piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
snake21 (2023-12-27 04:20:17+00:00): The roads were misaligned, I was trying to fix that...the lane assignments were also incorrect as the express lanes are a new features here that were not fully accounted for
txemt (2023-12-27 04:33:02+00:00): I was referring more to the exit ramps, like https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/10782943 28 nodes can get the same job done as 54 nodes. 

The express lanes are being worked on from Sheridan St to the Palm Beach County line. I'm sure they're being worked on into Palm Beach Co, but I'm not up there enough to know.
snake21 (2023-12-27 04:41:27+00:00): How do you determine what the correct number of nodes is?
txemt (2023-12-27 04:54:32+00:00): As I said, why put 1 million nodes in if 20 will do the same job? It doesn’t have to be 100% accurate, as the end user isn’t seeing the SATIMG that we see to correct the map.
snake21 (2023-12-27 13:30:04+00:00): What is SATIMG?
txemt (2023-12-28 02:58:58+00:00): Satellite Imagery or SATelite IMaGe.
snake21 (2023-12-29 02:17:32+00:00): Sorry, that makes obvious sense now that you put it in writing. Of course. 

So do you not agree with the principles outlined here? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Map_curves_with_an_appropriate_number_of_nodes
txemt (2023-12-29 02:27:24+00:00): Map curves with an appropriate number of nodes
Use a reasonable number of nodes to map curves and other non-linear features. There's no hard or fast rule about how many nodes should be used to map curves – you need to use your own judgment – but there should be enough so that the change in heading between successive segments of a way is relatively small – that is, the angle between adjacent segments should be closer to 180° than to 0°. Therefore, sharp curves require many closely-spaced nodes, while broader curves can be mapped with fewer, widely-spaced nodes.

YES!!! If 20 will do, why spend the time and energy putting in 10x that amount?
Mike_citadin (2024-01-31 10:35:48+00:00): Bonjour Maxwell, merci pour ces modifications. Les bornes à compost du Grand Lyon sont organic et non déchets verts. 
La liste des déchets est affichée dessus: restes de repas, produits périmés, épluchures, os. Mais pas branchages tontes jardinage.
Une discussion entre contributeurs du Grand Lyon est sur le forum à ce sujet.

Bonne journée.
Mike_citadin (2024-01-31 10:36:28+00:00): J'ai corrigé
DanJones000 (2024-01-01 22:38:21+00:00): I was wondering why the location was changed and address removed. The location doesn't seem to be accurate anymore, at least based on what I can see from street level imagery.

If this business doesn't have a physical location, it probably shouldn't be in OSM. The goal of OSM is to map what's actually visible on the ground 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Map_what's_on_the_ground

If your goal is to simply advertise your business, but not actually to help people physically find your business location, OSM may be the wrong place, and you should consider deleting it.
LanovkarJ (2024-01-22 18:58:33+00:00): ta lanovka kolem střediska je odhaduju omyl, co?
Maroš Klempa (2024-01-31 06:58:46+00:00): Áno. Je to omyl. Neviem ako tá lanovka vznikla. V Openstreetmap je označená ako čiara, nemá žiadny typ. Nevieš náhodou prečo to tak je?
Dík.
philippec (2024-10-24 23:43:41+00:00): Dit is uniek in Belgie.
Misschien overlegt u het beter of het een goed idee is.
Antwerpen centrum heeft er geen.
Dus denkt nominatim dat het stadhuis op de linkeroever ligt.
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/linkeroever-in-antwerpen/120589/6
Hufkratzer (2023-12-26 23:16:12+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1234376125 sieht auf dem Luftbild aus wie ein Gebäude; das ist wahrscheinlich eine Reithalle (https://www.reitsportarena.ch/reitsportzentrum). Für Reithallen gibt's in iD neuerdings auch ein Preset "Reithalle".
Albert-P (2023-12-27 22:24:31+00:00): MoinMoin aus dem hohen Norden, 
ich danke dir sehr für deinen Kommentar, der natürlich völlig richtig ist. Es war ein Versehen, statt Reithalle den Reitplatz genommen zu haben. 
Ich wünsche dir ein gutes Neues Jahr!
Albert
Arturo Francisco Barbero (2024-01-11 19:14:38+00:00): Okey, i will improve it 👍
NeisBot (2024-01-13 12:37:49+00:00): Thanks for your response!

