piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
hrhino (2023-07-18 16:40:01+00:00): Ah, interesting. It seems like the iD editor embedded in the task manager only lets you select the "Building" type. There's a dropdown for "Building" there that defaults to "yes"; you should be able to click that and select "house".

I hope that helps! (I use a different editor so this is new to me, too.)
dcskobuffs (2023-07-14 17:07:38+00:00): Correction: Source used was Maxar SecureWatch Imagery 2023-02-23
merylstreet (2023-07-17 10:21:50+00:00): Hello flatroy, do you have any more info on that restaurant by any chance? I'm trying to find it online but can't see anything and it doesn't sound french either.
silversurfer83 (2023-07-15 11:19:55+00:00): Hi :)

nur als Information: Ein anderer Nutzer und ich haben mal die Eigenschaften eures Ladens etwas an die Vorgaben von OSM angepasst. Sieht jetzt besser aus.

Alles Gute
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138517361
Unbeatable101 (2023-08-19 03:07:15+00:00): Hi Diverdavis, when making areas close to roads or other ways, please try to refrain from 'gluing' them to the road or way (making a node connection), if you are using iD, you can stop nodes from automatically connecting by holding alt (windows) or option (macos) when you are placing a point.
Jakka (2023-07-15 06:39:25+00:00): Best geen dubbele benaming geven. nu eens op gebied dan nog eens op gebouw .... zie welkom bericht voor betere oplossing
user_5359 (2023-07-15 07:07:55+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Der Changeset Kommentar sollte auch am Weg stehen.
vasony (2023-07-20 07:58:50+00:00): Szia!

Mi az oka, hogy az old_addr címkéket letörlöd?

Tamás
vasony (2023-08-24 14:03:03+00:00): Válasz hiányában a módosításcsomagot visszavontam.
Jarek 🚲 (2026-02-24 19:20:17+00:00): Hey Nate, FYI I set lanes on Dundas back to 4 in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179004555, see comments there for reasoning
Allison P (2024-02-24 21:35:04+00:00): Are you sure the unit and housenumber are the same? Typically the park has a single address and then they have space/trailer numbers. The assessor says the address is 321 E Idaho St.
Jarrardi (2024-02-25 04:56:46+00:00): You are absolutely correct. Not sure what happened here, but I removed the house numbered. Thanks so much for catching this! <3
Allison P (2024-02-25 07:07:10+00:00): I would think 321 is a housenumber, not a block. I have not heard of any block-based addresses in the United States.
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2023-07-14 18:43:51+00:00): استعادة لمحمية تم حذفها بالخطأ
Jan Olieslagers (2023-07-15 09:13:59+00:00): What is the use of this grass runway? RAF glider cadets?
thx811 (2023-07-15 11:10:31+00:00): Hello, I believe it is used by the civilian Pathfinder Flying Club. The RAF webpage says there is no military flying from Wyton any longer. There is some information about the construction of the runway here: https://www.glebefarmfoods.co.uk/2016/05/18/glebe-farm-get-recognition-help-keep-flying-raf-wyton/
Jan Olieslagers (2023-07-15 14:02:39+00:00): Hm, that makes me inclined to add a node with "aeroway=airstrip" plus "description=Pathfinder Flying Club Airstrip" or such. Thoughts?
adrianojbr (2023-08-05 19:16:33+00:00): Olá, Sname.

As etiquetas de endereço (addr:*) não devem ser usadas em vias, mas tão somente em edifícios e pontos de interesse.

Abraço!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138520213
Iko IRM-RV (2023-07-21 04:08:50+00:00): Hi,
I'm guessing you accidentally uploaded the road data.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138520222
eggie (2023-07-23 14:54:05+00:00): Hoi kaartjesman...  Het is niet de bedoeling om adressen te combineren. Want dan werkt het niet meer correct in de verschillende routingapps.  

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-07-23 14:56:21+00:00): reverted by changeset #138897441

Je kunt wel de adresnoxdes gewoon verschuiven en op de juiste plaats leggen. Het Kadaster houdt vaak geen rekening met de juiste locatie en maakt er letterlijk een potje van.

MVG
eggie
kaartjesman (2023-07-23 18:25:31+00:00): dank voor je uitleg en revert. Kon er niets over vinden online...
eggie (2023-07-23 21:22:36+00:00): De wiki is niet erg duidelijk. We zijn een aantal jaren geleden begonnen met importeren van Gebouwen en Adressen.. en toen was de consensus om niets aan de adresnodes te veranderen. Regelmatig volgt er een update vanuit de BAG  en als je gaat aanpassen gaat dat fout.
Er wordt je overigens niets kwalijk genomen.
Mapse
eggie
NorthCrab_upload (2023-07-14 19:20:19+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4374544936
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/248980449

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Geim (2023-07-16 12:24:12+00:00): Hoi Hendrikklaas,
Zou jij (ivm je wijzigingen hier) eens naar deze note willen kijken?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3781364#map=16/52.4845/4.8625&layers=N

Gr. Geim
eggie (2023-07-16 18:57:45+00:00): De 'fout' zit in de underscore die hier een gewoon streepje is.
Groet
eggie
eggie (2023-07-16 18:59:15+00:00): ... en landuse=meadow 'hoort' er dan ook niet.
arvdk (2023-07-17 08:36:49+00:00): Heel veel validator warnings hier. Ik heb een deel opgelost: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138610053
eggie (2023-07-19 21:31:54+00:00): PB contact gehad met Hendrikklaas.
Inmiddels is het helaas  weer een warboel geworden. ... met o.a. lege plekken. De landuse sluit niet aan. 

Iets is of
natural=wetland met wetland=wet_meadow
of...

landuse=meadow..
Nu is het allemaal weer niet volgens de wiki getagd en vol met lege plekken.
Hendrikklaas .. Je zou het aan de orde kunnen stellen.
Wanneer noemen we iets wetland en wanneer is het nog een 'gewoon' weide gebied.
Je zou hier ook kunnen reageren.. dan komen we er vast wel uit. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-07-19 21:45:28+00:00): Hendrikklaas,
Dekt de vlag de lading bij deze wiki
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:wetland%3Dwet_meadow
Zo ja dan landuse=meadow verwijderen.
Staat het niet een deel van het jaar blank.. Dan is het gewoon 
landuse=meadow
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dmeadow
met evt een specificatie

Kijk svp ook even naar die losgeschoten nodes.
eggie (2023-07-20 21:29:57+00:00): PB contact met Hendrikklaas gehad.
De meningen blijven verschillen, maar dat mag.

De landuse is inmiddels weer grotendeels weidegebied.
Hendrikklaas bedankt...
MVG
eggie
SekeRob (2023-07-17 16:41:16+00:00): Hi,

Saw your revert on revert in the country report and compared how tags on the road mesh with the tags on the parallel path mapped bicycle designated. If use is obligatory I'd do away with a lot and add bicycle=use_sidepath foot=use_sidepath but given the heavy non-conclusive and long discussion on the German community forum I suppose there's no 1 size fits all. I'd certainly test with GraphHopper and OSRM to see how routes come out from north of the 2 bridges to north of the 2 bridges.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/756214911
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/585245587

Ciao
Rob
voschix (2023-07-22 15:31:42+00:00): In the meantime I realized that the bollards that separated the cycle lanes from the road, and justified the mapping as a separate way, have been removed recently. Therefore I changed the mapping back to the cycle lane scheme tagged on the road way.
impiaaa (2023-07-15 16:17:56+00:00): If an object was previously known by another name, it's helpful to put that in "old_name=*" so that people searching for the old name can still find it.
Black_Diamond (2023-07-16 02:43:02+00:00): Thanks I made the update.
Rukkhadevata (2023-07-16 03:50:24+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138564367 . According to wiki ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hans:%E4%B8%AD%E5%8D%8E%E4%BA%BA%E6%B0%91%E5%85%B1%E5%92%8C%E5%9B%BD#%E4%B9%A1%E7%BA%A7%E8%A1%8C%E6%94%BF%E5%8C%BA ), subdistricts within the urban built-up area should use place=suburb.
EnumMapper (2023-07-20 14:24:38+00:00): OK
user_177389 (2023-07-14 20:17:54+00:00): Please stop that. You do destroy many relations!
Tomas_J (2023-07-14 20:55:16+00:00): I asked him the same, he changed many border hill names in a wrong way.  :(
Rukkhadevata (2023-07-16 03:39:52+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138564250 . According to wiki(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hans:%E4%B8%AD%E5%8D%8E%E4%BA%BA%E6%B0%91%E5%85%B1%E5%92%8C%E5%9B%BD#%E4%B9%A1%E7%BA%A7%E8%A1%8C%E6%94%BF%E5%8C%BA), subdistricts within the urban built-up area should use place=suburb.
EnumMapper (2023-07-20 14:24:32+00:00): OK
silversurfer83 (2023-07-15 11:02:13+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OSM :)

schön, dass du mit StreetComplete und organic maps an der Verbesserung der Karte mitarbeitest.

Zu dieser Änderung (Rewe hinzugefügt) eine Anmerkung: Der Supermarkt war schon in der Datenbank und dein Eintrag war daher eine Verdoppelung. Ich habe die Dublette wieder entfernt.

Organic Maps ist eine sehr schöne App. Ich halte sie, genau wie maps.me und andere ähnliche, nur eher ungeeignet an der Karte zu arbeiten. Fehlende POIs (zumindest Geschäfte) kannst du auch ganz gut mit StreetComplete hinzufügen. Da siehst du normalerweise auch, ob das Objekt schon vorhanden ist.

Was auch häufig passiert: NutzerInnen verwechseln bei organic maps "Lesezeichen" und "Einen Ort zur Karte hinzufügen". Letzteres speichert den hinzugefügten Ort als neuen Eintrag in der Datenbank von OpenStreetMap und dieser Eintrag ist dann für alle zu sehen. 

Bei Fragen, immer raus damit und weiter viel Spaß mit der Karte

silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138522597
silversurfer83 (2023-07-15 10:54:45+00:00): Moin :)
du hast darum gebten, dass sich jemand deine Änderung ansieht. Mache ich mal:

Schön, dass du die Filiale nicht einfach löscht sonder versuchst die Lifecylce Prefixes anzuwenden. Dabei ist dir nur ein kleiner Fehler unterlaufen, den habe ich schon korrigiert (du hast ein "disused=" zu viel im Wert gehabt).

Die viel wichtigere Frage an dieser Stelle: Ist der Geldautomat noch vorhanden?

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138523411
cyton (2024-02-28 07:32:05+00:00): Hat man in der Remstaler Zeichen 315 ergänzt? soweit ich mich erinnern kann gibt es keine schilder die das parken vorschreiben, einschränken oder unterbinden, auf beiden seiten.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-07-19 04:06:12+00:00): Reverted by DWG for vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138694867
Taya_S (2023-07-15 06:05:57+00:00): This appears to be vandalism as it just removes someones effort to map the new flow of the river. 

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=138524094
Taya_S (2023-07-15 06:42:05+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138532210
VLD308 (2023-08-25 18:06:36+00:00): Hi Thiskal, thank you for your response and reverting the feature. If there are any other questions or concerns I can answer, feel free to reach out.
Shinsplints (2023-07-19 16:35:20+00:00): Thanks. Too bad this trail wasn’t removed earlier so this could have been prevented.
eerib (2023-07-19 17:31:26+00:00): Hello Shinsplints,

This cabin was well publicized on several mediums (Internet forums, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, etc) and within various niche topics (hiking, mountain biking, trail running, peak bagging, foraging, orienteering, abandoned explorations, etc) before the features were documented on OpenStreetMap so it's hard to determine if and what role OSM played.

My current personal policy for adding "secret" or "sensitive" features such as this cabin is to only add those that are either well publicly publicized and/or well visited. This cabin fit that description and therefore I added it to OSM. I continually discuss this policy with others and am open to constructive changes that revolve around quantitative metrics.

Currently, I have left off all other cabins on the North Shore and nearly all cabins in the Sea-2-Sky region. Looking at recent data suggests that those cabins see significantly less traffic than this one did and therefore do not fit my own personal policy. However, if another user was to add the cabins then I would not remove them as it would go against OSM's ground truth policy.

I should note that there have been more than a dozen cabins on the North Shore destroyed over the years. Often it's because of lightening or accidental fires. None of those cabins were documented on OpenStreetMap.

As a final note I should stress that OSM has a ground truth policy whereby the world is mapped as it exists rather than as one wants it to be displayed. This is different than other platforms you are likely familiar with like TrailForks, which allow significant and frequently arbitrary curation of what is displayed.

I hope this helps provide some background.

Cheers, eerib
Linslade (2023-07-16 18:37:14+00:00): I'd say Esworthy is closer to a neighborhood road than a primary road.  I tend to agree that the River/Esworthy/Seneca/28 route is one of the more significant routes in practice, but calling it "Primary" is way overstating its significance.  And I'm reluctant to say that the difference is enough to mark it as a different class.  Pushing so many roads into the upper tiers of the classification system removes helpful detail from the maps.  Why not classify everything as motorways and be done with it?
NorthCrab_upload (2023-07-14 21:30:15+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2702349843

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Sniping (2023-07-15 08:27:24+00:00): Dziękuję. Nazwa była utworzona wcześniej, ja zmieniłem tylko położenie, ale dziękuję. Będę zwracał na to uwagę.
NorthCrab (2023-07-15 08:43:21+00:00): Rzeczywiście, bo dodałeś przy okazji tagi oznaczające paczkomat InPost co pozwoliło na łatwe wyszukanie tego błędu :P
NorthCrab_upload (2023-07-14 21:40:17+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9381853206

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2023-07-14 21:40:16+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9381852440

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
TaraV (2023-07-17 09:40:47+00:00): Hi, this changeset broke a lot of administrative boundary relations. I've fixed them now and removed some duplicated waterways. Just wanted to let you know to be more careful around boundaries in the future. If you need any help related to it, please let me know. 
Thanks, Tara
Frans S (2023-07-16 09:43:42+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings do not meet the quality standards of HOTOSM.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. ( see attached document for more info)
A: Not accurately drawn.
E. Buildings not squared.
These comments are valid for all your changesets on this project !

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138524991
Senihtu (2025-07-31 18:49:28+00:00): Kann man die Sperrung rausnehmen oder sollte man sie verlängern?
schönen Abend noch !
silversurfer83 (2025-07-31 18:53:56+00:00): Kann raus :)

(Gut, dass mal jmd. aufräumt. Müsste wohl mal eine overpassAbfrage bauen und meine alten conditionals finden)
Senihtu (2025-08-01 15:22:26+00:00): [out:json][timeout:25];
{{geocodeArea:Hessen}}->.searchArea;
way["access:conditional"~"2023"](area.searchArea);
out geom;

Bittesehr. (-:  ginge zwar genauer - aber die Trefferquote ist auch so sehr hoch! Es scheint nicht allzuviele mapper zu geben, die mit access:conditional arbeiten!
schönen abend noch!
santasa (2023-07-15 20:17:57+00:00): Hello, K73, I received your message, so I wanted to thank you - those useful inputs.
Emilius123 (2023-07-15 08:49:16+00:00): Reverted. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138535379
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-07-19 07:16:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138537896 where the changeset comment is: See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7313, https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/dwg-username-impersonation/101212 etc.
Emilius123 (2023-07-15 08:50:35+00:00): Reverted.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138535443
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-07-19 07:17:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138537896 where the changeset comment is: See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7313, https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/dwg-username-impersonation/101212 etc.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-07-19 07:18:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138537896 where the changeset comment is: See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7313, https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/dwg-username-impersonation/101212 etc.
Emilius123 (2023-07-15 08:50:36+00:00): Reverted.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138535443
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-07-19 07:16:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138537896 where the changeset comment is: See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7313, https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/dwg-username-impersonation/101212 etc.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-07-19 07:15:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138537896 where the changeset comment is: See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7313, https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/dwg-username-impersonation/101212 etc.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-07-19 07:16:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138537896 where the changeset comment is: See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7313, https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/dwg-username-impersonation/101212 etc.
NorthCrab (2023-07-15 13:20:25+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138544793
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-07-19 07:15:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138537896 where the changeset comment is: See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7313, https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/dwg-username-impersonation/101212 etc.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-07-19 07:16:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138537896 where the changeset comment is: See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7313, https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/dwg-username-impersonation/101212 etc.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-07-19 07:17:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138537896 where the changeset comment is: See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7313, https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/dwg-username-impersonation/101212 etc.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-07-19 07:17:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138537896 where the changeset comment is: See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7313, https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/dwg-username-impersonation/101212 etc.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-07-19 07:16:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138537896 where the changeset comment is: See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7313, https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/dwg-username-impersonation/101212 etc.
NorthCrab (2023-07-15 13:31:56+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138545164
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-07-19 07:17:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138537896 where the changeset comment is: See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7313, https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/dwg-username-impersonation/101212 etc.
CurlingMan13 (2023-07-15 07:45:52+00:00): Good enough of an edit.  Thanks for joining and taking care of it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138525952
Allison P (2023-07-18 19:34:55+00:00): No, this is destroying data. Should be tagged as highway=service service=driveway
CurlingMan13 (2023-07-18 23:32:48+00:00): Added it back in as a private driveway.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-07-19 07:16:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138537896 where the changeset comment is: See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7313, https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/dwg-username-impersonation/101212 etc.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-07-19 07:17:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138537896 where the changeset comment is: See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7313, https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/dwg-username-impersonation/101212 etc.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-07-19 07:16:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138537896 where the changeset comment is: See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7313, https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/dwg-username-impersonation/101212 etc.
NorthCrab (2023-07-15 13:31:57+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138545164
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-07-19 07:17:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138537896 where the changeset comment is: See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7313, https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/dwg-username-impersonation/101212 etc.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-07-19 07:17:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138537896 where the changeset comment is: See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7313, https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/dwg-username-impersonation/101212 etc.
NorthCrab (2023-07-15 13:31:31+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138545147
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-07-19 07:17:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138537896 where the changeset comment is: See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7313, https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/dwg-username-impersonation/101212 etc.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-07-19 07:16:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138537896 where the changeset comment is: See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7313, https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/dwg-username-impersonation/101212 etc.
NorthCrab (2023-07-15 13:31:32+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138545147
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-07-19 07:17:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138537896 where the changeset comment is: See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7313, https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/dwg-username-impersonation/101212 etc.