piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
adlan2001 (2025-06-29 15:47:30+00:00): Hello wheelopoli,

I'm Adlan, just another OSMapper just like you. Right now I saw that you mentioned "PEGIS ePeta" in your changeset comment.

Can you verify if the data that PEGIS was used as their source is actually open data or open to be reused in other platform? Because I'm afraid that they're not stated clearly whether they are copyrighted and not available to be reused. Maybe you can clarify about this. 

Best regards,
Adlan.
ThatOneFilipinoExtremeist (2025-01-01 00:17:49+00:00): Keep up the good work! 

- Your Fellow Londoner,
ThatOneFilipinoExtremeist
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-17 09:10:38+00:00): Hello @Ali Bahoush
We have to register according to the sign. The sign here has not yet changed from a square to a crossroads.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-12-26 17:34:38+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1346115769

As feedback was requested on forums: is it actually having this name? Note that footways are often unnamed and this is fine
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-12-26 17:39:55+00:00): Also: motor_vehicle=no foot=yes is implied by highway=footway so not really needed in this case
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-12-26 17:41:32+00:00): And surface=mixed is not very useful - better to leave it empty, split way into parts of at least give more detail.

And thanks for mapping and asking for help if unsure! 

Have a happy mappy day!
Anonix35 (2024-12-30 16:54:11+00:00): Hi, why did you redesignate a drag-lift that I had just removed? In the Passo Del Lupo ski area ?
k127 (2024-12-31 16:05:55+00:00): Hi Anonix35!

I did not mean to offend you.

Let me try to explain:

For this changeset, I had been mapping from aerial imagery.

So, if you say that you "just removed" that drag lift, it would appear to every other mapper using similar aerial imagery like it had not been mapped before. (As I am currently mainly mapping power lines in this region, it would be a normal case that something is not yet mapped.)

So, almost naturally, we find conflicting information: "deleted because assuming outdated" versus "mapped again because of assuming previously unmapped". To avoid those, I tend to use lifecycle prefixes for tagging [1].

I am not quite sure about which drag-lift we are talking, and what my changes were. Maybe you could add a link?
I usually add `fixme` or `note` tags when things are unclear to me.

Is it this one? <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1346119158>

If so, and depending the reason why you had deleted the drag-lift from OSM, we could change its `aerialway` tag with right the life cycle prefix, so that other mappers know right away.

If the lift is disused: `disused:aerialway=drag_lift`, or if it is razed: `razed:aerialway=drag_lift`, etc.

Let me know what's the state of the lift, then I'll fix the tag!


Best,

k127


[1] <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix#Stages_of_decay>
Anonix35 (2024-12-31 16:18:00+00:00): Hi K127,

Yes it's the drag-lift you mentioned. 
It was demolished 2-3 years ago (I don't have the exact date) and was replaced by the chairlift that crosses its line.
And indeed, if you just look at satellite images, it still appears on some of them.
Coincidentally, I had only made changes a week or two ago.

So I'll let you make the correction if you want to add information to avoid other similar problems ? (razed:aerialway=drag_lift)

Also for information, a magic-carpet does not have an aerialway=station at its ends.
It is not technically considered a ski lift and does not have an arrival or departure station.

Anonix
k127 (2024-12-31 17:01:57+00:00): Great! The aerialway is now prefixed: the way has `razed:`.

Regarding the four aerial imagery sources reviewed for the edit, a construction phase of the new aerialway was clearly reasonable, also the discard of the old one, supported by the narrowing cutline.

Now, on the most recent imagery (as of now, MapBox satellite appears to be the one), there are still pylons. So I prefixed them with `disused:`, while I do not know about both the age of the imagery and the recent state of the pylons. Are they gone?

Thanks for letting me know about the magic carpet lift. That should now also be fixed. Initially, I didn't know such details you mentioned, as that does not belong to my particular interests, but erroneously applied changes based on a more general knowledge.

