piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Life in Travel (2025-03-28 11:08:59+00:00): Ciao Jacopo,
non ci sono fonti ufficiali essendo un sentiero fuori rete SAT, di manutenzione dei tralicci dell'alta tensione sotto cui passa.
Viene comunemente chiamato così da decenni da noi local e si trova indicato così su portali delle community online (komoot, mtb-forum... ).
https://community.mtb-mag.com/t/trento-meeting-point-su-e-gi%C3%B9-per-bondone-collina-di-trento-calisio-marzola-ecc.13617/page-96

L'ho diviso in 2 perché attraversa un sentiero SAT proprio a metà
Jacopo (2025-03-28 11:44:29+00:00): Grazie!
Life in Travel (2025-03-28 12:20:55+00:00): Grazie a te, è una procedura corretta che può andare bene per etichettare sentieri? Mi piacerebbe inserirne un po' in questa zona nei prossimi mesi
Jacopo (2025-03-28 12:47:07+00:00): Diciamo che il modo migliore è sicuramente utilizzare il nome ufficiale. Se il nome ufficiale manca ed esiste un nome locale ben noto a tutti e non ambiguo (meglio ancora se esiste qualche cartello o targa che lo menziona) allora si può usare anche quello.
Nella descrizione delle modifiche puoi specificare queste informazioni così è più chiaro. Se c'è un cartello o altro si può anche aggiungere un nodo per il cartello e allegare la foto
Life in Travel (2025-03-28 14:37:02+00:00): Perfetto, tutto chiaro grazie. D'ora in avanti allora cercherò di fare come dici tu soprattutto nella descrizione delle modifiche
Jacopo (2025-03-28 14:45:48+00:00): Ottimo :)
Naturalmente questi non sono dogmi, ma principalmente linee guida, poi se vuoi approfondire e incontrare anche il resto della community ti suggerisco il gruppo di Telegram italiano
Life in Travel (2025-03-28 15:16:45+00:00): perfetto,
grazie mille, ho richiesto l'accesso anche al gruppo telegram!
mueschel (2025-03-28 19:34:47+00:00): Hi,
you used a large amount of recycling tags that are not used in any other place. Could you have a look to the Wiki to check the common tags for the materials that can be recycled here?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Drecycling
eggie (2025-03-27 18:49:16+00:00): Dag Melchior.. Meestal is er een uitzondering voor tweewielers. 
We voegen dan toe oneway:bicycle=no  en ieden voor moped en mofa.
Is dat hier het geval. Het zal anders niet routeren voor bv fietsers.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-03-27 19:03:37+00:00): ieden?? > typo>> idem voor...
melchiorw (2025-03-27 19:11:46+00:00): Ik zal er binnenkort is langs gaan om te kijken of er een uitzondering is, want ik moet eerlijk zeggen dat ik dat niet zeker weet. Het is een klein straatje dus het is wel lastig voor tweewielers. Die zullen eerder de weg beneden de dijk gebruiken.
eggie (2025-03-27 20:06:05+00:00): Oke... Top!
Ik fiets er wel eens, maar om nu alleen voor dat onderbord er heen te racen .....
Maar als je in de buurt woont graag.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:oneway:bicycle
Mapse
eggie
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-08 02:31:36+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164658086
JuanjoMC (2025-03-27 16:22:15+00:00): Hi,

it seems that, on this changeset, you accidentally deleted the sidewalk south and west of Victor Boin Stadium.

Also, shouldn't the sidewalk north of Av. de Marathon have access=permissive as well till the second gate?

Cheers
bxl-forever (2025-03-27 18:03:47+00:00): OK, thanks for the advice, I restored the sidewalk.

I don’t know if I am expected to have a strong opinion about this "permissive vs. private" tags.  It looked fairly natural to open the western sidewalk because it is connected to the stadium; as for the road it can also make sense if people are expected to drop passengers here.  No strong opinion about the second sidewalk.  For the sake of coherence, we might want to apply the same tags there too.
JuanjoMC (2025-03-27 19:32:14+00:00): well, no strong opinion about private vs permissive tags here neither.

I happen to pass by there quite often, but mostly on week ends and, most of the time, the gates near Av. de Bouchout are closed. This is why it didn't surprised me that a fellow mapper marked the roads as private. I did the same for the sidewalks for the shake of coherence.

