piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:25:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:15:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:36:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse (2023-08-16 09:15:03+00:00): Hello,
Regarding https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/950012192/history , you might want to have a chat with drnoble, whose last edit here was "... Trail closed ...".
Cheers,
Andy
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:47:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
Patchanka (2023-01-18 11:40:48+00:00): salut @Emmanuel Arrechea
je suis loin d'être spécialiste de l'euskara, mais a priori il ne faut pas mettre de majuscule à "bidea" et aux autres différents types de voies.
a+
Emmanuel Arrechea (2023-01-18 12:50:31+00:00): Salut @Patchanka,
Oui tu as raison et j'avais commencé à renseigner en ce sens mais sur cet exemple, j'ai été confronté à une commune qui a mis dans sa BAN des "B" majuscule à tous ses noms de rues (https://adresse.data.gouv.fr/base-adresse-nationale/64282#12.57/43.406/-1.4105). Du coup quand j'ai importé les points adresses, ça ne correspondait plus. J'ai préféré modifier la trentaine de rues plutôt que les 480 adresses....
Emmanuel Arrechea (2023-01-18 12:51:56+00:00): Tu as même d'autres communes comme Saint-Michel qui ne mettent aucune majuscules du tout...https://adresse.data.gouv.fr/base-adresse-nationale/64492#11.45/43.0955/-1.238
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:36:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:32:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:32:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:29:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:35:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:31:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2023-01-19 04:22:07+00:00): .75 er ikke en gyldig højde.
Du mener nok 0.75
Opspin (2023-01-19 07:45:53+00:00): Det er da fjollet at den ikke forstår .75 kan man skrive 75 cm?
osmviborg (2023-01-19 14:30:09+00:00): Bare følg wikien https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:height
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:35:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:50:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:55:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:39:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
silversurfer83 (2023-01-18 08:39:35+00:00): Moin :)
Kleiner Tip:
Wenn du JOSM als Editor nutzt kannst du auch die hessische Katasterkarte als Hintergrund nutzen und hast dann direkt die Adressen von Grundstücken/Gebäuden zum kopieren (ist als Quelle gültig)

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131376511
oiooio (2023-01-18 12:44:49+00:00): Servus!

ich habe die hess. Katasterkarte tatsächlich einfach in iD eingebunden (zu sehen in den Changeseteigenschaften), danach sind die Gebäude auch ausgerichtet :)

Trotzdem vielen Dank für den Tipp, hätte ja auch gut sein können, dass mir das noch nicht bekannt ist, in dem Fall wäre der Hinweis super hilfreich!

Viele Grüße und frohes Mappen :)
oiooio
silversurfer83 (2023-01-18 13:27:53+00:00): Ach so 😄
Cool. Für sowas bin ich ja zu blöd 😬
Deshalb nehme ich ja die bequeme Variante mit JOSM.

Alles Gute
Silversurfer83
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:43:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
map per (2023-01-21 06:52:03+00:00): Hallo drellinger,

warum hast du hier tram=yes gesetzt? Laut (1) sollen dort nur Busse halten.

Viele Grüße
map per

(1) https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1057376688287757&focus=photo&lat=48.145107799972&lng=11.5602885&z=17&x=0.9162243018277876&y=0.551845829964723&zoom=2.4169347172983193
drlellinger (2023-01-21 10:45:32+00:00): Das ist auch der Haltepunkt für Trambahnen im Störungsfall
map per (2023-01-22 06:13:36+00:00): Ok, das hätte ich jetzt aber eher nicht eingezeichnet. Und bitte solche Infos im CS Comment erwähnen.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:48:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
BCNorwich (2023-01-21 14:53:02+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I just want to point out that a highway can't be access=private on a highway that is open to the public on foot. If the highways have vehicle restrictions then they could be tagged vehicle=(private, delivery or destination). The tag vehocle=private means that no vehicles are allowed at all.

I've removed the access=private tags.

Regards Bernard,
bxl-forever (2023-01-17 14:24:26+00:00): ### REVERTED CHANGESET ###

Hello,

You changeset was incorrect.
"oneway=no" was already set for this street, it means the street is confirmed to be two-way for vehicles (oneway=yes means one-way, oneway=no means two-ways).

Your change removed the oneway=no tag entirely, leaving the situation as undecided.  Having less information in the database is not desirable.

I suppose it’s a beginner’s mistake, you probably relied on the list of presets without looking at the real tags at the bottom of the screen.

We fixed it.
Gonéo (2023-01-21 21:25:59+00:00): Bonjour, je ne vois pas bien l'intérêt de la modification. Les chemins étaient biens calés par rapport à l'imagerie aérienne. Maintenant ils se retrouvent décalés à l'ouest.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131377888
NorthCrab (2023-01-18 03:29:39+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1132750137
This is not a parking lot but a simple street side parking.
adrianojbr (2023-01-18 19:14:34+00:00): Olá, Henri!

Essa rota ciclística https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15327860 é sinalizada ou pelo menos tem previsão legal?

Abraço!
yves klein (2023-01-19 13:50:18+00:00): Hallo lightfoot, zwei Fragen: 
1. Liegt die von osm geforderte explizite Erlaubnis von Seiten der source Stadt Koblenz vor? https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/03/18/benutzung-von-cc-by-4-0-daten-in-openstreetmap/?lang=de
2. Ist der nordwestliche Grenzverlauf des StOÜbPl auch durch Beschilderung on the ground bestätigt? Wird die Eifelblickhütte durch nahestehende Schilder zu einem Teil des StOÜbPl deklariert? 
Viele Grüße aus Köln! Yves
4004 (2023-01-22 23:41:35+00:00): здравствуйте, спасибо за правку,

- там и правда убрали все скамейки
- пожалуйста, указываете тип растений в спец поле для этого https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:species, а не в названии. викидата видов - species:wikidata=* 
рекоммендую почитать https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural=tree
4004 (2023-02-04 22:51:56+00:00): поправил
Livianla (2023-09-12 07:27:54+00:00): well done,https://livianla.com/
Frans S (2023-01-17 14:31:28+00:00): Hello, I review changesets to check if they are in line with the OSM instructions. Please check this document to get your knowledge of how to map and tag highways up to date. Most of the traces of roads in rural areas need to be mapped as track when they only give access to farmland etc.
In general, when highways connect settlements, buildings and villages use the tag unclassified, when you are mapping in a rural environment
Please focus on highways which connects isolated dwellings, hamlets, villages and bigger. https://learnosm.org/en/coordination/remote-tracing/
 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway --- 

YouTube video Intro mapping roads.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NzZWur1YG1k
You tagged an access road to a few buildings as a "secundary road" which means a highway which connects towns.
The tag highway=footway is only to be used in urban areas where separated footpaths are next to highways.  Just highway=path is sufficient here.
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131379545
Frans S (2023-01-17 14:24:34+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
Tag each building with building=yes. This is default for HOTOSM projects.
A: buildings are not accurate drawn
E: buildings are not squared
Your mappings show a serious offset to the imagery.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131379640
habi (2023-01-17 20:11:23+00:00): Ciao hz59

Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap!
Schön machst du hier mit und hilfst, die Karte und die Kartendaten zu pflegen.

Du schreibst hier "Nur Fussweg" und hast https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1132759349/ eingezeichnet.
"Leider" hast du diesen Fussweg über https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/200142667 gezeichnet, ohne diesen zu verkürzen.

Ich habe das im Änderungssatz https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131394790 korrigiert.
Technisch gesehen würde evtl. `highway=path` mit `foot=yes` besser passen, oder ist das Ding mit einem blauen Schild versehen (siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Switzerland/Map_Features#Cycle_and_Foot_Ways)?

Gruess usem Liebifäud,
habi
habi (2023-01-17 20:15:08+00:00): Oder ist die ganze Verbindung zwischen Hofweg und dem nördlichen  horizontalen Weg ein Fussweg?
Frans S (2023-01-17 14:13:52+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
Use the default tag for buildings which is building=yes.

A. Buildings are not accurate drawn
E. buildings not squared.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131379677
Frans S (2023-01-17 14:04:34+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
A: buildings not accurate drawn
D: connected nodes of different buildings to roads.
Please use the default tag for buildings
Building=yes.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131379735
legofahrrad (2023-01-21 12:43:12+00:00): Hallo,
bitte mit StreetComplete nur Objekte bearbeiten, wenn du auch dort vor Ort bist. Falls du den automatischen Upload der Antworten ausgeschaltet hast, solltest du zusätzlich regelmäßig die Antworten manuell hochladen.
Ansonsten entstehen solch große Änderungssätze. Diese sind störend, falls man nur in einer bestimmten Gegend Änderungen überprüfen möchte.
Viele Grüße und weiterhin frohes Mappen! 😉
NorthCrab (2023-01-18 03:22:39+00:00): Parkingi przy drodze oznaczamy jako street-side parking a nie parking lot.

Dokumentacja:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=parking
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:parking=street_side

Pozdrawiam!
eggie (2023-01-17 14:53:11+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
feedback.. Wanneer je de aard van de instelling niet toevoegd zul je niets zien op de kaart. De dubbele vermelding op de rand van het gebouw heb ik verwijderd.
MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Frans S (2023-01-17 13:57:07+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most roads and mapped. 
A remark.  Long straight pieces of a path/road can be mapped with just 2 nodes. 1 at the start, 1 at the end.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131379894
eggie (2023-01-17 14:59:55+00:00): Dubbele vermelding verwijderd.
office research toegevoegd. Zelfde vermelding buiten als entrance=yes gertagd. Snelliusgebouw hersteld.
Dat lag nu uit het lood. 
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=131379889

MVG
eggie
Pepilepioux (2023-01-17 13:45:07+00:00): Bâtiment identique : osm.org/way/1084694636
Attributs : osm.org/node/9939566912
itineris (2023-03-15 15:42:03+00:00): Hi,

FYI: Roundabouts are tagged as "junction=roundabout" instead of simply onewaying them.

Greets,
Ákos
DianaDemchuk (2023-03-16 07:44:35+00:00): Hi, thanks for the clarification.
bxl-forever (2023-01-17 17:24:00+00:00): Hello,

Not sure the whole area you drew qualifies as a legal car park, especially on the northern side
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1132763920

What is your source for this changeset, please?
SUPER HEROS 67 (2023-01-22 17:36:41+00:00): Bonjour ClasseSNT05,

En raison, de plusieurs erreurs de déplacement de point sur des, j’ai procédé à un retour en arrière des données modifiées dans ce groupe de modification, afin de repartir sur une base correcte.

Si vous avez besoins de plus d’information concernant, ce retour en arrière, vous pouvez me contacter via la messagerie interne à OpenStreetMap, en appuyant sur mon nom d’utilisateur et « Envoyer un message »

Bonne journée

SUPER HEROS 67
SekeRob (2023-01-23 13:42:50+00:00): Hi

Regrettably Osmose has not caught up with this whole or part but certainly does seem not to comprehend 'both' as well.

Anyway, flags all over the place even when new tags show to match the updated wiki schema to the T, so I'm hitting the ignore button when being flagged on something I've updated. Checking TagInfo one can see the new tag usage skyrocketing so I think many others see it the same way.

https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/parking:left#chronology

https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/parking:both#chronology

Ciao
FinixFighter (2023-01-23 17:49:18+00:00): Yes, there are a bunch, in fact I fixed a lot of parking:lane:left which is deprecated. This error in particular (about the parking:conditional) is the only I got until now.
Have a nice evening! ^^
NorthCrab (2023-01-18 03:27:40+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/919301718
Proszę oznaczaj tego typu parkingi jako street-side a nie parking lot. Parking lot to duży parking często z uliczkami. A to są zwykł parkingi przydrożne (piszę bo nanosiłeś poprawki na parkingi a pominąłeś takiego bubla). Pozdrawiam!
Gargamel_i_Smerfy (2023-01-18 08:01:37+00:00): Dziękuję za uwagę, dopiero się uczę.
NorthCrab (2023-01-18 08:04:25+00:00): Każdy nowy popełnia błędy, to normalne.
DD1GJ (2023-01-17 20:36:47+00:00): Revert. Lösche bitte keine perfekt eingezeichneten Gebäude, um sie mit etwas total schiefem und ungenauen zu ersetzen. Sollten Korrekturen erforderlich sein, dann bitte das Vorhandene ergänzen.

