piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
BCNorwich (2024-11-22 07:39:16+00:00): Hi, The cantonment blocks would not all be named "Cantonment". The overall cantonment area is named/tagged as "Nashik Cantonment" so your building names are not needed. The buildings could be described as individual cantonments but not named cantonments.

Regards Bernard.
JJIglesias (2024-11-21 17:19:52+00:00): Por Favor, cuando dibujes edificios no te olvides que deben ortogonalizarse o escuadrarse en su gran mayoría, para ello solo tienes que marcar la edificación y presionar la letra Q y automáticamente se ejecutara para ese edificio y asi sucesivamente debes hacer.

Gracias
dpolovinkin (2025-05-19 09:00:51+00:00): hi, just to mention - this road is hardly residential, don't you think? :)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1336492283
Thierry1030 (2024-11-23 12:51:57+00:00): Hello cimm,
you confirm that cycle highway F29 is "signposted with F29-signs"?
There's a convention how existing and future/proposed cycle highways should be mapped > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cycle_network%3DBE-VLG:cycle_highway
Thanks for your reply
cimm (2024-11-23 13:31:07+00:00): Hi Thierry,

I did not realize the cycle highway needed to be signposted to be complete, my mistake.

I added the state=proposed tag again.

Thanks for your comment!
Una tantum (2026-06-20 12:05:27+00:00): Ciao @Dom61, non è più una farmacia, forse potresti togliere anche dispensing=yes che ne pensi?
Taksine (2024-11-22 05:05:06+00:00): 你不能这么加，因为谷歌是傻逼，所以我不知道你看得到吗
BCNorwich (2024-11-21 15:52:22+00:00): Hi, The business doesn't occupy the whole building so the tags shouldn't go on the building outline. I've made it a POI node within the building outline.

Regards Bernard.
maro21 (2024-11-26 00:57:42+00:00): Dlaczego unclassified, a nie tertiary?
pavvv (2024-11-27 06:33:57+00:00): Cały tranzyt z mostu Grunwaldzkiego na Zwierzyniecki jedzie przez Rondo Reagana, bo tamtędy jest szybciej. Wybrzeże Wyspiańskiego służy do dojazdu do Politechniki, itp.
Dałem tu unclassified zamiast tertiary, bo porównuję drogę do innych dróg w okolicy, ale nie tylko do tych, do których droga przylega. Uważam, że droga jest o wiele mniej ważna od ul. Grunwaldzkiej, Na Grobli, itp
bradrh (2024-11-21 16:41:32+00:00): Plz keep your changesets confined to a smaller geographic area.   LA to Cheyenne is a big area, so I can't tell what was changed in Cent CO.  thx.
Aleksei Gurianov (2024-11-21 16:10:14+00:00): Thanks for your contribution.
Please consider using Esri Aerial images as they tend to be newer and better aligned.
dieterdreist (2024-12-02 20:42:54+00:00): Ciao, benvenuto in OpenStreetMap. Ho notato che hai aggiunto il tag railway=subway al tratto della Metro C in progetto, ma così lo segni come Metro attiva. L'ho ripristinato, ma ti volevo farlo sapere.

Saluti,
Martin
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-11-23 04:23:38+00:00): Fake motorway
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159415002
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-11-23 04:28:45+00:00): reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159482409
une abeille (2024-11-22 12:13:52+00:00): I'll be surveying this lane on the weekend and adding the separation details. Thanks for putting the lane in. :)
tahini (2024-11-22 12:39:31+00:00): Nice, thanks! I was also planning to do that and get all the new turn/bus lanes details. I'll wait for your update then!
une abeille (2024-11-22 12:52:47+00:00): Expect 360° images on Mapillary by Sunday!
tahini (2024-11-22 13:04:43+00:00): Great! I was going to take a walk with pencil and paper... :p
LKAsahi (2024-11-21 15:44:54+00:00): 最近在編輯市府周邊區域，發現基隆路地下道這段繪製後因道路過寬而重疊，難以直接閱讀，所以試著在遵守標籤規則及導航規則的情況下編輯這段的線型，希望能更容易閱讀～
yasslay (2024-12-03 09:55:37+00:00): Hi mapeing/demise,

I've reverted this changeset as the roadworks at Key Street have not yet been completed. In fact, I think preparatory works just started. Please do not make fantasy edits like these to OSM again - they're very disruptive and can be hard to clean up properly.

