piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2025-09-22 14:26:52+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback   access=no is bijna altijd verkeerd om te taggen icm met andere accesstags.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
rempshaener (2025-09-22 17:45:57+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.

Ich habe eine Anmerkung zu deinen Ergänzungen, hier www.openstreetmap.org/node/13162287623. Einen Wert wie „other“ gibt es bei „water_source“ eigentlich nicht. Was ist denn die Wasserquelle? Dann schaue ich mal, was passt.

Vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag und weiterhin viel Spaß beim Mappen.
Viele Grüße
WF Bayernoil (2025-09-23 10:43:31+00:00): Hallo, der Hydrant hängt auf einem betriebseigenen Wassernetz, das mit Brunnenwasser / Betriebswasser (also kein Trinkwasser) gespeißt wird, welche Wasserquelle wäre hier zu wählen?
rempshaener (2025-09-23 15:45:45+00:00): Hallo,

meine Empfehlung wäre, das mit water_source=groundwater anzugeben.
Damit ist klar, dass es nicht das Trinkwassernetz des öffentlichen Wasserversorgers ist.
Um klarzustellen, dass die Wasserentnahme nicht im Saugbetrieb erfolgt, sollte dann noch fire_hydrant:pressure=yes (oder der tatsächliche Druck) ergänzt werden.
Bei weiteren Fragen gerne melden.

Viele Grüße
joshnolan (2025-09-27 20:55:10+00:00): אהלן צור, אני רואה שאתה פעיל מאוד פה. תודה ששמת לב לכרמיאל :)
לפי ההגדרה של OSM - זה מתאים למקום שבין village לבין city, וזו לדעתי הגדרה מתאימה יותר לכרמיאל. בתרגום לעברית, אגב, זה גם כן עיר.
המקומות *היחידים* שמוגדרים נכונה כ-city בישראל הם ת"א, י-ם, ב"ש וחיפה, כאשר כל השאר (כמו נהריה, עכו, זכרון...) מתוייגות כ-town.
עם כל האהבה והכבוד לעיר, אני חושב שיש לה עוד זמן עד שתגיע לסטטוס של 4 המטרופולינים :)
joshnolan (2025-09-27 20:55:39+00:00): אהלן צור, אני רואה שאתה פעיל מאוד פה. תודה ששמת לב לכרמיאל :)
לפי ההגדרה של OSM - זה מתאים למקום שבין village לבין city, וזו לדעתי הגדרה מתאימה יותר לכרמיאל. בתרגום לעברית, אגב, זה גם כן עיר.
המקומות *היחידים* שמוגדרים נכונה כ-city בישראל הם ת"א, י-ם, ב"ש וחיפה, כאשר כל השאר (כמו נהריה, עכו, זכרון...) מתוייגות כ-town.
עם כל האהבה והכבוד לעיר, אני חושב שיש לה עוד זמן עד שתגיע לסטטוס של 4 המטרופולינים :)
Tsur Halamish (2025-09-28 05:32:30+00:00): היי והנקודה ברורה. 
שאלה: האם היה על זה דיון בטלגרם של 
OSM Israel
?
השיקול שלי היה ללכת לפי משרד הפנים אבל אשמח לשמוע עוד דעות
joshnolan (2025-09-28 06:30:36+00:00): חחחח ההודעה הכפולה בטעות. את האמת שזו שאלה טובה - אין לי טלגרם...
כן ראיתי הצעה של הטאג metropolis, אבל היא ננטשה. לכן לדעתי הנוכחית היא הדרך הטובה ביותר להבדיל בין הערים הרגילות בארץ לבין 4 המטרופולינים. וגם אם כבר יש קונבנציית תיוג ארצית, אני חושב שכדאי להיצמד אליה עד שיעבור דיון.
joshnolan (2025-09-28 06:31:21+00:00): בכל פנים, אפשר מבחינתך להחזיר כרגע לתיוג הקונבנציונלי?
Tsur Halamish (2025-09-28 07:45:12+00:00): תחזיר חופשי. אני גם לא יודע אם הקונבנציה בישראל היא לפי משרד הפנים או לא. אולי אשאל שם ונראה מה יגידו. 
לשיקולך אולי 
להתקין טלגרם ומדי פעם להציץ בקבוצה. זה ממש בקטנה. היא כאן: 
https://t.me/OSM_Israel
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-24 17:04:41+00:00): reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410  and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969  remain not answered

