piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Zrop (2026-01-02 12:09:11+00:00): weil es sich bei diesem Weg um einen Hauptfahrweg auf dem Parkplatz handelt. "service=parking_aisle" wird nur für Nebenfahrwege zwischen Stellplatzreihen verwendet.

Gruß
Zrop
rempshaener (2026-01-02 12:17:48+00:00): Hallo,
das gilt aber doch nur, wenn es Haupt- UND Nebenfahrwege gibt.
"A parking aisle is a service road that passes between rows of parking spaces (amenity=parking_space) in a parking lot or parking garage (amenity=parking or possibly amenity=motorcycle_parking), providing direct access for a motorized vehicle to enter and leave a parking space."
Und das ist es hier.
Ein reines hw=service setze ich für die Teile, aus denen man nicht unmittelbar in Parktaschen einfahren kann.
Viele Grüße
Zrop (2026-01-02 13:27:50+00:00): Hallo,
ich kann nichts finden wo steht das das nur gilt wenn es Haupt- UND Nebenfahrwege gibt.
Ich sehe diesen Weg eher als Hauptfahrweg/Zufahrt zum Parkplatz
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:service%3Dparking_aisle

- "Hauptfahrwege auf einem Parkplatz, also Zufahrten oder Verbindungswege zwischen Fahrgassen werden ausschließlich mit highway=service gekennzeichnet"

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Dparking_aisle#Disambiguation

- "Road connects a parking lot or parking garage to a through street and serves as the entrance or exit of the lot or garage – use highway=service without service=* instead"

- "Forms the "trunk" or perimeter of the parking lot, connecting multiple parking aisles – use highway=service without service=* instead. There may be parking spaces on either side, but the roadway's primary purpose is to get drivers to another part of the parking lot"

Gruß
Zrop
rempshaener (2026-01-02 14:52:58+00:00): Hallo,
das Unterscheidungsmerkmal ist, ob man aus diesem highway direkt in die Parklücke kommt oder nicht.
Das unterstreichen deine Zitate:
- Zufahrten
- Verbindungswege
- serves as the entrance
- connecting multiple parking aisles
Das trifft hier doch alles nicht zu.
Es ist die einzige Straße, die über den Parkplatz führt -> parking_aisle.
Viele Grüße
Znaika (2026-01-02 16:49:16+00:00): Hi,
wenn ich mich zur Diskussion anschließe, für mich gilt folgendes aus der Wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking
Parkgassen sollten mit highway=service + service=parking_aisle gekennzeichnet werden, während Zufahrtsstraßen in und aus der Parkanlage sowie die Straßen, die den Durchgangsverkehr führen oder das Hauptstraßennetz innerhalb der Parkanlage bilden, mit highway=service ohne service=* gekennzeichnet werden sollten.
Und hier sind drei Bilder mit den Beispielen
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Mapping-Features-Parking-Lot.png
Gruß, Znaika
Fizzie-DWG (2026-01-25 03:16:04+00:00): DWG revert - apparent undiscussed import

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177667698
NieWnen (2026-01-02 13:54:26+00:00): Cześć,
do ref automatu wrzucamy sam identyfikator, bez tego "Automat paczkowy"

czyli 795656

Jak wejdziesz na stronę wiki, znajdziesz to w przykładach: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker#Przyk%C5%82ady_tagowania
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-04 06:53:10+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13424500838

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-04 06:53:12+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13424526609

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Glassman (2026-01-02 22:04:37+00:00): Just adding the address to the building is sufficient. The address node is not needed. The only time you'd want to use the node is if the building as multiple addresses.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176721182
pitscheplatsch (2026-01-02 07:30:17+00:00): Should be reviewed by the local community. IMHO something went wrong, seems like dragged nodes @ Schloßweg ...

Danke und beste Grüße, Pascal
Rooobert (2026-01-01 22:49:50+00:00): Ich habe die beiden Wohnanlagen eingezeichnet, aber sie sind in der OSM Karte nicht zu sehen. Warum? Danke für Hilfe.
Rooobert (2026-01-02 16:01:12+00:00): Ah sie sind da. Dauert offenbar. Alles klar. :-)
TrickyFoxy (2026-02-05 00:04:44+00:00): Маршруты совсем убрали или они перестали проходить по этой улице?
chath_tsu (2026-01-02 11:11:10+00:00): Hi! Thanks for adding the buildings. Just a little editing trick for you - when in the editor, you can right click on a feature and select square, or press Q on a keyboard, to square the corners of a feature. That way the buildings will have right angle corners and look neater. Happy mapping!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176721459
Zorrino (2026-01-03 20:15:21+00:00): Thank you so much for the tip, chath_tsu!
michel60 (2026-01-02 10:41:55+00:00): Bonjour,
Si vous scinder un rond-point (Rond-Point Charles de Gaulle) il faut obligatoirement corriger toutes les lignes de bus passant par celui-ci en supprimant les parties inutiles sinon la continuité des lignes de bus est rompue.
Il semble que cette action est cassé la continuité  du bus:
- Noctilien N146 : https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17365521
GEOFABRIK OSM Inspector permet de visualiser graphiquement les discontinuités avec le lien ci-dessous:
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=2.46461&lat=49.02388&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=1.00&overlays=ptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid

Un rond point peut être inclus en entier dans une ligne de bus. Il n'y a aucun d'intérêt à le scinder si ce n'est à complexifier la continuité des lignes de bus déjà difficile à maintenir
Coridailement Michel
ottwiz (2026-01-01 23:00:13+00:00): Actually this was more of a removal, not adding woods. This is a step before redrawing the entire in better (and smaller) multipolygons.
NeisBot (2026-01-02 07:13:00+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13424475131 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Kleidungsgeschäft"
---
Zum Beispiel könnte eine neutralere und sachlichere Version deines Textes lauten: "Kleidungsgeschäft"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
Miss Fenty Style (2026-01-02 12:41:58+00:00): Hochzeitsmode in Augustusburg
pitscheplatsch (2026-01-02 13:27:10+00:00): Hallo, 
danke für die Antwort. 

Könntet Ihr bitte das erwähnte description-Feld anpassen? Dort steht leider immer noch der sehr werbelastige-Text.

Danke und viele Grüße,
Pascal
coatix (2026-01-04 11:00:33+00:00): Aida Name wurde korrigiert letztes in NSI, ist nur noch nicht in iD angekommen, siehe https://github.com/osmlab/name-suggestion-index/pull/11636 

already fixed https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176813704
ohmanger (2026-03-18 11:00:26+00:00): Hi, thanks for your edit. Has the High School taken on the old Severnside greens?
ohmanger (2026-03-18 11:05:32+00:00): never mind, just found this :) https://www.linkedin.com/posts/shrewsbury-high-school-gdst_girlsschool-shrewsbury-shropshire-activity-7196925751252656128-ALGG/
kaleidoscopica (2026-01-04 19:54:50+00:00): Once again, Mud Creek is a wide waterway, and the river tag was correct. You may want to continue to refresh the distinction between river and stream: you can jump over a stream, but not a river. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Rivers
SomeoneElse (2026-01-15 00:45:58+00:00): Regarding rivers vs streams, I'd definitely suggest discussing it in the forum https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/us/78 and get a third and more opinions!
kaleidoscopica (2026-01-16 00:14:20+00:00): The discussion has been done plenty before - a quick search on the community forums yields quite a few results, in multiple languages. I'd recommend reviewing the existing discussion and, if you feel more is needed, opening a new topic with your thoughts/concerns.
SomeoneElse (2026-01-16 12:41:58+00:00): No - I'm suggesting a specific discussion about these streams in the USA forum.
kaleidoscopica (2026-01-16 19:26:06+00:00): From https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway=stream the wiki guidance is: 

"Use waterway=stream for a naturally-forming waterway that is too narrow to be classed as waterway=river (the commonly accepted rule for OpenStreetMap is that a stream can be jumped across by an active, able-bodied person)."

This seems clear to me. The waterway is significantly wide, therefore it should be a river. Am I missing something? Where is the confusion exactly?
kaleidoscopica (2026-01-16 20:38:42+00:00): For what it's worth, here is some of the existing (global) discussion:

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/river-or-stream/92512/10
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/rivers-streams-and-water-area/100895
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/stream-to-river-transition/97832
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/stream-vs-river/71035
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/stream-of-river/102823
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/nomenclature-tagging-differentiation-between-a-stream-and-a-river/63967

If you search "river stream" in the OSM-US Slack, there's lots of discussion there already, as well.
aighes (2026-01-02 12:11:17+00:00): Hey EvanSiroky, OSM is not the proper location to store historical data. Please remove this relation. You might want to maintain it within OHM project.

See: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/time-zone-boundaries/76086/35
welzheimerwald (2026-01-02 18:54:29+00:00): Deutschland liegt nun in geschlagenen drei Zeitzonenrelationen.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16819467
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15863720

Wann hört dieser sinnfreie Relationenunfug endlich auf?
aighes (2026-01-11 19:06:08+00:00): @EvanSiroky, it seems you are not plannign to remove that historcal data, so I did it for you.
felipeeugenio (2026-01-02 12:14:26+00:00): Hola. Por favor cuidado con las ediciones. Borró un camino por completo.

lo acabo de reponer.

Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176723660
NeisBot (2026-01-02 07:13:04+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13424633600 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Public phone hours Sunday 9am-5pm Monday closed Tuesday through Thursday 9am-1pm Friday 9am-8pm Saturday 9am-5pm"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-01-10 07:32:22+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/176753163
Thanks @user_5359
user_23623664 (2026-01-02 00:42:07+00:00): It's weird that the city on this shows a county (Hanover) instead of the actual city (Ashland) but so do the surrounding fast food joints
NeisBot (2026-01-02 07:13:07+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13424721826 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "CEE Schuko Adapter und Arbeitsfläche vorhanden"
---
Zum Beispiel könnte eine neutralere und sachlichere Version deines Textes lauten: "CEE Schuko Adapter und Arbeitsfläche vorhanden"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-10 07:32:23+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177051320
QuiLe (2026-01-02 01:21:34+00:00): Reverted
eerib (2026-01-06 03:25:17+00:00): Hello Beeeom,

Trails of this kind should not be deleted. Refer to:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F

If the trail is unsanctioned, you can add the informal=yes tag.

If a trail crosses into private property then you can split the trail at the property boundary and add access=private to the portion within the private property.

If you require help figuring out the correct tags to use then you can seek help on the OpenStreetMap Community Forum.

https://community.openstreetmap.org/
Anonix35 (2026-01-05 19:11:15+00:00): Bonjour.
Je viens de voir que vous avez changé l'attribut de certaines routes à Cannes.
Pour quelles raisons avez vous mis le Boulevard du Riou et l'Avenue Bachaga en voie rapide ?
bechirabidi (2026-01-05 19:20:23+00:00): Car ce sont effectivement des voies rapides urbaines :

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Couverture_de_la_voie_ferr%C3%A9e_%C3%A0_Cannes#:~:text=Inaugur%C3%A9e%20en%201974%2C%20la%20voie,du%20boulevard%20du%20G%C3%A9n%C3%A9ral%2DVautrin.

https://cannes.maville.com/actu/actudet_--Cannes-la-rocade-D2-portera-le-nom-de-deux-heroines-_-462068_actu.Htm

https://www.nicematin.com/sports/equitation/arbres-jardins-fontaines-les-idees-pour-rendre-la-voie-rapide-de-cannes-moins-laide-et-moins-bruyante-464128
Anonix35 (2026-01-05 19:29:08+00:00): Hum je pense que ce sont des abus de langage.
J'utilise moi aussi ce terme de voie rapide pour la couverture de la voie ferrée.
Mais il n'y a aucun panneau qui "officialise" ce statut.
Ce sont nous qui le percevons comme tel.
Idem pour la vitesse que vous avez changé. Elle est toujours de 50km/h voir 30 à certains endroits du Boulevard du Riou.

Mais sur OSM, le statut de highway=trunk désigne un axe avec le panneau d'une route à accès réglementé (Carré bleu avec la voiture)
Comme pour la pénétrante Cannes Grasse ou la D6107 dans Antibes.
bechirabidi (2026-01-05 20:24:25+00:00): Sur le boulevard du Riou je n'ai pas modifié la vitesse, effectivement elle est limitée à 50 sur tout le boulevard et à 30 entre le petit rond point et le virage après la villa, si j'ai modifié quelque chose je vais essayer de corriger ça.
Par contre pour la couverture de la voie ferrée c'est bien limité à 70km/h, Waze et Maps l'indiquent de cette manière, et j'en ai eu confirmation de la part de la mairie.

Pour le statut highway=trunk, si c'est le cas, pourquoi la voie Mathis à Nice a ce statut alors qu'elle n'a pas ces panneaux et qu'elle a (à peu près) les mêmes caractéristiques que la couverture de la voie ferrée à Cannes ?
Anonix35 (2026-01-06 07:51:03+00:00): Bonjour,
Oui en effet la voie Mathis ne l'est pas.
Il faut rajouter le tag "motorroad=yes" quand la route possède ce panneau bleu.
Sauf que la voie Mathis est pour le coup beaucoup plus une voie rapide que la couverture à Cannes (échangeur à niveau, pas de carrefour avec des feux, limitée à 70, et séparation centrale)
A Cannes franchement c'est vraiment difficile de la définir ainsi.

