piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
rempshaener (2025-12-12 21:27:39+00:00): Hallo,

du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Saugstellen aus Fließgewässern werden als emergency=suction_point erfasst.
D. h.: alles andere bitte rauslöschen und ersetzen.
Noch eine Anmerkung: Hier https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=816886222280646&focus=photo&x=0.4514378433989927&y=0.673324216065768&zoom=0&lat=50.591710417462&lng=10.06285694244&z=17 z. B. ist keine Saugstelle erkennbar. In OSM gilt das Prinzip, dass erfasst wird, was vor Ort erkennbar ist. Ohne Schild sollten solche Objekte mangels Überprüfbarkeit eigentlich nicht erfasst werden.

Bei Fragen bitte melden.
Viele Grüße
Susi69 (2025-12-13 10:01:19+00:00): Vielen Dank für das Feedback, Änderungen umgesetzt
rempshaener (2025-12-13 19:24:09+00:00): Hallo,

danke für deine Anpassung.

Aus dem
content=water
drinking_water=no
emergency=suction_point
name=Saugstelle

sollte werden
emergency=suction_point
water_source=stream

Insbesondere „name“ ist problematisch, da Wasserentnahmestellen keinen Namen haben.

Viele Grüße
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-01-18 20:47:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 177391275 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious changes in Somali, Ethiopia and the USA
Frans S (2025-12-12 10:51:02+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
C: Collected adjacent buildings and mapped it as 1 building.

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175824720
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-01-18 20:47:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 177391275 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious changes in Somali, Ethiopia and the USA
jayaddison (2026-03-29 01:38:15+00:00): For Mereway (e.g. 4189557 and 1159463221), as a dual_carriageway=yes I think that bicycle=yes is implied.  With that in mind and also the presence of a dedicated cycle path nearby (67827330), I would suggest removing the bicycle=yes tagging from the dual carriageway -- especially as parts of it are tagged lit=no in addition.

I learned of this changeset from a forum post at: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/i-have-a-problem-with-a-user-being-very-rigid-with-legal-interpretation-of-access-rules/139067/27
KennyDap (2025-12-12 02:28:06+00:00): Fix Vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175826733
Fizzie-DWG (2025-12-12 02:46:42+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19159
jan_k31 (2026-01-02 14:42:15+00:00): Ik zie dat je in de laatste change bicycle op 'no' gezet hebt. Echter is fietsen juist sinds een tijdje juist wel toegestaan ( zie https://ibb.co/gMwpCnT5 )
Zilvervisje (2026-01-06 19:37:42+00:00): Dat stond al zo. Ik heb alleen de naam aangepast :)
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-12 01:43:56+00:00): wycofanie 175796844,175796786,175796697,175796110
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-12 01:44:36+00:00): https://revert.osmz.ru/11897

wycofanie
175795984
175795574
175795562
175795527
175795319
175778462
175778439
175778314
175778293
175778259
175778235
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-12 01:46:42+00:00): https://revert.osmz.ru/11898

wycofanie 175778158,175778128,175778087,175778045,175777962,175777911,175777875,175777840,175777405
fortera_au (2025-12-12 02:01:13+00:00): Hi, you've added these tags to the building for the office, not to the caravan park site itself. The building and office tags should be restored, and the name, brand:*, addr:*, tourism and website tags should go on the way covering the whole park.
MKT HPG (2025-12-12 02:22:02+00:00): Restored the changes. Thanks!
muralito (2025-12-12 13:02:33+00:00): Hi. "Plaza del Ejercito" is the name of the park, but not the name of the avenue.
What source are you using?
archpdx (2025-12-13 05:18:20+00:00): It's convention for modifiers in ref to be left unabbreviated https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States_roads_tagging/Routes#Nationwide
ivandhfr (2025-12-12 12:13:55+00:00): Could you provide the source for this change? 

Last time I surveyed it about two months ago, the road access you modified was indeed no-car access, although cars can physically get through in certain situations, for example, during events when the chain barriers on the open parking area are temporarily removed.

Also, the bar barrier at the entrance doesn’t cover the full width of the road because it’s meant to let motorcycles pass to the parking area; it’s there to warn cars from entering. With your change, motorcycles wouldn’t be able to reach the parking area anymore.