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173727796
arte2002 (2025-09-22 22:08:58+00:00): Hola Pablo, gracias por mejorar los datos

Pero los nombres deben ir sin abreviaturas, en este caso sería
Calle Doctor Mas Magro
Nighter3487 (2026-01-09 18:00:44+00:00): Дядя, язык в Украине - Украинский, зачем тэг name вандалить?
SpinOff (2025-09-23 20:50:51+00:00): Hej. Punkt z krzyżem dodajemy w miejscu jego lokalizacji, nie łącząc go z drogami. Odkleiłem go od drogi i przesunąłem obok. Możesz zweryfikować lokalizację, bo nie jestem pewien czy wybrałem dobre miejsce.
map0er (2025-09-23 20:55:39+00:00): Dziękuję za uwagę. Lokalizacja jest teraz poprawna
user_5359 (2025-09-23 10:45:38+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/916675263. What is the mean of the tag DH Borca = DH Tornantini?
karlacio (2025-09-23 11:30:35+00:00): Hi, a mistake! Fixed. Thanks.
Kees 59 (2026-04-26 13:43:21+00:00): Ways: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1432013229 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1432013230 did something went wrong with copying here?
davegis (2026-04-26 13:55:07+00:00): I updated the two. Thank you for finding these. Sincerely, David Anderson
Myazyk (2025-11-01 16:57:28+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174042598
Taya_S (2025-09-22 16:40:17+00:00): Reverted edits made by sockpuppet account DWG Ticket#2025091110000041

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172305149
brightj (2025-09-22 16:28:52+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/brightj/diary/407482
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172301378
kuhni74 (2025-09-23 11:31:13+00:00): Are you sure that the track https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/302687136 to Göriachalmen is really surface=asphalt? My impression was that this is only true in short stretches?
-=|MisterY|=- (2025-09-23 14:03:04+00:00): Ah, no, sorry. That stretch of road was too long and I did not realize. Going down the valley, there are three distinct surfaces - compacted, two asphalt lines for wheels, and full asphalt. Unfortunately, I no longer remember where exactly they start/end. I've now adjusted this and the downstream stretch. But it is not all unpaved, as was tagged before.
kuhni74 (2025-09-23 14:18:35+00:00): thanks!
t_ja (2025-09-30 19:46:48+00:00): Ahoj,
odporúčam prečítať si občas aj OSM Wiki, aby sa nestalo, že highway=footway bude mať aj abandoned:highway=footway a dokonca aj abandoned=yes, viď. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1432013555

A pritom v realite len burina trochu prerastá po okrajoch chodníka, ale stred zarastený nie je, takže tadiaľ chodí dosť ľudí na to, aby to bolo označené ako "abandoned". Navyše teraz cez zimu až do začiatku leta tej buriny ešte ubudne. 
Stav "abandoned" by som dal až vtedy, keď začnú rásť kríky v chodníku, ktoré už ani cez zimu neumožnia takýto chodník využívať chodcom...

T.
brightj (2025-09-22 16:28:45+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/brightj/diary/407482 This was a mistaken duplicate edit.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172301526
eggie (2025-09-22 16:22:52+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Voor fietsers zal het niet verder routeren, want het verdere verloop is een wandelpad.
Mag je hier wel fietsen?
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-09-22 18:25:01+00:00): De overbodige accesstags heb ik verwijderd. Die zijn default. Het lijkt me bedoeld voor voetgangers.

