piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
MK 1 (2025-12-12 17:57:14+00:00): Situation on the ground says another. Then I shoud mark them according to the road signs.
And also, regional roads are marked just with numbers. Without R in the ref. So should I change that too?
Branches will be marked different from the main route. On the milestones are marked as A*m/A*e.
So?
Until it is defined how to label the branches, this classification is good. Or without the decimal, A10, A30, A31. Naturally, the description should state that it is a branch.
HurricaneGator (2025-12-15 22:11:21+00:00): Hello MK 1, thank you for the response. Generally, it is best to tag features as they appear on signs. Are you aware of any street-level imagery (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Street-level_imagery_services) or government resources that verify these unique ref values? For example, Mapillary from July 2025 (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=2299428057138855) confirms the A1 ref value near (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1352503199).
MK 1 (2025-12-18 14:39:41+00:00): Milestones says A1e. Road signs says A1 in blue. A1 in green is other route. 
This is because our government makes mistakes about new renumerations. Old numeration was fine. Now this is a mess. Will be A3.1 wil be restored as A3, and A1.1 will be restored to A1. 
Regional roads will be without R, because that is on the road signs.
HurricaneGator (2025-12-18 21:03:07+00:00): Thank you!
Gustavo22Soares (2025-12-04 11:41:53+00:00): Thank you for correcting it. I’ve already updated the data in the MapRoulette task.
eggie (2025-12-02 19:30:49+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback. Je info heb ik samengevoegd met de adresnode.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-12-02 19:33:19+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-12-02 19:55:41+00:00): Dag donux. Lijkt me correct zo.
MVG
eggie
tkk (2025-12-04 07:15:27+00:00): Ahoj, jen drobnost, ref u rozcestniku je bez pismene na konci - pismeno urcuje konkretni cedulku, ref rozcestniku jako takoveho tedy neni SO132f ale jen SO132. Diky Tom.K
vipas (2025-12-04 19:04:26+00:00): Děkuji za odezvu a opravu.
vipas
German C (2025-12-03 02:17:15+00:00): Hola Lolj, ¿por qué esta eliminando esta área de bosque? (https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=175416841)
German C (2025-12-03 02:12:59+00:00): Hola Lolj, ¿Por que estas eliminando esta area de bosqué?
MarkoŠatrak (2025-12-03 11:40:04+00:00): Reverted because a traffic sign which is mandatory was not found in integrated street imagery #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175442896
MarkoŠatrak (2025-12-03 11:54:58+00:00): Reverted because a traffic sign which is mandatory was not found in integrated street imagery #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175443378
kgm123 (2025-12-04 07:02:39+00:00): C.Ayral Diye Bir Bulvar ismi yok.
eggie (2025-12-03 13:28:29+00:00): Dag number,
De looproute heb ik aangepast naar pedestrian.

MVG
eggie
number975312468 (2025-12-03 22:02:48+00:00): Thanks a lot. When will I see this affecting calculation of walking distance from olmenlaan 1185kh to brede school rembrandt?

2, Meester P.J.M. Aalberselaan, Amstelveen, North Holland, Netherlands, 1181 XJ, Netherlands
eggie (2025-12-03 22:11:27+00:00): Nearly a week with grasshopper. Other routers will take more time.
The may make a route with openstreetmap.org. ..the arrow in the left uppercorner.
eggie (2025-12-03 22:14:03+00:00): The router will open after selecting the three stripes upper right and than the arrow.
Select router GraphHopper and by foot.
eggie (2025-12-03 22:15:28+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_foot&route=52.303621%2C4.857025%3B52.303919%2C4.858393#map=18/52.303735/4.857701&layers=N
eggie (2025-12-03 22:16:55+00:00): Check sat or sunday.. maybe later
MarkoŠatrak (2025-12-03 08:19:43+00:00): Change undone in a later changeset #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175417370
Baloo Uriza (2025-12-02 20:27:26+00:00): Is the Ponca Community Center a funeral hall or something else?  Not sure if new building or building recently destroyed based on aerials.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175417427
meagullseagull (2025-12-02 21:00:47+00:00): The newly constructed building (behind tribal affairs building) was originally intended to serve only as a bereavement center, but it is now also rented out for events such as birthdays, graduations, and weddings in addition to funeral services. The Community Center functions as a smaller event space, while the Cultural Center is a larger, gymnasium-style venue designed for bigger gatherings.

Hope this helps. :)
MarkoŠatrak (2025-12-02 22:57:22+00:00): Fixed missing tags caused by another team member. Fixes in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175422878
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-23 06:33:07+00:00): Reverted adding POI tags with a source=* of Google Maps, which is prohibited by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ), in changeset 184460725

https://osm.org/changeset/184460725
German C (2025-12-03 02:03:44+00:00): Hola Lolj,  ¿por qué borraste los edificios? https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=175417735
t_ja (2025-12-02 20:30:55+00:00): Ahoj,
z akého dôvodu si zmazal celý plot od Argi Academy až popri skládke odpadu (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1106138407/history)? Na Ortofoto je jasne vidieť, že plot existuje, a stačilo upraviť len tú časť, kde je teraz postavené parkovisko...
Taktiež je nezmyselné dávať na značky v jednosmerke "direction=forward", pretože nikdy nemôže byť iná hodnota...

T.
aceman444 (2026-04-14 11:12:42+00:00): Vidim, ze ani Vam tento chlapik neodpoveda. Ani na anglictinu, ked uz ma v takom jazyku iD.
MarkoŠatrak (2025-12-02 23:00:55+00:00): Fixed tags missed by a team member Fixes in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175423140
Jackson Johnson (2026-07-23 13:28:21+00:00): Wow ..... something controlled by the Davenports .......  Hmmmmmm
delineatorix (2025-12-04 18:53:36+00:00): Hallo geowas,
ich denke, place=locality ist hier aus verschiedenen Gründen falsch. Zum einen handelt es sich bei der Kunstinstallation um keine Örtlichkeit im Sinne der tag-Definition. Zum anderen existiert der in der Installation benannte Platz hier nicht — es ist schlicht nur der Name des Gesamtinstallation, das muss nicht als eigener Punkt getaggt sein.
Schöne Grüße, midor
ika-chan! (2025-12-02 21:06:54+00:00): Hello, the 1963 decree states that the southern end of the EO5 starts in Rio. I think this is still the case because the ferry still runs for traffic not allowed on the bridge.

I wish to ask what motivated you to cut the southern end of the EO5 back to Antirrio. I think ferries can be part of a national road (since it was the only route between Rio and Antirrio before the bridge opened), but I am open to alternatives to ref=* on the ferry route.
ika-chan! (2025-12-02 21:08:13+00:00): Oh sorry, I missed the forum message! My workflow seems to be out of order today.
NeisBot (2025-12-13 22:11:02+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Siding contractor in Ashland VA"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-12-13 22:33:47+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/175434554
MarkoŠatrak (2025-12-02 23:05:21+00:00): Reverted because of a wrong tag used and also the restriction was not confirmed by a road sign #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175423262
osmviborg (2025-12-03 07:25:14+00:00): Når du bruger 'access:conditional', skal du ikke samtidig tagge vejen som værende under 'construction', så forsvinder formålet med 'conditional'. Rettet.
Marek-M (2025-12-02 22:17:11+00:00): Takie miejsce nie jest szpitalem. Tutaj bardziej pasuje szablon przychodni (`amenity=doctors`)
Marek-M (2025-12-02 22:16:47+00:00): Takie miejsce nie jest szpitalem. Tutaj bardziej pasuje szablon przychodni (`amenity=doctors`)
349179440 (2025-12-04 00:31:19+00:00): what was the name of this node?
user_18023081 (2025-12-04 15:39:18+00:00): you should know since YOU added it 🙃
LordGarySugar (2025-12-04 15:42:29+00:00): "If anyone finds this, idk" - if you select the deleted node on this changeset you can view its history
349179440 (2025-12-04 16:37:03+00:00): ohhhhh I was trying to test something, I did not mean for it to get published
AndresDuhour (2026-03-20 10:35:46+00:00): Hola! Estoy revisando etiquetas de acceso en distintos lugares y en el puente monteagudo se ve en la foto (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=820189932252647) que tiene veredas peatonales, por lo que la vía del puente no debería tener la etiqueta foot=no. 
Por otro lado veo que le has cambiado el material de la superfice de hormigón (concrete) a "paved", esto no está bien, ya que esta categoría debe usarse si no se conoce qué material tiene la calzada. En este caso ya estaba mapeada como de hormigón. Espero que podamos dialogar estos temas para seguir mejorando el mapa. Saludos!
Andrés
hoserab (2025-12-02 23:47:58+00:00): Hello duckman, and welcome to OSM. :)

Your edits look perfectly fine to me, except a small formatting quibble: postal codes have a space in them. 	Should be `addr:postcode=T3B 5K1`, instead of `T3B5K1`.
Adam Dunn (2025-12-03 23:05:15+00:00): Welcome DuckMan2!
Just another minor thing: you missed the + at the start of the phone number for Little Ceasars. You did it correctly for 13th Floor Cannabis, so it was obviously just a minor oversight.
Thanks for the great contribution, and keep up the good work!
MarkoŠatrak (2025-12-03 12:03:16+00:00): Revering maxspeed tag since not confirmed by a proper sign and not currently in the scope of the project #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175443671
MarkoŠatrak (2025-12-03 12:04:01+00:00): Reverting maxspeed tag since not confirmed by a proper sign and not currently in the scope of the project #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175443719
349179440 (2025-12-04 00:30:32+00:00): thanks for fixing it!
PizzaTreeIsland (2025-12-02 22:29:18+00:00): Hello, 
I see that you requested a review. Your changes were very good. One additional tip for mapping houses is making all the corners rectangular. In the iD editor (the one you used), you can do that by selecting a house and hitting Q on your keyboard. 
Thanks and happy mapping!
user_5359 (2025-12-03 08:11:24+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Did you see the https://www.osm.org/note/5076700?
Taya_S (2025-12-10 13:25:07+00:00): OpenStreetMap is not intended to be used to map fantasy project. Please tell your classroom to cease using OpenStreetMap for its dam projects. 

The edits that have been peformed by your group in this area recently have been destructive as they were of very low quality and did not align with reality.

Furthermore the notes left behind in this area have been nothing but meaningless spam. Notes are intended to give feedback to other mappers about missing or outdated features. They are not intended to be used for classroom projects.
Bartek444 (2025-12-06 21:57:05+00:00): Droga miedzy domami, nie jest drogą w pole, ani nie jest w lesie
Lishoo (2025-12-07 13:33:59+00:00): Tam nie ma drogi, leży kupa sniegu, przejazd możliwy latem po trawie, to nie droga polna?
Bartek444 (2025-12-07 13:37:19+00:00): to trzeba zmienić nawierzchnię
Lishoo (2025-12-07 13:40:54+00:00): Nawigacja kieruje tamtędy, chociaż kiedy tam byłem nie był możliwy przejazd (30 cm śniegu) droga mieszkaniowa była by odśnieżona, moim zdaniem droga polna to dobre określenie tej drogi.
Bartek444 (2025-12-07 13:49:22+00:00): odśnieżanie nie ma tu nic do rzeczy, 
opis drogi polnej:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:highway=track?uselang=pl
zmieniłem te 2 odcinki na highway=service
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:highway=service?uselang=pl
według map geodezyjnych jest w tym miejscu żwir, jak byłeś na miejscu i widziałeś tylko trawa=ę to proszę zmień. 
Nawigacja to jest kolejny problem. To ona powinna dostosować się do danych, a nie zmieniać dane, aby nawigacja inaczej prowadziła.
Lishoo (2025-12-07 14:25:50+00:00): Jak byłem ostatnio to leżał tylko śnieg, ale faktycznie kiedy byłem miesiąc wcześniej to był tam wysypany żwir. Tag service będzie dobrym wyborem. Pozdrawiam.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-04 06:35:39+00:00): Hello!

You used
bicycle=yes~
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6304118379/history

Have you maybe meant
bicycle=yes
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
atticquilt (2026-02-04 14:57:07+00:00): Thanks for the heads up. I fixed it.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-05 08:26:06+00:00): Thanks for a fix! And for your mapping in general!
atticquilt (2026-02-05 15:24:32+00:00): Sure! It's a pleasure.
Baloo Uriza (2025-12-03 14:57:24+00:00): This looks to be about 1 lane into the northeast corner of a large intersection.  Could you describe the location of the camera so we could more accurately position it on the map?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175423428
Baloo Uriza (2025-12-03 14:58:19+00:00): This appears to be between the two eastbound lanes of the street, centered in front of a driveway.  Could you provide additional information that could help us position this more accurately?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175423488
rskedgell (2025-12-03 00:11:35+00:00): You inadvertently dragged a section of Campion Grange, which is why the editor displayed so many warnings.

Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175424400
user_5359 (2025-12-03 08:09:10+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't add any shop as landuse and name. Please paint the building and add the shop (with additional description) as node.
PostaMap_Infinite (2026-05-10 09:10:34+00:00): Hello Ironfractal! I have made some changes to the retail area you have edited to better match OSM best practices. My changeset was https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182456352#map=17/29.802159/-98.417823 . Please let me know if you have any questions!
PostaMap_Infinite (2026-05-10 09:15:21+00:00): As a quick note: you can square buildings in the ID editor by pressing Q while an area is selected. I would highly recommend you square buildings you add, as it improves the quality of the map data and makes it better represent reality! While things like these may seem unimportant, our goal of making a holistic, accurate representation of the world relies on ensuring that the little details don't remain unaccounted for.
willkmis (2025-12-08 02:09:01+00:00): I'm not really sure I buy Rosecrans/Lytton/Barnett as a trunk, what important destinations do they lead to?
Yushclay (2025-12-08 03:47:06+00:00): From the direction of the I-5 hey lead to military bases Marine Corps Recruit Depot and Naval Base Point Loma. It also leads to the tourist destination Liberty Station. The corridor may also be used by students and faculty of Point Loma Nazarene University.
willkmis (2025-12-09 02:57:09+00:00): Yes, but none of those seem to me to be population centers of regional importance, nor are these roads part of a network of expressways, so I don't really think they meet the criteria of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States/2021_Highway_Classification_Guidance#Trunk. I'd say that in other parts of CA and the US, roads connecting freeways to colleges, retail districts, and midsize military facilities are typically highway=primary.
hvalentim (2025-12-03 15:04:18+00:00): Criou múltiplas rotundas (mini_roundabout). Uniu a estrada ao cabo elétrico. Parece estar desalinhado (qual a fonte de imagem aérea usada?). Por favor reveja.
DrF_Master7 (2025-12-03 19:31:49+00:00): Correto. Eu no meio das alterações que estava a fazer para as linhas de autocarro, acabei por mexer na rotunda sem perceber os erros que tinha cometido com esta. Em princípio já estarão corrigidos, com a própria rotunda seguindo o formato a partir de uma vista de olhos que tinha sido feita no terreno.
hvalentim (2025-12-05 15:44:44+00:00): A rotunda já surge na Esri World Imagery. Existe um offset de cerca de 8m.
권윤성 (2025-12-03 00:33:36+00:00): 대한민국 관계기관 연계후 항공지도 삭제요청예정
권윤성 (2025-12-03 00:41:49+00:00): The information I deleted pertains to facilities regulated as secure facilities under South Korean law that are displayed on the map. The disclosure of information such as addresses and routes to civilians is considered illegal in the country to which these facilities belong, so I have deleted it. Please take note of this.
KennyDap (2025-12-03 01:52:12+00:00): Fix vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175425846
Fizzie-DWG (2025-12-03 02:29:45+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19080
Taya_S (2025-12-10 13:25:02+00:00): OpenStreetMap is not intended to be used to map fantasy project. Please tell your classroom to cease using OpenStreetMap for its dam projects. 

The edits that have been peformed by your group in this area recently have been destructive as they were of very low quality and did not align with reality.

Furthermore the notes left behind in this area have been nothing but meaningless spam. Notes are intended to give feedback to other mappers about missing or outdated features. They are not intended to be used for classroom projects.
Vonter (2025-12-03 05:39:09+00:00): Hello!

While the crossover track is not shown in the linked alignment image, it does indeed exist and is used for transferring trains between the Green Line and Purple Line. Whenever a Green Line train appears on the Purple Line, it gets on to the Purple Line using this crossover track.

I have reverted this changeset and added back the crossover track.

Regards,
Vonter
arjunaraoc (2025-12-03 15:09:36+00:00): I think that a green train entering purple line or vice versa is not going to happen, as they are at different levels. I feel this segment may be useful for shorting the route at Majestic which they do when there is lot of rush or some technical problem on a segment. In that case there should be connection to both tracks at the same level with the crossover. As KSRTC is building big tower on the returned land, the segment also can't lie in that area. If you have some solid evidence, it is ok to keep  /corect that segment.
권윤성 (2025-12-03 00:49:42+00:00): the information I deleted pertains to facilities regulated as secure facilities under South Korean law that are displayed on the map. The disclosure of information such as addresses and routes to civilians is considered illegal in the country to which these facilities belong, so I have deleted it. Please take note of this.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-07 04:06:55+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/223457489/history - are you sure about that house number 000 ?

Or have you added something else and it got mangled by editor?

( spotted via https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete/issues/6640 )
westnordost (2025-12-07 14:06:20+00:00): half of the city seems to be tagged now with house number 000 or "inconnu"
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-05-29 11:37:43+00:00): reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183350734
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-05-29 11:43:42+00:00): and I continue reverting
권윤성 (2025-12-03 00:49:37+00:00): the information I deleted pertains to facilities regulated as secure facilities under South Korean law that are displayed on the map. The disclosure of information such as addresses and routes to civilians is considered illegal in the country to which these facilities belong, so I have deleted it. Please take note of this.
KennyDap (2025-12-03 01:57:03+00:00): Fix vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175425910
NeisBot (2025-12-03 00:36:12+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your changesets and noticed that the cumulative count of your recent edits (4 changesets) shows that 306 of your last 320 changes were deletions. This is quite an unusual proportion, so I wanted to check with you.

Could you please confirm whether these deletions were intentional or if they may have occurred by mistake?

#DeletionsCheck #Cumulative
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?uid=23571927
권윤성 (2025-12-03 00:41:05+00:00): Hello, the information I deleted pertains to facilities regulated as secure facilities under South Korean law that are displayed on the map. The disclosure of information such as addresses and routes to civilians is considered illegal in the country to which these facilities belong, so I have deleted it. Please take note of this. Have a nice day.
KennyDap (2025-12-03 01:56:39+00:00): Fix vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175425907
권윤성 (2025-12-03 02:12:49+00:00): Correcting information that is prohibited from being disclosed by the country of affiliation merely involves rectifying it, and such information should not be disclosed for national security reasons. Since the person registering the information has violated laws related to the facility, it cannot be corrected.
권윤성 (2025-12-03 02:15:34+00:00): If serious issues arise in a country due to unauthorized satellite photography and the disclosure of information by certain users, who would be held responsible? Are protective measures for national security facilities aware of the prohibitions on disclosure and are they claiming to fix vandalism? Are they arguing that detailed information about nationally managed facilities around the world (such as the White House) should all be publicly available on OSM?
권윤성 (2025-12-03 02:18:47+00:00): I checked your profile and it appears you are from Russia. In Russia, is it allowed for the entire world to access information about such nationally important facilities? If freedom for photographing and registering information about security facilities is guaranteed on OSM, noticing this and handling security information would also be the user's choice. Who has the right to classify the act of correcting information to mitigate legal responsibility before legal liability is raised by the country to which the facility belongs as vandalism?
Fizzie-DWG (2025-12-03 02:27:11+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19079
권윤성 (2025-12-03 00:49:30+00:00): the information I deleted pertains to facilities regulated as secure facilities under South Korean law that are displayed on the map. The disclosure of information such as addresses and routes to civilians is considered illegal in the country to which these facilities belong, so I have deleted it. Please take note of this.
KennyDap (2025-12-03 01:56:00+00:00): Fix vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175425899
CRCulver (2025-12-07 17:08:30+00:00): Why did you remove the border-control name= tags from this node? 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2063357044
CRCulver (2025-12-11 09:39:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by changeset 175793701.

Please respond to changeset comments in order to remain a good-faith member of the community.
MoG (2025-12-03 01:06:34+00:00): Comment effacer ce groupe de modifications ?
MoG (2025-12-03 16:22:43+00:00): Corrigé!
Je me suis servi du plugin Achavi sur Firefox
mueschel (2025-12-04 09:23:09+00:00): If you wanted to delete these edits, it didn't work. The data is still there. 
Let me know if you need help!
MoG (2025-12-04 14:45:24+00:00): Now Its done. I do it by Reverter Plugin in JOSM. Is it a good method ?
mueschel (2025-12-04 15:01:03+00:00): Yes, this seems to have worked as intended.