piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2024-07-30 09:36:46+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------

A: Inaccurate mapping.

D: Connecting Nodes to other features.
E: Buildings not squared.


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154131124
Jrachi (2024-10-26 08:40:32+00:00): Ciao.
Mi sembra che hai fatto un po di confusione sui tag.
Un percorso chiuso si indica con:
state=closed
Sicuramente non con
access=no da usare sulle way o punti di accesso
E sicuramente non si deve mettere su osmc:symbol, name e ref

Percorsi:
7766574
7766574
15000479
3180859
7766575

Ivo
StreetSurveyor (2024-07-20 05:06:19+00:00): Hi,
This was a bad edit. I have surveyed the road and it exists.
A_Prokopova_lyft (2024-07-22 12:13:14+00:00): Hi StreetSurveyor!
I’m Anastasia. I'm an OSM communications specialist on the OSM mapping team at Lyft. 
Thanks for bringing this to our attention. 
Based on our internal sources, the driver opted for an alternative route instead of the specified road. The latest satellite imagery did not clearly show the road, which led us to believe the map information was outdated, prompting us to remove it.
We appreciate your verification and correction of our error. 
Moving forward, we will exercise greater diligence in monitoring such changes.
Best regards!
literan (2024-07-22 18:07:01+00:00): корректный тег amenity=driver_training

