piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
DD1GJ (2026-01-10 10:56:51+00:00): Hallo Eilischer,

ich hatte Dich bereits vor einem Monat auf Deine schlechte Datenqualität und die Community-Regeln hingewiesen. Außerdem hatte ich Dich gebeten, anzugeben, in wessen Auftrag Du arbeitest. Du scheinst ziemlich beratungsresistent zu sein und hast nun durch erneuten Datenmüll das Fass zum Überlaufen gebracht.

Gib bitte innerhalb einer Woche an, für wen Du arbeitest, incl. offizieller Kontaktmöglichkeit. Entweder in Deinem Profil, hier in der Diskussion oder an meinen OSM-Acoount. 

Ansonsten werde ich übernächste Woche in Muggenturm recherchieren, ob da irgendwas im Zusammenhang mit den Hydranten beauftragt wurde, auf die OSM-Inkompetenz des Auftragnehmers hinweisen und um Unterlassung bitten.

Viele Grüße, Joachim
Elischer (2026-01-11 06:58:43+00:00): Hallo Joachim,
es ist nicht meine Absicht schlechte Daten zu liefern. Ich möchte nur die Posititon der Hydranten in Openfiremap eintragen. Ich arbeite in einer Firma die die GIS Daten der Gde. verwaltet. Im zuge der Erstellung eines Hydrantenplanes machte ich auf die möglichkeit aufmerksam, daß diese in Openfiremap dargestellt werden können. Die Übernahme in Openfiremap erfolgt aus privaten ingteresse, und ich habe die mündlche Freigabe von der Gemeinde. Ich war über 20 Jahre FFW Abeilungskommandate und bin weiterhin Aktives Mitlglied der Feuerwehr als Zug- und Gruppenführer. Ich weiß natürlich, wie wichtig es ist, daß Hydranten mit möglichst allen Infos übernommen werden sollten. Dieses kann ich aber nicht ohne größeren Aufwand bewerkstellen. Ich müßte aus den alten WV Plänen die DN erfassen und entsprechen eintragen. Wie gesagt, ich mache dies in meiner Freizeit und der Aufwand wäre relativ groß. Mein persönliches Interesse ist, daß die Openfiremap möglichst vollständig wird. Ich möchte die genaue Position der Punkte übergen, damit spätere Nutzer die DN und weiter Infos  in den Daten die cm genau sind eränzen können.  Wie bereits erwähnt will ich nur die genau vermessene Position der Hydranten hochladen. Am Freitag abend habe ich mich dem Thema Muggensturm nochmals angenommen und wollte diese nochmals übernehmen. Ich habe bei dem Datensatz geprüft welche Hydranten in Openfiremap bereits vorhanden sind und diese in meinem Datensatz entfernt. Da Du sagst, das die Hydranten doppelt waren, habe ich offensichtlich welche übersehen. Ich bitte dies zu entschuldigen. Außerdem habe ich die Hydraten als "firehydrant possition" deklariert, da ich ja nur die Position übernehmen wollte.  Nun meine Frage, wie soll ich, kann ich die Hydranten nur mit Ihrer Position  übernehmen und welche waren noch doppelt? Ich übergebe die Hyranten normalerweise über Josm. 
Viele Grüße 
Holger
rempshaener (2026-01-11 08:33:02+00:00): Hallo,

ich fange mal an, Joachim kann mich gerne ergänzen bzw. korrigieren.

Ein Import, wie du ihn beschreibst, unterliegt den Import-Regularien bei OSM. Und ich gehe davon aus, dass du für einen solchen „Rumpf-Import“ keine Zustimmung der Community bekommen wirst.

Ich verstehe dich so, dass es dir darum geht, vor allem die (wahrscheinlich äußerst genauen) Positionsdaten zur Verfügung zu stellen.

