piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
TheBestIdea (2025-12-29 20:24:02+00:00): Hey Valaise,
Sorry for the delay in responding. 
At 230th St, the bike route goes up on the sidewalk a bit before the intersection on both sides. It follows the pedestrian crossings via a dogleg on a new refuge island in the middle of the intersection.
Check out p 17 of this pdf for details: https://www.nyc.gov/html/dot/downloads/pdf/bailey-ave-van-cortlandt-park-s-w225-st.pdf
Here is the street-level imagery I was looking at from halfway through implementation in Sept 2025 (so cars are parked in the bike lane on both sides): https://roadview.planninglabs.nyc/view/-73.9039671/40.8763321
There are additional photos (showing both sides of the intersection (though not really in the middle) in this Reddit post: https://www.reddit.com/r/NYCbike/comments/1pe1oq6/i_have_a_good_feeling_about_this/
-Brandon
lostmike (2025-10-15 09:34:17+00:00): There is no sign here with the admission price.
Would you like to update the node to show the actual information?
Also move it to the correct location.
Bondi Maps (2025-10-16 19:52:43+00:00): Consulta. Es necesario quitar el "B°"?

Es entendible que no especifiquemos cuando se trata de una localidad o barrios de CABA (porque, normalmente, son conocidas) o cuando va a una estación de tren (no hace falta poner "estación tal" porque se sobreentiende), pero cuando se trata de un barrio, hay tanta cantidad de barrios en el conurbano que uno no se los aprende todos, y si no está esa especificación, no se entiende si se habla de un barrio, una calle, un local, etc.

Incluso yo que tengo una obsesión por los bondis no entiendo bien a que se refieren algunas carteleras (y me paso horas investigando y deduciendo para ver que quieren decir), por eso me parece que es información que puede resultar útil al usuario. 

Además, la abreviatura "B°" se suele usar para referirse a un barrio y se entiende. Cuentas como Ciudad de Bondis lo usan. Y no es innecesariamente largo o molesto.

Nuevamente, disculpame por no responderte a lo de Telegram, tengo parcial el sábado y ando muy ocupado.
AgusQui (2025-10-16 21:47:33+00:00): En OSM no abreviamos, en especial en tag name=*, poner "Barrio..." quedaría muy largo, pero no habría problema en agregarlo. También (no recuerdo si esta línea tiene otro ramal) se podría poner Villa Udaondo → Ituzaingó Sur
Bondi Maps (2025-10-16 22:34:12+00:00): Entiendo. Osea, en tal caso de que quiera nombrar algún barrio, en vez de nombrarlo como "B° tal" lo nombro como "Barrio tal"?

Y con respecto a tu sugerencia, al menos en estos casos prefiero poner el nombre del barrio, ya que "Villa Udaondo" es muy amplio e "Ituzaingó Sur" de por si es un barrio de Ituzaingó, y el recorrido termina en un barrio más abajo (Iparraguirre).
i2004 (2025-10-15 13:32:33+00:00): me ayudas a ordenar los recorridos de las lineas 10 70 24 39 46 168 29 53 93 74 porque tengo medio desordenados los recorridos a la altura de martin garcia y tambien de la 152 197 33 64  29 53 a la altura de almirante brown
user_5359 (2025-10-15 06:37:34+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You only add a node without any description.
a typical surveillance camera node has the following keys (all values are example).
camera:type=fixed
man_made=surveillance
manufacturer=Flock Safety
manufacturer:wikidata=Q108485435
surveillance=camera
surveillance:type=ALPR
ajashton (2025-10-15 20:08:33+00:00): It's not. My edit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163104173 was intended to mark it closed but apparently there was a bug in the Every Door at the time that I did not realize left it in a confusing state https://github.com/Zverik/every_door/issues/905

All of the old CVS signage is completely removed now so I changed it to shop=vacant https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173336649
Dissident93 (2025-10-15 22:34:01+00:00): Glad to see it sorted out, hopefully that bug wasn't too widespread.
AngocA (2026-02-19 03:05:15+00:00): Hola Luis,

Una corrección en Colombia no hay Toll_gantry, sino toll_booth.
ieguy3 (2025-10-15 04:49:15+00:00): it has been gone since 2020. they have no plans on restoring service due to lack of funds. they also didn't properly promote it. service to from needles to Barstow is via a special program that allows reimbursement. effectively rideshare
ieguy3 (2025-10-15 04:50:34+00:00): https://vvta.org/flex/needles/
Mevess (2026-06-28 09:54:14+00:00): Salut !
Le nom de la rue située plus au sud est Rue RunEUnou et il n'y a pas le "de".
quel est le vrai nom ?
Merci !
Glassman (2026-02-24 01:02:01+00:00): I know this is a old edit,  but instead of deleting the old feature, just adjust the polygon and add/corrects the tags. That saves the history of the object.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173301159
samho1234567 (2025-10-15 06:29:42+00:00): Please be aware of the spelling of "Block".
mueschel (2025-10-18 16:20:04+00:00): Hi,
please check all the objects you uploaded here. None of them as any common tag like 'amenity' or 'shop'.
NeisBot (2025-10-15 05:39:40+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-10-18 11:07:05+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/173303838
FajrAl (2026-06-23 10:33:32+00:00): semua PoI ini tidak akan di-render karena belum ada tag yang sesuai. Mohon konsultasikan dengan komunitas
skfd (2025-10-15 05:53:38+00:00): i think you deleted new part of the building that replaced the parking. i think its operational and not just construction
maxwellward (2025-10-15 06:51:03+00:00): If you mean the construction on the north side, it was previously attached to the hotel building, so it would have been incorrect if it was still listed as a building anyway (as the new construction has a gap between the buildings).

If possible could you survey the area and find out what the new building is? Should be as simple as updating the construction area back into a building when we know what it is. Footprint may need to be slightly adjusted.
skfd (2025-10-15 13:17:03+00:00): i added it from phone when walking by. its a new wing of the same hotel, it's massive!
maxwellward (2025-10-15 17:29:22+00:00): Sounds good, thanks! I've updated it based on the half completed state in the aerials, once new aerials are available it can be updated to be more accurate. Thanks for the information!
skfd (2025-10-15 18:16:08+00:00): thank you!! 🫡
mavl (2025-11-23 07:40:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 175015324 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible source - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18891].
LordGarySugar (2026-04-03 16:11:20+00:00): Hi, the geoglyph sections were tagged with building:part as they are painted on the roof of the building and can be represented as part of the building. You can see how the building appears in 3D here: https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=-39.0588860&lon=174.0716730&zoom=21
For that reason, I've reverted your changes in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180654160 to be consistent with other geoglyph mapping. Hope that's ok.
NeisBot (2025-10-15 06:30:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description
NeisReview (2025-10-18 11:06:13+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/173445013
Bartek444 (2025-10-15 18:17:05+00:00): standardowo budynek zachowuje kąty proste. Ten budynek jest większy i ma inny kształt. Poprawiłem.
NeisBot (2025-10-15 06:57:40+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-10-18 11:05:38+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/173444996
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-16 00:22:36+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10805414441
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1161799615

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.

"Stary Gromadzyn":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13234014399
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13234057610
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13234057642

"Czerwone":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13234057674

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Grass-snake (2025-10-15 18:06:04+00:00): Здравствуйте, обращаю внимание:

- тип дороги указывается в зависимости от важности, здесь highway=residential или unclassified вполне достаточно:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Highway_classification
(см. вторую половину страницы).

- статусная часть дороги (улица, шоссе, проезд, проспект, …) указывается со стройной буквы, даже если идёт в начале названия,  см. Соглашение об именовании дорог:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BE%D0%B1_%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3

Уточните пожалуйста, почему Вы указали, что никто не может пройти и проехать по этой дороге?  В открытых источниках не смог найти информацию, возможно запрет указан ошибочно.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-03-30 19:43:07+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10706033605/history - is this building=vacant applying to the entire https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/62302106/history ?

Or is only space of this address vacant?
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2026-03-31 07:10:01+00:00): Bonjour, cela ne s'appliquait que au magasin qui a déménagé, le way englobe aussi le 112 rue bugeaud. Bonne journée
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-05-04 07:10:40+00:00): Then https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10706033605/history should be shop=vacant - right?
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2026-05-05 07:20:20+00:00): Bonjour, oui tout à fait, c'est modifié. Bonne journée
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-05-05 07:52:36+00:00): Thanks!
dcapillae (2025-10-15 07:42:02+00:00): No es una importación. Edición manual para añadir barreras y números de portal conforme a Catastro, PNOA Spain y CDAU.
Dimitar155 (2025-10-17 17:07:55+00:00): Частично върната.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173420880
kenken234 (2025-10-15 08:05:00+00:00): Forgot i made edits around Bishan as well in this changeset
alexswilliams (2025-10-15 21:12:24+00:00): Hello, Hamko's appeared to be open yesterday when I walked past, did this get caught up with the bus stop?
alexswilliams (2025-10-15 21:14:23+00:00): Ah, I saw your fixup, apologies, ignore me :)
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-12 10:20:27+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/228135972/history - czy ta budowa jest skończona czy to kolejny wandalizm Temat-Droga?
eggie (2025-10-15 08:42:29+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Fraxi (2025-10-15 08:50:24+00:00): Използван за малко и Bing Streetside...
NeisBot (2025-10-15 08:54:40+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description
user_5359 (2025-10-16 07:16:38+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You only added a description (more SPAM as clear description) and a website but did not note that there is also a business there.   If you do not know the spelling of the tag, please look it up in the wiki https://wiki.osm.org.
NeisReview (2025-10-18 11:05:02+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/173350646
coteyka (2025-10-15 17:16:41+00:00): I'm so sorry for this changeset, i accidentally edited one natural=wood polygon
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-16 00:22:37+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1204807594

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
silversurfer83 (2025-10-21 07:17:12+00:00): Hi :)

in dieser Änderung hast du drei POI (Rewe, Rossmann,...) von eigenen nodes auf Gebäudeumrisse gelegt.

Dieses Vorgehen ist in meinen Augen eher ungünstig, in diesem speziellen Fall sogar sehr ungünstig. a) möchten wir OSM-Objekte voneinander getrennt halten. D.h. der Laden und das Gebäude sind für uns zwei unterschiedliche Objekte, deren Eigenschaften auch getrennt voneinander erfasst werden sollten. Daher sind eigene Punkte oder ggf. eigene Flächen, die die realen Ausmaße eines POI anzeigen, besser. b) du hast einen großen Haufen tags einfach nicht übernommen bei deiner Übertragung und damit Informationen für Datennutzer entfernt. 

Unabhängig davon sieht viel von dem, was du aktuell machst, schon ganz gut aus :)

happy mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173309827
Rudolf Mayer (2025-10-25 17:18:51+00:00): Why would DN69a not be a trunk road, like e.g. DNVTM, or DN6, etc?
lawrencebanks (2025-10-26 08:31:47+00:00): DNVTM is a trunk road only from DN59 to DN6-A1 in the absence of any express road or motorway (the future A9) - as Romania has express roads now and motorways usually take the trunk traffic from the national roads (see DN69 Timisoara-Arad, DN7 Arad-Deva, all national roads around Bucharest) - DN69A is not an express way nor a main trunk road at the moment
user_5359 (2025-10-18 08:45:37+00:00): Hello! Why did you change a key building to A on seven ways?
mavl (2025-11-15 10:56:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 174681717 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-16 00:22:42+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1442302825

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eggie (2025-10-15 10:12:05+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
MusicForMellons (2025-10-15 11:23:19+00:00): Nice,  Dankjewel!
Mannivu (2025-10-15 14:40:14+00:00): Ciao, grazie per la modifica. Ti faccio solo notare che con la modifica che hai fatto hai aggiunto un nome all'edificio, non all'azienda. Ma nessun problema, sistemo io.
Mannivu (2025-10-15 14:40:27+00:00): Ciao, grazie per la modifica. Ti faccio solo notare che con la modifica che hai fatto hai aggiunto un nome all'edificio, non all'azienda. Ma nessun problema, sistemo io
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173311670
gscscnd (2025-10-17 15:40:43+00:00): Tu się nie do końca zrozumieliśmy. Zerknij w tagi. Jeżeli jest maxspeed=50 (i maxspeed:type=sign), to wszystkie pozostałe do tego nie pasują. Coś trzeba skasować.
gscscnd (2025-10-17 15:39:16+00:00): Dzięki. Zachęcam do zaglądania na Wiki (angielską), żebyś lepiej rozumiał różnice między tym co narysowałeś/otagowałeś, a tym co podpowiadam. Oraz do zadawania pytań — na forum lub na stronach dyskusji Wiki.
trial (2025-10-18 12:19:46+00:00): Bonjour, même remarques que pour les autres concessionnaires.
L29Ah (2025-10-15 23:47:07+00:00): You've added a building with layer=1, is it really a building that sits on top of all the existing buildings in the polygon?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173312509
user_5359 (2025-10-16 10:19:51+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2dM7. You add the new key cave:ref:it:FST. Is there a reason for the prefix cave? And shouldn't the component it be written in capital letters (to indicate the country rather than the language)?
simo_explorer (2025-10-16 12:01:45+00:00): Hi! I'm working on the caves in my region, thank you for checking. I followed this scheme: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cave#Cave:ref_and_variants
FST = "Federazione Speleologica Toscana"
gscholz (2025-11-15 07:15:20+00:00): Hi Alice Cerrato,
this changeset has created several errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=8.02211&lat=44.64230&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges

As you may know, this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps. Can you please fix this?

You may also like to educate yourself about how to edit hiking routes properly:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hiking

Kind regards
Guido
Nakaner-repair (2026-03-06 17:36:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 179457471 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by Alice Cerrato. This is proper cleanup after a couple of incomplete fixes by TomTom staff and user gscholz.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-10-19 02:18:52+00:00): This changeset removed a section of freeway.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173312912
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-10-19 02:19:50+00:00): reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173473011
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-10-19 02:24:24+00:00): How are these "unnecessary" nodes determined?
MarkoŠatrak (2025-10-19 09:36:34+00:00): Hi @Spaghetti Monster🍝,

I’m writing as the project lead for the OptimoRoute organised editing activity
(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities/OptimoRoute).

Thanks for spotting this and fixing it so quickly. We use osm-revert, we’ll review what happened on our side.

For context on our workflow and what we mean by “unnecessary nodes”:
1. Our organised editing activity focuses on editing tags on existing ways.
2. Every changeset is reviewed by another team member.
3. We have a general rule: no geometry changes (no modifications to the layout of ways, we only split a way when we need to tag just a specific segment).
4. Nodes should never be created in our activity (we split at existing nodes). Any added node is treated as an unnecessary geometry change and will be reverted, hence the “unnecessary node” comment.

Apologies for the noise, and thank you again for the quick correction. If you notice anything else, please let us know.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-10-19 13:13:55+00:00): My suggestions:
1. Avoid using advanced tools like reverters except to revert damage. (extra nodes are not damage.)
2. Remove "4. Nodes should never be created in our activity (we split at existing nodes). Any added node is treated as an unnecessary geometry change and will be reverted, hence the “unnecessary node” comment." from your guidelines. It's a broad rule that doesn't provide any meaningful quality assurance.
MarkoŠatrak (2025-10-21 08:33:45+00:00): Thanks, @Spaghetti Monster🍝, for the comments.
We have been using osm-revert in the project for almost a year and have not had issues with it. We investigated this case and it appears a team member accidentally created a node and later split the way at that node. Reverting the node also reverted the way created by that split.

We have added extra checks to our guidelines so the effects of any fixes are understood before they are applied.
Frans S (2025-10-24 14:23:51+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
All issues shown by the error triangle should be solved before you upload your mappings.

A: Inaccurate mapping. 
B: Overlapping buildings.

C: Collecting adjacent buildings and mapped it as 1 building.

D: Connecting Nodes to other features.

E: Buildings not squared or rounded.
G: Included the shadow of the building.
High building(s) incorrect mapped. 
Check this footage how to map high buildings

https://youtu.be/dsfUcslLtVc?si=yH6eWDbsb_ILAVb9
 Or See par 20 chapter About Buildings


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
Frans S (2025-10-24 14:28:05+00:00): Hi. Another issue
Images are taken under a certain degree so you see both the roof and a siding.
A gable roof has a bend at its highest point. Map this roof as a single rectangular object because, when viewed from directly above, the roof is rectangular.
Best regards
dmjab13 (2025-10-15 20:40:01+00:00): please try and keep edits to one continent
StangyBee (2025-10-16 08:12:50+00:00): Holdup, what??
silversurfer83 (2025-10-16 16:05:00+00:00): Hi StangyBee,

dmjab13 wrote because you (unintentionally, I'm sure) moved this node
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3108547584
in northern Europe which results in a huge bounding box for your changeset which now pops up in oh so many feeds of people keeping an eye on their neighbourhood which can be a bit annoying to them.

What's more important:

Yours tracks: They don't look abandoned to me. The aerials give "razed:railway=*" at best. If it where up to me I wouldn't even map them.

Please don't add gauges as if they where still real. Also: There are no crossings so do not add crossings to those razed rails where they used to cross a street.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_map_historic_events_and_historic_features

cheers