piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:53:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 09:02:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
mavl (2025-12-02 16:07:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 175409468 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: vandalism - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19076].
fortera_au (2025-06-26 09:01:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:58:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:59:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:58:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:56:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:54:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
Bobropiton (2025-05-04 21:51:00+00:00): Абсолютно незачем добавлять отдельные сегменты дорог на попутные полосы. используйте теги change=* или change:lanes=* гайд тут: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:change

Пакет правок откатил.
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:59:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 09:00:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:56:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:53:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:55:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 09:00:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:58:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 09:02:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:57:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:53:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 09:00:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
FreddyFremad (2025-05-04 20:05:21+00:00): I created this place and all info is correct except for the gps location. The address i gave is the right location. It is close by.
Hov can I correct this?
Lostmonkey (2025-05-04 21:19:28+00:00): I moved it for you. Also changed it from a Sportscenter to a Club, seems more appropriate. Notice that in Denmark addresses are not supposed to be added to objects. The addresses are kept as separate nodes. Finally, I think you might want to reconsider using your email if it is a personal email-address.
FreddyFremad (2025-05-04 22:30:30+00:00): Thank you.
The mail belongs to the chairman and is on the website. So it is already public.
Ok Club then. But actually there are other activities in that place: Table tennis, dance, photo - and maybe some things I do not know of :-)
Lostmonkey (2025-05-05 06:37:17+00:00): Maybe that does qualify as a sports centre, although I personally would probably consider using amenity=community_centre instead considering those sort of activities. In any case, the individual club, like your bridge club, should also be added separately. Like it is now.
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:57:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 09:01:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:57:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
geoFT (2025-11-08 05:11:20+00:00): Moin,
Soweit ich weiß, ist dieser Abschnitt Anlieger frei für motorisierten Verkehr, für Radfahrer und Fußgänger aber frei nutzbar und relativ beliebt. Mit access=destination gilt das jedoch für alle. Wenn nichts dagegen spricht, würde ich das auf motor_vehicle=destination ändern, damit hier auch wieder Fahrradrouting drüber läuft statt über die weniger schöne Strecke westlich der Bahn.

Viele Grüße,
Florian
Ole Kröger (2025-11-16 15:53:29+00:00): Klar ergibt Sinn. Danke.
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:59:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 09:01:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:58:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 09:00:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:53:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 09:00:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:54:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
yrtimiD (2025-05-05 23:45:31+00:00): Hi Omer, if there is an only single building nearby, I'd add address to the building instead of creation of an address node
woodpeck_repair (2025-05-04 17:31:30+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 165222237, 165223884, 165225240, 165227247, 165227699, 165232130.
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:54:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
trial (2026-03-28 17:57:50+00:00): Bonjour, le programme s'appelle Safran, certes https://www.selogerneuf.com/annonces/neuf/programme/lorient-56/244047199/.
Par contre est-ce que ce nom figure sur le terrain ? Sur une source non libre, ça ne me semble pas être le cas.
Simus_Musicus (2026-04-01 12:28:32+00:00): Bonjour. Le nom est bien visible depuis la rue Beltrame, il y a une petite plaque fixée sur le mur.
Vous avez peut-être confondu avec le programme immobilier Safran situé à Lorient ? Celui sur lequel j'ai ajouté le tag "name=" se trouve à Chantepie.
trial (2026-04-01 12:59:56+00:00): Bien vu. J'avais bien cherché à Chantepie et vu que le lien comportait Lorient, je pensais à tort que c'était géré par Lorient mais bien à Chantepie.
Pour la plaque, vous parlez de  : https://www.google.com.tw/maps/@48.0916438,-1.6251666,3a,15y,120.14h,94.97t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sufHI2Iwa-t4mpDTy5ukdCg!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fcb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26pitch%3D-4.968759448937476%26panoid%3DufHI2Iwa-t4mpDTy5ukdCg%26yaw%3D120.14398597417427!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI2MDMyOS4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D (désolé, juste pour situer, pas pour cartographier) ?  C'est la seule trace que j'ai trouvé, ça me semble un peu léger. Le local technique Enedis du bâtiment est marqué Cœur de ville, les adresses .sur les pages blanches n'y font pas référence non plus, plus le nom d'un programme n'ayant pas vocation à rester.
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:57:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:53:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:59:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:54:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:54:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:59:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:56:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:59:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:57:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
cuzi (2025-05-07 12:33:30+00:00): Apagou uma estrada com essa alteração. Isso foi intencional ou deveria ser revertido?
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:54:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:56:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:55:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 09:01:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 09:00:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:56:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 09:00:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:55:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:59:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:56:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:57:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:57:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:54:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:55:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 09:00:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
crodthauser (2025-05-06 21:58:14+00:00): PM: Hallo crodthauser,

