piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Map-Peter (2023-08-19 16:04:20+00:00): Hallo Herr Lehmanowsky,
 
du hattest hier drei "barrier=*" jeweils auf den Kreuzungspunkt von von zwei Wegen gemappt: https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=139972423 .  
So etwas ist falsch und wird auch im Wiki als Fehler aufgeführt: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:barrier%3Dgate .
 
Außerdem hattest du hier aus einem "highway=service" einen "highway=unclassified" gemacht - auch das ist in diesem Fall falsch, siehe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Attribuierung_von_Stra%C3%9Fen_in_Deutschland#Nebenstra%C3%9Fen .
 
Habe ich eben alles korrigiert.
 
Gruß Peter
NieWnen (2023-08-17 16:25:45+00:00): Jak budynek widać na orto/jest w EGiBie, to warto zmieniać go na `demolished:building=*` zamiast od razu usuwać, żeby nie został dodany ponownie. 

Natomiast ten po wyburzeniowy landuse, to raczej nazwa powinna być w `description`
ntzm (2023-08-21 10:45:40+00:00): I'm sorry but these changes aren't correct, please could you revert?
ntzm (2023-08-21 10:47:24+00:00): Apologies, wrong changeset
Thierry1030 (2023-08-16 17:17:36+00:00): Hello, I sent you a private message. Did you receive it?
Could you please read the guidelines concerning changeset comments? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Can I ask you what you modified here?
NorthCrab_upload (2023-08-16 16:40:19+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4804005021

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Thierry1030 (2023-08-16 17:18:57+00:00): Hello, I sent you a private message. Did you receive it?
Could you please read the guidelines concerning changeset comments? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Can I ask you what you modified here? What is your source?
Bruno1460 (2023-08-16 19:09:38+00:00): I had to split the road at the level of the crossing with the Chemin des norbertins because it is a double crossroads
Langlaeufer (2023-08-16 18:50:28+00:00): Hallo cave2596,
ein sidewalk=right impliziert bereits sidewalk:left=no. auch sollten die Syntaxvarianten sidewalk=* und sidewalk:*= nicht miteinander vermischt werden.
Grüße
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139973522
Langlaeufer (2023-08-16 18:51:15+00:00): Sorry, alles o.k. SC hat sidewalk:left ja entfernt und nicht hinzugefügt.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139973522
5m4u9 (2023-08-17 06:09:18+00:00): Hola, gracias por editar el mapa y actualizar el negocio, encontré algunos errores, el resto de la edición genial.

No es real que toda la propiedad sea un edificio, ya se tiene dibujada el área construida, la etiqueta/campo "brand/marca" solo aplica para cadenas de hoteles/restaurantes/supermercados.
jb54osm (2023-08-16 18:30:25+00:00): Dag lyctkel,

Mmm, had ik toch niet moeten vertrouwen op de handmatige reparaties van onze Duitse vriend en gewoon alles door de revert moeten gooien. Da's voor een volgende keer ...
lyctkel (2023-08-18 17:17:18+00:00): Dag  jb54osm,
Je stopt nooit met leren.
... maar natuurlijk is dat frustrerend.
Isabela Floriam (2023-08-16 17:14:27+00:00): não está aparecendo
user_5359 (2023-08-17 11:03:31+00:00): Welcome to OSM (again)! Please check your entries against my comments of the other change set.
emersonveenstra (2023-08-17 11:35:37+00:00): Hi,

Please pay attention to the warnings the editor gives before submitting changes, you had several places where the sidewalks crossed a road but did not have a shared node between them. Thanks!
znikolai (2023-08-17 13:43:55+00:00): Thanks for the reminder! I do have a related question.  Updating some sidewalks which are sort of standalone since they go around a building near a parking lot... it gives an error that they are disconnected.  Should they be tied to nearby roads / parking lanes?
emersonveenstra (2023-08-17 17:02:07+00:00): yes, generally you'll connect them to roads. It's sort of weird because of the OSM rendering, but if there's a way to get from the sidewalk to the road, then connect it to the road there.
mcliquid (2023-08-16 18:03:35+00:00): Hi, warum löschst du die deutschen Adressen in Mittelberg? Hast du die "note" überhaupt gelesen? Bitte damit aufhören.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139975290
timstreetmap (2023-08-16 18:10:14+00:00): Deutsche Hausnummer in Österreich?
timstreetmap (2023-08-16 18:11:11+00:00): Alles doppelt hier. Naja, mir soll es recht sein.
mcliquid (2023-08-16 18:12:55+00:00): Ja, Mittelberg gehört zur Exklave des Kleinwalsertals indem es deutsche und österreichische Adressen gibt.
Siehe auch https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kleinwalsertal#Zollausschlussgebiet

Wäre auch in der note gestanden, wenn du diese gelesen hättest.
timstreetmap (2023-08-16 18:17:40+00:00): Habe es nachgelesen. "Alle Postämter führen zwei Stempel, einen mit österreichischer Postleitzahl und einen zweiten mit der deutschen. Eigentlich sollten die deutschen Postleitzahlen (87567 Riezlern, 87568 Hirschegg, 87569 Mittelberg) zum 31. Dezember 2006 abgeschafft werden, wurden jedoch nach Protesten beibehalten (die österreichischen sind 6991, 6992 respektive 6993)." Das ist ja wie ein gallisches Dorf hier... Sorry, wieder was gelernt
felipeeugenio (2023-08-16 19:14:27+00:00): Hola. 
Gracias por las ediciones. entiendo que conoce la zona.
dos temas:
1) el tag building= es para las estructuras, no para el recinto completo del colegio.
2) las clasificaciones de caminos son un poco complicadas de comprender en un principio, por lo cual por favos abtenerse de cambiarlas. por lo pronto, el tag service para el Colegio está ok.

Queda invitado al chat de la comunidad OSM Chile en el link de Telegram (app muy similar a whatsapp) https://t.me/OSMcl.

saludos
eggie (2023-08-16 18:37:20+00:00): Dag Sander... Wanneer dit het Museum is moet er dan niet een museumtag op ipv de foundation?

Dus 
tourism=museum
name=Rotterdams Openbaar Vervoer Museum
operator= Stichting RoMeO
website=....   enz

Dan krijg je een museum symbool op de kaart.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dmuseum

Op de gebouwomtrek hoort niet nogmaals het adres. Dat kan er af.

MVG
eggie
sandervdo (2023-08-16 19:08:15+00:00): Hoi eggie, bedankt voor het reviewen. Ik ben niet helemaal zeker wat beter is. Het Museum is één van de activiteiten die vanuit deze tram-remise worden verzorgd door de stichting. Het is tevens de werkplaats/stalling voor de historische voertuigen die gebruikt worden op straat. Als ik je bericht zo lees dan denk ik desondanks dat het beste dit gemarkeerd kan worden als museum inderdaad. Laat vooral weten indien je het daar niet mee eens bent, ik pas het graag aan zodat het netjes klopt. :)

Groet,

Sander
eggie (2023-08-16 19:13:49+00:00): Hoi..
De naam suggereert ook museum. Veel musea hebben ook andere activiteiten.. den aan bv Naturalis.
Je zou het als bovenstaand kunnen aanpassen op de adresnode..

Het adres op de gebouwomtrek heb ik al verwijderd.

Succes..
eggie
user_5359 (2023-08-17 10:36:56+00:00): Welcome to OSM (again)! Please be careful when editing the map data. You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/181107060 over 100 meters, so there were problems with the corresponding way. I have moved the point back to its original position.
Emilius123 (2023-08-16 19:11:27+00:00): Hallo,

Erzähl mal, was hat "XXXXXXXXXXXF " zu heißen?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139976802
WoSoe (2023-08-17 03:12:34+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/XXXXXXXXXXXF
Thierry1030 (2023-08-16 18:17:11+00:00): Hello, I sent you a private message. Did you receive it?
Could you please read the guidelines concerning changeset comments? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Can I ask you what you modified here? What is your source?
Bruno1460 (2023-08-16 19:05:43+00:00): This is a new itinerary by the walloon region as replacement to the national road. I cycled it yesterday and it is perfectly fine and signposted.
Bruno1460 (2023-08-16 19:07:29+00:00): Actually, it is signposted from Mariembourg via Matagne-la-Grande (W8), Olloy (L352) and Oignies
user_5359 (2023-08-17 10:33:35+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I remove your way "Path in Neighborhood". Please be more careful when entering details.
rarad74 (2023-08-16 19:41:30+00:00): Salut. Mare atentie ca adresele ar trebui sa fie cumva spre partea de cladire care are usa de acces. In mai toata tara adresele puse pe noduri sunt puse in fata cladirii. Hai sa nu le amestecam prea mult.
dpolovinkin (2023-08-16 19:47:42+00:00): Salut! Vreau doar să fac astfel încât adresele să corespundă clădirii cu această adresă și să nu fie doar pe stradă. Nu voi muta acele adrese unde nu este clar de ce clădire este legată. De asemenea, are sens pentru mine să pun punctul de adresă aproape de partea străzii unde ar trebui să fie intrarea

Am vrut să întreb și eu, de ce adresele sunt pe stradă în fața blocului în multe locuri din București? Nu am mai văzut așa ceva în niciun alt oraș pe care l-am cartografiat. Mulțumiri!
rarad74 (2023-08-17 20:24:49+00:00): Sunt asa si pe alte harti foarte renumite. De exemplu cele de la HereWeGo. E foarte logic sa stea in fata cladirii respective. Poate este necesar sa pui POI-uri pe cladire. Asa vor fi vizibile si POI-urile si numerele de adrese. Acum daca pui numar pe cladire si vrei sa pui si un POI sau mai multe ( in cazul blocurilor) nu se vor vedea distinct, ambele fiind foarte apropiate. Am stabilit un curs despre cum se pun adresele in Bucuresti, atunci este de recomandat sa il urmam toti, nu cum vine unul cu o alta idee sa se apuce sa schimbe. Facem o varza din harta asa pana la urma. PS: Numerele in Bucuresti in mare parte au fost importate si apoi verificate si interen de diferiti editori de-a lungul timpului. Si toti le-au lasat asa, tocmai ca sa poate fi puse POI-urile pe cladire la o distanta de numarul de adresa.
dpolovinkin (2023-08-21 12:57:29+00:00): mulțumim pentru răspuns! punctul dvs. de vedere despre POI este de înțeles, dar care este problema de a nu face puncte de adresă separate dacă clădirea este doar una singură - doar adăugați un număr la proprietățile clădirii și asta e tot? aruncați o privire la centrul orașului Zurich, de exemplu, un oraș obiectiv foarte bine cartografiat (în timp ce în București există atât, atât de multe clădiri care lipsesc cu desăvârșire chiar în centrul orașului, ca să spunem așa), este clar și simplu peste tot. Și pe HereWeGo e același lucru și acolo. Iar în multe dintre orașele în care m-am uitat pe OSM, adresele fie sunt așa, fie sunt la mijlocul clădirii, deci oricum nu vor interfera cu POI.

În plus, răspundeți-mi vă rog - dacă tot vorbiți de *potențiala* interferență cu POI-uri inexistente, uitați-vă aici, doar un exemplu din multele exemple - https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/44.43758/26.11879 - încerc să navighez către clădirea numărul 8.. sau 20.. sau aproape oricare dintre ele, cum pot să fac asta? Adresele de acest gen au sens pentru dumneavoastră? Nu văd nici măcar un POI care să se încurce în a le pune într-un loc corect...

ENG:
thanks for answering! your point about POI is understandable, but what's the problem of just not making a separate address points if the building is just one - just add a number to the building properties and that's it? take a look at the middle of Zurich for example, objectively very well mapped city (while in Bucharest there are a so, so many buildings which are just completely missing right in the center of the city, just saying), its clear and simple everywhere. And on HereWeGo it's the same thing there. And in a lot of cities I looked on OSM, addresses are either like that, or they are at the middle of the building, so they won't interfere with POI anyway.

Plus, answer me this please - while you saying about *potential* interference with inexistent POI, take a look here, just an one of many examples - https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/44.43758/26.11879  - I'm trying to navigate to building number 8.. or 20... or almost any of them, how can I do it? Do addresses like this make sense to you? I'm not seeing a single POI to mess with putting them to a correct place...
rarad74 (2023-08-30 19:58:12+00:00): Nu trebuie sa iti dau socoteala in niciun fel. Nu trebuie sa iti explic nimic. Comunitatea e de acord asa cum sunt puse adresele. Daca era o problema, pana acum erau discutii si se facea ceva in privinta asta. Am muncit sa colectez zeci de mii de adrese din teren, nu ca sa vii tu sa imi dai lectii despre cum se pun adresele. Eu editez pe aici de prin 2009, deci scuza-ma daca ne deranjezi cand vii si incepi sa ne iei la intrebari ca de ce nu e cum vrea chelia ta. Nu era absolut deloc nevoie de interventiile tale pe harta. Nu asa cum ai inceput tu sa faci mass edit-uri de unul singur.
dpolovinkin (2023-09-01 16:40:59+00:00): well, that's interesting, weird and hilarious in a way...

Firstly, well yeah, you kinda have to answer other people who are also committing to OSM if you want to have a productive collaboration and find solution of different problems, and not ignoring questions. Even DWG says that people should answer and explain themselves before taking any action against them.

Secondly, which community are you talking about when you are saying that "it's fine with it"? From what I saw, Telegram chat consist of like.. less than 10 active people who actually interact there, it's not like there are a lot of people committing to OSM here, and when the question was raised regarding those weird positioning of addresses, responses from different people were, quoting:
- "Yeah I don't like that either..."
- "not sure who had the bright idea to let address points hang "in the air"
- "it makes sense sometimes (like an empty land parcel where there's no physical feature to put the addr on), but most times it's annoying."
- "I like mapping the addresses as a point, but those are too close to the road, they should be over the middle point of the building"
- "features have addresses, so address points should be attached to features, imo"
There were no people who were saying that yeah those addresses make complete sense, lol.

And lastly, well, Bucharest in itself the only, how to say, sloppily mapped big city which I saw for now, starting from those addresses which are just floating in the air and often give 0 value to actual users who use this map, then there are just so many buildings which are completely missing in the center of the city, I'd expect that the capital city wouldn't have this, but here were are and nobody is really fixing it here. And then there is a hideous infestation of extremely incorrect mapping of every individual tree in many places in the city, which is just surreal, nobody does that, makes no sense.

And them I'm the traveller who visited you country and decided to make the map better, and here you are gatekeeping hard af. Well I don't live here, so I don't really care that much about the map in Romania, but you should really think twice about what you are doing, because no matter the amount of changesets, you with 40k have the same "rights" as me with 1k, and you are not "owning" the country here lol, I have the same option to report you and rollback your changes to my changesets.
wabozand (2023-08-17 20:08:20+00:00): Correction: Source used was Esri World Imagery, Mapillary.
Emilius123 (2023-08-16 19:10:47+00:00): Hallo,

Erstmal, willkommen bei OpenStreetMap und vielen Dank für deine Bearbeitung!

Nur hast du in diesem Änderungssatz hier leider das Tag "building=house" angibt, dass, wie der Name vermuten lässt, angibt, dass es sich hierbei um ein Gebäude, genauergesagt ein freistehendes Haus handelt. Aber keine Sorge, ich habe das rückgängig gemacht.

Weiterhin, vielen Dank für deine Bearbeitung und viel Spaß auf OpenStreetMap!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139977863
MxxCon (2023-08-22 02:24:26+00:00): Hello.
While your changeset messages are not wrong, if it's a hassle for you to manually count all the benches and trash cans and picnic tables you added, those things can be omitted in favor of a more general overview of changes, especially for relatively simple edits in a small area. 👍🙂
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139978322
adiatmad (2023-08-21 03:00:37+00:00): Hey, great job on your edits! Just wanted to give you a quick heads up about something. It's better to avoid using generic names like "name=building" (you can see an example here: https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1198779505). Check out this page (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions) for more info on why.
If you're interested in learning more about mapping, there are some awesome free resources you can check out:
> Beginner's Mapping guide: https://osm.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide.
> Self-paced learning modules for intermediate/advanced mappers: https://learnosm.org
Happy mapping and keep up the good work!
mueschel (2023-08-20 13:24:37+00:00): Hi,
please check the spelling of the keys you add. I'm fixing spelling mistakes in the keys of Monoglian names almost every day!, e.g. at_name -> alt_name,  mn_mong -> mn-Mong etc.
jxpsert (2023-08-20 14:17:39+00:00): Hoi! Ik meen dat DWG had gevraagd dit eerst te bespreken op het community forum, alvorens dit uit te voeren. Is dit inmiddels gebeurd?
SomeoneElse (2023-08-26 12:03:31+00:00): I've asked about this at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/stadhuis-of-stadhuis-enschede/103056 .
74523978 (2023-12-07 19:13:46+00:00): Je meent het verkeerd. En bedoelt het denigrerend. Ik ben niet jouw sloofje. De wiki maakt de dienst uit, niet jouw vijandige fantasie en hoogmoed.
jbcharron (2023-08-16 19:24:34+00:00): Bonsoir,
Merci de votre contribution, mais le lycée Fabert est déjà cartographié en tant que zone. Pouvez-vous supprimer le noeud que vous avez créé ?
Merci d'avance
Bonne soirée
mini-me (2023-08-16 23:26:36+00:00): Не нужно заполнять все поля, достаточно access=private.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:access
eggie (2023-08-17 07:57:09+00:00): Top!
eggie (2023-08-16 19:51:27+00:00): Dag OMG

Je vraagt feedback..

Verwijderen?  Waarom? 

Volgens mij heeft Damen dit veer overgenomen. 
 Vanaf 14 augustus 2023 verzorgt Damen hiermee volledig de dienstregeling in een dagelijks schema van 06:00-24:00 uur. 

https://www.zuid-holland.nl/onderwerpen/verkeer-vervoer/openbaar-vervoer/personenvervoer/veer-maassluis-rozenburg/

Zou dit veer dan beter niet gewoon weer opengesteld moeten worden. Er lopen ook tig routerelaties op. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-08-16 19:53:23+00:00): Zie ook https://rotterdamonderweg.nl/veer-rozenburg-maassluis
A67-A67 (2023-08-17 04:30:28+00:00): Dit is een vreemde wijziging:
- bicycle:conditional=no @ wet ?
- disused:route=ferry toegevoegd zonder route=ferry te verwijderen
- toevoeging aan de concessie Personenvervoer over water Rotterdam-Drechtsteden ??
A67-A67 (2023-08-17 04:35:41+00:00): Ik heb de veerdienst weer opengezet voor fietsers en voetgangers, volgens de informatie van de provincie.

Ook heb ik de vreemde, foutieve informatie uit deze wijziging verwijderd.
Bruno1460 (2023-08-17 08:08:41+00:00): Beter als het terug open is. Ik had vorige week gekeken en niets gevonden over deze heropening.
eggie (2023-08-17 08:33:31+00:00): Hoi...  Ik twijfelde ook. Maar ik wist wel dat Damen het voorlopig op zich wilde nemen. Dat is kennelijk structureel geworden. Ook in de regio Drechtsteden zijn oplossingen gevonden voor het veerdienst debacle. 
Het veer Kop van het Land heeft zelfs ook even stil gelegen. 
Er werd zelf onder protest een knip gezet in m'n 10 vaartenkaart van de voorgaande 'operator'. 
Sinds de 14de aug is het fiets/voetveer weer in de vaart. Vers van de pers. Scheelt een hele omweg. 
Het Hoeksveer heb ik net ook weer aangepast. Die vaart nu van april tot oktober
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-08-17 08:43:31+00:00): Dit was het laaste bericht van Blue Amigo, maar dat heeft dus te maken met het autoveer. 
https://www.blueamigo.com/veerdienstrozenburgmaassluis/

Maar die route staat al een tijd op disused:route=ferry

Het ziet er niet naar uit dat het autoveer nog opengaat, maar misschien toch beter even wachten met verwijderen. Anders tekent een inwetende medemapper het veer weer in.
eggie (2023-08-16 20:13:06+00:00): Pad lijkt me oke... Evt toevoegen foot=yes en bicycle=yes
paving_stones ipv paved heeft de voorkeur. 

Van de parkeerplaats van de Aldi klopte echter niet zoveel... die bijdrage uit 2018 heb ik aangepast.
Het slingerhekje op het pad heb ik ook toegevoegd. 

MVG
eggie
wabozand (2023-08-18 13:52:08+00:00): Correction: Source used was Esri World Imagery; Mapillary.
baptistemm (2023-08-16 19:41:09+00:00): sorry, I forgot to push the previous change
MxxCon (2023-08-22 02:27:42+00:00): Hello.
Existing foot=no already indicates that pedestrians are not allowed there.
Having just access=no means NOBODY is allowed there, not even buses.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139981408
dieterdreist-CAI (2023-12-07 13:44:00+00:00): Hi saldenisov, I just noticed you created 4 versions of the Rebibbia prison with no indications from where you got the name and whether it is based on survey observation and reflected on the ground, but it seems to me, the current iteration for "name:it" is not suitable for the whole compound. I also question that "name" and "name:it" are different here, which language is "name" if not Italian?
Cheers,
Martin
user_5359 (2023-08-17 10:55:45+00:00): Hello! Please don’t use abbreviation for highway names. For details read https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Names#Abbreviation_.28don.27t_do_it.29
Javierpf (2023-08-16 21:02:46+00:00): Hello! Thank you for the updates.  your changeset crosses many countries.  Let reviewers and other mappers could check your edit easier.  it's impossible (almost) to keep track of the database and changes if changes in huge areas. Please retain your changeset smaller.
So I kindly ask you when you edit, retain your changeset in a particular smaller area -such as countries/provinces/municipality- save it first and then move to another area. Examples:
you are adding/modifying 10 objects in 2 distant cities => make 2 changesets, 1 per city.
you are adding/modifying 5 objects in 5 countries => make 5 changesets, 1 per country.
You'll find more information on the reason in this article: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
feolips (2023-08-17 16:23:14+00:00): Hello! I'll do that way from now on. I'm sorry for my mistake and thank you for your time and instruction.
Iron TUX (2023-08-17 10:04:22+00:00): Résolution du problème de la bande cyclable sur l'Avenue de Royallieu qui autorise les bicyclettes à remonter à contre-sens :
- cycleway=opposite
- oneway:bicycle=no
- cycleway:left=opposite
- cycleway:right=no
literan (2023-08-17 06:31:18+00:00): я бы и сам их поправил, но просто не знал, как они тут сейчас крутятся
CurlingMan13 (2023-08-16 21:37:17+00:00): Individual tree canopies should not be be mapped as woods.  You apparently mapped them as rough?

They should be mapped in accordance with:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dtree

I have gone ahead and cleaned it up.
skfd (2023-08-17 06:28:16+00:00): hi! you can set wikipedia links for artworks and other things in iD editor! Add it for this one
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139984324