piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
zvenzzon (2023-09-16 16:36:02+00:00): Jag har nu undersökt saken på plats och kan fastställa följande. Parkeringen är uppdelad i två delar: Ena delen: "Förskolan Hellbergs väg" och andra delen av parkeringen heter "Herrhagsgården". Parkeringarna har jag fixat i openstreetmap.

Vad gäller själva byggnaden så pratade jag med en som jobbade där och frågade vad anläggningen hette. Den kallades Herrhagsgården. På en skylt in till parkeringen  står det "omsorgsboende". Ska vi ändra tillbaka som det var baserat på detta? Fortfarande finns det ingen skyld på byggnaden som bekräftar namnet, och Falun Kommuns hemsida säger att Herrhagsgården ligger i Herrhagen. Dock tror jag det är tillfälligt flyttat pga renovering. Men ändå. Vad tycker du vi ska göra?
AndersAndersson (2023-09-16 22:34:57+00:00): Bra gjort att gräva ordentligt! (mycket mer än jag gjorde).
Jag körde en drive och stängde lite anteckningar. Men jag nöjde mig med att kolla på kommunens hemsida var Herrhagsgården låg.
Är det tillfälligt flyttat så kan väl "on the ground" gälla och detta får ha taggar för Herrhagsgården tills det flyttas tillbaka igen?
Ber om ursäkt för att du får lov att lägga in det igen.
𒂼𒄄　 (2023-09-10 02:58:21+00:00): Please don't add duplicate places in non local languages.. I will revert this changeset.
Taya_S (2023-09-09 14:59:45+00:00): Hey publicerination, 

thanks for adding all these shops, and I hope you're enjoying your time in the Netherlands. 

I just wanted to mention that in the Netherlands all address are already imported. See for example the node for this address: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2808050043

Would you mind adding the shop info to those nodes instead of creating new nodes and duplicating the addresses?

Sincerely,
Taya
spughetti (2023-09-09 17:12:49+00:00): Hi Taya,

Is this also applicable for buildings that contain both an apartment an a business? I don't know for sure but I believe the ground floor of this shop is used as a business and the other floors are a home.
Taya_S (2023-09-09 17:46:26+00:00): Yes, thats also applicable in those cases. If there is a seperate home it would also have a seperate address. Typically its either just a different number, or the it ends with a letter like 4a
spughetti (2023-09-09 21:00:54+00:00): Gotchu, thanks for pointing it out :)

I fixed my mistake, you can find my changeset [here](https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141039968).
DrSpiros (2023-09-08 21:32:40+00:00): actually fixed coordinataes in wikidata item and lined wd item to node.Didn't move node in osm.
ovruni (2023-09-09 23:27:01+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Vandalismo
Xvtn (2023-12-14 15:55:16+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Since you requested a review, I went over your changes. Looks great to me, no problems. Thanks for your contributions!
gscholz (2023-09-10 06:48:44+00:00): Hi max0479,
this changeset has created errors in the OSm database regarding duplicate nodes:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=4.46785&lat=50.47286&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=141003699

Especially way 112878060 is affected here:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/112878060

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
max0479 (2023-09-10 09:11:35+00:00): Dear Guido. This is fixed. Sorry for the disturbance. I tried to edit on iPad but it was a bad idea obviously. Best, Maxime
gscholz (2023-09-10 09:27:05+00:00): Hi Maxime,
thanks for your quick response.
Guido
gscholz (2023-09-10 07:14:07+00:00): Hi Superadlen,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=7.95247&lat=36.27050&zoom=18&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=141003778

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Superadlen (2023-09-13 13:31:35+00:00): Thank you. Yes, I know about this. There are my friends in our group for creating the map. They are the ones who will take care of this. I am sending large information that I cannot correct at the time
dcskobuffs (2023-09-11 20:41:51+00:00): Correction: Source used was Maxar SecureWatch Imagery 2023-06-13.
vojtechzaboril (2023-10-18 13:05:37+00:00): Neupravujte prosím ele=* podle údajů z wikipedie (z wikipedie obecně nepřebírejte vůbec nic, pouze odkazy na wiki). Mnohdy jsou ty původní přesnější
eerib (2023-09-12 02:32:09+00:00): Hello Black Tusk,

I saw some disagreement with the roundabout in this area. I've since done a survey of the area using semi-professional equipment and verified my work with government lidar and aggregate GPS data. This roundabout, and many other features in Snug Cove, should now be accurate to within about 1 ft.

It may look like the roundabout, and other features, are incorrect when comparing with Bing Maps Aerial and the OpenStreetMap traces but both of those sources have significant issues and shouldn't be used without further on-site verification.

