piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
dcskobuffs (2026-01-13 22:55:26+00:00): Hello JP Duran,

I see you added oneways throughout Santa Cruz de la Sierra. While this Mapillary is not very recent (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-17.774354992389&lng=-63.158886451278&z=17&pKey=543807499949135&focus=photo), it does show https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/442496835 is two way. Since Mapillary is overall limited, I am curious if you have any documented resources on oneway roads that you could share to help the community verify these directionality changes.

Thank you and looking forward to hearing from you.

Hola JP Duran,

Veo que has añadido calles de sentido único en Santa Cruz de la Sierra. Si bien esta imagen de Mapillary no es muy reciente (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-17.774354992389&lng=-63.158886451278&z=17&pKey=543807499949135&focus=photo), muestra que la calle https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/442496835 es de doble sentido. Dado que Mapillary tiene ciertas limitaciones, me gustaría saber si tienes alguna fuente de información documentada sobre las calles de sentido único que pudieras compartir para ayudar a la comunidad a verificar estos cambios de dirección.

Gracias y espero tu respuesta.
Langlaeufer (2025-01-26 14:51:43+00:00): Hallo DerNeuS,
willkommen bei OSM. Schön dass du uns hilfst die Karte zu verbessern. 
Zum Eintragen von Fußwegen habe ich eine Anmerkung. Bitte auch die wichtigsten Querungsmöglichkeiten (Übergänge) einzeichnen und versuchen die Enden der Wege sinnvoll anbinden (andere Fußwege/Straße/Ausfahrt/Übergang?) sofern man dort nicht wirklich in einer Sackgasse strandet. Anderenfalls gibt es Probleme (Umwege) beim Fußgängerrouting. Fußwegkreuzung mit Grundstückausfahrten (Ausfahrt über den Bordstein) sind i.d.R. keine Übergänge - daher kein Crossing setzen, auch wenn das der ID-Editor vorschlägt.

Für Fragen stehe ich dir gerne zur Verfügung. Grüße Langläufer
DerNeuS (2025-01-29 13:21:52+00:00): Hallo Langläufer,
danke für das Feedback und den Hinweis, ich werde das in Zukunft berücksichtigen.
Hat es allgemein einem Mehrwert, die Gehwege auch in Seitenstraßen im Detail anzulegen?
Viele Grüße
DerNeuS
Langlaeufer (2025-01-29 14:57:55+00:00): Von meinem Standpunkt aus nicht unbedingt. Ich würde das nur tun wenn sie durch Grünsteifen oder Barrieren von der Straße getrennt sind oder z.B. Treppen aufweisen
Langlaeufer (2025-01-29 15:11:07+00:00): Der Nachteil wenn man sie separat einzeichnet ist, das man auch alle (wichtigen = min an jeder Kreuzung/Einmündung) Übergänge einzeichnen muss, damit die Verbindungen fürs Routing gewährleistet bleiben.
hoserab (2025-01-21 04:12:43+00:00): I presume you're the same user as https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Leonard%20Cohen, who left this note: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4586974?

FYI see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161585445, I fixed a bunch of things you had changed in this and all your preceding edits.
swinetown (2025-01-21 15:24:14+00:00): *believe, rather
Epsilon25 (2025-01-26 13:00:49+00:00): Not intended to be deleted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161779192
rempshaener (2025-01-26 11:18:36+00:00): Hallo,
ein Überflurhydrant wäre dann keine Saugstelle, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:emergency%3Dfire_hydrant#fire_hydrant:type=*_details
Wenn ich helfen kann: einfach melden.
Viele Grüße
Epsilon25 (2025-01-26 11:59:13+00:00): Moin, ich verstehe die Verwirrung. Da du nicht aus der Umgebung zu kommen scheinst möchte ich dich bitten etwaige Bearbeitungen zu unterlassen. Die Saugstelle ist besonders.
Grüße zurück
Epsilon25 (2025-01-26 12:15:24+00:00): Man könnte es natürlich auch als water_source=* und fire_hydrant:pressure=suction Mappen. Ich schaue mir das die Tage nochmal an.
rempshaener (2025-01-26 12:23:53+00:00): Hallo,
bei fire_hydrant:type geht es rein um die Bauform. D.h. wenn aus dem (Bauform=)Überflurhydranten gesaugt wird, dann ist es trotzdem ein fire_hydrant:type=pillar.
Daher richtig: dann kann man auch bei einem Überflurhydranten fire_hydrant:pressure=suction taggen. (Und es am besten in "description" erläutern.)
Trotzdem noch einmal der Hinweis: emergency=suction_point ist in so einem Fall falsch. emergency=suction_point setzt ein offenes Gewässer ohne jegliche feste Verrohrung voraus.
Viele Grüße
aharvey (2025-01-21 09:44:30+00:00): motor_vehicle=permissive means "Open to general traffic until such time as the owner revokes the permission which they are legally allowed to do at any time in the future." see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access

It sounds like this one is not open to motor vehicles, but your tags indicate it is.

From Mapillary and imagery it just looks like an informally used path (highway=path) and not a track, in which case I'd just remove access=no and motor_vehicle=permissive
Jack Boschert (2025-01-22 05:21:41+00:00): Hi aharvey, thanks for clarifying ther permissive value. I had used that incorrectly. I've just updated the attributes of this path which can be seen in chageset 161623136. 
Cheers, Jack
felipeeugenio (2025-01-21 11:11:39+00:00): Hola. Básicamente tomó varias calles que estaban dibujadas de manera recta y las dejó todas torcidas. No sé cuál fue la intención de la edición.
En ID con la letra S se pueden dejar rectas las calles.
Por lo pronto corregiré las calles.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161582467
Semillero LATAM (2025-01-21 12:07:23+00:00): Hola Felipe, tienes toda la razón, he dejado las calles torcidas, voy a tener mas cuidado en el futuro, desconocía la funcionalidad de la letra S en ID.
felipeeugenio (2025-01-21 12:37:33+00:00): Vale, no hay problema, ya arreglé todo.
jmarchon (2025-01-21 03:59:49+00:00): Nice work, thanks for getting all this info added!
caseywittmier (2025-01-21 04:39:22+00:00): Always glad to contribute what I can. I'm a little disappointed in myself that I did not do this sooner. Been way too focused on buildings and addresses, but at least I can cross hydrants off of my "eventually" list now.
jmarchon (2025-01-21 06:39:31+00:00): I feel you. That's often how it goes for me as well.
Are you the caseywittmier on the OSMUS Slack?
caseywittmier (2025-01-21 18:25:27+00:00): Yes, that is me. I set up an account a while back and completely forgot about it. I'll have to get back on there.
Patrickov (2025-06-29 02:05:11+00:00): Your changed messed up depiction of KMB 5D!
amtplskaart (2025-01-21 13:36:16+00:00): Sudah berkali-kali Anda diingatkan untuk melakukan editing dengan memenuhi standar yang benar. Sebelum upload, periksa ulang beberapa permasalahan yang terdapat dalam editing Anda. Dalam kasus ini (dan banyak di tempat2 lain yang sudah Anda edit) terdapat 'crossing ways' dan geometri yang menempel pada geometri lain yang tidak menggambarkan situasi sebagaimana keadaan di lapangan. Mohon jangan lanjutkan editing Anda sebelum Anda berkonsultasi dengan komunitas atau editor lain yang bersedia membantu Anda. OpenStreetMap adalah pekerjaan komunitas secara bersama-sama sehingga Anda harus mengindahkan cara-cara edit yang dapat diterima oleh komunitas secara umum.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161584195
Antonio_Portiere (2025-01-22 02:11:38+00:00): jika itu mau anda tolong jangan di sertakan lokasi saya pada peta karena saya komunitas wilayah saya tidak ingin berada di semua maps tolong bilang pada ID langganan anda
amtplskaart (2025-01-22 04:02:02+00:00): Jika memang Anda memiliki komunitas lokal, silakan bergabung dengan komunitas tersebut dan berusaha mempelajari teknik editing yang benar, setidaknya perhatikan eror-eror yang muncul sebelum Anda upload.
Antonio_Portiere (2025-01-22 04:10:55+00:00): sebaiknya kamu  bisa langsung memperbaiki bukan kah sebelumnya rusak lalu di perbaiki apa kamu bisa loop perbaiki
 kalau pribadi saya si sudah tidak bisa membuat tile lalu banyak berkomentar di ranah free saya si tengsin
GOwin (2025-02-16 08:25:40+00:00): Hello there! I'm amazed by the details you've been adding to the map. Thank you.

I'm curious about a particular tag you've been using: toilets:wash. Can you elaborate with what you're trying to denote by "shower" values?
Veteraharv (2025-02-16 08:36:06+00:00): Bidets, specifically the “bidet showers” that are commonly nicknamed bum guns in English (as opposed to Arab-style bidet bowls). I prefer going to restrooms where such exists for the sake of convenience.

Admittedly, it's very much undocumented, but since it's a niche enough feature, the only discussion or any sort of tagging scheme at all that I could find on either the wiki or the forum is this one from @AkuAnakTimur:

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/water-in-toilets/84863/2
GOwin (2025-02-16 10:22:54+00:00): I suspect it was that, and we've been discussing the same in this channel: http://bit.ly/osmKombatin
Veteraharv (2025-02-16 11:06:55+00:00): Link's broken.
GOwin (2025-02-16 12:13:03+00:00): Sorry about that. Extra "n" typo. 

It should've been: https://bit.ly/osmKombati

Caveat: it's a group of OSM contributors who usually exchange in in Cebuano/Binisaya, other languages may be tolerated. 

If you're keen to explore other local, map-py communities, checkout https://osm.org/wiki/PH
Glassman (2025-01-21 03:48:59+00:00): I'm reverting this changeset. Please consult with the community before renaming Mount Denali.
Jules Bertholet (2025-01-21 03:54:19+00:00): What is the proper forum for this discussion?
iandees (2025-01-21 04:21:20+00:00): See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/gulf-of-america-gulf-of-mexico/124571
Darter_7e26 (2025-04-12 00:57:42+00:00): # Switching of data
way/275146796 is dipicted as The Rowlands
way/275146795	is depicted as "Building"
These should be switched (the other way around).
Carpool1017 (2025-04-12 04:53:42+00:00): Thanks, looks like the incorrect info was added in v2 prior to my edit. I'll update these.
SomeoneElse (2025-01-21 15:23:45+00:00): Hello,
There's actually a discussion going on about how best to name this in https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/gulf-of-america-gulf-of-mexico/124571/43 - I'd suggest joining that.
Best Regards,
Andy
Jules Bertholet (2025-01-21 03:51:05+00:00): The name has now been used in a weather advisory by the state government of Florida: https://www.flgov.com/eog/news/press/2025/note-press-executive-order-number-25-13-emergency-management-gulf-winter-weather
VoxelPrismatic (2025-01-21 04:02:39+00:00): Forum thread: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/gulf-of-america-gulf-of-mexico/124571/13
VoxelPrismatic (2025-01-21 04:04:24+00:00): And the fact that this has been changed 5 times just today is mildly amusing. Eventually, say in a month, someone will rename it, and it will be hidden under various new changes.
b-jazz (2025-01-22 17:27:58+00:00): "Something isn't renamed just because a president says so."

Well, if he utters the idea in passing during a speech, that's one thing. But signing an EO and moving federal agencies to officially rename it is a vastly different thing. I hope you agree.
Xanadu_Contractor (2025-01-21 06:27:09+00:00): https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/restoring-names-that-honor-american-greatness/
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jan/20/trump-executive-order-gulf-mexico

"(b)  Within 30 days of the date of this order, the Secretary of the Interior shall, consistent with 43 U.S.C. 364 through 364f, reinstate the name 'Mount McKinley.'  The Secretary shall subsequently update the Geographic Names Information System (GNIS) to reflect the renaming and reinstatement of Mount McKinley.  The national park area surrounding Mount McKinley shall retain the name Denali National Park and Preserve."

The order is signed, and the territory is not disputed.
iandees (2025-01-21 15:23:23+00:00): Please see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/gulf-of-america-gulf-of-mexico/124571
Wynndale (2025-01-26 20:00:39+00:00): Did you mean to use the tag service=driveway2?
txemt (2025-01-26 21:30:28+00:00): Yeah, why?
Sakari_N (2025-03-21 21:36:11+00:00): I changed them to service=driveway, as it was typo and/or usage of depreciated/removed tag.
Grass-snake (2025-01-21 15:55:46+00:00): Reverted
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161605752
hoserab (2025-01-21 04:08:20+00:00): full disclosure: I made these changes to address https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4586974, and to rectify changesets by the user https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Leonard%20E%20Cohen: 161581549, 161581617, 161581633, 161581658, 161581690, 161581706, 161581747, 161581805, 161581843, 161581859, 161581886, 161581936, 161581955, 161582000
Kovoschiz (2025-01-21 17:27:33+00:00): It's not not allowed, but something other than `=slipway` should be used. Please research before deleting others' work.
Kovoschiz (2025-01-21 17:27:52+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:leisure=slipway#This_tag_is_also_used_on_ways_and_as_areas
Nathan_A_RF (2025-02-03 21:17:11+00:00): Hi, the correct tag for this is maxspeed:type=GB:nsl_single on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/169769947. Also, why tagged as a track if paved, and why access=destination?
Nathan_A_RF (2025-02-03 21:18:45+00:00): Also, do the turning restrictions at the southern end of the road actually exist?
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-13 00:47:11+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164876351
mavl (2025-03-07 15:05:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
gscholz (2025-01-22 07:18:19+00:00): Hi GTECNIIGATA,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting ways:
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=139.35033&lat=37.98887&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=161586894

Especially way 60642141 is affected here:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/60642141

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
GTECNIIGATA (2025-01-22 07:53:53+00:00): Thank you for pointing it out.
I'll fix it.
mavl (2025-03-07 15:06:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:07:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:07:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
Kovoschiz (2025-01-21 17:48:35+00:00): `=visitor_berth` is used for a berth for visitors in facilities eg marinas. It's not standalone.
Gregory Peony (2025-01-21 16:24:01+00:00): Well done all of the buildings you added here are valid.--- Please press q to square the footprints after you've mapped them to square them as most building footprints have square corners, but it is difficult to map so precisely.--- I recommend drawing the footprints a liitle smaller than the roofs here becasue the roofs are pitched and likely overhang the walls somewhat.--- I encourage you to attend an event which you can find here https://osmcal.org/ the missing maps mapathons offer live training.--- hope this helps; happy mapping.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161587539
Sydney C (2025-01-23 17:06:18+00:00): Thank you very much! I will do this.
Kovoschiz (2025-01-21 18:23:19+00:00): Please pay attention it has already been added https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5787083212
Kovoschiz (2025-01-21 18:23:34+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1063722878
mavl (2025-05-13 15:05:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:06:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
onovy (2025-04-01 18:40:09+00:00): Ahoj,

transformator na sloupu el. vedeni se znaci jako
power=pole
transformer=distribution

viz. dokumentace:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Elektrick%C3%A1_veden%C3%AD

Děkuji.
MikeN (2025-04-25 21:54:15+00:00): Hi,  When encountering a construction area with roads under construction (highway=construction), just modify the existing construction roads to their final form, such as highway = residential.  Please do not trace new roads over the existing construciton roads.
rsitoni_Lyft (2025-04-28 10:08:32+00:00): Hi, MikeN! 
My name is Ravinder, and I’m a mapper in the OSM team at Lyft. I apologize for adding new roads over the existing construction roads, and would like to assure you that I am taking steps to prevent similar mistakes from happening in the future.
Thank you very much for bringing it to my attention and correcting my edits.

Best regards, Ravinder
NorthCrab_upload (2025-01-21 07:32:19+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5437971990
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2783125781
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2783119507
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5437888771
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/298131606
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/298130727
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/298131038
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/298131068

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eggie (2025-01-21 09:35:35+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback Op hetzelfde adres zit ook Carteam Autoservice de Gelder

Klopt dar nog steeds?


MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Oscarede (2025-01-21 09:48:12+00:00): Bedankt voor het welkom heten en de tips! 

Het klopt dat Carteam Autoservice de Gelder daar nog steeds gevestigd zit. Oscar Autoverhuur is een autoverhuurconcept wat samenwerkt met voornamelijk autobedrijven. We hebben 140 locaties in Nederland en willen alle locaties gaan toevoegen aan OSM. 

Ik heb ook een aanvullende vraag; ik zag dat Avis en Hertz een eigen categorie binnen de autoverhuur hebben. Is het mogelijk om ook zo'n categorie voor Oscar te creeren?
eggie (2025-01-21 10:05:44+00:00): Dag Oscarede

Dit zijn de mogelijkheden
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcar_rental

en anders even op het forum vragen. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-01-21 10:09:19+00:00): Dit zie ik bv bij Avis Schiphol staan
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5145917170
kadiwa (2025-01-21 13:39:52+00:00): Wieso hast du ein Gebäude in ein anderes Gebäude eingetragen?
PTK-Hamburg (2025-01-27 07:41:43+00:00): Das alte Gebäude wurde abgerissen.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-01-21 09:03:00+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12520143830

