piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
archie (2025-06-29 23:35:14+00:00): Hej,
jag kan inte hitta vägnamn "Bräcke", dvs jag har inte kunnat verifiera att väg med detta namn finns. Det finns en Bräckevägen i närheten, men "Bräcke" refererar till traktbeteckningen. addr:place var korrekt efter vad jag kan se. Varför ändrade du?
archie (2025-06-29 23:37:37+00:00): Glöm det; jag tolkade fel. Du taggade om till korrekta addr:place. 

Tack!
archie (2025-06-29 23:42:39+00:00): ... däremot har du sju (7) st addr:street = Rösselvik kvar istf addr:place=Rösselvik...
archie (2025-06-29 23:47:16+00:00): ... och Tyfta https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12877452924
Amsvartnir (2025-07-03 09:21:10+00:00): Hej! Tack för dina kommentarer. Efter att ha tittat lite närmare på det här med Bräcke/Bräckevägen är jag nu lite osäker då det är olika bud från Lantmäteriet, Google Maps och Apple Maps. När man tittar på Lantmäteriets (som väl borde vara mest tillförlitligt) "Min karta" visas inte namnet direkt på vägen, men om man söker på till exempel "Bräcke 574" så får man fram resultatet "Bräckevägen 574" istället, så Lantmäteriet verkar alltså betrakta det som Bräckevägen. Tycker du att vi ska ändra till "addr:street Bräckevägen" eller låta det vara "addr:place Bräcke"? Finns det någon praxis?

När det gäller Tyfta och Rösselvik så har jag mycket riktigt blandat ihop det, så det bör absolut ändras till addr:place.
archie (2025-07-03 13:56:59+00:00): Ja, det där är en smula märkligt. Jag brukar kolla och hålla mig till Lantmäteriet och NVDB (https://nvdbpakarta.trafikverket.se/map) vad gäller väg-/gatunamn. I vår det av världen är det ju inte upp till var och en att hitta på dessa namn. Jag har gjort så på en hel del ställen, att när ett officiellt namn inte fanns i nyss nämnda källor, så har jag döpt om påstått vägnamn till loc_name samt lagt till noname=yes samt angivit källorna till noname (dvs Lantmäteriet och NVDB). 
Hela det där Nordviksberg-området - jag tror personligen inte att detta är officiella gatunamn (kan inte verifieras i ovan nämnda källor). 
Du känner till att du i viss mån kan kolla korrektheten av adresser här: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=addresses&lon=11.62445&lat=57.96637&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=buildings%2Cbuildings_with_addresses%2Cpostal_code%2Centrances_deprecated%2Centrances%2Cno_addr_street%2Cstreet_not_found%2Cplace_not_found%2Cmisformatted_housenumber_lenient%2Cnodes_with_addresses_defined%2Cnodes_with_addresses_interpolated%2Cinterpolation%2Cinterpolation_errors%2Cconnection_lines%2Cnearest_points%2Cnearest_roads%2Cnearest_areas%2Caddrx_on_nonclosed_way%2Cbuildings%2Cbuildings_with_addresses%2Cpostal_code%2Centrances_deprecated%2Centrances%2Cno_addr_street%2Cstreet_not_found%2Cplace_not_found%2Cmisformatted_housenumber_lenient%2Cnodes_with_addresses_defined%2Cnodes_with_addresses_interpolated%2Cinterpolation%2Cinterpolation_errors%2Cconnection_lines%2Cnearest_points%2Cnearest_roads%2Cnearest_areas%2Caddrx_on_nonclosed_way   ?
Amsvartnir (2025-07-06 18:28:05+00:00): Tack för tipsen! Jag är i högsta grad nybörjare när det gäller OpenStreetMap, så de där sidorna kände jag inte till. Tack!
felipeeugenio (2025-07-01 12:25:43+00:00): Corregido
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168286459
Yog Sot (2025-07-01 13:49:05+00:00): niepotrzebnie poprzyklejałeś granice administracyjnie chronionych obszarów. 
Zaraz ktoś poprzesówa ogrodzenia, zabudowe, itp i nie zauwazy, że powinien najpierw odkleić od chronionego obszaru, więc no cóż, życie.
Sylabowy Kot (2025-07-01 20:57:19+00:00): To może inaczej - na przyszłość, Feskil, stosuj funkcję Rozłącz w takich przypadkach. Niestety, chyba każdy program do edycji OSM chce domyślnie łączyć węzły. Mógłby przeglądarkowy iD przynajmniej z automatu rozłączać tego typu węzły, bo skąd np. Feskil miałby wiedzieć, że zrobił coś źle.
Comino (2025-07-01 07:21:24+00:00): Hi DeAllen,

In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes".

Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag !
Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead.

For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Merchants#legacy-tags
and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bitcoin

Happy mapping,

Edwin
digistrorf (2025-10-11 00:45:08+00:00): Why did you move Big River Isuzu, Nissan and Toyota?
user_5359 (2025-07-01 08:19:29+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Based on your comment: Please only draw what really exists. This also applies to the road that is underground (layer=-1). If you need help to clean up: You are welcome
rcharliesaurus (2025-07-01 12:33:13+00:00): yes please clean up. i don’t know what im doing. i thought this was a sandbox.
wambag (2025-06-30 01:29:54+00:00): It appeared that the international border was accidentally skewed by being erroneously attached to a natural=wood feature. I could not find any evidence that the border was anything but straight. Aligned border by lining up Monument 19A and 19C, and moving 19B in line.
NeisBot (2025-06-30 01:37:20+00:00): Hi rcharliesaurus, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: ""

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish #AIgenerated
NeisReview (2025-06-30 06:18:35+00:00): Comment could be "Added and modified roads, including mini-roundabouts and bridges, with updates to highway classifications and street names."
Joseph R P (2025-06-30 21:08:34+00:00): While it is fully grade-separated, it's very short, and technically not part of the real motorway here, which would be the Airport Connector—this part of Paradise Road branches off the terminus of the Airport Connector at the series of terminal access flyovers before the tunnel. Another reason for this being primary over motorway would be it's narrow arterial road-like concrete median and low speed (35 mph), making it feel like a regular road when you drive along it instead of like a freeway as does the Connector. Part of the Airport Connector does have a low speed limit, but it retains a freeway-like structure and the speed limit increases once it exits the tunnel, whereas Paradise Road is just an arterial road that passes through an interchange partially, connecting to the other freeway at its end. Granted that it's a halfway combination between arterial road and freeway, I supplemented that with the expressway tag.
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-06-30 22:50:40+00:00): Alright, I'll go ahead and change it back to a primary road. Thanks for the information!
sl1wyif (2025-06-30 03:28:47+00:00): Added an arcade building and additional store information.
Claudius Henrichs (2025-07-02 12:59:43+00:00): Hi,
You have removed the majority of track members for multiple routes as part of this changeset. E.g.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17271811
and
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17271812
which are now almost empty. Any chance you can fix that or should I go ahead and revert?

Best,
Claudius
LachlanTansey2009 (2025-08-06 23:09:38+00:00): Hello, 
Thank you for raising this concern with me. I have since removed the Victoria Park relations in their entireity.
sl1wyif (2025-06-30 03:29:15+00:00): Added a hair salon
NeisBot (2025-06-30 02:28:56+00:00): Hi sl1wyif, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: ""

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish #AIgenerated
sl1wyif (2025-06-30 03:27:20+00:00): Added buildings in industrial area and a supermarket, a store in it.
NeisReview (2025-06-30 06:16:05+00:00): 👍 Thank you for your map updates.
citrula (2025-06-30 17:55:38+00:00): welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contribution. This edit looks good to me.
FajrAl (2025-07-02 01:06:23+00:00): Gunakan tombol Q untuk menyiku sudut. Disarankan menggunakan citra satelit Esri.
fortera_au (2025-06-30 06:10:56+00:00): Hi, building=yes shouldn't be removed if the building still exists, and shop=pasta should be replaced with amenity=restaurant and cuisine=pasta
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168289759
Hungerburg (2025-07-04 12:27:46+00:00): Salu Fabrice, is there anything that makes this path special or is this just the way you went? Remember, route relations in openstreetmap are to be based on reproducible on the ground stuff.
tontonfabrice (2025-07-04 15:21:08+00:00): Hello, I've been on this trail and there are hiking signs at every junction.
Hungerburg (2025-07-04 17:10:30+00:00): Sure, I know them, they abound here. What I wanted to know, e.g. was there a trail number on them, that anybody could follow along?
tontonfabrice (2025-07-05 02:29:25+00:00): No, there's no track number, but if you have a problem with what I've done, you can remove it.
Hungerburg (2025-07-05 20:37:58+00:00): The local community decided against ad-hoc route relations where there is nothing specific on the ground, which could be created from almost any place to any other place.

