piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2023-12-19 19:43:54+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback  Lijkt mij oke zo. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-12-23 16:13:33+00:00): Tag Fabian..  Ein Weihnachtsmarkt ist doch nicht das ganzen Jahr hier?

Besser löschen denke ich. Du auch?

Gruss..
eggie
Fabian007 (2023-12-28 20:13:26+00:00): Hallo eggie,
Ja, das denke ich auch genauso. Ich werde diesen Knoten entfernen, wenn es okay wäre.

Aber drotzdem wünsche ich dir einen wunderschönen Abend noch!

MFG Fabianbuecheler
eggie (2023-12-28 20:17:51+00:00): 👍
map per (2023-12-29 20:08:09+00:00): @Fabianbuescheler:
Für Weihnachtsmärkte gibt es das xmas Tagging Schema. Das ist hier (1) beschrieben.

(1) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:xmas:feature
eggie (2023-12-29 20:14:37+00:00): Hi.... Neu für mich.

Es ist möglich die Daten zu ergänzen mit zb xmas:day_date=2016-11-28/2016-12-23

Gruss..
eggie
Fabian007 (2024-01-02 15:24:35+00:00): Hallo mal per, 
Erst einmal ein Frohes neues Jahr dir noch!
Darf ich diesen Link als PDF Datei abspeichern, und auf meinen Kindle senden, sodass ich darauf lesen kann?

Danke in voraus!

MFG Fabianbuecheler
Fabian007 (2024-01-02 15:26:37+00:00): Hallo eggie, 
Erst einmal ein frohes neues Jahr dir noch!
Wie geht das den überhaubt?

Danke und einen schönen Abend dir noch!

MFG Fabianbuecheler
map per (2024-01-07 12:00:57+00:00): >> Wie geht das den überhaubt?

Wenn du ein Objekt im ID Editor bearbeitest kannst du links in der Objektübersicht den Abschnitt "Eigenschaften" ausklappen. Dann siehst du alle Tags, so wie sie in der Datenbank gespeichert sind. Dort kannst du dann auch z.B. den Tag xmas:day_date=... eintragen.

Ich hoffe, das hilft dir weiter, ansonsten bitte noch mal spezifischer nachfragen.

VG
map per
Fabian007 (2024-01-21 19:17:35+00:00): Hallo Map Per,

Vielen Dank, für die Nachricht.

Okay, dann weiß ich in Zukunft bescheid.

Ich wünsche dir noch einen schönen Sonntag Abend dir noch!

MFG Fabianbuecheler
misterte (2023-12-19 20:24:45+00:00): Hi,
bist Du Dir da sicher das 104607750 die Nummer 16 ist, laut ALKIS ist das die 16b
eggie (2023-12-19 20:20:25+00:00): Oke Marc...  Nu liggen de wegen tenminste niet op elkaar.
Wat er allemaal komt kijken bij een MTB pad vind je hier. 
Wat leesvoer https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Mountain_biking

Dan wordt het voor de kaartenmakers duidelijk dat het om een MTB route gaat. 
Bv moeilijkheidsgraad e.d. kun je dan toevoegen.

Verder staat het getags als roundtrip, maar ik  zie zo snel in het relatievenster geen roundtrip.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-12-19 20:24:58+00:00): Het 'foutje' heb ik eruit gehaald. Het is nu een roundtrip. Er zat een loos stukje bij pand nr 31.

Nog een 'dingetje' Je route loopt over wegen met access=private en zal dus niet routeren.
Dan zou er bicycle=permissive kunnen worden toegevoegd.
.. en dekt de vlag van de naam MTB track NK 2019 nog steeds de lading?
Groet
eggie
Marc Dewever (2023-12-19 20:45:24+00:00): Hallo Eggie,
De access bicycles heb ik aangepast.
De MTB route is local bekend als MTB NK2019. De NK's 2020 en 2021, ook hier gehouden waren alweer anders van layout. Nu hebben we de paaltjes weer geupdate en willen we de huidige route ook online kloppend hebben. Vandaar...
eggie (2023-12-19 20:56:56+00:00): Oke... het ziet er nu netjes uit.
Glassman (2023-12-21 03:09:28+00:00): I don't typically add highway=crossing on service roads, but it doesn't hurt. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dcrossing for more detail
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145304639
tbi1233 (2023-12-19 22:02:14+00:00): I confirmed that the road markings have only a bus lane in the other direction, but some drivers don't respect that. I'll revert this.
rowcherryrow (2023-12-20 20:47:19+00:00): Hello tbi1233, thank you for confirming and updating this. Happy mapping!
Robert Whittaker (2023-12-22 18:04:40+00:00): In this changeset you added an AED at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11432902393 . However, there was already an AED mapped by the village hall at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10814728047 .

