piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
marc__marc (2025-04-19 21:56:14+00:00): Bonjour,
Merci pour ces ajouts.
as-tu l'occasion de repasser vérifier si le nombre de recharge simultanée est passée à 4 ?
Cordialement,
Marc
LockOnGuy (2023-05-04 17:34:16+00:00): Thank you! Amazing work! we really appreciate your work!
BaghdadiMapper (2023-05-04 19:28:57+00:00): Thanks! Something needs to be done about maps.me
LockOnGuy (2023-05-04 19:34:30+00:00): I agree. But the problem is its only used wrongfully in some areas of the world, and if you want to stop it that means block osm access to all maps me user around the world and some will complain in areas that user don’t add spam etc.. maybe I guess its good to discuss this in the mailing list or osm community forums..
NorthCrab_upload (2023-05-04 18:20:16+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10236253992
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10868059407

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10236253995
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10299341701
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/538905327

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
gurglypipe (2023-05-04 17:39:33+00:00): This footpath has been closed by the National Trust for conservation reasons, which is why it was removed from the map. See changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135305975
gurglypipe (2023-05-04 17:44:14+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135711366
user_16720371 (2023-05-04 17:48:02+00:00): There was no signage there last week to say it was closed, it barely gets used!. Sounds like nonsense to me unless you can provide some evidence to back your comment up?
gurglypipe (2023-05-04 17:54:53+00:00): Well the edit which marked it as closed due to conservation (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135305975) is by AWMapper, who has been updating footpaths from the National Trust GIS database over the last few weeks, and says they’re a NT staff member on their profile (https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/AWMapper).

I’ve commented on the original changeset 135290950 to ask about signage for the path closure.
gurglypipe (2023-05-09 17:40:59+00:00): Why do you keep changing this to re-add the closed footpath?
user_16720371 (2023-05-09 17:48:57+00:00): Why do you keep changing it?? Just because some random National Trust wannabe who has probably never even walked the path on here says it's apparently closed you keep changing it. There were no signs at all saying it was closed last week.
gurglypipe (2023-05-09 17:59:01+00:00): A National Trust *employee* who has been working on a large project by them to update path details across their estate has updated it. To the best of my knowledge they are not a “wannabe”. They have made significant, detailed, and correct edits in other areas of the Lake District recently. I do not doubt their credentials.

The path update project (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities/National_Trust_Paths) uses the National Trust’s existing database of path data, which I presume includes information about paths they’ve decided to close or discourage people from using for conservation reasons.

Advertising a path which is closed for conservation reasons is going to encourage people to use it, which is going to impact negatively on the conservation attempts. Presumably, closing a path on access land doesn’t always have to involve a “path closed” sign at the end of it, if the local NT employees judge that the trod isn’t sufficiently obvious to lure people onto it if it’s not on a map.
AWMapper (2023-05-12 07:28:23+00:00): The team on the ground have carried out works to block this path and to restore it to a more natural condition and it is now less visible on the ground. However, as it is open access land, we cannot stop people using this route, though we do want to discourage it to prevent further erosion. With regards to signage, we are in the planning stages of a project to improve our waymarking and navigation infrastructure across all NT properties. This will include signage. In the interim, we will make the property team aware of the comment and see if anything can be done in the short term.
gurglypipe (2023-05-15 11:49:59+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135290950 for other recent discussion and a note from the OSM’s Data Working Group (DWG) about this path.
adrianojbr (2023-05-04 17:39:48+00:00): Não se usa parênteses no formato do número de telefone, conforme https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone?uselang=pt-BR.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135710081
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-05-21 20:26:15+00:00): não coloque um nome generico como "Campo Solciety"
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-05-21 20:26:27+00:00): não coloque um nome generico como "Campo de Terra"
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-05-21 20:26:35+00:00): não coloque um nome generico como "Feira"
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-09-15 06:45:23+00:00): name=Hose Doctor
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/810268474

shop=main ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop fitting? Maybe new value needs to be invented? Maybe this data is wrong and there is no shop here? Maybe it is not a shop but something else?
dpolovinkin (2023-07-28 16:07:00+00:00): reverted by 139142487
NorthCrab_upload (2023-05-04 17:50:15+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/301988620
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1168605645

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
dpolovinkin (2023-07-28 16:02:33+00:00): reverted by 139142352
MxxCon (2023-05-05 02:22:33+00:00): Hello.
There are a number of problems with this changeset.
For one, please group your changes into smaller geographic areas, such a neighborhood, a city or a county at most. Your changes in Long Branch should've been separate from the rest of them.

