piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Beau Jonckers (2026-05-25 20:13:49+00:00): Vielen Dank für die Informationen und die Quellen. Mir war nicht bewusst, dass so viel Privatbesitz ist.

Wenn Radfahren im Wald als „Erholungszweck“ angesehen wird, erscheint es mir praktisch kaum umsetzbar, bei jedem Weg, der im Wald gekreuzt wird, zu überprüfen, ob es sich um einen Weg handelt, der in oder durch den Wald verläuft, und ob der betreffende Wald privat ist oder nicht.

Was ist zum Beispiel, wenn ein Feldweg entlang einer Wiese beginnt und erst nach 50, 500 oder 5000 Metern in den Wald hineinführt?

Wenn ein Weg wirklich privat ist, stehen dort oft entsprechende Schilder. Dass Wälder häufig Privatbesitz sind, ist jetzt zwar klar, aber für Nutzer bleibt trotzdem wenig nachvollziehbar, was offiziell erlaubt oder nicht erlaubt ist. Auch wenn es in der Praxis vermutlich meist keinen großen Unterschied macht.
Rainero (2026-03-15 10:35:52+00:00): Revert mit changeset/179891126
(unzulässige Quelle)
InsertUser (2026-02-18 22:09:46+00:00): Have they finally moved in then?

Do you happen to know whether they've completely abandoned the building over the bridge now or is it still being used for some things?
loqomango (2026-02-20 18:44:15+00:00): They have moved into the Southern Buildings in the former Kipling Complex, the northern buildings are currently under construction. The UB campus only consists of the former Kipling Complex, with the old International Building (a 4-5 storey building) rightfully being identified as demolished. The complex east of Freeport, GB, "over the bridge" is currently unoccupied, though I have heard that it might become an additional environmental program oriented campus.
gpserror (2026-02-17 20:42:23+00:00): I'd probably not have the name of the establishment on the building since it's also on the landuse, it's assumed that all buildings inside of a landuse is related so it's redundant (and carto renders it funny with the name listed twice)... just a comment about naming...
TheNightRider (2026-02-17 22:15:55+00:00): Thanks, I thought about that, and then I got a phone call and forgot. Yes, I agree that if the name is on the landuse then it should not also be on the building. Updated! So then the question becomes, "Do you keep the address on the building or move it to the landuse area?"
TheNightRider (2026-02-17 22:18:23+00:00): In this case there's only one building, so it's a moot point, but if there were several buildings (like nextdoor to the west: Steeplechase III), then each building will usually have its own address). For RiverPointe I left the address on the building. Is that good?
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-16 06:43:40+00:00): Cleaned up remaining SEO spam and incorrect tagging in changeset 183801697

https://osm.org/changeset/183801697
Carto'Cité (2026-03-10 08:15:33+00:00): Bonjour Paul.
En fait tu as supprimé public_transport=station du périmètre https://www.osm.org/way/683359512, et non railway=station (qui lui est bien sur le node). Je l'ai restauré.
Antoine.
trial (2026-02-18 18:00:01+00:00): En particulier du côté de https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28703578, ce sera à reprendre
Map-Peter (2026-02-26 00:30:52+00:00): Hallo freesey,
 
beachte immer das Copyright!
 
Hier hast du das Bild (Deep-Link) einfach von dieser Webseite ( https://www.hotelhorizont.de , erstes Hintergrundbild ganz oben) genommen.
 
Zitat aus deren Impressum:  
"Alle auf dieser Internetpräsenz verwendeten Inhalte wie zum Beispiel Texte, FOTOS, Videos und grafischen Gestaltungen sind urheberrechtlich geschützt."
 
Die Beachtung des Copyright nehmen wir bei OSM sehr ernst - siehe: osm.wiki/DE:Copyright - Lese das bitte und halte dich zukünftig immer daran.
 
Ich werde diesen Vorfall nicht der DWG ( osm.wiki/DE:Data_working_group ) melden, weil ich denke das es keine böse Absicht deinerseits war.
acubens71 (2026-02-17 16:18:57+00:00): il manque un accent à "Château". Cordialement
azdenardi (2026-02-17 15:46:59+00:00): https://via.it/portfolio/variante-stradale-di-longarone/
Il precedente disegno dell'immissione stradale rispecchiava i disegni pubblicati.
Pucciotrex30 (2026-02-17 15:51:52+00:00): Oooops ... MEA CULPA
credevo che ci fosse stato un errore .