warum entfernst Du “traffic_calming=island” und ersetzt es mit “crossing:island=” + “traffic=” ?

“crossing:island=” + “traffic=” sind lediglich Subtags, die so keinen Sinn ergeben.

    “crossing:island” wird nur in Verbindung mit “highway=crossing” verwendet und gibt an, ob ein Fußgängerübergang eine Mittelinsel besitzt
    “traffic” wird auf “highway=*” verwendet um die Verkehrsdichte einer Straße zu beschrieben

Ob “traffic_calming=island” nur für Verkehrsberuhigung verwendet wird ist immer noch umstritten, aber es gibt ja auch noch die Alternative “area:highway=traffic_island”
crodthauser (2025-05-06 22:16:02+00:00): Die PM betrifft diesen Changeset hier, 165811121, 165811187 und 1206736803.

Ich bin da durcheinandergekommen und von https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:traffic?uselang=en hatte ich noch nie gehört. Ich werde area:highway=traffic_island verwenden und zunächst die Art der Insel in description=* oder note=* unterbringen. Dass crossing:island nicht an Flächen verwendet werden soll, finde ich falsch, aber so steht es in der Wiki.

Dass traffic_calming umstritten ist, sehe ich nicht. Ich sehe eher das Gegenteil und eine ungünstige Dokumentation. Die englische Wiki schreibt sehr deutlich, dass traffic_calming auch nur für Verkehrsberuhigung verwendet werden soll. Die deutsche Wiki widerspricht sich bereits im Beschreibungstext und in der Einleitung. Der Disclaimer wurde aufgrund einer Formulierung einer alten Fassung der engl. Wiki verfasst. Und das dient jetzt der Legitimierung, auch (weiterhin) nicht verkehrsberuhigende Inseln als traffic_calming zu taggen. Es ist wie eine selbsterfüllende Prophezeiung. Die Threads https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/verkehrsinsel/91220 und https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/traffic-calming-island/95745 zeigen auch einen starken Konsens im Mehrheitssinn.
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:55:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:54:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
Sylabowy Kot (2025-05-04 18:17:41+00:00): Zapomniałęm dopisać w tym changeset źródła nazw czyli jak to skrótowo nazywam "artykuły branżowe" - na stronie mazowiecki.pzd.pl są udostępnione papiery które podają nazwy róznych ROD i ułatwiają identyfikację.
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:57:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:57:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:53:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
habi (2025-05-06 07:43:04+00:00): Ciao ctr_corner
Ich sehe, dass du in Bern grad viel Veloinfrastruktur-Tagging machst.
Ich finde, dass die Erfassung, dass es *keine* markierte Velospur hat, schöner wäre mit `cycleway=no` anstatt dem etwas komplizierteren `cycleway:both=no`.
Was meinst du dazu?
Ä Gruess usem Liebifäud,
habi
habi (2025-05-06 07:48:52+00:00): Ciao ctr_corner
Gerade hier finde ich, dass du mit deiner Änderung (https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=165812884) die Daten verschlechtert hast.
Ich hatte das Velospur-Tagging als cycleway=lane + cycleway:lane=advisory erfasst, jetzt ist es "nur" noch cycleway:both=lane, ohne die Information, dass das ein von Autos überfahrbare Velospur ist.
Was ist dein Ziel mit den Velotagging-Änderungen hier in Bern?
Gruss,
habi
habi (2025-05-06 07:49:55+00:00): Weil du hier einen Knoten wild verschoben hast (https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=165812970) habe ich das Changeset zurückgesetzt.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165878435
habi (2025-05-06 07:51:52+00:00): Das explizite 'nein' für Velospur auf dem kurzen Kirchenfeldstrassenbitz habe ich hier wieder eingetragen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165878482
onovy (2025-06-08 11:51:57+00:00): Ahoj,

prosím o dodržování pravidel mapování elektrického vedení:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Elektrick%C3%A1_veden%C3%AD

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6466829972/history/4

zde již správně otagovaný transformátor jsi změnil na špatný zápis.

Děkuji.
Richard (2025-09-30 15:36:40+00:00): Hi - the long-standing convention in OSM, dating back to 2011, is that the National Byway is network=rcn. This is due to its Regional Route-like character; the fact it's not truly a national network but just covers some regions of the UK; and for differentiation from the (Sustrans/WWCT) National Cycle Network. I've retagged the superroute relation accordingly.

(writing as someone who has a spare National Byway sign above their desk ;) )
mueschel (2025-05-08 10:38:55+00:00): Hi,
please check the wiki for common socket:* tags - the ones you used here are not used in any other place.
eggie (2025-05-04 19:51:45+00:00): Dah Navazor... Wellicht amenity=charging_station?
Laadpaal?

MVG
eggie
Navazor (2025-05-04 21:11:43+00:00): Dag Eggie, ik begrijp de opmerking niet?
eggie (2025-05-04 21:18:38+00:00): Hoi... charging_point doet niets in osm..
Kijk even hier...
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station

Meest gebruikelijk is charging_station.
Dat is meer de hoofdtag. 
Groet..
eggie
Navazor (2025-05-04 21:37:34+00:00): Heb het aangepast, bedankt voor de feedback
Dimitar155 (2025-05-04 18:40:41+00:00): Струва ми се доста голямо по площ за една вилна зона. Може би са няколко, които са свързани?
DwarfNebula_ (2025-05-04 22:09:36+00:00): Hey, waarom zouden deze vergeten zijn? De route van de A2 naar de Jaarbeurs is hier nog steeds van primair belang. Het stuk van de A12 naar de Jaarbeurs is beperkt door de Europalaan aan te passen tussen de Overste den Oudenlaan en Europaplein.
A67-A67 (2025-05-05 07:47:58+00:00): Hoi,
De classificaties primair tot unclassified zijn bedoeld om de plaats in het netwerk aan te geven, niet de uitbouwstatus. 

Een deel van de Europalaan is versmald. Dat op zich verlaagd de classificatie niet. De classificatie wordt verlaagd doordat de gehele primaire schakel minder doorgaand verkeer heeft. Dan wordt dus de gehele primaire weg onderdeel van het secundaire netwerk.

Het is niet de bedoeling om gaten te slaan in het primaire, secundaire of tertiaire netwerk op de specificieke plaats waar versmald is, of om losse eindjes te creëren. 

De fysieke versmalling kan worden weergegeven met tags als lanes en width. Het aantal rijstroken was al aangepast op de Europalaan.
eggie (2025-05-04 19:42:04+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  Beter niet naar de daken kijken bij schuin genomen luchtfoto's. Alle gebouwen zijn directe en ingemeten import vanuit het kadaster.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-05-04 19:49:22+00:00): Restored building_shape
JezCrow (2025-05-16 17:11:29+00:00): Hi Robert, I'm not sure what your aim was here - changing lots of current shops to ones that don't exist any more - First Choice, Carphone Warehouse, Mothercare, etc. 
If you want to map what was there previously then https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/ is the place for that.

