piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NorthCrab_upload (2024-05-21 17:00:28+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11922785237

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
jtracey (2024-05-21 20:46:13+00:00): Thanks for the edits! Going forward, it's helpful if you provide a changeset summary, to help other editors in the area get a quick idea of what's going on.
user_21471978 (2024-06-11 12:52:29+00:00): Sorry about that, I've been adding more useful summaries.
woodpeck (2024-05-21 17:24:25+00:00): Hello there, in this changeset you have added over one hundred mini grass areas using something like 8000 nodes in total. Please don't do that; grass areas of just a few square metres are not of interest to OSM and larger areas should be modeled as one large area, not dozens of smaller ones. Also, don't place a source tag on every single object, the source tag on the changeset itself is sufficient.
joost schouppe (2024-05-22 07:38:03+00:00): Bedankt voor de verfijning, Philippe. De index is omdat ik aan het knoeien was MapComplete foto's - op een of andere manier waren mijn eerste twee foto's gekanteld: https://imgur.com/defibrillator-RcITXjn
Glassman (2024-05-22 16:50:15+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151638746
Azharul Islam Anik (2024-05-28 17:15:19+00:00): Lots of modification. Some of them couldn't be found in the street-level imagery. Need to fix the buildings. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151638754
woodpeck (2024-05-21 17:27:52+00:00): Hello, in this changeset you have added just 6 structures which claim to be parking garages but most of them use over 200 nodes. Please remember that OSM's precision is only +/-10cm anyway so there's no need to add that level of detail. Also, these structures are not visible on ESRI imagery which leaves your claimed source of "field survey"; may I inquire just how you conducted a field survey here that ended up in such precision? Is it possible that you are copying from building plans?
NeisBot (2024-05-21 17:20:03+00:00): Hi Vgerbud, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature's:
https://osm.org/node/11922827116
https://osm.org/node/11922827115

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
literan (2024-05-21 17:59:25+00:00): будешь рисовать фейковые пляжи - получишь блок
Azharul Islam Anik (2024-05-28 17:13:20+00:00): Need to modify the building polygon. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151639268
Frans S (2024-05-22 09:18:26+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. However, map buildings with courtyards more accurate and don't include them.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151639433
NeisBot (2024-05-21 17:35:03+00:00): Hi gotchhhhh, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature's:
https://osm.org/way/1285269702
https://osm.org/way/1285269701

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-21 18:36:07+00:00): Partly reverted/corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/151640304

However, please stop adding so many fake #pokemon map elements!
bruno-fr (2025-06-23 22:59:56+00:00): Bonjour @Lisapple,

Je ne comprends pas bien l'ajout du noeud "Porte Vauban (11922864880)" en tant que historic=city_gate.

Sur place, je ne vois rien qui ressemble à des portes de villes. Peut-être était-ce l'emplacement avant même notre naissance ?
Dans le cas, ce nœud a-t-il vraiment sa place sur une carte supposée représenter le présent ?

Cordialement.
Lisapple (2025-06-24 14:50:45+00:00): Bonjour Bruno.
En effet, c'est une erreur de ma part. J'ai du confondre la traduction dans StreetComplete "Porte de la Ville" avec l'entrée historique ("Porte").
Le nom est certainement bon mais c'est effectivement le dénomination du lieu (ex. : "place=neighbourhood") et non une quelconque construction.
Je ne suis pas passé récemment à proximité, je préfère donc pas apporter de modification pour éviter une autre erreur.
Lisapple (2025-07-27 16:54:35+00:00): Je me souviens que "Porte Vauban" n'apparaît que sur le panneau indiquant l'entrée du centre-ville (qui apparaît en haut de https://panoramax.openstreetmap.fr/?s=p3d24cfcc-504e-4348-bb84-8798fc02ea26 malheureusement l'image est tronquée).
C'est donc peut-être le véritable/nouveau nom de "Porte Martrou" (node/10585119772), qui alors se situerait du côté du Pont du Martrou/Transbordeur.
pyrog (2026-07-23 09:24:38+00:00): Cette photo ?
https://panoramax.openstreetmap.fr/?pic=0a227a2f-a125-49ac-8ced-6cf8775c252a
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-10-25 02:45:53+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/183014517/history has access:bicycle = yes that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
Would using bicycle access tag (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bicycle ) be fitting at least equally well?

