piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
StrikeMind (2026-06-16 14:25:26+00:00): Thank you for finding this and the same similar mistake on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/498480861 They are both accidents. I have no idea how I managed to make the change. I've reverted the change on these two ways. Again, I apologize for making the silly mistake that caused you to have to do research on the potential accuracy of the changes.
Kovoschiz (2026-01-28 17:11:13+00:00): `name=` is for proper names, not descriptive titles. These `name=` should be official as in survey sheets.
Kovoschiz (2026-01-28 17:12:15+00:00): This should be `description=`
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-01-27 03:33:55+00:00): Merged 𝙪𝙣divided highways! *quintuple facepalm*
Taya_S (2026-01-27 07:44:54+00:00): Hi I've got a few questions and concerns about this changeset,

Why is this school mapped as a site relation?
Why is it also mapped as an office building? Wouldn't https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dschool or related fit better?

Why did you add the email and website link to this shopping centre you keep talking about? How is this relevant for a school?

Best regards,
Taya Snijder
NagaBazar (2026-05-12 07:53:26+00:00): Thank you for reviewing my edits. I understand the issue now. I have removed the unrelated shopping centre information and corrected the school tags. I am still learning OpenStreetMap editing and appreciate your guidance.
Bustycat (2026-01-27 04:52:53+00:00): OSM英語道路名稱（含「段」）不使用縮寫：
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan/Taiwan_tagging#%E5%91%BD%E5%90%8D
nfx2851 (2026-01-27 06:33:35+00:00): 感謝知會!
Sandal man (2026-01-27 06:11:30+00:00): Hello,
Thanks for contributing :-)
But please make smalle change sets, this helps others in tracking changes. 
Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thank you.
silversurfer83 (2026-01-27 19:08:07+00:00): Hi there :)

two things:

- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/147034172 what did you do here?

- please add access=private to obviously private pools. Thank you
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177745773
sykul (2026-01-28 09:25:04+00:00): Regarding https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/244081989
Could you explain why you deleted place=city?
Currently most places tagged place:CN=district are also tagged place=city because they exhibit all the features of a city. It's a quirk of Chinese administration that a large, isolated settlement like Wanzhou (which used to be administered as a city) can be administered as a mere 'district' of Chongqing even though the urban areas are not contiguous.

If, however, you think it shouldn't be tagged as place=city, could you please propose an alternative place= tag because place:CN= should be used alongside place=. 
Thanks.
NeisBot (2026-01-27 03:40:22+00:00): Hi jbrandback, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 85% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 2 natural(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177745828
NeisBot (2026-01-27 06:34:15+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 18 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/719604642 v4 | 11 crossings
https://osm.org/way/850109766 v5 | 7 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/7931194935 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177746025
spongeb0b (2026-01-27 04:26:48+00:00): Lancaster Park Community Centre was built last year, opened just before xmas, it does exist, removing demolished tag
Numbergod (2026-01-27 05:41:05+00:00): Whoops.  All good mate.  I just saw the error about the path crossing it, and knew the site had been pretty much cleared.  Totally happy you've caught and sorted it.  If you shift the path as well, it'll stop errorring and bringing attention to it.

Fun fact.  I've got the same birthday as Spongebob.  ;-)
spongeb0b (2026-01-27 06:35:15+00:00): All good, the single concrete footprint consists of two separate building structures with a single large roof canopy with a small gap between the structures as a walkway. I believe the building footprint is correct as well as the fact a path exists. If you want to adjust to better represent the situation feel free to do so
Numbergod (2026-01-27 06:46:59+00:00): No worries.  You're obviously more familiar with it than me.  I'll stick it on my list of things to investigate next time I'm passing.
Berdly (2026-02-01 03:05:58+00:00): Greetings, you seem to have great potential in the world of OSM mapping, but I warn of how you seemingly do not know how to square objects. To do this, press the q key or right-click the object in iD. Trust me, it really helps the mapping look a lot better. Also, read up on proper usage of place tags, as it seems you falsely reclassified a small unincorporated place within the borders of Paducah’s city proper to a city. I recommend reading this page on the OSM wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:place#Populated_settlements,_urban_and_rural
FajrAl (2026-01-27 11:14:21+00:00): Jalan di bawah flyover bukan termasuk tertiary. Lebih baik masuk residential.
FajrAl (2026-01-27 11:15:45+00:00): begitu pun dengan Jalan Citra Garden Serpong, lebih baik masuk residential
Rivai Sigit (2026-01-29 02:06:18+00:00): Tapi bukannya untuk Citra Garden Serpong penghubung suburbs semestinya Tertiary ya, Om Fajar?
Xvtn (2026-02-01 01:13:32+00:00): Wow, great info! Thanks for your contributions here!
mueschel (2026-02-03 19:09:07+00:00): What exactly did you try to map here? Watersheds usually follow some geological / topographical structures and are not nodes placed in a rectangular grid.
woodpeck_repair (2026-02-15 19:31:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 178596799, 178596800, 178596803, 178596812, 178596809, 178596807, 178596811, 178596817, 178596815 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import of 'micro watersheds'
Fraxi (2026-01-27 10:14:24+00:00): Здравейте!
Относно https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13503089307 (р-т Далас). Има стандарт за изписване на телефонните номера. Повече на https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone. В случая е редно да бъде +359 32 .... Коригирах го.
MassCartog (2026-01-27 05:12:00+00:00): Hi welcome to OSM. Could you explain why you removed this feature? Please use the changeset description to let others know why you are doing things, thanks
Kovoschiz (2026-01-28 17:20:50+00:00): 0. Please use meaningful upload comments
1. Please don't upload personal test data or similar
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-22 09:49:17+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam tags and also fixed POI name ALLCAPS in changeset 184423806

https://osm.org/changeset/184423806
NeisBot (2026-01-27 06:56:19+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13503136763 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Office building"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-04 06:37:48+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178079745
(No visible changes after review)
NeisBot (2026-01-27 06:56:20+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13475524518 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Dental clinic"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-02-04 06:37:49+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/177757175
mueschel (2026-01-27 18:45:31+00:00): Please check your edits. It's "building", not "buillding".
jhaluska80 (2026-02-06 02:26:19+00:00): Great job on the building outlines.
Sakari_N (2026-02-22 17:03:20+00:00): Moi ja tervetuloa muokkaamaan openstreetmappia!

Nyt tässä on lisätty koko hehtaarin kokoinen alue, jolle on annettu building=yes ja building:levels=2. Tämä tarkoittaa siis hehtaarin kokoista kaksikerroksista rakennusta, näin ei varmaankaan ole :D

Osoitteen voi lisätä esimerkiksi tontin "päärakennukseen" jolloin navigointi paikalle onnistuu. Tämän suuren rakennuksen voisi poistaa, koska sen alla on jo landuse=residential eli asuinaluettta kuvaava alue.
Vanishboy25 (2026-02-22 17:10:29+00:00): Aivan Loistava huomioi :D Kiiressä lisätty ja nähtävästi unohtunut kokonaisuus tarkastaa tarkemmin, pitääpä tarkemmin katsoa ensikerralla
lankapuhelin (2026-04-17 20:03:04+00:00): Muokkasin kuntoon https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181474601
NeisBot (2026-01-28 06:56:05+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13503252033 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "HVAC company office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-05 06:18:33+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178122982
(No visible changes after review)
Bike1 ALLEUR (2026-02-01 17:45:39+00:00): Bonjour, quand notre magasin de vélos sera t'il visible sur les cartes comme Strava ? Merci.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-27 09:47:42+00:00): Cleaned up SEO spam and other mistagging for Lucid Private Offices POI in changeset 184687512

https://osm.org/changeset/184687512
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-04-11 13:35:18+00:00): Hello!

You used
shop=furniturel;gift;houseware
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13503229346/history

Have you maybe meant
shop=furniture;gift;houseware
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
bob3bob3 (2026-04-12 22:20:34+00:00): yeah its a typo tnx Mateusz, fixed. The older I get the fatter my keyboard fingers are...
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-04-13 06:33:51+00:00): and thanks for a fix!
micheleOSM3 (2026-01-28 16:18:10+00:00): Ciao, non so se la tua modifica ha rotto questa relation: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18161249/history#map=14/46.41309/12.35076&layers=N 
Comunque mi aiuti a ricostruirla? Presumo che le immagini satellitari siano ormai vecchie e non siano utilizzabili, se tu conosci la zona forse potresti aiutarmi.
Pucciotrex30 (2026-01-28 16:22:01+00:00): Vedo di fare del mio meglio.

Comunque sono di Firenze ma ho già in ponte di passare di lì apposta l'estate prossima :))
col gps, intendo
micheleOSM3 (2026-01-28 16:25:45+00:00): Ok, grazie lo stesso, nel frattempo ho chiesto aiuto ad un altro mappatore che è intervenuto nella stessa zona del problema nelle ultime 24 ore.
bartgron (2026-01-27 17:16:33+00:00): Zestaw zmian wycofany:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177772207
Taka zmiana kategorii dróg musi być najpierw gdzieś przedyskutowana.
Pozdrawiam
Glassman (2026-01-28 19:12:59+00:00): beaches are normally added as polygons (areas) and not nodes. The tag should be natural=beach + name. Can you revisit this edit? I'll send more info on OSM in a message
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177751267
Glassman (2026-01-28 19:17:05+00:00): You added a polygon on top of the existing parking lot polygon. I removed the duplicate but saved you name and opening hours
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177751421
NeisBot (2026-01-28 06:56:09+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/272001648 v4

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Bar restaurant"
---
Na przykład, bardziej neutralna i obiektywna wersja Twojego tekstu mogłaby brzmieć: "Bar restauracja"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-02-05 06:18:34+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/177792425
Branko Kokanovic (2026-02-07 11:55:44+00:00): Zdravo? Sta ti znaci ovo "CK"? Zvanicno RGZ nema ovo ime ulice, a ako je ovaj put deo neke planinarske rute, bolje je da se napravi relacija, posto se tako oznacavaju planinarske staze, vec smo dosta sredjivali ovde: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Serbia/Projekti/PSS_staze

Javi da vidim da li da brisemo ime puta ili da pravimo relaciju?
Branko Kokanovic (2026-02-07 11:57:13+00:00): CK je od Crveni Krst? Dogovor je da ne stavljamo imena puteva koji su samo "od - do" jer je to jasno i to treba router da radi. Ako je ovo deo neke duze planinarske rute, javi da je ucrtamo kako treba!
Boris Smit (2026-02-07 12:02:52+00:00): Pozdrav, CK=Crveni Krst, izvinjavam se, dodao sam bio par staza ali nisam znao pravila oznacavanja, mozete ispraviti, sam put je ucrtan kako treba.
Branko Kokanovic (2026-02-07 12:07:48+00:00): Jasno, jasno. Samo unosi sta treba!:) Tu smo ako imas nekih pitanja oko OSM-a - koriscenja i menjanja. Na forumu https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/rs/64 i na Telegramu na https://t.me/osm_sr
t_ja (2026-01-27 21:16:00+00:00): Ahoj Filip,
tagovanie pre https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1471546520 nedava vyznam:
- ak je to miestna cesta, tak by mala byt pristupna minimalne pre pesich, a autom len pre tych, co tam byvaju, t.j. motor_vehicle=private,
- ak je tam zakazany pristup aj pre chodcov, tak to zjavne nie je miestna cesta, ale sukromna, cize by malo byt highway=service + service=driveway, spolu uz s existujucim access=private.

T.
Filip009CZ (2026-01-27 21:28:48+00:00): Ahoj, používateľ hlásil, že sa tam nedá prejsť, že je tam plot zo strany od VD, ktorý vidno aj na Ortofoto. Nevedel som ale vylúčiť, či sa nejedná o bránu. Pre potvrdenie som pozrel street view a he Tam zákaz aj pre chodcov https://www.google.com/maps/place/Moj%C5%A1+75,+010+01+Moj%C5%A1/@49.1987381,18.8189968,18z/data=!4m6!3m5!1s0x47145990894e6a81:0x1acb8f69e0c54e43!8m2!3d49.1990758!4d18.8192952!16s%2Fg%2F11c0yxc6bk?utm_campaign=ml-ardi-aht_2026&g_ep=Eg1tbF8yMDI2MDEyMV8wIJvbDyoASAJQAQ%3D%3D

Kľudne zmeň tagovanie, ako uznáš za vhodné, ale aby sa tam nedalo prejsť, či už autom, alebo aj pešo a bicyklom.

Prípadne mi môžeš napísať prečo si to tak upravil :)
t_ja (2026-01-27 21:40:41+00:00): Ano, zo strany VD je brana (https://maps.app.goo.gl/kfMrYmzwiPCFnymM6), a zo severnej strany je nielen znacka zakazu pre vsetky vozidla, ale aj dodatkova tabula "sukromny pozemok, vstup zakazany".
Preto som rozporoval, ze to zjavne nie je higway=residential, ale len higway=service. Takisto podla katastra su dane pozemky v sukromnom vlastnictve.

Highway=residential su obecne cesty, kde ked uz nie autom, tak minimalne pesi alebo na bicykli sa mozem pohybovat bez obmedzeni, co tato konkretna cesta veru nesplna.

T.
Glassman (2026-01-28 19:20:13+00:00): I think this should be tagged as tourism=viewpoint as a node. Also, I think this is actually part of Lake Washington Blvd park at least according to the city. You might want to look into expanding the park.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177751597
Langlaeufer (2026-01-27 09:13:15+00:00): Danke, da wurst du schneller als ich das selber erledigen konnte.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177751650
jhmfarshid (2026-01-29 05:56:38+00:00): درسته
NeisBot (2026-01-28 06:56:11+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13503352665 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Architecture studio"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-05 06:18:35+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178122984
(No visible changes after review)
Glassman (2026-01-27 21:36:06+00:00): Why did you tag this a layer=-1? It doesn't appear to be undergound, expecially since it connect to roads at each end of the way. Can you review this edit please.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177752285
NeisBot (2026-01-28 06:56:12+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13503385256 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "residential housing complex"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-05 06:18:35+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178122986
(No visible changes after review)
eggie (2026-01-27 17:01:13+00:00): Dag Ro,

De tags zijn niet des OSM's.
inzinkbaar paaltje..
bollard=rising 
motor_vehicle=designated   Waarom.
Dat betekent dat hier regulier autoverkeer mogelijk is.
Bedoel je wellicht destination? (bestemmingsverkeer) 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-01-27 17:04:48+00:00): designated heb ik aangepast naar destination
Taya_S (2026-01-27 09:10:23+00:00): Please see: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19669
Taya_S (2026-01-27 09:19:39+00:00): All edits have been reverted in: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177754239
NeisBot (2026-01-27 09:16:12+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your changesets and noticed that the cumulative count of your recent edits (5 changesets) shows that 326 of your last 365 changes were deletions. This is quite an unusual proportion, so I wanted to check with you.

Could you please confirm whether these deletions were intentional or if they may have occurred by mistake?

#DeletionsCheck #Cumulative
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?uid=23736505
BCNorwich (2026-01-28 07:35:21+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Unfortunately, all the motorway highways and most of the footpaths you've added are duplicating existing highways. Such duplication of highways could seriously disrupt routing. Thus, I've removed all the duplications.

It's OSM practice to amend or correct existing features, not map over the top of the feature to make duplicates. I very much doubt if there are motorways on the college grounds. Also the names added look more like descriptions rather than formal names.

If you need any help, please just ask.

Regards Bernard
NeisBot (2026-01-28 06:53:55+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 8 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/60990750 v8 | 6 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/763522115 v3
https://osm.org/node/763522112 v3

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177754498
NeisReview (2026-02-05 06:18:49+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/177815321
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-27 09:49:22+00:00): Cleaned up SEO spam and other mistagging for Lucid Private Offices POI in changeset 184687605

https://osm.org/changeset/184687605
mcliquid (2026-02-01 12:23:01+00:00): Hello ocapito, thank you for your edits with iD and for adding detailed local information.

A quick note about this changeset: it includes edits ranging from Thuringia (Germany) to Rochebaudin in France, which covers locations far apart. Even though the individual edits are valid, grouping such distant changes into a single changeset makes it harder for other mappers to review or understand what was changed where.

For future edits, please consider:

keeping each changeset focused on one local area or region,

uploading your changes before moving on to a different country or distant location,

creating separate changesets for edits in different regions.

More information is available here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for your understanding, and happy mapping!
ocapito (2026-02-02 21:49:42+00:00): Hi mcliquid,
thanks for the hint. I just started with direct mapping recently and your comment makes much sense to me. Sorry to not have informed myself enough beforehand and for the kind and patient explenation.
ToniE (2026-01-27 10:42:08+00:00): Yep, zumal im Park Fahrräder noch nicht einmal schieben darf.
NeisBot (2026-01-28 06:56:13+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13503613549 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Security office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-05 06:18:35+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178122987
(No visible changes after review)