piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2023-02-18 12:44:34+00:00): 
Hello. Thanks for mapping on this difficult task.
Mapping of tall (high) buildings.  

Mapping of tall buildings differs from standard buildings. Because the imagery is taken at an angle, you see both the rooflines and also the side of a building. 
How do you map such a building?
Map over the rooflines and lastly slide the mapped building to the footprint.
Here is a video how that is done.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1V5-bADsYiffCD9bo6l64YOdTvmKqMGry/view?usp=share_link
Unfortunately, you have mapped many buildings where the side is also enclosed. These buildings should be re-mapped. Sorry, modifying each building is more time consuming than re-mapping.
And.... don't forget to square each rectangular building.

Best regards and keep mapping
MxxCon (2023-02-16 02:51:25+00:00): Hello.
Please note that this feature is already mapped in OSM. The fact that you mapped it again goes against https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element guideline. As such this edit is going to be reverted.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132546580
yop_tup (2023-08-22 06:33:15+00:00): Buenos días.
Creo que estoy en el conjunto de cambios correctos. He visto que has cambiado el nombre de Laujar de Andarax a Láujar de Andarax el cual es incorrecto. El nombre es sin acento, un saludo.
kapazao (2023-08-24 06:56:56+00:00): Hola, en el nomenclátor del Instituto Nacional de Estadística aparece con acento y este es el nombre que debería tener. Si localmente se le llama sin acento esto debería indicarse en loc_name.
Un saludo
yop_tup (2023-08-24 08:23:45+00:00): No sabía que había que ponerlo según el instituto Nacional de estadística. Igualmente ningún cartel te lo encontrarás con acento, podría ir al ayuntamiento a preguntar.
Un saludo
kapazao (2023-08-24 12:57:22+00:00): Bueno yo a los carteles no les haría mucho caso jajaja, se ven a veces cosas antiguas y alguna burrada.
En la misma página del ayuntamiento verás que en unos sitios aparece la tilde y en otros no. Suele haber esos problemas sobre todo por no conocer cómo se escribe correctamente. Ya he visto casos así y he tratado de corregirlo sobre todo en Wikipedia, que en este caso está sin acento y habría que corregirlo si oficialmente es con acento.
Un saludo
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-14 17:40:34+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10658454589
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1091953632
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1091953635
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1091953640
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1091953641
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1091953654
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1091953678
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1091953687
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1091953693
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1091953696
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1091953701
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1091953702
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1091953709
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1091953718
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1091953721
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1091953910

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Tjuro_Global (2023-02-18 07:36:46+00:00): Hello,

I see that you have added some landuse=village_green. Please read:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dvillage_green
Would a more specific tag like grass or shrubbery be more appropriate?

Greetings Tjuro
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-14 17:50:34+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10658486991
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/885937387
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/885937420
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/885937424
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/885937554
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/885937562
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/885937600
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/885937730
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/885937836
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/885937837
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/885937843
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/885937870
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/885937906
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/885937919
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/885937975
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/885937977
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/885937996
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/885938015
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/885938064
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/885938075
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/885938083
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/885938120
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/885938127
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1145223614

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
mavl (2023-02-15 04:37:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 132563159 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6861].
Frans S (2023-02-19 09:07:20+00:00): 
Hello. Thanks for mapping on this difficult task.
About mapping of tall (high) buildings.  

Mapping of tall buildings differs from standard buildings. Because the imagery is taken at an angle, you see both the roof lines and also the side of a building. 
How do you map such a building?
Map over the roof lines and lastly slide the mapped building to the footprint.
Here is a video how that is done.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1V5-bADsYiffCD9bo6l64YOdTvmKqMGry/view?usp=share_link

And.... don't forget to square each rectangular building.

Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2023-02-15 17:56:32+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
Another mapper mapped residential areas here long time ago.
Now lots of buildings are mapped and crosses these lines. Please move the residential area nodes a bit aside so that they don't cross buildings. Best regards
Frans S (2023-02-15 18:08:36+00:00): Hello again/ Please square each rectangular building with the Q key.
Thanks and keep mapping
HirschKauz (2023-02-14 19:28:43+00:00): Hi Marktrix, 
kleiner Tipp wenn Du ein Gebäude gezeichnet hast: Wähle das Gebäude an und tippe auf "Q" und schon ist das Gebäude qadratisch ;-)
Viel Spaß weiterhin
MxxCon (2023-02-16 04:01:37+00:00): Hello.
Please note that this feature is already mapped in OSM. The fact that you mapped it again goes against https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element guideline. As such this edit is going to be reverted.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132548909
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-14 18:20:53+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10658590838
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10658590843
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10658590849
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10658590854
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/657269434
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/657269436
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/657269441
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/657269446
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/657269451
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/657269453
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/680785000
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/680785003
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/681200286
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/681200455
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/681622920
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1049116969
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1049116971
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1049116981
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1145238846
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1145238850
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1145238853

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
ivanbranco (2023-02-14 21:45:47+00:00): Ciao pboscherini,

ho visto che stai aggiungendo i cartelli dei nomi delle vie come information=guidepost, ma questi tag vanno utilizzati per i cartelli segnavia dei percorsi escursionistici: ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:information=guidepost ).

un possibile tagging potrebbe essere traffic_sign=IT:Nome strada + support=pole (se su palo)

ho notato poi che continui a usare i tag wiki in modo errato: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10655546150
qua per esempio hai usato wikipedia=it:Italgas, ma andrebbe usato sull'elemento che rappresenta l'azienda, non sul tombino. Se ci fosse una pagina wikipedia dedicata al tombino si potrebbe aggiungere. In questo caso probabilmente dovrebbe essere operator:wikipedia=it:Italgas

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10655460090
uguale qua, la pagina wikipedia parla del parco nella sua interezza, non del singolo cartello. Se vuoi indicare che è l'argomento del pannello una possibilità è subject:wikipedia=*

spero di esserti stato utile, buon mapping
pboscherini (2023-02-14 23:03:46+00:00): Ciao 'Commento di ivanbranco circa 1 ora fa',

pianifico le migliorie già da domani.
Grazie,
Piergiorgio.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-06-18 05:51:53+00:00): Chcę się pochwalić że napisałem mejla o tym głupim oznakowaniu i poprawili :)

Więc jak trafisz na podobnego bubla to zachęcam by nie tylko note= napisać ale i mejla.


=========================

Attachment: 1757538057305.jpg
From: Mateusz Konieczny
To: rowery@zdmk.krakow.pl
Subject: Czemu wybudowana droga dla rowerów nie jest oznakowana jako droga dla rowerów (przy Giedroycia od strony południowej)
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2025 23:03:05 +0200

odcinek został utwardzony (asfalt + kostka brukowa), ale oznakowanie jako
droga dla rowerów nie obejmuje tego odcinka
YomanNH (2026-06-18 06:01:32+00:00): Wspaniale :) Czasem coś zgłaszam, ale rzadko.
MissMarcoPolo (2023-02-15 23:46:35+00:00): Correction: Source used was Maxar Premium Imagery.
tomhukins (2025-02-13 19:41:49+00:00): This change adds two separate features for Lees Brook Mill so in the spirit of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element I have merged them in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162478933
Frans S (2023-03-09 15:43:08+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
Only roads and buildings need to be mapped. Please no other features .
Buildings not always squared.
Connected nodes to other features.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132550146
CACO123 (2023-02-19 22:00:47+00:00): This removed correct information. It was not vandalism. It has been restored.
ivanbranco (2023-02-15 10:43:35+00:00): Hi Lemetiou,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1145311702

I think these tags should be deleted (also, can we import this data to OSM?).
Lemetiou (2023-02-15 13:13:25+00:00): Thanks for the catch! Agree, I've removed them. As for the data rights, they're licensed as CC0 and have an explicit declaration waiving copyright to the data (http://maps.co.mecklenburg.nc.us/openmapping/about.html).
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-18 07:50:19+00:00): Is there a reason you added duplicate cartpaths in some areas?

The duplicates have been deleted.

Descriptive names have also been removed.
mavl (2023-02-15 04:37:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 132563159 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6861].
checht (2023-02-14 19:15:20+00:00): Accidental
checht (2023-02-14 19:17:01+00:00): Please disregard these changes
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-14 19:20:25+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/130297785
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/427825231

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
MxxCon (2023-02-16 04:05:07+00:00): Hello.
If you are going to map sidewalks, please draw them to the full length of the block. Do not stop in the middle of the block since that's not accurate to what's on the ground.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132551418
Layft Greater (2024-09-09 12:43:01+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5153781171

It is actually Euronet brand. "not:brand:wikidata" is erroneous here. Now corrected.
mavl (2023-02-15 04:37:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 132563159 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6861].
VictorIE (2023-03-10 06:24:04+00:00): Untagged multipolygon https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2643835
Frans S (2023-03-03 17:30:11+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are often partly covered by trees.
Please extrapolate the rooflines rather than mapping the tree lines.

square each rectangular building.
Don't connect nodes of buildings to other buildings or features



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132552507
aphase (2023-08-03 08:55:52+00:00): Hier scheint es zeitlich Überschneidungen mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132597574 gegeben zu haben, so dass in der Gegend um den Gerberbruch Doppelungen gibt, z.B. Brücken übereinander.
da-sch (2023-08-03 12:11:20+00:00): Gerberbruch korrigiert. !i! hat wohl mit einer gespeicherten Version gearbeitet, da einen Tag nach mir die Bearbeitung erfolgte. Sollte nun stimmen.
Frans S (2023-02-16 12:18:51+00:00): Hello,  Thanks for mapping on this project. 
Please square each rectangular building with the Q key.
Best regards
AntMadeira (2023-02-27 21:10:20+00:00): Olá, Georg_M_Weber.
Por favor, não adiciones áreas residenciais a povoações grandes, como é este caso de Alvaiázere. 
Além de não ser possível verificar estes limites que adicionaste, uma área residencial nunca deve englobar uma povoação que tem outro tipo de áreas.

Posto isto, irei eliminar a área que adicionaste.

Cumprimentos,
António Madeira.
MxxCon (2023-02-16 04:05:38+00:00): Hello.
Please note that these features are already mapped in OSM. The fact that you mapped it again goes against https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element guideline. As such this edit is going to be reverted.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132552758
Leo Slager (2023-02-14 23:22:34+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
mawutor (2023-02-15 04:24:50+00:00): Thank you for the great contributions please not this: when adding change-set comments you do not need to separate the hashtags with commas, and also leave some brief comment about what you did. check me example below:

Added buildings in Türkiye #hotosm-project-14232 #TürkiyeEQ060223 #Syria #AKDN #OMHAP #LoveMaps  #28for28 #YMUNZA

you may refer this link about good change-set coments. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Thank you once again and happy mappy
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132553187
MxxCon (2023-02-16 04:06:46+00:00): Hello.
When mapping sidewalks, please pay attention that they do not cross buildings since that's not accurate to what's on the ground.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132553272
Shaun das Schaf (2023-02-16 09:59:59+00:00): Hallo DoppelKomma,

gilt hier
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1145419632
wirklich eine Einbahnstraßenregelung, also darf nur gegen den Uhrzeigersinn um diesen Baum herum gefahren werden?
Bei den anderen Schleifen in diesem Gebiet scheint es nämlich nicht der Fall zu sein und für einen verkehrsberuhigten Bereich wäre es auch sehr unüblich.

Viele Grüße
Shaun das Schaf
Frans S (2023-02-15 13:10:12+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
I have comments about tagging service roads.
Please follow the rules on this wiki, when and how to tag service roads.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highways
Most of your taggings could be better tagged as residential.
Best regards
Frans S (2023-02-15 14:44:14+00:00): Hello Bruno,
Please do not include the shadow of a building into the mapping and follow the rooflines accurate. When you map a high building, (you see a large shadow and the siding of the building), just map over the roofline and move the whole building to the footprint.
Best regards
Frans S (2023-02-15 18:12:46+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping. 
Please do not tag traces in urban areas as track. See the wiki highways when and how  to tag roads.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highways

Best regards
alessandrocarmeli (2023-02-22 16:14:32+00:00): Le via romagna e via ovidio non le vedo terziarie, a mio parere. Forse meglio indicarle come minori n/c
Frans S (2023-03-06 15:49:55+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this task.
Please read the info about mapping of tracks in the instructions.
Best regards
Frans S (2023-02-15 17:46:30+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
Your mappings are rather accurate, however not always squared. Please square each rectangular building with the Q key

Best regards
clay_c (2023-03-10 05:18:29+00:00): Hi LongBeach2,

Thanks for your contribution. Unfortunately I've had to revert it, because it introduced errors in the multipolygon for the Addicks Reservoir, making it disappear from the map. Moreover, the individual park areas within the Addicks Reservoir are not excluded from the reservoir—the parks flood if the basin floods.

Reverted here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133503115
kwiatek_123 (2023-02-22 20:40:12+00:00): Hej, zerknij proszę https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3568248
Piotr Strębski (2023-02-23 07:35:04+00:00): Hej, dzięki, poprawiłem!
fs_LT (2026-01-30 06:23:55+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1145433640
Was soll das für eine Skitour sein? Von wo nach wo?
fs_LT (2026-01-30 06:26:35+00:00): ... und diese hier? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1138005723
Hungerburg (2023-02-17 01:29:43+00:00): Als ich zuletzt dort vorbei kam war da nur eine Wiese und kein Pfad. Sicher sind irgendwelche Leute auf den Hexenhügel hinauf, aber nicht so, dass da etwas getrampeltes sichtbar geworden wäre.
IlBano (2023-02-19 16:22:10+00:00): Ciao ALn_668.
Ho visto che hai editato parte della carreggiata chiusa della Casilina per consentire l'accesso da Via Olivetti.
Se conosci la zona, come penso, hai modo di correggere anche l'accesso da/per Via della Sanguinara ? Al momento non risulta infatti "raggiungibile".
Se poi questi tratti fossero pure chiusi al traffico in modo definitivo forse non avrebbe neanche senso che rimangano primary.

Grazie

IlBano
ALn_668 (2023-03-01 16:37:30+00:00): Ciao! Grazie per avermelo fatto notare, ho sistemato nel changeset #133179406 con quella che dovrebbe essere la situazione attuale, verifico anche sul posto appena possibile. Concordo sul fatto che i tratti chiusi al traffico non debbano essere "primary" in questo caso, visto che di fatto la Via Casilina è ormai solamente sulla carreggiata aperta.
eggie (2023-02-18 20:40:59+00:00): Dag nieki.. Je vraagt feedback. Lijkt me oke als je daar alleen mag wandelen... 

MVG
eggie
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-14 21:30:25+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8844891519
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1145439195

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
mueschel (2023-02-18 09:59:17+00:00): Hi,
you added four ways with a huge amount of foreign tags like this one:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1145441033

Please have a look.
MxxCon (2023-02-16 04:51:23+00:00): Hello.
Please note that these features are already mapped in OSM. The fact that you mapped it again goes against https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element guideline. As such this edit is going to be reverted.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132555791
nickvet419 (2023-03-18 11:20:18+00:00): looks like you removed a bunch of indoor mapping features. removing rooms and pathways.
nickvet419 (2023-03-18 11:46:59+00:00): If your going to edit an area that has indoor map features, you should use an indoor mapping editor.
Necessarycoot72 (2023-03-18 17:40:47+00:00): what I noticed is that alot of the rooms didnt fit the layout of the building. if I recall correctly alot of the rooms even stuck out of the building area it self.
Frans S (2023-03-09 17:34:38+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, during the validation process.

I noticed that you are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.

We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. Just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.

Please map each building accurate over the rooflines.

Square each rectangular building with the Q key.

Nodes of buildings may NOT  connect to other buildings or features.

The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 

Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.


See also this documenthttps://drive.google.com/file/d/11PsAW0bzUZHbS8YnbaFzqOYhJY7tSPYG/view?usp=share_link


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132555901