piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2026-02-01 06:57:13+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 16 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1394083768 v5 | 7 crossings
https://osm.org/way/686769064 v11 | 3 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1442402294 v2 | 3 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177937272
天雨实乃理_AmauMinori (2026-02-02 12:51:31+00:00): Thank you for your review. I sincerely apologize for failing to notice the connectivity issues when making changes to the map. I have now revised the obviously problematic junctions, but there are still some unaddressed sections that require further updates by other contributors due to the lack of on-site surveys and other uncertainties. I apologize again for this inconvenience.
rempshaener (2026-02-01 11:11:12+00:00): Hallo,
das hier ist ein produktives System, daher der Hinweis auf https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Sandbox_for_editing
Viele Grüße
Hydrant Hunter (2026-02-01 12:07:30+00:00): Vielen Dank für den Hinweis. Ich schaue mir das gern an.

Mit diesem Nutzer teste ich aktuell die Hydranten-Jäger-App von User: Wankmann:
https://frnkmrz.github.io/hydranten-app/
Details und Code finden sich hier:
https://github.com/FrnkMrz/hydranten-app

Alle Änderungen durch User: Hydrant Hunter wurden bereits wieder von Wankmann entfernt.

Ergänzend dazu, falls relevant:
https://frnkmrz.github.io/OpenFireMapV2/
https://github.com/FrnkMrz/OpenFireMapV2

Weiterer Kontakt, Feedback oder Anregungen bitte direkt über User: Wankmann.
蕉饼电脑 (2026-01-31 19:08:30+00:00): 请你停止添加不符合当地文字之名称的"name"值，并停止非小型村落之地点添加place=hamlet 标签。
taihoku (2026-01-31 19:13:29+00:00): 中華民國領土使用正體字。
蕉饼电脑 (2026-01-31 19:27:06+00:00): OpenStreetMap根据实际控制情况为准，而以不是法理领土范围情况为准。不论你持何种政治观点，你所编辑的范围事实上的由“中华人民共和国”完全控制，地点名称事实上的依据《中华人民共和国国家通用语言文字法》规定之“规范汉字”编纂。若你否认这一事实，建议你先将中国大陆划入 r/449220 边界关系内再进行相关编辑。
taihoku (2026-01-31 19:37:30+00:00): 依照《中華人民共和國測繪法》，未取得測繪資格、未經官方許可的私人測繪製圖活動屬於違法行為。
我會建議你刪帳號，或是移除個人訊息。
蕉饼电脑 (2026-01-31 19:43:43+00:00): 那你向国安部门检举我非法测绘，我向DWG检举你故意发布不符合实际情况的编辑，如何？
taihoku (2026-01-31 19:49:44+00:00): 我沒動機檢舉你，你有需求我可以代勞。
你要檢舉請便。
woodpeck (2026-02-26 10:03:49+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19842
Frank Peng (2026-01-31 22:04:14+00:00): Thanks for the fix!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177937880
Jordi MF (2026-02-01 20:15:11+00:00): Hola averduc,

He editat l'aparcament perquè com es tracta d'un sol aparcament, només s'ha d'afegir un node. Tanmateix, sí que se poden etiquetar les dos entrades amb una altra etiqueta (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking_entrance). Mira-t'ho. La veritat és que la manera d'afegir estos aparcaments no és satisfactori en OSM... L'ideal seria mapejar l'àrea exacta de l'aparcament, però al ser subterrani és impossible. A més, no hi ha una manera senzilla de dir-li a OSM que les dos entrades a l'aparcament subterrani de La Rosaleda són les dos que jo he afegit...
averduc (2026-02-02 15:58:26+00:00): Moltes gràcies per la resposta
Der Troisdorfer (2026-02-02 09:14:23+00:00): Testbenachrichtigung
Znaika (2026-04-25 17:57:26+00:00): Hi, für den Fußweg ist bicycle=no solange VZ 1022-10 nicht vorhanden ist. Radfahrer sollen den Weg parallel nutzen. VG.
rempshaener (2026-04-25 18:06:51+00:00): Danke, schon gesehen. VG
A67-A67 (2026-02-06 15:31:34+00:00): Ik heb de tagging van busbaan (highway=busway) en inzinkbare paal (bollard=rising) verbeterd.
Crashtender (2026-02-06 15:57:00+00:00): Zat hier even in twijfel. Situatie ter plaatse is goed te zien in Google Maps. 
Zet je dit op bus sluis (vanwege de verhouding ter plaatse) of kies je toch voor een rising bollard? Het is eigenlijk geen paal, maar wel een beweegbaar obstakel
A67-A67 (2026-02-01 12:05:23+00:00): Thanks for the details. 
There were some errors in this edit:
- In the Netherlands POIs are mapped at the address node, not at the buildings. The petrol stations and the roof are separate entities.
- 'Verzorgingsplaats' is a description. It isn't part of the name, so it shouldn't be in the name-tag.

