piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
bxl-forever (2024-10-24 09:08:13+00:00): Sorry but you’ve just created an invalid structure: your inner polygons overlap each other.
Please draw a new outline of the entire "inner" part and use only that.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-10-23 18:31:00+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/942549769

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2024-10-23 18:31:01+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/942552106

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
CurlingMan13 (2024-10-24 05:02:55+00:00): Hello.  You have requested a review by checking the box upon changeset submission.

I have reviewed your changeset and have found it to be in good quality.

You can also do multiple buildings in one changeset.  I usually do about 5-10minutes of mapping before saving, or before changing areas.

Keep up the good work!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158266464
pitscheplatsch (2024-10-23 18:35:49+00:00): Hi Sabitu, again welcome to OSM.

Thank you for adding so many POIs. I have a question about the assigned names: Does it really make sense to use this time only uppercases?

I look forward to hearing back from you.

Thank you very much.
CurlingMan13 (2024-10-24 05:01:43+00:00): Hello.  You have requested a review by checking the box upon changeset submission.

I have reviewed your changeset and have found it to be in good quality.

You can also do multiple buildings in one changeset.  I usually do about 5-10minutes of mapping before saving, or before changing areas.

Keep up the good work!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158266496
CurlingMan13 (2024-10-24 05:02:19+00:00): Hello.  You have requested a review by checking the box upon changeset submission.

I have reviewed your changeset and have found it to be in good quality.

You can also do multiple buildings in one changeset.  I usually do about 5-10minutes of mapping before saving, or before changing areas.

Keep up the good work!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158266551
CurlingMan13 (2024-10-24 05:02:36+00:00): Hello.  You have requested a review by checking the box upon changeset submission.

I have reviewed your changeset and have found it to be in good quality.

You can also do multiple buildings in one changeset.  I usually do about 5-10minutes of mapping before saving, or before changing areas.

Keep up the good work!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158266612
pancitpigeon (2024-10-23 20:11:45+00:00): Hi, it appears you have added descriptions of where driveways lead using the 'name=' tag. Names should not be used for this purpose, for more information please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
pitscheplatsch (2024-10-23 18:36:05+00:00): Hi Sabitu, again welcome to OSM.

Thank you for adding so many POIs. I have a question about the assigned names: Does it really make sense to use this time only uppercases?

I look forward to hearing back from you.

Thank you very much.
pitscheplatsch (2024-10-23 18:36:16+00:00): Hi Sabitu, again welcome to OSM.

Thank you for adding so many POIs. I have a question about the assigned names: Does it really make sense to use this time only uppercases?

I look forward to hearing back from you.

Thank you very much.
CurlingMan13 (2024-10-24 05:00:22+00:00): don't forget to square the houses.

Keep in mind aerial imagery isn't perfectly straight down, so it is normal for the roof to appear with a corner, even though it is straight.  Take a look at the house furthest to the west (left side of screen).  That west wall is straight, and should be mapped as straight, even if the aerial imagery shows something slightly different.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158266809
CurlingMan13 (2024-10-24 04:56:36+00:00): Hello.  You have requested a review by checking the box upon changeset submission.

I have reviewed your changeset and have found it to be in good quality.

You can also do multiple buildings in one changeset.  I usually do about 5-10minutes of mapping before saving, or before changing areas.

Keep up the good work!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158266827
CurlingMan13 (2024-10-24 04:52:52+00:00): Hello.  You have requested a review by checking the box upon changeset submission.

I have reviewed your changeset and have found it to be in good quality.

You can also do multiple buildings in one changeset.  I usually do about 5-10minutes of mapping before saving, or before changing areas.

Keep up the good work!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158266865
CurlingMan13 (2024-10-24 04:52:15+00:00): Hello.  You have requested a review by checking the box upon changeset submission.

I have reviewed your changeset and have found it to be in good quality.

You can also do multiple buildings in one changeset.  I usually do about 5-10minutes of mapping before saving, or before changing areas.

Keep up the good work!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158266893
Jordi MF (2024-10-23 19:14:55+00:00): Hola Hugoren,

Querría hacerte una pregunta para tenerlo en cuenta la próxima vez que mapee urbanizaciones y otras entidades poblacionales y tener un criterio más o menos homogéneo.

¿Qué criterio has seguido para diferenciar entre suburb, neighbourhood y hamlet para etiquetar urbanizaciones?

¡Gracias y un saludo!
Jordi
Hugoren Martinako (2024-10-24 07:45:18+00:00): Buenas, pues ciertamente al no estar definido, me baso en un criterio personal, y hago dos clasificaciones: urbana y rural.

En urbana, lo que acostumbramos a decir en españa urbanizaciones (en algún caso se llaman tal cual, Urbanización Miramar) suelen contar con piscinas o campos de golf, son hileras de chalets o adosados (mayormente) que parecen mantener un "orden" sobre el terreno, ya sean calles largas o curvas. No se aprecia actividad agrícola vía satélite. Entonces, si la población es < 1000hab, neighbourhood. Si excede, > 1000hab, suburb. Ejemplo: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/38.06205/-0.71098

En rural, las calles se disponen de manera más anárquica, se nota más antigüedad en las construcciones también, suelen tener una iglesia o plaza mayor, se puede ver actividad agrícola (ya sea algún tractor, o nave cerca). Y aquí un criterio similar al urbano: si la población < 1000hab, hamlet. Si excede, village. Ejemplo: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/38.114115/-0.719883

Ahora bien, no siempre cambio el tipo de lugar, si algo me choca, suelo revisar el historial del nodo a ver cómo comenzó siendo, por si hubiese cambiado. En otro casos, es bastante evidente que se trata de un error en la traducción (muchos village que no son), o suburbs con 20 habitantes.

Ah, y otro detalle de las urbanizaciones, y es que al ser muy grandes, contienen residenciales: si dicho residencial no tiene ref:ine, considero que el INE no lo destaca, si no que lo integra en otro ente de mayor categoría, por tanto, degrado ese elemento a place=city_block

Ya me dirás qué te parecen
Un saludo
Hugoren Martinako (2025-04-22 19:11:28+00:00): A raíz de los comentarios publicados aquí: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES_talk:Directrices_de_etiquetado_espa%C3%B1olas#Criterios_de_n%C3%BAcleos_de_poblaci%C3%B3n me gustaría matizar que veo con bastante sentido que no existan place=suburb dentro de aquellos municipios cuya población no alcance los 10.000 habitantes, puesto que el suburbio es un ente de algo más grande, como un place=town o place=city
Jordi MF (2025-04-23 01:24:10+00:00): Esto último que comentas me parece que tiene sentido y creo que sería un buen criterio a seguir.

Estaré pendiente de los comentarios de la wiki. Gracias por el aviso.
mueschel (2024-10-24 18:01:55+00:00): Hi,

You used many tags here that are not in use in any other place. Please use only tags that are described in the OSM Wiki or are available in the presets of your editor.
This is necessary to make sure that every other user can understand the data.

Examples:

    boys = yes
    elderly = yes
    facility_gps-Latitude = 6.5239817
    facility_gps-Longitude = 3.2312182
    facility_use = aluminum
    girls = yes
    men = yes
    plwd = yes
    status = functional
    women = yes
Hanys1871 (2025-02-10 19:10:21+00:00): Dlaczego dla Legionów cycleway:no?
ostatnio jak tam byłem to były namalowane sierżanty
cpa8 (2024-11-02 21:09:23+00:00): Bonsoir @flodu29, la clé que vous avez ajouté remonte en erreur dans Osmose ("Default and local language name not the same ") : https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/#loc=14/48.41404/-4.47543&item=5xxx%2C9xxx&level=1
Je débute sur OSM, est-ce normal ou il faudrait bien nommer la rue "Rue Bobby Sands" ?
flodu29 (2024-11-02 21:15:01+00:00): Bonjour, Je n'avais pas vu, effectivement ça doit être ça. c'est modifié
pitfire (2024-10-25 04:04:03+00:00): Hallo snowmover,
Tipp:
Unterschiede nach Fahrtrichtung benötigen den Eintrag für beide Richtungen. (left & right)

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=DE:Key:maxspeed&uselang=de#Unterschiede_nach_Fahrtrichtung

Für den Fall: Weg: Zur Bröl (371523726)
ist es Abhängigkeit von anderen Bedingungen.
Zulässige Höchstgeschwingigkeit bei nasser Fahrbahn. 
maxspeed:conditional=30 @ wet

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=278665197255838&focus=photo&lat=50.834445365217&lng=7.3417275296443&z=17
VG
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:15:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:12:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
starsep (2024-10-23 21:30:12+00:00): Cześć, "Geodezyjny środek Warszawy" nie jest nigdzie widoczny w terenie prawda?
Moim zdaniem taki obiekt nie powinien się znaleźć w OSM
syzyrk000 (2024-10-23 22:00:32+00:00): Nie jest widoczny. Rzeczywiście, zaraz go usunę.
AndersAndersson (2024-10-24 20:35:12+00:00): Finns det inte varmvatten i duschen längre?
AndersAndersson (2024-10-28 22:33:08+00:00): Har du något svar på detta?
Du ändrade från dusch med varmvatten till att det finns en ospecificerad dusch. Varför?
Msiipola (2024-10-29 07:36:59+00:00): Återställt tidigare taggar för byggnad
ObscureAngel (2024-10-24 09:03:34+00:00): Hello and thank you for your contribution !

Please note for the future: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to :
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping ! :-)
Andrea Musuruane (2024-10-24 08:33:22+00:00): Ciao. Il numero civico del bar dove l'hai preso? Perche' non puo' essere il 13 dato che non segue la progressione dei numeri civici della piazza. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158268475
mikki65 (2024-10-24 13:09:20+00:00): Corretto   ho messo s/n   senza numero civico
Jrachi (2024-11-28 17:27:32+00:00): Hai aggiunto tu il baffo:
Percorso: 1327611790
Alla relazione della VF?
Dardy (2024-11-28 21:36:00+00:00): Ciao, la way esisteva già, l'avevo spezzata proprio per togliere il pezzo superfluo ma evidentemente me ne sono scordato nell'intero edit. Sistemato
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:13:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
Baloo Uriza (2024-10-23 21:10:45+00:00): Changeset comments should not contain ad copy.  Please consult the wiki for advice on how to correctly tag phone and address information.  This location is in the middle of a street right of way, so it's also not georeferenced correctly.

In order to reduce the amount of work for other volunteers, please edit in good faith and don't spam.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158268840
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:20:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:21:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:24:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
Andrea Musuruane (2024-10-24 08:28:49+00:00): Ciao. Ma se si chiama 	LF Office, perche' gli cambi il nome? Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158269297
nick1993 (2024-10-24 18:10:57+00:00): Ciao Andrea, penso che sia un preset di id al cambio brand, ne ho fatti talmente tanti negli ultimi giorni che non me ne saro' neanche accorto, ottimo ad avermelo fatto notare, ristemo il name subito
streckengaenger21 (2024-10-23 19:57:02+00:00): Sorry, wrong comment description: changes are made to "Ligne de Neuville-de-Poitou à Bressuire" in station Parthenay (insert existing tracks)
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-10-24 15:24:20+00:00): jakie wiesz że ta miejscowość ma takie nazwy w tych językach?
Barroszt (2024-10-24 18:06:47+00:00): Z artykułów na Wikipedii
HuggeK (2025-12-22 23:09:04+00:00): Who got the brilliant idea to remove the old relation which had a wikidata tag https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174647646 and not link it in this new one?
Metzor (2024-10-24 05:57:58+00:00): Hallo crazyD,

In deinem Link, den du als Quelle deiner Änderung angibst, steht etwas von basemap. Die Lizenz von basemap ist nicht kompatibel mit OSM.

Aber vielleicht hat deine Quelle nichts mit bademap zu tun?

Könntest du das bitte noch mal erklären? Danke und Gruß
Metzor
CrazyD (2024-10-24 06:48:25+00:00): Hi Metzor,

ich habe nicht darauf geachtet, dass diese Info beim Abspeichern hinterlegt wird. Den Layer habe ich lediglich zur groben Orientierung genutzt, um sicherzugehen, dass ich nicht die falschen Objekte erwische. Es gibt bei Naturschutzgebieten oft Dopplungen (FFH, NSG etc.) und der Layer ist hilfreich, um bspw. Natura 2000-Gebiete, die bereits eingepflegt sind, schnell eindeutig identifizieren zu können.

Grüße
Metzor (2024-10-24 08:33:21+00:00): Okay, danke für die Erläuterung!
Muokkaaja (2024-10-30 20:29:17+00:00): Tikkurilan liityntäpysäköintialueelle tultaessa on kylläkin nykyisin stop-merkki (Piste: 1055475459 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1055475459)
Tierumpu (2024-11-01 15:31:23+00:00): Kiitos tiedosta, hyvä että huomasit asian. Tässä on näköjään taas stop-merkki.
dzamper (2025-02-18 12:50:00+00:00): Linia 713 już ma relację 3712910, ta 18201823 jest niepotrzebna. + route=train to tag dla relacji pociągów, a nie linii kolejowych ;)
Benoît C MdP (2024-11-04 11:12:58+00:00): Bonjour

Pourquoi avoir ajouté une piste cyclable inexistante sur le terrain ? Je supprime. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1327626472

Bonne continuation

Benoît
VLD314 (2024-11-07 17:03:42+00:00): Hi Benoît, thanks for reaching out. After reviewing this, I added a cycle path based on Bing aerial and street-level imagery. I could confirm that Rue Soufflot and Rue Saint Jacques have pictograms indicating cycleways. Do you have any  local insight that might add context to what's visible in these images?

Thank you for you feedback!
Olivia
Benoît C MdP (2024-11-07 17:09:57+00:00): Merci Olivia

C'est effectivement un cheminement cyclable, mais pas une piste cyclable.. Les pictogrammes indiquent que les vélos peuvent y passer, mais pas nécessairement que c'est une piste.
Pour que ce soit une piste cyclable, il faut que ce soit réservé aux cyclistes et séparé physiquement du reste de la circulation.

Benoît
VLD314 (2024-11-07 19:04:19+00:00): Thank you for the explanation, Benoît!

Best,
Olivia
PcMouse1 (2024-10-24 00:28:48+00:00): Hello mashdash, is there any signed indication that Boomerang Trail has restricted bicycle access? It's always been a unsanctioned trail used by mountain bikers and hikers.
mashdash (2024-10-24 00:56:29+00:00): Hello, apologies for the change, I didn’t realize mountain biking was allowed. A mapping application marked this as a bike path (for casual users) and a user reported it to be changed so I did without checking mountain biking. 

You can change it back now or I will in the coming days, and add a tag for the mapping application that won’t affect the map for mountain biking. Apologies again for the change without double checking!
PcMouse1 (2024-10-24 04:48:36+00:00): Thank you for your message and for the clarification. I'll go ahead and add appropiate access tags for the path.
Thanks for following up!
Marek-M (2024-10-24 06:21:43+00:00): Cześć, numerów lokalu nie wprowadzamy do `addr:housenumber`. Można do tego wykorzystać dodatkowy tag `addr:door` - poprawkę Twoich 2 błędnych adresów możesz sprawdzić w tym changeset: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=158281495
Marek-M (2024-10-24 06:27:43+00:00): Dodatkowo budynek Krokowska 4 był prawidłowo oznaczony 1 adresem, bo te dodatkowe adresy dołożone przez Ciebie wskazują jedynie na poszczególne lokale w budynku. Przywróciłem adres w tym budynku: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=158281670
Pänguin (2026-01-31 12:26:53+00:00): Moin - warum hast Du den Namen weg gemacht? Das ist der in der Gemeinde übliche Name für diesen Weg.
Todeskuh (2026-01-31 19:39:52+00:00): Moin, ich habe zwar versucht, irgendwo den Namen Schulweg als offiziellen Namen zu finden, das ist mir aber nicht gelungen. So wie Du geschrieben hast, dass es der "übliche Name" ist gehe ich davon aus, dass er nur inoffiziell so heisst? In dem Fall würde loc_name=Schulweg besser passen.
Pänguin (2026-01-31 20:31:38+00:00): Moin,

jo - der Name existiert derzeit nur in den Köpfen der älteren Einwohner. Die Sache mit 'loc_name' ist eine gute Idee. Kannte ich bisher aus irgendwelchen Gründen nicht. Danke für den Tipp und einen schönen Sonntag! :)
user_5359 (2025-04-28 11:20:52+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1327635106. What is the mean of Road=1. Please notice, a street or road of footway has always the key highway! Is the name a reference or a notation of the priority?
une abeille (2024-10-23 21:49:41+00:00): Hello,

You have added some strange nodes to the sidewalks here. Tactile paving information goes on curb nodes, and there should not be crossing nodes in the middle of the sidewalk. Could you please revise?
Zandu (2024-10-25 23:13:02+00:00): Not an import. Tracing the map from averaged gps tracks displayed and permitted for adding from Strava Heatmap.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158272143
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:21:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:11:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:20:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:14:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
CurlingMan13 (2024-10-24 04:48:29+00:00): Hello.  You have requested a review by checking the box upon changeset submission.

I have reviewed your changeset and have found it to be in good quality.

Keep up the good work!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158272775
urbalazs (2024-10-24 06:12:11+00:00): Szia Károly! Kérlek, hogy legközelebb ne az épület vonalára tedd a POI-t, hanem külön pontként, az épület vonalán belülre. Máshol is így szoktuk jelölni. Ezt a kettőt most leválasztottam külön pontra.
Kiss_Karoly (2024-10-24 06:17:58+00:00): Rendben. Javítom a többit.
Kiss_Karoly (2024-10-24 19:25:50+00:00): Valahol olvastam, hogy egy belső pontra, vagy a határvonalra helyezhető el a POI. Kerestem, de nem találtam. Vagy tévedtem, vagy változott az álláspont.
bkil (2024-10-24 21:10:04+00:00): Mind a három forma elfogadható és Olaszországban használatos is, de az egyik QA eszköz pár éve elkezdte esetleges hibaként jelezni. Annyi a hátránya az élre szúrt POI-nak, hogy a reprezentációból nem triviális, hogy a síkidom belső vagy külső felén helyezkedik az el fizikailag (lásd: büfé ablaka vagy ATM).
Kiss_Karoly (2024-10-25 04:07:32+00:00): Ez igaz. Figyelek majd rá a továbbiakban.
CurlingMan13 (2024-10-24 04:39:58+00:00): Hello.  You have requested a review by checking the box upon changeset submission.

I have reviewed your changeset and have found it to be in good quality.

Keep up the good work!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158272819
Jordi MF (2024-10-23 22:27:16+00:00): Por favor, puedes explicar cuál es la fuente para cambiar el nombre de esta reserva. Estás confundiendo un proyecto de la Comunidad de regantes de Carrizales y la catalogación de las Zonas Húmedas de la Comunidad Valenciana https://dogv.gva.es/datos/2002/09/16/pdf/dogv_4336A.pdf
Jordi MF (2024-10-23 23:51:00+00:00): Hola,

¿Puedes dar más información sobre la traducción de esta carretera? No es correcto traducir cualquier elemento del que no se tenga una fuente fiable para corroborar que dicho nombre es usado en dicho idioma.
mueschel (2024-10-24 18:01:27+00:00): Hi,
welcome to OSM!
You used many tags here that are not in use in any other place. Please use only tags that are described in the OSM Wiki or are available in the presets of your editor.
This is necessary to make sure that every other user can understand the data.

Examples:

    boys = yes
    elderly = yes
    facility_gps-Latitude = 6.5239817
    facility_gps-Longitude = 3.2312182
    facility_use = aluminum
    girls = yes
    men = yes
    plwd = yes
    status = functional
    women = yes