piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:24:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:24:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:25:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:26:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:22:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:22:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:25:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
CurlingMan13 (2024-04-09 18:24:01+00:00): Do not partially overlap areas.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:23:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
silversurfer83 (2024-04-03 22:01:40+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap :)

danke, dass du hilfst die Karte aktuell zu halten.

Du hast darum gebeten, dass sich jemande diese Änderung ansieht. Ich mach das mal.

Vom Luftbild zu urteilen sieht das alles gut aus. Kannst du so machen und auch erstmal so lassen.

Wenn du den Spielplatz gerne genauer erfassen möchtest gibt es da viele Möglichkeiten und im Wiki ist einiges davon erklärt:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:playground#Kletterger%C3%A4te

Bei Fragen immer raus damit und ansonsten weiter viel Spaß an der Karte
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149544865
Xevi (2025-02-21 22:27:24+00:00): In this changeset you changed the field denomination of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/256898929#map=19/37.609207/-0.980594 from "latter-day_saints" to "mormon". Even the name "mormon" is widely used this name is confusing because referes to a group of diferent religions, see https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Movimiento_de_los_Santos_de_los_%C3%9Altimos_D%C3%ADas#Mormonismo , see also https://noticias-es.laiglesiadejesucristo.org/gu%C3%ADa-de-estilo
Max McCarthy (2024-04-03 22:16:32+00:00): Re-aligned the building
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:23:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
matarranyacorrector (2024-04-03 22:31:24+00:00): Hola franjaragon,

Debes mantener el historial de los nodos como éste. ¿Cómo? No eliminando el nodo y, por tanto, modificar las etiquetas para que se trate de un pico y resituarlo en su lugar correcto. No hacerlo se considera una mala práctica.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:26:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:23:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:26:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:25:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-05-22 21:50:03+00:00): Access tag refers to who can physically access a feature. Not ownership. access=permissive is the correct tag. barriers should be tagged access=private and the connection shouldn't be removed
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149545880
bxl-forever (2024-04-04 00:42:42+00:00): Hello,
Again, this restaurant is already on the map.  Please stop uploading duplicate values into the database.
Reverted.
trapicki (2024-07-04 11:32:08+00:00): Das Ding über den Mühlgang südlich der Brücke der Schrödignerstraße ist kein Wehr, das ist nur ein Träger für ein Rohr. Ich werd's entfernen.
PerpetualHiker (2024-04-03 23:25:08+00:00): Correction: Source used was Maxar SecureWatch Imagery 2024-03-31.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:24:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:26:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:23:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:22:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:25:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
el_emka (2024-04-04 14:47:11+00:00): Dieser Anbau wurde seinerzeit von Enterprise für die Innenreinigung und Nachtabstellung einiger Leihwagen verwendet. Jetzt gehören die Räumlichkeiten zum hier eingezogenen Kfz-Sachverständigen-Büro und haben immer noch das große Einfahrtstor.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:25:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
GovernorKeagan (2024-04-04 00:55:26+00:00): Looks like we both made changes at the same time which has led to some duplicate buildings lol.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149545940#map=14/45.5078/-100.0318

I’ll have a look in the morning at removing some of them (couple hours from now).
5R-MFT (2024-04-04 07:32:22+00:00): Hello,
then we were both working in the same area.  I usually check my edits again after an hour.  Yesterday I had already removed some according to the following system.
A) If I see duplicate edits I delete mine to avoid conflicts. 
B) I delete the others if mine have more information, for example roof shape, websites, phone numbers, wiki links etc.
Then I will wait so we don't delete at the same time.
GovernorKeagan (2024-04-04 08:39:20+00:00): I’m only on mobile now but it looks like you have deleted most if not all of the duplicates already, thank you.

I will check again later today again and see if JOSM picks up on anything else.
GovernorKeagan (2024-04-04 11:41:25+00:00): All of the duplicates should now be deleted. I kept anything that was more accurately mapped or had more details added.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149566160
VLD549 (2024-05-01 05:52:49+00:00): Hi, could you provide a link where the name addition 'Nord' is mentioned? The link provided doesn't show it and I can't seem to verify it online otherwise.

Thank you in advance!
el_emka (2024-04-04 14:40:56+00:00): Ahoi, warum hast du hier die Hausnummer wieder weggenommen? Die steht vielleicht nicht in ALKIS aber sie steht am Gebäude.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-06 05:41:02+00:00): Hello!

Note that you do not need to add description of feature type as a name.
For example when mapping tree it is enough to specify that it is a tree, no need for putting that name of this specific tree is "Tree".

So for buildings it is not needed to put House as their name.

Or do you maybe know that this specific object mapped at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1266221888 is specifically named with such name?

And if it was mistake - can you edit map to remove this name?
    
Do not worry too much about this issue - I made way worse mistakes when I was starting. Maybe some tool or explanation is confusing? Why you added this name? Note that I am asking as maybe something can be fixed to be less confusing.
CurlingMan13 (2024-04-04 00:51:12+00:00): ...dude...

Again, I have merged your areas to be a large area and multipolygon as I have stated many times before...
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149547829
eggie (2024-04-04 06:17:28+00:00): Beste Padvinder.. Heb je nu gecheckt of de polygonen zijn gesloten. Ik zie landuse verdwijnen op verschillende plaatsen. Waarom water over bos gemapt zonder het te scheiden?
Is het wel verstandig om landuse en water in zo'n kwetsbaar gebied met GoMap te bewerken?
Dat kan beter met Josm.
Wat bedoel je met Details omg .....  Dat zegt toch niemand wat.
Mvg
eggie
marczoutendijk (2024-04-04 08:22:28+00:00): Beste Padvinder,
Begrijp je de vragen van eggie die hierboven gesteld worden?
Op het forum liggen ook flink wat vragen voor je klaar. Zou je daar een keer willen gaan lezen?
Het is hier te vinden:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/wat-is-mapper-padvinder-aan-het-doen/111233/20

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
padvinder (2024-04-04 14:29:54+00:00): ja Eggie, work in progress. Je zit er dicht bovenop! Dank voor je oplettendheid. bomen in het water is inderdaad niet mooi en die witte vlakken. Dat gebeurt af en toe. en als ik dan terug kom corrigeer ik het, zoals heel OSM van correcties en verbeteringen aan elkaar hangt. Er mogen af en toe in het werk nieuwe fouten en terkortkomingen bij komen, maar al met al wordt OSM al corrigerend en verbeterend steeds mooier en beter. En GoMap vind ik een lekkere editor. Met die andere kreeg ik problemen bij de installatie.
eggie (2024-04-04 15:02:07+00:00): Dag Padvinder..

Alleerst bedankt voor je reactie.
Mijn advies zou zijn om kleinere stukken aan te pakken. Dan zie je sneller waar het 'verkeerd'  is gegaan.
Met Josm zijn inderdaad soms problemen. De webversie doet het bij mij ook niet meer... maar de downloadversie is vast wel aan de praat te krijgen. Vraag anders advies op het forum. 
Josm heeft een goede validator en dan haal je onvolkomenheden er zo uit.
Loop svp eerst je laatste edits na. Beetje in en uitzoomen..dan zie je ook waar de lege plekken ztten.
Het is m.i. toch echt nodig om voor kwaliteit te gaan en niet de kwantiteit. 
Er gaat gelukkig in osm meer goed dan fout.. maar toch... door de massaliteit van je edits liggen je aanpassingen onder een vergrootglas.
De osm community legt nu eenmaal de lat hoog.
Fijne dag..
eggie
marczoutendijk (2024-04-05 07:45:05+00:00): Hallo Padvinder,

Kijk je ook nog een keer op het forum om te zien welke andere merkwaardige "verbeteringen" je allemaal aan OSM toevoegt en waar anderen commentaar op geven?
Nogmaals het adres:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/wat-is-mapper-padvinder-aan-het-doen/111233/25
DressyPear4 (2024-04-04 21:55:08+00:00): Olá, evite usar caixa alta
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149548448
Sruby (2024-04-04 03:00:05+00:00): There is no trail here and people have come exploring overgrown private property to find one based on this outdated map. Delete this, please.
Blixt99 (2024-04-04 22:25:20+00:00): Greens in OSM are "dominant" over fairways. To accurately represent the transition from fairway to green the splining of the fairway must go under the "dominant" green, in most cases for par 4's and par 5's. Doing it this way means the mown fairway comes right up to the fringe of the green so that balls, if hit short, can still roll up onto the green. If the fairway is kept short of the green than a patch of rough will be left between the end of the fairway and the green, which does not represent reality. Besides trying to represent reality I am also doing this in order to accurately transfer the course data into the golf course game designer I am using to recreate the course in the virtual world so that it can be played in the game by anyone who owns the game. I have played this course for many decades but can no longer play the real game, so recreating it in the game enables me to play it on my computer. What harm is being done by overlapping the green and fairway in OSM? How are you the judge and jury here? Do you really think anyone cares if there is a slight overlap of green and fairway, other then you? Please explain. I've done this same editing on other courses that I've played and had no complaints, so what gives?
CurlingMan13 (2024-04-04 22:38:32+00:00): As stated before, there are errors that are thrown when you map areas with partial overlap. The database and most renderers are unable to figure out which is on "top" when they partially overlap. People do care and they do notice. It may not be right away, but it happens, especially when focused on resolving errors and ensuring a high quality map.

It is clear you are mapping for the renderer. There are many services that rely on OSM data, beyond just a little golf game, and it is important that the data follow certain guidelines to ensure consistency across all those swrvices.

There is no golf course where the fairway and greens co-exist in the same space. They touch, yes, but there is no small area (or corners) of the green where there is a fairway somehow underneath and coexisting in the same space.

I continue to remind people mapping golf courses to review this page on golf tags, especially the section on common pitfalls to avoid.  Specifically, you are mapping partial overlaps, which is very explicit and even has a photo!

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#:~:text=Overlapping%20green/fairway/rough%20polygons%20(see%20graphic%20below).

Further, problematic mappers who repeatedly map in poor quality with errors are documented and handled by the DWG:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Problematic_mapping/golf
Blixt99 (2024-04-04 23:15:37+00:00): Point taken. Sorry. I will no longer overlap greens and fairways in OSM. The OSM wiki article was helpful and so were forum answers in my game designer. Thanks.
tekim (2024-04-06 00:43:29+00:00): Reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149636898
tekim (2024-04-06 00:43:54+00:00): Reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149636905
tekim (2024-04-06 00:41:51+00:00): Reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149636878
tekim (2024-04-06 00:40:54+00:00): Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap, otherwise known as OSM!  It is great to have you as part of our community.  Thanks for your edits to the map, and for providing a changeset comment - that is important.  Unfortunately, when editing OSM we cannot use Google Maps due to Google's terms of use.   

Also, names in OSM should not be abbreviated.
tekim (2024-04-06 00:41:15+00:00): Reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149636870
TheDutchMan13 (2024-04-04 21:56:33+00:00): Google maps can't be used as source for road names or any other info
tekim (2024-04-06 00:46:46+00:00): Reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149636947
Hufkratzer (2024-04-05 21:07:21+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1268882630 ist ein Reitplatz und keine Reitanlage. Er gehört wahrscheinlich zu dem Reiterhof https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2290527705.
Reitplätze werden  in OSM normalerweise mit leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian getaggt, und dafür gib's in iD ein Preset mit dem Namen "Reitplatz", der das macht. 
Siehe auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a#Reitstall
Bobbi123 (2024-04-05 21:44:37+00:00): Vielen Dank für den Hinweis. Dann hatte ich die Definition im Wiki falsch verstanden. Ich habe es gerade auf korrekt Reitplatz geändert.

Ja, der Reitplatz gehört zu dem Reiterhof dazu.
Hufkratzer (2024-04-05 22:02:17+00:00): Du bist nicht der Einzige, der das verwechselt hat.
ivanbranco (2024-05-02 17:00:44+00:00): Hi Abimelec, thanks for your edits and welcome to OSM!

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11785264999/history

I noticed this tree, is mapped inside a building, is it correct? Also please notice that the standard unit is meters, so circumference=162 means a circumference of 162 meters. This isn't likely, maybe it should be fixed with circumference=1.62

good mapping :)
ivanbranco (2024-05-02 17:02:05+00:00): Hola Abimelec, gracias por tus ediciones y ¡bienvenido a OSM!

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11785264999/history

Me di cuenta de este árbol, está mapeado dentro de un edificio, ¿es correcto? También tenga en cuenta que la unidad estándar es metros, por lo que circumference=162 significa una circunferencia de 162 metros. Esto no es probable, tal vez debería ser fijado con circumference=1.62

buen mapping :)

Traducción realizada con DeepL.com
tastrax (2024-04-08 09:27:41+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
Rngrk (2024-04-04 02:57:58+00:00): Remove unnecessary nodes
impiaaa (2024-04-04 18:27:59+00:00): Thanks for contributing to OSM! It would be helpful if your changeset description were more specific about what you changed and why. For example, "Added an apartment office, referencing the property management website." See more info here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Tommybara (2024-04-12 20:31:53+00:00): Google Maps is not 100% correct about Vietnamese geographical features' names, so please do not rely solely on it. Please also use information from the documents "Thông tư ban hành Danh mục địa danh dân cư, sơn văn, thủy văn, kinh tế - xã hội phục vụ công tác thành lập bản đồ tỉnh XX" by the Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment of Vietnam (Bộ Tài nguyên Môi trường). Thanks!
Tommybara (2024-04-12 19:48:41+00:00): Only the upstream section of this river is named "Sông Pha", the downstream section to the confluence with Sông Cái is named "Sông Ông". https://thuvienphapluat.vn/van-ban/Tai-nguyen-Moi-truong/Thong-tu-33-2015-TT-BTNMT-Danh-muc-dia-danh-dan-cu-son-van-thuy-van-kinh-te-xa-hoi-Ninh-Thuan-287264.aspx
MxxCon (2024-04-05 03:32:58+00:00): Hello.
 As documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused:* a proper way to tag a business as closed is not just add disused=yes tag, but rather to update the primary tag with disused: prefix. For example, that closed Rite Aid, what you should've done is change the tag amenity=pharmacy into disused:amenity=pharmacy.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149550160
rayl- (2024-04-05 04:19:47+00:00): Thanks! learned something new!
I'll be sure to follow the standard going forward
Rngrk (2024-04-04 02:56:58+00:00): Remove excessive nodes
Rngrk (2024-04-04 02:57:52+00:00): Remove unnecessary nodes
Rngrk (2024-04-04 02:57:07+00:00): Remove excessive nodes
Rngrk (2024-04-04 02:57:46+00:00): Remove unnecessary nodes
DD1GJ (2024-04-04 19:01:32+00:00): revert, Löschungen privater Pools rückgängig gemacht.

Hallo Ch1ckenfried,

es ist normal, dass bei OSM private Pools erfasst werden. Es war auch richtig, dass Du das vergessene access=private nachgetragen hast. Es ist aber unwahr,  dass diese die Karte "zuspammen".

OSM ist keine Karte, sondern eine Geodatenbank, daraus werden Karten und Auswertungen aller Art erzeugt. Wenn ein Kartenersteller private Pools nicht will, dann kann er diese bei der Kartenerstellung problemlos herausfiltern. Ein pauschales Löschen korrekt eingetragener Dinge ist im Projekt unerwünscht.
phoenixsaigon1698 (2024-04-04 09:14:49+00:00): This relation 17426435 is missing "to" member. Please help to check again. ;) Thank you GrabVN_QThoai.

Also the relation 17426436 is having some error.
phoenixsaigon1698 (2024-04-04 09:22:52+00:00): I fixed for you. Please check again. to understand the geometry of a no u turn
DD1GJ (2024-04-04 19:02:04+00:00): revert, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149550205
Xvtn (2024-04-04 14:44:12+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Since you requested a review, I looked over your recent changesets. Looks great, nice job! The only suggestion I have is to not go too crazy on the "smoothing". If there are a really excessive amount of nodes along a way, it makes it slightly harder for later mappers to edit things if they end up changing.

How many is too many? The opinions vary quite a bit. In my opinion, we should use "as few as possible, but as many as necessary." But I'm sure you'll get a feel for what's best and develop your own opinion. :)

Let me know if you have any questions, and thanks for your contributions!
Xvtn (2024-04-04 14:46:09+00:00): Oh, also - see this short post on how to map nice curves: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Xvtn/diary/401601

(As you can see from the comments, people disagree on how many is too many. Lol)
nevw (2024-04-04 05:20:58+00:00): This changeset followed this discussion on the community forum 'https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/watercourse-name-appears-incorrectly-mapped/111268/4
tekim (2024-04-04 16:30:09+00:00): Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap!  It is great to have you as part of our community.  Thanks for your edit to the map, and for citing your sources.  Unfortunately, we are not allowed to use Google Maps, which is one of the sources you cited when editing OpenStreetMap.
tekim (2024-04-04 16:30:23+00:00): Reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149578447
tekim (2024-04-04 16:43:38+00:00): Use of Yelp is also not allowed "...you may not sell, license, copy, publish, modify, reproduce, distribute, create derivative works or adaptations of, publicly display or in any way use or exploit any of the Yelp Content in whole or in part ..."
N1T3R (2024-04-05 00:59:28+00:00): For such a huge changeset, can you split it into multiple uploads in the future?
To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
Combine changes in a small geographical area within a (city, district or province)
Keep changes within the same (country)
Upload/Save changes before moving on to map in a different area.
See: Changeset. Changeset - OpenStreetMap Wiki. (n.d.). https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset