piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
stevea (2024-02-22 20:31:49+00:00): I think it's fine to split off separate named areas (from unnamed areas), as you have.

MCP, RdG and CO are individual things (now) and so should be tagged accurately "for what they are, as they are."  That can be like nailing up jello.  You, or somebody, or you-interpreting-CPAD or something like that must know something about these in order to properly enter them into OSM.

That includes the (complex) history of how such tagging both emerges and remains fluid.  So, we are now having a "what do you know about these places and how do you wish to tag them" discussion.

Whether something even has leisure=nature_reserve tag applied can be a long/messy discussion I'd like to avoid.  It is true that this tag is associated with places that people can (easily) go to so we can, say, "observe nature" from a trail, platform, parking lot, or maybe take a hike if we stay on the trail.  If you know those places are like that, tag them so, perhaps with a bit more micromapping (a parking node, a trail...).
literan (2024-02-23 11:46:54+00:00): не надо заново рисовать снесенные гаражи
stevea (2024-02-17 22:37:19+00:00): I believe so, too!
Warin61 (2024-04-29 09:38:30+00:00): Hi,
What is the source of this information? 
The stated imagery does not show a helipad let alone a name..
ahunterg95 (2024-04-29 10:48:29+00:00): Hi Warin, I had been wondering where the base of Forrest Air Helicopters was for quite some time. Information is very limited,  but inaccurate flight tracking data led me to the general area and manual surveying of the satellite imagery eventually led me to the discovery of the large hangar. The concrete area out front is used for helicopter movements, landing and takeoff (helipad)
Veon11 (2024-02-19 06:31:45+00:00): Wrong name!
mavl (2024-02-18 08:28:23+00:00): Hello. I was in this place and I did not see this peak. What your source, please?
mbe57 (2024-02-19 12:10:51+00:00): TXs for coming back re. this "peak".
I am preparing a new release of the OAM world maps and - after 6 years from the initial peak selection and rendering - revisit this topic. While in the Urals, Pamir, etc. etc. you have dramatic peaks, there is nothing like that in huge areas of Russia and Canada. But still, there are "high points" that may be just a few m above the average of 200km around.
And most of them are not named, as they are lacking "drama". The only way to identify candidates is to use a DEM and an algorithm that screens for high points and calculates their isolations.
If you have a real elevation in your area that is higher than this place, pls. take over and put that one in (or move and correct name and elevation of this one).
TXs and cheers
Michael
mbe57 (2024-02-19 12:28:54+00:00): PS: the DEM is the Copernicus GLO-30 one.
PPete2 (2024-03-09 13:07:06+00:00): Hallo Nikolaus,

du hast hier versucht, den Stadtteil Kleinmünchen in recht unüblicher Weise und Tagging als Linienbegrenzung einzutragen.  Der Stadtteil selber wird mangels genauer Abgrenzung sowieso nur als place-node eingetragen https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/843484950

Es gibt noch den aktuellen statistischen Bezirk "Kleinmünchen-Auwiesen" welcher bereits vorhanden ist. 
Sowie die Katastralgemeinde "Kleinmünchen". Katastralgemeinden werden in OÖ aber selten erfasst und falls doch, dann im bewährten Grenz-Relation Schema und mit exakten Grenzlinien.
gscholz (2024-02-22 10:27:37+00:00): Hi Молотов-Прибой,
this changeset has created several errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=48.42675&lat=63.41951&zoom=10&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=147561980

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
borishag (2024-02-18 10:53:50+00:00): Hallo,

Kruidvat; Je hebt bijna alle filiaalinformatie verwijderd. Zou je deze weer kunnen herstellen?
bxl-forever_repair (2024-02-26 19:58:32+00:00): @borishag: FYI there are several buggy edits in this area caused by a faulty app named On Wheels.
This app aims at adding some tags about wheelchair accessibility… but the problem is that it violates OSM standards and erases a lot of existing tags on existing shops.
There have been talks with the devs of that app to warn them about the damage their users are causing and to have them rewrite it.  (I saw some discussions here to teach them how to create correct edits: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/create-changeset-api/109502)

I saw you already restored all the tags on your shop, that is fine.  I will try to have a look at other shops in this area.
literan (2024-02-23 11:42:42+00:00): снесенное здание отрисовано поверх других. Это вандализм, откат
Михаил 1995 (2024-03-01 11:46:50+00:00): прошу прощения, не знал, что здание снесено. думал, что в другой подложке более свежие снимки. А очертания "строящихся" посчитал ошибкой
VictorIE (2024-02-18 07:29:25+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/235221032

