piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Beton Krai (2023-07-25 22:51:32+00:00): Reverted for vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139011066
hdevine825 (2023-07-26 01:05:32+00:00): Reverting mass deletion of name:ru=

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139012695
hdevine825 (2023-07-26 01:02:11+00:00): Reverting mass deletion of name:ru=

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139012649
hdevine825 (2023-07-26 00:44:58+00:00): Reverting mass deletion of name:ru=

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139012422
craxgard (2023-07-25 22:48:54+00:00): Reverted because of vandalism.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139011023
hdevine825 (2023-07-26 00:42:51+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139011017
Jay May (2023-08-12 12:33:26+00:00): I would suggest you, in spite of all, not deleting completely Russian names. Just put them in name:ru.
The "name" tag must be filled with the Kazakh name (if you see a Russian name, just move it to name:ru, and put the Kazakh name there). int_name should be filled with Latin Kazakh (Google Translate can be). 
Each time you are deleting the Russian name, someone (not me) 
reverts your changes. Not very useful
hdevine825 (2023-07-26 00:41:31+00:00): Reverting mass deletion of name:ru=

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139012381
craxgard (2023-07-25 22:49:06+00:00): Reverted because of vandalism.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139011028
jnighan (2023-08-25 15:04:54+00:00): Hi, do signs with these exit numbers actually exist on the ground yet? If not, they should not be in ref=* yet.
Jmapper007 (2023-08-31 02:22:27+00:00): You're right, I believe they are to be built fairly soon but they're not yet. I'll go fix that.
hdevine825 (2023-07-26 00:39:54+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139010979
hdevine825 (2023-07-26 00:39:15+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139010124
opendcc (2023-07-26 05:00:57+00:00): Civilized world dont needs vandalism. Stop this, otherwise you will loose supporters.
Loop120 (2023-07-25 22:19:59+00:00): Although I reverted some of the changesets, I don't have time to revert the rest, so please lend a hand.
hdevine825 (2023-07-26 00:37:32+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139010961
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-07-31 18:59:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 139266891 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some information loss via name changes in the Kurdistan region of Iraq.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7377 and links from there.
tyfi (2023-07-25 22:18:25+00:00): The pavement color changed at the exact same spot as the Arkansas welcome sign, so I used that as the transition between MO NN and AR 181. This does not line up perfectly with the TIGER line, but that's par for the course with TIGER imho.
mueschel (2023-07-29 16:43:31+00:00): Hi,
what is the vehicle you refer to? "escooter" is a very ambiguous term which shouldn't be used in OSM.
There's a proposal for better terms here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:ElectricScooters
If you want to participate, you're very welcome!
NieWnen (2023-07-26 16:48:31+00:00): Ustalcie proszę 1 wersję
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138184960
NieWnen (2023-07-26 16:49:12+00:00): *Co do tego, czy jest to ścieżka rowerowa, czy jednak chodnik.
NieWnen (2023-07-26 16:49:18+00:00): *Co do tego, czy jest to ścieżka rowerowa, czy jednak chodnik.
kartograph (2023-08-12 21:12:01+00:00): Der 186 scheint https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1192200100 jetzt zu überspringen. Übernimmt JOSM die Relationen beim Trennen nicht?
kartograph (2023-08-12 21:13:54+00:00): Hinzugefügt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139802856.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-07-25 22:40:21+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2524079682
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/165026554

