piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
impiaaa (2025-09-07 04:58:49+00:00): Hello! Please include in your changeset note a description of what you changed and why. For example, "Added buildings, pitches, and driveways from imagery." More examples at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments . Thanks!
TinPetreković (2025-09-09 09:45:33+00:00): Reverting because of an unnecessary split #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171676056
mariotomo (2025-09-15 05:28:32+00:00): Hola y gracias por contribuir. Sugerencias: si haces un área, intenta si puedes completar. No utilices descripciones en el nombre del objeto. Estas casas tienen ángulos rectos, la tecla es la Q. Agrupa ediciones parecidas en un único conjunto de cambios, se hace más sencillo comentar.
mariotomo (2025-09-15 05:29:57+00:00): Ah, disculpa, lo agrupar lo hiciste muy bien. Gracias!
TinPetreković (2025-09-09 10:11:10+00:00): Reverting because of an unnecessary split #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171677207
TinPetreković (2025-09-11 11:50:08+00:00): Fixed in changeset 171780549

Segments merged back together
TinPetreković (2025-09-11 14:53:13+00:00): Fixed in changeset 171780549

Segments merged back together

http://openstreetmap.org/changeset/171780549
TinPetreković (2025-09-11 11:53:25+00:00): Fixed in changeset 171780658

Segments merged back together
TinPetreković (2025-09-11 14:53:41+00:00): Fixed in changeset 171780658

Segments merged back together

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171780658
wachsihh (2025-10-12 18:20:47+00:00): Moin,
ist der Weg an der Kupfermühle vorbei tatsächlich zugangsbeschränkt? Hier führt die Wanderroute 16 der Aktivregion Alsterland vorbei. Wie kommen die Gäste zum Restaurant?
Besten Dank für eine Antwort. ;-)
TinPetreković (2025-09-11 11:55:57+00:00): Fixed in changeset 171780741

Segments merged back together
TinPetreković (2025-09-11 14:54:22+00:00): Fixed in changeset 171780741

Segments merged back together

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171780741
TinPetreković (2025-09-11 12:03:49+00:00): Fixed in changeset 171781107

Segments merged back together
TinPetreković (2025-09-11 14:54:49+00:00): Fixed in changeset 171781107

Segments merged back together

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171781107#map=17/42.414168/-82.926931&layers=N
TinPetreković (2025-09-11 12:20:45+00:00): Fixed in changeset 171781853

Segments merged back together
TinPetreković (2025-09-11 14:55:09+00:00): Fixed in changeset 171781853

Segments merged back together

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171781853
gosgtan (2025-09-07 13:44:48+00:00): Bonjour, attention vous avez replacé un arrêt définitivement supprimé, "Arbel". Cf délib SMTD du 28/05/25
TinPetreković (2025-09-11 12:29:01+00:00): Fixed in changeset 171782204

Segments merged back together
TinPetreković (2025-09-11 14:55:27+00:00): Fixed in changeset 171782204

Segments merged back together

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171782204
alexey213 (2025-09-06 21:24:34+00:00): ой, ошибся. это вьзед в подземный паркинг, тогда шлагбаум есть!
Myazyk (2025-09-08 10:44:28+00:00): А чому видалив назви?
rempshaener (2025-09-07 08:02:13+00:00): Hallo,

du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Den Hintergrund deiner Idee verstehe ich, die Umsetzung funktioniert so allerdings nicht. Das „Überdecken“ einer vorhandenen Straßengeometrie mit einem zusätzlichen cycleway ist generell nicht richtig. Ein separater cycleway wäre richtig, wenn es sich um eine bauliche Trennung handelt.
Bitte nimm deine Änderungen zeitnah wieder zurück.
Zu deinem Routing-Problem: 
Die Trasse ist mit highway=busway und bicycle=yes erfasst. D. h. dein Router ist nicht in der Lage, den eher seltenen „busway“ richtig zu deuten. Bitte wende dich an den Hersteller der Software und weise ihn auf das Problem hin.

Bei Fragen bitte melden.
Viele Grüße
gerd951 (2025-09-07 08:55:46+00:00): Gut, ich weiß nicht, ob ich die Änderungen zurückzogen habe. Ich weiß nämlich nicht, wie das geht zurückziehen.
rempshaener (2025-09-07 09:28:44+00:00): Kein Problem, habe ich gerade angepasst.
Viele Grüße
d3mol3k (2025-09-15 19:34:09+00:00): A jak jest z dojazdem do posesji Aleja Powstańców Wielkopolskich 63; 65; 66? z tego co się orientuję to odcinek Alei powstańców Wielkopolskich na tym odcinku jest dojazdem do tych posesji pomiędzy Orawską a Frysztacką. Zmieniło się coś w tym temacie?
AndyB_66 (2025-09-24 19:13:53+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
d3mol3k (2025-09-28 19:57:37+00:00): tworzysz fikcyjne nazwy przystanków - zaprzestań takich działań
AntiCompositeNumber (2025-10-31 15:09:53+00:00): Hello, what is the source for these changes?
dkwolf (2025-10-31 17:14:57+00:00): I used several sources. Granit, Exeter town conservation commission and other town sources.
BCNorwich (2025-09-07 05:29:25+00:00): Hi, you've somehow mapped a lot of features near here that are not tagged. Could you please rectify this issue?

Regards Bernard
KindredCoda (2025-09-08 21:34:04+00:00): Yes, I will rectify this issue.

-Coda
rempshaener (2025-09-07 20:12:37+00:00): Hallo,

ich habe eine Anmerkung zu deinen Anpassungen: Hydranten sollten nicht mit Straßen, Gebäuden u. ä. verbunden werden. Das lässt sich leicht beheben: im Editor markieren und „E“ drücken – das löst den Hydranten von der Linie. Die betroffenen Objekte findest du hier: https://overpass-turbo.eu/?Q=%5Bout%3Ajson%5D%3B%0Aarea%5Bname%3D%22Deutschland%22%5D%3B%0Away%5Bhighway%5D%28area%29%28user%3AFlo0510%29%20-%3E%20.highways%3B%0Anode%5B%22emergency%22%3D%22fire_hydrant%22%5D%28w.highways%29%3B%0A%28._%3B%3E%3B%29%3B%0Aout%3B&C=52.191313%3B8.352068%3B13&R=

Viele Grüße
mcliquid (2025-09-14 16:27:50+00:00): Hi and thank you for your contribution!

Please note for the future: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
wombatmaper (2025-09-14 17:12:43+00:00): A single large changeset seems preferable to 250 individual changeset in this case.
mcliquid (2025-09-14 17:28:54+00:00): Maybe, but the Automated Edits CoC also applies here, which was definitely not observed - or where can I find the discussion about this in the community?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct
wombatmaper (2025-09-14 17:35:56+00:00): This feels like is falls under the "typo" exception: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct#Exceptions
mcliquid (2025-09-14 17:40:17+00:00): The only way to confirm your feeling would have been to ask the community. My main concern is that a changeset spanning three countries is simply unnecessarily large. It could have been divided into federal states in a maximum of 5 minutes and into districts in a maximum of 10 minutes.
wombatmaper (2025-09-14 17:45:28+00:00): I had already geographically limited this changeset to only the german speaking countries. I applied the same fix outside in smaller edits with more manual review.
wombatmaper (2025-09-14 17:48:06+00:00): Also asking the community if I need to ask the community to perform a changeset seems very... wierd? Why does that exception exist if I would need to do it anyway? This is also what has been confirmed to be in previous such edits: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/automatic-fixing-of-yes-to-yes-on-diet-vegan-and-diet-vegetarian/118329/11
mcliquid (2025-09-14 17:50:49+00:00): The exception applies to a typo, not a translation.
wombatmaper (2025-09-14 17:53:09+00:00): But it still seems clear what was meant right? Like what else can "grau" in the colour field mean?
mcliquid (2025-09-14 17:58:37+00:00): It could mean that the value itself was already incorrect and your change now implies that you have checked that it is now correct. One random example: Metal can have many colors, but this hydrant cover is not gray in any world: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12252900170
https://www.mapillary.com/app/user/WFOberweyer?menu=true&lat=50.4585118&lng=8.091218099999992&z=17&pKey=1624717521790760&focus=photo&x=0.5173033829709038&y=0.5068994507245498&zoom=1.6012900049542125
mcliquid (2025-09-14 18:01:45+00:00): I mean, check this one: https://www.mapillary.com/app/user/WFOberweyer?lat=50.46011149999998&lng=8.089372000000026&z=17&pKey=3934798130093284&focus=photo&menu=false&x=0.5228815101750337&y=0.516539112908242&zoom=2.907488871250912

It's definitely browner than any grey tones.
wombatmaper (2025-09-14 18:02:34+00:00): Hmm, I think my changeset comment makes it quite clear that I did not check it. 
Also any software that uses the colour field to render, will now correctly render this object, this allows users to more easily find this error, which would not have been visible before.
mcliquid (2025-09-14 18:24:28+00:00): Your changeset comment reads “corrected color "grau" -> "grey"” and it does not say that you did not check it.
In that case, it would have been better to delete the values instead of entering incorrect OTG, syntactically correct values. But that would also be suitable for a community discussion.
wombatmaper (2025-09-14 21:44:42+00:00): Hmm, my bad I also forgot to apply the mechanical=yes tag to this edit. I will also include this in future comments. But due to the description and size of the changeset (and the lack of source=survey) I thought it would be obvious.
Also the OTG was obviously already incorrect.
However removing all colour values, which have an obvious "correct" alternative, that other mappers have tagged seems needlessly destructive.
fs_LT (2025-09-16 04:32:46+00:00): what's the problem in asking the community and making smaller CS? The cited exception applies to a typo, not a translation.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171562549
wombatmaper (2025-09-16 11:31:24+00:00): I don't see a problem in making smaller CS, I just understood that this was what the community preferred, but I guess different users have different opinions on the matter. 
I will split up future similar edits, though I am not really planning on doing anything similar at the moment.
wombatmaper (2025-09-16 11:39:23+00:00): And while yes, this is not technically a typo, for me it has the same characteristics for the sake of automated edits:
- These data values are obviously incorrect and unsupported
- There is a "correct" replacement value
- It is clear that the user meant this other value
StC (2025-09-20 09:36:54+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changeset a brisé la continuité de plusieurs itinéraires pédestres, semble-t-il en rattachant des chemins directement à une super-relation. Je vais tenter la réparation.
StC (2025-09-20 11:56:51+00:00): En fait c'est plus compliqué que prévu : il y a deux chemins qui semblent connectés mais ne le sont pas, et une ligne sans tags qui vient se mélanger avec les chemins. Je m'y remets.
Sébastien Pi (2025-09-20 19:51:41+00:00): Besoin de renseignements ?
StC (2025-09-20 20:22:35+00:00): Non, merci. J'ai fini par me rendre compte qu'il y avait un chemin superposé avec un doublon de lui-même, connecté avec une simple ligne sans tags. Normalement c'est nettoyé maintenant.
tguen (2025-12-07 05:37:16+00:00): Please avoid using multipolygons unless they are really necessary. They make features harder to edit and in this case they provide no benefit.
ChillyDL (2025-09-13 15:14:52+00:00): Hallo NSG-engel, du hast die Namen der Großsteingräber "Am hohen Stein" und "Der hohe Stein" mit einander vertauscht. Warum? In der Fachliteratur heißen sie so wie davor, und die Fotos der Beschilderung auf Commons lauten ebenfalls so (die Gräber sind z.B. durch die Anzahl der Steine identifizierbar). Hat jemand vor Ort die Schilder vertauscht?
NGL-engel (2025-09-14 12:35:13+00:00):  Hallo ChillyDL, 
   ob die Schilder vor Ort vertauscht waren, kann ich dir leider nicht sagen. Sie sahen allerdings gut befestigt und unbeschädigt aus. Außerdem zeigen die beschrifteten Bilder auf Wikipedia genau den gleichen Sachverhalt: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gro%C3%9Fsteingr%C3%A4ber_in_Garen#Am_hohen_Stein. Also im Osten (auf einem kleinen Hügel) müsste sich das Grab „Der hohe Stein” (964) und 200 m weiter westlich das Grab „Am hohen Stein” (963) befinden. 
 – Würde auch insofern Sinn machen, als dass der Hohe Stein auch hoch (oben auf dem Hügelchen) ist.

