piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2023-07-31 10:25:57+00:00): Landuse hersteld.. Even de rendering afwachten.
Groet
eggie
Jrachi (2024-11-30 15:02:00+00:00): Ciao.
Questo percorso è hiking o mtb/bicycle?
Il tag network per hiking è lwn

E, per curiosità, cosa significa noexit=yes su un percorso?
Dopo essere entrato non puoi più uscire, come il Labirinto di minosse?

Ivo
ross-map (2024-11-30 15:43:10+00:00): Ciao Ivo- ho corretto la relazione seguendo le tue osservazioni. Non so perchè era indicato come noexit, è un tag che non ho mai usato
mueschel (2023-03-26 11:56:58+00:00): Hi,
the tag "postal_code:even" is not used in other places. We typically use "postal_code:left" and "postal_code:right". Could you change the tagging on these 5 roads to this scheme?
dankarran (2023-03-27 09:23:32+00:00): I can't convert them at the moment unfortunately as I don't know which side the evens or odds are on. Once I can get some house numbers onto the buildings, then these tags (and the multiple entries on postal_code=*) will likely be stripped anyway.
dankarran (2023-03-27 13:15:47+00:00): Ok, I've managed to convert three of them by finding house numbers. No luck on the final two.
dankarran (2023-03-28 13:35:36+00:00): All fixed now
Lucarion (2023-03-18 11:44:51+00:00): Hej!

När du kartlägger solcellspaneler på tak, förlägga gärna dessa inom byggnadens fotavtryck. Kontrollera gärna med bakgrundslagret Göteborgs stadskarta. Ytorna på Mottagningsbyggnaden (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1153480235) ligger just nu utanför byggnadens fotavtryck.

Mvh,
Lucarmaps
h551w (2023-03-31 19:50:57+00:00): (whoops!)
Leo Slager (2023-03-11 22:11:24+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
OSM_RogerWilco (2023-03-13 09:37:08+00:00): Hallo Transwarp,

der Spielplatz ist bereits als Fläche erfasst: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/985688785

Löscht Du "Deinen" Spielplatz-Eintrag wieder?

Gruß Roger Wilco
gscholz (2023-03-16 07:22:39+00:00): Hi Luisa,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=36.61146&lat=-1.24212&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=133558756

As you may know, this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps.

Can you please fix this?

Btw. what about editing "real" routes instead of something that could be a bus route? May be you like to educate yourself about how to edit bus routes properly?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation#Bus_route

Kind regards
Guido
literan (2023-03-12 11:38:11+00:00): уже отмечена, вы сделали дубль
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1086495700

исправил
thermo_nuclear (2023-03-15 20:04:06+00:00): Не увидел, почему-то она не рендерится. Возможно, стоит все же назначить теги на точку
literan (2023-03-16 18:14:16+00:00): ну вот обсудите это с данным товарищем https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124939172#map=17/55.68055/37.55807&layers=N

он ходит, и везде перерисовывает площади полигонами
(inactive) WarpathPeacock (2023-04-12 12:37:32+00:00): Hello Ziggy Zobotka,

I hope this message finds you well. I would appreciate greatly if you could share more information about the gate barrier you added at coordinates 33.6965301, 73.4247142 (node 10727840141). You observed this gate in person? And if so what type of gate was it? Is it left open the majority of the time for traffic, or is there a traffic cop or any type of person attending this gate. I ask as this is a more important road and it would be excellent to add further details. I wish you the very best and hope to hear from you soon.

Best Regards,

WarpathPeacock
Ziggy Sobotka (2023-04-12 18:51:48+00:00): Hello!
thanks for raising this point! I meant to further enquire about how to best reflect the reality of this feature, but forgot.
There is a gate, guarded by soldiers/military police. It seems to be open most of the time, if not always, but the guards sometimes check vehicles. There is a sign stating that foreigners are not allowed beyond this point. And indeed, if you are identified as foreigner, you cannot pass. I don't what restrictions exist for local citizens.
Perhaps instead of marking the note as gate/barrier, it is more meaningful to make it a police checkpost?
(inactive) WarpathPeacock (2023-04-14 14:04:51+00:00): Thank you for so very much responding. I am of the opinion that you can mark this node as both a barrier and a police checkpoint, based on the reality you saw here. Adding police=checkpoint as a tag to the node is definitely the right decision, but is it also possible to be more specific about the type of gate? Checkpoints like these typically have lift_gates (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dlift_gate). Is that the case here?

In summary, I believe the tagging would be either:

barrier=gate
Police=checkpoint

or

barrier=lift_gate
police=checkpoint

I hope to hear back from you. I wish you very well this holiday season.

Best,

WarpathPeacock
(inactive) WarpathPeacock (2023-04-14 14:37:17+00:00): An additional thought I had: 

Access=permissive is probably the best access tag for this situation, meaning access is allowed until revoked by authorities, in this case police, with that in mind the best tagging would be:

barrier=gate (or a more specific value)
access=permissive
police=checkpoint
Ziggy Sobotka (2023-04-15 09:36:54+00:00): Great, thanks for the advice! I modified it as suggested.
(The reason for this access control - a nuclear military facility several kilometers south - is mapped in detail, but not marked as such. Also similar checkpoints and access restrictions on other roads leading to it aren't marked/mapped. Unfortunately, I don't have more info to change that in order to have a coherently reflected on OSM.)
(inactive) WarpathPeacock (2023-04-17 11:34:15+00:00): Hello,

It was a real pleasure to collaborate on this topic. I hope for further opportunities in the future. I appreciate very much that you added this information! I will take note that there are likely other gates preventing direct access. Just the addition of these couple tags makes a big difference in showing the context of the situation for data consumers. I wish you an excellent week. I hope you have an excellent week!

Best,

WarpathPeacock
gscholz (2023-03-19 07:11:29+00:00): Hi David,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=36.78423&lat=-1.26980&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=133559503

As you may know this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps. Can you please fix this?

As the OSMI view above clearly shows there are currently a lot of other overlapping ways which a caused by recent bus route edit activities. Can you please contact your colleges and encourage a joint effort to fix those issues? May be you can also initiate a discussion about how to avoid such errors at all? As you are all using JOSM this should not be very difficult.
Kind regards
Guido
Frans S (2023-03-11 18:41:00+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133559843
Frans S (2023-03-11 18:39:14+00:00): About highway tagging:

Please use the rules how to tag highways on this project according to this wiki.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highways

Read also the remarks about tagging of tracks in the instructions.
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133560130
MxxCon (2023-03-14 03:57:08+00:00): Hello.
Could you please confirm that this sidewalk is actually covered in asphalt and not concrete like it's usual almost everywhere else?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133560241
GerdP (2023-05-24 06:40:42+00:00): Moin!
Du hast hier eine Knotenpunktrelation erstellt, aber diese nicht zu einem Knotenpunktnetzwerk hinzugefügt. Auch die Knoten sind nicht drin. Nur vergessen?
gscholz (2023-03-16 07:25:30+00:00): Hi nicolas:D,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=36.61146&lat=-1.24212&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=133560510

As you may know, this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps.

Can you please fix this?

Btw. what about editing "real" routes instead of something that could be a bus route? May be you like to educate yourself about how to edit bus routes properly?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation#Bus_route

Kind regards
Guido
user_5359 (2023-03-25 20:03:47+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15589437 (only one example). What is the meaning of the tag yes=yes?
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-04-22 14:02:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135228709, 135225625 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to fictional edits.
gscholz (2023-03-21 07:37:40+00:00): Hi Samuel,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=36.78423&lat=-1.26980&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=133560969

As you may know this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps. Can you please fix this?

As the OSMI view above clearly shows there are currently a lot of other overlapping ways which a caused by recent bus route edit activities. Can you please contact your colleges and encourage a joint effort to fix those issues? May be you can also initiate a discussion about how to avoid such errors at all? As you are all using JOSM this should not be very difficult.
Kind regards
Guido
Frans S (2023-03-11 18:34:51+00:00): Hello, thanks for mapping here.
About highway tagging:
You tagged highways as track, despite they give access to buildings, farms. 
You tagged a short access road to a building in rural area as residential. Read the wiki please.
Please use the rules how to tag highways on this project according to this wiki.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highways

Read also the remarks about tagging of tracks in the instructions.
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133561199
Frans S (2023-03-11 18:37:12+00:00): About buildings. 
You hardly squared a building. Please map more accurate.
Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. Just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.

Please map each building accurate over the rooflines.

Square each rectangular building with the Q key.

Nodes of buildings may NOT  connect to other buildings or features.

The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 

Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.


See also this document:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/11PsAW0bzUZHbS8YnbaFzqOYhJY7tSPYG/view?usp=share_link


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133561199
:-} (2023-03-13 14:06:43+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1006371710#map=19/52.22420/20.97236&layers= 
Co? Dlaczego błędnie poprawiłeś kszałt geometryczny budynku? Nie jest tak jak powinno być
Rogoyski (2023-07-17 20:18:37+00:00): Jakieś źródło do tego? To jest dla mnie na razie zupełnie nieweryfikowalne za pomocą internetu...
user_20731664 (2024-01-16 07:24:26+00:00): W internecie tego niestety nie ma, zdjęć też nie ma. Mało kto o tym wie. Można zobaczyć jedynie na miejscu. Przywróciłem obiekt do stanu sprzed jego usunięcia
NorthCrab_upload (2023-03-11 17:30:20+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o miejscowości.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10727968134

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
tsp15 (2023-03-17 01:23:56+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1153504335 Pasów rowerowych na jezdni nie mapujemy jako osobne ścieżki.
tsp15 (2023-03-17 01:28:18+00:00): Doczepiłbym się również do tytułu zestawu zmian. Opis "Korekta" niewiele mówi o tym co zmieniłeś na mapie.
Frans S (2023-03-11 18:27:36+00:00): Thanks for mapping on this Project.
Please keep yourself on the instructions what to map.
About highway tagging:
You tagged access to several buildings as a service road. Here, because the road severs several different buildings, the tag should be Unclassified.
Please use the rules how to tag highways on this project according to this wiki.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highways

Read also the remarks about tagging of tracks in the instructions.
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133562532
Nettey (2023-03-11 18:35:59+00:00): Thank you for the correction.
Kovoschiz (2023-03-12 08:31:37+00:00): Please read discussion on `aeroway=runway` and `=swimming_pool`. `lanes=` only make sense on a line. They show directions explicitly.
Kovoschiz (2023-03-12 08:48:11+00:00): Areas also don't explicitly show how the full 400m loop overlaps with the 100m starting line tail.
conradoos (2023-03-12 08:56:58+00:00): Where is this discussion?
The rule is: One feature, one OMS element: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element. So the same track shouldn't be mapped as a polygon and a way.
Kovoschiz (2023-03-13 05:02:11+00:00): And you should read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element#Situations_where_multiple_elements_may_be_needed concerning `natural=water` areas enclosing `waterway=` , as well as `area:highway=` for `highway=` lines.
conradoos (2023-03-13 21:32:13+00:00): But there is a 'small' difference: in these examples for ways are used other tags than for areas. You used the same main tag leisure=track that had been already used for area (multipolygon).
Kovoschiz (2023-03-14 06:05:47+00:00): The fault  is on `leisure=track` being used on areas directly. Linear `leisure=track` is still supported, so that's for compatibility.
conradoos (2023-03-14 17:31:26+00:00): According to wiki leisure=track can be used on areas. What is the problem with compalitibility?
4004 (2023-03-12 23:27:26+00:00): здравствуйте, спасибо за правку (да и за ваш вклад вообще),
теги на русском - это для себя чисто?
bigopenmac (2023-03-13 05:46:30+00:00): Не понимаю вопрос, не нужно было name:ru добавлять или орфография неправильная? Я по образцу делал 8 троллейбуса.
bigopenmac (2023-03-13 15:41:02+00:00): Ага, похоже вопрос был про тэг с именем КУП, исправил на operator, спасибо.
4004 (2023-03-13 15:54:48+00:00): да, именно про него, спасибо
user_5359 (2023-03-24 15:55:37+00:00): К сожалению, еще не все исправлено, см. http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1sQ4.

Unfortunately not everything has been corrected yet, see http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1sQ4.
bigopenmac (2023-04-02 19:43:42+00:00): спасибо, удалил.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-03-11 18:00:45+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nieprawidłowa wartość addr:postcode.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1153507094

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Kovoschiz (2023-03-12 08:35:05+00:00): The `=recreation_ground` is used for the entire greass field. `=pitch` has been used for the exact soccer playing area excluding the border.
conradoos (2023-03-12 10:41:36+00:00): According to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Drecreation_ground the landuse=recreation_ground should be used to the whole area (including all tracks and pitches).
Kovoschiz (2023-03-13 05:15:15+00:00): You should not take wiki as iron rules. This is one of the more unclear tags. If you do take it strictly, it only includes " green space" and "pitches, nets ". It is mostly associated with entire  grass fields, often containing multiple courts. The cover photo is simply a `=playground` that can be enclosed in it casually, if not excluded. 
They have different surfaces. 5k `=recreation_ground` has `surface=` to differentiate.
conradoos (2023-03-13 21:38:37+00:00): But I don't see any argument for using landuse=recreation in the same way as landuse=grass. I understand the wiki that landuse=recreation is in general green, but also includes reacreation equipment and other infrastructure, which is not 'green'.
hatul (2023-12-19 07:26:32+00:00): שלום, מה המקור לשם הנחל? OSM הוא לא מקום להמציא שמות.
hatul (2026-04-29 11:04:25+00:00): השם נמחק
pitscheplatsch (2023-03-12 13:15:37+00:00): Hi,

may we know the source of your mapping activities?

I guess this changeset should be reviewed by the local community.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
mike140 (2023-03-22 10:53:20+00:00): Навіщо ви "провулки" змінюєте на "перевулки"?
avinet_ua (2023-03-22 17:17:17+00:00): можливо, випадково
toc-rox (2023-03-12 06:20:19+00:00): Schön, wenn der Weg jetzt wieder nutzbar ist. Leider ist die Note zum Weg unvollständig. Es wird nicht klar, ob der Sachverhalt vor Ort geprüft wurde.
moosfrosch (2023-03-12 07:52:17+00:00): Was ist an " seit November 2021 viele male kontrolliert " unklar?
Übrigens ist beim parallen laufenden Zaun offenbar noch ein Problem; in der Anzeige erzeugt er im Schnitt zur Wiese einen weißen Keil
toc-rox (2023-03-12 08:56:43+00:00): Der offizielle Verlauf des Tecklenburger Bergpfades führt gar nicht über diesen Wegeabschnitt. Insofern ist die Aussage des Wegewartes "Pfad wurde mehrfach ohne Beanstandungen kontrolliert." vermutlich irrelevant.
moosfrosch (2023-03-13 11:08:16+00:00): OK, da wurde wohl was verwechselt, dort gibt es versch. Karten mit offenbar auch älteren Wegverläufen. Werde nochmal nachfragen.  Aber ich sehe, dass der X18 auch(?) auf diesem Weg läuft, also gleiches Problem inkl. Nicht-Routbarkeit, und habe dafür auch mal den WHB angeschrieben. Warten wir mal ab, ob Antwort kommt.  Mache auch eine Notiz am Marker. 
Leider werden immer mehr bestehende Wege gesperrt, von Forstämtern, Privatwaldbesitzern oder Gemeinden. Mal weil Windbruch nicht geräumt wird (was eigentlich vorgeschrieben ist auf öffentlichen Wegen), mal wegen Haftungsbefürchtungen, mal einfach so weil man die Öffentlichkeit raus haben will. Hatte letztes Jahr so einen Fall am Werra-Burgen-Steig östl. Hann-Münden, Problem scheint noch immer ungelöst zu sein.
JLOSM (2024-08-13 02:13:41+00:00): Hola Federico Explorador,

