piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ktmadsagency (2025-01-18 07:10:11+00:00): https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/19PMUWQcXZ9vNDzGSki5UKZVbjX8Vk2NjMyVir7KiEu0/edit?usp=drivesdk
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1q91TFZIxuZ_ol5cOW2xkoq7X0XJwfH_d
https://sites.google.com/view/ktmadsagency/trang-ch%E1%BB%A7
https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer?mid=1dC2q7aQZYZ3dU5cUQI9DeJzYtHX36nQ
https://ktmadsagency.blogspot.com/2025/01/rent-facebook-account.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ALyEcwgxF4o
https://x.com/ktmadsagency/status/1879474586368327924
https://creators.spotify.com/pod/show/ktmadsagency/episodes/Reliable-Facebook-Ad-Account-Rentals-for-Your-Business-e2tla70/a-abo0fav
https://www.scoop.it/topic/rent-facebook-account/p/4163534910/2025/01/18/optimize-your-ads-with-facebook-agency-accounts-for-rent
Taya_S (2025-01-18 13:37:38+00:00): Reverted SEO vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161491820
jeslop (2025-01-18 09:00:51+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161482904
jeslop (2025-01-18 09:00:52+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161482904
jeslop (2025-01-18 09:00:53+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161482904
shanhulittle (2025-01-19 09:51:21+00:00): 感谢您对道路等级的编辑。
但是，primary, secondary, tertiary不能简单等同于省道、县道、乡道。要和本身道路的道路等级（一级-三级公路）、车道数、限速以及片区规划等统一考虑。
不要随意将高等级道路改为低等级道路。
martinst (2025-01-18 14:07:53+00:00): Privatwege werden in OSM nicht gelöscht sondern bekommen ein access=private .
Way 59110674 ist im Luftbild sichtbar, bitte sowas nicht löschen.
Evros1969 (2025-01-18 16:38:03+00:00): Allo Martinst Nach der Schranke Rechts ist eine Garage und Keine Zufahrtweg Hat Vielleicht der User Der Dach mit Zufahrt Verwechselt Vor der Schranke Ist Eine Parkplatz Privat Vom Amtsgericht Keine Zufahrt Ich Wahr vor Ort Ich Habe Keine Gesehen Das Fotografieren ist Auch Untersagt lieber Nicht Machen Es Drohen Ärgern und Anzeigen Die Gelände wird Vom Security Überwacht Jezt ist Die Frage Wie hat er Die wiege Kartierz von Luftbildern Es Gibt Eindeutig Keine Zufahrten
martinst (2025-01-18 19:28:46+00:00): Ich kenne die Situation vor Ort nicht. Aber Du hast recht, die Wege waren alle nicht gut eingezeichnet und sollten entfernt werden, solange es keine Möglichkeit gibt sie genauer einzuzeichnen.
Wenn man die Wege im Innenhof vom Luftbild abzeichnet und access=private dranschreibt ist das auf jeden fall legal.
jeslop (2025-01-18 08:59:22+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161482870
Supaplex (2025-01-29 02:22:21+00:00): 匯入的政府開放資料地址點位不必刪除，與建築、商家有同樣地址同時存在無妨
jeslop (2025-01-18 08:59:23+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161482870
jeslop (2025-01-18 08:59:24+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161482870
jeslop (2025-01-18 08:59:25+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161482870
jeslop (2025-01-18 09:02:19+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161482951
jeslop (2025-01-18 09:02:20+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161482951
jeslop (2025-01-18 09:02:21+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161482951
jeslop (2025-01-18 09:02:22+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161482951
BCNorwich (2025-01-19 08:10:31+00:00): Way: 1352277420, Way: 1352277421 are remove as they duplicate existing highways.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2025-01-19 08:04:00+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've removed the highways Way: 1352277435 and Way: 1352277436, mainly because they duplicate existing highways and that the tag highway=road is not an OSM valid tag. Please tag the appropriate highway status tag, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Droad

Way: 1352277437 and Way: 1352277438 are clearly tracks, I've amended and joined to the highway network.

Regards Bernard.
Firefishy (2025-02-27 11:28:49+00:00): Appreciate the additions! Thank you. Local knowledge is awesome.
jeslop (2025-01-18 09:02:23+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161482951
jeslop (2025-01-18 09:03:33+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161482978
Edelsalami (2025-01-18 09:34:41+00:00): Hallo Nordgork alias Streetview247, du hast das Waldgebiet an der Lehnerstraße entfernt und stattdessen das Wohngebiet darüber erweitert. Dort ist aber keine durchgehende Bebauung zu sehen und auch das Kataster zeigt dort eine Freifläche an. Magst du deine Änderung begründen? Danke. Gruß
jeslop (2025-01-18 09:03:34+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161482978
NorthCrab_upload (2025-01-18 08:11:17+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Zawoja":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12511849287
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12511849288
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12511849289

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2025-01-18 08:11:18+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/265997363

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
aTarom (2025-01-18 08:17:22+00:00): WoW
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
jeslop (2025-01-18 09:03:35+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161482978
shanhulittle (2025-01-19 09:50:34+00:00): 感谢您对道路等级的编辑。
但是，primary, secondary, tertiary不能简单等同于省道、县道、乡道。要和本身道路的道路等级（一级-三级公路）、车道数、限速以及片区规划等统一考虑。
不要随意将高等级道路改为低等级道路。
jeslop (2025-01-18 09:03:36+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161482978
jeslop (2025-01-18 09:03:37+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161482978
jeslop (2025-01-18 09:04:43+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161483001
jeslop (2025-01-18 09:04:44+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161483001
jeslop (2025-01-18 09:04:45+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161483001
jeslop (2025-01-18 09:04:46+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161483001
silversurfer83 (2025-01-18 14:52:57+00:00): Welcome back

I'd like to point you to
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:military%3Dbunker
please check the lower part of the article. According to your description I'd venture to guess this is an abandoned or even ruined bunker. This can and should be reflected in the tags used.

Should you have any questions just ask

silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161481972
jeslop (2025-01-18 09:06:28+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161483052
jeslop (2025-01-18 09:06:29+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161483052
jeslop (2025-01-18 09:06:30+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161483052
GerdP (2025-11-26 05:20:06+00:00): Radtour war am 17.1.2025
jeslop (2025-01-18 09:07:09+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161483072
literan (2025-01-18 10:05:20+00:00): еще одна небольшая поправка: не стоит в поле "Название" ставить слова типа "Парикмахерская", "Цветы" - обычно это просто текст с вывески.

см. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#%D0%98%D0%BC%D1%8F_%E2%80%93_%D1%8D%D1%82%D0%BE_%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%B8_%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%BA%D0%BE
rlalbert (2025-02-02 19:42:25+00:00): Спасибо за комментарий! Сделал такие подписи, потому что не имел информации о названиях юрлиц. Действительно, логичнее в таких случаях просто не писать название до выяснения конкретики. Так и буду делать.
literan (2025-02-03 06:38:47+00:00): тут еще такой момент: название парикмахерской/магазина может отличаться от юрлица, которому оно принадлежит/которое им управляет (но может и совпадать, конечно). Для названия юрлица/ИП применяют тег operator. А надпись на вывеске можно засунуть в тег inscription, например:

name=Снежана
operator=ООО "Светлый путь"
inscription=Парикмахерская

это прям полный набор тегов (но нужнее всего из них, конечно, name)
jeslop (2025-01-18 09:07:10+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161483072
elsy1 (2025-01-18 10:38:59+00:00): answer my comment on your previous changeset
jeslop (2025-01-18 09:07:11+00:00): Reverted on changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161483072
unameht (2025-01-18 14:46:13+00:00): I sentieri che sono stati cancellati sono esistenti nella realtà (ch'ho camminato sopra, posso fare foto per dimostrarne la visibilità e l'uso frequente), ma sono nati per creazione degli utenti e in alcuni casi stabiliti da anni, per cui andrebbero taggati come informal=yes

Il tratto di un sentiero che invece passa per la zona militare andrebbe taggato per specificare che l'accesso è vietato, ma anche in questo caso è arbitrario cancellare l'esistente (dimostrabilmente esistente).
Jrachi (2025-01-18 15:59:03+00:00): Se sono presenti cartelli che indicano il divieto di transito pedonale si aggiungono i tag di access=private (su OSM i militari esistono solo in modo più concreto di questo)
Cancellare un sentiero esistente è una 
forma di crimine democratico!
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-01-21 21:57:52+00:00): This changeset reversed the motorway direction. Please be careful.
reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161616801
kitsee (2025-01-20 00:14:47+00:00): Hi, i'm revert this as the original details were correct. The Cardiff International Arena is also known as the Utilita Arena for sponsorship reasons. The wikidata you linked is also extremely incomplete and doesn't even refer to a Wikipedia page. the original wikidata was missing the utilita alias so i've now added that.

Kind regards,
Kits

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161544217
kitsee (2025-01-20 00:19:23+00:00): on second thoughts, the name could be changed to "Utilita Arena Cardiff" and alt name to "Cardiff International Arena" but the wikidata should remain the same since it refers to the same building, just the new name was missing from the wikidata.
kitsee (2025-01-20 00:52:28+00:00): Hi again,
I want to apologize. I think I was a bit too quick on the revert button on this one when the only detail that was wrong was the wikidata link.  I've updated the details mostly back to what you set while also adding a bit. I've also added "Utilita Arena Cardiff" as a alternate name to the wikidata object. i'm not sure the wikidata procedures but that the main name of the object possibly should be updated too but i'm unsure on that one.

Kind regards,
Kits
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-05-30 20:37:28+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with promotional, misleading and nonsense tagging in changeset 183417711

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183417711
Lyssieth (2025-01-18 11:02:01+00:00): I'd maybe assign a tracktype=grade3 to it as well. It's unpaved, generally quite rough/holey, and pretty mixed. Hard dirt, usually.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2025-01-18 18:26:06+00:00): added
shanhulittle (2025-01-19 11:20:12+00:00): 汇丰公寓
shanhulittle (2025-01-19 11:21:23+00:00): 感谢您对道路等级的编辑。
但是，primary, secondary, tertiary不能简单等同于省道、县道、乡道。要和本身道路的道路等级（一级-三级公路）、车道数、限速以及片区规划等统一考虑。
不要随意将高等级道路改为低等级道路。
（第一条手滑了==）
Lejun (2025-01-18 11:16:01+00:00): Je sais pas comment OrganicMaps gère la chose, mais on essaie d'éviter un maximum de bourrer des descriptions dans le `name`. Ici tu peux à la place ajouter `park_ride=yes` ça devrait faire l'affaire.
pitfire (2025-01-18 11:05:37+00:00): Hi Scooty66,

ist "Auf der Heide" keine Einbahnstraße mehr?
Du hast jetzt "oneway=yes auf oneway=bicycle=no
erfasst. 
Um anzugeben, dass bei einer Einbahnstraße eine Ausnahme für bestimmte Fahrzeugklassen gilt, werden Unterschlüssel verwendet:

highway=* + oneway=yes + oneway:bicycle=no

Gruß pitfire
Scooty66 (2025-01-18 15:51:12+00:00): Hall pitfire, danke für den Hinweis. Doch, ist wie bisher eine Einbahnstraße, die jetz jedoch in Gegenrichtung für Radfahrer freigegeben wurde.
Da habe ich dann wohl die auf
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:oneway
beschriebene Syntax (Abschnitt Subkeys and exceptions
) missverstanden?
Falls ja, sorry, weißt Du ggf. dann die richtige Syntax? 
Scooty66
pitfire (2025-01-18 18:54:52+00:00): Hi Scooty66,
oneway=yes bleib und der Datensatz bekommt lediglich das Zusatzfeld als Unterschlüssel: (oneway:bicycle=no)

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:oneway#Einschr%C3%A4nkungen
good luck
Scooty66 (2025-01-19 07:59:17+00:00): Hallo pitfire,
danke für die Erläuterung, meine es jetzt dann so korrekt eingetragen zu haben. Änderung ist hochgeladen, diesmal aber mit Bitte um Prüfung, um ganz sicher zu gehen.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-01-18 12:16:46+00:00): Hi! Please do not realign already mapped data. In this region, it was aligned using official geodesic data. The aerial imagery added to the public editors are not aligned correctly most of the time and should not be used for alignment. Thanks!
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-21 08:38:21+00:00): Can you take a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4766606 ?

You added disused:amenity=pharmacy without removing healthcare=pharmacy

what you wanted to achieve?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-14 13:24:27+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/82456119/history has underground = 1 that was added in this edit
What was meant by this?
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-01-18 12:12:59+00:00): Hi! Please add access=private to private swimming pools to make sure these are not counted as publicly accessible pools. Thanks!
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-01-18 12:10:08+00:00): Hi! Please add the tag access=private to private swimming pools to make sure these are not counted as publicly accessible pools. Thanks!
Hungerburg (2025-01-18 10:58:52+00:00): Laut dem https://www.bergsteigen.com/touren/klettern/maningkogel-acherkogel-nordostgrat/ ist der SAC T7, osm hat da kein tag dafür
PPete2 (2025-01-18 11:03:16+00:00): Danke, bitte alle Kommentare zu den Wegen am besten auf https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3031672 posten
jpennycook (2025-02-14 15:38:17+00:00): Hi!

Public right of way references should be entered in the prow_ref field, not the name field (which would be used for the actual name that people use to refer to the path/track if there was one)

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:prow_ref
The Local Surveyor (2025-02-14 15:56:27+00:00): Hello,

Thank you for this helpful advice regarding Public Rights of Way. I will try and update the required information as soon as I can get a chance to.

Thanks once again.
mcliquid (2025-01-18 11:40:24+00:00): Hi there, are you sure that the parking lot has a total of 5 spaces and that all 5 of these are for disabled persons only? In other words, non-disabled persons are not allowed to park here at all?
famyfa (2025-01-18 12:03:46+00:00): No sorry it was a missinput i change it today.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-01-18 11:11:10+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/356365574

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/518617951

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
WieKo68 (2025-01-20 19:09:54+00:00): poprawiono
lankapuhelin (2025-05-07 18:08:11+00:00): Eikö tälle waylle sopisi access=no-arvoa paremmin motor_vehicle=private? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/332865989
Daeron (2025-05-12 15:03:52+00:00): Se taisi olla ihan aidatulla (rata)alueella, ainakin kun eteläpäästä katsottuna kävin alkuvuodesta, eli ei päässyt edes kävellen
mueschel (2025-01-19 15:23:56+00:00): Hi,
please check the fuel tags you added, there are two strange ones that are not used anywhere else:
fuel:Gazole
fuel:PGLc
Q-OSM (2025-01-25 10:35:02+00:00): Yes ! Corrected !
NeisBot (2025-01-18 11:10:48+00:00): Hello macss verlan, welcome to OSM, and thank you for your contributions!

I've taken a look at your recent edits and wanted to discuss a few discrepancies I noticed regarding the surrounding environmental features. Specifically, the locations in your edits don't seem to align with the typical geographical characteristics expected in that area. Here are some (max 10) relevant links to the edits:
https://osm.org/node/12512015646

Could you please take a look?
Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#Somewhere
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=161486831
pitscheplatsch (2025-01-18 20:32:05+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161503044
NeisBot (2025-01-18 11:10:53+00:00): Hello macss verlan, welcome to OSM, and thank you for your contributions!

I've taken a look at your recent edits and wanted to discuss a few discrepancies I noticed regarding the surrounding environmental features. Specifically, the locations in your edits don't seem to align with the typical geographical characteristics expected in that area. Here are some (max 10) relevant links to the edits:
https://osm.org/node/12512030312

Could you please take a look?
Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#Somewhere
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=161486847
pitscheplatsch (2025-01-18 20:31:14+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161503044
NorthCrab_upload (2025-01-18 11:21:21+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1352301177

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
adiatmad (2025-01-21 06:36:44+00:00): Hi swanandi sankpal, welcome to OSM!
It looks like you added some large buildings that might not actually be here. Could you please double-check?
---
Feel free to join the OSM India community on Telegram if you haven't yet, and enjoy connecting and learning with the community
>> https://t.me/OSMIndia
---
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161487320
fabzzap (2025-01-26 21:06:58+00:00): Could you please revert the removal of node 12199538086, and restore it being  part of Nonnberggasse? The current route of Nonnberggasse is clearly wrong
Negreheb (2025-04-15 06:37:24+00:00): Servus, warum hast du denn hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/158061817/history amenity=fountain und start_date=1989 gelöscht?
infeeeee (2025-01-19 13:10:04+00:00): Szia! Üdv az OpenStreetMapen!

Bezárt üzleteknél  a disused: prefix használata ajánlott a pont törlése helyett. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused:*

Ez már így volt jelölve, szóval ez felesleges szerkesztés volt. Ha majd megnyílik a szervíz, akkor a pékség adatai helyére be lehet majd írni a szervíz adatait.

Törléskor elveszik az elem története,  és az hasznos információkat is tartalmazhat: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history

Ha kérdésed merülne fel, a magyar szerkesztő közösség elérhetőségeit megtalálod ezen az oldalon: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hungary/Közösség

További jó térképezést!
infeeeee (2025-01-19 13:13:16+00:00): Visszaállítva: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161523854
dvdhoven (2025-01-18 13:51:50+00:00): Het lijkt erop dat jij bij de fietsoversteek Leunisdijk een aantal fietspaden in rcn 66-89 de role backward hebt gegeven.
Mogelijk onder de aanname dat de terugweg als role backward in de route moet worden gezet.
Dat is niet zo.
forward en backward geven de rijrichting aan tov van de tekenrichting van de weg.
In dit specifieke geval heeft zowel de heen- als de terugrichting uitsluitend de role forward. Logisch het zijn eenrichtingwegen, dus je kan alleen in de tekenrichting van de weg rijden.
De heen- en terugrichting zijn alleen te onderscheiden door hun plaats in het relatievenster. Eerst de heenrichting, dan de terugrichting beginnend bij de splitsing van de hoofdrichting en de wegen qua volgorde tegen de rijrichting in met de rollen wel gewoon in de rijrichting.

Vuistregel een eenrichting weg kan nooit de role backward krijgen. Dat kunnen alleen tweerichting wegen.

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
kubahahaha (2025-01-20 07:25:55+00:00): Hej, mogłeś jeszcze uzupełnić inne dane adresowe - i usunąć ten punkt

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10045153705

poprawię to jeżeli nikt mnie nie ubiegnie i nie zapomnę :-)
Marek Szpak (2025-01-20 08:37:37+00:00): Hej, dopiero zaczynam przygodę w edycję map, ale na przyszłość będę pamiętał. Dzięki za informacje.
kubahahaha (2025-01-20 11:11:17+00:00): Jasne, widzę że jesteś od niedawna, dlatego tak podrzucam.
Jak masz ochotę to nie krępuj się poprawić samemu. W razie czego pytaj i dawaj znać gdybysc miał problemy. Pzdr
aceman444 (2025-05-26 07:57:29+00:00): Zdravim, a je to k niecomu dobre, ked po nich uz niet ani stopy?
1Mmarek (2025-05-26 10:16:14+00:00): pridávam iba tie, po ktorých sú stopy - v podobe ciest, ktoré boli na nich vytvorené (a sú podozrivo oblé v štvrti, kde je väčšina ciest rovných) alebo tvarov budov, pozemkov a plotov, ktorých obrysy stále ukazujú polohu tej bývalej vlečky (napr. zahnuté ploty na mieste, kde fakt nevyzerá byť na to dôvod). Tie bývalé vlečky vysvetľujú rôzne javy na mape, preto.
aceman444 (2025-06-07 09:42:38+00:00): Aha, dakujem.
Unknown Registered User (2025-01-20 16:15:22+00:00): I agree with your choice, I was wrong.
*abq* (2025-03-15 09:13:29+00:00): Hallo, 
das sind beschreibende Elemente, die nicht in den name-tag gehören. name-tag sind reine Eigennamen, ohne Beschreibung. 
Von daher bitte nicht mehr revertieren. 
VG Reiner
GUFSZ (2025-01-26 05:22:05+00:00): Weil Vespucci einen alten Changesetkommentar hochgeladen hat, eigentlich habe ich bicycle designated zu yes gemacht.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-05-31 09:53:21+00:00): Removed SEO spam description=* and other tags added to Jeffery Falduto dentist POI in changeset 183434752

https://osm.org/changeset/183434752
NorthCrab_upload (2025-01-18 12:21:38+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Starego Dębu":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12512111862
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12512111863

"Krucza":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12512111875

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
G_P_J (2025-01-19 08:03:09+00:00): Poprawione.
grzegorz75jan (2025-01-18 16:56:45+00:00): Poprawka czego ???
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian

https://youtu.be/xBMIoypkdI4?list=PLTgtPjgzssHzsgAqYbi2QfRoRk1S9ioX5&t=2596
grzegorz75jan (2025-01-18 17:17:44+00:00): Na podstawie zdjęć lotniczych ruszyłeś relacje granic gmin i miejscowości ?
grzegorz75jan (2025-01-18 18:49:23+00:00): Na podstawie zdjęć lotniczych ruszyłeś relacje granic gmin i miejscowości ?
Lothena1685 (2025-01-18 12:25:27+00:00): Forgot to mention why I did it: My navigation always had problems with this roundabout because of the designation.
tux67 (2025-01-18 15:15:23+00:00): Hi Lothena1685,
the reason for the change is a good one - but sounds a lot like "Mapping for the renderer".
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_map_for_the_renderer
Looking at the definition of "optional_sidepath" .. I can not see a separate marked line for bikes. 
So switching bicycle from designated to yes seems to be the right approach.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bicycle%3Doptional_sidepath
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=804084257525842&focus=photo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161489165
NorthCrab_upload (2025-01-18 12:31:42+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/441791321

Pozdrawiam! 🦀