piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Warin61 (2023-04-04 23:53:41+00:00): Hi,

"Pole 13 Camp" looks to be a group of buildings froming a 'campus'. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dhotel#As_a_campus for a better way to map them.
The track named "Fire Trail" well that is not a 'name' but a 'description' ... see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only 
A similar comment for 'Ranger Station' see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dranger_station

Keep mapping!
osmviborg (2023-04-03 14:31:44+00:00): Hej. Inden du tegner en cykelsti, så tjek om den  ikke i forvejen er tagget på vejen den løber ved siden af. Det var den her, tagget som 'cycleway=track'.
osmviborg (2023-04-03 14:46:00+00:00): Følg gerne denne vejledning: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Da:Cykelstivejledning
DeFra85 (2023-04-04 13:35:51+00:00): Gibt es zu der Schranke auch ein entsprechendes Schild das den Durchgang für Fußgänger und Fahrräder beschränkt und den Weg als privat ausweist?
moosfrosch (2023-04-06 09:03:01+00:00): Eine Sperrung für Fußgänger wäre gar nicht zulässig, da freie Landschaft
DeFra85 (2023-04-06 09:14:29+00:00): Oh ja, genauer hinschauen hätte geholfen, ich hatte nur den BLASSEN Feldweg gesehen und mich gewundert! Eigentlich brauchen Feldwege doch keine zusätzlichen access, da automatisch Fahrzeuge ausgeschlossen und Fuß/Rad zugelassen sind?
moosfrosch (2023-04-06 09:49:17+00:00): Da bin ich mir nicht sicher; ich habe mal an einer kiebitzzählung teilgenommen, da sind wir über abenteuerliche Wald- und Feldwege gefahren, die waren nicht für private Autos gesperrt, und bei OSM wird da auch nichts voreingestellt gesperrt, oder? Höchstens das Routing vermeidet Feldwege.
Patchanka (2023-04-03 17:28:18+00:00): bonjour
merci de ne pas supprimer des données à moins que les éléments n'existent plus sur le terrain. Ici vous avez supprimé une vingtaine d'adresses ! 
J'ai annulé le changeset.
bonne soirée
user_5359 (2023-04-12 05:32:37+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/10781890048 (one of twelve objects). What is the mean of the tag conn = w240668556,n2483805372,n2483805953?
Samwel Kyando (2023-04-13 13:41:07+00:00): Hi 
it is just a bug that occur when importing road data from mapwithai,

Fixed with thanks
user_5359 (2023-04-07 16:39:21+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/212033088. What is the meaning of the tag
desination = permissive_footpath
?
NTTrailsLSE (2023-04-11 11:38:18+00:00): Hi! Thanks for flagging the spelling error (this should have been designation=permissive_footpath). We will update the tag accordingly.
aTarom (2023-04-03 14:35:29+00:00): Hola JavierSp,
gracias por editar,
puedes mirar este tag
"CEIP"="..."
se trata quizás de
"short_name"="..."?
en
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28472020/history
y
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28508142/history
Saludos
JavierSp (2023-04-03 15:53:20+00:00): Hola, gracias por avisar. Lo acabo de corregir.

Un saludo :)
Dino Michelini (2023-04-17 08:29:18+00:00): La classificazione del sito come auguraculum è sbagliata. La Treccani dice che forse interpretabile come un auguraculum; come si deduce da Wikipedia gli auguraculum sono aree sacre romane. Le ricerche archeologiche concordano sul fatto che questo sito è etrusco (no romano) e si tratta di un monumento rupestre databile intorno al II-II sec. a.C. I monumenti rupestri sono tombe a forma di dato dove sulla sommità si trova un altare per i riti legati al culto dei morti. Se si legge poi la voce AUGURACOLO in "Enciclopedia Italiana" (treccani.it)  si comprende la differenza tra monumento rupestre etrusco e auguraculum. Controlla gli studi
•	Ludovica Lombardi, Micaela Merlino e Mirenda T., Il complesso archeologico di Fontiloro: aspetti della romanizzazione nel bacino del Mignone, a cura di Associazione archeologica dell'Etruria meridionale RASNA, Soprintendenza archeologica per l'Etruria meridionale, Tarquinia, Edizioni Etrusca Tellus, 1992 pp. 15-16.
•	Stephan Steingräber e Friedhelm Prayon, Monumenti rupestri etrusco romani tra i Monti Cimini e la Valle del Tevere, Canino, Associazione Canino Info ONLUS, 2011, p. 139.
•	Prayon F., Monumenti rupestri nella Tuscia: tradizione etrusca o innovazione romana? In L'Etruria delle necropoli rupestri. Atti del XXIX convegno di Studi Etruschi ed Italici (Tuscania-Viterbo 2017), Istituto Nazionale di Studi Etruschi ed Italici, 2019, pp. 257-261.
eggie (2023-04-03 14:45:51+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-04-03 14:50:52+00:00): Dag wobbie.. Ik heb noexit=yes (doodlopende weg ) van de Rietvekdenweg weer verwijderd. Net als oneway=no   Svp niet overal oneway=no gaat taggen op reguliere wegen.
Wat bedoel je met ongeldige weg? 

