piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_5359 (2023-07-28 15:21:54+00:00): Welcome to OSM! What is the mean of the foreign tags
Cidade=São João do Triunfo
Comunidade=Faxinal
Estado=Paraná
eggie (2023-07-29 12:22:50+00:00): Dag Omied..

Zou 'Fiets- en wandelbrug Sysselt' nu de officiële straatnaam zijn.
In de BGT transparant zie ik Sysseltsepad?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-07-29 12:26:25+00:00): Zie... 
https://www.verbeterdekaart.nl/#?geometry.x=175252.69&geometry.y=448679.03&zoomlevel=13.28

Ik pas het even aan.. Mocht het niet kloppen dan een terugmelding doen naar de BGT/Kadaster Verbeter de kaart.
Voorlopig volg ik de officiële benaming. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-07-29 12:35:39+00:00): OmiedC,
De aansluiting aan de noordzijde met de Peletonlaan heb ik iets aangepast mbv Satellietdataportaal.
Denk dat survey nog wel nodig is.

MVG
eggie
totera (2023-07-29 22:25:36+00:00): Reverted: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139190682
user_5359 (2023-07-28 15:19:39+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please take a look on https://www.osm.org/node/11073331651. What is the mean of the foreign tags 
Bacia Hidrográfica=Tibagi
Cidade=Palmeira
Comunidade=Faxinal
Estado=Paraná
Vegetação=Estepe Gramíneo Lenhosa
?
BCNorwich (2023-07-29 07:36:28+00:00): Hello, I wonder if the path Way: 1192938783 is really separated from the old railway Way: Skipton & Colne (1085183330)? Or as is often the case the path is actually on the line of the old railway,(one actual feature)? There is a further problem with the track Way: 1085183332 joined to the bridge your path and the railway, it doesn't look right.

Regards Bernard.
Mappa Outdoor (2023-08-02 13:40:37+00:00): Hi Bernard
You are right.  The added path (recently designated as a permissive path) follows the line of the Abandoned Railway (no railtrack).  In addition certain lengths of the track are also used as a farm access track.
For the purposes of ease of editing I have kept these 3 elements separate from each other.
The section from Barnoldwick Road heading south to the Leeds-Liverpool Canal needs further work as one of the old rail bridges has been demolished.  The course of the abandoned rail line can pass over this gap, but the paths must drop down of the embankment and back up again after the gap.  This element is still to survey and add to the map.
After the edit is complete I can then move the rail line, the path and the access track on top of each other as you observed.
The other problem you mentioned (1085183332) has been re-edited.  I think it is correct now.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-07-28 14:40:41+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/675771499

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
user_5359 (2023-07-28 15:17:54+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please take a look on https://www.osm.org/node/11073355289. What is the mean of the foreign tags
Cidade=Palmeira
Comunidade=Faxinal
Estado=Paraná
Fonte=Projeto Nova Cartografia Social;2009
Nome=Queimadas
?
Bem-vindo ao OSM! Dê uma olhada em https://www.osm.org/node/11073355289. Qual é a média das tags estrangeiras?
user_5359 (2023-07-28 15:24:29+00:00): Welcome to OSM (again)! Same question again. Please notice we use only British englisch for the keys. Please take a look on https://wiki.osm.org.

Bem-vindo ao OSM (novamente)! Novamente a mesma pergunta. Observe que usamos apenas o inglês britânico para as chaves. Dê uma olhada em https://wiki.osm.org.
user_5359 (2023-08-08 14:30:49+00:00): Você conhece o site https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/297805? Podemos apagar as suas tentativas?

Are you familiar with the website https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/297805? Can we delete your attempts?
APneunzehn74 (2024-08-09 14:48:35+00:00): Kann man die wheelchair Beschreibung löschen? Der Shop ist mittlerweile als Lebensmittel Geschäft eingetragen, und für Rollstuhl Fahrer macht die Beschreibung keinen Sinn 
Grüße Andreas
adrianojbr (2023-07-28 17:55:17+00:00): Olá, Bortolini D!

Parabéns para o excelente mapeamento rural que você vem fazendo.

Para te ajudar ainda mais, sugiro usar os traços Strava com mais qualidade para alinhar vias e outros elementos, conforme https://erickdeoliveiraleal.medium.com/tutorial-strava-openstreetmap-josm-or-id-2e2003f4aea3

Cabe lembrar que é o registro principalmente de ciclistas e pedestres, então tem que ter atenção ao mapear as vias por essa camada. Mas, sem dúvidas, são ótimos para conferir o alinhamento das imagens de satélite.

