piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
chnuessli (2025-12-17 15:10:23+00:00): I deleted defibrillator:location as well because that was not the correct location.
Vinber-Pro (2025-12-17 14:44:13+00:00): Salut,
les adresses ne sont pas nécessaires, sauf cas très particulier.

à plus
eggie (2025-12-17 11:44:12+00:00): Dag dieudonneblijd39393

Wat is je bedoeling. Boter kaas en eieren?
Wat is je bedoeling.
Diy zijn je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=176045589

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-12-17 11:46:21+00:00): Reverted by changeset #176046628

Je edits zijn teruggedraaid.
eggie (2025-12-17 11:48:24+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Wellicht beter bij het HOT maps project blijven. Realiseer je dat al je wijzigingen daadwerkelijk op de wereldkaart komen. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Pikse (2026-02-13 11:47:49+00:00): These are historical names and were already given more properly using old_name:de key.

See also previous comment here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175082756

I'll revert this change.
the_third_man (2025-12-17 13:42:29+00:00): "Aussenstandort beim Schopf Hintereingang Schulhaus" this is not a description, this is the detail location. please change.
the_third_man (2025-12-17 13:43:06+00:00): operator=24/7???
chnuessli (2025-12-17 15:14:08+00:00): done
spiregrain (2025-12-17 11:31:26+00:00): actually, not from survey, from NLS - OS 1:1,250/1:2,500 National Grid maps, 1947-1963
confusedbuffalo (2025-12-18 10:40:07+00:00): Hi, are you saying that the library is not active? If so then we wouldn't really map it.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1459277814
Grass-snake (2025-12-19 21:03:59+00:00): Здравствуйте, подскажите, для Вас принципиальна последовательность названий (улица Магистральная, улица Набережная, улица Озёрная, улица Парковая, улица Торговая, улица Ямальская)? Я бы хотел вернуть как было.
TrickyFoxy (2026-01-01 18:54:48+00:00): вернул
bartgron (2025-12-18 06:48:17+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
Supaplex030 (2025-12-19 13:34:48+00:00): Eigentlich ist "footway=sidewalk" auf solchen Abschnitten korrekt, also auch wenn sie nicht "parallel" sind: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/how-to-tag-sidewalk-stubs/119025

Falls es bei der Datenprozessierung stört, wäre es also perspektivisch besser eine andere Lösung zu finden ;)
BBJIB (2025-12-19 10:35:40+00:00): Hi! Thanks a lot for your contributions. Please keep in mind to keep your changes local, and to upload your changes before you move on to another region/country/continent. This makes it easier to keep track of and review edits. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset
Have fun mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176046116
Flavius Belisarius (2026-01-25 08:42:51+00:00): Thanks for letting me know, I will keep that in mind for future submissions! I am still a beginner in this.
LordGarySugar (2026-01-25 20:28:54+00:00): Hi, thanks for your contributions! I've just had a look  through your edits, please make sure if you add new roads they don't overlap existing roads or tracks, and are connected wherever they cross/have junctions. I've just made some corrections to adjust the new road you added, thanks. Happy mapping!
DressyPear4 (2025-12-17 12:54:50+00:00): Olá, para linhas de energia com tensões 220/380V ou 13800 kv use "minor_line"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176046560
smallCat (2025-12-26 09:30:51+00:00): 中国西藏请使用汉藏双语进行标注，已于https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176422901回退

Please use both Chinese and Tibetan language for the map of Tibet, China. This has been reverted to the previous version at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176422901.
kitsee (2025-12-26 13:55:22+00:00): the documented China specific naming rules state that `name` should contain only the Chinese name and the tibetan name should only be in the `name:bo` tag

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multilingual_names#China
bkleipool (2025-12-17 12:14:00+00:00): *RWY06
literan (2025-12-17 19:06:38+00:00): не надо дубли делать, вы уже нанесли эту "пекарнюдонербистро" один раз
AnteŽunić (2025-12-17 12:07:01+00:00): According source:hgv tags were added o changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176005266
vmicho (2025-12-18 14:37:23+00:00): Hi there. Why are you destroying routing again? Yopu did this already TWICE! Some kind of map sabotage?
I've already fixed the routing here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175955864

I cannot even test the new design (routers take a week to update) before you destroy it.
vmicho (2025-12-25 22:46:01+00:00): Hello there?
ALu68 (2025-12-31 14:36:12+00:00): You should be careful with your choice of words.

What are these insinuations?

" ... you destroying routing again ..."
"... map sabotage ..."
"... you destroy it ..."

You should read this: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_map_for_the_router
ALu68 (2025-12-31 14:39:31+00:00): If your router is not working, then improve your router. Do not manipulate the road layout.

These router are working fine:

https://classic-maps.openrouteservice.org/directions?n1=48.376519&n2=10.887762&n3=18&a=48.375913,10.888625,48.375354,10.886424&b=0&c=0&k1=en-US&k2=km

https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_car&route=48.375765%2C10.888411%3B48.375323%2C10.886673#map=18/48.376535/10.887776&layers=N
vmicho (2026-01-24 09:03:04+00:00): Hi. Sorry for late reply, I was a bit off after holiday :D

Nope, that 1st router is not working correctly neither (try the from N to SW or SE routes). Also like mostly none of the routes working right now.
There is nothing wrong arranging roads a bit to make more sense to computers. Especially you have to avoid phantom turns (i.e. create geometric turns where they are not) especially at crossroads with different types of roads.
Or, what I see most often, a major/minor road split when optically (like here) they seem to be same -> the less major road is treated as an exit (which is 50% a legitimate interpretation). The fix is to have temporarily same level of roads at the intersection ...

I'll try another simple fix.
vmicho (2026-01-24 09:04:28+00:00): PS: there is no perfect solution for everything. I go for a kind of compromise between look and routing.
vmicho (2026-01-24 09:11:43+00:00): Change here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177638131

will test that in few days when routers are updated ...
This creates an equal split at the cplit point https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13381120019
vmicho (2026-01-24 09:13:25+00:00): PS: just for clarification: One should expect a keep-left / keep-right routing when goinf N->SW or N->SE, at that point. Which is what you physically see when there.
AnteŽunić (2025-12-17 12:11:06+00:00): According source:hgv tag was added to changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176006872
bkleipool (2025-12-17 12:13:47+00:00): *RWY24
eggie (2025-12-17 12:25:11+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback Alle begin is moeilijk.
Zo te zien ligt het gebouw nu uit het lood. Adresnode 16 b heb je verschoven naar een ander pand.
De tagging in OSM is UK English  
Nv bij cuisine..  friture;lunch;ijscoupes;terras
Dat laatste  kun je niet eten.
outdoor_seating=yes is de tagging voor terras.

Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=176047873

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Rob8622 (2025-12-17 13:36:54+00:00): Hallo Eggie,

Bedankt voor je duidelijke uitleg en feedback.

Heb jij het nu aangepast of moet ik dat nog doen?

Groetjes, 

Rob
eggie (2025-12-17 13:59:24+00:00): Dag Rob.. Ik heb het al aangepast. In achavi kun je zien hoe jij het had gemapt.

Mapse..
eggie
Rob8622 (2025-12-20 11:04:10+00:00): Dag Eggie,

Nu heb ik alleen een vraag..
We hebben de naam aangepast van cafetaria dennis naar cafetaria Biej de meule. 

Als ik ingelogd ben staat er de juiste naam maar op alle andere pagina's die openstreemap gebruiken staat nog steeds cafetaria dennis.

heeft dat een aantal dagen nodig of hoe gaat dat?

Groetjes,
Rob
eggie (2025-12-20 11:41:25+00:00): Hoi..

Op de standaardkaart zit vaak je cache nog in de weg. Dan CTRL-F5 paar keer toetsen. 
Andere layers zijn niet direct uptodate en dat kan wel een weekje of langer duren.
Dat geldt ook voor afgeleide apps als OSM en Komoot. Dan is het wachten doorgevoerde update. Dat verschilt.

Dus geduld :)

Groet,
eggie
Ruslan Fatih (2025-12-17 17:18:22+00:00): Не удаляйте места и дорожки
Ruslan Fatih (2025-12-17 17:20:27+00:00): Если вы будете удалять данные и создавать точно такие же от своего имени я буду присылать репорты на вандализм
blef (2025-12-18 17:45:49+00:00): Bonjour,
Si le rond-point ajouté est un giratoire (priorité sur le rond-point), il faudrait ajouter l'attribut junction=roundabout. De plus, si vous avez ajouté cet élément en tant que membre dans les relations, celui-ci doit être inséré dans l'ordre et non pas en fin de liste.
Je me préparais à rectifier moi-même, mais mon envoi déclenchait un conflit avec vos modifs ultérieures (CS176105263). Je vous laisse rectifier vous-même, ou bien je le ferais plus tard si vous n'intervenez plus sur le secteur.
Cordialement.
blef (2025-12-20 16:39:51+00:00): J'ai fait le nécessaire.
SIG_Ville_Anglet (2025-12-22 10:50:44+00:00): Bonjour,
Merci, pour vos corrections. Je vois vos messages que maintenant. Bonne journée.
empty_child (2025-12-17 20:38:59+00:00): Добрый день
Зачем вы удалили вторую ветку улицы?
addr: (2025-12-20 15:02:47+00:00): Там была нарисована дорога через кусты
empty_child (2025-12-20 19:24:36+00:00): В реальности там два моста с односторонним движением на каждом. Поверьте человеку, который там проводил выходные :)
Я откачу этот момент, остальное трогать не буду
empty_child (2025-12-20 19:27:24+00:00): Рекомендую аэрофото местного кадастра. Они (и не только) вам пригодятся, если Озон будет активно заходить на грузинский рынок. Feel free to contact local community, как говорится
addr: (2025-12-23 16:37:00+00:00): Ясно, вам видней если там бываете. 
У нас есть разрешение на использование этих аэрофото? Если есть, то не могли бы вы поделиться ссылкой?
empty_child (2025-12-23 17:55:56+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Georgia_Abkhazia_South-Ossetia#Geodata,_aerial_imagery,_etc.

https://nt0.napr.gov.ge/NGCache?x={x}&y={y}&z={z}&l=ORTHO_GEORGIA_4
empty_child (2025-12-23 17:57:59+00:00): Что-то все поломалось, еще раз

https://nt0.napr.gov.ge/NGCache?x={x}&y={y}&z={z}&l=ORTHO_GEORGIA_4
empty_child (2025-12-23 17:58:51+00:00): Так. Сокращатель ссылок сломан. В первых фигурных скобках про x должен быть
NeisBot (2025-12-17 19:37:29+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Hair salon in Rochester"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-24 14:25:01+00:00): Cleaned up remaining SEO spam and other tagging for POI in changeset 184526912

https://osm.org/changeset/184526912
vogelfreier (2026-06-16 18:15:08+00:00): Hi,
The task was to use the ‘building=yes/house’ value added by other users to the address node to map the building as a line, and not to make the same mistake as others by assigning a ‘building=..’ value to the node itself. The ‘building=..’ value on the node is not displayed.
Even though buildings have been springing up like mushrooms there in recent years, please take the time to trace them by hand.
Another tool for mapping is JOSM https://josm.openstreetmap.de/
Go to ‘Preferences’ – ‘Extensions’ – e.g. ‘buildings_tool’ ...
Regards, vogelfreier/Rüdiger
Translated with deepl.com
scott_mobile16 (2026-06-18 21:34:53+00:00): This is unfair & unclear criticism without a clear actionable solution. I converted house number 6 to a way. I also marked some nearby nodes as houses while I was there. Can you please explain, in words rather than subtext, why marking nodes as buildings is a mistake, rather than just assert that it's a mistake. And also please tell me what you want me to do about it. The comment about josm appears to be a non-sequitir.
Ewen Hill (2026-06-19 11:22:04+00:00): Hi Scott, 
  Thanks for mapping these and nothing is really wrong on your side so no sweat.

There are three basic types of geometry, the node (point), the line and the polygon (area). For houses, it is preferred to use the Polygon and trace the house. To square the sides of the polygon, use the q key when you have the building selected.

Better still if you are doing many house outlines, then try the editor https://rapideditor.org/ that guesses the houses from machine learning.

The address nodes is an important import from the VicGov and so I try avoid moving or editing these nodes. 99.5% are correct however they are related to the property and not the house. 

There are times you may use an address node like flats, shared industrial or commercial areas where you can't split the building area from imagery.

The reason not to touch the address node is that at some stage, the nodes will be refreshed and your edits may be overwritten or the node moved so just ignore these puppies.

Keep on mapping and thanks again -sorry for the long comment
vogelfreier (2026-06-22 17:03:35+00:00): To @scott_mobile16: A node with `building=…` is NOT processed or displayed on osm.org. This value is not visible to outsiders. Your task in MapRoulette was to change a building node into an area.  

You started the data entry process with the ID Editor. Editing is done directly online after logging in, and the changes are then saved. The JOSM I mentioned would then be the next step—or rather, the second step—as a powerful tool (it can be used offline for a short time with a limited amount of downloaded data).

Even though @Ewen Hill says you can use Rapid, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Rapid (just one of many OSM Wiki subpages), the focus is on the quality of the building data—specifically its orientation and whether a building actually exists there rather than being a fake—because they’ll certainly want to know if data was simply copied from there.

As for JOSM, a brief guide is available on their website along with the corresponding Java application. There’s a guide for this at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM. There’s also a how-to for building data entry with a video.

If the building was drawn based on one of the aerial photos—and assuming the others are aligned the same way—I can highlight that one building and draw several others parallel to it.

As for JOSM, there’s a brief guide on their website along with the corresponding Java application. You can find instructions for this at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM. There’s also a how-to guide on mapping buildings, complete with a video.

Once the building has been drawn using one of the aerial photos—assuming the others are aligned the same way—I can highlight that one building and draw several others parallel to it.

If this was done from the Ruhr region at around 7:00 p.m. with a room temperature of 30 degrees.

Translated using deepl.com
scott_mobile16 (2026-06-23 12:05:32+00:00): OK thanks mate.
Bask (2026-01-30 00:24:02+00:00): Na tym rondzie można bez problemu zawrócić, jest przejezdne (oprócz oczywiście Rzemieślniczej i Dąbrowskiego), dlaczego tutaj został ustawiony access=no?
Artur | Yanosik (2026-01-30 06:18:15+00:00): Dostawaliśmy zgłoszenia o ograniczonym przejeździe na tym rondzie i ślady GPS potwierdzały, że możliwy jest jedynie przejazd na wprost. Jeśli sytuacja się zmieniła, to wprowadzę poprawki.
Bask (2026-01-30 06:23:14+00:00): Nawet mogę dzisiaj nagrać przejazd tam :-D Boczne są zamknięte, a tam po prostu nikt nie zawraca, jakkolwiek jest to całkowicie możliwe.
Artur | Yanosik (2026-01-30 07:24:16+00:00): Dzięki za informację. Zmiany już wprowadzone :)
OSM-Contributer (2026-01-07 11:47:24+00:00): source "indianrailinfo.com" is incorrect. Correct spelling is "indiarailinfo.com" . "indiarailinfo.com" had been used not "indianrailinfo.com". Sorry for the inconvenience
eggie (2025-12-17 14:03:54+00:00): Dag Fonsrae..
Probeer bij te taggen op de bestaande adresnode.
Mvg
eggie
Norbert Wołowiec (2025-12-19 10:00:03+00:00): Wjazd na Kowanowską z DK11 został zlikwidowany.

https://www.facebook.com/photo?fbid=122163370394396859&set=pcb.122163370550396859
Dawid2849 (2025-12-19 11:48:33+00:00): Poprawiłem
Norbert Wołowiec (2025-12-19 12:41:09+00:00): Jedynie też w przyszłości będzie trzeba poprawić pewnie ten łącznik do ronda, bo ja go robiłem trochę na oko i ze zdjęć. takich z ziemi. Niestety w systemach informacji przestrzennych tez jeszcze nie naniesiona jest ta droga.
the_third_man (2025-12-17 13:37:50+00:00): access=private?
chnuessli (2025-12-17 15:12:46+00:00): for safety reasons i added this tag: be aware, access tag is recommended, not mandatory.
the_third_man (2025-12-18 09:39:03+00:00): I see it differently. If AEDs are located in rooms/buildings or similar areas where it can be assumed, or even must be assumed, that they might be subject to access control, this must be indicated with the Key:access directive. In my opinion, the definition of Key:access is very clear in this regard.
Otherwise, your AED card will direct people to AEDs to which they are not authorized/allowed to access.
chnuessli (2025-12-18 09:49:07+00:00): I agree.
the_third_man (2025-12-18 10:14:40+00:00): And what does your consent mean for future mapping?

My question regarding your quality assurance in another changeset remained unanswered.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129646874#map=19/47.403512/8.122189
chnuessli (2025-12-18 10:18:25+00:00): we will take a look how we can improve the quality without canibalizing the user experience. thank you for your valuable input.
the_third_man (2025-12-17 13:36:31+00:00): access=yes or permiissive?
chnuessli (2025-12-17 15:08:11+00:00): access=yes seems legit during opening_hours. access is a little bit of a discussion in combination with AED. See: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/access-no-auf-defibrillatoren-in-der-schweiz/118013
rempshaener (2025-12-18 18:54:06+00:00): Hallo,
Eine Anmerkung zu diesem Änderungssatz:
Hydranten sollten nicht mit Straßen, Gebäuden u. ä. verbunden werden. Das lässt sich leicht beheben: im Editor markieren und „E“ drücken – das löst den Hydranten von der Linie.
Vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag.
Viele Grüße
eggie (2025-12-17 14:01:43+00:00): Dag Berenboot..
Die prijs varieert toch doorlopend.
Dit lijkt me weinig zinvol al is het goed bedoeld.

Mvg
eggie
bartgron (2025-12-18 06:48:26+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-23 17:08:57+00:00): Fixed a number of errors/malformed tags: brand:wikidata=* not updated, brand=* doesn't match hotel name=*, name=* contains extraneous marketing, nonsensical tag value rooms=0, in changeset 184485959

https://osm.org/changeset/184485959
gscholz (2025-12-20 07:37:37+00:00): Hi alejandrofenollar,
this changeset has destroyed the boundary relations of "La Ñora" and "Los Polvorines":

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-1.18811&lat=37.99208&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=176049932

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
literan (2025-12-17 19:04:57+00:00): пешеходные переходы на Пречистенских воротах имеют асфальтовую поверхность: https://yandex.ru/maps/-/CLwTBAOB

поправлю
Александр Синявский (2025-12-17 19:10:31+00:00): Я не против. Тип покрытия был указан раннее и я его не менял. Тут вроде вообще было отмечено не «пешеходный переход», а «пешеходная дорожка». Скорее всего из-за этого так получилось.
literan (2025-12-18 19:57:09+00:00): даже если бы вы были против указания корректного тега, это бы ничего не изменило )

я все же хочу вас попросить, раз вы правите переходы, указывать surface=asphalt на них. Ведь это очень нужный тег на линиях дорог, навигаторы для разного вида транспорта его активно учитывают (в отличие от crossing=traffic_signals/uncontrolled, которые на линиях никому не нужны - согласно вики они проставляются на точках переходов https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:crossing )
Александр Синявский (2025-12-18 20:54:56+00:00): ))) По мере возможности. 
Просто тип покрытия гораздо удобнее, быстрее и большим количеством людей может быть указан через Street­Complete по факту на месте.
LeuvenNeedsTrams2 (2025-12-17 13:23:39+00:00): Thanks for the fixes, I was struggling with this one.
bxl-forever_repair (2025-12-17 13:49:31+00:00): You are welcome.

…

Hint: Commenting on someone’s edit marks the changeset as faulty.  Mappers with a lot of changeset comments are seen as bad mappers.
By commenting here above you’ve in fact… lowered my reputation within the community.  In the future, please be kind and avoid commenting on changesets if there are no mistakes in them. ;-)
szydzio (2026-01-01 20:24:14+00:00): Moim skromnym zdaniem mocno srogo z degradacją aż do tertiary. 
Oczywiście że S5 przejęła główny tranzyt, ale... to tak czy inaczej droga POZ=>WRO po "starym śladzie" z zachowanym jednak statusem wojewódzkiej (utrzymanie zimowe, bieżące remonty itd). 
Wystarczy jeden zator na S-ce a wszyscy przypominają sobie że taka droga funkcjonuje i jest nieco ważniejsza niż inne (obecnie trzeciorzędne) w okolicy...
AlexTopoRO (2025-12-17 13:27:40+00:00): You accidentally messed up a road in the Netherlands, please revert that
Wanderer2000 (2025-12-17 17:32:27+00:00): I have reverted the edit in the Netherlands
Something B (2025-12-18 13:29:35+00:00): Hi, Mateusz!
I think that amenity=audiologist makes sense, because other major healthcare facilities are tagged with amenity=*. Adding healthcare=audiologist to amenity=audiologist would be useful, but mere deletion of correct tag?
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-06-11 14:56:11+00:00): maybe it should be undeprecated? I have no strong preference but overall I would love to get rid of this silly amenity= healthcare= duplications

for example someone mass added healthcare=pharmacy that are utterly pointless, and now often people remove/lifecycle prefix only amenity=pharmacy leaving broken data
Something B (2026-06-11 15:01:40+00:00): "now often people remove/lifecycle prefix only amenity=pharmacy leaving broken data"
If so, You are right. Please disregard.
Yog Sot (2025-12-18 01:57:24+00:00): ale stara droga została usunieta czy tylko zaslepiona dla aut?
NeisBot (2025-12-17 19:37:38+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Dog daycare and boarding facility in Lake St Louis"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
Frank Peng (2025-12-17 15:20:05+00:00): What is the source for the addition of this apartment building? Aerial imagery of this location shows no apartment building here. Did this apartment building recently get built here?