piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2023-04-23 16:01:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:03:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:12:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:54:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:49:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:58:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:55:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:05:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:52:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:57:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:55:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:56:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:48:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:12:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:08:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:01:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:54:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:10:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:50:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:53:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:07:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:56:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:53:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:54:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:12:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:49:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
Benoît C MdP (2023-03-08 16:14:03+00:00): Bonjour  taquiahm,

Quelle est la source de ta contribution ? Sauf erreur de ma part, c'est bien une rue piétonne sur le terrain.

Bonne continuation

Benoît
taquiahm (2023-03-10 05:52:05+00:00): Hi,
We appreciate you reviewing the changeset and alerting us to this. Due to some internal technical issues I accidently made some wrong edits. I have reverted the edits in the changeset 133029040,133503684 and will ensure that such errors do not flow from our end. We appreciate your feedback.
Regards,taquiahm
Benoît C MdP (2023-03-13 09:47:51+00:00): Parfait !!

Benoît
mavl (2023-04-23 16:03:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:04:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:55:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:07:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
Benoît C MdP (2023-03-15 11:10:03+00:00): Bonjour Taquiahm

Je pense que ta source de donnée n'est pas récente car ce sont bien des aires piétonnes. 

J'ai fait un revert

Bonne continuation

Benoît
taquiahm (2023-03-16 06:17:05+00:00): Hi BenoÃ®t,
Thank you for reviewing the changeset and making the necessary corrections. This happened due to a technical issue. Going forward,we will ensure that such errors do not flow from our end. Thanks once again for fixing the issue and looking forward to learn more from you.
Regards,
taquiahm
mavl (2023-04-23 16:12:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:11:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:00:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:50:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:56:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:58:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:12:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
CurlingMan13 (2023-03-04 04:41:23+00:00): Please use more detailed changeset comments.  What did you do, and why.  What does "LCC" mean?
Udarian (2023-02-26 05:21:05+00:00): I also just generally updated land use in the area. 
as a note here, there is allot of construction work going on in the area between these two roads (Dolphin Expressway and Northwest 41st Street) on turnpike, so some parts may be different just due to that fact, it also means that even though I did use the most up to date imagery available on iD it is still out of date compared to the on the ground truth (by half a year or more from what I can tell) so what I have done here is not going to be 100% correct untill updated imagery is made available because I had to use the imagery and what I know to be there from personal knowledge of the area.
Udarian (2023-02-26 05:21:30+00:00): aka there is still allot of work to be done in the area.
MxxCon (2023-02-27 00:00:24+00:00): Hello.
There are a number of issues with your edit that you should be aware of.
If a business no longer there, instead of outright deleting it, it's much better to use lifecycle prefix as documented at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix or at the very least just delete business-specific info from that node but leave address info intact. That way you are preserving history of that object if there's ever a need to refer to it again, and this allows that address to still be searchable for other uses.
Also, you mapped Food Gallery 32, but it is already mapped as a different node. Please do not map features twice since that goes against https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element guideline.
Finally, I'm not sure what you tried to do with Dunkin there, but name=brand=Dunkin' doesn't seem correct.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133029392
Mundilfari (2023-02-27 03:50:56+00:00): Hey there - glad to see more routes getting converted to ptv2! Just one note - the order of the ways in the relation does matter - they should be in the order of travel. I notice you're using the iD editor; and if I remember it right from the few times I played with it, getting the relation's members in order isn't the easiest thing in iD (I use JOSM, which lets you spot gaps quite well). I've been cleaning up a lot of the unroutable  mess that many public transit relations in the area are lately. If you want me to get the order fixed before working on the PTv2 conversion of a particular route, please reach out any time. Thanks!
Zol87 (2023-03-07 05:12:21+00:00): Thank you for your help. I'm trying to learn JOSM, but' it's complex. I mostly use ID but Potlatch has some good features like the ability to selected all the nodes and ways for a relation which is how I duplicate these routes for each direction. I then go back to ID to manually move the stops in order but I think I may just find it easier to delete the ways and redraw them in order than to move the around.
Zandu (2023-11-16 15:03:49+00:00): These tags were moved from overlapping ways onto new relations. No tags were lost.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133029745
radiotrefoil (2023-02-26 10:41:38+00:00): Thanks for adding this - beat me to it! If you're interested I'm keeping track of renewable energy projects here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Feature_Catalogue/Renewable_Energy
Martini097 (2023-02-27 03:44:30+00:00): thanks for the link - the overpass query for each section is super handy
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133029762
Glassman (2023-02-27 17:11:33+00:00): These driveways exist and can and should be mapped in OSM. Can you please restore these driveways in this edit and your other one? Let me know if you have any questions.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133029916
Glassman (2023-03-01 22:07:54+00:00): I didn't hear back from you so I reverted this and your previous changeset. If you have issues with the edit being reverted, please let me know.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133029916
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-27 08:11:02+00:00): Please use more detailed changeset comments.  What did you change, and why?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133030107
mavl (2023-02-27 09:24:39+00:00): Здравствуйте. В названиях улиц нужно указывать слово "улица" - "Максимовская улица".  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BE%D0%B1_%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3
goodidea (2024-12-22 05:03:28+00:00): Kleine Info: deine Änderung des Keys "side" in "sides" bei traffic sign Knoten war nicht korrekt ... Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:side. Z.B. bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/263040422. Vielleicht checkst du solche Änderungen nochmal und machst sie rückgängig ... 
Viele Grüße!
Andrea Musuruane (2023-02-26 18:21:12+00:00): Ciao. Io ricordo che l'attraversamento a nord ha il segnale acustico (solo se in presenza di un non vedente) per indicare l'attraversamento. Qui si vede anche la sirena: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=476913156969917 Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133030488
Martj9 (2023-02-26 19:14:11+00:00): Ok correggo
bxl-forever (2023-02-26 08:31:13+00:00): Hello, Yaaaaaaaa:
I see your claim in your profile description to clear up every Osmose flag, but perhaps it would be wise to exercise good judgment before clicking on any "fix" option.

Here is an example: This should not be tagged with amenity=marketplace, this is just a street, there is no market here.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29106018

Hope this helps.
Yaaaaaaaa (2023-03-01 13:45:56+00:00): hi bxl, you're totally right, i should be more careful. I just removed the tag from the street.
thx for your feedback !
A67-A67 (2023-02-26 12:04:10+00:00): In deze wijziging wordt de correcte tag waterway=lock_gate verwijderd van de Keersluis Cuijk: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1446067370/history

De reden is onduidelijk.
A67-A67 (2023-02-26 12:05:30+00:00): Het lijkt dat deze wijziging massaal correcte feature-tags verwijderd: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=133030610

Dit is incorrect. Daarom zal ik de wijziging terugdraaien.
A67-A67 (2023-02-26 12:13:58+00:00): Aangezien een deel van de wijzigingen wel correct was, heb ik alleen de ten onrechte verwijderde feature-tags hersteld. Ook de foutieve wijziging van fee=yes naar toll=yes bij parkeerplaatsen heb ik teruggedraaid.
Yaaaaaaaa (2023-03-01 13:54:30+00:00): hi A67,
Osmose removes tags that are redundant. For example, waterway=lock_gate has been removed from the node because it already exists on the way.
jothishbabu (2023-10-28 17:41:19+00:00): Why did you deleted Vidya Engineering college main building ??
map per (2023-03-12 09:03:41+00:00): Hallo nilix,

ich würde geschlossene Geschäfte nicht löschen, sondern auf disused (1) setzen, weil in die leerstehenden Räume vermutlich bald ein neuer Laden einzieht.

Danke und viele Grüße
map per

(1) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused:*
MxxCon (2023-02-27 00:01:16+00:00): Is ILS not considered navigational aid?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133031409
geozeisig (2023-02-27 06:45:58+00:00): We use airmark=beacan for the ILS and for the lighting systems aeroway=navigationaid. Please read the Wiki pages again.

Otherwise, I agree with you that an ILS could also be called a navigational aid.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-03-25 02:23:38+00:00): Reverted by DWG for apparent vandalism, adding German names to items in Russia and strange comments: changeset/134090304
Fizzie-DWG (2023-03-25 02:23:44+00:00): Reverted by DWG for apparent vandalism, adding German names to items in Russia and strange comments: changeset/134090304
Fizzie-DWG (2023-03-25 02:23:50+00:00): Reverted by DWG for apparent vandalism, adding German names to items in Russia and strange comments: changeset/134090304
user_177389 (2023-02-26 10:02:34+00:00): Hallo,

nimmst du eigentlich auch den Validator von JOSM? Die Relation ist ungültig mit den verschwurbelten Mitgliedern.