Als Vorschlag:
- Stelle die Daten der Feuerwehr oder einzelnen Interessierten zur Verfügung, am besten bereits als „leere“ (also taglose) Nodes in einem gängigen Format, das direkt in JOSM geladen werden kann (.osm).
- Die Hydranten bzw. die dazugehörigen Schilder werden georeferenziert fotografiert (z. B. mit Open Camera oder mit dem OSMTracker) und in JOSM geladen.
- Vorhandene Hydranten werden mit den von dir bereitgestellten (ortsgenaueren) Nodes verschmolzen.
- Die übrigen Nodes werden mit den üblichen Daten angereichert.
- Nodes, die nicht (mehr) vorhanden sind, werden gelöscht bzw. mit entsprechenden Lebenszyklus-Präfixen versehen.

Vorteile:
- Kein Import
- aktuelle Daten
- vollständige Daten
- Berücksichtigung vorhandener Daten anderer Mapper
- Einarbeitung Interessierter, die auch künftig die Daten pflegen.

Viele Grüße
DD1GJ (2026-01-11 10:54:23+00:00): Hallo Holger,

danke für die ausführlichen Erklärungen. Das lässt Deine Aktivitäten in einem ganz anderen Zusammenhang erscheinen. Ich melde mich direkt bei Dir für den weiteren Erfahrungs- und Datenaustausch.

Viele Grüße, Joachim
gscholz (2026-01-11 09:15:19+00:00): Hi  Jojolaglandouille,
this changeset has destroyed this meadow relation:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=3.72732&lat=45.53717&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9656463/history#map=17/45.537543/3.724090

I have just fixed this. Please be careful if you edit relations with ID, use JOSM instead.
Kind regards
Guido
NeisBot (2026-01-10 07:29:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/1042793140 v4

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Furniture store in Indianapolis"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-18 10:58:54+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177368249
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2026-01-10 05:20:16+00:00): Merhaba @ABCD0123. (Ya da eski kullanıcı adınızla AliKarabulut1956)

way/392613484 'de okulun adını değiştirmişsiniz. Türkiye'de 2012'den bu yana ilköğretim okulları yok. Artık ilköğretim okulları, ilkokul ve ortaokul şeklinde iki farklı okul. Bazıları aynı binada faaliyet gösteriyor ama iki farklı kurum oldukları için iki öğe şeklinde eklenmeliler. Bkz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element

Tarafınıza geçmişte birden çok kez highway=* ve https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tr:Turkey_roads_tagging Viki sayfalarını göndermiştim. Lütfen okuyunuz.

way/1465654809 ve way/1465654810 'ın etiketleri highway=service olmalıydı. Siz highway=residential ile eklemişsiniz.

İyi günler.
limes11 (2026-01-09 16:50:17+00:00): Hi, 

did you verify in these cases that name is correct and noname=yes is not ? 

That's not self-evident.

Cheers
abs8_josm (2026-01-09 17:04:05+00:00): Hello, in each of these cases the name was added later on but they forgot to omit the noname tag. These two tags are opposites, and hence not compatible so I have removed them.
limes11 (2026-01-09 19:02:26+00:00): This indicates that the person adding the name-tag is rather inexperienced, but it does not guarantee that noname=yes is false. For instance, I am fairly confident, it is correct on this stump:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/706576146/

So, if you have no ways of verifying your change using streetview such as Mapillary, please revert it.
kabelhaai (2026-01-09 19:08:14+00:00): I'm sorry, you're specifying a way with a name tag present. Yet you are proposing to add the (opposite) tag noname=no. If you have knowledge of streetnames being incorrect, please correct them instead of complaining about people cleaning up opposite tags.

Is that piece of the street nameless (noname=yes) or does it carry the name=Lohrbergweg ?
limes11 (2026-01-09 19:20:47+00:00): "I'm sorry, you're specifying a way with a name tag present. Yet you are proposing to add the (opposite) tag noname=no."

?!?! I never spoke of adding noname=no, and of course this way has a name tag. All ways in the changeset do, otherwise we wouldn't have this discussion.

As he is the one performing armchair-mapping it is his obligation to verify the correctness beforehand.
limes11 (2026-01-11 22:41:09+00:00): Due to the lack of answer, I reverted these changes on ways, kept the nodes. 

Again, there *is* something wrong here, but it is not self-evident that your update improves data. Adding a name for an unnamed service road is a rather common beginner's mistake, in particular in combination with keeping the noname=yes-tag. 