Additionally, when mapping features that supposed to have straight corners, such as buildings or parking lots, after you draw that feature you can right click on it and select "Make Square" (shortcut key Q) to adjust that feature's shape, making your mapping look neater and that feature more accurately represent its real world shape.

Additionally, you mapped Abram Demaree Homestead as both a node and a building. Doing that goes against https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element guideline. It should be mapped either as a building or a node.
Similar issue with "Farm Cafe" across the street.

Also, I noticed you deleted some buildings and drew new ones in their place. Generally, in OSM it's better to modify existing features to their current state rather than delete+make new. Updating existing features preserves that object's history which can be useful to refer to in the future.

Finally, when mapping streets, their names should always be fully spelled out. "Jones Court", not "Jones Ct".

Please update your edit to correct these issues.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask.👍
Kasey1776 (2023-05-06 02:02:56+00:00): Ok
Kasey1776 (2023-05-06 02:04:35+00:00): I’ll try to follow this advice in the future.
bxl-forever (2023-05-04 20:44:03+00:00): Your changeset has been reverted.
You erased Berlaymont building and made it a landuse=commercial area… despite it is already inside such an area.
sensien (2023-05-05 08:50:42+00:00): I looked for some time to try and find a landuse remark. I still cannot see it!
bxl-forever (2023-05-05 09:15:45+00:00): Hello,

Here is a more detailed explanation about the issue.  (Sorry for not taking the time to explain in detail yesterday, I only had limited mapping time and rushed to restore the building because the changeset was creating issues.)

There are existing landuse areas in OSM.  Most of Belgium is already covered with them.

Areas where most buildings are public administration, are typically marked as landuse=commercial.  Here is the existing area:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30087343
This is the reason why using the same tags within an existing area is not appropriate.  Don’t worry, OSM may be complicated at times and we all make mistakes.
dpolovinkin (2023-07-28 16:02:31+00:00): reverted by 139142352
jodd (2023-05-26 17:53:03+00:00): Hallo,
vielen Dank für die Eintragung des kolumbianischen Restaurants. Die Art der Küche wird (wie alle Eigenschaften in OSM) mit einem englischen Wort angegeben.
Besser wäre daher:
cuisine=colombian
Kannst du dir das nochmal anschauen?
Danke, Jo
NorthCrab_upload (2023-05-04 18:20:15+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4021081665
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4234070690

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
yasslay (2023-05-06 20:52:09+00:00): Hello,

Why on earth did you split the Pepperstock Roundabout into trillions of small ways?? You also changed one of the slip roads to a trunk link road when it should be a motorway link road. This edit will be partially reverted.
yasslay (2023-05-06 20:59:55+00:00): Hello,

Unfortunately, I regret to inform you that I have decided to report this and other edits to the DWG for further consideration as they do not appear to be constructive edits. If you wish to continue making edits, I recommend you to read this page on the OSM wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history

yasslay
yasslay (2023-05-09 10:01:28+00:00): This is my first attempt revert a changeset, so if there are any issues with this revert, please let me know!

