piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ZinaidaZ (2026-06-22 10:50:51+00:00): Hello. In this changeset you've been created disconnected footway https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1531372306
it causes "navigational islands" and makes pedestrian navigation impossible in case of route starts on this way. Please fix it
iuvi (2026-06-22 10:56:18+00:00): Road is istill under construction, It will be fixed after second side of road will be finished
solenoid jam (2026-06-23 04:47:56+00:00): Здравствуйте. 
Подскажите, откуда взята информация о направлении движения по этому участку дороги?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/129219267
Максим Баранаускас (2026-06-23 07:07:59+00:00): Здравствуйте!
Всю информацию я беру с Яндекс Панорам. Вот панорамы для данного участка дороги: https://yandex.ru/maps/org/park_sokolniki/1607357284/?l=stv%2Csta&ll=37.687577%2C55.799563&mode=search&panorama%5Bdirection%5D=70.350609%2C-9.210042&panorama%5Bfull%5D=true&panorama%5Bpoint%5D=37.686107%2C55.799434&panorama%5Bspan%5D=98.838549%2C41.079455&sll=37.145368%2C55.986866&sspn=0.019595%2C0.006508&text=55.799785%2C%2037.689414&z=18.29 . Здесь на этой улице установлен "кирпич".
solenoid jam (2026-06-23 07:16:22+00:00): Понятно. 
Обратите внимание, что с другой стороны этого участка дороги, тоже установлен "кирпич", по этому он не может быть с односторонним движением. Движения там вообще нет. Это ограничение уже зафиксировано атрибутом vehicle=no

https://yandex.ru/maps/org/park_sokolniki/1607357284/?l=stv%2Csta&ll=37.686547%2C55.799563&mode=search&panorama%5Bdirection%5D=216.332818%2C-2.660439&panorama%5Bfull%5D=true&panorama%5Bpoint%5D=37.687561%2C55.801291&panorama%5Bspan%5D=54.247571%2C27.192381&sll=37.145368%2C55.986866&sspn=0.019595%2C0.006508&text=55.799785%2C%2037.689414&z=18

Уберите пожалуйста значение односторонности движения
solenoid jam (2026-06-23 07:37:40+00:00): Еще подскажите пожалуйста, откуда вы берёте эти задачи? Судя по характеру ваших правок, вы работаете на какую то компанию.

Сообщество Openstreetmap старается наладить контакт c участниками организованного редактирования, для лучшего взаимодействия. 
Будет очень хорошо, если ваша группа сделает страничку в wiki, с простым описанием того что и как вы делаете, контактами, и перечислением участников. 
Передайте пожалуйста эту просьбу вашему менеджеру.

Вот пример такой странички:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities/Ozon 

Копировать всё не надо. Достаточно быть понятными, и что бы был контакт
Максим Баранаускас (2026-06-23 08:20:09+00:00): Да, одностороннее движение здесь действительно не нужно, я ошибся. Сделал новую правку, убрал односторонее движение ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184463970#map=18/55.800343/37.686790 ). Спасибо Вам большое за замечание. Я ещё насчёт поворотов на эту улицу хотел уточнить, их получается нужно запретить? Сейчас в osm они разрешены.

Да, правки я делаю для компании StarLine . Просьбу насчёт создания странички передал.
solenoid jam (2026-06-23 08:38:37+00:00): В данном случае ограничение проезда уже заложено атрибутом, указанным на самой дороге. Навигатор туда уже не поведёт. Отношение с ограничением поворота можно сделать, но это бессмысленно, по этому не нужно.
Максим Баранаускас (2026-06-23 09:20:47+00:00): Понял, значит ничего дополнительно указывать не буду.
nevw (2026-06-22 14:01:50+00:00): Hi, can you check the location of Nauti Bites Cafe. Looks like you may have dragged it over a residential area.
nevw (2026-06-22 14:06:17+00:00): ….in this image, from the red dot top right to yellow dot at bottom middle
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=184424444
icedteafanatic (2026-06-23 03:36:58+00:00): Hi there, I can confirm the cafe is in the correct position. The cafe is listed on the local council's tourism website https://themiddleofeverywhere.com.au/en/profiles/nauti-bites-cafe
nevw (2026-06-23 04:20:55+00:00): Great, thanks for checking.
GOwin (2026-06-26 07:51:59+00:00): Kudos! 👏 I'm pleased to see that you're still making lots of improvements to the local map!
MarcilleForever (2026-06-26 12:44:09+00:00): Trying my best, it seems that there are too many places to document and not enough updated online references. I just saw Universal College become a hotel the other day. Thank you for your support, towards documenting Zamboanga for the people!
GOwin (2026-06-27 02:34:15+00:00): It's the same for many other areas where there aren't a lot of contributors yet. So don't feel overwhelmed by it, and also remember to have enjoy it.  

