piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Map-Peter (2023-06-01 17:09:53+00:00): Hallo HennerKuddel,
 
-> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen#name_ist_nur_der_Name @ https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1177960959/history
NorthCrab_upload (2023-05-31 20:40:15+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/242041920

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
ابونادين العرعري (2023-11-04 14:55:21+00:00): الاسم غير لائق وعنصر قبلي نرجوا تغيير الاسم
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2023-11-04 18:06:45+00:00): تمت ازالة الاسم وشكرا لك على التنبيه
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-01-14 02:29:52+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1177961821 - czy dobrze rozmumiem że na razie to nie istnieje i nie jest nawet w budowie?
silversurfer83 (2023-06-01 07:54:12+00:00): Hi
ohne Quellenangabe / Grund ein Gebäude zu löschen ist nicht sehr hilfreich. Der Nächste sieht auf dem Luftbild ein Gebäude und trägt es wieder ein.
So lange Objekte auf dem Luftbild zu erkennen sind sollte dieses Schema benutzt werden:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix

und grundsätzlich bitte Quellenangabe und Änderungssatzkommentar. Danke :)

silversurfer83

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136805466
clay_c (2023-06-03 15:54:00+00:00): Please stop making changes to the Addicks and Barker Reservoirs. You have once again broken the geometry of the both reservoir relations by leaving several inner polygons outside the outer polygon, and adding new outer polygons inside other outer polygons.

In addition, you have not specified a source other than Bing Maps Aerial, and you have not provided a link to any prior discussion on this topic, which leads me to believe there has never been such a discussion, and you are performing these changes unilaterally without consulting the local community. Please start a discussion on community.osm.org before proceeding with large-scale changes like these.

Would you like to revert these changes yourself, or would you rather I take care of it?
aceman444 (2025-03-14 21:31:59+00:00): Zdravim, pridat wikidata na bod, ktory ma len adresu a ziadny nazov je divne. Nemalo by to byt na dome, o ktorom je polozka wikidata? Ktory je to dom? Cely arcibiskupsky urad?
Tomas_J (2025-03-14 21:53:26+00:00): Čus, neviem presne, ktorá je to časť budovy. Adresu Špitálska 7 a polohu mám z pokožky wikidata.
aceman444 (2025-03-14 22:12:55+00:00): Podla tabule https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1801170745 by to mohla byt cela budova.
Tomas_J (2025-03-14 22:17:30+00:00): Ok, dám na budovu a pridám fixme.
Frans S (2023-06-01 10:09:58+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
I noticed that you often upload a single mapped building. Please collect all mappings till you are finished with a task and upload them in 1 go.
Best regards.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136805647
NorthCrab_upload (2023-05-31 21:00:21+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1046107962

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab (2023-06-08 19:20:10+00:00): Widzę że już poprawiłeś nazwę, teraz jest poprawnie - identyfikator w polu ref. Sorki za późną odpowiedź, pozdrawiam!
user_5359 (2023-06-01 05:14:42+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM classification of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
literan (2023-06-01 17:11:54+00:00): не надо сочинять про "Снежком". Его разбирают.
Clacking (2023-06-02 18:48:25+00:00): Извиняюсь, не заметил, что зона обозначает снос, а не возведение
mavl (2024-11-13 10:14:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159083843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible sources - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16857].
eggie (2023-05-31 21:33:12+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback.. Zaken massaal verwijderen van de kaart ligt gevoelig.
Persoonlijk eigendom wil niet zeggen dat u eigenaar bent van de kaart en data van OSM.
Mappers mogen gewoon binnen de grenzen van de afspraken die we samen maken objecten toevoegen aan de kaart.
Zou kunnen uitleggen waarom deze objecten niet op de kaart zouden mogen?


MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-06-01 07:22:58+00:00): Beste RN..
Ik heb inmiddels een draadje geopend op het forum van OSM.
Daar ben je van harte welkom om te reageren.
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/nieuwe-mapper-verwijdert-data-uit-osm/99681
MVG
eggie
Branko Kokanovic (2023-06-01 17:49:34+00:00): Zdravo, vidim da lepo mapiras, svaka cast!!! Vdiim da si stavio da ti je most ovde "oneway", tj. jednosmeran. To je malo cudno, gledano geometrijski, nijedna aplikacija za navigaciju nece moci da dodje npr. do ovog manastira jer ce misliti da je most samo na dole:) Samo da proverim jel stvarno most jednosmeran ili je vise da je samo za jedan smer u jednom trenutku? Jos jednom - svaka cast za mapiranje!
eggie (2023-05-31 21:38:03+00:00): Beste Rattus
Het vriendelijk verzoek is om te stoppen met het verwijderen van data uit OSM.
Een reactie wordt op prijs gesteld. 
Mvg
eggie
MaxR_6429 (2023-06-01 17:42:50+00:00): Bonjour, 
Si la rue est devenue une "zone de rencontre", la vitesse dans la rue a t'elle été abaissée à 20km/h ? 
L'attribut "maxspeed" est toujours à 30km/h
Merci
djefzo (2023-06-03 05:57:06+00:00): bonjour MaxR
pour l'instant la ville n'a pas mis de nouveau panneau de limitation pour les voitures. 
je referais un changement si cela se produit.
j'ai peu être pas mi le bon intitulé car la rue n'est pas vraiment une zone de rencontre. il y a une voie montante pour les voiture, une ligne blanche continue avec quelque plots de séparation, et une voie vélo double sens et piéton de l'autre côté de la ligne blanche. 
Merci beaucoup d'avoir reprit contact pour clarifié.
MaxR_6429 (2023-06-03 16:22:31+00:00): Bonjour, 
Merci pour votre réponse
Hugoren Martinako (2023-06-02 09:27:18+00:00): Buenas,
¿Por qué eliminas la referencia al INE des Coll? Ahora vuelve a aparecer en el validador: https://osm-es.github.io/validador-ine/
Saludos
pedrojuan01 (2023-06-02 10:14:38+00:00): Disculpas. Estaba haciendo pruebas, porque en muchos mapas basados en OSM no aparece el tópónimo correcto (es Coll d'en Rabassa)  si no algo que no tiene nada que ver (Gentilicio). Por ejemplo pasa en  Strava.
He reincorporado la referencia INE.
Sabes a que se debe que aparezca "Gentilicio" en diferentes mapas?
Hugoren Martinako (2023-06-02 11:09:45+00:00): Ya he visto a lo que te refieres, es muy raro y no tiene nada qué ver con OSM (si miras el historial de este nodo, nunca ha ocurrido tal cambio).

Strava utiliza Mapbox por debajo, por ejemplo si vas a esta otra web que también usa mapbox por debajo, verás que ocurre lo mismo: https://geojson.io

El problema está en Mapbox, sus bases de datos para renderizar las teselas tienen mal asignado el topónimo. Ahora bien, no sé cómo debes comunicarte con Mapbox para informarles del tema.
silversurfer83 (2023-06-01 07:59:56+00:00): Moin 
Steht da ein Schild, dass das "Alter Steinbruch" heißt?
Sonst eher mal hier https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:landuse%3Dquarry gucken und die Sache etwas anpassen

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136806818
dpolovinkin (2026-05-21 14:41:13+00:00): hi, did you see that you added a building above the one which was already there - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1177970993/history causing a warning?

removed it
Warin61 (2023-06-02 01:30:32+00:00): No.
Multipolygon relation outer ways cannot share the same segments. 

If they are 2 seperate buildings then they's usuall have 2 addresses e.g. 8a and 8b. However as they both have the same name (Duetto) I'd take them as the same building .. just with one section having a different height - see building:part for information. 

I leave you to fix this.. see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=151.24103&lat=-33.87661&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways
arctic-rocinante (2023-06-02 10:30:02+00:00): Agreed, thanks for the review. I've attempted to fix it here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136862136
Warin61 (2023-06-03 06:34:00+00:00): Looks good to me.
Nordpfeil (2023-06-02 12:25:37+00:00): Hallo Hendrik,
you put
     max_length = 9.0;gv;bus
As far as I saw in the Wike it should be
     maxlength:hgv = 9 and
     maxlength:bus = 9
What do you mean?
Nordpfeil (2023-06-02 12:26:46+00:00): It is on the street called Neck close to a place with the same name
impiaaa (2023-06-01 19:01:13+00:00): The city boundaries were verified by the Santa Clara LAFCO, the official authority. Please don't change them before checking with SCLAFCO.
Black_Diamond (2023-06-01 23:55:33+00:00): The previous boundary contradicts with San Jose's GIS Open Data at https://gisdata-csj.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/CSJ::city-council-districts-2011-archive/explore?location=37.277603%2C-121.975624%2C18.00

So how do we resolve this contradiction? San Jose's own website says that it's north of the creek and not south of the creek.
impiaaa (2023-06-02 16:48:57+00:00): As I understand it, the purpose of LAFCO is to resolve contradictions between city boundaries within the county. If Campbell and San Jose both agree where the borders are then that's fine, otherwise defer to LAFCO.
Black_Diamond (2023-06-02 19:25:58+00:00): Thanks, based on further review of the maps on https://santaclaralafco.org/resources/maps, I see that there is a more precise definition of parcels and boundaries. Though the previous location from a few days ago was *also incorrect*. So I'll revert this change soon, and reorient it to what is provided by that LAFCO website.
Black_Diamond (2023-06-02 20:13:42+00:00): I reverted the change. The property maps do list SCVWD as the owners of the parcels in the creek. So this change wasn't "wrong", but also the properties do list the parcels being split between San Jose and Campbell. So it wasn't completely correct either.
impiaaa (2023-06-02 22:25:09+00:00): Thanks.
trigpoint (2023-06-04 15:27:05+00:00): Hi Paul
This bridge looks a bit long?

Cheers Phil
Glassman (2023-06-01 19:47:08+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136807842
Glassman (2023-06-01 19:47:49+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136808013
nickel715 (2023-05-31 23:13:58+00:00): Ich habe eine ganze Menge Geometrie Änderungen gemacht. Ich hoffe, ich habe dabei nichts kaputt gemacht.
map per (2023-06-01 19:09:49+00:00): 👍 Sieht gut aus, danke!
MxxCon (2023-06-03 00:25:24+00:00): Rather than name= perhaps ref= tag would be more suitable?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136808879
Frans S (2023-06-01 08:30:04+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136809060
Glassman (2023-06-01 19:49:24+00:00): #TIP: square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q' - they'll look much nicer
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136809179
goedegazelle (2023-06-01 10:33:02+00:00): De website bestaat niet. Gaat deze nog komen?
eggie (2023-06-01 05:46:01+00:00): Dag De Groote..

De info heb ik overgezet naar de adresnode.
Geef ook aan welk soort instelling dit betreft. Dan heeft het pas effect in OSM. 
amenity=social_facility met specificatie.
Svp niet op de gebouwomtrek bijtaggen. 
Ik heb wat aangepast.
MVG
eggie
Glassman (2023-06-01 19:50:24+00:00): Is this edit from a tasking manager project. If so it should include a project number.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136809377
zorglubu (2023-06-03 15:56:53+00:00): Bonjour F5ZV,
L'utilisation du tag name pour indiqué ce qu'est un objet (ici remblai ou esplanade) n'est pas souhaitable dans OSM.
Voir les bonnes pratiques ici : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#Faites_de_bons_commentaires_de_groupe_de_modifications

Je vous prie également de bien vouloir commenter les modifications comme indiqué sur cette même page. C'est important par égard pour les autres contributeurs qui travaillent sur la même zone.

merci beaucoup.
F5ZV (2023-06-08 12:57:54+00:00): Bonjour Zorglubu,
Merci pour la remarque. Entièrement d'accord avec vous et avec les règles.
Le terme "Esplanade" ou "Remblai" ne désigne pas la nature de l'objet mais sont les noms donnés localement aux endroits désignés par les habitants. Ceci dit je ne vois aucun inconvénient à ce que vous les supprimiez. D'ailleurs, sauf défaut de ma mémoire, ce n'est pas moi qui les ai ajoutés.
Commentaire des modifications : c'est vrai que je suis peu bavard dans mes commentaires. Par manque de temps, je ne veux pas passer autant de temps à commenter mon travail qu'à l'exécuter... Au cours de ma pratique je n'ai jamais tiré profit des commentaires des autres, ce qui ne m'a jamais incité à enrichir les miens. Mais je vais faire un effort. Plutôt que de communiquer par l'intermédiaire d'une note, je pense qu'il aurait plus pratique que vous me fassiez part de vos remarques (très constructives) par l'intermédiaire de la messagerie interne. Amicalement.
ivanbranco (2024-03-26 13:18:47+00:00): Is there really a fastfood called "coems 🤑🤑🤑🤑"?
mueschel (2023-06-01 08:53:55+00:00): Hi,
welcome to OSM. Here are a few comments to your edits:

