piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ElliottPlack (2023-11-17 15:48:41+00:00): hi there, elliott here from the DWG. Would you happen to know if this track specifically allows or forbids bikes to access it?
ElliottPlack (2023-11-17 15:48:45+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/92938534
gerhard81 (2023-11-17 16:07:55+00:00): Hi!
Unfortunately, there is no official MTB route here. The routes that have been opened for public are all already recorded in relations.

Basically, Austrian law states that cycling on forest roads is generally prohibited - unless there are special agreements with the landowner(s). In the Almtal, hell will probably freeze over before paths are opened here.
StC (2024-01-17 21:25:32+00:00): Bonjour,

je ne suis pas sûr de comprendre cette modification, qui semble combiner deux liaisons différentes du réseau.

Est-ce que l'intention était de créer une nouvelle liaison ?

St.
MAUREL Christophe (2024-01-22 07:28:57+00:00): Bonjour
Le chemin du coucou correspond au nouvel itinéraire officiel permettant de relier la route de Bergin vers le nord.  (Circuit des "lacs et marais de Chevelu"). L'itinéraire plus à l'ouest a été supprimé (demande des propriétaires). Le Chemin du coucou a été balisé début novembre.
Pas sûr que ce soit clair!?
Cordialement
map per (2023-11-03 16:19:59+00:00): Hello,

And welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Concerning review_requested:
In this edit you accidentally changed the building shape and dragged an address node in Austria around (see: https://osmlab.github.io/changeset-map/#143563917). I fixed that.

Best regards and happy mapping
map per
eggie (2023-11-03 10:03:48+00:00): Dag ijzzie..
Het lijkt me ook een erf. 
..access=no hoort eigenlijk access=private te zijn.
De eigenaar hoort ook dmv een bord art 461 wvs duidelijk te maken dat er geen toegang is.
Mvg
eggie
ijzzie (2023-11-03 18:44:15+00:00): Er staan bordjes met Eigen Terrein. Ik ben later even teruggegaan om te checken. Ik had ze eerste keer gemist. Je kunt de verbinding Oude Telgterweg naar de Telgter Buurtweg niet maken. Halverwege staat er ook een hek.
eggie (2023-11-03 19:01:46+00:00): Oke   

Ik heb access=no net aangepast naar =private.. Dat is de geëigende tag voor zo'n wegdeel.

Bedankt voor de moeite en je reactie.
MVG
eggie
synfarer (2024-02-11 12:36:25+00:00): Hei Totto. Ser du har lagt til access=no på Fjelltunvegen. Dette er nok alt for strengt, da det forbyr all trafikk og man må legge til unntak for de som evt har lov. I dette tilfellet er det skiltet forbudt for motorkjøretøy med "gjelder gjennomkjøring", da er motor_vehicle=destination nok til å formidle dette, og det er mye enklere enn å forby alt og så legge til unntak for alt utenom biltrafikk.

Ta gjerne en kikk på wiki siden for access tagen hvis du lurer på noe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
Totto_Taxi (2024-02-12 14:42:57+00:00): Jeg er en smule fersk på dette, og utfordringen vi hadde var at ruteplanlegging for taxitur planla ruten gjennom disse veiene, men følgelig feil drosjepris.
Jeg og en mer erfaren arbeidskontakt prøvde forskjellige ting, og dette virket etter hensikten, og ser ut til å gjøre det enda....
Det blir ikke mange slike løsninger, men siden mange turer med turister går potensielt gjennom her ved feil planlegging, vil jeg helst ikke endre i dette tilfellet.. 
Jeg husker ikke om dette ble satt opp slik av oss eller om dette er blitt endret etterpå? ..av deg?...
synfarer (2024-02-13 21:57:58+00:00): Et grunnprinsipp i openstreetmap er at man skal kartlegge verden slik den faktisk er, og ikke bruke lure triks for å få ting til å se ut en viss måte på et kart eller få en ruteplanlegger til å oppføre seg på en viss måte. Her er den faktiske skiltingen gjennomkjøring forbudt for motorvogn, og da er riktig representasjon i OSM motor_vehicle=destination. Hvis ruteplanleggeren deres ikke forstår dette riktig er det produsenten av den dere må klage til, å ikke endre kartet for å trikse det til. 

Når det er sagt så ser det ikke ut som det har blitt prøvd med kun motor_vehicle=destination på denne vegen, så jeg vil tippe det kommer til å fungere. Jeg ser brukeren RobertZ har gjort dette på noen andre veier i området (kanskje dette er arbeidskontakten din?).

Jeg har ikke endret noe før nå, men nå går jeg inn og forenkler tagging slik jeg har forklart over. Så får du heller si fra hvis det skaper trøbbel igjen.
synfarer (2024-02-13 22:06:24+00:00): Ellers så vil jeg bare si at det er veldig flott at du ønsker å bidra til OSM! Som taxisjåfør får du jo med deg veldig mye, og her har du jo funnet en faktisk mangel i kartet. Jeg håper jeg ikke framstår som for kranglete, og at jeg bare ønsker hjelpe til med å gjøre taggingen så riktig som mulig =)

Hvis du vil bidra mer til kartet så legger jeg ved en link til wikien for Norge. Under "Norwegian Roads" tittelen er det blant annet en link til en side som forklarer all veitagging i Norge, med mange eksempler med norske skilt og veistandarder. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/No:Map_Features
HellMap (2023-11-03 15:33:47+00:00): Čau, te vairs nav apgriešanās? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5983911528
UrSuS (2023-11-03 15:38:05+00:00): Čau! Tagad vairs nav tikai pa tiltu :)
HellMap (2023-11-03 15:50:36+00:00): A kas tur tagad ir? Barjeras, zāle, vienkārši zīme?
NorthCrab_upload (2023-11-03 09:20:54+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11309202592

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
MxxCon (2023-11-03 22:56:59+00:00): Hello.
Why are you mapping traffic signals like this? What is this based on?
According to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtraffic_signals they should be mapped either at the intersection node or if you are mapping them on each way, they should be placed at the marked _stopping location_.
Also, why did you delete pedestrian crossing tags?!

Could you please explain your mapping?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143564524
deepikja (2023-11-10 19:35:10+00:00): Hi,
Thank you for reviewing the edit and notifying us about the improper modifications. These changes were done by the editors in accordance with our internal SOP. We apologize for the incorrect edits flown into OSM from our end. I have investigated the edits and made the appropriate changes in the changeset ID # 143876984.
We will re-examine all of the changesets in which the team has updated traffic signal/stop sign attributes, and rectify them by 11/16. We will also work on updating the SOP to be followed while adding these attributes on public OSM which align with the community guidelines/OSM wiki.
Regards,
Deepika
DavidKarlas (2023-11-03 12:49:20+00:00): Hi,

could you please pay attention on direction of coastline, because currently most of islands you added in this changeset are point inward, hence they will be rendered as water and not insland.

Thank you,
David
damianeue (2023-11-03 09:25:18+00:00): *WORK FINISHED, probably now I'll start fixing SS259 geometry
mp747474 (2023-11-03 09:51:51+00:00): revertiert in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143566074
zstadler (2023-11-04 08:33:36+00:00): שלום Flayer,

תודה רבה על העידכונים למפה

כפי שפורסם, המפה של ישראל עברה מתקפה זדונית מקיפה. השיחזור שלה עדיין לא הסתיים

יש לקחת בחשבון בחשבון שבמהלך השיחזור עלולות להמחק גם עריכות לגיטימיות

ניתן לעקוב אחרי התקדמות השיחזור בשירשור
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/vandalism-and-blocks-in-israel/105176

Hello Flayer,

Thank you for updating the map.

As you probably know, the OSM map in Israel was subject to a severe vandalism attack. The recovery from the attack is still on going.

Note that some legitimate edits made during the recovery period may be removed in the process.

See
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/vandalism-and-blocks-in-israel/105176
for the latest updates on the recovery progress
zorglubu (2023-11-04 18:23:42+00:00): Bonjour,

Votre groupe de modification couvre un territoire allant d'Hendaye à Genève.
Je surveille actuellement ce qui se passe en Creuse, couverte par votre zone de modification, ce qui m'envoie une alerte, mais il est très difficile de vérifier ce qui a été fait du fait de la superficie couverte.

Je ne doute pas de la qualité des contributions vu mes quelques vérifications, mais ce serait vraiment sympa de regrouper les modifications par zones plus petites. Merci beaucoup :-)
ravenfeld (2023-11-04 18:55:56+00:00): Pas de souci, j'avais pas le net et je pensais pas que cela allait faire une zone comme cela. Pour information on m'a envoyé environ 500 gpx de descente de VTT et je regarde si les chemins sont au moins dans OSM. Et j'en profite aussi pour rajouter certain lorsqu'ils sont juste a coté via la carte de chaleur Strava. Je vais essayer d'envoyer a chaque modification maintenant que j'ai récupéré le net.
bxl-forever (2023-11-03 11:08:44+00:00): Hello,

A school within a school?
6 objects with the same name?
The school perimeter with a building tag as it if was a giant building overlapping all the existing buildings: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1220468345

Are you sure you know what you are doing?

We are inclined to erase your latest changes.  I spent 20 minutes cleaning up the mess you did for a school in Forest but this one is probably even worse.

Please learn a bit about how OSM works, there are plenty of tutorials around, we have a lot of documentation on our wiki, or simply look at how the school on the same street is mapped: one single area, they do not repeat the school name on every possible building, no need to force postcodes on every building…
Nicolas1480 (2023-11-03 12:38:22+00:00): Hello,

1. You are not the boss of anyone despite what you may think.
2. Don't address to people you don't know in a rude manner.
3. If you want to update places you don't know about, please do.
4. This is the last you'll hear from me.
deepok14 (2023-11-03 09:46:36+00:00): #swissredcross #novartis23
lefuturiste (2023-11-03 15:44:59+00:00): warnings JOSM ou via osmose ?
Yherisson (2023-11-03 15:55:59+00:00): La c’était JOSM, il y avait des rues sans nom, des chemins non joints à d'autre, des trucs assez basiques
NorthCrab_upload (2023-11-03 10:11:53+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/338343657

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Ti_Ru (2023-11-13 09:48:48+00:00): Hi madba008. I am regular user of this road and the construction is completed long back. Why are you changing a functioning road to Under Construction tag. Swiggy guys are repeatedly doing this and using terms like evidences and ground truth. ither your satellige imagery must be extremely outdated or the GPS traces of your employees must be extremely outdated. Please check the veracity of data before thinking it as Ground Truth or Evidences.
MxxCon (2023-11-03 22:57:33+00:00): Hello.
Why are you mapping traffic signals like this? What is this based on?
According to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtraffic_signals they should be mapped either at the intersection node or if you are mapping them on each way, they should be placed at the marked _stopping location_.
Could you please explain your mapping?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143566597
deepikja (2023-11-10 18:45:59+00:00): Hi,
Thank you for reviewing the edit and notifying us about the improper modifications. These changes were done by the editors in accordance with our internal SOP. We apologize for the incorrect edits flown into OSM from our end. I have investigated the edits and made the appropriate changes in the changeset ID #143875130.  
We will re-examine all of the changesets in which the team has updated traffic signal/stop sign attributes, and rectify them by 11/16. We will also work on updating the SOP to be followed while adding these attributes on public OSM which align with the community guidelines/OSM wiki. 
Regards,
Deepika
NorthCrab_upload (2023-11-03 10:11:52+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11309274225

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
user_5359 (2023-11-04 06:55:25+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I remove your SEO SPAM entry (mostly foreign keys). Please have a look on https://wiki.osm.org!
arjunaraoc (2023-12-07 12:19:32+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia)
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143567051
Frans S (2023-11-20 13:07:21+00:00): Hello Barbara,
Thanks for mapping on this project.
Please tag the highways in accordance to this wiki
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa
and,  try to connect highways to each other to achieve a network of paths/roads,
Here, most traces inside a residential area can be tagged as path (narrow) or residential/unclassified.
Best regards and keep mapping
rhtb0 (2023-11-03 10:20:47+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ko:%EC%9D%B4%EB%A6%84
TelsiuurajonoosvaivlTtllti24ii2 (2023-11-03 10:19:16+00:00): reverted some nonsense edits, sorry for taking up almost the entirety of the world
rskedgell (2023-11-04 05:30:57+00:00): You appear to have tagged two section of the A650 as foot=no in response to a StreetComplete task asking "Are pedestrians forbidden to walk on this road here?"

I'm trying to find any evidence in Bing Streetside imagery that there really is a (signed) pedestrian prohibition here. I cannot see any TSRGD diagram 625.1 "pedestrians prohibited" signs on the imagery, so do not believe that a prohibition exists. Is this a new signed restriction created by a traffic order more recent than the Bing streetside imagery?

The wiki states that access tags reflect legal access. Subjective opinions about whether it would be pleasant, a good idea, safe, etc. for a particular transport mode are not relevant to legal access.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:foot

As real pedestrian prohibitions on public roads other than those tagged as highway=motorway or motorroad=yes in the UK are quite rare and are always signed, this quest is probably better left disabled.
rskedgell (2023-11-15 08:40:34+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144040774
jeis_BKG (2023-11-03 13:29:18+00:00): Hi TiNiP_bkg,
bitte die Telefonnummer in der OSM-Schreibweise erfassen: +49 5439 9417 11
Danke für's Mappen,
jeis_BKG
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143567843
jeis_BKG (2023-11-03 13:38:16+00:00): Ergänzend dazu bitte keine Attribute doppelt erfassen: amenity=school ist bereits für das Schulgelände erfasst und sollte aus dem Gebäudetagging wieder rausgenommen werden.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-11-03 10:40:32+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, zamień addr:place na addr:city. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/507256453

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
nevw (2023-11-03 11:12:26+00:00): Hi, we don’t use abbreviations in street names in osm … for example, St should be entered as Street
map per (2023-11-03 21:25:11+00:00): Can you please stop adding nonsense tourist appartments. The translation strings in Maps.me are wrong. You are adding a "Tourist Appartment", not an "Appartment".
citrula (2023-11-03 20:05:42+00:00): yes, this looks better. Thanks for the fix!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143568130
AngryKoconut (2023-11-03 21:43:01+00:00): Anyone at any time let me know if I’m doing anything dumb or should do something different
eggie (2023-11-03 10:55:27+00:00): Dag Faabvk
Je vraagt feedback.. Lijkt me oke zo..
MVG
eggie
whb (2023-12-13 21:47:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145090606 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by Vollprecht. Reason: Unsuccessful attempt to enter a hiking route, resulting in duplicated ways and incorrect deletions. See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/106948
eggie (2023-11-03 11:29:33+00:00): Dag Johan,

Je vraagt feedback  Je zou het Lupien kunnen vragen (edit 2015) waarom hij dat stuk op disused:highway heeft gezet. 
Het was e.o.a fietsparcours.. Je het nog wel disused:sport tags laten staan.   Kan nu wellicht weg. 
en disused:surface=asphalt? 
Dat laatste kan beter aangepast worden naar wat er werkelijk ligt. 

Maar als je er kan lopen en de route staat zo aangegeven lijkt het me oke. 

MVG
eggie
citrula (2023-11-14 16:34:02+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have corrected some of the tags on your business to conform with OSM standards. Feel free to ask me any questions you may have!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143568667
chris66 (2024-05-17 16:59:44+00:00): Betr:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4280848
Auf mapillary sind in dieser Straße jede Menge Autos zu sehen, so dass IMHO motor_vehice=yes fehlt.
Langlaeufer (2024-05-17 17:51:04+00:00): korrekt, das fehlte.
wermak (2023-11-11 00:02:12+00:00): Hallo thonies,
woher hast du die Information, die Baustelle in diesem Bereich sei abgeschlossen? Hier wird momentan z.B. immer noch am Überbau einer Brücke gearbeitet.

Schöne Grüße
silversurfer83 (2023-11-03 11:51:51+00:00): Gude :)

danke für's Anlegen. Alleine schafft man ja nicht alles ;)

Frage zur Erörterung: Ich halte "shed" hier nicht für das geeignete Tag, da die Fahrräder ja ganz klar an klassischen Bügeln (stands) abgestellt werden. Diese sind überdacht. Sieht man auf diesem Bild https://kartaview.org/details/4571897/561 ganz gut.
Wenn ich auf der Karte "shed" lese, dann gehe ich von einem abschließbaren Unterstand aus.
Ggf. einfach den Unterstand als eigenes Objekt noch über den Node der Fahrradbügel, oder?

Grüße
silversurfer83

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:bicycle_parking
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143569037
nvv_jak (2023-11-03 12:39:40+00:00): Moin,
ich habs korrigiert. Unterstand trage ich die Tage nach.
Viele Grüße
nvv_jak
MarcoR (2023-11-04 07:48:51+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto su OpenStreetMap!

Hai aggiunto alcuni metodi di pagamento ma hai tolto i tag del nome e del tipo di negozio? 

Si chiama sempre "Gelateria La Meringa"?

Buon mapping,
Marco.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-11-03 11:10:28+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11309342835

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
zstadler (2023-11-03 15:02:45+00:00): שלום סיוון,

תודה רבה על העידכונים שאתה מעלה למפה

כפי שכנראה אתה יודע, המפה של ישראל עברה מתקפה זדונית והשיחזור שלה עדיין לא הסתיים

קח בחשבון שבמהלך השיחזור עלולות להמחק גם עריכות לגיטימיות

ראה את השירשור
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/vandalism-and-blocks-in-israel/105176  
למעקב אחרי התקדמות השיחזור

Hello Sivan, 

Thank you for updating the map.

As you probably know, the OSM map in Israel was subject to a vandalism attack. The recovery from. the attack is still on going.

Note that some legitimate edits made during the recovery period will be removed in the process.

See
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/vandalism-and-blocks-in-israel/105176
for the latest updates on the recovery
bxl-forever (2024-02-04 18:10:36+00:00): Hello,

Deliberately adding incorrect data in OSM for the sake of pleasing buggy renderers is disallowed.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1209725304

We must tag reality, not "tag for the renderer".
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer

If there is a problem because one of the (many) third-party apps that generates 3D views of buildings, it should be reported to the devs of that software.  Please undo your changes.
Sylle_99 (2024-02-05 07:52:41+00:00): Hi bxl-forever,
Thank you for drawing my attention to that particular wiki entry.
I removed the height tag as you asked.

However after seeing the examples in the wiki entry, I must respectfully disagree that my entry was skewing the OSM data. The outline itself has no further value than containing the footprint of that particular building as I spent a considerable amount of time  faithfully recreating the whole building using multiple parts, all with their correct number of levels.

My goal, just like yours (although my contribution is at a much, much lower level than you), is to have the most accurate and complete OSM data.

Best regards,
S.
Colin Smale (2023-11-03 12:04:48+00:00): Hi! Can you tell us what your source is for the admin boundary (LWM) and coastline (HWM) data? It doesn't seem to correspond to OS data and the combination has anomalies (coastline beyond admin boundary for example)
TelsiuurajonoosvaivlTtllti24ii2 (2023-11-03 13:44:28+00:00): sorry mate, i didnt notice your comment

In the newer changesets the coastline is from Bing Aerial Imagery and the admin boundary is from OS Maps
Colin Smale (2023-11-03 17:56:41+00:00): It's really not a good idea to infer coastlines from aerial imagery. The coastline is defined as mean high water springs, which is taken as a long-term average and no snapshot can be good enough, even if you could detect where the water stops and the state of the tide at the instant the photo was taken. There was a recent discussion on this subject on the Talk-GB mailing list: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2023-October/030770.html

When you say "OS Maps" do you mean the published vector data in (e.g.) Boundary-Line, of something else? As admin boundaries are aligned to Mean Low Water Springs (in Scotland) the same comment about aerial photos applies here as well.
TelsiuurajonoosvaivlTtllti24ii2 (2023-11-03 19:37:39+00:00): by OS maps i meant this imagery layer in iD: "OS OpenData StreetView (April 2016)"
TelsiuurajonoosvaivlTtllti24ii2 (2023-11-03 19:38:36+00:00): However I do not think tracing coastlines from satellite imagery is bad per se. It may be *slightly* outdated, but it is impossible to keep track of a coastline especially with the additional factors
TelsiuurajonoosvaivlTtllti24ii2 (2023-11-03 19:42:39+00:00): I have also talked with Thiskal about this coastline issue too. Reading their changeset comments they seem to have the right:
>The wiki page already states:
"1. Don't assume the OS data is either correct or up to date. Use it as a guide and additional resource for your mapping, not a replacement."
TelsiuurajonoosvaivlTtllti24ii2 (2023-11-03 19:43:03+00:00): I meant they are correct, sorry for the wording.