piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
WWMapper101 (2025-01-16 16:21:10+00:00): Not actually corrected. Yes, the code RI does stand for Republik Indonesia, but this is not the ISO code for Indonesia as of right now. I will change this to the proper tag
FraukeLeo (2023-09-03 13:46:25+00:00): Hallo Sprühwurst, du hast in diesem Edit das komplette Straßenstück https://osm.org/way/354931205 um 62,4 Meter nach Nordwesten geschoben. Ich habs repariert. Uffbasse :)
Sprühwurst (2023-09-03 19:50:40+00:00): WTF, da muss mir die Katze über die Tastatur gelaufen sein…. :-/
SORRY & danke für finden & richten! *SCHÄM*
Fizzie-DWG (2023-12-19 06:59:45+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145278455
AjBelnuovo (2024-01-13 17:51:26+00:00): Qual é a fonte da informação do nome?
dadavid (2025-03-08 23:57:27+00:00): Hi jeka p, 

du hast hier in der Gegend relativ oft maxweightrating:hgv=3.5 in Verbindung mit hgv:conditional=no@(maxweight>3.5)
getaggt. Die beiden tags sind hier ja relativ redundant verwendet (ist ja nichts gegen zu sagen, beide Schemata zu unterstützen). 
Was mich aber wundert, du trägst zwar das traffic_sign=AT:52.7a "Ausgenommen Zustelldienste und Anrainer" ein, aber ohne das dann auch mit maxweightrating:hgv:conditional=none@destination oder ähnlichem maschinenlesbar zu mappen. Ich würde das tagging gern ändern, aber du hast dir sicherlich was dabei gedacht, deswegen wollte ich erstmal nachfragen, ob das für dich passt :) 

Viele Grüße

David
jeka p (2025-03-13 19:50:52+00:00): Hallo David,
es macht auf jedem Fall Sinn.
Ich wäre auch Froh, wenn Du es anpassen könntest.
Ich werde in weiteren solchen Fällen auch verwenden.
SG
Jeka
balint36 (2023-10-28 11:20:16+00:00): A magyar helyesírás és a magyarországi vasutak címkézése (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hungary/Vas%C3%BAt) alapján a helyes írási mód GYSEV (végig nagybetűvel).
Kérlek, ügyelj erre!
Köszönöm!
DressyPear4 (2023-08-25 17:02:31+00:00): Olá, não adicione uma via por cima de uma que já existe
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140290500
NieWnen (2023-08-24 18:26:51+00:00): Jakie jest źródło tej zmiany? Na pewno nie ortofotomapa. Skąd wiesz, że tu jest droga?

Proszę dodawaj źródło do zestawów zmian.

Przy okazji nie warto usuwać starego obiektu, a lepiej poprawić jego geometrię i zmienić tagi, dla zachowania historii obiektu.
emersonveenstra (2023-08-25 02:32:25+00:00): Hi,

Please don't add names to trees, instead find the appropriate tag (like https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:species).

Also, please don't use natural=wood areas for a single tree, you need to use natural=tree for that instead.

Could you please go back and fix these? Thanks!
eggie (2023-08-23 19:58:56+00:00): Top!
NorthCrab_upload (2023-08-23 19:40:24+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.

"Trute":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/552448303
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/552448314
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/552448319
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/552448325
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/552451620
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1201532798
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1201532803

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Krizal (2023-08-23 21:33:56+00:00): Idk too. Some people who lives here said this street name. So.... If I can't found, i'll swap back
eggie (2023-08-24 04:47:27+00:00): Hi..perhaps it's a local name and not official.
We also have the tag loc_name=....

Greetz..
eggie
forstner-m (2023-08-26 07:41:55+00:00): Dobrý den Miroslave,
změnili jste mnoho orientačních bodů. Jste si jisti, že změna byla správná? Máte zdroj pro nové orientační body? Vaše komentáře bohužel neobsahují zdroj.
Děkuji!
S přátelským pozdravem
Michaele
Mashin (2023-08-23 23:00:41+00:00): All looks good Mike
silversurfer83 (2023-08-24 07:12:22+00:00): Hallo Peter und herzlich willkommen bei OSM :)

Schön, dass du hilfst die Karte besser zu machen.