Is the fun park gone? Of so, what of the website?
tastrax (2024-02-18 02:47:21+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
mtmail (2024-02-26 15:08:30+00:00): Can you check the house number of the Southtown (West) shopping mall. On their website it lists a couple of shops within and from what I see the shops have house number 148.
b-holdet (2024-03-11 20:28:33+00:00): Hvorfor insisterer du på at sætte 
bicycle=designated 
på
highway=cycleway

Det er implicit givet i tagget "cycleway"
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bicycle=designated?uselang=da

Og kan du som minimum ikke tilføje
segregated=yes/no når du sætter foot og bicycle sammen på et vejstykke.
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-08 18:34:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 148396825 where the changeset comment is: weitere leidige edits unerwünschter Sockenpuppen entfernt s. https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Global_ban_of_user_geocodec
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-08 18:34:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 148396825 where the changeset comment is: weitere leidige edits unerwünschter Sockenpuppen entfernt s. https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Global_ban_of_user_geocodec
literan (2024-02-23 11:40:26+00:00): здание отрисовали поверх дорог, откат
Михаил 1995 (2024-03-01 11:49:07+00:00): согласен
sheldonelectric (2025-03-03 19:08:16+00:00): Hello, we add latin characters as int_name, and not in a parenthesis.
eggie (2024-02-17 10:56:33+00:00): Hi TS  Please use the present addressnode to tag on.
What is the company-name?

name=.... ?

HGreetz,
eggie
eggie (2024-02-17 11:03:44+00:00): Removed your duplicated addressnode.
Only company has no use..
Gr eggie
TS-Z (2024-02-17 18:27:24+00:00): Natuurvereniging Zuidwolde
eggie (2024-02-17 18:57:21+00:00): Oke.. use the present addressnode on the building.

Greetz..
eggie
literan (2024-02-23 11:36:54+00:00): отрисовал здание поверх улицы. Это вандализм
Михаил 1995 (2024-03-01 11:50:41+00:00): ориентировался на снимок, не сопоставился с улицей
literan (2024-02-23 11:36:16+00:00): отрисовал здание поверх другого. Это вандализм
sirorezka (2024-02-17 20:21:38+00:00): Добрый день, к сожалению, полигон отрисован неверно. Не могли бы вы перерисовать здание, согласно плану больницы:
https://zdrav.expert/images/thumb/4/40/172298642f8cdf32ef8eab4403712ec6109805f4c07158c9f76fce0e63bdfa57%281%29.jpg/840px-172298642f8cdf32ef8eab4403712ec6109805f4c07158c9f76fce0e63bdfa57%281%29.jpg
https://sp-ao.shortpixel.ai/client/to_webp,q_glossy,ret_img,w_711/https://gkbru.ru/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/korpusa-botkinskaya.jpg
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-08 18:34:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 148396825 where the changeset comment is: weitere leidige edits unerwünschter Sockenpuppen entfernt s. https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Global_ban_of_user_geocodec
NorthCrab_upload (2024-02-17 11:00:23+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2710578211
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/301676906

