piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Jrachi (2025-03-15 16:43:48+00:00): water=279 è sicuramente un errore.
Ma cosa voleva significare?
dieterdreist (2025-03-15 21:26:46+00:00): deve essere `ascent`, mi dispiace che è sfuggito, ci potrebbe essere stato il focus della tastiera nel window dei tag, ho premuto w per cambiare modo di disegno ma ero nella finestra dei tag con il focus. accidenti…
muralito (2023-02-09 18:26:48+00:00): esto seria shop=pet
veterinary es cuando hay servicio medico para los bichos.
muralito (2023-02-09 18:25:35+00:00): esto es amenity=dentist. arreglado.
user_18386847 (2023-02-09 21:45:43+00:00): Gracias
RasandRoad (2023-02-06 12:21:50+00:00): 新門司港の岸壁をオーシャン東九フェリーの岸壁に変更したようですが、その情報源はどこにありますか？
I see that the quay at Shin Moji Port has been changed to Ocean Tokyu Ferry's quay, where can I find source for the information?
BCNorwich (2023-03-12 08:09:43+00:00): Dragged building outline restored.
VictorIE (2023-08-05 07:27:00+00:00): Hi,

Reservoirs like this (over-sized tanks, typically semi-underground) are man_made=reservoir_covered The tag water = reservoir is reserved(!) for reservoirs like this: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/38526474 :)
mawutor (2023-02-02 03:41:13+00:00): Thank you for mapping and taking part in the 28for28 campaign
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131971954
Calvin Menttor (2023-02-02 23:08:37+00:00): I appreciate the feedback.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131971954
jmarchon (2023-02-03 19:02:18+00:00): Hello,
"Eugene, OR Amtrak" is the name which is signed on location. Does that not mean it is the right name?

jmarchon
clay_c (2023-02-03 20:13:04+00:00): Hi again. Other stations around the country also have redundant or trivially derived info signed on the ground, such as the state abbreviation or some combination of the words "Amtrak" or "Station", but this is extraneous and not meant to be included in name=*. For most railway stations, the name is just the name of the locality it serves.

Exceptions to this include cities with more than one train station (e.g. Newark Penn and Newark Broad Street in New Jersey), as well as historic train terminals in certain cities. But Amtrak, the sole operator here, doesn't seem to give this station any such special treatment, which indicates that it falls under the default case: the name is just the locality's name.

Even Amtrak's GTFS feed considers the name to be just "Eugene": https://www.transit.land/stops/s-9rb6wgyzhp-eugene?feed_onestop_id=f-9-amtrak~amtrakcalifornia~amtrakcharteredvehicle&feed_version_sha1=fdad1b2ee827ed9543cf0ffc807f2d9c0d36e1bb&stop_id=EUG
jmarchon (2023-02-03 20:54:41+00:00): That makes sense. 
If I remember correctly from being there last, there is also conflicting information on site. Some signs do say just "Eugene", and others the name I put in.

Thanks,
jmarchon
◪ Jarv (2023-02-01 20:54:47+00:00): Hi, I see you have added one-way tags to some service roads. This road is a dead end so shouldn't be possible to be one-way. What are you trying to achieve with these edits?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131972729
olo81 (2023-08-18 12:51:29+00:00): parking to nie hotel 
tourism=hotel
trefne tagi
Jakub_Gorski (2023-08-20 09:47:29+00:00): Przyznaje się musiał mi się wkraść jakiś chochlik dziękuje za poprawienie
Glassman (2023-02-02 18:58:35+00:00): #TIP: Sometimes using more than one imagery source will help with adding features. For example the Tapteal Elementary School. The bing imagery is taken at an angle. The maxar premium imagery is almost directly overhead showing a square bldg. Different background imagery can be found on the right hand side of the editor with the background icon.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131973033
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-02-06 22:03:33+00:00): porque apagou o camnho interno aqui: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131973211/
meiazero (2023-02-07 00:23:49+00:00): vi que o terreno do campus é todo cercado, ou seja a estrada não existe mais.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131973211
Gonéo (2023-02-02 16:04:19+00:00): Le nom de la rue, le code postal et la ville ne sont pas nécessaires. Ils sont calculés automatiquement puisque le point d'adresse est lié à la rue par une relation.
maps_not_naps (2025-08-20 20:34:50+00:00): Hello João Duailibe,

