piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2024-05-01 20:16:52+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Carto_Ferret (2024-05-01 19:01:41+00:00): Correction:
Comment is "Updated features in the vicinity of Lotissement Vaiterupe #adt".
Source is "Bing aerial imagery; Mapillary".
Ewrt1 (2024-05-01 20:39:10+00:00): Thanks for fixing your own edit to the Superstore
Glassman (2024-05-02 16:32:27+00:00): #TIP: OSM recommends spelling out street names. The reason is software has a hard time unabbreviating.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150765100
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-12 05:03:48+00:00): Thank you for mapping. The mapping looks great and also the changeset comment. Happy Mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150765718
tekim (2024-05-01 19:57:32+00:00): reverting a changeset that contains fake data

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150766859
tekim (2024-05-01 19:56:54+00:00): reverting a changeset that contains fake data

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150766841
tekim (2024-05-01 19:56:07+00:00): reverting a changeset that contains fake data

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150766800
tekim (2024-05-01 19:55:28+00:00): reverting a changeset that contains fake data

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150766779
tekim (2024-05-01 19:54:23+00:00): reverting a changeset that contains fake data

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150766742
tekim (2024-05-01 20:07:27+00:00): reverting a changeset that contains fake edits

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150767192
tekim (2024-05-01 20:06:39+00:00): reverting a changeset that contains fake edits

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150767173
eggie (2024-05-01 20:17:40+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
tekim (2024-05-01 20:05:19+00:00): reverting a changeset that contains fake edits

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150767126
Supaplex (2024-05-18 06:01:40+00:00): There is already one on the map: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3019927968
Please be aware there is already a restaurant in the local language exist
tekim (2024-05-01 20:04:36+00:00): reverting a changeset that contains fake edits

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150767108
tekim (2024-05-01 20:04:05+00:00): reverting a changeset that contains fake edits

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150767093
tekim (2024-05-01 20:03:24+00:00): reverting a changeset that contains fake edits

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150767072
tekim (2024-05-01 20:06:09+00:00): reverting a changeset that contains fake edits

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150767150
tekim (2024-05-01 20:23:12+00:00): reverting a fake edit - there is already a beach mapped to the East of this location

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150767737
Daniela Castan (2024-05-01 20:30:35+00:00): The beach isn't on the right place and i also added new information. I work for the Baie de Beauport and was asked to do so.
tekim (2024-05-01 21:08:30+00:00): Thanks for your response.  There is already a beach to the east mapped as an area. If that is wrong, you should modify it rather than creating a new feature.  However, the current beach area feature looks reasonable- a sandy area next to the water.  You placed a point (node) between that sandy area and the parking lot.
tekim (2024-05-01 21:13:48+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/239023651
Is the existing beach
miluethi (2024-05-01 20:27:44+00:00): Gryffon,

I noticed that your adding buildings to OSM Nicaragua. 

One suggestion, can you square the building by selecting a shape and pressing the "Q" key on the iD editor?

Thank you for your contribution and happy mapping!
VLD549 (2024-05-15 19:07:13+00:00): Hi, I recently understood that in case of voetwegen, we should write the name first, and then the number.

A message from one of your mapping colleagues: 
Putting the name as first gives priority to the name and puts the administrative number (of a system that is old and confusing) on a second place.

Should I change the order now to 
Lintbaan - Voetweg 70?

Thank you!
NorthCrab_upload (2024-05-01 20:10:32+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4317645718
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11867349350

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
MxxCon (2024-05-03 21:46:04+00:00): Hello.
Please note name_1= tag should never be used. As documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names we have many different types of name tags that should address most situations.
Additionally, street names should not be abbreviated. For example, in this very case, what does "St" mean, is it "street" or "Saint"? To avoid confusions like that names should be fully spelled out. Computers are good at figuring out how to shorten something if it doesn't fit on the screen, but it's not as easy to go the other way.

Also you can ignore tiger:*= tags. They are leftovers from the massive street data import many years ago. These tags don't really service any purpose.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150767247
Famlam (2024-05-01 20:28:50+00:00): Vergeten bronnen: BAG & survey
derloris (2024-05-15 02:02:03+00:00): Hallo! Jemand hat hier eine Frage zum (ehem?) GH Ochsattel gestellt, vielleicht weißt du Bescheid: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4246587
LG
NorthCrab_upload (2024-05-01 20:30:23+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.

"Leszczynek 49a":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11872597970

"Leszczynek 43":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11872597981

"Leszczynek 2c":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11872597984

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-01-24 08:46:03+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11872603769/history - is shop=clothes best fitting?

Maybe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Doutpost would fit better if that is place that has meager supply of products (or none) but allows pick up of orderer products?
user_21293476 (2024-05-01 20:34:07+00:00): 据悉，梅龙高速发生路面塌方事故，在此对所有事件牺牲者表示逝者安息
user_21293476 (2024-05-01 20:35:24+00:00): R.I.P for all innocent lives.
GSF1200S (2024-05-02 15:48:29+00:00): RIP
tekim (2024-05-02 23:18:35+00:00): Reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150814723
mini-me (2024-05-02 16:45:55+00:00): Уже отмечено тегом loc_name
tekim (2024-05-02 23:15:42+00:00): Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap!  Thanks for your edit to the map, we appreciate it.  I see you cited Google Maps as the source for your edit.  Unfortunately, when editing OpenStreetMap we are not allowed to use (copy from, cite as a source, use a reference, use for validation) Google Maps due to Google's Terms of Service.

Ciao, benvenuto su OpenStreetMap! Grazie per la tua modifica alla mappa, lo apprezziamo. Vedo che hai citato Google Maps come fonte per la tua modifica. Sfortunatamente, quando modifichiamo OpenStreetMap non siamo autorizzati a utilizzare (copiare da, citare come fonte, utilizzare un riferimento, utilizzare per la convalida) Google Maps a causa dei Termini di servizio di Google.
tekim (2024-05-02 23:16:37+00:00): Reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150814689
VA00 (2025-01-03 17:48:02+00:00): O jakiego rodzaju "dane" chodzi? Co zawierają? Same nr. dróg pożarowych, czy coś więcej, np: przebieg i klasę nawierzchni, szlabany itp.
Violaine_Do (2024-12-04 23:49:56+00:00): Hi cartogravy, could you please correct the error in alignment on this area? I have seen several of your changesets here and as discussed with your colleagues, I do not agree with the way you moved everything to fit one value you took as a reference from Strava. Here I find (-3.29, -1.09) shift in Bing my end. And so the buildings are not at the right place and many many other things. This shift seems to fit with some buildings so I would be happy with tht... Thks for your answer
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150769719
cartogravy (2024-12-06 22:45:06+00:00): Hi Violaine_Do,
Thanks for providing that offset, I’ll review the area and update where I see there are issues.
Best regards,
cartogravy
Violaine_Do (2024-12-06 23:10:29+00:00): Hi, thks, please be aware, the offset can vary because of tiling. And remember to correct only the buildings that were moved compared to orginal buildings. Here is the data source : https://www.tefenua.data.gov.pf/datasets/3daf585dd43e41b78aa3e7a0f9bcb294_17/
Violaine_Do (2024-12-06 23:12:20+00:00): I think the best would be to take those buildings to align imagery on it depending on the location. I know it is complex but the data source is high location quality (made by land surveyors through GPS, photogrammetry).
Violaine_Do (2024-12-06 23:12:46+00:00): Happy mapping !
hoserab (2024-05-01 21:53:00+00:00): Denver is now "near Calgary"...?
Ewrt1 (2024-05-03 20:00:46+00:00): It's an entire country apart.
Josef73 (2026-01-22 20:28:52+00:00): Hello, can you check the value of the tag opening_hours form the node  Matrioska - Oficina de Costura (11841607372). Thanks
VA00 (2025-05-02 16:12:13+00:00): Dojazd pożarowy 34A był już dodany 2 lata temu. Teraz są duplikaty. Proszę sprawdzać przed dodaniem.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-24 01:13:20+00:00): have you discussed this import with anyone?
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-24 01:13:40+00:00): see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
rowcherryrow (2024-05-02 18:23:18+00:00): Correction: Source used was Bing aerial imagery; Mapillary
Kovoschiz (2024-05-02 07:44:14+00:00): Please don't blindly correct, or make uninformed assumptions. There is a noticeable sidewalk here. The existence of `footway=sidewalk` doesn't affect that.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-25 15:10:33+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11872743394/history has rooms = 0 that was added in this edit
What was meant by this? That this object has no rooms? Seems surprising here
Friendly_Ghost (2024-05-25 21:50:09+00:00): Hoi TWHB,

Welke bron(nen) gebruik je om deze data toe te voegen?

Mvg,

Casper
woodpeck (2024-05-12 18:17:12+00:00): Dear Lucas Marques, please stop any and all mapping efforts on the territory of Ukraine until the war is over. See also: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Russian–Ukrainian_war
fortera_au (2024-05-01 22:58:13+00:00): Hi, please include a changeset description on your changesets.

Is there also definitely no bicycle access allowed on these train platforms?
AngocA (2024-05-20 03:31:53+00:00): Hola DBDOssa.

Cambié las propiedades de la Pisciloca, ya que no es realmente un waterway=stream. En OSM se considera como un attraction=log_flume.
Puede que cambie la forma de cómo aparece en el mapa.
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/how-to-map-a-lazy-river-in-an-amusement-park/113429
DVDOssa (2024-05-20 15:20:17+00:00): Hola AngocA. Tienes Razón! Gracias Por la Aclaración!!
BCNorwich (2024-05-02 06:05:41+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Good start to mapping. I wonder though if the house Way: 1214328108 ought to be number twelve instead of ten. Perhaps you could check, please.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2024-05-02 06:11:31+00:00): Hi, I wonder if the house you've tagged as number 12 should rather be number 10, perhaps you could check, please.

Regards Bernard.
rvc113 (2024-05-02 07:10:52+00:00): HI . The pond is there. I can provide photographic evidence. 
teh disagreement is if there is indeed a beach, which for me is natrual surface /place that you can enter a body of water by walking in. I will re-add the pond and leave the beach if contentious.
silversurfer83 (2024-05-02 12:51:33+00:00): Gude :)

guck mal hier: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:tunnel%3Dbuilding_passage und vergleich das mal mit deinen Änderungen :)

cheers
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150771684
NorthCrab_upload (2024-05-01 23:00:29+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11872831515
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/451265059

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
nevw (2024-05-02 00:55:57+00:00): Hi, it is preferred that you don't use the roadway nodes when defining areas.
MxxCon (2024-05-03 21:58:33+00:00): Hello.
It looks like many of the features that you mapped UNDER this highway you attached to the highway itself. This is most definitely incorrect and must be corrected.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150772819
MapMagics (2024-05-14 00:06:45+00:00): Correction: Source used was IDE.uy Ortophotos 2019- Licencia de Datos Abiertos - Uruguay.
CurlingMan13 (2024-05-02 04:02:12+00:00): Please use more detailed changesets.  What did you change, and why?  "tpc" tells me nothing.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150773873
fortera_au (2024-05-02 01:47:03+00:00): Hey there, you'll usually want to square off buildings, you can press Q in iD and JOSM when the building way is selected to do this.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150774122
Glassman (2024-05-02 16:34:15+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.

#TIP: save the address nodes since they can be reassigned in the future.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150774618
tyfi (2024-10-16 17:02:47+00:00): Hey, thanks a ton for working on houses and other features in this area.

I just wanted to let you know that I renamed the ambulance station from "ROCK TOWNSHIP AMBULANCE DIST" to "Rock Township Ambulance District Station #2". In OSM we steer clear of abbreviations like "dist" unless it's part of the brand/official name, and we usually title-case names, too, unless the capitalization is meant to be stylized. I did this in https://osm.org/changeset/157974690.

Thanks again!
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2024-05-03 11:15:41+00:00): Please keep bicycle=yes when it is permitted on footpaths because some routing engine could otherwise ignore these connections.
hewin (2024-05-03 18:30:22+00:00): Thanks for the information, I have updated this in changeset 150851318 for foot paths that are easily accessible by bike where curb cuts allow seamless access.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2024-05-06 13:07:00+00:00): :-)
robby_rumble (2024-05-15 21:08:10+00:00): Interested to learn more about this changeset. Bicycles are prohibited from unofficial/unmarked trails per FPCC. https://fpdcc.com/about/rules-regulations/#trail

Additionally the pieces of trail connecting to the Weber Spur on the south side of the North Branch have been razed and no longer exists.
nickvet419 (2024-05-15 22:50:14+00:00): yep,  but it is used by the public.   if you'd like to do some reading on it, see https://activetrans.org/blog/whats-happening-with-the-remaining-section-of-the-weber-spur-trail  and https://www.facebook.com/groups/323054253736647
robby_rumble (2024-05-16 13:22:40+00:00): Sorry, I'm specifically referring to ways like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/738895536 which were correctly classified by user alopex_ii 5 months ago.

I completely agree with the classification of the Weber Spur itself.
nickvet419 (2024-05-16 19:42:51+00:00): Ok, i updated to paths to better describe their use "footways, not marked as official "informal" foot paths by the FPDCC but people do use them to hike and bike.
robby_rumble (2024-05-16 20:04:29+00:00): Ok, that brings us back to the link in my original message – bicycles are prohibited on these informal footpaths per FPCC
nickvet419 (2024-05-16 21:01:30+00:00): yes there is a rule that states that along with hiking on unmarked trails on the map, but that is what the paths are used for. 
some of the paths are also not as informal as seen here, there is a path clearly marked out on ground. https://www.google.com/maps/@41.9801051,-87.744882,3a,15y,104.53h,83.55t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1ssmUmrxy9sB5vhKVQaSvoxA!2e0!7i16384!8i8192?authuser=0&entry=ttu
fortera_au (2024-05-02 04:05:58+00:00): Hey, w1278963047 looks more like a service road than an unclassified one.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150775344
Glassman (2024-05-02 16:35:23+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150775438
RedX1276 (2024-05-09 16:03:32+00:00): This is a driveway of a private residence and should not be shown on the map. Please delete.
ftrebien (2024-05-02 18:42:41+00:00): A etiqueta hazard=* só deve ser usada para perigos permanentes constam em placas de sinalização e em fontes oficiais, não para situações temporárias.
ftrebien (2024-05-02 18:44:52+00:00): Nós devemos evitar mapear situações temporárias. Uma ponte pode levar tempo para ser reconstruída, mas uma inundação e quedas de objetos na pista geralmente são resolvidos em pouco tempo e com pouco custo. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Boas_pr%C3%A1ticas#N%C3%A3o_mapear_eventos_ou_elementos_tempor%C3%A1rios
Frlara (2024-05-02 19:36:54+00:00): Fiz esse conjunto de alterações baseado em notícias sobre pontes derrubadas ou de estradas destruídas pelas enchentes.
Exemplos:
* https://grupoahora.net.br/conteudos/2024/04/30/ponte-e-levada-pela-correnteza-em-santa-tereza-durante-video-da-prefeita/
* https://diariosm.com.br/noticias/video_ponte_desaba_e_bloqueia_a_rsc_287_em_santa_maria.591202
* https://jornaldecandelaria.com.br/destaques/ponte-da-rsc-287-na-divisa-entre-candelaria-e-novo-cabrais-esta-interditada/
* https://jornaldecandelaria.com.br/destaques/cabeceira-da-ponte-sobre-o-rio-pardo-despenca-apos-enchente/
* https://www.gaz.com.br/video-forca-da-agua-derruba-ponte-entre-candelaria-e-cerro-branco/
* https://estradas.com.br/estradas-do-rio-grande-do-sul-estao-em-estado-de-alerta/

Desculpa se cometi algum erro, não tenho experiência mapeando situações de desastres, mas a situação por aqui tá realmente crítica, esses bloqueios de estradas não vão se resolver quando a água baixar, vai precisar de uma grande reconstrução.