<https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160840611>

<https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160840856>

ps: For JOSM users, the "Start Data preset" could also be helpful for adding data such as construction and building dates, maybe relevant for some data users: <https://github.com/Sowa1980/Start_Data_preset>
Anonix35 (2024-12-31 17:08:36+00:00): Perfect, thank you !

I can't say whether the pylons have been completely dismantled. So what you did is good.

Have a nice New Year’s Eve
k127 (2024-12-31 17:12:32+00:00): Thanks! To you, too!
Filip009 (2024-12-28 14:03:55+00:00): Zdravím, už som vám minule písal, že vrcholy sú presne zamerané v najvyššom bode podľa DMR. Nepresúvajte ich! Pokiaľ máte iný názor, predtým než budete upravovať ďalšie napíšte aj vy komentár pod túto sadu zmien komentár.
HellMap (2024-12-26 18:21:51+00:00): Sveiki,

Vai varētu precizēt, kas tieši šajā krustojumā mainījies? Šajā izmaiņā ir noņemts savienojums no https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/76075410 uz https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/177032989 . Vai šeit ir pārbūvēts? 

Lūgums šādām būtiskām izmaiņām pielikt aprakstu, jo "labojumi" nepalīdz šo saprast.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2024-12-25 15:18:41+00:00): This is indeed a long crossing, alongside a parking lot. Vehicles can cross anywhere along this segment. I fixed it. Thanks!
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2024-12-26 11:35:15+00:00): This crossing was correct. Reverted back.
JesseFTW (2024-12-28 03:28:41+00:00): I'm concerned that you didn't verify this on the ground, since you made these changesets around the same time you were making changesets thousands of miles away. 

StreetComplete should only be used for places you have physically been.
okainov (2025-01-19 13:02:00+00:00): Hi!

Could you please explain the reason for this change? I've explicitly removed "access=private" from some roads because they are not private and accessible by general public (even though being close to military zone).
SomeoneElse (2025-01-21 02:01:05+00:00): For info, there's a discussion at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mass-edits-by-digitalegypt-not-aligned-with-reality/124533 .  It'd be great if you could comment there.
salma_ayman (2025-01-21 08:49:06+00:00): Hello Okainov,
Thank you for reaching out.
I added the access tag based on my understanding of the military area's restrictions for public access. I appreciate your clarification regarding the comment and your efforts to review and remove tags as needed.
However, I would like to kindly request the removal of the access tag from the following links to ensure that the route through these ways remains open:
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1109212744
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1109212743
Additionally, I request the same for the segments between these nodes:
Node 4992986574 - Node 4992986573
Node 9603811039 - Node 9603811040
Node 2006375898 - Node 9603811043
Thank you for your time and assistance in resolving this matter.
Best regards,
Salma Ayman
okainov (2025-01-21 09:03:10+00:00): I've updated the indicated roads as well, thanks.
Kees 59 (2024-12-25 14:11:34+00:00): Looks like node 12450713898 creates the large changeset area. Possibly added by mistake? It has no tags and sits somewhere in the middle of a field in Germany.
ruph (2025-01-01 12:41:05+00:00): Thank you for your feedback. The error was unintentional, and I have accordingly removed point 12450713898.
Xre90 (2025-08-09 19:21:35+00:00): Moin, bei deinen Bushaltestellen ist ein Fehler im Tag: "network 	network=VLP" 

Anstatt bei network: "network=VLP" wäre bei network "Verkehrsverbund Westmecklenburg" das richtige, da es sich bei network um Verkehrsverbünde handelt (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:network) 

Die VLP kannst du in folgendem Tag unterbringen:
"operator:short=VLP"

operator wäre für den vollen Namen, d.h. "operator=Verkehrsgesellschaft Ludwigslust-Parchim mbH" 

