piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
jpennycook (2023-03-01 09:38:25+00:00): Hi!

In this changeset, Rookes Way was set to access=permit - this is used where a permit is easy to apply for and is usually granted, but your comment was "No public access" suggesting that such a permit would be hard to obtain.  Secondly, this section of road already has vehicle=no set, which would override the access=permit for vehicles (bicycles, cars, taxis, etc., but not buses due to the bus=yes tag), so this only leaves pedestrians as needing a permit to walk along here.  I've set it back to bus=yes, emergency=yes, and vehicle=no - bus and emergency override the vehicle tag as they're more specific.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/475685460/history 

You might find the following useful:-
* https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access=permit?uselang=en-GB ("This tag should be used in cases where a permit is required, but is routinely granted to everyone requesting it")
* https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#United_Kingdom
* https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access#Land-based_transportation
* https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access#Land-based_transportation https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access#List_of_possible_values

Jon
Jordi MF (2023-03-05 17:14:24+00:00): Hola,
Esta zona que has mapejat com a parc no se la pot considerar així perquè no hi ha camps d'oci, com jocs infantils, camps d'esport, zones de descans o de pícnic. A més, el nom que li has afegit "Ermita de Sant Antoni" és innecessari perquè l'ermita ja està mapejada amb el seu edifici. Per tant, ja que estic editant la zona, aprofite per a eliminar-lo.
Salutacions,
Jordi
mavl (2023-04-25 09:07:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
ivanbranco (2023-03-05 23:00:10+00:00): Ciao EleBerna,

Luoghi di interesse=Palazzo Vitelleschi

non è un tag valido. Un possibile tagging potrebbe essere stato
building=yes 
name=Palazzo Vitelleschi

in ogni caso questi era già mappato: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1086026803
bxl-forever (2023-03-01 09:32:35+00:00): Hello,

Please inspect the list of tags here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6716272356/history

You will find that the website and phone number were already in the database.

I think the problem comes from the iD editor you are using.  If you only look at the presets (upper part of the screen) it will hide some information from you and fool you into believing data is "missing".

If you want to use iD, it is always better to type the tags directly in the tag list, at the bottom of the window.

Hope that helps.
cimm (2023-03-01 09:36:46+00:00): You are right, I didn't notice the duplicated tags below. I reverted my changeset #133163865. Thanks for the alert!
Jordi MF (2023-03-05 16:51:39+00:00): Hola dporcar37,
En primer lloc, gràcies per millorar les dades d'OpenStreetMap. He vist que estàs millorant algunes zones de Borriol, però, en alguns casos, estàs utilitzant l'etiqueta leisure=park de manera massa general. Tingues en compte que, en OSM, el concepte "parc" ha d'entendre's com una zona de gran extensió on es poden realitzar diverses activitats d'oci (esport, jocs infantils, zones verdes on descansar...) i en un lloc amb una vegetació semisalvatge. En este cas, el xicotet banc que hi ha en el carrer de Sant Antoni a baix d'una olivera no pot considerar-se un parc (a l'igual que la zona recreativa de la Font de Codina no és un parc. Si de cas, una zona de pícnic).

Corregiré esta zona i afegiré el banc i l'arbre.
Salutacions,
Jordi
Jordi MF (2023-03-05 16:52:06+00:00): Per cert, si tens més dubtes, et recomane entrar en el grup de Telegram d'usuaris valencians d'OSM
Jordi MF (2023-03-05 16:54:02+00:00): Se m'obildava, un "parc" segons la wiki d'OpenStreetMap és el següent:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark
tux67 (2023-03-01 14:20:26+00:00): Why needs a way with a fence to be closed?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133163003
Oriol Raventós (2023-03-02 09:56:34+00:00): In this particular case, it had the tag "area = yes", which is always the case for power substations. Hence, to create a valid entry without warnings one had to close the way. Also it happened that the beginning and the end of the way were under 1 meter appart, so it looked almost like a typo that it was not closed to start with.
Supaplex (2023-03-01 10:34:50+00:00): 中山堂有住人?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133163029
twF6wdEYwL (2023-03-01 11:19:26+00:00): 謝謝，已修正
Waaslander (2023-03-01 09:16:38+00:00): *Sint-Gillis-Waas
mavl (2023-04-25 09:10:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:10:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
Fizzie-DWG (2024-01-07 05:25:22+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145978840
map per (2023-03-01 17:17:57+00:00): Hello mrahulw,

I rewiewed your changeset:
I think changing this road (1) to a oneway road is a be better solution than using turn restrictions.

