piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2025-05-29 10:07:29+00:00): Hi ATK123, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Added industrial buildings and landuse areas by creating new nodes and ways with corresponding tags."

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment #AIgenerated #Gibberish
Szymson (2025-05-29 13:30:26+00:00): Co to za bzdety? XD Po co ten duplikat kościoła?
stasiu512 (2025-05-29 13:39:27+00:00): service_times=Nieznane xD 
nie no cała zmiana do revertu bez wątpienia
bartgron (2025-05-29 21:31:16+00:00): Wycofane:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166943892
grzegorz75jan (2025-05-30 11:26:55+00:00): Całe konto do wykopania. Wystarczy popatrzeć na nazwę i to co stworzył.
Dodko (2025-05-29 18:30:54+00:00): Názov obce je Vráble a len časť obce je Dyčka, taktiež Dyčka nemá pridelenú ulicu v adresách. 
Opravil som https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=166935460
NeisBot (2025-05-29 10:12:46+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description
NeisReview (2025-05-30 07:03:39+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/166955321
grzegorz75jan (2025-05-29 15:33:52+00:00): Stworzyłeś potworka highway=construction. 
Brakuje construction=fooway

Przestań w końcu namiętnie używać opisów zmian w stylu poprawki. Oczywiście nie dotyczy to akurat tej edycji.

Dla twojego dobra pozwolę sobie nie sprawdzać czy upominałem cię już wcześniej o te "opisy" zmian.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian

https://youtu.be/xBMIoypkdI4?list=PLTgtPjgzssHzsgAqYbi2QfRoRk1S9ioX5&t=2596
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166912757
user_5359 (2025-05-30 13:04:36+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1390672968. What is the mean of the tags
edia = vi:Đường cao tốc La Sơn – Túy Loan
wikipname = Cầu KM55+411.58 giai đoạn 2
I assume a copy & paste error
Herwescheluc (2025-05-29 20:56:06+00:00): Da sind einfach zuviele Fehler drin - daher alles auf Anfang!

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166942797
Herwescheluc (2025-05-29 20:56:09+00:00): Hallo, cube@,

erstmal willkommen bei OSM!

Leider wimmelt es in diesem CS vor Fehlern, die Dir sogar angezeigt wurden (siehe genau oberhalb dieses Textes). Zudem hast Du dabei übersehen, das Du einen Punkt "mitgenommen" hast und damit das Straßennetz erheblich verändert hast (siehe hier auf achavi:https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=166914171). Außerdem wird ein Radweg nicht mit name=Radweg versehen und der access=no ist im Fußweg schon impliziert, daher ist beides überflüssig! Ist da ein Schild, welches Pferde explizit verbietet? Es fehlt zudem, dass der Weg nicht durch eine Linie getrennt ist, also segregated=no.

Das wird ziemlich viele Fehler in den  diversen Qualitätssicherungstools (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Qualit%C3%A4tssicherung) aufscheinen lassen.

Ich setze das daher mal wieder auf Anfang zurück.

Nix für ungut, aber lies Dir bitte die im iD angezeigten blauen Links ins Wiki immer gut durch, dann kann man viele Fehler vorab vermeiden. 

Und stets gut schauen, was am Ende an Meldungen steht und auf der "Karte" zu sehen ist - und dann erst speichern, bitte.

