piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2026-01-15 18:23:37+00:00): Schade hersteld
iandees (2026-01-15 18:32:39+00:00): Hi, thanks for adding to the map. Please note that this sort of information doesn't fit in OpenStreetMap. If there's a memorial or physical presence that others can confirm (like the George Floyd memorial/square), that's the appropriate thing to include in OSM. If you're just trying to show other folks what's going on, you might want to check out https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/. I will delete this.
GerdP (2026-01-16 06:45:44+00:00): Moin aus Wildeshausen!
Könntest Du bitte bei Deinen Änderungen einen Kommentar zur Quelle angeben? Wenn Du die Daten vor Ort selbst gesammelt hast, dann reicht "survey", falls Du die Daten aber z.B. aus der jetzt als Quelle erlaubten Karte des LGLN (ALKIS) kopierst, dann sollte das irgendwo in der Quellenangabe auftauchen. Man kann bei JOSM diesen Kommentar automatisch generieren lassen aus den aktiven Hintergrundlayern.
trial (2026-07-20 08:59:53+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/746688952/history : joli : un gars qui casse les horaires en v6, tu vas pouvoir les remettre.
eggie (2026-01-15 18:30:57+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-01-15 18:27:47+00:00): Dit lijkt me toch echt meer een tuin. De parking staat getekend over de woning?
MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-01-15 18:28:37+00:00): Parking verwijderd  Esri is outdated.
eggie (2026-01-15 18:34:25+00:00): Dag Nixxlemans   Is het een minibieb of heeft deze ook Minibieb..
In het eerste geval geen naam toevoegen.

MVG
eggie
Nizzlemans (2026-01-16 10:14:44+00:00): Hoi,

Is een minibieb, ik heb de naam verwijderd (denk ik) en zal even kijken of ik het ergens anders ook zo had gedaan. Dank voor het nakijken!

groet,
Nizzlemans
eggie (2026-01-16 10:58:21+00:00): 👍
Marvk (2026-04-16 16:03:51+00:00): Hi osmmapper222, 

hast du die Solarpanele im Solarpark Groß Munzel mit Absicht building=yes getaggt, oder war das ein Versehen. Es folgt zumindest nicht den Guidelines im Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:generator:source%3Dsolar#Solar_park/solar_farm

Beste Grüße
osmmapper222 (2026-04-16 18:48:53+00:00): Hallo marvk,

guter Einwand. Die Grundrisse der Panele habe ich mittels dem zzbuildings-Plugin aus dem ALKIS übernommen. Dabei scheint buildings=yes automatisch gesetzt worden zu sein.

Im ALKIS mag es ein freistehendes Panel als Gebäude hinterlegt sein, in OSM macht es aber wenig Sinn.

Soll ich den Tag buildings=yes von den Panelen entfernen?
Marvk (2026-04-16 18:54:12+00:00): Würde ich vorschlagen, und dann noch location=roof zu location=surface

Danke!
osmmapper222 (2026-04-16 19:25:15+00:00): ist angepasst
eggie (2026-01-15 18:26:05+00:00): De parking heb ik van het gebouw gehaald.
Kijk hier hoe een parkeerstrook te mappen.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:parking%3Dstreet_side

MVG
eggie
ScrawnyMeowth1 (2026-01-17 02:26:58+00:00): Hello trailrunner13,

I've noticed that a lot of your changesets have similar and somewhat vague comments. It helps other mappers if you leave a comment that includes what you're editing, and the rough geographic area of your edits. Thanks!
trailrunner13 (2026-01-17 13:39:02+00:00): I am doing bulk tagging updates by hand for schools and school district offices across OR and WA... hundreds so far. The edits are mostly adding or updating address tags (and other metadata) to existing ways / nodes and/or adding new school district office nodes. Doing this manually to avoid any duplication is extremely time consuming and it would be made even more-so if I were to add changeset-specific notes for every edit, but I will see what I can do. Thanks for the feedback.
NeisBot (2026-01-15 18:26:16+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your changesets and noticed that the cumulative count of your recent edits (2 changesets) shows that 442 of your last 510 changes were deletions. This is quite an unusual proportion, so I wanted to check with you.

