piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
jeslop (2023-06-03 11:56:41+00:00): Hola Autopistero20502020. Según las normas de OSM el artículo de la wikipedia en este caso debe ir en el de la comunidad donde se encuentra. No veo ninguna razón por la que Wikipedia español tenga prioridad sobre la Wikipedia galego.

Lo cambio y te pediría que no lo vuelvas a cambiar unilateralmente.

Saludos.

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
jeslop (2023-06-03 11:59:23+00:00): Reverted on changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136899657

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
Autopistero20502020 (2023-06-03 17:10:08+00:00): Hola, Jesús:

Entiendo, veo que las normas de OSM sobre Wikipedia, pero, ¿no se puede poner una segunda función para Wikipedia español?

Es que este acceso esta en Galicia, al igual de la autopista del Atlántico, AP-9, aunque es de la competencia del Estado español y no de la Xunta de Galicia. Sé que en el Wikipedia galego tiene el articulo creado sobre esta autopista, al igual de Wikipedia español y allí esta el lío.

Gracias y un saludo.
Cebderby (2023-06-27 10:14:29+00:00): Please be careful when moving the map. Fixed one dragged node.
マップ移動の際はご注意ください。 ドラッグされた 1 つのノードを修正しました。
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=136894579
JayTurnr (2024-07-08 14:42:50+00:00): Hi, you removed an `area=yes` tag from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/912976671 - this is a highway area, and iD incorrectly recommends removing it. I've just fixed this, but please be careful accepting the upgrades that iD suggests as sometimes I can be wrong
Stalker61 (2023-06-04 17:56:20+00:00): Как мапить уклон написано здесь:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:incline
И описание дорога в гору не надо пихать в тег name
Enock4seth (2023-06-03 19:25:06+00:00): Thanks for mapping! :) The name of the Over The Counter Medicine Seller (OTMCS) isn't OTMCS, you might want to use the full name here say Ama Ghana OTMCS or Ama Ghana Chemical Shop as on their signposts, I don't recommend abbreviations in names though.

Happy mapping!
*Martin* (2023-06-04 11:17:49+00:00): Ahoj. Prosim nemaz existujuce veci v terene reflektovane v mape. Takto sa ochrana nerobi.
*Martin* (2023-06-04 11:31:54+00:00): Na druhu stranu rozumiem, ze taketo zmapovanie moze prilakat aj ludi s nekalym umyslom. Jaskyna s takouto krasovou vyzdobou by mala byt podla mojho nazoru zamrezovana. Ak to viete zariadit, viem ju na par mesiacov odstranit z mapy, kym sa to nezrealizuje. Ale hociaky iny mapper to tam moze znova pridat ked to objavi.
user_19461709 (2023-06-08 17:13:42+00:00): Jaskyne nie su otvorene ulice, uvedom si, ze zverejnenim ich pozicie do celeho bez predchadzajucej konzultacie s jaskyniarmi, ktori v nej posobia roki s nasadenim zivota, dehonestujes ich pracu.
*Martin* (2023-06-08 17:20:19+00:00): Viud. moj komentar na https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137067382

Ja len nepochopim, ze jaskyniari netusili ze raz pridu technicke moznosti na objavenie jaskyn (napr LIDAR) a vopred nezabezpecovali tieto jaskyne technickymi prostriedkami (mreze, IoT LPWAN / GSM senzorickymi alarmami a pod.). Podla ma to mama byt ich priorita. Ale asi su to len jaskyniari a nie ochranari. A s ochranarmi to mohli minimalne diskutovat.
user_19461709 (2023-06-08 17:27:14+00:00): Ty navrhujes zamrezovat vsetky jaskyne? Mas vobec ponatia, co sposobujes zverejnenim ich pozicie do celeho sveta?
*Martin* (2023-06-08 17:32:42+00:00): Nenavrhujem konkretne zamrezovanie a nemam ponatie co sposobujem. Len viem, ze tie zaujimave su zamrezovane.

Ak by aj tie jaskyne zmizli v mape, technologicky su dnes uz relativne lahko objavitelne (LIDAR) a kto si da viac namahy, (tj. ma nejaky silny motiv ich najst) tak to spravi.

Rozumiem vasej obave.
user_19461709 (2023-06-08 17:43:47+00:00): Pozri, ja nemam nic proti tomu, ked ludia s laskou k prirode objavuju a obdivuju jaskyne. V ziadnom pripade niesom za to, aby boli vsetky zamrezovane a normalni ludia ich nemohli slobodne preskumat a ulozit si zazitky na cely zivot. Problem v zverejnovani ich polohy celemu svetu naraz vsak znamena, ze nomozes mat tusenie, kto kazdy a s akym umyslom ich navstivi o hyperbolickom naraste potencialy vzrastu navstevnosti nehovoriac. Prosim ta pekne, zamysli sa a nezverejnuj bez rozmyslu vsetko, napriek tomu, ze je to sucast "reality". Jaskyne su posledne panenske miesta nasej prirody.
Frans S (2023-06-03 13:06:40+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
A: * Multiple buildings have been drawn as 1 building. Each building need to be mapped individually, without connecting nodes.
Hi rise buildings need to be placed on their footprint.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136896848
Dave Venables (2023-06-03 11:21:34+00:00): Thank you for correcting. My eyesight is not good enough for me to easily use Vespucci, on my phone, whilst walking past a shop and I could not tell the difference between ; and :
lipuma (2023-06-03 11:24:32+00:00): Haha, no worries! Glad to be able to help. Happy mapping~
NorthCrab_upload (2023-06-03 10:30:15+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2388469499
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10948686021

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
yannickx (2023-06-03 10:24:10+00:00): When I imported the GPS track, the extremities did not start or end on the intersections. 10-20m was missing. So I had to extrapolate to reach the intersections. I would try to redo a GPS track to check that the intersections are not too off.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-06-03 10:50:15+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/195986234
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/371906493
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1178545525

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/195984145

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Yakari (kleiner Indianer) (2023-06-06 12:48:34+00:00): Ona byla budova zbourána? Chybná byla proto, že byla plocha budovy zakreslena špatně, byla vepředu, což jsem dal i hlásit ČÚZK, který to pak opravil, takže se ten záznam může už odebrat.
eggie (2023-06-03 17:18:12+00:00): Hoi..

Merkwaardig.. het lijkt erop dat de BGT en de BAG er gewoon naast ligt.
Even er van uitgaande dat PDOK latest 2023 correct ligt.
Je zou eens een terugmelding kunnen doen richting BAG.
Groet
eggie
Zeruman (2023-09-27 10:45:03+00:00): Le passage à niveau est toujours ouvert, il était juste en travaux durant quelques jours.
b-holdet (2023-11-04 17:31:06+00:00): Hej mortenssande, kan se at der står en note om at man ikke må køre gennem denne vej
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2491337

Har du viden om det er en korrekt observation?

I så fald, så skal vejen have access=destination
mortenssande (2023-11-04 18:23:43+00:00): Hej b-holdet,
Der er et DK C22.1 skilt ved den østlige ende af Søhusevej (der hvor der er kryds med Gennem Bakkerne), og et til længere vestpå. Jeg kan desværre ikke huske placeringen af det vestlige skilt eller de præcise bemærkningerne på begge skilte. Det kan jeg lige tjekke næste gang jeg er i skoven.
b-holdet (2023-11-05 08:31:37+00:00): Det lyder rigtig godt!
Som jeg kan se af dine rettelser, så er det nok vejens beskaffenhed der gør, at man forbyder motorkørsel. Det er kun mit sofa-mapper-gæt. ;-)
NorthCrab_upload (2023-06-03 11:40:16+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/223370593
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/223370605

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
maraf24 (2023-06-03 16:39:10+00:00): Please stop using aerial imagery to map buildings. We don't map roofs.
These bulding have official countour availbable, didn't you notice this?
danvyr (2023-06-03 16:55:54+00:00): who we?
and why I can't use erial images?
I also was near that building today. I know how it looks
maraf24 (2023-06-03 17:07:35+00:00): We, OSM commnity, don't delineate building by their roofs. We are using contour at the ground.
Don't map building using aerials if perfect contour is available. And this is the case here for already built or almost bulit buildings.
maraf24 (2023-06-03 16:50:07+00:00): This is what I call "vandalism". You destroyed properly mapped building.
Now the geometry is terrible.
Look at this corner -https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10106469500 - where is the right angle ??? Shame!

If you wanted to accomodate for hanging parts of the building you should do it the right way - with preserving what other had correctly mapped before.
maraf24 (2023-06-03 16:53:55+00:00): Now fix it. Remember to use "Geoportal 2: Ewidencja budynków WMS" as a primary source.
maraf24 (2023-06-03 17:04:04+00:00): By "fix it" I mean - fix entire building. That one - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1178556830
Fix geometry, angles, remove otiose 3d relation. Add bulding:min_level for hanging parts. And mark these parts by creating another building:part areas.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-06-04 09:27:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 136925432 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a changeset by a vandal in Italy.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7166 , https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/odd-edits-in-italy/97706/58
maraf24 (2023-06-03 16:33:56+00:00): Bad buldings geometry, you are inventing how they look.
maraf24 (2023-06-03 16:43:57+00:00): Distorted bulding contour - very well visible even on aerial imagery.
Plus unnecessary 3D building relation - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:building
danvyr (2023-06-03 16:57:15+00:00): oh, great you found little mistake
it's open map - wanna better - do better
you did worse when reversed my edits
maraf24 (2023-06-03 17:12:43+00:00): You seem to not understand.
This building was already perfectly mapped. It wasn't a little mistake, but a big one. I'm guessing - you used Maxar? It's badly calibrated and outdated.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-06-03 12:35:07+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 135227577, 135227744, 135227793, 136119471.
Frans S (2023-06-06 10:01:12+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 
 Please be sure to square ALL rectangular buildings with the Q key. 
Don't you use the building plugin? Mapping with this plugin delivers always squared buildings.
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136901294
Andrea Musuruane (2023-06-03 13:45:23+00:00): Ciao Ivo, come mai hai eliminato il tag from da questa relazione? E' un errore?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136901343
Jrachi (2023-06-03 17:50:54+00:00): Ci puoi scommettere!
Pikse (2023-07-07 12:48:48+00:00): landcover=grass ei ole vananenud. Seda lihtsalt ei kuvata osm.org-is (mis iseenesest tundub mõistlik, kuniks pole välja mõeldud head moodust kattuva maakatte ja maakasutuse kaardil eristamiseks). Nüüd on jälle pandud lihtsalt kaks maakasutust (park ja muru) segasel moel kattuma ning osm.org-i legendi järgi on siin murulappide vahel kitsad pargiribad. Ma arvan, et landcover=grass tuleks siia tagasi panna. Olen enne ka sama asja mitmes kohas kommenteerinud (nt https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/130442838).
bxl-forever (2023-06-03 13:39:10+00:00): Bonjour,
Il faut utiliser le fond de carte AIV Flanders GRB pour les bâtiments svp.
Aussi utile pour les haies, pour aligner sur les limites des propriétés, car ici vous avez tout dessiné sur des photos aériennes et vos bâtiments et haies sont tout à fait décalés et ne sont pas conformes à la réalité.
Merci.
Isabelle Vandeborne (2023-06-04 16:53:10+00:00): Bonjour, d'accord. comment dois-je mettre cette carte AIV Flanders GRB?
bxl-forever (2023-06-04 23:04:09+00:00): OK, explication ici :

Quand vous êtes dans l'éditeur, il faut aller cliquer sur un des boutons de la barre de menu à la droite de l’écran.

C’est le bouton "Background Settings".
Le choix par défaut est "AIV Flanders most recent aerial imagery" → descendre dans la liste pour trouver "AIV Flanders GRB".

Happy mapping.
Frans S (2023-06-09 10:17:25+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
Please keep yourself to the instructions of this project.
This is a building project.
The way you map farmland (not required) introduced errors because you connected nodes to roads. 
Best regards
Glassman (2023-06-04 20:53:21+00:00): Can you review this edit - it looks like the house is bigger than what you redrew it as. It is hard to see from the imagery but it looks like it extends to the south just past the driveway.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136902393
rivermont (2023-06-04 19:54:46+00:00): What did you mean by tourism=farmstay? I assume it's a typo
MarksPhotoTrips (2023-06-05 01:45:27+00:00): It is not a typo. A farm stay is a working farm where vacation rentals are available.

The organization's website uses the term for their own rentals.
http://www.willetpondsfarm.com/
rivermont (2023-06-05 17:00:18+00:00): Is there a tag with equivalent meaning we can use? This is the only usage of tourism=farmstay. There is also one usage of resort=farmstay
BCNorwich (2023-06-03 16:03:21+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You've placed the POI quite a bit north of Shelton Street. Could you please reposition it?

Regards Bernard,
BCNorwich (2023-06-08 08:22:34+00:00): No response so I've moved it.
adrianojbr (2023-06-04 00:05:04+00:00): Olá, JoseUMTavaresArroio!

Em regra, as etiquetas devem ser escritas em inglês e, preferencialmente, usar aquelas documentadas, já que aumentam a chance de haver suporte pelas aplicações que usam os dados do OSM.

Para equipamentos de energia tem várias nessa página: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:power.

Abraço!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136903235
MarinoBM (2026-06-08 09:47:25+00:00): Hola Arturo Francisco Barbero, la clasificación de la carretera CL-601 sigue los mismos criterios recogidos en las directrices de etiquetado para Castilla y León. Pertenece a la Red Básica y le corresponde el etiquetado de highway=primary.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Directrices_de_etiquetado_espa%C3%B1olas#Castilla_y_Le%C3%B3n
Un saludo.
Arturo Francisco Barbero (2026-06-08 11:51:36+00:00): Hola, entiendo los criterios y sé que hay poco debate que abrir, pero que una misma carretera (antigua N-601) se parta en dos etiquetados distintos en cada comunidad autónoma cuando la carretera es igual a todos los sentidos únicamente por el color de las balizas me va a parecer siempre un sin sentido.

CL-601 y M-601 deberían de tener la misma clasificación si queremos ser coherentes porque es la misma vía, más haya de la cacicada de turno de la Junta, pero que se le vamos a hacer.
Saludos.
eggie (2023-06-03 15:53:47+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback  Wat is je bedoeling hier. Er loopt een bomenrij dwars over water en wegen.
Er is hier geen enkele boom te zien.
Je edits 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-06-03 16:01:06+00:00): reverted by changeset #136907563

Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=136903531
adrianojbr (2023-06-04 00:13:00+00:00): Olá, JoseUMTavaresArroio!

Reforçando, as etiquetas em regras são em inglês. Aqui estão os valores já documentados para superfície de vias: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:surface.

Abraço!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136903555
VLD302 (2023-07-06 21:40:39+00:00): Hello RSalenga, I saw that you added 66 connivence stores and gave them all the name "X" in the name tag. I was just wondering if all of these were named X? Thank you for your time and I hope you have a great day!
DP24PH (2023-07-07 00:54:56+00:00): Yikes! The 'X' that you have initially named are actually unknown names of stores. Kindly leave it blank if no name information is available for time being until surveyed properly. Thank you very much for mapping out missing stores/shops, and have a great day ahead!


DP24
user_5359 (2023-06-06 05:52:50+00:00): Hello! Please take a look on http://www.osm.org/node/10948894571, http://www.osm.org/node/10948894570. what is the difference between reduce_air_pollution_pa:kgs and reduce_air_pollution_pa_kgs?

Please don‘t mark unknown values as dot.

Are you sure, that the unknown tags (I assume tree property regarding air purification) are visible on the tree (on ground verification)? If this are extern calculation values (based on size, genus, ..) : please don‘t store the values to OSM (only the necessary based parameters)
user_5359 (2023-06-06 05:55:33+00:00): Hint: The small difference between underscore and colon also exists in other newly introduced keys.
rarad74 (2023-06-04 11:51:58+00:00): Salut. vezi ca pozitionezi gresit cladirile dupa BING. In plus  amprenta cladirilor nu se pune exact pe conturul acoperisurilor ci pe proiectia lor la sol, deoarece imaginile au fost luate in unghi, nu perpendicular cu solul.
Vladut Vasiliu (2023-06-04 14:24:56+00:00): Te rog sa reeditezi daca vrei și crezi că e cazul.
elgolfo (2023-06-05 10:25:28+00:00): Hi Stefan, 
du hast hier die Wege (hw=path, z.B. [1]) nördlich des Krötenteiches mit vehicle=no getaggt.
In der entsprechende Verordnung[2] finde ich aber kein Radfahrverbot auf den Wegen. Kannst du das vehicle=no wieder entfernen?
Oder hast du da noch weitere Informationen, warum das Radfahren dort verboten sein sollte?

Beste Grüße
Moritz
[1]: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23429731
[2]: https://gesetze.berlin.de/bsbe/document/jlr-M%C3%BCggelsee_FredMLSchVBErahmen
user_18208051 (2023-06-05 14:52:31+00:00): Hello Moritz,
I am not Stefan, this is a friend.
The paths you mentioned are not official (OK, a part to the west of the lake may be official, but not the entire length as shown in OpenStreetMap). Cycling off the paths is prohibited, hence probably the footpath with clearance for bicycles. vehicle=no because cars also have a no implied. Actually, one would have to check the entire area from the ordinance, but this is quite large. In the LSG, the following applies: cycling off the official paths and in the NSG: cycling off the public roads or paths. Cars are generally prohibited without signposted access. Best Robert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-08-26 09:21:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 140402648 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some fantasy mapping in Northern Cyprus.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/14426
maro21 (2023-06-03 22:27:31+00:00): one changeset = one country, please
Hidoo00 (2023-06-04 11:53:32+00:00): Sorry, I didn't realise I could upload it in smaller chunks. Will definitely do that in the future!
DressyPear4 (2023-06-04 03:31:57+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Boas_pr%C3%A1ticas#:~:text=description%3D*.-,Bons%20coment%C3%A1rios,-no%20conjunto%20de
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136905090
streckenkundler (2023-06-03 16:31:22+00:00): Hei,

Ich hatte das immernoch gelassen, da ich nicht sicher war, ob nicht eventuell ein Geldautomat überlebt hätte... Ich komme aber nicht so häufig zum Markt...

Ansonsten ist das Geschäft leer?

Danke,

Sven
söm4324 (2023-06-04 15:01:34+00:00): Hi Sven,
die Commerzbank ist komplett raus. Es sieht auch nicht aus, dass da bald wieder was neues reinkäme. Daher habe ich dieses Mal gelösch statt auf disused zu setzen.
Viele Grüße,
Thomas
streckenkundler (2023-06-04 15:36:12+00:00): Hallo Thomas,

alles Klar. Danke... Na irgendwas geht da wieder rein, ist ja eine  attraktive Stelle... 

Viele Grüße zurück, 

Sven
Fanch (2023-06-04 21:12:52+00:00): 👍
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-12-21 08:30:35+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10948985731/history jesteś pewien tych danych?

skąd je masz?
user_5359 (2023-06-06 05:37:10+00:00): Hello! Please take a look on http://www.osm.org/node/10949034425, http://www.osm.org/node/10948986578. What is the mean / reason of the tag continuous_highway = yes? This information exists normally.
SirCowMan (2023-06-06 23:22:07+00:00): Hi! St. John's has been moving from crossings where the pavement is broken, to ones where the sidewalk is maintained, for minor accesses (such as parking lots), so to differentiate. Can see also  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Continuous_Sidewalk
user_5359 (2023-06-07 04:07:50+00:00): Thanks for the interesting hint! But you see the difference between continuous_sidewalk and continuous_highway (you are the first to use this variant, see https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=Continuous_#keys).
SirCowMan (2023-06-07 08:43:25+00:00): Ah, I see, I see. Sorry! I was reading this as continuous_sidewalk - both on these nodes, and in this discussion. Eep! The use of continuous_highway here was unintentional and agree, doesn't make much sense. I've changed these two nodes to continuous_sidewalk (see changeset 137045928). Thanks for pointing it out! :)
aceman444 (2023-06-27 21:27:54+00:00): Zdravim, to odkedy sa ostrovceky ako https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1178587355 znacia ako priechody pre chodcov? Tam predsa chodci nemaju co behat.
aseidel (2023-06-07 09:50:49+00:00): Liebe:r Toni Leffers,
bitte an der K33 nochmal  class:bicycle=* prüfen: Wenn ein benutzungspflichtiger Radweg vorhanden ist, bitte den Tag nur an den Radweg setzen, nicht auf die Straße, denn dort darf mit dem Rad nicht gefahren werden.
Danke und herzliche Grüße
Antje Seidel
#lgmaps
G_P_J (2023-09-05 11:44:48+00:00): Adres posiadał już nazwę miejscowości w tagu addr:place.
flohoff (2023-06-15 20:41:07+00:00): Moin,
also deine "source" "eigene Recherche" ist ein bisschen - aehm - dummy-haft hierfür.

Dazu - war dieser Massenedit angekündigt - hab den nicht mitbekommen.

is_in ist seit langem deprecated aber so richtig finde ich rechtfertigt das nicht das alles zu entfernen.

Flo
MichaelFS (2023-06-16 07:29:10+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis, werde den "source"-Texte künftig mehr Aufmerksamkeit schenken.
flohoff (2023-06-16 08:42:04+00:00): Und das Thema mit der Ankündigung und Konsensbildung für die Massenedits?
MichaelFS (2023-06-16 13:05:46+00:00): Das sollte kein Massenedit sein. Ich hatte aus dem Forum eine neue JOSM-Funktionalität (OVERPASS) gelernt und nicht gleich bemerkt, dass die Region so groß wurde. Wird nicht mehr vorkommen, ich lerne ...