piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Gregory Peony (2025-12-15 05:10:15+00:00): Hi, the vast majority of footprints here are valid, though could be more accurate. good going mapping the semicircle here, but it looks to me that it represents a yard and not a building.

After tracing and tagging features which are likely square or round, please remember to square their corners `q`, or circularise them `o`, because it is almost impossible and time consuming to draw shapes so percisely manually. Buildings with metal or pitched roofs tend to have square corners; round buildings are identifiable by the distinctive cresent shaped shadow they cast. Unless the building is clearly a different shape then it's best to assume that it should be rounded or its corners should be squared. In the ID Editor, you can `right click` for access to editing functions. Since roofs tend to overhang walls trace the initial shape slightly smaller to allow a buffer for any change in size which may occur. In JOSM use the [buildingstools plugin](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/BuildingsTools). In ID you must draw the shape accurately enough if you want every corner to be squared. This [video about squaring features in ID](https://youtu.be/Xs5wX592E1o) has more information and a demo.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-03-27 16:37:48+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1457602991/history

is 
golf = green 2
instead of 
golf=green
deliberate here?
0235 (2025-12-11 00:03:41+00:00): Thankyou for your updates with the separate pavements, but please try and keep the paths connected to the roads in some places, you can use "highway=footway" + "footway=link" on these small connections, especially in residential areas like this where not everywhere has a pavement, so you would need to walk in the road in some areas.

Thank you,
Richard.
Snorlax20 (2025-12-11 00:55:51+00:00): Hello Richard,
Thank you for letting me know about this as I was not aware of the issue.
Changeset: 175781300 should correct the routing by adding footway links and crossings where needed. If possible, please could you confirm.
Thank you.
0235 (2025-12-11 08:40:18+00:00): Perfect, and the kerbs at the pedestrian crossings ❤️. 

Pavement mapping is surprisingly complicated, and the OSM Wiki sometimes can be a bit of a maze to figure it out. I have 11 different wiki pages bookmarked just for pavement mapping!
t_ja (2025-12-10 21:08:00+00:00): Ahoj,
prosim nespajaj nesuvisiace objekty dokopy, v tomto konkretnom pripade si zlepil chodnik a chranenu oblast, zopar prikladov:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9530476391
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9530476416
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9530476453
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13368159367

Ked bude niekto upravovat trasu chodnika, bude posuvat aj hranice oblasti, co je uplne zle :(

T.
radokado (2025-12-10 21:18:17+00:00): Vďaka za upozornenie, odpojil som to.
Rado
QuiLe (2025-12-10 20:52:39+00:00): Hi Welcome to OSM! We cannot use Google Maps as a source. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Don%27t_copy_from_other_maps for more information.
Mezerklonzan (2025-12-10 21:17:08+00:00): That's fine. I saw this with my own eyes earlier today. I was disappointed that it has been there so long but I never noticed it.
Gregory Peony (2025-12-10 21:58:14+00:00): The fooprints you mapped here, but they could be more accurate.

When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom out to obtain the orientation and shape, then zoom in so that you can accurately draw the footprint. Exclude shadows and yards when tracing the footprint. Keep in mind that you are looking at the [roofs of buildings](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape#Roof_shape), but mapping their footprints. Depending on how the scene is lit, pitched roofs may have light and dark sections that belong to one building. Generally pitched roofs overhang the walls of a building, so a footprint slightly smaller than the roof is accurate. You can scale selected features in ID with `shift+(-/+)`, or JOSM with `ctrl.+alt+Lclick & drag`.  Take care to make contributions that others can build upon.
dpolovinkin (2025-12-11 20:46:55+00:00): добрый день, у вас все комменты это "дороги" или "пои", можете плиз по существу подробней писать что именно меняете, "дороги" ничего не говорят
 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Good_changeset_comments
dpolovinkin (2025-12-28 17:46:37+00:00): ответите? я вижу что продолжаете добавлять те же самые ничего не говорящие комменты...
NeisBot (2025-12-14 07:56:53+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Home Aire Care Heating and Air Conditioning Trenton"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-12-16 17:27:55+00:00): 🔴 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the original contributor or remaining promotional text in description tags by https://osm.org/changeset/176016432
German C (2025-12-11 15:02:07+00:00): Hola Lolj, no debes eliminar edificios cuando estos si existen en la imagen satelital, lo que se debe hacer es mejorar la geometría de esos edificios, si aparece un edificio pero es una cancha debes corregir en vez de eliminar, si aparece otro edificio pero es una piscina debes corregir en vez de eliminar https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=175776749 (en rojo esta resaltados los edificios que eliminaste)
TrickyFoxy (2025-12-10 23:32:26+00:00): Это автоматы по продаже воды?
Jarek 🚲 (2025-12-19 15:13:35+00:00): Hey Nate, when adding sidewalks like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1457613663 please also make sure to update roadways like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/35797445 to have sidewalk:both=separate (or sidewalk:left/sidewalk:right if sidewalk is only on one side).

I also encourage you to add is_sidepath:of:name tag to the sidewalk way, so that the street name can be used when routing :) see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1444277024 for an example
NeisBot (2025-12-11 17:20:13+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 65 potential crossings.

Problematic elements (top 3 by category):
https://osm.org/way/910949017 v1 | crossings=19
https://osm.org/way/504848135 v2 | crossings=16
https://osm.org/way/448205636 v13 | crossings=15

Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/6298823366 v2
https://osm.org/node/8458692705 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=175777348
NeisBot (2025-12-11 17:27:01+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175789019
pitscheplatsch (2025-12-11 21:59:32+00:00): ok
wisielec (2025-12-10 21:26:43+00:00): Ale jakie masz podstawy do wycofywania. 4 lata było tutaj secondary które jest logiczne, ktoś to ruszył i znowu wojna edycyjna.
Dawid2849 (2025-12-10 22:32:10+00:00): Tylko w wyniku przeoczenia. W dodatku Ty od 4 lat nie masz prawa do wykonywania edycji.
Dawid2849 (2025-12-10 22:32:35+00:00): Jakichkolwiek edycji, nawet tych poprawnych pragnę podkreślić.
osmmapper222 (2025-12-10 21:56:50+00:00): Tipp: wenn du im iD-Editor Gebäude mit möglichst rechten Winkeln anlegen möchtest, dann kannst du nach dem groben Einzeichnen das Polygon anklicken und die Taste q drücken.

Man kann auch einen einzelnen Knoten eines Polygons anklicken, z.B. in einer Ecke und q drücken, um einen rechten Winkel zu erhalten.
TornadoFang (2025-12-10 21:58:28+00:00): ah...hier lerne ich mehr als damals in der schulzeit ;-)
CAM-Gerlach (2026-05-24 22:41:48+00:00): Stripped SEO spam tags, and fixed incorrect opening hours and address tags in changeset 183129696

https://osm.org/changeset/183129696
JuanElDemografo (2025-12-10 22:46:12+00:00): You should keep the edits you make in geographically small areas when possible. This one goes from a small village in Africa to a cornfield in the middle of North America.

You added your name on a node in that Nebraskan cornfield and added a pedestrian crossing where I can't see any with the imagery you apparently used. You also removed the highway tag from the road outside the village in east Africa. Why?

Your previous edits also seem to be similarly poor quality and should be fixed.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175778876
dmjab13 (2025-12-11 13:43:07+00:00): Horrible changeset
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-01-18 20:47:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 177391275 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious changes in Somali, Ethiopia and the USA
cquest (2025-12-11 08:38:16+00:00): Hello hello !

Je vois des doublons sur phone=* + contact:phone=*

Il faudrait choisir ;)

C'est corrigé grâce à https://confusedbuffalo.github.io/phone-report/france/ile-de-france.html
CelianGdfrd (2025-12-11 18:24:06+00:00): Mince !! J'étais persuadé d'avoir vérifié. Merci beaucoup !!
Hugoren Martinako (2025-12-17 18:06:49+00:00): Mesedez, kale bati izena aldatzen diozun BETI, gogoratu hari lotutako helbideak ere aldatzea (addr:street)
trial (2025-12-11 20:32:30+00:00): Bonjour, l'ortho PCRS Raster est sur le coin bien meilleure qu'un relevé GPS.
Bellevue de Kerantro et Rue des Fleurs ; la piste cyclable a un nom ?
jupiter56 (2025-12-11 23:42:46+00:00): Bonjour,
si vous avez de meilleurs données je vous invite de corriger les miens.

Non, il n'y a pas encore de nom officiel d'après mes connaissances. En plus la voie verte sera continué au delà du pont jusqu'au bourg de Caudan, encore en travaux. Ouverture prévue le 17/12/2025.

En plus il y a des parties non réglementaires pour une voie verte car trop étroite et pas assez entretenues. J'avertirai la mairie pour ça.
rarad74 (2025-12-11 05:22:59+00:00): Salut. Te rog sa folosesti ESRI Standard ca imagini. Sunt mai bine centrate si sunt mai noi. 
Numai bine!
Alexuc1306 (2025-12-11 09:00:19+00:00): Salut, in regula, multumesc!
schobbish (2026-07-31 03:02:15+00:00): nice
ooosssay (2026-07-31 04:11:20+00:00): very
chris66 (2025-12-20 09:43:48+00:00): Hi N9713,

bist Du der Hauptbearbeiter dieser Rad-SuperRoute?

Ich bekomme in JOSM immer 1000 Warnungen beim Editieren im Raum Hilter.

Anscheinend dürfen SuperRouten KEINE Ways enthalten, sondern nur andere Routen-Relationen?

Bin da aber kein Experte.
N9713 (2025-12-22 18:56:12+00:00): Hi chris66, nein, bin nicht der Hauptbearbeiter. Ich weiß nur, dass die Relation vor ein paar Monaten von type=route auf =superroute umgestellt wurde. Vielleicht hilft dir dir der Änderungssatz https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166876194 und die zugehörige Diskussion weiter?
chris66 (2025-12-22 19:04:14+00:00): Alles klar, danke fürs Melden. :)
German C (2025-12-11 15:09:18+00:00): Hola Lolj, ¿por que eliminaste los edificios y las otras áreas como la cancha? No debes eliminar edificios para volverlos a construir, lo que se debe hacer es mejorar la geometría https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Mantener_el_historial en el siguiente link en rojo se resaltará lo que eliminaste https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=175780158
MarinoBM (2025-12-13 16:45:51+00:00): Hola miguelgilpa, gracias por tus aportaciones a OpenStreetMap.
La etiqueta highway=bridleway se utiliza para caminos de uso "prioritariamente" a caballo.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dbridleway
Como se comentó en el Foro de OSM, esta característica no es habitual en España.
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/caminos-reservados-o-prioritarios-para-jinetes-en-espana/97221
La recomendación es cambiar el etiquetado por el de camino o sendero, según sus caraterísticas.
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2hdU
Cualquier duda la puedes plantear en alguno de los grupos de OSM en Telegram.
https://t.me/osmcyl
Un saludo.
SpinOff (2025-12-17 22:20:41+00:00): Zmiana jest niepoprawna. Według wiki, nawet jeśli ulica ma tylko nazwisko patrona, w OSM dodajemy także imię: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Znakowanie_dr%C3%B3g_w_Polsce#Nazewnictwo_ulic
mаs (2025-12-12 23:08:27+00:00): Wouldn't Isle of Palms be categorized as a city, rather than a town? Their official website states it as "The City of Isle of Palms." https://iop.net
Joseph R P (2025-12-12 23:19:57+00:00): Places in OSM aren't classified based on their legal status but rather their population and regional importance, and the place classification hierarchy is not 1-1 with these legal classifications either given that they vary by state and country. The tagging scheme works similar to how on a globe or physical map labels will appear larger and bolder based on a city or town's population and prominence. South Carolina has 71 municipalities that are incorporated as cities, but a lot of them have very low populations, such as Chesnee with 829. Putting these places in the same boat as Columbia, Charleston, or even smaller regionally-significant places like Orangeburg and Anderson would be excessive.
mаs (2025-12-12 23:24:30+00:00): Ok, thanks for letting me know. I didn't know about this until now.
Taya_S (2025-12-11 05:22:20+00:00): Reverted deletions

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175785912
flohoff (2025-12-11 09:03:07+00:00): Auch diese Turn Restriction ist erfunden. Keine durchgezogene linie:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19947962

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19947964

Und die hier verstehe ich gar nicht - wieso "no_left_turn"? Entweder ist das auch ein "no_u_turn" (Was hier auch falsch ist - kein verbot) - aber no_left_turn?!?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19947961
flohoff (2025-12-11 09:04:15+00:00): Der ist auch quatsch:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19947963
stirps (2025-12-11 17:07:12+00:00): Auch hier sind mMn durchgezogene Linien, siehe https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=51.93761050431698&lng=8.446380551925358&z=19.9&pKey=725930113681167&focus=photo und https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=51.937928863316074&lng=8.445346014647953&z=19.9&pKey=659087135679134&focus=photo
Der no left turn führt auf den anderen Ast zum Kreisverkehr hin, ich habe keine Ahnung wieso sich iD hier für einen no left turn statt no u turn entschieden hat.

Und auch beim letzten: Ich würde die zusammenlaufenden durchgezogenen Linien auch als no u-turn verstehen (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=51.93803310000001&lng=8.446586400000001&z=19.9&pKey=1633545197071010&focus=photo)
flohoff (2025-12-11 17:29:31+00:00): Ja - und dann guck dir in der Draufsicht mal an wo deine turn restrictions sind. Jeweils dort wo die durchgezogene linie untebrochen ist.

Also braucht es genau an DER stelle eben keine turn restriction mehr. Es macht sinn die Fahrbahntrennung genau bis dahin zu ziehen damit eben dort KEINE turn restriction mehr braucht.

Jede entfernte turn restriction ist gut. Die sind einfach der quell aller routingprobleme.

https://tmp.zz.de/20251211-FlaringImmature/Screenshot_from_2025-12-11_18-27-40.png
https://tmp.zz.de/20251211-FlaringImmature/Screenshot_from_2025-12-11_18-27-29.png
https://tmp.zz.de/20251211-FlaringImmature/Screenshot_from_2025-12-11_18-27-23.png
colt04 (2026-01-02 05:23:49+00:00): rayKiddy,
thank you for taking time to document flock cameras. I visited that location in person and I was not able to confirm any flock camera. I saw regular traffic light sensor cameras (4 cameras) mounted on the traffic light boom. could you please double check that node to confirm the flock camera at that location? if there was some confusion - please let's remove that node from the database.
colt04 (2026-01-17 03:43:15+00:00): I removed the data as there is no camera at that location
schobbish (2025-12-11 01:15:05+00:00): LGTM, welcome to OpenStreetMap!
Glassman (2025-12-12 00:38:01+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175781217
schobbish (2025-12-11 01:16:06+00:00): LGTM!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175781259
Achmad Alqadri (2026-04-08 00:42:37+00:00): Menghapus tag is_in membuat kebingunngan pada titik lokasi khususnya yang belum terpetakan batas administrasinya
FajrAl (2026-04-08 00:51:41+00:00): Tag is_in=* sudah usang atau tidak digunakan lagi di OSM. Dalam validator JOSM juga diharuskan menghapus tag tersebut.
Jarek 🚲 (2025-12-19 15:30:33+00:00): hey, thanks. is there a pedestrian crossing too?
schobbish (2025-12-11 01:17:32+00:00): Looks like you meant to include this in your previous changeset but that's okay
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175781424
schobbish (2025-12-11 01:20:45+00:00): What's your source for the addresses/names of the businesses?
dknelson9876 (2025-12-11 04:07:53+00:00): Hi cas79, welcome to OSM and mapping in Utah! What is your source for the phone numbers you added here to the seminary and church building? Given that church buildings don't have phones in them anymore, I don't expect them to have a phone number that doesn't change.
Helferlein2 (2025-12-11 01:44:21+00:00): Looks OK to me.
redd (2025-12-13 09:33:20+00:00): Hallo Kartibu,
könntest du bitte deine Änderungssätze noch weiter lokal aufsplitten? 

Grüße,

redd
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-12 06:09:23+00:00): reverted, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19152

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175830507
mgpx (2026-02-15 10:18:04+00:00): Zsolt,
a módosításcsomagban több hegycsúcs jelölését is natural=volcano-ra állítottad át. Bizonyára előtte átolvastad a Wikit, ahonnan tudnod kell, hogy ezzel a címkével nem a hegycsúcsot, hanem a vulkáni kürtő helyét jelöljük.

A Börzsöny néhai vulkáni kúpja egy heves kitörés során összeomlott, helyén a kaldera maradt. A Börzsöny mai főcsúcsai a kaldera peremén helyezkednek el, nem a néhai vulkáni kürtőnél. A mai csúcsoknál téves a natural=volcano jelölés.

