piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SekeRob (2024-10-15 10:16:08+00:00): Comment to self: This is a rouge CS created during a crashed JOSM sessions while uploading a 1300 node CS set. Lesson to take away from: When JOSM upload/session crashes or comp has power faiil during upload and restarting JODM to recover the data not yet uploaded, check if a partial CS was entered into OSM. Two possible solutions. 1) Backout/revert the CS resulting from the crashed/partial CS upload and then retry to original upload. 2). Run a JOSM Update Data or Update Modified to fetch any node IDs that may have been created during the failed upload. If you dont you could likely end up with orphaned nodes, in this case exactly 1000. Saves lots of time the next day not having to delete these duplicate nodes from the system.
Marek-M (2024-10-15 09:10:20+00:00): Cześć, możesz podać źródło tej zmiany? Dodany adres przez Ciebie wygląda nieprawidłowo.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157891666
łapa ciemności (2024-10-15 13:36:11+00:00): Dodatkowo opis zmian jest naprawdę nic nie wnoszący
silversurfer83 (2024-10-15 18:58:30+00:00): Hallo Matze :)

eine Frage: Nach welchen Kriterien hast du die Eigenschaften bei "Erlaubter Zugang" gesetzt?

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157891754
happymatze (2024-10-15 19:03:53+00:00): Hallo Silversurfer83.
Es handelt sich um einen Privatweg der Stiftungsforsten, in dem motorisierte Fahrzeuge nicht erlaubt sind. Deshalb habe ich mich durch die verschiedenen Optionen geklickt.
Gruß, Matze
silversurfer83 (2024-10-15 19:22:20+00:00): Danke für die schnelle Rückmeldung :)

Diese Werte (access ist da der Oberbegriff) werden nach rechtlichen Grundlagen gesetzt. Wenn dies also ein klassischer "Privatweg" im Wald ist, so wie er auch häufig in den Flächen von Hessen Forts zu finden ist, dann sollte es ausreichen, wenn die Wege mit "motor_vehicle=forestry" getaggt werden. Alles andere ist nach Hessischem Waldgesetz zu handhaben, und auf Waldwegen ist Radeln und Wandern per default erlaubt. Daher ist es nicht nötig für alle Vorschläge, die der Editor dir unterbreitet einen Wert zu setzen.

Zu den Details was access angeht, kannst du dich im Wiki unter
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access
umsehen

Bei Fragen immer raus damit
silversurfer83
gpserror (2024-10-14 21:17:40+00:00): This doesn't do anything with restrictions.  I'd either revert as there's no need for this, else you would have to break up the road to dual carriageway (and remove the turn restrictions as they would be implicit with the split.)

Fixes needed.
zorglubu (2024-10-16 12:29:06+00:00): Bonjour,

un access=private est tout à fait adapté à la situation, en remplacement des bicycle=no, horse=no, motor_vehicle=no

Le oneway=no est également inutile car toujours sous-entendu. Cet attribut est utile "essentiellement pour les autres contributeurs" par exemple lorsqu'une voie à sens unique devient à double sens, et que quelqu'un pourrait penser à un oubli.

Cordialement.
Patryk2710 (2024-10-29 20:17:14+00:00): Witaj, budynki oznaczamy jako building=yes
Frans S (2024-10-15 10:33:34+00:00): You clustered here many buildings as well.
Each (cubical) building need to be mapped separately.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157892155
Fizzie-DWG (2025-01-29 05:03:04+00:00): Advertising reverted by DWG

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161882304
NorthCrab_upload (2024-10-14 19:21:15+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.

