piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2026-01-29 07:04:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13506816301 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Dressing Shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-06 06:06:38+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178169403
(No visible changes after review)
NeisBot (2026-01-29 07:04:46+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13506821401 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Boutique de vêtements"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-02-06 06:06:39+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/177854438
VLD0251 (2026-01-28 17:38:57+00:00): Thanks for the addition! the contact:facebook tag should not contain a Google Maps link, and the name field is too long, it should only contain the cafe's name.
Thanks!
NeisRevert (2026-01-28 14:47:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/177808851
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
NeisRevert (2026-01-28 14:47:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/177808848
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
NeisRevert (2026-01-28 14:47:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/177808833
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
NeisRevert (2026-01-28 14:47:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/177808821
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
NeisRevert (2026-01-28 14:49:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/177808903
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
NeisRevert (2026-01-28 14:49:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/177808887
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
NeisRevert (2026-01-28 14:49:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/177808884
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
NeisRevert (2026-01-28 14:48:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/177808862
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
Taya_S (2026-01-28 14:54:37+00:00): Whoa, you spelled my name correctly this time! I knew you had it in you!
SomeoneElse (2026-01-28 15:01:32+00:00): Thanks!
pitscheplatsch (2026-01-28 15:02:14+00:00): You're welcome.
AndresDuhour (2026-01-31 11:52:47+00:00): Buen día! te escribo por el agregado de un punto de una feria cerca del río. Sería para proponer la creación de ese espacio? Saludos! Andrés
NeisBot (2026-01-29 07:04:47+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/713697580 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Roofing company"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-06 06:06:39+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178169404
(No visible changes after review)
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-27 11:11:26+00:00): Cleaned up mistagging for Lucid Private Offices POI in changeset 184688217

https://osm.org/changeset/184688217
eggie (2026-01-28 15:52:39+00:00): Willy..
Tag:building=static_caravan is voldoende. Niet name=Caravan gebruiken.
We taggen ook niet name=boom, name=bankje.
Groet,
eggie
eggie (2026-01-28 20:43:39+00:00): Oneigenlijke tagging verwijderd.
MVG
eggie
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-28 23:22:14+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13506798066

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eggie (2026-01-28 17:12:02+00:00): Wanneer dit een loods is dan tag je bv building=barn

.. name=Loods is niet correct.
Mvg
eggie
RolandHUN_Mapper (2026-01-28 14:56:11+00:00): *Somlyó-sziget feltöltése terülthasználatokkal: mezőgazdasági területek 3.*
AlbaireN (2026-01-28 15:00:44+00:00): Je copie-colle ma note :
Je viens de remarquer qu'il n'y avait ni panneau réglementaire (C113) ni marquage réglementaire des bandes cyclables. De plus, les accotements cyclables disparaissent progressivement grignotés par l'herbe.

Voir ce sujet : https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/accotements-revetus/31099
Ca me semble pertinent de modifier les tags de cet axe en ce sens (shoulder). J'essaierai de me motiver à aller mesurer sur place.

PS : pas encore mesurer sur place
Taya_S (2026-01-28 15:14:44+00:00): Restored house and address data

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177809832
Taya_S (2026-01-28 15:20:12+00:00): Please see: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19709
NeisBot (2026-01-29 07:04:49+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13506833417 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Roofing contractor office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-06 06:06:40+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178169405
(No visible changes after review)
felipeeugenio (2026-01-30 14:55:27+00:00): Hola. Mas que un name= para esas pistas. Da la idea que lo corresponde es un ref=. O realmente se llaman así?

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177809447
qstep (2026-01-28 16:29:13+00:00): Üdv! Ráraktál az útra egy magánbejáratot. Ebből nem derült ki, hogy melyik hátra vonatkozik, így töröltem.

Kérlek, szerkesztés előtt olvasd el a https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/ vonatkozó részeit, vagy használd a jegyzet létrehozása funkciót.

További jó térképezést!
qstep (2026-01-28 16:29:36+00:00): *házra
qstep (2026-01-28 16:21:41+00:00): Szia! Egyrészt az entrance címke az bejáratokra vonatkozik, az általad megadott érték semmiképp nem jó. 

Továbbá ez nagyon úgy tűnik, hogy egy magánépület. Van esetleg fotód a helyszínről? Ebben a formában visszavonnám ezt a szerkesztést.
Attila0474 (2026-01-29 08:41:07+00:00): Ez egy parkban van ahol van egy színpad.  Ez az épület egy színpad es ott a hátamögött van a konnektor.  Legközelebb amikor arra biciklizek akkor lefotózom.
qstep (2026-01-28 16:15:31+00:00): Üdv! Létrehoztál két új node-ot az ebike töltőknek, de már volt ott egy `power=outlet` címkével jelzett feltételezem konnektor. Ez egy dedikált ebike töltőállomás, vagy pedig csak egy nyilvánosan használható dugalj?

