piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Ogmios (2023-02-19 15:13:57+00:00): Hi, I couldn't idetify a more suiting tag for these small patches of greenery which is why I chose this one. Which would you suggest?
Tjuro_Global (2023-02-19 15:41:36+00:00): Hello, if the greenery is mixed in a way where its not a single item anymore.

A possible solution is: landcover=greenery:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landcover%3Dgreenery

Or Landuse=greenery: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dgreenery

But something more specific would be better. Just don’t use landuse=village_green. village_green is a functional area that a community uses for gathering or events. Like a park but less formal.

Greetings
Tjuro
Ogmios (2023-02-19 15:46:50+00:00): ok, has already changed to landuse=grass
Tjuro_Global (2023-02-19 15:57:27+00:00): yea, someone has changed it in:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132749179

But just change it to the most fitting tag.
Ogmios (2023-02-19 16:04:12+00:00): I know that someone changed it, thats what I said. I don't want to start an edit war. I think landuse=grass is less fitting becaus some have grass, some have flower beds, some have scrubs, some have stone gardens and I dont want to tag them individually because they won't stay the same for very long. If you think what I saw isn't fitting, feel free to change it to the fitting tags.
Trevor_1 (2023-02-24 22:40:55+00:00): Hello. "Hatay" is the name of the province, not the city. The name of the city is "Antakya". This place tag should probably be deleted
user_177389 (2023-02-25 07:00:55+00:00): Hello, I added place=district (as it is with the other provinces). In changeset 132820078 this became city again.
See also https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/26480836/history

Best regards,  
Mario
DoctorSpeck (2023-03-07 11:12:47+00:00): I'm sorry, but this was never a building. 

Its tags already include the was: and removed: lifecycle prefixes to denote it is no longer there.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132730944
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-14 05:59:04+00:00): DWG revert:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141240025
emersonveenstra (2023-02-18 23:05:51+00:00): Hi,

Looks like you missed renaming https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/697811923
MarkusHD (2023-02-22 11:52:08+00:00): Hallo Jens, bin über https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3003119 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3003121 hierauf gestoßen.

Es war nicht nur ein Darstellungsthema, Brücken sollen laut Wiki nicht bis an einen kreuzenden Weg reichen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bridge#How_to_map
Scout Jens (2023-02-22 13:13:47+00:00): Vielen Dank Markus! Wieder etwas gelernt. Und mal nichts falsch gemacht :-)
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-18 22:50:36+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10677154281
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10677154282
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10677154283
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10677154342
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10677154377

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
G_P_J (2023-02-24 11:11:17+00:00): Poprawione.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-18 23:00:23+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1147470679
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1147470673
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1147470665
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1147470667
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1147470668
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1147470669
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1147470670
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1147470671
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1147470672
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1147470674
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1147470675
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1147470676
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1147470677
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1147470678
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1147470680

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
danieldegroot2 (2023-02-18 22:58:39+00:00): *correction: added two trees
N7EKB (2023-02-18 23:32:36+00:00): The speed limit on South 228th St between 64th Ave S and Central Ave N has been changed to 30 mph.  I'm too inexperienced with the editor to create a clean change-set for this update.  Perhaps someone with more experience can fix this up on the map?
SK53 (2025-04-28 05:37:37+00:00): Any particular reason why you changed the Zion Methodist Church, Lees from a way to a node?
EvanSiroky (2023-02-28 20:18:47+00:00): Hey there! I'm a local mapper from Scotts Valley, California. I see that you requested a review of this changeset, so I'm giving it a review.

It looks like you've added some helpful information to this business and all things look like they've been added appropriately.
CoyKoi (2023-02-19 23:53:02+00:00): Hi Deishelon welcome to OpenStreetMap thanks for contributing. You've requested a review of this changeset so I have taken a look. It's a good effort  but there are some issues: You updated the construction area (WAY: 912218908) to a building=residential. It should instead be landuse=residential, and it does not require a layer tag. You have drawn approximate outlines of the buildings, and added appropriate tags - nice. However, you will be able to trace them more accurately if you switch to the 'Bing' imagery - it is more recent you can see the buildings to trace them more closely. Try not to connect them to the roads. Cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132732720
Deishelon (2023-02-20 05:17:48+00:00): Thanks, I've done these changes in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132773354
CoyKoi (2023-02-20 21:11:14+00:00): Nice - I have made some further edits in this block, including fixing the residential area which was tagged as a building: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132781435
sydn3y (2023-02-19 00:14:17+00:00): wrong changeset comment; only added ponds
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-19 00:30:28+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o miejscowości. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, zastosuj kombinację addr:city + addr:street. Jeśli nie, przekaż nazwę miejscowości w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/430048724

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
stillhart (2023-10-13 10:01:52+00:00): nice details
Jon Snow 47 (2023-02-19 08:51:02+00:00): Thank you
felipeeugenio (2023-02-19 11:08:26+00:00): Hola. Buenos dias
Te pedimos por favor incoporarte al chat de Telegram (app muy similar a whatsapp) de la Comunidad Chilena. Ahí, cerca de 200 maperos intercambiamos ideas y dudas sobre cómo mapear, desde novatos hasta gente que lleva años.
Todos a quienes demuestran interés en mapear seriamente son invitados al chat. Es importante que te unas para aunar criterios y discutir convenciones.
El link es este: https://t.me/OSMcl
Saludos y nos vemos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132733401
tastrax (2023-02-24 04:21:27+00:00): Hi Folks - I have just started cleaning up some of your golf features. A few common issues - you dont really need a golf tee point as well as a tee box, tee boxes can also have the colours , there should be no flag poles at the pin, you dont need all the relations at each hole (only where the green is within the fairway). Have a good read of the golf wiki for common errors. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course

Cheers - Phil
mueschel (2023-03-04 11:11:01+00:00): Hi,
welcome to OSM.
You used some tags like "LIMITE" in your edits.
This might be a good description of the object, but is not usable in OSM - no software can understand it. Only tags that are described in the wiki or are available in the presets in the editor should be used.

Would you mind checking these tags and change them to documented ones? Let us (e.g. on the forums) know if you need help!
Frans S (2023-02-24 17:04:33+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, during the validation process
I noticed that you are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.
We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,


Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. Just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.
Each rectangular building need to be squared. !! 
Nodes of buildings may not connect to other buildings or features.
The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 
Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.





Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132734108
Frans S (2023-02-24 17:04:38+00:00): Please improve your mapping skills !! We have to spend a lot of time to adjust your mappings to the required standard
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132734108
ivanbranco (2023-02-20 20:18:23+00:00): Ciao Michele. benvenuto su OSM

ho notato alcuni problemi

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/119888886/history
qua hai cancellato il tag building, ma dalle foto satellitari sembra essere proprio un edificio

Hai cancellato molte way che avevano un nome, come Via Corta, Vicolo Montanara, Vicolo Curtatone,  Via Carlo Bini, una way in Piazzale de Laugier, perché?

Hai cancellato Despar. Ora c'è una grande area commerciale senza nessun negozio all'interno, come mai?

Inoltre per favore utilizza commenti ai changeset che facciano capire agli altri mapper cosa hai modificato.
ivanbranco (2023-02-20 20:31:42+00:00): In generale se sei alle prime armi è sempre meglio avere una cautela maggiore con eliminazione e allineamento di elementi già mappati.
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2023-02-28 20:38:57+00:00): نرجوا منكم عدم إضافة عناصر عشوائية للخريطة
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-19 07:55:44+00:00): Please do not add non-existent golfcart features.  This changeset is being reverted.

If you believe that the cartpaths do exist, please elaborate.
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-19 07:57:39+00:00): Reverted changeset in:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132738235
Frans S (2023-02-19 10:19:22+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Your mappings are rather accurate, however, please square each rectangular building with the Q key.

About mapping of tall apartment blocks

Mapping of tall buildings differs from standard buildings. Because the imagery is taken at an angle, you see both the rooflines and also the side of a building. 
How do you map such a building?
Map over the rooflines and lastly slide the mapped building to the footprint.
Here is a video how that is done.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1V5-bADsYiffCD9bo6l64YOdTvmKqMGry/view?usp=share_link



Best regards and keep mapping
houtari (2023-02-19 17:15:30+00:00): ...siis OJA tien alle. ;-)
gpserror (2023-02-23 15:47:58+00:00): Hi, I see there was a warning in your changeset that was flagged and it looks like you removed a section of south college avenue making it impossible to go south on college through horsetooth road.  Could you fix this?
gpserror (2023-02-24 07:39:31+00:00): I ended up reverting your changes in changeset 132954918 and readded some of it, sorry about this but needed to fix that gap.
EvanSiroky (2023-02-28 20:27:07+00:00): Hey there! I'm a local mapper from Scotts Valley, California. I see that you requested a review of this changeset, so I'm giving it a review.

This looks pretty good, although, I would change the classification from "highway=footway" to "highway=path" to show that is not suitable for vehicles.

Also, if you are interested in a more complex way to improve this, you could add this new path to be part of a new Hiking Route Relation. See the OSM Wiki documentation about Hiking Routes here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route=hiking. These hiking routes relations show up in many maps such as this one: https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#?map=14.0/37.9024/-122.6093
00Hein (2023-03-06 17:59:09+00:00): Thank you for your review :-)

I'm changing to highway=path in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133374131

I hadn't known about relations and hiking trails; I don't think it applies to this trail but will keep it in mind for future additions.
Udarian (2023-02-19 06:27:53+00:00): There is still allot of work needed in this area for land use, this is a preliminary commit converting the land use to a multipolygon and adding some of the land use surrounding it. There is still quite a bit of work to be done on the internal area. along with some of the surrounding land use.
Zol87 (2023-03-07 05:05:51+00:00): Shouldn't this be a separate route because it provides 24/7 service between 95th and Harvey and is the only Pace route providing overnight service? I try to mark the Owl routes separately to show which ones have overnight service.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:11:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:10:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:11:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:11:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:10:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
mike140 (2023-02-27 21:24:06+00:00): не потрібно прив'язувати полігони (дерев, наприклад) до доріг
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:11:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:11:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:11:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:10:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
Palolo (2023-02-19 22:25:37+00:00): All buildings should be traced accurately with square corners and tagged building=yes.
pitscheplatsch (2023-02-20 15:15:22+00:00): Hallo, 

weswegen wurde das Merkmal für den Flugnavigationsfunkdienst[1] entfernt? Zumindest bis vor zwei Wochen hat es dort noch gestanden. Zudem wurde es im vergangenen oder vor zwei Jahr neu errichtet.

Danke & Gruß, Pascal

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/440095460

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
geozeisig (2023-02-20 16:15:06+00:00): Das Metallgitter und die 50 Antennen werden nicht als Gebäude erfasst. Das Merkmal ist jetzt in einen node. Auch man_made=beacon war falsch.
Gruß geozeisig
pitscheplatsch (2023-02-20 17:10:05+00:00): Danke für die Antwort.

Ist das irgendwo im OSM Wiki dokumentiert, damit ich mich etwas einlesen könnte?
geozeisig (2023-02-21 06:43:27+00:00): Schau dir die Seite 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:beacon:type%3DDVOR an.
Häufig wird die DVOR mit einer DME kombiniert. Die sind auch fast alle auf einem node gemapped:
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/beacon%3Atype=DVOR%3BDME
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:11:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:11:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:10:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:10:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
Frans S (2023-02-19 12:34:56+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
We welcome you as a new mapper.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, at random or as requested. Your mappings are rather  accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
Rectangular buildings are not always squared.
Nodes of adjacent buildings are often connected to each other.
Each building need to be mapped as an individual building.
Don't cluster multiple buildings.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132737976
ygcgjp5 (2023-02-21 22:37:32+00:00): Kokia logika buvo pakeisti tourism=picnic_site į leisure=picnic_table? Suprantu, kad dėl mano pakeitimo kažkur tikrinime jie pasižymėjo, bet visi kiti Kleboniškyje ir toliau sėkmingai yra tourism=picnic_site...
Tomas Straupis (2023-02-22 06:35:46+00:00): Tiesiog jei nebėra pavadinimo, tai reiškia jis kaip ir nebėra įtrauktinas į lankytinas vietas. Lankytinoms vietoms visada pridedame vienokį ar kitokį pavadinimą. Oficialiai visi jie turi kažkokius pavadinimus, tik ne visada žinomus ir žmogiškus :)
Tomas Straupis (2023-02-22 07:28:46+00:00): Bet tu rašyk, jei galvoji, kad turi likti be pavadinimo ir likti picnic_site. Be ryšio atrodys, na bet aš tai iš tolo žiūriu, o tu - iš arti :-)
ygcgjp5 (2023-02-22 09:16:25+00:00): Šiuo atveju labiau sutikčiau su OSM wiki apibūdinimu – jeigu tai tėra tik pavienis stalas, tai iš tiesų tiktų ir žymėti tik kaip stalą. Tačiau jeigu yra papildoma „piknikinė“ infrastruktūra (kaip kad laužavietė), tai jau arčiau senąjai žymai.

Šiaip tuos pavadinimus nutryniau, nes jie apskritai nieko nesakė – labiau kaip apibūdinimai, o ne kažkoks unikalus vietos pavadinimas. Urėdijos rekreaciniuose objektuose tie stalai klasifikuojami ne kaip atskiri objektai (kuriems dažnai būna suteiktas unikalus pavadinimas), o kaip pėsčiųjų-dviratininkų tako dalis...
Tomas Straupis (2023-02-22 12:01:11+00:00): Na pavadinimai reikalingi tam, kad paieškoje mes matytume bent kažkokį apibūdinimą. Priešingu atveju gauname info, kad ten yra „kažkas“ ir tokių „kažkas“ yra daug. Neina atskirti bevardės vietos Kaune nuo bevardės vietos Palangoje. Žiūrima iš šiek tiek labiau sisteminio taško - jei neturi pavadinimo, tai neverta atskiro/nepriklausamo paminėjimo. Tarkim visokiuose tourism=viewpoint yra tokiu atveju pridedama „Vaizdas į Nemuną“ ar „Užupio regykla“ - kad pavadinimas suteiktų bent kažkokią informaciją.
ygcgjp5 (2023-02-22 22:57:33+00:00): Aš kažkaip laikausi nuomonės, jog antrinti informacijos nereikėtų apibūdinimais. Pvz. ant shop=convenience dėti name=Parduotuvė. Faktą kad tai yra kažkokia poilsio vieta nurodo picnic_site, o kad tai yra Kleboniškyje galima nustatyti iš taško vietos ar netgi poligono po apačia. O jūsų pavyzdį „Vaizdas į Nemuną“ skaityčiau labai priimtinu, nes paprastai neišsiaiškinsi kur koks vaizdas.

Tačiau suprantu ir argumentą dėl paieškos – kaip tada vykdyti paiešką? Vis tiek turėtų būti kažkoks balansas tarp kiekvieno objekto aprašymo ir informacijos „išskaičiavimo“ automatiškai...
Tomas Straupis (2023-02-23 06:32:34+00:00): Teisingai surašyta viskas :) Vat todėl man kaip ir tiko ankstesnis pavadinimas, kad „Kleboniškio poilsiavietė“, aš tai dar skaičiukus pridėčiau 1,2,3. Tada nebus vien „Poilsiavietė“ - kas būtų beprasmiška. O vietą išskaičiuoti iš pozicijos tai nėra taip jau paprasta, nes gi gali gautis „Kauno poilsiavietė“ ir tada pavadinimas bus beprasmiškas, ar „CircleK poilsiavietė“ - ir bus nesąmonė :-)
ygcgjp5 (2023-02-23 10:26:34+00:00): Naujas klausimas – ar mes galim patys susigalvoti objektų pavadinimus? Jeigu mes norime sukurti žemėlapį, turėti pavadinimus gali būti pravartu, bet pats OSM nėra žemėlapis, o tik duomenų rinkinys, tad jame turėtų būti tik objektyvi informacija.
Panašiai dabar yra su Kauno mikrorajonais, kuriuos Povilas užvadino pagal sovietmečiu vykusios statybos etapus. Turime pavadinimą, kuris tiksliau nusako vietą, tačiau niekada gyvenime nesu girdėjęs tokių pavadinimų nuo gimimo gyvendamas tuose rajonuose. Tai ar čia nesigautų tas pats?
Tomas Straupis (2023-02-23 10:55:48+00:00): Miestai, kaimai, rajonai, upės turi savo oficialius pavadinimus - juos ir reikėtų naudoti. Čia kaip ir „Via Baltica“ kažkada buvo diskutuota, nes oficialiai tokio pavadinimo kaip ir nėra. O stovyklavietės tai toks daiktas... na jiems pavadinimus irgi duoda, jie duombazėj kažkur tai tikrai yra, tik tie pavadinimai tokie ir bus, kaip kad buvo įrašyta anksčiau - Kleboniškio miško poilsiavietė II. Buvo kažkada toks miškų tarnybos turizmo objektų žemėlapis, tai ten pavadinimai ir buvo surašyti - vietovė+poilsiavietė+numeris.
silversurfer83 (2023-02-19 10:09:45+00:00): Hi Mika,

deine Straße (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1147539511/) sieht ein wenig ungewöhnlich aus. Laut Luftbild (NRW Orthofoto) ist der Übergang von Kiesweg zu Straße eher ein Wendehammer. Dafür haben wir passende tags, die uns erlauben solche Konstruktionen (das Dreieck) zu vermeiden. Guck mal hier: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dturning_circle
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:turning_circle
Wenn du also nur eine Linie zeichnest kannst du da, wo der Mittelpunkt des Wendehammers ist, einen Punkt auf der Linie erzeugen und diesem Punkt die Eigenschaften highway=turning_circel und turning_circle=square geben. Wenn du vor Ort bist, kannst du sogar den Durchmesser abschreiten und den Wert mit diameter=x (x ist dann dein Wert in Meter) eintragen.

Weiter gute Fahrt
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132739022
Mika99 (2023-02-22 19:28:47+00:00): Vielen Dank für Dein ausführliches Feedback, 'habe wieder was gelernt. Die vorgeschlagene Änderung habe ich als #132896535 hochgeladen.