Pewter10, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Added residential way with attributes"
Gregory Peony (2025-09-10 03:11:47+00:00): You corretly assessed the possibility for a car to use these highways and changed the tagging part way along a highway to reflect this: well done! The highways could be more accurate: enure that the bends in the highwayas are identifiable. 

When mapping highways, please trace their shape accurately. Accurate highways aid navigation and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom in so that you can see the width of the highway. The lines you trace to represent highways should follow their centre; so add more nodes the more they curve and click at the start and end of straight sections, as a rule of thumb keep the lines you trace within the width of the highway you're mapping. Following tracks or road markings can help.If the highway fans out into several close alternative paths to the same destination then you only need to trace the median or what looks like the most used route. Thank you for your contribution.

If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
Gregory Peony (2025-09-10 03:38:32+00:00): I flagged a highway here which should have been connected to an existing one. It's important to do this becasue routing algorythms require that highways are connected to function. You can see how I connected them here https://osmcha.org/changesets/171713965
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171713266
stragu (2025-09-10 04:06:38+00:00): resolves https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4625375
StarTrek2 (2025-09-10 18:46:34+00:00): Please make the buildings squared (right-click on building). Thank you.
NeisBot (2025-09-10 04:15:46+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description
pitscheplatsch (2025-09-14 08:16:45+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/171904635
Layft Greater (2025-09-27 08:12:38+00:00): Hello N3cro1979!

Thanks for your edit. Note: Φαρμακείο = Pharmacy, already mapped with shop=pharmacy. Instead, please use pharmacist’s name for the name tag where possible.

Thanks!

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1287682407
Layft Greater (2025-09-27 08:14:42+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12876824074
mueschel (2025-09-14 10:14:14+00:00): Hi,
you added a 'road number' tag here - shouldn't that be 'ref'?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1391144697
eggie (2025-09-10 06:05:26+00:00): Dag Codarax,

Ik zal de naam Europalaan en oneway=yes verwijderen. Dat hoort ook niet op een rotonde. 
Ook lopen de fietspaden iets anders.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-09-10 06:44:14+00:00): Wegen aangepast conform BGT omtrekgericht en Quick Ortho 2025
NorthCrab_upload (2025-09-10 06:00:56+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7954173664
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/447339479

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
UtterClutter (2025-09-10 07:16:36+00:00): The house previously marked a house as 30 Downsway is actually 571 Falmer Road.
I have corrected this.
eggie (2025-09-10 08:04:26+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Mathias_ADAV (2025-10-02 08:52:50+00:00): Bonjour, dans cycleway c'est bien lane qu'il faut rajouter et non lanes ou bande_cyclable ;)  Concernant la piste non séparé, je l'ai passé en highway = cycleway comme celle le long de la départementale
Raiim (2025-09-10 06:56:00+00:00): Ada kamar kosong ni bang??
ntaa14 (2025-09-10 06:56:28+00:00): ada bang langsung datang aja!!
muralito (2025-09-10 13:36:21+00:00): Hi. It would be very good if there were a legal restriction on pedestrians, but unfortunately that’s not the case. For that reason, it is incorrect to tag it as such.
JudaeanDesert (2025-09-12 09:27:28+00:00): Hello muralito,

Thank you for input. I will defer to your knowledge here and update the tagging. Have a good day.
eggie (2025-09-10 07:13:39+00:00): Dag Erik access=private is voldoende.
Ik heb motor_vehicle no verwijderd van het paaltje. Dat geeft problemen.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-09-10 07:18:25+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Tag:barrier%3Dbollard
Mathias_ADAV (2025-10-08 09:46:18+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai vu plusieurs intégration de chaucidou avec lanes = 2, on devrait plutôt mettre lanes = 1 ? A moins qu'il y est bien 2 lignes ainsi qu'une ligne de démarcation, mais à ce moment là on est sur des bandes cyclables dites suggérées
eggie (2025-09-10 07:31:11+00:00): Dag Werser..

