piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SpinOff (2026-05-28 21:44:05+00:00): Jeśli zaznaczysz ciek wodny krzyżujący się z drogą, to iD zasugeruje Ci dodatnie przepustu. Przepust to przepust, a most to most. Nie mapujemy fikcji.
AndyB_66 (2026-05-26 07:57:22+00:00): revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183176629
ChrissW-R1 (2026-05-27 21:53:37+00:00): Please check https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:payment:* to enter the payment information.
jayaddison (2026-06-08 18:46:19+00:00): What do you think about tagging the windmill and lighthouse with building=miniature to indicate that they are replicas?

I'm asking after noticing a discussion thread about the lighthouse on the osm.town Mastodon instance: https://osm.town/@MagicPocketbook462/116714147690144363
Frans S (2026-05-27 12:30:08+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
When you see clustered mappings like this one :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1487795864/history#map=19/15.313311/32.539402
Please divide it into individual buildings.
Best regards
JFL-75 (2026-05-27 13:08:21+00:00): Hi Fran S,
Good point, thanks for your remark.
Best regards.
jfl
DerKaiserschmarren (2026-05-26 11:16:41+00:00): Als du den https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1522325416 geändert hast, hat eine innere Fläche vom Multipolygon Wienerwald eine andere innere Fläche vom Multipolygon  Wienerwald geschnitten.

Eine Relation wo sich zwei innere Berreiche überschneiten ist unbrauchbar - das heißt der Wald wird dann nicht Angezeigt.

Ich habe es jetzt behoben!
Du brauchst nichts mehr machen, es ist jetzt behoben! Ich habe den https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6821131027 so verschoben, dass sich jetzt nichts mehr überschneidet. Jetzt gibt es den Wald wieder!

Nur so als Hinweis, bitte nicht auf die Relationen vergessen ;)
Liebe Grüße
gt3400 (2026-05-26 15:27:02+00:00): Oje, das habe ich nicht bemerkt! Danke fürs beheben.
DerKaiserschmarren (2026-05-27 06:28:29+00:00): Gern geschehen :)
BRCKD (2026-05-26 08:31:12+00:00): Lasallestraße anstatt Zuckerbusch - Zusätzlich noch Gehweg vor Haus 1-11 Herweghstraße
特爾_Tyer (2026-05-26 08:24:48+00:00): 缺少鴻邑時代園邸的公寓用地繪製
woodpeck (2026-05-26 08:38:33+00:00): There was already a beach here, no need to duplicate it!
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-13 01:56:11+00:00): Reverted SEO spam POI with advertising/nonsensical tags added with explicit source=* of Google Maps in violation of OSM policy and potentially copyright and contract law, in changeset 184038145

https://osm.org/changeset/184038145
rik_ (2026-05-30 07:11:21+00:00): Hallo Rhoon,

ich habe dieses CS reverted, der Weg existiert definitiv – ich bin ihn vor Ort abgefahren. Habe den genauen Verlauf aus einer GPS-Aufzeichnung übernommen und am Ende des Weges noch ein noexit-Tag spendiert.

Viele Grüße

rik
Rhoon (2026-05-31 15:57:25+00:00): Hallo rik,
danke. Ich dachte da wäre ein User-Note ("existiert nicht mehr") gewesen, sonst lösche ich Wege eigentlich nicht.
vg
Rhoon
ticho2 (2026-06-28 20:44:14+00:00): Je treba tento polygon? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1522332469

Uz tam "pod nim" je existujuci polygon s amenity=kindergarten, tento tam podla mna nic uzitocne neprinasa.
ScarlettB (2026-06-29 04:15:36+00:00): Right you are, that's absolutely not supposed to be there, no idea how I missed it.