Regards,
Jez
JezCrow (2025-05-16 17:58:48+00:00): This changeset have been reverted due to mapping using old satellite imagery.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166363086
wilczywilk (2025-06-11 10:38:02+00:00): Tor został rozebrany, nie ma po nim praktycznie śladu, nie wiem czy jest sens go oznaczać.
mtk2 (2025-06-11 19:16:25+00:00): To prawda, niewiele tego zostało, ale po zaznaczeniu tego toru wyjaśnia się  dlaczego są pozostałości przejazdu kolejowego na  Strefowej (o ile już go nie rozebrali przy okazji budowy ronda). Widać też, że przedłużenie tego toru prowadzi na wiadukt wąskotorówki nad obwodnicą, co wyjaśnia dlaczego jest on taki szeroki. Kontekst otoczenia jest wyraźniejszy.
wilczywilk (2025-06-11 19:23:37+00:00): Pozostałości przejazdu też już nie ma (rozebrany tak jak piszesz). Rozumiem kontekst historyczny, ale podstawową zasadą mapowania jest to, że rysujemy stan obecny, a fakty są takie że ta bocznica została fizycznie zlikwidowana i nie ma po niej śladu.
mtk2 (2025-06-11 20:22:36+00:00): Akurat w przypadku linii kolejowych mapowanie  historyczne jest chyba wciąż tematem otwartym (dyskusja na temat railway=razed, itp.). Bocznica jakiejś wartości historycznej nie ma (chyba), więc zaznaczona być nie musi, ale była częścia najdłuższej bocznicy w mieście (ciąg aż do Zakładów Mięsnych), więc może warto ją pozostawić, aby pokazywała się na ORM?
wilczywilk (2025-06-11 20:37:16+00:00): Nie prowadziła do żadnego ważnego miejsca (ot bocznica do zakładów przemysłowych jakich pełno w Polsce), obecnie stoi nawet na jej przebiegu budynek firmy Porta. Nie ma po niej śladu w tym miejscu więc pozostaję przy zdaniu że nie powinna być zmapowana. Przy samych zakładach mięsnych zamieniono ją przecież już dawno temu na ulicę Produkcyjną, bez sensu byłoby mapować wtedy i tory i drogę. Mapowanie opuszczonych torowisk ma sens jeśli fizycznie są one jeszcze w terenie.
wilczywilk (2025-06-11 20:42:21+00:00): Najlepiej jakby było oznaczenie "historic", wtedy miałoby to sens. Ale z tego co wiem to chyba nie ma takiego tagu dla torowisk.
mtk2 (2025-06-12 19:05:23+00:00): Gdyby ta stara bocznica była zwykłym torem przy torze głównym, to by mnie nie zainteresowała. Jak na bocznicę jest jest ona jednak dośc nietypowa, bo bardzo długa, poprowadzona samodzielnie i przez to bardziej podobna do zwykłej linii kolejowej niż technicznej bocznicy. Była tak długa i odrębna, że jako jedyna(!) bocznica jest zaznaczona na mapie topograficznej Ełku i okolic (WZKart 2006). Na mapie tej wygląda raczej jak obwodnica kolejowa miasta, a nie bocznica. Poza tym pozostały po niej bardzo zaawansowane budowle inżynieryjne, jak przewymiarowany wiadukt nad obwodnicą, długi i wysoki nasyp, przyczółki mostu na strumieniem koło Podmiejskiej (nie zwykły przepust). Bez zaznaczenia przebiegu torów to wszystko traci kontekst (także dla kolejnych mapujących).
Ponieważ bocznica jest tagowana jako abandoned, więc nie jest renderowana w OSM, więc nikomu nie przeszkadza. W ORM ją widać, więc zainteresowani ją znajdą i docenią.
Takich porzuconych lini kolejowych zmapowano bardzo wiele, np. rozebrana linia Pisz- Giżycko (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17901919/). W jej trasie są teraz drogi, ścieżki, ale jest zmapowana jako linia kolejowa bo to wyjaśnia kontekst. Nie widać jej na standardowej mapie, więc nikomu nie przeszkadza. Tak jak nasza nietypowa bocznica.
wilczywilk (2025-06-13 13:04:16+00:00): Skoro aż tak ci na tym zależy to przymknę oko ;)
eggie (2025-05-04 19:46:16+00:00): Feedback  Je hebt hier per abuis adres 	Ieplaan 86 ergens anders heen gesleept.

Voor parkeerstroken hier wat info.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:parking%3Dstreet_side

MVG
eggie