piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2025-09-14 19:02:35+00:00): Ik geloof je direct, maar klopt je accesstag dan wel met die forward en backward tags. Die zijn van de voorgaande mapper. 
Als het voor alle richtingen visaversa geldt dan kunnen die tags toch gewoon weg.

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=171930370

C12 is overigens niet van toepassing voor bromfietsen. 
Dan zou dat moped en mofa =yes bijgetagd moeten worden als uitzondering. 

Hier even een link hoe we de bebording taggen.
Overzicht Nederlandse verkeersborden
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Overzicht_Nederlandse_Verkeersborden

C12 is dan motor_vehicle=no & moped=yes & mofa=yes & traffic_sign=NL:C12

en dan door dat onderbord motor_vehicle=destination
met 
moped=yes & mofa=yes & traffic_sign=NL:C12

Kijk je nog even? 

Gr eggie
Karel973 (2025-09-14 19:27:08+00:00): Ik heb het aangepast. Zou je willen kijken of het zo klopt?
eggie (2025-09-14 19:31:42+00:00): Ik kijk even.... moment
Kyzuda (2025-09-14 17:54:02+00:00): ya ini dibutuhkan
Gregory Peony (2025-09-14 18:49:13+00:00): Weclome to OSM Josh! You identified buildings in the imagery and tagged them correctly but the imagery allows for them to be mapped more accurately; they are generally oversized and should be squared. Please watcht this short video to laern the basics of building mapping in the ID editor. https://youtu.be/Xs5wX592E1o

The following are some comprehensive comments regarding the previous points;

When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom in so that you can see the outline of the building and mark the corners carefully. Exclude shadows and yards when tracing the footprint. Keep in mind that you are looking at the [roofs of buildings](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape#Roof_shape), but mapping their footprints. Depending on how the scene is lit, pitched roofs may have light and dark sections that belong to one building. Generally pitched roofs overhang the walls of a building, so a footprint slightly smaller than the roof is accurate. You can scale selected features in ID with shift+(-/+), or JOSM with ctrl.+alt+Lclick & drag.  Take care to make contributions that others can build upon.

After tracing and tagging features which are likely square or round, please remember to square their corners (q), or circularise them (o), because it is almost impossible and time consuming to draw shapes so percisely by hand. Buildings with metal or pitched roofs tend to have square corners; round buildings are identifiable by the distinctive cresent shaped shadow they cast. Unless the building is clearly a different shape then it's best to assume that it should be rounded or its corners should be squared. In the iD Editor, you can right click for access to editing functions. Since roofs tend to overhang walls trace the initial shape slightly smaller to allow a buffer for any change in size that may occur. In JOSM use the [buildingstools plugin](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/BuildingsTools). In ID you must draw the shape accurately enough else shapes will not completely square. This [video about squaring features in ID](https://youtu.be/Xs5wX592E1o) has more information and a demo.

I hope you find this helpful.
Gregory Peony (2025-09-14 18:53:14+00:00): See how I mapped these buildings in https://osmcha.org/changesets/171932108
Gregory Peony (2025-09-14 19:19:50+00:00): See how I mapped these buildings in https://osmcha.org/changesets/171933411   Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171930543
Piagno (2025-09-14 17:55:28+00:00): source=survey
nleanba (2025-09-23 14:30:52+00:00): Hi! Bitte beachte, dass solche find-and-replace Edits welche eher stur outdated tags und andere Warnungen beheben, nicht gern gesehen sind: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct („Unter keinen Umständen sollte dieses »überholte« Tag in größerem Umfang (semi-)automatisch geändert werden, ohne den Verhaltenskodex für automatisierte Änderungen zu beachten“)

Solche grossen Edits wie dieser sind ausserdem schwer zu überprüfen. 

Zu ein paar deiner Änderungen habe ich konkrete Fragen/Anmerkungen:

• https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/114025465 Hier hast du ein FIXME= zu einem fixme= geändert. Das scheint mir pointless. Ausserdem scheint es mir, dass das FIXME eh schon behoben war, hätte also auch direkt entfernt werden können.

• https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/106427864 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1094459517 hast du zu railway=turntable geändert. Die alten tags als railway=disused bzw =abandoned scheinen mir korrekter, warum diese Änderung?

• https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/41222066 hast du als utility=gas getaggt, allerdings sagt das wiki: „If, and only if, a given industrial area is dedicated to an utility activity, it is possible to use utility=* with the corresponding value.“ Das ist hier nicht der Fall. Die Gasproduktion wurde hier 1972, die Gasspeicherung 1991 eingestellt.

• https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1628124348 hast du als unmarked crossing getaggt, auf allen Luftbildern (d.h. spätestens noch 2024) war hier aber ein Zebrastreifen. Stimmt das so?
Gregory Peony (2025-09-14 19:40:46+00:00): Hi, you are generally identifying buildings. A few of the buildings you mapped are almost as accurate as the imagery allows. Consider that you are looking at the roofs of buildings which likely overhang the walls somewhat. You created invalid shared nodes between buildings and a residnetial area: hold alt to prevent this. Good job trying to map the shape of the western building and not just making it a rectangle. A few of the buildings here have needlessly complex shapes, becasue they envelope multiple buildings; consider if a simple shape can accurately represent a feature before trying other options. See how I mapped some of these in https://osmcha.org/changesets/171934078

When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom in so that you can see the outline of the building and mark the corners carefully. Exclude shadows and yards when tracing the footprint. Keep in mind that you are looking at the [roofs of buildings](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape#Roof_shape), but mapping their footprints. Depending on how the scene is lit, pitched roofs may have light and dark sections that belong to one building. Generally pitched roofs overhang the walls of a building, so a footprint slightly smaller than the roof is accurate. You can scale selected features in ID with shift+(-/+), or JOSM with ctrl.+alt+Lclick & drag.  Take care to make contributions that others can build upon.

Please do not connect the corners of buildings to other buildings or features such as highways or residential areas. In the iD Editor, hold down the `Alt` key to prevent your cursor from snapping to existing data and accidentally creating shared(grey) nodes. This [video about connected nodes](https://youtu.be/ltn1VOiq5_0) has more information and a guide.

Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
Langlaeufer (2025-09-16 07:21:02+00:00): Hallo Kraxlfix, Du hast hier ja einige Wege korrigiert. Es scheinen südlich der Burg noch einige zu fehlen und auch der Anschluss an die Straße ist im Luftbild nicht nachvollziehbar. Hast du genug Ortskenntnis um zu bestätigen, ob das Luftbild noch korrket ist, oder wurde dort umgestaltet?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171931481
kraxlfix (2025-09-16 08:07:04+00:00): Hallo Langläufer,
bei Gelegenheit werde ich den Wegverlauf einmal vor Ort verifizieren. (Der Anschluss der Wege an die Straße erscheint tatsächlich gemäß Luftbild nicht mehr zu stimmen...)
LG kraxlfix
Langlaeufer (2025-09-16 08:18:19+00:00): Hab das nach Luftbild aktualisiert.  Überprüfung vor Ort wäre nett.
Danke
Legimet (2025-12-06 02:29:36+00:00): Hi, this seems like a mistake? The diet:vegan/vegetarian=only tags are for places that *only* serve vegan/vegetarian food, respectively. In other words, diet:vegan=only is for a place that does not serve any animal products at all, and diet:vegetarian=only is for places that don't serve any meat. I'm going to change it to "yes".
Tatfahren (2025-09-15 10:43:04+00:00): Du hast keine Quelle angegeben. 

Kannst du diese vielleicht hier nachreichen?
johnny_1982 (2025-09-15 17:10:08+00:00): Ich stand vor 5 Monaten mit meinem Fahrrad vor diesem Briefkasten und habe ihn in OSM hinzugefügt. Ich bin erst jetzt dazu gekommen die Daten von meinem Fotos nachzutragen.
Joseph R P (2025-11-25 21:15:10+00:00): Hello, why are the holes in the woods multipolygons circularized? Was this accidental or intentional?
Philip Newton (2025-11-26 06:50:15+00:00): Intentional -- I felt it was impossible to create an accurate shape, and I thought a circle looks neater than some random jagged approximation based on how the crowns of the trees look.
Joseph R P (2025-11-26 21:21:51+00:00): I would say the latter would look better and be more accurate just because the circularized areas here would imply that the trees actually do form a clearcut circle around the houses like that in reality, while a rough estimation tracing the canopy of the woods would at least be more true to the actual shape of the woods.

That aside, huge thank you for mapping all this landuse and woods around the Danville area. You've clearly put a lot of time an effort into this project making this area that was just recently completely blank look more colorful and well-mapped.
eggie (2025-09-14 19:53:33+00:00): Hoi,
Wanneer het echt een rotonde is en je verplicht de juiste richting moet volgen dan denk ik nog wel aanpassen.
Een echte rotonde heeft de tag junction=roundabout, maar dat is niet vaak het geval op die prive terreinen. 
Wanneer je aan beide kanten mag passeren is het oke.
Mocht iemand oneway=yes gaan taggen dan klopt de rijrichting niet. (Dus wegrichting omkeren) 
Dat 'rondje' kan dan beter ook losgeknipt worden van de rest van de toegangsweg.
Up to you
eggie
Karel973 (2025-09-14 20:03:30+00:00): Rotonde is aangepast.
eggie (2025-09-14 20:12:35+00:00): Oke, maar het blijft natuurlijk de vraag of het wel een officiele rotonde is.
Dus voorrang op de rotonde zelf?
We kennen ook de tag 
junction=circular

Ik denk eerder dat het dat is. De hamvraag is dus heb je voorrang op her 'rondje'? 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Dcircular
Karel973 (2025-09-14 20:48:33+00:00): Toen ik er was reed er niemand het rondje. Ze reden bijna allemaal tegen de richting in naar Links als je vanaf de slagboom komt. Er staat ook geen bord dat het moet.
eggie (2025-09-14 20:54:15+00:00): Oke... dan geen roundabout..
MelancholicSlav (2025-09-16 00:15:03+00:00): I think you are looking for 'service=driveway' and 'driveway=pipestem'. This is documented in the OSMWiki but does not have an iD preset.
retroman79 (2026-07-07 16:50:52+00:00): Hi. What's wrong with the waypoint I put for Ratkova Cave? I personally visited the site and marked it there, describing in detail how to get there and find the cave.
soliMM (2026-07-07 17:41:49+00:00): Hi, not sure what you mean, my changeset description is quite clear and you can check history of element for more details. 

But since you asked, I have fixed name tag which was 'Раткова пещера', considering word 'пещера' is foreign word it has no place in name tag in Montenegro.
AlexSpritze (2025-09-15 07:40:26+00:00): Hi Andy,
bitte bei dem Feld "Name" keine beschreibenden Begriffe, wie Gehweg oder Bushaltestelle eintragen. Ich habe das aus deinen Änderungen hier wieder entfernt:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171950094
ggefen (2025-09-24 19:19:12+00:00): הלכתי שם בעצמי והיה שביל. לא מסומן אבל בהחלט ברור שהולכים שם. בבקשה לא למחוק כי זה מאפשר לאנשים להשתמש בסימונים כאלו כדי לדעת שאפשר בוודאות שאפשר ללכת שם וכדי לתכנן מסלולים.
בקיצור, תשקיע אנרגיה בלסמן שבילים שיעזרו לאנשים לטייל במקום למחוק שבילים שאנשים הלכו בהם וסימנו אותם. 
שנה טובה
hatul (2025-09-25 07:34:12+00:00): גם אני הלכתי שם השנה ולא היה שביל. הנחל עביר בקלות אבל בלי שביל.
המיפוי צריך להיות לשביל שמסומן איכשהו (סמש, שילוט, רוג׳ומים) או שברור בשטח.
אני מסמן המון שבילים כשהם קיימים, אבל אין טעם לסמן במפה שביל שלא קיים, ורק יבלבל מטיילים.