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-08 18:34:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 148396825 where the changeset comment is: weitere leidige edits unerwünschter Sockenpuppen entfernt s. https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Global_ban_of_user_geocodec
sirorezka (2024-02-18 20:49:05+00:00): Здравствуйте, ваше здание попало на дорогу. Уточните, пожалуйста, местоположение здания или дороги.
literan (2024-02-23 11:34:21+00:00): это он дубль здания нарисовал (включи слой Мапбокс и увидишь). Еще один платный правщик тяп-ляп, лишь бы денег заработать.
sirorezka (2024-02-23 18:53:29+00:00): ок ) спасибо, что исправляешь
sirorezka (2024-02-23 18:54:46+00:00): Посмотрел mapbox, стало понятно, как он нарисовал.
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-08 18:34:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 148396825 where the changeset comment is: weitere leidige edits unerwünschter Sockenpuppen entfernt s. https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Global_ban_of_user_geocodec
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-08 18:34:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 148396825 where the changeset comment is: weitere leidige edits unerwünschter Sockenpuppen entfernt s. https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Global_ban_of_user_geocodec
grelus (2024-03-05 07:11:53+00:00): cześć! na jakiej podstawie wrysowałeś skarpy na półwyspie w Lipianach? Byłem w terenie i tam nie ma żadnych skarp.
Lužicki Bieluch (2025-06-16 14:31:33+00:00): teraz chyba rozumiem, dlaczego jest "mass deleting" moich prac, grodu na pierwszy rzut oka nie ujrzysz - z pozycji terenu, grodzisko możesz widzieć jedynie z pozycji cieniowania mapy... nakładka geoportal 2 cieniowanie się kłania :l
Lužicki Bieluch (2025-06-16 14:33:36+00:00): druga rzecz, napisałem w swoim opisie, że najszybciej informacje można dostać ode mnie przez discorda, siedzę na OSM Polska jak i na OSM World
grelus (2025-06-16 17:15:00+00:00): 1. zasada jest taka, że wprowadzamy na mapę elementy widoczne w terenie
2. znam i korzystam z warstwy cieniowania, i Twoje edycje zupełnie nie odpowiadały ukształtowaniu terenu widocznemu na tej warstwie
3. jeżeli tam są wały ziemne to z pewnością nie są to strome klify, czy skarpy. Sam potwierdzasz, że nie jest to widoczne w terenie a jedynie w warstwie cieniowania
Lužicki Bieluch (2025-06-17 13:56:09+00:00): Rozmawiałem już z administratorem na ten temat , permisję mam. Co do 1 podpunktu = widać, tylko lata orki i rabunkowej pracy człowieka doprowadziły do złagodzenia nasypów grodziska, nie do zniszczenia jak w przypadku grodów koło Sławy Śląskiej. 2 podpunkt = cieniowanie, ok ; jeśli kształt nie odpowiadał w 100% to można było zedytować do stanu faktycznego :l . 3 podpunkt = "(...) na PIERWSZY rzut oka nie ujrzysz (...)" oczywiście, bez zaznajomienia się wcześniejszego z kształtem terenu grodu. Co do tych "stromych klifów czy skarp" to ja używam tagu=embankment, czyli nasyp.
(Gdyby ten gród znajdował się na wyniosłej górze, ok, tedy klif, ale tu brak klifu.)
eteb3 (2024-07-31 08:28:15+00:00): Me again, conifermapper!

Intrigued by this enormous fence! Again, may I ask your source? As you walk up Crug Mawr from Partrishow it seems to be a wall.

Thanks, eteb3
eteb3 (2024-07-31 09:03:48+00:00): Sorry, this fence: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1104805770
conifermapper (2024-07-31 18:57:37+00:00): Hi Eteb3,

This fence is the land ownership boundary between the common land in the hills and private fields below. In places it may be a dry stone wall, although this is only verifiable by on site surveying. Where this is the case the lengths of stone wall could be split from the original way and tagged accordingly. The source was the Openstreetmap Cadastral parcels which show land ownership boundaries.

Kind regards, conifermapper
eteb3 (2024-08-02 14:02:40+00:00): Thanks, I've made a note to put walls in where I've seen them in due course. 

Would you be averse to splitting the way anyway, to make it less unwieldy?

One effect of it being so long is that every time any fragment of it is amended (eg, by another fence being joined to it), the whole way gets a new version. So keeping track of the changes is difficult.
conifermapper (2024-08-02 17:03:09+00:00): Hello Eteb3, 

I would reccomend splitting it anyway
eggie (2024-02-17 11:48:59+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback 
Alle begin is moeilijk. 
Maar waarom dan access=no ?
foot=yes hoeft niet op een wandelpad. Dat is default. 

Ook hoeg je geen foot=yes bij te taggen op fietspaden. Dat is ook ingebakken. 
 
Je edit.. 
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=147566139

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-02-17 12:00:14+00:00): Jorgis,
access=no icm met andere accesstagging heb ik verwijderd.
De notes over de constructie idem. 
access=no is bijna altijd fout op openbare wegen. 
Wegen die heel lang uit de roulatie zijn kunnen beter op highway=construction worden gezet. 
Bij kortere afsluitingen gebruiken we conditionaltagging.  BV access:conditional=no @ (2023 Sep 20-2024 Apr 3) 
Dan gaat zo'n weg automatisch weer open. 
access=no valt niet op en deze blijven nog lange tijd niet routeren.

Maar het routeert...  weer prima dus.  
MVG
eggie
jorgis123 (2024-02-17 15:10:15+00:00): Ah, okay, ik vond de OSM documentatie over wat de tag deed niet duidelijk en ging voor de veilige optie (want er stond dat andere tags "access=no" overriden).

