piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Suchiman (2026-06-12 22:40:25+00:00): Hey there, thanks again for taking care of this. I've been looking to create and tag more parking lots and while looking up the syntax here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxstay#Examples , and please correct me if i'm wrong, but if i read that correctly, adding @ <condition> to the maxstay requires changing the tag to maxstay:conditional, plain maxstay must not carry a condition, am i understanding that correctly?
TG-map4 (2026-06-13 11:51:04+00:00): Hello,
to be fair, I am no expert and also just had a look at the Wiki. But you are totally right. "simple maxstay duration" => use maxstay. "complex parking duration with exceptions etc." => use maxstay:conditional. I corrected my wrong edits
NaufalFarras (2026-06-05 06:51:17+00:00): Classification upgrade of Jalan Kyai Ageng Gribig is based on the classification and de facto function of the road corridor. This road section in Malang City is classified as arterial secondary.

Road section in Malang Regency however is not arterial or main collector, but it connects Malang City center almost directly to the airport and Pakis. It also has two motorway links, making it more important. The length of this road section in Malang Regency is only about 2-3 km. Keeping it under highway=secondary would create short missing link between two primary roads.
NorthCrab_upload (2026-06-05 09:32:53+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1526326108

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
9_tab (2026-06-05 10:28:03+00:00): When you have a moment, could you kindly compile a summary of your 'daily' maintenance routine on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org ? I understand that these routes are generally considered to have limited utility and may introduce technical challenges due to the addition of numerous ways to relations.

In the summary, please include details on the following:

- Objective: What does this routine achieve, and what are its limitations?

- Route coverage: Which Flixbus routes are included, and which are excluded? Are all routes still active, and what happens to routes that are currently not in service?

- Significance of ways: Are the included ways meaningful, or are they merely potential routes between endpoints?

- Types of checks conducted: What specific checks do you perform as part of this routine?

- Support from Flixbus: How is this routine supported by Flixbus, if at all?

- Data verification: Is there a method to cross-verify this data with other sources, such as the Flixbus schedule?
addr: (2026-06-05 07:43:25+00:00): Big edit. Sorry
ChangwooRyu (2026-06-14 13:00:13+00:00): 이것도 폐업한 곳까지 추가했음. 영업중 여부를 데이터에서 반영 안 한 건지, 아니면 서류상으로는 영업중이라서 들어간 건지 모르겠지만, 이런 식으로 아무런 논의도 없이 대량의 데이터를 임포트하는 건 바람직한 행위가 아닙니다.
mavl (2026-06-11 03:02:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183950204 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20791].
Taya_S (2026-06-05 07:52:35+00:00): Reverted SEO Spam edits

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183680490
Taya_S (2026-06-05 07:52:36+00:00): Reverted SEO Spam edits

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183680490
Taya_S (2026-06-05 08:08:46+00:00): Botched SEO edit reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183681267
mavl (2026-06-11 03:02:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183950204 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20791].
mavl (2026-06-11 03:02:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183950204 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20791].
mavl (2026-06-11 03:02:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183950204 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20791].
mavl (2026-06-11 03:02:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183950204 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20791].
mavl (2026-06-11 03:02:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183950204 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20791].
Poretsew (2026-06-05 15:56:42+00:00): Hoi ligfietser,
Even over dit vlak: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1526339692. natural=shrub is geen geschikte tag hiervoor, dat is alleen voor losse struiken. Je zou natural=scrub kunnen gebruiken. Ik zie op de meest recente mozaïek-luchtfoto van Satellietdataportaal alleen gras maar je geeft survey aan, dus je hebt vast iets beter kunnen waarnemen wat er groeit.
Het andere vlak (multipolygon) langs de Hessenweg heb ik veranderd in landuse=orchard. Het blijkt een voedselbos te zijn met grotendeels fruitbomen. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183702718
Groet, 
Jelle
ligfietser (2026-06-06 13:16:11+00:00): Bedankt Jelle, wist niet wat precies het verschil was tussen scrub en shrub. Op de luchtfoto zie ik ook alleen nog gras, heb de aanpassing gedaan op basis van de melding.
Zal tzt eens kijken wat er gaat groeien als ik in de buurt ben.
Tatfahren (2026-06-05 19:03:48+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

Dazu sollte wohl das "building=yes" weg da du es über ein anderes Gebäude gezeichnet hast, und in einem anderen changeset grob über mehrere Gebäude.

