piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mona_magdy (2026-03-17 09:45:14+00:00): Hello Aarav 588,
Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap in the United Arab Emirates. I noticed that you added the 'ref' tag for some streets, for example:
(w1465312042, w216080808, w95097247)
I checked the Mapillary tracks to look for any road signs that might support these edits, and I didn't find any sign containing your value-added. Could you please let me know the official source you used to add these ref tags?
Just a quick note: when editing ref tags, it’s necessary to have an official or reliable source for the change and to include that source in the changeset. It’s also recommended to keep changesets small and add a short description of the edits, according to OSM guidelines. For more information, please check this link:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset
Regards,
mona_magdy
mona_magdy (2026-03-17 09:41:04+00:00): Hello Aarav 588,
Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap in the United Arab Emirates. I noticed that you added the 'ref' tag for some streets, for example:
(w139375947, w139375946, w307759093, w307759111, w139375945, w139375944)
I checked the Mapillary tracks to look for any road signs that might support these edits, and I didn't find any sign containing your value-added. Could you please let me know the official source you used to add these ref tags?
Just a quick note: when editing ref tags, it’s necessary to have an official or reliable source for the change and to include that source in the changeset. It’s also recommended to keep changesets small and add a short description of the edits, according to OSM guidelines. For more information, please check this link:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset
Regards,
mona_magdy
gurglypipe (2026-03-16 11:31:25+00:00): Nice to see some more of the meadows being mapped, nice work :)
NorthYorkshire (2026-03-16 17:08:04+00:00): Thanks! A long but rewarding process when the map starts to look nice and green.
iandees (2026-03-14 22:45:20+00:00): Hi! It looks like a node in this changeset was accidentally moved. This can happen when panning the map. The node has been moved back to its previous position.
arafqus (2026-03-14 22:16:47+00:00): #CasbahUpdatePlan
VictorIE (2026-03-26 03:45:52+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1488976072

There are two building:part=anta 

I'm not sure what the tag is meant to be.
b-unicycling (2026-03-27 00:55:02+00:00): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anta_(architecture)
i thought it was better than building:part=yes.
IvaKraljić (2026-03-16 21:50:39+00:00): The wrong tag has since been fixed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179973000. #OptimoRoute
arafqus (2026-03-14 22:16:23+00:00): #CasbahUpdatePlan
DressyPear4 (2026-03-15 22:40:39+00:00): Olá, caminhos devem ser conectados em outras vias, e não ficar "soltos" no mapa
eggie (2026-03-15 07:46:03+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Dat klopt inderdaad. Het deel voor de brug heeft een uitzondering voor fietsers. .. oneway:bicycle=no   Dat het ik toegevoegd. 

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Rainero (2026-03-14 22:46:01+00:00): Korrektur: changeset/178760243 wurde zurückgesetzt.
Till_btn (2026-03-14 22:58:49+00:00): Korrektur: Statue seit 2013 an der Brausebrücke, seit 2021 am neuen Standort
cuzi (2026-03-17 18:49:39+00:00): Hello, you marked this whole road as inaccessible: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/364066139

If I understand your comment correctly, it should still be possible to go from Tidewater Park across the bridge to the other side of the creek? Or is it even possible to go north to reach Whipple Road?
Thomas Goyne (2026-03-17 18:55:45+00:00): Whoops, good catch. Whipple to Smith/Dyer/Alvarado-Niles by using the bridge is fine, and I failed to split the road at the gate.
cuzi (2026-03-17 19:05:14+00:00): Thanks, I'll fix it!
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-03-15 23:10:06+00:00): Why you think it has a name in German?
OlasMapy (2026-03-16 20:24:28+00:00): można dodawać name;de do gmin co mają niemiecką nazwę
Map-Peter (2026-03-19 00:08:17+00:00): Hallo DL1EKC,
 
warum hast du hier die Informationen entfernt das "Sa-Mo, PH off" ?
 
PS:  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours
DL1EKC (2026-03-20 18:00:15+00:00): Hallo Map-Peter,

weil der Laden von Samstag bis Montag geschlossen ist.
Map-Peter (2026-03-23 22:17:11+00:00): "Sa-Mo, PH off" sagt aus das "der Laden von Samstag bis Montag geschlossen ist" + Feiertags (PH) auch.  
Diese Informationen zu entfernen ist falsch.
DL1EKC (2026-03-23 22:32:22+00:00): Alles klar,

da werde ich dann einen Bug report bei Organic Maps machen. Die App parsed "Su, PH off" als "Sonntag 24 h offen und Feiertags geschlossen". Danke.
Nater Kane (2026-06-05 18:03:58+00:00): I'm curious what "horse route refinements per website" means. Where were you able to find maps or explicit information for horseback riding routes? Asking because I've looked for this and the "Horse Trails Map" is low fidelity and doesn't actually map the trails. https://mda.maryland.gov/horseboard/Documents/HorseTrails.pdf
Thanks!
Not Just 4 Bikes (2026-07-28 00:58:44+00:00): That map is only a locator map to find places to ride. If you go to Patapsco Valley park webpage you should be able to find maps showing horse trails. I would have to dig to find them again. Part of my reasoning for trying to get horse trail info into OSM is that it's so hard to find information buried on myriad state websites and disjoint maps. I do the best I can! Patapsco has an overwhelming number of trails; talking to one of the local groups (e.g. TROT MD) may be your best resource.
joel56dt (2026-03-15 00:54:55+00:00): I like this idea but I think the implementation is not right.

It is helpful to include "stop=all" for 4-way stops and "stop=minor" for all others.

I noticed you have removed this helpful information from some 4-way stops. For example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/336174599/history
maxwellward (2026-03-15 00:59:08+00:00): I don't believe this is "incorrect", as "all" is only really useful when it's on a single node, as routers don't need to know about all way stops when the stop signs are split.

That being said, the additional data doesn't hurt, and could be useful to someone looking through the data, so going forward I will include stop=all/minor on the split signs where applicable :) 

Thanks for your comment
Senihtu (2026-04-22 15:06:45+00:00): Hi!
Ein  Umzug durch die halbe Stadt aber addr:street ist gleich geblieben? Oder ist das jetzt Barnecker Straße 1?
Kannst Du da noch mal drüber schauen?
happy mapping!
Wurzel3 (2026-04-22 15:52:30+00:00): ja, das ist mir tatsächlich entgangen beim Umzug der Node, danke fürs drauf achten. Ich habe es jetzt korrgiert.
NeisBot (2026-03-15 00:45:48+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13648674160 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Chiropractic office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-03-23 05:33:04+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/179964485
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-17 01:24:04+00:00): Cleaned up remaining SEO spam and other tagging for POI in changeset 184204842

https://osm.org/changeset/184204842
VVC_TI (2026-04-01 09:00:46+00:00): Het lijkt erop dat de verbinding om vanuit centrum Brussel naar de buitenring te gaan nog ontbreekt. Deze staat ook op de bewonersbrief.
GR-menneke (2026-04-01 09:49:01+00:00): Dag VVC_TI, deze verbinding heb ik er wel degelijk opgezet volgens mij. Kan mogelijks wel in een andere wijzigingset gemeld zijn.
VVC_TI (2026-04-01 10:07:12+00:00): Ik kan hem nergens vinden, het gaat hier om reeds bestaande wegen die niet zijn afgebroken in deze fase van de werf.
GR-menneke (2026-04-01 10:41:37+00:00): Dag VVC_TI

Nu weet ik weer waarom ik dit nadien weer weggehaald had. Dat was deze communicatie van Werken aan de Ring:
https://www.facebook.com/share/1CWR1yC7bF/

Was dit maar één weekend van toepassing?

Groetjes
GR-Menneke
VVC_TI (2026-04-01 11:09:57+00:00): Dag GR-Menneke,
dat was inderdaad maar een tijdelijke maatregel, dat bericht is inderdaad nogal onduidelijk. 
bedankt.
GR-menneke (2026-04-03 06:27:31+00:00): Dag VVC_TI,
intussen is het nodige weer aangepast. Dank voor de bevestiging.
GinaroZ (2026-03-23 13:30:25+00:00): Thanks, there's a few bits still 30mph on the map if you want to sort those :) https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2mGe
mk407 (2026-03-24 02:59:29+00:00): Thanks for pointing that out, I've fixed those now. The remaining 30mph section around Station Park is explicitly signed as such, so should remain :)
jm428 (2026-03-15 20:54:07+00:00): according to the wiki, access=yes means "The public has an official, legally-enshrined right of access; i.e., it's a right of way." which I don't think is true here.
I think it would be better to just remove the access tags altogether if none of them are marked as no trespassing.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
Channel91 (2026-03-15 21:48:39+00:00): What you're saying makes total sense. So what I find a bit odd is that if I add new road as a driveway the default for access is a grayed "yes," which I understand to mean as an implied default. Is this the setting you are suggesting?
jm428 (2026-03-16 01:57:46+00:00): Yeah you are right that the grayed values are usually the implied defaults so it is strange that they are all set to yes. I asked some people who are more experienced than I am. One said they usually don't set the access tag unless it is signed but said that access=destination is most correct (except for the section connecting the sidewalk to the road, if there is a sidewalk, because pedestrians can use that to get to the road). The other said "Driveways can be assumed to be access=private (+access:delivery=yes), but it doesn't hurt to tag that access explicitly."

So I would probably leave the access tag blank and assume that whoever is using the data knows how driveways should be used, but using access=private or access=destination isn't wrong either.
iandees (2026-03-15 02:46:01+00:00): Hi! It looks like a node in this changeset was accidentally moved. This can happen when panning the map. The node has been moved back to its previous position.
Warin61 (2026-03-16 00:26:15+00:00): Good .. that fixed the razed bit for the Syd 2 Melb XPT.

Niggle .. the ways were not in sequential order .. I fix that for the Syd 2 Melb XPT.
You may want to check the others? I use to find problems:  
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=144.94284&lat=-37.80718&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=ptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes%2Cptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes
LachlanTansey2009 (2026-03-16 07:48:28+00:00): I've looked over them all. They should be in order now.
allaboutmikey (2026-03-15 23:33:55+00:00): Also moved the boundary of the residential area so it doesn't cut off this house and neighbouring new house sites.
Waldis2009 (2026-03-15 09:47:48+00:00): Просьба удалить пакет правок, откатить до предыдущей версии
Calibrator (2026-03-15 19:52:19+00:00): Откатывать пакеты правок очень просто. Вы и сами можете это освоить. Один из методов - поставьте себе крутой редактор,JOSM. Кстати, с его помощью вы сможете не толькео откатывать пакеты правок, но и гораздо проще вам и удобнее будет редактировать всё-всё-всё на карте OSM. Поставить JOSM на компьютер вы сможете легко. Читайте об этом тут: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:JOSM. А для отката пакетов правок добавьте в JOSM Модуль (плагин) "Reverter" (через пункт меню "настройки" в JOSM). Если по какой-то причине JOSM не сможет затянуть в себя модуль "reverter" - то включите временно VPN на своем компьютере. Это поможет при настройке.
Waldis2009 (2026-03-15 09:20:01+00:00): Просьба откатить этот пакет правок
aduxas (2026-06-04 20:10:14+00:00): You changed motorway_link to trunk.  Why?  You should at least have changed the access tags for horses, pedestrians and cyclists.  You have allowed them here with your edit.  The classification as motorway_link was correct.  See OSM the wiki page.
HantDX (2026-03-20 18:16:52+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1489005887 это здание на самом деле уже снесено.
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 08:59:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:12:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:01:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:12:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:06:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 08:58:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:08:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 08:58:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:12:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 08:58:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:08:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:11:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:12:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:01:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:08:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:01:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:06:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:06:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:08:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
NeisBot (2026-03-15 04:39:39+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 8 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1305048430 v4 | 5 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/4652816223 v6

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179883008
NeisReview (2026-03-23 05:33:06+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/179916245
https://osm.org/changeset/179963871
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:00:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:07:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:07:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 08:58:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:07:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:01:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:12:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 08:59:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:06:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:10:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:08:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:10:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:01:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
rajdhani (2026-03-17 06:45:57+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:179984773
CIMDigital (2026-03-16 16:50:43+00:00): It is not SEO spam. It is for my client business.
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-17 06:32:21+00:00): Thank you for your reply here.

Your added description was not factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Feel free to add your business again.
rivermont (2026-03-18 00:07:03+00:00): What is NCCH Orthos? You are adding it as a source on tons of features
Darnight14 (2026-03-15 06:40:17+00:00): 这啥渲染 名字怎么跑到康体场地中心了==
NeisBot (2026-03-15 05:48:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 10 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1489035883 v1 | 7 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/11222904495 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179883931
NG218 (2026-03-17 01:10:19+00:00): Try keeping these changes localized their respective areas as much as possible. No need for this to span between the Harrisburg and Philly areas.