piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Daham (2026-03-29 08:31:42+00:00): Kannst selber ja ein Schild aufhängen :-)
Jeder kennt diesen Platz nur unter dem Namen, ein anderer ist nicht gebräuchlich - somit ist der Platz eindeutig identifiziert. Wenn im Neunkirchener Kindergarten die Ansage kommt, zum Ebersbacher Bolzplatz zu wandern, bedarf es keiner weiteren Beschreibung.
Einer Diskussion bedarf es eher, ob der von Womped geänderte Platz wirklich genauso rechtwinklig ist, seine Oberfläche genauso abgegrenzt ist, wo die Basketball- und Picknickfläche jetzt ist usw. 
Das vorherige eher generische Tagging war mit seiner Unschärfe nicht das schlechteste...
SpinOff (2026-03-28 20:53:34+00:00): Hej. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
stasiu512 (2026-03-28 19:15:13+00:00): + maxspeed
SpinOff (2026-03-28 20:52:43+00:00): Hej. Coś tu nie pykło, bo teraz ścieżka przechodzi przez autostradę A1: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1043716972
Krzysztof Skiba (2026-03-28 21:12:40+00:00): czy naniesiona moja zmiana zostala juz zaakceptowana? czy mozna ja cofnac?
SpinOff (2026-03-29 19:35:21+00:00): Zmiany pojawiają się natychmiast. Przywróciłem te tory do poprzedniego stanu i przy okazji wywaliłem je z obszaru gdzie teraz jest A1.
eggie (2026-03-29 09:19:03+00:00): Hoi,

Lijkt me okay.. Als er nog meer nieuwe adressen zijn dan kun je die beter laten importeren via het forum.
De vorm van het gebouw heb ik aangepast.
https://viewer.satellietdataportaal.nl/@52.08698,5.096650,19/?datastrip=20260316_SVNEO-04&sensorname=SuperView-NEO

MVG
eggie
Joske1020 (2026-03-29 20:13:13+00:00): je hebt de relation van het ryckeveldebos overhoop gehaald. Ik weet niet wat je wou doen, maar zo te zien iets met het damage control center? zou het oké zijn dat ik je aanpassingen terugdraai en het zelf verwijder? en vanwaar heb je die info dat het center is opgeheven?
SustainableMobile (2026-03-30 22:26:59+00:00): Dag Joske
Het was niet zozeer de bedoeling het helemaal op te heven (ik ben nog wat nieuw hier) maar wel het hele terrein zoals militair domein aan te duiden cfr https://www.google.com/search?sca_esv=2eb1beb0bd5e5e34&rlz=1C1GCEA_enBE1139BE1139&sxsrf=ANbL-n7JLmwEqex1GO1QiCMxvlG1mZcDfw:1774909404010&udm=2&fbs=ADc_l-aJPaNUgmyF6N6eJt5nMLWwePQO1r9vTOIHYuaMLa3xuwsf2ALiJ-SVfUURqWoEQeCzcH3OlsLK876FVp-I6jIMx4Th5upW9SqvW8fPdZe-Uj4vCjEwrXv3i4gGrEx4L2soXDOXI70-y_ZDXMERfrfLOHF3BsgLL2-rw6HVHcQT0eeXp695VkdeA2xNctBEe6PUIBh3&q=ryckevelde+afgesloten&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiChqPk1MiTAxWXVKQEHa_LGw8QtKgLegQIFBAB&biw=2400&bih=1181&dpr=0.8#sv=CAMSVhoyKhBlLTU4MDluakxESjRfT0hNMg41ODA5bmpMREo0X09ITToOZUxUQUJTN3ctVFZ1ZE0gBCocCgZtb3NhaWMSEGUtNTgwOW5qTERKNF9PSE0YADABGAcg5Nnm-w5KCBABGAEgASgB
SustainableMobile (2026-03-30 22:28:08+00:00): De polygoon van het voormalige kleine stukje aanpassen lukte mij niet. Ik probeerde wel alle info over te nemen
NeisBot (2026-03-28 19:33:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/252046126 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Shop"
---
Zum Beispiel könnte eine neutralere und sachlichere Version deines Textes lauten: "Laden"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-04-05 22:33:07+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/180572372
NeisBot (2026-03-28 19:33:46+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13686955199 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Mechanical engineering factory"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-05 22:33:10+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180917915
(Delete spam tags. First version)
HurricaneGator (2026-04-08 19:22:15+00:00): Hello K1RB1L1TY,

