piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_5359 (2023-09-08 06:30:43+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note thatn OSM classification of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
Glassman (2023-09-10 18:19:11+00:00): #TIP: Somethimes it just the aerial imagery is offset. You can adjust the offset background icon layer on the right side of the editor.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140956982
bxl-forever (2023-09-07 20:30:49+00:00): The rooftop bar is already on the map.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11005511496

Your edit has been reverted.

Please make sure to always check against current data.  Be aware that most Organic Maps install use cached map data that is not always up to date.
Filip009 (2026-04-24 09:28:37+00:00): Ahoj, blokuje to tu routovanie https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/869731091. Myslíš, že by to tam malo byť? Aj my sme tam išli v protismere :D
Dodko (2026-04-24 09:40:39+00:00): asi na tej spojke nieje značka tak by potom nemala byť jednosmerka
ovruni (2023-09-08 00:47:15+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Directrices_de_edici%C3%B3n_organizada
JesusRicardoT (2023-09-08 10:57:43+00:00): Thank you for instructing me, it would be a favor to me if you could eliminate this apple and consider the new batches, with their respective observations.
ovruni (2023-09-09 00:26:59+00:00): Hola, me tomare un tiempo para escribir los errores (una vez mas) que se generan de manera recurrente en esta zona (posiblemente por alumnos de la misma persona, la cual parece tampoco tiene idea de conoce se hace el mapeo y hasta ahora no intentado contactar con la comunidad de OSM Perú).
Solo se tienen que agregar objetos sobre el terreno, no usos de suelo para acuicultura.
El uso de la etiqueta de edificio se encuentra destinado UNICAMENTE a edificios, no a lotes, sin embargo en algunos casos puede coincidir si el dueño ha construido en todo su lote, en caso contrario se tiene que dejar en blanco la parte que no es edificio. Por otra parte, para etiquetar la manzana a la que pertenece un edificio se puede usar la etiqueta "addr:block" y para etiquetar el lote se puede utilizar la etiqueta "addr:plot". El resto de etiquetas como "addr:city" van para ciudad, "addr:state" el departamento (no el distrito, para esto puede utilizar addr:district). Para ediciones organizadas se tienen que seguir la guía para este fin. [0]  Finamente para cualquier consulta sobre el mapeo de OSM en Perú y detalles sobre lo comentado lineas arriba tenemos el canal de telegram en https://t.me/osmPe (Por favor indíquele esto  ultimo también al profesor encargado) 
Saludos 
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Directrices_de_edici%C3%B3n_organizada
mavl (2024-11-13 09:20:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159082288 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible sources - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16857].
citrula (2023-09-07 22:05:19+00:00): Hi, please don't add foot=no unless it is illegal to walk on the road AND no sidewalk is present. You can instead add an appropriate sidewalk tag to the road (in this case it would be sidewalk:right=separate)
sisiroe (2023-09-07 22:23:16+00:00): Except that the sidewalk is far enough from the road that it constitutes as illegal to walk in the street. Technically, no sidewalk is present at streetside.
citrula (2023-09-07 22:31:27+00:00): Where is the requirement that sidewalks are "present at streetside?" How far away do you consider acceptable for sidewalks?
citrula (2023-09-07 22:42:44+00:00): Adding incorrect access tags damages the map and makes pedestrian routing worse. Please refer to the wiki to see how to tag separate sidewalks correctly: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sidewalk#Separately_mapped_sidewalks
Branko Kokanovic (2023-09-18 21:36:34+00:00): Hi, you seemed to delete settlement Siget in Serbia. It is tagged as "relation" and you put some tags to way. We like to keep relations with internal references ("ref:RS:naselje") as separate objects from ways. I fixed it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141443033, but please watch out. Thanks!
Kai Johnson (2023-11-15 15:31:52+00:00): Please don't put descriptions in the name=* tag. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Names#Les_noms_ne_sont_pas_des_descriptions
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140959004
Kai Johnson (2023-11-15 15:33:36+00:00): It would be good if you could square up your buildings. Also, please make sure your changeset comments explain what you edited. Thanks! / Ce serait bien si vous pouviez aligner vos bâtiments. Assurez-vous également que vos commentaires sur le changeset expliquent ce que vous avez modifié. Merci!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140959131
Kai Johnson (2023-11-15 15:40:28+00:00): The coastline elements in this atoll are members of relations 6063020, 6063056, 1862499, 16665418. Mapping the new coastline is good, but it should be added to all the local relations. / Les éléments du littoral de cet atoll sont membres des relations 6063020, 6063056, 1862499, 16665418. Cartographier le nouveau littoral, c'est bien, mais il faudrait l'ajouter à toutes les relations locales.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140959786
Hb- (2025-07-25 12:25:25+00:00): The tunnel https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1205984966 is drawn here from the three tunnel junction point (elevation >1255 m) to an inlet Grande Eau river at Pont de la Tine (elevation ~820 m). But this misses out either the Sepey inlet at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13021876218 and the power house at Pont de la Tine https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/694831722
Is there really a connection to the headrace for La Farettes without running the water through the Pont de la Tine generators?
InfosReseaux (2025-07-25 14:35:19+00:00): Hello

