piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Joseph R P (2024-05-22 21:03:27+00:00): Hello, please do not create isolated trunk routes like this. Roads are not classified based on their size, but rather how they serve as a road in the area. Proper trunk routes are like US 29 and US 301 which link multiple cities and other major highways. Primary classification is best fit for this segment.
NeisBot (2024-05-18 04:30:07+00:00): Hi hampsto, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1284297179

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
WoodWoseWulf (2024-05-18 20:51:47+00:00): Hi hampsto,

This just looks like a pond on private property. Do you have any evidence there's a beach here?
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-21 17:25:23+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/151522306
literan (2024-05-18 10:01:20+00:00): точно was:amenity=marketplace? закрыт?
solenoid jam (2024-05-18 16:13:24+00:00): Оуч. Исправил
Vivek Dumre (2024-05-23 16:17:22+00:00): Good Mapping ,keep contributing .#OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151477604
Nusrat_Jahan_Nilima (2024-05-24 18:10:33+00:00): Thank you
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151477604
Hidoo00 (2024-08-27 20:28:41+00:00): Hi,
Why did you remove all the addresses from the offices?
osmviborg (2024-08-28 07:24:53+00:00): In DK, address information are imported by the bot AutoAWS [1]. This information is tagged on address nodes. The address nodes must not be modified. The address information must not be duplicated to other nodes or ways. This insures that addresses are always correct and up to date.
[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/AutoAWS
marczoutendijk (2024-12-07 15:56:49+00:00): Hola kapazao,
Veo que marcaste todas las ediciones inexactas de jamesks con un "fixme".
¿Supongo que la intención es eliminar el fixme una vez que se hayan hecho las correcciones ?
Saludos,
Marc.
kapazao (2024-12-08 09:53:36+00:00): Hola, así es. Este usuario junto a algunos otros que debería haber hecho lo mismo.
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=jamesks#values

Como estaba comprobado de que ninguna edición suya estaba bien hecha y no fallaba el que las geometrías fueran horribles, marqué todas sus ediciones en versión 1 con fixme para revisar.

Son miles que habrá que ir corrigiendo a lo largo de años por desgracia, pero es necesario que estén marcadas, puesto que no son ediciones aceptables para tener ocultas en el mapa.

Voy corrigiendo las que puedo y espero que más gente pueda ayudar con esto.

Un saludo
kapazao (2024-12-08 09:55:25+00:00): Preferiría que en estos casos directamente se eliminasen las ediciones, ya que no deberían permitirse y el tiempo que llevan corregirlas es mayor al de hacerlas nuevas. Cosa a parte el que tenemos miles de elementos incorrectos e imprecisos por todo el mapa.
Un saludo
pitfire (2024-05-18 11:45:54+00:00): Hallo mappy123,