Cheers & happy mapping, eerib

P.S. if you have an Android device you may be interested in the StreetComplete OSM mapping app.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-10 01:10:45+00:00): DWG revert:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141044395
emersonveenstra (2023-09-09 15:18:04+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for the edits! When tagging lanes, the count needs to be the total number, not the number on one side.

Also, please make sure you look along the entire section of road, for example, the intersection with South Saginaw has three lanes, not two
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-10 01:10:46+00:00): DWG revert:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141044395
impiaaa (2023-09-09 17:45:54+00:00): Welcome to OSM! The building=* key is meant for what the building was built as; if it was built as a house but re-used as an office, it should be "building=house". See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Buildings . In these cases it might also be better to map the business as a separate node. Also, "building=detached" is for houses that are not connected to other houses. Sheds should use "building=shed". See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building=detached
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-22 14:56:36+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1146934445/history - są podstawy by sądzić że to realne plany?
Anas masuris (2025-05-22 15:24:34+00:00): To proszę się pytać użytkownika SzybkieDrogi, który tę drogę naniósł. 

Jedyne, co mogę powiedzieć, to to, że rondo w Kałęczynie jest przygotowane do konstrukcji drogi w stronę Odrano-Woli. Tylko tyle
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-22 15:33:25+00:00): pytałem sie wszystkich którzy to edytowali - wolę się zapytać za dużo niż za mało
Felipe Alves (2023-09-13 17:49:42+00:00): Oi, Evelize. Tudo bem?
Percebi que tem feito algumas edições colocando notas ou descrições dos locais na etiqueta "nome", mas como ver na página da Wiki que fala sobre esta etiqueta, esta prática não é correta.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Names

Também não é correto representar o mesmo elemento (como o auditório, ou a área de conveniência) com um ponto E uma área. Caso tenha os 2, melhor deixar apenas a área.

Fico a disposição para quaisquer dúvidas.

Abs,
Felipe
Evelize95 (2023-09-13 22:13:45+00:00): Olá Felipe, obrigada pela sua resposta. Vou conversar com o aluno que está responsável pelas edições para que ele possa fazer as mudanças sugeridas.
marczoutendijk (2023-11-13 14:21:12+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1206286187
bridge=1?
What is the meaning of that?
dieterdreist (2023-11-13 14:40:02+00:00): interestingly the tag has some historic usage http://taghistory.raifer.tech/#***/bridge/1
but here it is a typo for yes, sorry
NorthCrab_upload (2023-09-09 00:10:17+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1206287349
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1206287580

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
mapuit (2024-04-27 08:35:06+00:00): Leider war das entfernen gar nicht gemäß den OSM. Längst abgerissene Bahnstrecken werden als https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:railway%3Drazed kartiert. Das hat leider fälschlicherweise ein inzwischen gelöschter User schon auf https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:railway=abandoned geändert gehabt, bis du es ganz gelöscht hast. Nun fehlt in der OpenRailwayMap die Nebenstrecke Bayreuth - Hollfeld (https://openrailwaymap.org).
Kannst du deine Änderung bitte rückgängig machen bzw. zu "razed" korrigieren?
Bobbi123 (2024-04-28 12:58:31+00:00): Die gelöschten Streckenbestandteile haben die OSM-Vorgabe für razed nicht erfüllt, was in den letzten Monaten mehr als ausführlich in der Community diskutiert wurde und es gab hier eine klar Empfehlung der DWG, die deine Ansicht nicht teilt.

Ich werde hierzu keine Grundsatzdiskussion mehr führen, denn irgendwann muss endlich mal gut sein.
OStreetMapper (2023-09-09 00:11:35+00:00): Sorry, this was supposed to be “Mapped Meramec Heights Center.”
gscholz (2023-09-10 06:35:42+00:00): Hi JAAS,
this changeset has creates errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting line:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-90.59026&lat=14.47740&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=141006274

Especially way 640380551 is affected here:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/640380551

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
JAAS (2023-09-11 02:39:48+00:00): Hello Guido,

Thank you for catching this mistake. I am currently unable to edit now, but will fix it tomorrow on my computer.

