piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
grypiomi (2023-05-30 07:44:50+00:00): Dzień dobry.
Zastanawiam się co z tym zrobić. Szlak oficjalnie jest ale to nie jedyny, który wymaga przeprawy z maczetą... Podobny szlak jest w okolicy Ujścia (Janów Lubelski).
Jak oznaczyć, że to bardzo trudny odcinek? Część ścieżki od Świątyni Słońca zostawiłem choć fizycznie jej nie ma. Ten odcinek przeszedłem ale to raptem kilkaset metrów.
englu (2023-05-30 08:17:32+00:00): Dzięki za szybką odpowiedź. Ja zwykle używam atrybutu trail_visibility o wartościach bad lub horrible. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:trail_visibility Przykłady w Wiki pokazują raczej ścieżki odkryte, ale myślę, że do tych zarośniętych też ten atrybut może mieć zastosowanie. Oczywiście należałoby też przywrócić atrybut highway=path.
grypiomi (2023-05-30 09:35:58+00:00): Zatem tak też uczyniłem 😀
englu (2023-05-30 10:03:52+00:00): Dziękuję.
rodolfovargas (2023-05-31 13:02:47+00:00): Muchas gracias por sus aportes.

Para alimentar más el mapeo, podría tomar fotos con MAPILLARY.
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.mapillary.app
Stone_X (2023-05-30 17:41:14+00:00): Dlaczego uważasz, że był on błędny?
Kilka przykładów podobnego mapowania:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/29932372
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/763170872
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2264605211
Czyli koledzy z Niemiec, Wielkiej Brytanii bądź Francji również to źle zmapowali?
zuicz (2023-06-01 10:31:40+00:00): Czy w TG tam coś jeździ czy tylko jest skansen?
Stone_X (2023-06-01 16:19:26+00:00): Jest to minikolejka na terenie skansenu. Jeździ w sezonie letnim i porusza się tylko
na terenie skansenu.
Stacja minikolejki jest również oznaczona tablicą:
https://ibb.co/Lry10H7
 
Więcej można poczytać tu:
https://kopalniasrebra.pl/mapa-atrakcji/
(zob. zakładka "kolejka skansenowa")

Kolejka skansenowa działa dokładnie na takich samych zasadach jak w/w przykłady.
Linki do tych kolejek:
https://www.parkeisenbahn-dresden.de/
https://www.ewr.org.uk/
https://www.parcfloraldelasource.com/les-loisirs/train/
silversurfer83 (2023-05-30 07:39:13+00:00): Hi Brooky11,

a few months ago you have already been asked to please upload your changes before you move to another country. You continue to spam the change set history of quite a lot of people trying to keep an eye on "their" area.
Please read this article and try to keep it a bit tidier in the future. Thank you and safe travels

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

(ps: maps.me isn't really a good choice of app when you wish to contribute to OSM. Maybe consider using something different for that purpose. We're glad to help, should you have questions)
lefuturiste (2023-05-30 16:38:52+00:00): +1  silversurfer83
DaveF (2023-06-09 20:02:58+00:00): Hi
Please don't duplicate prow_ref tag values in the name tag. 'CW3' is not a name.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/499932851/history#map=14/51.3265/1.0096
Glassman (2023-05-31 20:29:24+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.

#TIP: save and upload your edit before moving to a geographic distant location
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136715661
rodolfovargas (2023-05-31 13:37:15+00:00): Gracias Carlita por el aporte.

La categoría correspondería a: leisure=playground, para un patio de juegos infantiles. Además se agregan:
access=yes (no tiene restricción de acceso)
surface=ground (el piso es de tierra)
disused:leisure=playground (esta el parque abandonado, en desuso)
eggie (2023-05-29 20:04:30+00:00): Top!
Glassman (2023-05-31 20:34:03+00:00): #TIP: we don't use descriptive names in OSM. The tag is sufficient.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136716294
bxl-forever (2023-05-30 14:01:38+00:00): Hello,

The previous changeset stated the situation quite explicitely.

"Ferry to Île Robinson/Robinsoneiland - vehicle=no instead of motor_vehicle to also exclude bicycles from using that service (follow-up of changeset 117426678) "

"motor_vehicle" is a subset of "vehicle".  What was the idea about adding it?  Is there a special requirement or apps that are unable to deal with the "vehicle" key?
Twicko (2023-05-30 14:10:00+00:00): Hi,

Indeed, I added this through StreetComplete, which looks like it doesn't take into consideration the "vehicle" keyword. Therefore, I made the change without knowing that it was already encoded in OSM. Thanks for your input, I'll report it to the developers
Glassman (2023-05-31 20:28:51+00:00): Was this edit part of a task? If so it should be labeled with the task number.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136716495
Glassman (2023-05-31 20:35:59+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.

I see you removed the descriptive name from your last edit - thanks
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136716649
Glassman (2023-05-31 20:36:35+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136716695
Glassman (2023-05-31 20:36:58+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136716728
maisondasilva (2023-05-29 20:28:37+00:00): I already sent this request through Bing Maps, which uses the same system Sunday, but I don't know if it's valid and I'm sending the number of the houses on my street again!
adrianojbr (2023-06-02 18:59:02+00:00): Olá, maisondasilva!

Apesar de ser a mesma fonte de dados, se a edição é feita via o Bing Maps passa por um controle dos funcionários da Microsoft. Diferentemente, se a alteração é feita diretamente no OSM, então fica disponível imediatamente, sem aprovação prévia, somente controle posterior.

Abraço!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136716739
maisondasilva (2023-06-02 20:53:07+00:00): Obrigado pelo aviso adrianojbr
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136716739
Glassman (2023-05-31 20:37:15+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136716746
user_18305684 (2023-06-01 21:34:32+00:00): Bonjour,

j'imagine que tu connais les lieux (je dis cela car rien n'est visible sur les images satellite). Mais il y a un souci dans tes modifications qui sont incomplètes : s'il y a effectivement maintenant un centre culturel dans cette zone (une annexe du bâtiment principal je suppose), il conviendrait de faire du ménage dans les lignes de chemins de fer qui s'affichent toujours à cause du tag disused (qui signifie que les rails sont toujours présents même si plus utilisés) : il conviendrait de remplacer disused par razed pour les sections qui ont été totalement enlevées mais qui faisaient partie de la petite ceinture (je pense que c'est bien de les conserver), voire de supprimer carrément les railways qui n'ont plus aucun intéret (comme le chemin 
116086604 par exemple s'il a été complètement enlevé).

Je te laisse faire ? je ne connais pas les lieux pour le faire moi-même.

A+

nb : j'ai corrigé le multipolygone de Bercy Beaucoup car il y avait des soucis dessus.
nuitsfauves (2023-06-10 07:28:29+00:00): Salut, j'ai tagué Bercy Beaucoup comme centre artistique car je n'ai pas trouvé de type plus proche, mais il regroupe beaucoup de choses différentes (un peu à l'image des Grands Voisins, mais sans réels bâtiments en dur pour l'instant). La description officielle est "Un lieu pour concrétiser et co-construire des projets, toutes sortes d’initiatives expérimentales, artistiques, économiques et solidaires, avec en perspective : l’émergence contributive d’un quartier en devenir, celui de la ZAC de Bercy-Charenton."

Concrètement, aucune ancienne infrastructure ferroviaire n'a été rasée, tout doit rester en disused.
user_18305684 (2023-06-10 18:09:59+00:00): Ok, même si l'icône "Guinguette La Javelle" fait un peu bizarre au milieu des rails.
Note : ton choix de tags pour Bercy Beaucoup me semble bien. J'ai intégré la 3ème zone en tant qu'inner de l'herbe, elle est comme cela plus visible.
Bonne continuation
nuitsfauves (2023-06-14 12:38:56+00:00): Merci toi aussi !
lyoshko (2023-07-10 19:39:25+00:00): звідки інформація про Пантелеймонівську (Академіка Лебедєва, Феофанія)? за посиланням немає цього перейменування. сам живу на цій вулиці і досі вважаю що вона Лебедєва:)
Валентин Ян (2023-07-27 19:29:50+00:00): До цієї вулиці були приписано велику кількість відгалуджень. З 2018 року Київрада дала їм окремі назви. https://kyivcity.gov.ua/news/kivrada_dala_nazvi_novim_vulitsyam_ta_provulkam_u_stolitsi/
lyoshko (2023-07-27 19:44:31+00:00): але немає жодної офіційної інформації про те, ДЕ САМЕ ці ділянки з новими назвами знаходяться.
Живу в ЖК "Казка" дуже давно, і ні разу не чув і не бачив назви "Пантелеймонівська", окрім як на OSM.
Валентин Ян (2023-07-27 19:51:47+00:00): Звісно, бо будинки все одно приписані до Академіка Лебедєва. Інфа є, от наприклад Вікі, навіть координати є https://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9F%D0%B0%D0%BD%D1%82%D0%B5%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%B9%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%BD%D1%96%D0%B2%D1%81%D1%8C%D0%BA%D0%B0_%D0%B2%D1%83%D0%BB%D0%B8%D1%86%D1%8F_%28%D0%9A%D0%B8%D1%97%D0%B2%29?wprov=sfla1
lyoshko (2023-07-28 07:55:39+00:00): координати є. але невідомо звідки їх взяли. може хтось подивився на OSM і позначив на вікіпедії початок і кінець. скоріш за все так і було. жодного достовірного джерела(
Negreheb (2023-06-20 17:21:44+00:00): Servus EinElektriker, du musst bitte ein bissl aufpassen mit den Relationen, die im iD-Editor (der im Browser) relativ einfach kaputt zu machen, dir ist hier irgendwie die Relation der Linie Frankfurt-Salzburg reingerutscht beim editieren. Sieht jetzt auf Anhieb nicht nach einem Problem aus - aber du hast bei der Stieglbrauerei auf dem Gebäude ein Landuse dazugepackt - das ist definitiv falsch. Besserst du das selbst aus, oder soll ich mir das mal anschauen? Ich werde mir mal ein paar andere Sachen von dir auch noch anschauen :)
Wenn du sonst eine Frage hast, kannst du dich auch gern an mich wenden.
Lg
Negreheb (2023-06-21 05:12:16+00:00): User hat sich per PN bei mir gemeldet.
Negreheb (2023-07-10 20:30:30+00:00): EinElektriker hat das leider den landuse nicht behoben, ich habe das jetzt korregiert. 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138353055
Carto'Cité (2026-01-05 15:04:53+00:00): Bonjour.
J'ai restaure highway=footway + area=yes sur https://www.osm.org/way/1116332204, car cela indique que cette surface peut être utlisée pour du calcul d'itinéraires. Cf. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Recommandations_pour_le_routage_pi%C3%A9ton#Surfaces_praticables_par_les_pi%C3%A9tons
Merci,
Antoine de Carto'Cité pour SNCF #Transilien
Glassman (2023-05-31 20:40:57+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

This edit looks like part of a tasking manager project. If so it should include the task number in the changeset comments. 

Also - place=isolated_dwelling is a locality with one or two households. This looks like a village. Can you review these edits - I see you tagged a number of buildings as place=isoloated_dwellings.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136717537
Langlaeufer (2023-05-31 09:19:15+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/400000937
Hallo helste. Was denn für Kunden? Was steht da für ein Schild?
Die Wasserkunstbrücke ist als Rad- und Gehweg ausgewiesen daher designated .
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136717600
user_3547609 (2023-06-01 10:03:32+00:00): Hallo Langläufer, verstehe die Fragen leider nicht. Hintergrund meiner Meldung ist, dass die AndroidApp OsmAnd+ bei meiner Routenplanung keine Überquerung der Wasserkunstbrücke per Fahrrad oder als Fußgänger zulässt. Daher habe ich den erlaubten Zugang für den Abschnitt von designated auf yes gemeldet.
Langlaeufer (2023-06-01 10:58:35+00:00): Das hatte ich schon erledigt deine Daten waren vermutlich veraltet
Langlaeufer (2023-06-01 11:48:31+00:00): Nochmal ausführlich, es geht um 2 Punkte.
1) den Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/400000937 auf dem du motor_vehicle=customer gesetzt hast. Woraus schlussfolgerst du diese Beschränkung?

2) Die Änderungen an der Wasserkunstbrücke. Die hatte ich wenige Tage vorher freigegeben. Ggf hattest du die Daten im OSMAnd nicht aktualisiert, oder ich hatte irgendein Schnippsel vergessen. Jetzt funktioniert das Routing. An foot/bicycle=designated lag es jedenfalls nicht!
user_3547609 (2023-06-01 17:07:53+00:00): hallo Langläufer,
zu Punkt 1: der Weg ist durch das Verkehrszeichen "Verbot für Fahrzeuge aller Art, davon ausgenommen landwirtschafltl. Verkehr und Fahrräder", beschränkt.

zu 2) mit der heute noch einmal aktuallisierten Version klappt bei mir auch das Routing. Dankeschön.
Gruß helste
Langlaeufer (2023-06-01 17:35:29+00:00): Das tagging für 1) wäre dann vehicle=agricultural 
(Verbot für Fahrzeuge aller Art, landwirtschafltl. Verkehr frei)

bicycle=yes (Radverkehr frei)

ich passe es an.

Danke auch, Grüße und weiterhin frohes mappen.
Langlaeufer (2023-06-01 17:36:31+00:00): kleiner Tipp: Das Verkehrszeichentool
http://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/
wille (2023-05-30 12:23:13+00:00): Olá, Breno! Bem vindo ao OSM! Ao mapear piscinas e quadras, pressione a tecla Q após traçar as feições, para os ângulos ficarem em 90º.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136717918
brenobrrt (2023-05-30 18:32:24+00:00): Grato pela orientação
jb54osm (2023-05-29 21:59:30+00:00): Hi Pieleric,

Would you please use / add the adress nodes when you mark a shop / amenity. Thank you.
wille (2023-05-30 12:24:32+00:00): Olá, Keli! Bem vinda ao OSM! Ao mapear piscinas e quadras, pressione a tecla Q após traçar as feições, para os ângulos ficarem em 90º.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136717933
MxxCon (2023-05-31 05:03:16+00:00): Isn't previous name correct? It is named St. Mark's Place, after the nearby St. Mark's Church in-the-Bowery https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St._Mark%27s_Church_in-the-Bowery
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136717976
jmapb (2023-05-31 14:19:06+00:00): True, true... but there are plenty of street and place names whose current spellings diverge from their etymologies.

The only other source for the possessive form is TIGER (notoriously bad in this regard.) Meanwhile, the street signs say MARKS, the imported addresses say Marks, the PAD file says MARKS, GOAT says MARKS, ZOLA says MARKS, DOB says MARKS, and the bus and bike maps say MARKS. I'm pretty sure that's the correct form.

I would have put Saint Mark's Place in as alt_name, but these ways are already tagged alt_name=East 8th Street... maybe Saint Mark's Place would actually be a more useful value for alt_name though.
mariotomo (2023-06-01 12:21:27+00:00): hola y buenos días. El sendero sigue desconectado de la red vial. Si sabe cómo se llega al sendero? Quién tiene derecho a usarlo?
SomeoneElse (2023-05-29 21:28:46+00:00): Oops, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136718271 for a better description.
Glassman (2023-05-31 20:50:25+00:00): It looks like you changed a turning circle to a signal light. I'm assuming that is an error. I've changed it back.

#TIP: square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q" - they will look much nicer.

Also - please limit your edit to a small geographical area. Save and upload before moving. In this case from Colorado to Washington.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136718145
martinst (2023-05-30 11:17:03+00:00): Getrennte Wege wieder verbunden in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136740535
AndresDuhour (2023-10-05 17:49:59+00:00): Buenas tardes, una consulta. Veo noticias como la que copio más abajo, que la ruta 42 se cierra a veces y se abre por cuestiones meteorológicas. Y como está etiquetada en construcción, no está claro si la construcción impide el tránsito. Quería saber si conocés el lugar y efectivamente la ruta está completamente cerrada. Saludos, Andrés
https://www.elchubut.com.ar/puerto-madryn/2023-9-10-20-17-0-habilitaron-la-ruta-provincial-42
adrianojbr (2023-06-02 19:04:14+00:00): Olá, ricardopretto!

Não se deve colocar a bandeira no lugar do nome do posto de combustível.

E os postos de bandeira Petrobras são operados pela Vibra Energia, conforme https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/pt:Vibra%20Energia?uselang=pt-BR.

