piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Vonter (2025-09-11 04:32:22+00:00): Hello. Thanks for pointing out the error. Looks like that should have been in the `name` tag as "Shristhi Village". I've fixed it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171763717
Iceman1415 (2025-09-14 09:16:27+00:00): survey by neko14:
https://streetcomplete.app/p/261106.jpg
custodiankeyy (2025-09-10 19:28:17+00:00): Yeni bir bina oluşturmak yerine önceki binayı düzenleyebilirsiniz. Hem böylece elementin geçmişini de korumuş olursunuz.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history
Sanniu (2025-09-11 11:28:09+00:00): Hi, the new road crosses some farm roads, are these roads are removed with new road building or there are intersections with farm roads?
moshikosh (2025-09-11 11:59:55+00:00): i do not know. this segment is published by the israeli public transportation authority and i modified  the map to reflect the change
Sanniu (2025-09-11 13:19:12+00:00): ok, will wait till someone scout this area
Strubbl (2025-09-10 19:47:33+00:00): Hi the_jandroid, the source is only needed as tag of the changeset, not as tag of the object. See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source
Regards, strubbl
the_jandroid (2025-09-10 20:15:25+00:00): Hi strubbl,
thanks for the pointer, I guess I still have the old usage stuck in my head! I’ll rectify these ASAP.
Regards!
Strubbl (2025-09-10 20:42:12+00:00): Thank you for your message, no problem. Do not hurry. This can be fixed later, when somebody with JOSM edits the area and gets the warning. I really appreciate that you are adding the protected areas. Thanks
aharvey (2025-09-11 03:26:26+00:00): Where was the data for these sourced from?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2386039 already exists so https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13133160273 is a duplicate.
Ethan Colley (2025-09-11 06:48:36+00:00): NSW Planning Portal Spacial Viewer, and the basemap of that website.
aharvey (2026-06-02 04:56:42+00:00): I deleted https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13133160267/history since the island/islet place is already mapped as an area at https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16220992
custodiankeyy (2025-09-10 19:26:12+00:00): Please follow naming rules. Write Turkish names for name=* tags in Türkiye. You can add English names with name:en=* tag.

Please see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Localization

“The default name (occupying the ‘name’ tag without suffix) should be the name in whatever language is used locally.”

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171752600
DD1GJ (2025-09-12 09:10:25+00:00): gelöscht, da bereits vorhanden: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/38807356
kapazao (2025-09-16 19:30:32+00:00): Hola, ¿por qué cambias la clasificación de esta calle? ¿sabes cómo funciona la clasificación de las vías en ciudad?
Se pierde la navegación de esta forma y se producen errores de continuidad en las vías.
Por favor no modifiques elementos o etiquetado sin conocimiento y explicación suficiente.
Un saludo
custodiankeyy (2025-09-10 19:23:32+00:00): Tesisi kullanmak ücretsiz mi? Üzretsiz olarak işaretlemişsiniz.
Selim temel (2025-09-10 20:50:40+00:00): Tesis ücretli efendim orayı yanlış yazmışım özürdilerim, esas bizim sorunumuz WhatsApp konumda çıkmadığı için buraya eklemek oldu doğru mu yaptık bilmiyorum
Selim temel (2025-09-10 20:53:56+00:00): Şu an ücretli olarak seçtim seçeneği ve güncelledim
JeanSebastien (2026-07-15 23:01:27+00:00): Bonsoir,
Attention à ce petit morceau de rue laissé "interdit aux véhicules". La barrière n'est fermée qu'en cas d'heure d'entrée/sortie d'école

Comme elle est ouverte la plupart du temps et que le reste de la rue reste en sens unique, j'ai ajouté une note.

Cette rue sera à revoir plus en détail (la bande partagée est indiquée exclusive, alors qu'elle a été effacée récemment, vers la date de publication de cet article https://mdb-idf.org/nogent-sur-marne-2026-plan-circulation/)

Voir https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185814746
pwbriggs (2025-09-16 06:32:29+00:00): Hey there! I haven't gone through and done a full review, but these changes look okay so far. That said, in the future, it's helpful for other mappers if you try to keep the changes you make in a single changeset within a relatively small area, and limit the number of changes in a changeset.

Are you new to OpenStreetMap?

Happy mapping!
bartgron (2025-09-10 20:38:43+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
Carto'Cité (2025-11-16 09:47:58+00:00): Bonjour Antoine,

Merci pour tes photos Panoramax ! :)

J'ai complété l'aménagement que tu avais commencé grâce à tes photos :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1451035079

J'ai aussi précisé des éléments de signalétique.

