piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
bxl-forever (2023-04-24 23:34:54+00:00): Hello,

Do I understand that you are merely importing raw data into OSM without ground knowledge?

AFAIK, Burger King took over Quick restaurants some time ago, and I believe it should have been more appropriate to replace the existing node instead of adding a new one beside.

Do you mind having a second look here?
TristanOSM (2023-04-25 06:05:21+00:00): Hello bxl-forever,

I have not imported without ground knowledge. I am mostly adding places I have visited such as this one. I am not a 100% sure there was not a Quick (I did see a KFC as well), but I will check.

Kind regards,
TristanOSM
bxl-forever (2023-04-25 08:36:55+00:00): OK, fine.
TristanOSM (2023-04-25 19:03:53+00:00): I have now removed the Quick restaurant, as a replacement seems most likely: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135356738. I did not see the restaurant, and it is also not mentioned on the website of the chain.
seattlefyi (2023-04-26 23:40:03+00:00): Hi, thanks for helping add some buildings in this area!
defuneste (2023-04-29 01:45:25+00:00): Did not do much, I am never confident doing armchair mapping! Like you I also followed @SmallTownUSA@en.osm.town . It is good idea to add the # in the comment.
seattlefyi (2023-05-01 04:47:09+00:00): Yeah, it's fun to see multiple people contributing to the same location, adding different things rather than going it alone. It does take some time to get comfortable with the remote mapping, but keep at it!
seattlefyi (2023-05-01 04:47:16+00:00): By the way, I've been using rapideditor.org where the imagery looks good/aligned - it can make things quicker & help avoid burnout, while still putting in valid buildings one at a time. Thanks again!
literan (2023-04-24 17:45:10+00:00): дубль: он давно отмечен https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/940002572
muralito (2023-04-23 23:07:31+00:00): Hi. The planetarium was already mapped. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/180398319

Please remember and follow the OSM rule "One feature, one element".
dieterdreist-CAI (2024-01-08 16:22:22+00:00): Buonasera, mi sembra qui: way 281520147 sia stato introdotto un errore, perché cambiando highway=path da bicycle=yes a bicycle=designated si escludono i pedoni. Non ci sono stato ma mi sembra strano perché ci passano sentieri ufficiali e c'é il tag  sac_scale. Confermi che il percorso è vietato per pedoni?

Saluti,
Martin
toponomastica_comune_arenzano (2024-01-11 09:57:05+00:00): Cao Martin non modifico solitamente path mi limito ad applicare le correzioni che josm propone e può essere tale automatismo che ha introdotto quanto nel tuo commento.
dieterdreist-CAI (2024-01-11 12:34:03+00:00): Ciao,
mi sembra strano che Josm indichi un errore per bicycle=yes perché Josm non può sapere se un percorso è aperto anche a bici (yes), oppure è solo aperto a bici (bicycle=designated senza altri access tags). In ogni caso non ti consiglio di fare ciò che suggerisce Josm senza controllarlo, perché sono solo avvertimenti, ma sono non così raramente sbagliati (perché l'errore è un altro, oppure perché non è un errore). Forse la soluzione qui sarebbe stata di aggiungere anche foot=yes e nel caso anche horse=yes. In ogni caso bicycle=designated è da usare soltanto per le piste ciclabili (cartello blu tondo), se senza altri access tag, altrimenti si può usare anche per i percorsi ciclopedonali (segregate e no) ma sempre solo quando sono segnalati con il cartello tondo blu.
Buona mappatura,
Martin
user_5359 (2023-04-25 05:46:03+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1164933273. what is the mean of the tags
ALT_NAME = Flatskjæret;Svartskjæret
FIXME = Choose name: Flatskjæret [skjærISjø 382063], Svartskjæret [skjærISjø 382063]
Who make the cleanup?
harahu (2023-04-25 14:48:59+00:00): The capital letter FIXME is used to allow me to more easily find fixmes tied to the import I did here, so that I can address them without filtering out all other lower case fixmes.

