piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
MxxCon (2024-03-20 17:37:54+00:00): Hello.
The way you added phone numbers is not outright wrong, but it's more correct when they are separated either by space or -. This format is documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone#Usage 👍
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148878648
eggie (2024-03-19 20:10:37+00:00): Thx   Ik heb het uitgelijnd mbv de BGT
Groet
eggie
m2fc (2024-04-08 23:18:09+00:00): Oi,
no nó 10742031405 colocaste MNC 02 numa Vantage e depois MEO no operator. confirma e corrige quando puderes
Alexmol (2024-04-09 06:54:21+00:00): Olá
Corrigido, foi MEO que se juntou, até tenho foto e tudo, enganei-me no MNC.
Obrigado
micheleOSM3 (2025-08-03 06:16:42+00:00): il sentiero 802 non fa parte dei sentieri CAI, vedi https://www.cai-fvg.it/sentieri-cai-fvg/settore-8-prealpi-carniche/
Forse è stato dismesso dal CAI e sono rimasti i segnavia, in tal caso sarebbe da rimuovere operator=Club Alpino Italiano
CurlingMan13 (2024-03-19 20:16:31+00:00): Do not "lollipop" areas to create simulated holes in an area. You should use multipolygon relations instead.

This changeset has been reverted in part or full to remove "fake holes" in the area.

I highly suggest you review the "Common Mapping Pitfalls" section of the wiki prior to making further edits:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148879750
CurlingMan13 (2024-03-19 20:18:43+00:00): Why are you continuing to change service roads incorrectly to cartpaths?  Do not change things to what they are not just for your silly golf game.  Do not map for the renderer...
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148879092
CurlingMan13 (2024-03-19 20:19:21+00:00): Do not "lollipop" areas to create simulated holes in an area. You should use multipolygon relations instead.

This changeset has been reverted in part or full to remove "fake holes" in the area.

I highly suggest you review the "Common Mapping Pitfalls" section of the wiki prior to making further edits:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148879843
eggie (2024-03-19 20:27:50+00:00): Bij dDe afslag naar de Laan staat de oneway=yes verkeerd om.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-03-19 20:49:14+00:00): De richting heb ik omgedraaid. het zou anders niet routeren voor fietsers.
Tip Probeer steeds te controleren wat je hebt gedaan en ga dan pas door naar je volgende project. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-03-19 20:32:59+00:00): Tip Wanneer je building=yes verwijderd zal een gebouw niet meer renderen op de kaart zoals de fietsenstalling.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=148879907
MVG
eggie
Frans S (2024-03-21 12:25:52+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
A remark about mapping highways
How to decide when a trace is a path or an unclassified highway
First, look what they connect.  Houses, settlements, villages. Then measure the width of that trace.
In iDeditor 

Shortcut : Ctrl+⇧ Shift+M – toggle  opens measurement panel
Draw a line between the shoulders of a trace (zoom in very far) and read the distance.
If a trace is max 2 meters wide, tag it as a path.
Wider and connect hamlets, houses and villages should be tagged as unclassified.
Tag residential in urban areas (villages, towns)
In JOSM, use the measure tab, or draw a circle (round building, shortcut Alt-Z when the building plugin is installed)) between the shoulders of a trace and read the distance on the lower toolbar. (remove the circle after that)

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/East_Africa_Tagging_Guidelines
This is mentioned about tracks on the
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Routing#Routing_considerations

Quote: Tracks are roads of agricultural purpose. They usually connect fields to farms. The surface sometimes makes them inaccessible for regular cars, or at least limits the speeds to a very slow pace. Tracks should always be avoided for through-going traffic or within urban areas.

Please solve the issues shown by the Issue triangle before uploading your work.

btw.  These traces should be tagged as path.

Best regards
PcMouse1 (2024-03-24 00:44:16+00:00): Welcome back Geography Canada!
martinst (2024-03-19 20:40:12+00:00): Hallo WayMarker89,
name=* ist nur für Eigennamen vorgesehen. man_made=maypole beschreibt bereits ausreichend. 
Bitte das Tagging name=Maibaum wieder entfernen.
rik_ (2024-03-20 11:30:56+00:00): Hallo :-)

du hast hier den Way für das abgerissene Gebäude[1] gelöscht, obwohl es bereits als `razed:building` korrekt getaggt war.

Es kann durchaus hilfreich sein, solche historischen Informationen in der Datenbank zu haben (zumal das Gebäude ein gewisses Stück Bestenseer Geschichte in sich trägt, Stichwort ehemalige "Netzbau Bestensee").

Ich werde diesen Weg daher wiederherstellen, bitte nicht wundern.

Viele Grüße

rik

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/690644973
SDW310 (2024-03-20 11:43:14+00:00): Alles ist klar, ich stimme Ihrem Kommentar zu.
eggie (2024-03-19 20:55:30+00:00): Beste Arie 
Je vraagt om feedback.
Hoe kan nu een instelling van adres veranderen. De Kettingstraat 30 is toch niet hier?
Haal de info hier vanaf zonder het adres te veranderen en tag op de kettingstraat de info op het nieuwe adres.

Ik zet deze wijziging terug. Bovendien is het geen alpine_hut.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-03-19 20:56:24+00:00): reverted by changeset Wijzigingenset #148881200
eggie (2024-03-19 20:58:22+00:00): De club heb ik verwijderd en het adres hersteld.
Voeg op het nieuwe adres de club toe als club en niet als Alpinehut. Dat kan in de description. Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=148880763
tordans (2024-04-04 14:38:19+00:00): Hallo hejco, du hattest eine Review requested. Ich habe in https://osmcha.org/changesets/149573756 Details ergänzt und korrigiert. Sind sehr unterschiedliche Sachen, die können wir gern im nächsten Meetup mal anschauen. — Frohes Mappen!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148881217
NorthCrab_upload (2024-03-19 21:10:25+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3140463012
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1211969023

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2024-03-19 21:20:23+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4365396745
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/367630913

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Frans S (2024-03-21 12:17:25+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. However, A number of buildings are not squared.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148882005
voltairovicz (2024-03-24 14:32:37+00:00): Wydaje się, że droga prowadząca przez miasto równolegle do eski nie powinna być tak wysokiej kategorii, aby nie prowadziła auta przez centrum miasta, tylko na drogę szybkiego ruchu
alexey_zakharenkov (2024-03-21 07:29:41+00:00): Здравствуйте!

Правильно писать не "улица Железнодорожная", а "Железнодорожная улица" - как на дороге, так и в адресах. Исправьте, пожалуйста.
То же с Муромской улицей.
mavl (2024-03-26 15:06:33+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок отменён.
mavl (2024-03-26 15:37:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149183745 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15868].
eggie (2024-03-20 10:25:14+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback  Je kun de bedrijfsinformatie gewoon verwijderen van de adresnode. Laat dan wel de adresgegevens intact.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=148883152
MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Allison P (2024-06-10 22:53:39+00:00): Someone has reverted your change https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152500638
Joseph R P (2024-06-11 00:44:28+00:00): Thank you for informing me. Looks like there may be a greater problem here with all the rapid city reclassification edits they're making.
ivanbranco (2025-05-07 19:00:38+00:00): Che nomi particolari, qual é la fonte di questi nomi?
silversurfer83 (2024-03-20 08:09:20+00:00): Gude :)

Frage: Wie ist der Weg denn beschildert? Also welche Verkehrszeichen regeln die Durchfahrt?
Weil so, wie du ihn aktuell getaggt hast dürfen NUR landwirtschaftliche Fz und Busse da durch.

Details zu Zugangsbeschränkungen hat einmal folgende Wikiseite
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access

und diese Seite hilft ganz gut beim erstellen der passenden tags:
https://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/

cheers
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148884655
edbedbe (2024-03-23 21:58:22+00:00): Hallo, danke für die Ressourcen. Ich weiß zu der genauen Beschilderung nichts, da ich die Information selbst nur aus einem Hinweis habe (Nr. 4148939).
Da wurde angegeben: 
"Durchfahrt für Kfz verboten, nur für Landwirtschaftliche Fahrzeuge und Busse frei."
Ich habe die Tags vergeben wie JOSM-Preset sie mir vorgeschlagen hat. Allerdings ist access=agricultural tatsächlich problematisch da Rad- und Fußverkehr ausgeschlossen wird. Das sollte also in vehicle=agricultural geändert werden.
silversurfer83 (2024-03-23 22:09:00+00:00): Ok.
Macht halt leider einen Unterschied ob da ein VZ250 oder ein VZ260 jeweils mit Zusatzzeichen steht.

Habe den Hinweis nochmal eröffnet. Vielleicht findet sich jemand vor Ort, der das recherchieren kann.

Schönes Wochenende erstmal :)

Silversurfer83
edbedbe (2024-03-23 22:21:34+00:00): Ja, das lässt sich aus der Ferne nicht sagen. Gute Idee den Hinweis zu reaktivieren. Danke und ebenfalls schönes Wochenende
DENelson83 (2024-03-20 05:23:40+00:00): If you removed the "ele" tag from some of these nodes because they are not actually peaks, those nodes should be tagged as "natural"="ridge" or "natural"="mountain_range" instead of "natural"="peak".
Xvtn (2024-03-22 14:34:34+00:00): Hi! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes here. I'm no piste expert, but from what I can tell everything looks great! Thanks for your contributions.
eginhard (2024-03-20 16:22:28+00:00): Bienvenue chez OSM ! Ici t'as supprimé le préfixe "fr:" du tag "wikipedia". Par contre, il est nécessaire pour indiquer la langue de l'article (voir: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:wikipedia). Le nom (dans "name=Plateforme 10") était déjà correct. N'hésite pas à me contacter si t'as des questions. -eginhard
FasterTracker (2026-01-12 05:21:38+00:00): Hello!
I have some questions regarding two highways in Chamboeira: "Rua da Brasieira" and "Rua do Forno".

In the first one there's a no exit sign coming from the EN 116 and aerial images seem to corroborate such. Therefore, are the two highways really connected as you mapped?

Concerning the latter, you changed the northern part of the highway from "path" to "residential" despite of the fact that it does not have enough width nor a proper layout so that motor vehicles could drive. Thus, was there a particular reason for this change?

With the best regards,
FT
kcpels (2026-01-12 10:35:55+00:00): I apologize for any inaccuracies. These updates (adding road names and drawing roads that did not yet exist in OSM) were from a trail run I did nearby almost 2 years ago, and I cross referenced the ground truth I observed with public SIG resources from Camara Municipal Loures (https://geoweb1.cm-loures.pt/MuniSIG/Html5Viewer/index.html?viewer=MapaGeral.MapaGeral) which showed/shows Rua da Brasieira as connected. But I agree it appears disconnected from recent satellite imagery. I doubt I will be able to run there anytime soon to confirm. For Rua do Forno, I disagree that it should be reverted to a path because from satellite imagery appears to be a single track dirt road and there is at least one house with a garage along the way. If you wanted to change it from residential road to minor/unclassified, I wouldn't squabble. Just my opinion.
FasterTracker (2026-01-13 18:45:18+00:00): Hello again. Thanks for replying.

Regarding "Rua da Brasieira" the SIG resource in question shows the PDM of the Municipality and thus it shows planned features that haven't been yet executed. 

Regarding "Rua do Forno" I'm referring to the part that is north of said house being a path since that was why the way was split in the first place. Up to the house is a residencial road and north from that is definitely a path due to the reasons listed in my previous comment.

Since I'm editing the area I'll fix these two things. Thanks so much for your feedback.
With the best regards
FT
yopaseopor (2024-03-20 14:28:05+00:00): As you know this place is in a special language protected zone (https://www.boe.es/buscar/doc.php?id=BOE-A-2013-6103) So please don't delete this in a modality typical of this zone.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-03-20 00:00:26+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11746881247

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2024-03-20 00:00:26+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11746937589

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
CurlingMan13 (2024-03-20 05:03:29+00:00): Access=private was already tagged to the ways.  This is in accordance with OSM guidelines.  Do not delete ways/features just because they are private.  This is not the solution.  You can read why here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148892143
tekim (2024-03-24 00:35:48+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap (OSM).  Thanks for editing the map.  Unfortunately, we are not allowed to use Google Maps when editing OSM due to Google's terms of use.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-03-20 00:20:15+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8691581387
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/109450362

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
gscholz (2024-04-20 10:17:31+00:00): Hi csimeona22,
regarding this changeset I am curious about where to get this "Maxar SecureWatch" background map? An other question is, how does this imagery connect the hamlet "Pueblo Nuevo", as this seems to be pretty isolated after your changes.
Guido
csimeona22 (2024-04-22 23:12:27+00:00): Greetings gscholz,

Thanks for the questions. Concerning your first question, Apple has an agreement with Maxar to use their more recent imagery to edit OpenStreetMap, which is not publicly available for editing OpenStreetMap. We generally use the imagery that is already available in JOSM but where we do use that more recent imagery, we always cite it and the date the imagery is from in the changeset source.

As for your second question, the hamlet’s roads and buildings were completely devastated by this year's flooding in the above imagery. I was unsure if this town may be rebuilt, so I left the place node features unchanged. The trunk reroute that I modeled can be confirmed by the OSM community with Strava GPS traces which I cited in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148888971. 

I added the removed roads back that used to reach Pueblo Neuvo with destroyed:highway tagging (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix), and track tagging for the sections of road that can still be seen. I will leave the POIs tagging as it is now for the local community to update since I do not know if there are plans to rebuild or not.

Regards,
Csimeona22
gscholz (2024-04-23 13:49:09+00:00): Thanks for the clarification and adjustments.
Guido
CurlingMan13 (2024-03-20 05:48:15+00:00): Do not partially overlap landcovers (fairways and greens).  This has been mentioned multiple times.  Please acknowledge receipt and understanding of this comment.

You have not acknowledged previous comments or responded, yet are continuing to map with the same mistakes.  I have not received a DM or other form of communication explaining why you are continuing to map in this manner.  Doing so may result in referral to DWG for further action.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148888757
emersonveenstra (2024-03-20 10:53:50+00:00): Hi there,

Did you mean to connect the sidewalk to the railway here? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4707597177#map=19/42.48397/-83.14323
Dave-o-rama (2024-03-20 20:30:16+00:00): No sorry. First and last time I try to edit on an iPad.
woodpeck (2024-03-20 08:37:32+00:00): Hello dsmith2, in this changeset you deleted two dozen buildings which are still visible on our current aerial imagery. Have these houses been destroyed, or was this a mistake on your part?
dsmith10 (2024-03-20 12:43:27+00:00): I was working to update the island after post-hurricane efforts, but I got logged out and could not finish
gemsquash (2024-03-22 09:01:43+00:00): i think the name is Badulla General Hospital and it's here:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/6.99084/81.051
Warin61 (2025-11-15 04:51:17+00:00): Hi
The relation type=building does not render??? 
I'm trying this: the outer way as a multipolygon relation - there are at lest 2 holes in it according to Esri so this is 'legal'? That should get the outer to render.. I have left the building relation alone other than setting the outline to the multipolygon relation... see how that goes?
Warin61 (2025-11-17 01:21:35+00:00): There, rendered on default map. Some of the enclosed features may not be there any more ... sculptures relocated?
CurlingMan13 (2024-03-20 03:12:07+00:00): Do not partially overlap areas.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148890250
theDM (2025-09-02 20:57:23+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1263696372
Ten odcinek nie jest przebudowywany w ramach tego samego zadania, co construction?
Shamazu (2025-09-03 01:54:27+00:00): Wszystkie odcinki proposed / construction z https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1264386896 są w budowie. Podzielone na turn:lanes i z nową geometrią. Trzeba będzie zamienić z construction na istniejącą trasę. Dawno nie byłem przejazdem i nie miałem czasu na aktualizacje, ale budowa zbliża się ku końcowi :)
theDM (2025-09-03 07:58:28+00:00): Patrzyłem na tagi w tych proposed, toi tam są tagowanie detale takie jak turn:lanes.
fortera_au (2025-04-11 02:25:15+00:00): Hi LokNeko,

Andrew from the Data Working Group here,

Could you please explain why you removed details from a substation (that shows on the imagery listed as being used) and set it to be landuse=grass instead?

Kind regards,
Andrew Welch, OSMF Data Working Group
fortera_au (2025-04-11 02:25:38+00:00): Translated via libretranslate.com

嗨,乐尼可

数据工作组的安德鲁

请解释你为什么从一个分站删除细节(显示在列出的图像上被使用)并将其设定为土地利用=草?

敬请
安德鲁·韦尔奇,OSMF 数据工作组
LokNeko (2025-04-11 12:45:20+00:00): I need to do a detailed edit of the internal facilities of the water plant, and I deleted the names to avoid legal risks in China.

After the detailed edit, I can add the names back.
fortera_au (2025-04-11 12:50:16+00:00): Hi,

Please don't delete data that is still valid, this changeset was completely incorrect if that area is not just grass. If you're going to make changes, make them straight away, there was a significant delay before this "grass" area was changed, and it still lacks significant detail compared to its previous state. 

Please also don't remove valid names from OpenStreetMap.
LokNeko (2025-04-11 12:52:14+00:00): A year ago I received news that the power station was closed and demolished, but after an on-site inspection I found that it was not closed, so it was converted back into an industrial area.
LokNeko (2025-04-11 12:54:14+00:00): I'm sorry, I just registered a year ago so I may have made a mistake
LokNeko (2025-04-11 12:57:14+00:00): Can you help me roll back to the version from a year ago? Naming power stations is illegal in China
LokNeko (2025-04-11 13:03:21+00:00): Revert back to Version 7
fortera_au (2025-04-11 23:52:44+00:00): I've reverted it back to version 7, however I'd recommend restoring any tags you've removed that are still valid, and double checking that your sources are correct before making changes.

You also should have reverted it back to the state it was previously in when you found out your edit was incorrect.
LokNeko (2025-04-12 08:21:01+00:00): Thanks!
I will check my changes carefully,
Supaplex (2024-03-21 02:07:42+00:00): Chào Quản Quốc Tân

Bạn có thể giải thích việc bạn loại bỏ đồ đạc trên Đảo Tiền không? Có vẻ như những đặc điểm bản đồ này vẫn tồn tại.

Dennis Raylin Chen
Data Working Group
data@osmfoundation.org

Hi Quản Quốc Tân

Can you explain your removal of stuff on Money Island? It seems these map features still exist.

Dennis Raylin Chen
Data Working Group
data@osmfoundation.org
Jon Snow 47 (2024-03-22 09:59:38+00:00): Vandalism OPM Data team please block and delete users edit. User has caused vandalism to the map with an imaginary city that doesn’t exist. Not approved by state or federal government.