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135887537
NorthCrab_upload (2023-05-04 18:20:14+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/33847351

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-06-04 11:42:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 136929482 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some fantasy mapping in Greece.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7170
dpolovinkin (2023-07-28 16:02:29+00:00): reverted by 139142352
MatthieuMartin (2023-05-10 13:59:39+00:00): Bonjour,

Majuscules encore enlevées?
Merci de corriger

Bien Cordialement,
MatthieuMartin (2023-05-10 14:01:22+00:00): Google n'est pas une source compatible et autorisée.
Cf votre ajout dans l'attribut website=* https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10868930505
MatthieuMartin (2023-05-11 07:26:50+00:00): Ok petite erreur après échanges, je vais corriger.
dpolovinkin (2023-07-28 16:02:27+00:00): reverted by 139142352
d_berger (2023-05-06 04:11:53+00:00): Hi, bei w952386872[1] hast du die Zugangsbeschränkung von 'no' auf 'designated' geändert. Bist du dir bewusst, dass dies das Gegenteil von 'no' ist und eine verpflichtende Benutzung[2] impliziert? Das sind bei uns insbesondere die blauen Signalisationen 2.60 (Radweg), 2.61 (Fussweg), 2.62 (Reitweg), 2.64 (Busfahrbahn), sowie Kombinationen davon.

Die häufigste Lockerung von 'no' ist in bewohntem Gebiet 'destination' (Zubringerdienst, Anwohner, Besucher), in unbewohntem Gebiet 'agricultural' und/oder 'forestry'.

Kannst du dies bei Gelegenheit überprüfen?

HTH

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/952386872
[2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access
dpolovinkin (2023-07-28 16:02:25+00:00): reverted by 139142352
Bierphysik (2023-09-17 07:46:37+00:00): Hi. Kannst Du Deine Anpassungen hier kurz erläutern? hiking=path macht gar keinen Sinn. Ich nehme an Du wolltest highway=path taggen?
Außerdem: wieso highway=path dann? vorher war es highway=footway, sind das keine footways mehr?
Taunusklub | Stubenkaterin (2023-09-18 14:30:30+00:00): Der footway wurde von der Relation bemängelt. Diese Einstellung nicht. 

Kannst Du gerne anpassen, Hauptsache meine Relation bleibt so erhalten, da der Weg am Bahnhof genau endet. Danke.
Bierphysik (2023-09-18 19:04:16+00:00): Der Pfad gehört zu drei Relationen, welche meinst Du?
hiking=path macht NULL Sinn, den Tag hiking=* gibt es gar nicht...
Taunusklub | Stubenkaterin (2023-09-19 06:38:27+00:00): Taunusklub Route 009, 092 & 093 sind meine. Leider verstehe ich den Sinn von hiking=* nicht wirklich, da es nur vereinzelte Stellen gibt, wo der Eintrag einen Fehler beim Speichern der Relation gibt. Ich lege keine Wege an, sondern pflege die Relationen ;-) Danke für Deine Hilfe.
Bierphysik (2023-09-19 08:11:13+00:00): Ich verstehe nicht wieso highway=footway von der Relation "bemängelt wurde". 009 liegt da drauf und ist doch type=hiking
Bierphysik (2023-09-19 08:13:41+00:00): endet die 009 dort?
Bierphysik (2023-09-20 17:13:35+00:00): ich habs mal geändert, schau mal ob die Relation wieder kaputt ist. Für mich sieht es nicht so aus
Taunusklub | Stubenkaterin (2023-10-06 13:34:56+00:00): Hallo Bierphysik, sorry für meine späte Antwort, aber es ist immer viel zu tun & die Karte für den Taunusklub führe nur ich. Danke die Relation stimmt noch.

Kennst Du ein Tool, welches Änderungen an den Relationen (z. B. des Operator=Taunusklub) anzeigt? Wir haben so viele Wege & ich bekomme nicht immer mit, was die Leute machen. 

Sind ja nicht alle so höflich, wie Du, und fragen. 

