piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2025-08-17 12:25:45+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
You identified and mapped most buildings,
However, do not cluster buildings. 
Each building need to be mapped as an individual building. I adjusted them. You did not square the rectangular buildings with the Q key while still selected.
I invalidate this task.

Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2025-08-17 12:30:25+00:00): sorry, validated after solving issues.
Best regards
__yoshita__ (2025-08-17 13:26:30+00:00): Thanks for the review—understood: separate building outlines and Q to square rectangles. I’ll re-check and apply this next time. Best regards.
Carto'Cité (2026-01-05 13:17:01+00:00): Hello.
You connected the way https://www.osm.org/way/298806028 (Proménade Gisèle Halimi) to 
https://www.osm.org/way/1209665066, which is located underground at level -1. This lets routing engines jump from the Promenade to the railway platform underneath.
Don't worry I am fixing this.
Cheers,
Antoine from Carto'Cité on behalf of SNCF #Transilien
VLD298 (2026-01-05 15:35:23+00:00): Hi Antoine, 
Thanks for catching this and letting me know. 
Happy mapping!
Lauren
German C (2025-12-03 21:25:49+00:00): Hola Lolj, ¿por que eliminaste los edificios que se habían creado en el año 2020 y los bosques? https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=170362524 (lo rojo fue lo que eliminaste)
German C (2025-12-03 21:21:41+00:00): Hola Lolj, ¿por que eliminaste el parque ecológico del barrio parnaso? https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=170362812 ese parque si existe https://www.facebook.com/42gradosfreestyle/videos/como-llegar-al-parque-ecol%C3%B3gico-del-barrio-parnaso-lugar-donde-se-realizar%C3%A1-la-f/360756365251668/
Scout Jens (2025-08-15 22:46:48+00:00): löschen ist nicht so gut, besser den lifecycle-präfix verwenden, z.B. razed:
JanB27 (2025-08-16 21:07:31+00:00): Ja macht Sinn, hab ich verpeilt
Black_Diamond (2025-08-15 07:23:24+00:00): Thanks for fixing the access permissions.
user_5359 (2025-08-15 14:49:13+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/179199721 (there are other objects too). What is the mean of the tag AISWEB = https://aisweb.decea.mil.br/?i=aerodromos&codigo=SD12 ?
FernandoBoatto (2025-08-15 18:40:06+00:00): Hello! Here in Brazil, AISWEB is an Oficial Information Website about all the airports in Brazil.
user_5359 (2025-08-15 19:11:21+00:00): Thanks for the explanation: wouldn't the key source:url (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source) be better suited to a better assignment?
FernandoBoatto (2025-08-15 21:42:15+00:00): Yeah! I'm gonna update from AISWEB to SOURCE. Thanks!!
NorthCrab_upload (2025-08-12 22:43:08+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/877970859

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Barroszt (2025-08-12 23:14:01+00:00): naprawione
Sylv1_Durif (2025-08-12 23:47:45+00:00): Hey,

I reverted your changes in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170364707 because the way #201041274 is clearly incorrect.

Have a nice day !
CAM-Gerlach (2025-08-13 07:03:32+00:00): Hi TheKegzster—welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thanks for contributing! Your other two changesets appeared fine, but just wanted to let you know that I noticed this one had accidentally deleted the portions of Edge Way in both directions connecting it to Toms Creek Road, meaning that car and bike routing into and out of The Edge apartment complex will be broken—surely not what you intended here, and will presumably cause bigger problems for the cycle mapp application you're trying to use then you were trying to fix :)

Given the critical nature of the change, I immediately pushed a new changeset, #170372077 , fixing the problem. I also split Edge Way between the crossing and Tom's Creek into separate ways, in case that was what you intended to do instead. So its all fixed now, not to worry, and I'm sure you'll be more careful in the future ;)
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170363846
CAM-Gerlach (2025-08-13 07:03:38+00:00): On another note, I see you and several other recently active mappers in the Blacksburg area appear to be affiliated with BikeStreets.com, and have rather particular patterns of mapping viz splitting ways, I assume for routing purposes—could you help me understand a little more about that? Thanks, and happy mapping!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170363846
CAM-Gerlach (2025-08-13 07:13:25+00:00): By the way, that's a really cute kitty cat in your profile photo! >^..^< Also, just a tip—its a great idea to write a detailed changeset comment explaining what you did and why you did it, so that other mappers can understand your intent :)
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170363846
TheKegzster (2025-08-15 13:42:21+00:00): Sorry I missed these messages. That’s my bad on deleting those parts of edge way, it was my first day using OSM and it seemed broken and I was trying to help but probably shouldn’t have touched that it was not necessary. 

I go to school at Virginia Tech and have been trying to help my dad create a network in blacksburg with his team bikestreets. They have a low stress bike map in denver right now and are trying to expand in other places and I thought I could help with blacksburg. The splits are if I want the low stress map to go a certain direction that the current length of the segment doesn’t allow for. The purpose is to make a safe bike map for blacksburg so it’s coming from a good place but I apologize for my inexperience and mistakes with OSM.
CAM-Gerlach (2025-08-16 04:27:05+00:00): No worries, it was a straightforward fix and thanks for the detailed and understanding reply! And its great that you are helping map! I'm a VT alum myself (BA Geography, BS Meteorology '17) exclusively biking everywhere when I was there. Lately I've been mapping bicycle and pedestrian infra around Blacksburg, including a lot of what you and the other BikeStreets.com mapper (your dad?) were working on (including the ways in this changeset), and while I don't always split at every node, it is helpful to split at least by block as well as longer ways at logical breaks.

I really appreciate the additional context; that's really helpful in understanding the situation better. I also talked with the user atticquilt (maybe your dad?) on their changset #170357437 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170357437 who was also mapping for BikeStreets.com but that gives me some additional context to that discussion. 

> The splits are if I want the low stress map to go a certain direction that the current length of the segment doesn’t allow for.

Right, I figured this was because your renderer/router didn't properly support automatically splitting ways at intersections. NB, I discuss this in more detail on the changeset linked above, but in general there is no expectation that OSM ways are split at every intersection unless there is a reason for them to be (e.g. tags, length, relation membership, etc) and the the great majority of them aren't; other data consumers that need it handle this sort of mechanical pre-processing themselves.

Personally, I'm a lot more intentional than most when it comes to splitting ways, doing so at significant intersections and logical points and re-grouping ways consistently, so I find a lot of your changes generally helpful. On the other hand, splitting ways too finely at every single small intersection (especially on things like crossings) can make them more tedious to edit and easier to make mistakes, as well as making the history harder to navigate, without a direct benefit to OSM (since data consumers that need it already handle this properly). For this reason, I've suggested he post on the OSM community forum explaining what you all are doing and why to gather feedback and either get community buy-in for splitting on every single intersection, or collaborate on potential alternatives.

FYI, you and your dad are welcome to join the OSM-US Slack https://openstreetmap.us/get-involved/slack/ if you haven't already, the main hub for the US mapping community—great for asking questions and soliciting community feedback. We recently created a #local-nrv channel for discussion of mapping in the local area. Anyway, happy mapping, good luck with your studies and GO HOKIES!
felipeeugenio (2025-08-13 00:19:38+00:00): Hola. Estamos al tanto de este cambio, pero es ya oficial?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170363848
Cross85 (2025-08-13 01:57:43+00:00): Hola. Si, ya es oficial, pero no se cuánto se demorarán en cambiar la señaletica, quizás habría que esperar eso.
felipeeugenio (2025-08-13 02:28:18+00:00): Si. A eso me refería. Tenemos que reflejar la realidad en terreno. 
Mañana lo veo. 
Saludos y gracias
FroschForscher (2025-08-13 09:39:16+00:00): Hello katosams,

you said you removed a duplicated entry for "+24 Hamma". However there was no duplicated entry. One was a bakery and one was a cafe.

FroschForscher
katosams (2025-08-13 10:27:11+00:00): Hi FroschForscher,
agreed. I wasn‘t reading the wiki carefully enough. I was stuck with „One feature, one OSM element“ and considered the cafe-like interior of the bakery as part of the bakery.
Reading tag:shop=bakery again, I just saw the phrase „If a café is in the same building, add another point to the corresponding properties.“.

So if you agree, I‘ll revert this delete.

In any case, I will start to check the „Ask for review“ before submitting a delete. I‘m super new to the community and maybe was a bit too eager to contribute… :) Sorry for that!

Thank you for the review!

Katosams
FroschForscher (2025-08-15 13:30:56+00:00): Don't worry, everyone must learn. And the OSM tagging scheme is not consistent and logical.

> So if you agree, I‘ll revert this delete.

Sound good. Note that correctly reverting (recreating the same node to keep it's history) is even harder than correctly adding new data. For simple cases like this where you want to revert the entire changeset without risk of conflicts, you can just drop the changeset id into https://revert.osmz.ru/ .
Gregory Peony (2025-08-13 00:24:55+00:00): Hi, please make your changesets informative for other users. If you are doing lots of similar edits then write a few good changeset comments and simply select them from the drop down menu where you write comments after clicking save. Adding features in this case is inaccurate and very non-descript.--- I flagged some highway railway crossings I think you resolved incorrectly by tagging parts of the highway as a tunnel when infact the railway crosses the highway via a bridge. It's possible to know this because the of the shadows cast by the bridges and becasue support structures for a bridge under construction are visible just north of the northern tunnel you added. see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bridge --- Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170364429
Frans S (2025-08-18 09:15:07+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please solve the issues shown by the issue triangle before you upload your work. 
3 waterway crossings had to be identified and mapped !
Best regards and keep mapping
Hopla57 (2025-08-13 00:00:53+00:00): Erreur dans le commentaire : c'est principalement des bâtiments que j'ai ajoutés. 😅
Frans S (2025-08-17 09:57:37+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please square each rectangular building with the Q key while it is still selected. 
Best regards and keep mapping
Hopla57 (2025-08-13 00:51:06+00:00): Voir note :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4476568
MRGH (2025-08-13 01:01:35+00:00): دمت گرم
Gregory Peony (2025-08-13 02:04:12+00:00): Thank you for your contribution. You submitted a much better changeset comment here and the scope of your edits is restricted to the mentioned feature. A welcome improvement.---You are generally correctly identifying power towers, but sometimes they could be more accurately positioned.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170365696
Gregory Peony (2025-08-13 02:05:07+00:00): In this changeset some of the power towers are positioned slightly North and West of where they should be. Aim for the centre point between the supports (legs). I know the imagery resolution here is not amazing, but looking at the shadows should help you more acurately position the towers. The shadows are cast NW in this scene and the point your aiming for should be on the same axis (line) as the shadow(s). There are some imagery distortions here, so I recommend using the bottom half of the visible shadow to obtain the axis. Next (if possible) try to identify where the supports meet the ground. You may find that pressing "w" to toggle wireframe mode may help you see the underlying imagery. You can move selected points by pressing "m" to move it with your cursor, or with "shift+arrow key". The ammount of shift depends on your zoom level. try them out and see which you prefer. For a full list of ID editor shortcuts press "?". I hope this helps.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170365696
Gregory Peony (2025-08-13 02:12:27+00:00): You correctly identified and tagged a bridge in the SW of this changeset. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170365762
Gregory Peony (2025-08-13 09:53:13+00:00): Hi, it seems to me that you tend to use very generic and poor changeset comments whenever you map and save changes to multiple features simultaneously i.e. in one changeset. Be deliberate with your uploads/saves. Work on features that have a logical and/or geographic theme between each save: modifying the name of a fast food resturaunt has virtually nothing to do with transportation and power infrastructure. In this case I probably would have mapped this using 4 changesets (each with a good comment) as follows;

1. Change the name of a resturaunt.
2. Add operator wiki data to power station.
3. Map the railways and crossings (like bridges) along them.
4. Map highways and crossings along them.

Doing this will make it easier for others to review your edits, work with them, and provide feedback and comments. 

In case you forget what you worked on, the changes you made will be displayed in the panel that opens on the left hand side, when you save your work.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170366283
Gregory Peony (2025-08-13 09:57:15+00:00): Are you using the drop down menu of past comments, when you're applying comments to your changesets?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170366283
silversurfer83 (2025-09-14 19:31:17+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171933836
silversurfer83 (2025-09-14 19:33:53+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171933921
silversurfer83 (2025-09-14 19:34:59+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171933950
Taya_S (2025-08-17 10:17:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted DWG Ticket#2025081710000139
Addresses have been incorrectly added as name, no sources are cited and were reported as nonsensical, and the user does not communicate. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18623

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170558413
Ethan Colley (2025-08-13 10:24:36+00:00): OpenStreetMap’s core principle is to map what exists. The presence of danger is not, in itself, a reason for omission — if it were, many other natural and man-made hazards (steep cliffs, unstable rock faces, fast-flowing rivers, abandoned mines) would need to be removed as well.

The fact that a location is dangerous does not mean it ceases to exist, nor that it should be hidden. In some cases, removing it may increase risk: people may still encounter the feature in the real world without warning, and the absence of accurate mapping could make emergencies harder to respond to.

Importantly, mapping a location in OSM is not “promoting” it — OSM is a factual geographic database, not a tourism guide. Just as mapping a cliff does not encourage people to jump from it, mapping a cave entrance does not invite inexperienced individuals to enter it.
fortera_au (2025-08-14 01:38:51+00:00): Fully agree with what you've said, and if there's concerns about how dangerous something is, there's likely a way to tag it as such. Similar to how we tag private trails and roads as such instead of removing them.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170366795
頂級社畜 (2025-08-13 02:36:23+00:00): sorry, I formerly use Google maps for sources. I replace it by using another edit to cover
Fizzie-DWG (2025-08-13 05:41:02+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18574
Fizzie-DWG (2025-08-17 06:25:55+00:00): DWG revert - deletion of apparent existing features

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170550014
user_5359 (2025-08-14 16:55:55+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1421942039, https://www.osm.org/edit?way=1421942034. What is the mean of the tags
NA_KAWASAN = TMN PETALING
NO_POSKOD = 52100.0
ika-chan! (2025-08-13 05:24:38+00:00): BTW, the size of the bounding box is because a sockpuppet of Delta Evas ALL added ways directly to the main E55 relation (according to https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/21572/history/1599), instead of one of the country. Combined with fake junction layouts and other bad mapping, it is clear that the Delta Evas ALL intends to cause disruption to the project, mixing them with legitimate edits to confuse others.
felipeeugenio (2025-08-13 11:52:00+00:00): Hola. No usamos contracciones. Dejar las palabras escritas completas. Gracias
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170368252
naiqi (2025-08-13 19:39:03+00:00): Hola. Me llamaba la atención de que agregar ese segundo apellido pudiese constituir un nombre largo para una calle corta de sólo una cuadra como aquella, sólo eso. Gracias por esta aclaración.
felipeeugenio (2025-08-13 20:01:22+00:00): Gracias a ti por responder. Por favor mirar los comentarios que varios maperos le han hecho a sus ediciones a lo largo del tiempo. (https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=6160757).

Estamos para ayudar, pero por favor empezar a tomar nota de las tècnicas de mapeo. Básicamente cada edición suya hace que otros tengan que arreglar algo.


gracias
qugeb (2026-01-30 10:41:32+00:00): Hallo,

warum ist denn hier 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1421949002#map=19/48.402451/12.958660&layers=N
eine Lücke?
Dort schreibt ein anonymer Einsender, dass der Weg inzwischen durchgängig ist. Könntest du dich als "local" der Sache annehmen?
Taya_S (2026-01-29 08:53:06+00:00): Reverted unexplained boundary edit

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177836902
SomeoneElse (2026-05-10 12:44:35+00:00): Why did you delete https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15969963/history and re-add https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1421957046#map=19/19.433810/-99.127993 here?  What was wrong with the previous one?
bagis (2025-08-13 05:42:45+00:00): Correct changeset comment should be "Add restarant and some buildings" from survey.
andygol (2025-08-13 10:07:10+00:00): Зверніть увагу на https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:Назви#Повторення_назв_в_ключі_з_кодом_мови
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170370696
Кріц (2025-08-13 10:35:00+00:00): Добре, прийму до уваги
Filip009 (2025-08-16 09:37:44+00:00): Mne toto píše ako objekt "rekreačný areál" nie "ihrisko".
MilMapper (2025-08-16 11:25:55+00:00): Ta vyznacena area:  je tam teraz vybudovane oploteny priestor s mini brankami , a moznostou hrat bedminton a pod. Inak cely priestor okolo chaty bude rekreacny priestor (asi v buducnosti tam budu predavat obcerstvenie). Inak teraz spristupnili vonkasi areal verejnosti. Je tam naucny chodnik, ihrisko-oploteny prietsor, miesto na opekanie, miesto na sedenie, jazierko, velke "clovece nezlob sa"...
Filip009 (2025-08-16 11:56:53+00:00): Potom odporúčam tagovanie leisure=pitch a sport=multi. Aby z toho bolo multifunkčné ihrisko.
MilMapper (2025-08-16 12:12:46+00:00): Doplnene. (Mozte overit?)
Filip009 (2025-08-16 12:31:23+00:00): Toto https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse=recreation%20ground by som z tej plochy úplne odstránil a keď má celý ten areál názov, tak by som cca odhadol, že odkiaľ pokiaľ sa nachádza a na to by som pridal ten tag aj s názvom daného strediska a kontaktnými informáciami, pokiaľ sa dajú dohľadať.
Filip009 (2025-08-16 09:16:30+00:00): Zdravím, o aký náučný chodník sa jedná? Je značený? Alebo sa jedná len o náučné tabule?
MilMapper (2025-08-16 11:20:44+00:00): Na sukromnom pozemku urobili naucne tabule-zastavenia (nazvali to naucny chodnik) pristupne verejnosti. Tema:ochrana prirody, fauna, flora, kamene....
Filip009 (2025-08-16 11:55:49+00:00): Okej, tak, keď je to verejnosti prístupné, tak by som tam pridal jednotlivé tabule. Náučný chodník sa vytvára pri vybraní danej cesty sa v ľavej časti nachádza sekcia relácie, tam je potrebné pre náučný chodník vytvoriť novú reláciu. Relácia funguje tak, že by mala zlučovať všetky cesty, po ktorých trasa vedie. V tomto prípade len tú jednu novú :)
MilMapper (2025-08-16 12:08:40+00:00): Nemam nafotene tie tabule a neviem presne rozlozenie. A ako oznacit jednotlive stanoviska?
Filip009 (2025-08-16 12:28:39+00:00): Záleží od toho, čo sa tam nachádza. Pokiaľ sú tam len tabule, tak tourism=information, information=board. Pokiaľ aj nejaké iné atrakcie, tak záleží od toho, aké tam sú atrakcie.
CAM-Gerlach (2026-05-26 19:39:02+00:00): Removed SEO spam tags and fixed tagging errors for Chefline POI in changeset 183226291

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183226291
user_21736114 (2025-08-13 11:42:31+00:00): Окрім виправлень помилок у різних об'єктах , зробив реверт правки / у ній безпідставно змінювався статус доріг на living_street /
eggie (2025-08-13 07:15:25+00:00): Dag Eric..

Op een paaltje hoort geen motor_vehicle=no  Dat geeft weer andere problemen. Bv met moped en mofa.
Zulke accesstags zijn default. .. net als foot=yes en bicycle =yes

Ik het de accesstags weer verwijderd. 
Wel is belangrijk dat je aangeeft of het paaltje flexible, foldable, fixed enz is.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-08-13 07:15:53+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_car&route=52.739211%2C5.183342%3B52.73898%2C5.184238#map=18/52.738372/5.183036&layers=N
Allison P (2025-08-13 16:03:18+00:00): This is SEO spam. The address is a single-family home with no signage, clearly not open to the public.
user_5359 (2025-08-14 15:59:41+00:00): Hello Allison P.! The original entry was made at https://www.osm.org/node/13068004194. I have already deleted the SEO description, but this address is listed on the website. Your suggestion to delete it because of an incorrect address type therefore does not seem valid to me. 

However, you are free to proceed with the deletion.
Allison P (2025-08-14 16:05:20+00:00): I have seen the house in person. I understand that the business is registered here and the address is on the website, but there is no office open to the public. It is not a kind of listing suited to OSM. I get it if you don't want to touch this issue since it can be tricky to figure out sometimes. I will delete it at some point.