piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
jake-low (2025-09-08 01:32:42+00:00): I moved the location of this trailhead to the edge of the parking area (just outside the park boundary); it had originally been placed at a fork a ways up the trail, inside the park boundary.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171519313
jake-low (2025-09-08 01:27:11+00:00): As I mentioned in a comment on another of your changesets, disconnecting the trail from the roadway like you've done here will break routing in most applications. I've re-connected the trail to the roadway and placed the trailhead at the correct place, see here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=id&node=889364338#map=20/38.1631656/-109.7625864

Feel free to message me if you have any questions about trail mapping.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171519322
jake-low (2025-09-08 01:20:45+00:00): Thanks for your edits! FYI, when adding a trailhead, it's important to keep the trail connected to the road network (instead of creating a small gap like you've done here). If there's a gap in the network, then people won't be able to get directions from one part to another.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171519328
jake-low (2025-09-08 01:22:49+00:00): I've fixed the problem for this particular edit; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=20/38.1572440/-109.7516994 for an example of how this should be mapped.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171519328
Tómas Ingi (2025-09-09 18:01:20+00:00): Hi gscholz,

The area of the river changes frequently - this shape is very roughly a "normal" size of the river, somewhere between its peak in late spring and its minimum in the autumn / winter. It could perhaps be tagged as intermittent, but I think retagging the area as entirely shingle could be a bit drastic.

Best regards,
Tómas Ingi
gscholz (2025-10-09 17:25:10+00:00): Hi Tómas,
sorry for the late response.
Can you actually prove the complete area is filled with water at a certain time? I understand this is area as a kind of "playground" for the water to cover more or less, but totally filled?

It if is actually filled for - lets say some days - then this area should be tagged as "intermittent" at least.

Guido
Tómas Ingi (2025-10-09 20:51:43+00:00): Hi,

The Bing and Esri imagery shows the rivers essentially completely filling the areas.

The Intermittent tag could well be applicable here. In that case I think one would have to be careful to mark the minimal size separately, since there’s always a decently large shape of water around the center of the river.

-Tómas
Alexey Lukin (2025-09-06 02:00:43+00:00): У вас станция вышла развернутой на 180 градусов. Исправите? Пропорции тоже неверные. Междупутье 24.70 м, ширина платформы 21.80 м.
literan (2025-09-06 09:50:02+00:00): ну хоть не на 90 градусов :)
Felis Pimeja (2025-09-06 11:21:25+00:00): fixed:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171537387
Alexey Lukin (2025-09-07 03:53:34+00:00): Спасибо! По-прежнему требуют исправления междупутье, ширина платформы и зазор между платформой и путем (1.45 м).
Alexey Lukin (2025-09-09 03:53:16+00:00): Исправил междупутье и чуть подвинул платформу.
pwbriggs (2025-09-16 06:47:21+00:00): Looks like you swapped the building and address unit tags on the node and building. I switched those around for you, thanks for the info!

It doesn't look like address coverage is very good in this apartment complex (though it's generally fairly good within Seattle, so I'm not sure what happened here). That unfortunately means the delivery drivers' maps might not be using OpenStreetMap (though they might be combining OSM with another data source...), so I'm not sure this will drastically improve your delivery service.

But thanks for the contribution anyway! Welcome to OpenStreetMap!
StreetSurveyor (2026-04-01 09:48:23+00:00): This section was previously tagged as pedestrian=yes, and that is appropriate. The absence of a sidewalk does not mean pedestrian access is prohibited. There are no posted restrictions or legal prohibitions against foot traffic on this road. Additionally, the presence of a marked bike lane indicates that the roadway is intended to accommodate non-motorized users, which includes pedestrians where permitted.

Please avoid removing pedestrian access tags unless there is clear signage, legal restriction, or authoritative source indicating otherwise.
MechanicalTim (2026-04-01 15:31:31+00:00): Thanks for your comment. After some more research, I now have a better understanding about the legal status (rather than safety) that is the basis of the pedestrian tag.

