piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
wies1 (2023-05-17 13:22:05+00:00): Hallo,
zunächst möchte ich auf folgende Seite hinweisen:

https://osm.zz.de/dbview/?db=landuseoverlap-nrw&layer=overlap#51.43871,8.42311,17z 

Auf osm.zz..de werden u.a. festgestellte Landuseoverlaps angezeigt, aber auch andere, nennen wir es mal Unstimmigkeiten.

Dies war die Grundlage für meine Änderung. Auf der genannten Seite wurde ein Overlap zwischen der Relation (Multipoygon - landuse forest) und dem way getaggt als landuse forest angezeigt.

Soweit ich mich erinnere, ist es doch bei Multipolygonen so, dass die Tags, welche Teil der Outer Linie sind, ins Multipolygon gehören. Die outer Linie ist der way, welcher mit landuse forest gekennzeichnet war. Diesen Tag landuse forest am way habe ich entfernt, denn das Multipolygon wies bereits das Tag landuse forest auf.
Mehr habe ich hier nicht geändert.

Die einzelnen Seiten auf www.osm.zz.de aktualisieren sich alle 7 Tage - d.h. bis morgen kannst du dir die Grundlage auf dieser Seite für meine Änderung noch ansehen.
Den von dir angesprochenen Namen habe ich nicht gesetzt gehabt.
Gruss
wies1
JJIglesias (2023-05-16 19:58:41+00:00): Saludos Andy. Esa plaza en la Calle Ricardo Bacherer, no tiene un nombre conocido?. Cuando traces footways esta muy bien que los conectes a las ways circundantes, pero tambien deben ser conectados al area donde estan incluidas.
Gracias y Saludos
JJ
Ropino (2023-12-09 13:58:30+00:00): Hi,
Bist du dir sicher, dass das Wegstück den Namen "Historische Fährstraße" trägt? Steht da vor Ort ein passendes Schild? Oder ist das nur eine Art Beschreibung was das mal war?
VG
Wandervoran (2023-12-09 18:08:30+00:00): Hallo :)  einen Straßenamen gibt es für diesen Kopfsteinpflasterabschnitt nicht mehr, da es keine offizielle Straße mehr ist. Ein Schild kann dort wegen der Hochwasser nicht aufgestellt werden. Es ist der Name des Objektes mit dem es angesprochen wird. Wie "Alte Markthalle" in der City, nur dass es hier eine Straßenruine in Form eines Weges ist. Würdest du es anders lösen?
Ropino (2023-12-10 14:29:52+00:00): Hi,
Danke für die schnelle Rückmeldung.
Für mich wäre das z.B. mit unter "description" einzutragen,
alternativ eventl. auch als "old_name" oder auch "loc_name"
VG
erickdeoliveiraleal (2024-01-16 23:13:46+00:00): não é track: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/550236259/history
SK53 (2023-05-17 10:37:29+00:00): A Munro top is not a Munro. Whilst it's worth discussing whether munro_top or munro:top=yes or munro=top are sensible tag choices, changing a tag so that the meaning is incorrect doesn't help overmuch.
mueschel (2023-05-17 11:06:08+00:00): You're right, that should be "munro_top", which is already used a few times. 
The original spelling with a space is definitely not a good choice.
I fixed it.
SK53 (2023-05-17 11:23:50+00:00): I've added a short wiki page just to try and cover these somewhat obscure keys: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_of_peak_lists_in_Great_Britain_and_Ireland
user_5359 (2023-05-17 05:57:02+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Sorry for asking: Did you know the difference between post box (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dpost_box) and letter box (see https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dletter_box). Can you please the operator of the post boxes?

Please also a look on https://www.OSM.org/node/234731605. This is a good (negativ) example between description and name of a object. A stop sign doesn‘t have a name.

Please inform your teacher!
literan (2023-05-16 17:36:24+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#%D0%98%D0%BC%D1%8F_-_%D1%8D%D1%82%D0%BE_%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%B8_%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%BA%D0%BE
chris66 (2023-06-02 08:37:44+00:00): Knoten: 10902332243

Was soll barrier=kerb + kerb=no bedeuten?

