piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
bkil (2024-04-12 09:29:51+00:00): Azt nem mondta, hogy itt az OSM közreműködő, a Gmaps közreműködő vagy a Google maga volt rosszindulatú. Lehetett bármely upstream az, vagy lehetett véletlen is - a lényeg, hogy bíróságon erre lehet hivatkozni a Trap street koncepciója szerint, és nekünk elég ezt tudnunk. A más térképekről való minden másolás ezért nem megengedhető.
woodpeck_repair (2024-05-30 15:16:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 152041031, 152040999, 152041007, 152041053, 152041069 where the changeset comment is: revert changes by self-deleted user Harsha1999 after community complaints, DWG ticket #2024041110000024
tekim (2024-04-10 14:26:55+00:00): Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap!  Thank you for your edit to the map, and for citing your source - that is important.  Unfortunately, Google Maps, which you cited as your source, is not allowed to be used when editing OpenStreetMap due to Google's terms of use.
tekim (2024-04-10 14:27:17+00:00): Reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149822763
phoenixsaigon1698 (2024-04-10 08:52:40+00:00): https://imgur.com/a/Rap8p95 
Cấm quay đầu theo kiểu bạn vẽ là kiểu nào vậy? Logic kiểu gì mà đòi revert changeset của người khác? Đã nói bao nhiêu lần không tiếp thu, ko phản hồi lại.
Glassman (2024-04-11 16:37:45+00:00): If multiple facilities are in a building, just use a node for each feature inside the building. Let me know if you have any questions.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149805134
woodpeck_repair (2024-05-30 15:16:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 152041031, 152040999, 152041007, 152041053, 152041069 where the changeset comment is: revert changes by self-deleted user Harsha1999 after community complaints, DWG ticket #2024041110000024
Glassman (2024-04-11 16:29:43+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149805207
Lyon-St-Clair (2024-04-10 19:33:17+00:00): Bonjour, attention à ne pas utiliser building=commercial pour délimiter un terrain, sinon ça créé des immeubles inexistants.
Glassman (2024-04-11 16:30:00+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149805317
tastrax (2024-04-10 12:12:28+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
Dimacn (2024-04-11 05:39:10+00:00): Дорога которую вы добавили должна иметь статус service - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1271381068  Пожалуйста изучите классификацию дорог в OSM - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Highway_classification
phoenixsaigon1698 (2024-04-10 08:58:46+00:00): https://imgur.com/a/i9tY1RI 
Bạn có thật sự hiểu "from" "via" "to" member của 1 cái no U turn ko vậy mà cấm quay đầu From Nguyễn Hoàng to Lê Đức Thọ.
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-23 19:28:04+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151740159
Ltrlg (2024-04-16 11:36:55+00:00): Le point de jonction (https://osm.org/node/633212072) a été déplacé de plus de 250 m dans cette modification. Je vous recommande de vérifier les avertissements de l’éditeur avant d’envoyer vos modifications : en l’occurrence, il vous a prévenu que vous créiez un croisement entre la route et un bâtiment.
krza (2024-04-10 08:41:19+00:00): Die PLZ 50735 ist falsch. Richtig ist 50725. Bitte nicht ändern, wenn man keine robste Info hat. Danke. Abgesehen davon wurde offenbar ein Knoten gelöscht. Ich muss das gleich mal bereinigen.
krza (2024-04-10 08:56:14+00:00): 50769 meinte ich. Die PLZ der Ford-Werke hat nichts mit der lokalen PLZ von Merkenich zu tun.
silversurfer83 (2024-04-10 10:05:07+00:00): Moin :)

zwei Fragen/Anmerkungen:
-Warum hat ein Wendekreis eine Adresse?
-iberges scheint ein stumpfes Schema F zu haben. Wenn dir häufiger Probleme dieser Art auffallen und der Kollege nicht reagiert ist das schlecht und muss im Zweifel mal eskaliert werden

Grüße nach Köln
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149806028
krza (2024-04-10 10:19:06+00:00): Das mit der Adresse muss wohl ein copy/paste-Fehler gewesen sein. Ich habe die laut History selber da rein geschrieben ;) Eigentlich war sie für den Knoten darüber gedacht, der das Entwicklungszentrum bezeichnet. Dieser Fehler war aber ja schon "freundlicherweise" von jemand korrigiert worden, wenn auch überkorrigiert.

Zur PLZ: Großkunden haben oft eigene PLZ. Daher der Unterschied/Irrtum. Das muss man halt wissen oder rausfinden vor einer "Korrektur". Bislng war mir der User nicht aufgefallen, also alles gut aus meiner Sicht.
CometSeeker (2024-05-01 13:41:08+00:00): Приветствую! Поясните, пожалуйста, изменение названия с учётом: https://nabchelny.ru/news/51559
maraf24 (2024-04-10 12:00:45+00:00): Radzę Ci zmienić treści komentarzy, takie obelgi będę zgłaszać.
user_16178067 (2024-04-10 15:46:20+00:00): Nie zesraj się kolego, bo sobie spodnie pobrudzisz
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-09 10:33:19+00:00): Hello!

You used
climbing:grade:uiaa=-6
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11806560958/history

Have you maybe meant
climbing:grade:uiaa=6-
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
jvaclavik (2025-12-09 11:05:05+00:00): You are right. Fixed. Thanks!
Glassman (2024-04-11 16:34:28+00:00): The building= tag is needed to describe the feature. 
I would suggest tagging it as building=apartment and removing the landuse and residential tag. 

Can you review this changeset? Thanks
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149806546
woodpeck_repair (2024-05-30 15:16:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 152041031, 152040999, 152041007, 152041053, 152041069 where the changeset comment is: revert changes by self-deleted user Harsha1999 after community complaints, DWG ticket #2024041110000024
Geo-Tobi (2024-09-08 14:09:21+00:00): Surface asphalt , aber tracktype grade2; das klingt unstimmig. Ist das Absicht?
giggls (2024-09-08 19:15:13+00:00): Das wurde nicht in diesem Changeset geändert sondern war vorher schon so. Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/104669022/history
giggls (2024-09-08 19:16:59+00:00): Oder anders formuliert. Schau mal in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/134414555
Geo-Tobi (2024-09-08 20:30:02+00:00): Ich bin in der Version verrutscht, entschuldige bitte. Alles gut.
SekeRob (2024-04-10 08:29:25+00:00): Road and railway corridors mapping continued thru large wood relation, prepping to split. Remove bridge from railway, change to tunnel for track. Many inner details added, outlines refined.
fortera_au (2024-04-10 10:29:03+00:00): Hi there, https://victoriancollections.net.au is copywrited, do we have permission to use information from there as a source?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149807470
TheSwavu (2024-04-10 11:19:49+00:00): I would be more concerned about the fact that I doubt anyone who lives here still calls it "Pioneer Rise".
fortera_au (2024-04-16 09:01:22+00:00): I reckon https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1271382924 should just be removed, there's already a landuse=residential area that covers this area.
Yog Sot (2024-04-10 21:32:25+00:00): Panie, a jak dojechać do centrum szkolenia wojsk? ^^
Filip009 (2024-04-11 08:42:29+00:00): Ste si istý týmto menom? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3342776977
TrickyFoxy (2024-04-10 11:08:23+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149814457
woodpeck_repair (2024-05-30 15:16:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 152041031, 152040999, 152041007, 152041053, 152041069 where the changeset comment is: revert changes by self-deleted user Harsha1999 after community complaints, DWG ticket #2024041110000024
woodpeck_repair (2024-05-30 15:16:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 152041031, 152040999, 152041007, 152041053, 152041069 where the changeset comment is: revert changes by self-deleted user Harsha1999 after community complaints, DWG ticket #2024041110000024
dzidek23 (2024-04-11 11:15:32+00:00): Cześć maciekjg,

to znowu ja, pewnie się ucieszysz ;)

Zastanawiam się, czy byłbyś w stanie dodać zdjęcie tego muralu do commons.wikimedia.org ?

Chociaż nie właśnie ją znalazłem :)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:MOs810_WG_35_2015_Dolnoslaskie_Zakamarki_II_(Mozaika,_Rynek,_Legnica,_Kopernik).JPG

Obiekty jak pomniki, murale czy inna sztuka bez zdjęcia i/lub dobrego opisu niewiele znaczą. Jak masz szansę, przechodzisz obok, zrób zdjęcie i zamieść w wikimedia.

Ten obiekt poprawilem,

pozdrawiam
Kovoschiz (2024-04-10 09:07:57+00:00): Please don't change minibus stops to franchised bus stops. Create a new point.
exarkun (2024-04-14 09:51:18+00:00): aus welchem Grund wurden die ganzen Gebäude und Flächen wieder auf layer=1 geändert? das ist falsch!
krza (2024-04-14 14:07:40+00:00): Wie oft denn noch: Es ging nicht um Gebäude (dazu htte ich ja im anderen CS was geschrieben), sondern um genau 2 Flächen. Und diese beiden Flächen habe ich wieder mit dem Layer versehen, weil sie sonst mit der darunter liegenden Parkplatzfläche kollidieren. Ganz einfach.
exarkun (2024-04-14 16:31:25+00:00): falsch, https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=149808725
und die 2 Flächen schweben auch nicht in der Luft
krza (2024-04-14 17:26:40+00:00): Okay, jetzt sehe ich, worauf Du mit den Gebäuden hinaus willst (Overpass-Link). Allerdings habe ich mit diesen Gebäuden überhaupt nichts zu tun. Eigentlich. Ich weiß also nicht so recht, wie ich es "geschafft" habe, sie zu verändern. Eigentlich hatte ich mir nur den Teil heruntergeladen, der mich betraf, und das waren 3 Objekte. Eins davon war ein Gebäude, das ich auch layer-frei gelassen hatte, weil korrekt. Das andere waren die beiden Flächen, denen ich wieder einen Layer gegeben hatte. Wie die anderen Objekte jetzt da reingeraten sind, weiß ich gerade auch nicht. In JOSM zumindest waren sie mir nicht aufgefallen.

Mit anderen Worten: Ohne die anderen Gebäude jetzt angeschaut zu haben, ist dort vermutlich jeweils kein Layer erforderlich, stimmt.

Nochmal zu den Flächen: Ich weiß nicht, ob Du das mit dem level-Key verwechselst oderso, aber der layer-Key wurde genau für sowas erfunden. Das hat auch nichts mit "in der Luft schweben" zu tun. Es ist kein 3D-Key, sondern ein Ordnungs-/Sortierungs-Key, wenn man so will.
phoenixsaigon1698 (2024-04-10 09:02:39+00:00): https://imgur.com/a/JmIigMK
Ngày mai team Grab tạo một chuyến xe ở tòa nhà trung tín Suced, kết thúc ở 57 Nguyễn Hoàng để coi routing chỉ như thế nào.
Frans S (2024-04-10 09:09:51+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. However, do not include the shadow line in your mapping.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149809093
woodpeck_repair (2024-05-30 15:16:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 152041031, 152040999, 152041007, 152041053, 152041069 where the changeset comment is: revert changes by self-deleted user Harsha1999 after community complaints, DWG ticket #2024041110000024
woodpeck_repair (2024-05-30 15:16:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 152041031, 152040999, 152041007, 152041053, 152041069 where the changeset comment is: revert changes by self-deleted user Harsha1999 after community complaints, DWG ticket #2024041110000024
filip769 (2024-04-10 15:26:15+00:00): zdravím, hodnota charge by podľa mňa mala byť "3 EUR/day"

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:charge
Frans S (2024-04-10 09:11:30+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)

Map more accurate ( Object is bigger than your mapping)
Square all buildings.


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149809315
Marek-M (2024-04-10 09:22:08+00:00): Cześć, tutaj https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1260765175 nazwa opisowa 'Budowa domków jednorodzinnych' nie jest prawidłowa. Lepiej to wrzucić do tagu description

Jeżeli ten kwartał ma jakąś nazwę deweloperską, to można jej użyć jako nazwy.
Marek-M (2024-04-10 09:23:48+00:00): Poprawiłem to osiedle: https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1260765175
StC (2024-04-30 10:25:45+00:00): Bonjour,

il y a plusieurs petits problèmes avec ce changeset (et avec quelques autres à Albanne) :
 - des problèmes sur les noms des voies : le mélange des majuscules et des minuscules est assez hasardeux, alors que c'est un point assez important dans les cartes.
- interruption d'itinéraires de randonnées ; ici, c'est le point Albannette situé au bout de la route d'Albannette qui a été supprimé et remplacé par un autre avec des tags différents, cassant la logique de l'itinéraire qui passe par là
 - interruption du passage entre la route (et son parking) et les chemins qui la rejoignent
 - les commentaires ne sont pas très informatifs. Ils sont censés aider les autres contributeurs, maintenant ou dans des années, à comprendre ce qui a été fait et pourquoi. Là, on n'y est pas vraiment :-)

Je vais faire de mon mieux pour réparer l'itinéraire, mais je ne pourrai pas m'occuper des problèmes plus généraux.
Frans S (2024-04-10 09:18:42+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. Just make sure to not include the shadow (black line) into your mapping

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149809364
Frans S (2024-04-10 09:20:30+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped.  
You oversized 1 complex building.  Don't  include the shadowline.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149809367
Frans S (2024-04-10 09:22:18+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped.  On remark. Map complex buildings not as just a rectangular building, but follow the rooflines.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149809371
euroPathfinder (2024-04-10 15:05:33+00:00): Hi gaborky, Du hattest eine Überprüfung deiner Änderungen angefordert. Ich habe mir das angeschaut, passt alles soweit. Danke für Deinen Beitrag!
Frans S (2024-04-10 09:24:05+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149809488
Frans S (2024-04-10 09:24:48+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149809546
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-12 05:48:50+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164841054
gscholz (2024-04-19 09:51:57+00:00): 

Hi Grannymeg,
your recent edits have left behind a big amount of errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-35.77814&lat=-8.23598&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Frans S (2024-04-10 09:31:37+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149809913
Frans S (2024-04-10 09:30:52+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. However, 1 complex building, with extension, just mapped as rectangular. Follow the roofline precisely.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149809921
Frans S (2024-04-10 09:29:12+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149809952
Frans S (2024-04-10 09:28:18+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. However, many buildings are not squared,
Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149809957
Frans S (2024-04-10 09:26:40+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149809965