FYI, the bike path you mention does not actually extend all the way up to Roosevelt Circle, which is the diciest section for a pedestrian. It looks like maybe some of Fellsway West might be mislabeled in that regard. I will look into appropriate labels for that, but understand the pedestrian tag better now. Thanks, and sorry for the mislabeling.
MechanicalTim (2026-04-01 17:57:19+00:00): (And now I realize I am also not 100% sure about the bike lane situation. I was thinking about a different area. I will certainly not make any change unless I revisit.)
jake-low (2025-09-08 00:21:52+00:00): Looks like this is actually the Fayetteville Trailhead; I relabeled it and moved the Kaymoor Miner's TH to the start of that trail (just down the road)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171520106
L'imaginaire (2025-09-06 09:43:49+00:00): Bedankt voor de toevoeging!
jake-low (2025-09-07 23:57:29+00:00): Trailhead edit looks good. FYI you accidentally dragged a node on one of the trails when editing, creating a sharp "spike" in the path (easy to do accidentally in the iD editor). I fixed this for you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171520151
AndyB_66 (2025-09-06 07:06:25+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Dobr%C3%A9_koment%C3%A1%C5%99e_sad_zm%C4%9Bn
John Kastner (2025-09-06 16:20:52+00:00): Hi, what's this node supposed to be? I'm include to delete it.
mmann1123 (2025-09-06 17:36:14+00:00): Sorry my teenager got their hands on my phone I just deleted it
Ewrt1 (2025-09-05 23:44:43+00:00): This is the original changeset, it got reverted for a new one keeping history

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171521106
ratrun (2025-09-06 16:31:44+00:00): Hi,

you have executed a mass import. Where did you discuss this import before?
From where is the data coming from and under which license is this data? Do you have the permission for this import?

I'm going to report this to the data working group. For me this looks as if it needs to be reverted.
ika-chan! (2025-09-06 22:24:56+00:00): Not only that, but your edits deleted road information (e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29313313).
chath_tsu (2025-09-07 01:27:58+00:00): I also sent the user a DM before seeing this discussion. I let them know that their upload is deleting other tags and asked them to stop.
ika-chan! (2025-09-07 03:59:11+00:00): They are still doing it: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/388777934 - at this point it's pure vandalism combined with questionable sources.
Michel Castano (2025-09-08 15:19:08+00:00): Hi,

Thank you very much for letting me know about this issue. I truly appreciate you bringing it to my attention.

I created a small Python script that was intended only to update the speed limits on ways that were missing this information. However, for some reason I don't yet understand, my script seems to have overwritten data from other users, which has unfortunately created a bit of a mess.

I am currently investigating the problem to find a solution as quickly as possible. Your help and understanding in this matter are greatly appreciated.

I have reported this to data@openstreetmap.org so they can help me revert all my changes since September 5th to ensure it is done safely. However, if you have any better suggestions or know of a more effective way to reverse this, I would be very grateful to hear them and your ideas are more than welcome.
Thanks in advance,

Michel
miluethi (2025-09-09 01:15:08+00:00): Your script also affected hundreds of kilometers of highways in Nicaragua. They all disappeared.
Please help to clean up. Thank you!
Michel Castano (2025-09-09 02:01:55+00:00): Update: Data working group from OSM wrote this: I have reverted the edits now. It can take a few minutes for the map to update.
Hopefully everything should be reverted now. Thanks!
NorthCrab_upload (2025-09-06 01:10:53+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/947398442

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
B252697 (2025-09-06 01:11:07+00:00): Apparently the Google Street View for this area is completely outdated as well! Have submitted a report to Google for them to review the Google Street View.
Glassman (2025-09-07 00:28:35+00:00): I probably would have just used colour=red but your may be more exact
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171521976
Udarian (2025-09-06 01:54:15+00:00): based on the imagery https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1427418996 looks more like a bike lane then a footway, is for pedestrians and bicyclists or just bikes?
user_5359 (2025-09-07 10:28:30+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1427419365. What is the mean of the tag casa = gri ?
AngocA (2026-03-22 15:35:13+00:00): Hola cabildo

Veo que estás contribuyendo a los ríos y quebradas en Colombia, eso está muy bien.
Quería decirte que los ríos - waterway, se mapean con el sentido del way aguas abajo, en el mismo sentido en cómo el agua baja de las montañas.