I noticed you added this ferry route (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1137054780), however I don’t see a ferry terminal at the north end of the route (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1137054782) in aerial imagery. The OSM wiki page for ferries states that "Ferries are a form of public transport that operate to connect road networks and to provide passenger service much like bus service” and “ferry route(s) should start and end at a ferry terminal” (osm.wiki/Tag:route%3Dferry). Based on your knowledge of the area, do you think attraction=boat_ride would be a more appropriate tag than route=ferry (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:attraction%3Dboat_ride)? If so, would you be willing to update the tagging here?

Thanks, and looking forward to hearing from you!

Tradução automática:
Olá, João Duailibe,

Notei que você adicionou esta rota de balsa (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1137054780), porém não vejo um terminal de balsas na extremidade norte da rota (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1137054782) nas imagens aéreas. A página wiki do OSM para balsas afirma que "Balsas são uma forma de transporte público que opera para conectar redes rodoviárias e fornecer serviço de passageiros de forma semelhante ao serviço de ônibus" e "as rotas de balsa devem começar e terminar em um terminal de balsas" (osm.wiki/Tag:route%3Dferry). Com base no seu conhecimento da área, você acha que attraction=boat_ride seria uma tag mais apropriada do que route=ferry (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:attraction%3Dboat_ride)? Em caso afirmativo, você estaria disposto a atualizar a tag aqui?

Obrigado e aguardo seu contato!
Gonéo (2023-02-02 16:01:43+00:00): Bonjour et merci pour votre contribution.

Attention le restaurant en question existait déjà. Vous avez créé un doublon.

D'autre part vous avez transformé un point d'adresse en commerce. Il vaut mieux laisser le point d'adresse tel quel et ajouter un nouveau point pour le commerce (comme vous pourrez le voir sur les autres commerces de la rue).

La base d'adresse nationale indique le numéro 39 à cet endroit. Vous l'avez supprimé. Est-qu'il y a un 39 et un 41 sur le même immeuble ?
adiatmad (2023-02-02 10:52:34+00:00): Hi, good work on your edits! However, it would be preferable to avoid adding a generic name, such as name=house (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1137055167). You might want to take a look at this page (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions). 

If you're keen to know more about mapping, check out the following free resources:

∙ Beginner's Mapping guide - https://osm.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide
∙ Intermediate/Advanced self-paced learning

Happy mapping!
Gonéo (2023-02-02 15:53:19+00:00): Bonjour et merci pour votre contribution.

Le numéro 7 ajouté sur le groupe scolaire existait déjà en tant que point d'adresse, ce qui crée maintenant un doublon.

L'usage en France est de ne pas ajouter les adresses sur les bâtiments. Entre autres parce qu'un bâtiment peut avoir plusieurs adresses ou plusieurs bâtiments peuvent avoir une même adresse. D'autre part, le code postal et la ville ne sont plus nécessaires, ils sont calculés automatiquement.

Vous pouvez regarder comment sont construits les points d'adresse autour de ce bâtiment (notamment le n°7 qui existait déjà) et vous référer aussi à la page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Adresses
Gonéo (2023-02-02 15:55:36+00:00): Attention pour les niveaux le rez-de-chaussée est à prendre en compte. Donc 1 niveau signifie qu'il n'y a aucun étage et que le bâtiment est de plain-pied. (je ne sais pas si c'est le cas sur le bâtiment que vous avez modifié).
PJ120 (2023-09-14 05:50:02+00:00): Hey, my apologies for taking so long to respond to this.

The historical German town names you have deleted were correctly tagged given the current stance of the German community on the topic.

