piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
pitscheplatsch (2025-03-13 12:33:43+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/162964304
habib_amir (2025-03-02 11:08:52+00:00): Кхем, кто так криво теги расставляет? Зачем тротуару ставить тег service?
Tomas Straupis (2025-02-25 06:33:44+00:00): Šaligatviai, kurie yra kelio dalis, atskirais vektoriais pagal Lietuvos žymėjimo susitarimus neturi būti žymimi.
NeisBot (2025-02-25 17:01:03+00:00): Hello, thank you for your contribution.

I noticed that some of the tags and descriptions you've used appear to be related to #SEO #spam. I recommend reading the following page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Spam

Could you please confirm if your map edits here were intentional?

#MapWithoutSpam #TagSmartNotSpam
NeisRevert (2025-03-13 12:32:53+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/163568387
Taksine (2025-03-05 03:18:23+00:00): Most of the ones you added are not cities, please correct them.
NumisK (2025-04-24 11:06:15+00:00): Hello Nesim, thank You for your contribution in Turkey - Duplicated Highways challenge. Make sure that you edit scope of the task - remove duplicated highway before adjusting it to imagery layer. Happy Mapping!
NeisBot (2025-02-25 17:01:04+00:00): Hello, thank you for your contribution.

I noticed that some of the tags and descriptions you've used appear to be related to #SEO #spam. I recommend reading the following page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Spam

Could you please confirm if your map edits here were intentional?

#MapWithoutSpam #TagSmartNotSpam
NeisRevert (2025-03-13 12:32:15+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/163568359
Udarian (2025-02-25 08:16:03+00:00): since there isn't any good up to date imagery in the area I was wondering if you could provide screen shots of the "Lyft-owned aerial imagery " so that those of without access can check. I ask as a contributor, who from what I can tell goes to UM seemed pretty sure that it was only pedestrian in the area, from what I could tell; I am just trying to clarify things on my end here, since this commit leaves me unsure on what exactly is what since we are unlikely to get new OSM compliant aerial imagery sources in this area until at least July, likely August.
If you cant I understand.
sarya_Lyft (2025-02-25 12:09:36+00:00): Hi, Udarian

My name is Surander and I’m a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. 

Thank you very much for pointing this out. Here is Lyft-owned satellite imagery: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1z-7IaYaF73h_t7nyknZR5Dgk57R7s34z/view?usp=drive_link.
I adjusted the road type based on Lyft-owned telemetry data: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1S02hY2KiAm8Ib5dmIr_sq9ha2frBl6eE/view?usp=drive_link. However, I overlooked the fact that, the roads have different surfaces, and we lack clear evidence that the road is non-pedestrian. I have corrected my mistake in this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162927538. I sincerely apologize for the oversight. Thank you very much for your insight and your contribution to OSM.

Best regards, Surander
Udarian (2025-02-25 13:08:14+00:00): thank you so much for the clarification, looking at the imagery it does seem a bit unclear as to weather or not there is a road connection between the two ends of Dickson Drive divided by the pedestrian features and I think its safest to leave it as pedestrian until better aerial or street side imagery makes that clear.

