piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
jm428 (2026-01-13 20:24:49+00:00): Hi, I am curious how you decided to classify places, because I don't think some of these places fit the definition of a village. Amherst Center for example doesn't fit the wiki definition of a village in my opinion: https://www.osm.org/node/13388820240
Zack Bowden (2026-01-13 20:40:37+00:00): Hi, so the reason why I did that, is because when I was scrolling through the map recently, someone had changed it from whatever it was before, I'm not sure what; to a "borough/suburb" (as they had done to several other places in the area that were too small to fit the criteria), and I downgraded it to a village. If you think that doesn't work, you can certainly downgrade it further (to a hamlet or a neighborhood, for example) if you think that fits it better, and I wouldn't object to that. :)
jm428 (2026-01-15 03:24:11+00:00): That makes sense. I initially hesitated with 'village' because I don’t see it as a distinct settlement. I’m still figuring out when to use the various place values.
I see you changed it to a neighborhood already, thanks!
jmchatton (2026-02-03 15:03:41+00:00): These changes are incorrect. Boroughs are the proper place type for the next-smallest organizational unit in a municipality, what traditionally Americans would call a "neighborhood". 

From https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place=suburb :

"OSM's usage of 'suburb' is different than that used by North American English, where a suburb is "an area, often residential, outside of a central city". Often these suburbs are distinct settlements and will be tagged as place=village, place=town, or place=city, depending on factors such as population. In contrast, a district, ward, or borough of an American or Canadian city would best be categorized as place=suburb."
Colaborador anónimo de osm (2026-01-18 20:10:29+00:00): Could someone tell me why I got downvoted? Mercadona has closed down here for good, so I deleted it.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-04 06:42:46+00:00): Hello!

You used
building=garageS
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/871460734/history

Have you maybe meant
building=garages
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
Map-Rider (2026-02-04 18:55:23+00:00): Thank you for highlighting that. I have made the necessary changes.
Rainero (2026-03-21 15:33:42+00:00): Revert mit changeset/180212964
(unzulässige Quelle)
Константин Гам (2026-01-12 09:28:43+00:00): Здравствуйте! Не меняйте тип пешеходной дорожки на полевую. То что какие-то одарённые люди ездят по пешеходке, не делают её леской или полевой.
Имею четкие фото до снега, тут именно пешеходка без каких-либо сомнений.
eggie (2026-01-11 18:55:44+00:00): Oke, maar ipv bicycle=no taggen we bicycle=use_sidepath
(Fietsers horen het fietspad te volgen) 
Het effect is hetzelfde, maar volgens de wegenverkeerswet is er wel verschil.
Allen bij een bord C14 en/of C15 taggen we bicycle=no
bicycle=no is een fietsverbod en dat is hier niet het geval.. Je moet alleen het fietspad volgen. De nuance.. 
gr eggie
juni_vv (2026-01-11 18:59:58+00:00): oke, ga ik doen. bedankt!

mvg
juniper
eggie (2026-01-11 19:05:40+00:00): en dan de tagging van een G11 fietspad Zie

Presets: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=31077
G11: mofa=yes, moped=no, traffic_sign=NL:G11
G12a: moped=designated, mofa=designated, traffic_sign=NL:G12a
G13: moped=no, mofa=no, traffic_sign=NL:G13

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Cycleway

In JOSM zit onder Voorkeur de presets voor de drie verschillende klasse fietspaden.
juni_vv (2026-01-11 19:14:02+00:00): ahh thanks die presets zijn echt handig
soliMM (2026-01-13 21:11:21+00:00): Is this based on traffic signs alongside these roads or just your guess?

I passed next to this road https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/136327334 and looking from the main road I haven't seen any speed limit sign. Could you provide photo of 30 km/h sign?
eggie (2026-01-11 20:16:15+00:00): Tip  Probeer indien mogelijk op de bestaande adresnodes bij te taggen en anders een compleet adres toe te voegen.

