piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Steven Whitehouse (2026-01-10 10:57:20+00:00): Hi,

Apologies if I've done this the wrong way. That appeared to be the easiest way to model the boundaries that belong to multiple relations. The wiki appears to imply that is the best option for more complex areas, but maybe this is a case where it is not giving me the whole picture...

I could only work out how to use closed ways in the case that the boundary was not shared with other fields. Please let me know if there is a better explanation that I've missed somewhere!

Steve.
ceirios (2026-01-10 15:05:59+00:00): Hi there,

I'm not quite sure where the "boundaries that belong to multiple relations" are coming from here. Coed Wenallt was a multipolygon made of closed ways as it's one named forest split by the road. 

Gluing areas/closed ways together is the preferred way to map here - could you share the wiki page you're reading perhaps?
Steven Whitehouse (2026-01-10 15:31:50+00:00): I've looked a number of pages:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Area
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Area/The_Future_of_Areas
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:landuse

and likely a lot more besides. From what I could tell there seemed to be some debate around the subject of areas in general. There seems to be two possible solutions (trying to avoid using "ways" in too many contexts!). The closed ways solution, which seems problematic when two areas have a common boundary, and the multipolygon solution which seemed to allow me to do what I was looking for. It is possible that I've missed something about closed ways that allows solving that particular issue neatly though. I'm sure we can fix it, if that is the case.

Steve.
habi (2026-01-10 20:37:45+00:00): Ciao Roman

Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap!
Schön machst du hier mit und hilfst, die Karte und die Kartendaten zu pflegen.

Wenn du das Ladenlokal übernommen hast, kannst du einfach die 'falschen' Daten ersetzten, so bleibt die sog. Historie erhalten.

Ich hab' das für dich in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177075393 erledigt.

E Gruess us Bärn,
Habi
eggie (2026-01-10 11:07:44+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
bartovx (2026-01-10 16:10:37+00:00): Cześć ale to nie jest składowisko odpadów, tylko hałdy, już nieczynne.  W tym miejscu nie ma zakładu przetwarzania odpadów.
NeuerLars (2026-04-20 20:44:06+00:00): Hey, the Kindergarten 30 Schönauweg (1465810187) doesn't exist anymore. It has been torn down. Reverted it in #181601020
NeuerLars (2026-04-20 20:44:28+00:00): Hey, the Kindergarten "30 Schönauweg (1465810187)" doesn't exist anymore. It has been torn down. Reverted it in #181601020. Thanks for your other edits!
NeuerLars (2026-04-20 20:44:56+00:00): Hey, the Kindergarten "30 Schönauweg (1465810187)" doesn't exist anymore. It has been torn down. Reverted it in #181601020. Thanks for your other edits!
Kamil Kalata (2026-01-10 10:48:11+00:00): Ortofotomapy czasowe użyte w tym zestawie zmian składały się ze zdjęć wykonanych w dniach 13 września 2023 roku oraz 21 czerwca 2024 roku.
nevw (2026-01-28 22:15:50+00:00): There multiple osmi errors in this area that need remapping to correct.
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=131.70242&lat=-1.44674&zoom=14
nevw (2026-03-06 22:35:41+00:00): Hi, these areas are still in error.
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=131.69978&lat=-1.45419&zoom=14
Should I delete this area
Dimitar155 (2026-01-10 11:09:06+00:00): wikidata тага прави връзката с wikimedia commons и wikipedia. Не е нужно да правите връзки от OSM към commons/wikipedia, тъй като имената често биват променяни и стават неактуални. Идентификаторите в уикиданни обаче са постоянни и не се променят.
Anonymous36863 (2026-01-10 11:15:32+00:00): ОК
Anonymous36863 (2026-01-10 11:13:51+00:00): ?
Dimitar155 (2026-01-10 11:57:15+00:00): wikipedia тага е за училището, дърветата по подразбиране са на кота 0. Също не съм видял безплатно (или платено) дърво.
Anonymous36863 (2026-01-10 13:29:46+00:00): Това не просто е дърво, а туристическа атракция - хората искат да знаят дали трябва да платят за да го посетят.
Dimitar155 (2026-01-10 13:37:58+00:00): Ако достъпа беше платен, вероятно нямаше да е само за дървото. Вероятно би имало и други "туристически" неща около него и би имало такса вход за самия парк. Пример в тази посока е парк "Мини България" във Велико Търново.
Dimitar155 (2026-01-10 13:45:17+00:00): Може би тага който търсите е denotation=natural_monument или denotation=landmark?
Fraxi (2026-01-10 12:49:43+00:00): Имам въпрос, който не е свързан с конкретната промяна и район, но със сходен смисъл. addr:district deprecated ли е? Ето например тук попаднах на употребата му: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1298995275#map=18/42.628321/23.330830
Dimitar155 (2026-01-10 13:04:03+00:00): По-скоро не, но в случая адресите са отбелязани по особен начин...
Fraxi (2026-01-10 16:19:46+00:00): Трябваше да кажа "нужен", не "остарял"(deprecated). Използва се. Благодаря за вниманието!
murmeldin (2026-01-13 13:34:37+00:00): Hey, nur zur Info:
Hab mal im Changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177180205 die Addressen korrigiert. Hattest die in dem Änderungssatz https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177056995 vertauscht :)
dypa (2026-01-11 14:54:53+00:00): Вы повтороно вносите ошибочную правку без проверки на местности, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173755538. Пожалуйста изучите https://osm.wiki/RU:Tag:natural%3Dshrubbery перед внесением правок.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177099736
Thibault Rommel (2026-01-11 15:02:32+00:00): Natural=shrubbery is NOT to be used on nodes.
Please take a look at the wiki page.
dypa (2026-01-12 09:30:10+00:00): 👍 fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177128617

