piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Yunan973 (2026-02-27 15:16:10+00:00): Bonjour,
je suis en train de corriger la rivière, multipolygone qui ne respecte pas les règles d'un multipolygone puisque inner veut dire que la zone ne fait pas partie de la rivière, hors la note sous-entend le contraire.
Merci de ne pas annuler mes modifications avant d'en avoir discuter si tu n'es pas d'accord avec mon travail.
Cordialement.
Yunan973 (2026-02-28 16:02:33+00:00): Je viens de finir, je te laisse regarder et modifier si tu l'estimes en fonction de la remarque suivante :
pour 3 îles dans le lit de la rivière, j'ai créer une relation river avec intermittent=yes, attribut qui pourrait se substituer à flood_prone=yes.
Alors que la version avant mes modifs et la version avec flood_prone est invisible sur les cartes OSM standard, le résultat avec intermittent=yes est plutôt pas mal je pense, cf. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20270597#map=19/43.583976/3.074956, à comparer aux rives en bois et galets sans cet attribut.
A toi de voir si tu veux généraliser cela à toutes les zones ayant flood_prone.
Cordialement
fortera_au (2026-01-24 06:40:38+00:00): Hi, adding nodes with nothing but a name isn't really ideal. I'd add a primary tag so they are actually classed as something.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177630924
Meggsie (2026-01-24 07:09:22+00:00): Thanks. I'm not all that experienced here.
I've removed those nodes and named the building already marked.

Water tanks and dams are very important out here. They now have different names.

Visitors using this reserve and map need to know that residence is private.
fortera_au (2026-01-24 07:17:36+00:00): Houses are assumed to be private, you can add access=private if you're concerned, but "Private Residence" as a name is just incorrect, we don't use the name tag for descriptive names, only actual names.
Meggsie (2026-01-24 07:32:51+00:00): makes sense.
Thanks
fortera_au (2026-01-24 06:41:10+00:00): Hi, the private residence name shouldn't be added in here, that should just be drawn as a house without that as a name.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177630980
goldfndr (2026-01-24 08:10:22+00:00): Hydrants are supposed to be emergency= not amenity=
NeisBot (2026-01-24 07:44:16+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13197866967 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Cafeteria e Restaurante"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-01 07:00:49+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177952748
(No visible changes after review)
Raquel Dezidério Souto (2026-06-17 01:23:48+00:00): Oi, DressyPear4
Estamos revisando os dados para o RJ, você pegou os dados sobre voltagem da Aneel, eles são de que ano? 
Esta, por exemplo, está com 
11500;138000
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/553897022

Mas o arquivo BC250 do IBGE (2023) - Base cartográfica contínua do Brasil, mostra com outro valor: 
99900

https://geoftp.ibge.gov.br/cartas_e_mapas/bases_cartograficas_continuas/bc250/versao2023/

Não é uma reclamação, só estou tentando entender.
Grata.
Raquel Dezidério Souto (2026-06-17 01:57:38+00:00): Encontrei este da Aneel
https://dadosabertos.aneel.gov.br/dataset/gcem-gestao-de-informacoes-de-campos-eletromagneticos
DressyPear4 (2026-06-17 11:50:19+00:00): Aqui encontra mais organizado
https://extranet.aneel.gov.br/gcem_site/
Não existe tensão 99900. Os padrões para transmissão são
69000
88000
138000
230000
345000
440000
500000 (525000)
600000 (corrente contínua)
765000
800000 (corrente contínua)
Raquel Dezidério Souto (2026-06-17 17:08:36+00:00): Grata pelo esclarecimento.
Estava errado mesmo :(
Raquel Dezidério Souto (2026-06-17 17:20:13+00:00): Você acha que seria válido mapear  em ref=* o  código da subestação (SE) -- que consta nos dados do link que você enviou (extranet)?
DressyPear4 (2026-06-17 17:52:16+00:00): Poderia ser interessante.
Pode ser um trabalho um tanto quanto desafiador, já que não possui coordenadas e algumas possuem nomes bem parecidos
Raquel Dezidério Souto (2026-06-17 19:04:15+00:00): Bom.. Seria apenas para as que possuam correspondência com o nome completo  (pra evitar esse tipo de ambiguidade).

