piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
stasiu512 (2026-04-20 20:13:49+00:00): Cześć, zastanawiam się czy w tym przypadku nie byłoby lepiej użyć po prostu głównego tagu name=Cristal? Według oficjalnej wiki -https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:housename ten tag służy do oznaczania nazwy, gdy jest ona częścią oficjalnego adresu pocztowego (co jest popularne np. w UK). Z kolei sam budynek to pawilon, którego właściciel po przebudowie oficjalnie zachował nazwę Cristal (jest na szyldach), więc moim zdaniem idealnie pasuje to pod zwykłe name. Wydaje mi się też, że aplikacje takie jak OsmAnd łatwiej wyszukałyby ten obiekt właśnie po tagu name:)
czebureks (2026-04-21 11:01:52+00:00): Cześć, myślę, że możesz mieć rację w przypadku Cristala. Szczególnie ten "branding" przez szyld mnie przekonuje, że jest to aktualnie używana nazwa budynku. Natomiast pozostawiłbym "addr:housename=*" np. dla historycznych willi w Górnym Wrzeszczu czy Sopocie.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:47:31+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401268
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:47:24+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401262
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:47:17+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401258
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:47:11+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401254
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:47:05+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401252
Fizzie-DWG (2025-03-21 04:27:55+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17427
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:47:00+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401249
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:46:53+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401248
Udarian (2025-03-20 01:54:57+00:00): I have two questions here, first what does "amenity=toilets + wetland=mangrove" even mean in this context, is it a restroom or a tree, the second question is the "natural=wetland + represent a single tree or meany trees in an area. 

Happy mapping,
Udar.
aphugstudent (2025-03-20 03:08:42+00:00): Good evening Udar,

For the amenity=toilets + wetland=mangrove, it must have been a typo/misclick that I made when I was mapping the other features. I will make sure to fix that ASAP. As for the natural=wetland, that represents a group of mangroves by that coastline immediately north of the Brickell Key Bridge. The final modification made was a public restroom immediately north of 8th Street in the Brickell Underline. Thanks for your help!

Sincerely,
aphugstudent
woodpeck_repair (2025-04-15 06:32:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 164967840 where the changeset comment is: revert edits after no reaction in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163821108, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163807554
OddlyAngled (2025-04-01 20:08:34+00:00): Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dtrail_riding_station for some guidance on how to use this tag - it shouldn't go on trails or roads. Welcome to OSM!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163798763
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:46:47+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401245
Glassman (2025-03-20 02:25:00+00:00): #TIP: We normally add the fuel info to the roof over the pumps instead of the convenience store. Can you review this edit? I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163799416
EWA_J-BOMS (2025-03-20 02:33:54+00:00): Sounds good! I updated it so the fuel types are on the roof instead of the convenience store. Thanks!
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:46:41+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401242
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:44:58+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401185
NeisBot (2025-03-19 04:45:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was flagged because your added description contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment
NeisReview (2025-03-28 19:35:11+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/164223367
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:44:53+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401180
NeisBot (2025-03-19 04:54:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was flagged because your added description contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2025-03-28 19:37:03+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/164223430
Zunyu (2025-04-12 08:32:32+00:00): どうもこんにちは
質問なんですが多言語のケチュワ語とかスワヒリ語とかこの地域には必要だと思ったってことでしょうか？翻訳機やAIに聞けばいくらでも追加できると思いますが英語くらいに留めて他は必要ないと思いますしネイティブではないのでそもそも合ってるのか間違えてるのか確認できないと思いますし文書化されていないname:en1を使うよりもalt_name:enの方が一般的だと思います。またエリア化してたものからノードに抜き取る操作もまた必要ないと私は思いますがいかがでしょうか？最後に住所の町字を○丁目にしているようですが日本各地に置かれてる大字・町字に合わせるのが一般的だと思います
pseek (2025-04-13 04:02:51+00:00): コメントありがとうございます。

多言語の件についてはご指摘のとおり、思い至らない点がありました。
現在、自身で把捉できる4言語にとどめておりますが、過去入力分については補遺の際などに削除を検討します。
alt_name:enの使用/切り替えについても検討いたします。教示ありがとうございます。

ノードへの抜き取りの件については、エリア化した状態であると情報を「探しづらい」ことからこの操作を選択しておりました。

>大字・町字に合わせるのが一般的
というのはどのようなことでしょうか。お教えいただければ幸いです。
Zunyu (2025-04-13 07:38:57+00:00): 簡単に言えば町字のところが○丁目から△△○丁目になります（○には漢数字）。
具体的に言えば、
仙台南郵便局(https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4473109729)の場合、
長町七丁目という町字（https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8524256366）に合わせ
町字（addr:neighbourhood）　7丁目
↓
町字（addr:neighbourhood）　長町七丁目

大字（addr:quarter）　長町
↓
空欄
に修正する必要があります

他の地域も
富山駅前郵便局（https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3708217738）の場合、
新富町一丁目という町字（https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7996396196）に合わせ
町字　1丁目
↓
町字　新富町一丁目

大字　新富町
↓
空欄
と同様の修正が必要になります。

このことは、wikiの
>大字が八幡、小字が一丁目であると解釈するのは誤りです。
小字は今のiDで町字と書いてあるところになります。
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Japan_tagging#%E4%B8%81%E7%9B%AE%E3%82%92%E5%90%AB%E3%82%80%E5%9C%B0%E5%90%8D
とか、千葉県の例
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:%E4%BD%8F%E6%89%80#%E8%A1%97%E5%8C%BA_Block_number_address_system%E3%81%AB%E3%81%A4%E3%81%84%E3%81%A6
見てもらえればと思います。
特殊な場所もありその場合は
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1aOnXzGhZ8DYn0rSUXbT2C0JACesqfJbdpqiz2Jty8n0/edit?gid=0#gid=0
になり、分かってくると他の人の間違いにも気づくと思います。
pseek (2025-04-14 01:45:42+00:00): 分かりやすくご説明いただき、ありがとうございます。
理解が足りていない部分がありました。さらなる理解、習熟につとめます。
NeisBot (2025-03-19 05:24:46+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was flagged because your added description contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment
NeisReview (2025-03-28 19:38:03+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/164223476
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-19 05:55:04+00:00): see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126318271
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-06 04:30:47+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164574320
NeisReview (2025-03-19 17:30:18+00:00): #NameCheck

Hello and welcome to OSM.

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits, particularly those concerning the names you've added or modified.

Some of these names caught my attention as they are quite unique or a bit unusual. Could you please confirm if these additions were intentional or if they might have been added mistakenly?

Looking forward to your response.

Thank you!
NeisBot (2025-03-19 06:22:07+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was flagged because your added description contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2025-03-28 19:39:16+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163807362
nevw (2025-04-26 12:11:58+00:00): Hi, this relation seems to have lost the it's outer and only has inners left.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6368238#map=15/-0.45987/132.32266&layers=D
The problem appears to be that you deleted all the outer boundaries.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=163802547
Was this intentional?
rblldnk (2025-04-29 05:00:33+00:00): Hi Wahyu,
Apakah menambahkan house number harus menghapus relation?
nevw (2025-04-29 05:34:19+00:00): No, I will recover all the deleted boundaries in the next few days.
nevw (2025-04-29 07:29:34+00:00): I decided not to revert these areas because I don't understand the full extent of the changes and why they were made
Wahyul_Kontur (2025-04-29 07:31:18+00:00): Hi ratu, 
Mohon maaf saya tidak sengaja menghapusnya. Saat itu saya sedang mengedit penggunaan lahan area tersebut, dan terdapat peringatan saat validasi. Kedepan saya akan berhati hati menghapus sesuatu. 

