piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
zorglubu (2026-05-04 19:38:13+00:00): Je regarderai quand je rentrerai. Peut être je vous contacterai si nécessaire 😉
Merci
zorglubu (2026-05-09 13:41:43+00:00): J'ai mis une barrière côté sud, parce qu'on la détecte sur les ortho photos, mais rien au nord parce que je ne vois rien. Donc je préfère ne rien mettre plutôt que faire une erreur :-)
Cordialement.
TinPetreković (2025-11-25 11:45:02+00:00): The maxweight:conditional tag was wrongfully added to Gawil Avenue and has been removed in changeset 175106276


https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175106276
NeisBot (2025-12-13 20:48:51+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Salão de tranças africanas em Montijo"
NeisBot (2025-12-13 20:48:51+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
Alielaming (2025-12-13 21:09:47+00:00): Hi team, thank you for the correction. I have made the necessary updates requested. I truly appreciate the warning and guidance.

Hugs.
NeisReview (2025-12-13 21:16:45+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/175898794
Frans S (2025-11-25 15:27:17+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
Rather accuate mapped. However, Please do not cluster buildings and tag them as 1 building.
Best regards
Frans S (2025-11-25 11:56:13+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped them.  However, you overlooked buildings. Vague objects, showing no shadow, are not to be mapped.
Do not connect buildings to a highway or other features.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175106565
pitfire (2025-11-25 12:01:39+00:00): Hallo Orgel1234,

ein access=privat reicht vollkommen für alle Verkehrsarten, dazu braucht es keine Liste aller möglichen Fortbewegungsarten.
VG
empty_child (2025-12-14 21:21:43+00:00): Добрый день
Ваши правки были откачены, так как по сути являются личными заметками

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175935497
woodpeck (2025-11-25 12:43:03+00:00): Hier ist Dir wohl ein Fehler passiert - Du hast lauter Straßen mit roof-Tags versehen ;) ich revertiere diese Änderung.
yorusil (2025-11-25 12:53:51+00:00): Okay danke sorry da habe ich einen Fehler bei der Auswahl gemacht, eine Frage: ist es möglich über JOSM bestehende Dachformen & Dachfarben von Änderungen auszuschließen? habe bis jetzt leider nichts valides dazu gefunden
sykul (2025-11-25 20:33:14+00:00): Merci pour ces informations. N'hésitez pas à les mettre à jour si jamais quelque chose change.
NeisBot (2025-12-13 20:48:52+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Burgers à Aix-en-Provence"
NeisBot (2025-12-13 20:48:52+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisBot (2025-12-13 20:48:53+00:00): Par exemple, une version plus neutre et factuelle de ta description pourrait être : « Burgers à Aix-en-Provence »
---
(Auto-translation)
Elefant aus Wuppertal (2025-12-08 14:08:15+00:00): Hi,

die DB InfraGO selbst verwendet in ihrem Account namens "dbsus" (und viele Bahnmapper) die Schreibweise "DB InfraGO AG".

(Beispiel für eine jüngste Bearbeitung durch die DB in der Nähe: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13011991885 ).

Vielleicht sollte man sich da absprechen, da es ansonsten niemals eine Einheitlichkeit geben wird.
Ich habe früher auch immer mit dem Unternehemszusatz getaggt, sehe aber schon ein, dass es sinnvoller wäre ohne, weiß nur nicht ob alle ( / bzw. die Mehrheit) das so sieht / sehen.
LG
Lukas
Claudius Henrichs (2025-12-31 22:25:21+00:00): Hallo Lukas, danke für den schönen nen Kommentar. Ich habe mich zwischenzeitlich mit dem Mapping Team der InfraGO abgestimmt und bin jetzt auch auf die häufigere Tagging-Variante mit AG umgestiegen.
Elefant aus Wuppertal (2026-01-01 18:18:27+00:00): Hallo Claudius,
alles klar, vielen Dank für die Rückmeldung.
Drafer ® (2025-11-25 13:27:47+00:00): Groblja u Srpskoj Crnji, dva pravoslavna i staro katoličko
BCNorwich (2025-11-26 06:30:05+00:00): You are duplicating highways!
BCNorwich (2025-11-27 07:21:46+00:00): There's been no response so I've removed several duplicated highways, footpaths placed on top of existing roads in 3 changesets.
MxxCon (2025-11-25 21:52:03+00:00): "Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag.

As documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Abbreviations in OSM we don't abbreviate names. They should be fully spelled out.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175108535
Anas masuris (2025-11-25 15:29:35+00:00): Nałożyłeś chodniki w kilku miejscach, sprawdź sobie
Rogoyski (2026-06-26 19:46:35+00:00): Chciałbym również dodać, że linię chodnika prowadzimy mniej więcej jego środkiem, a nie po rowkach dla niedowidzących, gdzie by się one nie znajdowały.
Rogoyski (2026-06-26 19:47:54+00:00): A także, że bez uzasadnienia skasowałeś tag footway=sidewalk w Al. Jerozolimskich.
MxxCon (2025-11-25 21:51:46+00:00): "Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag.

As documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Abbreviations in OSM we don't abbreviate names. They should be fully spelled out.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175109046
MxxCon (2025-11-25 21:51:27+00:00): "Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag.

As documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Abbreviations in OSM we don't abbreviate names. They should be fully spelled out.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175109204
MxxCon (2025-11-25 21:51:15+00:00): "Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag.

As documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Abbreviations in OSM we don't abbreviate names. They should be fully spelled out.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175109250
mcliquid (2025-11-25 14:26:11+00:00): Hello Mapiate, thank you for your work with Rapid and for addressing OSMOSE issues!

I noticed that this changeset includes edits in both England and Italy. While cleaning up data across regions is appreciated, it’s best to keep each upload local to one area. Large geographic ranges make it difficult for others to review or revert changes if something goes wrong.

For future cleanup work, please consider:

* limiting each changeset to a small, well-defined region or country,
* uploading separately for each area,
* and mentioning the specific region in the changeset comment when possible.

You can find more details here:
[https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets)

Thanks for taking the time to improve data quality and for helping keep OpenStreetMap consistent and verifiable!
Mapiate (2025-11-26 12:43:54+00:00): Hi mcliquid, apologies for that. I didn't realize the bounding box had grown so large. I'll keep a closer eye on that.
MxxCon (2025-11-25 21:51:00+00:00): "Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag.

As documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Abbreviations in OSM we don't abbreviate names. They should be fully spelled out.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175109423
MxxCon (2025-11-25 21:50:50+00:00): "Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag.

As documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Abbreviations in OSM we don't abbreviate names. They should be fully spelled out.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175109454
MxxCon (2025-11-25 21:50:38+00:00): "Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag.

As documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Abbreviations in OSM we don't abbreviate names. They should be fully spelled out.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175109837
MxxCon (2025-11-25 21:50:27+00:00): "Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag.

As documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Abbreviations in OSM we don't abbreviate names. They should be fully spelled out.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175109872
MxxCon (2025-11-25 21:50:00+00:00): "Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag.

As documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Abbreviations in OSM we don't abbreviate names. They should be fully spelled out.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175110065
Udarian (2025-11-25 18:01:48+00:00): this is a duplicate object as the address was already mapped on DA Beauty Bar
MxxCon (2025-11-25 21:49:47+00:00): "Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag.

As documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Abbreviations in OSM we don't abbreviate names. They should be fully spelled out.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175110127
MxxCon (2025-11-25 21:49:37+00:00): "Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag.

As documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Abbreviations in OSM we don't abbreviate names. They should be fully spelled out.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175110241
MxxCon (2025-11-25 21:49:12+00:00): As documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Abbreviations in OSM we don't abbreviate names. They should be fully spelled out.

"Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175110277
AntMadeira (2025-11-25 21:18:57+00:00): Olá.
Notei que alteraste a referência da estrada nacional 109 de "EN 109" para "N109".
A nomenclatura no OSM segue a estrutura A X, EN X, EM X e CM X. 
Por favor, evita fazer alterações se não tens a certeza da forma mais adequada e adotada pela comunidade.
Para mais informações, aconselho a leitura:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Portugal/Padroniza%C3%A7%C3%A3o/Estradas

Cumprimentos,
António Madeira.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-11-25 13:30:59+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie powinna zawierać przedrostka. Nazwa ulicy nie powinna zaczynać się od 'ul.', 'ulica' itp. Należy usunąć przedrostek i pozostawić samą nazwę ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13330329364

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

Zasady nazewnictwa ulic w polsce:
https://wiki.osm.org/Pl:Znakowanie_dróg_w_Polsce#Nazewnictwo_ulic

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Sylabowy Kot (2025-11-25 15:58:46+00:00): A co to za reklama produktu w opisie zmian i na profilu? Nazwa zresztą inna niż dodanego POI, który na dodatek został dodany po za obrysem budynku.
bartgron (2025-11-25 17:12:26+00:00): Tu się w ogóle nawet adres nie zgadza, w okolicy nie ma takiej ulicy
bartgron (2025-11-25 17:13:43+00:00): Jest taka ulica w tym mieście ale kawał drogi stąd
Sylabowy Kot (2025-11-26 10:53:06+00:00): Skasowałem to dziwactwo: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175148603
DimaLebedev (2026-01-26 06:14:42+00:00): #mapbox_missing_roads
Vinber-Pro (2025-11-26 09:16:36+00:00): salut,
attention à des noms qui sont descriptifs :) car par exemple si l'on fait une carte dans une autre langue, il est difficile de faire apparaître un nom autre que Maison de santé, si c'est écrit dessus cela peut commencer à y être mais quand même de préférence si c'est vraiment un nom type "Maison de Santé du Béarn des Gaves" ou de Sauveterre-de-Béarn, ...

Cabinet Dentaire c'est bien l'attribut qui le décrit, le nom pourrait être celui du pro ou éventuellement un nom spécifique "à la belle canine" 

à plus
bartgron (2025-11-25 21:31:21+00:00): Opis został usunięty - OpenStreetMap to nie miejsce do reklamowania swoich usług
NeisBot (2025-12-13 20:48:56+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "company offering design and technology services"
NeisBot (2025-12-13 20:48:56+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisBot (2025-12-13 20:48:58+00:00): Na przykład, bardziej neutralna i oparta na faktach wersja Twojego opisu mogłaby brzmieć: "firma oferująca usługi projektowe i technologiczne"
---
(Auto-translation)
pitscheplatsch (2025-12-13 21:15:05+00:00): Thanks for fixing, bartgron.
JoaoPaixao (2025-11-26 09:19:27+00:00): Bom dia,

Por que razão o portão tem que pertencer à way da via, se são elementos distintos?

Obrigado.
luisforte (2025-11-26 11:00:39+00:00): Olá,
Porque o portão é uma estrutura fisica que bloqueia aquela via e por isso faz parte dela. 
Está correctamente mapeado. Confere pf na wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:barrier#How_to_map_barrier_nodes)
bartgron (2025-11-25 21:32:45+00:00): Opis zestawu zmian nie służy do reklamowania swoich usług - OpenStreetMap nie jest do reklamowania (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian)
NorthCrab_upload (2025-11-25 21:42:39+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13330395415

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
bartgron (2025-11-25 21:50:58+00:00): W ogóle czemu ta pinezka jest dodana tak daleko od właściwej lokalizacji? Przecież to nie jest w ogóle ten adres
vasony (2025-11-26 19:05:12+00:00): Szia!