Some towns in what is nowadays Poland have had longstanding German names, many of which are still used today by German speakers. The current agreement within the community is that those names should be added under the tag name:de, as long as they were not part of any political renaming campaign. All of the names you have removed don’t meet this criteria and are thus correctly tagged.
maraf24 (2023-09-20 08:41:30+00:00): "Some towns in what is nowadays Poland have had longstanding German names, many of which are still used today by German speakers. "

Some. A few. Usually big cities. That's why they do have name:de tag.
The rest are names used only in historical context. They belong to old_name:de.

"The current agreement within the community is that those names should be added under the tag name:de, as long as they were not part of any political renaming campaign. "

So where is the problem? All german villages and towns were renamed after 1945 for political reasons.
All Polish names are new ones.

See "Ząbkowice Śląskie". Completely new name.
And what you put in name:de? "Frankenstein". This is ridiculous. 
There is no such town in Poland like "Frenkenstein". You can go there and check it.
And there is no administrative unit like "Landkreis Frankenstein" in Poland. This was fiction you'd created.
PJ120 (2023-09-20 11:01:12+00:00): Believe it or not, the name "Frankenstein" has been in use for hundreds of years and would likely still be mentioned by the German-speaking community if they refer to the town to other German speakers, which also applies for other towns in the area. You may find it ridiculous and have your own opinion on the topic, but as long as this is what most people agree on, you can't just remove hundreds of names.

For the translation of powiat names, the same applies as for gmina names. Translating the type of municipality "powiat" -> "Landkreis" followed by the German town name "Ząbkowice Śląskie" -> "Frankenstein" results in "Landkreis Frankenstein".

This is, as mentioned in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140914509, common practice in OSM and until agreed upon otherwise by the community also not subject of a large-scale revert.

The agreement that names resulting from political renaming should be tagged under old_name:de does only apply if the German name was the result of politically motivated renaming (e.g. changed names during the war), not if the name was changed after 1945. I made sure to only add such names under the tag old_name:de:-1945 or similar. See the wiki on this topic: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name:de
streckenkundler (2023-02-01 21:14:34+00:00): vom März 1929 ??? Hä?