Salam
Wahyu
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-17 00:01:24+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165049590
osmmapper222 (2025-03-24 14:34:54+00:00): Ist der Umriss des Gewerbegebiets Lister Damm offiziel definiert?

Es umfasst auch einen Aldi (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/144312443), wo eher landuse=commercial passen würde.

Weider südlich gibt es auch noch eine neue TÜV Station (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12696720165), die ggf. in das Gewerbegebiet aufgenommen werden könnte.
osmmapper222 (2025-03-24 16:04:24+00:00): Nachtrag: für den Aldi meine ich landuse=retail, nicht landuse=commercial
Nadjita (2025-03-24 16:32:52+00:00): Das weiß ich nicht, ich habe nur den Bereich um die Schule herum präzisiert, wo er durch Zäune klar abgegrenzt ist. Zum Rest kann ich nichts sagen.
pitfire (2025-03-19 09:44:14+00:00): Hi Senor S,
the entry opening_hours is not system compatible.

Webseite sagt:
Mo-Fr 09:00-12:00; Tu,We 15:00-17:30

Gruß pitfire
Senor S (2025-03-19 10:26:13+00:00): Hallo,
ich verstehe nicht. Im Netz steht Montag bis Freitag von 9.00 - 12.00 Uhr, dienstags und mittwochs zusätzlich von 15.00 - 17.30 Uhr.
pitfire (2025-03-19 11:06:47+00:00): Hab es korrigiert.

Das Tool kann da gut helfen:

https://projets.pavie.info/yohours/?oh=Mo-Fr%2009:00-12:00;%20Tu,We%2009:00-12:00,15:00-17:30;%20PH%20off

Gruß
mavl (2025-03-19 15:22:42+00:00): Здравствуйте. Подскажите, пожалуйста, почему название "Интернациональная улица" было заменено на "улица Интернациональная"?
desk77 (2025-03-20 05:44:59+00:00): Приношу извинения, название улицы было изменено по ошибке.
mavl (2025-03-20 06:32:48+00:00): Ничего страшного.
Robin van der Linde (2025-03-20 16:18:16+00:00): Ik snap dat het dubbel taggen van adressen niet de beste oplossing is, maar om gewoon alle wijzigingen terug te draaien en daarmee ook bijvoorbeeld de Big Bazar weer terug op de kaart te zetten vind ik een beetje bot
Tjuro (2025-03-20 19:10:32+00:00): Beste Robin,

Excuus voor mijn gebrek aan communicatie.

De reden dat ik deze wijzigingen heb teruggedraaid is omdat dit de verbeteringen van A73-A73 grotendeels ongedaan had gemaakt.

Het plaatsen van poi’s op ways met gekopieerde adressen is niet fout, het probleem hier is dat je deze info kopieert naar de indoor mapping objecten.

Vergelijkbaar met het plaatsen van een poi op een gebouw voldoe je hiermee niet aan one feature one element,
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element 

De kwaliteit van poi’s in Nederland is iets waar ik en anderen zoals A73-A73 mee bezig zijn om dit naar een hoger niveau te tillen, als onderdeel daarvan is dus het splitsen van de verschillende features en strak aan one feature one element houden.

Ik stel voor dat je poi’s plaatst op adressen of op los ingetekende ways met de gekopieerde adresgegevens.

Met vriendelijke groet,

Tjuro
Robin van der Linde (2025-03-20 21:14:46+00:00): Dank voor je antwoord, zal zo even er verder naar kijken. (+ nog wat details opschonen/toevoegen)

Happy mapping en vriendelijke groet,
Robin
pitscheplatsch (2025-03-19 17:29:43+00:00): #NameCheck

Hello and welcome to OSM.

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits, particularly those concerning the names you've added or modified.

Some of these names caught my attention as they are quite unique or a bit unusual. Could you please confirm if these additions were intentional or if they might have been added mistakenly?

Looking forward to your response.