A few years ago, those gates used to be wide open but, these days, the whole 'Plateau du Heysel' has become a place where urban rodeos take place almost every single night. I guess this is the main reason why those gates remain closed as much as possible.

I changed the access tag of the eastern sidewalk, which allow to access the archery range next to it, to permissive as well: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164179051

Cheers
bxl-forever (2025-03-28 09:24:14+00:00): You have a valid point.

If you think everything should be set back to access=private, you may want to reopen https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4684538 so that we can also get RaphaelPasloin’s opinion, especially his first remark about this being public land.
JuanjoMC (2025-03-28 10:35:05+00:00): I hadn't seen Raphael's note yesterday when I wrote here, I saw it this morning.

Raphael visited the place as recently as yesterday morning ;-) and the gates were open: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=566427145793535&focus=photo

So, I think the current 'permissive' tag is the one that better represents the actual situation, as the gates seem not to be permanently closed.

Cheers
Zrop (2025-03-27 17:05:36+00:00): Hallo DerSchmopf,

Du hast hier den Node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1456574817/history um mehr als 1 Km verschoben und damit mehrere Straßen quer durch Köln gezogen. iD hat Dir das auch mit 2 Fehlermeldungen 

warnings:crossing_ways:building-highway 4
warnings:crossing_ways:highway-highway 5

mitgeteilt. Bitte auf sowas achten.

Gruß
Zrop
Leo Slager (2025-03-29 11:41:24+00:00): En hier is dat nog een keer gebeurd:

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=164170262

Ik heb de schade weer gerepareerd :-)
dieterdreist (2025-07-31 12:50:47+00:00): Hi, I noticed that you have moved a traffic sign from it's actual position to the middle of the road (part of a highway), this is not helpful, as it would loose the implicit information of direction. Case is this: node 1389062964
wavez (2025-07-31 13:05:05+00:00): Hello. Feel free to fix whatever errors are present on the map. While I'm certain my changes are correct and in good faith, no one is perfect. Have a nice day
dieterdreist (2025-08-01 09:21:09+00:00): Hi, absolutely, I didn’t question this was a good faith edit, just wanted to tell you it’s better to keep traffic signs on the side of the highway.

Happy mapping
Leo Slager (2025-03-29 11:36:02+00:00): Hoi viviana,
In deze changeset heb je per ongeluk een node geselecteerd en over de halve wijk versleept naar een nieuwe locatie.
Hier kun je changeset bekijken:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=164170855

Meestal ontstaat zo een fout door het verslepen van de kaart en dan neem je ongemerkt de geselecteerde node mee naar een nieuwe locatie.
TIP
Beter is om uit de edit mode te gaan, de kaart verslepen en daarna weer in de edit mode verder gaan met bewerken.

Veel plezier met verder mappen.
felipeeugenio (2025-03-27 16:14:13+00:00): Id	Contributor	Tmstmp UTC	Action	Comment
4681974	felipeeugenio	2025-03-27 17:08	closed	ok.
4681880	felipeeugenio	2025-03-27 17:08	closed	ok
4681884	felipeeugenio	2025-03-27 17:08	closed	ok.
4681889	felipeeugenio	2025-03-27 17:08	closed	ok.
4681879	felipeeugenio	2025-03-27 17:08	closed	ok
4681973	felipeeugenio	2025-03-27 17:08	closed	ok.
4681860	felipeeugenio	2025-03-27 17:08	reopened	ok.
4681860	felipeeugenio	2025-03-27 17:08	closed	ok.
4681888	felipeeugenio	2025-03-27 17:08	closed	ok.
4681883	felipeeugenio	2025-03-27 17:08	closed	ok.
4681972	felipeeugenio	2025-03-27 17:08	closed	ok.
4681878	felipeeugenio	2025-03-27 17:08	closed	ok
4681887	felipeeugenio	2025-03-27 17:08	closed	ok.
4682136	felipeeugenio	2025-03-27 17:08	closed	ok
4681971	felipeeugenio	2025-03-27 17:08	closed	ok.
4681882	felipeeugenio	2025-03-27 17:08	closed	del 5 pasa al 7?
4681877	felipeeugenio	2025-03-27 17:08	closed	ok. Cómo se llama la calle?
4683211	felipeeugenio	2025-03-27 17:08	closed	ok.
4681891	felipeeugenio	2025-03-27 17:08	closed	ok
4681886	felipeeugenio	2025-03-27 17:08	closed	ok.
4683220	felipeeugenio	2025-03-27 17:08	closed	ok.
4681881	felipeeugenio	2025-03-27 17:08	closed	ok.
4682045	felipeeugenio	2025-03-27 17:08	closed	ok.
4681904	felipeeugenio	2025-03-27 17:08	closed	ok.
4681885	felipeeugenio	2025-03-27 17:08	closed	ok.
yelisey90 (2025-03-27 17:04:56+00:00): Hi! This is a generic name and should not be added as such. (All the needed info is provided by the tag amenity=police.) However, if you know it, you may add the particular name of this police station like "Police department #777" or "Police station of Chughureti District".
Also, you used an incorrect symbol for the first letter, ჴ instead of პ
Matěȷ (2025-03-27 17:37:15+00:00): Right. I was transscribing the writing on the building to answer the question in StreetComplete like what is the name of the building, and was not aware of that. I sometimes have difficulty distinguishing პ and კ because they are similar. So I used ჴ to distinguish პ from კ and didn't realize that it is a completely different letter. I realize that there was some confusion at the time because I see how the letters are different now.

If you know Georgian, please, go through my edit history for the past week and check if the names are correct. I do not know Georgian, so I was just transscribing some writings on the buildings where StreetComplete asked me.
Matěȷ (2025-03-27 17:38:32+00:00): So, what should I do next about this node? remove the name, or just fix it and leave it?
yelisey90 (2025-03-28 07:18:44+00:00): "please, go through my edit history for the past week and check if the names are correct"
Ok, I'll have a look ;)

"what should I do next about this node"
Yes, if you don't know the particular name of this police station, it would be better to remove the generic name. If you edit the map using iD (that is, just from the browser) and select this node, iD will show you a warning 'Police has the suspicious name "Police" in English'. The same goes for "Bakery" bakeries (including "თონე"), "Market" shops and so on
Matěȷ (2025-03-31 14:30:05+00:00): I removed the generic names.
Matěȷ (2025-03-31 14:42:53+00:00): Although I did not remove the ones not completely generic like “Hot Dog” and  “Souvenirs”.
Zrop (2025-03-27 17:26:37+00:00): Hallo DerSchmopf,

auch hier hast Du einen Node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11063660457/history um 245m verschoben und damit Wege verschoben.

Gruß
Zrop
炯Intan shafira Rahmah (2025-03-27 16:21:16+00:00): #Mapathon_Ubakrie #Kelas_GIS_2025_Ubakrie #Latihan
user_5359 (2025-03-28 15:13:32+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/9315341309. What is the mean of the tag deac = rock ?
cyclist789 (2025-03-28 19:15:58+00:00): Sorry. I tried to type "desc" and didn't check if auto-fill read it as "description".

The block is a large rock, but the iD editor doesn't like that being used as a barrier.

I've fixed it now.
Lostmonkey (2025-03-29 07:02:18+00:00): Maybe material=rock instead?
cyclist789 (2025-04-02 05:36:47+00:00): Feel free to tag it so.

Note that it isn't just *made* from rock, though. It *is* a large un-modified stone. These are often used to block car access around these parts. Ideally barrier=rock should be used, but I don't think that is supported.
Lostmonkey (2025-04-02 06:36:54+00:00): Not sure if it should then be 'rock' or 'stone'. Leaving it unchanged because it is probably unnecessary since according to the wiki, barrier=block includes natural stone boulders or rocks.
cyclist789 (2025-04-03 04:45:24+00:00): Oh, ok.
b-jazz (2025-03-29 06:00:56+00:00): As mentioned in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163866233, fairways and greens (and other golf elements) shouldn't intersect/overlap with each other. Please read the comments on your previous edit, read the wikis and change how you map golf courses going forward. 
Please reply and let me know that you've read this note. Thanks.
zamekzamek (2025-05-13 11:54:24+00:00): Your relation is shown at öpvnkarte.de as an existing tram route. It could be misinterpreted by anyone planning a trip to Pisa. IMHO it is to early to create this relation.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-06 01:25:17+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164572445
Jose Luis Infante (2025-03-28 11:50:26+00:00): Hola!

Muchas gracias por mapear en Llefià.

Te comento algunas cosas que he visto en tus ediciones.

He visto que has puesto nombre a una vía de servicio de entrada/salida a un parking. Normalmente no se ponen nombres descriptivos a los elementos. Para eso está la etiqueta description.

También intenta no borrar elementos a menos que realmente hayan desaparecido. 

Por ejemplo, podrías haber reaprovechado la vía que has borrado para la entrada o la salida del parking. Es una forma de que no se pierda el histórico de los elementos y también para respetar el trabajo previo de los usuarios que mapearon antes la zona. También evitas que se pierda información. Por ejemplo estaba indicado que la vía está iluminada, mientras que en tu anterior edición esa información se ha perdido.

En cuanto a las intersecciones entre una vía por la que circulan vehículos y otra por la que circulan personas, se deben indicar como highway=crossing. Estaba indicado como crossing=unmarked, ya que no tiene las marcas de un típico paso de peatones.

Por último, te animo a seguir editando y si tienes cualquier duda sobre OSM o sobre el mapeo en Llefià, aquí estoy. También tenemos una comunidad de usuarios a nivel catalán y español que te podemos ayudar.

Un saludo!
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-06 01:23:28+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164572427
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-06 01:23:23+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164572424
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-06 01:21:57+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164572404
Marek-M (2025-03-27 18:00:56+00:00): Chyba wczoraj dostałeś informację, że nie malujemy pasów ruchu oddzielnymi liniami - patrz komentarz w CS: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164082905

Dzisiaj mimo tej wiedzy ponownie popsułeś skrzyżowanie przy ul. Grunwaldzkiej - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1372111162

Takie zachowanie podlega pod wandalizm. Twoja edycja zostanie wycofana a jeżeli nie zastosujesz się do zasad ustalonych w OpenStreetMap, to zostaniesz zablokowany.
Marek-M (2025-03-27 18:01:50+00:00): Wycofanie niepoprawnej edycji pomimo pouczenia użytkownika w CS: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164082905

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164175853
niki88z (2025-03-28 11:32:17+00:00): Мите, малко си избързал с преименуването на станцията ми се струва. Предложението е обсъждано допълнително по време на сесията на СОС и в новинарските сайтове пише, че предложението за преименуване не е прието и остава старото име на станцията. Може би е хубаво да изчакваме официалното публикуване на решението на СОС, преди да правим такива промени. https://www.mediapool.bg/izbrani-sa-imenata-na-novite-stantsii-na-metroto-v-sofiya-news369655.html ; 
https://news.bg/regions/yasni-sa-imenata-na-novite-metrostantsii-v-sofiya.html
Dimitar155 (2025-03-28 13:15:04+00:00): Благодаря за бележката. Не съм гледал записа на заседанието, беше ми попаднал пост че са одобрили промените и бяха записани всички промени, както бяха в доклада. Все пак ще изчакам да излезе официално решението и ще върна старите имена ако действително не са ги променили.
Dimitar155 (2025-04-03 16:44:38+00:00): Наистина не е променено. Върнах го в https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164474373.
eggie (2025-03-27 18:22:40+00:00): Oke.. wel graag source=BAG terugzetten.
De adressen zijn import vanuit de BAG.
Mvg
eggie
silversurfer83 (2025-03-27 21:57:31+00:00): Hi Mielnickel :)

schön, dass du hilfst die Datenbank zu füllen. Hydranten sind da ein großes Feld, mit dem du eine Weile beschäftigt sein kannst.

Kleiner Hinweis: Farben werden bei OSM entweder als kleingeschriebenes englisches Wort oder als Hexwert eingetragen. Details:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:colour

Bei Fragen immer raus damit und weiter viel Spaß an der Karte
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164173798
DaveF (2025-03-28 12:54:28+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/977648747/history
That is not a railway station.
Gregory Peony (2025-03-27 18:09:11+00:00): Some of the building footprints you added hera envelope multiple buildings. Use shadows to help tell one building from another.
NeisReview (2025-03-28 17:31:14+00:00): #UnexplainedChanges

Hello, welcome to OSM.

Could you please clarify the purpose behind your map changes? It's not entirely clear from the edited data and your added description. Also, what was used as a source of your activity?

Looking forward to your response. 
Thank you.
FlyingWord (2025-03-29 08:58:03+00:00): this is wrong naming!!!
Fizzie-DWG (2025-03-29 01:41:25+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17465
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-08 00:30:10+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164656586
Gregory Peony (2025-03-27 18:02:54+00:00): The vast majority of round footprints are valid and accurate. The square footprints in the West are not accurate. The northern one should be round and the other is oversized and envelopes what could be two buildings. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164174041
aTarom (2025-03-27 17:58:07+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM, please do not use keys and values ​​in the designated key space like
"access=private"="no"

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access

Cheers
VLD549 (2025-05-07 15:17:47+00:00): Hi, I was asked to verify name changes. From what I understood we have to write words like 'Sint' in full, instead of St. Could you elaborate? 
Thank you!
Eebie (2025-05-12 11:23:48+00:00): De straatnamen van de weg en de huizen zijn gecorrigeerd naar dubbele namen
VLD549 (2025-06-04 14:21:08+00:00): Ok, thank you.
kabelhaai (2025-06-06 15:15:49+00:00): Correct, added the missing official names to these buildings too: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167272565
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-06 03:16:54+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164573509
Gregory Peony (2025-04-03 03:44:55+00:00): These footprints represent buildings visible in imagery but are not accurate. Please reference my project comment for a building mapping procedure.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164174405
SpinOff (2025-03-28 20:23:18+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
Gregory Peony (2025-03-27 18:25:05+00:00): Some of the square footprints you mapped in this area represent barriers and not buildings watchout for secondary shadows to identify barriers. I flagged some examples on this.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164174629
Gregory Peony (2025-04-14 00:45:29+00:00): The footprints you added are all valid and appropriately squared but generally oversized, sometimes becasue they include the shadow in the footprint. Pitched roofs tend to overhang the walls so is more accurate to map them a touch smaller than the roof. If features are very close together this can lead to the not being enough room to fit them all. See how I mapped these in Changeset: 164916703.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164174782
Gregory Peony (2025-04-14 19:12:07+00:00): The round buildings you added here actually have square corners: generally buildings with (blue) metal roofs have square footprints. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164175162
Gregory Peony (2025-04-04 04:02:05+00:00): The northern most footprint outlines a building and its garden. The majority of the buildings here are valid and accurately mapped especially given that you were using the ID editor. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164175173
Gregory Peony (2025-04-03 05:09:17+00:00): THanks for improving the accuracy of some of the exisitng footprints here. If you can identify which building a footprint is trying to represent, please modify them by disconnecting the shared nodes and dragging them to accurate loactions etc. instead of deleting them and replacing them with new ones.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164175260
Gregory Peony (2025-04-03 05:13:47+00:00): I think that WAY: 1372122262 is just a square building at an angle. The imagery makes it appear the way you mapped it when zoomed in very close. Zooming out a little gives you better shape and orientation information; it should supercede what you see when zoomed in very close. Zooming in helps you place nodes accurately.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164175260
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-06 03:19:09+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164573548
Gregory Peony (2025-03-30 14:06:46+00:00): All footprints are vaild and most are accurate. The residential area could have been a bit smaller, but you modified it appropriately so that it envelopes the buildings in the settlement and avoids overlapping with footprints. This is easy for me to take care of in JOSM. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164175516
Papymaj (2025-03-30 14:14:20+00:00): Once again, thank you for your involvement.
I participate regularly to Mapathon. The last one was this one : https://www.rejouisciences.uliege.be/cms/c_20394027/fr/mapathon-2025
But I know their is still place for huge improvement for my ability to map. 
Take care
Jaiden1254 (2025-03-28 21:57:32+00:00): If this no longer exists delete the node if there is something new there create a new node
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-06 01:21:51+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164572402
Gregory Peony (2025-03-27 22:12:41+00:00): One building per footprint. The footprint I flagged envelopes multiple buildings with a round footprint. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164175609
AlexSpritze (2026-06-11 09:51:03+00:00): Hi SafetyIng,
bei dem Gebäude passt die Geometrie auch nicht ganz: https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?node=12705389596

Korrigiere ich jetzt ;)