Und was meinst du mit "location=roofpoint" ? Im wiki habe ich jedenfalls keine Dokumentation gefunden.
kubahahaha (2026-06-07 17:56:16+00:00): Ogarnij proszę jaka kategoria tu powinna być skoro znasz teren
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5330854
theDM (2026-06-09 05:41:40+00:00): Czy za węzłem Świnoujście w stronę Międzyzdrojów usunęli ograniczenia do 100 czy dalej tam są obniżone limity prędkości?
Zwiadowca21 (2026-06-09 05:46:00+00:00): Ograniczenie do 100 km/h jest do nieczynnego jeszcze węzła terminal LNG
theDM (2026-06-09 06:04:33+00:00): 4 miesiące temu ktoś usunął access=no i napisał, że węzeł jest już otwarty. Jak wygląda sprawa od strony Międzyzdrojów w kierunku Świnoujścia z ograniczeniem prędkości - zostały jakieś obniżone ograniczenia czy 100 km/h i niższe zaczynają się od węzła LNG do terminala?
AndyB_66 (2026-06-05 08:49:48+00:00): To nie jest dobry komentarz zestawu zmian: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
mavl (2026-06-11 03:02:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183950204 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20791].
Yog Sot (2026-06-05 23:03:57+00:00): you didnt give any source, i'm reverting this
Kookykooky (2026-06-06 07:52:34+00:00): Hi, the signature #mapycom means that the recorded change is not a random one, but is based on a report from our user who has actual experience with the place, but is unable to record this change on OSM himself. The user wrote to us that the path is completely impassable, so I removed it.
So, this error will still be there. OK
Yog Sot (2026-06-06 21:12:06+00:00): your user is wrong. You should quote that report along with a report date. So that i can survey yet again, which i did 2 weeks ago btw. 
Impassable is actually a visibility value, but it should only be used if it's so. 
The only prob with this path is that it's steep
Kookykooky (2026-06-08 08:02:10+00:00): Hi,
thanks for the clarification.
Have a nice day
mavl (2026-06-11 03:02:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183950204 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20791].
VictorIE (2026-06-11 21:36:24+00:00): Hi,

Was this changeset discussed with the community?

Changing sport=gaelic_football to sport=gaelic_games without adding gaelic_games:hurling=yes means that information is lost.
WWMapper101 (2026-06-11 21:47:45+00:00): Hi,

sport=gaelic_football is considered deprecated, and should be replaced by sport=gaelic_games. Specifying that this game is hurling is a subtag for a reason, which wasn’t clear at all with the former taggings
JochenOSM (2026-07-15 18:12:54+00:00): Hallo matze089,
Osmose (https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr) meldet für jeden von dir eingetragenen Stolperstein "The OSM object is linked to an unpermitted Wikidata item. The linked Wikidata item is instance of Q13406463, which is not permitted. Only items that directly relate to the feature should be linked, do not link to Wikidata internals, lists or discussion pages." 

Wenn ich den dort genannten Verweis auf https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikidata richtig verstehe, hättest du "link from monument to event that is memorialized should use subject:wikidata=* instead" benutzen sollen? Oder interpretiere ich das falsch?
matze089 (2026-07-15 18:56:26+00:00): Hallo Jochen. Danke für die Info. Für die meisten Personen gibt es keinen eigene Wikipedia Eintrag. Deshalb der Sammel-Eintrag. Das bedeutet für mich, daß unter Wikipedia keine Einträge machen kann. Muss ich dann löschen. Weiß nicht mehr, wann ich auf die Idee kam, den Wikipedia-Link einzutragen. Habe bestimmt mehrere hundert Stolpersteine eingetragen. Noch einen schönen Tag/Abend. Gruß, Matze
matze089 (2026-07-18 14:30:31+00:00): Hallo Jochen, 
habe mittlerweile alle Links gelöscht und nur links zu den Stolperstein Abbildungen auf Wikipedia verlinkt. Sollte so passen. 
LG, 
Matze
JochenOSM (2026-07-19 09:16:54+00:00): Prima, danke!
JochenOSM (2026-07-19 09:51:29+00:00): Hallo matze089,
leider zu früh gefreut. Ich finde es gut,  pro Stolperstein eine Referenz zu behalten. Aber so meldet Osmose  für jeden Stolperstein "wikimedia_commons-Merkmal sollte keine URL-Kodierungswerte wie '%27' enthalten". Kann es sein dass die URL nicht escaped sein sollte?
matze089 (2026-07-19 15:30:19+00:00): Hallo Jochen.
Habe keine Ahnung. Habe mich an andere Stolpersteine gehalten und gedacht, das wäre so richtig. Ich entferne jetzt auch diese links und trage nichts mehr ein. Soll dann jemand anderes machen.
LG und noch einen schönen Tag,
Matze089
matze089 (2026-07-19 15:42:43+00:00): Hallo Jochen, hoffentlich alle entfernt.
Gruß,
Matze089
vasony (2026-06-07 05:06:08+00:00): Szia!

