piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
YomanNH (2025-11-06 09:42:26+00:00): Hej,
czy tu:
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1446507166
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1446507167
cokolwiek się dzieje? Jest jakiś plac budowy, czy tak jak sugeruje nazwa, jest dopiero planowana budowa?
uprkos (2025-12-06 12:15:32+00:00): Sprawdziłem na miejscu. Jest to całkowita fikcja. W miejscu etapu 1 jest parking. Etap 2 i 3 to las.
uprkos (2025-12-07 20:18:02+00:00): Usunąłem i naniosłem zgodnie ze stanem w terenie.
SomeoneElse (2025-11-02 01:52:04+00:00): Something has gone very wrong here https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1624090/history had 677 members before you edited it and only 664 afterwards.
Did you get any warnings on screen?  If not, I'd suggest that you log a bug with Vespucci to get the problem looked at.
SomeoneElse (2025-11-02 02:11:58+00:00): Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19508737 basically the same as https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19774128 ?  If so, the shorter, partial one (the one I added earlier) can be deleted - but near Marsden I think the https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19508737#map=19/53.604303/-1.940405&layers=T route is correct and the https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19774128#map=19/53.604416/-1.940647&layers=T one is not.
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2025-11-02 02:30:31+00:00): I've re-added the memberships so that https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1624090/history is now 679.
Verbandstyp2 (2025-10-31 14:00:54+00:00): + 1 Gebäude (Reihenhaus) gelöscht - gibt es nicht
Dpenm001 (2025-10-31 14:47:31+00:00): To the south there are several circular plots that I've marked as hedges, I'm not sure if they're supposed to be an isolated dwelling. 

I might have made a mistake by not marking what looks like a hedge in the centre of the task area (running southward), but it doesn't seem to be marking a boundary so I left it blank.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174022621
Dpenm001 (2025-11-01 08:52:11+00:00): #UNMappers (forgot to this in my previous comment)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174022621
Frans S (2025-11-07 11:40:19+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Here, as far as my judgment is correct, There are no settlements or dwellings visible. 
About hedges.  You mapped quite a number of hedges without any clear proof of a hedge.  Hedges can be identified by a continue line .
Please add all hedges within view of highways/paths. (mapped or unmapped)
Best regards and keep mapping
felipeeugenio (2025-10-31 17:58:03+00:00): Hello. Please check with strava which imagery to use before just realigning. Bing is not commonly the best aligned in Chile. That is Esri, but either way, check with strava.

regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174022821
Erlen Dur (2025-11-02 23:38:13+00:00): Hi Felipe, 

I do it a different way. I am using Osmand with Google Satellite Aerial tiles and hourly updates. 
The current OSM data corresponds quite good with the Google tiles. 
So I use this a reference, but of course can´t use Google Satellite in JOSM. But I with a bit adjusting and verifying my changes in Osmand I could manage to realign a few things. And I can apply an imagery offset to Bing or ESRI. In the end I have to decide for the imagery, to which the already given OSM data corresponds most. 
However, I focus more on adding businesses and such, because this is more important for other travelers and other apps and website, which are using the OSM database. 
The realigning was just a bit trying out. But well, I am going to check with Strava, but don't understand why Strava. Is there any reason? 
Saludos, Andre
felipeeugenio (2025-11-03 17:03:52+00:00): Hello. 
It is forbidden to use Google information. 

But even so, Google imagery alignment means nothing in terms of accuracy. If it would be available for OSM usage, it would be just another provider.

Use Strava is you want to align something and, in case you want to do massive alignments, please engage the local community in telegram.

Regards
NeisBot (2025-10-31 14:15:41+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Jauerstrase 22 Nurnberg"
NeisBot (2025-10-31 14:15:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisBot (2025-10-31 14:15:44+00:00): Zum Beispiel könnte eine neutralere und sachlichere Version deiner Beschreibung lauten: "Jauerstraße 22 Nürnberg"
---
(Auto-translation)
DD1GJ (2025-10-31 14:30:57+00:00): Revert SPAM, block requested
pitscheplatsch (2025-10-31 16:15:48+00:00): Danke für das Reverten, DD1GJ.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174023900

Für mich auch "interessant" zu sehen, was der Bot aus einem Sch**** Description Tag dann immer noch erstellt ... 😏

Hier in dem Beispiel halt gut zu erkennen, dass der neue Eintrag einfach ein hohes Potential für Murks hat.

