piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Gregory Peony (2025-03-27 23:10:04+00:00): Basically all footprints here are valid and accurate. Please use the replace geometry tool (ctrl+shift+g) or conflation plugin to preserve history rather than deleting features and re drawing them. They weren't here for long this time around but keep it in mind in future.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164186113
Papymaj (2025-03-27 23:19:16+00:00): Thank you Gregory Peony.
WILCO.
(I was preferring removing the stuff to be able to quickly redraw them; it's easier to me, but i will comply and use this tool. Tank's for your advice).
Gregory Peony (2025-03-28 13:03:42+00:00): It should take a simmilar ammount of time to; one is delete->redraw, the other is (move) redraw->replace. You'll need the utills plugin to do it. Conflation works very well when you need to replace geometry en masse, because you draw geometry on a new data layer meaning that you can temporarily hide the osm data layer allowing you to view the imagery directly. You'll need the conflation plugin to do this, I recommend reading its about pages linked to when installing the plugin and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/Conflation , then opening two new layers in JOSM so that you can freely experiment and play to learn how to use it without worry. It talks about using an external database/source; you'll essencially be creating that footprint database before conflating.
Gregory Peony (2025-03-30 13:35:38+00:00): I don't know why I was under the impression that you were using JOSM. Those tools aren't available in ID. It's easier to work with existing data in JOSM. In ID editor getting familliar with the editing shortcuts can be useful as they contatin functions not referenced in the Help section. Open the shortcut panel by pressing the ? key.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164186113
Papymaj (2025-03-30 14:04:31+00:00): Hello Gregory Peony,
Thank you for your advises.
You'r right, I simply use ID.
But I have heard from JOSM, en installed it on Ubuntu Desktop.
But I have to learn how to work with it.
Your comment is not lost.
I'm in the process to review my tasks (thanks for splitting them).
I do hope that my work will deserve a completion status. But I must admit that, according to the satellite pictures (en also when I'm comparing, with the bings one, I have many doubts about what I see.
Wall and shadow ? Building ? Tree ? Round house ? Not easy, but I do my best...
Gregory Peony (2025-04-03 23:48:12+00:00): I just want to say that even if a task you submitted is invalidated that isn't neccessarily an assessment of the quality of your contributions. Tasks are evaluated for both quality and completeness. One really good indicator of what you're looking at are shadows. Sometimes different imagery sources show shadows being cast in different or even opposite directions, using that fact can help you to better interpret the imagery. I've done some mapping in the NW of this settlement and I'll post an example of my mapping in the project comments section.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164186113
Udarian (2025-03-28 00:52:21+00:00): Why did you remove the traffic light from Northwest 13th Court as I doubt that they would completely remove the traffic light even if there is construction on the road. 
Why did you add the no exit in the middle of the road, those generally only go at the end of a road, if there is a section of Northwest 13th court that is under-construction then that segment should be split and from the rest and tagged as under construction. 
again I have to ask what the source is as allot of the commits on Northwest 13th Court is not on the imagery (aerial or streetside) so there must be some other source.
Rootberg (2025-03-28 11:49:59+00:00): The imagery is out of date and 13th street is no longer accessible from 12th ave. 13th is being taken by the hospital.  There is no light.
Udarian (2025-03-28 18:59:37+00:00): As in they have completely torn down the traffic lights that used to be there, or is it still there. Because unless they are completely removing the road (which I doubt as it is for through traffic very clearly) and placing a building or something like that in its place, there is still going to be traffic lights at this intersection. And I will reiterate that “noexit”’s shouldn’t be placed in the middle of a road as you have.
Udarian (2025-03-28 00:42:44+00:00): whats the source for this, there seems to be some construction in the area but not all the way across the canal to Nothwest 13th Court.
EvanSiroky (2025-04-02 01:07:26+00:00): I hadn't heard of this editor before, so I tried it out and it's pretty neat! Thanks for mapping in my area!
KingKratos (2025-04-02 01:10:57+00:00): Evan dont push upload more then 100, as around there it sometimes does upload and you will have to start all over
EvanSiroky (2025-04-02 02:21:13+00:00): Haha, ok. I'll try to keep the edits somewhat light.
Allison P (2025-04-02 02:59:03+00:00): This happened to me a few years ago when I was at around 120. I still haven't gone back to try again.
ChrissW-R1 (2025-03-27 23:09:41+00:00): source of map in Saerbeck: https://mapillary.com/app/?pKey=306801544179135
5m4u9 (2025-03-30 21:03:06+00:00): Hola, bienvenid@! Gracias por actualizar las calles del barrio y de la rotonda que añadiste.
SomeoneElse (2025-03-27 23:48:15+00:00): Near Yarm, from survey 27/3/2025
maplemoths (2025-03-30 00:45:17+00:00): Whoops