bitte keine alteingesessenen Lokalitäten nur auf Grund eines Hinnweises von "anonym" total löschen.
Dafür gibt es den Lebenszyklus-Präfix disused:*=*, dass der POI vor Ort noch mit Atlinformationen erkennbar vorhanden ist. Er wird nur gerade nicht genutzt / steht leer.
Eine Wiederinbetriebnahme ist relativ leicht möglich und kann geplant sein. Dies gillt sowohl für die Infrastruktur (Aggertal-Hotel) als auch fürs Restaurant. 
VG pitfire
mappy123 (2024-05-19 11:49:23+00:00): Warum sollte ich einem user anonym weniger vertrauen also ich einem User pitfire (nichts gegen dich) oder du einem User mappy123? Die sind alle gleich anonym. Einen Account mit einer Schrottmailadresse anlegen dauert Sekunden. Was lifecycle angeht, wie oft im Leben ein zweischneidiges Schwert, hat alles vor und Nachteile. Habe auch schon gesehen dass die disused später nicht aufgeräumt wurde und man nicht wusste ob die neu eingetragene Pommesbude jetzt das disused ersetzt oder neben der Pommesbude immer noch ein leeres Geschäft ist. Frage ist da immer wo jemand seine persönliche Grenze zieht was Datenmüll ist. Es gibt Leute die mappen 3m Garageneinfahrt vor dem EFH als highway=service. Nicht falsch, für mich aber Datenmüll. Aber wie gesagt jeder zieht seine Grenze anders, wenn du die Knoten wieder herstellst und mit disused versiehst werde ich sicherlich keinen Mapping-War anfangen. Wie gesagt, meine Sichtweise. Frohes mappen noch und schönes langes Wochenende!
Kovoschiz (2024-05-18 07:26:30+00:00): 1. This is not `tunnel=yes` . `covered=` is already used. At most, we can debate whether it should be `=building_passage` , but there's no "building" left or right at ground level. Please don't edit for validators. 
2. You removed the `service=yard` ...
Azharul Islam Anik (2024-05-28 17:23:28+00:00): Thanks for your contribution. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151479803
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:14:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:18:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
Kovoschiz (2024-05-18 07:30:23+00:00): 1. This obviously doesn't reflect the depot area. Please see the other changeset.
2. Please don't delete then recreate the same points. You can detach the area.
heisenberganalogue (2024-05-19 08:36:41+00:00): Thanks.
Still, I can see some problem with the depot boundaries eg the station itself being included. The area below the southern half of Luk Yeung Galleria, Maxim's or the area in the water substation is also not part of the depot. Will try to amend later. :)
Kovoschiz (2024-05-19 09:53:50+00:00): `landuse=` in HK is effectively corresponding to the lot. The Luk Yeung  development can be considered part of the depot.  `landuse=` should be as simple as possible. You shouldn't split a `landuse=residential` for a mall and estate separately either.
heisenberganalogue (2024-05-19 12:10:05+00:00): Understood. Thanks for thr guidance again. Certainly corrected some of my concepts. Will see if any other places need further changes.
mtmail (2024-05-20 12:18:20+00:00): Do you know the address of this place? "n/a" is not helpful and I can't find it listed the website. Is this a business people can visit?
citrula (2024-05-18 09:09:26+00:00): You deleted a shop=storage_rental and shop=caravan when you made this edit, did you mean to do that?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151480491
MxxCon (2024-05-20 05:58:58+00:00): SEO spam reverted.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151561416
aTarom (2024-05-18 09:20:42+00:00): Hola, se han fusionado dos elementos diferentes en uno solo
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3289569580/history
a
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/948712920/history
por si no es accidental, se debe procurar mantener el "One_feature one_OSM_element"
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
te parece bien que restaure dicho elemento fusionado? si estoy equivocado en algo me lo dices sin problema por favor, o si lo prefieres, exponerlo el los canales de la comunidad, quedo a la espera
Saludos
user_430669 (2024-05-21 18:01:59+00:00): Hi, what does access=no + bicycle=yes mean? Is it just forbidden to motor vehicles?
saturnmimas (2024-05-21 19:18:39+00:00): I only changed tracktype, see https://osmhv.openstreetmap.de/changeset.jsp?id=151480983

That said, I don't know why it was marked access=no before; it has no gates but I didn't look carefully for a "private road" sign (just passed by train).
user_430669 (2024-05-22 06:08:04+00:00): Ah, sorry.
I am planning on cycling there at some point, I will update the tags then.
saturnmimas (2024-05-22 06:17:10+00:00): Nice fschhh, you're doing a great favour for the rest of us, mapping while out in the field.
h0rr0rrdrag0n (2024-05-18 16:17:31+00:00): В этом пакете правок были удалены существующие пешеходные дорожки рядом с домом 4к3 по Лыжному переулку!
Удалённые пути, которые тем не менее существуют на реальной местности: WAY: 932883997, WAY: 932883996 и WAY: 932883998.
h0rr0rrdrag0n (2024-05-18 16:21:38+00:00): I found, what pavements around house # 4к3 on the Лыжный переулок was deleted. But in reality this pavements still exists.
Need to check all changes here.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151481335
mini-me (2024-05-18 17:22:10+00:00): Придомовые дорожки нужно соединять со всеми возможными путями, либо вовсе не рисовать. Иначе вы просто ломаете навигацию.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/922923793
Вот для чего это? Под рендер?
h0rr0rrdrag0n (2024-05-18 20:32:49+00:00): Поправил дорожку, спасибо за замечание)
mini-me (2024-05-18 20:50:53+00:00): Есть вот такой тег https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sidewalk
Если тротуар ничем не отделён от дороги, то вполне можно обойтись им
eggie (2024-05-18 08:32:58+00:00): Dag emmaknijn

