piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Nordsz (2025-05-17 15:15:19+00:00): Better shot: https://www.google.com/maps/@59.3350496,18.0136195,3a,16.7y,60.74h,88.47t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1soZfQ5tbtXnt98PohoKTBHw!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fcb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26pitch%3D1.5296778750355884%26panoid%3DoZfQ5tbtXnt98PohoKTBHw%26yaw%3D60.74468374414196!7i16384!8i8192?authuser=0&entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI1MDUxMy4xIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D
maro21 (2025-05-18 13:17:56+00:00): Każdy zestaw zmian to edycja obiektów. Proszę podawać konkretne opisy zmian: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
Nodariel (2025-05-17 15:24:51+00:00): First updates for house numbers on Princes Park.
citrula (2025-05-17 17:48:58+00:00): In general we don't normally add plots to OSM. You can map these as a node with only addr:* tags (name is not necessary)
cxzlw (2025-05-17 16:05:00+00:00): revert(161348330): 恢复被破坏的“深国交护城河”

As a SCIE student, I can confirm there is definitely an artificial stream around the campus. 

While the name "深国交护城河" might not be the formal name of this stream, the path is correct and shouldn't be removed. 

In my opinion, contributions to OSM are iterative and open to refinements. In this situation, naming imperfections are acceptable and expected to be refine in the future. Suggestions and contributions are always welcome.
cxzlw (2025-05-17 16:09:31+00:00): 学校自己在公众号文章中称之为“护城河”，因此以“深国交”为定语的“深国交护城河”应当被认为是学校官方认可的称呼之一

https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/69Ym3_RDFgkKof1GRxZl1g
Taksine (2025-05-17 16:53:00+00:00): 那篇公众号文章我看了七八遍都看不到“护城河”三字，是否发错网页？
cxzlw (2025-05-17 17:28:50+00:00): 文字在文内一张图片中。由于微信防盗链以及本人没有喜欢使用的图床，所以不方便上传相关图片，你再翻一下吧。

另外，OpenStreetMap 是非常开放的，如果找到任何更加合适的名字，欢迎进行贡献 🥰
shu0410 (2025-05-18 01:19:43+00:00): 您好，请您查看一下站内信
Taksine (2025-05-18 01:28:37+00:00): 我看到那张图了，我认为你那张图片所述的“护城河”更像是学校对自己内庭水系的一种比喻修饰，不太像是学校官方对该水系的称呼。OSM更看重现场实地有无写为“深国交护城河”的牌子，如果有的话以此命名没有问题。
maraf24 (2025-07-15 15:50:25+00:00): Why did you removed toll yes information from "toll road" (this is your comment)?
Vodevil_Mark (2025-07-15 16:06:27+00:00): https://etoll.gov.pl/ru/sistema-e-toll/set-platnykh-dorog/

Take a look for yourself, this site is free
maraf24 (2025-07-15 18:13:47+00:00): And your comment states otherwise. 
Maybe next time try not to use generic statement as a comment?
Vodevil_Mark (2025-07-15 19:00:25+00:00): I mapped the toll roads in Poland in two days. The goal was to do it quickly and efficiently. I think the rest is just trifles. The main thing is that you don't have to redo it after me.
pyram (2026-07-07 09:16:31+00:00): Hi BrummsLee,

warum hast Du den Namen der Haltestelle https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2210073069/history/7 geändert? Das steht so nicht vor Ort und sagt so auch keiner.
BrummsLee (2026-07-07 10:43:57+00:00): Sorry, das war mein Fehler. Damals war ich noch der Meinung, daß überall der Ortsname an der Haltestelle dazu muß, damit man weiß, wo man ist.
Inzwischen weiß ich, daß so etwas in `ref_name` kommt. Hab es gleich geändert...
nekocake kitsu (2025-05-19 09:08:56+00:00): (edit: theres no seat pos info due to it being unnecessary)
b-jazz (2025-05-18 06:16:16+00:00): RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1387572440

