piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ZeLonewolf (2023-06-27 03:56:03+00:00): Hi - Budlong Farm Road has a big permanent sign at the entrance that says "Private Property Do Not Enter".  Seems pretty clear that this should be tagged access=private.  access=permissive is for roads "open to general public use" which this is pretty clearly signed otherwise.
ZeLonewolf (2023-06-27 03:58:35+00:00): Also, that road is absolutely not listed on the city plat maps:
https://www.warwickri.gov/sites/g/files/vyhlif1391/f/uploads/plat-map-369_0.pdf
ZeLonewolf (2023-06-27 04:03:14+00:00): Buttonwoods streets seem OK as public based on:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buttonwoods_Beach_Historic_District#Buttonwoods_Fire_District
Patr1k_P (2023-05-26 15:02:17+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10914573154
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10914573152

hello, a roadside crisis is marked

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dwayside_cross

if there is a crisis somewhere at the top of the hill

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made=cross

...and besides, what does it mean height=č?
Matthew Hostak (2023-05-26 15:14:34+00:00): Hi, that was a typo, forgot to switch keyboard. 
That particular cross does not technically qualify for a wayside cross but yeah it is still better tag than a cross, you are right, will fix. Thanks
user_3022894 (2023-06-14 05:02:07+00:00): Hi Leshan4ik,

du hast hier die nicht in Betrieb befindliche Station Kalkum als aktiven Bahnhof eingetragen mit railway = station + public_transport = station und train=yes. Das ist nicht richtig, da der Haltepunkt nicht in Betrieb ist. Gleichzeitig hast du den Punkt, der die Station als abandoned (aufgegeben) kennzeichnet, gelöscht. Das ist ebenfalls nicht richtig.

So, wie du es eingetragen hast, wird der Hsltepunkt jetzt zwar schön auf der Hauptkarte angezeigt, jedoch ist die Station ja nicht in Betrieb und daher sind wie gesagt die von dir hier eingetragenen Tags so nicht zutreffend und damit nicht gerechtfertigt (da sie nicht die vor Ort vorhandene Realität, sprich einen aktiven Bahnhof, abbilden).

Viele Grüße
Lukas
aka Elefant
Walk60 (2023-06-07 13:29:52+00:00): Ciao, in base ai cartelli indicatori dell'itinerario, tale località é chiamata "I Bochi" come riportato in precedenza e non "La Busta" come da te modificato. Su quali fonti ti sei basato? Grazie Walk60
Atal Hikr (2023-06-07 19:01:02+00:00): Ciao, ho modificato in "La Brusata" (non "La Busta") perché questo è il toponimo confermato da fonti locali, abitanti di San Rocco che conoscono bene la zona. So che il cartello riporta "i Bochi" ma I Bochi sono più in alto, come si può vedere anche sulla Mappa Rabbini, il catasto del Piemonte preunitario, dove il cartello indica "Busin di Sotto". Più in alto ancora c'è il vero Busin di Sotto e ancora più in alto Busin di Sopra.
Walk60 (2023-06-08 15:08:55+00:00): Ciao, grazie per le delucidazioni. Scusami, ma non ti ho scritto per mancanza di fiducia nel tuo lavoro, ma semplicemente perchè ho notato delle modifiche a mie precedenti immissioni e io per principio su OSM cerco di non modificare dati inseriti da altri prima di averli contattati, potrebbero sempre essere più informati di me. E in questo caso è proprio così. Quindi non tocco nulla.
Conosco delle persone del CAI di Domo, gli farò presente questa incongruenza, caso mai avessero voglia di riposizionare i cartelli per i vari insediamenti.
Questa mattina sono ritornato su anch'io, sino a Busin di Sopra, ne ho approfittato per aggiungere e correggere qualche rudere che mancava; in effetti anche il cartello Busin di Sotto, posizionato accanto al primo rudere salendo (che tu indichi come Bochi) è un pò fuorviante, essendo poi le case vere e proprie più in alto.
Ciao e buone mappature.
Ubaldo
Toygar Alak (2023-05-21 19:22:14+00:00): Lütfen bir daha yanlış olan eski haline döndürmeyiniz.
eggie (2023-05-20 19:36:39+00:00): Als je goed kijkt is er al een adresnode. Daar kun je op bijtaggen.. Anders heb je twee adressen.
De tagging is verder goed, maar wordt helaas nog niet ondersteund door de OSM standaardkaart.
Je ziet niets.
Sommige mappers voegen dan wel eens amenity=community_centre toe omdat het een clubhuis is.
Dat rendert wel.
Het wordt tijd dat die sportclubs gaan renderen. 
De info heb ik samengevoegd.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-05-20 19:37:35+00:00): leisure=sports_centre erbij doet ook wonderen en die valg zal de lading wel dekken.
eggie (2023-05-20 19:51:19+00:00): typo 'vlag
silversurfer83 (2023-05-21 11:21:05+00:00): Hi
as I am absolutely unfamiliar with tagging practices in Japan I'm rather curious as to why you deleted so many tags that seem to be of some kind of value to our japanese community. Like this highway (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/124321937/history) where you deleted all tags with the "yh:" prefix. 
If there is a valid reason, that's fine. But like I said, I'm curious and would like to know why

cheers
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136350516
ÄDIÄDI (2023-05-21 16:36:28+00:00): Moin,
if I removed tags it wasn't intentional. I have no idea why the tags disappeared. What I know is that the data (shape and position) of the roads in this area of Japan are provided to OSM by the IT company "YAHOO". (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/YahooJapanALPS_Data)
It's possible that the "yh:" tag stands for the data provided by Yahoo and automatically disappears when a user modifies the objects (in this case Yahoo's streets).
Thanks for the hint
Tschüs
nyampire (2023-05-22 02:23:32+00:00): JOSM deletes those tags automatically.

https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/8109
silversurfer83 (2023-05-22 03:05:42+00:00): Thank you both for your answers. Learned something new today
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2023-05-23 13:09:58+00:00): You added trees as buildings. Please use the correct tags for trees and/or wood (natural=wood)
AntMadeira (2023-05-22 12:28:16+00:00): Olá, tomas_
Neste conjunto de edições eliminaste um posto de carregamento elétrico. Além disso, fizeste bem em criar o edifício do supermercado, mas nesse caso o ponto já não é necessário. Quando crias um polígono, o ponto deixa de ser necessário.

Qualquer dúvida, já sabes.

Cumprimentos,
António Madeira.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136350757
Dodko (2023-05-21 09:04:19+00:00): K predajniam je dobré pridať názov a otvárací čas, pomôcka je https://projets.pavie.info/yohours/

Ak sú to stavebniny pridáva sa aj značka
trade=building_supplies
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=trade
Frans S (2023-05-21 10:32:33+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
Please check your knowledge how to tag highways.
f.e. wide roads, with a thoroughgoing character, are tagged as track.
Roads in rural areas have been tagged as residential. Sorry to say, but nearly all highways are wrongly tagged.
See this wiki how to tag highways,
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway

I am not familiar with rapid ID, but there must be an option to measure a trace, to decide if it should be tagged as a pathe (max 2 mtr wide) or a ...highway
btw, I noticed the same issue on tasks you have validated. Can you check  them as well.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136350787
eggie (2023-05-20 20:38:29+00:00): Dat leisure=sport_centre geeft een foutmelding, want het grote vlak over het terrein is al als sports_center gemapt.
Geen idee of dat wel terecht is een vlak sports_centre zonder naam hier. 
De naam van de club zal nu wel verschijnen op de kaart. Paar keer ctrl-f5 toetsen.
Groet
eggie
eggie (2023-05-20 20:39:40+00:00): Lijkt me oke zo...
ivanbranco (2023-05-20 22:23:36+00:00): Ciao Ago, se le strade sono private vanno segnate come access=private, non cancellate.
ivanbranco (2023-05-24 07:25:49+00:00): Le ho ripristinate, buon mapping
joost schouppe (2023-06-07 14:13:36+00:00): Hoi Stijn,
Ben je zeker dat https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/213537507 werkelijk zo kort is? Op basis van Strava en het hoogtemodel lijkt het stuk dat je hebt weggenomen toch minstens een pad.
CurlingMan13 (2023-06-11 06:13:02+00:00): Please use more descriptive changeset comments.  What did you do?  Why?  etc.?  "Yes" tells me nothing.

More details can be found here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments#:~:text=A%20good%20changeset%20comment%20should,have%20edited%20on%20the%20map.
i2004 (2023-05-26 12:09:40+00:00): consulta el 60 sentido a rincon/maschwitz y el 343 sentido tigre hacen sobremonte simon de iriondo alem ambrosoni sobrmeonte o sobremonte derecho
AgusQui (2023-05-26 18:32:35+00:00): Parece que siguen derecho
burrscurr (2023-05-30 10:50:34+00:00): Hi!

Die Hansastraße (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/361268404) und die Eisenbahnstraße (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/216509663) sind jetzt als highway=road getaggt - also ohne Angabe einer genauen Straßenkategorie. (Vielleicht liegt das daran, dass vorher nicht construction=primary o.Ä. getaggt war und StreetComplete deshalb auch keinen Straßentyp angeben kann.) Kannst du die korrekten Straßentypen wieder herstellen? Außerdem ist mir noch aufgefallen, dass ein kleiner Abschnitt (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/397884757) weiter als Baustelle getaggt ist. Keine Ahnung, ob das so zutrifft.

Danke.
wille (2023-05-22 18:53:17+00:00): Oi Antonio. Revisei algumas edições suas. Algumas sugestões.
Se você encontrar a copa de uma árvore, em vez de mapear como área, adicione um ponto e mapeie como árvore (há essa opção para pontos).
Não utilize nomes genéricos, como "Árvore", só precisamos adicionar um nome quando o elemento realmente tem um nome.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136352974
Aleksandar Matejevic (2023-05-24 10:46:09+00:00): Hi, 
can you finish the relations:
R15881727 - Wierzbowo	 	
R15881729 - Szulmierz
R15881730 - Kołaki-Kwasy

I do not get any data from the Geoportal so I can not finish them by myself.

Thanks, 
Aleksandar Matejevic
eggie (2023-05-21 06:13:03+00:00): Nee... lokale kennis gaat voor.
Het is dus correct gedaan.
We is het handig om even source=gpstracklog oid  toe te voegen, want een medemapper trekt het anders gewoon weer recht.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-05-21 06:16:16+00:00): Hier de laatste foto van 13 mei.
Het is altijd net even anders  :)
https://www.satellietdataportaal.nl/?base=openstreetmap&res=0.3%2C0.5&datemin=21-05-2022&loc=52.53196%2C4.707599%2C19z&overlay=mos-0&marker=loc&acqdate=2023-03-13&acqid=20230313_110739_PNEO-03_1_12&sensor=Pleiades-NEO
eggie (2023-05-21 06:53:36+00:00): Al die wegen hier zijn nauwelijks bewerkt sinds de import uit het bestand van kaartenmaker AND (2007).
De wegen staan nog bijna allemaal op unclassified. Dat kun je veranderen in residential mocht je zin hebben. Een aantal hier heb ik al omgezet.
Voor belangrijke doorgaande wegen geldt dit niet. Die kunnen een hogere wegklasse hebben. 
Groet
eggie.
eggie (2023-05-21 05:33:05+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
De bedrijfsinfo heb ik verplaatst naar de adresnode conform afspraken binnen OSM Nederland. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Comino (2023-05-23 11:48:32+00:00): Bedankt voor de info. Wat betekent "De bedrijfsinfo heb ik verplaatst naar de adresnode conform afspraken binnen OSM Nederland."? Mag ik mijn eigen bedrijf niet toevoegen? Heb ik iets verkeerd gedaan? Moet ik geduld hebben qua verwerking?

Zie wel dat andere bedrijven in mijn dorp zichtbaar zijn. Wil graag e.e.a. aanvullen/verbeteren/toevoegen maar dan graag wat hulp/uitleg.