Je vraagt feedback  Volgens mij is het oke zo.. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:departures_board

Kijk wel uit met schuiven met de kaart in editmodus. Houd je editgebied kleiner.
MVG
egge
Filip009 (2024-05-18 17:52:06+00:00): Prečo si to revertol? Teraz nechápem, či to chceš odstrániť, alebo ponechať.
mapperue (2024-05-18 18:09:56+00:00): Je to vrátená sada zmien po žiadosti.
Filip009 (2024-05-18 18:23:30+00:00): Okej, vďaka za vysvetlenie. Len ma ešte zaujíma či je tá žiadosť od alfred476, alebo od niekoho iného.
VA00 (2024-06-11 18:11:35+00:00): Zauważyłem, że dokonałeś w ostatnim miesiącu szeregu absurdalnych zamian track->unclassified na drogach, które przynajmniej dziś były nieprzejezdne dla niczego poza ciężkim traktorem i do żadnego innego celu niż rolnicze nie są i raczej nie będą używane. Przykład: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/321320028
Hufkratzer (2024-05-18 22:14:28+00:00): Hallo mal wieder,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1284343708 sieht auch aus wie ein Reitplatz und nicht wie eine Reitanlage, vgl. alte Diskussion https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128845661
eggie (2024-05-18 09:07:40+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback No advertising

The description should only include neutral and factual information about the object. It should not include subjective evaluations, e.g. "the best restaurant in town", "modern, comfortable hotel, in the heart of the city". Do not use description=* for advertising messages. They will be removed as spam and may also have further consequences for your OSM account. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description

description verwijderd en info samengevoegd met adresnode. Format postcode hersteld. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-05-18 09:10:36+00:00): Tp.. Geen spatie in postcodes svp.
Wanneer Kooij Tweewielers hier niet meer zit kan alle bedrijfsinfo van de adresnode. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-05-18 09:12:08+00:00): De bedrijfsinfo heb ik verwijderd. Postcode hersteld.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-05-18 09:14:18+00:00): Svp geen adresnoxde verwijderen. Het bedrijf staat nu op de straat?
OPAGO PAY old (2024-05-18 09:16:53+00:00): Its an FoodTruck, there is a Market on the Street
eggie (2024-05-18 09:18:12+00:00): Yes.. I know... I restored addressnode 271.
Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2024-05-18 09:30:01+00:00): You are sure this foodtruck has an official address equel to pne of the buildings?
aTarom (2024-05-18 13:40:51+00:00): Muestra las fotos en
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/usuarios-editando-en-espana-bajo-sospecha-vandalismo-malas-practicas-y-otros/2510
por favor
acordemos las ediciones, colaboremos para impedir las guerras de ediciones...
en este historial se te ha invitado en varias ocasiones a participar en el debate
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/44423519/history
Davileci (2024-05-18 17:59:58+00:00): https://www.aguaviva.es/2021/02/20/aguaviva-completa-la-rotulacion-bilingue-en-las-calles-de-la-localidad/
melody_Tej (2024-07-02 08:59:23+00:00): Hi POOJAGAWARI, there is no connectivity for the truck, I checked in all sources and we have the Mapillary in that area so I have removed the connectivity and fixed the task.
MyoKyawKyaw (2024-05-29 11:20:34+00:00): Thank you for your contribution in mapping. This aquaculture ponds mapping look great and also the clear changeset comment. Keep Contributing, Cheers!!!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151484426
sanch3z (2024-05-20 14:38:14+00:00): Hallo xrefz,

