piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
HelenDoesMaps (2025-01-21 04:27:55+00:00): I'm still new to OSM, so any advice that you give to me is greatly appreciated.
To be honest, I didn't think that what I do here would be that important. I wanted to edit for OSM just because of an annoyance that I have with most maps not being updated enough. I just wanted to fix some small issues, so I didn't try to be exact when adding to the map, instead I just traced from GPS. Now I'll try to be more precise when making changes.
I don't have telegram so I can't join.
HelenDoesMaps (2025-01-21 04:32:35+00:00): And about that path, yes, it does not exist anymore. Where the path once was is now a bomb shelter and a dog park, which I 𝙁𝙤𝙧𝙜𝙤𝙩 𝙩𝙤 𝙖𝙙𝙙 (with how many things I keep forgetting it's gonna take years to finish this part).
HelenDoesMaps (2025-01-21 04:34:17+00:00): btw sorry for replying a bit late I was busy
yrtimiD (2025-01-21 18:42:37+00:00): No worries, this map is very popular in some areas, so assume that any of your changes is immediately visible for million users and might affect their navigation :)
yrtimiD (2025-01-21 18:44:30+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Israel
Here you can find common rules for our area and other contact options including forum which doesn't require any app install.
PostaMap_Infinite (2025-01-20 04:58:58+00:00): Wrong changeset description! I combined an address node and a building
f_husni (2025-01-20 06:33:31+00:00): hallo mohon cek https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1327803691 anda membuat landuse dan jalan menjadi tergabung. menurut standar operasional openstreetmap hasil editing anda tida dibenarkan. usahakan jika ingin membuat landuse tidak menyatu dengan objek lain seperti bangunan dan jalan
NeisBot (2025-02-06 10:34:35+00:00): Hi tli2, thank you for your contribution to the OSM project.

Over the last days and weeks, you've made at least 26 with minimal or no meaningful comments.

To enhance collaboration, please consider using the comment field to describe your map changes. This helps others understand and follow your adjustments more easily. You can find guidance on good changeset comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 

Thanks!

I've also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
mavl (2025-03-07 15:07:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:07:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:06:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:08:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:09:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:07:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:07:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:06:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:08:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:06:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:06:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:05:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
Kovoschiz (2025-01-21 17:25:12+00:00): Please read carefully before you use tags randomly. `=berth` is used for individual berths, where there can be many at piers or quays. It is a point feature.
Kovoschiz (2025-01-21 18:04:28+00:00): Or the area should be on water for berthing. Not what it is berthed to.
mavl (2025-03-07 15:05:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:06:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
papaj (2025-01-20 14:40:13+00:00): Hi jajanja3,
Just a quick reminder to please use meaningful changeset comments instead of just 'Modifying & Creating new features' to describe what you are actually doing (Example: 'Better aligning road to Bing sat imagery and adding trees')

Thanks.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-01-20 07:51:00+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12517781860

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Shyshka (2025-01-20 14:16:25+00:00): Який сенс додавати неіснуючу Wikidata?
damianeue (2025-01-27 18:41:45+00:00): Hi SekeRob, why did you create again way #320018272? It doesn't exist anymore, it's part of the sidewalk
SekeRob (2025-01-28 08:28:29+00:00): You mean to say that roundabout bypass is nolonger there? It's not what my memory says of last weeks crossing onto Pindaro, could have been on autopilot. I'll include it in todays giro and fix it next.
SekeRob (2025-01-28 11:00:37+00:00): BTW, one ethos in OSM is preserving chronology, turn restrictions can be edited, you don't delete and create new ones. Here the razed:highway lifecycle tag would have applied. This signals to the next mapper something changed. I fall foul of this rule myself, still, but since someone deleted new buildings and mapped the demolished ones back I keep old buildings and add more tags to signal it was and nolonger is.