MVG
eggie
Langlaeufer (2025-09-22 20:02:18+00:00): Ist dieser Weg wirklich asphaltiert?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/5002914
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172301618
gfsbk (2025-09-23 06:03:59+00:00): zumindest die ersten par Meter die ich von unten einsehen konnte.
kuhni74 (2025-09-23 14:21:02+00:00): parking probably not for the public (and not designated?), see https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4673835
kuhni74 (2025-09-23 14:25:13+00:00): after all, the track that leads here (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100664618) is restricted for private traffic, I'd suggest "access=private" for both parking places? Otherwise somebody could think that if you are a customer of "Hansalhütte" (e.g. drinking 2 beers), you are permitted to drive and park here, which is not true, as far as I know.
-=|MisterY|=- (2025-09-23 15:22:06+00:00): Right. It's for the tourists staying at the bungalows, which all seem to be available for rent.
kuhni74 (2025-09-23 15:43:18+00:00): Yes, but that's in fact like "private" - you have to book it in advance, probably, not like driving somewhere and saying: "I'd like to be your customer now", which is what I'd understand as "access=customers".
grzegorz75jan (2025-09-22 21:49:49+00:00):  "poprawa obrysu zabudowań" 
Tak lekką ręką 14 przecięć obszaru residentaial z budynkami.
Ogólnie obrys residential jest znakomicie skopany. Obszar wokół dowolnego budynku przecież jest od baby Jagi. Czysta abstrakcja.

W bonusie dodam, że leżą tam jak byk obrysy budynków których już nie ma.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/738668376
Znaczna część obrysów kompletnie nie pokrywa się nawet z obrysem dachu.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/738668379

Bonusy
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/738664282
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1097013140
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/738668383#map=19/49.950269/20.761172&layers=N


Od dłuższego czasu dodajesz do opisów zmian opis
"+ poprawa błędów"

Niestety żadnej sensownej poprawy nie w nich nie widać.
Pawelski44 (2025-09-23 15:23:51+00:00): Wiem okropnie to wygląda. Będę to poprawiał w wolnym czasie
BardafFr (2025-11-12 08:21:48+00:00): Hello, je vois que tu as remis les chemin de la résidence en access yes pour les bicycle. Je ne pense pas que ce soit bon, je t'explique mon point de vue.
L'accès est restreint par un portail, donc seul ceux qui on la possibilité d'ouvrir le portail peuvent y accéder, du coup c'est un accès privé, du coup moi je le mettrais en access private
Sébastien Pi (2025-11-12 11:27:03+00:00): Salut,

Ah ! je vois que nous nous bagarrons un peu ici^^ !

Oui, tu as raison pour le private. Je n’aurais pas dû mettre un yes.
D’ailleurs, je passerai bien ces footway en path. On est plus sur https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bicycle#Voie_pi%C3%A9tonne_partag%C3%A9e qu’un trottoir.
Il y a des trottoirs le long des voies de service, mais non cartographiés ici.
Donc ça donnerait des path/access=private (et pas de bicyle qui est implicite).

Ça te va ?
BardafFr (2025-11-12 11:29:09+00:00): Ça me vas très bien ;)
StC (2025-09-23 13:03:11+00:00): Hi,

this changeset has created a discontinuity in a hiking route that passes there, by creating two superposed ways belonging to the same relation. Someone needs to revert. You? me?
Lisapple (2025-09-26 15:30:11+00:00): Merci StC pour cette correction.
Je n'ai pas été assez rapide pour la faire moi-même ;)
StC (2025-09-26 19:30:32+00:00): En fait j'en ai fait un exercice d'analyse de discontinuité sur le canal Telegram OSM Plein Air. Et quand la solution a été trouvée je trouvais que c'était le bon moment pour clore le dossier :-)
user_5359 (2025-09-23 11:14:13+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/177421292. What is the mean of the tag hitr = reservoir? Please have also a look on https://www.osm.org/way=1432061619. What is the mean of the tag hitr = tr?
YomanNH (2025-10-22 20:12:25+00:00): Cześć,
po co po raz drugi dodałeś te same obiekty, które półtorej godziny wcześniej dodałeś w tym zestawie zmian: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172300367 ?
Taya_S (2025-09-23 12:50:23+00:00): Reverted edits made by sockpuppet account DWG Ticket#2025091110000041

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172342978
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-09-23 12:35:01+00:00): HI! Please do not change number of lanes with placement=transition. There is the tag width:lanes:start to show that the fourth lane has 0 width at the beginning and full width at the end. Thanks!
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-09-23 12:35:50+00:00): Sorry! You fixed it, forget my previous message, I was looking at a previous changeset!
TrickyFoxy (2025-11-18 13:18:46+00:00): Не удаляйте всё подряд. Вы поудалили границы города и района
Tommybara (2025-09-22 22:03:36+00:00): Hi! Could you explain the reason for applying the tag “place=city” to the wards. Since it’s pretty obvious that they are NOT cities.
Kiharu1410 (2025-09-23 03:41:58+00:00): Since OSM does not support tags like place=ward or place=commune, the most reasonable way to standardize this data for Vietnam is to tag wards as place=city and communes as place=town. This approach is consistent with OSM's documentation. As we have agreed on using admin_level=6 for the second-level administrative divisions of Vietnam, the OSM Wiki, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:place, indicates that place=city is a suitable tag for this level. Although place=subdistrict and place=municipality are also appropriate for admin_level=6, place=city is a more logical fit for wards. A ward cannot be tagged as place=suburb, which means "the edge of a large town or city" and translates to "Ngoại ô" in Vietnamese. For instance, a central area like a ward in Saigon is clearly NOT a "suburb." Similarly, communes cannot be tagged as place=village because many communes have large populations. Given that a commune is the same administrative level but below a ward, place=town is the next logical tag to use. To sum it up, this method provides the best way to standardize how all wards and communes are represented across Vietnam.
Tommybara (2025-09-23 04:55:34+00:00): I think you should read the description of place=suburb tag here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place=suburb?uselang=en
Tommybara (2025-09-23 05:07:25+00:00): Even boroughs of NYC use this tag, so clearly it is not the regular meaning of "suburb" as in the dictionary. I'm also not very convinced by your argument that "communes cannot be tagged as place=village because many communes have large populations". https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dvillage does not indicate anything regarding population. Many communes are mountainous areas, and clearly applying place=town for those doesn't make any sense.
Kiharu1410 (2025-09-23 06:35:20+00:00): Thanks for the reply. If place=suburb doesn't have to mean "suburb" in the dictionary sense, then city and town don't have to either. If we tag wards as suburbs, it can really screw up how address lookups work in systems like Nominatim (for example, in Saigon ward, now contains Thu Duc city node for every address) unless we removed the previous second-level divisions. Plus, it frees up the place=village tag for the actual villages (thôn and ấp) that sit under the communes, which just feels right. As I said, it was just to standardize the wards and communes, it's up to you if you want to fix the address. Regards.
Tommybara (2025-09-23 17:34:59+00:00): If we are to standardize everything across Vietnam, the most appropriate tag would be place=district for both wards and communes.
Kiharu1410 (2025-09-23 18:08:05+00:00): Using place=district works as a quick fix for the address issue, since it's more or less at the same admin level (admin_level=6) as the old divisions. The problem is, that tag is normally for places without clear-defined borders, and it won't make a label show up on the map. On top of that, if we use the same tag for both wards and communes, there's no way to tell them apart without reading the name. Honestly, it would be way more helpful to use different tags. That would make it much easier for people using the Overpass API to pull data for just wards or just communes.
Tommybara (2025-09-23 18:41:46+00:00): Then why do we need a label to show up on a map? Provinces don't have label nodes for them. In my opinion, place=city and place=town should only be reserved for real, and well-known urban areas, not a tag that is used all over the places.

Don't you see how ridiculous the map renders with giant place=city nodes near each other?
Kiharu1410 (2025-09-23 19:23:45+00:00): That sounds valid. But by that same reasoning, shouldn't a well-known ward in Saigon also be tagged as place=city? If we do that, you'll have a big text label for the ward right next to the main 'Ho Chi Minh City' label, which doesn't look good. If we tag it as place=district, the label disappears entirely. And if we stick with place=suburb for now, the address lookup issue remains. So, if we're going to keep using place=suburb, we'd have to remove the old city nodes to fix the address problem, but this seems undoable since we keep these for navigation. That's what I think, at least, if we find another way to fix the address lookup issue, that would be great. After all, the main purpose of this changeset is to correct only the address, and not for aesthetic reasons. I'll leave this changeset for now.
Tommybara (2025-09-23 21:14:55+00:00): I think the reason why Thủ Đức was appended to Saigon ward's address is because it was added as the 'label' role for the historic Thủ Đức city relation. I just removed it from the relation, and we will see if the issue persists.
Tewuzij (2025-10-14 10:02:00+00:00): May whoever orchestrated this administrative coup rot in hell! (In the gov, of course)
Kiharu1410 (2025-10-14 10:38:32+00:00): Can't blame them though, they're probably just trying to free up money for things like education, roads, and all that.
klik (2025-10-08 08:44:40+00:00): Hallo NxPFoto,
Respekt für Deine detaillierte Arbeit an dem Mehrgenerationenspielplatz Haldorf. 
Ich habe aber Zweifel, dass das landuse=meadow hier noch korrekt ist ;) Bestimmt hast Du das nur vergessen zu entfernen.