Je edits? https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=134457110

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-04-03 14:53:17+00:00): Je 'ongeldige' weg teruggezet.
eggie (2023-04-03 14:57:09+00:00): Waarschijnlijk ben je gaan schuiven (beter niet doen) met de kaart en hebt de aanduiding doodlopende weg verplaatst naar de Rietveldenweg. Dat routeert dan niet meer. Ik heb het hersteld. 
Mapse
eggie
ivanbranco (2023-04-08 08:39:47+00:00): Ciao Matilde, 

la cancellazione della strada residenziale subito a destra è stata volontaria? E' ben visibile dalle foto satellitati, quindi mi sembra un errore
Strubbl (2025-06-23 19:42:03+00:00): Hi lenz42, es ist der Kreuzbergköpfel und nicht Kreuzbergköpfl. Kreuzbergköpfl ist maximal eine alternative, nicht offizielle Schreibweise. Bitte nicht einfach die Namen ändern, sondern zB. alt_name dafür verwenden. Ich habe deine Schreibweise so erfasst mit CS https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168019183
lenz42 (2025-06-23 20:17:21+00:00): Hallo Strubbl,
ich habe den Namen nicht einfach geändert, der Gipfel hatte seit der Version 2 etliche Jahre lang keinen Namen mehr. Ich habe ihn so ergänzt, wie ich ihn kenne. Im Übrigen ist die Schreibweise nicht so eindeutig, wie du hier angibst: Bayernatlas aktuell: Kreuzbergköpfel, topographische Karte Blatt 8236 Tegernsee von 1995: Kreuzbergköpfl, topographische Karte von 1975: Kreuzberg-Köpfl. Was ist also hier richtig oder falsch? (Falsch ist aber definitiv "der" Köpfl, es muss "das" Köpfl heißen.)
Jetzt ist der Gipfel auf alle Fälle Bayernatlas-konform und das ist selbstverständlich auch OK.
Strubbl (2025-06-23 20:30:06+00:00): Vielen Dank für die Rückmeldung. Und entschuldige bitte, das hatte ich in der Node-Historie falsch verstanden.

Spannend fand ich, dass 1914 es schon mal Kreuzbergköpfel war:
https://www.digitale-sammlungen.de/de/search?query=Kreuzbergk%C3%B6pfel

Die Variante Kreuzberg-Köpfl füge ich auch nochmal hinzu. Dann findet man den auch unter dem Namen.
lenz42 (2025-06-23 20:46:44+00:00): Kein Problem.
Übrigens hieß es schon seit dem Positionsblatt 813 Schliersee von 1900 Kreuzberg-Köpfl - also offiziell. Die Münchner neuesten Nachrichten haben also entweder geschlampt oder waren ihrer Zeit 100 Jahre voraus.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-15 09:47:35+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10781887956

Is it a spring with a drinkable water?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10781952117/history

is it maybe a bus stop?
Brotfahrer (2024-03-19 15:08:28+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/107818879
"Is it a spring with a drinkable water?"
Yes it is drinkable. People where going there to collect water with containers.
Brotfahrer (2024-03-19 15:12:43+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10781952117/history

"is it maybe a bus stop?"

There is a bus stop nearby, but no visible signs of the line or times a bus is passing by. It is a little sheet metal booth, faced away from the road. Probably self made.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-27 18:02:01+00:00): > "Is it a spring with a drinkable water?"
Yes it is drinkable. People where going there to collect water with containers. 

Is it a natural spring?


https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10781928358 - is it actually named "Shop"?

