piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
K1RB1L1TY (2026-03-18 20:02:00+00:00): Well you can change the ways you think sould be changed back to tracks, but i did this for many reasons, however the main one is that On average more roads that i changes are going to fit into the highway=unclassified description, than the previos highway=track description, which is quite specific. While i probably wont be personally going through and changing these myself, feel free to change what you see fit. Just wanted to explain my logic
K1RB1L1TY (2026-03-18 20:03:50+00:00): Sory if the message came of as rude or anything, it didnt mean to be this way, after all but this is just my personally opinoin
HurricaneGator (2026-03-23 21:10:35+00:00): Hello K1RB1L1TY! Thank you for your input. I’ll go ahead and make edits where it seems appropriate. Thank you and happy mapping!
OSM_RogerWilco (2026-02-19 06:18:16+00:00): Moin Dirk D'Agostino,

Bitte verwende aussagekräftige Änderungssatz-Kommentare, um es anderen leichter zu machen zu verstehen, was Du gemacht hast.

Siehe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Bei Namen lassen wir in OSM übrigens die Rechtsform weg (hier: GmbH).

Viele Grüße und happy Mapping!
Roger Wilco
themapper53 (2026-02-19 14:06:56+00:00): Hei, mikä mahtaa olla syynä, että lisäät turhia nimiä karttaan, sillä kyseiset nimet eivät kuulu tänne kartalle?
Tästä syystä poistan turhat nimet ja duplikaatin kyseisestä talosta (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/1787744).

Ethän enää lisäile kyseisiä nimiä kartalle, sillä ne eivät kuulu tänne.

Terv. themapper53
HellMap (2026-02-18 18:41:46+00:00): Hello,

You specified there are no lane markings visible here, but there are on aerial imagery. Can you please clarify if something has changed here?
baltimoore (2026-02-21 09:19:33+00:00): sorry, at the time I had made this observation, the section had been completely snowed over; there *is* actually a lane separator here, though only in this small part of the road.
Fen <3 (2026-03-30 14:34:47+00:00): Hello friend!
rather than putting the operator in the name field, its more appropriate to use the operator=Worcester Housing Authority
as an added bonus, you can also use operator:short=WHA
I have corrected it on the buildings.
thank you for editing, happy mapping!!!
pomodoren (2026-02-18 19:20:48+00:00): Hi!

Adding landuse is great, but this is a bit too big! Are the building part of the landuse?

From the description seems that each block of land needs its own object.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dfarmland
ibanez (2026-02-22 09:38:23+00:00): Which object of the changeset are we discuss here?
pomodoren (2026-02-22 13:23:20+00:00): The main landuse objects:

- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1290633172#map=14/41.63049/19.61380
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1290633170#map=13/41.64088/19.63484
ibanez (2026-02-23 18:05:41+00:00): Hi,
I don't agree with that. 
When modeling huge areas of land, it is common practice to start with the main use and then refine it. Which was the approach of my predecessor (who created the farmland area and 
some residential areas.) When modeling, you always have the conflict of interest: what is "right," how much work does it mean for the mapper, 
and how difficult is it for a renderer to display? 
The alternatives, making small areas did a lot of more work for the mapper and using multipolygons a lot of more work for the renderer. Huge multipolygons cause a slowdown of the rendering process.
AFAIK:
- There is no strict global OSM rule that forbids landuse areas from overlapping.
- There is also no rule that forces you to split farmland into many small pieces just because small residential patches exist inside it.
- Using one large landuse=farmland with many small landuse=residential polygons on top of it is a widely accepted and practical mapping approach. BR Jens
pomodoren (2026-02-24 13:50:06+00:00): I understand to some degree. 

But if then we would follow the logic that it needs more work for the renderer we might as well not put buildings at all, just urban area/rural area, or not put any level of detail. 

I am not so experienced in the topic, seems wrong to me. Practically it is not landuse=farmland because it is landuse=residential - as they are neighborhoods. Otherwise you might as well add landuse=farmland in all of western Albania wherever you see free. 

Anyways, trusting your judgement here - happy mapping :)
eggie (2026-02-18 18:31:52+00:00): Feedback:    Lijkt me oke.
gr eggie
molensteen (2026-02-18 18:39:10+00:00): dank eggie
eggie (2026-02-18 18:42:11+00:00): Het wegdelen op de parkeerplaats kun je nog service=parking_aisle meegeven.
Dan nog wel even die toegangsweg naar de brug afsplitsen.
molensteen (2026-02-18 20:10:19+00:00): zojuist heb ik dat gedaan, goed idee
Sean Trowbridge (2026-02-18 19:58:58+00:00): This Flock ALPR is on the street lamp at 33.02140266949626, -117.10086513055649
pwbriggs (2026-02-19 04:52:32+00:00): Thanks for the contribution! I expanded the direction from NW to Northwest (that's the convention in OpenStreetMap), but otherwise your changes look good.

Thanks again, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! If you have any questions, please feel free to reach out here, via user messages, or on Slack at https://slack.openstreetmap.us/
Sean Trowbridge (2026-02-18 20:00:13+00:00): This Flock ALPR is on the street lamp at 33.01506191101935, -117.10581248568653
Tomas_J (2026-02-19 13:03:12+00:00): Zdravim, dakujeme za doplnenie priechodov. Ak doplnis, klikni po kazdom priechode v Maproulette na tlacitko I fixed it, aby sa uloha oznacila ako splnena. Dik.
NeisBot (2026-02-18 18:36:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/1352809071 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Daycare center"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-02-27 05:33:02+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/178739150
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-16 06:49:56+00:00): Split SEO POI to a node, cleaned up SEO spam tags and fixed addr:city=* to the correct South Hill in changeset 184166481

https://osm.org/changeset/184166481
NeisBot (2026-02-18 18:36:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 9 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/504992593 v4 | 9 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/4873383825 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178738284
itineris (2026-07-05 11:21:03+00:00): When adding a pedestrian crossing, please check there isn't one already, 9 metres away.
Thanks,
Ákos
DD1GJ (2026-02-20 16:57:38+00:00): Revert wg. totalem Chaos, Parkplatz als privat gekennzeichnet.
rarad74 (2026-02-18 18:44:22+00:00): Hi. Please do not change classification inside the town fro primary roads. We - romanian comunity agreed to keep one lvl down for better routing calculation iside the locality.
4TL4S (2026-02-18 22:49:06+00:00): Hi rarad74,

I upgraded this segment to be consistent with the rest of the trunk highway in this area as it was the only primary segment along this route through this town and other nearby towns. If you would like to downgrade highway segments through these towns to align with community agreement I will defer to your edits.
10user22 (2026-02-18 18:52:30+00:00): Mine is proper location. Camera logged just north is wrong
DD1GJ (2026-02-20 16:57:52+00:00): Revert wg. totalem Chaos, Parkplatz als privat gekennzeichnet.
NeisBot (2026-02-18 18:48:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13544622722 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Printing shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-27 05:33:10+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179113569
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
b-jazz (2026-02-19 01:17:09+00:00): I fixed up the tee boxes that were overlapping with the fairways. Please make sure that they don't cross over each other, even if only a centimeter over. Thanks.
NeisBot (2026-02-18 18:54:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13556636235 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Bingo Hall"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-27 05:33:10+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179113570
(No visible changes after review)
Fen <3 (2026-03-30 14:32:19+00:00): Hello friend!
rather than putting the operator in the name field, its more appropriate to use the operator=Worcester Housing Authority
as an added bonus, you can also use operator:short=WHA
I have corrected it on the buildings.
thank you for editing, happy mapping!!!
NeisBot (2026-02-18 18:57:39+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 11 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/18763897 v12 | 4 crossings
https://osm.org/way/636526259 v4 | 3 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/9536775602 v3
https://osm.org/node/193737902 v3
https://osm.org/node/12053291570 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178739053
DD1GJ (2026-02-20 16:58:08+00:00): Revert wg. totalem Chaos, Parkplatz als privat gekennzeichnet.
NeisBot (2026-02-18 18:57:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13574311533 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Flooring warehouse"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-27 05:33:11+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179113571
(No visible changes after review)
muralito (2026-02-18 22:44:21+00:00): This is a big bbox, the modern proof that even Homer nods.
maro21 (2026-02-25 22:12:28+00:00): muralito: How do you know it wasn't intentional?
SimonPoole (2026-02-25 22:26:23+00:00): Because the relevant tags were empty.
SzymonH (2026-02-19 14:54:35+00:00): Zapomniałem jeszcze dodać jednej notatki, ale widzę że dodałeś ten przystanek. Można najwyżej uzupełnić szczegółowo tagowanie: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5173456
felipeeugenio (2026-02-18 20:12:20+00:00): Hola. Está toda esa zona dibujada con ESRI, y usted está moviendo todas las fotos usando fotos BING.

No es grave por ahora, pero por favor no seguir haciéndolo.

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178739425
in2itivity (2026-04-05 02:50:22+00:00): Hi there, this edit is not accurate. While aerial and street-level imagery still shows West 5th Avenue as a bus-only road, this street is now open to all traffic since the opening of the Granville Connector in July 2025. I have corrected these tags and added a "check_date" in an attempt to avoid further confusion!
oscarm_lyft (2026-04-06 19:41:11+00:00): Hi in2itivity,

Thank you for bringing this to	our attention, I apologize for any inconvenience my edits could have caused, and appreciate your edits to correct this. I made these edits based on available street level imagery from April 2025, so thank you for more up to date validation.

Best regards, Oscar Medinilla
NeisBot (2026-02-18 19:12:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13577701506 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Travel agency"
---
Например, более нейтральная и фактическая версия вашего текста могла бы быть: "Туристическое агентство"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-27 05:33:13+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179113572
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
bxl-forever (2026-02-19 15:10:07+00:00): Hello, DavidXander.

Despite the innocent-sounding title of "Added a few Things to a Park", you moved buildings again.

I would like to raise your attention again against redrawing buildings.  Please stop doing that!  We have already spent too much time trying to repair every edit you made over the past days.  In this edit, you moved edges of a buildings which I had just repaired a few hours earlier.

Aerial imagery is not a suitable source to trace buildings in Belgium.  In this country, we use the detailed footprints provided by governments, which show the exact position of buildings.  It is very disappointing that you keep moving good building outlines to follow the distorted imagery.  You may be interested to know that aerial imagery is updated about once a year and that every building seems to "move" with each new set of photos, which obviously is not what they do in reality.  That is why we have consistently been drawing buildings according to the exact footprint over the past decades.  Please do not reintroduce incorrect data.

Thanks in advance.
felipeeugenio (2026-02-18 20:05:18+00:00): Hola. Gracias por sus ediciones. por favor cuidado con realinear todo. Está usando unas imágenes que no sabe si están mejor que las que se usaron para dibujar todo. Es un proceso un poco mas compljo.

Por otro lado, puede cuadrar las estructuras usando la letra Q. Es evidente que una cancha no tiene esa forma.

Saludos y gracias
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178739874
atticquilt (2026-02-23 17:45:35+00:00): Please make sure when editing to review on-the-ground reality. In this case at Garfield and Bayaud, there is a diverter that allows bicycle access but denies vehicular through traffic.
oscarm_lyft (2026-02-23 18:45:57+00:00): Hi, atticquilt! 
My name is Oscar Medinilla and I’m a mapper in the OSM team at Lyft.
You are right, I apologize for any inconvenience caused by my edits. I really appreciate your help by bringing this mistake to our attention. Thank you for correcting my mistake, and I will be more attentive in the future.

Best regards, Oscar Medinilla
atticquilt (2026-02-23 19:01:08+00:00): Thanks, Oscar. Much appreciated.
aighes (2026-02-18 23:21:25+00:00): Hey, is there any reason why you deleted the object and replaced it with node 13577767503 with poor positioning and less information?
Sparks2go (2026-02-19 22:38:37+00:00): My mistake - when I looked at the map the first time  there was no node, then when I looked again there were two. User error. I’ll be more careful going forward.
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-18 21:57:48+00:00): @masoudghorbany
You have reverted the wrong changes again. We should edit according to the rules, not our own wishes. You even made a big change in Change set 178720490 for multiple stores in the same way
Your similar edits in this case are as follows:
178670826, 178671058, 178671110, 178679554, 178673226, 178670009, 178673092, 178673059, 178672997, 178672902, 178672856, 178672902, 178672819, 178668353, 178672325, 178670726, 178670646, 178670548, 178670427, 178670308, 178670112 , 178669930, 178707284, 178721809, 178719611, 178720632, 178720490
, 178713807, 178713572, 178713486, 178713398, 178740197, 178740096, 178740242, 178740283, 178740338, 178740363, 178740492
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-18 21:59:57+00:00): @masoudghorbany
Just 2 hours ago the bug you created in the map was fixed, but now you've messed them up again. Do you have a reason for what you're doing? You even made a big change in Change set 178720490 for multiple stores in the same way
Your similar edits in this case are as follows:
178670826, 178671058, 178671110, 178679554, 178673226, 178670009, 178673092, 178673059, 178672997, 178672902, 178672856, 178672902, 178672819, 178668353, 178672325, 178670726, 178670646, 178670548, 178670427, 178670308, 178670112 , 178669930, 178707284, 178721809, 178719611, 178720632, 178720490
, 178713807, 178713572, 178713486, 178713398, 178740197, 178740096, 178740242, 178740283, 178740338, 178740363, 178740492
Marek-M (2026-02-19 10:39:18+00:00): Proszę zapoznać się z zasadami dodawania nazw i obiektów w OpenStreetMap. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Nazwy

Znaczna większość Twoich edycji nadaje się do wycofania. Tą edycję cofam jako całkowicie niepoprawną.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178765842
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-18 22:01:32+00:00): @masoudghorbany
If you have a reason for your work that is in accordance with OSM rules, write it here. You have made a major change in Change set 178720490 for multiple stores in the same way
Your similar edits in this case are as follows:
178670826, 178671058, 178671110, 178679554, 178673226, 178670009, 178673092, 178673059, 178672997, 178672902, 178672856, 178672902, 178672819, 178668353, 178672325, 178670726, 178670646, 178670548, 178670427, 178670308, 178670112 , 178669930, 178707284, 178721809, 178719611, 178720632, 178720490
, 178713807, 178713572, 178713486, 178713398, 178740197, 178740096, 178740242, 178740283, 178740338, 178740363, 178740492
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-18 22:02:23+00:00): @masoudghorbany
You shouldn't use information from multiple tags in the name tag. You have made a major change in Change set 178720490 for multiple stores in the same way
Your similar edits in this case are as follows:
178670826, 178671058, 178671110, 178679554, 178673226, 178670009, 178673092, 178673059, 178672997, 178672902, 178672856, 178672902, 178672819, 178668353, 178672325, 178670726, 178670646, 178670548, 178670427, 178670308, 178670112 , 178669930, 178707284, 178721809, 178719611, 178720632, 178720490
, 178713807, 178713572, 178713486, 178713398, 178740197, 178740096, 178740242, 178740283, 178740338, 178740363, 178740492
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-18 22:04:54+00:00): @masoudghorbany
You can figure out which method is right with a little study. Education doesn't happen overnight. Know that we must move forward according to a policy to avoid chaos. You have made a major change in Change set 178720490 for multiple stores in the same way
Your similar edits in this case are as follows:
178670826, 178671058, 178671110, 178679554, 178673226, 178670009, 178673092, 178673059, 178672997, 178672902, 178672856, 178672902, 178672819, 178668353, 178672325, 178670726, 178670646, 178670548, 178670427, 178670308, 178670112 , 178669930, 178707284, 178721809, 178719611, 178720632, 178720490
, 178713807, 178713572, 178713486, 178713398, 178740197, 178740096, 178740242, 178740283, 178740338, 178740363, 178740492
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-18 22:07:09+00:00): @masoudghorbany
Don't dwell on your mistake, no one will object to correct entries. You already have a huge number of incorrect edits, adding to them every hour. You have made a major change in Change set 178720490 for multiple stores in the same way
Your similar edits in this case are as follows:
178670826, 178671058, 178671110, 178679554, 178673226, 178670009, 178673092, 178673059, 178672997, 178672902, 178672856, 178672902, 178672819, 178668353, 178672325, 178670726, 178670646, 178670548, 178670427, 178670308, 178670112 , 178669930, 178707284, 178721809, 178719611, 178720632, 178720490
, 178713807, 178713572, 178713486, 178713398, 178740197, 178740096, 178740242, 178740283, 178740338, 178740363, 178740492
Marek-M (2026-02-19 10:35:41+00:00): Proszę zapoznać się z zasadami dodawania nazw i obiektów w OpenStreetMap. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Nazwy

Znaczna większość Twoich edycji nadaje się do wycofania. Tą edycję cofam jako całkowicie niepoprawną.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178765676
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-18 22:09:22+00:00): @masoudghorbany
The edits you made here are not corrections, but this many edits on one wrong entry could be considered obstinacy. You have made a major change in Change set 178720490 for multiple stores in the same way
Your similar edits in this case are as follows:
178670826, 178671058, 178671110, 178679554, 178673226, 178670009, 178673092, 178673059, 178672997, 178672902, 178672856, 178672902, 178672819, 178668353, 178672325, 178670726, 178670646, 178670548, 178670427, 178670308, 178670112 , 178669930, 178707284, 178721809, 178719611, 178720632, 178720490
, 178713807, 178713572, 178713486, 178713398, 178740197, 178740096, 178740242, 178740283, 178740338, 178740363, 178740492
eggie (2026-02-18 20:01:55+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback   Niet name= gebruiken om iets te beschrijven. Dus niet name=Laadpaal name=Parkeergarage.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-02-19 08:48:03+00:00): ..name=Laadpaal heb ik verwijderd.
Mvg
eggie