piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Stefan Kinell (2024-06-11 08:15:02+00:00): Oups, tack. Då lärde jag mig två saker - 1. att tertiary måste vara en genomfartsled, jag tyckte mig läst på men hade uppenbart fel. 2. att "unclassified" inte betyder att man inte vet vilken klassificering en väg har, utan att det i sig är en klassificering.

Då kan även jag korrigera vägar jag ser som är "unclassified" när de kan vara helt andra saker, som traktorvägar etc. 

Tack för korrigeringen.
archie (2024-06-11 08:19:10+00:00): Vänligen "klassifiera" inte om vägar till tertiary helt så där  utan att ange motivering för det. Denna väg har överhuvud taget inte karaktär av en tertiary-väg.
Jag klassifierade om en väg för en tid sedan (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150975364). Detta skedde med motivering i cs och efter konsultation med Sveriges mest kompetente väg-karterare (riiga).
literan (2024-06-12 12:39:50+00:00): кривой формат адрески 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%90%D0%B4%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%B0#%D0%9D%D1%83%D0%BC%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%B2
literan (2024-06-12 17:17:02+00:00): кривой формат адрески

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%90%D0%B4%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%B0#%D0%9D%D1%83%D0%BC%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%B2
rskedgell (2024-07-24 17:00:58+00:00): Reverted and updated. It is correct now.
NicaTopo (2024-06-11 14:17:08+00:00): Joanna,

Your building shapes are far bigger than the imagery. I'm going to delete the biggest ones. Please narrow to shape to match exactly the satellite imagery. 

Thank you.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-05 08:11:54+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/338400683/history has shop = fruit that was added in this edit
shop=fruit ? Maybe shop=greengrocer was intended? If they truly sell solely only fruit then maybe extra tag like greengrocer=fruit would be better? If they sell also vegetables then https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=greengrocer is definitely better.

shop=greengrocer is far more widely used and supported and does fit even if only variety of fruits is sold.

But maybe another shop tag would fit better? Maybe shop=farm? ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=farm )
literan (2024-06-12 17:15:18+00:00): неверно записано название улицы
ZO4EYFP6HN (2024-06-11 10:15:14+00:00): Kashmir Children Academy Building
velomeloman (2024-06-11 12:31:54+00:00): Пруд уехал
ad47 (2024-06-17 20:26:57+00:00): Ой.
Но уже вернули на место.
Yog Sot (2024-08-08 20:28:12+00:00): nie jest zakazane, bo znaki określają iż jeździć tam można. 
Problem wynika z tego iż MIR w Poznaniu nie ogarnia iż drogi jednokierunkowe znakuje się dla rowerów tak samo jak dla samochodów, tylko zamiast tego myśli, że jak z jednej strony stoi znak rowerowy, a z drugiej strony nie, to niby droga jest jednokierunkowa dla rowerów. Więc generalnie pewno zrobi ci reverta, no chyba, że masz jakis inny pomysł ;d
db-ak (2024-08-11 17:10:19+00:00): Po obu stronach wiaduktu, w jednym kierunku jest zakazne poprze znak C-16, więc ten znak nie świadczy o jednokierukowym ruchu rowrów po chodniku. Mamy dylemat czy tworzyć mamy według MIR, PoRD czy własnych ocen lub na podstawie innych przypadków na OSM. W mieście pełno jest DPR które mają zank tylko od jednej strony, ale też są miejsca gdzie prawidłowo stawiany jest znak zakazu. Dla mnie jasne jest że                 rerem po chodniku nie jedzie się gdzie jest znak C-16. I prawdziwe jest że w jednym kierunku rowerem porusza się po zatoce. Kwestia własnej inteptacji jest jak zdefiniować sam chodnik na platformie chodnikowej i z chęcią zainteresuje się tym
Yog Sot (2024-08-11 20:58:34+00:00): od strony skrzyżowania stoi c16, a od drugiej stoi c-13. To znaczy, że droga jest rowerowa, czy jest piesza? A może pieszo/rowerowa. 
Arbitralnie zadecydowałeś, ze na fragmencie jest pieszo/rowerowa, a na fragmencie tylko piesza. Nie możesz tak robić, zwłaszcza w związku z tym, że to MIR zarządza ruchem dróg w Poznaniu, a ten ma inne zdanie niż ty. 
Kwestie prawne sa zagmatwane, tak jak np w innej zmianie pozwoliłeś na ruch rowerem na arterii samochodowe, ale nie wiesz, ze zakaz, który jest 10 km wcześniej obowiązuje do konca drogi, chociaz osoba wjeźdżająca na drogę za znakiem nie widząc go bez problemu by się wybroniła. 

