piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
AurélienQ (2024-01-05 12:29:08+00:00): Bonjour,
Il a été trouvé comme consensus pour la France que les routes marquées highway=trunk sont pour les route dites "pour automobiles" (avec le panneau C107).
Voici le lien de la conversation sur le forum francophone : https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/definition-des-routes-en-highway-trunk/12769/38

Or, il se trouve que le contournement de Cambrai ne correspond pas à ce critère, et n'est en plus ni à 2x2 voies, n'a pas de bretelles d'accès, et a une vitesse maximum relativement basse. Bref, la route doit être classée comme highway=primary.

Bonne journée,
Aurélien
Matt_ (2023-11-18 19:39:44+00:00): Please see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/US_National_Inventory_of_Dams
Piskvor (2023-11-20 16:48:33+00:00): Understandable, thanks.
As it doesn't exist at all, I have retagged as "removed:highway=path" - that way, it doesn't confuse map users (who could think "hmm, bicycle forbidden, accessible on foot?"), but map editors will see the removed way and the note. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144254774
Eino81 (2023-11-21 08:09:10+00:00): Thanks, that is even a better solution. You know, I just mentioned that someone could revive it, because sometimes I saw, that I removed a path, then after a half year maybe, someone put it back, because he "saw that on ortofoto, or on Strava heatmap"... I don't understand these. I mean, I know the heatmap, but I know as well, that can be changed, I saw many paths do not exist anymore, but they are still on heatmap...
Matija Nalis (2023-11-18 20:15:46+00:00): Note: using Rijeka buildings WFS  and #QGIS to prepare data for manual JOSM validation; check as on option for doing semi-manual imports (see also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/osm-meetup-2023-11-09-online/105853/5)
Kerploonk (2023-11-18 20:08:51+00:00): *Álftanes
os-emmer (2024-02-10 13:13:03+00:00): Hallo hse,
du hast hier angegeben, das THW ziehe um. Ich habe dazu das hier gefunden:
https://www.wz.de/nrw/haaner-hilfswerk-zieht-nach-erkrath_aid-100223479

Wie sieht es da mit dem Ortsverband Haan aus? Dieser ist derzeit noch eingetragen:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/170724681

Wo ist das THW derzeit stationiert? Weißt du, wann konkret der Umzug stattfindet?
MxxCon (2023-11-19 01:28:10+00:00): Hello.
When mapping in OSM please don't abbreviate street names. They should be fully spelled out.
You can read more about this at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Abbreviation_(don't_do_it)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144190325
MxxCon (2023-11-19 01:29:05+00:00): Hello.
You added what appears to be an address as building name. Is that intentional?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144190377
NorthCrab_upload (2023-11-18 21:40:27+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1225072172

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
puchaczowsky (2023-11-26 16:55:51+00:00): Nie kopiujemy obiektów z innych miast gdyż mogą się różnić kształtem, adresem itd.
NorthCrab (2023-11-26 18:47:57+00:00): https://img.monicz.dev/-yVHsH8rdx4

Te 2 warstwy w iD są bardzo pomocne w mapowaniu nowo powstałych obiektów :-)
Kenesbay (2023-11-18 22:03:30+00:00): Лежачий полицейский
Kenesbay (2023-11-18 22:02:16+00:00): Лежачий полицейский
Mammi71 (2023-11-23 23:11:51+00:00): hallo welzheimerwald, 
ich möchte Dich nochmals bitten, keine Multipolygone zu produzieren, wo diese nicht nötig sind. Nicht nur dass diese Konstrukte mit teilweise 30 verschiedene outer zunehmend komplex werden, sondern Du machst dabei zunehmend Fehler. In diesem CS z.B. hast Du die Insel im Nägeleswiesensee zwar korrekt als inner des Sees zugeordnet, aber eben auch - unverständlicherweise - als outer des umgebenden Waldes (Relation 7766). Das ist so nicht richtig. Der See ist ein inner vom Wald und die (bewaldete) Insel ein inner vom See. Mehr MP braucht es bei solchen verschachtelten MP nicht, schon gar nicht, dass das inner vom inner zugleich das outer von allem ist (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Multipolygon_Examples).
Ich editiere selbst MPs mit iD, aber da sollte man extrem vorsichtig damit umgehen und sehr genau wissen, was man da tut, da der iD-Editor die MPs nicht optimal unterstützt und sehr schnell was kaputt geht bei editieren.

Danke
NorthCrab_upload (2023-11-18 22:30:27+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1200440924
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1225079301

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
ivanbranco (2023-11-18 23:33:38+00:00): The wiki page you linked does not exist: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cutler_County,_Idaho
hrhino (2023-11-19 00:24:43+00:00): Reverted the Boundary County changeas unsourced and apparently untrue. Please only make changes that reflect reality!

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144193349
ivanbranco (2023-11-19 00:27:16+00:00): They are changing lot of places in France also, they have been blocked once already for the same reason
hrhino (2023-11-19 00:27:50+00:00): Yes, I filed another report. Well noticed!
ElliottPlack (2023-11-22 00:58:29+00:00): DWG is tracking this one Ticket#2023110710000182
AntMadeira (2023-11-19 22:13:13+00:00): Olá, dmbm6.
Tomei a liberdade de reverter os conjuntos de edições em que adicionaste áreas residenciais a povoações inteiras. 
O motivo é fácil de explicar: uma povoação inteira não é uma área residencial. Existem áreas comerciais, escolares, industriais, religiosas, de lazer, agrícolas, etc., portanto, não é correto marcá-las como totalmente residenciais. 
Em aldeias pequenas, onde só existem casas, isto pode não ser muito problemático, mas é um problema em povoados maiores, onde isso é claramente um erro.
Fico ao teu dispor para esclarecimentos adicionais.

Cumprimentos,
António Madeira.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144191811
eggie (2023-11-19 06:57:51+00:00): Hi Gis,

Welcome to OSM in the Netherlands.

This is no parking anymore. Please don't trust aerial imagery. 

Reverted by changeset #144197445

Greetz,
eggie
stillhart (2026-03-02 20:43:20+00:00): 😍 super detailierter supercharger
ablevi202 (2023-11-19 00:49:48+00:00): Reverted, mass change of place names to something made up, replaced existing wiki page with a non-existent one.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144193647
ablevi202 (2023-11-19 02:00:10+00:00): Reverted, mass change of place names to something made up, replaced existing wiki page with a non-existent one.
LySioS (2023-11-19 13:32:36+00:00): Bonjour,
Es-tu sûr de l'adresse ?
Sur un autre article de l'indépendant, ils évoquent 22 av. Maréchal Joffre, soit de l'autre côté du bâtiment.
Tosenbo (2023-11-19 17:43:23+00:00): Bonjour, l'adresse que j'ai mise est également celle mentionée par La France Insoumise sur ses communications (https://actionpopulaire.fr/evenements/2e89839e-c835-4942-8ea9-9ba8a3e3185c/)

Cependant, sur des photos de la rue, j'ai pu voir que le 22 Avenue Maréchal Joffre est également marqué comme "à vendre", peut-être ont ils racheter le batiment entier, qui donnerai à la fois sur Avenue des Eaux Vives et Avenue du Maréchal Joffre ?
LySioS (2023-11-19 19:24:07+00:00): Merci pour la réponse,
Je ne touche à rien
travaudat (2023-11-25 01:20:03+00:00): @kimo Thanks for adding this roundabout. Do you know which junction tag is the correct one to add? (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Droundabout)
kimo (2023-11-25 05:59:49+00:00): Oops. In amongst updating all the bus relations I forgot to tag it as a roundabout. Fixed now.
travaudat (2023-12-02 23:48:30+00:00): Thanks for updating.
SomeoneElse (2023-12-10 13:52:54+00:00): I'm guessing "contruction" should be "construction" here.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-01-07 23:18:30+00:00): Why are these being tagged as access=no?
mcliquid (2023-11-19 10:01:47+00:00): Hi,

just a general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
InsertUser (2023-11-19 13:08:22+00:00): Is this recently named? I don't think there were any named displayed for these trails when I visited.
ablevi202 (2023-11-19 02:00:01+00:00): Reverted, mass change of place names to something made up, replaced existing wiki page with a non-existent one.
Matt_ (2023-11-19 01:29:36+00:00): Please see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/US_National_Inventory_of_Dams
ablevi202 (2023-11-19 01:59:56+00:00): Reverted, mass change of place names to something made up, replaced existing wiki page with a non-existent one.
ablevi202 (2023-11-19 01:59:13+00:00): Reverted, mass change of place names to something made up, replaced existing wiki page with a non-existent one.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144194430
ablevi202 (2023-11-19 02:08:12+00:00): Reverted, mass change of place names to something made up, replaced existing wiki page with a non-existent one.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144194532
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-01 10:52:07+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1225100977/history has access:foot = yes that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
Would using foot access tag (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:foot ) be fitting at least equally well?

Usage statistics are sometimes wrong and should not be blindly followed, but are worth looking at - see http://taghistory.raifer.tech/#***/foot/&***/access%3Afoot/
KiloThree (2024-05-01 12:59:37+00:00): Good points! I'm not sure where I picked up the access:foot pattern from.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-11-19 04:29:20+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15403
Matt_ (2023-11-19 03:25:43+00:00): Please see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/US_National_Inventory_of_Dams
gscholz (2023-11-21 07:20:52+00:00): Hi Khyle,
your recent edits have left behind several errors regarding duplicate nodes:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=120.78664&lat=14.27658&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=144195639

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-28 12:41:23+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/772546484/history has maxweight = 2.041166 that was added in this edit
this value is unexpectedly long and detailed - is it really correct?
pootriarch (2023-11-19 04:53:12+00:00): my notes were only good enough to document these segments. there is a traffic island at the intersection with arroyo pkwy, and the same striping continues east to los robles
Supaplex (2023-11-19 06:50:56+00:00): 這真的是公路休息站嗎？
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11361253570/history
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144196179
frozenrabi (2023-12-08 14:06:04+00:00): This is ridge and there is no path on the top of the mountain. Please do not map haphazardly. Thank you!
Pradip Subedi (2023-12-13 12:39:37+00:00): I am beginning to work 
I apologized for my mistake
neuhausr (2024-02-15 20:43:20+00:00): Do you have a source for this edit? There's no indication of construction in any imagery and the county property map still shows it as zoned as agricultural.
EvanSiroky (2023-11-29 06:26:52+00:00): Hey there! I'm a local mapper from Scotts Valley, CA. I see that you requested a review of this changeset, so I'm giving it a review.

I'm not super familiar with maritime mapping. However, there is an OpenStreetMap wiki page that has some explanation on mooring facilities: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:seamark:type%3Dmooring

After reading the wiki, it seems like post or pile are somewhat interchangeable so this edit seems like it makes sense.

Happy mapping!
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-12-02 11:07:40+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11361300077

is it maybe rather a camping site?
Anzo84 (2023-12-04 16:37:52+00:00): I think this could be a camping or picnic area. Please add tag. There is not water sourse and picnic table.
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2023-12-07 06:18:11+00:00): قرية المجصة تقع شمال هذا المكان وهذا المكان يسمى المجيصة، ونرجوا منكم عدم تعديل هذا المكان مرة أخرى
Vaidotas (2023-11-26 11:03:10+00:00): Kodėl su šiuo pakeitimu aplink vandens telkinius atsirado tiek daug nesujungtų taškų?
DaanLT (2023-11-27 05:23:56+00:00): hmm - pasirodo pluginas bugų turi darant t.t. veiksmus, nė nesimatė atjungti taškai darant pakeitimus, pataisiau - tikiuosi dar kur kitur neprigadino
Vaidotas (2023-11-27 16:40:50+00:00): Per iD redaktorių tokie nesujungti taškai gerokai aiškiau matomi, taip pat ir įspėjimus kampe rodo, dėl neužtagintų ir nesujungtų taškų.
Keletas vietų kur dar pastebėjau tokius nesujungtus taškus šio pakeitimo plote:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/271291196
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1032651837
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/312991464
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/312967869
DaanLT (2023-11-27 18:24:49+00:00): ačiū
DaanLT (2023-11-27 21:51:42+00:00): kiek pamenu, man šitoje vietoje editinant užlūžo josm, paskui jis recoverino pakeitimus ir greičiausiai dėl to taip gavosi
mp747474 (2023-11-19 20:25:41+00:00): Hallo,

ich bewundere deine Fantasie, aber in OSM sollen nur real existierende Objekte eingetragen werden. Frei erfundenene Eisenbahnstrecken gehören nicht dazu. Ich werde deshalb die Strecke wieder löschen.
I-76 (2023-11-20 13:11:09+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM's iD editor!
I'm a little suspicious of where you placed these businesses, as they are right in the road centerline. Did you use anonymous onosm notes that have been untrustworthy for years in Iran? If not, what were your sources?
Thanks,
Theman76
Openmapawsome (2023-11-20 14:06:12+00:00): Hi
The source is my physical attendance over there .
Well it is next to street not in the middle of the street.
I-76 (2023-11-21 13:11:43+00:00): Looks a lot better.
aceman444 (2024-10-05 17:38:14+00:00): Zdravim, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/680970316 preco presun amenity=kindergarten z arealu skolku len na budovu? Okrem toho pridane landuse=education nema velmi zmysel ak je tam len jedna skola.
Senihtu (2025-08-27 12:22:20+00:00): Hi!
Es ist schon ne Weile her aber evtl. kannst Du Dich ja noch erinnern oder kennst die Gegend.

Mit diesem Changeset hast Du das kurze Stück der Karl-Medler-Straße kurz vor der Schillerstraße zur Einbahnstraße gemacht.
Stimmt das? Dann müsste man den Linienweg der Relation 8298521 (Bus 70: Hünfeld => Eiterfeld) ändern.
Oder war es ein Tippfehler?
Weiter frohes Mappen wünscht
Senihtu
WUSCH1463 (2025-08-27 16:11:47+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. Nein, da ist keine kurze EBS. Da war mal eine Verkehrsinsel, die entfernt wurde. Ich korrigiere den Fehler.
Jakka (2023-11-19 10:58:24+00:00): Door het verwijderen van weg segment heb je alle buslijnen onderbroken. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1225156038#map=19/50.95477/5.50996
Jakka (2023-11-19 20:00:21+00:00): Een revert gedaan om beginners edit ongedaan te maken.
Kalepom (2024-03-08 21:19:16+00:00): Bonjour jlgnt,
Qu'as-tu voulu mapper avec ce point ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11361522628
S'il s'agit d'une caméra de surveillance, le schéma de tag ne semble pas conforme aux habitudes https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dsurveillance
Si c'est vraiment une boutique photo, l'emplacement semble incorrect.
:)
jlgnt (2024-03-10 07:03:48+00:00): Bonjour et merci
C'est une camera sur poteau mobile qui semblait provisoire !
ashs_as (2023-11-20 09:47:53+00:00): Hello bachounda ;
I noticed you added the "ref" value "bachounda" to some roads and this value looks like your account name.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/947372679
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/399143180
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/297176172
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/399143175
Can you check and fix it please?
Regards
ashs_as
Thibaultmol (2023-11-29 10:05:36+00:00): Please don't make changesets that are this large, they're hard to check
MuniMadryn (2023-11-21 14:36:20+00:00): No corresponde
b-jazz (2023-11-21 15:26:18+00:00): Thanks for your note. Could you please expand what you mean by this comment? It’s not clear to me which edit you have a problem with and what that problem is exactly. Thanks.
AngocA (2023-11-27 23:10:21+00:00): The denotation of the trees is a SPAM URL pointing to a porn site.
Firefishy (2023-11-27 23:53:13+00:00): Fixed the URL issue.
AngocA (2023-11-28 00:00:29+00:00): Now the question is how many of the contributions from this user are vandalism, injecting porn URLs in OSM features.

He is a heavy mapper in Leipzig - https://hdyc.neis-one.org/?Ingbife, and I hope he can give a valid explanation for this issue.
marczoutendijk (2023-11-28 18:45:45+00:00): I have left a PM to user Ingbife, asking for an axplanation.
marczoutendijk (2023-11-28 19:11:36+00:00): explanation that is.
Firefishy (2023-11-28 23:30:19+00:00): I suspect it was just a mistake and not intentional vandalism. All good now.
Ingbife (2023-12-01 20:26:41+00:00): That was a mishap. I hope everything has been removed or do I still need to correct something?
THANKS
streckenkundler (2024-09-22 19:49:37+00:00): Hei,

ich bin mit JOSM hierauf gestoßen...
Diese Änderung von protect_class sollte noch mal genau geprüft werden. In Brandenburg sind die Biosphärenreservate primär zunächst LSG's, also protect_class=5 das protect_class=98 kommt da hinzu... Ist also beides!

Der brandenburgische Teil der Elbe wird demnächst entsprechend erscheinen...

Grüße,

Sven
limes11 (2024-09-22 20:11:18+00:00): Hi,

danke für den Kommentar. Ich finde jetzt keinen Hinweis darauf, dass dies hier ähnlich gehandhabt wird. Mit Einführung des Biosphärenreservats wurde das LSG "Mecklenburgisches Elbetal" redundant und aufgehoben. 
Generell ist das Biospährengebiet länderübergreifend, sollte eigentlich aus lauter Einzelgebieten bestehen, die dann zum Teil auch LSGs sind. 

Ich habe bislang aber nicht geschaut, ob die fehlenden Teile womöglich bereits erfasst sind.

VG
streckenkundler (2024-09-22 20:45:40+00:00): Hei,

sollten wir das mal im Forum ansprechen?

Also... mein heimischer Spreewald:

Grenze LSG ist gleich Grenze Biosphärenreservat.

Schorfheide-Chorin: ebenso.

Bei beiden gehören Siedlungsbereiche zum LSG (!)

Bei der brandenburgischen Elbtalaue ist es anders... LSG ist gleich Biosphärenreservat, aber (!) LSG mit ausgeschnittenen Siedlungsbereichen ist gleich Biosphärenreservatsgrenze...

Meine Intention ist, daß geschaut werden muß: was steht in der Verordnung... ist zunächst ein LSG ausgewiesen...

Darum auch mein Forenbeitrag: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/suche-schutzgebiete-datennutzungsmoglichkeiten-der-bundeslander/119022
ich kann das für andere Bundeskänder nicht einschätzen, hätte aber eine möglicht gute Basis der Datennutzung.

Danke,

Sven
limes11 (2024-09-22 21:17:16+00:00): Ich vermute, man wird hier die Einzelfälle durchgehen müssen, im Zweifsfall bis in den Wortlaut der Verordnung. Bei den Biosphärenreservaten, die ich mir angeschaut hatte, gab es keinerlei Hinweise auf eine solche eins-zu-eins Beziehung. Häufig finden sich dort Formulierungen, dass Biosphärenreservate LSGs enthalten und zum Teil aus Naturparks hervorgegangen sind.

Der Pfälzerwald beispielsweise ist riesig, ich finden keine Indizien dafür, dass er als LSG ausgewiesen sein könnte. 

Viele Grüße
Hungerburg (2023-11-19 11:44:14+00:00): Hallo Walter, war grad mit whodidit unterwegs. Die Objekte im Gschnitztal mit "A" statt "AT" sind allesamt zweifelhaft. Die Konten mit denen die angelegt worden sind sind beide inzwischen gelöscht. Da hat jemand den Herold kopiert oder so etwas. Meiner Ansicht nach gehören die alle weg.
Walter Schlögl (2023-11-19 11:47:52+00:00): OK, wenn du dir sicher bist, dann lösche sie.
zluuzki (2023-11-19 11:44:54+00:00): forgot sources: Bing Imagery, PHMSA online, FERC eLibrary, HIFLD database
CurlingMan13 (2023-11-19 18:59:28+00:00): When adding bridges, please use the correct tags.  you used:
bridge=yes
highway=road
layer=1

You should have used:
bridge=yes
highway=path
layer=1
golf=cartpath
golf_cart=yes

I have corrected it here, but I know you have made this error in the past.  Please be more cognizant to ensure correct tags are used to prevent error flags.  Thank you.
eggie (2023-11-19 12:21:41+00:00): Dag Bartstreet fence_type=bouwhek lijkt me geen valide tag. Je zou wel bv description=....  kunnen gebruiken.

MVG
eggie
harahu (2023-11-19 23:29:01+00:00): Are you sure `landuse=military` is accurate for the border control? Isn't border control usually the responsibility of police forces?

I don't know the details here. I am just curious.
Stalker61 (2023-11-20 04:57:15+00:00): Hello.
A user who respects himself, first of all, greets the person he is addressing (asks his question).
Issues of protecting the state border, including checkpoints, in the Russian Federation are dealt with by the Federal Border Service. This is an independent structure, which in many matters performs the functions of the armed forces. The police have nothing to do with this.
harahu (2023-11-20 11:52:49+00:00): Ah, I see. Thank you for the reply and clarification. I'd guess `landuse=military` is appropriate then.

Here is a related matter I'm hoping you can help me with: I'm considering adding the `operator` tag to both this checkpoint, as well as the border poles I've mapped along this border (e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10592436107). I'm struggling to decide exactly how to refer to the Federal Border Service in this context. English wikipedia seems to propose a series of options (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Border_Service_of_the_Federal_Security_Service_of_the_Russian_Federation), and I'm unsure which one to pick.

Would you prefer the full official name, or one of the shorter alternatives?
Stalker61 (2023-11-20 14:08:24+00:00): `landuse=military` is the most suitable tag for checkpoints on the Russian state border.

The Border Service of the Federal Security Service of the Russian Federation (PS FSB of Russia) is a structural unit (special service) within the Federal Security Service of the Russian Federation (FSB of Russia), the main task of which is the protection and security of the State Border of the Russian Federation - its land and water borders, and also marine biological resources of the exclusive economic zone of the Russian Federation.
According to paragraphs 6, 7, 8 of Article No. 1[2] of the Federal Law “On Defense” of May 31, 1996 No. 61-FZ, the border authorities of the Border Guard Service of the FSB of Russia are bodies involved in performing certain tasks in the field of state defense in accordance with the Plan application of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, being part of the special service of the federal executive body of the Russian Federation. The border agencies of the Border Guard Service of the FSB of Russia are not part of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, while being in full cooperation with them, they carry out joint tasks for the defense of the Russian Federation.

`official_name =Border Service of the Federal Security Service of the Russian Federation (PS FSB Rossii)`
`short _name=Border Service of Russia`

I am inclined to interpret your question this way.
Stalker61 (2023-11-20 14:16:43+00:00): Sometimes you want to add `military=border_checkpoint` to `landuse=military`