piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
porfiriopaiz (2025-10-29 02:46:09+00:00): Hola J00SECI,

¿Podrías indicarme qué fuente de información has consultado al momento de realizar los cambios de las etiquetas de los elementos que has modificado en este conjunto de cambios?

Quiero hacer la observación de que estos elementos fueron originalmente agregados por contribuidores profesionales que en su momento han citado las fuentes de información en las cuales se han basado sus contribuciones.

¿Podrías hacer lo mismo?

Entretanto, podrías abstenerte de modificar sin fundamento alguno las contribuciones hechas por otros voluntarios.

Únicamente estás entorpeciendo el trabajo que ya han realizado.

Atentamente,
Porfirio Páiz
porfiriopaiz (2025-10-29 02:45:50+00:00): Hola J00SECI,

¿Podrías indicarme qué fuente de información has consultado al momento de realizar los cambios de las etiquetas de los elementos que has modificado en este conjunto de cambios?

Quiero hacer la observación de que estos elementos fueron originalmente agregados por contribuidores profesionales que en su momento han citado las fuentes de información en las cuales se han basado sus contribuciones.

¿Podrías hacer lo mismo?

Entretanto, podrías abstenerte de modificar sin fundamento alguno las contribuciones hechas por otros voluntarios.

Únicamente estás entorpeciendo el trabajo que ya han realizado.

Atentamente,
Porfirio Páiz
Swihail (2025-11-28 06:59:32+00:00): "Hello Justinebaekc
 I have fixed validation error between building & highway for way 1185752129 and way 304365439
 Please inspect your task carefully before closing.
 Happy Mapping!"
user_5359 (2025-10-29 09:53:18+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/13264075032. Is this really a description or rather a reference number for administrative classification?
user_5359 (2025-10-28 07:24:15+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't overpaint an existing street for renaming. I correct your modification
porfiriopaiz (2025-10-29 02:45:24+00:00): Hola J00SECI,

¿Podrías indicarme qué fuente de información has consultado al momento de realizar los cambios de las etiquetas de los elementos que has modificado en este conjunto de cambios?

Quiero hacer la observación de que estos elementos fueron originalmente agregados por contribuidores profesionales que en su momento han citado las fuentes de información en las cuales se han basado sus contribuciones.

¿Podrías hacer lo mismo?

Entretanto, podrías abstenerte de modificar sin fundamento alguno las contribuciones hechas por otros voluntarios.

Únicamente estás entorpeciendo el trabajo que ya han realizado.

Atentamente,
Porfirio Páiz
Madi-Red (2025-11-28 08:23:30+00:00): Hello , thank You for your contribution. I corrected all issues related to building and highway intersections within our Africa - Fix Building and Highway Intersection challenge and restored objects which you removed. Make sure that you do not remove existing objects from the map and, if there are no validation errors before data upload. Happy Mapping!
TriangleMaple (2025-10-29 03:50:36+00:00): Additional sources alongside the survey:

https://burnaby.widen.net/s/mmjwrxv6pm/metrotown-downtown-plan

Map on page 49/165 of the pdf, If you count the numbers on the bottom of the pdf, it's page 37