Where are you from, how is that handled in your local community?
NeisBot (2025-06-30 03:48:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-07-05 19:33:19+00:00): Thanks for your corrections.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168289968
Joseph R P (2025-07-04 15:02:57+00:00): Hello, when adding road names, please be sure to use the road name's full suffix (e.g. 'Boulevard' instead of 'BLVD') per OSM's standardization guidelines. Thanks!
user_8655426 (2025-07-07 13:01:09+00:00): こんにちは。OpenStreetMapへようこそ！
この変更セットで、大きな森林全体がキャンプ場に変更されていたため、もとに戻させていただきました。
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168604162
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11073268/history

お手数をおかけしますが、再度、キャンプ場の追加をお願いいたします。
name=小田急山中湖フォレストコテージ
tourism=camp_site

JA:Tag:tourism=camp_site (キャンプ場のマッピング方法)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Tag:tourism=camp%20site?uselang=ja

Happy Mapping!
TrickyFoxy (2025-06-30 17:29:10+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168320290
Gregory Peony (2025-07-23 23:00:27+00:00): Hi, you idenitfied buildings in imagery but they are not accrately mapped. Do not add layer tags to hide 'resolve' overlapping data issues who's root cause is inaccurate geometry. I recommend watching the new mapper mistakes videos on this page https://www.youtube.com/@TheMissingMaps ---Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168291350
literan (2025-06-30 19:43:51+00:00): это не название
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Названия#Не_подходите_к_названиям_формально[1]
mavl (2026-05-03 05:38:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 182142872 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20224].
Mashin (2025-06-30 11:30:16+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM!

All looks good. Thanks for your edit.

Cheers
pangoSE (2025-09-27 17:06:37+00:00): hej, den här leden saknar ways verkar det som.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-25 11:38:27+00:00): reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410  and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969  remain not answered

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173752230
JeroenHoek (2025-06-30 08:19:21+00:00): Dit is gek. Dat zou StreetComplete toch niet meer doen?
JeroenHoek (2025-06-30 08:21:31+00:00): Triggert die misschien omdat daar nog een oude segregated=yes op stond? Alsnog een bug trouwens, want foot=use_sidepath.
Tjuro (2025-06-30 09:02:04+00:00): StreetComplete heeft een aantal wijzigingen gedaan, maar tot de dag van vandaag wordt er gemiddeld op een paar fietspaden in Nederland footway:surface en cycleway:surface gezet.

Deze kan je onderverdelen in nieuwe mappers die meerdere quests achter elkaar doen, dus eerst segregated=yes toevoegen en een minut later cycleway:surface. De “AddCyclewayPartSurface”.

Deze wordt niet gedaan als het fietspad een sidewalk= tag heeft. Wel met sidewalk:side=

Verder heb je ook nog de surfaceOverlay, die negeert alles daar kan je gewoon alles toe voegen, daarbij hangt het af of hij wel of geen segregated=yes heeft.

Ik ben nu al bijna een jaar bezig met het voorkomen van nieuwe cycleway:surface op fietspaden. Maar het vervelende is dat dit vaak wordt gedaan door nieuwe mensen met onder de 100 wijzigingen en informeren dus eigenlijk niks doet.
JeroenHoek (2025-06-30 09:06:08+00:00): Meld je zulke cases ook bij StreetComplete in de bug-tracker? Goedwillende newbie-mappers informeren is inderdaad zinloos. Het valt niet uit te leggen dat zo'n tool het fout doet en hun tijd verspilt.
Tjuro (2025-06-30 09:28:17+00:00): Ik heb wel eens een melding gedaan, maar het probleem is meer de gehele houding en filosofie van SC, waarbij het niet gaat om OSM maar geforceerd nieuwe tags te spammen, en hun interpretatie van tags zoals segregated=yes te hanteren.

