piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
orthocircular (2024-03-01 19:46:45+00:00): No problem at all! I'm based in Salem and always happy to help or chat, I'm also in the OSM US Slack and OSM World Discord chat channels.
kyle_tyler (2024-03-01 20:24:58+00:00): Oh cool, I'll have to join those groups, thanks. 

Looking forward to mapping more! If you see me do anything too egregious feel free to let me know.
Emilius123 (2024-02-26 23:28:24+00:00): Gaming
tekim (2024-03-04 01:08:07+00:00): Thanks for the edits.  I don't think there are any cycleway buffers on that section of Ziegler Road unless the road has been reworked in the last few months.
kechan (2024-02-26 23:40:55+00:00): the names came from the albany county gis map
Vinber-Pro (2024-02-28 07:41:25+00:00): Bonjour,
je viens de voir passer votre modification. J'ai du mal à comprendre et votre commentaire n'est pas explicite.

Vous mettez en old_name un name qui n'était pas là avant https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/54151922

le nom précédent était déja faux ?

à bientôt
chabe01 (2024-02-29 14:47:16+00:00): Bonjour,

L'ancien nom n'était pas correct selon les informations sur place
NorthCrab_upload (2024-02-27 00:20:57+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8721059546
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/196655436

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
G_P_J (2024-03-04 14:47:31+00:00): Poprawione.
ForestFurnace (2024-02-27 03:42:54+00:00): *Abraham Lincoln Park, not Ellison Park
Xvtn (2024-02-27 18:42:16+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes here. Looks good to me! In my mind, there is some ambiguity between "no" and "private" for access-type tags, but I think "no" makes sense here. Thanks for your contribution!
SeanAtSparelabs (2024-02-27 18:49:57+00:00): Thanks Xvtn
Glassman (2024-02-28 17:44:42+00:00): It appears that someone reverted your edit. Since the driveway exists, it can be mapped. They did add your address to the house. Let me know if this is not correct. I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
SageHenDad (2024-02-28 19:25:41+00:00): All I want and need is to make it so that OSM doesn’t route to my house via Quail Lane. There is a wall between Quail and the house. The only access to my house is from 114th Ave W.
jeremy77 (2024-02-28 16:10:31+00:00): I do not understand this change. The Victoria AAA network is mapped and named colloquial by users and the city as per the City of Victoria's AAA map. https://www.victoria.ca/media/file/aaa-network-map your edits have made it harder to use the maps and removed useful names.
CoreyBurger (2024-02-28 16:16:43+00:00): They are not officially signed routes on the street, hence why I think they don't make sense. Unlike the Goose, Lochside & E&N, you cannot go to the street and find signs that say "Oaklands Connector" or "Pandora St bikeway"
CoreyBurger (2024-02-28 16:17:53+00:00): Cycle routes says this: Cycle routes or bicycle route are named or numbered or otherwise signed routes" from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cycle_routes
The city only named them temporarily for planning purposes
jeremy77 (2024-02-28 16:25:12+00:00): The city continues to publish maps with these names, as I posted above. I can't speak for all the routes but many are signed with 'Bike Route' signs that point along the route and help with way-finding in addition to way finding sharrows (and street name signs obviously). Your edits seems anti-cyclist by making it harder to find good routes for no good reason.
CoreyBurger (2024-02-28 16:28:50+00:00): The city's published map does not break out individual routes, they are all coloured the same. The city actually removed the map that showed the different routes. And yes, some of them have the older Bicycle Route sign, but most of those predate the AAA creation, and none name the route ala the Regional Trails
jeremy77 (2024-02-28 16:43:49+00:00): The map after your edits is worse for anyone trying to find a safe way to cycle in the city and I think that should be the primary goal here. Give useful names and highlight good 'routes' that are safe and comfortable to ride on. You undid a lot of good work, please consider reverting it back to the way it was a few days ago.
CoreyBurger (2024-02-28 16:48:50+00:00): The routing engines use infrastructure tags (which need a bunch of work, about to start on that) and the relations are less important than the infrastructure.
jeremy77 (2024-02-28 19:44:44+00:00): You can add tags without removing relationships. The map looks so much worse now. This is for cyclists not drivers having cycling infrastructure mapped well doesn't get in the way or anything please undo what you did.
CoreyBurger (2024-02-28 20:12:03+00:00): I'll finish the AAA cycling route relation today or tomorrow so the map shows them as "routes" again
daniilprohorov (2024-02-27 01:37:34+00:00): На самом деле, логику шлагбаума понять сложно, но обычно или он закрыт, или ворота, поэтому я его оставил закрытым.
Константин Гам (2024-03-19 09:37:57+00:00): Добрый день!
У вас двор правда истыкан знаками движение на велосипеде разрешено? Маловероятно. Не ставьте bicycle=yes и foot=yes на highway=footway, если таковых нет на местности
Константин Гам (2024-03-19 09:39:49+00:00): bicycle=yes поставленный на калитку не означает что туда реально физически с велосипедом зайти, а обозначает что ПРОЕЗД на велосипеде без остановок разрешён всем. 
Пожалуйста не используйте этот тег, если нет административного разрешения проезда для всех.
arjunaraoc (2024-03-07 08:59:13+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147954483
lasagna (2024-03-03 03:59:27+00:00): I'm glad that you are continuing to improve the OpenStreetMap data.
The bike lanes on Brannan Street have no physical separation from the car lanes. Following standard mapping practices, we don't add them as separate ways.
Please remove the way you added ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1255099834 ) and any other cycleways you added that are just bike lanes.
Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle and follow the suggestions there.
pbsurf (2024-03-14 07:45:07+00:00): I second this - please remove these separate ways added for bike lanes.
Ewen Hill (2024-02-27 11:06:08+00:00): Hi ColabOnline - re your review request. Everything looks good in your edit apart from the description and potential the image. The description is not an invite to advertise and the image I don't think will render anywhere. I hope this helps and I have removed these.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147955219
felipeeugenio (2024-02-27 12:57:20+00:00): Hello.
What is your source for all this changes?

