piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
MxxCon (2023-07-16 23:04:52+00:00): Hello.
Please link where this import was discussed and documented.

There are severe data quality problems in it.
MxxCon (2023-07-16 23:14:47+00:00): This changeset have been reverted in full due to severe data quality problems. Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines before doing any future imports.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138597728
38`9832|-77`0278 (2023-07-30 23:25:51+00:00): This is not a data import: I did this by hand in excel. It is clearly cited in the objects.
38`9832|-77`0278 (2023-07-30 23:26:16+00:00): To be clear, I checked each by hand.
MxxCon (2023-07-30 23:28:52+00:00): Well then, your checking was bad and it had too many problems.
MxxCon (2023-07-30 23:39:27+00:00): It doesn't matter that you used Excel. This is still undisclosed data import and you must follow what's written in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
Bauer33333 (2023-10-06 17:57:49+00:00): Hi, I have a question about the track east out of Baldwin: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1190049071
It has been tagged as siding and main, what it can't be at the same time. I would like to fix this so it renders on ORM, but for that I would need to know if it is the mainline continuing or really a siding starting at the switches?
Thank you
RailandSea (2023-10-06 18:18:38+00:00): It’s considered “signaled siding” its main track. I forget the ORM can’t do booth. I suppose it’s best to use main and just use the track ref tag to show what track is what. I have more to update for FSG just been busy
Bauer33333 (2023-10-07 17:34:51+00:00): Thank you! Don't worry, nothing here needs to be, or needs to be fast, were are here for fun
RicoElectrico (2023-12-22 15:05:25+00:00): Cześć, domyślam się po dacie, że Ta uwaga jest Twojego autorstwa https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3783902

Nie odbiorę Ci przyjemności jej zamknięcia :) Jeśli będziesz miał czas, to fajnie by było, aby jako lokalny mapowicz posprawdzać uwagi w okolicy. Włącz sobie warstwę uwag i przejrzyj.

Miłego dnia!
Note_Fixer (2023-07-16 21:53:25+00:00): demolition
emersonveenstra (2023-07-18 12:14:26+00:00): Hi,

waterway=spillway has been deprecated for a while now, could you please change these to the standard, shown here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:usage%3Dspillway

Thanks!
mikeocool (2023-08-01 15:00:37+00:00): Ahhh, not sure how I missed that deprecation notice. Thanks for fixing!
OddBunsen (2023-07-17 03:55:51+00:00): Hi, it's nice to see you mapping these buildings, but the way you tagged them is incorrect. This wiki page will have more information for how to tag hangars correctly.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dhangar
tyfi (2023-07-16 22:12:46+00:00): The "MO" prefix is used on the ways. It's the relation that we keep the prefix out of.
wolfshafen (2025-03-07 09:34:59+00:00): Hallo Akkurator,
für eine Rundwanderung Lanzenreuter Weiher - Rößler Weiher nutzte ich den Verbindungsweg zwischen Lanzenreute und der Kläranlage an der K7948 noch vor wenigen Monaten. In diesem Changeset hattest du diesen für Wanderer wichtigen Weg jedoch gelöscht, obwohl er zumindest zu jener Zeit definitiv noch existierte. Warum?
Gruß
wolfshafen
Akkurator (2025-03-07 13:22:09+00:00): Hallo wolfshafen,
geht es um dieses Wegstück?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/562259949
Das hab' ich wohl tatsächlich gelöscht:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=138597232
Ich bin mir dessen aber nicht bewusst, üblicherweise lösche ich auch nicht einfach, sondern markiere als disused o.ä. - vermutlich war das ein Versehen beim Editieren der Kläranlagen-Zufahrt.
Ich war damals zwar direkt an der Kläranlagen-Einfahrt, aber den Weg hinter der Brücke nach links hatte ich nicht weiter verfolgt, dort lag zu dem Zeitpunkt (2023-07) glaube ich ein Erdhaufen o.ä. Hindernis. Die Bilder dazu habe inzwischen wieder gelöscht, aber ich komme dort am Wochenende eh per Rad vorbei, werde das nochmal ansehen und ggf. einen partiellen Revert machen.

Vielen Dank für den Hinweis!
Akkurator
wolfshafen (2025-03-07 14:26:42+00:00): Ja, genau diesen Weg meine ich. Es kann sein, dass die Wegart (Feld-/Waldweg) nicht stimmte und sich hinter dem Erdhaufen nur ein unscheinbarer kleiner Pfad verbarg, daran kann ich mich jetzt nicht mehr erinnern. Vielen Dank für deine geplante Prüfung.
Akkurator (2025-03-07 18:51:22+00:00): Kleinen Schlenker aufm Heimweg gemacht:
Der Einstieg zum Weg ist von unten her kaum zu sehen, man muss von erst 2m Böschung hoch, um auf den eigentlichen Weg zu kommen - oder was davon übrig ist: wenig begangener Pfad mit weichem Grund, könnte mal ein Wirtschaftsweg gewesen sein, aber nicht mehr befahrbar und endet oberhalb der Kläranlage in Gebüsch.
Hab's wieder eingetragen:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163339514
Danke nochmal für den Hinweis!
wolfshafen (2025-03-07 21:26:18+00:00): Vielen Dank für Bestätigung und Korrektur. Kann natürlich sein, dass der Weg nur deshalb wenig begangen wurde, weil er nicht mehr in der Karte zu finden war. Vielleicht taucht er ja mal auf der einen oder anderen Offroad-Touren-Plattform auf...
Akkurator (2025-03-07 22:28:59+00:00): Da waren auch Waldarbeiten im Gange. Äste auf dem Weg. Äste auf dem Weg, ein umgestürzter Baum, etc.
Vinber-Pro (2023-07-20 13:59:44+00:00): Hello,
are you sure for this https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/200769943 I think it's a camp_site with caravan_site but not only a caravan_site ?
Best
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2023-07-20 15:11:06+00:00): The wiki for caravan_site says:

==
They may also have some space for tents. If a site is primarily for tents, it should be tagged as tourism=camp_site. If tents are allowed on a site it should be tagged with tents=yes. 
==

And the site is tagged with tents=yes.

It is operated by https://www.campingcarpark.com/fr_FR/
Which on it website presents itself as:

"CAMPING-CAR PARK, the 1st European network of stopover sites and services areas"

On the website it says that it is open for motorhomes all year, and can take tents and caravans in the high season.

On the aerial images I can see only motorhomes  

So I am sure that  it is a caravan_site.
Vinber-Pro (2023-07-20 16:00:02+00:00): thanks for your detailled answer, i think your right, i discover this.
Vinber-Pro (2023-07-21 07:54:00+00:00): i asked advice to a touristic professional, who explain :
- a part is use for caravans site, open all the year
- but it's always a camp site in legal point of view

i don't know best way to this.
- What you do with tent=yes
- two objects with there own opening hours, ...
- ...
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2023-07-21 12:01:29+00:00): We are not mapping legal definitions. 

And that would extremely difficult. I do not know the French laws and regulations. But in Denmark many caravan sites are considered camping sites according to the camping regulations, even if tents are not allowed. But that depends on whether the parking (but not services) is commercial, the number of plots (less than 4 on farms is usually not camping, permits, exceptions etc).
In fact stellplatz's are normally considered camping in Denmark. The 450 CAMPING-CAR PARK sites would legally be camp sites in Denmark even if most of them only accepts motorhomes and not tents.
  
What matters for data consumers/users is whether it is a place for motorhomes or a camping site. There can be some grey ares, but then we pick the best match.

And btw we have the same issue with tourism=chalet many of which are incorrectly tagged as tourism=camp_site even if you cannot use our own tent, caravans or RV's.
Vinber-Pro (2023-07-21 12:26:55+00:00): > We are not mapping legal definitions. 
yes i'm agree, 

i will try to know if we can separate two differents areas, a camp_site and a caravan_site (an example https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/234541707 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/768113855)

> What matters for data consumers/users is whether it is a place for motorhomes or a camping site. There can be some grey ares, but then we pick the best match.

i phoned them -> 47 caravans and 43 tents. it's a beautiful grey :)

harmful regards
dónal (2023-08-06 12:03:19+00:00): Thank you for adding an AED to OpenStreetMap. :)
hrhino (2023-07-17 18:54:57+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM! This changeset looks great, except I'd like to point out that areas representing buildings shouldn't overlap. It seems like the building on Bliss Road at the NE corner of this changeset is one large building made up of two segments; it should probably be mapped as one continuous way. Thanks!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138597478
Rui CT7ALW (2023-07-18 10:03:02+00:00): Olá Miguel,

Changesets como este tem apagado uma série de caminhos válidos. Isto tem sido feito por acidente?

Convido-te ainda a juntares-te ao nosso canal de Telegram, onde é possível ter uma conversa mais ágil: https://t.me/OSMPortugal
38`9832|-77`0278 (2023-07-30 23:27:55+00:00): You must note what the data quality problems are: I have checked each and left the ones that looked good to me.
MxxCon (2023-07-30 23:31:55+00:00): phone numbers were in the wrong format or corrupted or mushed together.
websites were in the wrong format. without protocol or just completely wrong.
there were other tags with a ton of stuffed keywords... more like for seo rather than anything useful
many biz names were not normalized.

like wtf is this... produce=apples;fruit and tree nuts;peach;pear;raspberry;tree nut;herbs and spices;beef;beef cows;lamb;mutton;sheep;honey;chicken;eggs;turkeys;asparagus;cucumber;eggplant;lettuce;mushrooms;potato;squash;tomato
product=hay;honeybees;horses;agritourism
38`9832|-77`0278 (2023-07-30 23:58:11+00:00): Phone numbers are in American or international format, as I entered them. I enjoin you to point out a phone number format you would not know how to call.

Website are as I wrote them. "www.website.com" means the website. I implore you to point out a website you would not know how to visit.

Yes, they aren't all the same format, because I did them by hand.

If someone's biz name is all upper case, then that's what they call their business. See many good restaurants in NYC with all uppercase names.

I listed those produces because that is was the farm produces. Anyone, like me sometimes, who is traveling and who searches on turbo will be able to find the places where a particular produce is sold.

These farmers have taken the time to list out the products they produce, and people like me want to know where we can find them, and I have taken several days of my time to enter them.

I want to take a moment to acknowledge your tone. I'm from a background that usually isn't welcomed on the internet, especially in very male places, and when you start talking like you did creates a very unwelcoming environment. For my sake an others like me, I would appreciate it if you used fewer "wtfs" and took a more constructive approach.
38`9832|-77`0278 (2023-07-31 00:04:44+00:00): I'd also like to provide more feedback, that your tone was hostile and harassing from the beginning. If you feel aggrieved, you are entitled to express frustration. But there's no reason to start that way out of the gate for the first major edit. I've spent hours on this and you've spent minute.
MxxCon (2023-07-31 00:24:33+00:00): The fact that you want me to point out wrong data to you means YOU don't even know what is in that import that you just blindly submitted. If you knew, you'd clearly see corrupted phone numbers, corrupted website addresses.
Just becuase some biz in your import had names in all caps doesn't mean those are actual real names of those biz. If you would've actually verified that data, you'd see that. Additionally, as documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names you supposed to Title Case normalize such biz names.

OSM is not intended to be a replacement for a menu or a catalog of what biz sells. Plus the values that you blindly imported are not only invalid, but also don't follow the guidelines of OSM values.

I used constructive approach with you before you went ahead and imported INVALID data into OSM for the 2nd time, and before you lied that you manually reviewed every single submission and before you lied that you manually submitted this data.

If that was the case, you wouldn't have these changesets on your account: 138592479, 138592481, 138592501, 138592509, 138592537, 138592566, 138592594, 138592771, 138595453, 138595472, 138595531, 138595609, 138595654, 138595786.

Such things don't just happen. You obviously used data-import tool without properly disclosing it.
Rui CT7ALW (2023-07-18 10:02:48+00:00): Olá Miguel,

Changesets como este tem apagado uma série de caminhos válidos. Isto tem sido feito por acidente?

Convido-te ainda a juntares-te ao nosso canal de Telegram, onde é possível ter uma conversa mais ágil: https://t.me/OSMPortugal
mueschel (2023-07-18 10:07:49+00:00): Hi,
you added the new tag "service:fee" in several places - what service does it refer to?
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2023-07-18 10:50:24+00:00): I am very open to suggestions for tagging this better.

I take "fee" to indicate whether a motorhome can stay overnight for free.

But you might have to pay for electricity, water, wastewater disposal, etc.

I try to tag this when I know it. But sometimes I just have e.g., a tourism website that says that you have to pay for services without specifying which services there are at the site and which of them you have to pay for. Sometimes you have to pay for all of them. Sometimes you have to pay for electricity, sometimes for both electricity and water. So I tag it with service:fee=yes.

Hopefully someone visiting a caravan_site will replace it with more specific tags.
MxxCon (2023-07-17 02:54:41+00:00): Hello.
Just like in the past you once again just blindly accept what AI detected without correcting obvious mistakes. 1190063433, 1190063420, 1190063443, 1190063406 are obviously separate buildings and should be mapped as such.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138598430
MxxCon (2023-07-17 02:56:20+00:00): In this change you also just blindly accepted what RapiD presented you without actually correcting highly inaccurate building shapes or mapping buildings as separate features.
Please correct this asap.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138598448
MxxCon (2023-07-17 02:57:39+00:00): This changeset also contains many buildings that should've been mapped separately and highly inaccurate shapes.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138598472
MxxCon (2023-07-17 02:59:27+00:00): In this changeset also buildings have been glued together like 1190063798 when it's actually many separate buildings and many are mapped with highly distorted shapes and alignments.
It is inappropriate to just blindly accept everything that AI detected without proper MANUAL review!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138598481
hrhino (2023-07-17 00:34:44+00:00): Woops, didn't mean to add review_requested=yes, not sure how I hit that.
MxxCon (2023-07-17 03:00:53+00:00): This changeset also contains glued buildings and incorrect building shapes.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138598570
o_andras (2023-07-17 00:42:34+00:00): It appears I changed "Linha Entre os Rios" (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1167426217). Looking at https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=138598683 it seems to be because it shares a node with Av. Doutor Leonardo Coimbra...
user_5359 (2023-07-18 10:49:20+00:00): Hello! Please take look on https://www.osm.org/node/11050183742. What is the mean of the tag ref:fca = 677217? What is the difference to ref:FCA (see http://www.osm.org/way/1190069389, http://www.osm.org/way/1190069485)?
John Grubb (2023-07-18 12:11:40+00:00): ref:fca is the businesses Financial Conduct Authority registration number. ref:FCA fixed to ref:fca.
MxxCon (2023-07-17 03:02:38+00:00): This changeset also has many misaligned buildings and buildings that should've been mapped separately.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138599017
MxxCon (2023-07-17 03:05:10+00:00): Extremely badly mapped buildings here! WTH is 1190070112?!
Why is 1190070097 mapped all the way into the road?!
You can NOT just blindly accept everything that RapiD presents to you and just accept it!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138599081
MxxCon (2023-07-17 03:07:43+00:00): Another changeset with inappropriately grouped buildings and ridiculously bad shapes like 1190070405
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138599129
Rui CT7ALW (2023-07-18 10:04:15+00:00): Olá Miguel,

Changesets como este tem apagado uma série de caminhos válidos. Isto tem sido feito por acidente?

Convido-te ainda a juntares-te ao nosso canal de Telegram, onde é possível ter uma conversa mais ágil: https://t.me/OSMPortugal
jtracey (2023-09-27 21:54:27+00:00): Are these features actually under construction currently, or are they merely proposed?
MxxCon (2023-07-17 03:09:20+00:00): Yet another changeset with bad building shapes and grouping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138599310
MxxCon (2023-07-17 03:11:34+00:00): Not only did you incorrectly grouped buildings, accepted wrong shape, but you also assigned wrong layer tag to the intersecting road! 1190071743
Just because editor complains about intersecting roads and buildings doesn't mean you should just blindly tag one is below the other. It has to be CORRECTLY resolved!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138599391
tyfi (2023-07-17 01:31:15+00:00): If there is no physical presence, then it doesn't belong on a map.
tyfi (2023-07-17 01:41:22+00:00): I think Coinos automatically places POIs when merchants join them to accept cryptocurrency.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-12-19 21:41:07+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145307978
MxxCon (2023-07-17 03:24:42+00:00): Hello.
When mapping square buildings you can right-click on them and select "Make Square" (shortcut key Q) to make the buildings have right angles.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138599733
Javierpf (2023-07-17 17:40:29+00:00): Hola Andrés. Veo que sos muy colaborativo y mantienes actualizado el proyecto. Gracias por ello. Este cambio ha quedado demasiado extenso pasando por varias provincias. Si las haces en áreas mas pequeñas es mas fácil para los revisores. Limitando a una sola provincia o ciudad el cambio ayudaría. Se puede encontrar más  razones en el siguiente articulo: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
AndresDuhour (2023-07-18 00:31:08+00:00): Hola Javier, muchas gracias. Lo revertí y separé los cambios. Ya quedó en una extensión geográfica más pequeña. Saludos! Andrés
Javierpf (2023-07-18 17:06:54+00:00): Gracias Andrés, sos un capo!.
Saludos
tyfi (2023-07-17 02:39:24+00:00): Also addressed note #3646245 O-SAKI
wireguy (2023-07-17 13:11:29+00:00): Hi Lex, welcome to osm!   I made some adjustments to square some corners, and offset the footprints.  I also added some addresses from the nad.  Check it out and if you have any q's, ask.
MxxCon (2023-07-31 00:13:27+00:00): The value of phone= tag is invalid as documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone#Usage
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138600471
MxxCon (2023-07-31 00:12:26+00:00): The values of both wikidata= and wikipedia:en= tags are invalid as documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikidata and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikipedia
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138600625
MrMerve (2023-07-20 00:07:46+00:00): Love to see the love for public transport!
Woazboat (2023-07-17 13:16:19+00:00): Hi, the wikidata=* tag should contain only the Q ID and not the full URL, e.g.:

`wikidata=Q7058982`

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikidata

Similarly, the wikipedia=* tag should only contain the language + page title code and not the URL, e.g.:

`wikipedia=en:Northern Stage`

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikipedia
dónal (2023-08-06 12:01:34+00:00): thank you!
wireguy (2023-07-17 13:17:31+00:00): Lex,  try to not delete and redraw buildings, because you loose it's history and possibly data.   The house at 130 Moore Street is missing the address info now.  Also 24 Hawthorne  Please correct.   fyi, you can see the deets at: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138600817
lex________ (2023-07-17 21:08:07+00:00): Thank you for the feedback Wireguy, have fixed the issues. Will look to avoid similar in the future.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138600817
user_5359 (2023-07-18 09:39:53+00:00): Hello! Please take a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1190082073/history. You add the booth tags 
building:levels = 2
buildings:level = 1 (notice your typo!)
What is the correct value?
λnko (2023-07-28 10:25:01+00:00): 你好，根据多方面观察，新光快速的性质应该算是高速，请悉知
Rukkhadevata (2023-07-28 10:29:46+00:00): 新光快速路是城市快速路，而城市快速路（没有高速公路编号）在交通法规中与高速公路并列，因此不能简单地将其标签改为高速公路。欢迎到相关社群与更多mapper交流～
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-11 23:35:01+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142455503
citrula (2023-07-17 09:54:16+00:00): Welcome to OSM!
arjunaraoc (2023-07-17 05:08:37+00:00): The way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1190085899 is not clearly visible from the imagery specified. If you are using local knowledge or GPS trace information can you add that as source.
kavig (2023-07-17 09:14:30+00:00): Thanks for highlighting this, our internal GPS traces (this cannot be shared) were leading to underground parking hence it was created, we are going to revert this edit.
arjunaraoc (2023-07-19 07:58:42+00:00): Can you update with URL of the changeset that reverted this?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138601635
kavig (2023-07-19 09:12:02+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138601635
Famlam (2023-07-28 20:46:07+00:00): Guten Tag, ich werde auf English schreiben weil mein Deutsch nicht so gut ist.

In three changesets (this one + 138596984 + 138596780) you have added the locations of former railway tracks.

The common consensus is to not add no longer verifiable items to OpenStreetMap (as these railway tracks have been removed decades ago and in most cases, there are no traces left anymore).
Secondly, even if there were traces that would justify abandoned railways, these traces usually do not have a gauge anymore (so this tag would have to be abandoned:gauge to make sense), unless i.e. sleepers are still present that contain gauge-indicating marks. 

Could you please indicate how the former tracks are still recognizable as fulfilling the conditions of railway=abandoned? In nearly all cases (the big exception being the Handelsweg, there you - indeed - even have some disused tracks, and possibly the way between parking "Oude stad" and the former yard) there is no trace of a former railway, using the sources that you used as well as my local knowledge. In case of abandoned, I would at least expect something like ballast or the sleepers, or as a bare minimum a path in the ground that wouldn't have existed without a train rail or for example a strange path between trees that cannot be logically explained otherwise.