piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2025-05-21 06:19:20+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  Volgens mij zijn die andere paden er ook niet. De voorgaande mapper staat bekend als een armchairmapper die doorlopend overal paden tekent die er in werkelijkheid vaak niet zijn. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-05-21 06:25:57+00:00): Nog even met een aantal recente luchtfoto's gekeken.  Er zijn hier geen doorlopende wandelpaden. Ik heb ze verwijderd. Er zijn wel 'basic' brugoversteekjes.
MVG
eggie
SafwatHalaby (2025-05-21 11:30:40+00:00):  שלום ותודה על הדיווח. מה קרה לחניון ומה יש במקומו עכשיו?

להבא - הדבר הנכון לעשות זה למחוק את הנקודה או להחליף אותה בנקודה אחרת, ולא לכתוב "לא קיים בתיאור"

שינוי אפשר ממפת הטיולים הפתוחה. אני לא בטוח שאפשר מחיקה משם, אבל כן אפשר מ- https://www.openstreetmap.org/
literan (2025-05-21 20:10:28+00:00): не надо вносить дубли существующих остановок, и тем более, ставить точки остановко на станции электричек. Такой правке доверия нет, она будет откачена целиком
Nap1 (2025-05-21 21:14:02+00:00): Накопившиеся за 2 года правки подгрузились при входе в аккаунт - за это время некоторые уже успели внести другие люди.
nevw (2025-10-28 06:17:03+00:00): Hi, we do not have permission to use the QTopo map for mapping in osm.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Data_Sources#Queensland
nevw (2025-11-04 21:15:39+00:00): New sources have become available to us 
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/qld-dnrmmrrd-cc-by-waiver/137587
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-07-14 13:26:49+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4905393
Mm211368@ (2025-05-31 20:51:39+00:00):  Hi
nevw (2025-05-22 03:48:37+00:00): Hi, multipolygons cannot share sides.
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=149.11601&lat=-35.25470&zoom=19
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon
chl-osm (2025-05-21 15:10:08+00:00): This changeset looks like a test. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sandbox_for_editing and, for example, use https://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ instead.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166573898
wasabeee (2025-05-21 22:23:06+00:00): I’m sorry.I mistook it for test.
Thanks you for letting me know.
GerdP (2025-05-21 17:04:24+00:00): Moin aus Wildeshausen!
Ich sehe, Du mappst zur Zeit auch viele Knotenpunkt-Routen. Könntest Du bei der Gelegenheit bitte auch drauf achten, ob die Radroute "BahnRadRoute Weser - Lippe " noch irgendwo ausgeschildert ist?
Im LK Diepholz wurden fast alle Marker entfernt, die nicht mehr ausgeschilderten Teile entferne ich entsprechend aus den Relationen.
eggie (2025-05-21 06:38:17+00:00): Dag Sensor,
 in OS
Alleen een naam doet niets in OSM. Ik heb autoschadebedrijf toegevoegd (car_repair) 
CTRL f5 voor het effect.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-05-21 06:39:25+00:00): Gebruik svp name=...  ipv description=... voor namen.
eggie (2025-05-21 06:36:28+00:00): Dag Sensor, De info heb ik weer verwijderd. Die staat immers op de adresnode. shop=car_repair toegevoegd.
MVG
eggie
Sensor (2025-05-21 07:10:12+00:00): Beste eggie,
Dank voor de hulp! Dus info over de naam van een bedrijf moet niet bij het gebouw, maar bij het adres-node, klopt dat?
MVG,
Sensor
eggie (2025-05-21 07:24:19+00:00): Dag Sensor... Dat laatste inderdaad.
Het staat nu goed.
CTRL-f5 dan zal de naam wel tevoorschijn komen.

MVG
eggie
Kovoschiz (2025-05-21 06:58:50+00:00): Please avoid creating `=multipolygon` for a single simple shape. It's inefficient and resource-intensive, unnecessary complication, and not entirely editing-friendly.
pavvv (2025-05-21 08:57:20+00:00): A po co to rozdzielanie dróg? Wystarczyło utworzyć relację.
maro21 (2025-05-23 20:51:50+00:00): Edytor chyba sam tak robi, bo w iD też tak jest.
Timmy_Tesseract (2025-05-21 13:17:41+00:00): Good evening.

OpenStreetMap is a community project. We're all trying to make a better map and we have to work together to achieve this. 

There are well established guidelines on how we map different things in OSM. If you want to be a part of this project you really have to familiarize yourself with these mapping conventions and if other mappers point out issues with your edits it's expected from you that you either respond to the concerns or at least change the part of your mapping that is problematic.

I have reached out to you about this several times on your previous account through private messages and changeset comments (for example here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166054144).

Many of your contribtutions are really awesome and a huge improvement for OSM. But please reflect on the following issues:

- Change road classifications only on case-by-case basis, if you're considering upgrading 50 different roads at the same time it is more likely that you misunderstand the classification system than that the classifications are wrong

- Use proper changeset comments, describe with a few words what you did, "local knowlege" should go to the source field instead (or better 
"ground survey" if you visited a place in person). (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments)

- For tagging about who or what a feature is named after you should use name:etymology:wikidata/wikipedia. The normal wikidata/wikipedia tags are for pages about the object itself (for example https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q56283912).

- For streets the main name tag should contain the name that is commonly used on signage, for addresses or in everyday language e.g. "General Santos Drive". More complex long forms that are only rarely used e.g. "General Paulino T. Santos Sr. Drive" are more suitable for official_name tag.

- Residential=gated is not a very helpful tag. If an area is gated can already be seen by the presence of gates and access tags. Both gated and open subdivisions come in different forms which can be described with residential=urban/rural/single_family and more (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:residential).

Apologies for this message being very long, but given the large volume of your edits this was somewhat unavoidable. 

I would be really glad to hear back from you! 

By the way if you're not comfortable writing in English, feel free to reply in Bisaya, Tagalog, Ilongo or whatever language you prefer ;)
Fizzie-DWG (2025-05-30 05:28:29+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166952470
nona mostafa (2025-05-25 13:49:23+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1388446223
Do you have any official source confirming that the road has already been built or is still among the roads planned to be built?
Best regards,
nona mostafa
Cyrille37 (2025-05-25 16:33:33+00:00): Hi
I have tagged the "ref=RN4" as a "highway=track + proposed=primary" but @Amineee__ changed it to "highway=primary".

My source are
- ESRI imagery (public version in JOSM)
- and the 2025 update from CNER https://map.comptoir.net/maroc-reseau-routier-2025-01/
nona mostafa (2025-05-26 12:38:57+00:00): Hi Cyrille37,
I need to share my information with you about the "proposed tag."
When using a tag "proposed=primary" it must be used with highway=proposed.
But when used  "highway=track" Added only without the proposed tag,
because the tag "proposed" can be used for any feature that is still in the planning phase, but construction hasn't yet started
But "highway=track" is used for minor land-access roads that are not considered part of the general-purpose road network
You can see this Page
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:proposed
If you have different information, please share with me or fix this issue
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1388446223
Best regards,
nona mostafa
Cyrille37 (2025-05-26 12:52:41+00:00): Hi Nona

You are right.

Can you tell me how I have to tag to make a road available to use but not as an "easy" road ? Like it is a "piste" but official status is "primary", "secondary" or "tertiary" ?

I had made such tagging that I will correct when I will know the right way.

Thanks for your helpful comments which help me :-)
nona mostafa (2025-05-27 06:30:44+00:00): Hi Cyrille37,
I am always happy to communicate with you. The "surface=ground" has already been added to the street. It will serve your purpose.
I believe that the road classification should be "highway=track" and added in this relation: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1827491 a "highway=primary" tag so that users can recognize this track as part of a primary-rated relationship, with the proposed=primary tag removed. I think this is the best way to represent it. If you have another perspective, please share it with me.
Best regards,
nona mostafa
Cyrille37 (2025-05-27 06:57:18+00:00): Hi Nona,
I've made change to osm.org/way/1388446223 and osm.org/relation/1827491
Can you check if I well understood your proposition.
Thanks
Cyrille37 (2025-05-27 07:42:14+00:00): Also, to refine the tagging schema:
- for the new RP6105
- In CNER SHP the "ordreArc=11" is tagged as "etat=-1" that should be tagged as "proposed" in OSM
- But the way "highway=track" exists in OSM

Do you have an idea on how should I tag it to keep the way as "highway=track" and add the "proposed" official reference "ref=RP6105" ?

sorry if I'm too picky ;-)
nona mostafa (2025-05-27 13:39:35+00:00): Hi Cyrille37,
Thank you for your contribution to OSM.
That's exactly what I meant here. Thank you for your cooperation.
osm.org/way/1388446223 and osm.org/relation/1827491
As for "ref=RP6105"
If the road is still planned for construction, when using a tag "proposed=*", it must be used with highway=proposed.
But "highway=track" is used for minor land-access roads that are not considered part of the general-purpose road network
I believe that the road classification should be "highway=unclassified" and added in this relation
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19179536
Best regards,
nona mostafa
Cyrille37 (2025-05-29 08:23:57+00:00): Hi Nona
Like I'm a bit confused, I continue the discussion via osm messaging system ;-)
Till_btn (2025-05-23 06:35:42+00:00): Hi, warst du vor Ort? Ich bin mir relativ sicher, dass das hier 21 und 21a sind

Viele Grüße
Till
FriedhelmLG (2025-05-24 12:10:28+00:00): Hallo Till_btn,
danke für deinen Hinweis.
Ja ich war vor Ort, am südlichen Gebäude konnte ich keine Hausnr. finden. Da beide Gebäude auf einem Flurstück stehen, habe ich vermutet, dass beide die selbe Hausnr. haben.

Du schreibst: Du bist dir relativ sicher. Hast du weitere Informationen?
Till_btn (2025-05-24 13:46:14+00:00): Ich war vor ca. einem Jahr mal dort und hatte mir einen Hinweis "21a" erstellt, den ich beim Abarbeiten wohl übersehen habe. Zumindest zu dem Zeitpunkt war also eine Nummer vorhanden.
Meinst du ein Flurstück aus dem Liegenschaftskataster? Die Daten sind nicht für OSM freigegeben und vor Ort lässt sich sowas ja eigentlich nicht bestimmen
Till_btn (2025-05-25 08:23:09+00:00): Die Adresse ist auch auf Mapillary erkennbar, habe sie jetzt korrigiert

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=53.2790428&lng=10.4505298&z=17&focus=photo&pKey=285655120884141&x=0.5075575223792619&y=0.46325277303171764&zoom=1.6355140186915886
eggie (2025-05-21 08:51:05+00:00): Wanneer er een C12 bord staat met onderbord dan is het volgens mij moped en mofa=yes en niet destination.
motorcycle en motorcar hoeft niet apart getagd te worden als motor_vehicle=destination is getagd. 


Het zal formeel een unclassified zijn als er geen woningen langs staan.
MVG
eggie
vakantieland dot nl (2025-05-21 09:58:19+00:00): Er staan in dit geval wel woningen langs. Kunnen moped en mofa niet sneller dan 25 km/h? Indien ze sneller kunnen dan 25 km/h dan worden ze door bord C12 toch ook geblokkeerd.
eggie (2025-05-21 10:04:20+00:00): Nee...   bromfietsen en snorfietsen vallen niet onder motorvoertuigen volgens de wegenverkeerswet.. al hebben ze wel een motortje. 
OSM handelt echter moped en mofa wel af als motorvoertuigen.. vandaar dat we die categorie op =yes zetten.
Elk land heeft zo z'n eigen verkeerswetten. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-05-21 10:06:07+00:00): Hier de laatste discussie https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/wie-kan-het-beter-uitleggen-wel-of-geen-brommers-en-snorfietsen-langs-c12-bord/129454

Het komt steeds weer terug omdat mappers denken dat moped/mofa onder C12 vallen en dat is niet zo.
Groet
eggie
vakantieland dot nl (2025-05-21 10:20:45+00:00): Aha, de eenvoudige uitleg van informatiebord.nl is onjuist:
"Deze weg is afgesloten voor alle voertuigen die een motor hebben en sneller dan 25 kilometer per uur kunnen, behalve (elektrische) fietsen."
Conclusie: bromfietsen mogen doorrijden bij bord C12.
eggie (2025-05-21 10:25:15+00:00): Yep... te eenvoudig  😀
eggie (2025-05-21 10:34:24+00:00): Ik heb het aangepast mofa=yes ipv destination.
vakantieland dot nl (2025-05-21 10:35:49+00:00): Merci.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-05-21 07:30:54+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8633119001

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Taya_S (2025-05-22 12:20:31+00:00): Removed SEO spam

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166610676
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-05-21 23:42:43+00:00): The geometry and turn restrictions are incorrect. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1388447167
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166553933
NorthCrab_upload (2025-05-21 07:40:48+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12852485018

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2025-05-21 07:40:49+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12852494503

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Tobi274 (2025-05-21 07:42:50+00:00): Adam-Güthlein-Straße
SafwatHalaby (2025-05-21 11:41:06+00:00): All of this user's changes up to this have been reverted. Discussion here: osm.org/changeset/157482706
SafwatHalaby (2025-05-21 11:41:22+00:00): All of this user's changes up to this have been reverted. Discussion here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157482706
MxxCon (2025-05-27 16:01:29+00:00): Hello.
You really should not be hand-drawing outlines of trees' canopies and deleting tree nodes.
That's called https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer and that's inappropriate.
Tree canopies change as trees grow, with seasons as they lose and gain leaves and as their branches break or get trimmed. So your mapping becomes inaccurate with each season. However, trees themselves remain where their nodes are.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166554429
catgirlseraid (2025-05-27 19:42:59+00:00): Hi,

I deleted tree nodes where their location was incorrect such as the middle of a pathway, grass field or in an area with more than one tree represented by a single node where i could not tell where the base of the rest of the trees are. I did my best i could with the available resources, but OSM is a team effort! If you're able to make out individual trees please do replace then with nodes.

Thanks, Phoebe
TrickyFoxy (2025-05-21 22:38:07+00:00): 👋 В правом меню редактора есть кнопка «Настройки фонового изображения». Выберите там спутниковые снимки ESRI — они свежее
vasony (2025-05-28 19:54:45+00:00): Szia!

Zrínyi Miklós utca 43/A vagy 43 A épület? Mert így szóközzel biztos nem jó. Ha utóbbi, akkor addr:housenumber=43 + addr:unit=A

Tamás
Kilencfarku Macska (2025-05-29 06:40:46+00:00): Szia!

A helyszínen "A épület", stb van megírva.
Áttettem unitba.

Balázs
olo81 (2025-05-21 22:55:30+00:00): Nazwa opisowa do zmiany 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Nazwy
Dlaczego wyciołeś nazwę firmy? 
Openstreetmaps to nie mapa historyczna. 
Jak już chcesz takie dodawać to rób to poprawnie a nie kasuj rzeczywistych danych.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-21 23:37:36+00:00): wycofane

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166589485
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-21 23:55:30+00:00): 1) nie kasuj informacji co jest tam teraz

2) opis wieku budynku nie jest jego nazwą

3) to że coś jest zabytkiem zaznaczamy inaczej (patrz https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:heritage - jak coś jest niejasne to daj znać, możesz poprosić o pomoc na oficjalnym forum na https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/pl/40 )
rempshaener (2025-05-21 14:46:23+00:00): Hallo,
und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.
Ein kleiner Hinweis: Hydranten sollten nicht mit Straßen verbunden werden, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12852502289
Das lässt sich schnell beheben: im Editor „E“ drücken und der Hydrant löst sich von der Straße.
Viele Grüße
SafwatHalaby (2025-05-21 11:42:41+00:00): All of this user's changes up to this have been reverted. Discussion here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157482706
Taya_S (2025-05-22 12:20:53+00:00): Removed SEO spam

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166610688
Taya_S (2025-05-22 12:20:54+00:00): Removed SEO spam

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166610688
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-05-21 23:36:37+00:00): Not needed since it was already the only possibility.
amitshrivastava_lyft (2025-05-23 16:14:23+00:00): Hi UrbanRoaming! 

My name is Amit, and I’m a mapper in the OSM team at Lyft.
Thank you very much for bringing this to our attention. I have corrected the link, and all my team members have verified the information in their profiles. Thank you once again.

Best regards, Amit
YuliyaShustava_lyft (2025-05-27 09:42:04+00:00): Hi, Spaghetti Monster! 

My name is Yuliya, and I am the Quality Control Lead on the OSM team at Lyft.
Regrettably, Amit's previous response does not pertain to your comment and was sent in error.
Thank you very much for bringing the unnecessary revision to our attention and for removing the relation. We have informed our entire team about this case to prevent such mapping in the future. We apologize for any inconvenience caused by our revision or our previous response to your comment.

Happy mapping, Yuliya
ralley (2025-05-27 00:26:54+00:00): Manukau Harbour has been correctly tagged as relation 8534169 for 7 years.  This looks more like tagging for the renderer.  Also is "Second-hand Books" the actual name (looks to be a description) or is it "The Open Book" as per https://theopenbook.co.nz/ ?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166555473
perusluku (2025-05-21 08:14:34+00:00): Hi, old node is already moved there (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3612497706), just not operational yet.
Tjukanovt (2025-05-21 08:26:28+00:00): Ah sorry! Thanks for noticing! Will delete
Taya_S (2025-05-22 12:20:18+00:00): Removed SEO spam

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166610665
Alexey Vazhnov (2025-06-01 14:38:53+00:00): @Myshor, but it has a ramp, right? This one: https://osm.org/way/1391379192
Myshor (2025-06-01 16:49:16+00:00): Yes... There is separate ramp. I had a question about stairs in StreetComplete so the stairs didn't have any ramp on themselves.
Alexey Vazhnov (2025-06-01 17:01:46+00:00): Got it, thanks!
I recommend you to read this page https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:ramp 

And in common, please use the wiki as a source of truth if you're planning to edit OSM a lot. I see you're very active, it is good, we need more active mappers!

Thank you for contributing!
Myshor (2025-06-01 17:07:27+00:00): I will check if I can select separate somehow in StreetComplete next time... If not I will try to make the edit after a walk by myself to include the way described on shared wiki page. Thanks.
MxxCon (2025-05-27 16:05:08+00:00): Hello again.
You tagged entranced to this fort(currently under repair) as natural=scrub. This doesn't seem correct..🤔
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166556945
MxxCon (2025-05-27 16:25:57+00:00): This is the feature that you tagged as scrub: https://www.hmdb.org/PhotoFullSize.asp?PhotoID=572505
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166556945
catgirlseraid (2025-05-27 19:48:18+00:00): Hi,

The photo you sent appears to be from 2007, and using latest aerial imagery that area seems to be covered in scrub now under the scaffolding, which i chose not to tag as its a temporary feature. If you have more modern images of the entrance, preferably without the scaffolding in the way, which i wasn't able to find, please do retag this area.

Thanks, Phoebe
MxxCon (2025-05-27 16:10:25+00:00): Hello.
Please note that this edit is incorrect.
These are retaining walls of a moat around this fort. These features do not raise above the ground level.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dretaining_wall
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dcity_wall
This edit should be corrected/reverted.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166557023
MxxCon (2025-05-27 16:11:59+00:00): I see you already corrected this in the following edit. 👍😅
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166557023
chris66 (2025-09-06 07:26:24+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/386899215
Noch immer gesperrt?
ChrissW-R1 (2025-10-02 19:56:39+00:00): War jetzt schon eine Weile nicht mehr dort. Daher kann ich es gerade nicht sicher sagen.
SomeoneElse (2025-10-31 21:54:29+00:00): I'm guessing that "crossing:signals=Tufnell Park" on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/968619222 is a typo :)
rskedgell (2025-11-01 12:44:29+00:00): Oh dear, that's embarrassing. Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174060418
NeisRevert (2025-05-21 16:23:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/166576872 where the changeset comment is: 
Remove vandalism
NeisBot (2025-05-23 07:54:52+00:00): Hello, thank you for your contribution.

Your changeset was commented because it appears to follow a pattern that could be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related.

Could you kindly confirm if your map edits were intentional?

#MapWithoutSpam #Name #Comment
silversurfer83 (2025-05-21 19:26:19+00:00): Hi

hab mir den Vorplatz der Uni mal angesehen und bin der Meinung, dass der eigentlich weg kann. Etwas sauberer die diversen Wege erfassen und gut ists, in meinen Augen.Die Rasenflächen könnten wegen mir noch abgezeichnet werden, aber ein "place=square" im Sinne von OSM ist das nicht.

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166557883
eggie (2025-05-21 09:16:28+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  Alle begin is moeilijk. Waarom zou een brandgang opeens een fietspad zijn. Waarom heeft die geen verbindingen meer met de kopse voetpaden. 
Waarom is die nieuwe fietsverbinding eenrichtingsverkeer. Dat is niet geloofwaardig. 
name= Voetpad/fietspad is geen straatnaam. Uit de tagging cycleway kun je zioen dat iets een fietspad is. Welk bord staat hier? 
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=166558056

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community