Verder is de app qua techniek best limiterend, elke quest moet een verandering teweeg brengen in osm, ook als echte mappers iets leeg zouden laten. Dit komt omdat hun niet zelf iets bijhouden.

Ook word er geen rekening gehouden met verschillende landen, de oost Europese tagging word er doorheen gedrukt.
Baloo Uriza (2025-07-12 23:33:47+00:00): This was an unnecessary and quite low quality edit.  Please take a look at the placement=* tag and refrain from moving junction nodes away from the actual junctions.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168292353
sarya_Lyft (2025-07-22 10:13:32+00:00): Hi Baloo Uriza,

My name is Surander, and I'm a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. Thank you very much for pointing this out.
According to our approach, we try to realign roads to the middle if there is significant misalignment according to the backgrounds and telemetry. However, in this case, I missed the other approach of indicating that the road is not drawn in the middle by using the already applied placement tag. I sincerely apologize for this error, where I failed to consider all the available information. Thank you very much for correcting it.

Best regards, Surander
evgenykatyshev (2025-06-30 07:21:31+00:00): Hello! Thank for you contribution.

I'm not sure that you wanted to make exactly what you've done. You've created small park within other bigger park. Please check it.

Also it's better not to connect borders of park to pathways go along it.
Superilosa (2025-07-03 19:21:30+00:00): I fixed and it is no longer connected to parkway. As of small park being inside bigger park, it is a newly opened park, which is actually a small installation and a sign that says "იოსებ ჟორდანიას სკვერი". I am not sure if its just that small bit or if they named whole park around that name. But the signpost is only standing in the newly opened section and not standing at any entrance of the bigger park, which makes me wonder.
yelisey90 (2025-06-30 09:44:09+00:00): Hi! The previous version was actually more correct. Even though the signs often call such parks as "Square" in English, this is incorrect; English "square" is equivalent to Georgian მოედანი, while Georgian სკვერი is best rendered as "park" in English. In OSM a standardised translation is preferred, even though a physical sign may present a different translation.
aharvey (2025-07-08 02:40:31+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6715096557/history isn't "Colourful Yunnan", that's already mapped at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/916580298. I'll revert it back to disused:shop.
aharvey (2025-07-08 02:43:37+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5583351392/history is not "Pho Thin" that's already mapped at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/916580297 I've reverted it back to disused:shop
aharvey (2025-07-08 02:45:14+00:00): Are you sure Mama Mulan which was mapped at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5729379221/history is closed down? I believe it's still there...
aharvey (2025-07-08 02:47:38+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7373994785 is not T2 that was already mapped at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6552009371 I've reverted that change.
NeisBot (2025-06-30 06:16:37+00:00): Hi AONTEST, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Removed clinic and parking areas, and adjusted footway geometries, deleting numerous nodes and ways in the process."

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish #AIgenerated
NeisReview (2025-07-02 12:20:13+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168355420
pwbriggs (2025-11-20 07:28:47+00:00): Why remove bus=yes? iD is actively warning me that the stops are missing that tag.

Thanks.
Lumikeiju (2025-11-21 20:19:52+00:00): Hi! This edit was made based on the discussion in https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/bus-stop-aggiunta-di-bus-yes/127800/8 and the posts by ToniE, developer of PTNA, who I trust knows PTv2 better than me!

I don't feel too strongly on it - validator flags are just that, not necessarily to be followed, but unfortunately their existence forms a lot of inertia. 🤷🏼‍♀️
Shaun das Schaf (2025-07-06 10:37:30+00:00): Hallo margin-auto,

die Position war nicht ganz korrekt (zu weit nordwestlich). Ich habe es nun noch richtig eingetragen:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=168555082

