piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
sahilister (2023-10-23 07:00:08+00:00): Hi Akshat, great to see you mapping details in various areas. Just wanted to request addition of proper changeset comments as it helps identify/fix what is changed. 

You can read more at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
AkshatPal (2023-10-23 14:14:21+00:00): ok
☆Finvenkulo (2023-10-23 13:39:46+00:00): Używanie klucza wikipedia= wg wiki: / Using of key wikipedia= according to wiki:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:wikipedia
„…który powinien być napisany w języku ojczystym tagowanego obiektu…”

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikipedia
"…which should be to the article in the primary (local) language for the subject.…"
evo_evz (2023-12-16 14:31:35+00:00): Did you see this note?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3991730
woodpeck_repair (2023-11-06 23:38:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 143713695 where the changeset comment is: revert von edits eines benutzers nach selbstlöschung
user_16642036 (2023-10-23 12:19:09+00:00): Here again, why do you delete or change the names without moving them to old_name:*?
KasperSFranz (2023-10-23 09:21:33+00:00): Hi, would it not still be beneficial to have the seamark:types you have removed from these ways?
Flamen_Sru (2023-10-23 12:40:23+00:00): Hi  KasperSFranz, I have restored the data and removed only bridge tag. Thank you for feedback. Happy Mapping!
KasperSFranz (2023-10-23 12:46:25+00:00): Thank you😁
user_16642036 (2023-10-23 12:18:08+00:00): Why do you delete the street names without explanation? If they are no longer up-to-date, please move these to old_name:* instead of deleting them.
literan (2023-10-23 20:53:29+00:00): неверный формат адреса.

Ответьте
fx99 (2025-01-29 08:31:27+00:00): Hallo,
mit diesem CS hast Du die Wege 
33236992,1203983776,33236990,28986222 kaputt gemacht (Punkte verschoben), was Wegleuchte auffiel. Ich habe den CS revertiert, aber die Sperrung der B464 aufgehoben.
user_16642036 (2023-10-23 12:16:53+00:00): Why do you delete the Armenian names without explanation?
edvac (2023-10-23 18:03:31+00:00): Dear *Frank212,

Please answer the questions from Kadubei, before you continue mapping.

Deleting names is not generally acceptable, because we lose information.

We have a good naming system to accommodate names in different languages. For instance, for this area, we have the name:hy for Armenian language and name:az for Azeri language.

This area is under closed surveillance due to the recent events in Nagorno-Karabakh and some vandalism by different users.

Best regards,

Rafael Avila Coya, on behalf of the OpenStreetMap Foundation, Data Working Group.
user_16642036 (2023-10-23 12:19:47+00:00): Here is also a name removed without explanation.
DeKaN (2023-10-23 09:51:50+00:00): Не нужно указывать город, номер дома пишется без "д."
Taya_S (2023-10-23 07:43:59+00:00): A lot of vandalism happened. Someone tried deleting all of Isreal and made a huge mess in the process. Dragging all sorts of things around.
the DWG is currently in the process of restoring things.

Some info on what happened here:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/vandalism-and-blocks-in-israel/105176
and here: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/how-about-limit-new-accounts/101656/241
happilymappingrway (2023-10-23 15:12:31+00:00): The vandalism in this area is much too large for me to fix. I will stop my revert edits here and leave this for expert OSM mappers to fix. I apologize if I made things worse.
impiaaa (2023-10-23 16:01:01+00:00): I don't think it really makes sense for a room to be outside of a building. What are you trying to describe?
Archi_Ma (2023-10-26 14:52:01+00:00): Hi impiaaa,
Thank you for your feedback, this is aeroway jet bridge so adding building=bridge is not suggested tag as per wiki guidelines (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dbridge), hence removed the tag and added indoor=room as this polygon has been drawn for internal purpose.
impiaaa (2023-10-26 20:20:55+00:00): indoor=room is not allowed outside of a building outline.
impiaaa (2023-10-27 01:34:05+00:00): Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143180287
Archi_Ma (2023-10-27 14:15:28+00:00): Thank for feedback and I will review all changesets done for this activity.
pluton_od (2024-07-08 09:33:36+00:00): Відновив старі імена у зміні 153694471.
literan (2023-10-23 20:59:01+00:00): неверный формат адреса. Откат
ivanbranco (2024-05-13 17:14:38+00:00): Hi Lepuse,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11282877138

is start_date=900 correct or was it supposed to be =1900?

thanks and good mapping
Lepuse (2024-05-13 17:34:36+00:00): Yes, this is a ginkgo tree about 1100 years old, but thanks for the reminder because it should be written as start_date=0900 according to ISO 8601.
jmarchon (2023-10-25 03:57:08+00:00): Hello!
May I ask why you deleted this bridge?
Archi_Ma (2023-10-26 14:53:27+00:00): Hi jmarchon, Thank you for your feedback, this place has been permanently closed hence I have removed the polygon. I will revert the changes and keep man_made=bridge instead of building=bridge as per wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building=bridge
jmarchon (2023-10-28 18:56:10+00:00): Hello!
Any updates on this? It appears the bridge is still deleted.
Archi_Ma (2023-10-31 08:33:45+00:00): Hi jmarchon, Data has been fixed, Thank you!
andrewsuzuki (2023-10-23 21:17:10+00:00): Why are you removing building=bridge? This is a wooden covered bridge (with walls).
Tabzi (2023-10-26 14:48:50+00:00): Hi andrewsuzuki,
Thank you for your feedback, as per wiki guidelines (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dbridge) this structure should be tagged as  man_made=bridge instead of building=bridge hence I removed the additional tags.
Archi_Ma (2023-10-26 14:49:04+00:00): Hi andrewsuzuki,

Thank you for your feedback, as per wiki guidelines (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dbridge) this structure should be tagged as  man_made=bridge instead of building=bridge hence I removed the additional tags.
andrewsuzuki (2023-10-26 15:00:47+00:00): I think you're misunderstanding the wiki page. The text is: "Do not use this tag *just* for marking bridges", as in, don't use it for normal bridges that don't have a roof and walls. The tag is still valid for bridges that are both bridges *and* buildings, as it is in this case and all the others you deleted. Otherwise the tag would have been deprecated on the wiki.
Archi_Ma (2023-10-27 14:12:03+00:00): Thank for feedback and I will review all change sets done for this activity.
noelbov (2023-10-23 16:18:27+00:00): Beste SisV
Ik neem aan dat de bordjes tussen fietsknooppunt 20 en 21 dan ook zijn gewijzigd. Momenteel is die fietsroute-relatie 20 -> 21 onderbroken door uw aanpassingen. Zie https://www.knooppuntnet.nl/en/analysis/route/1540100 
Kan je dit zelf aanpassen of laten weten hoe het traject nu verloopt?
Met dank
noelbov
SisV (2023-10-24 11:40:24+00:00): Ik ben dit net gaan nakijken.
De fietsknooppunten zijn aangepast en de route loopt in beide richtingen via de Nieuwstraat.
Op de website www.knooppuntnet.nl kan ik dat niet zelf wijzigen.
noelbov (2023-10-24 21:08:17+00:00): Dank u wel voor uw reactie. 
Om de aanpassing te doen ben ik wel niet zeker van het laatste deel van het traject dat ik naar jouw uitleg hierna schets: 
om van 20 naar 21 te fietsen is het dus aan het einde van de Kloosterstraat naar links, dan eerste straat naar rechts tot einde Nieuwstraat, dan naar links en terug eerste straat rechts tot einde Korenmarkt, dan naar rechts over de Centrumbrug(?) maar de Wolvestraat is enkelrichting, dus daar mag je niet in ...
Wil je mij verbeteren waar fout of onvolledig?
Met nogmaals dank
noelbov
SisV (2023-10-25 06:19:34+00:00): De Wolvestraat is toegelaten voor fietsers in beide richtingen en daar rij je onder de Centrumbrug (die momenteel alleen voor fietsers te gebruiken is).
Hopelijk is dit een beetje duidelijker nu.
groeten
Siska
noelbov (2023-10-25 10:43:50+00:00): Dank u, ik heb de aanpassingen volgens uw instructies doorgevoerd.
vr.groeten
Noël
Renato Lapio (2023-10-30 11:24:46+00:00): aerial are old amd the intersection is totally different due to recent roadworks
I had implemented it in the last weeks but now I see my changes have been destroyed...
Marcello Rossi (2023-10-30 11:40:02+00:00): Oh sorry. I saw also Google Maps shared a similar aerial and I thought it could be a coincidence. Sorry about that.
gscholz (2023-10-27 07:03:09+00:00): Hi Tharushika ,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=80.57935&lat=7.69221&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=143002842

Especially way 384813994 is affected here:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/384813994

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2023-10-28 06:14:41+00:00): Hi Tharushika,
this error still exits, can I get your feedback here?
Guido
gscholz (2023-11-03 07:25:38+00:00): Hi Tharushika, 
due to your missing feedback I have reverted this changeset to fix those issues.
Guido
zstadler (2023-10-28 18:41:42+00:00): Hello sefabaris,

Please do not continue this!

