piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Lostmonkey (2026-05-16 06:20:20+00:00): Hvad viser dette punkt? Det har ingen tags udover et navn. Er der et fysisk objekt på stedet? Hvis det blot er et mødested, bryder det formentlig med OSM's "on the ground"-princip. Tilbagevendende møder/arrangementer kortlægges desuden normalt ikke i OSM, medmindre de involverer fysiske objekter der optræder på samme sted med et forudsigeligt interval – som fx en markedsbod eller en sæsonåben kiosk.
b-holdet (2026-05-16 11:38:35+00:00): Lader til at det er et mødested for Blotgilde

https://www.blotgilde.dk/
bocaj52 (2026-05-17 21:34:41+00:00): Jeg tilføjede punktet efter at det blev refereret til som et møde sted i privat regi. Har søgt lidt rundt. Det er korrekt at Blotgilde.dk er angivet på Google Maps (sandsynligvis punkt sat af dem selv.)
Naturstyrelsen har ingen angivelse på deres offentlige kort, hvorfor jeg mener punktet bør slettet igen (gør jeg her efter)
Yunkers (2026-04-06 11:34:02+00:00): Który to już raz trzeba było poprawiać ten łącznik? :D
Dawid2849 (2026-04-06 19:24:16+00:00): Nie wiem, na pewno za każdym razem gdy entropia grzebie coś w Częstochowie to muszę przywracać tu link 🙃
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:00:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:10:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
Rizky Prawinto (2026-06-03 03:55:25+00:00): New Housing Development
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:11:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
melbournefan (2026-04-07 11:03:55+00:00): Line has been razed for years, there are no visible elements of the track left except on the Lygon St side of the element, which can remain
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180893015
MappingMore (2026-04-07 06:28:39+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:180980378
rajdhani (2026-04-06 07:09:33+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:180927468
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 08:59:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
kingkingHK (2026-04-06 12:51:02+00:00): FYI I have changed https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13707950616 to `tourism=information` + `information=board` + `board_type=welcome_sign` and the text to `name=`.

P.S. the new border your drew in this changeset seems wrong, but the law is copyrighted so I don't know what I can do about this.
vectorial8192 (2026-04-06 15:34:15+00:00): re node change, I will trust your changeset. Ultimately this kind of "welcome to district" signs seems ambiguous as to their nature; I struggle to classify them between artistic sculpture or a highway sign.

But interesting mention about the law, I was not aware there is a law for district borders and I just place the border at where the sign/sculpture is at. We can elaborate on this on eg Discord so we can figure out what's up.
Kovoschiz (2026-04-06 16:29:51+00:00): 1. Please don't change the border based on signs alone. They aren't exact markers. There are other considerations. 
2. This is not `=city_limit` , and it should not be used in HK. It means a road sign with legal effects.
Kovoschiz (2026-04-06 16:37:16+00:00): @kingkingHK It can be seen as wrong originally, as it seems to follow Tai Po Rd. The line isn't.
kingkingHK (2026-04-07 05:49:11+00:00): @vectorial8192 2. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:board_type%3Dwelcome_sign

> Use the traffic sign scheme (`traffic_sign=city_limit` or the equivalent local code) when the "welcome" sign is part of the local traffic sign standard or resembles other traffic signs. Besides any greeting, the sign has a more important function of informing the public about the location of the boundary, which may imply changes in traffic laws.
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 08:58:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:12:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
VLD0251 (2026-04-07 12:19:24+00:00): You have made over 5,000 edits without providing any edit summaries or sources!
 قمت بإجراء أكثر من 5000 تعديل دون تقديم أي تعليق أو مصدر
VLD0251 (2026-04-07 12:19:15+00:00): You have made over 5,000 edits without providing any edit summaries or sources!
 قمت بإجراء أكثر من 5000 تعديل دون تقديم أي تعليق أو مصدر
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:02:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
aTarom (2026-04-27 08:25:30+00:00): Hola, quan puguis revisa aquest número de telèfon que no sembla correcte. 
"+34022884927"
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13708116401
Salutacions
Dawid2849 (2026-04-05 13:27:09+00:00): Dzięki!
MaliMrav (2026-04-06 07:03:39+00:00): Zdravo MarcoLovesMaps2,

Dobrodošao u OSM zajednicu.

Da li ti je potrebna neka pomoć? Ukoliko želiš da kontaktiraš sa drugim maperima u Srbiji to možeš da uradiš putem Telegrama (kanal osm_sr, https://t.me/osm_sr) ili foruma (https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/rs/64). Tu možeš da pitaš sve u vezi mapiranja.

Samo sam hteo da proverim da li je Kasarna „Zvezda” zvanično ime ili nije?

Na sajtu Vojske Srbije nalazim da je ime „General Pavle Jurišić Šturm”.

https://www.vs.rs/sr_lat/jedinice/vojska-srbije/komanda-za-obuku/centar-za-obuku-kov

Molim te da javiš gde si našao ovo novo ime.

Srećno mapiranje!

Pozdrav,
MaliMrav
Wildsharky (2026-04-07 03:51:07+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:180928553
VLD0251 (2026-04-07 12:19:02+00:00): You have made over 5,000 edits without providing any edit summaries or sources!
 قمت بإجراء أكثر من 5000 تعديل دون تقديم أي تعليق أو مصدر
VLD0251 (2026-04-07 12:18:51+00:00): You have made over 5,000 edits without providing any edit summaries or sources!
 قمت بإجراء أكثر من 5000 تعديل دون تقديم أي تعليق أو مصدر
VLD0251 (2026-04-07 12:18:41+00:00): You have made over 5,000 edits without providing any edit summaries or sources!
 قمت بإجراء أكثر من 5000 تعديل دون تقديم أي تعليق أو مصدر
VLD0251 (2026-04-07 12:18:29+00:00): You have made over 5,000 edits without providing any edit summaries or sources!
 قمت بإجراء أكثر من 5000 تعديل دون تقديم أي تعليق أو مصدر
iandees (2026-04-05 13:03:06+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1225308141 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180896523, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
eggie (2026-04-05 13:20:35+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback Wat bedoel met permanent gesloten?

Wat is je bron in deze. 
De fietsroutes zijn nu niet meer in orde.
Je kunt helaas geen routerelaties bewerken met editor iD. Dat kan alleen met editor JOSM en de nodige ervaring.
Ook heb je zo te zien de highway tag verwijderd.




MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-04-05 13:37:36+00:00): Reverted by changeset #180897761 

John .. Ik heb je aanpassing teruggedraaid. De routerelatie is daarmee weer hersteld. 
iD kan niet omgaan met de routedelen. 
Wanneer iets tijdelijk is afgesloten sluieten we geen routes af. We zitten anders met een gemankeerde kaart.
Zodra de bruggetjes er weer inliggen gaat de route weer open.
Mocht 40-47 permanent gesloten worden dan moeten we het anders oplossen. Dan zullen de knooppunten ook ergens anders komen.
Er zal nog wel meer veranderen daar. Het zijn tijdelijke situaties. Waar de oorspronkelijke route liep kun je nu niet meer komen.
De bruggetjessituatie is tijdelijk. 
Momenteel is ben bezig de bruggetjes te vervangen.
Weet jij de termijn van het inleggen van de nieuwe bruggen? 
Een editor waar je wel routerelaties kunt bewerken is JOSM.

editor josm stap voor stap
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/editor-josm-stap-voor-stap/75047



MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-04-05 14:16:35+00:00): De route heb ik weer teruggelegd met josm zoals jij bedoelde. Het zal nog wel een poos duren als dat bouwverkeer ook over dat traject gaat.
Zodra duidelijk is als het G13 fietspad weer opengesteld wordt kijk ik wel even naar de knooppuntfietsroutebordjes wat de bedoeling is en leg de route weer terug.
Volgens mijn berichten kan het tot medio 2027 duren en ik heb de afgesloten paden  op construction gezet.
CTRL-F5 voor het effect.
MVG
eggie
John Stam (2026-04-05 16:22:00+00:00): Beste eggie, ik zie dat je je na een eerste reactie wat verder in de situatie verdiept hebt. Dit is idd geen kortdurende wijziging. Volgens de informatie van de gemeente zal de afsluiting in ieder geval 2 jaar duren, maar ik vermoed dat de oude route niet meer terug zal komen door nieuwbouw van huizen. 
Wat moet er nu op korte termijn met de bordjes ter plekke gebeuren? Want voor een vreemde is de situatie totaal onduidelijk. 
Mvg, John
eggie (2026-04-05 17:00:59+00:00): Hoi John,
Dat die route is omgeleid had ik overigens geen moeite mee, want toen het park werd gerenoveerd heb ik al eerder de verschillende routes omgeleid.
Dat de boel daar was afgesloten wist ik wel, maar de consensus is dat we voor een korte periode niets afsluiten. Duurt het langer dan zeg maar drie maanden dan taggen we iets met conditionaltagging.
Dan opent na einddatum het pad weer vanzelf.
Voorbeeld.. access:conditional=no @ (2025 Sep 20-2026 Apr 03)

Gaat iets vele maanden tot meer dan een jaar duren of komt het anders terug  dan zetten we de wegen niet op access=no, maar op highway=construction met construction= cycleway en/of path
Dat heb ik hier gedaan.
Zat al eerder te twijfelen, maar had de hoop dat het spoedig weer opengesteld zou worden. De fundering voor het nieuwe bruggetje is al klaar. 
Er komen daar immers geen woningen.
Die route liep inderdaad over dat gebied van die bouwactiviteiten. er staat daar zelfs nog een knooppuntbord richting kp 47 en wijzend de verkeerde kant uit. Het
Die wandelroute die over dat afgesloten stuk loopt laat ik even zo. Daar is geen alternatief voor.

Routebordjes worden door verschillende instanties onderhouden. De Provincie besteed dat dan weer uit aan een routebureau. 
https://www.meldpuntroutes.nl/

Volgens mij heeft het geen zin om nu een melding te doen. Maar even afwachten en in de gaten houden. 

Waar het mij nu even om ging is om je te tippen dat je niet met editor iD aan routerelaties gaat 'zitten'. 
Zodra je gaat knippen in routes zijn alle routes stuk. In iD zie je dat niet. 
De route-expert zien dat direct en krijgen dan een seintje via https://knooppuntnet.nl/en/
Kijk maar eens bij analyse , changes.
Daar kom je je eigen aanpassing tegen en wat ik daar van heb hersteld. 

MVG en mapse,
eggie
HellMap (2026-04-05 18:43:15+00:00): Hi,

A small note - addresses like https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9819743227 should not be deleted (or changed) - they are automatically daily imported by a bot and are correct (at least, as far as official data is concerned).
maicolgalante (2026-04-06 07:50:46+00:00): The trail is a path, passable, and if it's not always visible, just change the visibility value. I'll restore it!
Fraxi (2026-04-05 14:14:16+00:00): Значи, аз като ги гледам кръгчетата в МЛЗ на https://d2ftgf10aqtt1f.cloudfront.net/8-1775205076-%D0%90801-%D0%BF%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%B4%D0%BD%D0%BE-page-001.jpg и мисля, че локациите са на места, където и преди е имало такива табели.  Видях, че на някои си им сменил ref номерата. Даже мисля, че видях и табела на Иван Кирков близо до точката, където си сложил, от източната страна на улицата.
Fraxi (2026-04-05 14:18:17+00:00): Тоест на Боян Петров...
Fraxi (2026-04-05 14:20:18+00:00): Виж например бележка https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5211265#map=18/42.659735/23.292882. Защото не знам как да възстановя историята иначе. Но най-сигурно е наистина на място да се обходят.
pyrog (2026-04-07 12:26:39+00:00): Salut,

StreetComplete "désactive" le tag amenity=drinking_water en lui ajoutant le préfixe disused:

Le problème c'est que la fontaine est toujours là sur le terrain, mais elle disparait complètement de la majorité des applis OSM.

Si l'eau ne coule pas le problème est peut-être temporaire ?
Est-ce qu'il y avait un message dessus ?

