piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Tymeker (2025-01-10 13:34:42+00:00): co miałem napisać, osobno granic lasów, gruntów ornych itp.? to by nie miało sensu
grzegorz75jan (2025-01-10 21:58:38+00:00): Miało by więcej niż parę innych które masz poprzednich edycjach a w tej właśnie by miało i nie były to tylko granice. Resztę o opisach masz w podanych linkach.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-10 16:28:32+00:00): Hello!

You used
access=private+
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12487036041/history

Have you maybe meant
access=private
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?
eggie (2025-01-09 20:27:48+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Sickla (2025-01-09 20:04:26+00:00): "Drottninggatan (a Pedetraian street)" should be "Drottninggatan (a Pedestrian street)"...
wies1 (2025-01-10 06:14:56+00:00): Hallo,
ich sehe, dass du hier viele Adressdaten ergänzt hast, was ich sehr gut und wichtig finde.

Eine Frage dazu:

Gibt es eine Möglichkeit alle Gebäude/Notes irgendwie zu erfassen, bei denen Adressdaten fehlen, so dass du sie dann sozusagen auf einen Schlag ergänzen kannst? Oder schaust du dir jedes einzeln an und ergänzt es?

Wie bist du darauf gekommen, dass an diesem Ort Adressangaben fehlen? Gibt es eine Seite, die dir das anzeigt.

Gruss
wies1
bwbuz (2025-01-10 12:48:47+00:00): Moin,
ich mache für die Orte jeweils eine overpass-Abfrage und gleiche dann ab bzw. ergänze oder korrigiere. In einigen Fällen ist auch die Nutzung des "Geofabrik OSM Inspector" hilfreich.
Netten Gruß
bwbuz
wies1 (2025-01-10 14:50:29+00:00): Hallo 
danke für die Rückmeldung.
Nach was suchst du da konkret? Nach PLZ? oder nach City?
Gruss
wies1
Taya_S (2025-01-10 18:57:45+00:00): Hello,

I've reverted this changeset because it broke the coastline and the Westerstrand in a complex way. Please try to not use multipolygons with only outers, it tends to lead to extra complexity and breaks more easily than regular ways.

Sincerely,
Taya

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161216895
pitscheplatsch (2025-01-10 11:51:41+00:00): Revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161147817

Thanks.
VictorIE (2025-04-19 05:34:38+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/130453472

I'm wondering why this road is marked access=no.

Such a tag is more appropriate to the likes of a firing range or sinkhole.

If something is out of bounds to the general public, it can be marked access=private.
citrula (2025-01-24 02:29:11+00:00): Welome to OSM! For trails which are closed to the public, please don't delete them - someone will most likely come back and readd them. Instead, you can use access tagging to clearly indicate that they are not open to the public. Wiki article for reference and further explanation: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F

Happy to chat further if you have any other questions!
BCNorwich (2025-01-12 19:06:34+00:00): Online shops are not allowed on OSM
Gamer789 (2025-01-13 09:19:14+00:00): Could you send me the rules please so I can see what is and is not permissible. Thanks.
BCNorwich (2025-01-13 09:44:14+00:00): Hi, Firstly anything added to OSM must be verifiable. OSM verifiability is explained here:- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Verifiability

An explanation by Frederik Ramm, a leading OSM moderator is given here:- https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/72910/how-should-i-map-an-online-shopping-store

In summation, anything added to OSM must be on the ground truth and physically verifiable at the site.

Regards Bernard.
Sickla (2025-01-09 19:57:12+00:00): 


https://www.stromma.com/en-se/stockholm/sightseeing/sightseeing-by-bus/hop-on-hop-off/

and

https://www.stromma.com/en-se/stockholm/sightseeing/sightseeing-by-bus/hop-on-hop-off/

