piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
kingkingHK (2026-03-13 06:57:39+00:00): Repairs https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179665351
genityves (2026-03-16 20:47:27+00:00): Be careful to always square your buildings. If you use iD-Editor, you can do it by pressing Q. It saves a lot of avoidable work in validation
Holly123456789 (2026-03-17 09:51:48+00:00): Thank you for the advice, I learned that after I'd already mapped out a few buildings so some may have been left un-squared. Will remember in the future :)
Comino (2026-03-20 22:43:34+00:00): Company name and address is missing. Incomplete node. Please update.

Edwin Comino
BTC Map
mapnerd🤓 (2026-03-12 12:34:58+00:00): ignore review_requested, accidentally misclicked
Negreheb (2026-03-16 08:27:13+00:00): Servus, bitte keine Namen für solche Fußwege vergeben. Mehr Infos dazu findest du im Wiki unter https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen#name_ist_nur_der_Name 
Ich passe das mal an. :) Alles gute
MappingMore (2026-03-15 02:19:56+00:00): Partially Revert of 179610325
あじさか (2026-03-12 14:32:00+00:00): Thank you for the correction.
I made an embarrassing mistake.
mueschel (2026-03-12 14:45:46+00:00): You're welcome - trivial typing mistakes are trivial to fix :-)
Wildsharky (2026-03-16 07:12:25+00:00): Reverted in changeset id: 179927181
pitfire (2026-03-14 06:26:24+00:00): Hallo Theblondefairy,
bitte acht darauf die phone=Nummer sollte im internationalen (ITU-T E.164)-Format angegeben werden.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone
demon_box (2026-03-12 16:03:06+00:00): Ciao Cevin1992, ti segnalo che in Italia il civico identifica il punto di accesso (entrata) e NON l'intero edificio. Infatti un edificio può avere più entrate e di conseguenza più numeri civici. 
Quindi hai 2 opzioni: 
1. Se conosci esattamente la posizione (entrata) del civico che stai mappando metti tutti i tags dell'indirizzo su un nodo del perimetro dell'edificio (aggiungendo anche il tag entrance sullo stesso nodo);
2. Se invece non hai questa informazione così precisa devi mettere tutti i tags dell'indirizzo su nodo adiacente ma STACCATO dal poligono dell'edificio.
Ho già proceduto con le correzioni del caso. 
Grazie e BuonMapping!
JakovRajić (2026-03-13 18:22:50+00:00): Misplaced it a bit, fixed in changeset/179823618
JakovRajić (2026-03-27 10:47:53+00:00): Tag based on outdated footage, removed in changeset/180495866
iandees (2026-03-12 17:48:57+00:00): Hi! It looks like a node in this changeset was accidentally moved. This can happen when panning the map. The node has been moved back to its previous position.
genityves (2026-03-16 17:30:31+00:00): Make sure to square your buildings when mapping new ones. If you use iD-Editor, you can do that by pressing Q while selecting the building.
flex16 (2026-03-12 14:11:58+00:00): Hi, mir ist folgendes aufgefallen:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13641123602#map=19/50.553268/9.693817&layers=N

So wie du die barrier kerb setzt, bedeutet es: "Auch wenn ich nur rechts abbiege ist da ein Bordstein, den ich überwinden muss." Finde das nicht ganz richtig, weil da ist ja gar keiner.

Hier ist ein Beispiel wie ich das mache:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/50.448878/9.618691&layers=N

Hoffe du hast verstanden was ich meine.
m_fuhrmann (2026-03-12 16:20:57+00:00): Ah! Klar! Du hast Recht. Das ist uncool. Das ist wohl der Faulheit geschuldet :see_no_evil:
So sollten wir das definitiv nicht tun.
m_fuhrmann (2026-03-12 16:26:56+00:00): Habe es mal angepasst. Das Abbiegeproblem sollte nun nicht mehr auftreten.
flex16 (2026-03-12 16:44:16+00:00): Vielleicht solltest du dich echt mal in JOSM einarbeiten. Damit kann man viel effizienter und genauer arbeiten, vorallem bei sowas kompliziertem wie separaten Gehwegen.
flex16 (2026-03-12 16:45:01+00:00): Wenn du jetzt da was konkretes wissen willst kannst du natürlich gerne fragen.
NeisBot (2026-03-12 13:33:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13507008155 v5

