piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
b-holdet (2023-09-21 18:20:06+00:00): Jamen, er det så ikke bare at det indberettet til https://sdfi.dk/vores-opgaver/dataindsamling/indberetning
MicDK (2023-09-21 18:34:02+00:00): En lille ting mere. 

Blandt rettelserne er det egentlig kun "Kogtved", som lever op til at være en "suburb" = en forstadsbebyggelse over et større område" 

Med undtagelse af Hallindskov Huse, som må defineres som en "hamlet", så er der i de andre tilfælde tale om "neighbourhoods" = dele af Svendborg by eller dets forstæder.

Bemærk navnet på vejen "Hallindskovvej". Det er den korrekte lokal stavemåde. 

Skrevet i al venlighed :-)


https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dsuburb
b-holdet (2023-09-22 16:48:14+00:00): Hej MicDK. Data er fundet udfra SDFI's datagrundlag og der skelner man kun mellem "byer" og "bebyggelser", hvor "bydel" er en underdel af "byer".
"bebyggelser" dækker over "hamlet" og mindre bebyggelser. "byer" er lidt større.
Jeg kan ikke afgøre, om SDFI har navngivet en bydel, nabolag, eller kvarter, men jeg kan som udgangspunkt sætte et punkt ind med navnet.
Herefter kan en lokal mapper (eks. MicDK) tilføje punktet med mere vide, såsom om stedet er andet end "bydel".
Jeg håber at du har samme opfattelse af de dele, som du selv mapper, altså at andre kan tilføre viden og evt. gøre data mere brugbare. Selv ændrer jeg gerne kortet udfra de fakta, som jeg støder på, evt. fra medier eller selve lokationen.

Også skrevet i al venliged.
VMPanes (2023-09-11 18:47:10+00:00): *Correction: [Pozorrubio, Pangasinan]
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:10:12+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365086
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:10:05+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365082
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:09:58+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365081
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:09:53+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365078
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:09:47+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365076
HellMap (2023-09-11 18:47:17+00:00): https://saulkrasti.lv/jaunumi/pasvaldiba-un-sabiedriba/leona-paegles-ielu-pardeves-par-varavas-ielu/
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:09:41+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365075
aseidel (2023-09-12 14:59:47+00:00): Lieber ma-rt-in,
ich bin gerade über diese Änderungen gestolpert. Darf ich fragen, warum Du diese Kreisstraße als hw=unclassified taggst? Nach meinem Verständnis müsste es wegen der Verkehrsbedeutung als Kreisstraße (sogar mit begleitendem Radweg) hw=tertiary sein/bleiben (siehe auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway=tertiary?uselang=de), zumal die K21 in Vögelsen bereits als tertiary verläuft und dann in Mechtersen in ihrer Funktion als Kreisstraße endet. Vielleicht sehe ich hier aber auch was falsch - ich würde daher gern verstehen, warum Du hw=unclassified hier als richtig ansiehst.
Freue mich auf eine Antwort!
Herzliche Grüße
Antje Seidel
#lgmaps
ma-rt-in (2023-09-12 17:11:25+00:00): Hallo Antje,

ich sehe hier keine Verkehrsbedeutung, die ein hw=tertiary darlegt.
Das der Fuß-/Radweg abgesetzt ist, mag nett sein, steiget aber nicht die Verkehrsbeutung der Straße.

vg
aseidel (2023-09-13 08:26:56+00:00): Lieber ma-rt-in,
danke Dir für die schnelle Rückmeldung. Mein Hauptargument für hw=tertiary wäre die Tatsache, dass die Straße als Kreisstraße *gewidmet* ist. Ich lese das Wiki so, dass Kreisstraßen üblicherweise als hw=tertiary getaggt werden ("Kreisstraße, ehemalige Bundes- oder Landesstraße oder sehr gut ausgebaute Gemeindeverbindungsstraße, die im Regelfall mindestens vier Meter breit ist und manchmal mit, manchmal ohne Mittellinie ausgestattet ist. Sie verbindet kleinere Orte und dient dem innerregionalen Verkehr." https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway=tertiary?uselang=de; vgl. auch noch hier: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Attribuierung_von_Stra%C3%9Fen_in_Deutschland#Kreisstra%C3%9Fen; demnach können sie bei höherer Bedeutung sogar als hw=secondary getaggt werden, was hier natürlich nicht passt). Aus meiner Sicht entspricht die K21 vollständig der Definition im Wiki. Da ich mich aber mit dem hw-Tagging bisher nicht im Detail befasst habe, lerne ich gerne dazu! Gibt es noch andere Anhaltspunkte, an denen man die Verkehrsbedeutung festmachen könnte, wenn Widmung, ortsverbindende Funktion und Ausbauzustand (Breite, separate Radinfrastruktur usw.) nicht ausreichen? Habe mir eine overpass-Abfrage dazu angesehen (http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1AlU), aber auch hier sehe ich Kreisstraßen nur in absoluten Ausnahmefällen als hw=unclassified.
Danke für den Austausch dazu.
Herzliche Grüße
Antje Seidel
#lgmaps
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:09:35+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365072
gscholz (2023-09-14 06:51:59+00:00): Hi Delgado11,
this changeset has created errors regarding self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-50.79314&lat=2.08345&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
4004 (2023-09-17 22:52:38+00:00): Добрый день, спасибо за правку.
то, что дом жилой, указывается тегом building=residential/house/detached. в нейм пишется имя собственное
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:09:28+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365069
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:08:35+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365055
Bienson (2023-09-12 00:34:59+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/53039656

Das kann nicht sein, die Schienen sind nicht elektrifiziert.
gallseife (2023-09-12 07:43:12+00:00): Natürlich nicht, ich habe meinen Blödsinn wieder entfernt.
Human1each (2023-09-13 00:58:37+00:00): Correction: Source used was Esri World Imagery
user_18267930 (2023-09-12 18:02:06+00:00): Have you seen 1206981468 on the ground? Or why is there no fixme=resurvey? Merci pour tes précisions.
paulbrunner (2023-09-11 19:14:51+00:00): Hi rodri776, thanks for your contribution and welcome to OpenStreetMap! I see you requested a review for the changes you made, so I had a look.

There's a long street that you (maybe unintentionally) changed from a "unclassified road" to a "path": https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/106766606/history

I've changed it back to "unclassified" because there's an important distinction: paths are not meant to be used by cars. This street does connect several villages though and cars should be able to use it. You can find more info on how to map different types of streets in the project description of the HOT task (https://tasks.hotosm.org/projects/15468/tasks)
or in much more detail on the Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway).

Thanks again for joining OpenStreetMap and happy mapping!

All the best,
Paul
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141128957
Awoobis (2023-09-11 19:23:15+00:00): Czyżby kontener PCK?
lukabułka (2023-09-16 09:34:33+00:00): Tak a co?
Awoobis (2023-09-16 12:49:44+00:00): Dodałem tagi pck https://www.osm.org/changeset/141341105
AntMadeira (2024-12-25 04:19:17+00:00): Olá, João.
Espero encontrar-te bem.

Cruzei-me por acaso com esta teu conjunto de alterações e gostava de saber qual foi o teu raciocínio para teres eliminado o ponto de localidade de Oliveira do Conde.
Com esta tua alteração, Oliveira de Conde desapareceu do mapa e a área de freguesia ficou sem capital administrativa...

Cumprimentos,
António Madeira.
João Pedro Tavares (2024-12-25 10:14:28+00:00): Bom dia António Madeira, está tudo bem. Já não recordo como fiz essa proeza de eliminar o ponto da capital administrativa da freguesia de Oliveira do Conde. Possivelmente, esse ponto estaria colocado dentro da anterior área da sede da Junta de Freguesia de Oliveira de Conde e após de ter corrigido a marcação do edifício, não lembrei de colocar novamente. Deve ter sido isso. Boas festas e feliz ano de 2025.
AntMadeira (2024-12-25 16:19:20+00:00): Acontece aos melhores. ;)
Vou então reverter. Depois é veres se queres voltar a ajustar o polígono da junta de freguesia.

Boas festas também para ti!
Awoobis (2023-09-11 19:08:44+00:00): Oraz: tagowania 2 bankomatów, rampa dla niepełnosprawnych przy wejściu, poprawienie tagowania dla niepełnosprawnych. Rozdzielenie łazienki
vtq3ep (2023-09-12 23:56:06+00:00): Please stop editing this.  Latest satellite photo doesn't reflect recent construction.
pantufla (2023-10-10 08:43:47+00:00): Qué tipo de compañía es proveedor de transporte?
stillhart (2023-09-24 19:32:16+00:00): ❤
Dimitar155 (2023-09-11 19:57:13+00:00): Всичко изглежда наред. Само за https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/167324252 не ясно дали е една сграда, тъй като североизточната секция има различен покрив, малко по-ниска е и изглежда сякаш има собствен вход.
Fraxi (2023-09-11 20:56:33+00:00): Има собствен вход и той е малко по-навътре. Аз затова начертах пътечката.
Fraxi (2023-09-11 21:14:13+00:00): По-късно разбрах какво имаш предвид, но не мога да си изтрия коментара :D
Dimitar155 (2023-09-12 05:27:02+00:00): Нищо, случва се :).
aceman444 (2024-11-10 23:24:11+00:00): Dakujem za otvorenie ciest.
Ale preco je len kratky usek https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/963239191 jednosmerny?
emersonveenstra (2023-09-11 20:31:50+00:00): Hi,

Please only make one way for each fairway unless they are physically separated. Could you please fix this?
DanteD2323 (2023-09-13 02:10:19+00:00): My hand gets sore from all the clicking and I "take a break" by doing the fairway in sections. 

Does it really hurt anything by me doing this?
emersonveenstra (2023-09-13 11:31:05+00:00): It's really less about it hurting you and more about being considerate of the other mappers who will modify it after you. Also you can take a break and leave the editor tab open, and then come back to it once you're ready to start again
emersonveenstra (2023-09-11 20:33:08+00:00): Hi,

Please use the ref value as it was intended, by only putting the number of the hole, not the name. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:golf=hole?uselang=en
DanteD2323 (2023-09-13 02:08:57+00:00): In all honesty, does this hurt anything?
emersonveenstra (2023-09-13 11:34:23+00:00): You seem to have a very selfish view of OSM. It doesn't exist for your golf game, it's a worldwide mapping database, and there are agreed upon rules to follow, one of which is that the ref tag is numbers only on a golf hole
DanteD2323 (2023-09-14 15:54:40+00:00): Easy … there are much bigger things to get upset about. If it really means that much to you I can change it.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:07:53+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365047
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:07:49+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365046
Rockedf (2023-09-11 20:20:06+00:00): Hi, why did you remove the bitcoin tags from the site? I added them 2 months ago because I checked with a bitcoiner who visited them and confirmed that they accepted bitcoin as a payment method. How did you verify that they stopped accepting bitcoin?
Liongrass (2023-09-11 20:24:12+00:00): Hi! I went to the place myself and talked to somebody who worked there for 35 years, I even asked her to check with the manager. They said they never accepted Bitcoin and won't do so. In addition I spoke to a Bitcoiner who goes there at least once per week and he said they had never accepted Bitcoin and he never heard of anyone spending Bitcoin there.
Rockedf (2023-09-11 20:32:17+00:00): Thank you for your response. If you already verified in person or with another Bitcoiner then the information is correct. Best regards.
Liongrass (2023-09-11 21:18:38+00:00): I hope that not too soon in the future we can change this back!
Liongrass (2023-09-11 21:18:53+00:00): not too *far
Rockedf (2023-09-11 21:21:06+00:00): Absolutely!
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:07:43+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365041
emersonveenstra (2023-09-11 20:37:23+00:00): Hi,

Please stop deleting other people's work if you're just going to redraw it. Modify the existing green, so that the previous person's work isn't lost.
DanteD2323 (2023-09-13 02:08:13+00:00): I started to modify the existing green but it was taking a really long time to move each point. It was much quicker to delete it and re-draw it. 

Question. I am new to OpenStreetMap, I only do this to import the layout into a PC golf game. Only the greens were outlined, what does outlining just the greens do?
emersonveenstra (2023-09-13 11:32:56+00:00): Again, it's more about being considerate of others, it's not a race to map as fast as possible.

The previous mapper probably just only had time to do the greens, there's no rule that you have to finish a golf course once you start, any little bit helps
DanteD2323 (2023-09-14 15:52:24+00:00): Question … like I said, I’m new to this website. What is all this mapping actually used for?
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:07:35+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365037
eggie (2023-09-12 05:06:46+00:00): Mikjew   En hier zijn alle relaties van het OV nu stuk.. Je hebt geen rekening gehouden met de routerelaties.

Een langsliggendtrottoir wordt gebuilelijk opgenomen in het fietspad met sidewalk=right.
Verfstrepen zijn geen middenberm, maar kun  je gewoon overschrijden.
Wanneer je de echt gescheiden stukken wilt aanpakken als aparte rijstroken zul je dit met editor JOSM moeten doen om de routerelaties weer goed te krijgen. De volgorde van de routedelen gaat anders verloren. Hier gaan de helft van de busroutes tegen de oneway in. Ik kan dit beter terugdraaien.
gr eggie
eggie (2023-09-12 05:09:18+00:00): reverted by changeset #141142884

Kijk eens hier ... 
 
editor josm stap voor stap 

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/editor-josm-stap-voor-stap/75047
eggie (2023-09-12 05:12:22+00:00): Er lopen hier acht OV routerelatries...  

Dat is dus meer werk dan alleen de weg verdubbelen waar een middenberm is. Dat wordt uitzoeken welke richting welke route loopt.
... en met josm uiteraard. 
Mapse
eggie
gscscnd (2023-09-12 06:47:32+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/255481315
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/598396516
opening_date do usunięcia.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/255481317
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/598396517
construction do poprawienia.
mtmail (2023-10-28 18:21:24+00:00): As a fellow mapper I would appreciate if the changeset comments were more than the word "updates" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments#Examples
Đuro Jiří (2023-09-14 09:03:22+00:00): Trunk è una strada sulla quale, tra l'altro, è vietato il transito alle biciclette e ai pedoni.  Cosa non vale per questa strada.Per questo motivo ho ripristinato l'ultima modifica.
CurlingMan13 (2023-11-21 03:26:16+00:00): Do not overlap areas.  Please read up here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#:~:text=the%20building%20itself.-,Common%20mapping%20pitfalls,-Adding%20name%3D*
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141132015
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:07:28+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365036
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:06:56+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141365028
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:04:06+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141364989
eggie (2023-09-12 05:25:28+00:00): 	Hoi,
1970;1999;2016

is niet eenduidig.. Het Kadaster is het waarschijnlijk anders.
Zou in dat geval de laatste verbouwing nemen. 

Gr eggie
eggie (2023-09-12 05:27:40+00:00): Kadaster gaat uit van Oorspronkelijk bouwjaar

    1970 

https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/?searchQuery=Wethouder+Sangersstraat+172&objectId=0888100000012634&theme=BRT+Achtergrond&geometry.x=183669.00699999998&geometry.y=328965.539&zoomlevel=12.847268769528775&bijbehorendeAdressen=Pand
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:04:03+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141364988
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-03 16:13:29+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11184333892/history has aerial=yes that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
what this tag means? Is it maybe taggable with man_made=survey_point as https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:aerial claims? Or is maybe some other intended meaning?
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-03 16:15:12+00:00): Is man_made=survey_point with aerial=yes having any different meaning than man_made=survey_point without aerial=yes?
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:03:55+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141364987
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:03:48+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141364984
Strubbl (2023-09-11 20:25:43+00:00): siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3882638
gscholz (2023-09-14 07:00:19+00:00): Hi Equipe_OBRAC_DiêgoRodrigues,
this changeset has created errors regarding self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-64.30952&lat=-8.85264&zoom=8&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
george1201 (2023-09-11 20:29:58+00:00): Der Kommentar zum CS ist falsch!
Sollte heißen:
Aufgrund von Hinweis https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3802827 eine Vorort-Prüfung vorgenommen. Wohnhaus ist im Bau und sollte bald fertig werden. Die genaue Geometrie des Gebäude muss noch geprüft werden.
emersonveenstra (2023-09-11 20:36:22+00:00): Hi,

For the cartpaths, why are you using golf=path instead of the more standard golf=cartpath?
DanteD2323 (2023-09-13 02:01:33+00:00): I import this into PGA 2K21 and the golf paths look *way* more realistic when golf=path.
Famlam (2023-09-28 19:07:12+00:00): Hallo Jasper, er staan nu in Nijmegen 214 maal 0800 telefoonnummers met +31. Voor zover ik weet zijn dat nationale nummers, dus niet met +31 te bellen. (En zo wel, klinkt +310800 raar, want meestal moet je de voorloopnul verwijderen als je +31 toevoegd). Ik ben echter geen expert op dit gebied.

Weet je zeker dat dit klopt?
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1B9H
jxpsert (2023-09-28 19:11:14+00:00): Nope, dat weet ik niet zeker. Ik ben niet bekend met het bestaan van nationale nummers. Als jij weet dat dat zonder +31 moet, mag je die van mij verwijderen :)
Famlam (2023-09-28 19:59:58+00:00): Ik gooi het wel even op het forum. (P.s. het idee is natuurlijk dat je alleen dingen toevoegt waarvan je weet dat 't klopt 😉)

Mocht het fout zijn, zou ik waarderen als je het zelf herstelt :). Ze zijn in grote getalen toegevoegd.
jxpsert (2023-09-28 20:03:27+00:00): Ik dacht dat +31 gewoon een algemeen iets was. Als je geen benul hebt dat iets fout kan zijn, ga je het ook niet opzoeken.

Ik ga binnenkort de 31’s weghalen.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:03:42+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141364980
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:03:35+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141364978
eggie (2023-09-12 04:53:37+00:00): Dag Mikjew   Let op dat je geen wegen vastmaakt aan de landuse.
Ook geen vlakken landuse vastmaken aan de landuse=residential.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=141132998

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-09-12 04:58:47+00:00): Welkoop verplaatst naar adresnode
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:03:29+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141364975
Fizzie-DWG (2024-01-08 03:58:47+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146013690
george1201 (2023-11-16 07:21:53+00:00): Hallo Rainero,
du hast im Knoten 7091877932 "shop=supermarket" eingetragen. Konntest du sehen, dass die Spielothek nicht mehr da ist? In diesem Fall sollte man auch das Tag leisure=adult_gaming_centre entfernen. Im Moment ist es etwas widersprüchlich. Oder ist es gar ein Supermarkt, in dem auch Automatenspiele aufgebaut sind? :-)
Rainero (2023-11-16 19:51:18+00:00): Hallo george1201,

das Attribut habe ich wohl übersehen. Hab's korrigiert. Danke für den Hinweis!

Viele Grüße,
Rainer
Fizzie-DWG (2024-01-08 03:57:04+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146013657
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-09-12 16:19:51+00:00): Hi, good edit.
One thing that can be improved is that default name value should be in a local language and it's the English one which should be added separately
falconmaster (2023-09-12 19:29:50+00:00): Thank you for the guidance! I have tweaked the labels in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141178577
Frans S (2023-09-24 14:12:37+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
A: Inaccurate mapped. 
B: Overlapping buildings.
C: Collecting multiple buildings and mapping them as 1 building.
H: A courtyard or a clearing not mapped into a building.
Most buildings need  to be mapped more accurate.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141133259
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:01:05+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141364947
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:00:58+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141364945
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:00:51+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141364944
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 04:00:42+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141364942
Fizzie-DWG (2024-01-08 03:56:59+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146013653
limes11 (2024-01-19 17:04:45+00:00): Hallo, 

kannst du mal auf 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4075897

Nur Umbau/Renovierung oder tatsächlich abgerissen ?

Viele Grüße!
Tatfahren (2024-01-19 17:49:51+00:00): Tatsächlich abgerissen, aber schon im oder vor dem Jahr 2022 (https://www.landesvermessung.sachsen.de/aktualitaet-und-planung-der-turnusbefliegungen-8792.html) .

Das alte Gebäude ist noch in historischen Luftbildern sichtbar, im Saxony latest aerial ist leicht zugewachsener Kies sichtbar.

Da es sich um eine Baulücke handelt, ist die warscheinlichkeit eines Neubaus an gleicher Position natürlich groß gewesen, daher habe ich auch die Adresse stehen gelassen.

Das Haus auf google earth ist deutlich ein Neubau, auch wegen der anderen Gebäudeform.
eggie (2025-10-25 08:02:52+00:00): Dan Andre...   Kijk svp in de wiki hoe de routering is geregeld met use_sidepath.
Ook de richting van het fietspad stond verkeer op de Crullaan.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-10-25 08:05:35+00:00): Wat is cycleway=use_sidepath.. Waar komt die tag vandaan?
Ik heb het aangepast naar bicycle=use_sidepath

en bicycle:backward=use_sidepath op een stukje.
eggie (2025-10-25 08:11:00+00:00): Kijk anders even hier  nog een keer https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bicycle%3Duse_sidepath

Het is al weer een tijd geleden. Wellicht doe je het nu wel goed?

MVG
eggie
Fizzie-DWG (2024-01-08 03:56:54+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146013649
Tjuro (2023-09-20 17:13:43+00:00): Hello BertMule,

Ik zie dat je hier verschillende waterway=ditch hebt opgeknipt en die samen in een multipoligoon hebt gestopt?
Zou je dit mogelijk aan kunnen passen zodat er niet onnodig multipoligoons zijn? En zodat waterway=ditch niet onnodig opgeknipt worden?

Met vriendelijke groet,
Tjuro
Tjuro (2023-09-21 06:20:31+00:00): Hello BertMule,

Ik heb deze fouten voor jou opgelost. Geleve die niet meer in de toekomst te doen. Anders zou ik het moeten reverten en dat is zonde.

Met vriedelijke groet,

Tjuro
Lordmcfuzz (2023-09-11 21:41:03+00:00): Oops forgot to say the source is a combination of local knowledge and Streetview imagery