Kérlek, a Wiki leírását szerkesztéseid előtt mindig alaposan tanulmányozd és precízen alkalmazd.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-12-14 00:13:13+00:00): This changeset deleted the highway tag from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/51465682
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175781922
NeisBot (2025-12-11 17:20:45+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 16 potential crossings.

Problematic elements (top 3 by category):
https://osm.org/way/545013515 v4 | crossings=3
https://osm.org/way/1396651089 v2 | crossings=8

Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/32684557 v7

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=175782133
NeisRevert (2025-12-11 22:04:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/175822067
where the comment is: "Revert of unintended geometry change"
fezi0704 (2025-12-11 01:42:54+00:00): Im new on OSM, so apologies if this is a dumb question.

Why isnt the new road I made showing up on the map?
Comino (2025-12-11 01:46:09+00:00): Mo-Su 00:00-24:00 ??
BCNorwich (2025-12-12 07:19:03+00:00): Hi, Again you are duplicating highways which will disrupt routing. Way: 6 (1457648079) is a duplication of several existing highway, I've removed it.

You should have been alerted to the problem by the warnings given above.

Regards Bernard.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-04 06:40:15+00:00): Hello!

You used
foot=noc
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/692345822/history

Have you maybe meant
foot=no
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
DMRoth (2026-02-04 17:41:19+00:00): Thanks for letting me know about this. It was, indeed, a typo. The tag should be "no". I have fixed this mistake.
ezekielf (2025-12-18 01:50:53+00:00): Hi Truck-thin, I've reverted the demolished railway sections added in this changeset here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176072502

Former rail beds can be mapped in OSM where they are still visible features of the modern landscape, but where new construction other landscape modification has happened this data is out of scope for OSM.  See:  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Demolished_railways
flohoff (2025-12-11 08:48:00+00:00): Moin

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19948117/history

kannst du hier die turn restriction wieder entfernen? 

An exakt diesem Punkt ist die Mittellinie unterbrochen - es ist NATÜRLICH ein u-turn erlaubt.

Flo
flohoff (2025-12-11 08:48:25+00:00): Das gilt analog für alle 4 flares des Kreisverkehrs. Alle 4 U-Turn restrictions sind hier falsch
stirps (2025-12-11 17:03:41+00:00): Ich würde argumentieren dass da sehr wohl eine durchgezogene Linie ist, siehe auch hier: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=51.9349222&lng=8.477125&z=18.966074778391274&x=0.04615381540908259&y=0.7781164869219428&zoom=0.05771941155636013&pKey=721984504034080&focus=photo
stirps (2025-12-11 17:03:59+00:00): Die anderen Äste des Kreisverkehr sehen ähnlich aus
flohoff (2025-12-11 17:25:05+00:00): Hier -  NRW-DOP mit den OSM Daten.

Man sieht sehr deutlich die unterbrochene  linie.

https://tmp.zz.de/20251211-SabotagePupil/Screenshot_from_2025-12-11_18-24-02.png
flohoff (2025-12-11 17:26:01+00:00): An der Friedrichsdorfer Straße nach Westen ist gar keine linie, 

Nach norden ist die Linie ab dem Kanaldeckel unterbrochen.

Alle turn restrictions sind hier falsch
stirps (2025-12-11 18:27:49+00:00): Bzgl. des ersten: Klar fangen dann irgendwann wieder unterbrochene Linien an, aber kurz hinter der Verkehrsinsel sind die Linien durchgezogen. Darauf ist die turn restriction ja bezogen; Denn mMn ergibt es keinen Sinn die "Einbahnstraßen" direkt hinter der Verkehrsinsel zusammenzuführen. Das verwirrt nur wenn die Straßen quasi um eine halbe Fahrbahn "springen". Deswegen füge ich die in einem spitzeren Winkel etwas dahinter zusammen. Die durchgezogene Linie gibt ja aber immer noch klar an, dass hinter dem Kreisverkehr nicht gewendet werden darf. Das ist dann geografisch nicht mehr ganz akkurat, gibt im Kern aber immer noch die Regel an.

Btw SabotagePupil finde ich nett, aber ob ich das wirklich verdient habe...

Zum zweiten: Laut mapillary existiert da eine durchgezogene Linie, die ist aber sehr abgefahren. Es kann sein, dass man die auf Luftbildern nicht sieht.