piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
TrickyFoxy (2025-02-26 10:32:33+00:00): 👋После того как нарисовали здание не забывайте нажимать Q, чтобы выпрямить его

Также в правом меню редактора есть кнопка «Настройки фонового изображения». Выберите там спутниковые снимки ESRI — они свежее
justynabu (2026-06-10 19:05:21+00:00): Czy na tej drodze 1360451590 (i pobocznych) nadal jest remont?
felipeeugenio (2025-02-26 12:35:38+00:00): Hola. La ciclovía ya estaba agregada, solo que formaba parte de la calle. No hace falta agregarla otra vez.
Pero además veo que agregó dos ciclovías, una en cada sentido. Está bien eso?
stasiu512 (2025-02-25 22:42:46+00:00): Źródło: https://www.drmg.gdansk.pl/index.php/organizacja-ruchu/740-rozpoczynaja-sie-prace-na-ul-klosowej
SomeoneElse (2025-02-27 10:22:10+00:00): Currently the relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4283214 is just a line with one member https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/317689837 ?  I'm guessing that "Part of Ausestown" is not actually a thing but "Causestown" is?
b-unicycling (2025-02-28 18:08:37+00:00): line deleted from relation, relation deleted
SomeoneElse (2025-02-28 21:39:30+00:00): Thanks!
eggie (2025-02-26 07:20:09+00:00): Dag Almuts
Tip...
access=no is bijna altijd altijd verkeerd gebruikt. Verboden Toegang voor iedereen. 
motor_vehicle=designated  betekent dat motorvoertuigen juist zijn aangewezen om hier te rijden. Dar zal toch niet. Bedoel je destination? Bestemmingsverkeer. 
Ik pas even wat aan.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-02-26 07:23:46+00:00): Het gesloten hek heb ik ook opengezet voor voetganger en fietser.
access=no en designated verwijderd.

MVG
eggie
NieWnen (2025-02-26 17:32:11+00:00): Jest taki tag jak wikipedia, który
tutaj się prawdopodobnie lepiej sprawdzić zamiast linka w source.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikipedia
MatiMatix (2025-02-27 02:56:47+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162995378
sykul (2025-02-26 12:44:57+00:00): Hi. Thanks for your contributions in the area. Just a couple of things. Firstly, actual map data should be reserved for real things. If you want to make a note of something that needs mapping, there is a function for this on the right of the osm.org homepage.
Secondly, almost all of your changeset titles are just "minor changes". It's more useful to other mappers in the area if you describe a little bit what you added or changed. Even just a few short words.
Please let me know if you need any help with anything.

Bonjour,

Merci pour vos contributions dans la région ! Juste quelques petites remarques :

Tout d'abord, les données de la carte doivent être réservées aux éléments réels. Si vous souhaitez signaler quelque chose qui doit être cartographié, il existe une fonction dédiée à cela sur la droite de la page d'accueil d'osm.org.

Ensuite, presque tous vos titres de jeux de modifications sont simplement "modifications mineures". Il serait plus utile pour les autres cartographes de la région que vous décriviez brièvement ce que vous avez ajouté ou modifié, même en quelques mots seulement.

N'hésitez pas à me contacter si vous avez besoin d'aide pour quoi que ce soit !
Guilhem G (2025-02-26 22:22:59+00:00): Merci pour ces retours et informations. 
J’ai changé ma manière de soumettre les changements pour prendre en compte votre retour. 
Cdlt 
Guilhem
Guilhem G (2025-02-26 22:24:16+00:00): PS : ce rond point je ne me sens pas encore capable de le faire ;) 
Sans la vue aérienne j’ai peur de m’y perdre. 
Je me fais la main en ce moment.
sykul (2025-02-27 18:33:42+00:00): Merci beaucoup, les changements sont plus clairs maintenant.
Ne vous inquiétez pas, un autre cartographe verra la note et corrigera la jonction. Ou si j'ai le temps ou si je passe par là, j'enregistrerai le trajet sur Panoramax et je la corrigerai.
NeisBot (2025-02-26 05:01:07+00:00): Hello, thank you for your contribution.

I noticed that some of the tags and descriptions you've used appear to be related to #SEO #spam. I recommend reading the following page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Spam

Could you please confirm if your map edits here were intentional?

#MapWithoutSpam #TagSmartNotSpam
NeisRevert (2025-03-13 13:22:43+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/163570484
balint36 (2025-03-26 15:04:15+00:00): Hello there!
Could you provide source for electrification and ETCS L1 system for the line #136 in Hungary?
The official Hungarian infrastructure register does not mention it: https://www.kapella2.hu/ehusz/vonalak/vonal?vonalId=34012390
I'm looking forward to your answer.
balint36 (2025-03-28 17:06:25+00:00): So?
balint36 (2025-04-04 15:04:39+00:00): Sorry, due to the right source I've citet before, I must revert this changeset.
https://www.kapella2.hu/ehusz/vonalak/vonal?vonalId=34012123

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164514005
Baloo Uriza (2025-02-26 14:20:46+00:00): Spelling out "Place" instead of "Pl" is good since computers can't tell if that's supposed to be Place or Plaza, but can abbreviate both easily.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162952814
tastrax (2025-02-26 09:55:39+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, +61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features#Phone_Numbers .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
svnpnce (2025-02-27 02:34:55+00:00): Thanks, it's been a minute since I've added phone numbers 👍
NorthCrab_upload (2025-02-25 23:51:52+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/519454450

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
map per (2025-03-07 11:07:42+00:00): Wegen review_requested:
Die Änderung sieht gut aus, danke!
nevw (2025-02-26 12:06:40+00:00): These road extensions appear not to exist either
TheSwavu (2025-02-26 21:33:37+00:00): None of it's on the Sentinel-2 image from a week ago. I have removed it.
Nathan_A_RF (2025-03-09 10:01:26+00:00): Red route road markings do not denote a trunk route. This road will soon be trunk however due to the Silvertown Tunnel opening soon. Also, please do not use trunk_link on roundabouts.
Syl (2025-02-26 08:56:40+00:00): Bonjour, la falaise que vous avez supprimé est toujours visible sur les images aériennes. Elle a été détruite ?
LeRhodanien (2025-02-26 12:09:03+00:00): Bonjour @Syl, parlez-vous d'une ligne sans attribut qui se trouvait au niveau du Mont July (près de Bourg-en-Bresse) ? Si tel est le cas, je l'avais supprimé car je pensais qu'il s'agissait d'une erreur de ma part, d'autant plus que Openstreetmap m'avait indiqué une erreur pour celle-ci lors de la demande de sauvegarde. N'ayant pas vu d'attributs, j'ai crû à une erreur.

J'essaie de trouver un moyen de la retrouver et de la rétablir mais je n'y arrive pas, je vais tenter de trouver un moyen. J'ai commencé la cartographie sur OSM il y a 1 semaine maintenant, donc tout nouveau contributeur... Désolé et merci pour votre vigilance !
Syl (2025-02-26 12:18:48+00:00): Je parlais de celui-là : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/492815763/history

A ma connaissance il n'y a pas d'outil simple pour annuler en partie un groupe de modifications. Tandis qu'il existe par exemple https://revert.monicz.dev/ pour annuler un groupe entier.
Si c'est confirmé que c'est une erreur je peux m'en occuper.

Merci pour vos contributions et bienvenue !
N'hésitez pas si vous avez des questions.
LeRhodanien (2025-02-26 12:56:44+00:00): Je ne me souviens pas avoir supprimé une falaise dans le secteur de Mont-Saint-Martin. C'est très surprenant. Je peux donc vous confirmer qu'il s'agit d'une erreur...

Merci à vous.
Syl (2025-02-26 15:09:57+00:00): Je viens de l'annuler.
Chaaach (2026-04-21 15:27:17+00:00): Bonjour @LeRhodanien, je m'intéresse au node 12619410238 que vous avez créé (Pylône de Radio B), qui n'est pas sur cartoradio de l'ANFR (mais qui existe bien sur le site à côté du gros pylone de 55 m). Pour ma curiosité personnelle, comment avez-vous pris connaissance de son usage ? Je n'ai pas vu de panneau ou de référence sur place.
LeRhodanien (2026-04-21 19:58:58+00:00): Bonsoir @Chaaach. Je suis technicien bénévole pour plusieurs radios locales de la région. Il n'y a effectivement pas de panneau sur place, mais on peut facilement trouver l'information sur le site de l'ARCOM (ex CSA) par exemple.
Chaaach (2026-04-22 13:56:06+00:00): Merci @LeRhodanien je n'avas pas pensé à l'ARCOM ! J'ai trouvé la fiche de l'émetteur sur leur site:
https://www.arcom.fr/radio-et-audio-numerique/radio-fm-dab/emetteur/01-bourg-en-bresse-ramasse-2--radio-b--fm
NorthCrab_upload (2025-02-26 01:20:46+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12619418736

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
MatiMatix (2025-02-26 04:47:20+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162956765
NeisBot (2025-02-26 05:56:34+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits, particularly those concerning the names you've added or modified.

It seems that some of these names are a bit unusual.

#NameCheck #NeisLab
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-02-26 08:42:09+00:00): This looks like an edit for Farming Simulator.
Please don't add fake grasslands or names.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-02-26 09:24:19+00:00): This changeset also added duplicate roads.
pitscheplatsch (2025-03-03 14:31:47+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162963394
Taya_S (2025-02-26 07:51:25+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17329
Kovoschiz (2025-02-26 09:03:43+00:00): Please read and respond to previous changesets. Don't create different accounts to dodge questions.
Kovoschiz (2025-02-26 09:07:46+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153239869
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154786130 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157093615
Kovoschiz (2025-02-26 09:08:46+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162248937
Taksine (2025-02-26 03:49:16+00:00): 立马停止乱改道路等级！你画点建筑不好吗？
by H (2025-02-27 14:10:39+00:00): 不可否认的是，信宜市的道路单双行道问题急待修改，至于道路等级则需商榷。我希望我们联系shu0410，尽快达成共识。
Taksine (2025-02-27 14:20:52+00:00): 我跟shu0410正在QQ群聊这个问题，你有无QQ账号，要不进来一起聊聊这个问题？群号290278518
by H (2025-02-27 14:21:25+00:00): 我不知我是否获得了进群同意😁
NeisBot (2025-02-26 05:01:08+00:00): Hello, thank you for your contribution.

I noticed that some of the tags and descriptions you've used appear to be related to #SEO #spam. I recommend reading the following page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Spam

Could you please confirm if your map edits here were intentional?

#MapWithoutSpam #TagSmartNotSpam
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-26 05:54:09+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/162955543
habi (2025-03-03 08:13:56+00:00): Ciao grtrrrr

Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap!
Schön machst du hier mit und hilfst, die Karte und die Kartendaten zu pflegen.

Wo wäre denn Yumi Hana richtigerweise?
Bis jetzt gibt es in OpenStreetMap nur eine Filiale in Basel und eine in Zürich.

Ä Gruess usem Liebifäud,
habi
habi (2025-03-03 08:15:13+00:00): Ah, laut https://yumihana.ch/pages/filialen ist doch eine Filiale hier.
Es macht Sinn, wenn du diese nicht auf dem Adressknoten des Theaterplatz 8 erfasst, sondern als eigenständigen sog. 'Point of Interest'.
NieWnen (2025-02-26 17:30:20+00:00): Jak coś, to wystarczy samo "Błysk"
"Myjnia Ręczna" można pominąć bo wynika to z tagów (automated=no), ale jak najbardziej w official_name może być :)

Natomiast jeśli chodzi o wielkie litery, to raczej unikamy. Dopuszczone głównie dla skrótowców.

To samo dot. N-CONCEPT 

Jeśli chodzi o manufakturę, to raczej też unikamy "/" w nazwach, bo może być specjalnie traktowane – głównie do obsługi wielu języków/nazw.
MatiMatix (2025-02-27 02:49:25+00:00): Nawet jeśli caps lockiem mają te firmy w KRS nazwę?
NieWnen (2025-02-27 07:45:06+00:00): Tak, KRS tutaj nic nie zmienia. 
Te mogą trafiać do official_name.

Co do nazw ogólnie to staramy się, żeby nie zawierała skrótów (nie mylić ze skrótowcami), była nazwą powszechną, nie była CAPSem itp.

