piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ObscureAngel (2024-09-23 08:21:15+00:00): Bonjour, merci pour votre contribution :-)

A l'avenir veuillez noter qu'il est recommandé de mettre des commentaires plus précis sur vos groupes de changements (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bons_commentaires_de_groupe_de_modifications)

Merci beaucoup, passez une bonne journée et bonne cartographie ! :-)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156982163
opendcc (2024-09-24 05:38:51+00:00): Hallo,

willkommen auf OpenStreetMap und viel Spass. Dein erste Edit war schon ganz gut, ein paar Kleinigkeiten (z.B. Formatvorgabe für Phone/Web/Währung) habe ich noch angepasst.
eggie (2024-09-23 08:50:47+00:00): Dag ridouan Ik heb het aangepast naar oneway:conditional=
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Conditional_restrictions

MVG
eggie
Ygramul (2024-09-24 10:55:45+00:00): Hey, thanks for adding destinations. Note that for the symbols, colours, etc. the :lanes comes at the end. I.e. destination:colour:lanes instead of destination:lanes:colour. I've fixed this here.

For future reference, you can test signs here:

http://osm.mueschelsoft.de/destinations/example/sandbox.htm#country=IT&tags=%20%20bicycle%20=%20no%0A%20%20destination:lanes%20=%20Autostrada%20A22;Autostrada%20A4;Mantova;Tangenziale%20sud;Aeroporto|Brescia;Trento%0A%20%20destination:colour:lanes%20=%20green;green;blue;green;white|blue;blue;brown;brown%0A%20%20destination:ref:lanes%20=%20A22;A4;;;|SS11;SS12%0A%20%20destination:symbol:lanes%20=%20;;;motorway;airport|%0A%20%20foot%20=%20no%0A%20%20highway%20=%20trunk%0A%20%20horse%20=%20no%0A%20%20lanes%20=%202%0A%20%20maxspeed%20=%2060%0A%20%20oneway%20=%20yes%0A%20%20ref%20=%20T4-T9%0A%20%20surface%20=%20asphalt

I do that a lot when adding destination tags, just to make sure the rendered sign bears some resemblance to the original.
Jacopo (2024-09-24 12:00:11+00:00): Hi Ygramul, thanks for commenting. 
I'll make sure to follow this indication going forward. 
Thanks also for the testing tool for the signs, much appreciated.
Ciao
woodpeck_repair (2024-09-24 11:24:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 157034782 where the changeset comment is: revert edits by Yuri Skvortsov afer https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16696 was ignored
woodpeck_repair (2024-09-24 11:25:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 157034782 where the changeset comment is: revert edits by Yuri Skvortsov afer https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16696 was ignored
woodpeck_repair (2024-09-24 11:24:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 157034782 where the changeset comment is: revert edits by Yuri Skvortsov afer https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16696 was ignored
woodpeck_repair (2024-09-24 11:24:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 157034782 where the changeset comment is: revert edits by Yuri Skvortsov afer https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16696 was ignored
woodpeck_repair (2024-09-24 11:25:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 157034782 where the changeset comment is: revert edits by Yuri Skvortsov afer https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16696 was ignored
woodpeck_repair (2024-09-24 11:24:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 157034782 where the changeset comment is: revert edits by Yuri Skvortsov afer https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16696 was ignored
woodpeck_repair (2024-09-24 11:24:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 157034782 where the changeset comment is: revert edits by Yuri Skvortsov afer https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16696 was ignored
Nzau (2025-06-23 14:28:00+00:00): Bonjour Arthurd,
S'il s'agit d'une voie verte (C115), il faut remplacer highway=cycleway par highway=path ^^
woodpeck_repair (2024-09-24 11:24:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 157034782 where the changeset comment is: revert edits by Yuri Skvortsov afer https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16696 was ignored
Nakaner-repair (2025-08-12 15:43:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 170348716 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by Rostas Krisztian: low-quality edits by MAPS.ME, see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/134066
woodpeck_repair (2024-09-24 11:24:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 157034782 where the changeset comment is: revert edits by Yuri Skvortsov afer https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16696 was ignored
woodpeck_repair (2024-09-24 11:24:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 157034782 where the changeset comment is: revert edits by Yuri Skvortsov afer https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16696 was ignored
woodpeck_repair (2024-09-24 11:24:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 157034782 where the changeset comment is: revert edits by Yuri Skvortsov afer https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16696 was ignored
woodpeck_repair (2024-09-24 11:24:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 157034782 where the changeset comment is: revert edits by Yuri Skvortsov afer https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16696 was ignored
woodpeck_repair (2024-09-24 11:24:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 157034782 where the changeset comment is: revert edits by Yuri Skvortsov afer https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16696 was ignored
woodpeck_repair (2024-09-24 11:24:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 157034782 where the changeset comment is: revert edits by Yuri Skvortsov afer https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16696 was ignored
woodpeck_repair (2024-09-24 11:25:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 157034782 where the changeset comment is: revert edits by Yuri Skvortsov afer https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16696 was ignored
woodpeck_repair (2024-09-24 11:24:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 157034782 where the changeset comment is: revert edits by Yuri Skvortsov afer https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16696 was ignored
woodpeck_repair (2024-09-24 11:24:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 157034782 where the changeset comment is: revert edits by Yuri Skvortsov afer https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16696 was ignored
woodpeck_repair (2024-09-24 11:24:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 157034782 where the changeset comment is: revert edits by Yuri Skvortsov afer https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16696 was ignored
puma515 (2024-09-23 12:16:11+00:00): Hallo, da du deine änderungen mit dem vermerk bitte überprüfen erstellt hast habe ich mir die mal angesehen.
Deine erfassung der Baustelle ist soweit Ok nur hast du bei 2 Kreuzungen je ein Node verschoben wodurch die Straße dort nun komische harken hatte. 
Das passirt leider manchmal wen man beim Bildauschnitt verschieben einen Node ausversehen noch mit angeklickt hat. 
Ich habe die betroffenen Nodes schon zurück gesetzt somit brauchst du dort nichts mehr anpassen. 