I’d appreciate your clarification.
Supaplex (2025-12-12 09:39:34+00:00): 已經修正，加了新位置的點位
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175835494
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175826686
Sheila Nguyen (2025-12-12 02:32:35+00:00): This is the Sunterra Lagoon, the construction finish earlier this year
Josuer (2025-12-13 14:50:14+00:00): Hola Elkin, subiste algunos cambios en donde cambiaste nombre de la Avenida 15 de Abril por "dddd". Ten cuidado de revisar tus contribuciones antes de subirlas. Saludos.
MxxCon (2026-01-21 00:27:06+00:00): Hello.
Please note that just because some language is not spoken in a given area doesn't mean name= tags for such language should be deleted from OSM features. People from all over the world use OSM and they speak all kinds of languages, so having *correct* multi-lingual tags is perfectly valid and should NOT be deleted.
Please restore those delete name tags.
If you need assistance with that, feel free to ask for help. 👍
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175827617
user_5359 (2025-12-12 08:45:42+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice the difference between leisure=park and leisure=pitch! Please see our wiki at https://wiki.osm.org
Benoît C MdP (2025-12-12 08:01:55+00:00): Bonjour Numisk,

Cette voie a bien un panneau d'aire piétonne en entrée. Je corrige 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/53578236

Bonne continuation

Benoît
NumisK (2025-12-12 12:59:04+00:00): Hi Benoît C MdP, thank you for reverting the changeset. I made the edits after seeing vehicles on the road on BDOrtho IGN imagery. Upon further inspection, I saw the Panoramax imagery for the south end of the street with the pedestrian sign, also the text “Circulation interdite aux véhicules motorisés sauf desserte interne” below. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access tells that motor_vehicle=* tag can be used with highway=pedestrian. So I’m thinking either motor_vehicle=destination or motor_vehicle=delivery can be added to the way. Please let me know if it’s something you would agree with. 
All the best.
Benoît C MdP (2025-12-12 13:05:34+00:00): Bonjour Numisk,
Merci pour ton retour.
Ce n'est pas nécessaire d'ajouter ces attributs puisqu'en France, c'est le statut par défaut.
En France, les véhicules motorisés (et donc les livraisons) sont autorisés par défaut dans les aires piétonnes pour la desserte interne. https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/article_lc/LEGIARTI000045650507

Bonne continuation

Benoît
NumisK (2025-12-15 12:48:41+00:00): Merci pour cette explication Benoît, je comprends. Bonne journée.
mueschel (2025-12-14 09:29:16+00:00): Are you sure there is gate right in the middle of this major road?
Anusha Kodi (2026-04-17 03:06:20+00:00): "You're correct, that wasn't supposed to be there. The barrier was mistakenly added, but the update has been reverted and the road is back to normal now." Thank you for your valuable feedback. I will make sure to be more cautious in future. Thank you.
kre777 (2026-07-04 06:42:49+00:00): Hallo Piene
Der Weg way/264738288 wurde von dir vom Path zum Footway umgeschrieben. Der Unterschied: vorher Fahrräder-yes jetzt Fahrräder-no. Ohne konkrete Beschilderung dürfen Fahrräder ihn benutzen und es ist auch kein klassischer Gehsteig. Path war Richtig!
Auch Interressant: way/404754168 zum Footway verändert aber traffic_sign:240 gelassen & und in den zugehörigen Straßenstück (von Dir eher "sinnfrei" zerstückelt) dann ebenfalls den bicycle:use_sidepath Eintrag nicht entfernt.
In der Weidachstraße way/772792884 sind deine sidewalk Einträge ein Duplikat.
In der Straße Guggenbichl way/229712566/ findet sich wieder mal sidewalk_both:separate ohne beidseitige Wege. Auch dürfte der Namenseintrag falsch sein. (soll: noname:yes) 
Der Pfadstück way/1459277948 ist jetzt bicycle:no. Generell ist durch dein Umschreiben von Path zum Footway der gesamte Chiemsee Radwegeintrag kein bisschen besser geworden.
>Fazit: jede Menge Murks<
Grüße kre777
Piene (2026-07-14 20:49:36+00:00): Hallo kre777

way/229712566/ - Guggenbichl: Der Name steht so an den Häusern unter der Hausnummer. Sidewalk habe ich korrigiert. Das hatte ich leider damals an mehreren Stellen falsch gemacht.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/772792884 - Weidachstraße:
Wie wird das korrekt getaggt? Der Radweg ist ja direkt an der Straße und nicht baulich getrennt? Warum ist da ein separater Track gemappt? Wäre es nicht korrekt diesen zusätzlichen Track zu entfernen?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1459277948: Ja, korrekt. Fahrradfahren ist dort nicht erlaubt.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/264738288 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/404754168 muss ich mir nochmal genau vor Ort ansehen...

