piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Leo Slager (2026-05-30 11:06:40+00:00): Dag McVL02,

Je hebt hier wel de landuse=grass verwijderd. Ik vraag me af waarom.
De combinatie van tags als het gebruik als campingplaats en de landuse is normaal mogelijk.
Dat zijn 2 verschillende zaken die op het zelfd3 vlak getagd kunnen worden.

Zet je de landuse zelf weer terug ?
McVL02 (2026-06-01 13:15:49+00:00): Ha Leo,
bedankt voor de feedback. In https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183498538 heb ik de landuse tags van de 8 terreinen teruggezet.
Leo Slager (2026-06-01 19:34:02+00:00): Top
Udarian (2026-05-29 21:14:12+00:00): the url for the image linked to the building way and the node are broken, "osition=0&yposition=380&rw=768&rh=430.jpg" is not a valid url, please update it to point to the correct url.

happy mapping,
Udar.
Lejun (2026-07-30 09:21:23+00:00): Le nom est surprenant (d’autant plus que Marnay est de l’autre côté de l’Ognon), c’est officiel ?
kingkingHK (2026-05-30 04:40:58+00:00): Please don't lie to validators. What even is the purpose of clicking random buttons until the validator shuts up? This is vandalism. People have told you this before: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168117468

This changeset creates more issues than it solves. I have no option but to revert it: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183382104

This is already your second warning. If you continue to vandalise the map to please a validating software, the DWG will be contacted. 你好自為之!!!
JeroenHoek (2026-05-29 19:22:27+00:00): De huisartsenpost kan beter op de al bestaande adresnode. Plaatsnamen schrijf je niet in HOOFDLETTERS trouwens.
Leo Slager (2026-05-30 11:07:32+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Leo Slager (2026-05-30 11:09:16+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Azimekh (2026-05-29 15:14:52+00:00): Typo in the change notes, year should be 2026
jhaluska80 (2026-06-07 01:19:02+00:00): You added it correctly.  The only thing you needed to do is hit Q after drawing it to "square" it which just makes it look nicer.  I took the liberty of updating it for you.

Now you have to power to add most missing buildings and addresses.
BCNorwich (2026-05-29 17:03:01+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

No public access doesn't mean no access at all (access=no). If the feature is a highway then there must be some sort of access. This area looks like it's agricultural, so I assume these tracks are used for agriculture, thus the tag is access=agriculture. Using this tag means no other access is allowed.

I've amended the access=no tags.

Regards Bernard.
tootsotter (2026-05-29 17:50:55+00:00): Many thanks for correcting me, I will now look at all the ones I have done.
I was astounded to find that all my private tracks had suddenly become accessable to all.
All the best
George
matteobott (2026-05-29 15:24:15+00:00): note/2456443
Zwyklak (2026-06-11 21:09:09+00:00): tyle, że CCC wchłonął lokal Homli do siebie
Zwyklak (2026-06-11 21:09:52+00:00): https://www.galeriacopernicus.pl/kontakt#centerMap
Lachgast (2026-05-30 12:01:32+00:00): Hoi Tyrannis!
Ik zag je bewerking toevallig voorbij komen. Ja, met een bedrijf aan huis altijd lastig. Kun je er ook langs komen met kleding?
Je zou ipv een winkel ook craft=clothes_mending kunnen kiezen. Die wordt niet veel gebruikt, maar 'craft' is wel de sleutel voor dit soort handwerkers.

Kun je daar iets mee?

groet!
Lachgast
Lachgast (2026-05-30 12:11:39+00:00): Hoi Tyrannis,

Mij nog een keer, ik zie nu net je net begonnen bent op OSM! Welkom bij ons project. Wat leuk dat je dingen wil bewerken op de kaart. Een naaiatelier is inderdaad iets wat we kunnen gebruiken.

Even een paar tips:
- Je hebt het winkeltje op een nieuw adrespunt gezet. Dat hoeft niet, er staat middenin het pand een adrespunt (nr. 5). Daar kun je alle informatie aan toevoegen. In Nederland staat alle informatie op een los adrespunt die in het gebouw 'staat'. 
- Je hebt nu shop=naaiatelier als informatie toegevoegd. Omdat openstreetmap een wereldwijd project is (en begonnen is in Engeland) zijn alle waarden in het engels. "Shop" is de sleutel, en "naaiatelier" is de waarde". 
Ik zat net even te bladeren in de wiki van openstreetmap (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop) en ik zag daar shop=tailor (kleermaker), dat is ook voor kledingreparatie. 

