piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Eebie (2025-04-02 17:57:46+00:00): Het is mij niet duidelijk waar de kleuterschool begint en waar de ruimten van de sporthal eindigen. Het gaat om een vroegere vierkantshoeve die werd verbouwd en waar er werd aangebouwd en waarin de kleuterschool ook klassen kreeg.  Het gemakkelijkste is de relatie te behouden.
eggie (2025-03-31 07:16:25+00:00): Ho  I merged your info with the present addressnode.
gr eggie
jawacek (2025-05-28 09:47:54+00:00): Hej. Skąd ta informacja? Nigdzie do tej pory nie spotkałem się z tą nazwą. W ramach budowania Obornickiego Włóczykija została tam nawet postawiona tabliczka i pieczątka z nazwą Kowalska Góra
voltairovicz (2025-05-28 09:52:55+00:00): Witam. Pamiętam to chociażby z karty rajdu. Można ją znaleźć pod tym linkiem. Pamiętam że brałem udział już w 2022 i pamiętam że też tak na karcie było.http://oborygeni.pl/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/kartaRajdu2025_kociaMrzanna.jpg?fbclid=IwY2xjawKju4hleHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHuH4zFsoF47Ezg82kLy_BkmwV2t-Eg-KZuoCiTtVHgfWZkmaCnpsXw0EU9_Y_aem_dR5K6cgR7m2VdLcD4R2Iaw
Także jeśli Kowalska jest główną, może być główną, ale ta powinna pozostać przynajmniej w alt. Ponadto czytając artykuły na Wikipedii o kocich górach też są wspomniane dwie nazwy i w sumie Obornicka jako główna, nie Kowalska. Więc już nie jestem pewny jak ostatecznie powinno być.
jawacek (2025-05-28 09:58:47+00:00): Jasne. Wybacz usunięcie alt_name. Najpierw usunąłem a potem doczytałem co to oznacza. Chciałem przywrócić właśnie z nazwą Obornicka Góra ale mnie uprzedziłeś. Szacun za czujność!
voltairovicz (2025-05-28 10:00:45+00:00): Spoko, nie dziwię się że mogło wyniknąć zamieszanie ;l
voltairovicz (2025-05-28 10:00:55+00:00): ;) *
SoyJosueVerde (2025-03-30 21:23:07+00:00): Nota: Este nodo es el original, así que por favor no piencen que es uno nuevo y que el otro esta eliminado
AngocA (2025-05-05 01:12:24+00:00): Por qué se movió tanto el nodo de Bogotá al norte de la ciudad, inclusive de la parte urbana lo cual afecta la visualización y navegación.
Se había acordado que el nodo de la etiqueta place quedara en una zona libre de edificios, y que sea cercana al centro geográfico de la zona urbana, por eso se definió la glorieta de la calle 63 con carrera 50.
SoyJosueVerde (2025-05-05 01:17:09+00:00): Hola AngocA! se traslado para para mejorar el mapa, no fue intension de vandalismo, porque no lo es, es solo para mejorar el mapa, gracias por comentar
NeisReview (2025-03-31 07:10:26+00:00): #UnexplainedChanges

Hello, welcome to OSM.

Could you please clarify the purpose behind your map changes? It's not entirely clear from the edited data and your added description. Also, what was used as a source of your activity?

Looking forward to your response. 
Thank you.
Langlaeufer (2025-03-31 08:47:15+00:00): Da dort Radfahren nicht explizit verboten ist hab ich den Weg in Fußweg geändert.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164304235
b-jazz (2025-03-31 05:34:41+00:00): RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1373179979

Hello golf course mapper. The lines that define Fairways and Greens should never intersect or partially overlap each other and we noticed that they are overlapping in one or more of the fairway/green pairs in this changeset. If there is no obvious fringe around the green, the fairway should butt up against the green and every node between them must be *shared*. If there is a fringe around the green that is similar to the fairway, the fairway should extend around the green and the two objects should be merged together into a multipolygon (See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon for how to create them with your map editor).  Please read the wiki for instructions and examples of how to better map golf courses: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls. If you have any questions, please reply here and I'll gladly help clarify things. Thanks!
b-jazz (2025-03-31 05:37:14+00:00): Also, don't draw lollipops in order to get around a feature contained in another feature. For example: a bunker in the middle of a fairway. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1373179981 where you did this. The wiki mentioned above shows the proper way to use multipolygons to map something like that.
NeisReview (2025-03-31 07:10:16+00:00): #UnexplainedChanges

Hello, welcome to OSM.

Could you please clarify the purpose behind your map changes? It's not entirely clear from the edited data and your added description. Also, what was used as a source of your activity?

Looking forward to your response. 
Thank you.
mos_next_door (2025-03-31 08:34:35+00:00): Hi Alex Edits OpenSM, thank for helping with vandal edits! May I suggest reverting more carefully next time, e.g. with a JOSM reverter plugin. You accidentally deleted whole building isten of wrong tags on them. Thanks!
mos_next_door (2025-03-31 08:40:18+00:00): Hi Pascal,

I'm pretty sure Alex was trying to revert edits 164093226, 164093226, 164093226, although a bit inaccurately. Edits mentioned look like a part of a patriotic edit war due to Tigranashen / Karki village being a disputed territory. They did violate TOTG though, I somewhat restored to previous state here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164317843

Thanks for your amazing OSM tools btw
NeisReview (2025-03-31 08:45:25+00:00): 👍 Thank you, mos_next_door !
Taya_S (2025-04-02 15:53:14+00:00): Reverted vandalism by sockpuppet account

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164428006
InfosReseaux (2025-07-02 16:22:22+00:00): Bonjour Teuxe

Merci d'avoir ajouté quelques poteaux par ici. Est-ce possible d'indiquer l'exploitant, par exemple Enedis avec operator=Enedis + operator:wikidata=Q3587594 sur chacun d'entre eux s'il te plaît ?

Cette documentation peut donner quelques indications :
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Power_networks/France/Maintenance_qualit%C3%A9

Et on voit sur la carte ce qui a operator=* en vert ou pas, en violet.
https://enedis.openstreetmap.fr/projects/2021-01_poteaux/map#map=11.11/45.7737/4.3459&sidebar=

A bientôt et bonne fin de journée
MassCartog (2025-03-30 21:02:27+00:00): Please read for more information:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F
MassCartog (2025-04-18 14:14:27+00:00): conversion happened in DMs let me know if you need details.
NeisReview (2025-03-31 07:12:55+00:00): #HighwayChanges

Hello, welcome to OSM.

In this changeset, some types of highway are being added or modified by you. 

Could we know the sources that you used? Thank you.
LucasCarver (2025-03-31 23:01:32+00:00): Local knowledge, aerial imagery, cahighways.org, etc., etc.
Taya_S (2025-04-02 15:53:15+00:00): Reverted vandalism by sockpuppet account

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164428006
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-08 15:32:33+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7050375589/history

this shop=beverages and office=lawyer are next to bank, not the same object as bank, right?

can you map these objects where they are?
nleanba (2025-03-30 20:58:53+00:00): Warum meinen Edit reverten und dann denselben weg selbst hinzufügen?
Makeena (2025-03-30 21:01:57+00:00): Es geht um den ganzen Rest aus dem Changeset, es ist nicht möglich, nur einen Teil davon zu revertieren.
nleanba (2025-03-30 21:06:38+00:00): Frage: ging es um die verbindungsstücke zwischen Trottoir und Bushaltestellen, welche weggelassen hätten worden sollen? Das ist das einzige, bei dem ich mir nicht sicher war ob das sinnvoll ist (ich habe anderswo gesehn, dass die manchmal verbunden werden und im Wiki nichts dazu gefunden)
Makeena (2025-03-30 21:53:52+00:00): Wege sollten einfach gesagt immer zwei andere Wege für entsprechende Verkehrsteilnehmer verbinden (ausser Sackgassen). Also z.B. für Fussgänger vom Trottoir auf den Fussgängerstreifen oder an passender Stelle auf die Strasse, wenn das Trottoir endet. Vom Trottoir auf die Haltemarkierung ist nicht sinnvoll, von da aus führt kein Weg weiter. Klar steigt man da i.d.R. in den Bus ein, aber man kann auch an jeder anderen Stelle in ein Fahrzeug einsteigen. Der Bus ist auch kein Feature auf der Karte, da er nicht auf einer fixen Position steht, sondern fährt (offensichtlich). Wenn du das anderswo so gesehen hast, wäre das interessant zu wissen, höchstwahrscheinlich müsste man das da auch korrigieren.
Lezurex (2025-03-31 09:29:51+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1373191521 So taggt man keine Baustelle. Du hast es verschlimmbessert.
Makeena (2025-03-31 14:25:08+00:00): Ist auch keine Baustelle mehr. Fertig gebaut, nur noch abgesperrt.
Lezurex (2025-03-31 15:56:41+00:00): Warum ist es denn noch abgesperrt, wenn es keine Baustelle mehr ist? Offensichtlich ist etwas noch nicht fertig. Vielleicht fehlen noch Bodenmarkierungen oder sonstwas?

Aber ja ihr könnts besser beurteilen ich war nicht vor Ort.
b-jazz (2025-03-31 06:11:53+00:00): As discussed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163633938, you shouldn't be making your fairways and greens overlap, but instead you should be sharing every node at their border. Please see the wiki in the previous comments for further instructions on how to properly map these golf course features. Thanks.
malifica (2025-03-31 13:35:57+00:00): And yet, no comment about the rest of the course and all the obvious OSM "best practices" for golf courses failures. Comical.
b-jazz (2025-03-31 14:26:31+00:00): Thanks for getting back to me malifica so we can discuss this further. I'm not sure exactly what is "comical". There is only so much that someone can do to correct mapping irregularities. Because I don't get to them all in one instant doesn't mean I don't care about them and won't eventually get to them. If you could point out the other failures, I'd be glad to discuss them and any plans that I have for them. Thanks.
malifica (2025-03-31 14:45:18+00:00): How about all of the rough/fairway/bunkers/tees/water that are not in relationships. Except, none of these should actually be in multipolygon relationships (refer to my previous comment as to why).

The fairways that share nodes all the way around greens (even the ones mistakenly tagged as tees) are another problem. These get rendered as duplicate nodes in all of the apps that use OSM as source data.

Your work. Accuracy. If you want to be accurate, these nodes/splines need to be aligned with the most recent official elevation data, not whatever old sat image OSM is able to freely use. I've seen many splines be off by 20 yds or more.
b-jazz (2025-03-31 14:52:32+00:00): Let me try to address some of these issues in my response that I'm working on to your other comment so that we don't have two threads going. I appreciate the discussion.
grzegorz75jan (2025-04-04 00:03:23+00:00): Widzę, że Niemcy też będą cię lubić.
Mocny w gębie to jesteś ale edycyjnie odwrotnie proporcjonalny.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164305833
CRCulver (2025-04-09 13:05:32+00:00): Why are you removing footway=sidewalk tags from highway=path instances that are actually sidewalks? If you disagree with the use of footway= on a highway=path, you could at least replace it with path=sidewalk in order that your edits are not destructive of on-the-ground information.
BrummsLee (2025-04-10 12:35:39+00:00): Sorry, it wasn't my intention to delete correct data.
I must have misinterpreted something.
I'll take your advice and be more careful in the future.
FajrAl (2025-04-04 02:10:25+00:00): way 1373198548, apakah benar SUTET 500kv melewati permukiman padat? bukan 150kv?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1373198548#map=15/-6.13240/106.90929
Fizzie-DWG (2025-06-04 01:06:43+00:00): DWG revert - poor quality mapping from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167156672
eggie (2025-03-31 07:20:33+00:00): Dag KlaasJan  Probeer svp bij te taggen op de aanwezige adresnode.
De info heb ik samengevoegd met de adresnode.

MVG
eggie
Bastian Greshake Tzovaras (2025-03-30 21:50:36+00:00): Hey @raphaelmirc, I see you keep submitting minor edits for these HOTOSM tasks you've tried. 

I assume you missed the detailed feedback through the tasking manager. Could you please check there? A lot of the tasks you mark as finished have missing/misaligned buildings in them or have overlapping buildings and buildings within buildings.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-31 15:15:14+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12714733026/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop?
gurglypipe (2025-04-01 08:33:41+00:00): Hiya, thanks for your edits around Cockerham, it’s good to see people adding more detail.

However, please don’t delete existing data when adding detail. It runs the risk of losing tagging data (such as on the parish hall, or the school building), and it deletes the history of other people’s contributions to the map. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history

Also, when adding large amounts of geometry, please make sure the aerial imagery is aligned to OSMUK Cadastral Parcels before editing, otherwise everything you add will not be aligned to the real world. Aerial imagery changes alignment by a few metres every time it’s updated.

Any questions about either of these things, just ask; I’m happy to help :)
Piskvor (2025-04-01 06:04:05+00:00): Podivné, z vlaku je vidět zcela zřetelně.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164307119
Tomas_J (2025-04-01 07:17:54+00:00): Vrátil jsem zpět, asi jsem to špatně identifikoval. Omlouvám se.
stb905 (2025-03-31 12:43:45+00:00): Betreiber ist die St Aldegundis Schützenbruderschaft Driesch. Bin mir aber unsicher, unter welcher property dies bei einem "Mast"/tower einzutragen ist, habe auch noch keine vergleichbaren Einträge gefunden.
MHD (2025-03-31 12:58:17+00:00): Anscheienen gehört das ganze Gelände zum Verein der Name wäre dann an der Fläche anzubringen nicht am Vogelschießstand direkt.
stb905 (2025-03-31 13:48:15+00:00): Habe es entsprechend aktualisiert, hoffe das passt so.
rednail (2025-04-09 14:56:36+00:00): Hallo, laut Webseite ist der Besuch kostenlos, nur die Führung kostet 8€.
Taya_S (2025-04-01 11:17:26+00:00): hallo WaddenSeaMapping,

Bedankt voor je wijzigingen hier, dit gebied is heel erg veel veranderd in een vrij korte tijd.

Ik zou je willen vragen om alsjeblieft geen Multipolyon met gedeelde outers te gebruiken. Nu zijn segmenten gedeelt door meerdere objecten. Hierdoor is het een stuk complexer is om oppervlaktes te splitsen of anders aan te passen. Ook zorgt dit ervoor dat objecten veel makkelijker 'kapot' kunnen gaan.

Groeten,
Taya Snijder
WaddenSeaMapping (2025-04-01 11:23:17+00:00): Aha, de voorkeur is dan om aparte (overlappende) ways te gebruiken hiervoor?
Taya_S (2025-04-01 11:33:40+00:00): Het beste is om alleen MP's te gebruiken als er iets binnenin een andere way zit. In simpel voorbeeld is dit: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1487550 Dit grasveld bestaat uit 1 outer en 1 inner voor dat water.

Wat jij hier doet is anders. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18916898 bestaat nu uit 8 outer segmenten die allemaal ook gebruikt worden door andere objecten. 

Als iemand nu een segment wil aanpassen (zoals deze https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1373210504) dan kan dat niet meer zonder dat beide MP's aan te passen, wat voor veel werk en fouten kan zorgen.
WaddenSeaMapping (2025-04-01 13:39:12+00:00): Dat begrijp ik. Je moet dan dus voor ieder vlak dat je wilt tekenen opnieuw een volledige way tekenen? Ik dacht dat het juist handig kon zijn om geen overlappende ways te hebben.
Taya_S (2025-04-02 07:00:30+00:00): Juist het tegenovergestelde in de praktijk helaas. De ways overlappen dan trouwens niet. Ze delen gewoon de nodes.
mga_geo (2025-03-31 07:31:12+00:00): Bonjour,
Pour les relations route=bus du réseau TUB la valeur de l'attribut network est bien "FR:TUB". L'éditeur iD suggère la valeur "TUB" mais c'est une erreur.
Pouvez-vous corriger ?
Merci d'avance
Marc
Valdré (2025-03-31 12:16:11+00:00): Bonjour, 
normalement ces erreurs ont été corrigées.
Merci de votre retour !
Valdré
geisthugo123 (2025-04-03 17:08:41+00:00): Hi, und generell für Gebäudeumrisse benutzt du am Besten das Hesse ALKIS als Bildmaterial im Hintergrund.
Das ist das offiziele Liegenschaftskataster und damit bekommst du die die genauen Gebäudeumrisse an den Grundmauern (worum es ja geht) besser eingezeichnet.
Das ist dann deutlich besser, da ja die Dächer aus den Satellitenbilder häufig überstehen. Die Dächer kann man nämlich auch seperat einzeichnen wenn man ganz viel Zeit hat.
Viele Grüße
flohoff (2025-03-31 06:23:22+00:00): Moin,
ich hab den changeset hier gesehen. Ich glaube zu dem building=sports_center müsste da noch ein leisure=sport_center drauf oder? Ansonsten macht das sport=shooting keinen sinn.

Oder?

Flo
MHD (2025-03-31 07:09:50+00:00): Soweit ich es verstanden habe ist building=sports_center auch ohne leisure=sport_center richtig, da leisure=sport_center für ein Gelände mit Mehreren Objekten angebracht ist.
rednail (2025-04-09 14:28:41+00:00): Hallo, bei BfAD wäre es wahrscheinlich sinnvoller, ein Firmengelände zu definieren und den Namen einmal ans Gelände zu setzen. Fläche als https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:office%3Dcompany taggen.
flohoff (2025-03-31 06:24:21+00:00): Moin
nur so aus neugiert. Panoramas ist ja distributed d.h. es gibt mehrere instanzen - Die Panoramax ID ist global und gültig ohne angabe der Instanz?

Flo
Pieter Vander Vennet (2025-03-31 12:23:00+00:00): Correct. More info on the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:panoramax
rednail (2025-04-09 14:16:19+00:00): Hallo, hier hast du ein paar Teiche trockengelegt. natural=water sollte bleiben, evtl. noch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:water%3Dpond hinzufügen. Fishing kommt obendrauf sozusagen.
rednail (2025-04-09 14:13:05+00:00): Hallo, zum Verkehrszeichen https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12714861930. Hier gibts eine Webseite, die dabei helfen kann die richtigen Tags zu finden:
https://trafficsigns.osm-verkehrswende.org/DE
Man wählt das Zeichen aus (man kann auch mehrere kombinieren) und bekommt dann einen Vorschlag, wie die Tags aussehen können.
SteDi31 (2025-04-10 05:07:40+00:00): Ah vielen Dank für den Hinweis. Ich bin hier recht neu und sowas muss man erstmal wissen.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-04-08 22:11:19+00:00): Please don't map lanes as separate ways
j0k4i (2025-04-08 22:23:10+00:00): It is not a lane. It is a turning darsena. How do I map it then?
j0k4i (2025-04-10 00:49:17+00:00): Sorry. The translator I used did not get it right. It is not a lane, it is a left turn bay.
rednail (2025-04-09 14:07:21+00:00): Hallo,
was die Schule angeht, gibt es hier eine gute Anleitung, wie man Schulgelände, -gebäude etc. mappen kann:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity=school
TrickyFoxy (2025-04-01 13:21:42+00:00): 👋 Не нужно добавлять сокращения к названиям рек
TrickyFoxy (2025-04-01 13:31:17+00:00): И почему вы удалили остановки Лицей №23?
NeisReview (2025-04-01 05:52:54+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164311789
NeisReview (2025-03-31 07:18:07+00:00): #NodeDragging

Hello, and welcome to OSM.

Thank you for contributing to the map. I’ve reviewed your recent edits and noticed that at least one node of a way was moved. This can sometimes happen unintentionally, and it’s led to some unusual intersections or overlaps between street segments and other map elements.

Could you kindly confirm whether these changes were intentional or if they may have been made by mistake?

Thank you, and I look forward to your response!
NeisReview (2025-03-31 07:18:16+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/16431254
NeisReview (2025-03-31 07:18:33+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164312545
Supaplex (2025-03-31 08:35:39+00:00): 葉子老師您好

請問衛道荒廢泳池、週五廢話地區、沒啥用的大禮堂是正式名稱嗎？如果不是請別改動
user_5359 (2025-04-01 19:49:09+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/changeset/164311921. what is the mean of the tag build=10?
uknown-gryphus (2025-04-02 02:15:22+00:00): Hi, thanks for catching that, it was supposed to be building:levels=10
NeisReview (2025-03-31 06:48:47+00:00): Could you try to answer my question: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164234032

Thanks!
literan (2025-03-31 19:05:06+00:00): в адресе "А" большая должна быть. Исправлю.
fortera_au (2025-03-31 05:27:36+00:00): Hi, that tagging isn't needed as bus access is assumed as yes on roads.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164312377
McCarte (2025-03-31 06:14:17+00:00): Thanks for your feedback, but our transport software requires a psv=yes tag in some cases, in this case to match the south tag with the north tags.
NeisReview (2025-03-31 07:16:52+00:00): #NodeDragging

Hello, and welcome to OSM.

Thank you for contributing to the map. I’ve reviewed your recent edits and noticed that at least one node of a way was moved. This can sometimes happen unintentionally, and it’s led to some unusual intersections or overlaps between street segments and other map elements.

Could you kindly confirm whether these changes were intentional or if they may have been made by mistake?

Thank you, and I look forward to your response!
NeisReview (2025-03-31 07:17:32+00:00): #NodeDragging

Hello, and welcome to OSM.

Thank you for contributing to the map. I’ve reviewed your recent edits and noticed that at least one node of a way was moved. This can sometimes happen unintentionally, and it’s led to some unusual intersections or overlaps between street segments and other map elements.

Could you kindly confirm whether these changes were intentional or if they may have been made by mistake?

Thank you, and I look forward to your response!
NeisReview (2025-03-31 07:19:44+00:00): Sorry, I meant to comment on the reverted changeset and not this one.
rskedgell (2025-03-31 17:26:36+00:00): Hi,

Changing vehicle=no to motor_vehicle=no here may cause problems for other data consumers, as that's not what the signage means.

In this case, the signs visible in Bing's streetside imagery here ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/3528791 ) are the TSRGD diagram 953 variant "Route for use by buses and pedal cycles only". That translates to OSM access tagging as:
vehicle=no + bus=yes + bicycle=yes

Replacing vehicle=no with motor_vehicle=no implies carriage=yes. OSM-based routing for horse-drawn carriages may be somewhat niche (arguably, so is routing bus journeys after they have taken place), but we should tag to the best of our ability to reflect reality and shouldn't entertain changes which would potentially send more vulnerable road users like drivers of carriages along roads where they are prohibited.

I can see that you're trying to make a positive contribution to OSM and improve the experience of your fellow Busmiles.uk users, but you won't balance those two objectives if you ignore changeset comments.
NeisBot (2025-03-31 05:51:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam
Allison P (2025-03-31 19:38:37+00:00): Spam reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164346205
NeisBot (2025-03-31 06:15:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2025-04-06 17:58:05+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/164603249