Ik was bang dat een andere input bij access wellicht meer deed dan gepland.

Bedankt voor het oplossen.
eggie (2024-02-17 15:17:53+00:00): Een enkele keer komt de combinatie wel eens voor.. maar dan niet op de openbare weg.
Dat overrulen klopt wel.. maar....
Het gevaar zit erin als iemand de overbodige foot=yes gaat verwijderen van een footway. Soms zelfs met een automatic edit. .. access=no blijft dan staan.
Ook rendert een pad niet meer goed op de kaart met access=no. Wat vage lijntjes..
Groet..
eggie
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-08 18:33:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 148396825 where the changeset comment is: weitere leidige edits unerwünschter Sockenpuppen entfernt s. https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Global_ban_of_user_geocodec
ThomasMayerMTDN (2024-09-05 05:53:15+00:00): Die richtige PLZ ist 12687. Bitte korrigieren Sie. Danke schön
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-08 18:34:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 148396825 where the changeset comment is: weitere leidige edits unerwünschter Sockenpuppen entfernt s. https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Global_ban_of_user_geocodec
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-08 18:34:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 148396825 where the changeset comment is: weitere leidige edits unerwünschter Sockenpuppen entfernt s. https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Global_ban_of_user_geocodec
literan (2024-02-23 11:30:56+00:00): не надо отрисовывать уже снесенные гаражи. Откат
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-08 18:33:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 148396825 where the changeset comment is: weitere leidige edits unerwünschter Sockenpuppen entfernt s. https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Global_ban_of_user_geocodec
MichS (2024-02-17 14:53:03+00:00): Hallo,

der Weg war nun gemäß der history mal footway, mal cycleway, mal path. Was stimmt denn, welche Verkehrsschilder sind aufgestellt?

MFG
NorthCrab_upload (2024-02-17 11:42:16+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Burzyńskiego":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11634156985

"Wały Dwernickiego":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11634157152

"Sienkiewicza":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11634157244
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11634157257

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-08 18:34:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 148396825 where the changeset comment is: weitere leidige edits unerwünschter Sockenpuppen entfernt s. https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Global_ban_of_user_geocodec
BEV Austria Community Account (2024-02-17 21:28:14+00:00): Danke, dass du die Interessen der Österreichischen Craftmapper gegen die Geographen Mafia und kommerzielle Interessen deutscher Firmen verteidigst.
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2024-03-01 08:40:15+00:00): الوسم name مخصص للمسميات باللغة العربية نرجوا منكم جعل اللغات الأخرى حسب الوسوم الخاصة بها مثل name:en
mappOG (2024-03-01 11:55:38+00:00): It is also acceptable to internationalize name tags by using delimited tags. However, you can feel free to change.
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2024-03-01 16:35:30+00:00): The international name is added in the tag int_name[:<xx>] and not in name. Our official language in Saudi Arabia is Arabic. If you want to put other languages, please put them in the other tags.
mappOG (2024-03-03 14:54:16+00:00): Ok. I will revert yhe changes. Thank you
empty_child (2024-02-17 21:37:01+00:00): Tani, good afternoon
It's better to use club=game in this case
marc__marc (2025-12-08 23:20:51+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3476331833/history/7
si tu en as l'occasion, pourrais-tu vérifier :
si le réseau est toujours Izivia  ? l'opendata a l'air de dire que Izivia  est opérateur et que le réseau est Auchan
type 2 : 2 ? osmose propose 1 (mais n'est pas toujours fiable sur ce point)
J'ai intégré le reste des données et laissé ces 2 points comme tu avais renseigné
Cordialement,
Marc
marczoutendijk (2024-03-11 19:07:48+00:00): Your comment on this changeset is just ridiculous. What does "." mean?

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
silversurfer83 (2024-03-19 11:47:02+00:00): Dear Marc,

People from all over the World have been trying to contact Marius for nearly 4 years now and no reaction can be seen. This is very sad to witness.

