piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisReview (2026-02-27 05:33:18+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/178802061
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2026-02-20 17:27:01+00:00): J'ai ajouté l'entrée principale. Par contre, ce point créait un duplicat avec l'amenity hospital déjà défini par le polygone, que j'ai retiré.
martin hamel (2026-02-20 17:45:14+00:00): J'avoue être confondu par ce point. Rien ne nomme l'hôpital Marie-Clarac. C'est pour ça que je l'ai mis. Sur la carte, il y a Marie-Clarac sur le fond de carte. Mais j'utilise l'editeur web. Je n'y voit rien. Qu'est-ce qui affiche le nom ?  Je l'ai ajouté parce que sur véloinfo il n'était pas trouvé dans la recherche. 

Je suis curieux de comprendre la situation.
martin hamel (2026-02-20 17:59:28+00:00): Je viens de trouver le polygone en question. Je vais refaire ma table de noms pour qu'elle le prenne on compte. 

Désolé pour le dérangement
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2026-02-20 18:17:36+00:00): Oui, c'est le polygone du terrain. C'est souvent le cas pour les écoles et les hôpitaux de nommer le lieu sur le polygone complet. Ça peut aussi être un multipolygone dans certains cas.
NeisBot (2026-02-19 01:39:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/10628342889 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "solar panel installation"

#MapWithoutSpam
nevw (2026-02-19 02:44:28+00:00): Hi, you need to place your business location at the office you operate your business from. Both your additions are located incorrectly on the street and different from the website address. The name of your business is ‘Aussie Hybrid Solar’ on your website which is not the name you added to these two.
zuicz (2026-02-25 12:06:08+00:00): incorrect change, it's not a highway
Mashin (2026-02-19 08:26:33+00:00): Hi,
this all seem good. I just added lane_markings=no.

In your other changes I fixed phone number format to +1-203-XXX-YYYY

Thanks for your edits!
kudomenagi (2026-02-19 22:30:02+00:00): OpenStreetMapに情報を追加してくださりありがとうございます。2点お伝えしたいことがあり、ご連絡いたしました。

変更セットのコメントは「少なくとも動詞（どのように変更したか）と対象（何を変更したか）を含んでいて、さらに編集した場所と使用した情報源」を記載することが望ましいとされています (参照: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:%E5%A4%89%E6%9B%B4%E3%82%BB%E3%83%83%E3%83%88%E3%81%AE%E8%89%AF%E3%81%84%E3%82%B3%E3%83%A1%E3%83%B3%E3%83%88 )。今回のようにパン屋の名称の修正を行われた場合は、「地元の知識をもとに、西蒲区のパン屋の名称を修正」といったようなコメントを付けるとより良い編集になります。特に情報源が記載されていないと、変更が差し戻される可能性があります。

また、今回の編集では、無関係な道路も編集されています (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1143866489/history/2 )。おそらくiDで編集する際に、意図せず道路のノードを動かしてしまったことが原因なのだと思われます。変更を保存する際に変更されたものを再確認することで、意図しない編集を防ぐことができます。
AngocA (2026-02-19 03:06:07+00:00): Hola Germán
Una corrección en Colombia no hay Toll_gantry, sino toll_booth.
felipeeugenio (2026-02-19 12:28:12+00:00): Hola. Esos definitivamente no son bosques.
Por favor contestar los mensajes de parte de la comunidad o incoporarse al chat al que fue invitado. Gracias. Las ediciones serán corregidas.

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178750995
JJIglesias (2026-02-19 07:22:50+00:00): Slds. los tags Fixme=XXX NO SE BORRAN a menos que se haya CORREGIDO lo que indica tal tag.

En este caso habia fixme=Resurvey_geometry para la via D619. QUE NO DEBISTE BORRAR.

TODOS los Tags estan por diferentes razones, NO SE BORRAN solo por gusto. Cualquier futuro borrado innecesario, provocara que REVIERTA  ese cambio y se pierda toda tu edición, para ese Changeset.

Gracias
athlus (2026-02-19 13:02:47+00:00): Mil disculpas, estaba leyendo eso e investigando pero no fue mi intención borrar, si algo no entiendo por lo general lo dejo así. Tendre mas cuidado en el futuro.
JJIglesias (2026-02-19 17:31:52+00:00): No hay problema, solo ten más atención. sería bueno q al editar actives todas las alertas por errores donde estes editando. Es la parte del menu a la derecha que dice ISSUES. y colocas el Check=Everything y Where=Everywhere.

Y así te mostrara los errores que existen y los que cometiste también. La calidad del Mapa depende mucho que esos errores se CORRIJAN lo mas posible.

Gracias
Maradona11 (2026-02-19 03:42:20+00:00): added peaks in Fjardabyggd area
NeisBot (2026-02-19 04:15:39+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 10 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/302368293 v2 | 4 crossings
https://osm.org/way/302713607 v2 | 4 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/5846696247 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178751741
NeisReview (2026-02-27 05:33:19+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/178805281
NeisBot (2026-02-19 04:36:35+00:00): 🌍 Bienvenida a OSM, Karlaaaa09.
Gracias por contribuir.

Para hacer que la colaboración sea más fácil y ayudar a los demás a entender tus ediciones, es mejor agregar una breve descripción de los cambios que hiciste. Los comentarios claros ayudan a la comunidad a seguir tu trabajo y a proporcionar mejores comentarios. Puedes encontrar consejos para escribir buenos comentarios aquí[1].

✅ Aquí hay un comentario de ejemplo basado en tus ediciones del mapa: "Agregué parque con nombre "cobach 10""
(Auto-translation)
---
🌍 Welcome to OSM, Karlaaaa09.
Thanks for contributing!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

✅ Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added park with name "cobach 10""
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish
NeisBot (2026-02-19 04:30:39+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 50 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/226735049 v7 | 16 crossings
https://osm.org/way/375790369 v4 | 13 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1480491791 v1 | 5 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/3791338739 v4

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178752102
NeisRevert (2026-02-19 07:30:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/178757525
where the comment is: "🔄 Revert of unintended geometry change"
Norbert Dichter (2026-02-19 13:18:34+00:00): Hello, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. Thank you for your contribution. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. Or just hit the Q-key.
Also please keep in mind: many buildings are very close but do not actually touch each other, try to map them close to each other without letting them connect or share nodes with each other, roads, or residential area outlines. In the iD web editor, holding down the "alt" key will keep nodes from "snapping" to each other and accidentally connecting.  Thanks so much for your contribution, Norbert 'Nodi' Dichter, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178752328
pwbriggs (2026-02-19 05:13:55+00:00): Thanks! Building data is definitely sparse in this area, so thanks for helping out!
Sammyhawkrad (2026-02-19 07:50:48+00:00): Hello Aliu_Paul, don't add amenity=school to every building. There is one amenity=school polygon mapped for the entire school, and that should be enough.
You can, however, change building=yes to building=school to denote they are school buildings.
kimo (2026-03-03 00:34:06+00:00): It looks like this change has updated the map based on outdated aerial imagery, undoing recent changes from surveying.
EvanSiroky (2026-02-19 06:02:18+00:00): Source: https://data.sacog.org/datasets/SACOG::sacog-regional-centerline/about
Jarek 🚲 (2026-02-19 18:40:38+00:00): Hey Chris, just a heads up that setting access=no and bicycle=yes like you did on the Gordie Howe Bridge MUP (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1213883004) results in it being tagged as open to cyclists (because the more specific bicycle tag overrides the access=no tag).

In this case it's not a big problem because the access ways at the end of the bridge are still tagged bicycle=no so the bridge won't be used for routing currently, but something to keep in mind for the future!
HellMap (2026-02-19 11:08:10+00:00): Please note that crossings are almost never informal if they are a continuation of sidewalks, like in this location with lowered kerbs. In this case, these are just unmarked crossings.
baltimoore (2026-02-21 09:23:53+00:00): Thing is, one side of the road has the "official" marking of a sign and the zebra; the other is not really meant to be used as a crossing. If this does not actually count as an informal crossing, then I apologize; i simply picked the best option provided by StreetComplete
HellMap (2026-02-21 11:26:18+00:00): Hey, no worries. It's a little bit confusing, because there are so many types of crossings worldwide, but OSM also has to capture local variations in a standard way. There is some subjectiveness to this. The difference in this location is the intention of the crossing. Generally in cities, if there are lowered kerbs and/or the crossing is a logical connection between the sidewalks, then from OSM perspective it is a crossing, specifically one that is unmarked - no signs or zebra. Think of it in terms of navigation - would someone walking along the sidewalk cross the road here normally? In contrast, an informal crossing is something where a crossing is not intended/planned/built/expected at all, but is still legal and people frequently use it.

There's a brief explanation at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:crossing%3Dinformal#Similar_tags
vasony-qa (2026-02-19 16:52:54+00:00): Szia!

Légy szíves használ a StreetComplete utcanév kiválasztó funkcióját, mert így folyamatosan elgépeled a neveket.