Hello Jim,

Please don't share the nodes of the green if you have the fairway surrounding the green. If you can't see any fringe around the green, you should make the fairway butt up to the green and share the nodes on the boundary *between* the green and fairway instead. Please read the wiki for visual examples and instructions on how to better map golf courses: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls. If you have any questions, please let me know and I'll gladly help clarify things. Thanks!
Jim Leary (2025-05-18 06:27:08+00:00): Thanks for the feedback and the link to the proper way!  I better understand and will update per the instructions.
b-jazz (2025-05-18 07:14:32+00:00): Awesome. Glad to hear it. Thanks for getting back to me so quickly.
Gregory Peony (2025-05-17 18:43:16+00:00): The vast majority of footprints here are valid and appropriately shaped. The buildings I flagged here do not share a common wall so should not share nodes. Hold alt to prevent your cursor from snapping to existing data.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166400280
Gregory Peony (2025-05-17 18:17:41+00:00): All buildings here are valid and appropriately rounded but are not as accurate as they could be. For example the Western most building was ~90 m^2 as you mapped it but is actually closer to 45 m^2. The accurate sizing buildings is important for accurate population estimates. Building footpritns can be the size of the roof, or smaller if the roof overhangs the walls; you can use the shortcut shift+(-/+) to scale selected features so that their size is accurate. The shadows round buildings cast help determine their size. Thank you for mapping.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166400548
RKamieth (2025-05-17 17:19:44+00:00): Bitte diesen Änderungssatz nicht übernehmen. Ich habe die drei Wege versehentlich gelöscht.
sjakobi (2025-07-24 22:48:37+00:00): Hi!

Ich habe heute hier einen Weg eingezeichnet: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169405376

Kann es sein, dass du diesen Weg zuvor gelöscht hast? Soll dein obiger Kommentar darauf hindeuten, dass dein Änderungssatz rückgängig gemacht werden soll?

Nebenbei: Es ist oft besser, nicht mehr existierende Wege etc per Lifecycle-Präfix zu markieren, anstatt sie ganz zu löschen. Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

Schöne Grüße,
Simon
Gregory Peony (2025-05-17 17:55:23+00:00): A valid and accurate footprint. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166400796
YomanNH (2025-05-18 18:48:24+00:00): Czy na pewno wiesz co to jest rumowisko skalne? Z pewnością nie jest to kawałek ziemi wysypany kamykami, który błędnie zmapowałeś jako natural=scree. Poprawisz?
YomanNH (2025-05-21 20:30:50+00:00): Widzę, że tradycyjnie ignorujesz komentarze i nie poprawiasz swoich błędów w mapowaniu. Usunąłem fikcyjne rumowiska skalne.
NeisReview (2025-05-18 07:35:54+00:00): #NameCheck

Hello and welcome to OSM.

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits, particularly those concerning the names you've added or modified.

Some of these names caught my attention as they are quite unique or a bit unusual. Could you please confirm if these additions were intentional or if they might have been added mistakenly?

Looking forward to your response.

Thank you!
gsr95 (2025-05-18 15:08:20+00:00): Hi yes this change was intentional on my part. It's my first time suggesting edits so hopefully I did it correctly. I made 2 changes yesterday.

1) Added the location of a convenience shope called 'A punaos'. (and i deleted the old location)

2) Changed the name of the cafe opposite to 'La Esquinuca'.

Hopefully these were helpful edits!
NeisReview (2025-05-19 06:20:31+00:00): 👍 Thank you for your map updates.

#HappyMapping
ManuelB701 (2025-05-17 17:43:00+00:00): I assume you forgot to save on iD or had written to an open changeset? This is because you edited stuff in both Munich and Seydisfjordur which affects more things than a single bench.
NieWnen (2025-05-18 12:47:51+00:00): Cześć, CPR tagujemy inaczej. Zachęcam do zapoznania się z wiki i poprawy: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Rowery#Drogi_dla_pieszych_i_rower%C3%B3w
olecky (2025-05-19 05:00:59+00:00): ok, dzięki za linka, poprawione.
Mariusz Dykierek (2025-07-19 19:27:55+00:00): Proszę o usunięcie tych zmian na punktach toll:bus! Są nadmiarowe, bo way ma to ustawione.
Vodevil_Mark (2025-07-19 19:33:58+00:00): Z jakiegoś powodu myślałem, że już poprawiłem takie błędy. Dobra, zajmę się wkrótce
jeslop (2025-05-18 15:51:32+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166437411
jeslop (2025-05-18 15:51:33+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166437411
jeslop (2025-05-18 15:52:12+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166437444
jeslop (2025-05-18 15:52:13+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166437444
jeslop (2025-05-18 15:52:14+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166437444
jeslop (2025-05-18 15:53:16+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166437496
jeslop (2025-05-18 15:53:17+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166437496
user_5359 (2025-05-19 06:54:55+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I revert your changes set, because all nodes are moved more than 100 Meters
zstadler (2025-05-24 09:36:53+00:00): שלום PrimmCourier,

ברוך השב אל קהילת הממפים הפעילים!

