piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Santi2222 (2025-10-27 23:36:31+00:00): Gracias por el cambio de las direcciones postales, he echado un ojo y en principio ya no deberían saltar errores. Respecto a los separadores... supongo que la solución óptima sería que el propio renderizador incluyera los espacios automáticamente (aunque dudo que esto pase).
Hugoren Martinako (2025-10-28 10:40:33+00:00): Bueno, aunque haya corregido muchos, veo que en Osmose que sigue habiendo muchísimos más errores. Mira, solo de direcciones para Álava 😄: https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/#loc=9/42.917/-2.7448&level=1%2C2%2C3&country=spain_euskadi_alava&item=2060

Estoy estos días estoy tratando de reducir la cantidad de errores que se ven en euskadi con el tema de los nombres que no casan como deben, por lo que verás más ediciones mías.
https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/issues/open?item=5060&country=spain_euskadi_%2a
Davileci (2025-12-28 12:55:40+00:00): ¿Cómo afecta este cambio a las etiquetas con "official_name" ya existentes? ¿Habría que agregar también espacios junto a la barra?
Hugoren Martinako (2025-12-28 20:38:31+00:00): Yo pondría el espacio por legibilidad, pero al no mostrarse ese campo directamente, da un poco igual, como prefieras
eggie (2025-10-24 15:01:03+00:00): Prima zo..
Je kunt bv ook losse bomen toevoegen op nodes. Even één boom toegevoegd als voorbeeld.
Wanneer je CTRL-F5 een paar keer toetst zie je eerder effect. je cache leegmaken.
JacobPrinsen (2025-10-24 15:11:46+00:00): Top! Zal is kijken de komende dagen of ik meer kleine dingen kan aanpassen. Heel veel dank voor de tips!
eggie (2025-10-24 15:06:13+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  Alle begin is moeilijk. Een paardenbak tag je met leisure=pitch sport=equestrian  evt surface=sand

name=Paddock hoort niet op de kaart.

MVG
eggie
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-10-24 15:10:13+00:00): Nog iets...  Alle gebouwen zijn directe ingemeten import vanuit de BAG. (Kadaster)
Je kunt dus geen gebouwen aanpassen op grond van een luchtfoto.
Waar je verspringen ziet komt door de schuingenomen luchtfoto.. of het is een danrand. Ik heb de gebouwen weer uitgelijnd met de BAG.
eggie (2025-10-24 15:16:35+00:00): Hier een voorbeeld van een paardenbak. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/51.772876/4.682523
Gregory Peony (2025-11-10 04:38:18+00:00): hello, you mapped a building's wall as a footprint here.
eggie (2025-10-24 15:21:42+00:00): Oke....   OSM zit vol addertjes. De onderdoorgang loopt niet onder de grond. Dus layer=-1 kan weg.
Een doorgang door een gebouw tag je met tunnel=building_passage 
gr eggie
JacobPrinsen (2025-10-24 15:31:05+00:00): Verder is het wel een gebruikersvriendelijke kaart haha
eggie (2025-10-24 15:19:19+00:00): Oke...  Ik kijk even als validator.
Dat geel staat leuk, maar dat heet taggen voor de renderer (kaartenmaker)

Het zal dus moeten worden 
leisure=pitch
sport=equestrian
surface=sand

Elke kaart laat dan weer andere kleurtjes zien. Op de standaardkaart wordt het dan toevallig groen.
eggie (2025-10-24 15:26:19+00:00): Ik heb het aangepast als voorbeeld.
pwbriggs (2026-05-28 05:11:36+00:00): Hey, what do you mean by male=unisex female=unisex? If it's a single-occupancy room for either gender, it should be just unisex=yes and no female=* or male=* tags.

On the other hand, if this is really two restrooms, one female and one male, then it would not be accurate to have unisex=* at all, and it should be female=yes + male=yes. But female=* and male=* are boolean tags; I don't know of a case where a value other than yes or no makes sense according to convention.

Let me know what your intent was here.
Canyon Runner (2026-05-28 10:57:27+00:00): Hey so I used street complete app to fill in the data here. I don't remember what prompts it provided me. But the bathroom here was unisex. Any gender could use any private stall.
pwbriggs (2026-05-28 16:00:23+00:00): I'll change it to unisex=yes then. Thanks!
fb552 (2025-10-30 14:19:42+00:00): Ciao BiboORM, 
non sono riuscito a vedere sul terreno tracce di questa ferrovia. Mi confermi che da qualche parte è possibile rilevarla?
dieterdreist (2025-10-31 09:12:51+00:00): Ciao Bibo, ti avevo scritto qualche tempo fa sull'inserimento di tram a Roma che sono spariti da decenni senza alcuna traccia, e li vedo ancora tutti qui. Generalmente non sono inseribili in OSM se non sono più osservabili (anche indirettamente) nella realtà. Andremmo a "cancellarli" presto (nel senso che saranno resi invisibili ma rimaranno comunque nello storico di OpenStreetMap, se vorresti trasferirli in OHM sarebbe sempre possibile).
fb552 (2026-01-27 16:14:53+00:00): Ciao Bibo, con changeset/177769773 i binari aggiunti sono stati rimossi da OSM.
Come discusso negli ultimi mesi questi binari non esistono più e non restano neppure le tracce della loro passata presenza.
Consiglio, se di interesse, un import su OHM.
rskedgell (2025-10-26 15:13:21+00:00): Thanks!
Comino (2025-10-24 16:56:49+00:00): Placing a POI on the driveway is not allowed. That's why I've adjusted things to comply with the rules on OSM.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-24 16:08:04+00:00): reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410  and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969  remain not answered

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173725370
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-24 16:06:08+00:00): reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410  and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969  remain not answered

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173725274
msevilla00 (2025-12-12 08:36:22+00:00): Hola perlus5
Veo que hace poco tiempo incluiste el LIC del bajo gállego pero no has indicado de dónde has sacado la información, o sea, cual es la fuente. Así mismo los nombres no deben incluir siglas, o sea debería ser "Lugar de Interés Comunitario Bajo Gállego". Además, si no me equivoco es también Zona de Especial Protección para las Aves, ZEPA. Este tema de la red natura 2000 la tenemos pendiente en España, en general, y en Aragón en particular, desde hace tiempo para realizar una importación en condiciones.
Ya me dirás.
Un saludo
msevilla00 (2025-12-12 08:47:09+00:00): Aquí la ficha del lugar en la red natura 2000: https://biodiversity.europa.eu/sites/natura2000/ES2430077
Habría que añadir la fuente, la etiqueta boundary y definitivamente quitar lo de LIC o ZEPA y dejar solo "Bajo Gállego".
msevilla00 (2026-02-28 17:02:55+00:00): Hola, regreso sobre este tema.
¿Podrías decirme algo al respecto?
Saludos
marc__marc (2026-01-25 11:59:17+00:00): Bonjour,
suggestion pour renseigner le fait que c'est une v3 v4 : model=v3;v4
j'ai mis à jour la page spécifique https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station/Tesla_Motors
felipeeugenio (2025-10-26 14:40:19+00:00): Hola Camilo. Veo que hace tiempo no revisas el telegram.

Al SII hay que tenerle paciencia a veces. Si bien te creo que aparece la palabra "presidente" por ahí, es un nombre alternativo quizas. porque los carteles en terreno están sin el "presidente".

Saludos
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-24 17:03:42+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13254461826
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/339540259

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
user_5359 (2025-10-24 16:54:36+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/162153490
more than 100 meters over streets and buildings. 
I moved the node back to the original position.
user_5359 (2025-10-24 16:59:31+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1444541487. What is the mean the tag handicap = 	yes on a highway? Please have also a look on https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:handicap
Benji Gillman (2025-10-25 10:37:52+00:00): Thanks for the feedback and the welcome! Yes, I see I've used an incorrect tag. I'll check the wiki more from now on 👍

I'll remove that tag now.
eggie (2025-10-24 16:59:50+00:00): Welkom bij OSM.
Bedankt voor je bijdrage. Je kunt het best amenity=drinking_water toevoegen.
Dan zie je ook iets op de kaart.
Mvg
eggie
eggie (2025-10-24 19:10:59+00:00): Naam en duplicated tagging verwijderd
rskedgell (2026-01-03 18:15:09+00:00): Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property
woodpeck (2026-01-03 19:57:26+00:00): I have reverted all of Sparko000's deletions. I encourage Sparko000 to use access=private tags or similar, as explained in the link above. (DWG Ticket#2026010310000131)
rskedgell (2026-01-03 20:17:41+00:00): Many thanks @woodpeck
Yunan973 (2025-10-24 20:48:37+00:00): Hi,
could you fix all the issues you have created ? (red nodes here : https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=11.55244&lat=3.85195&zoom=13&baselayer=OSM%20Carto%20(OSMF)&opacity=0.50&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways).
SomeoneElse (2025-12-23 19:25:39+00:00): Just wondered - this memorial: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13254558101 isn't the same as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/603833919 by any chance is it?
Best Regards,
Andy
vbertola (2025-12-23 20:01:35+00:00): Thanks for spotting this! It looks like the same object, but the position of 603833919 is definitely wrong. Maybe the statue was moved? (603833919 is 16 year old)
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-24 17:03:46+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13254566017

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
b-holdet (2025-11-10 09:14:44+00:00): Når du lægger sten ind, som denne her: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13254588203 så skal du være obs. på, at der er forskel mellem natural=rock og natural=stone

Rock er defineret som den del af undergrunden, der stikker op:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural=rock?uselang=da

Mens Stone er den løse del fra en klippe:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural=stone

Det er, så vidt jeg har kendskab til, kun i Kalkgrave, Kalk-klinter og på Bornholm, hvor man kan møde natural=rock i Danmark.

Vil du ikke mene at det skal være natural=stone du har set på stedet?
bxl-forever (2025-10-24 17:55:12+00:00): Nbr 85 was already correctly mapped, this is next door.

Please respect our work and do not add duplicate addresses.
dknelson9876 (2025-10-26 04:36:05+00:00): Am I looking at this correctly that you moved the highway=traffic_signals node from the stop line to where the ways cross? Why would you remove detail like that?
Halfdeaf007 (2025-10-26 17:40:00+00:00):  Can put traffic lights at intersections because there are only two roads. If it's more than 4 roads, then we can put stop lines.
Friendly_Ghost (2025-10-26 18:04:19+00:00): That's not how that works. Putting stop nodes at the stop lines is an improvement in all situations, regardless of how many ways cross at an intersection.
dknelson9876 (2025-10-26 19:45:56+00:00): I didn't say that you can't, I said that it's less detail to have it where the nodes intersect. Do you have a good reason for why less detail would be preferable?
Molandfreak (2025-10-26 05:35:24+00:00): Great job, looks like we’re almost done with all the townships East River!
bxl-forever (2025-10-24 17:44:40+00:00): place=isolated_dwelling.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:place%3Disolated_dwelling

Ici, en pleine ville ??
Vos ajouts dans OpenStreetMap ne sont pas sérieux, nous n’arrêtons pas de devoir corriger vos erreurs.
rivermont (2026-01-12 02:39:51+00:00): Please pay attention to the existing tags when 'fixing' stuff. This way was tagged 'destroyed:railway' and 'damage:event=2024HurricaneHelene' for a good reason. It does not currently exist. I have corrected the tagging
Isopycnic (2026-01-12 17:18:34+00:00): As far as I’m aware most of the rail bed was relaid and service was restored between Erwin and the quartz mines west of Spruce Pine within the past few months.
rivermont (2026-01-21 02:52:39+00:00): Thanks for the heads up; a quick search yielded https://www.csx.com/index.cfm/about-us/projects-and-partnerships/blue-ridge-subdivision-recovery/ - looks like service was restored in September! Most recent aerials are probably last March. Most mappers with short changeset comments don't actually know what they're doing, hence the initial response.

I updated the track from Erwin to Spruce Pine with the reconstruction. Aligned the best I could with the construction aerial, but a lot of it was still original TIGER alignment so still improved... Also fixed several spur tracks.

Now to deal with the massive river relation.....
rivermont (2025-12-05 03:32:06+00:00): Hello,
why did you 'change type' back on this way? Railroad does not exist here today
DaDapperMapper (2025-10-27 17:29:43+00:00): Correction: Source used was Vantor satellite imagery via Vantor Hub 2025-08-01; Esri World Imagery; Mapillary
osm_sense (2025-10-24 18:01:31+00:00): Wir taggen/kartieren nur Sichtbares, nicht das, was erst in 50/100 Jahren geplant ist.

Über unser/mein Tagging hier, wie das korrekt oder verbessert/korrigiert werden soll, darf und soll diskutiert werden - aber wir taggen/kartieren nur Sichtbares, nicht das, was in der Zukunft sichtbar sein wird.

ref: https://www.in-zukunft-laupen.ch/teilprojekte/hochwasserschutz-und-revitalisierung-sense/

PS: Ansonsten Dank an ach90 für seine Updates an den Bauarbeiten in dieser Umgebung.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-24 17:31:25+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Poniatowskiego":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/250058391
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/622311896
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/622312101

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
𝙢𝙖𝙧𝙖𝙯𝙯𝙚𝙧 ദ്ദി ᗜˬᗜ✧ (2025-10-24 19:53:39+00:00): Hej, dzięki. Nie zauważyłem przy zmianie nazwy ulicy.
user_5359 (2025-10-25 07:55:37+00:00): Please be careful! You moved the four nodes more than 100 meters over streets and buildings. 
I must reverted your chnge set. Please take a new try to add ALPR withwout destroying the existing streets.
habi (2025-11-21 08:20:30+00:00): Ciao compass123
I'm looking at 'funny' building-values in Switzerland and stumbled over https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1689321 which you've tagged as `building=monastery;yes` here.

Putting the whole monastery in a relation is probably a good choice, but removing the building tags from the single buildings is not.

I'm putting the single building tags back onto the single buildings and encompassing all of them in a site-relation, OK?

Greetings,
habi
habi (2025-11-21 09:23:14+00:00): I've moved the building tags back in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174939430 and moved the monastery tags to the 'outline' of the monastery in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1058340048
compass123 (2025-11-25 20:40:56+00:00): Hi habi,
You're absolutely right! Thanks for fixing the mess!!
Best,
compass123
eggie (2025-10-24 17:55:02+00:00): Welkom bij OSM.

Tip Probeer op de bestaande adresnode bij te taggen.
Die staat op het gebouw 
Bestaat Stork hier nog.
Nu staan er twee bedrijven getagd.

Mvg
eggie
eggie (2025-10-24 19:09:44+00:00): Info samengevoegd met adresnode
Emble agency (2025-10-24 20:43:27+00:00): Bedankt voor de feedback. Het gebouw/hudige gebouw is inmiddels opgesplist en er zitten meerdere bedrijven. Kun je die adres node ook opknippen?
eggie (2025-10-24 20:54:00+00:00): We zetten in geval van meerdere bedrijven die hetzelfde adres delen gewoon nog een adresnode.
Stork had ik verwijderd. 

Ik heb even een identiek adresnode bijgemaakt. Die kun je evt een aantal keren kopiëren en van bedrijfsinfo voorzien. 

MVG
eggie
dypa (2025-10-25 14:46:43+00:00): Полигон здания нарисован поверх забора, здание удалено см https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173759349
Ozon OSM16 (2026-07-01 07:25:10+00:00): Здравствуйте, спасибо, буду внимательнее
Jrachi (2025-10-25 08:15:45+00:00): Ciao.
Ti prego di non modificare le relazioni di percorsi escursionistici del catasto nazionale.
Li riconosci per la presenza del tag ref:REI
Se ti trovi ad inserire rotonde o comunque a modificare way dove passa una relazione hiking, ti prego, mandami un messaggio.
Comunque sia. Prima di modificare considera queste regole:
1) i percorsi devono essere lineari, senza interruzioni o diramazioni
2) su una rotonda o su una piazza il percorso segue la way mappata più corta, a meno che sul terreno vi siano delle difficoltà che consiglino altrimenti.
3) su una way può passare un solo percorso. Eccezione è quando due percorsi si incrociano su un'area aperta e come way disegnate si sovrappongono per (massimo) 20 metri (circa).
3A) in casi si trova una sovrapposizione occorre avvisare l'ente responsabile segnalando il problema (potrebbe essere un errore del catasto o un errore di mappatura.

Ivo
user_5359 (2025-10-25 07:48:38+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice a name isn't a address! Did you see https://www.osm.org/way/419909888? Please move a address to the main building, not to the street crossing.
FS Patagonia (2026-06-20 16:47:09+00:00): Hola Andrés!
Para la próxima, ojo con las direcciones! Pusiste [addr:city=Trelew] en la ciudad de Toay, con [addr:postcode=] incorrectos. 
Hoy los corregí, saludos!
AndresDuhour (2026-06-22 11:19:28+00:00): Gracias Federico! Me di cuenta en otras ediciones que el complemento de JOSM para agregar direcciones me cambiaba la ciudad. Debe haber sido eso que lo agregó sin que me de cuenta.
ntzm (2026-06-04 09:57:22+00:00): What is the meaning of lanes=-1?
webfil (2026-06-19 18:23:38+00:00): I don't know. This tag was inherited from the Canvec import, when joining multiple objects with similar tags. You may rather ask J. N. Squire (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/29742958).
eggie (2025-10-24 19:11:56+00:00): Beste ,

name= niet gebruiken om iets te beschrijven. Ook niet in het Engels.
Ik heb name= ...  verwijderd
MVG
eggie
FroschForscher (2025-11-03 19:04:51+00:00): Hallo wermak,
du hast hier eine Straße (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25121877) umbenannt ("Im Grünen Winkel" -> "Im Grünen Winke") ohne addr:street an den Häusern anzupassen.
Bitte nochmal prüfen und Straße Rückumbenennen bzw. addr:street anpassen.

FroschForscher
wermak (2025-11-04 23:36:56+00:00): Straßenname korrigiert. 
Danke für den Hinweis.
Bartek444 (2025-10-24 21:57:02+00:00): Przystanek tramwajowy to nie jest highway=platform tylko railway=platform i na Wzgórzach przy tych peronach nie będzie autobusów.
Podczas edycji skasowałeś dodane punkty zatrzymania oraz relacje, a następnie dodałeś miejsce zatrzymania od nowa. W jakim celu tak robisz? dlaczego skasowałeś relacje?
To już kolejna taka edycja którą wykonałeś. Kasując linie kasujesz całą historie.
Jako źródło podałeś "Orthophotomap", Na którym zdjęciu widać te nowo powstałe obiekty.
networkException (2025-11-17 17:55:28+00:00): Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access?uselang=en#Possible_tagging_mistakes against the use of access=bus
bicyclett (2025-12-17 08:21:03+00:00): ok, thanks. it is fixed now:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176037692
user_5359 (2025-10-25 08:16:25+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1444576677. What is the mean of the tag Aarayaaraq = Kipuusagvik?
draconic_mapper (2025-10-25 10:21:10+00:00): Hi, thanks for finding that. It means I should have taken a break from mapping earlier :P It was a mistake while entering name, I typed over the key instead of the value in the dialog ;) I have fixed it, along with the street next to it where the same happened.
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2025-10-25 05:23:21+00:00): Merhaba. Değiştirdiğiniz yol sınıflarının doğru olduğuna emin misiniz? Bölgeyi bilmiyorum fakat uydu görüntülerinden anlaşıldığı kadarıyla Bağdat Caddesi'ne paralel yol ile Adalı Sokağı'nın yol sınıfının, Bağdat Caddesi ile aynı yol sınıfında olması düşük bir ihtimal gibi duruyor.(Yol sınıfını değiştirdiğiniz diğer değişikliğinizde de benzer bir durum var gibi duruyor. Ona da ayrıca yorum yazmadım.)

Lütfen bkz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tr:Turkey_roads_tagging

Ayrıca bkz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway#Values

Gerçekten yol sınıflarının değiştirdiğiniz şekilde olması gerektiğine emin misiniz?
carameljm (2025-11-07 16:26:52+00:00): Idem als bij andere wijzigingsset. Deze weg ligt er in de praktijk niet.
4004 (2025-10-25 21:55:44+00:00): здравствуйте, спасибо за правку.
раз у клиники есть территория, то теги клиники на нее стоит вешать (перевесил, заменил теги больницы).
ну и название на территорию тоже бы не помешало, если есть
MatveiKaKei (2025-10-25 22:08:31+00:00): Здравствуйте, спасибо вам также за поправку тегов территории клиники, насчёт название самой территории клиники я не знаю
4004 (2025-10-25 22:17:12+00:00): вроде, она? Бобровичская врачебная амбулатория.http://healthcare.by/instinfo.php?orgnum=20534
MatveiKaKei (2025-10-25 22:26:05+00:00): На этот сайт зайти не смог потому что выдает ошибку но я зашёл через другой сайт и название подходит
laaber (2025-11-09 18:13:49+00:00): Meanwhile, they've mounted a new cigarette vending machine. I didn't check if it's from the same company (Wolters Tabakwaren)
HantDX (2025-10-24 20:34:47+00:00): На самом деле, первый этаж/уровень земли - это level=0, а не level=1. См. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:level
MatveiKaKei (2025-10-25 22:29:05+00:00): А ну да, спасибо за поправку!
Glassman (2025-10-26 00:19:08+00:00): #TIP: add the address to the house outline. Just select the outline in the editor and fill in the address fields.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173733446
notmyproblem1 (2025-10-24 20:09:07+00:00): sorry for the big changeset
Comino (2025-10-25 07:23:59+00:00): Hi,

In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes".

Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag !
Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead.

For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Merchants#tagging-guidance
and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bitcoin

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
https://btcmap.org/tagger/6794624
Comino (2025-10-25 07:27:37+00:00): PLUS also please REMOVE the payment:cryptocurrencies=yes !

The tag "payment:cryptocurrencies=*" was a payment tag proposal which was rejected by the OSM community. Use this tag only when cryptocurrencies are NOT accepted.
Source: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Cryptocurrencies_with_payment_tag and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:payment:*#Cryptocurrencies
Jrachi (2025-10-25 08:21:25+00:00): Le relazioni di percorsi a catasto nazionale non possono avere diramazioni.
Qui hai sdoppiato la relazione su un incrocio. 716B
user_5359 (2025-10-25 07:36:02+00:00): Hello! Thanks for your modification.
Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/18068055, https://www.osm.org/way/35415556. There are still road overlaps here that cannot be resolved without local knowledge.
yrtimiD (2025-11-04 00:17:09+00:00): if possible, please always try to modify existing items instead of deleting and creating a new one. this is important for preserving editing history.