piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
AlexSpritze (2026-06-11 09:51:51+00:00): Das Gebäude: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/611278552/history
felipeeugenio (2025-03-28 12:30:21+00:00): Buena edición. 

Si una calle no tiene nombre, entonces agregar noname=yes

Pasa mucho con los condominios, que se tiende a agregar el nombre del condominio como nombre de las calles interiores.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164176048
Gregory Peony (2025-04-04 03:46:38+00:00): These are temporal yurts as outlined in the project building reference guide, and should not be mapped. It not a big deal I deleted them but you don't need to spend the time or effort to map them.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164176067
fayor (2025-03-27 22:42:21+00:00): Ciao, il castello era già mappato.
Gregory Peony (2025-04-18 19:43:04+00:00): Generally the footpritns you added here represent buildings in the imagery, some could be more accurate. It looks like you improved the geometry of existing footprints instead of deleting them and redrawing, well done.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164176423
pyrog (2025-08-08 16:15:41+00:00): Bonjour,
Quelle est ta source pour ce sentier ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1372171466#map=16/42.70053/0.61158&layers=P

Il fait l'objet de 2 secours en montagne (cf. post Facebook cité ici : 
https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/rendu-de-carte-et-mise-en-danger/36419
opline (2025-08-08 16:19:29+00:00): Nous avons ouvert une discussion à ce sujet juste ici : https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/rendu-de-carte-et-mise-en-danger/36419
7tonin (2025-08-18 21:16:31+00:00): Merci pour l'alerte par ce canal, j'aurais dû la considérer plus tôt.
C'est un passage que j'ai "inventé", au sens de découvert, en l'empruntant personnellement. Je vais compléter et développer cette expérience ici, ou ailleurs.
7tonin (2025-08-19 05:23:13+00:00): Voici le complément et le développement de cette expérience. Comme c'est la 189ème contribution du fil, voici le lien direct : https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/rendu-de-carte-et-mise-en-danger/36419/189
Gregory Peony (2025-04-14 19:09:48+00:00): All footprints valid, accurate and appropriately squared. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164176617
eggie (2025-03-27 18:49:57+00:00): accesstags toegevoegd voor tweewielers en voetganger.
MVG
eggie
Nakaner (2026-04-22 12:18:42+00:00): Hi,

in this changeset, you used data from data.sbb.com. However, their licensing terms say:

"Im Falle von für Publikationen aufbereitete Daten verpflichtet sich der Datenbezüger zu einer dem Verwendungszweck angemessenen regelmässigen Aktualisierung der zugrundeliegenden Rohdaten." (section 4.2)

From my point of view, this is incompatible with the Contributor Terms of OSMF. You agreed to those terms. In addition, it contradicts the freedoms granted by ODbL to our data consumers.

Did SBB grant an exception from that clause? Where is it documented? I could not find any documentation on the wiki about that exception. Or is there any official statement by OSMF LWG that SBB license is ODbL compatible?

Please respond to this message either by commenting this changeset or by starting a thread on the Swiss OSM Forum.

Best regards

Michael
Singapuu (2026-04-22 16:04:59+00:00): Hi Michael, 
In Section 11 of the SBB Terms and Conditions, Openstreetmap.org is explicitly listed as an 'Authorised Database.' and both sbb.ch and opentransportdata.swiss have been listed on the osm wiki ans compliant datasources
It also
Singapuu (2026-04-22 18:40:51+00:00): Forgot to post the rest:
It's also been raised (and resolved) in the OSM Forum back in 2024

Best regards
Tim
Gregory Peony (2025-04-02 02:24:15+00:00): All buildings valid, vast majority accurate. Appropriate modification of residential areas. Residential areas and highways should not share nodes.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164176843
Dodko (2025-03-29 13:05:57+00:00): Adresa je v budove https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/795672547 nepridáva sa duplicitne a neúplne do POI bodu.
NeisReview (2025-03-28 05:41:21+00:00): #NameCheck

Hello and welcome to OSM.

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits, particularly those concerning the names you've added or modified.

