piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
moonraver (2023-05-31 21:17:14+00:00): Plne beriem tvoje argumenty ale treba zvazovat aj nasledovne:

1. na wiki je uvedene: "Pokud neznáte přesně plochu parkoviště, nebo nemáte čas ji kreslit, pak přidejte pouze uzel". 
Nezabudajme, ze to, ze sme tam dali parkovisko sme sa zhodli IBA MY DVAJA a to len preto, ze tam vidime ludi parkovat auta na trave,strku, asfalte,kade-tade. Su to pravdepodobne zamestnanci  Fiatu a Subaru,lebo ked chodim vecer okolo tak tam nieje vela aut, iba cez den. To ale este nemusi znamenat pre niekoho, ze je to parkovisko, ergo som to vyhodnotil, ze nepoznam presne plochu parkoviska. Ty si ju iba odhadol na zaklade neaktualnej Ortofotomapy. Dalej treba zvazovat, ze hranice parkoviska,ktore si tam zakrelil, sa castom menia (aj teraz su uz realne ine),ale nikto to nepojde merat, iba sa budeme spoliehat na 2 roky staru Ortofoto mapu. Nieco bude zarastat,niekde auta parkuju aj za hranicami parkoviska ak je malo miesta,atd. Pozemok patri SR a moze prist chalpik zo zeleznic a nasype tam kamene, ked pojdu zhutnovat kolajnice a je po parkovisku.Preto bolo v tomto pripade pre mna vhodnejsie dat na stred bod a na mieste si zhodnoti vodic, kde zaparkuje a kde je miesto. Hranice sa tu nedaju urcit ani na zaklade parciel, lebo parkoviska su sucastou jednej velkej parcely okolo kolajnic.

2. mapovat silou-mocou lebo niekto vyhlasil challange, a tym tlacit druhych do veci sa mi zda byt trochu zvlastne. Robme to pre radost, nie pre ego.

To co vravis ty je vpohode a ja k tomu pridavam svoje argumenty, aby bolo zrejme co vsetko zvazujem ak robim parkoviska, ktore ale oficialne parkoviskami NIE SU.
Filip009 (2023-06-01 08:32:16+00:00): Okej, beriem, že tu sa môže hodiť lepšie bod.
K tomu pripájaniu parkoviska k ceste máš aký názor?
moonraver (2023-06-01 18:55:15+00:00): Bod bol v tomto pripade lepsi pre MNA, ty ked si uvazil, ze to chces prerobit na plochu, vobec mi to nevadi. Tam je dolezite slobodne rozhodnutie kazdeho,ako to spravi a ze jeden druheho nenutime, ako to mame robit. Prerobil si to podla wiki a tiez spravne.

Ked som sa ale nad tym tak zamyslal,ze co je dolezite,ked chces niekde zaparkovat:
- najprv najdem na mape parking
- zistim access,teda ci sa da parkovat
- a vlastne vobec nepozeram na tvar odkial pokial je na mape parkovisko (Osmand mi ukaze aj tak iba POI bod a az ked kliknem nan ukaze plochu) a je mi zbytocne aj vediet kolko je tam uvedenych parkovacich miest,lebo z toho neviem ci zaparkujem vobec. Niekedy si tak hororim,ze v OSM je kopec zbytocnych detailov,ktore ti vlastne nic nepovedia
- cize realita je ze pridem na parkovisko,lebo vies ze je tam a na mieste MUSIM pozret aka je situacia a kde je volne a zorientovat sa

Co sa tyka spajania ciest s parkoviskom.Dost casto to pouzivam ak je hned pri ceste a vies nan zajst hned z cesty.Je tam pre to tag "parking=streetside" namiesto klasickeho "parking=surface",co som pouzil aj v nasom pripade,ked som to dokorigoval po tebe.Zvacsovania plochy parkoviska by som sa nebal,lebo aj samotna cesta vedla parkoviska bude vykreslena hrubsie a nie ako tenka ciara.Ani cesta ani parkovisko nebude mat uplne presny rozmer,nic na mape nema uplne presny rozmer,je to zanedbatelne,nikto to nikdy nebude merat, a ani GPSka tiez neni presna.

