piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
husni-RC (2026-07-21 00:56:15+00:00): Hi user_5359,

Thank you for checking our changeset.

This changeset is from real community mapping activity by our village volunteers from Indonesian Red Cross (PMI SIBAT), using OsmAnd and iD edior in the field to digitize building footprint, land use, public facility, and neighborhood (RT/RW) boundary, as part of Vulnerability and Capacity Assessment (VCA) for disaster risk reduction.

For the two key you mentioned, 'description:kerentanan' (vulnerability) and 'description:kapasitas' (capacity), our volunteer use it to note condition within the location, such as elderly, disability, infant present (kerentanan), and available community resource like midwife, teacher, RT leader (kapasitas).

After we think again, this key is not suitable to be public OSM tag, because it can show personal information of vulnerable people connected to specific household location.

We will not remove it immediately, but change it step by step: first replace to something more neutral and less identifiable, then gradually remove it entirely, while the detail VCA data will be moved to our internal tool (not public, combined per RT/RW level). The other data (building, land use, boundary, facility) will stay, since that part is meant to be permanent.

If you or other mapper have advice how to prevent this in our next field activity, we will appreciate it.
FajrAl (2026-07-21 06:12:59+00:00): Halo tim PMI, terima kasih banyak atas kontribusinya terhadap OpenStreetMap (OSM). Namun, perlu diketahui bahwa tidak semua data hasil survei lapangan harus diunggah ke OSM. Kami menyarankan pihak PMI untuk merekrut ahli GIS yang menguasai aplikasi QGIS dan QField untuk mengelola data internal.

Seperti yang disampaikan sebelumnya, data survei PMI memang sangat bermanfaat jika ada di OSM. Kendati demikian, karena tidak semua objek relevan untuk dimasukkan, mohon kesediaannya untuk berdiskusi terlebih dahulu dengan Komunitas OpenStreetMap Indonesia guna menyelaraskan skema data sebelum diunggah.

---

Hello PMI team, thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap (OSM). However, please note that not all field survey data needs to be uploaded to OSM. We suggest that PMI recruit a GIS specialist proficient in QGIS and QField to manage internal data.

As mentioned previously, PMI's survey data is indeed very valuable when available on OSM. Nevertheless, since not all objects are suitable for inclusion, we kindly ask for your cooperation in discussing this with the OpenStreetMap Indonesia Community first to align the data schema prior to uploading.
FajrAl (2026-07-21 06:14:09+00:00): Anda dan tim bisa bergabung dalam kanal Telegram https://t.me/osmindonesia
husni-RC (2026-07-22 02:19:12+00:00): Halo Mas Fajr, terima kasih banyak atas saran dan masukannya.

Update: kami sudah menghapus seluruh tag non-standar (description:kerentanan dan description:kapasitas) dari semua objek terkait. Data VCA-nya sudah kami pindahkan ke pengelolaan internal terpisah.

Saran soal rekrut GIS specialist dan pakai QGIS/QField untuk data internal sangat kami apresiasi so far masih bisa dihandle internal, Kami juga sudah bergabung di grup Telegram OSM Indonesia.

Terima kasih atas waktu dan masukannya.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2026-07-17 12:18:24+00:00): Hi!

Can you confirm that all the hgv=no you added have a specific sign saying so? Wouldn't hgv=delivery or destination be better? Trucks are permitted almost anywhere for delivery, otherwise it would be very difficult to built/renovate any house in the affected streets.
VitoVejnović (2026-07-17 13:18:59+00:00): Thank you for your message.

The signs I tagged are clearly visible on Mapillary 2024 imagery.
On 13e Avenue, south of Rue Provost, there are two signs with a red crossed-out truck and the text 'excepté livraison locale' - these are tagged as hgv=delivery (delivery allowed, no through traffic).
North of Rue Provost, there are plain red crossed-out truck signs - no additional text - which are tagged as hgv=no (no trucks at all). These are confirmed by signs at Rue Provost and Rue Sherbrooke.
According to OSM guidelines, a plain 'no trucks' sign is tagged as hgv=no, while a sign with 'except local delivery' is tagged as hgv=delivery is exactly what I've applied here.
Every changeset is reviewed by another team member in our project OptimoRoute organised editing, and this one will be checked as well.

If you spot any inconsistencies, we're happy to revisit.
Thanks again for reaching out!
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2026-07-17 22:42:29+00:00): OK perfect thanks, just checking, because it happens that some users just add hgv=no because they think there are too many trucks passing by, even when there are no sign forbidding trucks or buses.
jayaddison (2026-07-22 09:17:02+00:00): Thank you!
eggie (2026-07-17 14:31:47+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  Beperk het gebied van je edits tot een enkele straat. Dit is lastig te controleren. 
Schuiven met de kaart geeft vaak schade door onbedoelde verplaatsingen van objecten met alles dat er aan vastzit.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Halfix (2026-07-19 20:24:22+00:00): "Mitarbeiterrestaurant emile (MO28)" is finally out of business since June 25, 2026. Removal of the POI by greenlinephoto was appropriate.
ajmat (2026-07-21 10:50:07+00:00): Hi Halfix, thank you for confirming the closure and for providing context along with local knowledge. I initially acted regarding to the issues with the multipoligon here, and I’ll make sure to reflect the current status. Thank you again for your explanation.
brunesto (2026-07-20 08:51:10+00:00): Hello, the way just south of
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14022159407
was removed, I just want to check if this was intended. Thanks
Alenyshka (2026-07-20 12:39:13+00:00): Hello! No, that happened by accident -I apologize, I've already fixed it.
Dimitar155 (2026-07-17 16:27:23+00:00): Ще бъде пешеходен до бул. Васил Левски. След публикуването на новината са я променили.
bobbyfuego (2026-07-17 19:00:47+00:00): Мерси, добавих и останалата част!
Fizzie-DWG (2026-07-24 04:56:45+00:00): DWG revert - fictitious mapping

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186273165
BerryTrails (2026-07-17 12:51:33+00:00): Beleza, cara. Quando fiz as alterações, o arquivo estava aberto. Valeu pelas mudanças.
真中あお (2026-07-17 18:21:13+00:00): 您好，感谢您为osm作出贡献，不过关于您的编辑有一些建议：
对于滑坡体，更合适的标签是 natural=landslide ；对于损毁的道路，相比完全删除，更好的做法是将损毁部分添加生命周期前缀 destroyed:* ，这样可以提示其他编辑者这里不是没画，还可以保留原有的关系。
我留言时看到已经有其他编辑者进行了编辑，完成了如上改进。
祝编安~
user_5359 (2026-07-20 17:55:55+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14022344081, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14022344079. What is the mean of the tag natuyrak = spring?
mewhenthe (2026-07-21 04:10:18+00:00): Hello. I have concerns regarding your recent changesets. Many of them are questionable at best, and contain comments that is purely jargon.

I have reverted these changesets for the following reasons:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185903682 - An air conditioning unit is not Rainbet's mainframe
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185903527 - Arbitrary natural tag
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185863245 - A website is not a military zone
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185578364 - Arbitrary addition of military landuse
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185484223 - A hedge is not present on the freeway, let alone 41mi long
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185483336 - Not a glacier, bad name
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185480741 - A building does not cover the road
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185480534 - There are no barriers here
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185463429 - There are buildings here, however they do not span the mapped area
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185431622 - Dubious residential area, I am certain it is not called "NDIII Safety Corridor"
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185368529 - Unsourced claim

If you could, please stop making these dubious edits. OSM should not be used a personal playground.
Frank Peng (2026-07-17 19:43:25+00:00): Hey Aline, please note that straight ways should only have two nodes, that's one line between two nodes without any nodes in between. I see in this changeset that you added a node to a straight section of a road. When you see a road in aerial imagery that is dead-straight, map it as just one line between two nodes without any nodes in between. Per the "Good practice" article on OSM Wiki, it states:

> When there's a road that's dead-straight, draw it as such. That's done by just one line between two nodes without any nodes in between.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Keep_straight_ways_straight
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185904022
下り専門 (2026-07-18 00:32:51+00:00): 柴谷雄介さん、こんにちは。
OpenStreetMapにようこそ。

追加してもらったポイントについて、パン屋とのことですので、地物の種類をレストランからパン屋に変更しておきました。確認お願いします。
ホームセンターについても変更してみてください。
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185904711
pitscheplatsch (2026-07-18 07:17:33+00:00): Hallo, willkommen bei OSM.
Bei dem eingetragenen Namen handelt es sich wohl eher nicht um den Namen des Gebäudes, oder? 
Leerstand (300070788), v10
Georgpb (2026-07-18 08:11:54+00:00): Danke fürs Willkommen.
Der Name von diesem Gebäude lautete nah und gut. Der Betreiber dieses Geschäftes hat im April den Verkauf aufgegeben. Seit dem steht das Gebäude leer.
pitscheplatsch (2026-07-19 07:28:50+00:00): Danke für die Antwort. Wäre es dann aber nicht besser, die Node komplett zu entfernen, anstatt eine Node mit dem Namen "Leerstand" hier in OSM zu erhalten?
FajrAl (2026-07-17 14:42:01+00:00): These are all have duplicate buildings! 
I have left comments regarding your buildings mapping, please take a moment to review them. You should not map multiple building that actually can be just one building.
FajrAl (2026-07-17 15:24:02+00:00): This changeset have been reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185910100
BMM_sukamiru (2026-07-18 13:21:05+00:00): 私も最近ネギラーメン派になりました
美味しいですよね！
vectorial8192 (2026-07-18 15:58:35+00:00): Disappointing, but the idea was that "number 80" at least should not be here.

It is OK to persist the shop space, but this cannot possibly mean we can affirm the relationship between this suspiciously-placed bakery and subsequent legitimate users of "number 80".

Though perhaps the topic of shop space itself can be further discussed at Discord.
Kovoschiz (2026-07-19 08:47:46+00:00): What's "should not be here"? The `=bakery` is 80 Shop 5. Why "cannot possibly mean we can affirm the relationship"?
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-17 13:59:49+00:00): SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is not allowed on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account; see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more information. Furthermore, use of Google Maps as a source is strictly prohibited by both OSM and Google policies--see https://osm.wiki/Google 

Reverted adding SEO spam POI with advertising/malformed tags and source=* of Google Maps, in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/185907754
JBacc1 (2026-07-17 18:19:45+00:00): Salut Lejun,
Merci pour la correction, tu es allé bien au-delà de ce que j'espérais (j'avais fait le minimum en itinérance). Pas sûr pour le "fast-food", il y avait plus à boire et des glaces que réellement à manger, à mon souvenir, mais ça me va aussi (et de l'eau à 4€ le litre).
Lejun (2026-07-18 05:23:18+00:00): Un plaisir de pouvoir aider !
C'est vrai que le fast-food est audacieux. Mais je me suis basé sur ce qui semble être la carte[1] qui n'a pas à rougir face à d'autres établissements. Elle correspond à celle que t'as vu sur place ?

À l'occasion faudra que j'aille y faire un tour avec mon matériel Panoramax.

[1] https://www.station-metabief.com/en/page/comptoirdumorond
JBacc1 (2026-07-18 20:38:24+00:00): Effectivement, la carte peut justifier le fast-food. J'y suis passé l'après-midi, ça ressemblait plus à une buvette, mais l'ambiance est peut-être différente à midi.
J'ai été agréablement surpris par le nombre de commerces renseignés localement. Je vais ajouter quelques éléments le long de ma rando dans les prochains jours.
fernando_htx (2026-07-17 18:20:34+00:00): Hi, I am Fernando Alfonso, the Texas editor for the New York Times based in Houston (fernando.alfonso@nytimes.com). I am working on a story on the anti Flock sentiment washing over Texas and was hoping we could connect. Can we email?
mpja69 (2026-07-17 13:52:17+00:00): The comment should have said hole 5, (not hole 3).
9142322 (2026-07-17 15:05:05+00:00): Cleaned duplicated objects from export changeset/185911170
archpdx (2026-07-18 04:08:37+00:00): Hello, I noticed that this changeset removes the building that used to house Big Lots. If this has been demolished, I recommend mapping it as `demolished:building=yes` to prevent other mappers from mistakenly mapping it again since it's still visible in aerial imagery
9142322 (2026-07-18 14:23:17+00:00): Hello, thank you for bringing this to my attention. I did not know I had deleted the building at 18565 SW TV Hwy. It is currently vacant, I will try and restore it immediately
FajrAl (2026-07-17 14:37:18+00:00): I have left comments regarding your buildings mapping, please take a moment to review them. You should not map multiple building that actually can be just one building.
BerryTrails (2026-07-22 13:25:37+00:00): Hi da7282, I noticed that some of your classification changes are incorrect and are causing issues. Could you please review them before making changes? Also, I observed that you're changing ways to links, but in these cases they are not links. Please avoid making those changes unless you're certain they are correct.
maxzp (2026-07-18 02:34:05+00:00): You did not correct the opening hours. The opening hours currently listed on the website are not the actual opening hours.
dvdhoven (2026-07-17 15:05:10+00:00): rwn_ref 87 was een eindje de zijweg opgeschoven, die heb ik terug gelegd naar het echte afslagpunt. Ook een raar stukje untagged way verwijderd

