piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2025-11-24 04:51:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 21 potential crossings.

Problematic elements (top 3 by category):
https://osm.org/way/729505213 v1 | crossings=4
https://osm.org/way/549672782 v2 | crossings=4
https://osm.org/way/1081106465 v2 | crossings=3

Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/3317869897 v4
https://osm.org/node/9909151182 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=175050739
Fizzie-DWG (2025-12-24 06:29:10+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised Editing & import

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176338702
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-06-08 10:47:35+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19876278

jaki sens ma ta jednoelementowa relacja?
Damasz (2026-06-11 09:57:59+00:00): Coś tu rzeczywiście namieszałem. Nie wiem, jak poprawnie dodać linie autobusowe.
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-23 08:21:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 184464646 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions from user Gaurab5034, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20856
TheBestIdea (2026-04-21 15:17:57+00:00): The crosswalk at way 1453261393 was removed in the summer of 2025. I'm changing it to demolished:highway=footway so it doesn't get re-added. The new correct crosswalk is way 1115141958. See https://roadview.planninglabs.nyc/view/-73.8944761/40.8854020
NeisBot (2025-11-24 06:24:43+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Telecom site marketing company"
NeisBot (2025-11-24 06:24:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description
11900chris (2025-11-27 21:14:54+00:00): Hello, this has been a designated multi-use path for the past 11+ years. I have reverted the changes. Please refer to the following streetview imagery:
https://www.google.ca/maps/@48.4569779,-123.5171933,3a,75y,207.12h,80.73t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1soQ_vH4dPBQUxJ6ZxLqFs7g!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fcb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26pitch%3D9.270750333302175%26panoid%3DoQ_vH4dPBQUxJ6ZxLqFs7g%26yaw%3D207.12257497331007!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI1MTEyMy4xIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D
neurotik (2025-11-28 01:47:10+00:00): So it is, thank you! TIL.
AndyB_66 (2025-11-25 15:04:23+00:00): Znacznik "opening_date" wstawiamy wówczas, gdy droga jest faktycznie oddana do ruchu - usuń go, proszę.
AndyB_66 (2025-11-25 19:52:13+00:00): Ups, pomyliłem ze "start_date" - jest OK.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-12-26 05:30:46+00:00): DWG revert - duplicated roads

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176419566
Fizzie-DWG (2025-11-26 03:21:09+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19024
NeisBot (2025-11-24 07:02:35+00:00): Hi crazymacattacks, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 83% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 1 highway(s)
- 5 building(s)
- 2 natural(s)
- 3 landuse(')

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=175053104
crazymacattacks (2025-11-24 07:07:43+00:00): This was intentional.
maro21 (2025-11-24 22:50:41+00:00): Czy mógłbyś podawać opisy zmian?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian

Czy mógłbyś robić lokalne zestawy zmian?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Zestaw_zmian#Geograficzny_rozmiar_zestaw%C3%B3w_zmian
NeisBot (2025-11-24 07:30:42+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Security systems company in Calgary Alberta"
NeisBot (2025-11-24 07:30:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
hlfan (2025-11-24 14:45:08+00:00): Über der U4 in Margareten liegen aber keine Pflastersteine, oder?
coatix (2025-11-24 15:17:50+00:00): Alle Gehwege im neuen Naschmarkt sehen so aus:
https://streetcomplete.app/p/317778.jpg
Was ich ausgewählt hab in SC sah dem am ähnlichsten
coatix (2025-11-24 15:18:58+00:00): *Naschpark
mcliquid (2025-11-25 14:36:18+00:00): Werte größtenteils falsch...
Fabian007 (2025-12-06 12:05:24+00:00): Hallo Mcliquid,

Vielen Dank für deine Antwort und sorry, das ich erst zu spät zurückmelde!!

Oh das wusste ich nicht. Wie kann ich das wieder Rückgang machen, oder kannst du das bitte für mich erledigen, bitte??

Danke, und sorry, das die Werte falsch eingetragen habe!!

Ich wünsche dir einen schönen Samstag Mittag noch!!

Mit Freundlichen Grüßen Fabian007
mcliquid (2025-11-25 14:34:22+00:00): Den linksseitigen Radweg hast du komplett unterschlagen.
Fabian007 (2025-12-06 12:17:22+00:00): Hallo Mcliquid,

Vielen Dank für deine Nachricht, und sorry, das die Radwege komplett unterschlagen habe!!

