piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
map per (2025-11-09 14:40:15+00:00): Hi Michael Spitzenberger,

der Weiler Isarmünd (1) wurde vor einigen Jahren aufgegeben und die Gebäude abgerissen. Der Ort ist also kein place=hamlet mehr, sondern nur noch place=locality.

Viele Grüße
map per

(1) https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3863695431
silversurfer83 (2025-09-12 20:31:57+00:00): Hi :)

dieser Weg hat nun 
access=no
agricultural=yes
bicycle=yes
motor_vehicle=agricultural

das ist nicht gut.

Kannst du dir das nochmal ansehen und ggf. mal mit der Beschilderung vergleichen?

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171845392
Waldrenner (2025-09-21 16:19:41+00:00): Durchfahrt verboten außer für landwirtschaftlichen Verkehr; also eigentlich müßte es auch Bicycle=no heißen?
silversurfer83 (2025-09-21 16:30:45+00:00): Danke für die Rückmeldung.

Kannst du das genaue VZ nennen? Es gibt 
VZ250
VZ260
oder jede Menge Schilder privater Waldbesitzer wie HessenForst (und und und).

Daher wäre es schon ziemlich relevant, welches Schild hier nun genau steht.
silversurfer83 (2025-10-02 16:02:23+00:00): Hi :)
und?
4004 (2025-09-13 22:57:03+00:00): здравствуйте, спасибо за правку.
а можно спросить, откуда данные по адресу, что именно 3А там?
DoToDo (2025-09-14 18:51:50+00:00): Добрый вечер.
Сотрудники открывающихся ПВЗ сообщают нам эти адреса, если на карте их еще нет, или они добавлены с ошибками.
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-09-12 22:37:06+00:00): Hello, can you please add the tram stop "A" to the appropriate tram relation? I don't see any around the area. Thanks.
Anthrosen (2025-09-12 23:00:44+00:00): Hi, I'm not sure how to do that. I went on site and found the tram stop A shelter. I do not know how to add relations. I do know there are three total stops in the facility.
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-09-13 02:01:17+00:00): Which website did you use? If any object in your view belongs to a relation, you can select an object (like a tram stop), scroll down to the "Relations" section, and type the route's name or ref.
marczoutendijk (2026-01-11 13:01:24+00:00): building:levels=1234
Is that a joke?
Vincent @ (2026-01-11 13:12:14+00:00): error. sorry.
zstadler (2025-11-13 17:19:43+00:00): Hello Tabib1243,

Thank you for your contributions to OSM.

Please avoid deleting on-the-ground elements, such as this cistern.

You are more than welcome to improve the map with additional names.

This deletion was reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174615355
Vinber-Pro (2026-07-01 14:19:26+00:00): bonjour,
tu as passé pas mal de batiments ici en was:building

on ne les voit plus sur l'imagerie, tu es ok pour supprimer totalement ? ou tu es adepte de conserver ?

à plus
XioNoX (2026-07-01 14:27:14+00:00): Yep vas y !
Vinber-Pro (2026-07-01 15:12:37+00:00): fait https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184920345
0xb7767000 (2025-09-13 18:18:00+00:00): Achtung Herzinfarkt für dich ;)
Du hast die Sache mit dem building:part verbockt. Wenn man ein Gebäude mit building:part in seine Einzelteile zerlegt braucht man ein normales building, dass lückenlos mit mehreren building:part ausgefüllt wird.
habi (2025-09-15 06:53:14+00:00): Ciao FASTE
Welcome to OpenStreetMap, it's great to have you in our community.
I agree that this track to the property is private, but deleting all `track` tags is not helpful, as it is visible from aerial imagery.
Looking at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4958989 I immediately wanted to add it to the map again.
It's *much* better to record the details of the track with `access=private`, so no one is going to be routed here, except when they *want* to be routed to the property.
I've added the track back with the relevant details in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171948256
Happy mapping and greetings from the german part of Switzerland,
habi
habi (2025-09-15 06:57:23+00:00): Ciao Faste
Is the name that you've added here an official one, or "only" a locally used one?
In https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171948256 I've undeleted the track and added the private access tags to is, but didn't add the name you've added here.
Habi
user_5359 (2025-09-13 07:51:49+00:00): Hello! Can you please add some footway for the bridge?
iandees (2025-09-12 20:57:06+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Thanks for adding details to the map.

Two important things to point out:
1. Please don't copy from Google Maps. It's against their terms of service and against the rules of OSM. It looks like the details for at least some of the businesses in the commercial park were at least partially copied, given the "GMB" (Google Maps Business) UTM segments in the URL.
2. When we add address information to places, we enter it with the full spelled out name for the street and don't include any abbreviations. Computers are good at abbreviating, so we let them do it for us.

