piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
CurlingMan13 (2024-10-26 07:31:53+00:00): good edit
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158355267
gscholz (2024-12-04 09:05:27+00:00): Hi cyril31,
your recent changesets have left behind a lot of errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=1.86911&lat=47.89423&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas

As you may know, this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps. 
Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
cyril31 (2024-12-11 19:11:36+00:00): it's good now
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-10 18:44:10+00:00): Hello!

You used
access=no-
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/14415831/history

Have you maybe meant
access=no
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?
aceman444 (2025-05-14 22:04:17+00:00): Hi, thanks for updating the Sala bus lines. Hopefully the changes are correct.

But why are you removing the 'sadds:id' tags that contain the bus operator ID number of the bus line (they should probably be arriva:id (or ref:arriva) now). In later changesets you even remove the numbers from the 'description' tags where you moved them here.
Szymson (2024-10-26 14:57:43+00:00): Skąd informacja że to centrum budowlane? Tam będzie Mrówka, Lidl i budynek mieszkalny z lokalami komercyjnymi na parterze.
czebureks (2024-10-27 13:10:56+00:00): Taki szyld widnieje na budowie, przy wjeździe od strony ul. PCK. Ale jeżeli posiadasz takie informacje, to oczywiście zaproponowana przez Ciebie nazwa jest bardziej trafna.
Szymson (2024-10-27 17:25:21+00:00): Generalnie po zakończonej budowie pewnie i tak przeniesie się nazwę placu budowy do tagu 'description'. Na potwierdzenie moich wcześniejszych słów zamieszczam wizualizacje ze strony Eurobud'u:

https://eurobud.gda.pl/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/widok-na-kolej-scaled.jpg

https://eurobud.gda.pl/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/parking-scaled.jpg

https://eurobud.gda.pl/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/witryny1-scaled.jpg

https://eurobud.gda.pl/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/witryny2-scaled.jpg

https://eurobud.gda.pl/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/witryny3-scaled.jpg

https://eurobud.gda.pl/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/wjazd-scaled.jpg
felipeeugenio (2024-10-27 00:28:19+00:00): Hola. Cual es la fuente para este nombre?
saludos
arcanma (2024-10-26 17:42:52+00:00): Ciao foxy23, sono le tue prime modifiche e già la segnalazione è importante per aggiornare la mappa, se vuoi fare da solo in questi casi, dato che la struttura è rimasta ma non c'è più l'attività, va messo disused:leisure=resort, vedi https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
C'era anche un errore di battitura in restaurant :)
une abeille (2024-10-25 23:16:28+00:00): To indicate that a section of sidewalk is of poor smoothness, you can cut it from the main section (add nodes at the transition points by double-clicking, then press X) and change its smoothness value. Please do not use `name=` for smoothness data.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:smoothness
gscholz (2024-12-04 09:05:31+00:00): Hi cyril31,
your recent changesets have left behind a lot of errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=1.86911&lat=47.89423&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas

As you may know, this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps. 
Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
cyril31 (2024-12-04 13:14:11+00:00): Sorry, I check today
cyril31 (2024-12-11 19:10:49+00:00): Ok it's solve
szydzio (2024-10-29 10:15:19+00:00): Cześć!
Czy rozpoczęła się fizycznie budowa tej obwodnicy?
Zwróć proszę uwagę, że samo wydanie decyzji środowiskowej jeszcze nie uzasadnia highway=construction.
szydzio (2024-10-29 10:32:08+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:construction => "Use this key to denote active construction sites (for projects being planned, where there is little or no evidence of them on the ground, avoid tagging them or use proposed=* instead)."
BartekGa (2024-10-29 11:23:40+00:00): Są już pierwsze wykopy na zaprojektowanej trasie, prace przy linii kolejowej, przygotowanie pasa.
Prace zapewne nabiorą tempa w czasie, będę monitorował postępy, może uda się wykonać nalot dronem w celu zwiększenia dokładności.
eggie (2024-10-26 20:01:46+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-10-26 20:26:10+00:00): Is dat deel van de fietsrotonde aan de westzijde nog wel aanwezig?
Zie
https://viewer.satellietdataportaal.nl/@52.29132,5.270656,19/?datastrip=20241015_SVNEO-01

MVG
eggie
mgerken (2024-10-28 09:50:04+00:00): Moin,

als Operator steht in der Relation "Stadt Achim", aber das wird ja wahrscheinlich nicht stimmen, oder? Die liegt ja vollständig auf Langwedeler Gebiet.