Illetve a WC-nél felvetted, hogy `access=private`. Ez a címke azt jelenti, hogy magánterületen van, és csak a tulajdonos(ok) használhatják. Biztosan nem nyilvános WC-ről van szó?
Attila0474 (2026-01-29 08:45:30+00:00): A wc levan zárva. Azt csak akkor nyitják ki ha vendégek vannak. Nyáron visznek oda egy tank vizet amit lehet használni mivel a víz  ami az épületben folyik nem.iható a gondozó szerint.

A pényásás épület mellet ahol a.padok.vannak, oda egy tetőt építettek es és ott található a 230v konnektor 
 Ezt.mindenre.lehet használni a gondozó szerint, szóval jelöltem ebike töltőpontnak.mivel.mar sokszor töltöttünk ott.
qstep (2026-01-29 09:20:53+00:00): Ez esetben a WC legyen access=customers , ami általában ügyfeleket/vendégeket jelöl. Bővebben: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access

A konnektort megbeszéltük PM-ben :)
Taya_S (2026-01-28 18:04:54+00:00): Hi Mario

Thanks for contributing. Could you please write more descriptive changeset comments? Unfortunately "." doesn't convey enough information for other users to know what you've edited. 

You can find examples of good changeset comments here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Additionally, please do not write names in all caps, and make sure to only use the name tag for actual names, not descriptions.

Best regards,
Taya Snijder
Herman Lee (2026-02-02 06:32:45+00:00): 本修改集已退回，详见：https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177992072
IvanaŠokčević (2026-02-19 10:19:59+00:00): Reverted incorrect tagging south of Tom Drive based on streetside footage; tag remains only north of Tom Drive, fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178093557 #OptimoRoute
eggie (2026-01-28 16:11:57+00:00): Welkom bij OSM,

Feedback.. Lijkt me prima zo.

MVG
eggie
NeisBot (2026-01-29 07:04:51+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/8171950099 v4

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Jewelry store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-06 06:06:40+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178169406
(No visible changes after review)
Herman Lee (2026-02-02 06:32:37+00:00): 本修改集已退回，详见：https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177992072
NeisBot (2026-01-29 07:04:52+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/12029850083 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Boutique store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-06 06:06:41+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178169407
(No visible changes after review)
cyclist789 (2026-02-07 13:05:39+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13506720266
Du har fjernet natural=peak fra Bøgebanke. Jeg håbede, at du ville acceptere mine Peaks, hvis jeg tilføjede "peak=hill" som et ekstra mærke.
Lige nu har punktet hverken natural=peak eller natural=hill.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dhill
Hvordan definerer du overhovedet natural=hill? Er det det samme som natural=peak, men mindre spids? Er "elevation" målt ved bunden af bakken, som for tårne, eller skal det ses som et enkelt punkt på toppen af bakken, ligesom Peak?

Det er fjollet hvis vi redigerer på hinandens punkter på denne måde. Burde vi tilkalde en moderator?
osmviborg (2026-02-07 14:07:31+00:00): slap dog af, har du aldrig laver en fejl?
cyclist789 (2026-02-07 17:39:40+00:00): Jeg er ganske afslappet. Tak for de bygninger du tilføjede.
NeisBot (2026-01-29 07:04:54+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13469307976 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Vape shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-06 06:06:41+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178169409
(No visible changes after review)
NeisBot (2026-01-29 07:04:56+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/3686607132 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Italian restaurant"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-07 07:48:36+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178216929
(No visible changes after review)
Udarian (2026-01-28 19:48:04+00:00): have you checked if the address 5700 Biscayne Boulevard no longer exists because if it still does it should have been removed from the building and placed into a node before the tags were removed from the building to turn it into the inner of the multipolygon.

Happy Mapping,
Udar.
squeaker_andrus (2026-01-30 13:26:39+00:00): The logic behind this changeset is similar to the previous one, which you also commented on. However, the situation here is slightly different, as earlier data suggests that this area, based on imagery, has been rebuilt, and instead of several buildings, there is the large one now.
I don’t have information if the previous address is still relevant for this new building. 
I am really sorry if I made something wrong. So, please, let me know if I need to add this address again.
Sincerely, squeaker_andrus.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177810830
eggie (2026-01-28 15:47:11+00:00): Dag A West .. Probeer svp op de bestaande adresnode bij te taggen.
Format postcode zonder spatie.
Mvg,
eggie
NeisBot (2026-01-29 07:04:57+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13502299284 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Farm store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-07 07:48:36+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178216930
(No visible changes after review)
Taya_S (2026-01-28 16:22:01+00:00): I have reverted this edit, as it dragged a waterway node halfway across the globe

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177812503
Taya_S (2026-01-28 16:24:00+00:00): Whatever editor you are using, it seems to have a bug where it mixes up way IDs and node IDs. You intended to edit this way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/754426251, but instead ended up moving those node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/754426251 by 7800km
Herman Lee (2026-02-02 06:32:31+00:00): 本修改集已退回，详见：https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177992072
eggie (2026-01-28 16:10:20+00:00): Dag Awest.
De info heb ik even samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode.
Dan staat de plaatsnaam er ook bij.

MVG
eggie
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-28 22:42:24+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1418062904

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-28 23:22:11+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1418062904

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
CRCulver (2026-02-01 17:32:29+00:00): What is the source for these building heights you have been adding?
Jobigutenburg (2026-02-01 18:29:20+00:00): The heights were estimated based on the number of visible floors in aerial imagery, using a typical floor-to-floor height. They are approximate values, not surveyed measurements.
CRCulver (2026-02-01 20:20:07+00:00): I must admit, I’m uncomfortable with such guesswork. Have you received community approval for such a large number of edits?
Jobigutenburg (2026-02-01 20:32:32+00:00): Thanks for explaining your concern, and that’s understandable.

To clarify, I didn’t add random values. The heights were calculated from existing 'building:levels' by applying a consistent floor-to-floor height and accounting for visible podiums or roof structures where applicable. That said, I agree these are approximations rather than surveyed data.

I didn’t seek prior community approval for this batch, and I’m open to retagging these as estimated (e.g. source:height=estimated) or reverting the heights if the community considers this inappropriate.
CRCulver (2026-02-01 20:51:05+00:00): Several 3D renderers I am familiar with already display building height by approximating from the number of levels. So, adding an approximation to OSM itself doesn’t really provide anything new for map users, it only introduces possible inaccuracies into the database. I urge you to start a post at community.openstreetmap.org and explain clearly what you have been doing. It may be that the prevailing opinion will be that all these changesets must be reverted.
CRCulver (2026-02-17 01:55:54+00:00): What happened with seeking community support? Did you post on the forum? I’d be inclined to escalate this to the DWG for a mass-revert if this hasn’t been discussed and generally approved.
Jobigutenburg (2026-02-17 07:14:15+00:00): All buildings were within one city and already had building:levels.
I derived height=* using a consistent floor-height assumption.
I understand that applying this method at scale may require prior discussion.
I will pause further edits and open a forum thread to discuss whether this approach is acceptable. 
If the community prefers that height values be survey-based only, I’m willing to revert these edits.
Wise_Turtle (2026-01-28 17:15:51+00:00): У вас получился большой луг (где должен быть лес), внутри маленькие луга, ещё и с самопересечением. Мультиполигон с самопересечением не может отображаться на карте.
Wise_Turtle (2026-01-28 17:25:10+00:00): Только не удаляйте, там легко исправить. Если не сможете сами разобраться, напишите здесь, я исправлю.
balint36 (2026-02-26 23:42:05+00:00): Hát, Kétegyháza telje4sen szét lett kutyulva. Köszi.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-21 04:47:15+00:00): SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more information.

Cleaned up SEO spam POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags/values in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/186095339
Udarian (2026-01-28 20:29:46+00:00): When you can see both the base and the roof of a building in the aerial imagery it should be aligned to the base of the building, thus several of the changes in this changeset are seemingly incorrect. See the following wiki pages for more details:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Roof_modelling and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Buildings

Happy mapping,
Udar.
hlfan (2026-01-28 19:56:33+00:00): Ich hab in changeset/177819274 noch meinen Senf dazugegeben.
mcliquid (2026-02-01 12:22:01+00:00): Hello Peter Elvidge, thank you for contributing to the HOTOSM project and supporting the Mozambique Floods 2026 response. Your help is appreciated.

A quick note regarding this changeset: it contains edits ranging from the United Kingdom to Mozambique, which is a very large geographic spread. For HOTOSM tasks, it’s important that each changeset stays strictly within the project’s task area. Edits outside the task boundary can make validation harder and may interfere with coordinated humanitarian mapping.

For future HOTOSM work, please consider:

making sure all edits belong only to the active task area,

uploading your changes before editing in a different region or country,

keeping each changeset focused on a single project and location.

This helps validators and project coordinators review contributions efficiently, especially during time-critical disaster responses.

Thanks again for your support, and happy mapping!
Jarek 🚲 (2026-01-28 17:04:47+00:00): The other alternative would be to tag motorway_link to the last spot where not going on the freeway is possible, but that is all the way up at Bloor/Drumsnab (if you get on the ramp at Bloor, you _are_ going on the freeway, there's no other way except for the blocked-off service ways). That was tagged in the past, but removed by jamaps in 2020, I don't feel strongly enough to restore that
coatix (2026-01-28 17:46:54+00:00): Ich denke du hast da unabsichtlich noch was anders verändert, repariert in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177815521
TAbfalter (2026-01-28 22:03:28+00:00): Ja, das war unabsichtlich. Vielen Dank für's reparieren!
whb (2026-01-29 06:45:48+00:00): Guten Tag,

warum entfernst du eigentlich die Quellenangabe?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/243775840/history

Viele Grüße
whb
Niiepce (2026-01-30 11:33:31+00:00): Hallo whb,

Ich entferne source bzw. source:geometry, wenn ich die Geometrie überarbeite oder vor Ort / anhand aktueller Daten überprüft habe, sodass die ursprüngliche Quelle nicht mehr zutrifft, da es üblicher ist Quellangaben nicht an Objekten sondern an Changesets zu setzen.

Viele Grüße
Niiepce