piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Benoit84 (2024-10-27 13:10:28+00:00): J'ai regardé le lien et en effet, le tracé passe plus près du trou des américains que celui que j'ai modifié. Mais ce petit sentier qui permet de rejoindre le trou des américains depuis le nord ouest n'est quasiment plus praticable, la végétation a beaucoup poussé et il faut se faufiler à travers les arbustes pour passer. J'ai d'ailleurs indiqué que la visibilité du sentier était "horrible" en anglais, c'est ce que j'ai trouvé de mieux pour l'indiquer. Cela ne me semble pas acceptable d'y faire passer un itinéraire balisé.
Il se trouve aussi que le  panneau jaune indiquant les différentes itinéraires comme Clastre - Trou des Américains (16356768) et que la relation que j'avais cassée englobe était mal positionné sur la carte. Il ne se situe pas au trou des américains mais à l'intersection à quelques dizaines de mètres au nord est.
C'était la raison de mon changement dans lequel j'ai malencontreusement oublié une relation (j'en avais corrigé 2 mais je n'avais pas vu qu'il y en avait une 3ème).

Je précise que, dans le lien que vous m'avez fourni, on peut voir qu'il y a aussi plus loin une divergence sur la relation La Glaurivette - Les Bruyères (16355933), à proximité du panneau les Bruyères. Je m'y suis rendu la semaine dernière parce que je ne connaissais pas le chemin qu'emprunte cet itinéraire et le chemin en question n'existe pas du tout, et même il y a 10 ou 20 ans je ne me souviens pas qu'il y ait eu une trace ici. Et je ne vois pas trop comment il aurait pu exister parce que c'est très pentu (quasiment vertical). En cherchant j'en ai trouvé un qui est un peu tracé un peu à l'ouest, mais il est très pentu, pas très visible et trop pentu de mon point de vue pour y faire passer un itinéraire balisé. J'ai donc modifié le tracé pour le faire suivre l'itinéraire indiqué par le panneau jaune, qui lui est un sentier bien marqué et emprunté, même si il a récemment été pas mal dégradé par l'érosion.

Concernant les poteaux indiquant les itinéraires de randonnée, j'essaie de les noter quand j'en vois et je profite de chacune de mes sorties VTT pour affiner les tracés ou en rajouter des manquants. Mais je ne sais pas où on peut trouver une source de données qui les référence tous, désolé.
Benoit84 (2025-02-03 09:26:57+00:00): Bonjour StC. J'ai rajouté une photo du panneau dénommé trou des Américains (ici https://api.panoramax.xyz/#focus=pic&map=17/43.91895/5.422783&pic=7f01e28b-8308-45db-8548-4c84b78c675d&speed=250&xyz=0.00/0.00/30).
On peut y voir que les itinéraires vers Saint Philibert et Clastres empruntent bien des chemins différents (et le panneau est bien positionné sur la carte).

L'itinéraire vers Clastres part donc bien directement vers l'ouest et pas vers le sud pour passer près du trou des Américains et rejoindre le chemin qui part vers l'ouest (cette portion n'étant presque plus praticable tellement la végétation a poussé).

OSM me semble donc être correct à cet endroit.

Bonne journée !
neuhausr (2024-10-25 16:12:27+00:00): Hi, was wondering if you can avoid gluing the former railway lines to actual features? I've seen examples where you share these nodes with buildings, landuses, roads, etc. which just creates more work for anyone who's editing actual features later. Also, from imagery I'm not sure if all of these are best tagged "abandoned" -- it appears "razed" would be better at least for some. The wiki says abandoned should be "where the rails have been removed but the route is still visible with ties/sleepers, signals or other railroad right of way signs or infrastructure".
RedSkies (2024-10-25 16:22:25+00:00): I do apologize, I am trying to avoid attaching any rail to current infrastructure. 

Thanks for letting me know. 

RedSkies
Black_Diamond (2024-10-24 23:37:51+00:00): Thank you 😃
marialoyko (2024-10-29 08:52:00+00:00): Thank you too, have a great day!
eggie (2024-10-24 19:48:08+00:00): De info van bakker en kapsalon heb ik samengevoegd met de adresnodes.
Groet
eggie
CurlingMan13 (2024-10-24 15:57:33+00:00): Good edit
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158301250
dval (2024-10-25 16:14:36+00:00): До Веселовки и в самой ней surface не асфальт. Асфальт кончается в Карпинске где-то сразу за поворотом на новое кладбище.
Syl (2024-10-24 15:31:30+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai modifié la restriction d'accès de la route, ce n'était pas une valeur valide.
Et pour le poteau j'ai un doute sur le fait que ce soit toujours EDF qui s'en occupe, de nos jours c'est plutôt Enedis.
HugoC01 (2024-10-25 08:22:55+00:00): Pour le poteau, il y a une plaque EDF donc c'est pour ça que j'ai mis EDF, mais vu que le poteau est vieux il est possible que ça soit Enedis qui s'en occupe actuellement mais que la plaque n'a pas été changé.
rskedgell (2024-10-26 17:24:07+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I am not sure why you deleted the traffic signal node before the pedestrian crossing on Pall Mall East, but I have reverted your edit in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158385883

