piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
bxl-forever (2025-10-21 22:58:53+00:00): Hello,

Please make sure to read the instructions when using StreetComplete.

The quest for recycling containers explicitely mentions the name of the operator.

One of the containers is operated by Terre.  They collect clothes.

In your edit, you mentioned that this container is for glass bottles.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/427547398/history/7

This is incorrect.  Terre does not collect glass bottles.  You used the wrong value, this is for the pair of containers by Bruxelles-Propreté/Net Brussel just besides.

I have a picture from the area, taken in July.
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1696916957611735

It looks like there is only the glass container and that the Terre container is gone.  Was it like this?
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-22 02:54:57+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8631280889
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13248205750
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13248205751

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Comino (2025-10-22 08:04:11+00:00): Hi,

In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes".

Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag !
Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead.

For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Merchants#tagging-guidance
and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bitcoin

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
https://btcmap.org/tagger/6794624
MassCartog (2025-10-21 18:11:15+00:00): Hello welcome to OSM. could you give more information about why you removed this road? It seems to exist on the ground, and is vary visible in aerial views.
SFCOSTP (2025-10-21 19:11:05+00:00): Per my comment: this property is owned by Santa Fe County. It is not open to the public and will not remain a road. We do not want folks to consider trespassing on this road. I am an employee of Santa Fe County, if you would like my contact info, please ask.
MassCartog (2025-10-21 22:57:58+00:00): Thanks for getting back to me. As you state, this road does exist right now, this makes it valid to be included on OSM. Discouraging trespassing is an invalid reason for data removal from OpenStreetMap.

You have a new account and might not be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground. If it exists on the ground, it is valid data regardless of a feature being public or private, designated or informal/illegal/unauthorized. Even decommissioned trails should not be removed until they no longer exist. Removing features that exist is actually considered vandalism.

The correct way to handle this is to use OSM's tagging system. access=private, or access=no would be appropriate if they are closed to the public. Once this is done, services that do use OSM data will reflect that and specify their access. This has now been done to this feature. Also, a lifecycle prefix could be used to better describe its current state.

Please read this for more info:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won't_delete_roads_on_private_property

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-23 02:48:26+00:00): reverted edits that added suspect names, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 remain not answered

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173652920
bxl-forever (2025-10-21 17:35:39+00:00): We don’t see a "city limit" sign here
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13248235328/history/1

Your edit has been reverted.
BER319 (2025-10-21 18:31:49+00:00): Guten Abend und willkommen bei OSM,

Du kannst also hier 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13248232988

wirklich die Autobahn überqueren? Das halte ich für nicht Möglich. Bitte nur das eintragen was auch wirklich da ist.

Du hast dich bestimmt von der Historische Messstrecke „Breites Gestell“ irrtümlich verleihen lassen. Da ist Path aber  auch falsch gewählt.
 
Also bitte einmal nachschauen und das entsprechend anpassen. Hilfe findest du dazu im Wiki. 

Sonst wird noch wirklich jemand über die Autobahn geroutet. Bitte immer an das Routing denken und ob du da wirklich lang gehen kannst.
Openminded320 (2025-10-22 10:29:59+00:00): ..korrigiert. Danke.

Deinem Alias zufolge könntest Du was mit Fliegerei zu tun haben...

VG
BER319 (2025-10-22 11:08:56+00:00): Hallo,

leider sehe ich hier immer noch einen Path incl. der Fußgängerüberwege auf der Autobahn. Bitte schaue dir das noch einmal an. Bitte stelle den Stand von 2022 wieder her.
Vielen Dank
Nekoatthegates (2025-10-22 16:27:04+00:00): Correction: Source used was Vantor satellite imagery via Vantor Hub 2025-10-19.
bxl-forever (2025-10-21 22:53:19+00:00): I don’t want to discourage you too much, but please observe that you have added *a lot* of new objects to OSM today, many of which were badly-tagged, non-existing or misplaced.

People will not want to use OSM if information they find here is incorrect or misleading.  We have had enough cases of people trying to play games on us by adding fantasy information just to see if we notice.  Doing this might get you banned from editing the map.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13248243181/history/1
information=guidepost is a tag for a very specific type of device.