And please write with normal capitalization.

regards
ForestFurnace (2024-09-27 22:05:14+00:00): *used NYSDOP imagery, not PEMA.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-03-14 01:51:59+00:00): Reverted by DWG - apparent undiscussed OEG Import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163594030
PcMouse1 (2024-03-27 04:59:11+00:00): Hi SF_Ryota, was this area surveyed prior to mapping? Features on the ground do not seem to match the custom imagery you used.
okadatsuneo_import (2024-03-27 05:59:49+00:00): Hello PcMouse1,
The "highway=tertiary" was tagged to the way of the wood area. So, I deleted wrong tag on the changeset #149205079.
Supaplex (2024-02-27 09:42:18+00:00): Hi, it seems you are adding stuffs in the sea. Are you sure these things you add exist in the reality? If not it should not be uploaded
impiaaa (2024-02-27 18:28:15+00:00): Hi, individual trees should only be mapped with natural=tree on nodes, not natural=wood areas. The latter is only for forests.
Ewen Hill (2024-03-01 08:57:03+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM - This a appears to be a private road and the road should be set to access=private if you could do this please.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147956085
Ewen Hill (2024-03-01 08:56:41+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM - This a appears to be a private road and the road should be set to access=private if you could do this please.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147956098
Ewen Hill (2024-03-01 08:56:28+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM - This a appears to be a private road and the road should be set to access=private if you could do this please due to the biosecurity risk
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147956122
Ewen Hill (2024-03-01 08:55:49+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM - This a appears to be a private road and the road should be set to access=private if you could do this please due to biosecurity risks
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147956133
Ewen Hill (2024-03-01 08:55:02+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM - This a appears to be a private road and the road should be set to access=private if you could do this please as there is a biosecurity risk here.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147956158
Ewen Hill (2024-03-01 08:54:33+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM - This a appears to be a private road and the road should be set to access=private if you could do this please.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147956222
Ewen Hill (2024-03-01 08:54:11+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM - This a appears to be a private road and the road should be set to access=private if you could do this please.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147956246
Ewen Hill (2024-03-01 08:53:58+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM - This a appears to be a private road and the road should be set to access=private if you could do this please.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147956269
woodpeck (2024-02-27 09:47:08+00:00): Dear user Evlyn, I have reverted your deletion of tracks in this changeset. While land owners can determine where people may go, they cannot dictate what is shown on OpenStreetMap. If you, as a representative of the land owner, have disallowed access on these paths (and signposted this accordingly) then the paths can be marked "access=private" or "access=no" in OpenStreetMap to ensure that everyone knows that these paths, while existing on the ground, may not be used. Deleting a track from OSM that exists on the ground is considered vandalism.
OddBunsen (2024-02-27 15:13:05+00:00): Is that how you're supposed to do this? I think the turn restrictions are on the intersection and not as a relation, but I'm not sure.
rhtb0 (2024-02-27 08:50:26+00:00): 왜 곤지암JC로 통합하나요? 환경영향평가에서 곤지암JC와 진우JC하고 따로 나와있습니다.
◪ Jarv (2024-02-28 00:56:10+00:00): Hi RustySnoot.