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Tow truck depot"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisAgent (2026-03-12 16:45:38+00:00): 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again?
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-06 09:12:40+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags/values in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/185184974
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-03-12 16:52:09+00:00): Why did you change these roads' classifications to trunk? highway=trunk is used for major, nationwide or statewide routes or bypasses, like SR 160 (which connects Las Vegas to Pahrump) or US 95 (major cross-country highway).
Sammyhawkrad (2026-03-12 17:45:48+00:00): Hi Kingsford1234, the name Papa Joe Stadium covers the entire sports facilities, and has already been added. No need to add it to the pitch again, so I will remove it.
Bienson (2026-03-13 01:30:17+00:00): Tag Typo und unsinniges Multipolygon
FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (2026-03-13 08:00:41+00:00): neu angelegt. Fläche ist baulich als Müllumladestation angelegt.
Bienson (2026-03-13 01:31:58+00:00): Widersprüchliche access-Tags bei Zufahrtsweg und Fläche
kingkingHK (2026-03-12 13:55:40+00:00): What's wrong with the bus stop `ref=`s? hkbus-fandom agrees with them. I suppose you have been here recently, so it would be great if you would clarify on the irl situation and what led you to doubt the refs.
vectorial8192 (2026-03-12 15:16:26+00:00): I passed by this area some time before. Notice how there is now only 4 poles, yet hkbusfandom describes 5 (old info). I did not pay too much attention to the refs, but if the poles are relocated, we have reason to believe the refs may be different.
kingkingHK (2026-03-13 13:25:32+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5203129
m@rio (2026-04-08 19:10:11+00:00): Cześć dzbor,
przywróciłem nazwę ulicy zgodnie z https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Znakowanie_dr%C3%B3g_w_Polsce#Nazwy_ulic_z_patronem

pzdr
m@rio
Bienson (2026-03-13 01:34:16+00:00): Typo
FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (2026-03-13 08:45:54+00:00): was gefällt dir genau nicht?
Norbert Dichter (2026-03-12 20:06:28+00:00): Hello, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. Thank you for your contribution. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. Or just hit the Q-key.
Also please keep in mind: many buildings are very close but do not actually touch each other, try to map them close to each other without letting them connect or share nodes with each other, roads, or residential area outlines. In the iD web editor, holding down the "alt" key will keep nodes from "snapping" to each other and accidentally connecting.  Thanks so much for your contribution, Norbert 'Nodi' Dichter, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179758992
Bienson (2026-03-13 01:34:41+00:00): Typo
Bienson (2026-03-13 01:35:29+00:00): Typo
Bienson (2026-03-13 01:35:39+00:00): Typo
FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (2026-03-13 08:47:17+00:00): möchtest du lieber den Lagerplatztag?
Bienson (2026-03-13 01:36:43+00:00): Aber trotzdem öffentlich zugänglich für Fußgänger, nur nicht für Fahrzeuge?
Bienson (2026-03-13 01:37:01+00:00): Typo
faye2go (2026-03-23 12:02:23+00:00): Hi, construction=highway, wie du es hier auf der Faulerstraße getaggt hast ist nicht für kurzfristige Sperrungen gedacht. Hier ist eine beschränkte Bedingung angebracht, siehe Wiki. (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dconstruction) Kritisch ist, dass dadurch das Routing für Fußgänger kaputtgemacht wird (trotz foot=yes). Ich werde das auf der Faulerstraße schnell beheben, auf der Dietenbachstraße kann ich das nicht persönlich überprüfen.
Schwäbi (2026-04-30 08:32:56+00:00): Sorry, konnte es mir jetzt erst anschauen. Vielen Dank für die Hilfe! Ich habe die Sperrung nun auch auf Im Grün und alles auch zeitlich erweitert, da die Sperrung noch länger anhalten wird.
Bienson (2026-03-13 01:41:34+00:00): Wie bereits geschrieben - access=private überlagert vehicle=private, daher ist vehicle=private nicht nötig (aber nicht falsch).

