piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2025-05-20 14:22:16+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
About High buildings. 
You've mapped several times a building as 3 separate buildings.2 x different levels as 2 buildings
1 x a siding as 1 building.
Check this guide to see how these buildings ought to be mapped.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1z7uDwYm4oNmlexHIhJxGCjPpNhCQAgRia5aEJr_4MwM/edit?usp=sharing

Best regards
rempshaener (2025-04-10 17:16:14+00:00): Hallo,

du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.

Folgende Anmerkungen:
- Die Doppelerfassung der Adresse ist nicht sinnvoll. Ich empfehle, die Adresse am Parkplatz wieder zu entfernen.
- Das access=für_vereinsmitglieder ist kein zulässiger Wert; besser wäre access=private.

Bei Fragen bitte melden.
Viele Grüße
eggie (2025-04-10 10:54:42+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
DomeF (2025-04-22 12:10:41+00:00): Ciao ancora, stavo vedendo con osmose che alcuni tag hanno delle cose da correggere, il numero di telefono necessita del prefisso, quello l'ho messo gia' io, mentre gli orari di apertura non sono messi correttamente, per quello ti conviene vedere meglio come fare a questo link: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours.
Buon mapping!
ivanbranco (2025-04-22 12:19:05+00:00): Se sono gli orari delle messe, andrebbe utilizzato piuttosto https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:service_times
eggie (2025-04-11 07:53:27+00:00): Dag donux..
Het is in ieder geval duidelijk dat er ook een fietsenmakersonderdeel zit. 
MVG
eggie
rskedgell (2025-04-10 12:31:01+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for adding your business. I've tweaked the tagging a little. I've also added The Angel Inn.
MxxCon (2025-04-13 05:36:22+00:00): Hello.
Why did you delete old_name tag here?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164760695
MapSpot (2025-04-11 15:57:07+00:00): Why did you remove the wikidata tags from this hospital?
DD1GJ (2025-04-11 06:39:35+00:00): Änderungen rückgängig gemacht, da der gesamte Gebäudekomplex gelöscht wurde.

Hallo JensSchmidt, willkommen bei OSM und danke für Deine Ortskenntnisse. Leider kam es in der Vergangenheit bei Deinen Edits öfters zu versehentlichen Beschädigungen der Kartendaten und Deine Änderungssatzkommentare entsprechen nicht mehr den durchgeführten Änderungen.

Hinweise für das Arbeiten mit OSM findest Du unter https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Viele Grüße, Joachim
JensSchmidt (2025-04-11 07:07:45+00:00): Hallo Joachim, das tut mir leid und ich gelobe Besserung (und intensives Tutorialstudium). Grüße Jens
SpinOff (2025-08-27 21:16:48+00:00): Hej. Jaki jest powód dodania access=no?
Omega933 (2025-08-28 07:08:03+00:00): Cześć,

Droga jest nieprzejezdna (ograniczona bramą). Choć domyślam się po Twoim komentarzu, że z racji ruchu pieszych powinien być inny tag wstawiony
SpinOff (2025-08-29 20:44:27+00:00): access=no to bezwzględny zakaz wstępu dla wszystkich. Dużo zależy od tego z jakiego powodu jest tam postawiona brama.
SpinOff (2025-08-30 21:20:08+00:00): Byłem tam od strony południowej i dowiedziałem się że właścicielem terenu jest jakaś wspólnota. Ogrodzili się bramą od południa, ale od północy nie ma chyba żadnych przeszkód. Oznaczę to jako highway=service.

Trzeba by jeszcze zobaczyć jak wygląda oznakowanie przy skrzyżowaniu z ulicami Przedszkolną i Chopina. Jeśli jest jakiś zakaz, to access=no pasuje.
SpinOff (2025-09-11 22:24:15+00:00): Sprawa z dostępem od północy jest według miejscowych skomplikowana. Dodałem odpowiednie tagi.
yrtimiD (2025-04-13 15:49:23+00:00): Hi, what is your source of data? the address node you added here is looks too suspicious since different address is already mapped on this location. 

Regardless, you have a common error: the addr:street should be equal to the name of nearby street.

Please fix or revert!
yrtimiD (2025-04-13 16:18:51+00:00): This changeset added duplicate or incorrect address

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164902845
OmerMadlan (2025-04-21 09:25:11+00:00): תודה על ההבהרה לגבי שם הרחוב המדויק. נמחק את הנקודה.
HomeUA (2025-04-10 14:53:40+00:00): Друже, перестань вносити дані по карті не знаючи місцевість. Ти додав будинки там де їх немає в реалі.
HomeUA (2025-04-10 15:58:49+00:00): Work on this part of the map is still in progress. Adding objects is still planned, but you have interfered with the work with your “corrections”. Please roll back the update, everything is as it was.
worldqafix (2025-04-11 17:50:50+00:00): Будинки є на карті Esri World Imagery, можливо тип не спіпадає. Наприклад roof, а у мене yes
worldqafix (2025-04-11 18:02:23+00:00): Дещо змінив в 164828004. Всього побачити важко. Я за процес постійних поліпшень і твій фідбек також допомагає.
HomeUA (2025-04-12 09:51:40+00:00): Дякую за розуміння)
Sweduke (2025-04-10 14:00:54+00:00): The crossings have been changed from railway crossing to tram crossing which is more correct: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Dtram_crossing
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164763072
Sweduke (2025-04-10 14:03:50+00:00): Crossings have been changed from railway crossing to tram crossing, which is more correct: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Dtram_crossing
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164763072
archie (2025-04-10 14:12:12+00:00): I am aware of the controversy regarding this tagging. Tagging was correct. You changed it bec you like the other tagging. This is not accaptable.
Sweduke (2025-04-10 14:25:02+00:00): Ok, accepted that a "correction" from one correct tagging to an other isn't necessary and sometimes subjective.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164763072
archie (2025-04-10 14:58:41+00:00): We know. Your favourite tagging  is in use in only two places in tot 5 instances on the entire European continent. Good try!
Branko Kokanovic (2025-04-16 18:05:03+00:00): reverted based on government data and our agreement on community forum and DINA site in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165040842. "Stara put" doesn't even look like Serbian and we don't put "prefix" tag
sheldonelectric (2025-04-17 12:05:16+00:00): I understand you have imported the data from governmental database, but there is no sign "Seoska" I only see "Stara Put" in 2 different locations of this way. If it's not ok to use a official_name, maybe can i use local_name for the street sign?
Branko Kokanovic (2025-04-17 12:16:08+00:00): I already put them under "loc_name". Not sure what this name is...it doesn't look like Serbian (nor Bulgarian for that matter) - as it should be "Stari put". Maybe this is sign combined from "Stara Kalna" and "put" or "Kalna" is not visible anymore, so it was "Stara Kalna put". Maybe this was old street name and old signs in which case, it is just a matter of time (measured in years) when signs will be replaced. I am puzzled as you:)
sheldonelectric (2025-04-21 18:14:56+00:00): I passed again and the sign says "улича Стари пут", if i spell it correctly this time. Without latin.
sheldonelectric (2025-04-21 18:31:54+00:00): I also noticed that I had tagged the wrong segment, so i updated it correctly this time. Please check again.
Branko Kokanovic (2025-04-26 17:24:51+00:00): 👌
eggie (2025-04-10 11:15:30+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
mueschel (2025-04-13 08:06:51+00:00): Hi,
the language code 'uum' doesn't seem to exist. Could you check that?
Mazda05 (2025-04-13 15:51:49+00:00): https://iso639-3.sil.org/code_tables/639/data/u
OmerMadlan (2025-04-21 09:16:43+00:00): ניתן להסיר.
מתנצלים על העריכה השגויה.
PizzaTreeIsland (2025-04-10 12:56:29+00:00): Thank you for surveying this area! Please note that the correct tag for dog permissions is dog, not dogs. 