Please use more informative messages for changes, as there is a big difference "update shrubbery" between "Natural=shrubbery is NOT to be used on nodes.
Please take a look at the wiki page."
Thibault Rommel (2026-01-12 11:47:26+00:00): Very well, thanks.
mweper (2026-01-10 17:18:24+00:00): Hello. These are internal passageways in an informal neighborhood; they are often very narrow for vehicles and, above all, can be quite dangerous to enter. I think the category "highway=service + service=alley" is better.
WanakaLake (2026-01-13 17:06:11+00:00): Hello mweper. Thank you for reaching out and providing your insight on these informal ways. I will go ahead and reclassify to highway=service with service=alley tagging. Happy mapping!
gps-newcomer (2026-03-29 16:59:07+00:00): You probably deleted the path to and on the railway embankment because it was of poor quality. Still, it was accessible so far and should have perhaps only received a lower quality of surface. I have walked the path more often. Unfortunately, we often don’t have better trails for hiking in the area!
Rainero (2026-03-21 21:32:37+00:00): Revert mit changeset/180227029
(unzulässige Quelle)
bxl-forever (2026-01-10 13:32:10+00:00): Hello, and welcome to OSM.

Thanks for spotting that a house number was missing here.

I fixed your edit because you forgot to write the Dutch version of the street name, which is mandatory.  Also, we no longer repeat the post code and the town name on every single address in Belgium, because OSM is a geographical database, which already has this information from container areas.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13446092134

Happy mapping.
Fizzie-DWG (2026-01-25 03:46:16+00:00): DWG revert - apparent undiscussed import

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177668049
eggie (2026-01-10 16:02:18+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Fraxi (2026-01-26 15:14:26+00:00): Hi
is https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11242931333 a shop from the chain "Минимарт"(https://mini-mart.bg/). If yes, this shop is rather a convenience shop. 
"One suggestion for distinguishing between a supermarket and a convenience shop, is that a supermarket is large enough to use trolleys." (from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dsupermarket). Are there any trolleys in this shop?
trial (2026-01-12 15:19:31+00:00): Bonjour, bienvenu dans OpenStreetMap.
"d" n'est pas un bon commentaire de modifications.
La BD Ortho IGN ne montre pas un tel aménagement cyclable (et encore moins bidirectionnel).
Merci donc de supprimer cette information fausse.
Par contre il manque les bandes cyclables de la Rue Paul Bollet dans le coin.
N. B. : le PCRS Raster est plus précis, mais ici plus vieux.
Cocow (2026-01-12 16:44:50+00:00): Bonjour, en fait c'est la liaison pour tourner à gauche qui n'est pas faite. Il n'est pas nécessaire de faire le tour du rond point car il y a un passage piéton-vélo qui permet d'aller tout droit et à gauche.
Je vais supprimer ma liaison et mettre une connexion avec la rue Paul Bollet à la place.
Cocow (2026-01-12 16:51:18+00:00): Ah non, en fait le problème était que la piste menait à un aménagement unidirectionnel (la bande cyclable du rond point) sur la carte, alors que l'aménagement bidirectionnel se poursuit là où est indiqué un chemin piéton.
Superadlen (2026-01-10 15:17:10+00:00): merci
coatix (2026-01-10 13:12:44+00:00): Ah, super, danke, kannte ich noch nicht! :)
eggie (2026-01-10 12:44:42+00:00): Dag Rob.. probeer op de adresnode bij te taggen.
Mvg
eggie
Rob Hooft (2026-01-24 17:22:24+00:00): Ik heb wat geprobeerd, kan wel een aantal dingen als een naam en een website aan de adresnode toevoegen, maar daarmee wordt het geen kringloopcentrum. Moet ik daarvoor het type "Adres" wijzigen?
eggie (2026-01-24 17:49:29+00:00): Nee...   Het is nu goed. Ik heb je info samengevoegd met die adresnode. 
In het vervolg kun je gewoon eerst de adresnode selecteren en dan voeg je alle eigenschappen toe.



MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-01-10 12:47:34+00:00): Tip..
Je kunt op nodes verbonden met de weg toevoegen barrier=block met motor_vehicle = no
Mvg
eggie
eggie (2026-01-10 16:13:04+00:00): Nooit een welkomstmail ontvangen, maar veel langer een account.. Bij deze alsnog.. Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Rob Hooft (2026-01-10 19:56:48+00:00): Bedankt!
Nakaner-repair (2026-03-06 15:53:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179453142 where the changeset comment was: "Revert changeset/177060355 due to vandalism (moving boundaries is no valid reason, see source tags at changeset 176983663). Revert changeset 177075766 in order to reduce the number of conflicts and due to partially mechanical nature."
Nakaner (2026-03-06 16:11:52+00:00): Hallo,

beim Zusammenstellen eines weltweiten Datensatzes mit Verwaltungsgrenzen ist mir aufgefallen, dass dieser Änderungssatz eine Lücke in die flächenhafte Abdeckung mit AL8-Polygonen gerissen hat.

Leider sah ich mich genötigt, deinen Änderungssatz rückgängig zu machen.

Warum hast du meinen Änderungssatz einfach mit dem Kommentar "[…] wegen Verschiebung von Amts- und Gemeindegrenzen" revertiert?

Warum hast du mich nicht per Kommentar in der Diskussion meines Änderungssatzes informiert?

Warum hast du beim Revert nicht wenigstens das alte AL8-Polygon für das gemeindefreie Gebiet wiederhergestellt?

Du hast doch die zu revertierenden Änderungssätze selbst ermittelt. Dabei hattest du doch Gelegenheit sie zu sichten, oder? Waren dir meine Quellen (Bekanntmachungen mit Aktenzeichen) waren samt URL, wo man sie noch immer herunterladen kann, nicht gut genug. Sie stehen, wie es sich gehört, als Tags am Änderungssatz.

Ich habe vor dem Hochladen vom Validator alle modifizierten Objekte prüfen lassen. Alle beteiligten Relationen waren komplett im Änderungssatz geladen (oder habe ich eine vergessen?). Damit war auch die Gültigkeitsprüfung der Polygone sichergestellt. JOSM prüft keine Überlappungsfreiheit. Dies habe ich manuell gemacht. Es kann natürlich sein, dass einem da immer mal ein Fehler durch die Lappen geht. Anstatt den kompletten Änderungssatz unvollständig (!) zu revertieren, hättest du den Defekt auch beheben können.

OSM ist ein Gemeinschaftsprojekt. Dazu gehört auch Kommunikation. Es ist Teil der guten fachlichen Praxis, per Kommentar in der Änderungssatzdiskussion denjenigen zu benachrichtigen, dessen Änderungen rückgängig gemacht worden sind. Anlässe, davon abzusehen, wie z.B. große Anzahl an revertierten Änderungssätzen auf einmal, bekannter Vandale oder laufender Editwar, treffen hier nicht zu, oder?

Zur Begründung, warum ich auch den Änderungssatz 177075766 ebenfalls revertiert habe, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177075766

Bitte sieh von einem Editwar ab. Wenn du mit meinem Revert nicht einverstanden bist, steht es dir frei, dich darüber zu beschweren. Du kannst dies entweder per E-Mail an data@osmfoundation.org tun. Oder du startest eine Diskussion im OSM-Forum.

Viele Grüße

Michael
JanWendt (2026-03-17 09:16:18+00:00): @Nakaner ich hatte es damals auch nicht verstanden und deshalb in www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177061308 nachgefragt da findest du eine Begründung.
SekeRob (2026-01-11 05:56:51+00:00): Hi, you changed the forest cutlines, I. e. the way represenring the space m
made in the forsst
 thru which the power lines are constructed into the power lines. No, those have to be mapped separately with nodes where the real power towers/poles are, which is often very difficult to see in aerials. I'll be reverting your change. Then you can map the wires separately.

Ciao
jacopo1604 (2026-01-11 11:05:54+00:00): Hi, thanks for the explanation and sorry for the mistake.
I misunderstood how forest cutlines and power lines should be mapped.
I appreciate the clarification and I’ll be more careful in the future to keep different features mapped separately.
Thanks for taking the time to explain.
DaveF (2026-01-10 18:48:23+00:00): Don't join buildings to landuse polygons.
Ensure imagery is correctly aligned before adding data.
Blaiseo (2026-01-11 09:53:55+00:00): Thanks for comment. I was looking for option to turn off the land use polygons whilst editing the buildings, as they do get in the way, but couldn't find it?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-01-11 17:43:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 177106208 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed mechanical edit; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19423
palkor (2026-01-10 13:24:45+00:00): Cześć
W drodze na Maciejową udało mi się znaleźć i dodać wszystkie stacje Drogi Krzyżowej. Prosiłbym o przejrzenie i pomoc w poprawnym dodaniu ich do mapy.
Pozdrawiam,
Paweł_M (2026-01-11 10:48:37+00:00): Cześć, dzięki za kontrybucję. Do stacji dodałeś sam znacznik "name", więc z tagów nie wynika co to jest. Jeśli stacje są w formie krzyży można dodać do nich tag "historic=wayside_cross", a jeżeli są w formie kapliczek to tag "historic=wayside_shrine". Wtedy również będą się renderować na mapie w postaci symbolu. Mógłbyś również uspójnić pisownię, bo czasem słowa w nazwie są pisane małą literą, a czasem dużą.
pozdrawiam Paweł
Paweł_M (2026-01-11 10:49:18+00:00): Ja tak otagowałem stacje drogi krzyżowej w Leżajsku. Jako wayside_shrine
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-01-11 17:43:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 177106208 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed mechanical edit; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19423
Fraxi (2026-01-10 19:25:35+00:00): Здравейте! Ако сте сигурен, че сградите, за които сте сменили стойностите от =construction на =apartments, са завършени, можете да махнете и строителните площадки(landuse=construction), в които попадат. Ако е приложимо.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-01-11 17:43:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 177106208 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed mechanical edit; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19423
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-01-11 17:43:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 177106208 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed mechanical edit; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19423
JanWendt (2026-01-14 09:29:24+00:00): The source states that Buchholz forest district was not simply deleted but incorporated into Bark, Heidmühlen and Rickling.
se7q38 (2026-01-15 11:03:17+00:00): @JanWendt: Lies das Dokument sorgfältig und versuche den Text  zu verstehen.
JanWendt (2026-01-15 16:11:37+00:00): @se7q38 Du hast zwar die Auflösung vorgenommen aber die Eingemeindung der Flurstücke ausgelassen. Wenn ich mir Bark (422879), Heidmühlen (423152) und Rickling (423151) anschaue hast du die Eingemeindung die durchgeführt wurde sogar revertiert. Warum? Soll der aufgelöste Forstgutsbezirk mit dessen Flurstücken etwa nicht wie im Dokument eingemeindet werden und stattdessen verwaist bleiben?
se7q38 (2026-01-16 16:42:02+00:00): @JanWendt: Wer eine aktuelle Datenquelle mit OSM-verträglicher Lizenz hat, kann sich sofort an die Änderung der Gemeindegrenzen gemäß Amtsblatt machen
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-01-11 17:43:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 177106208 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed mechanical edit; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19423
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-01-11 17:43:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 177106208 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed mechanical edit; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19423
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-01-11 17:43:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 177106208 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed mechanical edit; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19423
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-01-11 17:43:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 177106208 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed mechanical edit; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19423
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-01-11 17:43:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 177106208 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed mechanical edit; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19423
trial (2026-01-12 15:34:33+00:00): Si c'est Étienne Crespin qui a repris la boutique, il a dû la reprendre aussi en breton (name:br), de plus on passe usuellement le name précédent en old_name car la boutique peut être connue un certain temps par son ancien nom.
Pour les sites regroupant plusieurs magasins, on essaye de mettre la page spécifique :
https://www.maison-crespin.fr/nos-boulangeries/c-16.html#16
Et en France on évite de dupliquer les adresses. Le 1 Rue de Larmor existait déjà et est bien placé.
Pour les POI on préfère les préfixes contact: aux préfixes addr:
democat (2026-01-25 09:46:40+00:00): Hey there! I'd like to ask why you counted lanes that weren't fully formed (you counted lanes from when they start emerging from the curb, not from when they're done emerging), which conflicts with this section in the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lanes#Street
selillium (2026-01-25 11:46:02+00:00): A terminal case of me misinterpreting or not RTFM, apparently.
Mapping_Maślice (2026-06-30 11:54:06+00:00): The area within way/1373301520 has been retagged incompletely, with combination of tags that means nothing, not even according to cited note/5121409 .
onterof (2026-03-19 20:07:53+00:00): Hallo,
du hast hier diverse Garagen als commercial erfasst und z.T. sind die Gebäude auch völlig zerstückelt, was auf dem Luftbild ganz anders aussieht (oder gar nicht vorhanden) z.B. in der Umgebung von dem hier way/1008280183
Nakaner (2026-03-20 11:03:30+00:00): Hallo Teddy73,