Thank you for noticing it and the tunnel between La Tine and Hongrin tunnel was erroneous. I've deleted it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169458378
I surely had mistaken offocial map.
This confirms there is no such tunnel: https://www.fmhl.ch/fileadmin/_processed_/d/5/csm_FMHL_Prise_d_eaux_5ed286c652.jpg

Best regards
SomeoneElse (2023-09-09 11:50:50+00:00): Hello,
You've changed the tagging on https://osm.mapki.com/history/relation/6859714 to "place=locality;islet".  I'd probably just go with one of those, and tag another way around the edge if you need to tag the other as well, as nothing will understand the semicolon in the data.  "place=locality" tends to be used on townlands of course, so maybe there needs to be one thing in OSM that carries the "natural" tags (place=islet; natural=wood" and one that carries the admin ones "place=locality; admin_level=10".
SomeoneElse (2023-09-09 11:52:00+00:00): Same comment as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140959903 applies to -6859710 | Swallow Island and -6859709 | Orchard Island here, too.
klik (2023-09-08 08:02:25+00:00): Hallo Buddor,
Du hast dem Spielfeld im Melsunger Waldstadion den Name Waldstadion gegeben. Bist Du sicher, dass nur das Spielfeld so heißt, oder wie schon vorher benannt das gesamte Areal?
meg_map (2023-09-08 08:06:52+00:00): Hi,
das Areal heißt so. Hatte ich gemacht, da in Vespucci bemängelt wurde, dass ein Name fehlt. Aber stimmt, ist nicht nötig.
Javierpf (2023-09-08 12:06:52+00:00): Hello! Thank you for the updates. It seems your changeset crosses many continents/countries. Please retain your changeset smaller. Let reviewers and other mappers check your edit more easily. It's impossible (almost) to keep track of the database and changes if changes in huge areas.
So I kindly ask you when you edit, retain your changeset in a particular smaller area -such as countries/provinces/municipality- save it first and then move to another area. Examples:
you are adding/modifying 10 objects in 2 distant cities => make 2 changesets, 1 per city.
you are adding/modifying 5 objects in 5 countries => make 5 changesets, 1 per country.
You'll find more information on the reason in this article: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
Taya_S (2023-09-08 12:32:05+00:00): That would be a pretty bad idea. Splitting this up per country would only spam the entire globe with hundreds of changesets, some of which would be almost as large as this bbox.
Friendly_Ghost (2023-09-08 13:02:43+00:00): @Javierpf No. 

I tried this and people still complain about country-sized or state-sized bboxes, except then they have 200 changesets to complain about. I hope we can all agree that that is pointless. 

This changeset is thematically very simple, so that should simplify the process of reviewing it.
DrSegatron (2023-09-09 00:47:18+00:00): I think these kinds of changesets SHOULD span the entire map because it is a major and global change.
mariotomo (2023-09-09 06:54:43+00:00): in general, I would agree with Javierpf (please keep your changesets local), but this is a clearly described thematic global correction. In my opinion the author did here the right thing.
SomeoneElse (2023-09-13 07:58:32+00:00): See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/culverts-with-level-1/103459/15 for more info
pantufla (2026-05-11 01:19:15+00:00): Hola Alberto, cuál es la razón para ponerle estrellas a una hamburguesería? referencia: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11175633854/history
felipeeugenio (2023-09-08 11:14:16+00:00): Hola Cristián. Estás en el chat de la comunidad?
ese sendero que dibujaste no tiene esa forma.
Como sé? por las trazas strava que dejan los senderistas.
Para explicarte como usarlas necesito que sea en el chat, es fácil, pero por este medio resulta imposible. por favor contactame en el chat de Telegram (https://t.me/OSMcl)

saludos
IguanaPablo (2023-09-12 18:41:50+00:00): Correction: Source used was Esri World Imagery; Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta.
IguanaPablo (2023-09-12 18:42:09+00:00): Correction: Source used was Esri World Imagery; Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta.
maraf24 (2023-09-08 21:52:13+00:00): Hi
The edit area is the whole world.
How can I check if you changed something in my country? Or in my town?
Friendly_Ghost (2023-09-09 13:38:33+00:00): You can use this Overpass query: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1A1e