Co do tej 1 części z "Myjnia Ręczna" to z tym bywa różnie, bo możesz zauważyć, że np. większość w Warszawie piekarni jest zmapowana jako "Grzybki", czy "Oskroba" i tak też mają w szablonach i pomijane jest słowo "Piekarnia", ale w niektórych POI to np. stanowi integralną część nazwy, bądź tworzy kontrowersje przy oderwaniu.
MatiMatix (2025-02-27 13:35:55+00:00): Super, dziękuję za wyjaśnienie i wskazówki :)
Mashin (2025-02-26 08:19:11+00:00): Hey,
I think that looks all good. I also changed the road to service, because it seemed to me that the building at the end of it is not a family house.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-17 00:42:49+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165050151
Đuro Jiří (2025-02-26 12:03:40+00:00): Ciao Markuz_,
se attività commerciale non esiste più, nodo non si cancella, però si mette, che negozio è vuoto.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dvacant
Per questi casi è buona applicazione StreetComplete.

https://t.me/+uCPMZf61adtiNDQ8 
Se ti serve aiuto.
Saluti e buon divertimento
Markuz_ (2025-03-02 05:03:07+00:00): Grazie mille, non ero a conoscenza di questa cosa ancora. D'ora in poi implementerò ciò che mi hai detto.
Grazie mille ancora!
mavl (2025-05-13 15:03:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
BCNorwich (2025-02-26 10:48:48+00:00): A power line only needs a layer tag if it crosses another similar feature, thus to determine which item is above the other.  The name of the line would not be "high voltage".  The ref would not be "power=tower". I've amended.

The line is tagged as cables=3 so your triple wire. triple wire tag removed.
BCNorwich (2025-02-26 10:39:49+00:00): Hi, The name would not be "power=tower".  Tag removed.
Pinstall (2025-03-03 03:01:47+00:00): squared the hand drawn rectangles
TheSwavu (2025-02-26 21:46:00+00:00): Hi, 

https://ballaratopendata.org.au/dataset/ballarat-shared-paths is licenced as CC-BY 3.0. To use this is OSM you need to have got a waiver signed by Ballarat council.

Have you done this first? 

Thanks.
Hannah_F_ (2025-02-26 23:22:58+00:00): Thank you @TheSwavu - I am reverting my changes and seeking to get a signed waiver from City of Ballarat :)
NeisBot (2025-02-26 05:52:23+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits, particularly those concerning the names you've added or modified.

It seems that some of these names are a bit unusual.

#NameCheck #NeisLab
BCNorwich (2025-02-26 10:31:54+00:00): Height would not be 0, levels would be 1, usually each word in a formal name should be capitalised. I've amended.
BCNorwich (2025-02-26 10:21:38+00:00): Fiction reverted.
BCNorwich (2025-02-26 10:10:37+00:00): Hi, The building:levels tag is to describe the number of visible levels (floors) in the building. So in this case it would be 1 not 0. I've amended.

Regards Bernard
BCNorwich (2025-02-26 10:16:37+00:00): Avenida Brasileira reverted back to residential.  The value of the access= tag should be in lower case, "yes" not "YES".   Actually, in this instance, it's not needed at all, it's absence implies yes. I've amended.
Baloo Uriza (2025-02-26 15:14:50+00:00): asphalt sidewalks?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162956384
ZLima12 (2025-02-26 04:42:06+00:00): Under the new trunk classification guidelines, the road could only be sufficiently important to justify trunk or motorway between the two other motorways.
NieWnen (2025-02-26 17:19:25+00:00): Było już wrzucone na obszarze, teraz jest duplikat. 

Albo obszar albo punkt :P

W tym przypadku lepszą opcją wydaje się być obszar.
MatiMatix (2025-02-27 02:47:12+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162995215
gregorywpower (2025-02-26 05:11:43+00:00): source should be https://data.carync.gov/explore/dataset/curb-ramps/table/?refine.compliance=Compliant&refine.recommendedaction=None&refine.obstructed=No
NeisBot (2025-02-26 05:53:06+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits, particularly those concerning the names you've added or modified.

It seems that some of these names are a bit unusual.

