piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
YomanNH (2024-07-29 08:35:21+00:00): Cześć,

ciągi pieszo-rowerowe mapujemy jako highway=path + bicycle=designated + foot=designated. Jest to opisane tu: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Rowery#Drogi_dla_pieszych_i_rower%C3%B3w

Obecne tagowanie wskazuje, że są to jedynie chodniki, po których dopuszczone jest poruszanie się na rowerze.

Pozdrawiam
k2101 (2024-07-29 08:42:21+00:00): Dziękuję za informację. 

Wiem o tym tagowaniu i je poprawię.

Obecne oznaczenie wynikało z prowadzonych na rondzie prac, było tymczasowe. 

Również łączę pozdrowienia
eggie (2024-07-23 11:35:36+00:00): Volgens mij gaat het prima. 
Wanneer je zoals hier correct de adresnode bewerkt en/of combineerd  zijn al die wijzigingen oke.
Groet
eggie
Frans S (2024-07-23 10:09:07+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------

A: Inaccurate mapping.

C: Collecting adjacent buildings and mapped is as 1 building.
E: Buildings not squared.
Buildings need to be tagged as building=yes.

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154296402
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-08-12 17:42:12+00:00): Jesteś pewien że ten budynek to ma 10cm wysokości? Wydaje się to dość mało prawdopodobne

http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=154296671

Jest też dyskusja na https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mapowanie-pod-render-3d/117355
Gregory Peony (2024-10-28 17:57:40+00:00): These footprints are valid and appropriately squared, but they are oversized. Accurate footprinst are important, because they are used for population estimates. Oversized buildings will also likely lead ot overmapps and common nodes in dense areas. map ~95% of the roof sized to give yourself margin when squaring. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154296675
LockOnGuy (2024-07-23 11:15:23+00:00): Hello again farhadGuli, please use a good changeset comment as "simple edits , Update" do not help other mappers understand your edit.    
It doesn't matter how simple your edit, you should say what you edited and why.    
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
DaveF (2024-07-24 09:29:19+00:00): Hello, again.
Good to see you amending exiting objects, but as there are four platforms they should be split & given individual refs or at least given multiple refs eg ref=3,4
Syl (2024-10-30 16:22:25+00:00): Bonjour, il reste des infos du précédent commerce, elles sont toujours valides ?
bikepunk2 (2024-11-10 09:57:57+00:00): tout à fait, j'ai vérifié tout est exact
eggie (2024-07-23 11:33:39+00:00): Hoi,
Wanneer er een bord voetgangersgebied staat dan is het correct gemapt.
maxspeed 30 is dat hier ook van toepassing. Zou kunnen. 

Groet
eggie
eggie (2024-07-23 10:10:51+00:00): Hoi   Hier is iets niet helemaal goed gegaan.
Je edits.. 
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=154297702

warnings:crossing_ways:highway-highway
  	2

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-07-23 10:13:39+00:00): Ik heb even wat uit de knoop gehaald. Denk dat het nu oke is. 
Het fietspad heb ik verbonden met het vlak highway=pedestrian
FLupie (2024-07-23 10:13:48+00:00): Ik zal eens kijken of ik het kan corrigeren.
FLupie (2024-07-23 10:15:54+00:00): Okay. Dank je wel.
eggie (2024-07-23 10:17:21+00:00): Ik heb het even zelf gedaan want de 'fout'maakt deel uit van een fiets- en wandelroute en die kun je niet splitsen met editor iD. Wel met JOSM.
FLupie (2024-07-23 10:27:12+00:00): De rotonde en weg die net iets noordelijker ligt (Tolhuislaan en Brede Hilledijk) is ook opnieuw ingericht en moet aangepast worden. Die maakt deel uit van een busroute. Die kan dan ook alleen in JOSM aangepast worden?
eggie (2024-07-23 10:38:46+00:00): Yep   ... als je gaat knippen in die OV route 77 dan gaat het stuk met editor iD.
iD zet dan het routedeel helemaal achterin de riedel van de route.
JOSM kan het wel.
Maar wellicht kun je het aanpassen zonder te knippen.
Wanneer je mutaties los staan van de route dan kun je het gewoon aanpassen.
Mocht iets fout gaan en je komt er niet uit kan ik het wel aanpassen.
Wel eerst de routes laden in de editor voordat je gaat knippen.
 
editor josm stap voor stap 

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/editor-josm-stap-voor-stap/75047 

'k Zie dat de verbinding met het osm forum er even uitligt. Wellicht doet ie het straks weer.
Succes
trial (2024-07-24 17:43:03+00:00): Bonjour, j'aurais tendance à conserver le nom du commerce dans old_name :
old_name=L'atelier du sandwich
La boutique peut rester connnue sous l'ancien om pendant un certain temps. Sans doute plus pour un restaurant que pour une sandwicherie.
nuitsfauves (2024-07-24 19:17:44+00:00): En effet, j’aurais dû ! J’y penserai la prochaine fois :)
trial (2024-07-24 19:38:46+00:00): C'était bien le but du commentaire (mais tu aurais pu avoir de bonnes raisons de ne pas le faire, je préférais demander). J'ai mis à jour en conséquence.
eggie (2024-07-23 11:20:39+00:00): Dag Serbu,
Verkeerd is het niet, maar er zijn wel bezwaren. Je hebt het overigens netjes ingetekend. 
Gebruikelijk is om de tagging van die langsliggende trottoirs op te nemen in de tagging van het naastliggen fietspad met sidewalk=right  (of soms left)

Die aparte voetpaden routeren namelijk niet naar behoren. Je stapt immers zo van het trottoir op het fietspad. Op de kaart kan dat nu niet.
Overigens gaat het met de routering voor voetgangers wel goed hier, want er zijn voldoende verbindingen.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-07-23 11:27:40+00:00): ... en bij de Kapteynweg kun je dus niet (meer)  van het voetpad Galileilaan oversteken aan de westzijde. 
Dat ging zonder die trottoirs nog wel.
eggie (2024-07-23 11:31:12+00:00): Ik heb een aparte voetgangersoversteek gemaakt.. hoewel sidewalk=right al op het fietspad stond.

Op de fietspaden staat overigens al sidewalk = right. Het was zonder die aparte trottoirs al correct gemapt hier.
Serbul (2024-07-23 21:46:12+00:00): Hartelijk dank voor de recensie, Eggie. Ik kende alleen de optie om 'sidewalk=right' te markeren niet.
Serbul (2024-07-23 21:49:43+00:00): Hartelijk dank voor de recensie, Eggie. Ik kende alleen de optie om 'stoep=rechts' te markeren niet. Ik vind het niet erg om mijn wijzigingen te verwijderen als je dat overdreven vindt.
eggie (2024-07-24 04:56:00+00:00): Hoi..  nee laat maar gewoon staan.
Er s geen duidelijke consensus.. maar ga svp niet heel Dordt voorzien van aparte trottoirs 😀
In Wilgenwende zat ik ook te twijfelen hoe het aan te pakken.. maar daar lopen deels groenstroken afgewisseld met parkeervakken.
Daar heb ik dan wel een apart trottoir ingetekend. In de sterrenburgtunnel met alleen een langsliggend trottoir met opzet niet.
Het mag dus op beide manieren.

Using just the sidewalk=* tag without drawing the actual sidewalks is called the "refinement of the highway" approach. Alternatively, sidewalks can be mapped as separate footways, see Sidewalks for details on this distinction.
eggie (2024-07-24 04:57:07+00:00): Zie wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sidewalk
eggie (2024-07-24 05:08:42+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/51.77006/4.65974&layers=PN

Wilgenwende.. dat eigenlijk officieel Nieuw Groenhoven heet in de Staatscourant. 
Ook zoiets. De Gemeente is z'n eigen besluit vergeten.
Wilgenwende was alleen de projectnaam.
Ik zie dat ik hier ook niet erg consequent ben geweest met de trottoirs maar anders krijg je van die vreemde uitstapjes als je stukken weglaat. 😀
Mapse..
eggie
eggie (2024-07-23 11:12:58+00:00): Dag Leo,

Lijkt me oke. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=154298432

Groet
eggie
eggie (2024-07-23 11:12:01+00:00): Dag Flupie,

Het westelijk hek nog vastmaken aan de steiger.
access=private (Je hebt =no zou ook kunnen)  is voldoende. ... biycle en foot =no hoeft dan niet. 
Groet
eggie
pavvv (2024-07-23 10:54:43+00:00): Numbers written on boundary stones should be a value of ref=*, not name=*.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dboundary_stone
eggie (2024-07-23 11:08:17+00:00): Lijkt me oke.
gr eggie
Frans S (2024-07-23 10:17:17+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
2 buildings mapped.   One is not a building, Check if you see a shadow ? No shadow, mostly not a building. 
The other one is oversized. Extrapolate the roofline where it is hidden by trees. 

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154299285
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-07-29 07:37:51+00:00): Please don't test on the map

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154549342
user_5359 (2025-09-07 12:27:13+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/12069618046. What is the mean of the tag hose = yes?
❤️‍🔥 (2025-09-07 22:21:39+00:00): I was trying to indicate that there is a public water hose attached to this tap - like this thing: https://google.com.au/images?q=garden+water+hose

is there a better tag?
user_5359 (2025-09-08 06:49:54+00:00): Thanks for the explanation. I couldn't find any alternatives in the wiki. The term is only used as a value in emergency contexts. However, I found the node https://www.osm.org/node/5335997412 via taginfo. Would this notation be an alternative?
❤️‍🔥 (2025-09-10 13:02:18+00:00): sure, updated
FRANCH SASU (2024-07-23 10:23:42+00:00): super Jolie travail
tyfi (2024-08-17 23:51:09+00:00): Welcome to OSM! It seems you've tagged your location as a place of worship which is probably not what you intended. Your change also seems to have deleted a residential street named South McCoy.

Let me take a look at this changeset; don't take it personally if I undo it and add your location myself.

Feel free to ask me anything about how OSM works or how to go about a certain kind of change. You can also check the wiki to learn almost anything OSM related: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org
tyfi (2024-08-18 00:46:14+00:00): Hello, it looks like you accidentally untagged the city boundary, moved a street lamp, and deleted a residential road in the process of adding your business location.

I rolled this changeset back and added your location properly in changeset 155393729.
kre777 (2024-07-24 11:40:26+00:00): Hallo wieder mal. Deine Änderungen sind "nicht gelungen".

Der Pfad Brunner Anlage traffic_sign=DE:240 soll: path. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway=path
Der Pfad Brunner Anlage endet direkt auf der Wasserburger Straße nicht auf einem anderen Pfad/Übergang (1303248092).
Der andere Pfad https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1303248092 
- ist nicht traffic_sign:DE:240
- hat eine Ampel also kein crossing:uncontrolled 
- hat nicht crossing:markings:zebra - Zebrastreifen sind nicht vorhanden
- benötigt auch keinen oneway:no Wert (ist dafault)
- ist bereits als Ampel Übergang erfasst: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/278252500 und deshalb durchaus überflüssig.
Ausserdem: Wenn das "Stückchen" Fußweg (1303248093) umbedingt eingetragen sein muß, dann idealerweise wie in der Realität zwischen den Punkten: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/367155120 & https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12026432950 .

Gruß kre777
PedroMTG13 (2024-07-23 17:34:15+00:00): Noah,
Ambas as relações do 8032 tem vias isoladas junto do continente de valongo. Por favor altera
_Noahhhh_ (2024-07-23 18:10:00+00:00): Como assim via isolada, podes explicar?
PedroMTG13 (2024-07-23 19:56:04+00:00): Desculpa ignora o que eu disse, aqui demorou a carregar mas apareceu a relação direita
tyfi (2024-08-18 00:46:17+00:00): Hello, it looks like you accidentally untagged the city boundary, moved a street lamp, and deleted a residential road in the process of adding your business location.

I rolled this changeset back and added your location properly in changeset 155393729.
Gregory Peony (2024-10-26 16:56:41+00:00): A mixed bag, some of the buildnig footprints here are accurate and have been appropriately squared. WAY: 1303252139, WAY: 1303252140 & WAY: 1303252130 are examples of such footprints, please map more like this in future. One of the main errors you have made here seems to stem from trees partially obscuring buildings in the imagery. Do your best to draw the most likely full footprint of buildings partially obscured by trees. Thank you for your contribution.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154301169
Gregory Peony (2024-10-29 22:55:57+00:00): It appears that you accidentally modified a highway causing the changeset to be much larger. Hold alt to prevent your cursor from snapping to nearby elements or filter them out using the map data panel. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154301241
Gregory Peony (2024-10-29 21:01:29+00:00): Good choice of imagery. You identified waterways. Before uploading your changes check that the comment is appropriate; in this case you made no mention of mapping waterways. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154301294
Gregory Peony (2024-10-29 20:25:18+00:00): Press q to square building footprints after tagging. Avoid uploading untagged elements as they will not render in OSM. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154301365
Gregory Peony (2024-10-29 20:32:48+00:00): You correctly drew the way representing the river in the direction of flow. You can use topo maps to to verify this. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154301365
Gregory Peony (2024-10-29 19:50:00+00:00): These footprints should be squared; press q after tagging. WAY: 1303255173 could be a tree becuase the shadow it casts is significantly larger than the adjacent buildings. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154301537
Gregory Peony (2024-10-29 19:38:36+00:00): This footprint should be squared, because it is simply more likely to have square corners in reality than to have this shape. The imagery does not provide strong enough evidence that this building has this shape. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154301610
Gregory Peony (2024-10-29 19:29:11+00:00): Good job, the footprints you've correctly identified buildings in aerial imagery.---The buildings here could be more accurate and should be squared. Press q on your keyboard after tagging an area to do this. You can also see these buildings in mapbox. I rectifiec this in Changeset: 158513673.---Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154301645
eggie (2024-07-23 11:38:25+00:00): Dag Prefix
Je vraagt feedback 
Lijkt me allemaal oke met die kapper.
Eigenlijk hoort bos en gras netjes gescheiden te worden. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-07-23 11:40:06+00:00): Bos en gras heb ik gescheiden. Daar zijn trucjes voor.
Gr eggie
eggie (2024-07-23 11:42:17+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/PolygonCutOut
In editor JOSM kun je plugins laden met gereedschapskisten. Dit is er één van.
MVG
eggie
Prefix0245 (2024-07-23 11:58:22+00:00): Dank voor je hulp!
woodpeck_repair (2024-07-23 11:19:13+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 152996122, 152998781, 153000052, 153125249, 153125489, 153465195, 153465541, 153466424, 153467244, 153498856, 153500156, 153500424, 153500484, 153500666, 153500759, 153505880, 153505909, 153505966, 153506063, 153506332, 153507802, 153508171, 153509735, 153514066, 153545294, 153545903, 153547095, 153551122, 153557896, 153559232, 153585588, 153589589, 153591382, 153600631, 153600836, 153623349, 153647903, 153647925, 153648360, 153648615, 153666744, 153667253, 153667393, 153667834, 153702453, 153705045, 153742604, 153746485, 153747996, 153748727, 153750495, 153754652, 153755068, 153784049, 153818173, 153818862, 153821303, 153854732, 153866445, 153866527, 153894557, 153972413, 154017764, 154060120, 154060202, 154151143, 154176799, 154181806, 154260546.
woodpeck_repair (2024-07-23 11:19:12+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 152996122, 152998781, 153000052, 153125249, 153125489, 153465195, 153465541, 153466424, 153467244, 153498856, 153500156, 153500424, 153500484, 153500666, 153500759, 153505880, 153505909, 153505966, 153506063, 153506332, 153507802, 153508171, 153509735, 153514066, 153545294, 153545903, 153547095, 153551122, 153557896, 153559232, 153585588, 153589589, 153591382, 153600631, 153600836, 153623349, 153647903, 153647925, 153648360, 153648615, 153666744, 153667253, 153667393, 153667834, 153702453, 153705045, 153742604, 153746485, 153747996, 153748727, 153750495, 153754652, 153755068, 153784049, 153818173, 153818862, 153821303, 153854732, 153866445, 153866527, 153894557, 153972413, 154017764, 154060120, 154060202, 154151143, 154176799, 154181806, 154260546.
Pikse (2024-09-27 11:39:21+00:00): Please avoid adding street names based on names of adjacent streets. This particular road has no name. It is not part of Tiigi tänav, see https://xgis.maaamet.ee/adsavalik/LP00014067.
Pikse (2024-09-27 11:46:00+00:00): Sorry, I now notice you didn't add this name initially. Another user added it and you only split the road into parts.
jaap de vries (2024-07-26 06:48:44+00:00): Let even op je bewerkingen, je vak is best groot. Een paar kleine vakjes is veel prettiger en is makkelijker om dit te controleren.
SaniTea (2024-07-26 06:52:44+00:00): ik was onderweg met de auto, dus vragen over de wegen waren makkelijk aan te vullen onderweg.
Dawid2849 (2024-08-13 15:08:45+00:00): Budynki staramy się dodawać na podstawie warstwy Geoportal 2: Ewidencja budynków WMS. W drodze wyjątku (jeśli nie ma tam obrysu budynku) można go narysować na podstawie orto. Poprawiłem więc geometrię
aTarom (2024-07-23 13:52:05+00:00): Hola, gracias por editar, para los "s/n" en addr:housenumber, disponemos del tag
"nohousenumber"="yes"
dispones de más información en
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:nohousenumber
y
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/nohousenumber-yes-en-espana/99343
lo modifico
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/230234807/history
Saludos
CurlingMan13 (2024-07-29 04:39:06+00:00): Changeset has been reverted in part or full.  Features that are "private" should still be mapped.  Access tags should be used to depict it is private.  You can read why deletion isn't the answer here:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154544704
Eslam_Elsayed (2024-07-25 08:22:12+00:00): Hello, andreidulgheru;
Thank you for your efforts in enhancing the base map in Qatar. I appreciate the collaboration and feedback.
I noticed that you've updated the access tags for the streets in the National Car Company: to "access=private"
But, according to the OSM Wiki definition:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access=permissive
A way is open for general public use, but access is not protected by law. The owner of the object or way may revoke access without following a legal process.
I also reviewed the provided ground imagery, such as from Kartaview and Mapillary, which show open gates in several tracks, indicating public access.
https://kartaview.org/details/9198857/0/track-info
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=443468537318665
Our team edited these streets as "access=permissive " after reviewing the imagery and found that "access=permissive" is more appropriate, reflecting the actual situation.
Changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154380957
Appreciate hearing from you your reasons for why you added "access=private" for the streets.
Best Regards
Eslam_Elsayed
andreidulgheru (2024-07-25 09:45:23+00:00): Hello Eslam_Elsayed,

Thank you for the message and for reviewing this way. Initially I added access=private, but after taking a closer look at the gates, I agree that access=permissive is more appropriate here. Thanks for making the update!

Best Regards,
andreidulgheru
Eslam_Elsayed (2024-07-25 11:50:52+00:00):  Hello, andreidulgheru;
Thank you for your quick response. I'm pleased that we are in agreement on this matter.
Best regards,
Eslam Elsayed
eggie (2024-07-23 12:04:33+00:00): Welkom bij OSM  'k Denk niet dat dit  goed is gegaan door de adresnodes te combineren. 
Adresnodes zijn directe import vanuit het Kadaster. 
MVG
eggie