piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Glassman (2024-01-31 18:27:43+00:00): Why did you remove the address? Was it incorrect?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146727872
Glassman (2024-01-31 19:03:36+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

Please don't remove addresses unless they are wrong. If they are wrong, please correct them.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146727872
Glassman (2024-01-31 19:03:37+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

Please don't remove addresses unless they are wrong. If they are wrong, please correct them.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146727872
Glassman (2024-01-31 18:58:25+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

Please don't remove addresses unless they are wrong. If they are wrong, change it to the correct address. I'm going to add the address back.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146728057
topius (2024-01-27 07:41:00+00:00): Hi. I saw you corrected this name. According to the PNG Census Register, this village is written as Asinave. I added your suggestion Asinuwa as an alternate name.
Glassman (2024-01-31 18:37:48+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146728201
Glassman (2024-01-31 18:38:19+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146728316
Glassman (2024-01-31 18:54:21+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

You removed the address. I'm going to add the address back.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146728663
Glassman (2024-01-31 18:53:27+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146728681
Glassman (2024-01-31 18:52:39+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146728701
MxxCon (2024-02-04 06:24:09+00:00): These look like semi-detached buildings or even apartments rather than terraced(row houses).
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146728731
Allison P (2024-02-04 16:22:24+00:00): I agree that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1243330356 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1243330357 are semi-detached
questfinder (2024-02-04 16:35:01+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building=terrace

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dsemidetached_house
MxxCon (2024-02-04 16:38:53+00:00): Yes, and at least 2 of these buildings have only 2 address nodes on them, meaning it's actually just 2 semi-detached buildings. And other buildings do not look like townhouses.
questfinder (2024-02-04 16:50:00+00:00): If they have their own entrance, they are classified as such.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building=terrace
MxxCon (2024-02-04 17:00:24+00:00): Read your own wiki link to building=semidetached_house!🤦‍♂️
questfinder (2024-02-04 17:03:34+00:00): I read the wiki; that's why I mentioned it.
NeisBot (2024-01-27 10:48:32+00:00): revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146695309
NeisBot (2024-01-27 10:48:39+00:00): Thanks kechan!
ForestFurnace (2024-01-29 04:15:43+00:00): I don't know why Vernon Township are being such haters about who's riding their pump track, but most pump tracks seem to allow skateboards, scooters and rollerblades.
afgb1977 (2025-02-16 22:16:52+00:00): Hello
Can you please indicate if the source used for this CS is an OSM compatible source?
There are more precise sources provided by Colombia en Mapas, IGAC, and the POT of each municipality and department.
Why did you use one related to monitoring illicit crops if they don't exist in this area?
Is it some kind of stigmatization or something similar?
At what point did you consult the OSM community in Colombia about your mechanical editions?
If you consulted the Colombian OSM community, who did you speak to? Is there evidence of the consultation carried out?
Jordi MF (2024-01-28 10:32:40+00:00): Hola MikelCalo,

He corregit el nom d'un centre educatiu perquè oficialment és Col·legi d'Educació Primària encara que hagen col·locat un cartell nou a l'exterior. He mantingut el nom Col·legi d'Educació Públic com a alt_name (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146772839). Açò ocorrerà en la majoria de centres educatius perquè fa uns pocs anys es van col·locar eixos cartells, però no són els noms oficials.

Salutacions i enhorabona per tot el treball fet a València,
Jordi
MikelCalo (2024-01-28 12:00:53+00:00): Hola Jordi MF,

Moltes gràcies, ho tindré en compte per a altres centres.

Salutaciones
emersonveenstra (2024-02-10 17:35:54+00:00): Hi there,

Why did you add "height=1e+100" to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1243331841?
Allison P (2024-02-10 20:01:56+00:00): Because this user is a known vandal
emersonveenstra (2024-02-12 13:26:11+00:00): Oh, i missed the block. I'll fix it
NieWnen (2026-06-21 21:05:38+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5270329
Glassman (2024-01-31 18:48:49+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

You removed the address which hasn't changed. I'm going to revert this changeset.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146729059
Glassman (2024-01-27 03:39:52+00:00): Asking with the new shop tags, do you have new business names
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146729097
brittadamsaz69 (2024-01-27 04:41:10+00:00): The rail road does not exist. And the owner of the property wants the listed roads removed
citrula (2024-01-27 16:59:54+00:00): Is w/1243338027 really a park?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146729835
NieWnen (2024-03-31 17:16:06+00:00): Proszę nie twórz niepołączonych ścieżek tak jak tutaj: 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1243340119

One niczemu nie służą, bo nie można nimi nawigować – to błąd. Ścieżki powinny być łączone z innymi oraz drogami.

Od Andriollego już był otagowany ciąg pieszo-rowerowy, dodatkowy chodnik obok jest zbędny.

Zachęcam do zajrzenia na wiki w dział Rowery: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Rowery#Drogi_dla_pieszych_i_rower%C3%B3w
Warin61 (2024-01-29 00:23:07+00:00): Hi,
The multipolygon relation is not 'correct'. The role 'inner' cannot touch a role 'outer'. 

To me it looks like the red roof is one building ... then the other structure is ??? For the moment I have used the same tags on both, building=school, building:levels=2

You can check the osmwiki to see how tags are used - see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon
HobartUser (2024-02-05 07:12:02+00:00): Thank you very much for fixing that, yes it did look a bit funny.
I have updated the tags, the smaller roof is something like an amphitheater stage
John-O (2024-01-28 08:59:57+00:00): Thanks for your contribution. This node previously had some bus stop tags and was part of several relations:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1600919895

However the tags seems to have been removed from the node. If the tags are now on a different node could you update the relations please.
WestWyreWanderer (2024-01-28 13:32:24+00:00): Bus stop move was right, orphaned node removed. Thank you for pointing that out, well spotted.
WestWyreWanderer (2024-01-28 13:33:26+00:00): Moved bus stop relations restored too.
Ewen Hill (2024-01-27 03:57:48+00:00): Hi fossilised, re the review ... Firstly well spotted on finding this missing link. Everything looks great although I would remove the name of the underpass as it is redundant  and replicates the other tags you have correctly added.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146731283
Glassman (2024-01-31 18:41:56+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

I reverted this changeset. The building was already there.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146731418
Glassman (2024-01-31 18:47:36+00:00): Please use a more descriptive changeset comment. #cwugeog along with a description of the change would be appreciated.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146731450
Glassman (2024-01-31 18:46:16+00:00): While it is okay to create new tags, it often better to find an existing one. In this case metaphysical_shop has never been used. shop=metaphysical has been used 7 time. I would suggest reviewing the edit to pick an more common tag. Let me know if you need help.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146731485
Glassman (2024-01-31 18:42:40+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146731512
MxxCon (2024-02-04 06:28:40+00:00): Why did you extract perfectly valid address information from buildings and put them into separate address nodes?!
You also deleted address information from a car dealership POI. Why?

Deleting building=house also seems wrong. It's perfectly valid information and you deleted it. You made OSM data worse. This is borderline vandalism..
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146731559
gurglypipe (2024-01-27 10:02:09+00:00): Hiya, welcome to OSM and thanks for your contributions around the Wyre area recently :)

If you’re going to focus on improving alignment of things, please make sure the aerial imagery you are using is aligned to a source of ground truth first. Frustratingly, aerial imagery is not guaranteed to be aligned, and its alignment varies over time as it’s updated. It also varies across the country. In some places it can be up to 3m misaligned from (say) a GPS reading, in both directions.

The most convenient way to align the imagery is to turn on the ‘OSMUK Cadastral Parcels’ overlay in the ‘Background Settings’ panel on the right of the editor. It will turn on some thin blue lines which correspond to Land Registry parcels. Adjust the ‘Imagery Offset’ below until those lines consistently line up with obvious boundary features on the aerial imagery, such as fences or road edges. Fence junctions are particularly useful.

For example, around the west of Skippool it looks like the correct alignment offset is 0,-1.49. Note that this will be different in other places.

There’s some more information about it here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Property_extents_in_the_United_Kingdom — I’m also happy to answer questions you might have about it.

Sorry for the long comment. It seemed to me you were making a lot of alignment improvements, and I thought it would be better to tell you about this slight complication sooner rather than later!

Happy editing :)
Warin61 (2024-01-27 23:38:09+00:00): Same comment on this relation. 

Hints:
Your probably reading this via some email message ... so 
You can view the changeset on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146731774 
That gives you all the ways, relations and nodes that were entered or changed .. so you can see then there.
Then you can click on them to see each one .. such as the relation 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17086425

And so on for each thing. 

For information on tags and relations the osmwiki is a reasonable guide. See 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon#Multipolygon_created_by_only_one_polygon
Note: engage brain, the wiki reflects the view of the person who last edited it, may not be a consensus view .. if you have concerns see the discussion page - top left provides a link to it on all the osmwiki pages. 

Keep mapping.
AGrinsley (2024-01-29 06:14:13+00:00): Thanks for the heads up, I belive I've "fixed" the relation issues with: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146805978

Relations are a weird one but I think I understand them a bit better now.
ForestFurnace (2024-01-27 04:49:53+00:00): Computer crashed and lost all of my 62 changes for the park. Now redoing changes and saving in smaller increments.
MxxCon (2024-02-04 06:31:39+00:00): This edit has similar problem as the other one. You should not delete valid data from OSM unless you have a very good reason to do so!
This edit should be reverted in full.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146731875
CurlingMan13 (2024-01-27 08:41:28+00:00): Please use more detailed changeset comments.  What did you change and why?  "." doesn't tell me anything on what you did.

Thanks.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146731925
Warin61 (2024-01-27 23:18:03+00:00): The relation excludes the buildings from the nursing home... Why?
Warin61 (2024-01-29 08:05:20+00:00): Hi
Realtionships should not carry the same tags as the members ...
So building=apartments on the ways should not appear within the relation ... 
This error has been corrected.
fortera_au (2024-01-27 05:38:44+00:00): Hi, you've added the gate tags both to a node and a way, they should only exist on one of them. You also probably don't need some of the tags, especially things like opening_hours.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146732068
Norbert Dichter (2024-02-27 11:38:35+00:00): Hi, I squared and resized some 50 buildings. Please use in ID the key Q for buildings with right angles
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-27 05:10:46+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11555892002

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
nouoneq (2024-01-27 05:25:07+00:00): ERRATA, its one way road
fortera_au (2024-01-27 05:36:08+00:00): Hey, oneway shouldn't be set on here if there's no other way to get out, this would break routing further.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146732302
Warin61 (2024-01-27 23:21:58+00:00): The relation only has inners... 

Suggest delete the relation! 

Note: state, country and suburb add information can be obtained by renders from already entered data. There is no need to include it on everything.
Warin61 (2024-01-29 08:24:44+00:00): Relation deleted.
aceman444 (2024-03-08 19:16:53+00:00): Hi, you do not create a guest parking by putting the description into the 'name' tag. That is wrong in OSM. You put proper access tags onto the object. E.g. access=customers for visitors of a facility. Or access=destination which means for everyone having their destination around this parking.
access=destination was already tagged on the roads in this parking lot, so you should better look around what is already tagged, before adding conflicting tag.
Tjuro (2024-01-29 10:12:47+00:00): Hello boxie24storage,

Could you provide proof that this storage location exists?

There does not seem to be room for this.
boxie24storage (2024-01-29 12:24:20+00:00): This location is located in "Loogman tanken & wassen Aalsmeer"
Tjuro (2024-01-29 12:38:20+00:00): Ok however that is not proofing anything. This poi is placed ontop of a moving platform. i think that is it unlikely that there is any storage here.
boxie24storage (2024-01-29 12:59:37+00:00): Yes, We have a physical location at that address (Molenstraat 20, HENGELO, 7551 DC).

For proof I am attaching our CoC and VAT numbers.
Chamber of Commerce: 66059682
VAT number: NL856378884B01
fortera_au (2024-01-27 08:35:59+00:00): Hi, highways/roads (including service roads) shouldn't be mapped separately unless there's a physical separation. I don't see why there would have been issues with how it was previously mapped, and adding access=private may potentially cause more issues for routing, since it implies permission is required before going on that highway/road.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146732596
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-27 05:50:17+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11555919396

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
mavl (2024-03-23 14:38:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149053741 where the changeset comment is: The
mavl (2024-03-23 14:38:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149053741 where the changeset comment is: The
Stalker61 (2024-02-09 17:01:27+00:00): Добрый вечер. Адресация вещь нужная, но не надо ее вносить от балды. Ни один СНТ вокруг Сибиряка не входит в состав Нефтеюганска. Смотрите на полигоне СНТ правильные теги. addr:city на зданиях неуместны.
desk77 (2024-02-13 16:03:13+00:00): Добрый день.
Буду знать. Спасибо, что поправили.
woodpeck_repair (2024-02-06 23:14:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 147155096 where the changeset comment is: remove bogus mapswithme 'viewpoints'
mavl (2024-03-23 14:38:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149053741 where the changeset comment is: The
nevw (2024-01-27 10:47:34+00:00): Hi, when mapping a house in the osm you need to draw the building footprint instead of the plot boundary.
Creed5724 (2024-01-28 04:59:13+00:00): thanks, updated. 
removed area block and replaced with building footprint.
mavl (2024-03-23 14:38:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149053741 where the changeset comment is: The
nevw (2024-01-27 10:56:54+00:00): Hi, if you are not sure the Old Store Cafe is at this location or even if it exists still, there is no point in mapping it. It would be better to add a note at the location for other mappers to confirm or otherwise. The 2nd from bottom icon on the right side of the osm website will enable you to leave a note where you think it may be.
Or else you could make further enquiries until you can confirm or otherwise it existence before mapping.
nevw (2024-01-28 04:21:57+00:00): Hi
I did some searching and it looks as if the Old Store Cafe is now for short term accomodation.
I’ll change the osm to suit.

https://www.riparide.com/listings/13311-the-old-general-store-stanley-rustic-village-charm-from-a-by-gone-era

https://www.airbnb.com.au/rooms/718540783590977475?_set_bev_on_new_domain=1706415329_YTViY2Q2OWM4YTI0&source_impression_id=p3_1706415330_hMDCdhWY24Dk7qgg
NeisBot (2024-01-28 01:31:04+00:00): Hi PaulaTa 👋

your recent changeset has been marked due to a temporary or permanent block from further map edits. 

If you have any questions or if there's anything you'd like to discuss regarding the mapping, feel free to reach out! 

Best regards, 🤖

Details https://osm.org/user_blocks/15622
#ContributorHasBeenBlocked
olo81 (2024-02-16 13:11:25+00:00): To nie jest elektrociepłownia. W tym zakładzie nie produkuje się prądu. 
Nazwa do zmiany.
C2oc4 (2025-04-05 06:15:13+00:00): Jeśli dobrze czytam to jest
https://www.urcalor.pl/kategorie/ur-calor-sp-z-oo
olo81 (2025-04-05 13:55:02+00:00): Gdzie tu pisze coś o Wojkowicach? To że spółka się zajmuje produkcją prądu nie znaczy że w tym miejscu. Jak byś przeczytał co tam piszą to byś znalazł że działają w wielu miejscowościach.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-29 21:52:27+00:00): Skąd brana była przec ciebie nazwa https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/907671374/history ?
Ανδρέας Γεωργιάδης (Andreas Georgiadis) (2024-01-27 08:14:31+00:00): Translation of commit message: New point addition.
NeisBot (2024-01-28 14:31:02+00:00): Hello maxlax, thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.

Thanks!

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
maxlax (2024-01-28 14:35:52+00:00): Можно я проигнорирую ваше замечание, тем более я не вижу его дружественным, вас не должно интересовать причины и методы моих правок, и соответственноственно я не должен за них отчитываться тем более не понятно перед кем, имеете претензии создайте претензию и направьте её в русское сообщество OSM, но так по-доброму пока говорю, иди ты нахуй.
NeisBot (2024-01-29 07:19:34+00:00): Спасибо за ваш самый дружелюбный ответ. Я не ожидал, что это произойдет таким образом. Вы абсолютно уверены, что у вас очень хорошие отношения с сообществом OSM и другими картографами?
NeisBot (2024-01-29 07:52:06+00:00): Furthermore, please see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Mark D Wood (2024-01-28 19:49:51+00:00): Hi - I think you may have changed the section of this road that I had added?  I admit to being new to this forum so may have something wrong.  However, the map as is is a bit erroneous.  Hilltop Dr is a privately maintained (HOA) road, but it does indeed have two spurs.  I added the second spur in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146730407.  

I had also tried to shorten the southern spur of Hilltop Dr as the last part is really a driveway.

What is in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/13189642 is accurate except that Hilltop Dr should also be extended to the west as I had tried to do.

Again, this was my first time trying to submit an edit so I may have done something wrong, please let me know if that is the case.

(BTW, I live on Hilltop Dr)
CurlingMan13 (2024-01-28 19:55:18+00:00): I left the spurs, but added in (2) private driveways to the ends to connect to the houses.

Roads can be privately maintained, but with no barriers, traffic isn't restricted.  Generally, HOA roads are tagged as privately owned, and unless there are barriers, like a gate, set with access=yes.
Mark D Wood (2024-01-28 20:20:03+00:00): okay, that's good, thanks for the updates.

I see a way to mark access, but I don't see a tag to mark the road as privately owned/maintained --- how is that done?
Bienson (2024-01-28 04:13:56+00:00): Solange das Ladenlokal noch existiert, ist es eigentlich ganz schön, den POI-Node als disused:amenity oder disused:shop stehen zu lassen, damit bei Neubezug das Geschäft schneller eingetragen werden kann.