Eine Art der Kommunikation bei OSM siehst du hier: Änderungssatzkommentare. Auf diesem Weg besprechen wir öffentlich den Inhalt unserer Änderungen. Ich möchte diese Änderung von Dir nutzen um dich zu begrüßen und dir ein paar wichtige Tips mit auf den Weg zu geben.

Das wichtigste zu deiner Änderung vorneweg: Vorsicht bei Haltestellen und Haltepositionen von öffentlichen Verkehrsmitteln. Diese sind in der Regel in sogenannten Relationen eingebettet und wenn du diese einfach löscht und dann an anderer Stelle neu erstellst stimmt die Relation nicht mehr. 

Ansonsten sieht das schon nicht so verkehrt aus, was du da machst :)

Zu dem Editor, den du aktuell nutzt: Er heißt iD und ist in die osm.org website eingebaut. Wenn du ein Objekt auswählst hast du auf der linken Seite eine Spalte die dir hilft die passenden Eigenschaften zu wählen. Leider werden dort aus Gründen der Einfachheit nicht alle Eigenschaften (auch tags genannt) aufgeführt. Um alle tags eines Objekts zu sehen musst du in der Spalte links ganz nach unten scrollen. Dann kommt der Abschnitt "Eigenschaften" und dort siehst du entweder als Tabelle oder als reines Textfeld alle tags (links der "key" (Schlüssel) und rechts der "value" (Wert)).

So ziemlich alles, was man wissen kann hat die Gemeinschaft im Wiki zusammengetragen. Ich empfehle dir am Ende der Begrüßung ein paar Seiten zum Einstieg.

Lass dich von meinem Text hier nicht verunsichern ;)

Bei Fragen gibt es immer einige hilfsbereite Menschen in der Community die dir gerne schnell helfen. Entweder unter c.osm.org oder in einer der vielen Chatgruppen, die du hier findest: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contact_channels#Chats.2Fmessengers


happy mapping
silversurfer83


https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Map_Features
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix
Jakka (2023-08-24 06:50:24+00:00): gebruik digitaal Vlaanderen GRB in controle met luchtbeelden om gebouwen toe te voegen.
inlog toets B kies de grb laag
Chris Fleming (2023-08-25 08:23:46+00:00): HI, thanks for signing up and editing OpenStreetMap. As you requested a review I'm just having a look at your edit. 

Overall the edit is good. One thing to consider is sharing nodes between the rivers and areas such as the river and dam rather than  leaving a gap, unless the gap does make sense or there is a clear area.

The same would be true of the area where the woods have crossed over the dam. I would align these up and take into account that the tree cover will be above the dam, but at the ground level they are distinct area.
GaAsper (2023-08-25 08:41:58+00:00): Thanks Chris, that gives confidence to go ahead with uploading my first ever map edit. I hadn't done anything to the dam yet, only tweaked a residential road, but will certainly have a look at the dam later.
Chris Fleming (2023-08-25 11:08:23+00:00): lol! yes I didn't look closely enough. 

I think there is definitely some tidying up that can be done, especially if you have good local knowledge.
GaAsper (2023-08-25 12:44:06+00:00): Thanks Chris,
Yes a lovely hobby project for wet Scottish days in!
NorthCrab_upload (2023-08-23 20:40:32+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11139883117

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Fizzie-DWG (2023-12-19 06:58:15+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145278396
NorthCrab_upload (2023-08-23 21:11:08+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Generała Sikorskiego":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11139922210
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11139922234

"Plac Poniatowskiego":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11139922247

"Strażacka":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11139922310

"Powojowa":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11139922311
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11139922312
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11139922313
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11139922314
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11139922422
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11139922423
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11139922424
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11139922425

"Kujawska":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11139922321
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11139922322
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11139922431
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11139922432

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
G_P_J (2023-08-23 23:19:56+00:00): Poprawione.
user_20113808 (2023-08-25 05:21:47+00:00): you support russian? you support raping women?
user_20113808 (2023-08-25 05:21:56+00:00): Fuck all you!
user_20113808 (2023-08-25 05:21:56+00:00): motherfucker!
user_20113808 (2023-08-25 05:21:57+00:00): Do you like that Russians rape women?!
user_20113808 (2023-08-25 05:22:17+00:00): GO FUCK YOURSELF!
user_20113808 (2023-08-25 05:22:18+00:00): For your support of the rapists of children, a worse fate awaits you!
user_20113808 (2023-08-25 05:22:19+00:00): you asshole!
user_20113808 (2023-08-25 05:22:27+00:00): motherfucker!
user_20113808 (2023-08-25 05:22:36+00:00): shitface
user_20113808 (2023-08-25 05:22:52+00:00): you support russian? so why reverting deletions of that language? if russian will rape you relatives how then you will act?
user_20113808 (2023-08-25 05:22:53+00:00): You are raper too!
user_20113808 (2023-08-25 05:22:55+00:00): they will find you
ManuelB701 (2023-08-23 22:05:11+00:00): Gemeint hierbei ist, das bei der Rheinstraße, Bismarckstraße, Luisenplatz und Mathildenplatz vorhin entweder die Straßen auf den Gleisen platziert waren (d.h. Straße und Gleis teilten sich die Plätze) oder aber die Straßen hatten Gleiseigenschaften (was gar nicht geht), oft auch beides. Außerdem waren die Typen sehr inkonsistent d.h. einige waren als service markiert, andere als busway (was nur für BRT-Systeme verwendet wird, nicht aber für normale Busse) und das ohne richtiges System (d.h. mal war es als service beschildert, andere male als busway, beides ohne sichtbare Regeln).

Wegen der Komplexität müssen natürlich einige Details behoben werden, wichtig für mich war somit die Hauptarbeit.
Apropos Hauparbeit: Während des Bearbeitens (der Anfang war vor ca. zwei Tagen) wurden zwei Linien geändert. Deren Änderungen mit einzubeziehen wären allerdings zu komplex für mich gewesen (d.h. habe ganz dumm meine Daten genommen) und müssten somit neu eingetragen werden.
wabozand (2023-08-24 14:51:00+00:00): Correction: Source used was Bing aerial imagery; Mapillary.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-08-29 05:50:31+00:00): Reverted by DWG as apparent undiscussed import, possibly using unauthorised data sources & also lack of response

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140522672
kwiatek_123 (2023-08-23 22:45:48+00:00): Nazwa nie powinna być napisana tylko wielkimi literami: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Częste_błędy_użytkowników#Nazwy_wielkimi_literami
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-01-03 12:53:05+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11139958949/history

Is it operated solely by app? Then maybe app_operated=only would be better?
sundew (2025-01-03 16:48:53+00:00): Hallo Mateusz and a happy new year ..

I know app_operated=yes + display_operated=no from the new parcel locker mapping scheme 2-3 years ago and I used it very many times now. I do it manually at my long mapping tours around Hamburg + 150km. But after my opinion such a "new scheme" must be fix at publishing and should not be adapted again and again and again.

Bye bye, sundew 
(sorry my English is horrible)
spatialia (2023-08-24 05:38:25+00:00): Hi SilverWheel! I'm Nick, another mapper in Sacramento County. Welcome to OSM! I have one small bit of feedback, which is that the OSM community prefers that buildings are "squared" - that is, that corners are 90 degrees, unless a building is truly round. After tracing a building, you can automatically square all the corners by selecting the building and hitting the "Q" key on your keyboard. You'll see the corners move to line up at 90 degrees.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140294485
SilverWheel (2023-08-29 20:46:25+00:00): Hi Nick! Thank you for the tip! I've made the fixes to my funky buildings. :)
chris210990 (2023-08-24 12:22:19+00:00): Hallo,
ich bitte dich noch einmal die name tags im Werkgelände zu lassen wie sie sind da die Nummern in dem Fall Eigennamen sind und somit der name Tag laut OSM-Regelwerk genau der richtige ist.
Viele Grüße chris210990
hk51 (2023-08-24 20:48:04+00:00): Hallo,
und noch einmal, hier handelt es sich nicht um Eigennamen sondern um Gebäudenummern, also ref. Die naheliegende Autobahn 95 hat auch Schilder mit A 95, aber trotzdem ist die Bezeichnung nicht in name sondern in ref, und stand im Baubescheid bestimmt auch A 95. Wenn Ihr die Nummern auf der Karte sehen wollt solltet Ihr Euch mal uMap ansehen, https://umap.openstreetmap.de/de/

hk51
chris210990 (2023-08-25 05:54:45+00:00): Hallo,
vielen Dank für den Tipp. Aber hier nochmal die Definition von Eigenname:
Wenn eine bestimmte Nummer oder Abfolge von Zahlen eine besondere Bedeutung oder Identität hat, kann sie als Eigenname betrachtet werden. Wie zum Beispiel Gebäude 211. Wo die Kurzform 211 ist.
Also lasse sie bitte einfach stehen. Hier geht es ja nur um das Werkgelände. Wo ich zu 100 % weiß das es Eigennamen sind.

Viele Grüße chris210990
damianeue (2023-08-23 22:06:26+00:00): in my previous changeset josm froze, I could only upload the changeset I was doing, this is to fix what was uncompleted
damianeue (2023-08-23 23:08:42+00:00): Service area geometry is not perfect, I only fixed the warning
Fizzie-DWG (2023-12-19 06:55:33+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145278305
Fizzie-DWG (2023-12-19 06:53:48+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145278240
NorthCrab_upload (2023-08-23 22:30:15+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/906805547

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
ivanbranco (2023-09-06 11:27:52+00:00): Hi WieKo68,

why are you adding wikimedia_commons=x to churches? See: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1zRG
literan (2023-08-24 17:18:48+00:00): access=no означает что абсолютно всем доступ запрещен. Зачем ставить такой тег?
mariotomo (2023-08-28 14:10:17+00:00): hola, cordial saludo y nuevamente gracias por las muchas contribuciones. puedes indicar cómo se llega a este punto panorámico? tiene nombre propio? lo que pusiste parece más una descripción que un nombre, y como descripción iría en el campo "description", más que el campo "name".
NorthCrab_upload (2023-08-23 23:11:52+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Robiniowa":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11140023900
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11140023901

"Żurawinowa":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11140023903

"Migdałowa":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11140023914

"Letniskowa":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11140023927

"Truskawkowa":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11140023966
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11140023967
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11140023968

"Kameralna":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11140024057
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11140024074

"Dorodna":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11140024117

"Pomianowskiego":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11140024139

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
G_P_J (2023-08-24 07:44:25+00:00): Poprawione.
Jekader (2023-08-31 13:24:24+00:00): Most restored tags were just google translate including brand names which is against community guidelines.

Samples are nodes 23164289, 22926877 and others
Fizzie-DWG (2023-08-29 05:50:32+00:00): Reverted by DWG as apparent undiscussed import, possibly using unauthorised data sources & also lack of response

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140522672
andrewsuzuki (2023-10-19 01:40:26+00:00): tracktype=grade1 is generally specifically for paved surfaces. Most of Goat Hill Road for example would probably be best tagged as grade4. See the table here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tracktype
dpolovinkin (2023-08-24 07:41:37+00:00): Heh pal, your are again mistaken here saying "vandalism of mass deletion of name:uk tags" when two users who added/returned it were blocked by DWG exactly because adding those ukrainian tags was vandalism, you are probably the same guy and you are not in the right here

And to be honest is just pathetic and sad in a way... seeing this repeating attempts to add those translations which just have just no place there and which was proven by blocks of the previous users. Do you want to prove something? Or at least make some change, even in the platform which is objectively wrong place for such...battles? who knows
SillyWillyDon (2023-08-24 13:06:11+00:00): these translations are correct, I know belorussian, russian and ukrainian. I dont care details, they are correct. that is enough to they stay on map
dpolovinkin (2023-08-24 13:21:48+00:00): 1 - define correct? there are no ukrainian names for *all* the places which were changed there, and there are 10s of thousands of them. Adding a translation to a places like some random river near Vladivistok to Ukrainian is beyond meaningless. There is no need for those translations, which are especially 100% politically motivated. 
2 - your account have basically zero commits on OSM, so no mapping experience, not sure you can make decisions like that. Or - you are a second acc of someone? Who is this then? maybe someone who was blocked because of things like that?
3 - did you check all tens of thousands of translations to make sure they are "correct", whatever you mean by that?
SomeoneElse (2023-08-24 17:28:32+00:00): Just to be clear - as per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Verifiability , all data in OSM needs to be verifiable.  There are a couple of examples around the world where one language has multiple ways of writing it (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Transliteration for examples).
However, generally speaking, transliteration and translation should be avoided.  If there really is a sign in a certain language, or some other licence-compatible way of verifying that name, then it makes sense for a place to have multiple languages.  If there isn't, it doesn't.
As an example, it wouldn't surprise me if there was a verifiable Unkrainian name for https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1644131 , but I'd be very surprised if all of the examples that were recently changed were verifiable.
That said, that doesn't mean that the actual name:uk in this changeset are correct.  The one used for https://osm.mapki.com/history/relation/1644131 was the same as was added in https://osm.org/changeset/135670474 by someone whose work was (in the Ukrainian forum) notorious for its poor quality.
-- Andy, from OSM's Data Working Group
dpolovinkin (2023-08-24 17:58:59+00:00): thanks for answer! important thing here is - all those changesets which were reverted by me and them reverted two times already by two new users - are all from this user you are talking about, didn't remove anything else
dpolovinkin (2023-08-28 17:02:48+00:00): @SomeoneElse Hi again Andy, so what do we do here? the author doesn't answer as it seems, and I do want to revert those vandalism changesets which do not have any proper names again, only I afraid this new user will revert it again...
dpolovinkin (2023-08-28 17:15:43+00:00): also I'm pretty sure that this is again a working of avinet_ua even after his ban or something like that as he's quoting your words in this thread https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/topic/100629/90
dpolovinkin (2023-08-28 17:44:53+00:00): just to refer to it, in older thread here (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139177539) I've made arguments and examples that places which are translated mechanically by avinet_ua have no name in Russia. This is also one of many changesets which were reverted again by this new user.
MxxCon (2023-08-24 06:24:43+00:00): Hello.
This way should've been split so that the height tag was only on the way where it actually applies.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140296505
yoasif (2023-08-24 15:08:06+00:00): If you think you have identified a bug in Streetcomplete, maybe file a bug? https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete/issues
MxxCon (2023-08-24 15:27:57+00:00): Nothing is wrong with StreetComplete. 
It already asks mappers to tag only relevant sections with height tag and it has an ability to split a way specifically for that.
citrula (2023-08-24 00:44:43+00:00): Hi, please stop modifying and removing amenity=school areas, it is not correct. If you explain what you are trying to do, I would be happy to help you find the correct way to make your change.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140296998
Fizzie-DWG (2023-12-19 06:52:03+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145278183
Warin61 (2024-02-03 01:27:18+00:00): The sign a the top is legal access=no ... While people might break the law OSM should not encourage it???
DressyPear4 (2023-08-25 16:59:02+00:00): Olá, adicione um comentário em suas edições para que outros possam entender o que você está fazendo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140298106
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-24 02:07:27+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15098
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-28 03:59:49+00:00): DWG revert:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141844958
trigpoint (2023-08-24 07:58:54+00:00): Hi, what is the source of all of the opening dates you are adding. They are all over the country which suggests something other than local knowledge?

Also are you sure Crusader Island opened 8 years after it was mapped?

Cheers Phil
Cebderby (2023-08-24 09:38:52+00:00): There are also highway type changes hidden in these changesets, not described in the changeset comments, typically favouring 'unclassified' over previously set residential and tertiary choices.
SK53 (2023-08-24 12:49:26+00:00): I'm going to revert this as it is completely inaccurate. 

The Crusader Island was constructed way before this to enable servicing of the two estates built either side of the A453 which needed better access than that provided previously when Clifton Lane was a more minor road. It was in existence prior to 1992 (inadmissible OSM source). The Crusader itself was opened in 1984 (https://whatpub.com/pubs/NOT/56/crusader-nottingham), also not OSM admissible. There are numerous GPS traces on the OSM site showing it's existence before this and also OS StreetView maps from 2010.

The actual opening of the A453 dualling scheme occurred at a range of times. It was mapped incrementally as it was constructed and opened (see for instance https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/30021732).

Whereas the entire scheme was probably completed on the date you have added: you don't have enough actual knowledge to provide this information correctly. Changing well-established road classifications in an area which has seen a lot of mapping over the years and therefore likely represents a substantial consensus of mappers is usually to be avoided. In this case it is not clear that you have adequate local knowledge in any case.

Jerry aka SK53
Fizzie-DWG (2023-08-29 05:50:33+00:00): Reverted by DWG as apparent undiscussed import, possibly using unauthorised data sources & also lack of response

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140522672