Best regards,
Jorge
MxxCon (2023-09-09 07:55:52+00:00): Hello.
Please note that the facebook contact info is already in contact:facebook= tag.
It's not correct to add duplicate data.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141006334
Famlam (2023-09-30 22:39:07+00:00): Ook voor deze weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1206291390 geldt dat bicycle_road niet van toepassing is. Mogelijk bedoelde je bicycle=yes, maar op een fietspad is fietstoegang de standaard en hoeft dus niet getagd te worden.
ovruni (2023-09-09 01:49:51+00:00): Hola, la etiqueta de lotes se encuentra destinada únicamente para edificios [0], no para lotes. Un lote puede tener mas de un edificio y áreas no construidas que no son edificios .
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:building
Koreller (2023-09-10 13:59:13+00:00): Hello theman7777, thank you for demolishing my work, but you haven't put it on OHM, why? Could you do it? Have a nice day :)!
Kai Johnson (2023-11-15 16:22:39+00:00): There should be just one element with the name=* tag and the primary tags (e.g., place=*). In this case way/22392046 already has the name=* and place=* tags, so the name should not be added to way/138261260. / Il ne doit y avoir qu'un seul élément avec la balise name=* et les balises principales (par exemple, place=*). Dans ce cas, way/22392046 a déjà les balises name=* et place=*, le nom ne doit donc pas être ajouté à way/138261260.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141007495
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-02 15:13:19+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2614471770/history has access:vehicle that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
Would using vehicle access tag (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:vehicle ) be fitting at least equally well?
ngry_pazuzu (2025-04-14 04:26:14+00:00): Unfortunately the user "henreemash" has put back the roundabouts in his changeset number 164860378.
Tayvick (2023-09-12 20:15:06+00:00): Correction: Power poles
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141007797
lovingkindness (2023-09-09 02:59:41+00:00): Please let us know if there is a way for us to find out who and when this farm was named as "Sprouts and Spores Organic Farm". Is there a way to check the history of edit on openstreetmap in this particular land? Please let us know. Thanks!
GOwin (2023-09-12 01:25:38+00:00): Hi there. Thank you raising this topic.

Yes, the easist way to determine the history of OpenStreetMap (OSM) elements is the Query Feature button (it's the last button on the right panel of the screen, featuring an arrow pointing to the left, with a question mark.

In this case, the land feature was named 8 days ago.

OSM never claims to be authoritative, or official. Ergo, caveat emptor. With or without OSM, it's not hard to create fantasy maps.
GOwin (2023-09-12 01:30:44+00:00): For your convenience you can view the history here, too: https://osm.mapki.com/history/way/162052559

The last geometry edit was made 8 days ago (not a rename, as I posted earlier), and the prior name change was made in 2019.
ElliottPlack (2023-10-10 02:06:02+00:00): Agreed the golf mappers butchered Caves Valley. Please clean it up further if you have time.
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2023-09-09 04:25:59+00:00): 因为每一个changeset里面都留言一遍所有想说的话的话，也实在太麻烦而太打扰了，但是如果不留下标记就很难知道已经被回退，所以就只去留下这个变更集的链接即可。
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2023-09-09 04:28:11+00:00): 按照 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Limitations_on_mapping_private_information 中的标准：

Mapping private buildings, private roads (including driveways), private parking is considered as completely acceptable. Add access=private as appropriate to roads, parkings etc.

也就是说，画农田里的公共道路，并非仅仅属于某个具体的农户家里的道路，是完全符合规则的。而且它也可以被不特定的某几个人通行（虽然不少村子不准外人进村，可以access=destination）
即使真的是和西方国家一样路权属于私有，禁止其他人通行（记得日本有一条上山路是这样），也可以access=private来解决。更何况中国的农场土地理论上是国有的。
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2023-09-09 06:15:35+00:00): 涉及到的changeset有：

140483118 140483041 140482892 140482470 140482141
user_8655426 (2023-09-09 07:54:59+00:00): Arigatou gozaimasu!
(= Thank you so much!)
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-31 16:09:54+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11178079806/history has fixme:type = office that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What kind of office is here?

If unclear, maybe office=yes would fit? Already more clear than hopeless amenity=fixme

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:office
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 06:34:56+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141368140
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 06:34:50+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141368133
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-13 05:16:12+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141189648
eggie (2023-09-16 09:56:44+00:00): Dag Stroet,

Waarom amenity=college ?