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Herman Lee (2023-07-26 14:09:19+00:00): 节点11067852128处似乎没有对应的公交站点，作删除处理
Herman Lee (2023-07-26 14:02:51+00:00): 万狮渡口已经停运拆除，后做删除处理
This ferry has been suspening and will be deleted soon.
ZeLonewolf (2023-08-14 02:03:39+00:00): Hi, the boundary of Kisko seems to be completely broken, are you able to fix this?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/37376
fayor (2023-07-26 13:56:20+00:00): Modifiche arbitrarie in violazione della pagina wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Tag:highway%3Dtrunk e in presenza di discussione in corso sul forum https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/utilizzo-del-tag-highway-trunk-in-italia/101471/34
fayor (2023-07-26 13:56:10+00:00): Modifiche arbitrarie in violazione della pagina wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Tag:highway%3Dtrunk e in presenza di discussione in corso sul forum https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/utilizzo-del-tag-highway-trunk-in-italia/101471/34
fayor (2023-07-26 13:55:59+00:00): Modifiche arbitrarie in violazione della pagina wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Tag:highway%3Dtrunk e in presenza di discussione in corso sul forum https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/utilizzo-del-tag-highway-trunk-in-italia/101471/34
fayor (2023-07-26 13:55:47+00:00): Modifiche arbitrarie in violazione della pagina wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Tag:highway%3Dtrunk e in presenza di discussione in corso sul forum https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/utilizzo-del-tag-highway-trunk-in-italia/101471/34
fayor (2023-07-26 13:55:35+00:00): Modifiche arbitrarie in violazione della pagina wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Tag:highway%3Dtrunk e in presenza di discussione in corso sul forum https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/utilizzo-del-tag-highway-trunk-in-italia/101471/34
MxxCon (2023-07-26 04:40:04+00:00): Hello.
do you have more information about this bar beyond just name, such as address or website or phone number?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139011602
felipeeugenio (2023-07-26 00:01:00+00:00): Hola
Destination es un lugar
destination:street es para las calles
y "Al norte" no es un lugar. por favor corregir y contestar comentarios. mostrar un poco de deferencia con quienes revisamos. Gracias
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139011623
user_11609320 (2023-07-25 23:57:38+00:00): these sub districts are part of the southwest industrial park. I was looking at other edits and it seems that using lines instead of polygons allows for multiple relations. I looked at the wiki and ask for help but never got a response
user_11609320 (2023-07-26 00:10:21+00:00): each sub district has different rules on what is allowed within southwest industrial park
Fizzie-DWG (2023-12-19 16:05:44+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145298096
hrhino (2023-07-26 01:43:05+00:00): hey, are the buildings you deleted near the pub recently gone? I can see them on recent imagery...
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139012526
dkbenjamin (2023-07-26 22:10:39+00:00): I deleted them because they were lines, not polygons. This was part of https://tasks.openstreetmap.us/projects/431/tasks?page=1 so I didn't get around to adding the buildings back in the task. Looks like someone is mapping it now though.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139012526
hrhino (2023-07-26 22:21:17+00:00): Ah, I see, cool... thanks!
Karol_S (2023-09-15 09:55:25+00:00): Cześć, po tej zmianie ciężko przez Nominatim uczelnię wpisując frazę "Uniwersytet Warszawski" (w tej chwili pierwszym wynikiem wyszukiwania jest Akademia Teatralna. To jest kłopotliwe przy korzystaniu z innych stron, które integrują się w wyszukiwarkach miejsc z API Nominatim. Rozważyłbym dodanie do każdego kampusu alt_name=Uniwersystet Warszawski, aby ułatwić wyszukiwanie.
Awoobis (2023-09-15 23:12:16+00:00): Hejo, brakuje name:pl w tagach wydziałów. 
Logika jest taka
Najpierw używa name z języka lokalnego name:pl (którego nie ma), potem fallback name:en (jest), na końcu name.
Awoobis (2023-09-15 23:52:32+00:00): Dodałem brakujące nazwy i ujednoliciłem wykorzystanie skrótu UW w nazwie. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141323267. Co do poprawności rozdzielenia na kampusy i dodanie alt_name nie mam zdania.
Rogoyski (2023-09-16 08:47:39+00:00): Awoobis -> dyskusyjne, To że jakaś apka ma taką kolejność, nie znaczy, że to wszystkich obowiązuje.

Uważam także, że "Uniwersytet Warszawski" powinien być główną nazwą, a nie określenie kampusu. A zatem wcześniejsze rozwiązanie z multipoligonem było słuszniejsze.
Awoobis (2023-09-16 09:31:10+00:00): Dodanie alt_name do relacji kampusu nic nie dało pod względem nominatim
Anas masuris (2023-09-16 14:08:31+00:00): W Krakowie osobno jest oznaczony Kampus 600-lecia Odnowienia Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego - jest to przykład przedstawiony na wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Duniversity (której jak zwykle nikt nie czyta), którego tagowanie jest oznaczone jako poprawne.

Druga sprawa, to to, że jest to nazwa powszechnie używana nawet przez sam Uniwersytet i instytuty badawcze (mapki), które to wynika ze względów historycznych (gospodarka przestrzenna)
Rogoyski (2023-09-16 20:20:49+00:00): Wiki jest w najlepszym razie wewnętrznie sprzeczna, w najgorszym źle odczytałeś (pokrętnie zapisaną) myśl autora. Kolejne zdanie mówi, że to niepoprawne: "This is incorrect if each campus is not[3] a separate university[4]". Zresztą przypis mówiący o kampusie UJ jest właśnie przy tym zdaniu, co może sugerować (?), że autor chciał ten przykład podać jako niepoprawne tagowanie.

Owszem, nazwy kampusów są powszechnie używane, z czego sobie doskonale zdaję sprawę, tylko nie są to nazwy uniwersytetu, a tutaj umieszczane są właśnie na amenity=university. Nie miałbym absolutnie nic przeciwko umieszczeniu ich na jakimś obszarze reprezentującym kampus albo landuse.
Anas masuris (2023-09-18 13:08:59+00:00): Uwaga nr 3 w wiki: "Note that some universities may officially consist of many campuses, but each has separate students, courses and faculty: in this case mapping each campus separately is appropriate". No i dalej "but there is not yet a good alternative as there is no tag for a university campus".

Nie wiem, czy istnieje sposób, aby w relacji multipolygon jeden z obszarów wyświetlał się inaczej (w tym przypadku nie powielając amenity=university)
Rogoyski (2023-09-18 16:43:33+00:00): "Note that some universities may officially consist of many campuses, but each has separate students, courses and faculty: in this case mapping each campus separately is appropriate".

Ta uwaga ewidentnie nie dotyczy tego przypadku. Może dotyczyć PW i jej oddziału zamiejscowego w Płocku albo różnych placówek prywatnej WSB.

"Nie wiem, czy istnieje sposób, aby w relacji multipolygon jeden z obszarów wyświetlał się inaczej (w tym przypadku nie powielając amenity=university)"

Nie znam takiego sposobu, ale kwestionuję, czy jest potrzeba, aby jeden z obszarów miał inny name.
o_andras (2023-07-26 01:24:19+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3791817
Fizzie-DWG (2023-12-19 16:03:46+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145298013
tyfi (2023-07-26 01:29:50+00:00): The shadow is visible in Esri Clarity, and I aligned Clarity to match Bing.
pesticides (2026-03-22 03:27:51+00:00): Do you happen to know if it's still open to people walking and biking? If so, I'd like to change it to highway=path.
jake-low (2026-03-25 05:32:40+00:00): I don't know, sorry. It's been a couple years since this edit but I vaguely recall reading reports that the damaged stretch of road had been completely washed away and was impassible (I assume to hikers too, not just cars). The situation may have changed in the time since though.
tastrax (2023-07-26 03:23:06+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features 

To get the + symbol on a mobile device numeric keypad I reckon you will need to do a LONG press on the zero. (I am on IOS but I think this works)
I have just updated the Community Centre phone number  – Cheers
cserpell (2023-07-27 20:16:27+00:00): Hola, si es que es la dirección de todo el condominio, entonces está bien agregada.
tyfi (2023-07-26 02:39:49+00:00): Latest imagery seems to show oxbow lakes formed in an area previously filled along Old River, as well, so I added those.
GOwin (2023-07-26 23:43:00+00:00): Hello @Zunco☺️ . Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You appear to trying to map something else, but you're tagging them as "camp sites."

Could you elaborate what you're trying to do?

If you're keen to learn more, or get in touch with the local OpenStreetMap community, check out https://osm.org/wiki/PH
citrula (2023-07-26 06:18:30+00:00): Welcome to OSM!
When using iD, you can hold control (or alt on macos) to keep the object you are drawing from 'snapping' to other objects. Also you can press Q with an area selected in order to square the edges and clean things up a bit.
Happy mapping!
felipeeugenio (2023-07-27 18:19:46+00:00): Hola
Por favor detener la inserción de prohibiciones de viraje en U en todas las intersecciones. No tienen mucho sentido, además de no se ni siquiera restricciones implícitas.
adrianojbr (2023-07-26 13:42:46+00:00): Olá, Sebasawk!

Este retorno não existe mais.

Abraço!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139014946
Sebasawk (2023-07-28 07:01:09+00:00): Hi adrianojbr, thank you for your feedback and for correcting the data.
emersonveenstra (2023-07-26 10:51:08+00:00): Hi,

I think you accidentally dragged this node out of place: https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?node=7017012967#map=19/42.91107/-85.55870
ejhmich (2023-07-26 14:29:49+00:00): Yes, I seem to have, thank you!  I've been trying to drag it back and fix it but I keep dragging too much of it.  Is there any way to select just this part of the change set and revert it?  (I'm kind of new here!)
ejhmich (2023-07-26 14:35:00+00:00): Ok I think I have it fixed - uploaded a new change set 139041185
emersonveenstra (2023-07-27 11:18:29+00:00): Looks like you got it, thanks!
Onawis (2023-07-26 13:36:32+00:00): Access tags don't keep people from using.   People see these trails on strava and other mapping apps.   They assume they are public trails and proceed.   People using strava, map there hike or ride and then strava sends the data to open street, thats the problem.
Pt873 (2023-07-26 18:32:24+00:00): Olá, essa região está em obras, por isso foi feita a modificação. Já não há mais as alças para retorno, apenas o cruzamento semafórico.
Ahaggarplateau (2023-07-28 06:28:48+00:00): Hello Pt873, thank you for your insight and for making updates to this feature https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1192242373. Have a nice day. 

Tradução automática
Olá Pt873, obrigado por sua visão e por atualizar este recurso https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1192242373. Tenha um bom dia.
Allison P (2023-07-27 15:54:08+00:00): Just Concord Square, unless the name actually has "Subdivision" in it. I imagine it doesn't.
Jarrardi (2023-07-27 16:06:03+00:00): Im getting my information from the plats they filed with the city, so they're all something like "THE ESTATES AT WET RIVER SUBDIVISION", not even in title case so I can see which words are imports. And they all have "subdivision". But I take your meaning that the sign will probably just read "Estates at Wet River." Thanks!
Jarrardi (2023-07-27 16:10:48+00:00): One further question: Will this cause problems when someone (or more likely, someone in each city in the entire country) invariably names their new subdivision "New York" or "The Washington Monument" or "Mall of America"?
aTarom (2023-07-26 18:09:35+00:00): Hello welcome, thanks for editing,
can you check the addr:street please?
"addr:street"="Дом"
at
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11068212305/history
If you need any help... regards
user_5359 (2023-07-27 17:31:29+00:00): Hello (again)! Please take a look on https://www.osm.org/changeset/139059356. The most of https://www.osm.org/changeset/139059356 comments also fit here.
user_5359 (2023-07-26 07:49:34+00:00): Hello! Please take a look on https://www.osm.org/relation/16129282. What is the mean of the tags
connectivity = 1:1
implicit  = yes
?
Implicit information (common point of the two roads) does not need to be documented again.
pluton_od (2023-07-26 16:59:58+00:00): Hi user_5359,
The `to` way of the relation (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1192245855) has 3 lanes in the turn direction (that is, going south). The Bing imagery shows that the left lane (#1) starts at this intersection and has a solid white line on the right, which is a typical thing for lanes that accept turning traffic; the other two lanes continue from the north. However the white line doesn't continue north (because it's possible to go forward (to the west) from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1192245857). That's why `connectivity=1:1` — you are supposed to turn left from the single lane to the leftmost lane. But there is no explicit sign/road marking to show that, so `implicit=yes`.
To compare, https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16118055 is also `connectivity=1:1`, but not `implicit` because that's a T-shaped intersection and there is a solid white line from north (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/773851523) to south (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/773851521), which you shouldn't cross when turning left.
MaciekMma (2024-10-30 10:32:53+00:00): Uszanowanie, usuneli Ci te stacje trafo SN w okolicach Park Handlowy Karuzela, w tym oto changesecie https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158372846

Tutaj roznicowka https://osmcha.org/changesets/158372846

Stacja trafo nadal istnieje (sprawdzalem), autor nie odpowaida na komentarze.
BCNorwich (2023-07-27 08:40:52+00:00): Hi, I've removed the duplicated sections of the highways you somehow added.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2023-07-27 08:36:05+00:00): Hi, I've removed the duplicated sections of the highways you somehow added.

Regards Bernard.
Kovoschiz (2023-07-27 10:08:19+00:00): 1. Please use `addr:full=` for the full address if you don't know how to split it. 
2. Please don't add fake `addr:postcode=` when HK doesn't have it.
Mirecnet (2023-09-23 12:45:16+00:00): Nazdar,
vsimol som si, ze si zrusil zakaz vjazdu do Sestrcskej doliny popod Sastrc a Pravnac do Malatinej. 
Preco?
BCNorwich (2023-07-27 08:35:36+00:00): Hi, I've removed the duplicated sections of the highways you somehow added.

Regards Bernard.
ovruni (2023-07-26 07:50:01+00:00): Hola, en varios de sus conjuntos de cambios se han agregado etiquetas layer ficticias, esto se debe a que posiblemente no se están alineando las calles al agregar un edificio y se este seleccionando opciones de "poner mas alto" o "poner mas bajo". Estas opciones se tiene que colocar en casos como cuando un puente se encuentra sobre un río, pero no para el caso de edificios con carreteras.
Saaludos
BCNorwich (2023-07-27 08:35:56+00:00): Hi, I've removed the duplicated sections of the highways you somehow added.

Regards Bernard.
ovruni (2023-07-26 07:50:33+00:00): Hola, la vía que se colocado como edificio es la cancha del colegio.
Saludos
Stukeil (2023-08-13 07:33:45+00:00): Veo que se estan mapeando algunos arboles, es un proyecto que se planea continuar o solo pruebas?
user_17222985 (2023-07-28 06:54:21+00:00): cleaning the streets from name:ru was the right decision
name:ru and the Russian language itself is Russian shit, Ukraine must be cleansed of it.
you made a fool of yourself by polluting Ukrainian streets with Russian
user_5359 (2023-07-28 07:23:20+00:00): OSM is not a platform for political discussion. We have very few rules about what should not be collected. 

If people in Ukraine have pain to see the Russian language on their objects, I recommend to create a data export and delete the Russian names there. On the general visible standard maps of Ukraine they are not shown as far as I know.

Therefore, regardless of my personal opinion about the war and its perpetrators, the action is unacceptable.
eggie (2023-07-26 07:42:33+00:00): Beste Koen,

Wat is je bedoeling? Laat het even weten.  Hier is wel Natuurcamping Olde Kottink, maar geen Molenallee.  Ik haal je vermelding weg.
De tagging klopt met amenity=Molenallee ook niet. 

MVG
eggie
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-07-26 06:43:01+00:00): see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/77171318 - user ignored already question about other tag
Frans S (2023-08-21 10:33:08+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
The industrial building here  is very poor mapped. You can do better than that.
Did you add a layer to it to hide an error? Never seen a building above ground level. 
Best regards and keep mapping
user_17222985 (2023-08-11 15:50:02+00:00): You are a cartographer from another country
it is wrong when you interfere in the affairs of another country

Many Ukrainian mappers against name:ru in the streets. In the Ukrainian community, the discussion is not over yet
user_5359 (2023-08-11 16:01:25+00:00): OSM is not a platform for political discussion. We have very few rules about what should not be collected.
If people in Ukraine have pain to see the Russian language on their objects, I recommend to create a data export and delete the Russian names there. On the general visible standard maps of Ukraine they are not shown as far as I know.
Therefore, regardless of my personal opinion about the war and its perpetrators, the action is unacceptable.
ququruzka (2023-08-03 16:36:33+00:00): plaease, clarify your changset.
Your changes have broken name=* and name:uk=* matching. 
Please, revert your changes or fix all broken names.
Thanks.
user_5359 (2023-08-03 17:38:39+00:00): Hello ququruzka, I reverted only the deleting of name:uk. If there any additional problems, please check the history of the data.
jacobwhall (2023-07-26 06:59:33+00:00): Data collected with a Bad Elf GNSS Surveyor kindly loaned to me by the W&M Center for Geospatial Analysis. Please see here for the raw trace: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/jacobwhall/traces/8952276
user_11609320 (2023-07-26 06:55:16+00:00): no fix route, dial a ride community wide
eggie (2023-07-26 07:52:41+00:00): Hi dz,

added amenity = parking and service=parking_aisle..

Greetz,
eggie
dz_shpironak (2023-07-26 14:12:55+00:00): Hello.
Thank to your edits.
HellMap (2023-07-26 10:01:52+00:00): Hi!

Please use the driveway preset `highway=service` + `service=driveway` when adding roads that go to individual properties, rather than `highway=unclassified`, which is a generic public road.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Ddriveway

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lv:Latvian_tagging_guidelines#Piebraukšanas_ceļi_lauku_sētām

Thanks
lefuturiste (2023-09-14 05:32:52+00:00): Bonjour, veuillez revoir vos changements, ceci ne sont pas tous valides pour OSM. Par exemple le nom du village écrit en majuscule est interdit, veuillez l'écrire comme les autres Svp.
osmviborg (2023-07-26 07:31:42+00:00): Vejen er meget synlig på luftfoto fra april i år.
petsen (2023-07-26 08:26:41+00:00): Korrekt, men jeg cyklede forbi i går aftes og der var den ikke synlig :-)
osmviborg (2023-07-26 08:31:36+00:00): OK, jeg har genskabt vejen, men tagget den som'removed:highway=yes', så er der ikke andre der gentegner vejen.
petsen (2023-07-26 08:36:35+00:00): Hov, det var en smart måde at gøde det på :-)