piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_12500175 (2024-02-20 19:24:20+00:00): Hallo,
die Richtung der Dachneigung wird von Hoch nach Tief angegeben, so ist sie jetzt falsch herum.
gscholz (2024-02-11 06:29:31+00:00): Hi Huygens_Jnr,
your recent edits have left behind several errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=3.20997&lat=6.67027&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=147269010

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-31 17:39:49+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11603338947/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop?
user_12500175 (2024-02-21 12:23:11+00:00): Der Bau gehört meiner Meinung nach optisch und funktionell zur Kirche
kapazao (2024-02-10 08:48:07+00:00): Hola, veo que no tienes claro cómo editar, y tus comentarios en los conjuntos de cambios no son correctos, ya que no indicas qué es lo que estás editando.
Este elemento https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/772959064 lo has editado ya 10 veces a lo largo del tiempo y no está bien.
Te recomiendo que leas la wiki de OSM, y más en concreto la página https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenas_prácticas_en_España.
También siempre puedes dejar una nota con la capa de notas en la página de https://www.openstreetmap.org. Tan solo hacer click derecho y añadir una nota si no sabes bien cómo hacerlo.
Por otra parte existe un grupo de Telegram @OSMes de la comunidad española de OSM por si te interesa y ahí puedes consultar.
Un saludo y gracias por tus contribuciones.
muchichka_s (2024-02-09 19:30:49+00:00): Привіт, "Нова вулиця" в Солом'янському районі - це колишня назва вулиці Сильвестра Косова
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/74728182

https://kmr.gov.ua/sites/default/files/38-7611.pdf
Romwriter (2024-02-10 18:34:07+00:00): Hallo Hubert87, ist "motorroad=yes" noch richtig? Beste Grüße, Romwriter
Hubert87 (2024-02-11 19:04:36+00:00): Nein, nicht mehr. Danke für die Erinnerung. Ich pass das an.
Die Beginn Kraftfahrstraße Schilder sind mittlerweile weg. 
(Die Ende Kraftfahrstraße Schilder hängen aber noch, auch für den neuen Radweg :))
Romwriter (2024-02-12 16:21:04+00:00): Ja, das passt zu meiner Erinnerung :-)
emersonveenstra (2024-03-01 14:36:07+00:00): Hi there,

There's a few lane related mistakes in this changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/38893881#map=19/42.97240/-85.67731 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1246969374#map=19/42.97292/-85.68692 have different lane counts in lanes and turn:lanes

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1175923333#map=19/42.97330/-85.68361 has different counts in lanes and change:lanes

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1248279566 has different counts in lanes and destination:lanes

Could you please fix these? Thanks!
habi (2024-02-09 19:30:17+00:00): source=survey und source=https://imgur.com/a/kimDOcM gehörten noch dazu :)
Syl (2024-02-14 20:14:21+00:00): J'ai annulé ce groupe de modifications (voir https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/ajouter-le-trace-de-communes-disparues/2111).
BlueButterfly (2024-02-09 19:47:02+00:00): Correction: Source used was Esri World Imagery; Bing Streetside
Rogoyski (2024-04-28 21:04:30+00:00): Jakim cudem na podstawie zdjęcia satelitarnego przeniosłeś kawiarnię CoffeeDesk do innego budynku?
silversurfer83 (2024-02-09 20:55:16+00:00): Gude
hab da mal ne Frage zu deinen "building=electricity":
Was solln das sein? Im wiki scheint es nicht definiert zu sein und laut taginfo ist es primär in Deutschland in Verwendung.

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147271002
bahnpirat (2024-02-09 22:02:04+00:00): Es handelt sich um ein Gebäude, welches Elekroenergie-Infrastruktur enthält. Umgangssprachlich wären das Trafostation aller Art und Größen, wobei kein Trafo enthalten sein muss (=Schaltstation).
silversurfer83 (2024-02-10 04:43:47+00:00): Ah. Danke :)
Sowas dachte ich mir schon und bin nun ein wenig verwirrt, weil wir dafür, meines Verständnisses nach, doch 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dservice
haben. Darf ich fragen, warum du das nicht nutzt?
silversurfer83 (2024-02-24 04:04:39+00:00): Und?
bahnpirat (2024-02-24 09:07:21+00:00): Ja, du darfst fragen.
Ich verwende es, weil ich es möchte. Weil "building=service" in der Vergangenheit nicht meinen Ansprüchen genügte und ich mich inzwischen daran gewöhnt habe. Also aktuell aus Gewohnheit.
VA00 (2025-06-19 10:46:21+00:00): Określeń typu ,,Przepust wodny'' nie należy dawać w name, ewentualnie w description.
Udarian (2024-02-18 02:50:45+00:00): What’s the source for this
Edesma (2024-02-27 18:59:44+00:00): It is a facility of Miami-Dade County waste management (Sunset Kendall Trash and Recycling Center) and was my intention to tag it as public_work. It is not actually a Wastewater plant. What is your suggestion? Look here: https://www.miamidade.gov/global/service.page?Mduid_service=ser1464797123341331
Edesma (2024-02-27 19:03:35+00:00): Maybe amenity=recycling + recycling_type=centre ?
BCNorwich (2024-02-10 07:11:53+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Tower Bridge is already mapped as an attraction, please see here:- https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2079674503#map=19/51.50552/-0.07537&layers=N   Thus I've removed your duplicated data.

Regards Bernard.
felipeeugenio (2024-02-09 20:35:21+00:00): Hola. el nombre alternativo se pone como alt_name=
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147271589
Xvtn (2024-02-09 21:12:28+00:00): Hi! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes here. Looks good to me, no complaints! Thanks for your contributions!
user_20979216 (2024-02-09 22:12:28+00:00): Hallo Johann! Ist das Account Nummer 153?
njh399 (2024-02-09 20:35:54+00:00): I need to go back and check their opening hours
literan (2024-02-10 09:51:14+00:00): а здесь достаточно было одной "срединной" линии https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1226256876 - и она должна входить в оба мультиполигона building:part. Переделал.

собственно, это и есть одна из целей создания мультиполигонов - избавиться от лишних линий, проходящих дважды/трижды... в одних и тех же местах
csimeona22 (2024-02-09 21:13:56+00:00): Correction: Source used was Mapbox Satellite (1.50; -2.45); Strava; Mapillary.
Reinhard12 (2024-02-09 20:46:38+00:00): Kommentar vergessen:
Updates Hervest
source: survey
mcliquid (2024-02-10 08:23:05+00:00): Hi,

please note: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
Valerio_Bozzolan (2026-06-24 08:28:13+00:00): For your interest, there is the possibility to split these Rome subway entrances in 2 relationships: so to better reflect that not all entrances communicate underground. So to better reflect that some entrances lead to a direction, and some others lead to the other one.

Note:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5310186

On wiki discussion:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:railway%3Dsubway_entrance#c-Valeriobozz-20260624082500-Kovposch-20260623173100
Smaten (2024-02-09 22:01:22+00:00): naja, passt schon besser: Korrekterweise ist Hausnummer 11 (Vorderhaus ein Pfarrhaus mit Durchgang, der direkt auf eine alte feste Treppe in das Hinterhaus Nummer 11 führt. (Treppenbreite: halbe Gebäudetiefe) An dieses Gebäude grenzt hier korrekt ein Anbau, der ebenfalls zu Hausnummer 11 (Hinterhaus gehört). Das Hinterhaus und der Anbau ist ein Kindergarten mit dem Namen "ev. Kindergarten Alexandraschule"
gscholz (2024-02-11 06:49:22+00:00): Hi Wamdai Isah Gazama,
your recent edits have left behind several errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=7.43015&lat=10.53795&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=147272409

Can you please fix this?

This kind of result is very typical for JOSM users who just press "o" and do not care about the results. You can apply the internal validator to avoid uploading such errors.

Kind regards
Guido
NorthCrab_upload (2024-02-09 21:10:22+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3876031262
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/910831622

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
WieKo68 (2024-06-10 19:45:50+00:00): poprawione
eggie (2024-02-09 21:45:12+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback Alle begin is moeilijk. We zetten in OSM Nederland geen adresgegevens op de gebouwomtrek. Er is immers een adresnode. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-02-09 22:14:11+00:00): Adres weer verwijderd
Tomas_J (2025-08-10 11:43:02+00:00): Ahoj, tu (Node: 272841423), si nespravne vyznacil crossign:island. Opravil som na crossing:island=no. Daj na to, prosim, v buducnosti pozor. Dik.
eggie (2024-02-09 21:49:58+00:00): Dit is een lastige, want het zit in een mp relatie. Zal het zo aanpassen. 
Dat gaat niet goed met een luchtfoto.
Je hebt hier ook wegen op elkaar geplakt. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-02-09 22:01:52+00:00): Gebouw uitgelijnd mbv BGT
mueschel (2024-02-10 18:37:05+00:00): Hi,
please don't use "wikimedia_commons2". You could either 

- have both entries in one tag, separated by a ';' (preferred).
- or use the usual scheme for numbering tags with ':2' (only if the value gets too long or is not readable any more)
zby-cz (2024-02-12 09:44:20+00:00): Hi, thanks for your feedback, appreciated. :)

According to this wiki page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multiple_values
suffixes are fine. Unfortunately, we can't use semicolons, first because it would hit 255 chars limit, and second, because we need to accompany each image with `:path` tag - see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikimedia_commons:path 

The MV rules document several suffixes, and let the user decide. I searched through taginfo and found just "*1" more common than "*_1". But I am open to use any of those two. 

I don't particulary favor "*:1", becuase colons are often use for subtags - which this is not.
mueschel (2024-02-12 09:52:25+00:00): It's a bit difficult to judge which of :1 and _1 is better. Almost all _1 are from old imports of data (tiger, TMC). On the other hand, there are approved tagging schemes that explicitly use :1.  

Just '1' seems very uncommon, apart from some heavy use on names in the arabic region and various foreign, imported tags.
zby-cz (2024-02-12 10:47:59+00:00): Well, in that case - we can go with "wikimedia_commons:1" and "wikimedia_commons:1:path". That perhaps looks a little better. 

Btw, can you link the tags:1 which are approved? I don't know how to find it :) In taginfo i looked for "image", "url" etc. but they are not that significant.

Also should we start with :1 or :2 ? 🙂🤔
mueschel (2024-02-12 13:18:45+00:00): The most prominent one (by looking at tags and actual use in maps) is the seamark:* namespace - although I saw that this was never voted on. 
On other tags that occasionally require long values like inscription and destination/direction it's also pretty common (but not approved) to use the colon as separator.

I personally don't care if we start with 1 or 2 - as long as the numbers are correctly sorted in cases where it matters.
zby-cz (2024-02-12 17:11:28+00:00): Thanks for the additional info. Let's go with ":1" here as well then. I will change the tags in all (our) existing objects and on the wiki page of path.
zby-cz (2024-02-18 15:26:27+00:00): Done here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147613575

Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikimedia_commons:path#More_images
VictorIE (2024-02-10 15:44:04+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1206417264
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1248318147

There are two overlapping buildings here.
Paul Berry (2024-03-18 21:45:33+00:00): Resolved on changeset #148835925.
Spearfish7424 (2024-02-09 21:55:34+00:00): I encountered error code 429 (Upload has been blocked due to rate limiting. Please try again later). There is about a quarter of the data left to upload. I did contact the DWG earlier this week to ensure I would not encounter a rate limit error and they gave me the go ahead. I will resume the upload in about an hour. Thanks for your patience.
Spearfish7424 (2024-02-09 22:08:07+00:00): Also, the ways connected to these nodes are at the very bottom of the upload list in JOSM, so the import will appear as unconnected nodes until it is completed.
eggie (2024-02-09 23:00:21+00:00): Eigenlijk is moped=yes al de default. 
De regel moped=no had gewoon weggekund.
Gr eggie
NickHermuhlen (2024-02-09 23:01:47+00:00): Klopt was ik ookal achtergekomen en wist dat ik het nog moest aanpassen maar helemaal vergeten excuus
CurlingMan13 (2024-02-10 05:33:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted. Access tags should be used instead to restrict access, rather than deleting the features all together. You can read why it won't be deleted here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147280635
ceyu (2024-02-23 22:51:04+00:00): Hallo Bdea,
Warum wurde hier addr:city vom Cafe Domgassner entfernt?
Bdea (2024-02-24 07:59:05+00:00): Hallo,
das war wohl ein Anfängerfehler und keine Absicht! Ich war eigentlich auf der Suche nach der Ursache, warum die von mir eingetragene “Praxis Anoki” in der 8.MaiStr 15 nicht ordentlich aufscheint.
Wenn Sie dabei helfen könnten, wäre ich sehr dankbar für ein Review.
Gerold
ceyu (2024-02-24 08:55:04+00:00): Es ist kein Problem, wenn einmal ein Fehler passiert, aber es wäre toll, wenn Sie die Adresse des Cafe Domgassner wieder reparieren würden :)

Ein wichtiger Grundsatz der OSM ist "Beim Attributieren nicht danach richten, was der Renderer daraus macht":
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Taggen_Renderer

Beispielsweise scheint shop=yes für die Praxis Anoki nicht zutreffend zu sein und sollte wieder entfernt werden. Bitte wirklich nur korrekte Tags eintragen und nicht solange herumversuchen, bis eine gewünschte Darstellung erreicht wird. Es kann auch einmal sein, dass ein Eintrag nicht auf openstreetmap.org dargestellt wird. Diese Einträge sind aber trotzdem in den Daten vorhanden und können dann von Apps, Navigationsgeräten, ... die OSM Daten verwenden, ausgewertet werden. Die OSM Carto Darstellung (die Darstellung, die man auf openstreetmap.org sieht), ist nur als eine Art Vorschau der vorhandenen Daten gedacht und nicht das Maß der Dinge.
BCNorwich (2024-02-11 09:42:29+00:00): Hi, These two highways are designated as Public Rights of Way. Thus there is public access on foot along these private service roads. I've amended the tags to suit.

Regards Bernard.
TomPar (2024-02-11 01:58:17+00:00): Hello.  What supporting data do you have to call this road access=private?  The town's tax map shows there is a recreational easement on this.

https://www.hartford-vt.org/DocumentCenter/View/8849/Tax-Map---13-PDF

Please provide some more information.

Thanks.
A Hall (2024-02-12 15:04:12+00:00): I second TomPar's concern with this edit. Can onX share some of its editing practices so local reviewers understand what information is being used to make edits? This stretch of road is documented on the town level and the state level for recreational use and access=private implies NO access whatsoever. The two are in conflict and we'd love to get this right so the groups who can use this know they can use it, but also properly communicate to use cases that should NOT be using this
Adam Franco (2024-02-13 16:18:02+00:00): See also:
* https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Vermont#Road_Ownership_and_Access
* https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Vermont#Town_Highway_and_Legal_Trail_details
Adam Franco (2024-02-13 16:23:59+00:00): From https://maps.vtrans.vermont.gov/Maps/TownMapSeries/WINDSOR_Co/HARTFORD/HARTFORD_MILEAGE_2022.pdf it does look like the Town "discontinued" part of the road, which would revert that segment to "ownership=private". I don't have on-the-ground knowledge as to whether it is posted as "No trespassing" or other access restriction though.
onxmaps_wmartin (2024-02-15 16:37:22+00:00): This was reported to onX via the phone by a customer/landowner in the immediate area. They stated they were having issues with people trespassing on this road. They stated "You will see Orizzonto Road with two unconnected pieces and empty space between the two.  The only part that continues to be Orizzonto Road comes off Rustic Road and is a town road.  The part coming off Neal Road is no longer Orizzonto, it's Owls Nest Drive, which is a private driveway with two homes on it.  Beyond the second home is an impassable trail.  There are multiple private trails off this driveway, but the entire driveway, and the trails, are very clearly marked for PRIVATE ROAD and NO MOTORIZED VEHICLES." We followed up with the information that you all provided and asked for more information to corroborate their claim.
Syl (2024-02-14 20:14:14+00:00): J'ai annulé ce groupe de modifications (voir https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/ajouter-le-trace-de-communes-disparues/2111).
Spearfish7424 (2024-02-09 22:20:53+00:00): Hi Danny, I'm currently in the process of a large import of buildings on the island of MTL. To avoid accidental overlaps, would it be possible to put this kind of contribution (and only this kind) on hold for about an hour? Thank you so much and apologies. For more information, you can see the following: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/proposed-import-of-buildings-in-montreal/108639/10
Spearfish7424 (2024-02-09 22:39:13+00:00): Everything is now uploaded on my end. Please disregard the above comment and thank you for your understanding :)
elsy1 (2024-02-10 07:20:13+00:00): ثبت اطلاعات غلط و تغییر نام خیابان ها به نام کسب و کار خرابکاری میباشد لطفا این کارو نکنید تشکر.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-02-09 22:31:28+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11605818743