With regard to "online references", do you mean updated imagery? Do you know that people can actually contribute their drone imagery for use in OSM? For example check out this contributor in Bohol: https://map.openaerialmap.org/#/123.870849609375,9.655077084081547,12/square/13233002000321/697e28f6fa803de2dbce3ad5
TrickyFoxy (2026-07-01 10:09:34+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184905253
mcliquid (2026-06-23 07:31:34+00:00): Hallo androl,
darf man die Website der Postleitzahlsuche der Deutschen Post für OpenStreetMap legal verwenden? Ich kann weder in den OSM Permissions noch in den Nutzungsbedingungen der Postleitzahlsuche eine Erlaubnis finden.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Permissions
https://www.postdirekt.de/plzserver/terms-of-use

Danke für die Auskunft
lukabułka (2026-06-22 11:27:52+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13957513131 - jeśli brak w terenie to po co oznaczać?
SzymonH (2026-06-22 14:03:23+00:00): Bo linia busów, która tamtędy jeździ, ma go w swoim rozkładzie :D
lukabułka (2026-06-22 17:22:07+00:00): a to w takim razie ma to sens
SzymonH (2026-07-20 12:12:17+00:00): UMiG w odpowiedzi na mój wniosek poinformował, że przystanek jest czynny i "trwają ustalenia" dlaczego zniknęło oznakowanie. Czyli prędzej czy później przystanek wróci.
lukabułka (2026-07-20 15:04:05+00:00): 👍
yelisey90 (2026-06-22 17:53:43+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1530853766
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1531383798
service=parking_aisle without highway=service
that's incorrect
nikolaymapper (2026-06-23 03:08:41+00:00): Hello, yelisey90. You're absolutely right, thanks for catching that! Fixed now. Thanks.
dafadllyn (2026-06-30 21:10:19+00:00): Hæ!

Thank you for updating Hringvegur at Hornafjörður! I just wanted to do this, but you were faster. Did you deliberately not add toll=yes? As you probably know, this new section of Hringvegur will become a toll road on 1 September 2026. [1]

By the way, how did you find out that the old Hringvegur at Hornafjörður is now route 987? Is it already signed as such? I couldn't find any information online. (On umferdin.is, the old road is still labelled '1', and i couldn't find a more recent edition of Vegaskrá than 2025.

Best regards,
Raphael

[1]: https://www.vegagerdin.is/vegagerdin/starfsemi/frettir/nyr-hringvegur-1-um-hornafjord-opnadur-24-juni
Kerploonk (2026-06-30 21:34:34+00:00): Hi,

Yes, the road is toll-free for now, thus it is not appropriate to tag it as such to begin with.

Vegaskrá is updated yearly, so the 2025 one is valid for the road system as it was in the end of 2025 (published start of 2026).

At the time of this changeset I used an overview picture from Vegagerðin's website: https://www.vegagerdin.is/media/2026/06/hornafjordur_kaflar-copy.pdf

This picture differs however compared to the actual data layer provided by Vegagerðin, updated after the road formally opened, which I corrected in a later changeset. The data layer also provides the hierarchy (road type) and name of each road, so it's more accurate than the overview picture.

The data layer is available on https://kort.gis.is/mapview/?app=kort under "Vegir Vegagerðarinnar".

Best regards,
Aron
dafadllyn (2026-07-02 17:29:34+00:00): Hæ Aron!

Takk fyrir svarið and for pointing me to 'Vegir Vegagerðarinnar'!

