piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2026-04-04 17:09:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 26 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/288826759 v4 | 9 crossings
https://osm.org/way/37196315 v22 | 9 crossings
https://osm.org/way/37196316 v25 | 8 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/317462256 v6

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180864833
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-06 06:53:36+00:00): Das unabsichtliche Verschieben einer Node wurde im Folgenden Changeset korrigiert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180915403
NeisBot (2026-04-04 17:18:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/11065225714 v5

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Kaffeehaus"
---
Zum Beispiel könnte eine neutralere und faktischere Version deines Textes lauten: "Kaffeehaus"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-12 22:33:06+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181251473
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
Everteal (2026-04-04 17:25:02+00:00): *et fusion d'un doublon que j'avais oublié d'envoyer.
TinPetreković (2026-04-14 17:35:23+00:00): Unnecessary alterations were undone in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181334740
lotug (2026-04-04 17:51:18+00:00): Updates include adding info to bus routes, matching route master info with the individual routes and across the bus routes, naming and spelling concistency.
iandees (2026-04-04 18:58:11+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6616729012 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180869273, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
tuxayo (2026-04-04 18:09:02+00:00): errata: source: bing streetside où on voir le panneau. Même en basse qualité, le 1er mot est trop cout pour être "impasse". Et "Rue" était dans BANO.
eggie (2026-04-04 18:47:26+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback Paden die opgegaan zijn in de natuur worden vaak eerst als disused:highway=path getagd. dat voorkomt opnieuw intekenen door medemappers.
Een zo getagd pad zie niet op de kaart, maar is een aanwijzing om niet een nieuw pad in te tekenen. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-04-04 18:50:24+00:00): De witruimte heb ik verwijderd
De Pad (2026-04-08 20:04:37+00:00): Hallo Eggie, 
Dank voor je reactie. Dit pad is niet zozeer opgegaan in de natuur maar verwijderd door de beheerder. Het aansluitende deel is onlangs blijkbaar al verwijderd van OSM maar dit stukje was vergeten. Aan het andere uiteinde van het pad hangt ook een bordje van de terreinbeheerder met uitleg over de afsluiting.
Groet, De Pad
eggie (2026-04-08 20:16:52+00:00): Oke De Pad,
Verwijderd?  Bedoel je dat er geen pad meer is? 
Maar als een pad alleen  is afgesloten dan taggen we dat met access=no
We verwijderen dan niet het pad zelf. 

De hamvraag is dus .. Is het pad nog aanwezig en alleen maar afgesloten.
In dat geval moet het pad weer terug en met access=no worden getagd.

MVG
eggie
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-05 10:26:11+00:00): Hallo, willkommen bei OSM.

Ich glaube hier ist irgendwie etwas schiefgelaufen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1496235547

Der Weg besteht aus zwei identischen Knoten?

Viele Grüße
Linus2562 (2026-04-05 22:02:29+00:00): Hallo, danke für den Hinweis!

Ich bin noch relativ neu bei OpenStreetMap, daher kann es gut sein, dass mir hier ein Fehler unterlaufen ist. Der Weg wurde von mir eingetragen, da dort inzwischen ein kleiner Schotterweg auf dem Spielplatz verläuft, der die Bereiche verbindet.

Falls ich beim Einzeichnen etwas falsch gemacht habe (z. B. doppelte Knoten), entschuldige ich mich dafür. Ich bin für Hinweise dankbar und versuche, das entsprechend zu korrigieren.

Viele Grüße
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-06 06:56:16+00:00): Guten Morgen, danke für die Antwort.

Der von mir genannte Weg wurde bereits von einem anderen Beitragenden korrigiert.

Viele Grüße

#HappyMapping
bxl-forever (2026-04-04 19:32:31+00:00): Hello, Tibaut_devo.

I don’t want to discourage you in being overly critical but you seem extremely enthusiastic about changing a lot of things on OpenStreetMap on your first day.

