piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
tekim (2024-04-13 00:29:12+00:00): reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149932742
Autopistero20502020 (2024-04-14 08:35:36+00:00): Hi, Tekim:

I understand that the Google source is not allowed for the terms, but I have an official source of the road network of the Xunta de Galicia that I can officially confirm the LU-114 road that passes through these 4 streets to which I already mentioned. The source is as follows: https://infraestruturasemobility.xunta.gal/c/document_libry/get_file?folderid=1859420&name=dlfe-50810.pdf and the other source: https://fraestruturasemobility get_file? file_path =/portal-6/documents_dxmobility/catalog_de_raega_06_2021_.pdf

It makes it very clear on the official route of the LU-114 road, starts Avenida da Coruña and ends in the north round of the N-640 National road, with the length of about 1.42 kilometers (there has been a grammar error that put incorrectly about 1.24 kilometers). What you had incorrectly reversed that it has measured more than 1.42 official kilometers of this road network catalog. Fix in the table of the second source that puts "Rúa Fisterra", is on the other side that he had reversed. So I will reverse it again with these official sources of the Xunta de Galicia.
Autopistero20502020 (2024-04-14 08:40:08+00:00): I pass the 2 sources that I have uploaded it:

The first source is the list of the roads of the Xunta de Galicia: https://infraestruturasemobilidade.xunta.gal/c/document_library/get_file?folderId=1859420&name=DLFE-50810.pdf

The second source is the list of roads that goes along the routes, according to the typology and other details: https://infraestruturasemobilidade.xunta.gal/c/document_library/get_file?file_path=/portal-6/Documentos_DXMobilidade/Catalogo_de_Estradas_RAEGA_06_2021_.pdf

I apologize because I don't know very well translating in English.
tekim (2024-04-14 15:25:05+00:00): Hello  Autopistero20502020,  Thanks for your message.  I apologize for not writing in Spanish.

The issue here is not whether these edits are correct or not, or whether there are other sources that support the edit, but whether Google Street View was used in contradiction to its terms of service.  - and it seems that it was.

You are certainly free to redo the edits from scratch (not revert) using only sources that are acceptable to OSM.  The other sources that are cited above seem to be either lists of roads, or less detailed maps, so it will probably be difficult to derive detailed map information from them. Note that there are a number of services like Google Street View that are acceptable for use in OSM, including Mapillary and KartaView.  You could also visit the area, take your own photos, and use those as the basis of the edit.
Autopistero20502020 (2024-04-14 19:08:06+00:00): Hi again, Tekim:

I understand what you say, I know it is difficult to obtain more information about this road apart from Google Street View, so these sources from the Xunta de Galicia are the only officers of the Galicia Road Network. We will remember that this road belongs to the Xunta de Galicia, which is the autonomous body of the regional communities of Spain.

Taking the photos is a novelty for me, but I would agree if you need to have more evidence of this section of the road to demonstrate that it is official for OSM. What happens is that I do not reside in Galicia, but, elsewhere, so I would say it to anyone in Lugo's area to take the photos and ask myself where do you have to upload the photos?

I hope you understand me something well in English.

Thanks again and regards.
Rodrigo Rega (2024-06-16 15:11:55+00:00): It's a little late to add to the conversation, but I would like to comment that in Panoramio and Mapillary there are photos of this way. Unfortunately I don't see any ref sign along the way to use as reference for ref tagging.
Autopistero20502020 (2024-06-23 21:13:46+00:00): Hola, Rodrigo:

Entiendo que eres de Lugo, pero tengo una referencia que ha tomado una foto real de un cajetín amarillo de la carretera LU-114 que esta ubicado en la Avenida da Coruña esquina Rúa Monte Faro, le paso este enlace: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Estada_LU-114_(r%C3%BAa_Monte_Faro)_km_0_na_Miragrosa,_Lugo.jpg

Eso es la única verificación de una foto real tomada por un usuario de Wikipedia. No es correcto poner el LU-114 en la Calzada das Gándaras que nunca ha existido oficialmente por el catalogo de la red de carreteras de la Xunta de Galicia.