Ha már opening hours-ben lekorlátoztad, hogy nincs nyitva, akkor miért kell construcion a sparra?

Átmeneti felújításra szerintem pont elég az opening hours, így az offline térképeket hónapokra kiüti.

T
bkil (2026-06-07 11:14:46+00:00): Passz. Nem igazán jöttek jó ötletek mátrixon, és gondoltam addig is jó volna elrejteni, hogy offline minél hamarabb el legyen rejtve. Szabad jobbá tenni.
Leo Slager (2026-06-06 23:42:00+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
arjunaraoc (2026-06-07 12:21:32+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183683776
kytta (2026-06-05 09:31:27+00:00): Hello, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Can you explain the edits that you did here and in https://osm.org/changeset/183684099 and the sources you used for them? ref=* on a runway should be its designated number, and I believe 15R/33L is still the correct value. Also, you removed the stopways and extended the runway, even though the Bing Maps imagery used in your changeset shows that the stopways are still present.

Could you please provide some clarification or sources for these changes? Please note that if we don't hear back or if these edits cannot be verified, the changesets will be reverted to keep the map accurate. Thank you!
5025022030 (2026-06-05 10:56:58+00:00): I will pursue legal action against you if you remove or modify it, and I have the legal, international, and judicial rights to do so. I am warning you!!
woodpeck (2026-06-05 14:10:33+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20767
5025022030 (2026-06-06 06:03:32+00:00): Damn you and your team, your website, and everyone associated with you! I will take legal action now and shut down this site by force of law. Just wait and see the full force of the law slap you in the face, I promise you that! And you, Frederik Ramm,

I will teach you a lesson you will see with your own eyes!
woodpeck (2026-06-06 19:24:50+00:00): This is the kind of intimidation that I asked you to stop. Who is Wissam Al-Dossari anyway and why do you think they would appreciate their name printed on a runway?
Frans S (2026-06-05 09:11:16+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please square the rectangular buildings with the Q key while still selected. 
Most of the buildings are not squared.
Please solve also the issues mentioned on the issue triangle before you upload your mappings.
Best regards and keep mapping
Kees 59 (2026-07-18 09:15:04+00:00): Probleempjes met de openingstijden.
Door het ontbreken van een scheidingsteken tussen Th-Fr en Sa. Maar daarnaast komen de openingstijden niet overeen met wat op de website staat.
Oscar Car Rental (2026-07-29 12:41:51+00:00): Opgelost — de openingstijden zijn gecorrigeerd (scheidingsteken + actuele tijden, zie changeset 186582124). Excuus voor de late reactie; changeset-reacties komen voortaan betrouwbaar bij ons binnen.
Harvesterify (2026-06-06 17:23:24+00:00): Hi, looks like there an error in the import, building is already mapped here and is not a static caravan : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/580184426/history
MrLocalFixer (2026-06-06 19:09:23+00:00): How to get anchor portal? i can't find it anywhere and adding it manually also did not worked. I want to add anchor portal in Anandpur Sahib substation.
NorthCrab_upload (2026-06-05 09:32:33+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/449813354

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
arjunaraoc (2026-06-07 12:22:29+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183684849
Gaung Tebono (2026-06-05 09:26:02+00:00): Detailed information is provided so that there is no confusion

Thanks 🙏🏻🙏🏻
NorthCrab_upload (2026-06-06 01:46:42+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4809123138
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/174533537

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
WoSoe (2026-06-06 03:39:01+00:00): Moin Wikiscout,

die Linie
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1217114714/history
ist ein äußerer Weg (outer) von nachfolgender  Grenze (boundary=protected_area).

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16008934

Die Linie ist nicht geschlossen – keine Fläche. Ich hatte das gestern schon einmal korrigiert (siehe history zur Linie).

Du hast jetzt wieder eine Fläche daraus gemacht, was einen Multipolygone Fehler zur Folge hat.

Ich hab das gerade wieder behoben.

https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=183721123#17/47.80386/13.03500

Bitte nicht wieder eine Fläche erzeugen.