Happy mapping,
Yasslay

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159873632
Kovoschiz (2024-11-22 16:05:08+00:00): 1. As mentioned before, please keep `office=` for actual offices. Not a site, or building. 
2. `=townhall` has special meaning that may be useful for expressing a government center
Kovoschiz (2024-11-22 16:06:07+00:00): 3. Adding `building=` to the entire site is wrong
Woazboat (2024-11-28 10:43:30+00:00): Hallo, was ist denn hier mit den ganzen (leeren/hin-und-her) Änderungen an dieser Node los? Verwendet ihr die irgendwie um etwas zu testen?

lg, Woazboat
Kovoschiz (2024-11-22 16:12:50+00:00): An offices building should simply be `=office`
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-11-27 02:03:54+00:00): not a building
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159416194
AdrianLangtry (2024-11-22 16:17:39+00:00): There's loads of these mapped 8 years ago at random all along the N3 in County Cavan, next ones are Whitegate Cross Roads and Killyduff townland, not sure what the consensus is for these.
AdrianLangtry (2024-11-22 16:19:17+00:00): Lisgrea Cross Roads, Billis Cross, New Inn too, then not at Maggie Lee's Cross
LateNightTone (2024-11-22 17:05:54+00:00): Thanks for those, I may get to them at some point 😊

Even a short distance NW of this edit there's a long section of the Cavan Road which should just be a single carriageway, with traffic islands mapped as nodes. The approach I take is as documented on the OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Dual_carriageway) - if there is no physical barrier separating the carriageways, it's not a dual carriageway and should be mapped as a single way. As a result the Cavan Road has driveways linked to only one side of the road, but you can guarantee the road design is not meant to be left-in left-out only for those access ways. There are occasional exceptions to what's in the wiki, but roads like these are pretty clear cut (see also examples on the wiki page).

It does take some unpicking of relations though (bus routes and the like), so needs some care. I also check which way is the oldest of the two, to retain as much edit history as possible. Give it a try some time – or otherwise I may get round to it.
AdrianLangtry (2024-11-22 17:25:37+00:00): Sounds good, I know for a fact it's wrong from people 'going round the block' we would call it to get to my parents house in the area using Sat Nav, it was always a nightmare, I usually leave this routing alone in case I break something. 

All I did was join the driveways across this imaginary dual carriageway to get to the other side. I might give it a go if I'm feeling up for a challenge at some point.
jtn20 (2024-11-30 18:27:15+00:00): These roads still aren't open. Did you mean to change this in the globally visible map? I'm assuming not, so I've reinstated the construction tags (in changeset 159783702).
Langlaeufer (2024-11-22 13:47:11+00:00): Hallo Jonas, willkommen bei OSM. Schön, dass du uns hilfst die Karte zu verbessern. Bitte schau dir mal die Doku zu surface an und prüfe ob das wirklich so passt: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:surface pebble_stone meint eher losen Kies (runde Steine). solche Wege fallen jedoch meist in die Kategorie "verdichtet" (compacted) - ein Gemisch aus groben und feinen Material).
Grüße und weiterhin frohes Mappen.
Langläufer
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159417114
TornadoFang (2024-11-22 14:04:42+00:00): Wie der Artikel bestätigt, ist es dann Loser Kies.
Langlaeufer (2024-11-22 16:43:53+00:00): O.k. alles klar
Glassman (2024-11-22 18:40:38+00:00): To make a circle object, just draw a rough circle, then type an "o" and you'll have a perfect circle. Also, water towers are tagged as man_made=water_tower. tagging helps to easily identify objects. Can you update this?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159417287
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-11-23 04:25:06+00:00): Please don't name random buildings.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159417307
VLD062 (2024-12-30 19:20:13+00:00): Hi TheBestIdea!

 I'm thinking of adding foot accessibility to this greenway (for example way: 1189989588), and I wanted to check in with you first. According to this map, it looks like walking might be okay here (https://www.traillink.com/trail/hudson-river-greenway/). But I'd love to get your thoughts on it if adding foot access would be a good idea? Any insights or concerns you have would be really helpful!

Thanks,
Jesspher
user_3022894 (2024-12-13 06:53:31+00:00): Hallo LeoW,

Der schrottige, nicht mehr genutzte Lastenaufzug in Dinslaken existiert als größeres Gebäude nach wie vor. Es gibt also keinen Grund, dieses zu löschen.
Viele Grüße
Lukas
woodpeck_repair (2024-11-21 16:18:36+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 159407400, 159408634, 159409749.
Edelsalami (2025-04-28 07:06:35+00:00): Hi FKaindl, du hast Namen für die Ackerflächen hinzugefügt - darf ich fragen woher diese stammen? Laut ATKIS haben die Liegenschaften andere Bezeichnungen, nämlich "An der Grindkuhle" und "Im Eichengrund". Gruß
fb552 (2024-11-28 10:24:44+00:00): Perhaps a mistake but I doubt there is a level crossing on the side of Saint Peter's
GBAB (2024-11-28 20:31:36+00:00): You're right, sorry. I don't know how I did it but now it is removed.
PierZen (2025-08-01 23:02:53+00:00): Sur quelle base vous vous appuyez pour reclassifier de primaire à trunk ?  Il n'y a pas de grandes villes sur ce parcours. Avez-vous des statistiques de traffic ou qualité de la route pour le justifier ?
Himké (2025-08-02 19:37:44+00:00): La Route Trans-Québec-Labrador et Trans-Labrador Highway sont classées comme "Trunk" car elles forment une route interprovinciale et font partie du réseau routier national (NHS)
Himké (2025-08-02 19:38:23+00:00): As in many regions of Canada (far north in the Yukon / Northwest Territories, there is no need for it to be paved, as there is not a high volume of traffic. But it still has that national level of importance. This is the core cross-Canada road network, and it should be viewable at low zoom levels. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Canada/Tagging_guidelines#Trunk
PierZen (2025-08-03 23:27:33+00:00): Avant de reclassifier une telle route, avez-vous regardé l'impact sur les itinéraires routiers proposé ?  Le wiki n'est pas la bible et il faut bien documenter ces choix surtout en territoire nordique et très isolé. On dit que c'est la route la plus isolée en Amérique du nord, sauvage et infestée de moustiques, que le cellulaire n'est pas disponible partout et que les postes d'essences et  ateliers de réparation sont limités. Sans doute pas de problème pour les camions de transport pour lesquels les infrastructures son en place.  Mais pouvez-vous affirmer documentation à l'appui que la route Trans-Québec-Labrador convient aux automobilistes avec simple voiture, que la chaussée est en suffisamment bon état, que l'hébergement,  et la sécurité sont suffisamment bien assurés pour les automobilistes? 

Le basculement entre les itinéraires nord et sud proposés entre Edmunston et Grand-Sault semble montrer que la reclassification highway=trunk  n'est pas neutre et qu'il faut bien documenter de telles décisions de reclassification. Faudrait-il également ajouter des attributs à ces chemins dans OSM  pour décrire les difficultés possiblement rencontrées ?
 
OSRM ne réussit pas à proposer  d'itinéraire via via Terre-Neuve, cela même de même North-Sydney.
L'analyse d'itinéraires via GraphHopper et Valhalla  montre les deux itinéraires route+traversier  possibles pour se rendre à Blanc-Sablon 
1.  route Trans-Québec-Labrador pour Edmunston et villes plus au nord
Edmunston - Blanc Sablon - Distance: 2091 km. Temps: 24:18. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_valhalla_car&route=47.3764611%2C-68.3103231%3B51.4121624%2C-57.2018488#map=5/50.64/-62.84

2. route Transcanadienne pour Grand-Sault et villes plus au sud
Grand-Sault - Blanc Sablon via route transcanadienne  - Distance: 1635 km. Temps: 23:43. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_valhalla_car&route=47.047563%2C-67.7407527%3B51.4121624%2C-57.2018488#map=6/48.51/-62.27
Himké (2025-08-05 21:20:07+00:00): Les travaux d'amélioration de la route 389 justifient cette reclassification. L'impact sur les itinéraires routiers ne devrait pas être la principale préoccupation. D'autres sites Web de cartes donnent-ils également les mêmes itinéraires, n'est-ce pas ?
PierZen (2025-08-05 22:26:38+00:00): Avec ce parcours, un automobiliste a beaucoup de défis avec camions lourds, pas de cellulaire, peu de services routiers et hébergement, et conditions hivernales très dangereuses de septembre a mai. Si vous croyez que les améliorations à la route sont suffisantes, il vous reste à en discuter d'abord avec la communauté locale et en attendannt je vous invite et remettre la classification a highway=primary en attendant.
PierZen (2025-08-06 01:14:19+00:00): voir https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/quebec-et-labrador-routes-nordiques-aux-conditions-routieres-tres-difficiles-reclassifiees-de-highway-primary-a-trunk/133737
PierZen (2025-08-14 18:38:22+00:00): Tous les participants à la discussion sur community.openstreetmap.org s'opposent à reclassifier highway=trunk. Je vais donc remettre les valeurs précédentes highway=primary pour la portion québécoise de cette route.
Himké (2025-08-15 11:36:47+00:00): La discussion est-elle déjà close ? Cela mérite également une discussion plus approfondie concernant la route TLH. Pourquoi se précipiter pour faire ce changement ?
0000FF berries (2024-11-22 23:11:41+00:00): Καλησπέρα Θοδωρή, καλώς ήρθες στο OpenStreetMap! Να'σαι καλά που βελτιώνεις τα δεδομένα :)

Είμαι ένας απο τους εθελοντές και είδα οτι ζήτησες έναν έλεγχο των αλλαγών.

Πολύ καλή αρχή! 

Ερώτηση: το κουρείο που πρόσθεσες, καταλαμβάνει όλο το κτίριο και τους ορόφους (αν υπάρχουν); Αν ναι, τότε το έχεις χαρτογραφήσει μια χαρά. Αν περιλαμβάνει τμήμα του μόνο, προτιμάμε να βάζουμε τα καταστήματα ως σημεία, μέσα στο περίγραμμα του κτιρίου.

Αν θες να δεις χαρτογραφημένα κουρεία και κομμωτήρια στην Θεσσαλονίκη (μαζί με αυτό που πρόσθεσες), δες εδώ: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1UzW

Αν έχεις οποιαδήποτε απορία, μπορείς να στείλεις μήνυμα, να ρωτήσεις στο φόρουμ για την Ελλάδα https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/gr/68 ή στο κανάλι στο Matrix https://matrix.to/#/#osm-gr:matrix.org

Καλώς ήρθες και πάλι :)
CurlingMan13 (2024-11-22 06:10:56+00:00): Reviewed as requested.  Good edit
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159421504
YellowSoul (2024-12-03 08:23:05+00:00): Hallo, wenn die Straßen noch nicht im Bau sind, bitte als highway=proposed, proposed=primary (etc.) taggen. Wenn man nur construction=primary zu proposed=primary ändert, werden sie weiterhin in der Karte dargestellt.
eggie (2024-11-21 17:36:01+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  Het zou zomaar kunnen.  Het sein komt uit de database van ProRail.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Hayleox (2024-11-21 17:22:36+00:00): *SW Ohio. Geez, you'd think I'd know east from west by now. 😛
bxl-forever (2024-11-22 13:12:41+00:00): Hello,

You retagged the cafe as a pharmacy, but I think there is an issue here because the pharmacy is the shop on the corner, and it is already on the map.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1039101045

I think the former cafe is on the part that has been walled, so it should be probably tagged as vacant, unless you saw something different.

What do you think?
olecky (2024-11-22 13:21:45+00:00): For sure the entry to the farmacy I used was from the square, not on the corner. The pharmacy might have expanded (they seemed to be in the middle of unpacking) or might have a separate entrance for night service - iirc I saw a sign with pharmacy 24h on the corner, that's why I didn't move the other pharmacy POI.
olecky (2024-11-25 08:33:04+00:00): Here's some info about the move: https://www.facebook.com/pharmacieplasky/posts/pfbid02WQ8D7ooRbMzbcS8BTbHVtUakZxhbVgRvj6NaA55HAEey3TfCWHgtfMUTRcuRHepfl
Data 7 (2024-11-25 00:24:51+00:00): Ho annullato questo changeset con questo changeset perché a mio avviso invece c'è il semaforo per i ciclisti ed è lo stesso delle macchine.
VLD302 (2024-11-26 16:32:46+00:00): Hi data 7, 

Thank you for your feedback. It is to my understanding is that cycleway crossings (the nodes and ways) should only receive the crossing=traffic_signals tag (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing) when there are dedicated signals explicitly marked for bicycles like the ones in this article https://nacto.org/publication/urban-bikeway-design-guide/bicycle-signals/bicycle-signal-heads/. This is why I used crossing=marked. However, I respect your opinion and will leave this matter as it is.
Muhmaker (2024-11-23 09:36:03+00:00): Moin. Du hast ja in den letzten Tagen einiges an Bordstein-Kanten ergänzt. Ich möchte auf ein Detail hinweisen das mir aufgefallen ist. Bei den barrier=kerb Linien kommt es auch auf die Richtung der OSM-Linie an (siehe Wiki). Eine gute Eselsbrücke ist: "Rechts der Linie geht es runter". Das ist bei deinen zuletzt eingetragenen Objekten fast überall falsch herum erfasst. Bei den geschlossenen Linien gibt es leider keine einfache Methode um die Linienrichtung umzukehren. Es ist vermutlich immer nötig kurz aufzutreffen, Richtung für beide Teile umkehren und wieder verbinden.
DeFra85 (2024-11-23 20:58:07+00:00): Ah okay. In ID sind bei Linien ja immer auf einer Seite diese Dreiecke (da wo es runter geht, bzw. wo man vor die Kante stößt?). Finde den Wiki leider nicht wirklich aussagekräftig^^. Aber bei Flächen wurden diese nicht angezeigt, deshalb dachte ich es wäre egal.
eggie (2024-11-21 19:00:05+00:00): Hoi ...

Klopt dit... Niet echt.

Zie
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:footway%3Dalley

Een highway=service is een toegangsweg voor motorvoertuigen. oa. autoverkeer. Bv een benzinestation.. een parkeerplaats. 
Het was dus in principe correct getagd.
De meest gebruikelijke tagging is momenteel. 
highway=footway
footway=alley
surface=paving_stones

en al die accesstags weg.
evt. access=permissive omdat het Eigen Terrein betreft. 

access=no wordt bijna altijd verkeerd gebruikt. 
foot=yes is default.
Op een voetpad routeert alleen een voetganger in OSM. Je hoeft dus al die accesstags niet toe te voegen.

Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=159423426

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-11-21 19:01:05+00:00): Ik draai het even terug... Dan kun je die voorgestelde tags toevoegen.
eggie (2024-11-21 19:05:20+00:00): reverted by changeset #159430537

Nu zijn het weer 'voet'paden 
Voornamelijk bedoeld voor voetgangers.
Dus highway=footway
 en je kun toevoegen 
footway=alley
surface=paving_stones
access=?  zal meestal permissive zijn, maar je kunt het ook weglaten.

Een kaartenmaker zou iets kunnen doen met die footway=alley  Bv strafpunten geven in de voorkeur.
Niemand wil graag routeren via brandgangen.
upc92 (2024-11-26 10:19:12+00:00): 😈 Do not edit me: 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159608456
citrula (2024-11-21 22:50:54+00:00): Welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contribution. I have reviewed your change and it looks good to me!
Tonias95 (2024-11-21 17:42:17+00:00): actualizado
Allison P (2024-11-24 07:34:45+00:00): You accidentally dragged this node, causing the road to overlap the lodge. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/126949559
habi (2024-11-22 10:58:09+00:00): Adding a node with only a note is not ideal, when in addition you've added https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4528348
I'll thus remove this node with only the note-tag.
woodpeck_repair (2024-11-21 18:32:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159429068 where the changeset comment is: reverted edit warring, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16882
CurlingMan13 (2024-11-22 05:19:37+00:00): Looks like an account was created to evade a user block.