Could you please confirm whether these deletions were intentional or if they may have occurred by mistake?

#DeletionsCheck #Cumulative
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?uid=23713700
African_Pike_2014 (2026-01-15 19:06:44+00:00): Hello NeisBot

yes, this was absolutely deliberate.
The current mapping is completely out-of-date in this building area.
I already added al the current roads and tracks.
Thanks.
pitscheplatsch (2026-01-17 08:09:17+00:00): Thank you for your reply.
Martin Borsje (2026-01-22 20:36:29+00:00): Jan, je hebt bij de ex Brand Bierbrouwerij te Wijlre stroragetanks ingetekend, gebaseerd op een oudere foto. De brouwerij is grotendeels gesloopt, evenals de gistingstanks. Ik haal ze weg.
JanWandelaar (2026-01-23 16:31:21+00:00): Bedankt!
Storage tanks worden momenteel weer veel uit de BAG verwijderd, terwijl ze er nog wel staan. Ik haal de building informatie weg en zet er man_made op (als ze te zien zijn op de luchtfoto).
Martin Borsje (2026-01-23 16:44:37+00:00): De tanks staan er niet meer! Op de foto staat de fundering nog; die is inmiddels ook weg :)
MassCartog (2026-01-15 19:24:58+00:00): user states this is gone.
Yog Sot (2026-01-15 23:24:48+00:00): Ja wiem.... że wymiana zdań jest trudna
Poznań ma wpisane upamiętnienie śladu średzkiej kolei w Studium Uwarunkowań i ślad ten jest zachowywany w postaci brukowanego śladu. Jest to dostrzegalne bardzo wyraźnie na zdjęciach z poziomu ulicy. To nie jest łatwe do mapowania na ten moment dlatego ta linia po południowej stronie jeziora to był jedyny sposób. 
Naturalnie tutaj ślady się kończą. 
Tyle, wracam do swoich drzew.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-01-16 08:58:24+00:00): Czy to dotyczy jakiśch elementów skasowanych w tej edycji?

Jak tak to których?

(patrz też https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154684137 )
Yog Sot (2026-01-16 10:39:15+00:00): to skasuję:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1305007726
to odkasuję: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1340879028 az do Katowickiej
to również odkasuję poza obszarem skrzyżowania:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/266254484
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-01-16 15:07:04+00:00): dzięki!
Luke_Vader (2026-01-15 22:14:49+00:00): Please tag your sources in the future
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177270928
pwbriggs (2026-01-15 20:08:57+00:00): Thanks for adding this!
literan (2026-04-15 06:56:37+00:00): здравствуйте. Подскажите, а откуда здесь взялся брод? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13458650038/history