Note that if object has unknown/no name then it is better to set no name
Patchanka (2023-04-03 17:06:53+00:00): bonjour
merci de ne pas vandaliser OSM.
J'ai annulé ce changeset.
https://dane.ac-lyon.fr/spip/bonnes-pratiques-osm-en-snt
ivanbranco (2023-04-08 08:40:33+00:00): Ciao,

su OSM non cancelliamo una way se l'accesso è vietato, ma impostiamo il corretto tag access. In questo caso access=private presumo
ivanbranco (2023-04-08 08:41:02+00:00): C'è un cartello che vieta l'ingresso? Quale?
Glassman (2023-04-04 22:17:00+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.

You made so many edits that I didn't look at every detail but one suggestion. Insteading of trying to use the alley as the address, just skip adding any address tags. (See the Electrical Room)

Also - we typically don't use descriptive names. We try to use tags instead. Not sure if the electrical room is named or not. 

I'll send you more info on OSM in a DM. Keep up the good work.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134458835
living-wage (2023-04-03 15:26:12+00:00): These two changes should not be pushed but I couldn't figure out how to discard them

75156412, v2
886993020, v4
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-27 13:51:44+00:00): Thank you for mapping. The mapping looks great and also the changeset comment. Happy Mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134460054
eggie (2023-04-03 18:14:50+00:00): Kleinigheidje... info samengevoegd met bestaande BAG adresnode.
Je hoeft geen adressen aan te maken in OSM. 
gr eggie.
AaronFitz (2023-04-08 09:13:44+00:00): Hey man! Haven't run this one yet but what do you usually use as a authority reference guide?  Found Rolling Green Road listed in NPT's official town GIS, but it does seem like the addresses are building numbers and not attached to Admiral Kalbfus.  https://newportri.mapgeo.io/datasets/property?abuttersDistance=200&latlng=41.507878%2C-71.32141&panel=selection&previewId=56&zoom=18
ZeLonewolf (2023-04-08 11:07:47+00:00): In Newport I go with what's signed on the ground as they're generally pretty good about putting signs on their roads and it lines up with OSM's "on the ground" rule.  There isn't a sign here like there is for every other city street, so I figured it was more appropriately tagged as the internal road system to an apartment complex.  But feel free to run up it anyways :-D
OSMCowboy (2023-04-03 16:23:14+00:00): Correction: Source used was Maxar Premium Imagery
cartofy (2023-04-04 04:47:26+00:00): Please do not use the tag "motor_vehicle=no". Motor vehicles include any kind of motorised transport including two wheelers. Use motorcar when referring to cars: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:motorcar
sge444 (2024-01-02 19:16:04+00:00): Доброго времени суток!
Не понятно, что это за точка https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6697019786
Видимо по ошибке туда попала?
MxxCon (2023-04-06 05:51:24+00:00): Hello.
Why did you delete all the info from Pita Grill POI?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134460666
Sparks (2023-04-06 11:52:38+00:00): I think because it's not there anymore.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134460666
michalgwo (2024-03-08 00:57:39+00:00): Gościniec Królewski to jest szlak pieszy czy rowerowy? Pytam, bo network=lcn to tag dla rowerowych, a route=hiking jest dla pieszych
voltairovicz (2024-03-08 09:17:32+00:00): Gościniec Królewski jest ogólną nazwą drogi dla tego szlaku i na niektórych odcinkach przebiegają zarówno szlaki rowerowe i piesze. Aczkolwiek jeśli chodzi o tę relacje miałem na myśli szlak rowerowy, bo piesze już są dodane. Nawet przed chwilą zerknąłem jeszcze na mapę na stronie nadleśnictwa https://kozienice.radom.lasy.gov.pl/documents/11022/0/Mapa+turystyczna+Nadle%C5%9Bnictwa+Kozienice/255fc7ee-f2a3-b8c3-4200-6f004d81a05a?t=1507875226810
Zakropkowaną kreska jest szlak rowerowy
michalgwo (2024-03-08 11:10:00+00:00): Szlak w OSM nie pokrywa się z żadnym  szlakiem na mapie, jeśli dobrze rozumiem to jest trasa którą przebywał Władysław Jagiełło, może zamiast route=hiking, lepiej by tu pasowało route=historic + historic=road?
voltairovicz (2024-03-08 11:52:10+00:00): Tak, chodzi o ten szlak. Hmm, brzmi to całkiem rozsądnie, możesz zrobić jak uważąsz
michalgwo (2024-03-08 12:31:35+00:00): ok, poprawione
hvalentim (2023-04-15 10:33:12+00:00): Quer-me explicar porque é que elimina sistematicamente as relações? Seriam as zonas que "não estavam marcadas corretamente", ou é o José Tarouca que não entende o que está a ver?
hvalentim (2023-04-15 11:23:34+00:00): Para além do mais, na sua atualização feita com os pés do que aos outros demorou inúmeras horas de trabalho, eliminou pormenores. Por ex. a zona ajardinada em torno do parque de estacionamento; o perímetro da Fonte São José etc...
JCT03 (2023-04-15 13:59:12+00:00): Todas as minhas alterações são feitas porque conheço a localização, não por não entender o que estou a ver mas sim porque conheço a zona, podem ser "horas de trabalho", mas se algo está errado tem de ser corrigido.
hvalentim (2023-04-21 19:13:12+00:00): 1)	O meu ‘apport’ ao mapeamento do local foi feito depois de o ter longamente visitado.
2)	Exatamente o que é que entende que estava “errado”?
3)	A única coisa manifesta e deliberadamente “errada” era o uso do tag natural=rock nas muralhas. Opção que seria fácil de corrigir removendo-o.
4)	Sem dúvida é sempre possível melhorar o trabalho dos outros, até porque o tempo passa e os locais mudam.
5)	Não obstante, tal transformação deve ser aditiva. I.e., deve tanto quanto possível respeitar e aproveitar o trabalho alheio, melhorando-o. O que é o contrário de o apagar de cruz. E muito mais de remover detalhes.
6)	A utilização do ID é dificilmente compatível com geometrias complexas que vão além do óbvio: reaproveitar e relacionar semanticamente os elementos do mapa entre si (se este muro faz parte do limite de uma horta e é simultaneamente a traseira de uma casa de habitação, os dados devem reaproveitá-la para o descrever ao invés de se produzirem sucessivas geometrias com elementos redundantes e desgarrados).
7)	De facto, o ID é uma ferramenta que tendencialmente impõe um simplismo daninho, impede os utilizadores de pensar além da lógica da infinita sobreposição de linhas e limita a sua própria compreensão/capacidade de aprendizagem quanto ao processo de edição e à forma como a informação se articula. É a meu ver completamente inadequado para tratar e catalogar volumes apreciáveis de dados, em espaços complexos.
Nakaner (2024-08-28 09:33:05+00:00): Hallo,