#NameCheck #NeisLab
CurlingMan13 (2025-03-13 00:47:42+00:00): Good edit.  :)
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162957154
NorthCrab_upload (2025-02-26 05:23:53+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nieprawidłowa wartość addr:postcode.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12619962848

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1296665381

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12193145903

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
ivanbranco (2025-03-10 12:10:45+00:00): Hi danielpuentesc,

please don't write values in capslock. write Hidalgo instead of HIDALGO, Funeralez Manzano instead of FUNERALES MANZANO ecc.ecc.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-02-26 05:30:48+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1198092531

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
ZLima12 (2025-02-26 06:11:40+00:00): Hello,

When editing, please try not to delete the original object only to remap it from scratch. Since you are using JOSM, you can install the plugin named "utilsplugin2" (see Edit>Preferences>Plugins), and then use the "Replace Geometry" tool. With that, you can move the original house out of the way, draw the new shape, select both the old and new shape, and then press Ctrl+Shift+G. That will keep the history of the old house while also allowing you to make a new shape.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162957473
ZLima12 (2025-02-26 06:15:20+00:00): Also, you don't need to split up your edits so much; you can do one changeset per group of houses instead of one changeset for every house.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162957473
NeisBot (2025-02-26 17:01:03+00:00): Hello, thank you for your contribution.

I noticed that some of the tags and descriptions you've used appear to be related to #SEO #spam. I recommend reading the following page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Spam

Could you please confirm if your map edits here were intentional?

#MapWithoutSpam #TagSmartNotSpam
literan (2025-02-26 20:15:17+00:00): это не название. это тип магазина
Velke Zar (2025-02-26 20:22:37+00:00): Ну так то конечно, но какое название ещё можно быть у ЖД касс. В этих будках ничего кроме них нету
literan (2025-02-26 20:34:23+00:00): значит, у них нет названия (имени собственного), как и у газетных киосков и безымянных шавух. Выбирайте в программе пункт "Здесь нет вывески с названием", он поставит тег noname=yes
mavl (2025-05-13 15:07:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
pwbriggs (2025-02-26 06:10:22+00:00): Here's how I got the numbers I did:

According to a 1980 Seattle Landmark Board record on seattle.gov [^1], the towers on the southwest side of the building are 165ft (50.2m). The document also states that the concrete stepson the SW side are 20ft tall. By OSM `height=` rules, those 20ft are included in the height of the tower (165ft from street level, and the SW side is the lowest side of the building [^2]), but I assume the numbers in the document already include those 20ft. Therefore, we can tag the towers as `building:part=tower` and `height=50.2`.

Now the tricky part. The main building (i.e., everything but the towers on the SW side) is *mostly* flat [^3]. However, I can't find any official (or even unofficial) numbers about the height of that main building section. Referencing an official image of the southwest side of the building [^4], however, we can see that the distance between the top of the concrete stairs and the base of the main roof is approximately one-third the distance between top of said stairs and the top of the towers. Because we know the distance from the stairs to the tower-top to be 165-20=145ft (see previous paragraph), we conclude that the base of the main roof is around 48+20=68ft above street level. We add an additional 5 or so feet for the (low-angle) main roof, and get 73ft (22m) height for the main building.

That means we can tag the main building outline with `height=22`, and then to acknowledge the fuzzy estimation we did, we can also add `height:accuracy=estimate` and `height:source=image;extrapolation`.

Thank you for reading. Feedback is always welcome and would be much appreciated here.

[^1]: https://www.seattle.gov/Documents/Departments/Neighborhoods/HistoricPreservation/Landmarks/RelatedDocuments/st-james-cathedral-designation-nomination.pdf
[^2]: Local knowledge
[^3]: Key word here is mostly. Notably, the corners on the northwest side of the building are significantly shorter, as the bulk of the cathedral is cruciform, but that can be updated later.
[^4]: https://www.stjames-cathedral.org/Tour/images/stjames-penney.gif
infeeeee (2025-02-28 00:26:11+00:00): Szia! Üdv az OpenStreetMapen!

Az összes infó amit felvettél már szerepelt az objektumon, ezért ezt a szerkesztésed visszavonom.

Ha kérdésed merülne fel, a magyar szerkesztő közösség elérhetőségeit megtalálod ezen az oldalon: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hungary/Közösség

További jó térképezést!
infeeeee (2025-02-28 00:26:54+00:00): Visszavonva:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163032809
pitscheplatsch (2025-03-13 13:15:31+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/163570194
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-06 03:24:16+00:00): Cleaned up SEO spam tags for Two Men and a Truck POI in changeset 183720989

https://osm.org/changeset/183720989