piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NorthCrab (2023-01-01 20:46:12+00:00): Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Jeśli dasz radę to proszę zastosuj któryś z tych formatów oznaczeń ścieżek pieszo rowerowych - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:segregated
Jest to dokładniejszy sposób mapowania od path, ale rozumiem że może być to trochę trudne na początek.

Jeśli nie dasz rady to daj mi znać który ze znaków tam się znajduje i to poprawię - https://i.imgur.com/IRKvFBS.png

Nie używaj oznaczenia crossing=zebra dla przejść na pieszych, zastosuj się do nowego formatu:
crossing=uncontrolled
crossing:markings=zebra
https://i.imgur.com/OkyNchY.png

Pozdrawiam!
Dawid2849 (2023-01-01 13:41:52+00:00): Podsanie* Zasanie jest po drugiej stronie Sanu xD
UserMicha (2023-08-21 17:42:41+00:00): Hallo majestixx-de, ich bin heute von OsmAnd da durch geroutet worden, obwohl es tagsüber verboten ist und das mittlerweile auch kontrolliert wird. Wir sollten das ändern, ich weiß nur nicht wie. Genügt es, die Barriere mit access=no @ ... zu taggen oder muss man den Weg damit kennzeichnen?
majestixx-de (2023-08-21 19:42:05+00:00): Hallo UserMicha,
das weiß ich ehrlich gesagt nicht. Ich habe nur Fragen mit der Street Complete App beantwortet.
UserMicha (2023-08-21 19:46:37+00:00): Ok, ich werde (als Anfänger bei OSM) mal in der Community nachfragen. Danke für die schnelle Reaktion!
miche101 (2023-01-10 16:40:13+00:00): Hi,

ist das nicht mehr aktuell weil das Datum noch 2012 sagt?

weil nach der Seite gibt es diesen noch... vielleicht nur weiter vorne beim Bahnhofsvorplatz

https://www.weihnachtsmarkt-deutschland.de/leinefelde-weihnachtsmarkt.html

Gruß Miche
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-01-01 20:16:34+00:00): This is definitely a surface parking, not a street-side
sorcrosc (2023-01-01 23:14:32+00:00): I due ristoranti sono entrambi inseriti doppi, sia sull'area esterna che sul edificio.
Ciao
Pink Duck (2023-04-06 15:32:36+00:00): The Lion Wood Nature Trail would be better mapped as a relation with the constituent ways and the related tags lifted to the relation itself. The actual paths through wood likely aren’t individually signed.
这里没有鱼 (2023-07-19 10:31:31+00:00): 不要添加不存在的测试数据，已回退
MxxCon (2023-01-03 02:12:54+00:00): Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you change every tag to have xmas prefix?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130751491
miche101 (2023-01-03 06:12:37+00:00): Hi,

I made the change because this is clearly an XMAS object. Whether it is just a Christmas object is often not easy to check. I found more than 10 keys that I would have to check before I could take a name for example. So it's better if it's just a Christmas object that has name= prefixed with xmas:name.

Best regards
miche101

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:xmas:feature

https://greymiche.lima-city.de/xmas/index.html?lat=40.7463282&lon=-73.9749493&zoom=18
MxxCon (2023-01-03 23:12:52+00:00): I think making xmas: prefix on every single tag is redundant, unnecessary and even detrimental. This only complicates object parsing for data consumers to handle yet another edge case for a small number of another type of POIs.
opening_hours= tag can already accommodate seasonal POIs that operate only during certain hours.
Putting xmas: prefix in front of other tags makes them invisible to data consumers.
miche101 (2023-01-04 06:48:29+00:00): >This only complicates object parsing for data consumers

No it makes it easier. Often two different things are done to one object. It is often impossible to say where things belong.

With my map I'm a data consumers.
When can I take the name= for example and when can I not take:
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1pHx

i am working on a list and it is long:
amenity|building|craft|emergency|highway|landuse|leisure|natural|man_made|place|shop|tourism
MxxCon (2023-01-04 06:59:30+00:00): What benefit does it give to put these features behind this namespace?! Any data consumer that doesn't know to support this prefix will simply ignore it and not use it. This prefix actually hides the data and makes it less discoverable.
The fact that you created an overpass query or a map specifically to display these Xmas: objects only further confirms that this is nothing but https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer

What's the point of having "xmas:feature:shop=christmas_tree" instead of just "shop=christmas_tree"? And the same with all the other tags. They should be standardized and be in schema with rest of OSM tags.
With this kind of misguided prefix tagging we might as well have school: for everything education related. And have retail: prefix for everything related to stores.
It is ridiculous and unnecessary. It doesn't add anything to the map that can't be expressed using existing tagging styles.
miche101 (2023-01-04 07:20:23+00:00): or we say all xmas:feature=shop we tag in the normal namespace and change the wiki
miche101 (2023-01-04 07:38:32+00:00): I dont know. I didn't invent tagging. Namespace is such modern shit.