Bedankt alvast daarvoor.
eggie (2023-05-23 11:59:16+00:00): Beste ShurR,

Het bedrijf is gewoon zichtbaar op de kaart.
Wellicht even CTRL-F5 toetsen een paar keer. Cache leegmaken van het browserscherm.
Bijvoegen van extra info kan. De adresnode selecteren en regels aanvullen indien nodig.
Sinds de import van adresnodes vanuit de BAG gebruiken we deze om bedrijven op bij te taggen. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-05-21 06:09:55+00:00): SKort
Adres 75 heb je hiermee verwijderd.
Ik heb dat hersteld. 
Mocht 75 niet meer bestaan laat het dan even weten.
Garage west heb ik samengevoegd met BAGnode nr 73.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-05-21 06:01:20+00:00): Dag S Kort

De info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode.
Je hoeft geen adressen zelf aan te maken.
MVG
eggie
ivanbranco (2023-05-20 23:02:00+00:00): Ciao, nei casi in cui sostituisci un nodo con un area, tipo qua https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2246138018/history con https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1174637529
verifica di aver prima trasferito tutti i tag, tipo fee=no, parking=surface ed access=yes

buon mapping
Carbon Award (2023-05-21 13:38:29+00:00): Hai ragione, grazie!
SomeoneElse (2023-05-20 21:34:10+00:00): My guess of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/996601874 for the route of the CW and the CHT is based on what had been previously mapped to the west.
wkdgs (2023-05-22 08:18:50+00:00): Hi,

ein "," ist der korrekte Trenner bei den Wochentagsaufzählungen (z.B. "Mo,Tu,We") oder den Zeiten ("z.B. "08:00-12:00,14:00-18:00").

Wenn man die Gruppen aus Wochentagen und Zeiten trennen möchte, ist ein ";" der korrekte Trenner. Z.B. "Mo-Fr 10:00-22:00; Sa-So 10:00-17:00".

Kannst du auf der Wiki-Seite nachlesen:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours

Das "," als Trenner zwischen den Gruppen wird zwar auch öfter verwendet und sollte den meisten Tools auch keine Probleme bereiten, ein einheitliches Tagging, das sich am Wiki orientiert, ist aber meiner Meinung nach besser.

Kannst du die geänderten Öffnungszeiten wieder auf ";" umstellen?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136353862
user_125718 (2023-05-22 12:33:52+00:00): Gerade weil Leute den deiner Meinung nach „korrekten Trenner“ für Sachen wie  "Mo-We 18:00-06:00; Th-Su 19:00-03:00“ benutzt haben, habe ich das korrigiert, weil so nämlich Do von 0-6 Uhr geschlossen ist, da ";" vorherige Tage überschreibt, siehe Spezifikation, bzw. die von mir hoffentlich etwas verbesserte deutsche Wikiseite.
felipeeugenio (2023-05-20 23:41:44+00:00): Hola. Gracias por sus ediciones. Pero por favor cuidar la ortografía y las mayúsculas. Gracias
eggie (2023-05-21 05:55:11+00:00): Dag SKort

Je hebt het (kadaster) adres verwijderd.
Ik zal het herstellen.
eggie
Tooslow (2023-05-22 10:45:47+00:00): Thanks for your help.
Regards,
John
eggie (2023-05-21 05:54:08+00:00): Dit is correct.. Het adres bleef intact.
eggie (2023-05-21 05:53:20+00:00): Alle begin is moeilijk.  
Tip.. Probeer direct bij te taggen op de juiste adresnode .. Dus geen adressen veranderen, want die ontbreekt dan in de data.
Ik heb je info samengevoegd en nr 36 hersteld.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-05-21 05:44:49+00:00): Beste SKort.. Hier zit toch niet Middelweg 95?
Zoek in zo'n geval de adesnode op en probeer daar op bij te taggen. We maken in osm geen adressen aan. 
Het adres zal ik vast even verwijderen.  
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-05-21 05:45:41+00:00): Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=136354300
eggie (2023-05-21 05:49:40+00:00): Kapper gekoppeld aan nr 95 in de straat.
gr eggie
Hufkratzer (2023-05-21 21:26:55+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1174659193 is quite small for a racecourse; maybe leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian would be better, compare
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a#Racecourse_(horse_racing)
Koltai András (2023-05-22 07:56:36+00:00): Youre, right, it is actually a paddock. I changed it to "Horse riding/Rodeo arena" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport=equestrian).
Famlam (2023-05-27 09:12:41+00:00): Be aware that this mass import (also the other changesets minutes before or after this one) seems to use the rooftops of buildings of images used with a tilted view. Hence there's much roads that now overlap with buildings.

