piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
fortera_au (2025-09-30 22:26:56+00:00): I'll have to double check with an allowed data source or in person, but I believe A5 actually goes along Greenhill Road for a small portion, until the Goodwood Road intersection. The section you've removed definitely looks like it was mistakenly added.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172661279
stanjohnson (2025-10-01 11:42:51+00:00): That stretch of Greenhill Road is most definitely R1 (as stated by the signs on approach to both intersections - unless they're incorrect!)

It's possible that was the case in the days of the old A21 ring route, of which Goodwood Road between Greenhill Road and West Terrace was a part.
fortera_au (2025-10-01 11:50:09+00:00): It's definitely R1, I'm wondering if it's part of two routes then. I'll check DataSA at some point, there's a routes dataset in there.
stanjohnson (2025-10-01 12:05:38+00:00): I have had a look at the "Road Route Numbers" dataset myself and it appears to just be R1; whereas South Road between Richmond Road and James Congdon Drive, for example, is designated R1 and A2 (I struggle to think of another such case). The corresponding signs also state both.

Interestingly, I noticed that they've got Victoria Road (to Outer Harbor) designated A16 in that dataset, despite the corresponding signs stating A9.
dypa (2025-10-01 06:40:52+00:00): знак существует на местности, ваша правка отменена

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172690396
VictorIE (2025-11-04 02:29:33+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37777696/history

How come you deleted the building tags and replaced them with tags that are already on the amenity=college object?
Own Oh (2025-11-04 14:27:28+00:00): I wasn't aware I had deleted that tag so happy to replace.
eggie (2025-09-30 14:32:49+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback Ik heb alle accesstags onder access=private gevangen. Dan zal het voor niemand routeren. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
JeKo1987 (2025-09-30 14:47:27+00:00): Bedankt voor je aanpassing!
JeKo1987 (2025-09-30 14:47:41+00:00): Bedankt voor je aanpassing!
Frans S (2025-10-01 10:58:04+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
 A few remarks.
Do not cluster buildings and map it as 1 building.
Do not give generic names to buildings.
Just building=yes is sufficient.
Did you not notice the Issue triangle warning for that issue ?

You did not map the visible round buildings as well as the gray/brownish rectangular building
They ought to be mapped as well.

See the image on the comment section.
Best regards and keep mapping
Famlam (2025-10-11 18:06:29+00:00): Hi Neet, what's the source for that this becomes a residential street? According to the 'verkeersbesluit' I only see a footway there. (Neglecting temporary constructions roads that are there now)

Also the road that it connects to is supposed to become a path or footway after construction is over, to my knowledge?
(Part of it is now closed with C1, so I assume they start transforming that soon and made it a path for that reason)
Neet (2025-10-11 18:13:14+00:00): Geen idee wat de uiteindelijke situatie gaat worden, maar er gaan wel huizen gebouwd worden en dit hebben ze bestraat.
eggie (2025-09-30 14:39:38+00:00): Dag Marten. Heeft het pand ook geen adres meer?

Ik heb de adresnode hersteld.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-09-30 14:41:40+00:00): Na jaren weer een bijdrage, maar nog geen welkomstmail ontvangen.. Bij deze opnieuw Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
mga_geo (2025-10-01 05:19:54+00:00): Bonjour,
J'ai l'impression qu'il y un problème suite à la modification, la ligne de bus r9292178 n'est plus continue: deux segments qui se superposent ?
Marc
Lisapple (2025-10-08 16:47:08+00:00): Merci Marc de me l'avoir signalé.
Effectivement, j'ai modifié deux fois la relation (pour deux highways différentes) et seul le premier way a été supprimé de la relation (sans doute Ctrl+Z accidentel).
C'est corrigé.
will l (2025-10-01 22:27:04+00:00): Hi Jeff, thanks for your recent edits to OSM.  I just wanted to mention two points:

1) When mapping crosswalks, it is really helpful to join them to the way they are crossing and tag the node as highway=crossing so it is clear that there is a junction between the two nodes (rather than a bridge or tunnel).  This can help with routing etc.

2) It is also helpful to create crossings that are connected to other sidewalks at the ends otherwise they are "islands" that are disconnected from other infrastructure. Likewise, this also helps with routing.

