piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2025-12-14 07:58:51+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Event location at Eisbach in München"
---
Zum Beispiel könnte eine neutralere und sachlichere Version deiner Beschreibung lauten: "Veranstaltungsort am Eisbach in München"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-12-16 18:14:22+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/175947466
mavl (2025-12-13 02:24:30+00:00): Здравствуйте. Подскажите, пожалуйста, у вас есть разрешение от компании Яндекс на использование её карт в целях уточнения других карт?
mavl (2026-01-04 06:31:55+00:00): Это пакет правок отменён по причине использования несовместимого источника данных.
NeisBot (2025-12-14 07:59:50+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Eventlocation im Glockenbachviertel München"
---
Zum Beispiel könnte eine neutralere und sachlichere Version deiner Beschreibung lauten: "Eventlocation im Glockenbachviertel München"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-12-16 18:14:58+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/175947548
wouterko (2025-12-27 13:10:40+00:00): Hi Jelv, dit betrof niet de website van de locatie maar een verzamelsite met de nodige (spam) advertenties. Ik heb deze aangepast.
Jelv (2025-12-27 13:16:06+00:00): Goed gezien! Kom de site wel vaker tegen bij schoonheidssalons, zal erop letten.
MaliMrav (2025-12-13 13:49:05+00:00): Da li su KONJEVIC RESIDENCE DELUXE, KONJEVIC RESIDENCE i ВИЦЕНТИЦ РЕСИДЕНЦЕ (sic) privatni objekti? Ako jesu, potrebno je ukloniti nazive, jer taj nivo detaljnosti nije poželjan na OpenStreetMap-u.
silversurfer83 (2026-01-29 16:41:37+00:00): Hi :)

da ich grad hinter einem neuen Account herräume ist mir ein großes Landuse aufgefallen welches mit highways verklebt wurde und das teilweise schon vor 10 Jahren passierte.

Bitte (!) verklebe landuse niemals mit der Linie eines highways. Es ist unglaublich ekelhaft zu bearbeiten und Neulinge machen dann ganz viel Grütze.

Die Linie eines Highways repräsentiert die Mitte des Weges. Es ist also physikalisch nicht möglich, dass ein Acker in der Mitte einer Landstraße endet. (nur als Beispiel genommen)

Grüße
silversurfer83
silversurfer83 (2026-01-29 19:16:37+00:00): https://osmcha.org/changesets/171960819?filters=%7B%22users%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%22Voduhanasor%22%2C%22value%22%3A%22Voduhanasor%22%7D%5D%2C%22date__gte%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%22%22%2C%22value%22%3A%22%22%7D%5D%7D

da kannst du gut sehen, was passiert, wenn landuse=* an highway=* geklebt wird.
Hoschmi72 (2026-01-30 06:23:39+00:00): Sorry, aber das ist nur dann sinnvoll wenn die Verkehrsflächen auch mit landuse=highway gemappt werden. Das Mapping mit Lücken rund um die Straßen ist inkonsitent und unlogisch.
silversurfer83 (2026-01-30 06:31:08+00:00): Danke für die Rückmeldung.

Ich muss sagen, dass du mit dieser Aussage auf sehr einsamen Posten stehst. Der große Konses ist, dass es absolut OK ist, weiße Flächen zu haben und dass landuse NICHT  mit Highway verbunden wird.

Daher meine eindringliche Bitte: Lass das bitte. 

Danke.
Hoschmi72 (2026-01-30 06:41:27+00:00): Kann sein dass das eine Minderheitsmeinung ist. Aber bisher konnte mir auch noch niemand schlüssig erklären was dagegegen spricht die Straßen auch als Flächen zu mappen. Zumal das bei Bahngelände ja auch genau so gemacht wird.
silversurfer83 (2026-01-30 07:00:09+00:00): Du kannst die Highways gerne *zusätzlich* als Fläche erfassen. Daran kann wegen mir auch anderer Landuse anschließen.

Das hat aber nichts damit zu tun, dass landuse nicht an die Highway Linie geklebt werden soll.
aixbrick (2025-12-12 12:28:18+00:00): Hallo,
ich habe deine heutigen Änderungen hier rückgängig gemacht, da es einer Klärung bedarf (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175843970).
Was genau befindet sich in dem Gebäude? Das Bundeswehr-DLZ und/oder die "Bw Bekleidungsmanagement GmbH". Davon hängt ab, wie das gemappt werden soll(te).
Du schreibst als Kommentar "Erhebung unserer Dienstorte". Das klingt nach organisiertem Mapping. In dem Fall muss https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Organised_Editing_Guidelines beachtet und dein Account kenntlich gemacht werden.
Gruß
Dirk D'Agostino (2025-12-12 12:51:51+00:00): In dem Gebäude befindet sich nur die Bw Bekleidungsmanagement GmbH, die eine Inhousegesellschaft des Bundesministerium der Verteidigung ist.
aixbrick (2025-12-12 13:40:12+00:00): Das widerspricht aber der Tatsache, dass das DLZ eine eigene Website hat: https://www.bundeswehr.de/de/organisation/infrastruktur-umweltschutz-und-dienstleistungen/organisation-iud/bundeswehr-dienstleistungszentren/bwdlz-aachen.
Dirk D'Agostino (2025-12-12 13:57:50+00:00): Wie hier nachzulesen https://bwbm.de/service/standorte/servicestandorte , ist unserer Dienstsitz hier ebenfalls. Dies ist auch klar auf dem Gebäudebild der o.g. Seite zu sehen (Wegweiserschild mittig im Bild unten)
aixbrick (2025-12-12 14:51:02+00:00): Ich habe beide Einrichtungen als separate Nodes erstellt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175849851.
Grundsätzlich gilt: Befinden sich mehrere Einrichtungen in einem Gebäude, sollten diese als Nodes erfasst werden. Bitte nicht einfach vorhandene Informationen überschreiben.
Ich habe die "Bw Bekleidungsmanagement GmbH" zusätzlich mit "access=private" + "description" versehen, da es sich um kein öffentliches Geschäft handelt.
Ich empfehle, das auch für die anderen Standorte in Erwägung zu ziehen.
Gregory Peony (2025-12-15 04:30:48+00:00): you can see some changes I made to the data here in https://osmcha.org/changesets/175941918
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175842094
SomeoneElse (2025-12-13 20:25:01+00:00): Hello Calasanz,
Andy from OSM's Data Working Group here.  Thanks for adding a Wikimedia Commons image of the street sign of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/529079441 .  As you can see from https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/osm-deep-history/#/way/529079441 , the name has been changed back and forth over the years.
However, I would suggest leaving the "name:ca" and "name:es" versions if they are correct (which they presumably are).  Having all of the language names for a street allows people consuming the data to make makes in different languages.  If you removing name:es, they won't know what the Spanish name is since nothing defines what language "name" is.
 Best Regards,
SomeoneElse (2025-12-13 20:25:43+00:00): Hola Calasanz, soy Andy, del Grupo de Trabajo de Datos de OSM. 
Gracias por añadir una imagen de Wikimedia Commons de la señal de calle way/529079441. Como pueden ver en https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/osm-deep-history/#/way/529079441, el nombre ha cambiado con el paso de los años.
Sin embargo, sugeriría dejar las versiones "name:ca" y "name:es" si son correctas (que presumiblemente lo son). Tener todos los nombres de idiomas para una calle permite a quienes consultan los datos crear nombres en diferentes idiomas. Si se elimina name:es, no sabrán cuál es el nombre en español, ya que nada define en qué idioma se escribe "name".
Atentamente,
Szymson (2025-12-12 16:57:07+00:00): Skąd wynika wspólne poprowadzenie DK9 z DK74 od węzła Opatów do łącznika północnego? W terenie oznakowanie nie wskazuje by takie coś miało miejsce.
NeisBot (2025-12-12 20:14:21+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 16 potential crossings.

Problematic elements (top 3 by category):
https://osm.org/way/1008078141 v1 | 9 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1430407992 v1 | 4 crossings

Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/7320573471 v5

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=175842929
funnyfaceking (2025-12-12 20:32:17+00:00): A line connects to two areas and won't let go. As I said, it's my first day.  Thanks for the message. Hopefully, someone on Discord can tell me what to do, or someone will come along and fix it themselves.
pitscheplatsch (2025-12-13 16:33:40+00:00): 👍 Should be corrected by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175862139
Futur3r (2025-12-18 01:10:31+00:00): En plus du tag toilets=yes qu'il faut rajouter, tu peux mettre toilets:access=customers pour indiquer que l'accès est que pour la clientèle et donc sous-entend que les protections aussi.

Comme ça pas besoin de description, car le tag description=* est fait pour l'objet sur lequel tu l'utilise et non les toilettes à l'intérieur du café dans ce cas ci.
C'est comme ci tu disais que le café lui même est une protection priorisée pour les client⋅es dans ce que tu a fait.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:toilets
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175843131
Futur3r (2025-12-18 01:04:42+00:00): Comme décrit dans le wiki, un tag toilets:menstrual_products nécessite un tag toilets=yes pour déjà indiquer qu'il y a des toilettes à cet endroit.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:toilets:menstrual_products

D'ailleurs tu peux aussi utiliser le tag toilets:access=customers pour les endroits où les toilettes sont accessible seulement pour les client⋅es.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:toilets
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175843451
NeisBot (2025-12-14 07:59:57+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Dental practice in downtown Austin"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-12-16 18:16:00+00:00): 🔴 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the original contributor or remaining promotional text in description tags by https://osm.org/changeset/176018297
Senihtu (2026-04-16 12:23:05+00:00): Hi!
Mit diesem Laden stimmt etwas nicht.
Entweder stimmt addr:street= Schoßstraße - dann ist der Node hier am falschen Ort. 
Oder der Node ist am richtigen Ort. Dann ist addr:street falsch.
Und ach ja: Saxony Webatlas schreibt die Schloßstraße mit 2 ß. 
Vermutlich kennst Du Dich dort aus (ich nicht!). Wo ist denn nun der Laden?
happy mapping!
schmittlauch (2026-04-20 08:11:10+00:00): Danke fürs finden. Die "Untere Marktstraße" wäre in der Tat korrekt, keine Ahnung was ich damals da verrissen habe (automatischer Straßenvorschlag hat eventuell daneben gegriffen). Ich korrigiere das.
coatix (2025-12-13 07:11:54+00:00): Normalerweise taggt man nicht Features mit amenity und shop gleichzeitig. Vielleicht passt cafe=yes besser?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cafe
Futur3r (2025-12-18 00:51:53+00:00): Bonjour,

Le tag toiles:menstrual_products s'utilise uniquement sur les noeuds amenity=toilets.

C'est décrit dans la page wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:toilets:menstrual_products
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175844272
rempshaener (2025-12-12 21:31:23+00:00): Hallo,

du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Mal kritisch nachgefragt: was soll bei der Änderung von „description“ einem Review unterzogen werden? Bitte setze das Häkchen nur, wenn es wirklich etwas zu prüfen gibt.

Viele Grüße
rempshaener (2025-12-12 21:33:14+00:00): Dennoch eine Anmerkung:
Hat der Parkplatz wirklich einen Namen? Dann fehlt da ein "n".
Viele Grüße
NorthCrab_upload (2025-12-12 13:11:11+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nieprawidłowa wartość addr:postcode. Kod pocztowy powinien być formatu XX-XXX, gdzie X oznacza cyfrę.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/323624927

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
uprkos (2025-12-12 20:25:42+00:00): Zmiana niezgodna z zasadami:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Znakowanie_dr%C3%B3g_w_Polsce#Nazewnictwo_ulic

Do wycofania.
SpinOff (2025-12-17 22:04:58+00:00): Użytkownik @uprkos zwrócił Ci uwagę, że Twoja zmiana jest niepoprawna, podając odnośnik do dokumentacji. Dlaczego nie przywróciłeś poprawnego stanu?
Trần Thanh Tuấn (2025-12-14 15:29:26+00:00): Source: https://www.facebook.com/share/1BdGU34Kh9/
NeisBot (2025-12-14 07:59:59+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Appliance repair service in San Diego"

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description
NeisReview (2025-12-16 18:16:29+00:00): 🔴 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the original contributor or remaining promotional text in description tags by https://osm.org/changeset/176018321
rempshaener (2025-12-12 21:36:07+00:00): Hallo,
ein Wanderweg, der 700 m lang ist?
Das ist nicht der vorgesehene Zweck von type=route
Viele Grüße
trjdjx (2025-12-29 14:10:46+00:00): Hallo,
Dankeschön für den Hinweis. Ich habe es zu einem Spazierweg https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:route%3Dfoot geändert.
Freundliche Grüße
Gicorada (2025-12-14 13:27:49+00:00): Hi, this isn't a gate. I'm not able to specify exactly how this barrier could be tagged (as it's a pole of a traffic sign), but certainly it's not a gate. I'm reverting this.
fndoder (2025-12-12 16:40:01+00:00): > warnings:crossing_ways:building-building

Даже редактор iD выдает предупреждение, что в этом пакете правок ошибка - нарисованы дома поверх уже существующего дома.

Есть один большой дом (который является одним домом и фактически - за счёт общего уровня парковки и согласно общему адресу). Поверх него идут части переменной этажности согласно https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_3D_Buildings

То есть, к примеру, добавленный тут way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1458065060 полностью дублирует существующий ralation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16510105

С учётом этого считаю нужным добавленные дубли удалить.
hatul (2025-12-31 17:01:41+00:00): לפי מה שראיתי הדרך הזו מסומנת בכחול, רק לא הבנתי לאן בדיוק היא ממשיכה.
שמת לב ותוכל לתקן?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/83805897
Frans S (2025-12-12 15:18:10+00:00): Hello, EstherGeo. Long time ago I saw mappins from you. Still busy, I see.
How are you ?
See you next mapping.
quantenschaum (2026-02-10 15:07:26+00:00): Hinweis: Gefahrentonnen (Kardinal/Einzelgefahr) sind immer weiß befeuert, nie gelb.
voschix (2026-05-04 15:28:24+00:00): In questo changeset  hai inserito roba in modo abbastanza impreciso. Inoltre hai indicato Bing come fonte, ma inserito vie che neanche oggi sono visibili su Bing.  Sto correggendo adesso, utilizzando Esri imagery.
Gregory Peony (2025-12-13 17:33:02+00:00): The top footprint looks like it represents a building, but I'm not sure about the bottom one, perhaps it's multiple small adjacent ones that look like a complex shape. thanks for carefully tracing what you saw in the imagery but just know that sometimes there may be things which obscure the true shape of a feature. 

Thank you for your contribution! 

After tracing and tagging features which are likely square or round, please remember to square their corners `q`, or circularise them `o`, because it is almost impossible and time consuming to draw shapes so percisely manually. Buildings with metal or pitched roofs tend to have square corners; round buildings are identifiable by the distinctive cresent shaped shadow they cast. Unless the building is clearly a different shape then it's best to assume that it should be rounded or its corners should be squared. In the ID Editor, you can `right click` for access to editing functions. Since roofs tend to overhang walls trace the initial shape slightly smaller to allow a buffer for any change in size which may occur. In JOSM use the [buildingstools plugin](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/BuildingsTools). In ID you must draw the shape accurately enough if you want every corner to be squared. This [video about squaring features in ID](https://youtu.be/Xs5wX592E1o) has more information and a demo.

Keep on mapping!
Gregory Peony (2025-12-15 08:21:57+00:00): If the features you mapped here are in fact buildings they likely have more regular/ less complex shapes. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175846979
Gregory Peony (2025-12-13 17:12:11+00:00): This footprint represents a building, but could be more accurate see how I mapped it in https://osmcha.org/changesets/175891587
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175847099
ika-chan! (2025-12-31 06:30:32+00:00): Hello, is_in=* and related keys are deprecated in Greece and should not be used at all. If an app is showing the settlement as part of the wrong region or municipality, either file a bug report with them, or contact us at https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/gr/68 and we will check the administrative relations to make sure the settlement is within the correct region or municipality relation.
Gregory Peony (2025-12-15 04:53:20+00:00): Hi, this is a barrier, not a building.

Each footprint should represent a building. Please watch [this video about imagery interpretation](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJ-vUwtS3A8). Sometimes buildings may appear to share a common wall, but this is sometimes an illusion; only map them with shared nodes if you have reason to believe that they really do touch.
Gregory Peony (2025-12-13 17:04:08+00:00): Hi, there is a vhange in coulir here, but I'm not convinced that this footprint represents a building.

Thank you for your contribution! 

Each footprint should represent a building. Please watch [this video about imagery interpretation](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJ-vUwtS3A8). Sometimes buildings may appear to share a common wall, but this is sometimes an illusion; only map them with shared nodes if you have reason to believe that they really do touch.

Keep on mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175847164
ExoMal (2026-03-02 15:04:02+00:00): Hiya mate, did you add a UPRN to the wrong object? You tagged node 6704304046 with UPRN 320331894.
ExoMal (2026-03-02 15:05:48+00:00): Forgot to check further; nodes 336077923 and 4106673092 also have UPRN's added now. All three of these nodes are part of the road, and all have another road/footway connected to them.
philipcullen (2026-03-02 17:27:10+00:00): Hello, I've added those UPRNs are they appear to be the UPRNs for the street record. These tend to be at the end of a road, but can sometimes be elsewhere along the length. I've tried to add them to the point in the road that they have been placed, as they tend to be helpfully well aligned with the centre of the road. There will be a USRN for the roads too, which would need to go on the way for the road, but I've not added these.
ExoMal (2026-03-09 11:59:29+00:00): Thanks for teaching me something new :)
Gregory Peony (2025-12-13 16:56:57+00:00): The building you mapped here is vaid, but oversized.

Thank you for your contribution! 

When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom out to obtain the orientation and shape, then zoom in so that you can accurately draw the footprint. Exclude shadows and yards when tracing the footprint. Keep in mind that you are looking at the [roofs of buildings](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape#Roof_shape), but mapping their footprints. Depending on how the scene is lit, pitched roofs may have light and dark sections that belong to one building. Generally pitched roofs overhang the walls of a building, so a footprint slightly smaller than the roof is accurate. You can scale selected features in ID with `shift+(-/+)`, or JOSM with `ctrl.+alt+Lclick & drag`.  Take care to make contributions that others can build upon.

Keep on mapping!
Gregory Peony (2025-12-15 05:40:05+00:00): Hi, the footprints you mapped here envelop multiple buildings. There are barriers around clusters of buildings here. 

Each footprint should represent a building. Please watch [this video about imagery interpretation](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJ-vUwtS3A8). Sometimes buildings may appear to share a common wall, but this is sometimes an illusion; only map them with shared nodes if you have reason to believe that they really do touch.

Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
rempshaener (2025-12-13 18:56:55+00:00): Hallo,

du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Eine Anmerkung zu waterway=confluence:
Wie in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway=confluence?uselang=de beschrieben, soll  das nur gesetzt werden, wenn es sich um einen einigermaßen gewichtigen Zusammenfluss handelt. Das ist hier offensichtlich nicht der Fall. Meine klare Empfehlung daher ist, waterway=confluence wieder zu entfernen.

Bei Fragen bitte melden.
Viele Grüße
Gregory Peony (2025-12-21 02:25:22+00:00): Hi, you merged a POI representing a settlement to a building footprint. These features are not directly physically linked e.g. if this building were to no longer exist or if it moved that doesn't mean the settlement would too. I undid this.

Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175847430