piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2025-06-02 10:33:20+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
A remark. 
When you want to map round hut, draw it as shown on this webpage
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/images/8/80/Round-blds-id.gif
You forgot to round the buildings with the O key while selected. Now, just a triangle has been drawn.
I corrected them
Best regards
Frans S (2025-05-28 10:57:39+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
You just mapped 1 building (hut) out of many.  Far oversized. Stay within the outlines of the hut when you draw a triangle and make it round,
Best regards
Gregory Peony (2025-06-05 14:33:58+00:00): This is a valid, accurate and precise footprint. Please map them closer to this standard in future. Please generally upload more changes per changeset (save), I think it's better to save in terms of time e.g. every 5-10 mins or upon completion of a task. It makes them easier to work with. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166865801
Frans S (2025-06-01 11:39:21+00:00): T 122 1 building. Well done
goldfndr (2025-05-31 00:03:38+00:00): Went again the next day; all street lamps along 124th Ave sidewalks between 116th and 120th (other than at 116th intersection and possibly 120th intersection) have been removed during construction and might not be "restored" to the same spots; didn't check between 120th and 124th.
Frans S (2025-05-28 10:54:04+00:00): Hello again.
Most buildings here are round huts.
Please map them accordingly

Check this site
https://learnosm.org/en/hot-tips/tracing-round-buildings/
Best regards
Arif Ali Khan (2025-05-28 11:35:14+00:00): Hi again, Please help me with my query in previous comment. will ensure to do the needful.
Thanks
user_5359 (2025-05-29 16:07:02+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/707256323. What is the mean of the tag Local à vélo = yes?
jawacek (2025-05-28 09:50:28+00:00): Ok. Przepraszam, jeszcze nie ogarniam do końca tych tagów. 
Ale mamy zgodność, że główną nazwą jest Kowalska Góra? Taka nazwa jest na tabliczce i pieczątce na szczycie i do tej pory zawsze słyszałem taką nazwę. Nie jest to oczywiście niepodważalny argument, ale zdaje mi się to najpowszechniejsza nazwa tego szczytu
bergaufsee (2025-06-01 20:02:08+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OSM.
Grundsätzlich ist es ok einen Parkplatz einfach als Punkt in der Mitte anzulegen. Detaillierter und somit besser ist es allerdings als Fläche, wie hier unter https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/22763022 bereits geschehen. Der Punkt ist damit nicht mehr erforderlich, ich habe ihn daher wieder gelöscht.
Ich wünsche dir trotzdem natürlich weiterhin viel Spaß beim mappen, bei weiteren Fragen kannst du dich gern auch bei mir melden.
Frans S (2025-05-28 11:03:30+00:00): Hello again.
Also thess buildings are mapped far oversized. 
I corrected them.
Zoom in far enough to be able to map the correct size !
Best regards
NeisBot (2025-05-28 09:45:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-05-30 07:10:47+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/166955591
hNdrX_ (2025-05-30 20:26:44+00:00): damit auch "WinsenRad" enthalten ist, habe ich es als "network=WinsenRad" hinzugefügt. siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:network%3Dnextbike
Frans S (2025-06-03 14:32:10+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this task.
Your mappings are fine.
But, please do not add a hashtag as a name to a building.
Just building=yes.
Best regards
Frans S (2025-05-28 11:00:09+00:00): Hello again 
Please map the round huts within their rooflines. Your mappings are way too big and does not reflect the situation.
Best regards
Hufkratzer (2025-05-28 20:45:46+00:00): Hi,
I assume that "Keith & Cash Asmussen - El Primero Training Center" is a training center for horse racing (racecourse). In this case it should be tagged with leisure=sports_centre + sport=horse_racing instead of leisure=horse_riding, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a#Racecourse_(horse_racing)
JoeSanch1105 (2025-05-29 08:10:11+00:00): Thanks. I just fixed it on Changeset: 166907378
user_5359 (2025-05-29 15:38:40+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/459989204. What is the mean of the tag EDRPOU = 44728494? Did you mean ref:edrpou?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-07-02 13:46:09+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12870704621/history - w sensie że można kupić/wymienić zbiorniki z gazem?

magazyn gazu jakiegoś domu?

przemysłowy magazyn gazu?

coś innego?
SomeoneElse (2025-05-30 09:09:21+00:00): Hello,
What was the source of these changes?
Best Regards,
Andy
MihaelIvanjek (2025-05-30 15:50:54+00:00): Hi! 
I used signs that I found on bing streetside indicating a weight limit of 7.5 along with an exception for access. One set of two signs can be found about right where Ince Lane meets Ash Road, and the other is very slightly down Ince Lane where Orchard Park Lane meets it. Hope that explains it! 
Best Regards,
Mihael
SomeoneElse (2025-05-30 16:46:00+00:00): Thanks - are these technically maxweight or maxweightrating?