These issues should be fixed with on-site knowledge or using streetview.

Best
NeisBot (2026-01-10 07:29:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13416774563 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Tattoo shop in Waukegan IL"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-18 11:22:22+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177369077
NeisBot (2026-01-10 07:29:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13418577324 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Animal control service in Louisville"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-18 11:22:23+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177369078
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2026-01-10 05:34:26+00:00): Merhaba ABCD0123 (eski kullanıcı adınızla AliKarabulut1956). Yola eklediğiniz çit ve kapıyı geri aldım. Sitenin kapısını veya çitini yola değil de sitenin sınırlarına ekleyiniz. Nasıl eklemeniz gerektiği bağlantıda açıklanıyor. Bkz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:barrier#How_to_map_barrier_nodes

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177049603
YomanNH (2026-01-12 18:59:04+00:00): Hej, skąd wziąłeś informację o tej proponowanej drodze pieszo-rowerowej: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1465658906 ?
Czy na pewno jest ona proponowana? Na orto widać już jej zarysy.
A jeśli rzeczywiście jest tylko proponowana, to do usunięcia jest bicycle=designated
i foot=designated, bo nie można się po tym poruszać, skoro to nie istnieje.
d3mol3k (2026-01-12 20:34:38+00:00): Dzięki za zwrócenie uwagi - zmapowane z orto i w związkuz tym że mapuję ze Szczecina - dodawałam uruchomiony odcinkowy pomiar prędkości - poprawiłem kilka linii zgodnie z podkładem a tu omyłkowo dodałem proposed zamiast construction. Nie wiem na ile w tamtym rejonie/miejscu posunięte sa prace drogowe a ten fragment nie był w ogóle zaznaczony. Zmieniłem na construction
YomanNH (2026-01-12 21:13:38+00:00): Construction też nie powinno mieć bicycle=designated i foot=designated, bo to wynika ze znaków, których raczej nie stawia się w trakcie budowy.
Ale podejrzewam, że ta infrastruktura jest już wybudowana i odpowiednio oznakowana, bo powstała w ramach budowy obwodnicy. Utworzę uwagę, żeby ktoś to zweryfikował na miejscu.
d3mol3k (2026-01-12 22:21:00+00:00): Ja dodaję większość znanych mi tagów do highway=proposed - bo kiedy ich nie ma część osób otwiera te drogi i nie dodaje reszty tagów.  Z uwagą super - sam zapomniałem jej tam wstawić kiegy dodawałem #opp
MassCartog (2026-01-09 20:03:01+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM. The feature you removed in this changeset is valid. Please don’t remove valid OSM data.

You have a new account and might not be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground. If it exists on the ground, it is valid data regardless of a feature being public or private, designated or informal/illegal/unauthorized. Removing features that exist is actually considered vandalism.

It's clear that these features still exist on the ground. Not being public access areas is an invalid reason to remove data from OSM. So this edit is incorrect and damaging to valid OSM data.

The correct way to handle this is to use OSM's tagging system. access=private, or access=no would be appropriate if they are closed to the public. Once this is done, services that do use OSM data will reflect that and specify their access.

Please read this for more info:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won't_delete_roads_on_private_property

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2026-01-10 05:49:32+00:00): M1-M2-M3 hatları birleşik olduğu için değişikliğinizi geri aldım. 

Ayrıca lütfen değişiklik açıklamalarına neden değişiklik yaptığınızı yazınız. Bkz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177049786
Rainero (2026-03-21 21:48:49+00:00): Revert mit changeset/180227632
(unzulässige Quelle)
Đuro Jiří (2026-02-14 16:08:18+00:00): What do these changes mean?
DeFra85 (2026-01-14 11:23:20+00:00): Kann es sein, dass du einen Fußweg an der Kirche gelöscht hast? Dadurch wurden Wanderwege unterbrochen!
Mingwei (2026-05-04 03:43:15+00:00): Please be careful with your edits, the California Western Railroad at least is not disused:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Western_Railroad
https://www.skunktrain.com/
Mingwei (2026-05-04 03:52:27+00:00): Oh wait, you were right, my bad
felipeeugenio (2026-01-09 20:11:34+00:00): Hola. La tienda se llama Colon 682? o es una copia de la dirección?