там или труба или мост, но никак не брод. Или там что-то изменилось?
YomanNH (2026-01-15 19:23:32+00:00): Cześć, sprawdziłeś to w terenie, albo w jakichś innych wiarygodnych źródłach? Bo anonimowe zgłoszenie wcale nie musi być zgodne z prawdą.
TrickyFoxy (2026-01-16 14:31:48+00:00): А что это за руины? https://osm.org/node/13458665402
gabro00 (2026-01-16 16:20:04+00:00): Szerintem ilyenkor mehet a levesbe a payment, nyitvatartás és a fb oldal is, meg ami a szolgáltatáshoz tartozott.
CopperOppositeKindred (2026-01-16 16:26:03+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177305412
granitschädel (2026-03-01 13:07:57+00:00): Hello timichal
"visible on orthomaps" is not a veritable source. Orthophotos are a help, but OSM lives from verification on site. Správa železnic has done works in 2025, some tracks are abandoned since then, also because line to Svojšín has lost public transport.
timichal (2026-03-01 13:18:09+00:00): Hi, I understand about the orthophotos, but transport on the line to Svojšín is indeed scheduled similarly to previous years: see https://www.spravazeleznic.cz/documents/50004227/184392685/k186.pdf/e826db2c-6be7-41f9-9b16-f8d90550d4de, also in live timetables.
RedGreenBlue09 (2026-01-15 19:31:48+00:00): Hi, can you read the discussion https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177190891? I have a reason to make this particular one (ĐT.771) primary.
NinoNinata (2026-01-15 19:37:00+00:00): Bạn nhìn sang hướng Cái Mép - Thị Vải, có nhiều đoạn họ làm tới 4 làn nhưng họ chỉ để đường lớn, không phải đường chính
RedGreenBlue09 (2026-01-15 19:41:19+00:00): Hiện tại họ để gì ko có nghĩa là đúng. ĐT.771 là tuyến đường kết nối Biên Hòa, cảng Phước An và có lưu lượng rất lớn.
RedGreenBlue09 (2026-01-15 19:42:51+00:00): Cả trong thành phố cũng có những tuyến đường như đường Võ Văn Kiệt mặc dù không chính thức là đường quốc lộ nhưng họ vẫn để trunk đó thôi. Quan trọng là những tuyến đường này kết nối các trung tâm lớn của tỉnh, không thể để secondary.
NinoNinata (2026-01-15 19:48:17+00:00): Tại vì hiện nay còn có cả quốc lộ thứ yếu, thành ra khi sử dụng primary sẽ có xung đột giữa QL với ĐT ấy. Ở khu vực miền trung họ tách ra rất rõ ràng. Có một số tp có trục 3 làn khá đông xe nhưng họ không dùng primary, họ vẫn để secondary đó thôi
NinoNinata (2026-01-15 19:50:09+00:00): Cái mình nói ở đây ấy, là lạm dụng cái primary nhiều quá. Nhìn vào nó không được đẹp cho lắm
RedGreenBlue09 (2026-01-15 19:53:44+00:00): Theo tôi vấn đề xung đột này ko thành vấn đề lớn vì ref vẫn đc hiện trên bản đồ. Mà dù gì ở đây tôi cũng phân biệt rất rõ giữa các loại đường tỉnh khác nhau chứ không edit ngẫu nhiên như ở khu vực Bắc Ninh. Nếu edit có chọn lọc thì nó vẫn có tính tương phản và thể hiện đúng tầm quan trọng của đường.

Còn các tuyến đường 3 làn trong thành phố để secondary là do những đường này có tính chất nội bộ. Các tuyến kết nối lớn đều để primary.
RedGreenBlue09 (2026-01-15 20:01:24+00:00): Tôi hiểu bạn lo ở Nhơn Trạch có quá nhiều tuyến primary. Nhưng tôi nghĩ cũng đúng thôi vì đây là KCN lớn, xung quanh là sân bay, cảng lớn, cửa ngõ TP.HCM và TP. Biên Hòa nên có nhiều tuyến trục cũng dễ hiểu.
NeisBot (2026-01-17 16:31:38+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13351803379 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Auto repair shop in Guttenberg IA"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-25 08:57:53+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177672924
(No visible changes after review)
anshanin (2026-01-21 01:10:08+00:00): Hi. You accidentally broke Blok 61:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/256980852
(history in the nodes)
BrackoNe (2026-01-21 06:58:31+00:00): Hi! Please could you elaborate how did I broke way/256980852?

My nick is @BrackoNe, but given way is lastly edited by @Shoorick 11 months ago (version 29).

Maybe I did, but please feel free to fix if you know what the issue is, since I do not understand at the first glance for provided way.

Thanks.
anshanin (2026-01-21 10:13:08+00:00): You can see the details here
https://facilmap.org/#q=changeset%20177272071

Some nodes from way/256980852 were moved to completely different locations.

Tram was also broken but it was fixed 2 days ago:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177442864
BrackoNe (2026-01-22 05:47:43+00:00): Thanks for noticing that!
sjevtic (2026-04-01 08:48:54+00:00): building:part should be used for these purposes, parts shouldn't be tagged as separate buildings
BrackoNe (2026-04-01 08:50:54+00:00): Hvala, piše da je WIP, nije dovršeno, iako je prošlo već neko vreme
sjevtic (2026-04-01 22:45:39+00:00): to je u redu, samo nek cela zgrada bude building, a delovi različitih veličina building:part. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:part
BrackoNe (2026-04-06 08:23:39+00:00): Možda nešto propuštam...
@sjevtic, proverio sam sada, jedino zgrada koja je iz tri parta ima: building:part. Nisam pronašao nigde building:part a da je zgrada samostalna?
sjevtic (2026-05-20 13:38:35+00:00): Building:part se koristi kada su različiti delovi zgrade različite visine. Na primer, ovde imaš tri objekta building=apartments sa adresom Jurija Gagarina 188. To bi trebalo da bude jedan building=apartments, a unutar njega building:part sa različitim height tagovima. Nema to veze sa tim da li je zgrada fizički podeljena, building:part se koristi samo za 3D modelovanje. Što se tiče samih delova zgrade, dogovor na forumu je da različite adrese/ulazi budu različiti building objekti, tako da to ostaje.
BrackoNe (2026-05-20 14:07:12+00:00): Tako je, ima i 170 isto i neimenovani delovi kod 178 i 180. Ti partovi trebaju da su u sklopu jednog buildinga, ali nikako da odem da pogledam i završim. Znam dobro kako se obeležava i hvala na podsetniku. :)
TheSwavu (2026-01-15 21:30:13+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for your edit. You have added "Woolloongabba" as an official name of a neighbourhood. Woolloongabba is the suburb that this neighbourhood is located in https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11677744 not the official name of "Gabba Hill"

Thanks.
Langlaeufer (2026-01-16 10:43:25+00:00): Hi, kpp1990 "Änderungen vorgenommen" ist nicht wirklich hilfreich. Was soll ich sonst in einem changeset erwarten. Mein Frage: Im Luftbild sieht man einen Weg/Straße dort wo du die stillgelegte Straßenbahn entfernt hast. Ist das nicht mehr vorhanden?. emergency_access bitte nur verwenden wenn es ein reiner Rettungsweg ist und nicht gleichzeitig reguläre(r) Zufahrt/Zugang (stattdessen emergency=designated)
Fußwege bitte an die Straßen anbinden und nicht am Bordstein enden lassen.
Grüße Langläufer
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177272143
Tomas Straupis (2026-01-15 20:07:38+00:00): Prašytume nekeisti tokių duomenų neturint vietos žinių. Administracinės ribos koreguojamos naudojant oficialius duomenis. Pakeitimą atšaukiau.
MorahT (2026-01-16 17:05:16+00:00): Hi.  You have deleted Public Rights of Ways.

https://www.gloucestershire.gov.uk/prow/rights-of-way-online-map/

Please revert your changeset.
uftyv (2026-01-17 08:28:21+00:00): Hi,

I have reverted the changeset.
kapazao (2026-01-18 15:48:58+00:00): Hola, por favor no cambies etiquetas que desconoces. Has cambiado highway=tertiary a highway=residential haciendo que se pierda la navegación de la población. Revisa la wiki de OSM e infórmate bien acerca del etiquetado antes de cambiarlo.

Un saludo
TrickyFoxy (2026-02-15 09:46:34+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178573796
markalex- (2026-03-12 12:00:57+00:00): Hi rusjanis,
I noticed that you've be splitting this street in smaller segments for the purpose of adding turn restrictions in multiple places.
It seems like while doing so new segments are not included in bike paths (EV10 in this case). I don't know what could cause this, maybe large size of the relation?
Anyway, I re-added all missing segments, so nothing from your side, just an FYI)
marc__marc (2026-01-24 12:58:41+00:00): Bonjour,
il y a un problème car tu as ajouté à des 100aine de km d’écart plein de station de recharge avec la même FRSEOPAB50103A ce qui ne constitue évidement pas une seule station.
J'ai supprimé la ref en espérant que les autres informations soient correctes.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177645091
Cordialement,
Marc
jajanja3 (2026-01-15 20:10:46+00:00): It seems to be Meopham, not New Ash Green. I was way off, as its close to eachother.
Xvtn (2026-02-03 13:52:02+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Thanks for your contribution!
Fizzie-DWG (2026-01-15 22:18:23+00:00): DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177276968
Nakaner-repair (2026-01-15 20:15:47+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 177253864, 177253958, 177253998, 177255131, 177256100, 177256135, 177256555, 177256619, 177256672, 177256708, 177256741, 177256794, 177256855, 177256890, 177256943, 177257039, 177257110, 177257222, 177257289, 177257375, 177257435, 177257469, 177257568, 177257686, 177257698, 177257750, 177257887, 177258270, 177258308, 177258335, 177258358, 177258511, 177258686, 177258882, 177258909, 177259104, 177259380, 177264880.
Fizzie-DWG (2026-01-15 22:18:24+00:00): DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177276968
infeeeee (2026-01-16 11:21:58+00:00): Hi!

