piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Gregory Peony (2025-09-16 17:04:53+00:00): Hi, The building footprints you mapped here all represent buildings visible in imagery and are very accurate. You created some shared nodes with a river bank when adding them: hold alt in ID to prevent this. --- Please do not connect the corners of buildings to other buildings or features such as highways or residential areas. In the iD Editor, hold down the `Alt` key to prevent your cursor from snapping to existing data and accidentally creating shared(grey) nodes. This [video about connected nodes](https://youtu.be/ltn1VOiq5_0) has more information and a guide. --- Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172022840
Max-Kritic (2025-09-19 13:05:31+00:00): Les trottoirs sont en train d'être refaits.
custodiankeyy (2025-09-16 18:08:02+00:00): Merhaba, burada güncel olarak bir u dönüşü bulunuyor mu? 171957706 ID'li değişiklik setinde GPS verileri kullanılarak orada U dönüşü olmadığına karar verilmiş.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171957706
Fraxi (2025-09-30 19:59:28+00:00): Hi
Have you ever surveyed these streets? Because some of the data on this changeset(esp. on Borovo street) do not correspond to the reality. And in this moment there is a mess with the data about the existence and surfaces of the sidewalks. You could make a review with Bing Streetside from here(https://www.bing.com/maps?cp=42.669441%7E23.288054&lvl=17.0&v=2&sV=1&pi=-14.4&style=x&dir=135.9)at SE direction to Bulgaria boulevard. I'll have to make some fixes. The current situation (on the ground) isn't very different from the shown on Streetside photos.
Jorisbo (2025-10-01 06:05:34+00:00): Hello Fraxi, thank you for your message. I'm not familiar to the area, i only fixed typo's in access tagging for routing and in the meanwhile corrected some obvious alignments. Kind regards Joris
trigpoint (2025-09-17 08:23:52+00:00): These edits have been reverted after complaints made to the Data Working Group.
Please do not add such data which has the potential to put the occupants at risk to OSM in the future.
fs_LT (2025-09-29 07:16:07+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:%C3%84nderungssatz#R%C3%A4umliche_Ausdehnung_von_%C3%84nderungss%C3%A4tzen
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-12 06:52:35+00:00): Cleaned up remaining SEO spam and other tagging for Dogtopia POI in changeset 184001496

https://osm.org/changeset/184001496
nullroute (2025-09-16 19:36:55+00:00): Hello ICT_maps, it seems we are both pretty active in the Wichita area.

I have some concerns about how you map landuses. I noticed you frequently attach them to nodes on roadways and even to other features like power lines.

In OSM, roadways are mapped as a one-dimensional line which represents the center line of the roadway. Landuses by their nature represent areas. When you attach a landuse to the center of a roadway, you are implying the landuse extends out into the road which is a less accurate way to map the landuse.

I have also noticed sometimes you attach one or two of the nodes of the landuse to the roadway but skip adding all the in-between nodes on the roadway to the landuse. This can cause problems if someone comes in after you and tries to add an unmapped side street. When they click on the way which they think is the roadway but might in-fact be your landuse, the side road will be attached to the landuse and not the roadway. The only way to separate them would be to zoom in and very carefully attach the node to the correct way.

See this relevant page on the wiki:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dresidential#Separation_from_roads

> It is strongly discouraged to glue landuse to road lines. Glued landuse makes the data much harder to work with. It is better to have the landuse boundary stop at the edge of the road, the edge of right of way, or overlap the road completely if the same landuse continues on the other side.

Personally, I try to avoid attaching landuses to roadways whenever possible unless it is a special case condition where it makes sense as it tends to make the map more difficult to maintain for others.

In fact unless a feature clearly boarders another feature I try to avoid attaching them together entirely. This keeps each feature independent which makes the map easier to update and maintain. Especially if someone comes in after me to improve the accuracy of the map.

Obviously I am not perfect and I am sure some of my edits have problems. I don't think what you are doing is necessarily wrong, but I don't think it's the best practice. Let me know if you have any input or a different perspective on this.

Thanks,
nullroute
ICT_maps (2025-09-16 20:06:42+00:00): Thanks for the input. Some of them are years old mistakes at this point, but some are new. Going forward I'll try having most layers off for mapping landuses to help avoid any unintentional overlaps.
martien-176 (2025-09-16 16:58:51+00:00): Hi, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. You requested a review of your mappings. 

The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Most buildings do have right angled corners and we need our mapping to reflect that. Accurate building footprints are important because building sizes are often used to estimate population sizes for an area to conduct humanitarian activities. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. 

Please check out these sources for more info: 
- Buildings--> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o
- Roads--> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBLwb2nisJQ 
- https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit

Thanks so much for your contribution, Martien, HOT global validator.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172024700
eggie (2025-09-16 17:15:05+00:00): Dag M Archos.   De track stond gewoon op access=private en routeerde al niet. Het is niet nodig om paden van de kaart te halen die op private staan. 
Ze kunnen evt van belang zijn voor hulpdiensten. 

Wat is het probleem? 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-09-16 17:28:53+00:00): Aanvulling.. Kans dat een volgende mapper het weer intekent.. maar dan zonder access=private
Gr eggie
M Archos (2025-09-17 05:47:05+00:00): Als de hulpdiensten met trekkers komen, kunnen ze van het pad gebruik maken. Maar als de kans is dat een volgende mapper het weer terug zet, dan kan het beter zo blijven. Vandaar dat ik een review had aangevraagd en bedankt voor de hulp.
eggie (2025-09-17 05:55:20+00:00): Dag M Archos,

Het pad staat weer terug als privé track als laagste categorie grade5.
Dus nauwelijks zichtbaar.
Het zal niet routeren voor janenalleman. 

MVG
eggie
Gonéo (2025-09-17 12:38:17+00:00): OK merci pour la mise à jour. J'ai ajouté le DSC. La doc est ici https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bicycle#Bande_cyclable_sur_route_%C3%A0_sens_unique
Carto'Cité (2025-11-15 17:53:06+00:00): Bonjour Sébastien,
Tu as ajouté cette piste :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1430331688
Mais elle termine sur un chemin piéton non cyclables ici :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11495005431
Est-ce que tu peux me confirmer qu'il y a bien une piste qui a été construite ? Car je n'ai pas trouvé de trace de ce nouvel aménagement. Et si c'est le cas il faudra corriger pour que les calculateurs puissent l'utiliser.

Si tu passes dans le secteur, le mieux est de documenter ce type d'aménagement par des photos dans Panoramax avec l'application Baba par exemple.

Je reste à ta disposition si tu as des questions.

Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
sebastienserre (2025-11-16 09:55:31+00:00): Pareil que l'autre,je vais faire des photos. Cette piste est recente +-2 mois et se termine sur un petit rond point...
Carto'Cité (2025-11-16 10:49:59+00:00): Bonjour Sébastien,

Merci beaucoup pour tes retours ! C'est très gentil. Tu étais déjà utilisateur de Panoramax ?

Charles
sebastienserre (2025-11-16 11:50:01+00:00): oui j'ai deja ....3 photos :)
mais je decouvre la contrib OSM et tout n'est encore pas tres clair
Carto'Cité (2025-11-15 17:45:01+00:00): Bonjour Sébastien

Tu as décrit ce chemin comme une piste cyclables. Généralement les pistes cyclables (highway=cycleway) sont réservé pour les vraies pistes ; c'est à dire avec un panneau C113 ou B22a. Je corrige en simple chemin :)

Si tu passes dans le secteur, le mieux est de documenter ce type d'aménagement par des photos dans Panoramax avec l'application Baba par exemple.

Je reste à ta disposition si tu as des questions.

Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
sebastienserre (2025-11-16 09:52:37+00:00): Hello,
Effectivement, si on parle du chemin dans l'air de jeux, elle est emprunté par les cyclistes pour rejoindre la piste longeant la Route de Gambais depuis le Cimetiere.
sebastienserre (2025-11-16 09:53:18+00:00): je mets des photos sur Panoramax des que j 'y repasse (c'ets a 5kms de chez moi)
SomeoneElse (2026-01-17 15:09:05+00:00): Hello,
Not sure how it happened, but I suspect that https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13147807436 is a duplicate of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12857301617 (with a bit more info)?
zabop (2025-09-16 20:55:14+00:00): Please add meaningful changeset comments. "і" on its own is not meaningful.
deven_smith_ (2025-09-18 17:28:49+00:00): Hello, I noticed you tagged US 95 in the CDA area as an expressway. What is your reasoning for this change? There are too many ingress and egress points for the majority of this route
Joseph R P (2025-09-18 18:46:58+00:00): It's a limited-access highway, meaning it has no driveway access points, and most side-street intersections are RCUTs and RIROs. It's also a higher-speed, higher-capacity route for through traffic unlike a standard arterial road like Government Way.
deven_smith_ (2025-09-18 19:52:15+00:00): Hmmm, maybe its just because I am local but sometimes it is quicker to go up Government Way and not US 95 considering both have the same amount of lanes. Also considering how much traffic uses 95 at a given moment, its rare to go the speed limit for any amount of time until you get up past Hayden

I guess you would be technically right. I just assumed expressways would be similar to parts of US 95 north of CDA that are interstate like but not an interstate.
Hufkratzer (2025-09-16 20:37:38+00:00): Hi,
How depressing to see the Core Software Development Facilitator map such a small circular area as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1430348942 as a riding center! It should be tagged as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/704239918, IMHO. Here is an example of a real riding center: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1334627268.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1430348943 doesn't really look like a riding center to me either, just like a track with a fence around it.

Older, similar discussion from 2 years ago: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132702177
Minh Nguyen (2025-09-16 23:41:16+00:00): Thanks for catching my mistake again. Similar to last time, I searched for “cưỡi ngựa” and this was all that showed up. The translation for leisure=pitch sport=equestrian got renamed, so it was back to English again. I just updated the translation, so it should be back in the next release.

I fixed the mistagging in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172038103.
Gregory Peony (2025-09-25 13:26:05+00:00): Hello, you did a good job appropriately deleting the footprints in the NE, however the building footprints you added are not as accurate as they could be, and you even reduced the accuracy of an existing footprint here. This is mostly becasue you're including the Walls of buildings visible in the imagery as its taken from the West. 

When mapping with imagery captured at an angle, please position features where they are at ground level. You can map the outline of the roof and then reposition the building to the base of the walls. I recommend you watch this [video about mapping dense urban areas](https://youtu.be/JAPiGntG6fs) and read this [written guide](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Roof_modelling#Typical_errors_in_the_interpretation_of_roof_geometry_from_aerial_images).

See how I mapped some of the footprints in this area in https://osmcha.org/changesets/172440180

Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
renecha (2025-09-27 23:34:33+00:00): Bonjour,
Vous avez créer de nombreuses "highway=busway" à Lyon alors que ces voies de bus étaient déjà correctement cartographiés avec les attributs "busway=lane" sur la rue principale. "Highway=busway" est réservé aux voies de bus PHYSIQUEMENT séparées et dédiées à l'usage des bus ce qui n'est pas le cas rue Dusquene ou boulevard des Belges ! Merci donc d’arrêter ces modifications et de bien vouloir annuler vos modifications.
D'avance merci
Cèparlà (2025-09-28 09:33:37+00:00): Bonjour,
Ayé!
J’ai laissé les voies de bus physiquement séparées
A vouloir trop bien faire….on irrite certains!
Bien cordialement
aceman444 (2025-10-06 08:05:09+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13147966599 to je zaroven aj pamatnik/socha a zaroven aj nabozenska schranka? Ako to?
silversurfer83 (2025-09-16 19:29:01+00:00): passt so :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172030582
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-12 09:53:04+00:00): OpenStreetMap to nie jest miejsce na tymczasowe propozycje, a na realnie istniejące obiekty
dzamper (2025-09-16 21:14:43+00:00): Nie wiem co miałoby być złego ani w `highway=motorway_junction` na węzłach ani w `highway=primary_link` na zamkniętych łącznicach
:-} (2025-09-21 14:11:04+00:00): Czy tablice z nazwami węzłów są w terenie?
Dawid2849 (2025-09-21 14:14:25+00:00): Są: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171891861
𝙢𝙖𝙧𝙖𝙯𝙯𝙚𝙧 ദ്ദി ᗜˬᗜ✧ (2025-09-23 15:49:54+00:00): Są.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-09-16 19:41:11+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13148021744
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13148021746

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
StC (2025-09-22 12:35:25+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre qui passe par là. Je m'occupe de la réparation.
eggie (2025-09-16 19:49:51+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  Ik heb shop=forist dan ook verwijderd.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=172032322
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
habi (2025-09-17 07:33:38+00:00): Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap!

Schön machst du hier mit und hilfst, die Karte und die Kartendaten zu pflegen.

Danke für die Anpassung des Hotels.
Das Café nebendran ist noch mit "Albert und Frieda" erfasst: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2953918328
Ich nehme an, das ändert den Namen auch noch, oder?

Ich habe in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172048837 die Tags des Hotels etwas vereinfacht und duplizierte Informationen entdupliziert.

E Gruess usem Liebifäud,
habi

PS: Bei irgendwelchen Fragen gerne hier in den Kommentaren nachhaken oder bei https://c.osm.org/c/107 eine Diskussion eröffnen, wir versuchen gerne zu helfen
patricioperez (2025-09-17 07:57:33+00:00): Danke für deine Nachricht habi. 
Ich bin hier neu auf osm, deswegen bin ich sehr dankbar. 
Ich muss mich genau über die Situation beim Pêle-Mêle erkundigen, und ob das Café Albert&Frida richtig eingetragen ist, oder ob es sich um das Bistro von Pêle-Mêle handelt. 
Auf anderen Kartendiensten ist die Situation zwischen Altenbergstrasse 4 und Altenbergstrasse 6 auch nicht ganz klar ersichtlich. 

Sobald ich mehr weiss, werde ich die Informationen hier einpflegen.
Grüsse und Danke 
patricio
habi (2025-09-18 14:49:31+00:00): > Auf anderen Kartendiensten ist die Situation zwischen Altenbergstrasse 4 und Altenbergstrasse 6 auch nicht ganz klar ersichtlich.

Für OpenStreetMap dürfen *keine* anderen Kartendienste als Quelle verwendet werden.
Das Beste ist 'on-the-ground'-Beobachtung.
patricioperez (2025-09-18 20:11:58+00:00): Ja, so war mein Kommentar nicht gemeint. 
Meine Quelle sind die neuen Betreiber des Pêle-Mêle. 
Was ich meinte ist, dass das alte Hotel Albert&Frieda in den anderen Kartendiensten nicht richtig eingetragen ist, bzw. die Koordinaten sind falsch eingetragen oder die anderen Kartendienste können die Route auf Altenbergstrasse 4 nicht richtig berechnen und zeigen deswegen die Immobilie in 6 an (das ist eine Vermutung von mir, da das Haus 4 auch in einer anderen Farbe dargestellt wird in den anderen Kartendiensten).

Was ich klären will (und zwar bei meinem nächsten Besuch der Altenbergstrasse 4 nächste Woche) ist, ob es in 6 ein Kaffee Haus gibt, dass Albert & Frida heisst, oder ob damit das Bistro von Pêle-Mêle gemeint ist, dass in 4 residiert und der Eintrag in 6 auch auf osm falsch ist.
Somit werden diese Daten wenigstens auf osm bald aktuell sein. 
Bist du Admin hier in Bern? 
Ev. kann ich ja noch andere Daten prüfen, wenn ich mich nächste Woche an die Altenbergstrasse begebe.
habi (2025-09-18 20:25:39+00:00): > Bist du Admin hier in Bern?

Ich wohne in der Region und schaue an, was neue Accounts hier machen, deshalb landete ich bei deinem Changeset.
OpenStreetMap hat keine Admins per se, es ist ein Mitmach-Projekt, jede:r kann dazu beitragen.
svne (2025-10-04 01:12:07+00:00): This looks so much nicer. Glad someone got around to this, I haven't found the time.
kuhni74 (2025-10-27 21:28:49+00:00): vielen Dank - ist die note damit erledigt?
JeffSB (2025-09-20 00:46:35+00:00): This change seems to have broken Valhalla, and has added a significant number of nodes, in some cases hundreds of nodes within meters of each other along ways. E.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13148097576#map=19/45.646311/-74.360544
JeffSB (2025-09-20 00:46:47+00:00): https://github.com/valhalla/valhalla/issues/5521 for further discussion on the downstream breakage.
pat-lachute (2025-09-22 15:04:38+00:00): Thank you for letting me know! What is the minimum distance between points that is supported by OSM?
JeffSB (2025-09-22 16:07:19+00:00): I'm not sure there's a minimum per se, but I think it's somewhat unusual to have so many points around a corner like this. Might be best to ask in the OSM discord! https://discord.gg/openstreetmap

For what it's worth, this change revealed a very subtle bug in Valhalla and I was able to submit a patch to fix it :): https://github.com/valhalla/valhalla/pull/5529
pat-lachute (2025-09-22 19:18:57+00:00): Sorry, I see that I've made a mess. I didn't know that the data in OSM had to be less precise. I work for the city of Lachute, so my data layers are very detailed. I'll be more careful in the future and try to simplify the layers that I've already uploaded to OSM.
Rivaldo Corentino Chanceme DE SOUZA (2025-10-08 13:52:38+00:00): Hello sir, could you please correct your contribution?
We are stuck on September 16, even though we have much more recent contributions than that.
Rivaldo Corentino Chanceme DE SOUZA (2025-10-08 13:53:11+00:00): @pat-lachute
pat-lachute (2025-10-08 14:02:42+00:00): Hello, what do you mean?
Rivaldo Corentino Chanceme DE SOUZA (2025-10-08 14:30:21+00:00): Have you read this ticket?
Thank you for your prompt reply.

https://github.com/valhalla/valhalla/issues/5521
pat-lachute (2025-10-08 14:42:53+00:00): Yes, but JeffSB said this:
"For what it's worth, this change revealed a very subtle bug in Valhalla and I was able to submit a patch to fix it :):" 
So I thought it was fixed, but I had to be careful with my next exports so that the layers weren't too well defined. Now what would you like me to do?
JeffSB (2025-10-08 14:50:36+00:00): My fix is still in review and hasn't made it into upstream Valhalla yet, so the upstream maintainers of Valhalla are asking to revert this change for now. I'm a bit concerned this will hide the underlying bug in Valhalla but I was able to extract a pretty small extract of the OSM data to reproduce the bug which should allow us to test the fix independently of this change being rolled back.
pat-lachute (2025-10-08 14:56:38+00:00): On my side, is there anything I can do?
Nils Nolde (2025-10-12 14:53:43+00:00): @pat-lachute, Valhalla will be able to support this precision in a bit. Still, it'd be best if you edit those ways to be described by a handful of nodes. You can have a look at some roundabouts, they often only have the intersection nodes, so it looks more like a diamond than a circle. AFAIK there's no "minimum distance" guideline, but generally I wouldn't be more precise than 1-2 m in between nodes (at least when describing road geometry).
UtterClutter (2025-09-16 21:00:48+00:00): Do you have a particular vendetta against me Mr. Pigeon?
I consider this vandalism. I will give you this opportunity to explain yourself.
kaleidoscopica (2025-10-01 18:51:46+00:00): You might want to be careful to use the most recent imagery that's available - in this area, Esri World Imagery is more up-to-date than Bing Maps Aerial, so a lot of your natural area has already been replaced by more recent construction. (Also, if you didn't see my last comment about not gluing areas to roads, please read it! Responses to changeset comments help us know we're on the same page...)
Rudy Yanez (2025-10-01 19:03:19+00:00): Yes I read it.
Rudy Yanez (2025-10-01 19:06:01+00:00): Your previous comment was made after this change set occurred.
kaleidoscopica (2025-10-01 21:28:09+00:00): Thank you! I have been ungluing a lot of the glued areas today. If you try and do the same you might see why it's such a pain, which is why I reached out... sometimes people don't read/respond to notes and it just keeps making problems bigger... :)
SomeoneElse (2025-09-17 17:37:12+00:00): Hello,
You don't need to add "this small rock as an "outer" of the Spain boundary because it is well within Spanish territorial waters - see the big line here: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1311341#map=11/36.6318/-3.4734
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2025-09-17 17:37:36+00:00): Hola,
No es necesario añadir "esta pequeña roca" como "exterior" de la frontera con España, ya que se encuentra dentro de las aguas territoriales españolas. Vea la línea grande aquí:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1311341#map=11/36.6318/-3.4734
Atentamente,
Andy
NeisBot (2025-09-16 20:28:35+00:00): Hi wiley9012, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 93% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 2 highway(s)
- 2 building(s)
- 1 natural(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=172033927
rhhs (2025-09-17 06:34:11+00:00): There are "fixme=verify position" tags on some of these. Can these be removed?
Fraxi (2025-09-17 07:48:37+00:00): Върнах цялата промяна направо...
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172049444
Fraxi (2025-09-17 07:56:56+00:00): Но въпреки това се налага изместване и на тротоара(комбинираният), ако щеш, на места. Дори и не толкова на юг, колкото го бях направил. А ако визираш не бордюрите(което вече е анулирано), а хидрантите, за тях още има нужда от fixme, тъй като няма актуални улични снимки.