Do you know if there are indeed tow AEDs this close together? Or is there just one, and if so is your location the right one?
Yorvik Prestigitator (2023-12-25 18:55:05+00:00): oh I didn't spot that on the map, no the defibrillator is by the cafe entrance not by the fire escape
I will fix it
Yorvik Prestigitator (2023-12-25 18:58:04+00:00): Maybe someone mistook one of the safety lights on the fire escape for a defibrillator box?
1998alexkane (2023-12-30 16:57:59+00:00): I think they should be highway=footway, highway=living_street implies it is still constructed as a street imo, whereas these are simply named footpaths
BPTT (2024-01-18 03:07:24+00:00): Good point. Thanks!
eggie (2023-12-19 20:34:11+00:00): Comment moet zijn adres hersteld
Đuro Jiří (2023-12-20 18:13:51+00:00): Ciao fayor,
Lidl non occupa intera area, però solo uno edificio, come ho mappato io.
eggie (2023-12-20 09:29:09+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Rockedf (2023-12-19 23:23:39+00:00): Hola, si fueras tan amable de explicarme el motivo al borrar los bitcoin tags de este nodo.

Acabo de conversar con el encargado y no ha autorizado a borrarlos. 

Saludos.
eggie (2023-12-20 09:43:31+00:00): Dag Marc,

Lijkt me oke... Nog wel roundtrip MTB-routerelatie  Windraak in de juiste volgorde gezet. 
gr eggie
Marc Dewever (2023-12-20 10:29:05+00:00): Dank je wel.
Groet, Marc
Mingwei (2024-04-10 16:55:02+00:00): Note that `tactile_paving=yes` is almost always wrong on US crossings. It is `yes` on crossings that have tactile paving thru the road, such as in JP: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Tactile_paving_on_crossing_ja.jpg

In the US we only have tactile paving on curb cuts `kerb=flush; tactile_paving=yes`
CurlingMan13 (2023-12-20 02:35:51+00:00): Hi again.  It's me again.  You're still continuing to make mapping errors despite multiple comments regarding the errors.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145009342

You were previously blocked for this exact thing, but you continue to do the same thing.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15082
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145307074
CurlingMan13 (2023-12-20 02:38:01+00:00): Why did you delete these features?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145307225
MxxCon (2023-12-26 04:25:34+00:00): Hello.
You keep deleting and recreating features with identical tags. Why are you doing this? What kind of analysis involves deleting valid OSM features?
When you needlessly OSM features, you also delete their history, which can be useful in the future to refer to such an element.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145307458
Mertmert (2023-12-27 21:32:58+00:00): Hey MxxCon!

I shared a bit more about this in my previous reply, but to recap super briefly (and add some more context):

I am currently developing an asset list with counts of all the features mapped on OSM by our fellows (interns) as part of my organization (BetaNYC)'s Mapping for Equity Project. As part of this, I am exporting features out of OSM, and the features I've re-mapped are area features mapped by our fellows with wayIDs that have problematically been exported as line features rather than as areas.
(part1; part 2 below)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145307458
Mertmert (2023-12-27 21:35:48+00:00): (part 2; part 1 above)
After briefly investigating, I found little major difference outside of the boundaries of some of these features having been fused/overlapping with those of adjacent areas. Since I haven't found a clear explanation of why these wayIDs are exported under the wrong categoriy or how to correct that, to prevent potential data losses I've decided to simply renew these few problematic wayIDs by re-mapping said features as areas. I have only done this for features mapped by our fellows, and the majority have had very few edits, if any, by other users (and most did not exist on OSM before being added by our fellows)--which hopefully limits the loss of information as much as possible. 
(part 2; part 3 below)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145307458
Mertmert (2023-12-27 21:36:53+00:00): (part 3; part 2 above)
Since we plan to develop this process of exporting into a toolkit that can be shared with other nonprofit/advocacy groups and stakeholders, we want to make sure that at least the features mapped by our fellows can be exported properly.
                                                                                                                                  I hope this helped to clarify my actions! I have largely finished re-mapping; I think there is maybe one more feature with fused boundaries mapped by one of our fellows that I will likely re-map, but outside of that this should (hopefully) be a one-off thing :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145307458
MxxCon (2024-01-02 01:10:37+00:00): OSM doesn't have a different elements for lines or areas. It's just assumed that certain closed ways with certain tag combinations are treated as areas.

