piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2023-09-01 16:54:05+00:00): As far as I know motor_vehicle=no is default. That was always the case.
I know moped en mofa=yes is also default. That was not the case in the past.
I checked the Dutch wiki.
Anyway... a motor_vehicle does'nt route through a bollard.
Moped and mofa are also motorvehicles in osm. 
But you may ask it at the Dutch forum.
Greetz..
eggie
eggie (2023-09-01 16:59:20+00:00): Yes.. our messages crossed..
Sure.. a horse is blocked by a bollard.. thats default. So you need to add horse=yes..
New.. moped and mofa =yes.. as default. Thats was not the case in the past. It has changed.
No idea why motor_vehicle is not mentioned in the wiki.

Greetz..
eggie
woodpeck_repair (2025-02-16 20:20:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162585696 where the changeset comment is: revert umstrittene Edits, die mit verschiedenen Sockenpuppen gemacht wurden, s. https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/bitte-erlaubt-mir-die-anderungen-dieses-mappers-zu-revertieren/125882
eggie (2023-09-01 06:02:50+00:00): Hi Skk... Your edits are not correct with motor_vehicle=no
Please stop adding motor_vehicle=no in the Netherlands. 
Add just the exceptions  f.i. motorcycle=yes or horse=yes

That's default. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Tag:barrier%3Dbollard

Please remove motor_vehicle=no

Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2023-09-01 06:03:48+00:00): See routing was correct
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_car&route=52.32323%2C6.72075%3B52.32303%2C6.72097#map=18/52.32298/6.72221
puma515 (2025-02-15 17:24:28+00:00): Es gibt dort keine Parks. 
Daher habe ich sie wieder gelöscht. 
Bitte achte drauf nur dinge zu erfasse die es wiklich gibt.
puma515 (2025-02-15 17:27:03+00:00): das selbe gilt für den teich und die fussgängerzone welches es dort auch nicht gibt.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-08-31 21:00:17+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11159803008
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/226662888

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
ChillyDL (2023-09-04 14:24:08+00:00): Hello Ydel,
thanks for your edits on archaelogical sites. site_type= has been deprecated and replaced by archaeological_site= now, see here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:site_type

So I replaced this in your edit. You might not want to use them any longer. 
Greetings!
ChillyDL
MxxCon (2023-09-01 06:41:26+00:00): Did you mean to tag it as tourism=apartment?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140654049
AndreasTUHU (2023-09-08 10:59:09+00:00): Szia,
Ezekre a fekvőrendőrökre nem lenne jobb a 
traffic_calming=hump ?
A cushion a wiki szerint olyan lassító, amin a nagyobb járművek (=nagyobb tengelytávolság) döccenő nélkül haladhatnak át.
Üdv,
András
Bálint (2023-09-08 13:18:19+00:00): Szia,
Az iD editorban szimplán a fekvőrendőrt választottam, nem tudtam, hogy különbséget teszünk méret alapján. Írd át nyugodtan.
Üdv,
Bálint
5R-MFT (2023-08-31 21:21:21+00:00): adjust phone +34 to automoción ,not Ultramarinos Perez
NieWnen (2023-09-01 19:27:51+00:00): Cześć,
proszę nie uzupełniaj obszarowych/liniowych przystanków autobusowych/tramwajowych w Warszawie.

Został tu przyjęty schemat, aby `highway/railway=platform` dla tramwajów/autobusów było minimalistycznie oznaczane, żeby nie duplikować tagów i nie mieć w nich rozbieżności. Do relacji też nie powinny być wrzucane do linii autobusowych/tramwajowych.

Id niestety lubi sugerować różne rzeczy w tym właśnie takie nadmiarowe uzupełnianie.

Te najważniejsze tagi są umieszczane na węźle z `public_transport=platform`.
BlueButterfly (2023-08-31 21:44:56+00:00): Correction: Source used was Bing aerial imagery
IreuN (2025-03-26 21:25:51+00:00): maxspeed=PL:rural is wrong!
CRCulver (2025-03-26 21:31:12+00:00): How so?
IreuN (2025-03-26 21:33:39+00:00): Use maxspeed=90 + source:maxspeed=PL:rural
IreuN (2025-03-26 21:36:41+00:00): You are using key 'maxspeed' with a value that should be in key 'source:maxspeed'. That is wrong.
IreuN (2025-03-26 21:37:35+00:00): Also I'm seeing many maxspeed tags added by You which I doubt are correct. Example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/259524556
CRCulver (2025-03-26 21:43:13+00:00): According to OSM Wiki's article for maxspeed=, it has been common in a number of countries to add a "XX:rural" value there and not in source:maxspeed. If you feel that this is inappropriate, then I leave it to you to do an Overpass API query of all instances and change them.

If I added a specific number to a maxspeed= tag inside Poland, you can be sure that this was based on personally seeing the speed-limit sign; I did all such mapping on my bicycle.
IreuN (2025-03-26 21:51:21+00:00): Yes, I'm aware of that, but look also at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:maxspeed "Uwaga: W Polsce mogą wystąpić drogi z kombinacją maxspeed=<countrycode>:<zone type> (np. maxspeed=PL:urban). Ta metoda jest przestarzała (należy wykorzystywać source:maxspeed opisany niżej)." 
Meaning - this method is discouraged. 

I will fix what I can, there is Mapillary footage now available in place that I've mentioned. Happy mapping! :)
felipeeugenio (2023-09-01 05:45:20+00:00): 
Estos no son parques. Por favor no insistir con agregarlos una y otra vez.
ProyectHunt (2023-09-01 13:06:01+00:00): Perdón por el error, pero utilicé esa etiqueta porque hacía referencia a plazas, consideraré no utilizarla en futuras áreas verdes interiores
felipeeugenio (2023-09-01 13:20:42+00:00): Hola. No he visto parte del mundo donde se dibujen en OSM areas verdes interiores de esta categoría. Es para jugar algún juego?


Por favor agregar tiendas y elementos publicos relevantes si quiere aportar.

saludos
ProyectHunt (2023-09-01 13:35:38+00:00): Hola, la verdad no, es sólo para mejorar el aspecto de los alrededores. Revisé la descripción de la etiqueta y efectivamente dice que es para sitios públicos, así que no la utilizaré
felipeeugenio (2023-09-01 13:40:14+00:00): Además de las etiquetas, tenemos un chat en Telegram, con un link de acceso que puede encontrar en mi perfil por si quiere unirse. Ahí definimos varios criterios además de los de la wiki.
Saludos
ProyectHunt (2023-09-01 13:52:29+00:00): Magnífico, muchas gracias
map per (2023-09-02 12:50:07+00:00): Hello David White professor,

as you have been told before: Name is the name only (see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only). So please don't use names like "Place to pay entry ticket" (1).

Best regards
map per

(1) https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11159888909
map per (2023-09-02 12:53:44+00:00): Only checked a few of your edits, but it looks like the way you are contributing to OpenStreetMaps is not beneficial for this community project.
map per (2023-09-02 13:06:15+00:00): By the way: OpenStreetMaps is more than just Organic Maps. This is a helpful link for beginners: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/About_OpenStreetMap
David White professor (2023-09-02 14:53:58+00:00): As I have written before, I'm on my way out. Comments like yours have driven me away. Good luck with your project, when actual travelers stop lending you their time. I'll be funneling messages from this community into spam now. Bye.
map per (2023-09-02 15:10:45+00:00): Bye
map per (2023-09-02 15:20:28+00:00): Please don't forget to log out of you OSM account in OrganicMaps to avoid accidentally uploading things in the future.

And if you should ever decide to contribute in a meaningful way you are always welcome in OpenStreetMaps
luisforte (2023-08-31 23:01:10+00:00): Hi
The buildings are at ground level; There is no reason to set a level value other than zero. As the default for this tag is zero, there is no need to use this tag in the specific situations of this changeset.
You can use level=1 for a bridge for example or -1 in the case of a tunnel.
Consider looking at the examples done by other users, it's a good way to learn
—Derp Stars— (2023-09-01 09:35:55+00:00): Thank you very much! I think I understand now
Jose Luis Infante (2023-09-01 15:08:50+00:00): Hola,
he revertido el cambio. Es mejor no hacer pruebas directamente, y nunca guardar al salir.
Te recomiendo mirar la guía para principiantes: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Gu%C3%ADa_de_principiantes
Un saludo!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140655627
eggie (2023-09-01 06:16:47+00:00): Dag Amaluna
access=no icm met andere tags is bijna altijd fout. Ik heb access=no Verboden Toegang verwijderd. Of staat hier een dergelijk bordje?
Fietsen op een G7 voetpad is niet toegestaan. Is het wel een G7 voetpad of wellicht een highway=path? Daar mag je wel fietsen. 
Geen G7 bord dan highway=path gebruiken.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-09-01 06:23:01+00:00): motor_vehicle no, foot yes  horse  no  is allemaal default en hoort niet op een footway.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Tag:highway%3Dfootway
Je hebt trouwens een pad op een pad geplakt.. (duplicated ways) Ik heb dat hele pad verwijderd nu dan kun je nog even kijken wat de juiste tagging hoort te zijn.
MVG
eggie
WoodWoseWulf (2023-09-01 10:52:36+00:00): Hallo, dit footway is nog steeds gedupliceerd- 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1204042968
En
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1047801228
eggie (2023-09-01 11:03:51+00:00): Hi.. I will have a look later on.