Beste Grüße
38446 (2025-01-16 07:29:54+00:00): Hi, is the name of the forest in the large multipolygon relation 7558014 really "vv"?
jorchr (2025-01-16 08:18:19+00:00): I am adding swamps and wetlands to southern Sweden. In order to make bindings to the correct multipolygon in the iD editor, I have to name the polygons temporarily. When I am finished, I remove the name again.
APneunzehn74 (2025-01-16 07:23:33+00:00): Hallo, kurze Info. In diesem Chargenset hast du einzelne Parkplatz Stellflächen eingetragen. Um die einzelnen Stellplätze sollte bitte ein gesamtes amenity=parking gezogen werden. Am besten mit dem richtigen parking typ. Also ebenerdig, Straßenrand usw. 
Grüße und danke für deine Mithilfe bei OSM
APneunzehn74 (2025-01-16 07:25:32+00:00): Weitere Infos gibt's im Wiki 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dparking_space
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dparking
LordGarySugar (2025-06-17 21:43:48+00:00): Just a note - if a long footpath has multiple surfaces you should split the way, I corrected a footpath here that was tagged with surface=asphalt when in fact the entire length from Pie Gardens to Delmer End Lane was mostly dirt and grass.
mavl (2025-02-05 14:03:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162167075 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted. Reason: wrong values for name:en - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161608012].
os-emmer (2025-04-27 20:21:05+00:00): Hello Spring Dream,
you added a lot of elements with street=yrs here, see https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/235B. What are they? It looks like most of them yhould be building=yes. Could you check that?
Fizzie-DWG (2025-01-27 02:32:51+00:00): DWG revert - Google Maps used as Source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161801825
infeeeee (2024-12-29 22:08:33+00:00): Szia! Üdv az OpenStreetMapen!

Ezen a házon a building:flats azt jelenti, hogy összesen 3 darab lakás van abban a házban: https://osm.org/way/340141894 Biztos ezt akartad jelölni? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:flats

Másik, ez a 6-os szám A-B-C része a címzésnek, nem csak a lépcsőház jele? 

Ha kérdésed merülne fel, a magyar szerkesztő közösség elérhetőségeit megtalálod ezen az oldalon: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hungary/Közösség

További jó térképezést!
Peredice (2024-12-31 11:05:30+00:00): Szia!

Köszi hogy felhívtad rá a figyelmem, a 10-es számú társasházban valóban 3 lakás van, azt rosszul jelöltem és nemsokára ki is javítom.

De, a 6-os szám alatt azok csak a lépcsőház jelzések. azokat is mindjárt javítom.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-01-27 02:32:46+00:00): DWG revert - Google Maps used as Source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161801823
mavl (2025-05-13 15:08:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
eggie (2024-12-25 09:59:31+00:00): Dag Jeroen,

Je hebt hier alleen maar adresnode Bouwdriest 30 naar de straat gesleept?
Die kan beter weer terug naar het juiste pand.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=160596989

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-12-25 10:01:28+00:00): Adresnode hersteld
eggie (2024-12-25 10:06:06+00:00): Dag Jeroen,

Dit hele stuk zal toch niet gesloten zijn voor motorvoertuigen. 
Daar horen brommers trouwens ook bij.
Dit waren je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=160597021

Je zult dus het stukje tussen de paaltjes moeten afsplitsen en dan 
highway=cycleway
met
moped=designated, mofa=designated, traffic_sign=NL:G12a
Ik haal motor_vehicle=no weer weg.
Dat kan nooit goed zijn.  