Have a good weekend!
LSWLDN (2025-09-16 20:06:30+00:00): Hi cryptus,
Good to see a contribution to the local area. I believe I was the last user to modify these buildings.

The building for this old pub is still here, the pub building was demolished however it was rebuilt alongside the Watteville House and Emmanuel House redevelopment.

I agree that retaining a point for the old pub tenant (the fountain) probably isn't useful for a map user. Though please may you rollback the deletion of the building itself.

Kind regards, 
LWSLDN
LSWLDN (2025-10-06 18:57:20+00:00): I have reverted this changeset to restore the correct location for SKMA Hapkido & Kummooyeh, and to restore the correct geometry for the empty rebuilt (formerly the Fountain) pub.

Please see further changesets in the comments, to retain the modifications made to the Watchman pub, and to 20 Fairfield South which were correct.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172929875
LSWLDN (2025-10-06 19:04:47+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172929986#map=19/51.398898/-0.255051

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172930128#map=19/51.407518/-0.297687
H-Be (2026-02-25 02:14:12+00:00): Strava's global heatmap shows this is a minimally used path. If most normal people would try to walk this path especially around the end of Citation Drive, they would have a very difficult time. It's very narrow (around 8-10" at most), off camber, and of an unstable dirt. At best it's a very sketchy scramble for experienced trail runners or hikers. At worst it's outright dangerous.
H-Be (2026-02-25 02:15:00+00:00): This is the case regardless of season.
DaveTO (2026-02-25 06:52:08+00:00): > If most normal people would try to walk this path especially around the end of Citation Drive, they would have a very difficult time. It's very narrow (around 8-10" at most), off camber, and of an unstable dirt. At best it's a very sketchy scramble for experienced trail runners or hikers.

It is indeed currently labeled as sac_scale=mountain_hiking. Do you disagree with that?
DaveTO (2026-02-25 06:55:23+00:00): And it is also tagged as an informal diet footway. If you have suggestions for how to tag it more clearly, please go ahead and make the changes. I don't see how it could be made any more specific.
NeisBot (2025-09-12 20:07:05+00:00): Hi N_Inman, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Added benches with wooden material and no armrest or backrest"
AngocA (2025-11-28 15:32:58+00:00): Hola Dani

Desde qué aplicación estabas pidiendo la ruta para llegar a tu casa?
joost schouppe (2025-11-21 10:48:34+00:00): De Corda Arena lijkt al in gebruik, is het gebouw dan nog wel in aanbouw?
joost schouppe (2025-11-21 10:49:47+00:00): Ah woops, tags verkeerd gelezen. Dus het theater is volgens de tags nog niet in gebruik. Op de website valt dat alleszins niet direct op...
Eebie (2025-11-21 15:17:24+00:00): De bouw is in maart stilgelegd. Zie https://www.vrt.be/vrtnws/nl/2025/03/27/bouw-corda-arena-stilgelegd-na-vernietiging-vergunning/  Er is een nieuwe vergunning aangevraagd waarover deze maand november een uitspraak zou gedaan worden https://www.hbvl.be/economie/bouw-van-corda-arena-ligt-nog-zeker-tot-november-stil/87814896.html
Bolbuyk (2026-02-21 19:56:20+00:00): Ik heb het ruiterpad bewandeld en heb nergens een verbod gezien voor wandelaars. Wel een verbod om honden mee te nemen. Pad staat bij de ingang bij Jong Dordrecht met een oranje bord aangeduid als ruiterpad, maar geen officieel verkeersbord.
eggie (2026-02-21 20:05:21+00:00): Hoi..
Volgens mij mag je op een officieel ruiterpad niet wandelen. 
Maar ja.. wat is officieel.
Bij het ruiterpad achter het gemaal stond ook altijd een bordje 'voetgangers verboden'.
Wit met rode rand en het voetgangertje.
Nu zijn ze flink bezig geweest daar in dat gebied. De 'ruiterpaden' hebben allemaal nieuw zand gekregen.
Ze zijn ingericht als ruiterpad.
 Ik denk toch echt dat het niet de bedoeling is om daar te wandelen.
Maar wellicht zijn de borden vervangen?
Zal binnenkort eens kijken.
Groet,
eggie
eggie (2026-02-21 20:11:40+00:00): Tja.. is het een officieel bord?
In het verleden is een beleuring met succes aangevochten voor de rechtbank.
Ik denk dat de ruiterpaden hier beter op foot=no kunnen blijven staan. Ik denk dat het zelfs default is.

https://streetwize.nl/rijles-kennisbank/wegen/paden/ruiterpad/
eggie (2026-02-21 20:15:51+00:00): Volgens de accesstags staat bridleway voor alles op =no behalve ruiters 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#The_Netherlands
eggie (2026-02-21 20:27:19+00:00): Conclusie..  Wanneer je er nu mag wandelen dan zou je dus foot=yes en dog=no moeten toevoegen. Anders zal het per default niet routeren voor wandelaars. 
Zal ook nog eens naar dat andere ruiterpad kijken dat achter het gemaal begint. 
Gr eggie
Bolbuyk (2026-02-21 21:24:45+00:00): Ik durf er ook niet echt mijn handen aan te branden, ik ben er over heen gelopen, de doorsteekjes naar de Nieuwe Merwedeweg zijn sowieso niet voorzien van borden. Er staat geen officieel verkeersbord (rond blauw met ruiter) en uit het verbod op honden maak ik impliciet op dat je er wel zou mogen wandelen. Misschien moet het voor de zekerheid maar getagd blijven zoals het is.
eggie (2026-02-21 21:31:37+00:00): Zal nog wel eens kijken. Die ruiters kunnen natuurlijk ook een hond bij zich hebben. 
Zal wel eens de boswachter aanschieten. 
Volgens mij mogen in het overige gebied geen honden loslopen. In de Louisa en Cannemanspolder mogen ze los, maar met een beperking van het aantal beesten.
LSWLDN (2025-09-16 20:15:44+00:00): Hi cryptus,
Whilst this pub has closed I don't believe the building itself has been demolished.
I see that you have made a lot of contributions regarding removal of pub buildings. Unless the building has been demolished the building itself needs to be retained, with just the building use type changed.

Please can you go through the pubs you have removed and reinstate buildings which have not been demolished, just closed.

Kind regards,
Louis
LSWLDN (2025-10-06 18:56:48+00:00): I have reverted this changeset to restore the correct location for SKMA Hapkido & Kummooyeh, and to restore the correct geometry for the empty rebuilt (formerly the Fountain) pub.

Please see further changesets in the comments, to retain the modifications made to the Watchman pub, and to 20 Fairfield South which were correct.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172929850
LSWLDN (2025-10-06 19:04:56+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172929986#map=19/51.398898/-0.255051

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172930128#map=19/51.407518/-0.297687
PlaneMad (2025-09-14 18:47:51+00:00): Nice, thanks for updating this area
mcliquid (2025-09-14 16:27:57+00:00): Hi and thank you for your contribution!

Please note for the future: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2025-09-14 15:08:28+00:00): الحدود الإدارية تم وضعها حسب البيانات الحكومية، وآخر مصدر مفتوح متاح كان في 2021 من بيانات وزارة الصحة السعودية، نرجوا منكم عدم تغيير تلك الحدود إلا بوجود مصدر بذلك وأيضاً تحتاج لمعرفة التعامل مع العلاقات الحدودية، لذلك أرجوا منكم عدم التعديل عليها واحترام العمل الذي قام به الآخرون لضمان سلامتها !
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2025-09-14 15:09:49+00:00): كما أؤكد بأن الحدود لا تغير بحسب رأي أو خبر بسيط وإنما حسب بيانات واضحة تبين مكان الحدود وأين تبدأ وتنتهي !
d3phunk37 (2025-09-13 03:54:17+00:00): Thanks,  there's a bunch popping up.  I added 3 on the southwest side of town
ratrun (2025-09-14 04:40:36+00:00): Hi,
can you please check the highway classification of your new way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1417856545#map=19/43.173348/13.684269&layers=VN  ?

From the topology of the roundabout I believe that it is not connected to the roundabout on its west end. If this is the case, please add the tag "noexit=yes" on that node and classify the highway type down to "residential". 

In the unlikely case that it is connected with the roundabout, please connect it.

thanks

ratrun
Baloo Uriza (2025-09-13 01:14:20+00:00): First edit jitters, I get it.  So the north building is Circuit360?  What kind of business is this?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171850387
Baloo Uriza (2025-09-13 01:10:24+00:00): Is the email address still circuit360okc@gmail.com?
Is the phone number still +1 813 444 5879?
Also be aware that the name tag should only contain the name, not the branch.  There's a branch tag for that.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171850458
El ArquiPachuca (2025-09-12 20:49:49+00:00): QUEDO BONITO
eggie (2025-09-13 09:13:15+00:00): Alle woonstraten zijn inderdaad residential... soms living_street bij woonerfbebording.
Doorgaande straten hoger. 

Bij de import in 2007 vanuit de data van AND (donatie van kaartenmaker over heel nederland) kenden we alleen nog de smaak van unclassified. 
Dus dit zul je nog vaak tegenkomen.
Gr eggie
aceman444 (2025-12-28 10:05:47+00:00): Zdravim, je tam ta 110 trvalo, alebo sa tam vrati obmedzenie na 110 km/h len cez den, ako na ostatnych usekoch D1?
mapko (2025-12-28 13:32:19+00:00): Zdravim. Aktualne je tam 100, ale este nie vsetko znacenie je trvale.
infeeeee (2025-09-14 13:17:57+00:00): Szia! Üdv az OpenStreetMapen!

Az út törlése ilyen esetben nem jó megoldás, mert jöhet utánad valaki, aki visszarajzolja majd műholdképről. Ilyenkor az út magán részére egy access=private címkét kell rakni. 

Ezt javítottam itt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171917387

Ha kérdésed merülne fel, a magyar szerkesztő közösség elérhetőségeit megtalálod ezen az oldalon: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hungary/Közösség#Elérhetőségek

További jó térképezést!
inserteunnombreaqui (2025-09-12 21:23:55+00:00): waos.... estoy cansado XD
eggie (2025-09-13 08:54:12+00:00): Dag Karel,

residential inderdaad gebruiken coor woonstraten...  Doorgaande wegen hebben vaak wel een hogere wegklasse.
surface=paved is algemeen. Probeer  specifiek te taggen.. Bv paving_stones of asphalt e.d. 
Bij Silene 54 eindigt een fietspad op een voetpad. Dat routeert niet. 

Mapse
eggie
eggie (2025-09-13 09:03:17+00:00): Opgelost met klein stukje highway=path ipv footway.
user_5359 (2025-09-13 14:30:38+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/297290339. What is the mean of the tag w = Delgerkhaan, Khentii aimag, Mongolia ?
silversurfer83 (2025-09-13 08:29:54+00:00): Hi :)

bei Ladestationen ist der Stecker oder die Buchse wesentlich interessanter als "motor_car" oder "hgv". Wenn ich den passenden Stecker habe und die Ladestation genug Leistung liefert, lade ich da alles, was ich will ;)

Abgesehen davon hast du bei einer deiner beiden Stationen die Bezahlung auf die membership_card rediziert. Bist du sicher, dass es an einer öffentlichen Station nicht möglich ist per Kreditkarte über eine Website zu zahlen? Das ist eigentlich Vorschrift.

Grüße
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171853157
Kraan46 (2025-09-13 15:56:55+00:00): None of your mappings was squared: After drawing the outline and tagging as a building, use the 'Q' key in the iD web editor to "square" the corners.

All your mappings were oversized. The humanitarian teams use the size of the buildings to estimate the number of people living there. This helps them to work out the approximate total population in the area and how much equipment or medication to bring with them. Buildings that are too big do not fit in with these calculations and lead to inaccuracies in the population count.

Fixed all. Please take care in the future.
eggie (2025-09-15 13:05:53+00:00): Zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Doutdoor_seating

Meer bedoeld voor openbaren horeca terrassen. Niet in tuinen gaan mappen.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-09-15 16:10:19+00:00): Ik heb het terras verwijderd.

MVG
eggie
Moiety (2025-09-15 16:59:30+00:00): Duidelijk, zal het de volgende keer achterwegen laten.
Baloo Uriza (2025-09-13 01:09:24+00:00): Thanks for the update!  You can find more that hasn't been updated recently in the StreetComplete app on Android and iOS.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171854290
citrula (2025-09-13 19:56:15+00:00): please don't use descriptive names like "Grassy area" - not every object needs a name!

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-09-13 10:55:18+00:00): Hi! Please don't change geometry on highway transitions. These are following the wiki and are standardized for the whole Montreal region (Quebec soon) and aligned on theoritical gore. I will revert. Thanks! https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:placement%3Dtransition
ika-chan! (2025-09-13 22:24:32+00:00): The way the motorway exit is placed and tagged is fine: please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:placement%3Dtransition on how it works.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171895681
SpeedMcCool (2025-09-14 19:59:36+00:00): Hi! Why was this changeset reverted? As far as I'm aware, all the data I entered was correct.
UnusualWorld (2025-09-14 20:50:46+00:00): It's on a very large scale and wasn't checked, your "as far as I'm aware", reiterates that, you didn't check anything and there is a fair number as wrong entries and probably many more.
SpeedMcCool (2025-09-15 00:11:04+00:00): These have all either been a. verified by outside sources or b. are obvious from the context (for example, the Massachusetts Turnpike is clearly names after Massachusetts.) I would appreciate if you would undo this reversion.

The large scale is not a choice I made, but a side effect of MapComplete's process of saving edits. In the future, I will try to avoid this, but to revert this whole changeset for that reason is unnecessary.
Gabe DeFreitas (2025-09-15 04:12:04+00:00): The tag being updated was not "wikidata" but rather "name:etymology:wikidata". Therefore, the linked entity should be the namesake of the feature rather than the feature itself. The only example you gave of incorrect data was "Tide Street". However, as that street is located adjacent to Boston Harbor and in a neighborhood with other marine-themed names, it seems clear that it was in fact named after the tide, that is the rise and fall of sea levels. I reviewed many of the entries and could not find any errors to suggest that the tag is being applied incorrectly. Some of the entries clearly show that the user was manually reviewing the information, for example East Stadium Boulevard is correctly linked to Michigan Stadium in Ann Arbor MI. Another is Soldiers Field Road in Boston, which is linked to Harvard's soccer stadium Jordan Field, which has a former name of Soldiers Field. In my opinion, this changeset contains a lot of useful information that should not be thrown out solely because MapComplete bundled it into a large bbox
UnusualWorld (2025-09-15 12:21:50+00:00): Okay, I understand, yeah the MapComplete over the large bbox made me think this is some sort of just somebody spam clicking accepting some sort of automated change. I reverted the revert in changeset 171963201
Jacksonville (2025-09-13 22:58:19+00:00): You can either send me a PM about this, or we keep having this exchange, and I will continue to restore my edits. You have no basis. You are basing this on your own opinions, not on Ground sources which is what OSM is built up.
Jacksonville (2025-09-13 23:00:08+00:00): What will certainly not happen is you attempting to call other users dishonest, and think that you can bully your way through it.
Jacksonville (2025-09-13 23:02:53+00:00): Alternatively, I will bring in a mediator to solve this. But, the current edits remain, because it adds information whereas you are attempting to remove them.
RLakhani (2025-09-13 23:03:46+00:00): What you’re doing is a total lie. This is not a town by any stretch of the imagination. You’re insisting on categorizing a temple as a town so that it shows up prominently in a map. Please bring a mediator on and restore the map to how it was before you decided to miss categorize us as a town
RLakhani (2025-09-13 23:04:17+00:00): by the way, adding more inaccurate information doesn’t help the map.
Jacksonville (2025-09-13 23:05:18+00:00): Also it has a Wikidata tag, so you cannot remove the node because it affects Wikimedia sites as well.
RLakhani (2025-09-13 23:05:20+00:00): You don’t get to just decide that the edits will remain. I will revert them back if I wish as well. This is an open street map, it does not belong to Jacksonville or me.
RLakhani (2025-09-13 23:07:15+00:00): Wiki tags do not make something permanent.  You were still miss categorizing this as a town, which is the underlying problem. Not breaking wiki tags. Those tags do not determine accuracy when arial imagery makes it very clear that this is not a town
Jacksonville (2025-09-14 22:41:38+00:00): Again when you accuse people of lying or decieving, you are doing nothing to solve the issue, but make it worse.

I have asked you to come to PM, you have not messaged. This is a town. Youc an argue about its classification but you are being obnoxious by name calling and just evidently not trying to understand the underlying issue.
RLakhani (2025-09-15 19:54:26+00:00): You keep expressing a desire to miscategorize a temple as a town - I've heard various reasons from this is actually a town, to it has wikidata, to it needs to be found this way. None of this amounts to justification for mistagging it. My point is extremely simple - this is *not* a town. 

And you said you'd call in a mediator. Let me know when you do an I'll respond there.
RLakhani (2025-09-15 19:57:41+00:00): As I said, you can maybe argue this is a locality. It doesnt meet definition of a town by any stretch the imagination - although you earlier were trying to make that point. If you cannot see what is plainly obvious from satellite imagery - that there is now town here - then I dont see a resolution.
CodentGIS (2025-09-13 23:02:04+00:00): Hey there!

I highly suggest you look at this changeset comment from @seav: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171004943#map=10/16.7802/121.9922

We're not actually allowed to use the data from NAMRIA.
2Louie (2025-09-14 00:48:05+00:00): Thank you for pointing that out. I am new and practicing mapping, I wasn't aware that NAMRIA source is not allowed. If necessary I will revert or delete the edits i made and could you recommend the proper source i should use instead?