Abraço!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136718951
mueschel (2023-06-01 10:02:18+00:00): Hi,
did you mean etms instead of etsm?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/849089401
RailandSea (2023-06-01 10:11:24+00:00): Yep, that would be a typo for sure
NorthCrab_upload (2023-05-29 22:40:20+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/606713620
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/613005171

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
user_19426236 (2023-05-29 22:53:28+00:00): This is true
Frans S (2023-06-05 13:15:32+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Please don't use the footway tag in rural areas. Path is a better tag.
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136719674
silversurfer83 (2023-05-30 07:42:24+00:00): Moin Andreas :)

ich hätte da ein paar Hinweise in Form von hilfreichen Wikiartikeln für dich mit freundlicher Bitte um Beachtung:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice

weiter viel Spaß
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136719742
user_19426171 (2023-05-29 23:17:01+00:00): This is true
Hegadaj254 (2023-05-29 23:32:25+00:00): This one way started yesterday
Minh Nguyen (2023-05-30 20:56:06+00:00): Thanks for spotting these license=* tags. A more descriptive key is probably warranted, since ref:license=* isn’t used anywhere else, but we’ll have to consult with the local community on the exact key to use.

Technically, these numbers are the numbers of decisions by local governing bodies. “SYT-GPHĐ” stands for “Sở Y tế – giấy phép hoạt động” (Health Department – operating license), while “CT-CCHN” stands for “Cần Thơ – chứng chỉ hành nghề” (Can Tho province – practicing certificate). It’s typical for any decision/law/license number to contain a slash followed by a descriptor of this sort.
Minh Nguyen (2023-05-30 21:05:56+00:00): Asked in https://www.facebook.com/groups/openstreetmapvietnam/posts/1602562726821377/
marc__marc (2024-08-30 10:14:09+00:00): Hello Minh Nguyen,
any feedback about ref:licence ? mayb ref:<name of the entity that give the licence number> ?
still 6 usecase
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/license
Regards,
Marc
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-06-27 16:22:54+00:00): porque deletou várias ruas aqui?
AgusQui (2023-06-04 23:23:26+00:00): Bauness y el tramo de Rivera en la Plaza son anchas y continuaciones de avenidas, por lo tanto estaban bien como secondary, más allá de que no sean avenidas oficiales
Warin61 (2023-06-06 23:02:59+00:00): Hi,
The relation changed does not cover that section of river. 
See https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14728907#map=15/-33.3051/115.7058

And see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/13653235#map=15/-33.2950/115.7249

If you want change the relation outer way to include sections of way 13653235. 

Note The editor Id does not handle relations well, JOSM does a better job - it is a more complex editor.
Caskade (2023-06-07 00:45:18+00:00): Hey there,
Thanks for the info, I'm a pretty casual editor (and somewhat self-taught). I didn't realise this was the case, thanks so much for this! :D
Caskade (2023-06-07 01:01:57+00:00): I gave it a shot and I'm not really finding any progress whatsoever, and I'm not sure I want to learn a more complex editor. If you could change the relation, that'd be awesome. Sorry for the error.
Warin61 (2023-06-07 07:44:01+00:00): OK.
I took  Way: 13653242 and cut it in two where it crosses from one side of the river to the other. 
See https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/13653242
I took  Way: 13653235 and cut it in two where it crosses from one side of the river to the other. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/13653235

I then placed way 13653235 into the relation 14728907. 
See https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14728907

Note you will have to learn how to do this for yourself. I too am self taught.
Glassman (2023-05-31 20:51:38+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136720806
Glassman (2023-05-31 20:52:07+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136720842
Glassman (2023-05-31 21:00:28+00:00): That looks more like natural=wood instead of a tree row. Can you review this edit?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136720864
Glassman (2023-05-31 21:01:40+00:00): #TIP: follow the roof line when adding buildings. Can you redo these houses?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136720924
Glassman (2023-05-31 20:54:41+00:00): Baseball fields should be tagged as leisure=pitch
pitch=baseball. Since the area is already tagged as Pete Ross Field, the baseball field doesn't need a name. Can you review this edit?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136720927
Glassman (2023-05-31 20:54:59+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136720972
Glassman (2023-05-31 20:56:00+00:00): Same suggestion as the last one. If the fields each have a different name then it is appropriate to tag them with the name.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136720994
MxxCon (2023-05-31 05:24:55+00:00): Hello.
When you merged some of these POIs they got 2 different zipcodes. That can't correct since zip codes are not overlapping.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136721020