Beste Grüße
tof99 (2024-10-28 22:27:07+00:00): ...Danke für den Hinweis, und Du hast natürlich recht - Betreiber ist der Flecken Langwedel, und hier der Tourismusverein (schon korrigiert). Es gibt sogar eine eigene Seite und ein pdf zum Download.
felipeeugenio (2024-10-26 15:30:53+00:00): Hola. Marcó el centro de rehabilitación como si fuera una escuela. Es una escuela realmente? o es un centro de rehabilitación?
me1kimu (2024-10-26 16:02:04+00:00): No tengo certeza de ese dato, así que mantuve la categoría original del nodo. Solo agregué sitio web y código WIkidata
OvdLeur (2024-10-25 22:34:30+00:00): Aanvullend commentaar:
Inrichting keuzes zijn mijn interpretatie van het advies van eggie in changeset 158307097 en het doorspitten van de wiki.
In map paint style 'Sidewalks and footways (with knobs on)' lijkt de voetganger routing goed te zijn.
Twijfelpunten:
1. De oversteek in de bocht met de Looyenbeemd; is dit de juiste manier? (overgang ziet er wat raar uit omdat de Looyenbeemd geen apart gemapte footways en formele oversteekplaats heeft
2. De bocht met gesplitste rijbanen in de Wekkerstraat; is de tag foot=use_sidepath daar juist toegepast?
Note: ik gebruik deze weg om te oefenen met (J)OSM, dus bij voorbaat dank aan de reviewer voor je oordeel en geduld! 😁
eggie (2024-10-26 20:37:08+00:00): Toch even gekeken.
Ik denk dat er geen oversteek mer een highway=crossing is in die bocht.
Zodra de groenstrook ontbreekt kun je het trottoir gewoon aansluiten op het dichtsbijzijnde punt van de hoofdrijbaan. Denk het beste ook op de fietsoversteek. 
De highway=crossing kan weg.
Alleen gebruiken als er belijning is getekend op de weg.

Het noordelijke higway=footway zou je ook  kunnen laten aansluiten op die fietpadoversteek. 
Dan klopt de routering weer.
In de T kruising kan dan overal foot=use_sidepath verwijderd worden.

Reden. Probeer maar eens over te steken in de routering. Dat lukt nu niet.

Review verzoeken komen eigenlijk niet binnen bij medemappers. 
Dat is alleen te vinden in de tool van Pascal Neis.
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?country=189&hours=96&mappingdays=-1&tsearch=review_requested%3Dyes&anyobj=t&comp=%3E&value=10&action=d&obj=n#8/52.349/5.441

'k Denk dat het meer gepromoot kan worden.
Groet
eggie
eggie (2024-10-26 20:44:38+00:00): Hier kun je zien hoe edits op een dag van tips en/of actie van andere mappers zijn voorzien.
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussions?c=Netherlands#7/52.093/5.180

Ook heel leerzaam.
OvdLeur (2024-10-27 08:58:32+00:00): Dank voor je review, adviezen en tips ondanks je bbhh!

Highway=crossing snap ik, pas ik zo aan.

Voorstel voor de bocht met de gesplitste rijbanen (die bedoel je met T-kruising ga ik vanuit).

Oostelijke deel: ik laat de footway direct na de groenstrook bij het puntstuk op de weg aansluiten en oostelijke enkele rijbaan krijgt sidewalk=right ipv foot=use_sidepath. Redenering; voetgangers dienen niet het fietspad te gebruiken om over te steken maar kunnen dat dan wel doen bij het puntstuk via de serviceweg naar de afval overlaadplaats (ik gok dat de routering zo werkt). 
Vraag: zou ik op die rijbaan niet ook sidewalk:left=separate moeten zetten, of hoeft dat niet omdat de router toch de andere rijban gebruikt omdat het éénrichting is?

Westelijke deel: dit laat ik foot=use_sidepath. Redenering: voetgangers wil je niet over de weg gerouteerd hebben en dus naar de stoep van het fietspad dwingen (use_sidepath is iets mildere vorm van 'no' toch?).
Vraag: of ga ik hier ook sidepath:right=separate plaatsen ipv use_sidepath? 
En wat doe ik dan met sidepath:left? Weglaten want éénrichtingsweg dus router gebruikt andere rijbaan, '=separate' want ligt bij andere rijbaan of '=left' (lijkt me niet correct gezien de rijbaanscheiding).

Groeten, Oscar.
eggie (2024-10-27 09:11:17+00:00): Dag Oscar..

Ik ben meer pragmatisch bezig. Het gaat anders wel ver in de microtagging.
Er wordt doorlopend iets bijverzonnen en startende mappers komen daar niet uit. Ook gezien de tijd die je er in steekt.

Verkeerd is het natuurlijk niet en laat je dus niet tegenhouden.
Een apart fietspad kun inderdaad aangeven. Denk niet dat de router er wat mee doet. Die kijkt naar no of use_sidepath.
Een voetganger kan natuurlijk overal oversteken.. Zelfs door de grasstrook heen. Ik kijk steeds of de routering het wel doet en dan is het soms schipperen.
Wanneer je als voetganger zoals bij jouw niet kan oversteken zal het aangepast 'moeten' worden.

Pas het gewoon aan zoals jij denkt dat het t beste is. 
Zolang je nog niet aan tien mappingdagen bezig bent zien ervaren mappers ze wel verschijnen in hun lijstje van Pascal Neis.
Ben nu weer bbhh. Maar nu met de nadruk op binnen.
Mapse
SerrgS (2024-10-26 01:37:31+00:00): Правки верны. Можно принять.
une abeille (2024-10-25 23:12:20+00:00): Please fix the tree the you dragged across a street, and the building that you dragged out of shape.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9810109887
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/115790303
une abeille (2024-10-25 23:13:15+00:00): Could you please put this address back where it belongs?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11972963949
AR_Mapper (2024-10-26 15:28:15+00:00): Reverted in 158381278 - Survey and Bing confirm paving stones as the majority of the surface. Not worth splitting the bottom end of the parking area into a separate way just to tag the surface
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-10-28 22:57:59+00:00): reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158477014
Josuer (2024-11-05 16:41:52+00:00): Hi, could you explain why did you reverted?
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-11-05 22:59:35+00:00): dragged node https://osmcha.org/changesets/158357895
AR_Mapper (2024-10-26 15:30:49+00:00): Reverted in 158381358. Have removed unnecessary oneway=no tags from these roads; it is not necessary to use this tag unless the road could be confused as oneway due to surrounding one-way roads. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:oneway#Normal_use
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:12:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:11:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-18 04:51:05+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165095601
5m4u9 (2024-10-26 04:15:48+00:00): Hola, gracias por corregir el nombre de la urbanización cerrada. Sabía que estaba esta urbanización cerca.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2024-10-26 11:19:32+00:00): Pour quelle raison avez-vous séparé les deux voies? Plusieurs tags de la rue (sidewalks, foot, lanes, maxspeed, etc.) ont été retirés par le fait même. Je vais réparer.
mdgm (2024-10-26 17:36:51+00:00): Salut, je les ai séparées pour utiliser le même type de chemin le long de Lapinière et simplifier donc la carte. Aussi, OsmAnd donnait des indications erronées dans cette partie. La médiane n'est absente que sur un segment assez court, et selon le wiki on peut conserver des voies séparées dans ce cas. Désolé pour les tags, merci beaucoup pour les avoir réparé!
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2024-10-26 19:20:39+00:00): Super pas de problème merci!
eggie (2024-10-26 20:23:01+00:00): Dag Flameseeker  Wanneer je hier mag fietsen dan zal het een highway=path zijn en niet een footway.
Dan is de juiste tag bicycle=yes  en niet designated.

MVG
eggie
Flameseeker (2024-10-26 21:23:57+00:00): Aha mijn OSM skills zijn nog beginner niveau. Ik heb het aangepast, volgensmij moet het zo goed zijn. Het is nu een path ipv foot path, en bicycle van designated naar yes. Dank u.
eggie (2024-10-26 21:31:48+00:00): 👍
user_22073703 (2024-10-27 15:47:55+00:00): Hey, addr:street_address and nsi_id aren't OSM tags. They shouldn't be added.
bijsgohsdacu (2024-10-27 23:58:54+00:00): Okay, thank you. I'll update the addresses and remove the nsi_id tags
GeoKitten_import (2024-10-26 02:17:23+00:00): I also used Esri Clarity imagery as a source
Brickelt963 (2026-03-19 00:08:11+00:00): Même réflexion que pour la bijouterie. Pensez à inclure le name=* Il est bien visible aussi sur la devanture.
5R-MFT (2026-03-19 09:57:55+00:00): Sometimes im not sure what is only a advertising text and what is the name because u don't speak french.
So better let put the name who knows it.

Other possibility is i just pass quickly and not time to add it because name too long and can't remember orthographic.
Brickelt963 (2026-03-19 00:03:17+00:00): Pensez bien à inclure le name=* quand vous ajoutez un commerce. Ici le commerce est Bijouterie APM Diamantines.
Brickelt963 (2026-03-19 00:05:13+00:00): Le commerce a été supprimé au profit de son doublon + récent.
seattlefyi (2024-10-26 05:52:08+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for the edit! I don't think you did anything incorrect, but looks like using the park-and-ride preset may have a side-effect which also removed the building and multistorey tags (which I think are still valid). No need to do anything, I've put them back.
seattlefyi (2024-10-26 05:56:11+00:00): BTW, do you happen to know if "park and ride" is explicitly stated on a sign there? 

The OSM wiki seems to say that signage is preferred for this tag.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:park%20ride?uselang=en

Thanks again.
seattlefyi (2024-10-26 06:05:30+00:00): Ok, I see some other edits nearby attempting to specifically add that attribute, so please disregard my previous question.
ralley (2024-10-26 03:33:41+00:00): Also Puhinui details from visit. Sources also survey and Mapillary (still uploading)
emersonveenstra (2024-10-26 12:10:05+00:00): Hi there,

So actually, the way it was before, while not perfect, matched reality more than it does now. Splitting things like off/on ramps, turn lanes, etc. need to be done as close to physical separation as possible. By putting the junction as far back as you did, you're saying that it's physically impossible to change from the off-ramp lane to the normal highway lanes, which isn't true. Would you mind changing it back to the way it was?
GPS-GR (2024-10-28 09:02:19+00:00): Hi emersonveenstra.. 
I just saw your comment. I was off-line a couple days. It appears you or someone else changed my edit back. I would have cooperated making the change back myself if I had seen it in time.

I see your point that mapping should be close to physical separation. My logic for moving the exit junction further back was because of the Solid White Line separating the Exit lane from the South Bound lanes. A Dotted White line proceeds a Solid White Line. The Dotted white line signifies a Solid White Line for an exit is approaching. And during the Dotted White Line stretch drivers are encouraged to decide their lane if they choose to Exit or not to Exit. When the Solid White Line appears, though technically possible to move Left over the Solid White Lane, it is also "discouraged" from doing that.  Likewise it is not legal to enter an exit lane bound by a solid white lane just to pass vehicles proceeding on the highway and cross left over the Solid White Line again. As for moving Right across a Solid White Line to enter the Exit Lane and remain there, that is allowed if not cutting someone off already in the Exit Lane.  

It is encouraged to be in the Exit Lane during the Dotted Line phase or as the early Solid White Line begins. That usually coincides where the Green Hwy Exit Signage directs drivers to be in the proper lane to take the Exit.

I defer to your experience as I am relatively new on OSM. However, many navigation devices rely on OSM for their base map trip plotting. It simply is frustrating when OSM based GPS App's say: "Take the Exit" just as the physical separation occurs.. and it is physically impossible to take that exit. 

A Solid White Line signifies a lane once in. to be "discouraged" from crossing. Though not physically impossible to cross but "discouraged" from doing that.

I see your point about Physical Separation. However from a Navigational accurate standpoint.. Directing a driver to the Solid White Line Exit Lane when the Solid White Line first appears is more Functionally accurate and safer from a Navigational standpoint.

Physical Separation vs Navigational Accuracy directing drivers into their Exit Lane with enough advanced notice I'm sure would make for a good discussion.  

For now I guess I'll return to just adding or editing posted speed limits. That is something I have become more familiar with over time.

Thanks again on your comment re: my exit junction edit. With every comment I learn a little more.
GPS-GR (2024-10-28 09:38:09+00:00): P.S.  I made Changeset: 158446514 [[REVERTED prior edit back to near original location for South bound I-96 / Fulton St EXIT Junction]]]].  

Please let me know if this matches what is preferred.
Junction is moved closer to the physical separation.
GPS-GR (2024-10-28 09:52:38+00:00): P.S.S.. After making Changeset 158446514 - I looked closer at my edit and adjusted it slightly to coincide with were the "V" white line is located. I believe that is where the physical lane separation begins. I hope now I have gotten it right.
emersonveenstra (2024-10-28 16:22:38+00:00): I was going to wait until you responded, but someone else changed it: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158440386

> However, many navigation devices rely on OSM for their base map trip plotting. It simply is frustrating when OSM based GPS App's say: "Take the Exit" just as the physical separation occurs.. and it is physically impossible to take that exit.

That sounds like a bug in the app you're using. Also, choosing which lane to be in prior to the exit is best done with the "turn:lanes" and "destination:lanes" tags. Having those tags will allow map routers to send users to the correct lane before it changes to a solid white line.

The corrections look good, thanks for doing that!
GPS-GR (2024-10-28 20:56:20+00:00): Hi again emersonveenstra:
Thanks for your helpful reply and suggestions. The app I use called Magic Earth Navigation seems to get turn by turn instructions ok on surface streets. Most minor surface streets don't have turn:lanes or destination:lanes assigned. It dawned on me the spoken turn instructions on Hwy's seemed to match about the same advance distance on surface streets. however traveling at hwy speed the reaction time is reduced. That could be a bug but more likely it just uses the same data point regarding road junctions  Your suggestion to use turn:lanes and "destination:lanes" does sound interesting. I'll try using that on a test hwy exit and wait for M.E. Nav app to update their app maps. Fortunately this app makes updates to their app and maps every couple of months or quarterly. Also I'll try passing this info onto their support desk. Getting a reply from them may be 50/50 or less.
I'm glad my revised edit now appears to be OK. 
Good Luck..!
GPS-GR (2024-10-28 23:05:03+00:00): P.S.  for emersonveenstra: 
At your convenience and if not too much trouble.. Can you check my discussion started at 

Changeset: 158476611

That will help keep topic and thread relevant for edit I made there.

Thanks in advance.
Nakaner-repair (2024-11-25 10:29:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted due to lack of trust in your contributions (ficitional/proposed changes uploaded in other changesets and playing around with a production database).

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159566794
Supaplex (2024-10-26 13:55:35+00:00): Hi

The OpenStreetMap project is a place to record truth and only truth, so we follow the on-the-ground rules. On the OpenStreetMap wiki, we have maintained  a list of disputed territories: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Disputed_territories

The things that do not exist in reality will be removed. 

Dự án OpenStreetMap là nơi ghi lại sự thật và chỉ sự thật, vì vậy chúng tôi tuân theo các quy tắc thực tế. Trên wiki OpenStreetMap, chúng tôi đã duy trì danh sách các vùng lãnh thổ tranh chấp: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Disputed_territories

Những thứ không tồn tại trong thực tế sẽ bị xóa.

Data Working Group
data@osmfoundation.org

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158377529
dval (2024-10-26 06:19:34+00:00): Чтобы изменить форму чего-либо не обязательно удалять мп. Достаточно просто отредактировать каждую линию до нужной кондиции.
agent-98 (2024-10-26 06:22:13+00:00): Дело в том, что границы площади и трибун не совпадают в реальности
dval (2024-10-26 06:48:47+00:00): Возможно вы стараетесь успеть до определенного срока и в таких условиях, понятное дело, сделать побыстрее привычным способом бывает более предпочтительно. Это понятно, к тому же правильно и так, и так. Только одно замечание: вы трибуны включили в площадь пешеходной зоны, а я бы сделал их МЕЖДУ газонами и пешеходкой, поскольку они есть отдельные объекты, а не части другого, как понимаю.
vasony (2024-10-28 19:40:20+00:00): Hello, you have deleted three nodes with address and not created "a new buildings" as stated in the changeset comment.
Can you clarify the situation?

Thx, Tamas
silversurfer83 (2024-10-26 08:01:58+00:00): Moin :)

die "Bäckerei" beim Campingplatz Brüssow, die du hier hinzugefügt hast, hat einen ungewöhnlichen Namen. Sicher, dass sie einfach "Bäckerei" heißt?

Ich Frage deshalb: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen

cheers
silversurfer83
MiEc09 (2024-10-26 10:37:25+00:00): Die bäckerei heist tatsächlich "Bäckerei Grünewald" (vom Netto) habe mich da irgendwie vertan
hfs (2025-02-10 07:38:20+00:00): Hi MiEc09,

ich muss jetzt auch nochmal wegen des Netto fragen, den Du hier hinzugefügt hast: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12289503801

Ich glaube Du meintest diesen hier ein paar Meter weiter: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1319872040.

Laut Website https://www.kreta-brüssow.de/ soll sich in diesem Gebäude stattdessen das griechische Restaurant „Kreta“ befinden.
MiEc09 (2025-02-15 09:17:02+00:00): Ich habe noch mal auf maps nachgeguckt und es stimmt.
Leider weiss maps auch nicht wo der netto ist (der angezeigte punkt ist zwischen zwei häusern) und Prenzlauer Str. 19a ist auch nicht dort.
Um die verwirrung zu verringern (und weil ich wahrscheinlich falsch liege) würde ich erst einmal den Netto und die Bäckerei entfernen.
hfs (2025-02-21 07:14:56+00:00): Danke MiEc09 für Deine Antwort.

In der Zwischenzeit wurden der Netto und der Bäcker von jemand anderem gelöscht:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162755550

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162755569

Damit hat es sich glaube ich erledigt.

Beste Grüße
hfs