piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Yog Sot (2024-12-30 15:18:36+00:00): No jest to interesujący pomysł aby tak jak imiona wrz z nazwiskami zmarłych wrzucać do osobnych relacji, a nie wszystkie ciurkiem w nazwie grobu, i podobna logika była by fajna dla drogowskazów...
Ale tak jak pisałem, OSM to projekt ogólnoświatowy, językiem wiodącym jest angielski i z tymi ludźmi musisz się dogadać. 
Ponadto gdy kasujesz nazwę z grobu, ta przestaje się wyświetlać w rozmaitych innych aplikacjach, które nie supportują formatu z relacjami, który sam wymyśliłeś. 
I to jest problem. Polska nie jest wyspą na mapie świata. To winno być rozwiązane zanim zmieniłeś te groby.
Władysław Komorek (2024-12-30 21:05:57+00:00): Proszę nie dublować i przenieść dalsze komentarze do Changeset: 160739414.

PS. Jak już wcześniej pisaliśmy, nazwa grobu jest opcjonalna i dotyczy tylko takich grobów, które mają własną nazwę.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-01-02 08:53:53+00:00): > Jest "name" jako nazwa grobu i "name" jako nazwa zmarłego, a to nie to samo.

z tym to nie protestuję

ja protestuję przeciwko usuwaniu informacji z grobów zamiast przeniesienia tej informacji w poprawny tag na grobie
(przenoszenie do wysoce kontrowersyjnych relacji NIE jest OK)

> Zresztą, ten sposób przyjął się już praktycznie na całym świecie.

który pomysł masz na myśli?

za każdym razem jak się szerszej społeczności pyta o type=person relacje to wychodzi że są traktowane jako dziwaczny niechciany wadliwy pomysł który nie powinien być w OSM, tyle że nikomu się ich kasować nie chciało
Władysław Komorek (2025-01-02 11:37:36+00:00): @Mateusz, zapoznaj się uważnie z Wiki na ten temat.
Jeśli chodzi o twoje ostatnie zdanie, to wiesz dobrze, na jakiej zasadzie powstaje i utrzymuje się wiele tagów (bez głosowania), a które przestają być używane. Oraz to, że mimo użycia ponad 1000 i wyżej, zawsze znalazło się kilka osób, którym się dany tag nie podobał, z braku zrozumienia lub z przysłowiowego szukania igły w stogu siana.
Resztę wytłumaczyłem na Discordzie.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-01-10 14:20:17+00:00): "zapoznaj się uważnie z Wiki na ten temat" - z którą częscią?

w przypadku relacji type=person reakcja była wyjątkowo negatywna
wies1 (2025-01-05 22:09:32+00:00): Hallo, danke fuer das Korrigieren meines Tippfehlers
Gruss
wies1
Vinzenz Mai (2025-01-14 22:59:28+00:00): Motiviert durch https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/building-tags-in-uk-and-ie-anyone-fancy-doing-some-deduplication/123452 hab' ich mich auf die Suche nach Tippfehlern bei uns gemacht - die mir selbstverständlich auch schon passiert sind ...

Gruss Vinzenz
StC (2024-12-29 21:36:52+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre qui passe par là. Je n'ai pas assez d'éléments pour faire la réparation moi-même : j'imagine que si le chemin 28781327 n'est plus connecté au chemin 1347040946 c'est délibéré ?
user_11609320 (2024-12-29 09:12:41+00:00): it had an overlay with the farmyard
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-12-29 11:13:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 160745112 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits by an account created to evade blocks. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17017
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-12-29 11:13:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 160745112 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits by an account created to evade blocks. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17017
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-12-29 11:13:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 160745112 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits by an account created to evade blocks. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17017
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-12-29 11:13:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 160745112 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits by an account created to evade blocks. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17017
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-12-29 11:13:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 160745112 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits by an account created to evade blocks. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17017
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-12-29 11:13:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 160745112 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits by an account created to evade blocks. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17017
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-12-29 11:13:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 160745112 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits by an account created to evade blocks. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17017
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-12-29 11:13:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 160745112 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits by an account created to evade blocks. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17017
ilias_ (2024-12-29 23:07:02+00:00): Reverted your changeset. Why would you delete the brownfield I added... which is what is left from the buildings that were destroyed?
santamariense (2025-01-21 16:45:12+00:00): Olá Jadher A,

Bem-vindo ao OSM. Tem-se por boas práticas preservar o histórico dos objetos. Neste caso, ao invés de deletar para refazer, a melhor forma de fazer a correção é melhorar as geometria e/ou rótulos existentes ao invés de excluir para criar novas. 

Bons mapeamentos!
santamariense
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-12-29 11:13:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 160745112 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits by an account created to evade blocks. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17017
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-12-29 11:13:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 160745112 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits by an account created to evade blocks. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17017
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-12-29 11:13:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 160745112 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits by an account created to evade blocks. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17017
woodpeck_repair (2024-12-29 09:48:59+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 160472356, 160475656, 160475816, 160478541, 160510222, 160510306, 160510359, 160510377, 160510447, 160510474, 160510504, 160510522, 160510540, 160510661, 160510836, 160510850, 160510856, 160510872, 160511006, 160511776, 160511876, 160511901, 160511935, 160512006, 160512100, 160512178, 160512289, 160512638, 160512717, 160517118, 160517236, 160517432, 160517582, 160517643, 160518888, 160519092, 160519656, 160519922, 160519965, 160520042, 160579377, 160579490, 160579692, 160579893, 160582316, 160582432, 160582470, 160582578, 160583006, 160583195, 160587334, 160587901, 160588117, 160588443, 160588694, 160589246, 160589665, 160589673, 160589720, 160590631, 160736708, 160736735, 160736770, 160736855, 160736863, 160736879, 160736924, 160737011, 160737027, 160737040, 160737071, 160737089, 160737149, 160737158, 160737284, 160737310, 160737390.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-12-29 11:13:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 160745112 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits by an account created to evade blocks. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17017
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-12-29 11:13:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 160745112 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits by an account created to evade blocks. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17017
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-12-29 11:13:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 160745112 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits by an account created to evade blocks. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17017
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-12-29 11:13:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 160745112 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits by an account created to evade blocks. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17017
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-12-29 11:13:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 160745112 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits by an account created to evade blocks. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17017
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-12-29 11:13:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 160745112 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits by an account created to evade blocks. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17017
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-12-29 11:13:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 160745112 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits by an account created to evade blocks. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17017
ilias_ (2024-12-29 23:04:18+00:00): I reverted your changesets. You did not just "add a bridge in A101"... you completely changed Casablanca's road system. Please stop doing that.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-12-29 11:13:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 160745112 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits by an account created to evade blocks. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17017
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-12-29 11:13:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 160745112 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits by an account created to evade blocks. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17017
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-12-29 11:13:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 160745112 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits by an account created to evade blocks. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17017
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-12-29 11:13:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 160745112 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits by an account created to evade blocks. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17017
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-12-29 11:13:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 160745112 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits by an account created to evade blocks. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17017
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-12-29 11:13:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 160745112 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits by an account created to evade blocks. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17017
Malý hajzl (2025-03-26 19:32:37+00:00): Že něco na fotkách nevidíte, neznamená, že tam neexistuje.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-12-29 11:13:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 160745112 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits by an account created to evade blocks. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17017
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-12-29 11:13:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 160745112 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits by an account created to evade blocks. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17017
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-12-29 11:13:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 160745112 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits by an account created to evade blocks. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17017
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-12-29 11:13:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 160745112 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits by an account created to evade blocks. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17017
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-12-29 11:13:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 160745112 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits by an account created to evade blocks. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17017
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-12-29 11:13:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 160745112 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits by an account created to evade blocks. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17017
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-12-29 11:13:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 160745112 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits by an account created to evade blocks. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17017
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-08 04:49:43+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164660065
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-12-29 11:13:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 160745112 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits by an account created to evade blocks. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17017
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-12-29 11:13:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 160745112 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits by an account created to evade blocks. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17017
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-12-29 11:13:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 160745112 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits by an account created to evade blocks. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17017
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-12-29 11:13:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 160745112 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits by an account created to evade blocks. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17017
silversurfer83 (2024-12-29 13:04:54+00:00): Moin :)

die Zeitspanne, die dan in Klammern steht ist eigentlich maschinenlesbar. Durch das Wort "possibly" ist das nun nicht mehr gegeben.
Solche Zusatzinfos können zB im Feld "fixme=*" hinterlassen werden. Möglicherweise so "fixme=Ende der Sperrung offen. Ab Ende März kontrollieren". Fixmes werden in einigen mobilen Apps angezeigt und auch in einigen Editoren hervorgehoben, so dass eine gewisse Sichtbarkeit für mapper gegeben ist.

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160743697
dathoschy (2024-12-29 13:36:56+00:00): Habs geändert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-12-29 11:13:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 160745112 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits by an account created to evade blocks. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17017
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-12-29 11:13:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 160745112 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits by an account created to evade blocks. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17017
StC (2024-12-29 21:40:57+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre qui passe par là. Je vais tenter la réparation, et je demanderai de l'aide s'il me manque des informations pour le faire.
maferikotupi (2024-12-29 22:42:39+00:00): Bonjour... quel itinéraire ? J'ai corrigé l'itinéraire de la Manche aux Pyrénées Pas de discontinuité normalelement
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12096538#map=10/47.4494/0.0608
StC (2024-12-30 16:24:35+00:00): Bonjour,

de mémoire c'était un problème de changement de l'ordre des membres de la relation.  Il n'y a hélas pas de message d'alerte dans JOSM pour ça.
stasiu512 (2025-01-02 14:52:06+00:00): Cześć, dlaczego tą linie oznaczyłeś jako wiadukt?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/182201547
kukułka (2025-01-06 13:53:54+00:00): Przypadkowo, punkt rozjazdu był na obrysie mostu.
Dziękuję za poprawę
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-12-29 11:13:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 160745112 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits by an account created to evade blocks. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17017
大山かなめ (2025-08-23 14:51:59+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/538624848/history/2
2024年の編集にもかかわらず、情報源が「国土数値情報（公共施設データ）平成19年 国土交通省」なのはおかしいのではと思います。
おそらく、ノードで置かれていたものを敷地に転記したものと思われますが、敷地のノードに元のノードが含まれていません。
現在は国土数値情報の利用は禁止（https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Import/Catalogue/Japan_KSJ2_Import ）のため著作権問題を疑われますから、当時適法であることを示すためにも元のノードを含めておくことを勧めます。
Langlaeufer (2025-01-10 08:42:45+00:00): Hallo MadestCat,
ein Rad- und Fußweg egal ob beschildert oder baulich erkennbar wird nicht als Fußweg erfasst. Da es gleichzeitig ein Radweg ist verwenden wir in Deutschland highway=path (Mehrzweckweg). footway wird nur für Gehwege verwendet - auch für solche die mit "radverkehr frei" für Radfahrer in Schrittgeschwindigkeit freigegeben sind. siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen_kartieren
archie (2024-12-29 11:41:41+00:00): Oh, you should not have changed that number. According to the swedish NVDB (the database of highways) this is labled as 65 and undernumber 1. This is usually ref in osm (hitherto) as E 65.1. 
There are plenty of other E NN.1 in swedish osm. Do you inted changing those too?
archie (2024-12-30 12:41:47+00:00): Hi, what about your change of  ref?
Like to carry on? Some candidats:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1170359410, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23618727,  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4535811