Ok se il disegno è ufficiale va bene , solo che sembra strano che la rampa di uno svincolo si immetta a 90° su una superstrada
Busaiolis (2026-02-17 17:37:21+00:00): Ahimè c'è una ragione, per quanto ciò possa sembrare ridicolo: https://www.mit.gov.it/nfsmitgov/files/media/normativa/2016-02/Decreto_Ministeriale_19-04-2006_all_1.pdf
Pucciotrex30 (2026-02-18 07:30:10+00:00): ok , allora due cose :

1) Mi faresti un riassunto di quel decreto , visto che allo schermo leggo male e poi il legalese è difficile?

2) posso usare solo ID e non Josm e rieditare la way ma non revertarla
Busaiolis (2026-02-18 09:44:17+00:00): In sostanza, nella parte di decreto in cui si parla di corsie di accelerazione/decelerazione (ad es., tabella 1, pag. 18) sono vietate le corsie di immissione su strade di tipo C, cioè extraurbane secondarie. In altre parole, per avere corsie di immissione su una strada extraurbana è necessario che sia almeno di tipo B, cioè abbia almeno due corsie per senso di marcia E carreggiate separate. Ciò è a mio parere assurdo, in quanto crea storture come quella di cui ci stiamo occupando adesso, però il decreto è così e i progettisti devono rispettarlo.

Per quanto riguarda il revert me ne occupo tranquillamente io, non c'è problema.
aTarom (2026-02-17 15:32:39+00:00): Hola, se han añadido dos tags totalmente nuevos:
> admin_level:type
> admin_level:type_alt
es importante que nos pongamos de acuerdo para estandarizar lo que quieres indicar, te puedes pasar por el grupo de telegram para intentar comentarlo?
los retiro a la espera de más información
puedes discutirlo en
https://t.me/OSMes
ó
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/es/51
Saludos
yelisey90 (2026-02-18 10:12:17+00:00): reverted - these shops are already mapped as nodes (and generally, it's more practical to map shops as nodes, separately from the building)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178717729
b-jazz (2026-03-13 17:38:57+00:00): There's a gray area on when mapping a golf rough is really worthwhile. I couldn't find any difference between the grass inside your rough areas and outside your rough areas. Probably best just to leave them out at that point.
silversurfer83 (2026-02-17 19:13:30+00:00): Moin,

hab mal eben geguckt. Wenn ich bei OsmAnd "POI erstellen" -> "Art des POI" das Wort "lades" eintippe, erhalte ich direkt die korrekten Eigenschaften für eine Ladestation (amenity=charging_station). Dies kannst du auch sehen, wenn du unterhalb auf "Fortgeschritten" klickst, da dir OsmAnd dann direkt einen kompletten tag-editor liefert mit dem du alles sauber eingeben kannst, wenn du magst. 

happy mapping

(wenn dies nur eine Art Platzhalter sein soll bis du am Rechner sitzt, dann kannst du die Nachricht so halb ignorieren. Aber auch Vorläufige Edits können mit OsmAnd schon ziemlich sauber gemacht werden)
matze089 (2026-02-18 11:10:59+00:00): Danke. Muss mich nur daran erinnern, wenn ich das vor Ort eingebe.
honapak (2026-02-24 20:01:02+00:00): Bridges without names have been given incorrect names in this changeset.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-03-14 00:05:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 179832897 where the changeset comment is: Reverting numerous undiscussed road category changes.  See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=2261940 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19961
tguen (2026-02-19 21:19:16+00:00): Please remove the email and denomination tags, they belong to the previous occupant.
tguen (2026-03-06 05:26:50+00:00): It's been 2 weeks and you still haven't fixed it, so I'll do it. Please be more careful in the future.
TinPetreković (2026-02-18 11:41:45+00:00): The roads that were split unnecessarily have been merged back together in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178721731
Hufkratzer (2026-02-18 22:27:11+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1479804868 does not look like a horse riding centre ( leisure=horse_riding ); it looks like a horse riding arena, similar to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1019077795 ( leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian ); see also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a#Riding_centre_(equestrian) . The arena probably belongs to https://haraslarebatiere.ffe.com/ which could be mapped as a separate object (node or area) with tag leisure=horse_riding .
casoum (2026-02-19 09:58:57+00:00): Hi Hufkratzer,

Thank you for the tips, I have added the detail in changeset/178763779
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-03-14 00:05:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 179832897 where the changeset comment is: Reverting numerous undiscussed road category changes.  See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=2261940 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19961
taunode (2026-02-17 15:57:36+00:00): Klasse!
Fizzie-DWG (2026-06-18 01:06:51+00:00): DWG revert - poor quality mapping

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184250206
tauba (2026-02-20 09:47:32+00:00): Servus,
ich glaub du hast mit deiner Änderung die B124 (ungewollt) umverlegt!
Kannst du das bitte wieder korrigieren?
Danke!
tguen (2026-02-19 21:21:44+00:00): Please square the buildings you edited here. I've already asked you twice.
tguen (2026-03-06 05:45:54+00:00): It's been 2 weeks, so I've fixed these as well.
tguen (2026-03-06 05:48:38+00:00): Also please stop mapping trampolines in back yards. They are not permanent features.
trial (2026-02-17 17:09:24+00:00): Bonjour, à lire https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10940619366, champ note : "Please do not add the tag public_transport=station, it is already on the way that defines the footprint of the station", ceci est une boulette. Et l'objet en question a le tag interdit :-(.
Je te laisse le soin de regarder l'historique des différents objets pour comprendre le pourquoi du comment et voir avec ceux qui en sont à l'origine afin de vous mettre d'accord. Je veux bien au plus compter les points !
paul_sncf_connect (2026-02-18 07:53:16+00:00): Hello,

Merci pour ton retour. Effectivement, j'ai oublié de supprimer la note.

Mon objectif était de supprimer les tags public_transport=station et railway=station du polygone (footprint) afin d'éviter les doublons de données et de rendu (comme sur OSM ou carte.app). C'est un problème récurrent qui ne concerne pas que la gare de Lorient, mais des dizaines de gares en France.

Je vais en discuter sur le forum dans la semaine afin qu'on trouve un consensus sur ces histoires de nœuds et polygones qui possèdent les mêmes tags et créent des doublons.
trial (2026-02-18 08:46:10+00:00): Entièrement d'accord sur le constat et le forum est un bon endroit pour en parler.
CAM-Gerlach (2026-02-17 16:49:32+00:00): Looks good, thanks! For the record I do agree with the change (to add directional) in principle, and am planning to do comprehensively once discussed with the community. Thanks!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178686469
NeisBot (2026-02-17 16:15:50+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13573801751 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Medical facility"
---
Na przykład, bardziej neutralna i obiektywna wersja Twojego tekstu mogłaby brzmieć: "Obiekt medyczny"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-02-25 17:33:08+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/178687822
Karthoo (2026-02-18 06:06:21+00:00): Änderungssatz in changeset/178709160 rückgängig gemacht. Bei weiterem Vandalismus werde ich mich an die DWG wenden und einen Block veranlassen. Ich bin genauso enttäuscht über die freigegebene Tötung des Wolfes, aber OSM kann da nichts für.
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-18 06:23:15+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie powinna zawierać przedrostka.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13573845483

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-18 06:23:11+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13573782116

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
AndyB_66 (2026-02-17 16:41:16+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
felipeeugenio (2026-02-18 21:24:07+00:00): Hola, el access=customeer es para negocios y cosas por el estilo. Para condominios privados está bien private.

Por lo demas, no parece ser que estas quebradas estén canalizadas subterráneamente.

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178688280
Alejandro Vera (2026-02-18 22:28:09+00:00): Sobre el access=customer, ok, creí que era al revés, hay alguna forma de indicar que si bien son calles de un condominio pueden transitar empresas que hacen delivery?
Sobre la canalización de aguas, en todos los cruces con caminos hay conductos para que el agua de lluvia pase por debajo de ellos, en invierno el agua no cruza los caminos por la superficie.
jptolosa (2026-02-18 23:01:05+00:00): access=private + motor_vehicle=delivery podría ser una solución, pero de todas formas hay que poner el access=private
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-03-14 00:05:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 179832897 where the changeset comment is: Reverting numerous undiscussed road category changes.  See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=2261940 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19961
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-18 06:23:14+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.

"Powidz":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13573881760
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13573881761
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13573881762
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1479820217

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-03-14 00:05:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 179832897 where the changeset comment is: Reverting numerous undiscussed road category changes.  See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=2261940 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19961
AndyB_66 (2026-02-17 18:25:15+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-03-14 00:05:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 179832897 where the changeset comment is: Reverting numerous undiscussed road category changes.  See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=2261940 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19961
eggie (2026-02-17 16:55:39+00:00): Dag Siep,

Je zou nog even access=private kunnen toevoegen. Het zal geen openbaar zwembad zijn. 

MVG
eggie
VictorIE (2026-02-18 15:27:23+00:00): Hi,

Welcome to OSM. Well done on your first day's mapping count ~1675 objects added / edited.

I deleted the one-too-many house on this terrace on Father Mathew Road: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1479824549/

Tip: We find that it is often easier to determine the number of houses by looking at the back gardens / yards.
NeisBot (2026-02-17 17:00:39+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 7 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1479825072 v1 | 7 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178688971
NeisReview (2026-02-25 17:33:10+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/178753515
NeisBot (2026-02-17 17:06:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 7 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1479825072 v2 | 7 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178689262
NeisBot (2026-02-17 17:09:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 8 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/795167189 v2 | 5 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1364676724 v2 | 3 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178689297
NeisReview (2026-02-25 17:33:10+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/178708622
Rainero (2026-03-15 10:28:48+00:00): Revert mit changeset/179890897
(unzulässige Quelle)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-03-14 00:05:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 179832897 where the changeset comment is: Reverting numerous undiscussed road category changes.  See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=2261940 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19961
VictorIE (2026-02-18 16:22:17+00:00): Hi,

Welcome to OSM. Congratulations on ~770 contributions on your first day. :)

If there are terraces of houses, like the one this was a member of: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1479834029/ there is a tool in the JOSM editor for doing this automatically.

Tip: Add details like number of storeys, street address, etc. before the split, that way each individual house can have those details.
porfiriopaiz (2026-02-18 04:20:50+00:00): Hola BigKev97.

Muchas gracias por tus contribuciones y tus mejoras al mapa.

¿Podrías indicar cuál es la fuente desde la cuál estás tomando los nombres para estas calles?

Saludos.
eggie (2026-02-17 18:21:15+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  Je hebt alleen met je actie het gebouw verwijderd uit de rendering door building=yes te verwijderen.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-02-17 18:24:48+00:00): Gebouw hersteld
NeisBot (2026-02-17 17:45:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 9 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1479825072 v3 | 7 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178690696
NeisReview (2026-02-26 05:33:09+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/178753515
NeisBot (2026-02-17 17:48:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13296887253 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Ice Cream Shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
Comino (2026-02-18 08:12:53+00:00): Hi,

In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes".

Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag !
Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead.

For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Merchants#tagging-guidance
and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bitcoin

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
BTC Maps
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Comino
eggie (2026-02-17 18:26:48+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
tux67 (2026-02-18 07:33:52+00:00): Hi, hast du den neuen Kollegen auf den Wert seiner "Korrekturen" hingewiesen oder offen wir auf eine einmalige Aktion ;-) ?

Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178692107
hsc666 (2026-02-18 19:27:22+00:00): Letzteres. ;-)

Es war ja nicht alles falsch und ich hatte tatsächlich nicht die Muße die etlichen Fehler zu erklären. Falls es sich häufen sollte, wird das wohl notwendig werden...
AndyB_66 (2026-02-17 18:21:08+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
ToniE (2026-02-17 18:34:13+00:00): Ähm, das war Bus 451.
AndyB_66 (2026-02-17 18:22:33+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
toco (2026-02-17 18:58:39+00:00): danke. da bin ich offenbar in eine falle getappt.
bxl-forever (2026-02-18 11:07:55+00:00): Why does this polygon has a name and nothing else?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1479855187

Isn’t there a confusion between polygons and multipolygons?  We can help you fix the map if you want.
Baloo Uriza (2026-02-17 22:14:35+00:00): Could you take another look at this camera, please?  The road and stop sign got moved out of alignment, and I moved it back, but I'm not aware of the camera you were mapping and can't hope to re-add that one accurately as a result of moving the stop sign and road back.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178693432
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-18 06:23:07+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13572741711
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1021242892

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eggie (2026-02-17 22:19:38+00:00): Dag kijet   Je phonenumber  overgezet naar de juiste node.
MVG
eggie
kijetesantakalu (2026-02-20 15:12:04+00:00): dankjewel! wat deed ik precies verkeerd?