Mi az oka a név helyesírásilag helytelen átírására?
A katasztrófa védelem oldaán is így szerepel:
IX. Kerületi Hivatásos Tűzoltó-parancsnokság

Tamás
aceman444 (2026-05-23 10:13:11+00:00): Hi, these are fake paving stones on the footways. It is just painted concrete with some relief decoration.
eggie (2025-11-25 15:10:18+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback  Meestal zijn tweewielers uitgezonderd van oneway=yes Is dat hier het geval..

Dan toevoegen oneway:bicycle=no en evt ook voor moped en mofa. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-25 19:56:56+00:00): gdzieś ten import był omawiany?

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/import-tagow-nid-zabytkow/138532
K12230LF (2025-12-04 17:13:14+00:00): Bonjour Batik27. A priori ce changeset a supprimé la liaison entre la Rue de Paris et la Rue Amiral Guépratte. Etait-ce voulu ? 
La rue au-dessus, a priori Esplanade des Anciens Combattants a également disparu d'OpenStreetMap. Est-ce lié aux travaux selon vous ?
Batik27 (2025-12-17 09:35:29+00:00): Bonjour K122230LF
Merci pour votre retour. 
Non ce n'était pas voulu. Je suis encore débutante sur Openstreet maps
L'esplanade des anciens, qui est une placette en dessous de la chapelle de Notre Dame du Reun (erreur sur le plan) reste mais la rue qui relie cette esplanade et la rue de Paris est supprimée à terme suite aux travaux. 
Les deux places Saint-Eloi et Saint Herbot restent. Seul la place Saint-Herbot conserve du stationnement avec 34 places prévues. 
Le rond-point entre la rue de Paris et la rue Amiral Troude est également supprimé et remplacé par un cédez-le-passage sur la rue Amiral Troude.
Je me suis aussi permise de proposer de changer le revêtement. On met très rarement de l'asphalte sur la chaussée, souvent réservé en France pour les trottoirs, pour la chaussée, c'est plutôt de l'enrobé. Et à savoir, la Bretagne n'a pas d'usine d'asphalte, donc ce n'est pas un matériau utilisé dans le Finistère.
bartgron (2025-11-25 21:33:34+00:00): Opis zestawu zmian nie służy do reklamowania swoich usług - OpenStreetMap nie jest do reklamowania (osm.wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian)
eggie (2025-11-25 15:12:25+00:00): Hoe kan dit nu Hoogstraat zijn?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-11-25 15:17:29+00:00): Wonderlijk, maar het klopt.
NoorderlichtNL (2025-11-25 15:18:44+00:00): Ingang is via de Hoogstraat. Recent een reanimatie gehad. Als je navigeert naar de Utrechtseweg moet je door het water heen. Heeft ons (brandweer, ambu en politie) onnodig veel tijd gekost. Nagekeken bij het kadaster en het is toch echt Hoogstraat.
eggie (2025-11-25 15:26:52+00:00): Oke, maar het navigeert niet omdat er geen toegangsweg naar toe is. 
Dan zul je emergency = yes bij moeten taggen op het voetpad wanneer jullie LiveNav gebruiken... en als het breed genoeg is voor hulpvoertuigen. 
Je kunt ook de breedte van het pad toevoegen. 
Waar ligt de Hoogstraat hier? 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-11-25 15:28:46+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/127563115#map=18/52.305813/5.045756 Ahh... dat wordt een puzzlestukje hier om dat te laten routeren. 
Probeer het eens met emergency=yes  .. mits dat natuurlijk fysiek mogelijk is.
Supaplex (2025-12-01 09:09:18+00:00): Hi
You remove the local post office in "志學". I should be in that location according to post office website
You can just adjust the building outline, not removing the whole poi from the map.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175113596
Priscilla Kapolo (2025-12-01 09:21:27+00:00): Hi, 

Apologies for that, you can add it back. I must have deleted it accidently.
eggie (2025-11-25 15:19:59+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Zij dit echt huizen met de naam House?
In OSM beschrijven we niet iets met huis, boom, bankje e.d
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-11-25 15:37:40+00:00): Remove houses with name=House

Perhaps a swimming_pool?
Greetz,
eggie
CanopyFalls (2025-11-28 23:43:56+00:00): Edits look good! Thank you for adding this information! And welcome to OSM!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175113708
eggie (2025-11-25 15:21:12+00:00): We gebruiken bij beschrijvingen geen name=House
the_third_man (2025-11-26 07:20:05+00:00): Why not tagged with "abandoned"?
chnuessli (2025-11-26 07:40:07+00:00): @the_third_man i deleted the defi because abandoned seems not right to me.
mona_magdy (2025-11-26 11:36:22+00:00): Hello, mkarau,
Thank you very much for your help in updating the OSM maps in the UAE. I noticed that you added several new roads, and I verified them using recent images dated (Vantor satellite imagery via Vantor Hub 2025-11-17). However, I also noticed that you used the `construction=yes` tag for these roads. This tag is ineffective because it doesn't clearly indicate that these roads are under construction and keeps them within the route. The correct way to use the construction tag is `highway=construction` and `construction=*` (the classification is appropriate). This is a wiki page that explains more about using the tag https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:construction, as shown in these roads (way 1346312029, way 976307189). For example, the roads you created (way 1453592240, way 1453592239) have tags `highway=tertiary` & `construction=yes`, and the appropriate tags for them are `highway=construction` & `construction=tertiary`; this road (way 1453592242) has the appropriate tag `highway=construction` & `construction=motorway_link`; this footway (way 1453592241) should have the tags `highway=construction` & `construction=footway`. It is preferable to connect new roads to an existing road network so that they do not appear to be floating.
This way, we accurately represent the reality while maintaining OSM policy and the route within OSM.
Regards,
Mona Magdy
MxxCon (2025-11-25 21:48:39+00:00): As documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Abbreviations in OSM we don't abbreviate names. They should be fully spelled out.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175114113
MxxCon (2025-11-25 21:48:22+00:00): As documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Abbreviations in OSM we don't abbreviate names. They should be fully spelled out.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175114315
eggie (2025-11-25 15:31:31+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback Wanneer dit het club honk is van de scouting dan
club=scout
amenity=community_centre
community_centre=club_home

MVG
eggie
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
fallinganvil (2025-11-25 16:14:34+00:00): Dankjewel ik heb het welkoms bericht gezien. (Ik ben zelf lid van de ufo stam. Ik heb er geen specifieke openingstijden bij gezet omdat de momenten dat de U.F.O Stam gebruik maakt van het gebouw varieert van week tot week.
eggie (2025-11-25 16:19:13+00:00): Oke, maar het staat nu genoteerd (getagd) als sportlocatie en niet als Scoutinghonk. Klopt dat wel?
Gr eggie
fallinganvil (2025-11-25 16:29:08+00:00): In de tag options had ik geen scouting gerelateerde tags gezien. En aangezien scouting vaak onder sport word geschaart waren de meest gepaste opties die ik kon vinden sports_centre
eggie (2025-11-25 16:37:25+00:00): Gebruikelijk is

club=scout
amenity=community_centre
community_centre=club_home
eggie (2025-11-25 16:57:08+00:00): Tagging aangepast en samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:club%3Dscout
Groet,
eggoe
SomeoneElse (2025-11-29 13:19:54+00:00): Hello,
Not sure how it happened but there's now a bit of a gap at https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2894908#map=19/51.699189/-3.628884 ?
Simon Sustrans (2025-12-01 15:28:24+00:00): Well spotted! I had selected a power cable instead of the adjacent track, now corrected.
SomeoneElse (2025-12-01 22:41:24+00:00): Thanks!