piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
真中あお (2026-07-05 17:26:50+00:00): 感谢您为osm作出贡献！整理文保体系是很有价值的工作。
不过，您这笔编辑中有一些地方，与我知道的实际情况不太相符：
战前动员会旧址是教堂，不是城隍庙。近年来其又修缮好，在举行宗教活动了。
原泸定县第一中学（今年和泸定中学合并了）的校园在之前虽然画得比较粗糙，但根据我的本地知识，其确实是延伸到了丰碑街一带，并不像其他商业地图上那样小。（你可以参考这个航拍照： https://www.720yun.com/vr/a57je5tn5O0 ）
另外，根据wiki中的条目所述， 我的理解是historic=haritage 目前已经不推荐使用了，标古迹时 historic=* 填实际的类型会比较好。
我根据我所知情况，修改校名的同时也把上边说的问题一并改了了。不过，如果有更好的信息源说明实际情况已与我了解的不同，自然也欢迎大家再不吝斧正。
祝编安~
Higashimado (2026-07-07 22:47:41+00:00): 感谢您的提醒和修正！

因为没有更具时效的来源，在进行这次（可能还有其他）编辑时，您提到的这些信息确实被我忽略了。很感谢您能指出并据此修正。

OSM Wiki 上对 historic=heritage 的描述介绍得比较模糊，也没有相关的讨论页，这方面我到没有特别的意见。

国内文保的分类还有很多值得讨论的地方，如果您有什么好的想法也请不吝赐教呀 🤗

同，祝编安~
Glassman (2025-11-06 18:23:59+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174263455
eggie (2025-11-06 05:57:38+00:00): Dag Alex,
Wanneer een bedrijf verhuist dan graag de adresnode intact houden. Ik zal deze weer herstellen.
Format phone voor NL is +31..

country NL hoef je niet in te vullen.
Je edits 
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=174263570
MVG
eggie
alexjonker (2025-11-06 10:04:13+00:00): Top, dankjewel!
NorthCrab_upload (2025-11-05 23:44:37+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/394655614

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
mapper377 (2025-11-06 01:22:27+00:00): Spelling errors in changeset comment. It should say "Add some tags to the building outline for Domino's Farms Office Park, 24 Frank Lloyd Wright Drive, Ann Arbor, MI."
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-05 23:51:00+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 174115863, 174116602, 174116896, 174116950, 174117054, 174146147, 174146320.
aharvey (2025-11-06 02:14:43+00:00): you've already set the speed limit on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/462198936 which is where it needs to be set.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1447829950 created a duplicate road
aharvey (2025-11-06 02:42:44+00:00): I've removed the duplicate road, and split the original way where you describe the 50 limit change and set that for the town section. Feel free to take a look and improve if needed.
SomeoneElse (2025-11-08 23:14:43+00:00): Thanks for tidying this up.
You wouldn't happen to know if the NCN4 still routes through here?  https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1318928#map=17/51.544100/-2.640554 shows a gap, but it might just be all a building site...
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2025-11-08 23:29:26+00:00): ... and Eurovelo 2 as well: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5479822#map=17/51.543533/-2.639439 .
DaveF (2025-12-30 16:07:37+00:00): It's removed a section of NCN4.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9540148#map=19/51.543921/-2.640489
DaveF (2025-12-30 16:08:56+00:00): ...or even this NCN 4.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1318928#map=18/51.543918/-2.640412
martien-176 (2025-11-08 16:05:14+00:00): Hi Laura,  this highway is connecting settlements, so unclassified is a better tag imo.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174265051
Baloo Uriza (2025-11-06 14:44:09+00:00): "Added riverbanks" would have probably been a better changeset comment.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174265171
BC168 (2025-11-07 02:48:10+00:00): Du hast Bussteig 2 mit Wartehaus auf der östlichen Straßenseite und die zugehörige Halteposition von 164 und NE5 gelöscht. Jetzt ist nur noch die Haltestelle der Linie 184 auf der anderen Straßenseite übrig.

Bist du sicher? Ich sehe auf dem Luftbild jedenfalls auf beiden Seiten der Straße eine Haltestellenmarkierung.
user_489371 (2025-11-07 11:20:58+00:00): Ich habe als unerfahrener Bearbeiter einen Fehler gemacht, als ich die beiden Punkte entfernt habe. Kannst du die beiden Punkte wieder einfügen? Ich weiß nicht wie das geht. Sorry und vielen Dank für deine Hilfe,
BC168 (2025-11-09 04:15:45+00:00): Done, danke für die Rückmeldung. Es sollte jetzt alles wieder da sein.

ÖPNV-Mapping ist eine Wissenschaft für sich, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:%C3%96ffentlicher_Verkehr . Da gehe ich selber auch nur mit der allergrößten Vorsicht heran.

Grundsätzlich gehören zu jeder Haltestelle mindestens zwei Punkte, einmal die tatsächliche Halteposition auf der Straße, und dann der Wartebereich neben der Straße bzw. auf dem Bürgersteig.

D.h. eine Haltestelle mit jeweils einem Halt pro Fahrtrichtung = 4 Einträge in OSM. Je nach Renderer kann es nun sein, dass nur die beiden Haltepositionen oder nur die beiden Wartebereiche oder aber alle vier Punkte auf der Karte dargestellt werden. Das kann eventuell verwirren.
user_489371 (2025-11-09 15:13:53+00:00): Ich danke dir und werde demnächst beim ÖPNV-Mapping vorsichtiger sein.
user_5359 (2025-11-06 07:20:09+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/4875841181 (a shop) more than 100 meters. Please check the correct position. If you need help, you are welcome!
HelpingCitizen (2025-11-07 06:25:30+00:00): yes i would like help undoing the shop
user_5359 (2025-11-07 07:23:35+00:00): Done with https://www.osm.org/changeset/174319679. You are welcome!
joost schouppe (2025-11-06 11:04:06+00:00): Reverted, see osm.org/changeset/174266886
joost schouppe (2025-11-06 11:03:39+00:00): Reverted, see osm.org/changeset/174266886
aharvey (2026-07-17 04:11:05+00:00): access=no means nobody can access it, did you mean access=private that only those like the owner and those with permission can use it? That said it looks like this is a public road, but if gates have been built or signage indicates it cannot be used then access=private could apply.
user_5359 (2025-11-06 07:17:07+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You add only a node without any information.
joost schouppe (2025-11-06 11:03:14+00:00): Reverted, see osm.org/changeset/174266886
joost schouppe (2025-11-06 11:02:50+00:00): Reverted, see osm.org/changeset/174266886
joost schouppe (2025-11-06 11:02:23+00:00): Reverted, see osm.org/changeset/174266886
joost schouppe (2025-11-06 11:02:03+00:00): Reverted, see osm.org/changeset/174266886
joost schouppe (2025-11-06 11:01:37+00:00): Reverted, see osm.org/changeset/174266886
joost schouppe (2025-11-06 11:01:19+00:00): Reverted, see osm.org/changeset/174266886
joost schouppe (2025-11-06 11:00:46+00:00): Reverted, see osm.org/changeset/174266886
joost schouppe (2025-11-06 11:00:22+00:00): Reverted, see osm.org/changeset/174266886
joost schouppe (2025-11-06 10:59:58+00:00): Reverted, see osm.org/changeset/174266886
joost schouppe (2025-11-06 10:59:29+00:00): Reverted, see osm.org/changeset/174266886
joost schouppe (2025-11-06 10:59:21+00:00): Reverted, see osm.org/changeset/174266886
joost schouppe (2025-11-06 10:53:07+00:00): Reverted, see osm.org/changeset/174266886
Stewartriddle (2025-11-06 02:53:31+00:00): Thanks heaps - the instructions i found were not overly helpful in doing what i needed - much appreciated
joost schouppe (2025-11-06 10:52:58+00:00): Reverted, see osm.org/changeset/174266886
joost schouppe (2025-11-06 10:52:31+00:00): Reverted, see osm.org/changeset/174266886
joost schouppe (2025-11-06 10:51:54+00:00): Reverted, see osm.org/changeset/174266886
joost schouppe (2025-11-06 10:51:43+00:00): Reverted, see osm.org/changeset/174266886
joost schouppe (2025-11-06 10:51:04+00:00): Reverted, see osm.org/changeset/174266886
stillhart (2026-03-17 21:02:35+00:00): Hi. Thank you for the supercharger! I updated this supercharger slightly. 

I suggest to check the wiki about charging_stations

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station

The guidelines have changed a lot in the last 2-3 years, especially the "socket" chaos :-)

No critique, just wanted to mention and spread the word :-)

Thank you!
joost schouppe (2025-11-06 10:50:33+00:00): Reverted, see osm.org/changeset/174266886
joost schouppe (2025-11-06 10:50:19+00:00): Reverted, see osm.org/changeset/174266886
joost schouppe (2025-11-06 10:48:51+00:00): Reverted, see osm.org/changeset/174266886
joost schouppe (2025-11-06 10:48:26+00:00): Reverted, see osm.org/changeset/174266886
joost schouppe (2025-11-06 10:48:15+00:00): Reverted, see osm.org/changeset/174266886
joost schouppe (2025-11-06 10:47:39+00:00): Reverted, see osm.org/changeset/174266886
bxl-forever (2025-11-06 09:27:20+00:00): Hello,

I do not know what you want to do but I had a look at the various "maproulette" edits which you did in Brussels in the last hours.  It looks like a quest about schools but you did not add any school, you merely added extra buildings.

It looks like you are actually drawing buildings on top of the existing buildings.  I am afraid that is is not correct.  Almost all buildings in Brussels are already properly mapped.  Perhaps you wanted to map school polygons but mapped buildings instead.

I will inspect those edits but most of them should be entirely reverted.
joost schouppe (2025-11-06 10:47:22+00:00): I'm the owner of the MapRoulette challenge they worked on. After reviewing some of the work, I'm now reverting all their edits related to my challenge and re-opening the tasks.
Mahmoud, please start smaller and get familiarized more with the tools and concepts before continuing. Sorry about all the messages your getting, but I do need to leave a note on all your changesets for tracking what happened.
joost schouppe (2025-11-06 10:44:05+00:00): Reverted, see osm.org/changeset/174266886
joost schouppe (2025-11-06 10:43:42+00:00): Reverted, see osm.org/changeset/174266886
Hypsometric (2026-02-16 01:13:00+00:00): Hi, Truck-thin. Can you explain why you removed access=* and informal=* tags from trails here? One or more of them (e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1327258560) is on private property and is leading to trails that are not approved by the state park.
joost schouppe (2025-11-06 10:43:21+00:00): Reverted, see osm.org/changeset/174266886
joost schouppe (2025-11-06 10:43:01+00:00): Reverted, see osm.org/changeset/174266886
joost schouppe (2025-11-06 10:42:45+00:00): Reverted, see osm.org/changeset/174266886
joost schouppe (2025-11-06 10:42:19+00:00): Reverted, see osm.org/changeset/174266886
nevw (2025-11-06 03:44:47+00:00): Hi, You need to add a new point or accurately draw the house boundary and add your address tags to that instead of adding them to the street itself.
nevw (2025-11-06 03:54:18+00:00): I noticed that the DCS NSW Base Map had the location so added your address. 
addr: town, postcode are not required in Australia as these are already  mapped by area and we add street names in full in title case.
nevw (2025-11-06 03:56:53+00:00): The info is in the osm database now but the map may take a while to reflect the change.
Glassman (2025-11-06 18:24:07+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174267063
joost schouppe (2025-11-06 10:41:42+00:00): Reverted, see osm.org/changeset/174266886
joost schouppe (2025-11-06 10:39:21+00:00): Reverted, see osm.org/changeset/174266886
joost schouppe (2025-11-06 10:38:49+00:00): Reverted, see osm.org/changeset/174266886
joost schouppe (2025-11-06 10:38:16+00:00): Reverted, see osm.org/changeset/174266886
joost schouppe (2025-11-06 10:37:47+00:00): Reverted, see osm.org/changeset/174266886
joost schouppe (2025-11-06 10:36:54+00:00): Reverted, see osm.org/changeset/174266886
joost schouppe (2025-11-06 10:36:30+00:00): Reverted, see osm.org/changeset/174266886
joost schouppe (2025-11-06 10:35:59+00:00): Reverted, see osm.org/changeset/174266886
joost schouppe (2025-11-06 10:35:30+00:00): Reverted, see osm.org/changeset/174266886
joost schouppe (2025-11-06 10:34:47+00:00): Reverted, see osm.org/changeset/174266886
joost schouppe (2025-11-06 10:34:18+00:00): Reverted, see osm.org/changeset/174266886
JJIglesias (2025-11-06 05:12:42+00:00): el valor de Population:source=ine.gob.bo;2016 es Correcto, la data fue extraida del documento publicado por el INE en 2016, que NO son exactamente los valores del censo 2012 pues fueron ajustados. Nunca se utilizaron los valores crudos de CNVP2012 simplemente porque el INE nunca los publico en Excel.

Ese valor ine.gob.bo;2016 está en mas de 17 mil poblaciones en el pais.
5m4u9 (2025-11-06 12:49:48+00:00): Hola, 

Entonces, en rigor population debería estar vacío, porque alguna vez me dijiste que datos de proyección no van y va también como dice en la wiki...

El cambio que hice iba en el sentido de colocar el formato sugerido de la wiki "INE <año>", pero lo volveré a restaurar.

Buscando hay 12mil y otros formatos... https://taginfo.geofabrik.de/south-america:bolivia/keys/source%3Apopulation#values

Soy de la idea de "uniformizar" estas etiquetas (population:date, source:population) aunque sea de proyección, pero añadiendo la etiqueta note para que "veamos" cuando se edita, con un texto con la explicación que me dices.

Uno de estos días tengo que ir muy cerca del INE cochabamba, pasaré a preguntar si tienen otra info no publicada. En los PTDIs los municipios separan población rural y urbana del 2012 y su fuente dice INE 2012...
JJIglesias (2025-11-11 03:14:03+00:00): Saludos.
Es que lo publicado fue ajustado, pero sigue siendo Data Oficial del INE, de hecho es la unica disponible y publicada en Excel con respecto al Censo del 2012. Solo que ese ajuste fue entre el INE y el IGM por los nombres y localizacion de ciertas poblaciones, que aun siguen estando mal en 2024.

El Tag Population=(Valor) se ira reemplazando por los datos del CPV2024 paulativamente. Por ejemplo ya el Municipio Padilla en Chuquisaca tiene prácticamente todas sus poblaciónes con datos del Censo 2024, sin borrar los datos del CNPV2012 que quedaron como Population:2012=(Valor).

Como todo lo publicado hasta ahora por el INE son fichas individuales en PDF, sin Coordenadas es muy engorroso ese trabajo. Use Padilla simplemente con un ejemplo. Tambien hay algo hecho en el Municipio de Pailon en SCZ.

Saludos
joost schouppe (2025-11-06 10:33:59+00:00): Reverted, see osm.org/changeset/174266886
joost schouppe (2025-11-06 10:33:17+00:00): Reverted, see osm.org/changeset/174266886
joost schouppe (2025-11-06 10:32:41+00:00): Reverted, see osm.org/changeset/174266886
joost schouppe (2025-11-06 10:32:03+00:00): Reverted, see osm.org/changeset/174266886
joost schouppe (2025-11-06 10:31:15+00:00): Reverted, see osm.org/changeset/174266886
bxl-forever (2025-11-06 09:37:37+00:00): ## REVERTED CHANGESET

School already on the map.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10972203050

You added a building inside the existing building.  Please do not do this.
joost schouppe (2025-11-06 10:30:47+00:00): Reverted, see osm.org/changeset/174266886
joost schouppe (2025-11-06 10:30:06+00:00): Reverted, see osm.org/changeset/174266886
joost schouppe (2025-11-06 10:29:37+00:00): Reverted, see osm.org/changeset/174266886
joost schouppe (2025-11-06 10:09:22+00:00): Reverted, see osm.org/changeset/174266886
joost schouppe (2025-11-06 09:55:34+00:00): Reverted, see osm.org/changeset/174266886
joost schouppe (2025-11-06 09:54:35+00:00): Reverted, see osm.org/changeset/174266886
joost schouppe (2025-11-06 09:53:58+00:00): Reverted, see osm.org/changeset/174266886
joost schouppe (2025-11-06 09:53:21+00:00): Reverted, see osm.org/changeset/174266886
joost schouppe (2025-11-06 10:04:38+00:00): Reverted, see osm.org/changeset/174266886
joost schouppe (2025-11-06 10:03:42+00:00): Reverted, see osm.org/changeset/174266886
joost schouppe (2025-11-06 10:03:28+00:00): Reverted, see osm.org/changeset/174266886
joost schouppe (2025-11-06 10:02:45+00:00): Reverted, see osm.org/changeset/174266886
joost schouppe (2025-11-06 10:02:30+00:00): Reverted, see osm.org/changeset/174266886
joost schouppe (2025-11-06 10:02:07+00:00): Reverted, see osm.org/changeset/174266886
joost schouppe (2025-11-06 10:01:24+00:00): Reverted, see osm.org/changeset/174266886
joost schouppe (2025-11-06 10:00:41+00:00): Reverted, see osm.org/changeset/174266886
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-01-20 16:42:17+00:00): hello!

