piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ChehrehBargi (2023-06-18 10:03:27+00:00): سلام
شما از برچسب highway=turning_circle برای انتهای بن‌بست‌ها استفاده کرده‌اید. این نوع گره برای جاهایی استفاده می‌شود که دایره گردش دارند. توجه شما را به این متن از قوانین ویکی جلب می‌کنم. اگر متن برایتان گویا نبود، تصاویر انتهای صفحه را مشاهده کنید.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dturning_circle
Casey_boy (2023-08-30 16:06:20+00:00): Hi, 
It looks like you created two untagged ways in this changeset:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1179840550 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1179840551
Presumably this was by mistake and these should be deleted?
Casey_boy (2023-09-29 13:21:56+00:00): Removed in: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141912494
lukabułka (2026-07-10 21:12:50+00:00): poprawiłam
emersonveenstra (2023-06-05 21:40:36+00:00): Reverted for vandalism (mass-deletion of features) in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136990372
marczoutendijk (2024-04-01 09:56:19+00:00): Hi Jordan,
For a number of roads south of Como Lake you are using:
surface=25 as tag.
But what is that meaning? Usually we don't use numbers for the surface tag.
Maybe a mistake?
It is between:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/139633489
and:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/82341077

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
Jordan Leick (2024-04-01 16:07:00+00:00): Hi Marc! My intent was to update the maxspeed tag for those roads. Not sure how I managed to assign those values to the surface tag, but I have now fixed the issue for all of those ways. I then used Overpass to check that I hadn't done this in other places. Thanks for calling doing the quality check, and bringing it to my attention!
-Jordan
marczoutendijk (2024-04-01 16:12:26+00:00): Thanks for fixing so quickly!
moje_konto (2023-06-05 23:19:32+00:00): Coś nie wyszło z tym płotem, przechodzi przez chodnik i jest połączony z latarnią.
moje_konto (2023-06-06 01:22:36+00:00): www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136993358

Odłączyłem płot od latarni, a z tyłu połączyłem z węzłem terenu, środkowy był pominięty.

Gdy coś się źle złączy w trakcie edytowania, to należy użyć opcji "Cofnij" i poprawić zanim się zmianę wyśle.
emersonveenstra (2023-06-05 21:40:26+00:00): Reverted for vandalism (mass-deletion of features) in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136990372
Akkurator (2023-06-29 22:48:29+00:00): Hallo GCWMR,

zur Info, hier hat jemandem dein sidewalk in der Schlierer Straße nicht gefallen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137728673

Grüße,
Akkurator
webfil (2023-08-15 13:07:53+00:00): Greetings. Can you provide a source for this edit? Les Placements is not listed in GeoNames nor official listings (CGNDB, Banque de noms de lieux du Québec), so the provenance of the population figure is not obvious. On the other hand, Gaspé-Ouest is indeed listed in these databases; why the deletion?
CanGeoReader (2023-08-15 23:12:46+00:00): Bonjour, 
Je n'ai pas de source officielle, cependant je vis dans ce quartier (Les Placements) depuis douze ans. J'aurais, probablement du mentionner cela, désolé. 
Pour la population, c'est une estimation approximative basée sur la densité de bâtiment dans la subdivision de recensentement. Le tout réalisé par moi-même en ma qualité de source autoritaire sur le sujet ;). Si ce n'est pas une bonne référence, je peux supprimer, mais jai crus comprendre du wiki qu'une  approximation, si approximativement juste, était acceptable.
Quant à Gaspé-Ouest, je n'ai jamais entendu ce toponyme prononcé par des gens de Gaspe (Gasponiens). L'appellation est archaïque. Suite à ton commentaire, j'ai relus le wiki pour Key:old_name et je vois, que j'aurais du simplement changer name: Gaspé-Ouest à old_name: Gaspé-Ouest, plutôt que supprimer la localité.
webfil (2023-08-16 15:23:31+00:00): Bonjour. Pour la source de la population, c'est possible d'ajouter une valeur 'source:population=local knowledge' à l'élément.