MVG
eggie
SJ30Y (2026-01-11 20:28:54+00:00): Hi, sorry. Ik heb dit meermaals gedaan. Ik zal er op letten. Mvg SJ
eggie (2026-01-11 20:55:14+00:00): Denk dat het hier lastig is om de bestaande adresnodes op te sporen.. als ze er al zijn.
Bij een aantal het ik de plaatsnaam toegevoegd.
Mapse verder..
eggie
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-14 03:45:20+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10002250186
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/121896399

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-14 03:54:56+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10002250186
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/121896399

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-14 04:15:12+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10002250186
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/121896399

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-14 04:24:55+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10002250186
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/121896399

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Marek-M (2026-01-14 10:06:08+00:00): Adresy poprawione:
 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177212983
Lokai (2026-01-13 18:21:22+00:00): Hallo.

Eine Frage zur Brücke über den Saugraben. Ist die Brücke in irgend einer Form beschädigt. Davor und danach verläuft ein gemeinsamer Fuß- und Radweg.

Gruß

Lokai
mahama2 (2026-01-13 18:43:48+00:00): Hallo Lokai,

direkt an den drei Brücken stehen jeweils beidseitig die Schilder Nr. 254 (Verbot für Radverkehr). Das steht zwar im Widerspruch zur Radwegbenutzungspflicht (Zeichen 240), die ansonsten für den parallel zur Straße verlaufenden Weg gilt. Das Verbotsschild wurde (vermutlich von der Gemeinde aufgrund der Rutschgefahr?) jedoch so aufgestellt.
Eine Beschädigung ist mir nicht bekannt.

Gruß
mahama2
Lokai (2026-01-13 18:59:58+00:00): Das könnte der Grund sein. Ich kenne Brücken, dort wird auf die Rutschgefahr hingewiesen. Es gibt auch Rad-Brücken mit geändertem Belag.
Danke für die Antwort.
mahama2 (2026-01-13 19:36:30+00:00): Ich behalte die Brücken im Auge und korrigiere die Karte, sobald sich an der Beschilderung etwas ändert.
mahama2 (2026-01-15 15:02:39+00:00): Ich bin die Strecke heute erneut gefahren und habe festgestellt, dass die Verbotsschilder wieder entfernt wurden. Womöglich gab es Beschwerden.
@Lokai: Kann man die Änderung hier wieder rückgängig machen?
Dindia (2026-01-19 20:24:48+00:00): Hi Yitzchak,
You changed the path to be footway.
This appears to be incorrect according to:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=path

Current usage of highway=path: Ways used by pedestrians, small vehicles like bicycles, for animal riding or livestock walking. This includes walking and hiking trails, bike paths, horse and stock trails, mountain bike trails, as well as multi-use paths for cyclists and pedestrians or similar combinations. Certain types of paths are tagged more specifically with highway=footway, highway=cycleway, and highway=bridleway, but in many cases none of those quite fit so highway=path is used instead.



https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=footway?uselang=en-GB

Footways tend to be constructed and either paved or with smooth surface (compacted, wood or similar). The elderly and small children and wheelchair users can use them with ease. They tend to be in urban settings.

Please revert your changes.
Thanks
Yitzchak M (2026-01-20 01:17:27+00:00): Hi Danny,
A path on the beach through the sand of the beach is not passable by a bicycle. It is 100% a footway. I stand by my change.
Dindia (2026-01-20 09:43:20+00:00): I was actually cycling there yesterday on the packed sand, it's also possible horseback riding there. But the question is not whether it's only for walking or not . 
Here is the definition of footway in OSM:

highway=footway?uselang=en-GB

Footways tend to be constructed and either paved or with smooth surface (compacted, wood or similar). The elderly and small children and wheelchair users can use them with ease. They tend to be in urban settings.

Constructed, easy to use, tend to be in urban settings.
Yitzchak M (2026-01-20 10:13:03+00:00): I hear what you are saying, but I am still not convinced. Here in Israel, in the Arava and the Judean Desert, many many trails which are merely flat and sandy like a beach are defined as highway=footway. Raise this question in the OSM Telegram group, and whatever Zeev says, I will do, no problem. Thanks.
Dindia (2026-01-20 10:24:19+00:00): If something is marked wrong then it needs to be fixed, not be a reason for incorrect tagging in other places. 
The description in OSM manual is clear enough: 

Footways tend to be constructed and either paved or with smooth surface (compacted, wood or similar). The elderly and small children and wheelchair users can use them with ease. They tend to be in urban settings.

It's NEITHER, yet you tagged it as footway. 

In Jaffa, you changed a way that is obviously a footway to a path.
Yitzchak M (2026-01-20 10:41:29+00:00): If it is not marked foot only or not marked bicycle only, then it is a path. 

I am beginning to feel that you are targeting me, and I am growing resentful.
mat (2026-01-12 06:53:12+00:00): Ce changeset supprime les voies principales, ça semble être une erreur.
mueschel (2026-01-13 14:31:45+00:00): Hi,
I found a few strange tags here with missing number and spelling mistake, could you check that?

int_ref=E-
int_Ref=E-
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2026-01-13 15:53:47+00:00): Hello @mueschel . As far as I can tell, this is the 14th account this person has created. The previous 13 accounts were banned. However, every time an account is banned, he/she keeps creating new ones. I listed all of them on the forum: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/olasi-vandalizm-suphelileri-geri-dondurme/138035/3

I think he wrote int_ref=E- knowing that they would complete the process once they learned the ref code. He knows this is wrong but he don't care.

He never responds to changeset discussions, and I don't think he reads the changeset discussions either. (DWG said that comments on changesets should be written on the person's incorrect changesets, so I continue to write comments on changesets.) I think he reads the messages sent to him, but he probably doesn't look at discussions on changesets.  

Have a nice day.

Translated with DeepL.com (free version)
NeisBot (2026-01-17 15:19:22+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/712071335 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Midcities Montessori Academy"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-01-25 07:29:37+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/177340473
TrickyFoxy (2026-01-13 21:35:28+00:00): Тут действительно два банкомата?
user_23697509 (2026-01-14 02:41:18+00:00): Да, тут два банкомата
welzheimerwald (2026-02-01 21:07:49+00:00): Wieso wurde hier der amtliche Regionalschlüssel rausgelöscht?
dadavid (2026-05-28 11:54:26+00:00): gleiche Frage zur wikidate ID, war die Löschung Absicht oder ein Versehen?
spughetti (2026-01-11 19:47:32+00:00): Related:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177110298
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177110321
spughetti (2026-01-11 19:47:45+00:00): Related:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177110284
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177110321
spughetti (2026-01-11 19:47:59+00:00): Related:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177110284
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177110298
JasiahMaps1010 (2026-01-11 19:56:17+00:00): Note that I did not mean for the bridge name to be "Riverview Boulevard South" (same as the road name)
eggie (2026-01-11 20:11:53+00:00): city toegevoegd
A67-A67 (2026-01-11 22:20:31+00:00): Alexanderhoeve stond al in Openstreetmap. Ik heb de dubbeling verwijderd.
eggie (2026-01-11 20:11:11+00:00): city toegevoegd
A67-A67 (2026-01-11 22:20:07+00:00): Bakker Ammerlaan stond al in Openstreetmap. Ik heb de dubbeling verwijderd.
NeisBot (2026-01-17 15:19:25+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13448759059 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Dunn Heating and Air Conditioning Waterloo"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-25 07:29:37+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177670962
(No visible changes after review)
gscholz (2026-01-12 06:58:08+00:00): Hi waterced,
this changeset has destroyed the region relation for "Massifs des Baronnies":

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=5.38820&lat=44.25447&zoom=10&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=177111039

Can you please fix this?

I like to recommend to upload changesets in smaller chunks so the are easier to repair if something goes wrong. Generally I also recommend do avoid using ID while working on relations, because there is no feedback on errors like this. Use JOSM instead.

Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2026-01-12 07:03:22+00:00): By the way, this changeset also damaged the boundary relation of "Bollène", which was repaired just this morning here:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177122396#map=19/44.262331/4.932913

These errors are very typical for ID users, working on relations.
waterced (2026-01-12 08:36:47+00:00): Hi Guido,
I was mostly correcting minor changes here and there and was therefore using iD. I noticed the relation while editing and tried not damaging it, but it appears it happened anyway. I'll look into fixing it today. Thanks for notifying me
waterced
gscholz (2026-01-12 12:18:08+00:00): Hi waterced,
thanks for your quick response. I hope that your corrections will be successful.
Guido
waterced (2026-01-12 12:39:17+00:00): Hi,
I should have fixed with the "ring not closed error" with the following changeset : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177135881

As for the "self intersection of a relation" (here: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=4.93260&lat=44.26227&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways ), I'm not sure wether I was originally the cause of it and if it's still there.

Do you know how often geofabrik runs its error tracking ?

waterced
gscholz (2026-01-13 06:59:41+00:00): Hi waterced,
the OSMI views are updated only once per day at about 00 GMT, so every morning there is a fresh view available.

The issue seems to be fixed now.
Guido
silversurfer83 (2026-01-12 18:33:23+00:00): hi

access=no bedeutet, dass kein Zugang für niemanden besteht. Ist das an dieser Stelle korrekt?

Und noch eine Bitte: Deine Kommentare sind teils noch ausbaufähig. Check mal https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177111138
silversurfer83 (2026-01-19 20:09:12+00:00): Und?
eggie (2026-01-12 11:57:10+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
dzamper (2026-03-18 17:30:16+00:00): Why have you added the same name to both `name:de` and `old_name:de`? Shouldn't it be one or the other?

+
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
eggie (2026-01-11 21:29:44+00:00): Hoe kan een identiek adres zicht op twee verschillende locaties bevinden.
Ik heb er één verwijderd.
De ander samengevoegd met het bestaande adres.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-01-11 21:30:23+00:00): Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=177111519
Hb- (2026-03-18 13:54:16+00:00): Schon mal gut, dass hier keine Punkte verschoben wurden. Der Ansatz dürfte kaum greifen, siehe note/5119751
Sylabowy Kot (2026-01-11 20:44:07+00:00): Koronie Modlińskiej*
silversurfer83 (2026-01-11 21:19:11+00:00): Hi :)

danke, dass du es versuchst. Waldwege, auf denen auch Forstwirtschaftliche Fahrzeuge unterwegs sind, sind bei den Objekteigenschaften ganz oben links im Editor (Objekttyp auswählen) (wenn der Weg ausgewählt ist) unter "Waldweg" zu finden. Jetzt hast du alle Wege zu highway=path (Pfad) gemacht, was nicht bei allen korrekt sein dürfte.

Wie gesagt: Wenn du Fragen hast, meld dich bitte. Wir versuchen gerne Dir zu helfen die Daten der Welt korrekt für OSM zu erfassen, so dass wir am Ende alle eine bessere Datenbank für Karten haben.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177112411
Growebis (2026-01-11 20:53:57+00:00): i meant added a u turn but i misclicked
eggie (2026-01-11 21:17:03+00:00): Dag Aartsie

Het staat al op access=no  Dus daar hoeft geen foot=no bij.
Het is door de voorgaande mapper zo getagd om te voorkomen dat de wandelroute 41-45 wordt onderbroken.
Daar 'moet' dus nog een oplossing voor worden gevonden. 
Met dit veerpontje is kan ik me herinneren ooit een ongeluk gebeurd toen het te overladen de overkant probeerde te halen.
Hoe zit het dan nu het met veerpontje? 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-01-11 21:19:13+00:00): https://www.rijnmond.nl/nieuws/1622246/onderzoek-naar-omgeslagen-trekpontje-maximum-aantal-personen-werd-kort-na-ongeluk-toegevoegd-op-google-maps
Aartsie (2026-01-12 20:51:48+00:00): Aah mijn excuses, ik had hem eerst op Yes gezet en bedacht mij later kan hem beter op No laten staan gezien hij niet toegankelijk is. Schijnbaar heeft hij deze change wel meegenomen.

Het klopt inderdaad dat de trekpont na een ongeluk in 2023 niet meer is terug geplaatst. Deze wordt vervangen door een brug. Hiervoor is een subsidieaanvraag ingediend waarbij ze verwacht hadden dat deze in 2025 zou worden gerealiseerd. Echter is dit nog niet het geval.

Toen ik er gisteren was zag ik dat deze er nogsteeds niet was en wilde ik OSM dus updaten.

Mvg, Aartsie

https://www.grootnissewaard.nl/nieuws/politiek/201002/trekpont-wordt-brug

https://www.ad.nl/nissewaard/wandelaars-kunnen-nog-steeds-niet-rondje-beningerslikken-lopen-brug-laat-lang-op-zich-wachten~a8f5f939/
eggie (2026-01-12 20:56:05+00:00): Oke.. voorlopig maar zo laten. We wachten wel op de brug.. Dat wordt vast ergens gepubliceerd.

Mapse..
eggie
Herwescheluc (2026-01-11 21:10:19+00:00): Something went wrong...

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177113419
pwbriggs (2026-01-15 19:01:04+00:00): FYI this was removed by another contributor in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177243135. I'm not familiar with this area, but is this camera not in fact here?
TinPetreković (2026-01-12 09:12:27+00:00): The tag that was accidentally removed has been added back in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177128097
silversurfer83 (2026-01-12 18:29:24+00:00): Hi :)

die Daten der Schule insgesamt werden am umliegenden Gelände erfasst. Dieses Gebäude ist nur ein Gebäude, in dem ggf. Unterricht stattfindet.

Bei Fragen immer raus damit. Details zu vielen Dingen findest du im Wiki unter wiki.osm.org

happy mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177113365
eggie (2026-01-11 21:23:54+00:00): Dag Hos,

Op de Bemmelsewaard staat nog steeds motor_vehicle=no..

Klopt dat dan wel?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-01-11 21:24:43+00:00): Mag je er wel fietsen, wandelen e.d. ?
eggie (2026-01-11 21:35:46+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Hos19275 (2026-01-12 07:04:00+00:00): Ha Eggie,
Bedankt! Noorderplas is tussen Veenwoud en Westeinderplas definitief opengesteld voor al het verkeer. 
Bemmelsewaard is ter hoogte van Westeinderplas afgesloten voor al het verkeer. Je kunt er nog wel komen als voetganger, maar de dam in de plas wordt binnenkort verwijderd.
Grt Hos
eggie (2026-01-12 07:10:43+00:00): Oke.. in dat geval zal het dan vehicle=no 'moeten' zijn. Dus alles met wielen.
Mapse..
eggie
stillhart (2026-03-05 22:32:30+00:00): der Supercharger hat doch niemals 500 kW????
Alexander1234567543 (2026-03-07 14:16:01+00:00): 1MW Gesamtleistung 
Max 500kw pro Landepunkt
Bei  1000V 500A
stillhart (2026-03-07 18:58:02+00:00): Wusste nicht dass das irgend ein Tesla supercharger kann😳
pwbriggs (2026-01-12 04:19:00+00:00): Hey, does Brian's Automotive replace "Quality Auto Sales & Service" which used to be here? Or do the two companies share this space?
Glassman (2026-01-13 00:25:18+00:00): This was likely done by an SEO who probably won't answer. Feel free to remove the node if you don't think it is correct.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177113963
pwbriggs (2026-01-13 04:36:42+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Glassman are you saying that Brian's Auto might not be located here? Or that it probably replaced Quality Auto?
Glassman (2026-01-13 15:58:38+00:00): No, what I'm saying is that SEO edits are notorious for bad quality. I do find it interesting that both businesses show up on a web search at that address. Both have pictures of what appear to be the same building.
pwbriggs (2026-01-14 00:13:24+00:00): Okay, I opened a note.
Brian's Automotive & Performance (2026-01-15 15:10:07+00:00): Hi, @pwbriggs, this location is shared by several automotive services - Brian's Automotive & Performance is one of them - please refer to https://maps.app.goo.gl/pu3mVXeheD2n6z9WA. Thanks
Glassman (2026-01-15 18:40:50+00:00): Sorry, but use of Google imagery and maps is not allowed by Google for use in OSM. It is copyrighted prohibited.
pwbriggs (2026-01-15 19:31:21+00:00): Thanks for responding, https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Brian's%20Automotive%20&%20Performance

You didn't mention Quality Auto Sales-- is that one gone?