Viele Grüße, Pascal
Dimitar155 (2025-11-04 08:56:48+00:00): Може да добавите и оператора. Ако е M-Texx, Texcycle или Texaid, би трябвало да приемат и обувки.
mechka (2025-11-05 12:47:20+00:00): Благодаря, ще го направя за бъдещи контейнери за рециклиране.
Dpenm001 (2025-10-31 14:34:58+00:00): I deleted some of my own lines (to the west), they might have been older hedges. The new lines follow the boundary with the bare/dry land. 

Some lines stop at the task boundary even though the hedge continues.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174023307
Dpenm001 (2025-11-01 08:51:35+00:00): #UNMappers (forgot to this in my previous comment)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174023307
Roydon Olive (2025-11-01 12:35:44+00:00): Hi, I reverted this in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174060044

I was just at this location a couple of hours ago, the map data before this revision was correct. This is an active construction project that just finished these roads in the last couple of days, unless your sources are that recent they are out of date. Even looking at the link you provided you can see the parts that are marked complete are more closely matched by the map data before this change.
ihorkovtun_lyft (2025-11-05 07:15:25+00:00): Hello Roydon Olive,

Thank you for bringing this issue to our attention. I did some more research. I found out that you are right. I apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused, and I appreciate your help in improving the map.

Best regards,
Ihor
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:45:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321633 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - United States
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:39:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321388 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Canada
bernward1 (2025-10-31 16:42:56+00:00): Im VRM ist unter network die Kurzform üblich. Auch wenn der Id-Editor vorschlägt die Langform zu nehmen.
Bevor der Id-Editor die vorschlug waren 100% der Buslinien mit der Kurzform getagged.

übrigens:
Wichtiger bei Buslinien ist es Unterbrechungen zu beseitigen. Der geänderte Busnummern zu korrigieren.
MadestCat (2025-10-31 19:17:47+00:00): Hallo, 

also basierend auf Festlegungen im Forum sollte man die lange Schreibweise nutzen:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/what-is-the-definition-of-a-public-transport-network/117250/3

Außerdem entspricht der Nanebs-Vorschlag des iD dem Wikidata-Eintrag: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q2516481

Daher finde ich einfach ungefragt Korrekturen gemäß Forum und Wikidata zu revertieren nicht nett.

Grüße
bernward1 (2025-10-31 20:48:05+00:00): Ich finde es nicht nett langjährige Praxis einfach zu ändern.

Das Forum in nicht der geeinegte Platz um das zu entscheinden. Denn es kommt darauf an, ob die Abkürzung oder der lange Name lokal gebräuchlich ist.
Beim VRS, VRM und VRR ist der gebräuchliche Name die Abkürzung.
(Ganz abgesehen, dass die Abkürzung für Abfragen auch praktischer ist.)  

Historisch gesehen kam der Vorschlag für den langen Namen durch Doppeldeutigkeiten. AVV (Augsburg und Aachen). 
Beim VRM, VRS und VRR gibt es aber keine Doppeldeutigkeiten.
bernward1 (2025-10-31 21:05:22+00:00): Ich habe mal eine KI gefragt und folgende Antwort bekommen:

"Eine einheitliche Festlegung (nur Langform oder nur Abkürzung) existiert nicht, die Entscheidung hängt oft von der gängigen lokalen Praxis und Wiedererkennbarkeit ab. In vielen Fällen ist die Abkürzung üblich, insbesondere wenn sie gebräuchlich und eindeutig ist."
MadestCat (2025-10-31 21:45:10+00:00): Hallo nochnmal,

hmm, so klar ist das garnicht. Beispielsweise Bus 621 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/233023

Wenn man da die Versionen durchgeht sieht man, dass das networkl mehrmals von mehreren Mappern auf die Langversion "Verkehrsverbund Rhein-Mosel" geändert wurde. Nur du hast das dann immer wieder auf VRM zurück geändert.

Warum ist das Forum nicht die beste Anlaufstelle? Wo soll man sowas denn sonst klären? Entscheidest du das dann einfach?

Hier ist meine Anfrage bei ChatGPT btw:
https://imgur.com/a/e1W9p0y

Grüße
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:45:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321633 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - United States
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:45:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321633 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - United States
eggie (2025-10-31 15:42:48+00:00): Hans  Check svp met bv editor iD wat je hebt gedaan. Je laadpaal heb ik nu van het midden van de weg gehaald waar die vast niet staat, maar ellicht jij wel de juiste locatie?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-10-31 15:31:15+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback   Beter PDOK actueel gebruiken als achtergrond. Bing is verouderd en ligt vaak verschoven.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
TheNightRider (2025-11-04 06:43:51+00:00): I just saw this restaurant while driving by tonight near closing, but took a photo to map it because it's new in like the last month. You already mapped it and did it nicely with all the right tags and syntax. Yay! Gonna check it out, cuz Thai food is great & we don't have a good place in this area.
Ruslan Fatih (2025-11-01 14:02:02+00:00): Привет! 👋
Обратил внимание, что вы убираете слово «улица» из названий