Concernant Gaspé-Ouest, le toponyme, même si peu usité, est répertorié dans différentes bases de données, dont la CGNDB, à la source des données CanVec. En effet, sa suppression est peu souhaitable; c'est possible d'ajouter une note ('note=') pour indiquer sa désuétude. Je l'ai fait à Saint-Majorique/Fontenelle sur l'élément 1564853486 [https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1564853486].
CanGeoReader (2023-08-16 18:13:26+00:00): Comme tu as proposé, j'ai rajouté local knowledge comme source pour la population. 
J'ai aussi rétablis Gaspé-ouest avec les mêmes tags qu'avant que je la supprime, sauf pour name:Gaspé-Ouest que j'ai changé en old_name:Gaspé-Ouest. 
Est-ce correct ?
Voici le changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139976852
KDJ7 (2023-06-05 21:26:17+00:00): the street is not one way road
NorthCrab_upload (2023-06-05 21:10:28+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Krasickiego":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/427853745
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/427854023

"Miarki":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/427853913
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/427853926

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Endres Pelka (2023-06-06 20:20:11+00:00): Poprawione w 137030486
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-06-05 21:26:13+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 136981462, 136981465, 136981476, 136981603.
user_5359 (2023-06-06 05:22:33+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Danke für die Änderung: Nur ist der access Wert kein Standardwert und wird deswegen von den meisten Routern vermutlich ignoriert. Außerdem würde ich ein Eintrag (z.B. note) empfehlen mit dem voraussichtlichen Ende der Maßnahme. 
Eine Anpassung werde ich wegen der fehlenden Informationslage nicht vornehmen.
flohoff (2024-01-03 17:13:28+00:00): Ich bin hier auch gerade drüber gestolpert weil ich mit OSRM profilen probiert habe und "disabled" halt kaputt ist.

Ich entferne das jetzt mal.

Flo
m@rio (2023-07-30 16:58:12+00:00): Cześć KapPeBro,
zmodyfikowałeś parametry ul. Nasturcjowej w Bolechówku, ale aktualne zdjęcia tego terenu nie wskazują na istnienie tej drogi, raczej na sosnowy zagajnik.
Niemniej, nawet jeśli coś tam powstało czy powstanie, to z pewnością nie jako 'secondary'. 
Możesz wskazać źródło Twojej edycji?

pzdr
m@rio
m@rio (2023-08-13 12:53:33+00:00): Brak odzewu - wycofuję zmiany.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-06-05 21:40:17+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1179852077

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
olo81 (2023-08-28 18:27:23+00:00): Jeśli jest tu oznakowanie dla rowerów to błędnie otagowane. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Rowery
olo81 (2023-08-28 18:27:38+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/881723439
ETOMapper (2023-06-05 21:54:07+00:00): The golf features were incorrect.  The correct features were added back to the map
emersonveenstra (2023-06-05 22:04:53+00:00): Never delete other people's work, modify the existing objects instead. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history for more information. It's considered rude to outright delete an entire golf course and then re-draw it basically the same way, especially since you didn't re-add features like the fairway multipolygons.
marczoutendijk (2023-07-27 18:43:09+00:00): Waarom gebruik je bridge=no?
Als iets niet bestaat of niet aanwezig is hoeft dat ook niet te worden vermeld.
JJJWegdam (2023-08-03 10:14:10+00:00): Dat is waarschijnlijk een foutje van me geweest. De bridge key kan gewoon verwijderd worden. Ik had het aangepast omdat het in de vorige leek alsof er één van de vier sporen op een enorm lange brug lag
marczoutendijk (2023-08-03 13:42:32+00:00): Dank je, aangepast.
1998alexkane (2023-06-06 22:00:45+00:00): It appears that you removed highway on- and offramps?? I'm fairly certain these still exist...
MrSledge (2024-06-11 15:13:53+00:00): suspicious tag combination - boundary=administrative together with landuse=residential (1)
MxxCon (2023-06-07 03:53:24+00:00): Hello.
In general instead of outright deleting and creating a new features, it's much better to update existing features to their current state. When you delete a feature in OSM its history gets destroyed, which sometimes can be useful to refer to at some point in the future.
Also when editing buildings in NYC, please take care to preserve nycdoitt:bin= tag, where appropriate, since it refers to a unique id of each building in NYC's official building database and makes it easier to look up metadata about those buildings(like constructions date, height, number of floors, etc).
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136991235
silversurfer83 (2023-06-06 06:38:38+00:00): Moin :)
hast du vielleicht mehr Informationen zu der Sperrung? Zum Beispiel:
Dauer (geplantes Ende)
Ist die Straße nur für KFZ oder auch für Fahrrad und Fußgänger nicht nutzbar?
Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136991422
Penyelam (2023-06-06 12:00:10+00:00): Voraussichtliche Dauer bis 31.8.2023.
Auch für Fahrräder gesperrt. Fußgänger könnten durchkommen.
Penyelam (2023-06-07 13:51:39+00:00): Nach Abschluss der Bauarbeiten wird nur noch die gerade Verbindung der Reiherwiese zu Vor dem Dorfe bleiben.
silversurfer83 (2023-06-07 14:15:07+00:00): Danke für die schnelle Rückmeldung
Werde das dann mal passend einarbeiten
silversurfer83 (2023-06-07 15:23:27+00:00): Sorry, dass ich nochmal störe:
es ist also NUR der kurze Abschnitt südlich des Hauses Pfingstanger 16 gesperrt? Und der kurze südliche Abschnitt Pfingstanger (zw. Reiherwiese und Vor dem Dorfe) fällt dann weg?

