piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Luzandro (2025-08-29 10:23:03+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4935638
wille (2023-06-19 14:48:08+00:00): Olá,

Muito obrigado por suas contribuições ao OpenStreetMap! Revisei essa edição e está tudo correto!

Caso tenha alguma dúvida, pode entrar em contato comigo.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137478610
Emilius123 (2023-06-18 17:02:46+00:00): Einfach der TOP G in Deutschland und immer weiter am HUSTLEN. Heftig..l

https://osmstats.neis-one.org/?item=countries&country=Germany
kubriel (2023-06-19 13:14:23+00:00): This is wrong. I dont know how to delete.
Znaika (2025-10-15 18:49:17+00:00): I will delete it
avinet_ua (2023-06-19 13:42:55+00:00): наносити військові об"єкти на мапу зараз дуже актуально?
DmVict (2023-06-22 16:16:27+00:00): Не бачу проблем. Це не закрита інформація. 
Усі відкриті джерела мають указані дані. Це те ж саме що я зробив це 2 роки назад. Тим паче, що MapboxImagery мають величезну затримку. Якраз ці пару років. 

Кому потрібна актуальна інформація про військових явно не використовує OSM і застарілі знімки.
DmVict (2023-06-22 17:15:42+00:00): Ось подібна інформація з іншої мапи
https://maps.visicom.ua/c/31.98991,47.00916,15/f/ADR3K7ZJTUJG1QP4PJ/m/u8qg8u19yk?lang=uk

А самі супутникові дані є і в Mapbox i Google i в інших сервісах.
avinet_ua (2023-06-22 18:10:38+00:00): ти щось не можеш прочитати з приводу мапінгу військових об"єктів тут https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Russian%E2%80%93Ukrainian_war

чи просто прямо по закону хочеш за малювання військових об"єктів під час війни?
DmVict (2023-06-22 18:23:58+00:00): Добре видаляй. Це на так принципово.
avinet_ua (2023-06-22 18:27:46+00:00): ти робив - ти і видали
DmVict (2023-06-22 18:30:01+00:00): Видалив, дивись останній коміт в історії
avinet_ua (2023-06-22 18:33:01+00:00): гуд
woodpeck (2023-07-14 19:03:59+00:00): Dear DmVict, this edit has been brought to the attention of the OSMF Data Working Group. The Ukrainian community would prefer not to have objects of military significance added to the map at this time and the OSMF supports this. This is an exception of course, and once the war is over we will be happy to see mappers work hand in hand to represent the truth on the ground in the map again.
DmVict (2023-07-16 16:10:41+00:00): I deleted the change
> Видалив, дивись останній коміт в історії
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-07-02 12:40:36+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10984108998/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
Joseph R P (2023-06-18 21:46:16+00:00): Fox Mill Road should not be primary, as West Ox Road or Fairfax County Parkway are much faster routes to take. Unlike Lawyers Road and Hunter Mill Road, Fox Mill Road has suitable and faster alternatives to it that run almost parallel to it.
WC392309 (2023-06-19 01:44:49+00:00): Also FCP is trunk but I would redirect the primary route to Waples Mill Road
Joseph R P (2023-06-19 14:20:48+00:00): I would eliminate a primary route along this road as a whole, since it isn't really used as a commuter route as much as the other primary roads in the area are. There can and will be secondary roads that link cities in the area that aren't tagged as primary for the sole reason that they're bypassed by/run parallel to a more significant route, the significant route in this case being Old Ox Road.
WC392309 (2023-06-19 14:38:40+00:00): I get it now. It starts with FCP(trunk) then Old Ox(primary) then Waples Mill(secondary)
_caleb (2023-06-18 14:09:44+00:00): forgot sources, survey + local knowledge + aerial imagery
CurlingMan13 (2023-06-22 05:49:37+00:00): When adding cartpaths, please use the cartpath tags instead of land access.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137480195
Matthew_Hanson (2023-06-22 13:36:21+00:00): I’m Sorry, I was just modifying what was already there. I did the other side (East side) with the same exact tags from the west side, because I’m a new mapper I was unaware of the golf cart path. I was wondering have you changed it or should I change it
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137480195
ali-14 (2023-07-01 09:11:02+00:00): سلام، روز بخیر
لطفا معابر مهم رو طبق نقشه های هوایی به روز تر اصلاح کنید. این قسمتی که دو طرفه کردید، دو لاینه و یک طرفه شده است.
Friendly_Ghost (2023-06-20 07:46:57+00:00): Hoi Padvinder,

De Oekraïense mappers hebben gevraagd of we met z'n allen willen wachten met mappen in het land tot de oorlog daar voorbij is. Zou je aub ergens anders willen mappen in de tussentijd? Zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Russian%E2%80%93Ukrainian_war voor de relevante richtlijn.

Mvg,
Casper
datendelphin (2023-06-18 18:08:07+00:00): Please don't add emojis to name tags. And don't add alt_name tags just to add a few more words.
habi (2023-06-18 20:01:44+00:00): Can you tell us what `operator:type=snc` means?
You’re the first one to introduce this to OSM: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/operator%3Atype=snc#overview
vmicho (2023-06-20 10:58:15+00:00): No idea what is that "snc".

For the alt name:
in my opinion we can keep the "BO🦊" as they gave a 🦊 in their name.
Also putting few more keywortds in alt name helps in search. E.g. right now even a naive searching of "biere oleyre" will find this ;)
habi (2023-06-20 11:30:15+00:00): > No idea what is that "snc".

*You* have added this.
Are you saying that you are deliberately adding bogus data to OpenStreetMap?
habi (2023-06-20 12:04:45+00:00): The fox is *not* in their name, but in their logo.
As https://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=🦊 shows, adding the emoji is completely pointless.
OpenStreetMap aims at reproducing the reality, putting arbitrary Biere, Beer and the Emoji into the `alt_name` key is not what this tag is meant for.
Marc_ch (2023-06-21 23:27:43+00:00): snc is "société en nom collectif", not part of the name, I already moved it into operator:type=snc
https://www.kmu.admin.ch/kmu/fr/home/savoir-pratique/creation-pme/differentes-formes-juridiques/societe-nom-collectif.html
vmicho (2023-07-01 16:52:56+00:00): Ah, then maybe it copy-pasted when i was copying the name from website :D
vmicho (2023-07-01 16:53:28+00:00): OK, lets leave it like this
MxxCon (2023-06-27 22:12:28+00:00): Based on the brand, I'm guessing it's not table tennis but https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teqball
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137480912
zhik (2023-06-27 22:28:04+00:00): TIL. I thought it was hostile architecture version of table tennis.

Also included edits from Richmond... (facepalm)
MxxCon (2023-06-27 22:31:14+00:00): ya, I was puzzled by such table when I saw one installed here on Brighton Beach. But when I googled teq branding I found that it's actually a sport
habi (2023-06-19 08:03:06+00:00): It's advisable to add the phone number of POIs in international format, to make the life of data consumers easier: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone#Usage

There are several Maproulette challenges to fix phone numbers *not* in international format: https://maproulette.org/browse/challenges?challengeSearch=&query=international%20format

Have a great day,
habi
habi (2023-06-19 08:03:37+00:00): BTW: I fixed it and added some more details in the vicinity in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137505613
vmicho (2023-07-01 16:51:07+00:00): OK thanks ;)
NorthCrab_upload (2023-06-18 14:50:21+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10984276584

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Endres Pelka (2023-06-18 15:21:31+00:00): Poprawione w 137482664
Valerio_Bozzolan (2023-07-03 13:02:29+00:00): I'm quite sure that this is the right position of the pharmacy, and not the position in front of "LàLù"
Valerio_Bozzolan (2023-07-03 13:23:46+00:00): Sorry if I created this as a duplicate of the other one - I have not noticed the other one. Maybe we should move the other one (that has nice data, but bad position IMVHO) here.
Taya_S (2023-06-19 05:00:25+00:00): Hallo Pieter,

Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Je vraagt ook om een review. Een prive pad op access=private zetten is helemaal prima!

Groeten,
Taya
Marc_ch (2023-06-22 19:20:04+00:00): Bonjour,
 les barrières ne sont pas au niveau du pont, elles sont dessus 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137660383
Salutations,
Marc
vmicho (2023-07-01 17:00:52+00:00): C'est bizarre ce mapping. Normallement c'est toujours le meme niveau que le pont - Si elles sont pas dans l'aire :D
En tout cas c'est pas routable, donc on peut teoretiquement mettre n'importe quel numero ;)
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-01-31 16:07:00+00:00): Hello!

You used
waste=trash;1
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10984289365/history

Have you maybe meant
waste=trash
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?
Piagno (2024-02-01 10:31:01+00:00): Hi Mateusz
Yes this was a typo.
Changed it.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146939917
Best regards,
Piagno
merylstreet (2023-06-19 09:16:49+00:00): Hello Snusmumriken, I just saw that all the address relations on this changeset refer to Quai de la Douane but I believe they should all be Quai Lunel (only #2 & #4 are Quai de la Douane - ref https://adresse.data.gouv.fr/base-adresse-nationale/06088_2090#17.5/43.696109/7.283845).
Cheers
Snusmumriken (2023-06-19 10:42:47+00:00): Indeed, thanks!
gscscnd (2023-06-18 16:02:33+00:00): Wartości liczbowe, np. tagu height, wpisujemy po angielsku, tzn. rolę naszego przecinka pełni kropka.
gscscnd (2023-06-18 16:03:34+00:00): access=private jest wystarczające, nie ma potrzeby dodawania pozostałych tagów z tej rodziny.
Kovoschiz (2023-06-18 17:49:24+00:00): Look, I'm one of those who started using `turning_cricle=` for the shape. So you can ask before your edits. Never edit something because wiki says so. It is not the iron rule. In the initial development, only shapes are documented to be used. This doesn't mean there is a clear wrong or unspecified usage.
Kovoschiz (2023-06-18 18:15:27+00:00): There is nothing about `turning_loop=` in the wiki either.  And now I justify myself by adding my own documentation. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Roundabout_details#Turning_circles_and_loops
Kovoschiz (2023-06-18 17:50:54+00:00): Also you are destroying information as although these `=turning_loop` are separately drawn now, they aren't shown to be one.
Kovoschiz (2023-06-18 17:51:28+00:00): So unless you can provide an alternative to show this explicitly, this is not a productive edit.
Kartoit (2023-06-18 19:55:17+00:00): Ihan mielenkiinnosta millä perusteella olet merkinnyt kaikki keskustan jalkakäytävät pyöräteiksi? Keskustassa on vain yksi eroteltu jalkakäytävä/pyörätie ja muutamia yhdistettyjä väyliä, mutta ei yhtäkään pelkkää pyörätietä. Suurimmalla  osalla (noin 80-90%) kaduista pyöräillään ajoradalla ja reunoilla on vain jalkakäytävät.
ssundell (2023-06-20 20:54:48+00:00): Moi! Tuo Nurmenpolku näyttää hiukan erikoiselta, kun asuinkaduksi merkitylle tienpätkälle ei ole ilmeisesti yhtään laillista ajoreittiä? Digiroad-aineistossa Nurmenpolku näyttäisi olevan merkitty pyörätieksi.
tv0 (2023-06-23 06:56:34+00:00): Vaikuttaa olevan vähän kaksipiippuinen juttu. Virallisesti se on pyörätie, mutta kyllä siinä jonkin verran autolla ajetaan. Uskoisin että asukkaat menevät Nurmenpolulle tuolta kerrostaloalueen läpi menevän tien kautta, joka on myös pelastustie.
tv0 (2023-06-23 07:15:57+00:00): Tein hieman muokkauksia alueeseen.
ssundell (2023-06-25 12:42:21+00:00): Sinälläänhän sillä, ajetaanko siellä (laittomasti) autolla, ei ole OSM:n kannalta merkitystä, koska karttaan pitäisi laittaa se, mikä on lain mukaan tilanne.

Tämä ei tietysti ole aivan ongelmatonta, koska joissakin kaupungeissa on esimerkiksi jänniä ajatuksia sen suhteen, miten pyörätiet pitää merkitä...
GCerretani (2023-10-01 12:43:05+00:00): Parte di Piazza Giovanni Amendola modificata in una inesistente Viale Amendola.
map per (2023-06-18 19:26:23+00:00): Hallo Kithoras Carzyl,

die Toilette und der Tante Emma Laden waren auf OpenSteetMaps schon eingezeichnet. Hab die duplikate bereinigt.

Viele Grüße
map per

PS: Maps.me ist für das Bearbeiten von OSM nicht geeignet. Ich würde den ID Editor empfehlen (vgl. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ID).
Hufkratzer (2023-06-18 18:02:28+00:00): Hi, gibt's irgend einen speziellen Grund den Reitplatz https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/440227429 nicht als leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian zu taggen wie die anderen Reitplätze auch? Z.B.:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/440223592
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/442230562
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/441925881
KaiPankrath (2023-12-17 13:49:11+00:00): Nein. Fokus war einfach ganz woanders, da war ich schlicht unaufmerksam. Danke für den Hinweis.
zorglubu (2023-06-20 13:08:52+00:00): Bonjour,
Merci pour vos contributions.
Je me permets de supprimer de supprimer l'attribut guest_house=chambre_d'hôtes qui n'existe pas dans OSM. De plus les attributs sauf les noms sont toujours en anglais.

Bonne continuation sur OSM :-)
mapperue (2023-08-06 09:45:22+00:00): Robíš neskutočne veľa chýb pri mapovaní.
Tento objekt bol pôvodne budova. Ak už tam nestojí tak sa tento objekt vymaže a neprepisuje sa na parkovisko, ktoré tam stojí teraz.
Takto tam ostali značky ako building:material=wood, čo je nezmysel.
vladosaro (2023-08-06 10:14:00+00:00): ospravedlnujem sa  a prosim o opravu
user_5359 (2023-06-20 10:03:58+00:00): Hello! Please take a look on http://www.osm.org/node/4317014041. What ist the mean of the tag panoramax = 6e32362c-b45f-4c5b-8d85-58be1986c03d. What is the source and license of this information?
cquest (2023-06-20 11:03:39+00:00): As mentionned, it is a test to see how we can link OSM object with corresponding pictures in the Panoramax project (see https://panoramax.fr).

Source is panoramax.openstreetmap.fr, licence is Licence Ouverte (like CC-BY).
Baloo Uriza (2024-12-11 14:33:13+00:00): Don't forget to update or remove source:maxspeed when changing the speed limit.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137484228
habi (2023-06-19 07:51:16+00:00): Ciao vmicho

It's great for pedestrian routing that you're adding sidewalks adjacent to the streets.
If you do this, it is advisable though to add a `separate`-sidewalk tag to the street, as specified on the OSM Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sidewalk#Separately_mapped_sidewalks
Can you update the streets you've edited in your recent changesets with `sidewalk:both=separate`?

Greetings,
habi
vmicho (2023-07-01 16:48:24+00:00): Hi
I do not see any benefit of that. Any routing SW will navigate through path first. And the sidewalk tag is more useful for actually telling there *is* a sidewalk than to say there *is not*. i.e. it is more use ful to map thigs that exist :|
Koreller (2023-06-18 16:26:30+00:00): Source : - https://kkfonline.com/2022/07/17/pyongyang-international-football-school/
- https://exploredprk.com/sport/pyongyang-international-football-school/
map per (2023-06-18 19:19:20+00:00): Hallo domoni,

und wilkommen bei OpenStreetMaps!

du beim Klinikum Schwabing leider die Kathegorie von Krankenhaus zu einem nichtssagendem area=yes geändert. Hab das wieder korrigiert.

Und bist du dir sicher, dass das Krankenhaus keine Notaufnahme (emergency=no) hat?

Viele Grüße
map per
Ahmad-0772 (2023-06-18 18:33:51+00:00): Please undo this road name change
silversurfer83 (2023-06-19 16:22:04+00:00): Hallo

ich habe Dir / Euch schon öfter geschrieben. Leider wird es nicht wirklich besser.
"somme corrections,..." und "survey" sind keine zufriedenstellenden Kommentare und eine Quelle für die Änderung fehlt auch wieder.
Unabhängig von der Anzahl der Änderungen die dieser account jeden Tag einbringt sind das zwei wichtige Dinge, die bitte beachtet werden sollen. Allein aus Rücksicht auf andere NutzerInnen hier.
Danke.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137487013
moje_konto (2023-08-29 00:58:24+00:00): Tak, ale niekoniecznie warto pojedynczo usuwać - miejsca stacji zagospodarowano na hulajnogi.

Najlepiej poszukać o nowym systemie i uaktualnić całość.
Supaplex (2023-09-23 14:37:47+00:00): Why do you remove the name of the bridge relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15989435/history ?
Supaplex (2023-09-23 14:38:34+00:00): This changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137487253
Supaplex (2023-09-23 14:38:53+00:00): Why do you remove the bridge area name?
Ottonormalverbraucher (2023-09-24 11:01:06+00:00): Hello Supaplex, the relation 15989435 you complain about only describes the outer border of the bridge. The bridge itself is roads etc. is described in relation 15989435. The name of the bridge also belongs to this matter. Best regards, Ottonormalverbraucher
Kovoschiz (2023-06-30 13:20:04+00:00): Please don't add non-existent settlements.
arcanma (2023-06-20 09:00:07+00:00): Simone, innanzitutto benvenuto in OpenStreetMap.
Vedo che sono le tue prime modifiche, mi sembra che il tuo intento principale era segnalare la direzione "Ravenna" sulla E45 a Ponte S. Giovanni. Per quello si usa l'etichetta [destination](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:destination) mettendo come valori quanto riportato sui segnali, nei nomi degli oggetti si mette solo il nome proprio, altre informazioni non sono efficaci perché i software non le interpretano.
Nelle tue modifiche hai poi inavvertitamente cancellato il ponte sul Tevere, interrompendo la E45, se hai segnalazioni di errore quando salvi le modifiche ricontrolla il lavoro ed eventualmente non proseguire con il salvataggio chiudendo la pagina per evitare di arrecare danni alla mappa. Grazie
zorglubu (2023-06-20 11:50:21+00:00): Bonjour waterced,
Tu as ajouté une vingtaine de nœuds highway=road en utilisant fix-josm d'osmose. Et Josm les signale à juste titre en erreur.
exemple : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10984628566

Pour info, le plus simple est d'afficher dans Josm le calque Imagerie>carte>BD Topo pour pouvoir supprimer ce nœud et le remplacer par le tracé de voie manquante.
Merci ;-)
waterced (2023-06-20 21:44:15+00:00): Bien vu! J'ai utilisé la télécomande josm mais je n'avais pas fait attention à ces noeuds automatiquement importés. Je serais attentif à l'avenir :)
zorglubu (2023-06-21 09:09:37+00:00): Pour nettoyer, je suis allé les rechercher avec overpass : j'en ai finalement trouvé 150 entre Nantes et Les Herbiers, et vers St Hilaire.
C'est bon, j'ai tout viré. ;-)
Commodoortje (2023-08-12 18:48:42+00:00): Hoi Blackstonel,
Een nieuwe mapper attendeerde erop dat de rotonde inmiddels voor verkeer is geopend, we hebben hem een beetje geholpen.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139410574#map=18/52.03790/5.67031&layers=N
Commodoortje (2023-08-12 18:49:42+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139407112#map=19/52.03855/5.67117&layers=N
archpdx (2023-06-21 22:00:11+00:00): Hi,
Why did you remove crosswalks such as (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9764621855) and (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9764491130)?
archpdx (2023-06-21 22:04:05+00:00): These two crosswalks seem to still exist in aerial imagery from 2022
MxxCon (2023-06-27 22:18:17+00:00): Hello.
If a business closed, instead of outright deleting its node, which destroys this object's history and makes that address unsearchable, it's much better to use lifecycle prefixes as documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

Or at the very least delete biz-specific tags but leave the address node in place.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137488798
Totor (2023-12-06 05:26:32+00:00): Hi krameels25,
I'm currently trying to close some notes in Bantayan, and stumbled on your view-point.
Could you tell me what this viewpoint is exactly ?
I saw several edits with home, the address... but it looks like a weird location for a view point.
archpdx (2023-06-21 21:49:18+00:00): Hi, what is the source for this road name:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/502264080
user_19307445 (2023-06-24 14:36:34+00:00): There is a sign at the intersection of this road and Hastings that says "Almogelo Circle"
Bear-in-a-box (2023-09-18 12:21:52+00:00): Hello, 
the path you created is cutting through the fenced-off nature reserve area.
Thierry1030 (2023-09-18 14:02:57+00:00): ok thanks for your message. I will correct this evening ...
Thierry1030 (2023-09-18 14:35:46+00:00): remark/question: is the outline/geometry of the fence correctly mapped?
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=391044186346146
Thierry1030 (2023-09-21 05:17:17+00:00): I saw that you corrected the geometry of the fence. Thanks!
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1105712499/history
NorthCrab_upload (2023-06-18 19:10:14+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8765188456
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1005914538

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Jvitegem (2023-11-12 14:42:21+00:00): Beste Sander,
Waarom heb jij de garageboxen aan Globe 14 , Hulst er in getekend?
Er is in 2022 een bouwvergunning af gegeven maar verder is er nog niks....
Wij tekenen gebouwen pas in als de bouw gestart is.
Sander H (2023-11-12 15:02:17+00:00): Tja, volgens de BAG is de bouw gestart in mei en vorige week gereedgemeld. Op satelietdataportaal zie ik op de beelden van aug nog helemaal niks en sept zijn er geen beelden van, dus mogelijk dat de gemeente dit fout heeft gedaan. Neem aan dat je constatering ook voor 8, 10 en 12 geldt? Doe jij dan een terugmelding of zal ik dat doen?
Jvitegem (2023-11-12 20:17:26+00:00): Hoi Sander,
Ik had niet gezien dat deze gebouwen op "Gereed" staan.
Ik ben er vanmiddag langsgereden en er stond alleen een bord "Bouwgrond" te koop.
Ik heb al een BAG melding gemaakt.
Jvitegem (2023-11-13 09:02:57+00:00): De BAG beheerder van de gemeente HULST heeft gereageerd...
Het was een foutje....
De BAG is inmiddels aangepast.
Ik heb de gebouwen in OSM weer verwijderd.
mapperue (2024-02-29 23:00:08+00:00): Hi, goods conveyor
is tagged as man_made=goods_conveyor.
See more here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dgoods_conveyor
A pipeline is used to transport liquid or gaseous materials.
So i changed your edit to conveyor.
zitta (2024-03-04 16:23:43+00:00): While I was adding tags to abandoned railways, I didn't notice the incorrect man_made=pipeline from user_2735. Good that you noticed and corrected it
rempshaener (2023-06-19 14:52:33+00:00): Hallo,
du hast in den Kommentar zu deiner Änderung "dieser Weg ist zu gefährlich, als das man irgend jemandem empfehlen sollte den mit dem Rad zu benutzen." geschrieben.
Davon abgesehen, dass das vorherige Tagging auch nicht ganz richtig war, ist deine Änderung natürlich auch nicht wirklich sauber.
Ich würde das entsprechend wieder rückgängig machen wollen.
Was genau war/ist dort so gefährlich?
Viele Grüße