piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Hufkratzer (2023-11-14 21:47:58+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1223337119 is obviously not a racecourse, see https://www.facebook.com/KonjickiKlubClassic/ ; it should be tagged differently, see:
- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a#Riding_centre_(equestrian)
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/856426537
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset (similar problem)
mgerken (2023-11-15 23:45:14+00:00): Looks good to me. I also tagged the whole street as tertiary now as it just ended in the middle and improved the accuracy in the town.
Do you know if the cyclepath is really mandatory in Kirchlinteln?
Janni K (2023-11-15 23:55:49+00:00): Use of cycling paths is optional in town (you may use the roads), but mandatory between the villages. That's for the main roads. I don't know for the tertiary roads, but will check.
archpdx (2023-11-14 02:10:10+00:00): Hi,
Please don't add unsigned route numbers to ref=*, instead unsigned_ref=* should be used:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:unsigned_ref
CurlingMan13 (2024-10-24 01:04:47+00:00): User vandalized here.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143990420
archpdx (2023-11-14 02:10:30+00:00): Hi,
Please don't add unsigned route numbers to ref=*, instead unsigned_ref=* should be used:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:unsigned_ref
Road–Runner (2024-04-08 21:52:54+00:00): Das ist nur der Stall der Falbesoner Alm und keine Schutzhütte.
Matt_ (2023-11-14 01:23:54+00:00): Please see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/US_National_Inventory_of_Dams
iandees (2023-11-22 21:30:32+00:00): Reverted because a node was dragged accidentally

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144343935
Udarian (2023-11-14 04:32:50+00:00): I have a few notes here, first, next time please try and keep the geographic area down, this could have been done as 6 ish separate smaller commits and it would have made it easier to review/understand. 
second of all, what is your source for the deletion of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1178243253, I ask because it is there on the latest imagery (National Agriculture Imagery Program, and Miami-Dade County Orthoimagery (Latest)). 
Next, for way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1081964592 why did you remove the bicycle=yes, does that mean that bicycle's aren't allowed because then it should be tagged as bicycle=no, otherwise why remove the tag?
last of all on several ways (such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1036045604) you put bicycle=Not Specified, I could not find any previous uses of this value (see https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/bicycle#values), what does it mean, shouldn't a more standard tag be used(like possibly permissive), the point I'm trying to make here is that, from my understanding of the tagging in this commit, "yes" seems to get across the same information as "Not Specified" unless there are signs specifying that bicycles aren't allowed on those sidewalks, and if it is that way bicycle=no would be more appropriate from how I see it. Just because there isnt a sign explicitly allowing bicyclists doesn't imply that they aren't allowed on that sidewalk at all, honestly from how I see it it would be the other way, unless otherwise specified you can bike on sidewalks. and generally the use of non standard tagging in cases were there really isnt a good reason to do so is usually not a vary good idea, tagging changes need to be approved through a community vote on the wiki. 
otherwise, happy mapping.
Udarian (2023-11-16 21:12:52+00:00): please respond, it would be nice to get those clarifications.
Udarian (2023-11-26 05:18:41+00:00): again, can you please respond, my biggest worry is that the deletion of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1178243253 is incorrect and I would like to figure this out ASAP.
Udarian (2023-11-26 05:23:00+00:00): also that removed way is also on the "Esri World Imagery" Ariel imagery and several others so unless this has changed over the last year I doubt that  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1178243253 is no longer there
Udarian (2023-11-27 06:24:20+00:00): again, it would be wonderfull if you could please elaborate on why you removed way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1178243253.
Udarian (2023-11-30 05:06:26+00:00): can you please respond as to weather or not you saw with your own eyes that 
 way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1178243253 was demolished just over a year after it was built and since the latest satellite imagery was taken roughly 7 months ago based on my estimates.
Udarian (2023-11-30 22:05:10+00:00): I tried contacting you through this commit multiple times and you have been unresponsive. I have to assume the removal of way 1178243253 was a mistake because it can be seen on several of the satellite imagery available in iD and the Bing street side also available in iD. I also reverted the bicycle=Not Specified because it is non standard and from what I can tell from taginfo what you added is the only occurrences globally. this tag from what I can tell adds nothing since unless otherwise specified it is implied that bicycles are allowed to use sidewalks (or any other pedestrian use) so bicycle=Not Specified and bicycle=yes would mean the same thing and bicycle=yes is standard.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144641870
Kovoschiz (2023-11-14 15:29:56+00:00): `building:flats=` is for the entire building, not per floor.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-11-16 10:00:43+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11347671354/history - note that images from SC notes are not kept long term and should not be put into image tags
chriswhy (2023-11-16 17:34:52+00:00): Ah, thanks! That's good to know.
Road–Runner (2024-04-08 21:57:51+00:00): Die Kapelle in Milders existiert nicht, außerdem heißt diese sicher nicht "Kapelle", das ist nämlich ein Eigenname.

Auch zahlreiche anderen Einträge weisen eine mangelnde Qualität auf oder existieren nicht. 
Ich würde dich wirklich bitten, mehr Sorgfalt walten zu lassen bei deinen Bearbeitungen.
Kuper11 (2024-04-09 05:39:55+00:00): Füge sie wieder ein, die ist neu und steht da
Peter Muret (2024-08-11 22:07:45+00:00): Es stimmt schon, die Kapelle in Milders wurde neu gebaut. Ich habe sie aber auch noch mit dem Zusatz "Anbetungsstätte" versehen und rechteckig gemacht. Das wären so Verbesserungen, die gefehlt haben aber sonst passt alles.
Road–Runner (2024-10-08 16:54:17+00:00): Okay Entschuldigung, dann war ich zu voreilig im Falle der Kapelle.
woodpeck (2023-11-14 23:31:34+00:00): Hallo KuprianP, bitte gib im Changeset-Kommentar beim Hochladen einen Text ein, der kurz Deine Änderung beschreibt. "local" ist keine gute Beschreibung.
Filip009 (2023-11-14 10:12:52+00:00): Pre wikipedia linky sa používa wikipedia tag. Do website ide skorej link na nejakú stránku pamiatky mimo wikipedie. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikipedia

Obrázky z wikipedie majú tiež svoje vlastné tagovanie. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikimedia%20commons

Bolo by to prerobiť, pretože keď je tam website aj wikipedia tag, tak sa potom jedná o duplicitu.
zstadler (2023-11-14 19:29:24+00:00): Hello HopOn,

Thank you for trying to fix some of the recent vandalism in this and previous edits!

The revert of the vandalism in Israel is still on-going. Please avoid performing local manual fixes, as they complicate the global reverts.

For example, in this edit 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1120406737/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15337322/history 
and 4 other nodes were deleted rather than reverted to their pre-vandalism status.

You are welcome to join the other mappers in Israel OSM Telegram channel at https://t.me/OSM_Israel (mostly in Hebrew)
GerdP (2023-11-20 16:51:53+00:00): Moin aus Wildeshausen!
Ich wundere mich gerade über die Positionen der Bäume. Dieser hier https://www.osm.org/node/11347874695 ist aus meiner Sicht deutlich zu weit von der Straße entfernt. Oder sind die importierten Positionen zuverlässig und damit die Luftbilder verzerrt?
Schramme (2023-11-20 19:23:24+00:00): Hi, ich hab das während des Gassigang gemappt. Hab's noch etwas verschoben und den Entwässerungsgraben hinzugefügt. Importiert aus z.B. dem Baumkataster der Gemeinde ist es nicht. Händisch aufgenommen.
GerdP (2023-11-20 19:51:49+00:00): Ah, okay, danke. Wenn Du dort mal wieder vor Ort bist, dann könntest Du vielleicht mal nach dieser Stelle schauen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2481123597
Da kreuzen sich angeblich zwei Bäche. Ich denke, der Teil im Osten ist falsch.
Schramme (2023-11-20 20:03:47+00:00): Wird erledigt. Der Hund wird sich freuen. Die Koppeln stehen unter Wasser ;)
Schramme (2023-11-21 12:16:36+00:00): Erledigt. Rasteder Bäke hab ich als Entwässerungsgraben getaggt. Geestrandtief ist ein Bach.
GerdP (2023-11-21 14:24:51+00:00): Was mich eigentlich irritiert hat war die Richtung der Wasserläufe. Dieser https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/134239410
läuft durch den Bach?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/311271972
gscholz (2023-11-16 10:04:03+00:00): Hi sbelemey,
there are still a lot of overlapping sections, look at all the warnings this changeset lists above.