Dus, als je de informatie toevoegt aan de nr. 5 in het gebouw en het nieuwe adrespunt weghaalt en van naaiatelier tailor maakt (dat kan handmatig in de bewerker van openstreetmap) dan ziet het er keurig uit en verschijnt ook iets op de kaart! (denk ik)

Succes en veel plezier hier!
Lachgast
JeroenHoek (2026-05-29 19:17:20+00:00): De naam staat al op het ziekenhuis-vlak. Die hoort dan niet nog een tweede keer op het gebouw.
Marcel Valk (2026-05-29 19:21:07+00:00): Oké ik dacht dat het er niet goed in stond. Het vakje van het in te voeren naam was leeg.
JeroenHoek (2026-05-29 19:23:52+00:00): Klopt. Je keek naar het gebouw. Het ziekenhuis zelf is deze:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/990976406
Marcel Valk (2026-05-29 19:57:42+00:00): Ja dat denk ik ook.
Sébastien Pi (2026-05-30 14:55:19+00:00): Salut,
T’as vraiment pas perdu de temps ! Je suis passé ce matin faire des photos aussi.
Tu as oublié un oneway:bicycle=no par contre.

Je suppose qu’il y aura une bordure à terme.
BardafFr (2026-05-30 16:01:28+00:00): Oui, je ne savais pas trop comment marqué la bidir vu que ce n'est que du marquage actuellement. Oui je pense que la bordure de séparation arrivera après les travaux du nouveau quartier pour laisser les camion manœuvrer.

Je suis passer voir hier soir, j'avais eu plusieurs alerte de la modification :)
benori (2026-06-04 14:16:25+00:00): Why did you changed my edit?
felipeeugenio (2026-05-30 13:32:31+00:00): Hola. Gracias por las ediciones. Muy útiles.

eso si voy a hacer un par de correcciones, porque es evidente que usó una foto desactualizada y marcó algunos caminos con categorías que no tienen.
Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183362628
Nakaner-repair (2026-06-09 09:51:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183866122, 183866141, 183866143, 183866127 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by ticki_52 since CS 183039302, see https://c.osm.org/t/144453 for details
Leo Slager (2026-05-30 11:11:49+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Yunan973 (2026-05-30 22:27:25+00:00): the relation is a building and the 2 members are 2 building : are you sure there are 3 buildings here ?
Maybe it is better only one building with 2 rooms, no ?
Regards
nono303 (2026-06-02 06:58:58+00:00): Hi @Yunan973.Lot of "multi building" shelter are defined like this but you're right.
I switched properties key for each node from building to building:part and keep build for relation
Yunan973 (2026-06-03 17:24:48+00:00): building:part should be a part of a building area (=a closed way) not of a multipolygon relation, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building:part=yes
I moved the tags from the relation to a new way building, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1525862478.
Regards
Dimitar155 (2026-05-29 19:53:48+00:00): Здравей, спирката е преименувана от около месец. Виж https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182046246.
venelin98 (2026-05-29 20:20:16+00:00): Здравей,
Странно, защото и в екрана на автобуса и на спирката пишеше старото име (Игнатиев)
Dimitar155 (2026-05-29 21:05:11+00:00): Решението е влязло в сила и спирката официално се води преименувана. Вече защо толкова време не могат да обновят 200 табла на спирки и няколко бази данни е непонятно за мен...
kytta (2026-06-03 12:56:35+00:00): Moin, und danke für den Edit!

Ich habe da eine kurze Frage: wo hast Du die Adressdaten, insb. die Hausnummer her? Wenn ich die Straße im ALKIS (Katasterkarte) nachschaue, hat der Hausblock die Nummern 13–16. 13a und 16a sind nicht vorhanden, und Häuser 11 und 12 sind woanders.

ALKIS kann ja auch fehlerhaft sein; warst Du persönlich in der Gegend und kannst Du bestätigen, dass dies die Hausnummern sind, die vor Ort so vorkommen?

Gruß
Nikita
Darnight14 (2026-05-29 16:43:35+00:00): *看见
tguen (2026-06-04 03:55:25+00:00): Hello,
I've reverted the abbreviation of these street names per OSM policy. See: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Abbreviations
旧加卷 (2026-05-30 04:30:43+00:00): I am confused by the phrase "OFFICIAL Wikipedia data". Do you mean Wikipedia or Wikidata? How is Wikipedia "official"? Is it sponsored by the officials?
Apparently, the "various sources" that you cited are AMTI status map of the South China Sea and Wikipedia, which are all secondary sources.
Considering the fact that the Chinese Wikipedia page of the Sabina Shoal has labeled the People's Republic of China as the side which de facto administrates the Sabina Shoal (https://zh.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%E4%BB%99%E5%AE%BE%E7%A4%81&oldid=76274254), would you still consider Wikipedia as a valid source?
The AMTI map of the South China Sea has also labeled Scarborough Shoal as "unoccupied", which differs from OpenStreetMap Data, Wikipedia, and what the Philippine government has acknowledged. Which of these sources do you consider reliable?
The previous mapper @特蕾西娅 has described the status of Sabina Shoal as "effectively controlled by the People's Republic of China". In what way can you interpret this as "asserting political agendas"?
You've removed the outer limit of the territorial sea from relation/17296619 , do you have any evidence that supports Sabina Shoal not being claimed by either side of China or Vietnam?
You should not be adding Wikipedia and Wikidata entries that contain the content regarding Sabina Shoal itself into the outer limit of the territorial sea. These entries have already been implemented into relation/20018838 .
michaelIsADullGuy (2026-05-31 02:38:05+00:00): The English, French, Japanese, and Vietnamese Wikipedia articles on Sabina Shoal are severely outdated, with most information cutoff dates preceding the end of 2024. According to the rules of actual control, the PLA and police have already exercised effective control over the location, making it a newly occupied territory. Side note: How did you come to refer to Wikipedia as 'Official data'? It is nothing more than a community website with biased perspectives.
eteb3 (2026-05-31 09:54:46+00:00): Hi spiregrain,

Thanks for the edit - it's going to let me add a lot more detail for this mosque.

One quick thing: annoyingly, building=mosque doesn't represent a place of worship, rather a building built as a mosque. This looks like a converted building to me.

Most mosques in the UK should be amenity=place_of_worship + religion=muslim (and this makes them render on openstreetmap.org)

building=mosque can be added *as well*, if the mosque was purpose-built rather than converted.

I'm on a mission to re-tag so will do this one, too - just thought I'd let you know!

Happy mapping
spiregrain (2026-05-31 10:02:24+00:00): Good point.   I think this one didn't have a POW tag either.  It seems to be a multi purpose muslim community centre, mosque, madrassa etc.   but it's a large pair of grant semi-detached houses originally.

So next time I have a mouse on my hand I'll ser the building to terrace and building:use to mosque along with the POW tags you suggest.
kingkingHK (2026-05-30 04:54:46+00:00): Feature already exists as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/694337074 . Please be careful.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183382532
Sammyhawkrad (2026-06-02 08:21:07+00:00): Does this school no longer exist?
NieWnen (2026-06-09 13:16:26+00:00): Cześć,

tagowanie CPR jest nieco inne, używa się highway=path
Zachęcam do zapoznania się z wiki jak tagować ciągi pieszo-rowerowe oraz poprawy wprowadzonych zmian.

 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Rowery#Drogi_dla_pieszych_i_rower%C3%B3w
HashFerret (2026-05-29 20:03:49+00:00): Based off this being in slc it's probably a motorola rather than a flock. Are you able to check the reference images on this page and confirm? https://deflock.org/identify. 

Thanks for adding. I think there's still a few unmapped hiding in the west side.
5m4u9 (2026-05-30 03:05:16+00:00): Hola, bienvenid@ y gracias por editar el mapa en Cochabamba.

El área que dibujaste será uno inmobiliario? industrial? 🤔 Ya está en construcción? De todas formas lo recategoricé a terreno porque el que pusiste es para viviendas con casas o edificios construidos y habitados.

 El nombre no podemos dejarlo así como pusiste, porque más parece una descripción que un nombre...
pwbriggs (2026-05-29 22:43:07+00:00): Thanks! Re: navigation searches (also known as geocoding), depending on what app you're using, you can expect it to be updated in a couple weeks or more with new data—a lot of apps (CoMaps, OSMAnd, etc.) only process and download new data updates from OpenStreetMap every once in a while
bdentremont (2026-05-30 16:33:54+00:00): Hi Nancy:
Welcome to OSM. Thank you for your contributions to this neighborhood.