Po prostu nie zmieniaj czegoś co ktoś inny zmapował bez poddanie tego pod dyskusję w szerszym gronie.
db-ak (2024-08-12 14:01:25+00:00): MIR nie zarządza ruchem. Co to za określenie? Odpowiada za wprowadzenie SOR, które można zaskrarżyć do nadrzędnych instytucji. Wychodzisz z poglądem że MIR jest ważniejszy od PoRD. Co do zmiany ruchu rowerowego na Krzywoustego, to znaki zakazu obowiązują do najbliższego skrzyżowania, a ich jest pełno.
Yog Sot (2024-08-12 19:44:57+00:00): tylko niektóre znaki obowiązują do najbliższego skrzyżowania, znaki z zasady obowiązują od miejsca ustawienia przy drodze do jej końca. Tak prawi prawo, ale zdałeś prawko bez jego czytania jak większość kierowców. To nie jest przytyk, tylko tak po prostu jest w Polsce. 
Przykładowo chodnik na rondzie jest częścią skrzyżowania, a więc w miejscu gdzie się zaczyna przestaje byc droga dla rowerów? Bo droga dla rowerów akurat obowiązuje właśnie do skrzyżowania. Będziesz kasować wszystkie takie drogi dla rowerów i mapował zakaz, bo takie jest prawo?

Jeszcze raz, po prostu jak chcesz  robić takie mikro zmiany, weź to najpierw przedyskutuj. W sprawie Szymanowskiego po prostu nie masz racji.
db-ak (2024-08-14 09:27:20+00:00): Stworzyłem dyskusję/uwagę w analogicznym miejscu koło skrzyżowania Dąbrowskeigo/Żeromskiego. Zapraszam do wymiany opinii
Yog Sot (2024-08-15 23:16:14+00:00): zapodaj link
InsertUser (2024-06-13 12:58:30+00:00): What is your source for this?
What is the age of your source for this?

A large proportion of the amenities in this area were washed away in Hurricane Dorian, how do you as a remote mapper know that this still exists?

Why are you misusing the main website tag for a random booking website?
Fedor Filimonov (2024-06-13 13:13:36+00:00): Corrected. Unfortunately, at the time of editing, they did not additionally check the functionality of the hotel. I'll be more careful.
eggie (2024-06-12 15:16:30+00:00): warnings:mismatched_geometry:unclosed_multipolygon_part

Hier is iets mis gegaan. De landuse rendert niet meer, want de polygoon is niet meer gesloten en is zelfs een multipolygoon geworden. . Ik pas even wat aan. 

