piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Katastra (2025-05-30 01:25:18+00:00): Sorry for the confusion! I just felt like I went a little overboard after looking at other marked creeks with the stream tag. It seemed like most of the time only the creeks with water in them all year were marked, and a lot of what I removed in this batch dries up in the summer, though obviously the creek bed is still there, so it was probably fine.
NeisReview (2025-05-30 06:21:34+00:00): 👍 Thank you for your private message and confirming that your deletions were intentional.

#HappyMapping
Allison P (2025-05-31 02:36:34+00:00): They're all streams and you can still map them. You can add the tag intermittent=yes.
fortera_au (2025-05-29 03:21:14+00:00): Hi there,

Has the actual road been changed physically in any way? If not, I think these should still be service toads, potentially marked as service=alley too. highway=service doesn't indicate a privately owned road.

access=private should also be remove from Little Winwood Street and Queen Street if they're now public roads too.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166898383
City of West Torrens (2025-05-29 04:10:56+00:00): Major enhancements done end of 2024 through till now. Can still remain alley way.

Little Queen Street also isn't a thing, its just an extension of Queen Street.
fortera_au (2025-05-29 04:20:19+00:00): If it's the same as other streets around it (i.e. Winwood) then residential is perfectly fine.

The access=private tags you'll definitely want to remove if they're public streets now though.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-05-30 01:08:32+00:00): If the stream does actually exist (& by imagery it does), then yes, it should be mapped in OSM!
Frans S (2025-05-29 10:00:40+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
A remark. Don't add generic names to objects, buildings, residential areas and water bodies except when you have local knowledge.
Just building=yes is sufficient.
You ignored the warnings on the issue triangle about that. !
Be more accurate in mapping and adjust bad placed mappings mapped by previous mappers.
This is a building only project !
Best regards
Frans S (2025-05-29 10:03:26+00:00): Hello.
Removed generic names from objects.
See my comment on another changeset.
CurlingMan13 (2025-05-30 04:57:40+00:00): Welcome to OSM!  Please review:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166899386
diamondarmorsteve (2025-05-30 21:55:21+00:00): Hi, thank you for your edits and your interest in OpenStreetMap! Some changes to the road classification (the highway tag) do not conform to US road classification standards. Specifically, small, dead-end roads, such as Curry Br Road, should be residential/unclassified, not tertiary or above.
silversurfer83 (2025-05-29 17:00:32+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap, Rob

thank you for taking the time to update our database.

I'd like to help you a bit to make the database even better:

Please add a node inside the building where a Point Of Interest (POI) is located and add the name and possibly the type of POI to that node so we can keep the info on the shop or restaurant or... separate from the info on the building itself.

If you have any questions about anything OSM please don't hesitate to ask. We can be found on Signal, Slack, c.osm.org,...

cheers
silversurfer83 (2025-05-29 17:00:33+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap, Rob

thank you for taking the time to update our database.

I'd like to help you a bit to make the database even better:

Please add a node inside the building where a Point Of Interest (POI) is located and add the name and possibly the type of POI to that node so we can keep the info on the shop or restaurant or... separate from the info on the building itself.

If you have any questions about anything OSM please don't hesitate to ask. We can be found on Signal, Slack, c.osm.org,...

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166900118
silversurfer83 (2025-05-29 17:00:34+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap, Rob

thank you for taking the time to update our database.

I'd like to help you a bit to make the database even better:

Please add a node inside the building where a Point Of Interest (POI) is located and add the name and possibly the type of POI to that node so we can keep the info on the shop or restaurant or... separate from the info on the building itself.

If you have any questions about anything OSM please don't hesitate to ask. We can be found on Signal, Slack, c.osm.org,...

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166900118
omel_s (2025-06-02 18:48:06+00:00): На Весёло-Вознесенке все полосы односторонним движением и идут с запада на восток, зачем ввели ложную информацию? когда вы там были последний раз?
evgenykatyshev (2025-05-30 06:12:30+00:00): Вы зря сдвинули дома. В редакторе можно выбирать какой спутниковый снимок использовать в качестве подложки. По умолчанию выбран Bing Maps Aerial, но на нём в Грузии очень сильно искажены координаты. Настоятельно рекомендую использовать вместо него снимки Esri World Imagery, они намного точнее.

Если включите эти снимки, то увидете, что дома теперь не совпадают с ним.
evgenykatyshev (2025-05-30 06:18:50+00:00): Отменил вашу правку. Вы ещё удаляли проезд около дома 46. Если его действительно нет (на спутниковом снимке есть), удалите, пожалуйста, его снова

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166953801
evgenykatyshev (2025-05-30 06:20:11+00:00): Вы подвинули дорогу по неточному снимку, отменил

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166953870
NeisReview (2025-05-29 11:47:34+00:00): #DeletionsCheck

Hi, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed many of your changes in this set involve deletions.

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.
felipeeugenio (2025-05-29 12:55:32+00:00): Hola. Esto es simplemente borrar cosas que existen. Los cambios serán reversados. Es de esperar que se trate de un error y no vandalismo.

saludos
NeisReview (2025-05-29 13:01:51+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166920782

Thanks, felipeeugenio
AgusQui (2025-06-02 03:27:48+00:00): Por favor deja de alinear calles basándote únicamente en Esri, las imágenes deben ser alineadas previamente con trazas gpx o de Strava, además debes tener en cuanta los demás elementos mapeados alrededor como edificios etc.
SimonPoole (2025-05-29 06:59:52+00:00): Please do not remove the buildings in Blatten without discussing this first with the Swiss community. 

See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/blatten-vs-gletscher-abbruch/130682/3
Lejun (2025-05-29 19:58:30+00:00): Yeah sure. Didn't occured to me one would need to keep data as is (and still confused about it as the whole discussion is in german and not english or swiss/french). Just wanted to help out.
TrickyFoxy (2025-05-29 12:46:12+00:00): Не используйте википамию для правок в OpenStreetMap, лицензия не позволяет это делать
Norbert Dichter (2025-05-29 10:00:02+00:00): Hello, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. Thank you for your contribution. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. Or just hit the Q-key.
Also please keep in mind: many buildings are very close but do not actually touch each other, try to map them close to each other without letting them connect or share nodes with each other, roads, or residential area outlines. In the iD web editor, holding down the "alt" key will keep nodes from "snapping" to each other and accidentally connecting.  Thanks so much for your contribution, Norbert 'Nodi' Dichter, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166902012
HellMap (2025-06-11 10:39:23+00:00): Sveiki,

Vai varētu lūdzu precizēt, kas tieši šeit ir mainījies. Vai šie ceļi ir atkal atvērti? Šeit ir diezgan daudz citu lietu kartētu un pašlaik sanāk uz pusi ceļi eksistē, uz pusi nē ar neskaidrām vērtībām un nepabeigtiem savienojumiem.
JekabsBalodis (2025-06-11 11:56:38+00:00): Dzelzceļa tilta balsta būvniecības laikā bija slēgta gājēju un velosipēdistu satiksmes gar Daugavu. Būvniecības darbi šobrīd ir pabeigti un gājējiem un velosipēdistiem ietve un velosipēdu celiņš ir atkal pieejams.
NeisBot (2025-05-29 05:51:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-05-30 07:05:31+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/166955389
osmviborg (2025-05-29 06:43:02+00:00): Fra wiki'en: Mapping parking spaces is an addition, not a replacement, to mapping a whole parking lot with amenity=parking
STV87 (2025-05-29 06:58:11+00:00): Tak osmviborg, jeg får det lige rettet. Påbegyndte en fortsættelse af hvad jeg kan se andre har gjort. Altså kodning af hver enkelt parkeringsbås, hvilket i virkeligheden virker tosset og unødvendigt.
Jeg retter det.
osmviborg (2025-05-29 07:13:23+00:00): Også benævnt som 'micro-mapping'
NeisBot (2025-05-29 06:45:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-05-30 07:05:05+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/166955376
Allison P (2025-05-31 02:37:44+00:00): This is a private residence. You cannot visit an amenity here. It is just the owner's mailing address. It should be removed in full.
eggie (2025-05-29 07:06:53+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
NeisBot (2025-05-29 07:09:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-05-30 07:04:41+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/166955358
stragu (2025-05-29 23:59:02+00:00): For reference:

https://www.brisbane.qld.gov.au/transport-and-parking/transport-projects/story-bridge-restoration-project

https://www.removepaywall.com/search?url=https://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/national/queensland/here-s-what-walking-the-council-s-story-bridge-footpath-detour-is-really-like-20250506-p5lwwy.html

https://www.removepaywall.com/search?url=https://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/national/queensland/budget-bjelke-petersen-organiser-lashes-lord-mayor-as-court-blocks-story-bridge-protest-20250529-p5m34h.html
The Polish (2025-07-17 13:28:29+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12872639498/

Czy w tym miejscu fizycznie znajduje się słupek kilometrażowy?
C2oc4 (2025-07-22 06:53:04+00:00): Witam. Na terenie powiatu będzińskiego nie ma słupków z pikietażem. Mapa z kilometrem została dostarczona do mnie i wprowadziłem to by ułatwić pracę służb (Policja PSP).
The Polish (2025-07-22 07:16:21+00:00): W OSM mapujemy wyłącznie obiekty fizyczne, które można bezpośrednio zweryfikować w terenie. Ponieważ słupków z pikietażem na terenie powiatu będzińskiego faktycznie nie ma, usunąłem je – zgodnie z zasadami OSM dotyczącymi odwzorowywania jedynie widocznych i sprawdzalnych elementów. Rozumiem, że dane kilometrowe miały pomóc służbom takim jak Policja czy PSP, jednak jeśli nie są one oznaczone fizycznie w terenie, to nie będą one dla tych służb użyteczne w praktyce.
C2oc4 (2025-07-22 12:45:26+00:00): oki
stillhart (2025-05-29 07:42:43+00:00): hi, I think you are wrong on this one. 
There's already one market and it's actually more on the west/south

see
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1390475404#map=16/46.41513/7.81082&layers=N
Alex-7 (2025-05-29 07:47:17+00:00): https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mapping-massive-catastrophic-landslide-blatten-lotschental-may-28-2025/130704 I had a careful look at this image and compared it with the satellite imagery. Besides there is now a lake above the landslide.
Alex-7 (2025-05-29 07:52:19+00:00): I wanted to make the landslide and the forming lake visible so that people and cars were not trying to go to the valley, creating by this additional worries for workers and engineers.
stillhart (2025-05-29 07:53:47+00:00): Check this picture, it shows it near perfect
https://x.com/subfossilguy/status/1927765782282264843

it's that bridge
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/634000644#map=19/46.420527/7.821091&layers=N

so the land slide is slightly below it and the lake above it.
stillhart (2025-05-29 07:54:14+00:00): (btw nothing wrong with the lake, it's all about accuracy for me :-)  )
stillhart (2025-05-29 07:55:27+00:00): This video is also a pretty good source
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ubf6QnNsUmA
Alex-7 (2025-05-29 08:00:13+00:00): I absolutely agree with you about accuracy. Bedsides I was in this valley only once. I can delete my these edits. Or perhaps you could correct it? I suggest though that the landslide and the forming lake still are visible to map users.
NeisBot (2025-05-29 07:39:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-05-29 15:43:11+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/166921087
Greg_Rose (2025-05-29 08:01:56+00:00): main source = Grand Co cadastral database : roads and parcel layers
InsertUser (2025-05-29 21:26:04+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap. 

Is there really a village called "Ruins" or should those buildings be `building=ruins`?

Similarly is "Royal Island Estate" possibly a `leisure=resort` rather than a town?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dresort
Fizzie-DWG (2025-06-14 04:42:07+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167598681
DwarfNebula_ (2025-05-29 12:16:45+00:00): Hey, I love the proposal, but isn't it a bit quick to already change it on the map?
silversurfer83 (2025-05-29 15:47:28+00:00): I second that.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166906576
Mxdanger (2025-05-29 21:50:45+00:00): Thanks for your concern DwarfNebula_ but I’m the one who spearheaded the “new” amenity=towing_service to begin with. Just a few weeks ago world wide usage of it was 1. I got it up to about 60 by hand. Now that the consensus is to drop “_service” I’ll just do that because every instance of it was something I previously modified and verified.
DwarfNebula_ (2025-05-30 20:29:14+00:00): Ah okay, I haven't looked in it that deep. Thanks for clearing it up.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-06-14 04:42:49+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167598692
SafwatHalaby (2025-05-29 19:46:42+00:00): שלום, הבניינים שהוספתם חופפים את הכביש. נשמע שסימנתם לפי הגג של הבניין ולא לפי הבסיס שלו. בנוסף, שימו לב שלפעמים התמונות האוויריות לא מיושרות באופן מלא. מומלץ גם לקרוא את ההנחיות של ישראל כאן: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/HE:Israel

Hello, the buildings you added intersect with the street. It seems you marked according to the rooftop and not the base of the building.

Please also note aerial footage sometimes have some offset. It's also recommended that you read the Israel guidelines here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Israel#The_basics
SafwatHalaby (2025-06-03 08:32:28+00:00): Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167123203
hNdrX_ (2025-05-30 20:47:47+00:00): Hej kolibris,
mit der Brücke sieht das gut aus. Du hast die Bing Bilder benutzt, da gab's den Weg noch nicht. Bei den "Esri-Weltbildern"-Daten ist der Weg schon sichtbar. Da könntest du nochmal etwas nachkorrigieren.
Und: Fußweg (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway=footway) oder Pfad (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway=path) - was passt eher von den Definitionen her?
evgenykatyshev (2025-05-30 06:07:45+00:00): Hello, are you sure that this is a correct house number? The building is lcoated between houses number 5 and number 7. House number 11 is already exist 2 buildings to the West. Cadastre map marks this building as a part of house number 5.
LogicDaemon (2025-05-31 05:08:47+00:00): I have my doubts now. The nearby 5 is definitely correct, but the one I selected is shown as nr. 11 on other maps.
And there are very few address tablets.

If the cadastre map shows it's nr. 5 then I guess you're correct.

I haven't found a way to undo my change, but if you know how, please do. Meanwhile I'll try to find the address table if it's there, and post it if it's number 11 indeed (or do nothing if it's 5).
evgenykatyshev (2025-05-31 05:48:48+00:00): Ok, I've changed it back
NVBW_Edit_Nakaner (2025-09-22 14:58:02+00:00): Hallo,

du hast bei Bahnsteig Gleis 4/5 erfasst, dass der Hublift ein maximales Gewicht von 350 kg habe. Am 12.02.2023 hat ein Erfasser vor Ort im Auftrag der NVBW jedoch 250 kg erhoben. Mehr als folgendes Foto liegt mir dazu nicht vor: https://nextcloud.geofabrik.de/s/TyBGn8myssok6JH

Hast du zufällig selber Fotos/Aufzeichnungen dazu, um den Widerspruch zu klären? Sonst lege ich eine Note an.

Viele Grüße

Michael
NVBW_Edit_Nakaner (2025-09-22 15:00:08+00:00): Dasselbe Problem gibt es bei Gleis 7/8. Das Foto dort: https://nextcloud.geofabrik.de/s/ipTC6yDzYiGewje

Übrigens, Gewichte gibt man in OSM in Tonnen an. Als Dezimaltrenner verwenden wir einen Punkt.
silversurfer83 (2025-05-29 15:48:52+00:00): Danke
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166907571
Marvk (2025-06-12 09:28:07+00:00): Hi Tim, leider hast du mit der Änderung das Routing für Fahrräder kaputt gemacht, hier fehlte noch ein oneway:bicycle=no 😅 Ich hab das mal ergänzt.
stillhart (2025-05-29 08:26:56+00:00): I would just delete your landslide, it's more wrong than the already mapped one. Better extend the existing one with more accuracy
Alex-7 (2025-05-29 08:29:43+00:00): OK. I will do it now.
stillhart (2025-05-29 08:34:45+00:00): 👌
NeisBot (2025-05-29 08:36:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-05-30 07:04:09+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/166955334
flohoff (2025-06-26 12:37:38+00:00): Moin,
ich reverte deine position:forward zu position:distance wieder.

distance ist hier nicht eindeutig. Distance wäre die diagonale - das ist hier aber nicht angeschlagen. 

Und ja - Im wiki steht distance. Das ist aber eben unsinn.

Flo
mueschel (2025-06-26 13:32:13+00:00): Bitte lass die Tags so wie im Wiki beschrieben. 
Bitte erst dort diskutieren und einen Konsens finden.
eggie (2025-05-30 17:12:36+00:00): I merged your info with the present addressnode
Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2025-05-29 11:18:52+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  I merged your info with the present addressnodes. 
greetz,
eggie
Tomas Straupis (2025-05-30 11:31:53+00:00): Laba diena. O gal daugiau info galima? Pvz. koks pavadinimas šitos kaimo sodybos? Gal net svetainė yra? Ar šiaip kažkokie kontaktai, nes dabar internete nieko neina rasti.
Rimantass (2025-05-31 23:13:49+00:00): Sveiki, tai paprastas gyvenamasis namas, tiesiog nežinojau, kaip taisyklingai pažymėti
Rimantass (2025-05-31 23:19:18+00:00): Taip pat galėčiau daugiau prisidėti prie žemėlapio adresų atnaujinimo ar kitų trūkumų.
Tomas Straupis (2025-06-02 09:11:05+00:00): Supratau, ačiū už info. Tai tada nuėmiau turizmo žymą, kol kas lieka tik adresas, nes pastatą nubraižyti galėsime tik kai kurioje nors ortofoto pastatai pasimatys.
Tai džiugu, kad yra nors prisidėti prie OSM pildymo. Adresus tikimės kelių mėnesių bėgyje vėl paleisti sinrchronizaciją su RC duomenimis, bet visada galima ir rankomis, jei yra noro ir laiko. Kokios informacijos reikėtų?
Dave Venables (2025-05-29 10:15:03+00:00): Royal Telegraph. The Royal Standard still sells Cask Conditioned Real Ale
gurglypipe (2025-05-29 10:03:26+00:00): For anyone looking at this in future, please see the discussion on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166869616
rempshaener (2025-05-29 16:16:28+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.

Du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Ich schließe aus dem Zusammenhang, dass es sich um einen Löschwasserbrunnen für den Saugbetrieb handelt mit festem A-Sauganschluss handelt. Falls nicht: bitte melden.
Dann wären folgende Angaben noch sinnvoll:
fire_hydrant:type=pipe
fire_hydrant:pressure=suction
couplings:diameters=A

Die Angabe von ref=Saugstelle sollte entfernt werden; die Information, dass es sich um selbige handelt, ergibt sich aus dem übrigen Tagging.

Eine Anmerkung noch zur Lage: Hydranten sollten nicht mit Wegen und Flächen verbunden werden. Das lässt sich schnell beheben: im Editor „E“ drücken und das Objekt löst sich von der Linie.

Vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag und weiterhin viel Spaß beim Mappen.
Viele Grüße

P.S.: Vielleicht könnest du mal schauen, ob www.openstreetmap.org/node/7623843237 eine (falsche – wegen „suction_point“) Dublette ist und bei Bedarf löschen.
streckenkundler (2025-06-01 16:58:34+00:00): Hallo Tim,

auch von mir ein Herzliches Willkommen,
Für Hydranten und Co. habe ich auch noch ein paar Links:

1. https://waldbrand-app.de/mapcomplete/waldbrand.html?z=14&lat=51.62704&lon=13.56322&tab=3

2. https://www.osmhydrant.org/de/#zoom=13&lat=51.9373&lon=13.9171

3. http://www.openfiremap.de/?zoom=14&lat=51.62933&lon=13.55877&layers=B00000T

4. https://emergency.wambachers-osm.website/?map=14/51.626889/13.567085&base=OSM&data=FST,HYD

Gerade bei ersteren beiden müsstest du direkt über die Webseite editieren können. Bei ersterer steckt u.a. unsere brandenburgische Landesforst mit dahinter und da gibt es auch mindestens für Android eine eigene App...

Bei Fragen, kannst du mich gerne anfunken...

Grüße aus dem Spreewald,