:-)
archie (2025-01-20 08:26:10+00:00): Hej, hur skall vi göra? Ändra tillbaka till E 65.1?
JPhoenix11 (2025-01-22 13:27:05+00:00): Hej, ursäktar för sent svar, anledningen till att jag ändrade var att denna vägen inte är skyltad som E 65.1 utan endast har det numret "formellt". Den är skyltad som E 65 så om man till exempel använder osm för navigation och den säger "fortsätt på väg E 65.1" så blir det förvirrande eftersom att den är skyltad som E 65.
archie (2025-01-22 13:39:25+00:00): Tack för ditt svar! Det allmänt accepterade tillvägagångssättet är att ta vägnumren från NVDB (i förevarande fall "E 65.1". Detta både vid manuell editering av vägar som vid import ad desamma. Sedan är en central princip i osm att inte anpassa taggningen efter hur en eller annan app eller dyl. visar objekten (don't edit for the renderer). 
Så om jag inte misstar mig på ovanstående bör cs reverteras. Vad tycker du?
JPhoenix11 (2025-02-19 13:27:11+00:00): Eftersom att den är skyltad som "E65" längs med hela sträckan, inkl E 65.1, så tycker jag att det borde vara E 65. Dock förstår jag att man vill ha med E 65.1 eftersom att det är det den egentligen heter, så man kanske kan ha med båda? Det blir väl iofs lite klottrigt, men det är väl en kompromiss isåfall.
archie (2025-02-19 14:32:18+00:00): Det är vedertagen praxis att ta med underkategorin i taggningen. Om du importerar vägen/arna från NVDB - som en hel del gör - får du teckningen/taggen inklusive underklassen; dvs E 65.1. Försök att kolla sånt innan du raderar/ändrar det. Jag reverterar.
StC (2024-12-30 18:07:43+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre qui passe par là. Je m'occupe de la réparation avec les informations dont je dispose, et je demanderai de l'aide si nécessaire.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-12-29 11:13:50+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 160710266, 160710324, 160710410, 160741453, 160741563, 160741593, 160741650, 160741708, 160741781, 160741822, 160741857, 160741887, 160742303, 160742358, 160742382, 160742489, 160742516, 160742538, 160742562, 160742628, 160742661, 160742683, 160742721, 160742737, 160742791, 160742812, 160742845, 160742910, 160742927, 160742993, 160743049, 160743082, 160743106, 160743133, 160743140, 160743146, 160743162, 160743179, 160743193, 160743201, 160743218, 160743229, 160743238, 160743253, 160743276, 160743284, 160743292, 160743299, 160743319, 160743335, 160743359, 160743374, 160743396, 160743409, 160743436, 160743450, 160743467, 160743498, 160743535, 160743565, 160743582, 160743602, 160743649, 160743661, 160743674, 160743694, 160743708, 160743727, 160743749, 160743762, 160743775, 160743790, 160743802, 160743820, 160743833, 160743874, 160743896, 160743911, 160743924, 160743934, 160743962, 160743991, 160744032, 160744050, 160744080, 160744093, 160744102, 160744111, 160744124, 160744134, 160744145, 160744160, 160744183, 160744214, 160744219, 160744231, 160744239, 160744257, 160744270, 160744286, 160744322, 160744334, 160744360, 160744374, 160744406, 160744431, 160744503, 160744523, 160744574, 160744625, 160744713, 160744764, 160744809.
Jordi MF (2024-12-30 00:27:42+00:00): Este changeset se ha revetido porque se trata de un usuario bloqueado múltiples veces por vandalismo y que trata de evadir el bloqueo: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/usuarios-editando-en-espana-bajo-sospecha-vandalismo-malas-practicas-y-otros/2510/ Por lo tanto, incumple los Términos de Uso de OSM.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160772455
Jordi MF (2024-12-30 00:27:43+00:00): Este changeset se ha revetido porque se trata de un usuario bloqueado múltiples veces por vandalismo y que trata de evadir el bloqueo: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/usuarios-editando-en-espana-bajo-sospecha-vandalismo-malas-practicas-y-otros/2510/ Por lo tanto, incumple los Términos de Uso de OSM.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160772455
joost schouppe (2025-01-03 11:32:53+00:00): Thanks for updating the hospitals around Charleroi! I've made a minor improvement: at the former Saint-Therese site, you made a relation to merge the two formerly separate sites. I merged those and kept it as a single simple polygon. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160944395
joost schouppe (2025-10-06 12:14:30+00:00): Also note that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1347060965/ is not a power plant :)
mavl (2025-02-05 14:03:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162167075 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted. Reason: wrong values for name:en - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161608012].
joost schouppe (2025-01-06 15:03:42+00:00): For https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/217383277/ it is enough if it has building=hospital (which means "this was built to be used as a hospital"). The tags amenity=hospital and healthcare=hospital mean "this is the area used by a hospital that actually exists". But that's already mapped on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1307677613 (and we don't map the same thing twice)
mavl (2025-02-05 14:02:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162167075 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted. Reason: wrong values for name:en - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161608012].
literan (2024-12-29 12:00:57+00:00): по проекту планировки мапить объекты - такое себе. Вероятность реализации в таком виде весьма невысока. На стадии проектирования наверняка все переиначат.

Я бы мапил proposed лишь когда уже проект есть
NorthCrab_upload (2024-12-29 12:01:10+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12460728643
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/285861555

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-13 00:58:30+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164876477
mavl (2025-02-05 14:02:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162167075 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted. Reason: wrong values for name:en - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161608012].
Hervé TUC (2025-11-27 20:43:07+00:00): Bonjour,

Quel était l'objectif de ces changements ?
Et vous avez transformé un objet en "Campus Francazal Nord" ici https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/917675007#map=16/43.54407/1.35990
Qu'est-ce que c'est ? Quelles sont vos sources pour créer ce campus nord ?

Cordialement
IvaLedinščak (2024-12-31 13:35:14+00:00): Reverted because of an unnecessary node #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160832916