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-12-25 10:17:59+00:00): Hier vind je vast wel hoe je iets moet splitsen.
https://learnosm.org/nl_NL/beginner/id-editor/#basisbewerkingen-met-id

Als je op met de linker muisknop op een individueel punt (node) op de lijn klikt en klikt ofwel met de rechter muisknop of met de spatiebalk om het contextmenu te activeren, krijg je een menu.
eggie (2024-12-25 10:59:46+00:00): Het is nu een G12a fietspad.
CTRL F5 voor het effect
Aleksandar Matejevic (2024-12-26 10:53:39+00:00): Hi Hassan Arara, 
I have seen that you have added Assoungaha as admin_level=4. Can you explain me this because on the available resources it states that Assoungaha is a subregion of Ouaddai, not a separate region.
mavl (2025-05-13 15:03:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
Fizzie-DWG (2025-01-27 02:31:50+00:00): DWG revert - Google Maps used as Source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161801811
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2024-12-25 20:56:02+00:00): Hi, 
surface=ground 
gives more information than
surface=unpaved

unpaved and paved values are very general ones.

Was surface=ground incorrect?
Taya_S (2024-12-25 10:35:55+00:00): Hello, I have reverted this changeset. The buildings you created are in no way present on the ground. Please only use the building tag for individual buildings

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160598587
ivanbranco (2024-12-27 10:05:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160627545

You added natural=water to a protected area park
lmagreault (2025-01-07 08:23:23+00:00): Waouh, y'a de la vie dans les cimetières. Beau boulot !
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160598417
Branko Kokanovic (2024-12-27 20:31:24+00:00): nemoj da dodajes Laze Nancica 51a-l (npr. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12450893353) jer se user zap93 buni i brise ih, evo diskusija ovde: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154430164
Branko Kokanovic (2024-12-27 20:32:05+00:00): mozda nekad odem da "izvidim", ali treba do daljnjeg da verujemo zap93
vlaristic (2024-12-27 20:42:10+00:00): Ok, važi. Tek sad sam video diskusiju.
eggie (2024-12-25 12:54:47+00:00): Dag Pieter... 
Je vraagt feedback.. 
Lijkt me oke.
MVG
eggie
felipeeugenio (2024-12-25 12:09:17+00:00): eliminado lago inexistente.
d3mol3k (2024-12-25 16:23:49+00:00): Nie łaczymy parkingow z dogami dojazdowymi
pitscheplatsch (2025-01-05 15:28:55+00:00): Revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160536061

Thanks.
queenofthenightosphere (2024-12-30 07:50:22+00:00): Thanks for the typo fix!
ChrissW-R1 (2025-01-02 00:28:49+00:00): You're welcome @queenofthenightosphere
gscholz (2024-12-28 10:14:45+00:00): Hi Xevi,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=2.60212&lat=42.00993&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=160600600

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Xevi (2024-12-28 18:55:00+00:00): Thank you for the advice. I fixed ti
gscholz (2024-12-29 09:45:52+00:00): Thanks for your quick response.
Guido
BCNorwich (2024-12-30 19:30:24+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've tagged the driveway as per OSM practice. I've added the building and tagged that with the name etc. Please make any corrections necessary. Need help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-01-27 02:31:44+00:00): DWG revert - Google Maps used as Source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161801808
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-12-25 19:14:17+00:00): ale po co łączyć te parkingi z drogami?
AnnaWilk (2024-12-25 20:53:07+00:00): Przepraszam, nie wiedziałam że tak się nie robi. Na szczęście ktoś to poprawił i już tak nie będę robiła.
johsin18 (2024-12-28 16:42:51+00:00): Hmm, die Hausnummern waren doch schon einzeln eingetragen an den Eingängen oder?
floeschen (2025-01-24 11:23:31+00:00): Ja, stimmt. Sorry, StreetComplete hat gefragt und ich nicht überprüft. Kann von mir aus rückgängig gemacht werden.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-12-25 12:35:32+00:00): undiscussed import reverted https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160602193
VLD549 (2025-01-16 16:56:11+00:00): Hi, I was asked to verify name changes. Could you provide a link of some sort that shows it to be Hassinkweg? I can't seem to find it.