Cualquiera duda me lo comentas por privado o aquí, muchas gracias y un saludo cordial.
Rodrigo Rega (2024-06-23 23:19:46+00:00): Buenas,

Efectivamente, Lu-114 empieza en la Avda. Coruña altura de Frigsa. Se ve en esta foto de Panoramio realizada este año: https://api.panoramax.xyz/#focus=pic&map=17.25/43.022222/-7.564444&pic=02f90a88-abd8-40f4-b561-aef09910f4a9&speed=250&xyz=359.12/2.03/22
aTarom (2024-06-19 17:04:31+00:00): Hola, estamos revisando nombres que potencialmente han sido traducidos de forma errónea, has usado traductor automático para el "name:ru"?
Saludos
Tetryk (2024-04-13 08:16:24+00:00): Proszę, nie dodawaj do peronów tagów public_transport=platform i railway=platform w Warszawie, mimo że tak podpowiada ID. Nie potrzeba mnożyć wartości platform. Tag public_transport=platform jest na punkcie przystankowym i tylko tam spełnia swoją rolę. Tag railway jest dla kolei. Kwestia tagowania przystanków w W-wie była już dyskutowana.
TranslatorPS (2024-04-13 11:54:56+00:00): Się właśnie o tym zorientowałem po fakcie, że tu jest trochę namnożone konstrukcji okołoprzystankowych. Miałem zamiar to wycofywać, ale za dużo innych rzeczy tutaj przy okazji zrobiłem, żebym cały changeset ręcznie przekręcał.
TranslatorPS (2024-04-13 13:24:55+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149951718 Odwrócone :)
Tetryk (2024-04-13 20:21:37+00:00): Ok, sam zmieniam tagowanie przystanków, bo nie Ty pierwszy ani prawdopodobnie , niestety ostatni ulegasz podpowiedziom ID. Mimo wszystko dzięki.
eggie (2024-04-13 08:21:36+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
kornad (2024-04-22 08:11:16+00:00): Hej, swoją edycją i przesunięciem pasów włączania i wyłączania z PAT na Rakoczego popsułeś relacje linii autobusowych w tych miejscach:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/348527349
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1272037353
Widać to na przykładzie tej relacji: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/965570#map=18/54.35762/18.58366
NorthCrab_upload (2024-04-12 16:10:25+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11812158587
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1080040004

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
mga_geo (2024-04-14 06:33:00+00:00): Bonjour,
Vous avez modifié l'attribut "operator" des relations route_master du réseau Kicéo. Depuis le 1 janvier 2024, cet opérateur est "Transdev GMVA Mobilités".
Pouvez-vous rétablir cette valeur ?
Merci d'avance
Marc
Fabe56 (2024-04-14 16:31:52+00:00): Bonjour,
Je n'étais pas au courant de ce changement. D'ailleurs la documentation mentionne toujours CTGMVA (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Morbihan/Transports_en_commun) Par conséquent la maj de l'opérateur est donc toujours suggéré vers CTGMVA https://nsi.guide/index.html?t=transit&k=route&v=bus&tt=Kic%C3%A9o
mga_geo (2024-04-14 19:24:19+00:00): La page wiki n'a pas été actualisée depuis 2018 et l'actualisation de NSI pour les réseaux de transport est que très très rarement faite.
Fabe56 (2024-04-21 11:17:12+00:00): C'est bon la page Wiki est à jour, tandis que la prochaine version de NSI reflètera ces changements dans quelques jours.
En documentant, on s'évitera le retour de cette erreur ;)
mga_geo (2024-04-21 11:49:20+00:00): Pour NSI, je croyais qu'il fallait faire une issue sur le github, qu'il n'y avait rien d'automatique à partir du wiki. Mais je peux me tromper.
Sur Rennes, le wiki indique depuis longtemps FR:STAR, mais NSI https://nsi.guide/index.html?t=transit&k=route&v=bus&tt=STAR préconise STAR
Fabe56 (2024-04-21 12:49:46+00:00): Oui, c'est certains qu'il faut rapporter la demande de maj pour qu'un contributeur s'en occupe ;)
FR:STAR https://nsi.guide/index.html?t=transit&k=route&v=bus&tt=STAR#frstar-a45453 est actuellement associé la page d'homonymie https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/STAR J'imagine en raison du réseau rennais et roannais https://nsi.guide/index.html?t=transit&k=route&v=bus&tt=STAR#star-7ed087
Lejun (2024-06-09 06:52:22+00:00): Merci de vérifier l'exactitude des données : localisation précise, et si l'élément est déjà renseigné.
Bolt028 (2025-06-11 10:42:27+00:00): Hi can you verify if there is access for Way: 120946441 ? Routing shouldn't be happening on this road.
JJIglesias (2024-04-12 17:33:40+00:00): Saludos. Favor revisar:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:fixme
gurglypipe (2024-04-12 17:04:52+00:00): For anyone reading this in future, this changeset is in response to discussion on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149881838
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-04-13 21:18:37+00:00): Reviewed
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149920483
tekim (2024-04-13 20:58:57+00:00): Hello, Thanks for your edit to the map.  Unfortunately, we are not allowed to use Google Maps when editing OpenStreetMap due to Google's Terms of Service, which state in part: "You may not...use Google Maps/Google Earth to create or augment any other mapping-related dataset "
tekim (2024-04-13 20:59:16+00:00): reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149969697
friedrichmeichsner (2024-04-13 21:59:16+00:00): I didn't know using Google Maps was not allowed. I also only used it as a second source for an OSM note. Anyways, thanks for the information! I  just re-added the adress using a different source:
https://regiony.kurzy.cz/pribyslav-okres-havlickuv-brod/ronov-nad-sazavou-cast/20/
silversurfer83 (2024-04-14 18:09:18+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap :)

Danke, dass du hilfst die Karte aktuell zu halten.

Du hast darum gebeten, dass sich jemand diese Änderung ansieht. Ich mach das mal.

Den Weg an sich zu entfernen ist in meinen Augen gerade noch aktzeptabel, da die Bürgersteige rund um den Kreisel alle nicht als eigener way erfasst sind. Prinzipiell ist es jedoch auch OK einen Bürgersteig als eigenen Weg zu erfassen, daher ist diese Verbindung zum Ulmenweg auch ok, wenngleich vielleicht noch ein paar Eigenschaften (tags) gefehlt haben.

Was hier tatsächlich "falsch" war: Du hast auch den Zebrastreifen gelöscht. Ich trage die gerade wieder ein, rund um den Kreisel, du musst deshalb also nicht mehr aktiv werden.

Bei Fragen immer raus damit :)

cheers
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149920684
silversurfer83 (2024-04-14 18:51:53+00:00): Sieht gut aus :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149921085
Marek-M (2025-03-10 09:54:17+00:00): Hej, tablica https://www.osm.org/node/11812267053/ ma naprawdę nazwę 'Pobierz folder'?
wierci (2025-03-12 12:36:56+00:00): Dosłownie jest "Pobierz folder i dowiedz się więcej", dodałam pełną nazwę dla jasności
mariotomo (2024-04-13 17:07:27+00:00): hola. tienen alguien en el lugar, ustedes de Kaart? si tienen la oportunidad de grabar trazas con fotos, dónde las estarían poniendo? ciao, gracias.
Josuer (2024-04-21 19:50:01+00:00): Hola, Mario. Sí Kaart ha enviado a un equipo para recolección de imágenes in situ. Las puedes encontrar en Mapillary usando los filtros de kaart_2 y kaart5 (en cámara 360). El equipo mexicano de Kaart es quien está haciendo las ediciones. Saludos!
habi (2024-04-12 17:51:10+00:00): Thanks for fixing this so quickly, I intended to to that later, from the hotel :)
habi (2024-04-12 17:54:08+00:00): (BTW: I don't know why OrganicMaps submits anonymous notes)
kornad (2024-04-22 07:31:39+00:00): Hej, dlaczego usunąłeś swoją edycją w tym miejscu przejście dla pieszych i przejazd rowerowy przez jednię? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1097279906 
Dodatkowo wytłumacz proszę z jakiego powodu podczas edycji wpierw usuwasz obiekty, a potem na nowo je mapujesz? Przez to obiekty te nie mają już widocznej historii edycji, ponieważ są nowe. W Twojej edycji tyczy się to głównie właśnie przejść i przejazdów przez jezdnię, ale również torowisk tramwajowych czy przystanków.
Adam Haba (2024-04-22 07:46:48+00:00): Cześć. To akurat przejście przez przypadek się zlikwidowało. Wieczorem poprawię to.
kapazao (2024-04-17 08:33:19+00:00): Hola, ¿de dónde obtienes los datos para conocer el voltaje de las líneas eléctricas?
Vivek Dumre (2024-05-23 16:37:14+00:00): Good accurate mapping, keep contributing.#OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149922404
silversurfer83 (2024-04-14 19:12:33+00:00): Hi :)

sieht ok aus. Einen Zufahrtsweg hast du vergessen an die Alte Kreisstraße anzuschließen, aber das hab ich gemacht. Außerdem wäre es cool, wenn du mal nach dem Altglascontainer gucken könntest, der angeblich bei Aldi da an der Parkplatzeinfahrt stehen soll. Auf dem Luftbild ist nichts zu erkennen.

