piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
iandees (2026-04-13 18:34:14+00:00): Hi! It looks like the website URL on way/141709937 may have been copied from Google Maps (it contained Google tracking parameters). Please be careful not to copy information from Google into OpenStreetMap, as Google's data is copyrighted.
fortera_au (2026-04-13 22:49:58+00:00): The service ways at the petrol station have been drawn incorrectly, there shouldn't be two separate ways for a single piece of undivided roadway.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181286240
fortera_au (2026-04-13 22:50:22+00:00): Sorry, fast food not petrol station.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181286240
NeisBot (2026-04-13 17:15:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13719415289 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Mexican restaurant"

#MapWithoutSpam
Herman Lee (2026-04-14 14:15:37+00:00): 此修改集已退回
NeisBot (2026-04-13 17:21:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13719602097 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Outdoor furniture store"

#MapWithoutSpam
eggie (2026-04-13 17:47:58+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback De toegangsweg naar het tankstation staat op access=customers. Misschien om een voorkeursroute te verkrijgen via de hoofdrijbaan.
Dit heeft meer dan twee jaar op slot gestaan?
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
haggyman (2026-04-13 17:56:03+00:00): Dank je wel voor je bericht. Ik ben vrij nieuw in deze wereld en gebruik Openstreetmap ook nog niet zo lang. Het was me al weel heel snel opgevallen dat hier iets raars aan de hand was, maar wist niet of ik daar iets aan kon doen. 
Het deel dat ik nu aangepast heb is de hoofdrijbaan (Rodenrijseweg). Dat de uitrit van het tankstation hierop uitkomt, staat daar verder los van. Doordat dit stukje Rodenrijseweg niet als rijbaan geschikt voor auto's was aangemerkt was het effectief niet mogelijk voor de navigatie om deze weg als doorgang te gebruiken. Dit resulteert in een behoorlijke omweg. Waarom dit 2 jaar geleden zo aangepast is, is mij een raadsel.
eggie (2026-04-13 18:03:10+00:00): Zelfs drie jaar geleden in deze changeset.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129372778#map=15/51.97910/4.45532
Mij ook een raadsel.
Wanneer iets op =no wordt gezet valt niet echt op.
Mapper heeft inmiddels geen account meer en meerdere malen geblokkeerd door de DataWorkingGroup (DWG) en heeft meermaals z'n account gewijzigd. 
Dus goede actie en scherp gezien. 

Mapse,
eggie
eggie (2026-04-13 18:05:57+00:00): motor_vehicle=yes heb ik wel verwijderd. dat is default op wegen.
haggyman (2026-04-13 18:08:02+00:00): Dank je wel! Ben blij dat ik er achter ben gekomen hoe ik dit op kon lossen en zal zeker blijven mappen waar dat nodig is ;).
haggyman (2026-04-13 18:11:05+00:00): Lijkt me inderdaad het meest logisch om de default aan te houden. Dank je wel voor de verbetering.
Dimitar155 (2026-04-17 19:59:23+00:00): Благодаря за промяната!

Детската градина е отбелязана веднъж чрез amenity=kindergarten, като върху същия обект се отбелязва и името ѝ. Върху сградата е достатъчно да има building=kindergarten. Коригирах обектите, така че да следват този принцип.

Поздрави,
Митко
hfs (2026-05-18 06:16:09+00:00): Wrong brand selected. It had to be fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181975877
Szymson (2026-06-06 19:45:48+00:00): O co chodzi z tym punktem?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13728042864
Salon samochodowy na parkingu Auchan?
Szymson (2026-06-06 19:55:57+00:00): Dobra, mam:
https://grupamakurat.pl/kontakt/rumia/
NeisBot (2026-04-13 17:24:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13721582878 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Liquor store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisBot (2026-04-13 17:27:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13720988241 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Medical spa"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisBot (2026-04-13 17:30:41+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 23 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1499043549 v1 | 5 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1499043548 v1 | 5 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1494904138 v6 | 4 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/13697340452 v2
https://osm.org/node/13697340453 v2
https://osm.org/node/13727587429 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=181287093
Herman Lee (2026-04-14 14:15:23+00:00): 此修改集已退回
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-14 14:17:54+00:00): Thanks @Herman%20Lee 👍

Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181325191
NeisBot (2026-04-13 17:33:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13727656706 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Pizza restaurant"

#MapWithoutSpam
FroschForscher (2026-04-29 16:32:59+00:00): Hallo OF-1,
die "Regenrückhaltebecken" auf  Gelände der Kläranlage Erbach sehen auf Luftbildern nicht nach Regenrückhaltebecken sondern nach man_made=clarifier/man_made=oxidation_ditch aus.

FroschForscher
OF-1 (2026-04-30 11:22:08+00:00): Hallo FroschForscher,
Danke für den Hinweis. Das sind natürlich keine Rückhaltebecken. Habe es abgeändert.

Grüße
OF-1
NeisBot (2026-04-13 17:51:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 52 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1499043549 v2 | 8 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1499043548 v2 | 7 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1499109337 v1 | 4 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=181287965
Herman Lee (2026-04-14 14:13:23+00:00): 此修改集已退回
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-14 14:16:47+00:00): Thanks @Herman%20Lee 👍 

Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181325191
Herman Lee (2026-04-14 14:15:02+00:00): 此修改集已退回
NeisBot (2026-04-13 18:00:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 45 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1499043549 v3 | 8 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1499043548 v3 | 7 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1499109341 v2 | 4 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=181288277
Herman Lee (2026-04-14 14:14:55+00:00): 此修改集已退回
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-14 14:17:28+00:00): Thanks @Herman%20Lee 👍

Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181325191
Herman Lee (2026-04-14 14:14:48+00:00): 此修改集已退回
ManuelB701 (2026-05-04 21:05:20+00:00): Hallo Otto,

nur so zu Info, Schäfer's befindet sich in einem neuen Gebäude und das, was du eingezeichnet hast, war der Umriss des ehemaligen Autohändlers.
Vergleich das Bild, was ich damals aufgenommen hatte: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sch%C3%A4fer_Dein_B%C3%A4cker_in_Oppenheim.jpg

Viele Grüße
Manuel
mueschel (2026-04-21 13:44:31+00:00): Hi,
are you sure about this node? It's in a strange place and also has a strange tag.
Zorororo (2026-04-22 13:08:35+00:00): Hello mueschel,
Thank you for reaching out to me about this address point. Based on the most updated imagery I have access to, it looks like there is a building footprint at this location. I will add it in and transfer the tags to the building polygon. If you have local knowledge about this location I will of course defer to you.
Best,
Zorororo
yelisey90 (2026-04-13 19:47:24+00:00): Two 99ვ ავთო ვარაზის ქუჩა - is that correct?
Frans S (2026-04-18 10:48:32+00:00): Thanks for mapping on this project.
I am afraid that you misinterpreted the possible damage to buildings.
I changed > 10 buildings from damaged/destroyed to 'damage=no.' 
The rusty corrugated roof plates can be confused. Take a look at the instructions, please.
Best regards, and keep mapping
NeisBot (2026-04-13 18:27:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13699577631 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Frank N Lola’s restaurant"

#MapWithoutSpam
Herman Lee (2026-04-14 14:14:41+00:00): 此修改集已退回
MappingMore (2026-04-14 17:19:38+00:00): Partially Revert of 181241609
FajrAl (2026-04-15 00:37:21+00:00): Hapus hashtag ini mending pakai overpass
Herman Lee (2026-04-14 14:14:34+00:00): 此修改集已退回
NieWnen (2026-06-09 20:26:01+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1499120036