Mais importante ainda porque se deve evitar o alinhamento de elementos exclusivamente com base em imagens de satélite. Há distorções devido as fotos serem em 2D representando um mundo 3D.

Mais informações em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Align_aerial_imagery_before_tracing.

Abraço!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139136510
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2023-07-29 13:44:17+00:00): 最好一次只在一个地区做编辑，不要在全国编辑完一起上传
画一点就及时保存
不然这个边界框会覆盖全国的
全国mapper一起围观

另外，欢迎来到OSM世界，恭喜您做出了第一笔编辑
Fizzie-DWG (2023-12-19 16:01:19+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145297936
Fizzie-DWG (2023-12-19 16:00:17+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145297898
Frans S (2023-08-14 10:11:43+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings need to be improved to meet the quality standards of HOTOSM.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document for more info)
A: E: Not accurately drawn and squared.
E: Most buildings are fair rectangular. Square them with the Q key when the object is selected.
* When buildings have L, U shape or protruding elements, they should be included into your mappings.
* Sometimes it looks like there is a kink in a garbled or saddle-shaped roof. This is because the image was taken at an angle. Such a roof is simply rectangular.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139137403
DiogoBaptista98 (2023-08-03 03:50:03+00:00): mapping temporary features is strongly discouraged.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_map_temporary_events_and_temporary_features
eggie (2023-07-28 15:11:59+00:00): Je attractie heb ik weer verwijderd. Wat is de bedoeling?

MVG
eggie
mini-me (2023-07-28 16:19:21+00:00): Нет, вот так делать точно не надо. Для подобного есть area:highway=*, но и он не должен заливать всё подряд.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11073443833
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7276095597
Во многих местах не приклеилась к домам или исказила геометрию.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1377719223
А тут приклеена к дорожке, что тоже неправильно.

Короче, это проще откатить, чем исправить
dpolovinkin (2023-07-28 16:29:55+00:00): Привет, ты имеешь ввиду не надо так делать пешеходную зону? Было бы просто классно если бы это было отдельно выделено, я такую штуку просто увидел на главной пешеходной улице в Белграде Kneza Mihaila и там это прямо неплохо выглядит на карте, что прямо пешеходная зона.

Я могу откатить а потом можно подумать как можно быть это по красоте сделать) чтобы все таки было выделено что пешеходная
mini-me (2023-07-28 16:47:31+00:00): Да. По сути, ты проложил новую, несуществующую улицу. В Белграде это какая-то дичь и мапинг под рендер.

area:highway на openstreetmap.org не отображается, но можно посмотреть в OsmAnd. Например, Марсово Поле:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15745620
dpolovinkin (2023-07-28 17:02:30+00:00): дичь хехе)
понял, спасибо! я в общем ревертнул тогда все мои те changesets по созданию этой зоны...

то есть по идее можно делать эту зону аля так - area:highway=pedestrian ?
mini-me (2023-07-28 17:30:43+00:00): Если очень хочется, то можно. По-моему скромному мнению, для обычных узких улочек это излишество, усложняющее редактирование и не несущее никакой пользы.
dpolovinkin (2023-07-28 20:50:40+00:00): окей!) ну у тебя опыт в коммитинге в OSM настолько катастрофически больше чем у меня, что прислушаюсь и забью на эту идею :))
Andrea Musuruane (2023-07-28 17:39:04+00:00): Ciao. Per favore, non attaccare i landuse ad altre feature come fermate del bus o le strade. Grazie.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139138506
Technotion (2024-05-05 00:28:09+00:00): Is this still here?
HubMiner (2023-12-27 14:58:23+00:00): Hello,  when entering an opening_hours value, please don't end it with a semicolon - this is triggering cleanup warnings.  I recommend this tool for self checking: https://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/?

Thanks!
PCarew_EG (2024-01-02 15:02:18+00:00): Thanks for the heads up! I will check our team's edits for this. We generally use https://projets.pavie.info/yohours/ or the opening hours plugin in JOSM. The JOSM validator doesn't seem to pick up that a semi-colon at the end isn't needed, etc. 

Out of interest where is it triggering warnings?
HubMiner (2024-01-06 07:55:38+00:00): The warnings are coming from Osmose (see the URL).  That checks for multiple issues against the opening_hours.  Feel free to get in touch if you have questions about it.

https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/#zoom=8&lat=46.034&lon=-73.3&item=3250&level=1%2C2%2C3&tags=&fixable=online&useDevItem=all
AkuAnakTimur (2023-07-28 14:42:46+00:00): LOL "no comment". I must have missed to fill it in - the usual stuff, really.
eggie (2023-07-28 15:10:22+00:00): Dag Tineke.. Een historic=monument is een graftombe.
Deze heb ik verwijderd.

De bunker staat al op de kaart je info heb ik toegevoegd als description.

Kijk in de wiki hoe bunkers te mappen.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-07-28 15:20:47+00:00): name= niet gebruiken om iets te beschrijven..
Dus niet name=bankje  name=huis.. dus ook niet name=groepsschuilplaats
osmviborg (2023-07-28 15:02:29+00:00): 'description' ikke 'name'
pitscheplatsch (2023-07-30 09:52:13+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139202371
pitscheplatsch (2023-07-30 09:52:43+00:00): Hi,

please don't add test data to the live OSM Server. If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
dpolovinkin (2023-07-30 09:55:26+00:00): ah, cool, thanks a lot! I didn't know that there is a test server, will use it for things like that in the future! :)
eggie (2023-07-28 15:17:00+00:00): Dag Tisa..
Nicht access=private 
... yes ist für Jedermann. 
Gruss,
eggie
eggie (2023-07-29 08:44:09+00:00): Access=private ist oke..
Aber access=yes gehört hier nicht
Gruss
Eggie
mueschel (2023-08-02 12:32:18+00:00): Hi,
'payment' tags are used to tag how payment can be done. It seems you used them to tag the kind of permit needed. 
I suggest to change them to either a 'permit  = A1' tag
or to a 'parking:zone=A1' tag
Jakka (2023-07-28 16:46:05+00:00): name=Zitbank
Naamgeving zijn officiële naam toewijzingen.
Zitbank is een beschrijving en zit vervat in bench
Graag een aanpassing thx (verwijderen name code)
Illio (2023-08-15 11:37:31+00:00): Zdravím, z akého zdroja ste čerpali názov "Most Karola Róberta"?

Apropo, objekty na štátnej hranici majú mať meno uvedené podľa:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multilingual_names#Shared_boundary_features
mapperue (2023-08-15 12:33:53+00:00): Ahoj, je to preklad maďarského názvu, ktorý sa používa v maďarských médiách.
Illio (2023-08-15 15:06:20+00:00): Tomu rozumiem, ale nikde som nenašiel, že takýto preklad je aj oficiálny slovenský názov mosta.
mapperue (2023-08-15 15:11:00+00:00): Ponechám tam iba maďarský názov ako pred mojou úpravou.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-08-02 18:49:38+00:00): Can you use more specific changeset comments?

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Jakka (2023-07-28 16:47:33+00:00): Naamgeving zijn officiële naam toewijzingen.
kunstwerk is een beschrijving en zit vervat in artwork
Graag een aanpassing thx (verwijderen name code)
Kalepom (2023-07-29 22:00:45+00:00): Bonjour Bernardo,
Le tag advertising=portail que tu as placé sur cet objet https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11073083108 n'est pas un tag habituellement utilisé dans les descriptions de panneau publicitaire. Peux-tu me dire ce que tu as voulu indiquer par cela, afin qu'on essaie de le corriger ? Merci
os-emmer (2023-09-25 15:41:13+00:00): Hi Lars,
hat der Bücherschrank wirklich einen Namen? Bzw. woher hast du den "name=Bücherschrank Niederpleis" genommen?
Frans S (2023-08-06 10:27:17+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings need to be improved to meet the quality standards of HOTOSM.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document for more info)

A: Not accurately drawn.
C: Collecting multiple buildings and mapping them as 1 building.
D: Connecting nodes of buildings to other buildings or features like roads and residential areas.
E. Buildings not squared.
Do not tag buildings as residential areas, just map the building itself

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139141109
eggie (2023-07-28 15:56:42+00:00): Dag mvf

Ik heb de naam van het gebouw gehaald, want die staat ook al op het terrein.
MVG
eggie
maciek-szn (2023-07-28 20:05:22+00:00): Wycofane.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139141386
maciek-szn (2023-07-28 20:05:16+00:00): Wycofane.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139141487
Road–Runner (2024-02-09 21:56:34+00:00): Hallo Michael. Ich glaube nicht, dass am Blasiusberg wirklich eine Fußgängerzone ist? Was wolltest du genau damit kartieren? Für eine Fußgängerzone braucht es auch eigentlich das offizielle Verkehrsschild.
michaelg_at (2024-02-10 06:56:41+00:00): In Innsbruck sind da viele Sachen gemapped die bei einer strengen definition von Fußgängerzone durchfallen https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1HaE

Besonders auch ähnliche Kirchenvorplätze wie:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/168080726 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/47198117 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4971259

Einen "Vorplatz Sillpark": https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/97819333

Und andere arten von plätze: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9911080 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4086851 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7728796 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7728690 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/105563068 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/281646592

Ich sehe da nicht den großen unterschied zwischen dem was ich da gemapped habe und was da in Innsbruck so als pedestrian area gekennzeichnet ist.
Road–Runner (2024-02-15 17:34:38+00:00): Danke fur die Antwort. Stimmt, wenn man es so betrachtet hast du recht. Und das wichtigste Kriterium bei dieser Terrasse ist ja erfüllt: es ist hauptsächlich für Fußgänger gedacht.

Ich war so frei und hab ansonsten das level Attribut bei den Gehsteigen und Wegen entfernt. Das ist eigentlich bei Graphen nur für den Fall gedacht, wenn sich Straßen und Wege kreuzungsfrei schneiden.

Außerdem hab ich noch den Namen der Kapelle ausgebessert (-> https://de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leerzeichen_in_Komposita -> https://gis.tirol.gv.at/kunstkatasterpdf/pdf/67897.pdf).

Schöne Grüße
RR
pitscheplatsch (2023-07-29 15:25:44+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139176943
pitscheplatsch (2023-07-29 15:26:50+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139176912
dpolovinkin (2023-07-29 21:28:01+00:00): hi, can you say why you reverted the changes? thanks!
dpolovinkin (2023-07-29 21:29:31+00:00): DMG decided that such translations are not allowed and were incorrect
dpolovinkin (2023-07-29 21:33:01+00:00): DWG*
pitscheplatsch (2023-07-29 15:24:33+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139176867
okwithmydecay (2023-09-27 16:06:47+00:00): This POI is in the wrong place or has the wrong street address, it has an address of 39 Upper St, yet the addresses nearby are in single digits
Peter Newman (2023-09-27 17:42:52+00:00): Hi @okaywithmydecay,

I assume you mean https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/348426185 ?

I didn't add the address number, but both the old FHRS data and the old occupant's website seem to think it was that number:
https://ratings.food.gov.uk/business/570656
https://www.phocafe.co.uk/locations/islington/

The fact it was listed on their website and yet I'd marked it as disused was a bit odd. Having searched I think it's moved and the wrong data got entered for the wrong venue at the wrong time.
This is also 39 Upper Street, but with no conflicting or matching shop name:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31324105

#surveyme
okwithmydecay (2023-09-28 14:25:44+00:00): Yes, that's the one. I was confused as to which address the POI belonged to, so I created a new one for Blank Street Coffee https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11222906487
Fizzie-DWG (2023-12-19 15:59:20+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145297876
literan (2023-07-29 13:00:56+00:00): дубль зачем-то создали. Откачу
pangoSE (2024-08-07 12:57:59+00:00): Tusen tack för att du la in denna. Jag har matchat den med Wikidata idag, se https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q115269331
Herman Lee (2023-08-03 10:54:06+00:00): 该修改集已退回
This changeset has been reverted
本修改集可能存在新增标签，请后人仔细核实
Please revive this changeset
Duja (2023-08-21 12:05:36+00:00): What kind of relation are those "local networks"? They are not signposted for sure, and not official in any way.
Rainero (2023-08-02 20:35:19+00:00): Hallo dmlls,

bei der Straße https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/481463953 passen ein paar Dinge nicht mehr: sie hat jetzt 2 Namen und sidewalk=both;left ergibt keinen Sinn. Zusätzlich hast du die Gehsteige nochmal separat eingezeichnet, so dass sie nun in den Daten mehrfach vorhanden sind.
Was wolltest du denn bezwecken? Wenn du möchtest, kann ich gerne unterstützen.

Viele Grüße,
Rainer
dmlls (2023-08-03 18:59:57+00:00): Hallo Rainer,

Das tut mir leid, offenbar hat Vespucci ein Chaos angerichtet. Ich habe die Änderungen bereits korrigiert (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139407378). Könntest du einen Blick darauf werfen und sehen, ob alles in Ordnung ist?

Viele Grüße,
Diego
Rainero (2023-08-04 21:13:19+00:00): Hallo Diego,
danke für die schnelle Korrektur.
Ich habe die Gehsteige und Straßen noch ein bisschen nachbearbeitet. Das separate Kartieren von Gehsteigen hat einige Fallstricke. Man muss sehr genau alle Querungsmöglichkeiten der Straße, v.a.an Einmündungen und Kreuzungen ergänzen, sonst macht man Fußgängerrouting kaputt. Außerdem muss man die Attribute "sidewalk" an der Straße anpassen, sonst führt es zu doppelt kartierten Gehsteigen. In diesem Falle sidewalk:both=separate statt sidewalk=both (sidewalk=left|right|both ist für nicht separat kartierte Gehsteige).  Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139457905 bzw. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=139457905

Servus,
Rainer
dmlls (2023-08-08 11:59:42+00:00): Hallo Rainer,

super! Vielen Dank für Ihren Hinweis, beim nächsten Mal weiß ich, wie ich es richtig kennzeichnen muss.