It seems that at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/134929925/history you left an inconsistent road classification
joost schouppe (2025-11-06 10:00:27+00:00): Reverted, see osm.org/changeset/174266886
joost schouppe (2025-11-06 09:59:54+00:00): Reverted, see osm.org/changeset/174266886
joost schouppe (2025-11-06 09:58:51+00:00): Reverted, see osm.org/changeset/174266886
joost schouppe (2025-11-06 09:58:04+00:00): Reverted, see osm.org/changeset/174266886
joost schouppe (2025-11-06 09:56:21+00:00): Reverted, see osm.org/changeset/174266886
joost schouppe (2025-11-06 09:55:57+00:00): Reverted, see osm.org/changeset/174266886
joost schouppe (2025-11-06 09:47:21+00:00): Reverted, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174266886
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2025-11-07 02:42:21+00:00): Merhaba. Durağın doğru konumunu zaten eklemiştiniz. Durağı tekrar eklemenize gerek yok. Organic Maps'in harita güncellemesi biraz zaman alıyor. Harita güncellemelerinden sonra Organic Maps'te de eklediğiniz durak eklediğiniz konumda görünecektir. İyi günler.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174313998
Glassman (2025-11-06 18:27:18+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174267884
Glassman (2025-11-06 18:28:18+00:00): #TIP: square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q". Also, we spell out street name since software has a hard time unabbreviating.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174267981
NeisBot (2025-11-06 04:07:29+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description
NeisBot (2025-11-06 04:07:29+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Health consulting practice"
user_5359 (2025-11-06 07:12:12+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For a better description (if you can't find any examples or ask anyone else), please visit our wiki at https://wiki.osm.org.
I remove your entry because, it is on a parking area.
NeisReview (2025-11-08 21:49:51+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/174272654
BiblePilot (2025-11-06 04:14:19+00:00): #cwugeog
Glassman (2025-11-06 18:28:34+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174268148
Glassman (2025-11-06 18:28:50+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174268175
Glassman (2025-11-06 18:29:19+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174268354
Liam_100292 (2025-11-06 04:30:20+00:00): I'm not sure how far up the road is considered Nelson Ave.
dmjab13 (2025-11-06 14:24:59+00:00): please keep edits to one continent or area
silversurfer83 (2025-11-06 15:12:11+00:00): Hi there,

did you check in with the accounts who created the "road" keys along these milestones? Because to me it looks very deliberate and shouldn't be removed or altered without prior discussion.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174268481
Taya_S (2025-11-07 11:47:05+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174330042
Taya_S (2025-11-07 11:46:59+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174330042
Taya_S (2025-11-07 11:47:21+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174330042
Taya_S (2025-11-07 11:47:40+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174330042
Taya_S (2025-11-07 11:47:43+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174330042
fortera_au (2025-11-06 22:09:31+00:00): Hi, before making this change, did you check out each of the objects? You've marked what looks like a dirt road as highway=secondary purely based on it being tagged as road=secondary, making me think this was an unchecked automated edit.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174268528
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-11-07 04:27:47+00:00): No, this was not an automated edit at all. I made sure to check the highways before publishing them, since some values of road=* were typos (e.g., road=unclasified). Also, the fact that a road is unpaved doesn't inherently mean it can't be a secondary road (I just read the article for track roads on the wiki). Any locals who know the classification of these highways are free at any time to correct the classification. I changed most of them to highway=road because I could not determine their classification by looking at their tags (i.e., road=rural road). Also, marking them with highway=road alerts QA tools to (hopefully) alert users about what happened.
fortera_au (2025-11-07 04:38:46+00:00): The one marked as secondary definitely doesn't look as such, it looks like a service road alongside a secondary road.

I've also checked another one where road=footpath was changed to highway=footway, however aerial imagery isn't clear enough to determine whether it's a footpath, track, or just old markings in the ground.

There's also the road=centerline that have been changed into road_marking=centerline, which is both a tag that has never or rarely been used in Australia outside of this edit, and is also incorrect in the first instance I checked.

It's also not polite to just make a change like this and expect the local community to just find issues and fix them later. You should instead either try and map it correctly, set it to highway=road to be picked up later, or contact that community.

I think this edit should be reverted as it doesn't look like these changes have all been reviewed, making this an undiscussed automated edit.
Taya_S (2025-11-07 11:44:21+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174330042
Glassman (2025-11-06 18:29:37+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174268547
Glassman (2025-11-06 18:29:54+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174268619