piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Glassman (2024-02-02 20:12:40+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146884751
Glassman (2024-02-02 20:32:34+00:00): I think you want to tag the area as landuse=construction + construction=residential
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146884839
Glassman (2024-02-02 20:34:13+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

Landuse is typically around the property, not the building outline. Can you remove the landuse from the building and add it to the area - like the parcel area. Let me know if you need help
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146884971
seattlefyi (2024-01-31 03:15:27+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM! Thanks for editing. A few comments: Adding the building is appreciated, though the outline should be followed more closely, and each individual building mapped separately.
seattlefyi (2024-01-31 03:22:05+00:00): Also, the OSM convention is to place the school details (name, address, etc) on the school grounds rather than the building. (See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dschool) Most of the tags you added were already tagged that way. So I'd suggest removing the non-building specific tags, and placing them on the grounds instead.
seattlefyi (2024-01-31 03:22:54+00:00): If you could, give it a try! Thanks again.
Glassman (2024-02-02 20:40:37+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146885104
Baloo Uriza (2024-01-31 19:28:43+00:00): Phone should be the number in international format (eg +1 918 555 1212) and the unit number should just be 102 but otherwise seems to look good
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146885113
Glassman (2024-02-02 20:36:12+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.

#TIP: the area tag isn't necessary. Also if it is still under construction then it should be tagged as landuse=construction see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dconstruction
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146885122
Glassman (2024-02-02 20:36:38+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146885169
Glassman (2024-02-02 20:37:57+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

I would leave building=apartments off. Until they are visible to add, just map the landuse area. Can you remove the building tag?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146885288
Glassman (2024-02-02 20:39:07+00:00): Land use is typically the whole area around the building, not the building. Can you review this edit?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146885337
allen4names (2024-02-02 02:48:21+00:00): I do not think Starbucks takes up the entire area.
Glassman (2024-02-02 19:38:00+00:00): you add two different names and one unnamed section of what appears to be the same stream. Should all of the streams be named Baker Creek?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146885498
HellMap (2024-01-31 13:30:12+00:00): Hello,

Since your changesets do not specify a source, can you please clarify where these German language street names are from? Where could one verify these?

Thanks
Atalanttore (2024-01-31 15:27:07+00:00): Hi

See https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liste_der_deutschsprachigen_Stra%C3%9Fennamen_in_Riga
osmuser63783 (2024-04-22 08:08:16+00:00): Hi, could you have a look at this note please?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4209470

I've been looking at this map which was in the edi.bike newsletter, it's a great visualisation of the OSM cycle path data in Edinburgh https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1780187384266588494.html
osmuser63783 (2025-08-23 11:18:30+00:00): Hi, this location was flagged up by Sustrans (https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/differences-between-osm-and-sustrans-mapping-of-the-uk-national-cycle-network/134337) as a place where the data in the Sustrans GIS on where they think NCN1 runs doesn't match what's in OSM. So I cycled there and had a look. And indeed, according to signage, for some reason NCN1 goes via Wester Coates Road and Wester Coates Avenue, instead of the new cycleway and Wester Coates Terrace. The signs look new so I don't think it's just that no one has got round to updating the signage yet. Please let me know in case you have any thoughts on this at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4924330 I guess we could change the relation back to how it's signed on the ground, but also flag to Sustrans that there's a new cycleway here and it might make more sense to route the NCN1 over it? (Though I can hardly imagine that they have just overlooked this)
ottwiz (2024-03-29 16:22:26+00:00): Hi, what is the source for the Marrietta Memorial Emergency Hospital? Because i can't see it on any imagery (OSIP III, NAIP, Bing 2023, Esri World Imagery) I have access to.
rdelach (2024-03-29 17:16:27+00:00): The building is under construction and currently about 90% complete. I have paper drawings of the site plan and local knowledge, as I live nearby in Athens, Ohio.
ottwiz (2024-03-29 17:49:21+00:00): Ahh alright! :) Btw, if you're interested, at 3 PM EST, there's gonna be a mapathon event related to Athens County's infrastructure, organized by Jon Brier at Ohio University. (https://osmcal.org/event/2742/)
rdelach (2024-04-01 17:42:22+00:00): Yes, thanks. Jonathan let me know if was happening and I attended the mapathon at OU on Friday. :-)
scorpio1537 (2024-01-31 04:09:35+00:00): https://openriversfund.org/projects/yakima-river-basin/
Glassman (2024-01-31 19:43:10+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146886386
seattlefyi (2024-01-31 16:39:26+00:00): Hi, have a few review comments about house tagging, descriptive names, and the outline, but pretty wordy, so will send it separately!
Glassman (2024-02-02 20:41:42+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146886734
seattlefyi (2024-01-31 16:50:16+00:00): The tagging looks pretty good! Only suggestion is to use the squaring tool (iD shortcut 'q') and make the corners more closely match the imagery.
seattlefyi (2024-01-31 16:52:29+00:00): Oh, and also would remove the amenity=school tag here, since the building does not house a school. (The grounds which surround it are already tagged with the amenity tag, which is more correct.)
Ewen Hill (2024-01-31 08:39:52+00:00): Hi Vivien2 - Excellent edits - keep them coming
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146887170
DP24PH (2024-02-20 04:40:30+00:00): We will subject this changeset for multiple validations since it may cause conflict on our painted median system "a.k.a. double yellow line" where the NB right-in-right-out only rule is strictly implemented whereas turns from SB is strictly prohibited by both local and national government.


