piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Anas masuris (2026-07-29 18:57:48+00:00): W Ig-10 masz przykład z Siedlec, gdzie tory biegnące w stronę Kotunia mają dodatkowo literę "K"
Dawid2849 (2026-07-29 19:24:53+00:00): A od czego jest "U" na wschodzie w kierunku Chełma?
Anas masuris (2026-07-29 19:28:41+00:00): Uherka, ale musiało mi się coś powalić, bo jest jeszcze Zawadówka po drodze
Dawid2849 (2026-07-29 19:29:25+00:00): No właśnie dlatego mi coś nie pasowało :P
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-28 19:36:07+00:00): NB, it seems you've used a variety of (incorrect) phone number formats in your changesets. The standard format for NANP (e.g. US) phone numbers on OSM is +1-NNN-NNN-NNNN rather than the +1 NNN NNN NNNN used in most other countries. See https://osm.wiki/phone=*#United_States
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186485663
DressyPear4 (2026-07-28 12:57:58+00:00): Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/186517913
DressyPear4 (2026-07-28 12:57:57+00:00): Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/186517913
DressyPear4 (2026-07-28 12:57:55+00:00): Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/186517913
McKulkin (2026-07-27 22:36:29+00:00): no need for extra clarification because they're already in the boundaries of Birtvisi
DressyPear4 (2026-07-28 12:57:54+00:00): Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/186517913
DressyPear4 (2026-07-28 12:55:04+00:00): Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/186517742
DressyPear4 (2026-07-28 12:55:03+00:00): Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/186517742
DressyPear4 (2026-07-28 12:55:02+00:00): Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/186517742
DressyPear4 (2026-07-28 12:55:00+00:00): Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/186517742
DressyPear4 (2026-07-28 12:54:59+00:00): Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/186517742
DressyPear4 (2026-07-28 12:54:58+00:00): Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/186517742
Wildsharky (2026-07-29 07:03:49+00:00): Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186514481
DressyPear4 (2026-07-28 12:54:56+00:00): Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/186517742
DressyPear4 (2026-07-28 12:54:55+00:00): Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/186517742
DressyPear4 (2026-07-28 12:54:53+00:00): Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/186517742
ftrebien (2026-07-28 17:08:39+00:00): Vandalismo. Sinalização de 60 km/h (como mapeado antes) nos dois sentidos no trecho editado, não 80 km/h.
arcizy (2026-07-28 00:36:32+00:00): Nah anda ini bukan warga lokal, anda membuat jalan yg menghubungkan jalan irigasi bendasari ke jalan bypass tanjungpura. Udah bener ada yg menghapus jalan ini. Malah dibikin lagi kocak. Jalan ini ditutup karena ada kecelakaan truk kontainer terguling. Lalu ditutup road barrier
arcizy (2026-07-28 00:41:03+00:00): Anda hanya mengandalkan citra satelit tanpa bertanya dulu ke warga lokal. Di aplikasi maxim jalan ini sudah hilang. Anda malah membuat jalan ini lagi.
FajrAl (2026-07-28 00:46:23+00:00): Sudah ditambahkan tag akses. Penghapusan jalan itu dilakukan bila jalannya sudah hilang. Saat ini baru dihalangi barrier / penghalang yang bisa saja di masa depan akan dihilangkan.

Aplikasi ojol bisa baca tag akses.
arcizy (2026-07-28 00:50:33+00:00): Gini ya, di maxim itu jalan hanya terlihat seperti jalan biasa. Kalau tanpa navigasi maka org akan menganggap jalan itu ada dan bisa dilewati. Sekarang bayangkan druver dari johar mau ke perum griya mas lestari melihat ada jalan itu, maka dia akan lewat sana, eh ga taunya ditutup. Anda berdosa telah menyesatkan org lain. Gitu aja sih
arcizy (2026-07-28 00:51:54+00:00): Jgn menyulitkan org lain bro, kalau emg tidak bisa dilewati ya sudah hapus, kasian.. anda instal dulu deh maxim, liat aktual peta nya gimana. Jalan itu terlihat seperti jalan biasa
FajrAl (2026-07-28 00:55:15+00:00): Daripada memperpanjang diskusi di sini, sebaiknya kita melanjutkannya di grup Telegram Komunitas OpenStreetMap Indonesia.
https://t.me/osmindonesia
arcizy (2026-07-28 00:56:44+00:00): Dishub karawang kalau udah pasang barrier, sudah tidak mungkin dibuka lagi, ada jalan yg sampe 10 tahun ga pernah dibuka lagi. Nih ya saran saya hapus dulu, kalau memang dibuka lagi, yg menurut saya mustahil, ya tinggal bikin jalan lagi
NaufalFarras (2026-07-28 02:02:52+00:00): Tidak seperti itu caranya. Jalan yang tidak bisa dilalui masih bisa dinyatakan melalui tag. Tag tersebut bisa digunakan dalam algoritma navigasi untuk tidak mengarahkan pengguna ke sana dan rendering untuk menggambarkan garis putus-putus yang menyatakan jalan tidak bisa dilalui. Menghapus jalan juga berarti menghapus data dan riwayat suntingannya, oleh karena itu hal ini menjadi opsi terakhir.
FajrAl (2026-07-28 02:13:23+00:00): Sudah dihapus kembali oleh dia https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186490933
arcizy (2026-07-28 02:43:09+00:00): Ngebet banget anda ya, definisi jalan adalah prasarana transportasi darat yg bisa dilalui kendaraan, manusia, lah kalau udah ga bisa dilalui manusia apa masih layak disebut jalan?  Itu cuma tanah terbengkalai
arcizy (2026-07-28 02:51:33+00:00): Pemerintah menutup dengan road barrier itu memang berniat menghilangkan akses tersebut, agar tidak terjadi kecelakaan lagi dan tidak terjadi kemacetan. Saya gabung kesini krn bnyk keluhan driver maxim terkait jalan pintas dari jalan interchange menuju irigasi bendasari. Kami yg memakai aplikasi untuk daerah ini, koq jadi kalian yg ribet, org lokal aja bukan
FajrAl (2026-07-28 02:51:51+00:00): Pendapat Anda seharusnya diterapkan juga pada https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186493313 dengan menghapus jalannya, bukan menggantinya dengan barrier=guard_rail ;)
arcizy (2026-07-28 02:57:52+00:00): Bedakan bentuknya, yg saya ubah menjadi barrier itu u-turn. Sedangkan ini kalau ditutup masih bisa disebut tanah kosong
arcizy (2026-07-28 03:06:44+00:00): Alasan kedua karena dari view map original di aplikasi maxim tidak terlihat ada u-turn tersebut, kecuali di zoom maksimal. Beda dengan jalan ini yg terlihat seperti jalan biasa
arcizy (2026-07-28 03:18:06+00:00): Tapi memang benar harus dihapus sih, soalnya sebelum summarecon juga ada u-turn yg ditutup(kondisi real) tapi di map tidak ada.
DressyPear4 (2026-07-28 12:54:52+00:00): Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/186517742
ftrebien (2026-07-28 17:07:10+00:00): Vandalismo. Trecho com lombadas e sinalização indicando limite de 30 km/h, como estava mapeado antes, não 80 km/h.
dzamper (2026-07-31 05:51:02+00:00): Znowu niepoprawnie przesunąłeś https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1503722271 mimo że https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/544271261 ma tag placement=middle_of:1

Polecam JOSM i Styl rysowania „Lanes and road attributes”
FDMS4 (2026-07-29 10:59:34+00:00): Rein aus Neugierde, woher hast du den Farbcode? Die WL (Onlinenetzpläne, WienMobil Web, …) verwenden normalerweise #0A295D :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186488003
hlfan (2026-07-29 12:31:45+00:00): Da musst du gnlpfth fragen, wegen dem bissl helleren Blau in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186328967 wollte ich selber nicht so einen Wirbel machen.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186488003
FDMS4 (2026-07-29 12:57:45+00:00): Ah, sehe gerade Strab ist etwas stärker abweichend, habe mal im dortigen CS nachgefragt https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186328771
gnlpfth (2026-07-29 20:16:03+00:00): Ich hab die Farben vom Gesamtnetzplan, per Screenshot in Inkscape befördert und dort ausgelesen. Hatte ich gerade auch mit den Nachtbussen vor, bis ich diesen CS gesehen habe :)

Die Abweichungen bei Bus und Bim ist jeweils eine Stelle bei einer Farbe im Hex-Code, der Rest ist gleich. Da ist der Unterschied bei der Schriftfarbe der Nachtbusse zwischen meinen Ergebnissen (FFED00) und deinen Eintragungen vergleichsweise groß, aber trotzdem nicht wirklich erkennbar.
DressyPear4 (2026-07-28 12:54:50+00:00): Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/186517742
ftrebien (2026-07-28 17:05:01+00:00): Vandalismo. Este changeset mudou o limite de 30 para 60 km/h num trecho com várias lombadas e placas indicando 30 km/h (salvo 1 placa que indica 40).
DressyPear4 (2026-07-28 12:54:49+00:00): Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/186517742
ftrebien (2026-07-28 17:00:27+00:00): Mudou de 60 pra 80 km/h mas o trecho tem várias placas indicando que é 60 km/h. Ao contrário do comentário no changeset, obviamente não verificou a sinalização.
DressyPear4 (2026-07-28 12:54:48+00:00): Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/186517742
ftrebien (2026-07-28 16:37:52+00:00): Vandalismo. A sinalização indica 60 km/h na ponte no sentido sul e 40 km/h no sentido norte. Não há como interpretar que é 80 km/h, como foi mapeado neste changeset.
söm4324 (2026-07-29 06:31:58+00:00): Hallo mcbax,

bitte beachte, dass Uhrzeiten mit führender 0 geschrieben werden.
Also "Mo-Su 05:00-22:00" statt "Mo-Su 5:00-22:00"

Die Uhrzeiten sind sonst nämlich ungültig und werden von den Programmen nicht richtig erkannt.
Hier noch das Wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours

Viele Grüße
mcbax (2026-07-29 09:24:22+00:00): Oh, wie nachlässig von mir, dann muss ich jetzt wohl alle von mir erstellten POIs noch mal durchgehen und ggf. korrigieren.… VD+LG, Mick
söm4324 (2026-07-29 09:37:50+00:00): Hi Mick,
ich denke, das brauchst du nicht. Denn die ungültigen Einträge tauchen in diesem Auswertetool auf:
https://opening-hours.pages.dev/
und können dort recht leicht korrigiert werden.

Für Brandenburg und Mecklenburg-Vorpommern zum Beispiel ist alles schon erledigt.

Viele Grüße,
Thomas
mcbax (2026-07-29 09:51:21+00:00): Hallo Thomas, prima, hatte mich gerade schon daran gemacht.… Du hattest ja schon mal geschrieben, aber ich hatte die Benachrichtigungsmail direkt gelöscht, weil ich dachte, sie bezöge sich auf einen meiner Hinweise und ich würde das ja auf der Karte sehen und habe das dann aber natürlich nicht gefunden.… Jetzt weiß ich also auch noch wie ich da über Benachrichtigen wieder dran komme.… Nochmals Vielen Dank und Beste Grüße, Mick
tomhukins (2026-07-28 16:11:37+00:00): Thank you, are you sure this is mapped in exactly the right location?
Wildsharky (2026-07-30 06:41:30+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186621428
DressyPear4 (2026-07-28 12:54:47+00:00): Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/186517742
ftrebien (2026-07-28 15:48:57+00:00): Vandalismo. Mudou maxspeed de 40 pra 60, mas há sinalização indicando 40.
DressyPear4 (2026-07-28 12:54:46+00:00): Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/186517742
ftrebien (2026-07-28 15:37:22+00:00): Há placas nas entradas do trecho alterado indicando o limite de 60 km/h, que estava mapeado corretamente antes, não 80 km/h. Vandalismo.
DressyPear4 (2026-07-28 12:54:45+00:00): Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/186517742
ftrebien (2026-07-28 15:35:13+00:00): Há placas ao redor do entroncamento indicando redução para 30 km/h. Estava correto antes. Vandalismo.
jnpoJuwan (2026-07-28 00:09:11+00:00): The changes to the borders of the neighbourhood and parish are unintentional and need to be reverted.
DressyPear4 (2026-07-28 12:54:44+00:00): Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/186517742
ftrebien (2026-07-28 15:33:17+00:00): No sentudo oeste-leste, há uma placa indicando que o limite é 50, e no sentido contrário, há outra indicando que é 40. Este changeset mudou incorretamente o limite de 50 (leitura implícita) para 60 inclusive no trecho com redução para 40.
DressyPear4 (2026-07-28 12:18:30+00:00): Imagem EoxSentinel 2025
DressyPear4 (2026-07-28 12:54:42+00:00): Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/186517742
ftrebien (2026-07-28 15:18:47+00:00): Não está conforme a sinalização: há placas de 60 km/h no local, mapeador mudou maxspeed de 60 para 80.
ftrebien (2026-07-28 15:15:19+00:00): Para constar: o trecho pelo centro de Muriaé tem placas de 50 km/h nos trechos em que este mapeador trocou maxspeed de 50 para 60. Há inclusive placas de 40 km/h (ainda não mapeados corretamente) em trechos onde ele pôs 60.
Wildsharky (2026-07-30 08:19:44+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186629527
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-29 02:31:43+00:00): Unfortunately, there are still several issues with this changeset:

- It is tagged oneway=yes, which is impossible (which iD warned you about, but you evidently ignored)--if that were actually so, it would not be possible for anyone who entered it to ever leave, and I assume you're not operating Hotel California here :)
- You state it is a private road accessible to your customers, so access=no is most certainly incorrect--it would only be true if no one, not even you, could access it. access=customers could be technically correct here, but given the relatively private nature of the clientele, I tagged it as access=private instead
- You mention it's a "private drive" and "not a road", so I appropriately tagged it service=driveway so it is treated and rendered accordingly
- Finally, you mention it is about 20 m long -- you made it less than half that length. Therefore, I extended it a bit to be a closer match for what you described above.

I've fixed all these issues (except for the oneway=yes , which someone else already spotted and fixed before) in changeset 186557163

https://osm.org/changeset/186557163
arcizy (2026-07-28 01:33:42+00:00): Definisi jalan adalah prasarana transportasi darat, kalau sudah ditutup road barrier di kedua sisi, apakah masih layak disebut prasarana transportasi? No, itu hanya sebuah tanah kosong
B252697 (2026-07-28 01:13:05+00:00): Official Map: https://isomer-user-content.by.gov.sg/152/c30f195b-524e-4384-9b8f-969a2fe28245/Map%20Current%20PDF%20040326.pdf
Loopslol7 (2026-07-28 01:57:04+00:00): Source: survey and aerial
Andador da Mata (2026-07-28 02:20:44+00:00): And Florest zones
MiLorde (2026-07-28 23:45:53+00:00): Favor verificar se a via é de mão única, pois o sinal de parada obrigatória apenas tem validade no OSM se a via for oneway.
Edi Nelson Riggs (2026-07-29 00:21:49+00:00): Olá Milorde sim a via é de mão única e não fora indicado direção na direção...
Edi Nelson Riggs (2026-07-30 00:09:02+00:00): Agora que entendi seu questionamento, na realidade esta parte da via é mão dupla mesmo
zorglubu (2026-07-28 14:50:29+00:00): Bonjour,
Merci pour vos contributions. Veuillez noter que les chemins à travers champs, ou les chemins forestiers, etc. ne faisant pas partie du réseau routier général, doivent porter l'attribut highway=track et non highway=unclassified, ce dernier concernant plutôt des routes reliant d'autre routes plus importantes du réseau routier. Je vais faire la correction.

Par contre, vous avez bien fait d'ajouter motor_vehicle=no, si c'est interdit y compris aux motos.

voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:highway=track et https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:highway%3Dunclassified

Merci encore et bonne continuation sur OSM. :-)
mavl (2026-07-28 14:35:21+00:00): Здравствуйте. В редакторе iD (которым вы пользовались) есть команда "Сделать углы прямыми".
u2opb (2026-07-29 03:13:55+00:00): Спасибо за подсказку, углы поправил
mavl (2026-07-29 04:12:51+00:00): Вам спасибо. Если хотите, то можете использовать тег start_date=2025 для указания даты постройки.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:start_date
NeisRevert (2026-07-28 06:59:56+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/186501043
Comment: "Remove spam"
NeisRevert (2026-07-28 07:00:44+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/186501075
Comment: "Remove spam"
Wildsharky (2026-07-30 08:51:48+00:00): Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186630185
eggie (2026-07-28 06:21:35+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-07-28 06:24:31+00:00): Info samengevoegd met adresnode.
Kaloan-koko (2026-07-28 06:05:04+00:00): Съдейки по еднаквата дограма, това би трябвало просто да е входа за "Glowjob".
Интересно, че изглежда тъмно и празно. 
Може би просто е с някакви странни стъкла, които не допускат много светлина?
Dimitar155 (2026-07-28 09:05:17+00:00): И по кадастър е тяхно, понеже го дават като един самостоятелен обект (68134.205.441.1.33), а около него са само гаражи.
alpacaMaps (2026-07-29 01:16:42+00:00): This changeset adds one or more surveillance cameras in a spot that looks unlikely — the nodes sit well away from any road, which usually means the cameras aren't physically present on the ground.

If these cameras are real, please let us know so the map stays accurate. Otherwise, we'd kindly ask that you avoid adding cameras that aren't actually there, and that you remove any temporary or test nodes once you're done.

If this was simply a mistake, no problem at all — just clean up the nodes that don't correspond to a real-world camera, and leave a quick note here so we can help.

Thanks for helping keep OpenStreetMap accurate.

— alpacaMaps
eggie (2026-07-28 06:23:41+00:00): De info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode.
Organic is niet ideaal om adressen te bewerken en/of te selecteren.
MVG
eggie
DLRLA2025BI (2026-07-28 05:30:13+00:00): I also introduced a slightly different naming approach for North-South Route Stage 1 by adding the stage number and endpoints to the relation names (e.g. Basel Old Town and Basel - Aarau). This is intended as a proposal to improve human readability while keeping the existing stage structure and the "from", "to" and "stage" tags. If the local mapping community prefers the shorter naming convention currently used elsewhere, it can of course be adjusted.

The North-South route now uses the combined 3;EV5 ref format on all stages except Stage 1.1, following the existing EV15/Rhine Route approach.
rhhs (2026-07-31 13:41:14+00:00): Hi, thanks for your many good edits! However I noticed there are sometimes typos in the opening hours you enter, for instance for "Handmade Tania Vanovska" (what time does it open on Saturday?).
If you type opening hours, a mistake is easily made so maybe you could enter them here https://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/ and check them for errors...
Kaloan-koko (2026-07-31 18:06:41+00:00): Thanks for noticing, I will check tomorrow and correct it.
Syl (2026-07-28 17:01:09+00:00): Bonjour, merci pour l'ajout mais sans le nom comment vous avez-pu confirmer les infos de la note anonyme https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5415061 ?
Et sinon pouvez-vous penser à mettre les notes utilisées dans le groupe de modifications pour faciliter le suivi des modifications ?
BaboucheVerte (2026-07-29 15:58:55+00:00): Salut Syl, 
je suis parti du principe qu'une persone créant une note anonyme: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5415061
puis quelque jour plus tard se crée un compte OSM pour recréer une seconde note: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5421662
est juste une personne ne maitrisant pas les outils OSM et voulant ajouter son resto.

Bien sûr, celà est soumis à interprétation, je peux revert mon changeset si tu considères que ce n'est pas suffisant pour ajouter le resto dans OSM.
Syl (2026-07-30 06:23:08+00:00): Effectivement je n'ai vu la deuxième note qu'après avoir écris mon commentaire.

Ce n'est pas la peine de revert. Si il n'y a pas de modification prochainement suite à ton commentaire sur la note, je ferais des recherches pour trouver plus d'infos sur ce resto.
Bonne journée !
BaboucheVerte (2026-07-30 10:23:28+00:00): Tu peux essayer de contacter le créateur de la note également: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/MarcDeSaintMau

mais il ne m'a pas répondu :)
felipeeugenio (2026-07-28 12:43:12+00:00): Hola. Buena edición. Gracias
Pero llevo bastante rato corrigiendo detalles.
Por favor no usar contracciones en los nombres.
Por favor no usar nombres descriptivos.
y por algun motivo duplico varios caminos que ahora estoy racionalizando.
Pero igual buena edición. Solo que cuidado con los detalles.

Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186497758
NeisRevert (2026-07-28 06:59:14+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/186501014
Comment: "Remove spam"
habi (2026-07-28 14:43:00+00:00): Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap!
Schön machst du hier mit und hilfst, die Karte und die Kartendaten zu pflegen.

Trinkbar halten wir in OpenStreetMap mit `drinking_water=yes' fest. Ich habe das in https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6147075195/history/6 verbessert

E Gruess us der Nachbarschaft.
habi
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-28 06:49:28+00:00): Classification originally changed in changeset 186453548 with cited source of copying other map data

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186453548
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-28 06:49:33+00:00): 
The oneway=* tag was added in added in changeset 186479990 based on signage, but was incorrectly added to entire way instead of just southern/left branch.

https://osm.org/changeset/186479990
eggie (2026-07-28 06:52:40+00:00): Welkom bij OSM.. De info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode.

MVG
eggie
GerdP (2026-07-28 07:18:51+00:00): Korrektur Kommentar paste&copy Fehler: Radtour am 27.7.2026
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-29 20:14:38+00:00): As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality of your mapping and avoid consequences for your account and the features you map. See https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more information.

Fixed remaining malformed/SEO tagging for POI in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/186608336
GerdP (2026-07-28 07:19:04+00:00): Korrektur Kommentar paste&copy Fehler: Radtour am 27.7.2026
user_5359 (2026-07-29 17:58:07+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1545327705 (one more 400 objects). What is the mean of the tags
Etat = ok
Materiau_mur = Parpaing
Materiau_toit = Tôle
full_id = w703269895
grma_project = yes
layer = batiment_zone1-ERIC — building
path = C:/Users/Administrator/Documents/Collecte_zone1/batiment_zone1-ERIC.gpkg|layername=building
?
alpacaMaps (2026-07-29 15:06:21+00:00): Based on previous vandalism we are concerned these nodes do not exist. If they do, please DM me so we can have a conversation about accuracy and keeping DeFlock / OSM accurate. 

Thanks,
alpacaMaps
alpacaMaps (2026-07-29 15:06:20+00:00): Based on previous vandalism we are concerned these nodes do not exist. If they do, please DM me so we can have a conversation about accuracy and keeping DeFlock / OSM accurate. 

Thanks,
alpacaMaps
alpacaMaps (2026-07-29 15:06:19+00:00): Based on previous vandalism we are concerned these nodes do not exist. If they do, please DM me so we can have a conversation about accuracy and keeping DeFlock / OSM accurate. 

Thanks,
alpacaMaps
alpacaMaps (2026-07-29 15:06:18+00:00): Based on previous vandalism we are concerned these nodes do not exist. If they do, please DM me so we can have a conversation about accuracy and keeping DeFlock / OSM accurate. 

Thanks,
alpacaMaps
alpacaMaps (2026-07-29 15:06:17+00:00): Based on previous vandalism we are concerned these nodes do not exist. If they do, please DM me so we can have a conversation about accuracy and keeping DeFlock / OSM accurate. 

Thanks,
alpacaMaps
alpacaMaps (2026-07-29 15:06:16+00:00): Based on previous vandalism we are concerned these nodes do not exist. If they do, please DM me so we can have a conversation about accuracy and keeping DeFlock / OSM accurate. 

Thanks,
alpacaMaps
alpacaMaps (2026-07-29 15:06:15+00:00): Based on previous vandalism we are concerned these nodes do not exist. If they do, please DM me so we can have a conversation about accuracy and keeping DeFlock / OSM accurate. 

Thanks,
alpacaMaps
alpacaMaps (2026-07-29 15:06:14+00:00): Based on previous vandalism we are concerned these nodes do not exist. If they do, please DM me so we can have a conversation about accuracy and keeping DeFlock / OSM accurate. 

Thanks,
alpacaMaps