piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2023-12-18 10:26:52+00:00): Bij een privepad dat is afgesloten en voorzien van een hek en/of bordje art 461 taggen we access=private. Dus niet no.
Kijk je nog even.
MVG
eggie
Hallie Masseba (2023-12-18 13:30:10+00:00): Ja ik kwam inmiddels ook de optie private tegen. Die zal ik gebruiken i.p.v. no
tux67 (2023-12-18 16:50:13+00:00): Hi neverblink,
what is the source of your information?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments#How_should_I_write_Changeset_Comments?
your editor (iD) automatically added "NRW Liegenschaftskataster", where i can not see a Housenumber for this place (and updates for this source are anyway currently "on hold".)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Verifiability
BR
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145245467
neverblink (2023-12-18 17:03:11+00:00): Hi tux67, I live there :)
(just used the online editor - sorry if there's some mistake)
br, neverblink
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145245467
tux67 (2023-12-18 17:19:14+00:00): Ok, kein Problem. Dann wäre es in Zukunft gut als 'source' beim upload so was wie 'survey' oder 'own knowledge' anzugeben. Das erleichtert die nachvollziehbarkeit für andere Mapper

Gruß tux67
eggie (2023-12-18 10:37:36+00:00): Hier was path correct.
footway is een officieel openbaar wandelpad. 
path hoeft dus niet fout te zijn.
Dit is Beth Chaim en dus geen openbaren weg. 
Svp niet alles highway=path gaan omtaggen naar footway. 
MVG
eggie
Hallie Masseba (2023-12-18 13:31:24+00:00): Okay, ik ga deze serie aanpassen naar path/no bicycles
SKald (2023-12-18 14:34:42+00:00): Bitte die Wegnamen (v.a. von Wegen, die keinen Namen haben!) nicht an die basemap.at anpassen!
Die basemap schreibt aus historischen Gründen ("zur Orientierung") an namenlose Wege die Ortsnamen. Das sind aber nicht die Strassennamen.
Siehe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Austria#Stra%C3%9Fennamen

LG,
Stefan
wejoe (2023-12-18 16:34:04+00:00): Hallo Stefan,
Ich hab mich bisher an deine vorgeschlagene Vorgangsweise gehalten. Habe jedoch oft die Erfahrung gemacht, dass solche Bezeichnungen in weiträumigen Streusiedlungen Sinn machen "würden". (wo weit und breit kein Ort ist) Aber ok, ich akzeptiere die offizielle Linie und werde mich wieder entsprechend verhalten.
Lg. Joe
SKald (2023-12-18 17:19:57+00:00): Dort sind ja (hoffentlich) die richtigen Adressen auf den jeweiligen Gebäuden, wenn der place-node zu weit weg ist.
Danke jedenfalls für die schnelle Antwort.

lg,
Stefan
willkmis (2023-12-18 18:19:25+00:00): Hi, what source are you using to find that this road has two lanes? I just removed the lanes=* value because based on a survey there were no lane markings at all, which appears to be corroborated by the latest aerials (Bing) and Streetside.

Best,
Will
kmarkish_lyft (2023-12-19 13:42:53+00:00): Hi, Will!
My name is Kate, and I’m a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. 
I agree with your point of view that there are no usual lane markings, but according to OSM wiki page - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lanes it is not forbidden to add lanes tag in cases without lanes making, but the best practice will be added the tag ‘lane_markings=no ‘instead of removing the lanes tag.

While making changes I relied on the Lyft-owned images that were taken from Club View Drive in Dec,2023 (34°3′52″N, 118°25′22″W-https://drive.google.com/file/d/1t67VzDW7O4ppHS6S4cN78ic0t56aZ2ii/view?usp=sharing) with indirect new road markings ‘Ahead Stop’ and ‘Stop/Bumps’ in other place (34°3′54″N, 118°25′24″W - https://drive.google.com/file/d/1bKHHK7dUh7SrBq8GB2-lqxTHpgOuAg6b/view?usp=drive_link), also the road surface has recently been changed on this street and perhaps the road markings will be applied soon. Therefore, this all indicates that tag  ‘lanes=2’  for this road is logical information, and it would be better not to remove it.

Regards, Kate
willkmis (2024-01-01 17:59:53+00:00): Hi Kate,
Thanks for responding. I started a thread on the OSMUS Slack asking for opinions on this change: https://osmus.slack.com/archives/C2VJAJCS0/p1703005593240569. The consensus among US mappers in that forum agreed with your assessment that lanes=2 is OK in this situation if paired with lane_markings=no, also agreeing with the guidance you pointed out on the wiki. In light of that, I drop my opposition to you adding lanes=2 to roads similar to this, but ask that in future similar changes you add lane_markings=no as well to more explicitly characterize the situation.

As an aside, at least in this area, the department of transportation tends to add such markings all at once, or at least within a couple weeks of eachother. Given the imagery is more than a year old at this point, I doubt lane dividers will be added in the future.

Happy mapping and happy new year,
Will
A_Prokopova_lyft (2024-01-03 12:31:57+00:00): Hi Will, Happy New Year!

My name is Anastasia, and I'm Kate’s teammate. Thank you for raising this question in the OSM Slack. It is very useful to know more opinions from the OSM community members about it.

You’re right; it would be more accurate to add lane_markings=no tag in cases when there are no lane markings but the number of lanes is obvious.

Best regards!
Geo-Tobi (2024-04-04 17:25:18+00:00): Ist da ein Tippfehler im Namen oder heißt das wirklich so?
Geo-Tobi (2024-04-04 17:25:36+00:00): Ich beziehe mich auf "Elektohaus"
sokolgeo (2024-04-05 14:58:06+00:00): es war aktuelle Name
Geo-Tobi (2024-04-05 18:27:41+00:00): Wirklich? Elektohaus? Nicht Elektrohaus?
sokolgeo (2024-04-06 09:21:42+00:00): Ja, spellink war velleight falsh, sorry
user_3022894 (2024-11-16 16:37:21+00:00): Hallo Lars,

du hattest hier (mglw. aus Versehen) den zweiten Zugangsweg von Süden aus, der zu diesem Aufzug führt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2911721811/ gelöscht.

Der Aufzug hat im Süden zwei Ein-/Ausgänge, einen auf Level 1 und einen auf Level 2. 

Ich habe das eben korrigiert, wollte dir da nur Bescheid geben.

LG Lukas
leofranz (2023-12-21 11:46:42+00:00): Hallo Victor Hugo MM,
kannst du dir bitte noch einmal diese Änderung anschauen? Was wolltest du denn da eintragen?
Leider gibt es in letzter Zeit einige fehlerhafte Änderungen die alle mit der App "Organic Maps" (Nachfolger von maps.me) erstellt wurden. Daher glaube ich nicht, dass du das bewusst so eintragen wolltest. Schöne Grüße, Leo
NorthCrab_upload (2023-12-18 11:10:23+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1232148511

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eggie (2023-12-18 11:22:32+00:00): No need to tag bicycle no on a footway. That's default.
Greetz
eggie
Hallie Masseba (2023-12-18 12:46:47+00:00): Thank you. So footpath is automatically not meant for bicycles?

Greetz Hallie
eggie (2023-12-18 12:52:18+00:00): Yep...  bicycle=no is default.
Het zal nooit routeren voor fietsers. 

Bij een highway=path is het wel noodzakelijk om bicycle=no (of yes voor de duidelijkeheid) toe te voegen. 
Bij een highway=path is dus bicycle=yes de default. 
gr eggie
TrickyFoxy (2024-05-06 09:58:57+00:00): Ну в shop= же название добавлять)
TrickyFoxy (2024-05-06 09:59:48+00:00): И название сомнительное, потому что рядом есть ювелирный с тем же именем. Вернул как было
Allison P (2023-12-19 04:09:59+00:00): I am generally not familiar with bus feature tagging, but this feature has been changed from service to busway and now you've changed it back. I suggest talking to archpdx https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135602745
Supaplex (2023-12-22 01:01:42+00:00): 可以用not:name放因為匯入關係採用的名稱
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:not:name
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145247493
paulbrunner (2024-01-17 22:32:49+00:00): Hi Ansgar,

thanks for your contribution to OpenStreetMap. A quick question about the two gates you mapped (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11428755689 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11428749785):
From the "access = no" tag I understand that this gate is closed, is this correct? In the fixme tag you wrote "Opening Hours?", does that mean you expect the gate to be open sometimes but it wasn't clear when?

Thanks again and happy mapping,
Paul
Ansgar77 (2024-01-18 09:52:25+00:00): Hi!
Yes your Interpretation is correct. Unless the fact that these gates are useless because you can go other ways in the park without gates to both sides of the gates mentioned above there is a garden Center inside the park with opening hours from 8:00 to 13:00. I suggest that in this period the gates are open, but I’m not sure!
kapazao (2023-12-29 21:24:05+00:00): Hola, vuelvo a pasarte el enlace a la wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=motorway_link) donde se explica cómo se editan los enlaces de carretera, ya que parece que se te ha olvidado después de 3 años o más desde que se te explicó (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/93700941).
Por favor no cambies más clasificación de carreteras y enlaces sin comentar bien las causas y preferiblemente edita en zonas que conozcas y no por toda España, donde otros tratamos de mantener las cosas y tú vienes sin conocimiento a cambiarlas incorrectamente.
Un saludo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145248159
AntMadeira (2023-12-18 17:23:16+00:00): Olá, luismbo.
O que é ao certo uma "Estrutura Ecológica Municipal"?

Cumprimentos,
António.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145248474
luismbo (2023-12-19 11:10:36+00:00): Olá. Uma definição de EEM está aqui: https://www.forumdascidades.pt/content/estrutura-ecologica-municipal
AntMadeira (2023-12-19 18:54:52+00:00): Bom, fiquei na mesma. :)

Uma coisa é certa, não é um parque natural. Um parque natural obedece a parâmetros bem definidos no OSM, que não se referem ao que existe neste local (que tampouco é um parque natural).
Aconselho-te a entrar no canal Telegram da comunidade portuguesa [1] para poderes lançar o debate de modo a podermos chegar a uma decisão de como mapear estas áreas, e onde também podes aprender sobre este e outros tipos de mapeamento no OSM.

[1] https://t.me/OSMPortugal

Fica o convite.

Cumprimentos,
António.
luismbo (2023-12-21 21:14:49+00:00): Vou reverter esta alteração e investigar a melhor maneira de mapear solo rural.
Константин Гам (2024-02-13 16:06:11+00:00): Вы вносите недостоверные данные! Строительства здесь не ведёться, следов дорог почти нет, они "уничтожены природой".
PulisakZ (2024-02-14 14:30:29+00:00): Thank you for updating. 

I have sent you message 2 months ago how to correctly tag these ways. 
Glad to resolved this. 
Thank you! 

Best regards.
gileri (2023-12-23 11:59:02+00:00): Bonjour Kevc2003,

Merci pour ces contributions sur les tramways, ces informations techniques font toute la différence d'OpenStreetMap !

Lors de la sauvegarde tu as eu des avertissements de l'éditeur iD, qui prévenait que des routes modifiées se croisaient suite à tes modifications.

Ces avertissements sont généralement signe d'un souci, et souvent avec l'éditeur iD il s'agit de fusion accidentelle de nœuds, ou de déplacement de voies.

On peut avoir une idée de ce qu'il s'est passé avec Achavi par exemple : https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=145249259

J'ai corrigé l'avenue Leclerc dans ce changeset :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145434770

Bonnes fêtes
Kevc2003 (2023-12-28 14:06:39+00:00): Bonjour, je te remercie pour ce commentaire,

C'est vrai que je ne fait que des modifications de "surface", je ne suis pas encore très à l'aise avec les différents problèmes à régler/erreurs à éviter.

En tout cas, merci de ta correction :)
StephaneP (2024-02-26 16:46:09+00:00): Hello,

J'ai vu que tu as déplacé le point de connexion des bretelles de sorties/accélération. Il ne faut pas, ils doivent être à l'endroit où on ne peut plus changer de voie. Ce qui se passe en amont ou en aval est géré avec les tags turn:lanes

exemple sur ce point dont j'ai restauré l'ancienne position : https://www.osm.org/node/249103942

A+
Stf
SHARCRASH (2024-01-23 20:58:08+00:00): Bonsoir Bernard, tu parles d'un track grade4 que j'ai ajouté il y a cinq ans et ce en plein hiver lorsqu'il y a beaucoup moins d'activité... Un grade 4 peut très vite être renaturalisé...

J’apprécierai que tu fasses une analyse plus profonde et pertinente avant de faire de tels commentaires, s'il te pait... Quelqu'un vient de l'utiliser pour essayer de me discréditer. Tu sais de qui je parle, nous en avons parlé face à face chez toi. 

Je pensais que j'avais été clair sur mes contributions et à chaque fois j'ai pu te prouver leur existence alors que tu es passé à coté.
arjunaraoc (2023-12-29 05:06:51+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).

Check my update https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145645816
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145249914
michaelg_at (2023-12-29 10:00:34+00:00): Die Straße hat ein Ausgeschildertes Fahrverbot, ist am ende von leere Blumenkübel blockiert, und ist baulich zu dünn für Autoverkehr.

Derzeit stehen in den osm daten keinerlei dieser Fakten drinnen, Ich fand highway=footway eigentlich eine ziemlich gute Beschreibung.

PS: "Details Völs" ist kein https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
Jens Klein (2024-01-03 13:30:05+00:00): Ok, ich schau mir das mal demnächst selber an. Mein Sohn meinte das sei kein Fussweg, der fährt da jeden Tag mit dem Radl zur Schule durch.
Aber anscheinend gibt es da auch einen Konflikt mit dem Eigentümern bezüglich Servitut mit der Gemeinde, mal schaun, ob ich da was rausfinde.
Dr Kludge (2024-01-13 03:11:35+00:00): I am wondering if you are a local mapper or not?  You have changed this transit system's way of marking bus stations.  That is how it works here.
emersonveenstra (2024-01-13 12:49:36+00:00): I'm not, but I've been working through a lot of the tagging issues in AZ recently. Could you elaborate more? It's been a few weeks, but I remember that the ones I removed did not meet the criteria for amenity=bus_station because they did not "consist of several bus stops, usually allowing people to travel in many different directions." (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dbus_station), they were only 1 or 2 stops on the same route(s). I double checked the wiki pages for AZ, Maricopa, and Phoenix and did not see anything about exemptions to that definition, so I fixed a few of them
kimo (2024-09-07 23:44:44+00:00): Most of these natural=wood areas are a single tree, and should instead be a single node tagged as natural=tree.
blackboxlogic (2023-12-18 16:15:35+00:00): Thanks for adding this path.

It gets complicated for humans who make future edits when unrelated elements are physically connected. You connected your path to the edge of the river in 7ish places.

As an example, the edge of the river seems to be a little mis-aligned. Imagine if I fixed the river edge and now I'm accidentally moving your path around.

I'm telling you this mostly to keep in mind in case you do a lot more editing, which I hope you do.

Please ask if you have questions, and welcome to OSM.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145250551
arjunaraoc (2023-12-18 14:10:58+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check my update https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145253028 .
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145251603
Supaplex (2023-12-19 00:08:03+00:00): 網路戲謔，但現實並存在的事務請不要加上去。OpenStreetMap是有不少服務仰賴的地圖資訊，需要謹慎非主觀方式經手圖資
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145251756
Allison P (2023-12-19 04:05:27+00:00): The road is meant to be disconnected. It was cut off due to construction but the rest of the road remains. Please revert this changeset
Natasha_Zhovner (2023-12-19 09:27:58+00:00): Good afternoon! Thanks for the explanation. I reverted changeset. link to new changeset- https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145283074
Pikse (2024-02-22 21:55:53+00:00): Once again you do the opposite of what write in changeset description. Instead of correcting the border you mess it up so that it longer matches the source given in source=* tag. Border segment way/592082053 in particular does not follow the stream.

Please make changes to any administrative boundaries *only* based on reliable sources and never based on hunch.

Also please note that country borders are not expected to have names like "Latvija — Eesti" that you added earlier to these border segments. These names have been removed by DWG already before as you can see from object histories.
Pikse (2024-02-22 21:58:33+00:00): I meant to write "so that it no longer matches the source given in source=* tag.".
Jay May (2024-02-23 07:21:33+00:00): Hello to you too.
1) What do you mean by "once again"? Where did you see me messing up borders? ...
2) Why would the DWG remove "Latvija — Eesti" if it is pretty logical to have a bilingual name=* tag in such a case?
Pikse (2024-02-23 08:34:28+00:00): I'm referring to at least three cases where you have edited Estonian border to deviate from the official border in the past:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62084029
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102637842
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48708810

For reference, here is the actual country border in this location:
https://xgis.maaamet.ee/xgis2/page/link/sQ3uyUO
And here is the object history showing your "shaping" work, and also the DWG action from 2014:
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/129854854

I don't know the exact reason behind the DWG action but most likely this is due to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
"Latvija — Eesti" isn't a name of any kind, and also "left:county" and "right:county" already store this information in more clear manner.
literan (2023-12-18 17:31:13+00:00): нет такого города "Химки город"
gscholz (2023-12-21 08:15:08+00:00): Hi SUMAYYA 23,
your recent edits have left behind several errors regarding duplicate nodes, self intersecting lines and missing building tags:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=30.62740&lat=-2.62128&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=145252749

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
tastrax (2023-12-19 10:40:49+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
KoiAndBlueBird (2023-12-21 03:24:11+00:00): Please, delete this fire hydrant from the 0,0 coordinates.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-12-18 14:20:26+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5072205164

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
rskedgell (2024-03-07 10:51:11+00:00): What was your source for the pedestrian prohibitions on H3 and other roads? Are these legal restrictions explicitly signed with a "pedestrians prohibited" traffic sign (TSRGD diagram 625.1) and a traffic order, or a feeling that pedestrians probably shouldn't use these roads (even though they usually have verges)?
StC (2024-01-01 16:47:06+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changeset a cassé la Via Gallia Belgica, je m'occupe de la restaurer.
Mathias_ADAV (2024-01-09 13:11:34+00:00): Bonjour, oups, vraiment désolé d'avoir provoqué une erreur sur cet itinéraire. Est-ce bon finalement ? Je vais voir pour continuer l'implantation de ce réseau point nœud. La dimension transfrontalière n'est évidente..!
StC (2024-01-09 16:11:34+00:00): Pas de souci, je pense avoir corrigé sans problème. De temps en temps j'alerte quand je vois des contributeurs actifs, car plus on est nombreux à être vigilants et mieux c'est.
Aaaah, le transfrontalier avec la Belgique... c'est ça qui vous fait dire "réseau point-nœud" dans le Nord de la France (knooppunten), au lieu du terme français "réseau de carrefour" défini depuis des années par la FFRP :-)
Mathias_ADAV (2024-01-10 13:52:27+00:00): Tu as bien fait ! Je pense que la sémantique "réseau point-nœud" a pour le moment le dessus sur "réseau de carrefour" ;)

Concernant ces réseaux points nœuds, il y-en a encore beaucoup en préparation par le département du Nord et la Métropole Européenne de Lille. Le département de la Somme va continuer à étendre le sien et le département du Pas-de-Calais travaille également dessus. L’intégration de ce type de réseau est assez long à faire. 

J’ai vu que tu animes le Projet OSM Plein-Air, je me demandais si tu connaitrais des personnes intéressé pour ce type de contribution ? Dans la mesure où les données seraient disponibles, cela vaudrait le coup de faire un post sur le forum pour un appel aux bonnes volontés ?
StC (2024-01-11 00:12:32+00:00): Il y a des acteurs locaux très actifs sur les réseaux de carrefours pédestres (dans le département du Nord en particulier). Je pense que sur le forum, ou encore mieux sur le canal Telegram Plein Air, il y a de bonnes chances de créer une dynamique.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-12-18 14:20:28+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1232184389

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
gabro00 (2023-12-21 08:20:06+00:00): Hello,

What data source do you use for edits? I'm asking because it seems it's outdated and according to the IATA website, the QZD IATA code is no longer assigned to Szeged Airport: https://www.iata.org/en/publications/directories/code-search/?airport.search=QZD

The IATA code was removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145289830
DK7080BE (2023-12-18 17:38:41+00:00): Har du set om der er træk&slip;

i osm: toilets:disposal=flush
og vel også: fee=no
Ilstrup (2023-12-20 11:30:02+00:00): Nej, det var låst (kan åbnes med SMS som beskrevet), så jeg fik ikke tjekket.
Revnoplex (2023-12-18 14:25:10+00:00): *Updated Hume Freeway - Bowers Road Intersection
Protoxenus (2024-02-01 18:36:58+00:00): Das hast du genau auf den Luftbildern gesehen, dass da auf dem Rasen eine Sauna steht?
geotom (2024-02-01 21:48:49+00:00): Ich habe nach saunen in der Gegend gesucht, welche ausfindig gemacht und getagt, wo sie ungefähr zu finden sind, damit andere sie auch finden könnten. Du kannst die Geometrie gerne genauer festlegen. Ziel war, usern, die nach Saunen suchen, eine Chance zu geben, welche zu finden.