piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Exe19 (2025-03-14 10:47:38+00:00): Czemu usunąłęś obszar residentiala z Szybu Bartosza? Jest on wyraźnie widoczny w BDOTcie i w terenie (Ortofotamapa się myli!)?
NorthCrab_upload (2025-02-26 21:11:06+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12621299594

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-05 17:15:48+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1265477542/history has power = 400 that was added in this edit
What this tag means? Numeric value is unexpected here and it is unclear what it means
NieWnen (2025-02-26 22:49:23+00:00): Tam gdzie jest sygnalizacja, to na liniowych raczej by pasowało bardziej crossing=traffic_signals, a nie crossing=uncontrolled :P
NieWnen (2025-02-26 22:51:36+00:00): W takim przypadku crossing:island=yes jest niepoprawne

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/410546180

crossing:island=yes można dać na węźle w przypadku braku rozdzielnia drogi, tutaj więcej info:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing:island
KhalidKashmiri (2025-02-26 23:16:03+00:00): Faktycznie, dzięki za info. Jutro będę poprawiał
opendcc (2025-03-28 10:46:44+00:00): Line  1363161273 hat keine Tags ...
dumbo (2025-03-28 10:55:59+00:00): right, i deleted the line or path (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164201895)
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-27 06:01:40+00:00): Hi mkmitchell,

I hope you're doing well! I was just curious about the data you've mapped. I'm having a bit of trouble understanding the tags used – could you share more details?

Thanks so much.
mkmitchell (2025-02-27 13:39:45+00:00): Absolutely!  I just found out I should first reach out to the community before importing data like this.  I'll be doing that shortly.  These are Marsh terraces and some more information about them can be found at https://www.ducks.org/conservation/where-ducks-unlimited-works/gulf-coastal-prairie/marsh-terraces-as-a-conservation-practice

In short they are built in an attempt to capture sediment and increase vegetation growth to increase marsh accretion. We want to keep marsh there and reduce subsidence.

These are constructed by excavating the marsh soil and piling it up in the lines that you may see in the imagery.  Once piled up crews will plant marsh specific vegetation on them.

We were adding the dataset with a year_of_construction tag to provide data to potential users for research purposes.  Do these help marsh growth? How long does it take? What form factor seems to work best?  Does juxtaposition within open water matter?

It's extremely difficult to classify open water or land in this area because wetlands change so rapidly.  A change in the tide between two images could drastically change a users perspective on what is under water and what is not.  This is why we decided on linear features instead of enclosed.

Thank you for looking and reviewing.  I appreciate it.
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-28 14:55:38+00:00): I think it would be best if you present your project in the OSM forum and post your questions there: https://community.openstreetmap.org/

Unfortunately, I can't assist you in detail here.
silversurfer83 (2025-02-27 07:38:44+00:00): Moin :)

Du hast darum gebeten, dass sich jemand diese Änderung ansieht.
Bevor wir ins Detail gehen können: Ist denn an dieser Stelle noch irgendetwas von Interesse?

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162989316
27Fletch4203 (2025-02-26 23:20:08+00:00): I Was Just doing what forsyth and christies would look like if extended to boundary road :(
27Fletch4203 (2025-02-26 23:22:33+00:00): Come on man!
fortera_au (2025-02-26 23:48:04+00:00): You had drawn it as if it was a real, functioning road. If it is planned (which I haven't been able to find any proof of so far) then there are suitable ways to tag this, however this generally wouldn't happen until construction has started and it's obvious where the road is going to be.
InfernoOSM (2025-02-27 10:52:00+00:00): One of my extended family members owns the large block of land north of Woodbury estate, and I am pretty sure it hasn't even been sold yet, let alone subdivided and planned. The extension of Forsyth Road is unlikely to happen until at least a year or so after they sell it anyways.
Tinetto (2025-04-24 11:10:24+00:00): Hello Thartek
Thank you for your contribution. While editing duplicated highway, make sure to align relations and connect isolated highways. Happy Mapping!
eggie (2025-02-26 21:52:51+00:00): Moet zijn.. Enka terrein aangepast
Xvtn (2025-03-16 17:56:43+00:00): Is it open as of now?
Sytys (2025-03-16 20:28:00+00:00): Under construction
Xvtn (2025-03-16 21:27:24+00:00): Roger. Updated tags.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-08-31 12:26:48+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12621382424/history has shop = restaurant that was added in this edit
shop=restaurant ? Is it a mistagged restaurant? Maybe it should be https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Drestaurant ? Is it a place selling restaurant equipment (in such case shop=trade trade=restaurant_equipment would be likely better and more clear) ? Something else?
mueschel (2025-02-28 11:33:25+00:00): Hi,
I tried to find out if there is a way to put all the opening hours into one tag but got a bit confused. 

