piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
VLD0251 (2026-07-18 12:49:56+00:00): Hi Petr Jenč,
This object appears to represent the Ras Jedir border crossing rather than a village, so "place=village" seems inappropriate. In addition, "wikidata=Q597189" and "wikipedia=ar:رأس جدير" refer to the Libyan locality of Ras Ajdir and do not appear to match this object. Finally, "name:ar1" is not a valid OpenStreetMap key.
Happy mapping!
Petr Jenč (2026-07-18 18:09:22+00:00): The small correction concerned only the official Tunisian name, not the Libyan part (Ras Jedir in Tunisia part, Ras Ajdir Libyan part)
WilliamHarrison (2026-07-17 01:05:03+00:00): Road infrastructure*
cubbe8 (2026-07-17 01:33:39+00:00): Border line cases are not meant to be altered without discussion. Also this is not undivided, just one lane in each direction.
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-07-17 02:03:16+00:00): What I mean by "undivided" is that there's no physical barrier separating the carriageways. Motorways should almost always be divided like that. From what I saw in the background, the highway has no physical barrier between its carriageways.
cubbe8 (2026-07-17 02:05:34+00:00): It has bollards between the carriageways.
cubbe8 (2026-07-17 02:06:09+00:00): Also the bollards in the median are currently being replaced with a concrete barrier.
cubbe8 (2026-07-17 02:06:54+00:00): And you still need to start a discussion before changing a borderline case from motorway as mentioned in the US Highway classification guide.
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-07-17 02:28:21+00:00): Is that true? If so, why haven't the carriageways been separated?
cubbe8 (2026-07-17 02:30:51+00:00): I don’t know, but i have driven this road many times and there are bollards all along it.
cubbe8 (2026-07-17 02:32:28+00:00): https://www.google.com/search?q=route+6+cape+cod+bollards&sca_esv=fa9b82bc780cd223&rlz=1CDGOYI_enUS1194US1194&hl=en-US&udm=2&biw=420&bih=712&sxsrf=APpeQntkmAO9eos5b_mK3NLONkoCNI7fiQ%3A1784255470443&ei=7pNZatPUGtqfw8cP_-fsUQ&oq=route+6+cape+cod+bollards&gs_lp=EhJtb2JpbGUtZ3dzLXdpei1pbWciGXJvdXRlIDYgY2FwZSBjb2QgYm9sbGFyZHMyCBAAGIAEGKIEMggQABiiBBiJBUifHlDbCFjZHXABeACQAQGYAVygAZIGqgECMTG4AQPIAQD4AQGYAgugAtMFwgIHECMYJxjJAsICBRAAGIAEwgIGEAAYBxgewgIIEAAYCBgKGB7CAgUQIRirApgDAIgGAZIHAjExoAftGLIHAjEwuAfSBcIHBTEuOS4xyAcQgAgA&sclient=mobile-gws-wiz-img#sv=CAMSZBoyKhBlLXJIbU9veGFvOTd2Q3lNMg5ySG1Pb3hhbzk3dkN5TToOUmE1M1FXaFdtWDNDeE0gBCokCg5HeUg0UlgxQXI1RXd0TRIQZS1ySG1Pb3hhbzk3dkN5TRgAMAFKBAgBEAIYByDLn6WNCUoIEAIYASACKAE

Here is an article showing them
cubbe8 (2026-07-17 02:33:26+00:00): https://www.capecodtimes.com/story/news/traffic/2023/07/09/crash-route-6-sunday-off-cape-driving-leads-backups-traffic/70395624007/
Dani CS (2026-07-18 19:31:14+00:00): Hi, this changeset created a bunch of nodes with tags entrance=* and door=* (a literal asterisk as value). Was that intentional?