В OpenStreetMap это считается ошибкой: в теге name=* должно быть указано полное официальное название, как оно написано на табличках и в официальных документах.
Правило описано здесь:
📘 osm.wiki/RU:Good_practice#Название_улиц
«Не сокращайте названия. Тег name должен содержать полное официальное название объекта, включая слова „улица“, „проспект“ и т. п.»
Предлагаю вернуть полные формы, например:

name=проспект Абая
Спасибо за вашу работу над картой!
eggie (2025-10-31 15:32:49+00:00): Ik denk dat hier iets verkeerd is gegaan doordat je bent gaan schuiven met de kaart.
Zie https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=174024921

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-10-31 15:38:04+00:00): Schade aan Waardsebaan  hersteld.
Dat was één grote knoop geworden.
Tip. Check steeds wat je hebt gedaan en doe dan pas een upload.
Schuurtjes worden meestal als building = shed getagd.  Een barn vind je meer op een boerenerf.
Up to you.
MVG
eggie
OMG1984 (2026-07-26 15:51:53+00:00): it was removed 2026
vicente lopez 2021 (2025-11-04 11:14:28+00:00): https://www.argentina.gob.ar/noticias/en-la-capital-de-la-rioja-el-gobierno-nacional-habilito-el-nuevo-distribuidor-vial-de-la
vicente lopez 2021 (2025-11-04 11:15:42+00:00): https://www.argentina.gob.ar/noticias/en-catamarca-vialidad-nacional-construye-una-colectora-sobre-la-ruta-nacional-38-en-el
user_5359 (2025-11-07 08:02:46+00:00): Hello! I didn't see any building on the different aerial images. Exists this object?
NeisBot (2025-10-31 15:24:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisBot (2025-10-31 15:24:42+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Auto body and restoration shop"
NeisReview (2025-11-01 18:52:03+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/174076212
Dimitar155 (2025-10-31 20:55:15+00:00): Не виждам причина n11584677527 и n13272461201 (+техните другарчета) да са отделни възли. Ако има по-голямо разстояние (примерно 5 метра или една кола/паркомясто разстояние) би било логично да са отделни възли.
Fraxi (2025-10-31 21:11:04+00:00): За n11584677527 - като минавах просто писах бройките. Още в първите версии съм ги добавял като отделни. Трябва да ги обединя по-натам, това съм пропуснал.
Иначе за n13272461201 и другия сив контейнер, може би разстоянието да е било около 1 кола място. Имаше такива - не чак 5 метра, но...
После може да ги видя. Ейй, само кусури търсиш :P
Dimitar155 (2025-10-31 21:37:03+00:00): ОТК :)
Dimitar155 (2025-10-31 21:49:08+00:00): Между другото, имаш пълното право да ме замеряш с моите камъни по моята глава. От 33 444 (случайно стана числото) промени, 100% има поне няколко със съмнително качество. Особено сред първите 500 примерно (:
Fraxi (2025-10-31 21:56:24+00:00): Не бе, спокойно, имаш право. Просто, съгласи се(и си представи), че някога си добавил такива контейнери поединично(по 1 за цвят, дори и 2 жълти, но 1). И ходиш по улиците, гледаш да не кесиш много и е някак си неудобно да изтриваш тепърва дубликатите и да редактираш оставащите кофи(или да обединяваш)...Особено ако не са 1 или 2. Такива неща-най-добре от PC
Dimitar155 (2025-10-31 22:17:40+00:00): Прав си, но не съм се замислял по този въпрос, защото не ми се е случвало на терен. А не ми се е случвало, защото тактично съм минал предварително (или следварително) подобни локации с overpass turbo.

[out:json][timeout:25];
{{geocodeArea:кв. Манастирски ливади}}->.searchArea;
nwr["amenity"="recycling"](area.searchArea);
out geom;
Fraxi (2025-10-31 22:33:58+00:00): Мерси, от полза е!
eggie (2025-10-31 16:01:21+00:00): Feed back.

Hoi..
Lijkt me correct gedaan zo.
Mvg
eggie
JJIglesias (2025-10-31 16:58:47+00:00): Hola y Gracias por agregar las contrucciones, no obstante se requieren que las mismas, sean adecuadamente escuadradas.
Para ello marcas la construccion y aplietas la letra Q, o usando el boton derecho del Mouse te aperece una figurita cuadrada, si aprietas alli la edificacion se escuadra adecuadamente.