Bitte erstelle entweder ein Hinweis oder ändere die Straße wieder wen die Baustelle dort vorausichtlich im Dezember fertig ist. 

Es gibt leider manchmal ein problem das Baustellen zwar korekt erfasst werden aber später dann kein Mapper in der Region vor ort aktiv ist der es wieder ändert wen es erldigt ist. 

Schön gruß 
puma515
Tom Nickels (2024-09-23 12:48:17+00:00): Alles klar, danke für den Check ich behalte die Baustelle im Auge...
LG
woodpeck_repair (2024-09-24 11:24:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 157034782 where the changeset comment is: revert edits by Yuri Skvortsov afer https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16696 was ignored
woodpeck_repair (2024-09-24 11:24:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 157034782 where the changeset comment is: revert edits by Yuri Skvortsov afer https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16696 was ignored
woodpeck_repair (2024-09-24 11:24:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 157034782 where the changeset comment is: revert edits by Yuri Skvortsov afer https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16696 was ignored
woodpeck_repair (2024-09-24 11:24:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 157034782 where the changeset comment is: revert edits by Yuri Skvortsov afer https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16696 was ignored
woodpeck_repair (2024-09-24 11:24:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 157034782 where the changeset comment is: revert edits by Yuri Skvortsov afer https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16696 was ignored
woodpeck_repair (2024-09-24 11:24:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 157034782 where the changeset comment is: revert edits by Yuri Skvortsov afer https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16696 was ignored
woodpeck_repair (2024-09-24 11:24:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 157034782 where the changeset comment is: revert edits by Yuri Skvortsov afer https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16696 was ignored
woodpeck_repair (2024-09-24 11:25:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 157034782 where the changeset comment is: revert edits by Yuri Skvortsov afer https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16696 was ignored
woodpeck_repair (2024-09-24 11:25:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 157034782 where the changeset comment is: revert edits by Yuri Skvortsov afer https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16696 was ignored
woodpeck_repair (2024-09-24 11:24:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 157034782 where the changeset comment is: revert edits by Yuri Skvortsov afer https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16696 was ignored
NeisBot (2024-09-23 09:04:38+00:00): Hi TheKamilra, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 3 building(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=156984621
TheKamilra (2024-09-23 10:02:50+00:00): I confirm these deletions were intentional
pitscheplatsch (2024-09-24 05:47:34+00:00): Thank you for your response.