Thanks!
s777n (2026-06-10 15:19:11+00:00): Здравствуйте. Вы опять продублировали имя. Имя школы добавляется на территорию и уже добавлено - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/99745290 Удалил
notmyproblem1 (2025-10-01 10:51:09+00:00): Ciao caro, non usare la imagery di OpenStreetMap, Il building non è cosi largo, procederò a ripristanare alla vers 1
notmyproblem1 (2025-10-01 10:51:48+00:00): Ripristinato;
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172700409
GanderPL (2025-09-30 14:48:44+00:00): Sugeruję uzupełnić o:

```
operator=APCOA Parking
operator:type=private
operator:wikidata=Q296108
```


Źródło: https://nsi.guide/index.html?t=operators&k=amenity&v=parking&tt=apcoa

Dodatkowo AI na pytanie o bilety z parkomatów, zwróciło mi ten zasób (jeszcze go nie używałem):

```
authentication:ticket=yes
```

Źródło: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:authentication:*
GanderPL (2025-09-30 14:50:59+00:00): Możesz zostawić notkę z prośbą o oznaczenia parkomatów.
kwiatek_123 (2025-09-30 14:57:48+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172664659

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172664834
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-24 16:56:42+00:00): reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410  and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969  remain not answered

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173727488
eserte (2025-10-01 05:39:31+00:00): Hallo Traffikant,

ist der östliche Betriebsweg an der A100 tatsächlich schon offen?

-- Slaven
Traffikant (2025-10-01 07:45:13+00:00): Hallo Slaven, 
danke für die Rückmeldung.
Ich muss da morgen wieder vorbei, da mache ich nochmal eine QM vor Ort.
Wenn der Baustellenzaun den Weg noch absperrt, dann setze ich den Weg auf <<highway=construction>>, oder gibt es eine bessere Lösung dafür?

Gibt es sonst irgendwelche Auffälligkeiten im Bereich AS Sonnenallee? 

Es ist mein erster etwas größerer Umbau im OSM...
Traffikant (2025-10-02 21:28:12+00:00): Heute nachmittag (02.10.2025) waren die Bauzäune leider alle weiterhin noch verschlossen. 
Radwege und Betriebswege sind einschl. Markierung augenscheinlich fertig. 
LSA-Querungen für Rad- und Fußverkehr sind alle in Betrieb.
eserte (2025-10-05 16:08:21+00:00): highway=construction ist eine pragmatische Lösung. Ich beobachte jedenfalls, dass bei so getaggten Ways regelmäßig Updates von Streetcomplete-Usern kommen (aktualisiertes check_date oder das Umwandeln des highway/construction-Tags).
mono11 (2025-12-29 20:25:40+00:00): Ik ben het hier niet mee eens. Ik zou het op secondary hebben gehouden. Dit is geen officiele ringweg maar een gebiedsontsluitingsweg.
multichill (2025-12-29 21:45:00+00:00): Klopt dat het geen ringweg is. Dit is de N201 van Zandvoort naar Hilversum. De beschrijving op de wiki is hier vrij duidelijk over.
eggie (2025-09-30 15:31:39+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
notmyproblem1 (2025-10-01 10:48:35+00:00): Ciao & benvenuta cara! Grazie dei tuoi contributi, Nei changeset perfavore specifica cosa hai eliminato, aggiunto, modificato etc. per il commento del tuo changeset momentaneo sembra più per un tag "Fonte" e non Commento del changeset (che hai usato già il tag fonte, brava!)

Controlla https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Good_changeset_comments per altre informazioni! =D
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-24 16:56:16+00:00): reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410  and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969  remain not answered

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173727474
rarad74 (2025-10-02 07:59:10+00:00): Hi. Why you delete junction lanes and other details? You think that others work on this map in order for you to mock them?
dcskobuffs (2025-10-02 21:26:55+00:00): Hello rarad74,

This junction was originally modeled as a simple junction and I restored it as such based on OSM policy which indicates “roads are not to be mapped as dual carriageways if the two directions are only separated by paint. This includes single or multiple painted centre lines, hatched areas, channelized turn lanes, two-way turn lanes” (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Dual_carriageway). Looking at aerial imagery and Mapillary (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=45.11552551063838&lng=25.006321772432557&z=17&pKey=1222689252766690&focus=photo), there is only paint and no physical separation, which is in alignment with this policy.

My understanding of this policy is that modeling only useful detail over excessive detail allows the map to be maintained easier over time, as detailed paint separations can quickly become outdated or redesigned. Because this junction functions well without lane separation, it seemed reasonable to maintain its simplicity. That being said, If you see reason to keep the highway divided here, I am happy to defer to your edits.
Mikhail Kuzin (2025-10-15 01:52:51+00:00): Добрый день, сломали школу
Mikhail Kuzin (2025-10-15 01:53:31+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/457412131#map=19/54.974170/73.395039
user_5359 (2025-10-04 04:54:01+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/13184392127. What is the mean of the tag "vrsta elementa"= "Iznajmljivanje građevinske opreme"?
Did you miss an additional amenity=recycling?
AndyB_66 (2025-09-30 19:19:05+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
NeisBot (2025-09-30 16:06:42+00:00): Hi Jan Anne Noorman, welcome and thanks for your contribution!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

Based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Added 153 nodes, created 37 ways with building attributes"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
SomeoneElse2 (2025-10-03 16:49:34+00:00): For info, I've extended https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1378901507/history across the road here, as the Teesdale Way is signed across the road here.
eggie (2025-09-30 18:50:24+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
silversurfer83 (2025-10-01 20:38:00+00:00): thanks for catching my typo :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172669438
user_5359 (2025-09-30 19:04:06+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the two nodes https://www.osm.org/node/12030019051, https://www.osm.org/node/12132571436 more than 100 meters. Please check the correct position
Blaine Davis (2025-09-30 19:40:06+00:00): I didn't know I changed this. How do I revert to version 1?
user_5359 (2025-10-01 08:15:37+00:00): I have made the changes (using JOSM). You are welcome.
NeisBot (2025-09-30 17:16:41+00:00): Merhaba Hasan123456789, hoşgeldiniz ve katkılarınız için teşekkür ederiz!

İşbirliğini kolaylaştırmak ve diğerlerinin düzenlemelerinizi anlamalarına yardımcı olmak için yaptığınız değişikliklere kısa bir açıklama eklemek en iyisidir. Açık yorumlar topluluğun çalışmalarınızı takip etmesine ve daha iyi geri bildirimde bulunmasına yardımcı olur. İyi yorum yazma ipuçlarını burada[1] bulabilirsiniz.

Bu changeset'teki harita düzenlemelerinize dayanarak, bir yorum nasıl olabileceğine dair bir öneri hazırladım: "Bir düğümün geometrisini ayarladım"
(Auto-translation)
---
Hi Hasan123456789, welcome and thanks for your contribution!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

Based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Adjusted geometry of a node"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
aTarom (2025-09-30 20:06:35+00:00): Hola Jordi0147, s'ha quedat aquest portal com a banc?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6205781630/history
el pots revisar?
Salutacions
Jordi0147 (2025-10-01 13:58:22+00:00): No hi ha cap banc en aquesta adreça.
NieWnen (2025-09-30 19:55:44+00:00): Zaktualizowałem tagowanie Olejomatu – kilka już ich dodałem :P

Dzięki za dodanie i zlinkowanie zdjęcia!
Anas masuris (2025-09-30 19:58:34+00:00): O widzisz xd Na forum pytałem jak otagować, ale proszsz :)
NieWnen (2025-09-30 20:01:05+00:00): A nie widziałem, już odpowiadam.
Matt McCutchen (2025-10-06 20:49:50+00:00): Addendum to the source tag: I consulted aerial imagery for a general sense of scale, not to trace the actual new geometry (the images I could find hadn't updated yet).  The imagery might have been any of the following: Esri World Imagery; Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta; Bing.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-09-30 18:42:48+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/547510619

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2025-09-30 22:24:48+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/547510619

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
wildmaps (2025-11-26 21:13:25+00:00): Hi Haftpflicht,

thank you for your edit and your contribution! I checked your changeset and noticed that you added addr: tags to a building way. In Italy, addresses refer to the entrance of a house or property, so the established practice and consense is to map house numbers only as separate nodes at the entrance.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask at any time.

Best regards,
wildmaps
mona_magdy (2025-10-01 06:51:55+00:00): Hello, OR174;
I want to thank you for your contribution to improving the OSM maps in Mauritania. I noticed that you changed the classification of these roads (w1228842667, w1431990600) from 'highway=residential' to 'highway=primary'. Then I changed it to 'highway=unclassified' in this changeset (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172553243) because it is a logical classification, based on the OSM policy
Here are these links:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=unclassified
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=primary,
which states that the "primary" classification has specific criteria, the primary classification is generally reserved for major national or regional routes with higher traffic importance.. Could you please consider adjusting the classification to better reflect the nature of the area?
Regards
mona_magdy
bxl-forever (2025-09-30 19:19:13+00:00): Hello, and welcome to OSM.

Along with the category change for Nooit Gedacht, in the same changeset you also removed the name of a bank agency in Leuven: it still shows as a bank but with no name, yet it still refers to AXA’s website.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5131443817/history

Was it an intentional change or is this an error?
dendix (2025-09-30 23:22:52+00:00): Hello,

Was not aware the name removal was still present in the change.

The bank agency closed already 2 years ago. I tried deleting it by removing the name but that did not work.

Should be replaced by a shop, but I realized I could not yet find the correct amenity for that. So to be corrected after some study work... in the mean time the absence of the name is better than the incorrect name?
bxl-forever (2025-10-01 00:35:54+00:00): If a shop/amenity/bank closes down, removing the name… is just what it is: the place is still visible as an active business, but without a name.

The most important action is to remove the tag that describes what it was (in this case, amenity=bank).

But I see that you have changed it now, and your fix is good.

Have a nice day.
pitfire (2025-10-01 03:20:51+00:00): Hallo burrscurr,

danke für Deine Korrekturen. Überwege in Deutschland können mit crossing_ref=zebra "oder" mit crossing:markings=zebra erfasst werden!
Bitte nicht mit beiden Schlüsseln.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:crossing:markings?uselang=de

VG pitfire
burrscurr (2025-10-01 16:23:47+00:00): Hi pitfire,

danke für deine Rückmeldung. Ich habe persönlich keine starke Meinung dazu, ob Zebrastreifen nur entweder als crossing_ref=zebra ODER mit crossing:markings=zebra getaggt werden sollten. Das erscheint mir jedoch sinnvoll, weil crossing:markings ein internationaler verwendeter Schlüssel ist, während crossing_ref=zebra mehr oder weniger eine deutsche "Sonderlösung" ist. Persönlich könnte ich auf crossing_ref=zebra auch verzichten, aber das ist meines Wissens kein Konsens in der Community.

In dem verlinkten Wiki-Artikel finde ich deine Aussage so nicht. Tatsächlich wird dort als "akkuratester Weg" ein Zebrastreifen aufgeführt, der sowohl mit crossing:markings=zebra als auch crossing_ref=zebra getaggt ist! Oder verstehe ich dich hier falsch?

VG
burrscurr
Nakaner (2026-06-09 10:06:03+00:00): Hallo,

die "Saakepromenade" ist doch bestimmt nach dem Fluss benannt, oder? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1434436497#map=18/50.609851/11.649728

Viele Grüße

Michael
Thringr (2026-06-12 17:38:07+00:00): Ja, es ist die Saalepromenade. Es war leider ein Tippfehler.
michaelthehutt (2025-10-01 19:04:21+00:00): Normally the area that is marked as the 'building' will just follow the foot print of the building itself. It's okay for it to be detached from the road, it's not supposed to cover the entire property.

It looks otherwise okay to me!
Taylor Oberst (2025-10-01 19:24:04+00:00): thx for taking the time to check, it's my first addition, and after going thru the tutorial on how to map, I wasn't quite sure if I was doing it correctly.
AndyB_66 (2025-09-30 19:18:58+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
NeisBot (2025-09-30 18:46:39+00:00): Hi Чампли, welcome and thanks for your contribution!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

Based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Updated street names on ways: ул.Орала Палуана, ул.Баксайыс, ул.Серкула Алдабергенулы, ул.Адырбека Отебекова"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
AndyB_66 (2025-09-30 19:17:57+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
H@mlet (2025-09-30 20:17:47+00:00): Bonjour,
bienvenue sur OpenStreetMap.
Il y a dû y avoir un problème car la haie que vous avez modifiée (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/647519631) traverse maintenant le quartier, dont plusieurs maisons. :-)
Pensez à corriger dès que vous pourrez.
N'hésitez pas à demander (ici, par message ou sur forum.openstreetmap.fr) si vous avez besoin d'aide.
Cordialement.
rene78 (2025-10-01 12:10:43+00:00): Hi julNri,

ich habe die 2 geschlossenen Geschäfte wiederhergestellt und auf "disused:shop=xx" gesetzt. Falls mal wieder ein Ladengeschäft an dieser Stelle einzieht bleibt die Historie erhalten.

Viele Grüsse
René
julNri (2025-10-01 16:15:01+00:00): Hallo René,
es sieht aus, als das Gebäude abgerissen wird. Deshalb habe ich das Geschäft gelöscht. Ich lasse so, wie etwas neues erscheint.
Viele Grüße
Antoine
m@rio (2025-10-05 08:59:16+00:00): Cześć db-ak,
w tym zestawie zman oznaczyłeś jeden z odcinków drogi 196 (odcinek 114 na wyjeździe ze Sławy w kierunku Skoków) jako jednokierunkowy, przez co droga stała się 'nieprzejezdna' w kierunku na północ.
Proszę o weryfikację.
pzdr, m@rio
db-ak (2025-10-05 09:05:01+00:00): Hej, mój błąd. Poprawione możesz sprawdzić. Dzięki za czujność
m@rio (2025-10-05 12:18:02+00:00): Jest ok, dzięki! :)
rhhs (2025-10-01 05:12:48+00:00): Thanks for adding this and other businesses to the map! However we have a habit of adding addresses only to buildings, and not again on nodes within those buildings. So if you add a business in a building which already has an address, it's not necessary to add the address again.
donovaly (2025-10-01 22:48:44+00:00): I got this already as on almost every change I got this info. But it is not wrong to add the address explicitly. I am not stubborn, have my reasons to use the address. As a former business owner I know well how search engines work - they evaluate the node and it helps a lot if the node of the shop has the address.

I don't get why nobody takes my argument. So here again:
* what is wrong to add an address to a shop node?
* how is it assured that AI crawlers get the address when they found the node of a shop?
rhhs (2025-10-02 14:14:59+00:00): I'm not an IT specialist, but I understand that it's easy for software to derive the address of a business from the address of the building the node for it is in. That some software doesn't do this well is a fault of that software, not of OSM.
In Bulgaria the consensus is to add addresses to the building area. In other countries, the OSM community reached a consensus to add it to separate nodes that only have the address. The information for a business then contains only the info for that business but not the address, to prevent that if the business disappears and is deleted, the address is also deleted.
There is also a consensus that the address is added either to the building or to a node, not to both. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mapping_addresses_as_separate_nodes_or_by_adding_to_building_polygons
donovaly (2025-10-03 13:13:41+00:00): Can you please point me to the page where the Bulgarian community came to the consensus?

I think we have a misunderstanding: I don't change adresses of houses, only add shops and state it the shop nodes the complete address. This does not harm, but has the advantage that any web-crawler get the full info for a shop - and this is what not only shop owners but also users like me need. For example in OSMAnd~ I tap on a shop node and get all info. And there are many apps around offering info from OSM. If the shop later closes, the node can be deleted and that's it.
Fraxi (2025-10-03 15:09:55+00:00): Hi
on your question - "what is wrong to add an address to a shop node?" - my answer:
because there is no point whenever there are several shops located on a single building, to mark all them with address data, while we could simply add  the address data on the building polygon. Furthermore, you could review the map(and especially with Streetcomplete), and you will notice duplicate housenumbers on a single building. A close example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/297367776. Do you see "23" twice? It is ugly visually...