did not mean for this to go along for the whole front range, apologies
os-emmer (2025-03-30 15:39:05+00:00): Hello Vanessamaxwell and welcome to OSM! I found some disaster-response-stations you added here. Can you maybe explain to me what exactly this place is?
Currently there are a lot of disaster response stations mapped next to each other. Is that realy the case or is it one big station of some kind? What is this place called?
caseywittmier (2025-03-28 00:07:37+00:00): North May Road as well.
Allison P (2025-03-28 15:58:25+00:00): Western Collective is a brewpub: https://www.westerncollective.beer/
kartler175 (2025-03-30 14:37:39+00:00): Which properties qualify https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/212569318 as a motorway (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmotorway)?
Benoît C MdP (2025-04-02 14:43:39+00:00): Bonjour josmougn,

Peut on savoir un peu plus sur cette "modification de l'itinéraire de la Véloscenie" par Thalès ? 

Merci

Benoît
josmougn (2025-04-02 20:35:23+00:00): Bonsoir Benoit, 
En savoir plus sur quoi exactement ?
Benoît C MdP (2025-04-03 06:59:11+00:00): Bonjour josmougn,

Sur ton commentaire de changeset "initial Jouy-en-Josas itinéraire Véloscénie modifié par Thalès",
Je constate qu'il y a un itinéraire alternatif qui passe notamment ici et qui n'est pas référencé sur le site officiel https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/600380821

Benoît
josmougn (2025-04-03 12:48:32+00:00): Si je comprends bien ta question ne porte pas sur le nouveau tracé à Jouy du côté de Thalès Université mais sur les 2 alternatives plus loin à l'ouest, la plus ancienne par Guyancourt et la plus récente par Toussus.
Sur le terrain les 2 sont jalonnées et elles figurent toutes deux sur le site veloscenie.com (avec quelques erreurs quand on zoome, habituelles sur ce site).
Elles sont aussi sur les panneaux d'information comme celui-ci à Buc : https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1758566754695175&lat=48.76794431051&lng=2.1299460736771&z=17&focus=photo
José
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-05 05:33:17+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164536247
NeisReview (2025-03-28 06:21:18+00:00): #UnexplainedChanges

Hello, welcome to OSM.

Could you please clarify the purpose behind your map changes? It's not entirely clear from the edited data and your added description. Also, what was used as a source of your activity?

Looking forward to your response. 
Thank you.
NeisRevert (2025-03-28 06:21:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/164192571 where the changeset comment is: 
Remove vandalism
Orblivion (2025-03-28 01:14:01+00:00): I should have noted - I split the building into parts because the old part was the old Strafford court house. I don't think the new part was.
Filip009CZ (2026-05-05 13:49:58+00:00): Ahoj, prosím nedávaj amenity=fuel aj na okolie čerpacej stanice https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1372231274, pokiaľ už je na budove čerpacej stanice (alebo na bode).
aharvey (2025-03-28 10:42:42+00:00): I added a landuse=brownfield to indicate what's there now, but I'm just going of Esri World Imagery, nut sure if construction has started?
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-06 06:13:28+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164575641
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-06 06:13:29+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164575641
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-05 05:34:08+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164536259
hoserab (2025-03-28 19:26:12+00:00): 🩸🫀🫁🧟🧠💀

("gore")

🙃
Hufkratzer (2025-03-28 20:19:45+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1372249131 is not a horse riding centre; it is just a horse riding arena. In OSM such arenas are usually tagged with leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian. See also:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a#Riding_centre_(equestrian)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/854412537#map=16/-34.80822/138.80594&layers=P (example)
nrs19 (2025-04-01 03:42:34+00:00): Thanks for the advice. Fixed.
greyim (2025-04-22 00:21:46+00:00): Hi I wonder were any streams in Tasmania reverted I notice many gone since last looked end Feb25
cheers Graham Alex TAS
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-22 00:49:01+00:00): Hi Graham. By "streams" do you mean creeks? If so, then probably not by this revert, as everything here was power related.
NeisBot (2025-03-28 04:36:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2025-04-06 17:49:02+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/164602867
geisthugo123 (2025-04-03 15:46:21+00:00): Hi und danke für den Edit.
Du hast das Conatianergebäude 56a an der Alten Dieburger Straße zu einem verdächtigen Dreieck verformt.
Sind die jetzt wirklich so oder war das ausversehen?
Viele Grüße
geisthugo123 (2025-04-20 17:38:34+00:00): Wie siehts aus?
Viele Grüße
NeisBot (2025-03-28 05:00:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment
NeisReview (2025-04-06 17:53:32+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/164603059
Neonf (2025-04-24 09:58:43+00:00): Dude, you did wrong revert. It's actual roads
Grab_Cong (2025-04-28 02:44:04+00:00): Hi Neonf, I wanted to let you know that I've reverted most of my edits based on the mapping you did earlier and confirmed with my recent survey. I initially focused only on Esri World Imagery, which led to the incorrect revert. Thanks for your understanding, and happy mapping!
mavl (2025-05-13 15:04:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
NeisBot (2025-03-28 05:42:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2025-04-06 17:53:00+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164378301
Lyon-St-Clair (2025-03-28 21:26:54+00:00): Je sais pas si c'est ton action qui a fait ça mais la ligne n'apparaissait plus
mga_geo (2025-03-29 07:12:44+00:00): Cette ligne n'est pas en service actuellement !
Lyon-St-Clair (2025-03-30 21:52:33+00:00): Certes mais on va pas s'amuser à supprimer/remettre la ligne deux fois par an ? On le fait pas pour les 2xx donc pourquoi pour la API ? J'ai jamais vu ça ailleurs
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-06 06:13:30+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164575641
Stalker61 (2025-04-07 17:27:26+00:00): А по какому праву стал массово удаляться тег building=*? Это уважаемый равносильно вандализму.  Второй момент. Не надо тягать без необходимости уже "привязанные" объекты (дороги, здания и т.п.). Выполняйте смещение снимка подложки на ближайший перекресток улиц (дорог)
Stalker61 (2025-04-07 17:32:56+00:00): В тег name=* не вносите описания типа хозздание и т.п.
rempshaener (2025-03-28 20:06:28+00:00): Hallo,

du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.

Eines vorweg: wenn alles erledigt ist, könntest du auch noch den Hinweis https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4280654 schließen

Zu den einzelnen Gebäuden:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1223469695 
- Du könntest das fixme noch entfernen
- Bei emergency=ambulance_station bin ich skeptisch. Eingebürgert hat sich eine Deutung im Sinne von RTW/NEF, siehe auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:emergency%3Dambulance_station: „This isn't the same thing as patient transport used to transfer patients from one hospital to another. Patient transport vehicles aren't usually capable of responding to emergency call outs and are usually housed at hospitals.“ Auch wenn es dabei eher um Sekundärtransporte geht: letztlich wird auf das „responding to emergency call outs“ abgestellt. Ich persönlich tendiere gegen ein emergency=ambulance_station, kenne aber auch kein besseres Tagging.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1223469694
- Du könntest das fixme noch entfernen
- Zum einen ist das building=fire_station nicht richtig, zum anderen betrifft es nur die Gebäudebeschreibung. Richtig wäre aus meiner Sicht ein emergency=disaster_response

Bei Fragen bitte melden.
Viele Grüße
Jaiden1254 (2025-03-28 06:10:35+00:00): I put it on my diary
Allison P (2025-03-28 17:07:11+00:00): You should tag each side separately. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/8961675 only has a sidewalk on one side.
Allison P (2025-03-28 17:08:30+00:00): Overpass is a really inefficient way to do this. You should look into spatial joins.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2025-03-28 20:58:07+00:00): Reverted

1) Please don't addresses into name
2) Both of those buildings have correct address, contact Facebook if you think they handle multiple addresses incorrectly.

Please refer to the wiki

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2025-03-28 20:58:21+00:00): * Please don't put addresses into name
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 05:28:02+00:00): DWG revert - sock-puppet account

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164402167
fortera_au (2025-03-28 07:00:29+00:00): Hi, the new highway way here doesn't seem to match up to the imagery listed as used.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164192709
Ky_AT (2025-03-28 16:05:14+00:00): Hi  fortera_au, 

Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you.
Ky_AT (2025-04-01 13:56:23+00:00): Hi fortera_au, Thank you for your observation. I created the missing way as there are painted markings visible in the latest Esri world imagery at -31.9532693, 115.9841392.  I also referred to recent TomTom propriatory traces at this location to support the way's existence here and westerly beyond the road markings I refer to.
cupcake_munster (2025-03-28 13:13:47+00:00): Primary Road Description from OSM:
A highway linking large towns. In cities, a major arterial road. 
The municipality of North Bay classifies many of the roads that were primary as primary. Please refer  to https://northbaygis.maps.arcgis.com/apps/View/index.html?appid=61e4e5deae50481cb45bee4497ee15eb and revert needed changes.
cupcake_munster (2025-03-28 13:14:14+00:00): ***primary as arterial***
BCNorwich (2025-03-29 07:19:15+00:00): Duplicated university deleted, grounds alreaddy mapped. House tagged correctly.
joel56dt (2025-03-28 16:13:01+00:00): Hi QuigleyJones,
I have made the same mistake, which is how I learned this: short service roads for buses like this are not busways. See the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dbusway#What_is_not_a_busway

Thanks,
Joel
Stalker61 (2025-04-07 17:16:41+00:00): Молодец. Что за хамство в маппинге?  Тег building=* следовало привести к виду was:building=*? а не сносить все в подряд.
JassKurn (2025-03-28 19:04:55+00:00): Hi Wilpin,

There's a few tags that appear left behind from the construction phase. Can these be deleted? Haven't been in that area for ages so not sure of what it looks like now.
wilpin (2025-03-28 19:13:06+00:00): Yes, construction is complte, so please feel free to remove any 'left overs'
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 05:28:03+00:00): DWG revert - sock-puppet account

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164402167
NeisBot (2025-03-28 07:15:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2025-04-06 17:52:03+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/164602991
NeisBot (2025-03-28 17:18:03+00:00): Hi TheAhmet 2, and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

I've noticed that over the past few hours, you've made several changesets with comments that might be unclear or difficult to understand.

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good changeset comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments.

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment
Fizzie-DWG (2025-03-29 02:45:07+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17474
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-05 05:34:09+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164536259
BCNorwich (2025-03-29 07:11:28+00:00): Duplication, changeset reverted.
citrula (2025-03-28 13:49:21+00:00): Can you explain why you deleted this crossing? It looks like it was tagged correctly to me (uncontrolled crossing with no markings or signal)
Fizzie-DWG (2025-03-29 01:49:04+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17472
s777n (2025-04-02 21:00:35+00:00): Непохоже что в этом месте есть лесопилка. Удалил.
BCNorwich (2025-03-29 07:05:21+00:00): Hi, This changeset has been reverted because it only adds duplicated highways and fictional names. Please don't add your personal routes/features/notes to the OSM database as it disrupts routing.

You're welcome to add genuine, on-the-ground, and verifiable features as per OSM best practice and guidelines.

Regards Bernard.
Stalker61 (2025-04-07 16:48:44+00:00): Адреску тоже необходимо восстанавливать правильно, а не абы как.
SekeRob (2025-03-29 05:31:55+00:00): Hi,

This is flagged as building on building. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164195644 Cycle by here often. Not seen such a big building arrise here. Think it has to be changed to landuse=military and alligned to the fencing.
MarcoR (2025-03-29 06:31:33+00:00): Hi,
thanks for bringing this to my attention :)
This happens when you rely too much on iD presets...
I've removed the building tag and added landuse=military; feel free to improve the shape of the outline

Happy mapping,
Marco
NeisBot (2025-03-28 08:12:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment
NeisReview (2025-03-31 19:51:42+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164291064
kmpoppe_repair (2025-04-10 11:26:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 164763734 where the changeset comment is: Reverting undiscussed mass edits to shops in Germany that add mostly incorrect addresses
Arlo James Barnes (2025-04-30 10:08:32+00:00): Thanks. Could you add the `operator` tag if known?
BCNorwich (2025-03-29 07:07:42+00:00): Duplication, changeset reverted.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-03-29 01:43:17+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17466
Gregory Peony (2025-05-01 04:59:47+00:00): Hi, it's awesome if you're adding data you have seen for yourself. When this is the case and you want to let others know use source=survey instead of 'on_the_ground'. You can also add this source tag to your changsets (in the same place the imagery sources are in JOSM on upload).
ilias_ (2025-03-28 12:01:39+00:00): You edited 2 nodes in Canada and one in Australia, your changeset covers half the planet.
mavl (2025-05-13 15:05:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
mavl (2025-05-13 15:06:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
szydzio (2025-03-28 08:49:20+00:00): Zmiany przedyskutowane w wątku https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/do-poznaniakow-i-okolicy/75596/167
NeisReview (2025-03-29 06:58:41+00:00): #AutomatedEdit

Hi, welcome to OSM!

I noticed that your recent changesets include many features with similar tagging patterns. To help the community better understand your edits, could you share a bit more about the sources and tools you used for these updates?

I appreciate your contributions and look forward to your response.

Thanks!
c62999y (2025-03-31 05:50:02+00:00): Hello NeisReview,
I noticed that the riding arenas weren't listed as accessible. However, since the riding arenas aren't public, we've set them all to private. I hope this is okay.
Regards
habi (2025-11-04 14:28:27+00:00): Ciao Mr. Spock
Genau wie in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164327744 geschrieben gilt auch hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1372283634 heisst nicht Baumplantage und ist ein Wald, sondern ist eine Baumplantage.
Ich habe das in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174196660 angepasst.
Gruss,
habi