Danke & einen schönen Tag noch.
Bierphysik (2023-10-08 12:23:40+00:00): Gude. Schau mal, ob Dir hier https://www.knooppuntnet.nl/en/ weiter helfen kann.
www.osmcha.org wäre auch eine Option, aber damit überwachst du eine Region.
Bierphysik (2023-10-08 12:25:52+00:00): Ach und https://ra.osmsurround.org/index solltest Du dann nhoffentlich kennen :)
Bierphysik (2023-10-08 16:29:23+00:00): fyi: http://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeRelation?relationId=929838
Taunusklub | Stubenkaterin (2023-10-11 10:36:47+00:00): Gude auch, danke für die Links. Das www.osmcha.org nutze ich tatsächlich im Augenblick ... aber da muß ich alles "händisch" durchsuchen, da die Haupttrigger nicht meinen Anforderungen entsprechen. 
Der https://ra.osmsurround.org/index ist ein guter Tipp, da ich hier sehr schnell den Zustand der einzelnen Relationen (es sind so ca. 100) einsehen kann. Leider informiert der nicht, wenn eine Relation nicht in Ordnung ist ... Danke für Deine Hilfe & eine schöne Woche. LG Stubenkater
Map-Peter (2023-05-05 22:51:54+00:00): Hallo ZellmerLP,
 
ein Dach ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/136064727/history ) ist keine Tankstelle.
 
Weil du nun den "layer=1" hier vom Dach entfernt hast, ist das Dach auf derselben Ebene mit dem Weg, der aber darunter entlang führt -> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:layer .
 
Die Tankstelle war voher bereits in OSM.
 
Ich habe das Ganze gerade angepasst.
 
Gruß Peter
bxl-forever (2023-05-04 20:43:21+00:00): Your changeset has been reverted.
You created a hospital on top on the existing hospital, which was already on the map since its official opening in 2018.  This is not correct.
GCerretani (2023-09-29 07:20:27+00:00): Ci sono alcuni nomi di vie cambiati senza motivo. Controllare sempre prima la cartografia ufficiale comunale su https://siena.ldpgis.it/overview_export/pub/index.php?viewer=ldp
kagebar (2023-05-05 10:25:32+00:00): шановний, я вам вже писав не приклеювати дороги до полігонів, а ви далі це робите. Також почитайте про мультиполігони на вікіпедії OSM, бо ви мягко кажучи дуже неправильно позначили багато лугів. Будівлі приклеєні до лісу до лісу це найменша біда в ваших позначеннях
user_3961131 (2023-05-26 20:40:11+00:00): дякую за поради, прийму до уваги. про мультиполігони я ознайомився-Ви праві
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-06-04 11:42:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 136929482 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some fantasy mapping in Greece.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7170
NeisReview (2025-03-08 16:07:26+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135715252
emvee (2023-05-29 18:07:06+00:00): Why did you change traffic_signals:direction=forward/backward into raffic_signals:direction=both?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:traffic_signals:direction
lipuma (2023-05-30 12:58:52+00:00): Bij deze crossing bijvoorbeeld:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/804255003

Als je als fietser oversteekt kan je op een knop drukken en dan kijk je naar de verkeerslichten aan jouw kant van de weg (niet de overkant).

Maar voetgangers die van de andere kant willen oversteken die kijken juist richting de stoplicht van de fietsers. Aan diezelfde paal hangt aan ander stoplicht voor de voetgangers.

Als je het niet begrijpt snap ik het, ik weet niet goed hoe ik het moet uitleggen. Misschien kan ik binnenkort een paar fotos maken of de situatie tekenen.

Ik weet eerlijkgezegd niet of het juist is wat ik hier heb gedaan. Ik weet niet of ik rekening hoef te houden met de stoplichten van voetgangers omdat de stoplicht nodes vastzitten aan cycleways.
aveekbh (2023-06-03 16:14:28+00:00): Motorway road appears to be incorrect. Someone familiar with the area can comment.
Cebderby (2023-06-03 17:21:25+00:00): Noting this was 1st (and only) edit from user, deleted footways, solar panels, landuse etc as well as changing area to motorway road.
All reverted back to how it was.
aveekbh (2023-06-03 17:43:35+00:00): Thanks!
Nearby0051 (2023-05-13 17:17:53+00:00): Hi, willkommen zurück bei OpenStreetMap :)

Hast du eine Quelle für die Namensänderung?
Ich habe mal auf Wikipedia geguckt und dort scheint sie noch anders zu heißen
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lanker_See#Inseln_im_Nordteil_des_Lanker_Sees

