piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2026-03-07 14:51:09+00:00): De twee bosgebieden heb ik samengevoegd..  Dat doe ik met één van die gereedschapskisten. De multipolygoon die een gebied was geworden met ik verwijderd. 
Die mp's ontstaan omdat je de polygoon van het vlak had onderbroken. 
gr eggie
eggie (2026-03-07 14:56:25+00:00): Neu.. niet opgeven. Je begint wel meteen met moeilijke zaken voor starters. 

Java installeren is niet moeilijk. JOSM heeft verschillende installaties.
Er is ook een webversie. 
Je moet ergens eemmalig je osm account invoeren, maar ik geef toe... simpel is het allemaal niet.
Wanneer je iD blijft gebruiken (kan ook) dan de nodes( knopen)  moet laten aansluiten... anders krijg je overlap. Dat geeft dan weer foutmeldingen.
eggie (2026-03-07 15:55:38+00:00): Diemerboapad aangepast naar Diemerbospad
PWeder (2026-03-08 10:17:04+00:00): Oeps, ja, er lopen veel boas in Diemen rond, maar niet in het Gaasperpark dus ;-)
eggie (2026-03-07 15:13:24+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  Het was hier dubbel gemapt. Ik heb nu alle info verplaatst naar de adresnode.

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Zeust (2026-03-07 16:53:35+00:00): Ah oeps! Komt dat omdat ik eerst openingstijden heb toegevoegd en toen in een aparte edit nog een annotatie met de bronvermelding terwijl mijn eerste edit nog aan het syncen was o.i.d.? Ik hoop in ieder geval dat dit niet nog een keer gebeurt, en zo wel dan moet ik misschien onder water kijken wat CoMaps precies doet als ik in de app een edit maak. In ieder geval bedankt voor de feedback!
eggie (2026-03-07 17:12:41+00:00): Hoi...  Tja die apps hebben allemaal hun beperkingen. k Zie in ieder geval vaak onvolledige adressen zonder city.. en echt overzicht heb je ook niet.

Mapse,
eggie
eggie (2026-03-07 17:13:22+00:00): Zal straks nog even kijken waarom het nog niet rendert. information hoort gewoon te renderen.
Enock4seth (2026-04-25 18:31:20+00:00): Hi  NACHINDI _ ABDUL _RAUF, zoom in to see existing features to avoid adding duplicates like this one. Also use Title case for names and avoid UPPERCASE.
蕉饼电脑 (2026-03-07 20:32:52+00:00): w/1316112052 是栏杆分隔的非机动车道，为什么改为人行道？
Yitzchak M (2026-07-16 08:12:27+00:00): למה הוספת בחזרה את מספר מסלול של וועדת השבילים? הם הכריזו שזה אסור להדפיס בכל מפה את המספר המסלול שלהם (זכות היוצר).
(By the way, I am an English-speaker)
ylivny (2026-07-17 11:54:49+00:00): Had no idea it is not allowed
Yitzchak M (2026-07-17 14:01:24+00:00): Nobody did, until a couple of years ago when Israel Hiking Map/Mapeak got a threatening letter from the Israel Trail Committee's attorneys threatening a lawsuit if they showed ITC's trail numbers on the Israel Hiking Map. Thumbs down to the ITC for lack of public cooperation. I removed the ref number from the relation. It serves no purpose to be included in OSM. Israel Hiking Map will not show it even if it exists in OSM.
TheNightRider (2026-03-20 14:44:18+00:00): Hi, I normally just map Superchargers in the US because that keeps me busy, but I noticed this one showed up as expanded on https://supercharge.info. I updated ref:supercharge_info because that should be a number (244), as in https://supercharge.info/map?siteID=244

Also, iD (OSM web-based editor) wanted to "upgrade" the station to a Tesla Destination Charger, so had to add not:brand:wikidata=Q478214 to prevent that.

By the way, what are the ref:tesla and ref:tesla2 tags used for? They are not present on any of the Tesla Superchargers mapped in the United States. Maybe they are old and not used anymore, especially the ref:tesla2?
TheNightRider (2026-03-20 14:45:06+00:00): Also, did Tesla upgrade the 8 original posts to 250 kW or leave them at 150 kW? In the US they usually upgrade the old 120/125/150 kW posts when there is an expansion, but they often leave the 250 kW posts (V3) when they add 325 kW posts (V4). In the EU the V4 posts might only output 250 kW. Tesla does not document on their website if a station has a mixture, so it's up to websites like supercharge.info, nobil.no, and OSM to keep track of this. :)
stillhart (2026-03-21 21:09:47+00:00): Yes, I made an accident and mapped multiple ref:supercharge_info with the tesla ref. I assumed that somehow or may read that wrong somewhere. Now I'm correcting slowly. adding ref:tesla add the same time. ref:tesla is the id that tesla references. can usually be seen all urls on the tesla website related to that charger. Should make it easier in the future to reference it.

ref:tesla2, no idea, not mine :-)

In Europe i have seen both. Replace or just expand, it depends. But on the charging station we should reference the max. man_made charge points can of course be more specific. 

At least that's how I understand it.
stillhart (2026-03-21 21:10:39+00:00): btw, just started mapping supercharger in the north america. I hope I don't fuck it up. :-)
TheNightRider (2026-03-22 06:12:33+00:00): Ha ha! Welcome to the club. I was concerned that I had fucked up this station in Norway. :) I saw that this Tesla Supercharger had 2 cables in the past, and I'm not sure which they were using. Were they the original Tesla plug (that does both AC and DC) and a CSS Combo 2 (for higher-power DC)? Or was it the Mennekes (Type2) plug? 
By the way, the Tesla plug got standardized by SAE International (formerly the Society of Automotive Engineers) and is now called  NACS (North American Charging System). Japan and South Korea also use NACS.
Stellantis just last week announced they would start putting NACS ports on their cars, at least for North America.
Carto'Cité (2026-07-22 14:20:42+00:00): Bonjour Aurélien.
J'ai restauré le tag ref sur les quais de SQY. Ce tag est utilisé par les applications Transilien et est documenté sur le wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Dplatform).
Antoine de Carto’Cité pour SNCF Transilien
蕉饼电脑 (2026-03-07 20:25:55+00:00): w/1486308922 是地表有痕迹的道口。你之前把104国道标为桥梁，现在怎么还把铁路标为隧道？
hatul (2026-05-13 21:02:19+00:00): שלום יונתן

ביחס של סובב מכתש רמון השבילים הופיעו בכוונה פעמיים כי יש קטעים של הלוך וחזור. זה מאפשר סדר וייצוא נוח.
ylivny (2026-05-14 05:38:50+00:00): שלום חתול

האם זו הדרך הנכונה לייצג מקרה כזה?
hatul (2026-05-14 06:37:04+00:00): זאת הדרך הכי טובה שמצאתי. מוזמן להציע דרך אחרת.
ylivny (2026-05-14 06:57:56+00:00): אולי כדאי לפתוח על זה דיון בפורום.

תוכל להסביר איך זה עזר?
hatul (2026-05-14 09:12:59+00:00): זה הפך את המסלו ללקו שלם שאפשר לייצא.
אולי כדאי להוסיף פעמיים עם role=forward ו־role=backward
ylivny (2026-05-14 09:24:13+00:00): למה לא להוסיף רק פעם אחת בצירוף role=side_trip?
hatul (2026-05-14 10:01:25+00:00): כי זה חלק רשמי מהשביל שהולכים פעמיים
ylivny (2026-05-14 10:40:34+00:00): יכול להפנות אותי למקטע הרלוונטי? 

וגם - איך אתה מייצא את ה relation?
hatul (2026-05-14 18:37:53+00:00): יש כמה מקטעים.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/91600784
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/91767460
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/560991281
הם חלק מטבעת אל בורות לוץ שחלקים ממנה הלוך וחזור.

ייצאתי בדרך כלל דרך ihm אבל גם Waymarked Trails מסתבך ומפצל את השביל לכמה חלקים.
https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=6148296&type=relation&map=14.0/30.5181/34.6735
ylivny (2026-05-21 13:43:52+00:00): אחרי התייעצות בפורום הוספתיאת הקטעים וסידרתי אותם.