Só uma última confirmação,  a source=* está sendo incluída apenas no changeset?   Pergunto para seguir a maneira com que está sendo feito.
Grata!
bxl-forever (2026-01-24 02:55:45+00:00): Hello,

With respect, I don’t see many problems fixed here.  On the contrary, this changeset seems to introduce some bad data.

This footway now shows a silly zig-zag shape, with a node being dragged 16 meters to the east.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1273061840

As for this footway, you broke the continuity of pedestrian navigation, resulting in situations like here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10876835443, the footway abruptly ends several meters before the intersection, making it impossible to properly route pedestrians to the road.

More generally, editing Alaska and Bulgaria within the same upload is not a good idea.  Several mappers tried to warn you over the past weeks/months that editing remote places in the same changeset is unwanted, e.g.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174492334
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174357992
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174268715
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174316594
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173299452
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174076498
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173240989
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177631916
Dimitar155 (2026-01-24 05:49:25+00:00): I've reverted the edit in Bulgaria.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177634691
ManuelB701 (2026-01-24 07:24:10+00:00): Also, "I fixed a problem" is overall a bad changeset comment", ESPECIALLY if it spans through the entire globe (let alone half of the northern hemisphere).
Mlvln (2026-01-24 12:23:13+00:00): @DWG can you give this user an 0 hour block? They have 22 changesets with comments, did not reply to any of them, usually use the same none descriptive changeset comment and it seems they throw darts at the map and change some things where the pin sticks with using not the optimal imagery source for this area. They do incomplete changes like adding separate sidewalks without adding sidewalk=separate at the center line as well.
trigpoint (2026-01-24 12:48:08+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19656
eggie (2026-01-24 07:51:30+00:00): Dag Dennis,
Bevindt zich hier de ingang?
Normaal taggen we dan entrance=main
Mvg
eggie
Dennis Knollenburg RAV Flevoland (2026-01-24 07:55:35+00:00): Hoi Eggie,

Als het goed is heb ik hem later aangepast met de juiste tag..ik kwam er al achter dat ik de verkeerde tag gebruikte.
Thanks voor je feedback!
eggie (2026-01-24 10:42:11+00:00): Oke, maar die ingang bevindt zich toch niet op het dak. Die hoort toch op de begane grond. Ook de route loopt tot midden op het dak>
Dit zijn schuingenomen luchtfoto's.
Het dak is niet de plaats waar het gebouw staat.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-01-24 10:49:04+00:00): De ingang verplaatst van het dak naar de begane grond.
entrance=main toegevoegd

MVG
eggie
Dennis Knollenburg RAV Flevoland (2026-01-24 15:48:00+00:00): Wederom bedankt voor je hulp. Langzamerhand ga ik het wel leren:)
Dennis Knollenburg RAV Flevoland (2026-01-24 15:50:42+00:00): Eggie, weet jij hoe snel de wijzigingen 'Live' zijn vanuit OSM?
En hoe snel LiveNav de wijzigingen meeneemt in de berekening van een route?
eggie (2026-01-24 15:55:39+00:00): De tagging staat bij upload direct in de data van osm.
De verschillende routers hebben hun eigen tijdschema.
GraphHopper een paar dagen. .. andere routers doen er meer dan een week over.
Elke app isanders.
Van LiveNav weet ik het niet. Volgens mij vrij snel.
Dennis Knollenburg RAV Flevoland (2026-01-24 15:59:56+00:00): Oke dan ga ik dat even navragen bij de mannen van LiveOp
LordGarySugar (2026-01-24 17:53:25+00:00): Hey, I don't think it was right to connect the ends of residential roads to the pavements I mapped, I don't think it's necessary to have connections here given that the pavements are now mapped separately in detail. If a connection is necessary for routing, I would use footway=link with a barrier=kerb node, rather than continuing the highway=residential way onto the pavement. Thanks.
flohoff (2026-01-24 11:23:32+00:00): Das ist eine REINE Feuerwehrzufahrt und wird nicht für Werksverkehr genutzt? 

So hast du es jetzt getagged.

Flo
stirps (2026-01-24 12:34:38+00:00): Ich bin da gerade noch einmal vorbeigefahren. Die Straße ist eher eng, ein LKW passt da nicht vorbei, das Tor ist klar mit Feuerwehrzufahrt beschildert, aber auf dem Boden sind Spuren vom Öffnen (aber nur auf einer Hälfte des Tores) zu sehen. Scheint mir so als würden da nicht regelmäßig Fahrzeuge durchfahren, ich kann es aber auch gerne umtaggen
Dodko (2026-01-24 21:43:46+00:00): Adresy majú viacej značiek, treba presunúť všetky.
Romwriter (2026-03-07 08:38:27+00:00): Hallo welzheimerwald, Du hast hier mehrfach maritime=yes ergänzt, ist das Absicht? Beste Grüße, Romwriter
welzheimerwald (2026-03-28 21:41:16+00:00): Der Tag ist vermutlich durch das Vereinigen von Grenzelementen "übergesprungen". Beim Vereinigen von zwei way-Objekten erhält ein way-Objekt zwangsläufig die Tags des anderen Objektes. Dann sieht es in der Historie so aus, als ob diese hinzugefügt wurden.
Dodko (2026-01-24 21:59:53+00:00): Netreba nechávať takéto pozostatky adries
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/80082222/history
Dodko (2026-01-24 23:08:50+00:00): Opravené a doplnené čo sa dalo
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=177662518
Taya_S (2026-01-26 12:16:11+00:00): I removed the place=islet tag you added to lake Carnegie and restored the natural=water tag you removed.

Would you mind being a bit more descriptive with your changesets? "Update" doesn't tell anyone anything about what you are doing. All changesets are by definition updates.

Best regards,
Taya Snijder
NeisBot (2026-01-24 07:44:19+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/1359864231 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Taxi station"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-01 07:00:49+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177952749
(No visible changes after review)
Norbert Dichter (2026-01-24 11:51:57+00:00): Hello, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. Thank you for your contribution. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. Or just hit the Q-key.
Also please keep in mind: many buildings are very close but do not actually touch each other, try to map them close to each other without letting them connect or share nodes with each other, roads, or residential area outlines. In the iD web editor, holding down the "alt" key will keep nodes from "snapping" to each other and accidentally connecting.  Thanks so much for your contribution, Norbert 'Nodi' Dichter, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177633346
Alexey Vazhnov (2026-05-18 22:10:27+00:00): Sorry, Matija Nalis, which address and building have you added in this changeset?
I was near the place today and there is nothing, just sea.
Matija Nalis (2026-05-20 00:29:18+00:00): Well, water polo pitch is in the sea, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport=water_polo

They are floating structures, which I guess they probably remove outside of summer season for protection. 

I think it would probably be better to re-add it with `seasonal=summer` .

(as for the summary, it seems it was just notes fixing in this one, i.e. https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4792986 - the building/addresses are probably in batched changesets around that one; sorry about that slight imprecision)
Alexey Vazhnov (2026-05-20 10:12:38+00:00): Yes, please add 'seasonal' tag. Maybe also you can add something like 'check_date=2025-08' if you saw it, for example, last august.
Matija Nalis (2026-07-17 06:39:16+00:00): it has been done in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184356004
Kai Johnson (2026-02-11 23:48:12+00:00): Hi! Looks like you found a water source for the Impossible Railroad. Some of the tags for the features in this changeset are unusual. Maybe I can help with some improvements. Can you tell me more about what you found out there?
FajrAl (2026-03-01 07:44:39+00:00): Harap untuk tidak dijadikan sebagai bahan tes. Jika ada pertanyaan mengenai tagging, bisa didiskusikan dengan komunitas OSM Indonesia melalui Telegram.
FajrAl (2026-03-01 07:47:50+00:00): Saya harus mengembalikkan hasil edit ini karena tagging yang kurang sesuai, pembuatan relasi yang kurang susuai, dan komentar changeset sebagai "tes peta."
fortera_au (2026-01-24 06:17:09+00:00): DWG revert - revert vandalism edits from sock puppet account

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177634990
Norbert Dichter (2026-01-24 11:51:34+00:00): Hello, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. Thank you for your contribution. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. Or just hit the Q-key.
Also please keep in mind: many buildings are very close but do not actually touch each other, try to map them close to each other without letting them connect or share nodes with each other, roads, or residential area outlines. In the iD web editor, holding down the "alt" key will keep nodes from "snapping" to each other and accidentally connecting.  Thanks so much for your contribution, Norbert 'Nodi' Dichter, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177633580
JalaSam (2026-01-24 12:11:59+00:00): Thank you for the feedback, will apply the same from next time.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177633580
Matija Nalis (2026-01-26 02:08:15+00:00): Pozdrav @OsTaxi i dobrodošao!  Drinska ulica zaista je dvosmjerna, ali je zadnjih 60ak metara tu prije ulaza u kružni tok u OpenStreetMapu-u podijeljena na dvije jednosmjerne suprotnih smjerova (jedna koja ulazi u kružni tok, a druga koja izlazi s njega) - kako se i vidi na satelitskoj snimci sa bijelim crtkanim oznakama na cesti (preko kojih se ne bi smjelo voziti). 

Takvo micanje oneway oznake kakvo si napravio će potrgati navigaciju (govoriti će da se skrene na krivom izlazu iz kružnog toka, ulazi u kontrasmjer i sl.)

Drugi korisnik je to već popravio (vratio nazad), tako da je riješeno, ali bilo bi dobro ubuduće malo pripaziti prilikom takvih izmjena. 

Hvala i sretno!
arjunaraoc (2026-02-22 00:21:57+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177634382
LordGarySugar (2026-01-24 05:37:56+00:00): Also retagged highway=give_way entering roundabouts to traffic_sign=give_way
ieguy3 (2026-01-24 05:53:51+00:00): i tagged as cal fire because on the site it says they are operated by cal fire.
NeisBot (2026-01-24 05:56:22+00:00): Hi NeoGigante, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 83% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 4 addr(s)
- 1 aeroway(s)
- 3 amenity(s)
- 70 building(s)
- 1 emergency(s)
- 13 highway(s)
- 9 name(s)
- 2 shop(s)
- 6 surface(s)
- 1 tourism(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177634724
pitscheplatsch (2026-01-24 08:23:32+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177636928
marc__marc (2026-01-27 02:26:12+00:00): Bonjour,

puis te suggérer de remplacer :
source=survey 2026-01-19
par 
survey:date=2026-01-19 ?
c'est plus facile à réutiliser que de parser le tag source pour détecter plus tard les objets plus vu sur le terrain depuis longtemps
Cordialement,
Marc
marc__marc (2026-01-27 02:50:31+00:00): j'en profite pour te demander aussi de bien vouloir utiliser le ";" comme séparateur standard quand il y a plusieurs valeurs.
car " + " n'est pas géré dans différent outil qui du coup ne comprennent pas qu'il y a 2 sources comme par exemple sur cet objet https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1467110337
oldnab (2026-01-27 05:56:32+00:00): Bien noté.  Je suis entièrement d'accord et vais tenir compte de ces deux remarques. En revanche, la correction de l'existant de ces derniers jours sera peut-être un peu plus longue.
Merci
marc__marc (2026-01-27 08:44:41+00:00): merci, prend le temps nécessaire, pas de soucis.
et si tu le souhaites, je veux bien aider à convertir les objets existant
oldnab (2026-01-27 10:47:08+00:00): Pas de problèmes. OSM est une base collaborative :)
marc__marc (2026-01-28 18:42:50+00:00): c'est fait https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177817350
GSF1200S (2026-06-11 03:03:09+00:00): 你好，人工林跑到江面上了哦。
NeisBot (2026-01-24 07:38:24+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 9 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/230348116 v2 | 5 crossings
https://osm.org/way/230348110 v5 | 4 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/2388609983 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177635535
NeisReview (2026-02-01 07:00:52+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/177665442
fortera_au (2026-01-25 01:59:13+00:00): Hi, you've only removed a single way from the relation, not removed the relation.

The source you've linked doesn't appear to be one we can actually used, unless it's been released under an appropriate license (and the PDF itself doesn't state that). It also still shows Microcarpa Hike with nothing to show it's been removed.

Can you confirm with an appropriate source that it's been removed (so the whole relation can be removed), otherwise this should be reverted to add that removed way back in.
rennicm (2026-01-25 03:25:43+00:00): Thankyou fortera_au for reviewing my edit.

My intention was not to remove the Microcarpa Hike relation altogether from OSM. It was simply to remove the Microcarpa Hike relation with respect to that paticular way being Carawatha Track given this part of the track does not appear to be part of Microcarpa Hike on the number of sources I reviewed of which the one I quoted was only one. I believe this is what I have done with this part of Carawatha Track still remaining in OSM. 

Additionally if Carawatha Track was part of the Microcarpa Hike and its relation it would form a spur to nowhere in particular to the overall loop circuit of Microcarpa Hike which would seem odd. 

If this part of Carawatha Track is formally part of Microcarpa Hike I would be curious to see the authorative documentation or onsite signage that indicates this.

If I have misinterpreted what you have stated or if I have got this wrong in any way please feel free to undo or correct my edit.

Regards
Mark R.
fortera_au (2026-01-25 03:34:09+00:00): Hi there,

That makes sense, what you had written your comment didn't quite line up to your edit, and so I did assume your intention was to remove the relation entirely, not just one part, and that the partial change was a mistake. Thanks for confirming otherwise!
rennicm (2026-01-25 03:46:14+00:00): No problems. Thanks for the response. I'm sorry if my comment was misleading.

I have only recently reduced my edit comments with the understanding that any comment relates only to the particular way, area or point that has been edited and the comment should not be taken to extend to any other ways, areas or points or relations for that matter.
rmntgx (2026-01-24 07:03:18+00:00): Updated bus 34
Deleted bus 20
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-05 03:46:27+00:00): Fixed SEO spam name=* and added missing top-level tag for POI in changeset 183672523

https://osm.org/changeset/183672523
pyrog (2026-03-10 08:33:37+00:00): Bonjour,

La modification de ce way (fusion ou extension ?) à cassée l'itinéraire de randonnée pédestre PR 2 - Sentier des berges.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/920923368 

Je corrige.

Cordialement,
Yves - Groupe OSM Plein Air
minusmajorityhh (2026-02-14 15:15:00+00:00): 宁波海曙处的公共电话经过翻新且可以正常使用
请尽量在较大范围删改前进行更仔细地调查
Taksine (2026-02-14 15:20:27+00:00): 感谢您的提醒，我会尽快恢复
NeisBot (2026-01-24 07:44:23+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13481308928 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Locksmith shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-01 07:00:51+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177952750
(Cleaned up leftovers from previous edits)
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-22 13:09:48+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with advertising/malformed tags and source=* of Google Maps, which is not allowed by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ), in changeset 184431520

https://osm.org/changeset/184431520
A67-A67 (2026-01-25 14:59:03+00:00): Bedankt voor de update.

De tag name is niet bedoeld voor beschrijvingen, maar hoort alleen de naam zelf te bevatten. Voor een voormalige naam, zoals 'De Gouden Reael', bestaat de tag old_name. Ik heb het verbeterd.
Job_ (2026-01-25 17:03:26+00:00): Helder, dank.
pitscheplatsch (2026-01-24 14:20:54+00:00): Hi, just a test?