piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Vinber-Pro (2024-02-05 16:41:00+00:00): bonjour Les Gamins, c'est une école c'est bien cela ?

Comme l'école Le calin ? 

quels sont les niveaux de ces écoles ? pour quels enfants et quels ages ?
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:35:27+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365465
Wilmer Osario (2023-09-11 13:14:51+00:00): ¡Hola y bienvenido a OpenStreetMap!

Le agradecemos grandemente su ayuda para agregar datos de esta zona al mapa 😄.

¿Es usted habitante de la zona?
aTarom (2023-09-11 13:29:57+00:00): Hi, please do not delete and redraw, the history of existing elements must be respected
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/26183795/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1206854743/history
If you need any help please ask in this same changeset and we can help you
evkalina (2023-11-27 17:11:53+00:00): ok
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:35:20+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365462
bxl-forever (2023-09-11 11:28:54+00:00): Done.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:31:56+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365422
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:31:49+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365421
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:31:43+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365420
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:31:37+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365418
mcliquid (2023-09-11 11:32:20+00:00): Hi, die offizielle ref laut Datenblatt der Landesregierung lautet 48.074 (https://apps.vorarlberg.at/wegweiser/48_Laterns/48.074.pdf). Stimmen deine Änderungen? Dann wäre das offizielle Datenblatt falsch.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141107005
jeka p (2023-09-11 19:35:47+00:00): Hi!
dasselbe hier.
Vor Ort: 48.74.
Es kann auch sein, dass Land Vorarlberg die Aufkleber nicht ausgebessert sein.
Ich habe schon öfters gesehen, dass hier:
https://apps.vorarlberg.at/wegweiser/
ein Null, nach Komma gibt, und vor Ort keinen.
Welche Bezeichnung richtig ist, kann ich leider nicht sagen..
SG
jeka p (2023-09-11 19:37:59+00:00): Genau dasselbe mit "Ele":
vor Ort 1052
Ich habe leider das Foto gelösch und kann nicht sagen, ob "1052" noch original gedruckt ist oder mit "1052" überklebt.
SG
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:31:34+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365415
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:31:29+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365411
oba510 (2023-09-13 08:43:10+00:00): Hi Ganesh, none of the toll=yes tags you added around the Bay Area across several changesets were correct, as far as I can tell. You might want to double-check your other edits.

(Fyi, the bridges across San Francisco Bay are only tolled in one direction; there's no eastbound toll.)
Maneesh-Mahlawat (2023-09-15 05:45:47+00:00): Yes, it is a mistake that Ganesh Bhardwaj made. I talked to the user. Thank you for reverting this change
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:31:21+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365405
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:31:14+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365404
mcliquid (2023-09-11 11:40:44+00:00): Hi, warum schreibst du in der Beschreibung des Änderungssatzes immer nur "Details added"? Hier wäre doch "Viehgitter am Netschelweg ergänzt" viel passender. 
Schau dir auch mal diese Seite an: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
Frans S (2023-09-11 13:21:34+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
A: E: Inaccurate mapped and / or not squared.
C: Collecting multiple buildings and mapping them as 1 building.
D: Connecting nodes of buildings to other buildings or features like roads and residential areas.
H: Incorporated the yard or a clearing into the mapping.
Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141107486
samwein (2023-09-11 14:05:41+00:00): Thanks for the feedback. There is definitely a learning curve here. A couple of questions: Is there a way to tag individual buildings or areas as "above my skill level"?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141107486
Frans S (2023-09-11 14:10:48+00:00): Hi. Thanks for your reaction.
This is what we want to achieve. However. Only on project level the required level of mappers can be set.
When a project is mostly mapped we often change the level to experienced mappers to map the balance.