Grüße
Chris
user_12500175 (2023-06-02 08:49:40+00:00): Hi, das frage ich mich auch gerade....... habs gelöscht.
DressyPear4 (2023-05-16 16:52:45+00:00): Removido, já presente aqui
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/250255623/history
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136171384
felipeeugenio (2023-05-16 15:56:24+00:00): Estimado
Tengo la idea de que usted cree que está anotando las cosas en su teléfono personal, pero la está anotando para todo el mundo.
Y no solo está usando tags equivocados, si no que además esto es algo que simplemente no se agrega a un mapa como OSM.
Si es que no estamos hablando de información privada y/o confidencial que quizás ustedes quieren que nadie vea.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136171427
VIPINDAS K (2023-05-17 11:25:14+00:00): Hello Mapper,
 Please add correct supermarket name.  No need to add name=supermarket.  Name first letter must start with capital letter.
Happy Mapping...

OSM Kerala Community: https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136171870
Dimacn (2023-05-17 03:04:56+00:00): Пожалуйста используйте спутниковые снимки Esri - они более новые, чем Bing, который вы использовали. 2. Пожалуйста выравнивайте спутниковые снимки перед редактированием. Т.к. чаще всего, спутниковые снимки (подложка) смещены и не совпадают с реальным расположением. Объекты могут получиться смещёнными (как получилось в вашей правке). В редакторе iD это делается на закладке "Фоновое изображение" в самом низу - Смещение снимка. Нужно добиться чтобы GPS треки совпадали с дорогами. И уже потом вносить изменения. Вот здесь подробно про это: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Использование_аэрофотоснимков
goaned (2023-05-28 16:36:27+00:00): I do not think this is a good change. The district as such is already relation 1991434 and place=suburb is used for the district's parts like Aspern, Essling, Stadlau; Donaustadt is clearly not the same as those and shouldn't be rendered or treated that way.

I will delete this node again if there are no further comments within the next few days.
JS_Woosmap (2023-05-30 12:56:04+00:00): Hi, thx for this feedback.
My intention was to get Donaustadt visible on the map like other Vienna's districts.
When looking at: 
- Essling (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/455421863), 
- Apsern (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/322276743), 
- Stadlau (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/455421870)
And other districts I tested, they all exist as Node and displayed on the map.
I reproduce same for Donaustadt.
What did I miss?
thx
goaned (2023-05-30 13:01:06+00:00): Essling, Aspern and Stadlau are not districts. They are PARTS of the 22nd district. They shouldn't be shown on the map in the same way as the entire district.

Elsewhere in Vienna too, place=suburb is generally used for parts of districts, not the entire district. What may be confusing is that for most districts, there is a part of the district with the same name as the entire district, e.g. Floridsdorf or Liesing. This isn't true of the 22nd.
JS_Woosmap (2023-05-30 14:33:28+00:00): My bad... totally missed the point.
I focussed on examples you provided instead of actual Vienna's Districts.

Sorry for the confusion on my previous message.

I'm expecting to get the same as for example
-Neubau (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1600676338)
- Favoriten (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/240040885)
- Brigittenau (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/240061130)
- Währing (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/240034416)
Those 4 I tested look to get what I'm expecting.
What's the best way to reproduce that then?
goaned (2023-05-30 14:37:48+00:00): Most districts in Vienna are named after one part of the district.

The nodes you linked to are nodes for the part of the district that happens to be the namesake for the entire district.

Donaustadt is not named after any specific part of the district, so it should not have a node like this.
Luzandro (2023-06-01 06:19:29+00:00): someone added a place=borough for Donaustadt many years ago. I'm not convinced that it's a good idea and the location seems pretty arbitrary for a place node. Don't know if it's actually used anywhere.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/22193310

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place=borough
goaned (2023-06-01 06:23:25+00:00): ok, if there is another place= node for Donaustadt anyway, then I think it is clear that the one added in this changeset should be deleted again. I will do that later if there are no further objections.
evod (2023-06-01 08:31:16+00:00): Luzandro, you can definitely get rid of the borough node I created 9 years ago. The relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1991434 should cover that much better.
goaned (2023-06-08 20:19:33+00:00): I have now removed both nodes with CS 137111371. I will in the near future also go through the place=suburb nodes in Vienna and make sure that their wikidata/wikipedia tags link to the district parts and not the districts themselves so that it is less confusing for future mappers what these are supposed to represent.
JS_Woosmap (2023-06-09 06:37:24+00:00): Thx Goaned
goaned (2023-06-09 22:48:49+00:00): I have now cleaned up the place nodes & done some other things too with CS 137155825
mueschel (2023-05-18 09:54:50+00:00): Hi,
you added the tag "parking:side:access" here - this tag doesn't exist. "side" needs to be replaced with the actual side: left, right or both.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2024-01-17 02:08:08+00:00): não é track: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/790428001
27sur26 (2023-05-16 23:25:42+00:00): Bienvenida ¡Muchas gracias por mejorar OSM!
user_6110846 (2023-05-16 15:12:44+00:00): гетьманська замінено на Чапаєва бо у рішенні вулиця Чапаєва перейменовано двічі на гетьманську і  на івана богуна
022 (2023-07-09 20:50:06+00:00): Is this correct mapping practice? This is a 2-storey parking garage, so I had previously marked two roads with the above ones tagged as layer=1. I'm not sure if it's appropriate to merge both upper floor and lower floor into a single way. At least, that's what I understood from the wiki. Cheers
Aleg Surta (2023-07-11 15:07:03+00:00): Hello eric710,

