piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
edvac (2024-07-03 11:13:46+00:00): Bonjour,

Vous ajoutez beaucoup d'objets OSM erronés pour une grande partie de la Guinée.

Entre autres, vous méconnaissez la classification des différentes voies publiques et la nécessité qu'elles forment un réseau cohérent. Deux exemples, mais je pourrais en citer des centaines :

Dans cette route isolée, par exemple, vous dites qu'il s'agit d'une rue résidentielle alors qu'il s'agit en fait du début du cours supérieur d'une rivière [1].

Cette autre rue ne semble pas exister, et si c'était le cas, il s'agirait d'une route rurale ou d'un chemin, et non d'une rue résidentielle. [2]

Vous ajoutez également de nombreux polygones d'occupation des sols qui se chevauchent, comme ces deux exemples parmi tant d'autres : [3] [4]

Je vois aussi que vous déplacez les nœuds des lieux (villages, villes...) qui sont au centre hors de votre périmètre, ce qui n'est pas correct. Les nœuds de lieux devraient être au centre de la population correspondante.

Vous prétendez utiliser Maxar comme source, alors que Maxar a retiré son autorisation d'utiliser ses images pour la cartographie dans OSM il y a un an. Avez-vous l'autorisation d'utiliser ces images satellite ?

Vos commentaires ne sont pas conformes aux lignes directrices pour de bons commentaires sur les ensembles de changements. [5]

S'il vous plaît : vous devriez arrêter complètement de cartographier pour le moment, et chercher de l'aide auprès de la communauté guinéenne de cartographie OSM, afin que vous appreniez bien et que vos efforts soient utiles, car la plupart des objets que vous avez téléchargés devront être effacés/corrigiés, ce qui est un travail énorme.

Bien à vous,

Rafael Avila Coya.

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1293036908
[2] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1293061727
[3] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1231779043
[4] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1231779044
[5] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bons_commentaires_de_groupe_de_modifications
Ismaeldiarria (2024-10-27 21:44:42+00:00): Merci beaucoup Rafael, nous allons travailler avec Alhassane pour eviter de produire de pareilles erreurs dans l'avenir.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-08-19 18:33:15+00:00): czyli nie jest potwierdzone by anglicy i niemcy tłumaczyli nazwę tej części Leszna?
Jordi MF (2024-06-17 13:33:23+00:00): Se han revertido todos los changesets de este usuario porque es un usuario bloqueado decenas de veces con cuentas múltiples (https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/usuarios-editando-en-espana-bajo-sospecha-vandalismo-malas-practicas-y-otros/2510/), por lo que sistemáticamente incumple los Términos de Uso de OSM (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenStreetMap_account#Account_Names_and_Multi_Account_Policies y https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Terms_of_Use#VI._Account_cancellation_or_suspension).
El usuario realiza múltiples y pequeñas ediciones para dificultar que sus cambios puedan ser revisados. Los mayores errores son que modifica la toponimia oficial para que no aparezca en valenciano aunque así lo dictamine la Acadèmia Valenciana de la Llengua en la cartografía oficial de la Comunitat Valenciana. Tenemos permiso explícito de esta entidad que, según las leyes autonómicas, es la entidad encargada de la toponimia oficial. Tampoco no tiene en cuenta la cartelería local que aparece en calles, carreteras y sendas.
Por otra parte, este usuario (y todas sus cuentas) está mapeando según las ortofotos y sin tener en cuenta el conocimiento local para delimitar si los elementos se tratan de edificios en ruinas, muros u otros elementos e, incluso, elimina PDIs con todo el historial de forma injustificada.
Ante todo lo expuesto y por las diversas anomalías, revierto todos los changesets porque, de revisar cada uno de ellos, únicamente nos dedicaríamos a ello, como si fuésemos administradores. En caso de revisar todas las ediciones de este usuario que ya ha sido bloqueado por 10 años con otras cuentas, nunca podríamos seguir mejorando la base de datos debido a revisar durante horas cada uno de los conjuntos de cambios y, por lo tanto, dejaríamos de lado seguir mapeando para añadir nueva información.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152803820
fititnt (2024-06-17 13:51:26+00:00): Hello Frans S. (I will write in English, so the language is not become a barrier).

