piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
gogorm (2023-06-23 22:39:59+00:00): I'm not challenging your choice to map the footpath as a separate way. I respect that your approach is one of several acceptable approaches.

1. I don't see why OSM cannot accommodate mapping for both vulnerable and non-vulnerable classes of footpath users.

If you feel that a connection which somebody added between a footpath and road is unsafe for use by a subset of footpath users, then the solution is to tag it as such, rather than delete it.

I imagine that tags such as https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wheelchair and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tactile_paving and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:kerb and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lit would be useful when it comes to placing importance on the safety of vulnerable users?

For example if you deem an otherwise valid connection that somebody added unsafe to use because it involves a raised kerb, the solution is to map the raised kerb rather than deleting the connection.

2. In the example journeys I gave, there are crossings (with dished kerbs too) at the t-junctions of roads along the route (see See https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10754018268 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10754018234 for example of such locations), but you neglected to connect your footpath with the road at those locations.

It is when connections such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1180320076 are deleted that the separately mapped footpaths become the only option for the router. Consequently, if the separately mapped footpath isn't connected to the road at the applicable pedestrian crossing points along the way, we end up with these convoluted pedestrian navigation routes.

Have a good night.
datendelphin (2023-06-21 17:30:15+00:00): MF? MF what? Please try to write meaningful changeset text
VA00 (2024-03-25 15:28:07+00:00): Czy to nie jest przejazd rowerowy? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1004726931
InsertUser (2023-06-24 01:46:35+00:00): Is the new road to Williams Town passable now?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137611810
jhalpin (2023-06-24 10:39:46+00:00): It has been for at least 6 months.
MxxCon (2023-06-27 23:33:20+00:00): Hello.
What kind of tourist attraction is this lighthouse feature?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137611856
RicoElectrico (2023-06-21 17:06:32+00:00): Cześć, jak rozumiem remiza już jest zbudowana? Bo na mapie jest jeszcze oznaczony teren budowy ;)
Langlaeufer (2023-07-12 10:35:01+00:00): Wo steht denn hier ein Sackgassenschild?
Langlaeufer (2023-07-12 10:39:53+00:00): Ok. hab es entdeckt und zurechtgeschoben.
VictorIE (2026-02-11 18:15:21+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/560823213

I'm going to change operator="Lisburn and Castlereagh City Centre" to "Lisburn and Castlereagh City Council". :)
ramthelinefeed (2026-02-11 18:18:50+00:00): Worst typo ever lol
NorthCrab_upload (2023-06-21 16:30:14+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/224267943

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
user_5359 (2023-06-23 06:29:28+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please take a look on http://www.osm.org/node/5899745085. What is the mean of the tag Geosito = Regionale?
martina131313 (2023-06-23 15:08:42+00:00): Thankyou! 
Recently i mapped capri’s geosites  for ISPRA’s national inventory.
They attributed different “classess” of interest (such as local, regional and national) to highlight the actual value and recognition of the landform on a national scale.
Please, correct me if needed or suggest what i can to to improve my addings.
Kindest regards,
M.N.V.
user_5359 (2023-06-25 06:03:16+00:00): I have inquired about the possibilities. As a rule, we do not record subjective classification of objects. But it would be fine if you used British English and lower case letters for the key and the value.
Oh, what I overlooked in the example: the tag "elevation"="1 m s.l.m. circa" is also not a known key and the value is hardly evaluable. Please have a look at the wiki page for the key ele (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ele).
map per (2023-06-22 06:59:54+00:00): Hello Jennifer Byishimo,

the areas you added are buildings rather than residential areas. Please fix that.

Thanks and best regards
map per
SLMapper (2024-04-11 14:26:01+00:00): Hi SunnyIsland10, in this area there is esri 07/2023 imagery available, please do not rely on outdated Bing imagery (2014-2021).

According to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gas_Interconnector_Greece%E2%80%93Bulgaria the Bing imagery more precisely is from 2020-2022
SunnyIsland10 (2024-04-12 16:13:47+00:00): Greetings SLMapper,

Thank you for the information regarding the imagery in this area. I see that you have updated the geometry of this track highway to match newer imagery which I appreciate.

