piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2023-03-10 17:54:38+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133524733
Frans S (2023-03-10 17:47:48+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, at random or as requested. 



Highway tagging.

Please use the rules how to tag highways on this project according to this wiki.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highways

Read also the remarks about tagging of tracks in the instructions.
Best regards and keep mapping
General info:
Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133524740
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2023-03-13 14:13:01+00:00): Der mangler et fysisk tag på vej 1153289766
Frans S (2023-03-10 17:44:36+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, during the validation process.

I noticed that you are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.

We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. Just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.

Please map each building accurate over the rooflines.

Square each rectangular building with the Q key.

Nodes of buildings may NOT  connect to other buildings or features.

The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 

Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.


See also this document:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/11PsAW0bzUZHbS8YnbaFzqOYhJY7tSPYG/view?usp=share_link


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133524879
Frans S (2023-03-10 17:45:26+00:00): Another issue:
You also mapped residential areas. No problem, but don't connect nodes of it to highways. Here it became a mess. Roads nodes were moved aside and didn't follow the trace.
Has to be corrected by a validator
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133524879
Monstrofil (2023-03-10 16:17:03+00:00): I would like to explain this change.

I know a lot of people really love OSM and do whatever they think is the best for project and data that it contains, but in this particular case the existance of this "border" does not really mean anything in real world.

Russia claimed for a lot bigger territory at the beginning, including 70% of Kharkiv region, a lot of Mykolaiv region and so on (check https://deepstatemap.live/ if you are interested in the location where there vere the battles). Less then a month till "referendum", russia stated that they wouldn't ever leave Balaklia and Izum

De-facto (you love those words, ha?), there is no border where this line was added, the whole territory is recognized worldwide (with little exceptions, sure) as part of Ukraine.

Spend you energy in better ways, e,g. improving address database or adding new buildings.

Have a nice day.
gurglypipe (2023-03-10 17:04:01+00:00): Hi, thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap.

Furness hospital is already mapped as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/588483640, so if it’s not showing up on the app you’re using, then you should get in touch with the authors of the app, as there’s likely a bug in the app.

There is not a problem with the map data in OpenStreetMap, as far as I can tell.

I’m going to remove your addition because the hospital is already mapped. Thanks
gurglypipe (2023-03-10 17:05:13+00:00): Reverted as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133526828
HirschKauz (2023-03-11 12:35:19+00:00): Hi fabue2  
'neu' ist nicht sehr aussagekräftig. Bitte lies hier: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Good_changeset_comments 
Grüße
Rico557 (2023-03-20 10:40:30+00:00): Точка https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10726163591 будет удалена , т.к. дублирует точку - https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1059745513
berndw (2023-03-10 17:28:40+00:00): Was möchtest du mit diesen Änderungen bewirken?

Dadurch das du die bisher als Gesamtlänge erfassten Weinberge gelöscht hast, ist die Historie und die Verlinkung z.B. des Sonnenbergs bei Wikipedia verloren gegangen.

Die Wege aus den Flächen aussparen ist bei regulären Straßen sinnvoll,  aber die Wege innerhalb der Weinlagen gehören zum Weinberg und führen durchaus die einzelne Flächen ohne diese aufzuteilen. 
Brachen innerhalb kann man auch anders erfassen. 

Überdenken deinen Ansatz bitte noch einmal.
berndw (2023-03-11 08:27:51+00:00): Antwortest Du irgendwann?

Am Sonnenberg hast du Flächen separat erfasst, die sich einzig durch die Ausrichtung der Rebstöcke unterscheiden.

Oder kannst Du anhand von Luftbildern erkennen, was dort außerdem anders ist?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133525504#map=17/50.55134/7.13550&layers=N
Msiipola (2023-03-15 07:20:18+00:00): Hi! Here you have added buildings which intersects buildings.
You can't use Bing as reference without do position calibration. Which I suspect have not been done.
I fix these error, but remember, don't put buildings over highways.
Базич (2023-03-15 09:31:46+00:00): hello, sorry for using bing, didn't know that the background didn't match and needs to be adjusted, unfortunately maxar premium is not available for use in my country
Msiipola (2023-03-15 11:47:31+00:00): There is a layer from the Swedish road authorities (Trafikverket Road Network), which is available from osm, which should be used to calibrate other images.
map per (2023-03-11 19:07:42+00:00): Hallo tschlierbach,

was ist hier mit artwork_subject=concrete gemeint?
(Hilfreicher Wikiartikel: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:artwork%20subject?uselang=de)

Danke und viele Grüße
map per
tschlierbach (2023-03-11 19:28:12+00:00): Rupprecht Geiger ist Vertreter der konkreten Kunst:
Er wollte ein gerundetes Oval schaffen, also hat er es so benannt.
map per (2023-03-12 09:05:35+00:00): Ok, danke. Hab mich nur gewundert weil dieses Kunstwerk das einzige konkrete Kunstwerk in der Datenbank ist.
scarapella (2023-03-19 17:30:28+00:00): Hi Bkissin,

Thank you for our contribution to open streetmap.  I noticed this changeset for 2 reasons.  First it seems like you use multiple values for landuse.  I don't know that this is a common convention as the renderers don't know how to show this area. It also flags an osmose QA rule.
https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/#zoom=14&lat=45.15299&lon=-68.27428&item=xxxx&level=1%2C2%2C3&issue_uuid=24d6f789-d869-dacb-d6cd-19d1adcf0ade

Secondly, it seems like there are some duplicate segments flagged on osmi
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-68.27309&lat=45.15263&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

cheers,
scarapella
scarapella (2023-03-19 17:34:26+00:00): you can also see how your edit removed some of the wetlands previously drawn such as 

https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1111192735

so overall this changeset degrades the information that was previously on OSM.   I would recommend reverting this changeset.
Bkissin (2023-03-22 15:28:23+00:00): Hi @scarapella! Sorry about the issue. It was an attempt to create the natural wood feature around the existing wetland features, but obviously it didn't come out the right way. Happy to take care of that. It's been a while since I've had to revert a changeset. How do I do it again?
scarapella (2023-03-22 16:09:51+00:00): Hello Bkissin,

No worries.  An BTW if it's easier for you to just repair, no problem at all. I just proposed a revert as it's what I would have done, but then you do lose the work you put into defining the wooded area. 

The (only) way I know how to revert (which is inevitably because i've screwed up something :D ) is to use the revert ui
http://revert.osmz.ru/

Cheers,
Sean
Leo Slager (2023-03-10 20:32:03+00:00): Kijk hier maar eens naar Sandelingeweg 13.
De uitstulping die je daar intekent zou een overkapping kunnen zijn, terwijl de BAG en omtrek op maaiveld niveau laat zien:
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?geometry.x=100904.31671875&geometry.y=429069.73484375&zoomlevel=7&objectId=0597100000212846&detailsObjectId=

Als je ter plaatse vast stelt dat jouw omtrek juist is, kun je de BAG verzoeken dat te corrigeren. Met het blauwe potloodje links in het scherm kun je een terugmelding doen en dan gaat hopelijk de gemeente aan de slag om de omtrek te corrigeren.
Daarna kan die nieuwe omtrek weer geïmporteerd worden in OSM.
Lijkt een omslachtige procedure, maar levert voor het gros van de gebouwen een correcte weergave op.
Specimen0180 (2023-03-10 20:38:41+00:00): Ah, dat is dus waar alle data vandaan komt, ik vroeg mij al af wat "BAG" was

Dan zal de veranderingen die verwerkt zijn omgekeerd worden, ik zal verwachten dat veel aanpassingen die ik geprobeerd heb te maken zal worden terug gedraaid worden. Ik was nog niet op de hoogte hoe dit allemaal werkte.
Commodoortje (2023-03-11 14:42:35+00:00): " Ik was nog niet op de hoogte hoe dit allemaal werkte."

Alle begrip hiervoor, probeer je kennis te verhogen door te vragen (bv op het forum) en in te lezen.
OSM is een porceleinkast, waar niet door heen gebanjerd zou moeten worden. 

Lees: Niet aanpassen omdat het kan, maar om OSM te verbeteren.
Frans S (2023-03-10 17:39:12+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 
The black spot, next to a building is mostly the shadow of that building. Don't include that in your mapping.
Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133525754
Jordi MF (2023-03-13 21:12:18+00:00): Hola Heespe375,
Una pregunta. El Mirador del Borell està ben anomenat o hauria de ser Mirador de Borrell, amb doble "r", igual que el nom del barranc?
Gràcies,
Jordi
Heespe_375 (2023-03-13 21:17:34+00:00): Segons el que he vist a imatge sobre els senyals indicadors, panells indicadors, tríptics divulgatius sobre la ruta, tot el que continua nom de Borrell té que anar amb 2 r.
Heespe_375 (2023-03-13 21:19:02+00:00): Ara ho canviaré
NorthCrab_upload (2023-03-10 17:50:23+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2263194839
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10726238637

