piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
CurlingMan13 (2023-12-12 03:42:17+00:00): Again, I am noticing that you are "lollipoping" landcovers.  Rather than using a multirelation, you are trying to mimick a hole in one landcover by creating a thin strip where it doesn't touch.  Please read up here to avoid further mapping pitfalls.:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#:~:text=the%20building%20itself.-,Common%20mapping%20pitfalls,-Adding%20name%3D*

I have already contacted you about this.  Continued poor mapping will result in escalation to DWG.
gscholz (2023-12-12 13:18:00+00:00): Hi VahagnV,
your recent changesets have created several errors regarding overlapping ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=44.57043&lat=40.88640&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=144978998

As you may know, this kind of errors irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps.

Can you please fix this?

Kind regards
Guido
dadavid (2023-12-11 12:33:44+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OSM!
leider ist hier vermutlich aus Versehen beim Bearbeiten ein Node verrutscht, wodurch diese Straße [1] quer durch Häuser verlief. Das lässt sich hier [2] halbwegs erkennen (ein guter Grund fürs Hochladen mehrerer kleiner Änderungssätze statt einem großen, ist hier aber natürlich okay und absolut im Rahmen). Ich habe den Teil der Änderung rückgängig gemacht und den verrutschten Node wieder an seinen ursprünglichen Platz gesetzt. 

Viele Grüße und weiterhin happy mapping!

David

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/84516126
[2] https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=144979023&relations=true
[3] https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/428175664 bzw https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/428175664
dadavid (2023-12-11 14:29:01+00:00): Ein anderer User hat mitlerweile die Änderung komplett zurückgesetzt, da auch die Geometrie des Gärtnereigeländes kaputt gegangen war. 

Der User hat zurecht angemerkt, dass das tagging von access=private und foot etc =yes hier falsch ist, denn highway=path impliziert bereits motor_vehicle=no, siehe auch die entsprechende Seite im Wiki. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/42826138


Ich vermute mal, hier sollte ein Routing-Problem gelöst werden. 

Eine Tagging-Standard-konforme OSM-Routingapplikation sollte einen highway=path ohnehin unabhängig vom access tag nicht für normales PKW- oder LKW Routing vorschlagen. 

Welche Software wird denn verwendet bzw wie stellt sich das Problem da? 

Viele Grüße
David
stimme-logistik (2024-02-05 10:31:46+00:00): Hallo zusammen, tut uns sehr leid, wir sind neu und bearbeiten derzeit auf Grund eines neuen Systems die Straßen - Zufahrts- & Zugangswege. Hier ist ggf. tatsächlich meinem Kollegen was durchgegangen. Das Thema mit einzelnen Themen bearbeiten und speichern habe ich bereits weitergegeben.
Vielen Dank für's Zurücksetzen - bitte habt etwas Geduld mit uns und wenn wir was falsch machen, bitte eine kleine Info. 

Wäre es besser wenn hier jeder mit seiner eigenen Mail-Addy arbeitet? 
Viele Grüße
Ramona
CurlingMan13 (2023-12-12 03:39:48+00:00): Again, I am noticing that you are "lollipoping" landcovers.  Rather than using a multirelation, you are trying to mimick a hole in one landcover by creating a thin strip where it doesn't touch.  Please read up here to avoid further mapping pitfalls.:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#:~:text=the%20building%20itself.-,Common%20mapping%20pitfalls,-Adding%20name%3D*

I have already contacted you about this.  Continued poor mapping will result in escalation to DWG.
jptolosa (2023-12-18 16:02:35+00:00): Hello,

In this changeset you have damaged polygons of some lakes causing its disappearance. Please be more careful and do smaller changesets for a better checking.

Regards.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144979247
jptolosa (2023-12-18 16:38:31+00:00): In the changesets 144564187 and 144809115 also some polygons was broken. Probably in more changesets too.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-12-10 22:30:32+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11408570285
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11408570284
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11408570283
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11408570282
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11408570281
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11408570286
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11408570272
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11408570262
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11408570261
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11408570263
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/293205895
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/293205666
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/293205690
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/293205584
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/293205829
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/293205712
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/293205585
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/293205586
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/293205718
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/293205745

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
tyfi (2023-12-10 22:30:08+00:00): And stop/yield signs
CurlingMan13 (2023-12-12 03:40:18+00:00): Again, I am noticing that you are "lollipoping" landcovers.  Rather than using a multirelation, you are trying to mimick a hole in one landcover by creating a thin strip where it doesn't touch.  Please read up here to avoid further mapping pitfalls.:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#:~:text=the%20building%20itself.-,Common%20mapping%20pitfalls,-Adding%20name%3D*

I have already contacted you about this.  Continued poor mapping will result in escalation to DWG.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-12-10 23:00:46+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1230210163

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
CurlingMan13 (2023-12-12 03:40:30+00:00): Again, I am noticing that you are "lollipoping" landcovers.  Rather than using a multirelation, you are trying to mimick a hole in one landcover by creating a thin strip where it doesn't touch.  Please read up here to avoid further mapping pitfalls.:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#:~:text=the%20building%20itself.-,Common%20mapping%20pitfalls,-Adding%20name%3D*

I have already contacted you about this.  Continued poor mapping will result in escalation to DWG.
CurlingMan13 (2023-12-12 03:41:11+00:00): Also, do not map such that landcovers overlap partially.
aTarom (2023-12-11 08:36:01+00:00): Hola arluzea, gracias por aportar conocimiento local, el name "Donde salta el agua" es una descripción, hay que buscar el tag adecuado, mira en la wiki si sirve de punto de partida por ejemplo:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Waterfalls
Si no lo encuentras coméntalo con la comunidad y te ayudamos en
https://t.me/OSMes
o
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/es/51
Saludos
wlgann (2023-12-11 15:01:59+00:00): Looks like you're fixing this course faster than I was. Nice work, I'll leave it alone for a while.
citrula (2023-12-11 01:13:03+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Thank you for making the effort to contribute and improve the map. residential=gated is not really a meaningful tag on road ways. You can map the gate (please see the wiki for more information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dgate ) 
and also mark the private roads with access=private. Happy to answer any more questions you may have!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144980770
NorthCrab_upload (2023-12-11 00:10:24+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11408675635
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11408675665

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
OSM_RogerWilco (2023-12-11 12:54:48+00:00): Ich möchte Dich bitten damit aufzuhören. "Wohnmobilstellplatz am Strandbad Dorfmark" ist kein Name, sondern eine Beschreibung.

Wo wurden überhaupt diese flächendeckenden Massenedits mit der lokalen Community diskutiert? Und achte bitte darauf, dass Du nur Quellen verwendest, die für OSM verwendbar sind (Lizenz).
OSM_RogerWilco (2023-12-11 12:55:12+00:00): Viele Grüße aus Dorfmark.
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2023-12-11 16:56:11+00:00): No it is not a description, it is a descriptive name.
And many names are descriptive and there is nothing wrong in that.

The eastern station in Berlin is called "Berlin Ostbahnhof" which is also descriptive.

As are for example "Kita an der Hochschule für Technik und Wirtschaft Berlin"
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6123173591

New York have a long beach which is named "Long Beach". 

Stratford-upon-Avon is also descriptive. 

Historically that is how most things are named.

Motorhome stopovers are just not that old. But they still have names.

As for the local community, the Luneburger Heide company is an umbrella organization for local cities/counties so I think we can assume that the names are locally known. Besides motorhome stopovers are used by non-local travelers, so we should also consider which names they use. It is comparable to e.g., marinas. If you ask the locals living next to Margreheholms Havn in Copenhagen, most would not know the name. But sailors do. And we also name small harbours on uninhabited islands. And we name uninhabited islands. And there did OSM get all those names from? 

As for licence, I see no issue at double checking a dozen names with brochures from a tourist agency owned by official local administrations.

And it is not the only site using that name. If you search for "Wohnmobilstellplatz am Strandbad Dorfmark" you find other sites using the name or longer versions. I just mentioned  Lüneburger Heide GmbH because it is the most official source.
CurlingMan13 (2023-12-12 03:37:50+00:00): Why did you not connect the golf cartpaths with a bridge where there is one?  You seem very detail oriented, so I encourage you to add the last bit of detail.  I have gone ahead and added the cartpath bridge for you.
Zdurov Andrei (2023-12-11 08:12:43+00:00): Спасибо, актуально)
archpdx (2023-12-11 17:44:34+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Thanks for adding this business. Please note that most national brands like Claire's have their own feature type which automatically applies the correct tags (`shop=fashion_accessories` in this case instead of `merchandise=Jewelry`)
Glassman (2023-12-11 19:10:37+00:00): #TIP: instead of deleting then redrawing the object - just update the tags. By doing so, it save the history of an object
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144981348
Baloo Uriza (2023-12-11 20:05:43+00:00): Looks like you moved operator to operator:wikidata, removing the correct wikidata and operator values
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144981384
wizerbar (2023-12-11 10:59:41+00:00): норм. только пользуйтесь большим увеличением, т.к. страдает точность границ - слишком большие интервалы.
Glassman (2023-12-11 19:07:10+00:00): #TIP: OSM was started in England so we use their road classifications and British English spellings. An unclassified road is just a rural residential road. This road looks more like a service road. Can you review this edit?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144981531
archpdx (2023-12-11 17:51:03+00:00): Based on this changeset from another mapper, it appears that this trail and parking lot no longer exists: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138284226

Aerial imagery also suggests this.
NaomiClarkCollege (2023-12-11 18:12:19+00:00): No, it does exist, it is just unpaved. I live here and visit it so I know
NaomiClarkCollege (2023-12-11 18:13:34+00:00): Also, google maps also has it on there.
Allison P (2023-12-12 03:46:19+00:00): Google Maps is very low quality. They are no authority and shouldn't be used as a source anyhow. Their map, terrible as it is, is still protected as a creative work by copyright.
tyfi (2023-12-11 01:00:43+00:00): Large bbox due to sparse changeset
Mashin (2023-12-12 20:32:43+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM!
Thanks for your edits, but please be careful. I noticed that a lot of times you created duplicate objects.
e.g.
here you created this node: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11017175927
Which is a duplicate of the hospital that exists as an area:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/442099131
Udarian (2023-12-18 03:46:55+00:00): Question?
Why did you change the name of most of the name:*=* when according to the change set comment you should only have added/edited the name:chr (from my understanding that’s the code for cherokee) it seams unless you know, in some cases somewhere around 60 ' odd languages. Also I’m sure there’s a good reason the Bahamas is called the Bahamas, I ask because you seem  to have changed the name:en from “The Bahamas” to “Bahamas”.
Aleksandar Matejevic (2024-01-08 14:37:41+00:00): I have a question too, what is the purpose of switching the names from the node to a realation and from the relation to the node?

You have changed name:en from The Bahamas to Bahamas on the relation, and from Bahamas to The Bahamas on the node

Can you, for a while, stop doing these changes and discuss them on the osm forum?
jSeke (2025-11-23 12:51:24+00:00): Scottish Gaelic and Irish are different languages, don't copy paste like that.
emersonveenstra (2023-12-12 13:05:45+00:00): Hi there,

On a foot path like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/409901578, the "surface" tag can only have one value, if there's multiple types of surfaces, you need to split up the way and add the correct surface values to each section. Hope this helps!
Glassman (2023-12-11 19:13:37+00:00): #TIP: Add in the stream for the waterfall. Also waterfalls should be tagged as a waterway=waterfall. Can you update this edit?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144983785
Matt_ (2023-12-11 03:48:03+00:00): Please see: Please see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/US_National_Inventory_of_Dams

And also: https://maproulette.org/browse/challenges/42603
fortera_au (2023-12-11 05:00:20+00:00): Hey there, are these areas actually named (with signs or something verifiable on the ground) Overnight Camping and Overflow Camping or are they just descriptions?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144984632
emersonveenstra (2023-12-11 11:35:49+00:00): This is the middle of a golf course. deleted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144996019
tux67 (2023-12-11 10:25:36+00:00): Hi deekpurb,
on the Images available (Bing, NRW DOP, etc) there is no evidence of a bollard here. Also there are no mapillary pictures available. 
As you are mapping remotely - please share the evidence about a normal street being blocked at this very unusual position.

BR
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144985052
tux67 (2023-12-11 10:27:24+00:00): Apologies - my fault - found the Mapillary pictures now.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144985052
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2023-12-11 05:42:56+00:00): 主要是修meongseolin在 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144246871 中的贡献
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2023-12-11 05:41:54+00:00): Some of objects was rescued in https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/changeset/102294

n7074394889,w757521108,w757521109,w757521110,w757521115
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2023-12-11 05:48:38+00:00): 因为是JOSM开平行线开出来的，所以自然是反着的啦！
tjvrulz (2024-07-24 15:53:10+00:00): This short residential access road was deleted incorrectly
tjvrulz (2024-07-24 15:52:53+00:00): This short residential access road was deleted incorrectly
tjvrulz (2024-07-24 15:52:33+00:00): This road was incorrectly shortened.
Source: I live in this area
tjvrulz (2024-07-24 15:54:39+00:00): Road was incorrectly shortened. Removes access for last 3 houses
slice0 (2023-12-11 22:22:44+00:00): I am reporting this changeset, nothing here is based on any facts
fortera_au (2023-12-11 22:26:55+00:00): This is based on surveys, aerial imagery, and local knowledge.
slice0 (2023-12-11 22:30:53+00:00): ok that data didnt detect that gawler river road was not named correctly its not reliable information
fortera_au (2023-12-11 22:32:30+00:00): I didn't update anything to do with naming, the update was to the highway classification. This was mapped based on what is on the ground.
conradoos (2023-12-11 08:39:26+00:00): A dlaczego drogę przez las znowu zmieniłeś na highway=service? Czy charakter tej drogi i ruch na niej faktycznie odpowiada definicji highway=service?
:-} (2023-12-11 11:00:39+00:00): Tak
conradoos (2023-12-11 12:08:03+00:00): A możesz coś więcej napisać? W jaki sposób to stwierdziłeś?
tyfi (2023-12-11 06:16:08+00:00): Bbox is large because I touched multiple route relations (each very tiny) throughout the state in addition. Specifically, I removed the "is_in:state=MO" tag from them which I added about six months ago and which I now realize is redundant and fragile.
jmaspons (2023-12-30 12:44:04+00:00): Em sembla que era correcte. Un codi wikidata fa referència al poble i l'altre al municipi (alguns inclouen més d'un poble i estan representats per una relació en comptes d'un node)
andi9876 (2024-02-11 09:10:37+00:00): Hello,
you added lots pharmacys, also double. Please be sure you add just once and at correct location, not direct on the street.
Baloo Uriza (2023-12-11 20:24:34+00:00): Probably should use the Dollar General preset in your editor as this is missing a shop=* tag.  Including meaningful commit comments would be appreciated as well.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144987185
pitfire (2023-12-11 14:57:21+00:00): Hallo Obusek,
danke für Deine Anpassungen und willkommen bei OSM.
In Deinem Acount liegen ein paar nützliche Infos für weitere Aktivitäten! 
VG pitfire
Tatti Barletta (2023-12-11 09:02:22+00:00): Ciao, ho notato che alcune delle tue ultime modifiche disallineano parecchio alcuni elementi rispetto della mappa, probabilmente nel tentativo di combaciare con le immagini aeree di Bing? Il fatto è che non sempre le immagini aeree sono correttamente geolocalizzate, per questo l'editor iD nelle impostazioni dello sfondo ha un pannello per configurarne l'offset rispetto ai dati OSM.
In linea di massima prima di incominciare a ricalcare sarebbe bene cercare di allineare le immagini a caratteristiche come strade e base di edifici, per essere sicuri almeno che le proporzioni vengano rispettate.
Ashok Thakulla (2023-12-11 11:14:39+00:00): changeset 144987699. Dear mapper correct it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144987699
amritkarma (2023-12-30 02:52:10+00:00): Hi,

It is unclear what was the error in this changeset. It seems the edits have been deleted for now but it is unclear why.
Ashok Thakulla (2023-12-30 16:27:04+00:00): hi! 
error was the path created where there is no sign of path in that topography. corrected. mapped ridge as the path. so deleted .
Ashok Thakulla (2023-12-11 11:13:36+00:00): Recheck these changeset: 144006712, 11807790. Don't think that is path. Correct it Mapper..
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144988226
5m4u9 (2023-12-13 08:21:41+00:00): Hi, Bing/ESRI satellite images have an offset, you have to adjust the offset before editing.

I reverted this changeset.
HaldenCanal (2023-12-14 09:00:31+00:00): Hello 5m4u9, thank you for letting me know. Have a nice day.
Frans S (2023-12-12 12:41:54+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are far away from the quality we expect and had to remove your mappings. It costs more time to correct them rather than map them from scratch. Sorry !

We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
very Inaccurate mapping 
Buildings not squared.
Nodes connected to other features.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144988378
Mazda05 (2024-02-03 17:56:28+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Russian–Ukrainian_war
neuhausr (2023-12-11 16:54:35+00:00): Hi, in response to your note, couldn't you just include separate values for "owner" and "operator"? Also, I noticed you tagging "access=yes" on these parks. While that isn't wrong, access is typically only tagged on leisure features when there's a restriction. YMMV though. Happy mapping!
Hugoren Martinako (2023-12-20 13:47:37+00:00): Buenas,

Has eliminado los nodos identificativos (place=) de entidades de población:
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11202073571
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11202073572
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11202073569

Estos nodos tienen propósitos estadísticos, puesto que están catalogados por el IGN. No se deben borrar.

Los recupero en un siguiente changeset.

MfG
KasperSFranz (2023-12-11 08:41:07+00:00): This should have been two different changesets - not sure how they got mixed up
literan (2023-12-11 08:33:12+00:00): It's vandalism
revent (2023-12-11 08:44:43+00:00): Huge size is from incidentally finding and repairing a missing section of the "Contiguous US" boundary which verifying continuity.
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2023-12-11 08:33:47+00:00): It seems that I wrote the wrong position. I may have forgotten to add ({{bbox}}) in the Overpass query and then directly edited the points containing converted_by among the first 500 points.
dzamper (2023-12-13 09:54:09+00:00): „Nie dotyczy dojazdu do posesji” to chyba raczej access=destination?
JLZIMMERMANN (2024-10-30 07:39:53+00:00): bonjour Benoit,
J'ai passé pas mal de temps à disjoindre les géométries résidentielles et autres occupation des sols aux fossés qui ont été qualifiés par tes soins. 
Tout d'abord bravo pour ton sens du détail !
Je te propose de regarder de façon générale la finesse de la numérisation en Vaucluse. C'est l'objet d'un acharnement de ma part depuis 2011.
L'idée est de ne pas faire déborder une occupation sur une emprise qui pourrait elle-même faire l'objet d'une géométrie surfacique : un fossé (ou cours d'eau) ou une voirie peuvent également avoir un polygone correspondant.
Pour mieux comprendre la qualité que je pousse en Vaucluse c'est ici https://peertube.openstreetmap.fr/w/jWSHEUwgGTHJkoNM53Daz9
Bonne journée :-)
Jean-Louis