It sounds like it'd be more reliable/durable if you'd look into figuring out what your code is doing wrong rather than having to edit OSM data, because this becomes borderline https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
richlv (2023-12-21 01:32:42+00:00): Vai Staļģenes skolas ēkā tiešām ir tikai pamatskola?
No https://www.stalgenesskola.lv/lv/kontakti/ un https://www.jelgavasnovads.lv/lv/strukturvieniba/stalgenes-pamatskola-0 izskatās, ka tur tomēr ir arī vidusskola.
Syl (2023-12-19 22:11:13+00:00): Effectivement tu avais supprimé un nœud de la route. J'ai annulé la suppression.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-12-31 17:16:02+00:00): por favor, adicione o tipo de superficie nessas vias que voce vem criando.
Minh Nguyen (2024-05-27 17:54:11+00:00): Did you use any sources besides Bing aerial imagery (which hasn’t been updated yet)? I’d like to update the lane counts and such, but I haven’t come across recent enough imagery, and ODOT’s SLDs haven’t been updated yet either.
Joseph R P (2024-05-27 18:28:49+00:00): I've been relying on the Sentinel Hub EO Browser which can show very recent imagery but with a very low resolution. I'm still able to make out which roads do and don't exist anymore and which of them are under construction, but lane markings and finer details like that are not at all decipherable from the imagery you're provided, so I tend to leave that out for someone who would know.
Lejun (2023-12-27 21:51:51+00:00): Mollo sur la clé name, c'est pas fait pour y mettre tout et n'importe quoi, y a des clés plus appropriées décrites sur le wiki
Stadtigel (2024-01-03 15:48:26+00:00): This is the right place to continue this discussion: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144910854

Hallo Vanja!

Thank you for your answer! As far as I know it is possible to use both Latin and Cyrillic letters in Serbia, isn't it? Using tag "int_name" would be a possible compromise. But also the using of the tag "nat_name" for the Cyrillic letters would be possible.
Please read also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:superroute, including the example. The addition of “E4” would be important to indicate that it belongs to the corresponding “superroute”. 

With friendly greetings
Stadtigel from Germany
IgorEliezer (2023-12-20 06:39:57+00:00): Olá, peço por favor não deletar o uso do solo de elementos que existem. O terreno existe e é de uso de comércio varejista, e o contorno é do cadastro da prefeitura. Obrigado.
AjBelnuovo (2023-12-20 13:52:44+00:00): Além do restaurante o que a mais para que seja uma área de varejo e negócios ?
IgorEliezer (2023-12-20 18:18:16+00:00): * Como landuse=retail: tudo o que é  comércio varejista, loja que vende produtos ou serviços a consumidores. Ver: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Tag:landuse=retail
Exemplo: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1232578028

* Como landuse=commercial: tudo o que é escritório, centro empresarial e de negócios e bancos. Ver: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Tag:landuse%3Dcommercial
Exemplo: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1176221214

Não precisa de um contorno por lote. Pode ser um contorno englobando vários lotes ou área onde o uso é predominantemente de comércio varejista ou área empresarial.
VictorIE (2023-12-22 21:35:30+00:00): Thank you for the mapping. :)
Glassman (2023-12-20 01:02:08+00:00): I would appreciate it if you could leave somewhat more information in your changeset comment. They don't have to be long. For example added sidewalks and swimming pools
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145309660
CurlingMan13 (2023-12-20 02:40:25+00:00): What's up with doing a mass deletion of features?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145310241
AwFi (2023-12-19 23:29:03+00:00): CORRECTION OF THE DESCRIPTION
added track ref to some stations between Schio and Cavazzale
Marek-M (2025-02-19 11:39:47+00:00): Cześć, czy tagi toll=no i trolley_wire=no dodawałeś z jakiegoś konkretnego powodu? Domyślnie drogi takie wartości przyjmują jako `no`, więc są nadmiarowe i niepotrzebne.

W Słupsku nie ma w ogóle trakcji trolejbusowej (likwidacja w 1999r. wg Wikipedii), więc skąd pomysł na dodanie trolley_wire=no do drogi?
WTGZ_ (2025-02-19 14:26:14+00:00): Cześć, ja tego nie dodawałem, chyba że przez jakiś totalny przypadek. Sam wiem, że trolejbusów już dawno nie ma.
WTGZ_ (2025-02-19 14:35:33+00:00): Hej, dobra już sobie przypomniałem. Zapoznawałem się wtedy ze znacznikami i ich nie usunąłem. Już wszystko poprawione.
Marek-M (2025-02-19 15:26:09+00:00): Super, dzięki za reakcję :)
fortera_au (2023-12-20 01:14:28+00:00): Hey, it looks like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/301772546 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/301772545 are still named Gundy Street, you might need to correct there too!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145310501
emersonveenstra (2023-12-21 11:39:13+00:00): Hi there,

This changeset seems to have really mangled https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1152257846, if you look at the changeset here https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=145310998&relations=true you can get a better picture of it. Could you go back and fix that? Thanks!
czebureks (2023-12-20 00:14:10+00:00): Rejon ul. Kampinoskiej - landuse, infrastruktura, bariery
PierreV79 (2023-12-26 11:33:01+00:00): bonjour, j'ai un fort doute sur le branchement électrique pour Chemin : Aire Camping Car La Roussille (1232556730)  a cet endroit exact en bord de chemin de halage. Est-ce que c'est un projet? avez-vous une source pour confirmer votre contribution? merci d 'avance
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2023-12-26 17:56:19+00:00): https://www.aireparkreservation.com/aires-camping-cars/nouvelle-aquitaine/deux-sevres/niort-la-roussille indicates a caravan_site with power_supply at this location but after studying mapillary images I agree that there are no services here. In fact there is a motorhome on Mapillary but there are no signs or markings indicating a caravan_site. I am not sure this should be marked as a caravan_site at all. But I updated it to reflect that there are no services.
PierreV79 (2023-12-26 19:52:44+00:00): Merci pour la réponse. Malheuresement la source que vous utilisez n'est pas compatible avec la licence OSM. Merci de stoper l'utilisation de ce site pour vos prochaines contributions... et aussi de revenir en arrière pour vos contributions déjà réalisés .
Ensuite, si sur la vue mapillary un camping-car est présent cela ne veut pas dire que c'est une aire d'accueil, et je confirme après passage cet après midi sur place c'est un simple parking uniquement pour petites voitures (compliqué d'y faire un demi-tour avec un van ou camping car...). La borne d'électricité et eau  est accessible uniquement pour les bateaux a l'aide de clefs qui sont fournies par la capitainerie de Niort ou Marans. Attention aux traductions quand vous contribuez dans un autre langue que la votre...
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2023-12-30 15:20:08+00:00): I do not use it as a source for edits. This was just one of several sites mentioning this motorhome/parking space. But when reading the comments on the net it is clear that it is not at at all a motorhome site. Thank you for checking it.
MxxCon (2023-12-26 04:37:05+00:00): Hello.
Could you elaborate why did you delete building tag here?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145312291
Robin Zyx (2023-12-26 15:03:46+00:00): I have no idea how that happened. I certainly did not mean to do so.

OSM was acting a little odd for me last week, in ways that I can't begin to explain. This must be some extra weird result of that.
Robin Zyx (2023-12-28 17:12:33+00:00): MxxCon, I'm trying to figure out how to revert the building deletion, and it looks like a hairball. Is this something you know how to do?
MxxCon (2023-12-28 17:22:12+00:00): I fixed it in https://osmcha.org/changesets/145629828/. This might need a couple of minutes before you can see the actual changes.
Robin Zyx (2023-12-28 21:08:18+00:00): Thank you!

Due to tiling and timing, the building returned in increments. The first bit not long after you edited, and the rest of it sometime later.
nevw (2023-12-20 02:24:40+00:00): Hi, the building tag is used to map the house footprint and not the land plot.
The owners name is not used in osm and a name is only for houses that do have a name such as some heritage houses.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names
nevw (2023-12-20 02:31:27+00:00): You could add other useful information such as mapped here so that car navigation apps can locate your address https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/693134235
DressyPear4 (2023-12-20 15:16:42+00:00): Revertido vandalismo!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145312608
Baloo Uriza (2023-12-20 17:29:42+00:00): You may wish to force an upload just before or just after taking a flight in the future.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145312609
wegerje (2024-07-28 19:18:00+00:00): This informal social trail is partially maintained by wegerje . When not maintained it becomes lost at points by vegetation. Wegerje uses rough phone gps to locate the trail as exactly as possible.
Trail_Caretaker (2024-07-28 22:04:43+00:00): Ok.  Thanks for the info.
FYI, I can't see the trail or trail section that you are referring to on OSM ID Editor, it only shows me the changeset rectangle that is about 10 square miles.
treestryder (2024-09-05 03:43:22+00:00): It shows the entire area the edit affected. Down below, it lists the objects. affected Could click through the ways to see which was mentioned.

Another option would be a tool that shows the edits graphically, like OsmCha.
https://osmcha.org/changesets/145312706?filters=%7B%22date__gte%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%22%22%2C%22value%22%3A%22%22%7D%5D%2C%22ids%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%22145312706%22%2C%22value%22%3A%22145312706%22%7D%5D%7D

By making smaller, more succinct edits, they would be easier to reference and discuss.

If I had to guess, I would suspect they mean this, after the entire length of the trail was also labeled as a ford.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1092786976/history
wegerje (2024-09-05 08:43:10+00:00): Yes the guess above from history is correct. Just two small segments of two nodes each are supposed to be fords. The rest of the trail is just trail.
tastrax (2023-12-20 04:23:36+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
tastrax (2023-12-20 04:23:55+00:00): PS - welcome to OSM!
goldyatbrunny (2023-12-20 04:32:44+00:00): Thank you - rookie error!
tastrax (2023-12-20 06:05:04+00:00): Don't worry - plenty of us oldies forget from time to time!
CurlingMan13 (2023-12-20 02:41:50+00:00): I get the buildings weren't square, but why did you delete them?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145313042
CurlingMan13 (2023-12-20 03:24:53+00:00): Changeset reverted due to unwarranted deletion.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145314039
KoiAndBlueBird (2023-12-21 03:09:00+00:00): If the shop is gone, please delete the entire node.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145313162
tyfi (2023-12-20 02:25:56+00:00): I extended the relation west to Bowmansville, as it was incomplete.
tyfi (2023-12-20 02:26:28+00:00): I also added a missing concurrency between D and Y just south of Whiteman Air Force Base.
tyfi (2023-12-20 02:27:23+00:00): I also reworked an intersection just north of Missouri State Fair, and I added footways in the process.
tyfi (2023-12-20 02:28:01+00:00): I also added a missing concurrency between Y and 23.
arctic-rocinante (2024-07-13 23:36:08+00:00): Hi there, what is this attraction supposed to be? It’d be great if you could set “name” field when adding these, as otherwise it’s very unclear what they are :)
MxxCon (2023-12-26 04:41:21+00:00): Hello.
Rather than writing that as text description, why not add entrance nodes at appropriate locations?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145313730
IraGersh (2023-12-26 14:21:49+00:00): I didn't know about entrance nodes. And I wondered if it should be considered as two separate bathrooms, each of which would by definition have separate entrances.
Zandu (2023-12-20 05:06:58+00:00): moving tags from node to area for better accuracy.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145314265
tyfi (2023-12-20 03:46:02+00:00): This is in St. Clair County, Missouri.
slice0 (2023-12-20 04:10:56+00:00): I am putting this back to residential, please consider opening a discussion before creating secondary roads as they impact routing significantly
fortera_au (2023-12-20 04:12:58+00:00): Hi, this isn't a residential section and secondary matches the road use.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145314458
fortera_au (2023-12-20 04:14:46+00:00): Plus, we don't choose highway tags based on routing, we choose them based on the nature of the road.
slice0 (2023-12-20 04:19:53+00:00): your interpretation does not make a difference to facts, unless we just change the wiki to what "fortera_au thinks is right"
fortera_au (2023-12-20 04:22:49+00:00): My interpretation of what? Ground truth shows that this road is not a residential road, and considering it sits between two roads classed as secondary with no actual difference between those two roads and this one, residential makes absolutely no sense. 

You could make an argument that this (and Grand Trunkway) would be better classed as tertiary, but definitely not residential or unclassified.