Did HOTOSM (for areas with previous data) provide any dedicated tool to help human validators detect deleted POIs, such as healthcare?

If yes, could you explain to me how to reproduce such checks for content already deleted (which wouldn't trigger typical automated validation, since it already doesn't exist?

Thank you.
Frans S (2024-06-18 07:40:15+00:00): Hello @fititnt, 
About your request, I have no clue how to recover these POI.
My work on this project is validating, (in short) meaning, solving issues, correcting mappings. Squaring buildings etc. 
I never remove POI, or text added to buildings except when they are obvious nonsense, like generic names, hashtags of the mapper etc. 

I advise you to ask this on the specialized forum like
https://community.openstreetmap.org/
Or  Slack channel HOTOSM JOSM  

Best regards
fititnt (2024-06-18 23:55:49+00:00): Oh thank you.

On <https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143333801> (among other questions) I asked if validators get special instructions beyond what is already public when  already exists previous data from local mappers. His reply was similar to yours (not only the buildings themselves, but also fix other obvious issues). I also questioned other less experienced validators on different occasions, but beyond squared buildings/overlapping ways comments, they seem to really emphasize automated checks (maybe overly confident about accuracy/completeness of them).

Please note I'm not complaining specifically about you and have no opinion about the armchair mapper (see previous paragraph). But to keep this sort,  in this case,  the building=yes was created as way/1293057728 while <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/230883851/history#map=19/-29.50606/-51.96521>, added by local mapper, was deleted.

Again, thank you. I will provide feedback focused on the organisers of this kind of activity (when data by previous local mappers already exist). Currently, no one from the active mappers on Rio Grande do Sul (including ones more receptive to this type of activity) seems willing to review collateral damage if armchair review part of the activity cannot solve it. As one (but eye opening) example, in previous wave of editing (all fully validated by the time I complained) the town house of the city intended to help was deleted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141685445#map=17/-29.23705/-51.87336 .
fititnt (2024-06-22 19:59:53+00:00): Hi Frans S. I urgently need to contact whoever inside HOTOSM can do reverts on Estrela/RS (#hotosm-project-16927).

Location data already used by civil defense (informally called "Projeto GPS Rural", however is also backed by law LEI Nº 7.752, de 08 de fevereiro de 2023 of municipality of Estrela/RS and codes such as ES175 have a physical sign that is visible for people to put in front of their houses, and firefighers OSMAnd or similar) was changed without prior contact with the local community nor the editor who uploaded the data. And I'm sorry, but no matter how good the intent of "remote help", breaking routing of things using OSM data already by civil defense is not welcomed, which is why I need contact urgently of whoever inside HOTOSM is able to know how to detect and revert back.

On the forum:

> https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/urgente-necessidade-de-reversao-edicoes-delecoes-sem-discussao-em-dados-do-projeto-gps-rural-em-estrela-rs/114994

The contact points in Portuguese on forum and Telegram are not replying or (even if listed in the Wiki of the project) are saying not be part of organized editing.
Frans S (2024-06-24 08:10:48+00:00): Hello. 
About your question/request.
You are sending this to the wrong person/organization. We, Global validators, jump in to assist at disaster mappings at request.
We solve common issues, check mappings and validate. That's it. 
For Issues as you mention, you have to address them to the local mapping organizations,
I copy this request to 
@BladeTC who might be able to help you. otherwise, he can point you to the correct people.
Best regards
cc @BladeTC
fititnt (2024-06-24 13:38:44+00:00): > For Issues as you mention, you have to address them to the local mapping organizations (...)

Then we have a serious loophole problem: no local organisation claimed to be an organizer from the activities that are known to cause collateral damage to existing data. 

Considering the hashtags claim to be helpful to disaster response, this makes the situation worse for Estela/RS, which undiscussed edits happened on objects that are used by local emergency response.

If inside HOTOSM (either volunteer or paid employees) no capability to identify the damage, then need full revert on Estrela/RS. Last time it was proposed a "post-validation" it took months to be marked as "done".
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-17 12:10:09+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/152800131
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-17 12:11:05+00:00): #vandalism
opendcc (2024-06-17 14:23:26+00:00): Lieber Jonas, Dir ist hoffentlich klar, dass Deine IP da protokolliert wird und damit auch die Rückverfolgung zum realen Namen und Ort möglich ist? Und damit kann eine solche Aktion dann auch mal ganz unangenehm nach hinten losgehen ...

Also: lass es lieber sein.
Frans S (2024-06-18 09:40:03+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Buildings not squared.
Where trees hide a part of a rood, Extrapolate the rooflines. 

Don't include the yard in a mapping.

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152799799
Frans S (2024-06-18 09:40:47+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152799801
DD1GJ (2024-06-18 05:00:12+00:00): Revert, da falsche Geschwindigkeit. Was wolltest Du testen?
Frans S (2024-06-17 14:53:39+00:00): Thanks for mapping,
Please do not cluster buildings !
And, square each rectangular building as well.
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2024-06-18 09:36:44+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Mapped a yard as a building.

Included yard into a mapping .

Buildings not squared



Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152800150
Frans S (2024-06-18 09:19:46+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)

Clustered buildings.
Included yards
Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152800221
VictorIE (2026-02-13 12:35:26+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1293068143/

You had "FIXME=Apparent discontinuity in house numbering" for a few houses here.

The houses facing Weston Road are in the seventy-something range. The houses facing Sweetmount Avenue are in the one-hundred-and-twenty-something range.

I've made changes based on that.
Jordi MF (2024-06-17 13:33:24+00:00): Se han revertido todos los changesets de este usuario porque es un usuario bloqueado decenas de veces con cuentas múltiples (https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/usuarios-editando-en-espana-bajo-sospecha-vandalismo-malas-practicas-y-otros/2510/), por lo que sistemáticamente incumple los Términos de Uso de OSM (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenStreetMap_account#Account_Names_and_Multi_Account_Policies y https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Terms_of_Use#VI._Account_cancellation_or_suspension).
El usuario realiza múltiples y pequeñas ediciones para dificultar que sus cambios puedan ser revisados. Los mayores errores son que modifica la toponimia oficial para que no aparezca en valenciano aunque así lo dictamine la Acadèmia Valenciana de la Llengua en la cartografía oficial de la Comunitat Valenciana. Tenemos permiso explícito de esta entidad que, según las leyes autonómicas, es la entidad encargada de la toponimia oficial. Tampoco no tiene en cuenta la cartelería local que aparece en calles, carreteras y sendas.
Por otra parte, este usuario (y todas sus cuentas) está mapeando según las ortofotos y sin tener en cuenta el conocimiento local para delimitar si los elementos se tratan de edificios en ruinas, muros u otros elementos e, incluso, elimina PDIs con todo el historial de forma injustificada.
Ante todo lo expuesto y por las diversas anomalías, revierto todos los changesets porque, de revisar cada uno de ellos, únicamente nos dedicaríamos a ello, como si fuésemos administradores. En caso de revisar todas las ediciones de este usuario que ya ha sido bloqueado por 10 años con otras cuentas, nunca podríamos seguir mejorando la base de datos debido a revisar durante horas cada uno de los conjuntos de cambios y, por lo tanto, dejaríamos de lado seguir mapeando para añadir nueva información.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152803820
Frans S (2024-06-17 13:52:48+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Inaccurate mapped.
Buildings not squared.
Connected building node to highways and other buildings,

Mapped yard as a building.

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152800341
Frans S (2024-06-18 08:21:55+00:00): Hello. Please do not map outside the task you have selected.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152800421
xtd (2024-06-25 14:33:11+00:00): Caríssimo Pozzer, venho fazer algumas recomendações para mantermos a clareza e os padrões do projeto OpenStreetMap, realizado de forma majoritariamente voluntária no mundo todo.