Your CS comments are not very informational, and when there are more mappers in the same area it's all the more important. Reminds me of that roundabout you deleted then remapped on Marconi when it was gone. That's a true candidate for such tagging excluding it from routers but retaining it for mappers. It would have prevented this duh. I'll check the geometry in while. It continues to be a dangerous junction for cyclists, so i actually leave the track and go on the road there for more visibility both ways regardless of the sign for obligatory use. Seen a scooter there hit by car.... scooter drivers behavior not exactly secure many a time so who was to blame I cant say.

BTW the disused Sangritaria passing Casoli... long overdue to get the abandoned tag prefix. In parts the rail is really gone. 57 level crossings needing updating since the installations are disabled.
SekeRob (2025-01-28 12:47:14+00:00): Updt. Every cm is still there, now a segregated cycleway witb a 90 degrees connsction. The geometry ill work over
NorthCrab_upload (2025-01-20 08:10:48+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12517810844

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Negreheb (2025-04-15 06:40:19+00:00): Hallo Zachary, schön, dass du mitmachst, aber hier sind dir einige Fehler passiert bei der Straße und der Trenner bei OSM ist das Semikolon ; - wie bist du denn auf "/_" als trenner gekommen? Damit wir wissen, wo es angepasst gehört. 
Und beim Glockenturm ist dir ein Rechtschreibfehler beim namen reingerutscht - hier sollte aber gar kein name sein. :) 
Wenn du fragen hast, kannst du dich ja gern melden .
Syl (2025-01-20 10:04:33+00:00): Thanks for the change of operator.
I add the name of the bakery few months ago. Are you sure it has changed? If it's only a iD suggestion please check before applying them, they're not all right.
eultra (2025-01-20 11:28:17+00:00): Have reverted the bakery name change, I'll be more careful on accepting the ID suggestions
Syl (2025-01-20 14:17:13+00:00): Thanks!
grzegorz75jan (2025-01-23 15:10:18+00:00): :) Cóż. Poprzednicy też zrobili błąd. Puki co to jest jako skrzynka na listy błędnie otagowana. Jeżeli to ma być paczkomat to tu jest przepis https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker
pitfire (2025-01-21 10:27:33+00:00): Hallo kuchenblechmafiosi,

danke für Deine Beiträge zur OSM Datenbank.

Leider gibt es einiges zu hinterfragen.
Die gesamte Strecke ist eindeutig kein reiner "cycleway",
sondern ein Gemeinsamer Geh- und Radweg.
Seit 2008 ist es anerkannt, für alle Rad- und Gehwege highway=path zu verwenden.
Dazu findet Du je nach Vorfindesituation hier die differenzierte 
Beschreibung:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen_kartieren#highway=cycleway_und_highway=footway

Der Rad- und Gehweg ist baulich abgesetzt, oder der Geh- und Radweg ist baulich nicht abgesetzt. 

Am Startpunkt liegen jetzt trasse übereinander !

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=4050293475049857&focus=photo&lat=51.08039839999998&lng=7.539265&z=18.814642620856045&mapStyle=OpenStreetMap&x=0.48831370358997195&y=0.6263512272580739&zoom=0

Wegabschnitt Weg: 1352860236 ist eine Brücke, obwohl in 
mapillary an der Stelle keine Trasseüberlagerungen erkennbar sind.
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=945019863689014&focus=photo&lat=51.08285890000002&lng=7.5316695999999865&z=17&x=0.48243891075428424&y=0.5132871409434427&zoom=1.13543599257885 

VG pitfire
kublema (2025-01-21 10:57:46+00:00): Hallo pitfire,

vielen Dank für die Hinweise! Ich bin noch Recht neu dabei und kannte die Regelung für Radwege nicht. 
Ich habe die Hinweise übernommen und entsprechende Änderungen vorgenommen 

VG,
Kbm
pitfire (2025-01-21 12:29:27+00:00): Hi kuchenblechmafiosi,
das ist nachvollziehbar.

Es fehlt aber immer noch der Zusatz:
+ segregated=no
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:segregated.

Die Trassen "Weg: 377176371" werden von "Weg: 1352860234" überlappt!

Der "Knoten: 12517830367" liegt ohne Verbindung zur Hauptstrasse im Nirwana!

Die Strassentrasse braucht noch Infos über neuen separaten Weg:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen_kartieren#Erfassung_als_eigenst%C3%A4ndige_Linie

Insbesondere die Abschnitte:
Gemeinsamer Geh- und Radweg
Der Geh- und Radweg ist baulich nicht durch einen Grünstreifen, Graben, Büsche, usw. von der Fahrbahn abgesetzt. 
&
Gemeinsamer Geh- und Radweg
Der Geh- und Radweg ist baulich durch einen Grünstreifen, Graben, Büsche, usw. von der Fahrbahn abgesetzt. 

VG
❤️‍🔥 (2025-01-20 10:05:38+00:00): Hi, what source did you use for this edit? (apart from the osm note)

Every transit app that I checked shows that this stop still exists and the 324 bus stops here
pitscheplatsch (2025-01-20 10:13:37+00:00): Hi, as mentioned, the change is based on the user's note and the aerial photo. The user could have deleted the node themselves.

If there are other sources, my change must be reverted.
❤️‍🔥 (2025-01-20 12:03:14+00:00): thanks for the quick response, I think the notes are confused since there are 3 similar ones at this location. I've restored the bus stop for now
pitscheplatsch (2025-01-20 12:04:57+00:00): Ok, thanks for your help!
empty_child (2025-01-20 11:09:01+00:00): Yes, looks valid
os-emmer (2025-02-15 12:59:01+00:00): Hello Yuri Skvortsov,
it seems that you added a lot of wikidata=Qxxxxxxxx with this and other changesets.
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1YO4
What does that mean? Wikidata-IDs always consist of a "Q" followed by numbers and not letters. Can you please check that?
ivanbranco (2025-04-01 13:29:44+00:00): Restored previous situation after 2 months without reply from user: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164375398
os-emmer (2025-04-01 14:50:58+00:00): Thanks for that.
Yog Sot (2025-01-20 23:41:46+00:00): hm, a czego dokładnie to jest memorial ? Bo bez tego to troche bez sensu
grzegorz75jan (2025-01-21 01:11:48+00:00): Mamutinka to ktoś od mapy.cz
Czasami coś dodaje lub przekazuje uwagi które zostały zgłoszone na ich mapie. Zdjęcie jest jeszcze ciepłe https://pl.mapy.cz/s/puzavamela
grzegorz75jan (2025-01-21 01:47:33+00:00): Pomieszane trochę w tym parku. Lokalizacja zdjęć na mapycz tego pomnika różna. Zdjęcia bez lokalizacji https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?search=Radojewo&title=Special:MediaSearch&go=Przejd%C5%BA&type=image a szkoda.
Yog Sot (2025-01-21 20:20:08+00:00): aha, no to jest grób, a nie memoriał ;d
ale dziś na wieczór sprawdze na jednym filmie, który mam nadzieje, ze odnajdę. 
No i cmentarz jest pare metrów obok ;]
grzegorz75jan (2025-01-21 21:16:04+00:00): Nie wnikałem ale tak pobieżnie patrząc to nie wiem czy cmentarz nie jest zdublowany a bywa że jest cmentarz a obok taki rodzinny cmentarzyk. Sztuczna ruina też ma różne nazwy.https://zabytek.pl/pl/obiekty/g-267623/dokumenty/PL.1.9.ZIPOZ.NID_N_30_EN.373508/11  Może też być dodatkowo pomnik czy inne upamiętnienie. Dalej to kwestia poprawnych lokalizacji. Zdjęcia na mapy.cz mają rozrzut  w położeniu. Zdjęcia się tam ogląda po kliknięciu na obiekt lub też w lewym górnym rogu masz zmień mapę i wtedy często widać foty które nie są przypięte. Na Wikimedia Commons dużo nie znalazłem ale mogą być pod innymi ... hasłami. Strona zabytek.pl milczy o tym. czasem na emapie czy webewid można się dokopać do podobnej warstwy zabytków. Są bardzo podobne ale się różnią. Przy pałacu jest też od nich roczna uwaga.
Yog Sot (2025-01-21 21:50:26+00:00): nie no, ja to miejsce dobrze znam i już niejedno sam zmapowałem, ale muszę najwyraźniej znów sprawdzić to w terenie, bo sprawdziłem, nie ma tego na cmentarzu i sa dwa groby poza cmentarzem i tego też tam nie ma, więc bede to weryfikował w terenie ;)
filmik: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VfWb-ZyzQkY 
i zdjęcie opisane jako częściowo zniszczony pomnik: https://eksploratorzy.com.pl/viewtopic.php?t=1968&p=6865
frosm (2025-04-14 21:44:34+00:00): Bonjour,
pourquoi avoir déconnecté le croisement de la rue du trottoir ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2403444977
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/232004556/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/43666999
JLZIMMERMANN (2025-04-16 05:23:05+00:00): Bonjour,
Il arrive que je fasse du recalage des emprises résidentielles et des géométries que je peux percevoir bizarres. En regardant attentivement, j'ai rattaché le nœud concerné au surfacique piéton.
Est-ce que cela va mieux ainsi ?
Yunan973 (2025-02-27 16:16:59+00:00): Bonjour,
selon le site de l'Ehpad, https://ehpadlafourcade.wordpress.com/contact/, le nom de la voie serait impasse de gascogne et non pas allée de Gascogne.
Il semblerait qu'un nom soit visible tout au nord de la voie (côté route océane) mais il est flouté sur BingStreet et GoogleStreet.
Sur la base adresse nationale et dans la liste des codes fantoir il y a une impasse et une rue de gascogne mais pas d'allée.

es tu sûr qu'elle s'appelle allée ?
LeoJavelot-CCSX (2025-02-27 16:50:25+00:00): Bonjour, 
Effectivement, je n'avais pas fait attention mais ce n'est dans tous les cas pas une allée. Je pense qu'auparavant la voie s'appelait "rue de Gascogne" mais c'est passé à "impasse de Gascogne" quand il a été décidé de fermer l'accès côté super U (aujourd'hui réouvert...). Le panneau sur place indique "impasse" (vu sur street view) mais elle redeviendra surement une rue une fois les travaux finis, car elle va passer en sens unique.
totera (2025-01-20 13:41:22+00:00): Qui hai cancellato gli attraversamenti pedonali e il vialetto pedonale di accesso alla chiesa...
Premesso che tutto ciò che esiste nella realtà può essere mappato, questi elementi sono fondamentali per il routing pedonale.
BCNorwich (2025-01-20 13:25:33+00:00): Hi, Mill Road is an unclassified road ref U7063 from the B1063 to the PRoW near the gate. From there to the  A143 It is a farm track designated as a Public Footpath. The above information is available on the county definitive map. The names you added are at best unneeded descriptions, definitely not formal names. Thus I've made corrections to reinstate the original data but showing the general access to the track as agricultural.

Regards Bernard.
rdude21 (2025-01-20 17:50:13+00:00): Hi Bernard I live at great mill and my father lives at min-y-felin who owns the dirt track to the A143 which has a gate on just before his house. The problem we are getting is Amazon deliverys trying to get to great mill and Milltop (used to be called Cheray) and min-y-felin. It clearly states on delivery only from the B1063 but they always say their map shows different, apparently Amazon use this map. So hence why I have updated. Thanks for your reply Richard
BCNorwich (2025-01-20 19:15:46+00:00): Hi Richard, It's good to be able to talk things through. If I may first explain something, OpenStreetMap is not actually a conventional map. It is a licensed open database from which anyone can compile a map. Amazon has  its own proprietary mapping software based on OpenStreetMap data, which includes GPS technology supposedly to assist drivers in finding the most efficient routes to customer locations. It is Amazon's incorrect use of OSM data for their routing algorithm that often causes problems. I can assure you that OSM always strives to have verifiable ground truth in its database that, if used properly should cause no trouble. 