Thank you, much appreciated!
stillhart (2024-12-25 14:06:32+00:00): ♥️
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-12-25 13:14:28+00:00): reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160603359
VLD549 (2025-01-15 15:34:44+00:00): Hi, I can't find Linnaeuslaantje. I tried Vliegerpad a bit to the West, nowhere to be found.
I was asked to verify name changes. Could you provide a link of some sort? Perhaps a picture?

Thank you in advance!
Marco Nell (2025-01-16 19:18:49+00:00): Hi VLD549,

Welcome to our Vliegerpark!
I am one of the volunteers who maintain the park.

The 'Linneauslaantje' is one of the main paths.
The main paths (Vliegerpad, Mario Kramerpad, Beukenlaan, Linneauslaantje) have a sand surface. The other paths are at the moment more or less muddy clay.
The 'Linneauslaantje runs east-west and is only approx. 100 metres long.
Signpost is missing.
Hope this helps, because it is quite a maze!

Kind regards, Marco
VLD549 (2025-03-14 15:03:14+00:00): Thank you!
NorthCrab_upload (2024-12-25 13:20:52+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1346160748

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
silversurfer83 (2024-12-25 18:26:26+00:00): Hello there :)

if this seems to be an office now, why didn't you change the node to office then? If the place is still being used it shouldn't be deleted, should it?

cheers
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160603558
CurlingMan13 (2024-12-26 00:33:47+00:00): Changeset reverted.  We use access tags to denote whether they are public or not.  I can clearly see the roads from aerial imagery, so they should be mapped.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160620247
eggie (2024-12-25 14:10:11+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback De wegklasse toegangsweg heb ik teruggezet. Het is geen openbare weg. 
De officiële  straatnaam zal niet Toegangsweg NS zijn. Ik het name omgezet naar description. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Famlam (2025-04-19 11:42:02+00:00): Dag Daan, ik was ook benieuwd waar de naam REP1 voor een spoorlijn vandaan komt. Heb je hier een bron voor?
user_5359 (2025-11-05 08:29:17+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1346162876. What is the mean of the tags
GM_TYPE = Misc. Manmade Structure
LAYER = Misc. Manmade Structure
id = -3908
?
Joao0409 (2025-01-01 16:19:24+00:00): Bonjour, pourtant sur le site des adresses du gouvernement, l'Avenue en question se trouve sur une partie de la Montée du Commandant Robien, le long de l'autoroute
https://adresse.data.gouv.fr/base-adresse-nationale/13211_5708#17.18/43.289557/5.491988
FrançoiseR (2025-01-07 16:55:39+00:00): Bonsoir, bonne année. De toute évidence il y a eu erreur dans la soumission à la base adresse (qui donne aussi des localisation approximatives dans le quartier des Crottes pour une série de voies récentes ou en chantier). Il aurait été étonnant qu'une seule portion au milieu de la Montée du Commandant Robien ait été renommé... sauf exception (l'ex rue Alexandre Ansaldi débaptisée lors du dernier conseil municipal) les nouveaux noms sont attribués à des voies nouvelles ou à des voies sans nom ce qui est le cas de l'avenue Marie Deluil-Martigny qui est d’ailleurs déjà au  cadastre là ou je l'ai taguée).
Joao0409 (2025-01-07 18:17:37+00:00): Bonsoir et bonne année. Merci pour ces précisions et d'avoir pris la peine de me répondre.
WoSoe (2024-12-26 05:38:29+00:00): Moin,
unter der A3 ist weiterhin ein seperater Fußweg vorhanden. Dieser wurde extra um ein paar Zentimeter erweitert und wurde zusätzlich mit Zeichen 239 gekennzeichnet.
Füßgänger brauchen nicht auf die Straße ausweichen.
bueffeltaler (2024-12-27 16:48:07+00:00): Hallo WoSoe, danke für die Anmerkung. In der Unterführung entlang der Staatsstraße ist weiterhin ein Gehweg vorhanden. "Sidewalk=left". Fußgänger müssen nicht auf die Straße ausweichen, Radfahrer schon, oder sie müssen ihr Rad schieben. Auch ist nur eine einzige Unterführung vorhanden, vor und nach der Unterführung sieht es anders aus, hier ist der Geh- und Radweg nicht an die Staatsstraße "angeflanscht" sondern eigenständig. Das Tagging sollte in Ordnung sein, auch wenn es auf den ersten Blick nicht so erscheint. Gruß bueffeltaler
WoSoe (2024-12-28 05:47:23+00:00): Servus bueffeltaler,
an der Straße unter der Brücke ist »sidewalk:left=separate« eingetragen. Das bedeutet, es ist ein eigenständiger Fußweg eingetragen, was jetzt nicht mehr stimmt.
Siehe hier:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:sidewalk%3Dseparate

Östlich der Unterführung ist an der Straße »sidewalk=left« gemappt, was unnötig/falsch ist, weil ja eine extra Weg existiert. Da wäre »sidewalk:left=separate« angebracht.

Gruß WoSoe
𒂼𒄄　 (2024-12-25 20:47:34+00:00): رجاءا لا تقم باضافة نقاط كهذه فهي تعتبر سبام.
literan (2024-12-25 17:44:05+00:00): и зачем вы их порезали? склеил обратно
eggie (2024-12-25 14:28:15+00:00): Beste Maasland Probeer concreet aan te geven wat je aan het doen bent.
Probeer ook water en landuse netjes te scheiden. 
Best lastig om te zien hoe de oever loopt. Ik gebruik dan een transparant van de BGT. Alles is immers ingemeten in Nederland. 
MVG
eggie
𒂼𒄄　 (2024-12-25 20:44:09+00:00): لماذا حذفت اسم المتجر؟
Tjuro (2024-12-31 16:38:37+00:00): Beste ArjanJager,

Ik zie dat je hier access=no hebt toegevoegd, access=no is in principe alleen bedoeld voor militaire terreinen, of vergelijkbaar, als er een bord verboden toegang staat en of het is duidelijk dat verder het terrein niet openbaar toegankelijk is dan bijvoorbeeld met een hek dan kan access=private gemapped worden.

Als een weg over een erf gaat betekend dit niet direct iets over de toegang.

Met vriendelijke groet,

Tjuro
Fizzie-DWG (2025-01-27 02:31:39+00:00): DWG revert - Google Maps used as Source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161801807
silversurfer83 (2024-12-25 20:07:59+00:00): Moin

das hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1346170353 dürfte ein man_made=storage_tank + content=slurry sein. Ein silo ist idR geschlossen (außer bunker_silo). Alternativ ginge noch building=slurry_tank, wenngleich ich davon mittlerweile abrate, da ein Güllepot kein Gebäude im Sinne von OSM ist.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160606121
lberges (2024-12-26 02:09:48+00:00): Gülle und SIlo schließt sich nicht aus: vgl. https://www.kohliag.ch/de/produkte/lagern/guellesilos
silversurfer83 (2024-12-26 07:04:49+00:00): Gestern hab ich erst wieder festgestellt, dass Schweizer und Deutsche unterschiedliche Vokabeln für die gleiche Sache nutzen.

Du bist (mal wieder) der Einzige, der meint, dass etwas, für dass es schon zwei lange eingeführte tagvarianten (s.o.) gibt, mit einer dritten Variante taggen zu müssen.

Diese Pötte (ob aus Stahl oder Beton) werden bei OSM nicht als Silo erfasst und da ändert auch ein schweizer Hersteller nix dran.
lberges (2024-12-26 10:06:01+00:00): Hab gar nicht bemerkt, dass das ein Schweizer Hersteller ist. Für Dich ein weiterer Link: https://www.stallkamp.de/produkte/edelstahl-behaelter
lberges (2024-12-26 10:07:01+00:00): Und: https://www.lipp-system.de/systemloesungen/landwirtschaft/guelle/