bist du dir da sicher??? :(
lberges (2023-02-01 22:24:46+00:00): 100%ig sicher. Vorschlag persönlich gezeichnet von Bürgermeister Dörenkamp
Yunkers (2023-02-02 06:20:42+00:00): Dlaczego prawie wszystkie opisy do twoich zmian są takie same? Mapujesz długo, na pewno wiesz, że właściwy opis zmian jest ważny, a jego brak może być podstawą do wycofywania zmian.
Po drugie, skąd wziąłeś pomysł, że ten fragment drogi ekspresowej trzeba podnieść do autostrady? Czy wyczytałeś to gdzieś na wiki albo widziałeś podobne tagowanie w innych miejscach?
NorthCrab (2023-02-02 03:06:59+00:00): Dodany odcinek zezwala na ruch samochodowy, a przechodzi przez budynek? Coś tu trzeba zmienić. Pozdrawiam!
Hermes_Logos (2023-02-02 16:47:13+00:00): @NorthCrab, na dole jest brama przejazdowa, mały pojazd się zmieści, ale chyba od ulicy jest znak zakaz wjazdu "Nie dotyczy mieszkańców"
NorthCrab (2023-02-03 03:21:22+00:00): Okej, dzięki za informacje!
Glassman (2023-02-02 19:04:49+00:00): #TIP: remove the old landuse when adding in a new landuse. In this case, change part of the landuse=farmland to landuse=construction. If you don't know what the new construction area will be used for you can drop the construction=* tag. If this seems reasonable can you review and update your edit?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131975181
aliensuperstar (2023-04-20 04:31:53+00:00): Isn’t the value “customers” better than “private” in this case for the roads’ “access” tag?
dcskobuffs (2023-04-21 13:54:09+00:00): Hello fitojb, I can see access=customers being a possibility for this area and am open to you making that tag change here. There were already access=private tags in this parking lot prior to my edit and I didn’t have clear enough resources to change the type of access tag here, so I felt it best to extend the use of access=private that was already in place.
ZahnOli (2023-02-06 23:12:53+00:00): Merci pour la modif !
Meilleurs salutations
Olivier Zahn
Ess Bee (2023-10-23 16:12:42+00:00): Hallo fleißige Kartenpleger!
Ich vermisse für Neu-Isenburg die Anwohnerzahl (population), sowohl als "city" wie auch in dieser Relation.
V.G. aus der Nachbachstadt
urk (2026-07-16 16:18:08+00:00): Hallo Stefan, als ich Ergänzungen vornehmen wollte, bin ich über deine tags zur Parkplatzbeleuchtung "gestolpert": z.Bsp. node 10599755926. Ich finde die Beschreibung als Flutlichtanlage statt street_lamp etwas überdimensioniert, zumal wenn man die Lampen auf dem REAL-Parkplatz in Neuruppin mit dem wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Stadium_Ion_Oblemenco_-_flood_light.JPG) vergleicht. Könntest du dir vorstellen, die als street_lamp umzutaggen?
TNOTB (2024-07-10 12:21:02+00:00): Der Ringpark Würzburg ist eine Grünanlage und zu 95% der Wege sind nicht für das befahren mit einem Fahrrad erlaubt.
mawutor (2023-02-02 03:39:14+00:00): Thank you for mapping and taking part in the 28for28 campaign. Good mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131975982
DD1GJ (2023-02-02 09:25:08+00:00): Es ist nicht notwendig, verkehrsberuhigte Bereiche nochmal extra für Fahrräser freizugeben. Es ist zwar eine Einbahnstraße, aber durch cycleway=opposite ist angegeben, dass Radfahrer auch in Gegenrichtung fahren dürfen.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway=living street
Glassman (2023-02-02 19:31:15+00:00): Both King County and the City of Auburn show this as 63rd Court South. Bing Streetside imagery, which I admit is fairly old, also shows this as 63rd Court South. See https://www.bing.com/maps?toWww=1&redig=4A827C653A9D480E80AB513B46B43DA8&cp=47.335851%7E-122.255088&lvl=19.7&style=x

Can you review this edit and let me know if it should remain as South 296th Court? I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131976178
CEliza114 (2023-02-02 23:25:49+00:00): This was a request directly from the Auburn transportation engineer to fix this street name. The street sign at the location is consistent with S 296th Court. Auburn doesn’t have a public facing map service but on our internal street centerline and pavement layers, the street is S 296th Court. I have reached out to Google Maps and Esri in attempts to edit their base maps. I admittedly am not 100% sure who the final authority on street names is, but I do know that the City of Auburn considers it so.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131976178
Glassman (2023-02-02 23:49:29+00:00): Thanks for the info. Like I mentioned, Bing Streetside is dated so the street sign could have been changed since. I did reach out to a friend in King County GIS to see if he know who has final say on street names. (It certainly isn't OSM) If I hear anything that might help you I'll let you know.  

