piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
canfe (2024-02-10 11:14:19+00:00): Più che tutto, come ho commentato sulla pagina del CAI di OSM questo "strano ref" attiva un errore su OSMOSE per tutte le sedi CAI.
Quelle sarebbero da sistemare!

missing tag
source:ref without ref

node 8638281710 josm iD edit

addr:city = Viù
addr:housenumber = 2
addr:place = piazza Cibrario
addr:postcode = 10070
email = info@caiviu.it
name = Club Alpino Italiano - Sottosezione Valle di Viù
note:it = Sezione Lanzo Torinese
office = association
opening_hours = Sa 20:30-22:30
operator = Club Alpino Italiano
operator:short = CAI
operator:wikidata = Q795273
source = survey:CAI
source:ref = 9112052
website = http://www.caiviu.it
somehundred (2024-02-02 23:33:20+00:00): Pieliku noexit tagus, lai atrisinātu almost-junction problēmas, kas ID rādījās. Izdzēšot tos, tu atkal šīs problēmas atjaunoji. Kāds ir tavs risinājums šai šīm almost-junction problēmām?
richlv (2024-02-03 02:29:26+00:00): Es te ar skatu no malas - man nav viedokļa par konkrēto tagu, bet kopumā:

"It is important to understand that warnings are just warnings, they should be examined and fixed where possible but never at the cost of introducing wrong data. Some validators warnings are generated for valid data. Often in such cases validator code should be fixed, not OSM data. Sometimes false positives are unavoidable."

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Quality_assurance
HellMap (2024-02-03 10:48:27+00:00): Kā jau minēts, tās nav automātiski problēmas. Tas, ka iD to rāda kā "warning" (un "warning" nav "error"), nenozīmē, ka tos nepieciešams labot. (Tur pat blakus iD ir arī "ignore" poga.) Ja tu atvērsi JOSM redaktoru, tur būtu vēl simtiem "problēmu", pie tam tās ne tikai nesakrīt ar iD, bet redaktori vispār piedāvā katrs savu "risinājumu". Un ir vēl daudz visādu rīku, kur var sameklēt bezgalīgas "problēmas", piemēram https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/ , https://maproulette.org , https://nominatim.org/qa/ utt. Neviens no tiem nav simtprocentīgi labojams. Daudzi ir pašsaprotami, bet ir pietiekami piemēru, kur ir jāsaprot "problēmas" iemesls un vai konkrētā situācijā tā vispār ir problēma.

Konkrēti šeit - `noexit` is tegs, kas domāts, lai citiem kartētājiem norādītu neviennozīmīgās situācijās, ka ceļi nesavienojas un ka tā nav kartēšanas kļūda. Ja starp ceļiem ir iezīmēta barjera, tad tas ir standarta viennozīmīgs gadījums, kad `noexit` nav nepieciešams ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:noexit%3Dyes#Alternatives ). Varbūt ir argumenti arī likt šeit to `noexit=yes`. Bet tad tas ir jādara saprotot tega nozīmi un lietojumu un pamatojot šo izmaiņu, bet nevis automātiski.
Vonter (2024-02-02 17:26:11+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Congrats on your first contributions to OpenStreetMap! If you’re interested in connecting with other mappers, do consider joining the regional OSM groups:

**OSM Bengaluru**

Telegram: https://telegram.me/OSM_BLR

Matrix: https://matrix.to/#/#OSM_BLR:matrix.org

**OSM India**

Telegram: https://telegram.me/OSMIndia

Matrix: https://matrix.to/#/#osm-in-general:matrix.org

Happy Mapping!
arjunaraoc (2024-02-21 05:16:22+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). 
Reverted your edits as they are not valid vide https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147717193
OrangeHurst97 (2024-02-05 11:07:47+00:00): Hello owen4584 and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
It appears that you have deleted a car park which should have remained present (it is still in use as such), so I have reverted these edits in changeset 147088877.
bxl-forever (2024-02-02 17:11:26+00:00): Hello,

