piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Patchi (2024-01-09 07:16:53+00:00): Bonjour Monsieur GARAYT,

Quelle est la raison d'avoir transférer pour la relation TER 05 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/976032) "network=TER Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes" à "network=TER Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur" et "network:wikidata=Q41585492" à "network:wikidata=Q3512123" ?

Car le tag network:wikipedia=fr:TER Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes n'est du coup plus vraiment cohérent avec le reste. De plus il existe une ligne TER 10 (https://osm.org/relation/4502335) pour les TER Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur. A mon humble avis il s'agit d'une erreur, cette ligne de train devrait être sous le réseau TER Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes.

Bonne continuation,

Patchi
balchen (2024-04-03 11:24:22+00:00): Hei. Jeg har gjort endringer på sykkelanlegget i Langgata/St Olavs gate som jeg tegnet i sin tid og som nå hadde degenerert til g/s-vei i taggingen. Det er ikke det. Det er enveisregulert sykkelvei (anno 1990) med og uten fortau.
gscholz (2023-12-15 07:58:58+00:00): Hi Manfutu,
your recent edits have left behind several errors in the OSM database regarding duplicate nodes and self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=116.94115&lat=40.52252&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=145115623

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2023-12-17 08:08:19+00:00): Hi Manfutu, 
those errors still exist, can I get your feedback here?
Guido
arjunaraoc (2023-12-27 16:25:21+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check my update https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145583531
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145115710
gscholz (2023-12-19 08:24:12+00:00): 

Hi Manfutu,
your recent edits have left behind several errors in the OSM database regarding duplicate nodes and self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=116.97465&lat=40.51409&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=145117686

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
mapgirl@alona (2023-12-15 08:08:59+00:00): На 11 зумі є напис, який не відровідає дійсності
SomeoneElse (2024-01-10 21:18:54+00:00): Sorry for the late reply - as well as the update above, a couple of other changes were made by the administrators remove these specific examples from cache and to update things more frequently generally.  Local browser cache can be an issue for that - see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Browser_cache .
SomeoneElse (2024-01-10 21:19:14+00:00): Вибачте за пізню відповідь – крім оновлення вище, адміністратори внесли кілька інших змін, видаливши ці конкретні приклади з кешу та оновлюючи все частіше загалом. Проблемою може бути локальний кеш веб-переглядача - див. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Browser_cache .
RSydes (2023-12-24 18:48:09+00:00): I have an idea: split the garden and mansion areas from the surrounding nature reserve; tag the former as a park, the latter as a nature reserve (named Allerton Natural Area); and unite them as/within a relation.

Also, the official website calls the place "Allerton Park & Retreat Center", not "Robert Allerton Park".

I'd do this all myself, but I'm relatively new to editing OSM, so I don't want to mess something up.
Pontius (2023-12-25 08:49:54+00:00): Yeah, seems like the nature preserve portion seems to be called Allerton Natural Area. Making that a separate area seems reasonable. The wikipedia page and this book (https://www.google.com/books/edition/Inside_Allerton/uZziAQAACAAJ?hl=es) call it Robert Allerton Park. Perhaps the Park & Retreat center just refers to the central area and Robert Allerton Park refers to the whole area. Or maybe they updated the name.
Anas masuris (2023-12-16 13:02:56+00:00): Czy te mury oporowe na pewno mają taki kształt? Wydaje to się nieprawdopodobne - jeśli są to rowy wybetonowane, to spady nie powinny być oznaczone jako retaining_wall
kwiatek_123 (2023-12-16 13:57:29+00:00): hm akurat do tego zestawu zapomniałem dodać źródła ale rysowałem je z projektu. Z tego co pamiętam to są zrobione z płyty ażurowej.
mcliquid (2023-12-15 09:26:14+00:00): Hi,

just a general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
plamen (2023-12-15 14:53:43+00:00): Sorry, it is from StreetComplete, when it is not uploaded immediately
Dimitar155 (2023-12-14 18:59:00+00:00): Hi rhhs,

Is the bus stop completely removed? On the imagery it looks like the pavement for it was still there as of May 2023.