Some of these names caught my attention as they are quite unique or a bit unusual. Could you please confirm if these additions were intentional or if they might have been added mistakenly?

Looking forward to your response.

Thank you!
Gregory Peony (2025-07-27 03:35:48+00:00): You used Bing to map the buildings in the West here meaning that they were not properly aligned with others. I advocate for using mltiple sources where it helps, but I recommend aligning the sources you use before mapping for the best results. I moved the footprints into alignment.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164176953
NeisReview (2025-03-28 05:39:44+00:00): #NameCheck

Hello and welcome to OSM.

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits, particularly those concerning the names you've added or modified.

Some of these names caught my attention as they are quite unique or a bit unusual. Could you please confirm if these additions were intentional or if they might have been added mistakenly?

Looking forward to your response.

Thank you!
Gregory Peony (2025-04-14 19:19:15+00:00): Overall a good contribution, but highways and buildings should not share nodes and the round building actually has square corners. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164177218
Gregory Peony (2025-04-02 01:53:22+00:00): All footprints added here are valid, the vast majority are accurate. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164177235
NeisReview (2025-03-28 05:38:20+00:00): #NameCheck

Hello and welcome to OSM.

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits, particularly those concerning the names you've added or modified.

Some of these names caught my attention as they are quite unique or a bit unusual. Could you please confirm if these additions were intentional or if they might have been added mistakenly?

Looking forward to your response.

Thank you!
Gregory Peony (2025-07-27 03:21:28+00:00): The footpritns I flagged here are oversized becasue the shadow cast by the building has been included in the shape of the footprint. I think the Southern footprint you added here is most accurate. When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom in so that you can see the outline of the building and mark the corners carefully. Exclude shadows and yards when tracing the footprint.  Keep in mind that you are looking at the roofs of buildings, but mapping their footprints. Depending on how the scene is lit, pitched roofs may have light and dark sections that belong to one building. Generally pitched roofs overhang the walls of a building, so a footprint slightly smaller than the roof is accurate. You can scale selected features in ID with shift+(-/+), or JOSM with ctrl.+alt+Lclick & drag. Take care to make contributions that others can build upon.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164177316
Gregory Peony (2025-04-06 02:40:52+00:00): Looks like you identified buildings in the imagery here but the footprints are not very accurate if you place too many nodes like with the building to the south you can delete them with delete or backspace, if you don't make enough you can add them by by dragging from between two other points.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164177322
Gregory Peony (2025-04-09 20:02:22+00:00): All footprints here are valid, but could be more accurate. Consider how data representing physical features interacts: You added a footprint which overlaps a highway here. ni this case the highway should have been moved to make space for the footprint.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164177410
Gregory Peony (2025-07-27 03:16:18+00:00): All but the footprint I flagged here represent buildings and are appropriately squared but could be more accurate.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164177471
yelisey90 (2025-03-27 22:26:02+00:00): reverted: vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164185609
LA2017_UTRK (2025-03-29 17:25:54+00:00): I reverted the changeset because I wanted it, I think it could no longer be gotua