Also if you see residential landuse under panelak blocks and not much else, those add nothing of value either feel free to bin those too. They're leftovers from when I broke up the giant resi polygon that covered the entirety of KV and wasn't yet sure where to leave them or not. I'm removing them as I go, only leaving those under (clusters of) single family homes or gated communities, basically whenever the houses are fenced.
ticho2 (2026-06-29 11:45:28+00:00): Thanks for the context for these. Frankly, those under panelaks here in DD do not bother me too much, apart from consistency - some panelaks have them, some don't, some such areas are only around the buildings themselves, others (e.g. around Pribišova/Majerníkova) are beneath the whole "block", including the inner grassyards.
ScarlettB (2026-06-29 15:34:04+00:00): Yeah, it was done in a bit of a hurry with the full intention of dealing with it later.

The rationale for deletion is - the building itself doesn't need residential landuse, because that's implied by the residential building. Including the closest greenery would be akin to stretching resi landuse over front yards of single houses, but then, there's nothing else there than footways and said greenery, both of which we map in detail anyway. Besides, both are public, so there's no real reason to have residential stretched over it. Residential landuse itself, as I understand it, is really only useful as a placeholder for areas where more detail cannot be determined or mapped for whatever reason.
osmviborg (2026-05-26 10:22:21+00:00): Den er så "highway=trunk", rettet.
multimodaal (2026-06-06 10:29:05+00:00): Hoi , bedankt voor je wijziging. Je hebt deze weg een algemene access=no gegeven, terwijl het publiek er wel mag komen (in ieder geval lopend). Beter zetten we dan alleen de categorien die er niet mogen komen op no , zoals vehicle of motor_vehicle om misverstanden / foutjes te voorkomen. Zie ook de access-wiki. 
Vraagje over de nu dichtgezette toegang voor fietsers: waar is dat op gebaseerd?

Volgens de site van het daar gevestigde bedrijf kan je hier wel fietsen:
https://www.houtrijk.com/ => sport
"De uitdagende paden en het gevarieerde terrein maken het tot een geliefde plek voor hardlopers en mountainbikers"

Thx voor je reactie!
 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/460241870/history#map=16/52.42288/4.73506&layers=N
trial (2026-06-15 09:47:10+00:00): Bonjour "Bassin du Moulin" n'est pas un nom propre mais seulement un nom descriptif, à ne pas mettre dans name.
La couche IGN MNT LIDAR HD montre la surface de manière plus précise.
Et enfin la continuité de la rivière doit être préservée : le bief doit se jeter dans le bassin, l'eau du bassin repartir par la conduite du moulin.
AndersAndersson (2026-05-26 21:27:39+00:00): What is the reason?
The road is leading to the parking and the main reception. Why should it be service? It is part of the public street network.
AndersAndersson (2026-05-30 21:25:15+00:00): No answer. I will change it back.
Geocrest (2026-06-29 18:02:09+00:00): Hi AndersAndersson. Thank you for explaining the function and connectivity, and thank you for making the corrections.
lankapuhelin (2026-05-27 07:39:25+00:00): Hei, lyhytaikaisissa (alle 6 kk) highwayn construction-tyyppisissä tilanteissa suositellaan käytettäväksi conditional access -rajoituksia, poistit tällaisen tekemäni merkinnän. Lisätietoa https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dconstruction
kartoittaa (2026-05-27 07:43:32+00:00): Moikka, kiitos ja pahoittelut! Tein tämän setin GoMapilla puhelimella juuri sinun tekemän päivityksen jälkeen, niin saatoin samalla vahingossa kumota tuon muutoksesi. 😅
kartoittaa (2026-05-27 07:47:33+00:00): Korjasin tämän, pahoittelut vielä!
lankapuhelin (2026-05-27 08:01:32+00:00): Ei hätää, ymmärrettävä juttu! Kiitos vastauksesta sekä tekemästäsi palautuksesta.
Yog Sot (2026-05-27 00:29:27+00:00): restrykcja destination dotyczy wyłącznie pojazdów, co naprawiłem
Stefan_89 (2026-05-26 09:34:38+00:00): Hinweis vergessen:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5296801
dott-Frasca-Trapani (2026-05-28 07:13:17+00:00): aspetta, l'edificio è costruito per essere una banca, ma la banca in questo edificio non c'è più, né la Banca Sicula, che venne incorporata dalla Banca Commerciale Italiana, né sono rimasti uffici che svolgono attività bancarie. quindi levo amenity=bank.
Antonino_Faro (2026-05-28 09:27:22+00:00): Ok ok ricevuto, grazie mille per la correzione.
Se per la banca non c'è più e quindi l'edifico è in disuso allora metterei cosi:
disused:amenity=bank
disused:name=Banca Sicula
disused=yes
E così via

In questo modo si capisce che la banca non è più presente li ma almeno c'è una storia nel tag e indica così chiaramente l'edificio che era prima.

Confermami se è tutto così se puoi.
Grazie mille ancora
dott-Frasca-Trapani (2026-05-28 09:41:24+00:00): ah, sì, hai più che ragione.
l'edificio, per fortuna come edificio non è in disuso, così centrale, figurati, è pieno di negozi. non so sinceramente se la gente del posto lo identifichi ancora con il nome "Banca Sicula", però questo nome è ben evidente sul portale su Via Torrearsa e il monogramma BS sta in cima a tutte le finestre del piano terra, sulle tre vie adiacenti. io che sto qui da poco, 
allora lo rimetto il tag che ho levato, con il prefisso "disused:".
grazie per la correzione.
Antonino_Faro (2026-05-28 10:10:42+00:00): E di che ; )
Se pensi che sia così noto da essere un punto di riferimento per le persone del luogo allora conviene mettere il nome come loc_name
loc_name=Banca Sicula
NorthCrab_upload (2026-05-26 10:12:03+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.

"Zaczerlany":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1522417630
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1522417631
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1522417632
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1522417633
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1522417634
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1522417635
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1522417636
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1522417637
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1522417638
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1522417639

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
BCNorwich (2026-05-27 06:15:50+00:00): Hi, it looks like you've accidentally misaligned several other features as well. Please see here:- https://tinyurl.com/mpbdtkkp

It looks like this happend when the landuse=residential area, Way: 984419104 was somehow dragged out of alignment. It looks like you've edited this way several times over a few days.

It might be best to ask the OSM Data Working Group to try to correct the many problems, data@openstreetmap.org

Regards Bernard.
Car Tographer (2026-05-27 09:08:09+00:00): Thank you for finding this. I've started to repair some of the dragged nodes, I'll fix some more when I have the time later.
Car Tographer (2026-05-27 11:38:36+00:00): I believe I have fixed this now. Will check back when geofabrik's inspector updates itself.
hatul (2026-06-15 10:14:07+00:00): שלום אחאב, מדובר על גב. אם אתה רוצה להוסיף נקודה חדשה עם נושא אחר אז תוסיף ואל תערוך

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184129597
gurglypipe (2026-05-26 10:03:44+00:00): In case the URI for the London Gazette breaks in future, the exact TRO is:

Lancaster City Council (Ridge Estate Zone) and (Marsh Estate Zone) (Prohibition of Heavy Commercial Vehicles) Order 1990 and Width Restriction Order 1990

It was published in issue 52078 of the Gazette, pages 3527-3528
Fizzie-DWG (2026-07-12 03:49:24+00:00): DWG revert - apparent sock-puppet import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185570831
Negreheb (2026-06-04 19:47:22+00:00): "Su" und nicht "So", weil "Sunday" und nicht "Sonntag" :)
HellMap (2026-05-26 18:45:15+00:00): Hello,

Please do not add names as descriptions to elements. Names should be official or at least well-known current names that can be verified somewhere in other sources. Former and non-existent feature explanations should be placed in description fields.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions

Thanks
fortera_au (2026-05-27 00:28:59+00:00): Hi, what is the source for this? I can't find anything about Schoenthal in SA other than a winery?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183198985
ChrissW-R1 (2026-05-27 21:57:52+00:00): https://osm.org/way/234317886

Which is the right surface? You added two tags with different values.
TrickyFoxy (2026-07-01 10:12:56+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184905396
hahae (2026-06-24 10:51:46+00:00): 您好，变更注释要写细一点，然后请您不要随意删除并重新添加道路，这样会损坏公交关系，谢谢。
gurglypipe (2026-05-26 10:27:44+00:00): In case the URI for the London Gazette breaks in future, the exact TRO is:

Lancaster City Council (Ridge Estate Zone) and (Marsh Estate Zone) (Prohibition of Heavy Commercial Vehicles) Order 1990 and Width Restriction Order 1990

It was published in issue 52078 of the Gazette, pages 3527-3528
TrickyFoxy (2026-07-18 00:28:48+00:00): 👋 Что вы пытались обозначить?
Dodko (2026-05-27 07:01:14+00:00): Adresu som vymazal, tá patrila rodinnému domu.
Adresa sa pridáva až keď je budova skolaudovaná a pridelená obcou.
René888 (2026-05-27 08:21:07+00:00): OK, ďakujem za opravu.
Znaika (2026-06-10 16:17:33+00:00): Hi black_bike. Das Gebäude ist abgerissen. VG, Znaika
Znaika (2026-06-10 16:19:42+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180008504
fortera_au (2026-05-27 00:26:55+00:00): Hi, what's the source for this new suburb? I can't find anything indicating it exists
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183199815
gurglypipe (2026-05-26 10:39:33+00:00): In case the URI for the London Gazette breaks in future, the exact TRO is:

Lancaster City Council (Ridge Estate Zone) and (Marsh Estate Zone) (Prohibition of Heavy Commercial Vehicles) Order 1990 and Width Restriction Order 1990

It was published in issue 52078 of the Gazette, pages 3527-3528
BCNorwich (2026-05-27 05:42:44+00:00): Hi, There is access to these footpaths so I've removed the access=no tags.

Regards Bernard
BCNorwich (2026-05-27 05:46:58+00:00): There are no formal names for these driveways, and formal names are not usually numbers anyway. 

There is private access to the driveways so the access=no tags should be removed.

It would be better to add addresses to the individual houses.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2026-06-04 06:30:51+00:00): No response, so I've made the amendments.
Fizzie-DWG (2026-07-12 03:49:25+00:00): DWG revert - apparent sock-puppet import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185570831
EdoBoo (2026-06-01 13:28:33+00:00): Awesome job! GG
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-26 12:01:20+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
Is the name real?
eggie (2026-05-26 11:38:35+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback Mainstreet stond al op de kaart. Ik heb je info samengevoegd en fixed de postcode. Geen spatie svp.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
purplefractal (2026-06-09 14:44:10+00:00): Hi, this changeset appears to contain a lot of buildings that have been added from some kind of AI tool without checking. A lot of them seem to poorly match up with the satellite imagery (L-shaped buildings have been mapped as rectangular)
Please could you remove or redraw the buildings that are of poor quality?
woodpeck (2026-06-09 18:14:33+00:00): This appears to be the same low-quality automated building mapping that I have recently reverted from https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Surveyor%20Lewinsky and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/surveyor_jr ... I will remove the data.
purplefractal (2026-06-09 21:15:24+00:00): Thanks :)
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-26 12:01:16+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
Is the name real?
mueschel (2026-05-27 18:19:06+00:00): Hi,
something went wrong here. You added strange tags to hundreds of roads, e.g.

alleyResourceId 
batch 
contributor 
process_id
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-26 12:00:59+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
Are the names real?
eggie (2026-05-26 11:49:18+00:00): Dag jens.. Er zijn al adresnodes. Dus je hoeft niet nogmaals een adres toe te voegen. Doe het svp dan wel volledig, want in welke gemeente staan deze kerken?