Imma revert this change as there are no prohibitions on pedestrians on the roads which you've changed to foot=no
There is a pedestrian prohibition on the M23 J11 gyratory & link to services, but that's it within the areas which you've changed
RustySnoot (2024-02-28 10:42:44+00:00): Ah, my apologies! I likely got confused and thought the pedestrian prohibition applied to more spaces than it did. Thank you for sorting that out. :) 

Cheers,

Rusty
hoserab (2024-02-27 19:20:34+00:00): Don't be too hard on people: in fairness, putting traffic signals at every crossing of the road ways is an acceptable way of doing it. ;)

I would tend to do it the way you've done it though, it's a lot simpler and more reflective of reality in my opinion!
Kovoschiz (2024-02-27 06:27:38+00:00): 1. Please don't spam hashtags. `description=` is not for advertising. I can very seriously explore the coverage with `service_area=` but it needs to be geographical. 
2. `wikidata=` and `wikipedia=` are only used for the unique entity. `brand:wikidata=` and `brand:wikipedia=` has already been added. 
3. `branch=` is for the branch name only. `brand=` already covers the other part.
CorruptComputer (2024-02-27 05:12:23+00:00): Apologies for the changeset bounding box being large, looks like it was because of this crossing I added with the railway: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11668360335
TrickyFoxy (2024-03-01 11:40:14+00:00): Нельзя опираться на яндекс

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148092768
rhtb0 (2024-02-27 09:10:22+00:00): 안녕하세요 오픈스트리트맵에 오신걸 환영합니다.
편집하신 계양강화고속도로는 추진 단계에만 있는 고속도로로 빨라도 2032년에야 개통할 계획입니다. 삽도 뜨지 못한 상태로 그냥 고속도로 태그를 붙이면 이미 개통한 상태로 나와서 혼란을 줄 수 있습니다. 아직 삽도 뜨지 못하거나 계획 중인 고속도로에 쓰이는 태그가 "proposed"라는 태그를 사용합니다. 착공식 등 실제 삽을 뜬 경우에는 "construction "을 씁니다.
rhtb0 (2024-02-27 09:13:24+00:00): 또한 access=no는 실질 개통 이후 통제 상황에만 사용하는 것입니다. 번호조차 아직 확실치 않으며 서해안고속도로의 연장 격으로 봐야 할지 아직 판단하기에는 너무 빠릅니다. 서해안고속도로로 봐도 이름에 (계양-강화)같은 괄호같은 부가 정보는 사용하지 않습니다.
rhtb0 (2024-02-27 09:14:35+00:00): JC나 IC의 이름은 도로에 적는 것이 아닌 개통 후 고속도로 분기점/출구 태그를 사용해서 나타냅니다.
aq123 (2024-02-28 06:19:30+00:00): Добрый день!
Кроме номера дома хорошо бы ещё улицу(как она называется на карте) и город добавить. Без этого могут быть проблемы с поиском здания по адресу.
В качестве примера:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/214610891
berndw (2024-03-01 08:36:03+00:00): Hallo, 

willkommen bei OpenStreetMap und vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag zu den Daten.