(See for example node/14021170716 )
BCary (2026-07-18 20:07:01+00:00): Yes, sorry I didn't realize that was a tagging error.  Should it be door=yes, entrance=yes?
Dani CS (2026-07-18 20:15:56+00:00): That's a good start, you might even have more detailed entrance types (main, secondary, service) and door types (hinged, sliding, revolving). See the wiki if curious. Otherwise, it's also fine if you stick to "yes".
BCary (2026-07-18 20:24:27+00:00): I see, thank you.  I'll fix them tonight
tian2992 (2026-07-18 20:36:48+00:00): Por favor tener cuidado al mapear. No encaja la forma
felipeeugenio (2026-07-17 12:48:09+00:00): Hola. Buenos dias.
Buena edición. 
Sin embargo hay cosas que llaman la atención:
1) Borró una posta rural por completo? ya no existe? o se trata de un error?
2) todos los paraderos aparecen con plataforma. Eso es correcto? es muy poco comun en paraderos rurales el tener plataforma de embarque.

Solo para aclarar. Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185879517
wpg (2026-07-20 04:19:42+00:00): Hola, la posta hace muchos años que está a orilla de carretera, no donde estaba marcada. Estuve ahí hace unos días, por eso edité el sector. Casi todos los paraderos tienen plataforma de embarque.
felipeeugenio (2026-07-17 13:05:48+00:00): Hola. Todo eso es un edificio? no parece. El tag building= es solo para estructuras, no para el recinto completo.

Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185879824
felipeeugenio (2026-07-17 13:12:23+00:00): en la foto de Mapbos se nota bien el edificio. Ahí lo corregí.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185879824
lambalicious (2026-07-18 00:58:29+00:00): ¡Gracias! Por error escogí el tipo de área equivocada en el iD.
Alliegaytor (2026-07-18 00:00:35+00:00): Hi, please don't add business nodes to the tram routes! Removed in changeset/185933676
Herwescheluc (2026-07-27 07:45:21+00:00): Hallo, OwwerOrschelemProject,
kannst Du bitte erklären, was das ist/sein soll? Nur ein Name reicht hier nicht...
Grüße aus Herborn
Andreas
dmjab13 (2026-07-17 20:36:51+00:00): well at least you apologized
pwbriggs (2026-07-19 03:45:01+00:00): Hello https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/misty870808!

What do you mean by "verified NAP"? could you share more details about this data source?

Thanks!
FajrAl (2026-07-19 11:50:19+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1539931478
you can map it as rectangular landuse=grass and map the individual trees (natural=tree). This way is better for maintenance.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-20 21:33:47+00:00): As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality of your mapping and avoid consequences for your account and the features you map. See https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more information.

Cleaned up remaining SEO spam and other mistagging for POI in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/186084591
felipeeugenio (2026-07-17 12:59:23+00:00): Hola. notable trabajo.
Solo una duda: algunos de esos cierres existe actualmente? En OSM se mapean elementos comprobables en terreno, no proyectos.

Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185883497
LLALLO (2026-07-18 20:50:57+00:00): Hola Felipe, gracias por revisar la edición.
Esto fue un proyecto hasta hace 2 años, ahora todo está vendido y cada dueño está avanzando en su parcela. 
Los números de las parcelas están correctos y los límites de cada parcela se encuentran todos bien demarcados en terreno. Alrededor de un 60% los dueños han cercado sus terrenos (con cercos de alambre ó tranqueras, no existen muros sólidos).
Para las parcelas que no tengan construido su cerco aún, debo cambiar la etiqueta de la línea? ya que las he marcado todas como "cerca"
Es importante para nosotros la correcta ubicación de cada terreno ya que cada vez hay más gente llegando a vivir y no contamos con servicios de delivery (materiales de construcción, gas, etc) por no aparecer en el mapa.

Estoy atento a tus indicaciones para realizar las correcciones correspondientes.
Gracias, Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185883497
felipeeugenio (2026-07-19 15:19:10+00:00): Hola. Muchas gracias por responder y por la actitud.
Está bien así. Es un proyecto que existe y es verificable en terreno. Está bien agregar las direcciones como nodos.
Solo, por favor no agregar rejas y demarcaciones que no existen todavía.