Or use Achavi if you're specifically interested in this changeset: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=140962068
harahu (2023-09-12 20:05:11+00:00): Probably a good idea to break up your changesets a bit more, perhaps do it country by country. Seeing these big bounding boxes is annoying for everyone.
Friendly_Ghost (2023-09-13 05:27:21+00:00): No. I tried this and people still complain about country-sized or state-sized bboxes, except then they have 200 changesets to complain about. I hope we can all agree that that is pointless.
SomeoneElse (2023-09-13 07:59:39+00:00): See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/culverts-with-level-1/103459/15 for more info
Friendly_Ghost (2023-09-13 09:02:39+00:00): Thank you, @SomeoneElse. I forgot to link to the discussion in this changeset.
Mammi71 (2023-10-31 22:32:59+00:00): Hallo welzheimerwald,
nochmal ich ...
Meines Wissens sind das ALKIS und das LGL in BaWü keine zulässigen Quellen für OSM, da die Datenbanklizenzen nicht kompatibel sind. Schipft sich zwar OpenData, aber die Namensnennung kann nicht in der georderten Form erfolgen, eineausdrückliche Genehmigung, dies nur im ChangeSet anzugeben, liegt von der LGL nicht vor.,die gab es nur für Maps4BW, das jedoch abgeschaltet wurde. Also bitte keineDaten von der LG übernehmen. Danke
welzheimerwald (2023-12-05 21:26:55+00:00): Ja, haben schon ein paar Kollegen hier ebenfalls geschrieben, werd in Zukunft die Quellen sorgfältiger prüfen.
bradrh (2023-09-08 23:33:15+00:00): Plz confine your changesets to a smaller area & provide a more descriptive changeset comment.  What was 'fixed with Osmose'?
mapman44 (2023-09-09 01:14:57+00:00): Sorry about that. Will do.

https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/
mapman44 (2023-09-09 02:03:22+00:00): FWIW, Osmose can detect well over 200 types of errors, and it fixed quite a variety of them during my changesets. I'm not going to list all of them but most fixed deprecated or unnecessary tags. Very few (if any) were in your editing area so it's unlikely anything was changed that would affect your edits.
DD1GJ (2023-09-09 15:06:28+00:00): Hallo welzheimerwald,

In Baden-Württemberg gibt es derzeit leine legale Möglichkeit, amtliche Daten des LGL nach OSM zu übernehmen. Anhand Deines Änderungssatzkommentares und des Straßenbelag-Fixme gehe ich davon aus, dass Du nicht selbst vor Ort warst.

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/maps4bw-und-basemap-de/6762

Das Thema wurde bereits im Forum diskutiert. Verstöße gegen die inkompatiblen Nutzungsbedingungen schaden OSM.

Viele Grüße, Joachim
streckenkundler (2023-09-09 20:44:22+00:00): Guten Abend,

@ DD1GJ ...dann  melde ich ob der Verarbeitungswege auch hier leider meine Zweifel an: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140912750

fragt streckenkundler...
welzheimerwald (2023-09-15 15:07:25+00:00): Moin, die Bachunterführungen (tunnel/ layer -1) waren noch original in der OSM drin. Irgendjemand muss das Stäßle rausgelöscht haben, weil der Hof anscheinden gerade unbewohnt ist. In der Karte von Bing (https://www.bing.com/maps?cp=48.906985%7E9.915369&lvl=16.6) ist es drin. War wohl einfach nur die falsche Quelle
DD1GJ (2023-09-19 07:34:17+00:00): Von Bing dürfen wir nur die Luftbilder verwenden. Die Kartendarstellungen von Bing sind ebenfalls absolut tabu!
eggie (2023-09-08 08:47:58+00:00): Kennelijk rendert zand bovenop gras op de standaardkaart. Dat zal wellicht niet met alle kaarten het geval zijn.
Nu is de het grassgedeelte van het eilandje de inner en het water de outer.

Zou dat zand.... (eerdere tagging van mij) weg kunnen? 
gr eggie
Wesley_Link (2023-09-08 08:53:57+00:00): Maar is dat eiland nu wel goed? maar ik allen dus dat zand aanpassen
eggie (2023-09-08 08:59:49+00:00): Dat eiland klopt.. Het zand kun je gewoon weghalen als dat er niet hoort. Dat zit niet in een relatie.
Ben eigenlijk even op zoek naar die andere outer van dat grote stuk tussen de Waal en het binnenwater.
eggie (2023-09-08 09:06:28+00:00): Gevonden...  Dat zat net onder dat 'boseiland''   Het is nu weer één outer mp. De twee outers samengevoegd.
In principe heb je één outer...  en vaak meedere inners. Bij de rivieroever zelf kan het anders liggen, maar dat zijn veel langere stukken.
Wesley_Link (2023-09-08 09:11:42+00:00): Dat zand hoort er wel bij zo
eggie (2023-09-08 09:19:02+00:00): Wanneer je wat verder bent met die mp's.. Dan zul je zien dat je dan weer een aparte relatie nodig hebt om dat zand in te sluiten.
Dan wordt het graseiland ook een outer en het zand weer de inner. 
Dat zand is dan weer een 'eilandje' in het gras. Ik heb het over het westelijke eiland. 
Er kunnen dus meer relaties liggen op een lijnelement.
Wesley_Link (2023-09-08 09:31:15+00:00): Klopt het westelijke eiland ik zal er eens naar kijken
eggie (2023-09-08 08:53:49+00:00): Dat grote grasgebied bestaat met die ingesloten bosjes ..(Eén heb ik nog toegevoegd als inner) bestaat uit twee outers?  Dat zou er eigenlijk één moeten zijn.
MxxCon (2023-09-09 07:46:44+00:00): Hello.
Aren't "east" towers closer to the water?
Also are those proper names of these features or just something you came up with?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140963561
Dogman15 (2023-09-09 09:52:10+00:00): I'm going to ignore you and let you, one who is likely a New York native with better access to research such a thing, handle that. Fine. If you must know, I saw the name on another map.
MxxCon (2023-09-09 14:27:40+00:00): Woah, quiet an attitude there for a simple question, buddy. You'll do well to learn how to cooperate if you want to continue contributing to OSM.
In the mean time I'll leave this here for you to read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions
Sandal man (2023-09-08 04:57:15+00:00): Hello,
please make smalle change sets, this helps others in tracking changes. 

Thank you.
bxl-forever (2023-09-08 08:36:47+00:00): Hello,

It looks like you added lots of personal bookmarks in Organic Maps during a recent trip and inadvertently uploaded them to OSM.  On the contrary, if uploading all of this onto the map was wanted, here are some guidelines to help you make better contributions in the future.

Your edits seems to add several missing points to the map, which is quite useful.

However, there is an obvious abuse of the "name" tag.  The name of a feature in OSM is exclusively for objects that do have a name (streets have names, shops have names, churches or temples usually have names too).  Do not use it to write what looks more like a description.  Also, in OSM we use tags to make it sure that objects are properly identified: that is how objects are rendered with a correct icon and can be searched by category.


https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11175751640
name=Hindu temple
→ Should be religion=hindu

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11175714344
name:en=Church
→ Should not have a name, maybe building=church and religion and denomination tag

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11175714342
name:en=1000 for foreigners plus more for vehicle
→ Providing a full description of the current fare is nice but this should rather go to the description or fee tags.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11175761040
tourism=attraction + name=Painted rock, steps to the left go up to the monastery
→ ???

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11175761444
name:en=Buy ticket here for Hatra, 25000, bring your passport
→ Obvously, instructions such as "Bring your passport" should never be added to a name.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11175761461
amenity=restaurant + name=Many shops and restaurants
→ We get the idea and we understand that one can not make a full survey, especially during holidays, but maybe add one restaurant and one shop, do not put a name and put a fixme somewhere in one of them to briefly mention it is just one among many.  Anything but using the name tag for this.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11175761468
tourism=information + name:en=Next part of road 4wd only
→ Of course I could not verify whether there is really an informational board here saying this.  (That would make it clear whether this is an official recommendation by the authorities or your own POV about a difficult road.)  But the best way to convey this information would be to edit the road, for instance through a dedicated tag: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:4wd_only

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11175761539
tourism=information + name=Gate locked, no exit
→ Probably not to map as an information board but as a gate, adding access=no.  This is how we make sure that routers that use OSM data will know they may not route people through this point.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11175714338
tourism=attraction + name:en=Lighthouse
→ Unless this point is really an "attraction", which seems unlikely on a tiny island, the correct way to tag a lighthouse is with this: man_made=lighthouse.  And no name.


Hope this helps.
David White professor (2023-09-08 11:22:12+00:00): Hello. Thanks for the helpful info. Unfortunately, details like you list don't appear to be possible to add from the organic maps app. So, we should update these additions to, for example, put the extra info into the descriptions tag and not the name.

I don't know why all these added at once just now. On my phone I made these updates over a period of months, and they should have been getting added to OSM as we went. My intention at the time was in fact to add this info to OSM, not "personal bookmarks"

Now I'm back from traveling and busy with work so I don't have time to edit these things. And, a previous bad experience made me want to stop contributing to OSM. Hopefully someone else can edit so some of this work ends up being useful to future travelers instead of lost because just because it came from organic maps.
felipeeugenio (2023-09-08 19:47:43+00:00): Hola. La notaría cerró y ahora hay un café? Seguro?
Por favor ojo con las ediciones, que movió un banco a la mitad de la plaza para reemplazarlo por otro.

saludos
Fizzie-DWG (2023-12-19 06:15:39+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145277142
Nathan_A_RF (2023-09-11 13:21:45+00:00): I would suggest that this road is not an expressway. Despite the three grade separated junctions, there is access for pedestrians & cyclists, the speed limit is low and there are still numerous side roads within this section.
Falsernet (2023-09-11 19:31:08+00:00): The crux of it for me was that there are no right turns possible throughout the stretch. It doesn't have abutters and has numerous flyover bridges.

Perhaps motorroad=no would be a suitable additional tag, and/or additional access tags.

Having read the wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:expressway) I believe it meets the necessary criteria.
mariotomo (2023-09-11 07:38:15+00:00): hola. bienvenida a OSM. veo que se trata de tu primera contribución, es normal que tenga errores. si piensas contribuir con regularidad, te sugiero aprovechar de los comentarios que te se ofrecen, para mejorar. OSM es una base de datos global, con usuarios diferentes, desde principiantes, hasta Facebook y Apple. es importante participar en la comunidad. ciao, y otra vez bienvenida a OSM.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140965239
mariotomo (2023-09-11 07:52:11+00:00): I reviewed this contribution, it does not seem based on aerial photography, possibly it's based on direct observation, I don't dare revert it, but I have doubts on its correctness. I invite others to check, please.
JesseFTW (2023-09-08 12:14:12+00:00): Thanks for working on this! There's more needed to bring this up to the full PTv2 standard (like adding the route, not just the stops, and adding a route_master), but this is an improvement.
KevinMapsThings (2023-09-08 14:23:40+00:00): Slowly but surely, we'll get there. I wanted to make this change first so that I wouldn't forget that these already exist (in addition to the single other 71 route). I'm planning on adding the rest of the info shortly.
Xvtn (2023-09-08 15:58:35+00:00): Hi there! Thanks for your contributions. Just want to welcome you to OSM and to the valley!
Navigate_62 (2023-09-08 18:56:44+00:00): Thanks man! Looks like you've already put a lot of work in around here. I really appreciate that, especially the bike infrastructure
bxl-forever (2023-09-13 23:22:49+00:00): Hello,

This is one more friendly reminder to request to please avoid uploading changes for multiple countries at once.

When you claim to have added new roads in Kinshasa (Democratic Republic of the Congo)… but in fact you also added buildings in Samoa (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1206034055) it feels quite misleading.
Dodko (2023-09-08 21:42:02+00:00): Na poľné cesty nemá zmysel pridávať tagy
bicycle=yes
foot=yes
horse=yes
motor_vehicle=no

to už automaticky vyplýva z toho, že je to poľná cesta
mbehula (2023-09-09 04:24:06+00:00): Dik za info
MrMoehritz (2023-09-16 19:20:08+00:00): Hallo SebastianX,

du hast eine review requested. Seiht gut aus. Nur den Tag entrance=büroeingang gibt es so nicht. Wäre entrance=shop eine alternative: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:entrance ?
Rom1 (2023-09-08 07:05:24+00:00): Bonjour, je ne trouve pas sur https://www.inrae.fr/centres/grand-est-nancy une adresse pointant vers "Chemin forestier de Bouxières aux Chênes" (ce nom ne figure pas non plus au cadastre). Il s'agit d'une nouvelle signalétique ? Merci.