piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2024-03-01 08:53:44+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback   Tip... Bestaat het pad nog en is het verboden toegang.? Dan svp niet verwijderen, maar taggen met access=no. Is het ontoegankelijk gemaakt dmv boomstammen en takken dan taggen met als disused:highway=path
Dan zie je het niet meer op de kaart en voorkomt opnieuw intekenen door medemappers.  

Verwijderen doen we pas als het pad in het landschap is opgegaan. Graag reactie.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-03-01 08:58:15+00:00): Zie ook https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/hoe-kan-natuurmonumenten-het-beste-omgaan-met-ongewenste-paden/93583?page=2
喵耳引力波 (2024-03-01 10:08:37+00:00): 我说你这个地主老财有点不要脸嗷，这山上算是扬的一点不剩了？

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/496320976/history

这七年前的好水好路现在是一夜之间断流了？
NM$L (2024-03-01 10:24:22+00:00): 乐
woodpeck (2024-03-01 10:40:44+00:00): Is this related to https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15757 ?
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2024-03-01 12:03:32+00:00): @woodpeck

Yes, 博股通金 is alt-account of 南昌地主, because he was block for 0 hour and he want to prove he is right, so he use the new account map unreansonable track.

And he was pointed out by many mappers in group chat this afternoon, maybe he feel angry and wanting to ruin everything.

Thank you for this quickly action!
woodpeck (2024-03-26 08:20:25+00:00): 南昌地主 has written to DWG apologizing for their actions and promised to be better in the future. I have unblocked that account now; should this lead to further issues, please write to DWG again.
habi (2024-03-01 08:53:08+00:00): Löschung landete fehlerhaft in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148086313
d_berger (2024-03-01 14:49:38+00:00): Wurde seltsamerweise erst vor wenigen Tagen neu eingetragen. "Alt" kann es allerdings nicht sein, da man Gleis 1 erst kürzlich entfernt hat. Ohne aktualisierte Luftbilder oder AV-Daten wird's schwierig.
CasperGeo (2024-06-25 09:25:22+00:00): Make sure not to connect buildings nodes together. Mostly they are individual buildings.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148086656
Frans S (2024-03-01 09:56:05+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148086934
Bobbi123 (2024-03-13 16:23:03+00:00): Hallo milet, nach deiner Änderung ist die Situation dort nun falsch dargestellt. Denn bei diesem Gebäude hat man zwar auch einen Innenhof aber dieser fängt im Gegensatz zu den anderen erst über dem Erdgeschoss an - das EG geht hier also über die komplette Gebäudekontur.

Korrekt wäre hier also, dass das gesamte Gebäude flächig als Gebäude eingezeichnet ist (ohne inner/outer) und der Innenhof z.B. nur mit vier Linien in Rechtecksform dargestellt ist. Damit würde man erkennen, dass das Gebäude auf ganzer Fläche überbaut ist und innen trotzdem noch ein Innenhof über dem Erdgeschoss ist.
milet (2024-03-13 20:01:47+00:00): Ja, ich hab jetzt auch gesehen, dass das auch schon im letzten Changeset angemerkt wurde. Ich habe im aufgemachten Hinweis geantwortet.
tekim (2024-03-01 15:30:05+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM.  Just a small suggestion, when highways and footways cross, they should share a node at the intersection (unless of course one is on a bridge or in a tunnel - which isn't the case here)
vladislav471yakovlev (2024-03-01 15:52:18+00:00): Hello, tekim! Thanks for your comment, I added the intersection point :)
Kovoschiz (2024-03-01 11:27:04+00:00): It should be `level=-3` , but you should not add that to `route=light_rail` etc when they don't have such a concept. It's only refers to physical structures and functions on them.
remychou (2024-03-01 11:31:25+00:00): gotcha ! will update :-)
MichS (2024-03-01 10:57:39+00:00): Wie sieht denn die Änderung vor Ort aus? Die Wanderwegrelationen sind nun unterbrochen.
Wie ist die Kennzeichnung vor Ort auf das vermeintliche Verbot der Wegebenutzung?
Schilder? Absperrungen?
Beachten Sie, dass Ihre Änderungen jederzeit Rückgängig gemacht werden können oder von Leuten neu eingezeichnet werden können, die von dieser Diskussion nichts wissen.
Es gibt Taggingmethoden um private Wege zu kennzeichnen.

MFG
Nakaner (2024-03-01 11:31:24+00:00): Hallo,

dass eine Fläche in Privatbesitz ist, begründet kein Betretungsverbot, da in der freien Landschaft nach § 59 BNatschG i.V.m. § 44 LNatschG bzw. im Wald § 37 LWaldG ein Betretungsrecht für die Allgemeinheit existiert. Sperren sind durch die Untere Naturschutzbehörde/Untere Forstbehörde genehmigungspflichtig. Ich werde bei der zuständigen Behörde nach dem Vorhandensein einer Sperrgenehmigung fragen und bis dahin die Löschungen vorläufig rückgängig machen.

Viele Grüße

Michael
Kr Schwarzwald (2024-03-01 13:09:58+00:00): Hallo,
Michael,
die beiden unteren Wanderwege führen tatsächlich in eine Sackgasse, Schilder mit Hinweis auf Privatgrundstück werden noch aufgestellt, sollte es dennoch keine Beachtung finden wird ein Tor und Zaun aufgebaut werden müssen. Der obere Rundweg führt an dem Wiesenstück vorbei (nicht darüber) durch den auch privaten Wald, kann aber begangen werden. Schilder hat diesbzgl. der Schwarzwaldverein bereits aufgestellt udn die Wanderwegbeschriftung geändert. Der Vorstand der Schwarzwaldvereins ist unterrichtet und hat die Änderung der Eigentümer bestätigt. Der Wanderweg war nur geduldet und kein eingetragenes Wegerecht.
Trotzdem viel Spaß beim Wandern, nach wie vor besteht die Möglichkeit  mit einem kleinen Umweg die schöne Natur dort zu genießen.
Viele Grüße aus dem Schwarzwald.
Kr Schwarzwald (2024-03-01 13:21:08+00:00): Lieber Michael,  das steht Dir natürlich frei.
Deine § beziehen sich auf Wälder, nicht auf Wiesen.
der Weg über die Behörden steht Dir natürlich frei, kein Problem, bitte nachfragen.
Die Begehung der Waldflächen gem. den genannten Gesetzen ist weiterhin möglich, der Wanderweg am Haus vorbei und über landwirtschaftl. Flächen am und ums Haus hingengegen nicht mehr.
Das ist auch notariell und kaufvertraglich abgesichert.
Bei Zuwiderhandlungen gilt §123 StGBG, der dann auch zur Anwendung kommt, sobald die Beschilderung steht.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen
nevw (2024-03-01 13:16:30+00:00): Hi, I see you have resolved many. There are only 8 more left to do. Tks.
Frans S (2024-03-01 09:55:30+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. A remark. Try to be more accurate by following the rooflines.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148088414
cartomatto (2024-03-04 10:04:08+00:00): hai cancellato la nota fixme all'idrante, ma siamo sicuri che ci sia un idrante nel bel mezzo di un bosco?
Frans S (2024-03-01 10:08:45+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Sloppy mapped.
Buildings not squared


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148088481
Frans S (2024-03-01 10:07:45+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 
Please do not include a shadow into your mapping

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148088569
Frans S (2024-03-01 10:06:40+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Oversize buildings mapped.
Collecting several buildings . mapped as  1.
Not accurate mapped



Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148088651
Frans S (2024-03-01 10:04:55+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 
Please follow the extensions as well when you map a roof line

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148088666
Frans S (2024-03-01 10:02:14+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 
Pleased stay within the rooflines and do not include the shadow.
Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148088667
Frans S (2024-03-01 10:00:51+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
A few buildings not accurate mapped. (extensions)
Non Squared buildings


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148088668
plennert (2024-03-08 13:31:06+00:00): Hallo accoda,
bitte jede Firma nur 1x erfassen. Jeden Vertreter einzeln entspricht nicht ganz dem wofür osm gedacht ist. Könnt Ihr daher eure Kontaktdaten wieder entfernen?
totera (2024-04-19 23:20:29+00:00): Ciao Gabriele, per i parcheggi che hai aggiunto il tag parking=surface non è corretto, sono lane o street_side: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:parking
gippiesse (2024-04-24 20:25:01+00:00): Ti ringrazio. Allora per adesso li lascio così, in modo da farne oggetto di lezione con i ragazzi della terza media di Monte San Vito, il 4 Maggio 2024, in occasione della conferenza LibreItalia.
Frans S (2024-03-01 12:45:28+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Inaccurate mapped (Buildings with extensions just mapped as a rectangular building.
Oversize buildings
Not all buildings squared


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148089224
Ewen Hill (2024-03-02 02:39:39+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM - This a appears to be a private driveway and the driveway should be set to access=private if you could do this please.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148089319
Frans S (2024-03-24 16:13:58+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Inaccurate mapped.
Buildings not squared.
Connected nodes of buildings to other buildings
Quality prevails above Quality.



Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148089338
eggie (2024-03-01 10:37:37+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback  Het is niet de bedoeling als een pad of weg voor  onderhoud is deze te verwijderen van de kaart. Het tunnelgedeelte stond al enetjes op access=no  Het zal dus niet routeren.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-03-01 10:41:15+00:00): reverted by changeset #148090582

Ik heb je actie weer teruggedraaid. Wanneer je nog vragen hebt stel ze gerust.
MVG
eggie
Ewen Hill (2024-03-02 02:40:19+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM - This a appears to be a private driveway and the driveway should be set to access=private if you could do this please.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148089653
Frans S (2024-03-01 12:27:49+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Inaccurate mapped.
Buildings not squared.
Connected nodes to other buildings.

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148089723
Frans S (2024-03-01 12:38:37+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Buildings not squared.
Oversize mapped
Included shadow in mappings


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148089952
Frans S (2024-03-01 12:02:01+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148090125
Frans S (2024-03-01 11:24:48+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 

Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
inaccurate mapped. (Not follows the rooflines at complex buildings.
Include the shadow in your mapping


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148090132
Frans S (2024-03-01 11:36:36+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Buildings not squared ( Most of your uploaded changesets.)
Please do not upload each single building but collect them till you are finished with a task.


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148090185
chris66 (2024-03-20 08:25:42+00:00): Hi,
official_name:de halte ich nicht für korrekt, da die DE Bundesregierung kein Bestimmungsrecht für die Deutsche Sprache hat. Diese wird ja nicht nur in DE sondern auch zB in Österreich und der Schweiz gesprochen.
Frans S (2024-03-01 11:58:13+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Inaccurate mapped. Not square buildings


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148090227
Frans S (2024-03-01 11:34:04+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 
Please stay within the rooflines and don't include the shadow into your mapping

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148090309
map per (2025-04-06 17:15:20+00:00): Hallo townlion,

diese Fußweg Brücke (1) gibt es anscheinend gar nicht (vgl. https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4699037). Ich hab sie deshalb wieder gelöscht.

Viele Grüße
map per

(1) https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1256523398/history
Frans S (2024-03-01 11:32:06+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. However, not all builddings squared.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148090415