piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
joost schouppe (2025-07-28 08:10:44+00:00): A "hopital de jour" is by definition not an amenity=hospital, but an amenity=clinic (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dhospital). I'll fix it.
Patchanka (2025-08-08 16:03:21+00:00): bonjour

merci pour l'ajout du trottoir partagé. Par contre j'ai modifié un peu, car il ne faut pas indiquer de nom si l’objet n'en a pas ("trottoir partagé" n'est pas un nom mais une description). Également pensez à raccorder le tracé à d'autres voies sinon aucun calculateur d'itinéraire ne pourra vous faire passer par là.

Quelques infos de base ici : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/images/8/87/Les_10_cOSMandements.pdf

Et si vous avez des questions n'hésitez pas à visiter le forum pour en discuter :-) https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/

bonne soirée
Yunkers (2025-07-04 17:38:25+00:00): Ale dlaczego przy okazji zmieniłeś motorway_link?
szalona_entropia (2025-07-04 20:04:14+00:00): Bo to nie jest link, tylko ciąg dalszy Alei Wojska Polskiego.
Beau Jonckers (2025-07-06 20:34:55+00:00): Hallo Map47,
Thanks for noticing my mistake and improvement. I made some wrong clicks. It seems that you are systematically searching an area in OSMI or something like that. Do you know if it is possible to integrate OSMI into OSM so that errors can be found immediately. OSM itself does not give an error message. Thanks in advance.
Map47 (2025-07-07 13:29:59+00:00): Hi Beau Jonckers,
Yes I actually check the OSMI reports related to the areas.
For example like in this area:
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=7.86430&lat=46.41314&zohttps://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=7.86430&lat=46.41314&zoom=9&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.71&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cwaysom=9&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.71&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple
On this page you can check the outcome of your work in OSM.
https://hdyc.neis-one.org/?Beau%20Jonckers
The reports that will be attributed to you, however, are not necessarily up to you and are deferred anyway.
Happy mapping
Beau Jonckers (2025-07-08 18:51:20+00:00): Hey Map47,
Thanks for the links. It would be nice to integrate that kind of information directly into OSM. I don't always check OSMI afterwards. I can imagine that there are more fun things for other mappers than checking areas and things of other people. On the map itself it does not realy look 'wrong'  but maybe thats because I look at it just from the OSM map and with ID. If you dont like to fix my mistakes than you could always send a message. or put a note on the map.  But maybe you do like to fix these things.  I btw need fix some small things in the vicinity but thats a different topic. Anyways. Thanks for the links and if you have other tips than I would love to hear them too. You too happy mapping
abhumbla (2025-07-05 07:23:29+00:00): this edit is incorrect, your imagery is out of date. the bike lanes on Valencia are side running now. you should revert, or somebody else will
ihorkovtun_lyft (2025-07-07 11:52:25+00:00): Hello Abhumbla,
Thank you for bringing this issue to our attention. I did some more research. I found out that you are right. I’ve reverted my edits to the previous version in this changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168594768
I apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused, and I appreciate your help in improving the map.
Best regards,
Ihor
Jarek 🚲 (2026-01-05 18:22:45+00:00): Hello,

FYI I am discussing this edit on the community forum: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mapping-lanes-separated-by-tram-platform-as-separate-ways/140095
grawat_Lyft (2026-01-14 05:53:58+00:00): Hi Jarek,
We have made the necessary edits in this changeset. Let me know if any issues occur further.

Happy Mapping!
Thanks,
Gaurav
grawat_Lyft (2026-01-14 06:49:37+00:00): here is the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177034539#map=15/43.59410/-79.52759&layers=N
user_5359 (2025-07-05 11:31:13+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1412180480. What is the mean of the tag "batiment sans toi "= "yes"? There is also the notation "batiment sans toit", "Batiment sans toit".
dannmer (2025-07-04 11:36:34+00:00): added community center
NeisBot (2025-07-04 11:57:48+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-07-18 04:59:01+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/168483001
yelisey90 (2025-08-01 13:18:04+00:00): mostly reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169818013 : it has been agreed that road leading to apartment buildings cannot be called driveways; the entrance is not to some staircase, but a main entrance to the building
mike moro (2025-09-09 12:45:54+00:00): Thanks! Got it, didn't know that.
gurglypipe (2025-07-04 13:05:17+00:00): Heya, wrt https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3071545092, mapping a cattle grid and adjacent gate as one node is a pattern which National Trust have been using quite a lot in their recent edits to add walking routes in the area.

If it’s something which you think should be strongly avoided, you might want to drop user NTTrailsLSE a message and work out an alternate tagging scheme with them. :)
phodgkin (2025-07-07 16:32:26+00:00): I made some comments about weird double tagging on this changeset
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167817988

For instance, `tourism=artwork` had been changed to `tourism=attraction;artwork` which is just wrong and shows a poor understanding of tagging. Do they not see that the retagged object disappears from the map?

I am tempted to bring this up for discussion in the UK discussion forum if I don't get a reply.
gurglypipe (2025-07-07 16:51:51+00:00): Thanks 👍
Fan map 2 (2025-10-03 16:53:53+00:00): Nieuzasadnione skasowanie kościoła. Wycofane w https://osm.org/changeset/172801509
eggie (2025-07-04 14:04:40+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Udarian (2025-07-04 22:49:03+00:00): why did you remove the wikidata and Wikipedia links as they seem to be correct.
VictorIE (2025-07-10 22:27:00+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12977374578

I've never seen one of these before, but I strongly suspect:

man_made=monitoring_station
monitoring:water=yes

What type of monitoring, I don't know.
VictorIE (2025-07-10 22:51:27+00:00): It seems to be National Water Monitoring Station RS15B020300. 

I can't find other details, but this background map might be familiar: http://www.epa.ie/hydronet
George Sears (2025-07-04 21:47:30+00:00): Ciao, quando riscontri delle attività sulla mappa che hanno chiuso in realtà, è meglio non eliminare completamente il nodo, piuttosto eliminaci tutte le informazioni relative all'attività e lascia solo le informazioni relative all'indirizzo così ci rimane come informazione la posizione di tale indirizzo
Vedi anche la wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused:shop
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dvacant
muralito (2025-07-04 22:54:39+00:00): Hola Fernando. Lo que hiciste de los limites en algunos puntos de puente y rio esta mal. Puente y rio no tienen que compartir nodo. Por algo estaba como estaba.
muralito (2025-07-04 22:57:25+00:00): Va ejemplo: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9759838989
FacundoCaceres (2025-07-07 11:54:39+00:00): Hola muralito, mi nombre es Facundo. Gracias por tu comentario, lo tendré en cuenta en futuras ediciones.
muralito (2025-07-07 20:25:42+00:00): Disculpame, tengo un conocido que se llama asi y se me paso sin querer.
bartgron (2025-07-05 06:44:01+00:00): Nie używamy OpenStreetMap do wprowadzania fikcji.
Wycofano: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168510536
Syl (2025-07-04 14:03:51+00:00): Bonjour, si le garage existe toujours sous un autre nom il n'y a pas à le supprimer. Il vaut mieux enlever les infos plus à jour et éventuellement mettre les nouvelles si vous les avez.
Je peux m'occuper d'annuler la suppression si vous me confirmez qu'il y a toujours un garage ici.
TeamDELKO (2025-07-07 15:08:41+00:00): Hello again,

Désolé ! 

Nouveau garage : 

AUTOS PNEUS SERVICES
ZC AVON
13120 GARDANNE	
04 42 51 51 21
Syl (2025-07-07 17:10:23+00:00): Merci pour ces détails, j'ai annulé la suppression et j'ai enlevé les infos qui concernaient Delko.
TeamDELKO (2025-07-08 07:28:01+00:00): Génial !
Gregory Peony (2025-07-11 16:30:57+00:00): I flagged a few footprints that look like they envelope multiple buildings. I mapped some of these in chageset 168805126 so you can see my interpretation. ---Take care to not include the walls of buildings in the size and shape of the footprint in Bing the NE walls of some buildings are visible. aquire the footprint by tracing the roof and move it to the base of the buildings. It's generally more accurate to map footprints slightly smaller than the roof of buildings where it likley extends beyond the walls. Hope this helpful.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168485385
Syl (2025-07-04 14:02:03+00:00): Bonjour, si le garage existe toujours sous un autre nom il n'y a pas à le supprimer. Il vaut mieux enlever les infos plus à jour et éventuellement mettre les nouvelles si vous les avez.
TeamDELKO (2025-07-07 14:58:07+00:00): Bonjour,

Merci pour le retour et les précisions !
Désolé je ne savais pas si c'était mieux de supprimer ou de mettre à jour les infos. je le ferai pour les autres garages.
TeamDELKO (2025-07-07 15:09:46+00:00): Nouveau garage : 

CARLIYANA	
29 IMPASSE DE GARONNE		
47200 ST PARDOUX DU BREUIL	
05 53 76 09 30
Syl (2025-07-07 17:18:50+00:00): Merci pour ces précisions et pour la prise en compte de ma remarque. Je ne vais pas annuler la suppression de celui-ci, il a l'air d'être en liquidation judiciaire : https://annuaire-entreprises.data.gouv.fr/annonces/914740824

N'hésitez pas à me signaler si il y a d'autres suppression à annuler en plus des 4 que j'ai remarqué.
TeamDELKO (2025-07-08 07:30:13+00:00): Merci Syl. Normalement j'ai effectué des recherches "DELKO + nomville" des garages fermés et il n'y avait que ces 4 là.

J'abuse peut être mais je tente : j'ai créé un sujet sur le forum, dans "Contributions" car je cherche l'aide de quelqu'un pour effectuer des modifications en masse (DELKO -> Delko, moyens de paiement, building=retail...) bref je lance un appel à l'aide !
NeisBot (2025-07-04 13:21:49+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-07-18 04:58:18+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/169037242
AndersAndersson (2025-07-04 23:12:54+00:00): Hej!
Är du säker på spänningen på KL55? Jag har för mig jag läste det någonstans innan jag lade in det. Det är ovanligt hög spänning (med min ringa kunskap), det är därför jag kommer ihåg det.
MacksX (2025-07-07 06:35:20+00:00): I vardagligt tal så säger man 130kV men YT55 Hedemora och egentligen all utgående 130 från RT24 Horndal ner till Västerås har systemspänning på 132kV "alla YT stationer". Samma sak på 70 nätet, det är egentligen 72kV. Ska jag ändra tillbaka så det ser snyggare ut?
AndersAndersson (2025-07-09 03:52:42+00:00): Det kan ju vara att det stod att den klarade max 138 kV, men att man ändå kör mer normala 132 kV.
Jag har ingen koll på vad man faktiskt kör i ledningarna. 132 kV ser ju mer normalt ut, så för mig behöver du inte ändra tillbaka,
eggie (2025-07-04 14:02:02+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback  Deze locatie was als clinic getagd. Ik denk omdat deze toch wel wat kleiner is dan Zwijndrecht. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dclinic

In Zwijndrecht kun je wel een nachtje overblijven. Dacht alleen niet in het weekend. 

en

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dhospital
Formeel zou het een ziekenhuis zijn, maar ik denk voornamelijk polikliniek. 

Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
joost schouppe (2025-07-28 08:17:03+00:00): De wiki is hier vrij duidelijk over: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dhospital
Als er enkel dagopname is, dan is het een clinic, geen hospital. Als het elders ook fout is, dan moet het gewoon elders ook gefixed worden.
Vinber (2025-08-21 15:48:02+00:00): building=dormitory n'est psa un node, j'ai transféré sur la surface de l'ensemble du batiment, suite à cette note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4871759
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2025-08-22 06:35:23+00:00): Merci de votre alerte

Cordialement,
L'Equipe DB
dknelson9876 (2025-07-06 00:46:15+00:00): Hi technicat,
Thanks for all of your work on POIs in SLCo. As you do so, please make sure that your future edits conform to local naming conventions (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Utah/Naming_Conventions) and OSM conventions for expanding abbreviations. In this case, rather than