What were you trying to do?
rskedgell (2024-10-26 17:33:32+00:00): Vandalism reverted.
LockOnGuy (2024-10-24 18:17:02+00:00): Why did you delete the Arabic name entirely?
zhiar590 (2024-10-24 18:24:48+00:00): because the name was incorrect people here call it sara roundabout and i don't know what sara means in arabic
zhiar590 (2024-10-24 18:27:14+00:00): sorry i thought it was my changeset i did many changes i apologize wait for the person himself to reply
Rasti1298 (2024-10-24 18:42:33+00:00): hi LockOnGuy
I did the edit when i was in a hurry I'm sorry i will add the Arabic name now i deleted the Arabic because it wasn't correct i will add the arabic name now
Rasti1298 (2024-10-24 18:43:41+00:00): hi zhiar590 
no worries, but please don't let it happen again
CurlingMan13 (2024-10-24 15:55:39+00:00): Temporary closures are generally not mapped, because more often than not, people forget to remove their tags, leaving the roads to show closed for many years (in error).

Additionally, it takes a few months for navigation software to reflect updates from OSM, so it may not even get integrated until long after it is completed.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158302211
une abeille (2024-10-24 18:43:20+00:00): Hello, and thank you for your contribution!

If you will be mapping sidewalks in the Montréal area, could you please read my guide here? https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/une%20abeille/diary/402005
These guidelines will ensure that the data we add will be the most useful as possible for people with mobility limitations. You can also examine the sidewalks in areas Rosemont, where all of the sidewalks have been drawn to this standard.

Please also make sure you're using the correct offset for Bing imaergy. For Montréal, this is 0.6,-1.54
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Montr%C3%A9al
Ariel Anisman (2024-10-24 19:54:01+00:00): Hi! These are my changes that you reverted. I added them in for an assignment in school where we need to contribute accessibility data in a particular area of Montreal. I have verified that this information is accurate on the ground as I live in this area and walked and took photos last weekend on Sunday, Oct 20, 2024. I am sure this information is accurate.

Why did you revert my changes?
une abeille (2024-10-24 19:56:34+00:00): Please see the comment I left here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158140058
Ariel Anisman (2024-10-24 20:08:33+00:00): I've gone through your guidelines and I mostly followed them (e.g., draw in the middle of the physical sidewalk as it appears on satellite imagery, indicate the surface type, ensure that crossings are connected, etc.). But I have also followed the specific instructions that my professor provided to me when tagging. So, I do not understand why you reverted my changes - if anything, I made them more accurate according to your guidelines.

I would appreciate you do not revert my changes unless you are an admin and have a valid reason for reverting them. This is for an assignment that I am getting graded on.
une abeille (2024-10-24 20:15:40+00:00): They were absolutely not drawn in the middle of the physical sidewalk, because you were not using the correct imagery offset as described in my comment to you. You also drew the curb nodes directly on the sidewalks, as I talk about in my guide as being something that we are trying to avoid in Montréal. There were also issues with the tagging. If you'd like to contribute sidewalk data again, please make sure to use the correct offset, and take a look at the mapped sidewalks in Rosemont for a template that you can examine the tagging on.

Please tell your professor that the OSM community would appreciate it if they would provide better training for their students before having them edit OSM. (Discussion here: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/current-influx-of-students-mapping-poorly-in-montreal/120635)

There are ways to allow students to work on an OSM sandbox that doesn't make actual edits to the data. This would be a better option for your professor, if they do not wish to carefully validate edits. I have already spent several hours of my personal time fixing errors, and would prefer to avoid spending more time doing so.
Vaidotas (2024-12-14 11:16:24+00:00): How did you come to conclusion that only right turn is allowed when driving out of those three driveways? There are no road signs implying turn restrictions, and street markings have dashed lines here.
Krkkc (2024-11-01 21:20:16+00:00): Mam pytanie w jakim celu zostały dodane do nazw przystanków nr. stanowiska? Skoro na warstwie transportu publicznego jest ta informacja.
bzzzkrk (2024-11-02 22:41:35+00:00): Pomysł nie jest mój. Zobaczyłem, że ktoś dodał numery na Nowym Kleparzu i Dworcu Wschód zapisywane "stanowisko X" i uznałem, że nie zaszkodzi tych numerów dodać na innych pętlach, żeby były też w ogólnym widoku, tylko już z zapisem skróconym "st. X" czyli takim jakim posługuje się ZTP
Krkkc (2024-11-03 12:53:36+00:00): Tylko czy to ma sens skoro numery stanowiska są na warstwie transportu publicznego. Bo jest to powielanie informacji co nie ma jak dla mnie zbytnio sensu.
bzzzkrk (2024-11-10 22:01:14+00:00): Ja przyznaje, że jakiś super biegły nie jestem, więc może się mylę, ale wydaje mi się, że na warstwie transportu publicznego są pokazywane te same nazwy co na warstwie podstawowej, więc numery stanowisk albo są w obydwu miejscach, albo w żadnym. A nawet jeśli da się to jakoś rozłączyć to osobiście nie widzę problemu w tym, że coś jest powielone jeśli nie utrudnia to odbioru całości, a taki numer raczej niczego nie utrudnia
Maciej9 (2025-01-26 20:58:57+00:00): Numery stanowisk powinny być przeniesione do local_ref, bo numer stanowiska nie stanowi części nazwy
CurlingMan13 (2024-10-24 17:24:30+00:00): Reviewed.  Good edit.  Not sure why the capacity was ever "0"
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158303441
CurlingMan13 (2024-10-24 17:25:06+00:00): Reviewed as requested - good edit.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158303591
dcapillae (2024-10-24 17:33:37+00:00): Buenas tardes.

Gracias por los cambios.

Recuerde no usar todo mayúsculas en los nombres. Se prefiere usar solo en la primera letra de las palabras principales (title case): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Uppercase_characters

Los estancos no suelen tener nombre. A no ser que exista explícitamente, no use «name=*». Puede usar la etiqueta «ref=*» para indicar el número de expendeduría del estanco: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Objetos_que_generan_dudas_en_Espa%C3%B1a#Estanco

Gracias de nuevo por su colaboración.

Atentamente,
Daniel Capilla
CurlingMan13 (2024-10-24 17:23:37+00:00): You requested a review.  Good edit.

FYI - you can do more than 1 house in each changeset.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158304192
AhmadHB (2024-10-24 16:32:17+00:00):  بزرگراه کنارک - ایرانشهر
CurlingMan13 (2024-10-24 17:23:19+00:00): You requested a review.  Good edit.

FYI - you can do more than 1 house in each changeset.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158304400
MxxCon (2024-10-30 20:49:06+00:00): Hello.
You should not have renamed 5889475671. "Banana Republic Factory" is a different store from "Banana Republic".
CurlingMan13 (2024-10-24 17:22:50+00:00): You requested a review.  Good edit.

FYI - you can do more than 1 house in each changeset.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158304445
CurlingMan13 (2024-10-24 17:22:16+00:00): You requested a review.  Good edit.

FYI - you can do more than 1 house in each changeset.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158304557
Rodrigo Rega (2024-10-25 23:57:18+00:00): Hola,

No es necesario borrar completamente los comercios cerrados. Existen formas de indicarlo, de este modo se mantiene el historial. Para saber cómo hacerlo puedes echar un ojo a https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Prefijo_de_ciclo_vital

Pocederé a revertir este cambio y aplicar etiquetado con prefijo disused.

Gracias por tus aportes a OSM. Un saludo.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158304567
Rodrigo Rega (2024-10-25 23:58:40+00:00): Revertido

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158358442
Andrew Chadwick (2024-10-24 18:59:21+00:00): Is it designated for cycles and foot? Can't remember the signage. I'll have a close look next time I'm down there.

(obviously it's infinitely preferable by bike to all those cobbles…)
gmar5 (2024-10-24 19:18:57+00:00): No signs, I think.
CurlingMan13 (2024-10-24 17:21:37+00:00): Reviewed.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158304709
LordGarySugar (2025-04-11 02:50:07+00:00): I've broken it up into ~15 smaller (normal) polygons :)
FroschForscher (2024-10-28 08:45:13+00:00): Hallo Gerhard24, nachdem die Kreuzung Münchener Straße soweit wieder funktioniert, hier noch die Empfehlung für die nächsten Wiki Artikel: Rad- und Gehwege.

Guter Einstieg:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dpath

Betrifft Wege mit VZ 240 wie
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25577564
Gerhard24 (2024-10-28 11:26:24+00:00): Hallo, danke für den Tipp. Ich werde mir das anschauen.
Andrew Chadwick (2024-10-24 18:52:02+00:00): I don't so much care about the legal designation, I care more about what's on the ground (signs included, of course, but reality for preference every time)

What to do with it? I'd argue there's far too much daytime bus traffic for it not to be thought of as *some* kind of oneway bus channel in the middle of a pedestrian zone. The central bus bit has a different surface treatment as well, which is why I bothered with the sidewalks: those become de facto channels for pedestrians as well, or at least favourable routes.

One thing we ought to look closely at: I think the Eastern that's basically Carfax and the taxi rank is psv=yes, or at least taxi=yes (and bidirectional)
gmar5 (2024-10-24 19:16:56+00:00): Pedestrians are everywhere. Buses drive slowly and wait for pedestrians to move away. As far as I understand, pedestrians have precedence, legally given by the signage of the pedestrian area.
De facto, I think it behaves as a living street: different surface from the regular roads, no pavement-road distinctions, all users (pedestrians and buses) share the space with common sense. Living streets, however, seem to imply a legal designation of "home zone" and related blue signage.
A designated road for pedestrian should not be anything else, in my opinion. I strongly feel this should not be a regular road. 

As for the last bit at Carfax, you are right. The signage starts at the very beginning, so there is no space for the taxis in Queen St itself (except when they are allowed at night of course, when mostly they wait there, but I don't think there is an official bay). I will check the connecting segment named Carfax, which they can use for turning during the day.
birdlawyer (2024-10-30 21:41:02+00:00): Hello, and thanks for your interest in OSM. It appears that the features you're mapping do not exist in reality and so I've reverted this changeset in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158556171. Please refrain from mapping features that do not exist on the ground. You can learn more about making accurate and appropriate contributions to OpenStreetMap at https://learnosm.org/. However, if you're more interested in creative mapping, I'd recommend checking out https://www.opengeofiction.net. Happy mapping!
eggie (2024-10-24 19:39:36+00:00): Dag Oscar,

Volgens mij klopt het zo.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-10-24 19:41:15+00:00): aanvulling.. oneway=no hoef je niet te taggen op reguliere wegen.
Dat doe je alleen als je bang bent dat een medemapper oneway=yes gaat taggen. Bv op een tweerichting fietsrotonde.
eggie (2024-10-24 19:45:43+00:00): Even 'mierenneuken'.  sidewalk=both klopt dan weer niet op de dubbele rijbanen.
Het ene trottoir kun je beter opnemen in de tagging van het fietspad richting zuid met sidewalk=left en het andere trottoir zou je apart kunnen intekenen, want er ligt een groenstrook tussen hoofdrijbaan en trottoir.
Maar een validator heeft altijd wat te zeuren. :)

Mapse
eggie
OvdLeur (2024-10-24 20:33:51+00:00): Dank voor de review en het mierenneuken; dat soort details zijn heel leerzaam!
Ga ik mee aan de slag.

MVG
Oscar
ZipperZbieracz (2024-10-25 11:39:26+00:00): błąd ortograficzny w "poprawionej" nazwie, niekonsekwentny skrót "N.M.Panny"... po co?
Marek-M (2024-10-25 11:51:21+00:00): Nazwy obiektów sakralnych rozszerzamy zgodnie z ustaleniami społeczności Openstreetmap - kilka lat temu była na ten temat dyskusja i taki zostało to ustalone.

Ponadto spójrz na przykłady na wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dplace_of_worship#Nazewnictwo_obiektów_sakralnych


Jeżeli widzisz błąd, to go po prostu popraw. Nie robi błędów ten, kto nic nie robi. Korekta mojego błędu jest w Changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158333704
ZipperZbieracz (2024-10-25 11:55:01+00:00): ok, dobrze wiedzieć
ZipperZbieracz (2024-10-25 11:38:13+00:00): Po co rozwijać "św." do "Świętego"? Nie dość, że świętego pisze się z małej litery, więc to nie jest poprawa nazwy lecz jej zepsucie (święty to nie jest nazwa własna), to "świętego" zawsze się skraca do "św.", nawet same organizacje religijne tak robią przy podawaniu nazw swoich kościołów. Po za tym na mapie
Marek-M (2024-10-25 11:47:40+00:00): `św.` rozwijamy do `Świętego` zgodnie z ustaleniami społeczności Openstreetmap - kilka lat temu była na ten temat dyskusja i taki zostało to ustalone.

Ponadto spójrz na przykłady na wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dplace_of_worship#Nazewnictwo_obiektów_sakralnych
Dawid2849 (2024-10-25 17:42:58+00:00): Skrót św. musimy rozwijać, bo może oznaczać zarówno "Świętego", jak i "Świętą"
Nationalpark Sächsische Schweiz (2024-10-25 05:26:15+00:00): Hi! Your note says that you believe this path is accessible from the German side; it is not. The legally accessible path goes east at the crossing with "Hickelschlüchte", the part between there and the czech border is not a legally permitted way. The entire "Großer Zschand" is within the Kernzone up to "Zeughaus". In the Kernzone, only marked paths are allowed to be used, the part of the path changed here does not have a trail mark and is therefore not accessible.
Hedaja (2024-10-25 06:05:26+00:00): Hello supup

As already mentioned that way is actually really deep in the Kernzone (special protected area).
You can see it's border here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1595533
supsup (2024-10-25 07:48:40+00:00): I see, I would have reverted it then but you have done it already. Sorry.

Since there seems to be a representative of the German national park, please not the sign indicating the kern zone coming from inside Czechia is badly placed: it does not face the border, but is sideways, leaving impressin kernzone is only to the west of this road.
supsup (2024-10-25 07:49:05+00:00): that should have been "please note"
Nationalpark Sächsische Schweiz (2024-10-25 08:07:47+00:00): No problem! I initially wanted to wait for you to revert it yourself, but this is unfortunately a very sensitive area and I wanted to be better safe than sorry. No hard feelings towards you at all! 
I will forward the problem with the sign to my colleague, thank you for bringing it to our attention. It's important that these signs are unambiguous, which clearly this one is not.
Marek-M (2024-10-24 18:00:17+00:00): Jeżeli jest tam dojazd tylko dla mieszkańców a raczej tylko do ich posesji, to prawidłowy tag będzie `access=destination` i duplikowanie tej wartości dla `foot`, `bicycle` itp jest zbędne.
mcliquid (2024-11-06 13:41:40+00:00): Is this not already considered an import to that extent or has it already been discussed and just not linked?
Rodrigo Rega (2024-10-24 23:04:40+00:00): Hola.

¿Cuál es la razón para el borrado de todos estos elementos?

Por otro lado: el comentario de este conjunto de cambios no es lo suficientemente descriptivo para que el resto de usuarios se hagan una idea de cuáles han sido los elementos que se han editado. Por favor, consulta la siguiente página para saber como hacer comentarios que faciliten el trabajo de revisión de ediciones: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenos_comentarios_en_conjuntos_de_cambios

Gracias por tus aportes a OpenStreetMap.

Un saludo.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158307948
aTarom (2024-10-25 16:22:21+00:00): Hola, si us plau és important que contestis aquest changeset, l'esborrat, sobretot del cementiri,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/214475922/history
és molt fàcil interpretar-ho com a vandalisme, qualsevol dubte que tinguis amb els primers passos consulta-la amb el grup i estarem encantats d'ajudar-te i entre tots seguir millorant el mapa
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/lang-ca/69
Salutacions
eggie (2024-10-24 19:14:54+00:00): Dag Boink   Denk dat hier toch iets onbedoeld verschoven is.
Je edits
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=158308039

MVG
eggie
NorthCrab_upload (2024-10-24 18:11:13+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"ks. Stanisława Andrukiewicza":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3109511030

"Plac Brodowicza":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8231149407
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/229365620

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
PostaMap_Infinite (2024-10-24 18:05:59+00:00): I updated the building to it's current shape.
mcliquid (2024-11-06 13:41:23+00:00): Is this not already considered an import to that extent or has it already been discussed and just not linked?
Protoxenus (2025-02-02 21:36:08+00:00): Hi, an deinem Eintrag über die Seenotretter ist ziemlich viel falsch. Eine Adresse wird anders angegeben:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:addr:*
Das was du da als Name kartiert hast, ist eine Beschreibung: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Verwende_nicht_das_Name-Tag,_um_Dinge_zu_beschreiben%E2%86%99
Und das Haus, was du da von den Luftbildern abgemalt hast, wurde abgerissen.
Bitte beschäftige dich mit den Regeln, bevor du etwas mappst. Das erspart allen Arbeit.
BTW: Das Gebäude wird wieder aufgebaut, ist aber noch nicht in Benutzung.
Gruß Protoxenus
eggie (2024-10-24 19:18:00+00:00): Dag Boink.. In OSM werken we alleen met officiële straatnamen.
Dus name=Hondenuitlaatstrook kan beter als description worde getagd .
Ook kun je dog=yes of dog=leashed taggen. 
Een highway=footway heeft een G7 bord, maar daar mag je niet fietsen. 
Staat hier een G7 bord 
Klopt bicycle=yes nog wel?
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=158308220

MVG
eggie