- the 'name' tag is only for the actual name of an object, not for descriptions. 
- please use only the tags that are provided as presets by the editor. 
You added a couple of tags that should not be used, e.g. 'colonia' or 'servicios'
Frans S (2023-06-01 08:29:13+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136810106
user_5359 (2023-06-01 05:11:10+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please note this is a production database. I have deleted your joke entry.
Joseph R P (2023-06-02 19:11:25+00:00): Hello, please try to save your changes in one general vicinity before editing in another to avoid creating such a large changeset box and having your edits queue up in OSMCha for places that you didn't make any edits in. Thanks.
Frans S (2023-06-01 08:24:17+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is also reviewed by a Global Validator,
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings far oversized and not squared. 
Please improve your mapping skills.
I removed all your mappings here due to the poor quality.
Btw. You marked this task as complete mapped despite the majority is not mapped.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136810874
okwithmydecay (2023-07-06 16:35:27+00:00): Hello, why has Martello Street been tagged as cycleway:both=no when it clearly has cycle way markings on it? I've raised a note for this https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3767979
pitscheplatsch (2023-06-04 10:57:18+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136928326
pitscheplatsch (2023-06-04 10:56:09+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136928297
EricTheExplorer (2023-06-01 03:41:59+00:00): This experience was definitely the most interesting thing I've done this past week. I had no idea a program of this caliber and at the same intuitive existed.
Frans S (2023-06-01 09:38:50+00:00): Hi again. Well mapped.
Just don't forget to square the rectangular buildings.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136811223
Frans S (2023-06-01 08:14:36+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
E: Most buildings are fair rectangular. Square them with the Q key when the object is selected.
* When buildings have L,U shape or protruding elements, they should be included into your mappings.
* Please be sure the object you want to map is a building. When there is no shadow next to it, or traces of human activity, it is mostly not a building.  Buildings have mostly a gray or brown roof. Green means trees or scrub.
* Quality prevails over quantity!!



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136811326
OSM_RogerWilco (2023-06-01 06:54:39+00:00): Hallo brgrimm,

Du hast die Post doppelt erfasst. Einmal als eigenständiges Postamt (amenity=post_office) und zusätzlich als Postamt beim Bäcker (amenity=post_annex). Die doppelte Erfassung ist nicht richtig. 

Die Erfassung am Bäcker-Punkt ist fast richtig: In Deutschland gibt es keine Postämter mehr. Stattdessen gibt es nur noch Postdienstleistungen, die vom Einzelhandel angeboten werden. Dies ist auch hier der Fall. Die Bäckerei "Postbäcker" bietet diese Dienstleistungen der Deutschen Post/DHL an. Dies wird beim Bäcker mit post_office=post_partner erfasst. post_office=post_annex wäre wieder ein eigenständiges Postamt, das privat betrieben wird und keine anderen Produkte oder Dienstleistungen anbietet.

Ich habe das korrigiert. 

Viele Grüße
Roger Wilco
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-06-27 16:30:48+00:00): a fonte de dados não deve ser unicamente um mapa oficial, o que importa para o openstreetmap é a realidade. portanto uma via que existe na realidade mas nao no mapa "oficial" deve continuar mapeada e o mesmo vale para vias que estão no mapa "oficial" mas não existem na realidade, estas não devem estar mapeadas. vi que voce deletou vias, só porque não são oficiais. como vias de acesso a patios de empresa etc. não faça assim.
Matheus Vitor (2023-06-27 18:13:22+00:00): Eu vou incluir nas próximas edições a visita in loco, já trabalhei no censo 2022 e trabalho na prefeitura da cidade. Então eu sei o que existe ou não. Quanto aos acessos aos pátios eu vou repor eles, mas na minha cidade tem acessos que simplesmente não existem, tais como loteamentos que não foram para frente, entradas privadas de residências (que não são classificadas como estradas de servidão e dentro da cidade). Esse último que eu citei não vale uma marcação no mapa já que é dentro da cidade e o acesso para apenas uma família, ia ficar bem confuso.
EricTheExplorer (2023-06-01 04:14:32+00:00): Even though I felt a little overwhelmed by the pressure I had from not fully knowing the program. I tried my best to add some building features maps in the village of Maui. I hope this helped just a small bit.
Frans S (2023-06-01 09:35:20+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, at random or as requested. 
I understand that you, as a new mapper suffers with some problems.
Please pay attention to next points:
Default tagging for Buildings = building=yes.
don't add a layer to a building. layers are used at bridges ,roofs of petrol stations.
square each building with the Q key. 
You mapped a warehouse where it seems that the rooflines are not rectangular. optical illusion. image was taken at an angle.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136811639
Frans S (2023-06-01 08:09:26+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 
A question. You map in JOSM. Don't you use the building plugin ? I see a number of mappings which are.,  as far I can see, free-handed drawn and not squared.
with th building plugin you draw always rectangular buildings.
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136811942
Glassman (2023-06-04 20:35:29+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136812235
lipuma (2023-06-02 09:46:55+00:00): Hi oliviers,

In this changeset two nodes got some strange tags:

desc, desc_html, text_fill, text_stroke

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10943472134
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10943472129

Are you sure this is correct?
Frans S (2023-06-01 09:24:22+00:00): Hello.  See my comment on another changeset.
These also apply here
and :  Please avoid that nodes of buildings link to other buildings or roads.
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136812840