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access
Stifi0815 (2026-04-06 18:52:12+00:00): Hallo shafar181,

Es scheint, dass du das bicycle=no auf bicycle=designated gesetzt hast. Es gab dazu schon einiges an Diskussion. Siehe:
- https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/waldwege-besitzer-beschwert-sich-und-lasst-loschen/89951/13
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/94293584#map=17/47.087649/15.393573

Hast du das berücksichtigt bzw. gibt es neue Erkenntnisse wieso das nun wieder auf bicycle=designated gesetzt werden kann? Vielleicht kannst du dazu auch einen entsprechenden Kommentar im Forum (Link siehe oben) abgeben, sodass nicht wieder ein  Edit-war beginnt. Danke!
DerKaiserschmarren (2026-04-07 10:03:21+00:00): Radfahren/MTB-Fahren ist in Österreich im Wald generell nur auf dafür ausgeschilderten wegen erlaubt.
Wenn es also nicht explizit am Weganfang ausgeschrieben ist, ist es automatisch verboten.
Siehe dazu: https://www.oesterreich.gv.at/de/themen/reisen_und_freizeit/freizeit-in-der-natur/freizeit_im_wald/Seite.3750060
shafar181 (2026-04-07 14:40:55+00:00): Hallo, danke für die Rückmeldungen! Vorab, ich wollte als Wanderer diesen Pfad benutzen und erkunden. Da er augenscheinlich fast ausschließlich von Bikern benutzt wird, habe ich den Weg umgangen. Einer der Grundbesitzer richtet am "Karolinenhof" (Startpunkt der Trails) aktuell einen Montageplatz für Mountainbiker ein. Eine Beschilderung dazu werde ich nochmals hinterfragen und mich melden...
iandees (2026-03-12 17:49:30+00:00): Hi! It looks like a node in this changeset was accidentally moved. This can happen when panning the map. The node has been moved back to its previous position.
FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (2026-03-13 06:05:02+00:00): Thank you!
Comino (2026-03-20 22:47:38+00:00): Private Members Club not allowed on OSM. A publicly accessible physical address is an absolute must. Please delete this POI.

Edwin Comino
BTC Map
sid6point7 (2026-03-12 15:19:09+00:00): @ToniE 
Nun sieht es so aus sind alle Findings gelöst. 
https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/DE/BY/DE-BY-MVV-Analysis.html#bus_WBB

Sehr schön! Danke für die Hilfe!
Grüße
Bert
Negreheb (2026-04-07 09:56:38+00:00): Servus shafar181, hier dürften dir ein paar Fehler unterlaufen sein. Kannst du vielleicht sagen, wie du zu den werten kommst? Du hast ja einiges gelöscht und einiges hinzugefügt :) 
Ich frage, weil es auch im Forum bereits angesprochen, wurde, vielleicht kannst du dich da kurz melden?

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/waldwege-besitzer-beschwert-sich-und-lasst-loschen/89951/23

Viele Grüße, Stefan
Dimitar155 (2026-03-12 16:08:30+00:00): Thank you for your edit! These turns are not allowed at this location. Only right turns are allowed from the residential roads due to the tram traffic. From the main road only right and through turns are allowed. I've reverted this change accordingly.
ChamblyCanal (2026-03-16 16:15:26+00:00): Hello Dimitar155. I appreciate your explanation for the reversion of my edit. Thanks and happy mapping!
NeisBot (2026-03-12 14:27:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/205024175 v5

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Trailer dealership"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-20 17:33:04+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180170907
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
NeisBot (2026-03-12 14:30:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13583271382 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Upholstery shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-20 17:33:05+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180170908
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
agilenewt21 (2026-03-12 14:40:46+00:00): Photo survey, see Flickr album linked below.
https://flic.kr/s/aHBqjCMVmi
I'll leave the photos online for as long as I can but it probably won't be forever.
NeisBot (2026-03-12 14:36:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/10161935917 v4

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Japanese tea house"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-20 17:33:08+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180170911
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
fortera_au (2026-03-12 21:09:09+00:00): Hi, what imagery did you use for this, since ESRI shows a former carpark now under construction, and Bing doesn't line up with what you've drawn?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179761311
Ky_AT (2026-03-17 04:40:03+00:00): Hi fortera_au,
Thanks for this feedback and the reminder. I will take extra caution against outdated/old imagery sources. Changeset reverted to its previous state.
ivanbranco (2026-03-14 21:16:12+00:00): Hi lecosm,

what's the meaning of height=10-15?
it's a multi stemmed tree, and those are the measures of the two trunks
or
it's a height range, because the real value is unknown?

thanks and good mapping
MappingMore (2026-03-13 09:34:09+00:00): Partially Revert of 179711648
NeisBot (2026-03-12 15:00:39+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 15 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1488045321 v1 | 15 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179762086
Cat D (2026-03-12 15:08:06+00:00): These "crossings" are from the old parking lot that is no longer in use. The entire area is fenced off and inaccessible by foot or car traffic as the buildings are being demolished and the site is being redeveloped. The street, as indicated, is no longer usable by pedestrians or drivers.
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-12 15:14:18+00:00): Hello, thanks for your answer.