מיפוי של שערים סגורים הוא מאד חשוב למטיילים. שער אחד מאלו שמיפית נמצא על הצומת, ולכן לא ברור את מי משלושת הדרכים שנפגשות שם הוא חוסם.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12844661776

תוכל בבקשה לתקן את המיפוי ולמקם את השער על אחת הדרכים ולא בצומת עצמו?

הסבר מפורט אפשר לראות בדף הוויקי על מחסומים
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:barrier#How_to_map_barrier_nodes

תודה על תרומתך למיפוי ב OSM ועל התיקון!
jeslop (2025-05-18 15:53:18+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166437496
I-76 (2026-01-27 18:37:46+00:00): Hey there, 

Just wanted to let you know for the future not to name things what they are, like buildings as "Building". I have removed the name from the 50 buildings you added.

Another thing is the hotkey Q to square corners of buildings. That makes them look nicer and not flag suggestions on the renderer.

Happy mapping!
jeslop (2025-05-18 15:54:12+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166437551
jeslop (2025-05-18 15:54:13+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166437551
jeslop (2025-05-18 15:54:14+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166437551
jeslop (2025-05-18 15:55:57+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166437643
Gregory Peony (2025-05-17 18:28:27+00:00): The southern footprint here is oversized (mapped as 100 m^2 actually ~ 65 m^2. Accurate sizing is improtant for accurate population estimates: you can scale selected features using shift+(-/+) to make them an accurate size. Thanks for mapping. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166403766
jeslop (2025-05-18 15:55:58+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166437643
trial (2026-02-25 21:25:57+00:00): Bonjour, PR n'est pas un nom de chemin, c'est un type de chemin, un partie de ref, un itinéraire de petite randonnée peut par contre avoir nom, sybole, etc.
DiaouligRu (2026-02-26 10:02:27+00:00): Bonjour. Tout à fait d'accord. Je ne sais pas si l'utilisateur qui avait créé ce tag est au courant de cela.
trial (2026-02-26 10:20:29+00:00): Ah, m..., je me suis fait avoir avec l'historique. Bon comme il ne contribue plus, ça ne sert pas à grand chose de le lui dire.
Lui aussi ajoutait les noms en breton, avec un beau commentaire en plus : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27431694/history (toutefois sans source:name:br)
jeslop (2025-05-18 15:55:35+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166437618
Mariusz Dykierek (2025-07-13 16:16:47+00:00): Czy ustawienie na punktach nadmiarowego tagu toll:bus to sabotaż?
Way ma ustawionego tego taga!
jeslop (2025-05-18 16:12:21+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166438373
jeslop (2025-05-18 16:12:22+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166438373
jeslop (2025-05-18 16:12:23+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166438373
jeslop (2025-05-18 16:12:24+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166438373
jeslop (2025-05-18 16:12:25+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166438373
jeslop (2025-05-18 16:17:47+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166438593
jeslop (2025-05-18 16:17:48+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166438593
jeslop (2025-05-18 16:15:56+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166438529
jeslop (2025-05-18 16:19:09+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166438652
Gregory Peony (2025-05-17 19:06:02+00:00): Almost all footprints valid, appropriately shaped and accurate. I think that the footprint I flagged envelopes vegetation. It appears to have grown compared to Mapbox and colour is quite green. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166404646
bartgron (2025-05-18 21:54:45+00:00): Is this name correct? Who was Jash Low?
bartgron (2025-05-18 22:00:45+00:00): Reverted:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166450312
jeslop (2025-05-18 16:13:47+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166438449
jeslop (2025-05-18 16:19:55+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166438678
roptat (2025-05-17 19:06:08+00:00): il y a des petits problèmes avec ce bout de réseau ;)

https://knooppuntnet.be/fr/analysis/route/19142658

Notament, ça devrait être lwn et non rwn. Les nœuds aux extrémités devraient être des carrefours, et appartenir à la relation parente, pas à la relation que tu as créée entre les deux carrefours. Il y a un trou sur le trajet au niveau de la rue de la Sausse.
Guyou (2025-05-18 19:10:45+00:00): Bonjour, je débute avec ces concepts. Je vais m'améliorer au fur à mesure.
jeslop (2025-05-18 16:19:56+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166438678
jeslop (2025-05-18 16:19:57+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166438678
jeslop (2025-05-18 16:24:13+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166438953
jeslop (2025-05-18 16:25:04+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166438983
jeslop (2025-05-18 16:21:09+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166438795
jeslop (2025-05-18 16:20:58+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166438772
jeslop (2025-05-18 16:25:05+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166438983
jeslop (2025-05-18 16:25:06+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166438983
jeslop (2025-05-18 16:27:30+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166439129
t_ja (2025-05-17 21:04:58+00:00): I believe this is a mistake, and the toll should only be on the ways and NOT on more than 300 nodes 🤯
Vodevil_Mark (2025-05-17 22:36:06+00:00): Спасибо за заметку. Я недавно маплю, бывает допускаю ошибки. Я уже знаю об этой проблеме, чуть позже уберу теги с точек и оставлю только линии
Thanks for the note. I'm new to mapping, sometimes I make mistakes. I already know about this problem, a little later I'll remove the tags from the dots and leave only the lines
rohieb (2025-05-30 01:00:16+00:00): Was bedeutet "except" hier? Im Wiki ist es nur für Einschränkungsrelationen dokumentiert. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:except
sillywalks (2025-05-31 04:49:18+00:00): Dort ist die EInfahrt verboten, in beide Richtungen. Hättest du lieber zwei Punkte mit der Einfahrtsbeschränkung an beiden Enden?
rohieb (2025-05-31 11:14:31+00:00): Ist okay, ich habe mich nur gewundert, warum der Tag nicht dokumentiert ist.
sillywalks (2025-06-01 03:23:56+00:00): Im Wiki-Eintrag von no_entry <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:restriction%3Dno_entry>
rohieb (2025-06-12 19:20:37+00:00): Nebenbei: ich glaube, dass du die Doku im Wiki missverstanden hast; für restriction=no_entry oder restriction=only_left_turn hättest du eine Relation (siehe <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Einf%C3%BChrung_Relationen>) anlegen müssen, und es nicht nur einem einfachen Punkt setzen müssen (wo ist bei einem Punkt links und rechts, und von wo nach wo ist die Einfahrt verboten…?)

Ich hab mir die Situation hier gestern nochmal vor Ort angeschaut. Dadurch, dass das Zeichen 267 "Verbot der Einfahrt" mit Ausnahme "Fahrräder frei" an beiden Enden dieser Linie steht (danke übrigens für die passenden traffic_sign=DE:267 als Punkte!), heißt das im Endeffekt, dass auf dieser Linie keine Fahrzeuge außer Fahrräder erlaubt sind, egal in welche Richtung. Das lässt sich hier einfacher mit Zugangsregelungen wie vehicle=no + bike=yes beschreiben. So habe ich es eben in Änderungssatz https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167548405 gelöst (und es wird auf der Karte auch entsprechend gerendert).
rempshaener (2025-05-18 07:48:06+00:00): Hallo,
eine Anmerkung zu https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/309705237.
Es ist nicht so gut, dass der Hydrant mit der Straße verbunden ist. Das lässt sich aber sehr schnell beheben: im Editor (in iD, ich weiß nicht, wie das in Vespucci geht) „E“  drücken und der Hydrant löst sich von der Straße. 
Viele Grüße
rohieb (2025-06-12 19:15:20+00:00): Solche Fahrrad-Anlehnbügel wie im Fußgängerbereich Kuhstraße sind von beiden Seiten nutzbar, daher bitte die Kapazität verdoppeln. Ich ändere das aber gleich selbst :-)
AjBelnuovo (2025-05-24 18:22:17+00:00): Se a plataforma está no Terminal Piracicamirim por que precisa ter o nome inserido na plataforma?
andersoal (2025-05-24 21:48:25+00:00): Entendi ser importante para deixar claro em uma rota de ônibus de qual terminal no nome.  Em outros terminais vai existir as mesmas plataformas. Ex: Rota https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19142710#map=15/-22.74654/-47.63846&layers=T
andersoal (2025-05-24 22:02:48+00:00): Também é importante considerar o `name` versus `ref`, veja que no `ref` está apenas o número da plataforma.

Na documentação não identifiquei com clareza qual seria o recomendado:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:public_transport%3Dplatform
AjBelnuovo (2025-05-25 16:42:39+00:00): Este é o padrão adotado para designar plataforma
https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?way=1163705503#map=19/-23.527527/-46.775640
andersoal (2025-05-25 19:03:09+00:00): Se mostrar exemplo para justificar a um modelo ou outro, então:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/731253073
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/743179644

https://www.emtu.sp.gov.br/emtu/institucional/anuncie/espacos-disponiveis/terminal-santo-andre-leste.fss
https://www.emtu.sp.gov.br/emtu/institucional/anuncie/espacos-disponiveis/terminal-santo-andre-oeste.fss

Me desculpe, mas mostrar um exemplo isolado no OSM não quer dizer que valida o entendimento do que é mais adequado. Tento me basear no que está na Wiki OSM ou em exemplos de aplicativos que interajam com OSM.