Usage statistics are sometimes wrong and should not be blindly followed, but are worth looking at - see http://taghistory.raifer.tech/#***/bicycle/&***/access%3Abicycle/
TrickyFoxy (2024-05-27 18:48:09+00:00): Откуда информация?
TrickyFoxy (2025-01-18 00:24:27+00:00): Ответа нет, выглядит неправдоподобно. Откат
Intrinsical (2024-05-21 17:45:21+00:00): also added a stream from personal geotagged imagery
NeisBot (2024-05-21 17:50:24+00:00): Hi Daredroses, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature's:
https://osm.org/way/37916622
https://osm.org/way/37916621

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-21 18:20:28+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/151642007
Daredroses (2024-05-21 23:41:21+00:00): Honestly, this is for Pokemon Go.  Since Tucson doesn't have a beach. This a location where many pokemon go players gather. Just wanted a beach location for fellow players.
silversurfer83 (2024-05-21 18:53:03+00:00): Hi there :)

it looks like you left the opening hours of the bike shop with the beverage shop. Maybe check that out

happy mapping
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151640692
osmguy0815 (2024-05-21 21:57:10+00:00): Thanks, fixed it already :)
dpolovinkin (2024-05-27 03:20:31+00:00): hi, please take a look
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
dpolovinkin (2024-05-27 03:23:14+00:00): strange that you have 20k+ changesets but leave comments which give 0 info on what was changed, just noticed and wanted to put attention to that :))
dpolovinkin (2024-06-11 23:20:31+00:00): will you answer? I see you making commits but still the same meaningless comments...
NeisBot (2024-05-21 17:55:03+00:00): Hi Daredroses, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1058237279

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-21 18:19:31+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/151641969
NeisBot (2024-05-21 18:00:19+00:00): Hi gotchhhhh, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1285277923

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-21 18:22:37+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/151641521
nevw (2024-05-21 23:12:02+00:00): Hi robbie420, please only map real things on the osm. I have deleted your edits.
Azharul Islam Anik (2024-05-28 17:12:24+00:00): Thanks for your contribution. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151641207
mcliquid (2024-05-21 18:39:04+00:00): this was not intended. it seems that JOSM has re-uploaded changes that have already been uploaded. The part in Munich was already uploaded at 20:01, the changes in the Azores only at 20:34. I restart and then check whether something has been created twice.
mcliquid (2024-05-21 18:43:51+00:00): No OSM data has been created twice. JOSM really seems to have combined two different changesets. There is no other explanation for the different times. I'm really sorry about that.
Tatti Barletta (2024-05-23 07:28:46+00:00): In case you are still wondering, maybe you unticked the "Close changeset after upload" in JOSM upload dialog on the first upload. The things you never noticed are there until you toggle them by accident :)
marc__marc (2024-09-17 21:53:02+00:00): Bonjour Julien,
j'ai changé check_date:survey en survey:date :)
Cordialement,
Marc
surveyor54 (2024-05-22 07:40:48+00:00): Tactile_paving is still  available, why was it deleted? 🤔
halloschorle (2024-05-23 14:21:14+00:00): Hi,

Why has the Changeset have to be so big? Did something wrong or mistake? 