Voor een ijsbaan is overigens een speciale tag.
eggie
eggie (2024-06-12 15:22:43+00:00): landuse deel hersteld.. De ijsbaan is ook gras op gras.
eggie (2024-06-12 15:25:26+00:00): De landuse van die opgeplakte ijsbaan ook hersteld. Het gras waar de naam van de ijsbaan op staat is nu de inner. In de multipolygoon.
Die kun je dan evt omtaggen tot ijsbaan. 
Wat leesvoer
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Multipolygon_Examples
eggie (2024-06-12 15:26:44+00:00): Voorbeeld ijsbaan
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/51.87042/4.67576
eggie (2024-06-12 15:27:41+00:00): Even ctrl f5   dan komt de landuse weer terug
Emiel3673 (2024-06-13 07:38:42+00:00): Het viel me inderdaad al op dat er iets niet klopte, maar ik ging er van uit dat dat enkel in de editor was. Bedankt voor de correctie.
Voor de ijsbaan heb ik gekeken naar een buurtdorp, maar dat was dus geen goed voorbeeld. Ik zal het aanpassen. Als ik het goed begrijp zat de multipolygoon dus binnenstebuiten.
eggie (2024-06-13 08:13:02+00:00): Dag Emiel,
De inner mp was wel goed, maar er lag nog een (oud)  vlak landuse grass onder.
Jouw vlak heb ik verwijderd en de innerrelatie op de reeds aanwezige vlak landuse=grass gelegd.
Van dat vlak zou je de ijsbaan kunnen maken.
Het is een beetje arbitrair, want er zal zelden ijs liggen. Maar het blijft natuurlijk wel de ijsbaan. 
Die andere vlakken bos en gras en noorden van de ijsbaan gaan nu weer renderen. De polygonen waren niet gesloten.
eggie (2024-06-13 08:14:42+00:00): Het is nu oke zie ik.
eggie (2024-06-13 08:23:28+00:00): De rendering zet nog niet door. Er zal wel een 'issue' zijn met die tegels ivm grootschalige vernieling van de kaart. Hier op dit niveau is het nog te zien.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/52.8937/6.0926&layers=N
eggie (2024-06-13 08:50:01+00:00): Zie https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/iemand-enig-idee-waarom-een-heel-engels-wegennet-over-een-deel-van-nederland-lag/111591/14
fortera_au (2024-06-11 23:39:10+00:00): This isn't the location of Rydges Pit Lane, and it's already mapped in the correct location. I've removed this as a result.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152532258
Fedor Filimonov (2024-06-12 07:01:12+00:00): Thank You!
TrickyFoxy (2024-06-13 19:09:47+00:00): Ну не пещерой же:)
Bobbi123 (2024-06-11 10:31:45+00:00): Es ist sehr unschön, dass du bei deinen Änderungen nicht mal einen kurzen Kommentar schreibst, was du geändert hast. So kann sich in der Liste niemand vorstellen, was du geändert hast. Bitte sei so nett und trage künftig wenigstens ein paar Worte dazu ein, was du geändert hast, danke.
eggie (2024-06-11 10:54:26+00:00): Dag TK  In dit geval kun je gewoon highway service gebruiken.
Die loopt alleen maar naar het parkeerterreintje.
Dit stukje heeft ook geen officiële straatnaam in de BGT. 
oneway=no hoeft niet op reguliere wegen. Dat doe je alleen als je bang bent dat iemand oneway=yes gaat taggen Bv op een tweerichting fietsrotonde.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-06-11 10:57:30+00:00): https://www.verbeterdekaart.nl/#?geometry.x=236028.57&geometry.y=591295.82&zoomlevel=14.25
aceman444 (2025-10-23 17:44:15+00:00): Davajte pozor, SPU je uz davno zakreslena ako https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/357005956 .
literan (2024-06-12 17:13:13+00:00): кривой формат адрески

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%90%D0%B4%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%B0#%D0%9D%D1%83%D0%BC%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%B2
DaveF (2025-01-16 02:45:27+00:00): Why have you removed the highway tag?
Why have you added 'was:highway'?
Jorisbo (2025-01-16 09:10:17+00:00): Hi Dave, thank you for you question, What is the source of your public footpath? Is it ground trouth? Does it really crosses building roofs and golf greens? On july 2025 microsoft streetview images show no such connection or path. It would not be nice if all kinds of routing apps suggest you shortcuts through highways that don't exists. Kind regards Joris
Jorisbo (2025-01-16 09:25:07+00:00): Sorry images of 2020, not very sharp, Regards, Joris
Zkir (2024-12-18 23:13:19+00:00): Привет, подскажи пж, это правда многоквартирный дом? Откуда это известно?
gscholz (2024-06-23 07:41:02+00:00): Hi HPBC,
this changeset has created several errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=6.48659&lat=46.23111&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=152534700

As you may know, this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps.
Can you please fix this?

