piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2025-06-23 19:24:16+00:00): Maar deze mp relatie is oke.
Kees 59 (2026-05-25 09:09:31+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1408539842 should rawbridge be drawbridge?
0000FF berries (2025-07-01 22:54:35+00:00): Hallo fblaese :)

Thank you for updating OpenStreetMap :)

I'm one of the volunteers, and I'm writing to you because I saw you had added "review_requested" on changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167950730 

The addition of the two barriers is good, thank you :) Also thank you for having a descriptive changeset comment, it helps a lot! :)

Based on my understanding of what you wrote, I would probably not add access=private to the paths https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/505645737 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/773730098 This is because, we don't which parts of the paths are in private land. In other words, we don't know whether there is a fence at https://osm.org/go/xwYL2uu7W?m= (then adding the access restriction would be correct), or whether the private land ends at some other point of the paths, e.g. at https://osm.org/go/xwYL5TGGl?m=). If you do know that there is a fence at https://osm.org/go/xwYL2uu7W?m=, then the whole changeset is fine :)

Feel free to send me a message if you think I can help with anything :)

We also have an OpenStreetMap forum, with sections for Greece, Germany and other countries: https://community.openstreetmap.org/

Thanks again for updating OpenStreetMap and happy mapping :)
joost schouppe (2025-09-05 10:28:49+00:00): In deze changeset heb je de residential area van een hele stadswijk gewist. Ik heb het inmiddels rechtgezet. Zie https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4945830
BCNorwich (2025-06-22 15:57:48+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. 

Replaced a tree to its original position and two area outlines. Corrected spelling of platform.

Regards Bernard.
aharvey (2025-06-23 03:00:17+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Any_tags_you_like suggests that it's okay to start inventing new tags if there's no good existing tag, indeed this is how new tags come about. People start using them and eventually as the usage is refined they get documented as in-use, or they go through a proposal and get documented as approved.

I can't see any glaring issues with `privacy=limited` in this case.

In any case https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:note is used to inform other mappers but in this case https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description would be better as that's for informing map users.

I'll update this to restore the privacy tag but also convert the note to a description.
Jorisbo (2025-06-23 04:08:07+00:00): thx
catonano (2025-06-23 11:44:31+00:00): perchè hai tolto il nome al multicinema ?

Mi pareva fosse corretto
OpenCode (2025-06-23 13:31:30+00:00): Il nome dell'attività commerciale deve stare sul nodo che rappresenta l'attività. L'edificio non deve riportare il nome dell'attività ma solo le informazioni tipiche dell'edificio.
ivanbranco (2025-06-23 13:55:51+00:00): Qualcosa deve essere andato storto allora, perché in questo stesso changeset hai aggiunto all'edificio tag relativi al cinema (es. cinema:3D=yes). Inoltre segnalo che al momento risultano due cinema (2 amenity=cinema).
OpenCode (2025-06-24 09:53:01+00:00): Non ho capito se il tag `cinema:3D=yes` non debba stare nello stesso changeset o dovrei spostarlo sul nodo. Cioè, ho interpretato il tag come "la struttura è dotata di 3D". Ma posso tranquillamente spostarlo sul nodo senza problemi se è sbagliato.
OpenCode (2025-06-24 09:54:27+00:00): La doppia amenity come la si gestisce @ivanbranco?
FilRun (2025-10-15 12:39:38+00:00): Ciao, come mai è stato modificato in strada privata?
hofame (2025-10-15 12:53:18+00:00): A giugno mi sono trovato una transenna in mezzo. Vedi foto: https://photos.app.goo.gl/TEvJm2AuuEcgmmzX8
Stessa cosa salendo da sotto.
Non so se c'è ancora.
eggie (2025-06-22 13:06:59+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
bernward1 (2025-06-22 17:16:49+00:00): Wenn network von Kürzel in Langtext geändert wird, entsteht gerade das Datenproblem.

lt. Wiki ist der bisherige Gebrauch des Kürzels richtig:
Zitat: "Der Schlüssel network=* beschreibt hier den Verkehrsverbund. Ob die Werte Abkürzungen sein sollen oder nicht ist vielleicht noch umstritten, aber die Abkürzung ist gewöhnlich in der Region die übliche Benennung."
Kein Mensch nennt bei uns den VRS mit langem Namen.
Szymson (2025-06-22 13:07:49+00:00): Hej, a czy te uwagi:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4809860
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4809862
są zasadne?
Marek-M (2025-06-22 17:13:27+00:00): Tak, zacząłem aktualizację trasy Z11 od zmiany tagów opisujących te relacje ale zabrakło mi czasu na relatify i poprawki tras. Zaraz będę ten temat ogarniać.
Marek-M (2025-06-22 17:28:54+00:00): Trasa Z11 zaktualizowana.
joost schouppe (2025-07-02 13:14:09+00:00): The main building appears to be a building with several shops inside (reachable from the inside). If that's true, than shop=mall should not have been removed as you did here. It can still remain as a building=retail, because it was probably built to house shops
Константин Гам (2025-06-23 11:39:38+00:00): Пожалуйста, используйте для внесения адресов более правильные решения, в лице приложения EveryDoor !
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2025-06-22 20:39:45+00:00): Merhaba. Oluşturduğunuz notta sadece mağazanın kapandığını söylemişsiniz. Ancak sildiğiniz nesneler arasında bir tane de otobüs durağı var. Otobüs durağını yanlışlıkla mı sildiniz? Yoksa otobüs durağı da kaldırıldı mı?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4817610
김윤형 (2025-06-22 12:33:47+00:00): low level bridge -> low water crossing
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-06-23 01:29:33+00:00): reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167980291
Fizzie-DWG (2025-06-23 02:07:40+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18381
eggie (2025-06-22 13:05:40+00:00): Hi,

Please don't add addresses to building_shapes.
Use the present addressnode.

Greetz,
eggie
Pebox (2025-06-22 21:16:45+00:00): Hi Eggie @eggie,
Thanks for the note. Could you please point me to the exact change where I made it? So I understand and won't do it
eggie (2025-06-22 21:21:17+00:00): https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=167956643
eggie (2025-06-22 21:23:04+00:00): Select the green building shape to see your edits..
Hr eggie
Pebox (2025-06-22 21:31:04+00:00): Double checked - besides 4 node edits and 1 deletion, there are 2 creations for the entrances, as there were no existing nodes at the place of the entrance. Do you mean about them?
eggie (2025-06-23 04:06:46+00:00): Hi....

No...the building itself..  You added addr:housenumber	=520 at the buildingshape and addr:street	Gustav Mahlerlaan at the western buildingshape. 
A fellow mapper removed addresses from the buildingshapes in this changeset
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167956921#map=17/52.337010/4.872982
and
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=167956921

It's okay now.

Perhaps have a look to the phone - format..  That needs +31.... international.

Greetz,
eggie
DwarfNebula_ (2025-06-22 15:09:07+00:00): Hi Nilodo,

Kan je misschien bij de aanpassingen vermelden wat je hebt aangepast? Dan is dit voor anderen ook makkelijk terug te vinden. Alvast bedankt!
bdentremont (2025-06-26 23:33:07+00:00): It's now fixed, but here is an example of where this edit has duplicated an element already on the map.

https://www.osm.org/note/4827069
GA_Kevin (2025-06-27 00:11:05+00:00): Hi thanks for correcting this. It seems the previous node was tagged incorrectly and only had 3 tags, not much to match off. Please see NSI on Tesla Superchargers: https://nsi.guide/index.html?t=brands&k=amenity&v=charging_station&tt=tesla

Thanks again for the quick quality check!
jmarchon (2025-06-28 03:55:42+00:00): I see at least two more duplicates at https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19113682 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1168154376
Is it possible that this is a more widespread issue? Am I missing something?
GA_Kevin (2025-06-28 11:07:47+00:00): I would expext there still go be a few duplicates in ways and relations. This is the tail end of the cleanup curve as a vast, vast majority of stations in the US are nodes. I’ll have to run an adjacent query to find these ways and conflate them to the node that was placed on import. As far as relations, from my memory theres less than a dozen nationwide. I’ll probably just go through and fix those manually.
jmarchon (2025-06-29 02:36:00+00:00): Sounds good. Thanks for doing all the work on importing these!
bdentremont (2025-06-29 02:54:58+00:00): Thanks as well for your good work.  This import and the after consideration to the edge cases have been very well handled.
Hypsometric (2025-07-08 20:39:14+00:00): Merged and deleted another duplicate node (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12944744086) not sure how many more there are in your import. On large changes there is likely going to be some conflicts like this. If you haven't already, be sure to consult the community (https://community.openstreetmap.org/) before large updates like this. Sometimes they will think of some helpful ideas.

Also, all of the nodes I have come across need tags updated to operator=Tesla (instead of Tesla, Inc.).
GA_Kevin (2025-07-08 21:30:39+00:00): Agreed on operator, thanks for merging these! I noticed the `frequency` tag didn't transfer, all DCFC stations such as superchargers are `frequency=0` to distinguish them from AC stations, `frequency=60` in the USA.
Hypsometric (2025-07-18 11:42:14+00:00): I merged another duplicate node to a pre existing way (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17869907). I have stumbled across quite a few of these now.
Hypsometric (2025-08-05 15:18:58+00:00): Hey, GA_Kevin, here is another. I'll let you fix since I don't know much about mapping these. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12944743366
ZeLonewolf (2025-08-08 01:57:47+00:00): The tag brand:wikipedia should not be set. We went through some efforts to remove it as discussed here:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/proposed-bulk-removal-of-brand-wikipedia-tag-from-united-states-pois/107776
GA_Kevin (2025-08-08 02:04:58+00:00): Thanks! I wasnt aware of that, i can remove that tag quite easily! Makes sense to keep it as Wikidata already links to Wilipedia anyway
GA_Kevin (2025-08-08 02:06:03+00:00): Makes sense to remove it since Wikidata already links to Wikipedia. Wow. Sorry about that!
stillhart (2026-03-27 20:22:18+00:00): I am fixing tons of duplicates right now. Please next time look for destination chargers in proximity. it's common issue that people tag superchargers as destination chargers. in the past, iD even suggest a fix that made superchargers to destination chargers. :-( 

otherwise lovely detailed tags :-)
stillhart (2026-03-27 20:23:22+00:00): Btw, there was even a guy who also did an import in some areas around the same time, was even more funny to see.
TheNightRider (2026-03-28 20:18:12+00:00): @stillhart be careful that you delete the new node/way/relation because I've seen a few duplicates where the old one was delete, which loses the history.

Also, please don't rename them "City Name Supercharger" and leave the name as "Tesla Supercharger". The location belongs in the branch, which I've been adding. It's like banks. Chase Bank is Chase Bank at all branches, but each branch is named for the location.
TheNightRider (2026-03-28 20:21:47+00:00): That wasn't clear. Please retain [ name= Tesla Supercharger ] and use branch for the location name, like [ branch=San Jose, CA - Lincoln Avenue ]. This is the way Tesla names the stations on their website.
oba510 (2025-06-23 07:34:31+00:00): Hi, Please don't change the crossing=traffic_signals and similar tags to the less-specific crossing=marked tag. Thank you.
bernward1 (2025-06-22 20:22:30+00:00): 

Wenn network von Kürzel in Langtext geändert wird, entsteht gerade das Datenproblem.

lt. Wiki ist der bisherige Gebrauch des Kürzels richtig:
Zitat: "Der Schlüssel network=* beschreibt hier den Verkehrsverbund. Ob die Werte Abkürzungen sein sollen oder nicht ist vielleicht noch umstritten, aber die Abkürzung ist gewöhnlich in der Region die übliche Benennung."
Kein Mensch nennt bei uns den VRS mit langem Namen.
bartgron (2025-06-22 21:36:48+00:00): Witam, proszę o dodawanie właściwych opisów zestawów zmian:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
Rokolell (2025-06-26 15:32:30+00:00): Ich frage mich in dem Zusammenhang, warum nicht gleich die gesamte Strecke als Stadtbahn gekennzeichnet wurde? Denn auch die Tunnelstrecken gehören dazu. :)
Geomaus 123 (2025-06-26 15:47:26+00:00): Hi, 
Das könnte man natürlich so machen. Nur in Deutschland ist man oft wohl recht stolz über die kreuzungsfreien Abschnitte (Ich weiß auch nicht warum). So hat man in Frankfurt, Düsseldorf, Essen, Dortmund , Bochum und sogar den Straßenbahn Tunnel in Gelsenkirchen als U-Bahn eingezeichnet.
Dies & Das: Die Linie U18 ist ja vollstädig kreuzungsfrei. Somit ist sie eine U-Bahn Linie. Da kann ich verstehen, sie auch als U-Bahn zu werten.
VG Geomaus123
Geomaus 123 (2025-06-26 15:51:44+00:00): Um die Frage mal anders zu formulieren: Sollte man eine Kategorie für das Gesamtnetz wählen oder je nach Ausbaustandart des Streckenabschnitt unterschiedliche. Für Beide Prinzipien gibt es (auch int.) viele Beispiele. Fakt ist aber: Alles zur U-Bahn zu machen (wie vor meiner Änderung) ist falsch.
Rokolell (2025-06-26 18:27:17+00:00): Ja, ich bin da deiner Meinung, das ganze Netz ist definitiv keine U-Bahn. Jedoch die U18 eindeutig abzugrenzen ist natürlich nicht so einfach. Man könne es vielleicht ab Bismarckplatz machen, keine Ahnung...

Dann stellt sich nur noch die Frage, ob man die Stationen auch mit Stadtbahn taggen sollte. Siehe:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/633163736
Rokolell (2025-06-26 18:30:55+00:00): Bzw siehe
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:station%3Dlight_rail
Geomaus 123 (2025-06-26 19:59:00+00:00): Um die genauen Ausbaustandarts zu sehen, kann ich Gleisplanweb.de nur empfelen (keine Werbung!). Schau dir doch mal diesen Plan an: https://www.gleisplanweb.eu/show.php?Map=Essen&Index=1&Height=1737&Width=1522&Title=Stadt-%20und%20Stra%C3%9Fenbahn%20Essen
chriz1978 (2025-07-21 18:54:58+00:00): Die Diskussion läuft doch schon, mehr oder weniger aktiv, seit Jahren in zwei Hinweisen und unter https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Essen#U-Bahn/Tram
AnnaCatarina (2025-09-26 15:16:36+00:00): Hallo,
aus unerfindlichen Gründen flammt diese Diskussion immer mal hier, mal dort wieder und wieder auf.
Dabei ist alles technisch und betrieblich klar geregelt. Und die Unterschiede sind auch offensichtlich. Es gibt nur in ganz wenigen Ausnahmen tatsächlichen Diskussionsbedarf.
Essen hat unzweifelhaft ein gemischtes, aber zwangsläufig (s. u.) getrenntes Straßenbahn- und Stadtbahnnetz mit innerstädtischen Unterflurtrassen beider Netze.
Interessanterweise kommt nie jemand auf die Idee, im Untergrund geführte Trams dort als U-Bahn zu kartieren. Das passiert immer nur bei Stadtbahnenstrecken!? Ist und bleibt aber falsch, egal ob in BO, E oder D/DO/DU usw.
Und auch wenn die Verkehrsbetriebe aus Marketinggründen den betreffenden Linien ein U voran stellen, es sind keine U-Bahn-Systeme. Nur mal ein paar Details zur Abgrenzung:
Zuglängen 90-120 m gegen 40-60 m
Kapazität 900-1200 Pers. gegen 250-400 P.
Drehgestellabstände 12-15 m gegen 6-9 m, was unmittelbar zu entsprechenden Mindestkurvenradien und somit zu völlig anderer Trassenführung führt.
Und dann gibt es auch klare Festlegungen bei OSM: ein System soll immer einheitlich kartiert werden. Das wiederum könnte theoretisch auf gemischten Strecken, z. B. den Drei-Schienen-Gleisen in E, zwar diskutiert werden... üblich ist aber das Kartieren als das höherwertige System auf gemeinsam genutzten Trassen. (In dem Zusammenhang ist es m. E. fragwürdig, gemeinsame Bus-Tram-Strecken als Busstrecke zu kartieren, da Bus (mit Ausnahme von BRT-Systemen) das leistungsschwächste der drei Verkehrsmittel ist.) Und ansonsten ist es in Essen leicht, weil Tram 1000 mm und Stadtbahn 1435 mm. ;-)
Gruß.
Anna Catarina
LudovicG (2025-11-29 14:41:35+00:00): Bonjour,
Je m'intéresse aux nodes post_box 12944774114 et 12944773838.
Est-ce l'operator ne serait pas plutôt "La Poste" ?
Et pour le `post_box:type`, j'aurais dit `community` d'après le [wiki](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:post%20box:type?uselang=fr#Valeurs_utilis%C3%A9es_in_France).
Mais je peux me tromper, j'aurais voulu votre avis.
Par ailleurs, si vous avez l'occasion de récupérer le code d'identification (motif A0A0A0)  de ces deux post_box, je vous en serais très reconnaissant :)
Sigo (2025-11-29 20:27:17+00:00): Bonjour LudovicG,
Pour l'opérateur, c'est bien La Poste et non la Banque Postale. Pour le post_box:type, je l'ai changé et mis en community. Je cartographie avec JOSM et ce dernier ne propose pas ce choix.
J'ai corrigé toutes mes erreurs et j'ai rajouté les codes d'identification manquants.
Merci pour vos remarques pertinentes.
LudovicG (2025-12-01 05:50:06+00:00): Bonjour,
Merci pour votre rapide retour et vos actions :)
FajrAl (2025-06-29 06:06:11+00:00): Bagaimana mungkin Puncak adalah "town?"
rphyrin (2025-07-28 13:01:13+00:00): "An important urban centre, between a village and a city in size. Towns normally have a good range of shops and facilities which are used by people from nearby villages."

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place=town
FajrAl (2025-07-28 14:14:50+00:00): Maknanya, Town ialah kota kecil sebagai pusat kegiatan wilayah yang biasanya ada di kabupaten. Puncak bukanlah termasuk dalam "kota kecil" melainkan "kawasan", jadi saya koreksi menjadi place=region. Tak ada batasan wilayah untuk tag region.
Tommybara (2025-06-22 14:05:20+00:00): Districts no longer exists, so commune-level is technically level 6 now.
phoenixsaigon1698 (2025-06-23 12:17:25+00:00): Nước người ta cùng nhau mà gọi mà offline để tìm ra giải pháp cho đồng thuận các phía. Nước VN battle war edit.
Tommybara (2025-06-23 17:57:10+00:00): @phoenix Tính ra là đi chửi đổng mà đang tự include mình vô luôn đó =))))) Đã gọi là “war” thì nó đâu thể chỉ từ 1 phía mà thành war được đâu ha.
Tewuzij (2025-06-24 12:27:52+00:00): Guys, guys, keep calm, if these's consensus I will tag all of them with admin_level=6
ilias_ (2025-06-22 13:50:31+00:00): Hi, that's a roundabout, why remove oneway=yes?
Aya Samir (2025-06-23 07:14:30+00:00): Hi ilias_;
Thank you for contacting us.
Regarding the removal of the tag (oneway=yes)
According to the OSM wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction=roundabout#:~:text=oneway%3Dyes%20is%20implied%20and%20redundant.%20In%20specific%20cases%2C%20it%20can%20be%20added%20for%20clarity%20though
(oneway=yes) is implied and redundant. In specific cases, it can be added for clarity.
Best regards,
Aya Samir
ilias_ (2025-06-23 08:17:20+00:00): Does that mean we should remove all "oneway=yes" from roundabouts? If it's not incorrect, I don't see the point in removing it. Maybe not add it anymore to new roundabouts, but *removing* it from existent roundabouts is really pointless. Don't you think?
ilias_ (2025-06-23 08:17:54+00:00): There's a lot more urgent things to do in Morocco than "removing oneway=yes from roundabouts".
Aya Samir (2025-06-23 12:17:17+00:00): Hi Ilias,
Thank you for contacting us.
We agree with you; let me explain.
The user "Jan van Bekkum" initially added the road with the tag oneway=no, which is illogical for a roundabout. I mistakenly modified it to oneway=yes and then removed it.
However, we do not add "oneway=yes" to roundabouts ourselves since it's considered implied and redundant, but if the tag was already present before our edits, we generally do not remove it.
Best regards,
Aya Samir
Negreheb (2025-07-13 08:08:01+00:00): Hey Gumball3000, ich kann verstehen, dass man den Zaun eintragen will mit "access=no" aber das ist eher dafür gedacht, wenn da NIEMAND hin kann oder darf. Ich nehme aber an, dass die Bewohner hier schon aufs Grundstück dürfen :D 
Da gehört der Zaun mit dem Zufahrtsweg gekreuzt und am Kreuzungspunkt dann ein "access=private" gesetzt. Nicht auf den Zaun :)

Soll ich mir das mal anschauen, oder willst du das selbst probieren?
phoenixsaigon1698 (2025-06-23 02:14:21+00:00): Rất cám ơn vì các edit của bạn. Tuy nhiên các way_id ở ngã tư nó serve cho mục đích cấm quay đầu. Bạn vui lòng check https://ahorn.lima-city.de/tr/ để kiểm tra turn restriction ở các nút giao bạn vừa chỉnh sửa xong.
phoenixsaigon1698 (2025-06-23 02:29:01+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_Lane_Visualizer nhớ kiểm tra các way id cuối cùng đừng group hết vào vì có cơ chế chia làn
phoenixsaigon1698 (2025-06-23 02:37:42+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16057071#map=18/10.761886/106.704444
Những way_id nhỏ nó kết thúc ở các nút giao lớn là có ý nghĩa để phục vụ cho giao thông. Bạn đừng cố gắng kéo nó ra dài hết. Nếu cần chỉ dẫn vui lòng liên hệ mình vì bạn là một user mới.
user_5359 (2025-08-03 19:06:34+00:00): Hello! please have a look on http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/29gI. What ist the mean of the tag is_id = fysgro/tep319494 ? Why has the key
ref:gent_gis_id set same value? (see http://www.osm.org/node/12820388384)
Jakka (2025-06-22 16:58:41+00:00): reservoir ?
https://www.mapillary.com/app/user/jygpronse?lat=50.7369982&lng=3.5747318&z=17&pKey=806981621503406&focus=photo&x=0.6838336686834809&y=0.5850295017583284&zoom=0.972972972972973
BarathéonR (2025-06-23 06:15:20+00:00): yes, c'est corrigé
aceman444 (2025-12-08 22:50:53+00:00): Hi, on swing gate https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12944830848 what do you mean with motor_vehicle=designated? It means that the object is especially designated for all motor_vehicles to use (so not a restriction, actually a recommendation to use). Is that what you really meant? Isn't the gate actually restricting motor vehicles to private access?
aceman444 (2025-12-08 23:17:55+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/51874700 adding building=hotel only specifies how the building looks like, or how it is constructed. It does not say it is used as a hotel. For that you need tourism=hotel.

You have totally destroyed the building of Tempo shop in Zlate klasy https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/51874970 . The original building was correct. Do NOT use the Bing imagery, it is outdated and unclear. Use Ortofotomozaika SR and Slovak cadastre map. Then you would see the building was correct.
Also moving the hotel Mager was incorrect.
Fuel station buildings like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/777829068 were also moved wrongly. It seems someone else has already fixed those.

Also do not add fictional addr:* components (like addr:street on the Tempo shop) when the building does not have a streetnumber (only conscription number). We import addresses from official state register and follow its definitions of addresses for all buildings.

The building https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/51875156 can be seen on your Bing imagery, why did you remove it?

I have fixed the problems (https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=175690419 ), but pay more attention next time.

Thank you for the other changes that look good.
SpinOff (2025-06-22 22:09:38+00:00): Na linii jest już tag tunnel=yes, więc według wiki tag covered wydaje się zbędny.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:covered
lmagreault (2025-06-22 16:40:09+00:00): Quelle est la source ?
Passe pour Faubourg des Carmes mais connais pas La Cité, Place Fillaudeau et incertain quant au Quartier de l'Église.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167960529
StC (2025-06-30 09:08:31+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changeset ou l'un des précédents ont créé un trou dans le chemin des Douaniers et dans une boucle locale. Le commentaire du changeset n'aide pas à savoir ce qui s'est passé : erreur ? interruption réelle des chemins sur le terrain ?