Ich habe den Ersteller der ersten Eintragung angeschrieben, er wusste es nicht hundertprozentig. 

Deswegen nehme ich an, dass die erste Eintragung nicht korrekt war. 

Falls du jedoch andere/bessere Informationen hast, ändere es bitte wieder.
Gruß, NGL-Engel
PS.: Die Links zu den Wikipedia-Artikeln funktionieren auch nicht mehr alle. Das sollte man sich auch noch einmal anschauen.
ChillyDL (2025-09-14 17:58:55+00:00): Danke für deine sorgfältige Überprüfung! Da war einiges durcheinander, auch auf den zahlreichen Websites dazu und der Beschilderung vor Ort offenbar. Die Namen, wie du sie gesetzt hast stimmen, und der Rest jetzt auch.
Grüße!
NGL-engel (2025-09-15 19:04:30+00:00): Danke auch meinerseits! Ich freue mich immer wieder, wie gut die Zusammenarbeit auf OSM funktioniert.
B252697 (2025-09-06 23:36:22+00:00): If not the entire Caspian condo is covered by all these thick road displays and can be hard to view, especially at low zoom levels. I agree that roads are critical data, but their display should not come at the expense of almost completely obscuring the building and condo features (especially at low zoom levels)
Minh Nguyen (2025-09-14 14:56:07+00:00): This seem more like service=parking_aisle than service=driveway.
B252697 (2025-09-14 15:00:06+00:00): Hi @minh_nguyen, ok, thank you for letting me know!
Minh Nguyen (2025-09-14 15:09:10+00:00): Thank you for fixing it. 🙂
santamariense (2025-10-17 14:36:40+00:00): dclarks,

Tudo bem? A gente tem um problema neste segmento. pois se não deixar as vias marginais como trunk, se tem uma descontinuidade na malha viária, em ambos os sentidos [1] e [2]. Naturalmente os veículos precisam transitar pelas marginais para poder seguir viagem na rodovia.

Não faz sentido que o usuário da rodovia saia duma trunk, e tenha que passar por uma secondary para seguir viagem pela trunk novamente.

Por isso se faz necessário manter como trunk. 

[1] - https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_car&route=-27.057043%2C-52.636458%3B-27.066805%2C-52.635149#map=16/-27.06195/-52.63404&layers=N

[2] - https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_car&route=-27.066898%2C-52.634975%3B-27.056455%2C-52.636346#map=16/-27.06096/-52.63406&layers=N

santamariense
dclarks (2025-10-17 15:06:29+00:00): Olá, bem tranquilo, não sei as convenções usadas, fico confuso, só tenho mapeado conforme os dados que vou coletando, mas podem alterar conforme as convenções adequadas. Vou me atentar a isso nas proximas!
citrula (2025-09-07 19:19:01+00:00): Is this called "Austin Ranch" or "Ox Ranch"?
Warren Post (2025-09-07 14:26:25+00:00): I noticed that this edit removed the existing tags from ways 313497676, 313498425, 313497678. I've manually restored them on that way. The other ways may also be affected.
Warren Post (2025-09-07 15:53:30+00:00): Ditto way 313718336.
TrickyFoxy (2025-09-07 20:22:48+00:00): Use sandbox https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/
TrickyFoxy (2025-09-07 20:23:56+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171604188
Udarian (2025-09-07 01:28:20+00:00): please stop adding objects that are just one address tag and a name without any other tags to specify what it is.
Udarian (2025-09-07 03:56:46+00:00): next time please provide more address tags, especially the associated street of the address, and when you add a name to an address please add some tag describing what it is like office=*, amenity=* or any other such tags.