I've solved these errors.
JeroenvanderGun (2026-02-24 15:31:28+00:00): I've re-added ref=A67 to the carriageways within the service areas; motorway service areas in the Netherlands are considered part of the numbered road.
stasiu512 (2026-02-02 12:42:46+00:00): Cześć takie zmiany powinny być wcześniej dyskutowane i omawiane na forum. Zmiana wycofana https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178005123. Pozdrawiam.
woodpeck_repair (2026-02-12 23:21:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 178479265 where the changeset comment is: revert changes that pretend to be made with vespucci but aren't
Frank Peng (2026-01-31 20:41:47+00:00): You just modified the geometry of an existing industrial area instead of adding any landuse in this changeset.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177940270
woodpeck_repair (2026-02-12 23:21:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 178479265 where the changeset comment is: revert changes that pretend to be made with vespucci but aren't
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-01-31 20:37:37+00:00): reverts https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171094648
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-01-31 20:36:54+00:00): reverts https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171094471
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-01-31 20:27:00+00:00): reverts https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171094634
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-01-31 20:25:33+00:00): reverts https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171094332
NeisBot (2026-02-01 06:58:11+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13515572908 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "office building"

#MapWithoutSpam
Virtual Hub Agency (2026-02-01 17:40:36+00:00): Yeah sure,
I will revise it accordingly
woodpeck_repair (2026-02-12 23:21:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 178479265 where the changeset comment is: revert changes that pretend to be made with vespucci but aren't
kartler175 (2026-02-01 12:13:47+00:00): Da ist wohl einiges schiefgegangen:
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=9.78917&lat=52.39608&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.95&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways
osmmapper222 (2026-02-01 21:06:52+00:00): Hallo kartler175,

während dem Hochladen des Changesets in JOSM gab es eine kurze Fehlermeldung (den genauen Wortlaut habe ich nicht mehr im Kopf), die damit zusammenhängen dürfte. 

Ich mache mich Schrittweise an die Wiederherstellung der Gebäudeumrisse.
osmmapper222 (2026-02-05 18:02:59+00:00): Alle selbst-überlappenden Polygone ist nun behoben und das Tool der Geofrabrik zeigt keine Fehler mehr an.
YomanNH (2026-02-03 15:08:25+00:00): Nie można tych zmian łączyć w większe changesety? Chciałem sprawdzić, czy Barroszt nie wrócił, ale widzę cały Toruń zawalony mikrozmianami.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-03 17:34:29+00:00): A w jaki sposób historię przeglądasz?

Co do łączenia - potencjalnie jest możliwe, tyle że to by było trzeba jakoś dopisać i to tak by innych problemów nie spowodować.

Dopiszę do pomysłów.
YomanNH (2026-02-03 17:45:58+00:00): Chyba najprostszy z możliwych - klikając "Zmiany" na stronie osm i patrząc na ostatnie changesety w oglądanym obszarze. Pewnie są lepsze narzędzia. Jak znasz jakieś dobre, to chętnie skorzystam. Kojarzę OsmCha, ale nie podeszło mi.
Nakaner (2026-03-06 18:03:14+00:00): Hi,

please be more careful when you edit OpenStreetMap data. In this changeset, you changed the boundary relation of Tuscania into a hiking route. Therefeore, the whole municipality disappeared from the map.