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Miętowa":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10726238654
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10726238655
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10726238656
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10726238657
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10726238658
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10726238659

"Miodowa":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10726238660
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10726238661
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10726238662
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10726238663
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10726238664
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10726238665
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10726238666
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10726238667
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10726238668
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/262294883
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/262294925
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/262295139
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/943386790
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/947880179
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/947880198
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/947880219
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/947880222
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/947880259
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/947880266
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/947880271

"Ogrodowa":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10726238683
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10726238684
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10726238685

"Sportowa":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10726238702

"Technologiczna":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/887507010

"Spacerowa":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/918665192
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/918665193
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/918665195

"Makowa":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/983292078

"Słoneczna":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/985855238
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/985855239

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2023-03-10 17:00:21+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o miejscowości.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10726153202

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Frans S (2023-03-10 17:52:45+00:00): Hello. I reviewed your mappings here.
A bit sloppy as I may say so,
Not that accurate mapped and buildings hardly squared, despite the imagery is very clear to map from.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133526487
SekeRob (2023-03-10 16:57:40+00:00): Yes indeed it was a cemetery in not download mapping data.
user_5359 (2023-03-12 08:01:05+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You didn't any building. The only key i a hashtag (don't use a hashtag as OSM key!)
snakeplants (2023-03-10 17:00:13+00:00): Correction: Source used was Maxar SecureWatch Imagery 2022-10-13, Staðfangaskrá
Frans S (2023-03-10 17:57:03+00:00): Hello again.
Here are your mappings a bit sloppy. Lots of buildings not squared or not accurate.
Please take the time to map precisely.
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133526665
Leo Slager (2023-03-10 20:40:36+00:00): Laat je door al mijn commentaar niet weerhouden om door te gaan met het verbeteren van de kaart.
Het begint op de snelcursus te klijken die ikzelf als beginner ook kreeg van een meer ervaren mapper :-)
Soms is het ook goed om eerst iets op te zoeken in de wiki.
De collection times van de brievenbus volgt bijvoorbeeld het format van opening_hours:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours

Dus Mo-Fr 17:00

Kijk je daar zelf nog even naar ?
Leo Slager (2023-03-10 20:45:15+00:00): Dan zijn er ook nog van die afspraken in de NL community: Gegevens van bedrijven, winkels, restaurants worden niet op de omtrek van het gebouw gezet. We taggen dat bij op de al bestaande adress node, zodat adressen maar éénmalig in de database staan.
Commodoortje (2023-03-11 14:09:09+00:00): Ook ik kijk even mee, probeer niet te snel veel te willen verbeteren, maar probeer je iets te verdiepen waarom.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133554717
jngt (2023-03-10 18:43:00+00:00): Hi muecke73, I cannot really identify the road you added on the sat-image. Please review again and if you are not really sure neither I propose you rather change it to a path or even remove it completely. I'll be adding a note to HOTOSM, too, for potential other assessments. Thanks, jngt
bxl-forever (2023-03-10 20:59:41+00:00): Hello,

I see you requested a review.

Nice to add this.  Cool to have a LUG on the map!

I am not sure whether "amenity=community_centre" and "community_centre=club_home" are appropriate.

I would tend to only have club=linux on the node.  But though it will be searchable, there will be no icon on the main map.

Another issue is the location.  If you put the address as 121 we’ll have a duplicate address with this one which you moved a few years ago: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2622408355 ← and indeed the location of that node matches UrbIS data.

Are you sure Caldarium is in the correct building?  Shouldn’t it there be near the node with housenumber 121?  If that is the right building, I suggest removing the address entirely on Caldarium.
HgO (2023-03-11 11:49:02+00:00): Hello !

Yes, thanks for your review :)

The venue is not just a LUG, as other activities are organized, although currently we focus on activities around the free software theme. We also organize parties, non-profit organization meetings, workshop, etc. For instance, it's also the HQ of a non-profit organization (Neutrinet). That's why I thought that amenity=community_centre would fit here.

The address at 121 is a private house, but Caldarium is in a large greenhouse next to the house. So yes, it's not the same building, but same address. No problem for removing the address on Caldarium node :)
adrianojbr (2023-03-10 19:25:58+00:00): Olá, gabriella ottmann!

name deve somente ser preenchido se houver um nome, sem utilizar para descrições ou algo do gênero.

Abaço!
Frans S (2023-03-10 18:22:30+00:00): Hello.  Please do not upload every single building but collect them and upload them when you are finished or decided to stop.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133527685
Jon118 (2023-03-10 23:36:14+00:00): Please remove this.  Use updated
marc__marc (2023-04-10 20:18:01+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1153310559
que veux dire surface=surface ?
Cordialement,
Marc
Yod4z (2023-04-12 09:05:17+00:00): desole fausse saisie j'ai du vouloir saisir surface et ca la saisie en valeur de cle
Frans S (2023-03-10 18:21:13+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, during the validation process.

I noticed that you are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.

We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. Just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.

Please map each building accurate over the rooflines.

Square each rectangular building with the Q key.

Nodes of buildings may NOT  connect to other buildings or features.

The shadow of a building is not a part of the building.  Neither the yards next to it.
On a school, you included the playground in your mapping

Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.


See also this document:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/11PsAW0bzUZHbS8YnbaFzqOYhJY7tSPYG/view?usp=share_link


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133527942
Jordi MF (2023-03-13 20:51:21+00:00): Hola Miguel,
Gracias por mejorar los datos de OpenStreetMap. Veo que usas las ortofotos Maxar para editar. Te recomiendo que uses las imágenes del PNOA porque son las que mayor precisión aportan a la hora de mapear carreteras, pistas y sendas.
Saludos,
Jordi
miguelpicher (2023-03-14 14:15:58+00:00): Hola Jordi: Bueno, utilizo al mismo tiempo el Strava Heat Mapa para confirmar que es una senda/pista por la que se puede pasar. Pero no encuentro en el menú que se pueda visualizar los mapas de PNOA

Saludos
Leo Slager (2023-03-10 21:05:22+00:00): De bushalte bestaat uit twee elementen:
stop_position, vastgemaakt aan de way
en 
highway=bus_stop in combinatie met public_transport=platform
op een node op de plaats van de haltepaal. Op deze node kunnen de overige tags behorende bij de halte worden toegevoegd.
De OV tagging is een open zenuw:
De community is het er niet over eens. Sommigen nemen de stop_position en het platform op in de route relatie. Anderen nemen alleen het platform op in de routerelatie.
Overigens gelijk een waarschuwing. Met de editor iD kun je geen routerelaties bewerken, dat gaat altijd fout en dan laat je een gebroken route achter. Helaas is er een welhaast oneindig aantal OV-, fiets-, en wandel routes in NL. En elke keer als we met de editor iD een weg opknippen worden er routerelaties beschadigd :-(
Als je serieus met routerelaties aan de slag wilt stap dan over op de editor JOSM. Het is even wennen, maar binnen 1 a 2 weken wil je niet meer terug naar iD.
Specimen0180 (2023-03-10 21:11:35+00:00): Ik zie dat ik geprobeerd heb een opdracht op te pakken dat ver boven mijn kennis was, de bushaltes zijn samen met de asfaltering verplaatst.

Ze hebben het bushaltehokje achtergelaten, maar wel de bus stop verplaatst. Ik denk dat ik maar moet accepteren dat ik honderd berichten zal ontvangen als ik wakker word morgen en maar wat tutorials volg voor ik de volgende verandering doorvoer.

Bedankt dat je op een vriendelijke manier deze informatie aan mij kan toelichten Leo.. Ik waardeer het enorm.
Leo Slager (2023-03-10 21:28:57+00:00): Tja, het is een oerwoud van conventies, hele en halve afspraken in het forum, soms wel en soms niet vastgelegd in de wiki.
Ervaring en kennis wordt alleen maar opgebouwd door het te doen.
En opzoeken in de wiki natuurlijk :-)

Veel plezier met verder mappen.
Frans S (2023-03-10 18:17:10+00:00): Hello Thanks fro mapping on this project
About Highway tagging.

Please use the rules how to tag highways on this project according to this wiki.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highways

Read also the remarks about tagging of tracks in the instructions.
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133528147
Frans S (2023-03-12 16:00:03+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
Do not cluster buildings.
Shadow next to a buildings is not a part of  a building. 
Many buildings are not fair squared.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133528147
CurlingMan13 (2023-03-11 22:55:01+00:00): Buildings are not square.  Please use "Q" to square them.