Yo may also like to educate yourself about how to edit hiking routes properly:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route%3Dhiking

Kind regards
Guido
marc__marc (2024-08-05 22:37:45+00:00): Hello,
it's covered because the parking is multi-level ? if yes, parking need to be fixed in osm
Regards,
Marc
Rom1 (2024-06-11 12:33:11+00:00): Thanks, merci Nick pour ta contribution à Toul :)
NeisBot (2024-06-11 10:21:24+00:00): Hi Kamrul Islam  003, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1291258925

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-15 13:37:59+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152722042
eggie (2024-06-11 10:47:07+00:00): Welcome to OSM,

reverted due to damage the  coastline..
Please don't edit the coastline as a starting mapper .. You damaged the multipolygones.
The bassins have different names in the Port of Scheveningen.

The harbour is already mapped correctly. 

Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2024-06-11 10:47:49+00:00): reverted by changeset #152537022
eggie (2024-06-11 11:31:59+00:00): https://map.openseamap.org/?zoom=15.5&lon=4.26193&lat=52.09889&layers=TFTFFFTFFTFFFFFFFFFFFF
Mapping harbours is done by skilled OpenSeaMappers
PanaderoFloor (2024-06-11 12:29:05+00:00): So where is the natural = water then?
PanaderoFloor (2024-06-11 12:31:18+00:00): Could you tell me in detail what I did wrong. I made a polygon of the entire Scheveningen Harbour, as this is (still) missing in the OSM data.
PanaderoFloor (2024-06-11 12:32:39+00:00): I added it to the coastline, as the coastline ways follow the harbour basin, but the polygon of the North Sea does not.
eggie (2024-06-11 12:47:36+00:00): Editor iD is not the right editor for this job.
This editor can't handle multipolygones. 
Your intention was okay ofcourse. 
You need a lot of skills to do that.
Now the problem here was that two outers of the same multipolygon are connected with eachother.
Thats will give problems. 
So please leave the mapping of harbours and coastline to the openseamappers or contact one of these mappers.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenSeaMap
You may also put a remark on the map with the question that a skilled openseamapper will have a look to the harbour. 

Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2024-06-11 12:50:35+00:00): 2nd On the map we don't have a port IJmuiden, Amsterdam, Rotterdam.
So no need to tag the name Scheveningen haven on top of the present bassins. 
You may also contact the Dutch forum
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/nl/43
PanaderoFloor (2024-06-11 13:15:43+00:00): Thanks!
ZO4EYFP6HN (2024-06-11 10:30:26+00:00): ERSA Street, House No. 2
SomeoneElse (2024-08-30 08:47:24+00:00): Hello,
It looks like this edit has made https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/98531456/history all one very long bridge.
I'm guessing that that is not correct?
Best Regards,
Andy
literan (2024-06-12 12:38:27+00:00): кривой формат адрески 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%90%D0%B4%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%B0#%D0%9D%D1%83%D0%BC%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%B2
Tatiana24 (2024-06-13 07:38:27+00:00): добрый день! спасибо за информацию, в инструкции озон этого не было, нам обещали поправить.
literan (2024-06-12 17:11:45+00:00): кривой тег. Хоть бы посмотрели ,как на соседних зданиях сделано
OSMchik (2024-06-13 05:15:25+00:00): А в чем конкретно была ошибка?
literan (2024-06-13 08:07:25+00:00): вы уже посмотрели, как сделано на соседних зданиях, сравнили с тем что внесли вы?
OSMchik (2024-06-13 08:48:57+00:00): Населенный пункт был неверно указан?
literan (2024-06-13 08:58:54+00:00): 1. Это не населенный пункт, это коттеджный поселок. 

2. При адресации не по улице, а по нас. пункту или коттеджному поселку/СНТ применяется тег addr:place. Тег addr:city вообще, как правило, в России использовать не нужно

3. На соседних домах стоит тег addr:place=Зеленая Усадьба

вы же указали: addr:city=ДНП Зелёная Усадьба (т.е. название не так как на остальных домах). Плюс указали улицу.

Как здесь звучит полный адрес, для данного дома?
OSMchik (2024-06-13 09:25:27+00:00): Адрес: Полевая улица, 2, ДНП Зелёная Усадьба

Ошибка моя, в принципе, понятна, не тот тег указал. 
Нужно, как вы и написали, addr:place=Зеленая Усадьба. 

Просто здесь два поселка тесно соседствуют друг с другом, но почему-то на соседних домах (вдоль Северной и Лесной улиц) указано, что данный поселок относится к Лигачево, хотя они друг от друга не зависят.
literan (2024-06-13 14:43:00+00:00): если адресация по улицам, то в принципе тег addr:place=Зеленая Усадьба лишний (он берется из контура)

если адресация по названию КП, то тег addr:place=Зеленая Усадьба нужен
whb (2026-04-27 13:15:51+00:00): Guten Tag,

vermutlich Verwechslung mit Abschnitten der Hauptstraße und Bahnhofstraße weiter südlich. Deshalb Änderungen teilweise rückgängig gemacht:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181890481

Viele Grüße
whb
Polarbear (2024-08-11 07:11:41+00:00): Dear Anrijs Terauds,
the English description "Olympic Cauldron" is certainly not a name in the OSM meaning.

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name?uselang=en - where not to use:
"The feature is known by a generic term or description"

I have moved the tag to description:en.

I also urge you to use descriptive changeset comments. "Updates_2024" is completely meaningless for the mapping community. Please give concrete reasons and sources for your edits.
SomeoneElse (2024-06-14 10:07:02+00:00): After theis change there are now two new big gaps - is that correct?  See http://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeMap?relationId=12812573 .
Tomasz Znamirowski (2024-06-14 10:34:02+00:00): Corrected. The Affric Kintail Way goes now through the Glenurquhart Forest not along River Enrick. Thanks for the comment.
SomeoneElse (2024-06-14 10:40:31+00:00): Thanks!
literan (2024-06-12 17:10:44+00:00): кривой формат адреса
Tatiana24 (2024-06-13 20:11:51+00:00): этот пакет правок от 11.06., а с озон профит мы разрешили этот вопрос только сегодня. Я извиняюсь, но сама постоянно переписываюсь с поддержкой, чтобы не было вот таких ошибок, дело в том, что сегодня ситуация была, я выполняю задание по вашей инструкции, а они мне отклоняют, потому что у них инструкция кривая, ничего не исправлено. Надеюсь, что сегодняшние правки все без ошибок.
NeisBot (2024-06-11 10:48:24+00:00): Hi Endriy__1, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/node/11971788597

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-11 10:59:11+00:00): Thanks for your mapped beach.
Looks good!

#HappyMapping
literan (2024-06-12 12:05:07+00:00): криво вносите адреску. Необходимы пробелы перед буквами
RRIbarruri (2024-06-26 09:41:09+00:00): В доке, которую я видел, было именно так
literan (2024-06-26 11:15:42+00:00): в какой еще доке? может, с яндексом спутали?:))

все четко сказано: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%90%D0%B4%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%B0#%D0%9D%D1%83%D0%BC%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%B2
Merlin13245 (2024-06-11 19:21:42+00:00): Oh interesting... is your track and field circuit really part of the roadway? Like, people would drive on it to exit the parking lot?
Teresa Williamson (2024-06-11 19:30:29+00:00): No the back side of the track is not, but I just started using the software and didn't know how to change it.
Merlin13245 (2024-06-11 20:58:32+00:00): All good! The editor has a learning curve to it. It doesn't look like you've fully completed the walk through - I would highly recommend doing so as it will really cut down the difficulty in using the online editor.

I've made some further adjustments based off your additions and comments. You can see my changes here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152561507#map=19/33.49602/-84.57039

It may take several days for the map to update visually, but you can view my changes instantly by pressing "edit" after following that link.

Thanks for contributing to the map! Happy mapping :)
Teresa Williamson (2024-06-12 10:07:56+00:00): Oh thank you!  I appreciate your help and will go back and finish the walk through.
aequator (2024-06-27 16:44:27+00:00): Hallo Ralf, 
willkommen bei OSM und Danke für Deinen Beitrag. Auf welche amtlichen Stadtpläne beziehst Du Dich? Im Stadtplan der Firma Städteverlag steht Auer Brücke. Im Plan des Vermessungs- und Liegenschaftsamts der Stadt Pforzheim steht Auer-Brücke. An der Brücke selber steht Auerbrücke. Nach der On-the-ground-Regel [1] wäre 
name=Auerbrücke +
official_name=Auer-Brücke
das richtige Tagging für das Brückenbauwerk. Da die Straße, die über die Brücke führt, Kreuzstraße heißt, ist name=Kreuzstraße für den way der Straße richtig. Die Brücke habe ich zwischenzeitlich als separates Bauwerk eingezeichnet. 
Grüße
Carsten
[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Map_what's_on_the_ground
Đuro Jiří (2024-07-24 18:12:56+00:00): Ciao Pere Antoni,
te voglio solo informare, che spiaggia a Bibione non ha nome. Bibione Spiaggia è società, che gestisce una parte della spiaggia, però spiaggia non ha questo nome.
Corretto
Pere Antoni (2024-09-24 09:29:33+00:00): Hi Duro. I understand, thanks for your feedback. But, since you have local knowledge about the area, do you know if this beach has a name? It should have, right? Thanks :)
Đuro Jiří (2024-09-24 09:34:52+00:00): No, spiaggia a Bibione non ha nome. Non tutte le spiagge devono avere nome.
Saluti
Pere Antoni (2024-09-24 11:15:37+00:00): Obviously, I'm not a local, but it's quite clear that the commonly used name is 'spiaggia di Bibione'. The official page of the 'comune' refers to this beach by this name. You can check https://www.comunesanmichele.it/flex/cm/pages/ServeBLOB.php/L/IT/IDPagina/88
It's not something I made up myself from nothing; it has a real use. People search the beach by this name, so don't you think it should be renamed accordingly?
Đuro Jiří (2024-09-24 11:34:41+00:00): No,non è così perché per esempio a Caorle (VE)  spiaggia non si chiama Spiaggia di Caorle,però Spiaggia di Levante e Spiaggia di Ponente. Altro esempio Grado (GO) , spiaggia non si chiama Spiaggia di Grado, però Costa Azzurra, Spiaggia Pineta,Le dune di Grado e Spiaggia Principale.
Spiaggia di Bibione è uguale se chiami tutte le spiagge italiane "spiagge d'Italia.
Pere Antoni (2024-09-24 14:26:06+00:00): I understand your point, but if for example, I search 'Spiaggia di Caorle', the results will show me indeed the names you wrote (Spiaggia di Levante and Spiaggia di Ponente), and is obvious that 'Spiaggia di Caorle' is not the official name.
But that's not the case with Bibione, and there are official pages naming the beach as that as I showed you. I don't understand why it can't have a name if people know that beach by that name. Is there no possibility of reconsidering this?
I have a deep respect and admiration for the OSM project and the people like you who invest time in keeping this tool as updated as possible and always supported by local knowledge and verified sources. This is why I want you to understand I don't want to force an update which can be a mistake because is just based on personal interests, I do believe this could be a valuable addition based on reliable sources of information.
Đuro Jiří (2024-09-24 14:43:41+00:00): Si, però nel sito è scritto spiaggia con la lettera "s" minuscola e non maiuscola.
Đuro Jiří (2024-10-18 07:45:40+00:00): Appena adesso sto cancellando nome della spiaggia, perché spiaggia non ha nome. Quando è scritto spiaggia con "s" minuscolo, significa che non è nome.
Saluti
dreua (2025-08-17 22:30:02+00:00): Find ich erst mal gut, die Rheinallee 88 hier an die Industriefläche zu taggen. osm.org findet damit aber leider nichts unter der Suche nach "rheinallee 88 mainz" das ist nicht so optimal. Ich hab jetzt noch nicht tiefer gesucht, hast du vielleicht eine Idee wie man das lösen könnte?

OsmAnd findet das Gebiet, zeigt es zwar als "Wiesbaden" an, aber das ist ein anderes Problem.
SHB2000 (2024-07-10 10:06:51+00:00): Hi, are you sure that the track speeds are 80 km/h? Often lines will have a higher track speed, even if they're operationally limited to 80 km/h.
❤️‍🔥 (2024-07-10 10:22:56+00:00): hey, I asked at the community open day which confirmed the calculation of 80km/h (see above). But if you have a better source, please go ahead and change it