piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mcconner22 (2022-12-31 02:38:52+00:00): I noticed when adding the Black Trail (and connecting the Climbing Trail to Gateway) that there were a lot of pre-existing warnings about gateway and the stream it crosses multiple times. I didn't make any changes because my changes weren't related to Gateway and I wasn't sure what the correct solution would be, as I think the majority of the stream is underground.
Just wanted to point this out if anyone wants to fix the warnings on Gateway.
tastrax (2023-02-03 04:26:06+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code 
+61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX
as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features  - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
pitscheplatsch (2022-12-31 16:24:08+00:00): revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123183510
Aerond (2023-03-02 12:08:15+00:00): Verkar som den här ändringen flyttade på en node så att en byggnad bytte form? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8376180373 Fixar tillbaka den, ville bara meddela dig: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133209086
charl3s (2023-01-07 16:21:39+00:00): Wycofałem ten zestaw, komenda PSP został przeniesiona 2 lata temu.
kubahahaha (2023-01-07 20:21:46+00:00): Dzięki
pitscheplatsch (2022-12-31 15:32:12+00:00): Hi,

in the past hour you made almost 85,000 map edits. Is this automated edit discussed with the community of Sweden? Thanks.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
Fringillus (2022-12-31 16:48:39+00:00): It's not an import or fully automated, it's correcting missing addr:country tags on existing addresses, which I also check for issues while doing so. I had a discussion here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/130707898
Similar mass edits have been made before with addr:country tags in Sweden. But I understand your concerns and how it might look.
pitscheplatsch (2023-01-01 08:46:34+00:00): Thanks for your answer.
Rainero (2023-01-05 22:20:34+00:00): Hei CallMeDinsdale,

you have added oneway=yes to this way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/330804670  
It has also some lane tagging, i.e. lanes=3, lanes:forward=2 and lanes:backward=1, so it is now inconsistant with the oneway=yes. Could you please check and correct the lanes?

Bye,
Rainer
EvanSiroky (2023-01-04 19:55:24+00:00): Hey there! I'm a local mapper from Scotts Valley. I see that you requested a review of this changeset. 

I'd say it looks pretty good in terms of the alignment. However, it appears that there are actually some stairs in a part of this path as viewable in this Mapillary picture (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1040872109779147&focus=photo&lat=36.973116759897&lng=-121.91576116351&z=17&x=0.3655237689180826&y=0.5726536438508365&zoom=0.6639344262295084).

This changeset could be improved by splitting up the pathway so that the sections with stairs are classified as "highway=steps".
nevw (2022-12-31 11:31:17+00:00): Hi
There’s more work to be done here
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=153.10039&lat=-26.66889&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways
DUGA (2024-08-08 23:48:38+00:00): I changed these piers back to ways as there are literally no point making them areas because all of them are small and privately owned.
Allison P (2024-08-10 17:25:41+00:00): Why make a pointless edit lowering data quality? It does not hurt anyone to map them as ways
DRYJE7YZ5U (2022-12-31 05:32:11+00:00): Sure! I'll fix it.
snopas24 (2022-12-31 05:49:25+00:00): *S Waterfront
pitscheplatsch (2022-12-31 09:41:18+00:00): Hi.

Again, could you use the comment field of your created changeset for describing your map edits? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Thanks.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-01-30 13:29:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 131881160 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert. User replaced names without giving any source for that change.
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-01-30 13:29:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 131881160 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert. User replaced names without giving any source for that change.
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-01-30 13:29:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 131881160 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert. User replaced names without giving any source for that change.
TRYPOERTNQ (2022-12-31 08:31:26+00:00): 5
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-01-30 13:29:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 131881160 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert. User replaced names without giving any source for that change.
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-01-30 13:29:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 131881160 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert. User replaced names without giving any source for that change.
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-01-30 13:29:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 131881160 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert. User replaced names without giving any source for that change.
mueschel (2023-01-08 10:39:32+00:00): Hi, 
what does 'fuel:pb' mean? leaded fuel?
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-01-30 13:28:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 131881160 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert. User replaced names without giving any source for that change.
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-01-30 13:29:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 131881160 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert. User replaced names without giving any source for that change.
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-01-30 13:29:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 131881160 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert. User replaced names without giving any source for that change.
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-01-30 13:29:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 131881160 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert. User replaced names without giving any source for that change.
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-01-30 13:29:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 131881160 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert. User replaced names without giving any source for that change.
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-01-30 13:29:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 131881160 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert. User replaced names without giving any source for that change.
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-01-30 13:29:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 131881160 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert. User replaced names without giving any source for that change.
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-01-30 13:29:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 131881160 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert. User replaced names without giving any source for that change.
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-01-30 13:29:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 131881160 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert. User replaced names without giving any source for that change.
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-01-30 13:29:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 131881160 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert. User replaced names without giving any source for that change.
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-01-30 13:29:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 131881160 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert. User replaced names without giving any source for that change.
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-01-30 13:29:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 131881160 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert. User replaced names without giving any source for that change.
zstadler (2023-03-18 07:31:38+00:00): Please use the description field for its purpose, rather than the name field
zstadler (2023-03-19 06:01:35+00:00): Please see the correctionsa I've done in the history of the node
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10296418018/history
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-01-30 13:29:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 131881160 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert. User replaced names without giving any source for that change.
StefanB (2022-12-31 08:50:43+00:00): Hey, the admin relations are not closed anymore. Can you please fix that?
Thanks!
StefanB (2022-12-31 08:53:27+00:00): Ah, sorry for the wrongful accusation on my part. It seems that they were broken before you touched them, fixing them partially as indicating in the changeset comment.
gscholz (2022-12-31 09:04:10+00:00): Please have a look here:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/130698589
seav (2023-01-03 03:24:50+00:00): Where did you get the boundaries for Bacacay? Based on various sources, Bacacay includes most (if not all) of Cagraray Island. Also, I don't think Bacacay actually touches the summit of Mount Mayon. The relation you created for Bacacay doesn't make any sense.

Please do not add any admin boundary relations unless you are pretty sure of the area it covers.
relaemanila (2023-01-07 03:33:10+00:00): Hi!

It wouldn't have been easier if I add boundaries and check the villages with a name that is inside the city/municipality. So the city/municipal boundary should cover them.
seav (2023-01-07 07:30:23+00:00): Hi! It's not really a matter of whether mapping something is easy or not. Lots of things are hard to map.

What's more important in OSM is whether things beings mapped or added to the map is accurate or not. And in this particular case, I can clearly see that the Bacacay boundary you added is very inaccurate. It's better to leave things unmapped or incomplete than adding things that are wildly inaccurate.
relaemanila (2023-01-07 09:58:46+00:00): Hi,

It wouldn't be a clean area if you said "or delete these highly inaccurate admin boundaries" for highly inaccurate boundaries. I will stop adding more admin boundaries if that is not an option.

Thank you!
Carnildo (2023-01-26 06:49:16+00:00): Changeset has been reverted.
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-01-30 13:28:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 131881160 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert. User replaced names without giving any source for that change.
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-01-30 13:29:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 131881160 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert. User replaced names without giving any source for that change.
Carnildo (2023-01-26 06:49:06+00:00): Changeset has been reverted.
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-01-30 13:28:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 131881160 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert. User replaced names without giving any source for that change.
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-01-30 13:29:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 131881160 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert. User replaced names without giving any source for that change.
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-01-30 13:29:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 131881160 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert. User replaced names without giving any source for that change.
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-01-30 13:29:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 131881160 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert. User replaced names without giving any source for that change.
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-01-30 13:29:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 131881160 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert. User replaced names without giving any source for that change.
pitscheplatsch (2022-12-31 09:41:40+00:00): Hi.

Could you use the comment field of your created changeset for describing your map edits? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Thanks.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
parsd51 (2023-01-09 17:36:28+00:00): Hej osmviborg

Wiki’en for bustrap indkluderer default det tilføjede.
I Danmark tror ikke taxaer (inkluderet i psv yes) generelt kan passere bustrap’s med udgravning, pga. akselafstand.
I de tilfælde vil jeg foreslå psv no og bus designated i stedet. Hvad tænker du om det?

Hilsen
Per
abakus_uploader (2022-12-31 23:36:39+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
eggie (2022-12-31 08:45:24+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback... Het speeltuintje is al getagd op het vlak. Dus beter de node weer verwijderen.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-12-31 10:20:08+00:00): De speeltuin heb ik verwijderd. Die staat op het vlak.
Gr eggie
Yunkers (2022-12-31 15:27:05+00:00): Hej, węzeł był wcześniej oznakowany prawidłowo - w takich miejscach stoją znaki drogi ekspresowej. Dodatkowo takie oznakowanie powoduje błędy w nawigacji (nawigacje naturalnie wybierają trunk_link zamiast secondary i primary). Proszę o wycofanie zmiany.
Szymson (2022-12-31 16:02:51+00:00): Zestaw zmian jest nieprawidłowy - znaki początku/końca drogi ekspresowej nie zmieniły lokalizacji. Tak jak było było dobrze.
Szymson (2022-12-31 16:16:53+00:00): Wycofałem
tux67 (2022-12-31 10:13:53+00:00): Hallo Simone Simmler,
willkommen bei Openstreetmap und danke, dass du mithelfen möchtest, die Kartendaten zu verbessern.
Die Carl-Sonnenschein-Schule war bereits als way dokumentiert. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23895385
Deine Ergänzung war daher ein Duplikat und ist wieder entfernt worden.

Prima, dass du deine Änderungssätze mit aussagekräftigen Kommentaren versiehst.
Eine gute allgemeine Einführung zu OSM gibts z.B. hier:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Solltest du Fragen haben oder Hilfe benötigen, dann kannst du dich gerne bei mir oder im Forum melden:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/de/56

Für eine Qualitätssicherung, an der sich alle Mapper in der Gegend beteiligen können - bitte antworte - wenn notwendig - immer hier im Änderungssatz mit der Kommentarfunktion.

Viel Spaß beim Mappen wünscht
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130712217
Szymson (2022-12-31 16:02:59+00:00): Zestaw zmian jest nieprawidłowy - znaki początku/końca drogi ekspresowej nie zmieniły lokalizacji. Tak jak było było dobrze.
Szymson (2022-12-31 16:16:56+00:00): Wycofałem
cyton (2022-12-31 08:58:50+00:00): Thank you! I didn't even have time enough to bike home and do it myself.

I was annoyed that osmand routed me through this bit, since I set it to not use any cobblestone streets.
Ygramul (2022-12-31 09:05:41+00:00): Might take a while for OSMand to pick up that change, though ;-)
cyton (2022-12-31 09:27:41+00:00): No, with the hourly updates via osmand live it's already there.
You can get that for free too, if you download osmand via f-droid.
Ygramul (2022-12-31 09:53:24+00:00): Ah, that's nice. I got annoyed with OSMand, mostly because I don't require routing that often and I only could download so few regions for free that it didn't cover the area in which I typically am. Also I couldn't download any map updates since about November 2021. I've switched now to Organic Maps for the very infrequent case of me actually needing a map (instead of contributing to it).
seav (2023-01-03 03:15:21+00:00): What did you intend for this relation? Cagraray is not an administrative area nor an LGU, so marking this relation as a type=boundary + boundary=administrative does not make any sense. If you want a relation/polygon for the island, it already exists: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4057468
jeslop (2022-12-31 12:33:28+00:00): Hola nig82, bienvenido a OSM.
Antes de seguir mapeando, te recomiendo leer estas páginas de la wiki: 
- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Gu%C3%ADa_de_principiantes
- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres
- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Edificios

En este conjunto de cambios has puesto unn etiqueta name descriptiva (los edificios no se llaman así, están en fase de construcción) y hay una etiqueta (building=construction) que recoge esto.

Lo corrijo.

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
Dodko (2022-12-31 11:36:52+00:00): Adresa prevádzky už existuje na budove https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/57896681 preto na POI bode ju netreba nechávať duplicitne.
Aplikácie si adresu prevezmú z budovy.
eggie (2022-12-31 10:18:28+00:00): Dag 81 

Get gedeelte op de openbare weg zal zeker niet access=private zijn en waarschijnlijk ook geen oneway=yes


De uitrit van het terrein idemdito.
Daar is een fietsverbinding.. die volgens mij oneway=no is dus tot het fietspad zal het ook geen oneway=yes zijn en ook geen access=private.

Denk dus wegen splitsen en accesstags aanpassen.

Kijk je nog even? 

MVG
eggie
Rienk Mossel (VRG) (2022-12-31 10:48:35+00:00): Aah oke, had hem gekopieerd van die andere. Heb hem aangepast zo bedoel je het denk ik. 

Mvgr Rienk
eggie (2022-12-31 11:25:13+00:00): Hoi... Had nog even wat aangepast. Het routeerde nog niet voor fietsers. 
Mapse
eggie
km2bp (2023-03-08 23:22:21+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1110014096/history Myślę że to koniec sporu o to miejsce. Dobra robota i gratuluję wytrwałości. Choć gość z Wrocka trochę miał racji bo twoja inicjatywa z wprowadzaniem parku była odrobinę przedwczesna. No ale skończyło się dobrze. Ja za to przejadę się wkrótce  z GPSem i aparatam aby dodać jakieś szczegóły.  A przy okazji interesuje mnie ta pseudo kapliczka czy jeszcze istnieje i czy coś wiesz na jej temat do czego służy? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6894707985
mcliquid (2023-01-01 08:17:44+00:00): Hoi, geht der Fußweg unter dem Bushüsli durch? Als Unterführung?
Und der Note kann zu oder? https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3499473

Guets Nöis!
Layft Greater (2023-01-05 07:28:05+00:00): This looks like the border was slightly moved towards the occupied territories. Are you sure this is correct?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1126007100
user_177389 (2023-01-05 15:07:40+00:00): Hello, this line was created when splitting for the buffer zone which I restored. I have not moved nodes. This buffer zone could be wrong -> previous boundary line with admin_level=3 and note "boundary is approximate". The current outer limits correspond to the admin_level=8 limits you have imported, where there was overlap.
Layft Greater (2023-01-05 17:16:13+00:00): Hello let's continue here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/130237596
gscholz (2022-12-31 10:53:30+00:00): Hi cenkenj,
this changeset has destroyed the boundary relation of "Büyükçekmece":

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1275387/history

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
user_177389 (2022-12-31 11:05:26+00:00): resolved by me
SzymonH (2023-01-01 09:51:08+00:00): Proszę o poprawienie relacji autobusowych.
:-} (2023-01-01 15:54:48+00:00): Relacji nie ruszałem w trakcie edycji
Tetryk (2023-01-01 17:58:22+00:00): Usunąłeś drogi będące w relacjach autobusowych (pamiętasz komunikat?) i zamieniłeś je nowymi nie wstawiając do tych relacji. Pozostały dziury w trasach autobusów. Ktoś te trasy kiedyś pracowicie układał.
:-} (2023-01-01 18:46:24+00:00): Nie przypominam sobie bym ruszał przystanki.Jak były tak są
Tetryk (2023-01-01 19:06:49+00:00): Masz rację. Ale czy ja wspomniałem coś o przystankach?
NorthCrab (2023-01-01 21:31:54+00:00): Chodzi mu o relacje na drogach: "Usunąłeś drogi będące w relacjach autobusowych"
NorthCrab (2023-01-01 21:37:43+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7402517465/history
O co chodzi z oznaczeniem tego przejścia? Czemu tam jest ten node
starsep (2023-01-02 22:27:47+00:00): Proszę nie dodawaj roli stop dla route=bus w relacji route_master=bus. Poprawiłem w https://osm.org/changeset/130805535
:-} (2023-01-03 06:43:56+00:00): Ja nie edytowałem relacji w przystankach typie
starsep (2023-01-03 07:03:10+00:00): Nikt nic nie pisał o żadnych przystankach. Zobacz historię https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12022801/history oraz https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2114896/history
skyper (2023-01-07 13:45:08+00:00): Hallo Winfried,
zumindest die AST 7240.3 sind im GTFS noch enthalten (https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/gtfs/DE/trips.php?feed=DE-BW-SBG&release_date=&route_id=4-246-j23-1). Ist das ein Fehler im GTFS?
Bei der SWEG habe ich gelesen, dass es noch nicht sicher ist, ob die AST nur vorübergehend oder dauerhaft eingestellt wurden. Wie sieht das bei der SBG aus? Falls es noch unklar ist, sollten die Routen besser mit `disused:route=share_taxi` oder so ähnlich und `opening_hour=Mo-Su off` gekennzeichnet werden, da komplett gelöschte Relationen nicht leicht auffindbar sind.

Grüße skyper
q_un_go (2023-01-19 17:19:10+00:00): Hallo Skyper,

die ASTs der SBG (7240.3 und 7243) wurden zum Fahrplanwechsel am 11.12. komplett eingestellt. Wir fanden da kein Taxi-Unternehmen mehr, das das zu vertretbaren Konditionen fährt.
Auch Firma Rast stellte ihre ASTs zum 11.12. aus gleichem Grund ein (241, 242).
q_un_go (2023-01-19 17:21:49+00:00): Es ist ferner ja nun vorgesehen, die Liniennummern und -führungen nach und nach mit dem Nahverkehrsplan konform zu machen. Das Problem ist allerdings, dass sich da die Konzepte so alle drei Monate ändern. Da ist noch einiges im Fluss. Daher nicht zu viel Zeit in Linienvarianten investieren.
Grüße
Winfried
q_un_go (2023-01-19 17:40:49+00:00): Und wenn wir schon bei der 7240 sind:
Die Bahnbrücke beim Bahnhof Ebringen ist nun schon seit 2 Monaten voll gesperrt, es gibt nun einen Umleitungsfahrplan. Der könnte zum Dauerzustand werden. Ich gehe davon aus, dass die Brücke sich als nicht sanierungsfähig erweisen wird und ihr das Schicksal der Stadthalle Freiburg blüht.
q_un_go (2023-01-19 17:42:11+00:00): Zum AST:
Die eingestellen ASTs der SBG kommen in dieser Form definitiv nicht wieder.
eggie (2022-12-31 11:21:37+00:00): De fietsafslag heb ik ontdaan van oneway=yes..
Het zou anders nog niet routeren.
Groet
eggie
eggie (2023-01-01 15:27:14+00:00): Dag Spaanse... Zou er geen bus=yes als tag bij 'moeten'?

MVG
eggie
adas (2023-02-09 17:15:07+00:00): A może by tak trasę velostrady oznaczyć jako przejezdną (wg heatmapy stravy ktoś tam jeździ)?
adas (2023-02-09 17:15:43+00:00): Chodzi o odcinek Giszowiec - Brynów (przynajmniej częściowo).
hubzee (2022-12-31 13:32:36+00:00): Please submit changesets with smaller areas...