Esse aqui por exemplo: https://osmand.net/blog/guideline-pt/

não deixa claro sobre o nome, mas lendo os detalhes poderia ser interpretado que, caso a platform ou bus_stop não tenha um código único na cidade, então deve existir um nome único que identifique o mesmo na malha de transporte público.

Entendo que a documentação (Wiki) tem esse objetivo de dizer o que é adequado/boa prática, e como comentei, na rota fica estranho se deixar o nome só "Plataforma A01",
veja a captura de tela abaixo do link que passei da rota (bus route) destacando isso:

https://imgur.com/a/U3hwc3V

Ainda, se pesquisar no app OsmAnd:

https://imgur.com/a/jGzTLZ8

Não é claro de qual Terminal ao pesquisar pela Plataforma.

Se ainda assim considera que deve ser "Plataforma 01" e não "TPI Plataforma 01". Ok, já ajusto onde não estiver seguindo essa recomendação. Espero que não seja o caso, haja visto o exemplo do OsmAnd que passei.

Fico no aguardo. Obrigado
andersoal (2025-05-25 19:26:08+00:00): Outro exemplo, esse de outro país: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4411935555

https://imgur.com/a/EFvEjnx
AjBelnuovo (2025-05-25 19:44:21+00:00): No exemplo que enviou da EMTU, apesar de ter 2 terminais próximos, Leste e Oeste, a EMTU não os nomeia além de plataforma.
Se a pessoa não sabe para qual local vai, qual a lógica de fazer busca por plataforma?
Mas, se quiser saber qual é o padrão usado no Brasil, entre num dos grupos do OSM no Telegram e pergunte.
Algumas ações não são copiadas tal qual é feita em outros países.
AjBelnuovo (2025-05-25 19:47:31+00:00): E pra mim, a informação que deveria ser colocada é a localização de parada de cada linha dentro do terminal. Isto, sim, facilitaria a vida de quem usa um aplicativo tipo Moovit.
andersoal (2025-05-25 21:22:45+00:00): No exemplo da EMTU que coloquei de uma plataforma de ônibus tem o prefixo STO e STL no nome da plataforma, claramente infringindo o "padrão" que diz.

Moovit tem suas regras e editor próprio, eu contribui para o projeto de Piracicaba alguns anos atrás e eles na época recomendaram  uma única plataforma para o terminal e não um para cada uma (A01, A02, B01, B02, etc). Argumento deles era de que no app deles a experiência de uso ficava confusa para muitos usuários com vários POI aparecendo na mesma localização. Eu também concordo que pela experiência seria melhor nomear exatamente a plataforma em que o ônibus vai parar, se isso, e normalmente é, considerada uma regra. Facilita para o usuário se localizar dentro do terminal.

Vou adotar o que diz a partir de agora e remover prefixo do terminal das plataformas. 

Obrigado
andersoal (2025-05-25 21:29:41+00:00): Só complementando o exemplo da EMTU

No Terminal Santo André Leste o nome da plataforma tem o prefixo STL, claramente a sigla que identifica o terminal.
STL Plataforma D

No Terminal Santo André Oeste acontece o mesmo
STO Plataforma E

Então considerando a inferência do caso Terminal Piracicamirim dr Integração aqui em Piracicaba, então os nomes das plataformas não deveriam ter o prefixo STO e STL
NorthCrab_upload (2025-05-17 19:44:24+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.

"Spręcowo":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12842167127
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1386611403
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1387300679

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
mga_geo (2025-05-18 17:09:05+00:00): Bonsoir,
L'attribut network pour le réseau STAR est FR:STAR. Les suggestions d'iD ne sont pas toujours exactes.
Pouvez-vous corriger ?
Marc
user_5359 (2025-05-18 14:35:33+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You move a the node https://www.osm.org/node/3125170383 more than 100 meters. I revert your change set.
Tjuro (2025-05-18 08:22:48+00:00): Beste A-dg6,

Ik zie dat je hier onder andere smoothness= hebt verwijderd cycleway:surface op fietspaden hebt toegevoegd en meer dingen die niet de bedoeling zijn,

Dit komt omdat je de SurfaceOverlay van street complete gebruikt hebt, de SurfaceOverlay houd niet goed rekening met de bestaande situatie.

Gelieve geen SurfaceOverlay meer te gebruiken.

Voor meer info zie:

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/duitse-stijl-surface-tagging-op-fietspaden-door-streetcomplete/92572

Ik heb de schade hersteld.

Met vriendelijke groet,

Tjuro
jeslop (2025-05-18 16:27:31+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166439129
jeslop (2025-05-18 16:31:24+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166439341
TrickyFoxy (2025-05-18 12:03:52+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166427727