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
MyOSMaccount (2026-07-17 18:13:22+00:00): Dankjewel Dick. Hoe kan het toch dat jij dit soort 'nevenschade' zo snel doorhebt?
Het is af en toe zo rommelig daar in de duinen dat ik onbedoeld wel eens wat stuk maak. 😁
Ik heb het idee dat het stukje bij beetje wel beter wordt.
dvdhoven (2026-07-18 08:57:44+00:00): Ik kijk op knooppuntnet.nl https://knooppuntnet.nl/nl/analysis/overview
Die wordt om de paar minuten bij gewerkt
FajrAl (2026-07-22 12:05:05+00:00): Tip: use Simplify Tool (Shift + Y) on JOSM
Syl (2026-07-17 17:11:48+00:00): Bonjour, je n'ai pas trouvé de source qui indiquerais que la chapelle est toujours en activité. C'est sûr que c'est toujours un lieu de culte ?
Sur la plage il n'y a pas l'air d'y avoir d’aménagement. Est-ce que natural=beach ne serait pas plus adapté que leisure=beach_resort ?
gsimon (2026-07-17 17:55:21+00:00): Bonjour. Oui effectivement tu as raison. Je ne suis plus devant mon ordinateur, peux-tu corriger ? Sinon je corrigerai semaine prochaine. Merci pour ta vigilance
eggie (2026-07-17 15:07:16+00:00): Dag XiPHiAS

Geef svp concreet aan wat je hebt aangepast. 

Probeer het gebied van je edits klein te houden.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-07-17 15:09:02+00:00): Svp.. Niet name= gebruiken om iets te beschrijven.. leisure=pitch sport=?  moet het doen.
Dus niet name=sportveld..  voetbalveld, We taggen ook niet name=bankje, boom.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-07-17 15:24:29+00:00): Ahh.. Je hebt de grens van het gebied denk ik onbewust bewerkt.
Dan lijkt je edit groter.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=185909513
Lê Tuấn Minh (2026-07-26 16:09:49+00:00): Mình thấy QL32C đoạn mới đã được làm thành đường đôi, có dải phân cách, kết nối Việt Trì với khu vực Cầu Phong Châu. Vì sao đoạn này được phân loại secondary trong khi một số tuyến có vai trò kết nối thấp hơn như đoạn QL.32C cũ từ ngã ba Đền Hùng hay đường đê sông Hồng QL2D gần đó lại là primary vậy?
Joel Koen (2026-07-18 06:43:00+00:00): Reverted in changeset/185941779: you appear to have accidentally moved a road, please check your changes before uploading.
fortera_au (2026-07-20 00:40:34+00:00): Also, the brand change is incorrect, 7-Eleven Australia is separate from the US one.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185909575
4004 (2026-07-19 23:54:41+00:00): странно, что оно отделено от остальных участков было. если не включили в границы деревни официально, оставляем участки
Vladisl0ve (2026-07-20 16:35:20+00:00): Здравствуйте! Спасибо, что оперативно заметили правку! Рад что разобрались.
alpacaMaps (2026-07-19 03:20:27+00:00): This changeset adds one or more surveillance cameras in a spot that looks unlikely — the nodes sit well away from any road, which usually means the cameras aren't physically present on the ground while also being duplicated thrice over.

If these cameras are real, please let us know so the map stays accurate. Otherwise, we'd kindly ask that you avoid adding cameras that aren't actually there, and that you remove any temporary or test nodes once you're done.

If this was simply a mistake, no problem at all — just clean up the nodes that don't correspond to a real-world camera, and leave a quick note here so we can help.

Thanks for helping keep OpenStreetMap accurate.

— alpacaMaps
eggie (2026-07-17 15:05:14+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
nevw (2026-07-19 00:17:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185984014#map=18/-28.757855/114.627306 due to shifted roads, etc.
MarinoBM (2026-07-19 01:00:01+00:00): Hola Ufones de Aliste: has cambiado de forma errónea la clasificación de estas carreteras. Los criterios para su clasificación están recogidos en las Directrices de etiquetado para Castilla y León
Red Complementaria Local: highway=tertiary
osm.wiki/ES:Directrices_de_etiquetado_espa%C3%B1olas#Castilla_y_Le%C3%B3n
Este conjunto de cambios ha sido revertido.
Un saludo

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185985055
Solaris07 (2026-07-18 12:36:18+00:00): Hey, you appear to have messed up quite a few roads here.
nevw (2026-07-19 00:15:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185984014#map=18/-28.757855/114.627306
nevw (2026-07-19 00:16:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185984014#map=18/-28.757855/114.627306
due to shifted roads, etc.
MassCartog (2026-07-17 23:13:59+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM. Please don't remove the building outlines unless the building has been demolished. Just remove old tags from the building and add a node if that's you are trying to do.
pitscheplatsch (2026-07-18 07:22:57+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OSM. 

Node 3188701907 was already part of the highway=service way 312953362. The accommodation and the road are separate features and should be mapped as separate OSM elements.

Please restore this node as an untagged road geometry node, then create a new node or area at the exact location of the mobile home.

The accommodation also needs a main feature tag, such as tourism=chalet, and possibly building=static_caravan if you map its outline. name=Location de vacances is a generic description rather than a proper name. The proper name should go in name=*, for example name=BluePortel Prestige, provided that this can be verified.

Could you please correct your map edits?
jayaddison (2026-07-22 09:18:17+00:00): Thank you for mapping this charging station
Udarian (2026-07-17 16:22:25+00:00): looking at this ALPR on the latest aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within with the area of a parking space, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it.

Happy mapping,
Udar.
FajrAl (2026-07-18 15:38:37+00:00): Memang bangunannya sudah tidak ada?
Udarian (2026-07-17 16:23:04+00:00): looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it.

Happy mapping,
Udar.
confusedbuffalo (2026-07-18 12:09:26+00:00): Thanks for adding these, they look neat and line up well. I just noticed your building type for terraces though. Use building=terrace "row of terraced houses" for a whole row and building=house, house=terraced, "terraced house" for individual houses, which is how you've done them and how it's best to do them
Thanks and happy mapping!
Joel Koen (2026-07-18 06:27:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted (changeset/185941344).

This is not a train station (ie public transport).

Please add a comment to your changesets - you can include more than one change before saving your work, and even something like "updated business details" would be better than nothing.
SekeRob (2026-07-18 10:23:23+00:00): Hi mapperrroney

Always thought that charging point was for the single socket position and charging station was for the whole. Just asking because you tagged Atlante with capacity 8 and Ewiwa with capacity 4 as charging point.

BTW, a very big bounding box for those few edits. Splitting would be good per site.

Happy Mapping
SekeRob
Mapperooney (2026-07-18 10:46:15+00:00): Thanks SekeRob, I will fix that Ewiwa station.
PierZen (2026-07-20 20:51:23+00:00): Tel que déja indiqué sur changeset 185415336, vous modifiez systèmatiquement pour imposer classification waterway=flowline alors que la communauté n'a pas approuvé cette classification. Vous devez cesser de telles modifications en attendant d'en disucter avec la communauté.
Viajero Perdido (2026-07-21 01:32:22+00:00): Are we, as mappers, expected to do a deep-research of all discussion that might've influenced the wiki, before relying on the info there?  At this moment, the wiki suggests flowline is legal, though it seems an edit war is starting.  Your warning note got shunted to the side.

Don't discourage mappers (not just AG!) by reverting changes done in good faith by following the wiki rules-of-the-day.

PS, as a community member, I support waterway=flowline. Record my vote however you do that, please.
PierZen (2026-07-21 02:08:42+00:00): Notez que c'est ce contributeur qui modifie les réalisations des autres contributeurs, non l'inverse. Si vous voulez discuter de la classication, voir https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/should-river-lines-be-mapped-through-lakes-estuaries-gulfs-and-other-large-water-bodies/104438
Arctic gnome (2026-07-21 14:48:10+00:00): If I was reverting your edits, I didn't notice; I was merely adding flowlines where they would fit. I meant no offence and was not trying to start an edit war. My apologies.
Viajero Perdido (2026-07-21 14:58:53+00:00): Nothing of mine was reverted, AFAIK. It was just a pre-emptive concern.
eggie (2026-07-18 08:46:45+00:00): Hoi.. Dat duurt wel lang.. construction zou kunnen.. andere manier is op datum.
Bv 
access:conditional=no @ (2025 Sep 20-2026 Apr 03)
raymondnijssen (2026-07-18 15:14:28+00:00): Uiteindelijk wordt alles weer zoals het was. Er komt een trillingsscherm van 18m diep in de groend, daarom duurt het zo lang. Er zijn ook tijdelijke wegen aangelegd, maar het belangrijkst is dat er geen verkeer van noord naar zuid langs het spoor kan en dat de knik in de Parallelweg voor auto's is gesloten (met betonblokken)
raymondnijssen (2026-07-18 15:16:34+00:00): En ik woon er vlak naast dus als het weer open ("omstreeks april 2027") is pas ik het wel weer aan. Dank voor je reactie!
eggie (2026-07-18 15:17:40+00:00): Oke... dan svp wel in de gaten houden. Zodra het opgeleverd is de tagging s p terugzetten.
Groet,
eggie
eggie (2026-07-18 15:18:06+00:00): 👍