piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
bxl-forever (2026-07-27 12:53:37+00:00): Hello, and welcome to OSM.

Please do not use titles such as "04.07.2026 01:31" when uploading changes.

The database already automatically records the date and time of every upload. Adding this in your title adds no useful information for other mappers.

The changeset description is where you must explain, in a few words, what and why you edited the map. OSM is based on mutual trust between mappers.

Here is a documentation page (in Russian) about this: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Good_changeset_comments

Thanks.
ElliottPlack (2026-07-04 17:58:29+00:00): Hi there, we should revert this update though I do appreciate the attention to detail. DelDOT just updated this section 45 MPH throughout. I'm here on-site today. Have you been through recently?
EP_Repair (2026-07-04 18:07:54+00:00): Reverted via changeset 185104008: user updated speedlimits based on outdated street level imagery. DelDOT recently reconfigured this section of roadway.
jhaluska80 (2026-07-05 01:10:02+00:00): Sorry a freak high intensity storm has knocked out my Internet has been out for almost a day.  I'm at a store on my phone.  I don't think a revert was warranted unless they also removed the signs otherwise the mistake could be repeated.  No I haven't been through recently, I was just investigating the note.
Joseph R P (2026-07-04 14:50:39+00:00): If you make a sudden revert of another changeset, please use a changeset comment that is more descriptive of what edits you are making and provide a rationale as to why you're making them, or leave a reply on the edits you are reverting to discuss why you believe they should be reverted.  You have been asked numerous times in the past to use more descriptive changeset comments: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=19693996

This style of editing that involves a lot of rapidly reverting the edits of other users, using vague changeset comments, and neglecting the comments and questions from other editors on your edits is not constructive. Please try to improve your communication and to not be as combative with your editing.
Joseph R P (2026-07-04 15:10:24+00:00): I should also not that I made this edit since this stretch of highway is not part of Route 24, which is tagged as a motorway, but rather a part of Route 114 which is a trunk/primary road. It should not be tagged as a motorway because of a single interchange or because of another motorway branching off of it. From an on-ground perspective, traffic going south on the primary segment on Route 114 is not going to enter a freeway for barely a quarter of a mile before continuing on the trunk section, it's going to simply continue along the same non-freeway road that passes through one partial interchange with a different highway.
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-07-05 01:21:23+00:00): I tried to restore it back, but Cube reverted them with the same comment ("Corrections."). That's not to mention the fact that this segment of RI 114 is not even a freeway, as it has at-grade intersections with a parking aisle (they leads to a historic monument) and a frontage road.
cubbe8 (2026-07-05 01:37:59+00:00): Sorry, but this is all wrong. First of all, there is no parking aisle, I don’t even know what you are talking about. Second, the logic that people would get on the motorway and come off is true, as to continue on RI 114 you have to take what is signed as a 1 lane exit off of the mainline. Third, this situation with the “parking aisle” you are seeing is not a parking aisle, it’s the start of the shoulder for RI 24.
cubbe8 (2026-07-05 01:39:10+00:00): Also, as seen in your bio, you guys are not even from an area close to here, and have never driven on these roads.
Joseph R P (2026-07-05 02:03:23+00:00): Not every highway with a ramp or interchange is a motorway. What would make this short segment more of a motorway than Route 78 bypassing Westerly or Route 1 in Narragansett. You seem to use what the state officially designates a highway as when classifying roads, so I think it's relevant for me to bring up that RIDOT does not recognize this stretch of road as a "freeway or expressway": https://www.dot.ri.gov/documents/maps/Functionalmap.pdf

Furthermore, "you're not from here" is a very poor, territorial excuse that is pointless when road classification relies more on the general knowledge of the US highway system more than being a local to the area. Your assumption that I have not been on these roads is also false. My mother is from the Boston area and grew up in East Greenwich, so I have visited this area frequently and specifically have been to Aquidneck and along these roads on a previous vacation to New England I had with my family.

Regardless of whether or not I have even stepped in the state of Rhode Island, OpenStreetMap is intended to be a collaborative project, not one where every user controls an area. The "I'm from here, you're not" argument seems to be a quick cop-out anyway judging by your lack in willingness to have constructive discussions even with locals of the areas you edit, as I linked in a previous comment.
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-07-05 02:39:37+00:00): The "parking aisle" in question is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/44486245. If it's signed as an exit like you claim, there isn't any exit number documented in the junction:ref=* tags. Also, the name "West Main Road" is present on both sides of the interchange, so it should, naturally, be connected in the middle. All these facts together (at-grade intersections, ramps shouldn't have names, the awkward ending of Main Road on the north side of the interchange) lead me to believe that this is a main road, not a link road.
Marvk (2026-07-04 09:26:35+00:00): Hi grimnir666,
der name der Schule ist bereits, wie üblich, auf dem Schulgelände erfasst (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/928369239). Das Taggig-Schema für Schulen sieht vor, dass, wenn sich nur eine Schule auf dem Gelände befindet, alle Informationen über die Schule, inklusive des Namens, auf dem Schulgelände zu taggen (s. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dschool).