No OSM, códigos como os que tem adicionado, "SJO999", devem ser marcados com a etiqueta "ref" em vez de "name". Esta deve estar reservada apenas para nomes próprios mesmo.

Também devemos observar quando um ponto de interesse já está mapeado e então editá-lo em vez de criarmos um novo ponto separado para representar a mesma coisa, caso contrário perde-se o histórico de edições e geram-se redundâncias. Se já há uma edificação inclusive mais completamente demarcada com polígono, não faz sentido adicionar um ponto fictício que represente a mesma edificação. O mapa deve refletir a realidade.

Assim, pode corrigir esses dados?

Convém ainda, caso consiga, passar a descrever melhor as alterações ao fechar uma revisão, para outros mapeadores saberem mais facilmente qual é o intuito da edição.

Recomenda-se fortemente a leitura atenta da documentação oficial do projeto em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/

O tópico com diretrizes sobre Nomes, por exemplo, pode ser conferido em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Names#Nome_%C3%A9_apenas_o_nome

A comunidade agradece pelas contribuições e está disponível para ajudar através do fórum https://community.openstreetmap.org/ e ainda de grupo brasileiro no Telegram no qual pode tirar dúvidas mais diretamente com membros experientes: https://t.me/OSMBrasil_Comunidade
Frans S (2024-06-18 09:33:27+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 
Please map more accurate.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152800450
Frans S (2024-06-18 09:35:14+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)

Clustered buildings.
Included yards into a mapping.

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152800462
Frans S (2024-06-18 08:23:25+00:00): Please do not map outside the task you selected.
Why ? There are so many buildings to be mapped.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152800541
Frans S (2024-06-18 08:23:28+00:00): Please do not map outside the task you selected.
Why ? There are so many buildings to be mapped.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152800541
Layft Greater (2024-06-17 13:08:11+00:00): By new boundaries you mean areas with admin_level=6 ?
themi97 (2024-06-17 13:42:03+00:00): Yes. The legislation changed so that new municipalities formed from the merging of the old municipalities and some communities.
Aleksandar Matejevic (2024-07-01 07:00:42+00:00): Just curious, if new municipalities are formed by merging old municipalities and some communities, as stated, should then admin_level=6 relation contain some wider area? This change looks like same area just got upgraded to higher authority level. By my understanding this specific relation is  admin_level=8 and new admin_level=6 relation should be created. What is your opinion on this?
themi97 (2024-07-01 08:13:23+00:00): What do you mean wider area? The boundaries of the new municipalities depend on how many municipalities and communities merged. All new municipalities are relations with afmin_level=6.
Aleksandar Matejevic (2024-07-01 08:20:11+00:00): Like this one https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17728786 

It is admin_level=6 which has area that covers containing admin_level=8 relations. 

Is this intention of your edit or there is no more admin_level=8 relation here?
Layft Greater (2024-07-01 09:01:43+00:00): On the original proposals some admin_level=6 consists of admin_level=8 areas. But some (e.g. Δήμος Στροβόλου) are simply upgraded from lvl8 to lvl6 and have no subareas in it.
Aleksandar Matejevic (2024-07-01 09:04:07+00:00): Thanks, that answers my question, got it.
themi97 (2024-07-01 09:33:10+00:00): Yea Strovolos is the only municipality that didn't merge with another. But the administration level is the same as the new municipalities.
Yea because the subareas of the municipalities are renamed to municipal quarters that are level 8
Frans S (2024-06-18 09:30:30+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Clustered buildings.

Mapped  yards as a building.

Included yards into a mapping.

Rectangular buildings not always squared.

Connected nodes of buildings to other buildings.
Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152800647
Frans S (2024-06-18 09:26:09+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Clustered buildings,
Oversize mapped.
Included yards into a mapping.
Included shadow of the building.

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152800672
silversurfer83 (2024-06-17 20:25:03+00:00): Moin

warum wirfst du da so lieblos zwei Flächen in die Gegend, die praktisch nichts mit der Realität zu tun haben? Das hat so praktisch den gleichen Wert wie gar keine Information.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152800682