piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2023-04-02 16:42:16+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 


Feedback... Maar warom zou je een buurt omcirkelen met de maam Berghemse weg zuid?  Met welk doel? 

Je edits 
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=134420059
Je lijnelement zit ook op verschillende plaatsen aan woningen vast. 
Verder heb je ook stukken landuse grass en een begraafplaats verwijderd van de kaart. 
Het lijkt me beter dat ik dit terugdraai.

MVG,
Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-04-02 16:53:29+00:00): reverted by changeset #134422292

Wanneer je nog vragen hebt stel ze gerust.
Wees svp voorzichtig met de kaart. 
Je hoeft geen landuse=residential in te tekenen. Dat is al gebeurd. 
Wanneer dit een buurt is met een officiele naam kan dit worden toegevoegd op een node place=neighbourhood.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dneighbourhood
Die node zet je dan ergens midden in de wijk. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-04-02 17:26:45+00:00): Ik heb Berghemseweg-Zuid op een node gezet bij de Goudmijnstraat. 
Rendering duurt even.
Paar keer ctrl f5
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-04-02 17:31:26+00:00): https://allecijfers.nl/buurt/berghemseweg-zuid-oss/
De andere buurten zou je zo ook kunnen toevoegen met place=neighbourhood

De hele wijk heet Schadewijk en tag je dan weer op een node place=quarter
name=Schadewijk

MVg
eggie
b-unicycling (2023-04-07 17:03:51+00:00): is the photograph only on geograph, not on wikicommons? could you link with image= anyway?
danieldegroot2 (2023-04-08 20:08:03+00:00): Newer Geograph images do not seem to be imported to Wikimedia Commons.
Since this is true for quite a number of them, I would personally like to refrain from cluttering OSM with these external links.
Any Commons links still missing can be easily added later.

Regards,

Daniel
b-unicycling (2023-04-09 08:52:56+00:00): It's on the exploration list for today, so I might get a photo for Wikicommons anyway.
samuel_geovelo (2024-05-29 15:03:25+00:00): Bonjour, nous avons eu des retours d'utilisateur nous indiquant que la barrière était également fermée aux cyclistes, pouvez vous nous le confirmer svp ? Merci et cordialement, Samuel de Geovelo
samuel_geovelo (2024-05-29 15:04:52+00:00): (les barrières de l'UCPA entre le col du Manet et le chemin des Solitaires, je précise ;) )
Guillaume Castagnino (2024-05-29 15:13:28+00:00): Bonjour,

Effectivement, je n’avais pas fais attention aux tags sur les portails quand j’avais fait une passe dans le quartier, mais si on parle bien des 2 barrières qui coupent ce way : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/115189840 ce sont 2 portails hauts généralement (tout le temps ?) fermés au public.
samuel_geovelo (2024-05-29 15:22:12+00:00): ok ça marche merci ! j'ajoute l'info ;)
DD1GJ (2023-04-02 17:48:37+00:00): highway=service wieder hergestellt
wolfbert (2025-06-07 17:57:09+00:00): Hallo, nach den Mapillary_bildern scheint die Todesco-Gasse eine Wohnstraße zu sein; dann könnte da die 30er-Zone weg. Kannst Du Dich da noch erinnern?
WaWei (2025-06-15 09:13:35+00:00): Hallo, hast natürlich recht. Kann mich - ehrlich gesagt - nicht mehr erinnern, dass ich das eingetragen habe. Wusst wahrscheinlich damals noch nicht, dass in Wohnstraßen Schrittgeschwindigkeit gilt.
Hab's jedenfalls wieder gelöscht.
wolfbert (2025-06-16 13:05:28+00:00): Danke, traffic_sign könnte man noch setzen.
WaWei (2025-06-29 15:39:27+00:00): Erledigt!
NorthCrab_upload (2023-04-02 16:10:25+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/438044072
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1158882092

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
citrula (2023-04-20 19:17:01+00:00): Hi csomerville, what are your thoughts about the spillway feature? I'm not sure what it looked like before the park opened but it is certainly not a canal currently.
csomerville (2023-04-20 21:47:30+00:00): Milroy1812 is the original mapper and might have more insight. It looks like he has mapped a number of spillways at local dams.