Land is marked for open-space/park usage.
hahae (2025-10-28 15:47:26+00:00): reverted in 173889527 due to possible incompatible license
dmjab13 (2025-10-28 02:50:00+00:00): thank you!
citrula (2025-10-28 08:55:52+00:00): Thanks for your work in the area. I'm curious to hear the story behind these names, if you happen to know it. I was a bit confused by the multiple spring names present in GNIS when I added it originally.
rpoulsen47 (2025-10-28 12:35:20+00:00): I've only ever heard of it as called Queen's Bath, but I'm not really sure where that came from. If I recall correctly, there might be a sign on/next to a bench somewhere near the springs that says Queen's Bath? I'll have to double check the next time I'm out there.
citrula (2025-10-28 16:42:28+00:00): There is!
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11937306929
it's a ways downstream from the spring itself.
rpoulsen47 (2025-10-28 17:42:21+00:00): Nice! Thanks for finding that!
Hung Tran 9x0 (2025-12-11 06:39:38+00:00): 1 địa chỉ bạn thêm 2 lần đó, 20 tháng trước bạn đã thêm một lần, rồi 44 ngày trước lại thêm cái này, mà 2 địa chỉ không cũng một vị trí nữa 🤭
nevw (2025-10-28 07:53:58+00:00): Hi, you have mapped two defibrillators at the same spot. Are there two here or should I delete the duplicate?
Entbert (2026-01-26 17:18:01+00:00): Hi flagurglehurp! On these two signals
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13264294249
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13266265122
you used the key railway:signal:route:design. I think it would be better to use the subkey "shape" instead of "design" as it is part of the international tagging scheme documented at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Dsignal#List_of_signal_properties (and also in line with the tagging used in NSW https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Railway_Signals#NSW).
nitin PVT LTD (2025-10-29 07:52:28+00:00): Gajanan Maharaj temple malkhed bk ner Yavatmal Maharashtra 445102 call 9699185141
trigpoint (2025-11-13 20:38:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by the DWG under Ticket#2025100210000037
trigpoint (2025-11-13 20:38:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by the DWG under Ticket#2025100210000037
trigpoint (2025-11-13 20:38:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by the DWG under Ticket#2025100210000037
trigpoint (2025-11-13 20:38:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by the DWG under Ticket#2025100210000037
trigpoint (2025-11-13 20:38:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by the DWG under Ticket#2025100210000037
Frans S (2025-11-02 13:33:47+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are very sloppy !. Please improve your mapping skills.
Best regards
Glassman (2025-10-29 16:59:24+00:00): #TIP: The device should be on a stand alone node not on a existing way. I look for the pole's shaddow to determine where to place the node.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173865424
hatul (2025-10-28 10:09:50+00:00): שלום ותודה על התרומה למפה

נראה שכדאי לסדר קצת את הסינגל. הוא כולל כל מיני שבילים לכל הכיוונים.
גם היחס הזה כנראה מיותר.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/999535312

תודה
hatul (2025-10-28 10:18:44+00:00): עוד כמה הערות:
1. הסימון הנכון הוא 
highway=path
bicycle=designated

כי cycleway מיועד לשביל אופניים עירוני.

2. לא צריך לתת שם לכל קטע ביחס הם יקבלו את השם מהיחס עצמו.

תיקנתי את שתי הבעיות האלה.

3. יש לך יחס חבר ביחס, זו בדרך כלל טעות שכדאי לתקן.
4. כדאי להחליט מה השם של הסינגל ולא לכתוב את שני השמות. אפשר להגדיר את השם השני בתור alt_name.

תודה
Alliegaytor (2025-10-30 02:30:18+00:00): The driveway should connect to the road in addition to the footpath
RahilPasha (2025-10-31 03:56:02+00:00): Thank you for the valuable feedback. I have connected driveway to the main road. I look forward to your suggestion/feedback in the future as well. Thank you
angys (2025-11-16 14:32:57+00:00): Hi, this is not a station yet
user_5359 (2025-10-28 07:05:33+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I remove your entry, because you are not part of a praking slot. 
For a better description (if you can't find any examples or ask anyone else), please visit our wiki at https://wiki.osm.org.
angys (2025-11-14 18:13:06+00:00): Hi, I don't think it's an existing station yet, please make it as construction building and station
rene78 (2025-11-15 01:56:56+00:00): Okay, done. I think I have mapped most/all of the ECRL stations like that already. Need to fix that, too.
BCNorwich (2025-12-08 07:47:20+00:00): Welcome to OSM.

Many problems with the footpath Way: 1445697788. It crosses over highways and buildings, for the most part along lines of existing paths. Thus I;ve removed it.