meines Erachtens sollte die Linksabbieger-Spur der Äußeren Nürnberger Straße nicht als separater Weg eingezeichnet werden, da keine bauliche Trennung der einzelnen Spuren vorhanden ist.
xrefz (2024-05-21 16:50:40+00:00): Hallo sanch3z,

schau doch mal hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151638120

Besser so?
sanch3z (2024-05-21 18:34:25+00:00): Das betrifft nich nur die genannte Linksabbiegerspur, sondern auch die (Rechts-)Abbiegespuren der Kreuzung  Willy-Brandt-Allee/Franz-Josef-Strauß-Straße sowie die Abzweigung der Franz-Josef-Strauß-Straße richtung Aral-Tankstelle.

Eine Abzweigung einer Straße sollte erst erfolgen sobald eine bauliche Trennung (z.B. eine Leitplanke oder Verkehrsinsel) vorliegt. Spuren, die lediglich mit Linien markiert sind, sollten mit https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:turn:lanes kartiert werden. 

Siehe auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Fahrspuren
felipeeugenio (2024-05-19 00:55:31+00:00): Hola. El nombre de la calle va en addr:street y el número en addr:housenumber.

y por favor cuidar la ortografía y no usar contracciones.
Vivek Dumre (2024-05-25 11:33:58+00:00): Good and accurate mapping.#OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151485252
julcnx (2024-07-30 10:27:51+00:00): Thanks for your contributions! I see that you frequently use `highway=road`, which is often used for ways that haven’t been surveyed yet. However, I noticed that you’ve also added tags like width, smoothness, and surface. Are you unsure about the appropriate classification to use? In cases where the roads provide access to residences, `highway=residential` might be a better fit.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151485337
BCNorwich (2024-05-18 14:42:38+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've drawn the building and added the address as per OSM practice. Please check the address to make sure it's correct.

Regards Bernard.
ZekOwney (2024-05-18 19:50:05+00:00): Merci pour le complément :)
divaddivag (2024-05-19 05:05:05+00:00): La clé subject:wikidata est pratique pour lier les POIs qui partagent le même thème et elle est exploitée par l'application mapy.cz ce qui rend la carte interactive quand tu te ballades. Idem, du coté d'OpensStreetBrowser: https://www.openstreetbrowser.org/#map=14/49.2538/-0.2638&basemap=osm-mapnik&categories=memorial . Si cela t'intéresse je peux te briefer sur la façon dont j'ai approché le mapping des mémoriaux et y'en a un paquet!
highflyer74 (2024-06-13 08:11:50+00:00): Hallo!

Danke für Deinen Beitrag! Bitte beachte, dass Namen in OSM nur für Objekte vergeben werden, die auch wirklich einen Namen haben. Beispielsweise hat eine Bank nicht den Namen "Sitzbank". Dass es sich um eine Bank handelt, ist bereit durch das entsprechende Attribut (in OSM Tag genannt) klar.

Danke, dass Du bei weiteren Bearbeitungen daran denkst :-)

Viele Grüße!
eggie (2024-05-18 11:59:23+00:00): Dag FedGorilla... Beter source=BAG laten staan.  Ik heb het hersteld.
Dan dus source=BAG;local_knowledge

Gr eggie
FedGorilla (2024-05-21 14:15:51+00:00): Hi Eggie, Thanks! Wat is BAG? Ik vermoedde iets zoals "Basisadministratie Gemeente", maar wilde niet de indruk wekken dat ik die had gecontroleerd.
eggie (2024-05-21 14:37:19+00:00): https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/?zoomlevel=1