Best regards
map per

(1) https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/640180570
mrahulw (2023-03-03 09:00:04+00:00): Hello,

Thank you for reviewing my changeset and highlighting the issue. Apologies for the incorrect edits. We have added directions in the changeset #133198198.Thanks once again for the feedback provided, I'm looking forward to learn more from you.

Regards,
map per (2023-03-03 18:23:08+00:00): Thanks, deleted the superfluous turn restrictions as well in CS 133265269
mavl (2023-04-25 09:09:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
Hufkratzer (2023-03-01 23:17:31+00:00): Hi,
You have removed building=yes from
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/107475971,
therefore it is no longer rendered as a building.

Same problem here;
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/149527725

Compare:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:building=riding_hall
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:leisure=horse_riding
Lokai (2023-03-01 20:24:37+00:00): Hallo,

du hast im Neubaugebiet neue Straßen kartiert. Dort waren vorher Sportplätze. Auf welcher Grundlage hast du die Geometrie?
Wie weit sind die Straßen gabaut? Ich könnte mir durchaus living_street dort vorstellen. Ist dem so?

Gruß

L.
matteo2323 (2023-03-03 06:15:13+00:00): Guten Morgen, 
um alles zu erklären, benötige ich 2-3 Sätze Anlauf.
Zu deiner ersten Frage: Ich habe die Daten aufgrund meines Berufs direkt von der Stadtplanung Neustadt erhalten.
Blaulichtorganisationen (BOS) in RLP setzen zunehmen auf die Karten von OSM. 
In diesem Zug benötigen diese Organisationen bereits bei Neubaubeginn Kartenwerke um Einsatzmittel disponieren zu können. 
Aktuell ist die Straße noch nicht befahrbar und im Bau. Dauert aktuell noch 3-4 Monate.

Wie ist das Vorgehen für solche Updates? "Ortsstraße" ist ja noch übertrieben. Sollte man das als Feldweg "taggen"? Ich habe hierzu nichts in der Community gefunden.

Wichtig für BOS ist, dass der Straßenname in OSM suchbar wird und ein Routing dorthin unterstützt wird.
Shaun das Schaf (2023-03-04 09:49:41+00:00): Hallo, eine Ortsstraße die sich noch im Bau befindet bekommt im Normalfall die Tags "highway=construction" und "construction=residential".

Mehr Informationen dazu hier:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:construction#Beispielwerte_f%C3%BCr_im_Bau_befindliche_Stra%C3%9Fen

Viele Grüße
Shaun das Schaf
alxm (2023-03-01 09:50:56+00:00): There no such military area.
Apparently, this was added for routers, to produce warnings.
This is superfluous, since checkpoint itself is enough.
luiswoo (2023-03-01 10:39:46+00:00): Хороший, смотрю план, забористый... Канатная дорога вместо забора, удаление землепользования...
В вики https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%97%D0%B0%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%8F_%D1%81%D1%82%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%86%D0%B0 вообще не было желания заглянуть?
ivanbranco (2023-03-05 23:02:11+00:00): Ciao Mub, 

ho visto che hai richiesto la revisione della modifica. Mi sembra sia tutto a posto :)

speriamo di rivederti con nuove modifiche in futuro, grazie per l'edit e buon mapping!
GinaroZ (2023-03-01 22:32:26+00:00): The cycleway connects to a footway in OSM which will likely prevent routing between the two roads - how does it connect to the road on the ground?
FrenchyF (2023-03-02 09:20:56+00:00): Unfortunately at the moment this is how it connects to the footway. That might change though - the work doesn't seem to be quite finished.
Syl (2023-04-19 12:44:02+00:00): Bonjour, je n'arrive pas à trouver de source pour confirmer le changement de nom de ce bout de rue. Quelle source avez-vous utilisé ?
Hopla57 (2023-08-28 22:25:32+00:00): Hello,
Sûrement Google, mais c'est faux. J'ai rétabli.
À+
Sotavento (2023-03-04 18:02:59+00:00): Was bedeuted "Name is the name only!"
MarcoR (2023-03-01 13:29:00+00:00): Queste stazioni di ricarica cosa possono ricaricare? Che tipo di prese hanno? Sono fruibili da chiunque o bisogna avere una tessera o un'app?

Se non è possibile ricaricare le auto e le biciclette sarebbe importante aggiungere i tag motorcar=no e bicycle=no. Vedi https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station e https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Ddevice_charging_station

Buon mapping,
Marco.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133165351
ivanbranco (2023-03-05 23:14:01+00:00): Ciao Andrea, benvenut su OSM

ho notato dei problemi:
1. hai taggato un nodo come "power=Sede G.A.I.A. (Galleria d'Arte Indipendente Autogestita);local knowledge;Sede G.A.I.A."
questo non ha molto senso. power=* è utilizzato per elementi inerenti l'energia elettrica, e una galleria d'arte non mi sembra inerente.

2. L'allineamento del ponte dei pignatari (così come di tutto il resto) mi sembrava piu' corretto prima, in base a cosa hai deciso che le foto aeree di Bing fossero meglio allineate?
Andrea_SPA (2023-03-06 08:09:31+00:00): 1. Non ho trovato una icona attinente ed ho assegnato l’elemento in modo casuale.

2. Dalla sovrapposizione della mappatura satellitare e di quella di base confini e strade risultavano non coincidenti e di alcuni edifici anche del tutto sbagliate. Per questo ho provveduto a correggere partendo arbitrariamente da una zona che conosco di più.
ivanbranco (2023-03-06 10:54:31+00:00): Per conoscere i tag da utilizzare puoi consultare la wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page

Non aggiungere cose "in modo casuale" se non trovi il tag corretto, piuttosto lascia una nota e ci penserà qualcun altro a farlo.

Ci sono diverse immagini satellitari selezionabili, quella che hai usato tu (Bing) non è ben allineata. Per utilizzarla bisogna prima allinearla: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Using_aerial_imagery

in alternativa se sei alle prime armi puoi concentrarti su modifiche piu' semplici come nodi, aggiunte di negozi, modifiche di dati già esistenti ecc.

buon mapping
map per (2023-03-01 16:55:46+00:00): Hello rekulc1,

this road (1) is overlapping with the secondary highway.

Best regards
map per

(1) https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1150401776
rekulc1 (2023-03-02 07:46:15+00:00): Hello map per,

Thank you for reviewing my changeset and flagging out the issue. I apologize for the incorrect edits. I've made the necessary changes in changeset 133199809. Thanks once again, looking forward to learn more from you. 

Regards,
rekulc1
RicoElectrico (2023-03-01 14:42:41+00:00): Cześć, czy możesz potwierdzić, że te obiekty tu się znajdują? Ja nic takiego nie znalazłem, wydaje mi się, że to prywatny dom.
whb (2023-03-01 21:28:34+00:00): Hier ist keine Einbahnstraße:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/306530537
Die Ein- und Ausfahrten wurden auch schon korrekt mit Abbiegebeschränkungen versehen.
F_Weinmann (2023-03-02 16:34:43+00:00): Guter Punkt, ist korrigiert, macht mit den Abbiegebeschränkungen mehr Sinn.
eggie (2023-03-01 11:28:29+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback De info heb ik samengevoegd met de adresnode.
Zouden de openingstijden wel kloppen.
Tu-Sa 10:00-18:00; Su 00:00-17:00; Mo 00:00-18:00

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
flohoff (2023-03-02 15:25:08+00:00): Moin,
die access tags sind ein bisschen kaputt - Wie ist das denn beschildert? Und ein generisches access=no um dann einziges zu erlauben ist unpassend.

Dazu kommt das ein path per definition keine zweispurigen fahrzeuge aufnehmen kann - ist per definition einspurig. Also sind dinge wie "motorcar=no" total über.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/224164203

Ich empfehle das hier mal anzusehen:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Germany

Selbst mofa musst du hier nicht verbieten weil kein bicycle=designated da drauf ist.

Ich denke alle access tags sind hier über.

Flo
gscholz (2023-03-03 07:54:46+00:00): Hi alisari55,
your recent activities have left behind a lot of errors in the OSM database regarding not connected ways (red dots):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=34.47837&lat=41.68885&zoom=10&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1

As you may know, those ways are not usable by routing software. Can you please fix this?

Yo may also like to educate yourself about how to add changeset comments which give some information to other users about what you are doing:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Kind regards
Guido
literan (2023-03-01 22:18:54+00:00): контур моста зачем-то испортили - сузили и искривили. Откачу.
gscholz (2023-03-03 07:54:43+00:00): Hi alisari55,
your recent activities have left behind a lot of errors in the OSM database regarding not connected ways (red dots):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=34.47837&lat=41.68885&zoom=10&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1

As you may know, those ways are not usable by routing software. Can you please fix this?

Yo may also like to educate yourself about how to add changeset comments which give some information to other users about what you are doing:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Kind regards
Guido
ivanbranco (2023-03-05 23:16:15+00:00): Ciao tiltz,

grazie per l'aggiunta. Difficilmente l'elemento sarà però visibile perché non possiede un tag "principale" che descriva che cose è. Forse potrebbe essere qualcosa del tipo https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dsocial_facility ma non ne sono sicuro
literan (2023-03-01 22:17:36+00:00): нет рядом с этим местом никаких пешеходных переходов https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/475523905

удалю, не надо вносить выдуманные объекты.

Также, по макс. скорости - на обходе Лобни прямо стоят знаки "90"? не видел таких
user_12500175 (2023-03-01 19:34:43+00:00): Hallo koastoas,
was meinst Du, sollte man die Kaffebar als separaten Node mappen?

Gruß
Danfost
koastoas (2023-03-01 20:06:01+00:00): Hi Danfost,

das ist eine gute Frage. 
Auf der Tchibo Webseite ist es so wie hier eingetragen. Vielleicht mal die anderen Tchibo Eintragungen auf OSM überprüfen
Yakari (kleiner Indianer) (2023-03-02 05:32:40+00:00): Zrovna tady jsem to chtěl udělat.
luiswoo (2023-03-01 11:52:58+00:00): Ну ок, буду твоё серево откатывать по дефолту.
Note_Fixer (2023-03-01 11:28:48+00:00): estes, tollway, on or off
Note_Fixer (2023-03-01 13:09:57+00:00): poles moved back.
Note_Fixer (2023-03-01 13:11:01+00:00): land cleared.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-03-01 11:57:04+00:00): What is barrier=steps?
Scout Jens (2023-03-01 12:22:36+00:00): a barrier of steps - how can I map it better?
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-03-01 13:00:50+00:00): 1. these steps are not a barrier
2. there is no tagging established for mapping stairs in this manner, if you think these need to be mapped you can start a discussion on the wiki.
3. (My opinion) I don't think steps should be mapped except as part of the way when a way goes up or down the steps.
Scout Jens (2023-03-01 18:24:47+00:00): Thank you fpr your opinion. I will map it differently. The problem here is in my opinion, that the whole area is for pedestrians and the steps are not remarked. They are a barrier for wheelchair for example.
Greetings, Jens
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-03-01 19:48:33+00:00): I can see how the steps being visually mapped might help in that case but due to the complexity of implementing a solution and the limited application I doubt a solution will be implemented.
Scout Jens (2023-03-02 17:15:38+00:00): OK. I removed the tag barrier. May somone delete the lines or improve it. Thank you very much for the input. I like it when people criticize me in a positive way.
This area ist mapped very good anyway. 
There are still so many areas left where rudimentary things are missing. Today I was in Bietigheim-Bissingen. There are still missing connections and some details. And sorry for my "google-english" ;-)
map per (2023-03-01 16:50:19+00:00): Hello mrahulw,

please use good changeset comments (see (1)). The comment "Modified Geometry #amap" is rather misleading as you didn't change any geometry.

Thanks and best regards
map per

(1) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
saikkoru (2023-03-02 09:25:04+00:00):  Hello,
Thank you for reviewing my changeset and flagging out the issue. I apologize for the incorrect comment. Going forward, I'll ensure to not repeat such errors again and comment according to changes the made, looking forward to learn more from you.
Regards,
saikkoru
map per (2023-03-01 16:41:37+00:00): Hello mrahulw,

please use good changeset comments (see (1)). You used the "Modified Access tag.#amap" comment several times although no access tags were modified.

Thanks and best regards
map per

(1) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
mrahulw (2023-03-03 09:02:16+00:00): Hello,

Thank you for reviewing my changeset and flagging out the issue. I apologize for the incorrect comment. Going forward, I'll ensure to not repeat such errors again and comment according to changes the made, looking forward to learn more from you.

Regards,
mrahulw
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-03-01 11:52:44+00:00): what is mc?
changchun_1 (2023-03-01 12:15:02+00:00): ;-) ein Tippfehler, danke für die Info. Daten wurden lorrigiert.
Harfeur (2023-03-02 07:53:16+00:00): Salut ! Je pense qu'ici il faut cartographier le square avec "leisure=park". Mais sinon les chemins sont ok. Tu peux les faire se relier à l'intérieur pour faciliter le routage.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:place=square
vnourdin (2023-03-02 08:33:00+00:00): Pourtant c'est bien une place qui n'est pas fermée, j'ai du mal à voir dans quel cas le square n'est "pas forcément situé sur une place" ?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133168352
vasony (2023-03-02 17:10:58+00:00): Szia!

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/482656432

Ez biztos végig híd, és ilyen furcsa szögben létezik?
Valamint innen is hiányzik a közterület jelleg.

Tamás
PPici (2023-03-02 18:01:47+00:00): Szia!