Ozaj neviem ci mapujes Cesku republiku,ak ano,aku ortofotomapu pouzivas?
Filip009 (2023-06-01 20:25:40+00:00): street_side mi príde skorej ako max jeden rad pri ceste, že viac ako jedno auto sa tam zaparkovať nedá, keď ma chápeš :D
V Česku nemapujem, ale započul som, že teraz im majú uvoľniť Ortofotomapu, ale zatiaľ by som si o tom prečítal niečo tu https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:%C4%8Cesko/freemap
moonraver (2023-06-02 07:35:17+00:00): Ano,vacsinou streetside parking ukazuju ako jednu lajnu popri ceste s moznostou parkovania pozdlz,sikmo,kolmo k vozovke. V nasom pripade tie parkoviska splnaju poziadavku ze "Area suitable or designated for parking which is directly adjacent to the carriageway of a road-either single parking areas (often only for a few vehicles)",  ale toto je zaujmave co tym myslia: "or chains of "bays" or "pockets" alongside the roadway which, in contrast to parking lanes, are structurally designed and therefore regularly interrupted by structural elements like curb extensions or islands for street furniture". Ked das do vyhadavania "parking bay alebo pocket" tak ti ukaze aj viaclajnove parkovanie. V tomto pripade ma splnat, ze je pozdlz cesty. Dokonca moze byt oddelene od cesty predlzenym obrubnikom alebo ostrovcekom.
V kazdom pripade mne nikde na navigacii neukazuje, aky typ je to parkoviska,ukazuje to iba web.Ako uzivatelovi mi je to tiez asi na nic, potrebujem vediet ci tam zaparkujem.
DD1GJ (2023-02-09 11:23:00+00:00): Die Hausnummern 60 und 60a sind bereits als einzelne Adressknoten eingetragen, z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5537848434

OSM ist kein "Kartenmalprogramm" sondern eine Geodatenbank, Dahner bringt es nicht viel, nur die Hausnummer einzutragen, sondern es wird die vollständige Angabe incl. Straße, PLZ und Ort benötigt. Auch mit Komma getrennte Aufzählungen von Hausnummern bringen nichts. Trage dann bitte an der Stelle des jeweiligen Hauseingang einen einzelnen Punkt wie bei der Nummer 60 ein.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf
Damian05 (2023-02-07 11:34:45+00:00): Poprawka informacji dla punktu
NorthCrab (2023-02-07 11:39:42+00:00): Proszę nie nadawaj nazw do parcel locker. Nazwa jest generowana automatycznie i jest tu zbędna.
NorthCrab (2023-02-07 14:37:17+00:00): Nie jest to jakiś szczególny błąd ale po prostu mówię na przyszłość :)
Damian05 (2023-02-09 10:43:05+00:00): Dziękuje za czujność i poprawę błędu NorthCrab.
NorthCrab (2023-02-09 12:28:27+00:00): Cool!
Damian05 (2023-02-07 11:34:23+00:00): Poprawienie drogi i ścieżki
JJIglesias (2023-02-07 17:06:14+00:00): Hi. Please if you include a name for a waterway, could you please include the Tag source:name= as well?
Thanks
JJ
JJIglesias (2023-02-07 16:44:16+00:00): Hi, please be aware that however the Census was done in 2012, the data depicted correspond to the 2016 published ajustment done between the INE and IGM. That is depicted in source:population=ine.gob.bo;2016

BsRgds
JJ
JezCrow (2023-02-08 12:30:41+00:00): Hi IBMapper, you've been great updating the map around Ingleby Barwick recently. 
I have a couple of comments regarding adding buildings:
1) Where a building has corners with right-angles, you should use the "Squaring" tool (right-click, or keyboard shortcut Q)
2) For a building with an open courtyard in the middle like Whitehouse Farm, a relation is best - see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon#iD

Happy mapping,
Jez
IBMapper (2023-02-08 13:34:03+00:00): Thanks Jez. I've worked out the squaring now, but will need to read up a bit more about the court yards. Thanks for the help.
StC (2023-04-03 21:14:46+00:00): Hi!

I don't see the point of the changes in tags of relation 11959152 in this changeset and the next. There already is another relation that covers the Camino route independently of FFRP. This relation is GR65 from FFRP, so either it goes totally (as it should) or it stays with an explicit attribution to FFRP and with the proper reference. I propose to restore ref and operator, and to use the name defined by FFRP : "Sentier vers Saint-Jacques-de-Compostelle via Le Puy".
martien-176 (2023-02-07 15:22:33+00:00): Hi, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. You requested a review of your mappings.

The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location.

Allow me to give some tips on improving your mappings:
- avoid buildings sharing nodes or else overlapping, eg with roads
- pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon.

Please watch these 2 short video for more info:
-Buildings--> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o
-Roads--> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBLwb2nisJQ

Thanks so much for your contribution, Martien, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132201467
bxl-forever (2023-02-07 16:16:20+00:00): Hello,

I wanted to warn you that some of your recent edits are quite damaging to the map.  I am certain you act with the best intentions but you created a high number of orphan footways, which we have to rework after you.  Also, moving shapes of parks, buildings or other places away from their real location—it looks like you are using a mobile app with… Bing imagery—is flagging a lot of warnings here; I have already spent a lot of time cleaning up after your edits and I see some more damage today.

Perhaps it has to do with Go Map, which hides real data being changed.  I felt I had to let you know.
Sree1922 (2023-02-07 11:42:27+00:00): Source used as : MML Orthophoto
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-07 11:50:32+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10614145186
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10614145187

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
syntex (2023-02-07 12:02:49+00:00): Ok, dodane
GJ6J330HSF (2023-02-07 11:58:54+00:00): Thanks
mavl (2023-04-25 09:04:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
Aleksey Gorelikov (2023-02-07 11:55:01+00:00): https://data-usdot.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/usdot::highway-performance-monitoring-system-nhs/explore?location=37.019054%2C-121.585169%2C17.93
maraf24 (2023-02-07 17:21:14+00:00): Wycofane.
mavl (2023-04-25 09:04:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
george1201 (2023-02-08 21:33:14+00:00): Hallo Jens, 
mit deinen letzten Korrekturen sind die neuen Gebäude doch recht gut dargestellt. Da frage ich mich, wozu man noch den Hinweis note/1524409 braucht. Wäre doch an der Zeit ihn zu schließen (nach 4 Jahren). Ok, man könnte noch die Hausnummern (12 und 14) eintragen. Vielleicht auch den landuse=residential auch auf diese Gebäude erweitern. Aber das muss doch kein ungelöster Hinweis mehr sein. Oder?
Scout Jens (2023-02-09 07:56:40+00:00): Ich wusste z.B. nicht, dass es Wohnhäuser sind.
george1201 (2023-02-09 10:41:01+00:00): Im Hinweis sind ein paar Fotos. Ich habe jetzt auch noch nicht die Klingelschilder gelesen. Aber sieht schon danach aus. Sicher bin ich mir aber nicht.
george1201 (2023-02-09 10:44:22+00:00): Landuse kann man ja undefiniert lassen, wenn man Zweifel hat.
george1201 (2023-02-09 12:46:04+00:00): Das Bauprojekt findet man unter https://architrav-karlsruhe.de/index.php?we_objectID=133. Da kann man auch die Gebäudeumrisse abzeichnen.
george1201 (2023-02-09 17:01:17+00:00): Aber ich glaube, die haben mit ihrem Entwurf den Wettbewerb nicht gewonnen. Die Art der Bebauung ("naher und preiswerter Wohnungsbau") sollte aber nicht verändert worden sein.
maraf24 (2023-02-07 17:20:53+00:00): Wycofane.
maraf24 (2023-02-07 20:36:55+00:00): Drogi rowerowe we Wrocławiu są od dawna zmapowane i to prawidłowo. Proszę więc zostawić je w spokoju.
Famlam (2023-05-21 22:03:23+00:00): Dag André, mag je echt 39km/h rijden op deze weg ;) ? (Zie maxspeed tag)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1138688641
TrekClimbing (2023-02-13 09:30:47+00:00): Hi Olivia
This changeset has some positive additions but a number of changes that don't seem to make sense and there is no explanation in your changeset comment.
Why has Kingsway (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/223530647) been marked as horse=no?
Why has the service road returning from the parking been changed into a track and had its surface tag removed (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/258343829)?
Why has bicycle parking been added in the middle of that track (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10614333048)? 

Thanks
NTTrailsLSE (2023-02-13 12:22:26+00:00): Hi,
Thanks for your comment. You correctly highlighted a digitising mistake RE: horse access on Kingsway - this has been updated. 

RE: way 258344829, the NT ranger felt that track was more appropriate but was not confident that the surface type was correct - happy to be corrected if you are confident in what is on the ground. 

Bicycle parking has been added due to the presence of a bike rack at that site, and following tagging guidance https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bicycle_parking.

Thanks.
TrekClimbing (2023-02-13 18:32:06+00:00): Thanks for your comment and correction. 

Regarding bike parking, I presume it isn't in the middle of the road? i.e. It should be off to one side I imagine. 

I don't know what the on-the-ground situation regarding the track surface but usually one of paved or unpaved should cover it? Or it can be split into different sections? 

Regarding the track/service road, again, I don't know the on the ground situation but a track should be primarily for agricultural vehicles and a service road for access. It may well be a track after the parking (the south-western part) but before then has to be a service road (unless the one ways are also wrong). Another minor point, the section of service road through the parking that is part of the main loop shouldn't be tagged as a parking aisle, that's just for minor offshoots like the one heading NNW-SSE.

Thanks again
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-07 12:30:29+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/138368546
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/304488631

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
SomeoneElse (2023-02-09 22:18:39+00:00): Thanks for updating this (I absolutely don't want to be following an old path over a cliff!) but it looks like you've added the new paths to the wrong relation.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2376086 is the "super relation" - a collection of other relations for the South West Coast Path.  It looks (judging by the hole) like the correct relation to add the new bits of path to would be https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2373766#map=17/50.85710/-4.55422 .
Also, if the legally designated public footpath has moved away from the cliff, then I'd expect https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1035773242 to be more than permissive and have a designation=public_footpath.  Maybe that change hasn't happened yet though?
Any question, please don't hesitate to ask.
Best Regards,
Andy
AWMapper (2023-02-10 16:18:22+00:00): Thanks for your comment.

I've corrected the relation to the South West Coast Path.

I will confirm with Cornwall Council on the status of the alternate route as a Public Footpath and update as necessary.

Kind regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2023-02-26 23:15:38+00:00): Hello,
There's still a bit of a gap in the South West Coast Path relation in this area: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2373766#map=16/50.9214/-4.5497 .  Should that now route over https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1138299551 now?
Best Regards,
Andy
AWMapper (2023-02-27 08:33:46+00:00): Hi Andy,

Sorry, but I have no idea which route the SW Coast path takes at that point as I haven't made any edits there.

Kind regards
SomeoneElse (2023-03-01 11:46:54+00:00): No worries - I just thought that you might have the "inside track" on that!

I'll ask the creator of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1138299551 .
JezCrow (2023-02-08 11:40:56+00:00): Is that definitely the name on the sign - "Cook's" - the website states "Cook"?
aTarom (2023-02-07 15:27:44+00:00): Hola Parie,
en el tag source, por ejemplo en este elemento
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/746478559/history
"source:nl"="Parie 2023 PNOA"
el nombre de usuario, la capa utilizada y la fecha ya quedan reflejados automáticamente en los tags del changeset, por qué duplicar la información? cualquier duda al respecto, o si estoy equivocado en algo, puedes exponerla en la comunidad y debatirla
https://community.openstreetmap.org/
Saludos cordiales y gracias por editar
Tatfahren (2023-02-07 17:13:49+00:00): Hallo LennyW,

Heißt dieses Bekleidungsgeschäft tatsächlich "Bekleidung"?, Das klingt ein wenig verdächtig.

Ansonsten wird der typ mit shop=* angegeben, ich glaube das war shop=clothes.
Nearby0051 (2023-02-22 14:53:04+00:00): Keine Antwort bisher
Revert?
ma-rt-in (2023-08-12 19:20:17+00:00): habe den Namen nun entfernt, da ich eben vor Ort war.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-07 13:20:40+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10614430587
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10614430588
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10614430589
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10614430590
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10614443405
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10614443406
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10614443407
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10614443408
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10614443409
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10614443410

