piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NorthCrab_upload (2025-09-16 00:40:56+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4155007303
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4155007622
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/259049632
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/259049631

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Alan (2025-09-16 16:28:35+00:00): Thank you!
gscholz (2025-11-17 09:16:44+00:00): Hi JoseMoscoso,
regarding the name of this pass I would like to know what kind of source you used. I just watched a youtube video of the channel "slow roamers" where you clearly can see a local sign showing the name "Jatunchacua" and the elevation 4825 m. I have added the locally signed name for now as "alt_name" attribute.
Guido
kingkingHK (2025-09-16 02:41:40+00:00): Are you sure? Names don't necessarily follow the government romanisation, and based on online information, Dit Sei Kau seems more common than Tit Sei Kau.
minghong (2025-09-16 02:58:28+00:00): The word "Dit" was (wrongly) chosen by me 6 years ago (see version #4). In version #2, Swire001 added it as "Tip". But "Tit" should be more suitable according to online dictionary: https://shyyp.net/hant/w/%E8%B7%8C
kingkingHK (2025-09-16 03:09:20+00:00): Yes, I know that the government romanisation uses "Tit" for 跌. The question is whether the commonly used English name is the same as the government romanisation. Based on internet searches, almost all instances use "Dit" and not "Tit". The only use of "Tit Sei Kau" I can find is https://www.flickr.com/photos/minghong/albums/72157622473602534/. (and that post was made by "minghong"... is that you?)
minghong (2025-09-16 03:13:46+00:00): Yes, that's me. Sorry for propagating that error since 6 years ago. I believe many online reference simply copied the name from OSM without reasoning.
kingkingHK (2025-09-16 03:32:03+00:00): "I believe many online reference simply copied the name from OSM without reasoning." Then it still doesn't explain why no one used "Tit Sei Kau".

Since all current uses are "Dit Sei Kau", one of four things is true:

1. This peak has no English name, and "Dit Sei Kau" is not widely accepted. In that case, `name:en` is not necessary.
2. This peak has an English name of "Tit Sei Kau". If this is the case, please give some evidence of its uses (from someone other than you), since I can't find any on the internet.
3.  This peak has an English name of "Dit Sei Kau", both before and after your edit in 2019. Then, this changeset is wrong.
4. This peak has an English name of "Tit Sei Kau" before 2019, but your edit changed the general public's consensus and made people use "Dit Sei Kau" instead. Then, use the new name, as `name` is meant for the commonly used name, not the "correct" or "original" name. Remember that words are an artificial construction, and all names were made up.
minghong (2025-09-16 03:47:30+00:00): The name "Tit Sei Kau" and "Dit Sei Kau" were coined by me at 2009 (see the Flickr description: both were used - Maybe I was too sleepy at that time). At that time I couldn't find the official English name or common English name from the web so I coined the name myself.

Then at 2019, Swire001 set the English name as tip sei kow (version #2). Initially I removed the English name (version #3) because I thought it was not correct. But after a second thought I think it is good to have an English name. But because there was no widely used English name as that time, I picked "Dit Sei Kau" (version #4). That's because I forgot I used "Tit" before in Flickr and the Cantonese spelling is "Dit" so I picked the latter.

Regarding the online search results, I couldn't find any reference to "Dit Sei Kau" before 2019. So those pages use the term "Dit Sei Kau" only because such name was used in OSM since 2019.
kingkingHK (2025-09-16 03:58:57+00:00): Afaik, `name` is the current commonly used name. Being commonly used has nothing to do with using standard romanisation. As long as "Dit Sei Kau" is the popular English name, even if it is caused by an error or a typo, it should still be used.