I noticed you recently reclassified several ways from track to unclassified. I came across a few areas where some additional consistency updates, such as alignments and removing duplicate ways would help improve overall data accuracy.

This way (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1493688077) was created as unclassified, but it appears narrower than (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1474710013) and in my opinion would be more appropriately classified as a track. This unclassified way (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1493688075) duplicates a portion of (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/904327943), which could be extended northward instead, as the two are partially overlapping. Additionally this unclassified way (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/464431418) does not appear to correspond to a physical road northeast of (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13226523860), and it also duplicates the mapped road near (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2616348509). Lastly, It looks like (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1493688080) was created but not connected to (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1493688081), so it’s currently disconnected from the highway network.

Some of these discrepancies may be due to differences between aerial imagery sources. In this area, Mapbox Satellite imagery appears to be more up-to-date than Bing, so aligning edits with that source may help improve accuracy. I wanted to raise these data validation issues with you before any changes were made on my end. Let me know if you can review this area or if you would like others to make changes on the features you have recently edited.

Thank you for your time and happy mapping!
Norbert Dichter (2026-03-28 19:48:16+00:00): Hello, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. Thank you for your contribution. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. Or just hit the Q-key.
Also please keep in mind: many buildings are very close but do not actually touch each other, try to map them close to each other without letting them connect or share nodes with each other, roads, or residential area outlines. In the iD web editor, holding down the "alt" key will keep nodes from "snapping" to each other and accidentally connecting.  Thanks so much for your contribution, Norbert 'Nodi' Dichter, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180556605
Andrea Musuruane (2026-03-29 07:39:07+00:00): colour=darkblue???
NeisBot (2026-03-28 19:56:18+00:00): 🌍 Welcome to OSM, 刷餅_.
Thanks for contributing!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

✅ Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Updated restaurant and fast food amenities with new details, including takeaway and outdoor seating options"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment
SpinOff (2026-03-28 20:50:31+00:00): Hej.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
Srdjan023 (2026-03-28 20:34:07+00:00): Hi,

Mapping temporary infrastructure can often lead to "data rot" where the map becomes outdated the moment the project ends. Plus, if it’s just basic pipework, and it has nothing to do with trams (besides the fact that trams can't pass). Works will also be over in less than two months. https://www.bvk.rs/dodatno-produzenje-vremena-za-izvodjenje-radova-u-ruzveltovoj-ulici/
Srdjan023 (2026-03-28 20:34:39+00:00): Your changes have been reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180557988
NeisBot (2026-03-28 20:06:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/8495803967 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Medical spa"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisAgent (2026-03-28 23:33:44+00:00): 🕵 The changeset tags appear to reference Google as a data source.

Please note that using Google Maps, Google Street View, or similar Google services as a mapping source is not allowed in OpenStreetMap due to license restrictions.

More information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google

If the data in this changeset was derived from Google or another incompatible source, the edits may need to be reverted.

If this is a misunderstanding and the data was collected from permitted sources (e.g. local survey, Bing imagery, local knowledge, etc.), please clarify in a reply.
Hufkratzer (2026-03-30 19:41:21+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1493708110 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1493707863 do not look like horse riding centers ( leisure=horse_riding ), they look like horse riding arenas and in this case should be tagged with leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian , like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1290203171 , see also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a#Riding_centre_(equestrian) . In JOSM you can use the preset fpr sport=equestrian to tag them.
aseigo (2026-03-30 19:48:29+00:00): Ah, probably right! I've modified the ways. (Also: feel free to correct things you see ..)
Hufkratzer (2026-03-30 21:36:14+00:00): Thanks
Dimitar155 (2026-03-29 15:31:00+00:00): Моля не изтривайте данни, които видимо са верни и актуални.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180590091
NeisBot (2026-03-28 20:33:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13687086866 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Güzellik salonu"
---
Örneğin metnin daha nötr ve gerçek bir versiyonu şöyle olabilir: "Güzellik salonu"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-04-05 22:33:13+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/180558362
eggie (2026-03-28 21:09:13+00:00): 👍
iandees (2026-03-28 21:43:03+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9035101672 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180560301, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
iandees (2026-03-28 21:43:04+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11144715787 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180560303, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
aixbrick (2026-03-28 20:53:15+00:00): Fehler im Kommentar: Das "ohne" gehört da natürlich nicht hin. :-)
bartgron (2026-03-28 21:41:09+00:00): Zestaw zmian został wycofany - dodany obiekt nie istnieje.
Pozdrawiam
Autonomia Załęsk (2026-03-29 12:43:10+00:00): Punkt reprezentuje oficjalny Interfejs Logistyczny Autonomii Załęsk. Obiekt jest trwale związany z gruntem i posiada umocowanie prawne potwierdzone w Księdze Wieczystej nr [LU1W/00051421/9] (działka nr [418/2, obręb Mszanka]). Obiekt posiada nadany numer Wikidata [Q138820919] oraz operatora [Q138820761]. To jest punkt kontaktowy w ramach zarządu powierniczego, a nie błąd mapy. Rozumiemy dbałość moderatorów o zachowanie standardów, podkreślamy jednak, iż nasze działania mają oparcie prawne zarówno w prawie amerykańskim, jak i w relacjach z administracją RP. Dane są zgodne z zasadą 'ground truth', a lokalizacja została zweryfikowana pomiarem GPS w terenie. Upraszamy o przywrócenie punktu. Z poważaniem Zespół Kancelarii AUTONOMY OF ZALESK TRUST (Delaware [USA]
SpinOff (2026-03-29 19:25:17+00:00): W OSM nie ma miejsca na takie rzeczy. Z wikidata te bzdury też zaraz znikną.
Autonomia Załęsk (2026-03-29 21:02:14+00:00): Autonomia Załęsk jest inicjatywą, która została proklamowana 14 lipca 2021 roku i zapewnia ciągłość prawną Rzeczypospolitej. Trust AUTONOMY OF ZALESK TRUST pod prawem Delaware działa na jej rzecz. Autonomia Załęsk ma charakter neutralny, a wskazany na mapie punkt kontaktowy i punkt lokalizacyjny jest nieruchomością, która została objęta również ochroną w ramach Deklaracji ONZ o prawach ludności Rdzennej [https://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/documents/DRIPS_Polish.pdf]
Z przykrością odnotowujemy, że nie spotkało się to z należytym szacunkiem a wykazano za to brak profesjonalizmu w celu wyjaśnienia sprawy i arbitralne posunięcie o zamknięciu punktu. Pojawiające się i znikające komentarze i ich treści pod opisem sprawy wskazują tylko o  potwierdzeniu powyższych wskazań jak i świadczą o działaniach i postawie będącej w sprzeczności z duchem i inicjatywą [OSM] jako społeczności tworzącej w ramach zasad moralnych i partnerstwa.
grzegorz75jan (2026-03-29 21:13:42+00:00): "Pojawiające się i znikające komentarze"

Ciekawe rzeczy opowiadasz.
grzegorz75jan (2026-03-29 21:26:55+00:00): Przepraszam. Ktoś zapewne z administracji dość skutecznie usunął z widoku zestaw zmian 180560191 do którego pisałem wczoraj komentarz.

Popieram usunięcie edycji ponieważ bzdury należy usuwać.
NeisBot (2026-03-28 21:06:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13687204447 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Travel agency"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-05 22:33:15+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180917917
(Delete spam tags. First version)
Fraxi (2026-03-28 21:55:12+00:00): Hey, what are you doing? See https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1493717280/ The buildings should be separately drawn and usually with squared corners.
Dimitar155 (2026-03-29 15:48:23+00:00): Всички промени в района са върнати.

@nikitadavidov_crab Моля влагайте повече старание. Има такива хубави снимки, а Вие чертаете три сгради като една и нито една няма един прав ъгъл...

changeset/180590868
IvaKraljić (2026-03-28 21:34:53+00:00): The wrong tag has since been fixed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180559881. #OptimoRoute
Autonomia Załęsk (2026-03-29 00:00:16+00:00): Zawiadomienie o bezzasadnym wycofaniu danych logistycznych podmiotu AUTONOMY OF ZALESK TRUST.
Wycofanie edycji zestawu #180558786 jest działaniem błędnym, naruszającym integralność danych o podmiotach gospodarczo-powierniczych.
Oświadczam, że wskazany punkt pod współrzędnymi 51.319978, 23.569553 jest obiektem oficjalnie ustanowionym Punktem Kontaktu (Point of Contact / Delivery Point) oraz substratem majątkowym (Trust Property) podmiotu AUTONOMY OF ZALESK TRUST, operującego na prawie stanu Delaware [USA].
Punkt ten posiada unikalną identyfikację logistyczną (Kod: PLZA) oraz jest niezbędny dla procesów weryfikacji majątkowej beneficjentów Trustu w obrocie międzynarodowym. Status prawny podmiotu oraz lokalizacja jego jednostek terenowych są publicznie weryfikowalne na oficjalnej witrynie: autonomyofzalesk.org.
Upraszamy o niezwłoczne przywrócenie danych. Usuwanie zweryfikowanych punktów logistycznych posiadających własną infrastrukturę informatyczną i stronę www stoi w sprzeczności z zasadą mapowania obiektów istniejących w obrocie prawnym i faktycznym. Dalsze usuwanie tych danych będzie traktowane jako celowe wprowadzanie błędu w międzynarodowych systemach geolokalizacyjnych, co uderza w interesy beneficjentów Trustu.    
Z poważaniem 
Zespół Kancelarii AUTONOMY OF ZALESK TRUST

dano 03-28.2026 godzina 20:00 Delaware, [Stany Zjednoczone]
grzegorz75jan (2026-03-29 00:34:02+00:00): Że co ?
grzegorz75jan (2026-03-29 01:06:19+00:00): "operującego na prawie stanu Delaware [USA]" To operujcie sobie w USA jeśli wam pozwolą a nie w Polsce.

Ten punkt to możecie sobie wstawić np. w https://opengeofiction.net lub inne stosowne miejsce.

Profilaktycznie proszę nie wyskakiwać z jakimiś paragrafami, sądami itp. bo się przekręcę ze śmiechu.
bobthebuilder423468 (2026-03-30 02:14:01+00:00): thanks for fixing!
Bienson (2026-03-29 01:23:59+00:00): Non-connected Node at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13687270741/ still causing building-highway collisions - and you also unnecessarily changed the building to a multipolygon, where now the 4 individual outline ways are part of the site relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7258943/ instead of the building
Glassman (2026-03-29 22:48:20+00:00): I agree with you on the souther section of State Route 4 where it is a divided highway, but once it becomes a two lane road, shouldn't that stay something of a lower classification?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180561184
ScrawnyMeowth1 (2026-04-02 16:52:05+00:00): Gavin Gervais,

Can you please explain your reasoning for tagging this as a highway=trunk? Per the wiki, highway=trunk should be used for major non-motorway roads that connect regional population centers. This route just dead-ends in the 200 Area industrial area.
qgmzmy (2026-03-28 22:22:11+00:00): 呃呃磨碟沙还是少画了一节
eerib (2026-03-29 00:27:36+00:00): Hello Shinsplints,

It's very important that you be truthful in your changeset comment and not vandalize mountain bike trails with false information.