OSM inspector even gives a better impression of all those errors:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=16.59371&lat=41.19439&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges

Kind regards
Guido



https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=143996823
sbelemey (2023-11-30 11:41:19+00:00): Hello, Guido!
Thanks for your comment. Yes, we will check and fix this overlapping a little bit later. 

Best regards, 
sbelemey
TrickyFoxy (2024-09-02 18:24:09+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156111792
CurlingMan13 (2023-11-14 23:16:31+00:00): As mentioned previously,  Please use more detailed changeset comments to explain what you did. You can read more here:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_change
eggie (2023-11-14 08:21:26+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback  Svp geen adresgegevens op gebouwomtrekken plaatsen. Er is een adresnode. Ik pas even wat aan. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
dzidek23 (2023-11-15 17:34:03+00:00): Hi,
Are you sure you wanted to remove all the buildings, roads and POIs?
the people (2023-11-25 17:54:25+00:00): Yes since im jus gonna remake em
dzidek23 (2023-11-26 16:57:10+00:00): That's great, however, at first glance it looks like a vandalism. If you intend to fix something, try to do it in one go, or at least piece by piece. 

One thing worth nothing is that buildings are not just outlines. There could be plenty of tags useful to others and difficult to recover once an area is deleted. e.g. Tesco's building has all of those tags associated:

addr:city=Peterborough
addr:housename=The Werrington Centre
addr:postcode=PE4 6NA
addr:street=Staniland Way
branch=Peterborough Werrington Superstore
brand=Tesco
brand:wikidata=Q487494
brand:wikipedia=en:Tesco
building=yes
check_date:opening_hours=2021-11-13
contact:website=https://www.tesco.com/store-locator/peterborough/the-werrington-centre
fhrs:id=247147
name=Tesco
opening_hours=Mo-Sa 07:00-23:00; Su 10:00-16:00
operator=Tesco Stores Ltd
shop=supermarket

I was struggling with the concept of OSM being a database, more than a map, for quite some time. We see a map with building, streets and paths; others use the data that's not normally rendered in the browser:
e.g: https://openaedmap.org/#map=3/47.74/-8
It is worth checking what information an object already has before it is removed, someone my need it in the future.

You will notice I reverted some of the deleted futures, added some detail and information.
infeeeee (2023-11-16 14:29:59+00:00): Szia!

Más hírek szerint nem véglegesen zárt be: https://telex.hu/gazdasag/2023/11/14/bige-laszlo-csanyi-mutragya-petfurdoi-nitrogenmuvek

Az ilyen end_date-ek szoktak fent felejtődni elemeken, aztán majd 6 év múlva nézi valaki, hogy ez meg mint jelenthetett. Garantálom, arról nem lesz újsághír, ha újraindult. Ha majd kirúgták az embereket és meg is szűnt a cég biztosan, majd akkor elég lesz jelölni, addig is a "Don't map temporary features" szabályt kéne alkalmazni erre az esetre: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_map_temporary_events_and_temporary_features
infeeeee (2023-11-16 14:30:43+00:00): Közben láttam a következő changesetben leszedted, tárgytalan, bocsi!
Reathan (2023-11-14 10:58:06+00:00): Hi Chris.

I changed the fairways to farmland as when i try to import the area into blender, blender does not recognise fairway.

so i will need to change it back to farm land and once ive done the import ill revert it back to fairways :)
CurlingMan13 (2023-11-25 06:31:25+00:00): have you reverted this?  temporary changes for your game/renderer is not allowed.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-11-14 08:12:32+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2190074686
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/497735236

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
habi (2023-11-14 08:05:45+00:00): GWR: http://qa.poole.ch/addresses/GWR/2325.osm.zip :)
LockOnGuy (2023-11-17 13:06:14+00:00): Thank you for noticing this! this is a 6+ year old error! Keep up the great work! Thank you again and best regards!
little_maper (2023-11-19 08:34:59+00:00): Thank you for your kind words.
eggie (2023-11-14 10:10:03+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback... Wanneer staat aangegeven fietsen verboden dan is het correct, maar wellicht als het niet de bedoeling is dat je er fietst dan is highway=footway een betere tagging.
incline=  0% voegt hier niets toe in ons vakke landje.



MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
jeslop (2023-11-14 09:15:44+00:00): Hola Tolemia.

Los nombres no van en mayúsculas.
Por favor, corrígelo.

Saludos

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
jeslop (2023-11-14 09:17:11+00:00): Por cierto, tampoco olvides esto: 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenos_comentarios_en_conjuntos_de_cambios
NorthCrab_upload (2023-11-14 09:00:49+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/402891192

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
WieKo68 (2024-06-11 04:25:03+00:00): poprawione
Filip009 (2023-11-14 19:18:59+00:00): Zasa mnoho bodov. Takáto poľná/trávnatá cesta sa väčšinou značí ako highway=track. Opravené.
impiaaa (2023-11-14 18:06:16+00:00): Please use the changeset description to describe what you changed and why. For example, "Added traffic light to intersection." See more examples here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Filip009 (2023-11-14 19:16:10+00:00): Fakt odporúčam vyskúšať ten Vespucci. Takto si dal na jednu rovnú cestu 12 bodov, ktoré tam boli zbytočné. Už som ich vymazal.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-26 08:56:36+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11348047884/history

What you tried to map here?
user_11609320 (2023-11-14 09:10:27+00:00): when it is overlaid over another polygon, it slows my computer too much
Filip009 (2023-11-14 19:06:30+00:00): Bolo by lepšie keby si pridal o aký obchod sa jedná. shop=yes je príliš všeobecné. Pokiaľ sú to nejaké malé potraviny použi shop=convenience.
Filip009 (2023-11-14 19:12:57+00:00): Je pravda, že tu bola trocha chyba v preklade. Už som to opravil, pri najbližšej aktualizácií by to malo byť lepšie.
silversurfer83 (2023-11-14 12:21:38+00:00): Gude :)

du hast darum gebeten, dass sich jemand diese Änderung anschaut. Ich tu das mal.

Die Information, dass hier eine Fahrschule ist, ist schonmal inhaltlich korrekt erfasst. Ich habe jedoch zwei Anmerkungen, die auch ein bisschen ins Allgemeine gehen:
- POIs wie Geschäfte, Büros, Behörden,... sollten besser als eigener Punkt an der Stelle erfasst werden, wo sich ungefähr der Schwerpunkt befindet (hier wäre das also innerhalb des Gebäudes) um die Daten des POI und des eigentlich Gebäude drumherum sauber getrennt zu haben. So kann zB auch ein "start_date=*" erfasst werden, was bei Gebäuden das Baujahr, bei einer Fahrschule aber der Tag der Eröffnung an dieser Stelle wäre. Lässt sich schlecht trennen, wenn alles auf dem Gebäudeumriss erfasst ist.

- Dann ist da deine Quelle: meinestadt.de. Es ist gut, dass du eine Quelle angibst. Die Quelle selbst ist leider nicht für OSM geeignet, siehe folgender Abschitt der ABG von meinestadt.de:

"10. Keine kommerzielle Nutzung des Services"

Nutzer von meinestadt.de dürfen die von meinestadt.de bereitgestellten Services oder Teile davon, ihre Benutzung oder den Zugang zu den Services nicht kopieren, vervielfältigen, nachahmen, verkaufen, weiterverkaufen oder für kommerzielle Zwecke welcher Art auch immer nutzen, soweit es Ihnen nicht ausdrücklich von meinestadt.de in schriftlicher Form gestattet wurde. "

OSM nutzt als eigene Lizenz die ODbL (https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence). Da müssen wir immer sehr drauf achten, dass wir passende Quellen nutzen. Selbst geguckt ist immer die Beste Quelle :)


Bei Fragen, immer raus damit
silversurfer83
Leitstelle Kassel 1 (2023-11-14 12:55:41+00:00): Hallo. Vielen Danke. Ich habe es geändert. Ist das so ok?
HellMap (2023-11-14 10:19:32+00:00): Hi,

When deleting ways, please make sure there are no routes/relations that get broken with this. Several bicycle routes and hiking routes were routed through the old crossing and sidewalk, so they all got broken.

I have fixed them and rerouted through the bridge.

It's also a good idea to leave ways that are clearly visible on the aerial as `was:highway=xxx`, so that someone else does not accidentally draw them again. I have added that for the old crossing - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1223413784
Peremenov (2023-11-14 11:08:39+00:00): The bike route has been moved to the different crossing and re-routed over the bridge
HellMap (2023-11-14 11:23:59+00:00): The bike route that you moved was only the name on the foot/cycleways "Centrs - Mežaparks". This isn't a route relation. The relations I'm talking about are:

E9 - City Centre - Vecāķi  https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10016280

Piejūras ceļš https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11803322

Svētā Jēkaba ceļš https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12304214

EuroVelo 13 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2769637#map=8/56.987/22.741&layers=N

I rerouted them over the bridge. This is more complicated to do, which is why I mentioned this for the future reference.

P. S. This is not part of the issue, but I also created and properly set up the Centrs - Mežaparks route/relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16695367 . That's how local cycling routes are normally supposed to be done.
Jakka (2023-11-14 15:36:55+00:00): Met access=private was voldoende onnodig alles op private te zetten ;)
Kovoschiz (2023-11-14 15:33:42+00:00): 1. `access=residents` is not widely supported. `=private` is understood to be this. It's not very needed to add `private=residents` , and it has a collision with `ownership=private` . 
2.  `barrier=door` should either be `door=` or `barrier=gate` .
tom_yorados (2023-11-14 19:55:51+00:00): an welche Stelle genau hast du da was geändert?
https://osmcha.org/changesets/144002504/

Grüße
Langlaeufer (2023-11-14 11:06:07+00:00): Schau mal hier:
https://www.google.de/maps/@52.694707,9.480888,3a,75y,274.51h,80.51t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1skDYCQWwFkadyW2MFFVcgAA!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fpanoid%3DkDYCQWwFkadyW2MFFVcgAA%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D146.01836%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144002516
Langlaeufer (2023-11-14 11:07:00+00:00): Ah sorry, du hast ja einen neuen Weg mit 30er Zone eingezeichnet.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144002516
OSM_RogerWilco (2023-11-14 12:24:13+00:00): Ich habe den Weg geteilt, wo die 30-Zone endet. Ich habe nicht geprüft, welches Stück die ID bekommen hat.
OSM_RogerWilco (2023-11-14 12:26:39+00:00): Leider geht da JOSM nach der Anzahl Punkte und nicht nach der Länge. Schade. Schöner wäre es gewesen, wenn das längere östliche Stück die ID/History behalten hätte.
eggie (2023-11-14 10:13:22+00:00): Na alle jaren weer een bijdrage, maar nooit de welkomstmail ontvangen.. Bij deze alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback Tip Je zou ook het vlak in kunnen tekenen met de erfnaam 
met landuse=farmyard 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dfarmyard