Danke und Gruß
WoSoe
Wikiscout (2026-06-06 07:54:36+00:00): Sorry, mir wurde von OSM angezeigt, dass das eine Fläche sein sollte
user_5359 (2026-07-16 09:00:53+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10775405. What is the mean of the tag  PDS = Ituri?
nevw (2026-06-24 05:45:50+00:00): Hi, you will need to redo this area as the multipolygon is not valid.
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=115.94449&lat=-31.92804&zoom=19
danielbarton (2026-06-24 08:46:28+00:00): Thanks for picking that up, should be OK and not reporting now
NorthCrab_upload (2026-06-06 01:47:05+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/449813354

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-06-06 01:36:06+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8403232659
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1017408830

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-06-06 01:46:31+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8403232659
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1017408830

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-06-06 01:46:57+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13911791277

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Tomas Straupis (2026-06-05 10:22:59+00:00): Hello. If you choose to follow maproulette and fix some errors, please do a proper fix, not just formally remove geometry errors. In this case building geometry is clearly different than what you've left. Such changes do not help, as they hide problems instead of fixing them. Thank you :-) I will revert this change and do a proper fix.
MadCat3D (2026-06-05 20:33:13+00:00): I Reverted because this section of I-15 is recently opened and does note reflect on satellite map but is in fact the current physical routing of I-15. source - https://udotinput.utah.gov/1800north#tab-36202

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183714418
Cliffmap (2026-06-29 17:54:46+00:00): Hi MadCat3D, thank you for reverting the changeset, and for the explanation regarding the layout. I will be more aware in my future edits.
Tomas Straupis (2026-06-05 10:40:18+00:00): I would like to comment this case as well. That is the actual geometry of the building, with such angle. You do not have to create artificial geometries just to make validator happy. I will revert this one as well.
Tomas Straupis (2026-06-05 10:42:12+00:00): In this change instead of one object - one social facility you've created FIVE of them :) That is incorrect. I will revert this as well.
Tomas Straupis (2026-06-05 10:46:49+00:00): In this case you've removed actual geometry detail. Sorry, but I will have to revert this as well.
Taya_S (2026-06-05 10:05:19+00:00): Hi, was this automated edit discussed and agreed upon anywhere?
AgenticCommonsBot (2026-06-05 10:29:30+00:00): Yes — I posted a disclosure to the talk-ja mailing list before starting, and documented the bot's scope and gating rules on the OSM wiki:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits/AgenticCommonsBot/zh-name

On the tagging mailing list, Frederik Ramm followed up asking how we ensure Wikidata holds actual Chinese names rather than transliterations/translations. My reply: the source is zh.wikipedia sitelinks (names that Chinese-speaking editors themselves use to refer to the entity), not machine translation, and the bot requires double-source agreement between the Wikidata zh label and the zhwiki article title before writing — if they disagree, the candidate is skipped.

The pilot is intentionally starting at very low pace (~5 edits/day, Japan only, strictly additive, one object per changeset) so the community can see the edits before any volume.
JJIglesias (2026-06-05 20:58:10+00:00): Ya hicimos las correcciones pertinentes, según sus Notas y en varias de las zonas adyacentes a su propiedad y en la población de Cabezas también.

Deben aparecerle en la siguiente actualización del Mapa en las aplicaciones OrganicMaps, Comaps y Osmand, en los próximos días.

Gracias por su aporte
Baloo Uriza (2026-06-09 13:03:16+00:00): This seems unlikely in the middle of a farmer's field.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183687119
Fizzie-DWG (2026-07-11 07:53:24+00:00): DWG revert - apparent fictitious mapping

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185523153
Baloo Uriza (2026-06-09 13:03:39+00:00): Aren't ShotSpotters always in cities?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183687156
mapwizz1492 (2026-07-09 16:01:22+00:00): I think there is a possibility every addition by this user, 16 or so in this local area, are not legitimate surveillance equipment.
Fizzie-DWG (2026-07-11 07:53:25+00:00): DWG revert - apparent fictitious mapping

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185523153
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-06 19:15:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183752762 where the changeset comment is: reverted because of threats to the project, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20772
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-06 19:15:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183752762 where the changeset comment is: reverted because of threats to the project, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20772
Fizzie-DWG (2026-07-11 07:53:26+00:00): DWG revert - apparent fictitious mapping

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185523153
mapwizz1492 (2026-07-09 17:05:28+00:00): This is rural area private property with a LPR?  There are 16 to 18 edits that appear to be non legitimate in this 1 square mile area.
Fizzie-DWG (2026-07-11 07:53:27+00:00): DWG revert - apparent fictitious mapping

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185523153