piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Gregory Peony (2024-07-24 03:22:56+00:00): WAY: 555942026 & WAY: 1302054689 should have been modified and not deleted. The deletion of WAY: 1302054689 almost resulted in a disconnection in the highway network between the east and west sides of this village. I think that the safest bet would have been make WAY: 1302054689 an intermittent river and then fords could be mapped across it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154175273
Gregory Peony (2024-07-24 05:21:25+00:00): I undeleted ways and intergrated them into the map.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154175273
NorthCrab_upload (2024-07-20 11:50:27+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7824348849

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
jeslop (2024-07-26 16:01:32+00:00): Saludos Tetutito. ¿Cuál es la fuente para el nombre de ese camino?

Saludos,

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
Gregory Peony (2024-07-24 05:26:23+00:00): I recommend using fast draw for the residential areas.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154175676
Gregory Peony (2024-07-22 04:40:59+00:00): You should not have deleted WAY: 555932000, especially since you simply replaced a part of it with WAY: 1302677315. In doing so you made the history and metadata of the original element significanlty more difficult to track, and they will likely be lost, unless someone with the required skills retrevies them. Instead you should have split the highway into segments, and retained the history on the segment you wished to keep, given that you replaced the highway with one of the same classification as the first version of the original.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154175772
Co Meijer (2024-07-22 07:44:56+00:00): I think you are right with your comments. Deleting pathes was not correct!
The goal of this project is to detect tracks where 4wheel drive cars might be able to drive. This I took to literary, sorry for this!
Are the deleted issues back on the OSM map again? Can I support on this? I must find out how to do that, can changesets be inverted
Thanks for your comments, best regards, Co Meijer, Netherlands.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154175772
Co Meijer (2024-07-22 07:45:25+00:00): I think you are right with your comments. Deleting pathes was not correct!
The goal of this project is to detect tracks where 4wheel drive cars might be able to drive. This I took to literary, sorry for this!
Are the deleted issues back on the OSM map again? Can I support on this? I must find out how to do that, can changesets be inverted
Thanks for your comments, best regards, Co Meijer, Netherlands.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154175772
Co Meijer (2024-07-22 07:45:27+00:00): I think you are right with your comments. Deleting paths was not correct!
The goal of this project is to detect tracks where 4wheel drive cars might be able to drive. This I took to literary, sorry for this!
Are the deleted issues back on the OSM map again? Can I support on this? I must find out how to do that, can changesets be inverted
Thanks for your comments, best regards, Co Meijer, Netherlands.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154175772
Co Meijer (2024-07-22 07:45:29+00:00): I think you are right with your comments. Deleting paths was not correct!
The goal of this project is to detect tracks where 4wheel drive cars might be able to drive. This I took to literary, sorry for this!
Are the deleted issues back on the OSM map again? Can I support on this? I must find out how to do that, can changesets be inverted
Thanks for your comments, best regards, Co Meijer, Netherlands.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154175772
Gregory Peony (2024-07-23 04:03:10+00:00): I accept your apology ;) You're welcome for the comments. I have not rectified these problems, hence the "Unresolved" tag. I think that the best way to fix the problem in this situation is to use the undelete plugin, because there is only one way that was deleted, and I've already modified some of the ways which were also modified in this changeset.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154175772
Gregory Peony (2024-07-23 21:29:39+00:00): I resolved the problem by undeleting the highway and conecting it with the network while aligning to imagery and making modifications. You can see this by checking its history after clicking on the element.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154175772
moonraver (2024-08-18 13:38:29+00:00): zdravim,ste si isty,ze ten bufet a wc ktore sa zmazali tam uz na buduci rok,resp. este tento rok cez sezonu nebudu? Isiel som minuly tyzden okolo a naozaj tam neboli, ale neviem, ci by som ich mazol uz nadobro. Chodim casto okolo a sledujem to cely rok.  Este by som pockal,podla mna tam urcite bude este nejaky bufet minimalne,kazdy rok tam bol.Dam tam predponu zivotneho cyklu "was:" a uvidime, ci tam nahodou este nebude znova stat.
Probertp (2024-11-12 16:24:42+00:00): Dobrý deň, samozrejme, ak viete použiť vhodnejšie tagy, som za. Tiež tadiaľ jazdím, no ani v priebehu 3 mesiacov tam nevznikol žiaden nový bufet a tento stav vyzerá byť konečný. Prípadný nový bufet na tomto mieste by som samozrejme zaznačil sem do OSM.

S pozdravom
OpenDataFreak (2024-11-12 11:25:48+00:00): Vielleicht ist es mein Unverständnis, aber was genau ist der "Mörderwald"? Mir scheint es, als sei der Name für die Postleitzahl 02763 jetzt als Mörderwald eingetragen... Sollte das nicht "Zittau" sein?
Norbert Dichter (2024-07-20 12:17:23+00:00): Re: Task 232859485

found nearby an older point for village named Misesa B 
while I added
Misesa Quarry A place village source MSFsurvey source:date 2024 is_in:district Blantyre
02:06 PM, July 20, 2024
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154176282
NorthCrab_upload (2024-07-20 12:20:42+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Kusocińskiego":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12064648489

"Leszczynowa":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12064648509
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12064648510
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12064648511
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12064648512
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12064648513
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12064648514

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
marc__marc (2024-09-07 00:47:23+00:00): Bonjour,
vous avez mis le tag surface sur plein de noeud, par ex https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1125416632
Cordialement,
Marc
Jacopo (2024-11-26 13:43:47+00:00): Ciao
mi pare che il tag "bridge" si sia propagato per tutta la way, riesci a limitarlo solo al punto dove si trova effettivamente il ponte?
Grazie ciao
Jacopo
eggie (2024-07-20 19:14:09+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
In de BGT omtrekgericht zie ik het pad als Melaniedreef benoemd?

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-07-20 19:28:21+00:00): Mira, Wanneer je van mening bent dat de BGT/Kadaster het fout heeft zet dan een opmerking op Verbeterdekaart Kadaster.
De Mariadreef is als straatnaam onbekend hier.
Ook adresnode 1 is hier aan Melaniedreef.
Graag reactie
MVG
eggie
divaddivag (2024-07-20 14:46:31+00:00): Bayeux va bientot ressembler au Molay: du coloriage mal fait, arbitraire et fantasmagorique bref une coquille vide qui a juste l'air joli. Vous êtes dépassé par ce que vous faites et surtout ce qu'est l'environnement OSM vous dépasse: un jouet pour passer le temps jusqu'à ce que vous en ayez marre, d'autres corrigerons peut-être le bazar, cela ne sera pas moi: trop trash. David
GerdP (2024-07-22 16:20:48+00:00): Moin aus Wildeshausen!
Zum Knotenpunktnetzwerk siehe auch https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/neues-knotenpunktnetzwerk-landkreis-diepholz/116071

Diesen Punkt https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1841929508 habe ich jetzt in das Netz eingefügt, war aber noch nicht selbst dort. Falls Du Lust hast, an den Details der Wegweiser mitzuarbeiten, siehe z.B.  diesen am nahegelegenen Knoten 13: https://www.osm.org/node/10675917973

ciao,
Gerd
gurglypipe (2024-07-20 18:53:59+00:00): Hi, are you sure the surface of Elderberry Drive is loose gravel? That would be unusual for a residential road, and it looks like asphalt from aerial imagery.
mike142sl (2024-07-20 19:46:36+00:00): Hi, 
Due to a dispute between the developer and the council, the road hasn't been tarmaced. It was a toss up between gravel and unpaved and I went with the former as there isn't an incomplete option. Hopefully it won't be long before the tarmac is added and this can be completed.
lakedistrict (2024-07-20 21:19:57+00:00): Hi, if it's a hardcore/sub-base sort of surface at present, the "compacted" option is probably a better fit. Fingers crossed the issues get resolved soon.
mike142sl (2024-07-20 22:08:58+00:00): Maybe, I'll change it tomorrow
gurglypipe (2024-07-21 08:47:43+00:00): Thanks. Looking at the latest aerial imagery, it looks like number 3 might actually be two semi-detached houses rather than one detached house; it looks like there’s a fence across the back garden. Is it semis?
mike142sl (2024-07-21 09:26:28+00:00): No they are one, the numbering is bonkers as well with number 3 between 1 and 2?
gurglypipe (2024-07-21 09:43:55+00:00): haha, I’m assuming the numbering is something to do with grouping odds and evens
gurglypipe (2024-07-22 21:39:52+00:00): For anyone reading this later, the change to surface=compacted was made in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154251177. Thanks!
mike142sl (2024-07-23 06:04:41+00:00): Yes, and if anyone becomes aware that the council has added the tarmac feel free to change the surface accordingly.
Warin61 (2024-07-21 01:02:07+00:00): Hi,
OSM multipolygon relation outer ways cannot share segments. 
I have deleted the relation and made a simple way with the tags .. see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1112469850
AU_SPM (2024-07-22 00:19:06+00:00): Thanks for that @Warin61, much appreciated.

Cheers,
AU_SPM
Gregory Peony (2024-07-21 04:48:17+00:00): The residential areas in this case should be joined especially becasuse they both have place=village nodes. The presence of the nodes means that they can be recognised as seperate settlements even though their sprawl has resulted in the once seperate residential areas becoming one (the residential area just north of WAY: 282589375 is not visible in this change-set). Aside pleas provide a comment with your change-set. I don't always get it right myself but here you are adding and modifying residential areas but you simply use the default project comment which only mentions highways.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154179277
Kraan46 (2024-07-21 05:00:00+00:00): Please invalidate and mention your comments in the TM so that someone else can do better. I will no longer be able to reply or work on this project.
Gregory Peony (2024-07-21 05:53:57+00:00): Sure thing. I left some comments on the tasks. Contributors can see these discussions if they open the task change-sets via the task data also.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154179277
Gregory Peony (2024-07-21 01:06:16+00:00): These two residential areas should be combined into one as per project instructions. The nearest buildings are 49 m away from one another. The southern residential area should also include the cluster of buildings to the West of it. I agree with the change of classification of WAY: 532907211 from service to unclassified as it connects settlements via the tertiary road to the East, though it should be more accurately digitized, becuase it currently crosses barriers and building footprints visible in aerial imagery.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154179355
Kraan46 (2024-07-21 04:31:04+00:00): Thank you for your input.
Gregory Peony (2024-07-21 03:56:11+00:00): WAY: 626485122 is in fact a dry river/stream look to the NE at various imageries to see the water body it is connected to. Look to the SW tertiary highway to see its similarity with the waterways which cross it. This is quite a flat area but using a topo map helps also. I have rectified its tagging. The highway connections are not correct. WAY: 532907218 going through the village to the SW does not represent a continuous highway and passes over several barriers. I recommend referencing other imagery sources e.g. mapbox in this case as highways may be easier to identify.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154179514
Kraan46 (2024-07-21 04:30:22+00:00): Thank you for your input.
Gregory Peony (2024-07-21 05:56:02+00:00): You're welcome.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154179514
mavl (2024-11-13 06:13:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 159076991, 159077113 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible sources - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16857].
YomanNH (2024-07-22 13:11:24+00:00): Edycja zawiera pełno błędów. Ciągi pieszo-rowerowe to highway=path. Kontrapas na ul. Wielopole był już prawidłowo zmapowany poprzez cycleway:left=opposite_lane. Nie ma tam osobnej drogi dla rowerów, żeby ją mapować jako osobną linię. Cały zestaw zmian wycofałem.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-06 17:17:18+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12064736954/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
Grégoire Seux (2025-05-06 17:38:13+00:00): fixed
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-06 17:56:17+00:00): is fixme:type still needed ?

(is it maybe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dcannabis ? or is it about different cbd? )
FajrAl (2024-07-20 14:08:15+00:00): Akan di-digitasi ulang
gscscnd (2024-07-20 18:55:43+00:00): Wodę tam widać? Ze dwa lata temu byłem i nie znalazłem.
irik (2024-07-20 20:13:34+00:00): Tak, woda jest, ale na pewno nie jest pitna. ;)
Hufkratzer (2024-07-20 20:41:28+00:00): Hi,
was du hier als "Reitanlagen" gemappt hast sind keine Reitanlagen (im Sinne von https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure=horse_riding).

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1302703190 ist eine Führanlage, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:animal=horse_walker

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1302703189 ist ein Reitplatz. Reitplätze werden in OSM normalerweise mit leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian getaggt.

Das Tag leisure=horse_riding gehört eher an https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/240326659 (Birkenhof).

Vgl.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a#Reitstall
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/248088377 (Beispiel)
http://www.birkenhof-urberach.de/reitanlage/
silversurfer83 (2024-07-22 19:26:09+00:00): Gude Spock :)

magst du hier aus deinen "building=roof" vielleicht überall ein "location=roof" machen? Oder ist das Absicht?

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154182320
ironspock (2024-07-23 16:52:05+00:00): Gude silversurfer83,

vielen Dank fuer den Hinweis. 
Es ist/war natuerlich keine Absicht, eher "unsauberes Arbeiten" oder nicht genaues Studieren der wirklichen Eigenschaften. Die Unterschiede sind nicht gross, aber fein.

Ich habe die Knoten aktualisiert...
... und sehe einiges an Arbeit auf mich zukommen...

Gruss ironspock
AntMadeira (2024-07-20 20:44:41+00:00): Olá, SilverKnight.
Vi que adicionaste o nome do estádio dr. Magalhães Pessoa, mas fizeste-o às bancadas e a um edifício.
O estádio já existe e engloba todo o conjunto de edifícios:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/177037520

Se puderes corrigir, agradeço.

Cumprimentos,
António Madeira.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154182761
SilverKnight (2024-07-21 20:19:52+00:00): Certo eu vou alterar, obrigado.
AntMadeira (2024-07-21 21:24:07+00:00): Obrigado.
GeoAndi (2024-07-20 15:03:13+00:00): Ich würde das entsprechend dieser Wikiseite taggen (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dkneipp_water_cure). Sieht dann z.B. so aus (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/60121105)
HAmap (2024-07-20 22:27:58+00:00): Du bist phänomenal exakt und sehr hilfreich - besten Dank!
GeoAndi (2024-07-21 09:03:00+00:00): Danke 👍 schaut gut aus.
mavl (2024-11-13 06:13:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 159076991, 159077113 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible sources - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16857].
Op'tRad (2025-12-17 12:35:40+00:00): Giertje,
Je had "Donderstenen" als vlak getekend. Misschien omdat je worstelde met een verbod op kruisende rails. Ik heb het nu als rollercoaster track en in 2 stukken 'geknipt' gemapt en simpelweg het hoogste deel met tag layer 1. Dan blijft een kruisingsverbod achterwege. Groet,
Werner
Giertje64 (2025-12-21 11:56:24+00:00): Hoi Werner,

Hoe en waarom ik dat destijds zo heb gedaan weet ik niet meer. Er was wel een tijdje een probleem met het weergeven van achtbaan-track waardoor die aan de voorkant onzichtbaar was, misschien vandaar.

Ik zie dat je de tracks van Rioolrat en Discovery Club ''symbolisch'' hebt ingetekend. Ik zal nog eens de tijd nemen die accuraat in te tekenen.
Op'tRad (2025-12-21 18:28:42+00:00): Hoi,
Ik ben inmiddels iets 'verder' en heb ook eens (alleen maar) gekeken hoe één en ander gemapt staat in Walibi - in ieder geval waren daar enkele dezelfde mappers bezig, maakt verder niet uit. Ik stel vast dat die attractieparken erg gecompliceerd zijn. Veel dingen zijn als tourism attraction + attraction en-of-ander gemapt, terwijl attraction geen subtag is van tourism. Maar laat je tourism weg dan rendert de naam van de attractie niet meer in OSM Carto ...  Ik wil eens even overleggen met Eggie. Want het in stukken knippen van tracks maakt het taggen  zeeer bewerkelijk. Ik zie dat er in Walibi vaak een vlak overheen wordt gezet, maar ik twijfel of dat wel OSM geoorloofd is. Voor tags aanhangen zou het wel veel eenvoudiger zijn! Misschien was dat vlak nog niet zo gek ... Tot later ...
user_20909876 (2024-07-20 15:30:06+00:00): Случайно запушил несколько изменений в один пакете правок, поэтому такое обширное описание
UT93 (2024-09-06 06:33:36+00:00): Grüsse.
Worin liegt denn der tiefere Sinn / deine Motivation, in diesem Änderungssatz, an hunderten von Gebäuden, dass Attribut "addr:country=CH" zu entfernen?
Piz Pachific (2024-09-06 18:46:02+00:00): Hi UT93. Da OSM eine Datenbank ist und man somit möglichst Redundanzen vermeiden möchte, macht der "addr:country=CH" m.E. nur nahe Grenze Sinn, wo evt. die Ungenauigkeit der Grenze zu falschen Ergebnissen führen würde. Alle anderen Objekte können ziemlich einfach mittels Grenze dem jeweiligen Land assoziert werden. Sehe deshalb absolut keinen Vorteil darin, diesen Tag an x-tausenden Objekten zu pflegen (hatte schon unzählbar viele Fehler darin korrigiert!). Oder hast du vielleicht ein reales Killer-Feature dieses Tags? Auch habe ich im Kopf, einmal auf einer Tagging-Mailingliste gelesen zu haben, dass dieser nur noch in Spezialfällen empfohlen wird, finde es aber leider nicht mehr.
UT93 (2024-09-06 20:02:27+00:00): Gut. Das Wiki sagt dazu zwar etwas leicht anderes. "Einige wenige ..."
Ich finde in diesem Fall: Nützt es nichts, so schadet es nicht. Irgendwer hat sich die Mühe gemacht, all diese Attribute zu erfassen, du machst dir die (vergebene?) Mühe, alles wieder zu löschen. Sieht fast ein wenig nach einem Änderungskrieg aus. Mir persönlich wäre die dafür benötigte Zeit zu schade, aber lass dich von mir nicht aufhalten, ich halte mich ab jetzt aus dieser Angelegenheit raus!
Piz Pachific (2024-09-06 20:44:01+00:00): Die allermeisten Adressen in dieser Gegend sind sowieso von mir vor Jahren in Kleinstarbeit eingetragen. Der Changeset 120788502, der die meisten addr.country nachgetragen hat, scheint sehr automatisiert zu sein. Eine solche Änderung hätte ich in wenigen Minuten. Aber was ich als letztes möchte, ist dein besagter Änderungskrieg. Ich bin gerne offen für gute Argumente für diesen Tag.
FajrAl (2024-07-20 15:57:29+00:00): Akan dilanjutkan
Svalbard (2024-07-20 15:31:17+00:00): RP der FF Oeversee-Frörup; Source: GPS
bdentremont (2024-07-20 18:40:41+00:00): RedCyberPandaz:
Welcome to OSM!  Your tags on these two objects look good, and this project often lacks on-the-ground input for rural areas.

I would suggest making this two separate edits in the future as it is easier for others to follow what you did.
FajrAl (2024-07-20 15:57:19+00:00): Akan dilanjutkan
DanielAgos (2024-07-20 16:17:20+00:00): fonte: Mapbox; ESRI satellite
aixbrick (2024-07-20 21:21:34+00:00): Hallo,
das sind keine "Nutzungsberechtigungen besser definiert.", sondern wildes Setzen von irgendwelchen Rechten, Tags oder Werten. Bitte beschäftige dich intensiv mit https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access sowie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Germany. Rückgängig gemacht mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154196408 (betrifft auch https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154186470).
Gruß
CurlingMan13 (2025-11-11 01:04:48+00:00): When adding street names, we don't use abbreviations.  "Wy" should be "Way"
eggie (2024-07-20 19:15:30+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-07-20 19:16:28+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-12 04:38:58+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164840069
NorthCrab_upload (2024-07-20 17:20:32+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Łokietka":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7223234594

"Pużaka":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8284950645

"T. Kościuszki":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8412449535

"Plac Spółdzielczy":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10573509447

"Hausbrandta":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11506360937

"KOSZALIŃSKA":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11627603924

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Dawid2849 (2024-08-13 14:59:43+00:00): Skasowałem playground:theme=playground. Ta bzdura proponowana przed iD nic nie wnosi, nic nie oznacza.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-07-20 18:00:25+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12064797940

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