Grüße aus Herborn

Andreas
cube@ (2025-05-30 06:07:56+00:00): Hallo, und vielen Dank für die Berichtigung. Eigentlich wollte ich hier nur ändern, daß man auf dem Radweg das Rad nicht schieben muß wie auf Komoot angezeigt.
Es war nicht meine Absicht hier das Straßennetz zu verändern ist tatsächlich nicht aufgefallen.
Vielen Dank nochmal für das überarbeiten.
yannikbloscheck (2025-05-29 10:47:19+00:00): Forgot changing details of the main path accordingly. I did that retroactively with change 166914364.
olo81 (2025-06-10 21:28:44+00:00): Ścieżki rowerowe odpowiednio tagujemy. 
Tagowanie, które wprowadziłeś nie występuje. 
Przeczytaj wiki popraw to:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Rowery
C2oc4 (2025-06-13 06:20:45+00:00): Znaczy się chodzi o to że dostałem odpowiedź z PZD Będzin, że dana ścieżka/trasa rowerowa dopuszcza ruch pieszych i dlatego tak zmieniłem
olo81 (2025-06-13 06:31:49+00:00): Jeśli tam jest tylko znak C13 i ktoś powiedział że można tam chodzić to wprowadził cię w błąd.
Prawo zakazuje chodzenia po ścieżkach rowerowych.
Jeśli w urzędzie chcą żeby tam można było chodzić niech zmienią oznakowanie.
Znaki wskazują co można a czego nie można.
C2oc4 (2025-07-07 10:00:01+00:00): Olo niestety nie zgadzam się z Tobą. Można chodzić po ścieżce rowerowej jeśli nie ma chodnika pod kilkoma warunkami np. rowerzysta ma  pierwszeństwo itp.

Np.:
https://mazowiecka.policja.gov.pl/wwe/aktualnosci/116059,Rowerzysta-i-pieszy-na-drodze-podstawowe-zasady.html

oraz 

https://sip.lex.pl/akty-prawne/dzu-dziennik-ustaw/prawo-o-ruchu-drogowym-16798732/art-11
olo81 (2025-07-07 10:06:03+00:00): Ok, masz rację. Jeszcze się zastanowię jaki dokładnie tam dać tag.
olo81 (2025-07-07 11:17:19+00:00): Dałem tam z powrotem foot=yes bo nic lepszego nie przychodzi mi do głowy. Może na discordzie ktoś coś lepszego zaproponuje. 
Jak będziesz mieć takie nieoczywiste miejsca, jak to, dodawaj komentarze. Inni mapujący będą wiedzieć, dlaczego akurat takie tagowanie, które na pierwszy rzut oka jest niewłaściwe.
C2oc4 (2025-07-22 06:51:23+00:00): Ok nie ma sprawy
gpsbob (2025-05-29 10:53:23+00:00): Is the house number of Green Triangle Electronics in a suitable format? Is the phone number formatted correctly? My fans are so creative! This is what I would look like as a cookie. Yum...
fortera_au (2025-05-29 23:20:45+00:00): The address formatting looks good to me, aadr:state, addr:postcode and addr:suburb are redundant in Australia since we have that fully covered by relations and that can be obtained easily when needed.

For the phone number, you'll want the international format, in this case it would be phone=+61 8 8724 2222
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166914517
fortera_au (2025-05-29 23:21:56+00:00): I've corrected it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166946301 for you
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166914517
gpsbob (2025-05-30 08:51:28+00:00): I see. Thanks for the correction!
Sylabowy Kot (2025-05-29 22:36:23+00:00): Skasowałem w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166945327 odnogę, którą dodałeś przy budowie osiedla Nowa Praga, co schodziła za halę 82D. Nie wymyślaj, że buduje się droga, na podstawie samych zdjęć satelitarnych, podczas gdy da się dokopać na stronie inwestycji (którą zalinkowałem w tagach) do planu zagospodarowania.
Sylabowy Kot (2025-05-29 22:57:19+00:00): Swoją drogą, może i jestem młodszy stażem w OSM, ale boję się widoku takiego zestawienia jak "szybkie drogi", edytor iD oraz zdjęcia satelitarne jako jedyny podkład. Z tego, co widzę, to w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166914211 usunąłeś nawet historyczny układ toru testowego FSO, zostawiając jakiś ogryzek i dając scruba...

Serio, jeśli mapujesz więcej takich rzeczy, to stosuj podkłady! Ja te changesety chyba zrevertuję oraz poddam ocenie inne zmiany, gdyż twój brak przejścia na lepsze narzędzia w ciągu ponad 1,5k zmian budzi moje wątpliwości.
Sylabowy Kot (2025-05-29 23:10:03+00:00): A, i skasowałeś też część opuszczonych torów. Po co, jak społeczność woli jak zostają stare biegi torów? Poznaj taką stronkę jak Achavi: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=166914520
ieuanj (2025-05-29 10:56:26+00:00): A further edit could potentially also tag all of these as bicycle:permit, since club membership or a day pass is required for all trails here.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-06-14 04:43:20+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167598696
Layft Greater (2025-09-08 08:25:27+00:00): Why entrances (exits) to underground parking were removed? It seems like an unnecessary change.

Ikea:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10738176174/history/3

Mall:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12246713729/history/1
themi97 (2025-09-09 12:57:02+00:00): The edit was quite extensive and done in OsmInEdit, meaning I had to redraw most of the buildings, update the indoor map, and then adjust the surrounding features. If something was deleted, it was purely accidental. In this case, there really wasn’t a need to comment; if something’s missing, it can just be added back. A comment would only make sense if deletion was the actual intention of the edit, which it wasn’t. On that note I’ve also noticed that some features have been deleted multiple times in the past, so I just restored and corrected things rather than commenting on every single change unnecessarily. It’s also pretty common for features to get deleted, whether by accident or sometimes even vandalism.
Layft Greater (2025-09-10 12:24:21+00:00): Could you please restore the four deleted nodes? That would be much appreciated—thank you!
themi97 (2025-09-10 15:02:42+00:00): I don't know what's wrong at your end but to me all of the entrances are showing except the one for IKEA which I added
Dodko (2025-05-29 17:36:10+00:00): Vyhliadku treba mať ako samostatný bod
lavičky tiež ako bod, do name sa dáva skutočný názov objektu  a nie opisný názov.
ajxm (2025-12-29 04:00:38+00:00): Source: Local Knowledge
HSK Berkelah is labelled by Hutanwatch as being divided between Termeloh (see Temerloh) and Kuantan. This is an error. It is split between Kuantan District, Maran District and Jerantut District.
mataharimau (2026-03-29 08:37:41+00:00): Local knowledge is king. Thank you for your correction and contribution.
kitsee (2025-12-10 20:04:05+00:00): Hello,
Could you please refrain from changing name to official_name on transformers and substations. thank you.
ohmanger (2025-12-11 16:04:45+00:00): Hi, could you please explain why?

My understanding is that these are descriptions given by National Grid and rarely (if ever) used in the real world. official_name gives this context.
kitsee (2025-12-11 18:03:12+00:00): My view is that official_name only makes sense if there is a more common alternative name to take its place in the "name" tag. here there is none and there is no standard convention of using official_name instead of name with transformers and substations.
basically all substations and a lot of pole transformers have a plaque that lists its name and ref.
SomeoneElse (2025-12-14 15:00:35+00:00): Some of these things really have verifiable names - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/731794606 is an example (I was surprised by that because it looks like an import error, but isn't)
kitsee (2025-12-14 15:12:01+00:00): National Grid Distributions formerly Wester Power Distributions have been very reliable in adding a name and ref plaque to every ground substation. pole transformers can be hit and miss. 

Admittingly the names can be very out of date since some of these substations could be closing on 100 years old now.
kitsee (2025-12-14 15:13:23+00:00): To clarify when i say out of date i mean that whatever the substation was named after is long gone. the substations names never seem to get updated once assigned.
ohmanger (2025-12-16 10:55:11+00:00): I had a look at a couple of pole transformers on my walk today and couldn't see anything visible on the grey box apart from a ref on the pole.

From the wiki:
"Do not use name=* if:
The feature is unnamed in the real world"

If its hit and miss perhaps "ref_name" would be more appropriate for the pole transformers?
ohmanger (2025-12-16 11:30:35+00:00): Another thing I've noticed is that "Substation" or "Transformer" is prepended to most (all?) of the the nodes you've added - is this from the NG data source?

I have verified that some substations don't have this as part of their name
e.g. https://osm.org/node/9974532958 is labelled as "Shelton Flds." [Sic] Adding "Substation" here would be descriptive and redundant thanks to the tags.

Sorry to be a bore, to be clear I generally think this information is useful, I'm just a bit cautious about imported datasets.
kitsee (2025-12-16 11:37:52+00:00): You're misunderstanding what the wiki is saying, its saying if a feature is truly unnamed, that is not known by any name to any person. this is true for many roads, some only have refs others are too minor and don't have any known name or ref at all. in these situations don't use the name=* tag and use the noname=yes tag instead. 

These transformers have been named, they have one and only one name as such using any name variant other than name=* doesn't make sense. 

The fact that the name is not printed on the feature is not a issue. As the same wiki page states the source of a name can be "Common or official usage". this is the same for many features like for example a forest. it may not have a sign on the ground stating the name of the forest but that doesn't make the forest unnamed since a name is simply a identifier used by a group of people to identify a particular object.
SomeoneElse (2025-12-16 11:38:24+00:00): Just to be clear, my example above IS named with that name in the real world - I specifically checked because the name rhat had been added looks like a spreadsheet faux pas. However, that's what the sign on it says - it is definitely a "name".
If you have surveyed to check that it is not named in the real world, then reflecting that info in OSM does make sense, of course.
kitsee (2025-12-16 11:46:05+00:00): The "substation", "pole transformer", "primary","grid" and "supergrid" postfixs are added intentionally and is a UK wide standard the uk osm power community knows about it and its contradiction to norms but at the moment nothing has be decided so I am simply maintaining the status que.
ohmanger (2025-12-16 15:42:53+00:00): Thanks for the replies!

On reflection its mainly the addition of the postfixes that are giving me "this dataset should not be the name tag" vibes, especially with the "Pole Transformers" everywhere.

Looking at the "Open Infrastructure Map" project I'm getting the sense this is a case of mapping for render.

I appreciate could do with wider discussion so I'll hold fire changing the names already mapped.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-06-14 05:27:28+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed doubtful import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167599357
gurglypipe (2025-05-29 13:03:43+00:00): Please don’t “remove unnecessary detail”. One person’ ‘unnecessary detail’ is another person’s pet project. As long as the detail is correct, it should stay. :)
ThomasChurchman (2025-05-29 14:02:23+00:00): I agree. In this case, the path is barely visible and on a scree field, so the path is slightly changing over time. The way wasn't aligned anymore, and the number of nodes used effectively claimed the existence of a well-defined path where in reality there isn't one.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-06-14 05:02:12+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed doubtful import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167598943
NorthCrab_upload (2025-05-29 11:21:13+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9813902971
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9813902970
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9813902969
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/300549250
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1390684564
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/846352534

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/845709076

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
bxl-forever (2025-05-29 11:29:20+00:00): Hello,

"Subspace" is the name of the cafe, it is already properly written on the POI: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6966406043

Please do not duplicate the name on the door itself.
NeisBot (2025-05-29 11:52:33+00:00): Hi West Park Animal Hospital, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Added a new veterinary hospital with detailed contact information and opening hours."

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment #AIgenerated #Gibberish
eggie (2025-05-29 12:24:58+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback///  Gebruikelijk is om dat access=private te taggen. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-05-29 12:29:51+00:00): Ik heb het aangepast naar private.. Mocht het helemaal niet meer bestaan dan kun je het ook verwijderen.
MVG
eggie
Tuunker (2025-05-29 15:27:54+00:00): Het pad bestaat in het geheel niet meer en is omgeturnd naar tuin.
Maar ik kan geen mogelijkheid vinden hoe het verwijderd moet worden.
Graag een hint.
MVG,
Tuunker
eggie (2025-05-29 15:53:41+00:00): Met editor iD  met de linker muisknop selecteren en vervolgens delete toetsen.
of na selectie met de rechter muisknop het menu openen en dan staat onderaan een prullenbakje. Vervolgens opslaan.

Succes,
eggie
eggie (2025-05-29 15:54:46+00:00): basisbewerkingen iD
https://learnosm.org/nl_NL/beginner/id-editor/#basisbewerkingen-met-id
eggie (2025-05-30 11:38:23+00:00): Ik heb het pad verwijderd
gr eggie
eggie (2025-05-29 12:27:12+00:00): Dag growing,

Maar wellicht heeft het pand nog wel een adres?  Dat heb je nu ook verwijderd.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-05-29 12:28:18+00:00): Het adres heb ik hersteld.
MVG
eggie
todeveni (2025-05-29 13:22:14+00:00): Polku ei ole yksityinen, vaan kaupungin maalla, vaikka se vaikuttaisikin jonkun omalta. Olen käynyt pyörällä polun päässä viime talvena.
leveskockaa (2025-06-16 09:29:58+00:00): Szia!

Átállítottál ezzel a módosításcsomaggal egy utat kerékpárútnak, de ez nem tükrözi a valóságot, és problémákat fog okozni autós útvonaltervezésnél.

Hello!

You have converted a road to cycleway with this changeset, but this does not reflect reality and will cause problems when planning car routes.
NeisBot (2025-05-29 12:00:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description
NeisReview (2025-05-30 07:03:09+00:00): There's something strange here: Ice cream and place of warship?
rskedgell (2025-05-29 23:24:12+00:00): Maybe, but it's definitely not an A road with green primary route signage. B roads are tagged as highway=secondary

The tagging for NSL on a single carriageway is:
maxspeed=60 mph
maxspeed:type=GB:nsl_single

Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166946351
rskedgell (2025-05-29 23:20:16+00:00): I'm pretty sure that no part of Kiln Lane or the B4440 are highway=trunk. None of them is an A road with green primary route signage, which is what this tag means in the UK.

Please read and ensure that you have understood the documentation before changing any other highway tags.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Roads_in_the_United_Kingdom

Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166946284
BCNorwich (2025-05-29 13:36:43+00:00): Hi, I've reverted this changeset as it makes Thomas Road a very long gate, I don't think its gated anyway. Another highway had a solar panel dragged onto it.

Regards Bernard
elsy1 (2025-06-01 15:03:41+00:00): reverted vandal edir please be aware
NorthCrab_upload (2025-05-29 12:20:55+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10226418012
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/437832812

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2025-05-29 12:20:58+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3148272067
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/107903409

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
szydzio (2025-08-11 11:09:34+00:00): Hi Ivan! While I agree with restoring the deleted objects, but is it really necessary/correct (I keep in mind https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element) to maintain the name "Piazza San Marco" repeated on each of the 12 highway=pedestrian? After all, there's only one name and it's already marked (correctly) as a square: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/172349507 . Same goes to Piazzetta San Marco nearby... What's the gain of that ? Regards
ivanbranco (2025-08-11 11:26:37+00:00): I don't have a strong opinion on this. In my view, this information is not incorrect, and it can help routers use the name for guidance (since place=square is not routable). The real issue, in my opinion, is the number of highway segments, which should be simplified. Reducing the number of ways, while keeping routing intact, would also reduce visual clutter on renderers.
ivanbranco (2025-08-11 11:35:29+00:00): Another idea could be to keep just a few of the main highways, and change the others to something like highway=footway+footway=link
szydzio (2025-08-13 11:50:29+00:00): Would something like that be acceptable  https://i.imgur.com/rh1hzoW.png ? Main connection thus routing sustained, ways simplified.
ivanbranco (2025-08-13 11:54:31+00:00): Looks fine to me. Btw I hope you have/had fun Italy :D
szydzio (2025-08-13 16:47:33+00:00): Sure I had, as always in IT :-) 
Visiting, tasting & mapping of course :D 
My next project for Venice would be adding/importing all the missing addresses.
My soul aches seeing the project started at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue/Venice_addresses_import , but not really completed ;-(
So - a lot of work still to be done !