piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
jeslop (2023-01-10 10:27:15+00:00): Hola Aaron_SENER, bienvenido a OSM. ¿Hay alguna razón para que hayas cambiado una zona de bosque a edificio? 
Lo que llamas zonas de calistenia no parece un parque, quizás https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:leisure%3Dfitness_station se adapta mejor. El nombre es descriptivo, por lo tanto va mejor en la etiqueta description=

Saludos

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
Aaronhpa (2023-01-10 10:43:13+00:00): Buenos dias Jesús. Totalmente de acuerdo, no ví la opción de fitness_station y parque era lo que más se acercaba. De todas formas esa zona es un parque, anteriormente era un parque para niños, pero tras caer en desuso y degradarse se hizo una inversión para transformarlo en una zona de calistenia que, actualmente, tiene un uso continuado por parte de diversas personas de la localidad(Si bien es cierto que no sé la cantidad). 
Puede que haya cometido algún error más de input, quería probar con un punto que vi vacío en mi ciudad y que tenía clara su situación actual.
jeslop (2023-01-10 15:28:16+00:00): No hay problema. He hecho los cambios y recuperado el bosque que convertiste en edificio.
Si estás interesado en seguir mapeando puedes leer esto como introducción: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Gu%C3%ADa_de_principiantes

Saludos

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
DaanLT (2023-01-10 12:21:08+00:00): nereikėjo Žirmūnų žiedo ir aplink vėl atkeisti pagal seną orto, yra gi nauja 2022 vasaros ir pagal tai jau buvo sužymėta
Litawor (2023-01-10 12:50:26+00:00): Gal ir persistengiau truputį. Orto atrodė pakankamai šviežia.
DaanLT (2023-01-10 16:24:18+00:00): Nieko baisaus, atkursiu vėliau
abakus_uploader (2023-01-10 23:59:07+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
NorthCrab (2023-01-10 15:09:25+00:00): Proszę używaj lepszych opisów zmian niż "yes", nie wiadomo o co chodzi ani co zmieniłeś
mavl (2023-04-25 09:07:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
eggie (2023-01-10 10:45:10+00:00): Dag Gijsbert... Waarom access=no hier.
Dat betekent Verboden Toegang.
Access combinaties met access=no zijn bijna altijd fout.
Kijk je nog even?

Mvg
Eggie
eggie (2023-01-10 11:04:20+00:00): access=no heb ik verwijderd
Routeren voor fietsers doet het maar tot de dwarsweg Valettastraat. Is dat wellicht ook bicycle=yes?

MVG
eggie
Gijsbert Voskamp (2023-01-12 13:55:20+00:00): Yes, volgens mij klopt hij dan zo.
mavl (2023-04-25 09:04:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
tux67 (2023-01-10 10:17:44+00:00): Source war:  Geobasis NRW (v)DOP; Maxar
Carlos Brys (2023-01-10 12:51:02+00:00): Gracias por tu contribución a los datos de OSM.
Hice un par de ajustes a tu edición para darle más precisión a los datos.
mike140 (2023-01-10 13:48:22+00:00): Зображення не відкривається - можливо некоректне посилання
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:47:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
BCNorwich (2023-01-10 11:01:21+00:00): Hi,
Section 30(1) of the Countryside Act 1968 gives the public the right to ride a bicycle on any bridleway but, in exercising that right, cyclists must give way to pedestrians and persons on horseback. Section 30(4) provides that section 30(1) shall not affect any definition of “bridleway” in the Countryside Act 1968 or any other Act.

30 Riding of pedal bicycles on bridleways.

(1)Any member of the public shall have, as a right of way, the right to ride a bicycle, [F1not being a mechanically propelled vehicle], on any bridleway, but in exercising that right cyclists shall give way to pedestrians and persons on horseback.

(2)Subsection (1) above has effect subject to any orders made by a local authority, and to any byelaws.

(3)The rights conferred by this section shall not affect the obligations of the highway authority, or of any other person, as respects the maintenance of the bridleway, and this section shall not create any obligation to do anything to facilitate the use of the bridleway by cyclists.

(4)Subsection (1) above shall not affect any definition of “bridleway” in this or any other Act.

So to state a use bicycle=yes is correct, but to state, bicycle=designated would not necessarily be correct as the original Highways Act did not designate cycling on a bridleway.


Your reference to NT activities seems to be a proposal of guidance by the landowner only, and is not based on law.

Regards Bernard.
mavl (2023-04-25 09:07:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
BCNorwich (2023-01-10 11:06:08+00:00): Hi, A bicycle does not have a designated use status on a designated public footpath.
Tomas Straupis (2023-02-01 07:08:57+00:00): Tai nėra Mokyklos gatvė. Mokyklos gatvė jau yra pažymėta šiauriau.
Dr-Amjad (2023-01-25 14:54:57+00:00): مجمع اعمال يقع بالقرب من المدينة الطبية
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:54:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SekeRob (2023-01-11 07:42:23+00:00): Some tag corrections to you Co POI to and buildings/driveway added.

ciao
Dimitar155 (2023-01-10 15:03:49+00:00): There is an "end of motorway" sign right before the tunnel towards Sofia.  I'm not sure what other way there is to represent it.
foreigner037 (2023-01-10 16:16:20+00:00): Speed limit, lanes, and access are all adequate. If anything, having a 400m section in the middle of a 400km motorway makes no sense, especially only in one lane. Plus, the distance markers and road signs are in green. I don't know why they insisted on putting end of motorway sings when a speed limit would've sufficed. It's all part of the A2 motorway anyway.
foreigner037 (2023-01-10 16:22:49+00:00): You've probably met me here and on the wiki and have hopefully seen that I try to be as objective as possible and change something only if there is proof of that. I think this is one of the exceptions we should make for consistency's sake. The road situation is not very clear on this anyway.
Dimitar155 (2023-01-10 16:34:47+00:00): I've met you in the wiki and I see what you have done both here and there (great work by the way).

The only problem that I've seen is that you haven't contacted the mapper to let him know about his mistake (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/130800831). The same happened with you and user/MariaPetrova about the start of Hemus near Sofia a few months ago which led to a "tagging war". It's a good idea to comment on other mapper's changeset if you see something wrong or if you disagree with their choice of tags. Also keep in mind that most mappers don't check the history of elements and they won't know why their changeset was reverted if you don't write a comment on their changeset.
foreigner037 (2023-01-10 16:39:05+00:00): You are right about this particular case. Regarding the user MariaPetrova, I have contacted her multiple times, but it was via private messages as that was where she contacted me first.
Dimitar155 (2023-01-10 17:38:44+00:00): Looking at the history, she changed it 3 times to non motorway and you changed it back 3 times. There was no sign of communication. Either way, the problem is resolved. Just make sure to leave a comment on the respective changeset when you see something wrong in the future.
foreigner037 (2023-01-10 18:13:09+00:00): Yeah, noted.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:13:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:10:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
Linkid (2023-01-10 12:41:16+00:00): Note associée: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2488035
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:27:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:23:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
ToniE (2023-01-10 14:43:17+00:00): Hi hix,

das Tagging scheint hier ziemlich kaputt zu sein:

- vehicle = delivery

- motor_vehicle = yes

- bus = yes

==> alle nicht motorisierten Fahrzeuge dürfen hier nur liefern?

Die Beschilderung vor Ort ist tatsächlich 'krank'

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=48.051340699972&lng=11.605245699972&z=17&pKey=373503841270519&focus=photo&x=0.7270526127370086&y=0.5334540637428817&zoom=1.2544247787610618

eventuell bus=yes durch psv=yes (Linienverkehr) ersetzen?

VG
Toni
hix (2023-01-10 15:37:37+00:00): Hi Toni,
psv kannte ich nicht ...
hab den bus rausgenommen und wie vorgeschlagen durch pv ersetzt. 
Die Schilderkombi is wirklich schräg, letzendlich ist es ein 'beliebiger Lieferverkehr und ansonsten nur Fahrrad/E-Bike, KfZ und Linie'. D.h. auch Pferdekutschen wenn sie liefern :-)
Grüße, Hix
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:35:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
FraukeLeo (2025-04-28 05:11:04+00:00): Hi SaschaDepunkt, das ist jetzt aber nicht wirklich der Name des Weges, oder? ;-)
Glassman (2023-01-13 18:48:28+00:00): Please save and upload your edit before moving to a distant location.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131106296
Glassman (2023-01-13 18:50:14+00:00): #TIP: address tags should be entered with separate tag for each element of the address, for example addr:housenumber=21702 and addr:street=Colt Road. also include the postal city with addr:city.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131106755
Syl (2023-01-10 16:26:08+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai supprimé le point que vous avez créé, merci de ne créer que des choses qui existent réellement.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-06-01 09:08:32+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/127265044/history has roof = gabled that was added in this edit
Maybe roof:shape=gabled was intended here?

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof
ticki_52 (2025-06-01 09:49:53+00:00): You are right- input mistake.  See #167042278
t_ja (2023-01-10 17:06:25+00:00): Ahoj,
na základe čoho bol odmazaný tag bicycle=yes? Podľa webu SCK tadeto stále vedie CZT 5443, a ešte pár rokov dozadu boli informačné cedule pripevnené na smerovníku KST: https://backend.freemap.sk/gallery/pictures/64941/image

Ak už má aj SCK vlastný smerovník, treba zaznačiť aj ten. A ak ho tam stále nemá, tak je stav pravdepodobne taký, ako na fotke vyššie a teda úprava v tejto sade zmien nezodpovedá skutočnosti.
user_5359 (2023-01-11 08:40:07+00:00): Hello! Please notice your typo. Use surface instead of sarface. I will correct this.
Rogoyski (2023-01-31 21:23:06+00:00): To był duplikat. Proszę o sprawdzanie.
eggie (2023-01-10 15:45:17+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Tip.. Operator hoort niet op een halte. 
Een website altijd beginnen met 	https://www.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=131108387
MVG
eggie


MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-01-10 15:57:59+00:00): website aangepast naar https://roei.arzv.nl/

key operator verwijderd van bushalte.

e-mail geeft geen response. 

MVG
eggie
Gr eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:02:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:09:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:06:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:06:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
Syl (2023-01-10 16:28:19+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai annulé votre modification.
Toutes les modifications sont directement appliquées dans la base de données. Merci de ne pas l'utiliser pour faire des tests ou pour jouer.
Krzysztofszewczyk (2023-01-10 14:40:30+00:00): Thanks for update mate!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:10:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:03:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:03:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
Filip009 (2023-07-06 06:17:43+00:00): Ahoj, nemyslím, že tieto wikidata Q67464688 patria na cyklosmerovník. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9904071461/history
Tomas_J (2023-07-06 06:35:54+00:00): Ahoj. Mám dať subject:Wikidata alebo zmazať ?
Tomas_J (2023-07-06 06:41:23+00:00): ...pozerám že aj na nejakych potokoch tam mám Wikidata na stream namiesto na relácii. Prejdem to cca o týzden a opravim.
Filip009 (2023-07-06 06:54:51+00:00): Možno by bolo vytvoriť nejaký nový bod natural saddle a dať to na ten priamo
Tomas_J (2023-07-06 07:10:15+00:00): ...na to nemám ale dost času nformacii od stola - zase bude niekto písať že je to zle.
Tomas_J (2023-07-11 09:25:18+00:00): Zmenil som wikidata a wikipedia na subject:wikidata a subject:wikipedia.
drixomanbeta (2023-04-16 00:21:28+00:00): This should be still under 甘南县 and not under Beijing even though the name suggest otherwise.

For reference: http://www.stats.gov.cn/sj/tjbz/tjyqhdmhcxhfdm/2022/23/02/230225.html
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-07-04 10:01:01+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3764756 ?
Tomas_J (2023-07-04 12:50:15+00:00): HI, I Changed Wikidata brand prefix from international mother to the brand of the national branch.
eggie (2023-01-10 15:50:16+00:00): Dag pepperop.
accesstags zijn lastig. ... 
Tip  access=no icm andere accesstags is bijna altijd fout.
Dat zal er vast afkunnen.
foot en bicycle=yes is default op wegen.. Dat hoef je niet toe te voegen.
highway=footway zal haast niet. Dat is bv een wandelpad in een park of bebouwde kom met een G7 bord.
Dus hier highway=path gebruiken. 
foot=yes mag  wel op een path (Op een footway is het default) 

MVG
eggie
osmdees (2023-02-17 08:12:30+00:00): hast du noch mehr St. in Sankt umbenannt? Du änderst fälschlicherweise damit die richtige Schreibweise wie ich dir in dem anderen changeset mitgeteilt habe.

Auszug aus dem wiki

> If the name is incorrect when spelled in full, however, do not falsely expand it. (For example: Wilts & Berks Canal, British placenames beginning with "St", Invalid abbreviation expansion) If modifying a name creates ambiguity (for instance, by local convention St. John's is in Newfoundland, while Saint John is in New Brunswick) it's best to keep the local usage intact.

> The name "Cedar St" on a sign, which is abbreviated to save space, should be completed to Cedar Street, but the name John F. Kennedy Boulevard is not expanded to John Fitzgerald Kennedy Boulevard in English speaking countries, since the shorter version is the common spelling and pronunciation. With some (academic) titles in names the abbreviated version is also the most commonly spelled version.
skyper (2023-02-17 13:32:51+00:00): Aber St. wird doch eben Sankt ausgesprochen und ist eine Abkürzung. Auch gibt es keine Verwechslungen. Das einzige was ich eventuell falsch gemacht habe ist kein `short_name=` zusätzlich zu setzen. Darauf werde ich in Zukunft achten.
Siehe auch https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/4664
eggie (2023-01-10 15:41:09+00:00): Dag pepperop.. Beter geen name=..  gebruiken om iets te omschrijven. Gebruik evt. ..description=..
Mvg
Eggie
eggie (2023-01-10 22:21:44+00:00): Aangepast naar description opv name=
Gr eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-10 15:41:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 131112045 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed deletion of https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5441968
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-10 15:41:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 131112045 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed deletion of https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5441968
canfe (2023-01-11 17:33:54+00:00): Il nome è davvero fontana? Lo chiedo perché è mappata come sorgente (e dal luogo ci sta che non sia una fontanella [non fontana])
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131111806
felipeeugenio (2023-01-10 17:45:04+00:00): Hola. Qué están haciendo en Diagonal Las Termas? está entera cerrada?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131111982
salve100 (2023-01-12 22:39:17+00:00): se estan pavimentando las calles y se esta trabajando en una interseccion con almirante latorre
felipeeugenio (2023-01-12 23:07:20+00:00): Ok. Gracias
Or favor atento a cuando abran.
Saludos
osmviborg (2023-01-10 16:05:43+00:00): 'Mapping parking spaces is an addition, not a replacement, to mapping a whole parking lot with amenity=parking'
antonr (2023-01-10 19:05:32+00:00): Tak for input! Nåede selv at fange den via dette glimrende værktøj, der endda forstår tidsbegrænsede P-betingelser :-)
antonr (2023-01-10 19:07:29+00:00): https://zlant.github.io/parking-lanes
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-10 15:41:58+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 131111158, 131111512.
Hufkratzer (2023-01-10 21:18:23+00:00): Hi, why did you retag https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/985525827 from leisure=pitch to leisure=horse_riding ? It looks like a riding arena (typical size), and according to the wiki riding arenas should be tagged as pitches, compare
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=pitch#Riding_arena
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=horse_riding
chris_debian (2023-01-11 10:36:48+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for your message. I looked at the Wiki page, but must have misinterpreted it. I'll revert the change today, when I'm out of meetings.

Thanks, again.

Chris
Hufkratzer (2023-01-11 13:55:58+00:00): Feel free to improve the wiki if it is unclear.
woodpeck (2023-04-13 10:44:05+00:00): In this changeset you re-introduced the "aeroway=aerodrome" tag for the Moore Army Airfield, even though a note on the object says it is NOT an airfield any more but instead used for police training. Please either remove the aeroway=aerodrome tag which indicates an active airfield, or fix the note tag if this is not abandoned any more.
Ktr101 (2023-04-15 12:45:36+00:00): Thank you for the note, as I went ahead and did so yesterday. Happy Editing!
bxl-forever (2023-01-10 20:53:33+00:00): Hello,

If this is just the garden at the back of a house, you should better add access=private + garden:type=residential.

Otherwise, it will be assimilated to a public garden.  People sometimes query OsmAnd or other apps to look for the nearest garden for a walk.

Hope this helps.
Tom Ameye (2023-01-11 07:06:52+00:00): This certainly helps. Thanks for the tip which I will take up going forward.
GerdP (2023-01-10 17:14:04+00:00): Moin!
Hatte gerade ein paar Konflikte mit meinem Upload und Deinen Updates. Bitte schau noch mal, ob alles so geblieben ist, wie es sein soll.
hmkaiser (2023-01-11 06:17:24+00:00): Guten Morgen,
habe mir auch deine Edits an der Stelle noch einmal angesehen und keine Kollisionen erkannt. 
Die durch meine Trennung entstandenen 2 großen Forest-Einzelflächen, links und rechts der A29, müssten Multipolygone sein, weil sich innerhalb der beiden Flächen jeweils weitere landuse/natural befinden.
Ich vermeide das direkte Koppeln benachbarter Flächen. weil sich dadurch die spätere Pflege, z.B. wenn aus orchard farmland werden sollte, deutlich erschwert.