piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-08-27 23:31:21+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 155765774, 155824054.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-08-27 23:49:55+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155779458 is the original changeset that got duplicated.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-08-27 23:51:10+00:00): Correction 155778419 got duplicated by 155779458
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-08-27 23:51:51+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155778419
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-08-27 23:53:43+00:00): The features deleted in this changeset were duplicates of features added in 155778419
Marek-M (2024-08-28 12:01:01+00:00): Czy te drogi mają po dwa pasy ruchu?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1311638002
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1311638003
stasiu512 (2024-08-28 13:03:07+00:00): to również wieczorem poprawie. dziekuję!
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-31 14:54:38+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12141004982/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop?
Anthony_____S (2024-08-28 08:50:42+00:00): These specific streets (Harrier and Beaconsfield) are still under active construction; aerial imagery is unlikely to be up to date.
I am happy to review when construction is complete, but in the meantime it is provisional, changeable and  aerial imagery is not definitive.
MacLondon (2024-08-28 20:39:36+00:00): I passed around there yesterday. Apart from the mid-section of Beaconsfield, almost all of the roads are constructed, and where relevant include oneway arrow markings and contraflow cycle logos.

They remain mostly unopened but they are well beyond being changeable. Alignments can always be adjusted later on using GPS or aerial imagery.
Anthony_____S (2024-08-29 06:29:27+00:00): The North end of Harrier is also unopened. But being there is great. 

I always add "source: survey" to such changes, as it seems this is the metadata that means "I was there and saw it firsthand."
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source#General_sources_commonly_used_by_human_mappers
literan (2024-08-28 17:13:07+00:00): тег foot=designated на пешеходных дорожках лишний. footway это уже означает foot=designated
literan (2024-08-28 17:14:35+00:00): footway:surface=paving_stones на пешедорожках тоже лишний. Это тег для разделенных пеше-велодорожек (где серфейс у каждой из частей может быть разный).

Почищу лишние теги
mikhalind (2024-08-28 17:53:25+00:00): Теги footway:surface вроде не трогал,
в пакете правок преимущественно изменения геометрии по GPS + подтянул велодорожки к их актуальному местонахождению
Насчет тега foot учту впредь, что это избыточно
literan (2024-08-28 18:08:17+00:00): вот здесь в 28 версии добавили, например https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/39258670/history

но неважно, я уже поправил. Спасибо вам за правки!
mtmail (2024-09-01 12:02:39+00:00): The gym building was drawn on top of another building. The state, city, street name don't match the area. The house number (666) looks made up. The area is a restricted military area. What is the basis or source for the data?
Allison P (2024-09-02 01:48:12+00:00): It's obviously fake. I sent a DWG report.
mtmail (2024-09-03 11:28:39+00:00): Yes, looks like it. I removed it now.
pitscheplatsch (2024-08-29 19:42:55+00:00): Just a test?
pitscheplatsch (2024-10-23 17:19:46+00:00): Due to no response, reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158263937
pitscheplatsch (2024-08-29 19:42:36+00:00): Just a test?
pitscheplatsch (2024-10-23 17:19:24+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155870099
nevw (2024-08-28 02:10:26+00:00): Also left the Hinze Dam Numinbah Nature Refuge overlapping wooded areas for now.
nevw (2024-08-28 06:06:24+00:00): I think the mapping of the large wooded area with multiple inners forming their own inner ring within the mp and more inners within that ring triggering the osmi warning is a bit unfortunate but not an unreasonable  way to map. I can’t think of a better way the complexity and feel the osmi error needs to be considered a false positive in this case.
nevw (2024-08-28 06:10:53+00:00): …not a false positive but more an acceptable and tolerable mapping error.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-02 09:37:40+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12141128746/history has fixme:type = カフェ that was added in this edit
Have you tried to map a cafe here? Then amenity=cafe would likely fit, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcafe
Fizzie-DWG (2024-08-28 03:39:24+00:00): We really need changeset comments to describe what's been done, rather than other people having to try to work it out, so please try to use full comments - your others have been fine!
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-11-11 07:26:39+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/10507195/history - is there any trace of that railway on the ground?

is "Former Stockton Mills Rail" its actual name or a description?

having both name:absent=yes and name= is a bit confusing
user_9347240 (2024-11-14 01:11:01+00:00): Hi Mateusz, while the Stockton Mills Rail has been torn up decades ago, there are traces of that rail way that would have been there including railroad ties and smaller parts of the rail that have been cut up. Check out this image for an overall view: http://www.sbdepotmuseum.com/1850-1879/august-4-1852-sacramento-valley-railroad.html. I don't have a publicly accessible image of the original track. Since there is no official name to the rail system that had connected the Folsom Dam and prison to old Town Folsom, I used the landmark "Stockton Mills" which is where the railway pointed to in old Folsom. We can leave off the name if it is required it be official and set the tag as "name:absent=yes".
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-11-25 04:03:01+00:00): It is definitely not required to be official.

If name is in use then it goes into name - but object having name without official name is not qualifying for name:absent=yes
bradrh (2025-05-25 15:15:56+00:00): royal gorge park is still royal gorge park.   the ranch and resort is a subdivision nearby
pitscheplatsch (2024-08-29 19:42:20+00:00): Just a test?
klfb75gxiy21tjrh (2024-08-31 02:44:22+00:00): 你在干什么？你被我发现了，如果只是测试的话，请删掉你创建的那个地点，谢谢
klfb75gxiy21tjrh (2024-08-31 02:53:36+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155997239
klfb75gxiy21tjrh (2024-08-31 02:54:32+00:00): OpenStreetMap 欢迎你，我们可以包容你最开始犯的小错误，希望你可以对地图做出更多的贡献！😊
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-04 10:20:33+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12141303764/history has shop = propangus that was added in this edit
shop=propangus ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop or https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Tag_descriptions_for_key_%22shop%22 fitting? Maybe new value needs to be invented? Maybe this data is wrong and there is no shop here? Maybe it is not a shop but something else?
pitscheplatsch (2024-08-29 19:31:55+00:00): Should probably be reviewed by the local community due to previous reverts of this local location name.
pitscheplatsch (2024-10-23 17:20:20+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156694703
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-09-04 04:25:22+00:00): Why were 2 roads mapped at Banton Boulevard?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/155860170
lawrence_ruiz (2024-09-11 04:34:37+00:00): Banton Boulevard is a new road built parallel to the section of the Banton Circumferential Road that runs from Ildefonso Musico Street to Hambian Road in Sitio Catarman. It also serves as shore protection for barangay Poblacion and Hambi-an.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-09-11 06:03:14+00:00): But you mapped multiple roads. There should only be one.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-09-11 06:04:19+00:00): If there's multiple please provide a source like mapillary
habi (2024-08-28 06:00:53+00:00): Und ein paar Bäume und ein Hüttli erfasst
MaxT63 (2024-08-28 06:13:51+00:00): Still need to collect a new GPX track for the middle section of the Evac Trail since it's been changed a lot in the last few years
Jan Olieslagers (2024-08-29 10:23:29+00:00): Please do not bluntly removed aerodromes when closed - I was near to re-adding it. Better to tag as disused:aeroway or even historic:aeroway, so as to leave some memory
Sebastian Wallroth (2024-08-29 14:58:25+00:00): The airfield is literally away. It's part of the farmers field next to it now.
大山かなめ (2024-08-28 07:24:08+00:00): いつも埼玉県内で多くの地物を描いているのはとてもありがたいのですが、いくつかの疑問点がありますので指摘させていただきます。
・いつも川越市内の編集のコメントにKawaguchi cityと書いているようです
・タグのないウェイがしばしば見受けられます。この編集でも車道脇の歩道のタグ付けが適していると思われるいくつかのウェイが空です

コメントの誤記であれば読む側が補完すれば済みますが、空タグのウェイは別の編集者さんが直す必要が生じてしまいます。今一度編集結果を送信する前に目を通していただけると助かります。
Oreg2 (2024-09-11 12:00:52+00:00): Salut 1ucian0, super, dass Du Dich um fehlende Strassendetails kümmerst. In diesem Fall gibt es vielleicht ein Missverständnis. Auf der Niedelbadstrasse in Kilchberg hast Du "cycleway:both=shoulder" gesetzt. Das würde bedeuten, dass die Strasse einen Seitenstreifen oder Standstreifen aufweist, auf dem Velos fahren können. Tatsächlich gibt es hier keinen Seitenstreifen und auch keinen Velostreifen.

Könntest Du die Tags wieder entfernen? Das impliziert, dass keine Veloinfrastruktur vorhanden ist, was ja hier der Fall ist.

Danke und Grüsse!
Oreg2 (2024-09-11 19:05:59+00:00): Ah, I just noticed that you're using the StreetComplete app, so you might never see these messages. Hope you won't hold it against me if I make the change myself.
1ucian0 (2024-09-11 21:07:35+00:00): please go ahead and sorry for the mistake. What's the right property when cycling is possible and allow, but no special marks.
Oreg2 (2024-09-12 09:30:46+00:00): Thank you for your response. I'm glad you found the messages. :-)

Without any cycling infrastructure there is no need for tagging. No tagging implies cycling is allowed but no infrastructure.

It's also OK to use cycleway=no but it's not necessary. I would say such a tag might help on larger roads where one would hope for infrastructure but it's missing. On a small street like this, however, infrastructure would be very unusual.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle
chris66 (2025-08-30 18:18:50+00:00): hast vergessen das amenity=telephone zu löschen.. :)
Black_Diamond (2024-08-28 07:00:59+00:00): The location of this business was derived from https://gis.santacruzcounty.us/gisweb/ and note 4049351
silversurfer83 (2024-08-28 13:00:00+00:00): Moin Chris,

ohne Quellenangabe und nur mit "fix errors" sieht diese Änderung auf den ersten Blick verdächtig aus. Erst nach näherer Beschäftigung gehe ich davon aus, dass die Änderung in Ordnung ist.

Ich fände es schön, wenn du uns in Zukunft besser erklären würdest, was du warum änderst. Das hilft allen, die hier an der Karte tätig sind. Danke

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/155864881
infeeeee (2024-08-29 20:42:04+00:00): Szia! Üdv az OpenStreetMapen!

Ilyenkor nem a legjobb az utak törlése, főleg ha még látszanak műholdképeken. Valaki vissza fogja rajzolni véletlenül.

Különböző korlátozásokkal kell jelölni, hogy hiába ott az út nem szabad arra menni: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access

Visszaállítottam azokat az utakat, amik látszanak a friss Esri-n, és raktam mindre egy access=private címkét. Ahol láttam, hogy hol van, oda raktam kerítéseket is, itt: https://www.osm.org/changeset/155946808

Javítsd ki kérlek, ha valamit félreértettem volna.

Ha kérdésed merülne fel, a magyar szerkesztő közösség elérhetőségeit megtalálod ezen az oldalon: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hungary/Közösség

További jó térképezést!
eggie (2024-08-28 08:39:12+00:00): Dag Jeff,

Even als voorbeeld ter Leering ende Vermaeck.
layer=-1 heb ik verwijderd.
Die toegangsweg loopt niet onder de grond.
De overkapping staat op layer=1
en het stuk onder de overkapping heeft de tag covered=yes.
Groet
eggie
eggie (2024-08-28 08:39:28+00:00): CTRL-F5 voor het effect
ItsOnlyJeff (2024-08-28 08:44:58+00:00): Ik zie het, dank voor de toelichting!

Groetjes,
Jeffrey
eggie (2024-08-28 09:03:19+00:00): Ik heb gelijk even de oversteek met het Trambaanpad een update gegeven en de fietsroute anders laten oversteken + twee bromfietsdoorsteken toegevoegd op de Sprong
Rainero (2024-09-06 11:33:44+00:00): Hallo jotgeem,

super, dass du beiträgst die Openstreetmap-Daten zu vervollständigen!
Da du noch nicht so viele Änderungen gemacht hast, ein kleiner Tipp für Gebäude: wenn du das Gebäude anklickst und dann die Taste q drückst, wird es rechtwinklig gemacht.
Zum Zeichnen von Gebäuden gibt es für den JOSM-Editor ein tolles Plugin: building_tools. Über Bearbeiten -> Einstellungen -> Erweiterungen kannst du es hinzufügen. Mehr Info darüber findest du hier: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:JOSM/Plugins/BuildingsTools

Weiter frohes Mappen wünscht
Rainer
EP_Repair (2024-10-16 02:35:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 157944578 where the changeset comment is: Reverting changesets due to incorrect railway speed limit edits by a now-deleted user. Without source verification and based on local reports of errors, we are restoring prior data. Ticket#2024101510000176
NorthCrab_upload (2024-08-28 08:20:51+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nieprawidłowa wartość addr:postcode.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12141624801

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2024-08-28 08:50:47+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nieprawidłowa wartość addr:postcode. Kod pocztowy powinien być formatu XX-XXX, gdzie X oznacza cyfrę.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12141664022

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12141664021
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/920125307

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Pan (2024-08-29 07:37:14+00:00): Well done! I had been preparing that for days! Thanks.
Thibaultmol (2024-08-28 08:51:18+00:00): sorry, checking in a second once it's loaded into osmcha why this changeset got so massive... not sure what happened. wil revert if needed
Thibaultmol (2024-08-28 09:08:42+00:00): reverted with 155869207
Richard (2024-08-28 12:19:16+00:00): Hi - in this changeset you have changed relation 8495916 from network=ncn to network=rcn. This is wrong. This is a regional route (numbers on a blue background) and as such is tagged with RCN, not a national route (numbers on a red background) tagged with NCN. NCN 51 runs from Oxford to Cambridge and into East Anglia, not in Devon.

Could you fix this change and any other similar ones you've made? Thank you.
Richard (2024-08-28 12:20:28+00:00): (Whoops - I do of course mean that you've changed it from network=rcn to network=ncn, and that it should have stayed as rcn!)
user_9916803 (2024-08-28 13:10:57+00:00): Hello, thanks but NCN 51 is also in this location. If you look on Ordance Survey maps, where Sustrans has it's public facing routes, you can see this. The changes I have made are to correct the National Cycle Network. 
https://explore.osmaps.com/route/21973748/lwr-streetview-mapping?lat=51.205022&lon=-3.698851&zoom=11.1329&style=Standard&type=2d&overlays=os-ncn-layer
Richard (2024-08-28 13:32:42+00:00): No it isn't. Whatever is shown on OS Maps, which has numerous visualisation flaws, is beside the point.

We map what's on the ground, and what's on the ground is blue signs for a regional cycle route. Therefore it is tagged as network=rcn. Please revert this back to the correct state before I have to take this to the Data Working Group.
user_9916803 (2024-08-28 13:55:35+00:00): sorry i had no intention to cause a problem. please can you let me know how to revert the changes.
Richard (2024-08-28 14:10:14+00:00): You can revert a changeset using https://revert.monicz.dev . You will need to know the ID of the changeset you want to revert - you can see all your changesets at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/NCN%20updates/history
user_9916803 (2024-08-28 14:19:52+00:00): Thanks. I have done that for the RCN51 changes i made. sorry again.
kitsee (2024-08-29 22:42:54+00:00): Hi there, I would you like to say that you could avoid OS Maps when contributing to OSM. With exception of OS OpenData and out of copyright maps, OS Maps are copyrighted and are not compatible with OSM's licence. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ordnance_Survey
user_9916803 (2024-08-30 06:36:39+00:00): i wasn't aware of that. i will revert.
Gazer75 (2024-08-28 14:56:30+00:00): This is a duplicate of the already existing ferry line. The ferry go via Frønningen if needed.
Dauerläufer (2024-08-28 15:20:27+00:00): Fjord1 does not stop in Frønningen (https://www.fjord1.no/eng/Routes-and-timetables/Vestland/Kaupanger-Gudvangen?from=NSR%3AQuay%3A99291&to=NSR%3AQuay%3A99772&date=28.08.2024)
Gazer75 (2024-08-28 15:41:30+00:00): It is the same service. Fjord1 operates this in summer months. AFAIK the ferry still calls at Frønningen on request. Same with Styvi. It seems as though there is a separate ferry Kaupanger-Frønningen these days. Maybe more appropriate to update the existing route as there are not two separate routes here.
Gazer75 (2024-08-28 16:16:00+00:00): I just called the ferry operating the route to clarify. The Gudvangen-Kaupanger ferry no longer go via Frønningen or Styvi. It also only operates 1. May - 1. September. From 2024 there is a separate ferry Kaupanger-Frønningen. Styvi is served via the electric passenger ferry between Gudvangen and Flåm.
Dauerläufer (2024-08-29 15:16:31+00:00): Gazer75 - thanks for clarification!
Vinber-Pro (2025-12-21 14:53:20+00:00): Bonjour,
attention ici vous avez fait un doublon (l'attribut crèche à la fois sur le batiment et comme un noeud au milieu du batiment) et effacé le fait qu'il y a un batiment.

je corrige et je mets le lien ici ensuite pour aider à comprendre
bonne carto
Vinber-Pro (2025-12-21 14:56:28+00:00): fait ici https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176221418
eggie (2024-08-28 09:20:54+00:00): Dag MpM  
Dat is zeker een fietspad nu. 
Ik heb maxspeed 30 hier verwijderd. Ook oneway=yes op de aansluiting van het fietspad aangepast naar oneway=no

Gelijk maar de aansluiting op de Koraalstraat routeerbaar gemaakt.` en oneway=yes verwijderd. Het routeert straks weer hier.
MVG
eggie
mcliquid (2024-08-28 12:13:56+00:00): Just out of curiosity: Does the naming changed? (Only for Belgium?)
Thibaultmol (2024-08-28 12:37:28+00:00): For a lot of countries it has changed from Sodexo to Pluxee but I don't know which countries have or haven't changed yet
flother (2024-09-02 13:05:28+00:00): Why did you add an airport that doesn't exist?
vladislav471yakovlev (2024-09-20 13:36:32+00:00): Hi Pludoxi, I would like to know why the road was removed? (neighboring road: https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/809300902).
https://osmcha.org/changesets/155869394
Have a nice day!

Bonjour Pludoxi. Je voudrais savoir pourquoi la route a été supprimée? (route voisine : https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/809300902).
https://osmcha.org/changesets/155869394
Passe une bonne journée!
kitsee (2024-08-29 22:30:21+00:00): Hi there,
What is your source for this change?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/155869680
kmpoppe (2025-02-16 10:10:01+00:00): Hi rouelibre1,

I have redacted your version of the Come A Roma restaurant.

You added an email address to the ref:vatin field (replacing the correct VAT identification number).

As it was clearly a personal (name) email address, I suspect that you accidentally added this personal information that wasn't supposed to be public.

If course your other change (diet:vegan) is still there in the new version I created.

Regards

Kai    
OSMF DataWorkingGroup (DWG)
martianfreeloader (2024-09-05 22:54:41+00:00): Hi,
Can you help with these notes? They seem to lie on a path that you've recently checked.

https://www.osm.org/note/4348282
https://www.osm.org/note/4348287
mk2k22 (2024-09-06 05:53:48+00:00): Hi, I’ve seen these notes and was already going to just remove the two paths in question but decided to leave them as they are for now, as I can’t tell for sure whether they exist (albeit perhaps not well visible at all) or not. I only know of the path I marked as a hiking relation – which is above these two stray paths with notes and leads to Jezerska Kočna.
martianfreeloader (2024-09-06 07:30:13+00:00): The author sound rather certain it doesn't exist. They report that the path would lead directly towards a rock face. 

https://www.osm.org/way/1311723952
https://www.osm.org/note/4348287

Also, on aerial imagery, I can't make out any traces through the scree.

Should we just remove it?
mk2k22 (2024-09-06 09:34:30+00:00): Ok, I guess you can remove it....
martianfreeloader (2024-09-06 09:42:24+00:00): Ok, done.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-07 12:14:33+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12141715678 - to jest adres całego ogrodu działkowego?

Jak tak, to czemu nie jest to dodane na obszarze ogrodu działkowego?
NorthCrab_upload (2024-08-28 09:40:58+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12141753220
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12141753219
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12141753218
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1265007977
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1265007978
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1265007979

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
sk1me (2024-08-28 10:34:32+00:00): Dzięki, poprawiłem usuwając punktowe duplikaty adresów.
NorthCrab (2024-09-15 13:00:53+00:00): Wielkie dzięki!
mueschel (2024-09-01 08:48:54+00:00): Hi,
you added the new tag "TDX:date" here. If this is the date of your dataset, shouldn't this be in "source:date" instead of your day of edit?
eggie (2024-08-28 09:54:02+00:00): Dag Tom. Kun je met osmand ook drect op de adresnode bijtaggen... anders krijg je steeds twee identieke adressen?

Mvg
eggie
Tom van Dijk (2024-08-29 07:12:49+00:00): Ik ben bang van niet, je kan in het menu alleen "Add POI" aandrukken bij een bepaalde locatie en dan maakt ie een hele nieuwe node aan volgens mij. Excuses voor het ongemak, maar dit is voor mij zo het gemakkelijkst omdat ik zelf op de fiets navigeer met osmand (gpx en normale navigatie) en dan direct als ik ergens langs kom een POI kan toevoegen. Veel andere functionaliteit heeft het programma niet qua osm-edits maar ik dacht dat het wel nuttig was om ze in ieder geval zo toe te voegen.

mvg
Tom
eggie (2024-08-29 07:17:56+00:00): Ahhh.. dan weet ik dat ook weer.
Tja.. elke toevoeging is er natuurlijk één..
Jammer van die beperking.

Mapse.. ook onderweg..
eggie
Tom van Dijk (2024-08-29 07:31:06+00:00): Oh, ik zie hier op de wiki wat de features allemaal zijn per android-app: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Comparison_of_Android_applications#OpenStreetMap_editing_features en ja, daar blijkt die beperking inderdaad uit.
gscholz (2024-09-12 08:09:11+00:00): Hi CQD35,
your recent edits have left behind several errors regarding overlapping ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-2.35807&lat=48.51219&zoom=10&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=155870960

As you may know, this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps. Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido