piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
vectorial8192 (2026-04-06 15:30:58+00:00): OK, to be honest I was not aware my changesets are 15% of "all changesets". So many years I was under the impression that I only make "a few" changesets. Naturally this means I should proportionally be getting more comments, but this obviously does not fit my mental model.

[Other words seems best sent elsewhere]

-------

Going back to this, the "end of road" relaxation, honestly idk, and I am just using my own art style for this. Granted, I do not think OSM Global has specs that go into such detail as to describe how to actually map "end of the road" shapes. We may have some flexibility here.
Yunan973 (2026-04-05 12:02:00+00:00): Bonjour,

un multipolygone est un ensemble de surfaces représentant un et un seul élément (un lac outer à l'exclusion d'une île inner par exemple).

Ce n'est pas non plus une relation de type public_transport, voir mon autre message.

Ta relation contient une liste d'éléments complètement disparates (des rails, des bâtiments, des quais...) : c'est ce qu'on appelle une relation type=site.

Il n'y a malheureusement aucune traduction en français de la page wiki disponible en anglais ici https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:site.

J'ai corrigé ta relation, tu peux la corriger à nouveau si tu veux la transformer en relation public_transport.
JOB34 (2026-04-07 08:05:17+00:00): Bonjour, 
Merci pour votre message. 
Je travail pour la SNCF dans le cadre d'un projet de carte indoor. Le but étant de créer des relations public_transport et non des relations sites.
Bien cordialement
Yunan973 (2026-04-11 16:21:20+00:00): Cela ne vous dispense pas de respecter les règles d'OSM : OSM n'est pas un outil de la SNCF où vous pouvez faire ce que vous voulez. Il convient de respecter le wiki et de faire des relations public_transport ou des relations multipolygones qui en sont. 
Si vous mettez n'importe quoi dans ces relations (par exemple des rails), vous pouvez être sûr que quelqu'un passera après vous et corrigera votre travail qui n'aura donc servi strictement à rien.
eggie (2026-04-03 14:27:55+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  Wordt hier een woonwijk gebouwd. De tags zeggen construction=residential?
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-04-03 14:34:17+00:00): Je hebt een waterway = river aan de multipolygoon toegevoegd? Dat lijkt me niet correct.
eggie (2026-04-03 14:44:26+00:00): Landuse en water heb ik gescheiden.
De waterway=river heb ik verwijderd
eggie (2026-04-03 14:48:36+00:00): Wellicht heb je hier iets aan.
https://viewer.satellietdataportaal.nl/@51.98023,5.884080,16/?datastrip=20260308_SVNEO-01&sensorname=SuperView-NEO
Gr eggie
NeisBot (2026-04-03 14:18:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13546679129 v4

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Auto repair shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisAgent (2026-04-03 16:34:04+00:00): 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again?
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-04 10:51:41+00:00): Reverted series of changesets adding SEO POI and blatantly promotional description=* and other malformed tags to it

https://osm.org/changeset/185084799
Valerio_Bozzolan (2026-04-03 14:51:35+00:00): Ciaaao PaoloXD: grazie per i tuoi contributi, però per favore salva molto più spesso le tue modifiche, così i "changeset" sono più piccini, e così nella community possiamo controllarci a vicenda più facilmente.
Ciau un caro saluto
PaololXD (2026-04-03 14:59:19+00:00): Ciao Valerio. Mi scuso ma ti giuro vedere warning su warning su warning venire su un po' alla volta mi portano a continuare e a continuare. Cercherò di farli un po' più mirati comunque così da evitare problemi. Comunque sono delle modifiche più relative a tag che ad altro per quello continuo anche perché spesso è la stessa cosa ripetuta 50 volte. Comunque ringrazio del consiglio da ora in poi cercherò di essere un pelo meno pesante con le modifiche.

