piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Lumikeiju (2025-08-02 19:44:33+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

It seems like this changeset includes moving some artwork in Seattle away from its actual location, even though the majority of your edits are in a completely different area.

This is a pretty easy error to make - while navigating around the map, sometimes things get accidentally moved. That's ok - we all make mistakes, especially when starting out!

I have fixed the location in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169875001

Happy mapping!
silversurfer83 (2025-08-02 20:55:14+00:00): Hi everyone, especially Ayhai Kalo,

the moved artwork isn't the only problem: There's a house named "AyhaiKalo’s House
" which also has some weird looking adress.
Could you please explain that?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169875001
silversurfer83 (2025-08-02 21:00:47+00:00): There's more, I'm afraid:
please make sure to connect the ends of highways to adjacent highways if there is a real world connection.

And while on the topic of highways: one of your new ways crosses a building. Please take more care to map things better.

In case of questions, please reach out

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169875001
jeslop (2025-08-04 10:44:44+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169947499
texent (2025-08-02 18:29:29+00:00): 追記:中石津団地と石津川第2水防倉庫を追加
texent (2025-08-02 18:36:54+00:00): のぶき公園付近階段追加,連立工事ヤードエリア修正,浜寺公園駅前広場名称付記
Makeena (2025-08-02 18:40:43+00:00): Sorry for the many incomplete ways. Vespucci is having a fail and i cant do a selective upload right now. Im going to complete the ways soon, please dont delete.
Makeena (2025-08-02 18:52:43+00:00): And also sorry for the weirdly deformed tracks, apparently something with the upload went wrong, working on it
letsridebikes (2025-08-02 18:34:16+00:00): Source should be survey, not local knowledge
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-03-27 10:11:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 180494113 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some poor quality and some fantasy mapping in Ukraine
Taya_S (2025-08-02 18:42:22+00:00): Reverted Berlin name vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169876075
anastasia_ (2025-08-12 23:59:29+00:00): Здравствуйте! Можете, пожалуйста, рассказать, где можно изучить про эту деревню?
На ПКК/ФИАСе данных нет
jeslop (2025-08-04 10:44:45+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169947499
yelisey90 (2025-08-02 20:07:27+00:00): Was relocating https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1195252791 intentional or not?
LevanGo (2025-08-02 20:16:26+00:00): No I didn't intend to do so
yelisey90 (2025-08-02 21:56:34+00:00): Then you can use, for example, https://revert.monicz.dev/ to revert a part of the changeset. The filter should be like this: node(id:1195252791)
archie (2025-08-02 19:35:55+00:00): Hej Marcus,

Du har i denna cs - och jag vill minnas att jag sett tidigare av dig - infört rätt ordentliga imagery offset på del objekt som tidigare varit rätt placerade samt på de som du ritat in. 
Du måste justera din bildbakgrund, speciellt Bing. Den ligger inte rätt per default. 
Vänligen läs det här: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Vertical_Aerial_Photographs#Sources_already_in_use

De offset som du har infört är rätt betydande, så vänligen flytta inte på saker innan du behärskar det här. Du förstör annars vad andra har ritat in. Speciellt i det här området har mycket av vägar importerats med rätt läge.
Marcus Johansson1 (2025-08-02 20:33:28+00:00): Hej!

Hittar ingen information hur jag ställer in bilderna.
jeslop (2025-08-04 10:44:46+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169947499
jeslop (2025-08-04 11:17:10+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169949334
jeslop (2025-08-04 11:17:11+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169949334
Martin Borsje (2025-12-13 17:23:57+00:00): Hoi, waarom heb je de Caumerbeek omgedoopt tot Nieuwe Caumerbeek? Het Waterschap Limburg, de officiële bron, noemt nog steeds de Caumerbeek.
Martin Borsje (2025-12-14 05:49:40+00:00): Ik zie dat benedenstrooms volgens het waterschap de beek inderdaad Nieuwe C.beek heeft . Negeer mijn opmerking hiervoor.
jeslop (2025-08-04 11:17:12+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169949334
jeslop (2025-08-04 11:20:56+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169949527
vmicho (2025-09-25 19:11:43+00:00): Hello?
Since when "Adding" means deleting?
Tommybara (2025-09-26 00:29:29+00:00): Thanks for asking. If you take a closer look you will see that the nodes I deleted are those with no tags at all, and were added by accident by another user.
vmicho (2025-09-26 06:05:46+00:00): What about this one?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13042624169