À ta disposition pour en discuter.

Charles de Carto‘Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
Carto'Cité (2025-11-16 09:54:27+00:00): J'ai mis à joue la relation de la V2 avec et j'ai supprimé les name=V2 qui ne sont pas adapté.
Charles
Iceman1415 (2025-09-14 09:15:16+00:00): survey by neko14
https://streetcomplete.app/p/282190.jpg
Moiety (2025-09-10 13:27:51+00:00): Source: local knowledge
CometSeeker (2025-09-11 17:42:29+00:00): Здравствуйте! Пожалуйста не смешивайте адрес по комплексу и адрес по улице. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Набережные_Челны Исправил в пакете 171796618
Braadpan (2025-09-10 13:43:40+00:00): Even toelichten gezien de historie van een aantal van de verwijderde paden: hertaggen als disused lijkt me hier niet nodig, aangezien geen van de verwijderde paden nog herkenbaar is als pad. De kans op opnieuw intekenen lijkt me daarom verwaarloosbaar :)
vasony (2025-09-14 19:11:41+00:00): Szia!

Ezt visszavontam mert teljesen össze vissza tologattad a határral együtt az utcákat.

Dorog/Esztergom határa az aktuális szabályozási terv alapján van most megrajzolva. Ha valahol nem értesz egyet inkább egyeztessük le, mielőtt megint elromolnak az utak.

Köszi, Tamás
marcmarti (2025-09-12 04:08:43+00:00): ¡Hola! Acuérdate de añadir títulos/comentarios en tus changesets para que la comunidad de OSM sepa el que estás editando.
aharvey (2025-09-11 03:23:00+00:00): Nice work!
NorthCrab_upload (2025-09-10 14:22:09+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1428689582

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
luisforte (2025-09-10 14:15:06+00:00): Error that originated large bbox solved in changeset #171738517
alessandrocarmeli (2025-09-19 20:58:28+00:00): Si prega di non revertare, in quanto i treni effettuano incroci su entrambi i binari, quindi su entrambe le linee principali.
Badojo (2025-09-20 10:21:40+00:00): That's not how that works. The railway is single track which means there is ony one line that is main, others are sidings. It doesn't matter what tracks the trains are using because those track are still classified as sidings. If a train comes it uses the single main track and only if there are two trains, which is rare, then they move to the other track, but that doesn't make a main track it is still a siding
eggie (2025-09-10 15:40:38+00:00): Hoi,

Lijkt me oke. 

MVG
eggie
Moiety (2025-09-10 15:50:46+00:00): Bedankt voor het controleren!
eggie (2025-09-10 15:56:01+00:00): De 'geit-die-bijt' noemen m'n kleinkinderen dat dierenkampje. :)
dypa (2025-09-12 14:27:08+00:00): При указании размеченных не регулируемых пешеходных переходов нельзя использовать тег crossing=zebra, см https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:crossing=zebra

Пожалуйста при внесении следующих правок используйте теги (Размеченный (нерегулируемый) пешеходный переход)
crossing=uncontrolled
crossing:markings=zebra

Заранее спасибо!
Gregory Peony (2025-09-10 16:05:24+00:00): Hi, you appropriately adjusted the residential area to prevent overlaps with footprints. I flagged some footprints here I think represnet vegetation. The footprints you mapped are accurate enough, but could be more so if they were generally smaller. 

When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom in so that you can see the outline of the building and mark the corners carefully. Exclude shadows and yards when tracing the footprint. Keep in mind that you are looking at the roofs of buildings, but mapping their footprints. Depending on how the scene is lit, pitched roofs may have light and dark sections that belong to one building. Generally pitched roofs overhang the walls of a building, so a footprint slightly smaller than the roof is accurate. You can scale selected features in ID with shift+(-/+), or JOSM with ctrl.+alt+Lclick & drag.

Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
Kraan46 (2025-09-10 16:14:51+00:00): Sorry, only reading this comment already feels like a waste of time and delays progress. I know how to map a building with the available imagery quality. This is not motivating at all.
Gregory Peony (2025-09-19 20:18:16+00:00): Well I'm glad that you didn't feel it a waste to reply 😉

Perhaps it was not your intention, but I must say that you comment seemed needlessly hostile. You could have instead writen something like 'You could be more efficient with your feedback by doing a and b, becasue x and z'. I'm just sharing my evaluation of your contribution with you and trying to provide useful feedback.

How is it a waste of time to read the comment another contributor has writen to you? I gave you the TLDR in the first paragraph. Even if it takes a few minutes to read a message which improves your future contributions; I'd say that's worth it. Do you not consider improving your skills progress? 

