piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
afraca (2025-06-04 18:06:49+00:00): Hey eggie, bedankt voor je vlotte review! 
Ik weet eerlijk gezegd niet wat een 'terugmelding' is, of 'bouwvergunning verleend', sorry. Ik kan je vertellen dat het pand in ieder geval normaal in gebruik is, mocht je daar iets aan hebben.
eggie (2025-06-04 18:13:08+00:00): Hoi..
Dat is het punt. Normaal wordt er periodiek geïmporteerd.. maar niet als iets nog op bouwvergunning staat. We tekenen geen gebouwen in. Dat is BAGimport.
Bij een terugmeling kun je aangeven dat het gebouw er al is in werkelijkheid.
Gr eggie
Pontius (2025-06-05 04:30:30+00:00): Is Pentus using the entire building? Last I checked this was a strip mall with multiple tenants.
SFDC123 (2025-06-05 13:40:26+00:00): They have 30,000 sqft and take up about 5 units there. Pretty much almost the entire one side of the plaza.
Hugoren Martinako (2025-09-19 17:36:25+00:00): Hola, la capitalidad del conceyo de Corvera es Nubledo/Nubleo, eso hace que el nodo sea por definición un village, no hamlet

Más info: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Directrices_de_etiquetado_espa%C3%B1olas#N%C3%BAcleos_de_poblaci%C3%B3n
BrackoNe (2025-06-05 05:30:27+00:00): This is vandalism of the map. This is not military area, and some people indeed put temporary tents, but this has no value for the map. If it happens to be added once again - it will be reported to DWG, since this is X time that is getting removed.
Ouioui2 (2025-06-05 08:17:39+00:00): These temporary tents have been present for around 3 months. They were put up in response to protest that would take place a few weeks later in the same area on March 13. Movement in an out is heavely restricted and people stationed inside by the ruling SNS party have and still pose a threat to anyone coming near. The park that is protected as a cultural and nature site is completely destroyed and the traffic Infront of the park has been completely blocked for around 2 months as well. Unfortunately this is the reality right now, these are the facts on the ground maybe labeling them differently would work better (what do you think?). This is a deeply corrupt government willing to do unimaginable things to stay in power and we must not be blind to that.
Ouioui2 (2025-06-05 08:22:06+00:00): And blind to things it does and creates.
BrackoNe (2025-06-05 08:29:58+00:00): Hi Ouioui2,

Thank you for providing more context on the situation. I understand that the presence of these tents and the associated restrictions are significant local issues and represent "facts on the ground" from your perspective.

However, OpenStreetMap has specific guidelines about what we map. Our primary goal is to create a neutral, objective map of verifiable, physical features that have a degree of permanence.

1. Neutrality and Purpose: OSM is not a platform for political statements, advocacy, or to "glory" (or condemn) any political party or event. The map should reflect the physical reality in a neutral way.
2. Temporariness: Features that are explicitly temporary, like protest camps (even if present for several months), are generally not mapped as primary features. OSM aims to map the more permanent landscape. While the definition of "temporary" can sometimes be debated, a protest setup, by its nature, is not usually intended as a permanent installation.
3. Appropriate Tagging: As you acknowledged, labeling this as a military area is incorrect and misleading. If a feature is to be mapped, it must be tagged accurately according to its actual function and characteristics.
4. Data Quality: We strive to keep OSM data clean, consistent, and reliable. This is why major companies trust and use our data. Adding temporary, politically charged, or inaccurately tagged features can compromise this quality – what some might term "trash data" or digital graffiti.

The most appropriate way to represent information about such dynamic situations, especially those with a strong political dimension, is often outside of the main OSM database – perhaps on a dedicated website, a specialized map layer using OSM as a base, or by forking the OSM data for your own purposes, as you rightly suggested could be done with a planet file from Geofabrik.

Our aim is to map the world as it is, focusing on enduring features, not transient events or political disputes. I hope this clarifies the OSM community's general position on such matters.

Nemanja
Ouioui2 (2025-06-05 09:05:55+00:00): Neutrality doesn't really hold up with the way places like Israel and Russia existing (one's actions are emedietly recognized as permanent). 

But ok let's say we have to meet halfway with criminals and say that the camp in facts poses no threat to the civilians nearby.

Shouldn't the lack of acces to a road lasting almost 2 months be treated as important data for routing.
Ouioui2 (2025-06-05 09:17:57+00:00): It's weird to ask but how would you map if at all this situation
BrackoNe (2025-06-05 09:21:14+00:00): I agree that road blockage should be added accordingly, but there are third-party services that set appropriate tags for blockages/constructions/etc. such as Here, TomTom, INRIX, etc.

Please be mindful that OpenStreetMap is database, not service on top of the base layer. To make it easier to understand - OSM doesn't have routing algorithm, but it uses 3 other algorithms, it doesn't even have search engine, but uses Nominatim. So to make it crystal clear - it is database which should have good basic information (for example whole road network and house numbers), and on top of that third parties are building services.
BrackoNe (2025-06-05 09:23:43+00:00): It's weird to ask but how would you map if at all this situation

I wouldn't map this at all since it is a very temporary thing. It is like you ask me how would I map some of the events (like old-timer showcase event few days ago) in Kalemegdan. It is important to have Kalemegdan, all paths, maybe green fields, etc, but event as itself is different layer, not the valuble data.
Ouioui2 (2025-06-05 09:43:06+00:00): I wanted to bring attention to the problem in someway even if just on a site rarely used by the majority of people and see what would happend. But since you say it can't even be done properly then I won't be bothering you anymore. Srećno Nemanja <3
BrackoNe (2025-06-05 09:48:21+00:00): I am aware of the whole situation, and it’s clear why you did that, however, let’s keep this environment as clean as possible!

Cheers, all the best!

Takođe, svako dobro ti želim!
Ouioui2 (2025-06-05 09:57:00+00:00): ❤️
eggie (2025-06-04 16:26:27+00:00): Dag Andreas. Ik heb name= aangepast naar description. Geen name tags gebruiken om iets te beschrijven.
MVG
eggie
rotturdammurt (2025-06-05 12:29:10+00:00): Ok bedankt. Was me niet opgevallen, ik ben nieuw met OSM editen.
eggie (2025-06-05 12:34:15+00:00): Ik zie dat je nog geen welkomstmail hebt ontvangen...  Voor HOTmaps begonnen met mappen buiten Nederland.
Bij deze alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
MichS (2025-06-05 03:21:34+00:00): Hallo,

aus welcher Datenenquelle stammen die Flurnamen, Waldnamen bitte.

Ein CS_Kommentar mit "more info" ist ungenau.

MFG
MichS (2025-06-06 04:04:32+00:00): Bitte vermeiden sie landuseflächen mit Straßen zu verbinden. Das was bei der erstmapping leicht zu machen ist, wird bei späterer Bearbetung aufwendig. Außerdem stimmt öfter nicht das landuse.

MFG
David Rubquín (2026-02-15 18:57:20+00:00): Ni La Vega de Sariego ni Vega de Sariego fueron o son nombres oficiales.
Syl (2025-06-04 17:04:53+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai enlevé le lien vers l'image. C'est fait pour mettre une photo de l'endroit, pas pour mettre un logo.
FCCL-Vandœuvre (2025-06-05 06:41:43+00:00): Ok, je prends note pour les contributions à venir.

Bien cordialement, Axel.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-06-04 16:01:49+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7049186411
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/387447062

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
fayor (2025-06-04 16:13:51+00:00): Modifiche ripristinate perché errate
fayor (2025-06-04 16:13:42+00:00): Modifiche ripristinate perché errate
fayor (2025-06-04 16:13:31+00:00): Modifiche ripristinate perché errate
MichS (2025-06-06 03:59:25+00:00): Hallo,

bitte nennen sie, die Quelle ihrer Daten.: Gipelfhöhe, Namen, Flurnamen.

MFG
user_5359 (2025-06-06 06:06:14+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1392166935. What is the mean of the tag poziom = -1? Did you mean level=-1?
Pastèque24 (2026-06-20 18:46:09+00:00): Bonjour, ce morceau de rue a été fermé par la mairie, et est matérialisé par des marquages au sol
pyram (2025-06-17 11:11:15+00:00): Hi,
Du hast hier (schon wieder) die falsche Adresse eingetragen. Außerdem ist das kein "adding", sonden eine Änderung. Manchmal schadet es nicht, sich Gedanken zu machen, wenn etwas schon anders in den Daten vorhanden ist ;) Schau evtl. in die Historie.
fabiotofy (2025-06-04 19:08:46+00:00): sicuro di quel tag indirizzo associato all'edificio way/36231347 come civico 9 di Via Vittorio Alfieri ? Lì sembra più Via Fautario
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167187220
Đuro Jiří (2025-06-04 19:13:29+00:00): Scusami, però Via Fautario è abbastanza lontano da questo edificio.
Ahtojää (2025-06-07 18:39:15+00:00): Hei! Haluaisitko kertoa perusteista joilla olet muuttanut katuluokkia?
Larmax (2025-06-07 18:53:15+00:00): Moi. Osittain oman kokemuksen ja osittain Digitransitin aineiston perusteella. Digitransitin toiminnalliset luokathan eivät täysin täsmää OSM:n tieluokituksia, joten jos sitä haluaa käyttää liittyy siihen tulkinnanvaraisuutta. Moni tie oli merkitty ainakin omasta mielestäni turhan "korkealle" hierarkiassa, jolloin tieluokitukset menettävät merkityksensä, jos esim. melko vähäliikenteinen Kattilaaksontie, jossa on 30km/h nopeusrajoitus (eli siis vähän läpikulkuliikennettä) olisi secondary-tie.
infeeeee (2025-06-08 10:57:39+00:00): Szia!

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1392170013

Ezt biztos jó irányba rajzoltad? Ez most így azt jelenti, a tisztás van lejjebb. Az ilyen vonalszerű mélyedéseknél a jobb oldal van lent mindig: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural=cliff#How_to_map

Viszont lehet a natural=earth_bank jobban illene erre: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dearth_bank és akkor nem kell leírnod mellé magyarul mi ez.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/252752288

A note többi szerkesztőnek szól. Ilyen leírásokat jobb a description mezőben megadni, azt megjeleníti a sok megjelenítő is, pl OsmAND

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description

További jó térképezést!
savsk (2025-06-05 14:36:18+00:00): Dzięki za poprawkę mojej wcześniejszej pracy w https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1309917043 (26 Stycznia w budowie), mało kto wie jak to wygląda a teraz jest estetyczniej
grzegorz75jan (2025-06-05 08:44:19+00:00): Możesz nam wyjaśnić dlaczego i na jakiej podstawie wykonałeś edycję polegającą na usunięciu obiektów.
Pozostawiłeś jakieś bezsensowne kikuty chodników. Przeglądanie tej zmiany trwa.

"Opis" zmiany nie mówi nic i jest niezgodny z zasadami OSM. Nie podajesz źródeł.

W przypadku braku odpowiedzi, twoje zmiany zostaną wycofane a konto zgłoszone do blokady.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167187997
grzegorz75jan (2025-06-06 06:34:43+00:00): Zauważono zmianę nazwy konta, wycofanie zmiany. Odpowiedzi brak. Wysłano zgłoszenie do DWG.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167187997
user_22970517 (2025-06-06 06:42:25+00:00): Zmiana została wycofana na własną rękę, edycja była wykonana przypadkowo
RodrigoVi (2025-06-22 08:59:47+00:00): voir wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:memorial:conflict?uselang=fr WW1 et non WWI, WW2 et non WWII
benoitdd (2025-06-23 21:18:18+00:00): corrigé, merci du signalement
jmapb (2025-06-19 18:17:31+00:00): Hi vanessatryfi, thanks for your contribution! Boris & Horton is already mapped as a cafe node (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5603534984) so I added the dog=yes tag there. It's part of an existing building, so drawing it as its own building isn't correct -- I deleted the extra building.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-07-03 05:05:34+00:00): DWG revert - inexplicable mapping & unknown sources

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168425292
YomanNH (2026-01-13 11:29:33+00:00): Hej, zauważyłem, że użyłeś złej nazwy - "Małopolskie Linie Dojazdowe". To są Małopolskie Linie Dowozowe. Znalazłem 344 punkty z błędną nazwą: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2iFU. Niestety ja nie potrafię tego masowo szybko poprawić, bo inaczej nie zawracałbym głowy.
TranslatorPS (2026-01-13 11:34:48+00:00): Cześć,
tak, wiem, że z początku dodawałem to z błędną nazwą. Jest to gdzieś z tyłu głowy (a w rejonie tego changesetu i tak będzie do poprawy, bo od 1.01.26 zmieniła się trasa A47), tylko muszę do tego usiąść. Na pocieszenie – poprawna nazwa jest w NSI :)
user_5359 (2025-06-06 06:14:04+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/5812877035. what is the mean of the tag z_fix = zz?
Valenting01 (2025-06-08 17:16:55+00:00): Hello ! This is a mistake. I was going to remove them but I see someone has already deleted these tags.
pyram (2025-06-04 19:21:54+00:00): review:
Alles Bestens.
divulmappeur (2025-06-04 17:42:03+00:00): je rajoute cette source supplémentaire: https://www.sncf-reseau.com/fr/bulletin-officiel/decision-23-novembre-2022-portant-declaration-projet-relative-projet-modernisation-ligne-montrejeau-luchon
grzegorz75jan (2025-06-06 05:21:51+00:00): "zmiany na os. Orkana " dużo to komukolwiek mówi. Ciężko klepnąć, że edycja dotyczy parkingów? Że dodano parkingi !
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167189814
Adava Pays d'Aix (2025-06-05 09:12:01+00:00): Salut O, 
Pourquoi avoir effacé la bande cyclable sur Nostradamus ? Erreur de rue ? Je viens d'y passer ce matin, elle est pourtant toujours bien là, la mairie était même entrain de refaire les peintures !
The-Lorax (2025-06-05 09:50:46+00:00): Coucou,
C'est mes gros doigts avec StreetComplète Android je pense.