Marius, your contributions are very welcome, thank you.
Still there are rules and guidelines to ensure a good set of data that millions of people rely on every day. The community is here 24/7 to help if there are questions.
literan (2024-02-23 11:29:33+00:00): здание поверх забора, правка тяп-ляп, откат
woodpeck_repair (2024-02-19 09:12:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 147640554, 147640510, 147640527, 147640501, 147640494, 147640506, 147640498, 147640562, 147640547, 147640556, 147640515, 147640567, 147640499, 147640558, 147640495, 147640496, 147640503, 147640479, 147640518, 147640559, 147640552, 147640531, 147640483, 147640546, 147640517, 147640536, 147640565, 147640520, 147640566, 147640512, 147640561, 147640492, 147640549, 147640523, 147640538, 147640524, 147640533, 147640481, 147640544, 147640534, 147640528, 147640543, 147640529, 147640525, 147640502, 147640540, 147640521, 147640507, 147640560, 147640488 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import that created lots of overlapping builidngs
woodpeck_repair (2024-02-19 09:12:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 147640554, 147640510, 147640527, 147640501, 147640494, 147640506, 147640498, 147640562, 147640547, 147640556, 147640515, 147640567, 147640499, 147640558, 147640495, 147640496, 147640503, 147640479, 147640518, 147640559, 147640552, 147640531, 147640483, 147640546, 147640517, 147640536, 147640565, 147640520, 147640566, 147640512, 147640561, 147640492, 147640549, 147640523, 147640538, 147640524, 147640533, 147640481, 147640544, 147640534, 147640528, 147640543, 147640529, 147640525, 147640502, 147640540, 147640521, 147640507, 147640560, 147640488 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import that created lots of overlapping builidngs
literan (2024-02-23 11:28:28+00:00): переносить данные из других карт без разрешения от правообладателя запрещено. Откачу.

Не надо так делать больше
mavl (2024-03-26 15:37:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149183745 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15868].
mcliquid (2024-02-17 13:57:07+00:00): Hi,

please note: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
literan (2024-02-23 11:25:50+00:00): здание нарисовано поверх забора, правка тяп-ляп, откат.
noelbov (2024-02-17 15:57:18+00:00): Hi MJans,
Is bij die "details" de enkelrichting  inbegrepen van 2 segmenten van de Speelpleinstraat? Als dat zo is dan zijn fietsroutes 224-229 en 224-230 onderbroken, of moet bij die 2 segmenten tag oneway:bicycle=no worden bijgezet?
Dank voor antwoord
NB
mjans (2024-02-17 17:50:37+00:00): Inderdaad, dat was ik blijkbaar vergeten. Bedankt om dit te melden. Ik heb de tag 'oneway:bicycle=no' toegevoegd in de 2 segmenten.
ivanbranco (2024-02-17 21:12:22+00:00): Ciao gigi,

non sono esperto di route per i bus, per quale motivo é stato necessario dividere Via Trieste? I due spezzoni fanno parte della stessa relazione e hanno gli stessi identici tag.
gigi2037 (2024-02-18 13:44:50+00:00): Ciao osm insector mi dava un gap perchè il bus scende da via egitto
NorthCrab_upload (2024-02-17 13:16:14+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Mazurka Dąbrowskiego 1, 83-400":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8874751558

"Jesienna":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11634341405
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11634341406
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11634341407
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11634341408
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11634341409
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11634341410

"Fiołkowa":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/310308545

"31 Stycznia 1920 Roku":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/360319322

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
G_P_J (2024-02-17 15:22:30+00:00): Poprawione.
eggie (2024-02-17 13:57:31+00:00): Hi PP  .. welcome to OSM. 

Do they realy cross each other? 
You are sure?
And please comment your edits in English. 

Your edits
Popiejopie12 (2024-02-17 14:07:01+00:00): I'm sorry for the Dutch,
I know for sure that the end of the lift is not were it was drawn before. also if you look at the satellite image you can see that the end is not there and that the buildings are pointed nicely along the new line.
eggie (2024-02-17 14:39:46+00:00): Jolly good!
Popiejopie12 (2024-02-21 16:27:12+00:00): Hello, i've been skien here yesterday and i was wrong, they recently placed a new lift and removed one. so i was confused. the satelite imagery isn't updated yet
eggie (2024-02-21 16:34:27+00:00): Oke.. I will have a look.
eggie (2024-02-21 16:38:12+00:00): Ahh   You made your correction allready  :)
Greetz,
eggie
literan (2024-02-23 11:24:10+00:00): вы отрисовали уже снесенный дом, на снимках Esri его уже нет. Не надо так делать.
eggie (2024-02-17 13:50:43+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback  Is dit een kantoor of id de naam van het gebouw Kantoor?
Nog een tip: Beter niet schuiven met de kaart in editmodus. 
MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community