#HappyMapping
The_Nickname (2023-12-26 18:48:24+00:00): Kann der Wikidata-Tag einfach so ergänzt werden? Und wie taggt man ein Straßennamensschild bzw. die Plakette welche daran hängt?
The_Nickname (2023-12-26 18:56:31+00:00): name:etymology:wikidata und name:etymology:wikipedia nachgetaggt
Ropino (2024-05-02 17:00:42+00:00): Hi,
Ist "Offenes Klassenzimmer" wirklich ein place:locality?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:place%3Dlocality
TimonBd (2024-05-03 17:19:10+00:00): Hi,
das habe ich wohl falsch getaggt. 
danke für den Hinweis.
Frans S (2023-12-27 10:32:52+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. However, in 1 case you clustered 9 buildings together as 1 building.
This is a building only project. Please stick to that.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145546550
Hufkratzer (2023-12-26 22:09:18+00:00): Hi,
The riding arenas are usually tagged as pitches and not as tracks. In JOSM you can use the  preset for sport=equestrian to do that,
EBSerKartler (2024-06-25 17:03:33+00:00): Hallo Stephan,

in diesem Änderungssatz hast du u. a. die Relation: Zwei breite und sehr dichte Gehölzstreifen; südl von Atzenhof beidseitig der Mainstraße (16882456) angelegt. Die nördliche der beiden Flächen liegt genau auf dem Parkplatz der Firma Dauchenbeck. Ich war zwar kürzlich dort, habe aber nicht auf die Schilder "geschützter Landschaftsbestandteil", die es hier geben soll, geachtet. Bevor ich die nördliche Fläche jetzt selber lösche, frage ich dich erst mal...
Stephan van Helden (2024-06-28 07:53:31+00:00): Hi, entschuldige bitte die späte Antwort und danke für den Hinweis. Das LB ist tatsächlich in den offiziellen Daten vom LfU (BayernAtlas, Fin-Web usw.) falsch eingezeichnet (https://v.bayern.de/3r7Vn). Laut Änderungsverordnung liegt die Teilfläche auf Flurnr. 959/19; ich habe die Umrisse entsprechend korrigiert.
pyram (2024-09-27 14:05:26+00:00): Bezüglich der Namensgebung laut Wikipedia bitte
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4446508
lesen und entsprechend korrigieren.
Danke.
Stephan van Helden (2024-09-27 14:43:31+00:00): Hab ich gemacht, danke für den Hinweis hier (hätte die Notiz sonst nicht entdeckt).
hk51 (2023-12-27 12:19:14+00:00): Hallo,
die Straße ist vor Ort mit 2 Bindestrichen ausgeschildert, siehe auch hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3443926
balint36 (2023-12-29 12:09:12+00:00): A hidak útkategóriája miért lett mást, mint az odavezető úté?
A hidak miért kapták meg azt a nevet, hogy "Híd"?
Nagybátonyban miért állítgattad össze-vissza az útkategóriát?
balint36 (2023-12-29 12:11:18+00:00): Ózdi úti körforgalom miért ilyen?
Középen van kereszteződés?
A körforgalom közepén át lehet menni?
Filip009 (2023-12-30 10:05:09+00:00): zdravím, s akou presnosťou kreslíš tie plochy? Dávaš tam strašne veľa bodov. Napríklad tu https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1234431458 má cesta 68 bodov. Keď som v JOSM použil nástroj simplify geometry s maximom 0,5 metra, tak ostalo 27 bodov, čo je podľa mňa dosť presné. Prosím používaj tento nástroj, alebo kresli menej bodov, pokiaľ to nezameriavaš s metrovou presnosťou na mieste.
bobeeeze (2024-02-04 21:26:22+00:00): Bonjour, je vois que dans ce groupe de modif tu as mis plein d'arrêts de bus et de magasins de portes sur les collines environnantes de Besançon. Vue ton expérience je suppose que c'est un problème lié à Osmand ou une fausse manip. Dans tous les cas je te remercie de corriger ça et de vérifier si le problème vient vraiment d'Osmand. Salutations
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145548462
Robot8A (2023-12-26 20:48:11+00:00): También survey mobiliario urbano y puntos de interés en Zaragoza
Filip009 (2023-12-30 09:59:06+00:00): Použité tagovanie bolo označené za zastarané https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse=reservoir
parsewski (2024-12-18 11:07:56+00:00): Hallo Maverick12, in diesem Changeset sind auf einmal wieder zwei Ärzte drinnen, die schon seit jahren im Ruhestand sind. Außerdem tragst du da eine Pension namens "ZeitRaum"  neben einer Pension gleichen Namens ein und das kommt Dir nicht komisch vor? Es würd mich interessieren wie sowas passieren kann. Jedenfalls hab ich die drei Sachen gefixt, keine Ahnung, ob da noch was falsch ist.
Luzandro (2024-12-18 19:29:23+00:00): weiß nicht, ob es zumindest gelesen wird, auf eine Antwort würde ich aber nicht warten

