piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2026-01-04 07:09:24+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/1354052341 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Çiçekçi dükkanı Susurluk’ta"
---
Örneğin metnin daha tarafsız ve gerçek bir versiyonu şöyle olabilir: "Çiçekçi dükkanı Susurluk'ta"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-01-17 16:40:25+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/176831736
IsStatenIsland (2026-01-06 23:43:20+00:00): The Conrail/NJT/Amtrak property lines tripped me up too but I found a solid source last year. Please restore Amtrak ownership. NJT is also the sole lessor. 

https://www.njtransit.com/frequently-requested-nj-transit-records
"Amtrak Northeast Corridor agreement"
1__AMENDED AND RESTATED NORTHEAST CORRIDOR SVCS AGMT__AS15200263 NECSA 2016.pdf (section 2.10 page 19)
"The southerly line of the Jersey Avenue grade crossing is also the property line between Amtrak and Conrail"

The ETT you referenced (which I have too, and maybe you actually read from my upload) also defines a speed limit for the Millstone Running Track between County and Jersey Ave Road crossing.
https://archive.org/details/AMTK-NEC-employee-timetable-20251103-si

I think you're correct for removing the NYP label though.
IsStatenIsland (2026-01-06 23:44:25+00:00): Also the Amtrak portion is not usage=industrial as it's a passenger track
RailandSea (2026-01-07 10:17:51+00:00): I was reading both books on that section updating the passenger stations crashed ID on the browser some of the updates didn’t upload or revert. That was my bad I’ll fix it up there’s a few things on the NEC that didn’t restore from the crash. Running track is basically a yard track just verbal permission from the dispatcher.
mueschel (2026-01-04 14:37:53+00:00): Hi,
hier fehlen die Tags an der Relation:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20044848
anshanin (2026-01-06 19:18:05+00:00): It looks like EKO1 returned to Trg Nikole Pašića
NeisBot (2026-01-03 23:57:22+00:00): Hi 1RL, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 97% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 41 highway(s)
- 2 railway(s)
- 1 source(s)
- 31 surface(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=176801960
woodpeck (2026-01-04 00:08:10+00:00): Agreed - you will have to explain your deletions if you want them to stand. "Green Trail" is not a suffcient explanation for deleting data that has bee in OSM for over 12 years. Has the area been bulldozed? Have the trails been replaced to build a mine?
1RL (2026-01-04 00:11:43+00:00): The cross country ski trails in this area are not traced out correctly.  I would like to digitize them spatially correct and with their associated names.
woodpeck (2026-01-04 00:15:49+00:00): You are free to do that (providing you are using a source that is not subject to copyright!) but unless you are uploading new data within the next couple of hours, we should restore the old trails until you actually replace them.
1RL (2026-01-04 00:19:33+00:00): I will digitize the trails now. I am the Club's vice president and Trail coordinator and know the trails well.  The old trails should not be restored as they are inaccurate.
1RL (2026-01-04 00:20:46+00:00): I would like to add the trails name, much like I see at other cross country ski facilities and down hill ski resorts. I am just trying to figure out how to do that.
ChJn (2026-01-09 14:55:21+00:00): Děkuji za smazání. Při vytváření objektu jsem buď neměl aktuální mapu nebo jsem se špatně koukal :(
amunak (2026-01-09 18:49:32+00:00): Však v pohodě, stane se. Jen mi to přišlo vtipné. :)
Yog Sot (2026-01-04 20:50:38+00:00): nie ustawiaj access=no na chodnikach, bo nimi mogą jeździć hulajnogi oraz inne ustrojstwa, ale również rowery pod okreslonymi warunkami, których nie zawarłeś. 
Skasuj ten access najlepiej.
Feskil (2026-01-04 21:28:28+00:00): Poprawiłem
Yog Sot (2026-01-05 10:48:52+00:00): dzięki
eggie (2026-01-04 08:28:52+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Dawid2849 (2026-01-07 18:59:05+00:00): Cześć,

w okolicy planowanych MOPów Strzelewo część obiektów jest zmapowana jako istniejąca: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13429570068
d3mol3k (2026-01-07 20:03:12+00:00): dzieki - już poprawiam
NeisBot (2026-01-04 07:06:47+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 22 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/29262549 v19 | 22 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=176802609
NeisReview (2026-01-17 16:35:45+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/176802634
NeisBot (2026-01-04 07:09:26+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13429603844 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Assisted living community"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-17 16:40:26+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177343425
(Deleted leftovers after several edits)
KennyDap (2026-01-04 11:28:44+00:00): This doesn't seem like the right name for a company.
5m4u9 (2026-01-05 03:20:56+00:00): Hola, bienvenid@ y gracias por mejorar el mapa de Potosí.