"Aleja Konstytucji 3 Maja":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4841295836

"Jana Pawła II":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12251135298

"Zamenhofa":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12251135300

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2024-10-14 19:21:16+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4841295836
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12251135297
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12251135298
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12251135299
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12251143301
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12251143302
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12251143303
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12251143304

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
KORraN (2024-10-14 20:49:33+00:00): Naprawione w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157895847

Dzięki za czujnego bota :)
dval (2024-10-16 14:05:49+00:00): Hi, agent-98! Хорошо, что вы рисуете, но ошибок совершаете достаточно много. Вот вроде вы написали "тест JOSM", при этом оставили недоработки, на которые валидатор редактора вам указал. Постарайтесь хорошо разобраться с мультиполигонами. Например, на здании Пионерская, 14а и прилегающим газонам есть что улучшить, то есть привести в норму. Вам в OsmCha некто понаставил аж пять плюсов, но это он зря, пока еще рано.
Violaine_Do (2024-11-26 20:43:48+00:00): Bonjour JFK. Il semblerait que tu sois en train d'importer les données du Pays. Je pense que tu es au courant qu'une telle opération impose une démarche spécifique auprès de la communauté OSM, notamment la communauté locale. A l'époque le choix avait été fait de ne pas importer cette donnée du fait de sa qualité relative... Pourrais tu au moins préciser comment tu sélectionnes les données que tu choisis d'intégrer? Bien à toi, Violaine
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157892824
JFK73 (2024-11-27 17:41:02+00:00): Bonjour Violaine

En effet un import massif et systématique nécessiterait une plus ample concertation.
Ca n'est nullement mon intention. Ici les données concernent uniquement l'hydrographie et quelques éléments topographiques. Et surtout elles ont été longuement retravaillées et affinées avant de les intégrer dans OSM. Chaque ruisseau a subi a minima une modification car les données bien que très précises et alignées, contenaient de nombreuses erreurs de continuité, de mauvais sens d'écoulement, absence de pont/ gué... impossible à corriger automatiquement. Il a fallu des heures et la granulométrie n'est toujours pas très fine (promis j'arrête là pour les ruisseaux :) .

 Pour les sommets, beaucoup étaient déjà existants mais estampillés place=locality, là encore pas d'import massif que des modifications au cas par cas.

Pour me faire pardonner de ne pas vous avoir averti, je me propose pour corriger des doublons voire triplons (ex: Pointe Riri) que j'ai repéré au passage sur la côte.
N'hésitez pas à me suggérer toute correction/amélioration ou à me demander des détails.
Au plaisir
Violaine_Do (2024-11-27 18:00:44+00:00): Hello, super merci pour les précisions. Et pas besoin de te faire pardonner :D Je te rejoins, on n'est pas sur de l'import massif. La donnée est en licence compatible OSM. Et ton travail est au top, apopo et mauruuru roa! A bientot dans OSM!
dval (2024-10-16 14:30:47+00:00): Hi, agent-98! В этом пакете вы оставили название "Прохладная улица" на дороге service. Есть валидатор связности дорожной сети, который отметит такую комбинацию (название + service) как ошибку. Правильнее будет назначить этой дороге unclassified или residential или убрать название дороги. Далее: грубая ошибка с мультиполигонами по Краснотурьинской, 26. Здесь надо просто навесить на контур двух этих зданий один адрес (если он один) и ничего больше не мудрить. В правках много других оплошностей. Смотрите, что говорит валидатор JOSM и думайте, читайте ОСМВики, спрашивайте (есть, например, группа в Телеге), как исправить.
Udarian (2024-10-14 21:18:25+00:00): whats the source for this
adnvadnmbasvdgh (2024-10-15 00:54:07+00:00): https://www.waze.com/en-GB/live-map/directions?from=place.ChIJDcbQlKS22YgR0iNv0qRnUkM
Udarian (2024-10-15 02:55:14+00:00): wazes data is proprietary to them, aka they haven't given us (open street map) the right to use their data and thus we can't use their data as a source for contributions to OSM. doesn't matter what shows up on waze unless they give us (open street map) the explicit right to incorporate parts of their data into OSM we cant use waze as a source for commits.
Udarian (2024-10-18 20:33:59+00:00): as mentioned previously we (OSM) don't have the right to use Waze data as a source and since that is the source for this commit I have reverted it, for more info see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Waze .