Regards Bernard.
McDreimiller (2025-11-26 18:52:40+00:00): I just discovered this camera down the street from my house. It appears that you added it to this map in October. Would you know when that camera was actually installed at this location?
S-zation (2025-11-28 03:39:01+00:00): Hi, I saw these cameras when taking a detour off the highway, so I’m not completely sure.

City of Groton camera - probably spring of 2024 based off of the city’s PACT meeting minutes stating that they acquired flock cameras

Mystic (Stonington) camera - August or September 2025 based off of no camera present in Mapillary.com photos

Ledyard camera -  August or September 2025 based off of no camera present in Mapillary.com photos
McDreimiller (2025-12-05 21:09:46+00:00): I contacted the Ledyard PD and they confirmed that this camera was installed in September. I just added two other cameras in Ledyard that they told me about, and a 4th will be installed soon.
S-zation (2025-12-05 23:35:04+00:00): Nice - thank you for your additions to the map!
Jrachi (2025-10-29 08:43:12+00:00): Ciao.
La way che hai eliminato e parte di una relazione di un percorso escursionistico del catasto nazionale!
La relazione su OSM è stata ricavata dal gpx registrato da un professionista nel 2014.
Attualmente la zona ha una conferenza di comuni che si occupa della revisione dei percorsi escursionistici.
Devo sapere se la traccia non si vede o se ci sono ostacoli fisici. In modo da aiutare la pianificazione.
Potresti indicarmi un percorso alternativo?
O, se non ci sono grossi ostacoli, ripristinare la way e aggiungere il tag trailvisibility=no (che si usa spesso in zone di campagna dove l'erba cresce velocemente).

Grazie
Ivo
cicciobisticcio (2025-10-29 11:23:12+00:00): Ho  eliminato quel pezzo di traccia perchè l'ho affrontata con la mia bici https://www.strava.com/activities/16180204860. La traccia si interrompe bruscamente . Non c'è possibilità neanche di attraversarla a piedi. Il campo è arato e non c'è neanche la parvenza della vecchia traccia. Spero di non aver combinato un guaio.
Saluti
Jrachi (2025-10-29 11:25:52+00:00): Il guaio sono quei percorsi a catasto "rilevati" da un professionista che dopo 10-15 anni scopri essere non transitabili.
Ti ringrazio della segnalazione, provvedo a inviare il problema a chi se ne deve occupare.

Ivo
Kovoschiz (2025-10-28 07:56:57+00:00): Please don't add descriptive labels to `name=` , as it's for proper names themselves only. Use `description=` if needed.
Alliegaytor (2025-10-30 02:28:55+00:00): The driveway should connect to the road in addition to the footpath
RahilPasha (2025-10-31 03:50:33+00:00): Thank you for the valuable feedback. I have connected driveway to the main road. I look forward to your suggestion/feedback in the future as well. Thank you
NeisBot (2025-10-28 07:48:42+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Sklep z grillem i akcesoriami"
NeisBot (2025-10-28 07:48:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisBot (2025-10-28 07:48:45+00:00): Например, более нейтральная и фактическая версия вашего описания могла бы быть: "Магазин гриля и аксессуаров"
---
(Auto-translation)
NeisReview (2025-11-01 19:34:12+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/173899046

Thanks, bartgron
mavl (2025-11-15 10:56:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 174681717 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
Mercanto123 (2025-11-20 08:43:53+00:00): Hej @db-ak, będziesz w taki sposób mapował cały Poznań, wszystkie osiedla?
Jak już zacząłeś to mam nadzieję, że skończysz :)
db-ak (2025-11-20 08:51:33+00:00): Taki mam powolny plan, chciałbym wykorzystać te ścieżki pod nawigację bo w wielu miejscach będą fajne skróty. Zacząłem od swojej okolicy i planuje robić dalsze dzielnice lub parki
omidmash (2025-10-28 08:24:11+00:00): Fixed opening hours based on official website: https://www.musee-moyenage.fr/en/visiter/practical-information.html
eggie (2025-10-28 09:16:32+00:00): Dag Loud Flag Je hebt met je actie twee adresnodes verwijderd.
Bestaan die adressen niet meer?
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=173871253

