piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
BrummsLee (2026-01-30 12:12:47+00:00): Hallo Oberlausitzer!
Sei bitte so gut und laß die Bearbeitungen so, wie sie waren oder kommuniziere mit uns!
Man hängt nicht an jedes Gebäude die gleiche Adresse. Die Adresse ist schon an der Gesamtfläche des Wilhelmshofes dran.
Bei dem Saal hatte ich im Netz gelesen, daß es eine Kirche wäre. Deswegen auch building=church. Scheint wohl nicht so zu sein...?
Abgewöhnen solltest du dir bitte, beschreibende Bezeichnungen, wie "Bauernmuseum mit Freifläche" oder "Wilhelmshof Saal" als Namen einzutragen!
(Hab jetzt aber mal nur die Bezeichnung "Bauernmuseum" als Name drin gelassen. 😉)
In den Schlüsselwert Name kommen nur Eigennamen, wie z. Bsp. das Denkmal: "Herbert Balzer" oder auch die Kita "Sonnenhügel".
Und bitte gewöhne dir ab, laufend irgendwelche Wege zu löschen und neu zu erfassen! Damit zerstörst du die ganze History. Das wird hier nicht gern gesehen!!! Gruß
H_S (2026-02-05 16:54:38+00:00): El mástil para el árbol de Navidad sigue existiendo. 
Saludos desde Barranquilla 
Heinz
rempshaener (2026-01-25 08:34:00+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.
Du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Ich habe nur zwei Anmerkungen:
- Das für „Feuerwehr“ maßgebliche amenity=fire_station hängt jetzt am Gebäude. Wo es möglich ist, sollte eine Linie um das Gelände gezogen werden und fast alles an Informationen (auch die Adresse) an das Gelände umziehen. Am Gebäude selbst verbleibt dann nur building=fire_station.
- Der operator:type=community ist nicht ganz richtig. Da der operator (Träger) die Kommune ist, kann diese nicht „community“ sein. Die Abgrenzung haupt-/ehrenamtlich erfolgt hier per fire_station:type=voluntary.
Vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag und weiterhin viel Spaß beim Mappen.
Viele Grüße
NeisBot (2026-01-25 07:23:16+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 13 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/998105994 v3 | 13 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177662056
pitscheplatsch (2026-01-25 07:34:10+00:00): In this case, it seems the reported issues are false positives. The geometries were not changed in a way that would introduce crossings, and the tagging adjustments did not create any new conflicts.

Sorry for the inconvenience, and thanks again for your map edits.

Regards,
Pascal
Maryna Makarava (2026-01-27 11:18:36+00:00): Hi, Agingi!
There is a duplicate road at this location (w1470121288). Could you please remove the extra one?
Best regards, Marina.
agingi (2026-02-13 10:18:32+00:00): Hi, thank you for noticing. Apologies for the late reply. 
Fixed!

Kind regards
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-03 19:42:53+00:00): Hello!

You used
healthcare=hospital.
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13482552611/history

Have you maybe meant
healthcare=hospital
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
DrWho (2026-02-03 20:08:37+00:00): „Physiotherapie Boeder“ is a practice for physiotherapy.
I don‘t know the correct classification.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-12 08:45:14+00:00): So that is a single doctor, not entire hospital?

Or is it shared practice of multiple doctors?
DrWho (2026-02-12 09:27:25+00:00): A physiotherapy practice provides physical therapy services to help patients recover from injuries, manage pain, and improve mobility. Therapists use hands-on techniques like massage, exercise programs, and specialized treatments such as manual therapy or electrotherapy.

Doctors are not required to work in a physiotherapy practice. These practices are run independently by qualified physiotherapists who provide treatments like physical therapy, massage, and exercise programs.
Norbert Dichter (2026-01-24 22:16:30+00:00): Hello, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. Thank you for your contribution. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. Or just hit the Q-key.
Also please keep in mind: many buildings are very close but do not actually touch each other, try to map them close to each other without letting them connect or share nodes with each other, roads, or residential area outlines. In the iD web editor, holding down the "alt" key will keep nodes from "snapping" to each other and accidentally connecting.  Thanks so much for your contribution, Norbert 'Nodi' Dichter, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177662752
Poprawiłem (2026-01-30 09:39:21+00:00): primary source: survey
mga_geo (2026-01-26 07:03:49+00:00): Bonjour,
Pourquoi avoir modifié l'attribut "network" ?
Les réseaux départementaux sont toujours gérés séparément et  la valeur BREIZHGO_CAR_29 était correcte.
Je vous laisse corriger ?
Marc
LERTC (2026-01-24 22:42:45+00:00): surveyed
eggie (2026-01-25 09:01:03+00:00): Welkom bij OSM,
De postcode was niet eenduidig. Ik heb deze aangepast.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=177663397
MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-01-25 09:22:22+00:00): Dag Alinda . Je vraagt feedback.
Niet alle parkeerstroken zijn perpendicular.. (kops parkeren)
Ze kunnen ook diagonal zijn of parallel.
Een leisure=park is een groot gebied dat als een transparante deken over bomen, water en gras ligt. Dus niet een klein stukje gras.
leisure=park is de functie. De landuse is wat je ziet.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-01-25 09:24:27+00:00): Het park heb ik omgezet naar highway=pedestrian area=yes
De parkeerstroken kun je nog aanpassen. Dan ook de nodes met parkeerplaats verwijderen anders alles dubbel.

MVG
eggie
adjuva (2026-01-25 01:51:48+00:00): Hallo!
Du hast in diesem Änderungsatz drei von vier Platform-Nodes an der Kenndyallee um 265 m nach Süden verschoben. Ebenso diverse Nodes im Umfeld von Bad Godesberg-Bahnhof. Und alle Nodes, die ich sonst noch überprüft habe. 
Bitte den ganzen Änderungssatz reverten.
Schö Adjuva
bernward1 (2026-01-25 09:24:47+00:00): Vielen Dank für den Hinweis.
Das war nicht beabsichtigt.
Ich habe die Änderungen rückgängig gemacht
adjuva (2026-01-25 14:00:19+00:00): Vielen Danke für die schnelle Reaktion. Sieht gut aus und meine Konflikte konnte ich einfach lösen. Alles ok.
felipeeugenio (2026-01-25 11:33:12+00:00): Hello.

sure? Water in river al rarely drinkable.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177663771
Elijahh (2026-01-25 22:14:41+00:00): Yes, there is water coming from a tap which is supposed to be drinking water according to CONAF rangers.
felipeeugenio (2026-01-26 11:47:28+00:00): really? ok then. I thought it was a mistake.

regards
eggie (2026-01-25 09:16:37+00:00): Dag JvanDuin,

Gebruikelijk is om building=shed te gebruiken voor schuurtjes ipv barn.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dbarn

MVG
eggie
JvanDuin (2026-01-25 09:23:00+00:00): Hallo eggie, dank voor de feedback. Ik heb de edit in een naar het NL vertaalde app gedaan waardoor het woord "schuur" blijkbaar is vertaald naar "barn" in plaats van "shed". Ik ga het proberen te herstellen.
JvanDuin (2026-01-25 09:26:08+00:00): Ah, ik zie dat jij dat al gedaan hebt.
eggie (2026-01-25 09:26:48+00:00): Hoi,

Die schuurtjes heb ik net omgezet,
Met mijn editor gaat dat in 1x
eggie (2026-01-25 09:27:18+00:00): Je zou nog even kunnen checken
JvanDuin (2026-01-25 09:30:27+00:00): Ik heb het gezien, bedankt! Ik heb gelijk de rest van de schuurtjes in de straat ook gedaan.

Groet,
Jan
LordGarySugar (2026-01-27 23:31:09+00:00): Hey there, thanks for your contributions to OSM! Ideally, when mapping houses, you should draw one polygon/area per property, so for example two semidetached houses should be represented by two connected building=semidetached_house areas. If you go into Background Settings in iD, you can enable 'OSMUK Cadastral Parcels', which will highlight most property boundaries and should help show where buildings should be divided. If you have any questions, feel free to ask, thanks! Happy mapping!
stevanbarry (2026-02-01 15:11:07+00:00): Thanks I'm aware of this feature and have contributed many times previously splitting terraced and semi detached. My main aim first with Maesteg is to get all urban areas listed with more refinements in other changesets.
danieldegroot2 (2026-01-27 22:04:35+00:00): Hey / Ahoj Dvorný a Vojtěch Fošnár,

For reference / Tyto odkazy zde zveřejňuji jako reference pro ostatní uživatele.

- Documentation / Stránka s dokumentací

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Drobn%C3%A9_pam%C3%A1tky_Import

- User profiles

Dvorný
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Dvorn%C3%BD

Vojtěch Fošnár
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Vojt%C4%9Bch%20Fo%C5%A1n%C3%A1r

- Discussion / Diskuse s komunitou

Matrix
https://matrix.to/#/!DjtOqdPZoxZMJpyRJK:matrix.org/$57WiS7WROrJ5cWbM3gTk1kgpTHtO61o3DXQEhTwOFqM?via=matrix.org&via=mxchat.cz&via=tchncs.de

Mailing list
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-cz/2026-January/thread.html#28272
(or: https://openstreetmap.cz/talkcz/c4406 )

Tyto odkazy prosím vložte přímo na wiki stránku pro tento import.

Může být užitečné ručně vypsat soubory změn, kterých se to týká.

Zvažte použití importního účtu (účtů) pro budoucí importy.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines#Using_a_Dedicated_User_Account_for_Imports

(EN);

Please include these links directly on the wiki page for this import.

It may be useful to manually list the changesets which were involved.

Consider using import account(s) for future imports. (see link above)
eggie (2026-01-25 09:03:58+00:00): Dag GeoMik.. Je info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode.
MVG
eggie
Ltrlg (2026-01-26 09:42:44+00:00): Pour info : changeset/177712454.
vng_me (2026-01-25 12:44:35+00:00): Please, read the OSM wiki about natural=coastline tag. It is incorrect to use it in the way you did in this changeset.
Anatoliy (2026-01-25 20:42:46+00:00): should it be natural=water?
JeroenHoek (2026-01-25 16:36:24+00:00): De naam van de fysieke perrons van het busstation in Heerenveen zijn niet 'Busstation' (net zo min als een perron van een treinstation de naam van het station draagt).
A67-A67 (2026-01-25 20:07:39+00:00): In principe voegen we de naam van de halte toe aan de haltes (bus_stop-nodes en perrons). Dat doen we in heel Nederland, dus waarom niet in Heerenveen?
A67-A67 (2026-01-25 20:08:45+00:00): Daarnaast is local_ref de algemeen ondersteunde tag voor perronletters. Deze wordt ook gebruikt Organic Maps / Comaps en de Transport-laag op osm.org. Graag deze tag niet verwijderen!
JeroenHoek (2026-01-25 20:21:01+00:00): Wat is er mis met ref? Die gebruiken we op alle perrons samen met name (waar name en ref samen vallen).
JeroenHoek (2026-01-25 20:22:00+00:00): We voegen op geen enkel treinstation de naam van het station aan het perron toe, waarom wel op een busstation?
JeroenHoek (2026-01-25 20:24:07+00:00): Je hebt gelijk over local_ref trouwens. Misschien is het handiger om daar landelijk een edit mee te doen na een forumvoorstel, want zo'n beetje elk treinperron gebruikt ref.
JeroenHoek (2026-01-25 20:28:35+00:00): Als je de perrons wil groeperen onder de haltenaam, stop ze dan in een relatie (public_transport=stop_area). Dat staat wat onduidelijk ook bij de name=* vermeldt op de wiki voor public_transport=platform.

Voor de rest hoort die naam eerder bij de bus_stop node dan bij het perron, net als bij het spoor.
A67-A67 (2026-01-25 20:36:47+00:00): De stop-area-relatie bestaat hier al. Dat hoeft dus niet meer te gebeuren.

Wat betreft de naam van de perrons wordt het redelijk wisselend toegepast in Nederland. Soms wordt de halteletter gekopieerd naar de name-tag, soms met perron ervoor, soms is het de haltenaam. Voor meerdere gevallen is wat te zeggen. Als het perron geen 'Busstation' heet, heet het ook geen 'B'.

Wat betreft de local_ref. Deze gebruik ik nu naast ref, om in ieder geval backward compatibility te houden. Ook is deze tag in JOSM wat beter zichtbaar te maken. Maar dubbele dataopslag kan ook tot inconsistenties leiden. Op een gegeven moment zouden de ref-tags moeten verdwijnen.
pwbriggs (2026-01-26 17:49:39+00:00): Very unlikely that there's a camera at the center of this intersection, though I do see some cameras on a streetlight on the south side of this intersection. They look like normal city traffic or surveillance cameras though, I don't recognize them as Flock. Please don't tag cameras as manufactured by Flock unless you're sure.

I'm removing this camera for now, let me know if you have more details about which camera you're intending to map and I can correct the location and information.
CurlingMan13 (2026-01-25 00:42:32+00:00): Please just update the node that is already there.  Please don't create a new node and then leave a note on the old one.  It creates confusion.  The new node for Teriyaki Madness has been removed and readded correctly.
pwbriggs (2026-01-26 17:44:15+00:00): A camera wouldn't be placed at the very center of the intersection (and it seems extremely unlikely that there would be a camera manufactured by Flock Safety in this area). Are you referring to the nearby emergency phone and camera (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11924024811)? Or just a regular City of Seattle traffic camera? Please provide more details so we can get this added accurately.
NeisBot (2026-01-25 07:25:30+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/1470150845 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Community gardens"
---
Par exemple, une version plus neutre et factuelle de ton texte pourrait être : « les jardins communautaires »
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-02 07:01:51+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177992932
(No visible changes after review)
StreetSurveyor (2026-03-31 00:29:51+00:00): This edit is incorrect. I have personally surveyed these roads and verified the layout using the town GIS. “Old Maple St” is only signed indicating the turn from Maple Street (MA 62) to where Kirkbride Dr is located—it is not a distinct, addressable street. All properties in this area are addressed as Maple St.

Please rely on verifiable sources such as official signage or municipal GIS data, and avoid making unsupported or arbitrary changes.
NeisBot (2026-01-25 07:25:33+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13482840996 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Marcenaria"
---
Por exemplo, uma versão mais neutra e factual do seu texto poderia ser: "Marcenaria"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-02-02 07:01:52+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/177909884
ivanbranco (2026-01-25 21:08:24+00:00): Ciao servilius_ahala,

il tag name=* si utilizza solo per i nomi propri. "tomba romana" mi sembra più una descrizione, in tal caso si deve utilizzare il tag "description".
skorasaurus (2026-05-25 22:04:44+00:00): thanks for the add.
FajrAl (2026-03-01 07:52:49+00:00): Changeset ini saya revert. Mari diskusi dengan komunitas OSM Indonesia mengenai tagging yang sesuai.
JJIglesias (2026-01-25 16:46:11+00:00): Saludos. Gracias por agregar esos segmentos nuevos de vias. Es muy importante que estos segmentos sean clasificados adecuadamente, ya q no entran en highway=unclassified sino en highway=track. Una mala clasificación impacta directamente a los navegadores q usan data OSM, pues unclassified es manejado equivalentemente a highway=residential, y estas vias que agregas no son tales. Te sugiero que consultes la Wiki al respecto.
JJIglesias (2026-01-25 18:39:36+00:00): Por cierto y dado que te dedicas bastante a Chuquisaca, te sugiero revisar la zona de Azurduy, hay toda un red de caminos y tracks que NO están en el mapa. Gracias
mcliquid (2026-02-01 12:32:51+00:00): Hello Enock4seth, thank you for your edits.

A quick note about this changeset: it includes multipolygon fixes spread over a very wide area — from Poland to Ghana. Even though the edit type is consistent (removing tags from members with role = inner), combining such distant locations into a single changeset makes review and possible reverts difficult for other mappers.

For future work, please consider:

keeping each changeset geographically limited (e.g. one country or region),

uploading before moving on to a distant area,

splitting large-scale cleanup work into multiple, clearly scoped changesets.

More information can be found here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering this, and happy mapping!
Enock4seth (2026-02-02 08:07:51+00:00): Hello mcliquid, thank you for commenting, you can see the changeset was reverted => https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177668950

This was changeset occurred to due a typo from me, missing out the first digit "1" in the way ID. It should have been https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1356366099 instead of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/356366099

Happy mapping!
hatul (2026-01-25 11:37:30+00:00): אתה בטוח שהדרך הזו לא קיימת? רצתי שם לפני כמה שנים ואז הוספתי אותה.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/422147985/history
Maki869 (2026-01-25 11:49:29+00:00): לא רק שאני בטוח - ניסינו אתמול לעבור שם ואין שם כלום מלבד יער ודשא .
אין זכר למשהו שדומה לשביל .
מוזמן להציץ לרכיבה ואיך שיצאנו משם 
https://strava.app.link/uvJRdPOpd0b
hatul (2026-01-25 16:58:06+00:00): הבנתי, לא מחקת את הדרך שאני הוספתי אלא שביל אחר.
למרות שבהשוואה בין המסלול שלכם למפת החום אני לא בטוח שהייתם על השביל.
https://i.imgur.com/IZsiglW.jpeg
Maki869 (2026-01-25 17:00:00+00:00): כי לא היה שום שביל
SafwatHalaby (2026-01-28 13:59:58+00:00): בתמונות הלווין רואים קו כלשהו בין העצים. אולי היה שם שביל פעם והיום הוא מאוד שחוק.

ממה שראית, האם לדעתך מתאים לתייג את זה כשביל רגלי או אפילו "שביל לא פורמלי?", או שגם את זה לא רואים?

שביל לא פורמלי הוא שביל שנוצר מדריכות רגלי בני אדם ורואים אותו בבירור: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:informal%3Dyes
Maki869 (2026-01-28 14:06:02+00:00): אני מעוד מעדיף את ההשקעה שלך להוכיח משהו שלא קיים !
אמר מדבר על מה שרואים במפה 
ואני אומר שאני הייתי שם עם עוד אדם ואין כלום בשטח , לא שביל נעלם ולא שבחר שבור - אין כלום !
literan (2026-01-25 10:04:19+00:00): обычно тротуары вдоль дворовых проездов отдельно не рисуют
literan (2026-01-25 10:02:27+00:00): точку подземника утащили на здание. Аккуратнее, пожалуйста. Исправлю.
WaffleR_zero (2026-01-29 11:04:03+00:00): Hello, this changeset comment is very inappropriate.
pepsi_max2k (2026-01-30 11:13:29+00:00): Unless they've all been reopened, many of the cycle/alleyways between streets in north darwin have been shut/sold off/demolished. If you're going simply off aerials for these, they're wrong, and at the very least need access changing and gates adding (I did this for pretty much all of them a year ago; they've all reappeared :( ).
MAG_OSM (2026-01-30 23:47:57+00:00): You've got a point. I'll need to physically go over to some of these before I actually add them from now on. 

Most of the ones closer to me are opened on a schedule rather than outright closed, but I do know of some that are permanently closed.
pepsi_max2k (2026-01-30 23:58:08+00:00): No worries - I've fixed a couple in Wagaman and the one I know in Karama. From memory there were quite a few over north Darwin that were perma shut (eg. I think lee point rd > shackle st > maude st might be closed, will check later though). In general any you had to add from scratch are probably not in use as I removed loads last year. In hindsight maybe I should just leave the line there with a note.
waldyrious (2026-01-25 09:25:30+00:00): For future reference, the note mentioned in the changeset comment is https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4030552.
Fraxi (2026-01-25 09:14:53+00:00): Информацията за локациите на някои площадки откъде е...?
Anonymous36863 (2026-01-25 11:57:12+00:00): Bulgaria MAF Orthophoto
Fraxi (2026-01-25 12:10:06+00:00): Добре, Вие кого баламосвате? Значи, не мога да приема, че освен по тези площадки в Люлин, които може да сте видял на живо и оттам да сте видял името на производителя, от спътниковите снимки едва ли не, сте видял че и тази площадки в парк Гео Милев е към същата фирма...
Fraxi (2026-01-25 12:11:18+00:00): Ако обичате, тези площадки, които не сте ги видели на живо или за които не сте почерпили информация от легален(по стандартите на OSM) източник, ги изтрийте.
Fraxi (2026-01-25 12:12:39+00:00): От спътник ли видяхте такива детайли за https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1300168905. Айде, моля Ви се... Извинявайте за тона, но Вие прекалявате. Колко пъти и други потребители Ви предупреждаваха, обясняваха...
Anonymous36863 (2026-01-25 12:27:10+00:00): Направих малко предположения, защото си приличат, но информацията не е от Google Maps. Ако има нещо грешно, можете да изтриете информацията. Но няма да отговоря пак на такъв тон.
Fraxi (2026-01-25 12:34:01+00:00): Така или иначе, ако е на база предположения, поне можете да напишете fixme. Защото ако се окаже, че площадката не е с такива данни и не е от този производител, информацията вярна ли е? Ако искате, отговаряйте, но когато се използват източници със защитени авторски права, proprietary и т.н., от това може целият проект OSM да претърпи последици. И правни, и върху престижа. Всичко е обяснено в уикито защо е така.
SD Mapman (2026-01-26 16:35:14+00:00): What does the relation type "superroute" accomplish?
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-01-26 17:20:00+00:00): "Superroute" allows you to group together the components of a route. For example: A superroute containing I-15 northbound and I-15 southbound.
SD Mapman (2026-01-27 16:16:47+00:00): Interesting! This might be better than the generic "type=route" currently in use on pretty much all the rest of these multi-state road routes. I started a forum post to see if there can be consensus to do this nationwide.

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/superroute-type-for-multi-state-road-routes/141062
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-01-27 17:25:05+00:00): I mostly began doing this in California, Nevada, and Arizona since that's my "local" edit area. (I-15 goes through all three, which is how I ended up in Montana.) I'm not sure what the consensus is nationwide, but since the few instances where I have done it haven't received any pushback AFAIK, I assumed that it wouldn't be controversial.
eggie (2026-01-25 09:01:45+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
hatul (2026-07-01 08:52:21+00:00): שלום צור
למה שינית את שם השמורה?
השם הרשמי הוא כמו שייבאתי „שמורת טבע חמרת רמת הכובש”. 
https://www.nevo.co.il/law_html/law00/212168.htm