Allerdings habe ich auch keine Lokalkenntnisse
Gab es eine Änderung?
Glassman (2023-05-04 23:28:29+00:00): #TIP: under the background layer you can often find new imagery than the default. I used NAIP to better map the house at 2431. 

also - OSM got it start in England so we use British English and their road classifications. A unclassified road is basically a rural residential road. What I think you wanted is highway=service + service=driveway. I went ahead and made the change.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135714815
NeisReview (2025-03-08 16:06:42+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135715252
NeisReview (2025-03-08 16:06:13+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147216561
Violaine_Do (2024-11-25 23:34:20+00:00): Merci Maoni pour ta contribution, j'ai corrigé ta denomination en catholic (pas catholique), ce sont des valeurs normées, internationales. Merci de faire attention les prochaines fois, bon mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135715412
NorthCrab_upload (2023-05-04 20:10:28+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10865997927
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1127471790

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
tekim (2024-03-14 19:19:45+00:00): Hello, Thanks for all of the golf-related edits.  It looks like in this case you created a "rough" area that completely encloses and covers the "fairway", so in other words, the fairway is mapped as both a fairway and a rough, which is not correct since the two are mutually exclusive.  What you want to do is create a multipolygon for the rough and make the fairway a hole or island in that multipolygon.
FantomEnterteinment (2023-05-14 15:55:35+00:00): Зачем делать changeset по 2-4 изменения каждый? Можно соединять по 100
emersonveenstra (2023-05-05 10:38:59+00:00): Hi,

You created https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1168792087 which has the exact same geometry as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1168772431#map=15/44.0937/-97.1432, could you please fix that? Thanks!
SD Mapman (2023-05-05 12:55:54+00:00): Weird, iD must have duplicated all the Lake County edits I did (said I had unsaved changes when I guess I didn't), I'll check it over
CorruptComputer (2023-05-05 18:25:42+00:00): Hello there and welcome to OSM! I just wanted to ask that in the future could you please split your changes into smaller geographic regions? It is difficult to review changes when the changeset bounding box is so large.
Lejun (2023-05-07 22:09:53+00:00): Je viens de passer en revue les modifications ; Beaucoup de doublons. Le fond est là, mais à l'avenir merci de vérifier que l'élément n'est pas déjà présent.

Si l'anglais ne t'es pas familier alors il est également demandé de faire d'éviter de faire des modifications sur des grandes étendues géographiques comme tu as fait (Tahiti jusqu'à la France métro), de plutôt les diviser en groupes de modifications séparés.
Violaine_Do (2024-11-25 23:47:06+00:00): Merci pour tes contrbutions les spots de surf se cartographie avec sport=surfing. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dsurfing
J'ai corrigé pour cette fois, mais pour les prochaine merci de le prendre en compte. Bon mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135715695
mavl (2023-05-07 06:29:20+00:00): Здравствуйте. Для этого пакета правок указано, что источником данных является "Топокарта 500 м". Напишите, пожалуйста, подробнее, что это за топокарта и есть ли у вас разрешение от правообладателя этой топокарты на её использование в целях уточнения OpenStreetMap.
Vladimir_Geroev (2023-05-12 08:16:14+00:00): Добрый день! Топокарта 500 м - это карта из SasPlanet - Карты ГГЦ (ГосГИСЦентра). Карта использовалась для уточнения данных по названием рек и озер, а также наличия гидрографии и дорог. Оцифровка карты осуществляется по космической съемке с открытых серверов.
mavl (2023-05-12 08:37:12+00:00): Спасибо за ответ. А у вас есть разрешение от правообладателя этой карты на её использование в целях уточнения OpenStreetMap?
Vladimir_Geroev (2023-05-12 09:10:47+00:00): Извините за глупый вопрос. А кто является правообладателем этих карт? ГосгисЦентр или Управление по геодезии и картографии или SasPlanet или Генштаб РФ. И зачем нужно получать разрешение на то, чтобы уточнить правильное написание наименования озера или реки? Может при отправке на сервер просто не заполнять поле источника....