עכשיו שמורידים את המסלול ב Waymarked Trails הוא מופיע כמסלול אחד רציף
hatul (2026-05-24 08:09:35+00:00): מצוין, תודה
ScottWalkerAU (2026-03-08 00:18:19+00:00): Is this actually signposted as one-way? Does that mean residents leaving their house can't use the roundabout? I thought it was technically dual-way
Grass-snake (2026-03-10 17:54:36+00:00): Здравствуйте, обращаю внимание что Вы неправильно отредактировали мультиполигон (он должен состоять только из замкнутых контуров, отдельные дороги добавлять неправильно, это портит данные в базе).
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5308249

Также вопрос, Вам обязательно указывать name=Заячья Гора на дороге? Если адресация идёт по микрорайону, то уже есть place=neighbourhood, на дорогах не требуется.
Alex_Hells (2026-03-16 14:22:39+00:00): по п.1 - прошу прощения, видимо не до конца разобрался с функционалом.
по п.2 поставил для перестраховки, адресация идет по микрорайону
eggie (2026-03-07 15:43:34+00:00): Vier wandelroutes hersteld.
PWeder (2026-03-07 15:44:39+00:00): Super, dankjewel
eggie (2026-03-07 15:46:51+00:00): Zie nu dat er langs die bankjes links de route ook had kunnen lopen. Nu gaat de route oostwaarts. 
Het kan ook via de bankjes
eggie (2026-03-07 15:52:37+00:00): De wandelroutes..
https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#?map=18.0/52.3087/4.9876
De mutaties aan  routes zie je eigenlijk direct. De kaart zelf loopt nog achter.
PierZen (2026-03-07 19:51:24+00:00): Vous avez renversé mes éditions des rivières Vincelotte et Laforge pour la deuxième fois et refusé de discuter.  Je vous demande de cesser d'éditer dans cette zone du projet de la Baie James et venir discuter avec la communauté et trouver une solution à ce conflit d'édition 
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/ou-sont-les-rivieres-vincelotte-et-laforge-un-detective-a-la-recherche-de-la-riviere-sous-le-reservoir/142102
Kovoschiz (2026-03-08 10:27:57+00:00): Why are you delete them???
vectorial8192 (2026-03-08 16:15:13+00:00): Chill.

These local-only roads do not have any irl maxspeed signs. The maxspeed aspect is better handled/described by country rules.

You may notice that I basically only add maxspeed to explicitly-signed roads and "roads that look like proper highways (eg Ma On Shan Bypass)". I also extend these maxspeed information towards the next junction down the road, which should be uncontroversial.

This is not the kind of "haha delet this" random action that is often done by newcomers.
vectorial8192 (2026-03-08 16:19:08+00:00): Conversely, let's say hypothetically these roads never had any maxspeed info ever since OSM was founded. It still wouldn't make sense to suddenly add maxspeed to them.

"Adding 50km/h everywhere" should be used sparingly as band-aid fixes when in the past the various routers can't understand speed correctly, but now is not the past, we (nearly) have the tech and are improving it, we just don't need to do that anymore.
Kovoschiz (2026-03-09 17:26:28+00:00): You can compare eg `maxspeed:type=` still adding `maxspeed=`
vectorial8192 (2026-03-10 12:40:41+00:00): This implies we can/may add `maxspeed:type` etc to all the roads in Hong Kong. That's gonna be too much work. At least I will just stay out of this kind of implicit `maxspeed=*` in the future.
Kovoschiz (2026-03-10 19:07:18+00:00): The suggestion is to distinguish by `maxspeed:type=` `=sign` vs `=HK` (`=HK:urban` etc are wrong), not removing `maxspeed=`
joshnolan (2026-03-09 18:21:38+00:00): Shalom, welcome to Israel!🙃
I've noticed you enhanced this Supercharger station.
May I ask why did you update `ref:supercharge_info` to Tesla's reference (`ref` tag)?
Are you familiar with supercharge.info? (https://supercharge.info/map?siteID=7705)
stillhart (2026-03-09 19:05:06+00:00): Oh shit, I thought the use the Tesla ID?!? 🗿

I will verify and cleanup.
Jrachi (2026-03-08 06:42:22+00:00): Ciao.
Perché hai aggiunto la way 1486316377 alla relazione 15937801 (EVCA768A) ? 
Forse hai visto una tabella segnaletica che fa pensare che sia così?
Si tratta di un cartello di avvicinamento, o forse un errore di posizionamento, in tal caso potresti inserire nella relazione un old_ref, o una nota sul guidepost?

Ivo
Davide Brolit (2026-03-08 09:57:59+00:00): Ciao Ivo, ti riferisci a quel breve tratto vero?
In realtà ho solamente ripristinato quello che già c'era, cerco di spiegarmi.
Il sentiero way/1486316376 (segnavia 768) era mappato partendo dall'incrocio poco più giù, dove arriva il sentiero 770 da sud; da lì partiva anche la strada sterrata che prosegue a nord fino alla vetta del Fenera, relazionata come 768A.
Da sopralluogo ho rilevato che il way/1486316376 non parte lì, ma un po' più su; ho quindi diviso in due il sentiero way/205042128, creando quel nuovo tratto e relazionandolo ancora col 768A, per poter collegare il 768 nel posto giusto e aggiornare correttamente anche la relazione.
Sul posto, tra l'altro, il 768A non esiste nemmeno (è indicato come 770), ma essendo che vanno a catasto non ho modificato nulla e mi sono limitato a ripristinare quello che già c'era.
Spero di essermi spiegato bene, fammi sapere
Jrachi (2026-03-08 10:39:41+00:00): Capito.
Hai modificato la way, solo che non era corretto mettere quel tratto nel 768A.
Purtroppo il 768A è a catasto ma manca ancora il rilievo ufficiale, me lo metto in calendario di riempire la lacuna.

Ivo
Jrachi (2026-03-08 10:42:51+00:00): Mi correggo!
Il 768A è gia stato prenotato da un rilevatori CAI, assieme al 770 anch'esso mancante di rilievo ufficiale

Ivo
Davide Brolit (2026-03-08 11:00:16+00:00): Forse ho capito... Non è corretto perchè, essendo il 768A una variante del 768, dovrebbe staccarsi da questo e non comprendere un tratto in comune, giusto?
Jrachi (2026-03-08 15:59:41+00:00): Si, esatto.
I percorsi a catasto hanno un codice univoco. Non possono avere un tratto in comune.
Eccezione è quando i due percorsi si incrociano su una piazza o incrocio largo, per OSM potrebbe esserci una sovrapposizione, ma per il catasto si tollerano tratti con un massimo 10-20 metri di sovrapposizione.
Davide Brolit (2026-03-08 23:43:20+00:00): Terrò a mente, grazie!
Константин Гам (2026-03-23 08:14:49+00:00): Здравствуйте!

Пожалуйста не устраивайте войну правок.
Пожалуйста описание к пакету правок.
Пожалуйста реагируйте на чужие описания.

Если здесь НЕТ стройки и доступ реально свободный, то удалите её. Однако из данных карты следует что тут ошибка навигации, открытые для навигации дорожки по стройке.

Либо нельзя сюда заходить, либо надо снести стройку. Пожалуйста, исправьте по факту, а не полу-мерами...
Peter_Otp (2026-03-28 14:16:35+00:00): Добрый день, Константин! Я живу рядом с лесопарком Юнтолово и постоянно там гуляю - там где обозначена стройка экопарка - по сути ее уже нет. Нет никаких заборов и ограждений и признаков соответствующей деятельности - проход по территории так называемой стройки совершенно свободный - все там гуляют.
bxl-forever (2026-03-07 17:30:00+00:00): Hello,

Thanks for noticing that railway tracks have changed in this area.  But I regret to inform you that this is a damaging edit.  While changing the layout of the railway tracks you broke the continuity of railway relations.

I imagine you just just wanted to help.  The simple online editor is unfortunately not a suitable tool to edit complicated structures, like route relations.  I will try to repair this now.
tguen (2026-03-12 02:36:46+00:00): The name tag for a business should match the sign on the outside. Please don't add other info like "not open yet". See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

McMenamins name should be changed back too. Its min_age tag is not valid, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:min_age

Some tags are assumed by default and adding them is not necessary, like oneway=no on streets.
tguen (2026-03-19 01:54:18+00:00): 👀
tguen (2026-03-27 02:59:02+00:00): 👀
osmviborg (2026-03-07 16:25:11+00:00): Don't use 'Bing' in DK, use 'SDFI Aerial Imagery'. When aligning buildings, don't use the roof, the 'SDFI Screenmap' shows the footprint of the building. Better use that.
kamillz (2026-03-07 23:41:21+00:00): oh oki. i didnt realize that. i was using JOSM. is there a good place to learn all these things specific to denmark?
osmviborg (2026-03-08 07:21:38+00:00): The wiki, dansk, but it is more or less a translation of the English.
wireguy (2026-04-14 22:45:44+00:00): Hi Hell,  you updated the info for El Mexicano, but the phone number has too many digits.   Can you take a look and correct?   thx
hellflower (2026-04-14 23:36:51+00:00): Thanks for pointing that out, I fixed it
rene78 (2026-03-10 15:24:58+00:00): Hi Tonushka,

I noticed that some features were deleted when they were no longer in use. In OpenStreetMap it’s usually preferred to keep such objects and mark them with the `disused:` (or sometimes `abandoned:`) prefix instead of deleting them outright.

Keeping the objects helps preserve the mapping history and can also be useful if the feature still physically exists but is simply not operating anymore.

So for example, instead of removing a shop that has closed, it is often better to change
`shop=...` → `disused:shop=...`.

Just wanted to mention this in case it’s helpful for future edits. Thanks for contributing to OSM!
9_tab (2026-03-07 17:24:51+00:00): Why did you change these? 
I prefer using documented tags. "year" is problematic as pointless as "date".
mueschel (2026-03-07 18:48:19+00:00): "artwork_creation:year" is neither documented nor used in any place. 
According to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dartwork it should be 'start_date', but I also recently talked to someone who preferred 'year'...
9_tab (2026-03-07 18:57:57+00:00): Good points. It should have been https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:artwork:creation_year
mueschel (2026-03-07 21:12:41+00:00): Has this tag been discussed before the wiki page has been created? It's description is in contradiction to what is documented on tourism=artwork.
9_tab (2026-03-07 21:19:04+00:00): I don't think so. tourism=artwork doesn't mention year=, date= either. It also not that consistent with start_date= itself.
Aleks-Berlin (2026-03-09 12:15:25+00:00): Hallo EST19,
please write wikipedia="de:Abcd" not "http..", see details here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikipedia#Examples
Thanks, Alex
EST19 (2026-03-13 16:09:40+00:00): Hi Alex.... danke !!.... 
Werde aufpassen und aufmerksam sein, nächstes mal...!!. 
Liebe Grüße , Hans Alexander 

Hi Alex....thanks..!!.. 
Will watch out and be more accurate next time...!!... 
Greetings, Hans Alexander
SomeoneElse (2026-03-07 17:20:04+00:00): The car park building is visible under construction from Esri and Mapbox imagery, but was actually completed a couple of years ago.  The car park extends west out of the building.  

It is unclear how the parking aisle crosses Steeton Brook; my guess is that that is completely covered now (I didn't look).

I saw no indication of any charging suggesting it is free.  https://www.yorkshire.com/sutton-in-craven/parking/steeton-silsden also suggests free but council map has a misnamed pay car park located here.  Previous OSM status was pay.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2026-03-09 11:40:04+00:00): There is no such project. Pure fantasy.
KennyDap (2026-03-08 02:50:48+00:00): Yes, that's bad. The default language should be the one used in the region. If you're just learning mapping, start with small objects, not large entities.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179516851
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-16 10:50:24+00:00): Cleaned up remaining SEO spam and other tagging for POI in changeset 184175578

https://osm.org/changeset/184175578
LingM (2026-03-17 19:17:19+00:00): Sicher, dass die LBS Donnerstags nur Nachmittags geöffnet hat? Laut Webseite haben die auch am Do von 9-12 Uhr offen.
LingM (2026-03-18 14:44:28+00:00): Bei Metzgerei Rimmele passen die Öffnungszeiten auch nicht zu denen auf der Webseite.
Fraxi (2026-03-07 18:56:42+00:00): Здравей!
"Мекичарница" по принцип е описателно/нарицателно име.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions
Може би е по-добре таговете да са shop=bakery/shop=fast_food+cuisine=mekitsa примерно. А понеже видях от фейсбук страницата, че пише "Мекичарница Пловдив", може би е добре да се сложи като name=Пловдив?
Fraxi (2026-03-07 18:59:34+00:00): Т.е. amenity=fast_food :) Разбра ме...
Dimitar155 (2026-03-07 20:15:52+00:00): "Мекичарница" е допустимо изключение, но не съм безпристрастен в този случай 😋
Fraxi (2026-03-07 21:12:48+00:00): Е, дай тогава и баничарниците да станат "допустими изключения" :P
mechka (2026-03-12 16:08:22+00:00): промените са направени
eggie (2026-03-07 18:23:58+00:00): Dag jd  Ik heb leisure=pitch toegevoegd. Anders geen effect.
MVG
eggie
jdcaycedoc (2026-03-07 18:31:28+00:00): Goed, dankjewel. Als je nog een minuut hebt, in welke zin is zou dat anders geen effect hebben? Dan weet ik het goed.
eggie (2026-03-07 18:36:46+00:00): As a node placed in the centre of the tennis table or group of tables. As a closed way placed on the outside edge of the tennis table or group of tables. Add the tags leisure=pitch + sport=table_tennis. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dtable_tennis

Of het als node rendert even geen idee.
Vaak wordt het ook als vlak getagd. Dan kleig je in ieder geval een rendering als vlak net als basketbalveldjes e.d.
eggie (2026-03-07 18:38:55+00:00): De tags heb ik nu op het vlak gezet waar ik de tafeltennistafel zie. 

Dat is een pietsje noordelijker.
eggie (2026-03-07 18:41:54+00:00): Tafel rendert nu wel als pitch.
CTRL-F5 op een PC.. cache leegmaken.
jdcaycedoc (2026-03-07 18:42:27+00:00): Dat klinkt goed, dankjewel voor de aanpassingen. Volgende keer doe it het graag zelf nauwkeuriger.
Avery Sian (2026-03-07 18:17:28+00:00): Ignore what I wrote in the changeset description. Changes were only made in the FEU Diliman Campus.
Jrachi (2026-03-08 06:29:51+00:00): Ciao.
Dovresti impegnarti un pelo di più nel commento. "perfezionamento mappa" va bene una volta per piccoli cambiamenti, ma ogni volta non è ammissibile!
Jrachi (2026-03-08 06:33:01+00:00): Hai modificato l'ordine dei membri della relazione del percorso a catasto nazionale EATN4070.
Si tratta di un errore che potresti evitare anche se iD non è l'ideale per modificare le relazioni.

Ivo
NeisBot (2026-03-07 18:12:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/1486348010 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Estate home sites"

#MapWithoutSpam
Harvest Companies (2026-03-07 18:16:49+00:00): One-Acre Estate Home Sites
JakovRajić (2026-03-10 11:34:23+00:00): Forgot to remove hgv:no tag; done in changeset/179633742
eggie (2026-03-07 18:25:57+00:00): Dag Bram,

Probeer je editgebied klein te houden. Dus niet schuiven met de kaart in editmodus. Dat levert met editor iD vaak schade op door onbedoelde verplaatsingen.

MVG
eggie
JakovRajić (2026-03-10 11:42:55+00:00): Missed a segment; tagged in changeset/179634251
Norbert Dichter (2026-03-07 20:03:28+00:00): it is working now?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179504669
Adrian Shobrooke (2026-03-07 21:43:25+00:00): I've able to log on to TM on pc,  but not phone.
KennyDap (2026-03-08 02:51:33+00:00): Yes, that's bad. The default language should be the one used in the region. If you're just learning mapping, start with small objects, not large entities.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179516863
ugjitrhhrurti (2026-04-05 22:38:39+00:00): Can I do it again? If not, why?
LingM (2026-04-04 16:29:34+00:00): Hallo Vanox,

die Treppe am Edeka-Parkplatz sieht mir etwas verdächtig aus. An der Treppe selbst ist eine Kinderwagenrampe getaggt, aber direkt daneben ist auch ein Fußweg eingetragen.

Gibt es diesen Fußweg wirklich oder sollte hier besser eine Rollstuhlrampe eingetragen werden? Weißt du das noch bzw. kommst du nochmal dort vorbei?

Ein Foto wäre wie immer ideal.

~LingM
one_electro_dan (2026-03-10 14:30:18+00:00): Salut! Care este sursa pentru limita de 30 km/h pe care ai adăugat-o pe living_streets?
rarad74 (2026-03-10 16:10:44+00:00): Salut. Da, ai dreptate, ca am zic ca sunt fara limite din moment ce sunt proprietati private. Am ramas cu obisnuinta limitelor de viteza pe living streets in Bucuresti in zonele de 30 la ora si alte orase mari.