Yes, you are right, toll=yes would currently be wrong.

On another note: Do you know if there is an online group or similar where people mapping in Iceland discuss? I started a thread about unmarked hiking routes in Iceland on the OSM forum and would be interested to hear the opinions of local mappers.

Best regards,
Raphael
TrickyFoxy (2026-07-01 10:09:35+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184905253
pitscheplatsch (2026-06-23 06:20:53+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
Is the added name real?
trial (2026-07-07 18:18:41+00:00): Your move doesn't seem to make any sense to me.
The initial position WAS correct. Please CHECK if you understand the imagery before doing that!
You have a kerb here (at the original position): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1536274781
buses stop at the corresponding slots.
Aliaksei_Astraukh (2026-07-08 11:19:58+00:00): "Hello Trial,

Thank you for pointing out this issue. Please accept my apologies. I've fixed the initial position you mentioned.

Sincerely,
Aliaksei"
trial (2026-07-08 11:29:37+00:00): Appologies accepted, MapBox should train their employees better, so that you improve the map, not the opposite (in good faith).
Fizzie-DWG (2026-07-06 06:30:09+00:00): DWG revert - vandalism & improper deletions

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185177550
Marek-M (2026-06-23 12:27:44+00:00): Cześć, OSM ma określone zasady co do nazw POI. Nie jest to miejsce na SEO. Poprawiłem Twoją edycję i zaktualizowałem dane na poprawne w OSM: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13957585781
Tatfahren (2026-06-22 17:43:45+00:00): Du hast als Quelle für die korrigierten "opening_hours" in vermutlich allen zugehörigen changesets "esri" angegeben. Ich denke das war ein Versehen, da die Öffnungszeiten wohl nicht auf das Dach geschrieben sein werden.
MKnight (2026-06-22 20:39:08+00:00): Das ist richtig, allerdings hätte ich alternativ noch: "spec", "overpass" oder "brain.exe" (oder alles zusammen) als Auswahl.

esri ist für mich so eine Art wildcard wo "sinnvolle" Quelle auch nicht besser ist.

Hast Du eine sinnvolle Quelle für mich die mehr sagt als "fix opening"?
MKnight (2026-06-22 20:42:20+00:00): Nachtrag: ich habe auch nur die Syntax korrigiert, ob die Zeit real richtig ist nur vor Ort prüfbar.
Tatfahren (2026-06-23 04:02:58+00:00): Im Prinzip lasse ich die Quelle bei solchen Änderungen weg wenn es keine Quelle gibt, stattdessen kannst du genau das im changeset angeben das du nur die syntax korrigiert hast, dann erwartet niemand das du dazu eine mögliche unerlaubte Quelle verwendet hast.

Esri ist halt falsch, "Overpass" ist ein verwendetes Werkzeug und nicht die Quelle, brain.exe gibt es vermutlich gar nicht (nicht beleidigend oder persönlich gemeint, mir fällt aber keine bessere Formulierung ein).

Ich hab auch schon gesehen das zur Wikiseite verlinkt wurde, wo die entsprechende syntax dokumentiert wurde, also als Quelle für die Art der Schreibweise.
MKnight (2026-06-26 20:35:11+00:00): ok, danke.
adamos (2026-06-23 09:02:55+00:00): I am fixing it for now. Next time please make sure you dont break bus line relations that runs through the edited intersections, thank you
World_Winner (2026-06-29 14:56:42+00:00): Hello adamos,

Thank you for making the corrections and for bringing this to my attention.  In this case, I overlooked the impact of the edited geometries on the bus line relations, and I appreciate you taking the time to correct it.

I will make sure to check for affected route relations more carefully before making similar edits in the future.
rskedgell (2026-06-22 12:39:02+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

A way tagged as highway=footway in the UK already implies no access for other transport modes, so adding bicycle=no is usually redundant.

An exception is where there is a sign explicitly prohibiting cycling on the footway ( traffic_sign=GB:951 ), in which case you can also add bicycle:signed=yes

There's a table of default access assumptions for different highway=* types in the UK at:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#United_Kingdom
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-21 04:54:36+00:00): SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more information.

Reverted adding SEO spam POI with malformed tags/values in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/186095547
sweaty_techie (2026-06-23 01:54:34+00:00): This appears to deliberately revert a correct edit. Do you have any valid reason for the revert?
Instead of messing up the map history with an edit war, leave a comment on the change that you have an issue with and explain why.
This applies to your last 50 change sets...
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184428234
Fizzie-DWG (2026-07-06 06:30:10+00:00): DWG revert - vandalism & improper deletions

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185177550
caprieldeluca (2026-06-22 13:45:54+00:00): Hola, gracias por contribuir con el mapa!
Revisé el conjunto de cambios. Quedó un nodo de interpolación en la vía highway de la calle Buchardo, lo cual no es correcto. Lo separé y acomodé otros segmentos y el edificio en base a las imágenes fuente.
Cualquier consulta en Telegram: osm_ar.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184428395
BCNorwich (2026-06-23 05:33:15+00:00): These highways (unjoined to any network) look to be fictional. Can you give a reason for mapping them? If not, they ought to be removed.
faraz_munj (2026-06-23 08:18:13+00:00): Yes, its graffiti
BCNorwich (2026-06-23 08:37:40+00:00): OK, thanks for removing it.
Regards Bernard
asaga s (2026-06-22 14:45:05+00:00): 間違えたので、リバートお願いします
asaga s (2026-06-22 14:44:22+00:00): 間違えたのでリバートお願いします
asaga s (2026-06-22 14:43:30+00:00): 間違えたのでリバートお願いします。
opnwez6 (2026-06-22 12:04:19+00:00): Nicht Rennerod sondern Rehe
gmar5 (2026-06-22 14:55:15+00:00): I'd put the name on the outer, "long" way. The other one (which is the designated PRoW) is parallel to the street, so might not need one if treated as a pavement.
gmar5 (2026-06-22 14:59:33+00:00): Actually, probably on the path on the inner side of the pond. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1356162891

Is the current tagging correct? Sending bikes on the outer ring on what looks more like an informal grassy path seems strange.
limes11 (2026-06-23 06:52:21+00:00): Hallo Robert Skiba, 

diese Wege mit access=forestry;agricultural, wie sind die denn beschildert ? Das tagging ist ungewöhnlich.

Viele Grüße
Robert Skiba (2026-06-23 09:49:03+00:00): Das ist meines Wissens eigentlich das korrekte Tagging für das Schild 

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:Zusatzzeichen_1026-38_-_Land-_und_forstwirtschaftlicher_Verkehr_frei_(450x600),_StVO_1992.svg

Zumindest im Kreis Ahrweiler, den ich größtenteils betreue, ist dieses Schild an allen Zufahrten zu Waldgebieten und somit müssten eigentlich alle Waldwege so getaggt sein. Ich hatte jedoch noch nicht die Gelegenheit, dies durchzuführen.

Falls ich mich irre, gerne kommentieren.
Robert Skiba (2026-06-23 09:56:21+00:00): Nachtrag: 
motor_vehicle=agricultural;forestry
dürfte eigentlich der richige Tag sein, denn Fahrrädern ist der Zugang ebenso wie Fußgängern und Pferden immer genehmigt. Siehst du das Auch so.
limes11 (2026-06-23 11:00:48+00:00): Die Frage ist, welches Schild über dem 1026-38 hängt, also das eigentliche Verbotsschild. Ist das ein VZ 250 ? VZ 260 ?
Robert Skiba (2026-06-23 11:26:20+00:00): Das dürfte m.E. relativ egal sein. In der Regel stellen die das VZ 260 auf. Ebenso ist das übrigens hier bei der Straße in Quiddelbach, da dort sogar der offizielle Radweg lang geht.
limes11 (2026-06-23 12:22:01+00:00): Dann ist es ein motor_vehicle=agricultural;forestry ohne weitere foot/horse/bicycle/access-tags

Bei einem VZ 250 wäre es vehicle=agricultural;forestry, was Fahrräder ausschließt. Oft wissen Gemeinden dies nicht und selten wird ein Fahrradverbot tatsächlich bewusst verhängt. Zu diesem Thema gab es bereits viele Diskussion. Manche taggen gemäß OTG nur das, was vor Ort zu sehen ist, andere ergänzen ein bicycle=yes um die wenigstens das Radrouting zu gewährleisten. Nachfragen bei den Gemeinden hilft in manchen Fällen. Remagen hat auf meine Mails noch nie reagiert, anderswo hatte ich durchaus Feedback bekommen. 

In jedem Fall sollte das access entsprechend ersetzt werden
Marvk (2026-06-25 17:14:47+00:00): I'm not going to list them all, but this also broke a bunch of relations, with, for example, bus routes going the wrong direction on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/314226288

Some tags were already corrected by other users.
pitfire (2026-06-23 09:38:43+00:00): Hallo MountMapper

was auch immer Dich zu diesem Änderungssatz bewegt hat steht außerhalb der üblichen Erfassungsregeln und spiegelt nicht die realen Bedingungen vor Ort wieder. 

https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=184429696#20/50.79794/7.21526

Es handelt sich weiterhin einen „higway=mini_roundebout“
nach den Regeln:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmini_roundabout

Bitte vollständig revertieren 

MfG pitfire
hsc666 (2026-06-23 16:42:58+00:00): Den CS habe ich komplett zurückgesetzt. Nicht nur aufgrund des fehlerhaften Tagging für den Kreisverkehr, sondern auch weil einige Geometrien beschädigt wurden.

Zudem fällt auf, dass Du (MountMapper) nicht nur in diesem CS, sondern noch in vielen weiteren sehr kreativ beim Erfinden nicht vorhandener baulicher Trennungen bist und dabei jeweils auch noch grobe handwerkliche Fehler einbaust.

Magst Du vielleicht erklären, was der Hintergrund all dieser Änderungen ist?
MountMapper (2026-06-25 16:32:34+00:00): Hi pitfire and hsc666. OSM contributor Zrop has also reached out to me about this changeset via direct message, and we had a discussion.
 
It was a misinterpretation from my end. After a refresher review on roundabouts, I understand and acknowledge my mistake. I will be more careful in my future edits.
 
Thank you for reaching out to me on this matter.
hsc666 (2026-06-28 09:48:02+00:00): Thanks for your response. However, it remains unclear what these changes are supposed to achieve. 

Your changes are consistently full of the same technical errors. 

I just picked out your last four CSs as examples and added comments to each one. Other mappers have already commented on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184431627 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5357407. 

Please review the errors and correct them there and in all previous CSs! Otherwise, the changes unfortunately won’t contribute to improving the data.
dzamper (2026-06-30 20:06:51+00:00): Cześć,
dzięki że moje poprzednie komentarze cię nie zraziły :) Parę sugestii jeszcze:

Tagi dostępu typu bicycle=, foot= etc. — generalnie trzeba ustawiać tylko jeśli są inne niż z by to wynikało z ogólnych przepisów, jak jest ścieżka leśna to można domniemywać że można się po niej poruszać pieszo bez konieczności dodawania żadnych dodatkowych tagów. Nie ma co marnować na to niepotrzebnie energii

motor_vehicle=permit ustawiłeś — po pierwsze znak B-1 dotyczy wszystkich pojazdów, nie tylko silnikowych, po drugie =permit stosujemy tylko jeśli zezwolenia są wydawane rutynowo, jak jest tabliczka „nie dotyczy pojazdów służb miejskich” to zdecydowanie nikt nie dostaje rutynowo na życzenie zezwolenia na zostanie pojazdem służb miejskich :) vehicle=private + bicycle=yes które było wcześniej było odpowiednie

Usunąłeś przypadkiem jakiś węzeł i cały las zniknął z mapy. Poprawiłem w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184875046
Uralla (2026-06-23 06:43:39+00:00): 👍
Fidelis Assis (2026-07-15 14:58:45+00:00): Hi Aleksandar,

Unfortunately, you fixed a fake relation created by user GabiruX_ - the municipality "Laje de Muriaé do Sul" does not exist, nor does the "do Norte" version. He was banned after making numerous fake and incorrect edits.
Since we will need to revert his edits, I believe it will be necessary to revert yours before his, is that okay?
Aleksandar Matejevic (2026-07-23 09:54:42+00:00): Sorry for the late response, I see that you have removed fake relation. Thanks
FreshlyTweezed (2026-07-16 18:17:18+00:00): This building has been demolished. Please reference up to date imagery
Sharko_MV3 (2026-06-23 12:38:47+00:00): Et pourquoi faire un changeset aussi vaste ?
eggie (2026-06-22 15:09:25+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback noexit=yes kan beter weg. Dat klopt niet.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
DaveF (2026-06-23 11:24:29+00:00): Welcome to OSM. 

Unsure what this is meant to represent. There is already a railway station & this entity is nowhere near it.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12777972120#map=19/51.074731/-1.818107
DaveF (2026-06-23 12:17:01+00:00): Why have you amended this entity? 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12806458041/history/4
DaveF (2026-06-23 12:18:23+00:00): Why have you amended this entity? 
It was correct previously.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/309103173
DaveF (2026-06-23 12:20:26+00:00): This looks like nonsense/vandalism to me.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5110020848/history/6
vng_me (2026-06-24 22:55:43+00:00): Why place=country? It is "state", no?
FajrAl (2026-06-25 02:04:04+00:00): provinsi gunakan place=state
hsc666 (2026-06-28 09:46:55+00:00): follow up from https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184431627 discussion

after adding new highway # of lanes is wrong on both. change:lanes is wrong. all destination tags are wrong. tunr:lanes is wrong. new road is missing in existing relations. give way sign is placed on wrong highway. missing turn restriction.
unenTT (2026-07-08 14:24:29+00:00): Hi hsc666, thank you for your feedback and clear explanations on what went wrong. We are looking at the issues to carry out the necessary fixes, also addressing the matter internally to make sure our organised editing team contributes to high-quality, accurate data to OpenStreetMap going forward.
Christopher (2026-06-27 07:34:41+00:00): If you split ways per directionn please aware of the turn:lanes, destination keys and bus+detour route relations. I've correct them.
You also duplicated the cycleway which was already corrected.
unenTT (2026-07-08 13:54:41+00:00): Hi Christopher, thank you for your feedback and clear explanations on what went wrong. We are looking at the issues to carry out the necessary fixes, also addressing the matter internally to make sure our organised editing team contributes to high-quality, accurate data to OpenStreetMap going forward.
qstep (2026-07-12 14:28:32+00:00): A körforgalom hozzáadásával eltörtél egy csomó buszútvonal kapcsolatot. Javítottam: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185594249
Frans S (2026-06-25 10:28:30+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Your mappings are accurate.
Please verify that the required offset is in place.
Best regards and keep mapping
ivandhfr (2026-06-22 13:32:49+00:00): Sumber data? Bagaimana Anda tau semua tower berikut adalah mobile phone dan semua konstruksinya berupa lattice?
FajrAl (2026-06-22 13:56:26+00:00): Saya gunakan overpass untuk menemukan `tower:type=communication` memastikan fungsinya untuk seluler/komunikasi dan `man_made` selain `mast.` Untuk konstruksi tipe lattice baru sebatas asumsi karena menara BTS tipenya lattice.
ivandhfr (2026-06-22 14:57:15+00:00): Masalahnya tidak semua tower adalah tower seluler. Ada beberapa yang saya tambahkan sengaja tidak diberi tag pelengkap seperti `communication:*` karena memang masih tanda tanya.

Sementara untuk value `tower:construction` itu sebelumnya sudah disurvey dan tidak semua BTS itu lattice.
FajrAl (2026-06-22 15:01:51+00:00): Ah baik. Saya akan coba pulihkan
hsc666 (2026-06-28 09:45:58+00:00): follow up from https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184431627 discussion

after adding new highway # of lanes is wrong on both. no u-turn on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13957834357 could be added. new road is missing in existing relation.
unenTT (2026-07-08 14:15:37+00:00): Hi hsc666, thank you for your feedback and clear explanations on what went wrong. We are looking at the issues to carry out the necessary fixes, also addressing the matter internally to make sure our organised editing team contributes to high-quality, accurate data to OpenStreetMap going forward.
lukabułka (2026-06-22 17:20:48+00:00): to nie Skarżysko tylko Zagórze