You have produced more than 20 changesets in a few hours, I am trying to keep up with your rhythm and fix every mistake, and will call on other mappers to help with the repairs.

Can I please encourage you to read the comments that have been written under your changesets or examine how your changes have been altered.

About this one: Adding pedestrian crossings is fine but it is 10 times better to map the crossing information on the *node*.  Most routers will need this to work properly.  Adding the information on the crossing *way* is nice to have, but as a secondary action.

Please try to make sure that the changeset descriptions correctly match the content of your changes.  Although I am convinced you are editing in good faith, writing "I changed A" while editing "A+B+C+D" might cause some mappers to distrust you.

Thanks, and have a nice day.
Tibaut_devo (2026-04-06 07:53:24+00:00): Thank you for your comment. I will try to be more precise about what I change.
I appreciate the help you give me by explaining my mistakes. I will have a look at the other comment you left asap.

PS: The reason why I made so many changes the first day is because I use the Geovelo app that is based on OSM, so I already know where the mapping isn't up to date.
mapper6 (2026-04-06 14:16:43+00:00): As partes deste changeset próximas à Rua João Franco e à Avenida Eusébio Savaio apresentam características típicas de ajuste baseado em imagens aéreas (‘imagery alignment’).

O changeset/180326143 foi baseado em ‘ground-truth mapping’ (observação local).

Estas alterações foram parcialmente revertidas no changeset/180948426.
tguen (2026-04-07 02:56:51+00:00): material=multi_msterial is not a valid tag
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180869116
cyclist789 (2026-04-05 07:57:38+00:00): Please don't make edits to distant countries in the same changeset. It makes the History rectangle obnoxiously large.
3FMO (2026-04-06 14:45:01+00:00): Meneekö siis oikein että autolla reittitäessä reitti kulkee tämän alikulun kautta? Ei julkisella liikenteellä, vaan autolla.
Sakari_N (2026-04-06 17:37:06+00:00): No ei :D Korjasin tähän nyt motor_vehicle=no + bus=private, koska tästä ei tosiaan ole bussillakaan ajo-oikeutta kuin poikkeustapauksessa.

Permit on muuten melko lavea ehto, ja siksi reititys varmaan sallii sen: "Open only to people who have obtained a permit granting them access, but permit is ordinarily granted. If permit is hard to obtain, then it is typically access=private. " https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
jm428 (2026-04-06 01:55:49+00:00): why did you remove the website?
StreetSurveyor (2026-04-06 05:13:14+00:00): The website tag was flagged by OSM as having an invalid URL.
jm428 (2026-04-06 14:35:00+00:00): oh yeah, the url didn't start with https:// but it still worked fine when I pasted it into my browser so I updated the URL. I think whenever possible we should try to fix things like this rather than just removing the information.
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-05 07:05:15+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180878959
Anas masuris (2026-04-05 09:07:21+00:00): Do wskaźników typu `snowplow` należy dodać `railway:signal:snowplow=PL-PKP:w13` (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:OpenRailwayMap/Tagging_in_Poland/Pointers#W_13_%E2%80%94_wska%C5%BAnik_torowy, wiki ma jakiś problem i nie pokazuje obrazków xd)
Anas masuris (2026-04-05 09:10:01+00:00): A nie, tylko na jednym brakowało xd Tak to jest OK
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-05 07:05:04+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180878959
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-05 07:04:55+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180878959
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-05 07:04:48+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180878959
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-05 07:04:36+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180878959
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-05 07:02:14+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180878959
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-05 07:02:39+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180878959
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-05 07:02:57+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180878959
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-05 07:03:27+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180878959
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-05 07:03:46+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180878959
eggie (2026-04-04 20:42:52+00:00): Hi Pentaginia,

Please don't use name=  to describe something.
name=Bungalow, Windrad, amenity=Schranke (German??).
Akk these names will render on the map. 

All tagging is in UK English and ccording the wiki format.
Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2026-04-04 20:52:40+00:00): I removed the invalid tagging.
Please read the wiki
Greetz,
eggie
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-05 07:04:02+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180878959
Dimitar155 (2026-05-30 20:02:04+00:00): Не виждам смисъл от преместването на всички данни за цкб в disused:. После остават, като се промени на нов обект. Ако наистина смяташ че е нужно, може да оставиш с disused само основни таг и едно от имената.
Fraxi (2026-05-30 20:21:45+00:00): Пише в уикито:
Add the namespace disused:*=* as a prefix to ALL keys which are no longer relevant to the current state of an object. You should treat ALL the tags on an object as a set of facts about the object, and prefix the keys of those facts which are no longer true as a result of the disuse.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused:*
Сиигурно ми се е видяло помещението не просто като скоро освободено, а по-отдавна към занемарено и сигурно затова съм предпочел тага.
Dimitar155 (2026-05-31 05:39:01+00:00): Занемарените ги пиша директно вакантни. Никой няма да плаща наем, само за да държи помещение за магазин затворено. В най-лошия случай са затворили временно поради ремонт, но и тогава лесно може да се върне само промяната на елемента.
Fraxi (2026-05-31 12:12:00+00:00): Виж какво, няма да стане така. Мисля да продължа да си ги отбелязвам както реша, нито противоречи на общоприетите практики според уикито, нито нищо. Да, тагването на други тагове освен основния и този с името с prefix disused може и да е излишно, но това го обяснявай на написали страницата. Освен това не е неправилно вакантен обект да се отбележи и като disused. В същата страница пише:
Examples include VACANT or boarded-up dusty shop buildings or unused parking lots. По-надолу  "A closed-down shop..."
Освен това в ED има опция "Mark it defunct", с което много по-бързо става, отколкото да търся shop=vacant. Питай zverik защо такава опция е добавил в програмата, а не за shop=vacant.  Няма да се наложиш! Ако не ти харесва и считаш подобни отбелязвания като неправилни, ти ги променяй.
Fraxi (2026-05-31 12:14:29+00:00): Безсмислен спор. Не е трудно да се изтрият излишните тагове.
Dimitar155 (2026-05-31 14:36:53+00:00): Само споделям мнение. Конкретно тук го промених, понеже вече няма никаква следа от ЦКБ. Нито табела, нито бележка на входа. Може да е било различно, когато ти си минал.

Иначе това което ме бърка, е че в ED излиза като банка, а в действителност няма никой. Ако не съм виждал офиса преди, едва ли ще се сетя че е точно той.

Иначе е хубава идея да има и бутон "mark as vacant", ще го предложа на Илия.
Fraxi (2026-05-31 15:16:11+00:00): "Иначе това което ме бърка, е че в ED излиза като банка, а в действителност няма никой. " Това е важно уточнение.

Може и затова да създадеш issue в  github, ако искаш :) Един пример - https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1699496664/
Всичко без датата на проверка е с представка disused
В ED ми се появява като pharmacy, но задраскано. Не пише "Ривафарм"
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-05 07:04:09+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180878959
ralley (2026-04-04 20:10:28+00:00): Source was actually local knowledge; LINZ Aerial Imagery
StC (2026-04-05 08:20:08+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre qui passe par là. Je m'occupe de la réparation.

Par ailleurs, des commentaires plus ciblés seraient appréciés. "Bras" n'est pas beaucoup plus utile aux autres contributeurs que "changeset"...
Jrachi (2026-04-05 10:39:22+00:00): Ciao.
Mi potresti gentilmente tradurre in italiano il tuo commento?
Non riesco a capirne il significato
HeyRayReh (2026-04-04 20:41:00+00:00): Oops forgot to include a source, specifically for the boundary of Discovery park: https://maps.santa-clarita.com/portal/apps/experiencebuilder/experience/?id=7f275ba8a6c540ceba02e3b177187a44#widget_57=center:-13189454.0337907%2C4086007.1532402644%2C102100,scale:4513.988705
NeisBot (2026-04-04 20:48:39+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 10 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1496277267 v1 | 5 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180872675
NeisReview (2026-04-12 22:33:07+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/180889295
kiritimati_c7g (2026-04-04 20:49:58+00:00): *fix lake erie outline along breakwater beach
felipeeugenio (2026-04-05 15:19:50+00:00): Buena.
por favor agregar access=private, en caso de ser provados. Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180872942
Yunan973 (2026-04-05 22:54:50+00:00): Bonjour,

les membres d'un multipolygonesdoivent obligatoirement avoir un rôle outer ou inner.
J'ai corrigé quelques unes de tes erreurs, mais il y en a trop, merci de corriger tous tes multipolygones.
Fraxi (2026-04-04 21:04:49+00:00): Мерси!
mavl (2026-04-06 13:27:03+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок добавляет точки лежачих полицеских возле дороги. Эти точки должны быть частью линии дороги.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:traffic_calming  
   
В других пакетах правок такая же проблема.
blu256 (2026-04-17 05:40:06+00:00): 9765313280 Είναι σίγουρο ότι το βενζινάδικο είναι ακόμη ΕΚΟ? Γιατί τελευταία φορά τελευταία που είχα περάσει πρέπει να είχε αλλάξει σε Revoil.
ViewStreet (2026-04-17 06:32:01+00:00): If you are sure you may update it
eggie (2026-04-05 06:13:55+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  Je edits zal ik even doorsturen naar een van de OV mappers. OV routebewerking  is een aparte tak van 'sport' binnen OSM.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-04-05 07:56:55+00:00): Editor ID is niet geschikt om routerelaties te bewerken.
Je zult dan moeten overstappen naar editor Josm.
Leo Slager (2026-04-06 11:41:56+00:00): Hallo Nanderv,

Kan helaas tijdelijk niet reageren op het forum.
Zoals vaker in OSM lijkt het makkelijk, maar er ligt een heel scala aan regeltjes onder.
Ik zal de tegenrichting van bus 21 ook nog toevoegen.
Goed om te weten is, dat de editor iD niet kan omgaan met de juiste volgorde van de elementen die deel uitmaken van een relatie.
Een nieuwe halte of een andere route leidt dan altijd tot foutmeldingen omdat de items niet in de juiste volgorde in de relatie staan.
Verder worden de 2 routes opgenomen in de hoofdroute en de hoofdroute wordt weer opgenomen in de relatie van de concessie.

Zeker voor een beginnend mapper is dat te hoog gegrepen. Als je serieus met routerelaties wilt beginnen dan moet je overstappen naar de editor JOSM. Dan heb je een speciaal bewerkingsvenster tot je beschikking en kun je de haltes en de wgen in de juiste volgorde zetten.

Veel plezier met verder mappen.
Nanderv (2026-04-06 12:32:45+00:00): Hi,
Ik had gisteren nog geprobeerd JOSM werkend te krijgen, maar liep tegen allemaal oauth-foutmeldingen aan. Dat leek te veel op mijn 'baan', dus ik had dat opgegeven.
eggie (2026-04-07 08:00:24+00:00): Tip Gebruik OAuth 2.0  bij OSM Serverinstellingen 
Druk F12 en kijk bij de OSM serverinstelling.
Tja...   OSM is soms ook een beetje een baan. 
Verder kun je hulp op het forum krijgen. Dan gaat het vast lukken. 
MVG
eggie
keyyushi (2026-04-13 21:26:56+00:00): Merhaba, silinen yolu ( way/1382869475 ) hala orada olduğundan dolayı tekrar ekledim. Eğer bir yanlışlık varsa lütfen belirtin.
Ejeoxlac (2026-04-10 02:08:05+00:00): El nombre no es Calle Pirito 2?
BigKev97 (2026-04-10 18:59:35+00:00): El nombre correcto es "Píritu". "Pirito" es un nombre incorrecto.
Ejeoxlac (2026-04-11 02:13:33+00:00): Haciendo referencia al árbol Píritu?, pregunto por que en Google Maps aparece con el otro nombre, igualmente casi siempre no son precisos.
NeisBot (2026-04-05 00:16:17+00:00): 🌍 Welcome to OSM, Yews_cash.
Thanks for contributing!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

✅ Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added ALPR surveillance point with direction 248"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment
nevw (2026-04-05 02:36:40+00:00): Hi, can you drag this accidentally dragged node back to where it belongs. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8913570657#map=16/-33.77444/150.64323
Wildsharky (2026-04-07 03:52:47+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:180940972
NeisBot (2026-04-05 01:39:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13706950761 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Service Station"

#MapWithoutSpam
Wildsharky (2026-04-07 03:54:05+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:180941399
felipeeugenio (2026-04-05 14:46:06+00:00): Hola. Puede cuadrar las casas con la letra Q. Ademas, puede copiar y pegar los polígonos.

Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180878783
ajmat (2026-04-07 04:13:09+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: 180977083
felipeeugenio (2026-04-05 14:10:09+00:00): Hola. Si son dos torres, hay que dibujarlas separadas y no juntar los nombres. saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180879733
Salomon Curico (2026-04-08 00:19:29+00:00): OK gracias
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180879733
felipeeugenio (2026-04-05 14:19:58+00:00): Hola. La calle de doble calzada es parte del condominio?
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180879775
Salomon Curico (2026-04-08 00:18:50+00:00): No pero gracias por mejorar la edición, yo no pude
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180879775
felipeeugenio (2026-04-08 12:47:34+00:00): vale, no hay problemas.

Hay un chat nacional de maperos de OSM en Telegram en el link en mi perfil.
Bienvenido si quiere unirse.
Wildsharky (2026-04-07 03:55:01+00:00):  Reverted in changeset id:180976552
NeisBot (2026-04-05 05:24:47+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13680626993 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Cryotherapy studio"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisAgent (2026-04-05 10:33:12+00:00): 🕵 The changeset tags appear to reference Google as a data source.

Please note that using Google Maps, Google Street View, or similar Google services as a mapping source is not allowed in OpenStreetMap due to license restrictions.

More information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google

If the data in this changeset was derived from Google or another incompatible source, the edits may need to be reverted.

If this is a misunderstanding and the data was collected from permitted sources (e.g. local survey, Bing imagery, local knowledge, etc.), please clarify in a reply.
cdeforce (2026-04-07 17:57:23+00:00): This is a misunderstanding. The information is sourced from myself based on local knowledge, but can be verified via other sources. Apologies for the misunderstanding.
cdeforce (2026-04-07 17:59:41+00:00): Yes, I'll update the description now
mueschel (2026-04-12 12:22:07+00:00): Does "open area" mean you can sit outside? That would be "outdoor_seating=yes".
Mjquinaso (2026-04-05 05:48:03+00:00): This is the correct pin and description
NeisBot (2026-04-05 05:48:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/907893943 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Espresso shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
MappingMore (2026-04-08 05:02:39+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:181029591
AudriusU (2026-07-19 18:58:02+00:00): Lauką suaria pavasariais, o vasarą kasmet technika kelią vėl pravažinėja toje pačioje vietoje. Šiuo metu kelias aiškus ir važiuojamas (grade4). Siūlau atstatyti žymėjimą ir pridėti seasonal=summer, autumn ir galbūt intermittent=yes
Aurelijus Visagurskis (2026-07-20 10:10:16+00:00): Sveiki, būtinai pakeisiu, jai taip nutiko, bet pirma pats turiu pamatyt, nedarau "aklų" pakeitimų.