Ils refont la peinture côté Est de la rue (Collège)? Parce que côté Ouest (Parc Rambot) y'a rien du tout - ah si, une voie bien étroite et des poteaux-attrape-guidon! ;)
Adava Pays d'Aix (2025-06-05 09:55:31+00:00): Oui coté collège la bande cyclable. Coté Parc effectivement il n'y a plus rien, elle a été retirée il y a quelques années.
The-Lorax (2025-06-05 10:02:57+00:00): Merci, je corrige.
The-Lorax (2025-06-05 10:04:01+00:00): Done.
Szymson (2025-06-04 18:08:17+00:00): Nie rysujemy budynków po zdjęciach satelitarnych, tylko na podstawie: Geoportal 2: Ewidencja budynków WMS
Omikorin (2025-06-04 22:50:49+00:00): Dzięki. Już rozumiem, jeśli szewc nazywa się "Szewc", to nie wnosi to niczego, a także nie zawiera żadnej konkretnej marki.

Tak sprawdziłem delikatesy i hebe w geoportalu i z tego co widzę, jest to oznaczone jako jedna działka. Czy wtedy adres przypisujemy do obu obiektów, czy jednego?

https://mapy.geoportal.gov.pl/imapnext/imap/index.html?moduleId=modulGiK&mapview=51.116585%2C17.056174%2C500s
pavvv (2025-06-05 06:22:31+00:00): @Omikorin lepiej w ogóle nie dodawać tagów adresowych do POI, bo jest to duplikacja adresów. Te istniejące starczą.
maro21 (2025-06-05 20:42:36+00:00): Omikorin: tak, budynek jest na jednej działce, ale działka nie ma tu znaczenia. Obie części budynku mają jeden adres i ten nie powinien być powielony na węźle i na budynku - albo węzeł, albo budynek, chociaż węzeł jest lepszy. Sklepy, jeśli mają ten sam adres to można im dodać. StreetComplete zapytało o adres, bo węzeł, mimo że jest pomiędzy budynkami, to technicznie jest minimalnie po prawej stronie. Dlatego usunąłem podwójny adres.
DaveF (2025-06-08 19:02:57+00:00): This station is not on the Elizabeth line.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/34037748
eggie (2025-06-04 19:13:52+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback   Probeer het gebied van je edits te beperken tot één straat.
Het is anders lastig te controleren.
Gebouwen zijn directe import vanuit het Kadaster. Alles is dan precies ingemeten. Soms wordt er al geïmporteerd terwijl het Kadaster nog moet inmeten. Dan importeren we in de regel opnieuw. Via het forum kun je om import vragen middels het draadje BAG importverzoeken. https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/nl/43

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-06-04 19:20:59+00:00): Beter geen gebouwen verwijderen en opnieuw intekenen. Je kunt beter om nieuwe import vragen. 
Ook niet naar de daken kijken. Daar staan de gebouwen niet. De luchtfoto's zijn schuingenomen. Dus geen puntdaken maken. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-06-04 19:24:52+00:00): Ik heb wat hersteld.
eggie (2025-06-04 19:32:56+00:00): Een terras is geen terrace in het Engels. Ik heb er leisure=outdoor_seating van gemaakt.
Zoek steeds op in de wiki hoe te taggen. Niet zomaar iets toevoegen wat je te binnen schiet.
Gr eggie
Glassman (2025-06-06 02:36:22+00:00): #TIP: The gate is usually placed as a node on the driveway to tell the routers there is a gate there. Can you review this edit and fix as needed?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167192411
DetectiveConan (2025-06-08 14:42:47+00:00): Edit before check
Jens Korth at airport-information dot com (2025-06-08 19:11:56+00:00): Why did you delete the airport node? There is an airport (even if it might be closed), so the airport node is useful. The airport i still listed in the AIP....
JeroenHoek (2025-06-05 08:05:52+00:00): E-mail lijkt me hier niet correct. Dat is een algemeen e-mailadres, niet die van de vestiging in Leeuwarden.

