piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-06 11:02:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134571999 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed mechanica edits, including those referred to at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7024 and some others.  See also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/currently-ongoing-automated-edit-for-service-vehicle/97737 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-06 11:01:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134571999 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed mechanica edits, including those referred to at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7024 and some others.  See also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/currently-ongoing-automated-edit-for-service-vehicle/97737 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-06 10:58:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134571999 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed mechanica edits, including those referred to at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7024 and some others.  See also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/currently-ongoing-automated-edit-for-service-vehicle/97737 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-06 11:00:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134571999 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed mechanica edits, including those referred to at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7024 and some others.  See also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/currently-ongoing-automated-edit-for-service-vehicle/97737 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-06 11:01:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134571999 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed mechanica edits, including those referred to at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7024 and some others.  See also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/currently-ongoing-automated-edit-for-service-vehicle/97737 .
adrianojbr (2023-03-02 14:36:45+00:00): Olá, Diego!

Kond Drinks é um bar (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=bar?uselang=pt-BR), como você mapeou, ou revendedor de bebidas (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dbeverages ou https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dalcohol) como está no comentário do changeset?

Além disso, há outros bares mapeados próximos. Todos ainda estão em funcionamento ou algum deles fechou e abriu outro no lugar?
Diego de Oliveira (2023-03-02 15:18:57+00:00): Oi, é um Bar mesmo.
Eles vendem bebidas no local.
Próximo a Kond Drinks, no mesmo "complexo", tem a Kond Smoke Lounge, ambos são do mesmo dono e funcionam praticamente no mesmo local mesmo.
frasty (2023-03-02 13:52:42+00:00): Hello,
Fiorentina di Piombino does not serve passenger trains.  It is only serving freight trains, so "public_transport=station" and other tags are wrong here.
I see all you changes you are doing along the Ferrovia Tirrenica some of which I don't really get the purpose of. Anyway, please, do not make changes to things that you do not really know about.
Baloo Uriza (2023-03-02 15:41:16+00:00): A lot of these don't match up with the imagery cited as source at all...
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133193864
Baloo Uriza (2023-03-02 15:40:33+00:00): Shapes could use a little more definition, almost looks like blind-import of mapwithai footprints.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133194051
Derek V (2023-03-04 03:34:00+00:00): Still a new mapper here. Not sure how to work with mapwithai footprints yet and only found out about it yesterday. Most were done as I was learning to work with JOSM. Was looking to populate simple shapes to later start adding addresses. Can clean up as time permits
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133194051
Warin61 (2023-03-03 00:10:54+00:00): Other than imagery .. what evidence do you have that Way: 1150596619 is a wetland???
Ethan Colley (2023-03-04 05:30:23+00:00): Gday Warin, the predominant source I use, if it's not imagery, is MapShare VIC
Warin61 (2023-03-04 08:57:25+00:00): I'm not seeing that as an allowed source in the Aust. Data Catalogue..???
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Data_Sources#Victoria
KhoraKavat (2023-03-02 06:44:10+00:00): Отрисовка села Большая Салырь
jmarchon (2023-03-02 04:33:24+00:00): Hello!
The name= tag shouldn't be used to describe things
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133194472
Adam850 (2023-03-03 04:27:03+00:00): That's what is is called. At least, when I was in High School, we called it the "track shed"
Adam850 (2023-03-03 04:28:18+00:00): I see that it's not an official name, so maybe there's a better tag, or not name needed.
jmarchon (2023-03-03 06:14:22+00:00): I'd probably only put that in the description= tag.
CurlingMan13 (2023-03-04 05:55:49+00:00): Please use "access=private" tags instead.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133194607
gscholz (2023-03-07 06:55:33+00:00): Hi Spaghetti Monster,
this changeset has created a lot of errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=66.98972&lat=39.62641&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=133194641

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Allison P (2023-03-02 12:14:42+00:00): Hey dummy, you forgot about the stuff around Elmore Lake and the golf course.
mavl (2023-04-25 09:01:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
emersonveenstra (2023-03-02 11:16:52+00:00): Hi,

This is incorrect, the highway is not called "Mackinac Bridge", only the bridge is called that: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/375341624