es steht die Frage im Raum, ob du hier einen Gebäueimport betreibst. Ich möchte dich daher bitten, die im Foren-Thread zu beteiligen.

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/import-von-gebaude-geometrien-etc-durch-nutzer/142460/13

Viele Grüße

Michael
Teddy73 (2026-03-20 18:43:09+00:00): Hallo, ich habe im Foren-Thread darauf geantwortet. 
VG Teddy
jengelh (2026-01-15 11:48:31+00:00): Stop your actions! "13 & 13a" is not valid house number syntax, and assigning it to a shed of all things is just as wrong.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-01-11 17:43:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 177106208 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed mechanical edit; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19423
JeroenHoek (2026-01-10 14:37:48+00:00): That is not correct. The name=* here combines the languages of the nations surrounding it.
Manuele R (2026-01-10 18:08:50+00:00): Ok, i did like the oceans but i saw now it is not the same. I apologize for that
ALu68 (2026-01-18 18:51:44+00:00): Hallo nekater,
Das gleiche Problem hier.

Falscher POI: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1249037117/history
POI schon vorhanden: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/705633173
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-01-11 17:43:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 177106208 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an undiscussed mechanical edit; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19423
Norbert Dichter (2026-01-10 14:52:36+00:00): Hello, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. Thank you for your contribution. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. Or just hit the Q-key.
Also please keep in mind: many buildings are very close but do not actually touch each other, try to map them close to each other without letting them connect or share nodes with each other, roads, or residential area outlines. In the iD web editor, holding down the "alt" key will keep nodes from "snapping" to each other and accidentally connecting.  Thanks so much for your contribution, Norbert 'Nodi' Dichter, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177063405
DaveF (2026-01-10 17:05:10+00:00): Where was this amendment discussed?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport=rugby%20union?uselang=en
12caracteres (2026-01-10 18:08:45+00:00): Hello DaveF,
I simply followed recommendations from the wiki : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Drugby
DaveF (2026-01-11 15:09:15+00:00): Even with your edits rugby_* is much more popular:
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=sport%3Drugby

https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2iAi
trigpoint (2026-01-11 17:19:48+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/177102231
trigpoint (2026-01-11 18:19:14+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/177102231
GinaroZ (2026-01-10 20:26:43+00:00): When was it decided to use this tagging scheme?
12caracteres (2026-01-10 20:44:35+00:00): Hello GinaroZ,
I simply followed recommendations from the wiki : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Drugby
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-01-11 14:07:11+00:00): revert undiscussed edit done in violation of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct - osm wiki claiming deprecation is not enough for mass edit

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177097667
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-01-11 14:07:43+00:00): see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/undiscussed-mass-edits-of-sport-rugby-union-and-sport-rugby-league/140303
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-01-11 14:11:44+00:00): Also, have you seen "Note that despite strong claims in this section {{tag|sport|rugby_union}} and {{tag|sport|rugby_league}} are not marked as deprecated, are used more, continue to be used. Claimed replacement {{tag|rugby}} is barely used and it is mostly one large jump" part of wiki page?
trigpoint (2026-01-11 17:19:45+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/177102231