Je vraagt feedback.Het is moeilijk om een met bomen bedekt water uit te lijnen. 
De BING foto is vaak verouderd en ligt er op veel plaatsen naast. Gebruik svp de PDOK actueel of een nog recenteren
Dat water is allemaal ingemeten en dat kun je zien in de BGT omtrekgericht. Wanneer je dat als achtergrond zou gebruiken zie je precies de taluds.
Donkere plekken zijn niet automatisch water.
Waar bomen langs de kant staan is dat niet de oever. Dat zijn schuin genomen foto's en bomen hangen over het water. 
Je het de waterway verplakt met de wijkgrens. Beter niet doen.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=171719580
Je kunt de grachten dus het beste uitlijnen mbv de BGT omtrekgericht transparant.
BGT implementeren 
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59021

In editor JOSM gaat dat makkelijker. 

MVG
eggie
NeisBot (2025-09-10 07:24:40+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
pitscheplatsch (2025-09-14 08:16:08+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/171720751
martin-kokos (2025-12-11 11:17:56+00:00): Zopakujte si proč přispěvovatelé tráví svůj doborvolnický čas přispíváním do projektu pro společenský užitek, a co tam nepatří.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Jak_mapujeme
Vandalizmus na OSM není vítán. Píšu černý puntík.
HuntBehind (2025-12-12 12:19:36+00:00): "Přispěvovatlé"? "Doborvolnický"? Kárání by mohlo mít úroveň...

O jakém vandalizmu mluvíte? Popis té černé stavby dle mého není v závažném rozporu s vámi odkazovaným článkem. A z vyššího principu mravního rozhodně je společensky užitečný. Možná jsem ale tuhle ornou půdu pana Vrátného neměl nazývat jako Vrátnice, ale spíš jako garáž? S přáním plodného dne v udílení dalších černých puntíků.

ps: za statisíce úprav v OSM mě ještě nikdo nikdy nepochválil. Ale stačí jeden akurátní člověk jako vy, aby kvůli banálnímu vtípku, který zcela reflektuje realitu, spolehlivě otrávil můj dobrovolnický čas, který jsem přispívání do projektu OSM věnoval
martin-kokos (2025-12-12 12:34:37+00:00): Přidávám tedy ještě článek o tom, co patří do pole name.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Key:name
HuntBehind (2025-12-12 13:17:28+00:00): Přidávám tedy ještě článek o tom, co patří do pole "obtěžování" :*
https://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obt%C4%9B%C5%BEov%C3%A1n%C3%AD
eggie (2025-09-10 08:07:24+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback Vaak worden die paden weer ondergeploegd. Dat is waar. In principe geen paden verwijderen uit OSM. Wel de juiste accesstags toevoegen. Bv access=private. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Wout Verkamman (2025-09-10 09:05:40+00:00): Beste Eggie,
Dank voor de terugkoppeling en het welkomstbericht. 

Ik zag dat dit pad een aantal maanden geleden is opgenomen in OSM. Voorheen zag ik dit pad namelijk niet terug in apps die gebruik maken van OSM (Komoot, Strava etc.).  Eigenlijk is hier helemaal geen sprake van een pad, maar betreft dit gewoon een open ruimte tussen het gewas ten noorden en ten zuiden van dit pad. 

Betekent dit dat dit soort paden over privégrond altijd ingetekend kunnen worden? 

MVG,
Wout
eggie (2025-09-10 09:12:54+00:00): Nou... een echt pad wel, maar de oorspronkelijke mapper staat bekend om gewoon vanuit z'n leunstoel alle paden in te tekenen en dan helaas ook zonder accesstags.

Hij is al vele malen daarop aangesproken.
Zou het in dit geval weg laten.

Wel kans dat het dan weer ingetekend wordt. 
Zelf zet ik dan access=private op die 'paden'
Dat voorkomt opnieuw intekenen zonder accesstags. 
Je krijgt anders ook ongewenste routes 
En als het alleen zo'n ruimte is dan tracktype=grade5 erbij.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Key:tracktype
Dat is de laagste categorie. 

Mapse
eggie
soliMM (2025-09-15 12:16:51+00:00): Zdravo, molim te da obratiš pažnju kada dodaješ ograničenja brzine na puteve, dodaješ vrijednosti na mjestima gdje već postoje unijeta ograničenja (obrati pažnju na tagove maxspeed:forward i maxspeed:backward).

Ovo kako trenutno radiš je potpuno pogrešno, jer stavljaš maxspeed tag na segmente gdje su već dodati maxspeed:forward i maxspeed:backward.

