piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
limes11 (2023-09-20 13:35:10+00:00): Hi, 

danke für den Beitrag. Prinzipiell können auch Wege auf Privatgrundstücken erfasst werden. Zugangsberechtigungen werden dann über entsprechende tags ergänzt. In dem Fall war die Zufahrt falsch verzeichnet, der Zugang erfolgt sicher von der Straße im Osten.
Es kann sein, dass den Zufahrtsweg jemand (z.B. amazon) eines Tages erfasst.

Viele Grüße
Netz2001 (2023-09-20 18:31:31+00:00): Hallo,

ja die Zufahrt ist von Osten. Und es gibt dann keine Verbindung zum Kreisvergehr.
dreua (2024-02-18 15:57:30+00:00): Hallo und danke für deine Ergänzungen in der OpenStreetmap!
Ich schau gerade mal grob über das Tagging von Schließfächern, laut Wiki heißt der Tag "locker" ohne s. Bevor ich das einfach ändere kurz die Frage: War das ein Versehen oder hast du bewusst "lockers" getaggt?
dulix9 (2024-02-18 16:51:58+00:00): Hallo dreua
Danke für das Feedback.
Richtig ist natürlich locker.
Jetzt habe ich aber hier https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dlocker gelesen, dass luggage_locker noch passender wäre.
Darum habe ich es jetzt mit luggage_locker getagged.
dreua (2024-02-18 17:15:27+00:00): Super, danke dir für die schnelle Korrektur! Stimmt, an den luggage_locker hatte ich jetzt gar nicht mehr gedacht, war nur mit locker/s beschäftigt.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-09-20 10:10:33+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.

"Dębowiec":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11204748326
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11204748327
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11204748328
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11204748333
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11204748334
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11204748335
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11204748336
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11204750937
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11204750938
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11204750939
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/488443578
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/488443750
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/698281808
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/698281864
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/984507620
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/993179407
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/993179409
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1209337460

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
dcapillae (2023-09-20 13:05:06+00:00): Buenas tardes, Cisneros.

He hecho una pequeña modificación en el nodo de entrada. En lugar de usar «entrance=yes», aquí usamos «barrier=gate» por tratarse de una verja o puerta de entrada a través de un muro o una valla. Más detalles en el wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dgate

La etiqueta «entrance=yes», «entrance=main», etc., se usan normalmente en nodos de entrada de edificios. Más detalles en el wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:entrance

Gracias por su colaboración.

Atentamente,

Daniel Capilla
Cisneros1992 (2023-09-21 12:28:40+00:00): Perfecto, gracias nuevamente.
eggie (2023-09-20 10:43:59+00:00): Er zit wel een mp fout in Buitenste weg MP deelt segment met andere ring. 
Draai de validator!
gr eggie
eggie (2023-09-20 10:47:05+00:00): Dat stuk bos mag het water dat in dezelfde relatie zit niet raken. 
Twee inners mogen geen contact hebben.
Het is op te lossen door een lege lijn om het stuk bos en het binnenwater te leggen en daar de inner van te maken. Het bos en het water zelf haal je dan uit de relatie. Die delen dan samen een leeg vlak dat dan de inner is.
eggie (2023-09-20 10:49:51+00:00): Ik wil het ook wel doen dan kun je zien hoe ik zoiets oplos.. Zeg het maar.
eggie (2023-09-20 10:51:09+00:00): Kijk even hoe ik dat ronde stukje water met links dat bos een paar jaar geleden in een lege inner mp heb gelegd
Wesley_Link (2023-09-20 10:52:52+00:00): Hé Eggie als jij daar tijd voor hebt zou dat mooi zijn. Dan kan ik het inderdaad even zien hoe je zo iets oplost in de toekomst
eggie (2023-09-20 10:57:39+00:00): moment
Wesley_Link (2023-09-20 10:59:50+00:00): Zal er straks eens naar kijken moet zo naar me werk. Bedankt weer voor je hulp
eggie (2023-09-20 10:59:52+00:00): ahhh  het is nog ingewikkelder. Dat bosje zit alleen maar tegen de relatie aan.. Even denken
eggie (2023-09-20 11:20:31+00:00): Het probleem was hier dat de outer van de mp grass de inner van het water raakte. Nu loopt de outer grass om het water en het bos heen en de twee vlakken water en bos zitten nu ingesloten in een lege inner mp zonder tags. 
Het geeft geen foutmeldingen meer. De andere foutmelding over die mp's die op elkaar liggen gewoon nog even negeren.
Wesley_Link (2023-09-20 11:45:45+00:00): Oke top dankjewel zal straks eens kijken
BCNorwich (2023-09-21 07:46:47+00:00): Hi, Please be aware of the many warnings given above about problems with these edits.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2023-09-21 07:53:24+00:00): You've deleted part of a forest area outline and tagged the remaining part as a footpath.
BCNorwich (2023-09-22 07:56:11+00:00): Hi, I've managed to restore the forest area. There are now many long sections of area outlines that you have drawn a footpath on top of. Can these all be removed?

Regards Bernard.
Frans S (2023-10-08 10:39:24+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
B: Overlapping buildings.
E. Rectangular building not squared.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141506439
Frans S (2023-10-08 10:40:27+00:00): Another issue as well
D: Connecting nodes of buildings to other buildings
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141506439
Frans S (2023-10-08 10:37:23+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
E. Rectangular building not squared.
F: Mapping of building partly hidden by trees.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141506492
eggie (2023-09-20 16:44:11+00:00): De nieuwe stukken groen heb ik in de outer mp opgenomen.
gr eggie
maraf24 (2023-09-21 06:21:49+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
fititnt (2023-12-13 04:18:07+00:00): Olá JoltCode. Por que você deletou a a highway=residential+name="Rua Gilberto Pott" em https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/541760064 ?

Essa via teve o nome reconfirmado pelo @sulriograndense no https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133424826 . A fotne do seu changeset tem um genérico source="aerial imagery" enquando o do outro colega inclusive tem "Mapa de Estradas do Município de Roca Sales"
eggie (2023-09-20 11:33:50+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feed back  Wat was je bedoeling hier.  De vorm van het gebouw komt nog steeds niet overeen met de data van de BAG.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-09-20 11:36:55+00:00): herstel.. Het klopt aardig..
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/?searchQuery=beukenlaan+40+eind&objectId=0772100000299837&theme=BRT+Achtergrond&geometry.x=159254.1405&geometry.y=384186.5075&zoomlevel=15&bijbehorendeAdressen=Pand

Maar iets veranderen aan de vorm wordt vaak overruled bij periodieke updates.
Iets aanpassen heeft weinig zin. 
Die node komt uit het Kadaster.
gr eggie
tanarchy (2023-09-29 07:11:41+00:00): Dag Eggie, dankjewel voor de feedback! Ik ben eigenlijk begonnen in Waze omdat er veel panden niet klopte en er twee gebouwen over elkaar heen lagen.

Kan ik in de wiki terug vinden welke onderdelen uit automatiche nodes komen?

Gr,
tanarchy
eggie (2023-09-29 07:24:05+00:00): Hoi.. De wiki is helaas een doolhof.
Het enige dat grootschalig wordt geïmporteerd zijn gebouwen en adressen.

In 2007 is er een import geweest van het wegenstelsel.. donatie kaartenmaker AND.
Later nog een keer van de landuse.. de 3dshapes.

Soms zijn er bulkimports.. maar die worden eerst bediscussieerd.
Straatmeubilair.. bomen..
Meestal wordt dat teruggedraaid.. want niet volgens de regels.

Kijk even op het forum in het draadje BAG importverzoeken.. dan wordt duidelijk hoe dat in zn werk gaat.
Mapse..
eggie
eggie (2023-09-29 07:39:34+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Basisregistratie_Adressen_en_Gebouwen
jmsbert (2023-12-30 00:14:42+00:00): Hello JoltCode,
thanks for contributing to this humanitarian project in Brasil. Besides buildings you also mapped swimming_pools here. 
As they are on private ground normally the additional tag "private=yes" should be set to avoid confusion with public pools.
Also only the actual area should be mapped as "leisure=swimming_pool", not the surrounding paved area. In another case you created a multipolygon with an area of natural=water as "inner" and leisure=swimming_pool" as "outer" - this is totally odd and has been corrected now.

If you decide to add features like this, please take a look at the relevant Wiki page which gives mostly an excellent explanation, for swimming_pools: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=swimming_pool

For future contributions to HOT projects I would ask you to stick to the instructions. and to add just the items requested for this project.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141507448
cleary (2023-09-20 21:19:13+00:00): Thanks for acting on the nonsensical "beach" tag. I was feeling a sense of alarm when I saw this area overwhelming other features on the map. I think you are correct in pondering if i using KG classification works for OSM. It is a theory (possibly with some validity - I don't know) and the theorised area could be overlaid on the map for special purposes but it is not an observable natural feature and is not a legally defined administrative boundary so I do not think it is appropriate on the map.  Yes we should map natural features but this area is not such a natural feature. I have visited some of the locations within the area and many are neither "desert" nor "sand". Examples are Lake Menindee, the Caryapundy Swamp, areas along the Barrier Highway west of Broken Hill, along the Eyre Highway in Western Australia, areas around Windorah and Boulia in Qld and many more. I saw some wooded areas, some water and wetland, some towns, a lot of scrub and some areas that I could describe only as "dirt". I saw some small areas of sand but perhaps only about one percent of the areas I visited. I agree that beach is incorrect but I also disagree with sand. The KG area can stay in the OSM database and would be found by anyone searching for it but it does not merit a single natural=* tag. I would like to see the individual areas of wood, scrub, water, wetland, sand etc each mapped in OSM - there would be millions of such small  areas across the continent. But the KG classification area is not a single natural feature and I suggest removing the natural=* tag. I think you were right to remove the beach tag but I believe this very large area cannot be mapped with any single natural=* tag.  I think others have considered how to map identifiable deserts such as Simpson Desert and Great Sandy Desert but have yet to find suitable ways to define these areas. And even if one could define the areas, no desert consists of a single natural feature. Thanks for removing  the "beach" tag. I suggest also removing the "sand" tag and not using any natural=* tag for this area.
Ewen Hill (2023-09-20 23:40:17+00:00): Hi, thanks for the thoughts Cleary and I agree that any overall natural tag is not suitable for this or any other large relation of this size however I am please keep the KG area available for use by anyone interested in this area.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-09-20 11:00:28+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.

"Zarzecze":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7184325072
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/488463044
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/488463247
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/488463318
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/488463957
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/488464030
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/488464039
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/488464077
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/488464102
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/755683983
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/755683985
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/905061518
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/905061562
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/905061623
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/905061644
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/905061740
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1124055519
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1124055531
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1124055532
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1133989613
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1133989614

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Jakka (2023-09-21 08:00:21+00:00): Is dit voor alle vervoermiddelen fiets bromfiets a b speed_pedelec ?
GIS schoten (2023-09-22 09:09:22+00:00): Eenrichtingsverkeer is van toepassing voor Bromfietsen B.
Eenrichtingsverkeer is NIET van toepassing voor fietsen, bromfietsen A, en speedpedelecs.
Jakka (2023-09-22 09:29:16+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/35435762
thx
napsav (2023-09-20 11:08:07+00:00): Wrong wikidata tag
eggie (2023-09-20 11:44:02+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-09-20 11:46:03+00:00): TNO staat nu 3x op de kaart, maar wellicht kun je gewoon de adresnode gebruiken?
1x lijkt me voldoende.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-09-20 16:25:12+00:00): De naam TNO stond 5x op de kaart. Nu verplaatst naar de adresnode.
Je kunt geen gebouwen aanpassen op grond van schuin genomen luchtfoto's. Ik heb de gebouwen uitgelijnd op grond van de data van de BAG (Kadaster) .
MVG
eggie
splungedude (2023-09-21 07:23:31+00:00): Dankjewel voor de verbeteringen en tips!
rhtb0 (2023-09-20 13:55:46+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1208290496
여기 개통 안했습니다. 당진 연장선과 같이 2027년에 개통합니다. 현재 아산 방면 진출로와 청주 방면 진입로만 개통한 상태입니다. Its 국가교통정보센터 홈페이지나 카카오맵 등을 확인하시기 바랍니다.
rhtb0 (2023-09-20 13:56:15+00:00): https://www.its.go.kr/
CCTV 확인 바랍니다.
sbelemey (2023-09-20 11:47:07+00:00): #mbx_france_roads
tux67 (2023-09-21 06:19:55+00:00): Hallo MAlbers
willkommen bei Openstreetmap und danke, dass du mithelfen möchtest, die Kartendaten zu verbessern.
Bevor du weitermappst, würde ich empfehlen dich bitte mit ein paar Grundprinzipien bei OSM vertraut zu machen. 
Du hast mit diesem Change das wichtigste Attribut eines Weges gelöscht (highway=*), 4 redundante Tags hinzugefügt (access=private hätte gereicht) und das  Name Tag so verwendet, wie es bei OSM nicht gedacht ist:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Verwende_das_Name-Tag_nicht,_um_Dinge_zu_beschreiben%E2%86%99

Prima, dass du deine Änderungssätze mit aussagekräftigen Kommentaren versiehst.
Viel Spaß beim Mappen wünscht
tux67
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141509839
tux67 (2023-09-21 06:20:44+00:00): P.S.: Eine gute allgemeine Einführung zu OSM gibts z.B. hier:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Solltest du Fragen haben oder Hilfe benötigen, dann kannst du dich gerne bei mir oder im Forum melden:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/de/56

Für eine Qualitätssicherung, an der sich alle Mapper in der Gegend beteiligen können - bitte antworte - wenn notwendig - immer hier im Änderungssatz mit der Kommentarfunktion.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141509839
SHARCRASH (2023-09-20 12:02:28+00:00): The restored elements are w172583370, w420004133, w832902059, w420004109, w1019398512, w1019398513, w172583386, w318715231, w1004371068, w420274443, w1004371067, w854051577, w119909434, w1019398520, w1019398489
tux67 (2023-09-21 06:24:34+00:00): Telefonnummern bitte im ITU-T E.164-Format mappen:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:phone#Wie_mappen?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141510095
pantufla (2023-10-10 08:23:51+00:00): El peaje ya estaba marcado. Lo borro. El puesto también está marcado. No se pueden añadir dos en uno tampoco.
M!dgard (2023-09-20 14:12:12+00:00): Hi,

delivery is not accurate here since one needs a specific permit to enter the zone. The tagging as it was already expresses that permit holders can enter:

vehicle=private, private=exceptional_permit, exceptional_permit=BE:gent:autovrij_gebied

and

vehicle=no, vehicle:conditional=private @ (18:00-11:00), private=exceptional_permit, exceptional_permit=BE:gent:autovrij_gebied (for streets that are pedestrian zone between 11 and 18).

The Ghent zone was mapped by me for a client who is now using this data in their software. If you have further questions, feel free to contact me.

If your routing software does not take this into account yet, you could consider asking its developers to support this.

This change was reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141516153.

Kind regards, M!dgard
al_bui (2023-09-20 14:56:52+00:00): apparently, osrm doesn't understand your elaborate taging combination. wich routing system do you use ?
M!dgard (2023-09-20 15:11:20+00:00): As far as I know, for the moment, the client uses a routing profile that just allows access to all private roads.
tux67 (2023-09-21 06:31:18+00:00): Bei 30er Zonen wie dieser (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=198696972474761) bitte noch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:source:maxspeed angeben.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141510687
user_18267930 (2023-09-20 18:33:49+00:00): What is your source for the firepit 11204994944? In general, why don't you add any sources? Please check the wiki.

Don't you think it would be wiser to add nodes like firepits after surveys, just because you see something on old lidar, doesn't mean there is (still) a legal firepit?
 
Why do you have the urge to map in such detail places you have never visited and probably never will? Armchairmapping has its limits.
eggie (2023-09-20 12:53:14+00:00): Dag Wastarce..  Prima om iets te verwijderen wat er niet meer is, maar kan dan de amenity=school beter ook niet voorlopig weg. 
Komt dezelfde school hier terug. Bestaat het adres nog wel?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-09-20 12:55:29+00:00): Wellicht de IKC De Droomhof nog als proposed taggen
proposed:amenity=school
eggie (2023-09-20 12:56:55+00:00): En een vlak landuse=construction
eggie (2023-09-20 16:14:32+00:00): Aangepast naar construction en proposed.
Er is nog geen school hier.
https://www.satellietdataportaal.nl/?base=openstreetmap&res=0.3%2C0.5&datemin=20-09-2022&loc=50.89269%2C6.060824%2C19z&overlay=mos-0&marker=loc&acqdate=2023-09-09&acqid=20230909_103131_PNEO-03_1_9&sensor=Pleiades-NEO
MKnight (2023-09-20 13:18:24+00:00): Moin!

ANgerissen? ;)

In OSM ist es üblich, abgerissene Gebäude erst einmal nicht zu löschen, sondern mit razed-prefix zu versehen. (Ich habe das mal nachgeholt)

Der Grund ist, dass - solang die noch auf Luftbildern zu sehen sind - die nicht jemand ohne Ortskenntnis neu malt.
rhtb0 (2023-09-20 14:03:55+00:00): 자동차전용도로의 여부는 따로 motorroad=* 태그를 사용하여 표시하도록 되어 있습니다. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:motorroad
rhtb0 (2023-09-20 14:09:36+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ko:%ED%95%9C%EA%B5%AD%EC%9D%98_%EB%8F%84%EB%A1%9C
가끔 '고속화도로'와 헷갈려 하는 '자동차 전용도로'는 길의 분류 체계가 아니라 도로의 속성으로 보아야 하며 'motorroad=yes'를 써야 합니다.
Jisho (2023-09-22 00:43:27+00:00): 네, motorroad의 존재 여부에 대해서는 전부터 인지하고 있었습니다. 자동차전용의 여부뿐만 아니라 장검~신복로터리 구간의 관리기관도 도로공사가 아닌 울산시청이어서 (장검IC 위에 관리구간 표지가 부착되어 있습니다) 해당 구간을 highway=primary로 간 것인데, highway=motorway로 존치해야 하겠다면 motorroad=no의 사용도 생각해봄직하겠습니다.
rhtb0 (2023-09-22 04:39:26+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ko:%ED%95%9C%EA%B5%AD%EC%9D%98_%EB%8F%84%EB%A1%9C
이 부분은 링크의 문서의 내용으로 osm 텔레그램에서 합의한 부분이라고 합니다.
Gregory Peony (2024-12-01 19:54:52+00:00): A building in this changeset has excess nodes. You can press shift+y to simplify ways removing such nodes.
Tomas Straupis (2023-09-21 04:47:14+00:00): Atstačiau teisingą tvenkinio žymėjimą landuse=reservoir. Nereikia klausyti iD „pasiūlymų“. Tai labai prastas redaktorius ir siūlo nesąmones.
M!dgard (2023-09-20 14:13:30+00:00): This changeset was reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141516153. See comments at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141510663 for rationale.
jmsbert (2023-12-29 13:15:49+00:00): Hello nnassar,
thank you for contributing to this humanitarian project in Brazil.
You added three buildings here which is totally fine as mapping buildings was one focus of this project. No complains about this!

One kind note to consider for future mappings:
You also mapped an area of natural=wood. Besides that mapping this feature was not part of the project, the nodes of the wooden area were glued with the nodes of the buildings. This makes it more difficult to work on / improve the building conture. That's why it is common sense to avoid shared nodes between buildings and highways, buildings and landuses. The only exception where shared nodes are accepted is between different landuses (e.g. residential area and natural=wood) or for this area between the wood and the river bank.

I have corrected the issues in the area now.

Keep on mapping - every contribution is highly appreciated!
CometSeeker (2023-09-21 09:21:25+00:00): Здравствуйте! Можете прокомментировать удаление 
landuse=residential и residential=urban c микрорайонов?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:landuse%3Dresidential
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:residential%3Durban
Глеб (2023-09-21 10:13:13+00:00): Добрый день!
Были отмечены не микрорайоны, а городская застройка. Городская застройка не имеет названия. Микрорайоны отмечаются тегом place=quarter. После приведения микрорайонов в должный вид нужно отрисовать территорию, расположенную под жилыми кварталами соответствующим землепользованием landuse=residential residential=urban.
Глеб (2023-09-21 12:29:43+00:00): Если вы хотите видеть видеть подписи на карте, можно продублировать теги полигона квартала на точку.
map per (2023-09-21 12:03:48+00:00): Wegen review_requested:
Die Änderung sieht gut aus, danke!