Can you link to the discussion about the mass removal of this tag?

Thanks!

Happy mapping!
hmkaiser (2026-01-16 11:58:38+00:00): CEMT defines classes of ship types that operate on European waterways based on various technical characteristics.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:CEMT
On the other hand, the key "ship=yes" is not further specified, but merely expresses that the waterway is used for transport purposes. However, CEMT=VIa already defines this precisely. "ship=yes" only makes sense where a waterway is used by all types of ships, i.e., seagoing and inland vessels.
All European inland waterways exclusively use the key "CEMT=" for classifying shipping traffic.
infeeeee (2026-01-16 12:10:26+00:00): I found it's somewhat documented in the wiki, but it would be useful if it was crosslinked to ship=* and boat=*, so this tag could be more easily found. I see now it's documented only on the CEVNI=* page
infeeeee (2026-01-16 12:17:05+00:00): typo: it's documented only on CEMT=*
lampronessa (2026-01-16 18:16:36+00:00): Correction: Source used was Esri World Imagery.
Tye The Cool Guy (2026-01-17 19:32:52+00:00): Cool
Kenji Follero (2026-04-04 20:01:58+00:00): Thanks
eggie (2026-01-15 22:14:58+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
muralito (2026-01-15 21:21:24+00:00): Hola. No son correctos esos datos. La estacion no tiene nombre. ANCAP es marca asi que va en la etiqueta "brand".  y por supuesto, mucho menos "official_name".
dmjab13 (2026-01-16 14:38:42+00:00): please make these edits in more locally focused changesets, ie one state or city at a time
muralito (2026-01-15 21:27:32+00:00): Is seems you are following iD suggestions blindly. Please don't follow them if you are not sure. The operator:type should be "public" according to the wiki description of the tag.
felipeeugenio (2026-01-16 11:36:37+00:00): Hola. Gracias por sus ediciones. Pero en este polígono hay bastantes más cosas que un farmland. Para un fundo por favor agregar un nodo con place=farm, pero este polígono está incorrecto.

saludos
felipeeugenio (2026-01-16 11:43:56+00:00): HOla. Acabo de reparar básicamente todas las ediciones que hizo. No hay problema con eso y todos quienes comienzan cometen errores, pero por favor fijarse en lo que fue reparado. Preocuparse de no dejar los landuses pegados a los caminos y no usar nombres genéricos.

Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177274959
b-jazz (2026-01-16 19:40:45+00:00): I spot-checked 3 of the 98 objects changed and they all show the same pattern, duplicate a problem object, correct some misspelling, add a strange "@id" tag, leave the old version in place, and destroy history. Fix objects, don't replace them. Thanks.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177313602
Glassman (2026-01-17 21:50:14+00:00): This looks like an import but it doesn't show up on the import catagogue. May need reverting.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177274987
ryantg (2026-01-21 00:47:38+00:00): Glassman, It was already reverted. Please see above. I am trying again.
MassCartog (2026-01-16 02:01:02+00:00): Hi welcome to OSM, could you explain more why you removed these paths? These roads show up on satellite imagery as recently as 2 days ago.
glitch1985 (2026-01-16 02:08:08+00:00): These paths are private industrial property and are constantly changing on a regular basis and have recently had an uptick in tresspassing due to them being displayed on OSM and subsequently alltrails.
MassCartog (2026-01-16 02:22:48+00:00): Thanks for the reply. Sorry to hear about the trespassing. So since these paths exist today, they are valid and should not be removed. But these paths have now been updated with access tags, now apps the use OSM data like alltrails will specify their access. However, It might be some time before these apps to refresh their data.