- addr:housenumber="1835 W"
- addr:street="3600 South"

use 

- addr:housenumber="1835"
- addr:street="West 3600 South"
user_22243282 (2025-07-06 00:59:51+00:00): OK, thanks for the info and link. I'll try to conform to the convention, but it seems to me (I've just lived here two years, so I'm getting used to the street system here) that local usage here is to bundle the direction with the street number (the street system here is very planned and numbered like lat/long so an east west street runs all the way east and west with no break, unlike, say, Las Vegas where the streets often just end), and also the openstreetmap web UI does not include the direction in the street completion menu (so initially I tended to forget to include the direction at all).
dknelson9876 (2025-07-18 15:33:32+00:00): You are right that as a local if I were to read the full address out loud I'd put a pause after 'West' instead of before, pairing it with the house number instead of the street. Unfortunately, since that cardinal direction is not usually signed on the street sign or on buildings, it doesn't have an obvious home according to typical OSM conventions. However, the local conventions linked above follow the patterns used by most local GIS departments, so that's we've settled on for now. I'm working on a proposal to put forward to the larger OSM community eventually to get more proper support in other OSM based software.
eggie (2025-07-04 15:51:54+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Srdjan023 (2025-07-06 20:42:23+00:00): Da li je ovaj blok greška https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9805684702 ?
German C (2025-12-05 14:26:54+00:00): Hola Lolj, no debes eliminar los nodos de escuela para luego crear un área nueva de escuela ya que se pierde el historial de los nodos, en el siguiente link https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Mantener_el_historial#T%C3%A9cnicas_de_edici%C3%B3n se describe la técnica para convertir de nodo a área, el área que eliminaste https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/680247686 contenía datos como nombre y descripción del sitio que ya no aparecen en la vista actual del mapa ¿por que lo eliminaste? (https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=168488136 (en rojo se resalta los nodos y área que eliminaste)
jeslop (2025-07-27 16:34:27+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169568931
jb54osm (2025-07-04 18:31:06+00:00): Nav jouw opmerking: Liguster 202 is het adres van het managementkantoor van de Mall. Allerlei (nieuwe) zaken worden daar al dan niet tijdelijk aan opgehangen.
lyctkel (2025-07-04 18:58:43+00:00): Dat verklaart dit vreemde adres. Bedankt voor de tip.
German C (2025-12-05 14:11:52+00:00): Hola Lolj, no entiendo por que pudiste modificar la geometría de la notaria y el edificio de tránsito y transporte, pero en los otros edificios no les modificaste la geometria en vez de eso los eliminaste y luego los volviste a crear https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=168488620 (en rojo brillante están los edificios eliminados y en rojo oscuro los edificios que modificaste) , a eliminar sin un análisis previo se pierde el historial https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Mantener_el_historial, por ejemplo la alcaldía que eliminaste era la cuarta versión donde intervinieron tres personas diferentes a lo largo de 6 años, pero pueden haber otros edificios o áreas o carreteras que pueden tener mucha mas historia.
Frans S (2025-07-07 14:17:31+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
Please don't connect nodes of a highway with nodes of land use areas.
These are errors which need to be solved.
If you have the validation tool installed in JOSM and used, you get a warning about these issues.
Best regards
German C (2025-12-05 13:52:49+00:00): Hola Lolj, ¿por que eliminaste el ancianato y luego creaste uno nuevo? https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=168488746 (en rojo se resalta lo que eliminaste) el ancianato que fue eliminado tenia todas las etiquetas haciendo las descripciones detalladas de las características del sitio, tu lo que hiciste fue borrar el ancianato, crear uno nuevo y poner solo algunas etiquetas, lo correcto es mejorar la geometría y no debes eliminar etiquetas si no las entiendes https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenas_pr%C3%A1cticas#No_eliminar_etiquetas_que_no_comprendas
NeisBot (2025-07-04 14:56:46+00:00): Hi Arfonso, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Added and modified roads, including creation of tertiary link and stop highway tags, with some node adjustments."

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish #AIgenerated
jeslop (2025-07-27 16:34:28+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169568931
martinst (2025-07-06 06:22:22+00:00): Hallo Andi00787,
wieso hast Du Way 775806625 und 775806626 gelöscht? Die Fahrwege sind im Luftbild eindeutig zu erkennen.

Wie sind die Fahrwege Way 46932677, 185504383 usw. bei denen Du access=private ergänzt hast vor Ort beschildert? 
In OSM werden nur Dinge eingetragen, die für jeden vor Ort so zu erkennen sind ("On-the-ground-rule"), ob jemand Eigentümer ist spielt hier keine Rolle.
martinst (2025-07-10 05:13:51+00:00): Nochmals zur Funktionsweise von OSM: Du kannst als Eigentümer einschränkende Beschilderung aufstellen, die dann anschließend in OSM erfasst wird.
Revertiert in Changeset: 168723390.
b-jazz (2025-07-05 05:09:23+00:00): RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1412242875

As I explained a couple of months ago in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166523141, you can't intersect golf features like fairways and greens. That is invalid mapping and sets up Q/A tools and needs to be corrected and avoided in the future. Please read the previous comments and reach out if you have any questions. Thanks.
Kovoschiz (2025-07-04 18:13:22+00:00): 0. Please don't use such comments. It should be descriptive and self-contained. 
1. Please be careful when panning. There's a dragged point here. Junctions, bridges, roads, geodetic control stations shouldn't not be intersected and attached to each other as they are separate. 
2. Please don't use such `name=` , which is for proper names only. At most add `fixme=` and `note=` only. You can right-click to "add a note here" to let others edit if you don't know what to use.
notmyproblem1 (2025-07-06 16:55:33+00:00): ciao caro, i civici vanno all'entrata della building e non sulla building, 

buon mapping!
German C (2025-12-05 13:44:59+00:00): Hola Lolj, no se debe eliminar el parque,  la iglesia que fueron creados en el 2019, ni el banco https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=168489142 (en rojo se resalta lo que tu eliminaste), lo que se debe hacer es mejorar sus geometrías haciendo modificación, no eliminación y luego creación, ya que se debe mantener el historial https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Mantener_el_historial
German C (2025-12-05 13:40:18+00:00): Hola Lolj, no se deben eliminar edificios que fueron creados en el 2019 y luego volverlos a crear ya que se debe mantener el historial https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Mantener_el_historial
totera (2025-07-05 11:14:30+00:00): Sai per davvero che sono due strade senza uscita e che non si tratta di una strada che passa sotto una tettoia?
f_gonella (2025-07-05 13:59:24+00:00): Corretto, grazie per la segnalazione
jeslop (2025-07-27 16:34:29+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169568931
jeslop (2025-07-27 16:34:30+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169568931
kornad (2025-07-07 06:09:09+00:00): Czy na pewno zasadne jest usunięcie planowanej Nowej Kielnieńskiej i Nowej Spacerowej? Nawet jeśli miasto nie ma w tej chwili finansowania na ich realizację to są one wpisane w każdy możliwy dokument planistyczny i strategie miejskie (nawet te najnowsze), także według mnie zasadnym jest zostawienie tych dróg jako proposed.
theDM (2025-07-07 06:22:16+00:00): Te drogi nie powinny być mapowane na takim etapie zgodnie z definicją https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:highway%3Dproposed drogi proposed. Nie ma info, czy powstaną i czy na pewno w takim przebiegu. Planowany łącznik Kielnieńska - węzeł "Chwaszczyno" plus spadek natężenia ruchu tym bardziej oddalają szansę na Nową Kielnieńską.
Nawet anglojęzyczna globalna definicja https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=proposed określa takie drogi problematycznymi i ogólnie mało gdzie się takie drogi mapuje.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-09-09 12:20:19+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1075379963/history has maxspeed = 0 that was added in this edit
what maxspeed=0 is supposed to mean? If moving for vehicles (or some of them) is not allowed, then maybe one of access tags should be used and maxspeed=0 is not needed?
fudoreaper (2025-09-09 17:52:09+00:00): Hi, thanks for your comment. I didn't know editors could make comments comments on changesets.
Tagging "maxspeed=0" is an error, likely i meant to tag 30. However, this is not an actual lane, this is just disused property. maybe we should call it an informal path
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-09-12 14:54:31+00:00): Thanks for a quick fix!

And congrats on following up on comment, especially if you were unaware they exist at all!
user_5359 (2025-07-05 13:38:01+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/4610155951. What ist the mean of the tag iti:ref = IC:74710036 ? Did you mean ref:iti ?