See for example way 1174663057
Superadlen (2023-05-31 11:44:56+00:00): Thank you. Yes, I know about this. There are my friends in our group for creating the map. They are the ones who will take care of this. I am sending large information that I cannot correct at the time
Yankowsky (2023-06-10 10:35:28+00:00): Hej, tutaj https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dvolcano ani tutaj https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:historic nie ma nic na temat twojego sposobu tagowania wygasłych wulkanów, skąd więc u ciebie taki sposób ich oznaczania?
maraf24 (2023-06-10 12:56:12+00:00): Wygasły wulkan nie jest wulkanem. Przynajmniej na terenie Polski.
Był parę lat temu ten temat poruszany na forum, wówczas ktoś też próbował tagować je jak zwykłe wulkany.
Główny powód jest opisany tutaj: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Trolltag
Yankowsky (2023-06-18 09:10:06+00:00): Rozumiem, dziękuję.
Claudius Henrichs (2023-05-22 07:59:22+00:00): Dobrý den Vojta,
I would argue that Lines 1 and 2 of Guadalajara Metro are still light rails with some underground sections for the following reasons:
- They have sections that are overground and contain level crossings with car traffic. That alone usually is sufficient for the infrastructure to be not considered a subway in OSM
- The rolling stock TEG-90 and TEG-15 that is being used is not of a heavy metro but more of a heavy tram both in passenger capacity and speed
- Electrification is done via overhead wires instead of a third rail (not an exclusive argument against subway tagging, but subways are more likely to have third rail).
For more details on picking the right tagging see this section on the OSM wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Dlight_rail#Recommendations

I would ask you to re-consider the tagging as a light rail to be in line with how this tagging is used in OSM and not have another local deviation.
I am happy to help reverting the tagging. Let me know if you want to take up the offer.

Best,
Claudius
Vojta Vilímec (2023-05-22 23:26:43+00:00): Done Claudius. You are right. Have a great day!
jumbanho (2024-04-16 17:15:46+00:00): Hi, I noticed that you upgraded CR 70 to trunk (along with CR23 and MN 50 in other changesets).  In the original discussion of mapping a trunk network that was had among Minnesota mappers (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Minnesota/Minnesota_highway_classification#Trunk_highways for a summary) this route was not included.  Was there a subsequent discussion that came to a consensus to add this section as trunk?
streckenkundler (2023-05-21 09:50:44+00:00): Mensch, du hast es drauf! Danke und beide Daumen hoch...

weiter westlich, bei der 66 ist mir die Rotenfühung verunglückt... bei der 43 am Bahnhof weiß ich nicht, ob der Punkt da passt...

Sven
mbit (2023-05-21 12:08:33+00:00): Danke, mir hat diese Anleitung gut geholfen: <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:JochenB/split_nodes>. Und dann noch ein bisschen probiert, bis bei /knooppuntnet.nl/ keine Fehler mehr waren. Ich würde mir jetzt nach und nach die anderen innerstädischen Knoten vornehmen. 
Die von Dir bearbeitete Route 51-83 https://knooppuntnet.nl/de/analysis/route/15881629 würde ich bei Gelegenheit an die "offizielle" Radwegeführung anpassen. Die ist über den gesamten Bereich des Nordrings ein bisschen "außergewöhnlich", mal als einseitiger Geh- und Radweg mit Zweirichtungsverkehr, mal als Gehweg mit "Radfahrer frei" und andere Spezialitäten. Der in der Tabelle als "nicht zugänglich" gekennzeichnete Bereich ist wirklich nicht für Radfahrer zu empfehlen, da sehr schmal und hohe Bordkante zur Fahrbahn. 