VG,
Diego
Robert Wysocki (2023-07-28 16:53:56+00:00): Przykłady niepoprawnego routingu: 

https://brouter.de/brouter-web/#map=18/52.25708/21.03252/cyclosm,route-quality&lonlats=21.031145,52.25741;21.033846,52.25723

https://brouter.de/brouter-web/#map=17/52.25591/21.03338/cyclosm,route-quality&lonlats=21.035868,52.254047;21.033846,52.25723
gscscnd (2023-07-29 05:48:04+00:00): footway=sidewalk jest dla chodników biegnących wzdłuż ulic.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:footway
user_5359 (2023-07-28 19:52:25+00:00): Hello! Please take a look on https://www.osm.org/way/386459152/history. What is the mean of the tag namber=6? Did you mean addr
:housenumber?
Dragos Sighi (2023-07-29 19:08:12+00:00): yes , I wanted to write the address
I changed the tag
thank you very much for pointing it out
asatoku (2023-07-30 09:49:16+00:00): This is just a village
user_14538650 (2023-07-30 11:39:15+00:00): ok
syntex (2024-02-27 22:43:09+00:00): akurat w tym przypadku pojedyncza linia nie była poprawna : ) jest rozgradzający pas zieleni pomiędzy chodnikiem i ścieżką rowerową
Rogoyski (2024-02-28 20:01:14+00:00): Jeśli mówimy o przejeździe/przejściu na wysokości Hirszfelda, to nie zmieniłem tej ścieżki pod tym kątem, poprawiałem tylko geometrię i wydzieliłem "crossing". Ale spoko :)
mariotomo (2023-07-31 07:25:51+00:00): hi. thanks for your contribution. just to confirm: are you sure of the location of this amenity? you mapped it inside the ministry of education (at least this is what's mapped)? also the address looks weird, for there's no Avenida Central in the neighbourhood. can you possibly provide the name of the restaurant?
Crsi (2023-07-29 00:53:48+00:00): Hello Néhémie and welcome to OSM.

It looks like you have added some historic city walls. However, it looks like some of them are not still standing, i.e. are ruins, from satellite images. If that is the case, please don't use barrier=city_wall for them, which would imply an actual, existing impassable city wall. Use historic=citywalls instead.
There are parts of wall structures to the east which do look like they qualify to get this tag, though.

Thank you very much,
Crsi
mavl (2024-11-13 10:14:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159083843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible sources - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16857].
impiaaa (2023-07-28 19:38:17+00:00): Please use the changeset comment field to describe what each change does and why. For example, "Remove a building part because it no longer exists." See this page for more examples: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Brian@Brea (2023-07-28 21:02:07+00:00): I don’t why Portlach does it but it divides my changes into multiple change sets every time I save. This set was apart of Changeset 139147382.
eggie (2023-07-29 12:38:38+00:00): Dag Joel,

Je komt in ieder geval goed uit.

We hebben ook nog tagging voor ingang
entrance=yes
entrance=main
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:entrance%3Dmain

MVG
eggie
Doaeol (2023-07-30 11:44:00+00:00): Dank!
felipeeugenio (2024-07-28 15:08:30+00:00): Hola Vicente. además del letrero de velocidad máxima hay que agregar el maxspeed= a la calle misma. Me he encontrado varios casos en que está solo el cartel.
Y otros en donde el cartel es distinto al valor que tiene la calle.

El cartel es solo para que después facilitar el encontrar la evidencia en caso de que la velocidad máxima esté cuestionada.

saludos
VicenteBarraFM (2024-07-29 23:57:56+00:00): Hola. Recién leo esto. Gracias por el consejo. Normalmente solo mapeo el nodo de límite de velocidad, debido a que en algunos casos como calles largas, la velocidad puede ir variando dependiendo del tramo de estas, entonces en ese caso habría que dividir la vía según los limites de velocidad para agregarlo a la vía misma. En conclusión, sólo he agregado los nodos de "limite de velocidad" ya que son de los que estoy seguro y/o he visto presencialmente, pero si supiese si la velocidad es constante en una vía, lo dejaré agregado también en esta. Saludos.