Sería de gran utilidad saber el sentido/dirección de las calles y algunos nombres de alrededor....
CAM-Gerlach (2026-01-05 05:56:06+00:00): NB, I've been mapping all way stops on the intersection node, per the wiki and how I've generally seen existing ones mapped, since the relevant wiki page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dstop#All-way_stop says "All-way stops should be shown using highway=stop at the intersection node." I also tag them with stop=all per the wiki recommendation, as well as direction=both per one of my JOSM validators for explicitness (I have this trifecta as a macro, so I can apply all three with one keystroke). You can tag the stop lines (i.e. the currently tagged nodes) with road_marking=stop_
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176805088
CAM-Gerlach (2026-01-05 06:06:27+00:00): *Please disregard previous comment, I accidentally fat-fingered the post button.*

CORRECTED:

NB, I've been mapping all way stops on the intersection node, per the wiki spec and how I've generally seen existing ones mapped, since the relevant wiki page highway=stop#All-way_stop says "All-way stops should be shown using highway=stop at the intersection node." I also tag them with stop=all per the wiki suggestion , as well as direction=both per one of my JOSM validators for explicitness (I have this tag trifecta as a macro, so I can apply all three with one keystroke).

You could instead tag the actual stop lines (i.e. the nodes currently tagged with highway=stop) with road_marking=stop_line (+ stroke=solid); per the wiki, "road_marking=stop_line indicates where the painted stop line is physically located, regardless of which node you tag as highway=stop, but only if there's a painted stop line." (which has been the case for all but a few of the all-way stops I've mapped so far in Blacksburg, versus perhaps half or fewer of the stop=minor s).

As that had not been added last time I checked the page, I had only been adding stop_line tagging so for minor-way stops, but just now I went back and added them for all the all-way stops I've added (except one or two that didn't actually have stop lines).
Frank Peng (2026-01-06 04:19:13+00:00): Whoops! Looks like I made a mistake here. :) I went ahead and retagged the stop sign nodes on the painted stop lines as road_marking=stop_line + stroke=solid and properly tagged the intersection node as highway=stop + direction=both. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176886412
I had been tagging intersection nodes as stop signs where there is an all-way stop, but for this all-way stop in front of University Mall, I added the stop sign nodes on the stop lines instead of a stop sign node on the intersection node due to me failing to exercise diligence when mapping the stop signs. In the future, I will be sure to be more diligent when adding or modifying map features (such as stop signs).
CAM-Gerlach (2026-01-07 11:18:04+00:00): No worries at all, man! I get all bummed out too when I realize I made a mistake, but I find there's always something new to learn and improve with OSM and it was a learning opportunity for both of us; I didn't realize myself until double-checking the wiki on this changeset that recommended tagging practice had evolved to explicitly condone tagging a node of a highway=* way with road_marking=* without highway=stop in the case of all-way stops.

And I have the utmost respect for you and your mapping skill! FWIW, for the longest time I've found public transport relations the most complex set of concepts, rules and practices to master in OSM (and still wouldn't consider myself nearly having done so yet, having only recently really started to engage with them), whereas you seem to be quite adept at them. So when I finally get around to fixing the various Osmose-detected issues with BT transit's I've indirectly touched (hopefully soon), I'm sure you'll have some helpful feedback in case I miss anything!
felipeeugenio (2026-01-04 11:56:05+00:00): Hola. por favor no cambiar categorías de caminos sin consultar antes. Puede unirse al chat de la comunidad Nacional en Telegram en el link en mi perfil. También hay un chat especializado en maperos de la Serena y Coquimbo. Saludos y nos vemos.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176805825
felipeeugenio (2026-01-04 11:54:11+00:00): Hola. Gracias por sus ediciones. Buenos dias.

Por favor no usar nombres descriptivos. Solo oficiales.
Por otro lado. independiente que la gente entre caminando, pueden entrar autos? el camino se ve bastante ancho, pero lo dejó inhabilitado para autos.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176805852
user_23671081 (2026-01-04 18:07:32+00:00): Hola, buenas tardes, es un acceso peatonal rocoso y de tierra, se verá ancho, pero NO es para vehículos, quizás motocicletas Enduro, pero es un riesgo para los peatones.
felipeeugenio (2026-01-05 11:19:49+00:00): Ok, gracias. Lo dejé como camino de servicios, pero con motor_vehicle=no.

saludos
Leo Slager (2026-01-04 22:20:58+00:00): Dag DwarfNebula,

Het toevoegen van de eind halte als begin halte leidt direct tot foutmeldingen.
Kun je iook uitleggen waarom je dat wilt doen ?
DwarfNebula_ (2026-01-05 12:29:10+00:00): Hi Leo,

Ik ben bij deze relatie alleen bezig geweest met het aanpassen van de route die tegen het verkeer in ging. De editor heeft de volgorde (fout) aangepast. Het lijkt erop dat dat relatify nog niet goed om kan gaan met cirkel routes waarbij de route zichzelf kruist, want volgens mij heb jij hetzelfde al bij lijn 2 moeten corrigeren. Ik zal met deze editor voortaan van de cirkel routes afblijven en de bug even melden bij de maker.