שנה טובה גם לך
Gregory Peony (2025-09-14 19:52:16+00:00): Hi, this is overall a good cahngeset, but the arrow head shaped building in the NW is likely just a rectangular building and just looks that way becasue the imagery was taken at an angle. see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Roof_modelling#Typical_errors_in_the_interpretation_of_roof_geometry_from_aerial_images for an illustration. Condsider this possibility when you want to map a building with an arrowhead footprint. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171932949
eggie (2025-09-14 19:46:15+00:00): Dag E... Lijkt me correct zo.
Mapse
Beau Jonckers (2025-09-16 11:37:55+00:00): Hallo Le TopographeFou, könnten Sie sicherstellen, dass Ihre kartierte Wiese sich nicht mit den bereits eingezeichneten (genauer kartierten) anderen Wiesen überschneidet ? Vielen Dank im Voraus.

Hallo Le TopographeFou, Could you make sure that your mapped meadow does not overlap the already drawn (more accurately mapped) others meadows. Thanks in advance.
Beau Jonckers (2025-10-06 19:12:25+00:00): Do you want me to change it ? Could you respond.
BCNorwich (2025-09-16 06:33:15+00:00): Hi, Several highway sections of the park run were placed on top of existing highways. This made duplication of highways that could cause disruption of routing. I've removed the duplicate sections and amended the route relation to suit.

Regards Bernard
ieuanj (2025-09-17 09:56:04+00:00): Thanks Bernard!  Appreciated 🙏
Gregory Peony (2025-09-14 20:13:08+00:00): Hi, you appropriately moved the highway to prevent data overlaps and make the relative position of features more accurate. 

The vast majority of footprints here represent individual footprints, but two in the South with complex shapes envelope two buildings each; pay attentetion to shadows, roof colours, and access to buildings to know where one building ends and another begins.  

Good job modifying the existing building to make room for adding one visible in imagery, though the SW footprint is still longer than the building is in reality. 

Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
eggie (2025-09-14 19:38:48+00:00): Hoi .. Lijkt me oke als dat C12 bord aan beide kanten staat.
bicycle en foot=yes is default op wegen, maar kwaad kan het natuurlijk niet.

Die forward en backward zal ergens vandaan komen. Inconsistente bebording.
Het waren tags uit 2023 van dvdhoven.
Je zou het hem kunnen vragen.
Mapse,
eggie
eggie (2025-09-14 19:43:05+00:00): Hoi,
Je vraagt feedback.. 
Wanneer een naam niet officieel is uitgegeven, maar wel wordt gebruikt door de 'lokalen' dan kun je beter loc_name=......   taggen.

MVG
eggie
Gregory Peony (2025-09-14 23:03:51+00:00): Hi, you generally identified buildings visible in imagery and correctly tagged and squared the vast majority of them, however some are not as accurate as the imagery allows e.g. the footprints in the North, and a significant ammount share common nodes when it looks like they shouldn't e.g. the footprints in the South becasue a shadow is visible between the roofs. Consider that you are looking at the roofs of buidlings but mapping their footprints; unless you have reason to believe that buildings share a common wall, please map them seperately.

You ended up adding duplicate footprints in the East. Save your contributions every 5-15 minutes to reduce the likelihood of this and to preserve your work in case of a technical error. (I resolved the duplicated footprints in Changeset: 171939780).

The three footprints in the SE represent one building who's roof has multiple colours. 

Please do not connect the corners of buildings to other buildings or features such as highways or residential areas. In the iD Editor, hold down the `Alt` key to prevent your cursor from snapping to existing data and accidentally creating shared(grey) nodes. This [video about connected nodes](https://youtu.be/ltn1VOiq5_0) has more information and a guide.

Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
Gregory Peony (2025-09-14 20:25:22+00:00): Good job modifying the exisitng footprints here rather than deleting and remapping. You may want to map footprints slightly smaller than the roof you see to give yourself a buffer for the change in shape that occurs during squaring. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171934087
Zrop (2025-09-14 20:23:07+00:00): Hallo biketeur,
auch hier hast Du wieder Gebäude von “building=terrace” in “building=house” umgetaggt. Einige der Gebäude sind aber keine Einfamilienhäuser sondern Mehrfamilienhäuser.
Was ist Deine Quelle ?