If you would like to dispute this revert of your edit then you can reach out to the Data Working Group, the moderation group of OpenStreetMap, by sending an email to the following email address.

data@openstreetmap.org

Yari na, eerib
Shinsplints (2026-03-29 15:01:30+00:00): Will do.
Shinsplints (2026-03-29 15:02:50+00:00): When did you hike it to refute this?
eerib (2026-03-29 16:36:25+00:00): Hello Shinsplints,

If you would like to dispute this revert of your edit then you can reach out to the Data Working Group, the moderation group of OpenStreetMap, by sending an email to the following email address.

data@openstreetmap.org

Bear in mind that the Data Working Group is well aware of your previous deceitful behaviour including submitting AI edited photographs. Continued attempts to misrepresent and vandalize OpenStreetMap may result in your editing privileges being removed.

Yari na, eerib
Shinsplints (2026-03-31 15:28:50+00:00): Hi  Eerib

There are now two people with local knowledge saying this trail is damaged. But OSM doesn’t seem to care about trail quality. Just quantity. 

So continue with your inaccuracy if you feel so strongly. It just undermines OSMs data.
eerib (2026-03-31 15:45:57+00:00): Hello Shinsplints,

The other user (boncnaa) you're referring to tried to delete the trail for the following rationale:

1. "an illegal trail on private land"
2. "it is an unsantioned trail that should not be on any map. It would be a shame for this trail to be found and ridden hard. This would take away the loam and beauty to this trail."
3. "The trail has been destroyed by the rain over the last few months making it impassible and dangerous."

This shifting rationale with each vandalism attempt, and the high likelihood that that account is a sockpuppet of another previously banned user, is warrant enough to disregard their vandalism.

You're welcome to take this up with the Data Working Group if you feel strongly about it.

data@openstreetmap.org

Yari na, eerib
alpacaMaps (2026-07-28 01:12:15+00:00): This changeset adds one or more surveillance cameras in a spot that looks unlikely — the nodes sit well away from any road, which usually means the cameras aren't physically present on the ground.

If these cameras are real, please let us know so the map stays accurate. Otherwise, we'd kindly ask that you avoid adding cameras that aren't actually there, and that you remove any temporary or test nodes once you're done.

If this was simply a mistake, no problem at all — just clean up the nodes that don't correspond to a real-world camera, and leave a quick note here so we can help.

Thanks for helping keep OpenStreetMap accurate.

— alpacaMaps
Star-y (2026-07-28 01:35:07+00:00): Not sure how this got added, may have been an accident. I’ll make sure I dont add cameras accidentally like this in the future. I apologize for the mistake
eerib (2026-03-29 00:15:15+00:00): Hello boncnaa,

Thank you for your edit. Unfortunately it does not meet OpenStreetMap standards and therefore has been reverted. Please refer to the following wiki page.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F

If you have further questions regarding the policies or trail mapping in general then I recommend starting a discussion thread on the OpenStreetMap Community Forum.

https://community.openstreetmap.org

If you would like to dispute this revert of your edit then you can reach out to the Data Working Group, the moderation group of OpenStreetMap, by sending an email to the following email address.

data@openstreetmap.org

Thank you, eerib
TrickyFoxy (2026-04-29 09:03:50+00:00): Маяк?
pwbriggs (2026-03-29 06:09:57+00:00): Aah! How did I miss those!? Thanks :)
Srdjan023 (2026-03-28 23:55:59+00:00): *Svetozara Miletića
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-09 06:12:52+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180758890
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-04-09 17:36:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 181109944 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious changes in Mallorca.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20118
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-04-09 17:36:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 181109944 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious changes in Mallorca.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20118
sommallorqui (2026-04-10 18:50:47+00:00): este barrio existe
SomeoneElse (2026-04-10 22:22:36+00:00): See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/betrunkene-near-mallorca/142877/34 for context; please add this back if it is correct.
sommallorqui (2026-04-10 18:51:06+00:00): santa eulari es un barrio de can picafort y no tendria que ser eliminado