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164258920
Gregory Peony (2025-04-14 19:20:33+00:00): Every footprint here is valid and accurate (including the round one). Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164177641
Gregory Peony (2025-07-12 01:22:36+00:00): You made a good decision to not square all of the corners of the SE footprint.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164177642
Gregory Peony (2025-04-04 04:07:20+00:00): The vast majority of footprints here are valid and accurate. Thank you for your attention to detail and contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164177802
Glassman (2025-03-28 22:49:18+00:00): Quick question. Does the Quick Silver Coffee shop still exist here?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164177954
Gregory Peony (2025-03-27 18:57:04+00:00): All of the footprints you added here are valid; those which you squared and rounded are accurate. Please modify features witch are likely to overlapp with your mapping like the residential area before you beging adding data. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164177985
Gregory Peony (2025-03-27 19:06:23+00:00): I resolved the issues. Check the task changesets to see my edits.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164177985
Gregory Peony (2025-07-12 01:19:52+00:00): You correctly identified buildings in imagery. Some of these footprints are oversized. You correctly identified the shape of the L shaped building.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164177990
yelisey90 (2025-03-27 22:26:03+00:00): reverted: vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164185609
Gregory Peony (2025-04-02 21:48:29+00:00): Looks like you accidentally modified a admin boundary here; you can filter them out in ID using (map features) in the map data panel to prevent editing them. If you find buildings which are not square check if their geometries are good if so it may be possible to simply square them, however in this case the geometry should have been improved as overlap errors may not be addressed by squaring alone.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164178014
Baloo Uriza (2025-03-31 14:12:12+00:00): Shape matters a lot, please be patient and take time to draw accurately.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164178057
Gregory Peony (2025-07-13 01:01:23+00:00): Generally the buildings you mapped are valid and appropriately squared, but oversized. Take care to not include the shadow in the footprint and keep in mind that roofs tend to overhang building walls.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164178107
sembelst134 (2026-02-24 08:17:56+00:00): Hallo, gibt es mittlerweile womöglich neue Informationen über die Brücke? offiziell ist es nicht mehr als Baustelle gelistet und eine K-Straße wird wohl kaum wegen einer Brücke 1 Jahr gesperrt sein https://baustellen.sachsen.de/
Gregory Peony (2025-04-02 22:55:50+00:00): Good overlall a few buildings here could be a bit more accurate in orientation. You get the best orientation informatino when one pixel of the imagery maps to one on your screen which usually occurs when you're zoomed out. At the extremes features bias to the cardinal directions.--- The highway going E/W here goes more south on the Western side. You can see some highway modifications I made in the area in Changeset: 164441615 Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164178218
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-27 16:32:25+00:00): wycofuję edycje z podejrzanego konta, patrz brak odpowiedzi w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 i https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Map_Rivers/blocks

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166835065
Fizzie-DWG (2025-03-29 01:44:11+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17467
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-12 02:09:41+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164838630
Gregory Peony (2025-04-03 05:42:02+00:00): Footprints here are generally valid though are a little oversized.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164178470
Gregory Peony (2025-04-02 22:59:46+00:00): Good correction of the highway geometry in the NW to avoid overlaps. Some highways here still overlap buildings visible in imagery. The stratgic use of splitting (x) and moving (m) can help move highways into alignment more quickly.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164178536
Gregory Peony (2025-04-14 01:52:53+00:00): All footprints here are valid. The two in the north are quite accurate the two in the south could be more accurate. Check Changeset: 164917634 to see how I mapped these footprints and others nearby.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164178570
Gregory Peony (2025-04-19 00:33:33+00:00): Overall a high quality contribution. Thank you for your contribution. Generally the footpritns here are valid and acurate. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164178595
Circular Elevation (2025-03-28 13:33:15+00:00): I've come to understand that this might be considered "mapping for the renderer." Although it's true that you can't legally make a right angle turn at that point where the roads cross, so I'm not sure
Gregory Peony (2025-07-11 20:48:00+00:00): Well done you imprvoed the accuracy of these footprints by appropriately squaring them. They could still be more accurate. Generally the footprint can be a bit smaller than the roof.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164178720
Kiss_Karoly (2025-10-02 09:15:34+00:00): Szia!
Ehhez a ponthoz:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9195221924
Az általad adott kozterkep.hu link nem helyes. A linked Sztraka Ernő domborművéhez visz. Ezen a ponton viszont Harmati Imre alhadnagy domborműve van.
gabro00 (2025-10-02 09:20:30+00:00): Szia! Köszi a jelzést, visszaállítottam https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172739960
envagyokabela (2025-11-10 15:58:31+00:00): egy másik is félrement: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174470630
gabro00 (2025-11-10 16:01:58+00:00): Köszi a javítást!
bxl-forever (2025-03-28 09:38:46+00:00): Hello.

In Every Door, you can change the tags of shops and replace them with the new kind of business replacing them.

This is better than erasing Bibliopolis and creating a brand new node for My Tannour in the same building.  We prefer keeping the existing nodes, because we have spent time linking them to entrance doors, and because it is easier to monitor the history of places that change over the years.

Happy mapping.
csett86 (2025-03-28 11:03:21+00:00): Hi, sorry to disturb the map there, that was not my intention. Thank you for your contructive feedback, and feel free to revert my changeset, then I redo it without deletion
chris2map (2025-04-12 07:16:52+00:00): As far as I know it's "demolished:highway=primary_link",
see also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
jhaluska80 (2025-04-12 19:41:17+00:00): You're right.  I've just been doing too much late night mapping.  I have updated the tag.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-10 07:58:30+00:00): Split Brownstone Law SEO spam POI details from building and cleaned up tags in changeset 183909729

https://osm.org/changeset/183909729
Gregory Peony (2025-04-04 03:50:40+00:00): Thesse footpritns should be squared. Hold Alt to prevent your cursor from snapping to data. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164179146
britischer_elch (2025-03-27 19:20:27+00:00): Natürlich den Link zum Hinweis vergessen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4685023#map=15/48.12527/14.22815
Gregory Peony (2025-04-03 05:40:41+00:00): in the SE you accurately mapped footpritns with a more complex shape, well done. For round buildings or those which share the same shape copyying and pasting footprints can actually make things faster and more condidtent, just be sure to only use that technique for features with the same shape.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164179479
user_5359 (2025-03-28 15:17:13+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/relation/18903432. What is the mean of the tag Alex=Consani ?
Katz K (2025-03-28 18:29:26+00:00): Hello! Thanks for pointing this out. This is an accidental copypaste from somewhere. But I also realized I mistakenly cut pieces from the resort multypolygon - removing everything that's not wood. That is also wrong. I'll fix this when I get to josm at home.
I apologize for inconvenience.
Gregory Peony (2025-04-03 04:52:09+00:00): Thanks for modifying some of these footprints; it looks like you improved their accuracy.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164179706
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 05:27:58+00:00): DWG revert - sock-puppet account

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164402167
Gregory Peony (2025-04-19 03:05:35+00:00): You did well to not square way/1372166507. I noticed that you're using JOSM but didn't accurately map the more complex buildings. If you're interested in how to map some of these buildings please check out this diary entry to see how to draw more complex building footprints. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Koreller/diary/404988
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164179767
Gregory Peony (2025-03-31 15:58:55+00:00): All but one of these footprints are valid; the one I flagged represents a barrier. The footprints you added here should have been squared. Two share a node: hold alt to prevent your cursor from snapping to data. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164179798
wolfbert (2025-03-29 16:57:45+00:00): Hallo, grundsätzlich ok, an der Lagegenauigkeit lässt sich noch arbeiten. In ID kannst Du dafür als Hintergrund wahlweise basemap, basemap Orthofoto oder basemap Terrain versuchen. 

Bei den Tags (die Du aber nicht geändert hast) wäre zu unterscheiden zwischen highway=track (Feld/Forstweg), path (Weg in der Natur) und footway (eher urban). footway + foot=yes ist doppelt gemoppelt. Der Großteil des Weges ist mit access=no bezeichnet, das wäre ein komplettes Betretungsverbot, scheint mir überzogen. Und mehr Details gehen immer, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dpath.
Gregory Peony (2025-03-31 16:23:10+00:00): All footprints added here are valid. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164179925
eggie (2025-03-27 20:01:33+00:00): Dag Flits,

Ik gebruik deze 'tool'
Die vul ik in en het resultaat plak ik in de tagging achter opening_hours

openingsuren-tool

http://projets.pavie.info/yohours/

Dan klopt het altijd.
De format voor phone begint altijd met +31 voor Nederland.

Groet
eggie
Flits216 (2025-03-27 20:52:07+00:00): Erg bedankt, ik zal 'm opslaan!
Gregory Peony (2025-03-27 20:04:46+00:00): Looks like you squared some existing buildings here which is a step in the right direction. Generally these footprints are oversized; their corners should be modified first ro reflect their actual shape and then the corners should be squared.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164179960
Gregory Peony (2025-03-27 20:10:58+00:00): The shared nodes should have been disconected first by selecting them then pressing d
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164179960