Have a good day!
SunnyIsland10
Hungerburg (2023-06-22 21:36:51+00:00): Dieser Edit lag so sehr daneben, dass ich das umgehend korrigieren musste. Aus 30 m sind da 66 geworden und aus 19 gleich 80. Disastermapping oder Mappingdisaster? Trotzdem vielen Dank, andernfalls hätte ich wohl auf aktuelle Daten gewartet, so konnte ich meine Schätzung einbringen.
Leo Slager (2023-06-21 21:10:53+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Leo Slager (2023-06-28 10:07:09+00:00): Hi Lu7217,
The beachclub was already on the map.
I renmoved the duplicate name.

Try to resolve the warnings before an upload to the server.
habi (2023-07-18 08:48:58+00:00): Ciao RogerMarcel
The road is still tagged with `access=no`, should that not be removed?
Greetings,
habi
RogerMarcel (2023-07-18 15:22:52+00:00): Yes you are correct. The access is now open so this can be removed.
habi (2023-07-18 16:53:02+00:00): Thanks, changed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138679132
Nakaner (2023-06-22 15:17:37+00:00): Hallo,

herzlich willkommen bei OSM.

Betreiber sollte den Betreiber des Wegweisers beschreiben. "Gemeinde" ist da etwas unspezifisch", da nicht eindeutig ist, welche Gemeinde gemeint ist. Bitte verwende in solchen Fällen die korrektere Bezeichen "Gemeinde Wasauchimmerdorf" oder "Stadt Wasauchimmerstadt".

Gib auch bitte an, ob es ein Rad- oder Wanderwegweiser ist (heißt im iD-Editor "Aktivität").

Viele Grüße

Michael
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137614774
archpdx (2023-06-21 21:58:00+00:00): Hi,
I noticed this changeset removes valid turn lane information.

For example, (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/971874582), (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/971874584), and (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/971874583), all of which had correct lane/turn lane information, were merged with adjacent ways.
tms13 (2023-06-23 09:30:46+00:00): This change has seriously broken the heath area relation (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13417952).  Can you fix that?
Jan Olieslagers (2023-06-22 10:17:18+00:00): The aerodrome in node 860532695 has now been described in fine detail in way 1184013656. To avoid double information, I intend to remove this node entry. Comments welcome!

BTW would anybody know if this recreational aerodrome will continue to operate if once the new big airport opens - which was scheduled for June 15th, I think?
Jan Olieslagers (2023-06-28 09:14:55+00:00): No comments after a week, I remove it now.
CurlingMan13 (2023-09-18 21:34:46+00:00): User readded these no longer existing features.  I have gone through and removed the ones that don't exist.
OddlyAngled (2023-06-22 02:34:18+00:00): this used to be an old trail that was still serviceable as a use trail.. has it been destroyed in recent times?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137616362
hrhino (2023-06-21 20:24:30+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OSM!

A few things:
- The fact that the campsite is tagged tourism=camp_site means that you shouldn't need "(camp site)" in the name.
- charge=* has a special format so that computers can read it (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:charge), so here "15 USD/person/night"
- Telephone numbers should use the international format, which in the US means starting with "+1"
- You seem to have removed highway=secondary from VT125 by mistake.

I've touched those up for you but I just wanted to let you know.

Happy mapping!
InsertUser (2023-06-24 02:37:26+00:00): What basis do you have for the name "Owl's Hole Road"?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137617217
burrscurr (2023-09-03 15:04:45+00:00): cc https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3869122
PabloArias (2023-06-21 18:54:35+00:00): La calle Miguel Delives es la que empieza después del cruce con la San Cristóbal de Entreviñas.
Black_Diamond (2023-06-21 21:48:30+00:00): Thank you for confirming and fixing the issue.
CurlingMan13 (2023-08-01 16:45:34+00:00): Features that no longer exist, like the railway/tramway down the middle of the road that has been ripped out, replaced and overbuilt do not belong on OSM, but instead belong on OHM.

These features should be moved to OHM and removed to OSM.  OSM is only what currently exists, not what may have existed at one point in time.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Nonexistent_features
Ktr101 (2023-08-10 01:16:43+00:00): That is fine, although is there a way to do that without losing all of the mapping?
CurlingMan13 (2023-08-10 01:36:54+00:00): Best option is to get it added on OpenHistoricalMaps (OHM).  I believe the best way to do it is to do it in JOSM.  I think there is a wiki page on how to do it.  I am not well-versed on OHM and have only moved one rail over on Staten Island, but I did that manually.

Start and end dates can also be added, adding even more control because the lifecycle can even be changed from "proposed" to "construction" to "active" to "disused" to "abandoned" then "razed" and finally removed all together.  The timeline can then be scrubbed and the status change can be viewed over time whoch is even cooler!
Ktr101 (2023-08-17 00:47:31+00:00): Oh my...that will be an undertaking. Rail is interesting though in that a lot of the time, it is hard to tell if any trace is left. The route you pointed out is a bit different since it was a streetcar line, so as long as this should not break anything, I will look at it in the coming weeks to see what other projects I can move over, as well.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-06-22 14:21:39+00:00): Hi, since you are a new mapper, make sure you aren't confusing compacted and gravel surfaces. Gravel is loose rocks, in Estonia compacted roads are more common with SOME loose rocks, but most of the surface being pressed though still not very flat.

But it may be a gravel road, writing just in case.
hoderlump (2023-06-23 08:53:16+00:00): Hi qqqqqqq! Thanks for the hint. I am not 100% sure about this. The road is compacted and has a good foundation and no holes. But there‘s very rough gravel there…. I have a small video which shows it, the hole way is like that. Please correct my entries, if this is not gravel: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1PmPH8Gw71Vgi32rzdlHXUQo2-L_vIL37/view?usp=drivesdk

Thx!!
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-06-24 17:10:03+00:00): Thanks for the video! 
This is a compacted road. Some loose gravel on top of it, but probably bikeble without the bike trailer? 

See example photos here
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface%253Dgravel
Gravel roads have loose rocks which are impossible to ride on with narrow slick tires and challenging with wide tires. (now that I think of it's funny that gravel bikes won't be able to ride comfortably on what OSM considers gravel)

I've also added smoothness=bad.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-06-24 17:11:29+00:00): accidentally broke the link, fixed:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface%3Dgravel
jacobwhall (2023-12-21 01:12:59+00:00): Hi @Damiles, it looks like you made a few erroneous edits in this area back in June. I've reverted them in changeset #145351518. Please let me know if you'd like to discuss this further. Thanks!

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145351518
literan (2023-06-22 18:18:35+00:00): а здесь зачем удалили украинское название, которое с 2013 года висит? опять вандалите исподтишка?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2421978
J_Doe (2023-06-22 18:29:18+00:00): Исподтишка - это когда нагадил под дверью и скрылся. А здесь никто не скрывается. Зачем здесь нужно это название? Они, кажется, Пушкина тоже запретили.
silversurfer83 (2023-06-23 07:59:56+00:00): Moin Puffin No 23 :)

du hast darum gebeten, dass sich jemand deine Änderung ansieht. Ich mach das mal und lass meine Kommentare hier:

- Wegverläufe und Sportanlagen sehen soweit ganz gut aus. Bei der Weitsprunganlange hättest du noch die Taste "Q" betätigen können. Die macht ein ausgewähltes Objekt schön rechtwinklig.

- Beim Dorfplatz selbst hast du die Eigenschaft "place=island" ausgewählt. Ich habe da zunächst einen Park raus gemacht, bis ich den optimalen tag gefunden habe, da es ja offensichtlich keine Insel ist. Kann passieren, ist kein Problem.

- am Südende des Platzes ist für den Weg noch "surface=ground" angegeben. Kommt das hin, oder wie ist der Belag mittlerweile?

Anbei noch ein paar hilfreiche Seiten im Wiki und bei Fragen bitte immer raus damit.

Alles Gute
silversurfer83

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contact_channels#Chats.2Fmessengers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137619557
Leo Slager (2023-06-22 08:44:40+00:00): Beste Kalamarin,
Die werkzaamheden zijn van relatief korte duur. In dit geval tot eind juni.
Daarvoor gaan we niet de kaart aanpassen.
Eventueel kun je gebruik maken van een conditional.
Dus access:conditional=no@(....).
Ik zal deze changeset reverten.
Leo Slager (2023-06-22 08:47:35+00:00): Reverted with my changeset 137637054
kalamarin (2023-06-22 12:41:28+00:00): Beste Leo,
Please feel free to add access:conditional=no@(....)
not just reverting changes.
It's better to have some indication that the area cannot be accessed rather than nothing as you left it.
blendergeek (2023-06-22 20:23:20+00:00): Please note that the value of the building tag refers to the "(architectural) type of building" (not the current use. For more info see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137620295
RouteSignal (2023-06-21 20:22:57+00:00): http://www.transportation.alberta.ca/projects/assets/Area_7_Calgary_Area/Hwy_2_at_Hwy_566_Balzac/Information%20Session%20Overall.pdf
Leo Slager (2023-06-22 09:46:48+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
TvLNL (2023-06-22 11:45:48+00:00): Hoi Leo, dank heb hem gelezen.
user_5359 (2023-06-22 05:07:47+00:00): Hello! Plea take a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1184057498.
EricJRW (2023-06-21 20:47:57+00:00): oops, meant it's not a service road, it's a diveway
EricJRW (2023-06-21 20:48:20+00:00): driveway
dima (2024-10-08 19:12:43+00:00): Hi. I go up to the Lankershim Memorial periodically. The area is the property of the Boy Scouts of America, and it's open to the public. I've never seen the gate locked. Unless you feel strongly, I'm going to revert this change. Yes?
Brrggg B (2024-10-09 11:34:47+00:00): I was only there once and it was locked, but if you have more experience, then yes, revert the change.
moje_konto (2023-06-21 22:59:26+00:00): www.openstreetmap.org/way/31980182/history

Zamiana obszaru na relację niestety nie wyszła, teraz teren "Wyborowa" się nie wyświetla. Nawet jest komunikat w podsumowaniu tej edycji "unclosed_multipolygon_part".

W ogóle jest jakiś powód żeby była to relacja z dwóch elementów?

Czy nie lepiej jedna linia ze znacznikami łącznie: płotu i terenu? Im prościej tym edycja jest łatwiejsza i unika się błędów.
moje_konto (2023-06-24 15:10:04+00:00): Zbędne relacje zmieniono z powrotem na linie w edycjach: #137667851, #137683401, #137683852.
Desriveaux (2023-06-22 14:06:06+00:00): dénomination validée par les anciens du hameau (M. Boyer et M. Lamonzie ; mémoires du hameau). Qui sont ces étrangers qui se permettent de remettre en cause les noms que les locaux donnent à leurs chemins, qui plus est sans même connaître les lieux ?
Jakka (2023-06-22 16:20:53+00:00): You were reported with peculiar suspicious edit on Belgian territory. Only official and signposted street names come into osm. Also, you hadn't replied to comments in support of those unusual naming and often strange names.
If you can show evidence of name additions in Belgium they are always welcome. For France it is the frence community who decides ....
Desriveaux (2023-06-22 14:06:25+00:00): dénomination validée par les anciens du hameau (M. Boyer et M. Lamonzie ; mémoires du hameau). Qui sont ces étrangers qui se permettent de remettre en cause les noms que les locaux donnent à leurs chemins, qui plus est sans même connaître les lieux ?
bxl-forever (2023-06-23 16:45:43+00:00): @Desriveaux: your changeset was undone because of lack of verifiability (not to mention incorrect capitalisation and more), and out of protection for the map after finding out that many changesets contained implausible names (sentier des Gembloutois bienheureux, sentier de Marie-Martine, sentier des coquefredouilles, chemin d'Olivier le Sardanapale, piste des fesse-mathieux, chemin des gourgandines…).
Either you invented them yourself and pretend they come from "old locals" that only you know, or, should those name really exist locally, they are not documented nor posted anywhere.  Those paths have been on the map for several years, it is very unlikely no-one would have missed the name.

If you want to make positive contributions to improve the map, some additional comments and guideline have been provided under your other changeset there.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137636642
archpdx (2023-06-22 21:19:29+00:00): Hi,

It appears that this is an import of building footprints. Please note that if you did not individually review each building added in these changesets, this counts as an import and must be discussed and documented prior to uploading, see https://wiki.osm.org/Import/Guidelines

It also looks like each node part of the building ways are also tagged with 'building=yes'. These nodes shouldn't have any tags to comply with https://wiki.osm.org/One_feature,_one_OSM_element

