piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
sostock (2024-07-30 18:19:14+00:00): Gibt es einen Grund dafür, dass `ref` hier von `B 10` (mit Leerzeichen) zu `B10` (ohne Leerzeichen) geändert wurde? Außerhalb dieses Abschnitts ist die Bundesstraße weiterhin mit `B 10` bezeichnet, wie auch sonst für Bundesstraßen üblich.
gsperb (2024-07-31 07:56:46+00:00): Jein. Es war die Änderung von "B 10; B 28" auf "B10" weil in DE eine Strasse nicht zwei Nummern haben kann. Die gelben Schilder verweisen nur auf Richtungen.
Jetzt ist es wieder "B 10"
silversurfer83 (2024-04-23 20:10:13+00:00): Gude :)

du hast darum gebeten, dass sich jemand diese Änderung ansieht.

Mach ich mal.

Café sieht gut aus, könnte noch Öffnungszeiten und Kontaktmöglichkeiten vertragen.

Die viewpoints kann man so machen. Gut, dass du die Beschreibung in description und nicht in name gepackt hast. Was hier definitv noch helfen würde, wäre die Richtung, in die es besonders schick ist. Siehe hier
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:tourism%3Dviewpoint

bei Fragen immer raus damit und weiter viel Spaß an der Karte

silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150407040
miluethi (2024-04-23 19:39:50+00:00): Hi Juan, please square buildings after drawing the shape by selecting the frame and pressing the "Q" key in the iD Editor.
Thank you!
Juan Bustamante (2024-04-23 22:56:44+00:00): ok sounds good. Thank you!!!
pitfire (2024-04-30 04:42:27+00:00): Hi grossc,
auf dem Teilstück (Weg: 122302997) gibt es keine Höhenbegrenzung! Erst unter dem Rathaus beginnen die 2 Meter.
Bitte beachte: maxheight=* soll eigentlich nur rechtlich geregelte, also legale/ausgeschilderte Höhenbeschränkungen angeben. Wenn eine Straße unter einer Brücke oder ein Tunnel keine Höhenbeschränkungs-Beschilderung besitzt, und du Infos über die physisch maximal mögliche Höhe ergänzen möchtest, dann wird, zumindest in Ergänzung zu maxheight=*, ein Verwenden von maxheight:physical=* empfohlen. In diesem Fall "maxheight=default"
kikihadwiyanti (2024-05-25 23:31:20+00:00): Thanks for your contribution,  Well done and keep up the mapping, cheers!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150407821
eggie (2024-04-23 20:18:21+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
gscholz (2024-04-24 07:32:27+00:00): Hi Grannymeg,
can you please participate in the communication regarding your changesets made for HOT project 12190, for example here:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149821549

Kind regards
Guido
silversurfer83 (2024-04-23 20:15:20+00:00): Und wieder ich :)

Parkplatz sieht ziemlich gut aus. Bei Ticketverkauf hätte ich vielleicht eher einen Punkt innerhalb des Gebäudes gesetzt und da https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dticket dran getaggt. Kannst du ja nochmal drüber nachdenken.

cheers
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150408777
Mb_651 (2024-04-24 12:38:06+00:00): Mir fiele da noch ein zu fragen, ob da zum Parkplatz noch ein "access=customers" gehört, falls der Parkplatz nur für Gäste der Attraktion ist? Falls der kostenlose Parklatz für alle ist passt das schon so.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150408777
Tommybara (2024-04-23 22:08:21+00:00): The Prenn Pass is no longer part of the National Route system, and thus cannot be classified as trunk road anymore. Please don’t make such changes again. Thanks!
Allison P (2024-04-24 15:55:20+00:00): addr:state=* takes the postal abbreviation of the state, not the full name.
silversurfer83 (2024-04-23 20:17:36+00:00): Gude :)

der südliche Abschnitt ist laut tag mit einem VZ240 beschildert. Wäre dann auch ein path.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dpath

cheers
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150409149
meg_map (2024-04-24 09:21:39+00:00): Hi,
das Schild existiert dort nicht.
Habe den tag entfernt.
tekim (2024-04-24 00:10:50+00:00): Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap!  Thanks for your edits to the map.  Unfortunately, when editing OpenStreetMap we are not allowed to use Google Maps due to Google's Terms of Service.
tekim (2024-04-24 00:11:15+00:00): Reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150419116
tekim (2024-04-24 00:30:21+00:00): Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap!  It is great to have you as part of our community of map aficionados.  Thanks for your edit to the map.  You cited Google Earth as one of your sources, unfortunately, we are not allowed to use Google Earth when editing OpenStreetMap due to Google's Terms of Use.  To protect you, the OpenStreetMap project, and users of OpenStreetMap data, the edit will be reverted. You can redo the edit using only sources that are allowed.  One very good source for trails is the Strava Global Heatmap (requires an account, but the account is free).  You can also use Bing aerial imagery and Esri World Imagery.  You can also collect a GPS track using your phone or smartwatch.