Поздрави,
Митко
rhhs (2023-12-14 19:40:59+00:00): It's completely gone, and there is a fence between the cycle path and the main street. Compare https://maps.app.goo.gl/mpMME59tgg8w6Y6D7 and https://maps.app.goo.gl/3aGhdr6vLpbaLiyS8 It's not on https://www.sofiatraffic.bg/interactivecard/ either.
Dimitar155 (2023-12-14 20:16:27+00:00): I assumed that they will leave it like they've done with https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1157841819.
> It's not on https://www.sofiatraffic.bg/interactivecard/ either.
It's hidden on the map but you can see it on their schedules website (http://schedules.sofiatraffic.bg/stop/314/zh-k-hipodruma, stop 6096 or 6135).
gscholz (2023-12-19 08:22:05+00:00): 

Hi Manfutu,
your recent edits have left behind several errors in the OSM database regarding duplicate nodes and self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=116.97465&lat=40.51409&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=145117686

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
biker-2 (2024-05-12 08:31:44+00:00): Hi Andercre, yesterday i visited ciclovia Valsugana next to Pergine, you mapped way 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1231127605. Position is not correct. Construction was visible on the position i mapped way 1281905986. Your way 1231127605 is situated on property of residents. I dont think, on this position will be a cycleway in future. can you fix it? Thank you
NorthCrab_upload (2023-12-14 15:40:25+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11417613566
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1162491265
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/324974162

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
flohoff (2023-12-14 16:45:01+00:00): Hihi,
guck dir den nochmal an.

Typo im Name

Bahnhog ;)

Passt ja auch irgendwie.

Flo
NorthCrab_upload (2023-12-14 15:40:26+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11417646485

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Fizzie-DWG (2024-01-08 03:37:42+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146013268
habib_amir (2023-12-20 08:09:42+00:00): Дорога закрыта до 5 декабря 2024 года https://gorod55.ru/news/2023-11-27/v-omske-na-levoberezhie-zakryli-uchastok-dorogi-pokazyvaem-shemy-dvizheniya-avtobusov-3110455
gscholz (2023-12-16 07:45:25+00:00): Hi Manfutu,
your recent edits have left behind several errors in the OSM database regarding duplicate nodes and self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=116.97465&lat=40.51409&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=145117686

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
tastrax (2023-12-15 05:52:52+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features 

To get the + symbol on a mobile device numeric keypad I reckon you will need to do a LONG press on the zero.
I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-14 15:16:45+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/238943661/history has lanes = 0 that was added in this edit
what was wanted to express by using lanes=0 tag?
trial (2024-08-11 16:01:15+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1231137234#map=19/47.79739/-3.50024 je n'ai pas l'impression que le commentaire corresponde : "Divers ajustements et ajots de zones forestières" : le bois ne traverse pas le mur
Sur https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1231137233 : barrier c'est pour un noeud, access=yes n'apporte rien. Mettre un point entrance à l'entrée du clos : pourquoi pas mais pas d'utilité manifeste. layer=1 : non ce n'est pas le cas sauf erreur. J'ai fait les modifs : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155110147#map=18/47.79714/-3.49866, je pense que tu as prolongé le mur trop à l'ouest, puisqu'il semble que ce soit des arbres qui délimitent à l'ouest. Es-tu d'accord ?
Mathias_ADAV (2024-02-01 09:21:29+00:00): Bonjour Simon,

est-ce que le tag cycleway = sidewalk est un tag valide ? Au vu des discussion, je ne pense pas que l'on puisse l'indiquer directement de cette manière. 
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/documenting-in-use-tag-cycleway-sidewalk-review-is-welcomed/9456

De plus l'aménagement ne figure pas dans les tag possible de cycleway 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway

Enfin, dans cette page, la situation est décrite de cette manière en S7 : 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle

Way designated for both cyclists and pedestrians, without separate spaces. Such combined footway+cycleway can be standalone or a sidewalk next to a road (in such case also footway=sidewalk is applicable)

highway=footway/highway=cycleway/highway=path + bicycle=designated + foot=designated + segregated=no + surface=* 

Donc pour ce cas là on peut faire :
cycleway = track  + footway = sidewalk + bicycle = designated + foot = designated + segregated = no 

C'est ok pour toi ?
Mathias_ADAV (2024-02-01 09:22:20+00:00): Attend je me suis trompé de cas ..!
Mathias_ADAV (2024-02-01 09:23:10+00:00): Non si c'est bon, parle de la D955 à Lecelles
simon_geovelo (2024-02-01 10:14:40+00:00): Je suis d'accord que le tag n'est pas très approprié dans ce cas la et au regard de cette page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cycleway=sidewalk?uselang=en (preconisation pour une géométrie séparé).
Je pense qu'il est même inutile les trois tags suivant décrive le trottoire cyclable :
-sidewalk:left:bicycle=yes
-sidewalk:left:segregated=no
-sidewalk:left=yes

Mais pour expliciter notamment pour les utilisateur de streetcomplete peut être qu'un cycleway=sidepath https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cycleway%3Dsidepath serait plus approprié ?

Le cycleway = track me semble vraiment excessif (ce n'est pas une piste cyclable à mon gout ;-) )
Mathias_ADAV (2024-02-12 11:03:24+00:00): Désolé je n'ai pas pris le temps de te répondre, je ne connaissais pas le tag sidepath. De ce que je comprends c'est plus pour indiquer qu'il y-a un aménagement plutôt que de taguer l'aménagement lui même.

On est d'accord que cet aménagement est loin d’être qualitatif et heureusement on en fait plus des comme ça !  Mais il existe de part sa signalétique et fait bien partie du linéaire géré par le département, on ne peut donc pas le faire disparaitre comme ça..  Je pense qu'indiquer que la piste est mixée avec le trottoir (segregated = no) est le plus représentatif et évite de faire appel à des tags "exotique" qui rendent difficile l'exploitation des données dernière !
ivanbranco (2024-05-30 20:46:44+00:00): Un parcheggio con 0 posti? Cosa intendevi?
joecow (2024-05-31 07:56:13+00:00): Un svista. Ho corretto togliendo il numero dei posti, visto che non so quanti ci ne siano.
Elian D (2023-12-22 21:03:37+00:00): @PLGedit, in https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11417766348 you have added a `place=village` with the name "Gáborok pataka".

Can you please confirm the existence of this village? I was not able to identify it. Also the name translated with Google Translate is "Gáborok stream" (doesn't sound like the name of a village).

In the meantime I've downgraded it to a `place=hamlet` since I don't think it's an official location.
Allison P (2023-12-14 22:52:43+00:00): It's called B Bar S Lane, not B Bar South Lane
deweyjungles (2023-12-19 21:44:11+00:00): I am finding conflicting information from multiple sites such as zillow and others. This could be reviewed by another.
Allison P (2023-12-19 23:19:07+00:00): Not good sources. Many lead back to the same source. They have made the same expansion mistake as you. I know the area, the sign says "B Bar S Ln" with S clearly being part of the name
SomeoneElse (2025-12-13 23:17:05+00:00): Re https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/clarifying-default-bicycle-access-on-highway-footway-and-highway-pedestrian/139023/124 , https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/osm-deep-history/#/way/240214608 et al now have "bicycle=dismount; foot=no".  I've no idea what is correct but that is an implausible combination (I've also said this on the changeset by the other recent editor).
Nathan_A_RF (2025-12-14 00:03:01+00:00): I've never been sure either. Cyclists and pedestrians are prohibited across The Thames, but a cycle shuttle service can take cyclists across free of charge on request, hence the 'dismount'. Feel free to change, I didn't put that tag there initially, but have kept consistency on the route the cycle shuttle runs.
SomeoneElse (2025-12-14 00:49:17+00:00): Actually https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163106660 (by a different mapper, ages ago) looks odd too.
emersonveenstra (2023-12-16 14:07:55+00:00): Hi there,

You created an untagged way here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1231151558

Could you go back and tag it? Thanks!
hulocal (2023-12-15 09:33:46+00:00): Reverted because the city blocks itself don't improve map readabilty (no square letters).

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145142896
Manonjds (2023-12-15 08:27:55+00:00): Bonjour, 

Merci pour votre modification. 
Est-il possible de mettre "l'accueil du Jardin des sciences" à la place de "Le Jardin des sciences" ? 