Cześć,
tagowanie CPR jest nieco inne, używa się highway=path
Zachęcam do zapoznania się z wiki jak tagować ciągi pieszo-rowerowe:

osm.wiki/Pl:Rowery#Drogi_dla_pieszych_i_rower%C3%B3w
Herman Lee (2026-04-14 14:14:23+00:00): 此修改集已退回
NeisBot (2026-04-13 18:36:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13699447297 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Marina boat storage"

#MapWithoutSpam
Herman Lee (2026-04-14 14:14:16+00:00): 此修改集已退回
Strubbl (2026-04-28 15:21:27+00:00): Hi Georg, URLs zu Bildern sollten keine Leerzeichen enthalten. Man müsste die entweder url-encoden oder bei Commons kann man statt der Leerzeichen einfach Unterstriche nehmen. Dann sind die hier auch im Objekt direkt anklickbar: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4536454507
NeisBot (2026-04-13 18:54:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13720790771 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Bowling center"

#MapWithoutSpam
LordGarySugar (2026-05-09 02:24:08+00:00): railway=abandoned shouldn't be tagged on nodes, just abandoned:railway=junction is fine (or delete them seeing as these junctions don't exist anymore) :)
HiddeWie (2026-05-09 08:51:08+00:00): Thank you for the comment, I will correct this.
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-14 08:25:18+00:00): Hi @chris66,

beim nächsten Revert wäre es schön, wenn ein Kommentar beim zurückgesetzten Changeset hinterlassen werden könnte.

Dann würde zumindest ich mir das fragwürdige Changeset erst gar nicht mehr anschauen ...

Danke und viele Grüße
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-14 08:25:32+00:00): Hi @chris66,

beim nächsten Revert wäre es schön, wenn ein Kommentar beim zurückgesetzten Changeset hinterlassen werden könnte.

Dann würde zumindest ich mir das fragwürdige Changeset erst gar nicht mehr anschauen ...

Danke und viele Grüße
eggie (2026-04-13 19:16:39+00:00): Welkom bij OSM,
Bedankt voor de bijdrage.
Bij zo'n automaat hoort
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:vending
vending=....;....;....
opening_hours vind je hier
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours
operator=   de uitbater.. Niet die hele opsomming.. Die hoort onder vending=

Ik heb het iets aangepast naar description (kan korter) en de ref aangepast naar operator.

MVG
eggie
NeisBot (2026-04-13 19:00:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13480415656 v5

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Meat products store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisAgent (2026-04-13 22:33:12+00:00): 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again?
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-01 11:41:28+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags/values

https://osm.org/changeset/184909253
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-14 08:25:40+00:00): Hi @chris66,

beim nächsten Revert wäre es schön, wenn ein Kommentar beim zurückgesetzten Changeset hinterlassen werden könnte.

Dann würde zumindest ich mir das fragwürdige Changeset erst gar nicht mehr anschauen ...

Danke und viele Grüße
NeisBot (2026-04-13 19:03:46+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/2845993655 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Houtverkoop"
---
Bijvoorbeeld, een meer neutrale en feitelijke versie van je tekst kon zijn: "Houtverkoop"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
eggie (2026-04-13 19:19:51+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
De description is te lang en wordt behandeld als spam.
opening_hours=  kan gebruikt worden voor de openingstijden.
shop=???  yes  evt gebruiken om de naam te laten renderen.
Maar of dit echt een winkel is blijft natuurlijk de vraag.

