piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Szymson (2025-02-25 20:04:13+00:00): Dobra, możesz działać
stasiu512 (2025-02-25 20:14:40+00:00): Zanim zacznę to mam parę uwag, raczej zapomniałeś o oneway=yes na łącznicach i ewentualnych restrykcjach jeśli jest linia ciągła. Dodatkowo zatoczek nie oznaczamy obszarem highway=platform czy
public_transport=platform bo nie jest to miejsce gdzie oczekują pasażerowie, tak jak jest to napisane na wiki. Jeśli chcesz bardzo oznaczyć zatoki to tniesz linie highway na długość zatoczki i do tej linii dodajesz tag https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bus_bay i w zależności od strony left lub right. Kolejność w relacjach autobusowych uzupełnię tym się nie martw. Daj znać czy będziesz z tym jakoś działać.
Szymson (2025-02-25 20:23:26+00:00): Oneway naprawione, restrykcje dodane
Szymson (2025-02-25 20:24:38+00:00): Punkty przystanków są w miejscach gdzie stoi znak, zgodnie z wcześniejszymi uwagami w którejś z dyskusji:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12618933905
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12618933906
stasiu512 (2025-02-25 20:46:26+00:00): Dzięki za reakcję z tymi punktami, poprawiłem trasy linii 288, jakbyś miał jakieś inne problemy z relacjami autobusowymi to śmiało pisz na dc albo pv. Moja zmiana: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162948738
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-02-25 00:07:40+00:00): This changeset removed the highway tag
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162747078
UYMapper (2025-02-21 06:52:31+00:00): Si, yo también estuve buscando info oficial de la Intendencia de Canelones y no pude encontrar, pero sé que hay confusión respecto al nombre de este lago: hay quienes lo conocen como Botavara (incluso había una disco con ese nombre allí al borde del lago, años atrás), y hay quienes lo conocen como Calcagno.

Creo que Botavara es el nombre que tradicionalmente siempre tuvo. Lo que no sé es si en algún momento se cambió oficialmente o si es que algunas personas comenzaron a llamarlo así por cercanía a la Av.Calcagno.

Pero parece que la confusión es bastante generalizada, porque incluso había encontrado una nota de prensa que en el título hacía referencia a "Lago Botavara / Calcagno".
Nachof (2025-02-21 19:52:57+00:00): Google Maps lo tiene como Lago Calcagno, pero claro que Google Maps no es una fuente, y no sabemos cuál es su fuente tampoco.

Hablé con gente que va a navegar ahí y ellos lo conocen como Lago Calcagno, por eso puse el nombre alternativo. 

Intentando buscar el nombre oficial me encontré con https://www.imcanelones.gub.uy/proyectos/arquitectura/espacio-lago-calcagno que es una nota sobre el acondicionamiento del Lago Calcagno. No muestra mapa, pero por las fotos ese es el lago de Calcagno al sur (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37659308) que acá está marcado como Lago Shangrilá (y que Google Maps coincide).

En ese lago hay cartelería sobre las obras que se hicieron, posiblemente esté el nombre, así que cuando pase por ahí voy a intentar fijarme qué dice.
NeisBot (2025-02-20 19:31:47+00:00): Hello, thank you for your contribution.

I noticed that some of the tags and descriptions you've used appear to be related to #SEO #spam. I recommend reading the following page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Spam

Could you please confirm if your map edits here were intentional?

#MapWithoutSpam #TagSmartNotSpam
NeisRevert (2025-03-13 10:05:20+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/162760035
maro21 (2025-02-20 21:02:14+00:00): Wandalizm wycofany
enezeg (2025-03-11 09:46:27+00:00): Bonjour, votre association est située à deux endroits différents sur la carte :  au 9 rue du M. Joffre et dans le bâtiment situé à l'intersection entre cette rue et la rue du minage ? quel est le bon emplacement ? merci !
Club Invention - Europe (2025-03-11 12:18:02+00:00): Bonjour Enezeg,

Notre association est exactement au 9 rue du Maréchal Joffre, dans une ancienne boutique, en face de la Coop.

