piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NorthCrab_upload (2024-09-23 19:31:00+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12195402811

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eggie (2024-09-23 19:32:28+00:00): Hoi acirep,

Een parking_space is één parkeervak.

De tagging voor de strook is een vlak met de tags
amenity=parking
parking=street_side
orientation=parallel

Daarin teken je dan vier vakken
amenity=parking_space

Ik zal eentje aanpassen als voorbeeld.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-09-23 19:36:22+00:00): Mijn aanpassing...  laden zal wel even tijd kosten.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=157011083
Paar keer CTRL-F5 zal ook wel helpen hier 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/51.945000/4.437752
eggie (2024-09-23 19:38:06+00:00): Dat gekke foutje van die shop is er al uit.
eggie (2024-09-23 19:41:31+00:00): De school kun je mappen op het school terrein  of op de adresnode als deze al geopend is.
amenity=school
name=Basisschool Park16Hoven
acirep (2024-09-24 18:21:32+00:00): Tweaked it based on your comments eggie, here is new changeset
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157052102
acirep (2024-09-24 18:21:56+00:00): Hope I did parking good now, just started doing this so lots of things to learn. Thanks for your patience!
Fizzie-DWG (2025-02-17 04:19:25+00:00): DWG revert - poor quality

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162595039
eggie (2024-09-23 19:47:35+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Kennelijk verdwijnt een gebouw onder een platform.  Als het een gebouwtjes is is er wel een trucje om het zichtbaar te maken. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Sebas3 (2024-09-23 19:54:31+00:00): Dank voor de introductie en welkomstbericht! Het is een wachtruimte op het perron. Niet echt een gebouw dus.
eggie (2024-09-23 20:02:39+00:00): Oke...
eggie (2024-09-23 20:02:12+00:00): Kijk anders even bij andere kaartjesapparaten of er NS staat of de naam voluit.
Nu is het niet consistent. 
gr eggie
Sebas3 (2024-09-23 20:20:49+00:00): Gedaan, naar voorbeeld van Amsterdam Centraal.
eggie (2024-09-23 20:22:55+00:00): Up to you 😀
cuzi (2024-10-18 08:58:14+00:00): Hi, du hast hier einen Weg über die Straße und die Einfahrt eingetragen:  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1317688727
Jemand hat einen Hinweis geschrieben, dass der Weg nicht existiert. Auf Mapillary Bildern sieht es für mich auch so aus. Kannst du das korrigieren oder dich an dem Hinweis beteiligen, siehe: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4482859
ivanbranco (2024-09-26 22:16:54+00:00): Hi Bekudio,

I saw you added roof:levels=1.8 and then =1.2
the wiki for roof:levels says "Value should be a positive or zero integer: 0, 1, 2, etc." and then
"do not use fractional values but height tags."
Could you fix such occurences?
Bekudio (2024-09-27 15:19:25+00:00): 1. It's for 3D with F4 and runs well.
2. JOSM does not display a warning when using roof:levels=1.2. However, there is a warning when using building:levels=1.2. So I didn't tag building:levels with a float.
3. For the future I will tag with tag with  height and roof:height.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-12 02:20:05+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164838748
NorthCrab_upload (2024-09-23 20:31:21+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1317695323

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
woodpeck (2024-09-23 23:37:47+00:00): Dear MiguelMindiolac, please don't create residential areas with a name of "NOMBRE". Please also make a resdiential area at least encompass the whole building block - don't make mini residential areas for every building!
AntMadeira (2024-09-23 21:38:06+00:00): Olá, RuiM.
Reparei que nesta edição do mapa, alteraste fronteiras administrativas.
As fronteiras administrativas atuais e antigas são limites oficiais e estão mapeadas segundo uma padronização nacional, pelo que não devem ser alteradas.
Para mais informações, aconselho a leitura:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Portugal/Padroniza%C3%A7%C3%A3o#Antigas_freguesias_e_fronteiras_hist%C3%B3ricas

Irei reverter esta alteração. 
Qualquer dúvida, estão ao dispor para tentar esclarecer, por aqui ou no canal nacional de OpenStreetMap no Telegram:
https://t.me/OSMPortugal

Cumprimentos,
António Madeira.
Grass-snake (2024-10-05 17:12:33+00:00): Здравствуйте, уточните пожалуйста, что это за место? Эти дороги и адреса существуют или только проектируются? По сравнению с ПКК нарисовано очень криво.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/58.62599/50.11330
Kirov01243 (2024-10-07 09:04:28+00:00): Это проектируемые улицы. Нарисованы примерно исходя из нумерации в ПКК.
Grass-snake (2024-10-07 17:20:26+00:00): Если улицы ещё проектируются (строительство не началось), то нужно указывать highway=proposed.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:highway%3Dproposed

Если строительство началось, то указывайте highway=construction.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:highway%3Dconstruction

Замените пожалуйста на правильные теги.
Grass-snake (2024-10-09 04:23:58+00:00): Дополнение: к зданиям это тоже относится: если здание даже не начали строить, то указывайте proposed:building=yes, если уже начали строить, то building=construction.
Fizzie-DWG (2024-09-23 23:11:57+00:00): Hello Zoe, & welcome to OSM. Please limit your edits to small areas, rather than worldwide!, as doing that makes it very hard for other mappers to follow what you have done. Thanks
Gregory Peony (2024-11-06 23:36:03+00:00): you added WAY: 1317698387 over an existing years old building. If you are using fillters do so with care, check that you aren't hiding mapping errors if they pop-up diring data upload. Some footprints like WAY: 1317698388 are oversized because they include the (white) eastern wall visible in off nadir imagery. Thank you for your contribution, hope this helps.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157012768
streckenkundler (2024-09-23 20:40:00+00:00): Ergänzend, da Textfeld nicht ausreichte: zugleich Einpflegen  des damit hier korrespondierenden LSG (beide sind lagegleich, aner unterschiedliche Werte und Namen)
Abgleich Schutzgebiete anderer Bundesländer, die an der jeweiligen Landesgrenze enden, müssen in einem weiteren Schritt geschehen So auch die brandenburgischen NSG's
Fragen bitte an den genannten Beitragsfaden im Forum stellen...

Danke, streckenkundler
mgerken (2024-09-24 09:27:45+00:00): Moin,

wie auch von anderen im letzten Jahr schon angemerkt: Es wäre sehr nett, wenn du die Wikidata tags nicht einfach bei jedem node kommentarlos löscht.
Mir ist bewusst, dass du sie für nicht notwendig erachtest, aber das ist kein Grund die Arbeit anderer zu entfernen, solange die Tags korrekt sind.

Beste Grüße
OSM_RogerWilco (2024-09-23 20:51:44+00:00): Moin BennyOtt,

willkommen bei OSM! Schön, dass Du mitmachst und herzlichen Glückwunsch zu Deiner ersten Änderung!

Eine grundsätzliche Bitte: Bitte gebe aussagekräftige Änderungskommentare an. "Kleine Änderungen" sind nicht besonders aussagekräftig, damit andere verstehen, was Du und warum geändert hast. Gebe außerdem bitte Deine Quelle für Deine Änderungen mit an.

Siehe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

In diesem Sinne: Happy Mapping! :-)

Viele Grüße
Roger Wilco
jpennycook (2024-10-19 16:27:55+00:00): Hi!

First of all, can you add a proper changeset comment rather than just "Updated", please?  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6106777034
junction=yes is not useful unless the junction has a name - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction=yes?uselang=en-GB

Jon
eggie (2024-09-24 04:46:15+00:00): Tip.. evt kun je waar ze bezig zijn een vlak maken met landuse=construction. Dat voorkomt dan opnieuw intekenen van de oude situatie.
Mapse
dankarran (2024-09-24 14:14:28+00:00): Interestingly, the entrances from the avenues on the south each still have the following notice up:

===
This Route is a
PERMISSIVE FOOTPATH

This means thats:
1. You are invited to use this path for walking.
2. It is not intended that this route should ever become a public right of way.
3. The path may be closed on a temporary or permanent basis at any time in the future if the owners so wish.
4. Vehicles, motorcycles and cycles are not permitted to use this route.
5. This sign constitutes a notice in accordance with the Highways Act 1980, Section 51 (5).

Britannia Village (General Residents)
Management Company Ltd
rskedgell (2024-09-24 23:20:03+00:00): Is there an OSM-compatible source for which (if any) of the streets in Britannia Village have since been adopted by Newham?
dankarran (2024-09-25 13:58:04+00:00): Not OSM friendly (but presumably fine for occasional reference under fair use) I have just discovered the Newham Personal Search Highways Map

https://www.newham.gov.uk/planning-development-conservation/local-land-charges-searches/6

It shows it as a permissive path still, not adopted highway.
NeisBot (2024-09-23 21:28:48+00:00): Hello Yohan Plum, welcome to OSM, and thank you for your contributions!

I've taken a look at your recent edits and wanted to discuss a few discrepancies I noticed regarding the surrounding environmental features. Specifically, the locations in your edits don't seem to align with the typical geographical characteristics expected in that area. Here are some (max 10) relevant links to the edits:
https://osm.org/node/12195588261

Could you please take a look?
Looking forward to your response.

#Somewhere
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=157014189
Yohan Plum (2024-09-24 03:46:50+00:00): Hello, Neisbot. Thanks for informing me. I checked and you were correct. It was an offset and should not have been there. Someone had also made an edit to the proper location on the map. I am deleting my edit. By the way, which other edits are you referring to? Thank you very much!
pitscheplatsch (2024-09-24 05:13:14+00:00): Hi Yohan Plum, thank you for your answer and your revert.

Your changeset only has one edit, so there can't be any more here.
Nakaner (2024-09-25 07:33:24+00:00): Hi,

it seems to me that you mechanically apply suggestions to correct things in OpenStreetMap. Where do you receive these instructions from? Who instructs you?

Please answer these questions before you continue editing.

Best regards

Michael
Badojo (2024-09-25 08:27:06+00:00): These changes are all manual and done by myself. I changed the crossing tags to reflect that they are let crossing tram instead of rails and fixed railway=stop to railway=tram_stop tags.
silversurfer83 (2024-09-27 20:15:59+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap

danke, dass du hilfst die Karte aktuell zu halten.

Kleiner Hinweis: Du hast der Zisterne hier auch die Eigenschaft "reservoir covered" gegeben. Das ist idR ein sogen. Hochbehälter. Passt das hier?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:man_made%3Dreservoir_covered

bei Fragen immer raus damit und weiter viel Spaß an der Karte
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157014474
silversurfer83 (2024-10-08 18:10:59+00:00): Hi
hast du meine Nachricht gelesen?
DiogoBaptista98 (2026-01-11 03:03:07+00:00): não é ciclovia
Telegram Sam (2026-01-12 16:48:37+00:00): my bad
Hopla57 (2025-02-10 18:39:51+00:00): Bonjour GPS-Hobby 600,

Concernant l'église Saint-Pierre-aux-Nonnains (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/34112636), vous avez fait une petite erreur : ce n'est plus un lieu de culte, elle a été désacralisée et est maintenant une salle de spectacle. Le tag "amenity=theatre" était donc correct. Pouvez-vous le rétablir ?

De plus, la fontaine de l'Esplanade est déjà indiquée (sous forme de surface).

Bien cordialement.
Hopla57 (2025-02-11 20:51:10+00:00): Hallo GPS-Hobby 600,

In Bezug auf die Kirche Saint-Pierre-aux-Nonnains (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/34112636) ist Ihnen ein kleiner Fehler unterlaufen: Sie ist kein Gotteshaus mehr, sondern wurde entweiht und ist nun ein Veranstaltungsort. Der Tag „amenity=theatre“ war daher korrekt. Können Sie ihn wiederherstellen?

Außerdem ist der Brunnen auf der Esplanade bereits angegeben (in Form einer Fläche).

Mit freundlichen Grüßen.


Übersetzt mit DeepL.com (kostenlose Version)
Ferrocarriles de México (2025-02-24 20:16:51+00:00): Descompusiste el nombre de los ríos. Revertido.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162907703
Xvtn (2024-09-25 22:15:13+00:00): I see that you added layer=-1 to this school building, meaning that it's underground. Was that intentional?
EzyPup (2024-09-26 04:03:36+00:00): Hi Xvtn, I am fairly new to open streetmap and am still figuring things out, no this is not intentional it was an accident, the school is not underground.
EzyPup (2024-09-28 04:35:06+00:00): I have now fixed it, the layer is back to 0
Glassman (2024-09-24 15:10:20+00:00): #TIP - add the gate to the track to let everyone know where it is. add barrier=gate.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157017985
Xvtn (2024-09-25 22:13:51+00:00): Did they add physical barriers to these intersections recently?
EzyPup (2024-09-26 04:05:05+00:00): Yes, I'm not sure exactly how long ago, but they added a raised median.
Xvtn (2024-09-27 13:24:01+00:00): Oh, gotcha. Thanks! I didn't know they had separated out the turning lanes eg  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1317734951 .
Xvtn (2024-11-07 20:59:38+00:00): I came through here the other day, and saw that there are no physical barriers separating most of the turn lanes in this area. Specifically I'm referring to things like this: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1317734950

But, I could still be wrong. Ezra, are you sure there's a physical barrier separating the turn lanes specifically on and off of 1100 South?
EzyPup (2024-11-13 01:23:44+00:00): Hi Xvtn when I made these changes I did get some of the turn lanes wrong on 1100 south. They did add a median on Comerce way, Highway 89, & Brigham's Main street. However I also incorectly seperated the turn lanes on 1100 south that are  just paint and not a median. when i responded  thought you were talking about the raised medians that do exsist. It should be fixed now & only be seperated where it actualy is. Changeset: 159073282
woodpeck (2024-09-24 12:33:20+00:00): Dear Luis Manjarrez, please do not create "city blocks" that have the size of a single building. Please do not call these blocks "Valep", that is not the correct name.
Luis Manjarrez (2024-09-24 12:40:31+00:00): Hi there! This won't keep like this, we are making a project for our architecture career, but In fact, that blocks called "Valep" is not mine, yes i changed some things of that blocks but these are not made by me, also we are gonna change it.
woodpeck (2024-10-13 21:48:24+00:00): Please fix the data urgently. There are still lots of objects tagged place=city_block and building=* at the same time, there are lots of industrial landuses named "0", lots of buildings named "casa", lots of objects tagged "place=plot". I will remove this data if it is not cleaned up.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-06 04:11:05+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164574113
fs_LT (2024-09-24 07:14:05+00:00): Servus,
darf ich fragen warum du das Gebäude/Hotel komplett gelöscht und dann wieder neu angelegt hast? Im Sinne  des Lifecycle wäre es besser das vorhandene Objekt zu bearbeiten. Zudem sind nun viel weniger Infos vorhanden als zuvor?
divaddivag (2024-09-26 09:44:00+00:00): Pour infos il s'agit d'une boucle au départ du Pont de Ranville->Cabourg->Robehomme->Bavent: tu l'a panoramaxée en avril 2023 ! Il n'y a pas de raisons à ce qu'elle ne figure pas dans sa totalité si les numéros sont constatés sur le terrain. J'ai une petite idée pourquoi Calvados Attractivité la tronquée sur son site ou le matériel promotionnel... A+ D
Nzau (2024-09-27 17:54:35+00:00): Ah génial, si tu as le gpx en entier ou le nombre de km, je suis preneur.
A +
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-17 03:40:49+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165052370
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-13 02:03:47+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164877166
Lepuse (2024-11-08 17:23:47+00:00): Have you ever looked at the satellite image during the so-called fix? There are three islands connected into one and the names of each island are retained. Any of the place=island as inner is incorrect.
vojtechzaboril (2024-09-24 06:07:58+00:00): Hi, did you verified the existence of speed camera?
ceyu (2024-09-24 06:15:33+00:00): No, the only source is this note: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4449471
vojtechzaboril (2024-09-24 06:20:30+00:00): But the note clearly says “please verify”. I wasnt able to verify the existence of speed camera, so I made this note hoping someone will check it in reality.

So please delete the speed camera from OSM (because you didnt verified it) and also reactivate the note.

(Generally do not add information from notes without verifying)

Regards and thanks
vojtechzaboril (2024-09-24 07:38:59+00:00): Hi, i reverted (deleted) the added speed_camera (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157025730) as it clearly wasn't verified.
citrula (2024-09-30 16:17:58+00:00): This looks good to me. Thanks for the fix!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157020174
Azharul Islam Anik (2024-09-24 08:01:58+00:00): #APHub #WVBD #map4climate #map4climatedhaka
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157020608
Natfoot (2024-09-27 20:18:09+00:00): Hey sctrojan,
Please resurvey. 
One of the intersections marked with oneway is a left turn onto West bound 520.
sctrojan79 (2024-09-28 01:45:39+00:00): Thanks for the head up – updated that turn.
sctrojan79 (2024-09-28 01:46:02+00:00): Changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157192738
emersonveenstra (2024-09-24 10:03:09+00:00): Hi,

Why did you remove the address?
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-06 03:52:22+00:00): Because they are a SEO spammer ;)
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-06 03:52:49+00:00): Reverted inexplicable removal of all address tags, adjusted POI position to be more approximately correct, and cleaned up remaining SEO spam tags for Two Men and a Truck POI in Comstock Park in changeset 183721372

https://osm.org/changeset/183721372
tyfi (2024-09-24 05:35:25+00:00): There are 8 locations operated by SVdP STL and 1 national store operated by SVDP USA involved in this changeset.
tyfi (2024-09-24 05:37:07+00:00): I also untagged the former Lemay store location since they moved a little bit northeast to another shopping center in the same general area.
TrickyFoxy (2024-10-21 17:46:40+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158181231
canfe (2026-04-24 08:28:33+00:00): access = yes vuol dire che ci può entrare chiunque, anche i TIR
NieWnen (2024-09-24 18:48:56+00:00): O dobrze, że usunęli ten bubel. Jak tamtędy jechałem wyglądało o tak: 
https://imgur.com/a/ijIqEPL

Skorygowałem tagowanie CPRa.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157053054
NieWnen (2025-10-25 17:40:48+00:00): Ten znak znów się pojawił :/ 

Przywróciłem: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173766429
NieWnen (2024-09-24 18:39:32+00:00): To tam wystarczy zwykły chodnik :)

Jest tam może przejazd pieszo-rowerowy? Czy zwykłe przejście dla pieszych?
Grzegorz Madrjas (2024-09-24 18:50:31+00:00): W poprzek Warszawskiej? Zwykłe przejście.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-09-24 21:51:16+00:00): reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157058159
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-09-24 09:23:33+00:00): On 2024-09-24 07:24:24 UTC Blixt99 wrote:

> I've already complained to the OSM administrators about your abuses. All of the mapping corrections I make are to golf courses I play or have played in my life. If I claim that a fairway does not encircle a green I am not lying as you falsely claim.
> If you go to the website of the Sandpiper Golf Club in Goleta, California and look at the pictures of the course you can plainly see that the closely mown fairways do not encircle the green. Since you obviously don't play golf, let me educate you about the layout of the golf holes. There is the closely mown fairway which goes right up to the front of the green. Each fairway has a light rough fringe or first cut as it's called and then the heavy rough. Each green has a closely mown putting surface plus a slightly longer grass fringe and then the heavy rough. The area you see in the OSM editor surrounding the greens looks like it may be fairway but it is not fairway, but is actually the  fringe area. It may look like the fairway is going around green from the satellite photo of the course but that is not the case. Once again, look at photos of the course and you will see that this is the case. Whoever mapped this course originally was incorrect and probably made this false conclusion without having actually played the course or looked at the course photos. There is absolutely no closely mown fairway surrounding each green as can be seen from the photos of the greens on the website. There are some courses that may have greens surrounded by fairway and mapping them the way you seem to insist would be correct, but I have never played a course that does.
> 
> Please stop your harassment or I will do whatever it takes to stop your harassment. Just because I'm mapping for use in my golf game course creation editor does not mean I am lying about the actual layout of the course features. 
>
CurlingMan13 (2024-09-25 19:12:52+00:00): All conversations in regarda ti a changeset should be made on their respective changeset, and not private messages.

Make sure you report the user to the DWG, as appropriate.  I have previously had issues with similar and poor changesets on goof courses.
gscholz (2024-09-30 10:04:57+00:00): Hi Davidsurikovich,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting and displaced ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=37.28642&lat=47.05780&zoom=17&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=157024130

I have reverted this changeset to fix those issues. Please edit more  carefully.

Kind regards
Guido
habi (2024-09-24 07:28:20+00:00): Ciao Glira_CH
Der Spielplatz hier *heisst* nicht Spielplatz, sondern *ist* ein Spielplatz.
Ich habe den Namen entfernt, das `leisure=playground` beschreibt schon gut genut, dass es ein Spielplatz ist.
Gruss,
habi
Joseph R P (2024-09-30 22:16:16+00:00): Hello, I have reverted this section of Briley Parkway that you have upgraded to motorway back to trunk. The motorway tags should only be used on freeways like Interstates or the remainder of Briley Parkway which is up to freeway standards.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157316163
pyram (2024-11-24 20:45:44+00:00): Review:
Looks like nice work ;-)

(I added some buildings around to show more details and fixed opening_hours - see https://openingh.ypid.de/evaluation_tool/ )