Perhaps I could consider cutting parts of the comment on a case by case basis, but I like to provide an explanation for why something should be done, not just state that it should. 

Sorry, but "This is not motivating at all." is not very constructive; I can't really apply that in future. Please elaborate. Why isn't it? How could it be made more so?

Regarding your mapping of buildings, I'll Echo my first comment, since I see you mapped them simillarly in a more recent [changeset](https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172165368#map=19/-4.993917/21.407769). Generally the building footpritns are somewhat oversized, becasue they either include the shadow a building casts in the footprint, do not account for roof overhang, or extend beyond the roof/shadow visible in the imagery. 

Note the direction in which shadows are cast and use them to inform the size of features you map. Footprints of pitched roofs can be mapped smaller than the corners of the roof in imagery to account for overhang, so err' on the smaller side. I recommend viewing street level imagery to get a better undestanding of this; it can help a lot when mapping in dense areas. I think the follwing pages are quite useful https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Roof_modelling
yzuio (2025-09-13 00:54:58+00:00): 您好！
G239已经有了相应的关系(8086432)
建议将新239关系合并至老关系中防止冲突
Higashimado (2025-09-16 20:30:30+00:00): 您好！
已删除重复关系，谢谢提醒
StC (2025-09-20 15:51:22+00:00): Bonjour,

et merci pour cette contribution ! Je remarque quelques discontinuités dans l'itinéraires, qui me semblent liées à des chemins "trop longs" que vous n'avez pas ajoutés dans la relation. Quand vous rencontrez ce genre de chemins, n'hésitez surtout pas à les couper là où ils se raccordent à d'autres chemins de l'itinéraire. Je vais m'occuper de ceux que je vois.
olo81 (2025-10-10 22:57:15+00:00): Jeśli ciągi piesze przecinają się z drogami, dajemy punkt na ich przecięciu. Nie nakładamy linii na siebie bez przecięć. 
Kolejna sprawa to przejście dla pieszych z wyspą, które było poprawnie naniesione. Na tym przejściu, rozdzielił pan drogę, nie patrząc w ogóle na jego tagowanie. , ani przecięcia z drogami.
JAAS (2025-10-01 21:17:44+00:00): Dear Mike Ortega,

I've been trying to contact you on several occasions in order to better understand your insisting with turning this particular road into a `trunk` road. I see nothing that would justify this, other than the fact it is a newly made road with individual bus specific separate lanes running through the middle - (something not seen very frequently in Nicaragua). Which reminds me: there are no current bus routes specified as running on these dedicated busways! But there are now 14 bus route relations on the alleged `trunk` oneway road that simply disappear completely on a single node, from which point-on magically turns into a `residential` road is VERY confusing to anyone! Let alone the routing issues this causes...

Usually all `major` road types may have parallel roads running next to them on either sides, but these side roads are seldomly the same type of road classification as the central carriageway for obvious reasons - in this case you've insisted with editing all four carriageways as identical road types. My personal appreciation of this in particular obviously does not match yours.

Another obvious mistake I've found on this same stretch of road is on the connecting roundabouts, on which there are several (bus route) relations going through connecting with other roads, while both roads are sharing a single node [https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/889817624] on the roundabout. This is something very clearly specified on the `roundabout` - OSM wiki page [https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Droundabout] as being incorrectly mapped. No incoming road onto the roundabout should connect with an outgoing road on a single node...

Once again I ask you to please contact me to further explain your personal view on all this and other matters I've previously tried to get your attention on, without you ever responding. I am happy to help you out on all this - and maybe you have some other inside information that would back-up your edits accordingly (which should always appear as part of your edit's comments/sources in order for us other editors questioning your edits to know where that's coming from!).

Regards,
JAAS
mcliquid (2025-09-10 19:34:09+00:00): Hi, das Wiki gibt vor: "Kurz- und mittelfristige Sperrungen sollten ausschließlich über bedingte Zugangsregelungen gelöst werden, siehe DE:Conditional_restrictions."
Ich hatte hier bereits "access:conditional=no @ (2025 Sep 01-2025 Nov 28)" gesetzt gehabt, bei aktuell nicht mal mehr 3 Monaten gilt die Empfehlung laut Wiki zu der Conditional Restriction. Ich ändere das hier wieder ab.
5m4u9 (2025-09-12 04:34:44+00:00): Hola, bienvenid@ y gracias por querer mejorar el mapa.

Quitaste la etiqueta que dice que el camino es de doble sentido (de circulación), no pasa nada ya lo arraglé.

