piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
1998alexkane (2023-08-14 14:56:43+00:00): Hi,
Ja, iD und JOSM warnen darüber, wenn man versucht einen Weg zu löschen, der teil einer Relation steht. (in iD muss man erst den Weg aus die Relation entfernen, um einen Weg zu löschen)
LG
Alex
tux67 (2023-08-14 15:00:51+00:00): Danke, bei JOSM weiß ich das - iD nutze ich selten und in der Vergangenheit meine ich mich zu erinnern, daß bei schon mal hiccups hatte.
Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139848084
Aim311_ (2023-08-14 09:56:18+00:00): Edytujesz z fotela, bo poprawiłeś przebiegi ścieżek i dróg posiłkując się wadliwymi danymi gps.
Yog Sot (2023-08-15 15:04:34+00:00): Nie, edytuję z fotela, bo jest wygodny, a nie dlatego jak dajesz cynk. 
Szykuje się cykl pamiętliwych rajdów, zapisy som otwarte.
Aim311_ (2023-08-15 21:15:29+00:00): Mam nadzieję, że się nie poddasz i na jednym rajdzie nie zakończysz swojej walki.
Jeśli regularnie będziesz chodził śladem, który dodałeś, do tego skrzykniesz ekipę to całkiem szybko wydepczesz pierwszą ścieżkę łączącą Mrowino z Pamiątkowem.
Yog Sot (2023-08-16 16:46:55+00:00): robimy tak od dwóch lat.
airdace (2023-09-27 08:53:02+00:00): A Palota úton a kerékpáros címkézés pontatlan volt, javítottam. (cycleway=yes címke nem használatos, kerékpársáv esetén a cycleway=lane a helyes)
leveskockaa (2023-10-04 10:02:26+00:00): Köszönöm!
treestryder (2024-07-04 02:46:15+00:00): This is a multi-use path, not a cycleway.
 * https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpath
 * https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Michigan#Pedestrian_ways

The names are on the respective relations. No need to also have the name on the way. Look at the various renders, doing so is causing an echo affect with the name doubled up and confusing.
Trail_Caretaker (2024-07-04 12:54:16+00:00): Ok, I think I understand what you mean.  So, for instance, if a large trail like North Country Trail is correctly marked with the relation of "North Country Trail", then the trail should not be named the same, otherwise both of the names will render?  Just leave it blank or label the path with a local trail name?  Is that what you are saying?  Thanks for bringing this up.
treestryder (2024-07-06 16:20:47+00:00): > otherwise both of the names will render? 

Depends on the renderer, but in general, yes. A name will render for every object given a name. Trail names in bridges make it look like the bridge has a name of its own. Even more confusing, a search for a name will return every object given that name. It can be hard to pick out a trail's overall relation amongst the noise. 

> Just leave it blank or label the path with a local trail name? 

When I do not have the time to create a relation and document it on our Michigan trail project's wiki page [1], or the trail is short, I will add the name just to the trail's largest segment. Naming one segment is enough to make the trail render, be searchable, and show amongst routing instructions. And, I only name a thing after I have found its name on a sign or official document [2]. 


[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Michigan/Trails 
[2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_use_name_tag_to_describe_things
treestryder (2024-07-06 16:22:07+00:00): Why the change from highway=path to highway=cycleway?
Trail_Caretaker (2024-07-08 18:10:07+00:00): Which path are you speaking of?  I only see a large changeset square on the map.  It doesn't show me what path you are speaking of.  I was taught by a local OSM mapper that is really knowledgeable about OSM, that unless it is designed or designated for bikes to commute or travel longer distances, that it should just be marked as a path, and not a cycleway.  Is there a way that you could show me the exact path so that I can understand what you are saying?  If I made a mistake, I apologize.
treestryder (2024-07-09 04:42:27+00:00): I have found where you have changed path to cycleway a couple of times. This conversation began after I discovered this edit (while talking to someone cycling The Great Lake to Lake Trail). It is, however, 11 months old and things may have changed since then. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/813680569  

The source of truth for all things OpenStreetMap (and the mechanism used for determining future truths) is the Wiki. From what I have gathered reading the wiki is "footway" and "cycleway" pre-date "path" by many years. They likely came from British legal terms. As OpenStreetMap matured the access and path tags were added. The big different between footway, cycleway, and path is their implied access values. 

* footway is foot=dedicated 
* cycleway is bicycle=dedicated 
* path is motor_vehicle=no 

From https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access : 
    "Access values pre-eminently describe legal permissions/restrictions and should follow ground truth, such as signage or legal ruling, and not involve guesswork. It does not describe common or typical use, even if the signage is generally ignored." 

In Michigan, we primarily use the "Signposted foot and bicycle path." example found here: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpath 

See the Michigan wiki for further explanation. If that page isn't clear, let me know and I will try to improve it.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Michigan#Pedestrian_ways
Frans S (2023-08-16 12:25:24+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please tag buildings as building=yes
You tagged them as highway=residential. (corrected by me)s
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139848718
moje_konto (2023-08-14 01:16:13+00:00): www.openstreetmap.org/node/5073797425

Czy numer budynku piekarni na pewno poprawny?

Na tym budynku jest naniesione 74, a 72 jest na budynku obok.
Buchel (2023-08-14 07:25:04+00:00): Poprawione :)
Buchel (2023-08-16 13:14:37+00:00): Sprawdziłem na miejscu i zarówno budynek gdzie jest Bumerang, jak i piekarnia Pod Strzechą mają adres Chojnicka 72.
moje_konto (2023-08-17 03:21:50+00:00): Widzę, że biznesy w tym budynku różnie podają numer na www: 72 albo 72/74. Są to różne działki i osobne budynki, więc ciężko stwierdzić dlaczego tak, być może były tam zmiany numerów, więc może to być przejściowe.

Można wpisać inny numer do punktu biznesu, gdy taki występuje na miejscu - ale wtedy trzeba dodać znacznik "note" z wyjaśnieniem różnicy z ewidencją i datą sprawdzenia. Inaczej ktoś może poprawić z ewidencji lub przesunąć.

Na samym budynku bym zostawił 74 skoro Biedronka podaje 72/74. Chyba że cały budynek jest oznaczony 72, ale wtedy też "note".

Małe sklepiki na froncie działki, przed 78, powielają główny adres, więc tam numer raczej należy do dużego budynku, ale mogą być dodane też do biznesu. Zakładam, że tak było też z 76.
ivanbranco (2023-08-14 09:45:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 139848958.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-08-14 01:10:12+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1908400949
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/674160984

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Buchel (2023-08-14 07:24:51+00:00): @NorthCrab_upload dzięki! Poprawione :)
NorthCrab (2023-08-14 12:58:23+00:00): Proszę i pozdrawiam :-)!
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2023-08-14 14:41:00+00:00): This road is not prohibited for pedestrian. It is not pedestrian-friendly, but people can walk on the side of the road. Please revert.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2023-08-14 14:41:42+00:00): Only motorways and roads with specific pedestrian prohibited signs roads cannot be walked in Quebec. There is no such sign there.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2023-08-14 14:45:11+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139875279
jmarchon (2023-08-14 13:51:20+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Nice work!
BatyD (2023-08-15 00:23:20+00:00): Hello! I edited this segment because Strava does not recognize the short segment. I figured it might be the underlaying data that prevented this. However, after the change, no difference. Any idea why this segment would not be recognized as a valid connection through map routing apps?
hrhino (2023-08-15 00:48:27+00:00): It's possible that Strava hasn't updated with the latest version of the map yet; many consumers only sync up with OSM periodically.
jmarchon (2023-08-15 01:29:49+00:00): Strava uses Mapbox which can take upwards of a month to update certain objects.
MxxCon (2023-08-16 02:53:10+00:00): Hello.
When mapping features, please pay attention not to accidentally glue/attach them to each other. In this case you glued no-standing traffic sign to a sidewalk. iD editor has a tendency to snap things to each other so please pay attention to that.👍🙂
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139849448
pjrt (2023-08-16 14:22:06+00:00): Fixed!
Fizzie-DWG (2023-12-19 10:22:49+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145285123
user_5359 (2023-08-14 06:25:09+00:00): Hello! Please check the restriction relation https://www.osm.org/relation/13350345. The role from and via is missing.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-12-19 10:22:38+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145285116
Fizzie-DWG (2023-12-19 10:21:09+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145285058
da13 (2024-09-20 18:56:38+00:00): This edit was a test to see how long until someone reverts it.
kenken234 (2023-08-14 12:50:29+00:00): Yes, the PIE exit is closed/rerouted. But you have edited access tags along Thomson Road which is still open. I've reversed this changeset
Frans S (2023-08-21 09:19:05+00:00): A new mapper !  Welcome. We hope you will enjoy mapping.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings need to be improved to meet the quality standards of HOTOSM.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document for more info)
A: E: Inaccurate mapped and / or not squared.
C: Collecting multiple buildings and mapping them as 1 building.
F: Mapping of buildings partly hidden by trees.
Please solve the issues shown by the issue triangle before you upload your mappings.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139850430
BCNorwich (2023-08-15 06:59:42+00:00): I've removed Way: 1197847104 as it's duplication, please be careful to not duplicate highways.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2023-08-15 07:03:12+00:00): Further, I've removed all 5 highways, for the same reason.
Mr_Beeblebrox (2023-08-14 03:19:39+00:00): https://www.york.gov.uk/york-city-centre/city-walls/2