Das Gebiet zwischen https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1148912962 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1149130158 muss nicht mittels inner members ausgespart werden. Entweder das Gebiet gehört zur AL10-Grenze, dann ist https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1149130158 outer und https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1149153496 inner - oder das Gebiet gehört nicht dazu, dann ist https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1148912962 outer und https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1149153496 kann/muss je nach Situation weggelassen werden oder auch outer sein.

Es wäre technisch auch nicht falsch, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1149153496 mehreren Relationen zuzuordnen, wenn das Gebiet zu mehreren Verwaltungseinheiten gehört. Man sollte aber nicht versuchen, irgendwas hinzubiegen und dabei ungültige Relationen zu erzeugen. Das macht diese je nach Vermögen des Renderers unbrauchbar, also nicht z.B. wenigstens die intakten Ringe vernünftig auszuwerten.

Beste Grüße,  
Mario
surveyor54 (2023-02-27 16:43:07+00:00): Ein aktuelles Beispiel wäre halt immer von Vorteil.
Ich glaube ich hab es kapiert.

Danke für die ausführliche Erklärung. 👍
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-02-27 20:01:28+00:00): Judging by aerials it's a pump track and bicycles are the main way to use them (you can "pump" with your weight instead of pedaling)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pump_track

cycling=pump_track seems to be used 313 times, don't see the reason to remove it. 
sport=cycling suited this better too than skateboards, though both can be present. 

Maybe someday I'll try to change pump tracks in Estonia to somewhat similar tagging. (my last change to track just added some tags)
PT-53 (2023-02-27 08:28:16+00:00): Hallo frankje,
der neue Feldweg ist auf den Maxar Premium-Luftbildern sichtbar und verläuft etwas anderst als von Dir eingezeichnet.
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Danke und Grüße.

PS: 
Für Fragen oder Anmerkungen bitte den Änderungssatz aufrufen und unterhalb Diskussion in das leere Feld eintragen. 

Schau Dir den Verlauf doch
frankje (2023-02-27 14:06:20+00:00): Ja, da hast Du Recht, danke. Ein Teil des südlichen Felds ist dem nördlichen zugeschlagen worden - die Grenzen habe ich dann gleich mit verschoben, außerdem den Waldstreifen in N-S-Richtung dem aktuellen Verlauf angepasst. (-> Änderungssatz 133089220)
Grüße
frankje
eggie (2023-02-26 09:06:09+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback.. 
Elk begin is moeilijk.. 
Hier is iets niet helemaal goed gegaan. Nu liggen er twee paden en zelfs een lege lijn zonder highwaytag over elkaar heen. Wat was je bedoeling? Het lijkt me beter dat ik je edits terugdraai. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-02-26 09:13:29+00:00): Reverted by changeset #133033574

Je edits heb ik even teruggezet.
Het vreemde is dat het stukje Rijksweg op slot staat met access=no
Je zou er dan toch niet als wandelaar kunnen komen. Wellicht is access=no hier verkeerd gebruikt?
Of mag je hier echt niet komen. Er loopt ook nog een 'onderbroken' wandelroute Doden- en godenlandschap overheen. 
Wellicht weet je hoe het zit? 
Groet
eggie
eggie (2023-02-26 09:45:40+00:00): Het stukje heb ik routeerbaar gemaakt voor wandelaars zodat het routeert naar de grafheuvels.
Voor motorvoertuigen staat het op slot. 
MVG
eggie
Hugoth (2023-02-26 11:28:14+00:00): Hoi Eggie, dat was nu juist wat ik wilde aanpassen. Maar aangezien ik nieuw ben is dat nogal fout gegaan.

Het pad onder het viaduct door is toegankelijk voor voetgangers.

Het veld waar de "potten" zijn getekend is ook toegankelijk maar daar zijn geen paden aanwezig. Dit is aangeduid als struingebied.

https://www.bezoekdemaashorst.nl/het-oergebied/oerschatten/paalgraven