piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ToniE (2023-03-09 13:20:05+00:00): @ Kreisel ST 2050 / DAH 3
eggie (2023-03-09 13:37:19+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
map per (2023-03-09 18:47:47+00:00): Hello MarlinMM,

this building (1) shouldn't be tagged as a hangar (2) as ther are no planes inside. I fixed that.

Thanks and best regards
map per

(1) https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/915125296
(2) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dhangar
GinaroZ (2023-06-02 11:59:47+00:00): If the school is under construction then it shouldn't be tagged as amenity=school
d_berger (2023-03-10 17:43:06+00:00): Roads under bridges are not tunnels, please renounce from such changes. Thank you.
Mister Kanister (2023-03-10 17:49:51+00:00): Bonjour à nouveau Tursiops33,

il n'est pas recommandé de cartographier les voies qui passent sous un pont avec tunnel=yes, car le fait qu'il y ait un pont couvre déjà l'information que quelque chose passe en dessous. Le marquage des tunnels et des ponts ne doit pas être utilisé en même temps pour les routes qui se croisent. Pour en savoir plus, consultez le wiki OSM :

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bridge#Bridges_with_several_roads/ways_or_additional_features

L'utilisateur @d_berger a apparemment déjà annulé les modifications que vous avez apportées aux ponts ici : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133527988

Traduit avec www.DeepL.com/Translator (version gratuite)

---

Hello again Tursiops33,

it is not reccommended to map ways that pass under a bridge with tunnel=yes, as the fact that there is a bridge already covers the information that something is passing below. Tunnel and bridge tagging are not to be used at the same time for intersecting ways. Please read about this on the OSM wiki:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bridge#Bridges_with_several_roads/ways_or_additional_features

User @d_berger appearantly has already reverted the changes to bridges you made here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133527988
Mister Kanister (2023-03-10 17:50:56+00:00): Dear Tursiops33!

Please take a look at the comments under this changeset regarding tunnels and bridges:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133479059
map per (2023-03-09 18:44:12+00:00): Hello ZECO-AEFE,

and welcome to Open Street Maps!

Please be careful to not accidentally drag Address nodes around. (You moved the Chiemgaustraße 93 around (see (1)))

Thanks and best regards
map per

(1) https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/314451639
marczoutendijk (2023-03-09 14:29:00+00:00): افزودن مکان خیلی آموزنده نیست. لطفاً از add bakery برای نظر تغییرات خود استفاده کنید. این برای همه روشن است!
arnike (2023-03-13 05:31:25+00:00): بله از این به بعد همین کار را انجام خواهم داد.
Frans S (2023-03-13 14:34:24+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, during the validation process.

I noticed that you are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.

We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. Just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.

Buildings ought to be tagged as building=yes. Nothing more, no names.

Please map each building accurate over the rooflines.

Each rectangular building ought to be squared with the Q key.

Nodes of buildings may NOT  connect to other buildings or features.

The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 

Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.


See also this document:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/11PsAW0bzUZHbS8YnbaFzqOYhJY7tSPYG/view?usp=share_link


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133479390
Frans S (2023-03-16 18:12:25+00:00): 
Hello. Thanks for mapping on this difficult task.
About mapping of tall apartment blocks or high buildings

Mapping of tall buildings differs from standard buildings. Because the imagery is taken at an angle, you will see both the rooflines and also the side of a building. 
How do you map such a building?
Map over the rooflines and lastly slide the mapped building to the footprint.
Please adjust wrong positioned buildings as well
This video shows how that is done.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1V5-bADsYiffCD9bo6l64YOdTvmKqMGry/view?usp=share_link

And.... don't forget to square each rectangular building.

Best regards and keep mapping
skyper (2023-03-13 19:03:31+00:00): Hey ralrei,
danke für das Korrigieren der Einbahnstraße. Allerdings bin ich mir bei `service=parking_aisle` und auch beim Herabsetzten von `service` zu `track` unsicher. Ist https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/109443489 nicht die Zufahrt zum Friedhof und sollte besser `highway=service` sein? `parking_aisle` sollte keinen Verbindungscharakter haben und eine Buslinie ist eher ein Anzeichen, dass es weggelassen werden sollte (zumindest PTNA bemängelt es). Kannst Du Dir das bitte noch einmal anschauen.

Danke und viele Grüße,
skyper
ralrei (2023-03-14 06:35:41+00:00): Mit dem nördlichen Serviceweg und der seit 1 Jahr bestehenden Haltestelle kann man durchaus von Verbindungscharakter sprechen.
Ich hab wieder alle Wege auf Service gesetzt.
skyper (2023-03-14 13:32:18+00:00): Schön, dass ich Dich überzeugen konnte.
Beim mittleren der drei Wege des Parkplatzes ist `service=parking_aisle` eventuell angebracht, aber das ist auch nur eine Kleinigkeit.
Danke für die Änderungen und viele Grüße,
skyper
ralrei (2023-03-14 15:15:55+00:00): So, jetzt ist es aber richtig schick.  :-)
skyper (2023-03-14 16:23:48+00:00): Super!
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-01-29 14:31:00+00:00): Hello!

You used
cuisine=juices
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10723483768/history

Have you maybe meant
cuisine=juice
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?
Kuwaity26 (2024-09-04 22:41:32+00:00): Hello, thanks for noticing and sorry for the late reply, I found out I don't get notified about comments to my changeset. You are right, it is a mistake, it is supposed to be a fresh juice bar. I will fix it with my next edit batch.
silversurfer83 (2023-03-10 07:33:07+00:00): Hallo nochmal :)

Einige Dinge:

- Du hast hier (wie auch schon ein paar Edits vorher) einen Namen vergeben, der recht sicher ein Flurname ist. Diese sollten besser nicht an Objekte wie Wälder oder Felder gemappt werden, da sich diese mit jedem neuen Luftbild stark verändern können. Die meines Wissens nach üblichere Möglichkeit Flurnamen in der Karte zu hinterlegen ist mit place=locality und name=$Flurname (siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:place%3Dlocality) Dein Feld hier hat definitiv nicht die Voraussetzung den Namen zu bekommen. Bitte einen Punkt möglichst mittig setzen und da die Attribute dran setzen. Danke.

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
Ich habe dich schon einmal gebeten aus Rücksicht auf andere bitte bessere Kommentare zu nutzen. Ist bis jetzt leider noch nicht passiert. Sei bitte so gut und ändere das in Zukunft. Danke.

- Bitte reagiere auf Kontaktaufnahmen. Ich habe dir Kommentare in deine Änderungen und auch Direktnachrichten geschrieben. Bisher null Reaktion. Sehr schade, da dies ein Gemeinschaftsprojekt ist und wir auf (gute) Kommunikation untereinander angewiesen sind.

Mit bitte um Antwort

silversurfer83
Frans S (2023-03-13 11:43:48+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, during the validation process.

I noticed that you are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.

We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. Just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.

Please map each building accurate over the rooflines.

Each rectangular building ought to be squared with the Q key.

Nodes of buildings may NOT  connect to other buildings or features.

The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 

Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.


See also this document:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/11PsAW0bzUZHbS8YnbaFzqOYhJY7tSPYG/view?usp=share_link


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133479940
dieterdreist (2023-07-25 09:19:18+00:00): undiscussed mass edit
NorthCrab_upload (2023-03-09 14:10:18+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10723630759

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Frans S (2023-03-12 16:37:58+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
You retagged a highway from unclassified into 'service' Unclassified is better, because this road serves a neighborhood rather than a single building or company.
About highway tagging:

Please apply the rules described in this wiki
Most common taggings.
Rural areas : Unclassified,  track , path, service
Urban areas: unclassified, residential, path.


https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highways

Read also the remarks about tagging of tracks in the instructions.
Best regards and keep mapping
ovruni (2023-03-09 23:17:18+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambios se ha eliminado un nodo con mucho mas etiquetas que el nodo al sur, por favor en caso las instituciones cambien de lugar solo mueva el nodo o copie todas las etiquetas tal como estaban inicialmente.
saludos
miluebe (2023-06-21 23:59:10+00:00): Ich war letzte Woche da. An dieser Stelle kann man nicht mehr zelten. Der Wasserwanderplatz ist jetzt ca. 60m südwestlich, neben dem Burggarten. 
Was tun? Diesen Platz einfach löschen?
cserpell (2023-03-09 17:28:10+00:00): Hola, sabes que creo que no es buena idea marcar como "park" esos lugares, ya que son áreas no utilizables, simplemente dejadas entre el enlace de la autopista, creo que landuse=grass es suficiente (según la wiki esa es la etiqueta correcta).
Apirnus (2023-04-17 12:43:51+00:00): See tee on jalgratta- ja jalgtee, mitte jalgrattatee nagu ta hetkel muudetud on. Meil jätkuvalt Tallinnas on heal juhul 9km reaalseid jalgrattateid kokku. Ülejäänud on vanad head "kergliiklusteed" ehk jalgratta- ja jalgteed...
Apirnus (2023-04-18 12:37:34+00:00): Unusta ära... Kõigest ID kaardirakenduse redigeerimise tööriist teeb huvitavaid nalju...
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-04-27 18:13:54+00:00): If this is an actual bike-pedestrian path with a sign, then it should have 
bicycle=designated 
foot=designated 
and not just =yes
Tresho (2023-03-11 15:46:29+00:00): Ciao Alessandro, ho revertato gli ultimi tuoi changeset in questa zona riguardo i nomi delle fermate secondo il database ufficiale di ATV, puoi vederlo qui: https://www.mycicero.it/atv-vr/TPWebPortal/it/timetable/stops
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133482077
alessandrocarmeli (2023-03-11 18:41:13+00:00): Prima di fare il revert si avvisa l'utente
Jillis inactivE (2023-03-09 14:59:39+00:00): Was ik ook aan het doen .. vraag me af hoe dat in de database gegaan is  ... ah, ik zie dat mijn changeset niet doorgekomen is.
eggie (2023-03-09 15:17:04+00:00): Hoi... Dan zullen we elkaar wel in de weg hebben gezeten. 😀

Zal straks nog even checken.
Het voormalige anwb kantoor gaat ook tegen de vlakte.. maar ik wacht maar steeds tot alles echt verdwenen is.
Groet
eggie
RicoElectrico (2023-03-09 19:56:38+00:00): Cześć, pokaż proszę zrzut ekranu, to jakie odwzorowanie używasz w JOSMie oraz powiedz, czy w iD jest tak samo.
czebureks (2023-03-09 23:40:40+00:00): Cześć, przykładowo to wygląda tak: https://snipboard.io/XpjBqE.jpg
(parking przed Netto na Chylońskiej). W iD jest tak samo.
Ten problem wydaje się być powiązany z zamazywaniem widoczności infrastruktury wojskowej i portowej, bo w Gdańsku również występują podobne przesunięcia w okolicy portu.
czebureks (2023-03-09 23:45:41+00:00): Sprawdziłem w zwykłym Geoportalu i tam również ten problem występuje.
ualios (2023-03-12 12:07:58+00:00): Ma dove sta scritto che in un incrocio canalizzato e prescritto da segnaletica orizzontale non è possibile separare le way? E se anche fosse, e sei pregato di indicarlo, dubito che le linee guida e/o le convenzioni abbiano il sopravvento sul routing correttamente mappato. In questo incrocio abbiamo tre intersezioni con relative prescrizioni di svolta e tu le hai arbitrariamente unificate in un punto mediamente distante 30 metri da ciascuna, cancellando oltretutto anche le prescrizioni correttamente mappate. Già altrove hai mostrato scarsa ragionevolezza, ma qui mi sembra troppo. Se non hai argomentazioni convincenti ti invito pertanto a ripristinare.
ualios (2023-03-13 09:02:01+00:00): ...e dovresti anche cancellare questo parcheggio:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1152948684
perché in realtà si tratta di zebrature che delimitano la carreggiata esclusa al traffico.
vasony (2023-03-21 10:41:57+00:00): Szia! 
Légy szíves ne duplikáld be a házszámokat. 
Ennek az épületnek 3 bejárata van 3 külön címmel, melyek már jelölve vannak. 
Nem célszerű az egyiket kiválasztani és rátenni az épületre.

Tamás
emersonveenstra (2023-03-09 16:12:48+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for fixing this, are you going to address the other two issues I pointed out in the changeset?
eggie (2023-03-09 15:40:24+00:00): Dag leon.. Je vraagt feedback. Probeer zoveel mogelijk op de bestaande adresnode bij te taggen.
Op 2c zit ook Personeelsdiensten Hoeksche Waard?

Zou die weg zijn? Dan kun je Hoeksche Branders daar op bijtaggen.
MVG
eggie
leonjnl (2023-03-09 17:09:53+00:00): Dag Eggie, dank voor het checken. Hoeksche Branders en Personeelsdiensten Hoeksche Waard zitten op hetzelfde adres, ze delen het pand. Ik neem aan dat de Branders dan een nieuwe node verdienen, zoals ik heb gedaan?
eggie (2023-03-09 17:26:46+00:00): Lijkt me prima zo...
Mapse
Enock4seth (2023-03-21 21:25:59+00:00): What are you trying to achieve with https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1152968837 ?
Frans S (2023-03-20 10:59:50+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.

