piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisRevert (2026-02-10 18:52:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/178374337
where the comment is: "Remove vandalism"
Rainero (2026-03-16 11:36:34+00:00): Revert mit changeset/179946400
(unzulässige Quelle)
notmyproblem1 (2026-02-12 16:51:14+00:00): source?
Bat Wings (2026-02-13 10:00:40+00:00): Please
Look at
https://www.d-marin.com/en/marinas/porto-mirabello/
notmyproblem1 (2026-02-13 10:20:58+00:00): I'm gonna write, via a translator, in user language for better knowledge.

Merhaba,

Sadece kolaylık ve daha iyi anlaşılabilmesi için size kendi dilinizde yazıyorum. Bir çeviri aracı kullanıyorum.

Sitenin en alt kısmında “© 2026 D-Marin” ibaresini gördüm. Bu nedenle verilerin telif hakkı kapsamında olabileceğini düşünüyorum (ayrıca ankette bunu doğrulayan açık bir ibare göremedim — varsa da fark etmemiş olabilirim). (survey was already done, I didn't see any MOLO A/B/C etc.)

Site sahibinden kullanım izni alındığına dair bir kanıtınız varsa, lütfen bunu paylaşabilir misiniz?

Kızgın bir haritacı gibi görünebilirim, ama aslında oldukça arkadaş canlısıyım. Çeviri sert ya da kızgın bir ton yansıtıyorsa şimdiden özür dilerim ❤

Translated with DeepL.com (free version)
Bat Wings (2026-02-13 11:58:22+00:00): Hello,
I filled out the marina's attribute data based solely on the information provided on the website. I obtained permission to use the information by phone, but I cannot provide any written document or data; it's  based on parol evidence.
I did the same thing for all locations under the D Marina operation in Italy. 
Thank you for your understanding and have a good day . :)
notmyproblem1 (2026-02-13 16:44:04+00:00): Merhaba, açıklamanız için teşekkürler.

Sadece bilginize: “sadece web sitesinde verilen bilgilere dayanarak” öznitelikleri eklediğinizi belirttiğiniz için (bunu burada görebilirsiniz: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178373621), bu durum OpenStreetMap açısından telif/izin konusu doğurabilir. Örneğin Porto Mirabello sayfasında “VHF 73” bilgisi yer alıyor (burada görebilirsiniz: https://www.d-marin.com/en/marinas/porto-mirabello/) ve sitenin alt kısmında “© 2026 D-Marin” ibaresi bulunuyor (burada görebilirsiniz: https://www.d-marin.com/en/marinas/porto-mirabello/).

OSM’de genel yaklaşım, üçüncü taraf kaynakların ya yeniden kullanıma uygun/uyumlu lisanslı olması ya da topluluk tarafından referans verilebilecek açık bir yazılı izin bulunmasıdır (bilgilendirme burada: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Legal_FAQ) ve izin alma süreciyle ilgili öneriler burada: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Getting_permission.

Herhangi bir suçlama yapmıyorum — sadece “telefonla izin” OSM topluluğu için doğrulanması zor bir durum olabiliyor. Bu yüzden, nasıl ilerlemek gerektiği konusunda OpenStreetMap Foundation Data Working Group ile iletişime geçip yönlendirme almanız iyi olabilir (sayfaları burada: https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Data_Working_Group).

Teşekkürler.
Bat Wings (2026-02-13 18:47:39+00:00): Thank you your feedback. 
Teşekkürler bilgilendirici ve nazik tutumunuz için iyi çalışmalar yeni bir şey öğrendim :)
notmyproblem1 (2026-02-20 10:56:28+00:00): Hi.
https://www.mapillary.com/app/user/omfg_notpr?lat=44.0992441&lng=9.8255965&z=17&pKey=883675857777954&focus=photo

Sevgili discover, bu mesajda kızgın gibi göründüğüm için tekrar özür dilerim ama ben barışçıl biriyim.
Yaptığım bir araştırmaya göre (yukarıdaki bağlantı), deniz fenerinin bulunduğu kavşaktan Porto Mirabello'ya, alışveriş merkezine doğru giderken, eklediğiniz isimleri gösteren bir harita (referanslar ve diğer bilgilerle birlikte) bulabilirsiniz. “name=” yerine “ref=” yazmak daha iyi olmaz mı? Çünkü Aldo Moro Sokak'tan veya köprüden gelirken yol levhası yok, bu yüzden isim olarak değil, referans numaraları olarak doğrulanabilir.

Translated with DeepL.com (free version)

Thanks. Tusekkler.
Bat Wings (2026-02-21 11:12:35+00:00): Merhaba,
Kızgın görünmüyorsunuz bu tarz şeyler normal çünkü sistem böyle ilerliyor ve gelişiyor.Yazınızı ve gönderinizi inceledim. “name=” yerine “ref=” yazmak daha iyi olmaz mı ? Evet daha uygun duruyor 'ref =' olarak kullanmak teşekkür ederim. İyi çalışmalar :)
notmyproblem1 (2026-02-22 10:50:04+00:00): Hi,
Merhaba! Bir dahaki sefere lütfen benim mesajımı alıntı yaparken tırnak işaretleri kullanın, çevirmen çıldırdı ve ben de anlamadım.

“name=*” ile “ref=” arasında senin yaptığın herhangi bir değişiklik görmedim.
Ayrıca kağıt haritalar/posterler/vb. de telif hakkı altında gibi görünüyor (OSM ile uyumlu CC lisansı veya CC0, yani serbest kullanım hakkı olduğu **açıkça** belirtilmedikçe).

Tekrar özür dilemek yerine, sana sadece şunu söyleyeceğim:
“Mesajlarımda kızgın görünüyor olsam da, aslında kızgın değilim.”
Bat Wings (2026-02-22 11:28:06+00:00): Merhaba,
Rıhtımların öznitelik bilgileri “name=*” yerine “ref=” olarak değiştirildi. OSM ile uyumlu CC lisansı  veya  CC0 lisansı görmedim bu yüzden değişiklikleri siliyorum
TinPetreković (2026-02-11 17:23:12+00:00): Truck restriction tag fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178417024
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-03-14 00:05:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 179832897 where the changeset comment is: Reverting numerous undiscussed road category changes.  See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=2261940 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19961
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-03-14 00:05:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 179832897 where the changeset comment is: Reverting numerous undiscussed road category changes.  See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=2261940 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19961
Znaika (2026-02-10 19:40:43+00:00): Ich denke, dieser Schlüssel ist für was größeres vorgesehen. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:power=plant?uselang=de
Was man hier hat, ist zum Heizen von Paar Häusern vorgesehen
Znaika (2026-02-10 19:47:58+00:00): Was größeres gibt es in Düsseldorf, um den ganzen Stadtteil zu heizen https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/87712515
Und was sehr kleines ähnliches in Kaarst
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/871853865
The Invisible Freak (2026-02-11 17:24:21+00:00): OK, wobei in verschiedenen Wikieinträgen zu Kraftwerkstypen auch Blockheizkraftwerke erwähnt werden, z.B. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:generator:method.
Und diese Wärmeerzeugungsanlage https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13446498818 wurde ähnlich getaggt.
Znaika (2026-02-11 17:52:03+00:00): Hi, ich finde, es ist nicht ganz ok von Kelso in MG gelöst. Ich kann es mit ihm auch diskutieren.
Wenn ich drauf klicke, wird es als Stromgenerator angezeigt.
Es ist für ein Gaskraftwerk, was Strom erzeugt und dafür Gas verbrennt.
In unserem Fall ist es nicht. 

Der tag power=generator dient zum Erfassen von Anlagen zur Erzeugung von Energie. Dies können Windenergieanlagen, Photovoltaikanlagen, Biomassekraftwerke, Wasserkraftwerke, Kohlekraftwerke, Gaskraftwerke, Atomkraftwerke oder weitere denkbare Kraftwerke sein.
Gruß, Znaika
The Invisible Freak (2026-02-11 19:05:07+00:00): OK, ich vermute, Du hast Dich schon länger mit diesen Dingen beschäftigt als ich. Ich bin erst sein einem Jahr her dabei und lasse mich gerne überzeugen.

Es gibt übrigens hier noch eine Wärmeerzeugungsanlage https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/961946069, die ich nach der Vorgabe von Kelso genauso getaggt habe. Es könnte also sein, dass diese auch falsch ist.
Znaika (2026-02-12 16:54:51+00:00): Hi,
ich habe mehr nachgeforscht.
Die von dir angegebenen Werte für ein BHKW waren hier falsch.
landuse=industrial
plant:method=combustion
plant:output:electricity=yes
plant:source=gas
power=plant

BHKW werden immer kleiner und kommen bei EFH und MFH zum Einsatz.
Ein BHKW hat einen Generator, der Strom erzeugt.
Deswegen power=generator und nicht plant und alle anderen Werte im Bezug auf Generator:
generator:method=combustion
generator:output:electricity=yes
generator:output:heat=yes
generator:source=gas

generator:output:hot_water=??? ist nicht bekannt. unknown passt hier vielleicht nicht

Bei dem anderen Fall, wenn es nur um eine Wärmeerzeugungsanlage geht, da steht im Gebäude nur ein Brennwertkessel, keine Stromerzeugung (kein Generator)
Gruß,
Znaika.
P.S. In Kaarst auf Astrid-Lindgren-Straße werde ich es anpassen und bei electricity und heat den Wert in kW statt YES schreiben
The Invisible Freak (2026-02-12 17:19:32+00:00): Besten Dank. Ich werde versuchen, beim nächsten Mal dran zu denken wenn ich noch mal auf eine dieser Anlagen treffe.
NeisBot (2026-02-10 18:56:40+00:00): 🌍 Bienvenido a OSM, AdameSz09.
Gracias por contribuir.

Para hacer que la colaboración sea más fácil y ayudar a los demás a entender tus ediciones, es mejor agregar una breve descripción de los cambios que hiciste. Los comentarios claros ayudan a la comunidad a seguir tu trabajo y proporcionar mejores comentarios. Puedes encontrar consejos para escribir buenos comentarios aquí[1].

✅ Aquí hay un comentario de ejemplo basado en tus ediciones del mapa: "Actualicé los detalles del sitio web"
(Auto-translation)
---
🌍 Welcome to OSM, AdameSz09.
Thanks for contributing!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

✅ Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Updated website details"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish
NeisBot (2026-02-10 19:03:48+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13541545171 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Roofing company"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-02-19 05:34:36+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/178535014
Thierry1030 (2026-02-12 23:50:13+00:00): question: food court Le Wolf is mapped as an area > https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/754772541
why not here as well?
bxl-forever (2026-02-13 09:28:37+00:00): Both options are fine.
I don’t mind mapping it as an area… but, contrary to Wolf which I surveyed myself, I don’t know if Ratz uses the entire building here, including the NW extension. Not to mention that, since it is a new building it is difficult to know whether the building shape traced from the current UrbIS imagery is the new one or if they are still showing the old one.
If you have more info or if you want to survey from the inside, feel free.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-03-14 00:05:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 179832897 where the changeset comment is: Reverting numerous undiscussed road category changes.  See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=2261940 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19961
NightH (2026-02-15 13:11:08+00:00): Szia!

Úgy néz ki, hogy az OsmInEdit app bent hagy néhány hibát a szerkesztésekben. Több helyen önmetsző vonalak, vagy egy vonalon belül többször ismétlődő pontok jelennek meg. 
Az OSM Inspector szépen megmutatja ezeket a hibákat, kiemelve a hibás vonalakat és pontokat: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=19.06781&lat=47.48037&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik Standard&overlays=long_ways%2Cways_with_long_segments%2Clong_segments%2Cself_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way%2Clong_ways%2Cways_with_long_segments%2Clong_segments%2Cself_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way 
Rá tudsz nézni esetleg, hogy ki tudod-e javítani ezeket?
NightH (2026-02-15 13:14:02+00:00): Az előző posztban megtört a link, itt van helyesen: https://smplu.link/M0grd
Godo365 (2026-02-15 19:35:24+00:00): Ohh igen, itt valami szétment és még mindig nem lett jó (összevissza meghagyott meg kitörölt node-okat különböző szinteken). A héten majd javítgatom, köszi hogy jelezted.
qstep (2026-02-15 21:08:56+00:00): Javaslom a JOSM szerkesztőt, annál robosztusabb megoldás nem létezik. Bár van egy meredek learning curve-je, érdemes kisebb dolgokkal kezdeni. https://josm.openstreetmap.de/
NightH (2026-02-16 07:08:28+00:00): A JOSM-et én is javaslom, bár egy kicsit okosítani kell rajta, hogy az indoor mappingre is alkalmas legyen. Szerencsére létezik hozzá plugin, ami nagyban megkönnyíti a beltéri szerkesztést: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/indoorhelper

Egy próbát megér szerintem.
Ltrlg (2026-02-11 09:25:58+00:00): Normalement parking=surface est réservé aux parkings contenant leur voie d’accès. Cette interprétation de la zone aurait plutôt amené un parking=street_side ici. Cependant je suis d’accord avec parking=surface si on étend le parking à la zone comme je viens de le faire dans changeset/178396478.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-03-14 00:06:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 179832897 where the changeset comment is: Reverting numerous undiscussed road category changes.  See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=2261940 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19961
Dvorný (2026-02-10 19:19:18+00:00): Řešeno to bylo už zde: https://openstreetmap.cz/talkcz/c4365
Nedalo se rozeznat, proč by někde zahrady být měly a někde ne. Jde tedy o chybu při importu. Geometrie těchto zahrad tedy nedávala smysl a orientovat se dle toho tedy také nedalo.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-03-14 00:05:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 179832897 where the changeset comment is: Reverting numerous undiscussed road category changes.  See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=2261940 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19961
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-03-14 00:05:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 179832897 where the changeset comment is: Reverting numerous undiscussed road category changes.  See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=2261940 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19961
TheSwavu (2026-02-11 04:27:09+00:00): Hi,

Nattai Ponds is not a suburb. You can check the list here https://proposals.gnb.nsw.gov.au/public/geonames/search

As far as I can tell it's the name of the housing development. If you know the boundaries you can put a residential landuse around it an add a name.

Cheers.
aTarom (2026-02-11 09:40:11+00:00): Hola, se ha quedado un tag con
"Right"
en
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1476274982/history
no estoy seguro de si añadirlo al description existente, si puedes revisarlo, gracias y saludos
diec_import-catastro-Malaga (2026-02-12 22:14:18+00:00): Efectivament.  Copy & Paste no es siempre tu amigo.  Corregido.  Saludos
Ltrlg (2026-02-11 09:32:45+00:00): Pourquoi avoir séparé way/178396478 et way/1476281457 ?
Sébastien Chopin (2026-02-21 10:36:39+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/178396478 n’est sans doute pas le chemin dont tu voulais me parler…
Ltrlg (2026-02-24 13:22:33+00:00): Non en effet : way/1476281456 plutôt.
GerdP (2026-02-10 20:16:04+00:00): Kommentar ^ durch JOSM. Gebäudeumrisse,Lageverbesserungen
silversurfer83 (2026-02-11 07:35:10+00:00): Sieht gut aus :)

Bei den Güllepötten kannst du noch content=slurry hinzufügen.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178377669
Finn Freitag (2026-02-11 09:33:22+00:00): Ja danke. Hab ich noch hinzugefügt, siehe Changeset 178396788
silversurfer83 (2026-02-11 09:35:53+00:00): Bestens :)
Mashin (2026-02-11 11:03:15+00:00): Hi,
thanks for edits! Just noticed that you forgot to split the sidewalk at Fairfield Avenue and tag it as crossing.

