piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
totera (2026-02-10 22:49:40+00:00): Con questa modifica avevi cancellato i tag bench=no e shelter=no, ma vedo che oggi li hai ripristinati
kuhni74 (2026-02-27 00:15:22+00:00): hast Du eigentlich die note zum peak gelesen?
kuhni74 (2026-02-27 01:41:45+00:00): im Gipfelbuch steht laut https://www.hikr.org/tour/post71413.html "Selblingshorn"
kuhni74 (2026-02-27 01:44:12+00:00): daher auch summit:register=yes
nono303 (2026-02-27 05:41:18+00:00): Hi @kuhni74
Not fluent in German, prefer English to better understanding.
2. I only specified name from alt_name as natural:peak implies not null name value for rendering
3. BEV is a more reliable source than Hikr
 - 1960 map : Silbhorn named peak at 2940m https://maps.bev.gv.at/#/center/12.9705,47.4556/zoom/14/basis/epo_4/compare/epo_1
 - >= 1980 map : point on Selbhorngrat 2939 https://maps.bev.gv.at/#/center/12.9705,47.4556/zoom/14/basis/epo_5/compare/epo_1 
I let you update @v7 with whatever non null name (p. 2939m, Silbhorn, Selbhorngrat)
kuhni74 (2026-02-27 08:29:18+00:00): Thanks for your kind reply!
The note-tag can be translated: the name "Silbhorn" used in the Franciscean Cadastre certainly stands for the Selbhorn main summit located further south [2655m], because the latter is not marked separately in the Cadastre; the later BEV editions 1:50.000 did delete the term "Silbhorn" for a reason.
kuhni74 (2026-02-27 08:33:19+00:00): The more recent editions of most maps do not have a name for this northernmost summit of the Selbhorn Arete. And the term "Selblingshorn" used in the summit register is hardly ever used publicly, so I tend to use it as loc_name, with still no "name" tag applied. There ARE objects that have no widely known current name, so I see no problem in using "alt_name" and / or "loc_name" without having a name tag. There have been considerable discussions on this issue in the Austrian OSM community forum.
kuhni74 (2026-02-27 08:40:14+00:00): Here is the Franciscean Cadastral Map (dated 1830) of the area: https://maps.arcanum.com/en/map/cadastral/?bbox=1442001.259199787%2C6016645.1351822885%2C1445225.9463305678%2C6017698.532978344&map-list=1&layers=3%2C4 You can shuffle through different maps by using the "more maps" navigation at the top right, but in no other map, Silbhorn is used, whereas Selbhorn (which clearly means the same mountain) is further south. And the Cadastral Map's aim was not to give precise topographic information of the landscape but to identify and describe plots of land that have to pay taxes.
nono303 (2026-02-27 09:12:49+00:00): I’m quite familiar with this issue in the Swiss and French Alps sections where many unnamed peaks are represented on official maps only by their altitude.

My goal is to be able to represent these peaks when rendering them as raster tiles. On many TMS / WMTS OSM basemaps, a peak will not be rendered if it has no name 
For exemple 1373113085 (Nordendspitez southern sub-peak 4570m) which is not represented on OSM based Bergfex & Freemap map
kuhni74 (2026-02-27 09:15:44+00:00): We do not map for the renderer. I am perfectly aware that some OSM data consumers do not render ele-only peaks, but that is no reason for using wrong name-tags.
rarad74 (2026-02-05 18:36:36+00:00): Tu chiar vrei sa fii banat definitiv. NU EXISTA SERVICE ROAD cu subcategoria BUS
Strici tot pe unde umbli. Esti ca un cancer. REVERT!!!
rarad74 (2026-02-05 18:48:32+00:00): Cu aplicatia aia de iphone care nici nu este complet functionala dupa declaratiile producatorului, nu poti edita corect rute de  transport in comun. O aplicatie functionala cum este editorul de la openstreetmap, nici nu te lasa sa salvezi pana nu corectezi  erorile pe care le-ai generat. Prin urmare, ori faci tot posibilul sa editezi de pe un calculator/laptop, ori nu mai edita de pe telfon/tableta Apple.
openstreetmapbuddy (2026-02-06 06:22:30+00:00): Cum pun un drum doar de autobuze atuncu?
rarad74 (2026-02-06 10:04:50+00:00): Tag:highway=busway asta e tag-ul de baza pentru o strada pe care are acces DOAR autobuze sau troleibuze. LA care se poate adauga aditional tag de surface ( asfalt sau ce o fi + nr. lane + limita de viteza). Dar toto ce e legat de o ruta de autobuz trebuie adaugat in relatia acelei linii de autobuz. Relatiile se editeaza doar in JOSM si mai dificil in ID Editor. In niciun caz nu vei putea edita o relatie in Go Map.
rempshaener (2026-02-05 19:19:26+00:00): Hallo,

du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Ich habe zwei Anmerkungen:

1. Das Gebäude besteht aus einem Multpolygon, d. h. aus insgesamt drei Teilen:
Einer Relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/67930
Einer äußeren Umriss https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28078752 und einem inneren Umriss https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30182144

Den Namen hast du am äußeren Umriss erfasst, er gehört aber an die Relation. D. h.: bitte einmal löschen und an https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/67930 packen

2. An der Relation würde ich das building=office gegen building=data_center ersetzen und noch ein telecom=data_center ergänzen.

Bei Fragen bitte melden.
Viele Grüße
NeisBot (2026-02-06 05:59:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13522873599 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Spa"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-15 05:33:11+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178569211
(Cleaned up leftovers from previous edits)
Martinligabue (2026-02-05 18:53:06+00:00): attento che nella modifica hai in un caso solo tolto il nome in inglese, lasciando gli altri, e nell'altro rimosso troppo, anche il civico, che invece è ancora lì anche se il locale ha chiuso
Colbertson (2026-02-05 19:14:23+00:00): leisure=pitch on the whole building isnt right, a node with https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:club%3Dsport  would be better.
Colbertson (2026-02-05 19:18:55+00:00): fixed it up in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178154515
NeisBot (2026-02-06 05:59:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13525094347 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Coffee shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-15 05:33:12+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178569212
(No visible changes after review)
NeisBot (2026-02-06 05:59:49+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13526984128 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Self storage units"
---
Na przykład, bardziej neutralna i obiektywna wersja Twojego tekstu mogłaby brzmieć: "Jednostki magazynowania samochodów" lub po prostu "Magazyny samochodowe", ale jeśli chodzi o przechowywanie rzeczy, to bardziej pasuje "Jednostki samo przechowywania"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-15 05:33:14+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178569213
(Cleaned up leftovers from previous edits)
NeisBot (2026-02-06 05:59:53+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13526988309 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Concierge office"
---
Например, более нейтральная и фактическая версия вашего текста могла бы быть: "Консьерж-офис"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-15 05:33:17+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178569214
(Cleaned up leftovers from previous edits)
eggie (2026-02-05 19:45:10+00:00): Hoi,

Je zou ook evt de afrastering in kunnen tekenen.. barrier=fence

MVG
eggie
molensteen (2026-02-05 21:01:00+00:00): dank voor het idee, ik heb zojuist een hek eromheen getekend
groet molensteen
DeFra85 (2026-02-18 15:42:54+00:00): Ahoi, du hast mit deinem Edit den Wanderweg "Emsweg" leider unterbrochen!!! 
Könntest du das Korrigieren?
AlbertUnruh (2026-02-18 17:23:37+00:00): Genau sowas habe ich befürchtet, deswegen auch "review_requested" (:

Bevor ich Änderungen mache: den Wanderweg über die Bellingwolder Straße (beim Kreisverkehr), also der nächsten Route langlegen?

Ich weiß nämlich nicht, wie "offiziell" der ist und ob die Änderung dann den offiziellen Daten widersprechen würde. Falls er nämlich hoch-offiziell ist, ist der Wanderweg entsprechend auch reell unterbrochen.

*Sobald ich eine Antwort darauf habe, passe ich es natürlich gerne an.*
DeFra85 (2026-02-18 17:35:04+00:00): Ich vermute mal, dass er über den Kreisverkehr läuft.
Aber da müsstest du halt vor Ort nachgucken wie der markiert ist.
AlbertUnruh (2026-02-18 18:20:14+00:00): Mir ist nie aufgefallen, dass er markiert wäre; höchstens das Radnetz. Ich schau bei Gelegenheit aber nochmal nach, wie es aussieht.
Vorerst lasse ich es aber so.

Im Sommer soll die neue Brücke auch fertiger werden, womit die aktuelle Route wahrscheinlich keine 6 Monate mehr gültig sein wird.
eggie (2026-02-05 19:46:40+00:00): Dag molensteen.. 
review_requested 	yes
Lijkt me oke.

MVG
eggie
molensteen (2026-02-05 20:57:49+00:00): dank voor het nakijkien eggie
kwiatek_123 (2026-02-05 19:38:19+00:00): Hej, usunąłeś nazwę "Strefa rozgrzewkowa", jednak w mojej opinii powinna ona zostać, gdyż faktycznie to miejsce jest tak określane przez trenerów - służy do rozgrzewki.
Rogoyski (2026-02-06 16:57:57+00:00): W mojej opinii "Strefa rozgrzewkowa" to nie nazwa, tylko opis. Sam fakt, że  drugie słowo zacząłeś od małej litery, na to wskazuje.

Poza tym sądzę, że strefa rozgrzewkowa nie jest w ogóle boiskiem, t.j. 'leisure=pitch'.
Sylabowy Kot (2026-02-06 18:07:47+00:00): Tyle że w terenie ten obszar jest tak nazwany na wejściu. A ty skasowałeś tę nazwę i nie umieściłeś w opisie, utrudniając identyfikację.
Rogoyski (2026-02-07 08:44:13+00:00): OK, wydawało mi się, że umieściłem ją w description. W takim razie przepraszam, teraz to poprawiłem.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-03-27 18:08:41+00:00): Hello!

You used
surface=pavedy
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/17943206/history

Have you maybe meant
surface=paved
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
Davidshappy64 (2026-03-27 18:46:53+00:00): It was a typo.  I have updated it to paved.  Thanks!
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-03-27 19:41:53+00:00): Thanks for a fix!

And for your mapping!
Hb- (2026-03-22 09:30:03+00:00): Bist Du sicher, dass die Notaufnahme hier node/3690140374 liegt? War das nicht der alte Zustand vor dem Umbau? Das Krankenhaus selbst beschreibt die ZNA-Verlegung auf der Homepage und skizziert: https://www.netzwerk-esn.de/fileadmin/2023/KHM/KHM_Plan_neuerEingang_2023_FK.jpg
Wie aktuell sind die anderen Änderungen?
Hb- (2026-03-22 09:51:01+00:00): Kann es sein, dass dort nur die Rettungswagenzufahrt ist und fußläufige Patiuenten durch den Haupteingang müssen? So sieht das zumindest in diesem Artikel aus: https://www.braunschweiger-zeitung.de/niedersachsen/braunschweig/article408349414/braunschweiger-marienstift-hat-grosse-plaene-fuer-die-notaufnahme.html
bxl-forever (2026-02-07 12:21:52+00:00): Hello,

You created an invalid multipolygon.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20177897

Instead of an MP you should draw a single polygon encompassing the two buildings and put the tags to this one.
eggie (2026-02-05 21:01:10+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Mashin (2026-02-05 20:21:20+00:00): Welcome to OSM!
Just wanted to make sure that the data is used with permission from their owner. OSM has a strict policy on which data can be imported and license compatibility.

Cheers.
Matt M Audubon (2026-02-06 12:34:34+00:00): Thanks Mashin. I work for the Audubon Center so I have the permission to make these updates. We are trying to get our trails properly represented on trail finding apps like AllTrails.
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-07 22:53:42+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.

"Lińsk":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13527196352
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13527196428
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13527196446

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
aceman444 (2026-06-22 16:58:42+00:00): Zdravim, ten LIDL vo februari fungoval? Lebo dnes je cely v rekonstrukcii.
vlakos555 (2026-06-22 17:04:40+00:00): Aj vtedy bol v rekonštrukcii. Ak si dobre pamätám, cdsl som tam aj foto.
vlakos555 (2026-06-22 17:04:52+00:00): Dal
aceman444 (2026-06-22 18:00:27+00:00): No dobre, ale ste ho zakreslili ako funkcny obchod. Opravim teda.
vlakos555 (2026-06-22 18:43:29+00:00): Vďaka
eggie (2026-02-05 21:19:36+00:00): Dag Alice... De format phone aangepast naar +31.. 

MVG
eggie
mueschel (2026-02-13 10:58:20+00:00): Hi,
"orig_name" is not a very common tag - can you specify when this name was in use? E.g. if it was used in the 1800s, you could use a tag like "name:1800 = XYZ"
ks1v (2026-02-15 18:06:09+00:00): Hi, thanks for noticing. I didn't check the wiki but was sure that that tag exist. Seems like aberration of memory. I'll fix it.
ks1v (2026-02-15 18:22:17+00:00): fixed https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178594291
NeisBot (2026-02-06 05:59:59+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/1228024009 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Bed and Breakfast"
---
Bijvoorbeeld, een meer neutrale en feitelijke versie van je tekst kon zijn: "Bed and Breakfast"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-02-15 05:33:17+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/178171916
DaveF (2026-02-06 02:35:10+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6402222390/history

This, & other stations, are correctly tagged.
Sylabowy Kot (2026-02-05 20:21:24+00:00): Dodatkowo GEZ w celu ujęcia zabudowy historycznej.
aTarom (2026-02-05 21:03:19+00:00): Hola, acabo de ver el tag
"street:name"
para un par de aceras
en España las tenemos todas con
"name"
lo pregunto a la comunidad en
https://t.me/OSMes/174073
por si te puedes pasar, creo que con name no hay problema, según lo que mencionen los compañeros hacemos, te parece?
Saludos
José Miguel Picazo Núñez (2026-02-06 07:10:08+00:00): Hola. Ya he entrado y digo allí que lo puse porque está en la wiki. Te pongo también un mensaje. Gracias y un saludo.
marc__marc (2026-04-15 08:38:59+00:00): Bonjour,
si tu modifies le nom des addr:street pour Route de Cortil-Wodon, il serrait logique de faire la même modification sur le nom de la voie
Cordialement,
Marc
Eebie (2026-04-15 15:59:46+00:00): J'ai eu du mal à comprendre la raison de votre remarque. J'ai modifié l'adresse d'un très petit nombre de maisons (3 ou 4) dans cette longue rue à l'aide du  PICC import tool. Finalement, j'ai constaté que le nom de la rue dans OSM ne correspondait pas tout à fait au nom officiel dans PICC. Il était écrit sans trait d'union dans OSM, alors qu'il devrait être « Route de Cortil-Wodon » avec un trait d'union. J'ai donc également corrigé le nom de la rue en ajoutant un trait d'union. On pourrait maintenant faire remarquer que j'ai corrigé le nom de la rue mais pas l'« addr:street » des dizaines de maisons qui s'y trouvent. Ce n'est pas mon intention. Je suis en train d'ajouter et de compléter les châteaux de la province de Namur. Ce faisant, j'inclue également certains bâtiments situés à proximité immédiate de ces châteaux, comme c'est le cas ici autour du Château du Baron. Je n'ai pas l'intention de tout perfectionner à chaque fois dans les villages où se trouvent des châteaux, sinon je n'aurais plus le temps d'ajouter ou de compléter les châteaux.
Cordialement,
Eebie
marc__marc (2026-04-16 04:03:35+00:00): Bonjour,
Merci pour ton retour.
je comprend très bien qu'on ne peux pas modifier tout un village quand on modifie un château.
mon propos était que si tu détectes qu'un nom de rue est erroné mais n'en modifie que la moitié, le contributeur suivant constatant la présence de 2 noms n'a aucun moyen trivial de savoir lequel des 2 est bon, il doit donc refaire le même travail de comparaison de source entre la tienne et celle de l'autre version pour prendre à nouveau la décision de quel source est la bonne et laquelle se trompe.
Je te remercie d'avoir fait cette modification complémentaire suite à mon message https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/265218173/history/9
Cordialement,
Marc
eggie (2026-02-05 21:02:30+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Xvtn (2026-02-17 19:59:37+00:00): Hi, an ALPR node here was deleted a while ago:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174067809
Maybe you can coordinate with that contributor and compare sources for your changes?
Xvtn (2026-02-25 13:38:38+00:00): Were you able to figure anything out?
Pulchritude (2026-07-22 03:46:26+00:00): Is this a confirmed Flock camera? It doesn't look like one I've seen before, it might be owned by that collision tracker startup. Also, I swear I've seen it pointed in different directions
Xvtn (2026-07-22 04:28:13+00:00): Pulchritude, were you able to see it in person? That would be great info if so.
silversurfer83 (2026-02-06 07:29:20+00:00): Moin Jonas :)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1474543133 hier kannst du mal das building=yes und das layer=-1 entfernen. Das dürfte Quatsch sein.

Cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178157580
silversurfer83 (2026-02-08 20:52:30+00:00): hab ich erldigt
mcliquid (2026-02-06 08:22:15+00:00): Hi, ist das in so kurzer Zeit umgezogen, oder gibt es mittlerweile zwei Le petit's in Markdorf?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5066757827

https://www.suedkurier.de/region/bodenseekreis/markdorf/neues-laden-cafe-ein-bisschen-mehr-paris-in-markdorf-13-10-25;art372484,12496635
smo (2026-02-06 16:45:23+00:00): Tja, es sind tatsächlich 2: https://www.suedkurier.de/bodenseekreis/dritter-anlauf-richard-gratwohl-eroeffnet-erneut-die-kneipe-le-petit-in-der-ulrichstrasse-in-markdorf-113380131
bernward1 (2026-04-20 10:09:21+00:00): junction=roundabout aber nicht junction=mini_roundabout.

Ein Minikreisel ist ein einzelner Punkt mit highway=mini_roundabout.
Siehe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dmini_roundabout
Hendrik Helsper (2026-04-21 21:46:04+00:00): Du hast recht. Ich hab die Kreisel in diesem CS korrigiert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181646800
NeisBot (2026-02-06 06:00:03+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13527329242 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Computer store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-02-15 05:33:18+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/178190005
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-07 22:53:47+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13527328109

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Illio (2026-02-14 13:20:19+00:00): Zdravím, nemyslím si, že Horský park (napriek názvu) je leisure=park. Je to skôr les.
Viac tu: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=park
aceman444 (2026-02-22 13:55:32+00:00): No neviem, nie je je to les fungujuci ako park (lesopark)? Mame tam znacenie aj natural=wood, aj leisure park, park pokryty lesom. Ale ak sa odvolavate na to, ze v parku ma byt zelen upravovana ako spominaju na wiki (managed, controlled), tak o tom by sa dalo uvazovat.
Illio (2026-02-22 19:00:16+00:00): Horský park je les, kde sú dokonca bezzásahové časti. Na wiki máte aj príklad s fotkou, kde sa píše: Forest within a city. This is not a park, as greenery is not fully controlled. This is a typical actively managed European forest, as leaves are not removed, trees are not cut into desired shapes, flowers are not planted but rather are growing naturally, etc..
aceman444 (2026-02-22 20:46:40+00:00): Ved to sa pytam, ktoru cast Horsky park nesplna. Nabuduce prosim presnejsi odkaz.
Tak to teda dajme prec.
Illio (2026-02-22 22:36:30+00:00): Je to text pod fotkou, nedá sa na to dať priamy odkaz.
NeisBot (2026-02-06 06:00:04+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13364977157 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Auto repair shop"

#MapWithoutSpam