However, with this changeset several crossings appear to have been created unintentionally. You can see this by comparing the following two ways:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1488045321
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/964990984

Could you please review and correct these crossings?

Thanks.
Cat D (2026-03-12 15:47:50+00:00): I don’t understand what you mean by correct the crossings?
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-12 15:55:36+00:00): Hello,

You can see the "crossings" in the following two ways, which now appear to be duplicates:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1488045321
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/964990984

In my opinion, only one of these ways should exist.

I hope this helps clarify the issue.
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-12 15:15:32+00:00): Same again. Please check these ways:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1317024863
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1488045676
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:07:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
agilenewt21 (2026-03-12 15:03:00+00:00): I decided to add the details anyway, in case anyone is willing to do any deeper digging to work out whether it still exists or not.
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-12 15:16:39+00:00): And again:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/21421432
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1488047842
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/21421534
NeisBot (2026-03-12 15:03:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 8 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1021222643 v3 | 8 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/9665839433 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179762262
iandees (2026-03-12 17:50:02+00:00): Hi! It looks like a node in this changeset was accidentally moved. This can happen when panning the map. The node has been moved back to its previous position.
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-12 18:19:12+00:00): Thanks @iandees
iandees (2026-03-12 17:50:22+00:00): Hi! It looks like a node in this changeset was accidentally moved. This can happen when panning the map. The node has been moved back to its previous position.
SimonPoole (2026-03-12 17:03:20+00:00): Again a typo this was actually work on Mettembert.
NeisBot (2026-03-12 15:12:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/643421613 v5

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Building technology system"
---
Zum Beispiel könnte eine neutralere und sachlichere Version deines Textes lauten: "Gebäudetechnik-System"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-03-20 17:33:09+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/179771792
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-04 13:08:30+00:00): Cleaned up remaining SEO spam and incorrect tagging in changeset 185090076

https://osm.org/changeset/185090076
iandees (2026-03-12 17:50:21+00:00): Hi! It looks like a node in this changeset was accidentally moved. This can happen when panning the map. The node has been moved back to its previous position.
HellMap (2026-03-27 13:16:21+00:00): Lūdzu nezīmēt krustojumus ar neeksistējošiem ceļiem - šeit nav atsevišķu `link` kā https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1488052037 vai https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1488052038 , ja nekas nav pa gadu mainījies.

Šeit pārejai nav saliņa https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12255838615 , ja katras brauktuves pāreja ir iezīmēta atsevišķi. (Un otra pāreja nav līdz galam iekartēta.)

Šie mazie celiņu laukumu posmi kā https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1488052035 nav `highway=pedestrian`, bet `area:highway=footway`.
Đuro Jiří (2026-03-12 20:47:19+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13641126379
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:00:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:11:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
NeisBot (2026-03-12 15:33:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13603529389 v5

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Farm and machine shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-06 09:13:30+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags/values in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/185185019
MappingMore (2026-03-15 00:12:55+00:00): Partially Revert of 179702671
hebolz (2026-03-15 16:48:20+00:00): @MappingMore May i ask what exactly (and why) you reverted? This is CS 179763561; you wrote 179702671, but that is none of my CS??
MappingMore (2026-05-28 09:44:15+00:00): Hi hebolz,
Thank you for your feedback. I will make sure to add direct changeset URLs instead of just number in changeset description. Happy Mapping!
kingkingHK (2026-03-13 02:01:35+00:00): I don't think `natural=wood` should be used for a single tree row.
vectorial8192 (2026-03-13 07:41:35+00:00): I don't think those are tree rows. I think those are general areas where trees are planted to grow / may naturally grow.
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:12:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
mueschel (2026-03-15 13:04:50+00:00): Hi,
the tag 'gas:gn' isn't used in other places.
What does it mean?
HellMap (2026-03-27 13:17:31+00:00): Kādēļ ceļam https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/34582752 nomainīts kods no V1047 uz V9? Līdz ar to arī maršruta relācija vairs neatbilst. Arī Baldones iela nav nosaukums šim posmam.

Kādēļ izdzēsti tilta celiņi https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1317156828 un https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1324455641 lai iezīmētu tieši tur pat?
MappingMore (2026-03-13 11:36:20+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:179805825
eggie (2026-03-12 18:48:36+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:01:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports