piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Prusaker (2026-06-04 10:27:44+00:00): Извините, но у вас почти все адресные точки указаны неверно.
Название улицы надо указывать согласно правилам именования улиц в OSM для РБ (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Be:Belarus:%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B2%D1%96%D0%BB%D1%8B_%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%BF%D1%96%D1%81%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8F_%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D1%9E)
То есть не "партизанская", а "Партызанская вуліца" и т.п.

В случае, если адресация идёт по названию улицы, то addr:place не используется, а нужно использоваться addr:city.

Адрес, как правило указывается на контуре здания,  а у вас всё отдельными точками сделано.

Как эти почти 6000 точек потом исправлять?

Кроме того есть вопрос с источником данных. Согласно правилам OSM на карту заносятся только те объекты, данные о которых получены лично. То есть нельзя заимствовать данные из карт, которые не дали явное согласие, что их данные могут быть использованы в OSM. Действительно ли вы эти 6000 адресов лично проверили на местности?
Prusaker (2026-06-04 12:12:57+00:00): Предлагаю "откатить" правку, а адреса зданий добавлять понемногу, индивидуально, на контур здания, с правильными тегами улиц и addr:city (addr:place). Это будет лучше, чем исправлять месяцами все эти ошибочные точки.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-11 21:04:27+00:00): 
SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. See https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more information.

SEO spam; bowling alley was already mapped as a building at that location. Reverted in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/185560276
Raio Rene (2026-06-04 15:50:16+00:00): The separation of cycling paths and foot paths is unneccesary, as it is already included under 'cycle & foot path' in the detail of 'separation of cycle and footpaths'. This was pointed out to me by user qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq in the area of Kadriorg. Please revert the change regarding the separation. Otherwise thank you for improving this highly important location.
Zverik (2026-06-07 20:15:25+00:00): Hey Martinus, you have changed widths of some cycleways near the Tondi viadukt. How exactly did you measure those?

Asking because I've updated widths after manually measuring those with a tape measure. Were those incorrect?
Zverik (2026-06-07 20:53:01+00:00): Also, you have added bicycle=designated to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1384389869 . Are there really signs or road markings designating this stretch as a bicycle paths? I could not find those a month ago.
Raio Rene (2026-06-08 12:34:50+00:00): I have been there personally and yes, this is a "JJJ or kergliiklustee" or in other words, both bicycle and foot path. https://linnatransport.ee/et/kohustusm-rgid/m-rk-435
Raio Rene (2026-06-08 12:39:18+00:00): but I personally think that the bike and walking path separation in the Tondi viadukt area is unneccesary, as the separation of bicycle-pedestrian paths are specified under the "Cycle & Foot Path". Should I manually change these paths back to "Cycle & Foot Paths"?
Zverik (2026-06-08 14:05:08+00:00): I have no opinion on way separation, both would be okay :) To me what matter is that the "designated" value reflects the signs and markings.
Makeena (2026-06-03 23:05:05+00:00): Another weirdly large changeset area. All edits should be around the area from Brunau to Entlisberg
Udarian (2026-06-03 21:29:27+00:00): looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it.

Happy mapping,
Udar.
wolfbert (2026-07-14 09:52:50+00:00): Hallo, zu diesem Punkt gibt es im OSM-Forum unter https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/wie-treffpunkt-taggen/145155 eine Diskussion, wie das Tagging ev. treffender gestaltet werden könnte.

Gibt es vor Ort irgendeinen physischen Hinweis auf diesen Treffpunkt (Schild, Einstieg o.ä.)?
NorthCrab_upload (2026-06-03 22:32:11+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13908279476
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/260960420

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-06-03 22:42:24+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13908279476
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/260960420

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Zwyklak (2026-06-11 19:07:07+00:00): naprawione w tym zestawie zmian https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/260960420#map=19/53.022171/18.683832&layers=N
GeeMaps! (2026-07-06 02:29:53+00:00): Hello Maradona11. Is this western segment of Maxwell Rd actually open to the public, for either foot or car traffic? Thanks.
Dzmitry_Nikulin (2026-07-06 12:02:54+00:00): Hello! Thanks for mapping this area. I noticed you added Darlington Drive, Harrington Drive, and Heartwood Drive near 29 Mile Road.

Could you please share your source or reference for these street names? Currently, they aren't visible on standard satellite imageries on OSM, and I couldn't find them in the publicly available websites. It would be awesome if you could point me to the subdivision plat map or planning document you used so we can ensure everything is aligned perfectly.

Thanks for your help and for contributing to OSM!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183615862
BCNorwich (2026-06-06 05:32:01+00:00): Hi, I wonder is Way: 1525938962 a tunnell or a bridge, you've mapped it as both?

Also, the sections of bridge (steps and footways) need a layer tag to show the relevant elevation between them.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2026-06-06 07:16:30+00:00): Hi, Same comments as above for the ways within the bridge outline Way: 1525938958

Regards Bernard.
JonnyW03 (2026-06-06 15:49:23+00:00): Thank you, I'll be fixing these following your advice from the spiral staircase.
MappingMore (2026-06-04 11:20:20+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset ID:183639616
Udarian (2026-06-04 00:47:01+00:00): First of all, as per https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/unifying-florida-ref-and-other-related-tagging-sr-vs-fl/141158/33 we use "SR" in ref's in Florida so the ref should have been added as "SR T". Second of all I have never heard mainline Florida's Turnpike referred to as "FL T" or "SR T", so I am pretty sure that the ref you added is more than likely incorrect.

Happy mapping,
Udar.
Udarian (2026-06-04 01:00:41+00:00): also I'm pretty sure that ramps can have ref's and unsigned_ref's on them
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-06-04 01:27:43+00:00): I am aware of that. However, Florida's Turnpike is not a state highway (not a signed one, anyway). "FL T" is short for "Florida's Turnpike," whereas "SR T" would mean "State Road T," which is just... wrong on a thousand levels...

And yes, ramps _can_ have ref=* tags. However, in this case, the freeway begins at the convergence of the two on-ramps. Same for the other direction: It ends at the fork.
Udarian (2026-06-04 01:37:16+00:00): again, I have never heard it referred to as "FL T"
Udarian (2026-06-04 01:38:08+00:00): we don't just abbreviate a name because we want to, that's what short_*=* is for.
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-06-04 01:41:01+00:00): Does the Turnpike have some sort of road number that it is referred to? If not, then all the ways should be tagged with noref=yes.
Udarian (2026-06-04 01:45:59+00:00): it already has a ref, the unsigned_ref. It's got a name and the FDOT unsigned_ref.
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-06-04 01:46:20+00:00): I have removed them: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183619039
Udarian (2026-06-04 01:46:53+00:00): things can just have a unsigned_ref and no ref if that is how it is in the real world.
Udarian (2026-06-04 01:47:43+00:00): as in a unsigned_ref and no ref what so ever.
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-06-04 03:59:53+00:00): Okay, I found something: https://www.google.com/maps/@25.9202511,-80.216001,3a,15y,301.04h,90.54t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1suzN5SoaNKgM0fU6QL54YPQ!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fcb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26pitch%3D-0.5357118354995123%26panoid%3DuzN5SoaNKgM0fU6QL54YPQ%26yaw%3D301.03547681334476!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI2MDYwMS4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D

There is a sign proudly proclaiming that one of the destinations is "FL TPK." Is this abbreviation used anywhere else?
Udarian (2026-06-04 04:25:35+00:00): Just because it's used as an abbreviation in some places doesn't mean that it should be put in the ref. Not every highway=motorway needs a ref as long as it has a unsigned_ref of some sort and ideally a name which mainline Florida's Turnpike does. Also, when there isn't any other ref in a way the unsigned_ref is the ref because it is a real ref, it just is not signed. 
Also google cannot be used as a source for OSM contributions.
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-06-04 04:39:51+00:00): Even if a motorway has the key unsigned_ref=* filled out, validators (like those on Osmosis) will still warn editors about "motorway[s] without ref=*, int_ref=*, nat_ref=*, or reg_ref=*".
I used Bing Streetside (provided by iD) at the exact same location as the link, and it shows the same sign with the same text (including "FL TPK").
NE2 (2026-06-04 15:05:09+00:00): Don't tag for the validator.
Udarian (2026-06-05 14:50:13+00:00): Just as an FYI, I put a question about this on the OSMUS slack, feel free to leave a comment, I am looking to see what the community consensus on this is.
the link is https://osmus.slack.com/archives/C2VJAJCS0/p1780670048364089 .

Happy mapping,
Udar.
stevea (2026-06-05 21:11:24+00:00): It's Forest of Nisene Marks State Park.  Remember, we sign our names to everything here.  It's OK, mistakes happen.  I'm not sure everyone knows UC means under construction, I had to think about it for a minute.

Chunks like this often get managed / curated by a knowledge representative, perhaps this is you.  It's a good size chunk of area for focus, and sparse (seem largely blank, but not really blank) as is.

I'm sparse here (hiking, exploring); it's rough, for sure.  I'm only vaguely aware of edges of this area.  I do know other mappers who hike and bike here.

"Accurately" tagged is best.  Sometimes that gets difficult but our consensus eventually hammers it out.

Really, anywhere is ripe for some of-the-moment improvement. Do keep up with dialog from others who may disagree or tag otherwise.  That very dialog itself is important.

With a tap-tap here and a tap-tap there....
isaacibex (2026-06-08 15:58:09+00:00): Hi Stevea - sorry for the misspelling and the short hand - I'll try to be more accurate in the future. I'm not sure I fully understand what you are saying. I do a decent amount of trail running and biking in Forest of Nisene Marks SP, so I can ground truth specific questions as they arise. Do you have questions about the change set or things I can be doing better here? I've been on OSM for ages, but have been getting more involved recently.
stevea (2026-06-08 17:55:37+00:00): Thanks for replying so quick.  The misspelling and abbreviation were small things, almost not worth mentioning.

What I mean is that some people might disagree with you about your specific tagging (what is legal as to access), so "listening skills" as to what others say about those around here are important.  I'm not saying your tagging is wrong, simply that others might have some dispute, and to be open to their views if disagreements about specific access tags here arise in the future.  (They have in the past).

Happy mapping!
isaacibex (2026-06-08 20:03:11+00:00): That makes sense - is there a talk page or anything where that debate has been hashed out in the past? I did some searching and didn't find anything - lots of discourse in other areas but not santa cruz specific. The "illegal" but widely used MTB trail system in santa cruz is complicated and such debates have prompted a lot of ink spilled in other places. I definitely access illegal trails from time to time and don't think they are inherently bad, but do think that people should know the legal status of the trails on which the recreate, and be able to make decisions according to their own ethical framework and evolving relationships with land managers. Do you have any suggestions here? That was why I used the tagging I had seen for trails at UC Santa Cruz in my edits. Thanks!
stevea (2026-06-08 20:13:47+00:00): There isn't any specific talk pages (or topic in our Discourse forum) that I know of for the contentious (less so now, it has calmed down in the last several years) topic of "mountain bike mapping in Santa Cruz County."

There are OSM Contributors in and around FNMSP (Ken Adelman, others) and OSM Contributors in and around UCSC and the very touchy areas in western Henry Cowell State Park (not Fall Creek Unit, the part that abuts UCSC).  Over the years, the tagging on these trails has evolved to where it is now...but I always expect there to be friction about exact access tags on particular trails, as those have vacillated heavily between "this" or "that" Contributor.  Sometimes "sparks fly" (disagreements erupt) but for the most part, people are earnestly trying to get everything right.

The "lesson" that seems to shake out at the end is "please listen closely to your fellow mappers, even to the point of changing YOUR tags to THEIR tags, as they are more 'provably' correct."  I've actually telephoned the state police officers who enforce mtb trails west of Hwy 9 between UCSC and HCRSP to get both the law and the notice of posting of what the local rules are because that was the most definitive "verifiably legal" method that I knew how to establish what the "rules" are.

Simply stated:  be aware this is a shared map, sometimes disagreements arise, and if/when they do, please listen.

Again, Happy Mapping.
isaacibex (2026-06-08 20:55:15+00:00): Hi Stevea, thanks for your thoughtful comments, I appreciate your willingness to help bring me up to speed in this way.  Rest assured that I will definitely orient towards collaboration here - please don't hesitate to let me know if you (or anyone else reading this thread) have suggestions - I want this shared map to be the best it can be and that happens when we work together. All the best, and happy mapping.
stevea (2026-06-08 21:21:39+00:00): 👍
VLD0251 (2026-07-09 19:52:21+00:00): The Arabic name appears to contain a duplicate term; please verify
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8011023340
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8011023339 !!
Udarian (2026-06-04 00:23:38+00:00): From what I can tell HEFT is more of a short name than a ref.

happy mapping,
Udar
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-06-04 01:23:15+00:00): Huh. Well, in many other states, a short name is used for a motorway's ref=* tag. Think of New York's Turnpikes.
ieguy3 (2026-06-04 00:16:15+00:00): I didn't add the address because the sign is so faded it was hard to see. but its located near the abandoned railroad
Udarian (2026-06-04 01:14:52+00:00): way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/190145443 is part of Palmetto expressway and is referred to as such.

happy mapping,
Udar.
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-06-04 01:30:49+00:00): Done, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183618801
ScrawnyMeowth1 (2026-06-05 01:24:29+00:00): Is this location correct? All I can see here is an open field.
pitscheplatsch (2026-06-04 07:04:51+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
Is the name real?
North Luzon Expressway
woodpeck (2026-06-04 08:47:49+00:00): This changeset has deleted a lot of data. "newwww" is not a good enough explanation of such an edit. The edit has been reverted.
GunGoose22 (2026-06-13 06:00:15+00:00): Poi not Pov, not sure how that mistype happened lol.
Wildsharky (2026-06-10 05:32:07+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:183725826
Lê Tuấn Minh (2026-06-15 03:10:43+00:00): Cho mình hỏi, cái đoạn ngã tư đường CT.16 bạn sửa ấy mình tra ảnh vệ tinh thì có vẻ chưa khớp, mình đối chiếu mấy nguồn ảnh vệ tinh xem rồi, không biết thực tế có khớp không nhỉ để mình sửa lại tại nút giao này
Lê Tuấn Minh (2026-06-15 03:56:38+00:00): Cái này để mình sửa luôn nhé
Leo Slager (2026-06-06 11:26:57+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Leo Slager (2026-06-06 11:29:39+00:00): Hallo Ronald,

Goed om te weten dat gebouwen en adressen rechtstreeks worden geïmporteerd vanuit de BAG van het Kadaster.
De adressen staan dan op een aparte node op de kaart en dus niet op de omtrek van het gebouw.

veel plezier met verder mappen.
Leo
RonaldSloot (2026-06-12 11:04:43+00:00): Ah ok :) dat was me niet helemaal duidelijk omdat de gebouwen zo expliciet een deel hadden met betrekking tot het adres. Ik zal daar in de toekomst rekening mee houden
Udarian (2026-06-04 04:13:10+00:00): what is your source that busses have started stopping at the bus stop at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1039651984 again, aka whats your source for changing it from was:highway=bus_stop to highway=bus_stop?

Happy mapping,
Udar.
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-06-04 04:33:22+00:00): An iD suggestion to upgrade the tags.
Udarian (2026-06-04 04:41:58+00:00): that iD issue is one that I ignore right now because I don't see how else to tag that there used to be a bus stop at the location, I normally would delete but in the case of this area as there is so much construction some of the bus stops along Northwest 7th Avenue and around the GGI will likely open back up once construction finishes, especially because Northwest 7th Avenue is being widened a bit as part of the construction from my understanding.
GEORG OBEREDER EU (2026-06-04 08:23:48+00:00): Thanks for pointing that out. I wasn’t sure about the tags, so in future I won’t include websites in `name=*` and will only use `height` if reliable data is available.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-18 14:18:51+00:00): Thanks; happy mapping
NorthCrab_upload (2026-06-04 04:31:15+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1525978425

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
pitscheplatsch (2026-06-04 07:03:16+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
Is the name real?
AmandaPutri (5461430954), v2
FajrAl (2026-06-04 14:22:20+00:00): private data
mavl (2026-06-10 06:18:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183906066 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20776].
mavl (2026-06-05 13:37:19+00:00): Здраствуйте. Этот пакет правок удалил фрагмент дороги. Подскажите, пожалуйста, как мог исчезнуть участок грунтовой дороги?
Dellin25 (2026-06-08 02:23:46+00:00): Добрый день. Тут видимо ошибочно было сделано. Сейчас верну данный участок дороги. Информация от водителей ТК, что к заводу сверху нет проезда. Проезд возможен только с Ялутовского тракта.
DD1GJ (2026-06-12 19:02:05+00:00): Restaurant wurde heute eröffnet, Hotel nächste Woche. Habs vor Ort im Blick
gscholz (2026-06-10 07:10:36+00:00): Hi geosphere01,
your latest edits have created several errors regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=35.69467&lat=-6.21373&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges

As you may know, this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps.

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
FUZZY_42 (2026-06-08 19:08:10+00:00): Посольство? Чьё посольство?
NieWnen (2026-06-04 13:18:16+00:00): Nie wiem czym jest ten Wandrer i w jaki sposób to wpływa na to, ale ta zmiana jest nieprawidłowa.

To zewnętrzne oprogramowanie powinno się dostosować do tagowania OSM i tam powinno zostać to zgłoszone, bo takie tagowanie jest poprawne. 

Nic tutaj nie wprowadza w błąd. Zachęcam do zajrzenia, czym jest sidewalk=separate na wiki.
rdrozd (2026-06-08 11:07:54+00:00): Dzięki, doczytam. Widzę że już przywróciłeś, przepraszam za zamieszanie.
ieguy3 (2026-06-04 06:16:26+00:00): https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/0722d75371734dcfade1289e4f0e3a26
ForestWhisperer (2026-06-06 13:47:46+00:00): Hey achte bitte darauf dass die Website URLs immer mit https:// oder http:// beginnen. Ich hab das mal gefixt :)
boffie (2026-06-06 14:11:42+00:00): Hi, danke für den Hinweis und danke für's Fixen!
rarad74 (2026-06-04 07:50:58+00:00): Hi. You must use romanian diacritics ( with correct character coding). Do not add anymore names withouth diacritics. Ask for someone to add if you cannot. Correct name is Aleea Sârbenilor. Thanks.
WanakaLake (2026-06-05 08:23:37+00:00): Hello rarad74. Thank you for your input , I will keep diacritics in mind moving forward. Thanks!
qstep (2026-06-04 07:48:55+00:00): Most akkor ki van írva a magasság vagy sem?
revlev (2026-06-04 14:38:41+00:00): A magasságkorlátozás ki van táblázva, súlykorlátozás nincs.
qstep (2026-06-04 15:12:00+00:00): Rendben, csak azt állítottad be, hogy nincs kiírva. Javítottam: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183651686
qstep (2026-06-04 15:13:00+00:00): Megkövetem magam: a súlykorlátozásra állítottad be. Elnézést.
Frans S (2026-06-04 12:01:39+00:00): Thanks for mapping.
Please be more accurate when you map a building. Your mappings do not always reflect the actual situations
Best regards
ieguy3 (2026-06-04 06:36:58+00:00): this part is the conservation authority different agency from the regional park
NaufalFarras (2026-06-04 06:55:17+00:00): Hello. Please do not add nonexistent bus stop as highway=bus_stop or public_transport=platform. This would mess up bus stop location. Virtual stops are acceptable only at terminus. Thanks
ptrider (2026-06-19 00:49:52+00:00): ok, noted. should I remove those stops?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183626949
NaufalFarras (2026-06-19 08:11:50+00:00): Hi. I have removed most stops in that route
Leo Slager (2026-06-06 23:25:11+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
ManuelB701 (2026-06-04 10:21:02+00:00): Hallo AGF075,

warum hast die Linie 91 (und nur die Versionen nach Ginsheim) als eine reine RMV-Linie umklassifiziert, obwohl sie doch eine Linie ist, die regelmäßig ins RNN-Gebiet fährt und auch auf der RNN-Seite aufgelistet ist?

Viele Grüße
Manuel
rajdhani (2026-06-07 11:54:16+00:00): Reverted in changeset id: 183776739
NorthCrab_upload (2026-06-04 07:51:31+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, zamień addr:place na addr:city. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13017569909

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