happy mapping,
Udar.
trial (2025-09-07 20:43:07+00:00): Can you explain your change? It's a roundabout with a priority for the bus.
It is NOT a circular.
trial (2025-09-07 21:09:25+00:00): Previous mapping WAS correct.
trial (2025-09-07 21:15:55+00:00): BTW, for the region, you should use PCRS, not Bing.
toponomastica_comune_arenzano (2025-09-08 14:08:02+00:00): reading this:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Circular_and_widened_road_features

Traffic routed in a circle, with a large, non-traversable centre island. However the circular traffic must yield for at least one, some or each entering road, thus not a roundabout.
cquest (2025-12-01 17:33:13+00:00): It may be more logical not to have any junction=* tag here, and simply oneway=yes
DressyPear4 (2025-09-07 23:33:56+00:00): Não remova proprietário das linhas de energia
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171565175
user_5359 (2025-09-07 07:17:03+00:00): Hello! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/7376173280 more than 100 meters. Please check the correct position
pankurs (2025-09-07 15:35:06+00:00): Ahhh, thank you for catching that! I was having trouble at the start trying to pan around without dragging things and I thought I caught all of them. I made sure to revert this. Thank you!
felipeeugenio (2025-09-07 12:01:30+00:00): HOla. Buen trabajo. Eso si porfa las vías agrícolas siempre con access=private y son su respectivo surface=

Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171565208
smallCat (2025-09-07 04:50:18+00:00): Hello alkino, West Lake is not the same as West Lake Cultural Landscape. The AAAAA tag should write in West Lake Cultural Landscape, not West Lake.
alkino (2025-09-07 06:07:33+00:00): Thanks for this. I don't know what is the west lane cultural landscape so. Can you do it if you have more information?

I'm trying to add all AAAAA sites in china. But as a foreigner we lacks informations.
If you want to take part of this we can have a discussion on the wiki.
Maarten Deen (2026-01-16 11:31:55+00:00): Hi, you changed the overhead voltage for some lines from 12.5 kV to 13 kV. Are you sure that's correct?
RailandSea (2026-01-16 15:04:57+00:00): Yea the book says:
SYSTEM VOLTAGES
Catenary (Trolley) 13,000 Volts AC – 60 Hertz
Catenary (Feeders) 13,000 Volts AC – 60 Hertz
Third Rail 700 Volts DC
Maarten Deen (2026-01-16 15:42:55+00:00): Ok, then maybe it should be changed for the whole network.
RailandSea (2026-01-16 16:06:58+00:00): I was working my way east with the other updates including the voltage change but someone else reverted the voltage back a few months ago.
Living_man Singapura (2025-09-07 13:35:58+00:00): bismillahirRahmaanirRaheem, make surface of advanced protest writing for easy reach for any1 walking the Republik https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171396760#c1483210  ;
Notice to action taken bcos that writing is no longer front facing (i.o.w buried),  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171490258#c1483584   ;
 AlhamdullilahirRabil'aalaameen❗❕
Glassman (2025-09-07 20:53:34+00:00): If you switch over to Esri World Imagery, you can see many of the houses as well as roads.  To switch imagery in the editor, select the background layer then just hit the ESRI World Imagery. Now you can add the actual building to size.

Also, please don't add personal information to OSM for you and your families safety.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171566199
ChrisWray (2025-09-07 22:54:25+00:00): Is there a way to remove that comment since it does have that personal info? Also is there a way to change my username to something less identifiable? Didn't realize would be public
Glassman (2025-09-07 23:46:46+00:00): The only way to remove the changeset comment is to redact the edit. I'm happy to do that if that is what you request.

to change your user name, go to My Profile, upper right, select My Account there you can change your display name. I will say, a lot of people use their real name but if you want more protection, then that isn't a bad idea. Your original user name will exist forever but only your current user name will show on your future edits.
ChrisWray (2025-09-08 02:22:28+00:00): Thanks I think I'll leave it I guess
Living_man (2025-09-08 09:11:27+00:00): I step forth to motion for the redaction of personal info on changesets , with high regards to privacy for all. Mr Glassman, good sir  please redact https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171566199 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171565880 with more generic ones.. this is my request to redact personal info. Let public onlookers learn the lesson if they recognise it.

By my Living hands,
Living_man (Austin, Travis County, United State of America mapper)
ChrisWray (2025-09-08 12:33:40+00:00): That sounds good
Glassman (2025-09-08 18:43:22+00:00): I believe you should be good now. I also went and fixed the house outlines. Feel free to work on the rest. The City of Pasco has a good database of house numbers. https://maps-cityofpasco.hub.arcgis.com/apps/389edcfba6324ad48c147aa1d25c6878/explore
user_5359 (2025-09-07 07:08:03+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/11880087824
 more than 100 meters. Please check the correct position
Udarian (2025-09-07 16:01:53+00:00): as with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171522294 in this changeset you added something tagged as a footway but based on the imagery it looks like a bike lane, so is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1427629238 a bike lane or are pedestrians also allowed to walk on it.
SurfBalBay News (2025-09-07 16:42:51+00:00): The town treats the green painted ways as the pedestrian sidewalk. Bikes & such are to be on the road.
Udarian (2025-09-07 17:06:18+00:00): so, just to clarify the bikes share lanes with cars, aka cycleway=shared_lane would be applicable, is that correct?
for context the relevant wiki page would be https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cycleway%3Dshared_lane.
SurfBalBay News (2025-09-07 17:24:05+00:00): Exactly. That is how the town tells me the roads operate.
Udarian (2025-09-07 17:47:00+00:00): Ok, I implemented a fix in 171597335, but I am not 100% sure of the tagging of the footways so I have brought it up in the OSMUS slack: https://osmus.slack.com/archives/C6E4S4CQG/p1757267057670689
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2025-09-07 04:55:20+00:00): Revert log can been seen at https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/TQvQWsjx43/
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-11 04:31:43+00:00): Cleaned up remaining SEO spam and fixed other tagging for Dogtopia POI in changeset 183951713

https://osm.org/changeset/183951713
Cucazer (2025-09-11 09:29:00+00:00): Hi,
this sidewalk was already marked with sidewalk tags on the roads https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1291343766, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1001384486 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23612173.
Colbertson (2025-09-11 12:55:43+00:00): Fixed. Added "sidewalk:right/left=seperate" to the roads.
literan (2025-09-07 11:21:13+00:00): тег landuse=forest, пожалуйста, не используйте. В России для древесных насаждений следует использовать тег natural=wood

здесь исправлю
randomaper (2025-09-09 15:22:23+00:00): Ok
HellMap (2025-09-07 15:02:45+00:00): Sveiki,

Kāpēc tieši šeit nevarētu apgriezties? Nepārtrauktās līnijas te nav. Aizliegumi ar ceļa zīmēm arī šeit nav.
user_23259244 (2025-09-07 19:18:08+00:00): Īsti nevar saprast par kuru punktu iet runa, bet liekas tā ir tā vieta kur pēc 20m var droši apgriezties pūces-stirnu ielas krustojumā.
56.957340,24.183154 ja jūs domājat šeit, tad tur īsti nav iespējams apgriezties pretējā virzienā droši.