Un saluto Valerio
Valerio_Bozzolan (2026-04-03 15:14:43+00:00): Per quanto mi riguarda ti auguro di fare milioni di milioni di modifiche :D
Il consiglio era solo di salvare quando ci si allontana di zona, o quando le modifiche sono già un po'.
Io personalmente salvo "a caso" anche per non perdere il lavoro se si inciuppa il browser :D
ciaaao grazie
Senihtu (2026-04-04 06:19:06+00:00): Guten Morgen!
Du scheinst Dich ja im Odenwald etwas auszukennen.
Obwohl - das mit der Brücke in Bad König habe sogar ich schon mitbekommen.
Jedenfalls sind von der Sperrung und Deiner Änderung gestern mehrere Buslinien betroffen.
Kennst Du Dich gut genug aus, um die Relationen für die Restbauzeit umzulegen?
(und bekommst Du mit, wenn sie wieder die alten Wege fahren?)
und schöne Feiertage noch!
Geo-Tobi (2026-04-04 07:16:03+00:00): Grüß dich, ja, das nötige Wissen um Relationen ist vorhanden. Aber: Hast du wahrgenommen, dass ich psv=yes gesetzt habe? Damit sollte es keinerlei Auswirkungen auf bestehende Buslinien geben. 
Die Beschilderung vor Ort ist
https://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/?signs=253,257-54,1026-32
Wie kommst du zu der Aussage, dass die Buslinien unterbrochen sind? Habe ich was übersehen?
Grüße
Senihtu (2026-04-04 09:23:00+00:00): Woher ich meine Infos habe? Morgens zum Aufwachen schaue ich bei https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/DE/HE/DE-HE-RMV-Analysis.diff.html vorbei.
Und da steht bei OREG-30 unter anderem "eingeschränkte Befahrbarkeit ('bus'='no') auf Wegen. Der Schlüssel 'bus' beinhaltet auch ÖPNV-Busse "

Das mit den Bussen ist irgendwie verdreht bei OSM. Da muß vermutlich bus=yes, tourist_bus=no hin. (Hab ich immer einen Bogen drum gemacht.)
happy mapping!
Geo-Tobi (2026-04-05 08:52:27+00:00): Ist jetzt korrigiert, sehe ich das richtig? (Wenngleich ich der Meinung bin, dass psv=yes ausreichen sollte.)
Senihtu (2026-04-06 07:48:20+00:00): jo. Fehlermeldung ist weg. 
Das mit psv und bus ist wirklich schräg. finde ich auch.
hätten die beim Festlegen mal uns gefragt!
dav23r (2026-04-03 14:45:51+00:00): .. fix typo in all lang variants of last name "Chokhonelidze"; add name:eymology:wikidatasfor  all mentioined persons' respective str. relations.
eggie (2026-04-03 19:30:51+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Cybermanx (2026-04-03 15:02:24+00:00): Il link nei "source" è un comunicato stampa in cui viene annunciata la proposta della giunta. Purtroppo non riesco a trovare atti di quegli anni, il sistema di ricerca proprio non li trova. 
Le targhette sono 4: una dove c'è il sottopassaggio alla tangenziale, uno vicino al PalaCUS e alla piscina, uno all'ingresso del parcheggio a sud del parco e infine uno al secondo attraversamento pedonale (provenendo da Via Scandellara, da Sud a Nord). Da Maps si può vedere che nel 2015 c'era un cartello verde ovale, all'altezza del PalaCUS, con scritto "Parco Campagna Via Larga", e nel 2017 sono comparse le targhette attuali
Vedi anche https://osm.org/changeset/180707403
NeisBot (2026-04-03 15:13:13+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/1910751529 v4

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Fish River Grill restaurant"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-11 16:33:18+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181198177
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
NeisBot (2026-04-03 15:16:29+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13699438950 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Seafood restaurant"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-11 16:33:21+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181198180
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
CRCulver (2026-04-05 19:49:39+00:00): Your edit here was destructive. You changed my area:highway=pedestrian for the area trace to highway=pedestrian, area=yes. However, this is incorrect as it duplicates the highway=pedestrian that was already present. I have therefore reverted this in changeset 180913617.

Please consult the OSM wiki for tag usage before making such edits in future, thanks.
Berdly (2026-04-09 14:51:12+00:00): Argh, sorry about that. iD, my editor, shows a different way to tag it so I assumed the tags were out of date. My bad.
NeisBot (2026-04-03 15:22:29+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/42292676 v6

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Banquet center"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-11 16:33:24+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181198186
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
Stephen Dawkins (2026-04-05 18:40:22+00:00): The source for this should be Arun District Council Tax Records, not Adur
jowilb (2026-04-05 12:25:42+00:00): percorso natura beginns with stairs with handrail near via molino , then the way has gravel and mostly handrails
NeisBot (2026-04-03 15:30:55+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13698723744 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Restaurant Pierce Creek"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-11 16:33:30+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181198191
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
YomanNH (2026-04-13 08:06:20+00:00): Jak wiesz, że budowa jest przerwana, to highway=construction też powinieneś poprawić.
dzamper (2026-05-07 08:29:20+00:00): „note w nazwie”
note powinno być w `note` a nie w nazwie ;) bo nie jest nazwą
Growebis (2026-04-04 08:20:07+00:00): 35*
Frans S (2026-04-16 10:37:11+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
What did you decide that this building is damaged?
I cannot find any proof for that. Bing, GE 
I retag it to undamaged.
Best regards
Palolo (2026-04-16 15:53:53+00:00): Frans, Thank you for the comment. The differences between the Bing or Esri imagery, and the 3cm imagery within building footprints led me to tag as damaged. I have no problem with changing to damage:Gezani=no
Regards
eggie (2026-04-03 19:39:57+00:00): Dag Duncan,

Volgens mij zijn deze straten niet als residential aanwezig.
Zie https://viewer.satellietdataportaal.nl/@51.58685,4.463472,19/?datastrip=20260225_SVNEO-04&sensorname=SuperView-NEO

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-04-03 19:44:13+00:00): Aangepast naar highway=path en uitgelijnd
qstep (2026-04-10 22:39:19+00:00): Szia. Ráraktál egy épületet a bejárati épületre: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1495874196

Töröltem, kérlek jelöld máshogy, bár nem tudom van-e erre címke a wikiben.
qstep (2026-04-10 22:50:52+00:00): Erre a vonalra pedig rátettél wikidata címkét, ami már rajta volt az épületen magán: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/418388127/history/2
NeisBot (2026-04-03 15:45:51+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13701548496 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Fruit supermarket"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-11 16:33:33+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181198196
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
jowilb (2026-04-05 12:15:27+00:00): no backrest but you can lean to the wall in the back
JJIglesias (2026-04-03 17:43:50+00:00): Arrastraste unos nodos y afectaste 7 vias. Por favor precaucion. Ya revertimos tu cambio con ese error.

Gracias
Taya_S (2026-04-04 10:12:07+00:00): This edit has been reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180845877
NeisAgent (2026-04-03 16:34:14+00:00): 🕵 The changeset tags appear to reference Google as a data source.

Please note that using Google Maps, Google Street View, or similar Google services as a mapping source is not allowed in OpenStreetMap due to license restrictions.

More information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google

If the data in this changeset was derived from Google or another incompatible source, the edits may need to be reverted.

If this is a misunderstanding and the data was collected from permitted sources (e.g. local survey, Bing imagery, local knowledge, etc.), please clarify in a reply.
Taya_S (2026-04-04 10:10:55+00:00): This edit has been reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180845798
NeisBot (2026-04-03 15:55:21+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13701384309 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Fruit supermarket"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-11 16:33:36+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181198201
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
NeisBot (2026-04-03 15:55:32+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13695720746 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Beauty salon"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-11 16:33:39+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181198202
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
SomeoneElse2 (2026-04-03 15:55:37+00:00): Bing looks very much like a surface crossing here
wolfgang8 (2026-04-03 18:47:24+00:00): Hallo,
die beiden