and

https://sl.se/?mode=station-pages-tab&departuresSiteId=1004&name=Tegelbacken%20(Stockholm)
Dave Venables (2025-01-12 10:23:16+00:00): These "opening_hours" don't seem appropriate. The Strand is closed to vehicles in the early hours of Saturday and Sunday mornings to enhance pedestrian safety. Perhaps motor_vehicle:conditional = no @ Sa-Su 00:00-04:00 
Wardwick remains open to traffic I think including for Taxis picking up on Victoria Street and cars parked in the Saint James's Street Car Park I presume,
Dave Venables (2025-01-12 10:27:51+00:00): Or possibly motor_vehicle = no @ Sa-Su 00:00-04:00 for The Strand
Mintusha98 (2025-01-15 10:03:05+00:00): Apologies for the mistake I committed. Thank you for the valuable feedback. I look forward to your suggestion/feedback in the future as well. Thank you.
dieterdreist (2025-09-26 09:39:22+00:00): Hi, I just saw you added a foot route: "Pellegrinaggio delle Sette Chiese", can you tell me your sources? Is it signposted?
GBAB (2025-10-01 10:00:20+00:00): Actually not, it is not signposted, there is just a website to it that you can see on the relation itself:
https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=18528487&type=relation&map=14.0/41.8793/12.4856
elsy1 (2025-01-10 10:57:57+00:00): do want to answer my comments?
elsy1 (2025-01-10 10:58:07+00:00): reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161200476
NorthCrab_upload (2025-01-09 20:22:16+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Marszałka Piłsudskiego":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12487156719
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12487156720
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12487156721
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12487156728
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12487156738
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12487156739
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12487156790
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12487156791
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12487156792
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12487156799
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12487156800

"Okrzei":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12487156722
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12487156795
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1349851828

"Ignacego Paderewskiego":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12487156740
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12487156741

"Sobieskiego":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12487156746
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12487156788
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12487156817

"Sikorskiego":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12487156747
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12487156748
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12487156749
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12487156750
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12487156751
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12487156752
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12487156753
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12487156754
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12487156755
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12487156756
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12487156818
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12487156819
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12487156820
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12487156821
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12487156822
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12487156823
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12487156824
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12487156825
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12487156826
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12487156827

"Wysockiej":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12487156775
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12487156841
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12487156842
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12487156843

"Kłosowskiego":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12487156776
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/361972142

"Głowackiego":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12487156785

"Matysiaka":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12487156835

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eggie (2025-01-09 20:36:34+00:00): Dag Sneeuwmanneke.. De info heb ik verplaatst naar de adresnode.

MVG
eggie
archie (2025-01-09 20:45:09+00:00): Dessa vägar är tydligt skyltade som gång- och cykelvägar (gc-vägar). De var taggade som sådana helt korrekt av erfarna mappare. Vänligen låt bli att ändra på korrekt taggade vägar. Tack!
Swedish_Ag (2025-01-09 21:02:54+00:00): De var markerade som ”stig”, inte cykelväg. Dessutom pekade den ena ut på vägen som sträckan var förr innan den asfalterade streckannin mot Långeberga anlades. Jag bor i byn. Men du kanske kallar en stig för cykelväg? Erfarna mappare har inte gjort jobbet rätt. Jag behöver ha korrekta uppgifter för ett spel som jämtar data från OSM.
archie (2025-01-09 21:12:33+00:00): gc-vägar taggas så (kolla: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpath#Examples). Path har i osm en speciell betydelse (i synnerhet tillsammans med "designated"). Så "path" i osm kan inte direkt översättas med "stig" på svenska. Så taggningen var alldeles rätt innan du ändrade den. Jag reverterade detta.
Swedish_Ag (2025-01-09 21:17:37+00:00): Men det finns ju alternativet cykelväg, vilket det är. Pga detta skapas inte denna vägen i den generator som hämtar datan från OSM. Hur kan klassningen ”cykelväg” vara fel för en asfalterad belyst cykelväg? Tom ikonen för stig visar en gubbe med ryggsäck.
archie (2025-01-09 21:22:30+00:00): Vägen är skyltad som gc-väg och inte cykelväg. Jag ser även i övrigt att du har ändrat en del som genererar felmedelanden i validatorn. Arbetet med osm är inte till för att anpassas till andra aplikationer (som i ditt fall spel). Vänligen respektera detta.
Swedish_Ag (2025-01-09 21:31:09+00:00): Men ”erfarna mappare” kan inte ens markera upp tomtgränser och åkrar rätt. Åkrarna är helt raka linjer, kantiga, hackiga. Inte uppdelade såsom det är IRL. Jag försöker göra det rätt, men jag vet inte exakt hur man drar om befintliga områden. Om du är kung på detta så kan du ju göra det så det blir rätt och snyggt. 👍🏻

Arbetet med OSM är ju just till för andra att använda informationen. Det är ju just det som är poängen.
archie (2025-01-09 21:40:09+00:00): Du har vid flera ställen lagt landuse ovanpå landuse och ändrat relations-multipolygoner. Det förekommer flera fall av self-intersection. Det är nog bättre att du lär dig och tränar på något ställe som ännu inte är karterat. Det är en hel del fel där du har mappat. Någon måste städa upp där.
archie (2025-01-09 21:45:21+00:00): Om du, som du säger, inte vet hur du "drar om befintliga områden" (det är nog därför det har uppkommit fel) är det bäst att du ritar områden själv - efter bästa förmåga - och därmed lär dig. Det är inte lätt att komma in i mappningsarbetet, så man får ta små steg. Bäst att träna med egna inritade nya områden  istället för att göra skada på rätt mappade områden som tidigare mappare (alla kan ju knappast ha varit okunniga) har lagt in.
Swedish_Ag (2025-01-09 21:45:44+00:00): Ja någon måste göra det snyggt och rätt. Det har du helt rätt i. Mina första ändringar blev inte bra, men jag visste inte hur man raderade ändringarna man gjort, men det vet jag nu. Jag kan städa upp själv och fixa det. Har du möjligtvis discord så man kan konversera där? Det är väl meningen att erfarna ska hjälpa nybörjare?
Swedish_Ag (2025-01-09 21:52:01+00:00): Jag vet hur man gör nu. Jag kommer att fixa de felen som jag gjort, och dra fälten korrekt  enligt fastighetsgränsern.
archie (2025-01-09 21:53:10+00:00): Det låter bra. Nej, jag kör bara med öppen programvara, så discord har jag inte. Men du får gärna skicka personliga meddelanden till mig om du undrar något. 
En sak: kolla gärna i wiki för ledning vad gäller rätt taggning. Jag noterar t ex att du använde natural=wood i stället för landuse=forest. Det senare alternativet passar nog bättre här. Kolla i wikin varför detta är fallet!
Swedish_Ag (2025-01-09 22:00:28+00:00): Jag ska kolla, tackar för hjälpen. Jag fixar till kaoset imorgon och om jag stöter på patrull så skickar jag meddelande.
eggie (2025-01-09 20:31:41+00:00): Da Ed   De boom heb ik weer teruggeplaatst.
Schuiven met de kaart veroorzaakt dit soort onbedoelde verplaatsingen.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=161183197
MVG
eggie
Andrea Musuruane (2025-01-10 10:58:24+00:00): Ciao. Qual e' la fonte per questa modifica? Io vedo ancora questo distributore nell'anagrafica del Mise di oggi. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161183263
nick1993 (2025-01-10 16:00:30+00:00): Ciao andrea, ho controllato ieri sera, dava Ultima comunicazione rilevata: 27/11/2024, direi che dopo 1 mese che non comunicano nulla e il ref non e' piu' valido, vuol dire che c'e' un cambio gestione in corso, appena verra' aggiornato vedro' di cambiarlo
totera (2025-01-10 17:26:45+00:00): Sono fuori zona, ma dalle mie parti c'è un distributore chiuso ormai da quasi un anno che al Mise risulta ancora attivo con tanto di "aggiornamenti" dei prezzi... Non so come e perché sia possibile, ma ho imparato che non posso più basarmi soltanto sui dati Mise per mappare aperto o chiuso un impianto.
eggie (2025-01-09 21:13:17+00:00): Beste   Waar is nu adresnode Leonard Springerlaan 7 gebleven. Dat adres bestaat niet meer?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-01-09 21:14:37+00:00): Het BAG adres staat er gelukkig nog zie ik nu..
Massoeba (2025-01-09 21:19:44+00:00): De adresnode is verplaatst naar 35. Dat is het nieuwe adres.
eggie (2025-01-09 21:24:27+00:00): Duidelijk...
Maar zo verdwijnen ook vaak de oorspronkelijke adressen... vandaar dat we gespitst zijn op adreswijzigingen.
Mvg
eggie
eggie (2025-01-09 20:44:23+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback Ik zie geen paaltjes die je hebt toegevoegd, maar waarschijnlijk een afslagbeperking. 
Verder heb je de weg opgeknipt met een fietsroute. Die is nu stuk.
Ik kijk even of dat de oorzaak is.

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-01-09 20:46:26+00:00): De fietsroute was al stuk. Waarom een afslagbeperking hier. Staat hier bebording?
eggie (2025-01-09 20:51:59+00:00): He is de bedoeling dat je dan een paaltje plaatst en het niet oplost met afslagbeperkingen.
De fietsroute was toch geblokkeerd.
Ik draai de changeset even terug. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Tag:barrier%3Dbollard
eggie (2025-01-09 21:06:49+00:00): Ik heb hier een barrier=block toegevoegd. Het routeert dan wel voor tweewielers maar niet voor autoverkeer.
eggie (2025-01-09 21:07:07+00:00): https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=51.70705443006901&lng=5.5642515020969086&z=18.413974826873165&pKey=749583657022798&x=0.7801587707085167&y=0.5597899167559648&zoom=0.9101123595505618&focus=photo
Mikeeyhz (2025-01-10 12:14:46+00:00): Excuus, het klopt inderdaad. De situatie is zoals op mapillary te zien is. Niet goed genoeg ingelezen over het maken van de wijziging, zo blijkt :)
eggie (2025-01-10 12:25:06+00:00): Laat je niet ontmoedigen door wat kritiek.
OSM heeft wel een erg steile leercurve 😀
eggie (2025-01-09 21:12:15+00:00): Dag Massoeba

En is het dan hetzelfde adres gebleven?

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=161183763

MVG
eggie
Sickla (2025-01-09 20:51:05+00:00): https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copper_Building has JAG (Jämlighet Assistans Gemenskap) at Klara Södra Kyrkogata 1 (https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copper_Building ) ...
NorthCrab_upload (2025-01-09 21:01:04+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/372012592

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Jarek 🚲 (2025-01-11 00:36:01+00:00): Hi,
We've been adding the names to sidewalk so that pedestrian routing would give actually useful directions, including the street names to walk down rather than "walk on walkway". Is there a particular reason you don't think they should be there?
bphennessy (2025-01-11 06:17:23+00:00): Sorry, I was just following what I thought was standard practice. I didn't think sidewalks were supposed to have names. They aren't named anywhere else in the city so I assumed it was an error.
Jarek 🚲 (2025-01-11 18:10:31+00:00): Oh yeah, it hasn't been used in Toronto before. I saw it's done in Montreal and I think we should start it here too, so I started doing it and I saw PcMouse1 joined in. Having sidewalks as separate ways but with no names makes routing basically visual-only. Are you okay with me putting these names back, then? We should probably announce/document it somewhere to reduce confusion.
bphennessy (2025-01-11 20:45:38+00:00): Yes, absolutely, please do. And yeah, maybe adding a note to the Toronto wiki page or something would be good? 

Sorry for the confusion!
Jarek 🚲 (2025-01-15 01:18:45+00:00): Hey, so, as a follow-up, I posted about this on the forum https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/announcement-request-for-comments-naming-sidewalks-in-toronto/124205 and no one in Toronto seems much interested and international commentariat is against it, so I won't be doing it anymore
paulbrunner (2025-01-19 11:29:46+00:00): Hi Hammaneggs88,
thanks for all your contributions to OpenStreetMap!

I've been fixing "almost connected roads" on OpenStreetMap and came across this one: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1349859343

Two pointers here:
1. The road leading to the houses east is still not connected to Old Foothill Road. After clicking "Save" in the editor, you should get a warning about this on the left saying "Minor/Unclassified Road is very close but not connected to Old Foothill Road".
This is an older error on the map and it's great to fix these things when you come across them. Connecting the two roads means they can be used for routing, e.g. by firefighters who often use OpenStreetMap.

2. Generally we only map roads as separate if there is a physical separator, so the small part to make the turn south is not needed. You can pretty much connect Old Foothill Road and the road leading east (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/5187891) at a 90 degree angle.

Could you have a look at this and make the changes, i.e. deleting the small part going south and connecting the two roads? If there's any questions you have about OSM, let me know.

All the best and happy mapping,
Paul
ilias_ (2025-01-10 02:02:41+00:00): Hi! Welcome to OSM. Please keep your changesets local. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
Sickla (2025-01-09 21:20:00+00:00): "Mariegången" should be "Tysta Maiegången" ( https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tysta_Marigången )

Please also note the ongoing changes to the surrounding buildings and areas in Klarakvarteren ( https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Klarakvarteren ) ...
Glassman (2025-01-11 03:27:43+00:00): According to Lincoln County WA, GIS data, the RV park doesn't extend to Southeast Brace Street. See https://lincolnwa.maps.arcgis.com/apps/View/index.html?appid=bece73b1a4b04a01b776af8f832094a2. Can you review this edit and update as needed? Let me know if you need help
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161185031
wireguy (2025-01-10 16:38:00+00:00): BMacNeal, 
This change broke the white clay creek preserve relation.  Fixed in changeset below, please verify.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161212595
Sickla (2025-01-09 21:44:42+00:00): "20 km/h" there is "30 km/h" and note the road signs ("Road work","Other danger","30 km/h") and the separation of the lanes that starts before Herkulesgatan 17 with Sheraton on the Central brifge ( Centralbron ) that is a one way road to Herkulesgatan and Klaratunneln ( https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Klaratunneln ) that you can get to from the round about ( cirkulationsplatsen ) by Gullmarsplan for longer vehicles like buses and trucks that makes turns in the corners of Klarakvarteren ...
Fizzie-DWG (2025-01-27 02:13:04+00:00): DWG revert - Google Maps used as Source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161801467
eggie (2025-01-15 13:10:48+00:00): Hier zal het wel ergens verkeerd zijn gegaan met die rendering.
segubi (2026-03-22 16:41:10+00:00): Hallo, die Verwendung von direction_xxx:ref=yy für die Zielangabe eines Knotenpunktes ist ein Mißverständnis. ref ist laut wiki nur für Routen gedacht, und kann so zu Verwechslungen führen. 
(S. Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:direction_north ) bitte ggf. mitüberlegen, was besser ist (eindeutig und möglichst nicht zu umständlich) und dann korrigieren (https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/reprasentation-des-aktuellen-offiziellen-deutschen-radverkehrsnetzes-nach-den-vorgaben-der-fgsv-in-osm/4805/195 ) es gibt ohnehin schon zu viele Varianten...
SomeoneElse (2025-01-10 10:45:29+00:00): Hello,
Just so you know, I think that something in this changeset might have deleted something that was the boundary of a couple of townlands - https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4161139 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4161138 .  The previous situation of one of them can be seen at https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1WUV .
Would you like to fix this or would you like some help with that?
Best Regards,
Andy
Vpr65 (2025-01-10 12:03:32+00:00): Hi Andy

Thanks for calling my error out. I intended to delete a "non-existent" road way unfortunately I appear to also have deleted the boundary associated with this road way.

I would be very grateful if you could fix this.

Thanks again 

Vincent
SomeoneElse (2025-01-10 21:29:53+00:00): No problem.  I've filled in the gaps, and the two townlands seem valid as polygons again.
One thought though - the eastern bit of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1350089485 looks a bit like a dirt farm track (I presume a private one).  Would it be correct to add those tags?  
The western bit just looks like a connection across the field on the Bing and ESRI imagery - I'm guessing in the Midlands in January it might be a bit muddy right now :)
JesseFTW (2025-01-09 23:39:27+00:00): Thanks for adding these! In the future, to link notes and changesets, you can put the whole URL, that way it will be clickable. (It'd be nice if changeset #123 was clickable, but that hasn't been implemented yet.)
NEmappingperson (2025-01-09 23:44:01+00:00): Will do, thanks for telling me!
JesseFTW (2025-01-09 23:41:19+00:00): Oh I'm so glad you did this. I'd been seeing these out of date buildings on the map every time I'd go to Mahoney's, and kept forgetting to actually go and fix them. Much thanks for resolving my note and getting that done.
Glassman (2025-01-11 03:30:18+00:00): #TIP: OSM spells out street names - the reason is that software has a hard time unabbreviating. Can you expand the street name?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161186763
somehundred (2025-01-10 14:51:46+00:00): Manuprāt, jebkurš ceļš, kas iet kaut kam cauri, vai nu zemei vai mājai, vai kam citam, ir tunelis. Ja šis nav tunelis, tad kas tad tas ir?
HellMap (2025-01-10 15:45:54+00:00): Šis ir vienkārši celiņš ar  `covered=yes`, sānos uzbērumi. Virs viņa ir celiņš, kas ir tilts. Varēja arī nebūt tilts, varēja būt kaut kas cits.

Manuprāt, zemes uzbērums priekš tilta galīgi nepadara zemāk esošo celiņu par tuneli. Tam nav gandrīz nekādu tuneļa īpašību, galvenokārt, tas ir gandrīz vai īsāks neka plats. Manuprāt (no wiki) "if the lower way is short and the upper way is supported on concrete, brick on metal pillars and beams then that is almost certainly a bridge" šeit pilnībā atbilst.

Ceļš, kas iet cauri zemei ir tiešām tunelis, bet tad nevis uzbērums, bet zeme apkārt un tunelim vienlaida korpuss. Ceļš cauri mājai ir "mājas tunelis" vai caurbrauktuve - building passage.

Ja tu domā, ka te tiešām atbilstošāk ir tunelis, var jau likt. Es gan neuzskatu, ka tā būs pareizāki dati..
H_S (2025-10-02 17:07:25+00:00): Escuela Rur Nva Balsora, no se encuentra en este punto
pitscheplatsch (2025-01-10 11:47:07+00:00): Hi 475538.

Please have a look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Thanks!