Los otros valores que añadiste son implícitos...
Unarmored5156 (2025-09-15 18:32:02+00:00): Oops, sorry I missed this tagging. Thanks for updating it :)
mavl (2025-11-23 07:40:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 175015324 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible source - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18891].
mavl (2025-11-23 07:40:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 175015324 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible source - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18891].
HugoC01 (2025-09-10 15:09:38+00:00): Bonjour Zazio
Il ne faut supprimer les chemins privés mais ajouter la tag access=private sur les chemins concernés
Bonne journée
silversurfer83 (2025-09-10 19:15:30+00:00): Hi :)

ich vermute, dass diese Info hier bei der FeWo angebracht wäre:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:tourism%3Dapartment

Nur der Name ist nämlich zu wenig ;)

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171740144
morti3 (2025-09-12 05:10:25+00:00): Hi silversurfer 83,
danke für den Hinweis, habe ich ergänzt.
Gruß morti3
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171740144
CelianGdfrd (2025-09-15 07:48:32+00:00): Bonjour, "Maxime & Kasia" n'est pas le nom de l'établissement, c'est bien "Boucherie du 143". C'est probablement un sous-titre sur leur devanture.
CharliStarry (2025-09-12 22:13:41+00:00): I was the one who added the Tram Tag, i will gladly understand if that was incorrect, however, when i saw that road, i saw Rails (now unused) in the road indicative of a past use as a tram way
eggie (2025-09-10 15:06:46+00:00): Reverted due to vandalism by changeset #171741002
eggie (2025-09-10 15:04:48+00:00): reverted du to vandalism by changeset #171740933
bartgron (2025-09-10 15:18:42+00:00): Zestaw zmian wycofany ze względu na mnogość błędów różnego rodzaju:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171741595
Pozdrawiam
eggie (2025-09-10 15:03:41+00:00): reverted due to vandalism by changeset #171740866
eggie (2025-09-10 15:09:46+00:00): Even ter info: 

Het vernielen van een database kan zowel strafrechtelijke sancties (zoals gevangenisstraf en boetes op basis van artikel 350a Wetboek van Strafrecht) als bestuursrechtelijke sancties (boetes en dwangsommen van de Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens op basis van de AVG/GDPR) opleveren, afhankelijk van de context en het doel. De specifieke straffen hangen af van de ernst van de schade, de intentie van de dader en of er sprake is van een datalek of inbreuk op persoonsgegevens. 
Strafrechtelijke sancties

    Artikel 350a Wetboek van Strafrecht:
    Dit artikel stelt het opzettelijk vernielen, beschadigen of onbruikbaar maken van opgeslagen of verwerkte gegevens strafbaar. 