Thank you!
mavl (2025-05-13 15:05:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
mavl (2025-05-13 15:07:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:44:47+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401173
archie (2025-03-19 07:59:26+00:00): When moving to the "correct" outlines, please adjust your Bing-background first. Otherwise you are - as in this instance - moving objects to wrong positions. Satellitephotos are not per se correct and need adjustment first. How to do this? Please read: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Using_aerial_imagery
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:44:40+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401169
NeisReview (2025-03-19 17:31:25+00:00): #NameCheck

Hello and welcome to OSM.

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits, particularly those concerning the names you've added or modified.

Some of these names caught my attention as they are quite unique or a bit unusual. Could you please confirm if these additions were intentional or if they might have been added mistakenly?

Looking forward to your response.

Thank you!
OldManCelli (2025-04-01 12:30:58+00:00): Hello Botirjon2020. I wanted to just point out that "buildings" are meant to trace the outline of a building. They are not meant as property boundaries. It looks like you are drawing property boundaries. I think you want to you place=plot (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dplot) instead of building=yes

Привет, Botirjon2020. Я просто хотел отметить, что "buildings" предназначены для обозначения контура здания. Они не предназначены для обозначения границ собственности. Похоже, вы рисуете границы собственности. Я думаю, вы хотите использовать "place=plot" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dplot) вместо "building=yes"
habi (2025-03-19 07:57:26+00:00): Und noch Pool dazu erfasst
SK53 (2025-03-26 11:03:29+00:00): Hi Dave, Not sure why I missed the addr:city. Not sure about addr:suburb as "Clifton" is no longer part of the postal address & addr:suburb seems to be doing several things : marking actual suburb as part of the address, adding village name when posy town is not local, e.g. I think  both North and South Clifton would be addr:suburb=N|S Clifton, addr:city=Newark.

I wasn't kern on thus tagging when it was introduced, and seeing a fair few addr:suburb=Clifton has made me more uneasy.

Jerry

PS. I'll try & find a road name for this one too.
Dave Venables (2025-03-26 11:16:55+00:00): There are currently no missing addr:city Post Town values for any objects with DE or NG postcodes https://osm.mathmos.net/addresses/post-towns/
Outside of the centres of post towns I've often added addr:suburb, addr:village and for Wirksworth (addr:city = Matlock) and Castle Donington (addr:city = Derby) addr:town. Am fairly relaxed as long as addr:city is populated. I sometimes add addr:hamlet and have seen addr:locality or addr:suburb used generically
habi (2025-03-19 08:02:19+00:00): Und rund um https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/69255175 ein paar `access=private`-Werte vergeben.
BCNorwich (2025-03-20 07:36:27+00:00): Duplicated highway removed.
NeisBot (2025-03-19 08:15:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was flagged because your added description contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment
NeisReview (2025-03-28 19:40:07+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163960407
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:44:34+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401166
cuzi (2025-03-21 06:45:51+00:00): Sieht gut aus 👍
RO_Transport (2025-04-08 06:18:47+00:00): Hi TOCruns,
The recent tag change "access=no" is now preventing milk transport carriers from routing to this farm. Thanks
olo81 (2025-04-02 06:33:52+00:00): nazwa opisowa do poprawy https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Nazwy
BCNorwich (2025-03-20 07:33:01+00:00): Hi, I've removed the duplicated highways indicated by the warnings above.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-02 04:44:27+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164401157
kmpoppe_repair (2025-04-10 11:25:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 164763734 where the changeset comment is: Reverting undiscussed mass edits to shops in Germany that add mostly incorrect addresses
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-06 10:16:49+00:00): can you take a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4744976 ?

is it open or closed?
chris66 (2025-05-06 14:36:48+00:00): Hi
I think i forgot to set the health Care to disused.

Will fix It when i am back On my PC .
kmpoppe_repair (2025-04-10 11:25:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 164763734 where the changeset comment is: Reverting undiscussed mass edits to shops in Germany that add mostly incorrect addresses
Marek-M (2025-03-26 16:28:48+00:00): Utworzyłeś zduplikowane drogi. Jest to bardzo poważny błąd.
juanbautista_delfinal (2025-03-19 08:37:10+00:00): Hopefully did a better job this time
bxl-forever (2025-03-19 11:36:38+00:00): Yes, you are improving; don’t worry, we are always here to fix and repair if needed.
kmpoppe_repair (2025-04-10 11:25:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 164763734 where the changeset comment is: Reverting undiscussed mass edits to shops in Germany that add mostly incorrect addresses
kmpoppe_repair (2025-04-10 11:25:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 164763734 where the changeset comment is: Reverting undiscussed mass edits to shops in Germany that add mostly incorrect addresses
BCNorwich (2025-03-19 12:33:38+00:00): Hi, You tagged the business onto a block of apartments. I've made a node with your business info. Please check its over the correct part of the apartment building?

Regards Bernard.
Tatfahren (2025-03-19 11:46:50+00:00): Das wurde nicht "nur übers Luftbild getaggt", sondern das hast du vor 5 Tagen selber mit StreetComplete eingetragen. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163601834

Das Problem ist, das der Zufahrtsweg mit "highway=residential" statt "highway=service" eingetragen ist.
Fehlerteufel (2025-03-19 17:51:05+00:00): Ja, da war ich selbst dran und habe die Frage nach dem Überweg beantwortet das da keiner ist, aber man drüber gehen kann! Und gestern sehe ich, dass der Punkt mit "Übergang" getaggt ist.
Die Eintragung zu "highway=residential" habe ich nicht gemacht, könnte ich aber jetzt ändern.
pavvv (2025-03-19 21:09:10+00:00): 1. Proszę, dziel edycje na mniejsze obszary
2. Nie ma takiego tagu jak "turn:". Raczej masz na myśli "turn".
pavvv (2025-03-20 12:07:55+00:00): Dlaczego dodałeś osobną drogę do skrętu mimo braku fizycznego rozdzielenia? Do tego nawet nie zmieniłeś lanes na drodze obok, choć to nie ma znaczenia bo ta nowa droga jest do skasowania.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1369010640
NeisBot (2025-03-19 08:54:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was flagged because your added description contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam
BCNorwich (2025-03-20 07:56:24+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Before uploading please take heed of any warnings, many were given above. 

I'm not sure what you were trying to achieve but Way: 1369011308 (a very long highway) caused the warnings. It duplicated many existing highways thus disrupting routing. Thus I've removed it.

Please see this guide before making more changes:- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide

Regards Bernard.
kmpoppe_repair (2025-04-10 11:25:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 164763734 where the changeset comment is: Reverting undiscussed mass edits to shops in Germany that add mostly incorrect addresses
Aleksandar1994 (2025-03-19 14:40:45+00:00): Hi Sebastian Wallroth

When adding boundaries, consider the administrative level and the roles of relation members. This appears to be more like admin_level=8 rather than admin_level=1. 

Happy mapping!
Sebastian Wallroth (2025-03-19 15:31:44+00:00): Hi Aleksandar, 
thanks for the advice. I am struggling because of unforeseen difficulties like changed inner city borders between 2009 and 2020, differences between state border and city border and Postleitzahl border...
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-25 09:11:36+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12679705007/history has shop = brewery that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
shop=brewery ? Is it shop selling alcohol? Or just place producing it? (man_made=works?) Or maybe both? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=alcohol
opendcc (2025-03-19 11:31:54+00:00): Die Leitung ist nur noch auf alten Luftbildern zu sehen, auf der Erde ist sie weg.
MK2705 (2025-03-19 13:37:13+00:00): Oh, dann ist die Leitung erst vor sehr kurzer Zeit entfernt worden. Im Dezember stand sie noch...
Danke!
kmpoppe_repair (2025-04-10 11:24:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 164763734 where the changeset comment is: Reverting undiscussed mass edits to shops in Germany that add mostly incorrect addresses