I don't think this is/was the primary spillway but perhaps the auxiliary / emergency spillway? Milroy1812 also mapped a spillway for Site 7, which appears to be an auxiliary spillway, though it isn't explicitly labeled as such. It's worth noting that their mapping of the other spillway doesn't seem to entirely match the designed flow from what I can determine via media reports from when it was constructed but I'm no expert.

For this site, I found a reference in Upper Brushy Creek WCID's "Dam Portfolio Prioritization Summary Report" that reads "the City of Cedar Park constructed the Buttercup Wastewater Interceptor and Reclaimed Water Line through the auxiliary spillway. The line was installed within the auxiliary spillway and the top of the excavation was covered with a 2 foot concrete cap." I reviewed GIS data from Cedar Park and found the engineering plans for the project. It suggests this feature as mapped is at least somewhat or in part correct as it intersects with the aforementioned lines. 

Perhaps we can reach out to the city and/or Upper Brushy Creek WCID. 

Also, see diagrams at https://www.ubcdams.org/193/Typical-Dam-Design for what we should be looking for typically.
citrula (2023-04-21 02:14:38+00:00): I see. I have a hunch that the primary spillway is what's currently marked as a culvert. There is a small concrete platform at the bottom of the reservoir side of the dam which I have not actually gone down to near the termination of the culvert on OSM.
csomerville (2023-04-21 08:06:05+00:00): Right. Having done further reading, my understanding is that what's tagged as the culvert (which should be tagged waterway=pressurised + tunnel=flooded instead of culvert I suspect) is the outlet which is horizontal pipe permitting flow through the dam controlled by a drain gate near bottom of the reservoir. There is a riser with a trash rack which is what is visible there in the water. It is the service/primary spillway and connects to same pipe to regulate reservoir releases additional to the outlet.

As for the featured mapped as spillway: Reviewing FEMA Watershed Models and Floodplain Mapping, at each of the damn sites Milroy1812 has mapped a spillway that corresponds to a Special Flooding Hazard Area zone leading me to believe that they are the auxiliary/emergency spillways.  From my reading, earthen damns built during the era these were often just used vegetated / earth emergency spillways like this that can best be approximated by a broadcrested weir.
mueschel (2023-04-15 11:24:51+00:00): Hallo,
was heißt denn "taktbus=yes"? Das Tag gibt es sonst nirgends.
Chrisss Gü (2023-04-26 19:13:05+00:00): Hallo, 
mit Plusbus und Taktbus werden in Teilen Deutschlands die Buslinien klassifiziert und gegenüber den Fahrgästen kommuniziert. https://plustaktbus.de/

Wusste jetzt nicht genau wie ichs eintragen soll, deswegen hab ichs erstmal schnell so gemacht.
Viele Grüße
DD1GJ (2023-04-02 17:45:20+00:00): Bitte die genaue Höhe eintragen, z.B. 3.1
streckenkundler (2023-04-07 20:56:56+00:00): Sollte revertet werden, da Vandalismus-Verdacht im Raum steht! Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/134398403
Bobbi123 (2023-04-07 21:30:40+00:00): Muss ich entschieden zurückweisen, da die Löschungen gemäß der Kriterien im Wiki für abgebrochene Bahnstrecke geschah bzw. diese für die gelöschten Gleise nicht ausreichen. Begründung dazu siehe auch: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/134398403#map=11/49.5733/9.9859

Ich muss drauf hinweisen, dass mich der User in diesem Chanceset persönlich beleidigt, abgewertet und ad hominem angewendet hat, als die Sachebene verlassen hat. Diese Emotionalität war hier keinesfalls legitim.
MarinoBM (2023-04-02 21:52:18+00:00): Hola Arturo Francisco Barbero, no se puede cambiar una vía rápida (N-601) a autovía (A-60) por el hecho de que a ti te lo parece. Los tramos están perfectamente definidos en el Catálogo oficial de la Red de Carreteras del Estado y hay que seguir las directrices para la clasificación de carreteras.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Directrices_de_etiquetado_espa%C3%B1olas#V%C3%ADas_interurbanas
Arturo Francisco Barbero (2023-04-07 18:50:47+00:00): El trazado de la autovía por Valladolid es "ref=A-60"
MarinoBM (2023-04-10 09:40:56+00:00): La Autovía Valladolid-León es la A-60 y la antigua, la Carretera Adanero - León es la N-601. El comentario es porque a algunos tramos de la N-601 (vía rápida) les has dado valor de la A-60 (autovía).
Voy a repasar ambas vías, sus referencias y la relación de ruta de la autovía.
complete_gth (2023-04-02 16:32:15+00:00): Moin wermak,
du hast glaube ausversehen das landuse=residential von Bad Langensalza gelöscht (vorher im Changeset #134417225 in highway=service verändert). Evtl. kannst du da mal schauen.

VG
complete_gth (2023-04-02 16:34:35+00:00): Ich sehe gerade https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1159200183 ist ein Teil des ehemaligen landuse.
gscscnd (2023-04-02 18:51:45+00:00): Węzeł railway=milestone powinien być częścią toru, railway=track. W wartości tagu jako separator części dziesiętnej powinna być kropka, nie przecinek.
m_p_13 (2023-04-02 18:56:20+00:00): Dzięki za podpowiedź. Logiczne. Fizycznie słupki są raz po prawej, raz po lewej od toru.
gscscnd (2023-04-02 19:07:56+00:00): Oczywiście mapowanie ich osobno ma pewien sens, chodziło mi tylko o trzymanie się konwencji. Po której stronie znajduje się słupek możesz oznaczyć tagiem railway:signal:position. Zobacz <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenRailwayMap/Tagging#Kilometer_signs/mileposts> i <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenRailwayMap/Tagging/Signal#General_Tags>.
streckenkundler (2023-04-07 20:56:42+00:00): Sollte revertet werden, da Vandalismus-Verdacht im Raum steht! Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/134398403
Bobbi123 (2023-04-07 21:30:36+00:00): Muss ich entschieden zurückweisen, da die Löschungen gemäß der Kriterien im Wiki für abgebrochene Bahnstrecke geschah bzw. diese für die gelöschten Gleise nicht ausreichen. Begründung dazu siehe auch: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/134398403#map=11/49.5733/9.9859

Ich muss drauf hinweisen, dass mich der User in diesem Chanceset persönlich beleidigt, abgewertet und ad hominem angewendet hat, als die Sachebene verlassen hat. Diese Emotionalität war hier keinesfalls legitim.
RidecoBrad (2023-04-17 17:47:33+00:00): Hello Crazy2b,
Just curious why you changed this from highway=unclassified to highway=road.
According to aerial imagery highway=unclassified seems reasonable.
Note that highway=road is treated as an error (see here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=road?uselang=en-GB).

Thanks!
gscscnd (2023-04-02 18:56:33+00:00): <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/443568149>, <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1159205457>, <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1159205458> — jesteś pewien, że to są drogi utwardzone?
m_p_13 (2023-04-02 19:13:41+00:00): Zostały wysypane grubo tłuczniem i już zdrowo ubite przez transport drewna z lasu.
Świeże ślady ciężarówek widać wyraźnie.
gscscnd (2023-04-02 19:28:19+00:00): Dobrze ubite to byłoby surface=compacted, ewentualnie surface=fine_gravel, zobacz <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:surface>. paved to asfalt, beton itp., taka jednolita, spójna, twarda i trudna do odkształcenia nawierzchnia.
m_p_13 (2023-04-02 19:40:40+00:00): Jutro to ogarnę.
Dzięki za podpowiedź.
Notabene, jeździłem po drogach gorszej jakości, mieniących się autostradami...
gscscnd (2023-04-03 06:13:32+00:00): Przy okazji: do surface=compacted pasowałoby tracktype=grade2 lub nawet grade1. To taki ogólniejszy tag, niezależny od konkretnej nawierzchni.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tracktype
jtracey (2023-04-02 16:56:01+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6996 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133843021 for additional context. This fully reverts the following changesets (modulo conflicts, resolved the best I could manage):

133764272
133769742
133769753
133770747
133771176
133773178
133773312
133808351
133823358
133842970
133843021
133843030
133843123
133843171
133843251
jtracey (2023-04-02 17:09:02+00:00): I should mention here too, this is only the edits around Waterloo/Guelph. If you'd like me to revert similar changesets in other areas for you, just let me know.
streckenkundler (2023-04-07 20:56:32+00:00): Sollte revertet werden, da Vandalismus-Verdacht im Raum steht! Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/134398403
Bobbi123 (2023-04-07 21:30:32+00:00): Muss ich entschieden zurückweisen, da die Löschungen gemäß der Kriterien im Wiki für abgebrochene Bahnstrecke geschah bzw. diese für die gelöschten Gleise nicht ausreichen. Begründung dazu siehe auch: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/134398403#map=11/49.5733/9.9859