Cheers
atticquilt (2026-02-11 15:26:25+00:00): Got it, thanks for the heads up.
ion_chi (2026-02-10 23:59:57+00:00): OSM is for mapping the physical world, not the locations of events. I've already added the memorial Alex Pretti here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13520073826

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178383060
El ArquiPachuca (2026-02-15 06:48:15+00:00): The elimination of the area of land under construction from "Integration" does not complement the information poured on the map.
Sometimes you do not want to delete the whole thing but just an aspect of it. For example, if a hotel has an address, and stops being a hotel, then it still is a building and still has an address! Deleting the hotel outright would lose this address information - in such a case you would just remove the "hotel" aspect (or, in OSM parlance, the tourism=hotel tag and any additional stuff about rating, website, contact details) and not the whole object.
In this case, the area still belongs to PEMEX and is divided into segments of walls along its perimeter.
The point of complete elimination of the element causes the los of information of the area and its perimeter to be lost, leaving the information of the place incomplete.
My proposal for the set of changes is to place the brownfield label and update the land uses north of the land.
eggie (2026-02-10 22:04:48+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Udarian (2026-02-10 21:29:10+00:00): the ALPR added in this changeset is in the middle of the road so I doubt the accuracy of its position. Can you please check its position and fix it.

Happy mapping,
Udar.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-03-14 00:05:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 179832897 where the changeset comment is: Reverting numerous undiscussed road category changes.  See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=2261940 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19961
NeisBot (2026-02-10 20:56:54+00:00): 🌍 Bem-vindo ao OSM, }{■.
Obrigado por contribuir!

Para tornar a colaboração mais fácil e ajudar os outros a entender as suas edições, é melhor adicionar uma breve descrição das alterações que fez. Comentários claros ajudam a comunidade a seguir o seu trabalho e fornecer feedback melhor. Você pode encontrar dicas sobre como escrever bons comentários aqui[1].

✅ Aqui está um exemplo de comentário baseado nas suas edições do mapa: "Adicionados nomes, incluindo Est da Fabrica, Est Vitorino Silva"
(Auto-translation)
---
🌍 Welcome to OSM, }{■.
Thanks for contributing!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

✅ Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added names, including Est da Fabrica, Est Vitorino Silva"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish
dvillas (2026-02-13 17:11:34+00:00): Source used was Mapbox Satellite
silversurfer83 (2026-02-11 07:45:57+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap :)

danke, dass du hilfst die Datenbank aktuell zu halten.

Ich nehme an, dass du hier bei dem Hühnerstall nach Gefühl gearbeitet hast, da das Gebäude noch nicht im Luftbild ist. Du hast es dabei etwas unglücklich mit dem Feldweg und dem Acker selbst verbunden. Da solltest du in Zukunft etwas besser aufpassen. Wenn du dem OsmCha-Link in dieser Nachricht folgst, kannst du es sehen.

Ich habe mal die Liegenschaftskarte als Hintergrund gewählt (findest du im rechten Menü im Editor) und dort ist schon was hinterlegt. Habe den Stall entsprechend angepasst:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178393415

Wenn du Fragen hast, einfach melden, unter wiki.osm.org gucken, im Forum unter c.osm.org fragen oder in die Signal Gruppe kommen.

happy mapping

silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178378384
Schröder-Homberg (2026-02-11 19:31:45+00:00): Danke für das korrekte Einpflegen. Da ich neu hier bin: Hier war der Stall noch nicht im Satellitenbild vorhanden, um ihn zu umrunden. Wo her kommen diese Bilder und in welchem Rhythmus werden dieses aktualisiert? Gibt es bei fehlenden Hintergrundbildern eine andere Möglichkeit, als nur ungefähr die Zeichnung vorzunehmen? Danke auch für den Straßenhinweis.
silversurfer83 (2026-02-11 20:09:01+00:00): Gerne.

Zu den nutzbaren Hintergründen:

EU sei Dank sind die Daten der Bundesländer (mit Ausnahmen) für uns verfügbar. Wie oft die Orthophotos (DOP) und Liegenschaftskarten (ALKIS) aktualisiert werden hängt natürlich von den jeweiligen Ämtern ab, sie sind aber oft ziemlich frisch(6 bis 18 Monate?). Dazu kommen Bilder verschiedener anderer Anbieter, die in DE häufig jedoch älter und unsauberer sind als die der Länder.

Du kannst die diversen Bilder über das Menü am rechten Rand umschalten und dann siehst du zB den Umriss des Stalls im ALKIS.

Wenn ein Objekt so neu ist, dass es auf keinem Hintergrund erkennbar ist, dann versuchen wir möglichst gut zu schätzen. Also vor Ort genau gucken, Notizen machen, Fluchten finden, vielleicht Maße nehmen und dies dann nach bestem Wissen und gewissen in den Editor über tragen. In solchen Fällen ist dann das (zusätzliche) Eigenschaftenfeld note=* und/oder fixme=* mit passenden Informationen für weitere Mapper angebracht. Als Text im Fixme wäre sowas wie "Umriss nach Begehung geschätzt; Bitte nach Luftbildupdate verbessern" gut (Text natürlich an Umstand anpassen). QS-Werkzeuge schauen oft auf diese Eigenschaft. 

Bei Fragen immer weiter raus damit. Vieles Findest du im Wiki unter wiki.osm.org oder im Forum unter c.osm.org oder schau in unserer Signalgruppe vorbei
VJMK (2026-02-10 22:07:10+00:00): @andrzej-pl Usunięcie tego węzła nie rozwiązuje problemu, o którym pisałem w /changeset/178351131, bo nadal nie wiadomo z jakich źródeł korzystasz podejmując takie decyzje. Pisząc tamte komentarze nie oczekiwałem ani nie sugerowałem natychmiastowego usunięcia skupu złomu. Punkt równie dobrze mógłby pozostać na mapie, ale oznaczony np. prefiksami was: lub disused: żeby przedstawić, że jego główna funkcja nie działa. Wszystko zależy od tego jak to wygląda na miejscu.
kubahahaha (2026-02-13 09:05:13+00:00): Dobra, ale skoro ten skup istnieje i @andrzej-pl jak pisze sam go widział, to powinien znajdować się na mapie.

W takiej sytuacji w pole źródło zazwyczaj wpisuje się "local survey"/"wiedza lokalna"
VJMK (2026-02-13 10:35:36+00:00): @kubahahaha Toteż mnie chodziło tylko o odpowiednie otagowanie z podaniem źródła, a nie o to by ten węzeł koniecznie usuwać.
Luke_Vader (2026-02-11 14:08:45+00:00): Hello,
Firstly, thank you for contributing information to OSM, that is always highly appreciated.

However, I noticed that your changesets are usually if not always changing one or two elements, with the comment "minor changes"
Please do not do this, it gives absolutely no information on what the edit is.
Please *describe* what you changed. It doesn't need to be detailed, it could be e.g. "Updated hairdresser to standardised wikidata tag"

Secondly, bundle your changes into larger changesets.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178378677
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178378585

Both of the above changes are tiny changes to the exact same element, including this changeset, all of these changes should have been in one changeset.
This is not to say that you cannot go back and fix mistakes, that is highly appreciated, but try to bundle your changes when you can.

Thank you and happy mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178378677
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-02-12 01:48:47+00:00): Why did you downgrade these roads to tertiary? They're wider and have bike lanes at either end, which (so far) has been my indicator that a road should be tertiary instead of residential/unclassified.