piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
TheGreenOne (2024-07-16 09:16:12+00:00): I have reverted your recent edits due to potential vandalism. Please ensure your contributions adhere to OSM guidelines. If this was an error, let's discuss.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154005271
eggie (2024-06-10 08:53:02+00:00): Dag Ytrog  

Alleen een naam doet niets in OSM  Ook de aard van de instelling zul je moeten bijtaggen.
Misschien hier eens kijken..
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:office
MVG
eggie
derlausitzer (2024-06-24 16:58:49+00:00): Die Baustelle ist beendet.
infeeeee (2024-06-10 13:13:26+00:00): Hello Welcome to OpenStreetMap!

In Hungary please use Hungarian or English changeset comments.

It seems you added non existent features, so I will revert this changeset. 

If you have any questions, please contact the Hungarian community:

- via the mailing list: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-hu
- via the matrix group: https://riot.grin.hu/#/room/#osm:grin.hu
- or via the forum: https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/hu/103
infeeeee (2024-06-10 13:14:09+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152497682
martien-176 (2024-08-05 09:56:21+00:00): Hi,

Waterways have been added level tags. I guess to prevent conflicts with crossing roads.

The correct way to solve this is adding culvert or bridge combined with the layer tag.

Best regards, Martien, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152486444
Vinber-Pro (2024-06-10 15:02:10+00:00): Bonjour,
les noms sont descriptif, mis dans description donc :)
Est-ce dans la cour  les 2 terrains ?

Est-ce la mairie de Ogenne-Camptort qui en a la gestion ?

à plus
CCBG enfance - jeunesse (2024-06-11 09:02:48+00:00): Bonjour, 
Les 2 équipements sont effectivement gérés par la municipalité  d'Ogenne -Camport. A priori, oui, foot et basket se pratiquent sur ce même terrain.
NieWnen (2024-06-16 10:59:37+00:00): Samochody jadą przez płot? Warto przy zmianie organizacji ruchu patrzeć na takie rzeczy i je również poprawiać :)
NieWnen (2024-06-16 10:59:42+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152755466
magik1969 (2024-09-14 18:43:39+00:00): Hej, uświadom mnie proszę, czy korektę klasy dróg leśnych robisz zawsze na podstawie obserwacji drogi w terenie?
Smk___________ (2024-09-14 19:26:00+00:00): Hej, Tak zawsze zmieniam po wizycie w danym regionie. Jak zauważam jakieś nieścisłości to koryguje. Szczególnie cenne jest info gdzie w lesie jest utwardzana droga a gdzie nie aby łatwiej planować trasy na rower. Zawsze tego mi brakuje i staram się uzupełniać szczególnie dla mniej uczęszczanych tras
magik1969 (2024-09-14 20:14:34+00:00): Dlaczego drogę https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/170077297
 , która jest jedną z lepszych dróg leśnych jakimi ostatnio jechałem (przyzwoicie ubity szuter na całej szerokości drogi) otagowałeś jako grade2, a drogę 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1290858155 , która też jest wprawdzie żwirowa ale już z pasem trawy pośrodku, otagowałeś jako grade1?
Smk___________ (2024-09-14 22:09:46+00:00): Nie jestem nieomylny. Mogłem coś pomieszać / źle zapamietac. Popraw proszę jak są jakieś nieścisłości ku chwale lepszych map!
eggie (2024-06-10 09:11:49+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback  Tip.. Voeg ook toe emergency =ambulance_station

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Benoît C MdP (2024-06-11 08:08:19+00:00): La zone n'est plus accessible. Même aux piétons. J'ai corrigé.

Bonne continuation

Benoît
NorthCrab_upload (2024-06-10 09:11:03+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11345043890
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1290860982

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
JulesGabrielVerne (2025-11-29 17:44:31+00:00): Za jakiej racji ulica Inwalidzka to Residental? Żadne auto osobowe nie przejedzie tą drogą
eggie (2024-06-10 09:15:55+00:00): Dag Eric   Klopt de oneway=yes hier wel ivm met dat give way? 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-06-10 09:18:22+00:00): Wanneer hulpdiensten tegen het verkeer in mogen gaan dan oneway:emergency=no
VRNHN Eric Kramer (2024-06-10 09:23:19+00:00): Ik weet niet exact waarom er voor gekozen is om er een oneway van te maken op deze locatie in beginsel. Staan geen borden op het terrein zelf, alleen oprit en afrit zijn eenrichtingsverkeer door de aanliggende kareldoormanweg.
De tussenweg richting de touwslagersweg bevat geen borden voor eenrichting, alleen suggestie dmv doorlopende haaientanden. Verkeer gebruikt dit punt ook als tweerichtingen dagdagelijks. 

Optie om stuk wegdeel als tweerichtingsverkeer te veranderen of zo te laten en oneway:emergency=no zoals suggestie.
eggie (2024-06-10 09:35:52+00:00): Formeel is er op het terrein van het tankstation ook geen eenrichtingsverkeer. 
In de praktijk geldt dat natuurlijk wel. 
Dat geldt alleen op de oprit vanaf de K Doormanweg het terrein op. Niet helemaal dichtgetimmerd hier  :)
Routeren voor regulier verkeer om vanuit de ventweg de K Doormanweg op te gaan via deze sluipweg werkt in ieder geval niet.
eggie (2024-06-10 09:37:18+00:00): Het enige dat nog niet werkt is de rendering op de standaardkaart, maar dat is een keuze van de kaartenmaker. Het staat wel in de data van OSM.
eggie (2024-06-10 09:39:00+00:00): Beste Erik access=no icm net andere accesstags is bijna altijd fout.
Waarom hier algemeen Verboden Toegang?
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=152487913

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-06-10 10:09:12+00:00): access=no verwijderd
mtmail (2026-05-15 11:10:12+00:00): Ich sehe eine Strasse "Halle-Kasseler-Straße" in Breitenvorbis aber nicht in Kirchworbis. War hier "Hauptstrasse gemeint"?
tst1979 (2026-05-15 11:45:46+00:00): Danke, für den Hinweis.
Da hatte ich bestimmt noch die falsche Straße als Vorlage drin. 
Korrgiert!
mtmail (2026-05-15 13:26:19+00:00): Super. Ich habe es auf https://nominatim.org/qa/#map=11.28/51.37/10.26&layer=addr_street_wrong_name gefunden
Warin61 (2024-06-11 01:45:58+00:00): Hi,
How about this? 
When you enter a new bus route, untill it complies, or as near as you can get it, with public transport version 2 you leave the tag for public transport version 2 out of it? That way the QA tools won't pick it up and it won't annoy me...
Lockstar (2024-06-11 05:00:42+00:00): OK - agreed.  I'll leave the v2 tag off new routes until I'm completely finished and satisfied it's compliant.  Sometimes there's a time gap from when I start entering to when I finish, unfortunately.  Cheers.
Warin61 (2024-06-11 07:07:00+00:00): Me too with the time gap. I've done a tree area in WA that is wrong - imagery shows the old fire damage so I've map that .. need to change it to a more realistic area as trees have regrown... been a week or 2..
TheSwavu (2024-06-10 09:34:16+00:00): Also removed a whole pile of traffic_signals=signal due to a JOSM search and replace error.

Sorry.
aTarom (2024-06-10 15:28:17+00:00): Bienvenido, qué tiene de incorrecto el name:ca en
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/626949776/history
para eliminarlo?
se debe respetar el historial en la medida de lo posible y no borrar para redibujar, se edita no se elimina
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/587894645/history
por
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1290867612/history
Por qué desplazar nodos place tan poca distancia?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1241943634/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1241949164/history
Los comentarios en los changesets deben ser descriptivos y ajustarse a los cambios realizados.
Espero respuesta por favor...
nevw (2024-07-12 23:36:10+00:00): Hi, I notice a lot of loops in the PNG 
https://waterwaymap.org/loops#map=7.7/-4.244/142.534
These are almost all errors caused by mapping waterways as flowing upstream.
Waterways always should be drawn to flow downstream.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:waterway
Are your teams able to notify your mappers thanks.
JeroenHoek (2024-06-10 09:45:35+00:00): Dit herstelt de schade uit deze changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146248334
NeisBot (2024-06-10 10:03:24+00:00): Hi MapExplorer24, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 93% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=152488808
HAmap (2024-06-10 15:40:29+00:00): Wiederhergestellt, weil die Fläche das Autobahndreieck abbildet
TrickyFoxy (2024-06-13 19:12:35+00:00): Не пишите в name пояснения. Для этого есть note и description
eggie (2024-06-10 10:12:28+00:00): De juiste tag zou dan moeten zijn oneway:emergency=no