Cordialement

Peter TEMEY
Président du Club Invention - Europe
enezeg (2025-03-11 12:37:28+00:00): Merci, l'emplacement a été corrigé. Cordialement
Club Invention - Europe (2025-03-11 13:25:58+00:00): C'est plutôt moi qui vous remercie.

Cordialement
eggie (2025-02-20 16:56:36+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Langlaeufer (2025-02-20 16:36:36+00:00): Oh meine Bemerkung  bzgl. Wehrer Weg und motor_vehicle=no war zu diesem Changeset.
Langlaeufer (2025-02-20 16:38:13+00:00): Kannst du mir sagen, wie der Weg StVO-technisch beschildert ist?
Henning Maibaum (2025-03-09 16:35:39+00:00): Hallo.
Ich war seit längerem mal wieder in Klein Döhren.
Dort steht VKZ 26 Verbot für PKW und Motorräder.
Landwirtschaftlicher Verkehr frei,
Anlieger frei.

Grüße
Langlaeufer (2025-03-09 17:14:08+00:00): Danke, ich habe access entsprechend angepasst.
Taya_S (2025-02-20 16:31:07+00:00): Reverted SEO vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162748937
notmyproblem1 (2025-02-24 10:56:13+00:00): Ciao nilogian, il tuo commento non è di tanto aiuto, (vedi https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Good_changeset_comments ) la prossima volta specifica cosa hai modificato (e magari anche un perchè)
limes11 (2025-02-20 19:01:23+00:00): Hallo,

das ist so nicht sinnvoll. Lifecycle-Tags sollen das Neueintragen verhindern, mehr nicht. disused:office und ggf. noch ein begründetes old_name, aber nicht die ganzen veralteten Detailattribute.

Die Adresse ist hier prinzipiell nicht falsch, aber wenn's stört, dann einfach entfernen. 

Schöne Grüße

Limes
Euskirchener (2025-02-20 19:32:41+00:00): Hallo limes11,
das verstehe ich nicht bzw. teile die Meinung in meinem jetzigen Verständnis deines Kommentars nicht.
Die Lifecycle prefixes sind laut Wiki z.B. für Objekte, die nicht mehr vorhanden sind, gedacht (jetzt mal unabhängig davon, ob disused oder removed etc. besser passt). Das trifft ja hier zu, das Büro gibt es nicht mehr. Löscht man wie der Mapper "Pango86" jedoch nur die Tags, die das Büro bezeichnen, aber lässt die Adress-Tags übrig, hinterlässt man einen unnötigen doppelten Adress-Eintrag redundant zum Gebäudeumriss, der z.B. in QA-Tools als Fehler gemeldet wird. Deshalb sollen meiner Meinung nach wenn schon denn schon alle Tags "inaktiv" gesetzt werden, weil der Node nur den Sinn des Büros hat(te) und sonst nichts weiter. Mir geht es also nur darum, dass keine doppelten Adresseinträge ohne weiteren Sinn übrigbleiben. Völlig dahingestellt sei mal, ob man sowas überhaupt aufbewahrt oder gleich den ganzen Node löscht, weil die Firma halt weg ist, aber das ist eine andere Diskussion.
Gruß
Euskirchener
limes11 (2025-02-20 19:52:37+00:00): Hallo Euskirchener, 

ja, ich denke wir sind einer Meinung. Nur die Adresse stehen zu lassen, ist nicht wirklich sinnvoll (auch wenn ich kein Fan der QA-Tools bin). 

Entweder Knoten komplett weg oder removed/disused:office=yes, ohne Adresse und ohne die übrigen Tags. Das verhindert dann die Neueintragung von der Couch aus und zeigt an, dass der Gebäude problemlos wieder als Büro genutzt werden kann. Mir ging es um diese zusätzliche Detailtags des Vorbesitzer. Die sind jetzt historisch und sollten nicht mehr in osm erscheinen.

Viele Grüße
Limes
limes11 (2025-02-21 22:43:57+00:00): Ich habe die Tags entfernt.
eggie (2025-02-20 17:00:35+00:00): Dag Jadey  Je hebt er wel een multipolygoon van gemaakt. Met welk doel?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-02-20 17:07:31+00:00): De mp heb ik weer omgezet naar een polygoon. 
MVG
eggie
Jadey- (2025-02-20 17:13:31+00:00): Ah, dit zal wel door de merge zijn gebeurd waardoor er tijdelijk 2 polygonen waren, deze had ik gemist. Thanks!
watmildon (2025-11-28 01:27:15+00:00): Love "mascot:name". Tremendous.
joost schouppe (2025-03-31 14:43:11+00:00): Hoi Tom,
Een kinderdagverblijf is inderdaad childcare, zoals je eerst had gedaan. Let er verder op dat als je de hoofd-tag op de site zet, je de informatie verwijdert van het gebouw erbinnen (anders maak je dubbels). Je hebt hier ook van de site een gebouw gemaakt (in een eerdere changeset).
Alles gecorrigeerd nu.
Tom Ameye (2025-04-02 19:39:22+00:00): Hartelijk dank voor de correcties!
NeisBot (2025-02-20 17:01:07+00:00): Hello, thank you for your contribution!

I noticed that some of the tags and descriptions you've used appear to be related to #SEO #spam. I recommend reading the following page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Spam

Could you please confirm if your map edits here were intentional?

#MapWithoutSpam #TagSmartNotSpam
Taya_S (2025-02-20 17:07:27+00:00): Reverted SEO vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162750326
literan (2025-02-22 16:50:08+00:00): а в чем причина удаления этого и других названий?
sanchi (2025-03-05 15:19:00+00:00): Hola
Hasta qué punto ha cambiado a asfaltado?
Has cambiado hasta bastante fuera del pueblo, llega hasta la autovía. Cosa que me parece rara.
Un saludo
NaAiz34 (2025-03-05 15:42:46+00:00): Buenas,
La calle ha sido completamente hasfaltada con brea, dejando de ser un camino de grava. He cambiado el tramo que va desde la ZA-L-2566 hacia el pueblo. Este camino se asfalto con el fin de facilitar tanto el acceso desde el pueblo como desde la mencionada carretera a el area de descanso para caravanas. Lo metros que abarcan de la entrada del area de caravanas a la carretera han sido hormigonados para que los camiones que usan la bascula situada justo en frente no se agriete con facilidad.
Un saludo
sanchi (2025-03-05 15:58:38+00:00): La vía esta cambiada hasta pegar con la autovía. Es una una vía todo ese trazado, hay que dividirla donde corresponda en 2 y etiquetarlas por separado.
Un saludo
unni-geo (2025-02-22 15:46:09+00:00): FYI: habe das Gebäude an https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1361481385 durch Änderung https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162820587 entfernt...
RSun (2025-02-22 16:41:45+00:00): Hallo, wenn ich das richtig erkenne, hat du entfernt, was ich als Vereinsgelände eintragen wollte. Entschuldige meinen Fehler. Wie macht man es denn richtig mit dem Vereinsgelände? Andere Flächen wie Einzelhandel, Gewerbegebiet, etc. hab ich gefunden, aber Vereinsgelände?
unni-geo (2025-02-27 07:45:33+00:00): Hallo ich hatte am Flächenobjekt (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1361481385/history) das building=yes Merkmal entfernt, weil diese Fläche kein so grosses Gebäude darstellt. Falls es einen Verein zugeordent werden soll kommt eventuell operator=* und operator:type=association in Frage (siehe wiki's: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:operator / https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:operator:type) ...
user_5359 (2025-02-22 11:57:24+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1361482622. What is the mean of the tags
    CITYTOWN_N = Peekskill
    CITYTOWN_S = 551200
    MUNNAME = Peekskill
    SWIS = 551200
(only unknown keys)
cuzi (2025-02-20 20:28:55+00:00): Regarding the traffic islands: the paths for the pedestrian crossings need to be connected, they shouldn't stop at the traffic island. If the path stops at the traffic island, navigation software will treat the path as a cul-de-sac and not navigate on it. You can either just draw the paths through the traffic island or you can create extra paths on the traffic island (connected to the paths outside of the island) and label them highway=footway & footway=traffic_island.
TheNet1996 (2025-06-01 06:03:25+00:00): Hallo,
was soll das für ein Tagging sein?
farmyard=kläranlage
Viele Grüße
Mike
Taya_S (2025-02-20 17:24:28+00:00): Reverted SEO vandalism.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162750931
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-30 16:45:54+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/50958733/history - are you sure about intermittent=no ?

on aerial it is missing water
Hufkratzer (2025-02-21 20:33:06+00:00): Hi,
What is a "Horse HIghline"? Are you sure it is a horseback riding center? You have tagged this node as a horseback riding center (leisure=horse_riding). A horseback riding center usually has some extension and can be seen on Bing or so, but there seems to be just forest where this node is.
Similar nodes:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12604340486
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12604412814
Compare:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=horse_riding
Jbensman (2025-02-22 01:45:50+00:00): There are some places where horses are not allowed to go.  So they have places to tie the horses up when they walk into the area.  Basically it is rope tied between trees.  They are called a Highline.  That was the best match I could find  Open to suggestions for a better option.  But I am going to go back and put a note on them explaining what they are.
Hufkratzer (2025-02-22 11:04:11+00:00): Suggestion: amenity=animal_hitch + animal_hitch=highline,
animal_hitch=highline should then be documented in
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=animal_hitch
Hufkratzer (2025-02-22 11:21:21+00:00): https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Highline.jpg ?
Hufkratzer (2025-02-24 21:06:43+00:00): You mapped 4 additional horse highlines with tag leisure=horse_riding: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12613530437
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12613449774
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12613455055
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12613623742

Horse highlines are no riding centers; tagging them with leisure=horse_riding is a misuse of this tag. I made a suggestion how they could be tagged above.

Can you please stop tagging horse highlines as horse riding centers?
Jbensman (2025-02-25 22:22:23+00:00): I tried to find the tag in the editor and could not find it.  I would offer to let you change them and the other ones I have not got to, but I found one tagged like that at Garden of the Gods and it does not display on the map in OSMAnd.  Anyone who rides horses in Shawnee knows what they are and that they must be used.  There are big fines if they get caught and the trails will get closed to horses if they don't use them.  It is a really big deal in Shawnee.  Any horse user is going to know what it is and to use it.  The areas they cannot go in are very sensitive and horses can devastate the area.   Since I am adding the trails they ride, I think it is vital that they can see it on the map.  I have a note on all of them that explains what it is.
Hufkratzer (2025-02-27 11:48:11+00:00): Thanks for the explanation. Can you send me link to the highline at Garden of the Gods; i couldn't find it.
Jbensman (2025-02-27 19:57:18+00:00): Yea even on the website all it is is a tiny dot.  https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12500904404#map=19/37.605669/-88.385262
Hufkratzer (2025-02-28 22:51:21+00:00): I don't know of any map that renders amenity=hitching_post or amenity=animal_hitch. This will certainly not happen with the maps offered on osm.org until thousands of such things have been mapped. So far there are only a few hundred. Even leisure=horse_riding, of which 19k have been mapped, is only rendered on a few maps so far, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:leisure=horse_riding#Rendering. To see the horse highlines on a map, you could add another tag, which will be rendered. But to do that would be against OSM conventions, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer. Or make your own map using the OSM data.

These tags are also not in the presets of the editors. For iD you can open a request like https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/issues/233. For JOSM you can add a preset in https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Presets/NewTags yourself.

If you don't object, I will retag the horse highlines. Do you think that horse highlines can be called hitching posts? If not I will will retag them to amenity=animal_pitch + animal_pitch=xxx; should xxx be "highline" or "high_line"? There are also "picket lines" (two words), see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Picket_line. Can you upload a photo without copyright restrictions of such a horse highline on wikimedia commons or in the OSM wiki for the documentation in the wiki? https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Highline.jpg is not suitable because it shows a temporary highline which therefore should not be mapped in OSM.
Jbensman (2025-03-01 17:50:52+00:00): I am not following you.  Is this really a big deal?  Here is a picture I took of the one at Indian Kitchen.  https://drive.google.com/file/d/1jYSvSqGbEkYNAX1HPm--_IAfc_C-XKp1/view?usp=sharing I have added at least 3 more.  The only thing I care about is they show on the map.  If you want to try changing 1 to see if it shows up on the map, I am OK with that.
Hufkratzer (2025-03-01 21:23:11+00:00): What do you mean with "the map"? OsmAnd?
Jbensman (2025-03-01 22:44:27+00:00): OSMAnd
Hufkratzer (2025-03-02 22:44:31+00:00): If you want to see horse highlines in OsmAnd that are tagged with an appropriate tag (e.g. amenity=animal_hitch) but are not shown there, you can ask the maintainers of OsmAnd to add the rendering in OsmAnd. I'm not familiar with OsmAnd because I don't map with my phone; but if you are an OsmAnd user, you can certainly do it yourself. I assume https://github.com/osmandapp/OsmAnd/issues is a good place for that.

If you don't know (and don't want to learn) how to retag your already mapped horse highline nodes from leisure=horse_riding to amenity=animal_hitch or something else, I can do it for you with your permission. But then the nodes will probably no longer be shown in OsmAnd until the rendering of the corresponding tag has been added there. Please let me know what you want to do.
Jbensman (2025-03-03 00:12:48+00:00): Back to my question.  Why is this a big deal that requires all this time? It is about 6 items that anyone can easily determine what it is.   Is there some generic or misc tag?
Hufkratzer (2025-03-03 11:25:38+00:00): You have mapped not 6 but 11 horse highlines and tagged them as riding centres (and once you have mapped a riding centre correctly: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12496714162). And you only started with OSM 2 months ago. How are you going to continue? Should the whole of the USA be covered in incorrectly tagged horse highlines in a few years' time? The more often a tag is used incorrectly, the more useless it becomes. I don't know of any tag that is intended to make any text appear anywhere on the maps. That is not the principle of how OSM works. The notes are readable for humans, but cannot be processed automatically.
Jbensman (2025-03-03 17:28:51+00:00): I may have only been on OSM for 2 months, but I have added thousands of items.  In 2 months I have added half as many as you have done in over 10 years.  I told you I am open for a workable solution.   But you have offered none.  Your solution is to make you feel important by adding a tag no one in the area using the map can see.  My solution is using a close tag that people using it in the area can see and easily know what it is.  How many of these areas have you been too?  I and many others spent countless hours documenting the damage the horses were doing and getting the Forest Service to create the highlines to protect the areas.  I think protecting these areas is much more important than making you feel important.  Unless you are the OSM police, I no longer care what you think.
Allison P (2025-03-04 09:07:13+00:00): Jbensman,
I realize this discussion has been one-on-one so far, but what Hufkratzer says does reflect community-wide consensus. While there is no OSM police, moderators absolutely do ensure OSM principles are applied by correcting data such as that which you have mapped.

Edit-measuring contests are childish, and don't work in your favor anyhow, as Hufkratzer has contributed to the OSM wiki and various code repositories. What you are doing is called "tagging for the renderer", which you can read about on said wiki. The basic principle is to not break OSM just to fix some map. Using the wrong tag might make sense for your use, but it confuses everyone else.

Hufkratzer has very nicely offered several solutions that don't go against the principles of the site. No one is trying to make themselves "feel important", we're just trying to improve the correctness of the map. Your map is no more valuable than anyone else's. Keep that in mind when deciding whether it's a big deal to "break" it for everyone else for your own needs.
Jbensman (2025-03-04 13:05:16+00:00): He was very insulting and he has not offered a single solution that would work, i.e., have them show on the map.    I would be very happy to do anything that would simply show on the map.  What good is putting something on the map that does not show on the map? If there is a better tag that will show on the map, I will be happy to use it.
Allison P (2025-03-04 18:05:34+00:00): I'm sorry, but I don't see how he was being insulting. Furthermore, what may work for you doesn't necessarily work for everyone else. This is why such principles as "don't tag for the renderer" exist. I hate to take it in this direction, but you do need to conform to tagging principles and avoid arguing with other users about their application. If you don't want to hear it from me, then I can refer you to the Data Working Group.

If this issue is very important to you, the best solution is to come up with a design proposal for OSM Carto and OSMAnd for leisure=animal_hitch. But breaking the map is never allowed.
Hufkratzer (2025-03-04 19:38:57+00:00): @Allison P:
I wrote to the DWG last night already and asked them to take a look at this discussion. (That was the first time I ever wrote to them.) That's why I first thought that's why you commented here. But if you're not one of them, someone else from DWG may show up here anyway,
Jbensman (2025-03-04 21:59:50+00:00): I wish you would have contacted them much sooner!  They were very nice and had a very simple and much better solution: tag them as Trail riding stations.  They show up much better on the map.  I think I have most of them changed, but probably missed a couple.  If you run across one, feel free to change it to trail riding station.
Hufkratzer (2025-03-05 18:27:46+00:00): Done in
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163254860
and
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163255503
amundell (2025-02-20 17:44:10+00:00): This should be 129 not 127 Langestraat
Glassman (2025-02-21 17:00:49+00:00): Please provide a changeset comment. These comments can help you and others.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162752010
somehundred (2025-02-20 18:23:01+00:00): Instead of "not:brand:wikidata" you should add the "operator:wikidata" tag which is Q132157239 in this case.
felipeeugenio (2025-02-20 19:42:00+00:00): Hola.
No entiendo muy bien la edición. Ahora hay dos registros civiles. Hay dos realmente? o trató de eliminar uno?

Además tomó un paradero de buses y lo transformó en un restaurant, pero conservando el nombre. Fue intencional eso?
saludos
Glassman (2025-02-21 17:03:18+00:00): Instead of adding a node for landuse, it's better to add the information to the existing landuse.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162752239
eggie (2025-02-20 18:48:06+00:00): Dag B Bas

Wat is je bron dat je er maar 15 km/u mag rijden. Is het een woonerf?
highway=living_street
Staat dat bord er?
Meestal zijn tweewielers uitgezonderd van oneway=yes
Is dat hier ook het geval.. Dan bijtaggen oneway:bicycle=no en evt ook voor mofa en moped.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-02-20 18:50:41+00:00): Verder is het nw stuk een impossible oneway
Hoe komt daar ooit een auto?
B_Bas (2025-02-20 19:07:53+00:00): Bedankt, ik heb hem geupdate. Het is inderdaad een woonerf, er staat een bord bij de begin van de straat. Daarnaast is het 2 richting tot de parkeergarage. Dus dit ook aangepast. Het is een apart straatje. :)
eggie (2025-02-20 19:48:54+00:00): Dat stuk vanaf het fietspad tot aan de splitsing heb ik van oneway=yes gehaald. Dat kan fysiek nooit oneway=yes zijn. 
Gr eggie
eggie (2025-02-20 19:14:35+00:00): Oke... prima..maar nu dat losse eindje aan de noordzijde.
Dat kan m.i.  nooit oneway=yes zijn 
Faar kun je allen uit.. maar nooit in met bv een auto.
Gr eggie