piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Mammi71 (2026-07-19 13:50:59+00:00): Danke für die Antwort. Ich kenne mich in Wustrow nicht ganz so gut aus, habe aber in Zingst ähnliche Änderungen von Dir gesehen.
Ja, zur Strandreinigung und Entfernung von Seegras oder Strandgut können auch mal Traktoren oder Radlader benutzt werden. Aber macht es diese Wege dann gleich zu highway=service? 
In Zingst sehe ich frühmorgens, bevor die meisten Urlauber erwachen, häufig allerlei Kraftfahrzeuge auf und an dem Deich: Müllentsorgung, Reinigungsfirmen (Toilettenreinigung), Straßenreinigung etc. Die Wasserrettung fährt da mit ihrem Quad, der Deich wird im Notfall mit Rettungswagen befahren oder auch als Hubschrauberlandeplatz benutzt. Macht es diese Wege zu service?
Protoxenus (2026-07-19 19:13:23+00:00): Ja, wenn der Weg so breit und so beschaffen ist, dass dort zweispurige Fahrzeuge entlang fahren können & ihn regelmäßig benutzen, dann ist es ein highway=service. Das ist eine vorgesehene Nutzung und nicht missbräuchlich oder Notfall.
Ich werde diese Wege weiterhin so kartieren.
Gruß Protoxenus
NeisBot (2025-04-03 09:51:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment
Allison P (2025-04-03 15:12:18+00:00): Spam reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164469942
NeisRevert (2025-04-03 18:16:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/164478222 where the changeset comment is: 
Remove vandalism
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-07 18:41:00+00:00): wycofane w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164648149 jako nieprzedyskutowany import, po zignorowaniu https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164065893
Sébastien Pi (2025-11-12 07:47:20+00:00): Bonjour Mathias,

Cette zone fait l’objet d’une nouvelle note. Souhaiterais-tu participer à l’échange ?
Tu avais remis les bicyle=yes sur les footway. Mais un utilisateur s’y oppose. Pour moi, ça ressemble à une voie partagé qui devrait être en path plutôt.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5033151

Merci
NeisRevert (2025-04-03 18:16:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/164478200 where the changeset comment is: 
Remove vandalism
silversurfer83 (2025-04-03 16:37:11+00:00): Hi :)

ein paar Anmerkungen:

- bitte hinterlasse uns allen bessere Kommentare an deinen Änderungen. Fehler und Änderung sind leider wenig hilfreich.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

- wenn ich das richtig sehe arbeitest du hier in NRW. Da kannst du auf die Luftbilder des Landes (NRW DOP) zurückgreifen. Die sind wesentlich genauer ausgerichtet als die meisten Alternativen.

happy mapping
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164456805
LaniusCollurio (2025-04-28 08:35:39+00:00): Buongiorno i dati su toponimi e numeri civici della Provincia di Biella derivano in gran parte dagli open data della Provincia stessa. In particolare derivano dallo Stradario Provinciale redatto negli anni con la collaborazione di Comuni. Le strade a cui avete attribuito un toponimo fittizio sono senza nome, i nomi delle Frazioni sono legati alla località e ai numeri civici ma non alla strada. Siete pertanto pregati di correggere togliendo le modifiche fatte
wombatmaper (2025-08-13 11:19:23+00:00): hey! why did you change the vegan=only to vegan=yes? Isnt everything vegan here?
josterburg (2025-08-13 19:41:58+00:00): Maybe this wasn't displayed correclty in the App at that time. So more a mistake than a intended change.
Thanks for checking.
wombatmaper (2025-08-13 19:52:39+00:00): Thanks, no worries!
I have noticed quite a few edits like this and have the feeling that organic maps is a bit unclear about this, see my issue here: https://github.com/organicmaps/organicmaps/issues/11132
lankapuhelin (2025-04-04 14:39:11+00:00): Hei, oletko lukenut Wikistä ohjeet hyödyllisiin muutoskokoelmakommentteihin? Tämä usein käyttämäsi ilmaisu "kartoitettu asuinaluetta" on miltei hyödytön... https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
liljaadeliina (2025-04-06 10:44:38+00:00): Kiitos viestistä, tutustun sivuun.
ConsEbt (2025-04-05 11:50:37+00:00): Hello there, I am wondering why you removed these drive ways? They are clearly visible on the NSW aerial images. Might not be perfect but I was working on that.  I'd appreciate if you reconsider your deletion.
zenbu (2025-04-05 21:25:18+00:00): I live here so know it well. As entered the mapped driveways go over several fences and gardens. Better to start again IMHO.
fortera_au (2025-04-06 06:53:05+00:00): In that case, would you be able to add in the correct driveways where they are, if you're local you'd be best placed to map them correctly compared to others using aerial imagery.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164457780
Sakari_N (2025-04-09 16:27:59+00:00): Onko wayt 60467591, 34261691, 1021694844 tarkoituksellisesti eri tieluokassa kuin muu tie? 

Aviabulevardin ympyrän segmentit 357850985 ja 357850986 ovat varmasti oikein, koska ne on tässä changesetissä laskettu secondary -> tertiary, kun taas muu ympyrä on nostettu secondary -> primary. Hieman samantyylinen toteutus on Keimolantien ja Riipiläntien ympyröissä. Onko näihin joku syvempi logiikka jota en hahmota? 

Tikkurilantien tieluokka putoaa Pakkalantien kohdalla secondaryyn vähän pidemmälle matkalle. Jäin miettimään, että mihin tuo tieluokan raja pitäisi vetää, jos tuon pätkän katsoo olevan secondary. Nyt se näyttää olevan rajattu keskikorokkeen olemassaoloon, mutta tikkurilantie on muutenkin vaihtelevasti erotettu/erottamaton ajorata. Jos rajaus perustuisi liikennevirtoihin, se pitäisi varmaan tehdä Turbiinitien risteyksestä ja idässä... sopivan kohdan löytäminen voi olla vaikeampaa.
tesp (2025-06-02 14:59:20+00:00): haluaisin huomauttaa, että primary ja trunk ovat suunnilleen samantasoisia. Eli karttaa voi nykytilassa lukea, että Tikkurilantie ja Kehä III ovat suunnilleen samantasoisia. highway=primary tulisi mielestäni käyttää mahdollisimman vähän
Ahtojää (2025-06-02 17:11:11+00:00): Millä perusteella primary ja trunk ovat suunnilleen samantasoisia? OSM Wikin mukaan erot ovat selviä.
Dimitar155 (2025-04-05 18:11:33+00:00): Здравей Пламен,

Имената на улиците в адресите не отговарят на имената на улиците в ОСМ. Може ли да коригираш първите?

Поздрави,
Митко
KNaing (2025-09-03 08:59:32+00:00): Thanks for your collaboration. Please make sure to draw your buildings as accurately as possible and don't forget to square the building, select them and type 'Q'
literan (2025-04-03 19:58:58+00:00): зачем вы убрали тег здания (building=yes)? Пожалуйста, совершайте правки осмысленно
geo_ozon (2025-04-03 20:53:36+00:00): Здравствуйте, извините, работу над ошибками проведем, спасибо за комментарий
aharvey (2025-04-04 01:13:05+00:00): hi I'm not sure what you mean by "open plan" but for the 5 units you've mapped if they are sharing a common wall, but next to each other and not on top what you have for the outlines is good, but for the tags I would use building=house + house=terraced per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:house

It looks like the unit number 4 is repeated in your mapping though.
geisthugo123 (2025-04-03 21:13:37+00:00): Dieses seperate statt separate geht mir so gegen den Geist, vorallem weil es in ID auch noch vorgeschlagen wird.
Vielen vielen Dank für den Fix.
Viele Grüße
ayxis (2025-04-07 06:18:43+00:00): Immer gerne! :D
kesäpäivä (2025-04-03 13:36:14+00:00): Ennen näin laajamittaisia tieluokkamuutoksia pyytäisin keskustelemaan aiheesta foorumin puolella: https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/fi/67
Muokkaaja (2025-04-03 16:01:38+00:00): En kyllä kannata kaikkien näiden teiden korotusta, esim. Tarhurintie/Kyläkaivontie on hyvin vähän läpiajettu, joten sille palauttaisin highway=primary. Koivukylänväylä ja Läntinen Valkoisenlähteentie ihan ok olla primary
Ahtojää (2025-04-04 07:49:34+00:00): Olen kyllä avoin keskustelulle sekä periaatteesta että yksittäisten katujen valinnoista. Nyt käytössä on lähinnä secondary-luokkaa ja satunnaisia tertiary-katuja. Pääkatu eli primary-luokkaa ei ole käytetty lainkaan, vaan trunk-verkolta hypätään suoraan laajalle secondary-verkolle. Eli en nyt näkisi tätä niin dramaattisena muutoksena, muutin jotkut secondary-luokan kadut primary-luokkaan; sellaiset jotka toimivat linkkeinä trunk- ja secondary-luokkien välillä.
spiregrain (2025-04-03 14:43:00+00:00): Is the 1st June opening date posted locally?  Would it be worth setting a conditional access tag, something like:    
access:conditional=no @ (2025 April 01 to 2025 May 31)
spiregrain (2025-04-03 14:43:41+00:00): (should be a '-' hyphen not the word 'to')
roland_sw (2025-04-03 18:44:03+00:00): > Is the 1st June opening date posted locally?

Yeah, there is a sign at the end of the bridge, although I can't count days in the month so it reopens on 31st. I was planning on just editing it again when it reopened, but don't mind if it gets changed to a conditional access
eggie (2025-04-03 12:09:39+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Je zegt een deel loopt over priveterrein. Geldt dit dan voor het hele traject of alleen voor de veldweg vanaf 'Egypte'?
Nu routeert er niets meer.
Feedback 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-04-04 05:41:07+00:00): Dag JKG,
Je hebt niet meer gereageerd.

Ik heb foot=permissive toegevoegd zodat het in ieder geval voor wandelaars weer routeert.

Wellicht kun je nog verduidelijken wat je bedoeling was. Wat bedoel je met verkeer? Voetgangers?

MVG
eggie
JKG12HK (2025-04-04 06:50:55+00:00): Hoi eggie,

Zo snel had ik nog niet kunnen reageren ;-)
Even ter verduidelijking: ik werk voor de Stichting Toerisme Regiomarketing Zuidoost Friesland en ben door de eigenaar van een deel van het terrein gebeld over dat er mountainbikers en voetgangers over zijn terrein komen, en dat hij dat absoluut niet wil. 

Het gaat niet om het gehele stuk vanaf Egypte. Het is gezien vanaf de onderkant van het circuit op de kaart het stukje naar links, en dan het stukje naar onderen. Ik kan eventueel een screenshot sturen van het betreffende deel. Ik kan u eventueel ook in contact brengen met de eigenaar.

Hoor het graag.

Mvg
eggie (2025-04-04 07:08:30+00:00): Beste Stichting Toerisme Regiomarketing Zuidoost Friesland , 
Het is me uit de beschrijving nog niet duidelijk over welk deel het gaat. Voorlopig heb ik de access=private weer verwijderd.
De tag zal toch echt op het bewuste stuk moeten komen. 
Kun je als voetganger wel op e.o.a manier wandelen van Egypte naar de Prikkedam? 
Ook zal door de eigenaar op 'blijkbare wijze' moeten aangeven wat wel en niet is toegestaan. 
Bv dmv bebording art 461 wvs.  of een hek. 
Het moet wel duidelijk zijn voor het publiek. 
Je kunt het bewuste wegdeel afsplitsen en dan de tag toevoegen die van toepassing is. 
vehicle=no? access=private?
Ik stuur je even een PB met mijn mailadres. 
Dan kan ik naar meer verduidelijking de 'toegang' op het juiste deel aanpassen. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-04-04 07:24:49+00:00): Voorgaande mapper even geïnformeerd.
DwarfNebula_ (2025-04-03 11:14:23+00:00): Overigens zal ik ook proberen de overige wijken, subwijken en buurten toe te voegen
Jordi MF (2025-04-03 11:49:13+00:00): Hola haabee,

Gracias por dedicarle tiempo a este proyecto. Yo intento mapear algo por el sur de Valencia. Viendo que, igual que yo, estás corrigiendo vías etiquetadas incorrectamente como unclassified y que deberían de ser "track" o "service", intentaré mapear por esta zona para intenta avanzar más rápido.

Si ves alguna edición mía en la que no estás de acuerdo, por favor, coméntamelo para corregirme y que sigamos los mismos criterios.

Un saludo
Aarogya Pandey (2025-04-03 11:33:52+00:00): Very Impressive, well mapped, keep mapping.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164459890
BakoyeRiver (2025-04-04 00:45:07+00:00): Thank you!
Adam Franco (2025-04-07 17:05:23+00:00): `natural=wood` isn't an appropriate tag for the boundary=protected_area object itself as the entire area is not woods. There are also marshes and ponds enclosed. Additionally, the area of trees extends beyond the boundary and this larger area is what could have natural=wood applied rather than the boundary line itself.
SteveKHayes (2025-04-07 17:33:38+00:00): thanks for the note, would the more appropriate treatment resemble referenced area, with broad forested area mapped as outer, and features other than forest mapped as inner elements?

Relation: High Tor Wildlife Management Area (6367570)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6367570#map=13/42.63945/-77.34495
SteveKHayes (2025-04-07 17:37:03+00:00): reference specific to wooded area:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18132478#map=14/42.61972/-77.36701
Adam Franco (2025-04-07 17:42:36+00:00): Hi Steve, thanks for the quick reply. Relation 18132478 is an appropriate treatment. You'll want to add the ponds and any other no-tree areas as "inner" elements to the natural=wood multipolygon, but you are on the right track. :-)
SteveKHayes (2025-04-07 17:50:02+00:00): Thanks for the feedback, I will create a project to enhance the treatment of those areas
Adam Franco (2025-04-07 17:54:48+00:00): Don't hesitate to reach out if you have other questions. You can contact me through messages here or on the OSM-US Slack (where myself and a few thousand other mappers coordinate our efforts): https://openstreetmap.us/get-involved/slack/

If you join the Slack, check out the #local-new-york, #protected-lands, and #forest-mapping channels as they may be of interest to you.

Cheers!
Adam
Adam Franco (2025-04-07 17:02:53+00:00): `natural=wood` isn't an appropriate tag for the boundary=protected_area object itself as the entire area is not woods. There are also marshes and ponds enclosed. Additionally, the area of trees extends beyond the boundary and this larger area is what could have natural=wood applied rather than the boundary line itself.
VLD290 (2025-05-06 22:48:04+00:00): Thanks for fixing that copy paste error! I appreciate it.

- Jonathon
eggie (2025-04-03 12:13:10+00:00): Hi merged your info with the addressnode.
Please use the present addressnode.

Greetz,
eggie
muralito (2025-04-03 20:39:02+00:00): Gracias. ¿Y sabes con los numeros de puerta que hicieron? porque si no hicieron nada queda todo mal, salteado...
David García Martínez (2025-04-03 22:38:18+00:00): Hola! Sí, se modificaron los números de la cuadra para mantener la correlatividad. Ya quedaron corregidos con los números nuevos
IEEE1164 (2025-04-06 21:42:22+00:00): Lembergstraße is a public road access=private seems to be wrong here. On the two ways 803757733 and 12771899, access for motor vehicles is only permitted for residents (motor_vehicle=destination). Pedestrians or bicycles, for example, are allowed through. The path 1374402564 has no signs restricting access, motor_vehicle=destination should be removed here. The sign restricting access for motor vehicles westwards is located near Lembergstraße 50.
World_Winner (2025-04-08 03:39:43+00:00): Hi IEEE1164,

Thank you for your feedback on the recent edits I made to the access tags on this road. Changeset reverted as per the feedback so that the motor_vehicle=destination tag has been restored. Additionally, the unnecessary motor_vehicle restriction tag has been removed from the additional way.
Baloo Uriza (2025-07-29 13:30:04+00:00): Restriction already implied by access=no on crossover.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164461563
amakarevich_lyft (2025-07-31 10:03:48+00:00): Hi, Baloo Uriza,

My name is Artem, and I'm OSM Policy Lead at Lyft. As we mentioned in the comment to changeset 166200809 we informed our entire team about this case to prevent such mapping in the future. I apologize for any inconvenience caused by the edit.

Best regards, Artem
NeisBot (2025-04-03 13:01:35+00:00): Hi French1992, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 81% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 4 building(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=164461612
IrynaStaradub (2025-04-03 12:04:53+00:00): Also fixed geometry and class of the road.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-07 18:41:13+00:00): wycofane w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164648149 jako nieprzedyskutowany import, po zignorowaniu https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164065893
mavl (2025-05-13 15:06:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
TrickyFoxy (2025-04-03 14:54:37+00:00): есои вы склеваете из-за https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164421151#c1410711 склевать нужно всю дорогу. Склеил
ssundell (2025-04-07 16:27:32+00:00): Miksi tuolla Mäkipäänkadulta kerrostalon pihalle vievällä väylällä on "motor_vehicle=designated"? Sehän siis tarkoittaa, että kyseessä olisi erityisesti moottoriajoneuvoille tarkoitettu väylä, mikä nähdäkseni on aika harvoin tarpeellinen tai oikea merkintä.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164461964
Laatikko22 (2025-04-11 18:03:56+00:00): Hyvä kysymys. Ei tarkoituksella laitettu. Korjasin.
felipeeugenio (2025-04-03 15:05:21+00:00): Hola. No toda área verde es un parque. Marqué varias como grass.
Saludos
Yog Sot (2025-04-03 22:44:59+00:00): warnings:disconnected_way:highway	1

rozwiązuj takie błędy przed zapisem pls ;)
Mercanto123 (2025-04-04 04:50:32+00:00): To jest ścieżka niepowiązana z niczym, rozwiązałem ten błąd neutralizując ją. Ogólnie ktoś ją rysując miał bardzo dziwny pomysł, jak nie oznaczył wszystkich ścieżek dookoła kościoła to po co nagle narysował tą?
Jrachi (2025-04-04 16:05:00+00:00): Ciao.
Quando aggiungi un guidepost, sulla relazione devi aggiungere il ruolo guidepost.

Ivo
Paolo Montevecchi (2025-04-04 16:27:00+00:00): Grazie Ivo, io ho inserito ormai centinaia di guidepost come ho inserito questo. Mi puoi spiegare cosa dovrei fare perchè sia corretto.
Jrachi (2025-04-04 20:56:56+00:00): Tu usi iD e per aggiungere il ruolo dovresti trovarlo nella casella sotto il membro. Basta scrivere "guidepost".
Aggiungere il ruolo su un percorso composto di 185 membri come questo significa consumare la rotella del mouse per trovare i nodi. Che su iD non vengono posizionati in ordine logico ma in base a quello di inserimento...
Si tratta di una situazioni in cui l'uso di Josm aiuta molto, ma molto!

Ivo
Paolo Montevecchi (2025-04-05 09:38:04+00:00): Ancora grazie,
io uso JOSM (in modo elementare) per ordinare i membri e fare cose semplici "massive"
Mi sembra di aver capito che entrando nella tabella dei membri della relazione basta scrivere "guidepost" nella colonna ruolo e salvare.
Se va bene fare così passo tutti i sentieri del CAI di Imola senza problemi.
Jrachi (2025-04-05 11:23:58+00:00): Si, esattamente.
Il testo viene memorizzato, per cui dopo la prima volta ti basta scrivere "g" per avere il valore compilato.
Se selezioni più membri puoi applicare il ruolo in un sol colpo usando la casella in basso.
Andrea Musuruane (2025-04-04 13:50:29+00:00): Ciao. Perche' stai inserendo i nomi delle localita' sulle strade? Questo non e' corretto. Queste vie non hanno nome. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164462581
divaddivag (2025-05-05 11:33:07+00:00): Bonjour Aurélien, vous m'apprenez de nouveau noms de routes: c'est du ni vu, ni connu ni entendu parler pour ma part. Ces noms n'apparaissent que sur la page wikipedia, qui visiblement confond gestionnaire (Alicorn) et nom de route. Merci de retirer ces noms erronés. David
AurélienQ (2025-05-05 15:57:36+00:00): Regardez mieux la page Wikipédia avant de critiquer 😉
AurélienQ (2025-05-05 15:58:22+00:00): PS : https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autoroute_A88_(France)
Dans l'infobox, sous le plan.
divaddivag (2025-05-05 17:32:58+00:00): Merci pour ton retour rapide qui confirme que tu ne disposes pas de plus d'infos que la page wikipedia.
Bonne soirée D
AurélienQ (2025-05-05 18:23:36+00:00): Ah bas oui, excuse moi j'ai mal lu ton message 🙃. Après quelques recherches je ne peux que te donner raison.
Je corrige.
Bonne soirée
divaddivag (2025-05-06 04:50:46+00:00): Merci 🙏
reigi (2025-04-04 04:58:57+00:00): Hallo Lennan, ist der Weg mit dem blau-weißen Schild gekennzeichnet? Nur dass sind die Wege "designated". Siehe Wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:bicycle%3Ddesignated Ist ziemlich selten geworden im Kreis Heinsberg. Wenn beschildert, dann sinnvollerweise bitte auch das Verkehrszeichen dazu taggen.
Lennan (2025-04-04 05:48:27+00:00): Ne natürlich nicht :D Hab nicht gesehen, dass er designated auswählt wenn man Fahrradweg als Wegart nimmt.
Lennan (2025-04-04 05:52:02+00:00): Ach Rad und Fußweg geht nur als designated. Wow das klingt schwachsinnig für mich :D Naja dann ist das jetzt wieder geändert.
Kovoschiz (2025-04-03 17:16:48+00:00): This already had `covered=yes`
Gorger (2025-04-04 13:55:22+00:00): Hi Kovoschiz,  I have reassessed the scenario and, as per your feedback, I saw that setting tunnel=yes was superfluous.  Thank you for making the corrections.
lankapuhelin (2025-04-04 16:19:04+00:00): Hi, I think dirt is unlikely (it implies "natural" ground). I suspect that compacted is the correct value
Alexander Slesarev (2025-04-16 08:12:14+00:00): Yeah; the car was drowning though. But I think it was indeed just an unusually bad day.
Frans S (2025-04-03 13:53:23+00:00): Please square each rectangular building.
See my comment on another changeset about the building plugin!
Best regards
Frans S (2025-04-03 13:53:50+00:00): nearly 200 buildings have been squared by me.
onesimusGGA (2025-04-03 17:25:25+00:00): Hello Frans S,
Thank you for the feedbacks concerning the unsquared buildings about a day ago and today's. I am using josm and the building plugin tool.

So i decided to update my josm software to the latest version before mapping today, since it's been a while i contributed. When i saw the campaign concerning the call for mappers, i decided to come board even though it's my semester exam's season. So getting the same feedback really bothers me cause i still used the building plugin after the update.

However, i noticed something. Every time i used the building tool, the orthogonal shape is somewhat distorted by default which is very unusual when using the building tool. I'll have to select it manually and use the 'Q' key to square it. Knowing how time taking it will be to select the buildings individually to apply the 'Q' key, i will map the entire area and use the search tool to select all building edits in the area then apply the 'Q' key, ensuring all building edits are perfectly squared before submitting the task as completed.

I have received good mapping comments and feedbacks from you in past humanitarian mapping efforts similar to this, but this will be the first 'not so good' repetitive feedback.
reigi (2025-04-04 05:05:45+00:00): Hallo Lennan, bitte auch die Beschilderung mit angeben. Beispiel: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/112307262
Lennan (2025-04-04 06:11:30+00:00): Ergänzt!
reigi (2025-04-04 05:07:49+00:00): Hallo Lennan, bitte 2 Werte nicht mit Komma, sondern Semikolon trennen
Lennan (2025-04-04 06:13:26+00:00): Alles klar
Hb- (2025-04-17 11:15:35+00:00): Für die Relation: 12737387 fehlen die Start- und Ziellinien