piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2026-03-13 06:33:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13644563880 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Air quality facility"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-21 17:33:08+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180218631
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
aixbrick (2026-03-13 15:35:50+00:00): Hallo,
Worauf beruht diese Änderung? highway=cycleway wird nur gesetzt, wenn es sich um einen ausschließlichen und entsprechend beschilderten Radweg (VZ 237) handelt. Das ist eher selten.
Gruß
Kartenfreund-AC (2026-03-14 20:37:10+00:00): Hallo aixbrick,
ich nutze Komoot für meine Radtourplanung. Dort gab mir die automatische Routenplanung vor, die Straße zu nutzen, die dort besonders gefährlich ist. Ich konnte die Route allerdings durch Ziehen an dem Vorschlag auf den Radweg zwingen. In OpenStreetMap war dieser Radweg als Landwirtschaftlicher Weg definiert. Deine Nachricht lässt mich befürchten, dass meine Änderung nicht ganz richtig ist, und ich muss gestehen, dass ich bei der Wahl der richtigen Syntax unsicher bin. Sollte ich es nicht ganz richtig gemacht haben, möchte ich dich gerne bitten es zu korrigieren. Tatsächlich wird der Weg von seinem Nord-Westlichen Anfang bis zu der Feldgrenze zwischen "Ober der Bruchstraße" und "Lötewickchen" auch von Landwirten genutzt. Aber in erster Linie ist der Weg ein Radweg. Viele Grüße und Dank, Udo
aixbrick (2026-03-15 09:16:51+00:00): Danke für deine Rückmeldung. Ich habe das Tagging angepasst und auch surface ergänzt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179888077.
Die Wege sind fast durchgängig mit VZ250/VZ260 und "Landwirtschaftlicher Verkehr frei" beschildert. Das ist ein starkes Indiz für highway=track. Eine Ausnahme ist https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1489070823, wo die Beschilderung unterschiedlich je Richtung ist. Ich habe mich fürs Mapping für die eindeutigere, VZ240, entschieden.
Warum Komoot hier nicht entlangroutet, kann ich dir leider nicht beantworten. Möglicherweise hängt das am verwendeten Profil oder weil bisher die Oberfläche der Wege nicht genau definiert war. Grundsätzlich war highway=track aber korrekt.
Kartenfreund-AC (2026-03-17 06:48:56+00:00): Hallo Aixbrick, du scheinst dich ja bestens mit den Einstellungen auszukennen! Bevor ich die Qualität der Daten beschädige, würde ich Fehler die mir auffallen lieber an einen Experten wie dich melden, damit die Einstellungen optimal gemacht werden. Gibt es eine solche Stelle (Adresse) wo ich entsprechende Nachrichten hin schicken kann? Für alle Fälle hier noch meine E-Mail-Adresse:   udo.gehrer@t-online.de
Viele Grüße!
Udo
aixbrick (2026-03-17 08:55:58+00:00): Nein, eine solche zentrale Stelle gibt es nicht. OSM ist ein Gemeinschaftsprojekt, an dem jeder mitarbeiten kann. Regeln (oder eher Empfehlungen) werden von der Community beschlossen.
Für das korrekte Taggen von Straßen und Wegen empfehle ich https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Attribuierung_von_Stra%C3%9Fen_in_Deutschland und https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen_kartieren. Da finden sich genügend Beispiele.
Unter https://trafficsigns.osm-verkehrswende.org/ kann man anhand der Verkehrszeichen die (meist) richtigen Tags ermitteln.
Falls du dir unsicher bist, kannst du auch einfach einen Kartenhinweis setzen oder im deutschen Forum fragen: https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/de/56.
Bei weiteren Fragen kannst du mich auch per privater Nachricht kontaktieren.
eggie (2026-03-13 08:00:04+00:00): Hoi.. Er wordt gewoon conform de bebording getagd. Dus formeel zal dit stukje 80 zijn al zal niemand die snelheid rijden.
MVG
eggie
Achiel007 (2026-03-13 08:05:17+00:00): Waterstraat is een 60 zone, misschien heb ik het niet goed aangegeven.
eggie (2026-03-13 08:09:54+00:00): Dat zal ongerwijfeld, maar formeel geldt dat dan vanaf het bord max snelheid 60 en de markering op het wegdek. 
Wellicht heeft de voorgaande mapper daar rekening mee gehouden.
Je krijgt dan van die wonderlijke overgangen die formeel wel kloppen.
eggie (2026-03-13 14:49:51+00:00): Ik heb maxspeed 80 teruggezet voor dit stukje. bicycle=yes aangepast naar =no
De fietsknooppuntroute verlegd naar het fietspad.
De rest van de Waterstraat is natuurlijk wel maxspeed 60.