I ask that you revert this changeset and follow the import guidelines/fix errors I pointed out before reimporting. If you're not sure how to revert changes, read https://wiki.osm.org/Change_rollback
archpdx (2023-06-22 21:21:16+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137623128
user_5359 (2023-06-23 06:07:25+00:00): Hello! Please take a look on http://www.osm.org/node/4296928639. You have added a historicisation. 
    addr:housenumber:2021 = 41
    addr:postcode:2021 = 08800
    addr:street:2021 = Rambla de Sant Jordi
    amenity:2021 = restaurant
    entrance:2021 = yes
    name:2021 = Granja Bar La Creu
    phone:2021 = +34 938140203
If the building isn't destroyed, the address and the entrance exists.
    addr:housenumber = 41
    addr:postcode = 08800
    addr:street = Rambla de Sant Jordi
    amenity:2021 = restaurant
    entrance = yes
    name:2021 = Granja Bar La Creu
    phone:2021 = +34 938140203
It can also be assumed that this restaurant already existed in 2020 and that the telephone number is not needed as a means of identification.
    addr:housenumber = 41
    addr:postcode = 08800
    addr:street = Rambla de Sant Jordi
    amenity:-2021 = restaurant
    entrance = yes
    name:-2021 = Granja Bar La Creu
Please be careful when using the temporal historicisation!
ciutadavng (2023-07-06 11:22:33+00:00): The building does not exists anymore. During last 10 years it was a main place to eat good barbecue meat on Sundays. Now the land is empty waiting for a new building, with an entrance to that land.
DaveF (2023-09-10 10:38:08+00:00): Hi Your Cotham Updates appear to have split NCN 4. Could you take a look please.

https://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeMap?relationId=1318928
felipeeugenio (2023-06-22 14:26:41+00:00): Hola. por favor evitar este tipo de información provada en OSM. No es lo que mapeamos.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137624068
felipeeugenio (2023-06-22 14:27:58+00:00): El tag building= es para estructuras, no para el condominio entero.
Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137624068
user_125718 (2023-06-21 23:32:57+00:00): Die Öffnungszeiten müssen mit englischen Wochentagsbezeichnungen eintragen werden, wobei man die Schließtage nur angeben sollte, wenn die Regel sie benötigt. Wichtig ist das man bei den meisten Läden die Feiertagsschließung explizit angeben muß. Dieses Cafe darf natürlich Sonntags öffnen, egal ob Feiertag oder nicht. Habe es mal angepßt.

Siehe die Beispiele auf https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours
Die englischen Seiten sind aktueller, aber ich habe erst mal diverse Beispiele zur Erklärung für die deutsche Seite geschrieben und auch etwas Erklärtext. 

Wenn das Gutshaus z.B. ein Museum sein sollte, oder das da irgendwo mit Schild dran steht, dann das als Name für das Haus eintragen mit passenden Einrichtungs-Tag eintragen, sonst nicht.

Der Name von dem Cafe, ist im Zweifelsfall, was da vor Ort auf Schildern für alle sichtbar dransteht, also vermutlich eher "Cafe Bossa Nova" oder nur "Bossa Nova" ohne Gutshaus, das müßte noch korrigiert werden.
miluebe (2023-06-22 12:40:50+00:00): Vielen Dank für die Infos und die Korrekturen.
Vor Ort stand überhaupt kein Name oder irgendein Hinweisschild (daher auch schwierig zu finden), daher habe ich die Eigenbezeichnung von der Internetseite übernommen.
Das Gebäude ist tatsächlich das alte Gutshaus.
Ohne weitere Infos würde ich das erst einmal so lassen.
Falls Du meinst, dass dies dennoch geändert werden sollte, dann mache das gerne.
gscholz (2023-07-06 06:10:49+00:00): Hi
your recent changesets have destroyed the relation for "Parque Nacional Colima" step by step:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-89.12787&lat=14.02505&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=137624105

Do you really know what you are doing? I have partly reinstalled the original shape now to fix the broken relation. May be you can get in contact with the original author to check the real shape, but please do not destroy relations.
Kind regards
Guido
NorthCrab_upload (2023-06-21 22:50:11+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/328921479

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
taxi301 (2023-06-23 09:42:34+00:00): poprawione
StefanHRT (2023-06-22 02:05:31+00:00): Hi, in der Gegend ist vieles auch für Mapillary mit 360° (Panorama) aufgenommen, ggf. mal damit kontrollieren ;) Bei Deinem anderen Bücherschrank Mahlsdorfer Straße ist daneben z.B. ein Imbiss. VG
StefanHRT (2023-06-22 02:38:26+00:00): Habe den Bücherschrank mal leicht verschoben und das fixme entfernt https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1004955673488531&focus=photo&lat=52.479237799972&lng=13.5968557&z=17&x=0.6739398007920814&y=0.5603180598713593&zoom=0.7841074590537065