What can we do?
miche101 (2023-01-04 08:10:25+00:00): OK i see it is only documented in Germany and in polish wiki Page in the wiki by :shop
miche101 (2023-01-04 08:11:44+00:00): Osmand app make also with Name= new Xmas Shop POI
miche101 (2023-01-04 11:48:05+00:00): ok i undid my change:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/130863175

i find it better for xmas shop to tagging than a normal shop. 
+xmas:feature=shop
+ xmas:feature:shop 	christmas_tree
only..
MxxCon (2023-01-04 14:37:03+00:00): Xmas: prefix is just as ridiculous as if you would put "road:" prefix in front of every single tag of every street. Or put "building:" prefix in front of every single tag on houses. This is just not how it's supposed to be mapped in OSM.
Somebody invented this Xmas: prefix 10+ years ago without putting much thought into it and it is most definitely not how people map in OSM now. Continuing to use it only does disservice to the OSM data integrity.
user_5359 (2023-01-03 07:15:39+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/493156669. What is the meaning of the tag onqyes = chapel?
Глеб (2023-03-02 10:12:50+00:00): что это такое, откуда взялось, почему не указан тип объекта?
IlBano (2023-02-09 18:15:32+00:00): Ciao.

Ho visto che hai inserito i quartieri di Siziano, che mi sembra un buon arricchimento della mappa. Avrei qualche considerazione da fare in merito:
- li hai classificati come landuse, ma sarebbe più corretto che siano mappati come place=neighbourhood. Questo eviterebbe anche la loro sovrapposizione con il landuse=residential generale di Siziano https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/543185977
- sei certo che la zona Porte Rosse abbia quell'estensione ovvero comprenda anche via Borsellino e Via Bachelet ?

Aggiungo in generale che i nodi delle aree di tipo landuse non vanno connessi ad altre way come strade o corsi d'acqua perchè rappresentano due entità ben distinte dal punto di vista logico. Può venire naturale unirle, ma questo è un errore e rende la manutenzione della mappa molto più complicata.
Un corso d'acqua (ad esempio) non è un campo coltivato e il campo finisce in prossimità della sponda, etc

Guardando nelle campagne attorno a Siziano avresti trovato dei buoni esempi.

Nel caso specifico ho cominciato a staccare i poligoni dalle altre feature della mappa.


IlBano
Vespo (2023-02-09 19:45:04+00:00): Salve,
grazie del commento, ti risponderò con ordine:
-modificherò la classificazione, se non è già stato fatto, come da suggerimento
-la denominazione dei quartieri è utilizzata nel linguaggio comune e non sono presenti cartelli indicativi, di conseguenza ci si riferisce alla zona porte rosse indicando l'area edificata negli ultimi 20 anni circa e che quindi non ha mai avuto un suo nome storico
IlBano (2023-02-09 19:58:19+00:00): Grazie del feedback. Sul confine effettivo di Porte Rosse pensavo partisse dalla rotatoria e quindi verso sud...era più che altro una curiosità.
Buon mapping
IlBano
NorthCrab (2023-01-01 20:28:57+00:00): Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

"Droga, która nie istnieje"
"Faktycznie jest to podjazd"
To jak w końcu, istnieje czy nie :P

Przywróciłem bo na zdjęciach widać podjazd. Oznaczyłem jako driveway. Jak jest jakaś brama to można oznaczyć jeszcze access=private.

Pozdrawiam!
Gesior (2023-01-02 11:27:26+00:00): Żadnego innego podjazdu, który jest zamykany bramą i na prywatnej posesji, nie widziałem, by był oznaczony na tym osiedlu (a prawie wszyscy mają na tym osiedlu, krótsze lub dłuższe), dlatego usunąłem tą drogę, bo wprowadzała w błąd. Ale dzięki za poradę. Pozdrawiam
NorthCrab (2023-01-02 16:20:08+00:00): kwestia szczęścia że komuś się chciało oznaczyć ale idealnie to wszystkie powinny zostać oznaczone kiedyś :P
bxl-forever (2023-01-01 15:48:56+00:00): Hello,

Thanks for adding more details about trees.

