piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
osmoso (2025-05-24 16:23:37+00:00): Because many map providers include it in their maps and present it as parking space without labelling it as private and users think they can park here. When searching for a parking space this information is completely misleading. Do you want to include every private parking space behind every house in OSM This is a private backyard and sometimes used for parking, sometimes for a local market and sometimes for other purposes.
FroschForscher (2025-05-24 19:58:31+00:00): Thanks for answering

> Because many map providers include it in their maps and present it as parking space without labelling it as private and users think they can park here.

This is NEVER a reason to delete data. Possible solutions for such problems are adding more data (details like access), fixing map providers, teaching users.

> without labelling it as private 

Because there wasn't any `access` added on this parking. So data consumers have to guess access public,private,customerstime-limited,... or use defaults.

> Do you want to include every private parking space behind every house in OSM

There is a difference between adding data and keeping (valid) data. For keeping valid data, that can easily be verified OTG, the answer is always yes. For adding data the answer is yes if it has a reasonable size and can be easily verified OTG.
CurlingMan13 (2025-05-24 04:30:14+00:00): FYI.  A good hotkey for ID is [CTRL]+[DOWN ARROW] when you have a way (power line) selected.  It will then select all the points instead that make up the way.  Then you can tag them as a power pole.  Goes a long ways in adding details.  :)

I am going through your olderC/S in NJ and have been seeing it quite a bit.
donnatokimo (2025-05-24 01:21:48+00:00): my mistake, I meant to say west entrance and the basement. the north entrance is a staircase.
jeslop (2025-05-24 07:38:00+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166683805
jeslop (2025-05-24 07:38:01+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166683805
jmapb (2026-06-07 14:01:29+00:00): Partially reverted in https://osm.org/changeset/183746600 -- this changeset added invalid construction based on outdated imagery. In particular, https://osm.org/way/1389210257 was added where Bing aerial shows construction beginning for a new bridge over the Esopus. The bridge was finished and mapped years ago, but it was incorrectly realigned in https://osm.org/changeset/165022889 shortly before this changeset, which obviously led to some confusion here.

When mapping without local knowledge, please pay attention to how the date of the aerial imagery compares to the date of recent edits. Bing is pretty old around here. Feel free to leave a map note or contact a local mapper in cases of ambiguity.

Thanks, jmapb
NeisBot (2025-05-24 02:34:06+00:00): Hi Nkhk_KMG, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: ""

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment #AIgenerated #NoComment
NeisReview (2025-05-24 07:36:13+00:00): A draft for your comment could be: "Updated names and added Chinese translations for several road links."
Joseph R P (2025-05-26 20:26:08+00:00): Do you have an explanation for why this is correct aside from a supposed firsthand survey, particularly why a small side street should be tagged as primary and a small stretch of Route 114 should be tagged the same as Route 24?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-26 21:34:37+00:00): given you asked already days ago in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164612039 - it should be fine to simply revert this edit by now
StreetSurveyor (2025-05-26 21:46:59+00:00): These are links to the highway sections. That’s why I tagged them as such.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-26 22:13:41+00:00): what about https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/19347806/history ?
StreetSurveyor (2025-05-26 22:18:35+00:00): I had that section as primary to match the section it connects to.
Joseph R P (2025-05-26 23:22:54+00:00): This road isn't a link though, it's a small frontage road providing access to a few houses. Cars are not using it by getting off Route 114 and then re-entering it. Side streets also are not classified based off the main roads they spur off of, because by that logic, Corys Lane should be trunk, Freeborn Street should be primary, etc., but they are residential streets.

The short section of Route 114 you tagged as a motorway is not a link either, it simply splits at the terminus of an actual motorway, which is Route 24. Cars driving down 114 are not briefly entering a quarter-mile long freeway, then exiting off onto a different road because both the primary and trunk sections are part of the same highway.
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-06-02 02:28:38+00:00): I've never been to Rhode Island, but the unnamed residential road is not a freeway exit, the quintessential example of a motorway link. It provides direct access to a few houses, which is not something that an on/off ramp would do.
MassCartog (2025-06-11 14:00:55+00:00): Hello welcome to OSM. In this change set you have removed valid ways leading into parking lots. Was this a mistake?
user_5359 (2025-05-24 08:58:33+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please add useful comments!
dzamper (2025-05-28 08:11:27+00:00): Lokal był już dodany wcześniej:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12846625167
Vinber-Pro (2025-05-27 07:48:01+00:00): bonjour,

tu as ajouté ici un parking à vélo, qui semble être un doublon d'un parking à vélo déja présent https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12744618566

ou est-ce qu'il y a 2 équipements différents ?

bonne carto
Noxounet (2025-05-27 17:34:06+00:00): Coucou ! Alors, bête comme je suis je saurai même pas te répondre assurément ! C'est vrai que vu comme ca ca a bien l'air d'un doublon, argh. Mais je ne me souviens pas avoir vu le parking velo sur la carte qd je la consultais...

Je vérife ca sur place qd je peux et je te dis !  ^^'

Merci pour le message !
Vinber-Pro (2025-06-04 09:48:01+00:00): merci de ton retour,
et non tu n'es pas bête, on oublie, on fait sans se rendre compte parfois :)

rien de pressé hein :)
gscholz (2025-05-26 15:13:20+00:00): Hi obi76,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways( blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=1.10737&lat=49.44874&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=166681424

As you may know, this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps. Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
obi76 (2025-05-26 15:46:13+00:00): Hi !
yes, it's what I supposed... So cancel my modifications, I don't know how properly make this change... :-/
Regards,
rskedgell (2025-05-24 06:21:59+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I can see from your website that you operate from 84 Strathville Road, but what your edit has inadvertently done is to remove the building from the map.

If your company premises occupy the whole building, then you might want to add something like office=company and/or an appropriate value of craft=*, together with tags for contact details and website. This lets data consumers know what sort of map feature you are, as they won't see your website address in the changeset comment.

If the business occupies only part of the building, it might be better to map it as a separate node (point).

I've added links to the documentation for the tags below, but if you'd like any help please reply below.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aoffice%3Dcompany
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:craft
maximusradikus (2025-05-24 05:39:15+00:00): Hello, This is my first change! Please tell me if there is anything that needs correction.
jmarchon (2025-05-25 02:47:13+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Looks all good to me.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166681483
user_5359 (2025-05-24 08:51:51+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please move the adress to a building! And a name isn't a address.
Garcia443 (2025-05-25 15:03:21+00:00): It is a building and an address.  Are you blind?
NeisBot (2025-05-24 05:45:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-05-29 09:25:01+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/166910586
eggie (2025-05-24 06:48:22+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback   Beter geen adresnodes aanpassen. Die zijn import vanuit het Kadaster.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-05-20 10:22:50+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12860188601/history has addr:housename = 167 that was added in this edit
What this tag means? Numeric value is unexpected here - was it supposed to be addr:housenumber= ?
Nemo_bis (2026-05-20 16:26:35+00:00): I don't remember, probably yes itshould be addr:housenumber. Thanks!
rhhs (2025-05-24 07:48:53+00:00): Maybe we should specify that the node "Министрество на финансите" is not THE ministry, but a small department of it?
Dimitar155 (2025-05-24 08:05:43+00:00): It was used by "АДФИ" some time ago. Currently it is not publicly listed on minfin.bg (google "site:minfin.bg будапеща 17"). It exists in some old procurement documents but that's about it.
rhhs (2025-05-24 08:12:58+00:00): Maybe better to remove it (or add disused:)? We don't want people looking for the ministry to go to that address...
Dimitar155 (2025-05-24 08:15:57+00:00): diused: seems fine. After all, the office is still there and some institution might use it someday. Updated accordingly.
donnatokimo (2025-05-24 06:52:46+00:00): I'm not sure how to tag the level of the businesses when I get around to doing that. After reading the wiki, it looks like I should tag the businesses accessible on the lower lot with `level=0` and start the businesses accessible on the upper lot at `level=1`, is that correct?
eggie (2025-05-24 08:23:09+00:00): Oke Donux,
Maar dan achter het hek kun je na splitsen ook access=private toevoegen. 
gr eggie
Hufkratzer (2025-05-24 20:07:04+00:00): Hi,
leisure=horse_riding + natural=sand is not the recommended tagging for a riding arena like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1321924155. It should be tagged with leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian + surface=sand instead. 
leisure=horse_riding  should be used for the whole riding centre,
see
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a#Riding_centre_(equestrian)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/932566381#map=18/38.743241/-9.192668&layers=P (example)
Hufkratzer (2025-05-24 20:09:05+00:00): In JOSM for the riding arena you can use the preset for equestrian sport.
Reino Baptista (2025-05-25 07:25:58+00:00): Hello,

Thank you. I've already made the alterations you mentioned.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166722133#map=17/38.822265/-9.219589

RB
Hufkratzer (2025-05-25 11:50:30+00:00): Obrigado
silimotion (2025-09-07 12:19:14+00:00): Dear Jean-Pierre,

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think you used this website or similar as source for this changeset: [https://renovables.totalenergies.es/proyectos/energia-solar/guillena](https://renovables.totalenergies.es/proyectos/energia-solar/guillena).

However, as explained in that same page, the 263 MW "cluster" is made up of 5 different solar plants, none of which are this one. In my previous changeset where I added the original value of 110.4 MW, I also provided a source which shows this is the correct value.

The start_date would therefore also be incorrect.

If you think I am not correct or I am missing some information, please answer so we can find the best solution.

I will update the solar plant in a few days if I receive no response.

Thanks again for helping out the project! Just be more careful - data quality is of the utmost importance.

Kind regards,
silimotion
Jean-Pierre Rondeau (2025-09-07 13:45:47+00:00): Bonjour Silimotion,
Vos sources sembles plus fiables que les miennes. je vous laisse le soin de rétablir vos valeurs.
Respectueusement.
StC (2025-06-27 15:56:33+00:00): Bonjour,

j'ai l'impression que ce changeset a créé des trous dans l'itinéraire pédestre qui passe par là. Je m'occupe de les boucher.
Penegal (2025-06-28 05:45:00+00:00): Bonjour.

Ah ? Bizarre, j’avais pourtant téléchargé également les relations, justement pour éviter ça… Merci pour la correction, en tout cas !
jeslop (2025-05-24 07:28:43+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166683582
user_5359 (2025-05-24 08:48:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM! How could the residents leave the street?
Brian McCollough (2025-05-24 13:30:49+00:00): It’s a two-way street but I’d only wide enough for 1 vehicle. If you meet someone going the opposite way, one of you must pull over while the other passes.
user_5359 (2025-05-24 13:43:12+00:00): Please see the difference between oneway (https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:oneway) and lanes (https://wiki.osn.org/wiki/Key:lanes#Examples) . I will change it to lanes=1.
Brian McCollough (2025-05-24 18:10:49+00:00): Very good. Thank you.
jeslop (2025-05-24 07:28:44+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166683582
eggie (2025-05-24 08:02:37+00:00): Dag vakantieland.. Dit is wat je hebt gedaan.
Je hebt tal van wegen en kruispunten verschoven.
Oorzaak.. schuiven met de kaart in editmodus...   Je selecteert dan onbewust een weg of node en gaat de kaart verschuive. Dan verschuif je niet de kaart maar de weg of node met alles wat er aan vastzit. Resultaat.. schade aan de kart.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=166683200
MVG
eggie
vakantieland dot nl (2025-05-24 08:10:11+00:00): Sorry, ik was vandaag al zo blij dat ik eindelijk uitgevonden heb hoe ik de grenzen en landuse uit kan zetten. Ik wil vooral de effenheid van wegen aanpassen naar wel/niet skeeler geschikt, het oppervlakte materiaal van de weg, verkeersremmers, en voorrang (highway=give_way) toevoegen.
eggie (2025-05-24 08:11:12+00:00): Ik heb nu de schade hersteld ...  maar een revert was handiger geweest.
eggie (2025-05-24 08:14:42+00:00): Ahh... zo...

Nou dat doe ik expres niet, want dan is de kans op schade groter.
 Ik filter dus niet, maar roei met de riemen die er zijn. Je 'moet'overzicht houden...  Ook wat buiten beeld is.
Zet je changeset nummer in achavi.. dan kun je zelf het resultaat controlreen en zie je direct dat iets fout is.
Schakjel over naar editor JOSM.
Veel minder kans op fouten, want selecteren doe je met de linkermuisknop en schuiven met de kaart met de rechter.
Het lijkt dan even opnieuw ebeginnen, maar echt.. het went zo.

editor josm stap voor stap
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/editor-josm-stap-voor-stap/75047

MVG
eggie
vakantieland dot nl (2025-05-24 08:20:39+00:00): Dank voor het herstel. Ik ga beter letten op onbedoeld verplaatsen. JOSM is super onhandig op een Mac, zelfs met de touchscreenhelper plugin is verplaatsen door de kaart met het toetsenbord onmogelijk. De "T" toets schakelt bij mij niet over naar "blader door de kaart met de linkermuisknop".
eggie (2025-05-24 08:27:48+00:00): Ik heb een willekeurige changeset van achavi bij m'n favorieten staan. Die open ik dan vul het changesetnummer in en toets enter.
Dan zie je direct wat je hebt gedaan. 
Ook kun je het beste het gebied van je changeset beperken.. eerder opslaan. Uit de editmodus en dan pas schuiven naar de volgende locatie. 
Iedereen maakt altijd onbewust een keer een fout en de controle helpt dan weer om het weer recht te zetten.
vakantieland dot nl (2025-05-24 08:36:23+00:00): Eerder opslaan is een goede tip. Ik zie zojuist ook dat ik voor het uploaden de lijst van objecten die aangepast gaan worden stuk voor stuk aan kan klikken en dan kan tonen op de kaart. Dank. Er is nog veel werk aan alleen al de verbeteringen van "effenheid"-tags, drempels en voorrang (t.b.v. betere velomobiel routes).
eggie (2025-05-24 09:00:22+00:00): Yeppp...ga door met het nuttige werk!
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-09 13:12:55+00:00): Hello!

You used
smoothness=excellent-
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/392038715/history

Have you maybe meant
smoothness=excellent
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
vakantieland dot nl (2025-12-09 13:20:41+00:00): Yes, I do mean excellent not "excellent-".
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-09 13:37:06+00:00): edited it then
jesselawtonnz (2025-05-26 09:32:07+00:00): Hi, openstreetmap is **NOT** allowed edits from google maps as it breachs copyright, please remove these edits.
jeslop (2025-05-24 07:28:45+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166683582
NeisBot (2025-05-24 07:25:05+00:00): Hi Nemistratos, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Updated place names and Wikipedia links for Cretas/Queretes to improve multilingual support and external references."

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment #AIgenerated #Gibberish
eggie (2025-05-24 07:56:48+00:00): Dag Robin,
foot=no op een fietspad is niet correct in Nederland.
Ik heb er voor nu even foot=use_sidepath van gemaakt.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-05-24 07:59:26+00:00): Je edits...
Dit is geen carlane.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=166683668



Op de hoofdrijbaan staat al foot=use_sidepath
eggie (2025-05-24 08:18:01+00:00): En hier 'moest je schuiven met de kaart en ging het 'toevallig' weer goed. 
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=166683813
Maar met iD weet je het nooit, want je ziet niet wat er gebeurd is.
Dus checken.
HirschKauz (2025-05-24 07:43:36+00:00): source: !rtl but tageblatt.lu :-)
eggie (2025-05-24 08:15:30+00:00): Hier zie je direct dat het goed is gegaan.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=166684130
dieterdreist (2025-07-16 15:55:34+00:00): Ti chiederei di essere più chiaro nei commenti, sopratutto perché hai fatto cosa. Qui vedo che hai segnato la metromare come servizio sospeso, ma non si capisce dal commento. È così attualmente?
gigi2037 (2025-07-16 19:11:56+00:00): se guardi lo storico di metro mare era già stata messa come non utilizzata da chi ha fatto la relazione non da me che non sono di roma per cui non posso sapere che non e utilizzata
dieterdreist (2025-07-16 19:36:42+00:00): Avevo guardato lo storico, hai aggiunto disused=yes nella versione 49, nella 48 non c'era. Io abito vicino e penso che funzioni. Ora tolgo il disused. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1721156/history/49
gigi2037 (2025-07-16 20:27:45+00:00): io lo trovata che era in disuso se  era per me non avrei neanche messa nella relazione
gigi2037 (2025-07-16 20:35:33+00:00): https://www.romatoday.it/politica/stazione-acilia-sud-slitta-apertura-inaugurazione-fine-2024.html
dieterdreist (2025-07-16 21:01:27+00:00): sì, l’articolo si riferisce alla stazione acilia sud, ma io parlo della relazione per il ritorno da Colombo a Porta San Paolo, in versione 48 non aveva disused https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1721156/history/48 e in 49 lo hai aggiunto. Succede, comunque non mi sembra avevi fatto appositamente quindi l’ho tolto, giusto?
gigi2037 (2025-07-17 05:57:46+00:00): ok
monotar (2025-05-24 12:45:15+00:00): ich hätte gerne eine Begründung warum hier wieder großflächig landuses in Coswig gelöscht werden, z.B. rund um die S84 landuse=grass, das kann doch nicht sein! Denkst du ich trag sowas zum Spaß ein? Was soll denn da die Begründung sein, dass dort kein grass ist???
Sandmann4u (2025-05-24 16:34:51+00:00): Ich habe die beanstandeten Flächen lediglich durch kleinteiligere Objekte mit anderen Objekteigenschaften ersetzt. Ich wünsche noch ein schönes Wochenende.
monotar (2025-05-24 21:13:55+00:00): Das hat nichts mit kleinteiligen Flächen zu tun! Ich setze mich hin und füge lückenlosen Landuse ein, du löschst es einfach und produzierst massenweise leere Flächen, löschst die History der Flächen und über die Details brauch ich gar nicht erst anfangen, da ist so viel schlecht gemappt. Das kannst du gerne auf der grünen Wiese machen aber nicht dort wo andere schon mit guter Qualität hingesetzt haben!
Sandmann4u (2025-05-25 08:29:10+00:00): Zuerst einmal können Sie Ihren Ton mäßigen, dann können Sie es noch einmal konstruktiv probieren und dann können Sie mal schauen, was ich auf die Flächen gemappt habe und mir dann erklären, warum das so gravierend von dem abweicht, was Sie da hingezaubert haben.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-05-24 08:20:44+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2757554471
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/866801063

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
SafwatHalaby (2025-05-24 14:46:48+00:00): שלום, ותודה רבה על התרומות ל-OSM! 

נא לשים לב שהשם צריך להיות השם בלבד - אין לשים דברים תיאוריים בשם, כגון "ברז מים", "אתר פיקניק" או "עץ", דברים כאלה מתאימים יותר בצורת תיוג, או בתיאור של האובייקט. 

הוספתם כאן אטרקציה תיורתית שהשם שלה הוא "עץ אולמוס עתיק על גדות הנחל" 

מומלץ לקרוא את שאר ההנחיות לגבי ישראל כאן: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/HE:Israel
aceman444 (2025-06-04 20:39:42+00:00): Zdravim, ake "streetlevel imagery" ste tu pouzili?
EfreetSK (2025-06-09 06:34:23+00:00): Dobrý deň, nespomínam si presne o čom konkrétne to bolo ale bol som tam behať a asi som si nebol istý či som si niektoré veci zapamätal správne tak som si to pre istotu overoval či si to dobre pamätám. Ale bol to určite Google. A keďže mi píšte tak predpokladám že to sa nesmie ...
EfreetSK (2025-06-09 06:50:32+00:00): Áno, už to vidím
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Street-level_imagery_services

Neviem, aký je postup v tomto prípade no ak to pomôže, tak odvtedy som už po týchto cestách a cestičkách bežal asi 4x, tak som si celkom istý tými zmenami. To street imaginery musela byť nejaká drobnosť, myslím že to bola tá závora na konci toho lesa Borinka no odvtedy som bol pri nej už naozaj asi 4x. Skúsim prejsť tie zmeny
EfreetSK (2025-06-09 07:19:27+00:00): Som si takmer istý, že to bola tá závora a celkovo koniec cesty 1389246136. Bežal som totiž menší okruh a otočil som to na cestu 1389246137 a vrátil sa po poli. No už som chcel dokončiť tú 1389246136 aj keď som ju neprebehol celú, lebo to bolo jasné zo satelitných snímkov. A zdalo sa mi že sa to končí závorou, že som ju z cesty videl keď som mal cestu do Štvrtka no nebol som si istý. Tak som chcel byť poctivý a pridal tam že to nebol survey. Ale dobre, do budúcna budem vedieť, úprimne ďakujem za info, ináč by som sa k tejto informácii asi ani nedostal