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
syntex (2023-02-07 13:29:32+00:00): Brakujące nazwy dwóch ulic dodane
Herman Lee (2023-02-09 01:51:38+00:00): 您好，您在编辑的时候删除了下峪村的站点关系，希望下次编辑的时候能注意一下，谢谢
literan (2023-02-07 17:36:28+00:00): прибирать за собой надо, или в песочнице тестировать
Luca Moiana (2024-05-03 13:38:47+00:00): Ciao, ho appena notato l'aggiunta della traccia della tramvia Tradate - Saronno, ma ho notato che, nella cartografia di OpenStreetMap, sembra essere presente nonostante sia, ovviamente, una traccia storica. Ho dato un'occhiata alla voce "Tag:route=historic" sulla wiki e sembra che manchino alcuni tag. Potresti aiutarmi a capire come completare correttamente questa informazione? Grazie!
Emanuele Lorenzo Corti (2024-05-04 06:56:31+00:00): Ciao,
purtroppo non so come aiutarti in questo campo, non sono molto afferrato sui tag: mi sono sempre concentrato sulla precisione delle tracce. La Milano-Saronno-Tradate, per giunta, è un percorso difficile da tracciare con adeguata precisione, essendo stata dismessa mezzo secolo prima della Milano-Gallarate. Il massimo che mi capita di indicare, di solito, sono le caratteristiche tecniche e il periodo in cui sia stata operativa.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-07 13:20:41+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/679679397

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
rossomat (2023-02-07 13:26:20+00:00): Rozumiem, że skoro nie ma nawy ulicy (ponieważ w Romaszkach nie ma nazw ulic) oznaczam addr:place ?
NorthCrab (2023-02-07 14:08:17+00:00): Tak, poprawiłeś dobrze. W takich przypadkach możesz sprawdzić jak zostały oznaczone adresy obok. W większości przypadków są one poprawne.
rossomat (2023-02-07 14:12:36+00:00): Dziękuję za zwrócenie uwagi, podpowiedź i wyrozumiałość.
Pozdrawiam.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-07 13:30:29+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10614489494
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10614510021
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10614510022
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10614510023
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10614510024
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10614510025

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
syntex (2023-02-07 13:43:41+00:00): Poprawiłem tą ulicę i adresy przy niej
martien-176 (2023-02-07 14:55:33+00:00): Hi, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. You requested a review of your mappings.

The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location.

Allow me to give some tips on improving your mappings:
- avoid buildings sharing nodes or else overlapping. If buildings need to be adjusted or improved later on, it is much harder to do that if they share nodes with nearby features
- pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon.

Please watch these 2 short video for more info:
-Buildings--> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o
-Roads--> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBLwb2nisJQ

Thanks so much for your contribution, Martien, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132206093
Enock4seth (2023-03-10 08:39:06+00:00): Kindly check for existing features before adding new ones to avoid duplicates like you did here. Fixed now.
AndersAndersson (2023-02-07 19:04:32+00:00): Hej!
Jag tror det blev fel Stinsens väg som blev redigerad. Den du ändrade var en bostadsgata i Borlänge. Jag ändrar tillbaka den.
Säg till om du vill ha hjälp med den andra vägen.
wkdgs (2023-02-08 13:56:27+00:00): Du hast aber "access=yes" gesetzt. Ist das richtig so?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132206173
MOTSM (2023-02-08 14:22:21+00:00): nope, danke, sollte private sein.
martien-176 (2023-02-07 15:06:55+00:00): Hi, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. You requested a review of your mappings.

The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location.

Allow me to give some tips on improving your mappings:
- avoid mapping several buildings as one building. Every building must be traced separately. The humanitarian teams use the size of the buildings to estimate the number of people living there.
- avoid buildings sharing nodes or else overlapping, eg with roads
- pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon.

Please watch these 2 short video for more info:
-Buildings--> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o
-Roads--> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBLwb2nisJQ

Thanks so much for your contribution, Martien, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132206236
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-07 13:40:25+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1030766148

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o miejscowości. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, zastosuj kombinację addr:city + addr:street. Jeśli nie, przekaż nazwę miejscowości w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1030766223

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Branko Kokanovic (2023-02-07 13:36:40+00:00): prema belesci https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3546647
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-07 13:50:29+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10614544972
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10614544983
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10614545004
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10614551705
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10614551726
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10614551736
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10614551743

Pozdrawiam! 🦀