Ich habe aber eine Bitte bezüglich der Changesetkommentare, diese sollen anzeigen, was gemacht wurde. Unten ein paar Beispiele, ansonsten weiterhin viel Spaß beim Mappen.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
Nakaner (2024-02-27 17:04:46+00:00): Hallo,

Blitzer werden als Nodes erfasst, wo der Apparat steht. Die Standorte neben der Fahrbahn waren schon richtig. Die Zuordnung zu den Fahrtrichtungen erfolgt durch Enforcement-Relationen, die auch dort schon erfasst waren.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1443121 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6192992 sind die beiden Relationen.

Relationen als Objekt im OSM-Datenmodell sind unter https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Relationen erläutert.

Ich habe deine Änderungen am Blitzer an der B 9 bei Langenberg daher rückgängig gemacht.

Viele Grüße

Michael
airdace (2024-02-27 10:37:12+00:00): Az úton normál kerékpársáv van, ennek a címkéje cycleway=lane. Javítottam. Sajnos a StreetComplete elég rosszul teljesít kerékpáros elemeket tekintve... (én csak manuálisan szerkesztek, az OSM Wiki szabályai alapján)
balint36 (2024-02-27 10:52:13+00:00): Nem nagyon látom, hogy mi volt a hiba. Buszból csak az egyik oldalra láttam rá, ott megfelelően jelölte, a másik oldalt meg megtartotta annak, ami eddig is volt.
airdace (2024-02-27 10:54:40+00:00): Ja értem akkor. Mindkét oldalon kerékpársávot festettek fel, én ezt láttam és jelöltem. Akkor rendben.
dreua (2024-02-28 14:37:52+00:00): Hallo, willkommen und danke für deine Beiträge zur OpenStreetMap!
Alles was ich mir angeschaut habe sieht schon sehr schön aus, nur zu der Parkfläche hier hätte ich Verbesserungsvorschläge: Zum einen könnte man die Tags etwas spezifischer setzen: Das hier ist ja kein großer Parkplatz sondern nur ein paar Stellplätze am Straßenrand, dafür gibts einen eigenen Tag. Guck mal etwas weiter westlich in der Nackstraße, da gibt es schon ganz ähnliche Stellflächen. (Oder im Wiki, aber lass dich von dem Artikel nicht erschlagen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:parking%3Dstreet_side)
Des Weiteren fände ich gut, wenn wir die Parkflächen, so man sie denn eintragen möchte, auch möglichst exakt eintragen. Über das "Background Settings" Menü rechts im iD editor hast du die Möglichkeit verschiedene Quellen für Luftbilder auszuwählen, hier ist meist "Mainz latest aerial imagery" das Beste. Ich fände hier also gut, wenn die Unterbrechungen durch Bäume und und querende Straßen auch entsprechend berücksichtigt werden.

Schreib gerne hier oder per PN falls du fragen hast. Möchtest du einen Einladungslink für die Mainzer Telegram-Gruppe?

Vor allem wünsche ich dir aber viel Spaß beim Mappen!

Lg David
dreua (2024-03-18 16:34:37+00:00): Ich hab das hier für den Abschnitt der Nackstraße mal erledigt.
eggie (2024-02-27 07:26:19+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback  Meestal zijn tweewielers uitgezonderd van oneway=yes.
Is dat hier het geval?
Dan toevoegen oneway:bicycle=no  en evt ook voor mofa en moped.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-02-27 07:33:08+00:00): https://www.mapillary.com/app/?z=17&lat=52.0829885127&lng=5.0351057947&pKey=582754832690652&focus=photo&x=0.29615820433821977&y=0.5229850298666538&zoom=2.2752808988764044

en

https://smoothefiets.ddns.net/html/verkeersbordenkaart/index.php?lat=52.082644444&lng=5.035989583&z=19

Dus toevoegen zie boven..   Dan zal het weer correct routeren.
iRubens (2024-02-27 07:55:34+00:00): Hallo Eggie,

Ik heb zonet een update gemaakt om fietsers in beide richtingen toe te staan.
MxxCon (2024-02-28 02:10:27+00:00): Hello.
What is the reason for setting this height tag? This road segment is not passing under anything..
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147959692
gadipeh (2024-02-28 12:48:22+00:00): Hi MxxCon,

Thank you for reviewing the edits and making the necessary changes. We apologize for the error made by our editor. Moving forward, we will take extra care to avoid such mistakes. Thank you for your support.

Regards,
gadipeh
berndw (2024-02-27 11:48:40+00:00): Vielleicht wäre es besser gewesen, die Brücke und die Wege mit life_cycle prefix auszublenden, anstelle einer Löschung.

Nur so als Meinung ;-)
German C (2024-03-01 15:22:20+00:00): Hola gao91, bienvenido a la comunidad de openstreetmaps, veo que has agregado un nodo tipo parque dentro de un estanque de agua, te invito a que revises la siguiente guía wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Colombia/Guía_para_mapear ; generalmente el nodo leisure = park es usando en parques de las ciudades cuando un parque tiene bastante área verde (césped, árboles, jardín) y poco o ningún área en cemento, mientras que un nodo place = square (plaza) es cuando hay bastante área en cemento y muy pocos o ningún árbol o césped.
Tengo una pequeña pregunta con respecto a la etiqueta "hoyo soplador" ¿la etiqueta "hoyo soplador" hace referencia al hoyo del siguiente link www.lapaz-santander.gov.co/turismo/hoyo-del-aire ? (tal vez podemos revisar si hace referencia a lo mismo o a otro hoyo diferente para guiarte en el etiquetado).
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-18 06:47:30+00:00): The address may have changed, but it seems you didn't actually move the POI to the new location...
alexey_zakharenkov (2024-02-27 18:50:42+00:00): Более половины адресов, добавленных в этом ЧС - неправильные.
Soshal Distan Singh (2024-02-27 19:11:53+00:00): @eleonora01

>https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1255172556
>addr:place=Красная улица

Там, где был нужен addr:street, использован addr:place, и наоборот...

Пожалуйста, будьте внимательнее и заодно изучите: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Адреса#Россия
eleonora01 (2024-02-28 08:45:56+00:00): Добрый день! Адреса сверяла с Яндекс картой и кадастровым порталом. Теги исправила
alexey_zakharenkov (2024-02-28 09:00:39+00:00): eleonora01,
очень хорошо, что Вы вышли на связь. Если получше освоите правила OSM и техники рисования, Ваш вклад будет безусловно полезен.

С Яндексом больше не сверяйте - это противоречит лицензии OSM. Конкретно эти адреса есть в кадастровой карте, так что тут всё чисто.

Две ошибки, которые Вы постоянно делаете:
1) если дом адресуется не по улице, а по территории (квартал, микрорайон) то название территории заносится не в тег addr:street, а в addr:place.
2) При этом следите, чтобы
  а. Существовала соответствующая территория (place=neighbourhood/quarter/suburb)
  b. В addr:place её название было таким же.

Например, если на точке place=neighbourhood стоит name="Берёзовый микрорайон", то в адрес надо вносить addr:place="Берёзовый микрорайон", а не "микрорайон Берёзовый".
eleonora01 (2024-02-28 18:38:32+00:00): Ошибки, которые ранее совершала (речь о тегах), повторяться более не будут :)
mavl (2024-03-19 13:15:45+00:00): @eleonora01  
Здравствуйте. Сообщите, пожалуйста, все адреса, которые вы взяли из Яндекс.Карты. OpenStreetMap не имеет права их публиковать и их нужно удалить.
GeoAndi (2024-02-27 13:56:03+00:00): Ja genau, ist korrekt so wie es jetzt ist.
HAmap (2024-02-27 17:37:00+00:00): Fein :-)
NorthCrab_upload (2024-02-27 07:40:16+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11406411292
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1073794603

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eggie (2024-02-27 08:06:22+00:00): Oke en dan nu no
oneway:mofa=no en oneway:moped=no

dan is het correct.
Doe je het zelf?

