piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
sampeto (2023-08-26 12:23:34+00:00): Hello Zorschis and welcome on OpenStreetMap

Thank you for adding the charging station. Please have a look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dcharge_point
and
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station

There you'll find the correct taging scheme for a charging station.
If you have fourther questions, don't hesitate to ask on the swiss osm mailing list: http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/mailman3/lists/talk-ch.openstreetmap.ch/

Greetings, sampeto
eggie (2023-08-26 07:01:33+00:00): Dag Koen... Het is niet gebruikelijk om oneway=no toe te voegen aan reguliere wegen.
Denk dat StreetComplete je op het verkeerde been zet.
MVG
eggie
koensadza (2023-08-26 11:05:48+00:00): Hoi Eggie, dat was inderdaad een quest in StreetComplete. Zal deze vragen uitschakelen dan. Fijn weekend
Warin61 (2023-08-26 23:43:59+00:00): Hi
Under 'Public Transport version 2' routes ... the stops must be in the correct order from 'start' to 'finish' .. the same order as the ways are. 

As such the introduction of the stop/platform 'Parramatta North Carpark' is not in the correct order.

I leave this for you to fix. 
See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=151.02207&lat=-33.80826&zoom=17&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=ptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes%2Cptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-28 16:38:36+00:00): confirmed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3854000
martien-176 (2023-08-26 17:47:08+00:00): Hi,  thanks for mapping. You requested a review of your mappings. 

Your buildings are well mapped. Good location, square corners and precise outline. 

Thanks and regards, Martien, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140397895
Kovoschiz (2023-08-30 23:24:41+00:00): Please don't change `=unclassified` . `=residential` should at most be used for local streets.
Warin61 (2023-08-26 23:35:11+00:00): Hi,
Way 1202238830 for building house is 'not very good' ... 
First the JOSM validator would have given you a warning that 2 nodes were duplicates of each other. 

See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=149.62249&lat=-33.44073&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

These can be merged into one node without loss of data. 
Second the DCS Imagery would have given you better imagery to better map the house. 

I leave this for you to look at.
welzheimerwald (2023-08-26 19:02:51+00:00): Hallo lberges,

wie ich sehe, hast du die PLZ-Grenze zwischen Ober- und Mittelfischbach verlegt. Da ich die Gegend kenne, finde ich diese Lösung sehr plausibel: Mittel- und Unterfischbach liegen beide am Talhang des dem Murrtal zugewandten Fischbachtals, während Oberfischbach auf der Hochfläche einfacher vom Hauptort Großerlach zu erreichen ist. Die Gemeinde schreibt jedoch auf ihrer Homepage, dass auch Oberfischbach im PLZ-Bereich 71560 liegt (siehe https://www.grosserlach.de/de/gemeinde-wirtschaft/zahlen-daten/statistische-daten).

Hast du für deine Annahme eine Quelle? Würde mich wirklich brennend interessieren. Man findet zu den PLZ-Grenzen leider nichts öffentlich-offizielles.

Viele Grüße
welzheimerwald
lberges (2023-09-01 10:46:36+00:00): Das ist der letzte Stand bei der Post: https://www.postdirekt.de/plzserver/.
Dort ist Oberfischbach nur 71577, während für Mittel- und Unterfischbach weiterhin 71560 (also Sulzbach) und auch 71577 angegeben ist. Mann kann also für Mittel- und Unterfischbach inzwischen auch die 71577 verwenden, während für Oberfischbach die 71560  nicht mehr gültig ist. Die Info der Gemeinde ist wohl veraltet. (Alles ohne Gewähr, auch die Post hat Fehler in ihren Daten). Ich ändere jetzt nichts, weil es, wie Du richtig sagt, so plausibel ist.
welzheimerwald (2023-09-02 17:09:27+00:00): Danke für deine Antwort. Im Mapserver (Kartendarstellung auf postdirekt.de/plzserver/, ist bissle versteckt) sind übrigens alle Fischbachs im 71577-Polygon enthalten. Dass es überlappende PLZ gibt, ist wohl auch so ein Deutsche-Post-Dingens ... Naja, manchmal denke ich echt, dass es damals ein Fehler war, unser eigenständiges württembergisches Postwesen aufzugeben :-P
lberges (2023-09-02 19:10:51+00:00): Ja, die Karten werden spät oder nie aktualisiert. Ansonsten ist Mittelfischbach wie Steinächle: Es gibt eine "alte" Nummer (wg. Zustellung vom Nachbarort), und man kann jetzt auch die PLZ der Gemeinde verwenden. Habe auch Beispiele aus Schleswig-Holstein, ist nicht auf Ba-Wü beschränkt.
Igor Bubelov (2024-08-29 03:20:06+00:00): Hi! Does this place still exist and accept bitcoins?
NorthCrab_upload (2023-08-26 07:30:18+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10888899099
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1202241475

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
喵耳引力波 (2023-09-04 11:05:12+00:00): 如果在青岛和南通分别做了修改，建议分成两个变更集保存，不然会是一个非常非常大的框横跨在黄海上
aceman444 (2024-12-23 18:51:03+00:00): Hej, cize z Ortofoto, kde tieto objekty ani nie su vidiet, viete, ze to nie su diela, ale akesi atrakcie, samozrejme bez uvedenia typu (attraction). No ako obycajne.
Domitia Habitat (2023-11-03 07:51:51+00:00): Bonjour,

Je te contact concernant le nom de l'opérateur du réseau de transport en commun de l'agglo "Le Grand Narbonne"

Le véritable nom est "Keolis Aude" appartenant à l'entité "Keolis Sud de France".
Je vais effectuer les corrections sur l'ensemble des relations.
Je t'écris donc pour éviter un malentendu sur le nom de l'opérateur ;-)
voltairovicz (2023-08-26 09:13:23+00:00): Dzięki za zmianę ;)
user_17222985 (2023-08-26 09:21:36+00:00): I cancel on the basis that the translation of Kyiv is called On the Ground and the proof of the existence of the translation is the French Wikipedia

Write in DWG. No one canceled the "on the ground" rule
user_17222985 (2023-08-26 09:30:45+00:00): The discussion 4 years ago is not an argument now because a lot of time has passed and the situation has changed

show me the rule of the openstreetmap project, which says that the French wikipedia cannot be a source of translation
The RedBurn (2023-08-26 10:04:15+00:00): "Name on the ground" isn't the rule for translated names as per DWG, and it has to be the main name in the French Wikipedia, which it isn't.
Taya_S (2023-08-26 10:18:07+00:00): Could you list a source for that random rule?
user_18023081 (2023-08-26 10:26:09+00:00): Literally no French speaker (including me) calls it "Kyiv" instead of "Kiev"
muchichka_s (2023-08-26 10:31:08+00:00): I don't have a final opinion on this. But I will add that Wikipedia is a weak argument, because just as here, anyone can change the name there. 

From my point of view, the French language is decentralized (just like English) unlike Ukrainian. It is spoken by many people in different countries. These are France, Québec and many other countries in Africa. Therefore, it is necessary to look at the practice of application everywhere and not only in France. I don't know how Kyiv is usually written in France, but in Canadian French-speaking resources the name "Kyïv/Kyiv" is commonly used
user_17222985 (2023-08-26 10:40:40+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Map_what's_on_the_ground   
section Map what's on the ground

In the article "disputed names" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Disputes section  On the Ground Rule
The RedBurn (2023-08-26 10:46:34+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/64937230#c340010
and
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/64937230#c340020
for the response of the DWG (data working group)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/SomeoneElse is a member
The RedBurn (2023-08-26 11:00:23+00:00): About the Wikipedia argument, the article title rule for the French Wikipedia is to use the most commonly used name as title. Also known as "principle of least astonishment".
https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikip%C3%A9dia:Conventions_sur_les_titres
user_17222985 (2023-08-27 10:00:28+00:00): @The RedBurn in the openstreammap project, the frequency of using translation is not at all important.
The proof of the existence of translation as such is already sufficient. The essence of the allpenstreetmap project is to have local names in name and not names from some little-known databases. During the discussion, you want to push us all to forget about the main rule of the project. Sorry, but it won't. Look for arguments that fit within the  rule on the ground

A link to a discussion 4 years ago is not an argument at all.

Then 4 years ago in the French Wikipedia there was only a translation of Kiev
Now the circumstances have changed and we proceed from new circumstances, namely the fact that the translation of Kyiv is in the French Wikipedia.
The RedBurn (2023-08-27 10:46:00+00:00): If you don't agree with the decision on this matter by the DWG, feel free to contact them.
muchichka_s (2023-08-27 11:10:02+00:00): If we read more carefully the DWG decision, it was tied to time, not absolute. Again, this does not mean that I am in favor of changing the name. I'm just saying that it can be reviewed now or later or newer and it won't contradict the decision itself
MxxCon (2023-08-27 03:00:45+00:00): Hello.
Please stop vandalizing the map! This the location name of this feature is already tagged in branch= tag!
If you continue to make these incorrect edits and ignore my comments your account will be referred to DWG, which can result in account block or even ban.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140400308
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2023-12-21 16:49:02+00:00): For motorhome/camping car sites we use the tourism=caravan_site tag. When like here it is only for camping cars, it should be tagged with caravans=no. I have updated the site.
empty_child (2023-08-26 09:56:52+00:00): Hello elby,
Please, don't add generic names like "Market", correct tag is enough
gszkr (2026-07-06 13:55:30+00:00): Skad pomysł na chodniki po południowej stronie Cechowej, któych tam nie ma?
user_5359 (2023-08-26 14:39:14+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please check your keys. A street has no address (did you mean is_in), has no PIN (did you mean postal_code), etc.
johnny_1982 (2023-12-30 14:51:16+00:00): Telefon steht immer noch.
Claudius Henrichs (2024-01-28 20:02:47+00:00): Stand allerdings nicht da, als ich vor 5 Monaten dort vorbei lief.
Wenn für dich das wiederherstellen zu kompliziert ist, kann ich das gerne übernehmen. Soll ich?
johnny_1982 (2024-01-29 22:46:56+00:00): Habe bereits ein disused:amenity=telephone an dieser Stelle eingefügt.
Awoobis (2023-09-03 14:02:15+00:00): Przypadkowo stworzyłeś budynek w formie multipolygonu - była dodatkowa linia i schowała się w konturze budynku. Poprawiłem. https://www.osm.org/changeset/140760460

Żabkę też dodałem
BrowarBiz (2023-09-04 18:08:39+00:00): Dzięki za pomoc!
silversurfer83 (2023-08-26 11:17:55+00:00): Hi there :)

interesting project. Looks like some work ahead of you.

One thing: Please don't add the house number as "name=" to a building outline. There's usually only one place with a particular adress.
Refer to 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses
and
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen

happy mapping
silversurfer83
Kovoschiz (2023-08-30 23:27:43+00:00): Please don't add descriptor labels to `name=`
marc__marc (2026-02-21 19:40:54+00:00): Hello,
what did you mean with camp_site=CRPF on a camping_site ?
it's the operator ?
is CRPF bada playground a true name or a description ?
Regards,
Marc
Growebis (2023-08-26 09:10:06+00:00): I accidently used a previous description
What actually changed was i just added 2 brownfields
Kovoschiz (2023-08-30 23:28:18+00:00): `name=` should be proper names  only. Don't add descriptor labels,.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-08-26 09:21:45+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 136904876, 137275720, 140375198.
Seraq (2023-09-06 08:35:07+00:00): Hola Monchinho,
He visto que has cambiado el nombre de la calle. ¿Podrías decirme que fuente utilizas para apoyar tus cambios?
De esta manera las puedo tener en cuenta en próximas actualizaciones de la zona y estar coordinados...


Muchas gracias,

Seraq
Monchinho (2023-09-06 09:35:25+00:00): ¡Hola Seraq!

La principal fuente es la oral. Nadie dice "Rua Arriba", por ejemplo, sino Rúa de Arriba. Pero más allá de eso, que para mí ya es más que definitorio, puedes encontrar múltiples documentos donde ponen la preposición "de" en las calles. Por ejemplo, ayer cambié "Travesía do Flaire". Nadie dice "Travesía Flaire", no tiene sentido. Con Arou pasa lo mismo. Y, por citar un ejemplo de documentación, en este PDF del BOE aparece Punta Percebeira SL "C/ DO FLAIRE 63 - CAMELLE (CAMARIÑAS)."

https://www.boe.es/borme/dias/2022/05/23/pdfs/BORME-A-2022-96-15.pdf

https://www.paxinasgalegas.es/casa-da-alta-651714em.html

Otros ejemplos, Rúa das Rozas, en la página web del ayuntamiento:

"Rua da Eirexa. 31. 4. -I+I. I. 33. Er. 42.66 Pr. I. Mb. 26. Cob. II. Rua das Rozas".

Con esto quiero decirte que no te puedes fiar de unas placas puestas en rigor a sabe Dios qué, como he comentado en otro hilo de cambios. 

Saludos.
moje_konto (2023-08-26 20:48:07+00:00): Chcąc poprawić pozycję powinno się obiekt tylko przesunąć, by pozostały wszystkie dane i historia.

Przywróciłem stary punkt, zachowując nową pozycję.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-08-30 02:47:16+00:00): Reverted by DWG due to poor quality mapping

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140566130
Kovoschiz (2023-08-30 23:34:03+00:00): Please pay attention that no donation occurs here. This doesn't reflect its function.
Kovoschiz (2023-08-30 23:35:13+00:00): 2. This should not be said as under the Red Cross. It is for HK and HA.
Kovoschiz (2023-08-30 23:37:05+00:00): 2. Its management is irrelevant to Red Cross.
Kovoschiz (2023-08-30 23:53:44+00:00): 3. Please don't use `building=hospital` for something that's not a hospital.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-10-12 05:34:37+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/897505195 jest planowane czy w budowie?
eggie (2023-08-26 10:28:40+00:00): Dag Tom.. Je vraagt feedback. Lijkt me oke zo.
Mvg
eggie
silversurfer83 (2023-08-26 11:23:11+00:00): Hi there :)

you asked for review. Here it comes:
The tagging looks ok. What I miss about the edit is a source for your information. Maybe add that in future change set comments.
Also, here's the wiki page on cave entrances, if you haven't yet seen it. Maybe you can fill in some more information, should you have it:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dcave_entrance

happy mapping
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140404061
azakh-world (2023-08-30 09:14:15+00:00): Hello.
You shouldn't create a separate stop_area relation at a station for all routes passing the station. I speak about Goksan, Pungsan stations and others. This is normal when multiple lines share stop_areas.

Best regards,
Alexey
Warin61 (2023-09-16 07:56:04+00:00): The playground is best left as a separate entry. Leisure=playground:pitch does not 'make sense' in OSM terms. The OSM guide is 'one feature = one OSM entry'. 

I have attempted to detail the area. There may be toilets and a bubbler here that are not mapped.
dangaz (2023-09-16 12:52:34+00:00): Fair no problem, I only had it like this as the park itself is 'Mount Evelyn Skate Park and Playground' as one entity, it does work better as individual segments though. I will put the carpark back in though.
Warin61 (2023-09-17 08:12:58+00:00): Possibly a site relation with that name with each feature are a member? Or a landuse=recreation_ground with that name? More than one way to skin a cat.
BCNorwich (2023-08-28 07:07:18+00:00): Reverted to re-align many dragged highways
silversurfer83 (2023-08-26 11:25:24+00:00): Moin Dietmar :)

herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap

kleine Frage: Du hast hier den Wert "heigth=" (Höhe), der sich auf die Höhe (oder auch Größe) des Objekts in Metern bezieht, mit "192" angegeben. Das bedeutet, dass dieses Wohnhaus 192m hoch ist. Das ist ziemlich viel.
Meinst du vielleicht etwas anderes?

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140404725
Yog Sot (2023-08-27 19:39:21+00:00): dobra robota ^.x
Sammyhawkrad (2023-08-26 11:29:01+00:00): The changes made in this changeset is incorrect and has been reverted with this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140407421
Fizzie-DWG (2023-08-30 05:01:09+00:00): Reverted by DWG due to poor quality mapping

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140568549
mariotomo (2023-08-28 14:08:03+00:00): hola. saludos cordiales, puedes indicar cómo se llega a este punto? o se trata del puente mismo, que es muy panorámico?
Langlaeufer (2023-08-26 12:52:25+00:00): Hallo Leonard.
bitte mit access-tags sparsam sein. Bei einem Fußweg wird angenommen, dass dort nur Fußgänger gehen dürfen. Insofern ist alles andere überflüssig.
access=yes gibt einen Weg für alle Verkehrsmodi frei. Hier hast du dann zwar diverses wieder ausgeschlossen aber dabei vergisst man schnell mal was. Grüße und weiterhin frohes mappen. Langläufer
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140406003
BCNorwich (2023-08-28 06:50:52+00:00): Roads dragged out of alignment, so I've reverted the changeset.

Regards Bernard.
map per (2023-08-27 07:05:09+00:00): Wegen review_requested:
Danke für den Eintrag, hab noch office=publisher als Kathegorie eingetragen.

Viele Grüße
map per
BCNorwich (2023-08-28 06:58:51+00:00): Hi, Land use should be mapped as areas, not nodes. Thus these nodes are meaningless. The nodes should be removed and the areas should be mapped.

Regards Bernard.

Regards Bernard.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-07-02 13:21:11+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11145985418/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
SekeRob (2023-08-28 11:47:38+00:00): If you like dragging nodes around moving objects aligned to one set of imagery to another set of imagery you may, whether it adds is in the eye of the beholder. Just don't leave things broken like your previous edit here. Now the ways and gate you added analysis as... broken. Here your gate tags don't match that what's tagged on the service way (which is not oneway for everyone), something you do frequently, same as not adding direction on stop spots, traffic signals and so on, and parking areas that are not connected to a way directly need to be qualified too in some way so routers can get a way to them.
I don't follow you around, the QA progs I look at daily do, every single day and lead me to 'fix' those thing, but now there's that series of broken turns on the motorway you marked as WIP. It's better to not edit on thing onto any road that affects driver decisions finish them or leave them off if you don't know how.
So if you do things do it DIRFT and follow up with the QA reports. I make mistakes daily but I fix them no later the next day. Some run every 12 hours, some daily.

caio
damianeue (2023-08-28 12:25:35+00:00): Believe my, my alignments are correct; I studied the gpx data and I can assure you this is very close to perfection. I'm not only aligning but also smoothing curves, which is actually one of the reasons I started this work.
About the gate you mentioned: which one do you refer to? I believe you mean https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11144108512, but as you can see from Bing imagery it is a oneway street
Yes I know, sometimes I don't add direction tags because I primarily use JOSM, I prefer to add those tags using iD and in fact I do a double work (release an edit and then check which problems weren't flagged by JOSM).
About the parking areas: you're right, but routers will anyway give you directions to the most close point, which most of the time is correct (also: mapping for routing is a difficult subject, the main opinion is to avoid it)
About the broken turns: can you link me them? So I can exactly see what I did and understand and avoid to do the same mistake again

Lastly, about the revert: if you notice a mistake, or that I accidentally broke something (in the changeset you reverted for example I was fixing the fact I broke Torre del Cerrano Est relation, that's why I was really pissed off), please comment something like "hey this [...] looks like a mistake to me" and I'll look into it.

Thank you
L'imaginaire (2024-04-04 20:49:20+00:00): The address of this restaurant is about 250 meters to the east of where you mapped it. I've moved it to the correct location.
Ropino (2023-09-28 10:33:36+00:00): Hi,
warum hast du erneut class zu highway gemacht?
siehe CS:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117165141
Nur weil osmose irgendwas anzeigt, muss der Vorschlag zur Änderung nicht sinnvoll sein.
VG
Herwescheluc (2023-09-28 13:00:57+00:00): Halo ropino!
Pure Schusseligkeit! - Hab's revidiert...
Sorry!
Andreas
user_18023081 (2025-06-02 17:25:57+00:00): Why did you cut off buildings????
user_18023081 (2025-06-02 17:32:59+00:00): Could you please square up the buildings near your task boundary
BCNorwich (2023-08-28 06:55:53+00:00): Hi Many roads are dragged out of alignment and many road sections are duplicated. As this disrupts routing I've reverted the changeset.

Regards Bernard.
literan (2023-08-28 19:30:26+00:00): уже есть, внесли дубль
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12024674
moje_konto (2023-08-26 15:54:11+00:00): Usunięto znaczniki sklepu Candy Cat świat słodyczy - jakie źródło, że został trwale zlikwidowany?
Fizzie-DWG (2023-08-30 02:47:17+00:00): Reverted by DWG due to poor quality mapping

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140566130
silversurfer83 (2023-08-26 16:44:20+00:00): Hi there :)

with this change you took all ways out of the square. Now no routing service will be able to route bike or foot traffic across. Maybe connect the ways with some paths?

cheers
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140409464
a14711 (2023-08-27 09:39:48+00:00): Hi,

is there another way to do this, ex. tag the place in some way that it is allowed to pass by bike?

In real life it is simply a flat place. no ways visible.

a14711
silversurfer83 (2023-08-27 11:18:34+00:00): I understand the problem.
This is one of the rare cases where we'll simply put a connecting way in place just to make sure routing will work.

silversurfer83
a14711 (2023-09-01 15:12:53+00:00): i made a another update to the object to address the issue for bikes
silversurfer83 (2023-09-01 15:22:44+00:00): The change is OK but it doesn't address the problem. 
The problem is: a lot of software that uses our data isn't able to route across areas. That's why we add ways through pedestrian areas. 
Simply connect the ways that go to the area with each other with a short "highway=path" and all is well
ygcgjp5 (2023-08-30 13:33:58+00:00): tarpas paliktas specialiai ar netyčia?
Aidas Kasparas (2023-08-30 13:57:51+00:00): Netyčia. Jau pataisiau.
Ačiū už pastebėjimą!
Polyglot (2023-08-26 13:31:43+00:00): Bedankt, ik was er vol goede moed aan begonnen tijdens middagpauze, maar gisteren niet meer aan toegekomen