Merci à vous
silversurfer83 (2023-12-18 20:03:01+00:00): Hi :)

ich stolpere gerade über diese Änderung und hätte da zwei Artikel im OpenStreetMap Wiki, auf die ich dich gerne hinweisen möchte und deren Beachtung durch dich ich sehr begrüßen würde.

Zum Einen hast du hier eine Kleinigkeit in Goslar und eine in Ennepetal (glaube ich) geändert. Das erzeugt ein Rechteck über halb Deutschland was eine Kontrolle der Änderung etwas erschwert:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Und dann ist dein Kommentar (nicht nur dieser) leider nichtssagend. Wir sehen nicht was du getan hast und wir wissen nicht, woher du die Informationen hast (Quellenangabe). Da ist dieser Artikel hoffentlich hilfreich:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

Ich wünsche weiter viel Spaß an der Karte, eine hoffentlich stressarme Weihnachtszeit und freue mich auf viele weitere Beiträge bei OSM von dir :)

silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145121196
lefuturiste (2023-12-18 21:51:25+00:00): Salut, merci pour ta contrib'
Est-ce que tu peut expliquer qu'est ce que ce polygone, pourquoi  area:highway=yes ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1231159326
Yherisson (2023-12-18 22:32:52+00:00): un fausse manipulation, j'ai du tenter un truc, puis tout annuler à coup de control-z mais j'ai du faire un control-z de moins que ce qu'il fallait
j'ai delete
Benoît C MdP (2023-12-15 08:04:26+00:00): Bonjour Ardin

Il y a bien une bande cyclable sur l'avenue du parc des Princes. Je corrige en conséquence.

Bonne continuation. 

Benoît
uᴉʍOꓨ (2023-12-15 10:44:07+00:00): Good job! Thank you for helping make a better map on OSM, and welcome to the community!

If you're keen to know fellow contributors, or if you have any questions, check out the various community channels where local contributors hangout: https://osm.org/wiki/PH.
Fizzie-DWG (2024-01-08 03:36:47+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146013254
EneaSuper (2024-01-28 10:33:09+00:00): Ciao Sconosciutto, come mai hai deciso di declassare i tag delle SS e SP che attraversano questi paesi?
gscholz (2023-12-15 08:07:13+00:00): Hi jozin-belgium,
this changeset has created several errors in the OSM database regarding duplicate nodes and self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=5.40312&lat=51.19236&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=145122464

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Xvtn (2023-12-15 23:16:57+00:00): Hi, thanks for your contribution! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes. Everything looks good to me - no problems! Happy mapping.
Glassman (2023-12-15 20:19:17+00:00): The tags date_off and date_on have been deprecated.  See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Conditional_restrictions for more information.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145123248
muchichka_s (2023-12-15 14:56:52+00:00): Привіт
Ці карти використовуються в тому числі школярами, тому назвам з лайкою тут не місце. В будь-якій програмі можна зробити особисті закладки з своїми назвами

Я видаляю цю назву і дуже сподіваюся на твоє майбутнє розуміння ситуації
Mostafa Ahangarha (2023-12-14 18:41:57+00:00): بر اساس بررسی مجددی که ساعتی پیش از این تغییر به عمل آمد، این بخش از خیابان به طور دائمی حذف شده است.
در صورت نیاز می‌توانم ویدئویی که از محل ضبط کرده‌ام را نیز به اشتراک بگذارم.
citrula (2023-12-15 04:24:56+00:00): Hi, did you mean to delete the buildings in the Landmark section?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145123629
Anas masuris (2023-12-22 17:22:45+00:00): Hej, trzeba pouzupełniać jeszcze stany wyświetlane na semaforach i sygnalizatorach.

Na sygnalizatorach powtarzających należy w ref=* umieścić pełne oznaczenie np. ISpE3, IISpG2 itp. plus wyświetlane sygnały.

Podobnie na semaforach wjazdowych, wyjazdowych i drogowskazowych. Plus chyba w niektórych są pochrzanione kierunki.

