piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2025-07-31 15:28:35+00:00): Hi pat-lachute, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 1 landuse(')

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=169776368
NeisReview (2025-07-31 19:12:00+00:00): Thank you for your private message and confirming that your deletions were intentional.
Hb- (2025-09-13 06:36:12+00:00): Warum haben alle 13 Kinder jetzt den gleichen Namen?  Wäre dort nicht eine Namensergänzung mit einem regionalen Bezug angezeigt? Zum Beispiel "B1 MOL-B" für den Abschnitt https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4453630 ?
Berlin53 (2025-09-13 13:28:15+00:00): Einen Extranamen in der Superroute gibt es nicht. Die Namen in den einzelnen Relationen zu ändern widerspricht dem Wiki für das Mappen von Bundesstraßen. Du könntest evtl. die Abschnitte mit einem description-Tag ergänzen.
Berlin53 (2025-09-13 13:35:56+00:00): Es gibt noch einen section-Tag mit einer Durchnummerierung. Auch der könnte ggf. ergänzt/geändert werden.
Hb- (2025-09-13 15:06:07+00:00): Das Wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Germany/Bundesstra%C3%9Fen#Hinweise_zum_Taggen_und_zur_Benennung fordert nur den ref=B 1. Der hier noch freie name= könnte Bundesstraße 1 Abschnitt MOL-B lauten. Ähnlich wie beim Elberadweg. Die section-Angabe ist sicherlich nett, aber in Übersichten nicht zu sehen.
Berlin53 (2025-09-14 09:34:11+00:00): Bin hier fündig geworden: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:route%3Droad#Zuordnung_der_Stra%C3%9Fe_zum_Netzwerk . Nun ist die B 1 kein Netzwerk (deswegen Superroute) aber die Namensgebung könnte man übernehmen: Bundesstraße 1 (Abschnitt MOL-B). Dieser Name in der route=road wird offensichtlich nirgends ausgewertet wenn der Tag highway=* fehlt.
JJIglesias (2025-08-01 06:48:40+00:00): Los Dos Colegios estaban correctamente identificados. Favor NO CAMBIAR data oficial.
Gracias
Fizzie-DWG (2025-08-02 07:11:48+00:00): DWG revert - apparent fake, or poorly mapped, beaches

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169847618
evgenykatyshev (2025-08-01 08:27:34+00:00): Hi! I see you tried to change location of Fiesta bar. I've fixed it, please check if it's correct now. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10928781698
Fizzie-DWG (2025-08-02 07:11:49+00:00): DWG revert - apparent fake, or poorly mapped, beaches

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169847618
user_5359 (2025-07-31 17:53:45+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please add more information like address and opening_hours to the node. Are you sure, that the node on the correct end of the street?
kc202053 (2025-07-31 18:44:47+00:00): It should be on the correct end of the street, yes - I made the marker while I was physically in the building.

I'll add additional data ASAP; I apologize for not providing much on my initial submission! Still trying to navigate this site.
NeisBot (2025-07-31 16:17:05+00:00): Hi Stenhuggare, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Added a new beach feature by creating nodes and a way, tagging it as natural=beach."

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish #AIgenerated
Fizzie-DWG (2025-08-02 07:16:16+00:00): Hej Stenhuggare. Tack för din entusiasm, men se till att du bara kartlägger riktiga stränder, och när du gör det, var noga med att bara kartlägga sanden, inte angränsande vägar, hus och vatten! Tack, Graeme Fitzpatrick, Moderator, OSMF Data Working Group

Hello Stenhuggare. Thank you fr your enthusiasm, but please make sure that you only map real beaches, and when you do, please take more care to only map the sand, not adjoining roads, houses and water! Thank you, Graeme Fitzpatrick, Moderator, OSMF Data Working Group
rskedgell (2025-07-31 21:31:53+00:00): Is there a sign explicitly referring to PSVs, as psv=yes seems unlikely? It's not a synonym for bus=yes or bus=yes + taxi=yes.
user_22883145 (2025-08-01 05:33:03+00:00): I removed the PSV tag, Its a No Entry sign with 'Except buses', so I amended it to bus=yes, I was mainly adding in the missing `Access=*` tag
Dimitar155 (2025-07-31 20:13:50+00:00): Контейнера за кухненско олио е дубликат на https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12708376350, или просто е бил преместен.
tevildo_ (2025-07-31 20:22:41+00:00): Оправено. Не бях го забелязал.
user_5359 (2025-07-31 16:58:35+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1059087063. Did you really mean building:levels=9-12 or did you mean grades? See https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dschool
fredlenoir (2025-12-04 07:25:03+00:00): bonjour, il ne s'agit pas d'une hightway=cycleway mais bien cycleway:(buffer):right=lane (piste cyclable marquée (non séparée) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cycleway%3Dlane
Leo Slager (2025-08-01 19:49:28+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
gscscnd (2025-08-02 09:01:17+00:00): Jakieś old_name by miało sens?
mark2525 (2025-08-02 19:09:33+00:00): Ten teren nie miał żadnej nazwy. Nazwę Manifest Lipcowy wprowadził sobie Malinovsky.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-26 15:15:33+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13039712173/history has width = 0 that was added in this edit
how something exist and have width=0?
Kees 59 (2026-03-02 16:34:23+00:00): Hoi. volgens mij zit hier een typefoutje. De website link staat in de key wetland.
A67-A67 (2026-03-03 00:11:25+00:00): Dankjewel. Ik heb het verbeterd.
user_5359 (2025-08-01 17:32:09+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/8234695347. What is the mean of the tag diease:clas = 1? Is there any difference to diease:class?
Please notice also the date format for survey:date = 2025-07-31 (YYYY-MM-DD) instead of survey:date = 20250731
brianh (2025-08-01 20:17:33+00:00): Hello, I was at a session to show citizen scientists how to recognise the four levels of disease in Ash trees (genus=Fraxinus) as they estimate 96%+ of all the ash trees will be lost in Europe to ash dieback disease over the next ten years. They are growing new trees from resistant ones as well as studying why and how they are resistant. Hence the need for data. While walking with the group I suddenly decided to use Vespucci to grab some samples. I had corrected the tagging last evening and I believe now all is in order. Brian
user_5359 (2025-08-01 18:01:24+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/13039716094.  What is the mean of the tag FAMILAR = 55?
Please notice the use british english for the keys.
Syl (2025-08-03 19:45:56+00:00): Bonsoir, le bac à verre a été remplacé par un deuxième bac à vêtements c'est bien ça ?
Syl (2025-08-05 07:29:46+00:00): Après vérification sur place j'ai annulé la modification, le bac à verre est toujours là et il n'y a qu'un bac à vêtements.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-11 01:07:07+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13039726526/history has shop = verduras that was added in this edit
shop=verduras kiosk ? Maybe shop=greengrocer was intended? If they truly sell solely only vegetables then maybe extra tag like greengrocer=vegetables would be better? If they sell also fruits then https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=greengrocer is definitely better.

shop=greengrocer is far more widely used and supported and does fit even if only variety of vegetables is sold.

But maybe another shop tag would fit better? Maybe shop=farm? ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=farm )
silversurfer83 (2025-07-31 20:43:57+00:00): Hi

POI (wie hier ein Geschäft, welches mit an Sicherheit grenzender Wahrscheinlichkeit im EG liegt) sollten besser getrennt von der Gebäudegeometrie erfasst werden. Es sieht so aus, als hättest du einfach über den preset des Editors den Geschäftstyp ausgewählt. Damit hat der Editor dann den tag "building=*" entfernt.

Da es sich um unterschiedliche Objekte handelt wäre es in Zunkunft besser, diese auch getrennt zu halten.

Hab das Gebäude wieder hinzugefügt.

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169780283
Cowboy79 (2025-08-01 11:41:07+00:00): So ähnlich war's gelaufen. Nur dass jetzt wieder ein Einfamilienhaus da steht, was es natürlich nicht ist. Es müsste building=yes sein, nicht house und nicht gar nichts. Es ist ein Mehrfamilien-Reihen-Mittel-Haus mit Geschäftseinheit im EG. Kann man das noch ändern ohne einen neuen Änderungssatz zu erstellen?
silversurfer83 (2025-08-01 14:52:01+00:00): Alles klar.
Nein. Das Gebäude mit dem passenderem "building=apartments" zu taggen erzeugt einen neuen Änderungssatz.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dapartments
tux67 (2025-08-01 12:40:12+00:00): den hab' ich dann auch noch mal mit dem way verbunden
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169780417
The Invisible Freak (2025-08-01 15:41:05+00:00): den hatte ich doch gestern schon korrigiert...
dachte ich.
tux67 (2025-08-01 15:51:06+00:00): War aber nicht als node des ways gemappt.
user_5359 (2025-08-01 17:59:38+00:00): Hello! Please have alook on https://www.osm.org/way/1418970092. What is the mean of the tags
aktualit = 2022-12-13
fktkurz = 51009_1610
funktion = Überdachung
gebnutzbez = Sonstiges Bauwerk Oder Sonstige Einrichtung
oid = DEBWL001000dgbrWBL?
(no other OSM keys)
Harald Hetzner (2025-08-01 18:56:41+00:00): An unnoticed leftover from the source data. To be replaced with building=roof.
NeisBot (2025-07-31 17:07:10+00:00): Hi plumage1911, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Added a surveillance camera node with ALPR functionality."

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish #AIgenerated
user_5359 (2025-07-31 17:02:22+00:00): Sorry, problem before the keyboard! Correct address notation is the correct change set comment. Alos ask the original author for the building:levels value.
CAM-Gerlach (2026-05-27 02:58:23+00:00): Removed SEO spam tags and fixed incorrect top-level and other tags in changeset 183235246 and restored inexplicably removed building=* tag in changeset 183235301

https://osm.org/changeset/183235246
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183235301
AndreaDp271 (2025-07-31 17:36:12+00:00): Hi, I don't understand what you changed, can you explain to me?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169782005
AndreaDp271 (2025-07-31 17:36:15+00:00): Hi, I don't understand what you changed, can you explain to me?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169782091
dadavid (2025-08-04 13:51:54+00:00): good catch, danke dir :) 

Weiterhin viel Spaß bei osm 

David
Fizzie-DWG (2025-08-06 04:09:54+00:00): DWG revert - incorrect changes in conflict zone

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170035612
SomeoneElse (2026-01-17 01:36:13+00:00): Hello,
I'm a bit surprised by the "vehicle=agricultural" tag on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/948841343/history .  That suggests that anyone can use the track "for agricultural purposes".  What's far more likely is that it is just private?
Best Regards.
Andy
vogelfreier (2026-01-18 16:57:32+00:00): Hello,

In retrospect, it could also be that up to the missing building, there is something like ‘no private access’ and then ‘access=agricultural’ into the cattle pasture?! Perhaps because farmer X does not live there and he has a right of way to access it.

Regards, Rüdiger

Translated with deepl.com
SomeoneElse (2026-01-18 18:40:09+00:00): There isn't really such a thing as "access=agricultural" in England and Wales.  Sometimes access along lanes like this will be private, and sometimes people keeping sheep will rent fields off each other , but their access doesn't make it "not private".  Sometimes there may be permissive foot or horse access and sometimes (though not here) a legal right of way.
Here there may also be some sort of fishing access to the Nidd?
When the weather improves a bit and I do the next bit of Nidderdale Way I might get chance to have a look :)
Piskvor (2025-08-01 07:42:22+00:00): Zdravím,

díky za doplnění mapy, trochu jsem to ještě upravil drive_through znamená "prodej z okýnka do auta" ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Key:drive_through ); pro "neprůjezdné autem" se používá motorcar=no (viz https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Key:access ). Přidal jsem to, ačkoli u jersey barrier se neprůjezdnost pro auta očekává.

Mapování zdar,
@Piskvor
Pavel Hrdina (2025-08-01 15:39:23+00:00): Zdarec, diky!
Fizzie-DWG (2025-08-06 04:25:36+00:00): DWG revert - incorrect changes in conflict zone
mapbear66 (2025-08-02 14:24:30+00:00): Hi there. 

I really like much of the mapping you've been doing in this area but have an observation. 

Many of these tracks you have been putting in around the edge of fields don't appear to be on aerial photography, Bing or ESRI. I was wondering your source for the tracks? Or whether you've been a bit overly keen on interpreting mowing or ploughing marks as tracks? 

Another was you've marked some boundaries between fields as scrub. I'd expect these to be barrier=hedge as scrub is really for larger areas?

Thanks.
ViriatoLusitano (2025-08-02 14:41:03+00:00): Hello mapbear66, thank you for your nice comment.

About the tracks, the purpose is to show (and allow) routing between farms that are far away from a normal road. I'm referring these parts: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1418985692

The tracks leading to those parts are often not in aerial photography as you mentioned. To avoid randomness I just do a track that hugs the perimeter to connect these links between farms.

As for the hedges, in most cases I cannot see the barriers themselves from my on-foot surveys, nor in the aerial imagery. I go with the option of mapping these boundaries between farms as scrub since they fit the wiki description of "uncultivated land covered with shrubs, bushes or stunted trees".

Happy to discuss more about this in case you have issues with this mapping.
mapbear66 (2025-08-02 15:06:17+00:00): Tracks: you should not be mapping things for routing, much like not mapping for a renderer. Your tracks cannot be verified by someone else as they don't exist on the ground. 

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Map_what's_on_the_ground for useful info on this. 

Please review those you have put in. 

Hedges vs scrub. It's tricky, and sometimes controversial whether a narrow strip is a barrier=? or area of scrub, trees, etc. I prefer a barrier, but wont push my bias here.
ViriatoLusitano (2025-08-03 09:14:51+00:00): Fair enough, from now on I will be careful placing these farm tracks, and will do a review soon of those I've placed so far. Thanks for bringing this up.
mapbear66 (2025-08-13 21:47:32+00:00): Hi,
I see you have been checking in more changes but have not reviewed the multitude of tracks around fields, etc. Please do so very soon. 

Thanks.
mapbear66 (2025-08-14 12:04:50+00:00): For the avoidance of doubt, tracks like this:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1396568307#map=19/51.948253/-8.439933&layers=P

and this is the track I meant to link to originally:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1396568307#map=19/51.948253/-8.439933&layers=P
ViriatoLusitano (2025-08-14 12:08:38+00:00): Hello,

Yes, I am onto it. I am away from home at the moment until the end of August then I can review the tracks.
ViriatoLusitano (2025-08-29 12:59:34+00:00): Hello,

Back home and will will go through them over the next few weeks.

I will delete the circular paths but I would like to keep the tracks leading between farms.
ViriatoLusitano (2025-09-01 12:03:59+00:00): It's done https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171309354
b-jazz (2025-08-01 14:45:07+00:00): RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/874403301

Hey there Corey, 

I just wanted to reach out real quick and let you know that shouldn't have added the fairway tag to the High Knoll hole. The hole is structured as a "multipolygon", meaning that there are multiple piece that define the shape of the hole. In this case, there is an outer boundary around the entire fairway, combined with and excluding the inner boundary of the green. I've fixed this, but wanted to let you know in case you came across a similar hole.
_Madfly (2025-08-20 19:26:51+00:00): Hi, I have reverted this changeset as you made the road that runs through Örebro Resecentrum a zigzag by moving the bus stop nodes to the platforms.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170744157
Makeena (2025-07-31 18:34:09+00:00): Changed nodes around Dällikon
felipeeugenio (2025-07-31 19:47:17+00:00): Hello. This changeset, along with another, took away a lot of tags from these trees. Those are not palms? They were replace by another trees?
What happened?

regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169785072
felipeeugenio (2025-07-31 19:48:01+00:00): The trees were added by you yesterday I noticed.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169785072
cartogravy (2025-08-01 23:22:49+00:00): Hi felipeeugenio, thank you for reaching out.
I added these natural=tree features referencing aerial and ground imagery resources. After uploading, I noticed that I accidentally copied the tags from a nearby tree with specific tagging such as species, genus, leaf_cycle, leaf_type, and height. These extra tags are difficult to fully confirm in resources on the trees I added, so I decided to remove them and only leave the general natural=tree tag. If you or other local mappers have knowledge on the specifics of these trees, please feel free to add them! It would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks, cartogravy
felipeeugenio (2025-08-02 13:10:47+00:00): Ok, I understand. A lot of them seem like palms, I think. Thanks for your time answering.
cartogravy (2025-08-04 22:57:01+00:00): Hey felipeeugenio, 

Thanks for the suggestion. Unfortunately, I don’t have the resources to confirm if these are palm trees but if you know they are in fact palm trees, feel free to tag them. 

I appreciate you reaching out!
spughetti (2025-07-31 18:49:15+00:00): Forgot to add incline.....

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169785554
NeisBot (2025-07-31 18:53:35+00:00): Hi Daylton Campos, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 87% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 5 highway(s)
- 3 natural(s)
- 2 landuse(')

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=169785642
NeisReview (2025-08-01 06:27:04+00:00): Thank you for your private message and confirming that your deletions were intentional.
valaise (2025-08-01 18:31:28+00:00): Thanks for the quick updates, was just checking if these recent changes were added.
TheBestIdea (2025-08-05 16:35:20+00:00): Sure thing. Unhappy to have to make the changes, but don't want people thinking this segment is still protected.
kamilbogacki (2025-08-05 23:18:32+00:00): Dodając tego typu nazwy staraj się korzystać z klucza "place=", a nazwy dodawać na węzłach. Dodawanie nazw na landuse dla większych osiedli jest bezużyteczne (landuse będzie podzielone w przyszłości), jedynie małe kameralne osiedla są w ten sposób oznaczane.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:place
mueschel (2025-08-05 09:52:20+00:00): In welche Richtung darf hier nicht gefahren werden?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37670256
ironspock (2025-08-05 15:09:53+00:00): Kraftfahrzeuge dürfen nicht in Richtung Norden fahren (DE:260); deshalb "motor_vehicle:both_ways:backward = no" gesetzt (siehe auch Hinweis mit Foto, solange noch verfügbar: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4856339; sowie Knoten https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1878377094 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1849698281)
mueschel (2025-08-05 15:19:51+00:00): Woher kommt das "both_ways"? 

Wenn im Norden kein Schild steht, dann wäre das auch nur eine Abbiegebeschränkung weil Fahrzeuge jederzeit wenden dürfen.
Vincentdesgms (2025-09-14 08:55:39+00:00): Bonjour, je viens de constater que le parcours du chemin de Compostelle entre Sarreguemines et Hérapel a été supprimé de la relation 6011566. Par conséquent, cette partie du chemin ne figure plus dans OSM. Certes ce tracé n'est pas en Sarre, mais il devrait figurer dans OSM. Pouvez-vous faire "réapparaitre" ce tracé?
Cordialement, Vincent
StC (2025-09-14 19:27:17+00:00): Bonjour,
l'itinéraire jacquaire entre Sarreguemines et Hérapel apparaît toujours dans Waymarkedtrails. Sur quellle carte a-t-il disparu ?
Vincentdesgms (2025-09-15 07:22:06+00:00): Bonjour, 
Waymarkedtrails n'est qu'une réutilisation des données de OSM. Je suppose que Waymarkedtrails n'a pas été mis à jour depuis votre modification. 
Le tracé manque dans la base OSM, il était dans la relation 6011566. Ce n'est pas clair pour vous?
StC (2025-09-16 13:37:50+00:00): Bonjour !
Waymarkedtrails est mis à jour en quelques minutes. C'est le principal outil de suivi de qualité que nous utilisons actuellement au sein du groupe OSM Plein Air pour faire le suivi des itinéraires. C'est pour cela que j'essaye de comprendre ce que vous voulez dire par "le tracé manque dans OSM", car en effet cela n'est pas clair pour moi. En l'occurrence, la relation 11916619 est présente dans la base OSM, et est incluse dans une super-relation qui assure que cette section est bien identifiée comme partie d'un itinéraire jacquaire. Donc je repose ma question : sur quelle(s) carte(s) cet itinéraire a-t-il disparu ? Est-ce un problème de tracé ? de nom ? de symbole ?
Vincentdesgms (2025-09-17 10:18:18+00:00): Bonjour, c'est parfois difficile de se comprendre. Je ne parle que de OSM. Je vais exprimer le problème différemment : la relation 11916619 (Altheim –  Hérapel) a été amputée du parcours Sarreguemines - Hérapel. Est-ce plus clair ? 
Le parcours Sarreguemines - Hérapel n'apparait plus dans aucune relation jacquaire.
Le parcours manquant doit correspondre à peu de chose près à la Relation : GR 5G Sud (11916619). Ce chemin passe à deux pas de chez moi.
pyrog (2025-09-17 13:19:10+00:00): Bonjour,
J'ai vérifié ça  correspond bien à la section GR 5G Sud qui est incluse à la fois dans le GR mais aussi dans le chemin jacquaire Via Regia.

Cordialement
Yves - Groupe OSM Plein Air

Voir panneau "Partie de" dans Waymarked Trails :
https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=11916619&type=relation&map=11.0/49.1319/6.9618