The OSM volunteer team has enough on their hands. These kind of acts do not increase the popularity of the Palestinians.

You probably understand that such damage will not remain on the map, so what's the point?
SomeoneElse (2023-10-29 10:47:01+00:00): Hello sefabaris,
I've reverted this node name change in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143305909 .  Whilst there's certainly a discussion to be had about names here (the DWG has been involved in discussions of the name of Jerusalem in the past) and undicussed change is not the way to achieve this.
Please discuss contentious changes at https://community.openstreetmap.org before making them.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of the data working group.
amadvance (2023-10-24 15:12:31+00:00): Ciao Giorgio83

Per favore non aggiungere il numero di sentiero nel campo "name". Tale informazione va messa solo nel campo "ref".

Vedi le indicazioni nella pagina: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:CAI

Ho già sistemato io.

Ciao,
Andrea
Giogio83 (2023-10-24 18:27:53+00:00): ciao andrea
il problema è che il validatore OSMOSE  segnala l'errore che manca il campo name visto che c'è il campo ref, puoi controllare qui gli errori di mapping qui https://www.hdyc.neis-one.org/
Per le prossime volte si può mettere il nome proprio del sentiero se c'è oppure a mio avviso sentiero DA .... A.... che ne pensi (grazie per il link alla documentazione CAI), che ne pensi?
amadvance (2023-10-24 19:42:34+00:00): Ciao Giogio83,

Intendi questo sito osmose.openstreetmap.fr ?

Non trovo la regola che dici, come si chiama esattamente ?

Comunque, quello che fa testo è la pagina ufficiale della documentazione. Il nome si mette solo se esiste. Non se ne devono inventare. Tra l'altro i campi "from" e "to" già ci sono, e i vari siti sono già in grado di estrarre queste informazioni.

Vedi ad esempio: https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=12215087

Ciao,
Andrea
Giogio83 (2023-10-24 20:29:30+00:00): si www.hdyc.neis-one.org prende i dati da qui osmose.openstreetmap.fr, io lo uso per verificare se non ci sono stati errori durante la mappatura .
L'errore se non mi ricordo male era "alternative name without name" Ora ho cercato un po in giro ho visto che già qualcun'altro si è lamentato di questo problema https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/22512

quindi non correggerò piu tali errori, grazie per la segnalazione.
silversurfer83 (2023-10-23 09:53:09+00:00): Moin henner,

sieht auf den ersten Blick so aus, als wäre das in diesem Fall so in Ordnung :)

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143004175
lukasbrunner (2026-06-30 14:03:50+00:00): Buongiorno. Ho visto che con questo changeset hai rimosso il tag "bicycle=yes" da Via Garibaldi a Torino. A mia conoscenza, non c'è un divieto esplicito di transito ai velocipedi in via Garibaldi, e in assenza di un divieto esplicito il transito è consentito (art. 3 Codice della Strada), e come indicato dal Wiki di OpenStreetMap (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpedestrian#Italy) il tag "bicycle=yes" dovrebbe essere riportato.
C'è un motivo particolare per cui hai rimosso questo tag? Es. un divieto esplicito che non ho ancora avuto tempo di verificare? (Onestamente non vado in via Garibaldi da qualche anno.)
Grazie e buona giornata!
Jrachi (2026-06-30 17:16:39+00:00): E chi si ricorda cosa feci due anni fa!
E dalla mia modifica sono passate 8 modifiche.
Si, sarebbe meglio chiarire con un survey pedonale.

Ivo
lukasbrunner (2026-07-01 05:31:07+00:00): Grazie della pronta risposta.
Ho giusto fatto un sopralluogo ieri, non ho visto divieti specifici, e ho visto parecchi velocipedi circolare. Procederò quindi a reintrodurre il tag.
Grazie ancora e buona giornata!
122131 (2023-10-24 18:09:05+00:00): Ciao! Dal momento che c è un nodo dedicato alla pensilina, non pensi sia ridondante taggare anche il marciapiede come fermata?
122131 (2023-10-24 18:08:16+00:00): La posizione precedente è più accurata. (Source: survey)
bxl-forever (2023-10-26 15:11:58+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue.

Merci pour votre contribution.
Attention, OpenStreetMap est une carte utilisée par de nombreuses personnes, il faut toujours mettre du  soin à y insérer des données correctes.

Nous avons changé votre contribution parce qu'il y avait deux problèmes majeurs.

1) Vous avez mis qu'elle était à sens unique pour tout le monde.  Ce n’est pas exact, il y a des panneaux « excepté vélo » et ceci fait aussi partie de la donnée de la carte. Si on oublie cela, le routing vélo est cassé et ça donne des suggestions d’itinéraire pas correctes.

2) Vous avez mis toute la rue à sens unique.  Ce n’est pas exact, la partie avec le tram est encore à double sens pour tout le trafic.  Comme la rue était dessinée en un seul morceau, la solution est de la couper en deux au point de la jonction de Rue de Lombardie et uniquement mettre une partie à sens unique, pas toute la rue.

Nous comprenons que c'est difficile à faire quand on débute.  Vos contributions sont bienvenues, et si vous sentez que la technique est difficile, alors peut-être de préférence ajouter une note sur la carte en décrivant ce qu'il faut changer, et nous serons heureux de le faire et d’expliquer.

Nous avons tout corrigé ici, ne plus faire svp.

Happy mapping!
Dianapvlv (2023-10-23 08:34:17+00:00): Room with coffee
Fizzie-DWG (2023-11-13 02:41:42+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143953793
Makifr (2023-10-23 08:40:35+00:00): Niech ktoś doda tag niedawno zniszczony budynek do budynku nr 13
map per (2023-10-23 10:31:01+00:00): Wegen review_requested:
Die Änderung sieht gut aus, danke!
eggie (2023-10-23 16:31:02+00:00): Dag Nikkle  Stopt het pad daadwerkelijk voorbij het bruggetje of is dat er wellicht ook niet meer?

MVG
eggie
nevw (2023-10-25 03:39:31+00:00): Hi, osmi spotted an error here https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=151.96667&lat=-27.45076&zoom=17
nevw (2023-10-26 04:46:40+00:00): I fixed this in this changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143142930
I made the both the landuse=construction and the developed residential area into multipolygons and shared the same way between the two areas in the relations.
I also took Sandy Brennan Park inner out of the developed area relation as I think it should be considered part of the residential area useage.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-11-13 02:40:46+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143953780
Fizzie-DWG (2023-11-13 02:39:10+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143953757
bxl-forever (2023-10-23 12:15:11+00:00): Thanks for this and good luck with the new shop.

Since the place will only open in two months, I set the opening hours to off, to avoid misleading people into thinking they can find an open Kruidvat here.  I put a reminder to myself to update that in the week before the opening.

A few months ago I enquired if you still need to repeat the addresses of your shops on their nodes.  We are in the process of eliminating duplicate addresses on many places all over Brussels, and Kruidvat+ICI PARIS XL shops are an unfotunate exception.
Did you make any progress in the way you use OSM so that we can finally remove addr:* tags from them?

Thanks in advance.
borishag (2023-10-23 12:33:19+00:00): The opening hours string is used by several applications that use OSM data. When you remove this string potential visitors will be sent to a closed shop. That's why we inform in the opening hours string the opening date of the shop when applicable

All AS Watson Benelux shops (ca 1.800) use the same format. If you decide to change the format, please do so for all commercial 37.641 BE retail shops.
balint36 (2023-10-30 20:19:17+00:00): A kis kunkori, amit te hozzáadtál a 2-es főúthoz, az nem része a 2-es főútnak. Forrás: KIRA
urbalazs (2023-10-31 10:44:16+00:00): Nehéz ám mindenkinek megfelelni. Itt megint egy validátor miatt adtam hozzá, és a valóság is ezt az utat követi, ha arra autózol. Én ezt nem tartom hibának, ha a praktikusság miatt egy kicsit eltérünk a hivatalos ábrázolástól, hiszen az OSM nem szeretne KIRA2 lenni. Ugyanakkor a felhasználónak (például nekem) az segítség, ha meg tudom nézni egy utazás előtt, hogy merre megy az az út, amelyiket követnem kell. Ha nem okoz egyébként gondot ez a kis hurok, akkor szerintem maradjon. Mit gondolsz?
balint36 (2023-10-31 14:12:23+00:00): Abból kiindulva, hogy azt térképezünk, amit látunk. Nem.
Mivel gyakran járok erre, teljes biztossággal elmondhatom, hogy nincs kitáblázva, hogy a hurok a 2-es főút része. Sőt, én csak M2-t láttam.
Az oldalt látható kis zöld szelvénytáblák is lefelé vezetik a 2-es szelvényezését, fent teljesen más van, ami azt jelenti, hogy az máshoz tartozik.
Nem látom, hogy utazásban mit segít az, hogy kapcsolatot viszünk arra, mert a megfelelően címkézett vonalak (way) feladata lenne. Csupán azért szeretnéd, hogy bármilyen OSM-lekérdezés során láthass egy utat, akkor az egy rossz hozzáállás, mert nem a megjelenítés lenne fontos, hanem a helyes információátadás.
joost schouppe (2023-10-23 10:04:38+00:00): Maybe that's what I used to be, but to me it looks like foot=yes:
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=50.7724053&lng=4.4130161&z=17&pKey=1225754134768312&focus=photo&x=0.5645587077900337&y=0.6232299575802618&zoom=2.1430716595929575
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=50.77045709999999&lng=4.417626100000007&z=19.9&pKey=264008559875940&focus=photo&x=0.07243503641907706&y=0.5475492620871864&zoom=2.153526970954357
Bear-in-a-box (2023-10-23 10:31:43+00:00): very strange, indeed, because on the southern end it is signed as "no access": https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=519001276497635
joost schouppe (2023-10-23 14:46:02+00:00): My second link is on the south end. That image is more recent than the one you linked. Though on your image I don't see the pedestrians being struck out either...
Bear-in-a-box (2023-10-23 15:30:19+00:00): Thanks for checking in detail..seems legit. Probably changed..
joost schouppe (2023-10-23 17:50:43+00:00): OK, I've returned the access for pedestrians
Bear-in-a-box (2023-10-24 07:45:18+00:00): Thanks you. I just changed from "designated" to "yes". Otherwise it appears in blue and looks like a designated cyclepath.
Branko Kokanovic (2023-10-29 20:49:18+00:00): Zdravo, pazi molim te da ne diras admin boundarije. Trudimo se da ih drzimo prema RGZ-u i otvorenim podacima i imamo skriptu koja prijavljuje greske, pa onda vidimo ovakve stvari:) Vise detalja ima na forumu: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/rgz-otvorio-registar-prostornih-jedinica-plan-za-import/88863 i na wikiju: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Serbia/RGZ_Import
openstreetmapFelix (2023-10-29 22:08:20+00:00): Cao, naravno, nisam znao... Jos mi je delovalo cudno sto stoje ovako nasred trotoara i cak preko dela zgrade.
Vidim da si vec vratio 👍
Hvala na ispravci 👋
Branko Kokanovic (2023-10-30 08:31:20+00:00): Ma da, imali smo rasprave da li da "lepimo" granice na ulice/reke, da li da budu paralelno, da li je normalno da idu preko kuća i sl., ali na kraju je dogovor bio da je to "zvanična" informacija i da nema smisla da mi to pomeramo sad (ma koliko čudno delovalo ili ma koliko se offseti satelita iz RGZ-a i drugih provajdera ne slažu). I sad (kad već ne diramo) tačno znamo kad neko pomeri granicu ili grad ili, kao ti sad Rakovicu:) Nema na čemu, samo ti rokaj!:) Tu smo na forumu ili na telegram kanalu https://t.me/osm_sr
openstreetmapFelix (2023-10-30 11:53:49+00:00): Sve razumem. 
Planiram kad budem stigao da se aktiviram na forumu i telegramu. Vidimo se tamo
aTarom (2023-10-23 14:00:08+00:00): Hola MateoGR, gracias por editar, entiendo perfectamente la situación, se retiran los nombres descriptivos de las vías
Camino Privado Cerrado    https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/917536514/history
Camino sin salida privado    https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/977594908/history
Camino de titularidad privada    https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/286430006/history
Camino privado de la finca    https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/917536519/history
Camino Privado Cerrado    https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1020768064/history
Camino privado de la finca    https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/138592589/history
añadido si no lo tenía el "access"="private"
es la única manera para que las aplicaciones de navegación lo tengan en cuenta, no entienden el name pero si pueden interpretar perfectamente la etiqueta "access"
Saludos
Frans S (2023-10-23 10:18:01+00:00): Hello . Thanks for mapping.
Please check your knowledge about tagging highways.
A road, connecting settlements, is never a track.  Select unclassified, residential, (Main connecting: Tertiary)
Best regards and keep mapping
Karl Addison (2025-08-16 11:43:09+00:00): CLOSED DUE TO HS2
opendcc (2023-10-23 16:36:53+00:00): reverted? deleted building and opening hours ...
Jan Olieslagers (2023-10-23 16:49:14+00:00): The restaurant I put back like it was - the mapping was perfect as it was, I am quite annoys that anyone wanted to fuss around. I must admit the opening hours got lost somewhere in the action, and I cannot find them back. Shame on me!