piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
silversurfer83 (2026-03-23 19:52:26+00:00): Hi :)

Kleiner Hinweis: Wenn ich mich recht erinnere ist es OK in einer Baumreihe die Bäume als einzelne Punkte zu erfassen. Also einfach die Baumreihe zeichnen und an jedem Baumstandort einen Punkt (node) setzen welcher dann auch als einzelner Baum getaggt werden kann.

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180313375
Fjana (2026-03-25 11:44:38+00:00): See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edits/Fjana/add_border_type_to_boundaries_in_Czechia
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-17 01:39:52+00:00): Reverted adding POI with explicit source=* of Google Maps, which is not allowed by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ), in changeset 184205083

https://osm.org/changeset/184205083
Fjana (2026-03-25 11:44:41+00:00): See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edits/Fjana/add_border_type_to_boundaries_in_Czechia
Fjana (2026-03-25 11:44:35+00:00): See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edits/Fjana/add_border_type_to_boundaries_in_Czechia
aceman444 (2026-04-15 20:26:28+00:00): Zdravim, dakujem za pridanie parkovisk a oznacenie, ktore su v PAAS. Naozaj su ale na ulici Havelkova take jednotlive osamotene parkovacie miesta?
aceman444 (2026-04-15 20:43:40+00:00): Oznacil som parkoviska prislusnymi znackami, lebo v 'description' tomu ziadna aplikacia nebude rozumiet.
Tie tabulky inde v meste neznacime, ale ak ich chcete tak kludne. Len 'operator' nema byt PAAS (to nie je firma). PAAS davam do brand, a v operatorovi je Hlavne mesto SR ... Pozrite tie parkoviska.
Neurobil som zatial vsetky ale na zaciatok zapadnu cast.

A ako sa da na tych parkoviskach platit v hotovosti, ked ste to tak oznacili?
aceman444 (2026-04-15 20:49:49+00:00): Teda existuje aj firma PAAS, s.r.o. (https://paas.sk/spolocnost/o-nas/ ), ale neviem ci ta pokryva vsetky parkoviska PAAS a ktore presne.
Pavol33 (2026-04-16 10:23:50+00:00): Ahoj, ano tak ako som to tam dal, tak to pokryva firma paas
Pavol33 (2026-04-16 10:24:56+00:00): všetky parkovacie miesta su tak ako som ich zaznacil. Konkretne si ich viete pozriet pomocou mojich fotiek na mapy.com
aceman444 (2026-04-16 16:17:05+00:00): No neviem, napr. niekde sa cislo useku 4201 lisi od toho ako to ma na mape paas.sk. Pozriem si teda fotky.
Ale normalne sa v PAAS neda platit v hotovosti. Tie fotky skusim pozriet, uvidim to tam niekde?

Inak prave o PAAS diskutujeme na fore ako tie parkoviska znacit, ak sa chcete pridat je to na https://groups.google.com/g/osm_sk/c/CzurYS4k4Jw .
aceman444 (2026-04-16 16:19:36+00:00): Na mapy.com som fotky tabuliek PAAS nenasiel. Viete dal linku s nejakym prikladom?
Pavol33 (2026-04-16 18:23:57+00:00): Parkovanie rezidenti, parkovanie návštevnici
Bratislava - Lamač, Slowakei
Parkovanie rezidenti, parkovanie návštevnici
Bratislava - Lamač, Slowakei
Pavol33 (2026-04-16 18:24:41+00:00): Twn link mi sem nevlozi. Pozri si v okoli Malokarpatske namestia. Tam su vsade fotky v mapy.com
aceman444 (2026-04-22 18:45:58+00:00): Dakujem, podla toho nazvu sa dali fotky vyhladat. Nedozvedel som sa, ako sa da platit v hotovosti (jedine mozno v obchodoch, kde sa PAAS da zaplatit). V automatoch je len kartou a na parkoviskach cez sms ci apku.
Ale cisla usekov je na nich vidiet, a teda nie vsade je 4201 ako ste uviedli v poznamkach. Poopravujem to.
Pavol33 (2026-04-23 10:51:31+00:00): Ďakujem ti
rempshaener (2026-03-23 21:32:59+00:00): Hallo,
welchen Hintergrund hat denn das ford=yes? Vermutlich verklickt?
Viele Grüße
Michi_10 (2026-03-24 16:17:10+00:00): Hi,
ja, ich habe mich beim bearbeiten der Geometrien des Ways in den Eigenschaftem versehentlich verklickt. Ich habe es nun korrigiert.
Viele Grüße und einen schönen Tag noch
Dawid2849 (2026-03-23 17:00:10+00:00): Witam w OSM i dzięki za edycję :)
Trochę poprawiłem geometrię tej ścieżki na podstawie BDOT500 - jednej z warstw dostępnej na Geoportalu Krajowym. Mam kilka pytań co do niej - jaka nawierzchnia na niej jest? Paved to dość ogólna wartość i zaleca się korzystanie z bardziej dokładnych wartości. Czy są tam znaki C13/16? Jeśli nie, to nie stosujemy foot=designated + bicycle=designated.

Pozdrawiam,
Dawid
degemian (2026-03-23 18:01:42+00:00): Witam, odpowiadając na Twoje pytania nawierzchnia jest z wykonana z kruszywa. Jako takiego znaku C13/16 nie ma ale są piktogramy z pieszym i rowerzystą.
Dawid2849 (2026-03-25 16:39:56+00:00): Jakie dokładnie to kruszywo? W OSM wyróżniamy kilka znaczników dla dróg tego typu: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:surface#Unpaved
Dawid2849 (2026-03-25 16:40:29+00:00): Oraz jaka nawierzchnia jest na moście?
degemian (2026-03-25 17:08:05+00:00): Mostek jest wykonany z drewna, zaś pozostała część z https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface%3Dfine_gravel
MappingMore (2026-03-28 09:01:18+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:180533246
iandees (2026-03-23 17:28:01+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3625763329 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180316796, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:06:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 08:58:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:09:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:13:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
iandees (2026-03-23 17:28:07+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1294034248 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180316801, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
NeisBot (2026-03-23 16:54:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13297150257 v6

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Property management office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisAgent (2026-03-23 23:33:26+00:00): 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again?
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-05 07:54:17+00:00): Cleaned up remaining SEO spam and other mistagging for POI in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/185127095
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:07:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
eggie (2026-03-23 19:26:01+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Dawid2849 (2026-03-23 17:15:03+00:00): Miało być: poprawa kierunku rowu
NeisBot (2026-03-23 17:21:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13671926702 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Roofing contractor office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-03-31 22:33:03+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/180682566
Piskvor (2026-03-24 09:27:01+00:00): Hello, thanks for trying to improve the map.

SJM/5.května no longer trunk road? Accessible to all traffic, including foot and bicycle??? Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Moreover, it was still signed as trunk road OTG, as of 2026-03-22 (road sign IZ2a).

We map what actually exists on the ground - whether we like it or not. What we would like the world to be, or what it's supposed to be on paper, is something quite different. Nominating all your changes for revert. 

That said, I can understand the logic behind these changes; but such major updates should come from a) major changes IRL, such as 5.kvetna and K Barrandovu actually being downgraded, or b) after some discussion (talk-cz mailing list, chat at osmap.cz )

Best regards,
Piskvor
Piskvor (2026-03-25 12:06:02+00:00): After a discussion at the mailing list, I have conceded that your edits are correct - I'll go and review them, as there are some minor ways still marked primary (e. g. Wilsonova). Also, the bit of 5.května from Jižní spojka to Pankrác is signed as trunk road. 

Other than that, thank you for the effort.
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:10:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
iandees (2026-03-23 23:21:04+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1252523254 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180329460, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
LakePoopó (2026-03-25 09:53:38+00:00): Hello iandees! Thank you for your input. Happy mapping!
mueschel (2026-03-23 18:52:16+00:00): There are again issues with this import. 

There is no "roof:shape=gable" or "roof:colour=Black"

There are duplicated buildings like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1491916932

There are duplicated addresses like
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5804986497

This import really needs a proper preparation!
mueschel (2026-03-23 18:54:41+00:00): And there are buildings missing which have been there before, e.g. near 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/549797211
M-NCPPC_Import (2026-03-24 12:34:56+00:00): Thank you again for your feedback. I will revert and address these issues.
ajmat (2026-03-24 06:23:47+00:00): Reverted in changeset id: 180336417
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-25 06:55:37+00:00): Why?
LordGarySugar (2026-03-27 01:45:47+00:00): Hey, thanks for adding these buildings and housenumbers! 

Some tips for mapping houses:
- each house in a terrace should be traced individually, similarly semidetached houses should be two connected buildings. You can enable 'OSMUK cadastral parcels' in background settings to highlight property boundaries and make this easier.
- use Q to square buildings, this will make them more accurate and will look better

Thanks for contributing, if you have any questions feel free to ask!
Tom of Essex (2026-04-22 02:10:16+00:00): Hi, I apologise, only now have I found where the messages are from a month ago. Firstly, I had no idea about the cadastral parcels bit, that will make A LOT of difference. Many thanks for that. Also, good to note about the Q bit, I'll do that from hereon. If you need me to redo what I've done so far, let me know. Thanks for your patience.
LordGarySugar (2026-04-24 02:35:43+00:00): There's no rush to redo anything, but ideally the terraces you've mapped would be redone as individual houses to match other parts of Chelmsford. Buildings are quite time consuming to trace, so if you'd like any help in the area let me know :)
NeisBot (2026-03-23 17:39:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13672341386 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Peluquería Aveda"
---
Por ejemplo, una versión más neutral y objetiva de tu texto podría ser: "Peluquería Aveda"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-03-31 22:33:07+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/180317798
eggie (2026-03-23 19:28:20+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback. In OSM Nederland werken we met import adresnodes. Dus een adres toevoegen aan een gebouw is dubbelop. Ik heb het adres verwijderd. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
NeisBot (2026-03-23 17:51:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13672341386 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Peluquería Aveda"
---
Por ejemplo, una versión más neutral y objetiva de tu texto podría ser: "Peluquería Aveda"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-31 22:33:09+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180694670
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:10:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
mueschel (2026-03-28 11:54:26+00:00): Hi,
could you check this node? Something went wrong with the postal code:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1156196629
apires (2026-03-30 08:54:08+00:00): Corrected, thank you.
NeisBot (2026-03-23 17:57:41+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 15 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1491926431 v1 | 5 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1377590676 v12 | 6 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180318074
NeisReview (2026-03-31 22:33:15+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/180318682
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 08:59:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:13:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 08:59:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
NeisBot (2026-03-23 18:15:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 8 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1491933973 v1 | 8 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180318904
rajdhani (2026-03-25 05:07:29+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:180385898
hatul (2026-05-20 12:16:44+00:00): שלום,
מחקת בטעות את היחס של שביל ישראל בקטע הבא. בבקשה להיזהר. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/26590554
NeisBot (2026-03-23 18:36:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 19 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/930520278 v3 | 10 crossings
https://osm.org/way/836278742 v1 | 9 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/7805467607 v3

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180320016
NeisReview (2026-03-31 22:33:16+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/180610942
ajmat (2026-03-24 11:19:55+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:180348335
Frans S (2026-04-14 08:49:49+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please do not map trees as being a building. It is clear that these objects are not buildings. Green. buildings are mostly brownish/gray.
You marked the task as unavailable. This option is to be used when the task is (mainly) clouded.
I removed the mappings.
Best regards and keep mapping
Le Petit Léo (2026-03-23 19:25:03+00:00): Bonjour,
Je vois que vous vous appliquez à ajouter la clé access=no sur certains chemin. Mais il me semble que la bonne clé serait plutôt access=private.
Je vous invite à consulter la page : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:access%3Dprivate
Vous pouvez aussi vous appuyer sur le forum : https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/
Bonne cartographie
NeisBot (2026-03-23 18:54:39+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 10 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1212523714 v2 | 7 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/11233772556 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180320669
NeisReview (2026-03-31 22:33:16+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/180344934
IpswichEdits (2026-03-23 21:17:56+00:00): Thanks for spotting my typo!
rarad74 (2026-03-23 20:40:47+00:00): Hi, Please pay attention because Bing Maps from Bucharest are older than 10 years and are not centered too well. MApbox is the newest  ( 1-2 years old)and is centered well. ESRI standard is also good and much recent than Bing.
cheatach (2026-03-24 20:58:07+00:00): Można rysować trawę na terenach mieszkalnych ale usuwanie potem tych drugich jest błędem. Usunąłeś tak już kilka obszarów niszcząc czyjąś pracę, proszę teraz je przywrócić. Ponadto tutaj https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1053833109 zdublowałeś tagi, które już były w tym budynku jako węzeł.
grzegorz75jan (2026-03-24 21:47:51+00:00): Myślisz, że przywróci ?
Gość ma raptem 9 edycji. nawet jeżeli przywróci jakimś cudem to na pewno bez zachowania historii.
Damian3456 (2026-03-25 08:22:34+00:00): Nie do końca rozumiem, dlaczego należy zostawiać teren mieszkalny, skoro po nałożeniu ogrodu nie jest widoczny na mapie. Mogę go przywrócić, tylko nie bardzo rozumiem po co, jeśli go nie widać? W większości wsi nie ma go w ogóle.
Jeśli chodzi o tagi to masz na myśli punkt na budynku? Sprecyzuj proszę.
cheatach (2026-03-26 02:59:29+00:00): Bo ten ogród leży na terenie mieszkalnym. Wiele rzeczy nie widać w podstawowym widoku mapy ale widać w innych, korzystają z nich routingi i inni ludzie. We wsiach nie ma to można zmapować lub jako farmyard. W praktycznie każdej większej miejscowości są, nie mówiąc już o miastach. Tagi np. kliniki daje się na obrysie budynku lub jako punkt w budynku, nigdy to i to jednocześnie bo wtedy wychodzi klinika w w klinice.
Damian3456 (2026-03-26 16:06:14+00:00): Dodane
NeisBot (2026-03-23 19:24:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/3922287613 v8

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Mexican restaurant"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-31 22:33:14+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180694671
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
NeisBot (2026-03-23 19:30:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/12450535119 v5

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Heating and cooling contractor"

#MapWithoutSpam
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-05 07:51:23+00:00): Cleaned up remaining SEO spam and other mistagging for POI in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/185127023