while I have y'all's attention, I hope it wouldn't be to much of a bother if y'all can check weather or not the roundabout at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/384024486 is complete and if so fix the geometry as there is nothing there on the latest imagery and I am basically certain that they are placing a roundabout at that location. if its to much of a hassle please ignore, y'all just have significantly better imagery then I have so can check the state of that construction.
sarya_Lyft (2025-02-27 10:56:21+00:00): We have a satellite image of this location from November 2024: (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1SZekQuoxwcpZfzIR-uApWFv-wuiGQOcE/view?usp=drive_link), along with telemetry data from the past week (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1nnkKo9HxdCQF-vQPBM-q7_nZU4u6SDnb/view?usp=drive_link). Indeed, it looks like the roundabout has been completed. We have corrected the geometry in this changeset: (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162934788#map=15/25.59536/-80.32081&layers=N). I hope this aligns with your information regarding the reconstruction.
Udarian (2025-02-27 21:40:49+00:00): Thank you so much for the help with the roundabout.
Frans S (2025-02-25 10:11:29+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
Very accurate !
Just a rmark. Where a road crosses a hedge, please leave a gap in the hedge.
When you don't, it shows an error (in real life dont go through hedges either)
Best regards and keep mapping
arnalielsewhere (2025-02-25 11:04:58+00:00): Thank you for the reminder, Frans!
nevw (2025-02-25 05:44:04+00:00): Hi, some of the roads have a source name tag. If you change the name you need to delete the old source tag or add the source you are using to that tag. You can add the new source to your changeset comment too or instead.
What is your source for the name changes?
nevw (2025-02-25 05:45:12+00:00): Sorry, I see the source tag now.
afgb1977 (2026-01-25 15:14:49+00:00): Hello
Could you indicate the source from which you obtained the station name?
codll (2025-02-25 15:25:26+00:00): bah non
Tinetto (2025-04-24 11:11:15+00:00): Hello Tonny Mwendwa Kioko
Thank you for contribution! Make sure to use correct imagery source mentioned in project's description to avoid creation of superfluous objects, like way 1362784724. Happy Mapping!
Glassman (2025-02-26 17:29:19+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162918247
Tierumpu (2025-02-25 08:43:44+00:00): Hyvä
Glassman (2025-02-26 17:29:28+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162918326
Glassman (2025-02-26 17:29:35+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162918365
s777n (2025-02-25 21:36:58+00:00): Здравствуйте. Имя предназначено только для собственных имен. Например "Александровский дворец" или "Магнит". А вот местные названия, номера домов или типы объектов например "Продуктовый" или "Реактор" добавлять не нужно. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Названия

Сам реактор уже отмечен точкой.
Glassman (2025-02-26 17:31:40+00:00): I could not find any records of the road in the counties data. Doesn't show on bing imagery or lidar map so I removed it. If there is a road there it may just be a track. unclassified is like a residential road in rural areas.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162918558
Davis Peak (2025-02-26 18:41:01+00:00): Thank you for reviewing my edits. This particular gravel road is invisible from aerial photos because of the dense tree cover. The road is sourced from the DNR FPAMT: https://fpamt.dnr.wa.gov/2d-view#activity?-13650418,-13649272,5780717,5781258?WADNR_PUBLIC_Public_Land_Survey!8!4!0!,WADNR_PUBLIC_FP_Water_Type!1!,WADNR_PUBLIC_FP_Trans!0!1!2!,WADNR_PUBLIC_FP_Hydro!3!1!,WADNR_PUBLIC_FP_Misc!1!4!0!,WADNR_PUBLIC_OCIO_Parcels!0!

(I also have been on the road myself)

I am hoping to get this updated because it is the entry road into the only private parcel in the whole area.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162918558
Glassman (2025-02-26 20:47:06+00:00): I restored the road but made it a track. I also noticed from the website you referenced, Davis Peak Road is named PH-1000. Though I know many of these roads have duplicate names. Can you confirm that it is called Davis Peak Road?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162918558
Davis Peak (2025-02-26 23:15:34+00:00): Indeed, it has a DNR name, and a county name. I think the county name is more appropriate in this case. My source for the name comes from this new address notification document: 

https://www.cowlitzinfo.net/WLBldgAddress/DocView.aspx?id=31550485&dbid=0&repo=CCIMAGES&searchid=de4a8fec-a69e-4fd3-b53f-767785dd55af

This demonstrates it is called Davis Peak road, at least up to the fork at Ph-1006A.
Davis Peak (2025-02-26 23:20:29+00:00): For whatever reason, going further east along Davis Peak road, it gets renamed Aho Carson. That is very likely not accurate, but I have no source. Logically, it seems like it should be called Davis Peak Road until it reaches Davis Peak!
Glassman (2025-02-27 03:11:46+00:00): I'd probably go ahead and rename it Davis Peak Road unless it's signed. Many of the roads in the Cascade mountains are from very old data, and likely wrong.
❤️‍🔥 (2025-02-25 08:53:17+00:00): thanks for your edits, are you mapping the curve speeds or just the line speed? I've added an inconsistent mix of both in auckland, still not sure what the best approach is
ar1001 (2025-02-26 04:47:15+00:00): I believe I'm putting in curve speeds? Essentially, I'm using the white speed signage along the route, not the yellow signage. I've struggled to find online documentation however on NZ trackside signage to clarify.
s777n (2025-02-25 21:34:40+00:00): Здравствуйте. Вы поменяли power=compensator на power=реактор . Вернул обратно. Как отмечаются компенсторы: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:power%3Dcompensator#Возможные_значения_по_типу

Вы разделили здание распределительного устройства на два здание. Но второму зданию не добавили никаких тегов и удалили оттуда трансформатор. Это просто пустое здание? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1362790837 

Еще вы добавили второй трансформатор в здание - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/821218306 Там реально два трансформатора?
Sozertsatel (2025-02-26 13:42:44+00:00): Здравствуйте, там по факту два отдельно стоящих модуля, в одном ЛЭП АБ с одним трансформатором, второе складское помещение;
8306- это модуль ТСН, там два трансформатора 10/0,4 400 кВа
NeisBot (2025-02-25 17:01:12+00:00): Hello, thank you for your contribution.

I noticed that some of the tags and descriptions you've used appear to be related to #SEO #spam. I recommend reading the following page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Spam

Could you please confirm if your map edits here were intentional?

#MapWithoutSpam #TagSmartNotSpam
NeisRevert (2025-03-13 12:30:50+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/163568297
PrasantPant (2025-03-16 05:55:21+00:00): what went wrong with my contribution? I did what to be done with non-spam intention.
if that violates the policy , I am really sorry. It happened unintentionally.How may i correct them?
osmfan (2025-02-25 13:12:43+00:00): Offizieller und gebräuchlicher Name ist Galeria, ggf. GALERIA. Der "Besitzer" weiß, wie sein Kaufhaus heißt: https://www.galeria.de/filialen/l/munster/salzstrasse-47-50/001174

Kleine Gedächtnisstütze, sämtliche Medien berichteten von einer Namensvereinheitlichung von Karstadt und Galeria Kaufhof zu Galeria für alle Filialen. Warum schlägt der NSI wohl sofort eine Namensänderung in iD zu Galeria vor?

https://www.mopo.de/hamburg/nach-karstadt-pleite-das-passiert-mit-dem-kaufhaus-in-der-city/

Außenbeschilderung NOCH Karstadt, innen wird Karstadt nicht mehr verwendet. Also auch rein OTG - was NICHT der gebräuchliche Name sein muss - ist die Situation keineswegs eindeutig. Welcher Name steht in der Online, Print- und Payback-Werbung? Ganz sicher nicht Karstadt, wie kann es dann der gebräuchliche Name sein.
Durch deine Änderung verhinderst Du auch, dass man diese Filiale im Navi oder OSM finden kannst unter dem offiziellen Namen Galeria.
Davon abgesehen wurde vergessen, old_name=Karstadt zu löschen, alt_name zu setzen und im Hinweis -dort sind zwei Mapper einig- zu kommentieren https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4638187 .
So geht es nicht. 
Name wieder geändert.
Brummelwuff (2025-02-25 19:04:20+00:00): " Der "Besitzer" weiß, wie sein Kaufhaus heißt" 
Er schreibt es aber nicht an sein Kaufhaus... OTG ist es Karstadt brand=Galaria
osmfan (2025-02-26 07:39:28+00:00): "Er schreibt es aber nicht an sein Kaufhaus", aber sonst an jeder denkbaren Stelle, sogar - wie es sich für die Etablierung einer erfolgreichen Marke gehört - immer gleich in Kapitälchen GALERIA.
Was wird wohl auf einem Kassenbon der Filiale stehen (das ist auch OTG) oder auf der Einkaufstüte? Nach welchem Namen wird jemand im Garmin-Navi mit OSM-Karte suchen (das von alt_name oder official_name nichts weiß), der sich bei galeria.de vorher informiert hat, kurz zuvor in Galeria Heegbarg, Hamburg(*) eingekauft hat, in "Galeria Kaufhof" nebenan eingekauft hat, in der Zeitung gelesen hat, dass der Insolvenzverwalter die Namensänderung für alle Filialen angeordnet hat, um die Kundenassoziation "ich betrete die Pleitefirma" zu beenden? Unter welchem Namen wird doch gleich die überwältigende Filialmehrheit in OSM aufgelistet? Natürlich ist das Schild wichtigster Kandidat für das namens-Tag, im wiki steht allerdings, es soll der gebräuchlichste Name eingetragen werden. Wenn ich Karstadt in der Karte lese, denke ich sofort, die Filiale ist tot und niemand hat es eingetragen. Wer den gebräuchlichsten Namen sicher kennt, soll den bitte eintragen. Ich tippe darauf, dass die meisten lokal befragten Personen beide Namen hintereinander nennen werden.
Bist Du ortsansässig und kannst Du das Namensschild täglich kontrollieren? Es wird sich ändern, das ist eine reine Kosten- und Genehmigungsdauerfage.
(*) Dort ist natürlich OTG Galeria Kaufhof auf dem Schild zu lesen - ach ne steht ausschließlich Galeria dran und zwar nicht seit gestern.
Taya_S (2025-02-25 07:44:32+00:00): Hello AKANKUNDA SHIVAN,

These buildings you've been adding in this area don't really look like buildings on aerials, nor do the triangles and misshapen rectangles you've been adding seem very common for building shapes. 

How did you determine these are buildings and that they are shaped like that?

Sincerely,
Taya Snijder
NeisBot (2025-02-25 17:01:13+00:00): Hello, thank you for your contribution.

I noticed that some of the tags and descriptions you've used appear to be related to #SEO #spam. I recommend reading the following page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Spam

Could you please confirm if your map edits here were intentional?

#MapWithoutSpam #TagSmartNotSpam
pitscheplatsch (2025-03-13 12:29:41+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/163010273
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-26 06:02:01+00:00): Revert of https://osm.org/changeset/162878511
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-26 06:02:26+00:00): Thanks for reverting the changeset. It would be really helpful if next time you could leave a comment on the reverted CS. That way, we can all stay in the loop about the changes you're making.
NeisBot (2025-02-25 17:02:26+00:00): Hi Jaikrishnan_james, and thank you for your contributions to the OSM project!

I've noticed that over the past few hours, you've made several changesets with comments that might be unclear, difficult to understand, or consistently repetitive.

For collaboration within the OSM community, it’s helpful to provide comments that explain the changes you’ve made. This helps others follow your work more easily. You can find some useful tips for writing clear and effective changeset comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Thanks for your attention to this.

PS: I’ve also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#ClearComments
habi (2025-03-18 21:19:00+00:00): Ciao 
https://www.bellevue-parkhotel.ch/de/gourmet-restaurant-adelboden/ scheint noch zu bestehen, was hast du denn für ein Hinweis, dass das Restaurant nicht mehr besteht?
Gruss aus Bern,
habi
NorthCrab_upload (2025-02-25 08:00:46+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11591874955
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/424070104

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
geomaniX (2025-12-01 20:04:13+00:00): Moin!
Du hast hier diesen Guidepost https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8454473918 von der S-Bahn Haltestelle aufs Feld geschoben.
Wahrscheinlich ein Versehen

VG 
geomaniX
NeisBot (2025-02-25 17:01:18+00:00): Hello, thank you for your contribution.

I noticed that some of the tags and descriptions you've used appear to be related to #SEO #spam. I recommend reading the following page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Spam

Could you please confirm if your map edits here were intentional?

#MapWithoutSpam #TagSmartNotSpam
pitscheplatsch (2025-03-13 12:29:01+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/12617698845
eggie (2025-02-25 08:33:46+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback   Gebouwen met adressen zijn een van de weinige zaken die niet ingetekend worden. Die worden periodiek geïmporteerd. 
Je kunt dart versnellen middels een verzoek op het forum in het draadje BAG importverzoeken. 
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/nl/43
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
NorthCrab_upload (2025-02-25 08:30:55+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie powinna zawierać przedrostka. Nazwa ulicy nie powinna zaczynać się od 'ul.', 'ulica' itp. Należy usunąć przedrostek i pozostawić samą nazwę ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12484349107

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

Zasady nazewnictwa ulic w polsce:
https://wiki.osm.org/Pl:Znakowanie_dróg_w_Polsce#Nazewnictwo_ulic

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-17 00:49:41+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165050253
soliMM (2025-02-26 18:12:33+00:00): Hi dada24,

Why did you change building:parts to building=yes once again? I will revert this back to building:parts in the upcoming days, it would be nice of you to shed some light on your edits. Also, take some time and read this https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_3D_Buildings in more detail so we can evade issues caused by your edits.
NeisBot (2025-02-25 17:01:19+00:00): Hello, thank you for your contribution.

I noticed that some of the tags and descriptions you've used appear to be related to #SEO #spam. I recommend reading the following page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Spam

Could you please confirm if your map edits here were intentional?