We moved the node to its new location on Rue du Luxembourg/Luxemburgstraat.  (And we removed the address on the object itself, addresses are exclusively written on address points and not repeated multiple times; moreover, addresses in Brussels must be written in the two official languages.)
somehundred (2024-02-02 23:42:45+00:00): Ja jau layer variants nav derīgs, tad kāpēc ID to visoār piedāvā kā risinājumu? Personīgi es neredzu tajā problēmu. Protams, nenoliedzami, covered=yes uz highway variants arī ir derīgs.
HellMap (2024-02-03 11:14:29+00:00): iD nav tik gudrs redaktors un par risinājumu bieži piedāvā ļoti vienkāršus risinājumus, jo tie der 95% gadījumu. Bet šeit ir viens no tiem piemēriem, kur ir iekartēts daudz un smalki, bet ne līdz galam un ar nepilnībām. iD tādas nianses nesaprot (un neviens rīks tādas nekad līdz galam nesapratīs).

`layer` variants var būt derīgs, bet tam tad ir jābūt pareizi pret citiem elementiem. Varbūt te arī var uzlikt tikai `layer=1`, ja tas visu pareizi atrisina. Bet galvenais šeit ir, ja tu to sauc par izlabošanu, tad tu esi reāli sapratis situāciju un to izlabojis ar pamatojumu. Bet tā kā šis labojums bija no lielas izmaiņas visādās vietās, man nešķiet, ka tu šeit pārbaudīji līdz galam:

Vai tu ņēmi vērā, ka šeit ir `building:part=roof`? Kāpēc tam nav `layer`? Vai nevajag arī `building:part=retail`, kur savienojas `entrance=shop`?

Vai tas, ka šeit `highway=pedestrian` un `highway=footway` ir vienā līmenī, bet footway is ar `covered=yes`, bet `pedestrian` tāda nav? Tātad tie nemaz teorētiski savā starpā nav maršrutējami.

Vai `highway=pedestrian` vispār būtu jāsavienojas ar `building:part=roof`, ja tie ir dažādos līmeņos?

Te ir jālabo daudz ilgāk par iD piedāvāto risināju un es pat pateikt uzreiz nevaru, kāds variants būtu precīzākais. Tāpēc arī tā "problēma" šeit ir - jo kādam tas ir uzmanīgi jākartē. Man personīgi nav bijis laika tam pagaidām. Šeit pat piezīme atstāta https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2017571 . Nospiest "tag as higher" es un citi jau varēja sen, bet tas nav pareizais risinājums šeit.
limes11 (2024-08-15 17:11:31+00:00): Moin,

du hast hier 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1245611255/history

mit access=no ausgestattet.

War das beabsichtigt ? Dieser track ist im Bayernatlas vorhanden, zudem hat er ebenfalls motor_vehicle-access-tags, die nun keinen Sinn mehr ergeben.

Vielen Dank für eine kurze Rückmeldung.

Limes
limes11 (2024-08-18 08:35:44+00:00): geändert, da kein Feedback
Daywalkercaching (2024-08-18 17:21:08+00:00): Hi Limes11,
Danke fürs ändern. Ich bin beruflich auf Dienstreise im Ausland und hab nur sporadisch Zugriff auf meine Emails. Access=no wird wahrscheinlich nicht korrekt sein.
marc__marc (2024-09-21 23:48:41+00:00): Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1227587011/history
I don't see any reason to delete this route to solve a routing problem, so I've restored it.
feel free to explain what's wrong and if it's necessary to delete it, also delete the nodes in the path instead of leaving lots of orphan nodes.
Regards,
Marc
Kovoschiz (2024-02-07 08:04:47+00:00): The name has already been consulted. Your useless "update" comment doesn't do anything but make it worse. 
Please don't directly copy the PWP title. `name=` is the proper name only. It should reflect what it will open as. Don't add comma addresses, brackets , etc. Descriptor labels belong to `description=` .
NorthCrab_upload (2024-02-02 17:20:55+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Powstańców 1863 roku":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/357276886
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1193018779
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1193018780
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1193018787
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1193018791

"Józefa Piłsudskiego":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1202276704

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Szymson (2024-02-02 18:43:17+00:00): Dlaczego uncontrolled? Tam jest sygnalizacja świetlna
erickdeoliveiraleal (2024-02-04 14:38:35+00:00): isso ta totalmente errado, desenhar vários caminhos de pedestre dentro de uma quadra, como isto aqui: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1245614826 . Você se apresentou como engenheiro. Ok se é um engenheiro pare de adicionar dados que não existem ao mapa, voce ja foi avisado mais de uma vez, vai perder seu tempo e o nosso. Toda edição é monitorada e as suas mais ainda. Uma vez voce criou uma cidade gigante falsa e tive que reverter.
gscholz (2024-04-14 08:55:23+00:00): Hi Harvesterify,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-2.75537&lat=47.66398&zoom=18&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=146994459

This is caused by a bug in "osm-relatify", leading to duplicate streets when you split a roundabout (which is disputable anyways).

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Harvesterify (2024-04-14 10:24:15+00:00): Done, thanks for reporting :)
ftrebien (2025-03-11 01:01:40+00:00): Há placas no local indicando que o limite de velocidade nas marginais é de 60km/h, não 80km/h.
CurlingMan13 (2024-02-02 19:49:00+00:00): Again, this changeset has been reverted.  Access tags should be used instead to restrict access, rather than deleting the features all together.

You can read why it won't be deleted here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146998754
Fizzie-DWG (2024-02-03 02:31:44+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15654
SekeRob (2024-02-03 06:27:08+00:00): Hi

Welcome to OSM. In your first effort you mapped some builing on top of a driveway end. Either the building needs adjusting or the way posituon corrected. The summary above this edit warns for 1 such case.

Happy mapping
ftrebien (2025-07-02 04:49:25+00:00): Não é 80 km/h. Há várias placas ao longo de todo o trecho indicando que é 40 km/h.
ftrebien (2025-03-09 16:11:40+00:00): Há placas no local indicando que o limite de velocidade é 40 km/h, como estava mapeado, não 60 km/h, como você mapeou.
ftrebien (2025-03-09 16:12:36+00:00): Além disso, nesse município, a maioria das vias classificadas como "principais" no plano diretor que têm sinalização indicam um limite de 40 km/h, portanto, na ausência de sinalização, faz mais sentido admitir que esse é o limite padrão dessas vias.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2024-02-04 14:35:14+00:00): escreveu errado: Termina Rodoviário de Saúde
emersonveenstra (2024-02-03 13:23:04+00:00): Hi there,

This changeset created https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1245625754, which appears to be incorrect since it's overlapping several roads.  Could you please look and fix it? Thanks!
dpaschich (2024-02-04 04:18:56+00:00): Thanks for the heads up, that thing just shouldn't be there at all! Removed it.
AngocA (2024-06-13 22:59:23+00:00): Hi NFZANMNIM

I see you modified the relation for Planadas, but you included as part of this relation all the inner relations, which is incorrect. Boundary realtions are not superboundaries.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1342093/history
Hungerburg (2024-02-09 19:53:37+00:00): Das Iglerbahnmarterl hat einen neuen Standort :) Nun auch ein Foto auf commons https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Iglerbahnmarterl.jpg
emersonveenstra (2024-02-03 13:23:57+00:00): Hi there,

This changeset introduced https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1245629048#map=19/47.61723/-110.95242 which has no tags. Could you please go back and tag it? Thanks!
emersonveenstra (2024-02-03 13:24:12+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1245629079#map=18/47.60860/-110.90954 as well
amacmcgrann (2024-02-16 03:22:36+00:00): Done.
RaphaelPasloin (2024-02-03 03:17:55+00:00): Hello Philippec, 

For this one : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4065313123 

The park has been refurbished and it’s no more the same drinking water location and model : see https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=225700460360829
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=318528810874570

Can you fix oldest images with currents one ? 

