piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
LordGarySugar (2025-08-20 00:07:52+00:00): Why would I put a comment on a changeset that is nothing to do with me or the concerns I have?
buy_osmand (2025-08-20 00:16:05+00:00): Correct, you have made your decline to the invitation publicly known. Good day.

I'm just minding my own business to earn my 11oz of silver ☺
https://ministryofhealth.substack.com/p/43-the-currency-of-the-redeemed-living
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-01-17 13:53:18+00:00): Hello,
The name that you have added to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/526623997/history looks like the personal name of someone who lives there.  If that is the case, please don't do that - see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mapping_private_information .
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
user_5359 (2025-08-16 07:24:28+00:00): Welcome to OSM! 

Please note that objects without descriptions are useless if they only have a name. Changes should also be made in a smaller, manageable area.
rempshaener (2025-08-17 20:35:28+00:00): Hallo,
die Nennweite wird ohne Einheit (mm) eingetragen.
Viele Grüße
nevw (2025-08-16 07:34:27+00:00): Hi, I reverted this because it is already mapped acurately
nevw (2025-08-16 07:36:03+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/975288222#map=16/-33.85097/151.28450
user_5359 (2025-08-16 07:24:44+00:00): Hello! Please notice the difference between a name of a street and addr:street (part of the adresse).
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-08-16 16:33:13+00:00): I am well aware of the difference. Many roads have short cul-de-sacs with no name but have the same address as the road they're branching off of, hence why I tagged these as highway=pipestem and addr:street=(road that it branches off of).
❤️‍🔥 (2025-08-16 07:47:17+00:00): shouldn't these be merged with the existing boundary lines? now there are two lines on top of each other
lcmortensen (2025-08-16 09:48:17+00:00): Ah, yes. Just haven't got around to doing the cleanup yet.
❤️‍🔥 (2025-08-16 09:58:17+00:00): okay, another point worth discussing is whether all the tags should go on the relation or the node. 

I would suggest the relation, because that would help Template:Maplink on wikipedia. So the node would be left with just `place=*` and `name:*=*`. It's also what the australians do

what do you think?
❤️‍🔥 (2025-08-16 10:08:07+00:00): another problem is that this will cause 100,000+ validator warnings because StatsNZ and LINZ don't agree on suburb boundaries - compare SA3 (https://data.linz.govt.nz/layer/113764 ) with https://data.linz.govt.nz/layer/113764 at places like Milldale or Devonport

so this means `addr:suburb` won't match the enclosing `place=suburb` boundary. Also worth discussing, I feel like if we're going to import boundaries from a new dataset, there should be a plan to resolve this inconsistency for addresses....

.....but we can't use SA3 for addresses because we don't have an ODbL license waiver from Stats NZ who've changed their license from CC 3.0 to CC 4.0
❤️‍🔥 (2025-08-16 10:09:01+00:00): oops wrong link, should be https://datafinder.stats.govt.nz/layer/111235 and https://data.linz.govt.nz/layer/113764
lcmortensen (2025-08-16 20:37:13+00:00): Okay, so I won't import any more SA3 boundaries. That was just a trial for suburb boundaries, so are only in parts of Napier and Palmerston North at the moments. Going foward, we may use LINZ boundaries for suburbs.
lcmortensen (2025-08-17 01:09:31+00:00): I've paused all uploads until the issue is sorted. Juts would like to comment that we've been using Stats NZ boundaries for the regional councils, territorial authorities and Auckland local boards for over 10 years (since at least December 2014) without issue. Not sure if LINZ has this data...
catgirlseraid (2025-08-17 06:03:47+00:00): I'm not sure if you saw my earlier message but i'll try get a waiver from Stats NZ for OSM. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170543166
❤️‍🔥 (2025-08-19 10:14:56+00:00): in terms of next steps, I would suggest writing a detailed proposal based on the advice here:  https://osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines so that the issues above can be discussed in detail
dcskobuffs (2025-08-28 15:50:37+00:00): 
Hello chiideeraa1,

I saw you reclassified a stretch of Lekki-Epe Expressway to motorway. According to OSM Policy, motorways "generally resemble a controlled-access road and are free from intersection controls" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmotorway). There are many at grade intersections along here such as at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/294869777 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1396560430. With that said, how would you feel about reclassifying this stretch to primary from https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2262046497 to https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5437396618 and trunk from https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7736649234 to https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2262046730?

Thank you and looking forward to hearing from you.
eggie (2025-08-16 08:27:05+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  Je hebt nu een aantal wegen verwijderd. Zijn die wegen er niet meer?

Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=170511083
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Bobdevries (2025-08-16 08:34:48+00:00): Hi! Thanks voor de info!

Inderdaad, een aantal wegen in dit gebied lopen iets anders. En die wil ik helemaal goed intekenen :)
Bobdevries (2025-08-16 08:37:42+00:00): Zie dat het wel even duurt voordat de edits definitef worden. Maar hopelijk is die snel weer compleet.

Bij waze, googlemaps en applemaps was ik ook al druk beziggeweest. 
Merk dat ik het steeds leuker begin te vinden!
eggie (2025-08-16 08:40:51+00:00): Oke....  Even CTRL-F5 toetsen.. Soms een paar keer.
Dan maak je je cache leeg.
Wanneer wegen die er niet meer zijn, maar nog wel herkenbaar zijn op de luchtfoto, kun je ze beter taggen met disused:highway=residential. Dat voorkomt opnieuw intekenen.

Op de luchtfoto zie ik inderdaad nog wegen.
Kun je daar echt niet meer komen.

Probeer even CTRL-F5 . dan zie je wat je hebt gedaan.
Mapse,
eggie
Jordi MF (2025-08-17 13:48:42+00:00): Hola Agustin,

En la siguiente web tenemos los diferentes tipos de barreras que podemos añadir en OSM. ¿Podrías indicar cuál es la que más se parece?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:barrier
Agustin (2025-08-17 18:00:50+00:00): Barrier:bar
Johnbo (2025-11-25 18:01:38+00:00): Hola.

¿Tienes alguna fuente que diga que a la tercera fase del Bulevar se le ha puesto ese nombre? No encuentro nada al respecto en prensa ni en la web del ayuntamiento.
user_5359 (2025-08-17 19:12:57+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/13073811895 (one of nintes-two trees). What ist the mean of the tag "ref "= "18-127"?
What is the correct ref value 18-96 or  18-127 ?
Amul (2025-08-18 08:34:30+00:00): it would seem as if I have copied `ref =18-127` over. GoMap didn't show me this faulty tag. can we fix all these, by removing the `ref ` tag?
user_5359 (2025-08-18 19:18:09+00:00): Done! You are welcome!
NorthCrab_upload (2025-08-16 08:50:57+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Potok":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13073834220
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1113332700
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1422605226

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Wulf4096 (2025-10-24 07:27:28+00:00): Moin, woher Stammen die Daten/Positionen von den Hydranten?
Le Petit Léo (2026-04-08 03:52:51+00:00): Bonjour, vous avez fait un doublon en ajoutant ce radar de vitesse car il existe déjà un peu plus loin (et à sa place réelle) : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1294298597/history.
Merci de le supprimer.
Bonne cartographie.
mcliquid (2025-08-19 14:40:11+00:00): Hi and thank you for your contribution!

Please note for the future: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
trial (2025-08-16 20:57:56+00:00): Bonjour, merci, mais autant conserver l'ancien nom dans old_name.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-24 17:34:07+00:00): reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410  and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969  remain not answered

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173729027
eggie (2025-08-16 10:02:19+00:00): Dag Fedde. De tag leisure=park heb ik overgezet met naam naar een vlak. 
park taggen we niet op een node.

MVG
eggie
Fedde89 (2025-08-16 12:18:19+00:00): Hallo Eggie, 
Dank voor de feedback en het corrigeren. Via OsmAnd is het geloof ik standaard een node, maar zal dat voortaan via hier doen.
Mvg, Fedde
eggie (2025-08-16 12:34:46+00:00): Top...  denk dat osmand meer iets is voor onderweg..
Mapse
eggie
joost schouppe (2025-09-04 07:24:15+00:00): Are the shops in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/202856780 reachable from an indoor corridor? If not, then this should likely not get a shop=mall tag
Fizzie-DWG (2025-10-23 06:27:19+00:00): DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173657220
eggie (2025-08-16 09:47:11+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
gscscnd (2025-08-17 07:22:03+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history
jcr83 (2025-08-25 19:41:01+00:00): Bonjour Lenny,
La bonne pratique dans OSM pour l'intégration des adresses est de mettre le numéro à la limite public/privé, typiquement sur le portail d'entrée (là où se trouve la plaque portant le numéro), et non au milieu des maisons.
Il faut donc que tu déplaces chaque point d'adresse lors de l'intégration.
Jean-Claude
GanKonMalade (2025-08-25 20:04:38+00:00): Oui c’est ce que j’essaie dorénavant .
Mais des fois c’est pas clair.. je vois pas la maison explicitement ciblé par le point de la BAN. Et du coup que faire dans ces cas là?
Supprimer le point au risque de supprimer une info partiellement utile? Ou laisser le point même si il est pas exactement au bon endroit ?
jcr83 (2025-08-25 20:11:28+00:00): Non, bien sûr il ne faut pas supprimer le point. Idéalement, il faut aller voir sur le terrain, ou alors utiliser l'imagerie de rue (Panoramax/Mapillary) si disponible. Si pas possible, laisse le point où il est.
PierZen (2025-08-21 15:39:12+00:00): To help communities to review, your changesets should cover more local edits, not the world at once.
Friendly_Ghost (2025-08-21 17:13:36+00:00): I gave up on that concept. Anyway, we have good review tools like better-osm-org, OSMcha and OSM changeset visualiser, so this shouldn't be much of a problem. 

I also discussed this already with the broader community on the forum and people seemed to approve of it, so if you have something to add to that discussion, please do.
RafaBoski (2025-08-18 10:51:24+00:00): Od 15 grudnia br. będą czynne, ale nie mogłem się już doczekać, więc ustawiłem je wcześniej ;)
A stację we Wręczycy zaktualizowałem do dzisiejszego stanu
zuicz (2025-09-13 10:07:25+00:00): cierpliwości, jeszcze trzy miesiące, na razie muszą pobyć jako disused ;)
SpinOff (2025-08-19 21:23:24+00:00): Highway class and highway surface are different things. The line with highway=residential was correct, because it is used to reach the 93C building. I corrected it.
BCNorwich (2025-08-16 11:59:19+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The AED needs to be more precisely positioned for folk to find it from an OSM map. OSM data can be correct to within 1 metre. The Big Yellow storage facility is the other side of Holman Road from this AED placement. I would think it would be fixed to the wall. Could you please reposition the AED? I can help if you tell me exactly where it should be.

Regards Bernard.
eggie (2025-08-16 11:26:26+00:00): Hi Djekfhsn.

Please use the present addressnode.. No space in postcodeformat.

Greetz,
eggie
Map_HeRo (2025-11-06 19:03:41+00:00): Hallo Nordpfeil, 

Du hast hier einen Node ohne Attribute mit dem Namen "Tient, General Purpose, Small" und dem CS-Kommentar "Add" gemappt. 

Kannst Du mir verraten, was das für ein Objekt sein soll und was der Kommentar "Add" aussagen soll?

Danke und Gruß Mikke
Nordpfeil (2025-11-08 08:28:55+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis, ist mir wohl untergeschnitten. Ich kümmere mich drum, das  US-Army-Zelt noch richtig zu taggen
Map_HeRo (2025-11-08 11:40:33+00:00): Das wäre gut, und dann bitte auch das name-tag entfernen, das es sich bei der Beschreibung definitiv nicht um einen Eigennamen handelt.
Nordpfeil (2025-11-08 16:51:08+00:00): Ist erledigt und dazu noch ein paar andere Dinge ergänzt
gscscnd (2025-08-17 07:03:43+00:00): Ogólnie droga nie powinna współdzielić węzłów z parkingiem (to niezależne obiekty, nie łączymy ich też dla rutingu), chyba że faktycznie granica parkingu biegnie środkiem drogi.

Dla parkingu przydałyby się jeszcze tagi parking, surface, ewentualnie inne:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=parking
gscscnd (2025-08-17 07:00:37+00:00): Jeśli SMUDA nie jest skrótowcem, to na OSM preferowana byłaby wersja Smuda. Polskie cudzysłowy: „”. Ewentualnie do korekty operator na parkingu.
elesmod (2025-08-17 12:16:19+00:00): Ależ mnie drażni taka niekonsekwencja w nazewnictwie własnej firmy - na dachu sklepu: FIRMA SMUDA, na tabliczce przy wejściu: SKLEP FIRMOWY "SMUDA", na Facebooku: Firma Odzieżowa Smuda. I bądź tu mądry :-/ Nie wiem czy SMUDA to skrótowiec. Chyba nie jest to też nazwisko, gdyż w bazie REGON widnieje: FIRMA SMUDA SPÓŁKA CYWILNA KAMIŃSKA MIROSŁAWA, FILEC ANNA. Poprawka: to jednak od nazwiska, gdyż w tej samej bazie REGON można znaleźć wykreślony wpis: FIRMA ODZIEŻOWA - SMUDA SMUDA DANUTA. Czyli na OSM zostajemy przy wersji Smuda. Pytanie czy Sklep firmowy, Firma czy Firma Odzieżowa... eh...
gscscnd (2025-08-17 12:45:36+00:00): IMHO ten obiekt to prawdopodobnie bardziej „sklep firmowy” niż „firma”; można też taki opisowy przedrostek pominąć (ogólnie zazwyczaj się je pomija, po prostu name=„Sklep firmowy Nazwa Własna” jest mniej drażniące niż generyczne name=„Ławka” dla ławki) i pozostawić samo „Smuda” (w cudzysłowach lub luzem).
HellMap (2025-08-24 17:44:02+00:00): You added a fence here instead of what I assume is a driveway. This breaks routing for the road and footway that are now crossing a fence, so please be more careful.
richlv (2025-08-25 12:21:06+00:00): Three examples:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1422634342
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1422634343
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1422634349
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-08-16 17:06:55+00:00): skąd przekonanie że highway=trunk wynika z wysokich parametrów technicznych ?
Yog Sot (2025-08-16 17:37:22+00:00): zmiana do wycofania ze względu na złamanie zasady wprowadzania zmian z konta innego niz włąsciwe bez wskazania przyczyny utworzenia innego konta.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-08-16 17:48:27+00:00): Wycofane w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170533379 - między innymi za brak dyskusji na forum przed zmianą istotnej drogi, braku podania sensownej przyczyny oraz dość ewidentne używanie dodatkowego konta (nie jestem w stanie uwierzyć by kwestia tagowania highway=trunk budziła zainteresowanie kogoś kto w OSM nigdy nie edytował...)
Derojss (2026-07-13 14:36:06+00:00): 6281947802916 call/whatsapp
eggie (2025-08-16 15:49:16+00:00): Hoi,
Geen idee of het kan met organicmaps. Je zou die identieke adresnodes het beste kunnen samenvoegen met de BAG adresnode.

Met editor iD en/of JOSM kan het in ieder geval wel. 
MVG
eggie
A67-A67 (2025-08-16 13:40:54+00:00): Welkom op Openstreetmap,

Je lijkt snelheidscamera's en normale verkeerscamera's door elkaar te halen. De twee camera's die je heb verwijderd waren verkeerscamera's, geen snelheidscamera's. De snelheidscamera's op de Wippolderlaan zijn inderdaad verdwenen en waren al eerder uit Openstreetmap gehaald.

Op foto's van mei 2025 zie ik beide verkeerscamera's nog staan: 
- https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=52.0148302&lng=4.3060329&z=17&dateFrom=2025-02-01&pKey=4007814682825252&focus=photo
- https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=52.01017529999996&lng=4.290230199999996&z=18.50950161129297&dateFrom=2025-02-01&pKey=711002141331587&focus=photo&x=0.6017441521167616&y=0.4742378589191534&zoom=0.5501618122977346
A67-A67 (2025-08-16 13:45:07+00:00): Ik heb de verkeerscamera's hersteld en de nieuwe snelheidscamera aan de Dorpsstraat aangepast van verkeerscamera naar snelheidscamera voor 50 km/h.
eggie (2025-08-16 15:34:26+00:00): Welkom per PB verstuurd.
René1966 (2025-08-18 05:44:17+00:00): A67-A67 - dank je wel en excuus voor de verwarring
Aim311_ (2025-08-17 07:24:57+00:00): Cześć. Widzę, że dodałeś tag survey mógłbyś poprawić obszar wokół tego obiektu https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/575276966 ? Bo 1. nie wygląda na budynek, 2. brak ogrodzenia i obszaru przemysłowego (dodanego kilka lat temu). Na zdjęciach widać tylko pola, drogę dojazdową i ogrodzony mały obszar przemysłowy, prawdopodobnie wiertnię. Dzięki, pozdrawiam.
db-ak (2025-08-17 07:36:26+00:00): Tak, jest tam odwiert, kilka lat temu ładnie się palił. Geometria jest nieaktualna ale nie podchodziłam tą drogą serwisową. Mogę to poprawić z orto
db-ak (2025-08-17 08:32:16+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170553742#map=15/52.50801/16.67700
Zaktualizowałem ale nie mam pewności jak takie plomby po odwiercie tagować, możesz spojrzeć, coś zasugerować, a w njagorszym przypadku wycofamy
Aim311_ (2025-08-17 19:41:32+00:00): Fajnie poprawiłeś, wygląda dobrze. Zabezpieczony szyb zmapowałbym z pomocą https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made=borehole
rempshaener (2025-08-17 20:10:40+00:00): Hallo,
Umfang und Text lassen auf einen nicht abgestimmten Import schließen.
Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines bzw. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct
Grundsätzlich wäre das bei diesem Umfang kein Problem; wenn ich aber sehe, wie weit die tatsächlichen Positionen von den OSM-Daten abweichen oder dass bestehende Daten unglücklich angepasst wurden (www.openstreetmap.org/node/6329738953), möchte ich doch einmal nachfragen, was der Hintergrund deiner Anpassungen ist.
Viele Grüße
ffunk (2025-08-18 12:04:57+00:00): Hi,
die Anpassung haben ich auf Grundlage der Daten (Hydrantenpläne) vorgenommen die bei uns in der Feuerwehr vorliegen um die Hydranten im Einsatz auf der OpenFireMap angezeigt zu bekommen.

Sollte die Datenqualität nicht ausreichen kann ich die Einträge auch wieder entfernen.
rempshaener (2025-08-18 20:46:40+00:00): Hallo,
danke für die Antwort.
Ich würde vom Löschen gerne absehen.
Bei den paar Hydranten sollte es doch sicher möglich sein,
a) per Luftbild die Positionen zu verfeinern,
b) die grundsätzliche Existenz zu kontrollieren und 
c) bei der Gelegenheit weitere Daten zu ergänzen?
Viele Grüße
ffunk (2025-08-19 14:11:15+00:00): Hallo, klar das ist möglich und auch geplant. Im Zuge von Aus- und Fortbildung sowie anlässlich der Erstellung von Einsatzkonzepten. Da wir jedoch rein ehrenamtlich organisiert sind war es wichtig zunächst Daten überhaupt im Feld verfügbar zu haben :)
ziomio (2025-08-16 12:26:24+00:00): https://www.gazzettadiparma.it/parma/2025/08/16/gallery/via-ximenes-in-arrivo-unaltra-rotatoria-la-quarta-allincrocio-con-strada-budellungo-886036/
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-04 04:45:22+00:00): Hello!

You used
bicycle=no|
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1422628843/history

Have you maybe meant
bicycle=no
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
JochenB (2026-02-06 15:32:15+00:00): Thank you for you advice, yes it is a mistake, I changed the ways.

Usualy you can use the "|" for tagging different values on different lanes of a road, but this doasn't fit here.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-10 12:51:22+00:00): thanks for a fix! BTW, this foot=no directly next to campsite seems weird, but I seen weirded access rules
JochenB (2026-02-10 17:16:46+00:00): There were signs prohibiting access for pedestrians and bicycles. The intention was, that the area was for staff only, but the signs prohibited everything.
Yog Sot (2025-08-16 16:29:40+00:00): is thet the direction for cars?
because road markings specify otherwise.
Ma_sza (2025-08-17 22:08:41+00:00): Yes, this is the direction for cars. Road markings changed this last week so your info might be outdated. This was long-awaited by the local community change in traffic management.
Ma_sza (2025-08-17 22:09:31+00:00): *last week
Yog Sot (2025-08-18 07:34:58+00:00): okey, possibly  be more descriptive next time as to when the change was introduced to avoid confussion while you're still new and somewhat unexperienced mapper
Ma_sza (2025-08-18 11:46:00+00:00): got it!
mueschel (2025-08-18 08:50:41+00:00): Hi,
please don't use the "name:XX" tags to add transliterations and duplicates of the name of a village in 195 (!) different languages. The tag should be used only if there is an actual name in this language.
OsmChico (2025-09-01 07:50:07+00:00): Review: Passed
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170522832
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-08-17 10:38:05+00:00): Hi!

I am not sure these should be tagged as cycleways. These are footways that can accomodate bicycles at low speed, being verry narrow. Most park footways accept bicycle access in Quebec, but they shouuld be mapped as highway=footway with bicycle=yes or bicycle=dismount when narrow when there is no bicycle pictogram or sign. Those in particular don't even have lowered curb so most people without a mountain bike will have to dismount to cross the sidewalk. Thanks!
elkodr (2025-08-17 12:02:13+00:00): Thanks for your message .
In different mapping services for cyclists, if the path is marked at a footpath only, it will not give you the option to use it, thus why I changed a number of them in NDG since they are meant to be used for both.
At the same time, you are right about some not having access curbs so I'll review and make the appropriate edits. Thank you.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-08-17 12:30:26+00:00): Can you tell us which routing engine(s) are failing to use footway with bicycle=yes paths? because it should be able to route on them and you will get messages from other users saying "this is mapping for the router". Komoot and OSRM (the ones I know well) are indeed routing through any path with bicycle=yes tag or bicycle=dismount (though at walking speed).
user_5359 (2025-08-17 19:02:08+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12635506454 (one of five hundret thirty-one nodes). What is the mean of the tag
nagari = Guguak Tabek Sarojo ?

Short note: for the keys 
ref:kemendagri_kabkot = 13.06
ref:kemendagri_kec = 13.06.05
ref:kemendagri_prov = 13
If ref:kemendagri_kabkot is the first part of ref:kemendagri_kec and ref:kemendagri_prov is also the first part of ref:kemendagri_kabkot and
ref:kemendagri_kec, then ref:kemendagri_kec would suffice, because the other two can be calculated, right? For better assignability, it would be interesting to add the country code, i.e. ref:ID:kemendagri_kec.