Köszi, Tamás
pitfire (2026-02-19 12:08:17+00:00): Hallo Netsrohtreyem,

jetzt hast Du in der Bahnhofstraße Trassenüberlappungen erzeugt, die zu Folgender Fehlermeldung führt: (Kreuzende Straßen). Bitte informiere Dich ausreichend über die Vorgehensweise bei so tiefgreifenden Änderungen. Ich werde jetzt erneut die Fehlereinträge korrigieren und bitte Dich, weitere Änderungen gründlich zu recherchieren.

MfG pitfire
literan (2026-03-01 10:22:44+00:00): wrong mapping. read this document please https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Highway_classification

rverting
Wildsharky (2026-05-20 05:47:26+00:00): Hi literan,
Thanks for your feedback and for sharing your local knowledge.
The link road classification was updated based on the OSM highway_link guidance:
Highway link - OpenStreetMap Wiki 
This approach is also consistent with the related highway classification guidance on the Russian OSM wiki:
RU:Highway classification - OpenStreetMap Wiki 
 If there is a specific local reason this classification should be different, please share the details and I’ll be happy to review it.
literan (2026-05-20 06:14:04+00:00): osm.wiki/RU:Highway_classification:

"highway=motorway_link - съезды на развязках дорог, на которых действуют те же правила движения, что и на highway=motorway."

На данных линках НЕ ДЕЙСТВУЮТ эти правила: https://yandex.ru/maps/-/CPsXiPku

Этот знак отменяет ограничения, принятые для автомагистралей
literan (2026-05-20 06:15:01+00:00): also https://yandex.ru/maps/-/CPsXmCOi
Wildsharky (2026-06-04 11:38:59+00:00): Hi literan, 
I understand your point. I will not revert similar situations in Russia and I’ll be aware of this local context.
NeisBot (2026-02-19 07:21:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13579781224 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Web design office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-02-27 17:33:01+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/178758436
derloris (2026-02-19 16:14:13+00:00): Danke für die Pipeline-Einträge. Das einzige: Soweit ich gelesen habe, ist es nicht Regenwasser, sondern Grundwasser. Falls es dazu ein anderes Tagging gibt, kannst du das wenn du magst bei Gelegenheit noch ändern. : ) LG
DerKaiserschmarren (2026-02-19 17:46:48+00:00): Derzeit gibt es keinen passenden ...water tag lt. Taginfo, also müssten wir wenn einen neuen erstellen.
derloris (2026-02-20 11:28:52+00:00): Ah ok, danke für die Info.
osmviborg (2026-02-19 07:52:13+00:00): Hvorfor?
ildis6 (2026-02-19 08:33:05+00:00): som du kan se i det linkede kort er der en vejlukning på denne strækning
osmviborg (2026-02-19 08:41:46+00:00): Skulle der ikke tilføjes en bussluse, 'motor_vehicle=no' giver ikke busadgang.
osmviborg (2026-02-19 08:49:10+00:00): Du kan bare tilføje 'bus=yes' til vejstykket.
ildis6 (2026-02-19 08:51:21+00:00): Det er ikke en bussluse, der er kun en bussluse hvor det direkte står skrevet sammen med vejlukningen, hvilket kun er på Nygårdsvej.
osmviborg (2026-02-19 08:53:43+00:00): 👍
FajrAl (2026-02-28 09:45:03+00:00): Halo, perubahan ini saya balikkan. Untuk pemula disarankan memetakan wilayah kecil dahulu.
Kees 59 (2026-03-31 10:46:16+00:00): At Hôtel Central (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4059877025) you have used the key communication:mobile_phone for a mobile telephone number That is no correct.

communication:mobile_phone (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:communication:mobile_phone) is to identify if or what type is used on antennas.

For mobile telephone numbers the key mobile (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:mobile) could be used.

P.S. The "tel:" in the value should not be there, only the number.
marc__marc (2026-02-20 17:23:27+00:00): Bonjour,
tu peux expliquer plus précisément ce qui te parait incorrect ? la modification précédente était bien documentée et sans information supplémentaire, le revert n'est pas compréhensible
Cordialement,
Marc
ajmat (2026-02-21 04:53:38+00:00): Hi marc__marc
Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you.
ajmat (2026-02-25 12:15:42+00:00): Hi marc__marc
Thank you for reaching out. I reverted the changeset because it was breaking existing road connectivity, which is visible on BD Ortho IGN imagery.
I see that there were further edits and corrections in the area. Please let me know if you have any suggestions or specific mapping insights regarding there. I will ensure to follow community best practices to keep OSM map data accurate and up-to-date.
marc__marc (2026-02-25 16:23:23+00:00): Hello,

I hope you have translated the comment of the reverted changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178713508 : he explicitly said that some connectivity doesn't exist anymore ("sente" mean path).
Of course those "destroyed" parts will still be visible on satellite imagery taken the previous year.
I invite you to find the incorrectly restored segment and mark it as was:highway=path with the comment changeset description=Pour préserver les milieux naturels, les débuts de sente ont été effacés à la pioche et des graines ont été replantées en 2025.

Thanks,
Marc
ajmat (2026-02-27 12:46:49+00:00): Hi Marc__marc
Thank you for your feedback and sharing your knowledge. I am going to restore [https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1418834283]  and [https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1418834285] and tag them with (was:highway=path) and (description=Pour préserver les milieux naturels, les débuts de sente ont été effacés à la pioche et des graines ont été replantées en 2025) as per your suggestion.
Thank you for your time to help me better understand the situation.
mueschel (2026-02-28 11:03:18+00:00): Hi,
"horse:boarding" is a new tag. We do have https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Danimal_boarding
Could you check if this is applicable here?
sparnonien (2026-02-28 12:11:43+00:00): bonjour j'ai vu ce tag à plusieurs reprises et je l'ai déjà utilisé 
 Un lieu où l'on peut amener son animal pour qu'on en prenne soin durant un certain temps (exemple vacances)
Voir la documentation . 
Mais c'est bien un centre équestre sur place . belle journée à vous 

hello I have seen this tag several times and I have already used it A place where you can bring your pet to be taken care of for a certain period of time (e.g. holidays) See the documentation. But it is indeed an equestrian center on site. nice day to you
sparnonien (2026-02-28 12:23:57+00:00): pour information voici une utilisation à Gas 

addr:country=FR
addr:housenumber=28
addr:street=Rue Jean Moulin
amenity=animal_boarding
animal_boarding=dog;cat
contact:facebook=https://www.facebook.com/people/La-maison-de-L%C3%A9on/100068510791457/
description="Pension féline, éducation canine, promenades, lavage chiens et chats, boutique \nJ'ai racheté ce corps de ferme à Gas, où, après quelques travaux, je pourrais accueillir vos compagnons à la campagne et toujours en pension familiale."
name=La maison de Léon
phone=+33 6 33 77 88 77
ref:FR:SIRET=90084195800029
hsc666 (2026-02-19 18:31:23+00:00): CS reverted wg. Beschädigungen
dknelson9876 (2026-02-21 02:09:24+00:00): Thank you for your contributions to the map! Unfortunately, I’m not sure they belong. OSM is intended to be a map as things are on the ground, and that means an office mapped on a house stood out to me. I checked out your website and couldn’t find any addresses for (potential) customers to visit, which is a pretty good sign that this ‘shop’ is not intended to be public and therefore doesn’t belong on the map.

I’d appreciate if you can demonstrate otherwise, such as with an image of signage posted outside. If not, I intend to revert your changes after one week.
HantDX (2026-02-19 08:54:19+00:00): Тэг website используется только для официальных сайтов, связанных с объектом. Сайт пошык.инфо таковым не является. Тут уместнее использовать более общий тэг url или реже - тэг source_ref, если данные из ссылки использовались для тэгирования объекта.
ntzm (2026-03-03 18:17:38+00:00): Hey, Bagels Inc is already mapped here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13495636527

Since you are on Organic Maps, this might be because your data was not up to date with this change yet.

I have deleted the one you have added now.

Thanks for contributing to OSM!
Supaplex (2026-07-15 02:03:04+00:00): Duplicated, already exist
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/198137945
softcake (2026-07-07 08:26:56+00:00): Hallo,
da scheint wohl was schief gelaufen zu sein. Der Abschnitt ist sicher kein Pfad, sondern eine schmale Straße. 
Auch der Weg hoch von der Hölzlmühle ist ein Track und kein Pfad.
War sicher ein Versehen. Ich hab das mal korrigiert.
Gruß, Thomas
MaciekMma (2026-02-19 11:56:16+00:00): Hej, te szlaki sa gdzies w ogole dostpene online, czy dopiero Twoja inicyjatywa ozywi je w internecie? Niby taki duzy projekt a poza oznakowaniem w terenie (chyba ze myle projekty) i papierowymi broszurkami nigdzie nigdy nie bylo o tym slychac.
Arno Schotmans (2026-02-19 12:23:53+00:00): Cześć,
Te szlaki nie istnieją online - i właśnie o to chodzi, żeby istniały. Sieć powstała 14 lat temu. „Digitalizuję” ją na podstawie ich (czyli Bialskopodlaskiej Lokalnej Grupy Działania, blgd.eu) własnej mapy - za ich zgodą. Jeszcze w tym roku będziemy wspólnie pracować nad odnowieniem i rozbudową sieci.
MaciekMma (2026-02-19 14:49:01+00:00): Bardzo dobra robota, po prostu mnie dziwi, ze nikt z tej organizacji nigdy tego nie udostepnil online, w formie dostosowanej do wspolczesnych realiow (teraz robisz to Ty). To tak jakby tego nie bylo :)
HantDX (2026-02-19 09:06:32+00:00): "На жаль, знайсці хоць якія-небудзь сляды ці напамін аб тым што тут стаяў трох векавы храм ужо немагчыма." Если от объекта абсолютно ничего не сохранилось, то это не tourism=attraction, как по мне. Максимум можно отметить как historic=archaelogical-site и archaeological_site=church, если остатки фундаментов здания ещё сохранились где-то под землёй, но это точно не туристическая достопримечательность.
infeeeee (2026-02-19 09:33:57+00:00): Szia!

Budapest városrészeit tartalmazó rendeletben kötőjellel szerepel: 

Budapest Főváros Önkormányzata Közgyűlésének 94/2012. (XII. 27.) önkormányzati rendelete
a közterület- és városrésznevek megállapításáról, azok jelöléséről, valamint a házszám-megállapítás szabályairól

https://net.jogtar.hu/rendelet?council=fovaros&dbnum=104&docid=A1200094.FOV
qstep (2026-02-19 19:20:08+00:00): A rendeletben valóban kötőjellel van írva, de a wikipedia szerint ez csak 2012. december 12-től van így: https://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budapest_v%C3%A1rosr%C3%A9szeinek_list%C3%A1ja

Feltételezem ez előtt nem volt hivatalosan szabályozva a városrészek neve.

A 2012. január 1-i KSH még egybeírva említi: https://www.ksh.hu/apps/!cp.hnt2.telep?nn=13578

Tehát a wikipedia rossz, nem az OSM :)
infeeeee (2026-02-19 19:40:59+00:00): Visszaállítottam itt osm-en, wiki vitalapján megemlítettem ezt.
qstep (2026-02-19 20:02:45+00:00): Javítottam a wikidata és wikipedia bejegyzéseket. Wikipedia szócikk címét nem tudom, hogy kell átírni, ott még a régi szerepel valamiért. Gondolom mert ütközik a sziget szócikkével.
infeeeee (2026-02-19 20:06:11+00:00): Ilyeneknél a (városrész) utótagot szokták hozzáadni, pl: https://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Újpest_(városrész)
qstep (2026-02-19 20:15:46+00:00): Közben sikerült, van egy komplett "Átnevezés" űrlap. Most vadászom, hol van még a régi név használva.
Tacsipacsi (2026-02-28 15:09:57+00:00): Ezek szerint a tisztelt városatyák nem ismerik a helyesírást. ☹ Ettől még persze az OSM-nek azt kell követnie, ahogy ők leírták, köszönöm a korrekciót! (A Wikipédia-szócikkbe azért elhelyeztem egy jelzést, hogy ez nem így helyes, az OSM-en bőven elég az old_name.)

> Feltételezem ez előtt nem volt hivatalosan szabályozva a városrészek neve.

De volt, a régi rendelet (9/1989. (1990. I. 31.) Főv. Tan. rendelet, https://net.jogtar.hu/rendelet?docid=98900009.FOV&council=fovaros&timeshift=20121228) 16. § (3) bekezdése szerint a főjegyző tartotta nyilván ezeket a neveket. Viszont nem tudom, hogy hogyan lehet hozzájutni ahhoz a nyilvántartáshoz tizenhárom év távlatából.
Rainero (2026-03-14 22:46:11+00:00): Revert mit changeset/179878229
(unzulässige Quelle)
michalgwo (2026-03-06 20:52:55+00:00): Czy ten Zimowy wariant dojścia na Szpiglasową Przełęcz wg webinaru TPN Marcina Józefowicza jest jakoś oznaczony/widoczny w terenie?
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-03-21 18:12:34+00:00): wycofane w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180220248
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-03-21 18:13:54+00:00): 1) czy tam jest jakkolwiek ścieżka? pewnie nie i to co najwyżej jest highway=no

2) jaka licencja tego źródła danych jest

3) czy to jest konkretna trasa czy jakiś ogólny przybliżony korytarz ?