Daher würde ich vorschlagen, den Namen wieder vom Schulgebäude entfernen. building=school passt!

Ggf. könnten auch mal die Infos auf dem Schulgelände aktualisiert werden, die Schule scheint mindestens eine neue Website zu haben.

Zudem könnte man sich auf dem Gelände mal https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/116490805 anschauen, der name scheint mir beschreibend zu sein und somit eher nicht auf das Objekt zu gehören (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen#name_ist_nur_der_Name). Aber vielleicht kannst du das als (vermutlich) Ortskundiger besser einschätzen :-)

Beste Grüße
Marv
b-jazz (2026-07-04 02:41:53+00:00): I had to dig out the VA imagery to see that you weren't doing something totally crazy. Interesting modification to the area.

There is a problem with how you're drawing the fairway though. You are sharing nodes with the greens that are inside of the fairway. Topologically, this isn't a valid construct since there is a simpler representation of the fairway that would exclude the green instead. 

I also noticed you are touching other objects like bunkers with the fairway, but aren't sharing all the nodes. You should either share all the nodes at the boundary, or none of them. See node 13987073240 for example.
Orblivion (2026-07-04 17:10:57+00:00): Nevermind it looks like they moved! We should find that and add it.
ljc_jlyb (2026-07-04 04:38:41+00:00): Please keep your changes local - the boundary box spans multiple continents, which makes it harder to find which places were edited. Thank you.
Sammyhawkrad (2026-07-04 20:58:14+00:00): Hello Perst0, welcome to OSM. Note that the changes you upload are live and part of the real data. This is no playground, so you shouldn't be making example or trial edits.
mueschel (2026-07-23 10:02:41+00:00): Hi,
you used the tag 'ref:mujobchod_cz' and similar. 
Typically the country code is not added at the end of the key, but in the middle:

`ref:CZ:mujobchod`

Maybe you can use this scheme here as well?
Dvorný (2026-07-23 10:45:11+00:00): That is good point. I completely forgot about that. Thanks
Alshowaiey (2026-07-04 11:20:25+00:00): Please keep your changes local - the boundary box spans multiple continents, which makes it harder to find which places were edited. Thank you.
AmyGomezC (2026-07-06 07:16:07+00:00): Hello. Thank you for your comment. Could you explain how to do that? I just followed the instructions to look for an area within the Mapaton Regional 2026 campaign and did not change the boundary box, so it was involuntary. Please explain how I can avoid that. Thank you so much; your comments help me learn.
maptheworld2050 (2026-07-08 17:55:24+00:00): I believe Alshowaiey is saying that when possible you should avoid making changes in multiple countries/continents at once. (E.g. As a made-up example, if you want to change something in India and something in Mexico, you would make the change in India, save it, then make a change in Mexico, and save that.) Otherwise if you make both those changes at once, when people look in the change history they see a giant box spanning half the globe instead of two tiny boxes in Mexico and India.
JJIglesias (2026-07-04 02:11:13+00:00): Gracias por Colaborar con OSM-Bolivia. Por favor recordar Escuadrar las edificaciones apretando la letra Q o en el Mouse click derecho.

Las imágenes pueden distorsionar las edificaciones pero el 99% de ellas tienen ángulos a 90 grados y son simétricas y ortogonales. Las imágenes satélites son angulares NO verticales.

Por favor activa la opción ISSUES en el panel derecho de tu editor, para q te aparezcan tus errores, si los hubiera

Te sugerimos poner multiples edificaciones por cada conjunto de cambios (Changeset) y NO poner Nombres a las construcciones a no ser que tengan un Nombre real.

Ten cuidado de no permitir que los edificios se superpongan entre sí o con otros elementos ya mapeados, como las carreteras. Si se produce una superposición y aparece un aviso en el icono de advertencia (triángulo) del editor iD, no selecciones la opción ““marcar esto como superior/inferior””; en su lugar, elige ““ignorar este problema”” y desplaza el edificio que estás mapeando para asegurarte de que no se superponga con el otro objeto.

Los edificios no deben compartir nodos entre sí ni con otros elementos. Si esto ocurre accidentalmente, puedes utilizar la opción de desconectar (tecla ““D””) en el editor iD para separar los nodos (los nodos compartidos aparecen de color gris en lugar de blanco). Para evitar que esto suceda, mantén presionada la tecla ALT mientras colocas un nodo cerca de otro edificio; esto impedirá que los nodos se unan automáticamente.

Saludos cordiales y sigue mapeando.
VLD0251 (2026-07-06 12:52:02+00:00): Please verify whether “طريق المستشفى” and “طريق الخميس” are the official names of these roads. if they are only descriptions (roads leading to the hospital or to the Lekhmis market), the name tag should not be used
VLD0251 (2026-07-04 22:22:11+00:00): Hello,
Copying data from sources that are not compatible with the OpenStreetMap license is not permitted. please ensure that only compatible sources are used and provide references where necessary. additionally, the mosque, the school, and the cemetery all share the name “اهديل”. could you confirm that this is the official name of each of these places, or clarify the source used? 
Thank you.
user_15543111 (2026-07-07 01:58:42+00:00): Could you be more specific? In small villages, there is usually only one corresponding POI named after the village itself.
VLD0251 (2026-07-07 21:02:34+00:00): 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1535102743
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1535102745
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1535102746
VLD0251 (2026-07-07 21:11:53+00:00): Each school and each mosque usually has its own name. please do not use the village name as the name of these features.
alpacaMaps (2026-07-27 21:36:36+00:00): Howdy!

Thanks for mapping in your area! We appreciate everyone who is involved.

In this case, we received communication that the nodes placed in Spencer Iowa are traffic cameras and not Flock/ALPR nodes.

When identifying it can be helpful to reference https://deflock.org/identify, as it has examples of what each system looks like.

Thanks!
alpacaMaps
alpacaMaps (2026-07-27 21:36:35+00:00): Howdy!

Thanks for mapping in your area! We appreciate everyone who is involved.

In this case, we received communication that the nodes placed in Spencer Iowa are traffic cameras and not Flock/ALPR nodes.

When identifying it can be helpful to reference https://deflock.org/identify, as it has examples of what each system looks like.

Thanks!
alpacaMaps
alpacaMaps (2026-07-27 21:36:34+00:00): Howdy!

Thanks for mapping in your area! We appreciate everyone who is involved.

In this case, we received communication that the nodes placed in Spencer Iowa are traffic cameras and not Flock/ALPR nodes.

When identifying it can be helpful to reference https://deflock.org/identify, as it has examples of what each system looks like.

Thanks!
alpacaMaps
Comino (2026-07-04 07:56:07+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for adding Guest House Detarameso.
I have updated and added several missing tags.

Can you please add the address details and email?

Please also have a look at the Japanese wiki I wrote at: 
https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Merchants-in-Japan

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
BTC Map
Viajero Perdido (2026-07-06 16:59:10+00:00): Hi. It looks like there's also a pedestrian/bike connection between the 90/170 intersection and the alley immediately east; I see a dogleg in sat view.

This is a useful shortcut for a challenging bike route.
MelancholicSlav (2026-07-04 19:29:55+00:00): Can you please explain why you reverted my changeset? In my opinion, following the centerline does a much better job at displaying the "slaloming" nature of Cambridge Street created by the chicanes.
cubbe8 (2026-07-04 19:32:44+00:00): Standard practice is to map the street between the curbs, not the center line.
MelancholicSlav (2026-07-04 19:42:12+00:00): Sorry, but that is not true. Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highways#Carriageways
9142322 (2026-07-04 22:22:50+00:00): correction: for SW 192nd Ave
goodidea (2026-07-08 01:55:11+00:00): Hallo!

Bist du sicher, dass im Gebäude von Hedin Automotive auch ein Büro von Juris ist? würde mich sehr wundern ... die haben doch unlängst ein großes Gebäude gebaut in der Nähe nur für sich (Am Römerkastell 11 – siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/741687787). Oder machen die dort in einer Zweigstelle Automotive-Consulting? Falls die wirklich dort ein Büro haben: gibt es eine Etagenangabe, wo die sind? Weitere Infos (Webadresse etc.)?

Oder nur im Ort geirrt? – Dann sollte der Knoten wohl weg, den Juris (Am Römerkastell 11) ist bereits eingetragen ...

Der Knoten liegt jetzt eben in einer Fläche, die mit Hedin Automotive gemappt ist (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/738899019) – das müsste man dann eigentlich ändern, wenn da mehrere Firmen sind! Deshalb frage ich auch ...

Viele Grüße!
goodidea (2026-07-13 20:24:14+00:00): Hallo? Eine Antwort wäre mal nett ... OSM ist eine Community ....

Viele Grüße!
FDS2610 (2026-07-14 08:43:37+00:00): Hallo Goodidea,

Community heißt, man arbeitet mit, wenn es passt. Als entspann bitte deinen Tonfall.

Mir ist da wohl ein Fehler unterlaufen. Ich nehm es wieder raus.

Gruss.
goodidea (2026-07-15 12:05:04+00:00): Ich weiß nicht, was es an Tonfall zu kritisieren gibt. Nach 7 Tagen wäre eine Antwort halt mal nett ... Völlig neutrale Formulierung. Man kriegt hier leider oft genug gar keine Antwort, und es ist auch ein Aufwand, sowas überhaupt zu schreiben (und nicht das, was an OSM Spaß macht). Weiß ja nicht, ob du das schon mal gemacht hast und wie deine Erfahrungen da sind ...
Daher danke für deine Antwort und die Korrektur.
gurglypipe (2026-07-04 10:19:31+00:00): Thanks for fixing this! The duplicates were an accident (potentially caused by a bad network connection) and the original editor was wondering how to go about deleting them.

See discussion in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184930685

Was deleting the duplicates straightforward to do in JOSM?
didier2020 (2026-07-04 17:27:47+00:00): fixing duplicated is easy with josm :

look at 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Validator
and
https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Fr%3AHelp/Preferences/Validator
george1201 (2026-07-05 21:05:38+00:00): Warum entfernst du die Ländervorwahl +49? Ich mache das rückgängig.
confusedbuffalo (2026-07-06 08:35:18+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183345368
martinst (2026-07-07 15:24:25+00:00): Erlaubt die Quelle die Datenübernahme in OSM?
chefche (2026-07-08 08:13:59+00:00): Hallo,
danke für's Gegenprüfen.
Die Quelle enthält das Verbot in Prosa: "Während des gesamten Schifffahrtsbetriebs (März bis November)
ist in einem Bereich von 100 Metern um die Anlegestege das 		
Schwimmen und Stand-Up-Paddeln verboten.". Ich wüsste nicht, warum dieses Verbot ähnlich anderen Einschränkungen, die in Prosa in einem Dokument oder einer Beschilderung o.ä. verfasst sind, nicht mit geeigneten Mitteln kartiert werden dürften, in diesem Fall eben einer Zone. Eine Zutrittsbeschränkung auf einem Schild bedarf ja auch keiner speziellen Erlaubnis des Schildeigentümers für die Kartierung.
Viele Grüße
StC (2026-07-15 17:34:14+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre qui passe par là. Je m'occupe de la réparation.
jcarlson (2026-07-07 18:13:47+00:00): thanks for adding power features to the map! the poles along the line are usually tagged "power=pole", by the way.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185078354
Comino (2026-07-04 08:17:22+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for adding Franciacorta Tour.
I have updated and added several missing tags.

Please also have a look at: 
https://btcmap.org/map?merchant=41521#18/45.5385237/10.2239139

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
BTC Map
mueschel (2026-07-23 10:21:42+00:00): Hallo,
wie ist denn "maxheight:variable" zu verstehen? Klingt komisch...
mapper999 (2026-07-23 11:31:20+00:00): Hi, das ist eine verstellbare Höhenbegrenzung mit 2 möglichen Positionen, beschildert mit 4.3 m und 2.9 m. Hier im Hintergrund zu sehen: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=48.828287073563985&lng=8.86928615844181&z=17&pKey=410645254390028&focus=photo&x=0.39633916681312303&y=0.7017220575801597&zoom=1.6859985740477261
FajrAl (2026-07-17 15:47:54+00:00): Most buildings have been mapped, but many building footprints are significantly misaligned with the Esri imagery. Since Esri imagery has good resolution in this area, please review and realign the geometries where appropriate before marking the task as complete. Tip: Press Q to square rectangular buildings.
pitscheplatsch (2026-07-04 08:49:06+00:00): Hi, thanks for working on the Ladakh district reorganisation.

I can see that the 27 Apr 2026 Ladakh Gazette notification supports the creation of the new districts Sham, Nubra, Changthang, Zanskar and Drass, and it also lists the territorial limits by revenue village. However, could you please add a more precise source to this changeset / affected objects, ideally the official Gazette notification, rather than only `source=knowledge; research`?

Also, the changeset comment contains political/editorial wording (“Pure Gerrymandering!”). The underlying boundary update may be valid, but it would be better for OSM if the mapping record stays neutral and source-focused.

One more concern: the changeset note says Changthang district is not yet mapped, so the Ladakh relation is still incomplete even though Changthang is included in the official notification. Could you clarify whether the updated Ladakh relation is intended to be temporary/incomplete, and whether a follow-up changeset will add Changthang as an admin_level=5 district relation?

Thanks.
Awazed26 (2026-07-10 04:04:48+00:00): Hi @pitscheplatsch, thanks for the detailed review. A few clarifications based on my read of the changeset:
1. What I changed: I mainly updated the Ladakh relation metadata (admin_level values, member tags and relationship roles). No boundary ways or nodes were added, moved, or removed. All underlying geometry comes from existing contributions—not drawn fresh in this changeset. 
So the thing is Changthang doesn't exist in OSM yet. This predates my edits entirely. There's already a note tag documenting this gap and requesting someone create the boundary for Changthang. So yes, incomplete—but that was pre-existing, not caused by my update.

2. Also, I see your concern about editorial language. Unfortunately, since this changeset is already closed, I cannot edit or retract the original comment text directly. However, if there's consideration to remove or alter it through moderation channels, I'd respectfully argue the statement should remain in place.
The phrase is explicitly flagged as personal assessment, not presented as established fact. I know this looks like editorial commentary. I'm not pretending otherwise. What I am saying is—I've flagged it as my personal view so nobody mistakes it for official OSM-recorded fact. The technical edits stand on their own; this line just adds context.
To my knowledge, OSM guidelines discourage editorial content in technical records, though enforcement varies by community. From my standpoint, keeping this visible offers context for anyone reviewing the edit history later. Community members can decide final form, but my view is this belongs visible alongside the edit itself.

The Gazette notification you referenced was indeed my source—source=knowledge; research was shorthand notation pointing to that document. I appreciate you noting its relevance earlier in your message. Since this changeset is closed, I cannot modify source tagging on affected objects directly. If infrastructure allows post-submission corrections through admin guys, happy to pursue that route.
LeuvenNeedsTrams2 (2026-07-04 08:05:56+00:00): Pasted the wrong source

https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sint-Agathakerk_(Wilsele)
Comino (2026-07-14 20:15:58+00:00): Hi,

Can you please add the full address details? Thank you.

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
BTC Map
Maplev (2026-07-09 11:04:15+00:00): "KS Dogs"? "nursing_home"?! Skąd info, że w tym miejscu znajduje się dom opieki o takiej nazwie?
felipeeugenio (2026-07-05 14:37:03+00:00): Hola. Borró todos los edificios del colegio. Ya no están?
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185080913
limes11 (2026-07-04 09:59:05+00:00): Hallo KHRT, 

bitte bedenken, foot/bicycle/horse=yes sind alles default-Werte auf hw=track. Wenn da nur motor_vehicle-tags auf dem Weg sind, gibt es keine Notwendigkeit dies zu ergänzen. (Ich entferne das nicht systematisch, aber wenn ich solche Wege aus anderen Gründen überarbeite, lösche ich sowas.)

Viele Grüße und weiter viel Spaß bei osm 

Limes
KHFRT (2026-07-06 11:13:50+00:00): Hallo Limes,

vielen Dank für den Hinweis. Werde ich in der Zukunft versuchen direkt mit zu beachten.

Gruß
Alberto Stradiotto (2026-07-23 10:03:07+00:00): il divieto di transito è per mezzi con altezza superiore a m 4,40. Perchè è stata inserita MaxHeight 4?
TrickyFoxy (2026-07-04 10:34:24+00:00): 👋 Не вносите личные заметки в OpenStreetMap. Используйте раздел Метки в приложении
maro21 (2026-07-12 22:36:07+00:00): Nie wpisujemy do pola name= opisów, tak jak tu wpisałeś "name = budowa". Jeśli budynek jest w budowie, to należy wyszukać preset "budynek w budowie" i taki dodać. Proszę o poprawę poniższych:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1535167419
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1535167420
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1535167421
Константин Гам (2026-07-28 10:35:42+00:00): И тут "Гипер Ленту" сделали несуществующим магазином "Лента". Уже 2 года как, магазина с таким названием нет. Сеть чётко разделила свои магазины...
DressyPear4 (2026-07-07 12:35:58+00:00): Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/185262855