Vraiment surpris par contre que la mairie vous ait indiqué que la vitesse est de 70km/h alors qu'aucun panneau ne l'indique, comment est-ce possible ???
Ca fait 25 ans que j'habite là et ca a toujours été 50 pour moi.
frosm (2026-01-12 12:27:28+00:00): il y a aussi un changement de nom avec ajout de rocade sur plusieurs voies tel que https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4728119
Rocade est-il le nom de la voie ? sans être du coin j'ai plus l'impression que c'est l'ensemble de la boucle qui forme une rocade
Anonix35 (2026-01-14 07:28:13+00:00): Rocade n'est pas non plus le nom officiel de la voie.
Tout du moins, il est écrit nul part.
Tout comme l'A8 à la hauteur de Nice que les habitants peuvent appeler "Contournement de Nice"
NeisBot (2026-01-02 07:13:11+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/1463569698 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "news article link"
---
예를 들어, 당신의 텍스트에 더 중립적이고 사실적인 버전은 다음과 같을 수 있습니다: "뉴스 기사 링크"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-10 07:32:23+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177051321
Baloo Uriza (2026-01-02 15:08:52+00:00): Descriptions aren't names.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176725522
Eduardo17172 (2026-01-02 02:07:24+00:00): Olvide mencionar que esta contribución esta incompleta. Continuare dentro de una semana con esto ya que estaré inactivo a partir de mañana
Adam Lanza 2020 (2026-01-02 03:40:20+00:00): Nice
Fizzie-DWG (2026-01-02 04:40:28+00:00): DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176727861
Adam Lanza 2020 (2026-01-02 03:40:22+00:00): Nice
Fizzie-DWG (2026-01-02 04:40:45+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19246
user_5359 (2026-01-03 10:42:47+00:00): Hello! What is the correct oneway value: yes (with key oneway) or no (with key one way)?
Vandana@28 (2026-04-17 01:26:00+00:00): Apologies for the mistake and Thank you for your valuable feedback. I will make sure to be more cautious in future. Thank you.
Fizzie-DWG (2026-01-02 04:44:29+00:00): DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176727922
Fizzie-DWG (2026-01-02 04:44:30+00:00): DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176727922
Fizzie-DWG (2026-01-02 04:44:31+00:00): DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176727922
Tye The Cool Guy (2026-01-17 16:34:17+00:00): Cool
Tristan West (2026-03-15 20:04:45+00:00): Thanks
Fizzie-DWG (2026-01-02 04:44:32+00:00): DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176727922
Tony The Turtle 100 (2026-01-02 16:43:47+00:00): Nice
Tristan West (2026-03-15 20:04:37+00:00): Thanks
Fizzie-DWG (2026-01-02 04:43:28+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19247
Tony The Turtle 100 (2026-01-02 16:43:38+00:00): Nice
Tristan West (2026-03-15 20:04:27+00:00): Thanks
Bubble FTW (2026-03-18 17:18:49+00:00): You're Welcome
chath_tsu (2026-01-02 11:03:40+00:00): Hi! Thanks for adding the stop signs. They are largely well mapped, but they have traffic_signals=signal tags, in addition to the standard stop sign tags, that shouldn't be there. I have gone ahead and fixed the tags. Thank you and happy mapping!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176727694
NeisBot (2026-01-02 07:13:13+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13425565798 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Wellness center"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-10 07:32:25+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177051322
(Deleted leftovers after several edits)
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-01-02 20:04:45+00:00): So, this bridge was temporary after all? Then what was the point of mapping it in the first place, as some semi-automated Lyft account has done?
Joseph R P (2026-01-03 02:08:06+00:00): I'm not sure why they mapped it, but they likely were unaware that it was a temporary installation part of the F1 track.
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-01-03 02:48:45+00:00): (Is this why [semi-]automated edits are discouraged? Plus, I wonder if no one at the Lyft team knew about the bridge being temporary...)
Joseph R P (2026-01-04 22:51:09+00:00): I don't believe there's any automation involved, but rather it's that the Lyft editors usually just map without any context other than more up-to-date imagery than what we can access for free (since Lyft can afford to provide such imagery to its own employees). This occasionally results in temporary roads being mapped, roads being given incorrect tags (most commonly residential roads being mapped as service roads), and several distinct streets being mapped as one zig-zagging way rather than multiple separate ways. Their primary focus is to get the data out their as quick as possible. While fast usable data has its pros for OSM-based nav systems like Lyft uses, that leads to questionable quality control unlike a volunteering mapper not tied to strict guidelines or company contracts (like you and I) would be able to provide.
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-01-02 20:01:03+00:00): Hello, why did you retag Mountain Run Drive as an under-construction road? Satellite imagery from Copernicus Browser shows that this portion has been paved over. Thanks!
Joseph R P (2026-01-03 02:12:08+00:00): Considering it is still within an active construction site, connected only by other under-construction roadways, and likely does not yet have all its lane markings/other finishing touches, tagging it as an under-construction road makes more sense rather than tagging it as an implied completed road.
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-01-02 19:57:30+00:00): Hello, what was your reasoning for upgrading the very western segment of Saint Rose Parkway—between the right-turn slip lane and Southern Highlands Parkway southbound—to primary? There's no other trunk or primary road that specific segment can access, as that's what the slip lane is for. Any information helps, as the potion of Southern Highlands Parkway between SR 146 and the median break is divided and technically does not have access to residential properties. Thanks!
Joseph R P (2026-01-03 02:23:07+00:00): While that is true, I wouldn't overthink the classification of such a short segment of a road that is already tagged as a primary/trunk road for the rest of its route, especially considering it's not really a dead-end stub or anything. Either tagging scheme is fine.