Kijk nog even

Geen idee of jullie routing app dat ondersteunt. Ik zie mappers voor LiveNav dat regelmatig gebruiken.
eggie (2024-06-10 10:16:59+00:00): Nog wat leesvoer.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Hulpdiensten
Niet alle tagging voor emergency staat gedocumenteerd.
eggie (2024-06-10 11:37:20+00:00): Ik heb het aangepast
mcliquid (2024-06-25 08:28:21+00:00): Just out of interest, is there a wiki page with discussion on your mechanical edits? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/What%27s_the_problem_with_mechanical_edits%3F
Lezurex (2024-07-01 13:22:45+00:00): No, there isn't any, despite being advised by DWG to do so (https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16169). User is seemingly also not responding to any comments here.
Edu1981 (2024-06-11 00:42:59+00:00): muy buena informacion www.mariachisdemedellin.com.co
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-03 11:00:41+00:00): Hello!

You used
colour=weiß
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11968654444/history

Have you maybe meant
colour=white
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
Syl (2024-06-10 10:49:59+00:00): Hello, I don't see these service roads in BDOrtho IGN. It only seems to be space between stuff and there is impassable white stripe where you added junctions.
MappingMore (2024-06-11 10:01:18+00:00): Thank you Syl for your valuable feedback. I have made the corrections by removing the superflous geometry as per your suggestions. I will be more cautious while performing the edits going further.
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-10 14:12:47+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/152491149
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-10 14:12:33+00:00): Revert of https://osm.org/changeset/152491032
Frans S (2024-06-16 10:09:19+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Inaccurate mapped.
Buildings not squared.
Connected nodes of buildings to each other.

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152491533
NorthCrab_upload (2024-06-10 11:00:18+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11968647813
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/445105913

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2024-06-10 11:00:17+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4041933059
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/445105888

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
mcliquid (2024-06-25 08:26:37+00:00): Has this mechanical edit been discussed in the community?
Anas masuris (2024-06-27 09:01:44+00:00): Nie wiem, gdzie wyczytałeś, że niby stacja podpada pod light_rail=yes, ale jest to błąd. Wycofałem
Asteliks (2024-06-27 10:28:50+00:00): Ze stacji Warszawa Zachodnia poza WKD korzysta też Szybka Kolej Miejska, którą kwalifikujemy jako kolej miejską (lekką). Link do tras SKM: https://www.skm.warszawa.pl/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/SKM_KOREKTA-SCHEMATU_MAJ_3_BIG-scaled.jpg
mcliquid (2024-06-25 08:26:32+00:00): Has this mechanical edit been discussed in the community?
tux67 (2024-06-10 12:38:19+00:00): Hi - schade "Naturschutzegbiet" erinnerte ein bisschen an Jar Jar Binks aus StarWars 😉😉;-)

Gruß
tux67
stoni100 (2024-06-10 13:00:57+00:00): Adlerauge :-).... aber du kannst es ja wieder reinschreiben .... dann war ich es nicht ;-)
JIFFNET (2024-12-09 22:47:47+00:00): Czy na pewno szlak przebiega powyżej dolnego płaju? Jest to potwierdzone z BgPN? Na ich stronie są sprzeczne informacje: https://bgpn.gov.pl/mapa-parku
https://bgpn.gov.pl/turystyka
emarv (2024-12-10 08:00:52+00:00): Opierałem się mapie z oficjalnej strony https://bgpn.gov.pl/szlaki-turystyczne, ale rzeczywiście https://bgpn.gov.pl/mapa-parku przedstawia inny przebieg. Mapa turystyczna podaje ten drugi wariant. Podejrzewam, że jest w takim razie bardziej wiarygodny. Niestety nie jestem w stanie zweryfikować w terenie.
Merlin13245 (2024-06-10 14:05:45+00:00): Great edit, Thanks for contributing to the map!
Francesco Zanaboni (2024-06-13 12:49:50+00:00): changeset #1000
aTarom (2024-06-10 14:10:53+00:00): hola, quan puguis mira aquest tag
"reservoir_type:"
a
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/771396924/history
dubto si falta el "-2022" o no
Salutacions
blacx (2024-06-10 15:32:51+00:00): ugh, m'he deixat d'esborrar el ":", ara ho arreglo
mcliquid (2024-06-25 08:26:07+00:00): Has this mechanical edit been discussed in the community? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct
Colbertson (2024-06-25 12:29:36+00:00): These are rather basic, small fixes (even if they cover a large area with a large amount of nodes). 
Ive discussed it some in the OSM World discord, nobody seems to mind.
The previous tagging was basically useless so i dont see an issue with fixing it.
mcliquid (2024-06-25 12:42:20+00:00): Regardless of the size of the changes, wouldn't you agree that this is a mechanical edit and therefore should have been agreed with the global community including the wiki page?
Friendly_Ghost (2024-06-25 14:38:04+00:00): Stop being such a stickler for rules just for the sake of it. Nobody besides Frederik Ramm appreciates you when you're doing that, and you're not making the map/database any better. This is just a fix of obvious tag errors; there's no need to bog people down with endless documentation.
mcliquid (2024-06-25 15:19:42+00:00): I'm terribly sorry, I never wanted to bother you.
Lumikeiju (2024-06-25 19:19:07+00:00): Hi - I just wanted to chime in and add my support for these types of tagging fixes. Genus/species/taxon tagging is an absolute mess, and changes like this ("species=Tilia sp." -> "genus=Tilia") help to clean that up. Thanks!
eggie (2024-06-10 12:55:10+00:00): Welkom bij OSM

De info heb ik samengevoegd met de adresnode. Ongeldige tagging verwijderd.
openingstijden fixed.
No advertising

The description should only include neutral and factual information about the object. It should not include subjective evaluations, e.g. "the best restaurant in town", "modern, comfortable hotel, in the heart of the city". Do not use description=* for advertising messages. They will be removed as spam and may also have further consequences for your OSM account. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-06-10 12:58:55+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Geen idee of openable werkt? 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
IrenevanderZwan (2024-06-10 13:17:43+00:00): Bedankt, Ik heb instructies gekregen*) om de tab Emergency op 'yes' te zetten.
*) van LiveOp, een software ontwikkelaar die OSM gebruikt voor navigatiesoftware voor de hulpdiensten.
mvg
Irene
eggie (2024-06-10 13:03:03+00:00): 
Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
feedback Voeg toe crossing_ref=zebra 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
MxxCon (2024-06-18 00:36:51+00:00): Hello.
Instead of outright deleting a closed biz, it's much better to use proper lifecycle tags. Doing that not only preserves a history of that object, but still allows that address to be searchable and routable.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152494687
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-31 17:49:43+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11968870852/history has fixme:type = shop that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What kind of shop is here?

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop for common values - is any of them fitting?
silversurfer83 (2024-06-10 19:03:06+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OSM :)

schön, dass Ihr euch hier einbringt und nach Eurem Laden seht.

Falls ihr Fragen zu allem hier habt, einfach raus damit. Entweder direkt oder unter c.osm.org

cheers
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152495205
Filip009 (2024-06-12 20:04:13+00:00): Zdravím, neviem ako to je v Organic Maps s presetmi, ale Packeta má svoj preset, aby sa jednoduchšie tagovala. Dá sa pri vyhľadávaní vyhľadať priamo Packeta Z-box?
TYAS123 (2024-06-19 23:29:31+00:00): Vďaka, opravil som to cez webovú verziu.
Nakaner (2024-09-22 22:07:00+00:00): Hallo,

ich stand heute am unteren Ende des von dir bearbeiteten Wegs, weil meine mit bikerouter.de geplante Gravel-Route mich dort hochschicken wollte. Spontan habe ich mich dann für einen anderen Weg entschieden und kann dein Tagging mit tracktype=grade2 nicht nachvollziehen.

