piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Andrea Musuruane (2024-06-06 12:42:08+00:00): Ciao. In Italia i numeri civici non vanno mai messi sugli edifici. Il numero civico è il numero che contraddistingue l'accesso esterno che dall’area di circolazione (strada, piazza, via, ecc) immette direttamente o indirettamente alle unità immobiliari (abitazioni, esercizi commerciali, uffici, garage, ecc.) o alle aree recintate non edificate (es. stabilimenti balneari). Non è quindi corretto associare i tag addr:* ad un edificio. Bisogna quindi inserire un nodo in corrispondenza dell'ingresso dove si trova la targhetta ed etichettalo opportunamente. Ciao, Andrea
NeisBot (2024-06-06 09:30:25+00:00): Hi Janek Lisewski, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/node/11959940375

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
WoodWoseWulf (2024-06-06 20:33:26+00:00): Witam Janku Liszewskim,
Miejsce zaznaczenia tej plaży wydaje się pokazywać pole nad jeziorem, a nie plażę. Czy sprawdziłeś jak OSM Wiki opisuje plaże?

Hi Janek Lisewski,
Where you have this beach marked appears to show a lakeside field rather than a beach. Have you checked how the OSM Wiki describes beaches?
richlv (2024-06-07 10:33:24+00:00): Liels paldies par kartes uzlabošanu.
Daži precizējoši jautājumi.

a) Droši vien šiem int_name jāņem nost?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/124358221/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/124353012/history

b) Vai šī joprojām ir skola? Ja tā, kā to sauc?
Ja nē, kas tur tagad ir? Tad būtu jānomaina apzīmējumi teritorijai un ēkai.

c) Vai šo agrāk sauca "Madonas 2. vidusskola"?
Ja tā, to būtu jauki pievienot old_name.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/954879109/history

Priecāsimies arī apspriest detaļas Latvijas OSM kopienas čatā: https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com .
silversurfer83 (2024-06-07 00:13:18+00:00): Gude :)

die Adresse bitte entweder am Haupteingang (halte ich, wenn die Position bekannt ist für die gute Lösung) ODER am Gebäude erfassen. Bitte keine Doppelerfassung, außer es gibt im Gebäude noch POIs, die erfasst werden. Die dürfen ihre Adresse auch tragen.

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152322380
Kovoschiz (2024-06-06 11:42:53+00:00): 1. Please don't add bracketed descriptor labels to `name=` , which is for proper names only. Don't make them up artificially. Use `description:zh=` for such text. 
2. `=exhibtion _centre` means a large exhibition and convention center for shows and events, not any facility exhibiting something. I'm not sure what this should be, but it could be eg `=museum` first.
jbcharron (2024-06-06 20:09:24+00:00): Bonjour,

Merci pour vos contributions.
Je suis très heureux de voir que des agents de collectivités contribuent à OSM.
J'ai remarqué que le tag wikipédia avait déja été modifié alors que la page wikipédia a encore l'ancien nom.Ne faudrait pas plutôt attendre que le page soit renommée pour mettre à jour OSM ?
Bonne soirée à vous
pza (2024-06-17 11:04:26+00:00): These look like random, incorrect changes. Reverting
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152322701
DaanLT (2024-06-06 09:53:06+00:00): statybos nebaigtos :)
gileri (2024-06-06 19:04:43+00:00): Les objections soulevées n'ont pas eu de réponse, il n'y a pas consensus.
Zekovski (2024-06-07 09:41:49+00:00): Consensus n'est pas unanimité.
Mais si tu souhaites qu'on soit tous d'accord sur la manière de cartographier et que cette histoire se termine une fois pour toutes (c'est mon souhait aussi), je t'invite à relancer le sujet sur le forum en signalant que ça ne va pas. Puisqu'apparemment ça semble réglé pour les autres membres et que le sujet n'est plus débattu.
silversurfer83 (2024-06-07 00:16:27+00:00): Hi :)

du hast die Berechtigungen für Fuß und Rad auf designated gelassen. Das ist bei construction etwas uneindeutig, oder? Hatte das Thema vor einer Weile mal mit anderen besprochen und wir waren der Meinung, dass die access Werte auch an die Situation der Baustelle angepasst werden sollten. So kann es ja sein, dass irgendwo eine Straße gemacht wird und dort Fußgänger*innen weiter problemlos entlang können. Da sind die korrekten access Werte dann hilfreich.

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152323854
Ana Luisa (2024-06-10 06:37:15+00:00): Hi, ich hatte die anderen Keys drauf gelassen um nachher nicht wieder alles "neu" mappen zu müssen. Dass das ganze zumindeste teilweise uneindeutig sein kann, versteh ich. Wobei ..naja .. das Schild für "designated" steht ja noch da ;)
Ich habe jetzt mal nen "access=no" drauf gesetzt, da ja das Betreten der Baustelle ansich verboten ist. Und wenn man es auf die Sptize treiben möchte: die Bauarbeiter können den Fußweg ja noch nutzen ;)
viele Grüße
Jelena Cvetkovic (2024-06-25 08:45:35+00:00): Such a nice građevina, Lana!
❤️‍🔥 (2024-06-11 10:09:42+00:00): Hi, could you please share some more information about this 'construction project'? I can't find any online sources which mention this, and it's not visible in any aerial imagery
Sanniu (2024-07-01 08:31:32+00:00): Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1289856903 overlaps existing street, can you select one that is real?
Patchi (2024-06-08 12:47:13+00:00): Hello HaPe-CZ,

I don't quite understand why you change the platform ways from the train stations Saint-André-les-Alpes (https://osm.org/way/395252564) and Entrevaux (https://osm.org/way/396734929) into a multipolygon.
First of all, the platform ways are used into several train route relations and therefore we do have now some inconsistencies. The former platform ways with the role platform are no platforms anymore (just an outer way from a multipolygon).
And secondly, I doubt, that the shelters which are now used as inner ways for the new created multipolygons are not onto these platforms. What is the problem to have a shelter onto a train platform? In my humble opinion it is not necessary to create a multipolygon in that case. There all kinds of objects onto train platforms (bin, bench, etc…) and a shelter is one possibility. In this case the shelter is still a part of the platform. With your changes, it suggests that these shelters are not a part of the platforms anymore.

Best regards,

Patchi.
HaPe-CZ (2024-06-09 19:06:02+00:00): The sessions were transferred from the contour to the platform area.
If the shelter and platform is not designed as a multipolygon, the shelter is not displayed.
Gasconha18 (2024-06-06 10:38:44+00:00): *D929A
aseidel (2024-06-06 11:42:39+00:00): Liebe livtoedt,
bitte noch die Maßeinheit hinter der Breitenangabe entfernen ("1.1" statt "1.1 m"). Danke!
Herzliche Grüße
Antje Seidel
#lgmaps
mikimapbuilder (2024-06-06 11:12:20+00:00): Hi. I have removed the descriptive name of a road, try avoiding adding similar tags in the future, since there is no need to add it, the proper one would be noname=yes. Happy mapping.
Mammi71 (2024-10-02 21:54:59+00:00): Hallo F1R3F1GHTR und willkommen bei OSM.
Du hast hier eine Ladestation kartiert. Aber warum hast Du der Ladestation eine Adresse vergeben? In OSM bekommt ein Objekt i.d.R. nur Adressdaten, wenn dort Post zugestellt werden kann. Es gibt aber noch ein anderes "Adressschema": object:housenumber usw: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:object:*
Da komme ich aber gleich zum nächsten Problem: woher hast Du die Adresse? Es gibt hier weit und breit keine Schulstr. 35, die Feuerwehr hat die 33, und die liegt schon weiter weg.
Woher auch immer Du die Daten hast, bitte niemals blind kopieren. Solche Daten können falsch sein und wahrscheinlich anderen Schutzrechten unterliegen.
PS: Und bitte dran denken, wenn Du die Eintragung vorgenommen hast, dann bitte die Fehlermeldung auf der Karte als erledigt markieren (aberich vergesse das auch manchmal ...)
kapazao (2024-10-08 07:31:12+00:00): Hola, ¿tienes alguna referencia para confirmar que este aparcamiento es público?

Tiene un portón cerrado y una puerta al lado que indica que esta es de acceso privado, por lo que tengo dudas acerca del acceso del aparcamiento.

Un saludo
fititnt (2024-06-07 00:35:43+00:00): Olá @Frans S

Os ford=yes que adicionou no mapa são visíveis? Só estou comentando porque nessa região não seria possível assumir que toda intersecção entre vias e cursos de água (em especial cursos de água que não são pequenos) sejam ford=yes.

O https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11960089938/history por exemplo, é uma ponte.

O node/11960089939 e node/4708721475, sim, é visível que são ford=yes. 

Digo isso porque nessa região, é mais comum ou tunnel=culvert ou brige=* . Até mesmo caminhos informais costumam ter algum tipo de ponte (que é pequena demais para passar um veículo).
Frans S (2024-06-07 10:39:00+00:00): Olá.  Obrigado pela vossa resposta.
Na primeira situação, pode ver nas imagens da Mapbox que há algo sobre a água. Não se sabe bem o quê, mas a estrada é acessível. 
Não escolhi deliberadamente um “Ford” porque não é claro.
Um abraço
nevw (2024-06-06 13:07:53+00:00): Ducklo School Road on each side of this section you have renamed Ducklo Gulgera Road.
Would you be able to survey what all sections of the road should be named?
eggie (2025-02-11 11:27:37+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap Nederland.  Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
miluethi (2024-07-04 17:59:07+00:00): Alexandra,

your building shapes are often 2x 3x times as big as shown on the aerial imagery. I'm going to revert your edits.

Please match exactly the size of the building on the aerial imagery without adding shadows and empty yards around the building.

If possible, square out all shapes by selecting them and pressing the "Q" key.

Thank you for contributing to OSM Nicaragua.
Cybereric (2024-09-22 14:15:53+00:00): Hello,

What is this kind of "logic" ?

What does the non "importance" of trees mean ? Because there are forests around ?

If yes, I don't see why this would prevent mapping trees in gardens, parks (what would we do with a botanical garden ?) or streets.

Besides, who would define this criterion ?

Please look at (and read) the wiki => https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dtree

You'll see that there is no restriction criterion that says that trees taken individually would not be "important" for an area !

Look at the map, trees are mapped in cities !

Here in Turku : https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/60.452478/22.278772

Here in Helsinki :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/60.186738/24.944745
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/60.184449/24.950193
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/60.174528/24.983945

All trees (36810) in Helsinki => https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1RvT (7Mb of data so maybe a bit of a wait)

And look elsewhere in the world!

I've restored the deleted data

Best regards
Earthly0270 (2024-09-22 14:28:45+00:00): Hello there,

Thank you for your comment. 
I'm a newbie when it comes to editing maps and I see your point that it's beneficial to mark specific trees on the map in parks, public gardens, etc.

Onwards from now, I'll mark down single trees when it's reasonable to do so.

Thank you for the advice!
kapazao (2024-06-07 08:08:58+00:00): La tipología de la vía no debe cambiarse por su tipo de superficie. Por lo que si sigue siendo un camino debería ser highway=track y no carretera.
El que tenga surface=asphalt no implica que se convierta en highway=unclassified.
Puedes consultar la wiki para ver sus diferencias.
Un saludo
tastrax (2024-06-06 22:48:43+00:00): Hi folks and welcome to OSM Enjoy your mapping. FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, +61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
kapazao (2024-06-06 16:22:33+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambios añades un nombre a una vía pero no indicas de donde viene dicho nombre. Es necesario que indiques alguna fuente de los datos para que otros usuarios puedan verificarlo. Esto puedes hacerlo añadiendo la fuente en la vía o en el conjunto de cambios según veas más conveniente.
Un saludo y gracias por tus contribuciones.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152326930
jefe76 (2024-06-07 07:28:36+00:00): ¡Hola! Hay un cartel en el mismo camino, donde se describe: lo he subido en twitter en este hilo: https://x.com/FdezArias/status/1798975371695534517.
Un saludo.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152326930
kapazao (2024-06-07 08:10:26+00:00): Perfecto, gracias por la referencia. Si quieres puedes añadirla como etiqueta source en la misma vía y así cualquier usuario conocerá esto.
Un saludo
miluethi (2024-06-06 11:43:20+00:00): Hi Uzma,

Please square out all buildings. Select a building shape and press the "Q" key. That's it.

Please don't connect building shapes to highways or administrative boundaries.

Thank you for contributing to OSM Nicaragua.
miluethi (2024-06-06 11:45:22+00:00): Hi Swatilekha,

Please square out all your building shapes. It's easy: select a building shape and press "Q" key. 

Also please don't connect buildings with highways or administrative boundaries.

Thank you for contributing to OSM Nicaragua.
miluethi (2024-06-06 11:40:56+00:00): AngryAdmin,

Please square out all your buildings. It's easy, just select a shape and press the "Q" key.

Thank you for contributing to OSM Nicaragua.
Lolo92210 (2024-06-28 13:02:35+00:00): What is that ?
A35K (2024-06-06 11:45:36+00:00): Bitte die lokale Beschilderung beachten 
https://imgur.com/a/a8po7BN

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152327992
miluethi (2024-06-06 12:34:54+00:00): Hi AngryAdmin,

Some of your building shapes are far bigger than the satellite imagery. I'm going to delete them.

Please narrow down your shapes to match exactly the satellite imagery. Thanks.
AngryAdmin (2024-06-06 13:13:22+00:00): Hey @miluethi ,

I was trying to shape around the building as I saw it on the map view. I did not know it had to match exactly, however I tried to match the shape from the image.
miluethi (2024-06-08 22:32:22+00:00): There is no perfect match, the satellite imagery is just not good enough. Try to keep the shapes as close to the building as possible.
Most building are square. Select a building shape and press the "Q" key.
Thanks
Warin61 (2024-06-08 02:48:46+00:00): Multipolygon outer ways cannot share the same segments.
See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=151.20230&lat=-33.85839&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Possibly a site relation could be used.
❤️‍🔥 (2024-06-10 05:54:03+00:00): sorry, it's fixed now
Warin61 (2024-06-10 07:38:23+00:00): No need to apologise! 

Thanks for fixing it. Been past it a few times never bothered to map it. Not going to this years Vivid either .. went last year and it was jam packed. I'll go next year, might have improved pedestrian traffic by them..
❤️‍🔥 (2024-06-11 10:50:36+00:00): haha it was just as jam packed this time... maybe the new metro line will help next year
Frans S (2024-06-15 10:16:44+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please follow the tagging instructions on the main sheet. Tracks never connects buildings. Use service tag when a small roads leads off another highway to buildings, farms etc.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152328669
fititnt (2024-06-07 00:12:36+00:00): Olá @OttoR.

Por que você deletou essa via (que ainda está visível por imagem aérea, adicionada um ano atrás pelo @Pozzer) https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1093944270/history ?
OttoR (2024-06-20 07:52:10+00:00): Please comment in English. The translator doesn't make sense.
fititnt (2024-06-20 16:38:17+00:00): Olá. Nesse país a maioria da população fala apenas português (e isso inclui o criador da way/1093944270, que foi deletada). É por isso que estou usando português.

Se você não entende português (nem mesmo com ajuda de tradução automática), por favor contacte os organizadores da atividade "#hotosm-project-16863" para que o auxilíem.

E sim, volta a pergunta: Por que você deletou essa via (que ainda está visível por imagem aérea, adicionada um ano atrás pelo @Pozzer) https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1093944270/history ?
OttoR (2024-06-20 18:30:09+00:00): Ok, nou dan praten we dus langs elkaar heen. Ik heb geen idee wat je zegt; maar ik hoop dat het goed met je gaat en ik neem aan dat je betere lokale kennis hebt dan ik; dus doe vooral wat jou goed dunkt. Succes! En al het goeds gewenst. Doei!
fititnt (2024-06-21 12:52:25+00:00): - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1093944270/history

https://gist.githubusercontent.com/fititnt/2df377f5e2eb147d9bd71d46d78d2977/raw/6462c94c45e7db621e3a239f88340189b3944a77/osm-org_changeset-152328725_1.png
fititnt (2024-06-07 00:06:21+00:00): Olá @OttoR (e demais da atividade #hotosm-project-16863)

Por que você deletou https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1093944263/history (parte do projeto GPS rural)?

Pergunto porque essa é visível que anda existe no mapa
OttoR (2024-06-20 07:47:04+00:00): Hi Fitint,
I am not speaking portuguese. I guess you are asking why I deleted that specific road? Because based on the satelite imagery there was no road anymore.
Feel free to revert if you have recent local knowledge that the road is actually there.
fititnt (2024-06-20 16:20:23+00:00): Ok. Could you please share the screen where this is not visible?

I checked again. Since your changeset says "source=Bing", I'm loading "Bing aerial imagery"

this is the result:

https://gist.githubusercontent.com/fititnt/2df377f5e2eb147d9bd71d46d78d2977/raw/4457f01c6f300c3e330fd57cb61ce8ec78997909/osm-org_changeset-152328819_1.png

Please note that semantics of highway=service (or the more specific highway=service+service=driveway) is perfectly valid as a minor road leading to a specific property. For already existing roads added previously to the activity, if service roads are not clear for an organized editing "#hotosm-project-16863", then please contact the organizers and ask for support from them.

Waiting,
Rocha
Patr1k_P (2024-06-14 19:23:42+00:00): predajcov stačilo len presunúť na správnu adresu, mazanie a vytváranie nových nie je zrovna ideálny postup
NeisBot (2024-06-06 12:12:24+00:00): Hi Fеlinar Vechi, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/node/11960733534

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
Fеlinar Vechi (2024-06-06 12:20:18+00:00): you're right, i'm just learning how to use this service and maps. indeed there is no beach. we can remove that point
WoodWoseWulf (2024-06-06 20:29:24+00:00): Removed beach in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152348997
george1201 (2024-06-06 13:32:45+00:00): Ich denke, dass man auch alle Kontaktdaten (TelNr, Öffnungszeiten, Website usw.) aus dem disused-Knoten entfernen kann. Sind ja an dieser Stelle nicht mehr gültig.
fititnt (2024-06-06 23:55:52+00:00): Olá @dpvile (e demais participantes do #hotosm-project-16884)

Qual é a fonte para edições como

- bulding=hut https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1289999511/history
- bulding=house https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1289999495/history
- building=farm_auxiliary https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1289999500/history

?

Pelo seu changeset, apenas é declarado `imagery_used=Bing Maps Aerial;unknown.geojson`, porém a não ser que consiga explicar como isso sozinho permite especificar tipos de edificações (sem ter nem mesmo conhecimento local) o que está mapeando é fictício.
dpvile (2024-06-07 07:47:59+00:00): My apologies. The farm showed many tracks such as agricultural tracks and was located in a position likrly to be a farm.
The hut was a very small building in a location surrounded by trees on the land. 
The houses appear consistant with redidential, along a valid road. However I understand, and I shall only categorise buildings as buildings from now on.
Thank you for your feedback
Filip009 (2024-06-07 20:41:13+00:00): Prečo je tam povolený vstup pre peších, resp. viete prečo tam je nastavený zákaz vstupu všetkým na tej ceste?
jbcharron (2024-06-16 20:10:32+00:00): Bonjour Diana,
Merci pour vos contributions :)
Je me permet de faire une petite remarque sur vos contributions, le nom du lieu ne doit pas être le description du lieu, car le tag amenity=marketplace indique déja à l'utilisateur que c'est un marché.
Si le marché n'a pas de nom particulier, il est préférable de ne pas renseigner ce champ.
Bonne soirée à vous
dpolovinkin (2024-06-27 02:27:51+00:00): Здравствуйте, вы мапили здания в Улан-Удэ и оттуда заметил что вы не оставляете полезных комментариев с инфой что именно изменено, "внесение изменений на карту" и так в любом случае происходит, а инфы что было сделано 0.

На будущее - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Good_changeset_comments
canfe (2024-08-18 08:29:12+00:00): Hai aggiunto un'area Rocca di Lities bare rock sopra ad un'area con identico tag ed è la way 200927512
Dovresti sistemarla, non ci possono essere due aree identiche soprapposte.
Patchanka (2024-06-08 08:58:16+00:00): bonjour @Ville de Saint-Martin de Seignanx

Merci pour les ajouts.
Attention sur plusieurs objets, il n'y a que un nom (name) et aucun tag qui indique ce que c'est.

* Pinaquy / Duhalde (??)
* Bergerat Monnoyeur Travaux Publics
* Seignanx Motoculture 

Quelques pistes sur le wiki :

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:craft%3Dbuilder

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:shop%3Dagrarian
Ville de Saint-Martin de Seignanx (2024-06-10 08:31:53+00:00): Merci pour ces informations.
Filip009 (2024-06-07 20:56:43+00:00): Zdravím, keďže ste pridal autoservis aj na vedľajšiu budovu, vytvoril ste duplicitu. Prehodil som prevádzku na bod.

Adresy prosím nemeňte, takto ich má v registri adries zapísané mesto.
aseidel (2024-06-11 11:11:09+00:00): Liebe SonjaH,
bitte bei hw=path (bzw. allen Wegen, die für nicht-zweispurigen Verkehr angelegt sind) immer die Breite mit angeben.
Danke und herzliche Grüße
Antje Seidel
#lgmaps
SimplexKabel (2024-06-06 12:46:54+00:00): Dieses Wohngebäude besteht über 10 Jahre.