Mogelijke straffen:
Hierop staat een maximale gevangenisstraf van twee jaar. In de praktijk kunnen ook geldboetes, taakstraffen of een combinatie van deze straffen worden opgelegd, afhankelijk van de ernst van het feit en recidive (herhaling). 
Schadevergoeding:
Naast de straf kan de dader ook verplicht worden om de schade die de vernieling heeft veroorzaakt, te vergoeden aan het slachtoffer
Braadpan (2025-09-10 15:00:26+00:00): Toelichting review_requested: dit is mijn eerste edit die relaties (routes) aanpast. Ik heb alles zorgvuldig nagekeken in JOSM en volgens mij kloppen de aanpassingen zo, maar een extra paar ogen erop kan geen kwaad, lijkt me. Verder is highway=bridleway mogelijk niet de juiste tag voor de paden waar paardrijden is toegestaan (er staat nergens een G9, alleen paaltjes met "Paardenpad"), maar voor zover ik heb kunnen vinden is daar onder Nederlandse mappers nog geen consensus over ( https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/ruiterpad-bridleway/56475 ), dus voor nu hou ik maar vast aan de bestaande gewoonte in dit gebied. Alvast bedankt voor de review :)!
kortgodt (2025-09-10 16:02:33+00:00): Du misser stadig en del forbindelser til sideveje m.m. tror det er bedre hvis du holder dig fra at separere cykelstier fra veje hvor de ikke løber separat.
kortgodt (2025-09-10 16:04:20+00:00): Når du laver separationen fremgår det heller ikke længere hvilken slags cycleway der er tale om f.eks. lane vs. Track
Lostmonkey (2025-09-10 16:40:26+00:00): Hvad er egentlig fordelen ved at optegne alle de cykelstier separat, hvis de i virkeligheden ikke er adskilt fra vejbanen med mere end en malet streg eller kantsten og i øvrigt allerede er tagget korrekt på vejen? Gør det ikke blot kortet mere kompliceret at vedligeholde?
OneWheelMapper (2025-09-10 17:05:13+00:00): Jeg havde problemer med navigation på cykelstierne med underlige artefakter, og tænkte derfor "hvad skade kan det gøre at tegne dem seperat og undgå disse problemer". Man ret tydeligt forstå at svaret var "stor skade". Jeg havde ikke læst reglerne igennem før jeg gik igang og har i virkeligheden faktisk lavet vandalisme uden at vide det. Så hvis ændringerne til cykler skal rulles tilbage skal jeg nok finde en måde at gøre det på, og måske finde et andet kort til cykelnavigation som ikke beder mig lave u-vendinger midt i kryds. Havde lidt håbet på ikke at modtage 16 mails på 3 timer om hvordan de ændringer jeg har lavet de sidste par dage har ødelagt kortet nogle steder. Det var sku lidt stressende må jeg indrømme, men som sagt, hvis det kan rulles tilbage gør jeg det gerne, det lyder også som måden jeg kan undgå at gå yderligere mails i min indboks fra kortgodt de kommende dage der fortæller mig at hver eneste ændring har smadret tidligere arbejde.
Lostmonkey (2025-09-10 17:17:27+00:00): Vi har nok alle prøvet at lave fejl eller uhensigtsmæssig kortlægning på et tidspunkt, så tag ikke kritiske kommentar alt for tungt. Det vigtigste er at rette evt. fejl og så lære af det. 🙂 Hvis du en anden gang er lidt i tvivl om den bedste fremgangsmåde, er du altid velkommen til først at spørge i forummet. Det kan godt tage lidt tid at få et svar, men der kommer som regel et. Og husk også, at selvom det nogle gange kan se sådan ud, er det ikke altid OSM-data der er problemet, når apps eller andre navigationstjenester opfører sig mærkeligt.
OneWheelMapper (2025-09-10 17:38:53+00:00): Tak for et nede på jorden svar 😄
Bruger nok lige lidt tid på at prøve at fikse så mange fejl jeg kan i mit lille fuck up her, og så skal jeg nok bruge forummet i fremtiden før jeg går igang med et stort projekt 😅
Lostmonkey (2025-09-19 21:16:43+00:00): Mht. at fikse fejl: Som kortgodt nævnte er disse nye separate stier nogle steder nu lidt misvisende, da de i virkeligheden bare er malede baner. Retter du stadig?
OneWheelMapper (2025-09-19 21:24:26+00:00): Fik lidt travlt men ja, min intention er at få rettet så meget som jeg lige kan finde af det jeg fik skrevet forkert. Har fået sat mig ind i cykelreglerne så vil gøre det så godt som jeg nu kan
Lostmonkey (2025-09-19 21:28:58+00:00): 👍
eggie (2025-09-10 15:19:04+00:00): Reverted
eggie (2025-09-10 15:18:26+00:00): reverted
eggie (2025-09-10 15:17:13+00:00): reverted by changeset #171741529
dieterdreist (2026-05-12 15:20:25+00:00): I wonder how you checked the sidewalks, for example here is no sidewalk: way 1428771156
AndySchulte (2025-11-20 08:49:12+00:00): Moin Tim,
wenn du die Adresse ohnehin schon aktualisierst, wäre es super, den POI direkt an die richtige Stelle mitzuziehen. Ich habe ihn jetzt bereits nach Köln verschoben – sonst landet man schnell mal im rund 200 km entfernten Bad Homburg.

Grüße Andy
eggie (2025-09-10 15:15:47+00:00): reverted by changeset #171741470
NorthCrab_upload (2025-09-10 18:32:21+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1064152439

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
user_5359 (2025-09-11 07:49:05+00:00): Welcolme to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/4950470545. Please notice the difference between a name and a description. 
If you need more information (and cannot find any examples or ask anyone else), please visit our wiki at https://wiki.osm.org.

By the way, is the stop sign for pedestrians or for cars?
eggie (2025-09-10 15:20:17+00:00): Reverted by changeset #171741689
eggie (2025-09-10 15:37:55+00:00): Welkom bij OSM... 
Bedankt voor uw bijdrage. 
Probeer in het vervolg de bestaande adresnode te gebruiken. 
De info heb ik samengevoegd met de adresnode.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-09-10 15:25:30+00:00): reverted by changeset #171741979
eggie (2025-09-10 15:26:30+00:00): reverted by changeset Wijzigingenset #171742031