Zie hier.. zeg maar de administratie van het kadaster.
Dat is de bron van de adresnode en het gebouw.
FedGorilla (2024-05-21 15:48:32+00:00): Dankjewel. En omdat het adres en gebouw niet zijn veranderd, kon ik source=BAG laten staan zonder het opnieuw te controleren. Ik snap het.
s777n (2024-05-18 11:41:06+00:00): так заросла что там сейчас даже пешком не пройти?
tatik (2024-06-12 11:11:50+00:00): да, тропа превратилась в болото местами с колеей по бедро, это не дорога.
felipeeugenio (2024-05-19 00:51:07+00:00): Hola Diego, por favor pedir que te instruyen de donde te están pidiendo agregar estas cosas sobre como agregar una dirección; en addr:street se agrega la calle en la que queda el recinto, no una descripción de como llegar.

Además por favor cuidar la ortografía.
HellMap (2024-05-19 15:29:54+00:00): Sveiki!

Ja uz ceļa ir zīmes, kas aizliedz pārvietošanos nepiederošiem, tad teorētiski to ceļu vajadzētu atzīmēt kā `access=private`, jo tā ir atļautā/legālā lietošana. Pēc kadastra robežām tas izskatās pēc (servitūda) ceļa gar vairākiem īpašumiem.

Es redzu, ka te ir velomaršruts. Vai tur kaut kādas zīmes par to ir?

Fizisko barjeru var norādīt piemēram ar `barrier=block` un paša ceļa.

`advertising=board` arī nevajadzētu izmantot šādai piezīmei - to lieto priekš publiskiem "dēļiem", kur ir izvietota visāda (reklāmas) informācija.
ArmandsR (2024-05-19 15:40:51+00:00): Atbildēju e-pastā ar pievienotiem fotoattēliem.
ArmandsR (2024-05-19 15:43:55+00:00): Sapratu, ka e-pastā neaiziet. Nepaskatījos, ka ir "no replay". Te būs saite uz bildēm:
https://photos.app.goo.gl/VdcedxjAZaqGct5i7
HellMap (2024-05-19 15:52:20+00:00): Skaidrs, paldies par precizējumu. Es pārlikšu tegus/vērtības uz to, kā parasti tādas vietas apzīmē.

Vai tā smilšu čupa/izrakums tomēr nav pa virsu pašam ceļam? Vai arī tas ceļš tiešām aiziet garām sānos? Pēc bildes izskatās, ka tur jālec pāri.

Par velomaršruta problēmu gan jāraksta uz Domi...
ArmandsR (2024-05-19 15:59:00+00:00): Jālec/jārāpjas pāri. Tā tranšeja ir perpendikulāri pārrakta visa ceļa platumā. Čupa tā arī atstāta uz ceļa kā papildus barjera grāvim faktiski.
Nu tā pa brutālo tur izdarīts ir.
Kādu apzīmējumu vispār tāda veida zīmēm par privātīpašumu utt. kas nav oficiālās ceļa zīmes labāk izmantot? Es tur ātrumā neatradu neko piemērotu. Skaidrs jau, ka reklāmas dēlis tas nav...
ArmandsR (2024-05-19 16:00:45+00:00): Ceļš nesakrīt ar iezīmēto ceļa līniju, ja kas. Tos es nepalaboju pieteikumā. Ja vari, pārzīmē labāk pēc satelīta skata.
HellMap (2024-05-19 16:17:05+00:00): Pielaboju, cik sapratu no apraksta.