Judging by this set of recent Mapillary pictures (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=146199951203627), those two trees—along the outer side 
of the tram tracks in the curve—do not seem to exist at all, and I cannot find those two on available aerial imagery either:
* https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3116848128
* https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3116848102

You changed some tags to provide details about those trees.  Did you see them yourself?

Also, it seems that you are moving some trees away from their original location.  And you are doing that… in the iD online editor, using uncalibrated "AIV Flanders" imagery, which is slightly distorted within the Brussels-Capital Region, contrary to UrbIS layers.
Can you please explain what you are trying to achieve here.  Is there something we should know?
user_5359 (2023-01-03 07:18:37+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1126199752, http://www.osm.org/way/1126199753. what is the meaning of the tags (mostly „NULL“ values)
City = UNKNOWN
OBJECTID = 52385
OwnerAddress = UNKNOWN ADDRESS
OwnerName = UNIVERSITY OF N C
PIN = 9777379943
Shapearea = 460228.56688848685
Shapelen = 2699.2084457220076
State = XX
Zipcode = 00000
LeifRasmussen (2023-01-03 14:56:02+00:00): I copied these shapes from a chapel hill open data kml file and thought I'd removed the gis tags from them all but clearly missed those two.  Thanks for fixing them!
user_1566574 (2023-01-09 17:23:19+00:00): Hello Dhyd !
Pour https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/97667007, il n'est pas nécessaire d'ajouter :
addr:city=La Vernotte
addr:postcode=70130

Ces informations peuvent être automatiquement extraites depuis la relation qui entourent ces objets : https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/378325

Merci !
papycroods (2023-01-10 10:32:26+00:00): Compris.
Papycroods
merylstreet (2023-11-09 15:21:19+00:00): Bonjour divulmappeur,

Est-ce que les Auto Bleues existent toujours sur Nice ?
J'ai vu cet article de 2018 mais il y a des edits plus rescents, est-ce que tu te souviens ce qu'il en était 'sur place' ?

https://www.nicematin.com/vie-locale/autobleue-c-est-fini-ce-qui-va-changer-pour-les-usagers-286070
divulmappeur (2024-01-12 16:22:24+00:00): Bonjour merylstreet, pardon pour cette réponse tardive, oui effectivement ce sont des bornes de recharges qui les ont remplacés. L'ajout des horaires est une erreur de ma part. Merci de l'avoir corrigé
chris66 (2023-10-22 17:45:09+00:00): Hi, handelt es sich bei dem vor 10 Monaten von Dir eingetragenen Schwebodron um das heute erffönete Museum? 

Grüße
Chris
chris66 (2023-10-22 17:45:56+00:00): Tippfehler: eröffnete Museum.
exmatrikulator (2023-10-22 18:07:34+00:00): Ja
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:13:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533907 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:16:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:17:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:16:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:17:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:17:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:15:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:16:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:16:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:17:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:17:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:17:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:16:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:15:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:17:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:17:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:15:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:16:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:15:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:17:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:15:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:15:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:16:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:17:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:16:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:17:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:16:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:17:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:17:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:15:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:15:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:15:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:17:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:17:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:17:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:16:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:16:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
reigi (2023-01-02 06:35:05+00:00): Hallo Tutubi, herzlich willkommen bei Openstreetmap. Freut mich, dass du mitmachen möchtest. Du möchtest gerne, dass deine Änderungen überprüft werden. Du hast diese Wege mit access=no gekennzeichnet. Access bezieht sich aber auf das Recht, diese Wege zu betreten. Und das ist in diesem Fall nicht eingeschränkt. Siehe hierzu https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access. Ich kenne diese Wege und weiß, dass dort einige Bäume umgestürzt sind. Ein ähnlicher Fall wurde 2021 im Openstreetmap-Forum diskutiert https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=71992. Ich habe dein access=no mal rausgenommen und stattdessen mit description und fixme ergänzt
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130754066
wkdgs (2023-01-06 14:35:33+00:00): Vielleicht wäre hier ein Lebenszyklus-Präfix wie "destroyed" oder "abandoned" passend. Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix

Der Nachteil wäre aber, dass die meisten Karten die Wege dann nicht mehr anzeigen würden.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130754066
reigi (2023-01-06 15:22:42+00:00): "abandoned" oder "destroyed" würde in diesem Fall aber zu weit gehen. Ich weiß, dass diese Wege in der Vergangenheit ziemlich viel frequentiert wurden. Insofern hoffe ich darauf, dass sich vielleicht die eine oder andere Umfahrung bildet. Ich fahr mal von Zeit zu Zeit dort gucken.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:16:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:18:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:18:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:16:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:16:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-02-15 12:17:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162533977 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Mundi app changes - see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478/29