E sobre as tags de hazard, a descrição na wiki me parece bem compatível com a realidade dessas situações. Existe algum guia mais completo sobre a utilização dessa tag?
ftrebien (2024-05-02 22:45:32+00:00): Sem problemas, eu percebi que você  começou a mapear há pouco. Se quiser, recomendo entrar no grupo do Telegram do Rio Grande do Sul, estivemos conversando sobre como mapear esses bloqueios hoje e ontem lá: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Canais_para_contato#Telegram
ftrebien (2024-05-02 22:52:26+00:00): A etiqueta hazard, até onde eu sei, só é suportada pelo OpenHazardMap, que é um projeto ainda embrionário. Não que isso significa que não deva ser usada, mas acho melhor seguir a recomendação do wiki e aplicar só onde houver sinalização. O risco é a situação se normalizar e a etiqueta ficar no mapa quando o perigo transitório deixar de existir. Tem mais impacto prático (que acho que é o seu objetivo, assim como o meu) mapear a etiqueta access=* nas vias bloqueadas, ou usar etiquetas de ciclo de vida (ex.: destroyed:highway, destroyed:bridge). Mas temos que lembrar que no OSM nós não mapeamos situações temporárias (como diz o guia que mandei antes), um bom horizonte de futuro é mapear situações que não vão mudar dentro de umas 2 semanas ou mais. Então, queda de pontes ou abertura de crateras faz sentido mapear, inundação acho que não (os trechos alagados tendem a drenar em poucos dias). Quedas de barreiras (pedras, árvores) também costumam ser resolvidas em poucos dias. É melhor priorizar as situações que tendem a se prolongar. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenHazardMap
hendrik-17 (2024-06-08 20:44:50+00:00): Moin,

ich habe diese (hoffentlich nicht ganz ernst gemeinte) Änderung revertiert.

Auch wenn man auf den Bing-Luftbildern etwas vermeintlich lustiges entdeckt, sollten die OSM-Daten nur Dinge enthalten, die es vor Ort tatsächlich gibt.

Ein Hinweis noch: fast alle deine Änderungen enthalten nur den Kommentar "Geländebearbeitung". Manchmal ist es hilfreich, einen etwas aussagekräftigeren Kommentar zu verwenden. Siehe dazu auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments.

Beste Grüße
Vinber-Pro (2024-05-12 10:24:42+00:00): Bonjour,
ce nom est une description.

Si tu souhaites renseigner une référence de porte, alors sans doute voir du coté de https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:entrance mais pas dans le nom ?

à discuter
Bauer33333 (2024-05-03 19:49:43+00:00): Thank you
adiatmad (2024-05-08 14:58:04+00:00): Test comment feature.
(https://github.com/OSMCha/osmcha-frontend/issues/720)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150776988
jb54osm (2024-05-02 10:49:29+00:00): Dag,

De Theresiastraat (no-deel) is onlangs geheel verklinkerd. Ik zet het wegdek terug op paving stones.
pittrichimica (2024-05-02 17:23:59+00:00): Hello, ik ben er langs gefietst voor de laadpalen en ik zag wel nog geasfalteerde delen. Maar misschien heb ik het overdreven, dus ok met die wijziging. Zal er volgende keer nog eens beter gaan kijken waar de klinkers beginnen.
jb54osm (2024-05-02 17:35:56+00:00): Dag,

Het 'modernere' winkeldeel van de Theresiastraat is nog asfalt. En bij Vlaskamp is het ook asfalt. Maar het tussenstuk is helemaal opnieuw ingericht: nieuwe rioleringen, ander groen, en klinkers ;-) .
Veel plezier verder!
eggie (2024-05-02 07:00:13+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
user_11609320 (2024-05-02 06:15:39+00:00): project was already approved by the county. houses and farms are currently being demolished . this area is currently in the process of being annexed into barstow
user_11609320 (2024-05-02 06:19:02+00:00): https://www.barstowca.org/Home/Components/News/News/3972/18
user_11609320 (2024-05-02 06:21:56+00:00): https://www.mdaqmd.ca.gov/Home/Components/News/News/511/18?backlist=%2f
user_11609320 (2024-05-02 06:26:17+00:00): https://files.ceqanet.opr.ca.gov/295844-1/attachment/42EuYlBHLc6XVMDR64GCc5m77Yr7wdB0UPIDIyzmRo7ryfpEEauw27CsOVzqEwF6R5HDOz2RhiGQuRFd0
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-05-02 22:46:01+00:00): Please don't upload before fixing warnings.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-06 05:06:59+00:00): Consolidate and clean up remaining SEO spam tags for the two remaining POIs at the same location for Two Men and a Truck in Albuquerque in changeset 183722347

https://osm.org/changeset/183722347
Vinber-Pro (2024-05-07 06:59:05+00:00): salut,
gargotte est une description et pas un nom (name=*)

à creuser sur cuisine=malagasy ou fast_food:MG=gargotte par exemple mais pas dans le name :)

De plus le commentaire est toujours le même, sans précision sur ce qui est fait, je pense que ce n'est plus la cartopartie madatlas !

à plus