You are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.

We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

In iDeditor, zoom in so far that the hidden objects are visible.(blue note on bottom line warns about hidden objects)
Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. Just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.

Tag buildings as building=yes. Nothing more, no names.

Please map each building accurate over the rooflines and squared(rectangular only).


Don't connect nodes to other buildings or features.

The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 

Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.

See also this document:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/11PsAW0bzUZHbS8YnbaFzqOYhJY7tSPYG/view?usp=share_link


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133483890
eggie (2023-03-09 16:24:14+00:00): Welkom bij OSM..
Kleine aanpassing verricht. Info samengevoegd met bestaande adresnode (postcode zonder spatie en format phone aangepast met +31 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-03-09 16:26:56+00:00): format phone aangepast conform tagging OSM
mvg
eggie
Frans S (2023-03-10 10:01:39+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
You mapped/tagged a trace leading just into farmland as highway=unclassified.   Track should be a better tag, however, read the instructions obout tracks, they are not always needed.
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133484486
alix_geovelo (2023-03-10 09:52:12+00:00): sorry for the big changeset, forget to upload between meetings.
Frans S (2023-03-10 09:55:56+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, during the validation process.

I noticed that you are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.

We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. Just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.

Please map each building accurate over the rooflines.

Square each rectangular building with the Q key.

Nodes of buildings may NOT  connect to other buildings or features.

The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 

Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.
1 issue: an exit to a petrol station should be tagged as highway=service. 

See also this document https://drive.google.com/file/d/11PsAW0bzUZHbS8YnbaFzqOYhJY7tSPYG/view?usp=share_link


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133484510
Frans S (2023-03-10 09:25:51+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, during the validation process.

I noticed that you are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.

We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. Just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.

Please map each building accurate over the rooflines.

Square each rectangular building with the Q key.!! You hardly squared the buildings.

Nodes of buildings may NOT  connect to other buildings or features.

The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 

Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.


See also this documenthttps://drive.google.com/file/d/11PsAW0bzUZHbS8YnbaFzqOYhJY7tSPYG/view?usp=share_link


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133484524
Frans S (2023-03-10 09:23:37+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133484525
Frans S (2023-03-10 09:21:45+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, during the validation process.

I noticed that you are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.

We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. Just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.

Please map each building accurate over the rooflines.

Square each rectangular building with the Q key.

Nodes of buildings may NOT  connect to other buildings or features.

The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 

Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.
Tag buildings as building=yes.


See also this documenthttps://drive.google.com/file/d/11PsAW0bzUZHbS8YnbaFzqOYhJY7tSPYG/view?usp=share_link


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133484531
Shaun das Schaf (2023-03-09 18:08:39+00:00): Hallo Pascal, willkommen bei OSM!

Handelt es sich bei diesem Weg wirklich um einen ausgeschilderten Fußweg (Blaues rundes Schild mit weißer Person in der Mitte)?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dfootway

Ansonten wäre "Feld-/Waldweg" (highway=track) doch passender, erst recht wenn hier auch Fahrräder fahren dürfen. Oder falls es nur ein schmaler Pfad ist einfach "Pfad" (highway=path). 

Viele Grüße
Shaun das Schaf
Sammyhawkrad (2023-03-09 17:34:51+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap Richard, thanks for contributing to the map in Ghana.

In this edit I notice that you have changed a business/company to a school. What is the situation now? Does the business no longer exist or it has been converted to a school in the same premises? 

If you are unsure about the status of the business it is better to map the school as a new object and revert the business to its former status.

Best,
Sam
Frans S (2023-03-18 09:33:24+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.

You are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.

We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. Just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.

Tag buildings as building=yes. Nothing more, no names.

Please map each building accurate over the rooflines and squared(rectangular only).


Don't connect nodes to other buildings or features.

The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 

Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.

See also this document:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/11PsAW0bzUZHbS8YnbaFzqOYhJY7tSPYG/view?usp=share_link

Please pay extra attention to squaring of buildings and connected nodes.
Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133485050
Frans S (2023-03-09 18:26:03+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 
A few issues. You included the yard and sometimes a shadow in your buildings.
Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133485224