Thanks and happy mapping!
sjorford (2025-04-10 13:07:16+00:00): Thanks for the heads up! I will fix this up when I get home
PizzaTreeIsland (2025-04-10 13:24:14+00:00): I already fixed it. I just wanted to tell you before you add more wrong dog permissions. Enjoy your walk!
Sweduke (2025-04-10 14:10:53+00:00): The crossings have been changed from railway crossing to tram crossing which is more correct: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Dtram_crossing
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164763785
eggie (2025-04-10 11:53:59+00:00): Dag Hartenheer  Dit is helaas niet correct. We werken in Nederland met adresnodes (import) en de bewuste adresnode is al aanwezig... dus het adres 'moet' weer verwijderd worden van de gebouwomtrek.

MVG
eggie
Hartenheer61 (2025-04-10 12:56:15+00:00): Gaat lekker met mij…….
Ik ga het weer verwijderen. Dank!
Vr.gr. Henk
eggie (2025-04-10 13:00:45+00:00): Henk.. Zal best lukken.  :)
mapse
eggie
s777n (2025-04-14 20:38:40+00:00): Здравствуйте. Чтобы добавить объект недостаточно просто добавить имя на здание нужно еще добавить теги объекта например магазина. Исправлено
HirschKauz (2025-04-11 10:06:48+00:00): hi! 
kleine Anmerkung: 
Bitte Telefonnummern immer mit der Vorwahl und ohne die Null. 
zB +49 1234 56789

Grüße und weiterhin viel Spaß
MxxCon (2025-04-13 05:40:37+00:00): Rather than stuffing specific location's name into the name= tag, it's better to add it to branch=
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164764758
DUGA (2025-04-14 01:05:21+00:00): I think it is both, doable.
literan (2025-04-10 19:51:48+00:00): и зачем тут тег foot=no? вы полагаете, что тут по проездам запрещено ходить пешком? 
https://yandex.ru/maps/-/CHVXBHIL

откачу
yrtimiD (2025-04-27 19:49:38+00:00): hi, what do you mean "exclude mass usage"? is this road physically accessible by vehicle or no?
os-emmer (2025-05-04 17:12:04+00:00): Hello ch4nd3y and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
You added this object to the map:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12732471492
Unfortunatly you used an unusual combination of tags. What exactly is this? Is it a school?
ch4nd3y (2025-05-04 17:32:17+00:00): this place go by the name “Highschool chowk” as it is near to tribhuvan highschool. It is a road junction and the area is commonly known by highschool chowk
Famlam (2025-04-11 21:18:03+00:00): Hi Aardappelkroket, wat is de (OSM-compatibele) bron van deze wijziging? 

Ik ken dit gebouw via via, zonder geautoriseerde toegangspas kom je hier niet in. Dus waarschijnlijk is dit klakkeloos van een of andere website overgenomen.

Gezien je als enige opgegeven bron luchtfoto's hebt gebruikt, betwijfel ik of je daaruit de openingstijden en architect van hebt kunnen afleiden.

Ik zal het terugdraaien. Het viel me oorspronkelijk op omdat de Engelse naam als hoofdnaam staat en de Nederlandse als alternatieve taal
Famlam (2025-04-11 21:22:43+00:00): Openingstijden verwijderd in changeset 164766021. Wellicht de websitebeheerder een mailtje sturen dat het niet open is
Mannivu (2025-04-10 15:18:52+00:00): Hi. Trees are not redundant, they're part of the place and therefore deserve a place in the database. Please don't remove them before discussing it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164766039
Mannivu (2025-04-10 15:33:29+00:00): Undiscussed removal of tree

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164775108
Mannivu (2025-04-10 15:33:58+00:00): Undiscussed removal of tree

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164775131
NeisReview (2025-04-10 17:20:10+00:00): #NoTags

Hi, welcome to OSM.

I've reviewed your latest map edits and it seems that this changeset and more you created includes nodes and ways without any tags. Could there have been an issue during the mapping process?

Looking forward to your response.

Thank you!
NeisReview (2025-04-10 17:16:00+00:00): #AdminBoundary #RelationCheck

Hello, welcome to OSM.

In this changeset, a boundary (relation) and its name has been modified by you. 