Have a good day,
Raphaël
Svalbard (2024-02-03 06:48:52+00:00): Hallo ncleanser, wo hast Du Deine Massenänderung [1] diskutiert und dokumentiert? Gruß Svalbard

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct
Svalbard (2024-02-18 09:30:20+00:00): Hallo ncleanser, leider habe ich von Dir noch keine Antwort auf meine Frage erhalten. Wann kann ich damit rechnen? Mit der Löschung von „noexit“ an den ways hast Du für andere Mapper gänzlich die Information entfernt, dass eine Sackgasse besteht, die falsch getaggt wurde. Mit dieser Information hätte man, mit Überprüfung vor Ort, das „noexit“ auf den End-Node des ways setzen und die Information „Sackgasse“ erhalten können. Gruß Svalbard
george1201 (2024-03-30 22:52:46+00:00): Hallo Radbubi,
du hast einen zweiten Knoten für Eichsteller angelegt. Gibt es tatsächlich zwei Läden hier? Einer in Hausnummer 4, der andere in 6? Auf der Website wird nur die Nummer 6 erwähnt.
Radbubi (2024-03-30 23:33:09+00:00): Hallo george1201,
ja, es gibt in der 2 Eichsteller, einmal ein normales Bekleidungsgeschäft und einmal den US-Shop. Ich habe das beim US-Shop anhand der Webseite und der Telefonnummer präzisiert.
george1201 (2024-03-30 23:43:56+00:00): Na gut, wenn es tatsächlich zwei Läden sind. Der US-Shop ist dann in Nr. 4? Und die Postanschrift für beide ist wohl die Nr. 6.
george1201 (2024-03-30 23:46:07+00:00): Falsch, ich muss mich korrigieren. Auf der von dir neu hinzugefügten Website steht die Nr. 4. Dann passt ja alles.
george1201 (2024-03-30 23:48:48+00:00): Jetzt könnte man noch streiten, ob es "Eichsteller US Shop" oder "US Shop Eichsteller" heißt. Muss man wohl gucken, was am Laden steht.
Radbubi (2024-03-30 23:54:17+00:00): Ich habe mich hier nun an die Postadresse/Anschrift auf der Webseite unten gehalten. Die Frage ist nur, ob mit oder ohne Bindestrich. Die Postadresse hat keinen, beim Copyright ganz unten gibt es einen.
george1201 (2024-03-31 07:17:27+00:00): Guten Morgen.
Als name-tag nehme ich meist das, was am Laden steht. Im Impressum der Website findet man das official_name-tag.
Radbubi (2024-03-31 09:48:53+00:00): Im Impressum ist der Betreiber gelistet. Am Laden selbst wird man in dem Fall auch nicht schlauer.
vjyblauw (2024-02-07 15:13:38+00:00): worden deze bushaltes terug gezet na de werken de werken aan het Sint-Jozefsplein Terkerkenlaan. zie https://staging.oudenaarde.be › nl › heraanleg-sint-jozefsplein-en-omgeving 
Of is dit een vaste verplaatsing.
multimob (2024-02-08 17:58:37+00:00): Hallo,
Dit is een goede vraag.  Volgens De Lijn is er geen verplaatsing (meer) voor die haltes.
Volgens deze pagina (https://www.oudenaarde.be/nl/nieuws/werken-op-en-rond-het-sint-jozefsplein) zitten we nu in fase 2+3, en Bulkendreef is beschikbaar voor het algemene verkeer.
Kan helaas niet overaal ter plaatse gaan controleren maar het lijkt dat de haltes wel terug zijn op de plein.  Heb jij misschien informatie hierover?
vjyblauw (2024-02-09 09:24:35+00:00): Vroeger stonden deze haltes aan de school V.T.I. Sint-Lucas Ter Eecken.
Zie https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2354594665#map=17/50.85297/3.61452

Sint-Jozefsplein en Terkerkenlaan zijn niet toegankelijk. Er waren twee routes van V.T.I. Naar Sportcentrum via Ter Eecken, Terkerkenlaan, Vlaanderenstraat (eenrichtingsverkeer) en Galgestraat.
En van sportcentrum naar V.T.I., via Galgestraat, Bulkendreef, Terkerkenlaan, Ter Eecken.
Daarom mijn vraag als deze werken voorbij zijn de haltes terug verplaatst worden naar de school.

Maar volgens de lijn dus niet.
ma-rt-in (2024-02-03 20:41:23+00:00): Hallo,
Wie kommst Du darauf, daß Fußgänger diesen Weg nicht nutzen dürfen? Bitte nicht Daten ändern, die nur eurem Nutzen dienen!
Vg
stimme-logistik (2024-02-03 21:33:47+00:00): Hi, das wollte ich eigentlich nicht eingeben - sondern dass es sich hier um einen Grasnabenweg handelt ... diese werden von unsererm System ignoriert - wo habe ich genau eingegeben, dass Fußgänger nicht nutzen dürfen? Bin hier noch ziemlich neu unterwegs - danke für deine Info. 
LG
ma-rt-in (2024-02-04 17:50:21+00:00): Was heißt von "unserem" System? Bist du im Auftrag deines Unternehmen hier in OSM aktiv? Wenn ja, dann bitte folgendes unbedingt befolgen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines
stimme-logistik (2024-02-05 08:39:33+00:00): ich bin neu in OSM unterwegs - arbeite aber seit 4 Jahren mit GIS-Systemen und haben die Software gewechselt, welche auf OSM zugreift. 

Wir wurden in die OSM Bearbeitung eingewiesen - aber hier ist mir tatsächlich was durchgegangen.
habi (2024-02-02 20:14:25+00:00): Keine Nozizen geschlossen, das war Changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146996705
habi (2024-02-02 20:15:32+00:00): Das hier ist eine "Korrektur" von https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146445849
d_berger (2024-02-06 01:05:44+00:00): Spannend, seit Jahren sind es immer wieder die angefressenen Bahnmapper, die historisches wiederholt von Null auf mappen. Früher fand ich es schade, dass dies gelöscht wurde, aber mittlerweile muss ich zugeben, dass ich ganz froh bin, kommen solche Sachen weg, bevor iD oder StreetComplete vorschlagen, dass man dort doch sicher wieder irgendwas umtaggen könnte...

Bei alten ÖV-Relationen (mit LC-prefix 'disused' oder 'was') kommt glaub iD immer mit einem Korrekturvorschlag. :-/  Seither gilt für mich: in JOSM speichern und löschen, da bei gewissen Nutzern das Leseverständnis nicht mit deren Klickfreude korreliert...

Aber eigentlich wollte ich was völlig anderes anmerken: Steg an der Thunstrasse 96, links vom Burgernziel, dürfte aufgrund Insolvenz wohl 'disused' sein... :-?
habi (2024-02-06 07:56:54+00:00): Ja, der STEG-Laden ist definitiv leer, das habe ich beim durchvelölen gesehen.
Ehrlicherweise habe ich gedacht, dass ich das schon angepasst habe :)

In https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147123307 nachgeholt.
c0nsumer (2024-10-24 12:49:54+00:00): In this changeset you connected an under-construction path to the Paint Creek Trail, indicating there's a path that goes across a river. As of 24-November-2024 this is under construction and marked do not enter. Mapping resulted in folks being routed to a dead-end.

This has been corrected in 158295326.
Trail_Caretaker (2024-10-24 15:20:01+00:00): Thank you for correcting this.  All I see on the map now is the large changeset rectangle.  Do you mind  explaining where it is or show me with a Google pindrop link?  

Isn't "24-November-2024" in the future?

Thank you.
c0nsumer (2024-10-24 18:47:14+00:00): Doh, yeah. I got the month wrong. It's as of today, 24-Oct-2024. There is a bridge planned for this area, but it won't happen until next year at least.

Regardless, use OSMCha to look at the changeset that I referenced: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158295326 . I recommend familiarizing yourself with OSMCha as it's useful to track down what changes broke things and for assigning blame when things get mis-mapped.

You can see the old path and it after my edit, which shows it now not connecting to the Paint Creek Trail.

The error in your edit was not confirming the physical state of the path before mapping it, and this resulted in a dead-end as folks trying to get to the PCT were directed down a dead end.

Please, when you are editing: validate your changes, even if it takes going there in person, to confirm that what you are mapping is accurate. Had you visited this location you would have seen both the gate at the start of the trail, markings that it's closed, and seen that it does not connect to the PCT.