Languages (including vocabularies and proper nouns) can (and do) change, and in this case your edit in 2019 was influential enough to modify the actual name. If you wanted to revert it to "Tit", you should have done so before "Dit" became the popular name. But now it's too late, and the change should be respected.
Kovoschiz (2025-09-16 07:11:50+00:00): How about `*:yue-Latn=` for both?
flohoff (2025-09-29 16:47:41+00:00): Moin,
du hast hier einfach landuses übereinander gestapelt - landuse in landuse - Das geht nicht - Ein quadratmeter kann nur einen landuse haben und das ist hier alles residential. Dementsprechend ist das ein semantischer fehler.

landuse=greenery ist dazu IMHO noch falsch - denn das sind die Gärten der Häuser - also landuse=residential.

UND - das area=yes ist auf einem landuse quatsch.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1430121222

Führt dann dazu das das in meinem checker rot wird die ganzen flächen.

landuse= ist für micromapping in dieser Art nicht geeignet.

https://osm.zz.de/dbview/?db=landuseoverlap-nrw&layer=overlap#51.90595,8.37446,17z
stirps (2025-09-30 17:05:14+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis, das hatte ich nicht bedacht. Ich habe die von dir angesprochenen Flächen mal zu landcover=soundso verändert. 
Bzgl landcover=greenery nördlich des Platzes sind das glaube ich keine Gärten, sie sind zumindest im Liegenschaftskataster nicht als solche eingezeichnet. Nach dem was ich gesehen habe sind dort wirklich nur Büsche und Bäume. Ich hoffe, dass das jetzt so in Ordnung ist?
Auf jeden Fall auch danke für den Link zum checker, da werde ich mal öfter draufschauen.
❤️‍🔥 (2025-09-16 11:51:44+00:00): Hi, this is unlikely to solve the problem. It would be better to raise this issue with the developers of OsmAnd over at https://github.com/osmandapp/OsmAnd
machihime (2025-09-16 05:09:23+00:00): https://banjarbaruklik.com/sempat-ditutup-jalan-kartika-kini-diberlakukan-satu-arah-khusus-roda-dua/
mavl (2025-09-16 13:09:09+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок добавляет для точки интереса адрес "улица 6 микрорайон" (тег addr:street=6 микрорайон).  
"6 микрорайон" - это не улица.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%90%D0%B4%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%B0
user_5359 (2025-09-16 09:54:52+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node osm.org/node/9772399321 more than 100 meters over streets and buildings.
I moved the node back to the original position.
rskedgell (2025-09-16 08:29:52+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for updating this.

Although adding bicycle=no etc. to footpaths tagged as highway=footway doesn't do any harm, it also doesn't really have any effect on routing software which uses OSM data. The implied access restrictions for a footway already exclude all other transport modes. If people are cycling on these paths, they probably haven't been sent that way as a result of access tagging in OSM.

There are times when it can be worth adding bicycle=no, particularly when this is made explicit by a sign. In this case you can also add bicycle:signed=yes (this is what the StreetComplete app does).

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#United_Kingdom
sheldonelectric (2026-02-02 10:52:39+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13146402058 έχω 1 χρόνο να περάσω από το σημείο, το χρωματοπωλείο έχει κλείσει; ή μήπως είναι διπλοκαταχώρηση του ήδη υπάρχοντως ξυλουργείου;
blu256 (2026-02-03 09:37:05+00:00): Δυστυχώς δε γνωρίζω γιατί από την Εθνικής Αντιστάσεως που διέρχομαι εγώ σχετικά συχνά στο σημείο αυτό δεν έχω ορατότητα.
sheldonelectric (2026-02-03 09:47:44+00:00): Τότε μάλλον θα είδες την πίσω επιγραφή... Το διόρθωσα.
blu256 (2026-02-03 10:33:27+00:00): Οκ!
NeisBot (2025-09-16 04:10:35+00:00): Hi RKhabib, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 379 building(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=171992709
Taya_S (2025-09-16 08:13:58+00:00): Hello RKhabib, 

You deleted a large number of objects in this changeset and then subsequently added new ones in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171992744

However there are some issues with that changeset. Namely:
* There is no source listed
* All buildings are part of a gigantic unneccecary 4213 member relation
* The individual building outlines all have the nonsensical tag `Id=0`
* You have not adjusted any of the previously mapped roads, which now overlap with the buildings.

Is this some sort of import? if so, what is the source of this import and can we use their data?

Best regard, 
Taya Snijder
RKhabib (2025-09-17 07:14:23+00:00): Hi Taya Snijder 
The deleted building area was replaced with a building area obtained directly in the field. We took samples directly from the replaced building. Therefore, I deleted the old building and replaced it with a valid building area.
Taya_S (2025-09-17 07:35:25+00:00): Thank you for your response  RKhabib,

Please in the future list the sources you used in the changeset. 

Furthermore, it is generally encouraged to not delete old data and replace it but rather update the existing data. So please be mindful of that. 

And also please do not create relations for buildings like you've done now.Both https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19610655 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19607211 should be deleted. Each individual building should just be tagged on its own with no relation at all.

Please also explain what you mean by "id=0" which you've added to all the buildings (Example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1430433074)

Best regards,
Taya Snijder
RKhabib (2025-09-17 08:00:44+00:00): Thank you for the information.

And for the updated data, I can't upload my survey data directly to JOSM. If so, the existing building data will overlap with mine. What's the solution?
Taya_S (2025-09-17 08:18:21+00:00): The normal workflow would be to just adjust the existing objects instead of replacing them with new ones. 

You always have to be mindful of already existing data. Otherwise you might end up with situations like this, where a previously mapped road overlaps with newly added buildings https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1115154608
Taya_S (2025-09-18 08:33:18+00:00): I have removed the relations and the id=0 tags in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172100209
user_18023081 (2025-09-16 10:02:23+00:00): Why did you put all these buildings in a single relation? Just WHY?
RKhabib (2025-09-16 10:13:12+00:00): because I digitized this building using the latest image map, I placed this building in one relation because I digitized it according to the boundaries of the area.
RKhabib (2025-09-16 10:15:04+00:00): I deleted the old building data in OSM, and replaced it with the latest, based on the latest image maps and data retrieval, directly from real-time data in the field.
LordGarySugar (2025-09-16 12:10:45+00:00): None of these buildings are rendering now because they're tagged incorrectly - each building should have building=yes. The relation containing all the buildings is incorrect and should be deleted.
Taya_S (2025-09-16 12:11:41+00:00): What "latest image maps and data retrieval" did you use?
user_18023081 (2025-09-17 21:07:25+00:00): ...no reply

😐
NeisBot (2025-09-16 05:09:40+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
pitscheplatsch (2025-09-26 13:56:53+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/172063498
machihime (2025-09-16 05:17:28+00:00): Mobil gak bakal bisa keluar karena ada bollard beton di gerbang. Mobil yg terlanjur masuk harus mundur jauh melewati jembatan sampai tanah kosong agar bisa putar balik.
VLD549 (2025-10-04 16:51:56+00:00): Hi, I was asked to verify name changes.
Could you provide a link of some sort that shows the name change to be from Boschendal Avenue to Boschendal? I can't find it. Thank you!
rskedgell (2025-09-16 07:55:25+00:00): Looking at the tags you've added in this changeset, I think there may be a couple of problems.

1) access=no + motor_vehicle=permit means that the road may not be used by *any* means of transport other than motor vehicles with a permit which "is ordinarily granted". This seems unlikely. You've added permit=residents, but if this really were the case the only access tags you'd need would be:
motor_vehicle=private + private=residents
I can't find any traffic orders which restrict access to Thorney Street. I'll be running nearby tomorrow and will check what signs (if any) are in place at Thorney Street's junctions with Millbank and Horseferry Road.

2) The tagging which you've used for parking restrictions was deprecated at the end of 2022. Please could you adapt this to the current scheme described at
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Street_parking
World_Winner (2025-09-17 11:51:55+00:00): Hi rskedgell,
Thank you for your valuable feedback. I’m going ahead and applying the current tagging scheme for streetside parking regulations: parking:both:restriction:conditional=no_parking @ (Mo-Fr 08:30-18:30)
For the access restrictions, we received user feedback saying Thorney Street should be restricted to residents only across its complete length, and I would be grateful to hear your input after checking the location physically.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-09-16 05:50:59+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13040656704
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13040656705
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1430148695
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1430148694

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Gregory Peony (2025-09-17 05:34:11+00:00): Hi, you mapped a few yards as buildings here. Note the direction in which shadows are cast and what is casting them. Using Bing as a supporting source in this area is very helpful; please read my project comments if you haven't already. 

You mapped a dupliacte footprint here, please modify features if you can tell what it represents rather than deleting and re-mapping. Do not apply layer tags to features to make overlap warnings go away, instead resolved the root cause of the problem.

Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
rhhs (2025-09-16 18:44:07+00:00): Good news that it started, it is badly needed! Do you know how long it is expected to take? (considering https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_map_temporary_events_and_temporary_features )
m_zahariev (2025-09-16 19:19:47+00:00): The official information says until 31. October in that direction. Afterwards if the weather conditions allow it, the construction will be carried out in the opposite direction as well.
rhhs (2025-09-16 19:33:01+00:00): Then maybe it's not a good idea to edit the map for it. Users of OSM data often update their information infrequently, so if they update it now, it may take several weeks before they update it again and in the meantime their maps will show it as a road under construction while the remont is already finished.
NeisBot (2025-09-16 06:36:40+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
CoolBreeze HVAC Solutions (2025-09-16 06:50:32+00:00): Yes, I would love to change them as the policy guidelines.
pitscheplatsch (2025-09-26 13:56:08+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/172487379
rempshaener (2025-09-17 16:29:50+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.
Ich habe eine Anmerkung zu deinen Anpassungen: Hydranten sollten nicht mit Straßen, Gebäuden u. ä. verbunden werden. Das lässt sich leicht beheben: im Editor markieren und „E“ drücken – das löst den Hydranten von der Linie. Die betroffenen Objekte findest du hier:

https://overpass-turbo.eu/?Q=%5Bout%3Ajson%5D%3B%0Aarea%5Bname%3D%22Deutschland%22%5D%3B%0Away%5Bhighway%5D%28area%29%28user%3AFFErasbach%29%20-%3E%20.highways%3B%0Anode%5B%22emergency%22%3D%22fire_hydrant%22%5D%28w.highways%29%3B%0A%28._%3B%3E%3B%29%3B%0Aout%3B&C=49.149159%3B11.413325%3B16&R=

Vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag und weiterhin viel Spaß beim Mappen.
Viele Grüße
Sakari_N (2025-10-09 18:19:45+00:00): Moi, onko tähän rakennettu tällainen kävelytie, kun ei missään ilmakuvissa tai streetside-kuvissa näy?
NeisBot (2025-09-16 07:00:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
pitscheplatsch (2025-09-26 13:55:27+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/172063989
Taksine (2025-11-15 10:50:00+00:00): This is China. The main name tag should be written in Chinese, and the English name should be written in the name:en tag.
eggie (2025-09-16 07:49:21+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Gregory Peony (2025-10-29 03:51:33+00:00): Hi, it looks like you added and invalid layer tag here. Pleas read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer to better understand its use.
eggie (2025-09-16 07:51:16+00:00): Dag wl  Een adres is niet nodig. Er zijn al adresnodes.
MVG
eggie
wl058 (2025-09-16 07:57:37+00:00): Helemaal goed, ik zag de invulvelden staan, vandaar :)
eggie (2025-09-16 08:04:56+00:00): Yep...  Editor iD is internationaal geörienteerd. In Nederland worden alle gebouwen en adresnodes geïmporteerd vanuit de BAG.
Het lijkt erop dat het voorgaande pand nog in het Kadaster (BAG) staat. Je zou een terugmelding kunnen doen.
Vaak komen bij updates de oude vormen weer terug.
Overkappingen staat niet in de BAG.
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/?searchQuery=De+gavere+29&objectId=1701010000218393&theme=BRT+Achtergrond&geometry.x=213312.66650573362&geometry.y=549104.4792184333&zoomlevel=15.288

Groet
eggie
TrickyFoxy (2025-09-16 10:43:25+00:00): в в start_date попал другой тег
kosmgeolan (2025-09-17 08:34:29+00:00): Здравствуйте. Что должно стоять в тэгах? Я пока не увидела проблему
TrickyFoxy (2025-09-17 14:24:54+00:00): Сейчас уже исторавил. Во второй версии линии можно увидеть, что в значение start_date пробрался другой тег https://osm.org/way/406458124/history
kosmgeolan (2025-09-18 01:05:08+00:00): Спасибо огромное! Буду внимательнее
NorthCrab_upload (2025-09-16 08:00:49+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2766016763
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/337931789

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
natus86 (2025-09-16 20:42:28+00:00): Please don't create changesets on such a big area
NeisBot (2025-09-16 08:03:40+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
pitscheplatsch (2025-09-26 13:55:07+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/172063161
stragu (2025-09-17 07:22:47+00:00): congrats on the 172 millionth changeset!
Cyrille37 (2025-09-16 14:14:39+00:00): L'ajout de "expressway=yes" sur un "highway=primary" ne change pas le rendu.
NeisBot (2025-09-16 08:18:40+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
pitscheplatsch (2025-09-26 13:54:35+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/172092529
janhals (2025-09-16 08:21:45+00:00): Toelichting: het bord verplicht fietspad staat, komende uit de richting Sluiskil, pas net voorbij de brug van Sluiskil.
eggie (2025-09-16 09:45:20+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
mavl (2025-09-16 13:13:45+00:00): Здравствуйте. Вы уже добавили этот объект ранее.  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13146354101/history  
  
Для чего нужен второй?
village (2025-09-28 16:01:19+00:00): Du hast - sicher nicht absichtlich - mit dieser Änderung https://osm.org/node/73656251 (Teil der Uferlinie) mitten in die Lauer verschoben: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=172001700 
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/node/73656251  (wenn Version 7 auch dort sichtbar ist) 
Ich hab's korrigiert https://osm.org/changeset/172572957

Die Liste der geänderten Objekte vor dem Abschluss genau anzusehen kann helfen, soetwas zu vermeiden.
custodiankeyy (2025-09-16 19:25:21+00:00): Uhud ve Türker Sokak resmiyette yaya öncelikli yol olarak mı geçiyor? Neden living_street olarak işaretlediniz?
eulersequation (2025-09-16 19:52:53+00:00): Açıkçası resmi haritada sokağa özel bir tanım yapılmamış. Ancak orada bulunduğum sürede, sokakta çocukların oynadığını ve zeminin parke taşı döşenmiş olduğu gözlemledim. Bu sebeple, living_street tanımının residential'a kıyasla daha uygun olduğunu düşünüyorum.
girak-ropeway (2025-09-16 15:30:41+00:00): Gute Ergänzungen am Dach, das die beiden eigentlichen Stationen verbindet. Es fehlen jedoch die eigentlichen Stationen, die mit aerialway=station bezeichnet sein sollten. Und was hat es mit dem großen quadratförmigen Gebäude mit layer=-1 auf sich?
bastibay (2025-09-18 06:45:54+00:00): Das südliche Gebilde mit -1 ist die Bodenplatte. Die eigentlichen Stationen sind auch nur Dächer und kommen noch.
Abgesehen davon warten wir doch mal ein aktuelles Orthofoto ab, das noch dauern kann. Ist ja nur eine ungefähre Darstellung.