Andres G.
AngocA (2025-10-10 04:00:20+00:00): Hola Cabildos. 
He visto que has estado mapeando ríos y quebradas, eso está muy bien.
Solo te quería contar que waterway representa el flujo del agua, y esta siempre es aguas abajo: conecta con otro río o quebrada o termina en el mar.
Ten presente eso, ya que veo muchas quebradas que has dibujado y terminan en la cima de una montaña, siendo que es lo contrario, nacen en la cima de una montaña.

Gracias.

Andrés G.
❤️‍🔥 (2025-09-07 05:08:18+00:00): Hi, adding layer=1 or -1 is not the correct way to solve the "crossing paths" error. instead, you should join the sidewalks and crossings together. Otherwise the lines are useless for routing/navigation software
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-03-26 08:01:08+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1427156861/history has building = pharmacy that was added in this edit
is it an attempt to map amenity=pharmacy ? How building constructed for pharmacy would be meaningfully distinct from other building=retail ?
habi (2026-07-10 08:18:55+00:00): Ciao cyclingfish
osm.wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours werden in OpenStreetMap mit englischen Abkürzungen erfasst, ich hab' dein 'So' zu 'Su' korrigiert.
Gruss,
habi
habi (2026-07-10 08:19:50+00:00): PS: Hier wegen https://opening-hours.pages.dev/schweiz-suisse-svizzera-svizra/bern-berne
cyclingfish (2026-07-18 07:52:51+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis (und die Korrektur). War mir das nicht bewusst.
Sammyhawkrad (2025-09-06 05:09:06+00:00): Hi Mohammed, 
Places are mapped as nodes at the centre of the city/town/village, and a landuse polygon is added to cover the extent. The name of the place is not added to the landuse polygon. Therefore, the changes you made here will be reverted.

Thanks for your contributions, and keep on mapping. 

Best,
Sam
AndyB_66 (2025-09-06 07:05:24+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
jake-low (2025-09-07 22:54:30+00:00): I think the actual trailhead is at the south end of the parking lot, and not behind the visitor center; I moved the highway=trailhead node there instead
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171524182
jake-low (2025-09-07 22:43:23+00:00): I moved the position of this trailhead to the start of Rich Mountain Trail, rather than at the Ace Gap Trailhead parking area
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171524215
jake-low (2025-09-07 22:38:46+00:00): I fixed a typo (Railraod) in the name, otherwise looks good!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171524248
Off by one (2025-09-26 20:53:21+00:00): I fixed sunset lake not rendering in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172502679 in case you're interested in seeing how I did it.
Sammyhawkrad (2025-09-06 05:28:31+00:00): Hello Mohammed,
name=street is generic and incorrect to use. The name tag is used for known names, but not for the description of what an object is. One example of its correct use is the "highway=tertiary +
name=Chereponi-Wenchiki". If you add name=street to every road you map, then we won't be able to tell one street from the other.

Additionally, use Title Case for correct names, i.e capitalise the first letter of each word in a name except conjunctions (of, and, etc).

Lastly, roads should connect with other roads. Don't place the start or end node of a new road you map close to existing ones, but rather connect it to them with no gap left.

Happy mapping!

Best,
Sam
jake-low (2025-09-07 22:09:36+00:00): This edit looks fine, but FYI I did a bit of follow up mapping here since the situation is slightly complex (two trailheads with separate names, signboards, etc, but sharing one parking area that has its own name).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171524644
jake-low (2025-09-07 21:41:44+00:00): FYI, I tweaked the alignment of the trailhead to move it slightly away from the parking area; having two POIs that are super close together isn't necessarily wrong, but is better to avoid if possible since it can make them hard to edit, and makes it easy to accidentally merge them together in some editors. Looks good apart from that though!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171524786
Gregory Peony (2025-10-30 05:20:15+00:00): Hello, It was unnecessary to map the building as a multipolygon, the outer footprint would have sufficed. I think the dark spot in the middle is caused by a feature on the roof casting a shadow. In some places you mapped solar panels as buildings. Move footpritns to the base of buildings; in this case you shortened a valid highway, becasue you ran out of room to fit all the features which exist at the ground level. Hope this helps. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171524878
DD1GJ (2025-09-09 07:11:11+00:00): gelöschten Stolperstein sicherheitshalber wieder hergestellt
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1774835180/history
Glassman (2025-09-07 00:36:12+00:00): A couple of things. There is an existing pond, but with the name "Stormwater Pond" - Should that be renamed also?