Turns out this is an actual name - is there a way to quickly undo this erroneous change?
SomeoneElse (2024-08-26 09:55:57+00:00): I was chasing down a rendering problem wondering why the name did not appear at https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#22/53.95317/-1.08447 , and then realised that someone had removed it!
To answer the question, the easiest way to "undo an erroneous change" in a case like this is just to "edit it again and add the name back".  There are various changeset revert options, but none are as quick in a case like this as just editing it, as I've just done in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155773016 .  
Cheers,
Andy
gscholz (2023-08-15 07:16:03+00:00): Hi RottenLynx,
your recent edits have left behind a big amount of errors regarding self intersecting ways:


https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-85.92701&lat=11.87755&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?

I am wondering how this could happen even you are using JOSM. May be you like to educate yourself about how to use its internal validator:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Validator

You also tend to stick landuse areas to roads or streams etc. Please look closely to the images, actually the boundaries of these areas do not start in the middle of the roads.

Kind regards
Guido
Fizzie-DWG (2023-08-14 06:11:12+00:00): Hello siyopipreverts. Can we ask what you are attempting to do here? You added a name that had previously been reverted as being fake, than immediately turned around & deleted it again? This also seems very strange behaviour for a brand new mapper? We await your reply. Graeme Fitzpatrick,
OSMF Data Working Group
user_20069226 (2023-08-14 23:32:29+00:00): Hello Fizzie41. What was happening was I was reverting a changeset that had reverted good changes but also bad ones. It would have taken a long time to manually add all the good changes back. Immediately after, I deleted all the bad changes, such as the fake names here.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-08-18 02:56:32+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7421.
user_5359 (2023-08-14 06:14:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I remove your SEO SPAM entry (mostly foreign keys)
Ilia  Tsygankov (2023-12-18 13:58:57+00:00): Hi! It's look like you not add a tag to a drinking water source, but make another object with different tags and coordinates (previous one is also changed by you, but 1 year ago)
DD1GJ (2023-08-14 21:40:48+00:00): Revert, war zuvor korrekt, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Demergency_access_point
Fizzie-DWG (2023-08-18 02:33:33+00:00): Hello olivercats. Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7420. Graeme Fitzpatrick, OSMF Data Working Group
MxxCon (2023-08-16 02:55:39+00:00): wow.
I'm surprised your browser didn't explode from so many changes in one changeset. :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139853210
MxxCon (2023-09-18 05:47:22+00:00): Looks like this edit mangled height= tag too. For example way 247458385.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139853210
MapSpot (2023-09-18 15:25:38+00:00): My bad. This changeset predates iD's updated Townhouse preset, so tags had to be manipulated manually. Looks like a new line wasn't created and mixed the height and house tags together. Fixed in changeset 141430097. Luckily only impacted 72 buildings and not hundreds.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139853210
MxxCon (2023-09-18 16:09:14+00:00): Perhaps it's worth checking some of your other changesets for similar errors
MapSpot (2023-09-18 18:51:09+00:00): Of course. I ran a query for any buildings with building=house and no height=* tag to make about 150 corrections overall.
The remaining cases are buildings that were mapped after the 2014 import and never had a height tag to begin with.
Bolt026 (2023-11-02 15:23:33+00:00): Hello Naya :) 
I would like to ask you about the fixes that were done to way/26889628, as I've noticed some address issues related to it. According to the official website: https://www.mvk.ee/et the address of this school should be: Heki tee 16, with polygon already existing at that location: way/109386983.
Can you please take a look?
Thank you!
Regards,
Catalina
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-11-02 17:51:06+00:00): Good catch! There is no such school. I'll change it back to kindergarten. It's possible that some grades from school operate here, but then they should be added as a node, with correct address and with correct school name.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-11-02 18:03:34+00:00): Also removed district from address, since it's usually not used for city districts and we don't have an agreement on how to use it. @Naya feel free to come to our community to discuss it, if you believe we should use districts in addresses https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/ee/79
Bolt026 (2023-11-03 06:56:00+00:00): Thank you so much, @qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq for confirming this and for your fixes!
Happy mapping!
Frans S (2023-08-14 09:28:45+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
 A new mapper !  Welcome. We hope you will enjoy mapping.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings need to be improved to meet the quality standards of HOTOSM.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document for more info)
* Please be sure the object you want to map is a building. When there is no shadow next to it, or traces of human activity, it is mostly not a building.  Buildings have mostly a gray or brown roof. Green means trees or scrub.
You mapped quite a lot of non-visible objects as a building in farmland. I checked several images, they all don't show objects.
* Quality prevails over quantity!!