Thema Luftbild: in NRW empfehle ich grundsätzlich erstmal mit dem Luftbild des Landes zu arbeiten. Einfach mal rechts in den Bilddaten gucken. Die sind ziemlich gut.

happy mapping
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149923311
tekim (2024-04-13 20:57:04+00:00): reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149969597
spughetti (2024-04-12 21:46:17+00:00): I've been made aware that this relation should contain the outer ways of each county boundary, not each county. A fix is currently being discussed in the OSM World Discord server.
tekim (2024-04-13 20:56:00+00:00): reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149969564
tekim (2024-04-13 20:55:22+00:00): reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149969548
tekim (2024-04-13 20:54:51+00:00): reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149969527
mcliquid (2024-04-15 16:15:05+00:00): Hi, warum hast du hier alle Attribute entfernt (Node without Tags)?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2981649045/history

Und warum sind die beiden Duplikate?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11812410184
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3940851459

Fehlen hier noch die Relationen?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3896877255

Können zwei separate Haltestellen die gleiche IFOPT-ref haben?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11812410183
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9563630206

Danke dir!
mcliquid (2024-04-25 15:39:09+00:00): Hallo nochmal, schaust du dir das nochmal an oder sollte alles zurückgesetzt werden?
simson166 (2024-04-25 18:48:42+00:00): hallo,
sorry leider konnte ich nicht früher antworten.
ich hatte lediglich die falsch platzierten Haltepunkte an ihre richtigen Standorte hingestellt und die Platzname richtigkeitshalber hinzugefügt. 
Dabei musste leider aber 3 weiteren nichtexistierenden Standorte entfernt werden, deshalb wahrscheinlich die fehlenden Relationen.
Zu den Fragen:
1.	Entfernte Attribute der Fernbushaltestellen wurde nicht angefasste, dass diese mir nicht bekannt sind.
2.	Das Duplikate habe ich übersehen – ist jetzt entfernt.
3.	Platz 1 musste ich neu hinzufügen. Deshalb die fehlende Relation.
4.	Die IFOPT-ref sind aus der Vergangenen Bearbeitungen. Leider kann ich hier nicht weitersagen. Höchstens eine Anmerkung/hinweis Haltestellen in Lkr Lindau habe je Richtung endzahl 1 oder 6. Für Reutin wäre dann 1 bis 4 wahrscheinlich richtig. Nur bei den Fernbusse kann ich nicht sagen.
Grüße
Wanderer2000 (2024-04-13 11:11:33+00:00): Dag Edje,

In Nederland zetten wij geen adressen op gebouwen, omdat deze al op de adresnodes staan die we uit de BAG importeren. Ik heb het adres dus weer van de kerk afgehaald.

Happy mapping,
Wanderer
Metzor (2024-04-12 21:52:15+00:00): Hi Vogelsangxx,

In OsmAnd, you can upload changes seperately. Makes a smaller bounding box, less reviewers alerted, easier to review :-)

Thanks for considering and happy mapping
Metzor
tekim (2024-04-13 00:21:52+00:00): reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149932651
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-05 23:57:31+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6724941682/history has bicycle:repair = yes that was added in this edit
service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with changing this tagging to a more popular version?

I think that in this case difference in key names are minimal, and benefit from easier use of data would be greater

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bicycle:repair and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:service:bicycle:repair
Diabolo68 (2025-12-06 11:17:45+00:00): Hello,
Actually bicycle:repair, service:bicycle:repair and service:bicycle:second_hand are wrong in this case. According to the website : "In our association, everyone is their own mechanic. No work is done for you (we are not a shop), and all repairs are assisted by volunteer mechanics." https://cliniqueducycle.blogspot.com/p/qui-sommes-nous.html
Tags updated
Tag service:bicycle:diy replaced by service:bicycle:tools (more popular) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:service:bicycle:diy
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-06 14:35:11+00:00): Thanks!
citrula (2024-04-12 19:50:32+00:00): I added the noexit=yes to the old bell alignment based off of aerial imagery, but I haven't been over there in a while. Is it connected to the new alignment or a sidewalk now?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149925376
tekim (2024-04-13 20:54:20+00:00): reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149969507
tekim (2024-04-13 20:52:46+00:00): reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149969458
tekim (2024-04-12 21:38:06+00:00): Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Thanks for editing the map, and for providing a source for your edit.  Unfortunately, when editing OpenStreetMap we are not allowed to use Google Maps due to Google's terms of use.
tekim (2024-04-12 21:38:54+00:00): reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149929913
tekim (2024-04-13 16:28:11+00:00): reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149959658
maraf24 (2024-04-16 15:12:24+00:00): Nieprawda, stare mosty nigdy nie nazywały się mostami Swojczyckimi.
pavvv (2024-04-16 16:20:20+00:00): Według SIPu się tak nazywają. Obecnie nie ma tam żadnego znaku mówiącego inaczej.
maraf24 (2024-04-20 11:44:43+00:00): Co z tego, że coś jest w SIPie? Tablice przed tymi mostami zawsze mówiły, że to mosty Chrobrego, a w danych urządowych był inaczej. Zbudowanie nowych mostów nie powoduje, że most zmienia nazwę, bo niby w jaki sposób?
tekim (2024-04-13 16:27:09+00:00): reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149959622
tekim (2024-04-13 16:13:26+00:00): reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149959158
tekim (2024-04-13 14:55:26+00:00): reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149955932
tekim (2024-04-13 14:46:50+00:00): reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149955564
silversurfer83 (2024-04-12 21:54:02+00:00): Danke
BCNorwich (2024-04-13 06:02:46+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You mapped 4 deli's, I've removed 3 of them keeping the one with all the correct tags.

Regards Bernard.
universinthewild (2024-04-13 06:10:03+00:00): Thanks Bernard.( I’m new to this a the app I was using was not showing the uploaded changes - hence four of them!)
tekim (2024-04-13 14:43:39+00:00): reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149955411
mikimapbuilder (2024-04-15 06:36:44+00:00): Descriptive name removed
tekim (2024-04-13 00:26:46+00:00): Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap!  Thanks for your edit to the map, and for the helpful changeset comment.  Unfortunately, we are not allowed to use Google Maps or Google Earth when editing OpenStreetMap due to Google's Terms of Service.
tekim (2024-04-13 00:27:08+00:00): reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149932721
tekim (2024-04-13 14:33:07+00:00): reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149954928
tekim (2024-04-13 14:22:06+00:00): reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149954462
tekim (2024-04-13 14:20:58+00:00): reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149954396
silversurfer83 (2024-04-15 15:58:11+00:00): Hi :)

du hast darum gebeten, dass sich jemand diese Änderung ansieht. Sieht gut aus, du hast nur einen kleinen Abschitt südöstlich des Grabens vergessen. Hab ich angepasst.

Gute Fahrt
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149927192
tekim (2024-04-13 14:20:07+00:00): reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149954354
DressyPear4 (2024-04-13 10:30:20+00:00): As edificações existem
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Mapear_para_o_renderizador
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149927638
RBruyn (2024-04-13 14:25:37+00:00): Olá, grato pela observação. A alteração foi feita pois a referência a PRF não aparecia, pergunto então como fazer aparecer a referência a este local?
Esta foi minha primeira edição por aqui.
Obrigado
tekim (2024-04-13 14:34:17+00:00): reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149954989
Mxdanger (2024-04-18 22:27:31+00:00): Thank you for your edits! I've been slowly working on everything along Tustin Street, south of Lincoln Avenue and this helps a bunch.
tekim (2024-04-13 14:18:09+00:00): reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149954214
tekim (2024-04-13 14:17:39+00:00): reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149954185
tekim (2024-04-13 14:17:08+00:00): reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149954160
tekim (2024-04-13 14:16:22+00:00): reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149954128
tekim (2024-04-13 00:20:53+00:00): reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149932646
tekim (2024-04-13 00:19:47+00:00): The name tag is for the name of the feature only, not a description, such as Casa, also, like some of your other edits, this edit used Google Maps which is not allowed because of Google's terms of service.
tekim (2024-04-13 00:20:06+00:00): reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149932635
tekim (2024-04-13 00:17:57+00:00): reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149932614
tekim (2024-04-13 00:17:17+00:00): reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149932610