#MapWithoutSpam #TagSmartNotSpam
pitscheplatsch (2025-03-13 12:28:11+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/163009634
Fizzie-DWG (2025-06-04 01:21:01+00:00): DWG revert - poor quality mapping from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167156814
Nathan_A_RF (2025-02-26 18:38:26+00:00): Hey, please remember to add maxspeed:type tags when changing/adding maxspeed tags. Thanks!
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-30 10:15:58+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12617812581/history has fixme:type = Shop that was added in this edit
What kind of shop is here?

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop for common values - is any of them fitting?
trigpoint (2025-03-02 11:35:58+00:00): Qu'est-ce que le projet cd14?
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-17 00:42:48+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165050151
NeisBot (2025-02-25 09:38:48+00:00): Hello irepair zone, welcome to OSM, and thank you for your contributions!

I've taken a look at your recent edits and wanted to discuss a few discrepancies I noticed regarding the surrounding environmental features. Specifically, the locations in your edits don't seem to align with the typical geographical characteristics expected in that area. Here are some (max 10) relevant links to the edits:
https://osm.org/node/12617824623

Could you please take a look?
Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#Somewhere
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=162923681
NeisRevert (2025-03-03 14:35:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/163164025 where the changeset comment is: 
Remove misplaced data
Strubbl (2025-02-25 22:31:11+00:00): Hallo Holle85, vielen Dank für deine neuen POIs. Gibt es einen besonderen Grund, warum du sie außerhalb vom Gebäude platzierst? Ich könnte mir vorstellen, dass der Arzt seine Praxis im Gebäude hat.
Viele Grüße
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-08 00:09:02+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164656299
pjvds (2025-02-27 16:30:32+00:00): Deze changeset raakt wel heel veel van Nederland.
dvdhoven (2025-02-27 16:58:25+00:00): Simpel, ik leg rcn routes in, die wordt lid gemaakt van het netwerk Utrecht, dat ongeveer zo groot is als de provincie Utrecht.
Zie daar de grenzen van mijn changeset.
dvdhoven (2025-02-27 17:12:14+00:00): En verder ben ik des duivels
Het moet niet gekker worden, een beginneling gaat een ervaren mapper met 10 jaar ervaring de les lezen over de grootte van de changeset.
Het moet niet idioter worden.
Verdiep je eerst maar eens in OSM en vooral in routerelaties voor je met dit soort commentaren komt.
Ik zit daar niet op te wachten
mvexel (2025-03-06 16:09:21+00:00): Hello tcarlisle, 
From an experienced mapper like yourself, I would expect to see a more thoughtful and welcoming approach to judging a new mapper's first changes made to OSM. While I am sure there are mistakes made, it is obvious that this person has made a serious effort to add useful information to the map, and it seems clear that they spent quite a bit of time on this particular changeset. By dismissing all these changes without any comment or guidance, you have accomplished two things:
1. This mapper is unlikely to continue to contribute to OSM, and we are losing their unique knowledge and perspective  they might otherwise contribute to what is our collaborative map.
2. The potentially useful parts of this new mappers efforts are now lost to all of us.
As the organizer of the OSM Utah meetups, I care about welcoming new mappers to our community, and it is actions like these that make my work all that much harder. I would love it if you would consider what impact your actions have on people taking their first steps contributing to OSM. Perhaps you can reach out to this mapper and explain what you think they did wrong and how they may contribute their knowledge instead? I have no particular knowledge of backcountry skiing nor the tagging involved, but I am sure there is a way to capture this data on our map. 
Also, please consider joining our meetups sometime, we are at osmutah.org and meet on the first Tuesday of the month in Salt Lake City. We would love to welcome you there.
tcarlisle (2025-03-06 16:25:49+00:00): Hey, your call out is deserved.  Just so you are aware I've been working on composing a thoughtful response to this mapper.  Life has gotten in the way and I'm just behind on finishing it up.  My intention is not to discourage new mappers.  I'll get a response out as soon as I can.  I wasn't even aware of the meetings untill about a week ago but I'd like to participate at some point.
mvexel (2025-03-07 15:33:24+00:00): Thanks tcarlisle. I've seen your edits around and they've been great so I was a little surprised.

I am curious how you found out about our meetups - I hope you can make it sometime! That would be great!