MVG
eggie
Achiel007 (2026-03-13 19:24:19+00:00): Bedankt, 

Was iets te onnauwkeurig. Moet nog veel leren.
eggie (2026-03-13 19:27:29+00:00): No problem.. Nu ligt gelijk de fietsroute goed.
Mapse,
eggie
NeisBot (2026-03-13 07:24:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/643421613 v7

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Wärmepumpen Großhandel"
---
Zum Beispiel könnte eine neutralere und sachlichere Version deines Textes lauten: "Wärmepumpen Großhandel"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisAgent (2026-03-13 16:05:47+00:00): 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again?
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-04 13:08:17+00:00): Cleaned up remaining SEO spam and incorrect tagging in changeset 185090076

https://osm.org/changeset/185090076
mueschel (2026-03-13 12:39:49+00:00): 

Please stop creating new accounts and importing your POIs one-by-one. Please read and obey the guidelines for imports and professional editing:

osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/6/62/Organised_Editing_Guidelines.pdf
NeisBot (2026-03-13 07:45:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13644638717 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Insurance agency"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-21 17:33:12+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180218636
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
Flynn Marquardt (2026-03-19 12:54:17+00:00): Hello,

why this new relation?

It seems a duplicate of https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9676651,
which already has a full border.

Please consider removing this duplicated relation.
FajrAl (2026-03-20 09:47:28+00:00): Reverted in changeset/180149790
SekeRob (2026-03-14 06:56:25+00:00): Now Broken, 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11555469
You break it, You fix it
gscholz (2026-03-14 06:30:43+00:00): Hi SimonPoole,
this changeset has left behind a damaged boundary relation for "Saint-Blaise":

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=6.99165&lat=47.02502&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1685530/history#map=14/47.02990/6.98866

Can you please fix this?

May be you could use a editor which shows warnings if you try to upload broken relations, like JOSM?

Kind regards
Guido
SimonPoole (2026-03-14 09:53:28+00:00): gain the boundary doesn't exist anymore and has zero priority. Fixed anyway, the issue was the old boundary being geometrically incompatible with the current correct one.

There is and was a real issue with the lake itself in that part of the water area was tagged (not glued) on the admin boundaries, I've redrawn that as a fix for the municipalities for which we've fixed the admin boundaries of, but it is a latent problem for Neuchâtel itself.
e-i-n-s (2026-03-16 09:37:08+00:00): This change breaks the country list.

Indonesia is relation with Id 304751.

The country is now defined 4 times:
304751 (original)
20317643
20324598
20333713
FajrAl (2026-03-18 06:20:00+00:00): admin_level=2 itu digunakan untuk batas administrasi negara.
Harap pahami pedoman tag di https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Template:Admin_level.

Saya harus revert perubahan ini.
mavl (2026-03-14 08:08:40+00:00): Здравствуйте. Сибирский тракт не существует. Не нужно добавлять дорогам названия, которые не являюстя названиями.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice  
  
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/topic/134844
Рыженко Леонид Игоревич (2026-03-27 06:01:39+00:00): Если Вы не знаете названия дороги, это не значит, что его не существует.
mavl (2026-03-27 07:04:04+00:00): > Если Вы не знаете названия дороги, это не значит, что его не существует.  
  
Разумеется.  
Подскажите, пожалуйста, из какого источника взято название этой дороги?  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/914657631
Рыженко Леонид Игоревич (2026-04-02 09:12:48+00:00): Интересующий вас источник - Рыженко Л.И. Великий Сибирский тракт: справочник.  2-е изд. испр. и доп. под ред. док. ист. наук В.Г. Рыженко – Омск : Ассоциация «Сибирский тракт», 2022. – 391 с., схемы.
YomanNH (2026-03-13 09:33:55+00:00): Dzięki!
eggie (2026-03-13 09:03:33+00:00): Tip.. op een footway hoef je geen bicycle=no en horse=no te taggen. Dat is default.
Groet,
eggie
Bienson (2026-03-14 04:25:00+00:00): Immer noch Typo, doppelt überlagende Flächen, unsinniges Industriegebiet-Tag
kingkingHK (2026-03-13 11:58:58+00:00): Is it not `covered=yes`?
bxl-forever (2026-03-16 14:20:45+00:00): Hello,

Pardon me but there seem to be a few issues with this changeset again.

First, the "layer=1" tag you added on most buildings is unwanted.  The "layer" concept in OSM is when objects are piled upon each other—e.g. a bridge above another road, or possibly a building partly above another one—but it makes no sense where objects do not overlap anything.

Some example here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1488525617
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1488525616
+ many more (you added 57 houses, most of them have this tag).

Most importantly, you added "ref:GB:uprn=10093769469" to most houses you added.  As far as I can see, you copied an identical value to each building, as if you had blindly copied and pasted tags to every house you added.

This shouldn’t happen.  We expect each house to have a different value, being its unique property reference number.

If you do not know what those tags are for, please do not add them, because by doing so you are corrupting data on OpenStreetMap.
LordGarySugar (2026-03-17 04:22:00+00:00): I've cleaned up all the buildings here, including removing the tags that were incorrectly copied from existing buildings, namely ref:GB:uprn= , addr:postcode= & addr:street= .
b-jazz (2026-03-16 05:27:10+00:00): RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1488525955

When drawing golf course areas (such as greens, fairways, bunkers, tees, etc.), please be aware that the ways used to outline those areas can't cross over each other. Fairway outlines shouldn't cross over greens or bunkers or other fairways for example. If you could go back and clean up where you've made this mistake, that would be helpful. But more importantly, if you could stop from doing this in the future, it would be greatly appreciated. Please read the wiki for instructions and examples of how to better map golf courses: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls. If you have any questions about golf course mapping, feel free to reach out.
Bienson (2026-03-14 04:29:16+00:00): Also öffentlich zugänglich für Fußgänger, nur nicht für Fahrzeuge?
NeisBot (2026-03-13 09:15:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/4346721811 v10

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Dentist office"

#MapWithoutSpam
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-04 12:58:23+00:00): Additionally, the address of the POI was changed, to one that doesn't match the current website, without actually moving the POI. 

Reverted re-adding SEO spam tagging for POI with blatantly promotional description=* and malformed tags, and and cleaned up other tags in changeset 185089629.

https://osm.org/changeset/185089629
Pekky (2026-04-13 11:38:14+00:00): - ingang is aan de westkant. Volgens mij al correct ingetekend. 
- Het gebouw is niet van GeoSquare, maar volgens mij ook niet meer van Cronos. 
- GeoSquare - Locus bestaat niet meer als bedrijf
YomanNH (2026-03-13 09:35:48+00:00): Hej, highway=track to droga polna/leśna. Ten kawałek drogi nie prowadzi ani do lasu, ani na pole, więc lepiej byłoby go zmapować jako highway=service.
AKx2 (2026-03-13 11:08:20+00:00): okej, poprawiłam
Digital Sadhu (2026-05-03 14:51:31+00:00): Hallo Casper, je hebt met deze changeset een kronkel veroorzaakt in het stukje Fokkesteeg (fietspad) vanaf de Deldenseschans naar het oosten door het toevoegen van de twee aangesloten voetpaden. Zou je dit willen herstellen?
Friendly_Ghost (2026-05-26 00:26:03+00:00): Hoi. Ik denk dat je het hier hebt over https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13644826758. Als je kijkt op de luchtbeelden en de BGT dataset, dan zie je dat hier inderdaad een flauwe bocht in het fietspad zit. 

De aanliggende grasvelden zijn nog niet aangepast. Daar was ik niet aan toegekomen, en dat heeft ook niet mijn prioriteit. Voel je vrij om daar ook "een kronkel in te veroorzaken."
Digital Sadhu (2026-05-26 22:25:31+00:00): Aha, dus dit was de bedoeling! Bedankt voor de opheldering. Ik kom er weleens maar heb nooit beseft dat er een flauwe kromming in het fietspad zit. Heb de landuse geupdatet zodat ook die beter klopt met de werkelijke situatie en niet meer "botst" met het fietspad.
Friendly_Ghost (2026-05-28 08:13:42+00:00): Helemaal goed. Fijn dat dat opgehelderd is.
eggie (2026-03-13 10:10:14+00:00): Dag melluh,

Kijk bj schuin genomen luchtfoto's nooit daar de daken en ga vervolgens een gebouw aanpassen. Daar staat het gebouw niet. Dat is de vertekening door de foto.
Ik heb je edits hersteld.
MVG
eggie
rarad74 (2026-03-13 10:17:47+00:00): Tu pur si simplu iti bati joc de noi cu acel sorry. Nicio problema. Nu o sa mai ajunga nicio edotare a ta pe harta asta.
NeisBot (2026-03-13 10:06:51+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13644852691 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Punti di ricarica elettrica"
---
Ad esempio, una versione più neutra e fattuale del tuo testo potrebbe essere: "Punti di ricarica elettrica"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-21 17:33:13+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180218638
(Delete spam tags. First version)
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:06:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
NeisBot (2026-03-13 10:21:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13644866596 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "IT consulting office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-21 17:33:16+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180218641
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
trial (2026-03-13 15:41:52+00:00): Shouldn't we add access=no? As we know it's not accessible outside business hours (access is not no by default).
Jorisbo (2026-03-13 16:10:26+00:00): Hi Trial, Feel free to change it, kind regards, Joris
muralito (2026-03-13 18:40:52+00:00): Hi. You should revert all these changes of wikipedia tags to foreign languages.
NeisBot (2026-03-13 10:33:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13644903275 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Electroménager réparé"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-03-21 17:33:17+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/179802655
mos_next_door (2026-03-13 16:41:24+00:00): Hey, I think bridge and layer tags on way/728215774 were justified. The wooden path goes above the river, on the same level as the street, being its sidewalk actually
_AntonM_ (2026-03-27 18:28:03+00:00): The idea was to underline that path is above the ground. So there is no possibility to get on it.
iandees (2026-03-13 12:11:05+00:00): Hi! It looks like a node in this changeset was accidentally moved. This can happen when panning the map. The node has been moved back to its previous position.
Colossal Carol (2026-03-13 12:16:33+00:00): OK. Sorry :/
dcapillae (2026-03-13 13:28:51+00:00): Hola.

Este conjunto de cambios elimina varios edificios que realmente existen. He revertido los cambios para recuperar los edificios manteniendo los datos del concesionario que ha añadido.

Otro apunte: Si una clave tiene múltiples valores, se estos añaden separados por punto y como (;), por ejempo, «brand=Audi;Porsche;Maserati;Changan;Nissan;Holamotor» (corregido).

Gracias por los cambios.

Atentamente,
Daniel Capilla
dcapillae (2026-03-13 13:41:52+00:00): Hola de nuevo.

¿Cuántos concesionarios hay?

- Centro Porsche Málaga Concesionario Oficial – Grupo Safamotor
- Audi Málaga Velázquez Concesionario Oficial – Grupo Safamotor
- Concesionario Grupo Safamotor Málaga Velázquez

¿Son tres  o solo dos, Audi y Porsche?
Grupo Safamotor (2026-03-24 07:44:25+00:00): Hola, 
Hay varios, está Audi, Porsche, Maserati, Nissan, y Holamotor.
Si es cierto que  aparece Audi repetido dos veces, pero donde está ubicado es a pie de carretera de Avenida Andalucía, no el del aparcamiento.
dcapillae (2026-03-24 08:34:40+00:00): Hola.

¡Corregido! He eliminado el concesionario Audi repetido, dejando el que está ubicado a pie de carretera.

Cracias por su colaboración.
eggie (2026-03-13 11:42:30+00:00): Hoi.. Maxspeed 30 heb ik verwijderd van het fietspad.. sidewalk:right naast sidewalk=right gaf ook een foutmelding.  Gelijk naar aagepast.
Mapse
StC (2026-03-13 12:11:51+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre qui passe par là. Je m'occupe de la réparation.
MaxR_6429 (2026-03-13 12:29:52+00:00): Bonjour, 
J'ai ajouté la continuité dans le changeset suivant celui ci 
la continuité devrait être assurée
StC (2026-03-13 18:21:34+00:00): De mémoire, le segment de chemin a été ajouté dans une super-relation qui ne doit contenir que des relations, pas dans la sous-relation qui contient les chemins
NeisBot (2026-03-13 11:06:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 44 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1177114432 v1 | 24 crossings
https://osm.org/way/34734534 v7 | 19 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/3585942806 v4

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179804170
NeisBot (2026-03-13 11:09:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 14 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1395521550 v1 | 14 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/12917508728 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179804320
iandees (2026-03-13 12:11:31+00:00): Hi! It looks like a node in this changeset was accidentally moved. This can happen when panning the map. The node has been moved back to its previous position.
Roydon Olive (2026-03-15 02:32:30+00:00): The reason I left the construction tag on there is that there was still a barricade at one end of it, and construction equipment on it. Does your images show that being removed?
alokchauhan_Lyft (2026-03-19 08:49:39+00:00): Hi Roydon Olive,
 I’m Alok, a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. Thanks for reaching out. Based on Lyft-owned aerial imagery (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1YJpMEQm6Rk6IA6Nnun5rIg-FtmNTAgXV/view?usp=sharing)  from October 2025, construction at the site appears complete. Additionally, recent Lyft telemetry data (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1q3yqTTMmJfxNLy9PMgR07Tch1NDz5dX3/view?usp=sharing) from last week shows active vehicle movement along these routes. I hope this helps clarify my edits, happy to answer any further questions.

Happy mapping!
Regards,
Alok
notmyproblem1 (2026-03-13 11:13:50+00:00): I confirm that, this edit, was made by me with JOSM.
eggie (2026-03-13 11:47:38+00:00): Dag Mvoorn De school staat al in OSM op het schoolterrein. Een adresnode is er ook al.
Het is nu dubbel gemapt. Ik pas het weer even aan.

MVG
eggie