piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Vinber-Pro (2025-10-07 15:48:53+00:00): Bonjour,
tu as sorti building=yes de la plupart des arènes, hors je pense que la plupart des arênes sont des batiments qui servent d'arènes.

l'un n’empêche pas l'autre.

sport s'oriente plus vers bullfighting que vers course_landaise, les valeurs sont rarement en français.

j'ai l'impression que tu as également créé des doublons par rapport à des éléments existants, par exemple à Eugénie il existait cela https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/974102658 et tu as ajouté des attributs sur le terrain et par sur l'ensemble https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/935734598/history, transformant le terrain en arène ?

à discuter si besoin mais je pense qu'il y a plusieurs choses à reprendre dans ce changeset :)

à plus

Vincent
OT Aire Eugénie (2025-10-08 11:39:49+00:00): Bonjour, 
merci pour vous retour mais quelques difficultés avec les explications  ... Je viens de remodifier les arènes d'Eugénie, c'est bon ?
Vinber-Pro (2025-10-08 15:28:14+00:00): bonjour,
j'ai fait une passe sur toutes les arènes du groupe de modification. Il y a 2 "objets" différents :
- l'ensemble des arènes, avec les gradins et le terrain de sport
- le terrain de sport

dans le cas des arènes d'Eugénie :
- l'ensemble https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/974102658
- le terrain https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/935734598

l'ensemble c'est donc un leisure=stadium avec sport=bullfighting

le terrain leisure=pitch avec sport=bullfighting

pour sport=course_landaise, peut-être que je me trompe car le terme semble être utilisé pour d'autres cadres que les landes https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Course_landaise

à creuser
Jordi MF (2025-10-03 15:52:00+00:00): Como ya se explicó en este changeset (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172292329), no es correcto añadir el nombre de la empresa en la etiqueta "name".
eggie (2025-10-02 15:31:32+00:00): Kijk eens in de wiki hoe een playground te mappen.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Tag:leisure%3Dplayground

Let op  Alle tagging is UK English.
eggie (2025-10-02 15:52:39+00:00): Beste Rien,

Dit zijn zaken die niet in OSM horen.
De description heb ik verwijderd. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-10-02 15:53:45+00:00): Ik zie dat je nooit een welkomstmail hebt ontvangen.. bij deze Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-10-02 15:27:58+00:00): Besste Peereke,

Probeer je eerst een beetje in te lezen voordat je in hoog tempo van  alles toevoegt wat in je opkomt.
Ik heb het weer aangepast. Niet name= gebruiken. Kijk bij access wat daar bijhoort in de wiki.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-10-02 21:27:46+00:00): Dag Servé, De route heb ik omgelegd.

Let wel op dat je geen paden vastmaakt aan de landuse.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-10-02 21:31:38+00:00): https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#?map=18.0/51.8102/5.2475
ilias_ (2025-10-02 16:47:44+00:00): ?? what is this road
Gregory Peony (2025-10-04 01:16:10+00:00): where possible please modify existing features instead of deleting and remapping. On this occasion there's not really any harm done since the existing one didn't have much history. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172754843
vng_me (2025-10-03 02:20:25+00:00): Coastlines are broken after this changeset.
mona_magdy (2025-10-05 12:51:06+00:00): Hello, mkarau;
I want to thank you for your contribution to improving OSM maps.
I noticed that you placed a block at the end of a road and another on a road under construction (n13114224746, n13179773957).
I wanted to clarify that we are making these changes according to the rules stated on the website OSM Wiki.
Regarding my specific case of placing a barrier at the end of an intersection, according to the OSM Wiki website (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:barrier), it is incorrect, as a barrier is not placed at the end of a road or at an intersection of two roads. As for the case of placing a barrier on a road under construction, it is meaningless because the road is under construction and therefore inoperable; placing the barrier does not add anything new.
We also make these changes based on recent satellite images and include their dates in the source.
We have no problem making any changes based on local knowledge or survey, but we make modifications that are consistent with OSM policy.
Regards
mona_magdy
mkarau (2025-10-06 09:09:00+00:00): Hi Mona.

I appreciate your comment. As some points in time of road development in the UAE, there are moments when some of the OSM conventions don't fully capture what is happening. Unfortunately, the on-the-ground reality is that there is a road that used to be connected, that is no longer connected, and now has blockades at the end of it. My role as an editor who lives in this area is to most accurately represent physical reality for the sake of the usefulness of the map. At this moment, the construction of roads in the UAE is "out of compliance" with OSM standards. It will be updated once a final road plan is revealed and constructed.

I would re-iterate, that it's really not advisable to remotely edit roads of the UAE using only satellite imagery and outdated GPS tracks, as things change here on a weekly basis. Updating names to have proper Arabic naming is a great effort, but I would caution against editing the physical layout of roads in this region without someone local who can verify.
mona_magdy (2025-10-06 13:00:10+00:00): Hello, mkarau;
Thank you for contacting us.
I wanted to clarify that we have contacted you and have not made any changes to your modifications to benefit from your insights as someone living in the UAE. However, it is possible to remove barriers from the end of the streets, as, based on what you said, the road is no longer connected, until we reach the optimal way to represent reality and improve Open Street Map maps in the UAE.
Regards
mona_magdy
NeisBot (2025-10-02 15:56:54+00:00): Hi Gunner101@, welcome and thanks for your contribution!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

Based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Adjusted existing features"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
citrula (2025-10-03 01:19:52+00:00): You dragged a sidewalk in this edit, please be careful.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-02 16:10:58+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13188963627

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
ika-chan! (2025-10-03 05:32:02+00:00): We do not abbreviate street names. Please see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Abbreviations

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172772666
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2025-10-03 12:45:13+00:00): Vandalizm amaçlı değişiklikler geri alınmıştır.(changeset/172756316, changeset/172756782, changeset/172757206, changeset/172757219). Şahıs, yolların ve okulların adlarını gerçeğe aykırı şekilde değiştirmiş. (Örn: way/138304651'e ad olarak "abdullah öcalan sokak" yazmış.)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172789865
Kiss_Karoly (2025-10-02 18:33:14+00:00): Ma délután végigjártam mind a 4 problémás helyet, beszéltem ott emberekkel, és tényleg elég kaotikus a helyzet. Nemcsak a Lapszabászat van 409. szám alatt és a jelzett épület, hanem a tüzép is:
https://tinyurl.com/53439v2h
Kép: https://tinyurl.com/59pxd5v9
Senki nem tudja miért van így.
Nagyon megtévesztő.
Kiss_Karoly (2025-10-02 18:53:35+00:00): Igen. A terepen is így van. Korrekt a jelölés. Eddig a pontig: https://tinyurl.com/2uv763dp az egyik oldal a Vasút sor, a másik oldal a Szentendrei út. Akkor válik el élesen a kettő, amikor a HÉV elmetszi a Vasút sort / Szentendrei utat. Onnan a HÉV egyik oldalán halad a Vasút sor, a másik oldalán a Szentendrei út. Tanulságos volt nekem, mert nem ismertem ezt a name:left, name:right cimkét.
infeeeee (2025-10-02 19:06:51+00:00): Ilyenkor kérdéses, hogy meg kell-e ismételni mindkét nevet a fő name kulcsban, én nem ismételném meg, oldják meg ezt a renderelők, de az összes validátor kiakadna, hogy hogy lehet, hogy egy utcának nincs neve.

Amúgy utcatáblákon csak a Vasút sort látom mapillaryn, csak az egyik végén: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1957533448415692

Felviszed a tüzép adatait?
Kiss_Karoly (2025-10-02 19:16:34+00:00): Igen.
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2025-10-03 12:45:14+00:00): Vandalizm amaçlı değişiklikler geri alınmıştır.(changeset/172756316, changeset/172756782, changeset/172757206, changeset/172757219). Şahıs, yolların ve okulların adlarını gerçeğe aykırı şekilde değiştirmiş. (Örn: way/138304651'e ad olarak "abdullah öcalan sokak" yazmış.)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172789865
Eren00 (2025-10-02 18:47:18+00:00): Merhabalar. Öncelikle OpenStreetMap'e yapmış olduğunuz katkılar için teşekkür ederiz, Lakin yaptığınız değişiklik kaynak içermiyor ve isimlendirdiğiniz yerlerin hepsini aynı olacak şekilde isimlendirmişsiniz. Eğerki isimlendirdiğiniz isim sizin gerçek hayattaki adınız ise lütfen OpenStreetMap'e kişisel bilgi girmeyin. Burası herkese açık bir platform. Eğerki bir sorunuz olursa bana https://osm.org/user/Eren0 hesabım üzerinden mesaj atarak iletişime geçebilirsiniz. Değişikliğiniz, aşağıda bulunan changeset bağlantısında geriye alınmıştır:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172762048
Eren00 (2025-10-02 18:45:15+00:00): Merhabalar. Öncelikle OpenStreetMap'e yapmış olduğunuz katkılar için teşekkür ederiz lakin yaptığınız değişiklik kaynak içermiyor ve isimlendirdiğiniz yerlerin hepsi aynı isimlendirmişsiniz. Eğerki isimlendirdiğiniz isim sizin gerçek hayattaki adınız ise lütfen OpenStreetMap'e kişisel bilgi girmeyin. Burası herkese açık bir platform. Eğerki bir sorunuz olursa bana https://osm.org/user/Eren0 hesabım üzerinden mesaj atarak iletişime geçebilirsiniz. Değişikliğiniz, aşağıda bulunan changeset bağlantısında geriye alınmıştır:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172761969
Eren00 (2025-10-02 18:45:02+00:00): Merhabalar. Öncelikle OpenStreetMap'e yapmış olduğunuz katkılar için teşekkür ederiz lakin yaptığınız değişiklik kaynak içermiyor ve isimlendirdiğiniz yerlerin hepsi aynı isimlendirmişsiniz. Eğerki isimlendirdiğiniz isim sizin gerçek hayattaki adınız ise lütfen OpenStreetMap'e kişisel bilgi girmeyin. Burası herkese açık bir platform. Eğerki bir sorunuz olursa bana https://osm.org/user/Eren0 hesabım üzerinden mesaj atarak iletişime geçebilirsiniz. Değişikliğiniz, aşağıda bulunan changeset bağlantısında geriye alınmıştır:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172761962
YomanNH (2025-10-20 18:08:05+00:00): - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
- nie twórz fikcji
- zestaw zmian wycofany, tej fikcji nie ma już na mapie
Ed_slv (2025-10-03 13:43:16+00:00): Boas
A Barragem do Vale do Gaio é uma barragem em aterro, de terra com enrocamento, não é uma barragen em pedra/rocha. Todas as grandes barragens em terra tem enrocamento para as proteger da erosão das ondas a montante ou da chuva a jusante
dmfr (2025-10-28 11:23:15+00:00): Proponho portanto material=soil + surface=stone, que achas?
Ed_slv (2025-10-30 15:50:05+00:00): Excelente proposta
Dawid2849 (2025-10-02 21:19:41+00:00): Teraz jest zduplikowana nazwa w name i alt_name na Szosie Połczyńskiej
Dawid2849 (2025-10-03 10:23:19+00:00): Oraz czy nazwa "Szosa Połczyńska" nie powinna być aż do tego miejsca https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3794148261 ?
Udarian (2025-10-02 17:25:22+00:00): based on the aerial imagery in the area the bare rock looks more like a Stone groyne to me, is that correct? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dgroyne . I ask because I have seen similar structures mapped as groins before in Miami Dade County.
J00SECI (2025-10-15 20:01:13+00:00): Hola, creo que los carriles marginales de la Pista Heroes de la Insurreción deben de recategorizarse como vía primaria al igual que los carriles centrales y los segmento oeste de los marginales, debido a que no son vías independientes, sino que se consideran carriles integrantes de la Pista
eggie (2025-10-02 21:20:44+00:00): Hoi,

Dit zal vast niet de vorm van het parcours zijn.
Het lijkt me beter even te wachten en dan de vorm van het parcours in te tekenen.
Situatie september
https://viewer.satellietdataportaal.nl/@51.49926,5.387732,18/?datastrip=20250908_PNEO-03

Mapse,
eggie
AndyB_66 (2025-10-02 18:52:04+00:00): Please follow the OSM rules: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Dobr%C3%A9_koment%C3%A1%C5%99e_sad_zm%C4%9Bn
mweper (2025-10-02 23:51:19+00:00): Hola Paola. Gracias por contribuir al mapa. 

Te comento que vi varios errores de etiquetado y alineación en tus ediciones y tuve el atrevimiento de corregirlos un poco. p.e. No se debe usar mayúsculas en toda la palabra, solo mapear 1 categoría por elemento, mapear cada edificio por separado y solo en donde este el edificio, etc..

Puedes ver mis cambios aquí: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172768758

Cualquier duda que tengas al respecto, estaré para ayudarte. 
Saludos.
Bastian Greshake Tzovaras (2025-10-03 18:17:34+00:00): Merci!
mweper (2025-10-03 00:20:39+00:00): Hola. ¿Que es lo que quieres marcar aquí?. Se debe añadir al menos una categoría correspondiente para mapearlo correctamente.
Recuerda no usar la base principal de OSM para proyectos privados o internos, ya que para esto existe https://umap.osmfr.org/ entre otros tantos proyectos.

Cualquier consulta al respecto, estoy para ayudarte en lo posible. Saludos.
Natfoot (2026-01-18 19:46:31+00:00): do these noexits have buffer stops on them? railway=buffer_stop
k-r-o (2025-10-02 17:47:12+00:00): NB: this is the definitive setup, not just a temporary roadworks-related restriction.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-24 16:38:12+00:00): reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410  and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969  remain not answered

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173726713
Eren00 (2025-10-02 18:44:52+00:00): Merhabalar. Öncelikle OpenStreetMap'e yapmış olduğunuz katkılar için teşekkür ederiz lakin yaptığınız değişiklik kaynak içermiyor ve isimlendirdiğiniz yerlerin hepsi aynı isimlendirmişsiniz. Eğerki isimlendirdiğiniz isim sizin gerçek hayattaki adınız ise lütfen OpenStreetMap'e kişisel bilgi girmeyin. Burası herkese açık bir platform. Eğerki bir sorunuz olursa bana https://osm.org/user/Eren0 hesabım üzerinden mesaj atarak iletişime geçebilirsiniz. Değişikliğiniz, aşağıda bulunan changeset bağlantısında geriye alınmıştır:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172761958
NoctZan (2025-10-02 18:27:58+00:00): changeset comment was meant to be "added speed limit sign"
Hopla57 (2025-10-02 18:31:32+00:00): Source : la mairie
https://app.panneaupocket.com/ville/352855241-coincy-57530?panneau=2014256017
HantDX (2025-10-03 08:46:19+00:00): Добрый день. По какой причине убрали гидроним Дуполка неподалёку д. Кузьмичи?
HantDX (2025-10-07 08:48:59+00:00): Откатил удаление Дуполки. Как по мне, нет смысла удалять такие гидронимы, даже если эта река была мелиоризирована.
AndyB_66 (2025-10-02 18:49:59+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-02 18:40:56+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nieprawidłowa wartość addr:postcode.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/228006466

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Johnny Mapperseed (2025-10-02 18:53:23+00:00): Should note that I used OSIP imagery to reference the rough boundaries of where I think the construction site is between the features around it.
roozbehetech (2025-10-10 18:55:14+00:00): خدمات سیم پیچی الکتروموتور و ژنراتور
user_5359 (2025-10-03 07:39:21+00:00): You only added the name of a business to the node, but did not note that there is also a business there. No Website and comment isn't engouh.  If you do not know the spelling of the tag, please look it up in the wiki https://wiki.osm.org.
user_5359 (2025-10-03 07:39:49+00:00): You only added the name of a business to the building, but did not note that there is also a business there. No Website and comment isn't engouh.  If you do not know the spelling of the tag, please look it up in the wiki https://wiki.osm.org.
Jan Olieslagers (2026-04-29 08:38:09+00:00): Why tag this aerodrome as disused? If Wikipedia is to be believed, the airfield is operational.
Aethonatic (2026-05-04 12:07:16+00:00): The official Facebook page for the airport reported that it has indeed shutdown, what form of activity do you believe is still present here?
Jan Olieslagers (2026-05-04 12:11:56+00:00): check https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nottingham_(Tollerton)_Airport: "the airport continues to operate to rotary traffic."
The operators' website announces similarly.
Jan Olieslagers (2026-05-04 12:12:28+00:00): And by the way, how can a facebook page ever be "official"?
Aethonatic (2026-05-04 12:19:24+00:00): If it's operated by the company it represents.
Aethonatic (2026-05-04 12:20:03+00:00): I agree that I have been misinterpreting the situation on-ground somewhat, even if I didn't see any activity when I surveyed the area.
silversurfer83 (2025-10-03 07:18:06+00:00): Guten Morgen :)

kann es sein, dass die "name"n der Windräder eigentlich in "ref=" gehören?

Grüße aus dem Waldecker Land
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172762791
Nüsschen (2025-10-03 08:22:52+00:00): Moin Moin, 
wenn schon falsch, dann auch konsequent alle... ;)
Ich werd´s ändern!
Gruß aus dem Sauerland
Nüsschen
eggie (2025-10-02 21:09:10+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
maro21 (2025-10-03 14:05:32+00:00): Jakie jest źródło tych budynków?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1434925643
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1434925644
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1434925655
BorStated (2025-10-03 21:33:32+00:00): Racja, to działki. Przepraszam
BorStated (2025-10-04 19:33:56+00:00): Poprawiłem i sprawdziłem raz jeszcze -
skasowalem:
osm.org/way/1434925643 faktycznie błąd.
Za to:
osm.org/way/1434925644
osm.org/way/1434925655
widać, że na ortofoto są. Na geoportalu są jako działki, ale budynki fizycznie istnieją
NeisBot (2025-10-02 19:24:40+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-10-03 12:48:34+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/172789990
Mechowskyy (2025-10-02 19:27:30+00:00): poprawa przebiegu rzeki skrody
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-02 21:52:15+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8724887893
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1434930582

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-02 22:42:32+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8724887893
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1434930582

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
SomeoneElse (2025-11-09 14:32:58+00:00): Hello,
I think you accidentally added tracking information to the website - utm_source=local&utm_medium=organic&utm_campaign=oldbury .
pyspam (2026-01-15 22:09:41+00:00): Moin, kannst du etwas hierzu sagen? https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5125324
se7q38 (2026-01-16 16:48:02+00:00): Da stehen Wegweiser. Fahr hin und sieh nach.
pyspam (2026-01-16 19:18:19+00:00): Bin da heute vorbei gefahren und ist genau so ausgeschildert wie eingetragen :)
TrickyFoxy (2025-10-02 20:16:34+00:00): Спасибо. Ещё можно power=trasformer добавить
i2004 (2025-10-03 13:48:28+00:00): cuando hagas la 29  olivos y parque sarmiento  van x san telmo no hay ramal x paseo colon
Bondi Maps (2025-10-03 13:51:16+00:00): Eso estuve revisando, me parece raro que aparezca así en Moovit
MassCartog (2025-10-03 16:01:17+00:00): Hello, Welcome to OSM. In this changeset you removed some driveways. Those features were valid and mapped correctly.

Looks like you have a new account and might not be aware, on OSM If a feature actually exists on the ground should not be removed. Regardless if it's private or public, designated/informal/illegal/unauthorized. Please don't remove valid data from OpenStreetMap.

The correct way to handle this is to use the tagging system. access=private seems to apply here. Once this is done, services that do use OSM data will reflect that and specify their access.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won't_delete_roads_on_private_property
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-03-18 23:05:30+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13189415555/history has shop = hypermarket that was added in this edit
shop=hypermarket ? Why not shop=supermarket? Is there some difference? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=supermarket
foreigner037 (2025-10-07 06:12:02+00:00): Здравей,

след като добави общинските пътища добави ли ги към релацията за общински пътища в Ловеч?
fortera_au (2025-10-08 08:50:37+00:00): Hi ZLima12,

If there is a disagreement between two mappers on how to tag something, please do not continue to change the tag back and forth.

I'd recommend getting more of the local community involved through the community forums at https://community.openstreetmap.org, and come to a conclusion before you make any further changes like this.

Kind regards,  
Andrew Welch, OSMF Data Working Group
gurglypipe (2025-10-02 20:52:30+00:00): Hiya, what source are you using? In its previous location it was on the high point according to OpenTopoMap.
gb095666 (2025-10-02 21:15:31+00:00): Hi, I was up there on last Thursday with a group of walkers, and we specifically went to the spot previously identified, four of us all had various different GPS devices so it wasn't as though I had a dodgy gps signal, it was the same for all of us, all we could see at the point marked was a rough hollow in the ground, it wasnt even at the highest point, it looked nothing like a seat or anything really just a patch of moor with no real features, we also checked it with the OS map and everything points to a feature at the other side of the wall, if you look on the satellite view there is  big limestone rocky outcrop which could be described as a seat, so much so we all sat there and had our lunch, the cairn on top of the fell is already marked so I believe what is described on the OS map as Lord's seat is not the highest point but a limestone feature of the other side of the wall where I have marked.
gurglypipe (2025-10-20 21:31:57+00:00): OK, thanks for the explanation! :)
watmildon (2026-03-28 19:10:35+00:00): So good!! Nice work.