Can you please remove the name from the highway? Thanks!
rickmastfan67 (2023-09-16 00:44:49+00:00): Hate to break it to you, but none of FL-85 or FL-123 are 'freeways/motorways'.  They all have at-grade intersections w/ left turn lanes.  They should be 100% still trunk highways and returned to as such.  They are nothing like I-10.
rickmastfan67 (2023-09-16 00:47:24+00:00): I would compare them to more like US-19 thru WV between I-79 & I-77.  Fully trunk highway, with only the Oak Hill segment of US-19 a true 'motorway', as it was built as a bypass for US-21 back in the day.
Joseph R P (2023-09-17 03:45:57+00:00): Yeah I think you're right. I downgraded these highway sections back to trunk/primary.
jmarchon (2023-03-02 04:34:36+00:00): Nice work!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133195362
mavl (2023-04-23 15:49:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:52:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:48:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:56:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
CurlingMan13 (2023-03-02 14:54:29+00:00): Do not change tennis courts into buildings, unless they are actually buildings....
ivanbranco (2023-03-05 23:07:19+00:00): Gamarjoba Nino,

thanks for the edits.

I noticed some problems tho:
1. name:en=ვატიკანი
name:en means that the value is the english translation of the name=*, in this case it should have been name:ka=*
2. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10703399105
an hotel without a name is not really helpful, especially if nearby there are already two hotels mapped, someone could think it's a duplicate and delete it. Would be a good idea to add a name to it if you know it.

good mapping
ovruni (2023-03-02 06:24:03+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambios se menciona "corrección de etiquetas" sin embargo se han agregado etiquetas no existentes, por otro parte se han eliminado objetos sin mencionar el motivo.
Saludos
GerdP (2023-07-29 07:11:26+00:00): Moin aus Wildeshausen!
Ich denke, hier handelt es sich um diese Route: https://www.osnabruecker-land.de/tour/hufeisen-route/
Allerdings weicht die GPX-Route vom dem ab, was z.Z. in der Relation ist. Ich habe einen Teil abgefahren, der sich mit der Niedersächsische Mühlen-Tour deckt und werde den ergänzen.
segubi (2023-07-29 08:37:05+00:00): Prima, zu beachten ist natürlich immer, dass das in OSM kommt, was auf der Straße tatsächlich vorhanden ist. Das eignet sich dann auch manchmal ganz gut, die Betreiber zu kontaktieren, um die Route oder die Daten mal selbst zu überprüfen. So weit im Norden bin ich nur selten unterwegs, da ich eigentlich immer zuhause in Bielefeld starte unmotorisiert und ohne ÖPNV. Das ist dann doch so mein Limit für Tagesrundtouren mit Wegweiserdokumentation ;-) Gutes Radeln!
GerdP (2023-07-29 08:41:50+00:00): Danke! Dir auch!
Ich komme auch nur auf längeren Radreisen so weit, und diese war die erste, bei der ich Aufzeichnungen für OSM gemacht habe.
segubi (2023-07-29 08:44:03+00:00): Ich habe es gerade noch einmal abgeglichen. Der nördliche Teil ist nur extrapoliert und offensichtlich falsch, dort verläuft die Route offenbar auf Wegen, die bislang noch nicht einmal als allgemeines Radnetz (ravelos) den Weg in OSM gefunden haben... Ich konkretisiere mal meine "note" in der Relation.
Dawid2849 (2023-03-02 16:56:15+00:00): Są tam znaki C13/16 czy jest znak C16 z tabliczką "Dopuszczony ruch rowerowy"? Bo jeśli to drugie, to ten chodnik powinien być oznaczony w ten sposób:
highway=footway
footway=sidewalk
bicycle=yes
Dawid2849 (2023-03-02 16:57:49+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Rowery
Shamazu (2023-03-02 21:10:08+00:00): To drugie. Dzięki za uwagę, już poprawiam :)
Dawid2849 (2023-03-04 09:31:11+00:00): Dzięki za zmapowanie tego chodnika i szybką naprawę!
jmarchon (2023-03-03 02:22:13+00:00): Nice work! Welcome to OSM!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133197485
@Garam (2024-01-16 13:45:39+00:00): 바뀜 #133197671의 길 1150622505는 존재하지 않는 길인 것 같습니다.
morago (2024-01-16 23:52:52+00:00): morago 입니다.
길 아시면 정확히 수정 부탁드립니다.
감사합니다.
KhoraKavat (2023-03-02 06:44:01+00:00): Отрисовка села Большая Салырь
DaanLT (2023-03-02 07:38:13+00:00): na bet tai nėra oficialūs pavadinimai
Tomasz Herud (2023-04-08 13:02:40+00:00): Dzień dobry, dlaczego w ramach tej edycji dodana została infrastruktura rowerowa przy ul. Pyskowickiej, która jest jeszcze w budowie?
adas (2023-04-11 20:30:29+00:00): Ale na Pyskowickiej już jest asfalt wykonany. Przynajmniej mam takie wrażenie. I jest on od dłuższego czasu chyba.
Tomasz Herud (2023-04-12 05:55:15+00:00): Pomyłka, miałem na myśli ul. Wyszyńskiego, nie zauważyłem, że bliżej centrum ulica zmienia nazwę. W rejonie skrzyżowania z DK11 prace się jeszcze nawet nie rozpoczęły. Również kontraruchu w rejonie ronda Klapucha jeszcze nie wdrożono.
Dodko (2023-09-17 09:02:05+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10703739515/history
shouldn't the ele be 1174?
Falsernet (2023-03-05 01:07:04+00:00): The currently accepted tagging for busways is highway=busway and highway=residential is definitely incorrect. Whether or not a feature renders on OSM carto, features should be tagged correctly and not however looks nicest. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
jmarchon (2023-03-05 02:32:36+00:00): Reverted in changeset #133311484
jmarchon (2023-03-05 02:32:39+00:00): Reverted in changeset #133311484
Luzandro (2023-03-03 05:59:50+00:00): stimmt für den Hauptplatz selbst, für die Einfahrt habe ich für den Abschnitt, wo Einfahrt verboten ist, analog zur Ausfahrt die Einbahn wiederhergestellt. Alternativ könnte man auch eine no_entry restriction dafür verwenden, was nur komplizierter ausgedrückt dasselbe bedeutet
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133199378
hocu (2025-01-28 13:34:08+00:00): Hi RoshelynYeri,

Thanks for your contribution. However, as part of this changeset, important changes were made to the Oztan Pharmacy (Node 10689199157). All the tags are filled with values that make no sense, almost as if something went wrong when using an automation tool.

Please make the relevant changes to the mentioned object.

Also keep in mind that, I'll revert this whole changeset if I don't hear from you in a week or so.

Thanks
jmarchon (2023-03-05 02:32:42+00:00): Reverted in changeset #133311484
philippec (2024-02-02 20:22:24+00:00): Restore the mapillary.
philippec (2024-02-02 20:23:59+00:00): sorry, wrong culprit
user_17222985 (2024-03-09 10:46:31+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/246708124/history#map=19/48.23576/22.97858 
ти як виправляв назви вулиць даремно залишив неправильну назву у proposed:name Даже якшо я при перейменуванні щас видалю то нема гарантії шо хтось не поверне і сміття proposed :name буде теліпатись і збивати з пантелику
muchichka_s (2024-03-10 10:00:19+00:00): Там учасник sdvm перейменував наперед, я переніс в proposed, то вже було давно. Добре що ти помітив і почистив
paganella31 (2023-03-02 16:47:44+00:00): Ciao! Mi permetto di commentare avendo fatto io il casino, raccolgo le tue note e vedrò di non ripetere gli stessi errori.

Faccio qualche osservazione per spiegare il senso delle modifiche e per trovare in maniera condivisa il modo migliore di mappare quello che c'è sul posto. Per comodità faccio riferimento a questo screenshot: https://imgur.com/zIHFc75

- Avevo inserito la strada che taglia da via alto adige a via salorno perché esiste effettivamente, l'ho evidenziata in rosa. Ritieni invece che sia una granularità troppo elevata e che possa bastare l'unica intersezione ora presente?
- Per quanto riguarda via salorno, avevo sdoppiato le way perché la corsia a scendere (evidenziata in blu) ha un dare la precedenza e poi confluisce in quella "rosa". Assolutamente non c'è uno spartitraffico quindi hai fatto bene a unificarle. Si potrebbe forse mettere un nodo give_way con direction appropriata per evidenziare questo fatto.
- Riguardo le corsie di accelerazione/decelerazione mi rendo conto di aver ricalcato troppo pedissequamente le immagini aeree, "appesantendo" il tutto. Meglio la tua soluzione!
ualios (2023-03-03 11:26:31+00:00): Segnalo qualche criticità nel routing e a mio avviso sarebbe meglio ripristinare alcune modifiche fatte in precedenza da paganella31.

Qui sembra di andare contromano per un breve tratto
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_car&route=46.13438%2C11.11157%3B46.13353%2C11.11097

Questa manovra è vietata
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_car&route=46.13332%2C11.11106%3B46.13392%2C11.11035

Qui manca la svolta diretta da Via Alto Adige a Via Salorno
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_car&route=46.13350%2C11.11107%3B46.13354%2C11.11147

Anche questa svolta mi sembra problematica
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_car&route=46.13468%2C11.11186%3B46.13323%2C11.11241#map=17/46.13329/11.11254
Pucciotrex30 (2023-03-03 12:22:24+00:00): 1. la "svolta diretta" NON  ci deve essere perchè un triangolo di vernice non separa due way , esattamente come non lo fa la mezzeria su una strada semplice

2. si , "sembra" che vada contromano perchè OSM ha dei limiti

3. se c'è bisogno di turn restriction se ne può parlare
Pucciotrex30 (2023-03-03 12:24:00+00:00): Ah già .... 
non fasciamoci troppo la testa perchè durante il 2023 verrà costruita la rotonda e cambierà tutto
ualios (2023-03-03 18:14:11+00:00): 1. Non vedo difficoltà nel mappare tracce separate laddove la segnaletica indica cambi di direzione. Non se ne potrebbe fare a meno, come in questo caso, dove la segnaletica orizzontale consente espressamente di anticipare la svolta a dx senza necessità di impegnare il successivo incrocio circolare. 

2. Se il criterio è la barriera fisica allora, a maggior ragione, non bisognerebbe neppure mappare questo:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1150632963
oltre che le due way collegate di senso opposto, neppure loro separate da una barriera fisica. E non ci sarebbe stato nessun sospetto di contromano.

Diversamente io avrei lasciato anche qui due accessi, entrambi contraddistinti da un segnale orizzontale di precedenza. Uno che si immette a nord nello stesso senso di marcia, l'altro a sud sulla corsia opposta, effettuando un attraversamento puntuale.
D'altra parte quante volte agli incroci, soprattutto in città, tracciamo svolte indicate solo dalla segnaletica orizzontale o verticale?
ualios (2023-03-05 18:34:36+00:00): Intanto ho ripristinato il segnale (orizzontale) di precedenza su Via Salorno che ovviamente si giustifica solo in presenza della strada di accesso diretto da Via Alto Adige a Via Salorno, che ho ugualmente ripristinato.
paganella31 (2023-03-06 08:38:21+00:00): Ribadisco che essendo stato "chiamato in causa" volevo spiegare perché avessi fatto determinate scelte, non ho comunque l'esperienza per dire cosa sia meglio fare. Vero è che dovrebbero partire i lavori quindi poi la situazione cambierà ancora.
Segnalo in ogni caso che ci sono due route bus provenienti da Sponda Trentina da sistemare.
ualios (2023-03-06 10:44:41+00:00): Si... e anche la svolta da Sponda Trentina (da Nord) a Via Salorno non sembra consentita, puoi confermare?
Pucciotrex30 (2023-03-06 11:12:38+00:00): Si , la regola è la barriera fisica e NO , osm non è perfetto quindi bisogna sapersi accontentare , ovvero way parallele inesistenti sono un grosso errore, mentre un segmento che unisce due primary è un piccolo errore.
D'altra parte quante volte ? 
Mai.
ualios (2023-03-06 17:18:18+00:00): ...e cancellare una segnaletica orizzontale di precedenza insieme alla corsia che ne ha diritto è un piccolo o grande errore?
paganella31 (2023-03-09 16:26:52+00:00): Lunedì iniziano i lavori: https://www.comune.trento.it/Comunicazione/Il-Comune-informa/Ufficio-stampa/Comunicati-stampa/Lunedi-13-marzo-al-via-i-lavori-alla-rotatoria-di-San-Lazzaro
Pucciotrex30 (2023-03-10 07:33:02+00:00): Ottimo , Paganella31.
Vuoi avere il piacere di inserire construction anzichè proposed , visto che a giudicare dal nome sei di quelle parti ? :D
ualios (2023-03-10 10:03:18+00:00): "Lunedì iniziano i lavori..."

Meglio così, a volte la ragionevolezza richiede tempi più lunghi della costruzione di una rotatoria, quindi inutile insistere.
Ad ogni modo ora le relazioni spezzate sono aumentate, sia quelle route che restriction, quindi se possibile correggere.

P.S. La traccia "proposed" della nuova rotatoria non è corretta, almeno stando agli elaborati che si trovano in rete.
MarkusHD (2023-03-02 07:55:33+00:00): Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3579826
Larmax (2023-03-02 14:37:18+00:00): Hi, please add Swedish name to  the name=* tag and not the Finnish one in majority Swedish speaking areas!
MajaMaravic (2023-03-02 14:44:03+00:00): Hi, will add. Thanks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-06-16 12:39:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 137412856 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers
abdul_4ts (2023-03-04 09:55:39+00:00): Thanks for mapping AbdulSalam1 and tagging knustyouthmappers.
Consider using "mapped a forest" or "mapped a forest reserve" in changeset comment. This would communicate clearly what you've mapped. Thanks again and have a happy mappy day
abdul_4ts (2023-04-29 20:08:13+00:00): Hello AbdulSalam1, thanks for mapping. I know this is about 2 months, i wanted to draw your attention to a natural wood you mapped using a node (point). Note that nodes are used for, example, single tree, shop, etc. To map a forest/small wood, kindly use the 'area' tool to draw a polygon of the whole forest/wood.
Thanks for mapping.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-06-16 12:39:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 137412856 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers
StefanHRT (2023-03-02 09:27:49+00:00): korrigiere mal bitte das Traffic_sign in 240, Danke
cyton (2023-03-02 09:38:23+00:00): hab ich, nehm an das war ein vertipper neben die null?

ich hab auch mal die strecke der brücke verkürzt, die sollen nur von dehnungsfuge bis dehnungsfuge gehen

https://osm.org/changeset/133203686
user_18208051 (2023-03-02 09:41:05+00:00): Danke und ja das kann nur ein Vertipper mit den dicken Fingern gewesen sein ;)
Eino81 (2023-03-06 09:35:59+00:00): Just asking, is there a gate, or can we get into that tiny street? Google street view shows a gate. I did not check it myself personally yet, it takes me 6-7 kms to gete there. If there is a gate and it is open only for the residents there, the rights should be updated to "private" maybe.
Aleksandar1994 (2023-03-06 10:12:44+00:00): Hi Eino81! 
Thanks for taking an interest in this road.
 Unfortunately, I don't have any ground truth on whether or not there is a gate at the beginning of the street. If anyone else has information about it, please feel free to add it to the map. 
Thanks again for your help in improving OpenStreetMap!
Best regards
Aleksandar
osmviborg (2023-03-02 11:46:44+00:00): Vejen hedder 'Ravnebjergvej':  https://vis.dataforsyningen.dk/vejstykker/0706/1488
osmviborg (2023-03-02 11:53:30+00:00): Du skal tage kontakt til Syddjurs Kommune, hvis du mener at vejen ikke har et navn.
ALu68 (2023-03-03 22:34:12+00:00): Привет Юлия98

Welcome to OSM.

Most Keys:Tag=Value as well as opening_hours are written in english: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:opening_hours

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1092022821
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/497174253
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/315711025
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/497179369
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/560663249
Euxeinos (2023-06-02 20:29:21+00:00): αρχαιολογικό μνημείο
literan (2023-03-05 21:38:21+00:00): этот тег на платформе (самой остановке) лишний. Он ставится только на точку public_transport=stop_position
mini-me (2023-03-10 03:15:09+00:00): Не лишний. platform может использоваться без stop_position и наоборот
literan (2023-03-10 06:16:32+00:00): мало ли каким пользователем и как может использоваться точка platform, это на схему тегирования никакого влияния не оказывает. Здесь хвост следует за собакой, а не наоборот.

Согласно вики, тег bus=yes ставится только на точку public_transport=stop_position, которая проставляется на линии дороги:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Public_transport
mini-me (2023-03-10 07:29:41+00:00): Просто вносить предложения и править вики - тот ещё гемор. По факту, iD уже добавляет этот тег. И это правильно. С помощью стилей в JOSM можно подсветить остановки нужного вида транспорта. Это помогает, когда вносишь десятки маршрутов. А если сопоставляете с внешними источниками, то позволяет обойтись без лишней эвристики. Пример:
https://ibb.co/44gWmWh
красный маркер - координаты остановки с портала ОТ, зелёный - автобусная остановка