OpenStreetMap is more than just nodes and ways. Relations are the third main type of objects. They build large polygons, hiking routes, turn restrictions or train routes. You aren't new to OpenStreetMap any more. I would like to ask you to make yourself familiar with them. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Relationen

Best regards

Michael
Jordi MF (2026-02-07 00:30:40+00:00): Lo siento, pero la Wikipedia no es una fuente válida porque su licencia no es compatible con OSM. Este cambio no es correcto.
NeisBot (2026-01-31 21:24:22+00:00): Hi aegeanmapper, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 96% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 1 amenity(s)
- 87 building(s)
- 2 leisure(s)
- 2 sport(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177943662
user_23758309 (2026-01-31 21:26:58+00:00): Yes, I did it intentionally. There were many drawings of buildings in the area that didn't exist, and I erased them. This can also be confirmed by satellite imagery.
NeisBot (2026-02-01 06:57:27+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 30 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/41931400 v68 | 30 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177944038
rezemika (2026-02-04 19:01:54+00:00): Bonjour, et bienvenue sur OpenStreetMap !
Je passe juste pour m'assurer que vous ayez bien vu le message de @NeisBot ? Il y a quelques coquilles dans vos modifications : la zone résidentielle ("landuse=residential") a été transformée en bâtiment ("building=house"), et il y a des superpositions entre les polygones des petits bâtiments que vous avez ajouté. Pourriez-vous corriger ça svp ? :)
rezemika (2026-02-07 11:55:49+00:00): En absence de réponse, et vu les problèmes causés par ce changeset, j'ai fais un revert.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178224801
pitscheplatsch (2026-02-08 09:40:40+00:00): Thanks @rezemika
Dimitar155 (2026-02-01 07:56:56+00:00): Тяговите подстанции, които нямат отбелязан оператор, почти без изключения са на НКЖИ.

Само за малките подстанции по кварталите се чудя дали са на ЕРМ Запад/Електроразпределение Север/Електроразпределение Юг (според това в коя област се намират) или са на някоя друга компания.
map-dynartio (2026-02-01 10:50:28+00:00): Мерси, за тяговите подстанции, ще сложа този id за operator:wikidata - https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q6975183

За minor_distribution подстанциите по кварталите, би трябвало действително да са на една от трите електроразпределителни компании.

Но не знам кой е операторът на по-големите разпределителни подстанции (110 kV/20kV или 110 kV/10 kV). Например в София има тагнати с ЕСО (ПС Димитър Димитров или ПС Модерно предградие) и с ЕРМ Запад (ПС Студентски град, ПС Орион или ПС Рила). Има ли генерално правило ?

По същата логика, в градовете, в които има една единствена голяма разпределителна подстанция (110 kV / 20 kV), например Дупница, знаеш ли дали тя типично е на ЕСО или на ЕРМ Запад ?
Dimitar155 (2026-02-01 11:34:30+00:00): Много хубав въпрос. Аз съм ги тагвал като оперирани от ЕСО, защото изглежда логично да е така. Все пак те има станции за 110 и нагоре. Разпределителните дружества би следвало да се занимават с напрежение под 110 кВ. Поне аз така си мисля.

На ПС Рила обаче има табела че е на ЕРМ Запад. ПС Орион е база/офис на същата компания.

Иначе докато търсех информация случайно открих царски пищов с (предполагам всички) подстанции на ЕСО - https://webapps.eso.bg/zop_profile/page3download.php?id=48329&faID=63594&fn=1&fname=%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B6%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5%20%E2%84%96%203%20%D0%B7%D0%B0%20%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B0%20%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%B7%D0%B8%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%8F%20%E2%84%96%203.pdf
map-dynartio (2026-02-01 13:48:51+00:00): Оле невероятен е този пищов, благодаря, знам с какво ще се занимавам в следващите дни
NeisBot (2026-02-01 06:57:29+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 7 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1473222162 v1 | 4 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1473222161 v1 | 3 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177944524
NeisReview (2026-02-08 09:28:20+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/177944692
https://osm.org/changeset/177996009
mueschel (2026-02-08 09:06:31+00:00): Please don't just dump nodes from Overture to OSM. Always check if the objects already exist, and remove tags that don't belong to OSM. And, don't add "sidewalk" tags to arbitrary paths. These are only for actual sidewalks along roads.
NeisBot (2026-02-01 06:57:30+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 7 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1473222162 v2 | 4 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1473222161 v2 | 3 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177944692
BCNorwich (2026-02-02 08:38:44+00:00): Hi, You've placed your new 1.5 km roads, Way: 1473222162 and Way: 1473222161 across and on top of all the existing mapping. This surely can't be correct?

Are these proposed highways? If so, they should be tagged as such otherwise they could disrupt routing.

Regards Bernard.
JeroenHoek (2026-02-01 15:54:05+00:00): Als een instelling ingetekend is als vlak, is hem op een adresnode plaatsen een downgrade qua detail. Lees je even in over welke types objecten ook als vlak kunnen bestaan.
JeroenHoek (2026-02-01 15:55:37+00:00): Teruggedraaid in: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177970195
Leo Slager (2026-01-31 23:36:14+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
NeisBot (2026-02-01 06:58:15+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/35602819 v6

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Coworking space"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-02-08 09:31:19+00:00): ❌ Text fixed by https://osm.org/changeset/178030970
tguen (2026-02-05 23:59:10+00:00): Again, when editing building shapes please press Q to square the corners.
Dezza (2026-02-01 16:27:24+00:00): What was the source you used to confirm the correct house numbers?
OSM Warrior (2026-02-01 18:17:25+00:00): UPRN Database showed the postcode located on a different street on the USRN Database.
gurglypipe (2026-02-09 09:48:17+00:00): I’ve surveyed this in person now and the numbering is correct as per this changeset
felipeeugenio (2026-02-01 13:12:29+00:00): Hola. ok, pero la dirección sigue existiendo. No hay que borrar todo.
saludos
stasiu512 (2026-02-02 12:45:09+00:00): Ten zestaw również wycofany w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178005291.
perenniallylate (2026-01-31 23:15:40+00:00): Hi, seems like we did some duplicate work here :) I'll try to clean up the buildings i doubled up on yours
seattlefyi (2026-02-01 02:58:56+00:00): No problem, guess that’s the risk of pointing people to map the same area (and why the tasking mgr exists for HOT!). Thanks for noticing, and taking care of it (and mapping, too!)
kadiwa (2026-01-31 23:33:32+00:00): Bin natürlich auch für ein anderes Taggingschema offen, aber highway=construction ist jetzt nicht mehr angemessen. Man könnte aber argumentieren, dass die Straße noch immer eine highway=secondary ist und nur aus Sicherheitsgründen die Benutzung verboten ist (mit ganz normalen access-Tags).
mueschel (2026-02-01 09:45:14+00:00): Hallo,
hier ist etwas schief gegangen. Es sieht so aus, als hättest du Daten heruntergeladen als z.B. geojson und dann weiterbearbeitet. Das resultiert immer in Duplikaten der originalen Objekte. Daten müssen direkt in JOSM heruntergeladen werden, sonst gehen Referenzen verloren. 
Diese Änderungen hier habe ich deswegen zurückgesetzt.
Ótzï fón GlüϷgor (2026-02-01 11:00:28+00:00): Dank dir, heute morgen wollte ich die Hafas-IDs hinzufügen und dabei sind hier in diesem Bereich viele Haltestellen aus ihrer Relation rausgeflogen, habe dann alles was ich gesehen habe händisch wieder versucht zu beheben (hätte sowieso demnächst mal ausortiert werden müssen).
mueschel (2026-02-01 11:04:43+00:00): Nein nicht ganz: Die früher erfassten Haltestellen waren alle noch in den Relationen. Nur deine gestern neu hochgeladenen Haltestellen waren es nicht. Jetzt hatten wir in allen Relationen die Haltestellen doppelt enthalten.
Cristian Murillo (2026-02-21 09:57:25+00:00): Calle
ferog_v (2026-02-27 18:06:47+00:00): Hola Cristian disculpa ¿a que te refieres con calle?
ExoMal (2026-01-31 23:42:32+00:00): Oops, meant NCN 77.
schobbish (2026-02-01 00:25:51+00:00): Hey there, business nodes should be placed on the building they are in, not on the road. Also, please be sure to use the correct phone format. Looks like you are developing your own editor?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177947641
Omnific (2026-02-01 16:33:41+00:00): Hello, your edit is incorrect. While it does not exist on their website, it is a state park property, as noted in the tags that were on it. Please refer to https://geo.wa.gov/datasets/3385b003af5248e59c1fa68e1411c446_2/explore?location=47.264943%2C-120.839651%2C6 which plainly shows it. Reverting.
Omnific (2026-02-01 16:42:34+00:00): Please also see https://map.co.thurston.wa.us/vertigisstudio/web/?app=964be0c07359437bbd8ab7058716b670
Warin61 (2026-02-01 01:08:37+00:00): Error!
This is NZ SI Christchurch.
NeisBot (2026-02-01 06:57:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 16 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/316635992 v7 | 8 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177948453
DwightTee (2026-02-01 15:32:41+00:00): Thanks for the comments. When I went to save my work 2 errors showed up that were boundary lines that I did not add or change - Santos Tract and Ross Prairie. I have no idea why this happened and couldn't save my work without clicking on the lines and making a change or deleting them which I didn't want to do bc they're not mine. This is a trail system of hike/bike/horse trails that crisscross each other. There are no roads or highways or buildings in the  area. I did not change existing features even if they were labeled roads - which they're not. I only changed the "bike path" to "path" bc it is mixed use paved trail open to all users. What should I do about the "crossings'? How do I deal with this in the future? There are LOTS more equestrian trails to be added. I'd like to do it correctly the first time. Thanks for your assistance.
pitscheplatsch (2026-02-01 16:25:12+00:00): Hi DwightTee and thank you for your reply.

I think in your case, it seems the reported issues are false positives. The geometries were not changed in a way that would introduce new crossings, and the tagging adjustments did not create any new conflicts.

Sorry for the inconvenience, and thanks again for your map edits.

Regards,
Pascal
dzamper (2026-02-01 18:50:48+00:00): Dla stanowiska Zabrze Stadion 2 public_transport=platform już był dodany do https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9103979408 a ten tag powinien być w OSM naniesiony na tylko jeden obiekt per stanowisko

Prędzej bym usunął ten „peron” bo to de facto poszerzony w miejsce trawnika chodnik niż dodawał do niego ten tag
savsk (2026-02-04 09:02:15+00:00): nie jest to mojej roboty takie perony, ja jedynie uzupełniałem brakujące tagi ale mogę go usunąć
savsk (2026-02-04 09:05:21+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178084852
Fen <3 (2026-03-30 15:06:28+00:00): Hello friend!
rather than delete the path, it's more appropriate to leave them connected and and a locked gate onto the drive,
this will prevent routing across it, and will not be used in navigation.
Thank you for editing!
Hokkosha (2026-02-01 01:50:19+00:00): Hello,

I noticed that this changeset uses https://hello.hepco.co.jp/map/
 as the source.

I could not find any statement on that website that allows reuse under ODbL or a compatible license.
The site appears to be operated by Hokkaido Electric Power / Hokkaido Electric Power Network, and the disclaimer says the data comes from various third parties (local governments and industrial park operators).

Because of this, I am concerned that the data may not be legally usable for OpenStreetMap.

Could you please confirm that this source is compatible with OSM’s license, or consider reverting these edits if it is not?

Thank you for your understanding.
IAFAi (2026-02-01 10:29:49+00:00): Hi,

Thank you for your comment.

After reviewing the disclaimer, I can confirm that the changeset data in question falls under section "Power supply information" which does not contain third-party information (unlike information on Hokkaido businesses, real estate and tourism). 

Indeed there is no explicit mention of ODbL or a compatible license. Hence I will revert the edits to avoid further doubt.
Hokkosha (2026-02-01 15:36:45+00:00): Hello,

Thank you very much for checking and for reverting the edits.
I appreciate your understanding regarding the license issue.