piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Osmwithspace (2025-01-14 08:52:50+00:00): Bitte achte darauf, Telefonnummern in der richtigen Schreibweise anzugeben:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:phone
matze089 (2025-01-14 09:03:05+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis.
SomeoneElse (2026-07-10 17:09:59+00:00): Hello,
"surface=2" was presumably a typo for something - any idea what?
Best Regards,
Andy
Yavotch (2026-07-14 09:08:25+00:00): Obvious type, just the field remained in focus when I pressed 2 to start new path. Thanks for pointing. Got it fixed
SomeoneElse (2026-07-17 14:14:52+00:00): Thanks!
eggie (2024-12-24 19:17:28+00:00): Hi ItaliA,

I don't think the streetname is Maasdeltatunnel.
There is already:
tunnel:name	Maasdeltatunnel

The former mapper is an experienced infra mapper. 

Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2024-12-25 06:24:06+00:00): Reverted for now by changeset #160593862

Please contact the former mapper
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/JeroenvanderGun

Greetz,
eggie
JeroenvanderGun (2024-12-25 14:03:40+00:00): The tunnel name is indeed not the street name here. For more information, see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Straatnamen_in_Nederland
felipeeugenio (2024-12-25 12:32:45+00:00): Hola. El nombre de la calle fue cambiado a Nueva Ñuñoa hace unos días.
saludos
felipeeugenio (2024-12-25 13:14:36+00:00): dejado como estaba antes. Acabo de ver que revirtieron el cambio.
saludos
Makeena (2024-12-24 19:00:09+00:00): Note: the relations have only been edited to get access to the streets they were lying on in the iD editor, they have been reset after editing the streets
RedAuburn (2024-12-24 18:55:42+00:00): (it is actually unlit, this isn't tagging for renderer)
felipeeugenio (2024-12-25 12:25:12+00:00): Hola. Cuando algo ya no exista, por favor borrar todo menos la dirección. La dirección sigue existiendo.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160585611
wilco83 (2024-12-30 02:40:11+00:00): ¡Disculpas! Tiene toda la razón. Normalmente no actúo de manera tan brusca, pero no estuve atento. Gracias por corregirme.
felipeeugenio (2024-12-30 11:10:38+00:00): No importa. Ya lo repuse. Gracias por la actitud.
saludos
NorthCrab_upload (2024-12-24 19:20:50+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1346048906

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
mueschel (2024-12-25 13:56:03+00:00): Hi,
the tag "recycling:gft" is not used in other places - what can be recycled here?
jb54osm (2024-12-25 14:38:44+00:00): Hi,

GFT-waste is a common term in The Netherlands. It stands for
Groente (vegetables)
Fruit (fruit)
Tuin (garden).

Another term you might encounter is PMD:
Plastic (plastic packaging)
Metaal (small metal stuff)
Drinkpakken (drink cartons (juice, milk etc)).
mueschel (2024-12-25 14:42:46+00:00): recycling:pmd is defined in the Wiki.

GFT is covered by recycling:green_waste: "All green garden waste and also vegetables and fruit from our own consumption"
jb54osm (2024-12-25 14:47:38+00:00): Aha, I'll change the GFT to green_waste in the Prinsenhof area (the area where I did updates).
𒂼𒄄　 (2024-12-24 22:11:06+00:00): مرحباً، لماذا قمت بحذف الاسم الانجليزي؟ https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/288620253/history
Renas Azad (2024-12-24 22:21:48+00:00): اهلا وسهلا
لم احذف الاسم الانجليزي، انما عدلته الى اللغة المحلية لاهل المنطقة.
بالامكان اضافة الاسم الانجليزي تحت وسم (name:en)
هذا وفق قوانين و تعليمات منصة openstreetmap
شكرا على التعليق
𒂼𒄄　 (2024-12-24 22:24:11+00:00): انت حذفت الاسم الانجليزي كليا ولم تنقله الى name:en 
لايوجد اي اسم انجليزي الان. 
الرجاء عدم حذف اسماء بلغات اخرى لمناطق سكنية.
Renas Azad (2024-12-24 22:31:30+00:00): عزيزي
انا عدلت الخطا فقط، انا لم احذف، لو كنت وضعت الاسم الانجليزي في مكانه الصحيح كان لك الحق في محاسبتي.
𒂼𒄄　 (2024-12-24 22:36:53+00:00): حسنا، هناك بعض سوء الفهم، انا قمت بمشاهدة   
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/288620253/history     
والتي كانت تحتوي على اسم انجليزي ومن ثم تم حذف الاسم كليا عند تغييره الى لغة اخرى.    
وانت ربما واعتقد تقصد ان الاسم بالاصل موجود على النقطة    
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2488229307    
كان من المفترض ان تقوم بحذف الاسم وتغيير تاق المنطقة 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/288620253/history   
وارجاعها الى     
landuse=residential    
لان الان حاليا موجود 2 place=village
وهذا خاطيء، يمكنك الاطلاع على التعليمات بخصوص التكرار هنا:       
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
𒂼𒄄　 (2024-12-24 22:38:51+00:00): لقد قمت باصلاح المشكلة:  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160589480    
تحياتي
Fizzie-DWG (2025-01-27 02:33:28+00:00): DWG revert - Google Maps used as Source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161801839
hotseventyfive (2025-01-02 18:27:25+00:00): The rhine Valley freight relief line is NOT a high speed line. it will have a maximum speed of 160 km/h, as it will only be used by freight.
eggie (2024-12-24 20:20:29+00:00): Dag 2nk

Maak altijd verbindingsnodes bij kruisende wegen. Zie foutmeldingen. 
Het zal anders niet routeren.
Ik heb dat nu even gedaan.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=160586455
MVG
eggie
mapper377 (2024-12-24 20:42:29+00:00): Survey date was 2024-12-22.
scarapella (2025-02-21 10:52:48+00:00): Hello,

Thank you for your contributions to openstreetmap. In this change set you removed the piste:type=nordic from a section of Poplar Stream Hurt Service Road 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1233552676#map=17/45.104984/-70.194059

By doing this OSM based maps (gasiagps, Strava, onX, etc.) will no longer see this as a cross country trail.  Since you kept piste:grooming tag and ski=yes I suspect this was not your intended outcome.

Cheers
scarapella
scarapella (2025-02-27 22:54:19+00:00): Hi,

Additionally, you've removed highway=path from some sections such as the path from flagstaff hut to big eddy
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/324624766

Doing this means effectively that it's not long a path usable for hiking or biking.  As you still have bicycle=yes
and foot=yes + this is marked as hike, ski, snowshoe path on your maps
https://mainehuts.org/trail-maps/

I think this is almost certainly not the behavior you intend. 

Cheers,
Scarapella
aduxas (2025-04-07 14:27:09+00:00): Are you sure the gate is locked, and that this is private?  The official city property maps say it's public.  See https://maps.providenceri.gov/2023/Providence-final-plots-2023-30x36_33.pdf
user_22315447 (2025-04-07 15:14:34+00:00): The first half of the road is open (marked with the box). The second half is blocked by a locked gate. Perhaps my edit came through incorrectly.
aduxas (2025-04-07 18:29:37+00:00): I suppose you're right.  Oddly, the city's property map shows this part of the road colored as parking lot.  I was there too some time ago but can't remember if the gate was closed.  The Google streetview car went straight in.  I'll try to find more info.
aduxas (2025-04-07 19:54:46+00:00): I find this: https://data.nereval.com/PropertyDetail.aspx?town=Providence&accountnumber=17379&card=1.  It confirms the lot area is 10,800 sqf, which is 120x90.  If the property had included the street, the area would have been 120x(90+35) = 15,000, see my first link.
user_22315447 (2025-04-07 20:37:08+00:00): There is a gate across the road that is locked during non-business hours. Is there an option for that? Unfortunately for those of us who venture forth on weekends, we get no access.
aduxas (2025-04-07 21:29:05+00:00): There is a tag "opening_hours" for a gate but this secondary here.  The question is whether the access is public or not.  The only thing I would remove is locked=yes.  I doubt it's worth the effort pursuing the exact status of the street.  Happy wandr'ing.
Taya_S (2024-12-25 07:42:08+00:00): You might want to take a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/852582385
I think you tagged the wrong way
NorthCrab_upload (2024-12-24 20:31:00+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12450067853

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eggie (2024-12-24 20:32:55+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback   Probeer concreet aan te geven wat je hebt toegevoegd. As seen zegt niemand iets. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
sander_buiten (2024-12-24 20:47:41+00:00): Duidelijk; ga nu proberen te vinden hoe ik dat nog aan kan passen. Je zult wel gezien hebben dat ik dezelfde opmerking op 3 plaatsen gemaakt heb.
eggie (2024-12-24 20:50:48+00:00): Sander.. Je hoeft het niet aan te passen. Het is gewoon een tip.
Veel plezier met mappen..
Groet..
eggie
mike140 (2025-01-12 21:43:35+00:00): У вас тут розірвався кордон міста: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1792913
Аватар13 (2025-01-12 22:25:24+00:00): дякую що побачили. певно не вбачив при редагуванні. тепер виправлено, надіюсь.
zstadler (2025-09-19 06:51:08+00:00): שלום ggefen,

תודה על תרומתך למיפוי!

בעריכה זו מחקת את רכס הר גזם
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/503338248

זה היה בטעות?
ggefen (2025-09-24 19:04:16+00:00): 
לא מחקתי כלום לפחות שנה. אם משהו נמחק אז זה היה בטעות.
כל השבילים שאני מסמן הם שבילים שהלכתי בהם בפועל.
יש משתמש מציק בשם hatul שמוחק שבילים שסימנתי בטענות שונות. לפעמים אני מסמן מחדש ולפעמים אין לי כוח
zstadler (2025-09-25 07:22:53+00:00): תודה על התגובה!

שחזרתי את הרכס שנמחק בטעות
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172425105
Константин Гам (2025-02-21 11:15:23+00:00): Вы зря убираете highway=living_street, он полезен.
 знак, по моим данным, на месте. 
Пожалуйста, не надо так.
stillhart (2024-12-25 14:07:38+00:00): ♥️
stillhart (2024-12-25 14:07:22+00:00): ♥️
woodpeck_repair (2024-12-29 09:48:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 160742400 where the changeset comment is: revert unexplained building deletion/adding of zoning data in Colombia, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17016
NorthCrab_upload (2024-12-24 21:31:05+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12450159795

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2024-12-24 21:31:04+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2824202867
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/392249909

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
nevw (2024-12-25 21:03:51+00:00): Hi, osmi detects a self intersection when you draw it like this
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=151.44164&lat=-33.44552&zoom=19
nevw (2024-12-25 21:06:05+00:00): Or this view
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1346065387#map=19/-33.445528/151.441648
cmarriott (2024-12-25 21:36:20+00:00): Oh that’s good to know! Thanks for the tip, @nevw - I’ll update it tomorrow 👌🏼
Dindia (2026-01-20 20:11:47+00:00): FYI: The paths were incorrectly set as FOOT PATH. This is incorrect according to : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dfootway .


Footways tend to be constructed and either paved or with smooth surface (compacted, wood or similar). The elderly and small children and wheelchair users can use them with ease. They tend to be in urban settings. access=* is normally designated for pedestrians, which is often specified by street signs (or implied by local law).

Paths kept mainly by people repeatedly walking on them, or those that are only minimally constructed, are usually tagged as highway=path. Their surface might be uneven (typically ground) and one might need to be physically fit and situationally aware to use them. They tend to be located outside of urban enviromnent. Hiking trails are a typical example 

I fixed it by setting to PATH
eggie (2024-12-24 21:45:16+00:00): Dag Sander Je vraagt feedback.
Lijkt me correct.
motor_vehicle=yes is trouwens default op wegen.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-12-24 21:58:49+00:00): Je kunt wel het tracktype=grade? Nog toevoegen.
Zie wiki tracktype
eggie (2024-12-24 21:59:59+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Key:tracktype
woodpeck_repair (2024-12-29 09:48:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 160742400 where the changeset comment is: revert unexplained building deletion/adding of zoning data in Colombia, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17016
Dindia (2026-01-20 20:11:36+00:00): FYI: The paths were incorrectly set as FOOT PATH. This is incorrect according to : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dfootway .


Footways tend to be constructed and either paved or with smooth surface (compacted, wood or similar). The elderly and small children and wheelchair users can use them with ease. They tend to be in urban settings. access=* is normally designated for pedestrians, which is often specified by street signs (or implied by local law).

Paths kept mainly by people repeatedly walking on them, or those that are only minimally constructed, are usually tagged as highway=path. Their surface might be uneven (typically ground) and one might need to be physically fit and situationally aware to use them. They tend to be located outside of urban enviromnent. Hiking trails are a typical example 

I fixed it by setting to PATH
IvanBabić (2024-12-27 08:58:58+00:00): Reverted because an unnecessary node was made #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160666537
J Erwin (2025-02-28 17:13:42+00:00): Mr Cubbe. When you change the classification on these can you also adjust the access? All these sections of Rte 1 in Sharon, Walpole, Norwood, etc now appear as open for pedestrians and bikes which they are decidedly not.
Mazda05 (2024-12-27 08:21:12+00:00): закон 3005-IX у статті 4, частині другої, забороняє присвоєння цих назв об'єктам, а не змінює назви всім об'єктам, ба більше тим, які не є на обліку географічних об'єктів на офіційному рівні
habi (2025-04-03 15:05:20+00:00): Ciao Makeena
Here you've added `bicycle=y` to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1136928588
I'm assuming this should be `=yes` and changed that accordinly.
Greetings,
habi
woodpeck_repair (2024-12-29 09:48:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 160742400 where the changeset comment is: revert unexplained building deletion/adding of zoning data in Colombia, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17016
Langlaeufer (2025-01-08 14:22:02+00:00): Warum access:conditional=no? Wann oder für wen ist das befahren erlaubt?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160589724
Baloo Uriza (2024-12-26 14:17:07+00:00): This way should have been split first.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160589985
mcliquid (2024-12-26 17:25:04+00:00): Revert of Changeset because addr:place already existed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160646923
compdude (2025-04-11 17:50:41+00:00): Why did you change the freeway ramps at I-95 exit 66 from motorway_link to trunk? It is standard practice in the US to tag all freeway exit ramps as motorway_link, even if they carry a highway route designation.
Jordi MF (2024-12-26 23:19:52+00:00): Hola.

El comentario de este conjunto de cambios no es lo suficientemente descriptivo para que el resto de usuarios se hagan una idea de cuáles han sido los elementos que se han editado. Por favor, consulta la siguiente página para saber como hacer comentarios que faciliten el trabajo de revisión de ediciones: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenos_comentarios_en_conjuntos_de_cambios

Gracias por tus aportes a OpenStreetMap.

Un saludo.
DD1GJ (2024-12-26 23:34:28+00:00): Revert wg. unzulässiger Quelle GDI-Th, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160647007
NorthCrab_upload (2024-12-25 00:30:56+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12450298755

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
DD1GJ (2024-12-26 23:34:22+00:00): Revert wg. unzulässiger Quelle GDI-Th, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160647007
ion_chi (2024-12-30 23:00:35+00:00): I don't think this is correct. leisure=track is for dedicated running tracks. The lakefront trail isn't specifically for running and is part of a broader network of paths
nickvet419 (2024-12-31 00:02:16+00:00): The way marked with leisure=track is the marked track designated for pedestrians combined use of walking or running that was marked seporatly from the marked cycleway as part of the lakefront trail.  How would you tag that?
nickvet419 (2024-12-31 00:04:56+00:00): Lakefront trail also includes the parallel non marked, non paved running track at grant park.
nickvet419 (2024-12-31 00:32:21+00:00): I presented the question to the OSM Slack community at https://osmus.slack.com/archives/C2VJAJCS0/p1735605042194539
nickvet419 (2024-12-31 03:43:09+00:00): There seems to be no specific tagging scheme for a running track that is not made for competition. I would say leave it as leisure=track and highway=path because it was specifically designed and marked for joggers/walkers to separate them from the cycle trail and double as a pedestrian path. https://www.chicagoparkdistrict.com/about-us/news/lakefront-trail-separation-project-continues-roosevelt-31st-street
ion_chi (2025-01-02 14:03:51+00:00): I see you switched it to leisure=mixed-use_track. That seems good to me. Thanks for reconsidering!
DD1GJ (2024-12-26 23:34:14+00:00): Revert wg. unzulässiger Quelle GDI-Th, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160647007
Aenet (2024-12-25 01:36:51+00:00): wrong edit summary, should be “25 mph for curve”
Fizzie-DWG (2025-01-27 02:33:22+00:00): DWG revert - Google Maps used as Source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161801837
fopsinyourarea (2024-12-25 02:33:27+00:00): cool :)
aixbrick (2025-01-03 06:53:28+00:00): Hallo,
du hast an der Schönthaler Straße und an der Heisterner Straße dass Tagging des parallelen Geh-/Radwegs von "highway=path" auf "highway=cycleway" geändert. Bitte nicht vom Begriff path/Pfad verwirren lassen. hw=path wird auch für (benutzungspflichtige) kombinierte Geh-/Radwege verwendet, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen_kartieren.
Bitte ändere das wieder zurück.
Gruß
Thomas AC (2025-01-03 09:34:49+00:00): Erledigt
aixbrick (2025-01-03 10:23:35+00:00): Danke
Supaplex (2024-12-29 08:07:56+00:00): 直耶穌教會信義教會->真耶穌教會信義教會
Fizzie-DWG (2025-01-27 02:33:13+00:00): DWG revert - Google Maps used as Source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161801834
archpdx (2024-12-26 19:21:51+00:00): Hi,

I noticed that this and subsequent changesets splits Powell into a dual carriageway. It appears that Powell only has a painted median for most of these stretches, however roads should only be mapped as dual carriageways when there's a physical barrier present (see https://osm.wiki/Dual_carriageway). To be fair I haven't really been paying close attention when driving on Powell these past few months so things might've changed since then.
Moonfire (2024-12-29 22:45:49+00:00): While it's true large parts that I've split here do not have a median, I felt the relatively short distances between median sections and the general trend toward installing more medians along this road warranted committing to fully splitting it. The longest stretch between any manner of median from the Ross Island Bridge to 99th Ave is about 420 meters, a little over 5 Portland blocks. I've done similar work along Airport Way and will review other parts of Powell and a few other areas where there are multiple short sections split into dual carriageways to estimate if they will be better represented as continuous single or dual carriageways. In particular, I aim to clean up areas represented in one of these styles in sections as short as 30 meters.
archpdx (2025-01-02 01:26:13+00:00): Thanks for the clarification! I'm of the opinion that stretches roughly longer than a Portland block (200 ft) shouldn't be left as a dual carriageway, however you do make a good point about the increased difficulty of maintaining relations and lane tagging as more medians get installed. I know that this can be pretty subjective, so I might start a thread on Slack to give others a chance to chime in.
people128256 (2025-04-24 16:12:01+00:00): Has there been on update on this discussion?
Fizzie-DWG (2025-01-27 02:33:08+00:00): DWG revert - Google Maps used as Source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161801831
Kri_ttt (2024-12-25 04:37:59+00:00): http://irrigation.rid.go.th/rid16/oe16/2016/design/images/conbook/9%20โครงการท่อระบายน้ำบ้านเกาะมุกต์.pdf
dreua (2025-01-03 14:43:18+00:00): Hi, bin gerade hier über die "retaining wall" gestolpert, sieht auf der Karte recht auffällig aus durch die Form. Nur ein paar kleine Anmerkungen zu dem ansonsten sehr schönen Mikromapping hier:
- Die "retaining wall" hat eine Richtung und ich glaub die ist hier Falsch herum. (in iD Shortcut v zum drehen)
- Den Weg würde ich dann bis zur Garageneinfahrt verlängern, so ist direkt klar was das ist. Am Ende gerne eine Node für die Tiefgarageneinfahrt.
- Der das Haus querende Wegteil ist vermutlich eine Passage / Tunnel.

Sag gerne kurz Bescheid ob du hier selber weiter arbeitest oder ob ich das übernehmen soll.
LG David
ManuelB701 (2025-01-03 18:06:54+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis.

Normalerweise hätte ich es auch so gemacht, aber dieses Mal habe ich die Sachen doch schon vergessen.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-01-27 02:33:02+00:00): DWG revert - Google Maps used as Source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161801829
Glassman (2024-12-25 15:19:03+00:00): Why did you remove these driveways if they exist?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160593624
joost schouppe (2025-02-27 13:05:35+00:00): You added landuse=forest to the outer way/141761614 of a forest multipolygon here, so the same forest is mapped twice now. I'll fix it now.
Map_Team (2025-02-28 08:36:57+00:00): Hello,
Hello, What you consider to be an error, is done naturally according to the order in which we operate. There are so many other errors or inaccuracies to correct!
joost schouppe (2025-02-28 12:06:25+00:00): All the more reason not to introduce more of them :)
It is quite rare for it making sense to tag the outer way of a multipolygon. I don't see what you mean with "doing it naturally"
Fizzie-DWG (2025-01-27 02:32:57+00:00): DWG revert - Google Maps used as Source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161801827