Grüße
silversurfer83
silversurfer83 (2023-06-14 16:18:00+00:00): Hi
Hast du meine Rückfrage registriert?
Penyelam (2023-06-14 18:57:38+00:00): Die Reiherwiese ist von Vor dem Dorfe bis etwa in der Mitte von Pfingstanger und Försterbrink gesperrt.
Penyelam (2023-06-15 22:58:55+00:00): Der kurze südliche Abschnitt Pfingstanger (zw. Reiherwiese und Vor dem Dorfe) fällt dann weg!
MxxCon (2023-06-07 03:57:35+00:00): Hello.
You added tag capacity=10, indicating that only 10 people can be there? Sure such a large open space can handle more people..
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136991472
lipuma (2023-06-07 13:24:33+00:00): Hi Igor,

This way has the tag `AREA_TERRE', are you sure this is correct?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1179865374
IgorEliezer (2023-06-07 15:49:02+00:00): I'm sure it is not. Removed. Thanks.
Baloo Uriza (2024-12-13 15:24:00+00:00): If the name of the railroad is not known, leaving it blank is fine.  But duplicating the operator in the name is a bit pointless.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136991590
Jrachi (2023-06-06 06:08:58+00:00): Ciao.
Hai modificato la rotonda del nuovo onte sul Sesia e hai rotto la relazione del percorso 782, anche con iD avresti dovuto accorgertene!
Ho rimesso a posto io.
Poi mi devi spiegare perché hai rimesso il name sulla rotonda, le rotonde non hanno un nome, o meglio non possono prendere il nome da una delle strade che vi confluiscono.

Ivo, Jrachi
csimeona22 (2023-06-06 18:49:16+00:00): Correction: Source used was Maxar SecureWatch Imagery 2023-02-06.
Ropino (2023-06-15 18:53:52+00:00): Hi,
highway=s\ ?
Please check/correct.
Thx in advance.
G_P_J (2023-06-16 07:12:39+00:00): Corrected.
HubMiner (2023-06-06 01:12:25+00:00): A business, with name, contact info, working website, why did you delete it?
SomeoneElse (2023-06-06 07:50:03+00:00): The node added here was one of a whole series of notes, accounts, and some edits that have exactly the same data format and content, apart from the location.

If you're happy that this one is genuine (maybe you've surveyed it in person, or have access to Mapillary etc. for this location) , please do undelete this node.
HubMiner (2023-06-06 12:17:30+00:00): Being a clone of many explains it for me, thank you.
Oregonian3 (2023-06-09 20:49:58+00:00): Hi Jordan, it seems like while you were updating the speed limits, you also removed road classification from most streets in this area, setting them all to tertiary instead. I meticulously classified the roads based on several factors, including freeway connections, connectivity, road quality, and more. Is there a reason that you set most of them to tertiary?
Jordan Leick (2023-06-13 03:26:04+00:00): Hi Oregonian3, I was trying to follow OSM Wiki guidelines for secondary roadway class, like most being lined with businesses, having 2 lanes per direction. Tertiary seemed like a better fit for those features + speed limit, and I tried to tag similar to how it was done in Minneapolis. But I may have gotten it wrong or misunderstood something, so I'm very open to hearing some specific examples that you think should not be tagged as tertiary.
Oregonian3 (2023-06-13 03:45:57+00:00): Hi Jordan. There's not really a clear consensus when it comes to classifying urban roads within the United States. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States/2021_Highway_Classification_Guidance details the rural classification system well, but has not been updated with urban guidelines yet. I have not contributed to the MN-specific page myself at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Minnesota/Minnesota_highway_classification, but it also deals more with rural classification rather than urban.

What I generally look for in urban areas is a combination of road quality (e.g. number of lanes, pavement, turn lane presence), importance to the network as a whole, and traffic counts. I'll use the examples of north/south routes in the Macalester-Groveland area, and why they might be classified in such a way:

Snelling is the only road in the area that is consistently at least two lanes in each direction, and provides the most major access to the entire area from the rest of the metro area via I-94. So primary makes sense for it. And as for Cretin north of Lake I'd view it as primary as well, since it's the main route from the east via I-94 into the southeastern Minneapolis areas in combo with Lake Street.

The rest of Cretin, Fairview, and Lexington are the ones I'd view as secondary roads. These provide access to the area from other freeways in the area. They're clearly less major routes than Snelling in the area since they only have one lane in each direction and not quite as much traffic, but they still have significant traffic and serve important connections into and out of the area. Hamline north of Ayd Mill is important alternate route between I-84 and I-35E for when the Snelling/Selby intersection inevitably backs up, so that's why I'd put it as secondary as well.

Mississippi River Blvd, Cleveland, and the rest of Hamline are much less important. They don't serve any regional connections into and out of the area, instead only serving local traffic. So that's why I'd keep these at tertiary.

Let me know if this helps at all for why I see the roads in the way I do.
Andrea Musuruane (2023-06-12 18:17:02+00:00): Ciao. Di questo avevamo già parlato qui: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132749397 Ripristino di conseguenza. Ciao, Andrea
Andrea Musuruane (2023-06-12 18:17:19+00:00): Ciao. Di questo avevamo già parlato qui: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132749397 Ripristino di conseguenza. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136992384
Andrea Musuruane (2023-06-12 18:17:30+00:00): Ciao. Di questo avevamo già parlato qui: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132749397 Ripristino di conseguenza. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136992384
dpolovinkin (2023-07-25 08:30:10+00:00): привет, а ты уверен что в около парковки на самом севере васьки (Way: 156618524) есть "Обрыв"?
Константин Гам (2023-07-25 12:36:39+00:00): Ну упасть с него реально.
dpolovinkin (2023-07-25 19:08:04+00:00): а, то есть там прямо возвышение этакое? чтото уже плохо припоминаю) ну тогда путем :)) может просто категорию поменять? все таки это не совсем "Обрыв"))
Константин Гам (2023-07-25 20:24:12+00:00): Не стоит дословно категории) ну и то из практики, придумаете лучше - меняйте смело
dpolovinkin (2024-05-08 05:25:56+00:00): привет еще раз, наткнулся - а этот вот паркинг - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/141137011#map=18/59.93793/30.21969, он был как паркинг затэган, ты его махнул на highway service или типо того, а что этот тэг значит? там же так же парковка и стоит?
Константин Гам (2024-05-08 05:41:46+00:00): amenity это сервис. Там, я обнаружил лишь брошенную площадку, где самостоянка или там появилась организация, разметка, знаки?
Константин Гам (2024-05-08 05:42:23+00:00): Тег означает территорию по которой можно ездить или стоять, но без особого статуса
dpolovinkin (2024-05-08 05:46:09+00:00): слушай хз, я просто там очень часто бывал, но уже как полгода не был точно, я не помню есть ли там прямо организация какая то, может просто самостоянка, специально не проверял) но в основном все таки кажется именно как стоянка юзается, а не просто поле рандомное, хз
Константин Гам (2024-05-08 08:01:37+00:00): Так пускай используется, как это меняет то что услуги сервиса стоянки там отсутствуют?
Ни жк, ни ктото частный ее там не организовал

У меня в районе *юзаются* газоны, из раскатали так, что нет уже травы, но это не сделало газон стоянкой
dpolovinkin (2024-05-08 09:16:30+00:00): понял) ну и ладно тогда, все равно штука не столь принципиальная) спасибс!
tastrax (2023-06-06 12:31:15+00:00): Nice work - "dams" on farms are tagged as reservoirs. If you can see the actual dam works that make the dam wall then that can be tagged as a dam. Hit the I button next to the tag for more information on tags. Cheers
tastrax (2023-06-06 12:54:08+00:00): Thanks for the updates - in OSM we add phone numbers with full international codes. I will update these businesses and you can check how its done. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features
tastrax (2023-06-06 11:25:48+00:00): Thanks for the updates (7MB local)
tastrax (2023-06-06 12:24:59+00:00): Nice work - thanks for the updates. Always good to have some locals on board.
tastrax (2023-06-06 11:20:32+00:00): When adding buildings its useful to use the Q key after assigning them as buildings. This will "square' the corners (given most buildings have square corners). Its also best practice to keep the area of your changesets small - in this case you have edited in both TAS and NSW. It would be better to have done them as separate changesets.
tastrax (2023-06-06 11:42:09+00:00): Thanks for those edits. The Guide association actually own that paddock - its just leased for horse agistment so technically still the same property. Its also best to edit an existing object rather than delete and start again. In that way the history of edits are preserved. In this case you could have reduced the area of the camp and then created the paddock. I also removed the name on the paddock as things like that are normally not named. Cheers
tastrax (2023-06-06 11:51:43+00:00): Welcome to OSM - have fun mapping your property!
Frans S (2023-06-06 10:12:10+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of the buildings and mapped accurate.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136992825
tastrax (2023-06-06 11:08:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted due to vandalism
tastrax (2023-06-06 11:11:09+00:00): Not a good start to your mapping. Please consider that whilst the map is open to all to edit its not a playground. If you require assistance in how to map then feel free to contact me.
tastrax (2023-06-06 12:20:34+00:00): Nice work - you can also use the Q key after assigning a building tag. This will square the corners of the buildings (given most buildings are square)
Hufkratzer (2023-06-06 21:41:36+00:00): Hi,
You have tagged three small areas leisure=horse_riding:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1179874501
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1179874554
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1179874555

These areas are so small they can hardly be riding centers (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dhorse_riding); maybe they are small riding arenas which are usually tagged leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian, iD preset with name "Horseback Riding / Rodeo Arena".
tastrax (2023-06-06 22:47:26+00:00): It was the original editor but I have updated those features.
ARandomTasmanian (2023-06-08 23:15:07+00:00): Thanks for the changes!
mueschel (2023-06-08 16:52:14+00:00): Hi,
what is the meaning of 'capacity:timed'? This tag is not used in any other place.
bdwz (2023-06-09 00:15:13+00:00): Hello,
I use "capacity:timed" to denote how many parking spaces have a maxstay to them, in this case 20 minutes.
mueschel (2023-06-09 11:51:04+00:00): Thanks for the details. 
I suggest to cut the parking in two pieces, one with maxstay = 20 minutes and one without. This would be the solution that can be understood by most tools.
bdwz (2023-06-09 11:57:29+00:00): The maxstay parking spots are split up by two disabled spaces in the middle-left. So, separate amenity=parking's in the northern row for: the leftmost spaces w/o maxstay, the 3? maxstay spaces on the left side, the 2 disabled parking spaces, and the rest of the maxstay spaces on the right side. Plus another amenity=parking for the lower row. Is that correct?
mueschel (2023-06-09 12:03:09+00:00): This is one way to do it. 
Another option:
You already mapped the individual parking spaces, so you can add the maxstay on these - similar to the disabled restriction you have on two of them.
bdwz (2023-06-09 12:08:30+00:00): I believe all 20 minute green curb spaces have been mapped with maxstay already, same with the disabled spaces. Is marking an amenity=parking with capacity tags purely redundant, if all parking spaces enclosed within are properly tagged?
mueschel (2023-06-09 14:01:12+00:00): From a tagging point of view this is redundant. But I'm sure there are plenty tools that read tags on amenity=parking but ignore amenity=parking_space altogether.

We don't have a tagging scheme to say that a part of a amenity=parking has a maxstay. So the most useful mapping might be the splitting of the lot as you proposed.
bdwz (2023-06-11 01:04:32+00:00): Just to update you on this: I currently do not intend to change what I currently have down, as it does not reflect the ground truth. At some point I will make a proposal for a tag like "capacity:timed", once I learn a bit more about the process.
mueschel (2023-06-11 07:34:13+00:00): Ok.
You don't need to write a full proposal right away. Just head to the tagging section of the OSM forum  and describe your idea to see how the general response is:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/general/tagging/70
mavl (2023-06-06 15:09:08+00:00): Здравствуйте. Извините, а что означает тег "Android=13"?  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1179892546
desk77 (2023-06-06 16:05:05+00:00): Здравствуйте. Извиняюсь, тэг был поставлен случайно, из буфера обмена.
mavl (2023-06-07 14:35:30+00:00): Понятно. Спасибо.
MxxCon (2023-06-07 04:06:38+00:00): Hello.
Short name tag is actually "short_name=", not name:short
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136995109
mikeocool (2023-06-09 12:35:00+00:00): Ahh thanks for catching!
angys (2023-09-27 17:12:54+00:00): Hii, thanks for edit around Ekoflora. Actually there is a OSM Telegram community group in Malaysia. While these terrace building can actually be drawn easily using JOSM sofware, terracer