piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
qugeb (2024-06-21 09:26:51+00:00): Siehe Kommentar unter
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152555165
nevw (2024-06-22 00:26:46+00:00): Hi
the wetland has a problem at the Moresby River mouth where it meets Mourilyan Harbour.
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=146.11474&lat=-17.64157&zoom=13
The line across the mouth invalidates the multipolygon as the last water polygon of the Moresby River joins the wetland outer which is disallowed.
The way to fix this is to removed that line from the wetland multipolygon and instead use the bank of the waterways as part of the wetland boundary.
To do this you will need to make each of the waterway polygons into multipolygons and split them so that you have a separate line to use for the wetland following around the boundary of the waterways.
This problem reoccurs at the waterway mouths at the western side of the harbour and at the wooded area in that vicinity.
Let me know if this is too complex for you to correct.
galacticism (2024-06-24 10:24:17+00:00): I've tried to correct this, can you let me know if it looks better now?
nevw (2024-06-24 23:51:08+00:00): This is all fixed now.
I don't see why Lily and Maizie Islands need to be single member multipolygons.
nevw (2024-06-26 07:45:51+00:00): I'm also accepting of the Lily and Maizie Islands one member MPs. Reusing the same way in MPs to have one feature per mp.
Monjur Murshed (2024-06-29 20:16:14+00:00): hzi abdur rohime
Heinz_V (2024-06-30 04:43:54+00:00): ???
sheldonelectric (2025-03-03 18:30:08+00:00): Alice?
woodpeck_repair (2024-06-21 09:55:16+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 152908308.
Friendly_Ghost (2024-06-21 10:33:38+00:00): Thank you very much :)
tomzyl (2024-06-25 17:58:46+00:00): https://a2minsk-siedlce.pl/img/foto/odcinek-3/2024-06/t129/t3-km%20TG%20533+630%20-%20533+830%20profilowanie%20podbudowy%20zasadniczej%20z%20kruszywa%20na%20jezdni%20lewej%20trasy%20g%C5%82%C3%B3wnej.jpg jesli to jest gotowy odcinek to ciekawe mamy standardy.
GanderPL (2024-06-25 19:11:16+00:00): To zdjęcie, z którego miejsca jest? Może to jest dalszy ciąg jeszcze w budowie?
GanderPL (2024-06-25 19:13:49+00:00): Postęp robót
Odcinek od węzła Kałuszyn (bez węzła) do węzła Groszki (z węzłem)
Zaawansowanie rzeczowe projektowania: 99,1%
Zaawansowanie rzeczowe robót:  73,2%
GanderPL (2024-06-25 19:16:13+00:00): https://a2minsk-siedlce.pl/galeria/zdjecia-z-ziemi-o3.html
GanderPL (2024-06-25 19:18:07+00:00): Nie zmieniałbym `construction` z fragmentów, które nie są jeszcze gotowe
tomzyl (2024-06-25 19:21:09+00:00): km TG 533+630 - 533+830 profilowanie podbudowy zasadniczej z kruszywa na jezdni lewej trasy głównej
datowane na 21.06. 
akurat kawałek nieoznaczony jako zbudowany. 
ale są i inne zdjęćia, gdzie widać choćby brak malowania. Jak dla mnie cofka, bo roboty zostało jeszcze od groma.
Dawid2849 (2024-07-13 15:36:32+00:00): Czy przez te 18 dni coś się zmieniło?
tomzyl (2024-07-13 15:41:56+00:00): Dalej nie otwarte i jak otworzą do końca wakacji to będzie ok.
Dawid2849 (2024-07-14 20:56:49+00:00): Czyli do wycofania?
tomzyl (2024-07-15 02:41:38+00:00): Ja bym wycofał. To samo z odcinkiem V, GDDKiA potwierdzała, że wciąż nie ma wniosków o pozwolenie, czyli odbiorów wciąż nie ma, czyli robią.
Bienson (2024-06-21 20:42:24+00:00): Bitte nicht nur den Namen ändern, sondern alle anderen Tags überpüfen und ggf. anpassen. Die Webseite von "Mamo's Taverna" wird sicherlich nicht http://davids-dortmund.de/ sein.

Außerdem wieder erhebliche Versätze bei allen neu eingetragenen Umrissen, da weiterhin veraltete, unscharfe und versetzte Bing Luftbilder verwendet wurde.
Bitte doch einfach NRW Orthophoto benutzen.
Heavyopenmetal (2024-06-21 21:41:17+00:00): Hallo. Vielen lieben Dank für die Tipps. Ja, das mache ich sehr gerne. Ich bin für jeden Tipp/Hilfe sehr dankbar. LG
ma-rt-in (2024-07-07 11:33:42+00:00): Hallo,

leider hast du hier wohl MIssverständnis.
Briefkästen haben keine Adresse, jedoch werden sie mittels ref=* adressiert. Das was der User zuvor unter adress abgelegt hat, muss nur auf ref geändert werden.

Kannst Du das Bitte entsprechend machen.

Viele Grüße
lberges (2024-07-07 11:47:33+00:00): Kann nicht ganz folgen: Unter https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:ref finde ich nichts bzgl. Briefkästen.
ma-rt-in (2024-07-07 11:49:20+00:00): Schau mal hier: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dpost_box
Aleksander Hugo (2024-06-23 19:24:19+00:00): Dlaczego zostały przywrócone nieistniejące już tory dawnej krańcówki? Nie ma po nich najmniejszego śladu — stoi tam nowy budynek lub jest głęboki wykop.
rskedgell (2025-12-05 12:42:40+00:00): There is a small cluster of buildings in this changeset around Ifield Drive with building:levels=w - was this a typo for building:levels=2 ?
Yavotch (2025-12-05 12:59:27+00:00): This is definitely a typo, the finger did not reach 2 and pressed w. I got it fixed, but if you find something like this around Crawley, feel free to fix it
rskedgell (2025-12-05 13:12:48+00:00): Thanks. I thought it was probably something like that.
Venefilyn (2024-06-21 10:40:47+00:00): overpass query used

node[amenity=waste_basket][highway=street_lamp]({{bbox}});
out meta;
rle32795 (2024-06-25 07:52:56+00:00): Hello,
it's great that you are fixing tagging issues.
But there's one thing with the edits. There's some tags added to the edited nodes (which are all the same) which seem to not be verified on the ground.
It would be nice if the changes are reviewed (and reverted when necessary).
rle32795 (2024-06-25 07:57:22+00:00): And there is an power=* tag which seem to be usually used as main tags on nodes. There's no information about using them in combination with tag highway=street_lamp in the wiki.
Venefilyn (2024-06-25 11:12:33+00:00): Hey! Do you have an example of what isn't done correctly?

I checked a few just now and they all look correct. We could revert my whole changeset if need be
rle32795 (2024-06-25 12:51:23+00:00): Probably all tags except highway=street_lamp and bin=yes. They seem to be copy-pasted from a specific node. I'm not sure about all nodes, but I've checked a few nodes and it seems it's like this for all nodes modified.

The added tags include traffic_sign=* tags for a direction sign to Kallahdenniemi and a cycle-footway sign. This was one thing which raised suspicion as there are no signs like these at a park near me where the edits have been made, as the location on the direction sign is in a very different place. I started to wonder, "why there is signs like this?" :D
rle32795 (2024-07-04 07:55:54+00:00): Have you thought about what you're going to do with the changes?

I can also take this upon myself. I'd probably revert all changes other than bin=yes. But I'll probably ask for help with this, at the community forum, for instance.
Venefilyn (2024-07-04 09:26:56+00:00): Reverted it all using https://revert.monicz.dev/
Venefilyn (2024-07-04 09:27:14+00:00): Can you verify?
rle32795 (2024-07-04 10:41:13+00:00): Using Achavi, I saw that the changes seem to be reverted. The revert tools should probably do their thing on all changes on a changeset for sure though.

Thanks for your cooperation!
Hufkratzer (2024-06-21 20:52:13+00:00): Hi,
wieso hast du leisure=horse_riding (Reitanlage) zu https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1273659920 hinzugefügt? Das war und ist noch als Führanlage (animal=horse_walker) gemappt. Eine Führanlage ist keine Reitanlage. Ausserdem ist die Reitanlage, zu der das Ding gehört, bereits als Fläche https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28023031 (Taubermühle) gemappt. Also hast in eine bereits gemappte Reitanlage nochmal eine kleine Reitanlage reingemappt, was mir ziemlich unsinnig erscheint. Wenn das Ding gar keine Führanlage ist, sondern ein Round-Pen oder Longuerzirkel, dann kann man das auch so taggen wie den Reitplatz (leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian), aber nicht als Reitanlage.
Fischkopp0815 (2024-06-21 12:06:37+00:00): Wann wurde der Haltestellenname denn geändert? Ich habe hier ein eigenes Bild (ca. 9 Jahre alt) da steht Gelehrtenschule drauf.

https://up.picr.de/48130586dd.jpg
Murmeltier2 (2024-06-21 13:39:23+00:00): Moin, 

diese Frage kann ich nicht beantworten. Ich wohne erst seit einem Jahr in Meldorf und seitdem ist es auf jeden Fall so, wie ich im Äderungssatz eingetragen habe. Allerdings sind 9 Jahre eine sehr lange Zeit und Änderungen von Haltestellennamen durchaus nicht unüblich. 

Der angegebene Haltestellenname "Meldorf, An den Anlagen" ist sowohl auf den Haltestellenschildern als auch in den Fahrplanunterlagen so angegeben.

Gruss aus Möldorp
Martin
bxl-forever (2024-06-21 12:23:02+00:00): Hello,

Is your source Google Maps, seriously?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#Why_don't_you_just_use_Google_Maps/whoever_for_your_data?

The official data for street names in Digital Vlaanderen GRB, you can even get the background in the online editor (scroll down to the list of backgrounds), which says that the name change from Losseweg to Gemeenveldstraat is on this point: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/250800178
FTstreet (2024-06-24 08:50:54+00:00): Hello,
I saw that the original losseweg was wrong (local knowledge). To make sure whre the road changed name. I went to google streetview and found the place where the goverment placed both signs with arows: https://www.google.be/maps/@50.7393112,4.3285871,3a,31.7y,123.96h,83.31t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sjMMqPhY84Cg7Ue2a2eVUhA!2e0!7i16384!8i8192?hl=nl&coh=205409&entry=ttu
FTstreet (2024-06-24 08:56:42+00:00): Here is an other point of view. You can see that on the crossroad at number 97 there is only a sign for "Gemeenveldstraat". Lower at the crossroad with Het broek, you see signs for both names, with arrows. According to google the pictures are from april 2024.
https://www.google.be/maps/@50.739637,4.3288708,3a,75y,162.07h,69.32t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sT-Y70TC12WjUE8C7-0UiBA!2e0!7i16384!8i8192?hl=nl&coh=205409&entry=ttu
Leo Slager (2024-06-21 23:32:31+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
norgis (2024-07-08 10:46:59+00:00): Blir dette riktig? Det er åpent for buss ut fra Mapillary-bilder (som vel faller inn under motor_vehicles så lenge det ikke eksplisitt gis bus=yes i tillegg?), og det er vel ikke skiltet innkjøring forbudt (no entry), men forbudt for motorvogn, som er to ulike skilt. Dette løser seg vel med riktige access-tagger på Thorvald Meyers gate, og da blir vel denne relasjonen unødvendig?
norgis (2024-07-08 10:50:06+00:00): Nå er jo kanskje motorvogn forbudt i prinsippet det samme som restriction:motor_vehicle=no_entry, men det følger vel uansett fra access-taggene på veiene?
harahu (2024-07-08 22:08:49+00:00): Se diskusjonen på github (https://github.com/organicmaps/organicmaps/issues/8507) ift. hvorfor jeg landet på en restriction i stedet for access-tagging.

Jeg valgte en no_entry-relasjon fordi det er i praksis det som impliseres av skiltet her. Det er ikke noe tilsvarende skilt i andre kjøreretning, så det er ikke noe faktisk forbud mot motorvogn på veien. Man har bare ikke lov å kjøre inn på veien fra dette krysset.

Jeg har ikke lagt til unntak for buss fordi unntaket bare gjelder buss i rute. Buss i rute er bare et lite subsett av alt som kalles buss, og rutebussjåfører er i mindre grad i målgruppen for OSM-basert navigasjon. Om du vet om tags som kan uttrykke "buss i rute", så kan vi heller legge det til.
miluethi (2024-07-20 16:36:26+00:00): Joan,
Your recent building shapes in OSM Nicaragua have several issues:
a) They are far too big and include several single buildings. Please match exactly the building shape on the aerial imagery and  don't combine several free standing building.
b) The shapes are not squared. 99% of the buildings are square. Use the square function ("Q" key") in the iD editor and square all your buildings.

Thank you.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-06-21 11:50:18+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2755176093
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1013289267

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NicaTopo (2024-06-22 15:01:59+00:00): Hi, 
Your building shapes are not squared out and they are far bigger than the aerial imagery. 
Please square out all buildings and narrow down the shapes.
Thank you.
miluethi (2024-07-05 17:40:42+00:00): Annairie,

Your building shapes are far bigger than the imagery. I'm going to delete them.
Frans S (2024-07-02 13:00:30+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Difficult area to map!
A remark. Both path and track are by default unpaved. No need to tag them as such.
Best regards
Claudio Salvatore Fabrizzi (2024-07-02 13:50:17+00:00): Dear Frans,
Thank you very much for your feedback. I changed my JOSM templates for tracks and paths in the meanwhile by deleting the default tags.
Best regards,
Claudio
NicaTopo (2024-06-29 00:09:41+00:00): Hi,
Your shapes don't match the aerial imagery at all. Don't combine separate buildings into one, square out all buildings.

There were some crappy buildings in this area before, don't add more crappy buildings to it.

Thank you.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-06-22 22:06:46+00:00): Please dont remove highway tag
reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153047411
SekeRob (2024-07-20 11:19:28+00:00): Hi,

Your edit covering big part of Central Italy includes putting a barrier=yes on a farm track near Roccamorice at

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3913338020#map=19/42.22699/14.03084

The question QA is asking is what kind of barrier... a gate, a fence, a road block, a tree trunk, heap of rubble to name a few... wondering what your source was since your change set only references the severely outdated ESRI Clarity beta.

At any rate, who/what can pass that barrier=yes point, foot, bike, mtb, agricultural vehicle?

Please let me know.
Thank
Seldor (2024-07-20 21:21:09+00:00): Hi
It's a closed gate with signalled private access.
Source was my own GPS track. I've fixed the barrier point, thanks.
miluethi (2024-07-05 17:34:13+00:00): Joss,

Your buildings shapes are far too big and don't match the imagery. They are not squared out, include several separate buildings and empty space.
I'm going to delete your additions.
AnnaCatarina (2025-09-26 15:32:36+00:00): Hallo Ledman,
was ist eine "Betriebsstufe", nach der eine Stadtbahn, wie Du sie selbst nennst, zur U-Bahn wird?
Gruß.
Anna Catarina
miluethi (2024-07-04 18:13:28+00:00): Jon Karlo,

Please match exactly the aerial imagery with your building shapes and square them out by pressing the "Q" key.
Do not add crappy triangle shapes.
Thank you.
Lisapple (2024-07-15 12:49:16+00:00): Il s'agit d'un doublon de "node/11998852070" (même compte), la commune de Pupillin m'a confirmé qu'il n'y avait qu'un seul défibrillateur dans la mairie.
De plus, le numéro de téléphone n'est pas au bon format.
miluethi (2024-07-04 18:12:09+00:00): Hi Neil,
Please do not combine single buildings into one giant building shape. I'm going to revert this edit.
neil dala (2024-07-04 18:15:15+00:00): Ok, noted. Thank you for letting me know.
miluethi (2024-07-08 19:51:50+00:00): Thanks for understanding. I do not like to destroy somebodys work. I'm sorry.
miluethi (2024-07-05 17:52:27+00:00): Joss,

It's me again. Please make single shapes for each building and square them out. 
I have to delete your shapes. Creating perfect shapes is much faster than correcting odd shapes. Please work more carefully and follow the rules.
Thank you.
miluethi (2024-07-04 18:21:37+00:00): Hi Klirk,

Your additions are not squared out and I'm going to delete them.
Jordi MF (2024-06-21 13:44:18+00:00): Hola Alfonso,

Según las directrices de etiquetado de la wiki española (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Directrices_de_etiquetado_espa%C3%B1olas#Comunitat_Valenciana) las carreteras catalogadas como Red Local (CV-XXX), deben etiqeutarse como highway=secondary o tertiary. En este caso, por su importancia, se ha catalogado como secondary. La carretera catalogada como CV-400, según las indicaciones de kilometraje, empieza a la altura del instituto Joanot Martorell.

Por lo tanto, lo devuelvo a su etiquetado anterior.
miluethi (2024-07-04 18:57:28+00:00): Klirk,
I deleted all you recent OSM building additions for the following reasons:

- the shapes are far bigger the the aerial imagery.
- the shapes are not squared out.

Squaring buildings shapes is easy. Press the "Q" key with a select building shape and done.

Please work more carefully.

Thank you for contributing to OSM Nicaragua.
enristuda007 (2024-06-21 15:59:38+00:00): Hallo JohSin18, bin neu auf OSM, sorry, wenn ich was verbrochen habe. Warum diese rote Linie bei der Ot.-Kirche , weiss ich nicht. Ich habe mein Track der OSM-Map hinzugefügt, damit ich weiss wo ich durchmarschiert bin. Konnte den Track dann nicht löschen. Bin einfach ausgestiegen. Diese 3 Flugzeuglandebahnen zur B317 runter soll ich erzeugt haben ? Habe nun nochmals eine Sitzbank an der Landesgrenze hinzugefügt. 
Bitte um Prüfung.
johsin18 (2024-06-23 13:10:56+00:00): Hallo enristuda007,
freut mich, dass du zu OpenStreetMap beitragen willst.  Du hast versehentlich einen Knoten des Kirchwegs an die B317 verschoben, und weil da eben alles mögliche dranhängt, sieht das dann so seltsam aus.  Ist aber nicht tragisch.  Mit der neuen Sitzbank ist alles bestens.  Trau dich ruhig weitere Verbesserungen zu machen.
Gruß, johsin18
miluethi (2024-07-05 17:36:21+00:00): Joss,

I realized that you created several changesets with building shapes which are far too large.
Please narrow down your building shapes and square the shapes with the "Q" key.

Thank you.
berndw (2024-06-29 17:02:44+00:00): Das bedeutet aber nicht ihn Kommentar zu löschen,  ich werde dieses Changeset revertieren
berndw (2024-06-29 17:06:51+00:00): Der Weg verläuft _unter_, also nicht doppelt
Leo Slager (2024-06-21 23:43:55+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Kovoschiz (2024-06-21 13:17:41+00:00): 1. You should change it to `sidewalk:both=separate` , not remove the `sidewalk=` only. Furthermore, the network of `=footway` should be ensured to be correctly drawn and fully connected. 
2. We discussed this recently.  `=use_sidepath` is technically not  accurate. It isn't illegal to walk on the carriageway.
Leo Slager (2024-06-21 23:48:40+00:00): Dag Neal,
Het is goed om te weten dat gebouwen en adressen in NL rechtstreeks worden geïmporteerd van uit de BAG van het Kadaster.
Beter om daar niets aan te veranderen. Fouten in de omtrek van een gebouw kun je melden bij het Kadaster.
Een (her) import van het genouw kun je aanvragen in ons forum.

Veel plezier met verder mappen,
Leo
NorthCrab_upload (2024-06-21 12:40:16+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11998894113

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
akimapbuilder (2024-06-21 13:50:13+00:00): Hi! I had to revert your changeset since there is no building in sight.
Leo Slager (2024-06-21 23:50:11+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
mboeringa (2024-07-02 21:32:59+00:00): Hi,

I noticed you added back in the Seoul node e.g. the Seoul boundary relation. That by itself is fine, however, I would recommend to set the *node* to admin_level=2 instead of 4, the highest level it represents. 

It is a frequent misconception that people think the *node* needs to have the same admin_level of a boundary *relation* it is part of.

This is not true. 

The simple proof of that is already in the fact that this node is part of both a boundary *relation* with admin_level 2 representing the entire country of South Korea:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/307756

And a local admin_level=4 relation representing the Seoul administrative or metropolitan area:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2297418

In this case, almost all other countries in the world have the *node* of the country capital set to admin_level=2, not 4 or whatever lower admin_level is appropriate for a corresponding boundary *relation*.

This allows renderers to properly display the node as country capital, without having to parse all possible relations the node is part of in search of the one with the highest (country) level admin_level tag, which is cumbersome.
VLD316 (2024-07-03 15:35:34+00:00): Hi mboeringa,
I appreciate you bringing this to my attention. I didn’t notice that this node was part of a larger boundary relation. I noticed that the tag was removed in changeset 143605371 back in November-  https://osmcha.org/changesets/143605371. That is what prompted me to look into it, and I found that source I linked my changeset comment. I’ll add back the level 2 admin.
Thank you again, please feel free to reach out if you have any further questions, comments, or concerns. Have a good day!
-Nick
jleedev (2024-06-24 19:07:17+00:00): Just to clarify, do you ride your bike on the train tracks over the parkway or do you fall through the open bridge deck and cross the stream below?

More to the point, is this path based on reality in any way?
akimapbuilder (2024-06-21 13:52:26+00:00): Hi! I had to revert your changeset since there is no waterbody in sight.
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-21 13:15:58+00:00): #vandalism
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-21 13:16:52+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/152993024
d_berger (2024-06-21 14:47:58+00:00): Hallo, nochmals. Lösche keine tags, die du nicht kennst. Dazu gehören auch korrekt gemappte Gebäudeteile, wo sich jemand die Mühe gemacht hat die einzelnen Dachformen und -farben zu erfassen. Danke.
terster (2024-06-21 15:00:41+00:00): Ich arbeite da.
d_berger (2024-06-21 15:08:50+00:00): Was bitte spielt das für eine Rolle? Die physischen Gebäudeeigenschaften ändern sich dadurch schon mal sicher nicht.
d_berger (2024-06-21 14:38:53+00:00): Bitte lies die tags richtig, das ist mit 'building=construction' eingetragen und bereits der neue Gebäudegrundriss.
Syl (2024-06-21 13:29:54+00:00): Erreur dans la source, note utilisée : https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4169681
user_3022894 (2025-01-13 13:03:41+00:00): Hallo Glubb,

Ich wollte dir nur Bescheid geben, dass die von dir hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11998960243/history eingefügten Fahrkartenautomaten an dieser Stelle nicht vorhanden sind. Es stehen allerdings auf der gegenüberliegenden Seite am Treppenaufgang welche (die auch bereits kartiert sind).
Möglicherweise hattest du die Seiten verwechselt.
LG Lukas
SeviyMan (2024-06-21 20:00:02+00:00): дубликат адреса натворили..... пацаева 17 - жилой дом в этом же месте, у него адрес уже был
Dimitar155 (2024-08-12 20:52:14+00:00): Hey Max,

Please use Esri World Imagery in the future. Esri Clarity is quite old and outdated around this area.

Happy mapping,
Dimitar
DeFra85 (2024-09-02 18:21:58+00:00): Hej hej, von Hesseln bis zum Riesberg stehen die meisten neuen Masten mittlerweile. Ab dann folgt die Erdverkabelung
Rémi_ (2024-06-21 14:05:54+00:00): J'ai oublié d'indiquer les sources :
BDortho IGN et SNgo!
DeFra85 (2024-06-29 11:12:29+00:00): Infos:
https://www.borgholzhausen.de/sv_borgholzhausen/Aktuelles/Pressemitteilungen/Vollsperrung%20des%20Barenbergwegs%20aufgrund%20von%20Erschlie%C3%9Fungsarbeiten%20im%20Gewerbegebiet%20%E2%80%9EAm%20Stadtgraben%E2%80%9C/

https://www.borgholzhausen.de/sv_borgholzhausen/Leben/Bauen%20u.%20Wohnen/Baugebiete/Bebauungsplan%20Nr.%20%2012.2%20Gewerbegebiet%20Am%20Stadtgraben.pdf
somix (2024-06-23 09:01:30+00:00): дублируете адрес