It seems like the times you added for Jul-Aug are valid only on a few days, because the rest of the two month would be covered by school holidays. Or are the Jul-Aug times valid for the whole time and the "SH" times don't apply during summer holidays?
Agaric (2025-03-04 21:26:19+00:00): En France, il y a les vacances estivales qui ont des dates assez immuables (juillet-août) et les vacances scolaires qui changent d'une année sur l'autre.

Le souci c'est que l'information sur les autres prend trop de caractères (plus que les 255 autorisés).
mueschel (2025-03-05 21:18:29+00:00): I think I managed:

https://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/?EXP=Tu-Fr%2012%3A00-13%3A45%2C16%3A30-19%3A30%2CTu%2CFr%2019%3A30-21%3A30%2CWe%2013%3A45-16%3A30%2CSH%20Mo%2012%3A00-19%3A30%2CSH%2013%3A45-16%3A30%2CSu%2CPH%2010%3A00-19%3A00%2CSa%2014%3A30-19%3A00%2CJul-Aug%20SH%20Tu-Su%2010%3A00-14%3A30%2CJul-Aug%20SH%2019%3A00-20%3A00%2CJul-Aug%20SH%20Tu%2CFr%2021%3A30-21%3A45%3BSa-Su%2013%3A00-14%3A30%20off%3BPH%2013%3A00-14%3A30%20off&lat=48.7769&lon=1.1844&mode=0&DATE=1707856140000

Could you check that for any (very possible) mistakes?
There is a problem with holiday definitions in May 2025, so better check it in 2024 :)
Nate Wessel (2025-06-16 12:18:08+00:00): This was already mapped [here](https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12512826096) in the correct location. I'll move the non-duplicated tags over and delete this node.
Alliegaytor (2025-03-04 06:48:19+00:00): 
Hi giarcnomis,

Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap.

I reverted this changeset as well as the following ones you made in this area (163142614, 163139129, 163139008, 162990332, 162990275) as I believe that the intersection wasn't mapped properly. It had a missing piece of highway, had each unseparated turn lane mapped, and broke the following bus route relations:

902, 901, 477, 953, 532, 959

My changeset which I reverted your changes: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163187869

A note I opened about the issue a few days ago (sorry I didn't comment here then, I was busy and must have forgotten to): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/464481

I do think that the intersection can be improved by adding the two one ways that the buses use, but the individual turn lanes needn't be mapped.

I made sure to only revert the changesets to do with this intersection, if someone else got removed I'm sorry, it can be readded. I wanted to make sure I didn't break things more.
Sandal man (2025-09-09 12:18:54+00:00): ¿No debería ser "Balcó de Xàbia"?
https://visor.gva.es/visor/?extension=707663%2C4265421%2C801906%2C4309640&nivelZoom=11&capasids=Imagen%3B&tcapas=1.0&idioma=va
Y loc_name=Balcón al Mar https://www.inmovillasjavea.com/acerca-de-javea/urbanizaciones-en-javea/urbanizacion-balcon-al-mar-javea
Jordi MF (2025-09-09 13:58:05+00:00): Hola Sandal man,

Tens raó. Vaig editar el node, però no recorde per què (crec que va ser per a canviar de suburb > neigbourhood). No vaig revisar els noms en l'AVL. He utilitzat les etiquetes que has dit: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/258341562

Salutacions!
Sandal man (2025-09-09 14:48:52+00:00): Ho acabo de trobar per casualitat
Salutacions!
Brummelwuff (2025-02-27 08:03:18+00:00): Ist es sinnvoll mehrere amenity=polling_station übereinander zu packen? Mach das bearbeiten schwierig und sie befinden sich ja auch nicht im gleichen Raum.
ChrissW-R1 (2025-02-27 23:18:27+00:00): Ja, das ist soweit korrekt.
Leider habe ich aktuell nicht genauere Positionsinformationen vorliegen. Der Plan ist aber die Positionen noch nach den Räumen aufzutrennen.

Hier ist das bereits geschehen:
https://osm.org/node/12613926137
https://osm.org/node/7826160204
https://osm.org/node/12613926136

Im ersten Schritt verfahre ich erstmal nach dem Verfahren OFOO:
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
ChrissW-R1 (2025-02-27 23:27:03+00:00): PS.: Falls du an irgendeiner Stelle genauere Infos hast, dann kannst du gerne die Räume verschieben, auch wenn es nur grob ist.
pardalote (2025-03-11 18:27:56+00:00): Hi NP02 and welcome to OSM. It looks like this edit moved an unrelated sidewalk causing many intersections. Would you mind fixing it?
eggie (2025-02-27 08:08:20+00:00): Dag Lean   De Sluisweg zelf zal geen highway=service zijn. 
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=162990551
Ik zet de straat weer terug naar residential.

MVG
eggie
fgouget (2025-02-26 22:38:25+00:00): Bonjour,

Je ne vois pas le trottoir suivant sur les photo aériennes de 20235. Est-ce un nouveau trottoir ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1303884219

(ref note 4605372)

Cordialement,
opendcc (2025-04-04 21:07:52+00:00): reverted
eggie (2025-02-27 07:56:47+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  Lijkt me oke. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
esmenard (2025-03-01 17:46:50+00:00): Bonjour, ces navettes font partie du réseau Paris-Saclay Mobilités qui est distinct du réseau Paris-Saclay (cf site IDFM), merci de ne pas modifier la valeur de network
fortera_au (2025-02-27 00:18:53+00:00): What would make this road a tertiary road, considering it's just a small section leading nowhere? You've also made the _link roads a normal tertiary road, which is wrong, they should remain trunk_link regardless of how Forsyth Road is classified, as they should correspond to the highest classification they're connected to.
InfernoOSM (2025-02-27 10:53:19+00:00): This section of road will likely be upgraded in the future once it is extended, but I don't see that happening within the next couple years.
Anas masuris (2025-02-27 12:14:40+00:00): Och jak ładnie! Jeśli masz PZT pod ręką, to byłoby fajnie jeszcze dorysować ścieżki przy przystanku autobusowym. Plus jeszcze od strony rampy są krzewy (ogródek) wzdłuż drogi przy Tunelowej
tomzyl (2025-02-27 12:28:56+00:00): W "trawniki" się nie wgryzałem, ale będę rysował. Najtrudniej, że wszędzie jeszcze jest plac budowy, któy dobrze byłoby powywalać i pomyśleć gdzie powinien być obszar kolejowy.
Anas masuris (2025-02-27 12:35:20+00:00): Osobiście wolę delimitować obszar kolejowy na płotach i budynkach tj. jest poprowadzone ogrodzenie przy kładce i północno-zachodnich częściach Tunelowej. Plus ew. w miejscach spadków terenu (krawędzie nasypów, granice rowów melioracyjnych), gdy nie ma tam płotu. Taka jest moja sugestia.
Sylabowy Kot (2025-02-28 09:15:30+00:00): Dzięki za dokończenie roboty z zielenią i resztą zagospodarowania terenu :D Jakoś w końcu nie siadłem by dorysować tego co zapomniałem wcześniej (przeszło 2 miesiące temu). 
Co do sugestii Anas masuris - widzę, że parę lat temu były dylematy jak mappować obszar wokół Centralnej: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/warszawa-centralna/95956
Idąc tym tropem, ja bym rozszerzył obszar terenu kolejowego co najmniej do okolic klubu Dwa Koła.
Tu niestety prędko nie powstanie nowa zabudowa, żeby Tunelowa służyła publicznie do czegoś innego niż do komunikacji z Dworcem.
tomzyl (2025-02-28 14:26:09+00:00): Jeszcze będę konczył trawnikopodobne twory, co do kolejówki chyba będzie już ok.
Sylabowy Kot (2025-02-28 15:51:57+00:00): Dodałem parę rzeczy, w tym zmieniłem railway tak jak napisałem :P https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163049670
Widzę, że też się powołujesz na Awizonosza. Przy następnej edycji chyba jednak wypadało by przywrócić construction na terenie na zachód od ogrodzenia, bo widać na jego ostatnim nagraniu, że coś tam jeszcze grzebią. Nie wiem, w którym rozdziale dokumentacji projektowej jest opisane zagospodarowanie tego terenu. Z kolei lokalizacje trójkątów na pewno trzeba się skorektorować, ale chyba wchodzą na teren który pojawi się w BDOT po zakończeniu wszystkich robót? Część jest widoczna na mapach Bing.
tomzyl (2025-02-28 16:03:25+00:00): projekt mam aktualny akurat ;) plac dla torów odstawczych jeszcze szykują - w edycji widać krawężniki. Trójkąty korygowałem pod projekt.
Sylabowy Kot (2025-02-28 16:13:01+00:00): Na ja wywaliłem drugi trójkąt przy ukośnym parkingu, bo go na nagraniu nie było :(
tomzyl (2025-02-28 16:20:02+00:00): pewnie nie tylko to się jeszcze różni, ale ciężko tak na 2 ekrany.
FajrAl (2025-04-02 13:43:19+00:00): "villa" in Indonesia is tourism=chalet
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-27 06:03:59+00:00): Hi mkmitchell,

I hope you're doing well! I was just curious about the data you've mapped. May we know the source of the addresses?

Thanks so much.
NeatNit (2025-02-28 21:35:37+00:00): This area has a lot of Arabic labels in OSM Carto, what's up with that? Do the need to be changed to Hebrew as well?

There are two bus stops that you moved in this changeset and removed the name tag entirely:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5210715300/history/5
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5210715304/history/8

Was that intentional or a mistake?
SafwatHalaby (2025-03-01 18:36:20+00:00): The name removal and bus stop displacement was an editing error. Thanks for pointing it out! Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163086510

As for the mix of Arabic and Hebrew `name` tags, this is intended. The place is rather multilingual. For example, some shops have a prominent Hebrew name on the sign and a secondary Arabic name or none at all, and some vice versa.

I physically survey the place and I choose the name tag according to what's the primary name on the sign, or, if that's missing, based on what's likely the local preference.

As for Carto's handling of that, here's a relevant reference: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
 
Basically, I don't really take Carto into account when tagging the names. I personally think there should be a separate Carto for each language. Vanilla Carto has always been confusing for multilingual places such as Israel, where language switches depending on the city you're looking at.
NeatNit (2025-03-01 19:05:08+00:00): Yeah, I was just using Carto as a shortcut for the name tag basically. Just wanted to make sure this was your intention, so all is good. Really the reason I commented at all was the two displaced stops, so thank you for fixing that.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-02-26 23:51:00+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12621494527

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
pardalote (2025-03-10 01:09:15+00:00): Area not blocked off yet as of March 9
Frans S (2025-02-27 10:06:55+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
You tag buildings wrongly.
Just building=yes.  (no area=yes)
and, don't forget to square the rectangular buildings.
Best regards
MerlinPendragon (2025-02-27 08:44:34+00:00): As of 2025 imagery, it looks like this building is still standing. A building to the south (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/459234443) was demolished in 2024. Is that the one you meant to remove?
opendcc (2025-04-04 04:05:45+00:00): review, großteils reverted
tastrax (2025-02-27 04:39:48+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, +61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features#Phone_Numbers .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
rskedgell (2025-02-27 13:11:31+00:00): If you split a road around an island, you need to add oneway=yes to the new segments. You also need to ensure that the direction in which the way is drawn is correct (the iD editor has a reverse function).

Although this is not the case here, you also need to ensure that any other tags relating to lanes, sidewalks, cycleways, parking and verges are updated to reflect the newly split carriageway's features.

Tags added in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163011938
NM$L (2025-02-27 15:01:38+00:00): 为啥不沿山脊线了？有来源吗
eerib (2025-02-27 02:31:36+00:00): *Northeast Face (climbing route)
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2025-03-04 04:39:58+00:00): 名字可能有一点过于古怪了，最好还是给一下实地的证据证明一下这个名字真的是common used，目前OSM上似乎有一个叫做“名门悦峰”的名字看上去置信度高一些。

当然这都是我armchair mapping的结论，具体什么情况还得当地人说了算。
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162994985
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2025-03-04 04:38:05+00:00): 河南省农业科学院官网显示的地址依然是 郑州市花园路116号

https://www.hnagri.org.cn/
可见于此
不知道您为什么会得出这个地方改名叫科技中心的结论
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162995006
pwbriggs (2025-02-28 06:28:05+00:00): Thanks for the contribution.

Usually a survey:date isn't needed, but if you want one, I assume you meant 2025, not 2024!

Thanks again, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
NieWnen (2025-02-27 20:12:32+00:00): Dzięki za poprawki!
LordGarySugar (2025-02-27 03:22:09+00:00): Hi, I have reverted your changes in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162995670.
The name you added to the house was clearly wrong, and the sidewalk was not connected to anything and didn't need to be named sidewalk. You also added a bread vending machine. You are welcome to contribute to the map, but don't make things up.
LordGarySugar (2025-02-28 01:52:09+00:00): Hi, thanks for adding your village! I have changed the name from being uppercase to 'Silhauri'. If you know the name of any other nearby villages, schools or shops, it would be great if you could add them!
ArchangelEkim (2025-04-28 06:18:29+00:00): The building that is now completed on the north-east corner of mona vale and killeaton st is an aged care residence. https://www.thompsonhealthcare.com.au/our-homes/st-ives-house/
b-jazz (2025-02-27 03:43:07+00:00): Hi golfboy,

Why did you add a second, nearly identical green here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1363208624 ?

Also, you put two fairway areas next to each other. These should be a single object and the fairway/green should be combined/merged into a multipolygon. Check out the wiki at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course for how to properly map these together. Let me know if you have any questions.
MatiMatix (2025-02-27 04:56:52+00:00): datę*
Supaplex (2025-03-12 06:36:31+00:00): 請與社群溝通並且依照慣用的標籤方式與繪製形式，別道路沾黏土地利用，POI沾到人行道，以及別自創並不存在或是舊制戶政系統的地名。
別講得你受害，這只是社群依照討論共識去修正你的編輯成果而修改成符合慣例的繪製方式與標籤。
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162996599
5m4u9 (2025-02-27 17:21:57+00:00): hola, bienvenid@ gracias por mejorar el mapa.

Restituí al nombre original, porque los nombres son nombres y no descripciones.

Puse en la descripción lo que indicas con referencia a vos como extrabajador.
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-28 20:35:25+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162997439
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-28 20:35:49+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162997439
mavl (2025-05-13 15:05:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-28 20:36:42+00:00): Partly reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162997439
eggie (2025-06-17 10:12:10+00:00): Dag AMB  Ik vraag me af of je hier wel bekend bent?
De montesorilaan had je afgesloten voor tweewielers bij de 'bussluis.
De achtergrondfoto BING is volkomen verouderd. Gebruik svp PDOK ortho 2025.
Zaken die ik nauwkeurig heb bijgehouden als lokale mapper heb je allemaal weer teruggedraaid.
Ingang Weizigtpark. De zuidelijke ingang van het station draai je allemaal weer terug. Je zou naar de datum kunnen kijken van de laatste aanpassing en dan contact met mij opnemen. 
Er verandert wel eens wat... Svp graag wat voorzichtiger met aanpassingen.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-06-17 10:13:34+00:00): Hi AMB I wonder if you are familiar with this?
You closed the Montesorilaan for two-wheelers at the 'bus lock'.
The background photo BING is completely outdated. Please use PDOK ortho 2025.
You have reversed all the things that I have kept track of carefully as a local mapper.
Entrance Weizigtpark. You reverse all the southern entrance of the station. You could look at the date of the last adjustment and then contact me.
Things do change sometimes... Please be a bit more careful with adjustments.
Greetz,
eggie
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-18 08:18:53+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/253618031/history has tracktype = 4 that was added in this edit
Maybe it was supposed to be tracktype=grade4 ? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Atracktype
urbalazs (2025-02-27 07:42:02+00:00): Ez már Sárszentmihály, nem Székesfehérvár. A Mezei utca a határ.
user_5359 (2025-06-06 07:05:37+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/12622302996 (part of a parking area https://www.osm.org/way/1363238908). What is the mean of the tag node = 11048916366? You create this node 21 month before.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-17 00:42:51+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165050151
hatul (2026-07-08 10:15:18+00:00): בבקשה לא לנקד, ראה את הדיון כאן
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/hebrew-with-niqqud-diacritics/143158
Kri_ttt (2025-02-27 06:42:30+00:00): https://ratchakitcha.soc.go.th/documents/61846.pdf
rskedgell (2025-02-27 12:01:27+00:00): Tagging for the renderer isn't "fixing" anything, particularly when you don't update the affected tags correctly. If there isn't physical separation between lanes in the real world, they shouldn't be mapped as separate ways in OSM.

I'm pretty sure I knew what I was doing when I remodeled this junction and do not appreciate having my work undone just to make it look prettier in OSM Carto.

Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163009296
Fizzie-DWG (2025-02-27 11:42:15+00:00): Hi. Why are you mapping on 2 different continents under the same HOT project?
Herman Lee (2025-02-28 18:31:50+00:00): 您好，这个修改集中进行了奇怪的更改，请注意！
Herman Lee (2025-02-28 18:36:50+00:00): 暂时退回此修改集