I any event - thanks for updating OSM. Let me know if you ever need any help fixing OSM. I've worked with a number of cities in the region. I'm up in Mount Vernon so the area is familiar with me.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131976178
maraf24 (2023-02-01 21:08:24+00:00): Proszę o prawidłowe opisywanie zestawów zmian. Więcej jest na
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
impiaaa (2023-02-02 18:34:05+00:00): I've reverted your change. "name=golf" is an invalid tag, and the areas are multipolygons, not boundaries. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls for golf mapping guidance.
user_16852535 (2023-06-22 17:11:37+00:00): Blokada na Wichrowej została usunięta. Nie ma już zakazu przejścia, ulica jest otwarta dla wszystkich.
mawutor (2023-02-02 03:38:19+00:00): Thank you for mapping and taking part in the 28for28 campaign
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131976606
maraf24 (2023-02-02 20:02:46+00:00): Proszę o zaprzestanie robienia takich zmian w galeriach handlowych.
Kasey2 (2023-02-02 21:12:13+00:00): Zmiany były robione koło 20:15, kiedy jeszcze jedyną odpowiedzią na moje pytanie na Discordzie było "corridor + indoor", co wydawało się poprawne i nie wiedziałem wtedy jeszcze o praktyce tagowania tego jako footway (wiki nie wspomina o tym).
NorthCrab (2023-02-03 03:53:14+00:00): Co jest nie tak z tą zmianą? Nic nie wyjaśniłeś @maraf24.
maraf24 (2023-02-03 10:01:42+00:00): @Kasey2: na przykładzie Pasażu Zielińskiego - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/287556526 - widać, jak to należy zrobić. Te korytarze, które służą do przechodzenia przez budynek  należy tagować jako highway=footway. Pozostałe jako corridor (lub wcale, bo to tylko opcja).
Ten pasaż ma też taką funkcję, i to dość spektakularną - można wejść do tunelu na południe od ronda i wyjść po północno-wschodniej stronie pasażu, oszczędzając sobie wiele trudu w pokonywaniu tego dużego skrzyżowania (czego widać nie było, bo ktoś parę miesięcy wcześniej skasował drugie wyjście z budynku dające taką możliwość).
silversurfer83 (2023-02-03 08:23:44+00:00): Moin Uwe,

es sieht so aus, als hättest du https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/33216/history gelöscht. Sehe ich das richtig? Falls ja, war das Absicht? Falls ja, warum?

Grüße
silversurfer83
segubi (2023-07-29 20:11:32+00:00): Anderer Fehler, Routenbeschreibung der Internationalen Radroute von "From Millingen to Prag" in "Sperre Schwimmbereich" zu ändern kann eher keine Absicht sein... und ist auch nicht mit "Landuse eingetragen" erklärt. 
Man sollte auf einen Changesetkommentar übrigens ruhig reagieren. Was ist aus der Relation 33216 geworden? Macht mich nun auch neugierig...
eggie (2023-02-01 20:40:36+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback Meestal is er een uitzondering voor tweewielers. Is dat hier het geval. Dan bijtaggen 
oneway:bicycle=no  en evt ook voor moped en mofa.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-02-01 20:46:59+00:00): De bovenstaande uitzonderingen heb ik toegevoegd.
MVG
eggie
sno_1998 (2023-02-01 21:03:26+00:00): Omdat de situatie tav wel of niet uitzondering tav fietsers/bromfietsers is niet geheel duidelijk aangegeven is op de bebording had ik die niet aangegeven in mijn wijziging. Ik weet namelijk niet zeker of het onderbord aan beide zijden vermeld staat (aan de Slingerbos zijde staat het onderbord wel, maar zal ter plekke moeten checken of onderbord ook aan de Molenweg zijde staat).
eggie (2023-02-01 21:43:58+00:00): Het onderbord staat volgens mij wel aan de westkant..
Dat geeft in ieder geval de mogelijkheid om tegen de eenrichting in te gaan.
Eigenlijk zou er een berichtje richting gemeente 'moeten'...  je ziet dit soort slordigheden wel meer.
Vaak ook bij doodlopende weg. Uitgezonderd fietsers ontbreekt bijna altijd.
Groet..
eggie
eggie (2023-02-01 21:57:37+00:00): Hier het verkeersborden-databestand van de overheid
https://smoothefiets.ddns.net/html/verkeersbordenkaart/index.php?lat=52.289953388&lng=6.147156358&z=18
Er is inderdaad geen uitzondering van oost naar west... vreemd....  Van west naar oost wel.
dvdhoven (2023-02-02 07:42:21+00:00): Niet zo vreemd als je 47 jaar in de Gemeente Deventer woont. :-)
De gemeente  zet wel vaker geen onderbord bij de C03, alleen aan de kant van de C02
Mij was het eerlijk gezegd nooit opgevallen dat dat stukje Slingerbos geen eenrichting had in OSM en ik kom er vaak zat. Oeps

Groet,
Dick van den Hoven
sno_1998 (2023-02-02 09:54:15+00:00): Aan de westzijde staat ook geen onderbord onder het bord D05r wat daar staat, dus dat correspondeert iig wel met elkaar.
Voor (brom)fietsers is het wel een onduidelijke situatie zo, want op het andere stuk Slingerbos dat N-Z loopt geldt wel een uitzondering voor bromfietsers (met onderbord aan beide kanten).
eggie (2023-02-02 10:13:07+00:00): Dag sno
Wel vreemd dat er dan bij het bord C2  op het bewuste stukje Slingerbos wel een onderbord staat.  Het is volgens mij gewoon een manko. Een bericht naar de gemeente zou op z'n plaats zijn. 
Daar zou ook 'moeten' staan muv (brom)fietsers.
Dan zou je alleen komende van de Roeterdsweg als fietser links mogen afslaan. 
Je kunt als lokale mapper dan het beste zelf even de Gemeente tippen via de website.  
Dan zie je ook het effect van je melding.

MVG
eggie
sno_1998 (2023-02-02 10:55:22+00:00): Bedankt voor de suggestie. Ik zal even gaan navragen bij de gemeente hoe zij de situatie tav (brom)fietsers in dat stukje weg nou precies bedoeld hebben (en daarnaast ook even aparte melding doen over slechte zichtbaarheid bord D05r agv begroeiing).
Mapper991 (2023-02-04 19:17:10+00:00): Ja, der Verlauf des Qualser Wegs muss so sein, denn in Göhl wird der Weg als Brookkamp ausgewiesen. Ich habe mir neulich die Wege auch mal angesehen und sie sind an beiden Enden wie genannt ausgeschildert. Ich schließe mal noch den Hinweis dazu.
Dodko (2023-02-02 06:29:56+00:00): Pri presťahovaní sa nemá vymazať POI bod ale presunúť na nové miesto a aktualizovať kontakt, otvárací čas a podobne.
Strubbl (2023-02-07 21:08:22+00:00): Hi oakegis24, dein Kommentar zum Änderungssatz hast du hier vergessen. Daher meine Frage: Hast du die Treppe, die hier war, aus Versehen gelöscht oder ist die wirklich nicht mehr da?

Viele Grüße
oakegis24 (2023-02-08 14:00:16+00:00): Hi Strubbel, diese Treppe existiert tatsächlich nicht mehr. Diese wurde im Zuge des Neubaus entfernt der Weg wurde barrierefrei neu angelegt.
mawutor (2023-02-02 03:37:35+00:00): Thank you for mapping and taking part in the 28for28 campaign.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131977210
garaolaza (2023-02-02 07:30:04+00:00): Oraintxe Goienan albistea ikusi eta gasolindegiak kargatuta daudela ikustean ze poza! Eskerrik asko Oier!
Noen (2023-02-02 16:00:51+00:00): Hei! Dette endringsettet ble litt større enn Auglendsdalen. Har tilbakestilt det du ikke har flettet inn i https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132008887
Glassman (2023-02-02 19:06:38+00:00): In the US we just mark the crossing as marked or unmarked. Zebra is unique to England.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131977909
Glassman (2023-02-02 19:19:02+00:00): #TIP: I noticed you moved the gas station roof. Often the currently imagery is offset from the original edit. The offset can be adjusted in the editor by going to the background icon on the right had side of the editor. The offset can be changed from the bottom of the list of options.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131978005
maciek-szn (2023-02-01 21:40:20+00:00): Powierzchnia powinna być podana z kropką, a nie przecinkiem (angielski zapis liczb) :)
ptarac (2023-02-01 22:03:34+00:00): Fakt. Poprawione.
VictorIE (2023-02-02 11:37:53+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/919860731
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1106779891
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8545040574

Several objects seem to have been stretched out of shape.