Please take a look at the following regarding how not to use the name=* tag.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_map_for_the_renderer
If a street or building doesn't have a sign-posted name in real life, it probably shouldn't have one on OSM.  I realize some editors will throw a warning about residential streets left unnamed, but that is entirely appropriate to ignore if isn't marked with a name in real life.
Branko Kokanovic (2026-06-04 10:48:33+00:00): Ulica se od pre par meseci ne zove Donjokrajska, vec Markova. Mozete pogledati u sluzbenom glasniku ili na RGZ sajtu. Staro ime je prebaceno u old_name, tako da moze da se nadje i po tome.
BZilovic (2026-06-04 12:40:11+00:00): Tabla "Markova ulica" je pre nekoliko godina nezvanično postavljena kada je na ličnu inicijativu čovek asfaltirao deo puta koji se decenijama zvao "Stari manastirski put" i nazvao ulicu po sebi. Kada su ulice u selu dobile zvanične nazive, "Stari manastirski put" je (od Gornjomilanovačke do Glavne dračke) postao Donjokrajska. Postavljene su zvanične table i stanovnici su izmenili i lična dokumenta. Ne znam zašto postoji nesuglasica sa Službenim glasnikom i RGZ, na koju ukazujete. Na početku ulice stoji zvanična tabla Donjokrajska, u ličnim dokumentima se vodi Donjokrajska, u poreskom rešenju piše da je ulica Donjokrajska.
pwbriggs (2026-05-29 19:52:49+00:00): Is Westminster Presbyterian Church the building south of the gymnasium?
pwbriggs (2026-05-29 22:40:01+00:00): It looks like it is based on their website, so I moved WPC to that building instead of at the Our Lady gym.

I added more details to the campus as well—your edits were mostly good, my edits just built on top of them.

I don't believe a site relation is necessary for the buildings, but I'm not an expert on that type of relation so if you have a strong reason for why a site relation would be good then I'd be happy to discuss.

Finally—thanks for your contributions, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Feel free to reach out on the https://osm.org website or on Slack at https://slack.openstreetmap.us/ if you have any questions.
TrickyFoxy (2026-07-27 14:16:11+00:00): К сожалению Яндекс.Карты для правок использовать нельзя
gorloff (2026-07-27 14:23:27+00:00): давате заменим на то, что это личные заметки?
Fizzie-DWG (2026-06-20 05:33:06+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184339865
Nadja15 (2026-05-30 13:37:30+00:00): I don't think the common word "communication" is much of an etymology. These kinds of link are more useful when places are named after certain individuals or such, not when they just happen to contain a common word in their name.
PizzaTreeIsland (2026-05-30 13:41:22+00:00): But it's still named after the concept of communication, right? And isn't that what etymology means in this context? Just how a garden street might be named after gardens.
Nadja15 (2026-05-30 17:45:31+00:00): Yeah, but, communication is just a common word, not some named entity.

I don't know. I tried to make an analogy to myself, what if a road was called Raspberry Road, would it make sense to link to the word Raspberry in that case. I guess. I can see that someone might wonder, "oh, what berry was raspberry again, I wanna know what berry the road my friend lives on is named after", and clicking the etymology link would bring them to that page. It would serve the purpose perfectly.

But "communication" just feels, not quite it. It is just a common word, not some entity. But I guess I don't have any strong argument, other than that it feels off, in the sense that if I saw something tagged like that I would probably go "seriously..." and remove it.

The wiki also says "Avoid using if the meaning of the name is self-evident or generic (Station Road, Main Street, High Road, Meadow Lane etc.)."

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name:etymology

But I'll leave it to you. I don't have any strong argument after all.
PizzaTreeIsland (2026-05-30 18:01:24+00:00): My main argument for having it there is that the main purpose for having that tag in general is not for people to look up what a word means or who a certain person was if they don't know, which I guess is where usually etymology comes from. I think it is rather about having the data set for whatever social analysis people want to do. There are residential areas where every street is named after a species of tree, and an other one where every street is named after musical instruments, and all of that is very interesting in my opinion. The point of wikidata is to have this public knowledge structured in a way that allows for those analysis, and in some way, linking osm and wikidata is just an extentsion of that wealth of data. 
A human looking at a map knows what a raspberry is, but the more of name:etyomlogy:wikidata tags exist, the more it will be possible to analyse how societies honor people, places or concepts by naming their streets. 
I do understand where you're coming from though. I think I will keep it there, mostly for the aforementioned reason, but also because it's not wrong and although it might technically be unnecessary in some view, it doesn't hurt having it.
pwbriggs (2026-05-29 22:35:05+00:00): Website appears to be broken.
brianstrauch (2026-05-29 23:36:55+00:00): they just put a sign up on their door with this url. they open in a few days so i assume they'll launch the website before then!
pwbriggs (2026-05-29 23:49:12+00:00): Cool, thanks!
streckenkundler (2026-05-29 20:03:45+00:00): Hei, Danke, aber die Lage passt nicht... Parkplatzabstände stimmen nicht zum Luftbild! Dann, wenn diese Detailerfassung:  Ganz wichtig (!!!) da fehlen noch: parking_space=disabled... mindestens 8 Stellplätze in Richtung Bahnhof... und, und, und...

Darum, betreibe ich dieses Mikromapping nur an eher seltenen Stellen... :|

streckenkundler

streckenkundler
Baloo Uriza (2026-06-04 03:49:04+00:00): There's actually a State Farm preset in StreetComplete.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183372802
Mohamed_Taha (2026-06-01 11:53:10+00:00): Hello arafqus-dh,
Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap in Algeria.
I noticed the addition of toll=no on the following ways (Autoroute Alger – Tizi Ouzou).
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/354201208
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/297276816
Could you please share the source or local/on-the-ground evidence for this tag?
We are asking because roads tagged as highway=motorway are often associated with toll information and are commonly mapped with toll=yes, so we would like to verify the situation for consistency and accuracy.
OSM Wiki reference (toll=*):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:toll
Best regards,
Mohamed_Taha
NeisRevert (2026-05-29 20:10:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/183373243
where the comment is: "Vandalism"
NeisRevert (2026-05-29 20:14:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/183373379
where the comment is: "Vandalism"
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-30 05:07:51+00:00): User has been blocked https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20728
Nekoatthegates (2026-06-01 15:01:20+00:00): Correction: Source used was Esri World Imagery.
cyclist789 (2026-06-02 12:34:14+00:00): \*reversed
jmvet24 (2026-05-29 21:02:43+00:00): Hi all, I'm a new editor and I have just added several features to this Travelodge hotel, including a grass traffic island in the car park.  Could an experienced editor check that it was done correctly?  Thanks, Jim.
yelisey90 (2026-05-31 17:46:52+00:00): highway=construction + construction=footway?
xkillah (2026-06-19 07:56:58+00:00): @yelisey90 thnx, fixed
recollect124 (2026-05-29 21:50:56+00:00): Center row of detached homes have West facing carports creating separation along Turner Street.
recollect124 (2026-05-29 21:52:06+00:00): South row of detached homes have North facing carports, again separation on Tuner Street.
kwiatek_123 (2026-06-01 07:14:37+00:00): Wczoraj jechałem jezdnią południową i obie jezdnie miały otwarty tylko 1 pas ruchu dla wszystkich a południowa miała jeszcze buspas jeśli dobrze pamiętam.  Z pewnością utrudnienia się nie skończyły.
kwiatek_123 (2026-06-01 07:15:05+00:00): Nie było podniesienia ograniczenia prędkości do 80.
syntex (2026-06-01 08:56:13+00:00): Zgadza się, nie edytowałem znacznika maxspeed bo nie znam nowych ograniczeń prędkości, a lanes są tak oznaczone jak napisałeś w komentarzu - 1 pas w jedną stronę i 1 pas + buspas w drugą. Jeżeli znasz jakie jest tymczasowe ograniczenie, możesz tu napisać : )
kwiatek_123 (2026-06-02 20:21:26+00:00): Dodałem ograniczenie do 50km/h - takie jest wskazane na znakach

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183563404
syntex (2026-06-02 20:54:17+00:00): 👍
Unbeatable101 (2026-06-01 01:15:39+00:00): Hello, I've reverted this changeset due to the low quality title and incorrect information. The speedlimit here is 40.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183473165
Glassman (2026-05-30 22:34:02+00:00): Instead of adding the ALPR to the buiding, it should just be a node. Can you fix this edit? Let me know if you need help.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183376803
mccflute (2026-06-02 05:01:29+00:00): Not sure how! I tried to select the node where it is when setting it up, but couldn't figure out how to mark that as an ALPR camera. I would love some help. I'm going to fiddle and see if I have more luck
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183376803
mccflute (2026-06-02 05:22:25+00:00): Ok managed to update the node! Now unsure of how to remove previous changes.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183376803
Glassman (2026-06-03 00:35:50+00:00): I removed the flock device node from the house and moved it to the front of the house. If you could move the node to it's physical location that would be great. 

Check out https://deflock.org/report to get a great app to add Flock devices. Much easier than using the browser editor. The same page does have instructions on how to add a device using the browser editor.
NorthCrab_upload (2026-05-29 22:31:05+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13894801281
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13894801287
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13894801288

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