DP24
Lake Towada (2024-02-21 06:32:59+00:00): Hi DP24PH, thanks for reaching out! Upon revisiting the area I can now see that this edit creates conflict with the painted median system. I will remove https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11572020594 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1242105190 to remedy this. Happy Mapping!
arjunaraoc (2024-02-02 10:26:03+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).

Check my improvement: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146978899
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146887916
BR_pebble (2024-07-18 08:01:28+00:00): Hello mawutor
I have fixed validation errors between buildings: -25.7833652, 28.2558959;
-25.7831591, 28.2560362;
-25.7832069, 28.2560121;
-25.7831321, 28.2556464;
-25.784533, 28.2531989;
-25.7845108, 28.2519608;
-25.7841828, 28.2515725;
-25.7837849, 28.2524315;
-25.7834796, 28.2524393;
-25.7849243, 28.2514831;
-25.7849871, 28.2514064;
-25.7844404, 28.2516092;
-25.784062, 28.2515265;
-25.7836467, 28.2514923;
-25.7835745, 28.2514952;
-25.7801364, 28.2514852;
-25.7803542, 28.251459;
-25.7803776, 28.2515694; -25.7801784, 28.2514433;
-25.7845281, 28.2535208;
-25.7840744, 28.2519054;
Please inspect your task carefully before closing.
Happy Mapping!
Glassman (2024-01-31 19:52:26+00:00): There were 3 instances of the park. I removed all but one.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146888253
arjunaraoc (2024-02-02 10:26:46+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146888256
literan (2024-02-01 18:04:18+00:00): а может все же лучше psv=designated? да, сейчас только автобусы, но вдруг опять маршрутки появятся )
RCAirForce (2024-02-01 18:55:41+00:00): Я думал об этом, но ведь psv это вроде как и такси тоже, нет? А для такси это точно не предназначено
Supaplex (2024-01-31 07:11:41+00:00): 不把點改成區域，將整個駕訓班範圍畫出來？
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146888502
LuckyTiger88 (2024-01-31 07:37:56+00:00): 有的 後面的更新有標
Glassman (2024-02-02 20:14:21+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146888605
crabctrl (2024-01-31 06:00:26+00:00): Hi, this is my first time contributing so I wanted to make sure I got everything right; this is a place I frequent very often (typically twice a week). I know from first hand experience that they are exclusively vegan, and that they accept Visa as that's how I pay.
joel56dt (2024-01-31 18:50:12+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for contributing! This is all great info that I see you have added. Let me know if you have any questions.

