piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
michael_ua (2025-02-14 17:50:12+00:00): This changeset was reverted due to vandalism.

hevap04, please follow the street naming conventions https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:%D0%90%D0%B4%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%B8#%D0%92%D0%B8%D0%B7%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%87%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8F_%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BA%D0%B2%D1%96%D0%B7%D0%B8%D1%82%D1%83_%D0%B0%D0%B4%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%B8_%C2%AB%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0_%D0%B2%D1%83%D0%BB%D0%B8%D1%86%D1%96%C2%BB

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162512442
rskedgell (2025-02-12 23:21:58+00:00): Thanks.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-02-13 00:03:18+00:00): Hello & welcome to OSM! Thanks for your work, but one thing to mention. When you've finished mapping a building, please hit your "Q" key, which will straighten the walls and square it up, rather than leaving it crooked! Thanks!
eggie (2025-02-12 21:22:47+00:00): Dag Roy..  Het zou zomaar kunnen, maar het is en was nog steeds getagd als bromfietspad?
NL:G12a

Kijk even hier hoe fietspaden te taggen en dan zijn er in A'dam vaak nog uitzonderingen op de regel.
G11: mofa=yes, moped=no, traffic_sign=NL:G11
G12a: moped=designated, mofa=designated, traffic_sign=NL:G12a
G13: moped=no, mofa=no, traffic_sign=NL:G13

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Cycleway

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-02-12 21:26:13+00:00): Ik heb het aangepast naar NL:G11 muv mofa.

MVG
eggie
NorthCrab_upload (2025-02-12 20:00:51+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1359393764

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2025-02-12 20:00:50+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1359387218

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-13 06:15:54+00:00): #seo #spam
psy-monteiro (2025-02-13 07:39:23+00:00): Bonjour, mon objectif est simplement de renseigner avec précision les spécialités de mon cabinet. Si certains éléments ne sont pas conformes aux usages d’OSM, je suis ouvert aux suggestions constructives.
aceman444 (2025-05-07 16:09:48+00:00): Tak asi ideme znovu, kedze v predoslej sade zmien ste tieto typy zmien nevedeli zdovodnit
Tu sa bavime o tomto:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=162443759

1. Preco oddelenie ciest ako napr. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1359395746, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1359395724 a https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1359395687 , ked sa od povodnej cesty nelisia ziadnymi znackami?

2. Preco pridavanie kopy bodov a zaoblovanie vjazdov a vyjazdov z kruhovych objazdov ako napr. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3884789725 a pripajanie vjazdov a vyjazdov na podivne miesta? Chcete tvrdit, ze napr. pri https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12582854589 idu vedla seba 2 jazdne pruhy oddelene fyzickou barierou? No to asi tazko.

3. Zase hromadne konverzie 'unclassified' ciest na 'residential'? Asi nejdu medzi obytnymi domami (napr. Pharos), tak preco by museli byt 'residential'. Nevysvetlili ste podla ktorej vety tej wiki stranky to robite. To zacnete konvertovat aj vsetky 'service' ci 'primary' cesty na residential? Aha, uz ste to vlastne urobili, napr. v Ilave.

4. Aj tie znacky give_way na vjazdoch do kruhovych objazdov mate z Ortofoto? Nie na vsetkych kruhacoch nutne tie znacky musia existovat (zakon umoznuje aj iny stav). Okrem toho neviem ci su potrebne, uz samotny kruhovy objazd je dostatocnou penalizaciou pre navigaciou.

5. Preco rozsirenie budovy https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/69036785 na susedny pozemok? Ano na Orotofo tam budova je, ale z toho neviete ci je to sucast tej ktoru ste rozsirili, alebo je to samostatna budova, len zdielaju stenu. Su tam rozni vlastnici a supisne cislo nie je rovnake, takze toto rozsirenie nie je namieste. Ak neporovnavate so slovenskym katastrom tak taketo zmeny nerobte.

6. Preco posun cesty https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/490843381 vovnutri obchodneho centra? To aky mate specialny pristroj, ze ste zistili, ze poloha je nespravna?

7. Preco posun jednej strany budovy Shopping palace okolo bodu https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12582920860 ? To ste podl a coho? Cela budova sedi na kataster len tato stena teraz nie a tiez okolo severneho vchodu (tam ste inak dobre pokrivili tie chodniky).

8. Preco layer=1 na budove https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1084199 ? Zase je budova nad cestou? Keby ste vobec pouzili Ortofoto, ktoru spominate ako zdroj, videli by ste, ze budova aj cesta su uplne inak a vobec sa nepretinaju. Zase ste len naslepo odklikli nieco, len aby bol editor iD spokojny?

9. Na sade zmien mate znacku resolved:outdated_tags:noncanonical_brand=24 . Ake znacky 'brand' ste upravovali (zrejme podla navrhov iD)? Akosi ich neviem najst. Dajte mi priklad.

Popis sady zmien "..." asi naozaj nie je hodny niekoho s 9000 sadami zmien...
🇨🇿 Roman Horník (2026-01-10 17:40:13+00:00): Asi by sis měl najít holku, hele. Hodně štěstí!
aceman444 (2026-04-14 14:14:53+00:00): O, dakujem za starost o moje blaho :)
Ale ked teda toto je Vasa odpoved, tak zjavne uz nemate co povedat. Neviete relevantne obhajit sporne zmeny, vsetky Vase zdovodnenia su nepochopenim OSM, manipulaciou dat pre router a pod.
Opravim to, ale nabuduce uz take nerobte.
gurglypipe (2025-02-13 12:26:37+00:00): Heya, could you explain what the intention with this edit is please? The brand= tag is for tagging branding of things, typically for when a hotel is owned by a chain. I’ve never heard of a hotel brand called ‘Private’ and the Brantwood hotel’s website doesn’t mention anything about that. Are you sure this is correct?

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:brand for more information about the brand= key.
gurglypipe (2025-02-13 22:56:10+00:00): Resolved in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162482877, so I guess you saw my comment above.

You can reply to these changeset discussion comments! It’s not meant to be a one-way thing :)
felipeeugenio (2025-02-12 21:00:44+00:00): Hola. Por favor sin el shop=. No venden pescados ahí. Saludos
Limon soda (2025-02-12 21:03:27+00:00): Trato de decirte que no hay otro tag en Mapsme, no hay otro tag el que enviaste no sale, encima no puedo adjuntarte imagenes
felipeeugenio (2025-02-12 21:06:41+00:00): Hola. Desconozco la app que usas para mapear. Quizas es mejor que lo hagas desde un computador ya que lo que estás haciendo no es de lo más básico, que es lo que el mapeo desde apps permite. Quizas Vespucci te puede ayudar, pero es más fácil hacerlo desde un computador.
Ya lo arreglé en todo caso.
Limon soda (2025-02-12 22:36:42+00:00): MAPS.ME  en esta aplicacion sale añardir lugar en el mapa, y todos los tag estan en español como te comente el tag AQUACULTURE no aparece ni siquiera en español, el más similiar era el tag Pescaderia que a ti te aparece como Shop,entonces el problema esta en esta aplicacion que no tiene todas las opciones de Tag. Probare con Vespucci [es una App?]
Pd: Me es dificil andar marcando puntos desde un computador teniendo en cuenta que ando navegando, no es comodo ni practico por ese motivo habia recorrido a Maps.me
felipeeugenio (2025-02-12 22:42:02+00:00): Hola. Deja notas mejor, para que otro mapero las agregue.
saludos
Limon soda (2025-02-12 22:44:44+00:00): Si creo que es lo mejor, lo dejare en notas
user_5359 (2025-02-13 11:41:14+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1355976318. What is the mean of the booth tags
BTS = ACSE,
en = formation
eggie (2025-02-12 21:29:13+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Tip  Geen name=gebruiken om iets te beschrijven. 
Een park of tuin mappen we als een transparant vlak.. Het 'mag' niet op een node. 

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-02-12 21:40:55+00:00): Het park met naam staat nu op het vlak. Paar keer CTRL-F5 toetsen voor het effect.

Naam bij de boog heb ik omgezet naar description. 
In die berceau?  Het boogvlak evt als natural=tree_row. Verder  zie ik ook twee hagen. Die zou je als lijn kunnen intekenen met barrier=hedge

Mapse
eggie
eggie (2025-02-12 21:45:05+00:00): Losse bomen kun je intekenen als node met natural=tree 
en bv species:nl=Linde 
en species=Tilia
enz... 
Zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dtree

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-02-12 21:49:49+00:00): Wat leesvoer https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:garden:type=arboretum?uselang=en
wolfgang8741 (2026-03-29 01:51:09+00:00): this is not the correct building, The Dime Bank Building is the one diagonally from this at the intersection occupied by Chase.
wolfgang8741 (2026-03-29 01:53:49+00:00): Nevermind, This is correct. I was looking at the wrong item.
HellMap (2025-09-10 20:41:59+00:00): Hello, why did you change these cycleway sections into sidewalks? Has something changed here? I have reverted the changeset for now.
joost schouppe (2025-03-20 08:31:27+00:00): Wayside_chapel is deprecated according to the wiki, did you make a mistake or disagree?
Kugelbaum (2025-03-20 13:21:45+00:00): I frankly didn't know it was deprecated.
joost schouppe (2025-03-24 08:27:56+00:00): Aight, I retagged a few of them here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164019131
I don't have strong feelings about this, for my use case I've simply started treating wayside_chapel as being the same as wayside_shrine
Glassman (2025-02-12 22:03:07+00:00): is alt_name:sv=Amerikanska golfen correct? Does Sweden refer to the gulf that way?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162444697
mikaeldui (2025-02-12 22:07:17+00:00): @Glassman I believe so. "Mexikanska golfen" is still the official name as far as I know. Here's one source (popular newspaper): https://www.gp.se/nyheter/varlden/karttjansterna-overens-nu-heter-det-amerikanska-golfen.e5ba9a9e-dc75-4cd9-9c8d-8eec62d7452f
mikaeldui (2025-02-12 22:13:56+00:00): The article's title is "It's now called the American Gulf", so many Swedes probably think that "Amerikanska golfen" is what Swedes should call it.
Glassman (2025-02-12 23:55:34+00:00): Can I get you to discuss this alt name on the community forum at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/gulf-of-america-gulf-of-mexico/124571/177
Hidoo00 (2025-02-13 08:27:29+00:00): @Glassman Obviously the name used is "Mexikanska golfen" and that most likely will never change. As for alt_name, that would imply it is used as an alternative. In this case, it's not, and again, probably never will be other than as a joke, bus this raises the question whether there is a tag for the concept of a loc_name in a foreign language. One could argue that loc_name:sv could be such a tag, in which case "Amerikanska golfen" would make sense, at least gramatically. As for whether we should tag these non-internationally regognised shenanigans at all is also up for debate.
mikaeldui (2025-02-13 08:33:59+00:00): As the Swedish newspapers have told the citizens of Sweden that they should now use "Amerikanska golfen" then that should probably be an alternative name.
mikaeldui (2025-02-13 08:39:20+00:00): I'm aware that my IQ is off the charts so I've tried to explain it so that anyone can understand it. "Amerikanska golfen" is now the official name in Sweden according to the newspapers. Does that make any sense? It's not something that shouldn't be on the map.
loffa (2025-02-13 09:41:09+00:00): According to the newspaper linked above the name on sources such as Google Maps and Apple maps has been changed to "Amerikanska Golfen". The newspaper just states that other maps have changed the name in their dataset.

However it does NOT say that this has been officially recognized by the government and other  government agencies. If you could point me to a source on https://regeringen.se or other official government site I could gladly accept the change. As Hidoo said it could be a localized name but will probably not be changed officially for some time.
Glassman (2025-02-13 17:38:34+00:00): Because of the changeset comments, I have decided to revert this edit.
felipeeugenio (2025-02-12 20:48:09+00:00): 4622885	felipeeugenio	2025-02-12 21:45	closed	OK
4622892	felipeeugenio	2025-02-12 21:45	closed	OK.
4622889	felipeeugenio	2025-02-12 21:45	closed	OK
4622877	felipeeugenio	2025-02-12 21:45	closed	OK
4622884	felipeeugenio	2025-02-12 21:45	closed	OK
4622891	felipeeugenio	2025-02-12 21:45	closed	OK
4622886	felipeeugenio	2025-02-12 21:45	closed	OK
4622876	felipeeugenio	2025-02-12 21:45	closed	OK.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-02-19 22:38:13+00:00): reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162719508
Michaall99 (2025-02-12 21:26:43+00:00): Cześć Michał, dzięki za edycję. Chciałbym jednak zauważyć, że Appkomat ma w OSM swój osobny brand itp. 

Zapoznaj się proszę ze standardami tagowania automatów paczkowych i  na podstawie przykładu Appkomatu z wiki popraw dodany przez Ciebie KRA08BAPP. 

Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

Miłego wieczoru.
michalgy (2025-02-13 08:40:14+00:00): Cześć, dzięki za informację, tagi zaktualizowane.

http://openstreetmap.org/changeset/162457007
felipeeugenio (2025-02-12 20:54:20+00:00): Id	Contributor	Tmstmp UTC	Action	Comment
4623181	felipeeugenio	2025-02-12 21:52	closed	ok
4623195	felipeeugenio	2025-02-12 21:52	closed	ok
4623150	felipeeugenio	2025-02-12 21:52	closed	ok
4623182	felipeeugenio	2025-02-12 21:52	closed	ok
4623180	felipeeugenio	2025-02-12 21:52	closed	ok
4623177	felipeeugenio	2025-02-12 21:52	closed	ok
4623149	felipeeugenio	2025-02-12 21:52	closed	ok..
4623238	felipeeugenio	2025-02-12 21:52	closed	ok. Raro el nombre, está bien?
4623151	felipeeugenio	2025-02-12 21:52	closed	ok
4623179	felipeeugenio	2025-02-12 21:52	closed	ok
4623139	felipeeugenio	2025-02-12 21:52	closed	ok
TrailJunkie (2025-02-12 21:06:57+00:00): Correction: Source used was Maxar SecureWatch Imagery 2024-10-04.
joost schouppe (2025-02-16 10:18:10+00:00): Waarom heb je hier de straatnaam van de brug gehaald?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/6776157
Martin Borsje (2025-02-16 11:18:15+00:00): sorry. per vergissing
rskedgell (2025-02-12 23:36:45+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Unfortunately, your added dragged parts of Vicarage Road, Felcot Road and a post box out of position. I have restored these in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162448418

Please be more careful.
RoyXew (2025-02-12 22:13:44+00:00): Hallo,

Ook snorfietsen zijn hier niet toegestaan :)
eggie (2025-02-12 22:17:35+00:00): Oke, maar dan klopt het toch Er staat toch mofa=no in de tagging.
Dat is de uitzondering in A'dam.

