piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
pinecakes (2023-01-23 21:45:45+00:00): Apologizes for my mistake! Thank you for fixing it and letting me know
iandees (2023-01-23 21:49:27+00:00): No problem! It's easy to overlook because the text for the store name isn't shown a lot of times when it's on the polygon.
silversurfer83 (2023-01-21 22:13:31+00:00): JOSM hat beim Upload keine Texteingabe mehr erlaubt. Daher hier mein Änderungskommentar:
Korbach: Landuses, Gebäudegeometrien, neue Gebäude, Adressen, Flurnamen nach Wissen, Luftbild und Kataster
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-02-01 00:50:56+00:00): reverted deletion of road: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/930823012
silversurfer83 (2023-01-21 22:51:20+00:00): Hi there
thanks for contributing to OSM.

One question:
What was that landuse=residential in Germany doing in this changeset?
I decided, that it was bogus, so I deleted it, ok? See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131555912

Greetings
silversurfer83
Benoît C MdP (2023-01-23 17:12:36+00:00): Bonjour Britzz,

Je n'ai pas compris pourquoi tu as renommé ce tronçon de voie https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/816697678 car d'après wikipedia c'est bien la rue Charles Leroy https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rue_Charles-Leroy

Bonne continuation

Benoît
Britzz (2023-01-24 23:25:32+00:00): Inattention de ma part (j'ai fusionné un tronçon Ouest qui était abusivement raccroché à la Rue Voltaire) en rajoutant la bande cyclable. Merci pour l'alerte et la correction (j'ai repris la relation qui avait aussi souffert)
mga_geo (2023-01-22 07:55:05+00:00): Bonjour,
Sur les lignes de bus, on a un route aller et une route retour, il ne faut donc pas ajouter les bretelles d'accès aux ronds-points.
Bonne journée
Marc
t0n3t (2023-01-22 21:25:35+00:00): Bonjour et merci pour le commentaire. L'erreur est donc avoir rajouté la ligne sur la bretelle ou bien d'avoir créé la bretelle en lui-même ?
felipeeugenio (2023-01-23 00:46:48+00:00): gracias por la edición. Por favor acordarse despues de abrirlas.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131555998
Glassman (2023-01-22 21:04:03+00:00): Not all of the areas you show in the landuse appear to be part of the apt complex. See https://matterhornwab.co.pierce.wa.us/publicgis/?find=0420241066. Also - it looks like there are multiple house numbers. Can you review your edit?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131556557
michiganguy123 (2023-01-22 03:49:16+00:00): please revert this change, US-31 is the primary route, this is OLD us 31 and should be secondary.
michiganguy123 (2023-01-22 03:50:29+00:00): Also the business route through Hart should be primary according to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States/Road_classification since it is a US business route
emersonveenstra (2023-01-22 23:09:27+00:00): No, it's right. That wiki article very clearly says "This page no longer represents a national consensus based on recent discussions on talk-us and the OSMUS Slack. When editing highway classifications in the United States, please consult state-specific documentation." and Michigan has decided to follow the 2021 Highway Classification Guidelines, available here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States/2021_Highway_Classification_Guidance. The new guidelines prioritize network importance and routing over labels and designations. So, the Old 31 route is a primary highway because it connects several small towns, and I made the business route through Hart a secondary because it's not as important as Old 31, but it is still going through the center of town.

If you're a local and disagree with me downgrading the business route to secondary, I'm fine with you changing it since I don't have local knowledge. But it needs to be a primary based on its importance to the road network, not just because it's a business route.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:08:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:04:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:03:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:09:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:06:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:10:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:07:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:09:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:10:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:07:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:06:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:10:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:08:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:07:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:03:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:07:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:10:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:05:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-02-01 00:44:21+00:00): no me parece bien las rutas que quitaste aquí: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131557918/
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:03:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:06:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:07:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:04:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:03:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:04:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:04:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:09:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:03:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:07:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
emersonveenstra (2023-01-23 00:06:54+00:00): Hi,

You removed the highway tag from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/8680370, can you please fix that? Thanks!
emersonveenstra (2023-01-23 00:07:05+00:00): and also https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/8693787
aighes (2023-01-23 23:22:46+00:00): Hi, both ways are back. I removed accidentally the highway-tag.
RaphaelPasloin (2023-01-22 04:18:18+00:00): Hello,

The path exist on imagery , it's not because you think it s lead to nowhere that the way must be deleted. 

Best regards.
pitscheplatsch (2023-01-25 07:02:27+00:00): Hi Caimur, welcome to OSM.

Please, don't use the name-tag for address information. More details about the name tag can be found in our OSM wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name

Thanks.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
Fizzie-DWG (2025-03-14 06:12:45+00:00): Reverted by DWG - use of unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163597022
user_5359 (2023-01-23 17:41:02+00:00): Hello! if the brand:wikidata key is present it is not necessary to copy all the translations you get from wikidata to OSM as well. Please limit yourself to the local notation.
aweech (2023-01-24 23:07:49+00:00): Hi,
I reviewed this edit, as you requested. Just letting you know that it looks totally fine. Thank you for your contributions!
End0fLine (2023-01-22 03:47:57+00:00): These look great! If you happen to know what type of buildings you are adding, it is better to be more specific such as a house, barn, shed...

On the other side, a building is better than nothing at all! Thank you for contribbuting to OSM!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131559223
End0fLine (2023-01-22 03:44:21+00:00): Hola! I think these look great, though I do have one suggestion. If you're a local, please ignore this because I'm only going off of satellite images, but it does appear that the fields touch each other in the aerial images. It is OK for them to share sides on the map! Please don't hesitate to reach out with any questions
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131559313
NorthCrab (2023-01-22 09:36:01+00:00): Witaj na OpenStreetMap!
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/337477372
Nie byłem w stanie potwierdzić tej zmiany, numer 36 ma już budynek obok. Jesteś w stanie przesłać jakieś zdjęcie albo informację na dowód takiego adresu? Pozdrawiam!
NorthCrab (2023-01-22 09:37:38+00:00): Jeśli budynek nie ma adresu to w aplikacji jest odpowiednia opcja do zaznaczenia.
9FFNOVEJ3U (2023-01-22 04:04:09+00:00): Sure! I'll fix it.
zstadler (2023-12-02 07:46:53+00:00): שלום גדעון,

תודה על תרומתך למיפוי ב
OSM!

בעריכה זו שינית את התיוג של כמה דרכים מ 
highway=proposed
ל
highway=planned.

למשל
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/697998749/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/698001404

במצב זה, מתייגים גם את סוג הדרך המתוכנן. למשל
planned=tertiary
בדומה לתיוג
proposed=tertiary
שהיה בגרסה הקודמת.

תודה,
זאב
zstadler (2023-12-02 07:50:58+00:00): Hello geogidon,

Thank you for your contribution to the map!

In this edit, you have changed the tagging of some roads from 
highway=proposed to highway=planned.

For example,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/697998749/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/698001404

This tagging is expected to also have the type of planned highway, such as
planned=tertiary
similar to the
proposed=tertiary
tagging in the previous version.

Thanks,
Zeev
dressed-pleasekin (2023-06-30 18:43:01+00:00): Приветствую!
Простите, что снова с дублями - обращаю внимание на раздвоение магазина «Рустем» на идентичные точку и здание.
У здания убрал название, теперь это просто building=retail, точку магазина внутри него не изменял.
dressed-pleasekin (2023-02-02 02:52:44+00:00): Здравствуйте!
У вас дублировались объекты - магазины были представлены как точками, так и типом зданий. Пожалуйста, придерживайтесь принципа «Один объект - один элемент OSM» - в подобном случае это легко исправить, если задавать зданиям тип retail и ставить точки магазинов внутри зданий.
Так с данными карты гораздо проще работать - как через мобильные редакторы, так и вообще в долгосрочной перспективе.
Спасибо!
❤️‍🔥_import (2023-01-22 05:09:36+00:00): correction: this changeset comment should read "Add wikidata & ref:linz:place_id tags to 𝗵𝗶𝗹𝗹𝘀"
Koenindo (2023-01-22 07:19:50+00:00): Sorry, noticed the error and corrected in changeset 131561442
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131560278
CoyKoi (2023-01-23 10:47:39+00:00): Hasn't this apartment completed construction?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131561090
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-16 02:06:38+00:00): Changeset reverted due to vandalism.  User was referred to the DWG.
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-16 02:03:33+00:00): reverted changeset due to vandalism
mueschel (2023-01-26 11:33:25+00:00): Hi,
you added many tags to these objects that are not common and should not be in OSM. 

In OSM we have to use a well-defined set of tags to allow all the software tools to understand the data and e.g. show it on maps.
Please use only keys that are documented in the Wiki or are available as presets in your editor.
Thanks!
visusest (2023-02-09 07:04:05+00:00): Thanks for adding this. I know a few cyclists that use it often.
BPTT (2023-02-09 21:17:41+00:00): Me too! Shame it's not official...
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-16 02:04:36+00:00): reverted changeset due to vandalism.  Cartpaths do not exist.
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-16 02:01:26+00:00): Please use better changeset comments.  What did you change, and why?
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-16 02:02:38+00:00): This changeset is being reverted as this cartpath does NOT exist here and changes were clearly done for some game.

If you disagree, please elaborate on why this cartpath was added.
osmviborg (2023-01-22 08:46:50+00:00): 'landuse=farmyard' 
"An area of land with farm buildings like farmhouse, dwellings, farmsteads, sheds, stables, barns, equipment sheds, feed bunkers, etc. plus the open space in between them and the shrubbery/trees around them".
osmviborg (2023-01-22 08:55:12+00:00): Hvis du erstatter dine 'landuse=farmyard' med 'area:highway=driveway' så passer pengene. 'landuse=farmyard' er hele området.
MicDK (2023-01-23 13:26:16+00:00): Jeg vil kigge på det. Tror det kunne gøre det muligt at lægge surfaces ind, som vil blive vist i 3D. Jeg kan godt se, at "farmyard" bliver overflødiggjort, når jeg mikromapper og udfylder området med f.eks. "driveways".
osmviborg (2023-01-23 14:04:43+00:00): Du skal ikke tagge for F4, du skal følge wikien, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
MicDK (2023-01-23 15:00:42+00:00): De surfaces jeg lægger ind er reelle og eksisterende. Jeg holder mig dermed til praksis. 

Forskellen mellem landkort og 3D er, at sidstnævnte "renderer" surfaces. På samme måde som forskellige landkort også "renderer" forskelligt.
MicDK (2023-01-23 15:04:58+00:00): Fra Wiki: "The surface key is used to provide additional information about the physical surface of roads/footpaths and some other features, particularly regarding material composition and/or structure."

"May be used on nodes, ways and areas".
osmviborg (2023-01-23 15:24:44+00:00): Læs min første kommentar.
literan (2023-01-22 17:29:56+00:00): тут получилось, что дом тоже покрыт травой (или стоит на газоне): 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15347275
adiatmad (2023-01-23 02:58:13+00:00): Good work on your edits! However, it would be preferable to avoid adding a generic name, such as name=Steps (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1134224342). You might want to take a look at this page (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions). Happy mapping!
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-01-22 14:17:37+00:00): When parking spaces don't fit into the parking lot like near Reval sport, don't be afraid to make the parking lot bigger.
aceman444 (2023-03-01 21:38:52+00:00): Ok, dakujeme za uvedenie zdroja.
Ale 'alt_name_1' je nespravna znacka. Skuste nejaku inu, alebo dajte oba nazvy ako alt_name=PR1BINA;Pribina .
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-01-22 14:13:16+00:00): Hi, thanks for contributing,
the parking spots in the middle don't line up with the road marking. On the right they are on top of waste container and what appears to be not a parking area.
Rashid86 (2023-01-22 13:38:57+00:00): What is it? Does it look like vandalism?
mapko (2023-09-10 07:25:28+00:00): Zdravim. Toto mate odkial? Nic take nie je definovane, maximalne by to mohla byt 4. ci 5. alternativa. Prosim vratte to do povodneho stavu.
Fjana (2023-09-10 08:36:42+00:00): Zdravím! Vycházel jsem ze článků na Wikipedii, které tuto oblast všechny shodně označovaly za peáž. V té době, kdy jsem tyto úpravy prováděl, jsem ještě neznal oficiální server pro slovenskou správu dálnic, který uvádí informace jinak.
Tuto chybu jsem už opravil:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141052173
mapko (2023-09-10 10:09:13+00:00): Dakujem, no chcelo by to opravit kompletne. Tu este zostali cesty zahnute do relacie k R3 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12106488#map=17/48.58853/18.89539
Fjana (2023-09-10 13:29:52+00:00): Dobrý den:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141063106
Ještě jednou se omlouvám, tyto úpravy byly dělány z dobré vůle a s dobrým úmyslem
mapko (2023-09-10 14:32:41+00:00): Dakujeme
bkil (2023-10-19 20:23:03+00:00): Köszönjük a közreműködést, de a söröző már szerepelt a térképen, így töröltem a duplikációt.
Kalika Prasad sadhu saran Pandey I c (2023-08-01 11:13:44+00:00): Hariharpur sant kabir nagar Uttar Pradesh
Harfeur (2023-01-22 13:30:56+00:00): Bonjour Thomas !
Il n'est pas utile de rajouter la ville puisqu'elle est déjà présente ici : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/671187035

De plus, lors de l'ajout d'une ville, il est nécessaire de la relier à une relation. Pour en savoir plus, consultez https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:place

Ici, la relation est déjà présente : https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/149480

Enfin, il est nécessaire de sourcer avec des données officielles, telles que l'INSEE.

J'ai donc annulé vos modifications (voir ici : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131566859)
Harfeur (2023-01-22 13:32:12+00:00): Si vous souhaitez déplacer le point correspondant à la ville, déplacez le noeud existant : https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=id&node=671187035#map=19/45.82352/4.95285
sorcrosc (2023-01-28 23:34:18+00:00): Ciao Matteo Fid, c'è un motivo per aver scollegato la via di accesso con il cancello alla strada principale?
Così manca il collegamento e le restrizioni di svolta mappate sono rimaste danneggiate.
Fammi sapere, grazie.
eggie (2023-01-22 17:57:11+00:00): Dag Mark

Je fietspad liep door het water warnings:crossing_ways:highway-highway 	1

Ik heb het er nu uitgehaald. 
MVG
eggie
A Hall (2023-01-23 19:23:23+00:00): Is there any chance we can revert this changeset? It overwrote a lot of painstaking work I did in Morgan, Warner's Grant, and Warren's Gore. Subsequent edits should improve upon exist edits. This changeset  simplifies my edits, merges relationships, thus making this area more difficult to edit. Hours of my work have been undone, without clarification or justification...
ottwiz (2023-01-23 19:26:12+00:00): Yes you can revert the changeset, but then please finish the rest of the county, I'll move back to doing WV then.
ottwiz (2023-01-23 19:27:08+00:00): My method to map forests are to map over track roads since I don't see any sense of mapping those woodland parts separately. (But this is me)
A Hall (2023-01-23 19:33:14+00:00): Neither strategy is wrong, they're different. And when one has been applied, there should be good justification to overwrite it. Again, I've been doing extremely detailed work here and I don't think any of it was wrong. To take a well maintained service/track road framed on either side with forests, and draw trees all over it doesn't make a lot of sense to me. If you're quickly trying to cover land masses, your strategy is fine. But you went into areas that didn't need any attention, and simplified them...

And the other work you did is fine. But now that this is an enormous changeset it creates a nasty conflict of interest