Viele Grüße
Shaun das Schaf
margin-auto (2025-07-06 11:42:07+00:00): Danke für die Ergänzung
Yog Sot (2025-07-01 13:55:15+00:00): nie ustawiamy dostępności dla każdego typu pojazdu z osobna jesli wartość ogólna jest znana i ustawiona, a wszystkie pozostałe typy są z nią zgodne.
lonerider543 (2025-06-30 06:41:07+00:00): If someone can correct the actual ending of the footpath leading north along the old swannington incline that would be great
db-ak (2025-06-30 10:24:21+00:00): A sprawdzałeś czy na wjeździe z Sanockiej w Krzywoustego jest już B-6/8/9? Jakiś czas temu nie było i mogłeś wjechać rowerem, skuterem, traktorem na drogę by przekonać się że albo skręcasz na autostradę, albo jedziesz ekspresówką albo cofasz. xd
Mercanto123 (2025-06-30 12:03:40+00:00): Tam nie dotarłem jeszcze - jak tam będę to wezmę to pod uwagę. :)
Mercanto123 (2025-06-30 12:27:48+00:00): Napisałem maila do MIR opisującego problem tego typu niekonsekwencji i nielogiczności w mieście, ciekawe co mi odpisze :)
Yog Sot (2025-07-01 13:58:31+00:00): skręcając z Torowej w Krzywoustego tego znaku zakazu nie widać, więc nie mozna ostawiać zakazu na takim przebiegu
Ponadto czym jest motywowany zakaz na nitce z przeciwnym kierunkiem ruchu?
Temat był wałkowany. Zakazy się stawia tylko jak faktycznie są.
Supaplex (2025-06-30 10:41:17+00:00): 加access=private不就好了？
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168294243
chubi (2025-07-03 12:04:50+00:00): 你的方法的確更好，謝謝建議
Supaplex (2025-07-05 03:56:45+00:00): 如果有人還是抱怨，可以轉給OpenStreetMap台灣的社群信箱處理回覆
或是Data Working Group，解釋無法去移除私人產權內可以公開核實的內容，但可以加上access=private處理
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168294243
user_5359 (2025-07-01 08:11:28+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You move two points more than 100 meters. Please check all points for correct position.
NeisReview (2025-06-30 07:36:30+00:00): Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Thanks for adding your shop. It looks like there might have been an issue creating a relation here, perhaps something unintended? If you'd like, I can help remove the element for you.

Thanks again.
bkil (2025-06-30 09:16:43+00:00): The node is missing a primary tag and the website syntax is invalid. Should we revert the whole change instead if we don't get a timely answer to this question?
infeeeee (2025-07-03 13:36:43+00:00): It was a trivial fix: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168444809

Please do not revert such changesets, where you can easily verify it online... It was quicker to add the missing tags than to type this comment...
bkil (2025-07-03 15:31:51+00:00): This is not the place to discuss this, but the issue is well documented and already has history. TL;DR such US agents who understand neither Hungarian (as per the changeset comment) nor OSM are spamming links to their clients on all platforms possible with bots. Please tell the writer of such spam bots to open map notes instead (or to learn OSM and edit them up manually properly). Many US mappers already delete this on sight without question.
bkil (2025-07-03 16:35:46+00:00): Even worse: they probably pipe the store address into the Google Maps API to geolocate its position and add the OSM point at that coordinate, which may be way off from the true position of said feature, let alone being against the terms of service of OSM.
limes11 (2025-06-30 11:29:37+00:00): Moin,

danke für das Erfassen !
Könntest du die boundary=protected_area, protect_class=4, protection_title=Naturschutzgebiet, short_protection_title=NSG
tags gleich mit eintragen ? Dann wäre es vollständig. (Das leisure=nature_reserve ist ja eher ein Relikt, das eher aus Traditionsgründen verwendet wird.)

Besten Dank !!
chris66 (2025-06-30 20:39:15+00:00): Mal sehen. Bin ja KISS Mapper und leisure=nature-reserve ist noch nicht deprecated.
limes11 (2025-07-01 18:05:39+00:00): Der Tag ist sehr unspezifisch und wurden in den letzten Jahren unkontrolliert für jegliche Landstriche verwendet, die vom Mapper als schützenswert betrachtet wurden. 

Das boundary=protected_area - Schema löst diese Ungenauigkeit und erlaubt es, unterschiedliche Schutzgebietsklassen sauber zu erfassen.  Daher hat sich diese Mapping generell durchgesetzt. 

Ich ergänze die fehlenden Tags so oder so, da es unmöglich ist, der Erfassung systematisch zu folgen, wenn man lediglich leisure=nature_reserve verwendet. Von daher lediglich die Bitte, diese Arbeit gleich beim Eintrag zu erledigen.