piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Goffredo (2026-03-18 12:42:40+00:00): Ciao. Duplicare un civico su due ingressi diversi dovrebbe essere un errore in Italia, questo si.
Ma ogni attività commerciale ha un indirizzo, riportato pure sugli eventuali scontrini/fatture, ed è una informazione utile per un database e per l'attività in sè.

Pensando ad una ipotetica query al DB di OSM fatta per indirizzo, verrebbero estratti:
a) il nodo con l'eventuale gate/entrance/solo l'indirizzo, che dovrebbe essere posizionato esattamente dove è l'ingresso fisico (molto utile per i ciechi che la posizione sia esatta). Eviterei inoltre di posizionare questi nodi sugli angoli degli edifici, come il 6a di questo commit. Non si capisce se l'ingresso è a destra o a sinistra dello spigolo.
b) le eventuali attività commerciali, anche molteplici, che hanno quell'indirizzo nella ragione sociale.

Con un secondo filtro, a discrezione dell'uso, si può scegliere tra l'ingresso o una delle attività.

Pensando ad una ipotetica query al DB di OSM fatta per nome dell'attività, verrebbero estratte tutte le attività con quel nome assieme al loro indirizzo, telefono, classificazione, altri tag etc... Molto più utile e completa come informazione
eggie (2026-03-16 09:38:42+00:00): Hoi,
track heb ik aangepast naar pitch
eggie (2026-03-16 09:43:03+00:00): Die noordelijke track klopte ook niet.. Daar heb ik horse_riding van gemaakt over het hele terrein. Wellicht kunnen de namen wel van de bakken af. Beetje overkill.
CTRL-F5 voor het effect
gr eggie
rajdhani (2026-03-18 09:51:10+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:180049515
infeeeee (2026-03-18 14:40:26+00:00): Szia!

note=* címkébe más szerkesztőknek szóló üzeneteket tárolunk, ez az információt szerintem nem kellene itt tárolni, többi címkéből következik, VAGY ha mindenképp el akarod menteni, akkor inkább a description=* címkébe való, azt látják a térkép felhasználói is.

De szerintem erről már beszéltünk, a hasonló jegyzeteiteket már átalakítottam címkékké, az irrelevánsakat meg töröltem, jó lenne, ha nem jönnének vissza.

További jó térképezést!
infeeeee (2026-03-18 14:41:45+00:00): Igen, konkrétan erről a kútról is már letakarítottam egyszer, amikor az összes többiről is Budapesten: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168623930
kapazao (2026-03-16 12:26:03+00:00): Hola, los bares en españa se etiquetan amenity=pub y los pubs amenity=bar, al revés de lo que sugiere la etiqueta.

Puedes comprobarlo en la wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:amenity=bar
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:amenity=pub
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Objetos_que_generan_dudas_en_España

Siempre que sea posible completa su información y proporciona referencias para que pueda verificarse.

Un saludo y gracias por tus contribuciones
NeisBot (2026-03-16 09:48:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13651781396 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Care planning office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-24 11:33:11+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180349156
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:07:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:02:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:11:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
ReyDerayos24 (2026-03-16 17:27:02+00:00): Técnicamente por el nombre Común de la Mancha también puede uno referirse a una comarca de límites idénticos pero con el nombre de Mesa del Quintanar. Es decir, comarca geográfica e histórica que se basa en los límites del antiguo común.
Hugoren Martinako (2026-03-17 09:30:13+00:00): Veo que en ambos casos se trataría igualmente de elementos históricos, sin validez o utilidad actual, por lo que aplicaría de nuevo el criterio de mandarlo a OHM.
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:10:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 08:59:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:12:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
InsertUser (2026-03-16 17:38:52+00:00): Does node  https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13651911792 serve a purpose or was it n a an accident?
Byenin (2026-03-17 04:52:20+00:00): Hi InsertUser, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you.
Byenin (2026-03-18 03:53:01+00:00): Hi InsertUser, thank you for notifying me about this. It was an accident and I have made the corrections now.
t_ja (2026-03-26 16:33:56+00:00): Ahoj,
preco si preznacil tento Z-Box na Alzabox?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13651943401
Ved si v rovnakej sade zmien zaznacil aj Alzabox par metrov juznejsie (hned pri vedlajsej budove)...

T.
Duški Kubov (2026-03-26 19:08:45+00:00): Áno, mášter pravdu, pravdepodobne som sa preklikol pri poslednej úprave. Dám to na poriadok. Ďakujem za upozornenie.
t_ja (2026-03-26 20:47:42+00:00): Vďaka za promptnú opravu.

Akurát pozerám, že môj pôvodný komentár vyššie patrí k sade zmien https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180393188 . Aj u mňa zjavne úraduje nejaký škriatok 🙈
aixbrick (2026-03-16 12:44:01+00:00): Hello,
reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179950060. The northern road is only for leaving the parking lot. There is no direct connection with the southern one. That is clearly visible on NRW Orthophotos.
Regards
Maksim Hradaboyeu (2026-05-22 07:41:12+00:00): Hello aixbrick! Thanks for your feedback and fixing my edit -
it's much appreciated!
Best regards, Maksim
TheSwavu (2026-03-17 07:32:32+00:00): Hi,

Are you sure https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1489413840 exists? The track at the gate goes to the west. At the other end it looks like the car park is accessed by the driveway off Lydia Street.

Thanks.
TheHolyCessna (2026-04-07 07:00:06+00:00): Thanks for bringing this to my attention, I believe I've fixed it now. :)
eggie (2026-03-16 11:14:01+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Dennis Dee (2026-03-16 12:04:24+00:00): Dank voor je tips (ook op de andere commits). Ik zal de tips ter harte nemen bij volgende wijzigingen. 
Dennis
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:01:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:09:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
eggie (2026-03-16 11:24:16+00:00): Dag Dennis,
Probeer bij te taggen op de bestaande adresnode.
Dit adres is volgens mij niet hier.
Dit is de Siciliëboulevard.

MVG
eggie
Frans S (2026-03-16 14:27:28+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please run your validating tool to find issues and solve them before you call a task completely mapped.
Issues from previous mappers might be solved as well. Look also for yards mapped as building.
Best regards and keep mapping
JFL-75 (2026-03-17 18:44:07+00:00): Hi Fran S, thanks for your alert. I always check the validation tool before validating a tile.  Could you indicate the task # you are talking about. I would like to see the reason why something wrong happened. Regards.
Frans S (2026-03-29 08:36:58+00:00): Sorry. It took a while. (overlooked this message)
This is task 489.
btw. you can find it by yourself.
In the description you see the project number. Go to the project and download the taskgrid.
Open this task on the edit tab ,
Both layers should be active.
In JOSM you can select TM taskgrid which shows you the task numbers and status.
Not important, but when you open the datalayer as 2nd it shows up . When you then select the 'project... tasks.geojson layer, you will see the task info.
Best regards
APneunzehn74 (2026-03-16 12:03:08+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:shelter_type vermutlich besser eignen als building=shed und den Namen würde ich ebenfalls weglassen, er wird ja nicht den Eigennamen "Pavillon" tragen.
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:00:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:09:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:02:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:07:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
eggie (2026-03-16 11:20:02+00:00): Oke .. , maar een adres zal dan nog gewoon bestaan. Voortaan beter alleen de bedrijfsinfo verwijderen van een adresnode.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-03-16 11:16:59+00:00): Dag Dennis   De info heb ik samengevoegd met de al bestaande adresnode.
swimming_pool heb ik ook aangepast naar sports_centre.
swimming_pool is een tag voor de bak met water. 

MVG
eggie
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:02:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:06:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
NeisBot (2026-03-16 10:45:41+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 11 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/157117176 v10 | 6 crossings
https://osm.org/way/364632535 v2 | 5 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/3686710228 v4

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179943744
NeisReview (2026-03-24 11:33:14+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/179961077
MappingMore (2026-03-20 04:00:46+00:00): Partially Revert of 179916828
Andrea Musuruane (2026-03-16 14:44:33+00:00): Hi! What's the data source for this path? It is not visible on Esri World Imaginery and I see a different path on the Strava Heat Map.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179944301
vojtechzaboril (2026-03-16 14:49:11+00:00): Hi, we got it in report from our user. It claimed that "There is a new path" and the drawing of the path was also attached. If you found it in Strava.com, it could mean that the drawing was innacurate. Unfortunately Strava doesn't support its WMS layer, which makes it harder to check. If you can, please fix it accordingly to Strava. Otherwise, I will look at it and I will try to fix it.
V
Andrea Musuruane (2026-03-16 15:13:21+00:00): Hi. I amended the path according to Strava.
vojtechzaboril (2026-03-16 15:15:59+00:00): Thank you a lot.
eggie (2026-03-16 13:00:52+00:00): Welcome to osm,

Please have a look here..
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:defibrillator:location?uselang=nl

For the right location use Dutch or English.

Greetz,
eggie
ivanbranco (2026-03-16 11:25:23+00:00): Ciao li_lucarini,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1489418276

questo edificio si chiama davvero "Vita da Pacos"? Vedo inoltre che gli hai segnato 0 piani, come è possibile che un edificio abbia 0 piani?

grazie e buon mapping
ivanbranco (2026-03-16 11:29:01+00:00): Vedo ora che è un bioparco sociale (dal sito che hai allegato all'elemento parco). Penso che non sia *anche* il nome dell'edificio, per cui lo rimuoverei.

grazie ancora per le modifiche
APneunzehn74 (2026-03-16 11:40:20+00:00): Hallo, diesem Weg hier bei 48.807449, 12.899027 hast du von path auf Service geändert. Der passt doch kaum ein PKW durch, ich hätte hier path gelassen. 
Grüße APneunzehn74
Breit S (2026-03-16 11:59:25+00:00): Hallo,
vielen Dank für deinen Hinweis. Ich denke du meinst den seitlichen zum Gebäude C9. Ich prüfe das nochmal und ändere das nochmal. Grund für die Änderung war der aktuelle Lageplan. Anhand deren Zeichnung erkenn ich eine Zufahrtsstraße. Ich war mir auch sicher einen breiten Weg im Kopf zu haben, prüfe es aber gerne nochmal.
VG und besten Dank für den Hinweis.
Samuel
APneunzehn74 (2026-03-16 12:07:12+00:00): Ich meinte das erste Stück Weg hin zur Hausnummer 80 schräg gegenüber der Feuerwehr.
Breit S (2026-03-16 12:15:59+00:00): Oh ja dort hast du Recht, da ist mir ein Fehler passiert. Wurde wieder geändert. Vielen Dank für den Hinweis.
VG.
TuomoSe (2026-03-16 18:35:05+00:00): Miksi muutit parking_aislet drivewayksi?
TuomoSe (2026-03-22 17:25:38+00:00): Koska et vastannut, niin muutin parkkiruutujen välissä kulkevat väylät takaisin parking_aisleiksi.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-01 07:29:15+00:00): Reverted addition of SEO spam name=* tag for online store with no other tags to building

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183482168
007Transformer (2026-03-17 10:33:02+00:00): Reverted in changeset id 179997844
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-07-15 17:26:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 185798781 where the changeset comment is: Reverting fiction added in error by OSMNAXA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20923
iandees (2026-03-16 13:36:58+00:00): Hi, what criteria did you use to change this road's classification?
Shel_Sri (2026-03-17 04:54:57+00:00): Hi iandees, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you.
Shel_Sri (2026-03-18 05:13:04+00:00): Hi iandees,
By visual appearance I reclassified as residential, but I didn’t realize it was inside a parking polygon at that time. I have made the corrections, thank you for pointing this out.
eggie (2026-03-16 11:37:43+00:00): Dag Rican,
Hoe kan zo'n tussenstukje opeens Frankrijkweg heten terwijl de aansluitingen aan beide kanten Bernhardweg heten?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-03-16 11:43:51+00:00): De rest ook aangepast naar Frankrijkweg conform kadaster bgt
https://www.verbeterdekaart.nl/#?geometry.x=40242.46&geometry.y=387436.98&zoomlevel=12.21
Filip009 (2026-04-28 12:17:22+00:00): Zdravím, nebolo by na základe tejto konverzácie https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175218318 vhodnejšie nechať tam access=no a len pridať povolenie od 30. júna?
silversurfer83 (2026-03-16 20:22:51+00:00): Hi :)

schau dir bitte dieses Objekt noch einmal an:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1489432670

Grüße

silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179945094
felipeeugenio (2026-03-16 12:10:35+00:00): Hola. El tag building es para las estructuras. No para el recinto completo. Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179945560
HellMap (2026-03-24 17:39:11+00:00): Šeit https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1489434747 nevarēs būt access=private, jo 35. ēkā ir publiski-pieejams veikals.
Reinis Bērziņš (2026-03-24 18:47:28+00:00): Izlabots.
eggie (2026-03-16 11:35:23+00:00): Dag Reinder,
Ik heb van footway (officieel wandelpad met G7 bord) een highway=path gemaakt met informal=yes en path=desire

Dan zijn de tags voor zo'n paadje.
MVG
eggie
Ltrlg (2026-04-03 05:46:47+00:00): La description du changeset ne correspond pas du tout à la modification ?
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2026-04-03 07:02:47+00:00): Bonjour,

