piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-06 11:01:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134571999 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed mechanica edits, including those referred to at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7024 and some others.  See also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/currently-ongoing-automated-edit-for-service-vehicle/97737 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-06 10:59:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134571999 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed mechanica edits, including those referred to at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7024 and some others.  See also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/currently-ongoing-automated-edit-for-service-vehicle/97737 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-06 11:00:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134571999 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed mechanica edits, including those referred to at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7024 and some others.  See also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/currently-ongoing-automated-edit-for-service-vehicle/97737 .
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-03-29 04:36:45+00:00): what is the need for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1158017827 to have 239 nodes
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-06 11:00:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134571999 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed mechanica edits, including those referred to at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7024 and some others.  See also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/currently-ongoing-automated-edit-for-service-vehicle/97737 .
user_5359 (2023-03-29 17:05:52+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please add a comment abou your changes. By the way the correct notation is building instead of buiilding.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-06 10:59:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134571999 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed mechanica edits, including those referred to at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7024 and some others.  See also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/currently-ongoing-automated-edit-for-service-vehicle/97737 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-06 11:02:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134571999 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed mechanica edits, including those referred to at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7024 and some others.  See also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/currently-ongoing-automated-edit-for-service-vehicle/97737 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-06 11:01:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134571999 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed mechanica edits, including those referred to at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7024 and some others.  See also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/currently-ongoing-automated-edit-for-service-vehicle/97737 .
eggie (2023-03-29 05:30:13+00:00): Dag sv  footway heb ik omgezet naar path.
Dan krijg je ook geen foutmelding maxspeed 15 op een wandelpad...  
Waneer je er mag fietsen zal path beter kloppen.
MVG
eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-06 11:02:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134571999 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed mechanica edits, including those referred to at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7024 and some others.  See also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/currently-ongoing-automated-edit-for-service-vehicle/97737 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-06 10:59:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134571999 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed mechanica edits, including those referred to at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7024 and some others.  See also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/currently-ongoing-automated-edit-for-service-vehicle/97737 .
map per (2023-03-29 07:29:29+00:00): Hello Lea4444,

And welcome to OpenStreetMaps!

As requeted, I reviewed your changeset:

Please try to keep the edits within one changeset local (1). Therefore please safe the changes in one country before you move on to the next country. If you spread your changes over a bigger area like in this changeset (see (2)) its not possible to review and check your changes with standard analyzing software any more.

Thanks and best regards
map per

(1) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
(2) https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/134235788
trial (2023-03-28 20:52:39+00:00): as said: warnings:mismatched_geometry:unclosed_multipolygon_part
the polygon is just a line (missing the North-East part).
SomeoneElse (2023-03-28 22:40:04+00:00): Hello,
This was essentially your first edit to OpenStreetMap; generally speaking trying to change international borders is not a good first change in OpenStreetMap.
We've had to undo your changes as they have broken the relations here.
If you have any questions, please email data@openstreetmap.org with a subject of "Re: [Ticket#2023032110000134] Western Sahara"

Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2023-03-28 22:40:32+00:00): مرحبًا،
كان هذا في الأساس أول تعديل لك على OpenStreetMap ؛ بشكل عام ، فإن محاولة تغيير الحدود الدولية ليست تغييرًا جيدًا أولًا في OpenStreetMap.
لقد اضطررنا إلى التراجع عن تغييراتك لأنها قطعت العلاقات هنا.
إذا كان لديك أي أسئلة ، يرجى إرسال بريد إلكتروني إلى data@openstreetmap.org مع موضوع "Re: [تذكرة رقم 2023032110000134] الصحراء الغربية"

أطيب التحيات،
آندي
SomeoneElse (2023-03-28 22:40:50+00:00): Bonjour,
Il s'agissait essentiellement de votre première modification d'OpenStreetMap ; d'une manière générale, essayer de changer les frontières internationales n'est pas un bon premier changement dans OpenStreetMap.
Nous avons dû annuler vos modifications car elles ont rompu les relations ici.
Si vous avez des questions, veuillez envoyer un e-mail à data@openstreetmap.org avec comme sujet "Re : [Ticket #2023032110000134] Sahara occidental"