Please do not delete perfectly drawn buildings to replace them with something totally crooked and inaccurate. If corrections are needed, please add to what is there.
Akkurator (2023-01-26 01:38:52+00:00): Hallo ChrisFromRV,

Hast du eine Quelle für diese Namensänderung?
s.a. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86426723

Dieses Stück
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/814332606
heißt hier
https://www.geoportal-bw.de/#/(sidenav:background;lid=grundstuecke)
"Hospitalbach" und im weiteren Verlauf (unterirdisch bis zur Schussen) "Bleichebach". 
Hospitalbach ist nicht abwegig, kommt er doch unterirdisch vom 14-Nothelfer-KH her.
Und immerhin ist das die Katasterkarte von BW.
Grüße,

Akkurator
ChrisFromRV (2023-01-26 09:57:03+00:00): In einem Artikel der schwäbischen Zeitung wurde der Abschnitt so genannt. Und geoportal-bw.de als Quelle finde ich nicht so gut, dort nennen sie die Flappach Stadtbach und an der Schussenstraße fließt ein Stadtgrabenbach entlang.
Akkurator (2023-05-31 15:52:44+00:00): Jetzt heißt er also wieder Bleicherbach:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136430280
Im Kataster immer noch "Hospitalbach":
https://www.gisserver.de/ravensburg/gtiweb/Geoportal/#/?scaleat=1712,25832,547098.4348,5293923.1903&themes=PortalGrundkarte
https://www.geoportal-bw.de/#/(sidenav:background;lid=grundstuecke)

es bleibt also spannend :-)

s.a. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/814332606/history
Gh0stz0x (2023-01-23 12:46:10+00:00): In che senso ricalcando wikivoyage?
Spero non sia Wikimapia (è coperta da copyright) se nò bisognerà fare un revert
Famlam (2023-01-19 20:54:26+00:00): Dag LEAP24, dank voor je bijdrage!

Wellicht goed om te weten dat de syntax van de key 'charge' niet als €0.71 / kWh uitgedrukt wordt (en ook niet met uitgeschreven 'per'), maar als 0.71 EUR / kWh
 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Acharge
LEAP24 (2023-01-23 13:44:15+00:00): Bedankt! We passen het aan het houden het op deze manier bij.
Anil Basnet (2023-02-21 03:00:55+00:00): Wrong Mapping!!!! You have mapped a huge part of already mapped forest as a farmland. Please delete the wrong farmland.
Fra00 (2023-01-21 09:46:59+00:00): Ciao. A nessuno risulta che sia un'autostrada a pedaggio. Era infatti taggata come "trunk", cioè superstrada o strada a scorrimento veloce senza incroci a raso.
Kovoschiz (2023-01-17 14:18:42+00:00): (Sorry for the wide changeset)
rbsam176 (2023-01-17 17:13:11+00:00): This was my first submission to OpenStreetMap, what does 'wide changeset' mean and what should I do to ensure my proposed changes are accepted?
NorthCrab (2023-01-18 02:41:33+00:00): For a global scale change: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal_process
user_18305684 (2023-02-25 12:58:01+00:00): Very bad reverse : you changed a lot of good changsets with no link with type=cluster, see changeset 131195402 for example.
Clearly a mass edit where you don't understand what you was doing
user_18305684 (2023-02-25 13:13:47+00:00): What is the utility of relation 11534286 ?
Do you really think it is a cluster ? Maybe you should read this wiki page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations_are_not_categories

Could you delete this useless relation please ?