Por donde esta este trazado como Río Puná, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1153512606/history#map=13/7.2542/-74.4672&layers=D, no figura ninguna corriente de agua en las hojas del IGAC.
aceman444 (2025-05-20 23:51:40+00:00): Zdravim, aky je zdroj tychto nazvov? Obec Predmier nepouziva ulice v adresach. Ano, moze mat napriek tomu ulice pomenovane, ale teda sa ich nazvy nedaju zistit z registra adries a nie su ani v katastri.
Takze odkial nazvy mate? Ako jediny zdroj uvadzate Ortofotomozaiku a tam nazvy samozrejme nie su.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-03-11 18:40:32+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o miejscowości.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/58668378

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
MKnight (2023-03-11 20:28:56+00:00): Moin, willkommen bei OSM.

Korrekte Klassifizierung hier wäre:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:noexit

Ich habe es mal korrigiert.
mapperue (2023-09-05 06:28:00+00:00): Ahoj do názvu objektov sa nezadáva jeho opis ako "Historický prícestný kríž".
Tjuro (2023-03-19 15:03:48+00:00): please note that area=yes on landcover= is not nessesary. landcover is an area by default.
infeeeee (2023-03-11 21:25:28+00:00): Szia!

Járdák rajzolásakor légyszíves frissítsd az úton levő 'sidewalk' címkéket is! Ha a járda külön vonalként van megrajzolva, akkor az úton sidewalk=separate címkének kellene lennie.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sidewalks

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sidewalk%3Dseparate

Köszi! További jó térképezést!
silversurfer83 (2023-03-11 19:49:17+00:00): Hallo und Willkommen bei OpenStreetmap,

du bist zwar schon ein paar Tage registriert und hast deine ersten Änderungen gemacht, aber du bist trotzdem noch recht frisch, daher nutze ich diese Änderung mal um dich freundlich zu begrüßen (oben geschehen) und dir ein paar kleine Handreichungen mit auf den Weg zu geben :)

Deine Kommentare zu deinen Änderungen sind leider bisher sehr nichtssagend. Im Wiki findest du gute Hinweise zu besseren Kommentaren:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

Außerdem ist es immer ganz gut, diesen Artikel im Hinterkopf zu behalten, wenn man nicht regelmäßig auf dem Radar der halben OSM-Welt auftauchen möchte ;)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Grundsätzlich sind diese beiden Seiten sehr gute Einstiege für Anfänger und eine Lektüre erspart viel doppelte Arbeit:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Beginners%27_guide

Falls Fragen sind (sehr wahrscheinlich), gibt es einen Haufen aktive Chatgruppen, von denen die meisten hier aufgelistet sind:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contact_channels#Chats.2Fmessengers

Happy Mapping 
silversurfer83
yitimox (2023-03-12 06:20:03+00:00): stars adlı arkadas subejctif duzenelmeelr yapip haritayi diledigince duzenliyor sikayet etmek gerekir alikam
wille (2023-03-13 19:37:42+00:00): Olá, você poderia disponibilizar a fonte dessa informação? Também não encontrei nada na internet que confirme os nomes que você usou.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133564985
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-04-22 14:02:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135228709, 135225625 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to fictional edits.
Rizky IRM-ED (2023-04-18 03:59:50+00:00): Hi FE Edu VN
A lot of mapping done, great work.
Currently I'm doing line crossing waterbody check using MapRoullete  and I spotted that there's highway added as residential highway (Cầu Triệu Phong) crossing the river (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1153578581) which I can't found any highway in any imagery. Have you any information about this highway or any bridges since it is newly added. Many thanks, cheers!
DiahW IRM-ED (2023-04-18 04:10:25+00:00): Hi, FE Edu VN!

Thank you for mapping contribution! Currently, I'm doing remote mapping to validate line crossing with waterBody. I found two roads crossing with a waterbody,
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1153578571.
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1153578581

Are the two road segments the road that will be built? because both roads are not visible in maxar/bing/mapbox/esri imagery. Do you have any suggestions to resolve this issue?

I really appreciate any information and advice you provide. Thank you

Regards,
Diah