Saludos
cubbe8 (2026-07-17 05:10:57+00:00): Additionally, roads that don’t show up on the state GIS map should be mapped as highway=service and names should be pulled from there as well. 

https://www.rigis.org/datasets/e-911-road-centerlines

https://planning.ri.gov/planning-areas/transportation/highway-functional-classification

https://gis.data.mass.gov/datasets/massgis::massgis-massdot-roads/explore?location=41.967385%2C-71.416132%2C8
osmviborg (2026-07-17 05:59:48+00:00): village?
b-holdet (2026-07-17 07:09:29+00:00): Vil hamlet være bedre? 
Jeg har det lidt svært med sætte gradueringen mellem "city" -> "town" -> "village" -> "hamlet" -> "isolated_dwelling"

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:place#Populated_settlements,_urban_and_rural
osmviborg (2026-07-17 07:18:27+00:00): hamlet https://lgms.nl/p/osm/cached-wiki/?page=Tag:place%3Dhamlet
osmviborg (2026-07-17 07:20:36+00:00): Der er 19 adresse- punket i landsbyen.
b-holdet (2026-07-17 07:22:37+00:00): 👍 Tak
bxl-forever (2026-07-22 19:45:39+00:00): ## DATA CORRUPTION WARNING ##

Hello, Kalle888,

This message is to inform you that it seems that you are inadvertently pushing dozens of personal notes onto the public OSM database.

You seem to have renamed objects on your personal copy of CoMaps. This should be fine… but now all this data is being uploaded. We are seeing large changes about camping sites in various countries.

For instance, a camping site near Québec (Canada), for which the public name displayed to *everyone* on the map has become "Camping Transit: Sehr beliebt bei Reisenden, da er direkt an der A-20 liegt. Er bietet einen kostenlosen Shuttle-Service zur Fähre, die Sie direkt in die Altstadt von Québec bringt."

Please disconnect your app immediately, those personal changes should never have been uploaded in the first place.

Thanks.
bxl-forever (2026-07-22 19:46:58+00:00): This changeset also brings unwanted duplicates.

This café https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14021645801 is a duplicate of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14008135357 with the same name and in the same building.
cuzi (2026-07-23 09:09:46+00:00): Taya_S has blocked them and reverted the changes https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186215963
AndersAndersson (2026-07-17 21:32:20+00:00): Innehåller detta även mindre privata vägar eller bara större statliga vägar?
Jag är bara nyfiken.
NKA (2026-07-18 07:42:46+00:00): For det meste på riksveier og fylkesveier, og bare i Norge.
AndersAndersson (2026-07-18 12:32:16+00:00): Att det bara är Norge förstår jag. Tänkte mer på om det innehåller även mindre och kanske privata vägar, typ Blåhøe eller Tindevegen.
Flynn Marquardt (2026-07-17 09:53:22+00:00): This changeset breaks 5 borders and makes them unusable without offering new borders. The changeset should be reverted.
Sébastien Pi (2026-07-20 14:17:02+00:00): Salut,

Ce segment ne mène à rien : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1539953694 c’est normal ?
Pas eu l’occasion de jeter un œil depuis quelques semaines là-bas.
BardafFr (2026-07-20 14:21:08+00:00): C'est un trottoirs/piste cyclable qui aboutie dans de l'herbe. J'attends de voir si au final, lorsque l'enrobé sera mis (normalement aujourd'hui) la partie cyclable a un abaissé pour retourné sur la route.
BardafFr (2026-07-20 14:22:12+00:00): D'ailleurs, faudra surement modifier également l'ancienne piste cyclable de la rue de lostes pour la terminer sur ce trottoir
Sébastien Pi (2026-07-20 14:23:04+00:00): Tu as aussi créé d’autres Osmose en ne mettant pas segregated ici 
https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/issue/7926dfbd-e363-f728-c50f-961107854136
:)

J’essaie de faire d’Haubourdin une ville propre https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/map/#loc=14/50.60653/2.99112&item=1xxx%2C2xxx%2C3xxx%2C4xxx%2C5xxx%2C6xxx%2C7xxx%2C9xxx&level=1%2C2%2C3
XD
BardafFr (2026-07-20 14:27:27+00:00): Si tu veux des photos pour voir plus de détails, je peut te le envoyer. Je les ai pas mis sur panoramax car pas de super point de vu
Sébastien Pi (2026-07-20 14:33:00+00:00): T’embête pas, je te laisse finir. À voir si la petite zone de travaux que j’avais créée peut être supprimée aussi.
BardafFr (2026-07-20 14:35:33+00:00): Je vais essayé d'y repasser demain.