Could you please confirm if these edits were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

Thank you!
Aetolia (2025-04-11 01:31:52+00:00): The boundary in this map has been tampered. Lake Gistova and the area around it has been sliced from Greek sovereignty and placed inside Albanian jurisdiction. The also have tampered with the Google Map as well. It is an issue that has started currently with some cycles from Albania that are removing the border pyramids. Please check Sentinel 2 map which is European and an official EU one if you have any doubts on this matter.  
https://browser.dataspace.copernicus.eu/?zoom=16&lat=40.36496&lng=20.79214&themeId=DEFAULT-THEME&visualizationUrl=U2FsdGVkX19BtvFoPcTS2mMlFNfsqnwBagkI0QqM2vGK78hW5vXvJ0DEs2waLuXn0Si%2FUSAdxbBecuR8848MG9qx45U6FkiJnwHKh9lHomv2Xij7VBIEkVfFdcNvR7Wh&datasetId=S2_L2A_CDAS&demSource3D=%22MAPZEN%22&cloudCoverage=30&dateMode=SINGLE
Here is also the official site of the Greek government of Greece about Lake Gistova or Drakolimni. 
https://www.visitgreece.gr/inspirations/dragon-lakes/
I am looking forward for a solution on this matter.  Thank you for your attention, NM
Aetolia (2025-04-11 01:55:09+00:00): Please correct the following error as it can been seen in this map. https://mapper.acme.com/?ll=40.36214,20.75867&z=13&t=T
gurglypipe (2025-04-10 14:02:47+00:00): Hiya, thanks for the attention to detail you’re giving to Leighton Moss.

A few questions on this changeset:

Why delete the residential area around https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/500763160?

And why change the causeway from bicycle=designated to bicycle=destination? If no through cycling is allowed, that should already be inferred by the router from the fact the path at the eastern end is access=private for bicycles. bicycle=designated is the correct tagging for its legal status as a public bridleway, aiui.

Thanks
gurglypipe (2025-04-12 15:34:50+00:00): I’ve fixed those two issues in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164861203 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164861007, please reply if I’ve made a mistake
NeisReview (2025-04-10 17:19:08+00:00): #NoTags

Hi, welcome to OSM.

I've reviewed your latest map edits and it seems that this changeset you created includes nodes and ways without any tags. Could there have been an issue during the mapping process?

Looking forward to your response.

Thank you!
Sanniu (2026-01-04 15:31:07+00:00): Hi, you set https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/87902130 one-way - making it not accessible.
Is it by mistake or there is some other road not mapped there?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-22 07:27:10+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12744579056/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
dpolovinkin (2025-04-14 07:37:44+00:00): hi! why "path to archeological site" is viewpoint?
Patchanka (2025-04-13 08:07:31+00:00): bonjour
vous avez créé une maison d'hotes, au à une endroit où il n'y a pas de bâtiment, c'est plus ou moins dans la forêt...
Pouvez-vous préciser son emplacement svp ?
BNPetersen (2025-04-13 08:24:11+00:00): 8 rue de Pannecau, 64390
Patchanka (2025-04-13 08:42:30+00:00): merci j'ai corrigé l'emplacement : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12744620001
Patchanka (2025-12-31 13:32:58+00:00): bonjour
le numéro de téléphone ne semble pas correct non plus. Vous avez indiqué : 004526856721
Quel est le bon numéro ?
BNPetersen (2025-12-31 14:00:21+00:00): C’est mon numéro correct pour WhatsApp
Patchanka (2025-12-31 14:26:46+00:00): Merci pour votre réponse.
Désolée je ne comprends pas quel est le soucis alors...
rempshaener (2025-04-10 16:49:34+00:00): Hallo,

du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.

Ich habe eine organisatorische Anmerkung:
Solange du die Liste des Landkreises nur zur groben Lokalisierung nutzt, sehe ich kein Problem. Eine Übernahme ohne Kontrolle vor Ort oder per Luftbild wäre hingegen nicht ganz unproblematisch; zum einem käme es einem Import nahe (siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Import/Guidelines) zum anderen wäre im Speziellen zu prüfen, ob die Daten des Landkreises verwendet werden dürfen.

Weiterhin viel Spaß beim Mappen.
Viele Grüße
yelisey90 (2025-04-21 17:00:50+00:00): reverted: I've checked, both paths are there, as well as the picnic site:
https://imgur.com/a/Q4q5ttM
https://imgur.com/a/PFYLzw1
https://imgur.com/a/hsDtbN6

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165249941
Tatfahren (2025-04-10 13:45:20+00:00): Wenn die Tür die Nummer 3 hat, wäre ref aber richtig. Wenn das in Osmand falsch angezeigt wird, musst du das den Entwicklern melden.
pavvv (2025-04-10 14:29:18+00:00): Od kiedy highway=primary to droga krajowa? Od tego jest highway:category:pl.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:highway%3Dprimary#Zastosowanie_na_mapie_Polski
pavvv (2025-04-10 14:41:08+00:00): A tę nazwę wziąłeś z tablicy znajdującej się w terenie czy skąd? Ogólnie podawaj źródła do zmian; szczególnie przy takich, które wyrwane z kontekstu mogą się wydawać jak łamanie dobrych praktyk jak np. dodawanie nazw opisowych.
NeisReview (2025-04-10 17:13:52+00:00): #NameChanges

Hi, welcome to OSM.

In the past 12 hours, you have made numerous name changes across various changesets. This included modifying names as well as removing other name:*. Are these changes being made in coordination with the local community? Additionally, could you share more information about your sources?

I would appreciate a response.

Thank you.

You can find an overview of the recent changesets at the following link: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?uid=22652297
ski-planet (2025-04-11 05:38:17+00:00): Hi,
The numerous name changes made yesterday are a revert to the name changes made a few days before. The local community wasn't agree with theses changes.

Thank you for your control.
eggie (2025-04-10 12:59:01+00:00): adresnode verschoven
kapazao (2025-04-10 13:18:17+00:00): Hola, la gasolinera ya existía como área exterior. Esto que has modificado a gasolinera es simplemente el techo de esta.
Por favor ten cuidado a la hora de hacer cambios y revisa bien lo existente en el mapa.
Un saludo
mavl (2025-04-10 13:12:23+00:00): Здравствуйте. Подскажите, пожалуйста, почему вы удаляете из названий улиц слово "улица"? Например, здесь:  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/244702773/history
yrtimiD (2025-04-17 12:27:55+00:00): hi, when you add address to the building, please do not forget to remove separate address node near. otherwise we'll have duplicate addresses. Also, if there is a building polygon - it's better to add address to it and not create separate address node near
Nathan_A_RF (2025-04-27 19:15:49+00:00): Hi, please remember to change maxspeed:type tags when changing maxspeed tags
Nathan_A_RF (2025-04-27 19:19:37+00:00): You also appear to have missed several sections when changing the maxspeed tags. Please be more careful in future.
felipeeugenio (2025-04-10 13:13:11+00:00): Id	Contributor	Tmstmp UTC	Action	Comment
4701800	felipeeugenio	2025-04-10 15:09	closed	ok
4701808	felipeeugenio	2025-04-10 15:09	closed	ok
4701801	felipeeugenio	2025-04-10 15:09	closed	ok
4701802	felipeeugenio	2025-04-10 15:09	closed	ok
4701809	felipeeugenio	2025-04-10 15:09	closed	ok
4701803	felipeeugenio	2025-04-10 15:09	closed	ok
4701804	felipeeugenio	2025-04-10 15:09	closed	ok
4701805	felipeeugenio	2025-04-10 15:09	closed	ok
4701806	felipeeugenio	2025-04-10 15:09	closed	ok
Cyrille37 (2025-04-13 09:54:34+00:00): Hello Mohamed

The CNER published a Morocco Road Network via a announce in talk-ma@ mailing list.

I've put data here : https://map.comptoir.net/maroc-reseau-routier-2025-01/ with links to discussions.

For some days I'm updated the roads network, but it seems that you are reverting my contributions.

Do you have a better data source ?

We can talk about this update here : https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/morocco-maroc-reseau-routier-mise-a-jour-2025-01/128074

Best regards
Cyrille37.
Cyrille37 (2025-04-13 10:31:34+00:00): Please, can you revert your change ? Or give me permission to revert ?
Cyrille37 (2025-04-13 10:32:22+00:00): I've write a announce on the DigitalEgypt talk page : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:DigitalEgypt#Morocco_roads_network_2025_update

Best regards
Cyrille37
Mohamed_Taha (2025-04-13 13:07:58+00:00): Hello Cyrille,
Thank you for your message this changeset was uploaded by mistake. I apologize for this error, I already fixed it, and we will be more careful next time. Let us collaborate to make OSM better.
Best regards,
Mohamed Taha
Cyrille37 (2025-04-13 13:17:31+00:00): Thank you Mohamed for your fast reaction :-)

I'm tagging Morocco roads netwok update changesets with #MA_RR_202501

Thanks & cheers
Cyrille37.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-09 08:24:34+00:00): Seems the blatantly-promotional description=* tag added by a SEO spammer was also copied over. ;) Cleaned in changeset 183862167

https://osm.org/changeset/183862167
eserte (2025-04-10 17:24:05+00:00): Hi!

Ist die Überfahrt Großbeerenstraße - Daimlerstraße tatsächlich wieder geöffnet? Wenn ja, können dann die Notes https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3210197 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4273515 geschlossen werden?

Gruß,
    Slaven
MorahT (2025-04-11 11:25:42+00:00): One of those is a Public Footpath (KBY 19) and needs to be re-added.

https://www.gloucestershire.gov.uk/prow/rights-of-way-online-map/
MorahT (2025-04-11 12:14:28+00:00): Re-added public footpath (KBY 19).

Changeset:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164813040
pavvv (2025-04-10 14:33:33+00:00): A sprawdziłeś znaki w terenie? Do tego czasu zostaw ref=5. Bo teraz fixme nie ma sensu.
felipeeugenio (2025-04-10 13:28:03+00:00): Nota resuelta #4694796
NeisBot (2025-04-10 13:33:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam
Łukasz Lisiecki (2025-04-10 15:48:53+00:00): Wypożyczalnia rowerów tradycyjnych i elektrycznych wraz z darmowym parkingiem.
Łukasz Lisiecki (2025-04-10 16:10:16+00:00): Zmiana zrobiona.
NeisReview (2025-04-10 17:10:17+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/164776324
Marek-M (2025-10-21 06:29:25+00:00): Kolejna nieistniejąca droga - w OSM nie mapujemy rzeczy, które nie istnieją. Jakie jest źródło informacji o tej drodze?
Marek-M (2025-10-21 06:27:39+00:00): Ta droga nie istnieje - co to za fikcja, którą tworzysz?
Marek-M (2025-10-21 06:30:10+00:00): Jakie jest źródło tego miejsca?
pavvv (2025-04-10 14:35:22+00:00): Dzięki za zajęcie się sprawą.
ma-rt-in (2025-04-10 19:31:40+00:00): Hey,
du hast hier das Dach der Gänge als corridor umgetaggt, Absicht?
Ich habs wieder zurück geändert und die Fläche angepasst.

VG
Pan (2025-04-10 21:43:29+00:00): Dear Habi, you are very right, I made a copy and paste mistake. Thanks for correcting.
Pan (2025-04-10 23:44:40+00:00): BTW, I don't share the idea that the source tags are useless. It is quite useful for the future mappers to assess which features were mapped according to which sources and decide to modify them or not. It is always possible to query the changesets but this makes the editing process more cumbersome.
habi (2025-04-12 15:45:30+00:00): I don't think that querying the changesets makes the process more cumbersome, I think that having unnecessary tags on the object themselves leads to stale data, because editors might update the feature and *not* update the source tag at all.
NeisRevert (2025-04-10 17:26:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/164780019 where the changeset comment is: 
Remove vandalism