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158067086
YomanNH (2024-11-14 11:46:54+00:00): Nie mapuj pod render. Mapowanie obszaru drogi opisane jest tu: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:area:highway?uselang=pl
Black_Diamond (2024-10-15 13:53:29+00:00): Actually the roads are not under construction. Only the homes are under construction. Please revert this change. Please see recent Mapillary imagery for details.
mookie_the_cat (2024-10-15 18:31:17+00:00): reverted changes.  sorry.  i do not know how to convey that these roads are not accessible.  they are fenced off or have temporary barriers indicating construction workers only.
Frans S (2024-10-15 10:31:40+00:00): Please use the correct tagging  of highways.
Get yourself familiar with this wiki

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India/Tags/Highway

Very narrow traces are mostly paths.
Access roads to single  buildings are mostly 
'service' roads. 
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157893429
KlopanRin (2024-10-14 19:49:36+00:00): Are you sure that the borders are correct and logical? I think it would be better to adjust the borders to the road paths or borders of سناح so it would make more sense on the map, and the same with that small area of Aden-Ald Data - Yarim Rd to have a matching path with the border while preserving the road's accuracy
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157893497
Hufkratzer (2024-10-15 19:29:14+00:00): Hi,
Are you sure that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1323938748 is a riding centre (leisure=horse_riding)? On PDOK aerial it looks like a riding arena, similar to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1079532359 (tags: leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian); compare https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=horse_riding
NorthCrab_upload (2024-10-14 19:50:47+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/979333420

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-07-22 13:56:45+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4869846  can you take look at that? Looks like Rostic/KFC confusion
NorthCrab_upload (2024-10-14 20:00:57+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Zieleniec":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/425071909
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/425072138
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1205124049

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Frans S (2024-10-22 15:03:15+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
A: Inaccurate mapping.
E: Buildings not squared.
High building(s) incorrect mapped. See par 20 chapter About Buildings


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157894371
Arminus (2024-10-17 08:14:56+00:00): According to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:via%20ferrata%20scale via_ferrate=yes is not a proper value. Can you set the actual difficulty for it? Otherwise safety_rope=yes would be a less optimal tag.
memch (2024-10-17 17:20:39+00:00): Hi
Because your linked website is in german, i write in german.
Ich habe mit "meiner" Suche (https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1yn4) bemerkt, dass hier nur der zweite Teil als Klettersteig angegeben ist, daher habe ich alle Tags in den ersten Teil übernommen.
Ich weiss nicht genau, wie ein Klettersteig sauber getaggt wird, würde aber mithelfen.
Gruss, Martin (memch@gmx.ch)
Arminus (2024-12-11 12:38:02+00:00): The linked website classifies this ferrata as "F" - which could by the french F which would translate to via_ferrata_scale=0, but from looking at the images, I'd say this is at least 1 or maybe more, so I've set it accordingly in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160167019 for now since nothing happened here in 2 months.
VictorIE (2024-11-25 02:15:47+00:00): Hi,

This: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1323946345 appears to be traffic_calming=bump
b-unicycling (2024-11-30 22:24:23+00:00): You might be right there, I've retagged it
TrickyFoxy (2024-10-14 20:17:26+00:00): https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/
aTarom (2024-10-22 07:25:43+00:00): Hi, thanks for editing, can you please review this way with only the surface=yes tag?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1323948755/history
Cheers
NorthCrab_upload (2024-10-14 20:31:23+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4049756107
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/995832522

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Barroszt (2025-08-04 22:33:47+00:00): naprawione
mueschel (2024-10-19 11:06:31+00:00): Schau bitte mal nach diesem Weg, "asp=raised" sieht nach einem Fehler aus
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1323949088
Robert46798 (2024-10-21 19:39:28+00:00): In der Tat. Danke, ist behoben.
Fraxi (2025-10-23 18:22:58+00:00): n12251301033 не трябва ли да е всъщност way и barrier=bollard? Същите са като тези антипаркинг топки (https://youtu.be/biGSKjMOAAU?t=2037), но тук на видеото е показана предишната пряка източно. Ето тук(https://youtu.be/biGSKjMOAAU?t=2096 - може да върнеш 1 сек.) се виждат същите, ако се вгледаш внимателно. И тези вече са при Майор Павел Павлов.
Fraxi (2025-10-23 18:25:34+00:00): Под block си представям нещо масивно, както е на снимките в уикито: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dblock
Dimitar155 (2025-10-23 20:10:55+00:00): По-големи са отколкото изглеждат, но определено са по-малки от Морените :). bollard ми се струва че е за колчета, а това не са колчета...
Fraxi (2025-10-23 20:54:27+00:00): Прилагам няколко линка и затварям свързаната бележка, а ти, ако искаш, прави промени.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Traffic_bollard#/media/File:20131207_Istanbul_054.jpg

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mapping-several-large-stone-balls/107702/5 (цялата тема направо виж)
NorthCrab_upload (2024-10-14 20:51:16+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1323951775

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
dval (2024-10-16 13:18:02+00:00): Hi, agent-98! Нет здесь ж.д. Есть просто дорога по бывшей когда-то насыпи. Уберите, плз, свой тег.
agent-98 (2024-10-16 17:29:18+00:00): На 1982 год железная дорога была, позднее её разобрали. Карты O-40-012 и O-41-001 показывают её наличие в те годы.
dval (2024-10-17 02:37:55+00:00): Cегодня не 1982 год. Сейчас дороги нет. Почитайте внимательно ОСМВики по поводу тега abandoned.
dval (2024-10-17 03:28:43+00:00): Нашел в ОСМВики, что к ж.д. иное отношение по сравнению с другими объектами, что частью мэпперов допускается рисовать то, чего уже нет. Но в этом случае вы могли бы просто навесить доп. тэги на существующий вэй и дорисовать только то, чего нет. Зачем засорять базу дополнительными линиями, идущими или одна по другой, или рядом, как рядом с Брусничным, хотя там один вэй?
NorthCrab_upload (2024-10-14 21:11:06+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2986115610
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/395561402

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
uprkos (2024-10-22 21:25:14+00:00): Cześć, przejrzyj proszę te edycje, jest trochę literówek: w nazwie sanepidu, szkoły jazdy, w wielu miejscach niepoprawnie użyta jest mała litera zamiast wielkiej.

W dodatku kilka obiektów zawiera nazwę opisową a nie własną, np. "Montaż anten satelitarnych i naziemnych" czy "Tłumaczenia" to raczej nie są nazwy własne firmy. Do tego bardziej nadaje się tag Inscription lub Description.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-05 16:27:01+00:00): Proszę, przeczytaj komentarz powyżej i popraw swoje edycje

np. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12251343134
silversurfer83 (2024-10-15 19:03:45+00:00): Hi :)

kannst du dich erinnern, welches VZ den access regelt?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157896410
Pemu (2024-10-16 11:26:18+00:00): Roter Kreis auf Weiß, darunter eine Ausnahme. Keine Ahnung, vermutlich "Landwirtschaftlicher" (tippe ich drauf) oder "forstwirtschaftlicher Verkehr frei".
silversurfer83 (2024-10-17 18:05:07+00:00): OK.

Bei den access-Werten musst du ein wenig drauf achten, was du wann setzt.
Roter Kreis auf Weiß ist VZ250 (Verbot für Fahrzeuge aller Art [auch Fahrräder]) und wird mit dem Schlüssel "vehicle=*" abgebildet. Wenn dann die Ausnahme nur auf landwirtschaftl. gilt, dann lautet der access Wert "vehicle=agricultural".

Du hast hier "access=agricultural" gesetzt, was ALLES (vom Fußgänger bis zum LKW) nur durchlässt, wenn es landwirtschaftlicher Verkehr ist.

Guck dir mal diese schicke Übersicht hier an:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Verkehrszeichen_in_Deutschland

cheers
silversurfer83
emersonveenstra (2024-10-15 11:19:06+00:00): Hey there,

I'm not sure https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1323957813 is supposed to be tagged as a railway, could you double check that please?
tuttiton (2024-10-15 12:27:57+00:00): Hello, it's of course a mistake. fixed, thanks for checking!
redfox_ (2024-10-26 13:16:39+00:00): Bonjour,
Merci pour vous contributions. Cependant, serait-il possible d'être d'avantage explicite dans le titre de vos changesets ? Afin de permettre aux autres utilisateurs connaître la nature de vos modifications... ("p" ne veut pas dire grand chose)
Merci beaucoup ! :)
RedAuburn (2024-10-14 21:22:33+00:00): from https://sesscouts.org.uk/our-centres/bonaly/findcontactbook-bonaly/
Глеб (2024-10-14 21:32:15+00:00): https://hmg.rosavtodor.gov.ru/department/press-center/novosti/708417
Joseph R P (2024-10-20 16:55:25+00:00): Hello,

What was the reason for removing the trunk route between West Chester, Pottstown, and Allentown here?
Red0ctober22 (2024-10-20 17:02:37+00:00): Hello,
I removed the trunk route on portions of PA 100 that are undivided and only two lanes, as I did not believe that these qualify a state highway to be a trunk road. While I know trunk roads are supposed to connect cities, West Chester and Pottstown are more smaller towns while Allentown is a true city, so I felt that these portions are better as primary routes.
Joseph R P (2024-10-20 21:42:40+00:00): Trunk tags aren't primarily based on the road's physical construction (e.g. lane counts, speed limit, whether the road is divided or not, etc.), rather how it's used in the network. Though Pottstown and West Chester are nowhere near as large as Allentown is, Route 100 serves as a very busy commuter corridor, seeing much more traffic over a long distance than other nearby primary routes, per AADT data. And while Route 100 is nowhere near as congested as 662 between Reading and Allentown—considering its an important enough route that an expressway was built along it through Pottstown and that its the most direct route linking commuters and long-distance travelers between Allentown and West Chester and past Philly—I think trunk classification here would still make sense.
Red0ctober22 (2024-10-20 21:48:04+00:00): That makes sense...I had not considered AADT data but I will definitely be sure to reference it next time. 

Thanks
wardmuylaert (2026-01-18 22:02:17+00:00): Hello, I notice after it was restored as trunk, you've played with the classification of Graphite Mine Road several more times. Can you explain the logic behind these changes and why you landed on residential? Is there further discussion somewhere?
Red0ctober22 (2026-01-22 01:16:02+00:00): Yes, it turns out that PennDOT maps classify Graphite Mine Road as a "local road" or, in the context of Pennsylvania, a "township road", so by that standard, it is not at all considered part of the state highway network (evan quadrant routes), so I figured it did not belong as anything above residential.
aceman444 (2024-10-31 21:13:12+00:00): Yes, the relation had no valid 'type', intentionally. Now it still does not have a valid type. Why do you think your solution is better?
Silva1989 (2024-10-31 23:24:25+00:00): Hello
I made these edits because all relations on OSM need to have a type= tag. That's mandatory by design. That's why the disused:type tag needed to be replaced by type=something.
Thanks
aceman444 (2024-11-04 23:53:40+00:00): Ok, maybe, but the route=bus tags are not mandatory, especially in a relation that is not type=route. That change didn't need to be done.
aceman444 (2024-11-04 23:55:39+00:00): Additionally, you changed "disused:" prefix to "was:" prefix, which have different meaning. This change again isn't needed for the problem you are solving.
eggie (2024-10-15 06:32:40+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-03-27 05:56:36+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11862798350/history is wine shop part also defunct?
Greg91 (2026-05-10 22:53:42+00:00): Yes, nothing like it there since (relatively) long time
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-05-11 07:00:52+00:00): then shop=wine should be also removed, right?
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-06-16 13:47:14+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5347484
Greg91 (2026-06-28 17:15:11+00:00): I have updated all fields in a newer edit after visiting the site. Thank you for your attention to details!