поправлю
LockOnGuy (2024-07-19 08:30:48+00:00): Please stop this behavior, This is not a street name.       
And there is no sign with such name as "شارع النجارين"         
I already explained enough to you in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154096970      
I'm reverting this changeset.      
Regards.
ChehrehBargi (2024-07-19 08:45:50+00:00): If you read above, I have said that there is no sign here, but this place is known by this name. As I said in the previous registration, if the name is incomplete, correct it. Why are you deleting it all? It seems that you only delete my registration. Al-Brid Street(شارع البريد) is the same. Can you tell me why you don't touch it? And, of course, you should not delete a registration that is partially correct.
橘ヒカリ (2025-11-03 18:51:16+00:00): 您好，请勿更改命名，地铁线路统一为xx轨道交通/地铁/xx线路。已经在174162038中回退。
map per (2024-07-20 12:14:14+00:00): Wegen review_requested:
Die Änderung sieht gut aus, danke!
bxl-forever (2024-07-19 08:56:42+00:00): Hello,
Perhaps I am mistaken by I suspect this ATM is a replacement of the existing one, isn’t it?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4420865089
In that case, it would be better to re-use the existing node and change the tags instead of creating a new node.
What do you think?
Gheorges (2024-07-19 09:05:17+00:00): Yes indeed. I have pointed the atm when I was in the station but I have seen afterward the BNP ATM that for sure is not present anymore.
With the stairs all around it is not clear.
Let's say that indeed, it is the BNP that has changed by a Bancontact Cash ATM
https://atm.bancontact.cash/nl/bancontact-cash-elsene-nmbs-brussel-luxemburg-0013
bxl-forever (2024-07-19 15:56:58+00:00): OK, thanks, I’ll merge them.
ChehrehBargi (2024-07-19 09:50:34+00:00): foreign user! Your type of literature is disgusting. I am the editor who registered the name of a street according to field information and inquiries from the residents. Of course, there is no sign on this street that says its name. But in such cases we are allowed to use the name by which it is known. But you keep erasing it.
LockOnGuy (2024-07-19 09:56:56+00:00): Please use apropate language here in OSM when you talk to other fellow mappers. You are not Iraqi, which makes you a foreigner. If you don’t understand it’s meaning, or misunderstood it, please go read the definition and meaning of the word, or use a translation app.    
About the rest if what you said, please go read what I told you again in your changeset when you added it. Its the link in this changeset comment. Regards.
ChehrehBargi (2024-07-19 10:15:00+00:00): Does it matter where the editor is from? Can't someone from country X1 edit something in country X2? Certainly, any editor can fix the problem of visibility anywhere on the world map. Note that our problem now is that you have deleted the name I registered for the street. The name of Al-Najarin street was registered according to the inquiries from the local people and the attendance at the place. If it has a small number, you should add it instead of erasing it entirely.
ChehrehBargi (2024-07-19 10:15:11+00:00): Also, you didn't answer my question, why didn't you remove the name of Albrid Street, which is at the intersection with this street and the conditions are the same as this street, but you deleted my registration?
LockOnGuy (2024-07-19 10:26:57+00:00): Anyone can edit at any place of the map, but since you’re a foreigner, you don’t know our local laws or might even be confusing to you since the naming system we have is different from the one used in your country.      
If a road has no ‘name’ tag added in OSM that doesn’t justify adding whatever we want. And I already told you that residential streets do not have names in Iraq, only numbers. You added “carpenter market” as the name of the street, then add it again as “carpenter street” which is also wrong. You can add the market as a buildings, landuse, shop, etc. but not add it to the street like this way, which can also considered as advertising, even if the market is well known.    
About the other example you gave, I also explained it to you in your changeset but you keep ignoring. I told you, if you noticed any errors in the maps, you shall correct them, not copy them.      
If you need help with anything else, let me know.   
Regards.
ChehrehBargi (2024-07-19 10:35:11+00:00): I did not act according to my own taste but asked the local people. By the way, contrary to its name, there are mostly tool stores here and not carpenters' market. Tool shops are here. We have in the rules: if there is no official name for a street, the local name is better than leaving the name blank.
LockOnGuy (2024-07-19 10:42:31+00:00): There were carpenters located here and still some I guess, and they told you the descriptive name of the area which is the carpenter market, the name you firstly added, which is a descriptive name for a market that was located in this street. Not an actual name for the street.
ChehrehBargi (2024-07-19 12:16:45+00:00): I asked the shop on the same street for the name I added at the beginning.
I asked two people from the city of Karbala for the name that I added later.
Besides, most of the shops there are sales tools. You can go and see for yourself.
I have not added a descriptive name. "Al-Najarin Street" is exactly the name of this place, not a description of it.
LockOnGuy (2024-07-19 12:20:03+00:00): Exactly, the place, not the street name. Regards.
ChehrehBargi (2024-07-19 12:31:47+00:00): Regarding Shariah al-Brid, you still failed to answer. If that street is wrongly registered, why didn't you delete it? In the rules, we have: if a place is marked with a sign, we will register it, and if there is no sign, we can register the name that the local people use for that place, and this is exactly what I have done for Al-Najareen Street, but you keep removing it. do. You can read this document...
https://osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf
ChehrehBargi (2024-07-19 12:37:08+00:00): In response to this sentence: Exactly, the place, not the street name. Regards
You play with words. I have not put the name of the market on the street. People know the name of this street as Al-Najarin Street. If a sign is added in this street, the name on the sign will be transferred to the "name" tag, and Al-Najarin street will be added to the "loc_name" tag.
LockOnGuy (2024-07-19 12:46:13+00:00): Read my comment in the first discussion in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154096970 and the one here again.       
What you are adding is not a "local name" of a street, it's a descriptive name of the area. which shall not be added to the street. At first you added the name "Alnajaren market" as a name to the street, then you added "Alnajareen Street" which is also wrong because it's based on the market.    
Let me show you how it shall be done with an example, here is a street, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/83189259 , it's name 115-9 because it's Mahala 115 and Zuqaq 9, this street has a market called Sooq Hannon (Hanoon Market) https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12039975701  with tens of shops which is a 100 year old, the people call this area Sooq Hannon, but you see, we did not add the name of the Market to the street.       
Regards.
ChehrehBargi (2024-07-19 13:17:45+00:00): In response <<At first you added the name "Alnajaren market" as a name to the street, then you added "Alnajareen Street" which is also wrong because it's based on the market.>>
I already answered who I asked about this both times. The contents that you mentioned about the streets based on the number; Now we don't have the name on the sign for the street, so we can add the name that the local people use and don't leave the name tag blank. Considering that the local people also use the same name and considering
https://osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf
The registration of "Al-Najarin Street" is correct. I must emphasize that this is not a description of the market or the condition of this street, but the name of the street.
LockOnGuy (2024-07-19 13:26:37+00:00): No, its a description name of the area.     
Having a descriptive name of the area or the market in the street like سوق النجارين which translate to “Alnajaren Market” or شارع النجارين which translate to “Alnajaren’s street” is a seed for wrong mapping, and we shall not do that.     
Instead of that, why not asking for the actual correct name and add it?
ChehrehBargi (2024-07-19 13:47:19+00:00): On what basis do you say that it is a description? Have you just visited the translator site? This is not a market where people do carpentry. There are mostly tool shops here. (I have said this in the previous notes). It is not true that because you don't think the name of this street is XXX, it is the same in reality. Please go to this street and see closely. I have asked the residents and they told me the name "شارع النجارين", but you say without research that it is a description and the name of the market...
    شارع النجارين is the local name of this street. Why do you persist? If you know the name of a number correctly, add it. If you don't know, don't delete the local name.
LockOnGuy (2024-07-19 14:12:23+00:00): Now your story is getting inconsistent, above you stated,
  