Is wikimedia_commons hier wel zinvol? Daar staan geen foto's van dit kantoor. Alleen wat algemeen PR-spul van Exact.
lipuma (2025-06-06 19:41:58+00:00): Het algemene e-mailadres is toepasselijk voor elk kantoor van het bedrijf, tenzij anders staat aangegeven.

Maar die wikimedia_commons is wellicht inderdaad alleen zinvol op het hoofdkantoor.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-06-04 19:12:30+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Jana Stachury Adama":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10006159090
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12887359711
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12887359718
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12887359773
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12887360572
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12887360573
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12887360574
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12887360575
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12887360576
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12887360577
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12887360578
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12887360579
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12887360580
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12887360581
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12887360582
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12887360583
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12887360584
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12887360585
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12887360623
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12887360624
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12887360625
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12887360626
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12887360627
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12887360638
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12887360639
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12887360640
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12887360641
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12887360642
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12887360643
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12887360644
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12887360645
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12887360646
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12887360647
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12887360648
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12887360649
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12887360650
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12887360651
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12887360652
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/733489673
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/733489674
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/733489675
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/733489676
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/733489677
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/733489687
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/733489690
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/733489691
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/733489692
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/733489693
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/733489694
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/733489695
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1092524650
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1253016746
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1392192807
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1392192808
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1392192809
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1392192813

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
pmckay419 (2025-06-04 22:14:16+00:00): I reverted your changes to the Hey Joe Canyon road. Per OSM rules, we should map what is on the ground. Because this remains a two track road on the ground, it should continue to be tagged as highway=track. Access changes in the BLM travel plan did not remove it from the ground.
pmckay419 (2025-06-04 22:06:04+00:00): Hi, I see you've been changing closed roads in the Labyrinth Rims area to foot tracks. Please refrain from doing this, as roads that are still visible as two tracks on the ground should remain tagged with highway=track, vehicle=no. The change in access rules does not alter the physical route on the ground. If a route is still a two track on the ground that could be driven by vehicles if it were allowed, it should be tagged as highway=track.
pmckay419 (2025-06-04 22:09:58+00:00): Hi, I wanted to let you know I reverted your change to the Tenmile Canyon road. Since that is still a two track road on the ground it should remain tagged as highway=track, motor_vehicle=no. The change in access rules did not alter the physical nature of the road on the ground.
IvaLedinščak (2025-06-17 18:38:15+00:00): Reverted because of an unnecessary node #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167751685
Szymson (2025-06-07 17:13:24+00:00): Akurat tej linii:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1026428961
nie musiałeś usuwać ;)
Szymson (2025-06-07 17:19:21+00:00): Naprawiłem:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167320299
Fizzie-DWG (2025-07-03 05:05:35+00:00): DWG revert - inexplicable mapping & unknown sources

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168425292
Supaplex030 (2025-06-05 19:31:11+00:00): Hey, ich habe hier eine kleine Korrektur bei den Taxiständen vorgenommen (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1318189982 bzw. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1392197481):

Die Stellplätze für Taxis sind im Sinne des OSM-Street Parking-Schemas auch "amenity=parking" (vgl. auch das Beispiel unter https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Street_parking#Park-_und_Halteverbote_2), nur mit der Einschränkung "access=no" + "taxi=designated". Der "amenity=taxi"-Punkt kann dann als Punkt erhalten bleiben, am Besten an der "vordersten" Halteposition des ersten Taxis.

Habe die Fläche und den Taxipunkt hier entsprechend angepasst.

Lg, Alex
fmc_Mlvln (2025-06-30 09:47:52+00:00): Danke, mach ich in Zukunft so.
LG Mlvln
bellaroo (2025-06-09 17:33:39+00:00): Correction: Source used was Maxar satellite imagery via MGP Pro 2025-01-19
YacoobPL (2025-06-04 20:53:57+00:00): Skąd zachowanie landuse=construction i barrier=fence, jeżeli dzisiaj było otwarcie? Dodatkowo: nazwa plac Centralny jest czysto marketingową i nie jest usankcjonowana prawnie ani nie jest używana powszechnie.