piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
streckenkundler (2024-12-30 16:17:00+00:00): Hallo Chriss...
Ich hatte die leise Hoffnung, daß sich kaum einer für den Cottbuser Ostsee interessiert... Ich hatte im Februar diesen Jahres die 60,2m-Wasserlinie eingepflegt, nun den Endwasserstand 62,5m. 
CS: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147233572

Beschrieben hatte ich es hier: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/nutzung-von-sentinel-daten-cottbuser-ostsee/109070/13 . Das Tranitzer Haff hatte ich da extra noch weggelassen...

Du kannst ja mal schauen, im es so passt... Ich hab versucht soviel wie möglich Geometrien und Historien zu erhalten, was bei solchem großen Objekt irgendwann schwierig wird.

Der Cottbuser Ostsee umfasst alles, Das Tranitzer Haff und die Lieskower Bucht sind extra-Objekte als natural=bay

Danke,

Sven
ChrissW-R1 (2025-01-02 00:28:16+00:00): Da du wesentlich näher dran bist als ich vertraue ich dir da voll und ganz. Ich sehe da zumindest jetzt nichts, was für mich eindeutig falsch oder ungenau wäre. Danke dir.
best_pancake (2024-10-18 18:27:54+00:00): Tagged as camp_site to ensure rendering on hiking apps. Prevents trampling of meadows as hikers look for sites.
une abeille (2024-10-23 21:51:25+00:00): This changeset duplicated Rue Guy... reverting.
best_pancake (2024-10-18 18:25:23+00:00): Tagged as camp_site to ensure rendering on hiking apps. Prevents trampling of meadows as hikers look for sites.
dval (2024-10-18 18:06:23+00:00): Не по домам. На Фонтанной площади вы создали мультиполигон. В ОСМ в браузере она, площадь, никак не отражается, как если бы мп не было, хотя находится поиском и есть в приложении на моем смарте. Но для поиска, пожалуй, было бы достаточно одной точки посередине площади где-то в районе самого фонтана. Или есть еще какие-то доводы в пользу мп? Далее: вы создаете мп из нескольких антэ, расположенных в разных местах, например, газоны. Какой смысл в этом, когда газоны можно с тем же успехом оставить сами по себе? Или уж если идти на принцип, то почему не объединить все газоны города в один мп?
dval (2024-10-18 18:11:01+00:00): Далее. Вы нарисовали резиденшиал зону (там, где магазины Вагран и Тандем) так, что она имеет общие точки со зданиями. Какой смысл плодить лишние данные и затруднять последующую работу с объектами? Каждый, конечно, может рисовать как ему вздумается, но культура рисования все-таки, думаю, имеет значение.
dval (2024-10-18 18:18:59+00:00): Еще. Когда вы рисуете объекты, где есть окружности или их части, как, например, в школе 23, полезно использовать инструменты, имеющиеся в JOSM. В нем можно создать окружность и разделить ее таким образом, чтобы получить, линию с двумя полудугами и прямыми между ними. Возможно, это можно сделать и в айди. Если вам по душе рисовать объекты в городе, то стоит рисовать красиво, а не как попало.
Qwajo OSM (2024-10-29 11:03:03+00:00): Hello, kindly avoid mapping buildings with shared nodes. Thats data quality issue. Hold down 'Control' key to avoid nodes merging with each other. Thank you and keep mapping.
best_pancake (2024-10-18 18:28:37+00:00): Tagged as camp_site to ensure rendering on hiking apps. Prevents trampling of meadows as hikers look for sites.
best_pancake (2024-10-18 18:28:23+00:00): Tagged as camp_site to ensure rendering on hiking apps. Prevents trampling of meadows as hikers look for sites.
best_pancake (2024-10-18 18:28:12+00:00): Tagged as camp_site to ensure rendering on hiking apps. Prevents trampling of meadows as hikers look for sites.
Road–Runner (2024-10-19 21:47:24+00:00): Auch hier wieder einige Fehler. Das Problem ist, dass du bestehende, korrekte Daten umänderst und damit verfälscht. 

Ein Friedenskreuz kann nicht gleichzeitig Wegkreuz sein; Fußgängerzonen müssen verbunden werden, die Grundrisse stimmen nicht, ditch nur für künstliche Wassergräben...

Es ist ja nicht so, dass du noch Anfänger bist. Warum schaust du dir nicht das Wiki an wenn du unsicher bist?
EinEngener (2024-10-23 17:53:18+00:00): Ich werde noch mehr achten darauf, bestehendes nicht zu ändern. Ich bin schon ordentlicher geworden und ändere hier nur noch von mir festgehaltenes Material ...
Road–Runner (2024-10-23 23:44:06+00:00): Du kannst gerne so viele Dinge hinzufügen und ändern wie du willst. Aber wie gesagt, lies einfach das Wiki kurz durch bevor du ein neues Attribut setzt oder frage nach wenn du Hilfe brauchst. Dadurch kann man die meisten Fehler vermeiden.

Vielleicht wäre doch eher der iD Editor besser für dich geeignet? Der arbeitetet mehr mit Vorlagen und weist besser auf Fehler hin.
best_pancake (2024-10-18 18:28:50+00:00): Tagged as camp_site to ensure rendering on hiking apps. Prevents trampling of meadows as hikers look for sites.
Robert Whittaker (2024-10-30 09:26:57+00:00): In this changeset, it looks like you deleted two ways that record the official Definitive Line of some Public Rights of Way:
* https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/653959382
* https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/653959383

While these routes aren't physically present on the ground, it is useful for them to be recorded in OSM, to show where the official route that people are legally permitted to use goes, and that this route has been checked an found not to be present on the ground. It also helps avoid other mappers accidentally recording the physical route on the ground as a Public Right of Way.

I've therefore re-added the two ways above.
NeisBot (2024-10-17 22:42:18+00:00): Ooops, it seems that some of your names are a bit unusual ...

Amount>=1
#NeisLab #Minutely #Naming
pitscheplatsch (2024-10-18 05:34:04+00:00): Hi Ptheunknown, welcome to OSM.

Thanks for your map edits, looks good!

#HappyMapping
AgusQui (2024-10-22 03:28:40+00:00): La calle Carlos Calvo, entre Boedo y Huergo se llama "Carlos Calvo", ni "Calle Carlos Calvo" ni "Avenida Carlos Calvo"
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:16:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
Frans S (2024-10-22 13:11:04+00:00): Hello. You tag clusters of buildings wrongly.
Don't tag an amenity as a building.
You create buildings inside buildings. These  are errors and need to be corrected. 
Best regards
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:13:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
Herrieman (2026-06-02 08:28:15+00:00): Hoi, ik wilde het Veiligheidsinstituut hier taggen, maar zag dat er al een bedrijf door jou getagd was. Ik kan daar echter niks van vinden dat dat hier zou zitten. Op straatbeelden zie ik het ook niet. Daarom ga ik het vervangen. Mocht ik toch iets gemist hebben, let me know!
Herrieman (2026-06-02 08:28:50+00:00): Het gaat om Storkstraat 6, vergeten te melden...
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:15:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:14:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
Frans S (2024-10-22 13:31:32+00:00): Please do not cluster buildings and call it 1 building. 
Each building need to be mapped individually , accurate and squared. 
Don't connect objects with their nodes as well
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158029270
acarasimon96 (2024-10-21 22:43:51+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158189955
DaveF (2024-10-19 13:18:42+00:00): Hi
All railway=station in Britain are mapped. Please don't add duplications.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/134679224#map=19/55.871115/-4.269206
Frans S (2024-10-22 13:28:18+00:00): Please map buildings accurate and squared. don't give silly names and do not cluster a few buildings with a building tag residential.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158029607
rab (2024-10-22 20:43:08+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name?uselang=en

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Limitations_on_mapping_private_information
Frans S (2024-10-22 13:22:54+00:00): Please don't waste your time on these nonsense.
Mapping for humanitarian goals is a serious business. 
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158029622
Frans S (2024-10-22 13:20:54+00:00): Hello. What are you doing here. 
Mapping a tunnel ? 
this is not a game play where you can mess around
Keep it serious !
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158029652
Frans S (2024-10-22 12:56:42+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
Issues found on your mappings

A: Inaccurate mapping.
E: Buildings not squared.


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158029814
Frans S (2024-10-22 13:20:10+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please improve your mapping skills.  Your mappings are far below par.
Not squared, inaccurate mapped.

You are mapping indistinct objects like ruins. These kinds of objects in agricultural environments do not need to be mapped. I remove them.
Also, very small buildings without clear paths to them in agricultural plots don't need to be mapped
You make strange choices when tagging roads in agricultural landscape. A track in the middle of some fields you have tagged as being a ‘secondary highway’ i.e. an important connecting road between towns.
Make sure you understand the tagging of roads in this project. Please consult this wiki. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India/Tags/Highway#Local_Roads

Mapping and tagging tracks in agricultural areas, access only, is not requested. Only roads that have a thorough nature should be mapped.
Also, you tag an intersection of tracks as a mini roundabout. Not required. Just tag the node.
I will comment on other changesets as well.
Best regards
cc @rab
Frans S (2024-10-22 13:14:50+00:00): Hello. The highways you mapped here, except for the one to the waterway in the north are not required. I removed them
Don't tag highways here as residential or unclassified (inbetween agricultural plots.
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158030257
matix849 (2024-10-18 14:05:31+00:00): Gdzie na stronie DSDiK jest info, że ten odcinek ma taki numer?
pavvv (2024-10-18 16:04:44+00:00): Droga oficjalnie nie ma numeru. Wycofałem.

Przy okazji droga straciła status drogi krajowej, więc przede wszystkim należy zamienić wartość highway:category:pl na 2. A numer drogi powinno się sprawdzić, czy został zmieniony w terenie.
Frans S (2024-10-22 13:09:22+00:00): You mapped here a rural area as a residential area.
Only places with houses build on might be mapped with a residential land use tag. Keep a minimum of 4 buildings as smallest residential landuse/
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158031103
pantufla (2024-10-23 14:26:07+00:00): Hello, this bridge collapsed about a year ago. Are you sure it's now functioning?
ArcticDesert (2024-10-24 06:07:47+00:00): Hello pantufla, after reviewing this area, I am less certain now whether this bridge is open to vehicles. I will defer to the previous classification for that bridge feature.
pantufla (2024-10-24 08:59:33+00:00): Do you have access to anonymous driving data of any source?
ArcticDesert (2024-10-25 19:22:29+00:00): Hello, pantufla! I saw that there were a strong collection of Strava traces going over the bridge so I assumed it was open and fully functioning, but now I'm thinking those traces might have been old, or maybe only bicycles are crossing currently. Strava Heatmap is available as a plugin for JOSM (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Strava#Global_Heatmap). Our team also sometimes uses OpenStreetMap GPS Traces although those tend to be less accurate in my experience.

Thanks for updating the bridge with your local knowledge of the area! If you do hear that the bridge is open again for cars, it would be a great benefit to the map if you could change the classification and note tag. Thanks again for the info and have a good day!
pantufla (2024-10-28 17:23:05+00:00): I was doing some research on the internet and it seems it's operational now. So I've updated it again. I'm thankful for your feedback. Happy mapping!
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-08 03:53:07+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164659189
Allison P (2024-10-18 19:51:21+00:00): I don't think it's appropriate to tag the gas station with an address, since it does not have its own.
Herman Lee (2024-10-18 06:54:32+00:00): 该修改集已退回，改回名称扶港路西闸公路并修复关系
SWB6108BEV90G (2024-10-18 07:32:34+00:00): 想知道贵站的修改标准上什么，该站于2018年就开始使用“西渡卫生服务中心”站名，经过该站的任意一条线路站点名称都不是“扶港路西闸公路”。烦请给予答复
Herman Lee (2024-10-21 10:15:26+00:00): 看到的公开资料和实地媒体资料中表明，此站点存在有扶港路西闸公路之双路名站名，公交西渡站有标注该站名名称，在其他名称和多种双路名站名共存时，优先使用更少歧义的双路名站名，其余的可放在alt_name中。如果对公共交通感兴趣可以加入tg群或QQ810826702进一步讨论。
felipeeugenio (2024-10-18 12:48:36+00:00): Eliminado
hatul (2024-12-21 21:40:47+00:00): הדרך לכאן לא ממוקשת?
zstadler (2024-12-21 21:48:07+00:00): לא
hatul (2024-12-21 21:51:04+00:00): במפה מסומן שכן, יש דרך לתקן?
zstadler (2024-12-21 22:24:45+00:00): שטחי המיקוש אינם חלק מ 
OSM.
 אני מציע שנמשיך את הדיון במקום אחר
fs_LT (2026-01-29 13:26:07+00:00): Was sind das für "seltsame" Bearbeitungen quer durchs Land? überall Apartments hinzugefügt die es nicht gibt, falsche Adressen usw. Was ist die Quelle?
fs_LT (2026-05-29 05:17:07+00:00): keine Quelle und wohl aus irgendeiner Datenquelle; kein vollständiges Tagging; bin gerade beim Aufräumen
opendcc (2024-10-18 08:36:25+00:00): Nochmal nachgefragt: steht da ein Verkehrsschild (z.B. DE:240), was den Weg als benutzungpflichtig ausweist? Siehe auch http://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/ und https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen_kartieren
InnBiker (2024-10-18 08:46:34+00:00): Verkehrsschilder sind keine angebracht.
Der Weg läuft unmittelbar parallel zur Kreisstraße, hat eine Breite von ca. 2,5 Metern, keine Sperrpfosten etc. an den Einfahrten, könnte also auch von landw. Fahrzeugen genutzt werden.
Eine Beschilderung ist (in beiden Richtungen) jedoch nicht vorhanden.
Fischkopp0815 (2024-10-18 09:51:02+00:00): Stimmt! Das sind abgerissene Gebäude und sie waren auch so eingetragen. Du hast sie wieder auf vorhanden gesetzt. Ich habe sie wieder abgerissen und die Fläche zu Baustelle gemacht.
Travelfreund (2024-10-19 13:58:50+00:00): Hallo Fischkopp, ich hatte die Gebäude wieder eingetragen, aber als abgerissen definiert, da die Umrisse keine Adressen, sondern Häusern galten. Das mache ich so, wenn sie noch auf dem Satellitenbild sind. Ist auch so empfohlen. Die Fläche wollte ich auch noch zur Baustelle machen, musste aber noch die Grenzen anschauen - inzwischen hast Du das ja erledigt. Natürlich geht Deine Variante mit Fläche statt Häusern auch, deshalb lasse ich es jetzt so. Schöne Grüße, Travelfreund
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-10 13:54:12+00:00): Removed tags incorrectly merged to house for SEO spam POI "Handyman Zack" conflated with single family house with no visitable POI on the ground in changeset 183925518

https://osm.org/changeset/183925518
eggie (2024-10-18 06:28:47+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-10-18 06:58:09+00:00): De regel name=Bench heb ik verwijderd. Dat hoort niet op de kaart thuis.
Mapse
eggie
eggie (2024-10-18 06:26:36+00:00): Beste Neon,

Svp niet de name= tag gebruiken om iets te beschrijven.
Dus geen name=Bench of bankje.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=158034222
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-10-18 06:20:40+00:00): Dag KJ,

Dit heb ik deels teruggedraaid. Hoe kun je anders nr 56 bereiken. Ook loopt er een pad achter de woningen langs met een verbinding met de aftakking Danslaan. 
De bebording bestaat pas na de aansluiting van het achterpad. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-10-18 06:25:14+00:00): https://smoothefiets.ddns.net/html/verkeersbordenkaart/index.php?lat=52.368641139&lng=5.256775618&z=19
KJ77777 (2024-10-18 06:56:37+00:00): Dank voor het meekijken. Viel me vanmorgen pas op dat het bord inderdaad verder staat. Door het gedrag van de autos daar (hard rijden) lijkt het niet toegankelijk voor voetgangers. Maar officieel mag het blijkbaar wel.
eggie (2024-10-18 07:04:16+00:00): Hoi  Formeel is het zo dat op het moment dat een wweg aftakt van de rotonde het fiets- en voetgangersverbod al niet meer geldt.
Maar dat ga ik niet veranderen, want dat heeft geen consequenties hier.. behalve dan weer vanaf het olifantenpaadje richting Danslaan 47.
Dus daar 'moet' de fiets- en voetganger routering weer werken. 

Ook mag je op veel wegen in de berm lopen... daarom ben ik voorzichting met foot=no. 
Op de Hagevoortsdreef mag je inderdaad niet fietsen en wandelen. 
Daar 'moet' ik met mijn s-pedelec dan weer wel overheen, want ik mag niet over de fietspaden. Dit tot irritatie van automobilisten. 

Mapse,
eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:24:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:22:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:14:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:11:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-18 04:53:31+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165095630
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:11:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:20:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:18:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:21:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:11:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-10-24 03:10:15+00:00): Not a building
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158035325
fortera_au (2024-10-18 06:18:23+00:00): Hi, this area has recently had changes that likely aren't reflected on Bing, especially around the rails themselves, if you're not using up to date imagery (as in the last couple of months) this has likely undone some recent changes to map that new work.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158035446
Supt_of_Printing (2024-10-18 06:29:31+00:00): I was cross-checking Bing with Esri (which is usually more recent), and Mapbox, along with Google and street view. If it has changed since all of these I couldn't find it. Apologies if I'm wrong.
fortera_au (2024-10-18 06:39:59+00:00): I'm hoping Esri has most of the new bits.

However, Google/Street View isn't an allowed source due to copyright so I wouldn't use it while mapping.
Supt_of_Printing (2024-10-18 06:43:17+00:00): I wasn't using Google/Street view to do the mapping, just to cross-check.
fortera_au (2024-10-18 06:48:10+00:00): Generally best to avoid using it at all, just to be safe.
ne17sg (2024-10-20 20:16:26+00:00): The changes to Port Dock line at the station do not agree with the photographs I took there about 2 weeks ago - and editted as best I could to reflect the new station layout and the changes to National Railway museum layout.  If possible you should visit there rather than use out of date sat images
CloCkWeRX (2025-06-15 06:36:36+00:00): This needs reverting, 155687361 is more correct from repeated local survey
CloCkWeRX (2025-06-15 06:55:18+00:00): Ugh, this is a total mess to revert.

- The rail is absolutely incorrect
- The cycleways are incorrect
- This broke multiple relations for key cycleways
ne17sg (2025-06-15 08:09:33+00:00): Thanks the tracks look closer to my visit from last year, but the Port Dock platform is longer and much more to the south east.  
Shame there aren't any sat images from the last year!  
See my note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4461097
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:21:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:21:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601