#HappyMapping
woodpeck_repair (2024-09-24 11:24:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 157034782 where the changeset comment is: revert edits by Yuri Skvortsov afer https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16696 was ignored
osmviborg (2024-09-23 10:34:44+00:00): Vejdirektoratet er vejbestyrer, 'operator=Vejdirektoratet'
hmjdk (2024-09-23 12:03:21+00:00): Ikke i følge den centrale vej og sti fortegnelse. 
https://cvf.vd.dk/cvf/hvemejervejen.jsp
Så er det kommunevej og dermed kommunen, der står for drift og vedligehold. 
Det gælder en lang række veje på sydsjælland og lolland falster, som trænger til en oprydning.
osmviborg (2024-09-23 14:59:58+00:00): Vejdirektoratet er rute- bestyrer, det er selvfølgelig noget andet.
woodpeck_repair (2024-09-24 11:24:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 157034782 where the changeset comment is: revert edits by Yuri Skvortsov afer https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16696 was ignored
rskedgell (2024-09-23 10:03:23+00:00): Thanks for adding these, but please bear in mind a couple of things, which are also in the MapWithAI instructions for this task:

1) "Once you have mapped a section of sidewalk, you should add a tag to the adjacent road to inform OpenStreetMap whether a sidewalk exists next to that road and which sides it is on. You can do that by applying one of the following sidewalk:both=separate, sidewalk:left=separate, sidewalk:right=separate to the adjacent road. If no sidewalk exists, you can use sidewalk=no."

2) Please don't change crossing=traffic_signals to crossing=marked, as that removed information useful to pedestrian routers. By all means add crossing:markings=dots and crossing:signals=yes. If you see a crossing in the UK marked with dots and there's a solid white stop line adjacent to it, it's very, very unlikely that it is anything other than crossing=traffic_signals + crossing:markings=dots + crossing:signals=yes.

Although the iD editor and derivatives like Rapid suggest it, there's no point adding crossing:markings=yes, as this rather pointlessly tells data consumers that "this marked crossing is marked".

I've fixed the tagging errors with crossings and added sidewalk tags to the parent roads in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156987362
woodpeck_repair (2024-09-24 11:24:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 157034782 where the changeset comment is: revert edits by Yuri Skvortsov afer https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16696 was ignored
woodpeck_repair (2024-09-24 11:25:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 157034782 where the changeset comment is: revert edits by Yuri Skvortsov afer https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16696 was ignored
woodpeck_repair (2024-09-24 11:24:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 157034782 where the changeset comment is: revert edits by Yuri Skvortsov afer https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16696 was ignored
Frans S (2024-09-23 10:06:16+00:00): Hello again.
Why do you add a layer to a building  To hide errors?  Just solve the error!
You also did not solve the issues shown by the issue triangle before you uploaded your mappings.
Again,  select easier task to start with. Your mappings gives so much work to get the issues solved.
Best regards
Frans S (2024-09-23 10:15:20+00:00): Hello again.
I removed 66 out of 80 mappings here.
Main reason, clustered or poorly mapped buildings.
Bes regards
eggie (2024-09-23 09:57:46+00:00): Het was hier goed getagd..
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=156984941
Het zou zomaar kunnen dat dit gewoon gaat routeren voor regulier verkeer. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:emergency
access=no icm met emergency=yes zal dan gewoon voor hulpdiensten werken.
access=emergency staat niet beschreven in de wiki volgens mij.. althans ik kan het niet vinden
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-09-23 10:06:22+00:00): De tagging bij een C1 bord
is
vehicle=no
horse=no
en dan
emergency=designated om het C1 bord te overrulen.
De rest van je toevoegingen kunnen wel. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-09-23 10:24:07+00:00): Ik heb even een draadje geopend voor wat advies
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/accesstagging-voor-hulpdiensten/119146

Je zou het volgende week als de routers zijn bijgewerkt kunnen checken met de OSM routers of het niet gaat routeren.
eggie (2024-09-23 11:35:45+00:00): De tagging heb ik als bovenstaan aangepast...  De toegangsweg op het terrein met ik op access=no gezet icm met emergency=designated  Ook op de slagbomen emergency designated toegevoegd. 
Die staan per default op slot voor motorvoertuigen.
Is het geen inrit en een uitrit. Dus geen oneway=yes nodig?

Zie ook motivatie op het forumdraadje. 

MVG
eggie
woodpeck_repair (2024-09-24 11:25:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 157034782 where the changeset comment is: revert edits by Yuri Skvortsov afer https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16696 was ignored
woodpeck_repair (2024-09-24 11:25:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 157034782 where the changeset comment is: revert edits by Yuri Skvortsov afer https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16696 was ignored
woodpeck_repair (2024-09-24 11:24:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 157034782 where the changeset comment is: revert edits by Yuri Skvortsov afer https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16696 was ignored
woodpeck_repair (2024-09-24 11:24:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 157034782 where the changeset comment is: revert edits by Yuri Skvortsov afer https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16696 was ignored
woodpeck_repair (2024-09-24 11:24:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 157034782 where the changeset comment is: revert edits by Yuri Skvortsov afer https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16696 was ignored
woodpeck_repair (2024-09-24 11:25:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 157034782 where the changeset comment is: revert edits by Yuri Skvortsov afer https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16696 was ignored
woodpeck_repair (2024-09-24 11:25:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 157034782 where the changeset comment is: revert edits by Yuri Skvortsov afer https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16696 was ignored
woodpeck_repair (2024-09-24 11:25:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 157034782 where the changeset comment is: revert edits by Yuri Skvortsov afer https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16696 was ignored
zorglubu (2024-09-25 15:01:39+00:00): Bonjour,

L'attribut building est inapproprié sur le contour d'un terrain, il désigne un bâtiment. D'autre part l'attribut layer=1 est inutile, car il est utilisé pour indiquer qu'un objet est au dessus d'un autre, ce qui n'est pas le cas ici.

Je me permets de supprimer ces deux attributs.
woodpeck_repair (2024-09-24 11:24:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 157034782 where the changeset comment is: revert edits by Yuri Skvortsov afer https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16696 was ignored
woodpeck_repair (2024-09-24 11:25:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 157034782 where the changeset comment is: revert edits by Yuri Skvortsov afer https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16696 was ignored
woodpeck_repair (2024-09-24 11:24:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 157034782 where the changeset comment is: revert edits by Yuri Skvortsov afer https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16696 was ignored
addyx (2024-09-23 09:36:29+00:00): I'm not sure if I inadvertently broke any relations. JOSM warned me about these two route relations: Old National Highway 209 and NH948

Can somebody please check if these relations need to be updated? Also, help appreciated on how I can handle this myself in the future.
marc__marc (2024-09-23 16:38:15+00:00): Bonjour,
Merci pour les améliorations concernant les coupe-feu.
Pourriez-vous me dire ce qu'il y a d'illégal au sentier qui débutait à cet endroit https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1987573706 dans le Bois Chincul ? un panneau interdit de continuer vers le sud comme de nombreuses personnes l'ont pourtant fait ?
Concernant les effacements :
La politique du projet est de cartographier ce qui est vérifiable sur le terrain. Si un sentier existe il a sa place dans la base de données. Ce qui est possible de faire (et ce qui doit être fait), c'est de marquer ce sentier comme interdit à tout le monde avec highway=path + access=no (comme vous l'aviez fait précédement) ou avec not:highway=path s'il y a une raison impérieuse style réserve naturelle)

Il y a plusieurs raisons pour cette décision :
    En ne supprimant pas les sentiers interdit, il est possible d'indiquer très clairement que ces sentiers ne sont pas ouverts au public. Si le sentier est supprimé, il n'est pas possible de savoir qu'il est privé.
    Si le sentier est supprimé, il est très probable qu'un autre contributeur l'ajoutera à nouveau, surtout avec la disponibilité d'images aériennes en libre accès et de très grande précision qui facilitent grandement la cartographie à distance (et donc sans pouvoir deviner que le sentier est illégal au regard du station de réserve naturelle).

Cordialement,
Marc
marc__marc (2024-09-23 17:44:44+00:00): Vous avez aussi effacé un coupe-feu https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1302467941/history
c'est une erreur ? on voit une trace dans la végétation sur l'imagerie sat.

Le sentier qui menait au pont, vous pensez que c'était aussi illégal et si oui en vertu de quoi ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/394957914/history

et cette piste forestière https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/340706002/history ?
Shagrat01 (2024-09-30 06:34:03+00:00): Bonjour Monsieur,

Je comprends, j’avais d’abord indiqué ce sentier en interdit mais je ne vois pas bien comment les gens voient qu’il est interdit. Même si la couleur était légèrement différente, les usagers n’ayant pas l’habitude des interdictions, ils n’y feraient pas attention. Il me semble indispensable qu’on ne l’emprunte plus. J’ai d’ailleurs placé des barrières l’an passé qu’on m’a déjà retiré plusieurs fois. La trace débute après un chemin de débardage qui finit en cul de sac. Il était tentant aux usagers de le prolonger et de faire le raccourcis pour arriver aux Digues, ce qui a créé cette trace. Elle arrivait dans ce qui est actuellement une propriété privée, où une maison vient d’être rénovée. Une deuxième sortie a été créée arrivant sur le chemin par un talus. 
Ce sentier me dérange tout particulièrement parce bien qu’il ne traverse pas une réserve naturelle, il traverse la seule zone de tout le massif que nous laissons évoluer librement (réserve forestière intégrale=RFI). La RFI n’a pas de statut juridique mais juste un objectif de gestion interne au DNF. Néanmoins la zone est très intéressante d’un point de vue des espèces animales rares qui s’y cantonnent. Une d’entre elles, un oiseau est particulièrement sensible au dérangement. Pour toutes ces raisons, je voudrais que cette trace ne soit plus empruntée et le mieux, je pense serait qu’elle n’apparaisse plus sur les cartes. Sinon, peut-être qu’on peut l’indiquer comme layon et faire apparaitre les barrières. Qu’en pensez-vous ?

Les liens ne fonctionnent pas hormis le second dont il s’agit d’une trace partant du pavillon Renard et descendant vers le ruisseau par les rochers. Cette zone est le début de la RFI  dont je vous ai parlé. Le code forestier nous permet de fermer les traces. En le faisant, elles disparaitront rapidement des vues aériennes. Ce n'est pas un pont mais une passerelle étroite en béton qui est vieille et non sécurisée. Je la ferai enlever!

N’hésitez pas à me renvoyer les liens des 2 autres changements!

Bien cordialement,

Fabian Lejeune
marczoutendijk (2025-08-19 12:00:25+00:00): Hallo,

Graag wil ik weten of je test met landuse=gravel succesvol is.
Waarom gebruik je niet surface=gravel (icm area=yes) voor dat stukje?
landuse=gravel wordt in de wiki (en met reden!) niet genoemd als mogelijk geldige combinatie.

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
Op'tRad (2025-08-20 06:46:48+00:00): Hallo Marc,
Ik ben dat stukje vergeten en herinner me niet meer waar het om ging, maar ik zal er nog eens naar kijken. Ik vermoed dat het was omdat ik constateerde dat de grintbakken op het Circuit Zandvoort als zand (natural sand?) gemapt stonden. Ik wilde daar niet aan het experimenteren en op zoek gaaan naar de juiste tag. Uiteindelijk vond ik de juiste tag trouwens waar ik hem zocht: op IJsland. Natural shingle heb ik er van gemaakt. OSM is door de vele mogelijkheden niet zo eenvoudig en ik weet inmiddels dat je via (in een zoekmachine:) 'osm tag *********' eigenlijk alle tags moet nakijken om te kijken welk doel ze precies dienen en welke niet.
Groet,
Werner
eggie (2024-09-23 10:00:33+00:00): Je hebt Maelsonstraat 6 verplaatst naar een ander gebied op de kaart. Oorzaak meestal schuiven met de kaart in editmodus. 
Op de doorsteek moet volgens mij gewoon access=no.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-09-23 10:01:13+00:00): Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=156986003