I think a bad wifi connection is the cause I did'nt succeed in removing.

Thanks anyway..
eggie
eggie (2023-09-01 13:49:13+00:00): Onderliggende pad nu verwijderd.
Removed duplicated way. 
MVG
eggie
LightAsAFeather (2023-10-19 10:20:56+00:00): Hey!

You moved the letters from housenumber tags to units. The way I read the wiki, this is incorrect.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:housenumber
Says that it may contain letters and other characters.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:*#Detailed_subkeys
The unit key is more for special cases, e.g. a hospital complex.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140656156
Toni100 (2023-10-19 11:05:08+00:00): Hi, thanks for the comment! My reasoning behind this was that the lot doesn't include any letters. Some lots may be divided to e.g. 2b and 2a. In that case you are correct, we can add letters and character to the addr:housenumber tag, but from my source the lots don't seem to have any letters.

I use Turku Opaskartta/Kaavakartta and MML as a source. I speak Finnish/English, if you are more comfortable in either one.
LightAsAFeather (2023-10-19 11:29:02+00:00): Let's just stick to English for general accessibility. 
That's an interesting angle. The A/Bs are probably on the same lot, but I don't think that trying to map this distinction is very fruitful. It falls short of on the ground verifiability for one, as the buildings will just have normal numbers and letters on their walls. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Verifiability

Many renderers will also ignore units.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140656156
nevw (2023-09-01 04:37:12+00:00): Hi
I occasionally ride my bicycle out to Narangba Heights and Ridgeview to map any newly completed roads. I see you are mapping in the area and wondering if you could tell me if there are any newly completed roads to map yet.
whatqm (2023-09-01 06:08:28+00:00): Sorry, I don't know if there are any new roads in the area due to my mapping using satellite images and they don't update often.
nevw (2023-09-01 06:41:35+00:00): Ok, thanks...a ride it is :)
Glassman (2023-09-03 20:07:05+00:00): TIP: Use access=no to indicate park is closed or use opening_hours=closed. Which ever seems most appropriate. County GIS records often have park boundaries that can be added to OSM. Let me know if you need help adding them.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140656474
TheNet1996 (2023-09-01 08:13:02+00:00): Hallo Apollo25,
die Sperrung soll noch bis 8. September andauern - also noch sieben Tage.
Meinst du es macht Sinn sowas in OSM zu erfassen?
Entfernst du das construction-Tag ab dem 8. September wieder?
Des Weiteren soll das Tag, welches du benutzt hast, nicht mehr verwendet werden:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:construction=yes?uselang=de

Über eine kurze Rückmeldung würde ich mich freuen.

Schönes Wochenende :)
Mike
mueschel (2023-09-01 08:09:33+00:00): Hi,
it seems something went wrong here. There are 37 nodes with many foreign tags that don't look like they should be in OSM. 
Could you check and fix this?

This seems to be an import, where can we find the mandatory documentation and discussion of the import?
NorthCrab_upload (2023-09-01 00:00:16+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2946794250

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-10-17 09:07:28+00:00): wycofane jako edycja z konta wandala
julcnx (2023-09-01 12:37:56+00:00): Hey pLoskutov, could you please avoid putting test data into OpenStreetMap and delete any made-up stuff? It's important to maintain the accuracy and reliability of the map for all users. Thanks!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140656772
pLoskutov (2023-09-01 15:58:02+00:00): Yes. I'm sorry, but I need this to decide how to designate a vending machine = fuel. 
Osmandmaps either does not show a vending machine for finding fuel. Or it shows all the machines (for example, water in the same way). 