Parasti OSM tādas zīmes vispār neliek, bet gan apzīmē to jēgu/ietekmi uz attiecīgajiem elementiem. Šajā gadījumā - uz ceļa ir `access=private`, jeb piekļuve nav publiski atļauta. Es atstāju tavu komentāru tur, jo vieta stulba un varbūt kādam (visdrīzāk nākotnes kartētājam) palīdzēs saprast situāciju.
MuMBuero (2024-08-08 08:57:42+00:00): Die Großgemeinschaftsunterkunft ist rundum eingezäunt!
Kein Zutritt!  Vorne steht ein Container mit Wachpersonal!
Herwescheluc (2024-08-08 09:51:04+00:00): Alle Angaben ergänzt!
empty_child (2024-05-18 19:05:16+00:00): amenity=fast_food
fast_food=cafeteria
?
JayTurnr (2024-06-18 19:09:20+00:00): Hi, I would like to refer you to this:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
fortera_au (2024-05-18 23:50:46+00:00): Hi, descriptive names like this shouldn't be used.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151490438
Jfact0ry (2024-05-19 22:24:03+00:00): Fruit Island? Where did you get that name from?
hauke-stieler (2025-01-11 15:41:58+00:00): Hi,

nur als Hinweis: Zeiten (Öffnungszeiten, Betriebszeiten, Gottesdienstzeiten, etc.) haben in OSM eine gewisse Schreibweise, die standardisiert und maschinenlesbar ist. Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours für alle möglichen Details und Beispiele. Für die Gottesdienstzeit hier wäre es also nicht "sonntags 10:30 Uhr" sondern "Su 10:30".

Viele Grüße
Hauke
Vivek Dumre (2024-05-25 10:21:09+00:00): Thank you for mapping. The mapping looks great and also the changeset comment. Happy Mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151491249
Yuuria (2024-05-18 12:20:37+00:00): Oops, source-  https://mpneratovice.cz/rservice.php?akce=tisk&cisloclanku=2016010008
Vivek Dumre (2024-05-25 09:58:07+00:00): Thank you for mapping. The mapping looks great and also the changeset comment. Happy Mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151491354
silversurfer83 (2024-05-18 21:57:19+00:00): Hi :)

hier hast du darum gebeten, dass sich jemand diese Änderung ansieht.

Sieht ganz gut aus. Quelle angegeben, Daten passen dazu. Schön.

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151491678
mueschel (2024-05-19 12:07:53+00:00): I reverted this changeset. You mapped the shadows of clouds on Bing images.
VictorIE (2024-08-12 01:17:34+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9601936938/history

amenity=ice_cream and healthcare=pharmacy :D
Rotilom (2024-08-12 08:35:09+00:00): Thank you for spotting. I repurposed an existing POI using a mobile app, and look like I left old tags.
geisthugo123 (2024-10-08 01:26:09+00:00): Dann müssten normalerweise alle cycleway:right:lane	exclusive verschwinden oder?
svoeth (2024-10-08 12:26:48+00:00): mMn ja. Es ist an vielen Stellen legacy, weil es das früher nicht gab. Die separierte Form ist dan nsinnvoll, wenn ein Grünstreifen o.ä. dazwischen ist. Ich hab das in der Heinheimerstraße mal modelliert, da springt das hin und her.
geisthugo123 (2024-10-08 21:22:04+00:00): ja gut, ging mir nur um den Tag an sich, weil es sich ja jetzt korrekterweise laut tag nicht mehr um eine lane handelt sondern um einen track.
Und für einen track würde sich ja nicht mehr die Frage stellen ob exclusive oder advisory etc
svoeth (2024-10-08 23:25:01+00:00): achso, sorry, da hab ich dich missverstanden.
Nee, in dem Bereich ist der Radweg baulich abgetrennt, deswegen track und nicht lane.
Ohne Trennung bleibt es lane und die kann ja dann auch advisory (Schutzstreifen) oder exclusive (Radstreifen) sein
Sajeevini sivajothy (2024-05-25 15:11:09+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work, and it looks good.
#OMGuru#OSMCha
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151492754
Sajeevini sivajothy (2024-05-25 15:09:36+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work, and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151492909
NeisBot (2024-05-18 13:10:05+00:00): Hi Alfredo Palas, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1204309302

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck