piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Markus366 (2023-03-17 21:15:00+00:00): Eigentlich ist alles richtig, wenn die Steine so stehen wie du sie eingetragen hast.
Einzig die Bezeichnung passt besser in den tag description.

Ansonsten viel Spaß beim weiteren mappen is osm!
Miss Soapie (2023-03-17 21:25:08+00:00): Alles klar. Die Steine sind richtig eingetragen. Ich bin hier regelmäßig.
user_12500175 (2023-03-17 20:01:15+00:00): Hallo,
die Adresse war richtigerweise schon am Gebäudeumriss eingetragen, ich habe sie am Eingangsnode gelöscht
Gruß
Danfost
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-03-25 15:46:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134108394 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to vandalism and creating fake objects with nonsense names at random places.
CurlingMan13 (2023-03-16 23:28:30+00:00): Do not delete features that area already mapped correctly - specifically the golf course.

this edit has been reverted in part or whole by:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133768837
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133759388
kapazao (2023-03-16 19:08:57+00:00): Hola compañero, esta no es forma correcta de editar.
Por lo que veo simplemente has cogido las imágenes de Catastro y te has limitado a copiar lo que había sin mirar en absoluto las imágenes por satélite (PNOA mejor) para ajustar estos elementos correctamente en el mapa.
Catastro da información de los elementos y ayuda a mapear edificios y otros, pero en absoluto debe usarse como única referencia sin mirar siquiera lo que hay en el mapa.
En tus ediciones si compruebas imágenes por satélite verás que nada encaja y todo está desajustado de sus áreas reales.
Te pediría por favor que corrigieses esto y espero que lo tengas en cuenta para otra vez.
Un saludo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133759530
tsp15 (2023-03-22 01:14:53+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/542677268 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1154811095
Dlaczego te ścieżki nie są połączone!?
Palolo (2023-03-16 20:00:43+00:00): @Mettos Congratulations and thanks for your first contribution to OSM. Please use the online materials to learn how to properly map buildings in OSM. Buildings should have square corners, use the q key to align them. Thanks
Nakaner-repair (2023-03-17 22:59:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133806967 where the changeset comment is:
Palolo (2023-03-16 19:46:07+00:00): @Anoucksdp Congratulations and thanks for your first contribution to OSM. Please use the online materials to learn how to properly map buildings in OSM. Buildings should have square corners (use the q key to align them) and buildings should not overlap. Thanks
OSM_RogerWilco (2023-03-17 08:10:05+00:00): Moin Radler59,

bitte erfasse nur echte Eigennamen als Name (name=*). "Wasserturm" ist eine Bezeichnung und kein Name.

Siehe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen#name_ist_nur_der_Name

Änderst Du das bitte?

Viele Grüße
Roger Wilco
OSM_RogerWilco (2023-03-17 08:15:36+00:00): Kleiner Nachtrag:

Links zu Bilder bei Wikimedia Commons am besten im Format image=File:xyz.jpg eintragen.

Siehe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:image

Ansonsten gibt es es auch den Tag wikimedia_commons. Den verwende ich gerne um Kategorien bei Wikimedia Commons zu verknüpfen. Einzelne Bilder sind aber auch möglich.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:wikimedia_commons
jqngarcia (2023-03-20 08:50:47+00:00): He corregit la teva edició, no tot l'edifici es bar.

Salut, JQN
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-04-28 12:31:03+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3664052 ?
NorthCrab_upload (2023-03-16 18:30:23+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o miejscowości. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, zastosuj kombinację addr:city + addr:street. Jeśli nie, przekaż nazwę miejscowości w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10739791580
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10739791599
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/864706212

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2023-03-16 18:30:23+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10739791526
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10739791527
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10739791530
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10739791531
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10739791533

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Frans S (2023-03-19 11:22:43+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.

You are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.

We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

In iDeditor, zoom in so far that the hidden objects are visible.(blue note on bottom line warns about hidden objects)
Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. Just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.

Tag buildings as building=yes. Nothing more, no names.

Please map each building accurate over the rooflines and squared(rectangular only).


Don't connect nodes to other buildings or features.

The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 

Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.

See also this document:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/11PsAW0bzUZHbS8YnbaFzqOYhJY7tSPYG/view?usp=share_link


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133761356
mueschel (2023-03-29 09:47:00+00:00): Hi,
you added ~15 ways with a "  whatever = remove" tag. Could you check & fix that?
CENTSOARER (2023-04-25 03:19:19+00:00): I think you already fixed them. Sorry I wasn't around to do it myself. Just, thank you.
mavl (2023-03-24 10:30:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 134051515, 134045911, 134058112 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible source - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6981].
user_5359 (2023-03-23 21:36:13+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10739872993. What is the mean of the tags
HodNum = 2
id = 11
? Which type of object did you describe?
Hesham Eltamlawy (2023-03-25 15:18:40+00:00): thank you for attention ! 
I will edit the data with the <type>.
and "hodnum" describes the basin number. 
prepared for update...!
mueschel (2023-03-29 17:25:35+00:00): In some places there are four nodes on top of each other, none of them with valid tags. Please read the OSM Import Guidelines before trying to import any data from an external source:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
Hesham Eltamlawy (2023-03-30 14:56:55+00:00): @mueschel, you right, I will read the conditions before any update.
thank you for support.
kapazao (2023-03-16 19:13:15+00:00): Please try to adjust elements to PNOA imagery. There are a lot of swimming pools that collides with other elements and you should use square forms when it is possible. There are tools for that. 
Regards.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133761805
Markus366 (2023-03-17 19:45:03+00:00): Hallo,

wenn du großflächig Daten aus den nodes von Gemeinden entfernst wäre es günstig, wenn du das auch in den Changesets entsprechend angibst. Dort ist nur der Hinweis auf die Ergänzung von Wiki Daten aufgeführt.

Gruß Markus
Frans S (2023-03-18 10:40:45+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.

You are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.

We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

In iDeditor, zoom in so far the hidden objects are visible. ( blue note on bottom line warns about hidden objects)
Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. Just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.

Tag buildings as building=yes. Nothing more, no names.

Please map each building accurate over the rooflines and squared(rectangular only).


Don't connect nodes to other buildings or features.

The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 

Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.

See also this document:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/11PsAW0bzUZHbS8YnbaFzqOYhJY7tSPYG/view?usp=share_link


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133762043
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-01-28 11:55:52+00:00): Hello!

You used
leisure=parke
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10739883631

Have you maybe meant
leisure=park
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-01-28 11:56:56+00:00): And in case you wanted to map park - then https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/884500207 maps it already, right?
mavl (2023-03-24 10:30:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 134051515, 134045911, 134058112 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible source - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6981].
MxxCon (2023-03-17 00:38:31+00:00): Why remove this area?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133762140
MapSpot (2023-03-17 05:20:08+00:00): Glad you ask! This large polygon was added by an amateur (now inactive) mapper many years ago and is riddled with verification issues and syntactical inconsistencies with the rest of the surrounding area. I've done my best to work around this feature over the years, but it's become clear that there's no real utility left to this feature.

The area was originally drawn to denote the location of the neighborhood of Tottenville, but all other New York neighborhoods since follow a system of simply using a node to mark the general center of a neighborhood, as there often is a slight grey area as to where each neighborhood officially cuts off.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133762140
MapSpot (2023-03-17 05:20:26+00:00): Tagging the entire neighborhood (minus certain parks and shopping centers on the periphery) as a residential area is also highly misleading, as there are many additional non-residential areas within this polygon, including schools, parks, and the large commercial district along Amboy Road. Adding multi polygon holes in this residential area for these dozens of exceptions would then imply that these non-residential areas aren't in "Tottenville".

Overall, it's better to have no data than this highly generalized and inaccurate data, especially when preexisting neighborhood nodes, building types, and POI nodes do a much better job at indicating where Tottenville is and which parts of it are residential.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133762140
MxxCon (2023-03-17 05:30:13+00:00): Wouldn't it be better to change this polygon from residential landuse to just neighborhood polygon?
Also neighborhoods in NYC are mapped as polygons.. maybe not all of them, but not because of stylistics choice but because people didn't get around to mapping them out.
MapSpot (2023-03-18 23:05:12+00:00): That'd be nice to do sometime for here as a type=boundary, but it wouldn't be as simple as a tag swap. Over 80% of this area's ways would need to be redrawn to include the non-residential parts of the neighborhood on the periphery that are omitted
Ideally such a boundary aught to be drawn as a relation bounded by the island coastline, Nassau Place, Bethel Ave, and Page Ave. That may be my homework project, breaking this big egg to make an omelette.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133762140
CurlingMan13 (2023-03-16 23:37:31+00:00): DO NOT MAP FOR THE RENDER!

Changeset reverted in:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133769039
cyton (2023-03-16 20:53:19+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM, Leute die mit StreetComplete rumgehen sind immer gern gesehen.
Bei fragen gern Kontakt zur Berliner Community aufnehmen; https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Berlin#Kontakt_zur_Community
Oder zu spezifischen Dingen eine Note mit Streetcomplete und Bildern öffnen.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133762309
eggie (2023-03-16 20:46:45+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
pitch in pitch geeft een foutmelding. 
feedback  Die pitch op de node met naam van de scouting heb ik verwijderd. Van de grote pitch (sportveld) heb ik recreation_ground gemaakt.
De Scouting staat al op het clubgebouw. 


MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
kogutowicz-mano (2023-03-17 05:06:57+00:00): Visszavonatnám, ha tudnám kivel.
bkil (2023-03-17 14:56:15+00:00): Mindkettő metrósat vagy csak ezt?
bkil (2023-03-17 15:02:14+00:00): Ezt visszavontam https://osm.org/changeset/133792111#map=15/47.5004/19.1008
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-19 14:26:23+00:00): Co chciałeś osiągnąć przez edycje w https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1084290180/history  ? Bo teraz są tam zmapowe dwie równoległe drogi dla rowerów
Đuro Jiří (2023-03-17 05:36:08+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1132143170#map=17/36.02315/-5.61406&layers=N

este edificio fue demolido
Đuro Jiří (2023-03-17 05:37:50+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1128304353#map=18/36.02568/-5.60821&layers=N

esto también
Đuro Jiří (2023-03-17 05:40:32+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1132143145#map=18/36.02218/-5.61551&layers=N


esto también,finales de enero pasado, había obras en curso, incluso la mitad del muro fue demolido
Đuro Jiří (2023-03-17 05:46:22+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/556438882 

no existe, según lo que vi allí, nunca existió
Frans S (2023-03-21 18:15:52+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.

You are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.

We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

In iDeditor, zoom in so far that the hidden objects are visible.(blue note on bottom line warns about hidden objects)
Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. Just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.

Tag buildings as building=yes. Nothing more, no names.

Please map each building accurate over the rooflines and squared(rectangular only).


Don't connect nodes to other buildings or features.

The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 

Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.

See also this document:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/11PsAW0bzUZHbS8YnbaFzqOYhJY7tSPYG/view?usp=share_link


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133763710
eggie (2023-03-16 20:53:38+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

feedback Elk begin is moeilijk, maar je hebt het pad gewoon opgepakt en geplakt op een andere weg. Dat werkt niet.
Eigenlijk moeten eerst de wandelroutes worden omgelegd. Dat kan overigens niet met editor iD. 
Lopen de officiele wandelroutes werkelijk zo?

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-03-16 20:59:36+00:00): Je opgeplakte pad verwijderd en route omgelegd. 
Groet
eggie
mopzeela (2023-03-16 21:01:48+00:00): Hi Eggy, ja recent is over de aangepaste route nog een wandeltocht gegaan. De boomsingel hoort bij mijn huis en daar zit een bewoonde dassenburcht onder. Dus kunnen er geen wandelaars en mountainbikers langs. Ook is de boomsingel aan beide kanten afgesloten met een hek. Bedankt voor 't omleggen :-)
eggie (2023-03-16 21:11:36+00:00): Oke... Ja die dassen moeten hun rust hebben.
Je hebt wel kans dat een medemapper het pad weer op de kaart zet.
Meestal zetten we dan zo'n pad op access=private  Het routeert dan niet. 
Beter is misschien wel het dan om zo'n pad aan te passen naar disused:highway=path met een note=  afgesloten ivm dassenburcht. 
Dat rendert dan niet op de kaart, (wandelaars zien het pad niet op hun kaart en/of mobiel/ gps scherm) maar zorgt er wel voor dat het niet meer wordt ingetekend.

Ik kan het wel als zodanig aanpassen.
eggie
mopzeela (2023-03-16 21:20:24+00:00): Hi Eggie,

Ja, dat zou heel fijn zijn want met die dassen zijn we heel blij, die (en ander wild dat daar van de rust geniet) willen we graag beschermen :-)
eggie (2023-03-16 21:30:08+00:00): Oke...zal het aanpassen...  Dan komt er een onzichtbare lege lijn. disused:highway=path

.. met note met algemene uitleg..  Beter niet de D.......n noemen.
eggie (2023-03-16 21:36:55+00:00): note=Geblokkeerd ivm rustgebied voor dieren
(De note is voor medemappers)
disused:highway=path 
Even ctrl-f5 als je nog het originele pad ziet. (cache leegmaken)
Succes met de d.......n.
AntMadeira (2023-03-17 17:10:09+00:00): Ora viva.
Como vejo que mapeias muitos fornos de cal antigos ( e bem) aproveito para informar que existe uma etiqueta para isso:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dkiln

Abraço,
António.
Hufkratzer (2023-03-17 23:01:19+00:00): Hi,
Isn't that a riding arena? Riding arenas should be tagged leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian, see
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:leisure=horse_riding
PistouTw (2023-03-18 17:50:42+00:00): Thanks, i changed to Pour une carrière, utiliser les étiquettes pour terrain de sport (pitch) et sport équestre (equestrian sport). Modifier ou traduire cette description.
Frans S (2023-03-21 18:24:55+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
buildings not accurate mapped.
Not squared.
Included more buildings in 1 mapping.
Included the shadow into a mapping



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133764465
kubahahaha (2023-03-16 20:39:06+00:00): Są plany co ma tu powstać, nie wiem też czy brownfield pasował do trwającej rozbiórki - no i nie było tu wcześniej przemysłu.

https://investmap.pl/w-krakowie-trwa-rozbiorka-galerii-plaza-strabag-wybuduje-w-tym-miejscu-wielki-kompleks-wielofunkcyjny-filmy-zdjecia.a303394
krana (2025-10-05 18:32:57+00:00): Thank you!
literan (2023-10-15 11:39:01+00:00): а здесь вот пишут, что все же Южный квартал...
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3940853
map per (2023-03-20 18:20:51+00:00): Wegen "Meine Änderungen überprüfen": Sieht gut aus, danke!

Der Zaun im Osten (1) geht, dem Luftbild nach zu Urteilen, nicht über die Straße, hab den Zaun deshalb etwas gekürzt.

Viele Grüße
map per

(1) https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/414574582
jxpsert (2023-03-16 20:56:08+00:00): Dit kan waarschijnlijk met minder ways. Als dat zo is, hoor ik graag feedback hoe ik dat beter kan doen.
eggie (2023-03-17 06:56:14+00:00): Het motto in osm is ..Map what's on the ground.... dus het kan prima zo als die paden er in werkelijk ook zijn.

Groet..eggie
Berlin53 (2025-09-29 14:07:25+00:00): Das Indoormapping verwirrt mehr, als das es Klarheit bringt. Ein Hinweis darauf existiert auch schon.
Exe19 (2023-03-17 09:41:41+00:00): Dodało Ci się ograniczenie prędkości do Granicy Parafii
Mariusz Dykierek (2023-03-17 17:37:51+00:00): Dzięki. Skorygowałem
MxxCon (2023-03-17 00:50:15+00:00): Hello.
Please note that it's unnecessary to name this feature as "Atheleric track" since this is what tags are for. Please see this article for more detailed explanation https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions

Also please note that this feature was already mapped last month in https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5318175
We shouldn't map the same feature twice since that goes against https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element guideline.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133765664
SekeRob (2023-03-31 10:06:34+00:00): Hi crumou

Seen you do this couple of times: When 1 area like here a scrub zone, shares the outline of a larger area, it has to be mapped as outside without any inner/outer role to in this case the wood. In this case I've split the scrub and wood and made each a simple polygon. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/134331066 for the change

If you need clarification, feel free to ask or revisit the multipolygon wiki which details what's outer and inner, special attention for multiple inside areas that form a single inner zone requiring a separate 'inner' outlines which enclose these.

ciao
eggie (2023-03-18 06:01:23+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
NorthCrab_upload (2023-03-16 21:30:22+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10740083477

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eggie (2025-10-19 14:06:43+00:00): Dag tliet.  Bestaat het adres ook niet meer? Dat heb je ook verwijderd.

MVG
eggie
nlehuby (2023-03-18 17:18:12+00:00): Bonjour,

je ne comprends pas du tout les modifications qui ont été apportées à la relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9190526

Pouvez-vous svp m'expliquer ?

Avant, il s'agissait du trajet de Disney vers l'aéroport. Maintenant les tags from et to indiquent qu'il s'agit du trajet inverse, et le nom n'indique plus rien d'utile.
Or, le trajet inverse existe déjà, c'est la relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9190527. Donc il fallait peut-être modifier celui-là plutôt que la première relation ?
Ce n'est clair, les chemins ajoutés semblent aller dans les deux directions.

Enfin, les tags wikidata et wikipedia ne sont pas valides : il font référence à un réseau de bus et devraient donc être dans des tags network:wikidata et network:wikipedia.

Merci d'avance pour votre aide.

nlehuby
Steube (2023-06-19 11:35:43+00:00): Hallo steffenetz,
Du hast auf dem aus Hammerstedt nach Süden führenden Weg ein access=no gesetzt. Damit ist der Weg für keine Verkehrsart mehr legal nutzbar. Vermutlich ist diese Eintragung nicht korrekt.
Steube
Steube (2023-06-29 08:18:21+00:00): Leider keine Reaktion...
Hab's mir heute angesehen und angepasst. Zulässig ist für motor_vehicle Landwirtschaft und Linienverkehr (=Bus).