Now there are a lot of vending machines or barrels drums are designated as a fuel station. This is very wrong!
julcnx (2023-09-02 01:58:43+00:00): Ok. I'd love to see a new icon for vending machine fuel too. However, to make this happen, we'll need to go through a process with OsmAnd. First, we should seek general community agreement on this matter.

Based on earlier investigations and discussions, it appears that the "amenity=vending_machine + vending=fuel" tag combination is primarily intended for detailed mapping of individual fuel pumps within a fuel station (amenity=fuel): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dfuel

OSM is all about community involvement, and with so many different renderers out there, we can't just create our own tag system and tweak data to make it look perfect on our favorite renderer. 😊
pLoskutov (2023-09-02 16:57:45+00:00): The fuel vending machine is not a separate column at a gas station. 
In Thailand, most car refueling locations are independent single vending machines (with or without an operator). As well as barrel drums (with an operator). 

Now they all have tag amenity:fuel, which is misleading and does not allow you to conveniently find a brand gas station that has normal quality, price and quantity of fuel. 

What was discussed on this issue?
pLoskutov (2023-09-02 16:59:45+00:00): In this place I tried to show that osmand has an error in the search - if you try to find vending fuel, it finds all vending (not only fuel)
julcnx (2023-09-03 14:52:11+00:00): Hi pLoskutov, I've been in Thailand for quite a while, about 15 years, so I've got a good handle on the different fuel vending categories here :)

We're facing a bit of a puzzle when it comes to tagging vending machines, and the community didn't quite come to a clear agreement during our last discussion in the Thailand forum.

Like you, I'm eager to find a solution, but I'm currently traveling. When I find some time, I'll put together a new community post summarizing our past discussions and reach out to everyone. We can work together to find a common approach. After that, we can consider submitting a feature request to OsmAnd to update icons and search functions.

In the meantime, it would be appreciated if you could avoid making changes to existing tags. Instead, you could add a note or description. This way, we can make updates more smoothly once we reach a decision.

Thanks a bunch!
pLoskutov (2023-09-03 15:03:25+00:00): I have already introduced several hundred new points as "vending machine fuel", and changed several hundred "drummed fuel" and "minipump". 

Why is there no general solution? - YOU can't call a drum-barrel like a gas station!
julcnx (2023-09-03 15:51:42+00:00): I hear your voice, but remember, our mapping community is bigger than just the two of us. There are folks who've been mapping in Thailand for ages, and their voice counts too.

I can tell you're really into your contributions, and that's awesome! But think about how the original mappers might feel if their stuff got changed without a chat. I'm hoping we can all team up to make those northern Thailand maps even better! I'll send you the community topic link soon, but for now, let me savor the rest of my vacation first :)
julcnx (2023-09-12 08:21:26+00:00): Hi there! I've reached out to experts within the global community, and as you can see in the following link, there's a wide range of opinions on this matter. I'll also attempt to get feedback from OsmAnd regarding their preferences: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/differing-approaches-to-tagging-vending-machines-for-motor-fuel-dispensing-have-caused-confusion/103421
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140656772
evo_evz (2023-09-01 06:06:31+00:00): Sorry from the West traveling East
Fizzie-DWG (2023-12-19 06:33:01+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145277570
oba510 (2023-09-04 06:33:11+00:00): This seems wrong.  Access=no means nobody can use it; these roads are obviously accessible to and being used by ground crew, etc., which would be access=private.
hsimpson (2023-11-07 15:36:03+00:00): Hallo, bei diesem CS ist offenbar ein kleines Missgeschick passiert. Die Bushaltestelle liegt jetzt mitten im Bahnhof Iphofen. Grüße
hsimpson (2025-07-27 21:57:25+00:00): Wenn du hier nicht reagierst, werde ich die Haltestellen wieder löschen
Xanadu_Contractor (2025-02-18 23:32:30+00:00): When you're working on rural roads like this, "Oregon DOGAMI Lidar" is a really good map layer that'll let you see through the trees to get the best view of roads.
jmarchon (2025-02-19 06:25:00+00:00): Oh yeah, it's wonderful. I probably used it here too, going off the tag "source=Bing; DOGAMI Lidar" on the changeset. Thank you though :-)
julcnx (2023-09-01 12:37:13+00:00): Hey pLoskutov, could you please avoid putting test data into OpenStreetMap and delete any made-up stuff? It's important to maintain the accuracy and reliability of the map for all users. Thanks!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140658707
pzs111111 (2023-09-14 07:17:04+00:00): what?
Rukkhadevata (2023-09-14 11:09:00+00:00): According to the on the ground principle of OSM, this boundary is consistent with the actual situation (i.e. the actual jurisdiction area of ​​the local authorities in the two provinces).
Nazlyn (2023-12-01 00:40:12+00:00): The boundary line between Qinghai and Tibet is completely wrong, and there is no such thing as the two provinces actually controlling the line.
TheDutchMan13 (2023-09-01 02:42:37+00:00): *Golf course*
julcnx (2023-09-01 12:07:29+00:00): What is reason you removed old_ref tag ?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140659147
GrabTH_Napittha (2023-09-04 07:24:23+00:00): I'm sorry for my mistake, and I already add old_ref tag. Thank you for information.
CurlingMan13 (2023-09-01 04:36:20+00:00): You also deleted some ways that are DEFINITELY still around and shouldn't have been deleted...