MVG
eggie
iRubens (2024-02-27 08:25:43+00:00): ah ik zag die optie niet in het menu op de telefoon. later uiteindelijk gevonden onder tags.
eggie (2024-02-27 08:28:45+00:00): Mooi...  perfect zo!
Veel plezier met mappen..
eggie
theDM (2024-02-27 10:00:21+00:00): Cześć, tam droga nie idzie prosto na powierzchnię wyłączoną z ruchu.
Marek-M (2024-02-27 10:34:16+00:00): Ale skrzyżowanie jest prostopadłe do głównej drogi. Linia highway nie jest do wyznaczania pasów ruchu.
theDM (2024-02-27 11:05:10+00:00): Tam jest tylko 1 pas ruchu i jest to pas zjazdowy z Podwala. Kiedyś to była dwukierunkowa droga (m. in. podczas przebudowy wiaduktu Biskupia Górka), ale od dłuższego czasu to jest jednokierunkowa droga. Ja narysowałem jej przebieg tak, jak tam można jechać.
Marek-M (2024-02-27 11:38:40+00:00): Ale fizyczny przebieg drogi się nie zmienił - dalej odchodzi prostopadle od głównej drogi. Skrzyżowanie drogi jest tam, gdzie łączą się drogi a nie tam, gdzie jest wyznaczony pas do skrętu.
Dawid2849 (2024-02-27 18:13:17+00:00): Ta droga straciła numer?
szalona_entropia (2024-02-27 19:03:31+00:00): Wydaje mi się, że jeszcze nie i w komunikacie GDDKiA jest błąd. Na mapie GDDKiA nadal jest ten fragment jako DK5 (po włączeniu warstwy słupki pikietażowe): https://drogi.gddkia.gov.pl/
Na mapie DSDiK też jest jako DK5. https://dsdik.wroc.pl/infrastruktura/wykaz-drog-wojewodzkich-na-dolnym-slasku.html
tekim (2024-03-06 01:54:45+00:00): Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap!  Thanks for your edits.  Because of Google's terms of use, we are not allowed to use Google's map products (maps, imagery, street view) when editing OpenStreetMap.
3c3deaec2a259ca3f4aaea5b216bf150 (2024-03-15 06:12:08+00:00): Hi @tekim, 
the commentfield is very short, first i tried to copy a link to a news article from the town Emden and describe, that it resolves the error report. Than i thought i have to write something, that everyone can check on it's own.

So this correction is not based on Google or Apple material, that was only the reference, everyone can check, the easy way. Sorry for the confusion.
3c3deaec2a259ca3f4aaea5b216bf150 (2024-03-15 06:12:57+00:00): https://www.emden.de/rathaus/verwaltung/stabsstellen/vorstandsbuero/pressestelle/pressemitteilungen/strassenreparaturarbeiten-im-tide-winenga-weg-und-der-ubierstrasse-vom-0410-08102021-1
Warin61 (2024-02-28 23:56:06+00:00): A relation is not required for the school - just tag the outer way. 

The tag 'building=yes' says the whole site is one building .. not the case. 

The DCS Base Map gives better boundaries for objects like schools, parks etc. 

I have changed this, see what you think.
eggie (2024-02-27 08:50:09+00:00): Oke...  indat geval een barrier=gate maken van die noexit=yes in dei brandgang parallele aan de Nyevelthof. 

Op het hek accessstags toevoegen.
bv access=private locked=yes
Dan routeert het niet meer.
gr eggie