piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
silversurfer83 (2024-05-07 08:18:57+00:00): Ach guck. Hatte ich noch gar nicht auf dem Schirm :)

Danke für den Hinweis. Wieder was gelernt
eggie (2024-05-23 15:15:38+00:00): Hi  This is not a cycleway..

I changed it back to highway=path.
bicycle=yes will do the job.
Greetz,
eggie
Ken Woods (2024-05-23 15:58:26+00:00): I can look out of my window and, in fact, see that it's a cycleway.  

Please tell me by what basis you think you're overriding that?
eggie (2024-05-23 16:01:36+00:00): A cycleway has an traffic_sign
G11, G13 G12a

What sign is present?
eggie (2024-05-23 16:03:42+00:00): Traffic_sign according info from the Communit Hillegom
https://smoothefiets.ddns.net/html/verkeersbordenkaart/index.php?lat=52.290588301&lng=4.589935541&z=19
Leo Slager (2024-04-16 13:00:11+00:00): Dag Jesse, je vraagt om enreview:

Aan de wzijde van de A38 staat nu een node met de tag traffic_sign=yes.
Dat zegt helaas niets.
Je moet het verkeersbord dus benoemen zoals je ook aan de Ozijde hebt gedaan.
Zie ook:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Overzicht_Nederlandse_Verkeersborden
Succes met verder mappen.
Geogast (2024-05-01 15:27:28+00:00): Hola gunnar1m!
Veo que estás cambiando muchos tags de estaciones de tren en desuso de railway=station a railway=yard.
No sé si me convence este cambio. Porque yard?
Porque no disused:railway=station?
Discutiste este cambio en algún lugar? Porque se aconseja discutir ediciones de este tamaño antes de hacerlas…
Abrazo, Geogast
gunnar1m (2024-05-02 09:10:31+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Dyard
Geogast (2024-05-14 00:13:27+00:00): Yo sé lo que significa railway=yard. Pero dudo que las estaciones en desuso sean todas railway=yard (y no disused:railway=station). Lo otro: una edicíon en masa necesita ser discutida antes.
Hufkratzer (2024-04-13 00:17:48+00:00): Hi,
This area does not look like a riding centre, it looks like an area with some paddocks. The tag leisure=horse_riding (riding centre) is not appropriate for such an area, it is for the whole riding centre, in this case for https://www.manegehillegom.nl. This riding centre can be mapped like https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2731269675. See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dhorse_riding
Ken Woods (2024-04-13 12:11:59+00:00): OK, you didn't look at the aerial photo, eh?
Hufkratzer (2024-04-13 19:25:06+00:00): Sorry, I don't understand this question. I looked at at PDOK, Bing, Google and the website. On https://www.manegehillegom.nl/manege/#openingstijden you can read about this area: "Paddock
De speeltuin van de paarden, hier mogen de paarden even rollen en vrij bewegen. Iedereen mag zijn of haar paard in de paddock zetten. De paarden kunnen gescheiden worden met schriklint maar ze mogen ook bij elkaar geplaatst worden. De afmeting is 70m x 28m."
Ken Woods (2024-04-13 21:12:31+00:00): OK.
sabas88 (2024-04-12 10:35:45+00:00): Se è abbandonato ma esiste ancora ha senso lasciarlo e cambiarci i tag piuttosto che rimuoverlo
kapazao (2024-04-17 08:38:28+00:00): Hola, por favor ten en cuenta que los enlaces de carretera deben ser lo más cortos posibles e ir lo más próximos a la bifurcación que tienen. En algunos casos veo que los haces más largos cuando ya estaban correctamente.
Aquí puedes ver un ejemplo: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Motorway_link_example.png
Un saludo
K_Sakanoshita (2024-06-06 13:40:17+00:00): 初めまして。OpenStreetMap Foundation Japanの坂ノ下と申します。

