piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ToniE (2023-10-04 18:16:08+00:00): Ich hab's grad' mal korrigiert. Hab's wohl missverständlich erklärt.
user_5359 (2023-10-05 08:23:26+00:00): Hallo! Schau Dir bitte nochmal den Parkplatz an. Was ist die Bedeutung von dem Tag yes=no?
grungelborz (2023-10-05 17:07:45+00:00): Habs korrigiert - sollte fee=yes heissen. Danke.
Lokai (2023-11-19 16:47:03+00:00): Hallo,

du hast fixme=continue durch noexit am  Knoten https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11171118806#map=19/49.25118/7.88750 ersetzt. An der Stelle war der Pfad nicht zu ende. Gewiss ist er kaum 40 cm breit, ich vermute, dass er bei der Lichtung nördlich davon in einen Weg mündet. Wie siehst du das?

VG
Scout Jens (2023-11-20 08:51:56+00:00): Hallo Lokai,

ich habe das gemacht, weil ich es vor Ort so gesehen habe. Es führt dort kein Weg weiter. Sicher nicht. Man kann natürlich durch den Wald, aber das ist ja kein Weg im Sinne von OSM.

Viele Grüße, Jens
A67-A67 (2023-10-05 20:10:17+00:00): Hoi,
Je hebt de Zuidbuurt weer naar de tijdelijke bypass gelegd, terwijl deze sinds augustus weer over de oude route loopt. Is deze weer naar de bypass verlegd?

Zie ook: https://blankenburgverbinding.nl/nieuws/2534749.aspx?t=De-Zuidbuurt-weer-op-zijn-oude-plek
Lachgast (2023-10-06 07:54:28+00:00): Ha, da's toch ook wat!
Fijn dat je zo scherp bent.
Ik heb wel her en der in de bewerkingsgeschiedenis gekeken en zo veel mogelijk ook recente beelden angegückt, maar deze geheel gemist! Ik leg hem weer terug!
A67-A67 (2023-10-06 18:13:17+00:00): Dankjewel! Zo'n foutje is snel gemaakt en gebeurt mij ook wel eens. Fijn dat je het opgelost hebt.

De Blankenburgverbinding nadert zijn voltooiing, dus steeds meer delen worden in definitieve staat opgeleverd.
Lachgast (2023-10-06 20:35:33+00:00): Ha A67-A67,
Dank voor je berichtje! Een hele geruststelling. Heb het weer rechtgelegd!

Rest me nog te zeggen dat ik het geweldig vind dat je zulke projecten zo bijhoudt op de kaart. Kom je naam overal tegen!
Tomas_J (2026-06-14 13:14:07+00:00): Zdar, tu (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8985075795) a asi aj inde si nespravne oznacil ze tento priechod ma ostrovcek. Opravil som.
Metzor (2023-10-04 21:39:57+00:00): Hallo Kujo,

Ich würde mich freuen, wenn du die geografische Größe deiner Uploads etwas kleiner halten würdest, siehe

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/StreetComplete/FAQ#A_changeset_made_with_StreetComplete_covers_a_massive_area%2C_why_is_this%3F_How_can_it_be_prevented%3F

Und
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Danke :-)
bxl-forever (2023-10-04 22:56:18+00:00): Hello, Bruno1460,

Again, please stop adding made-up names for cycle relations in Brussels.

"1 Centre - Bordet/Cimetière de Schaerbeek" is just your way of describing it, this is not the official name of the cycle relation.  If your intention is to create a database or an app that feeds on OSM data, please put this into the description tag or whatever, but do not arbitrarily change the name tag of objects.  Additionally, you are also doing a form of language vandalism because, in most of the edits about cycle routes, you are removing most words in the Dutch language, despite Brussels is a bilingual territory.

Several uers have tried to reach out with you over the past few days to ask you to stop those edits.
Bruno1460 (2023-10-05 06:15:07+00:00): Hi bxl-forever,
My intention is not to create a new database, only to improve the OSM map for all users.
As for the name tags, I'm just trying to align their names with the destinations shown on the signposts. Isn't that a better idea than arbitrarily deciding that the name of each relation should be the name of the network?
The translations should be perfect of course, but that can be easily improved.
Awoobis (2023-10-04 19:49:16+00:00): Z tego co wiem ciągi pieszorowerowe są tworzone z path nie z footway
Awoobis (2023-10-04 21:25:57+00:00): ...i tak zrobiłem
Pieter Vander Vennet (2023-11-29 15:43:10+00:00): Hi,

Putting images on Google Photos is actually _very_ impractical. Other tools cannot use them.

Can you perhaps tell me under what license you publish your images?
km2bp (2023-11-29 17:36:00+00:00): These are all my own photos. Other tools don't let you publish your entire photo gallery. In addition, other tools such as wikimedia require a lot of time to be devoted to describing each file. I don't have time. I also don't have time to correct all the map inaccuracies in Malta. The map of the whole of Malta needs to be redrawn. I hope my photos will help other people map better. My photos taken after 2018 were also added to Mapillary and appear in the map editor. Unfortunately, the ones from Malta are earlier without geotags. I hope you understand this.
GCerretani (2023-11-02 08:38:16+00:00): La modifica di via mencattelli non è valida. controlla sempre la cartografia ufficiale.
mini-me (2023-10-06 01:28:29+00:00): 1. Рисовать здание поверх другого здания, мягко говоря, неправильно.
2. Этого адреса уже не существует. Осталась только табличка на доме.
КириллPochta911 (2023-10-16 20:59:58+00:00): Я новичек , понял вас, по поводу того что нельзя поверх других домов рисовать . Но адрес в других картах есть , и люди в обычной жизни используют его для обозначения своего положения. как с этим быть ?
mini-me (2023-10-16 22:22:47+00:00): Сообщить об ошибке создателям других карт и исправить адрес на сайте (если вы владелец заведения).
В ОСМ нет хорошего решения для такой проблемы.
Добавил точку с адресом. Через некоторое время он будет доступен для поиска.
mcliquid (2023-10-05 12:28:39+00:00): Hi,

Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-)

One general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
pmckay419 (2023-10-09 00:57:39+00:00): Greetings. I wanted to let you know I will be reverting this changeset as the Labyrinth Rims travel plan has not taken effect yet. It will not take effect until at least the end of the 30 day appeal period, and likely not until after the 45 day period after that for the DOI Board of Land Appeals to rule on any petitions for a stay. After it does take effect, only the access tags should be changed. The roads should all still be mapped as highway:track as they will still be present on the ground for many years and can still be used by foot and horse, so access:no is not appropriate.
pmckay419 (2023-10-09 00:59:12+00:00): 'Reverting this changeset as the Labyrinth Rims travel plan has not taken effect yet. It will not take effect until at least the end of the 30 day appeal period, and likely not until after the 45 day period after that for the DOI Board of Land Appeals to rule on any petitions for a stay. After it does take effect, only the access tags should be changed. The roads should all still be mapped as highway:track as they will still be present on the ground for many years and can still be used by foot and horse, so access:no is not appropriate.

'

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142325073
Elian D (2023-10-04 18:31:31+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edits/ElianD/Improve_street_prefixes_in_Romania
Cebderby (2023-11-20 14:18:32+00:00): fiction reverted
Cebderby (2023-11-20 14:18:58+00:00): fiction reverted
augil (2023-10-04 19:31:14+00:00): wiki de yazan şey ne zamandan beri kendi uydurduğum kural oluyor?
augil (2023-10-04 19:33:34+00:00): hem yeterince geniş değil hem de sokak olarak sayacak bir özelliği yok halka açık olmaması, etrafında dükkan bulundurmaması gibi.
VanishedUser (2023-10-04 19:34:28+00:00): Wiki'de yazan şey değil, onun dışındakiler sizin uydurduğunuz kurallardır. Sitelerde duvar olmadığı sürece sınırlar sokaklar olarak belirlenir.
augil (2023-10-05 13:57:10+00:00): peki sokaklarla belirlendiği nerede yazıyor?
augil (2023-10-05 13:57:52+00:00): boş yere duvar koymamışlar sonuçta değil mi?
augil (2023-10-05 13:59:19+00:00): sokaklarla belirlemek yanlış değildir ama tembelce yapılan bir alternatifdir. en doğrusu parsellerine ayırıp multipolygon olarak işaretlemek olur ama zaman alır.
VanishedUser (2023-10-06 19:24:52+00:00): Site sınırlarını sokaklarla belirlemek idari olarak daha doğrudur, fakat OSM Wiki'de buna dair bir şey yazmamaktadır.
augil (2023-10-07 17:03:44+00:00): idari olarak daha yanlış olur. duvarların belirlediği yerin dışında sitelerin idari bir kontrolu yoktur.
marczoutendijk_repair (2025-04-28 18:13:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 165561074 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for fictitious edits
pmckay419 (2023-10-09 01:01:55+00:00): 'Reverting this changeset as the Labyrinth Rims travel plan has not taken effect yet. It will not take effect until at least the end of the 30 day appeal period, and likely not until after the 45 day period after that for the DOI Board of Land Appeals to rule on any petitions for a stay. After it does take effect, only the access tags should be changed. The roads should all still be mapped as highway:track as they will still be present on the ground for many years and can still be used by foot and horse, so access:no is not appropriate.

'

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142325184
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2023-10-05 02:26:51+00:00): 您好，感谢您对边境地区的维护和巡查，虽然但是，单纯一个“test”做changeset comment很容易引起注意的，比如我就被osmcha里面的watchlist召唤来了，下次记得还是尽量写明白做了什么比较好！（尤其是避免单纯的“test”、“测试”‘、“更新”、“完善”之类）
比如这个changeset就可以写“删除已经在复合多边形中成员的冗余标签”之类
感谢理解！
woodpeck_repair (2023-11-06 10:59:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 143687914, 143687898, 143687891, 143687921 where the changeset comment is: Entfernung von Edits eines selbst-gelöschten Users
woodpeck_repair (2023-11-06 11:01:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 143688019, 143688024, 143688006 where the changeset comment is: Entfernung von Edits eines selbst-gelöschten Users
NorthCrab_upload (2023-10-04 19:30:21+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2208851067
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1213132361

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
vojtechzaboril (2023-10-30 10:41:17+00:00): Is it possible to drive from N to S on A1 motorway? Tunnel is closed and the "provvisoria" road is also closed?
Thanks for answer.
vojtechzaboril (2023-10-30 10:43:02+00:00): I also created a note about it.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3964516
philippec (2023-10-20 00:37:51+00:00): Dat is toch Duffel ?
woodpeck_repair (2023-11-06 11:01:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 143688019, 143688024, 143688006 where the changeset comment is: Entfernung von Edits eines selbst-gelöschten Users
augil (2023-10-04 19:39:51+00:00): yaya yolu ve yürüyüş yolu arasındaki en büyük fark genişlikleridir. binaların girişinde bulunan yollardan da anlaşıldığı gibi sokak demek için yeterince geniş değil.
jmarchon (2023-10-05 18:11:16+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM!
gscholz (2023-10-08 07:03:05+00:00): Hi GEOG281_Lewis_Riley,
this changeset has created several errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting and overlapping lines:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=20.87576&lat=32.49850&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=20.87576&lat=32.49850&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas%2Cislands%2Cislands_car%2Cislands_bicycle%2Cislands_all%2Csnap_points%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1%2Cunconnected_open_ends_2%2Cunconnected_open_ends_3%2Cunconnected_open_ends_4%2Cunconnected_open_ends_5%2Cunconnected_open_ends_6%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas%2Cislands%2Cislands_car%2Cislands_bicycle%2Cislands_all%2Csnap_points%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1%2Cunconnected_open_ends_2%2Cunconnected_open_ends_3%2Cunconnected_open_ends_4%2Cunconnected_open_ends_5%2Cunconnected_open_ends_6

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=142161796

As you may know, this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps.