New account:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/JackSparrow1984
woodpeck (2024-11-22 09:11:10+00:00): The new account "JackSparrow1984" has performed a number of deletions which will be reverted. Creating sock puppet accounts in order to circumvent our moderation mechanisms is against our rules. The account has also added access=private to a number of ways which I will not revert because it at least demonstrates a level of understanding. The local community is encouraged to verify the claims of private access though.
Baloo Uriza (2024-11-21 19:01:17+00:00): Changeset comments could be more descriptive.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159428292
woodpeck_repair (2024-11-21 18:32:21+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 159427892, 159427899, 159427905, 159427912, 159427926.
mcliquid (2024-11-21 19:11:16+00:00): Mega gut!
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-11-23 04:06:43+00:00): This  changeset deleted a road segment.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1074726609
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159430871
rskedgell (2024-11-21 23:47:49+00:00): Please stop tagging mapping for the renderer. Reverted in 159430998
rskedgell (2024-11-21 23:50:39+00:00): Sorry, reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159439095

If there is no physical separation between carriageways, don't add a fictitious separation on the map because you think it looks nicer.

Mini roundabouts are NOT roundabouts, do not map them as if they were. Different rules apply.
SomeoneElse (2024-11-22 00:11:41+00:00): I have to say, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/29027798/history does look like a mini-roundabout rather than an actual roundabout on the imagery (unless that's out of date, of course).
Perhaps this would have been a good candidate for asking about at the forum https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/uk/86 first?  Sometimes what's mapped does need changing (the bus gate mapped by another mapper as a police checkpoint in the other changeset might be an example of that) and sometimes it might not (here, unless the road's changed).
"how to map things" in OSM can be tricky, and we all make mistakes at first (well I certainly did), so sometimes it helps to ask.
Metzor (2024-11-21 20:01:17+00:00): Danke!
Langlaeufer (2024-11-22 13:37:27+00:00): Vorsicht, du hast hier foot=use_sidewalk an einen Weg mit sidewalk:right=yes gesetzt. ich korrigiere es.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159431155
Langlaeufer (2024-11-22 13:42:41+00:00): kannst ja mal schauen ob es so stimmt, meist war sidewalk:right=yes falsch https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159459604
streetuser (2024-11-26 08:30:54+00:00): Danke für die Kontrolle und Korrektur.
ivanbranco (2025-06-12 10:23:03+00:00): Hi voltairovicz,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12362594588
I noticed you took the circumference value from here:
https://crfop.gdos.gov.pl/CRFOP/widok/viewpomnikprzyrody.jsf?fop=PL.ZIPOP.1393.PP.1425033.2489

Just a heads-up: the site uses centimetres as the default unit, while OSM expects metres for circumference.
I've corrected it—thanks, and happy mapping!
voltairovicz (2025-06-12 10:49:17+00:00): Thank you very much. Yes, I noticed that some time ago when using mapy.com I discovered a tree with diameter 450 m ;)
CurlingMan13 (2024-11-22 06:08:36+00:00): Good edit
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159432218
Metzor (2024-11-21 21:09:26+00:00): Hallo Radbubi!

Ich würde mich über aussagekräftig Änderungskommentare von dir freuen :-)

Gibt schon Leute, die das lesen ;-)

Fröhliches Kartieren!
Metzor
Radbubi (2024-11-21 21:33:56+00:00): Ok, damit habe ich tatsächlich nicht gerechnet. In dem Fall hätte ich das präzisieren können, aber meist ist es so, dass es Änderungen unterschiedlichster Art sind, was die Kommentierung entsprechend erschwert.
Gruß