Merci de votre alerte, la correction a été effectuée
Wildsharky (2026-03-25 10:41:29+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:179992269
ajmat (2026-03-19 17:15:54+00:00): Revert of 179945147
eggie (2026-03-16 11:47:12+00:00): Dag Reinder,
Maar nu is de wandelroute weer stuk.
Houd svp rekening met de routerelaties, Die moeten blijven werken.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=179946488
MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-03-16 12:17:31+00:00): Wandelroute loopt nu via het olifantenpaadje.
SomeoneElse (2026-04-04 10:38:03+00:00): Oops - you also need to complete the cycle route https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/61899#map=18/52.781454/-0.862904 !
Sergei Amuzinski (2026-04-04 10:49:37+00:00): Hi! Thanks a lot for catching that! I’ve just completed the cycle route relation based on your comment. I really appreciate the help. Best regards, Sergei.
SomeoneElse (2026-04-04 11:17:57+00:00): Cyclists have to go the right way around the roundabout, so the southbound bit needs adding too.
Sergei Amuzinski (2026-05-14 09:46:45+00:00): Thanks! This should already be fixed in my latest changeset 180862362. Please check if it looks correct now
SomeoneElse (2026-05-14 10:08:22+00:00): Thanks!
eggie (2026-03-16 15:26:54+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
NeisBot (2026-03-16 11:57:48+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/8339166949 v4

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Dentistry office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisAgent (2026-03-16 17:33:13+00:00): 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again?
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-04 13:02:52+00:00): Spam description was re-removed by @impalaa in changeset 179965306, and I cleaned up the remaining SEO spam and malformed tags in changeset 185089819

https://osm.org/changeset/179965306

https://osm.org/changeset/185089819
felipeeugenio (2026-03-16 12:07:12+00:00): Hola. No entiendo. El segmento de service es privado?
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179947804
UnknownV (2026-03-17 13:46:19+00:00): El tramo del camino es público, está cortado el acceso hace años, no está pavimentado y es usado solamente para el acceso a los sitios colindantes, saludos y gracias.
felipeeugenio (2026-03-17 14:36:31+00:00): Buenísimo, gracias
eggie (2026-03-16 12:25:46+00:00): Die routerelatie heb ik weer hersteld. 
Wanneer je routerelaties wilt bewerken dan overstappen naar editor JOSM
Editor iD kan daar niet mee omgaan. 

editor josm stap voor stap
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/editor-josm-stap-voor-stap/75047



Gr eggie
Fraxi (2026-04-14 09:02:26+00:00): Здравейте! Благодаря за добавянето на имената на улиците, но в българското OSM общество е приета практиката да не вписваме "ул." пред името. Повече можете да прочетете на https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bg:WikiProject_Bulgaria#%D0%98%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B0_%D0%BD%D0%B0_%D1%83%D0%BB%D0%B8%D1%86%D0%B8_%D0%B8_%D0%B1%D1%83%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B4%D0%B8 И оттам да придобиете и други теоретични познания за OSM. Ще трябва да се редактират тези улици.
surveyor54 (2026-03-16 15:36:39+00:00): CS Korrektur:
NSG "Waldseenbereich Theresia" Tagging ergänzt.
eggie (2026-03-16 12:28:40+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback Wat is dit voor een fietspad. welk bord staat hier vooraan. Waarom loopt dat fietspad naar een woning?
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-03-16 12:43:57+00:00): Zeker weten dat het een fietspad is? 
Staat er een bord fietspad?
eggie (2026-03-16 15:35:01+00:00): Voorlopig aan gepast naar highway=residential
Mocht er een G13, 12a of 11 staan laat het dan even weten. 

Het fietspad naar woning nr 121 heb ik omgezet naar driveway

MVG
eggie
ilias_ (2026-03-16 19:59:37+00:00): what??
سامي ايت علي ولحسن (2026-03-17 10:30:47+00:00): Although this avenue's official name is Driss Harti, people from Casablanca commonly refer to it as "Chari' chjar" or Trees avenue.
ilias_ (2026-03-17 18:10:18+00:00): 1. You only changed the "name" tag to chari3 chjar and not "name:fr" and "name:ar", which you kept to Chari3 Driss Harti, which is why I was confused.
2. For these cases, you have to use loc_name, and not name. The name is still Avenue du Commandant Driss Harti. loc_name is exactly for names "commonly/locally used". See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Local_names_(loc_name).
سامي ايت علي ولحسن (2026-03-18 14:09:12+00:00): From the wiki definition:


loc_name=* is for the name of a feature as it is known locally, but only where this is deemed to be too much of a slang name or otherwise unofficial-sounding. Ordinarily though, the name which local people use is the name we set in the name=* tag!