Some minor additional things, the trail should be connected to the nearby road (presuming one can walk from the road to the trail).  This is helpful for routing.  The trail should *not* be connected to the powerline.  highway=path, rather than highway=footway, is probably more appropriate and matches the other trails in the area.
tekim (2024-04-24 00:31:23+00:00): Reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150419292
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-21 06:16:44+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11842081925/history has shop = storage that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
shop=storage ? Is it simply a shop=storage_rental? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=storage_rental Or is it selling boxes/packaging? Or for storing luggage?
HubMiner (2025-03-22 03:48:40+00:00): Hello, it is business that sells storage solutions specifically for garages, see their website.   shop=storage seems correct, shop=organization is another possiblity.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-28 11:11:05+00:00): Would you be fine with shop=storage_solutions_for_garages ? Avoids confusing with shop=storage_rental

Maybe office=company would be viable? It seems they are contracted to do jobs, rather than operating shop where one walks in and buys furniture
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-06-15 02:37:08+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5345413
MxxCon (2024-04-26 03:35:04+00:00): Hello.
When mapping crosswalks, if they are straight, please map them as straight ways. Not only would that make them more closely represent the real world features, but it also makes your mapping look less sloppy. JOSM has a shortcut key to straight a way. 👍
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150410987
VLD278 (2024-04-26 16:07:58+00:00): Hello. Thank you for reaching out. I wasn’t familiar with that hotkey but have now used it to correct the ways in this changeset. Thank you for the advice!
kingkingHK (2026-01-31 05:49:41+00:00): Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10213715620 really just connected to a footway like that? Also, are https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1116751169 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1122598161 supposed to connect?
vectorial8192 (2026-02-01 10:29:31+00:00): Re https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10213715620 , I see no other alternatives. If we make that a free node then it's ambiguous whether it is accessible via https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1116751169 or https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1122598161 .

This very nicely leads to the second part of the question. Actually, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1122598161 is slightly vertically sloped, so below the footpath is the government office https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10213715620 , and the entire bus terminus walkway.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-04-23 19:10:28+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1275376995

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Lafwairtay14 (2024-04-24 06:47:06+00:00): Everything is correct
Mb_651 (2024-04-24 12:33:03+00:00): Sieht prinzipiell okay aus. Warum aber sind da noch Abschnitte die "Bonner Straße" heißen? Siehe:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/168213285
Soll das so? Wenn nicht, schau dass du alles erwischt
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150411518
MorahT (2024-04-24 11:16:48+00:00): Why are you removing the "foot=designated" tags from designated public footpaths?

Removing these tags means the PRoW will now show as incomplete in https://osm.mathmos.net/prow/ and someone will have to go back in and retag them again.

See the below links:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Access_provisions_in_the_United_Kingdom

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Further_guidance_on_tagging_Public_Rights_of_Way_in_the_United_Kingdom
MorahT (2024-04-24 11:17:25+00:00): Also why was the dirt footpath along the south and west side on Neigh Bridge deleted?  This needs to be reverted back.
swinetown (2024-04-25 11:08:22+00:00): Hi there. 

The Neigh Bridge footpath removal was an error as I was rejigging a lot of path geometry around the park. I've re-added it.

I'm aware of the access provisions wiki page but I've always followed the advice that excess tags already implied by default shouldn't be added additionally; eg foot=designated is implied on highway=footpath so I've never bothered adding extra tags and usually instinctively remove them whenever I come across them.

I'm assuming you're saying the reverse is the case; I wasn't aware of this so I apologies for any issues this caused.

Rob's OSM Stuff is technically third-party though; is there anything on the wiki that clearly says already-implied tags should be added to PRoWs?
MorahT (2024-04-25 12:20:03+00:00): While Rob's OSM Stuff is technically third-party, it's the best tool we have to try to get the UK Public Rights of Way mapped and correctly tagged, and to find missing ones.  If tags are removed, we will be going backwards.

The wiki demonstrates adding "foot=designated" to all PRoWs: public footpaths, public bridleways, byways and restricted byways.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Access_provisions_in_the_United_Kingdom#Public_footpaths

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Access_provisions_in_the_United_Kingdom#Public_bridleways

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Access_provisions_in_the_United_Kingdom#Byways

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Access_provisions_in_the_United_Kingdom#Restricted_byways

Therefore, ideally they will contain the below tags.

Public footpaths:
designation=public_footpath
foot=designated
highway=*
prow_ref=*
surface=*

Public bridleways:
bicycle=designated
designation=public_bridleway
foot=designated
highway=*
horse=designated
prow_ref=*
surface=*

Byways:
bicycle=designated
designation=byway_open_to_all_traffic
foot=designated
highway=*
horse=designated
prow_ref=*
surface=*
vehicle=yes

Restricted byways:
bicycle=designated
designation=restricted_byway
foot=designated
highway=*
horse=designated
motor_vehicle=no
prow_ref=*
surface=*
vehicle=yes
swinetown (2024-04-25 17:50:50+00:00): Alright, looks like that was my bad then, that does explain why some of the PRoWs I was mapping weren't showing up on Rob's OSM Stuff. I agree it's probably the best PRoW tracking tool around at the moment.

I'll try and do a mass-edit at some point soon to add the missing tags to any PRoWs in the area which need them.
btwhite92 (2024-04-24 17:50:14+00:00): Hello,
This changeset bumped the expressway section of CA 120/108 up to 'motorway', which is incorrect. 'Motorway' is only used for freeways - divided highways with fully access control and grade separation, which standard this section does not meet. As such, I will be reverting this back to 'primary'.
Tim Niblett (2024-04-24 23:24:46+00:00): Ummm, this section does meet this criteria... I live here and this section is definitely separated.
btwhite92 (2024-04-25 00:26:50+00:00): It is divided, but it is not grade separated - i.e., intersections with other roads are at the same grade as the main highway. Likewise, there is little to no access control - the road provides direct access to abutting properties (driveways to private residences, farms, etc). These features are both prohibited in a freeway/'motorway' design.
Tim Niblett (2024-04-25 01:23:34+00:00): Ok, do you think that trunk would be a better fit then?
btwhite92 (2024-04-25 01:36:45+00:00): There has been a big push away from using 'trunk' based on the physical characteristic of the road, instead being used for "most important" routes - best interregional routes between large (city+ size) settlements. Primary is generally used for regionally important roads. Most of these major, interregional routes have been agreed upon for this state (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/California/2022_Highway_Classification_Guidelines) - though this list isn't set in stone, these state highways in the foothills are regionally important but don't serve any major interregional route (ie, say, Redding to Reno) so it would be a tough sell. But upgrading just this section because it is an expressway would be incorrect (see 'trunk' section of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States/2021_Highway_Classification_Guidance)

If you're concerned about expressway sections being visible, you might try the osm-americana style (https://zelonewolf.github.io/openstreetmap-americana/#map=10.06/37.8384/-120.606) which renders 'expressway=yes' sections with a double-casing as is more typical on US-style highway maps. I use this style to check that expressway tagging is correct at a glance.
silversurfer83 (2024-04-25 14:12:38+00:00): Moin Clemens,

hab diese Änderung mal im OSM D-A-CH Kanal auf telegram zur Diskussion gestellt und ein etwas erfahrenerer Kollege hat sich das angesehen. Scheint so zu passen und er hat auch direkt noch ein wenig weiter gemacht:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150495875
Clemens35041 (2024-04-25 14:37:18+00:00): Hallo silversurfer83, 
vielen Dank für das mit "draufschauen" auf meinem eingepflegten Wanderweg. 
Ich habe nun auch gesehen, das alle drei Wanderwege eingezeichet wurden, ich nehme auch mal an, dass das so alles stimmt. Hier kann ich ja nun sehen, wie er das gemacht hat. 
Einen schönen Tag noch
Clemens
eggie (2024-04-23 19:53:04+00:00): Welkom bij OSM..

In dat geval zou access=no beter zijn.

Vreemd.. Er loopt hier een wandelroute. Weet je hoe die route nu loopt?

Mvg
eggie
Dre026 (2024-04-23 20:13:30+00:00): Dag eggie,

Ik vind het ook een vreemde situatie. De wandelroute staat hier: https://www.visitveluwe.nl/routes-op-de-veluwe/wandelplanner (op de route van knooppunt 32 naar 77).
Ipv de Terletseweg te volgen (zoals in OSM staat), buigt de route nu af over een pad welke nog niet in OSM staat.

Ik heb via de bovengenoemde website een GPX bestandje kunnen maken van dat in OSM nog ontbrekende pad waar de route over loopt.

Met vriendelijke groet,
André
eggie (2024-04-23 20:17:11+00:00): Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 


Je bericht heb ik even doorgestuurd naar de routemaker. 
Er gaan wel meer paden in het gebied op slot om kwetsbare natuur te beschermen. 

MVG en bedankt voor de info, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Gregory Peony (2024-04-23 23:21:13+00:00): Orthogonolise building footprints by pressing 'q' for buildings with straight edges.
Upload a change set/ save your progress after a handfull of additions/changes/deletions. Submit a comment along with your changeset(when saving your progress in ID Editor) stating what you have done (since the previous save), and where appropriate why. This will mitigate the loss of your work and make your changesets easier to understand and therefore utilise.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150412477
CurlingMan13 (2024-04-24 01:27:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted in part or full.  Access tags should be used instead to control access.  Deletion is not the answer, and you can read why here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150420016
lakedistrict (2024-04-23 21:25:15+00:00): Thanks. I don't think The Range is part of this retail park; it has its own car park accessed from Duke Street and Abbey Road. The old address was probably correct, and it should also be excluded from the Hindpool Retail Park area.
gurglypipe (2024-04-23 21:43:16+00:00): Ah, thanks for spotting that, I didn’t notice the car parks were independent. Hopefully fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150416802 :)
lakedistrict (2024-04-23 21:47:44+00:00): Looks good :)
NorthCrab_upload (2024-04-23 19:40:21+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1165658910

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Violaine_Do (2024-12-03 20:06:25+00:00): Hi, could you please explain why you removed the footway here. It existed in my knowledge. Thks in advance
Lars_TheViking (2024-12-04 16:12:37+00:00): Hello Violaine_Do,

When I came across this segment it looked to me like a minor anomaly in the data.  It is a very small footway that juts out briefly before rejoining the footway it branched from (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/691327405), seemingly without leading to anything in particular.  If you have insight as to what it might be used for and think it should be included in the data again, I would be happy to add it back, otherwise it appeared to serve no purpose and made for some awkward cartography.

Thank you,

Lars
Violaine_Do (2024-12-04 21:34:47+00:00): Hi, Yes this was intentional, I think I also did the original edit. There is often steps on sidewalks so this was a wheelchair users path (low slope / access ramp). Did you changed other weird things on path / sidewalks ? (as much as you remembered, in Tahiti)
Lars_TheViking (2024-12-05 16:00:17+00:00): Hi Violaine_Do,

Thanks for your input regarding this footway.  Since you have local knowledge here I can go ahead and add this segment back in.  As for any other changes on footways or sidewalks, I do not remember any other specific examples or similar situations, as it has been several months since I reviewed this area. 

Thanks,

Lars
Violaine_Do (2024-12-05 23:14:37+00:00): Thks, no worries
CurlingMan13 (2024-04-24 01:27:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted in part or full.  Access tags should be used instead to control access.  Deletion is not the answer, and you can read why here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150420016
RicoElectrico (2024-04-24 00:30:21+00:00): Cześć!

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4212142

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4212143

Do zamknięcia?
Serrrek (2024-04-24 20:51:48+00:00): Zamknąłem
RicoElectrico (2024-04-25 08:42:10+00:00): Dzięki!
HirschKauz (2024-04-24 13:04:44+00:00): Gut gemacht! Statt zu löschen und etwas komplett Neues zu malen, hast Du hast Bestehende neu geformt. Dadurch geht die "History" eines Objekts nicht verloren :-)  
Kennst Du dies?: https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/221528565 
Grüße
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150413290
Gregory Peony (2024-04-24 00:54:36+00:00): Buildings in the changeset area and within the area of task https://tasks.hotosm.org/projects/16641/tasks/?search=1108 have not been mapped before you marked the task as complete.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150413378
NorthCrab_upload (2024-04-23 20:10:29+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/580223902

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
InsertUser (2024-04-24 00:46:58+00:00): 

If "Moore Avenue" is the proper name then the name tag should just read "Moore Avenue" and the old name can be recorded as `old_name=Piper Lane`. If it is officially "Piper Lane" but is just called "Moore Lane" by locals then "Moore Lane" can be set as `loc_name`. If this changes partway down the road then it should be split at the correct point and the individual bits named separately.

For more detail see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names
NorthCrab_upload (2024-04-23 20:10:30+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/580223903

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2024-04-23 20:10:31+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/580224061
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1165658910

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
InsertUser (2024-04-24 00:32:00+00:00): If "Moore Avenue" is the proper name then the name tag should just read "Moore Avenue" and the old name can be recorded as `old_name=Piper Lane`. If it is officially "Piper Lane" but is just called "Moore Lane" by locals then "Moore Lane" can be set as `loc_name`. If this changes partway down the road then it should be split at the correct point and the individual bits named separately. 

For more detail see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names
user_11609320 (2024-04-23 20:25:27+00:00): this is still land that is being divested
user_11609320 (2024-04-23 20:27:08+00:00): here is what they plan to do with it soon https://marchjpa.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/21039-00-A1-19.jpg
tekim (2024-04-24 00:14:32+00:00): Hello, Thanks for your edits to the map.  Unfortunately, when editing OpenStreetMap we are not allowed to use Google Earth due to Google's Terms of Service.
tekim (2024-04-24 00:14:56+00:00): Reverting a changeset that used a source that is not allowed.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150419141