piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
amtplskaart (2025-10-23 02:38:41+00:00): For the highway classification, indeed, some are based on physical characteristics (such as width and surface), while others are based on function. Specifically for "living_street" and "path", this has been a topic of discussion among local contributors in Indonesia.

When I first started contributing to OSM, I shared the same view as you — that roads with such characteristics should be classified as "path". However, as I continued observing and interacting with other local contributors, my perspective changed. I later switched to using "living_street" instead of "path" for narrow alleyways around one meter wide.

These small one-meter-wide roads are indeed not physically suitable to be categorized as a "street" in the general sense. But in the Indonesian context, "living_street" serves as a middle ground between the "residential" and "path" classifications. For "residential", we have a common understanding without much disagreement. As for "path", according to the documentation on the wiki, it is not compatible with motorized vehicle use (unless explicitly allowed). A "path" is usually unpaved and not located within a residential area.

This seems to be a special case in Indonesia, where in everyday life, we find many narrow roads that are in fact part of residential areas. Residents use motorcycles to access these areas, and delivery services also use these narrow lanes to deliver goods, either as destinations or shortcuts. This appears to be something quite unique to Indonesia. As a result, in major cities, most local contributors now tend to use "living_street" as a compromise — a middle category bridging "residential" and "path".

This topic has been discussed multiple times in the Indonesian local contributor community forum, but we have not yet reached a final decision — whether to adopt "living_street" with certain exceptions or wait for the "alleyway" proposal.

In the case of this changeset, I see that way 724491805 is still within a residential area and used by people riding motorcycles. For way 251887610, I agree that it should be reclassified as "path".
Protoxenus (2023-03-16 17:34:41+00:00): Hallo, pass bitte auf, was du da tust. Einbahnstraßen müssen in die richtige Richtung verlaufen, sonst ist ein Routing nicht möglich.
Gruß Protoxenus
Vera_D (2023-03-17 07:42:40+00:00): Guten Tag! Ja, du hast natürlich recht. Vielen Dank für diesen Fehler. Ich werde vorsichtiger sein. Einen schönen Tag noch!
------------------------------------
Good afternoon Thanks for pointing out this error! I will be more careful. Have a good day!
ivanbranco (2023-03-16 09:38:40+00:00): Hi Kadubei,

can I ask you why you duplicate multilingual names in waterway ways that are already part of a waterway relation?

Such as here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/69904069/history
which is already part of this relation:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9612817/history

One of the main purposes of the waterways relations is precisely to avoid info duplication, I quote from the Wiki: "The purpose is to have only one element with all common informations about this watercourse (name in different languages, wikidata, wikipedia, ref, destination) instead of having these informations on each way (with probably some ways with missing informations)."
user_16642036 (2023-03-18 17:44:43+00:00): The "name"-tag was already in the way before my edit. I just added the names in other languages. The name-tags were already there and its not in my hand to decide if they should be removed. So you should rather contact the person, who initially added the name-tag to this way. I would not remove them without consent, but if you are in the opinion, they should be removed, you can do this.
Q-OSM (2023-04-24 16:54:31+00:00): Modifications éxécrables de la part d'un élève. Revert effectué.
Devdatta (2023-03-20 07:24:43+00:00): Why is your OSM changeset so big? Please limit it to a smaller area: http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Also keep a meaningful Changeset message.
Devdatta (2023-03-20 07:25:24+00:00): Please Ignore my message
MichS (2023-03-15 16:55:18+00:00): Hallo.

Du kennst dich dort aus, gut! Wenn du Hilfe brauchst, melde dich.

Jeoch ist der Hausname kaum Andl oder?

MFG
ivanatora (2023-03-16 08:01:24+00:00): Моля, слагайте по-описателни коментари на changeset-овете.
flohoff (2023-03-15 14:08:56+00:00): Moin,
das mit dem operator ist glaube ich hier falsch. "Operator" ist ja der "Betreiber" d.h. der ALDI Parkplatz bekommt ein "operator=ALDI".

Facharzt für Innere Medizin würde ich eher im "description" tag sehen.

Flo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133705721
MichS (2023-03-15 16:58:48+00:00): Hier stimmt der tagging nicht. 3 Stockwerke über, vielleicht, eine Firma?
Thomas Liebing (2023-03-19 14:11:52+00:00): Großer Teil des Gebäudes: Scheune
kleiner Teil (mit der #): Wohnhaus mit 2 Vollgeschossen, 1 Dachgeschoß, im Keller (zum Hof ebenerdig) war mal ein Reifendienst.
PT-53 (2023-03-16 08:26:03+00:00): Hallo Franz-Peter Scherer,
Du hast jetzt die Firmen-Daten vom POI-Knoten auf das Gebäude übertragen. Grund ist, daß der Firmen-Namen auf dem POI-Knoten nicht auf "der Karte" angezeigt wird, ein Name auf dem Gebäudeumriß aber schon.

Da die Praxis aber nur einen Teil des Gebäudes einnimmt, ist es nicht akzeptabel, den POI-Knoten zu löschen und die Firmen-Daten auf den Gebäudeumriß einzutragen.
Das nennt man Tagging für den Renderer und ist in OSM absolut verpönt. Ich habe Deine Änderung daher wieder zurückgesetzt.

Nochmals mein Hinweis auf:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:OpenStreetMap_benutzen#Karten_f%C3%BCr_eigene_Internetseite

Bitte unterlasse künftig solche "falsche Eingaben". Anderfalls werde ich eine Sperre für Dich beantragen.

Grüße
Franz-Peter Scherer (2023-03-16 08:38:33+00:00): Danke für die Info. Werde mein Konto löschen. Hat eh keinen Wert. Wünsche euch weiterhin viel Erfolg.
PT-53 (2023-03-16 08:43:52+00:00): Beleidigte Leberwurst?
Schade

Ich habe gerade im OSM-Forum eine Anfrage eingestellt, wie man Dein Problem lösen kann:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/anzeige-eines-praxis-names-auf-einer-osm-karte-auf-der-homepage-der-praxis/96967
Du kannst Dich dort mit Deinem OSM-Account einloggen.
PT-53 (2023-04-02 06:40:42+00:00): Hallo Franz-Peter Scherer, 
hier noch 2 Beispiele, wie das aussehen kann:
Gemeinde Wolfegg:
https://www.wolfegg.de/gemeinde-wolfegg/wirtschaft-gewerbe/wolfegger-gewerbebetriebe
Gemeinde Uttenweiler:
https://www.uttenweiler.de/wirtschaft-
gewerbe/
Grüße
skyper (2023-03-23 19:16:55+00:00): Hallo Vera,
hier stimmen die ganzen Werte von `lanes=`, `lanes:forward=` und `lanes:backward=` nun nicht mehr. Zusätzlich hast Du alle 26 Route-Relationen beschädigt und fehlen am Übergang von getrennten Fahrtrichtungen zu Straßen mit Gegenverkehr nicht noch Abbiegebeschränkungen?
Schaust Du Dir das bitte noch mal an und korrigierst die Fehler. Danke

Fragende Grüße,
skyper
Vera_D (2023-03-27 16:53:47+00:00): Hi skyper!

I have fixed bus relations and roundabout leg's tags. But I have no ground truth sources to check my changeset. 
Could you please check this!

Best regards
skyper (2023-03-27 22:06:52+00:00): Hello Vera,
I am sorry but https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/134186550 do not help much.
The members of most route relations including `route=road` and `route=bus` + `public_transport:version=2` need to be ordered by connectivity. Please, carefully read the wiki, e.g. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:route and the linked pages.

Sorry, I have no on-the-ground information but regarding the `lanes` tags, it is quiet unusual to have `lanes:forward` and `lanes:backward`. From the Maxar images it looked like `lanes=1` for all involved way and that's what I chose but if in doubt deleting all lanes tag after a reconstruction is better than keeping wrong, outdated information.

I have fixed all errors in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/134195299 but next time please work more carefully and/or leave the complex situations for a colleague with more mapping experience and hopefully some knowledge of JOSM and route relations.

Take care,
skyper
Vera_D (2023-03-28 15:38:57+00:00): Thanks for your corrections and for the clarifications. This will help improve my mapping.

With gratitude, Vera
ovruni (2023-03-16 03:28:36+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambios se ha agregado una vía que al revisar con Maxar superpone parte de edificios.
Saludos
agranizo (2023-03-16 10:13:40+00:00): Vías modificadas
agranizo (2023-03-16 10:15:18+00:00): Vía fue modificadas, alineadas a las imagenes de Maxar.
mavl (2023-03-24 10:29:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 134051515, 134045911, 134058112 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible source - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6981].
Langlaeufer (2023-03-15 14:16:32+00:00): Hello Yana,
I don't see any improvement here. 
a) The entrances do not start at the pedestrian crossings. I've already adjusted that.
b) Are you sure this is a roundabout? In Germany, it must be identified by traffic signs what I can't verify without street_images.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133706855
Langlaeufer (2023-03-15 14:24:05+00:00): concerning b)
the roundabout seems to have the right of way and it has the correct oneway direction. So junction= roundabout seems to be o.k.
Yana Lauryk (2023-03-15 14:33:15+00:00): Hello!
Thanks for you comment! I'll pay more attention to the pedestrian crossings in the future.
MichS (2023-03-15 16:36:40+00:00): Hallo.

OSM ist keine Werbeplattform. Bitte solche nicht eintragen. Es kann gelöscht werden.

MFG
SomeoneElse (2023-03-15 20:06:32+00:00): For completeness, the discussion about where this feature is is on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133692132 .
bkil (2023-03-15 14:02:48+00:00): Köszönjük a javításokat. Szabadna kérnünk, hogy a jövőben kisebb területek legyenek külön-külön feltöltve és amennyiben lehetséges a szándék szerint kitöltött változáscsomag megjegyzéssel, hogy mások is jobban megérthessék, hogy mi történt?
adamsc (2023-03-16 20:36:20+00:00): Droga jest otwarta. Wbrew wcześniejszym zapowiedziom nie ma nawet jednego znaku sugerującego, że droga jest zamknięta lub będzie zamknięta w najbliższym czasie. Póki co jedynie autobusy jeżdżą inną trasą.

Monitoruję na bieżąco.
Tomek | Yanosik (2023-03-17 07:18:29+00:00): Dziękuję za informację i korektę edycji. Pozdrawiam
NieWnen (2023-03-17 16:03:46+00:00): https://www.facebook.com/groups/313150136134753/permalink/1355370125246077/
wkdgs (2023-03-16 09:29:58+00:00): Hi,

so wie es aktuell gemappt ist, ist eventuell nicht ganz klar warum die Straße und der Fußweg getrennt sind.

Kannst du ein "noexit=yes" an den letzten Punkt der Straße hinzufügen? Damit kann man sofort erkennen, dass man von der Straße aus den Fußweg nicht erreichen kann. Siehe:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:noexit

Du könntest auch zusätzlich den Zaun einzeichnen:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:barrier%3Dfence
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133707259
MichS (2023-03-15 16:32:33+00:00): Hallo.

Telefonnummern bitte mit +49 wie im wiki beschrieben eintragen.

MFG
joost schouppe (2023-05-09 19:49:13+00:00): Even aanvullen dat de gemeente aangeeft dat dit inderdaad Seminariewegel is. Ik heb nog nagevraagd waarom ze dit dan niet toekennen als straatnaam in CRAB. Alleszins geven ze aan dat dit een trage weg is, dus misschien moet het wegtype aangepast worden
mavl (2023-03-24 10:30:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 134051515, 134045911, 134058112 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible source - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6981].
eggie (2023-03-15 14:15:53+00:00): Welkom bij OSM.. 
Bedankt voor uw bijdrage.. 
De info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode.
MVG
eggie
Hkp59 (2023-03-21 08:23:16+00:00): Bedankt! Wat mij opvalt is dat de nieuwe toevoeging niet op mijn iPhone te zien is, maar wel op mijn iPad. (Allebei up-to-date). Bovendien is het huisnummer niet te zien in het blok. Is voor deze dingen een verklaring?
Mvg
eggie (2023-03-21 10:13:39+00:00): Dag Hk  Voor het eerste geen verklaring of het 'moet' met de verversing van het browserscherm te maken hebben. 
Op een pc doe je dan F5 en/of CTRL-F5.. Van een iPhone weet ik het even niet.
https://www.appletips.nl/pagina-verversen-safari/

Zodra er een tag als shop=  op de adresnode staat zie je niet meer het nummer, maar wel het symbool. Het adres  is uiteraard wel vindbaar.
De meeste kaarten laten overigens geen adressen zien. De standaardkaart is een uitzondering. 

MVG
eggie
Hkp59 (2023-03-21 11:37:56+00:00): Nog een nadere verduidelijking. Het betreft de Maps.me app. Op de iPad wel, maar op de iPhone niet te zien. Ook zoeken naar het adres levert niets op op de iPhone. Op de website werkt het op beiden wel.
Mvg
eggie (2023-03-21 11:47:10+00:00): Dan heb ik geen verklaring.
In OSM zelf wordt een mutatie direct doorgevoerd. 
De standaardkaart werkt het snelst in rendering. Andere kaarten en apps doen er langer over.
In maps.me zal het wachten zijn op een update.
Vraagje voor het forum van osm denk ik.
Groet
eggie
eggie (2023-03-21 11:49:49+00:00): https://community.openstreetmap.org/

Dan even doorklikken naar Nederland.

Hier kun je evt je vraag stellen..
MxxCon (2023-03-16 02:13:00+00:00): Hello.
Please note that citibike stations, just like bus stops should have street names fully spelled out. Not "St" but "Street", not "Ave" but "Avenue".
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133708133
NorthCrab_upload (2023-03-15 12:40:25+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9418571365
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1091759217

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Mister Kanister (2023-03-16 11:37:52+00:00): Hi, are you sure *both* buildings have housenumber 37? Usually there should be only one building per number. Also, you spelled Bulles wrong in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/792607731
Ddzz (2023-03-16 14:34:24+00:00): I'll add the B Instead of the b, Yes its the same address, numbers 37, i was there yesterday
YomanNH (2023-03-19 22:50:30+00:00): Czemu tworzysz jakieś dziwne twory, jak ten "chodnik": https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1154503690, rzekomo przeznaczony dla pieszych i rowerzystów, a obok mapujesz drogę dla rowerów, dla której brakuje chociażby tagu surface? ciągi pieszo-rowerowe mapuje się w sposób opisany tutaj:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Rowery#Wsp.C3.B3lna_.C5.9Bcie.C5.BCka_rowerowa_i_chodnik.2C_z_osobn.C4.85_nawierzchni.C4.85
czyli tak, jak było to zrobione wcześniej. Jeśli możesz, przywróć poprzednie, prawidłowe mapowanie.
YomanNH (2023-03-20 20:40:09+00:00): Widzę, że ignorujesz komentarze i kontynuujesz wprowadzanie dziwnych zmian, więc przywróciłem prawidłowe mapowanie ciągów pieszo-rowerowych wzdłuż ul. Lipskiej.
Mashin (2023-03-15 20:47:36+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM!
The buildings that you drew/edited are not quite correct. You tried to trace the shape of the roof from the aerial imagery, but because the images were  taken under an angle the shape looks skewed. 
The buildings outline we typically draw are as if you are looking at the building directly down from above. That means both buildings should be a perfect rectangle.

Second point is that you moved Jojo's pizza restaurant to a parking lot. If the original location was really incorrect then the restaurant point should be positioned over a building where the restaurant is located.
cheers
JeroenHoek (2023-03-15 17:03:04+00:00): Je voegt hier dezelfde kliniek dubbel toe aan de kaart. Hij stond al op het terrein. Ik heb ze samengevoegd:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133718415
gabro00 (2023-03-16 16:15:18+00:00): Szia!
Látok még néhányat ő-vel (https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1suy), ezek szándékosan maradtak úgy?
itineris (2023-03-16 16:32:43+00:00): Természetesen nem szándékosan, csak az Osmose nem listázta őket. Most javítottam.
Köszönöm.

Ákos
Piotr Strębski (2023-03-15 14:05:38+00:00): Nie usuwaj NW, trzeba tylko go przenieść w poprawne miejsce. Według https://warszawa.wody.gov.pl/dane-kontaktowe/regionalny-zarzad to NW w Górze Kalwarii Mieści się w:
Nadzór Wodny w Górze Kalwarii
ul. Wyszyńskiego 28
05-530 Góra Kalwaria
 tel.: 22 727 35 14
 e-mail: nw-gorakalwaria@wody.gov.pl
Kalepom (2023-03-15 23:20:59+00:00): Bonjour Carboon, 
Sur cette borne de recharge https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10735493439/ a été ajouté le tag advertising=poster_box, qui ne semble pas cohérent avec l'objet décrit. Est-ce que c'est une erreur de saisie, ou est-ce que ça reflète une réalité ? Merci
Carboon33 (2023-03-16 10:47:33+00:00): Bonjour,
Oops oui je confirme l'erreur de saisie suite à un copier-coller de tags via Vespucci.
J'avoue être à mes débuts dessus. Je m'occupe de la suppression du tag signalé.
Merci pour le retour
wille (2023-03-15 17:56:42+00:00): Por favor, não utilize fotos extraídas do google street view para editar no OpenStreetMap. Isso não é aceito pelo projeto: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google . O mapillary.com tem fotos com permissão de uso no OSM.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133710504
volredman (2023-03-16 04:03:41+00:00): e conhecimento local pode ?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133710504
SK53 (2023-03-19 15:40:34+00:00): Can you also use accurate changeset comments. In this you changed a craft tag. Taginfo is not an appropriate source tag, although something like Osmose or Keep Right might be.

Given I have found several erroneous remote edits, I wanted to check other recent changesets of your which might also have impaired the accuracy of tagged objects.
willisturm (2023-03-24 09:33:47+00:00): You're right. The changeset comment is wrong here.