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
archie (2025-01-21 09:51:59+00:00): Hej, jag har reverterat detta cs. En park i osms definition är en "an area of open space for recreational use...). I de här fallen rör det sig om att man har gett vissa skogsklädda områden namnet park i analogi till öppna parker. 
Sedan ser du att skogsmp har vissa hål (inners) som inte är skogsklädda, men som likväl "tillhör" parken. Därför är det olämpligt att tagga sådant skogsområde med taggen park.
a_back (2025-01-21 11:24:13+00:00): Fast det här är skogsområden med iordninggjorda gångvägar likt Slottskogens centrala delar, inte som tex Svarte Mosse som är ett rent skogsområde.
archie (2025-01-21 11:44:31+00:00): Det ställs ett topografiskt villkor för "park" i osm definitionen "open area". Det räcker inte med språklig likhet "park". Dvs endast för att en area har namngetts av någon som park behöver detta område inte vara park i osm betydelse och enl osm definitionen.
archie (2025-01-21 12:22:27+00:00): Gångvägarna i skogsområdet är anlagda för rekreationsändamål inte främst för samfärdsel. Därför har man vid namngivningen av skogsområdet dragit analogin till parkanläggningar. Osm, som är en karta/karttjänst ställer dock ett topografiskt villkor för att något skall taggas som park (open area). 
Skulle man välja att frångå detta villkor så blir osm definitionen av park närmast innehållslöst.
a_back (2025-01-21 13:12:57+00:00): Den är lik större delen av Slottskogen och borde därför vara taggad på samma sätt. Slottskogens skogsdelar skulle ju iofs också kunna vara feltaggade.
archie (2025-01-21 15:27:28+00:00): Slottsskogens parkområde är taggat utan forest-taggar(https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15023830). Skogsområdet är taggat för sig (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14338340). Finns inga likheter. 
Tänk på att osm är en geodatabas och inte en språkdatabas där objekt som innehåller ordet "Park" per automatik översätts/taggas som leisure=park.
a_back (2025-01-21 15:45:17+00:00): Hela Slottskogen är taggat park, inte varje delområde för sig självt utan helheten.

Objekt 15023830
a_back (2025-01-21 15:47:10+00:00): Områdenas likhet i verkligheten är slående, skog med gångstigar gjorda för promenad och rekreationsändamål, båda omringade av stad. Så jag förstår verkligen  inte varför den ena får vara park men inte den andra.
archie (2025-01-21 16:08:58+00:00): Samma polygon, vad gäller Slottsskogen, är inte taggad som forest och park tillsammans. Det är skillnaden.
a_back (2025-01-22 06:47:55+00:00): Jaha, det är ett taggningsproblem, jag trodde du menade att området inte var en park alls. Så om jag gör en egen polygon och sätter park samt flyttar namnet från skogen så blir det mer rätt? Det är ju faktiskt inte skogen som heter SA Hedlunds Park.

Efter att ha läst på lite så är just SA Hedlunds park dessutom bara en del av Hisingsparken, så det borde vara en polygon som täcker båda + lite öppna ytor som också ingår.
archie (2025-01-22 08:54:49+00:00): Vad bra att du insett problemet. Känner du till de exakta gränserna för parkområdet?
a_back (2025-01-22 09:10:30+00:00): Det finns en karta i kommunens folder om Hisingsparken. Gränserna verkar följa gatorna kring området.

https://goteborg.se/wps/wcm/connect/7921f263-6283-48b0-962d-bd6ca0029587/Tv%C3%A5vik_Hisingsparken.pdf
a_back (2025-01-22 09:12:51+00:00): Kanske fungerande länk
https://goteborg.se/wps/wcm/connect/7921f263-6283-48b0-962d-bd6ca0029587/Tv%C3%A5vik_Hisingsparken.pdf?MOD=AJPERES
archie (2025-01-22 09:22:59+00:00): Javisst, undvik bara att "nita ihop"  gränslinjerna för polygonen med vägarnas linje. Med andra ord inga gemensamma noder väg/park.
Herrieman (2025-01-21 08:47:30+00:00): Hoi Borishag,
Ik had de openingstijdens verwijderd alleen wanneer ze niet meer klopten. Nu staan er onjuiste openingstijden in OSM. Wat mij betreft ben je welkom om ze te corrigeren, maar nu heb je foute gegevens teruggezet in OSM...
Voorbeeld: Kruidvat Markenburg (7603) is donderdagavond wel open, maar vrijdagavond niet.