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
G_P_J (2024-02-09 22:41:20+00:00): Poprawione.
CurlingMan13 (2024-02-10 05:42:03+00:00): Please do not simulate holes like how you have done,

Please read:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#:~:text=Wrapping%20polygon%20areas%20around%20a%20hole%20and%20leaving%20a%20tiny%20open%20gap.
BCNorwich (2024-02-11 10:00:57+00:00): Hi, A few problems. Way: 1248342808, Way: 1248342809, and Way: 1248342810 are duplications of existing highways. This duplication disrupts routing so I've removed them.

If a way needs amending or correcting this should be done to any existing ways so that the way history is maintained. I've amended the existing highway tags to show the public status as per the Blackburn and Darwen definitive map.

Regards Bernard.
Growebis (2024-02-16 09:12:59+00:00): Thank you.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-18 08:30:16+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11606152460/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
Steve Marquis (2025-04-20 12:05:31+00:00): It's a house (made out of straw bales and larch timber frames and cladding.  Trading is in the open where there is any and usually harvested at the time. We might add a stand at the road for eggs, etc.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-28 23:08:27+00:00): so what is being sold here? vegetables?
Jordi MF (2024-02-10 00:39:50+00:00): Hola,

Has añadido una línea administrativa con nombre, lo cual no es correcto según las normas de etiquetado de OpenStreetMap. ¿Qué información pretendías añadir? Como esta línea no es correcta, la elimino.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-02-09 22:50:40+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11606180017
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11606180018

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
G_P_J (2024-02-09 23:26:35+00:00): Poprawione.
Syl (2024-02-14 20:16:07+00:00): J'ai annulé ce groupe de modifications (voir https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/ajouter-le-trace-de-communes-disparues/2111).
Fizzie-DWG (2024-02-10 22:44:08+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15694 & https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15695
NorthCrab_upload (2024-02-09 23:10:18+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/223052849
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/813986028

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
WieKo68 (2024-06-10 19:41:52+00:00): poprawiono
BCNorwich (2024-02-11 10:03:07+00:00): Designations as per definitive map added.
maraf24 (2024-04-01 00:04:10+00:00): Jakie jest źródło tych nazw?
Alanantos (2024-04-01 15:22:05+00:00): https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q1799
maraf24 (2024-04-01 16:34:53+00:00): Czyli nieznane pochodzenie nazw i problem z licencją.
shinylman (2024-02-21 21:40:04+00:00): Hi, thanks for updating the boundary of Florence. I noticed you removed all of the tags from the node that has the role of admin_centre. I'm assuming this was a mistake because that is what allows the place name to show up when zoomed out on the map.
jcarlson (2024-02-22 01:29:00+00:00): you're absolutely right, that wasn't intended. i must have been trying to remove tags from the member ways and selected all members by mistake. it will be corrected shortly, if it hasn't been already.
jcarlson (2024-02-22 01:31:29+00:00): done!
Vivek Dumre (2024-05-10 10:03:58+00:00): Thank you for mapping. The changeset comment and the mapping seems impressive. Keep mapping and contribute to open mapping. Happy mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147277634
NorthCrab_upload (2024-02-10 00:50:21+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/945899911

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
WieKo68 (2024-06-10 19:02:02+00:00): poprawione
gscholz (2024-02-11 06:59:09+00:00): Hi Wamdai Isah Gazama,
your recent edits have left behind several errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=7.41313&lat=10.53779&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=147277893

Can you please fix this?

This kind of result is very typical for JOSM users who just press "o" and do not care about the results. You can apply the internal validator to avoid uploading such errors.

Kind regards
Guido