The track is now tagged with access=agricultural and motor_vehicle=no which means agricultural use only, no other vehicles. I've tagged the gate with access=private
and motor_vehicle=no. These tags properly interpreted mean no vehicles should approach from the A143. Lastly, is the gate locked, if so the tag locked=yes could be added to it?

Regards Bernard.
rdude21 (2025-01-20 20:31:36+00:00): Hi thanks for the reply. 

yes the gate is locked and open by remote fobs but does not affect the footpath. 
 
I’ve just put in directions from the plumbers arms crossroads CB8 8PB on the A143 towards bury st Edmund’s the road from the church crosses the A143 to denston to  go to CB8 8YJ and it said go via the track.
BCNorwich (2025-01-21 07:31:31+00:00): Hi, I am assuming you are using the OSM front page map to test the routing:- https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions#map=16/52.15574/0.56439&layers=N.  Please first refresh/reload that webpage in your browser. Now paste in the postcodes. For me the three car routing options work as expected going via Malting End. I must admit there is one problem, when reversed the GrapHopper option is incorrect. This points to the GrapHopper either not using up-to-date data or not using the OSM data correctly.

I've now added locked=yes to the gate.

You should now find the same routing as I do. But bear in mind that the delivery problem might still be that Amazon uses the OSM map data incorrectly, disregarding access restrictions in the map data..

Regards Bernard.
rdude21 (2025-01-22 08:40:30+00:00): That’s brilliant thanks for your help I appreciate it.
mavl (2025-02-05 14:03:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162167075 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted. Reason: wrong values for name:en - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161608012].
eggie (2025-01-20 09:26:24+00:00): Feedback.. Lijkt me oke.. De vraag is weer of de parkeerplaats ook echt bos is? 
Groet
eggie
Frans S (2025-03-27 14:08:49+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please do not include the courtyards as a part of a building.
Best regards and keep mapping
eggie (2025-01-20 09:29:29+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback  Dit lijkt me allemaal niet correct . Waarom access=no op de Airbornlaan?
access=no is Verboden Toegang.
motor_vehicle=yes hoort niet op reguliere wegen.
We kun je bicycle=use_sidepath en foot=use_sidepath toevoegen aan de hoofdrijbaan

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-01-20 09:55:14+00:00): De accesstagging heb ik aangepast zie bovenstaand commentaar.
access=no is bijna altijd fout.
Mapse
eggie
Patalakki (2025-03-01 18:01:06+00:00): Hei! Miksi olet muuttanut Kristiinankaupungin kohdepisteen luokitusta place=town'ista place=city'ksi? Se, että nimessä nyt sattuu olemaan sana "kaupunki" tai se, että Kristiinankaupunki on myös hallinnollisesti kaupunki, ei oikeuta tunnistetta place=city, sillä se on varattu suurille kaupungeille, Suomessa esim. maakuntakeskuksille. Sellainen Kristiinankaupunki ei ole. Oikea tunniste tälle on place=town.
liljaadeliina (2025-03-03 09:43:50+00:00): Selvä asia, kiitos selvennyksestä.
eggie (2025-01-20 10:01:06+00:00): Dag JacQues  Scholen kunnen op meer manieren.

De naam staat al op het schoolterrein.. dus hoeft niet op het gebouw.
Het zal ook niet de naam van het gebouw zelf zijn. Die twee namen achter elkaar geeft ook verwarrring. 
De naam beter verwijderen van het gebouw. 

MVG
eggie
j a c Q u e s (2025-01-20 10:26:26+00:00): Ah, inderdaad. Had ik gemist. Sorry.
eggie (2025-01-20 09:21:54+00:00): Dag Insinger..  

Dit lijkt me allemaal meer kloppen.
Ik heb de parking even losgemaakt van de wegdelen. 
Het is natuurlijk wel de vraag of die parkeerplaats ook bos is. Wellicht beter scheiden van het bos.
Dat laatste deel van de parkeerplaats routeert niet, want de weg en slagboon staan op private en no.
MVG
eggie

MVG
eggie