Cordialement,
Andy
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-29 03:04:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 134238792, 134242163 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some political edits by a new user in Western Sahara that broke boundary polygons
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-06 10:59:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134571999 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed mechanica edits, including those referred to at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7024 and some others.  See also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/currently-ongoing-automated-edit-for-service-vehicle/97737 .
emersonveenstra (2023-03-30 10:40:48+00:00): Hi,

Looks like you missed the `highway=construction` tag here, would you mind fixing it? Thanks! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1158023164
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-29 03:04:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 134238792, 134242163 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some political edits by a new user in Western Sahara that broke boundary polygons
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-29 03:05:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 134238792, 134242163 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some political edits by a new user in Western Sahara that broke boundary polygons
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-29 03:04:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 134238792, 134242163 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some political edits by a new user in Western Sahara that broke boundary polygons
Langlaeufer (2023-05-06 08:55:58+00:00): Hallo Klaus.
deine Bearbeitung hat ein Widerspruch verursacht. Wenn man separate Wege entfernt, müssen auch die use_sidepath weg. siehe:  https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/widerspruchlich-getaggte-rad-und-fusswege/98297/14
MonsterKlaus (2023-05-08 19:24:26+00:00): Hallo Langläufer, 
da habe ich wohl nicht aufgepasst und das use_sidepath stehen lassen. Es war mir aber auch nicht bewußt, das dass einen Widerspruch erzeugt. Habe die Diskussion gelesen und so lerne ich immer dazu. Chris66 hat den Fehler ja schon korrigiert. Danke für den Hinweis und Grüße von
Klaus
Langlaeufer (2023-05-08 19:49:50+00:00): Dazulernen können wir alle immer wieder. Genau deshalb hab ich es angemerkt. Weiterhin frohes mappen.
SomeoneElse (2023-03-28 21:27:39+00:00): Hello,
Can you explain what you are trying to do?
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2023-03-28 21:28:59+00:00): Bonjour,
Pouvez-vous expliquer ce que vous essayez de faire ?
Cordialement,
Andy
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-29 03:04:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 134238792, 134242163 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some political edits by a new user in Western Sahara that broke boundary polygons
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-29 03:05:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 134238792, 134242163 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some political edits by a new user in Western Sahara that broke boundary polygons
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-28 21:02:29+00:00): Can you take a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4717876 ?
Cebderby (2025-05-28 22:23:17+00:00): It's a marginal case.  Compared to how it was, it was made dual and feels like it.  The river bridge has old and new halves with a physical division, and the W arm of the T junction has a more-than-minimal island and about a 13m spacing between E and W bound.  So this section is divided.  Beyond that, it's a question of where these 2 ways meet - functionally it's good as it is and OS OpenMap Local agrees.  For OSM, the join points back to a single way could be shorter if people want.
user_3022894 (2023-04-04 17:44:48+00:00): Hi Olaf,

unter anderem zu: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/105065382/history :

Wenn ein Weg bereits mit access=no gekennzeichnet ist, braucst du motorcar=no nicht zusätzlich zu taggen, da dies durch access=no impliziert wird.

Ich halte access=no allerdings für etwas kritisch an den Friedhofs-Hauptwegen.

access=no (+ foot=yes) heißt: "Es hat absolut niemand Zugang, außer Fußgänger".
Die Gärtnerei bzw. die Bewirtschafter des Friedhofs dürfen da doch aber sicherlich auch mit (Kraft-)fahrzeugen herfahren, oder? Breit genug sind die Wege ja.

Wenn da wirklich ausnahmslos keine Fahrzeuge erlaubt wären, würde es keinen Sinn machen, sie als highway=service zu klassifizieren. Dann wären das einfach nur sehr recht Fußwege...

Viele Grüße

Lukas aka Elefant

(damit du mich "wiedererkennst": mein ehemaliger Username war Lukas458)
wuppertal-freund (2023-04-12 20:08:37+00:00): wen du eine gute (eindeutige) Quelle zum taggen von Friedhofswegen findest, lass es mich wissen. Im Südwesten des Friedhofs (und auch nur dort) sind alle kleinsten Trittwege eingebracht, man erkennt die (asphaltierten) Hauptwege kaum. Mit meiner gesperrten Strasse ist das auch nicht optimal.
Also wäre access=private vielleicht besser, damit Berechtigte fahren dürfen
Grüße,
Olaf
user_3022894 (2023-04-13 17:44:47+00:00): Hi,

ich denke, access=private wäre eine Idee. Man könnte ggf. auch über vehicle=private nachdenken (eines von beiden).

Hielte ich auf jeden Fall beides für gut / besser als access=no.

Viele Grüße
Lukas
user_3022894 (2023-04-13 18:28:01+00:00): motorcar=no würde ich dann vorschlagen, ganz zu entfernen (abgedeckt entweder von vehicle=private oder access=private).
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-29 03:04:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 134238792, 134242163 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some political edits by a new user in Western Sahara that broke boundary polygons
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-29 03:05:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 134238792, 134242163 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some political edits by a new user in Western Sahara that broke boundary polygons
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-03-29 03:53:08+00:00): 134237538 134193131 134192923 134192699 134157880 have been reverted for not following import guidelines. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-03-29 03:53:24+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/134243280
gagan maan (2023-04-02 07:17:16+00:00): Maan farm house
user_12531033 (2023-03-29 08:56:06+00:00): 您好，可以把很多个地铁口的变更放在一个变更集中。
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134237583
PT-53 (2023-03-29 08:30:46+00:00): Hallo Nachtspazz,
Willkommen zurück bei OSM.

Bei diesem Gebäude
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/934259480/history
hast Du versehentlich diesen Knoten
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8658904905/history
um rd. 40m nach Süden verschoben.
Korregiert Du das wieder?
Fragende Grüße
gurglypipe (2023-03-28 22:20:01+00:00): Reworked a bit more in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/134238394. Looking at the older OS mapping (OS 25 Inch 1892-1914) and the newer OpenData StreetView, it looks a lot like Escow Beck is culverted below the two footpaths/tracks before re-emerging and going into the Lune.

It can’t be a sinkhole here because the underlying geology is not limestone.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-02 16:29:53+00:00): Hello!

You used
cuisine=arabic
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10769633270/history

Have you maybe meant
cuisine=arab
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
Robot8A (2025-05-03 22:59:59+00:00): Done, dziękuję!
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165779605
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-04 06:04:53+00:00): And thanks for both original mapping and moving toward more typical tagging!

(in case where weird tags bring no benefits, sometimes you need weird tags)
literan (2023-04-13 10:13:20+00:00): ну какой это санаторий?
ЖК, я там жил. Откат.
anastasia_ (2023-04-17 18:50:08+00:00): По документам на ввод в эксплуатацию, + это нежилой объект.
literan (2023-04-17 19:40:04+00:00): в OSM вносятся не документы, а truth on the ground

ознакомьтесь, пожалуйста, с базовыми принципами проекта: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Map_what's_on_the_ground
anastasia_ (2023-04-17 20:03:52+00:00): Все же сам застройщик говорит о том, что это - апарт-отель.
literan (2023-04-17 20:09:15+00:00): 1) где? http://mir-vnutri.ru/

2) вы замапили его как санаторий, а не как апарт-отель
anastasia_ (2023-04-18 20:39:15+00:00): Да, все верно, стоило как апарт.
Спасибо, что отметили и поправили
emersonveenstra (2023-03-30 10:29:27+00:00): Hi,

Looks like you created this multipolygon with an unclosed end: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15657641. Could you please fix it? Thanks!
TheDutchMan13 (2023-03-30 16:46:21+00:00): Fixing it now, thanks.
rskedgell (2023-03-29 06:28:35+00:00): The Victoria and Albert Museum has been mapped in OpenStreetMap since 2008.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/29795
silversurfer83 (2023-03-30 16:51:44+00:00): Hello :)
Thank you for contributing to OSM. It is much appreciated.

There's something I'd like to draw your attention to:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

You will find much more helpful information in the OSM wiki, but that's it for today.

Should you have any questions please don't hesitate to ask.

Cheers
silversurfer83
NorthCrab_upload (2023-03-28 22:40:38+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/430034248
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/430034250
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/430034256
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/430034255

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-29 03:05:03+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 134084763, 134235982, 134236160, 134236258, 134236315, 134236473, 134236542, 134236648, 134236762, 134236940, 134237095, 134237245, 134237395, 134237494, 134237856, 134238053, 134238256, 134238459.
AbbyHatcherTheVideoEditor2K10 (2023-04-01 20:34:41+00:00): Nice
AbbyHatcherTheVideoEditor3903HD (2023-06-29 14:14:39+00:00): Cool
silversurfer83 (2023-04-18 21:21:28+00:00): Howdy
you asked for someone to Review your changeset.
I'll try and help:
you left the fixme, added motor_vehicle=yes and changed the higway from footway to path all without giving a source of your information.
Can you explain, why you changed those tags? After that, we can find out if your change was a good one.

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134239065
xxxxxxxxxxxxxa (2023-04-19 00:01:02+00:00): it had evidence in the fix me saying "Please review. Is this bridge truly closed to motor vehicles? If so, how does Hospital Yaviza receive supplies?" so i changed it
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134239065
silversurfer83 (2023-04-19 05:21:57+00:00): Oh. I see what you mean.
The "fixme" tag is a way to tell people who are familiar with the situation to please go check in person.
Did you go and check the bridge yourself? Have you been "on the ground"?

Cheers
silversurfer83 (2023-04-23 02:54:16+00:00): Hi again :)

So. Have you got any evidence apart from a suggestion in a fixme tag that supports your changes?
analtacount (2023-04-23 16:36:53+00:00): no...
silversurfer83 (2023-04-24 14:40:19+00:00): Thank you for your honesty. IMHO that means we'll have to set this back to the situation before you changed it.

Things like these need to be checked on the ground. Either in person or using images (but NOT google streetview. We are not allowed to use google services) like bing streetside, kartaview or mapilary. Or we know someone in the area who can provide images.

Maybe this wiki article can clear things up a bit :)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice
highflyer74 (2023-03-29 05:27:49+00:00): Moin und willkommen bei OSM!

Damit der Eintrag auch genutzt werden kann, bedarf es einer bestimmten Formatierung, mit der OSM arbeitet. Ich habe diese jetzt angepasst: 

- https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10769729478

Nur um sicherzugehen: es handelt sich um ein Geschäft, welches für Kunden besuchbar ist und kein reines Büro?

Viele Grüße aus Oberneuland!
highflyer74 (2023-04-06 06:03:31+00:00): Moin! Da bisher keine Rückmeldung erfolgte, lasse ich den Eintrag als Geschäft stehen.
pippo6 (2025-04-27 19:28:07+00:00): Ciao, non sono un esperto, ma layer=0 su https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/190628766 dà errore in Osmose perché credo che è come dire che c'è un incrocio
Miraç Ömer (2023-04-08 22:48:47+00:00): Ama bu iki yönlü yol
Ahmad-0772 (2023-04-09 00:49:45+00:00): Merhaba Miraç Ömer
Hayır, yol iki yönlü bir yol değil, Uydu ve yol işaretlerine göre tek yönlüdür.

Hello Miraç Ömer 
No the road isn’t a two-way road it is a one-way based on Satellite and road signs.
Miraç Ömer (2023-04-10 22:27:44+00:00): What is your source?
Ahmad-0772 (2023-04-10 23:42:40+00:00): Satellite image.

However you can check this street image https://maps.app.goo.gl/rXEjnJr18LzJXCKY7?g_st=ic
LockOnGuy (2023-06-12 12:25:19+00:00): Hello Ahmad-0772, Are you relying to google maps as a source for your edits?    
Regards.
PCarew_EG (2023-03-31 20:29:27+00:00): Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap!
It looks like the building=yes tag was added to an administrative boundary in this edit. An administrative boundary is recognized by governments and is purely an outline. Buildings within the boundary should be tagged individually by tracing the building footprint from aerial imagery. To tag areas of land use within an administrative boundary you can refer to the extensive information available in the OSM wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Land_use

For now, I have removed the building-yes tag from this boundary feature. If you are unsure or have any questions don't hesitate to reach out, ask for help on the OSM community forums or refer to the wiki. https://community.openstreetmap.org/

Happy Mapping!
BigKev97 (2023-04-07 23:41:42+00:00): Now it says "Area", not an "Administrative Boundary". ¿Why?
PCarew_EG (2023-04-10 14:01:01+00:00): @BigKev97 Good catch, when the area was changed to a building it also changed the type to a multipolygon, I just changed the type to boundary and set the boundary to administrative.
AbbyHatcherTheVideoEditor2K10 (2023-04-01 19:51:34+00:00): Nice
wireguy (2023-03-29 13:12:00+00:00): Swaldon, Great work filling in the New Hope area!
wireguy (2023-03-29 12:55:00+00:00): hi Ornella, welcome to osm!  Great job finding and mapping pools in the area, but the outlines are the size of the houses.  Try and be as accurate as possible.   With rectangular objects pressing Q key when selected will square the corners.   Keep mapping!  If you have q's just ask.  hms_gw?
emersonveenstra (2023-03-29 10:37:23+00:00): Hi,

You have duplicated values in the direction tag on all of these nodes, is that on purpose?
DonutsAreImportant (2023-03-29 16:19:09+00:00): Yes, since each mast has 4 lights (2 on angles and 2 pointed straight ahead). 

Should I change this?
emersonveenstra (2023-03-29 18:01:35+00:00): There isn't a clear right or wrong answer, but to me duplicating values seems weird because imo the direction tag should specify the direction(s) where the light from the mast shines, not where each individual light shines, since we're mapping the mast, not the lights. But the wiki page doesn't even mention direction, so I'm fine if you leave it, i just wanted to make sure it wasn't a mistake you made
emersonveenstra (2023-03-29 10:21:58+00:00): Hi,

You deleted the golf course here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/294028777 and then re-added it here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1158062168#map=16/42.6699/-82.8722

Please do not do that, instead you need to resize the already existing golf course. You have now removed information from the map, which is frowned upon. Please re-add the phone number, website, and fix the street name of the golf course you added. You can find the former values here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/294028777/history
kucai (2023-04-08 10:52:00+00:00): Kenapa Jalan Bukit Kemuning terpisah kepada dua? Dahulu dah dipisah, kemudian dibetulkan kepada 2-way street, lepas tu dipisahkan balik? 

Kita nak pisahkan jalan double line ke?
GrabMY_FaizDjamil (2023-04-10 01:55:39+00:00): ye tuan, sebab saya rasa lebih kemas. Lagipun jalan yang 2-way tu pendek dan double-line. Saya rasa lebih kemas asingkan dari tambah banyak2 turn restriction.
GrabMY_FaizDjamil (2023-04-10 01:56:08+00:00): kalau bercanggah dengan local wiki mohon maaf saya revert balik edit saya nanti
kucai (2023-04-10 04:45:41+00:00): Lebih kemas ke, atau nak ikut google? ;) 
Pernah jumpa berkilometer jalan double line yang terpisah camtu, nak kata kemas pun idak juga. Penin ada la. Yang selalu nak separate ni adalah disebabkan nak mudah buat bus route tapi ada JOSM senang aja. 

Pernah terfikir jugak nak buat, tapi bercanggah dengan prinsip physical separation yang sebenarnya ada juga kepentingannya. So, turn restriction pun turn restriction la, nak buat camna. Inipun kacang je nak buat dalam JOSM.  

Rasanya satu tempat je yang sesuai nak buat separation camtu iaitu susur keluar/masuk yang ada area triangle cat belang2, sebabnya ialah selalunya tak berkait sangat dengan jalan2 lain. (dalam hati terdetik juga nak delete heh)
GrabMY_FaizDjamil (2023-04-10 05:03:18+00:00): ok baik saya dah revert balik. terima kasih tegur bang
mueschel (2023-03-29 16:51:41+00:00): Hi,
please check these parking tags. There shouldn't be a 'side' in the tag. This needs to be 'left','right' or 'both'.