piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
BrunoTDG0000000 (2024-12-01 00:37:36+00:00): Lo siento, no sabía que estaba prohibido, aclaro que, por lo que sé, son los únicos datos que extraje de GM, lo digo porque añadí el Canal Estero del Molino, pero como mencioné en su momento, para una parte me base en un mapa de los años 50 mientras que la otra tuve que construirla en base a conjeturas y las imágenes de satélite.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-11-30 20:11:56+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6205111401
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/957520742

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/957519264

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
mariotomo (2024-12-02 06:02:23+00:00): he mirado las fotos aéreas mencionadas, y no veo nada en toda la zona. además las casas son mucho más grandes de lo normal para esta zona. por esta razón he revertido la contribución.
aceman444 (2025-07-04 08:04:59+00:00): Hi, why is it not possible to go on the road https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/46039554 ? You added access=no so that absolutely none can drive on that road segment. What is happening on that road? Is it in construction?
martin_schnurer (2025-07-04 08:21:26+00:00): hello, yes, it should be still closed because of the traffic calming because of reconstruction of the bridge crossing "Maly Dunaj". Here is the link https://bratislava.sme.sk/c/23417780/vrakuna-mapa-most-doprava.html
martin_schnurer (2025-07-04 08:23:58+00:00): also here: https://youtu.be/Lwh8HLIkHNs?si=ml0lxrbg_a6PMDgy&t=98
ivanbranco (2026-05-15 10:54:57+00:00): Hi xrt,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12386918988

are you sure this (the one linked and the five around it) six trees are pinus? usually pinus are needleaved trees

thanks and good mapping
Filip009 (2025-07-07 18:38:18+00:00): #mapycom user report #2866071 - "Neaktualny zakaz vjazdu." - viete prosím potvrdiť, alebo vyvrátiť danú hypotézu? Resp. potvrdiť, či je dané miesto stále prejazdné len pre autobusy?
martin_schnurer (2025-07-08 07:42:26+00:00): ked na to pozeram, myslim ze je to zle zaznacene. Malo by to byt tak, ze je to oneway pre auta. Povoleny je iba vjazd smerom od Mostu, ale nie je povoleny od BA.  Zle som pochopil tu infografiku od mestskeho uradu https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=873890304930847&set=pcb.867911718862039
martin_schnurer (2025-07-08 07:44:36+00:00): ale ak mam pravdu povedat, byvam blizko a soferi to nedodrziavaju a nikto to nekontroluje ani, cize asi to aj dam uplne prec
Filip009CZ (2025-07-09 14:31:06+00:00): Potom by tam skorej bolo pridať oneway=yes a oneway:bus=no :)
ntzm (2024-12-01 18:47:16+00:00): Burton Road is not oneway, I have reverted that change.

The bus gate is on this way as `motor_vehicle:backward=private`
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1339060799
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:15:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:20:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:16:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:14:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:15:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:21:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
literan (2024-12-01 10:55:14+00:00): в name капсом не пишем
NorthCrab_upload (2024-11-30 21:40:48+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/978706888

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2024-11-30 21:40:49+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/978706902

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2024-11-30 21:40:47+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/978706882

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eggie (2024-12-01 17:36:12+00:00): Dag Jordi. Ik heb het opnieuw uitgelijnd conform de BAG data.
Het lijkt dan verkeerd, maar ligt precies goed.
Stel je een wolkenkrabber voor en je tekent het dak in op grond van een schuin genomen luchtfoto. Ligt op die plek het gebouw? Dat ligt misschien 100 verderop.
Groet
eggie
iamJordi (2024-12-01 17:58:40+00:00): Ik heb even gekeken wat de ‘BAG’-data inhoudt, en het blijkt dat deze data er inderdaad voor zorgt dat alle adressen en gebouwen goed op de kaart gezet worden. Ik zal wat meer onderzoek doen over dit onderwerp. Het is dus inderdaad zo dat de meeste gebouwen al goed getekend zijn?
eggie (2024-12-01 18:03:18+00:00): Yep  99 %,

Soms wordt er iets verbouwd en dan vraag je opnieuw import aan. 
Soms pads ik het met de hand aan....  mits de BAG actueel is. Loopt de  BAG achter dan kun je een terugmelding doen naar de BAG... Die BAG import overschrijft anders altijd de zaken die je hebt veranderd.
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/?searchQuery=Celsiusweg+8&objectId=0080200000386549&theme=BRT+Achtergrond&geometry.x=180153.075&geometry.y=578813.435&zoomlevel=15
eggie (2024-12-01 18:05:36+00:00): Op de achtergrond van de editor JOSM kan ik de BAG en de BGT (transparant)  zetten op de foto. 
Dus aanrader is... JOSM. 
editor josm stap voor stap
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/editor-josm-stap-voor-stap/75047

BGT implementeren 
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59021
Forumdraadje ..  De beste imagery layers om NL OSM te mappen met JOSM.
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/de-beste-imagery-layers-om-nl-osm-te-mappen-met-josm/85393
hfs (2024-11-30 21:54:22+00:00): Revert meines früheren Changesets https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159789010 von 2018.
joel56dt (2024-12-01 17:27:09+00:00): 👍
I copied the address from the deleted building to the construction area just so we don't lose it.
ngry_pazuzu (2024-12-02 18:10:28+00:00): Good idea. Thanks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:21:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:10:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:13:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:20:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:15:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:12:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:13:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:16:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
Mathias_ADAV (2024-12-10 09:17:43+00:00): Bonjour,
j'ai modifié en cycleway = lane, en effet il y-a des potelets aux niveaux des intersections mais à ma connaissance, la grande partie de la rue est en bandes cyclables dans les deux sens.

Bon mapping!
Mathias
yelisey90 (2024-11-30 23:17:36+00:00): fix boundary geometry

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159790969
Aenet (2024-11-30 23:33:12+00:00): meant to add source=local_knowledge;aerial_imagery here
John Kastner (2024-12-01 00:09:56+00:00): Hi, when you're adding `crossing:signals=no` have you actually surveyed these crossings and confirmed the absence of signals?

I would be very surprised if some of these (e.g., https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/49789172/history/6) are actually uncontrolled crossing. In general, I don't think it's safe to assume that something tagged as `crossing=marked` can be safely "upgraded" to `crossing=uncontrolled` with `crossing:signals` because it's quite likely the original mapper did not intended assert nonexistence of signals when tagging the crossing as marked.
AriannaL (2024-12-01 01:33:33+00:00): Hi there, you're correct. I meant to only upgrade marking=zebra as that is now deprecated, not add uncontrolled tag to crossing.
BCNorwich (2024-12-01 06:49:17+00:00): The original house outlines are reinstated to keep their history, then amended. Please amend/correct existing features, not just delete and redraw.

Regards Bernard.
papaj (2025-01-09 13:50:08+00:00): Are these path's physically seperated from the highway? Usual convention is to use the 'sidewalk' tag on the highway to define location etc of the path. Even if the path is seperated, the path itself typically does not have it's own name so the name tag should be removed.
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2024-12-30 14:14:28+00:00): نرجوا منكم عدم إضافة أماكن عشوائية للخريطة
DUGA (2024-12-03 15:43:04+00:00): This is another reminder before I report you to the DWG, that you should not remove any TIGER without really addressing all concerns, including but not limited to these below:

1. Alignment
2. Name
3. Number
4. Surface

If I spot any further changes you make, that do not fully address the issues, you will be reported because your activities here have created some issues to others that we can no longer track poor map data.
blocal186 (2024-12-03 22:34:30+00:00): I have taken your advice and am seeking more information from the community. 

Feel free to join the discussion https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/what-is-required-to-consider-a-tiger-road-reviewed/122516/
pavvv (2024-12-01 09:21:23+00:00): Proszę zaprzestać tym zmianom. W terenie na tabliczkach widnieją numery 5. Drogę będącą urzędowo wojewódzką oznaczono tagiem highway:category:pl=2.
oba510 (2024-12-01 05:39:24+00:00): Don't you need a permit to use EBMUD trails?
Ruthless78 (2024-12-01 20:42:55+00:00): Yes there is an EBMUD permit to use the trails but it's so loosely enforced that effectively access=yes because anyone from the public who wishes to hike these trails can.  Access=permit suggests that there's a restriction but in this case anyone who wants the permit can get one (there's no waitlist or limit) and nobody is guarding the trailheads to check for permits.  I've hiked every EBMUD trail and have never been asked to show a permit.  And access=permit is not consistently applied to all of the EBMUD trails (some show access=yes).  This creates problems for applications like wandrer.earth that are working with global norms where permit is considered to be restrictive and treated as private so the paths are not visible or considered.
SomeoneElse (2024-12-02 16:54:06+00:00): While https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1334140977/history was pretty obviously an abandoned railway based on the imagery, what would have made most sense here would have been to apply the railway=abandoned (or similar) tag to the extant track here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1334140978 .  Your changeset comment here is factually inaccurate here in that there IS still a trace of it in OSM.  It didn't make sense for the other mapper to duplicate the way in OSM, but to just delete the duplicate without preserving the tags doesn't make sense.
UPegasus (2025-04-28 13:10:09+00:00): Це реально зрізані кути у дороги, чи це просто втрата сигналу GPS?
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-08 04:15:22+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164659495
ElliottPlack (2024-12-09 18:00:07+00:00): Thanks! It looks like https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11460968180 got moved way out of whack in this update. Can you doublecheck?
jhaluska80 (2024-12-09 18:12:11+00:00): I must have dragged it accidentally when trying to navigate the map.  I have moved it back.  Thanks for catching that.
Lumikeiju (2024-12-01 05:19:24+00:00): Changeset comment correction: Horseshoe Lake, not Hatchet Lake
felipeeugenio (2024-12-01 14:21:16+00:00): Hola. Cuál Block es cuál?
Están todos con housename=X y name=Y
felipeeugenio (2024-12-01 14:22:52+00:00): lo arreglé según lo que creo que en verdad es
M E Menk (2024-12-07 10:40:11+00:00): Dra på befaring neste gang, så du ikke tegner inn ting som ikke eksisterer.
syedk (2024-12-03 07:04:34+00:00): Hii ..I have modelled it based on our interanl evidence. Thank you for highlighting and correcting it!!
addyx (2024-12-03 08:36:36+00:00): Thanks syedk! I've corrected it a few times and your team keeps "correcting" it back. I also tried to initiate a dialogue about it but didn't get any reponse.

I know this area well; there is no median here throughout the length of the road.
mariotomo (2024-12-02 05:13:32+00:00): hola. 
porqué borraste este nodo?
no hay un "San Isidro" aquí?
podrías por favor considerar describir los cambios que aportas a la base de datos, para ayudar a los que se dedican a validar las contribuciones. gracias.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
jeslop (2024-12-02 15:28:24+00:00): Hola AdministradorDelMapa, gracias por colaborar con OSM y bienvenido. Es necesario que sigas las directrices marcadas en https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenos_comentarios_en_conjuntos_de_cambios, lo que beneficia a todos los usuarios de la comunidad. Del mismo modo procura mantener el tono de la conversación en los niveles de respeto adecuados a una comunidad como ésta.

Saludos,
Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
data@osmfoundation.org
Franco-PTY (2024-12-02 16:00:14+00:00): Osea que si hay personal activo de dicha organización y dice que hacer y como pero no dan incentivos ni nada para los que estamos interesados en dar actualización fiables y beneficiosas en el mapa. Un tal Mario y ahora tú tienen el mismo sentido de decir y decir, pero no de enseñar e incentivar. (Por personas así este mapa está desactualizado) OJALÁ CAMBIEN LA JUNTA DIRECTIVA DE (OSM) LATAM y CARIBE y coloquen a alguien que impulse de verdad este fabuloso mapa que lamentablemente tiene como staff a personas que... (Prefiero reservar mis comentarios)

Saludos! "Jeslop" 🙃
Franco-PTY (2024-12-02 16:04:12+00:00): es lamentable ver como alguien es editor desde el 2010 y solo tiene 15mil ediciones. (de Staff) no tienes ni las ediciones necesarias para respetarte o darme ejemplo.
Franco-PTY (2024-12-02 16:15:30+00:00): Estimado equipo de OpenStreetMap,

Me dirijo a ustedes para expresar mi profunda decepción con respecto a uno de los miembros del staff de editores, "Jeslop". Considero que el staff debería desempeñar un papel activo en la motivación y el incentivo de la comunidad, sin embargo, en mi experiencia, esto no ha sido el caso.

Estoy particularmente preocupado por la eficiencia y el compromiso de "Jeslop". A pesar de estar en el staff, su contribución en términos de ediciones es considerablemente baja, con solo 15,865 ediciones en un período de 10 años. En mi opinión, un miembro del staff debería tener un nivel de participación mucho más alto, especialmente en un proyecto tan valioso como OpenStreetMap.

Creo firmemente que para que OpenStreetMap Latinoamérica y el Caribe, y en particular Panamá, puedan alcanzar su máximo potencial, es necesario revisar y posiblemente reestructurar la junta directiva y el equipo de staff. La comunidad merece líderes que no solo dicten qué hacer, sino que también inspiren y motiven a los colaboradores.

Agradezco su atención a este asunto y espero que se tomen las medidas necesarias para mejorar la eficiencia y el compromiso del staff.

Atentamente,

Roberto Franco
AdministradorDelMapa
jeslop (2024-12-02 16:32:19+00:00): Hola Roberto. Veo que no has tenido ningún interés en conocer previamente que es la OSMF, su funcionamiento y sus secciones. Obviando tus argumentos "ad hominem", la labor del Data Working Group no es incentivar a los colaboradores, es la resolución de problemas de violación de derechos de autor, disputas, vandalismo y bots, más allá de los medios normales de la comunidad; ayudar a establecer la política de datos; detectar y detener el vandalismo y las importaciones que no cumplan las directrices.

Para otras cuestiones puedes dirigirte a la propia fundación, a tu grupo local o a la instancia que consideres más oportuna.

Agradezco también tu intervención y te pediría que no saques la conversación del punto que aquí nos ocupa, y que cumplas los términos de uso y la spolíticas que aceptaste cuando te diste de alta en OSM.

Saludos,

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
Franco-PTY (2024-12-02 17:27:30+00:00): tranquilo, ya te reporté y cree un tema referente a ti:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/queja-sobre-el-staff-en-panama/122466
Franco-PTY (2024-12-02 17:31:04+00:00): ya vi que Mario también tiene un reporte
TrickyFoxy (2024-12-01 12:50:43+00:00): Кажется вы ошиблись, объединив точку с водой и УМВД
smithkm (2025-04-07 21:14:58+00:00): You set the branch of Pandora south of the green and the U turn lanes to 30 in this change but the official city map shows that's still a future change. https://vicmap.maps.arcgis.com/apps/instant/basic/index.html?appid=76f214f9e13245d9b30d06fcc4b16d7e

Did you see actual signs in place and the official map is out of date?
Syl (2024-12-01 08:23:42+00:00): Bonjour, lorsqu'on ajoute des building:part on doit laisser les attributs qui sont sur le bâtiment complet (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:building:part#Comment_utiliser).
Ce bâtiment doit donc garder le nombre de niveaux maximum : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/722857242/history
Toto2642 (2024-12-03 05:39:48+00:00): Bonjour, il me semble qu’en plus tu me l’avais déjà dit pour les tours de la rue de la Montat.
Merci à toi et en effet, bien vu !
fortera_au (2024-12-02 00:01:08+00:00): Hey and welcome to OSM! One tip, buildings usually are square and while drawing that perfectly can be difficult, iD (and JOSM) both have a shortcut to square off buildings, just select it and hit the Q button, then double check to make sure it's all still matching up. Have fun mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159796772
wambacher (2024-12-02 11:27:23+00:00): Moin, 
die PLZ von Tolk ist 24984 und nicht 24898.

https://postcode.wambachers-osm.website/?map=14/54.584938/9.638489&base=OSM&data=PCBDE,PCDE,WPCDE
Kannst auch gern auf https://www.postdirekt.de/plzserver/ prüfen

Gruß
walter
Zartbitter (2024-12-02 12:03:02+00:00): Danke für die Korrektur. Habe mich anscheinend bei sechs Adressen vertippt.
wambacher (2024-12-02 12:14:26+00:00): Nicht ganz. Gestern waren hier auch einige andere PLZ falsch.

Ich schreibe Kollegen eigentlich nur an, wenn solche Sachen an mehreren Tagen auftauchen. Meistens ist dann bei den Profis ein Makro fajsch.
Zartbitter (2024-12-02 14:16:56+00:00): War wohl ein Vertipper und Josm hat diesen Wert immer wieder schön angeboten. Wenn meine QA versagt muss ich das eben outsourcen ;-). Jedenfalls danke, so ist es wenigstens schnell korrigiert.
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2024-12-02 20:12:52+00:00): Speed cameras must be connected to the road, either by tagging it on a node on the road or by creating an enforement relational with both a "to" and a "from" node and the device.
Tatfahren (2024-12-01 10:12:05+00:00): Hallo JBR Jonas Braun,
könntest du das Feld zur Angabe eines Änderungssatzkommentars eventuell dazu nutzen, zu beschreiben was du genau geändert hast?, Du schreibst immer "Änderungen", was einem Punkt, oder einem Buchstabenmix gleichkommt, da es auch ohne Kommentar klar ist, denn was sollte man sonst in einem "Änderungssatz" machen als etwas zu ändern?

Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
Filip009CZ (2024-12-01 08:56:46+00:00): *source=#mapycz user report; website
eggie (2024-12-01 09:07:32+00:00): Hoi Jasper,

Ik heb de hele (niet-BAG) adresnode verwijderd. ..anders duplikaat.
Mapse
eggie
Mehrd@d (2024-12-31 07:44:56+00:00): ساخت ارتوز و  پروتز 
دست و پای مصنوعی در ارومیه
Mathias_ADAV (2024-12-10 10:00:36+00:00): Bonjour,

y-a t-il eu des travaux récent ou bien est on sur la même configuration sur les différentes imagerie ? Si c'est le cas, je passerais le highway path en trottoir (footway sidewalk) pas vraiment accessible aux cycles, puisque la piste renvoie sur la route et zone 30.
 
D'ailleurs la piste est avec un panneau B7b donc je la passerai en type voie verte (highway = path + bicycle = designated)
Mathias_ADAV (2024-12-10 10:01:18+00:00): Mais merci je n'avais pas connaissance de cet aménagement ! 
Bon mapping!
Mathias
Dimitar155 (2024-12-01 12:18:40+00:00): Благодаря за промяната! Може ли да отбележите и ул. "Оборище" в Кумарица? От сателитните снимки не виждам перпендикулярни улици на ул. "Иван Фелдшера", които да не са именувани.
eggie (2024-12-01 09:27:12+00:00): Jasper  Ik heb de node verwijderd.
Weet jij of die Losmstraat 3 op pand nr 36 ergens anders hoort. De nummering klopt hier niet.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-12-01 09:29:07+00:00): Adres van kledingwinkel Vila verwijderd.
Lomstraat 3 is ergens anders.
Groet
eggie