Ich muss drauf hinweisen, dass mich der User in diesem Chanceset persönlich beleidigt, abgewertet und ad hominem angewendet hat, als die Sachebene verlassen hat. Diese Emotionalität war hier keinesfalls legitim.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-06 10:59:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134571999 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed mechanica edits, including those referred to at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7024 and some others.  See also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/currently-ongoing-automated-edit-for-service-vehicle/97737 .
MxxCon (2023-04-06 04:26:20+00:00): Vandalism reverted.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134423061
streckenkundler (2023-04-07 20:56:20+00:00): Sollte revertet werden, da Vandalismus-Verdacht im Raum steht! Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/134398403
Bobbi123 (2023-04-07 21:30:26+00:00): Muss ich entschieden zurückweisen, da die Löschungen gemäß der Kriterien im Wiki für abgebrochene Bahnstrecke geschah bzw. diese für die gelöschten Gleise nicht ausreichen. Begründung dazu siehe auch: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/134398403#map=11/49.5733/9.9859

Ich muss drauf hinweisen, dass mich der User in diesem Chanceset persönlich beleidigt, abgewertet und ad hominem angewendet hat, als die Sachebene verlassen hat. Diese Emotionalität war hier keinesfalls legitim.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-06 10:58:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134571999 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed mechanica edits, including those referred to at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7024 and some others.  See also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/currently-ongoing-automated-edit-for-service-vehicle/97737 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-06 11:02:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134571999 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed mechanica edits, including those referred to at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7024 and some others.  See also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/currently-ongoing-automated-edit-for-service-vehicle/97737 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-06 11:00:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134571999 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed mechanica edits, including those referred to at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7024 and some others.  See also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/currently-ongoing-automated-edit-for-service-vehicle/97737 .
ualios (2023-04-22 17:58:24+00:00): Ciao, ma hai qualche problema con le rotatorie, vista la tua ostinazione nel taggarle al contrario? Non ricordo più quante te ne ho corrette con il tag errato "clockwise" ma la cronologia di questa è emblematica:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/331315030
Ciao, ma hai qualche problema con le rotatorie, vista la tua ostinazione nel taggarle al contrario? Non ricordo più quante te ne ho corrette con il tag errato "clockwise" ma la cronologia di questa è emblematica:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/331315030
Inizialmente mappata bene, senza necessità di specificare la direzione perchè è "anticlockwise" di default, poi arrivi tu con "clockwise" errato, io correggo, di nuovo tu con "clockwise", un altro spera di essere più chiaro taggando "anticlockwise" e tu di nuovo, appena pochi gg fa, ancora con "clockwise". Ma ti sfugge qualcosa oppure dobbiamo pensare che è vandalismo?
user_1566574 (2023-04-14 21:34:23+00:00): ??!!
Pardon je risque de m'énerver, mais j'ai vraiment besoin de comprendre les modifications comme celles apportées ici : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/363872778/history

Car ça s'apparente à une forme subtile de vandalisme. Merci d'avance.
user_1566574 (2023-04-21 13:52:24+00:00): Note : La conversation continue en message privé, sur un ton désormais plus apaisé. Il semble y avoir un décalage entre ce qu'indique le terrain, et les sources BANO/FANTOIR/l'historique, l'on va tenter de clarifier la situation.
danieldegroot2 (2023-04-02 17:32:54+00:00): *Wikimedia Commons for reference
b-unicycling (2023-04-07 17:49:07+00:00): I didn't map this before, because I don't think it's an original MKS, just built as a memorial. They were usually not in use that close to the creamery, apart from the ramp/ platform belonging to the creamery building.
danieldegroot2 (2023-04-08 20:43:48+00:00): I assume it was built as memorial. Victor might know a good way to tag the physical and commemorated subjects independently here. Since I have a moment, I'll send them a PM.

Regards,

Daniel
danieldegroot2 (2023-04-08 20:50:26+00:00): Nvm, I've changed my mind, let's keep to description only.
b-unicycling (2023-04-09 08:54:31+00:00): Maybe we need to define them as a subcategory of memorials. There seem to be quite a few built in Germany as well, just as memorials, judging from newspaper articles and local history websites I found. memorial=milk_churn_stand maybe.
silversurfer83 (2023-04-03 08:17:08+00:00): Gude :)

ist das man_made=wastewater_plant and den Wasserbecken (Bsp https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1159212804) nicht zuviel? Der tag ist doch schon an der umgebenden Fläche dran.