Pour le moment elle ne peut pas être retiré, la rue de la carrière des ciments est même fermé depuis la semaine dernière (elle doit réouvrir aujourd'hui ou demain)
FajrAl (2026-07-18 15:42:27+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1539957740 kalau ingin membuat rute, lebih baik gunakan Wikiloc atau Komoot
FajrAl (2026-07-18 15:45:04+00:00): perubahan telah dipulihkan https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185964607
Zrop (2026-07-19 20:37:47+00:00): Hallo krza,
was war hier an der Parkplatzfläche falsch ?

Gruß
Zrop
krza (2026-07-26 13:36:36+00:00): An der Stelle kann man sein Auto abstellen, auch zwei. Aber wenn man das nicht weiß, deutet nicht viel darauf hin, dass es eine Fläche zum Parken ist. Das ist einfach nur ein freies Stück Gras am Haus.

Ich bin nicht sicher, ob da ein Schild mit Parken-Bezug an der Wand hin oder nur der Hinweis auf die Bildhauerei. Jedenfalls empfinde ich den Punkt als angemessener als die Fläche. Ganz gemäß dem Grundsatz: Wir taggen nicht für den Renderer, sondern bilden die Realität ab. Die von Dir wieder eingezeichnete Fläche suggeriert etwas, das schlicht nicht existiert. Ein Punkt hingegen meint einfach nur, dass man da parken kann, ohne aber Aussagen darüber zu treffen, wie dieser Parkplatz aussieht. In meinen Augen eigentlich eine ziemlich klare Sache.
krza (2026-07-26 13:38:11+00:00): PS: Die Tags "orientation" und "parking" machen in dem Zusammenhang übrigens auch keinen Sinn (bzw. sind sogar falsch), da der Bezugspunkt (die Straße) fehlt.
confusedbuffalo (2026-07-17 07:24:41+00:00): Actually DH3
seichter (2026-07-17 18:38:45+00:00): Danke.
Knapp daneben ist auch vorbei.
habi (2026-07-19 08:54:43+00:00): Ciao!
Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap!
Schön machst du hier mit und hilfst, die Karte und die Kartendaten zu pflegen.
Das Gebäude https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/171956236 ist in OpenStreetMap als Wohngebäude erfasst, wenn du dem "nur" den Namen WIBSS Informatik gibst, ist das nicht ideal.
Idealer wäre es, euer Büro als eigenständigen Punkt *im* Gebäude zu erfassen, z.B. als `office=company` und noch ein paar andere Details wie Webseite und so hinzufügen würdest.
Willst du das noch machen?
Gruss aus Bern,
habi
Vmosnokia31 (2026-07-17 07:38:20+00:00): Changeset: [https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185522232](185522232)
Vmosnokia31 (2026-07-17 07:38:45+00:00): *185522232
4004 (2026-07-19 23:50:59+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29163341/history#map=18/53.678177/23.771376&layers=N https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=163395482301231&focus=photo там больше нет колеи? вроде трек был нормальный
Victor Kareno (2026-07-20 06:10:44+00:00): от въезда на очистные я колеи не увидел. возможно, там участок зарос травой. мне не принципиально, можно и вернуть
4004 (2026-07-20 23:09:39+00:00): Можно вернуть но поставить грейд похуже и smoothness
tyr_asd (2026-07-17 08:41:43+00:00): additional source: http://www.pfarrei-stmichael.it/de/kirchen/kirchen-2.html
jayaddison (2026-07-22 09:16:26+00:00): Thanks!
grzegorz75jan (2026-07-28 22:47:06+00:00): Takie zmiany należy wcześniej poddać dyskusji na forum.
Kamil Kalata (2026-07-29 09:57:28+00:00): Poddałem tę zmianę dyskusji post factum (https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/kategorie-drog/57996/646). W skrócie: zaproponowałem pozostawienie zmiany i niewycofywanie zestawu, dopóki nie pojawi się głos sprzeciwu.
eteb3 (2026-07-17 09:35:55+00:00): Source = survey and aerial imagery
TheSwavu (2026-07-19 00:43:25+00:00): Hi,

Just to let you know roundabouts such as w1539983693 require a junction=roundabout tag.

I have fixed this one.

Thanks.
Alan Thomas (2026-07-19 02:08:17+00:00): Thanks for letting me know. I'll keep that in mind.
Dodko (2026-07-21 10:17:16+00:00): Do názvu sa nepíše opis objektu ale len skutočný názov ak je objekt pomenovaný.
Batistacavera (2026-07-17 13:29:42+00:00): I denna ändring har wheelchairtaggen tagits bort från highway=bus_stop.
archie (2026-07-17 13:36:16+00:00): Taggat som public_transport=stop_position. Se min tidigare kommentar. Wheelchair, bench, bin etc finns på transport=platform.
Batistacavera (2026-07-17 13:50:37+00:00): Jaha då förstår jag. Har missförstått taggningschemat lite. Blir nog inte så överblickbart för mig som redigerar på mobiltelefon. Har testat iD någon enstaka gång men det var inte för mig. JOSM förstod jag inte alls. För komplext.
archie (2026-07-17 13:55:50+00:00): ... är det inte på tiden att du gör ett nytt försök med antingen iD eller JOSM? Din produktivitet skulle öka enormt!
Och så skulle du kunna åtgärda de geometrifel som du fört in i  osm (https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=12.04465&lat=57.72146&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways).
Batistacavera (2026-07-17 14:45:46+00:00): Ska titta på det igen. Har lärt mig lite mer än sist. Hade varit bra att kunna lägga in vägar och ytor.
archie (2026-07-17 14:54:41+00:00): Det hade varit bra om du gjorde det. Säg till om du behöver assistens.
Batistacavera (2026-07-17 16:34:41+00:00): Jag hojtar till isf.
AndersAndersson (2026-07-17 21:30:27+00:00): De individuella sträckorna i Sollerön var redan satta som inner i Siljans multipolygon.
Vad var det du ville åstadkomma som var fel tidigare?
Nu är multipolygonen för Sollerön satt som outer i Siljan. Det behöver ändras, samt att de individuella sträckorna eller Sollerörelationen ska vara inner, inte både och.
Batistacavera (2026-07-17 11:57:32+00:00): I wikin (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=bus%20stop) rekommenderas taggen shelter och bench står som optional. På mötesplatserna för Föexlinjen tog du bort dessa. Bör de inte vara kvar? De var taggade enligt vad som observerats på plats.
archie (2026-07-17 12:04:00+00:00): Hej, tack! De bör definitivt vara kvar. Meningen var att shelter och bench etc kom bort från public_transport=stop_position.
Jag lägger tillbaka uppgifterna på mötesplatserna (som alltså inte är taggade enl PT v2).
Batistacavera (2026-07-17 12:17:15+00:00): Ok då är jag med!
Batistacavera (2026-07-17 13:28:38+00:00): I denna ändring har wheelchairtaggen tagits bort från highway=bus_stop.
Batistacavera (2026-07-17 13:51:50+00:00): Ej aktuellt då det rör sig om stop_position
IndiaKW2Gf7rTBt5C (2026-07-17 17:38:09+00:00): Too many overnoded building with incorrect geometry, positions or angles, is useless even misleading
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185895660
Flynn_ (2026-07-17 11:15:31+00:00): Dydh da ha dynnargh dhe OpenStreetMap Kernow!

Assuming that the "Cornwall Council definitive map" is the one linked below, it isn't a permitted source for OSM. Its data is from Ordnance Survey which is under Crown Copyright, whereas OSM is under the incompatible ODbL license.

https://experience.arcgis.com/experience/a3074c31108a43ada55e21e660bc043d/page/Page

For a change this minor it's not a massive problem but just something to be aware of in future. Other maps such as Google Maps are also not legal sources. OSM does have explicit permission to use the satellite imagery included in editors like iD (the one on the website). If you're ever unsure about whether we're allowed to use something, you can make a new topic on the forum and ask: https://community.openstreetmap.org/

Oll an gwella :)
Flynn
Equalizer379 (2026-07-17 10:05:14+00:00): A Solar *Farm*, Sorry.
TrickyFoxy (2026-07-17 23:38:58+00:00): Уже отмечена же
map per (2026-07-19 09:14:01+00:00): Hello map-maker-pro,

The Theresienwiese is not a pedestrian zone, it's just ordinary paths.

Best regards
map per
Bobrossrosstoss (2026-07-17 10:14:46+00:00): Was input as axon camera, corrected to appropriate camera type, aka a flock camera
eggie (2026-07-17 14:41:29+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-07-17 14:48:06+00:00): Feedback Wanneer er een G12a bromfietspad aan de oostzijde loopt lijkt het me inconsistent om moped=yes te gaan taggen.
Wat is de status van dat fietspad en zijn dan ergens bromfietsdoorsteken.

MVG
eggie
user_5359 (2026-07-18 14:14:07+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14021968699. What is the mean of the tag 47 = 23?
rarad74 (2026-07-17 19:57:02+00:00): Salut. Nu mai reface terog intersectiile dupa imaginile ESRI deoarece nu sunt bine centrate ( desi sunt cele mai recente) simuti elemente ale intersectiei intr-o pozitie gresita.  Mapbox sunt cel mai bine centrate pe Bucuresti in lipsa trackurilor gpx.
eggie (2026-07-17 15:02:09+00:00): Floor.. moped=designated hoort niet op een G11 fietspad. Welke status heeft dit fietspad..
Fietspadtagging
Presets: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=31077
G11: mofa=yes, moped=no, traffic_sign=NL:G11
G12a: moped=designated, mofa=designated, traffic_sign=NL:G12a
G13: moped=no, mofa=no, traffic_sign=NL:G13

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Cycleway

Kijk je nog even?

MVG
eggie
Tatfahren (2026-07-17 11:00:58+00:00): Hallo RobertZett,
Leider erklärt dein changesetkommentar nicht was du gemacht hast, und durch die Größe kann man das auch nicht so einfach überblicken, wie man es bei "minor additions" erwarten könnte.

Eigentlich sollen in dem Feld die Änderungen zusammengefasst werden. Wenn das aufgrund der Vielzahl der Änderung, die nicht zusammengehören, nicht möglich ist, sollte die Änderung stattdessen in mehrere, kleinere changesets aufgeteilt werden.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
RobertZett (2026-07-18 21:41:16+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis.

Ich habe die Fahrradwege entlang der Radeburger Straße korrigiert.
Auch habe ich fehlende POIs an der Tankstelle hinzugefügt.
Batistacavera (2026-07-17 12:05:53+00:00): Bör inte tiölgänglighetstaggen wheelchair kvarstå? Den förekommer på drygt 3 % av public_transport=stop_position och är ett av objekten wheelmap riktar in sig på. Den är antagligen användbar för personer i rullstol.
archie (2026-07-17 13:14:36+00:00): Nej, public_transport=stop_position är inget som finns till i verkligheten. Det indikerar endast ett ungefärligt ställe där fordonet stannar till. Det är till för routning-ändamål. Det är en virtuell node. Det är en skillnad mot vad fallet är med highway=bus_stop enl PT v1.
Batistacavera (2026-07-17 13:24:25+00:00): Ok då är jag med. Men då finns istället problem med fler highway=bus_stop i nyss gjorda ändringsset.
eggie (2026-07-17 14:37:48+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Batistacavera (2026-07-17 13:26:30+00:00): I denna ändring har tillgänglighetsanpassningar (taktil beläggning) och vindskydd yagits bort från highway=bus_stop.
Batistacavera (2026-07-17 14:39:05+00:00): Ej aktuellt då det rör sig om stop_position
user_5359 (2026-07-20 17:58:11+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14022090068 (one of forty four objects). What is the mean of the key 
description:kerentanan ?