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-04-13 19:26:06+00:00): phone=+31  is een aparte tag
NeisBot (2026-04-13 19:03:49+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13719580474 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Insurance agency"

#MapWithoutSpam
Frans S (2026-04-22 10:05:15+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please read the instructions on where to tag a road as a track.
the connection from a building to a nearby road is never a track.
Best regards
NeisBot (2026-04-13 19:12:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/5218183923 v7

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Boutique store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisBot (2026-04-13 19:15:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13721143913 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Bakery"

#MapWithoutSpam
felipeeugenio (2026-04-13 21:22:33+00:00): Hola. Entiendo que esta es una tarea que les asignaron. De qué universidad?
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181291265
NeisBot (2026-04-13 19:26:19+00:00): 🌍 Welcome to OSM, Bryan Dotson Houston.
Thanks for contributing!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

✅ Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Removed TIGER import attributes from way"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment
NeisBot (2026-04-13 19:27:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 17 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1499128974 v1 | 17 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=181291466
John Aizle (2026-04-14 14:06:37+00:00): There are now tree icons across farmland South of Elsecar, needs reverting.
NeisRevert (2026-04-14 14:10:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/181325023
where the comment is: "Revert unclear map edits"
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-14 14:13:21+00:00): @John%20Aizle 👍
eggie (2026-04-13 20:10:26+00:00): Formeel is het pas 30 na het verkeersbord of de mededeling op het wegdek. 
Gr eggie
haggyman (2026-04-14 08:51:36+00:00): Je hebt helemaal gelijk, ik zal het aanpassen naar 50 aangezien dit wegdeel precies buiten de 30 km/h zone bevindt.
Leo Slager (2026-04-14 11:31:19+00:00): Dag Raymond,

Voor bus 36 en tram 19 werd een foutmelding ontvangen voor de volgorde van de stop_positions.
Die routerelaties heb ik gerepareerd.

Even voor mijn nieuwsgierigheid, heb je soms inside information voor het Amsterdamse lijnennet ?

Voor de foutmeldingen kun je OSM insëctor raadplegen:
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=4.95206&lat=52.39145&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.78&overlays=ptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes

Veel succes met verder mappen.
met vriendelijke groet
Leo
Leo Slager (2026-04-24 22:21:19+00:00): Jammer dat je niet reageert.

Voor een ieder van ons geldt dat je van je fouten kunt leren.
Als je geen hulp wilt, blijf je dus fouten maken.
En dat zou jammer zijn.

Let wel, we nemen je niets kwalijk.

Groet
Leo
habi (2026-04-14 08:57:37+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13728329901 is most probably named incorrectly, as the village name is mapped here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1599253225
Nationalpark Sächsische Schweiz (2026-04-14 05:35:25+00:00): Hallo! Ich habe eine Anmerkung/Frage hierzu: Die Bergpfade sind keine Kletterzustiege. Es sind eher etwas anspruchsvollere Wanderwege (bzw. im Fall vom Gehackten Weg und Hintergründel oder auch dem Oberen Fremdenweg nicht mal wirklich anspruchsvoll). Auf jeden Fall sind es markierte Wege, was ja besonders hier innerhalb der Kernzone relevant ist. Wäre es da nicht sinnvoll, die Relationen beizubehalten? Die Bergpfade beschreiben ja trotzdem eine Route oder Verbindung (den Bergpfad am Luchsstein könnte man vielleicht als Rundweg sehen, das Hintergründel verbindet Königsweg über Marienhöhle zum Gehackten Weg etc.). Meines Erachtens wäre es sinnvoll, die Bergpfade auch weiterhin in Relationen zu haben, damit deutlich ist, dass es sich um markierte Wege handelt. Vielleicht müssen die Relationen nur anders getaggt/anders strukturiert werden? Die anderen Bergpfade sind ja im Moment auch immer noch in Relationen drin.

Viele Grüße
lonvia (2026-04-14 07:04:18+00:00): Ah, gibt es da inzwischen einen Unterschied zwischen schwarzen und grünen Dreieck? Dann würde ich das wieder herstellen, aber im Bereich Affensteine mit echten Routen.
lonvia (2026-04-14 07:34:48+00:00): Leicht umsotiert wieder hergestellt in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181307808

Über die Namen könnte man noch diskutieren. Offiziell sind vermutlich nur die unterliegenden Wege benannt.