MVG
eggie
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-26 12:00:56+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
Are the names real?
mueschel (2026-05-27 18:20:31+00:00): Reminder: Please check the tags before uploading. It's "water", not "walter".
vanagaudi (2026-05-31 17:23:01+00:00): Es wurden fehlerhafte ALKIS-Daten nach OSM übertragen.
SaPatz (2026-06-01 05:14:18+00:00): In ALKIS lautet die Straßenbezeichnung auch G.-Hofmacher-Platz. ALKIS orientiert sich an der Schreibweise des Beschlusses der Stadträte bzw. Gemeinderäte. Eine Einheitlichkeit wäre hier wünscheswert.
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-26 12:00:51+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
Are the names real?
jayaddison (2026-05-27 20:06:08+00:00): Thank you for adding the hotel to OpenStreetMap!  Doing this will allow the hotel to appear in various apps and amenity searches.

However: please choose to display the hotel as _either_ node 13882574456 OR way 604661067 - but not both.

This is to follow the "one feature, one OSM element" good practice: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
streckenkundler (2026-05-26 12:18:57+00:00): Was ist Sinn und Zweck, in der Fläche, die mit landuse=forest erfasst ist, 146 Punkte mit natural=tree zu setzen?

Sowas ist Quatsch und gehört raus!

streckenkundler
streckenkundler (2026-05-28 20:17:28+00:00): entsorgt....
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183323335
streckenkundler (2026-05-28 20:33:57+00:00): Bitte teilnehmen:

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/natural-tree-in-waldern/144181

streckenkundler
dieterdreist (2026-05-28 22:19:51+00:00): @streckenkundler, dass du die Löschung hier wenigstens gelinkt hast finde ich gut, aber das Löschen an sich halte ich für unbegründet.
Supaplex030 (2026-05-29 15:25:15+00:00): Hallo Johannes, herzlich Willkommen bei OSM! Was User streckenkundler zum Ausdruck bringen wollte, aber leider nicht in freundliche, erklärende Worte für einen neuen User verpackt hat: In OSM vermeiden wir die Erfassung von Einzelbäumen in Wäldern, da es in der Natur der Sache liegt, dass es sehr viele davon gibt und sie sich regelmäßig verändern. Zudem ist die Erfassung der einzelnen Standorte nicht zuverlässig/genau genug möglich.

Ich könnte mir vorstellen, dass du (testweise?) mit Verfahren für Objekterkennung oder DGM-DOM-Differenzen gearbeitet hast? Das ist sehr spannend, aber OSM ist vermutlich nicht der beste Ort um die Ergebnisse zu hinterlegen (Seiten wie uMap (https://umap.openstreetmap.de/de/) könnten dafür besser sein, ohne die Ergebnisse direkt in die globale OSM-Datenbank zu laden).

Erzähl gern mehr zu deinem Ansatz oder Beweggründen, wenn du magst, z. B. im oben verlinkten Foren-Thread. Dann findet sich bestimmt eine gute Lösung, die auch ohne Upload in die OSM-Datenbank funktioniert.

Lg, Alex
HaraldBk (2026-07-02 23:24:33+00:00): I thought vehicle=no was a mistake too, when I saw it the first time.
But this is how it is documented in the German Wiki article "DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen kartieren" so many people set it this way. People told me it is not an conflict, because the more specific "motor_vehicle=yes" overwrites the more general "vehicle=no".
WilliamHarrison (2026-07-03 06:03:25+00:00): @HaraldBk I did not know of this, thank you for the correction!
fortera_au (2026-05-27 00:26:21+00:00): Hi, is there a reason why Beadell Street has been split into a bunch of short segments? You don't need to split a way for a road where another comes off of it, routers can handle that fine.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183202918
eggie (2026-05-26 11:44:13+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  De hoofdtag is amenity=drinking_water  Dat ontbreekt en geeft daarom geen pictogram.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-05-26 14:39:59+00:00): Als bovenstaand aangepast
Alice0356 (2026-06-05 16:15:15+00:00): Bedankt!
StC (2026-05-26 12:52:26+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre qui passe par là. Je m'occupe de la réparation
biologeek (2026-05-27 12:16:42+00:00): 🙏 je ne l'avais pas vu sur Vespucci
ordinatous (2026-05-29 04:16:18+00:00): Bonjour,
je n'avais pas vu que tu avais ajouté la station.
En réalité il y a bien plus qu'une simple station , je n'ai pas encore pris le temps d'extraire les images de la dashcam, j'y retournerais pour bien détailler.
Cdlt.
Rommar (2026-05-29 09:01:59+00:00): Je me suis basé sur l'open data Prix Carburants et j'ai positionné la station grâce à l'image satellite ESRI. Sur celle-ci on voit une station de lavage je pense, mais sans certitude je ne l'ai pas ajouté. Je te laisse détailler le reste ;-)
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2026-05-27 10:45:55+00:00): Hi! The mapbox satellite imagery is outdated/inprecise in this area. The geometry was carefully aligned using official geodesic data. I will revert. In Quebec, please ask before realigning roads. Thanks and have a nice day!
World_Winner (2026-05-31 07:22:01+00:00): Hello ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy,

Thank You for taking the time to explain. I was not aware that the alignment was based on official geodesic data, and I trusted available imagery, which clearly is not a source to be used there.

I will double‑check local capturing rules in Quebec before touching alignments like that again.

Thank You again, and happy mapping!
vanagaudi (2026-05-31 16:47:29+00:00): In OSM werden keine Straßennamen abgekürzt.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen#Abk%C3%BCrzungen_(nicht_verwenden!)
NorthCrab_upload (2026-05-26 17:43:43+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13882826435

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-05 11:27:55+00:00): Reverted SEO spam changes to POI: deletion/defacement of valid address tags and alteration of brand=* to non-canonical value, in changeset 183690518

https://osm.org/changeset/183690518
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-05 11:27:45+00:00): Reverted SEO spam changes to POI: deletion/defacement of valid address tags and alteration of brand=* to non-canonical value, in changeset 183690518

https://osm.org/changeset/183690518
user_5359 (2026-06-25 10:43:24+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2sfA. What is the mean of the tag grma_project = yes?
hahae (2026-07-04 01:04:30+00:00): 您好，左转道没有单独画的，除非是那种隔离开的
wolfy1339 (2026-06-07 23:49:23+00:00): Please don't add duplicate features, the dam is already mapped osm.org/way/39221603

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183803262
scarapella (2026-07-27 17:06:40+00:00): My apologies. I didn't notice the dam was already mapped. It didn't occur to me that a highway=* would also be tagged as a waterway=dam.  

Wouldn't it be better to split the two into different elements for clarity.  

For example:
*  the name=* element is now Barrage Sartigan, but I supposed the name of the road is actually Rue du Barrage-Sartigan across the dam as well on both banks
* the way is tagged as bridge=yes and a waterway=dam.  

Cheers,
scarapella
Car Tographer (2026-05-26 13:14:45+00:00): Hi, it looks like you deleted a footpath which seems to be visible on satellite images, running between the river Ouse and Egrets Way. Was this a mistake or does this not exist on the ground?
Anonomous46786532566 (2026-05-26 13:19:16+00:00): Well noted, yes this was an error. Thank you for correcting my mistake.
Car Tographer (2026-05-26 13:38:07+00:00): I have done a partial revert of this changeset so the footpath should now exist on the map. See changeset 183209363.
SomeoneElse (2026-05-31 15:10:13+00:00): I've re-added the missing bit to the Sussex Ouse Valley Way - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183453260 .  Does this look OK?
dmjab13 (2026-05-26 16:02:00+00:00): this change is incorrect
melcomsx (2026-05-26 18:12:38+00:00): I try to improve
t_ja (2026-05-26 14:56:55+00:00): Ahoj,
takmer polovica z pridaných farností ma nastavené website=https://www.mojakomunita.sk/web/farnost-papradno , asi chybička pri kopírovaní.