The latter is probably the more common (designed to keep hgvs off some roads, whether loaded or not), but the former also occurs (e.g. on weak bridges - where you also see axle limits).
MihaelIvanjek (2025-05-30 17:31:10+00:00): Perhaps the more "correct" tag would be maxweightrating, however, before we (OptimoRoute*) started mapping in the UK we looked into how it's been done so far - and generally from what we saw mappers up until now used maxweight for the vast majority of signs, while reserving maxweightrating for bridges and the like (for signs which specifically point out maximum gross weight, for example). 
As such, we decided to opt for the more common tag both to respect the local customs, so to say, but also to perhaps even reduce confusion for less experienced mappers not familiar with the other tag. 

*If you want to perhaps read about our project, you can do so here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities/OptimoRoute.
SomeoneElse (2025-07-03 10:02:34+00:00): For info, you might be interested in the forum topic https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/maxweight-meaning-and-maxweightrating/132190/1 .
MarkoŠatrak (2025-08-03 03:55:02+00:00): I am writing here as a leader of OptimoRoute organised editing activity
(osm.wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities/OptimoRoute) for anyone who might be tracking this changeset.

The concern raised by @SomeoneElse is being discussed here: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/optimoroute-organised-editing-activity-in-the-uk-truck-hgv-access/129894/2
VA00 (2025-07-29 12:59:22+00:00): What is that, a joke ?
user_5359 (2025-05-29 15:24:07+00:00): Hallo! Bitte schau Dir https://www.osm.org/way/1390409097 noch mal an (ein von drei Objekten). Was bedeutet oper = Wirgarten? Meinst Du eventuell den Schlüssel operator
m_fuhrmann (2025-06-01 11:41:31+00:00): Hi! Ja, das war wohl ein Auto-Fill Fail meinerseits. Sorry. Und danke fürs Fixen (falls du es warst), denn jetzt steht es auf operator.
Aber es beruhigt mich, dass das noch irgendwie auffällt, auch ohne, dass ich um Review gebeten haben :+1:
mardiz (2025-05-28 10:48:02+00:00): super!
aceman444 (2026-05-06 08:49:50+00:00): No, the previous location was correct.
O Bicho Geográfico (2025-06-11 12:57:18+00:00): Olá. 
Vi que alterou nome do camping e incluiu nome na cachoeira. 
O camping é de fato Sítio Vanessa, sem o "da". E a cachoeira, qual a fonte do nome? Pois já investiguei com o dono da propriedade e nem ele a nomeou.
Henri Riehs (2025-06-12 12:20:19+00:00): Bom dia, sítio Vanessa corrigido.
Sobre o nome da cachoeira, só colocar o nome no Google q retornam vários links com a trilha ou localização dela. Se não é o nome oficial, pelo menos é o q a maioria das pessoas chama.
O Bicho Geográfico (2025-06-12 12:27:56+00:00): Bom saber.
Andrea Musuruane (2025-05-29 08:07:06+00:00): House numbers are not literally "house" numbers in Italy - they are more "entrance" numbers. It is the number associated with the external access that leads from the circulation area (street, square, etc.) to property units (dwellings, shops, offices, garages, etc.) or to unbuilt enclosed areas (e.g. beach clubs). Therefore it is wrong to tag buildings with addr:housenumber. Moreover what are these "addr:state=88" tags? We don't use addr:state in Italy. BR, Andrea
silversurfer83 (2025-05-28 14:04:08+00:00): Ich schon wieder ;)

bist du dir hier mit dem Namen sicher?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen#Namen_sind_keine_Beschreibungen

Schönes Wochenende :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166869317
frydzio (2025-05-29 08:15:59+00:00): Hello,
What is the source of this change? Only Esri Imaginery? I have to verify it in place but there is/was a water tap hidden on the wall, look here https://www.google.pl/maps/@52.2082086,21.0834035,3a,15y,176.64h,77.72t/data=!3m8!1e1!3m6!1sbrJ6ZpnC04i6kcPCPZHBTg!2e0!5s20220301T000000!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fcb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26pitch%3D12.27710019339662%26panoid%3DbrJ6ZpnC04i6kcPCPZHBTg%26yaw%3D176.63516457795765!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI1MDUyNi4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D
NeisBot (2025-05-28 10:45:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description
NeisReview (2025-05-30 07:09:22+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/166955534
silversurfer83 (2025-05-28 14:05:57+00:00): Moin :)

dürfen wir diese GPX-Daten überhaupt nutzen?

Außerdem sehen die Wege auf dem Luftbild eher nach "track" als nach "path" aus (sprich: dort sind Spuren zweispuriger Fahrzeuge zu sehen).

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166869519
Murat Kayı (2025-05-28 20:29:48+00:00): Hi,

Danke für die Nachfrage! GPX hat der Tourismusverband mir eigens zur Verfügung gestellt. Das ist also kein Problem.

Kann ich die Eigenschaften der "Linie" von Pfad auf Track umstellen oder wie gehe ich da vor?

Beste Grüße 
Mu
silversurfer83 (2025-05-28 21:12:01+00:00): Hi.

Danke für die schnelle Rückmeldung :)

Find ich gut, dass der Verband da mitarbeitet.

Die "Linie" (bei OSM ein sogen. "way") lässt sich folgendermaßen bearbeiten:
Navigiere zunächst möglichst nah an das Objekt heran und starte nun den Editor mit Hilfe der Schaltfläche "Bearbeiten".
Wähle nun einen Pfad aus und klicke in Abschnitt "Objekttyp" (also in der linken Spalte ganz oben) auf "Pfad". Nun erscheint ein Suchfeld in welches du "Wald" eingeben kannst. Du solltest als Vorschlag "Feld-/Waldweg" sehen. Wähle diesen aus. Fertig ist der Waldweg.

Gleiches Spiel mit dem Nachbarpfad.

Du kannst diese Wege auswählen und in der Spalte links nach unten scrollen bis der Abschnitt "Eigenschaften" erscheint. Diesen ausklappen um alle Eigenschaften der Linie im Klartext zu sehen. Diese Schlüssel und Werte sind es, die auch im Wiki (wiki.osm.org) erklärt werden.

Bei Fragen immer gerne raus damit
silversurfer83
Murat Kayı (2025-05-28 21:14:57+00:00): Danke für die Erklärung,  mach ich!

Liebe Grüße 
Mu
gurglypipe (2025-05-28 12:06:25+00:00): Heya, are you sure about this; what’s your source?

If this bit of parking aisle is one-way, then why is there a ‘no entry’ marking on the road where the give way node is (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9366722074)? It wouldn’t be necessary if this bit of parking aisle was one-way.

In addition, if this bit of parking aisle was one-way, the accessible parking space (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1384940581) would only be reachable by doing a lap of the building, which seems unlikely (but possible).

I’ve not surveyed, I’m only going off aerial imagery — so if you’ve surveyed it I’ll definitely defer to you. I just wanted to check :)
Kaduna (2025-05-28 14:18:41+00:00): Hi gurglypipe, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you.
Kaduna (2025-05-29 09:39:27+00:00): Hi gurglypipe, Thank you for your patience.

I have made the edit using Bing Aerial Imagery where lane markings are indicative of travel directions. Then I have verified with TomTom proprietary sources showing the traffic flow in that segment is mostly consistent with the one-way tag.

However, your suggestion also makes sense in terms of practicality and accessibility. There is minimal movement at that section in the opposite direction and it may be because that might be a lesser-preferred section by the customers. 

I have made the corrections according to your suggestions. But I think additional ground truth is required to confirm this situation confidently.
gurglypipe (2025-05-29 10:06:14+00:00): Hi Kaduna, thanks for taking the time to check other sources and adjust the tagging again :)

I agree a survey would be the best next thing to do, to verify the ground truth. I’ll open a note here, which should pop up if someone’s surveying the area (e.g. with StreetComplete).

Hope you have a good day :)
Jakub Sýček (2025-05-30 19:55:53+00:00): Thank you for your contributions!
Please review: In the Lidl parking garage, I see you marked a crossing as not button-operated but with tactile indications (vibrations). I don't have any street-level imagery for the location but this is suspiscious, the tactile traffic light indication is usually at the bottom of the button box. On the other hand, I find it plausible that the buttons at the Dornych×Plotní intersection vibrate since they were just installed this year - but please note that it is necessary to feel by hand since some units have the vibration turned off in software.
Yunkers (2025-05-28 17:23:44+00:00): Hej, 
Byłes już wielokrotnie informowany, że zmiany kategorii należy przedyskutować. 
Dodatkowo, jesteś pewny, że to główna droga Góra-Polkowice? Z czego to wynika?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-31 10:20:14+00:00): wycofane w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167005651 ze względu na brak dyskusji przed
eggie (2025-05-28 13:30:16+00:00): Dag Marco... 

Die oneway=yes komt niet uit de lucht vallen...  Waarom opeens geen eenrichtingsverkeer meer?
De uitzonderingen op oneway=yes staan nog allemaal in de tagging.
Dat is van tweewielers tot openbaar vervoer.
Wat is dan nu allemaal veranderd?
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=166871048

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-05-28 13:33:12+00:00): Geldt dit wellicht voor de brandweer en is het voor regulier verkeer gewoon oneway=yes
Dus oneway:emergency=no
en oneway=yes terugzetten.
Marco Ubaghs (VRZL) (2025-05-28 14:09:34+00:00): Op deze brug is al jaren tweerichtingsverkeer. Er geldt wel een geslotenverklaring, behalve voor lijnbussen, taxi's en brommobielen, zie ook:
https://www.google.com/maps/@50.8518926,5.6978425,3a,15y,257.27h,90.13t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sQ11mSZ2DFQu1enbe_zQB7A!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fcb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26pitch%3D-0.13084924296526879%26panoid%3DQ11mSZ2DFQu1enbe_zQB7A%26yaw%3D257.2721041696!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI1MDUyMS4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D

Deze borden staan er nog steeds.
eggie (2025-05-28 15:12:01+00:00): Volgens mij mocht je wel van west naar oost voor regulier autoverkeer, maar niet van oost naar west

Ik zie trouwens dat nu ook een stuk aan oostzijde om motor_vehicle=no staat.  .. dus het zal helemaal niet routeren voor regulier auto verkeer. 
Daar stond in het verleden een conditionatag op motor_vehicle:backward=no
Er was dus iets bijzonders aan de hand.
De voorgaande mapper heeft dat aangepast naar motor_vehicle=no 
Geen idee of dat terecht was.
Er staat nu wel een hele zinloze riedel uitzonderingen op de brug om die oneway=yes te overrulen voor bepaalde categorieën.
Mag je wel met een auto/motorfiets van west naar oost? 
De accesstagging klopt in ieder geval niet op deze manier.

Zal even Martin Borsje inseinen of hij nog naar zijn aanpassing wil kijken.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-05-28 15:17:59+00:00): De bebording laatst gezien 2022
https://smoothefiets.ddns.net/html/verkeersbordenkaart/index.php?lat=50.852409363&lng=5.696287751&z=18
Martin Borsje (2025-05-28 16:21:04+00:00): Afgezien van het feit dat er momenteel werkzaamheden zijn of de aanliggende Franciscus Romanusweg en de wilhelminasingel tijdelijk voor alle verkeer muv lijnbussen en fietsers en bromfietsers afgesloten is (maar daar taggen we in OSM niet voor) is de Wilhelminabrug zelf in oostelijke richting voor alle verkeer geopend; in westelijke richting slechts voor fietsers, voetrgangers, brommers, taxi's, lijnbussen en brommobielen. Aan deze situatie is niets veranderd.
eggie (2025-05-28 16:34:15+00:00): Oke Martin... maar dan zal dat motor_vehicle =no  op dat kleine oostelijke stuk weer aangepast 'moeten' worden naar motor_vehicle:backward.. en de oneway=yes weer op de brug getagd kunnen worden?
Even uit mn hoofd.. want nu op mn mobiel.
Martin Borsje (2025-05-28 17:37:09+00:00): E.e.a. aangepast en versimpeld. N.B. Ik werk op 100 m afsteand van de brug en loop daar ongeveer ieedere weekdag over.
eggie (2025-05-28 17:58:03+00:00): Top Martin... 
Wellicht reageert Marco nog voor overleg.

Groet..
eggie
puma515 (2025-05-28 23:03:23+00:00): Moin, Da du in der Kielerstraße den kompletten Gehweg und die zufahrt gelöscht hast musste ich deine komplette änderung zurücksetzen da ein einzelndes wiederherstellen nicht mehr möglich war. 

Wege sind nun wieder vorhanden habe aber da es nicht viel war und die daten wichtig sind noch deine neu erfassten hydranten wieder eingetragen. 

Bei Löschwasserteichen waren ein teil schon erfast dort kommen die daten wen schon erfasst auf die gewässerfläche und benötigen kein extra node das wäre dan nur eine doppelte erfassung.