Ich nehme mal an, dass du die Klassifikations-Kriterien für tracktype=* (wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:tracktype) kennst. Heißt das, dass der Weg weiter oben besser ausgebaut ist?

Mit meinem flüchtiger Blick am unteren Ende hätte ich ihn als grade4 eingestuft.

Viele Grüße

Michael
akimapbuilder (2024-06-10 13:28:42+00:00): Hi! I had to revert your changeset since there is no building in sight.
38JZHG7KN4 (2024-06-13 03:29:50+00:00): Yes, it appeared to me and I must put something or else I couldn't draw
akimapbuilder (2024-06-13 06:43:46+00:00): Hi! Great to hear back from you! 
When you are working on challenges, there is a Skip option in the top left corner of the map builder interface. After that you can choose one from the following: Incorrect suggested object, The object is blurry, Already completed and None of the above.
Happy maping
Marcos Medeiros (2024-06-10 12:38:37+00:00): Nodos duplicados, restricción de conversión, edificios superpuestos, cruce entre edificio y carretera, nodo sin etiquetar
bxl-forever (2024-06-10 12:54:24+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM.
Please be extremely careful when dealing with addresses, it looks like you are creating duplicate values of the same addresses.  Also, if you use the simple online editor, please do not fill the fields with postcodes and city names, we do not fill those values in Belgium (they are already calculated through existing zones).
Merlin13245 (2024-06-10 14:04:41+00:00): What is #ILMXMSF? A quick online search didn't lead me to find anything useful. You might want to see this guide on good changeset comments (good comments help reviewers and provide a better history of what has happened to the map).
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

It also looks like the areas you created don't line up with the physical buildings on aerial imagery. I would recommend going through the training on how to use the map editor - it will teach you about the mindset of mappers in addition to how to use the tools.

Thanks for contributing to the map! Happy mapping :)
Tomas Straupis (2024-06-11 17:21:41+00:00): tertiary yra krašto keliai (na arba didžiuosiuose miestuose jungiamieji). Tai ties Subaciškėm grąžinau unclassified. O kadangi unclassified yra jungiamasis, tai ir per Subaciškes grąžinau unclassified, nes to reikia grafo korektiškumui. living street info perkėliau į atskirą žymą living_street=yes.
Litawor (2024-06-12 05:34:03+00:00): Turbūt gerai padarei. Gatvė Subačiškėse pažymėta ženklais "Gyvenamoji zona", todėl ten tikrai living_street.
Tomas Straupis (2024-06-12 06:32:15+00:00): Taip, mes kažkada Vilniuje (Užupyje?) aiškinomės, ką daryti su šituo. Ten du dalykai kertasi: kelių hierarchija ir lokalūs eismo ribojimai. Tai living_street kaip ir duoda lokalius kelio apribojimus, bet jos klasifikacija yra gerokai per žema ir tada jungiamasis kelias, kaip kad čia yra, gauna trūkį, kas negerai grafui.
bxl-forever (2024-06-10 12:56:13+00:00): According to UrbisAdm, this large building is made of 3 parts, each with a different ref:UrbIS tag.  I will care to fix this.
Also, please observe that buildings should *never* be traced on aerial imagery; those images present a distorted view of reality; always use the appropriate numerical imagery if you want to trace this.
I will try to fix this too.
Frans S (2024-08-06 10:23:28+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
A: Inaccurate mapping.
E: Buildings not squared.


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152496702
Frans S (2024-08-19 09:26:06+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
Issues found on your mappings

A: Inaccurate mapping.

B: Overlapping buildings.

C: Collecting adjacent buildings and mapped is as 1 building.
E: Buildings not squared.


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152497026
Dodko (2024-08-18 12:13:09+00:00): Aký je otvárací čas?