Da ne dužim, molim te da mi objasniš na ovom kratkom segmentu https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/303052588, zbog čega si stavio ovdje maxspeed=50 (što po tvojoj izmjeni znači da u oba smjera kretanja važi ograničenje 50) kada imamo jasan znak https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=43.72673901666701&lng=19.707311300000015&z=17&dateFrom=2025-01-01&pKey=1514917749891988&focus=photo&x=0.022516483804687237&y=0.6024108614385757&zoom=0
da pred kružnim tokom važi ograničenje 40, a malo dalje postoji i znak 30, konkretno ovdje https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/159164784

Ukoliko je došlo do neke promjene na terenu, bilo bi dobro da obrazložiš u suprotnom ću tvoje poslednje izmjene morati da revertujem.

Srdačan pozdrav
pavel_shturm (2025-09-17 14:10:40+00:00): Добар дан! У праву сте, нисам знао да ограничење брзине може бити подешено у различитим смеровима. Вероватно би требало да вратим промену. Али ограничење брзине од кружног тока према бензинској пумпи је 50 км/х, затим се повећава на 60 км/х од левог излаза и остаје на снази до последњег улаза у град.
pavel_shturm (2025-09-17 14:26:50+00:00): https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=43.727266320832996&lng=19.70768248750005&z=17&dateFrom=2025-01-01&pKey=705515868500922&focus=photo&x=0.4858192363202368&y=0.48862342348702326&zoom=1.0119340551181095
pavel_shturm (2025-09-17 14:28:18+00:00): https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=43.722492125&lng=19.706384620832978&z=18&dateFrom=2025-01-01&pKey=1847312989400037&focus=photo&x=0.4449166279875139&y=0.5109819573833777&zoom=1.0119340551181095
pavel_shturm (2025-09-17 14:31:37+00:00): Извињавам се због нетачности. Мислио сам на ограничења на знаковима на које је горе наведен линк.
soliMM (2025-09-17 15:56:54+00:00): Zdravo Pavel, hvala na odgvoru i ne brini, ispravićemo sve što treba. 

Nekada ograničenja brzina mogu imati iste vrijednosti u oba smjera, međutim često to i nije slučaj, pa zbog toga treba biti pažljiv prilikom dodavanja ili mijenjanja istih.

Ova dva znaka što si mi poslao, ja ne vidim bilo šta problematično u OSM podacima na toj dionici puta. Tako je već i bilo uneseno pre tvojih poslednjih izmena? Od ovog znaka 50 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/289870181 , tačnije od kružnog toka, pa sve do ovog znaka 60 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12489342762 stoji maxspeed:backward=50 na svakom segmentu puta, zar ne?

Uglavnom, provjeriću kasnije sve ove promjene što si napravio na Zlatiboru, a tiču se ograničenja brzina, koristeći najnovije dostupne snimke na Mapillary platformi, i vratiti maxspeed vrijednosti na prethodno stanje ako bude potrebno.

Ukoliko imaš još nekih pitanja ili nejasnoća u vezi mapiranja u Srbiji, možeš da nam se pridružiš na zvaničnom forumu u Srbija kategoriji (https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/rs/64) ili na telegram kanalu (https://t.me/osm_sr).

Sve najbolje
Andrea Musuruane (2025-09-10 09:48:11+00:00): Ciao. Qual e' la fonte di questo nome? Grazie, Andrea
Andrea Musuruane (2025-09-10 09:36:04+00:00): Ciao. Quelli indicati NON sono dei primary_link. I primary_link si usano per svincoli o rampe tra una strada di importanza nazionale (primary) ed un'altra strada con la stessa importanza o inferiore. Questo non e' uno svincolo ne' una rampa. Ciao, Andrea
aboc (2025-09-10 09:50:27+00:00): Ciao, la wiki indica che si possono usare i _link per le corsie che permettono di tagliare un incrocio/una rotatoria. Prendere il primary dalla strada di importanza più alta.
Andrea Musuruane (2025-09-10 09:56:02+00:00): Non e' questo il caso corretto descritto nella wiki. Il caso a cui si riferisce e' questo https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/images/3/39/Roundabout_with_marked_link.png dove la strada evidenziata (e solo quella) che permette di evitare la rotonda e' possibile etichettarla come link. Ciao, Andrea
aboc (2025-09-10 09:59:36+00:00): Ok, la wiki indica anche "Il tipo più frequente di collegamento taglia l'angolo di un incrocio, lasciando una piccola "isola" triangolare tra esso e la carreggiata/corsia", potrebbe essere ambiguo