Groet Jasper.
Baloo Uriza (2026-01-05 15:36:29+00:00): It's generally good practice to save your work before moving to a geographically distant location.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176806430
NeisBot (2026-01-04 07:15:37+00:00): 🌍 Willkommen bei OSM, Piing.
Danke für deine Beiträge.

Um die Zusammenarbeit zu erleichtern und anderen zu helfen, deine Änderungen zu verstehen, ist es am besten, wenn du eine kurze Beschreibung der von dir vorgenommenen Änderungen hinzufügst. Klar formulierte Kommentare helfen der Community, deiner Arbeit zu folgen und bessere Rückmeldungen zu geben. Du findest Tipps zum Schreiben guter Kommentare hier[1].

✅ Hier ist ein Beispielkommentar basierend auf deinen Karteneditierungen: "Baum mit laubabwerfenden Spitzahorn-Eigenschaften hinzugefügt"
(Auto-translation)
---
🌍 Welcome to OSM, Piing.
Thanks for contributing!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

✅ Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added tree with deciduous Spitzahorn characteristics"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment #NoComment
NeisBot (2026-01-04 07:15:39+00:00): 🌍 Welcome to OSM, FSG|TAZ_MAN.
Thanks for contributing!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

✅ Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added farmland areas"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish
wachsihh (2026-01-05 12:31:30+00:00): Moin und willkommen bei OSM,
sei doch bitte so nett und lösche nicht einfach Elemente anderer Nutzer ohne Rücksprache. In diesem Fall war es doch highway=service, also nicht falsch. Ich habe den Änderungssatz zurückgenommen und service=driveway ergänzt. So werden üblicherweise Gründstücksauffahrten getagt.
Beste Grüße!
真中あお (2026-01-04 20:15:44+00:00): 您好，感谢您为OSM做出贡献，但是您的编辑习惯中存在一些误区，上传的数据和OSM通行的惯例是不符的，有必要和您说一下：
OSM不是历史地图，只应该绘制现在存在的地理事物。而historic=battlefield这个tag只是用于附加在本身就可以画在地图上的事物上的，不应该单独标点；
wikipedia这个key中应该填该地理事物本身的条目名，而不是与该地理相关的事件等其他事物的条目；
在填写多语言名称时，应该尽量查找实地或官方是否公布有外文名，退而求其次应调查在该语言中是否已有通行的名称，而不要贸然自行翻译；
在添加多语言的同时也不要忘了本地语言，对于中国（少数民族地区以外）就是需要将name中的内容复制到name:zh。
对于这个变更集中的以上问题，我进行了修正。祝你将来在对OSM的规则更加熟悉的基础上，画得开心~
(computer translation vision)
Hello, thank you for your contributions to OSM. However, there are some misconceptions in your editing habits, and the data you uploaded does not align with common OSM practices. It is necessary to clarify the following:
OSM is not a historical map; it should only represent geographical features that currently exist. The tag historic=battlefield should only be used for features that can already be mapped, and should not be applied independently;
The wikipedia key should contain the name of the article about the geographical feature itself, not a revent or other matter associated with that feature;
When entering multilingual names, you should first check if the place has an official foreign name. If not, at least verify whether there is an established name in that language, rather than translating it byself;
While adding multilingual tags, do not forget the local language. For China (except ethnic minority area), this means copying the content from name into name:zh.
I have made corrections for the above issues in this changeset. 
May you enjoy mapping even more in the future as you become more familiar with OSM's rules.
EthanWalker83764 (2026-01-05 04:33:00+00:00): 您好，osm不是私人地图，请不要搞破坏
gc27 (2026-03-12 23:59:49+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:%E3%82%B0%E3%83%83%E3%83%89%E3%83%97%E3%83%A9%E3%82%AF%E3%83%86%E3%82%A3%E3%82%B9#%E8%87%AA%E5%88%86%E3%81%8C%E5%BF%85%E8%A6%81%E3%81%A8%E3%81%97%E3%81%AA%E3%81%84%E3%81%BE%E3%81%9F%E3%81%AF%E5%A5%BD%E3%81%BE%E3%81%AA%E3%81%84%E3%82%AA%E3%83%96%E3%82%B8%E3%82%A7%E3%82%AF%E3%83%88%E3%82%92%E5%89%8A%E9%99%A4%E3%81%97%E3%81%AA%E3%81%84 10000件の削除された編集対象の個々をレビューできるわけではありませんが。

また、道路の精度についてとりあげた記述ではありますが、  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:%E7%B7%A8%E9%9B%86%E3%81%AE%E6%A8%99%E6%BA%96%E3%81%A8%E6%85%A3%E4%BE%8B
> どの程度の精度が十分であるかは、それぞれのユーザによって異なります

総じて、「乖離を修正」ではなく「削除」するこのChangeSetの内容に異論があります。
Yog Sot (2026-01-04 21:10:03+00:00): skasowałeś historię wersji dla przedszkola np a w innym miejscu dodałeś proponowany las. Nie mapujemy w OSM takich odległych mglistych wizjii. spytaj się na forum w razie w pls
Feskil (2026-01-04 21:29:15+00:00): Dobrze
hatul (2026-04-06 09:32:03+00:00): שלום עופר, תודה על התוספת.
בבקשה להימנע משמות כלליים כמו מערות שברורים מסוג הנקודה.
לא חחיבים להוסיף שם.
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-07 05:52:48+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8710944914
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8710956084
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/461160506
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1084255111

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-07 06:12:33+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8710944914
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8710956084
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/461160506
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1084255111

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-07 06:22:58+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8710944914
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8710956084
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/461160506
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1084255111

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
FajrAl (2026-01-05 07:37:35+00:00): tekan tombol Q untuk mengotakkan bangunan
user_5359 (2026-01-04 09:10:53+00:00): wrong description: remove white space from addr:province
Glassman (2026-01-04 20:39:45+00:00): You changed some sidewalks to paths but I walk and drive by them all the time and they look and feel like sidewalks. Can you review this edit? Let me know if you need help.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176811133
Natfoot (2026-03-09 06:21:21+00:00): sidewalks can still have bike designated
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176811133
Glassman (2026-03-11 20:34:06+00:00): Nat - my issue wasn't with the bicycle tag, but changing the footway to a path. It's a sidewalk, aka footway.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176811133
NeisBot (2026-01-05 07:23:29+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13430047625 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Flower shop"
---
例如，更中立和事实性的文字版本可以是：“花店”
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-01-17 16:40:27+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/176891431
Thanks @mueschel
OSM_RogerWilco (2026-01-04 14:56:46+00:00): Moin mapperue,
kannst Du mir Deine Änderung bitte erklären. Ich habe den Wert für sport aus dem Wiki übernommen.
Siehe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:cycling=pump%20track?uselang=de
Ist das Wiki falsch?
Viele Grüße
Roger Wilco
mapperue (2026-01-04 15:10:53+00:00): Hi, key inline_skates describes access. See: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:inline_skates and
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Droller_skating
OSM_RogerWilco (2026-01-04 15:21:30+00:00): The Key "inline_skates=*" describes access. Thats correct. But here we are talking about “inline_skates” as a value of sport.

Inline_skates is a more common value for sport or route than roller_skates. Take a look at taginfo.


I still think roller_skates is better because it also includes inline_skates.

We should discuss this and then update the wiki.
OSM_RogerWilco (2026-01-04 15:26:30+00:00): Ah! I understand now that it should be sport=roller_skating. It's correct on the English wiki page. I'll correct the German wiki page.

Thanks for pointing that out!
Rainero (2026-03-29 11:29:42+00:00): Revert changeset/180578157
wegen nicht zulässiger Quelle (Bayernatlas).
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-08 02:08:22+00:00): Removed SEO spam and cleaned up other tags for POI in changeset 183805348

https://osm.org/changeset/183805348
LordGarySugar (2026-05-31 15:25:11+00:00): Hi, for your information I have re-drawn some of the residential landuse here - to unglue it from the roads and to make sure that it only covers areas where people actually live. My changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183453324 . Hope that's ok.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-08 02:05:07+00:00): Reverted SEO spam-delism adding a POI with spam tags onto a road and node-dragging it, and other unexplained changes

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183805311
AndyB_66 (2026-01-04 10:39:32+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Dobr%C3%A9_koment%C3%A1%C5%99e_sad_zm%C4%9Bn
Taya_S (2026-01-29 08:37:10+00:00): Reverted boundary edit

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177836298
Taya_S (2026-01-29 08:48:27+00:00): Reverted unexplained boundary edit

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177836745
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2026-05-13 15:42:55+00:00): Please avoid separating bicycle and pedestrian paths which are not physically separated. It creates a busy, hard to manage map. It also makes routing complex, as in reality you can move from one path to another without any problems, but on the map you need to connect them.

You've also forgot some bicycle-related tags on the footway.

I may revert this when I have the time.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2026-05-25 19:44:30+00:00): reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183174685