>I asked the shop on the same street for the name I added at the beginning.   
   
And the name you added first was "سوق النجارين"     
   
>I asked two people from the city of Karbala for the name that I added later.   
  
And the name you added later was "شارع النجارين".

and now you state,   
   
>I have asked the residents and they told me the name "شارع النجارين".    
   
Please stop this. You are just being stubborn and repeating yourself over and over again.   

I will give you another example if you still do not understand why, even though I shouldn't by this point because it's really simple and it's basically common sense. If There is a house on a street, and that house has a resident by the name lets say David, should we name his street as "David's Home" or "David's Street" if there is no name on the street in OSM? absolutely not we shall not, instead we leave it empty until adding the right name to the way. Same goes for Markets. You dropped the word "Market" but kept the Market's name and added the word Street to it.    
   
If you want to map the market, the correct way to do it, just like the Market at the north end of this subject street, see: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/850615552    
  
Please stop repeating yourself and arguing like that, and I also recommend you edit in areas in your country instead that you might have local understanding in.        
     
Bye.
ChehrehBargi (2024-07-19 14:32:09+00:00): My words have not changed, the second and third cases you quote from me are the same. I say again; I asked two people from Karbala to give the first name to the shopkeepers and the second name because you made me suspicious. Do you insist on making me look like a liar? Go instead of these things and ask the people there as I did. You are trying to sideline the issue when it is very simple; It has an official name and a local name (not the market) that people know by that name. Currently, we do not have the official name and we have to use the local name. so easily And it's not that I put the prefix "سوق" instead of the "شارع" and put it in the tag, but I have inquired about it. Of course, in the place itself, not by using a computer.
empty_child (2024-07-19 14:41:24+00:00): Hello
Please, don't add this info in name tag, it's about ref (ref:en in this case). It would be great if you check the common practice and fix it
Frans S (2024-07-19 10:41:26+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

A remark.  Tracks are default unpaved. No need to add that tag.

Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154133043
catlover1995 (2024-07-19 08:59:09+00:00): Needs to be reverted
marczoutendijk (2024-07-25 07:38:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 154379652 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert version 3: vandalism on highways
Strubbl (2024-08-02 22:05:59+00:00): Hi moraic, 

vielen Dank für deinen Eintrag. Bitte den Straßennamen bei Einträgen in OSM immer ausschreiben, also zB. nicht Straße mit Str. abkürzen - vor allem weil Abkürzungen nicht immer eindeutig sein müssen.

Vielen Dank & Viele Grüße
martinst (2024-07-23 15:40:20+00:00): Die Beschilderung vor Ort erlaubt den Durchgang und verbietet nur die Durchfahrt. Zudem macht der neue erstellte Way 1302459484 parallel zum existierenden Weg keinen Sinn.
Revertiert in Changeset 1302459484.
Den Wortlaut der Beschilderung habe ich ergänzt: Node 1194362773.
ChNe (2024-07-23 16:27:20+00:00): Am Gartentor zu dem Anwesen befindet sich ein Schild: Privat - kein Durchgang
martinst (2024-07-23 18:56:39+00:00): Für welchen Weg(-abschnitt) gilt diese zweite Beschilderung? Zum Haus selbst ist in OSM kein Weg eingetragen.
Die access-Werte von Way 103436664 habe ich wie gesagt anhand der Beschilderung am westlichen Ende eingetragen.
Ist der Weg von Osten kommend genauso beschildert?
ChNe (2024-07-24 08:09:25+00:00): Der Weg endet in dem Anwesen, von Osten kommend gibt es keinen Weg - Die Karte ist unrichtig - siehe google maps - dort ist der Weg korrekt eingetragben.
martinst (2024-07-24 09:48:44+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis.
Ich habe die Wegverbindung in Changeset 154341249 gelöscht.
ChNe (2024-07-24 10:50:07+00:00): Dankeschön
aTarom (2024-07-31 13:37:13+00:00): Hola, una consulta, por qué se cambiaron las vías del tren en miniatura a montaña rusa?
se revierte esa parte en
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154649662
me dices, saludos
Architeutis (2024-08-01 13:22:14+00:00): Hola buenas tardes,
Error mio, cuando miré sus etiquetas solo vi ferrocarril, pero no la parte "en miniatura". 
Al no conocer dicha etiqueta pensé que teniendo en cuenta que el trenecito es una atracción que va sobre vias, la etiqueta montaña rusa era mas adequada. Pero ahora viendo la antigua version veo que fué un error de lectura por mi parte (y al mismo tiempo he descubierto la posibilidad de especificar hasta "ferrocarril en miniatura". 
Muchas gracias por la corrección y perdón por las molestias.
flohoff (2024-07-19 10:57:28+00:00): Moin,
ich habe die wege mal zu "Footways" gemacht - Das mit dem horse=no/bicycle=no braucht man dann nicht.

Simplifikation

So long

Flo
PavelChekov (2024-07-20 11:46:54+00:00): Haste recht, thx!
CapitaineMoustache (2024-07-25 18:07:51+00:00): Bonjour Ouba !

Je me permets de vous contacter au sujet de la création de cette relation dite "Voie verte de Charlieu Belmont".

Il ne s'agit pas d'un itinéraire cyclable au sens où il ne bénéficie d'aucun balisage particulier ni numérotation (hormis les panneaux C115 signalant les voies vertes).

Des portions de ces voies vertes font en revanche partie de La Véloire (V71, schéma national) et balisés comme tels (portion Charlieu-Pouilly).

Tout ça pour dire qu'il me semble que cette relation n'a pas lieu d'être, à mon humble avis.
Je précise que je m'appuie sur une connaissance directe du terrain puisque j'ai parcouru et cartographié ces nouvelles portions pour le compte de la ComCom qui les a mis en place, vous pouvez voir les photos Panoramax que j'ai téléversées ici : https://panoramax.openstreetmap.fr/#background=streets&focus=map&map=12.25/46.12417/4.14553&speed=250

Au plaisir de vous lire, :)

CapitaineMoustache
CapitaineMoustache (2024-07-28 19:56:19+00:00): Bonjour,

Je me suis permis de supprimer la relation en question et un petit morceau de voie verte qui traverse la Rue de la République à Pouilly-sous-Charlieu : en fait, à cet endroit, la traversée se fait par un passage piéton déjà cartographié (avec bicycle=yes pour signaler que les vélos peuvent y passer).

N'hésitez pas à réagir si vous avez des questions/remarques.

Bonne mapperie !
flohoff (2024-07-19 10:47:55+00:00): Moin Hajo, 
Gebäude nicht löschen. Der nächste trägt die wieder aus dem ALKIS oder Luftbild ein.

Es gibt extra die Lifecycle tags - Also wenn gebäude abgerissen wurden wird das von building=yes auf demolished:building=yes umgetagged. Damit wird es nicht mehr gerendert aber der umriss ist noch in der Datenbank. Damit ist allen anderen mappern klar das nicht neu einzutragen.

Fürs nächste mal.

Flo
Frans S (2024-07-19 10:38:41+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
A: Buildings not accurate mapped.
D: Connected nodes to a road.
E: buildings not squared.

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154134665
flohoff (2024-07-19 10:50:28+00:00): Moin,
ich vermute das war nur ein unfall das du hier das als multipolygon relation eingetragen hast.

Das hab ich mal vereinfacht. War ja unnötig.

Flo
PavelChekov (2024-07-20 11:46:41+00:00): Ja, das war Quatsch. Vielen Dank!
NorthCrab_upload (2024-07-19 09:50:24+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1302462933

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
mcliquid (2024-07-19 11:45:39+00:00): I have nothing against the edit per se, but may I question how useful it is to put a Google Maps link in OpenStreetMap as a website?
PattaFeuFeu (2024-07-19 12:14:26+00:00): I generally agree with that sentiment and would not have added Google Maps links to OSM myself, ever. But for this MapRoulette task, with the announced sunsetting of the goo.gl URL shortener, I felt it more adequate to, for now, only replace the URLs with their redirect targets. I did try to replace them with actual place websites or, at worst, Facebook, but in some cases couldn’t even find those for the places I didn’t do that with.
infeeeee (2024-07-19 17:48:12+00:00): Facebook links should go to contact:facebook not to the website tag
Tatti Barletta (2024-07-20 07:23:14+00:00): From the wiki: "The website=* tag is used to provide the full URL to the official website for the related feature". Anything on Google Maps is obviously not an official website, so it should be removed. Facebook links, as already mentioned, have their own tag and should be moved there.
Odra_99 (2024-07-27 06:25:12+00:00): Why do you create circular pedestrian path? It's wrong, I live in this quarter
Map47 (2024-07-27 14:16:41+00:00): Buon giorno.
Ho cercato di ovviare alle segnalazioni di OSMI riguardo ai dati da te inseriti.
Hai creato un multipoligono per delimitare la zona pedonale ma non la hai collegata alla rete viaria.
Hai inserito un percorso pedonale, anche in questo caso senza il collegamento alla rete viaria con conseguente segnalazione di problemi di routing,
Ho apportato le modifiche opportune per eliminare le segnalazioni senza stravolgere i dati che ai inserito e che nessuno dubita non corrispondano alla realtà.
Cordialmente.
ivanbranco (2024-07-27 16:19:09+00:00): Hi Map47, thanks for your fixes, but I don't think the points Odra_99 raised are entirely wrong.

Here, the western half of the sidewalk you mapped has quite an offset; it goes over the parked cars. The situation is clearer in Esri Clarity, which I suggest you use for edits in Italy over Mapbox Satellite in most cases.

In the other changeset, Odra pointed out that there was no grass in reality. You replied about the multipolygon fix, but the grass addition wasn't needed to correct that problem.

@Odra, se possibile non cancellare edifici per poi ridisegnarli, questo fa perdere la storia dell'elemento: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history
Starei particolarmente attento poi a cancellare edifici importati dal comune di Palermo (source=Comune di Palermo) e col mapping dei multipoligoni (che é ciò che Map47 sta cercando di sistemare).
Map47 (2024-07-27 18:09:04+00:00): @ivanbranco,
La zona è stata disegnata da più mappatori usando foto satellitari differenti e non riposizionate.
Riposizionando le foto di MapBox rispetto alla via principale molti elementi risultano scostati dalla posizione reale.
In particolare la zona pedonale è posizionata malamente, mentre il percorso pedonale vicino ai cassonetti di riciclo risulta OK (Immagini Mapillary)
Visto che la mappa è solo una rappresentazione della realtà ma non corrisponderà mai alla realtà l'importante è che la rappresentazione logica sia rispettata e in questo caso direi che lo è.