Normally Changesets should be local.
thetornado76 (2024-05-23 14:29:27+00:00): The changeset should of course not be that big. I'm afraid I forgot to upload it in between.
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-21 18:23:23+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/151641547
marc__marc (2024-08-29 16:23:32+00:00): Hello,
can you please take care of validators warning/errors ? this changeset upload a lot of orphan nodes, duplicate of other nodes, for ex https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11922998972 duplicated of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11923000582
Thanks,
Marc
seichter (2024-08-29 17:03:37+00:00): I'm mapping since 2008 and I do take care of JOSM-Inspector warnings.
I can't reconstruct what happened at that time. Maybe a "broken" upload that completed after I uploaded a clean one.
marc__marc (2024-08-29 21:08:33+00:00): Strange. thanks for your feedback
eggie (2024-05-21 19:00:47+00:00): Welkom bij OSM

De info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode.
craft=photographer toegevoegd.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-05-21 19:31:20+00:00): Zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:craft%3Dphotographer

shop = photo is eigenlijk voor een winkel  Veredr kennen we https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dphoto_studio
Dat geeft ook een symbool.
Glassman (2024-05-22 16:54:02+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.

One recommendation - don't connect landuse to roads or buildings. If something changes in the future it make is more difficult to update.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151642078
NorthCrab_upload (2024-05-21 18:30:19+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/839886276

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-11-04 16:23:10+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/238488781/history - shy you changed shop=yes to shop=1 ?
Glassman (2024-05-22 16:54:31+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151642166
Glassman (2024-05-22 16:58:57+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151642166
Glassman (2024-05-22 16:57:07+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151642295
Glassman (2024-05-22 16:58:48+00:00): Roads are added as ways on polygons. (Technically, roads can be added as polygons but then routing and other such features won't work.) Also, we don't really have living streets in the US. I changed it to a service road.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151642295
Glassman (2024-05-22 17:00:22+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151642370
Glassman (2024-05-22 17:00:34+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151642431
Glassman (2024-05-22 17:00:51+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151642512
Glassman (2024-05-22 17:01:26+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151642557
NeisBot (2024-05-21 18:45:03+00:00): Hi Daredroses, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1285295881

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
WoodWoseWulf (2024-05-21 20:49:51+00:00): Hello Daredroses,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Pokemon GO uses old map data from over a year ago for biomes. Adding a beach now will have no impact on the game.

Please stop adding fake features to the map as they will be removed.
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-22 04:16:57+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/151647552
Glassman (2024-05-22 17:02:41+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151642688
NorthCrab_upload (2024-05-21 18:50:27+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/839886276

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eggie (2024-05-21 19:36:05+00:00): Dag Timon,
Mooi zo'n Trail, maar tijdelijke evenementen voegen we eigenlijk niet toe in OSM. Het wordt toch ook niet uitgevoerd hier? 


MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-05-21 19:41:58+00:00): Het tijdelijk evenement heb ik verwijderd.
MVG
eggie
maasa123 (2024-05-23 11:12:52+00:00): Hej! 

Varför gjorde du en revert på min CS med bussgator? Om det var problem med min CS hade du kunnat ta en diskussion i den.

Access = no är fortfarande fel då det är tillåtet att cykla på bussfiler.
riiga (2024-05-23 11:27:16+00:00): Hej!

Jag missade att du hade rättat till cykelåtkomsten och trodde att du bara slentriantmässigt hade ändrat vägarna till highway=busway, därav revert. Du har rätt i att bicycle=yes borde läggas till, och även så borde mofa=yes (moped klass II) läggas till.

Jag rättar min backning senare idag när jag har tillgång till rätt verktyg.
maasa123 (2024-05-23 11:39:29+00:00): Ok, bra!

Är highway=busway felaktigt? Eller varför ska inte den användas?
riiga (2024-05-23 18:18:32+00:00): Den kan användas, det finns inga förbjuda taggar i OSM. Däremot är det en ganska ny tagg som inte stöds på t.ex. standardkartan på webben och alla är inte överens om hur den ska användas (t.ex. vad krävs för att det ska vara en bussgata?).
archie (2024-05-23 19:49:21+00:00): Försök att undvika att använda busway. De visas inte (ingenting!) på carto. Och användningen av denna tag är rätt begränsad  (https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1LWA). Det fanns en diskussionstråd på forumet för en tid sedan, där det framgick att arbetet med att göra busway "synlig" på carto inte var prioriterat. Routningen av bussträckor påverkas i sig inte av att busway inte syns, men resultatet med icke-synlig sträcka i detta fall är inte tilltalande för den som letar efter bussförbindelser med hjälp av osm.
maasa123 (2024-05-23 20:12:20+00:00): Är inte det ni nämner just Tagging for the renderer? Min naiva tanke är att Busway finns i ID och då borde vara "rätt" tagg att använda för just bussgator/bussfiler. 
Användning ökar ju inte heller om den inte går att införa då det blir omedelbar revert på dem.
riiga (2024-05-23 20:17:36+00:00): "Tagging for the renderer" är när man felaktigt taggar saker för att få dem att synas på kartan. Vägarna som finns nu är helt korrekta enligt konstens alla regler, förutom att vissa anser att man borde använda highway=busway istället.
literan (2024-05-22 20:48:31+00:00): 1) дома надо отрисовывать по "подошве", а не по крыше

2) нельзя рисовать дома поверх заборов, дорог и прочих линейных объектов. Вы когда-нибудь видели такое наяву? это вандализм
NikitaBel (2024-05-23 13:04:37+00:00): В каком месте мною был отрисован контур дома "поверх забора"? О каком вандализме идет речь?
literan (2024-05-23 16:52:56+00:00): В данном месте: https://osm.org/go/0t3LnWek7?m=

Сейчас здесь все нормально, потому что я исправил ваш брак.

Вандализм это рисовать здания поверх заборов, не задумываясь о том, что заборы проходят рядом со зданием или упираются в него, а не пересекают его насквозь.
NeisBot (2024-05-21 19:25:03+00:00): Hi EggsInTheMorning, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1285326326

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
EggsInTheMorning (2024-05-21 20:03:23+00:00): The beach is a sand entrance to the reservoir created from erosion. This sandy area is where locals fish swim and camp, while most other areas on this reservoir are surrounded by trees. With local knowledge and using the aerial imagery I marked out a small area that some would consider the beach of the reservoir.
Kookykooky (2024-05-22 06:14:36+00:00): Fine, I just don't think it's important to have a parking lot somewhere in the closed school grounds without a driveway. Who will use it?
Bienson (2024-06-18 03:59:56+00:00): Quite a lot of people as you can see in the aerial images.
Kookykooky (2024-06-18 05:54:49+00:00): in that case, there is no marked driveway, I guess that the users of the parking lot can't fly :)
WoodWoseWulf (2024-05-21 21:36:40+00:00): Olá, gotchhhhh

Parece que você está adicionando muitos recursos estranhos aqui (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1284271780). Você pode explicar sua fonte e o que está tentando mapear?

Hi gotchhhhh

You seem to be adding a lot of strange features here (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1284271780) can you please explain your source and what you're trying to map?
Nzau (2025-05-04 09:11:09+00:00): Bonjour pel24,

Pour information je vais faire quelques modifs sur La Roche-sur-Yon. 

En effet, tu as cartographié des bandes cyclables en pistes cyclables. Pour les bandes cyclables, il faut ajouter les informations dans les attributs de la voirie.

La différence entre les deux : la piste cyclable est physiquement séparée de la chaussée, tandis que la bande cyclable est uniquement représentée par de la peinture au sol.

Le wiki : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bicycle
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:cycleway

Au plaisir d'en discuter,
Bonne contribution,
Nzau
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-05-27 02:52:11+00:00): Whats the source?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151644758
MNXANL (2024-05-28 05:52:32+00:00): Hi: the edits are based on satellite map from https://map.tianditu.gov.cn/2020/
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151644758
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-05-28 08:14:05+00:00): Thank you
Wow that is a big project.
Do you add it to custom layers? 
What is the license of that source?