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134423771
RicoElectrico (2023-04-03 12:12:52+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3373302682/history - te słupki wciąż istnieją, tyle że bez oznaczenia kilometrażu? Bo tak bym to interpretował, ale nie wiem jak wygląda to w terenie.
Szymson (2023-04-03 13:31:24+00:00): Na pewno będą przesunięte. Stary przebieg DK6 ma być włączony do DW468. Początek drogi wojewódzkiej będzie albo w Bożympolu albo w Strzebielinie. Na razie trzeba czekać na zarządzenie GDDKiA w tej sprawie. Póki co usunąłem stary kilometraż dla DK6, bo ta droga nie jest już krajową.
user_12523467 (2023-04-02 21:48:19+00:00): can you explain why did you detected these building parts?
user_12523467 (2023-04-02 21:49:01+00:00): *deleted
LockOnGuy (2023-04-02 22:07:03+00:00): @Lamassu this is vandalism, I tried to communicate with him yesterday see: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/134365684 and explained it to him but that did not help, I will report him and revert his vandal.
LockOnGuy (2023-04-02 22:12:43+00:00): This vandal changeset has been reverted fully in changeset 134431146.
Shaun das Schaf (2023-04-02 21:22:44+00:00): Hallo furgas,

die Straße war vorher eigentlich genau richtig eingetragen als Zufahrtsweg (highway=service), das sagt nichts über die Befahrbarkeit oder Nichtbefahrbarkeit aus.

Eine (Orts)verbindungsstraße (highway=tertiary) so wie jetzt eingetragen ist es aber sicher nicht.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dservice
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dtertiary

Bitte wieder korrigieren.

Viele Grüße
Shaun das Schaf
Shaun das Schaf (2023-04-12 08:41:29+00:00): Hallo, ich habe die Straße wieder auf highway=service zurückgeändert.

Viele Grüße
Shaun das Schaf
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-04-02 17:45:08+00:00): the mistake was fixed in the next changeset.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-06 11:02:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134571999 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed mechanica edits, including those referred to at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7024 and some others.  See also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/currently-ongoing-automated-edit-for-service-vehicle/97737 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-06 10:59:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134571999 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed mechanica edits, including those referred to at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7024 and some others.  See also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/currently-ongoing-automated-edit-for-service-vehicle/97737 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-06 11:00:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134571999 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed mechanica edits, including those referred to at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7024 and some others.  See also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/currently-ongoing-automated-edit-for-service-vehicle/97737 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-06 11:00:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134571999 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed mechanica edits, including those referred to at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7024 and some others.  See also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/currently-ongoing-automated-edit-for-service-vehicle/97737 .
emersonveenstra (2023-04-05 10:39:59+00:00): Hi,

On https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10780155026, was id=14 supposed to be ref=14?
treestryder (2023-04-05 23:55:52+00:00): Yes it was. Thanks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-06 11:01:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134571999 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed mechanica edits, including those referred to at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7024 and some others.  See also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/currently-ongoing-automated-edit-for-service-vehicle/97737 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-06 11:01:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134571999 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed mechanica edits, including those referred to at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7024 and some others.  See also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/currently-ongoing-automated-edit-for-service-vehicle/97737 .
silversurfer83 (2023-04-03 08:19:20+00:00): Moin Don,

warum entfernst du die Zugangserlaubnis für LangLKW?

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134424214
user_18478180 (2023-04-03 13:22:35+00:00): Weil es dort OTG keinerlei Hinweise dazu gibt.
silversurfer83 (2023-04-03 13:52:11+00:00): Ok. Deine Quelle und dein Kommentar geben das halt nicht her, daher hab ich gefragt.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-06 11:01:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134571999 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed mechanica edits, including those referred to at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7024 and some others.  See also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/currently-ongoing-automated-edit-for-service-vehicle/97737 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-06 11:00:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134571999 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed mechanica edits, including those referred to at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7024 and some others.  See also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/currently-ongoing-automated-edit-for-service-vehicle/97737 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-06 11:01:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134571999 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed mechanica edits, including those referred to at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7024 and some others.  See also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/currently-ongoing-automated-edit-for-service-vehicle/97737 .