Best regards
Frans S (2023-09-11 13:18:12+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 
Please use the Bing Imagery as well. Very detailed and clear.
Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141107633
Frans S (2023-09-11 13:16:00+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 
Just a remark. It is not logical that a track is leading off a path. Tag both of them as a path.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141107683
Frans S (2023-09-11 13:13:04+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
A: E: Inaccurate mapped and / or not squared.
D: Connecting nodes of buildings to other buildings or features like roads and residential areas.
Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141107850
ogo_cabron (2023-09-11 13:26:49+00:00): Hi there, 
Does "bad" means that everything is bad? 
Should I change all the mappings ? 
How should I proceed ? 
Thanks
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141107850
Frans S (2023-09-11 13:36:16+00:00): Please take a look at your mappings.
when you open this changeset in your editor You see your original mappings.
Best is to practice on an easier task.  We take care of the already mappings.
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141107850
ogo_cabron (2023-09-11 14:08:04+00:00): Hi, I landed on this random task from hotosm. that's my entry point for edition. No clear indication of what is (or not) an easy task for a newcomer. What would be an easier task plz ?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141107850
Frans S (2023-09-11 14:17:31+00:00): Just select a task by manual clicking on a non mapped task and review it. Scan the area and decide if you want to try it.
The other way is to pick a random task, review it and click on the 'more mappings needed button on TM4
However,  Most of the tasks are already mapped.  When you see a yelllow colored task, it is invalidated and need to be re-mapped or adjusted.
Not a task for beginners. Just find another project on TM4, level beginners.
If you want, I put your name on my watch list, which I regularly check. Then I can comment on your mappings
Let me know en best regards
Frans S (2023-09-11 12:42:54+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
A: E: Inaccurate mapped and / or not squared.
G: include the shadow of a building in the mapping.
Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141107879
Frans S (2023-09-11 12:41:32+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 
Please use the Bing Imagery as well. Very detailed 
Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141107899
VictorIE (2023-10-26 06:28:05+00:00): Hi,

Welcome to OSM. Thank you for mapping,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/572926875

Just be careful when mapping objects to check if they are mapped already. :) In this case it would be appropriate to merge / delete the node that I had original mapped, seeing as you have mapped more detail.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10119259386
Frans S (2023-09-11 12:39:58+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 
Please use the Bing Imagery as well. Very sharp and detailed.
Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141108168
Frans S (2023-09-11 12:38:29+00:00): Hello. See my comments on your other changeset.
Same issues.
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141108171
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:30:03+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365385
Frans S (2023-09-11 12:37:16+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 
Please use the Bing Imagery as well. Very sharp and detailed,
Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141108227
Frans S (2023-09-11 12:35:25+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
A: E: Inaccurate mapped and / or not squared.
C: Collecting multiple buildings and mapping them as 1 building. 
You actually mapped 2 buildings as 1 building

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141108261
HellMap (2023-09-11 18:21:05+00:00): Sveiki!

Kas īsti bija domāts uzlikt https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1206865101 ? retail jau nu tas nebūs :)
Reinis Bērziņš (2023-09-11 18:30:44+00:00): Tas ir degvielas uzpildes stacijas ūdens rezervuārs dzēšanas darbiem. Te ir ieteikts visu teritoriju apzīmēt ar landuse=retail, tāpēc arī pieliku šim objektam tādu. Diemžēl "access" tagu nav pieņemts uzlikt vienu pašu. Ja ir kāda labāka ideja, tad nomainīšu.
HellMap (2023-09-11 18:45:48+00:00): Skaidrs. Neesmu citur redzējis speciāli uzliktus tegus tādām teritorijām. Parasti gan tie ir pašā teritorijā un ar to nav tādas problēmas. Nedomāju, ka OSM vispār ir kaut kāds tegs tam. Nu laikam jau var uzskatīt, ka tas ir DUS daļa. Es gan tad pieliktu note=* paskaidrojumu kāpēc šeit ir retail, jo agri vai vēlu kāds cits to pašu pamanīs un nesapratīs.
Reinis Bērziņš (2023-09-18 19:43:41+00:00): Es pieliku note, kā ieteici. Vēl varētu pielikt utility=water, bet utility viens pats neeksistē bez landuse vai amenity. Diemžēl landuse vispārīgie varianti ir maz (commercial un retail, kas ieteikts DUS gadījumā). Manuprāt, access=* ir ir ļoti svarīgs tags, lai cilvēki saprastu, vai tur vispār var un drīkst iekļūt pa vārtiņiem vai caurumiem žogā, bet, vēl  jo vairāk, nenožogotā teritorijā. Piemēram, landuse=residential apzīmē gan brīvi pieejamus daudzstāvu māju pagalmus, gan ļoti privātus privātmājas pagalmus, pat daudzviet veselas apkaimes, lai gan pēdējais gadījums skaitās nepareiza prakse. Ar žogiem bieži vien nepietiek, ja žogu ir ļoti daudz, sazaroti, nolaistā stāvoklī, neveido apļveida noslēgtu teritoriju. Access atšķirībā no žogiem rada momentālu vizuālu skaidrību, ka tur nav vērts mēģināt atrast eju cauri (protams, tas atkarīgs no kartes stila).
HellMap (2023-09-18 20:10:15+00:00): Jā, es redzēju izmaiņu. Es neko labāku neesmu izdomājis. Tas ļoti specifisks gadījums, ja mērķis ir tieši laukumam iedot access tegu.

Personīgi, es neaizraujos ar access vairāk kā žogs/vārti ar pareizu access. Principā jau var likt visām teritorijām to, bet populārās kartes to pagaidām nezīmē. Maršrutētāji arī to ignorē ceļiem bez access, kas iet pa tādām teritorijām, tāpēc tik un tā jānorāda access uz pašiem ceļiem pagaidām. Varbūt kādreiz...
Frans S (2023-09-11 12:33:56+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141108425
Frans S (2023-09-11 12:32:30+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141108694
trigpoint (2023-09-17 16:56:51+00:00): What does the camra tag mean?

Cheers Phil
Eliiia (2023-09-17 20:24:07+00:00): Refers to whether the pub is in the CAMRA Good Beer guide, see under additional tags in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dpub
trigpoint (2023-09-17 20:51:22+00:00): Got it, in GBG
trigpoint (2023-09-17 21:12:50+00:00): I think it is more of a foodie pub than a restaurant, however dogs=unleashed seems strange where food is served.
Eliiia (2023-09-20 20:15:48+00:00): I was unsure of whether to say it's a foodie pub or a restaurant 😅, most tables tend to order drinks however I'd say a solid 90% of them come with the intention to eat. Dogs are indeed allowed unleashed inside and outside, although dogs aren't allowed at all in 2 of the 4 open rooms inside.
gscholz (2023-09-14 06:38:49+00:00): Hi fumireko,
this changeset has create several significant errors regarding self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-49.42298&lat=-25.29383&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=141108892

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
fumireko (2023-09-14 10:50:42+00:00): Fixed in changeset 141251533, please review:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141251533
Frans S (2023-09-11 12:31:05+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141108911
habi (2023-09-11 17:46:50+00:00): I would go as far as tagging this not as `sport=climbing` but https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dclimbing_adventure
captain_slow (2023-09-11 20:39:54+00:00): Ja, das ist ist definitiv besser. Hatte irgendwie verpasst dass es das so gibt. Ich habe es ensprechend nagepasst und auch gleich noch den Namen korrigiert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141133013
habi (2023-09-12 17:31:15+00:00): 👍🏼
emersonveenstra (2023-09-11 16:14:06+00:00): Hi,

You broke the map with this changeset by dragging the off ramp across the highway.

The editor warned you of this when you saved the changeset, please always look at those warnings to prevent breaking the map again, thanks!
emersonveenstra (2023-09-13 16:51:32+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141220584 for dubious sources, misuse of the toll key, and not following the Organized Editing Guidelines
Frans S (2023-09-11 12:29:46+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
A: E: Inaccurate mapped and / or not squared.
D: Connecting nodes of buildings to other buildings or features like roads and residential areas.
 This area is rather difficult to map. Please select an easier task to start with.
Even experienced mappers see this as a challenge.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141109297
Frans S (2023-09-11 12:25:22+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 
Please use the Bing Imagery for a better view.
Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141109643
G_P_J (2023-09-12 08:40:15+00:00): Dzięki za poprawkę. Niestety przy dużej ilości obiektów czasem trafi się coś wyburzonego, co nadal jest widoczne na podkładach.
adas (2023-09-12 09:00:43+00:00): Te wyburzenia były widoczne na podkładzie geoportalu.
Kovoschiz (2023-09-11 14:36:14+00:00): 1. The issue of `=motorway_junction` on restricted lane change braided ramps is quite uncertain. I discussed with Apple or some company once before. It is desirable not to duplicate it, while in this case North Point on-slip needs to be considered too. Now I imagine some form of `destination:*=` on the point of diverging may help. But you have already added `junction:ref=` (regardless of whether this is the best solution), so the `=motorway_junction` isn't absolutely necessary. 
2. Although I don't agree with it fully, you are supposed keep the separate `highway=speed_camera` next to the road. The `type=enforcement` is sufficient to show what road section is being monitored.
Patrickov (2023-09-11 23:39:36+00:00): This change has broken at least 5 bus routes.