Und wie kann ich das wieder Rückgängig machen, oder kannst das auch bitte Rückgängig machen??

Danke, fürs bescheid geben und auch Entschuldigung, das ich zu spät zurückgeschrieben habe!!

Ich wünsche dir einen schönen Samstag Mittag noch!!

Mit Freundlichen Grüßen Fabian007
mcliquid (2025-11-25 14:33:14+00:00): Keine der Haltestellen hat taktiles Pflaster!
Deinstalliere die App bitte, das ist hier nicht hilfreich.
Fabian007 (2025-12-06 12:33:12+00:00): Hallo mcliquid,

Vielen Dank für deine Nachricht, und Sorry, das ich auch hier falsch eingetragen habe!!

Ich wusste leider nicht, das da leider keine taktiles Pflaster hat.

Und wie kann ich das wieder Rückgängig machen oder machst du bitte diese Änderung wieder Rückgängig, bitte??

Ich habe diese App vor paar Tagen von meinen Handy wieder deinstalliert, und werde es in Zukunft nicht mehr nochmal wieder herunterladen, sodass es zu keine Fehler bei mir entstehen kann.

Aber danke nochmal für deine Info und Sorry, das ich erst zu spät zurückgemeldet habe!!

Ich wünsche dir einen schönen Samstag Mittag noch!!

Mit Freundlichen Grüßen Fabian007
mcliquid (2025-11-25 14:37:31+00:00): Die Haltestellen sind nicht beleuchtet. Warum erzeugst du überall falsche Daten?
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=763042430101561&focus=photo
Fabian007 (2025-12-03 20:56:06+00:00): Hallo mcliquid,

Entschuldige, da habe ich leider auch falsch eingetragen.

Ich wusste leider nicht das da nicht beleuchtet wird!!

Aber wie schon gesagt die StreetComplete App habe ich vor paar Tagen von meinen Handy wieder deinstalliert, sodass auch diese Fehler nicht michmall passieren kann.

Aber, bevor ich nochmall da was falsches machen kann, könntest mir bitte dabei hefen, diesen Fehler bitte wieder rückgängig zu machen, sodass es wieder stimmen wird??

Vielen Dank in voraus, das du auch diese Änderung Rückgängig machst!!

Ich wünsche dir einen schönen Mittwoch Abend dir noch!!

Mit Freundlichen Grüßen Fabian007
Fabian007 (2025-12-03 20:57:07+00:00): Hallo mcliquid,

Entschuldige, da habe ich leider auch falsch eingetragen.

Ich wusste leider nicht das da nicht beleuchtet wird!!

Aber wie schon gesagt die StreetComplete App habe ich vor paar Tagen von meinen Handy wieder deinstalliert, sodass auch diese Fehler nicht mochmall passieren kann.

Aber, bevor ich nochmall da was falsches machen kann, könntest mir bitte dabei hefen, diesen Fehler bitte wieder rückgängig zu machen, sodass es wieder stimmen wird??

Vielen Dank in voraus, das du auch diese Änderung Rückgängig machst!!

Ich wünsche dir einen schönen Mittwoch Abend dir noch!!

Mit Freundlichen Grüßen Fabian007
Fabian007 (2025-12-03 20:57:50+00:00): Hallo mcliquid,

Entschuldige, da habe ich leider auch falsch eingetragen.

Ich wusste leider nicht das da nicht beleuchtet wird!!

Aber wie schon gesagt die StreetComplete App habe ich vor paar Tagen von meinen Handy wieder deinstalliert, sodass auch diese Fehler nicht mochmall passieren wirt.

Aber, bevor ich nochmall da was falsches machen kann, könntest mir bitte dabei hefen, diesen Fehler bitte wieder rückgängig zu machen, sodass es wieder stimmen wird??

Vielen Dank in voraus, das du auch diese Änderung Rückgängig machst!!

Ich wünsche dir einen schönen Mittwoch Abend dir noch!!

Mit Freundlichen Grüßen Fabian007
mcliquid (2025-12-03 20:59:18+00:00): Es reicht ein Kommentar. Die Fehler sind behoben.
Fabian007 (2025-12-03 21:05:09+00:00): Hallo Metzor,

Vielen Dank für deine Nachricht und Sorry, das ich zu viele Kommentare hintergelassen habe!!

Danke, das du diese Fehler Rückganig gemacht hast!!

Ich werde die anderen Tagen noch meine nicht beantworteten Änderungen durch gehen, und es an dir jedoch schreiben, wenn es für dich in Ordnung wäre??

Ich wünsche dir einen schönen Mittwoch Abend noch!!

Mit Freundlichen Grüßen Fabian007
mcliquid (2025-11-25 14:29:20+00:00): Hier gibt es keine Insel!
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=4213479182220856&focus=photo
Fabian007 (2025-12-06 12:52:25+00:00): Hallo mcliquid,

Vielen Dank für deine Nachricht und sorry das ich zu spät zurückmelde und das ich hier den Insel eingetragen habe!!

Wie kann ich diesen Fehler wieder Rückgängig machen, oder könntest du es bitte machen??

Aber danke für deine Info!!

Ich wünsche dir einen schönen Samstag Mittag noch!!

Mit Freundlichen Grüßen Fabian007
mcliquid (2025-11-25 14:29:50+00:00): Hier gibt es kein taktiles Pflaster!
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=4213479182220856&focus=photo

Bitte stoppe deine Bearbeitungen und lösche die App wieder! Vielen Dank.
Fabian007 (2025-12-06 12:46:22+00:00): Hallo mcliquid, 

Sorry, das ich erst zu spät zurückmelde!!

Auch sorry, das wusste ich auch hier leider nicht, das hier kein taktiles Pflaster gibt!!

Und wie kann ich auch hier wieder Rückgängig machen oder könntest du bitte diese Änderung wieder Rückgängig machen, bitte??

Ich habe, wie grad vorhin schon geschrieben, das ich diese App vor paar Tagen wieder von meinen Handy deinsterliert habe und werde es nicht mehr herunterladen, bevor es wieder zu solchen Fehlen wieder kommen würde.

Aber danke, für die Info von dir!!

Ich wünsche dir einen schönen Samstag Mittag noch!!

Mit Freundlichen Grüßen Fabian007
mcliquid (2025-11-25 14:28:29+00:00): Der Übergang ist doch nicht hoch. Wie kommst du darauf? https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=4213479182220856&focus=photo

Deine Mühen in allen Ehren, aber bitte hör wieder auf, mit der App zu arbeiten. Das scheint nichts für dich zu sein. Vielen Dank für dein Verständnis.
Fabian007 (2025-12-06 13:03:49+00:00): Hallo mcliquid,

Vielen Dank, für deine Nachricht und sorry, das ich auch hier falsch eingetragen habe und das ich erst zu spät bei dir zurückmelde!!

Wie kann ich diese Änderung wieder Rückgängig machen, oder machst du bitte diese Änderung wieder Rückgängig??

Ich habe vor paar Tagen die App von meinen Handy wieder deinsterliert und werde die App nicht nochmal wieder herunterladen, sodass es keine Fehler mehr entstehen kann.

Aber danke für die Info von dir!!

Ich wünsche dir einen schönen Samstag Mittag noch!!

Mit Freundlichen Grüßen Fabian007
mcliquid (2025-11-25 10:37:49+00:00): Auch hier: Das ist falsch!
Fabian007 (2025-12-06 13:07:51+00:00): Hallo mcliquid,

Vielen Dank, für deine Nachricht und sorry, das ich auch hier falsch eingetragen habe und das ich erst zu spät bei dir zurückmelde!!

Wie kann ich diese Änderung wieder Rückgängig machen, oder machst du bitte diese Änderung wieder Rückgängig??

Aber danke für die Info von dir!!

Ich wünsche dir einen schönen Samstag Mittag noch!!

Mit Freundlichen Grüßen Fabian007
citrula (2025-11-24 19:48:32+00:00): Welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contributions. You can press "Q" to square the corners of buildings
nevw (2025-11-26 13:54:11+00:00): Hi, a work in progress I guess
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=124.21806&lat=-9.31979&zoom=10
Laveure (2025-11-27 09:39:06+00:00): Is there any secondary sources for this, or are these simply claims by Indonesia?
Laveure (2025-11-27 09:45:56+00:00): It is quite concerning that FajrAl, an Indonesian user, has altered the borders using only Indonesian sources. Relying on such material which may reflect an irredentist view is a serious issue.

These edits have already produced strange and inaccurate boundary lines between Singapore, Malaysia and Indonesia, which do not match any recognised treaties or established baselines.
FajrAl (2025-11-27 10:46:20+00:00): Hi @nevw, I didn't realize some part went missing. I will fix it soon. Thank you commenting.
FajrAl (2025-11-27 10:51:05+00:00): @Laveure it's a treaty between Indonesia and Singapore https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/se-asia/singapore-indonesia-submit-final-sea-border-treaty-to-un-as-they-celebrate-50th
https://treaties.un.org/Pages/showDetails.aspx?objid=08000002804cce54

In this case, I also fix some neighboring country. You can access it here.
https://indonesia.go.id/peta-indonesia/22
peanuthole (2026-02-27 22:06:54+00:00): This changeset also puts South Ledge inside of Singaporean territory, contrary to the ICJ's ruling in 2008. https://web.archive.org/web/20091123011539/http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/130/14490.pdf I'm undoing it.
FajrAl (2026-02-27 23:25:20+00:00): @peanuthole

I apologize for the confusion regarding South Ledge being included within the Singapore relation boundaries. In earlier renderings (for example on OpenTopoMap), it appears to fall within Malaysia; however, those maps may be based on older or differing boundary datasets.

Per the 2008 ICJ Judgment, the Court ruled that sovereignty over South Ledge belongs to the State in whose territorial waters it is located. However, the maritime boundary (delimitation) between Malaysia and Singapore in this specific area has not yet been formally finalized or publicly published in Singapore’s OneMap or Malaysia’s JUPEM data. As such, the precise boundary in this location remains effectively a gray area from a legal and cartographic perspective.

The most recent publicly available maritime boundary update I could find relates to Indonesia (2017, with a newer 2025 version). Malaysia appears to still reference its 1979 map, while Singapore does not publish extended maritime boundary lines beyond the mainland in its open data portal.

Given these differences in available sources, I am open to further clarification or references to any more up-to-date or officially published boundary data.
peanuthole (2026-02-28 09:02:10+00:00): Very fair point. I ended up not deleting the boundary as I realised it is an enclave within Indonesia's waters and not within Malaysia's
Fizzie-DWG (2025-12-24 06:29:11+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised Editing & import

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176338702
NeisBot (2025-11-24 08:19:35+00:00): Hi salee3, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 97% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 1 highway(s)
- 1 building(s)
- 1 landuse(')

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=175055188
woodpeck (2025-11-24 08:37:55+00:00): reverted, user block in https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18998
Fizzie-DWG (2025-12-24 06:29:12+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised Editing & import

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176338702
NeisBot (2025-11-24 08:42:39+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 19 potential crossings.

Problematic elements (top 3 by category):
https://osm.org/way/1383007883 v2 | crossings=10
https://osm.org/way/107701812 v12 | crossings=9

Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/3573420574 v3

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=175055885
user_5359 (2025-11-24 19:01:11+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/3573420574 more than 100 meters over streets and buildings. 
I moved the node back to the original position.
By the way: There is a difference between a park (leisure=park) and a parking place (amenity=parking).
Jacksonville (2025-11-29 22:41:37+00:00): Instead of being stubborn can you give an example of where the classification of highways have changed because of borders have been closed? The Russ-Ukranian highway classifications haven't changed, neither any border highways in Afghanistan, or Iran-Turkey border highways.
Jacksonville (2025-11-29 22:42:13+00:00): Did the classification of highways change during COVID when all the borders around the world were closed?
RLakhani (2025-11-29 22:47:33+00:00): You know this is not the same issue. You’re talking about pandemic which came to an end, and an ongoing war between two countries. This road has been closed since 1965, and for 60 years there’s no serious talk of even reopening it. There’s no longer functions as a primary road.
RLakhani (2025-11-29 22:48:56+00:00): And if you’re kindly notice, the classification system on OSM for roads is based on function. Barki Road doesn’t connect towns anymore. It connects Lahore to a small Pakistani town near the border, and then onto a military area with no possibility of crossing over into India and onto Indian towns.
RLakhani (2025-11-29 22:51:07+00:00): And yes, look at the border between Armenia and Turkey
Jacksonville (2025-11-30 00:34:01+00:00): Which highway are you referring to between Armenia and Turkey?

And it does not matter if the border is closed. It is still the same highway that continues to link it to the physical border, and by extension the Indian town across the border. That makes it a primary road.

I've given you several examples of highways that link to closed borders, yet you aren't even willing to consider the other opinion.

You've restricted access to parts of the road that are like 300-400 meters away from border/military complex (not even the zero line), which is something that you've done previously for most of the border highways.
Jacksonville (2025-11-30 20:34:09+00:00): I'm awaiting your reply.
RLakhani (2025-12-01 01:05:01+00:00): You cannot ignore the fact that the road does NOT connect to an Indian town, because you cannot cross the border.  If you cannot cross the border, then the road does NOT connect to a town across the border. I don't know how that is so controversial? This road has been closed fo 60 years at this point. This isnt a temporary closure like COVID or recently closed like Ukraine-Russia. Neither country is talking about opening it up again. 

As for the restricting access several hundred metres from the border - sure I might have just selected a chunk of road and didnt cut it into a smaller section to restrict. You can change that part without protest from me. 

You can look at the Armenia-Turkey border yourself, but just a few examples:

1) D 060 to Akhurik-Gyumri Highway M-7 after

2) Araks-Hushakert Highway stops being a primary road close to the closed border even though an old bridge physically exists to connect to Turkey. 

3) Also the R63 in Azerbaijan at the town of Heydarabad doesnt continue on as a high-priority road into Armenia because it doesnt serve as a border crossing since the 1994 war.

4) the Горийское шоссе - გორი-ცხინვალი-გუფთა-ჯავა-როკი on the Georgia-Russia border also drops in classification across the closed border

5) also the Didi Gromi - Mejvriskhevi border road

6) there are several examples on the Moldova-Ukraine border
RLakhani (2025-12-01 01:07:19+00:00): Also look on the Indian side of the border - there isnt a road up to the border anymore. Their road ends at what looks like a military base/border post. Seen most clearly on "Mapbox Satellite"
Jacksonville (2025-12-02 00:04:47+00:00): The road DOES connect. You purposefully deleted the node that linked the two roads connected, otherwise it's perfectly visible from satellite footage that the road are linked. Again, you're making these arbitary decisions without having any sort of decisions. Barki Road is indeed linked to the Indian highway across the border.

The only instance where this logic applies is the Khem Karan road where there used to be road, but the road has been diverted towards some other village and the road falls short of the military posts on both sides. Your logic, again, doesn't apply at Barki road.

> D 060 to Akhurik-Gyumri Highway M-7 after

Bruh, how is that even comparable here? The U-7 or M-7 isn't even directly linked to D 060 on the Turkish side. The Barki Road is directly connected to NH703B highway here. It's literally visible from the satellite. Barki Road is an artery of the Lahore city, that connects it to the Indian border.

> Also the R63 in Azerbaijan at the town of Heydarabad

Again, not comparable. The highways are, once again, not directly linked, and the roads aren't any important arteries of any city, like Barki Road, and the NH703B. The road literally ceases to exist at Way #1360179049 - this is plainly visble from the Sky.

Same with the rest of your examples. What I find amusing is that you've attempted to use the Armenia-Turkey Border situation, ie. they are all closed. Yet all the major highways still retain their classification like:

1. Way #120580504 M-3 to D977 is the perfect example - a primary road connecting into a GT road, both retaining their classification, despite the borders remaining closed.

2. Did any of the highways connecting into Russia or Ukraine have their classification changed?

3. What about Egypt-Gaza border highway or Gaza-Israel, which has been destroyed?
Jacksonville (2025-12-02 00:08:20+00:00): FWIW, Google Maps has also labelled it as a major highway right till the zero line.
Jacksonville (2025-12-02 00:10:28+00:00): See this map of the Lahore district which has also labelled Barki Road as a "main road" right till border.

https://eproperty.pk/map/lahore/lahore-district-map.html
Jacksonville (2025-12-02 00:16:07+00:00): Same with:
1. https://reliefweb.int/map/pakistan/pakistan-lahore-district-reference-map-september-2014
2. https://lcci.pk/core/uploads/2019/05/map.pdf

As well as the official surveys of Pakistan:

1. https://surveyofpakistan.gov.pk/SiteImage/Downloads/road_map_punjab.pdf
2. https://surveyofpakistan.gov.pk/SiteImage/Downloads/province_map_punjab.pdf
Jacksonville (2025-12-03 20:59:38+00:00): The point I'm trying to make is that, in every situation - this has been labelled as a main highway.

For you to try and convince other people that it isn't, is merely an abitary choice that you're making, same with the Guru Nanak Highway, and all the other classification of highways you've changed.
Jacksonville (2025-12-06 22:59:52+00:00): I take it from your lack of response that you have no further objections?