Mavo Havo wordt in de regel aangeduid met school..
ROC en AOC (MBO opleidingen met college)  en HBO en Universiteit met university.
MVG
eggie
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 06:31:43+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141368031
user_11609320 (2023-09-09 05:22:28+00:00): if there is duplicate addresses. let me know the editor was changing the addresses for some reason
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 06:31:37+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141368026
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 06:31:31+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141368021
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 06:31:25+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141368017
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 06:31:19+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141368015
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 06:31:12+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141368011
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 06:31:05+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141368008
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 06:29:37+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141367945
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 06:29:29+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141367941
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 06:29:23+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141367934
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 06:29:16+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141367925
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 06:25:59+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141367797
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 06:25:53+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141367792
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 06:16:42+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141367458
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 06:14:07+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141367374
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 06:14:04+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141367372
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 06:13:57+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141367363
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 06:13:50+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141367362
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 06:13:43+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141367359
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 06:12:53+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141367315
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 06:12:48+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141367313
Kovoschiz (2023-09-11 05:09:47+00:00): Your other edits https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141012355 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141012355  hasn't been adding them to it.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 06:12:45+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141367311
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 06:12:39+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141367309
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 06:12:34+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141367308
geozeisig (2023-09-13 05:16:06+00:00): I can read it only in English.
Supaplex (2023-09-13 06:11:36+00:00): It is just spam. You can ignore it.
SomeoneElse (2023-09-16 09:40:30+00:00): I've hidden the spam link.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 06:12:28+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141367301
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 06:05:43+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141367055
NorthCrab_upload (2023-09-09 07:30:21+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184990336
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184996477
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184996989
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184991226
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184992231
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184989408
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184990046
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184992733
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184993230
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184997326
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184991946
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184990535
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184989895
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184989505
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184990772
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184991411
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184993332
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184993067
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184995370
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184990889
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184992550
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184996130
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184991508
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184994706
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184995466
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184992903
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184991108
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100137473
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100137474
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100137477
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100137478
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100137479
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100137480
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100137481
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100137483
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100820386
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100820387
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100820389
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100820396
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100820399
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100820402
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100137468
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100137443
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100137444
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100137445
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100137448
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100137451
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100137452
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100137455
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100137456
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100137458
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100137460
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100137463
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100137467

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 06:05:37+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141367054
george1201 (2023-10-09 21:45:00+00:00): Ich habe eine Anmerkung zu https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4109525427. Da ist der Name "Excipio" eingetragen. Ich habe Fotos von den Firmenschildern am Eingang gemacht, da finde ich "Tecxipio", aber kein "Excipio". Sind das zwei verschiedene Firmen? Hast du den Namen "Excipio" dort gelesen? Vielleicht nur auf einem Klingelschild?
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 06:05:34+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141367052
Apirnus (2023-09-18 12:21:01+00:00): Building with address Vilde tee 66a next to Lehola bus stop on Vilde tee, does not exist anymore.
Apirnus (2023-09-19 14:36:17+00:00): Building with address Sõpruse pst 212a at Lepistiku bus stop does not exist anymore.
Kubiskon2 (2023-09-09 10:38:26+00:00): Księża Wólka 47 znajduje się w tym miejscu
https://www.google.com/maps/@51.8553204,18.7480464,19.5z?hl=pl-PL&entry=ttu
Dimitar155 (2023-09-10 16:00:47+00:00): Привет Боби,

Наистина ли при пешеходната пътека (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11092982054) има светофари или си цъкнал грешната опция без да искаш? 

Поздрави,
Митко
Boyan Alexiev (2023-09-13 08:10:11+00:00): Здравей Митко,
Благодаря за забележката. Правиното е че е немаркирана пешеходна пътека. Няма светофар, но изглежда съм цъкнал на грешния бутон на StreetComplete и съм добавил такъв. Върнах на предишната стойност.

Поздрави, Боби
Apirnus (2023-09-19 13:45:22+00:00): Building with address Sõpruse pst 167b at Siili bus stop does not exist anymore.
DaveF (2024-01-03 23:51:13+00:00): Hi
The building has disappeared. Please reinstate.
BCNorwich (2024-01-04 08:26:13+00:00): Hi, 

Strange, opened in JOSM and the pub is there as expected, it's this relation:- https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16306400.  

The situation before I did anything was that the pub outline was drawn twice (duplication). Once as the outside outline and once as the outside outline with extension (self-intersecting) to include a cut-out for a courtyard. What I did was to remove all of the self-intersecting line except the courtyard, tagging that as a courtyard. Then make a multipolygon relation from the remaining tagged pub outline and the courtyard.

A bit of thought later. The kept outline in the relation is tagged as amenity=pub, this renders OK in JOSM. The removed outline was tagged building=pub, which renders OK in JOSM.  I had thought, from the tag amenity=pub, a building was implied, as the wiki:-  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dpub#How_to_map  implies.

Anyway I've added the tag building=retail to the relation, see if that resolves the problem.

Regards Bernard.
eggie (2023-09-09 09:49:08+00:00): Dag k..
Wellicht leisure=sports_centre erbij.. dan zal de naam.ook renderen.
Mvg
eggie