Maar het is wel bebord met een G11 bord of is het G13 geworden? 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-02-12 22:19:38+00:00): Zie
https://smoothefiets.ddns.net/html/verkeersbordenkaart/index.php?lat=52.358437091&lng=4.934722781&z=19
eggie (2025-02-12 22:21:48+00:00): en dan is dit het onderbord text_signs	""","snorfietsen niet toegestaan""
Het was verder wel goed gedaan door jou, maar het is geen bromfietspad. Dat heb ik aangepast. 
Mijn edit https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=162445797
RoyXew (2025-02-13 07:44:57+00:00): Het is inderdaad een G11 bord met onderbord: "snorfietsen niet toegestaan". Als ik het goed begrijp had ik dus een traffic sign moeten toevoege met het G11 bord ipv de tags die ik gegeven had?
eggie (2025-02-13 07:53:29+00:00): Yep..... G11  (Verplicht fietspad)   Dat G12a bord zal er ooit vroeger hebben gestaan en zat nog in de tagging.  
En verder zijn er de nodige uitzonderingen in A'dam.

In Gelderland staat bv speed_pedelecs toegestaan op G11 fietspaden. Ook onderborden. 
Het is overal anders.

Veel plezier met mappen.
Groet
eggie
jaap de vries (2025-02-24 14:41:28+00:00): Jasper zou je aub willen opletten waar er poorten staan, voor privé gebruik en die op slot kunnen. Net als op andere plekken in Nijmegen. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1359409191 hier staat ook een poort
Alexey Vazhnov (2025-02-13 11:40:20+00:00): Hi!

Please don't do changes with such big area.

Please note for the future: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
santamariense (2025-02-17 00:36:04+00:00): Olá bmagrini,

Por que você acha que o anel viário não deve ser primary?

Geralmente os anéis viários são para contarnar a cidade sem cruzar dentro dela. Se você tem conhecimento local, saberia dizer deslocamentos de onde para onde costuma ocorrer no anel viário? Aparentemente, para quem cruza a cidade da MS-306 a leste de Chapadão do Sul em direção  a Costa Rica e Chapadão do Céu, não parece valer a pena usar o contorno viário.

Pergunto isso para tentar acharmos uma classificação mais adequada.

Bem vindo ao OSM!
bmagrini (2025-02-17 12:46:43+00:00): Olá,
Em conversa com motoristas da região todos consideram este trecho como uma vicinal, por isso que eu fiz a alteração neste sentido.
Outro detalhe importante é roterizadores, como o mapbox nao deixa alterar o trajeto para este trecho.
Michaall99 (2025-02-12 22:16:23+00:00): Źródło?
Kris74M (2025-02-13 08:54:11+00:00): https://mokrsko.e-mapa.net/ oraz https://polska.geoportal2.pl/map/www/mapa.php?mapa=polska
FraukeLeo (2025-04-14 09:54:47+00:00): Hallo, den Hohlstein gibts jetzt zweimal in 100 m Abstand, ist das Absicht?
WUSCH1463 (2025-04-14 14:50:12+00:00): Danke für Deinen Hinweis! Ich habe den zuerst eingetragenene Hohlstein an die Position der topogr. Karte gesetzt und den zweiten gelöscht.
Brickblock1 (2025-02-13 08:13:16+00:00): How is this more unified than using SL which is used for busses, trains, trams and ferries?
bbqman (2025-02-12 22:20:34+00:00): Sources also include wikipedia/wikidata
woodpeck_repair (2025-02-18 14:01:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 162662644, 162662635, 162662638, 162662639, 162662647, 162662642, 162662633, 162662587, 162662631 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed and buggy import in Guadalajara, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17264 et al
muralito (2025-02-12 22:46:17+00:00): Changeset revertido devido a erros. Acesse https://www.openstreetmap.org.br/ para saber mais sobre o projeto.
rempshaener (2025-02-13 17:20:03+00:00): Hallo,

du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Dein Ansatz mit dem „disused“-Eintrag nach dem Lebenszyklus-Modell ist genau die richtige Idee.
Du müsstest nur noch das verbliebene shop=supermarket entfernen, dann passt es.

Vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag.

Bei Fragen bitte melden.
Viele Grüße
syntex (2025-02-13 18:23:53+00:00): Dlaczego teraz masowo kasujesz obiekty?
edvac (2025-07-03 11:07:17+00:00): Drogi Olaf Skwarski,

Otrzymaliśmy skargę od lokalnego polskiego użytkownika dotyczącą twoich zmian, które zawierają podejrzane masowe usuwanie danych. W tym zestawie zmian i kilku innych, różni lokalni użytkownicy komentują twoje zestawy zmian, ale nie odpowiedziałeś na żaden z tych komentarzy.

Uprzejmie proszę o odpowiedź na różne pytania, które zadają ci użytkownicy, w przeciwnym razie będziemy musieli zablokować twoje konto użytkownika. Może to skutkować przywróceniem niektórych zestawów zmian.

Pozdrawiam,

Rafael Avila Coya, w imieniu OSM Foundation, Data Working Group.

Ticket#2025061910000424

Przetłumaczono z DeepL.com (wersja darmowa)

Dear Olaf Skwarski,

We have received a complaint from a local Polish user about your edits, that contain suspicious mass deletion of data. In this changeset and some others, different local users make comments about your changesets, but you have not answered any of this comments.

I kindly ask you to answer the different questions that these users are making to you, or we will have to block your user account. This might be followed by a revert of some of your changesets.

Best regards,

Rafael Avila Coya, on behalf of the OSM Foundation, Data Working Group.

Ticket#2025061910000424

(English, original)
Geo-Tobi (2025-04-06 05:21:26+00:00): Hi, du hast hier eine ungültige Kombination von Tags verursacht:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1287608809
HW=footway mit bicycle=designated. Das kann nicht stimmen. Würdest du das bitte zeitnah korrigieren?
NorthCrab_upload (2025-02-12 23:01:07+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10013116122
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12583253732

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
radiotrefoil (2026-02-25 06:23:38+00:00): Hi, I'm wondering if these roads (most of which having the "Lane" suffix) really should be highway=residential, as they seem to only be used for road access to garages and not have any address points associated with them. Additionally they are narrower than the surrounding residential roads and have no sidewalks. They were previously service=alley which I think is probably a better fit.
Stephen Males (2026-02-25 19:59:51+00:00): Thanks for this question and I understand what you are saying. The majority of garages actually have "fonzie flats" or studios above them facing these laneways. Part of my work with the local Council involves inspecting these and allocating separate addresses to the main house on the property. So I often check it out while riding through on my way to work. Hope that helps explain my reasoning. If you can suggest better tagging to make this clear, Im open to hearing it :)
radiotrefoil (2026-02-27 08:51:00+00:00): Ah, cool, I thought that may be the case. Thanks for clarifying. I take it that the flats are addressed to the laneways? If that's the case, I would probably support tagging the laneways as highway=living_street. FYI, This tag has a specific definition in Australia: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Roads
They are similar to highway=residential but relatively more minor as they can be assumed to have higher pedestrian presence. Also they have been decoupled from the designation=shared_zone tag. The brick paving at the entrances is a strong characteristic.
woodpeck (2025-02-13 09:08:51+00:00): Please do not make changes to the names of the Persian Gulf. Under the harmless guise of "Updating and resolving issues" you have removed many names that in some way referred to "Arabic" even though they were only recorded as alternative names. I have reverted your edit.
woodpeck (2025-02-13 09:09:43+00:00): In the future when you make any contributions to OSM, please use a better description than "Updating and resolving issues" so that others may see what you are up to. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
woodpeck_repair (2025-02-18 14:01:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 162662644, 162662635, 162662638, 162662639, 162662647, 162662642, 162662633, 162662587, 162662631 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed and buggy import in Guadalajara, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17264 et al
s777n (2025-02-13 19:16:20+00:00): Здравствуйте. Вы рисовали по бингу поэтому нарисовали более короткое здание.  И вы добавили теги здания на точку организации. Исправлено
RedAuburn (2025-02-12 23:28:41+00:00): pub closed as under construction/renovation. src survey