There is a great website that shows just vegetarian restaurants using OSM, not sure if you have seen it:
https://www.veggiekarte.de/?lang=en#14.0000/49.2388/-123.0476
Dodko (2024-01-31 09:14:54+00:00): Vrátil som tú zmazanú budovu a opravil geometriu
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=146894720
Dodko (2024-01-31 09:17:37+00:00): Alebo je celkom zbúraná? Nebola len skrátená?
petosiso (2024-01-31 09:43:22+00:00): Zdravim, ano je celkom zburana. Bol to stary rodicovsky dom, cislo domu 43 sa presunulo na tu mensiu budovu nad nim - ako som tam zakresloval. Popri tom na pozemku vznikla aj novostavba  s cislom 1362.
Dakujem.
Dodko (2024-01-31 09:48:18+00:00): Ok zmazal som ju.
Sajeevini sivajothy (2024-05-22 10:53:01+00:00): This application requires me to evaluate everything as good or bad, with no middle ground. If I mark something as bad, it could be because it doesn't adhere to the OSM tagging scheme. I will provide a changeset comment explaining my findings.


Here you Digitized a territory road but in Your Changest comment, you said Residential way. Please accurately mark the feature on the map and remember to include a clear changeset comment, for example: "Created Riad, Place Name, District Names, Country Name, and Suitable Hashtag."
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146889324
JalapaoDesert (2024-05-23 09:52:41+00:00): Sounds good. Have a great day!
crabctrl (2024-01-31 06:36:01+00:00): The diet tags apply to ALL Panago locations in BC as far as I'm aware (and Ontario as well but I have not surveyed Ontario; likely it applies to all Panago locations in general, but I know there are different menus in different provinces so I would be cautious to make that assumption). No idea if there's a way to add a tag en masse like that though, or if that's even a good idea.
joel56dt (2024-01-31 18:55:28+00:00): Check out the wiki page for mechanical edits: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits

A good start would be to post on the Canada subforum of the OpenStreetMap community site: https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/ca/95

I think the community would be supportive but I have never made a large edit like this so I don't know.
warmshowersmunich (2024-01-31 07:02:01+00:00): At the main street is only a sign. 
The guesthouse is at 20.29831° N, 101.64078° E. Off the street.
DD1GJ (2024-01-31 09:48:17+00:00): Revert aller heutigen Löschungen: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=146895947

Hallo Carlo, leider hast du bis jetzt nie auf Kommentare zu Deinen Änderungen/Löschungen reagiert. Der Weg war bereits mit einem Betretungsverbot gekennzeichnet und wir haben mit zahlreichen Nationalparks und Naturschutzbehörden Methoden entwickelt, solche kritischen Wege ohne Löschungen unsichtbar zu machen. Dies verhindert auch, dass diese Wege unbemerkt wieder neu angelegt werden.

Die OSM-Community nimmt den Naturschutz sehr ernst, erwartet aber auch, dass sich Behörden oder Interessensgruppen an die Spielregeln halten und sich klar zu erkennen geben, wie z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Nationalpark%20S%C3%A4chsische%20Schweiz
tux67 (2024-09-03 09:20:48+00:00): @DD1GJ - geht gerade wieder los ...
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146890491
Glassman (2024-01-31 19:45:01+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146890558
Sajeevini sivajothy (2024-06-23 07:29:59+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work, and it looks good.#OMGuru#OSMCha
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146890926
canfe (2024-01-31 07:29:58+00:00): Anche access=yes è errato.
Possono entrarci tutti ma proprio tutti anche merci pericolose.
Non tirare ad indovinare, usa la wiki.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146891107
eggie (2024-01-31 08:38:04+00:00): Hi 

What do you mean with becknified=true and providerId= bocshopify.humbhionline.in ?

Is this perhaps a shop=giftshop ?

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=146891498



Greetz,
eggie
Meenakshi01 (2024-01-31 09:02:38+00:00): Hi eggie; 
Greetings of the day!
We are working on a Proof of Concept for which we are showing shops on the application. These are tags which is mandatory to display on our application:  becknified=true and providerId= bocshopify.humbhionline.in 

If these will affect the location accuracy; please help us achieve this.
Taya_S (2024-01-31 09:21:24+00:00): Is this an actual physical store that you can visit? or is it purely online? OSM is not the place to add online stores.

OSM also is not the place to test your application. This is a live database.
Meenakshi01 (2024-01-31 10:07:23+00:00): Hi Thiskal,

Yes can understand, this is an actual store. 
We ensure to comply to OSM guidelines. 
Selected this as we need real store.
Woazboat (2024-01-31 10:52:53+00:00): Please don't add random tags that don't mean anything just because you need them for your app
marczoutendijk (2024-01-31 13:03:45+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15638
opendcc (2025-05-29 17:41:03+00:00): Hallo, vermutlich stimmen die Hausnummern nicht. Kannst Du das nochmal überprüfen?
map per (2024-02-01 20:51:33+00:00): Wegen review_requested:
Die Änderung sieht gut aus, danke!
voschix (2024-11-14 15:12:42+00:00): Hi airon90. On way 41213727 I changed  the value of the turn:lanes:backward key from straight|straight;right to through|through;right as indicated in the wiki. The problem was flagged by JOSM validation.
If was an oversight - no problem. But if this is due a discrepancy between JOSM and ID validation, we need to pursue this further.
airon90 (2024-11-14 17:59:56+00:00): Thank you very much for letting me know about this
pitfire (2024-01-31 12:01:59+00:00): Hallo Ra_colate ,

zu Deinem Änderungssatz: 146892602 mit der Beschreibung „Fixed inconsistent bridge or tunnel tagging #tomtom „

Deine Änderungen entsprechen nicht den realen Bedingungen in der Garagenanlage.
Das Parkhaus hat einen äußerst komplexe Trassenverlauf und ist derzeit weder in 2D noch
in Indoor Mapping  praxisnah darstellbar. 
Es ist nur Tunnel bist zur Einfahrt in den Garagenkomplex, danach lediglich eine routingfähiges Straßennetz zur Verbindung der Einbahnstraßen Ein und Ausfahrt und kein Tunnel! 
Gemäß den Regeln: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:tunnel?uselang=de
(Der Schlüssel tunnel=* wird für Straßen, Schienenwege, Kanäle, ... verwendet, die in einem Tunnel verlaufen. )

Für überdeckte Passagen, die zu einer Seite hin offen sind, oft Wege unterhalb eines Gebäudes, wird der Schlüssel covered=* anstelle von tunnel=* verwendet. 

Siehe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:covered?uselang=de
Die Zufahrt befindet sich, wie von mir erfasst, auf layer -1 und die Ausfahrt ist ebenerdig layer 0

MfG pitfire
Ra_colate (2024-02-02 07:06:30+00:00): Hi pitfire, thank you for your valuable feedback.  You have helped provide me with some clarity on these situations which I will follow in future similar scenarios.
Ra_colate (2024-02-02 07:06:33+00:00): Hi pitfire, thank you for your valuable feedback.  You have helped provide me with some clarity on these situations which I will follow in future similar scenarios.
Glassman (2024-02-02 20:49:11+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146892639
Glassman (2024-02-02 20:50:03+00:00): The better way to add a business to a building that holds more than one business is to just use nodes.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146893066
szjozsef (2024-04-18 05:33:55+00:00): Hello I have to revert your changes here.
Indeed there is a street naming anomaly, but It is wrong as you set.
a few steerts there has no name and one of the street changes the name on the middle (where the one way ends)
LakeTumba (2024-04-20 01:32:47+00:00): Thank you for providing insight and updating the streets!
eggie (2024-01-31 09:23:20+00:00): Dag Ken,
highway=construction construction=?  De specificatie ontbreekt. Wat doet die grote parkeerplaats daar en hoe zit het met de vorm van dat water.
Wegen die nog niet in het veld aanwezig zijn taggen we als highway=proposed proposed=.....

Kijk je nog even?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-01-31 09:35:56+00:00): Het water heb ik aangepast. De enorme parkeerplaats Poort van Heusden omgezet naar landuse=brownfield

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-01-31 09:36:15+00:00): Laatste sat foto https://www.satellietdataportaal.nl/?base=openstreetmap&res=0.3%2C0.5&datemin=31-01-2023&loc=51.69485%2C5.172029%2C17z&overlay=mos-0&marker=loc&acqdate=2024-01-18&acqid=20240118_110143_SVNEO-02&sensor=SuperView-NEO
Glassman (2024-02-02 20:50:23+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146893289
woodpeck (2024-01-31 10:56:32+00:00): Hallo Anonymus1715, bitte versuche doch, bei Deinen Beiträgen etwas sprechendere Kommentare als "Verschiedene Änderungen" zu verwenden - damit man auf einen Blick sieht, was Du gemacht hast. Was deine Edits and Landnutzungsgebieten betrifft, die sind etwas zu feingliedrig für OSM. Mini-Wiesen wie https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1244842678 sind übertrieben. Leider haben andere in diesem Teil Österreichs da in der Vergangenheit viel Murks gemacht mit über-detaillierten Landnutzungsflächen und es wird noch lange dauern, das wieder aufzuräumen - lass dich nicht davon verleiten. OSM ist kein Ausmalbuch für Grünflächen. Auch bei Gebäuden solltest Du es mit der "Genauigkeit" nicht übertreiben; https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/113253047 hast Du von einem rechteckigen Gebäude in ein 15-Eck verwandelt, ohne dass wirklich mehr Nutzen entstanden ist.
StVeit_Maps (2024-01-31 11:20:36+00:00): Hallo, 
Entschuldige falls ich dich jetzt falsch verstehe oder so aber wieso sollte eine Karte nicht genau sein? Das ist doch der Sinn darin. Zu dem Feld meiner Meinung nach ist ein Feld welches über 100m lang ist nicht gerade "Mini". Und zu dem Titel der änderung: Sollte ich wenn ich an über 50 Objekten Änderungen vornehme jedes Objekt einzeln in die info schreiben wenn man doch einfach nachschauen kann welche Änderungen ich vorgenommen habe.
Mammi71 (2024-01-31 11:50:54+00:00): Hallo Anonymus 1715, an der größe der meadow würd ich mich nicht stören. Aber wenn Du es schon so detailliert machst, dann würde ich mir sorgfältigeres Arbeiten wünschen: 
- keine Überlappungen von benachbarten landuses
- wenn meadow entlang eines Zaunes und mit diesem verbunden, dann bitte auch jeden Punkt vom Zaun mitnehmen (Tipp: Taste F folgt einer bereits vorhandenen Linie)
- Keine Flächen mit angrenzenden Straßen und Wegen "verkleben" (es sind bei Dir nur einzelne Punkte was auf unsauberes Arbeiten hindeutet)

Zur Genauigkeit der Gebäude beim oben verlinkte 15-Eck (ok, es hat nur 14 Ecken): nach meiner Einschätzung der zur Verfügung stehenden Luftbilder hast Du an der Südseite nun Terrassenfläche und eine ausgefahrene Markise in den Gebäudeumriss einbezogen - auch hier bitte sorgfältiger arbeiten und nicht einfach alles vom Luftbild abpinseln.
- wenn man dabei ist auch überlegen, ob die Ecken wirklich schiefwinklich sind oder ob man diese rechtwinklig macht - Tipp: Taste Q - entweder auf den gesamten Gebäudeumriss anwenden oder einzelne Ecken auswählen.
- Dieses Gebäude: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/143309946 ist für mich schwer vorstellbar, dass dieses 6 Ecken hat. Die Ecken am Dachfirst entstehen möglicherweise nur durch leichte perspektivische Verzerrung, oder nur das Dach hat diese seckseckige Form. Gebäudeumrisse sollten sich aber nicht am Dach, sondern am Grundriss orientieren. Und gerade in diesen Gegenden haben die Gebäude meist sehr ausladende Dächer, die deutlich über den Grundriss hinausgehen.

Ich halte Dir zugute, dass Du neu bist. Wir alle haben irgendwann mal angefangen und teilweise die gleichen Fehler gemacht. Nimm Dir bitte Ratschläge zu Herzen, die andere Mapper Dir geben werden.
Jakka (2024-01-31 09:41:29+00:00): de naamgeving lijkt eerder de plaatsnaam hoe is deze locatie benoemd door borden ? geen borden geen naam.
Glassman (2024-02-02 20:51:53+00:00): You also want to add layer=1 so service roads can be drawn through the roof. (assuming it is the roof over the gas pumps)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146893630
simo_explorer (2024-02-02 08:41:10+00:00): Hi schedul_xor
for a suspicious tag "buildings", I think every building should be tagged with building=yes
thanks for collaboration