__
Yves
rajdhani (2026-04-06 08:42:12+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:180931332
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:08:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
MaelFr (2026-04-22 19:32:52+00:00): Bonjour,
Pour indiquer un chaussidou, tu peux te référer à la réf L3 de la page FR:Bicycle du wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bicycle
Et, je ne connais pas la rue, mais j'ai un doute sur le foot=no.
MaelFr (2026-04-22 19:33:57+00:00): Hum, mauvais changeset
dibi_ca (2026-04-05 14:26:59+00:00): #PCTOMarconi2026
MaelFr (2026-04-22 19:34:34+00:00): Bonjour,
Pour indiquer un chaussidou, tu peux te référer à la réf L3 de la page FR:Bicycle du wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bicycle
Et, je ne connais pas la rue, mais j'ai un doute sur le foot=no
eggie (2026-04-05 18:52:21+00:00): Dag Frank Hier is iets niet helemaal goed gegaan. Een deel van je oprit zit als duplicated way geplakt op de Keppelse weg.
Er is daar een soort middenberm. Kun je die berm hier dooorsteken met een voertuig>
De duplicated ways zal ik verwijderen.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-04-05 18:57:41+00:00): Is dit wel een in- of uitrit voor regulier verkeer? Mag je links af?.. Graag reactie
FrankDoet (2026-04-05 20:55:32+00:00): Dit is een verlengde van de Maria Montessoristraat naar de Keppelseweg. Je kan daar inderdaad alleen rechtsaf vanwege de middenberm en is niet voor voetgangers of fietser. Ik dacht dat ik dat aangegeven had maar blijkbaar niet.

 

Sorry
eggie (2026-04-06 05:16:56+00:00): Dag Frank,
Straks zal ik het wel even aanpassen met afslagbeperkingen. Komt goed.
Bedankt voor je reactie.
Mvg,
eggie
Allroads (2026-04-05 17:30:17+00:00): Thanks, I changed it, to hazard=parked_cars, highway was wrong, slip of ... keys , in front of the path mostly there are cars parked on the link, often you can not walk ride straight to the carriageway. 

Greetings Allroads.
cswilson252 (2026-04-22 00:37:49+00:00): Abandoned railways that no longer exist on the ground should be mapped in OHM instead.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181649945
MappingMore (2026-04-08 04:58:36+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:181029449
tguen (2026-04-07 02:55:08+00:00): "Gift Shop=yes" is not a valid tag

if you don't know how to map something, ask on the forum

https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/help-and-support/7/none
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180902489
tguen (2026-04-07 02:53:13+00:00): you left the phone number, cuisine and opening hours
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180902524
taunode (2026-04-05 16:24:07+00:00): Na ja, da könnte man sich jetzt drüber streiten.
Das Wiki sieht aber mMn eindeutig vor, Capacity!=Bügel

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dbicycle_parking
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:09:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
tguen (2026-04-07 02:51:45+00:00): you left the bank's website on the gym
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180903118
NeisBot (2026-04-05 15:26:26+00:00): 🌍 Bienvenue sur OSM, Larcuss0621.
Merci de contribuer !

Pour faciliter la collaboration et aider les autres à comprendre tes modifications, il est préférable d'ajouter une courte description des changements que tu as effectués. Des commentaires clairs aident la communauté à suivre ton travail et à fournir des retours plus précis. Tu peux trouver des conseils pour écrire de bons commentaires ici[1].

✅ Voici un exemple de commentaire basé sur tes modifications de carte : "Mise à jour des attributs de route, remplacement d'une voie tertiaire par une résidentielle, et changement de surface en asphalte"
(Auto-translation)
---
🌍 Welcome to OSM, Larcuss0621.
Thanks for contributing!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

✅ Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Updated road attributes, replacing tertiary highway with residential, and changed surface to asphalt"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:06:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-15 09:12:27+00:00): Reverted adding SEO POI with blatent advertising and nonsense tags, possibly sourced from Google Map, sin changeset 184127020

https://osm.org/changeset/184127020

https://osm.org/changeset/184127020
felipeeugenio (2026-04-05 16:13:14+00:00): Hola. Dibujamos las estructuras de manera individual de acuerdo a su base. No hacemos agrupaciones de edificicaciones a modo esquemático. Su otra edición parece más detallada, esta agrupa estructuras distintas bajo un mismo polígono.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180904151
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:06:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
Fraxi (2026-04-05 17:00:10+00:00): Как https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1199513443 ще е 9-етажна, бе човек :D? Съседната, новата, може би е толкова. А това е къща и там преди май имаше някакво заведение.
Fraxi (2026-04-05 17:00:52+00:00): Имах предвид https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/174749197
Boyan Alexiev (2026-04-05 22:03:14+00:00): Да, прав си. Това е къщата със зелената ограда до спирката. Сь броих етажите на новопостроения блок, но обърках обекта.  Благодаря за ОТК-то 🤝
NeisBot (2026-04-05 15:57:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13708592688 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Carpet cleaning service"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-13 16:33:07+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181284548
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
ajmat (2026-04-07 04:48:21+00:00): Reverted in changeset id: 180977867
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-05 16:21:26+00:00): Hallo Karlheinz Gierling, willkommen bei OSM.

Die zuletzt eingetragenen bzw. hinzugefügten deutschen Straßennamen machen mich neugierig. Sind diese auf den Schildern Vorort zu sehen oder was ist die Quelle von den ganzen Namen?

Danke und viele Grüße
Karlheinz Gierling (2026-04-05 17:11:42+00:00): Hallo, schön, dass jemand gleich auf meine ersten Bearbeitungen reagiert. Es handelt sich um die alten, deutschprachigen Strassennamen in einer siebenbürgischen Stadt. In diesem Fall ist es meine Heimatstadt und ich kenne die Namen.  Die offiziellen Straßennamen wurden immer wieder geändert. In einigen Städten nennen die Strassenschilder die historischen Namen. Hier ein Bsp https://adz.news/lokales/artikel-lokales/artikel/alte-kronstaedter-strassennamen-in-erinnerung-gebracht. Quellen gibt es natürlich auch. Hier zBsp https://scontent-ber1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t39.30808-6/663230254_745996875263839_7113235112219086130_n.jpg?_nc_cat=110&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=e06c5d&_nc_ohc=LzE-KGNhKJcQ7kNvwGZMpl6&_nc_oc=Adq-xSlz0NRZCXMRxKLmKZ1jxiekpzKcoKeVN9IGbhM5r0g4KsT2BcNrs0u-mh6veZo&_nc_zt=23&_nc_ht=scontent-ber1-1.xx&_nc_gid=Pla3bJpXNkTYY4D-zG1aaw&_nc_ss=7a3a8&oh=00_Af02Lq6Yxxi27mvbCfpD99wSerdNS0H7xJs_vFzfnDZ9SA&oe=69D87642
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-05 17:15:55+00:00): 👍 Vielen Dank für die Antwort.

#HappyMapping
SomeoneElse (2026-04-16 13:34:10+00:00): Nothing will find https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9238774996 .  You have not told OSM what it is.
Also wikipedia is not a valid source for OSM because its licence is not compatible.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-04-24 12:01:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 181761661 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious changes in Somali, Ethiopia.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20179
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:01:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
Szymson (2026-04-05 16:36:13+00:00): Błędnie. http://gdansk.pzd.pl/nasze-ogrody/218-rod-nad-orania
MappingMore (2026-04-07 04:19:40+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:180977166
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:11:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
Wildsharky (2026-04-07 03:50:15+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:180924830
Gicorada (2026-04-06 07:26:34+00:00): Buongiorno. Ho notato quest'aggiunta, sarebbe forse più indicato aggiungere alcuni di questi tag alla way 131965439 (l'edificio dentro a cui è stato posizionato il punto) invece che a questo nuovo punto?
Inoltre, addr:street deve contenere solamente il nome della via (senza ulteriori indicazioni), e generalmente il tag operator:type dovrebbe contenere uno dei valori più "standard" consigliati a https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:operator:type .
In ogni caso, grazie per il contributo!