piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2025-12-27 16:48:18+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/2345696779 v2

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Salon de coiffure avec néon"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description
NeisBot (2026-01-01 18:12:35+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/176713846
rarad74 (2025-12-23 20:15:10+00:00): AI inversat sensurl aiurea. Se bat cap in cap.  
LAsa-l asa cum era, ca era corect!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
rskedgell (2025-12-23 19:09:46+00:00): (Review requested)

Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Access tags like foot=no in OSM are intended to reflect the legal position. In the UK, pedestrians use highways by absolute right, unless there is a traffic order and sign (TSRGD diagram 625.1 "pedestrians prohibited"). It's not very common, although you can see it at the entrances to the nearby Upper Thames Street Tunnel. It isn't the case on White Lion Hill, even on the short section without a pavement between the steps down to Paul's Walk and Blackfriars Underpass.

It's understandable that you might want to discourage pedestrian routing on the carriageway, but however unsafe and impractical it might seem to you, it's still legal. If pedestrian routing software has tried to suggest it as a route, I'd be a little dubious about any other routes it might produce.

This is quite a common misunderstanding and, as it's been reverted, no harm has been done. Happy mapping (and Happy Christmas)!
Paul Morrison ESX (2025-12-24 06:52:43+00:00): Thank you, this is exactly why I requested a review 👍

I’ll wait for a quiet traffic day before I try to tick it off on Wandrer Earth 😄
eggie (2025-12-23 15:18:54+00:00): Niko 

Ben je er gaan kijken? Wat is je bron van de verwijdering?
Heb je gekeken naar de datum van de toevoeging en of contact met de voorgaande mapper opgenomen? 
https://viewer.satellietdataportaal.nl/@53.23982,6.638811,18/?datastrip=20251124_PNEO-03

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-12-23 15:24:23+00:00): Net geopend https://gemeente.groningen.nl/laatste-deel-doorfietsroute-ten-boer-groningen-en-vernieuwde-noorddijkerweg-geopend
eggie (2025-12-23 15:31:41+00:00): reverted by changeset #176313927

Ga svp eerst zelf na of zo'n verwijdering wel klopt.
De voorgaande mappers zullen dat toch niet zomaar verzonnen hebben.
De voorgaande mapper was ik o.a. zelf.

Een betonpad kan snel aangelegd zijn.
Een luchtfoto kan je op het verkeerde been zetten.

MVG
eggie
user_23358447 (2025-12-23 16:01:22+00:00): Ja ik heb het gezien (zoals ik ook aangegeven heb). 
Geen idee waarom iemand het erin heeft gezet, want het lijkt niet eens op een fietspad. 
Ik stop trouwens weer mee OpenStreetMap, de wijze waarop jij me de hele tijd steeds feedback geeft is niet erg opbouwend en erg demotiverend. Succes ermee.
eggie (2025-12-23 16:13:17+00:00): Beste Niko,

Het enige wat ik doe is valideren en evt helpen.
Iemand demotiveren is niet mijn bedoeling.
Jij beweert dat er geen fietspad is dat 5 dec jl is geopend. 

Het je het artikel bekeken? 
Wanneer ben je hier geweest?
Van het voorjaar was hier inderdaad nog weinig te zien, behalve dan de voorbelasting. 

Laat je niet ontmoedigen. Mappen in OSM is best lastig in het begin. Controle door een validator is een normale procedure. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-12-23 15:21:09+00:00): Dag Niko  Het zou zomaar prive kunnen zijn, maar je haalt hier de highwaytag gewoon weg? Waarom?
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-12-23 15:22:43+00:00): De toegangsweg heb ik teruggezet als highway=service
Gr eggie
eggie (2025-12-23 15:53:05+00:00): Dag Dirk .. Wanneer een bedrijft verhuist zal toch het adres achter blijven? Dat heb je nu verwijderd.
Het adres heb ik teruggezet.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-12-23 15:55:17+00:00): Je hebt nu twee kunstwerken naast elkaar. Het kunstwerk wat er al stond heeft als beschrijving Adelaar. Gaat het niet over het zelfde?

MVG
eggie
Liskwartier (2025-12-23 16:10:06+00:00): Klopt, gaat over hetzelfde kunstwerk, wilde enkel de locatie aanpassen. Het staat bij de kruising
eggie (2025-12-23 16:14:46+00:00): Ah.. mooi zo.. Ik heb de info samengevoegd van beide kunstwerken.
Het staat nu alleen bij de kruising.

MVG
eggie
aceman444 (2026-01-28 13:44:42+00:00): Zdravim, z coho vyplyvaju tieto nazvy zastavok? 
Aky je zdroj iscp sk? Mame povolenie z neho cerpat udaje pre OSM?
Su to oficialne nazvy dopravcu, ako su na tabulkach ci cestovnom poriadku? A preco ste zmenili len 2 nastupistia  "Sered, Nam. Slobody) ked ich je tam viac a este ste to urobili so roznym zapisom (s ciarkou ci bez). Nezmenili sa rovnako vsetky nastupistia? Podobne napr. Sered,Priemyselna ste zmenili len na jednej strane ceste. V opacnom smere sa zastavka nepremenovala?
Jojo222 (2026-01-28 14:02:45+00:00): ďakujem za povšímnutie
k 14.dec. došlo k zmene názvov, zmeny v názvoch zastávok sú dostupné z verejnej databázy
http://www.iscp.sk/pages/zmeny_z/tabulky_z/tabu1141.html
flohoff (2025-12-28 21:28:54+00:00): Ich verstehe hier die änderung nicht mehr. Also wenn die Straße weggerutscht und nicht repariert ist dann ist da doch keine Straße richtig? Oder es ist nur ein Pfad oder ähnliches.

Du hast das jetzt geändert auf eine existierende Straße die nur ein Z260 + Z1020-30 trägt aber ansonsten vollständig ist.

Das passt ja nicht zu dem was passiert ist und auch nicht zum Luftbild.

Flo
JakobD029 (2025-12-28 21:54:08+00:00): Also:
Die Straße ist 2023 (soweit ich mich erinnere) durch einen Erdrutsch zerstört worden.
Ende 2024 oder Anfang 2025 wurde die Straße daraufhin neu angelegt. Zunächst mit einer Schotterdecke. Diese sollte sich erstmal "setzen". Seither ist die Straße auch wieder befahrbar bis zu dem Durchfahrt Verboten Schild kurz vor dem Bauernhof.
Die DOPs vom Land NRW sind von 2024. 
Folgendes Foto ist vom April 2025:
https://imgur.com/a/vcCKN3U
MfG
eggie (2025-12-23 16:23:28+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
TinPetreković (2025-12-24 12:35:21+00:00): Segments were merged back together and tagged accordingly in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176352270
NeisBot (2025-12-27 16:48:20+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13395816788 v3

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Machine shop in Bulloch County"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description
NeisBot (2026-01-01 18:12:35+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/176713847
NeisBot (2025-12-27 16:48:21+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/1022115656 v5

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Candy store in Bastrop TX"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description
NeisBot (2026-01-01 18:12:35+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/176713848
user_5359 (2025-12-24 06:33:52+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/990983189 (one of many). What is the mean of the tag Localiza = Urbana?
PlayzinhoAgro-imports (2025-12-24 11:19:44+00:00): I shouldn’t have uploaded that tag, it’s more of a guide to help check whether the location is correct, or in this case whether the school is in an urban or rural area. Thanks for noticing, I’ve already fixed it.
JakovBušić (2025-12-27 07:16:08+00:00): Wrong hgv restriction that was accidentally made in this changeset was deleted in changeset 176468990. "OptimoRoute"
JakovBušić (2025-12-27 07:25:47+00:00): Wrong hgv restriction that was accidentally made in this changeset was removed in changeset 176469185 "OptimoRoute"
NeisBot (2025-12-23 15:59:21+00:00): Hi RezGolf, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 93% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 8 highway(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=176315144
pitscheplatsch (2025-12-27 13:08:42+00:00): #KeepTheHistory

Hi, thanks for your contribution! 

I noticed you deleted and redrew some features instead of editing the existing ones. In OpenStreetMap, it’s usually better to adjust the geometry of existing objects rather than replacing them completely.

This way we keep the history, preserve any important tags, and avoid breaking relations like routes or boundaries. Redrawing can accidentally remove valuable details and make it harder for others to track changes.

For future edits, please try to move or reshape the existing nodes instead of deleting them, this helps maintain OSM’s data quality and history. Thanks again for helping improve the map.

Best regards.
NeisBot (2025-12-27 16:48:23+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/434071208 v4

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Gold and coin dealer in Chesterton IN"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description
NeisBot (2026-01-01 18:37:36+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/176714602
Rainero-repair (2026-03-31 12:51:03+00:00): Revert in changeset/180671504
wegen nicht zulässiger Quelle (Bayernatlas).
DeFra85 (2025-12-29 17:42:44+00:00): Entschuldigung, aber Wege werden in OSM nicht einfach gelöscht, vor allem wenn da noch Relationen (Wanderwege) drüber laufen !!!
mwerth (2026-01-01 11:50:45+00:00): Ok. Es hat mich auch irritiert, daß hier ein Wanderweg unterbrochen wurde. In der Realität ist der Übergang über die Gleise hier nicht mehr möglich.
Wir wird die aktuelle Situation jetzt korrekt dokumentiert???
DeFra85 (2026-01-01 11:57:51+00:00): Ich habe es schon repariert: ich bin erstmal davon ausgegangen, dass der Übergang im Laufe der Bauarbeiten wieder hergestellt wird. Deshalb habe ich den Weg wiederhergestellt als highway=construction mit construction=path, also "Weg im Bau".
Ich habe auch den Tecklenburger-Land-Tourismus angeschrieben ob die von der Baustelle wissen und schon eine Umleitung eingerichtet haben, die ich ggf. eintragen könnte.
mwerth (2026-01-01 12:12:09+00:00): Alles klar. Danke für die Korrektur und die Infos!
eggie (2025-12-23 16:28:16+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  Wat is de bron van je toevoegingen. Wanneer dit een bulkimport is uit een databestand is dit niet zomaar toegestaan.
Zoiets wordt eerst besproken op het forum van OSM.  
Eigen waarneming uiteraard wel. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
rempshaener (2025-12-23 18:33:24+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.
Du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Das sieht bis hierhin schon ganz gut aus, nur eine Kleinigkeit fehlt.
Bislang hat nur das Gebäude einen Namen, es fehlt die Angabe, worauf sich der Name bezieht.
D. h.: office=advertising_agency ergänzen – das wäre es schon.
Vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag und weiterhin viel Spaß beim Mappen.
Viele Grüße
JakovBušić (2025-12-27 07:29:20+00:00): Wrong hgv restriction that was accidentally made in this changeset was deleted in changeset 176469278 #OptimoRoute
Norbert Dichter (2025-12-23 16:56:22+00:00): Hello, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. Thank you for your contribution. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. Or just hit the Q-key.
Also please keep in mind: many buildings are very close but do not actually touch each other, try to map them close to each other without letting them connect or share nodes with each other, roads, or residential area outlines. In the iD web editor, holding down the "alt" key will keep nodes from "snapping" to each other and accidentally connecting.  Thanks so much for your contribution, Norbert 'Nodi' Dichter, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176316601
Marcos Dione (2026-04-04 10:41:05+00:00): I changed https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1460795886 to footway, please fix if wrong (`ifo` is not valid).
NieWnen (2026-04-04 12:55:15+00:00): Thanks!
Evros1969 (2025-12-25 14:24:33+00:00): Hallo Befega können Sie mir bitte erklären warum sie die Gebäude in der  Partnachstraße 50 gelöscht haben ?https://photos.app.goo.gl/FJfnsEWfpjxcgXBJ8 In der Reintalstraße zwischen dem Haus 6-7 haben sie die Gebäude auch nicht richtig gegänzt. https://photos.app.goo.gl/N5HVgmoemWweLV3EA In der Chamonixstraße 50 Ist es eine Feuerwehrzufahrt und kein Fußweg https://photos.app.goo.gl/fKkfDEyzYzT66hAv7 In der Chamonixstraße auf beiden Seiten der Straße ist ein Bürgersteig .Ist auch eingetragen mit Sidwalk=Both  ergänzt. Warum haben sie es nochmal eingetragen? Manche Bäume von ihnen wo sie hinzugefügt haben Stelle ich auch In Frage?
befega (2025-12-29 19:06:08+00:00): Also, das Gebäude habe ich gelöscht, weil es in Kürze komplett abgerissen wird. Es ist bereits eingezäunt, somit habe ich die Fläche als Baustelle gemapt. 
Ansonsten mögen noch nicht alle Details richtig sein. Aber das lässt sich ja noch korrigieren. Die Bäume habe ich aus dem Infratot-Orthofoto abgeleitet.
A Hall (2026-01-21 04:16:35+00:00): Similarly to my other comment about the lifts, I'm not sure its appropriate to add these trails in. Given the outlines/grade of the trails still exist, there may be a path to keep them, however, it's dubious under OSM guidelines. Are these trails still signed? Even if signed, they should be properly marked with access and lifecycle tagging so no one assumes access is allowed when it's explicitly denied
sfromo19 (2026-01-21 13:27:33+00:00): Hi there,

Trails on this map are still signed as part of the Town of Sutton's King Hill Reservation trail system. They can be found on the trail map, as well as being labelled with blazes and signs on the physical trails themselves. This is a popular area for backcountry skiing, with every trail having at minimum some portion - if not the whole trail - remaining clear.
A Hall (2026-01-26 17:25:38+00:00): Are you able to confirm that the trails are signed in their historical entirety? Or are the signs now only up for trails where public access is allowed? I'd like to preserve as much information that you've added but also recognizing that if there are no signs and no access allowed, those trails should sadly be deleted entirely.
JakovBušić (2025-12-27 07:44:26+00:00): Wrong hgv restriction that was accidentally made in this changeset was deleted in changeset 176469551 "OptimoRoute"
gurglypipe (2025-12-25 19:36:21+00:00): Hiya, please don’t make edits which span such a large geographical area, as it makes it hard for others to review them.

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

This should probably have been one edit per county or per airport, and with a more descriptive changeset message than “additions and fixes”, as that’s meaningless. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Are these IATA codes you’ve added actually valid? I’ve searched for a few of them and they don’t show up on the IATA website (e.g. https://www.iata.org/en/publications/directories/code-search/?airport.search=QKC)
gurglypipe (2025-12-28 17:56:20+00:00): I reverted the IATA changes as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176541500
lakedistrict (2026-01-02 23:12:18+00:00): @silver1549 What's your source for the helipads you have added in Cumbria (in this and other chnagesets)?
silver1549 (2026-01-03 01:54:15+00:00): @lakedistrict personal knowledge
felipeeugenio (2025-12-25 11:03:43+00:00): Hola. Un camino no cambia de categoría solo porque cambien sus propiedades físicas (fue asfaltado). Pero puede ser en este caso, ya que al ser asfaltado cambia su función en la red. @jptolosa es el especialista en esto.

saludos
eggie (2025-12-23 18:42:44+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Taya_S (2026-01-15 07:45:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted. Please make sure you comply with the import guidelines first. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177247573
NeisBot (2025-12-27 16:48:27+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13398089937 v1

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Erkek berber in Çankaya Ankara"
---
Örneğin, açıklamanızın daha tarafsız ve gerçek bir versiyonu şöyle olabilir: "Çankaya Ankara'da erkek berber"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description
NeisBot (2026-01-02 12:10:52+00:00): 🗑️🤖 Element deleted by https://osm.org/changeset/176740159

 If you believe this deletion was incorrect or would like to clarify the intent of the original tags, please reply here.
eggie (2025-12-23 18:43:52+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
NeisBot (2025-12-27 16:48:30+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13397857437 v2

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Trailer dealer in Huntsville AL"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description
NeisBot (2026-01-01 18:37:36+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/176714603
Taya_S (2025-12-24 05:46:37+00:00): Reverted deletion of place and name tags

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176337604
fndoder (2025-12-24 12:13:47+00:00): Для тестовых и учебных целей есть отдельный сайт с песочницей OSM, см. https://apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/

Этот учебный пакет правок я откатил.
kabelhaai (2025-12-24 13:22:11+00:00): Dag Bart, verwijdering routerelatie DDB129 gebeurd ter vergissing?
DR Bart (2025-12-24 14:08:37+00:00): Hi, nee hoor. Ik heb war ge-experimenteerd om onzichtbare relaties aan te maken, zodat op de dag zelf van opening van de route, er weinig werk is. Twee vaststellingen: 1. Zo veel werk is het eigenlijk niet om de GR uit te breiden van Brugge tot knokke. 2. Dan hebben we eigenlijk 2 relaties (GR 129 Brugge Kust, en GR 129 Vlaanderen. Die moeten we dan samen onderbrengen in een superrelatie. Nogsl ingewikkeld. Conclusie: ik heb mijn ewperiment met DDB129 verwijderd, en zal, als het zo ver is,  vlug het stuk Zwin-Katelijnebrug toevoegen.
Grts
coatix (2025-12-23 18:12:25+00:00): 👀
coatix (2025-12-23 18:31:10+00:00): War level=-1 mit Absicht bei n9316381618?
hlfan (2025-12-23 21:57:44+00:00): Ja, sonst beschwert sich iD, dass die zu nahe an node/9316381617 liegt. Und -1 weil ich nicht den Anschein erwecken will, dass der andere über der Brücke liegt.
Tuplanolla (2025-12-23 17:54:56+00:00): The commit message was truncated for being too long. Here is the complete summary.

Fixed some drunkard edits. Perfectly fine trails were removed without first tagging them with `was:highway=path` for different seasons. Some ways were folded back on themselves, so that they went in two opposite directions at the same time. Logging machine tracks were tagged `highway=path` instead of `highway=track` with `tracktype=grade5` or `man_made=cutline`. Sometimes `visibility` was used instead of `trail_visibility`. Trails tagged with `mtb:scale` were not pointed downhill. Ways had inconsistent resolution with many spurious collinear points.
eggie (2025-12-23 21:50:04+00:00): Je vraagt feedback.. 
Lijkt me zo kloppen. Dan is het verder zaak om het water toe te voegen en evt de oevers.
Gr eggie
schermpeter (2025-12-27 13:09:21+00:00): OK bedankt!
bartgron (2025-12-23 20:10:44+00:00): Zestaw zmian wycofany:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176324740
Pozdrawiam i proszę o nie niszczenie mapy
eggie (2025-12-23 18:46:16+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Taya_S (2026-01-15 07:49:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted. Please make sure you comply with the import guidelines first. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177247697
kitsee (2025-12-24 00:22:34+00:00): Hello Andrew,

Thank you for contributing to OSM.
Just a small tip, in the online editor you can square up ways by right clicking on them and pressing the square button or by using the shortcut "Q".
Hope this is of some use.

Kind regards,
Kits
Andrewblackwell1968 (2025-12-24 13:28:52+00:00): Hi Kits, thanks for that info, i will give it a try
Cheers
eggie (2025-12-23 18:49:58+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  Het is niet de bedoeling om beschrijvingen met name=....  te taggen.
Dus svp geen name=huis, name=hondenhok, name= paardenstal.
Voor de functie zijn aparte tags.  
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-12-23 18:59:50+00:00): Svp geen gebouwen aanpasssen op grond van schuingenomen luchtfoto's. Daar staan die gebouwen niet. Van boven gezien krijgen gebouwen ook geen puntdaken.  Ik heb de gebouwen hersteld en de namen verwijderd.
Mapse,
eggie