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139854968
Msiipola (2025-01-04 14:19:58+00:00): Hej! Det här området är markerad som "construction". Är bygget klart? Och hur är det med cykelvägen genom området?
Tomas Marklund (2025-01-04 16:32:07+00:00): Hej!
Oj, ja, det blev klart nån gång i sommar. Cykelvägen var mycket riktigt innanför staketet, man fick cykla på vägen istället. Nu finns det en mur mellan cykelväg och strand, jag fixade det med nytt changeset. 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160992930
TrickyFoxy (2026-06-13 16:20:48+00:00): Что значит survey_point:conditional=good?

https://osm.org/node/11110240215
П3тр0виЧъ (2026-06-13 16:25:59+00:00): Состояние пункта. Гуд, значит пункт (вышка) целый, бэд — только пеньки бетонные остались, железо спёрли.
MxxCon (2023-08-16 03:01:18+00:00): Hello.
It seems like you combined 2 pizza nodes into one mixing their addresses. Could you explain what you were trying to do here?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139855247
GeorgeKaplan (2023-08-14 07:56:45+00:00): Erratum sur la description : c'est plus du nettoyage/correction que de l'amélioration.
redd (2023-08-15 16:07:47+00:00): super, danke
arjunaraoc (2023-08-15 00:51:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia)

For adding a business, you may like to trey https://www.onosm.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139857214
arjunaraoc (2023-08-15 00:53:42+00:00): Sorry, I  think you added it properly. I misunderstood, when I just looked at changeset comment.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139857214
arjunaraoc (2023-08-15 01:00:47+00:00): One suggestion, you can also add addr:housenumber etc (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:*)  as well and also phone number,(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone)
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139857214
TheBestIdea (2023-09-18 20:07:39+00:00): This block of Bond was reversed and made oneway n/b for cars in December 2022
fkumasum (2023-09-20 11:18:35+00:00): Hi,

Thank you for going through my edit and providing feedback. I overlooked sign board and it was an honest mistake from my end, I'll be more careful going forward. Please find changeset #: 141508264 with correct edits.

Thank You,
fkumasum
phoenixsaigon1698 (2023-09-16 09:43:14+00:00): Please add "via" member of the relation 16198519
streckenkundler (2023-08-14 09:11:19+00:00): Hallo,

OSM ist keine Malkarte. Bitte Daten ungehend entfernen und alternativ Dienste wie UMap benutzen.
https://umap.openstreetmap.de/en/

Danke. streckenkundler
saerdnaer (2023-08-16 02:11:41+00:00): Schau doch bitte erst mal von wem du grade Edits einfach so revertet und was es damit auf sich hat, Danke!
streckenkundler (2023-08-16 14:47:03+00:00): Hei,

wie du unschwer festgestellt haben dürftest, habe ich da bisher nichts revertet oder entfernt. 

Wie du auch festgestellt haben dürftest, war ich nicht der einzige, der kommentiert hat, vgl. das zweite CS: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139834325#map=19/53.03161/13.30522&layers=N

Meine Fairness gebot es mir, daß du es selbst zeitnah bereinigst.

Den Hintergrund deiner CS kenne ich nicht, mit dem CS-Kommentar "Camp23: Temp" schloß ich, daß es was temporäres sein muß, daher mein Verweis auf UMap. Das wäre dahingehend anscheinend wirklich die bessere Wahl, da man da mehr und bessere Gestaltungsmöglichkeiten hast.

Im übrigen beschuldigst du hier den Falschen: vgl. z.B. CS https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139891319 und weitere CS.

streckenkundler
streckenkundler (2023-09-10 16:24:12+00:00): ...Schade, daß keine Entschuldigung kam... Ich habe dir aufgezeigt, daß ich da nichts gelöscht habe... das war ein anderer... Siehe auch Forum: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/cccamp-2023-vorletzter-tag/102627

Ich werde gleich nach langer zeit mal in dem Bereich editieren und einen falschen Namen entsorgen...
Jrachi (2025-01-19 14:52:30+00:00): Ciao.
È interessante la storia dei tag su questa relazione.
Ma se non ha un ref; non sono presenti cartelli o altro con questo numero; non ha un operator.
Cosa rimane per mantenere una relazione?
Io lo cancellerei lasciando una nota sulla way.

Ivo
micheleOSM3 (2025-01-19 15:46:36+00:00): Il punto è proprio questo "se non sono presenti cartelli o altro con questo numero".
Non ho percorso il sentiero e quindi non lo so, ma ho percorso altri sentieri in disuso, anche molto vecchi, dove i segnavia e i numeri si vedevano benissimo, pertanto lascio a chi lo percorrerà in futuro la facoltà di decidere se eliminarlo o meno.
Jrachi (2025-01-19 20:14:28+00:00): Hai frainteso!
Non suggerivo di cancellare la way, che presumo esiste.
Ma di cancellare la relazione che manca dei presupposti per esistere.
Non è una segnaletica orizzontale che faccia la relazione, ma l'avere qualche elemento che ne giustifichino l'esistenza.
Non ha un ref, non ha un operator, non fa parte di qualche rete, non esiste.
micheleOSM3 (2025-01-20 08:01:50+00:00): Secondo me la modifica che proponi non è molto utile, ma se vuoi farla tu, fai pure.
TheNet1996 (2025-03-21 07:05:56+00:00): Hallo,
eine Frage zu deinem Eintrag:
Was bedeutet der name=Fest?
Viele Grüße
Mike
FroschForscher (2025-03-21 16:44:06+00:00): Dem Changeset Kommentar nach zu Urteilen war das nur ein Test und Fest=Test?
LeifRasmussen (2023-08-15 17:17:53+00:00): Any reason to use turn restrictions instead of making the road a one-way?
yallasan (2023-08-17 17:13:35+00:00): Hi,
Thank you for reviewing my changeset and providing the feedback. 
I have added turn restrictions based on Do Not Enter board at the location (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11113694515). Since, we do not find enough supporting evidence for the presence of directions at the other entrance(https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6308509707) such as sign board or lane markings. However, as per your recommendation I have deleted the turn restrictions and added directions in the changeset (140023372) which would better support the ground reality. Thank you for your inputs and the support.

Regards
yallasan
Jakka (2023-08-15 09:55:57+00:00): all those translations are not useful ;) are the same as name tag it self ;)
name:de 	Mama Thaï
name:en 	Mama Thaï
name:fr 	Mama Thaï