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/569082989

This edit is being partially reverted to readd the bank drivethrough.
CurlingMan13 (2023-09-01 04:39:48+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140660588
Road doesn't exist (2023-09-01 04:40:02+00:00): That is incorrect. Clark Construction owns the building now, and the drive-through is permanently closed. Bank does not exist anymore. Source: I am one of the owners of Clark Construction.
这里没有鱼 (2023-09-01 04:30:02+00:00): 这里不是测试的地方，不要添加不存在的东西。
测试数据已删除
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140660343
impiaaa (2023-09-01 17:43:40+00:00): It was correct before. Two separate traffic signs should be mapped as two separate nodes, even if they're on top of each other.
Black_Diamond (2023-09-01 17:54:34+00:00): When I edited this with the OpenStreetMap editor, it merged the points automatically. I assume that is the desired behavior, since the editor merged them. There were previously warnings about the points overlapping.  The first attempted fix was to add layer values to each sign, but this merging seemed acceptable too.

When I looked at the documentation about signs on a pole, they should be on the same point. Here is that documentation: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:traffic_sign#Tagging

Separate signs should be separated by a semicolon and related parts of a sign should be separated by a comma.
Minh Nguyen (2023-11-15 10:42:38+00:00): The merged node is nonsensical. Since when does a street lamp have a frequency of 1670 kHz?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144045989
Minh Nguyen (2023-11-15 11:28:14+00:00): Changeset 144047223 restores the street lamp and separates the signs by layer.

The documentation for traffic_sign doesn’t really consider the possibility of keys besides traffic_sign on a traffic sign node. Mapping separate nodes isn’t uncommon, and it is common to separate them using different layers. I started a discussion at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:traffic_sign#Multiple_features_for_multiple_signs about acknowledging this approach.
Black_Diamond (2023-11-15 16:36:23+00:00): When you put it that way, it makes sense. Thanks for the change.
Herman Lee (2023-09-08 15:25:20+00:00): 您好，请注意您在编辑人民广场南侧区域时破坏了已有的公交线路，望下次编辑时能注意一下，谢谢
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-03-08 02:30:05+00:00): Reviewed
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140659723
likeToTravel (2025-11-02 01:56:45+00:00): First Locale?
mariotomo (2023-09-01 11:07:46+00:00): hola. reviso tu edición, y en las fotos aéreas definitivamente no veo la "Calle Franklin Anguizola Sagel" dentro de la nueva urbanización.  lo revisas? o lo borro basado en la foto aérea?
mrpulley (2023-09-19 13:22:41+00:00): Just checking - is this based on a survey of the tracks? If the tracks are still visible, it might be better to leave the ways in, possibly with alteration of the tagging (depending on the current status of the tracks). See also discussion at changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/116519029 which concerns earlier edits to these ways.
mrpulley (2024-02-13 12:15:10+00:00): Partial reversion done, as per discussion on talk-au mailing list. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147406352
Anton Khorev (2023-09-22 23:48:12+00:00): Добавляйте пожалуйста точки пересечения проездов с тротуарами, как
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11211214264

С контуром здания вы проезд специально соединили или случайно в точках
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11160143801 и
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11160143799 ? Там въезды в гаражи или что-то подобное?