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13648067285
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1669387906

wären für mich eher Mülleimer als Müllsammelcontainer, auch wenn es mehrere getrennte Behälter für die verschiedenen Müllarten (Papier, Plastik, Restmüll,...) gibt.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dwaste_basket
DerKaiserschmarren (2026-04-04 05:25:05+00:00): Okay, da gebe ich dir Recht.
Ungefähr an dieser Adresse steht auch ein gleicher Müllsammelbehälter.
48.481533, 15.697416
DerKaiserschmarren (2026-04-04 06:24:50+00:00): Ist die jetzige Lösung gut?
wolfgang8 (2026-04-04 08:41:19+00:00): Im Wiki wird dafür entweder

amenity=waste_basket + waste=trash;recycling

oder

amenity=waste_basket + recycling=yes

empfohlen. Wobei mir die zweite Variante passender erscheint, da das "recycling" eigentlich keine Müllart ist.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=waste_basket;recycling
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:waste

Die recycling:* Tags sind denke ich nicht notwendig, da durch ein amenity=waste_basket + waste=trash + recycling=yes eigentlich klar ist, dass es sich um einen Mülleimer mit getrennten Behältern handelt, in dem man z.B. keine größeren Gegenstände/Mengen oder Sondermüll entsorgen kann.
DerKaiserschmarren (2026-04-07 18:03:46+00:00): Ich habe gleich alle drei betroffenen Notes auf einmal geändert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181013894
DerKaiserschmarren (2026-04-07 18:04:05+00:00): Danke für die Erklärungen :)
NeisBot (2026-04-03 16:01:33+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13702378129 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Taco restaurant"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-11 16:33:42+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181198206
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
Taya_S (2026-04-04 10:11:08+00:00): This edit has been reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180845798
Taya_S (2026-04-04 10:11:10+00:00): This edit has been reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180845798
chinook17 (2026-07-03 14:57:56+00:00): Bonjour,
Juste un rappel d'enlever la piste cyclable sur rue, ou encore, mettre cycleway separate, lorsqu'on la cartographie sur highway cycleway en parallèle de la route.
tomhukins (2026-04-09 13:58:14+00:00): Thank you for your work improving the map

There are a lot of changes here, and the two word description "Matlock Bath" isn't very helpful: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

From a quick review, I notice you added https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1495878991 which seems incorrectly tagged given https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building=terrace although I realise it's consisntent with the other terraced houses nearby.
silversurfer83 (2026-04-06 09:19:14+00:00): Moin

schau dir bitte mal diesen Zaun an.

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180820226
SG86 (2026-04-06 11:13:29+00:00): Hallo Silversurfer,
vielen Dank für den Hinweis. Da ist mir ein Fehler unterlaufen.
Ich habe es korrigiert.
Viele Grüße
NeisBot (2026-04-03 16:16:22+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13596532477 v4

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Swimwear store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisAgent (2026-04-03 22:34:46+00:00): 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again?
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-04 10:50:53+00:00): Reverted series of changesets adding SEO POI and blatantly promotional description=* and other malformed tags to it

https://osm.org/changeset/185084776
Frans S (2026-04-04 09:15:39+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.

You see an industrial complex with silos connected to each other at the top. 

Only the silos and the adjacent buildings need to be mapped as individual buildings.

No need to map them as multipolygons.

About mappings of high buildings (both a roof and siding visible)

The Imagery is taken under a certain angle, so you can see more .
Often all visible walls and roofs are mapped as 1 building.
The correct way is to map the roofline and move the whole object on their footprint.

See this video.
For buildings with a few floors, start watching from position 1 minute. 
https://youtu.be/Tpi-BTMVo1M
https://youtu.be/dsfUcslLtVc?si=bEHwRl1sxDI_GA0H
Best regards and keep mapping
NeisBot (2026-04-03 16:19:25+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13702366837 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Countertop store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-11 16:33:45+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181198211
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
NeisBot (2026-04-03 16:22:15+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13695590604 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Auto repair shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-11 16:33:48+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181198215
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
IpswichEdits (2026-04-03 18:02:50+00:00): Nice work as always, @Rowland. Just noticed a small typo in the postcodes you added, they seem to start with "I{8" rather than "IP8".  I'm happy to fix this or leave it to you? 😊