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177035807
Szymson (2026-01-09 17:58:55+00:00): Po co ten multipolygon tutaj?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20064174
Mister_of_America (2026-01-09 18:03:17+00:00): Nie ja go wprowadzałem, a jedynie regulowałem kształt tego miejsca od strony UG.
Szymson (2026-01-09 18:06:27+00:00): Jak nie Ty jak Ty. Jest to wersja pierwsza tego obiektu, czyli Ty go stworzyłeś.
Mister_of_America (2026-01-09 18:41:48+00:00): Edytowałem przed chwilą, więc dobrze wiem, co stwarzałem, a co nie. Obszar gruntów ornych był tu przed moją edycją, możesz to zobaczyć na mapie, bo moje zmiany nawet nie zdążyły się zaczytać. Ja tylko regulowałem jego kształt.
Szymson (2026-01-09 18:48:14+00:00): Przekształciłeś obszar na relację typu multipolygon. Musiałeś coś gdzieś przeciąć, ponownie scalić i dlatego tak się zrobiło. To taka cecha edytora iD.
Szymson (2026-01-09 18:57:50+00:00): Naprawione:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177038084
felipeeugenio (2026-01-09 20:10:50+00:00): Hola. Buenas tardes. por favor no realinear caminos, solo corregir geometrías, si acaso están mal. Pero realinear es todo un tema que podemos explicarle más adelante para no agobiarlo.

Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177035961
NieWnen (2026-01-10 12:02:15+00:00): Cześć,
drobna sugestia.

Jak dodajesz dość szczegółowo lampy jak tutaj: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13443114111

to warto dorzucać jeszcze tag light:count (w tym przypadku z wartością 2).

Super to potem wygląda np. na tej stronie: https://sb12.github.io/OSMStreetLight/#19/52.18412/20.89690

W JOSMie jest również styl (Street lamps), który je wyświetla w edytorze dla wygodniejszej edycji.
BartekGa (2026-01-10 12:04:26+00:00): Cześć!
Dzięki za komentarz, masz rację - warto to dodać dla estetyki i dodatkowych informacji, będę miał na uwadze i wprowadzę.
Seyruun (2026-01-10 09:58:08+00:00): Thank you for fixing my mistakes!
i2004 (2026-01-09 21:06:25+00:00): el 60 puente saavedra sigue funcionando me dijo un chofer
AgusQui (2026-01-10 00:19:04+00:00): Hasta ahora no ví ninguno.
DeFra85 (2026-01-14 11:20:48+00:00): Ahoi. Hast du die Fußwege über den Platz (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/44578915/history) gelöscht?
Da liefen Wanderwege drüber, die jetzt nicht mehr funktionieren
HellMap (2026-01-10 10:41:29+00:00): Hello,

Thanks for you map changes! A few notes.

It's not necessary to specify source on each road/feature. It is enough to specify the sources for the changeset when uploading. In fact, having sources on elements makes it harder to maintain the data long-term, since there would be way too many and they will go out of date quickly.

When drawing roads to individual properties, these should be driveways highway=service + service+driveway not tracks. Tracks are land access roads in forests and meadows and such. While driveways are "final" approach roads that lead to properties. There is some variation and it's often necessary to check the cadaster layer to see what properties roads pass through.

Some of the roads you drew did not connect to the other roads, like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1465690426 , which means they would not work for navigation. Make sure to snap road connection in the editor (there usually is a warning before upload).

I have fixed the above issues.

I should note that a lot of the data on the map, especially in rural areas is old and might not be correctly tagged, so be aware if using it as examples.

Cheers
Elviss Petersons (2026-01-10 12:34:43+00:00): Hi,
Thank you for your comments and guidance, I was using other roads as example, due that I have used wrong tags of my changes. I use several sources of Latvian map (official), however, not always exact information is available for road type even in Latvian register 😅 just road and that is all...
As the map do not show quite many my region/country roads, due that planing and viewing access to delivery points (especially for road optimization like vroom) is hard without those details and I decided to started update data to osm "server", not only locally on private server.
So my apologise if I made new mistakes, let me know and I will correct my mistake and will do my best to improve data.
Greetings,
Elviss
HellMap (2026-01-10 12:46:16+00:00): No worries and it's always good to have more mappers. A lot of data is out of date and even incorrect, so it's always helpful to fix and update it.

P. S. We can switch to Latvian in the future if you prefer.
Elviss Petersons (2026-01-10 13:11:08+00:00): Paldies, Nav nekādu problēmu runāt abās valodās :))
richlv (2026-01-10 19:26:57+00:00): Un noteikti aicinām pievienoties Latvijas OSM kopienas čatam - https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com :)

Drošības labad jāpiebilst - ja izmanto kādas citas kartes, ļoti uzmanīgi. Tikai daļu drīkst legāli izmantot.
Elviss Petersons (2026-01-10 19:38:28+00:00): Paldies par informāciju, jebkurā gadījumā:)
eggie (2026-01-09 19:13:42+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Tip.. Probeer het gebied van je edits veel kleiner te houden. Doe zoiets in twee uploads.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-01-09 19:16:22+00:00): Wanneer een fietsoversteek uitkomt op een weg die op slot staat voor fietsers gaat de oversteek niet lukken. Ik heb het aangepast.
gr eggie
2026ATC (2026-01-09 20:09:13+00:00): Dank voor de tip Eggie. De edit zal ik kleiner houden in het vervolg.
eggie (2026-01-09 20:21:24+00:00): 👍
Baloo Uriza (2026-01-13 14:30:07+00:00): Looks like this got added on someone's grave.  Do you have a picture or description of where the camera is located, so its position on the map can be updated?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177037659
NeisBot (2026-01-09 18:47:22+00:00): Hi Gepardzisko, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 97% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 8 highway(s)
- 1 landuse(s)
- 1 name(s)
- 2 natural(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177037688
pitscheplatsch (2026-01-09 19:01:12+00:00): Thank you for your map edits.
Looks good!

Best regards,
Pascal
Gepardzisko (2026-01-09 19:30:53+00:00): All changes added before me were made correctly.
Yog Sot (2026-01-09 23:52:17+00:00): koniec z Saharą tak na amen amenów?
Gepardzisko (2026-01-09 23:56:23+00:00): Tak, już jest nowy plan zagospodarowania terenu pod przemysł i usługi magazynowe.
NeisBot (2026-01-10 07:28:27+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 30 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/124210908 v3 | 17 crossings
https://osm.org/way/124210904 v4 | 13 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/1383138305 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177037994
leojth (2026-01-11 13:39:18+00:00): Reverted node move in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177096409
sembelst134 (2026-02-11 23:44:15+00:00): Das ist kein Blitzer, sondern eine LKW Zollkontrollstation und außerdem geschlossener Ortschaft.
Also entweder korregieren oder löschen.
arjunaraoc (2026-01-18 10:03:33+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check my update https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177365982#map=15/17.83038/83.08339
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177038184
eggie (2026-01-09 19:18:32+00:00): De adresnode en de manege heb ik verwijderd. Het gebouw had je zelf gewist.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-01-09 19:23:08+00:00): Tip....  Brandgangen geven we de tag footway=alley mee. 

MVG
eggie
juni_vv (2026-01-09 19:26:52+00:00): aahh top ga ik aanpassen,
dank voor de feedback!

mvg,
juniper
eggie (2026-01-09 19:26:51+00:00): Commentaar : Verbeteren gebied

Dat proberen we altijd. Probeer concreet aan te geven wat je hebt gedaan. Bv .. reshaped residential.
Mapse,
eggie
2026ATC (2026-01-09 20:10:32+00:00): Dank voor de feedback. Dit ging inderdaad om twee woongebieden die tegen elkaar aan getekend waren die ik heb aangepast in een grote.
kubahahaha (2026-01-10 17:02:28+00:00): Ostatnia edycja była z komentarzem

"To nie jest jeszcze ekspresówka, znaki w terenie są przekreślone."

Już odsłonili znaki?
NeisBot (2026-01-10 07:28:30+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 7 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/867494740 v1 | 7 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/8085900410 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177039127