piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
maraf24 (2024-03-24 17:36:31+00:00): >Dużym dzielnicom odpowiada place=borough, a osiedlom z uchwał place=suburb.

Wymyśliłeś to. Nie istnieją takie ustalenia.
Cała reszta to albo błędne odwoływanie się do rendera (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer) albo jakieś własne pomysły bazujące na analizie słów. Również błędne.
maro21 (2024-03-30 00:10:02+00:00): > liczby ludności, występowania w nazwie oficjalnego osiedla (np. Zacisze-Zalesie-Szczytniki - najbardziej znane i największe jest Zacisze)

Czy mógłbyś gdzieś spisać algorytm, według którego postępujesz? Tak żeby łatwo go można było odtworzyć za kilkanaście lat. Od jakiej liczby ludności co się zaczyna.
Jak spiszesz, to łatwiej się będzie można odnieść i prowadzić dyskusję. Bo patrząc na historię zmian węzła danego osiedla, co jakiś czas było zmieniane osiedle: suburb-neighbourhood-suburb-neighbourhood i tak w kółko, nie jesteś pierwszy, który to zmienia.
infeeeee (2024-03-05 19:20:40+00:00): Szia!

Továbbra is kérlek használj specifikusabb changeset kommenteket. 

Kérlek válaszolj az én hozzászólásaimra a változácsomagjaidon, ez már a harmadik.

A footway=sidewalk az azt jelenti hogy járda, azaz olyan gyalogút, ami egy autóút mellett fut párhuzamosan, a házak közötti gyalogútra nem kell rárakni, ott elég a highway=footway. Ez vonatkozik a következő szerkesztésedben rajzolt gyalogutakra is. 

Egy parkolót illetve egy házat is kitöröltél majd újrarajzoltál. Lehetőleg az ilyen törlés/újrarajzolásokat kerülni kell,  inkább a meglévő elemet módosítsd! Törléskor elveszik az elem története,  és az hasznos információkat is tartalmazhat: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history

Ráadásul a parkolónál nem is raktál vissza minden adatot, szóval a "Hibajavítás" címét rontottál is a térképen.

Kérlek válaszolj, írtam üzenetet is. 

Ha kérdésed merülne fel, a magyar szerkesztő közösség elérhetőségeit megtalálod ezen az oldalon: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hungary/Közösség
Németh Attila (2025-06-24 15:31:51+00:00): Szia!

A járdáknál kijavítottam a problémás részeket.

A parkolónál nem látom mi hiányozna még. A verzió történetekben sem látom hogy több szerepelne.

A törlésért elnézést többet nem csinálok ilyet.
infeeeee (2025-06-24 19:35:15+00:00): Ez volt a régi parkoló, törlés előtti állapotában: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/287430823/history/3

Ez meg az új: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1257838566

Láthatod így a különbséget. Amúgy vannak erre eszközök, amikkel könnyebben lehet módosításcsomagokat ellenőrizni, az alap felületen ezt nehéz lenne, amit én használok osmcha, amihez be kell jelentkezni: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148252508

Vagy az achavi, ehhez nem kell login: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=148252508&relations=true

A source címkét már nem így használjuk, törölhető, egy régi maradvány, hogy minden elemen rajta van a source=bing bővebben erről itt: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source

De a többi címke tartalmazott információkat, ami így elveszett.
Németh Attila (2025-06-26 08:20:03+00:00): Javítottam amit tudtam a parkolónál.

És köszönöm a két ellenőrző eszközt.
user_18023081 (2024-05-12 15:11:04+00:00): Good luck riding a horse in such a narrow path anyway (especially at the Rue d'Anderlues entrance)
bxl-forever_repair (2024-05-12 17:07:01+00:00): What is the point of this passive-aggressive comment, please?

The way had the following tags: access=no + bicycle=yes + foot=yes + highway=path.

This is an awkward pile of access tags, and it was subsequently changed to remove access=no, which has adverse effects, among others, on rendering.

The changeset did not change access conditions for pedestrians, cyclists or horse riders.  In version 2, horses were disallowed (because of access=no); in version 3, they are still disallowed (because of horse=no), so why would this be a problem?

In case you are not familiar with how access rules are cascaded, this page might be an interesting one to read.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Belgium

Have a nice day.
user_18023081 (2025-02-05 20:10:12+00:00): ok 🥱
nevw (2024-03-06 04:08:14+00:00): I was unable to find the game machines in the casino entrance drive through. Please relocate on a separate node in the true location with the floor level included in the address.
Ewen Hill (2024-03-06 04:21:04+00:00): Can't the node be deleted - this appears to be just SEO
nevw (2024-03-06 07:16:56+00:00): Hi Daniel-Harris (Royal Reels)
I have reverted your edits now. 
These have been reverted due to incorrect placement and damage to previous mapped features. 
If you wish to remap the business details, you will need to add a new node placed at the location/s where the business operates using proper address details. 
The casino is already mapped and as already suggested, their website provides details of their facilities.
nevw (2024-03-06 07:24:40+00:00): This is how the Crown Melbourne casino is mapped now
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/13306836/#map=18/-37.82333/144.95870
Mateen_afk (2024-03-06 00:59:51+00:00): Can anyone review this?
CjMalone (2024-03-05 19:45:33+00:00): Two of the buildings were overlapping, otherwise looks good, thank you. (I've moved it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148265546#map=19/53.30924/-4.09956)
Frans S (2024-03-05 16:25:27+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Often oversized mapped.
Included shadow of a building.
clustered buildings.
Non squared buildings.


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148253871
Frans S (2024-03-12 17:50:52+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Inaccurate mapped.
Oversized,
Not squared.
Mappings from this and other change sets will be removed and need to be mapped all over again.


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148254582
Hungerburg (2025-12-22 12:34:43+00:00): Hallo Worker, laut https://www.kematenintirol.at/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Gemeindezeitung-98.pdf geht hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/35373148 seit dem Frühjahr ein neuer Radweg durch.

Du hast dort ein Radfahrverbot erfasst. Ist das also aufgehoben? Der Schranken am unteren Ende war gestern geöffnet, das war vor zwei Jahren noch nicht so.
Frans S (2024-03-06 17:23:06+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Not accurate mapped. Way oversized.
Follow the rooflines of a building.
Buildings not always squared.
Nodes connected to other features


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148254661
Frans S (2024-03-09 11:57:03+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Inaccurate mapped.

Buildings not squared

Nodes connected to other features

follow the roofline of a building rather than the tree line, where the building is hidden (partly) by a tree


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148254833
Frans S (2024-03-15 17:40:03+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Often oversized mapped.
Buildings not squared


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148254967
Frans S (2024-03-09 09:23:53+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Inaccurate mapped. (poorly shaped buildings)
Buildings not squared.


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148255067
martinst (2024-03-06 07:47:52+00:00): Wäre building=boathouse nicht passender?
axelschulz (2024-03-06 08:34:19+00:00): doch, da hast Du absolut Recht. Die APP Streetcomplet hat mir nur das angeboten, ... war mir nicht bewusst, dass es noch Boathouse gibt.
martinst (2024-03-06 13:01:10+00:00): Gibts auch bei Streecomplete unter Other -> Boathouse
Habs verbessert in Changeset 148293947.
axelschulz (2024-03-06 15:48:13+00:00): Danke
santamariense (2024-03-28 16:44:59+00:00): Olá ASM 97,

Como não houve resposta a mensagem privada enviada há 8 dias, reposto aqui para apreciação da comunidade, referente as changesets de números 148255320, 148253187, 148232817.

Tudo bem? Preciso tirar umas dúvidas contigo. Percebi que você modificou a tag ref de importantes rodovias entre São Paulo e Curitiba. Você citou como sendo conhecimento pessoal, porém não achei fontes oficiais ainda que corroborem com as afirmações abaixo as quais se baseiam em suas edições na área:

    Trecho da BR-116 coincide com BR-101. Das fonte oficias, o que dá a entender é que existe uma descontinuidade mesmo.

    Trecho da BR-116 não coincide com a BR-478. Isso consta antes e foi retirado. Não tenho certeza se se aplica.

Fontes de dados que consultei

SP: https://www.gov.br/dnit/pt-br/assuntos/planejamento-e-pesquisa/dnit-geo/mapas-multimodais/mapas-2023/sp.pdf/

PR: https://www.gov.br/dnit/pt-br/assuntos/planejamento-e-pesquisa/dnit-geo/mapas-multimodais/mapas-2023/pr.pdf/

https://servicos.dnit.gov.br/vgeo/

Também visualizei imagens Mapillary ao longo de alguns trechos e não pude detectar placas no local.

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?z=10&lat=-25.0480&lng=-48.5658

Desde já, agradeço o esclarecimento.

[]’s

santamariense
Frans S (2024-03-09 11:30:05+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)

Inaccurate/oversized mapped 

Buildings not squared

Nodes connected to other features

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148255570
Frans S (2024-03-08 14:22:20+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Inaccurate mapped.
Clustered buildings
Buildings not squared.


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148255582
Frans S (2024-03-08 14:39:23+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Inaccurate mapped.
Buildings not squared.
Followed tree lines rather than rooflines

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148255587
JNAsendiaUSA (2024-03-08 14:58:07+00:00): i don't understand what i did wrong. I am hitting the Q bottom on my keyboard to make everything square (i can't help it if that doesn't make it perfect) and i am marking what looks like roof tops to me. I am doing my best when it comes to trees and keeping it symmetrical as possible. Please show me exactly what i did wrong so i can fix for next time.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148255587
Frans S (2024-03-09 09:13:10+00:00): I commented direct to you . Not enough room here.
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148255587
Frans S (2024-03-11 17:43:43+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Inaccurate mapped.
Far oversized sometimes.
Buildings not squared.
Check this page about the adjustments we had to make

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=148517020



Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148255678
VLD549 (2024-03-24 08:43:59+00:00): Hi, Omgelegde Eelderdiep I can find, not the one you suggest. Could you indicate the source that was used with a link? Thank you!
Henksbg61 (2024-03-24 16:23:21+00:00): Hi,
I hope this will be helpful:
https://geo.noorderzijlvest.nl/Geoweb/index.html?viewer=Waterschapskaart.Waterschapskaart
Regards
VLD549 (2024-03-25 14:44:42+00:00): Thanks a lot for your effort, however, the site doesn't seem to work/open.
'This site can't be reached'. 
I tried only https://geo.noorderzijlvest.nl/, doesn't work either. 
Any other ideas? :)
Thanks!
Henksbg61 (2024-03-25 21:10:20+00:00): Maybe you can try this:
https://www.noorderzijlvest.nl/

In the "zoeken" field type: waterschapskaart

Choose: waterstanden en peilen

Click the blue field: GeoWeb 5.6

Then a map should open on which you can see rivers, streams and ditches.

Whis you succes!
VLD549 (2024-04-04 09:06:56+00:00): Thank you for the info!
Henksbg61 (2024-04-04 09:48:57+00:00): Welkom!
Frans S (2024-03-05 16:46:34+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148255820
Frans S (2024-03-15 17:19:57+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info) These comments are valid for other changesets on this task.

Oversized many buildings.

Not squared buildings


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148255960
Tim Grose (2024-03-06 12:36:16+00:00): Hi
I don't think the service road to White Lane Farm should be given an actual name in keeping with https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name and "The value is not a name, but rather an address". Also it appears to be a private access road to just the farm and I can see what looks like a closed gate into the car parking and main part of the farm. As such I am inclined to think we should:
Delete the road name
Make the service road private
Add a gate as above
Frans S (2024-03-08 13:43:32+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Inaccurate mapped.
Oversized mapped.
Buildings not squared


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148256023
Frans S (2024-03-05 16:53:14+00:00): Hello. See my comment on your other changeset. The same issues here.
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148256064
Frans S (2024-03-11 18:07:39+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. However, often not squared !

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148256085
NorthCrab_upload (2024-03-05 15:40:27+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5026518100

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Frans S (2024-03-11 18:01:29+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Inaccurate mapped.
Buildings not squared
Clustered buildings


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148256114
Frans S (2024-03-06 17:25:50+00:00): In addition to my previous account:
do not cluster buildings.
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148256254