Second, the county parcel information shows this as private land so a park tag doesn't seem right. 

Please review this edit. Let me know if you need any help. 

I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171525579
Im Fokus (2025-09-10 20:44:14+00:00): Sehr aufmerksam, danke.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-09-09 17:38:16+00:00): have you tried to create https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dconvenience ?
greensnail (2025-09-10 05:49:08+00:00): Tak. Już to zrobiłem. Fixed
NeisBot (2025-09-06 06:36:26+00:00): Hi jamierson2k, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Removed convenience store with onchain and lightning payments"

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish #AIgenerated
SafwatHalaby (2025-10-18 12:09:29+00:00): שלום, יש לשים לב שעדכנת את "name" אבל לא את "name:he"

צריך לעדכן את שניהם כאשר משנים את השם.

בנוסף לזה, אולי הגיוני לשים את ואדי עמיק כ-alt_name במקרה הזה (שם חלופי שהוא transliteration מערבית)

ביצעתי את השינויים ב-https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173447247

הנחיות מלאות לגבי שמות כאן: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Israel#Naming
hayashi (2026-02-24 03:52:18+00:00): 「int_name」を削除するのはやめてください。 「int_name」は国際表示名として現地に示されているデータです。 「int_name」は英語とは限りません（このことは osm.wiki/JA:Key:name にも書いてあります)。 ギリシャでは「int_name」に翻字が使われたようですが、日本ではそのようなことは行われていません。ギリシャのローカルルールを日本に適用しないでください。日本でも「int_name」を「name:en」に機械変換したいのならコミュニティの合意を得てください。

また、「name:en」は「name:ja」を英語にしたものを入力してください。略称を入れたり、省略したり、一般名詞をローマ字で表記したりしないでください（このことは osm.wiki/JA:Key:name にも書いてあります)。

「name:en」と「int_name」が一致したとしても「int_name」を削除しないでください。現地表記が「英語」なのか「ローマ字」なのかわからなくなります。

現地に表示されたローマ字表記の「int_name」は、重要な値です。特にOSMでは「name:en」は他の言語（日本語も含む）より重要な基準言語になっていますので osm.wiki/JA:Key:name の規約に従って世界基準を意識した編集が必要になります。「int_name」を単純に「name:en」に置き換えることはできません。（単純置き換えは あなたが示したosm.wiki/JA:Key:name に違約することになります）

まとめますが * 「name:en」は規約に従った値を入力すること * 「int_name」は削除しないこと 上記2点は守ってください
Kovoschiz (2025-09-07 08:55:24+00:00): When they are open to anyone willing to pay and buy tickets, it should be `=yes` + `fee=yes` (or `=customers` if considered to be inside the ticketed and security area)
ERIC JAOUEN (2025-09-07 07:14:40+00:00): Merci beaucoup 
Bonne journée
Cele078 (2025-09-06 10:05:59+00:00): Ciao Thomaso,
mi sembra che hai inserito i tag della relation direttamente sulla way del sentiero degli stambecchi.
Saluti
Thomaso58 (2025-09-06 11:16:17+00:00): Saluti Celo078
Hai ragione. Ero solo confuso. Ero sicuro di averlo inserito. Ma era sulla mia strada invece che sul percorso. Ora è corretto. Cordiali saluti, Thomaso
Comino (2025-09-06 12:43:59+00:00): Hi,

In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes".

Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag !
Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead.

For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Merchants#tagging-guidance
and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bitcoin

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
https://btcmap.org/tagger/6794624
salgo60 (2025-09-26 16:26:38+00:00): AED Arholma exist already https://openaedmap.org/sv/#node/13069095802=undefined&map=19/59.8457252/19.1099422&node_id=13068655901
dreua (2025-10-13 18:17:55+00:00): Eine Notiz hier sagt, dass man die Toiletten nicht löschen möge und auf der Website der Stadt ist hier auch eine öffentliche Toilette vorhanden. Was war der Anlass zur Löschung?
eggie (2025-09-06 07:49:46+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback   Je info heb ik samengevoegd met de al bestaande adresnode.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Fraxi (2025-09-06 08:29:56+00:00): Честит празник!
Трябва да е accessories.
Оправих го:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171530510
Dimitar155 (2025-09-06 08:47:25+00:00): Честит празник и от мен!

Чудех се защо не ми дава линк към уикито, явно това е била причината. Благодаря!
literan (2025-10-19 19:42:25+00:00): кроме этого name, не нашел, что исправлять, выглядит нормально
eggie (2025-09-06 08:34:25+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback Je info is samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-09-06 08:37:45+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Tip..  Die parkeerstroken zijn in OSM geen parkeerterreinen. Je kunt dan toevoegen parking=street_side orientation=perpendicular of diagonal
Het geeft dan ook kleinere P's 


MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-09-06 08:42:24+00:00): Elk begin is moeilijk. 
oneway=no hoeft niet op reguliere wegen. Wanneer je de oneway verwijdert dan ook de uitzonderingen voor tweewielers verwijderen.
rori88 (2025-09-06 09:30:56+00:00): Dank voor de opbouwende kritiek! het is in het begin idd soms zoeken wat de juiste optie is tussen alle mogelijkheden.
eggie (2025-09-06 09:39:43+00:00): In het begin lijkt is het heel onoverzichtelijk wat de mogelijkheden zijn. Dat komt allemaal wel. Ik heb nog wel maxspeed 30 van de voetpaden gehaald. 
Zeker weten dat het voetpaden zijn. 
Dat routeert niet voor fietsers. Vaak zijn die verbindingen wel voor fietsers. 
Dan zou het voetgangersgebied zijn. highway=pedestrian met bicycle=yes

of highway=path... dat routeert ook voor fietsers.
Een footway heeft meestal een G7 bord of is duidelijk bedoeld voor voetgangers.
Gr eggie
rori88 (2025-09-06 12:15:14+00:00): Ik had een en ander afgekeken hoe het bij andere paadjes gedaan was maar wellicht was niet alles waar ik het van afgekeken had correct.
Al doende leert men.
eggie (2025-09-06 12:59:41+00:00): Je zou nog even kunnen checken of je vanuit dr pr Hendrikstraat er met de fiets uit mag aan de zuidzijde. Nu routeert dat niet meer. ..bicycle=yes ?
Mapse..
eggie
rori88 (2025-09-06 13:06:14+00:00): Pr. Hendrikstraat naar Deldensestraat is wel echt alleen voor voetgangers. deze komt ook op de stoep uit en niet de weg. Volgens mij staan er zelfs hekjes om fietsers te weren.
rori88 (2025-09-06 13:09:48+00:00): Wilhelminastraat naar Emmastraat is wel voor fietsers. Deze zijn ook met waaltjes verhard. 
De paden over het plein (park) en bij de speeltuin op de hoek Textielstraat en Nijverheidsstraat zijn grind en niet voor fietsers.
NeisBot (2025-09-06 09:00:40+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
pitscheplatsch (2025-09-14 08:13:13+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/171904528
James pand (2025-09-14 16:24:01+00:00): yes i'll review it
habi (2025-11-04 16:04:16+00:00): Ciao Wikilux
Ich schau grad die Changesets von https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/mrspock550 an.
Dabei fiel mir auf, dass du hier das Einfamilienhaus https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1413823874/history gelöscht hast, das zwei Monate vorher erfasst wurde.
Du hast "dafür" die Addressdaten https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13123054204 am gleichen Ort erfasst.
Kannst du dem mal genauer nachgehen, ich hab' das Gefühl das Gebäude sollte nicht gelöscht werden.
Gruss,
habi