W dokumentacji, którą masz, powinny być pokazane kolory komór semaforów - na podstawie tego dasz radę uzupełnić sygnały
Anas masuris (2023-12-22 17:23:13+00:00): Jak coś, to proszę pisać - pomogę :)
kwiatek_123 (2023-12-22 18:04:48+00:00): Ok, pełne ref wstawię.

Mówisz, że coś nie tak z kierunkami? Przejrzę jeszcze raz.

W dokumentacji jest tylko liczba komór i oznaczenie semafora więc tam, gdzie nie jestem w stanie wywnioskować jakie są sygnały ich nie nie wstawiałem.

Jesteś może na discordzie OSM Polska?
Anas masuris (2023-12-22 18:11:22+00:00): Nie, na discordzie nie jestem. Nie masz tam w dokumentacji SRK?
kwiatek_123 (2023-12-22 19:30:55+00:00): Jest ale bez żadnych konkretów większych
kwiatek_123 (2023-12-23 14:01:00+00:00): Poprawiłem kierunki (źle zrozumiałem tag direction 😅)

Dodałem brakujące ref na powtarzalnych.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145438224

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145438224
Anas masuris (2023-12-23 14:12:32+00:00): Git, po prędkościach na rozjazdach częściowo można się domyślić, jakie sygnały tam są - ale ofc najdokładniej to pozostaje obserwacja miejsca (strasznie męczące xd)

Uzupełni się w przyszłości kiedyś tam xd
SpinOff (2024-01-03 00:39:05+00:00): Hej. Walidator JOSMa zgłasza błąd, że tag layer=0 jest zbędny. Jest jakiś konkretny powód dla którego warto go zostawić?
kwiatek_123 (2024-01-03 07:31:12+00:00): Z tego co pamiętam to layer jest dodany tylko pod wiaduktem Marsa i dodałem ten tag aby odróżnić czy coś znajduje się pod wiaduktem (layer=0) czy na nim (layer=1)
ljmaps (2023-12-14 20:50:01+00:00): Hello, test 4
Mannivu (2023-12-14 21:26:12+00:00): Capisco l'area di servizio, ma perché eliminare le corsie di ingresso e uscita al casello? Sono separate fisicamente, rappresentarle con un'unica way per direzione di percorrenza mi sembra errato.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145124634
Anonix35 (2023-12-15 07:43:58+00:00): Questo è ciò che consiglia il wiki di Openstreetmap.
Ho sempre visto solo un'unica way per direzione al casello indicando il numero di corsie.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Tag:barrier%3Dtoll_booth
Mannivu (2023-12-15 07:49:02+00:00): Questo non lo sapevo, ma vedo che è in contrasto con la versione inglese della stessa pagina https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dtoll_booth
Devo capire se è stata tradotta male la nostra o nel tempo è stata ampliata quella inglese
Anonix35 (2023-12-15 08:01:05+00:00): In effetti, è strano, perché ho guardato alcuni caselli nel Regno Unito e vanno bene con un'unica way.
Anche la maggior parte dei pedaggi in Francia e Austria hanno un solo segmento.
C'è solo il traforo del Fréjus e del Monte Bianco che abbiamo realizzato tutte le corsie.
Mannivu (2023-12-15 08:09:14+00:00): Sì, la wiki infatti dice che non è necessario, ma è possibile farlo. Io li avevo mappati separati principalmente perché c'è una barriera in mezzo e perché le tre corsie avevano caratteristiche differenti (per esempio per i mezzi pesanti è consigliata la corsia più a destra), è perché mi sembrava più attinente alla realtà.
Anonix35 (2023-12-15 08:18:28+00:00): In questo caso puoi usare "hgv:lanes=yes" che indicherà che la corsia più a destra è quella riservata ai mezzi pesanti.
Mannivu (2023-12-15 14:55:10+00:00): Mi sembra una mappatura meno precisa di prima, ma meglio di niente.
silversurfer83 (2023-12-18 17:25:03+00:00): Gude

keine Quelle, kein Kommentar aber ein laut Luftbild mindestens durch einen Parkstreifen von der Straße getrennten Bürgersteig gelöscht.
Warum?
(Ich kann nicht hell sehen, daher muss ich fragen)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145124662