Gruß Zrop
NorthCrab_upload (2025-09-14 20:01:09+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13143241998

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
kamasytrix (2025-09-14 20:11:29+00:00): ахаха, серьезно? такого немає, це народна назва ларків на трасі
kamasytrix (2025-09-14 20:18:07+00:00): https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1Krraq8iNo/
Myazyk (2025-09-14 20:29:45+00:00): Не всі назви є офіційними. Народні назви теж наносяться на карту
kamasytrix (2025-09-14 21:01:44+00:00): так це не району назва, а назва ларьків
SomeoneElse2 (2025-09-14 19:56:55+00:00): Yes it has!
ngry_pazuzu (2025-11-07 05:06:11+00:00): Your edits on Westminster Highway make it looks like there is a second unpaved segregated cycle path on each side that is physically segregated from the roadway, in addition to the bike lane on the right shoulder of the paved roadway. I have removed or corrected those edits.
NIHELper (2025-10-18 20:03:32+00:00): Hi, mind you, some of parkings added by you are superfluous e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1429805699/history/1 or https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1429805663/history#map=19/53.245993/45.012876 . I mean, there are already TAGS (parking:right=lane, parking:right:orientation=perpendicular) on the roads which your parkings are next to; they are NOT mapped as separate WAYS. 

You should either edit those tags as parking:right=SEPARATE or delete your parkings mapped as ways.



Привет, некоторые из отмечанных тобой парковок дуплицируют информацию, которая уже есть на карте в виде тэгов на дорогах, которые расположены рядом с этими парковками (ссылки выше). Нужно или изменить тэги этих дорог или удалить добавленные тобою парковки
Gregory Peony (2025-09-14 20:48:00+00:00): All footprints you mapped here represent buildings. You improved the accuracy of an existing footprint; well done. When appropriate, please remember to square footprints after moving their nodes. Thank you for your contribution. 
Resolved by;
Changeset: 171936379
Changeset: 171936486

If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
NorthCrab_upload (2025-09-14 20:30:59+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.

"Łukasiewicza":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13143260645

"Osiedle Zielone Łąki":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13143260646
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13143260647
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13143260648
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13143260649
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13143260650

"Langiewicza":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13143260652
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13143260653

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
dadavid (2025-09-15 08:44:23+00:00): Was ist an dieser Straße falsch, die hier entfernt wurde? 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/509599179
Kommandant FFWPH (2025-09-23 15:42:39+00:00): Die "Straße" ist keine Straße, sondern ein Privatgrundstück.
VBZ Balmer (2025-10-01 08:17:36+00:00): Ende März wurde von uns die gesamte VBZ Tram-Gleisgeometrie inklusiv Tramweichen mit Hilfe amtlicher Vermessung bis auf 30 cm genau angepasst. (Siehe Änderungssatz 164111061 von VBZDistel). Das korrekte Mappen unserer Infrastruktur ist essentiell und besitzt viele Folgebeziehungen. Durch deine Änderungen ist zum Beispiel das Routing unserer Fahrwege zum Teil nicht mehr möglich, da Gleise und Weichen falsch verschoben und zusammengehängt wurden (Siehe Kreuzung Stauffacherstrasse/Badenerstrasse). Da wir gesehen haben, dass in deinem Änderungssatz vom 14.09.25 viele Daten, die uns als VBZ betreffen, verändert wurden, würden wir gerne ein rollback machen. Uns würde auch interessieren, weshalb du die Gleisgeometrie und die Position der Weichen verändert hast oder anders gefragt, was du mit "Datenprobleme Zürich" meinst? Gib uns doch Bescheid und teile uns mit, ob du mit einem rollback des erwähnten Änderungssatzes einverstanden bist.
Kovoschiz (2025-09-15 09:19:48+00:00): Please don't add `office=` to `landuse=` or `building=` , which refers to the sites and buildings. There can be other offices inside.  Create a new point for the businesses themselves.