Gruß
klik
NxPFoto (2025-10-15 15:51:03+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis! :)
eggie (2025-09-22 19:04:22+00:00): Dag sorcerer34

Waarom zouden die adressen niet bestaan.
Adressen die op een T eindigen zijn meestal een afgesloten ruimte voor de elektriciteit. 
Kennelijk zit dat hier ergens als onderdeel van het gebouw. 
Heb je het opgezocht in het Kadaster? 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-09-22 19:07:25+00:00): Adressen hersteld
_klaas_ (2025-12-15 12:08:27+00:00): Hallo Lived428, du hast die Hochspannungsleitung in Richtung Frankreich mit 110000 V getagged. Wird diese Leitung mittlerweile wieder benutzt? Die Straßenfotos zeigen, dass diese Leitung beim Umspannwerk an der Daimlerstraße geerdet sind (0V), aber die Straßenfotos sind auch schon einige Jahre alt. Allerdings ist am westlichen Ende in Frankreich in Umspannwerk auf der 63000 V Ebene. Eine Anbindung der von Deutschland kommenden Leitung ist nicht erkennbar. Viele Grüße
_klaas_
eggie (2025-09-22 19:05:28+00:00): Hoi Dat zou kunnen, maar als iets gesloten is blijft het adres toch wel bestaan. Dat heb je nu ook verwijderd.
MVG
eggie
sorcerer34 (2025-09-22 19:29:04+00:00): Oops excusses. Ik ben nog nieuw hier, en was mij er niet van bewust dat deze twee gelinked zijn.
eggie (2025-09-22 20:04:59+00:00): Hoi.. no problem. Ik heb het dacht ik hersteld.

Mvg..
eggie
Vincentdesgms (2025-10-02 15:50:40+00:00): Bonjour, je viens de voir que vous avez ajouté l'attribut cycle_network=FR. Quelle est la signification de cet attribut ? La description du wiki n'est pas vraiment claire pour moi. 
Le réseau "Velo visavis " est un réseau international. Je m'applique à le garder à jour pour la partie sur le territoire français.
Cordialement,
Vincent
Taya_S (2025-09-23 12:50:24+00:00): Reverted edits made by sockpuppet account DWG Ticket#2025091110000041

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172342978
ljc_jlyb (2025-10-05 14:36:14+00:00): You don't have to invent names for things (and it's "갈"마, not "칼"마)
BigKev97 (2025-12-06 13:04:42+00:00): Translation is very tricky.
eggie (2025-09-22 18:20:50+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-09-22 18:57:01+00:00): Hoi De Wielstraat heeft een eigenschap van een knooppunt gekregen.
expected_rwn_route_relations=3

Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=172307370
Hoort dat daar wel? 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-09-22 20:37:48+00:00): expected_rwn_route_relations=3 verwijderd van wegdeel.
Groet..
eggie
ivanbranco (2025-09-22 18:05:57+00:00): Ciao Luigi,

hai cancellato i tag wikidata/wikipedia. Presumo perchè iD non ti faceva modificare il nome altrimenti, così facendo hai però cancellato informazioni utili.

Inoltre dovremmo mappare il nome in uso del luogo. Dal tuo commento sembra che il nome sia stato modificato solo per compiacere il geocoder, e non si mappa per il geocoder: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
Luigi Biagioni (2025-09-23 06:10:51+00:00): Non sapevo che la "Chiesa di San Rocco" non fosse più in uso e quando l'ho cercata non l'ho trovata perché preceduta da "ex" che non fa parte del nome e quindi mi è sembrato giusto toglierlo. Per il tag Wikipedia è stato un errore mio non ripristinarlo causato dal fatto che ne avevo perso i dati. Comunque l'ho cercata su Wikipedia e l'ho trovata con il nome senza "ex".
eggie (2025-09-22 18:54:24+00:00): Dit kan wel, want duidelijk een pad en bedoeld voor voetgangers.
Peetjedigitaal (2025-09-23 19:54:31+00:00): Dank, dan ga ik er nu vanuit dat deze, en die links er naast, goed is.
eggie (2025-09-22 18:53:33+00:00): Nou...... 
Toch iets gecompliceerder.
Iets is pas een footway als er een G7 bord staat. Hier dus beter path met de informaltagging. 
Als je denkt dat het niet de bedoeling is dat hier gefietst mag worden dan bicycle=no
 Anders gaat het inderdaad routeren.
Het pad is eigenlijk vis nog boter en dus door gebruik ontstaan. 
Maar up to you. Jij bent de lokale mapper. 
Gr eggie
rab (2025-09-22 19:54:46+00:00): Service road to the filling station is correct. But it is not a through way to Makhado. 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172313200
BenueRiver (2025-09-24 14:51:53+00:00): Hi rab,

Thank you for reaching out, I connected the service way west to Makhado because it appears drivable in Esri World Imagery. There are a few vehicles on the west side of the gas station and an opening is visible which vehicles can pass through. However, if this connection is unofficial and vehicles are discouraged from using this road, I’m happy to defer to your knowledge.

Thanks!
rab (2025-09-25 19:06:21+00:00): I don't have local knowledge either. But I would only consider it official if it were paved like the eastern part.
ZekOwney (2025-09-24 08:01:09+00:00): Salut Karr4s.

Il y avait une erreur de tag 'takeway' au lieu de 'takeaway'.

Erreur de saisie manuelle ou via une appli ?

Juste pour faire remonter au besoin.
karr4s (2025-09-24 08:25:33+00:00): Oups... Erreur de saisie manuelle. Navré et merci du signalement. ;)
Baloo Uriza (2025-09-23 14:45:51+00:00): Be sure to update or remove source:maxspeed=* when changing maxspeed=*
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172308254
maraf24 (2025-10-05 20:04:35+00:00): Pytanko: gdzie ten Copernicus? Zaznaczone tereny są tylko wg działek, nawet tam, gdzie na zdjęciach nie ma żadnej budowy.
eggie (2025-09-22 18:44:45+00:00): Ik heb het aangepast... motorvoertuigen routeren per default  niet over een fietspad..
behalve moped en mofa indien toegestaan. Hier niet.
eggie (2025-09-22 18:42:32+00:00): Logisch ... Zo begon ik ook in het begin. Kopiëren van een ander, maar dan is het resultaat niet altijd correct.
Ik heb het aangepast naar een G13 fietspad. 
Dus moped=no, mofa=no, traffic_sign=NL:G13
De rest is default. (ingebakken)

Mapse,
eggie
Taya_S (2025-09-23 12:50:25+00:00): Reverted edits made by sockpuppet account DWG Ticket#2025091110000041

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172342978
eggie (2025-09-22 18:29:36+00:00): Hoi Je vraagt feedback.. ,, access=yes hoort niet op reguliere wegen.
Dus die regel kan weg. 
Je hebt er een fietspad van gemaakt, maar dan hoef je niet al die accesstags toe te voegen.. alleen de uitzonderingen. Wat is dit voor een fietspad en voor wie is het bedoeld?

Tagging van fietspaden..
G11: mofa=yes, moped=no, traffic_sign=NL:G11
G12a: moped=designated, mofa=designated, traffic_sign=NL:G12a
G13: moped=no, mofa=no, traffic_sign=NL:G13

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Cycleway

gr eggie
eggie (2025-09-22 18:36:09+00:00): Ik heb het aangepast naar twee G13 fietspaden. 
Dus met moped=no, mofa=no, traffic_sign=NL:G13

Je hoeft niet aan te geven dat je mag fietsen. Ook een ruiter mag niet op een fietspad komen. Dat is allemaal default.
Peetjedigitaal (2025-09-23 19:55:21+00:00): Oke duidelijk, dank!
Peetjedigitaal (2025-09-23 19:55:49+00:00): Oke duidelijk, dank!
rab (2025-09-22 19:34:06+00:00): Are you serious?

This connection to a roundabout is impossible.