Thank you for your attention to our edits! I found your advises very helpful and you can check out the result via changeset 138384712.  

Regards,
Aleg_Surta_Mapbox
ccamara (2023-05-24 21:09:52+00:00): Hola, veig que has canviat el tipus d'artwork de "architecture" a "arquitectura_modernista". Donat que A) el valor de les etiquetes es en anglès i que el valor posat està en català i és molt específic, considero que hauria de tornar a ser architecture, a no ser que hi hagi raons que se m'escapen.
lipuma (2023-05-17 09:48:04+00:00): Hi, I see you created a building around existing buildings here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1173395479

This is not correct, now this whole place renders as a giant building, with other buildings inside the building. Maybe you can make the existing buildings more details with tags?
NorthCrab_upload (2023-05-16 15:40:14+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1173395709

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
trigpoint (2023-11-16 17:21:59+00:00): Again what sources are you using for these edits?

In this edit you have changed https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/117883015 from 30 mph to 40 mph which now contradicts signage visible in open sources.

Why have you made this change?

Cheers Phil
trigpoint (2023-11-23 10:02:38+00:00): No response after a week so reverting this edit.
user_5359 (2023-05-17 05:44:00+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Are you part of group learning GIS? You can see on the map, that you paint a building over existing buildings. Also notice „Town home“ is a description not a name of the building.
Javierpf (2023-05-23 13:36:28+00:00): Hello! Thank you for the updates. In the future, please split your changesets into smaller ones by specific geographic areas such as countries, provinces, etc. Examples:
you are adding/modifying 10 objects in 2 distant cities => make 2 changesets, 1 per city.
you are adding/modifying 5 objects in 5 countries => make 5 changesets, 1 per country.
Some relevant reading material: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
eggie (2023-05-16 16:35:37+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback  Wanneer er al een adresnode is hoeft niet het adres nogmaals op het gebouw.
Voor de bijnaam kun je gebruiken loc_name=..... ipv description. 
name=Kempkensberg  staat overiges al op de buitenste polygoon.
'k Denk een keuze maken.


MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
martiensch (2024-03-25 18:24:51+00:00): En roken is trouwens geheel verboden op het terrein. De rokers staan allemaal in het bos.
rskedgell (2023-05-16 16:33:32+00:00): Thank you!
skyper (2023-05-17 12:18:54+00:00): Hallo Steffen,
woher hast Du denn den Wert der Höhe des Gebäudes? Bei Schätzungen wäre `est_height` oder zumindest `source:height=estimated` sinnvoll. Anstatt Daten zu manipulieren ("taggen für den Renderer") sollte die auswertende Software angepasst werden. Siehe auch z.B. https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/streets-gl-a-new-3d-renderer-for-osm
Fragende Grüße,
skyper
ALu68 (2023-05-17 09:16:06+00:00): Das sind doch auch Phantasienamen:

* Dammkronenweg
*  Gewässerzufahrt
* Hochwasserschutzdamm
* Schutzmauer

https://thueringenviewer.thueringen.de/thviewer/?Map/layerIds=10001005,10105002&visibility=true,true&transparency=0,0&Map/center=[587120.62287651,5650565.608045527]&Map/zoomLevel=9
DrSegatron (2023-05-16 19:07:42+00:00): Your waste basket seems to have taken a vacation!
Velosoph (2023-05-16 19:35:16+00:00): Oops... don't know what happened here. I used OsmAnd for adding some items but of course didn't deliberately add a waste basket inmidst the ocean. Feel free to delete this node (or I will do it later this week as I'm currently a little limited). Thanks for the hint.
MaciekMma (2023-05-16 19:43:51+00:00): seems legit
Velosoph (2023-05-19 05:49:53+00:00): I have deleted this object now. Still no idea how this could happen. A finger slip on my smartphone? A bug in OsmAnd?
SomeoneElse (2023-05-16 17:17:38+00:00): Please, using meaningful changeset comments.  Assuming that "#EGY" here actually means "Egypt", why not use that one extra character and have people understand what you mean, as opposed to not doing and leaving them guessing?
SomeoneElse (2023-05-16 17:18:27+00:00): (although how "Egypt" is relevant to a change in Oman I have no idea)
Seandebasti (2023-05-25 06:04:17+00:00): you are right. I should drop it. mistakes we all do. its humanic. right?
rik_ (2023-05-16 18:00:20+00:00): Hallo Wetterauer,

ist das üblich, die URL bei jedem einzelnen Node der Strecke zu hinterlegen? 

Ich bin bisher der Meinung, dass sich das ohne hundertfache Duplikation viel einfacher an der Relation machen lässt. 

Gibt's hierzu Meinungen/Dokumentation?

Viele Grüße

rik
Wetterauer (2023-05-16 18:31:41+00:00): Hi, rik

ich habe nur die vorhandene Web-Adresse auf "https" geändert, da die eingestellte zu Warnungen im Browser führten. Ich hatte mich auch gefragt, ob die an den WAYs tatsächlich nötig sind. Aber da die schon seit 2011 drin sind und ich i.d.R nichts lösche was andere gemappt haben, habe ich sie drin gelassen.

Viele Grüße
Uwe
rik_ (2023-05-16 19:20:10+00:00): Hi Uwe, dann muss ich um Verzeihung für die Störung bitten - ich hatte nicht auf den ersten Blick gesehen, dass es nur eine Änderung war. 

Viele Grüße, rik
Glassman (2023-05-18 02:23:28+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

A tag is needed to define Pat's Prairie area. I'm happy to help if you can tell me what type of area this is. It looks like possible wetlands but i'm not sure.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136178489
user_5359 (2023-05-17 05:38:21+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You remove also a building and an address. Is the building also destroyed?
joost schouppe (2023-05-17 10:22:02+00:00): Hi Arflha,
Not all municpalities were affected in 1977, and several have been updated later. Just adding 1977 to all of them introduces quite a few mistakes.
Arflha (2023-05-18 10:36:44+00:00): Hi,
Are there towns/cities tagged start-date=1977-01-01 which shouldn't ?

If so I'll correct this right away.
joost schouppe (2023-05-22 09:58:30+00:00): Well it's up to you to only introduce correct data... It's better not to map this than it is to not really know but still add it. Anyway, the ones I know about without further research is that Stad Antwerpen only followed in 1983 or so, and here's a list of the 2019 fusions in Flanders: https://www.vlaanderen.be/lokaal-bestuur/samenwerking-fusies-regiovorming-en-verzelfstandiging/gemeentefusies-2014-2019
Arflha (2023-05-22 10:45:31+00:00): Thanks for the info on the 2019 merger, I'm correcting that right away, Antwerp and RBC/BHG have not been changed.

Oudsbergen - was unchanged.
Kruisem - corrected.
Aalter - corrected.
Pelt - was unchanged, admin_center changed from Neerpelt to Pelt.
Deinze - corrected.
Puurs-Sint-Amands - fixed, admin_centre changed from Puurs to Puurs-Sint-Amands.
Lievegem - fixed, admin_centre changed from Zomergem to Lievegem.
wille (2023-05-16 19:32:11+00:00): Olá, Rodrigo

Muito obrigado por suas contribuições ao OpenStreetMap! Não colocamos nomes genéricos, como "Dunas". 

Caso tenha alguma dúvida, pode entrar em contato comigo.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136179645
Rodrigo Maia Nogueira (2023-05-16 19:53:47+00:00): Olá,

Sem problemas, eu coloquei justamente porque achei "areia" ainda mias genérico e coloquei "duna" porque é na verdade a caracterização do tipo de ambiente.
Glassman (2023-05-18 02:22:03+00:00): A couple of points. First Gabby's Java could be drawn as a building with information about the coffee shop within. The other areas look like parking but I'm not sure from the imagery. Can you look at Gabby's again?

Second, Sunny Farms looks like it already tagged. I would recommend removing your node since the existing one has complete information. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/572091845
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136179689
cartofy (2023-05-17 09:59:18+00:00): Hello! Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. When you add buildings to the map, make sure you map them at the footprint (base) of the building, and not the walls of the building. Take a look at: https://learnosm.org/en/hot-tips/tracing-rectangular-buildings/

Please correct the outline, and feel free to reach out if you have any questions. 

Happy mapping!
cartofy (2023-05-18 05:24:23+00:00): I have fixed this in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136236731. Please be careful going forward.
wolfbert (2023-05-16 20:39:24+00:00): way 530980458: name=Fussballplatz ist kein Name (z.B. "Ernst Happel-Stadion") sondern eine Kategorie, und die steckt schon in pitch + soccer. Ist also zu löschen. War vorher auch schon falsch.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136179892
wolfbert (2023-05-16 21:03:40+00:00): crossing=marked + crossing:markings=yes ist redundant. Besser wäre crossing:markings=zebra (wenn's stimmt; wobei das in Österreich der Default-Wert ist). Vorsicht bei Radwegen, die haben andere Markierungen.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136179892
cartofy (2023-05-17 10:10:36+00:00): I'm assuming you want to map a pool. The tags you've used are incorrect, unfortunately. The OSM wiki describes tags that you can use to map different types of objects. The correct tag to use over here is leisure=swimming_pool. Since the individual pools are a part of the apartment complex, they need not have a name of their own. You can define which pool is used by adults, and which ones are for children by adding custom access tags, for example: access=adults, access=children. 

I have made these changes for you in this changeset, so that you can use it for future reference: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136205369
wkdgs (2023-05-17 08:37:49+00:00): Hi,

hier wäre es besser die Informationen, die sich auf die Praxis beziehen nicht am Gebäude selbst einzutragen, sondern dafür einen eigenen, neuen Punkt innerhalb des Gebäudes anzulegen. Insbesondere, wenn das Gebäude noch anderweitig genutzt wird, z.B. durch Wohnungen über der Praxis.

Es wäre auch sinnvoll weitere Tags hinzuzufügen, die genauer beschreiben, was für eine Praxis hier gemappt ist, damit die Praxis bei einer Suche gefunden werden kann.

Hier würde sich wahrscheinlich "healthcare=alternative" anbieten:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:healthcare%3Dalternative
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136180816
wolfbert (2023-05-16 21:38:50+00:00): way 279417714: crossing=unknown ist veraltet und wenig hilfreich. Besser weglassen. Die Übergänge an dieser Kreuzung wurden verlegt, Markierungen sind rot/weiß. Siehe dazu Wiki zu crossing:markings und Diskussion https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/tagging-von-fussgangeruberwegen/7868.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136180857
Jordi MF (2023-05-16 20:36:23+00:00): Hola MikelCalo,
Per què has esborrat els edificis que es van importar del Cadastre? Per exemple, este: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/787898546/history

Crec que no és la primera vegada que et passa. Fa temps, l'usuari "editemapes" t'ho va comentar: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/87364816

La importació del Cadastre aporta molta més informació que si mapeges a mà els edificis ja que aporta les diferents part de què consta l'edifici amb totes les seues altures corresponents.

De normal no m'atreviria a revertir el changeset perquè has canviat altres coses correctament, però s'ha perdut informació molt valuosa que és molt costós de recuperar perquè és molt difícil de trobar l'àrea en la que es van importar tots estos edificis. Per tant, revertiré esta part i intentaré conservar el que puga de les altres edicions.
Seria una pena perdre més informació de la importació que es va fer del Cadastre (i que encara es fa, tot i que "editemapes" ni jo li podem dedicar tant de temps com abans).

Salutacions,
Jordi
MarkusHD (2023-05-16 18:17:29+00:00): nördlichsten Bahnübergang im Wald genauer, Fußweg entlang Spur im Umlaufgitter gezeichnet, Fahrweg gesperrt
willkmis (2023-05-21 05:06:08+00:00): Hey Joseph,
It looks like in this change you changed a lot of the giant natural=desert polygons around the Mojave to natural=sand. Can you say a little on why you think natural=sand is a good tag for these areas? I think that natural=desert certainly isn't well defined, but natural=sand doesn't seem like it's always right for these areas either to me. A lot of these "deserts" are covered in scrub or other plants. In fact, the Mojave Desert polygon you retagged overlaps with a tagged natural=scrub area: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/934058828), but you can certainly see it if you zoom in to e.g. the Lanfair Valley (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/165774302). I find that retagging these vast, often vegetated landscapes as sand weakens the tag meaning and obscures the actually sandy areas, like Kelso Dunes (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/61011696). IMO, some of these might best be tagged as some kind of place=*, or maybe natural=valley.
Best,
Will