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Nawfal85 (2023-11-14 13:56:31+00:00): السلام عليكم
ليس شرطا ً ان تكون هذه المسارات طريقاً واحدا مدمجاً اذا ما علمنا ان نهايات هذه المسارات تنتهي بأستدارة او دوار ولا بأس ان يكون مسار الذهاب منفصل عن مسار الاياب ...
تحياتنا الى أم الدنيا
Nawfal85 (2023-11-14 14:05:21+00:00): https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=144002960
little_maper (2023-11-15 09:08:57+00:00): شكرا Nawfal85
لقد قمت فقط بدمج الطرق لان البيانات الموجوده بداخلها موحده ولا تحتاج الي  فصل الطريق
تحياتي
moje_konto (2023-11-21 23:47:23+00:00): Odcinanie mini fragmentów ulic na granicy i usuwanie z nich nazwy - nie wydaje się dobrym rozwiązaniem.

Dyskusja na forum:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/ciecie-ulic-do-granicy-miasta-mini-kawalki-bez-nazwy/106190
aTarom (2023-11-14 19:49:56+00:00): Hi, thanks for editing, a question please, the user who gives the feedback, where does it come from? I'm not saying it's wrong because I don't know yet, I'm just curious if I had to ask the source.
Cheers
AmyCupcake (2023-11-14 21:29:26+00:00): The Townhall says neither name is correct and the name should be simply Santa Maria (without an accent)
https://www.vilanova.cat/participacio/descripcio_dels_barris
AmyCupcake (2023-11-14 21:31:02+00:00): info thanks to https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/yopaseopor
Vika_Nosovich (2023-11-15 13:35:19+00:00): Hello! Thank you for your comments! I find it difficult to answer where user from. If you have up-to-date information  about neighbourhood name, feel free to correct it. Thank you for your contribution to OpenStreetMap!
Best regards,
Vika.
AmyCupcake (2023-11-15 13:51:47+00:00): Washing your hands of an issue that you broke is bad etiquette, but I have fixed it for you in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144052525#map=16/41.2162/1.6823

Names in the Catalan Countries (Catalonia, Valencia, Balearics) are contentious, and changing Maria to María is Castillian (the language of the Spanish interior commonly called Spanish), Not Catalan.
b-unicycling (2024-02-05 14:48:52+00:00): I was very pleased to find this mapped and walked it today, but I found it a bit misleading, because the hiking trail leaves out some of the very interesting sites like the Roman baths and the cart ruts. Would it maybe have been better to map it as a relation type=site rather than suggesting a hiking path that misses so much? It would probably also a good idea to add the inscriptions of the information board to OSM, since some of the physical ones are already very hard do read.
I've captured mapillary imagery while walking it, maybe that will be useful.
fx99 (2024-02-05 15:18:06+00:00): I just mapped the part of the trail that I could figure out from th signs. If the Roman bath are part of the trail, the way there should be added to the route. The website cited in the route can also be helpful if read while walking there.
Rogoyski (2023-11-24 19:52:41+00:00): Taka nazwa to już zdecydowanie jest do odfiltrowania :)
NorthCrab (2023-11-24 21:27:34+00:00): Coś ten GPT od pewnego czasu coraz niższej jakości się robi. Nie tylko na tym projekcie to zauważyłem.
eggie (2023-11-14 11:13:41+00:00): Dag BrwT

Best lastig.. een schuin genomen luchtfoto zet je op het verkeerde been als je naar de dakvorm kijkt.
De westzijde dus weer uitgelijnd conform de BGT/BAG
De oostzijde was oke.. Wel even nog uitgelijnd. 

MVG
eggie