長居運動場あたりの森林ですが、丸が重ねて描かれており、実態を表していないように見受けられます。

OpenStreetMapのベストプラクティスとして「レンダラー（見た目）のためにタグ付けをしてはいけない」というのがあります。

もし、見た目を目的としたマッピングをされているのであれば、お手数ですが実態に即した形にして頂けますでしょうか。

また、そういう意図で無ければ、お考えをお聞かせ頂けたらと思います。

お手数ですが、ご返答をお待ちしています。

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:%E3%83%AC%E3%83%B3%E3%83%80%E3%83%A9%E3%83%BC%E3%81%AE%E3%81%9F%E3%82%81%E3%81%AE%E3%82%BF%E3%82%B0%E4%BB%98%E3%81%91
H_OK (2024-06-07 03:37:51+00:00): OpenStreetMap Foundation Japan 坂ノ下　様

はじめまして。H_OK と申します。

ご連絡ありがとうございます。

以下、インラインにて失礼いたします。

＞　OpenStreetMapのベストプラクティスとして
＞　「レンダラー（見た目）のためにタグ付けをしてはいけない」というのがあります。

上記、大変勉強になりました。
また、地図は現実世界の地物を抽象化、記号化したものである、
ということは重々理解をしているつもりです。

＞　長居運動場あたりの森林ですが、丸が重ねて描かれており、
＞　実態を表していないように見受けられます。

自宅が長居公園まで道を挟んで徒歩１分で、
建物の９階なので公園を一望できます。
また、実際に週に何度も現場に行きますので、
個人的には実態を表していると考えます。

長居公園の樹木は人工林で、とても大きなものや小さなものまで
１本１本丁寧に手入れされております。

丸（樹木：人工林）を多数重ねて描画していることが
良くないとのご指摘でしょうか。
のっぺりした区画で森林を描画する方が
地図の目的として正しいということでしょうか。

確かに鬼のように丸（樹木：人工林）を書き込みしています。
他の似たような公園でもあまり見かけない描き方かとは思います。
（なくもないですが：https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/33.58839/130.35044）

具体的に、上記のように丸を重ねるのではなく、
区画で描画するようにした方が妥当でしょうか。
そうであれば、そのように更新をするようにいたします。

お忙しいところ恐縮ですが、
ご教示をいただけますと幸いです。
K_Sakanoshita (2024-06-07 14:21:09+00:00): H_OK様

ご返信ありがとうございます。坂ノ下です。
私の方もインラインにて返答させて頂きます。

> 丸（樹木：人工林）を多数重ねて描画していることが良くないとのご指摘でしょうか。 

もし、この丸が1本の樹木を意味しているなら、以下の点を見直して頂けますでしょうか。

・樹木はノードで描く必要があります
   https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Tag:natural%3Dtree
   ※幹の直径はdiameter_crownへ

なお、人工林（landuse=forest）の主タグはlanduseとなり、「土地利用」を意味します。

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Key:landuse

そのため、1本の樹木を表現するタグでは無いとお考えください（そのエリアが何に利用されているかという視点です）。

> のっぺりした区画で森林を描画する方が地図の目的として正しいということでしょうか。

「のっぺりとした区画」が定規で描いた様な直線的な表現を意味するなら、のっぺりしなくても良いと思います。

人工林もそうですが、海岸線や川の岸辺など、時間帯や季節で大きく変化するものがあるので、そこはご自身の感覚でエリアの形をマッピングして頂けたらと私は考えます。

ただ、一部の丸は公園を超えて道路にはみ出ていることと、重なっている人工林は一つのエリアにまとめて頂けたらと思います。

また、教えて頂いた福岡市の公園も見直しが必要と考えます（丸の重なりが無いので、修正は樹木だけですみそうです）。

最後に、これだけの量をマッピングしてくださった熱量に感謝しています。

のっぺりと塗りつぶすのではなく、丸が重複したエリアを結合しつつ、樹木の幹がある所にノード（natural=tree）を書くことで、長居公園の植生を記録し、将来に伝えていく一次資料にもなれれば幸いです。

以上、よろしくお願いします。
nabetaro (2024-06-08 01:27:42+00:00): たくさんのマッピングお疲れ様です。
K_Sakanoshita さんを補足だけです。

> ※幹の直径はdiameter_crownへ

書き間違いだと思いますが、diameter_crownは樹冠の直径です。
(木の枝の広がった部分)
なので、1本の木を表現するのに都合が良いかと思います。
K_Sakanoshita (2024-06-08 01:52:55+00:00): ご指摘ありがとうございます。
私の認識が間違えていました。申し訳ありません。

あと、アップロードされる時のコメントをもう少し丁寧にして頂けると他のマッパーからも何をしたか分かりやすくなるので、ご検討頂けると幸いです（具体的には、「どこの何をどうしたか」をざっくりと）。
H_OK (2024-06-09 06:07:14+00:00): みなさま
H_OK でございます。
技術的なご支援をいただき、誠にありがとうございます。
大変参考になります。

修正等、引き続き継続しようと思います。
ありがとうございます。
Pol Dellaiera (2024-04-15 11:53:46+00:00): Could you please avoid committing things without adding a comment? I think this was already asked to you in the past.
Mb_651 (2024-04-16 20:49:41+00:00): Ja, denke schon, obwohl hier auch ofters Flugschauen stattfanden müsste es ein Segelfluggelände sein
osmviborg (2024-04-12 10:43:22+00:00): Husk at forbinde dine stier til det øvrige vejnet. Jeg har tilsluttet din sti til Aikevej.
Frans S (2024-04-12 11:15:26+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149903607
aceman444 (2024-10-02 22:45:31+00:00): Zdravim, ako viete, ze je to parkovisko len pre zakaznikov? A zakaznikov akeho podniku? Vyzera to byt pod obytnymi domami. Tabula s pocnom volnych miest je vypnuta, tak mozno uz je to len sukromne (pre obyvatelov).
aceman444 (2024-10-02 22:45:57+00:00): Aha a ake "streetlevel imagery" ste pouzili?
michel60 (2024-04-14 05:35:44+00:00): Bonjour,
La ligne 10 du metro est passé en erreur de continuité.
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3328740#map=17/48.84645/2.25843
On peut voir cette erreur avec GEOFABRIK OSMInspector avec le lien suivant:
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=2.27275&lat=48.84430&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.94&overlays=ptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid
Ligne en voir -> ligne en erreur
Je ne pense pas qu'il faille le décrire mais il se dit sur les forum de mettre seulement le trajet préférentiel ...
Cordialement Michel
michel60 (2024-04-14 05:38:28+00:00): La seulr solution possible est de mettre deux trajets différents dans le route_master avec les noms variante1 et variante2 : mais ça apporte quoi si les deux variantes ont les mêmes arrêts ?
Cordialement Michel
michel60 (2024-04-14 06:02:42+00:00): Si l'une des voies est pour un sens et l'autre pour l'autre, alors il faut inclure la voie uniquement dans le bon sens de circulation.
Cordialement Michel
michel60 (2024-04-14 06:06:12+00:00): Le wiki a une page pour le métro de paris:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/M%C3%A9tro_de_Paris
Les liens "Voir" permmetent la visualisation graphique de chaque ligne et des erreurs Osmose éventuelles
michel60 (2024-04-14 06:11:30+00:00): Re,
A ce jour, 
- GEOFABRIK OSM Inspector donne l'erreur "gap" car la ligne n'est pas un seul trajet dans chaque sens (cliquer sur le ligne en noir pour visualiser l'erreur).
- Et dans le wiki (lien "Voir"), certains arrêts ne sont pas nommés et ne sont pas dans le bon ordre.
Bon courage. Michel
gscholz (2024-04-23 06:39:26+00:00): 

Hi Grannymeg,
your recent edits have left behind a big amount of errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-35.77814&lat=-8.23598&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
CupIvan (2024-04-22 18:01:44+00:00): здравствуйте! пожалуйста, внимательно рисуйте линии, у вас некоторые точки приклеиваются к уже нарисованным, если объект стоит отдельно - проверяйте, чтобы его точки были отделены от других
также можете воспользоваться редактором JOSM для более точного рисования и перед сохранением он подсказывает если есть какие-либо ошибки в данных
jcr83 (2024-04-18 21:36:28+00:00): Bonjour,
Pouvez-vous expliquer ce que vous avez mis en sens unique ? Il n'y a aucun chemin dans vos modifications !
akimapbuilder (2024-04-12 11:36:24+00:00): Hi! For waterbodies, please use natural=water instead of building=yes. Thanks!
Frans S (2024-04-12 11:31:41+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
No buildings squared !
Map more accurate by following the rooflines (extensions of buildings or corners)

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149905821
akimapbuilder (2024-04-12 11:38:11+00:00): Hi! When adding building, try to follow building footprints and match the geometry.
Frans S (2024-04-12 11:34:56+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. However, do not include the shadow line of a building in your mapping

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149905882
Frans S (2024-04-12 11:35:14+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149905883
Frans S (2024-04-12 11:33:49+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149905900
akimapbuilder (2024-04-12 11:55:27+00:00): You can tag area of farm with landuse=farmland.
Frans S (2024-04-16 11:37:58+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping. Rather precise mapped, however, please pay more attention to details like complex rooflines.
See this page, left bottom (example) 
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=150080546
 And, a shadow line shows the whole length of a building. Map it accordingly.
Best regards
Frans S (2024-04-12 12:27:31+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Mapped objects not tagged as building=yes.
Buildings not squared.
2 Buildings combined  to 1 building


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149906667
mavl (2024-04-12 14:17:15+00:00): Здравствуйте. Напишите, пожалуйста, почему удалено слово "озеро" из названия?  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/680891051
ZinaidaZ (2024-04-12 14:38:57+00:00): Добрый день. Руководствовалась тем, что тип объекта «озеро» можно обозначить тегом water=lake, а в name оставила только название.
mavl (2024-04-12 15:19:17+00:00): Вы правы water=lake - это озеро, но название может быть не связано с типом водоёма. Озеро может называться "Лагуна Ариштол", "Старица Ариштол", "Пруд Ариштол" и тому подобное. Это как у улицами. Вроде это улица (тип объекта), а называется "переулок Пушкина". Например, на этой странице рекомендуется указывать слово "озеро" (и другие родовые слова) для озёр:  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9A%D0%B0%D0%BA_%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%BE%D0%B7%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%87%D0%B8%D1%82%D1%8C
ZinaidaZ (2024-04-12 15:57:40+00:00): Тем не менее Байкал или Иссык-Куль без «озера», но ок, верну «озеро» в name
mavl (2024-04-12 16:40:04+00:00): Разумеется, есть названия без уточнений (родовых слов).  
Спасибо.
Frans S (2024-04-12 12:23:26+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149906707
Syl (2024-04-13 14:05:45+00:00): Bonjour, les portails ne seraient pas plutôt d'accès privé comme la route ?
hms35 (2024-04-13 14:35:01+00:00): En réalité l'accès privé (copropriété) est lié à la présence de portails à sonnettes/digicodes
Syl (2024-04-13 17:41:31+00:00): Mais pourquoi les portails ne sont pas marqués à accès privé ?
hms35 (2024-04-13 19:46:56+00:00): c'est subtil on accède physiquement aux portails même si on ne peut pas les franchir. ça me semble être implicitement le cas de tout les portails, mais je peux évidemment marquer ceux-ci comme privés, pas de souci.
Frans S (2024-04-14 15:27:07+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Inaccurate mapped.
Clustered buildings.
Buildings not squared.


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149906900
akimapbuilder (2024-04-12 12:43:47+00:00): Try to match building geometry from satellite imagery.  Thanks!
Frans S (2024-04-12 12:22:48+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149906987
Frans S (2024-04-12 12:20:23+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. Please do not map outside the scope of a project. Stay within the task.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149906989
Frans S (2024-04-12 12:18:34+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149907042
Frans S (2024-04-12 12:16:12+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149907254
Frans S (2024-04-12 12:15:04+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. However, don't include the shadow line into a mapping.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149907255
gurglypipe (2024-04-12 12:13:14+00:00): Hiya, what were you trying to change here? You’ve deleted and re-created the station node (with a slightly different name), and by doing so have lost all the contribution history, and the wikidata tagging, on that node.
gurglypipe (2024-04-12 13:27:37+00:00): I’ve restored the station node’s history in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149910853, while trying to retain your other changes from this changeset.
tyr_asd (2024-04-12 12:17:39+00:00): Sorry, this changeset should have actually been made with my main account (i.e. this one).
Frans S (2024-04-12 12:13:56+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149907450
Frans S (2024-04-12 12:12:57+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149907456