https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=591863
parsewski (2024-12-18 23:43:04+00:00): Ja schade und ärgerlich.
PHerison (2023-12-27 13:47:36+00:00): For completeness: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3967020
Nakaner (2024-11-04 22:37:35+00:00): Hallo,

an mich wurde per E-Mail folgende Frage herangetragen, um deren Beantwortung ich bitte:

"Mich würde interessieren, woher die eingezeichneten Streckenverläufe stammen. Dies auch besonders aufgrund der Tatsache, dass bisher keine wirkliche planerische Leistung seitens des Lucie-Projektteams in diese Streckenverlängerung von Ludwigsburg über Neckargröningen bis nach Waiblingen geflossen ist."

Sollte ein Planfeststellungsantrag zeitlich noch nicht absehbar sein, gibt es keinen Grund, die Strecke in OSM zu erfassen.

Viele Grüße

Michael
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-12-31 17:10:52+00:00): parece que escreveu errado o site.
zstadler (2024-06-22 11:35:08+00:00): הי אילן,

תודה על המיפוי של המערה והשביל השחור.

האם גם השביל
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1234451535
שהוספת מסומן בשטח בשחור?
zstadler (2025-04-25 15:45:28+00:00): היי,
אשמח אם תוכל להגיב לשאלתי
Frans S (2023-12-30 10:21:28+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145550558
HellMap (2024-05-21 09:35:12+00:00): Sveiki!

Šis kompresors https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11457580338 drošvien ne tajā vietā trāpījies. Es nezinu, kur tieši tam bija jābūt, tāpēc nevaru pats izlabot neminot.

Paldies
westnordost (2024-01-05 12:38:03+00:00): Hola Linox 479,

(no soy hablante nativo, mi español  puede sonar extraño)

¡bienvenido a la comunidad OpenStreetMap!

Esto es un comentario a un conjunto de cambios. Otros usarios, como yo, pueden comentar a un cambio tuyo si por ejemplo tienen dudas o quieren apuntarte a un error que hayas cometido.

Dado que OpenStreetMap es una grad comunidad de voluntarios, es importante siempre escribir un breve resumen del conjunto de cambios cuando lo guardes para que otros pueden entender que hiciste.

En este conjunto de cambios lo hiciste, muy bien! Por favor, sigue así, ayudaría mucho a los voluntarious que revisan cambios de otros usarios (cual en general ya es un tarea ingrata).

Sin embargo, aprovecho este comentario para apuntarte a un error que cometiste. Usaste `leisure=sports_hall` ("Gimnasio / Pabellón deportivo") pero lo correcto sería `leisure=sports_centre` ("Complejo deportivo").

No te preocupes, ya lo he corregido.

Un saludo
westnordost

P.S: He escrito este comentario porque debido a los resumenes malos de tus cambios, los moderadores están sospechando vandalismo. Mira aquí: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/valid-mapping-in-mexico/107356
citrula (2023-12-27 01:09:59+00:00): BMX track (w792953269) is still present on esri world imagery from 2022. Is it gone now?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145551993
Dark_Valor (2023-12-27 04:14:27+00:00): I didn't realize that I was using a different view than Bing.  Once I switched to Bing, I was able to see BMX track and mapped it again.  Sorry about that
I can zoom again and see with detail.
felipeeugenio (2023-12-27 15:41:52+00:00): Hola. Ya no existe la revisión técnica en Temuco? estuve ahí en el verano.
la transformó en un estacionamiento por completo. saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145552027
One_Jose16 (2023-12-27 18:02:22+00:00): Yo anduve la semana pasada. Al parecer pase a cambiarla al revisar el amenity y agregar la de Lautaro. lo corregiré, gracias
tastrax (2023-12-27 00:46:34+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features 

