piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:06:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
iandees (2026-04-26 14:52:14+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9565887286 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181849210, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
MappingMore (2026-04-28 07:08:43+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:181924196
iandees (2026-04-26 14:52:25+00:00): Hi! It looks like the website URL on way/407675581 may have been copied from Google Maps (it contained Google tracking parameters). Please be careful not to copy information from Google into OpenStreetMap, as Google's data is copyrighted.
Mapper220993 (2026-04-27 12:05:18+00:00): bicycle*
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181845795
Jordi MF (2026-04-26 20:07:51+00:00): Hola Silleiro,
Gracias po mejora la toponimia de Galicia, pero tn cuidado cuando elimines algunos elementos. Ene ste cahgneset eliminaste el "hamlet" A Anunciada poque considerabas que estaba repetido. Puede ser que así fuese, pero eliminando dicho nodo, eliminaste etiquetas importantes como ref:ine.

Recuperé dicho nodo.
Saludos
iandees (2026-04-26 14:52:56+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6012744662 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181849249, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
t_ja (2026-04-26 17:40:54+00:00): Ahoj,
kedze este len zacinas s mapovanim do OpenStreetMap, odporucam nastudovat si zakreslovane objekty na OSM Wiki. V tomto konkretnom pripade sa jedna o sposob zakreslenia pripajacich/odbocovacich pruhov, ktore sa znacia vylucne cez tag "lanes" (pripadne aj "lanes:forward" a "lanes:backward", ak je rozdielny pocet pruhov pre kazdy smer jazdy), az kym sa fyzicky neoddelia: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lanes#Motorway_with_lanes_and_destinations
Taktiez pri kresleni subeznych ciest treba upravovat nielen hodnotu tagu "lanes", ale taktiez aj "lanes:forward" a "lanes:backward".

S pozdravom
Tibor
FajrAl (2026-04-26 13:59:09+00:00): revert changeset made by uid="24066959"
FajrAl (2026-04-26 14:03:53+00:00): revert changeset made by uid="23432689"
ajmat (2026-04-27 12:06:09+00:00): Revert of 181841695
FajrAl (2026-04-27 12:09:49+00:00): Ah yes, thank you. Forgot to mention it
SomeoneElse (2026-05-07 16:49:25+00:00): Hello (ref https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20251),
Please do explain what a revert is for an what objects are in error.
In this case a new user had added an unlikely motorway with their first edit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181841493 .  It did make sense to revert the data (no motorways in this part of Java) but it also makes sense to be a bit more friendly about what the problem was and add a bit more explanation here.
FajrAl (2026-05-07 22:30:21+00:00): Hi DWG team, I believe there might be a misunderstanding. This user added fictional military landuse in an area that is actually a protected forest and tourist attraction. Regarding the 'motorway' mention, this changeset does not involve any motorways. Could you please double-check if that comment was intended for this specific case?
FajrAl (2026-05-12 11:26:59+00:00): Dear DWG team, as you may notice, I have responded to all your comments. As this dialogue demonstrates, these issues are easily resolved through discussion. I firmly believe communication should come first, rather than blocking first and commenting later; consistent with the OSMF Ban Policy (https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Ban_Policy), which emphasizes that blocks should be a last resort after communication fails. I have shared further thoughts on this procedure here: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/critique-on-data-working-group-communication-procedures/143687
elforsan-elsare3a (2026-06-03 10:43:52+00:00): مرحبا ، اؤكد ان مؤسسة الفرسان السريعة لنقل الاثاث تمتلك مقرا ماديا ومكتبا فعليا مستقلا في هذا الموقع الدقيق بالدمام ، ولدينا لافتة خارجية وسجل تجاري يثبت تواجدنا في هذه الاحداثيات ، الموقع ليس منطقة خدمة افتراضية ، ارجو مراجعة الحذف او اعلامي بالوسوم البرمجية الدقيقة المطلوبة لاعادة النقطة بما يتوافق تماما مع معايير الخريطة
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2026-06-03 12:28:00+00:00): آسف لذلك، نظرا لكثرة الرسائل الاقتحامية من مؤسسات نقل الأثاث ظننت الموقع وهمي وقمت بحذفه، لذلك أعتذر منك وتم استعادة الموقع هنا:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183591698#map=19/26.430740/50.104344&layers=D
silversurfer83 (2026-04-26 20:15:35+00:00): Moin :)

guck mal deine Baustelle an. Den nördlichsten node hast du mit der Pipeline verbunden. 

happy mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181848308
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:11:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
MappingMore (2026-05-02 04:14:16+00:00):  Revert of 181838573
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:11:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:08:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
iandees (2026-04-26 14:53:16+00:00): Hello! I noticed that nodes https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1687015893, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4889206924 were moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181849264, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:01:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
salma_z (2026-04-29 09:12:45+00:00): Hello JASMINE ALAA ELDIN, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
I noticed your recent edits regarding buildings and roads, but I would like to point out some technical issues that need to be corrected to follow OSM standards:

(Building Shapes & Imagery): The buildings you've drawn do not match the satellite imagery in terms of shape or scale. Please ensure that all features are traced accurately based on available imagery.

( Incorrect use of the Name tag): The name=* tag should only contain the actual name of the building or street. Large numbers or codes should not be placed here.
Reference: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name

(Geocode Issues): The geocodes you are adding to nodes are incorrect and misplaced. OSM generates its own location data; manually adding random codes to tags is not standard practice.
Reference: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ref (If these are reference numbers).

( Road Overlapping): Some roads are overlapping with buildings or other roads. In OSM, the network should be clean and connected properly without unnecessary overlaps.
Reference: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Data_Working_Group/OSM_object_filter_guide/Overlapping_Objects

(Changeset Comments): When saving your edits, please provide a clear and descriptive comment about what you have done. Using unclear characters like "." makes it difficult for other mappers to understand your changes. A good comment should explain what was added or modified.

Reference: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments


Please go back and review these edits, and kindly correct them to match the imagery and follow the proper tagging standards. You can use the LearnOSM.org guide for help.
We appreciate your enthusiasm and want to help you contribute high-quality data to the map.

Best regards,
salma_z
JASMINE ALAA ELDIN (2026-05-06 17:33:21+00:00): itis a task that we have to do so i did it in this way  the task have to be done by this way
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181849085
salma_z (2026-05-11 08:38:59+00:00): Hello JASMINE ALAA ELDIN
I’ve followed up with the user privately to explain why the changes were reverted and to ensure they have a clear understanding of OSM tagging and mapping standards.
Best regards,
salma_z
DetectiveConan (2026-05-04 13:22:44+00:00): You've broken the boundary relations of Lashio Township and Lashio District: their original ways have been lost! I'm now going to redraw it based on histories. If you're not familiar with boundary relations, please don't try to modify it!

你把腊戌乡和腊戌区的边界关系破坏了：他们的原始路线全都被丢掉了！我现在要重新根据历史记录重画，如果你对边界关系不熟悉，请千万不要尝试修改！
silversurfer83 (2026-04-26 20:13:52+00:00): Hi Maarten,

nice of you to take care of this chain.

There are some questions though:

Where did you get the data you used and is the license compatible to our ODbL?

Did you discuss this edit at c.osm.org before you pulled through?

cheers
MaartenTheMapper (2026-04-27 12:16:29+00:00): Hi there!

I used the physical addresses and URLs from their own website. That is not typically copyrighted information, see also https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licensing_Working_Group/Minutes/2023-08-14#Ticket#2023081110000064_—_First_party_websites_as_sources . The default tagging is automatically pulled from NSI.

I did not discuss this in the respective communities, as it was not an automated edit and I don't think these edits are very controversial.

Cheers
silversurfer83 (2026-05-03 11:33:55+00:00): Sorry for the delayed answer:

Thanks for the quick reply.

You deleted a bunch of POI and you added quite a few all without survey and all without discussing it.

Deletion without survey is wrong in my opinion. POI should be tagged according to the info you gained which means addind a note or a fixme. For closed shops we have lifecycle prefixes.

Addidng POI without survey is also not good. Is there anything else mapped here? Is the data you used as base really up to date?

This shouldn't hace been done like this, if you ask me
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181849594
MaartenTheMapper (2026-05-03 12:46:53+00:00): It is a guideline in the Netherlands (I have noticed other countries don't do this) to add the POI data to the address node. Some previous mappers erroneously created a separate node for the POI, which I merged with the address node in this changeset. The newer of the two nodes then shows up as deleted, but no data was lost and no POI was actually removed.

As for the new POIs: I'm willing to add a fixme saying 'not yet physically surveyed' if that alleviates your concerns.
silversurfer83 (2026-05-03 14:28:24+00:00): Thanks for the explanation.

I think it's fine with the added fixme then.

happy mapping :)
Juke9573 (2026-04-28 16:13:24+00:00): Frage zu den Hydrant: worauf basierst du diese? Ich habe heute keine vorgefunden. Weder auf den Gehweg, noch auf den Fahrbahn.
Die Angaben vom Hydrantschild aus meiner Notiz enden ja auf der Grünstreifen, wo ich leider nichts finden konnte, aber vielleicht ist es ja zugewachsen.
Geo Dät (2026-04-29 07:09:00+00:00): Ich bin nur selten in Gräfenhausen. Bei der nächsten Tour schaue ich noch mal nach. Aber wenn du sicher bist, dass dort kein Unterflur(!)hydrant  ist, dann lösche doch einfach den Knoten. Ich halte ohnehin die Kartierung der Millionen von Unterflufhydranten für reichlich übertrieben. Die Feuerwehren usw. haben mit Sicherheit genaue und vollständigen Karten und werden sich kaum auf OSM verlassen.
Symbolbild: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Berlin_hydrant_20050211_p1000517.jpg
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-27 05:26:21+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

The proposed name sounds like a descriptive or sarcastic phrase rather than an official name for a natural water feature. 

Best regards.
dadavid (2026-04-28 08:54:40+00:00): reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181928482
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:10:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
felipeeugenio (2026-04-26 20:41:23+00:00): Estimado, Primero usted mismo le puso como nombre Castapiedra, Luego de eso lo cambió a Piedrabuena. y ahora le cambia el nombre por tercera vez diciendo que vive ahí. Le pedimos por favor una aclaración. Solo para saber. Saludos
dadavid (2026-04-28 09:06:53+00:00): looking at the users history, surely this is also vandalism, right?
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-26 16:57:19+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM. What is „thuis"? Best regards
eggie (2026-04-26 18:18:07+00:00): Dag msgnauerna,

Beter geen persoonlijke informatie toevoegen aan OSM.
Ik heb name=thuis  (My home)   verwijderd.

MVG
eggie
olo81 (2026-07-13 14:52:39+00:00): Co to jest?
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-26 16:55:37+00:00): Hi, personal information? Best regards.
Ma4G (2026-05-09 19:27:43+00:00): Moin, ist das Flink Lager nicht mehr in dem Laden?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8636525961

Ich wollte gerade gucken ob das korrekt als dark_store gemapped ist.
kytta (2026-05-23 11:02:23+00:00): Ich war vorgestern da; drin war Licht und es schien noch da zu sein.

Die Flink-API gibt diesen Laden auch als nächsten Darkstore zurück, wenn man in der Nähe sucht: https://api.goflink.com/hub-locator/hub-locator/v1/locations/hub?lat=52.2620&long=10.5139
Ma4G (2026-05-23 11:33:57+00:00): Dann sollten wir das wohl restoren. Oder, Napolegnom, was denkst du?
Napolegnom (2026-05-27 17:07:42+00:00): Wenn es den Laden noch gibt (dieser dann aber einfach nicht öffentlich zugänglich ist), definitiv restoren.
kytta (2026-05-28 21:13:47+00:00): Habe ich in https://osm.org/changeset/183325008 restored
paulatthehug (2026-04-27 07:42:32+00:00): Hi, can you tell me your verifiable source for your naming of the burn, which is composed of several ways, running from Auldearn to the River Nairn? That is known locally as 'Auldearn Burn' and I write as a local resident and local authority councillor so I speak with some certainty. If it does have a Gaelic name that is not its common name in this area.

Similarly in Inverness you've changed Mill Burn's 'name' to a Gaelic name which you've added. Again the common name of that burn is Mill Burn and indeed the Highland Council ward it passes in Inverness Millburn which provides a pretty authoritative source, so what's your source for treating the Gaelic name as primary.

Neither of these areas are primarily Gaelic speaking, if anything the second language in Nairn at least still is Scots despite the upsurge in interest in Gaelic. So unless there are special circumstances I would be very surprised to see a Gaelic name being recorded in the 'name' tag, I'd expect 'name:gd' to be used (as indeed you've done with the River Nairn ... although I confess am surprised by your source and source:name).
jSeke (2026-04-27 07:55:54+00:00): Hello! the village of Auldearn is named after that burn, both are called Allt Èireann in Gaelic, literally meaning "Irish burn" (https://www.ainmean-aite.scot/?id=38838). Ordnance survey doesn't show any name for that burn in any language but if there is a common Scots name then by all means add it too.

For the burns in Inverness, the tributaries all only have Gaelic names and it too has had a Gaelic name since its first recording (https://www.ainmean-aite.scot/?id=42486). The settlement obviously is called Millburn officially but the burn is more known in Gaelic than English.

lastly, if you looked through the history you'd see it wasn't me that added those source and source:name tags
paulatthehug (2026-04-27 13:19:42+00:00): Although this is not a source we can quote the Ordnance Survey do name both Mill Burn and Auldearn Burn on their closed data mapping (to which I have access through my work as a councillor). They do not quote any Gaelic names.

But fundamentally the OSM wiki at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names makes it clear that "[name] is set to the *primary name of the feature in the real world*."

In the case of the former I can be definitive that Auldearn Burn is its primary name.

I have changed Auldearn Burn's 'name' to Auldearn Burn and add your Gaelic name as 'name:gd'. I've also merged the various ways making up the burn into a relation. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20595033#map=14/57.57586/-3.83702&layers=N
mapbear66 (2026-04-27 16:15:32+00:00): The name of Mill Burn is the only name in current common usage. Your source is bogus as it's an old reference, not a guide to current names. 
It's been known as Mill Burn since at least 1892. 
Stop trying to make everything Gaelic, you do the language a disservice.
tux67 (2026-05-04 07:01:45+00:00): Hm, das ist verwirrend .. lt. Kommentar hat StreetComplete hier bestimmen wollen ob Fuß und Radweg getrennt sind - eingetragen hast du aber ein sidewalk=yes auf dem Rad/Fußweg .. (Hätte aber segregated=no sein sollen https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:segregated?uselang=de ) 
Oder wolltest du sagen daß es sich um einen reinen Fußweg handelt?
Das sidewalk=yes/left/right/both kommt auf die Hauptstraße, wenn der Fußweg nicht separat gemappt ist.
The Invisible Freak (2026-05-04 16:12:34+00:00): Oh, da habe ich mich wohl vertan.
Tatsächlich ist auf dem Abschnitt zwischen der Straße "Am Heidehof" (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=51.10371110000099&lng=6.172889299998587&z=19.48268165909942&pKey=799877390956041&focus=photo) und kurz vor der Bergstraße (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=51.10199299999999&lng=6.164901299999997&z=19.48268165909942&pKey=5713060285399229&focus=photo) in beiden Richtungen kein ausgewiesener Radstreifen. Radfahrer müssen hier also entweder auf dem Gehweg fahren oder die Straße ausweichen.
Auf der Kirchstraße endet der abgegrenzte Bereich für Radfahrer auf der Fahrbahn im Bereich der Abzweigung auf die Burgstraße (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=51.10166327800101&lng=6.163316884976439&z=19.48268165909942&pKey=2137265333239123&focus=photo). Obwohl die Bilder schon etwas älter sind ist das tatsächlich noch so.
tux67 (2026-05-04 16:35:26+00:00): OK, dann sind diese Stücke entweder highway=footway oder path mit foot=designated und bicycle=no
Hoffen wir mal, das darüber keine Radrouten Relation läuft ;-)
tux67 (2026-05-05 06:41:26+00:00): Ist angepasst -- schau mal bitte ob's passt
The Invisible Freak (2026-05-05 16:52:40+00:00): Ja, so passt es.

Wenn ich mir den Kreisverkehr Erkelenzer/Brabanter bzw. Klosterstraße ansehe (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/250533112), müsste der aber vermutlich auch noch angepasst werden. Dort gibt es nämlich auch einen gemeinsamen Rad-/Gehweg wie man z.B. hier (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=51.10095812127017&lng=6.18210891008971&z=19.48268165909942&pKey=800982510955139&focus=photo) ganz gut erkennen kann.
tux67 (2026-05-06 06:54:46+00:00): ok, der Kreisverkehr ist jetzt auch (wieder) mit den richtigen tags versehen. Hatte ein Kollege scheinbar versehentlich gelöscht.
mavl (2026-04-27 14:09:17+00:00): Добрый вечер. Это не совсем тоннель. Это проезд [неподземный] сквозь насыпь в виде тоннеля. То есть дорога "тоннеля" проходит на уровне земли (level=0), а дорога над ним (level=1) проходит по насыпи.  
Дорог ниже уровне земли (level<0) в этом месте нет.
alexey_zakharenkov (2026-04-27 14:56:27+00:00): Здравствуйте.

Я не считаю свою правку 100% верной, но хочется всё же разобраться. Почему в этом месте Вы пометили дорогу протяжённостью почти 1 км с тегом embankment тегом layer=1? Многие дороги лежат на насыпи и не несут этого тега.
Почему похожая дорога https://www.osm.org/way/538337453 с embankment=yes не имеет layer=1?

Я это понимаю так: насыпи в OSM считаются поверхностью земли, имеющей свой рельеф (просто зачастую искусственный, а не естественный).

Из вики: "Unlike bridges, a layer tag is rarely needed for embankments and should not be used without a good reason."
mavl (2026-04-27 16:44:42+00:00):     > Почему в этом месте Вы пометили дорогу протяжённостью почти 1 км с тегом embankment тегом layer=1?  
  
Потому что эта дорога пересекается с другими дорогами на разной высоте. Есть пешеходный тоннель - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/377841985  
  
Есть автомобильный тоннель - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/310657901  
  
Между этими тоннелями 500 метров, а потом через 300 метров мост.
  
    > Почему похожая дорога way/538337453 с embankment=yes не имеет layer=1?  
  
Потому что эта дорога не пересекается с другими дорогами (или другими объектами, типа рек).  
  
    > Я это понимаю так: насыпи в OSM считаются поверхностью земли...  
  
Вы правы. Так оно и есть, когда нет пересечений с другими объектами. Здесь две дороги пересекают трассу на разной высоте и приходится добавлять layer. Тот же валидатор JOSM'а при пересечении линий ожидает либо общую точку, либо layer.
VLD0251 (2026-04-26 18:17:43+00:00): You have made over 5,000 edits without providing any edit summaries or sources !
قمت بإجراء أكثر من 5000 تعديل دون تقديم أي تعليق أو مصدر
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=2812514
VLD0251 (2026-04-26 18:16:54+00:00): You have made over 5,000 edits without providing any edit summaries or sources !
قمت بإجراء أكثر من 5000 تعديل دون تقديم أي تعليق أو مصدر
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=2812514
VLD0251 (2026-04-26 18:14:07+00:00): You have made over 5,000 edits without providing any edit summaries or sources !
قمت بإجراء أكثر من 5000 تعديل دون  تقديم أي تعليق أو مصدر
VLD0251 (2026-04-26 18:13:53+00:00): You have made over 5,000 edits without providing any edit summaries or sources !
قمت بإجراء أكثر من 5000 تعديل دون  تقديم أي تعليق أو مصدر
VLD0251 (2026-04-26 18:13:40+00:00): You have made over 5,000 edits without providing any edit summaries or sources !
قمت بإجراء أكثر من 5000 تعديل دون  تقديم أي تعليق أو مصدر
VLD0251 (2026-04-26 18:13:25+00:00): You have made over 5,000 edits without providing any edit summaries or sources !
قمت بإجراء أكثر من 5000 تعديل دون  تقديم أي تعليق أو مصدر
VLD0251 (2026-04-26 18:13:04+00:00): You have made over 5,000 edits without providing any edit summaries or sources !
قمت بإجراء أكثر من 5000 تعديل دون  تقديم أي تعليق أو مصدر
FajrAl (2026-05-27 07:53:03+00:00): nama jalan hanya berikan nama saja, tidak boleh alamat lengkap
Bienson (2026-04-27 00:42:15+00:00): Hallo,

Öffnungszeiten werden in englischsprachiger Notation eingetragen.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours#Werte

https://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/?setLng=de

Das cuisine-Tag sollte nicht die gesamte Speisekarte abbilden, ein übergeordnetes cuisine=mexican reicht.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:cuisine


Korrigiert in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181868675