piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Glassman (2024-02-02 20:52:38+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146893998
mavl (2024-02-23 18:52:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 147818131, 147828921 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects].
simo_explorer (2024-02-01 19:51:41+00:00): what is "ressource"?
I think it's a mistake, maybe you wanted to indicate "resource"
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Aresource
thanks for your collaboration
eggie (2024-01-31 09:19:23+00:00): Dag Remco...  Ik betwijfel of dit gaat helpen.

Wellicht emergency=no toevoegen aan het stukje track richting het hek en ook aan het hek zelf?

MVG
eggie
Glassman (2024-02-02 20:53:01+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146894559
Glassman (2024-02-02 20:54:15+00:00): connecting the path to the parking area isn't necessary.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146894619
Glassman (2024-02-02 20:55:13+00:00): Just use a node to add the business. I usually place them about where the entrance is located.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146894857
Glassman (2024-01-31 19:44:53+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146895168
eggie (2024-01-31 10:38:05+00:00): Dag Jan   Beter geen access=yes gaan taggen op paden. Dat is default.
Wel vehicle=no bijgetagd conform de andere paden hier. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-01-31 10:39:13+00:00): access= yes verwijderd  footway aangepast naar path Er zal vast geen G7 bord staan.
Jan Wollring (2024-01-31 10:42:22+00:00): Dank je wel zal volgende keer beter opletten bij de tags van de paden in de buurt. En eerst even laten controleren.
eggie (2024-01-31 10:44:55+00:00): Top!
eggie (2024-01-31 09:47:08+00:00): Remco  Mocht er een calamiteit zijn in de buurt van dat gesloten hek ben ik toch bang dat de route nog steeds over de Woutersweg gaat tot de afslag naar het hek.
De slagbomen bij de hoofdingang leveren volgens mij vertraging op in LiveOp!
Dat kwam ik ook tegen als mappers barrier= lift_gate op nodes plaatsten bij bruggen. 
Er was een manier om die vertraging op te lossen met een extra tag. 
locked=no op de liftgates?
Maar deze staan natuurlijk wel de hele dag naar beneden. Bij een brug is dat niet het geval. 
Neem aan dat uitbater de slagboom open zet bij een calamiteit. 

Groet
eggie
eggie (2024-01-31 10:09:01+00:00): Wanneer op een lift_gate geen access=yes staat blijft hij ook gesloten voor motorvoertuigen in de routers. 
Geen idee hoe LiveOp!  daar mee omgaat.
Remco G (2024-01-31 12:03:07+00:00): Dat is het probleem de uitbater is dan later en dan kunnen ze het beste via de hoofdingang komen en rechtstreeks naar plaats incident. Vooral met reanimatie inzetten is de tijd van belang
eggie (2024-01-31 12:16:14+00:00): In dat geval als bestemming de hoofdingang kiezen. 
evt emergency=yes op de slagboom zetten. Die staan overigens op de verkeerde plek.
eggie (2024-01-31 12:23:38+00:00): Slagboom aangepast en wat wegen verwijderd die dwars door de huisje lopen. Van de infrastructuur klopt niet veel meer hier
Taya_S (2024-01-31 11:58:59+00:00): Hello, OSM is not the place to add custom tags that are only there to be interpreted by one single app. `becknified` and `providerId` provide no additional information to the map and only serve as meaningless clutter.

Furthermore organised editing activities should comply with the organised editing guidelines. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines
Friendly_Ghost (2024-01-31 12:14:02+00:00): I took a moment to remove the 2 meaningless tags from this supermarket
marczoutendijk (2024-01-31 13:02:27+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15637
Littlebtc (2024-01-31 09:54:13+00:00): 附註：底圖根據台中市政府開放資料之都市計畫圖。
MxxCon (2024-02-04 08:43:22+00:00): Why is this tagged as ruins?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146896255
questfinder (2024-02-04 14:46:09+00:00): Please refer to OpenStreetMap wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ruins
MxxCon (2024-02-04 15:28:21+00:00): There's no single ruined building encompassing the whole block. If you want to say that these buildings are that, then these buildings should be updated with proper tags.
questfinder (2024-02-04 15:39:51+00:00): You could just update it and stop wasting time. Where are you from? You haven't been around this address, and you are claiming to know more about it.
MxxCon (2024-02-04 15:47:52+00:00): It doesn't matter where I'm from or if I've been around this address. Just like you mapped it from the satellite imagery, I can map it too and I see that the way you mapped it in this edit is wrong.
kucai (2024-02-01 03:56:19+00:00): Hi,  welcome to OSM. Selamat datang eh... :)

per your review request:
- we local mappers used to use living street before this, but most of us decided to stop using it since in actuality that classification  requires an official declaration that the street is such. (some of us still use it on dead end 'lorong' in taman perumahan though, it is an understanding that anybody driving fast enough to hit a kid on those street will be dealt harshly by the residents. hehe)

- usually streets around flats are designated as service roads, however my personal contention is that if there''s a street name for it then it's either residential (in flats area) or unclassified.

- most lower classed roads have the implicit allowance for bicycle, foot and everything else (except horses) - default values. No need to include them in the tags. However put restrictions if there's any. 

- you can use straighten lines (S on iD) to make the roads straight. First you chop them into segments, then straighten, then finally combine them again. 

- you can add a point and designate the place as neighborhood and name it. For apartments/flat areas, it is preferable to create a polygon around the areas, then tag it landuse=residential,  and name it. Further, you can refine with barrier = fence, barrier lift gate, access rights etc etc as appropriate.

Sorry for the lengthy comments. shoulda emailed you I guess. Bye!
Ewen Hill (2024-03-01 09:42:08+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM - This a appears to be a private road and the road should be set to access=private if you could do this please.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146896394
Warin61 (2024-02-01 00:18:17+00:00): Node 11572336916 deleted. 

This appears to be a duplication of existing Node: Stand F, Epping Station, Beecroft Rd (1170757338)
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-11-25 13:24:23+00:00): you added name=road here, to path: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1034581401/history

is it a road or a path?

(you also added name=road to many roads, not actually named "road" - this is not needed and I removed many of them)
sewesew (2024-01-31 11:09:39+00:00): OK, ciężko znaleźć info na ten temat.
Marek_P (2024-01-31 11:19:32+00:00): W najnowszym wykazie linii PKP PLK nie ma jej, więc bezpieczniej założyć że to projekt/budowa niż gotowa linia.
Tomas Straupis (2024-01-31 11:03:55+00:00): Laba diena. Nereikia šaligatvių braižyti kaip atskirų vektorių.
JUVAI (2024-01-31 11:10:23+00:00): Sveiki, papildomai su šiuo pakeitimu nieko nebrėžiau, pataisiau, tai kas buvo padaryta.
Tomas Straupis (2024-01-31 12:03:14+00:00): Ok tada. Bet esamų žymėjimų vandens tai nereikia keisti (iD yra labai prastas redaktorius ir siūlo nesąmones, skirtas tik labai paprastiems taisymams). Atstatysiu. Ir bicycle=yes žymų nereikia dėlioti.
JUVAI (2024-01-31 12:31:41+00:00): Supratau, ačiū už pastebėjimus. Kokį kitą redaktorių galėtumėte parekomenduoti? Ne daug taisau dalykų, tačiau kartais pastebiu neatitikimų.
Tomas Straupis (2024-01-31 12:57:11+00:00): JOSM. Jei nedaug redagavimų, tai gal ir neapsimoka diegtis. Tik pastebėjimas, kai atrodo, kad labai daug „neteisingai“ sužymėta, tai geriau paklausti, nes labiausiai tikėtina, kad viskas teisingai sužymėta :-) Paklausimas nieko nekainuoja ir tada išvengiama bereikalingų taisymų ir visokių kitokių nemalonių situacijų. O vietos žinios visada naudingos! Sėkmės!
JUVAI (2024-01-31 13:00:12+00:00): Supratau, ačiū labai už pastabas, turėsiu galvoje. Ir atsiprašau, jei pridariau klaidų. :)
Tomas Straupis (2024-01-31 13:02:44+00:00): Viskas gerai, visiems taip atsitinka :-) Geros dienos.
JUVAI (2024-01-31 13:19:09+00:00): O kuo iš tiesų skiriasi vandens telkinių tipai? Kalnu apie žmogaus sukurtus, nedidelius vandens telkinius, nes kai kur matau, kad yra water, kitur, basin, dar kitur reservoir, nors visi trys telkiniai yra vienas šalia kito.
pitscheplatsch (2024-02-01 07:20:40+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

I think your tag change of the following way does not make sense: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1112413245

What's the source of your mapping activity? Thanks.
aixbrick (2024-01-31 16:22:32+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OSM,
ich habe mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146911505 ein paar Korrekturen vorgenommen:
- Das Parkhaus ist https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/331514591. Du hast die Daten auf eine Relation gesetzt, die Gebäudeteile zusammenfasst.
- Statt "height" hast du sicherlich "maxheight" gemeint. Das ist bereits u.a. auf https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/899034829 erfasst.
- Dezimaltrenner ist grundsätzlich der Punkt.
Gruß
rskedgell (2024-01-31 12:58:52+00:00): Thanks for spotting and fixing that. I've added sidewalk tagging to the road and removed the silly and redundant access tags which iD encourages its users to add.
ajmat (2024-02-01 16:22:00+00:00): Hi rskedgell,
Thank you for your acknowledgment of the edit I made and for the updates you have made to further improve the road at this location.
Warin61 (2024-02-01 00:10:29+00:00): The bus stops added to route 549 are;

Not in sequential order

Have no relationship role
Warin61 (2024-02-03 00:03:43+00:00): Bus stops out of sequence and without roles removed from relation.
Intrigued (2024-02-01 18:13:23+00:00): Hi-- just to clarify, are there actually fences there? If so, this is completely fine.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146897633
spookypeanut (2024-02-02 09:21:53+00:00): Yes there are fences. Just wanted another opinion because it feels like it clutters the map a little. Thanks for taking the time to look!
osmviborg (2024-01-31 10:42:25+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146898458
Trevor_1 (2024-03-17 19:40:50+00:00): Hello. Is there a reason why you changed all these roads to Primary? The "Primary" tag is supposed to be used only for the most important highways. Many of these look like they're just minor state highways through rural areas
Trevor_1 (2024-03-17 19:41:53+00:00): Only for *some of the most important highways that aren't Motorway or Trunk. And also, there shouldn't be primary stubs/dead-ends
eggie (2024-01-31 10:43:50+00:00): Comment moet zijn added additional info school
emersonveenstra (2024-02-01 12:42:59+00:00): Hi there,

You seem to have accidentally removed the highway tag from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/8759873 and replaced it with a playground tag. Could you please fix this? Thanks!
emersonveenstra (2024-02-01 12:43:42+00:00): You also seem to have removed the building and tourism tag from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/545743014, could you please fix that as well?
Ewen Hill (2024-02-01 02:39:01+00:00): Hi 0Q7Z0343QX, please do not map private driveways with access=all. The correct method is
highway=service
service=driveway
access=private
surface=unpaved
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146899085
Marek-M (2024-01-31 16:42:29+00:00): Cześć, ogólnie przyjęto w OSM, że place dla pieszych w takim stylu jak Ty tutaj utworzyłeś https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1244878846 są dopuszczalne aczkolwiek powinien on zawierać jeszcze tag area:highway=pedestrian.

Prawidłowo taki plac powinien mieć tylko klucz area:highway=pedestrian ale wtedy nie jest on renderowany na głównej mapie OSM.

Oprócz obszaru placu powinny być na mapę naniesione również trasy łączące poszczególne chodniki przy tym placu, bo bez nich nawigacje będą prowadzić pieszych po obwiedni placu.

Staraj się również nie łączyć linii highway z obszarami, szczególnie wzdłuż obszaru - tutaj chodnik ma wspólny fragment linii z placem:
https://i.imgur.com/czgWE9t.png

Tutaj jest changeset z moimi poprawkami: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=146912342
woodpeck_repair (2024-01-31 11:01:21+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 146831638, 146834239, 146868492, 146870104.
Ewen Hill (2024-02-01 02:36:44+00:00): Hi, This should be set to access = private. It is important not to map private driveways as access to all due to strict biosecurity reasons.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146899188
Fizzie-DWG (2024-08-09 05:20:00+00:00): Reverted by DWG for apparent fictitious mapping

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155005234
EduKehakettu (2024-02-03 20:33:27+00:00): Alueelle näyttäisi olevan lisätty nyt paljon nurmikkoalueita myös sellaisiin kohtiin, missä ei todellisuudessa ole nurmikkoa; esimerkiksi Kulovalkeankuja 2 ja Kulovalkeantie 22 välissä on pitkälti pusikkoa ja Kulovalkeantie 19 pohjoispuolella on pusikkoinen kalliorinne, ei nurmialue.
liljaadeliina (2024-11-20 08:54:35+00:00): Kiitos huomiosta.
MxxCon (2024-02-06 08:11:21+00:00): As documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:stars#United_States
stars= tag for hotels should not be used in US at all.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146899975
MxxCon (2024-02-06 08:11:55+00:00): Additionally, "Independent" is not a valid value for brand= tag. That's not a name of a brand.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146899975
bwbuz (2024-02-01 09:01:40+00:00): Ein bisschen mehr Sorgfalt bitte bei deinen Änderungen, damit du nicht korrekte und benötigte Inhalte löscht, wie hier den stop "Wolgast, Bahnhof (UBB)" aus der Routen "Bus 129: Helmshagen => Greifswald => Katzow => Wolgast" und "Bus 135: Wrangelsburg => Lühmannsdorf => Wolgast" - habe es bereits wieder repariert.
bkil (2024-01-31 11:59:20+00:00): Köszönjük a frissítést. Látom Strava alatt is van forgalom már a Székely utcán. Viszont az új utcákon a surface=ground illetve a Tamási Áron elején a surface=sand kicsit gyanúsnak látszik. Biztosan nem surface=compacted való ide (réteges, murvával szórt, úthengerrel tömörített)?
Zrop (2024-02-06 17:15:11+00:00): Hallo NRWPeter (Ichbinvonhier,)

bei Ortseingangsschilder "traffic_sign=city_limit" sollte immer der "name" des Ortes und "direction=*" mit angegeben werden.
Da hier ja ein "traffic_sign=city_limit" steht dürfte dieser Straßenabschnitt https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1244886996 dann auch nicht mehr "maxspeed=100" haben.
Schaust Du Dir das bitte nochmal an und ergänzt/korrigierst das, Danke.

Gruß
Zrop
gscholz (2024-02-11 06:58:17+00:00): Hi Masud Mamza,
your recent edits have left behind several errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=7.41313&lat=10.53779&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=146900605

Can you please fix this?

This kind of result is very typical for JOSM users who just press "o" and do not care about the results. You can apply the internal validator to avoid uploading such errors.

Kind regards
Guido
wireguy (2024-02-01 14:18:00+00:00): Acer, can you check hole 2?  Looks like you may have deleted part of it.
eggie (2024-01-31 12:42:20+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback  Waarschijnlijk access=private
Al die tags met unknown kun je beter verwijderen

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Henry572 (2024-01-31 13:43:18+00:00): Danke fürs Erledigen!
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-31 12:50:25+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1244910678

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eggie (2024-01-31 13:32:29+00:00): Hoi.. evt access=private zou je kunnen toevoegen.. ook aan het gedeelte achter het hek.
Maar up to you.. ik ken de situatie niet.
Veel plezier met mappen..
eggie
Udarian (2024-02-03 21:15:40+00:00): can you check if way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1187974460 is multiple ways (each oneway=yes), since when I last passed by the site there seemed to be physically separated ways (separated by kerbs) for entrance and exit (though it was still under construction), it seems that this is were the entrance/exit gates for the apartment complex is.  
thank you in advance,
happy mapping
vrynkevich_lyft (2024-02-05 13:07:33+00:00): Hi, Udarian!
You’re right, according to Lyft-owned aerial imagery there is a physical barrier separating one-way roads. But at the moment of making changes to the OSM we were not sure of the direction of the roads (no markings visible) and that the exit road was already open due to lack of information. Thanks to your comment, we can now make changes to the road geometry (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147088007). 
Best regards, Veranika
jptolosa (2024-02-03 05:19:27+00:00): Hello, you have retagged some railways from railway=abandoned to railway=disused where the tracks have clearly dismantled according satellite imagery.
rojjodo (2024-03-06 20:35:57+00:00): Hi,
You have updated the bridleway across Elmans Green with 'no access'. I assume this was only intended to be for the section through the trees. As it stands you have denied access through a main gate, which was open when I walked there last week. Please correct which sections are closed and which not.
Thanks
Bob Dean
DressyPear4 (2025-11-25 02:17:14+00:00): Um filtro, alguns ajustes e boas práticas evitariam esse tipo de sobreposição em importações
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11019230/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17133119/history
rojjodo (2024-03-06 20:41:25+00:00): Hi,
You have placed a gate with no access on the junction of Brians Ride and the Western Boundary, effectively closing the Western Boundary to routing engines. From memory, I think the gate is on Brians Ride, close to the main path but not on it.
Regards
Bob Dean
BCNorwich (2024-01-31 17:12:24+00:00): Fiction was removed by reverting this changeset.
BCNorwich (2024-01-31 17:14:50+00:00): I've removed this fiction and reinstated the buildings you deleted.
marczoutendijk (2024-01-31 18:39:51+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15641
Jósa (2025-02-21 12:51:04+00:00): Este restaurante fechou permanentemente. Atualmente não há nada no local.
runiq (2024-02-02 13:21:45+00:00): Schaut soweit gut aus, aber wie hast du das überprüft? Heißt das Restaurant wirklich so? Auf der verlinkten Seite taucht der von dir vergebene Name "Harbour Restaurant" nicht auf.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146906861
woodpeck_repair (2024-01-31 14:10:30+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 146872613.
LocalMapGuru (2024-04-14 03:32:56+00:00): Hi there.

Your changeset appears to have moved a T-line tower on top of I-435N here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2177573941

Could you please place the tower back to its original location?

Thanks.
bxl-forever (2024-01-31 15:28:58+00:00): Hello,

Chances were very low that calling for help through a changeset title are noticed but you are lucky I spotted this in the list.

I think you are referring to messages used by the "iD" editor, as I see this is what you are using to edit the map (iD is a small online editor in Javascript available on osm.org.)

There was a mapping error here because if roads are on different levels we must tell the system that one goes above the other.  This is used through the "layer" tag.  Don’t bother, I was happy to fix it.

We’ll fix all the other mistakes too.
Have a nice day.
Vinber-Pro (2025-10-25 10:14:43+00:00): Bonjour,
encore un point créé au milieu de nul part alors qu'il y a un autre point ici existant, dans un bâtiment, ce qui semble plus logique pour une agence immobilière.

oui j'écris encore car ce n'est pas la première fois que je signale un point créé en dehors de tout bâtiment.

à vous
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2025-10-27 07:46:17+00:00): Bonjour,

En effet, désolé pour l'erreur, c'est corrigé
Cordialement,
L'Equipe DB
silversurfer83 (2024-01-31 19:21:51+00:00): Gude :)

kleiner Tip: Wenn du mit JOSM in Hessen neue Häuser einzeichnest kannst du unter "Hintergrund -> Karte" die Liegenschaftskarte einblenden und direkt die korrekten Adressen einpflegen.

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146907314
mistersixt (2024-02-01 06:05:31+00:00): Uiiih, danke... das wusste ich noch nicht, das werde ich mir mal anschauen!

VG, Jörg.
silversurfer83 (2024-02-01 06:13:58+00:00): Moin Jörg :)

Kein Problem. Geht mittlerweile bei Vespucci (mobiler android editor) auch. Und falls du mal bei Nachbars in NRW mappst, die haben auch hillshade und Kataster im Angebot

Happy mapping
eggie (2024-01-31 15:43:05+00:00): Welcome to OSM,

Please don't add info on the map that is already there, I will delete your contribution. 

 Greetz,
eggie
Joseph R P (2024-02-14 18:32:09+00:00): Hello, short segments of highways should not be tagged as motorways for brief grade-separated sections or through interchanges. These sections of US 33 is better as a trunk route for now until the at-grade/signalized intersections are removed, grade separated, or converted to RIROs.
Tomas Straupis (2024-01-31 15:33:12+00:00): Bet tai nėra „parkas“ (oficialiai miesto savivaldybės apibrėžta teritorija su tipu „parkas“). Čia lyg ir muziejus? Tik nežinau, jei veikia. Jei veikia - galima pridėti tourism=museum. Taipogi nereikia šio ploto iškirpti iš aplink esančios gyvenamosios žemėnaudos, nes tai irgi gyvenamoji žemėnauda.
JUVAI (2024-01-31 15:54:18+00:00): Sodyba - muziejus greičiau, bet turbūt tiks ir muziejus. Taip, tikrai veikiantis. Kaip matau, atlikote pakeitima tiesiog su riba. Ar reikia tuomet papildomo tag tourism=museum?
Tomas Straupis (2024-01-31 17:57:52+00:00): Taip, visam poligonui pridėti tourism=museum žymą.
Tokio objekto tipo kaip „sodyba“ OSM'e nėra. Galima būtų žiūrėti žaisti su kokiu nors museum_type, tik kad niekas tokios informacijos nenaudos, todėl, manau, neverta.
SpinOff (2024-01-31 18:03:45+00:00): Hejj. Droga dojazdowa do domów to co najwyżej highway=residential.

Jakby co, poprawiłem już ten obszar.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-10-22 15:02:52+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4436185663/history has shop = animal that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
shop=animal ? What kind of shop, if any is here? Is it selling pets or supplies for them (in such casem, why not use https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=pet ?)

Is it selling livestock?

Is it selling butchered animals?