Nem végig híd, csak elkeffentettem.
Csak a csatornán átvezető részen van híd.
Mint az előzőben írtam "Fekete Erdő út"

Köszi,

Laci
vasony (2023-03-02 17:07:29+00:00): Szia!

MI a közterület jellege az általad felvett utcáknak? (út, utca, köz, tér, stb.)

Varga László
Sipos Pál
Sirató-zug Belső

Az openstreetmapre a teljes utcanevet kell megadni.
Illetve mi a a forrása, mert azt nem adtad meg.

Köszi, Tamás
PPici (2023-03-02 17:58:15+00:00): Szia!

Sipos Pál út
Varga László út
Fekete Erdő út

Nem volt világos kell e vagy sem a jelleg.

A "Sirató-zug Belső" jó kérdés a többi elnevezési logika szerint ez is  út kéne hogy legyen, de az az igazság, hogy nincs hivatalos neve, csak egy jelző tábla a Körösladány felé vezető úton. 
A forrás a helyi utcanévtáblák illetve a nemzeti alaptérképen is így szerepelnek.
A Sipos Pál úton van több ingatlanom is ezért tudom.

Köszi,
Laci
Laci
vasony (2023-03-02 18:32:24+00:00): Köszönöm, Tamás
PPici (2023-03-02 18:45:39+00:00): Bocs a hülye kérdésért; próbálom javítani az utcaneveket a Google térképén is, pl a Fekete Erdő út esetében megjött a levél, hogy elfogadták publikálták -meg is jelent, de a Sipos Pál út esetében annak ellenére nem jelenik meg, hogy arról is megkaptam hogy publikálták.
Van ötleted arról, hogy mi lehet az oka?

Laci
vasony (2023-03-02 20:08:52+00:00): google ügyben sajnos nem tudok segíteni, teljesen fekete lyuk mit mikor hogyan csinálnak
PPici (2023-03-02 20:18:40+00:00): Köszi.
bkil (2023-03-02 22:06:05+00:00): Egy ismerős aki jelentett Google adathibát párszor, találkozott azzal, hogy sok esetben korlátlan ideig visszatartják a javítást indoklás nélkül. Talán néha Trap Street? Minden esetre a tanulság, hogy olyan térképet kell javítani ahol hálásak érte! ;-)
BCNorwich (2023-03-02 08:01:19+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The warnings above are because your new steps are not connected to the highway network. Thus they cannot be used to route from one place to another. Also a couple of times you placed steps beside a mapped footpath, the path should have the steps inserted. Otherwise, you have a highway atop a highway, confusing for routers. I've corrected these instances, please check them.

Regards Bernard.
george1201 (2023-10-06 22:40:47+00:00): Frage zum Ibis-Parkplatz https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/103780966 am Bahnhof.
Den hast du mit access=yes gemappt. An den Schranken für Ein- und Ausfahrt steht aber motor_vehicle=customers bzw. yes. Müsste nicht beides gleich sein? Und zwar (wenn jeder rein darf) motor_vehicle=yes.
Scout Jens (2023-10-09 06:36:50+00:00): ich habe Schranken, Wege und Parkplatz auf permissive gesetzt (Geduldete Zugangsberechtigung für die Öffentlichkeit durch den Eigentümer. Die Erlaubnis oder Duldung kann der Eigentümer jedoch jederzeit widerrufen.)
Und noch die Umgehng der Treppe vor dem Hotel eingetragen. Vielen Dank und Grüße, Jens
george1201 (2023-10-09 20:57:51+00:00): Danke, so gefällt es mir. Die Access-Eigenschaften auf dem Parkplatz sind jetzt konsistent.
Das mit der Treppe war mir gar nicht aufgefallen. Da wäre man also bisher gar nicht dran vorbeigekommen, ohne die Treppe rauf- und runterzulaufen. Jetzt passt es.
luiswoo (2023-03-01 14:09:59+00:00): откачено, приём
luiswoo (2023-03-01 14:11:50+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:aerialway%3Dzip_line не забор, приём
luiswoo (2023-03-01 14:16:15+00:00): План на сайте azimut 61 делал дегенерат, его нужно расшифровывать, приём.
tux67 (2023-03-01 14:26:38+00:00): Hi - mit den dubiosen Vorschlägen aus dem Namespace von iD wäre ich vorsichtig. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Name_Suggestion_Index
Lieber mal bei den Kollegen schauen die viele AVV Routen mappen wie aixbrick.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133171147
krb100 (2023-03-29 08:48:59+00:00): Hi, vielen Dank für den Hinweis. Hierbei ging es nur um Wikidata. Sonst wurde nichts geändert.