Vielen Dank für die Hinweise!
Gruß
Piene
kre777 (2026-07-16 08:33:28+00:00): Hallo Piene
Das "Guggenbichl" an den Häusern bezieht sich auf den Ortsnamen. Wenn's Richtig eingetragen ist, so findet sich addr:place (und nicht addr:street) unter der Adresse der entsprechenden Gebäude. Übrigens auch Zufahrten (hw-service & hw-service-driveway) tragen normalerweise keine Namen.

Weidachstraße: Fußwege als separate Tracks mappen ist in OSM erlaubt. Richtig sollte sein: Footway, bicycle:yes, traffic_sign=DE:239,1022-10, und da die Beschilderung nur einseitig vorhanden ein oneway_yes in Nördliche Richtung taggen (Straßenlinie: sidewalk:left:oneway:bicycle=-1). Dein bicycle:signed=yes ist im traffic_sign enthalten. (Es ist nicht klar was der Eintrag angeben soll). Mir persönlich gefällt der Eintrag als sidewalk als Eigenschaft_der_Straßenlinie auch besser. Ist Ansichtssache. Entfernen wird aber oft kritisch gesehen. 

way/1459277948: "Fahrradfahren ist dort nicht erlaubt" (ist auch Chiemsee Radweg Relation). Die footway zuvor und footway danach bicycle=yes, und das Stück dazwischen bicycle=no. echt jetzt...? 
Grüße kre777
user_5359 (2025-12-30 16:02:43+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/633256831. What is the mean of the tag bpjs = yes?
celmap (2025-12-31 06:21:58+00:00): @user_5359 Here's more info for BPJS:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BPJS_Kesehatan

Basically, a new tag for healthcare facilities that accept BPJS universal healthcare.
user_5359 (2025-12-31 08:36:40+00:00): Thanks for the explanation! Are you familiar with the website https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Global_Healthsites_Mapping_Project or, for more details, https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Import_of_the_Brazilian_National_Register_of_Health_Facilities? The latter defines the prefix insurance for accepted insurance. It is also used to refer to the type of insurance offered by an insurance agency.
celmap (2026-01-03 09:45:20+00:00): Thank you!
`insurance=*` seems like a good idea. I'll try to bring up the topic to the local community.
Cheers!
muralito (2025-12-12 12:51:41+00:00): Hi. Why did you map like this? You can drive SW Avenida Sagitario and take Botavara...
RuvubuRiver (2025-12-12 19:36:56+00:00): Hello muralito,
I was going off of imagery to simplify the junction. I see your point on how this should be modeled and will defer to your knowledge.
b-jazz (2025-12-14 03:47:33+00:00): RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19118627

Thanks for your contributions Ben. We do appreciate them. But we need to work together as a community and when you are introducing many many errors into the map that others have to come behind you and clean up, it creates tension. Please don't get upset and tell us to "relax". You are causing more work for others and we want to help you eliminate these and make all of our lives easier and make the map cleaner.

As for the above mentioned node. It is at the boundary of a fairway and a bunker. Those two items need to share every node along that boundary and not zig-zag across each other. I see that you are using JOSM now and I commend that change. There is a feature of JOSM where you can "Follow" an existing line by sharing nodes. So if the bunker exists and you are drawing the fairway, touch the first shared node and then the next shared node to set direction. Press F once and it will extend the line to the next node in the given direction. Hold F and it will continuously extend the line until the area is closed or it comes to an intersection. Hope this helps.
benguuuuu (2025-12-14 04:30:51+00:00): No worries - doing my best over here.  If this is for relation 19118627, I didn't map that course, but I did tweak it.  I didn't fix everything, though.  For courses that I am mapping from scratch, I am doing my best to do it right.
benguuuuu (2025-12-14 04:43:44+00:00): Oh, if it is for this changeset, then yes there were a few holes mapped already and I finished it.  I thought I had fixed all of their errors, but I must of missed it.  I have been following the wiki you provided so these should get better as I go.  And I only said "relax" because you came on pretty heavy - I am not trying to make it harder for anyone else (trust me I hate cleaning up courses I come across as well), just new and learning the ropes.  Appreciate the patience.
muralito (2025-12-12 12:48:20+00:00): Hi. Please remind that car drivers are not the only users of the data. This segment was blocked for cars with guardrails, but pedestrian and bycicles can use it.
RuvubuRiver (2025-12-12 19:38:17+00:00): Hi muralito, thanks for pointing this out. I normally aim to take pedestrian access into account, but I unintentionally overlooked it when making this edit. I’ll defer to your changes here. Have a great day!
BubbaJuice (2025-12-12 05:28:07+00:00): Also some voltages here: https://ssvec.org/downloads/inserts/2018/August-2018-Special.pdf
felipeeugenio (2025-12-12 13:57:29+00:00): Hola. por favor escribir las palabras completas. Las contracciones no tienen mucho sentido en un medio digital (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names)

Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175829726
Hung Tran 9x0 (2025-12-12 07:17:22+00:00): Người ta lắp rào phân làn lâu lắm rồi, sao bạn lại sửa như khi chưa lắp vậy?
Hung Tran 9x0 (2025-12-12 07:17:47+00:00): Gần đây bạn có đi qua đây không vậy?
Hung Tran 9x0 (2025-12-12 07:18:40+00:00): Hay nguồn của bạn chưa được cập nhật??
Hung Tran 9x0 (2025-12-12 07:59:03+00:00): Nếu bạn không sửa lại tình trạng đường về đúng thực tế hiện tại, tối tôi sẽ sửa lại nhé
felipeeugenio (2025-12-12 13:52:48+00:00): Hola. Los semáforos se ponen en el lugar de detenciónd e los vehículos. Sabemos que la mayoría de los semáforos en Chile están mapeados erróneamente, pero lo estamos solucionando. Fue corregido.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175829940
felipeeugenio (2025-12-12 13:48:55+00:00): Hola.
Las señales del tránsito, cuando están en vías bidireccionales, tienen que ser complementadas con un direction=forward/backward. Ya fueron corregidos.

Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175830292
蕉饼电脑 (2025-12-12 06:23:04+00:00): This is proposed to be an urban road anyways
source: https://www.fzlj.gov.cn/xjwz/zwgk/zfxxgkzl/xrmzfgzbm_11124/ljxgtzyj/gkml/ghjh_13309/202209/P020220921643529436290.pdf
felipeeugenio (2025-12-12 13:15:58+00:00): Hola. Gracias por sus ediciones. Por favor usar nombres oficiales y no descriptivos (Strip center, retorno)

Fueron corregidos.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175830612
democat (2025-12-12 07:07:46+00:00): Hey there, thanks for your contribution! Can you add the name of the apartment complex to a new area for the apartment complex itself, and then add the building number to the "ref=" key? The complex name should not be in the building name.
n-dal-fixes (2025-12-12 08:25:40+00:00): Done, thanks!
b-jazz (2025-12-14 03:50:12+00:00): RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1457983693

When drawing golf course areas (such as greens, fairways, bunkers, tees, etc.), please be aware that the ways used to outline those areas can't cross over each other. Fairway outlines shouldn't cross over greens or bunkers or other fairways for example. If you could go back and clean up where you've made this mistake, that would be helpful. But more importantly, if you could stop from doing this in the future, it would be greatly appreciated. Please read the wiki for instructions and examples of how to better map golf courses: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls. If you have any questions about golf course mapping, feel free to reach out.
Hung Tran 9x0 (2026-07-07 15:24:59+00:00): Tên đường ở Hà Nội các bạn có thể để nguyên chữ 'Đường' và 'Phố' không? Thứ nhất là bảng tên viết đầy đủ như vậy thì nên để tên như vậy. Thứ hai là đa số mọi người ở đây khi tìm đường cũng đều nói tên đầy đủ.
JoeG (2025-12-31 00:38:19+00:00): Hi! I intend to revert deleted walls and retaining walls in this one.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175831978
JoeG (2025-12-31 00:38:25+00:00): Hi! I intend to revert deleted walls and retaining walls in this one.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175831978
Tatfahren (2025-12-12 15:31:31+00:00): Hast du die ganzen Gebäude in den Kleingärten vor Ort geprüft und eingetragen? Wenn nicht empfehle ich dir einmal JOSM auszuprobieren, da du dort alle diese Gebäude mit Overpass-Turbo laden kannst, und alles auf einmal mit wenigen klicks korrigieren kannst, statt in SC jedes Gebäude einzeln auszuwählen.

Zusätzlich fügt streetcomplete automatisch "source=survey" hinzu, wenn dies nicht der Fall sein sollte (wie bist du in all die Kleingartenparzellen gelangt um zu prüfen das es sich nicht um einen einfachen Geräteschuppen handelt), gibst du damit, wenn auch wahrscheinlich unbeabsichtigt eine falsche Quelle an. Zur Korrektur solltest du entweder einen Kommentar im changeset mit der tatsächlichen Quelle hinterlassen, oder SCEE modifizieren, so das es eine andere Quelle angibt.

Ich hab vor 2 Jahren mal Dachformen übers Luftbild mit SC eingetragen, und dazu einen extra Account erstellt, auf dessen Profilseite ich die in diesen changesets verwendete Quelle angegeben habe.
topius (2025-12-12 10:05:40+00:00): These are not quarries, but wellsites for gas extraction. I have changed them accordingly.
SpinOff (2025-12-12 21:02:08+00:00): To jest trochę jak z remontami dróg. Też są tymczasowe, ale w OSM mapujemy stan faktyczny.
eggie (2025-12-12 08:31:18+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
JoeG (2025-12-31 00:34:46+00:00): Hi! I intend to revert deleted fences and footway=sidewalk in this changeset.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175833035
Anonymous36863 (2025-12-12 10:06:31+00:00): There are photos on Google Maps that show the cusines.
rhhs (2025-12-12 10:28:58+00:00): Please never use Google Maps or other copyrighted sources of information in editing OSM https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google
Cuisine=* is used to tag what a restaurant specialises in (Chinese food, breakfast, etc.), not for listing everything on the menu or ingredients of the items on the menu. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cuisine

You're doing a lot of good work, but sometimes there are some things you need to learn. I'm trying to help you with it
Anonymous36863 (2025-12-12 14:38:39+00:00): Organic Maps currently tells me what food they offer. Next version, it won't because you deleted the cusine tag. Is that what you wanted?
Anonymous36863 (2025-12-12 14:40:16+00:00): Plus, I think restaurant is more fitting for the place. It can be both an events venue and a restaurant.
rhhs (2025-12-12 15:29:33+00:00): Have a look at what values are most often used for that tag here https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/cuisine#values Also consider https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_map_temporary_events_and_temporary_features (if the food they serve changes often, it takes a lot of effort to keep it up to date)

I've never been there; I based my edit on the information on the website. If you've been there, you know better so please change it if you think it's better that way.
ChrissW-R1 (2025-12-14 13:42:24+00:00): I changed again the tag key of cusine to cuisine. I can't comment on the content; my changeset only deals with the correct tag key.

https://osm.org/changeset/175919394
JoeG (2025-12-31 00:33:51+00:00): Hi! I intend to revert deleted fences and footway=sidewalk in this changeset.
osmviborg (2025-12-12 08:02:46+00:00): 'sport centre' er den korrekte betegnelse: https://lgms.nl/p/osm/cached-wiki/?page=Tag:leisure%3Dsports_centre
eggie (2025-12-12 08:25:53+00:00): Dag Hans...  Er hoort geen adres op een laadpaal. 
Adres heb ik verwijderd.
Wel kun je andere eigenschappen toevoegen. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station
MVG
eggie
chris66 (2025-12-22 11:47:25+00:00): Hi,
ist hier noch gesperrt?

Die Brücke wurde ja freigegeben.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-12-12 08:01:13+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Podana kombinacja addr:city + addr:place jest nieprawidłowa.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1505834175
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3374064050
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12520729888

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eggie (2025-12-12 08:22:54+00:00): Dag Marc,
   Tip... 
Beetje lastig dat Vershof
Broodhuys de Beerse Bakker en Slagerij van Hoof kun je apart toevoegen op de adresnodes.
Nu wat onduidelijk wat bedoeld worden.

MVG
eggie
Marc Olzheim (2025-12-12 08:27:27+00:00): Mjah, het is de naam van het gebouw en dat staat ook op de gevel.
Ik voeg de winkels erin zo idd toe.
eggie (2025-12-12 08:30:19+00:00): Top!
JoeG (2025-12-31 00:32:08+00:00): Hi! I intend to revert deleted fences in this changeset.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175833961
george1201 (2025-12-13 10:43:16+00:00): Trägst du auch noch den Parkplatz selbst ein? Im Moment gibt es hier nur die Parkplatz-Zufahrtsstraßen service=parking_aisle.
george1201 (2026-02-10 12:37:50+00:00): Danke.