piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-11-20 00:53:05+00:00): reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159347609
nevw (2024-11-19 08:35:28+00:00): Hi, this building appears to exist on the latest imagery, Esri. Are you sure it needed to be deleted?
nevw (2024-11-20 00:58:57+00:00): I have reverted this changeset as the building exits on later imagery available in the editor and the building is included on the university web site.
TrickyFoxy (2024-11-19 06:41:30+00:00): На панорамах видно 6 этажей
habi (2025-03-10 08:25:11+00:00): Ciao poivronvertbleu

I'm looking at 'weird' access values in Switzerland and stumbled over https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1335298089/history/1 which you added with `access=pirate`.
Yarrr!

I corrected this to `access=private` :)

Happy mapping,
habi
poivronvertbleu (2025-03-10 12:26:07+00:00): Ciao/Hello 

Of course you're right, it's a typeface! Thank you for your vigilance. 
This is no private access for Jack Sparrows ;)
dval (2024-11-19 07:03:43+00:00): Дорога до территории рудника не может быть ниже unclassified, даже если она находится в собственности рудника, поскольку может использоваться другими людьми по иным назначениям.
dval (2024-11-19 06:30:05+00:00): Hi, Андрей_KoS! На каком основании вы удалили часть дорог и понизили статус одной до service?
mavl (2025-05-10 12:23:24+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок отменён по причине удаления существующих дорог.
mavl (2025-05-10 12:39:04+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок отменён по причине удаления дорог.
habi (2024-11-19 19:48:50+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159339934
habi (2024-11-19 08:07:24+00:00): Mersi fürs Nacheluege 'on the ground'.

Verschiedene Tags waren noch 'alt', so z.B. das Velotagging und der Wikidata-Link.
Ich habe das in https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=159313015 angepasst.
captain_slow (2024-11-19 08:22:50+00:00): Super, danke für das Review.
mavl (2025-05-11 14:21:04+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок отменён по причине удаления дорог.
totera (2024-11-19 18:23:40+00:00): Aerial imagery is not up to date; the road southwest of the mall has been closed for several months, leaving the road northwest a two-way street.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159336940
mavl (2025-05-13 15:07:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
mavl (2025-05-13 15:05:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-18 04:26:47+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165095187
mavl (2025-05-13 15:04:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
mavl (2025-05-13 15:06:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
reified (2025-04-24 22:30:00+00:00): Пожалуйста, больше не переносите в OSM данные из яндекса и других коммерческих сервисов — это запрещено делать правилами проекта. Все ваши правки рано или поздно будут отменены, если на них наткнётся кто-то из "модераторов" — такой объём ценной работы пропадёт зря.
eggie (2024-11-19 07:39:44+00:00): Goedemorgen,

Ik heb nog wel de format van phone= ........... aangepast naar +31 
MVG
eggie
Baloo Uriza (2024-11-19 14:05:27+00:00): Not bad, but don't abbreviate street names, please.  "W Woodhaven Dr" should probably be "West Woodhaven Drive".  Computers can create contractions and abbreviations easily but suck at telling "Drive" and "Doctor" apart, for example.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159311486
NorthCrab_upload (2024-11-19 07:30:59+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11076951272
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12353543060
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1189086781
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/376234319

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Udarian (2024-11-20 03:06:42+00:00): please stop rounding of the exit ramps there is nothing on the available imagery that shows them being rounded.
mavl (2025-05-13 15:08:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
mavl (2025-05-13 15:03:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
mavl (2025-05-13 15:04:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
PcMouse1 (2024-11-19 08:22:37+00:00): Hello joshuaboniface,
For all of your previous hydro related changesets where specifically is the data coming from? If this is coming from a external database or website there may be incompatibility issues with the OSM ODBL license. 
Cheers, PcMouse1
stillhart (2024-11-20 21:07:08+00:00): ♥️
skyper (2024-11-22 17:22:51+00:00): Hallo cbildner,
willkommen bei OSM. Es ist super, dass Du mit hilfst die Daten zu verbessern.
Leider sind Dir beim Eintragen ein paar, kleine Fehler unterlaufen:
* bei Telefonnummern wird immer die international Schreibweise mit internationaler Vorwahl (+49) verwendet. Dann wird die 0 vor der nationalen Vorwahl aber weggelassen.
* Öffnungszeiten werden mit englischen Abkürzungen der Wochentagen eingetragen (Di -> Tu).
* Webseiten werden mit Protokoll am Anfang eingetragen (https://)

Zu guter Letzt, hast Du unglücklicherweise eine Stelle erwischt, wo vor Deinen Änderungen einiges im Argen war. Das Hotel war zweimal in den Daten, als Punkt und als Fläche, wobei letztere auch noch zusätzlich als Gebäude fungierte. Nun hattest Du die Fläche in ein Restaurant umgeändert und zusätzlich das Hotel unter dem neuen Namen erneut als Punkt eingetragen.

Ich habe versucht mal ein Bisschen aufzuräumen, in dem ich die Gebäude separat eingetragen habe, die Fläche erweitert, vereinfacht und wieder als Hotel eingetragen habe, und für das Restaurant einen der beiden Punkte für das Hotel wieder verwendet habe. Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159468286.

Da ich mich leider nicht vor Ort auskenne bräuchte ich noch Deine Hilfe. Wo genau befindet sich das Restaurant (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12353606667) und handelt es sich bei der Fläche um die Sonnenterasse (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1336891006)?

Bitte nicht den Mut verlieren. Wir haben alle mal angefangen und machen auch heute trotz Erfahrung noch Fehler.
Viele Grüße und weiterhin viel Spaß beim Mappen,
skyper
cbildner (2024-11-26 12:09:08+00:00): Hi, vielen Dank. Ich habe jetzt mehrfach versucht das Gebäude, welches bereits angetragen, ist mit dem Restaurant zu verknüpfen. Ich bekomm es einfach nicht hin. Sonnenterasse ist fexied. Das Hotel befindet sich auf dem kompletten Areal. 

Viele Grüße
Christopher Bildner
skyper (2024-11-27 18:22:23+00:00): Hi Christopher,
ja dem Hotel habe ich das gesamte Areal zu gesprochen, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/307616598, und war so frei jetzt auch noch die Sonnenterrasse mit einzuschließen.
Die Terrasse habe ich mit `access=customers` ergänzt, damit klar ist, dass sie nur für Hotel- und Restaurantgäste vorgesehen ist.
Mit dem Restaurant würde ich mir keinen großen Kopf machen, sondern nur den Punkt (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12353606667) an die richtige Stelle schieben. Das Vermischen von Gebäuden und darin enthaltenen Einrichtungen als ein Objekt, kann öfters zu Problemen führen (s.o.). Wenn Du das Restaurant auch in seinen Dimensionen eintragen willst, gebe es die Möglichkeit, das Restaurant als eigenständige Fläche , analog zum Hotel, einzuzeichnen.

VG, skyper
osm_user1234 (2025-07-28 03:14:47+00:00): Je supprime les tags relatifs au restaurant pour les mettre à la bonne adresse, le n°2. Je pense qu'il est mieux de créer des noeuds pour les POI plutôt qu'utiliser ceux des n° d'adresses, car le risque serait de déplacer le POI, ce qui déplace le n° d'adresse, ou  que le n° d'adresse se trouve supprimé. D'autant plus lorsque le n° n'est pas uniquement lié au POI, ici il s'agit d'un immeuble d'habitation.
gscholz (2024-11-23 08:27:52+00:00): Hi Guidotitze,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding duplicate nodes and displaced ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=24.73557&lat=36.97523&zoom=18&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=159313863

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
eggie (2024-11-19 10:24:13+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
pavvv (2025-03-03 17:21:47+00:00): If you map temportary detours, then please revert your changes, once the route goes back to normal. Otherwise it's be better for the line to keep having the permanent route during the detour rather than the detour route after the detour ends.
adamos (2025-03-05 21:38:23+00:00): Hello Pavvv, thanks for your comment. This was part of my long-term plan to fix all broken public transport relations in Wroclaw. I fixed hundreds of missing segments, fixed misordered segments, removed buses that no longer exist, fixed lines going one-way streets in wrong directions etc. During the edits I was not able to recognize which are regular routes and which are temporary ones. I would leave the on-going maintenance to locals who knows the environment - if you agree.
pavvv (2025-03-06 08:16:04+00:00): Hey, thanks for fixing errors in routes. I do find it troublesome to add some ways back into routes after heavily editing highway geometry, especially when I edit in Vespucci.

As for updating the routes, I have updated all trams, almost all 1xx, 3xx and A-N buses with their variants (except 125 and 150). I've also done that with the majority of 2xx lines and a few 9xx. So in the future if you're editing one of the lines I mentioned above, it's probably best if you only fix some errors such as missing segments, but the overall route should be correct.
You can always check which lines are changed on this website, marked by yellow outlines https://www.wroclaw.pl/komunikacja/rozklady-jazdy . Those routes should probably stay the way that they are without mapping the detour, unless you plan on reverting the change after the detour ends. If you have any questions related to routes and detours in Wrocław or any questions in general you can always send me a DM.
Take care!
Supaplex030 (2024-11-19 12:22:35+00:00): Hallo, danke für die Bestätigung! Bei der Änderung in OSM ist leider ein Fehler passiert, den ich allerdings bereits korrigiert habe: Statt den "erlaubten Zugang" für Fahrräder auf "Nein" zu setzen, wäre die korrekte Variante gewesen, das Feld "Einbahn (Fahrrad)" zu ergänzen und auf "Nein" zu setzen. Oder in "OSM-Tags" ausgedrückt: Statt "bicycle=no" muss es "oneway:bicycle=no" heißen – aber wie gesagt, ich habe es bereits korrigiert. Das ist im OSM-Editor leider nicht sehr intuitiv gelöst.

Bei Fragen dazu, zu OSM oder zum Bearbeiten gern einfach melden – ich oder andere aus der OSM-Community helfen immer gern.

Beste Grüße
Alex

P.S. Zur Dokumentation vgl. auch https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159289788 – dort hatte ich gestern fälschlicherweise von "oneway:bicycle=yes" statt "oneway:bicycle=no" gesprochen :)
mavl (2025-05-13 15:03:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
woodpeck (2024-11-20 12:09:54+00:00): Dear Mayan Anastasya, thank you for your contributions to OpenStreetMap. You do not have to upload every single building - simply create 10 or 20 and then upload them all togehter. In the "changeset comment" field, enter a human-readable description of your edit (e.g. "added buildings in NAME_OF_CITY"). Do not write "ok", it makes no sense.

For the building name, only fill that field if the building has a NAME (for example "World Trade Center"). Do not but a description or the purpose of a building in the name tag. If something is already tagged as a building, don't add "Rumah" as the name - it is already clear.
woodpeck (2024-11-19 10:04:26+00:00): Dear ikndrv, welcome to OpenStreetMap. The "changeset comment" field is intended for a human-readable description of your edits. "istm-2024 buturlinovka red" is insider code that most OSM participants will not understand. Please write a short description of the edit, and if you are taking part in an organised editing activity, please observe the rules at https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines
NKA (2024-12-05 16:52:39+00:00): Denne ruten må bygges med de eksisterende highway=* som medlemmer, ikke som nye linjer langs highways. Ellers ikke vil sykkel- og tur-apper kunne bruke ruten.
riiga (2024-11-20 10:28:57+00:00): Hello, it seems you keep removing correct `roof:levels` information.

You also changed the shape of a roof from hipped to flat when it was correctly surveyed as hipped previously (way 169407262).

Can you please explain the reason for your changes?
WegefanHB (2024-11-20 13:38:11+00:00): First I corrected the bad mistakes from street-complete by roof-orientirung.
yasslay (2024-11-19 09:31:03+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159315634
yasslay (2024-11-19 09:32:58+00:00): Revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159215563 and another associated changeset, ignore comment above.
5m4u9 (2024-11-20 04:15:14+00:00): gracias por mejorar esta parte!

todo ese sector (triángulo) se interconectó con esta línea al sistema nacional de energía recién el 2022
joost schouppe (2024-11-20 09:09:12+00:00): Gracias por las mejoras! Era pura casualidad que vi una torre sin mapear, y empezé a seguirlo.
Un comentario: de este zona desde el punt marcado hacia el transformador  https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12353726267#map=14/-21.69699/-64.60206 no vi nada en los imagenes. Pero borraste el fixme como para indicar esta zona. Quizas por lo menos tendriamos que poner una Nota como para indicar que debe de estar mejorado.
5m4u9 (2024-11-20 13:00:28+00:00): ya entendí a lo que te refieres, justo esa parte no revisé si tenía torres y la fusioné con el resto 😖.

volví a añadir fixme y corregí más o menos por donde debería ir la línea de energía según la info en geo.gob.bo (que no es precisa).
5m4u9 (2024-11-20 13:01:37+00:00): https://geo.gob.bo/catalogue/#/dataset/2938
Caleb K Cheruiyot (2024-11-21 19:22:25+00:00): Is this a Transformer or light Mast?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159315763
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2024-11-20 17:57:46+00:00): Hi, is Hispaania maja not a community centre anymore? I'm confused that you've removed 

amenity=community_centre	
community_centre=cultural_centre
Hispaania Maja (2024-11-20 18:36:30+00:00): Hei! We are still a Spanish language and culture center, but now we also have a store offering Spanish food, wines, and books. We want the local community to know that they can stop by Hispaania Maja for products like pasta sauce, olive oil, and more.

As we’re also a Spanish language school and a venue for cultural events open to everyone, we’re not sure how to appear in multiple categorize.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2024-11-20 21:28:33+00:00): I'd recommend going to tags (at the bottom when you select a feature), 
1) restoring
amenity=community_centre
community_centre=cultural_centre
or maybe
community_centre=language_centre

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:community_centre

2) change
school:type=keeltekool
to
training=language

Unfortunately, most map applications categorize feature as a single category, so this will likely be a cultural center or a shop depending on the application.

One way to overcome this could be adding the shop separately, as a new node inside the building and removing shop tags from the cultural center.

I don't think this would be a problem since gas stations often have both gas station feature and a convenience shop feature.
Hispaania Maja (2024-11-20 21:38:52+00:00): Adding a new node is a great suggestion. Thank you!
Andrea Del Sarto (2025-03-06 20:13:51+00:00): Ciao,
le immagini Bing Maps Aerial non sono ortofoto. purtroppo su iD editor le ortofoto italiane PCN  non funzionano, mentre su JOSM sono operative

Inoltre si cerca di modificare gli elementi già presenti e non cancellarli, per non perdere la storicità nel database

saluti e buona mappature
Andrea
Pucciotrex30 (2025-03-07 16:11:28+00:00): Ops , e che sono ?
Pucciotrex30 (2025-03-07 16:12:51+00:00): no aspetta , me lo dico da solo ....
sono satellitari non corrette ? come Gmap?
Andrea Del Sarto (2025-03-08 09:37:33+00:00): quelle PCN sono del  Portale Cartografico Nazionale e sono le uniche ortofoto, almeno in Italia.
le altre spesso non sono allineate con le tracce gpx, che non risentono del disallineamento
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-11-20 00:53:06+00:00): reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159347609
Fizzie-DWG (2025-02-11 04:22:16+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162375392
dikkeknodel (2025-08-07 08:59:00+00:00): Hoi spaanse,
Met deze changeset heb je o.a. de wandelknooppunten L66 en L14 in Doornik toegevoegd. Deze knooppunten zijn in het veld niet aanwezig. Er staan wel routepaaltjes, maar alle routes gaan dezelfde kant op. Je geeft als bron PDOK, maar daar kun je deze referenties niet op aflezen al stonden ze er werkelijk. Wat is je bron voor deze info?
Groetjes,
Raymond
dikkeknodel (2025-08-07 09:03:24+00:00): Hetzelfde geldt dan voor de knooppuntsroutes die je aan deze knooppunten hebt gehangen.
spaanse (2025-08-07 15:20:18+00:00): Hoi dikkeknodel.

Deze twee knooppunten komen vanuit een survey. Er waren twee routes tussen de knooppunten, een daarvan ging over prive terrein. Dit had ik gemeld en heb teruggekregen dat de situatie sindsdien is aangepast. Ik denk dat dus de situatie is zoals jij die omschrijft.
dikkeknodel (2025-08-19 19:12:50+00:00): Bedankt voor de terugkoppeling, dan ga ik eruit halen.
Piagno (2025-10-25 20:51:54+00:00): Darf ich fragen, was der Hintergrund war, dass du diesen Weg hinzugefügt hast. Nach Luftbild sieht es aus, als wäre dort "nur" Wald und nach Swissalti3d sieht es nach sehr steil aus.
Die Kombi daraus, sieht für mich nach "kein Weg" aus.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1335354376
Voonosm (2025-10-26 09:46:15+00:00): Ich glaub, das war aus einem Wanderbeschrieb. Jemand der "alte Wege" lief, aber frag mich nicht mehr woher ich das hatte. Evtl hab ich vergessen, das Ding auf abandoned:highway zu setzen.
mavl (2025-05-13 15:05:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
eggie (2024-11-19 11:29:01+00:00): Nar jaren weer een bijdrage in OSM, maar nog geen welkomstmail ontvangen.
Bij deze alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback   Ik heb de voetpaden weer verbonden met de omliggende wegem. Het zou anders niet routeren. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-11-19 11:39:07+00:00): Een stukje tussen Winkelwaard bij nr 349 is niet bedoeld voor motorvoertuigen. Ik heb daar pedestrian van gemaakt met een opstaande stoeprand (barrier=kerb)  
Het is volgens mij geen doorgaande weg. 

MVG
eggie
nevw (2024-11-19 13:13:14+00:00): Hi, I reverted this changeset because you connected a footway to a powerline.
You need to add the footway again by zooming in much closer so that you connect it only to the footway.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-11-19 11:31:02+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.

"Wola Wadowska":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7565578716
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12354002461
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1335367900

"Jamy":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12354002467

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
spiregrain (2024-11-19 12:25:10+00:00): Hi there!  In this changeset, you've deleted way 39444238, a path  which used to run from north of the Boat House down to near the Perch Pond.  You've replaced it with way 1335368253 - but that one is only half as long.   

Did you really mean to cut the path down like that?
spiregrain (2024-11-19 12:25:58+00:00): Oh - I see there's a continue point.   I'll shortly continue it, using the GPS traces to find the correct alignment.
spiregrain (2024-11-19 12:27:40+00:00): changeset #: 159322444
tobych (2024-11-19 20:54:16+00:00): Ah, yes, my mistake. There was a polygon that was being scrub, and a path at the same time. I got rid of that because it was really sketchy, but failed to check to see if it was real. I'm glad you spotted this.
woodpeck (2024-12-01 20:17:36+00:00): Could we spend a little more time educating compo_RK about why their edits had to be reverted? Going back through the comments that their edits have attracted, I see frequent outrage but little substance in regards to what exactly they did wrong.
Famlam (2025-04-12 19:22:50+00:00): Dag Zandkuil, ik heb de relaties weer verwijderd (en een paar andere dingen gecorrigeerd). Turn restricties die per definitie onmogelijk zijn (want: tegen eenrichtingsverkeer in) mappen we niet.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164869686
Jan Olieslagers (2024-11-20 09:47:00+00:00): When creating a new aerodrome description, allow me to insist you should remove any existing one, after transferring all its information.
I will do it for you, this time.
Palgrave Peter (2024-11-24 14:56:51+00:00): Ok, thanks.  I'll get it right next time!
Aleksei Gurianov (2024-11-19 19:04:49+00:00): Thanks for contributon.
Please note that buildings are expected to be aligned by their ground level.