der von dir hier verwendete Änderungssatzkommentar ist schlicht und einfach irreführend. Du behauptest, dass du die Reihenfolge der Ways in der Route sortierst. Stattdessen hast du den Streckenverlauf zwischen Fulda und Kassel von der Neubaustrecke auf die Altbaustrecke verlegt. (Anmerkung für Leser, die das in Zukunft lesen: Von April bis Dezember 2023 war die Schnellfahrstrcke wegen Bauarbeiten gesperrt)

Ich bitte dich hiermit, künftig immer bei deinen Änderungen einen aussagekräftigen Änderungssatzkommentar zu verwenden, der deine Änderung beschreibt.

Viele Grüße

Michael
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-09 20:23:58+00:00): What is the source for https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10782136636 ? Surely not aerial imagery?

See also https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4146249
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-06 11:00:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134571999 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed mechanica edits, including those referred to at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7024 and some others.  See also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/currently-ongoing-automated-edit-for-service-vehicle/97737 .
user_5359 (2023-04-04 06:10:02+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful when editing the map data. You moved a node over 100 meters, so there were problems with the corresponding way. I completely reversed your change set.

It is not enough to name a building, you also have to describe what happens in the building. Please read https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:sport
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-06 11:01:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134571999 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed mechanica edits, including those referred to at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7024 and some others.  See also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/currently-ongoing-automated-edit-for-service-vehicle/97737 .
olo81 (2023-04-18 18:20:57+00:00): Zestaw zmian wycofany,  proszę nie rozdzielać dróg jeśli ich jezdnia nie jest fizycznie rozdzielona.
FROGER Alain (2023-04-03 16:26:35+00:00): 999 route des pauses 26400 SUZE
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-06 10:59:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134571999 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed mechanica edits, including those referred to at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7024 and some others.  See also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/currently-ongoing-automated-edit-for-service-vehicle/97737 .
Ydel (2023-04-04 18:43:25+00:00): Hi CheetahMapping,
Thanks for the contribution and welcome on OSM.
I quickly checked your contribution and it look OK.
For the relations like https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15677824 there is no need to duplicate the attributes on the outer way.
To make it easier for other contributors to review your changes try to make smaller changesets and comment what you did.
Have a nice evening.
Yann
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-06 10:59:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134571999 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed mechanica edits, including those referred to at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7024 and some others.  See also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/currently-ongoing-automated-edit-for-service-vehicle/97737 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-06 10:59:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134571999 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed mechanica edits, including those referred to at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7024 and some others.  See also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/currently-ongoing-automated-edit-for-service-vehicle/97737 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-06 11:02:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134571999 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed mechanica edits, including those referred to at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7024 and some others.  See also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/currently-ongoing-automated-edit-for-service-vehicle/97737 .
mike140 (2023-04-06 07:07:32+00:00): Для маршруту не потрібно додавати на мапу окремі лінії - належить використовувати вже наявні шляхи
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-04-04 06:50:20+00:00): Czemu dodałeś https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=mini%20roundabout na Radzymińskiej?

Skąd twoje wiedza o istnieniu tych rond tam?
silversurfer83 (2023-04-04 07:40:00+00:00): Moin
du hast bei den Quellen "Google StreetView" angegeben... Ist das ein Tippfehler weil du was ähnliches (mapillary) genutzt hast oder hast du wirklich Google SV genutzt?

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134462409
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-06 10:58:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134571999 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed mechanica edits, including those referred to at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7024 and some others.  See also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/currently-ongoing-automated-edit-for-service-vehicle/97737 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-06 11:00:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134571999 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed mechanica edits, including those referred to at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7024 and some others.  See also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/currently-ongoing-automated-edit-for-service-vehicle/97737 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-06 10:59:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134571999 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed mechanica edits, including those referred to at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7024 and some others.  See also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/currently-ongoing-automated-edit-for-service-vehicle/97737 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-06 11:01:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134571999 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed mechanica edits, including those referred to at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7024 and some others.  See also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/currently-ongoing-automated-edit-for-service-vehicle/97737 .
Kovoschiz (2023-04-04 12:52:40+00:00): Pleae explain what you are doing.
Kovoschiz (2023-04-04 12:57:30+00:00): Other features should not be attached to roads. This makes editing difficult, and doesn't represent reality.
vasinlo26 (2023-04-04 14:40:07+00:00): please alway use "hide" to avoid the attached things
Kovoschiz (2023-04-04 15:49:42+00:00): You yourself have attached a `=peak` to `=path`. So I don't know what you are complaining.
vasinlo26 (2023-04-04 16:28:04+00:00): what an earth are you people?
im sorry my english is not well, let see the JPG at first place, https://ibb.co/C0bnc0M
you were attached all the nodes into your ridge line, then, they were misplaced and some are out of foot path, what are you doing?
Kovoschiz (2023-04-06 13:42:46+00:00): What are you reading? 
1. Yes, they are supposed to be on `=ridge`. 
2. Yes, they must not be attached to `highway=`
adrianojbr (2023-04-11 22:25:05+00:00): Olá, Alison!

Percebi que você tem mapeado bastante em Jaraguá do Sul. Suas contribuições são muito boas. Parabéns!

Eu não sei se você já sabe, mas a prefeitura disponibiliza imagens de alta resolução para mapeamento, que podem ser ativadas no menu lateral direito. Elas são de 2020, então estão um pouco desatualizadas, mas também estão disponíveis as imagens da Maxar e da Esri que são mais atuais, aí é possível comparar o que existe, e se houver na camada da prefeitura, dá para mapear com bastante qualidade.

Abraço!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134463102
literan (2023-04-03 16:55:59+00:00): поломали улицу Обручева этой правкой https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/267859733

будьте внимательнее, пожалуйста
Dave Venables (2023-04-08 11:34:20+00:00): In Hulland Ward
Kovoschiz (2023-04-04 12:53:22+00:00): Please always improve objects. This is a continously refined process about increasing quality over time. Never delete them without replacement.
vasinlo26 (2023-04-04 14:14:28+00:00): saddly, not everyone wanted to waste time to wipe your "contribution"
vasinlo26 (2023-04-04 14:20:07+00:00): i will suggest you alway to contribe the very correct information which is not a parallel & nearby things. and please not to merge nodes to make it hard to remove, its annoying as i say
Kovoschiz (2023-04-04 15:49:02+00:00): 1. `=ridge` and `=path` are different things. 
2. `=peak` are supposed to be on `=ridge`.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-04-03 17:00:31+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/755008608

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Dave Venables (2023-04-08 11:34:40+00:00): Was What's your poison