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
silversurfer83 (2023-10-04 20:39:34+00:00): Moin :)

ich beschäftige mich auch gerade mit (legalen, vielleicht auch professionell angelegten) mtb trails und deren sauberen tagging.
Du hast hier zum einen "leisure=track" und zum anderen (wie im Wiki auch dokumentiert) "highway=path" genutzt. 
Gibt's spezielle Gründe für deine Unterscheidung?

Wer unterhält denn diesen Park? 

Würde mich über Rückmeldung und Austausch freuen

silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142161804
silversurfer83 (2023-10-13 21:56:31+00:00): Hallo nochmal

hast du meine Nachricht gelesen?

Grüße
silversurfer83
ol4f (2023-11-15 19:01:45+00:00): Hallo alle,

ich würde mich der Frage gerne anschließen. Es wird auch an anderer Stelle diskutiert: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/wie-mappt-man-mtb-trails-in-einem-trailpark/94438

Der Vorteil der Lösung aus der Wiki mit highway=path würde auch z.b. besser in komoot funktionieren. Aus dem Bauch heraus fände ich zumindest eine Einheitlichkeit im Trailpark sinnvoll.
Grüße
silversurfer83 (2023-11-15 19:21:25+00:00): Moin ol4f,

die Diskussion müsste man eigentlich nochmal aufmachen, da seit einiger Zeit Ruhe herrscht. Und bei komoot suche ich noch einen Ansprechpartner um genau über das Thema zu sprechen...
hol (2026-01-06 12:11:34+00:00): Hi, sorry, dass ich die Nachricht übersehen habe.
 Ich habe mich damals an bestehenden Bikeparks (Willingen & Co) orientiert. 
Ich halte eine Einheitlichkeit für gut – was meistens ein Prozess ist.

Allerdings sollte man nicht für ein Backend (Viewer/Komoot) taggen, sondern für konsistente Daten.

Die Anlage am Hohen Gras liegt inzwischen irgendwo zwischen Trailpark (frei nutzbar) und Bikepark (kommerziell mit Lift).
Schöne Grüße
aTarom (2023-10-07 14:46:10+00:00): Hi, tienes la fuente de las "ele" please? tengo dudas de estos dos, con las curvas de nivel del IGN hay mucha diferencia
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1308758332/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1260548522/history
Saludos
Hugoren Martinako (2023-10-07 15:33:37+00:00): Centro de descargas del IGN - > Mapas Vectoriales - > BTN-POI - > Capa de Orografia

Solo hice un matcheo por nombre, así que existe la posibilidad de que haya otro elemento en ese dataset, también en sevilla provincia, con el mismo nombre.
aTarom (2023-10-07 15:41:52+00:00): Ok, me lo apunto para pendientes, gracias
jb54osm (2023-10-04 21:08:05+00:00): Dag Tom,

Ik heb wat schade door sloten en duikers dwars over en onder de N14 hersteld. Als je iD gebruikt moet je goed opletten dat je geen onderdelen (nodes, lijnen, vlakken (zoals gebouwen) verschuift. Je krijgt dan waarschijnlijk ook veel waarschuwingen te zien.
Toch: veel plezier verder met OSM.
eggie (2023-10-04 21:29:11+00:00): Tom Hier kun je zien waar het 'fout' ging
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=142162115
MVG
eggie
jb54osm (2023-10-04 21:34:34+00:00): Dag Tom,

Je hebt 1 adresnode, waarschijnlijk ook verschoven, van extra, dubbele gegevens voorzien. Adresnodes komen uit het systeem van het Kadaster BAG en zijn bijna per definitie goed. Ook hersteld.
jb54osm (2023-10-04 21:40:44+00:00): En hier de herstelling: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=142164361
(Ik heb de node met de hand terug geschoven, geschoond en toen het rijtje opnieuw uitgelijnd met "s")
BromBrom (2023-10-05 06:43:35+00:00): Dag jb54osm en eggie,

Hartelijk dank voor uw bewerkingen en begeleiding. Dit waren mijn allereerste bijdragen en het is geweldig om jullie hulp te hebben. Nu weet ik dat ik het risico loop dingen te verplaatsen als ik door de kaart navigeer met klikken en slepen. Het is beter om in plaats daarvan het toetsenbord te gebruiken. Ik zal op waarschuwingen letten. Ik zal ook kijken of JOSM het bewerken eenvoudiger en efficiënter maakt.
eggie (2023-10-05 07:06:20+00:00): Tom,
JOSM is een aanrader.. Je schuift dan met de rechter muistoets,
Bij iD selecteer je met links, maar schuiven doe je er ook mee. Heb je dan iets per abuis geselecteerd dan schuift alles met die node mee en ook wat er aan vast zit. 

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/editor-josm-stap-voor-stap/75047

Mapse,
eggie
jb54osm (2023-10-05 11:31:08+00:00): "Het is beter om in plaats daarvan het toetsenbord te gebruiken."
Verhip 👏😀!
blacx (2023-10-05 12:27:59+00:00): el -2023 es posa al al tag, no al valor
blacx (2023-10-06 04:00:41+00:00): També t'has deixat d'arreglar un parell de carrers i has trencat la lina de bus 129, ja t'ho he corregit tot.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-10-04 20:30:19+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11239847851
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/474042375

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
wambacher (2023-10-06 15:12:12+00:00): Hi, was soll das denn?
Sind die Umgezogen? Es reicht nicht, wenn du hier einfach die Adressdaten änderst, der Eintrag muß auch an der richtigen Stelle (Ort, Straße, ...) stehen.
Also verschiebe das an die richtige Stelle oder ich lösche den Schrott in einigen Tagen.

walter
MichS (2023-10-06 19:49:25+00:00): Kraftvolle Ansage. Da musste ich meinen Senf dazu geben.

Der Name allein sagt nichts sinnvolles, am besten löschen oder eine Firma o.ä. korrekt eintragen.
Binah (2023-10-07 05:45:28+00:00): Hallo zusammen, ich wollte den Standort löschen, habe das aber leider nicht hingekriegt. Das war nun so eine Art Notlösung mit dem Umzug. Ich wäre dankbar, wenn du den "Schrott" löscht, Walter.
wambacher (2023-10-07 09:33:43+00:00): erledigt
Binah (2023-10-09 06:36:43+00:00): Vielen Dank!
BelaGo (2023-10-04 20:24:13+00:00): source:https://www.saechsische.de/riesa/zeithains-letzte-speisgaststaette-fuer-immer-geschlossen-5915209-plus.html
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-10-04 23:41:22+00:00): removido, ja existe no mapa.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-11-18 09:45:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 144167231 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some fictional data in England.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15401
user_5359 (2023-10-30 06:59:50+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please what ist the mean of the key WOS? There is no other payment key. Check also https://www.osm.org/node/11238736110 (created by you on https://www.osm.org/changeset/142157252) and https://www.osm.org/node/11237390319 (created by you onhttps://www.osm.org/changeset/142691416).
Please answer the same question for the key "Muun Wallet" and "Blue Wallet".
Joeydd (2023-10-31 16:03:33+00:00): Hi, I am pretty new to this. I was asked to help add businesses  to the map that accept Bitcoin either on chain or with Lightning. The form I was using to add the listings had options to indicate which wallet they were using. For a number of entires I did, I added these wallets as a separate key. I realized I should have just added payment in Bitcoin and or payment in Lightning and stopped there. These can be removed. There’s other entries I did this as well.
Joeydd (2023-10-31 16:04:34+00:00): Payment in lightning should be added if these are removed.
user_5359 (2023-10-31 16:51:43+00:00): Done!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-11-18 09:45:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 144167231 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some fictional data in England.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15401
Jordi MF (2023-10-04 20:36:13+00:00): No es tradueix perquè pot donar lloc a confusions d'identificació. S'ha de tractar com el nom d'un comerç, que no tampoc no s'hauria de traduir si no té un recorregut històric.
joost schouppe (2023-10-13 06:32:50+00:00): You accidentally dragged the road quite a long way away here: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=142162968
It can happen, but the editor should have given you a warning about that...
Bruno1460 (2023-10-13 06:41:25+00:00): Indeed it is by accident, sorry. I suppose you made the correction already, now it is ok anyway.
bxl-forever (2023-10-13 08:29:17+00:00): Yes, we fixed it yesterday.
Branko Kokanovic (2023-10-06 16:35:22+00:00): Vidim da si dodao ovde gomilu zgrada, dodelio si im cak i ref:RS:kucni_broj, ali fora je sto moj parser ne zna da tumaci ovako spojene adrese (i ref:RS:kucni_broj), ovako spojene sa ";". Jel ti nije problem da prebacim ovo u "normalne" way-ove gde svaka zgrada ima svoj broj? Cisto da vidim jel ima neki razlog sto si ih ovako cudno napravio ili samo onako, u brzini? Iskreno, ne menja mi se skripta da hendluje i ovaj slucaj sa ";" :)

https://openstreetmap.org/relation/16436024
bxl-forever (2023-10-04 22:57:04+00:00): Hello,

Whereas your former edit had been reverted by @Thierry1030 tonight, you changed the names of cycle relations again.  Please consider the remarks that were sent to you in former changeset comments and the discussion on the OSM-BE Matrix channels.

The tagging scheme you have just invented here does not look correct, because now both languages are mixed and all name:* tags are identical.  This is not how it works.

Please be considerate of other users, and stop this edit war immediately
Bruno1460 (2023-10-05 06:46:03+00:00): The reason is simple: It helps understand the shortcut CK. OF course we can decide to use only one langage each time, fine with me. But there is an official name and it should be used (see :
https://mobilite-mobiliteit.brussels/fr/se-deplacer/velo/choisir-son-trajet/les-itineraires-cyclables-regionaux).

I don't want to start a war, just asking you to consider what's good in my proposals and propose improvements for what's not (like the combination of both languages in this specific case).
ivanbranco (2023-10-05 09:19:29+00:00): Ciao Nick,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1821127065/history
attenzione a quando cancelli POI, in questo caso hai cancellato anche il civico 32, che ora non risulta piú presente nel database. La prossima volta ricordati di eliminare solo i dati relativi all'attivitá (o cambiala con shop=vacant o disused:amenity)
nick1993 (2023-10-05 17:13:54+00:00): Ciao Ivan,
ne sto facendo talmente tanti, che delle volte non me ne accorgo nemmeno, ti so' solo dire, che in quel caso, c'era un fix me e infatti aveva ragione, quella banca non esiste piu' (dopo la fusione) e si e' spostata... mettero' come disused allora prossima volta
LockOnGuy (2023-10-04 22:43:50+00:00): Hi ڕاستی, I see you deleted name:fr here in this changeset and said that's because it's not on street sign, and yes it's correct because the language on the street signs in Erbil is Kurdish, Arabic and English, so that would be name:ckb, name:ar and name:en, but why you add name:ku and name:sdh while it's not on the street signs? You just did that in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142163972          
You also added those two tags name:ku and name:sdh in top of name:ckb to some of Baghdad Streets that don't have these languages.      
What do you suggest? Remove all names in languages that is not on the street signs in Iraq?      
Regards.
ڕاستی (2023-10-08 21:48:01+00:00): The same Kurdish names with different script or dialect.