piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Leo Slager (2026-07-20 12:06:44+00:00): Niet helemaal correct,
De bestaande address-node en je nieuwe node zijn samengevoegd.
Technisch gezien blijft de oudste node in de database staan.
Verder heb ik de juiste tag toegevoegd en de node verschoven in de richting van de ingang.
Dynteq (2026-07-20 12:30:47+00:00): Ok, dakjewel.
Wat mij betreft staat het er zo goed in en is dit topic klaar.
user_5359 (2026-07-20 18:01:29+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on  https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14019793772. (one of twenty six objects) What is the mean of the tag Dagvattenbrunn = Himna skola? Is there any difference to the tag Dagvattenbunn = Himna skola (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14019793766)?
Syl (2026-07-17 07:34:18+00:00): Bonjour, il n'y a pas besoin de dédoubler les écoles, copier tous les attributs du nœud sur la surface suffit. Pouvez-vous corriger ?
Gen_Gavi (2026-07-17 16:12:12+00:00): Bonjour,
Il faut copier les attributs du nœud sur la surface, puis supprimer le nœud ?
Est-ce que j'ai bien compris ?
Syl (2026-07-17 16:54:12+00:00): Oui c'est ça. Et si la surface contient plusieurs écoles, on peut laisser les nœuds et mettre landuse=education sur la surface (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:landuse%3Deducation).

Au passage, merci pour ces ajouts !
Gen_Gavi (2026-07-19 22:37:01+00:00): J'ai choisi cette deuxième solution, qui parait plus adaptée.
Merci pour ce conseil !
特蕾西娅 (2026-07-18 16:16:31+00:00): These edits seriously violate the principle of mapping based on the actual line of control. Nearly all of these changes are heavily influenced by political considerations. I do not understand why some Indian contributors believe that everything should conform to India's preferred viewpoint.

If content is removed simply because it is written in Chinese or presents information that is unfavorable to India, that is not an appropriate approach. OpenStreetMap is a global project that serves users all over the world and should remain politically neutral. Its data is also widely used by researchers, scholars, and organizations in many countries.

For disputed areas, it is common to maintain multiple representations of the claims—for example, one reflecting Country A's claim and another reflecting Country B's claim—while the rendered map can display the current line of actual control or the de facto administrative situation. This approach is valuable because it allows researchers and users from different countries to access objective and comprehensive geographic information.

Therefore, certain data should not be removed simply because of political preferences. Mapping decisions should be based on verifiable facts and established OpenStreetMap principles, rather than political viewpoints.
maro21 (2026-07-18 23:27:57+00:00): Please write changeset comments. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
maro21 (2026-07-18 23:28:29+00:00): Please write changeset comments. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
b-jazz (2026-07-17 22:27:27+00:00): Another example is https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14019884508 that doesn't join the green way.
AntMadeira (2026-07-18 21:38:15+00:00): Olá, eyw27.
Obrigado pelas tuas edições no mapa.

Podes explicar qual o motivo para teres passado a EN 360 de secundária para primária?

Cumprimentos,
António Madeira.
AndyB_66 (2026-07-16 16:30:32+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
gpserror (2026-07-16 13:06:45+00:00): please check that there's not already another duplicate nearby.  I saw three cameras that were pointing in the same direction and had similar tags.  i kept yours because it had more information but deleted the duplicates.  I prefer that you add information to existing cameras instead of deleting/readding but duplicates are bad.
Wildsharky (2026-07-21 06:06:51+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185899280
Kovoschiz (2026-07-19 09:55:26+00:00): Theres's stairs on the left https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Beacon_Hill,_Hong_Kong_-_panoramio_(30).jpg
vectorial8192 (2026-07-21 16:13:18+00:00): OSM data previously claimed to have a staircase that connects with the bridge area. I could not identify any staircase at the bridge area that satisfies this property.
Kovoschiz (2026-07-22 08:39:26+00:00): Again, either the `bridge=` or `=steps` has an inaccurate extent. You shouldn't merely delete it.
MassCartog (2026-07-16 14:21:40+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM. Could you explain what you mean when you say "Updated the RFT shapefile"?

Heatmap data from the last 12 months seem to show your changes have made these trails less accurate. Also, you entirely removed a trail that seems to still exist. Could you please explain a bit more why you made these changes? Thanks

See what I mean here:
https://i.imgur.com/tZbT82E.png
MassCartog (2026-07-16 14:27:31+00:00): PS Sorry, to be more clear, I understand you updated the RFT trail's geometry. I'm wondering why and where you got that data.
Josh Broadhilt (2026-07-16 19:29:42+00:00): That section of the RFT recently had a good bit of trail work done to it. Old sections were closed and new sections were added. I went out there yesterday to ground truth it, then adjusted the track to be in line with what I saw on the ground.
MassCartog (2026-07-16 20:38:36+00:00): Cool thanks for the additional details for my curiosity, Happy mapping!
onterof (2026-07-30 19:59:15+00:00): Hi,
gibt es einen Grund dafür die bestehende Klassifizierung der Straßen von z.B. highway=unclassified auf highway=road zu ändern?
Entgegen der Wort-Bedeutung steht unclassified nämlich gerade NICHT für eine fehlende Klassifizierung, dafür ist der jetzt vorhandene Wert highway=road vorgesehen. 
Sollte mMn also rückgängig gemacht werden.
Grüße
Wildsharky (2026-07-17 09:53:31+00:00): Revert of https://osmcha.org/changesets/185815022
Kovoschiz (2026-07-17 07:32:47+00:00): You removed the `building=` of the `=sports_centre`
rajdhani (2026-07-19 13:19:06+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186007130
FajrAl (2026-07-17 03:16:53+00:00): If you map landuse or natural features, please avoid creating excessive vertices. Using the Simplify tool helps produce cleaner, more maintainable geometries. Tip: use value 1.
adigis (2026-07-17 21:30:32+00:00): Hi Sir, could you please provide an example of how to correctly create land use? Perhaps you could share a changeset link?
FajrAl (2026-07-19 02:43:19+00:00): Several terraced houses have been mapped as individual buildings, even though they form a continuous row. If it is difficult to map each unit accurately (for example, when using the iD editor), it is perfectly acceptable to map the entire row as a single building and tag it with building=terrace. This is generally preferred over drawing inaccurate individual footprints. Tip: Press Q to square rectangular buildings.
FajrAl (2026-07-17 03:17:53+00:00): If you map landuse or natural features, please avoid creating excessive vertices. Using the Simplify tool helps produce cleaner, more maintainable geometries. Tip: use value 1.
adigis (2026-07-17 21:30:17+00:00): Hi Sir, could you please provide an example of how to correctly create landuse? Perhaps you could share a changeset link?
FajrAl (2026-07-18 00:07:29+00:00): You did good, what you should do next is selects the landuse/natural, and press Shift+Y to simplify. https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Help/Action/SimplifyWay
adigis (2026-07-19 07:39:07+00:00): I would like to see the land use you have created, and I would like to use it as a reference.
FajrAl (2026-07-19 11:36:21+00:00): Hi! Here is how I usually map landuse. Since this is an urban area, I prefer to use fewer vertices/nodes. Urban landscapes are highly dynamic, so using fewer nodes makes the data much easier to maintain. It also benefits other contributors who use the iD editor when they need to make updates in the future. You can check this changeset for reference: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186000831
user_5359 (2026-07-17 10:02:12+00:00): Hello! Please check my correction of http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1539752838. I changed your tag 
(new tag) = Herrington International School to 
name = Herrington International School
SomeoneElse (2026-07-17 14:05:02+00:00): Hello,
You've added what appears to be a Basque name to the start of the "name" of the SADR here.  Was that deliberate?
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2026-07-17 14:05:14+00:00): Kaixo,
RAEDren "izenaren" hasieran, badirudi izen baskoi bat gehitu diozu. Nahita egin al duzu hori?
Agur bero bat,
Andy
alex gabilondo (2026-07-17 15:14:31+00:00): Hi, Andy
Yes, my intention is to add the name in basque language to the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic.
SomeoneElse (2026-07-17 15:41:58+00:00): OK, then you'll need to add a "name:eu" to the object rather than editing the "name" tag.  You probably won't be able to use "Cartes.app" to do that.
alex gabilondo (2026-07-17 21:27:52+00:00): OK, thanks. I wanted to test the possibility of editing from cartes.app. I thought it was very useful but I see that it has its limitations.
TsebTra (2026-07-30 00:18:18+00:00): Connection doesnt exit in reality. Checkd in 3:00 30.07.26
LochnagarMountain (2026-07-31 10:28:30+00:00): Hello TsebTra, thank you for letting me know this connection no longer exists. I was using Mapillary ground level imagery which showed a u-turn sign here as support for my edit but that must be out of date now. I will remove [https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1539755959]. Have a nice day!
AndyB_66 (2026-07-16 16:29:54+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
osmviborg (2026-07-16 15:17:37+00:00): Den breakwater du slettede var tegnet efter 2025 billeder https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/quick-luftfoto-2023-nogle-omrader-i-danmark-er-klar/98511/24
osmviborg (2026-07-16 15:18:57+00:00): 2026 billeder
osmviborg (2026-07-16 15:25:43+00:00): Du redigere med JOSM. 2026 billederne er allerede i JOSM.
drkt (2026-07-16 16:14:42+00:00): Hvorfor var broen ikke rettet?
osmviborg (2026-07-17 10:35:14+00:00): Redigering er herfra: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181079825
pavel bankevich (2026-07-16 15:20:58+00:00): Added and edited tags, changed Feature Type according to OSM Wiki, #mapbox_attributes
Leo Slager (2026-07-16 20:57:30+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Leo Slager (2026-07-16 20:59:40+00:00): Wellicht is het beter om dat in een opmerking op de kaart te zetten.
Dan kan één van de ervaren mappers tzt de nodige wijzigingen doorvoeren.
Arent van Boetzelaer (2026-07-17 20:44:15+00:00): Beste Leo, Wellicht is dat inderdaad het beste. De gemeente wil een gedeelte van de Catharijnesingel afsluiten voor auto's en motoren vanaf 21 september 2026. Spoorstraat blijft bereikbaar vanuit het zuiden, de Stationstraat blijft bereikbaar vanuit het noorden. (en ik ben even 2 weken met vakantie)
felipeeugenio (2026-07-17 14:14:12+00:00): Hola. Estaban mal las direcciones? cual es el motivo de borrarlas?
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185849821
Luzandro (2026-07-31 13:28:23+00:00): Hallo,

das hat ein falsches oneway entfernt und ein anderes falsches beim Übergang gesetzt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_valhalla_bicycle&route=48.206757%2C16.38275%3B48.206414%2C16.382508#map=19/48.206874/16.381683&layers=N

habe es korrigiert
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185850430
0xjoke (2026-07-31 14:22:09+00:00): Danke, Luzandro!
t_ja (2026-07-16 16:59:45+00:00): Hi,
what is the purpose of adding "note=made conflict" to 316 nodes?
If there is any problem, then the original autor @Marián Kyral should be contacted to fix it. 
However, I tried Josm validator on this area and there are absolutely no problems reported for those nodes.

If this change is a mistake, then please fix it ASAP or let me know, and I will revert this changeset.
Yakari (kleiner Indianer) (2026-07-16 21:57:05+00:00): I need to meke conflict to edited dataset in JOSM. I will soon remove it.
Wildsharky (2026-07-21 06:07:43+00:00): Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185901267
FajrAl (2026-07-16 15:30:02+00:00): Please note: you should not perceive building by its shadow, but as an outline
DaveF (2026-07-18 17:14:37+00:00): edwq  fefe  fqqq hl;klllsd  sad  www f dgr 'er
Flynn_ (2026-07-18 17:46:57+00:00): Bless you :)
Woazboat (2026-07-21 21:14:08+00:00): Test comment 

foo=bar
foo=bar/blah=blub
`foo=bar`
`foo=bar`/`blah=blub`
Woazboat (2026-07-21 21:14:57+00:00): highway=footway
`highway=footway`
Woazboat (2026-07-21 21:17:00+00:00): 'highway=footway'
"highway=footway"
Woazboat (2026-07-21 21:20:43+00:00): highway='footway'
highway="footway"
highway=`footway`


'highway'=footway
"highway"=footway
`highway`=footway
Woazboat (2026-07-21 21:25:18+00:00): foo=bar=baz
foo=bar=blah=blub
Woazboat (2026-07-21 21:35:07+00:00): `foo=bar``blah=blub`
Woazboat (2026-07-21 21:36:07+00:00): foo=bar`blah=blub
`foo=bar`blah=blub
Woazboat (2026-07-21 21:37:00+00:00): foo=bar`baz
Woazboat (2026-07-21 21:39:03+00:00): fo`o=bar
fo`o=bar=baz
fo`o=bar=blah=blub
Woazboat (2026-07-21 21:39:51+00:00): foo=ba'r
f`oo=ba'r
Woazboat (2026-07-21 21:40:12+00:00): f'oo=bar
f'oo=ba'r
Woazboat (2026-07-21 21:41:08+00:00): `foo=bar
`foo=bar=baz
`foo=bar=blah=blub
FajrAl (2026-07-16 15:24:56+00:00): Please note: you should not perceive building by its shadow, but as an outline
Alliegaytor (2026-07-16 23:33:38+00:00): Hi, thanks for contributing to OSM.

Looking at way/1539777283 and the surrounding ways, it appears to be one building rather than 10 buildings. This should be mapped as one way.

Happy mapping!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185851694
FajrAl (2026-07-17 02:20:51+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1539777975 kenapa membuat kawasan permukiman hingga ke laut?

Serta, jangan menghapus batas administrasi https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8041721
FajrAl (2026-07-17 02:21:51+00:00): Perubahan telah dipulihkan dalam https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185879725
b-jazz (2026-07-17 22:25:33+00:00): Hey Pizza,

Can you be a little more careful when joining fairways to greens like https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14020226043? I've fixed several of these in the past couple of weeks and thought it would be worth reaching out and mentioning it to see if you could correct it at the source.

Thanks,
- b-jazz
PizzaTreeIsland (2026-07-18 01:53:09+00:00): Hi, 
Thanks for pointing that out! It's a bug with the function that lets you follow an existing path, I see you also already brought it up on the discord.
AndresDuhour (2026-07-16 20:56:18+00:00): Hola! Muchas gracias por la corrección! Te comento que voy a cambiar algunas cosas para corregir un error. Al mover el polígono del pueblo se movió también el arroyo. En OSM pasa muchas veces que los arroyos y las calles está asociados a polígonos administrativos. Y respecto de los nombres, estos deben ir con mayúsculas en la inicial y sin abreviaturas. Te dejo un link sobre el etiquetado de nombres (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres). Cualquier duda se puede intercambiar por acá o en el grupo de telegram de la comunidad de usuarios. Saludos!  Andrés
NieWnen (2026-07-21 21:28:19+00:00): Te zastąpienie starych to chyba nieco zbyt wcześnie :D

Te nowe wciąż nieaktywne z krzyżykiem i nie wiem czy podłączone w ogóle, bo dopiero zaczynają kopać jakieś rowy wzdłuż torów.

Jakieś prefiksy do tagów z disused:*/construction:* może warto do takich następnym razem :P
Anas masuris (2026-07-23 14:44:37+00:00): Jest w tym trochę racji xd (ten krzyżyk się dodaje jako railway:signal:(...):deactivated=yes)
FroschForscher (2026-07-16 18:46:41+00:00): node/14020257202: Ist "Jubi" beabsichtigt oder sollte es "Juni" sein?
rainerU (2026-07-16 18:56:22+00:00): Tippfehler, korrigiert. Danke für den Hinweis.
FajrAl (2026-07-16 16:25:07+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1539785802 these 3 are actually one building, please map as one.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-20 21:46:04+00:00): SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more information.

Reverted adding SEO spam POI with malformed tags/values in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/186084881
osmviborg (2026-07-17 03:58:53+00:00): Adresse- tags er forbeholdt de importerede punkter. https://lgms.nl/p/osm/cached-wiki/?page=Da:Adresser
pwbriggs (2026-07-16 18:50:34+00:00): Could also have fixed the address. I got it.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-07-31 16:40:36+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1529905067/history has image = https://streetcomplete.app/p/358001.jpg that was added in this edit
https://streetcomplete.app/p/358001.jpg is a link to a temporary files hosted at streetcomplete.app. Note that this images will be deleted after note is closed! So adding it to OSM objects is not very useful.

Upload your photos to for example Wikimedia Commons if you want to keep them (and link with wikimedia_commons=). Uploading photos made by someone else needs a license assignment.
JJIglesias (2026-07-18 23:20:54+00:00): Saludos y Gracias por querer contribuir al mapa. Pero deje de intentar agregar la misma información de multiples formas, líneas, areas, nodos, etc. Solo crea confusion en el Mapa, y nosotros terminamos borrando eso por duplicidad.

Otro detalle: NADA en el Mapa va en Mayúsculas sino Capitalizado, ósea solo la primera letra de una termino va en Mayúsculas el resto en Minúsculas.

Le enviamos un mensaje con instrucciones y sugerencias.

Gracias
Bienson (2026-07-17 03:06:02+00:00): Südliche Poller jetzt doppelt eingetragen
Bloomenwease (2026-07-17 04:42:16+00:00): Danke, ist behoben
LordGarySugar (2026-07-16 21:52:50+00:00): Hi, is the Miners Way a signposted walking route as shown in the linked pdf?
binarytales (2026-07-17 14:11:04+00:00): Yes. There are specially branded yellow arrow waymarker discs along the route
LordGarySugar (2026-07-19 00:35:54+00:00): Amazing! The reason I asked is that where a named walking route uses an (unnamed) footpath, it should remain unnamed. I've gone ahead and completed the loop based on the linked map, although it's not very detailed so if there are any errors feel free to correct. There were a few missing footpaths needed (and there are more in the general area). If you enable the public rights of way overlay they are highlighted in green (red for bridleways). Maybe that's something you would be interested in adding.
m_fuhrmann (2026-07-16 16:45:52+00:00): hey! Hast du vlt auch Details über den neuen Spielplatz?
WUSCH1463 (2026-07-16 16:48:53+00:00): ich war bei der Eröffnung und haben viele Fotos gemacht. kann also einige Spielgeräte eintragen. Aber werde erst weitermachen, wenn der Weg wieder frei ist. Den hatte ich vor Monaten gesperrt und warte (sehnsüchtig) auf die Freigabe.
m_fuhrmann (2026-07-16 16:53:33+00:00): Das wäre echt super! Fulda ist ja mittlerweile der Ort in Deutschland mit den best gemappten Spielplätzen.
user_5359 (2026-07-24 13:12:07+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1430024159. What is the mean of the tag vocation = forestry;agriculture;technical
?
Sakari_N (2026-07-24 13:47:11+00:00): Hi!

It was added by another user in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185667933

Guessing from the context, this is vocational school, and those are the trades/vocations that this school provides education for. 

I looked the wiki quickly and did not find a tagging scheme for this type of information...
user_5359 (2026-07-24 14:07:55+00:00): Upps, sorry!
NoctZan (2026-07-16 17:04:27+00:00): Changeset has wrong source, this is the correct one: https://www.bootbarn.com/stores?StoreID=1614
goedegazelle (2026-07-17 08:25:03+00:00): Als er een verkeersbord staat voor fietsers dan geeft dat ook meteen aan wat de toegang is voor snorfietsers.

G7: alleen wandelaars -> footway
G11: fietsers en snorfietsers -> cycleway + mofa=yes
G13: fietsers maar geen snorfietsers -> cycleway + mofa=no

Op een fietspad mag altijd worden gelopen tenzij ernaast een pad loopt met het bord G7.

Als het verkeersbord wordt meegenomen op OSM dan kunnen de juiste instellingen voor de toegang later alsnog worden toegevoegd.

B.v.: traffic_sign=NL:G11

G7: rond bord met symbool van wandelaar
G11: rond bord met symbool van fiets
G13: rechthoekig bord met tekst "fietspad"

De reden waarom ik hierop wijs is omdat er veel moeite voor wordt gedaan om te weten wie over welk pad iemand mag rijden. Het komt er eigenlijk op neer dat na jouw bezoek iemand anders er alsnog naartoe moet fietsen om de klus af te ronden. Jouw werk heeft dus meer effect als je ook het verkeersbord aangeeft.
LordGarySugar (2026-07-16 21:57:40+00:00): Thanks for adding this section, I have changed the tagging from highway=busway to highway=service + bus=designated in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185871133.
'busway' is more intended for a purpose-built bus-only road as part of a BRT system :)
binarytales (2026-07-17 14:11:59+00:00): Good to know. Thanks for the update. :)
guille_11 (2026-07-16 18:38:25+00:00): No estoy seguro si está bien eliminar los siguientes ways: 400533429 y 400533430 ya que todavía es una zona en la que están trabajando a diario en las obras.
Hugoren Martinako (2026-07-20 12:06:21+00:00): Según este video de Adif https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WYB-DDJIWqU, ya se ve que esa zona en obras ya no corresponde con la realidad. Sumado a las fotos que pasaste en las notas, donde los peatones pueden atravesar dichas zonas en obras.

Cuando se usa landuse=construction, dicha zona tendría que estar completamente cortada al personal ajeno a la obra.
guille_11 (2026-07-20 12:17:53+00:00): Entonces ese sería el caso del área 400533429, que actualmente está completamente vallada mientras realizan trabajos en su interior.

De todas formas lo dejo a tu criterio.
Hugoren Martinako (2026-07-20 18:03:19+00:00): Vale, entonces he recuperado https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/400533429 como landuse=construction

Elimínala una vez retiren las vallas.
guille_11 (2026-07-20 19:02:16+00:00): De acuerdo, muchas gracias por tus contribuciones.
LordGarySugar (2026-07-17 02:47:51+00:00): This changeset was reverted for the same reasons given in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185865558, an example piece of detail that was lost by unnecessary deletion and merging was the maxheight=15'0" tag on the busway beneath Crawley Green Road.
Leo Slager (2026-07-16 21:00:38+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Kees 59 (2026-07-17 06:57:57+00:00): Welkom bij OSM. Ik heb de opening_hours syntax aangepast conform de wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours. Daarnaast heb ik Ids bakkerij samengevoegd met de adres node.
badjas42 (2026-07-17 07:43:04+00:00): Dankjewel, en bedankt voor de link naar de wiki.
arjunaraoc (2026-07-17 00:22:34+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  Andhra Pradesh page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Andhra_Pradesh) and  join OSM Andhra Pradesh Telegram channel (https://t.me/osmandhra). This software requires that I review everything as either good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. 

Additional comments for resolving the issue: 
You just added a point without tags describing the point such as a tree, building etc. Satellite image just shows a plan farm land. If you have local knowledge, please add tags and update. For more info : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tags

If you can't resolve, please respond to the discussion on changeset, so that another contributor can help fix it.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185859409