Willi
Frans S (2023-03-16 12:22:29+00:00): Hello again.
You mapped an empty piece of land as a building. Check for the shadow . If no shadow, it's most likely not a building.
Don't collect multiple buildings into 1 mapping. 
Don't connect nodes of a road to a building. 
Square each rectangular building.
Map more accurate by following the rooflines including corners.

Best regards
Frans S (2023-03-20 15:01:13+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
We welcome you as a new mapper.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
Mappings not accurate and squared.
Clustered buildings
Connected nodes to other buildings or features.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133710840
wille (2023-03-15 17:56:22+00:00): Por favor, não utilize fotos extraídas do google street view para editar no OpenStreetMap. Isso não é aceito pelo projeto: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google . O mapillary.com tem fotos com permissão de uso no OSM.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133710875
volredman (2023-03-16 04:04:53+00:00): e alterar com conhecimento local pode ?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133710875
wille (2023-03-16 12:54:03+00:00): Aqui tem algumas das regras: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:How_We_Map
O melhor é que os dados possam ser verificáveis, mas conhecimento local é sim bem-vindo. Para que a comunidade confie em suas edições, é preciso que você demonstre ter boas intenções e não copie dados de outros mapas.
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-03-15 17:13:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133717417 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for worldwide vandalism and fake edits not related to the given CS comments.
literan (2023-03-16 17:19:01+00:00): всем этим текстам не место в поле name - оно только для имен собственных.

в OSM все задается тегами
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-03-15 17:13:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133717417 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for worldwide vandalism and fake edits not related to the given CS comments.
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-03-15 17:13:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133717417 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for worldwide vandalism and fake edits not related to the given CS comments.
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-03-15 17:13:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133717417 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for worldwide vandalism and fake edits not related to the given CS comments.
BCNorwich (2023-03-16 08:27:37+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Please observe the many warnings listed above pertaining to your mapping. There are too many to describe individually but there are fictional names, (Desire Path, Steps), duplicated sections of highway, steps on top of paths, and more.

Another big problem is the number of changes/additions/edits that this changeset contains, (116 edits all told). This makes checking for problems extremely difficult and almost impossible for a new mapper.

Anyway, I've tried to look at all the problems and have made many amendments. I've removed the names, in OSM names must be the formal names verifiable by everyone passing, not descriptions. Most importantly I've corrected all the duplicated highway sections as these problems disrupt routing. 

Please limit your changeset upload to about 10 edits, that way you are warned of problems that can easily be traced and amended. And please read the help/beginners pages.

Regards Bernard.
user_5359 (2023-06-29 17:40:04+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1154517354. Please checkt the height value.
BCNorwich (2023-06-29 19:16:49+00:00): Hi user_5359,

I missed that one I've changed it to match the other fence just north mapped at the same time by the same person. Seems a good solution I think.

Regards Bernard
Manuel H (2023-08-14 18:03:50+00:00): Nicht Waldwege der Art "compacted" in "pebblestone" ändern. Letzteres ist Flusskies, der hier nicht verwendet wird.
Auch wenn das nicht auszuschliessen, ist der Weg 39638958 auf jeden Fall nicht mit Flusskies versehen worden.
Morneo (2023-08-14 19:55:45+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. Da ich nicht vor Ort bin, kann ich das nicht genauer überprüfen.
Manuel H (2023-08-14 20:04:24+00:00): Auf welcher Grundlage wurde das dann geändert, wenn nicht auf Vorortkenntnisse? Der Weg hatte bereits einen surface-Eintrag.
Morneo (2023-08-14 20:26:26+00:00): Ich war vor Ort, nämlich am 15. März und habe es daher angepasst. Nur kann ich zu deiner Anmerkung nun nichts sagen, da ich es aktuell nicht bin.
Manuel H (2023-08-14 20:28:44+00:00): Dann wurde es falsch angepasst, weil auch im März war da sicher kein pebblestone.
Morneo (2023-08-14 20:36:54+00:00): Wie gesagt: Keine Ahnung, wieso, weshalb und was ich da vor einem halben Jahr gemapt habe; glaube Dir aber gerne, dass da kein pebblestone ist.
Langlaeufer (2023-03-15 14:34:48+00:00): Hi Nick,
bzgl. surface=gravel. Darunter wird grober Schotter wie auf Bahndämmen verstanden. Das führt bei etlichen Routern zu sehr starker Abwertung der Wege. Meinst du ggf. verdichtet oder fine_gravel?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:surface
Grüße Langläufer.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133711725