Schön gruß puma515
puma515 (2025-05-28 23:26:37+00:00): Danke das du die hydranten in Hohenwestedt vervolständigst. 
Habe eben nochmal über alle Hydranten drübergeschaut und bis auf ein paar hast du alles gut erfasst. 

Achte nur zukünftig drauf keine Hydranten mit andren objekten zu verbinden da hydranten immer nur als einzelner Punkt erfast werden da das genauer ist da Straßen oder Gehwegelinien jeweils nur die mitte des Weges dastellen. die betroffen 6 Hydranten habe ich grade noch getrennt und 1mm verschoben somit sollte das noch passen.
Nakaner (2025-05-28 11:32:22+00:00): In addition, the reverted changeset added non-factual information/advertising text and used strange tag values.
NeisBot (2025-05-28 11:39:49+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description
NeisBot (2025-05-28 11:53:06+00:00): Hi Nukavarapu Eswar Chowdary, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Added a new meadow area with a corresponding name tag, including creation of necessary nodes and way."

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment #AIgenerated #Gibberish
eggie (2025-05-28 13:21:59+00:00): Welkom bij OSM,
Ik heb een companytag toegevoegd.. en name= Heijmans Vloeronderhoud
anders zie je niets op de kaart.
MVG
eggie
Leo1590 (2025-05-28 14:15:05+00:00): Hola, el barrio ya se encuentra mapeado como una relación. No es necesario agregar un landuse=residential
Lezurex (2025-05-28 15:42:29+00:00): Hallo Mystique-1440,

Willkommen auf OpenStreetMap.

Zu deinen Änderungen (auch deine anderen Changesets): Du löschst hier ganz viel Information raus. Praktisch jede Schule (zumindest in der Schweiz) wird ausserhalb der Schulzeiten als "Park" gebraucht. Deswegen taggen wir sie aber noch lange nicht als solche. In erster Linie ist es immer noch eine Schule, sie wurde als Schule gebaut und wird als Schule gebraucht (ich würde mal behaupten, man sieht dort überwiegend Schulkinder, nicht?). Dann die Schule einfach rauszulöschen ist schlicht falsch.

Übrigens: Der building-Tag gibt an, als was das Gebäude gebaut wurde. Ein Gebäude kann also building=school sein, auch wenn es nicht mehr als solche genutzt wird.

Das GZ Loogarten ist bereits hier eingetragen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5173009855

Ich würde drum vorschlagen, das rückgängig zu machen.

LG Lezurex
micheleOSM3 (2025-05-29 13:48:26+00:00): Have you personally hiked trail 605?Have you seen the trail markers (osmc:symbol=red:red:white_stripe:605:black) on the variation of the route you mapped?
mk2k22 (2025-05-29 14:22:59+00:00): Hi, I used 2 gpx files of my acquaintance's who hiked one part of 605 in Aug 2020 and the other one in Oct 2021, respectively. According to him, he stuck to the marked route. 

As far as I can see, the last changes to the path in OSM were made in Jun/Jul 2020 (and some even in 2018), which is before the gpx's I used for reference. My corrections according to the gpx also align with Strava heatmap and the latest ortophoto (where the path is visible) you provided me with before. 

If you believe that some changes are incorrect, please feel free to correct.
mk2k22 (2025-05-29 14:31:39+00:00): If there are any specific sections of 605 that you are concerned about, please do let me know which parts in particular - and I’ll recheck with my acquaintance.
micheleOSM3 (2025-05-29 15:10:49+00:00): This is the official .GPX file of the CAI (Italian Alpine Club), the organization that maintains the trail and physically draws the symbols on the ground:
https://trailsfvg.42web.io/GC/MxGpxView.html?fileGpx=605%202022T-V1.gpx

If you also set the "waymarked trails" layer, you can see your biggest variation: the one that starts at 800 meters and reaches 900 meters.
Passes on a forest road that exists, but it is not the official CAI trail.

I'll try to ask the CAI for confirmation.

Your other minor variations could be valid, I haven't checked them.
mk2k22 (2025-05-30 06:13:08+00:00): Yes, I see that variation now - you are talking about this track, correct? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1389544922

This one was previously not even mapped! So I added it and mapped 605 on this new track as per my colleague's gpx and this description where it clearly says to go RIGHT (and later pass by the cottage/hut), not left: https://www.hike.uno/view_tour/malborghetto_cima_alta_due_pizzi_path_605/560300

From the picture itself, it seems that there is indeed a marking on the right tree if you look closely. Implying that this track would be the correct way: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1389544922

But do check with CAI if possible and we can correct if needed.