This particular fixme stems from the fact that the Norwegian central place name registry contains two distinct names for this islet, neither of which has priority over the other. This means that the name set on the islet in the import is an arbitrary choice.

The slightly non-standard ALT_NAME tag lists both the currently selected name, as well as the other name which could just as well have been selected. The capitalization is intended to avoid overlapping with the alt_name tag that already has a meaning.

My intention is to clean all of these ones up, but each case takes time and careful consideration, so it might take some time.

In this case it is tempting for me to set name=Flatskjæret;Svartskjæret

But I understand that semicolon separated values for the name tag are not handled well. Any suggestions for working around that?
user_5359 (2023-04-25 17:51:11+00:00): Specifically in the object mentioned, a mention would not have been necessary as alt_name and name are already set with the two values in question and no decision is necessary. These "private" keys should be used extremely sparingly in the production database.    With fixme, one can also query the start letters of the value in the search, an extra notation would definitely not be necessary. I also do not consider pure capital letters to be useful, as there is too much danger that data will be overwritten in the event of unclean corrections. A postfix consisting of an import reference would probably be a better idea.
harahu (2023-04-25 22:12:54+00:00): "Specifically in the object mentioned, a mention would not have been necessary as alt_name and name are already set with the two values in question and no decision is necessary."

I disagree. By setting one name under the "name" tag and another under the "alt_name" one is prioritizing one over the other. I don't have good reason to do so. Hence the fixme.
user_5359 (2023-04-26 03:27:13+00:00): Would this not have been a good idea to clarify before importing? 
Are there any differences from the linguistic origin that could be used in the language code?
But regardless of how you solve your dilemma, you will have to decide how the standard map presents your objects. If you decide to use both notations, names will be suppressed more often because the next name is already waiting to be displayed.
harahu (2023-04-26 15:49:57+00:00): > These "private" keys should be used extremely sparingly in the production database. With fixme, one can also query the start letters of the value in the search, an extra notation would definitely not be necessary. I also do not consider pure capital letters to be useful, as there is too much danger that data will be overwritten in the event of unclean corrections. A postfix consisting of an import reference would probably be a better idea.

Fair point. In hindsight I definitely agree. Will look for a more suitable schema next time. Will probably also port the ones I haven't been able to address during the next week or so.

> Would this not have been a good idea to clarify before importing? 

Yes and no. Most of them were clarified before importing. The remaining ones are the more difficult ones that demand more effort. I deemed the imported data valuable enough that I didn't think it should be gated by a small number of naming questions. On the other hand, maybe I could have left out the names I was unsure about.
harahu (2023-04-26 16:05:47+00:00): > Are there any differences from the linguistic origin that could be used in the language code?

Unfortunately, no. Both names are standard Norwegian, meaning "the flat skerry" and "the black skerry", respectively. Looking at orthophoto, the skerry looks to be both relatively flat and black, so it's hard to argue that one name is more correct than the other.

For reference:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skerry

> If you decide to use both notations, names will be suppressed more often because the next name is already waiting to be displayed.

I'm not intimately familiar with rendering practices for names, so I'm struggling a bit to understand exactly what you mean with suppression here. Could you expand a bit on this?

I see mentioned that Mapbox supports multiple names, but am not sure about carto behaviour. See: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Semi-colon_value_separator#Renderers

As an aside, the section on "Multiple names" in the article for the name key seems somewhat relevant: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name
danieldegroot2 (2023-04-23 21:25:34+00:00): See also this document for an image of the former milk churn stand;
https://www.meath.ie/system/files/media/file-uploads/2019-05/Nobber%20%28Adopted%2024th%20July%2009%29.pdf
divaddivag (2023-04-24 10:07:54+00:00): J'ai changé les tag d'accès sur la base de tes images avec un simple motor_vehicle qui est suffisant et plus compact que de spécifier toutes les catégorie éligibles à ces 2 tronçons.
Pour le nom de la voie, le 'Notre-Dame' est la typo usuelle dans OSM et le 'des Marais' est le nom officiel publié sur la BAN et voté en CM le 23/02 (voir le PV sur le site de la mairie). Au passage les collages/accroches du type highway sur landuse sont largement décriés par la communauté et désormais considérés comme une mauvaise pratique car ils rend les éditions pénibles. Je peux t'envoyer le .mapcss que j'utilise pour détecter ce genre de choses.

Je n'ai pas oublié tout ce que nous avons discuté lors de notre rencontre, cela va venir c'est juste qu'il y a beaucoup à dire :-). T'as vu ce message: https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/normandie-et-velo/14326 ?

 A plus David
Nzau (2023-04-25 12:29:50+00:00): Ah d'accord parfait merci pour tes retours !

Et non je n'avais pas reçu de notif merci pour l'info, je suis également en contact avec Nicolas le secrétaire de l'association Dérailleurs.

A plus Enzo
impiaaa (2023-04-24 18:59:49+00:00): Please don't connect landuse areas directly to highways, it's inaccurate and difficult to edit. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dresidential#Separation_from_roads
jmarchon (2023-04-23 22:39:44+00:00): Oops, looks like we had conflicting edits here. Feel free to change the info back to what you added. Sorry about this.
skyper (2023-05-17 13:44:48+00:00): Hallo Dreisamfuchs,
bei `bicycle=no` braucht es doch keine zusätzliches `cycleway:both=no`, siehe u.a. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27361907 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30412857.
Grüße,
skyper
Jayden26 (2023-04-24 17:01:39+00:00): Might be outdated, if it is, I'm sorry
gpserror (2023-04-23 23:13:34+00:00): reverted node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2597907064 as it contained more recent information about the shop
jmarchon (2023-04-24 01:13:49+00:00): Thanks. What a coincidence that we both edited that node at the same time :)
marc__marc (2023-06-06 23:13:54+00:00): Bonjour,
que veux-dire l'ajout d'objet source=cadastre dans un changeset source=survey ?
Cordialement,
Marc
jmapb (2023-09-01 00:05:14+00:00): Re https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10835701238, this parking area had been mapped as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/854537978 but as far as I know it's been closed for years. Do you have information that's it's been reopened?
jmapb (2023-09-08 12:29:53+00:00): Haven't heard back, so I've removed this parking node and left a note requesting survey.
ottwiz (2023-09-08 13:55:11+00:00): Ohhh! Sorry for not answering back, I onls used imagery and not local knowledge and i'm not local to the area (I'm a couch mapper from Hungary) 

Probably you should ask MapSpot about that, because he knows the area :)
ottwiz (2023-09-08 13:55:31+00:00): *only
MapSpot (2023-09-08 17:19:42+00:00): I haven't been to this location since 2021, but I will confirm if this lot was ever reopened next time I pass through.
mrpulley (2026-02-28 08:22:50+00:00): 293705778 - northern past maxspeed 60, southern part maxspeed 80. Updated at www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176738803
443028968 likely to be 80, but I didn't survey southern end so I've left this alone. I also didn't survey 443028949
Ydel (2023-06-26 20:16:43+00:00): Bonsoir,
Pouvez-vous indiquer à quoi correspondent les objets nommés de de JK 1 à JK 19?
Ils sont renseignés en tant que studios photographiques mais cela me parait peu probable.
Cordialement,
Yann
Vinber-Pro (2026-07-06 14:31:31+00:00): j'ai ouvert le sujet sur le forum pour la carte subjective de Kérinou également  https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/carte-subjective-de-kerinou/44490

coucou @Ydel
Darrman (2023-05-01 18:42:53+00:00): There's no railway here: all that's here is open land.
SK53 (2023-05-23 17:24:32+00:00): Hi,

You seem to be adding things which don't exist. OSM is used by real people to do real things in real life: please dont use it to see how things might be.

Regards,

Jerry aka SK53
MxxCon (2023-04-25 04:49:54+00:00): Would this be a cellphone store or electronics store?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135280518
cserpell (2023-04-24 13:25:32+00:00): Hola, gracias por los cambios. Tengo algunos comentarios que espero te ayuden en los cambios futuros, especialmente al cambiarle el nombre a calles:

- En Avenida La Marina, te quedó un tramo sin cambiar el nombre, en el oriente, cerca del reloj de flores. Para evitar esto, puedes realizar una búsqueda en el editor del nombre original y que te destaca los tramos que faltan por cambiar.
- Al enlace desde Avenida España hacia Avenida La Marina le sacaste el nombre. Me imagino que es porque ese tramo aún está en la Avenida España. Para evitar dejar un tramo de calle sin nombre, una opción es dejar Avenida España, y la otra es dejarlo con la etiqueta "primary_link".
- En el cambio de nombre de Avenida La Marina y en la Avenida Los Castaños, hay un montón de casas o edificios con dirección asociada. Al cambiar de nombre la calle, hay que cambiar el nombre en todas las direcciones también, para que no queden inconsistentes.

Espero que te sirvan los comentarios. Por ahora voy a corregir estas cosas.

Saludos,
highflyer74 (2023-04-24 10:41:04+00:00): Hello! Was this edit intended that way? It says "#hotosm-project-12598 #DurbanFloods" but edits an object in England...
Math1985 (2023-04-24 07:01:49+00:00): Thanks!
38446 (2023-04-24 07:01:24+00:00): Wenn hier regelmäßiger Verkauf stattfindet, könnte auch shop=fuel und fuel=wood gesetzt werden.
Nüsschen (2023-04-24 10:09:32+00:00): Danke!
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-03-27 18:14:36+00:00): Hello!

You used
tee=red;v
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1163513435/history

Have you maybe meant
tee=red
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
watmildon (2023-04-24 18:45:25+00:00): Hello! Thanks for the contribution. You can get this one looking a bit crisper by having the editor "square the corners". Select the building outline and hit the 'q' button. Makes things look really sharp.

If you have other questions feel free to ask. 

Happy mapping!
mariotomo (2023-04-24 19:17:30+00:00): hola, voy revisando el trabajo de los nuevos editores. te hago unas sugerencias iniciales: aprovecha de la posibilidad de describir tus cambios, para presentar tu trabajo a los otros voluntarios que van revisando, como yo en este momento.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

te comento que se ve algo regular la edición, pues los edificios de esta expansión no son todos iguales como los representas, sobra un edificio en la primera línea al occidente, y falta uno en la tercera línea.

sin embargo, como primeras ediciones, no está nada mal. si quieres mejorarlas, con gusto te los vuelvo a revisar.
mariotomo (2023-05-31 19:23:54+00:00): bueno, ni era tan necesario borrarlo todo, como primeras ediciones no estaba nada mal. intentaré recuperarlos y mejorarlos.
Igor Bubelov (2023-04-24 03:23:04+00:00): Hi! What kind of place is that?
Pouch PH (2023-04-25 06:24:35+00:00): Retail
Dimacn (2023-04-24 03:20:52+00:00): Пожалуйста не присоединяйте лес к высоковольтной ЛЭП, это совершенно разные объекты не имеющие соединений. Имею в виду вот этот лес - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1164986475
Dimacn (2023-04-24 03:23:53+00:00): В тег name заносим только названия, а не свойства или описание объекта. Свойства задаются определёнными тегами. Поэтому у поля не может быть название "Поле". В данном случае названия не должно быть. Вот здесь подробнее - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Названия
Dimacn (2023-04-24 03:27:13+00:00): Пожалуйста выравнивайте углы зданий до прямого угла. Это можно сделать кнопкой Q или командой из всплывающего меню. Ваши здания кривые - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1164987452 и https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1164987453
Dimacn (2023-04-24 03:31:15+00:00): Вы вандально удаляете существующие здания! Т.к. пользуетесь устаревшими спутниковыми снимками Bing. Пожалуйста используйте снимки Esri.
Dimacn (2023-04-24 03:16:39+00:00): Пожалуйста используйте спутниковые снимки Esri, они намного новее чем устаревший Bing (который использовали вы).
Dimacn (2023-04-24 10:21:41+00:00): Вами добавлены здания которых уже не существует - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1164990486  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1164990485  Это из-за того, что вы используете устаревшие спутниковые снимки Bing.  Пожалуйста используйте спутниковые снимки Esri, они намного новее.
Allison P (2023-11-07 23:34:28+00:00): Planned features should be tagged with proposed=* or proposed:*
tordans (2023-09-19 14:05:20+00:00): @Stefan laut https://leute.tagesspiegel.de/tempelhof-schoeneberg/kiezkamera/2023/09/19/291884/ ist die Brücke eröffnet. Auf den neusten Luftbildern sieht man sie auch. Am Objekt sind aber so viele Tags… habe da gerade keine Überblick was man da haben wollen würde.
StefanHRT (2023-09-19 16:17:08+00:00): Das muss man sich mal direkt vor Ort anschauen, auch bzgl. der Beschilderung (footway und bicycle=yes oder path mit designated). Zum damaligen Zeitpunkt war nur die eingesetzte Brücke da, Zugänge durch Zaun und Baumaschinen versperrt. Vielleicht tauchen ja morgen auch Fotos auf zur/nach der Eröffnung
pitscheplatsch (2023-04-27 15:24:34+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135322602
pitscheplatsch (2023-04-27 15:23:46+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135322673
4004 (2023-04-30 22:31:35+00:00): здравствуйте, спасибо за правку.
а вы местный, или адреса откуда то берете?
mzioma (2023-05-08 20:07:19+00:00): Proszę nie dodawaj barierek (barrier	guard_rail) tam gdzie są krawężniki (kerb). W razie wątpliwości korzystaj z dokumentacji https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:barrier
Radomir2511 (2023-05-09 04:25:25+00:00): Dlaczego pousuwałeś te obiekty? Niszczysz tylko pracę innych.
mzioma (2023-05-09 07:07:58+00:00): Dziękuję za odpowiedź, tak jak już pisałem długo wcześniej proszę nie ustawiaj barierek tam gdzie ich nie ma.
Wcześniej poprawiałem to na krawężniki, ale niestety później zmieniałeś to z powrotem na barierki :(
Radomir2511 (2023-05-09 07:59:41+00:00): I postanowiłeś pousuwać linie żebym nie zrobił tego znowu ? Ja twoich prac nie niszczę.
Radomir2511 (2023-05-09 08:27:33+00:00): Liczę na to że dodasz linie tak jak były i otagujesz tym nieszczęsnym krawężnikiem
mzioma (2023-05-09 08:56:13+00:00): Niestety mój wcześniejszy komentarz i poprawienie nie przyniosły rezultatu - historia się znów powtórzyła. Teraz przynajmniej rozmawiamy i jest to lepsze rozwiązanie niż np. blokowanie konta.
Radomir2511 (2023-05-09 09:07:02+00:00): "historia się znów powtórzyła" ?? Jak mogła się powtórzyć skoro stało się to raz. Dalej uważam że niszczysz prace innych i do tego nie masz zamiaru tego naprawić.
mzioma (2023-05-09 09:17:23+00:00): Tutaj poprawialiśmy po sobie https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/701127433/history
A tutaj prosiłem o prawidłowe tagowanie: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/130047919
Radomir2511 (2023-05-09 09:20:40+00:00): Raz zmieniłeś na krawężnik a ja później na barierę chyba że źle tą historię odczytałem
mzioma (2023-05-09 09:24:20+00:00): Tak, dokładnie o to chodzi.
Radomir2511 (2023-05-09 09:53:37+00:00): Więc teraz dodaj linię które usunąłeś i otaguj jako krawężniki.
mzioma (2023-05-09 09:58:24+00:00): Raz już poprawiałem, od tego zacząłem.
Radomir2511 (2023-05-09 10:00:42+00:00): Usunąłeś moją pracę na którą poświęciłem swój czas więc chcę żebyś to naprawił.
mzioma (2023-05-09 10:03:50+00:00): Ja poświęcałem swój czas na poprawę na krawężniki.
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-07 10:17:19+00:00): Thank you for mapping. Please provide changeset comment for mass modification or the changes you have made. Happy Mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135284774
PcMouse1 (2023-04-24 05:50:24+00:00): Hi mahashim, I see you have requested a review of this changeset.
It looks good and everything looks nicely mapped.
Finally, thank you for contributing to the map, hope you stay a while!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135285028
eggie (2023-04-24 06:03:21+00:00): Oke...
Alle begin is moeilijk Jelmer.. 
Dit zijn je edits
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=135285039

Die editor iD vraag om van alles en nog wat in te vullen.

Het pad zal niet routeren, want..

smoothness=impassable  !

Daar kun je wellicht beter =bad van maken als het lastig lopen is.
foot=yes mag weg..  Het is een wandelpad.
incline=0% kan weg. Er zijn hier nergens heuvels...  De Donk niet meegerekend.

name=Boerenwandelpad  kan weg. Het zal niet de naam van het pad zijn. 
embankment=yes  Het zal op sommige kaarten als een dijk renderen.
Een echte fout is Je 'footway' ligt geplakt op de bestaande track en serviceroad. 
Die is ingetekend als highway=track  (Dus breed genoeg voor trekkers e.d.) 
Wanneer je gewoon over dat bestaande 'track' loopt blijft het een track. Die staat op access=private en zal dus niet routeren. 
Dus het eerste bestaand stuk zal nog gewoon een track zijn. (Voor landbouwvoertuigen. Waar dat ophoudt zal het verder gaan als highway=footway

Dus Jelmer.. Nog werk aan de winkel daar in Goudriaan.
Heb overigens jullie website net bekeken.  Ziet er gezellig uit.
-----
Dus nu..  weg splitsen vanaf het nieuwe gedeelte. Het oude gedeelte routeerbaarmaken door foot=permissive  Dat overruled die access=private
eggie (2023-04-24 09:32:20+00:00): De duplicated (opgeplakte)  way  heb ik verwijderd tot aan de afbuiging van de landbouwweg.
De rest getagd als highway=path

Het zal nu routeren voor wandelaars. 
Of de surfacetags helemaal kloppen geen idee.
surface=concrete wordt getagd als tracktype=grade1
Het eerste begin heb ik als gravel getagd. 

Het noordelijke stuk wellicht ook access=private met foot=permissive
(algemeen access=permissive heb ik verwijderd) Dat klopt niet met de foot=permissive
In het begin is OSM echt rijstebrij.. Ik weet het. 
MVG
eggie
Het Groene Wout (2023-04-24 10:32:51+00:00): Dank voor de hulp. Groet Jelmer
rhtb0 (2023-04-24 07:55:12+00:00): Myuhi, kkh5201, 그리고 Hyumi
이 3개의 계정들은 모두 같은 사람이죠? 편집 범위가 울산을 벗어나지 않고 바뀜집합 댓글들이 모두 숫자를 적는 형식이 같은데 이러한 다중 계정을 만드시는 이유가 무엇인가요?
Myuhi (2023-04-24 09:28:43+00:00): 다른 계정에 이유를 말씀드리겠습니다
ChehrehBargi (2023-04-27 12:41:50+00:00): Excellent, thank you
hatul (2023-05-30 07:09:57+00:00): תודה על ההוספה למפה. אין צורך לכתוב בשם תצפית כי זה סוג הנקודה ממילא.
ivanbranco (2023-04-24 10:47:52+00:00): Hi bagnolais,

how did you verify this artwork location?
bagnolais (2023-04-24 11:28:30+00:00): photo aérienne + https://marguerite-de-flandre-gondecourt.enthdf.fr/etablissement/
ivanbranco (2023-04-24 11:59:19+00:00): I see you fixed it after my comment. I agree that now is the correct location (the shadow is visible in that aerial imagery). 

Good mapping