You have a new account and might not be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground. If it exists on the ground, it is valid data regardless of a feature being public or private, designated or informal/illegal/unauthorized.

The correct way to handle this is to use OSM's tagging system. access=private, or access=no would be appropriate if they are closed to the public. This has now been done.

Please read this for more info:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won't_delete_roads_on_private_property

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F
lampronessa (2026-01-16 18:14:14+00:00): Correction: Source used was Mapbox Satellite.
redd (2026-01-16 08:09:37+00:00): Danke. Habe nun noch die weiteren alten Eigenschaften vom Bau entfernt zur Neuerfassung z.B. mit StreetComplete
NxPFoto (2026-01-16 09:03:47+00:00): das war building=apartments, oder?
Stimmt doch aber schon, oder? durch die Tiefgarageneinfahrt hab ich drauf geschlossen, dass das mindestens 2 Wohnungen sind bzw. Man erkennt ja den Weg zu den 2 Haustüren. Ich hätte gedacht, dass des so passt :)
NxPFoto (2026-01-16 09:14:34+00:00): Ach ne halt, falsch verstanden. Die Eigenschaften stimmen aber immernoch, sieht man auf Mapillary im iD-Editor :) - ich kanns dann (sobald du hierauf wieder geantwortet hast / gelesen hast) hinzufügen
redd (2026-01-16 10:22:40+00:00): Ja. Deine 2 Eingänge passen. 

Aber was vermutlich nicht mehr passte war:
building:levels=2
roof:shape=gabled
source=Bing

Grüße,

Redd
felipeeugenio (2026-01-16 11:37:35+00:00): Hola. Por favor no cambiar categorías de caminos sin consultar a la comunidad. Además arrastró una torre de alta tensión dejándola unida a una vereda.
Fue corregido.
Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177275236
aharvey (2026-01-16 03:02:49+00:00): in case you didn't see, the discussion is at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/is-locality-name-gabba-hill-useful/140437

I think `loc_name=*` is acceptable to indicate that the name is more of a locally used name only, but I agree with removing official_name since that only applies to the suburb.

I'll mention on the thread above.
TheSwavu (2026-01-16 08:40:22+00:00): Err what goes in the name tag then? A place needs a name otherwise what are we mapping?
YomanNH (2026-01-16 10:18:19+00:00): Zapomniałeś w opisie zmian dodać "przesuwanie parkingów rowerowych, żeby nie były zgodne z rzeczywistością". Ale spokojnie, zauważyłem to i wycofałem to, co zniszczyłeś. Ogarnij się, bo ciągłe poprawianie twoich zniszczeń jest męczące. Punkty oznaczające parkingi rowerowe powinny być na ich środku, a nie w losowym miejscu, co ciągle próbujesz zrobić.
olo81 (2026-05-17 09:31:44+00:00): Nie dajemy do punktu z usługami tagów budynku, jeśli już punkt jest na budynku. Otagowałeś budynek w budynku. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1467382841#map=19/50.264717/19.181596

Od razu to zmieniam.
mueschel (2026-01-18 17:58:57+00:00): Hi,
I found several date tags here: 

artwork:creation_year
date
start_date

That's not really common. What is the intended meaning of them?
9_tab (2026-01-19 10:03:12+00:00): For memorials: 
- "date" should be the date of the event it remembers (see inscription), 
- "start_date" when it was installed at the current location (sometimes noted on the plaque),
- "artwork:creation_year" when the artist created the sculpture/work (usually on its sign). 

Initially I used "year" for that last one. A page on the wiki for that is still needed. The one on "date" is messy, but the summary box explains it.

Generally: 
date << artwork:creation_year <= start_date
Kays (2026-01-19 02:16:09+00:00): Did they really leave the trees in the middle of it?
jengelh (2026-01-31 17:57:16+00:00): yes