To get the + symbol on a mobile device numeric keypad I reckon you will need to do a LONG press on the zero.
I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
tyfi (2023-12-26 23:09:25+00:00): I also removed a way segment adjacent to the eastern terminus of P that was untouched since TIGER and was not found in aerial imagery.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-12-26 23:20:27+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Podana kombinacja addr:city + addr:place jest nieprawidłowa.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/183062853

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/185533089

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
trigpoint (2023-12-27 14:19:58+00:00): Hi
Please make changeset comments clear and informative to make it clear to local  mappers what you are changing and why.
Relations such a "Strategic Road Network" do not belong in OSM, please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations_are_not_categories

Also A458(T)  (England) is not a name so doesn't belong in the name tag, A558 is a ref. Where did you source it from? (T) looks very antiquated and data consumers can derived from highway=trunk.

Cheers Phil
citrula (2023-12-27 01:14:48+00:00): Welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contributions! This edit looks good, except for one thing - footway ways should be connected to the adjacent road when sidewalks are not separately mapped. This is so pedestrian routing works better. Later, if you want to map the sidewalks sesparately you can disconnect it from the road and attach to the sidewalk. Happy to answer any questions you may have!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145552504
jmarchon (2023-12-27 00:57:50+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145553937
jmarchon (2023-12-27 00:58:00+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145553944
jmarchon (2023-12-27 00:58:10+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145553948
jmarchon (2023-12-27 00:58:20+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145553949
Fizzie-DWG (2023-12-27 03:14:35+00:00): Hello HaBaSm. Is there any particular reason for mapping the Police Station as several different buildings, rather than just 1?
HaBaSm (2023-12-27 11:42:14+00:00): Not particularly, it was what it was like previously but it was way offset and it didn't like me moving it so I just remapped it like how it had been done
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-06 11:27:08+00:00): name=VM flowermart
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11458263851

shop=thiruvananthapuram ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop or https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Tag_descriptions_for_key_%22shop%22 fitting? Maybe new value needs to be invented? Maybe this data is wrong and there is no shop here? Maybe it is not a shop but something else?
iMacThere4iAm (2025-06-04 13:21:58+00:00): What is the source for the name "Pont Twym" and not "Pond Twym"? Growing up in the area I always heard it called Pond Twym, although a google search shows references to both spellings. 
Also, the correct OSM key would be not:name, not not_name
ceirios (2025-06-04 15:45:09+00:00): Hi there, I live locally and I grew up with my parents calling it Pont Twym (with a T), not once have I heard it being Pond (with a D) personally but I can also see it being used. 

Thanks for the note about the OSM key - I can fix that when I get home. I always get that mixed up
ceirios (2025-06-04 21:34:28+00:00): Should be fixed now - I added "Pond Twym" as an alt name since I do agree with you.

Perhaps there used to be a bridge here, as this would be where the "Pont" would come from. I've never heard it be called any kind of llyn/pwll/etc either
OddlyAngled (2023-12-27 18:26:17+00:00): thanks! don’t usually map on my phone, must have messed something up 😅
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145554986
b-jazz (2023-12-27 20:07:08+00:00): No worries. It happens all the time. Probably some subtle bug in the editor you're using.
tastrax (2023-12-28 00:03:49+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features 

To get the + symbol on a mobile device numeric keypad I reckon you will need to do a LONG press on the zero.
I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
Fizzie-DWG (2023-12-30 04:38:37+00:00): This shop has no name listed, & neither the listed website or phone number are found by search? Are you sure it's there?
Fizzie-DWG (2023-12-30 04:39:27+00:00): Found it via https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4041929 which also doesn't give a name?
Fizzie-DWG (2023-12-27 03:07:19+00:00): Hello Gataris. Welcome to OSM but something we have o point out. If you're mapping a building, please only map the building itself, not the block of land that it's sitting on! Any questions, please ask! Thanks
literan (2024-02-22 13:25:30+00:00): You've broken water multipolygon with this edit. 