Gracias
Bienson (2025-11-01 01:22:04+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174043655

Nr. 20 ist hier:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/532703594
fmc_6 (2025-11-04 09:04:20+00:00): Hallo Stefan, du hast hier angegeben, dass auf dem Blumberger Damm ein Radschutzstreifen besteht. Auf deinem eigenen Mapillary Bild vom 01.11.2025 sieht man davon nichts. Stattdessen ein 240er Schild (temporär) auf dem separaten Steig. Wie kommt die Änderung zu "lane" zu stande?
Danke dir!
Quelle: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=812023624778843
StefanHRT (2025-11-06 04:34:33+00:00): Hallo, 
Aufgrund der falsch platzierten Note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5026637 hatte ich die Änderung vor Sichtung gemacht (ich weis, sollte man nicht machen), Aber da der von Nord kommende Radweg an der einen Fußgängerampel auf die Straße geführt wird, suggeriert es, dass hier noch eine Radspur kommt (analog der fertigen östlichen Fahrbahn). Kannst Dich gerne mit Tobias besprechen, ob Ihr das rückgängig macht und es später wieder angefasst wird, oder ob es jetzt so bleibt. Tobias kann mich gerne auch auf anderem wege kontaktieren, da bin ich die kommenden Wochen besser erreichbar. VG Stefan
TrickyFoxy (2025-10-31 23:02:29+00:00): 👋 К сожалению 2гис использовать нельзя
TrickyFoxy (2025-10-31 23:03:11+00:00): И Яндекс.Карты тоже. Яндекс.Панорамы можно
Tornek (2025-11-01 08:19:32+00:00): Есть ген. план поселка ну и уличные указатели которые я вижу каждый день
Tornek (2025-11-01 08:21:07+00:00): Другие сервисы использовались только для спутниковых фотографий для ориентации на местности т.к. фотки openstreetmap довольно устарели
TrickyFoxy (2025-11-01 10:49:36+00:00): Другие спутники тоже нельзя. 

Для осма доступны другие снимки. В правом меню редактора есть кнопка «Настройки фонового изображения». Выберите там спутниковые снимки ESRI — они свежее
rempshaener (2025-10-31 16:39:31+00:00): Hallo,
aeroway=helipad und emergency=landing_site widerspricht sich. Beides zusammen geht nicht.
Viele Grüße
Spieki (2025-10-31 18:38:48+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. Wurde geändert
joost schouppe (2025-11-20 14:18:55+00:00): Je hebt hier een dubbel gemaakt, dit ziekenhuis was (uiteraard) al gemapped. Je kan dit bewerken door op de outline van de site te klikken. Ik heb het voor je aangepast: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/87660373
trigpoint (2026-04-25 14:16:52+00:00): Is this translation verifiable, as in is there a sign?

Cheers Phil
czebureks (2025-11-03 17:57:44+00:00): Cześć, dzięki za tę edycję! Jeżeli możesz, popraw proszę dokładność ścieżek z użyciem podkładu "Cieniowanie rzeźby terenu ISOK" - dzięki niej będzie dokładnie widać, którędy przebiega ścieżka. A tutaj są jakieś ławeczki: https://www.openstreetmap.org/ ?node/13272498345
Vastuvid23 (2025-11-03 20:39:37+00:00): Ścieżkę odwzorowałem na podstawie śladu GPS. Jest też widoczna na starych mapach geodezyjnych. Dzięki za sugestię. Może znajdę jutro chwilę z komputerem i poprawię tak jak piszesz. Faktem jest, że dane z zapisu śladu bywają niedokładne. Chociaż mówimy o wahaniach rzędu kilku kroków. Czasem linia na mapie jest grubsza. A ławeczki, śmietnik i miejsce na ognisko są tam od jakichś 5 lat. Dokładnie przed wejściem na rampę. https://photos.app.goo.gl/VkchACfP2U1jmdms6
czebureks (2025-11-04 16:45:58+00:00): Ok, dzięki za korektę! Jeszcze tylko zapytam: to palenisko z ławeczkami jest po stronie południowej czy północnej od ścieżki? Bo nie powinno być przyklejone do drogi ani ścieżki. I dałbym tam leisure=firepit; tourism=picnic_site to jednak miejsce z trochę bardziej rozbudowaną infrastrukturą.
joost schouppe (2025-11-20 14:20:53+00:00): Zelfde opmerking ivm dubbele ziekenhuizen. Ik heb de naam aangepast naar AZ Oostende - Damiaan, zo staat het ook op hun website: https://www.azoostende.be/naar-az-oostende/naar-de-ziekenhuizen
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-11-01 12:14:30+00:00): Hi!

Please be careful not to touch the roads around your business. I will have to revert becuase it broke routing in this area. Thanks!
Langlaeufer (2025-10-31 18:05:31+00:00): oops, wurde der Weg entsiegelt?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174029063
pavvv (2025-10-31 17:54:44+00:00): Już przedyskutowano na forum obniżenie tej drogi. Czy przebiega przez tę drogę jakakolwiek relacja uzasadniająca primary? Główną funkcją DK92 dla dalekobieżnego tranzytu jest ominięcie opłat, więc wjazd na autostradę w takim miejscu mija się z celem.
Każde podwyższenie drogi na primary trzeba przedyskutować na forum.
notmyproblem1 (2025-11-08 11:35:06+00:00): Come mai hai rimosso 
short_name=Via 25 Aprile?

Fammi sapere.
giulcenc (2025-11-08 11:55:34+00:00): Non era mia intenzione cancellare il nome alternativo della via, è stato un errore di cui non mi sono accorto durante le altre modifiche.
Lo posso ripristinare appena accedo al PC fisso nel pomeriggio, oppure lo puoi fare tu se hai la possibilità di farlo in tempi più brevi?
notmyproblem1 (2025-11-08 13:23:37+00:00): certo caro, faccio io =D
notmyproblem1 (2025-11-08 16:02:34+00:00): riesci a farlo te? grz
notmyproblem1 (2025-11-08 16:02:55+00:00): nvm l'ho fatto io scusami
giulcenc (2025-11-08 17:03:19+00:00): Corretto io.
silversurfer83 (2025-10-31 18:59:45+00:00): Ja moin,

du hast hier Ladestationen eingetragen. Was genau wird da geladen?

Und eine Fahrschule sollte als eigener Punkt innerhalb des Gebäudes erfasst sein. Dieses Gebäude ist sicher keine "Schule".

Und hier ist noch einmal der HInweis auf

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174029727
silversurfer83 (2025-11-22 16:29:00+00:00): Hab aus dem Gebäude wieder ein allgemeines Gebäude gemacht und die Fahrschule auf einen eigenen node gezogen
aTarom (2025-11-01 14:46:56+00:00): Hola, gracias por editar, me parece que el uso de barrier wall si ya hay pared de edificio no es correcto, cuando se le tiene que dar propiedades, por ejemplo altura es un engorro y se tendrá que ir recortando lo que es edificio de lo que realmente sea muro.
Saludos
Glassman (2025-11-01 15:56:27+00:00): I'm not sure sidepath is the right tag. Is there a physical path that bikes can use, if so, I'd add the path and show bicycle=yes. Can bicycles and pedestrians use the gate? If so you can access for them. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bicycle%3Duse_sidepath and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174029845
5m4u9 (2025-11-01 06:10:45+00:00): Hola, para mí está mal doblemente eso de degradar la cancha a sport_centre sin serlo, en todo caso sería "un pseudo coliseo" siendo audaz.

El área de la cancha debería quedar, hay etiqueta para decir si tiene techo.

Lo ideal sería "añadir" el techo sin borrar la cancha, ambos conviven. 

Siguiendo esta lógica de sustituir canchas por sport_centre, ¿qué sucede con los verdaderos sport_centre que hay en muchos barrios? habría dos etiquetas solapadas anidadas, la del exterior y la de la cancha.... :(
trial (2025-11-06 21:19:12+00:00): ele= würde Sinn machen!
Peer van Daalen (2025-11-07 07:56:54+00:00): Stimmt! Ich hab gerade keine Zeit für am PC was zu machen. 

Kannst Du gerne modifizieren ;-).

Gruß | Peer
AgusQui (2025-11-04 04:34:26+00:00): Hola sdlvcxre, cuando se cambia un nombre de una calle, y en especial en una avenida tan importante, es importante indicar el nombre viejo con el tag old_name ya que este nombre se seguirá usando durante un tiempo. También hay que actualizar las direcciones addr:street.
Si necesitas ayuda me avisas.
También hay que vigilar si los cambios se hacen efectivos en la realidad, ya que es habitual que tarden mucho tiempo en reflejarse.
Константин Гам (2025-12-16 11:49:26+00:00): Здравствуйте! Не стоит создавать дубли, обновляйте карты
silversurfer83 (2025-10-31 19:04:41+00:00): Gude :)

Die Wikipedia ist wegen inkompatibler Lizenzen nicht als Quelle für uns geeignet. Nur so als Hinweis.

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174030391
AndyB_66 (2025-10-31 18:43:43+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sr:Good_changeset_comments