There is no such object here, as this recent picture confirms.
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=375921111313359

Let’s assume good faith.  You wanted to map the street sign itself, didn’t you?
NeisBot (2025-10-21 17:30:43+00:00): Just to help illustrate what I mean, here is how your description could look in a more neutral, factual form: "Agence de location de voitures à Fès"
NeisBot (2025-10-21 17:30:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-10-26 10:17:39+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/173787097
rskedgell (2025-10-22 07:11:13+00:00): (Review requested)

Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for adding your business. I've tweaked the tagging a little to reflect OSM tagging conventions.
PTOX (2025-10-22 13:25:09+00:00): Hi rskedgell!
Thanks for that. Very new to all this.
Marek-M (2025-10-22 07:54:28+00:00): Wycofanie fikcyjnej edycji - brak poprawnych opisów changesetów, brak źródeł, dodane drogi nie mają potwierdzenia ani na ortofotomapie ani na EGIB

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173613889
Senihtu (2025-10-22 06:08:54+00:00): Guten Morgen!
Wenn die Bogenstraße in Langendiebach nun eine Einbahnstraße ist, dann fahren da jetzt etwa 10 Buslinien in die falsche Richtung.
Sind die Routen falsch oder gibt es eine Ausnahme für Linienbusse?
weiter happy mapping
Senihtu
Gino-52 (2025-10-22 18:51:17+00:00): Die Stadt hat die Bogenstraße, ein Stück von Auf der Beune und die Friedrich-Ebert-Straße in Einbahnstraßen umgewandelt.
Es ist alles so realisiert wie in diesem Artikel beschrieben.
https://www.op-online.de/region/main-kinzig-kreis/erlensee/in-friedrich-ebert-strasse-und-bogenstrasse-in-erlensee-gilt-bald-die-einbahn-regelung-93933339.html
Die Straßen sind geändert. Die Buslinien passe ich noch an. Das dauert aber noch ein paar Tage.
Marek-M (2025-10-22 07:54:29+00:00): Wycofanie fikcyjnej edycji - brak poprawnych opisów changesetów, brak źródeł, dodane drogi nie mają potwierdzenia ani na ortofotomapie ani na EGIB

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173613889
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-22 02:34:17+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1443760848

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1443760851

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-22 02:54:38+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1443760848

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1443760851

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
surveyor54 (2025-10-22 09:35:15+00:00): Hallo,
ist diese Straße wirklich ein Tunnel?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/78438902

Gruß
surveyor54
Radmaroeder (2025-10-22 11:08:18+00:00): Hallo,
sorry!!!
Die Straße ist kein Tunnel. Da muß ich aus versehen was angeklickt haben,
werde es berichtigen.
Ich muß in Zukunft alles nochmal kontrollieren.
Danke für die Aufmerksamkeit.
Gruß
N. Gerhard
surveyor54 (2025-10-22 13:56:15+00:00): Bitte, war mir halt aufgefallen. 👍
iandees (2025-10-21 19:29:36+00:00): Heya, thanks for adding to OSM. When you add these cameras, please make sure you aren't attaching them to anything else. In this case, for example, you attached the camera point to the sidewalk.

It's pretty easy to accidentally do this because the editor automatically snaps points like this to nearby lines. If you notice this happen, you can use the undo functionality to undo the snap. You can also right-click the point you added and use the "Extract" function to pull it off the line. I did it for you in this case.
FlockFlucker (2025-10-22 19:10:08+00:00): Thank you! You know, i do recall it snapping to that point when i added it and didn't think any thing of it. The camera is on the light pole and my brain must have thought it connected to that and not the sidewalk.  I will pay more attention in the future.
iandees (2025-10-22 19:16:10+00:00): No problem. It looks like the imagery is a little misaligned there so the sidewalk appears to be offset a bit, too.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-22 03:35:56+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Henryka Sucharskiego":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/337692010
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/875760584
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1095545291
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1095545299
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1210112709
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1210112710
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1261805048
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1261805049
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1261807004
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1261807005
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1322365299
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1322365300
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1322365301
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1322365302
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1322365303
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1322365304
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1322365305
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1322365306
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1322365307

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-22 03:45:53+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Henryka Sucharskiego":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/337692010
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/875760584
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1095545291
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1095545299
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1210112709
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1210112710
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1261805048
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1261805049
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1261807004
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1261807005
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1322365299
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1322365300
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1322365301
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1322365302
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1322365303
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1322365304
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1322365305
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1322365306
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1322365307

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Taksine (2025-10-23 04:32:01+00:00): This is China, why you change Russian in the name tag?
NathanBnm (2025-10-22 12:11:51+00:00): Bonjour David quelle est votre source pour les aménagements du parking relais et la distinction nord et sud ?
David Crochet (2025-11-02 19:19:40+00:00): https://www.facebook.com/Caenlamer/posts/les-travaux-dam%C3%A9nagement-du-futur-parking-relais-pompidou-sont-en-coursce-nouvel/1162443952648426/
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-22 03:45:57+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Henryka Sucharskiego":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/337692235
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/337692488
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/337692515

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-23 02:50:02+00:00): reverted edits that added suspect names, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 remain not answered

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173652939
streckenkundler (2025-10-24 20:10:55+00:00): @Mateusz Konieczny

Thank you for the revert. I am commenting specifically on this CS! The user in question has set ‘HauptFließ’ here. This is of course incorrect! The real name of the waterway is ‘Alte Oder’ (Old Oder), see also: https://bb-viewer.geobasis-bb.de/?layerIDs=237,9001,9000,159&visibility=true,true,true,true&transparency=0,0,0,0&center=464758. 79602235084.5817240.426149045&zoomlevel=7

We have other data sources that can be used with OSM to check comparable things!

The data source I mentioned can also be used for OSM.

Best regards,

Sven

Translated with DeepL.com (free version)
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-25 11:13:35+00:00): Thanks! I guess that it is one more confirmation that this person cannot be trusted. And thanks for adding real names!
streckenkundler (2025-10-25 20:14:21+00:00): I have recorded the first part of the real names with CS https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173765139 and CS https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173770747. However, there is still a lot to do in this area.

Sven
Yog Sot (2025-10-31 23:04:53+00:00): Sven, you should map it. 
We are not sure if MapRivers is mapping correctly, because he is unable to tell his sources and in places he was verified incorrect. 
So you're very welcome to verify and map your knowledge! :)
streckenkundler (2025-11-01 20:52:29+00:00): I map, but there is no active mapper in the area. I do my best with the means at my disposal...
AndyB_66 (2025-10-21 19:13:35+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
P_kawa (2025-10-22 18:08:42+00:00): No ok, będę stosował bardziej rozbudowane opisy zmian. Dla wyjaśnienia – "poprawki" używałem przy drobnych korektach moich edycji lub bardzo małych zmianach.
prino (2025-10-23 14:25:06+00:00): Restored access, but routers still seem to refuse to use it, see https://honnef-heute.de/auffahrt-siebengebirge-bleibt-laenger-gesperrt/ (Re-opened on 2025-10-10)
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-10-29 21:27:24+00:00): reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173949408
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-22 03:45:59+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1443779668

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
AndyB_66 (2025-10-21 19:10:51+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
felipeeugenio (2025-10-22 12:00:04+00:00): Hola. Buenos días.
Vemos que ha intervenido varias veces el mismo segmento de calle, cambiándo categorías y atributos, oncluso en un inicio estuvo bastante desplazado de su lugar original

Qué es lo que quiere conseguir? preguntamos para ayudarlo, porque pasa que si bien entendemos que es para usarlo con una aplicación de ruteo, el camino es claramente un camino de servicio para bomberos. Dificilmente puede justificarse otra categoría,
felipeeugenio (2025-10-22 12:01:34+00:00): Tampoco es correcto mapear solamente con aplicaciones de ruteo en mente. OSM solo mapea la realidad en terreno. Si las aplicaciones de ruteo tienen limitaciones para interpretar lo que hay en terreno, entonces deben corregirse a ese nivel, no reinterpretar lo que hay en terreno hasta que la app funcione.

Saludos y quedamos atentos
AndyB_66 (2025-10-21 19:10:43+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-22 03:46:02+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1443781262
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1443781263

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-22 03:35:50+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/151285142
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1443782964

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-22 03:45:52+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/151285142
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1443782964

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-22 03:46:04+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Henryka Sucharskiego":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1443785005
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1443785006
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1443785007
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1443785008
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1443785009

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Konrad95 (2025-10-21 20:39:59+00:00): Cześć,
pamiętaj, że tam, gdzie relacje autobusowe zawierają węzły przystanków (a nie perony w formie linii lub obszaru), nie dodajemy tagu public_transport=platform do tych peronów, gdyż dubluje on ten sam tag występujący na węźle przystanku, umieszczanym obok drogi. Właściwy sposób tagowania krawędzi przystankowych to highway=platform i bus=yes. https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/bus-ztm-warszawa/5105/32

Oczywiście inaczej sprawa wygląda w miastach, gdzie relacje autobusów zawierają perony obszarowe/liniowe (np. Radom).

Tak więc twoja zmiana jest nieprawidłowa.
Jrachi (2025-10-22 11:50:05+00:00): Ciao.
Hai aggiunto la way 69325110 al percorso 332C.
Così viene sovrapposto al 303.
Hai visto della segnaletica a Laux che indica 332C?
Se così fosse è un errore da correggere direttamente sul cartello. Potrebbe essere un cartello di avvicinamento e andrebbe giustamente sulla relazione, ma solo il guidepost e non la way. 
Ivo
Dardy (2025-10-22 12:32:04+00:00): Ciao Ivo, l'ho sistemato, è stato aggiunto erroneamente mentre segmentavo strada, ora dovrebbe essere ok. Non c'è nessuna segnaletica inerente il 332C
gabro00 (2025-10-22 05:58:39+00:00): Az U számok talán a ref:HU:vending_reg címkébe tartoznak, a ref az amit a földi halandó is megtalál és keres. Innen néztem: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4880531413
GBAB (2025-10-22 09:30:11+00:00): Ezek nekem mindig homályosak, mindenesetre most kikalapáltam.
A67-A67 (2025-10-25 19:38:44+00:00): Deze wijziging is incorrect. ALDI wordt met hoofdletters geschreven, ook in lopende tekst. Daarom heb ik de brand- en name-tags hersteld.

De iD-editor geeft suggesties bij diverse winkelketens, maar let op: dit zijn slechts suggesties en geen foutmeldingen. Er zitten veel false positives in, waardoor ze altijd gecontroleerd moeten worden.
Norbert Wołowiec (2025-10-22 06:28:40+00:00): If you are already restoring some changes, pay attention to all the things like maxspeed on individual fragments, because now it's a mess.
Yog Sot (2025-10-22 10:47:08+00:00): you're welcome to add those, just don't divide highway geometry where it can be tagged just fine
NeisBot (2025-10-21 20:24:34+00:00): Hi seymabuse, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 98% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 52 building(s)
- 1 landuse(')

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=173600509
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2025-10-22 07:37:49+00:00): The fictitious change has been reverted.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173613293
user_5359 (2025-10-22 06:56:52+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Don't add building to a property, if there exists some buildings.
mueschel (2025-10-22 17:42:17+00:00): Hi,
could you check the ref tags? Which one is the correct spelling?

ref:SE:dairienr
ref:SE:darienr
ref:SE:diarienr
Tobias Conradi (2025-10-22 17:49:51+00:00): Thank you! ref:SE:diarienr - I made some mistakes and am currently fixing.

All misspellings after "ref:SE:" will appear at https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=ref%3ASE%3A 

And I can then find the elements with overpass.

Thanks again!
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-01 21:53:29+00:00): Hello!

You used
cuisine=hot_pot
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13248700652/history

Have you maybe meant
cuisine=hotpot
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
NoctZan (2026-02-02 16:08:09+00:00): Hello, I used cuisine=hot_pot as that is what I saw listed in the [cuisine wiki page's commonly-used values list](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cuisine#Style_or_Place:~:text=hot%5Fpot)

After looking at the [hot pot wiki page](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cuisine=hot_pot) though, it looks like cuisine=hotpot is used more so I will change it to that instead.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-02 16:23:34+00:00): Interesting, I missed it

I asked on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User_talk:Yaindrop whether this change was discussed at all or is it undiscussed
Dušan Kreheľ (2025-10-21 21:13:14+00:00): Right source map: DTM high-resolution shading
3ngineer (2025-10-23 06:08:40+00:00): Hi nyanpsyche, what is your source for this data? I don't see how the southern portion of this cable could continue down Prince Edward St, because according to BC Hydro maps, it connects Murrin and Mt Pleasant Substations (Alberta & West 6th Ave). Also, what is your source for the ref code 2L53? This code is already used for a cable connected to Mainwaring Sub, which doesn't connect to Murrin as far as I know! Thanks!
nyanpsyche (2025-10-23 20:24:07+00:00): Hey there! For the portion along Main Street between Prior & National Avenue, I worked on a project at an adjacent building site where we had a BCOC & review with the BC Hydro.

This is from their Transmissions team:

"BC Hydro Underground Transmission Circuit 2L053 is installed under Main Street.  This section of 2L053 is a 230,000 volts, concrete duct bank installed, cable circuit that is approximately 4.3m west of the property line."

Our utility locators were also able to confirm the presence of the conduit under the road.

Similarly, we had projects near E2nd & Main, and along Prince Edward which had this same transmission conduit.

I think the BC Hydro maps might be out of date because we keep running into transmission lines where we don't expect them!