MVG
eggie
Loud Flag (2025-10-28 09:21:12+00:00): Neonweg 41 stond dubbel. Dat is al node van bedrijf Royal Smit & Zoon. Is complex met meerdere gebouwen.
Wolframkade was dubbel adres, er is al node voor bedrijf HKS Metals.
eggie (2025-10-28 09:27:13+00:00): Ahh  Oke.. Ik heb de  BAG adresnode teruggezet en samengevoegd met het bedrijf.
Even als company getagd 
Dat stond als landuse en dat geeft een foutmelding.
Ga even na welke postcode wordt gehanteerd, want de BAG adresnode geeft een andere postcode.
Het liefst houden we de Kadaster postcodes aan. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-10-28 09:29:11+00:00): ⚲ Wolframkade 2, 3812 RC Amersfoort
Het is denk ik nu correct.
wouterko (2025-10-28 14:09:21+00:00): Dit ging niet zoals gehoopt en heb ik gerevert in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173872927
Sylabowy Kot (2025-11-22 09:49:49+00:00): Dodawanie landuse=residential budynkowi nie ma żadnego sensu. Wyspa landuse w landuse ma sens, jeśli enklawę da się opisać innymi tagami np. osiedle zamknięte w większym osiedlu. Budynek bez grodzenia nie można nazwać takim osiedlem. Skasowałem ten niepotrzebny tag.
SomeoneElse (2026-01-08 12:25:03+00:00): Hello,
Can you explain the "cusine" tag on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13192384226 ?  It is a pharmacy, not a restaurant.
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2026-01-08 12:25:15+00:00): Здравейте,
Можете ли да обясните етикета „cusine“ на https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13192384226? Това е аптека, а не ресторант.
С най-добри пожелания,
Анди
SomeoneElse (2025-11-30 20:02:56+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!,

On this changeset you've used a "source=Google Maps" tag. We can't actually use that as a source in OSM because Google's licence doesn't allow it to be used here - it would cause real problems for the project if we were found to be using Google Maps as a source.
If this is somewhere that you are familiar with, then "source=local_knowledge" would be perfectly OK. If not, we'll have to undo this change.

Best Regards
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group
user_5359 (2025-10-30 10:58:09+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1081856827.  What is the mean of the tag Παραλία = Κατερίνης?
NGlf (2025-10-30 11:20:15+00:00): Hi, nice catch.  I copied the value 'Παραλία Κατερίνης' (the city tag) and i pasted this on JOSM in a haste as a tag with value.
eggie (2025-10-28 09:13:37+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  Om een adres te vidnen maakt het niet veel uit. Sommige gebruikers vinden het juist weer handig als de adressen op een hoopje liggen bij de hoofdingang. Bv bezorgdiensten.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
b5i (2025-10-30 21:41:20+00:00): Według doniesień prasowych (np. https://rzeszow-news.pl/wislokostrada-na-ostatniej-prostej-w-listopadowych-planach-warstwa-scieralna-zdjecia/) droga ma być gotowa do końca roku, a obecnie prowadzone są na niej jeszcze prace, więc usunięcie tagów oznaczających budowę wydaje się błędem.
Pooh01 (2025-10-31 06:00:56+00:00): Tam gdzie trwa budowa, tam jest pozostawione construction. Tam gdzie jest ukończone i stoją barierki, żeby nie jeździć jest access=no. Rondo na północy też jest formmalnie w budowie (i znajduje sie na landuse=construction), a puszczony jest po nim ruch.
eggie (2025-10-28 09:30:40+00:00): review_requested 	yes

Lijkt me correct zo.
gr eggie
RonaldM011 (2025-10-28 09:35:42+00:00): Top dankjewel, postbezorging gaat meestal mis omdat de begane grond (47, 49, 51, 53) met eigen voordeur niet worden herkend. Dus wordt het maar in de open centrale hal 'gegooid'.
Hannes0815 (2025-10-29 10:22:15+00:00): Der Outfit Laden hat nichts mit der englischen Kette zu tun (die Laut verlinktem wiki auch nicht mehr existiert)
sondern wird von "Vereinigung Freiburger Sozialarbeit e.V." getragen

https://www.vfs-ev.de/kleiderladen-outfit/outfit-secondhand-kleider-frauen/
ayxis (2025-11-14 08:23:16+00:00): Hi!
Warum hast du den access-Tag bei osm.org/way/431492960 und osm.org/way/228558984 zu private verändert? Alle anliegenden Straßen haben access=no.

Viele Grüße
ayxis
Mikenjinoda (2025-11-19 16:08:54+00:00): Hallo, sämtliche Fahrstrassen auf dem Flughafen sind mit entsprechender Berechtigung zugänglich, deshalb sollten aus meiner Sicht alle Strassen im Gelände mit private gekennzeichnet sein. Oder erfordert die schwer erhältliche Zugangsberechtigung hier doch access=no? In dem Fall sorry für den falschen tag und kann gerne auf "no" gesetzt werden.
ayxis (2025-11-20 08:12:36+00:00): Hi,
alles gut. Ich habe mich nur über die access=private-Insel gewundert, die in dem Ozean aus access=no existiert :)
Ich würde die Straße wieder auf access=no setzen, um es konsistent zu halten.

Viele Grüße
ayxis
Mikenjinoda (2025-11-20 12:39:57+00:00): Hi, ja ich hatte mal damit angefangen, da ich sowieso dort was bearbeitet hatte, darum die Insel :-) Kannst es gerne zurücksetzen, danke. Grüsse
Jordi MF (2025-10-28 18:16:08+00:00): Hola jorafa,

Veo que para dibujar un muro, estás utilizando la etiqueta de "edificio" (building=yes), pero no es correcta.

Existe una etiqueta correcta para los muros: barrier=wall (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier=wall).

He borrado tu muro y lo he vuelto a dibujar con la etiqueta correcta: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1445818539

Gracias igualmente por mejorar los datos. También veo que ya no superpones edificios y que no dejas espacios entre ellos. ¡Bien!

¡Saludos!
Lyon-St-Clair (2025-10-30 16:52:00+00:00): y'a pas une incohérence avec le débouché de l'avenue sur la rue Mirzakhani ?
Voirie_3M (2025-10-31 09:35:00+00:00): Oui c'est vrai. Nous avons laissé en l'état car c'est en travaux, en attendant la configuration définitive. 
J'enlève cette bretelle du coup.
Merci pour la remarque
Yasmina Bendik (2025-10-28 09:47:55+00:00): *ERRATUM : Guarbecque
Fraxi (2025-10-28 12:07:11+00:00): "...видяни по-рано обекти" трябваше да бъде.
InsertUser (2025-11-06 04:56:17+00:00): Please don't put building tags areas that aren't actual buildings.
eggie (2025-10-28 12:01:45+00:00): Feedback...Lijkt me oke
Maple_ (2025-10-31 17:50:43+00:00): سلام mapwitch،
من متوجه شدم که در این تغییرات، چندین برچسب یک‌طرفه از بزرگراه‌ها حذف شده‌اند. آیا می‌توانید منابع یا مشاهدات محلی که از این به‌روزرسانی‌ها پشتیبانی می‌کنند را به اشتراک بگذارید؟ اگر این تغییرات غیرعمدی بوده‌اند، آیا مایلید برچسب‌های یک‌طرفه را بازیابی کنید؟ متشکرم و روز خوبی داشته باشید
Maple_ (2025-10-31 18:38:20+00:00): Hi mapwitch, I noticed that several one-way tags were removed from highways in this changeset. Would you be able to share any resources or local observations that support these updates? If these changes were unintentional, would you mind restoring the one-way tags? Thanks and have a nice day!
mapwitch (2025-11-03 08:55:42+00:00): I have not edited the direction of highways. If I notice that waterways are flowing in the wrong direction, I change them to the correct direction (in the direction of flow, using satellite images and elevation data as sources). Please specify a few highways that you are referring to.
Maple_ (2025-11-04 17:34:05+00:00): Thank you for your response! Based on the edit history, it looks like several highways including https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/422339743, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/322875778, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/422339741, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/178379414, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/435122977, and a few others were modified in your changeset. Could you please take another look at these edits? When confirmed, it would be great if you could restore the oneway tags that were removed. I would also be happy to help restore some of the tagging if you would like, since it sounds like this was an accident.
Thanks again for your time!
mapwitch (2025-11-05 11:58:58+00:00): This must be a mistake, but I have no idea how it happened. :-(

Can you recommend a procedure for how I can most easily reset the one-way changes to highways?

I only know how to reset the entire changeset. But that would mean all the desired changes would be lost.

I would be very grateful if you could help me with this!
Maple_ (2025-11-06 19:17:35+00:00): Thanks for your response. I suggest reverting the entire changeset, as it’s the most reliable way to restore the original oneway tags. The recent edits also affected a large number of other features and tags across the city, such as ref information from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/248487129, and railway tagging on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/53855428. I would recommend a more targeted edit to waterway features specifically. Let me know if I can help assist with any changes, thank you!
mapwitch (2025-11-07 08:15:37+00:00): I have reverted the entire changeset. There were some conflicts with the server data, but I hope I have resolved them correctly.
Maple_ (2025-11-10 17:45:13+00:00): Thanks for your collaboration! Have a great day!
indigomc (2026-01-04 15:54:50+00:00): Most of the 'other language' names for the city of Yazd remained lost. I have replaced them from history. This includes the Farsi name, which does not agree with wikipedia - could someone please check it.
Maple_ (2026-01-05 21:08:53+00:00): Hello, thank you for reaching out. Could you please specify a few features that you are referring to? Have a great day!
mapwitch (2026-01-08 10:04:22+00:00): These are mainly highways, where I added a bridge, for example, or sometimes dams. Features like that, which are related to waterways.
Maple_ (2026-01-09 18:55:38+00:00): I reviewed the alt names for the various languages that were removed in your changeset, and it appears they have all been added back. Thanks for your efforts in restoring the data and hope you have a nice day!
eggie (2025-10-28 14:02:26+00:00): covered=yes toegevoegd als voorbeeld. layer=1 verwijderd. 
Die half open gedeelten staan vaak niet in de BAG en kun je beter apart intekenen. 
Groet
eggie
eggie (2025-10-28 14:13:51+00:00): CTRL-f5 voor het effect
NeisBot (2025-10-28 10:06:51+00:00): Hi ayman tight, welcome to the OSM projekt and thanks for your contribution!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish
NeisBot (2025-10-28 10:06:51+00:00): Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added building with name "مركز شرطة العبيدي", height 3"
goedegazelle (2025-10-28 18:13:10+00:00): Het label "bus=yes" op een highway betekent dat een bus er mag rijden. Het perron is echter bedoeld voor passagiers.
NeisBot (2025-10-28 10:15:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisBot (2025-10-28 10:15:42+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "IT services company in Reading"
NeisReview (2025-11-01 19:33:20+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/174056038

Thanks, user_5359
dzamper (2025-10-28 11:54:22+00:00): Tonaż i jego `source:` zdaje się że też… ciekawe co jeszcze i gdzie jeszcze