I fixed it: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147773560
citrula (2023-12-27 03:20:31+00:00): Nice fix! Thanks !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145555530
nickswalker (2023-12-27 05:27:09+00:00): Thank you for the help!
CNeal (2023-12-30 20:46:13+00:00): On-street bicycle lanes should be tagged as a feature on the roadway, rather than mapped with additional line features. See:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cycleway%3Dlane
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145556152
assanges (2023-12-27 03:34:22+00:00): For image reference, see the FB page  "Transport × Shulin":
若需圖片參考佐証，請至 FB 專頁 「交通×樹林」：
https://www.facebook.com/transportshulin/posts/pfbid0epytmgseHkdh4M1vuLh2wWJK3842XHajJpGjhgGtyQ74DpMKxeiq8SMS5xG3v6Yzl
hoserab (2023-12-27 04:33:59+00:00): This seems perfectly well-reasoned to me, along with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145557069. Langdon is the most populous hamlet in Alberta (not counting the "special" administrations at Sherwood Park and Fort McMurray), so it stands to reason it's going to be the most awkward edge case for `place=hamlet`. As long as this area doesn't become an inner boundary for Rocky View County (i.e. as Irricana, Beiseker, Cochrane, Crossfield and Airdrie are), because no matter what we tag Langdon it's still part of RVC, it seems fine to me! :)
arjunaraoc (2023-12-28 01:35:38+00:00): Hello bhosalesagar005, 
Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
Please check my update vide https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145598543  From the satellite images, I found the building as still in construction and updated the tags. You can update the status if it is different. 
Happy Mapping!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145556630
jmarchon (2023-12-27 06:09:45+00:00): Welcome back to OSM!
i2004 (2023-12-27 21:51:35+00:00): te agrege mas paradas del 60 en tigre me la ordenas cuando puedas
Jarek 🚲 (2023-12-27 04:34:33+00:00): Ack, this changeset message should have mentioned Jane Street, not Keele Street - sorry
yawfle (2023-12-27 22:44:25+00:00): Hi! RE: parking lots, please read this:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=parking

I restored the service road you deleted; in general, it's better not to delete things unless you fully understand why it was there in the first place (which usually involves doing some reading on the wiki). Cheers!
mavl (2023-12-27 13:25:17+00:00): Здравствуйте. Напишите, пожалуйста, почему вы удалили дорогу?
mavl (2023-12-29 13:19:52+00:00): Здравствуйте. Я восстановил удалённую дорогу, так как получается, что нет причин её удалять.
mavl (2023-12-27 13:37:54+00:00): Здравствуйте. Это пакет правок отменён. Эти дороги стихийные и они ближе к track, чем к service. К домикам у моста обычно ходят по железной дороге.
felipeeugenio (2023-12-27 07:50:34+00:00): Hola. Qué significan estos nombres?
Saludos
felipeeugenio (2023-12-29 11:11:00+00:00): Hola. Necesitamos saber el origen y razón de estos nombres para así poder revisar bien si acaso los tags que está usando son los correctos. Por favor responder a las dudas. gracias
Alan Rivera (2023-12-29 21:21:20+00:00): Hola. En el 6° sector de gomez carreño, los conjuntos de casas tienen separación por letras.
Puede verificarlo en street view.
Considero útil esta información porque la gente que no vive en gomez carreño se confunde, incluso los delivery.
felipeeugenio (2023-12-30 20:34:50+00:00): ok, gracias, pero por favor no usar SV como fuente. por favor comprender la naturaleza del proyecto y sus restricciones de copyright.
saludos
lololailo (2023-12-27 13:34:08+00:00): Gracias por tus correcciones, siempre se me va alguna cota.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145560886
aTarom (2023-12-27 16:52:04+00:00): No hay de qué, es totalmente normal, seguro que yo también hubiese puesto un 8 en vez del 6 =D tuve que mirarlo en la otra escala del ráster con menos zoom para asegurarme
Kirstukas (2023-12-27 20:41:53+00:00): Klausimas, kodėl netinka nuovažos kaip track? Ir vizualiai geriau atrodo, ir labiau atitinka klasifikavimą, kadangi nemažai nuovažų jungiasi į esamus track kelius. Taip pat pastebėjau vieną be realios priežasties ištrintą kelią, kuris yra statomas kartu su projektu.