Gruß Matthias
muralito (2023-05-22 17:23:28+00:00): Hola. Como sugerencia, cuando cambies nombres de calles hay dos cosas a tener en cuenta. 1. ver de dejar el nombre viejo en la etiqueta old_name que sirve para buscarlo por el nombre viejo, porque en la realidad sigue existiendo en direcciones, documentos, paginas, etc. 2. Cambiar el nombre también en los nodos de dirección, los que tienen el addr:street.
eggie (2023-05-21 05:36:39+00:00): Dag SKort

Meestal zijn tweewielers uitgezonderd van oneway=yes 
Is dat hier het geval, want fietsknooppuntroute 20-24 is nu geblokkeerd?
In zo'n geval toevoegen oneway:bicycle=no

en indien nodig ook voor moped en mofa.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-05-21 05:40:37+00:00): Uitzonderingen toegevoegd. Het routeert weer.
groet
eggie
Anas masuris (2023-06-16 14:16:07+00:00): Żurawie wodne (te kolejowe) oznacza się jako railway=water_crane.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenRailwayMap/Tagging

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Dwater_crane
emersonveenstra (2023-05-21 09:51:29+00:00): Hi,

You seem to have broken the Central Pennington boundary by leaving an open part here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15881376#map=17/44.05759/-103.17124

Could you please fix that? Thanks
emersonveenstra (2023-05-21 09:57:35+00:00): and also here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15881376#map=19/43.96570/-103.35020
Molandfreak (2023-05-21 17:08:52+00:00): Sure thing! I'll fix that right away.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-05-27 06:06:46+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7148
graue (2023-05-21 06:37:22+00:00): Why did you want to create a separate way for the southbound bike lane? It was adequately mapped before.

The wiki says, "

Cycling infrastructure that is an inherent part of a road - particularly 'cycle lanes' which are a part of the road - should usually not be tagged as a separate cycleway, but by adding the cycleway=* tag to an existing highway=* instead." https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dcycleway

If it's going to be a separate way, it should probably have the "Scott Street" name for directions and the residual northbound-only way should be one-way for bicycles.
LamBiking (2023-05-30 06:18:09+00:00): Why have you added this tag to this sidewalk? My understanding was sidewalks shouldn't be tagged with bicycle (in QLD) unless a shared path with on ground signage for example?
bruceas (2023-05-30 09:51:15+00:00): Hello LamBiking
Thanks for your comment.
As the Qld Traffic Rules allow bicycles to use footpaths/sidewalks across Qld (unless signed otherwise), I noted the feature's "Allowed Access" for Bicycles to be "yes".  If there were shared path signage actually in place (which there isn't at this location), I would have used "Designated" as the Allowed Access, rather than just 'yes'.
Hope this clarifies this for you.
Cheers
MatthewAndersonUS80 (2023-06-13 22:12:02+00:00): Revert this change please. I-69E has not been signed on this section of US 77, nor has it been approved by AASHTO.
Violaine_Do (2024-11-25 23:55:25+00:00): Bonjour et merci pour tes contributions. Attention à ne pas dépacer les batis mais plutôt l'imagerie si ca ne "colle" pas. Les batis sont issus de la donnée topo du Pays, donnée plus fiable que les imageries...
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136358329
NorthCrab_upload (2023-05-21 04:40:11+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/303451189
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/303451202

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
arctic-rocinante (2024-03-10 00:26:38+00:00): Hi there, thanks for mapping all this! I had a question about this flagpole though:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10607154509

I haven’t come across “not:flag:wikidata” before and aren’t sure what it means. Is it a typo, or is it literally supposed to mean “this isn’t a French flag”?

Thanks!
Canadianspruce (2023-05-21 04:50:21+00:00): Road closed seasonally