Also description of the changeset is crap.
aceman444 (2025-08-02 22:18:20+00:00): Tie chodniky opri kolajach vovnutri zabradlia ako https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1419438589 naozaj existuju? Su urcene aby tam chodili chodci (ked uz maju chodnik za zabradlim)? A nie su na nic napojene, takze navigovat tam aj tak nebude.
vlakos555 (2025-08-03 16:44:21+00:00): myslim si že chodniky vedla kolajnic, medzi zabradliami kolajnic, by vobec nemali byt. Celý priestor medzi zabradlim je "koľajisko". Tam sa nemá kto čo motať ! Neviem či také niečo existuje v OSM.
aceman444 (2025-08-03 19:14:15+00:00): Ano, presne preto sa pytam, preco ste prave tie pridali. Treba ich dat prec a pridat to jedno zabradlie za chodnikom smerom k Jantarovej.
vlakos555 (2025-08-03 19:36:11+00:00): Tak nakoniec tie chodníky v koľajisku som urobil ja ??? Ak áno, tak to je hrubý omyl. Sorry. Potom ich ja samozrejme aj vymažem. Zábradlie od  Jasovskej som už doplnil. Len prosím skontrolovať tie prepojenia ciest v tej križovatke.
vlakos555 (2025-08-03 19:50:45+00:00): 2 chodníky teraz odstránené. Ten priestor koľajiska by sa mohol nejako otagovať ako "koľajisko", resp. priestor so zákazom vstupu. Dá sa to ?
vlakos555 (2025-08-04 05:16:26+00:00): Tak teším sa, že už je to dobre. Stále tade nenaviguje chodca k zastávke, ale to je asi len otázka času- kým si to preberie navigácia.
PS: rozmýšľal som nad tým, prečo tie 2 chodníky som tam pridal. Zrejme len nejakým nedopatrením. Niečo som skúšal a OMYLOM SA MI TO ODOSLALO. Svedčí o tom to, že v popise changesetu je "snaž". Ja sa vždy snažím zadávať popis výstižne. Sorry, stalo sa...
vlakos555 (2025-08-04 11:50:26+00:00): ... a už som si spomenul, čo som vtedy skúšal keď som vyrobil chybu. PREPOJENIE CIEST (chodníkov). Aby tade navigovalo chodca, čo aj teraz ešte NEIDE. Skúšal som to tak, že keď danú cestu (ako budúcu trasu) posuniem, má sa posúvať celá. Neviem či to tak má byť, to bol môj výmysel. Dá sa to aj ináč overiť ? Rád sa poučím. Pozri to prípadne Ty, pls. a odpíš či je tam nastavenie OK. Vďaka.
aceman444 (2025-08-06 17:28:27+00:00): "Kolajisko" by sa dalo zaznacit ako landuse=railway (pouziva sa na priestor okolo zeleznice), dokonca je tam v realite znacka "zakaz vjazdu", asi aby tam nejake auto nahodou nezabocilo, kedze je tam prekny hladky beton. Ale ako cestu (s vehicle=private) to asi znacit nechceme, jedine, ze by tadial jazdili vozidla dopravneho podniku k tym budovam dalej v obraticku. Skuste odpozorovat.

Bohuzial na tie pokusy s navigaciou neviem odpovedat, nerozumiem co sa pytate.
aceman444 (2025-08-06 17:31:17+00:00): Navigacia OSRM tam uz naviguje: https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_foot&route=48.09638%2C17.1093%3B48.093986%2C17.109457#map=18/48.095186/17.109420&layers=N . Ine bud este nemaju zaktualizovane data, alebo nevedia, ze chodec moze ist po ceste railway=platform (zeleznicne nastupiste). S tym vela nenarobime.
vlakos555 (2025-08-06 17:38:33+00:00): Dobre. Pôjdem zistiť či vozidlá DP tam majú nejakú inú možnosť prístupu.
Čo sa týka navigácie pre chodca, ako som písal, funguje už v OsmAnde aj v OSM. Tým to považujem za vyriešené.  Ostatné navigácie nebudem riešiť.
vlakos555 (2025-08-07 18:22:46+00:00): Bol som na mieste pozrieť ako sa vozidlá a stavebné stroje dostanú dozadu k depu. Zistené, že z Jantárovej vedie dozadu prašná štrková cesta. Aj som odpozoroval že tade jazdia. Cesta v OSM nebola, dokreslil som ju. Tagy je možné vylepšiť. Dal som čo som vedel.
gmar5 (2025-08-02 21:25:08+00:00): I think they should be tagged as removed:* and disused:*. 
Bus stops are quite prominent in the rendered map, so keeping them as normal seems a bit misleading, if they are gone.
Andrew Chadwick (2025-08-02 21:49:59+00:00): Makes sense. I'm not fond of physically_present=no by itself.

The two stops vary in terms of gone-ness, and I was fighting a bit with StreetComplete and Vespucci at the time. I'll update as needed.

Hoping Relatify and https://osm-naptan.andrewtrevena.co.uk/bus-stops/south-east/oxfordshire (when it's working) understand proper OSM lifecycle tags.
jeslop (2025-08-04 11:20:57+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169949527
superjeck (2025-08-05 22:22:03+00:00): This edit violates OSM rules. The name tag must use the local language name, even for features in international waters. English names belong in name:en, not in name.
Moldovan_Merkator (2025-08-06 12:35:23+00:00): Dude, do you see where is located this object? Its located in international waters, that mean there are no "local language names", thus it should be named in a lingua franca, that is English.
jeslop (2025-08-13 10:25:15+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170381618
jeslop (2025-08-13 10:24:52+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170381602
jeslop (2025-08-13 10:24:21+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170381580
jeslop (2025-08-13 10:23:11+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170381523
totera (2025-08-03 12:24:24+00:00): Ciao napo, non so perché iD ritiene che per le linee di autobus abbia qualche utilità che il tag network sia un doppione di operator, quando invece è un'informazione fondamentale distinguere tra reti urbane ed extraurbane della stessa azienda, vista la diversa validità di biglietti, abbonamenti ecc.
Ho ripristinato quindi i precedenti valori di network.
ivanbranco (2025-08-03 12:42:37+00:00): Per essere precisi non è proprio iD ma NSI: https://nsi.guide/index.html?t=transit&k=route&v=bus&tt=start%20plus

Se questi valori sono errati bisognerebbe aprire una issue nel loro GitHub per correggerli/eliminarli. Io non me ne intendo.
napo (2025-08-03 13:54:17+00:00): Grazie
ID Editor ha fatto tutto da se
La zona fra Ascoli Piceno e Teramo ha bisogno di tanto amore: mancano tantissimi edifici
b-jazz (2025-08-03 14:45:14+00:00): RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1419444981

When drawing golf course areas (i.e. greens, fairways, bunkers, tees, etc.), please be aware that the ways (lines) used to outline those areas can't cross over each other. Fairway outlines shouldn't cross over greens or bunkers or other fairways for example. Take a look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Golf.png for an example of the "Wrong" way to map a fairway and a green. There are some cases where a fringe exists around a green and you should draw the fairway outline completely around a green. Other times, the fairway and green butt up against each other. In that case the fairway and green should share the same nodes at the boundary between the two. When drawing these shared nodes, editors like iD will "snap" to an existing node if you get close enough. If you could go back and clean up where you've made this mistake, that would be great. But more importantly, if you could stop from doing this in the future, it would be greatly appreciated. If you have any questions about golf course mapping, feel free to reach out. Thanks.
jeslop (2025-08-13 10:22:15+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170381498
jeslop (2025-08-13 10:21:50+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170381480
jeslop (2025-08-13 10:21:10+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170381438
GinaroZ (2025-08-04 14:37:42+00:00): has the Woodside reopened?
ExoMal (2025-08-04 14:46:21+00:00): Spotted the Woodside while I was cycling by, didn't realize it was actually closed down, thanks for letting me know. I've kept the name tag (it's visually prominent) and added disused:tourism=hotel to stop it showing up as a hotel.
AndreaDp271 (2025-08-03 10:29:27+00:00): Occhio, hai eliminato un nodo per ricrearlo in maniera errata, escludendolo dalla relazione. Ho già sistemato io ripristinando tutto. Sentiamoci per capire meglio come funzionano le relazioni dei bus
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169880247
infeeeee (2025-08-05 12:09:04+00:00): Hello!

You added some new localities, with Slovak only names. 

E.g.: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13043632698
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13043632697
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13043632691

What are these? What is your source on them?

If you want to add Slovak translations to existing features, try to find the feature, and add the name there. Do not create non-existent localities please.
gymate (2025-09-16 12:55:57+00:00): I've reverted them: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172013870
EvanSiroky (2025-08-28 19:29:41+00:00): It looks like some cycle lanes are added as separate ways, but they aren't necessarily separated from the rest of the roadway. Also some of the roads are already tagged with cycleway=lane. I think some of these ways should probably removed according to how things are described in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway.
Snusmumriken (2025-08-03 04:22:47+00:00): Hi
 
As there are very few places that accepts cash in Stockholm, I'm wondering what is the source of the change you made?
CurlingMan13 (2025-11-02 22:35:08+00:00): don't use descriptive names.
eggie (2025-08-03 17:33:28+00:00): Dag  Peripinkel

Je vraagt feedback  Een trap zal toch niet routeren voor iets op wielen. .. behalve als je aangeeft dat er een gootje voor fietsers is aangebracht. 
vehicle=no hoef je iet toe te voegen.
access=yes is default.. Dat hoeft niet getagd te worden.
MVG
eggie
Peripinkel (2025-08-03 18:48:50+00:00): Super bedankt voor de feedback eggie!

De access=yes was toegevoegd voor mij en er was een error indicatie vanuit osmose issues (denk ik, zou ook keepright kunnen zijn). Ik dacht door die error dat er nog gespecificeerd moest worden wat er wel en niet doorheen kon.

Het klinkt logisch, bedankt.
Met vriendelijke groet,
Peri
lotug (2025-08-03 08:13:30+00:00): Hi! What's the reason for reverting my previous edits? Were they not correct?
I followed the wiki article on buses. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Buses
archie (2025-08-03 08:17:25+00:00): Duplicats
lotug (2025-08-03 08:24:10+00:00): Right, in Kalmar there were some duplicates as I was working on the new PT route. They were next on my list as I didn't wanna remove previous data before adding new data as it might be seen as vandalism.
But the rest of the way to Nybro, those stations lacked duplicates but were removed anyway.

Did I misunderstand the wiki article on how to place the bus stops off to the side of the road where the stop is located? I tried following the wiki as well as how PT was done in the Stockholm area. Those looked like a match and a good frame of reference.
archie (2025-08-03 08:29:49+00:00): Stockholm is ptv1. These here are ptv2.
civ41 (2025-11-12 13:06:23+00:00): Hi voschix,
I did a survey a few months ago and wasn’t able to find any “cycleway” signs along Viale Roma indicating that this sidewalk is designated for bicycles.
That’s why I removed the tags. Maybe something has changed in the meantime. Could you tell me where exactly the signs are located?
Thanks!
voschix (2025-11-12 13:34:29+00:00): Looks the same to me. I do not remember why I inserted the change. 
There seem to be several situations of that kind in Vicenza, i.e. large sidewalks/footways that are used by cyclists, but are not signposted as such. Maybe the best way to reflect the reality on the ground would be highway=footway combined with bicycle=permissive? If you are a local mapper, please feel free to decide. I am an only an occasional visitor.
civ41 (2025-11-12 21:17:01+00:00): Yes, me too I was thinking about using bicycle=permissive, but I'm not 100% sure bicycles are tolerated. Definitely not in the narrow foot passages through Porta Castello. I'll try to pay attention on my next rides along the Viale and then decide. Thanks for your quick reaction!
pwbriggs (2025-08-03 00:12:30+00:00): Looks good to me; thanks for the contribution and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
dadavid (2025-08-05 11:14:51+00:00): Hi Marmoti, danke für deine Änderungen :) Deine Nutzung von disused=yes ist hier nicht ganz richtig, siehe auch das Wiki im zweiten Absatz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused?uselang=de

Hier wäre disused:amenity=clinic oder disused:amenity=doctors besser, dazu aus dem name ggf ein old_name machen :) 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused?uselang=de

Viele Grüße und weiterhin viel Spaß beim Mappen :) 

David
Marmoti (2025-08-10 19:54:55+00:00): Hallo,
habe meinen Edit mit User skunk persönlich besprochen.
Bin allerdings der Meinung, dass disused=yes besser passen würde.
Da ich vor Ort die Erhebung mache, weiß ich dass es ein einzelnes Gebäude war, in dem ein Radiologie-Zentrum betrieben wurde. Die Einrichtung wurde geschlossen und ist stattdessen umfirmiert in das Bezirkszentrum umgezogen.
Das ganze Gebäude steht jetzt leer, kann auch nicht ohne Umbauten in eine andere Einrichtung/Geschäft  umgewidmet werden und wird nicht genutzt, was bestimmt noch nicht alle Kunden dieser Einrichtung wissen. Demzufolge würde ich annehmen, dass es so etwas wie dauerhaft geschlossen gibt zu möglichen Öffnungszeiten, obwohl das auch wieder doppelt gemoppelt wäre mit disused. 
Für einen Neuling finde ich das nicht so einfach, zu entscheiden was jetzt "richtig" ist.
s. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:disused:*
"disused=yes + building=*	Ein ungenutztes Gebäude. Es ist besser, das einfache Tag disused=yes zu verwendern, da ein ungenutztes Gebäude immer noch ein Gebäude ist. Mit dem einfachen Tag disused=yes wird die One feature, one OSM element-Regel umso wichtiger."
Danke für die Info und beste Grüße
dadavid (2025-08-10 20:15:12+00:00): Hi :) 

Ja das ist echt komplex, aber so wie’s jetzt ist ist’s auf jeden Fall gut gelöst :) 

Wenn das ganze Gebäude nicht mehr genutzt wird, ist disused=yes am Gebäude richtig; problematisch war der intakte amenity=healthcare tag, der durch das disused=yes nicht einfach überschrieben wird. Aber so ist’s jetzt ja perfekt :) 

Viele Grüße und weiterhin viel Spaß bei OSM :)
felipeeugenio (2025-08-03 14:20:13+00:00): Estimado. por favor hacer cambios en lugares específicos y luego grabar. Luego de eso puede moverse a otro lugar. Estas ediciones están dispersas por toda la región casi y contienen muchos errores y son muy difíciles de corregir de éste modo.

gracias
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169882699
James2813 (2025-08-03 22:01:43+00:00): Estimado, disculpe las molestias por lo grande de la edición. A futuro haré distintas por cada zona. Gracias por el aviso, aunque el área de esta edición no sale de Casablanca... En fin, por favor precíseme si hay errores de formato para poder ayudar a corregirlos. Gracias.
felipeeugenio (2025-08-03 22:45:17+00:00): Hola. Gracias.
Si, pero una comuna entera sigue siendo demasiado grande. Por favor haga un par de cambios de una zona y luego grabe.
Es demasiado así.

saludos
0235 (2025-08-03 19:40:02+00:00): Some of it is open?! I think I am going to have to go there and bother them some more to see about getting some buildings! Thank-you for checking this out.
af7567 (2025-08-03 20:12:00+00:00): Only a very small section is currently open to provide access to the marketing suite and the show house. About 6 houses opposite the show house were also accessible.
0235 (2025-08-04 12:38:49+00:00): Thank-you. I may still go and bother them ;) though. The construction just to the south, around Foster Way / Chataway Drive, I went to the show house, and the lady working in there gave me a tour of the site, and told me what all of the names of the roads were going to be.
af7567 (2025-08-04 20:52:55+00:00): They actually have a siteplan available here: 
https://www.placesforpeople.co.uk/src/dist/img/siteplans/goldsmiths-green-jul25-siteplan.svg

and the key to the colours is halfway down the page here:
https://www.placesforpeople.co.uk/new-homes/find-a-new-home/goldsmiths-green/
user_5359 (2025-08-03 11:22:46+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You are first person with this key? Please have a look on httsp:wiki.osm.org or https://taginfo.osm.org/search?q=support
Comino (2025-08-03 08:31:42+00:00): Hi,

In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes".

Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag !
Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead.

For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Merchants#legacy-tags
and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bitcoin

Happy mapping,

Edwin
aharvey (2025-08-03 04:39:23+00:00): I've added some basic documentation about the tag at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:railway:cbtc since none existed and the tag is in use, but it would be good if any further information about what the tag means or how it could be applied could be added to the wiki.
WillieWoo257986 (2025-08-03 07:37:18+00:00): I added a section on the three variants described in the ORM tagging page. CBTC tends to be a pretty board term but it should be slightly more useful now.
Enock4seth (2025-09-14 16:01:01+00:00): Hi, I have reverted this changeset others. Do not upload data to OpenStreetMap if you don't know what you are doing.
aharvey (2025-08-03 05:28:07+00:00): My understanding from the Royal National Park is that if you're driving straight through from Loftus to Otford via Audley and don't stop you don't need to buy a national park pass, however in that case the road is considered a public road excluded from the park. I thought the same applied to all other parks, so driving through Riverside Drive here without stopping doesn't need a pass, but I'm not sure... The national parks website seems to indicate that if your vehicle enters the park you need a pass.
aharvey (2025-08-03 05:34:30+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/172868419 we should leave the bridge tags on the way, it's helpful for routing engines to also announce the bridge name as part of the route without needing to process the bridge area and apply those tags to the way.
green_leek (2025-08-03 05:56:25+00:00): I've opened a fixme (4889411) for the toll tag issue.
aharvey (2025-08-03 06:39:29+00:00): also for bridge:name at least I thought it could be kept on the highway.

I read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bridge:name which while it says it's prefered to use man_made=bridge + name it doesn't directly say that it shouldn't/can't co-exist with bridge:name so I'm not sure, I just thought that perhaps it's a good idea to retain it rather than delete it.

I checked the 3 main routing engines but none appear to use bridge:name.
Szymiii (2025-08-04 16:32:34+00:00): sftp://gddkia_przetargi@ftp.gddkia.gov.pl/O_Poznan_przetargi
NorthCrab_upload (2025-08-03 00:50:53+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1017397539

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
SomeoneElse (2026-04-27 23:01:49+00:00): I never new that the Welsh name for Stornoway was the same as the English - I'd have expected something much closer to the Scots Gaelic one!
SomeoneElse (2026-04-27 23:03:19+00:00): Actually - just noticed wikipedia: https://cy.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ste%C3%B2rnabhagh - is "Stornoway" OK here?
DanhengOSM (2025-08-05 10:23:51+00:00): a huge changeset!
one_half_3544 (2025-08-18 14:24:32+00:00): do you have a link to their (MChS) statement perhaps?