Also, keep your changesets small. This change of yours was pretty large, and this also makes it difficult to track things down.
c0nsumer (2024-10-24 18:58:43+00:00): I just found another issue with this changeset. You changed some marker numbers in Bald Mountain to match the DNR map, but this is actually wrong. OSM had the correct locations mapped, until after you change.

Again, please actually CHECK what you are mapping and don't just copy what you find online. You've once again generated bad data doing so. I'll fix this in yet another changeset.
marczoutendijk (2024-02-08 09:26:02+00:00): What is "their app" supposed to indicate?
  
Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
chimel38 (2024-03-11 15:05:10+00:00): Bonjour,
Vous avez mention Ex-École primaire Joliot Curie  on pourrait supposer que cette école n'existe plus.
Sur le site de la Ville aucune mention confirme cette situation.
BubbaJuice (2024-05-30 05:02:12+00:00): Most of this track exists, why did you delete the whole thing?
woodpeck_repair (2024-06-15 22:29:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 152740214, 152740288, 152740274, 152740234, 152740192, 152740169, 152740167, 152740249, 152740178 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions by Hamilton 44/Delta Evas ALL, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16207
jak_hor96 (2024-02-10 16:23:39+00:00): Zdravím, z akého dôvodu bola spojená rezidenčná zóna týchto 2 obcí? kedže sa jedná o samostatné obce a medzi nimi sa nachádza veľký počet poľnohospodárskych plôch a lúk, čiže sa určite nejedná o rezidenčnú zónu a taktiež to vyzerá veľmi neprakticky na mape, dáva to dojem, že sa jedná o veľmi veľkú obec
Mayllo9 (2024-03-18 18:35:19+00:00): Nespajal som rezidencne zony
Baloo Uriza (2024-11-21 18:01:56+00:00): Be sure to update or remove source:maxspeed as well.  Is this named Broadway this far out??
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146998819
zorglubu (2024-02-08 12:17:37+00:00): Bonjour mga_geo,

La suppression massive de l'attribut bus est peut-être un bonne idée, mais a-t-elle été discutée auparavant sur un forum avec les contributeurs français ?

Si ce n'est pas le cas, je pense qu'il serait préférable de rapidement annuler ces modifs et lancer la discussion, par exemple sur https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/

Bien cordialement.
mga_geo (2024-02-08 13:12:38+00:00): Bonjour,
Cette discussion a eu lieu il y a quelques années avec en conclusion un article de Noémie : https://nlehuby.5apps.com/bien-cartographier-les-bus.html
Marc
zorglubu (2024-02-08 18:45:27+00:00): Merci pour la réponse. Le principe de base OSM reste néanmoins de signaler sur le forum ce nettoyage, je présume que personne ne s'y serait opposé. Ou au moins mettre un lien vers la discussion actant cette modif de masse.
Le fait qu'il y ait un consensus sur la façon de faire ne crée pas un feu vert pour tout changer sans vérif, non ?
mga_geo (2024-02-09 06:46:06+00:00): Bonjour,
Sur les réseaux de bus, surtout régionaux, toutes les modifications s'apparentent à de la modification de masse. Dans le cas particulier de Nantes, je l'avais bien signalé https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/transport-en-commun-bus-en-loire-atlantique-44/20584/16?u=marc et cela n'avait pas donné lieu à des objections.
Bonne journée
Marc
NorthCrab_upload (2024-02-02 20:20:49+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Jana Sobieskiego":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1187889481
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1187889483
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1198063043

"Armii Kraków":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1187921238
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1198063220

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Joseph R P (2024-02-14 17:02:27+00:00): Hello, do you know what happened in this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146999337? My assumption is that two relations were erroneously merged somehow, judging off of "Pocomoke Sound;Thorofare Hill" rendering.
Necessarycoot72 (2024-02-14 22:06:32+00:00): Sorry about that, seems that I merged an island node with the relation and not its duplicate area fixed.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147468326
Joseph R P (2024-02-16 01:31:55+00:00): No worries! Thank you for fixing it.
emersonveenstra (2024-02-03 13:27:01+00:00): Hi there,

This changeset broke a relation: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/171569#map=14/35.9412/-107.6255

Could you please fix it? Thanks!
user_12523467 (2024-02-02 21:34:16+00:00): Good job.