piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ciaoQuentin (2023-10-31 17:07:18+00:00): C'est peut-être une erreur de ma part. Je retournerai voir. L'espace est en train de changer, ils ont enlevé des voix de tram, et refait l’asphalte à plusieurs endroits.
Syl (2024-01-25 21:48:47+00:00): J'ai vérifié sur place, il n'y a plus de pointillés mais le sol du passage est différent du reste de la chaussée.
Je viens de corriger.
bad_mapper (2023-07-15 10:39:19+00:00): Добрый день! Без "бесполезного" тега area=yes получается, что можно ходить только по краю. Можете попробовать:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_foot&route=53.93478%2C27.64987%3B53.93416%2C27.64822#map=19/53.93444/27.64929
silversurfer83 (2023-05-31 07:14:00+00:00): Gude :)
Zu deiner Baustelle ein Hinweis:
Die Gebäude sind alle noch auf dem NRW Luftbild zu sehen. Klar, der Baustellenumriss ist ein Hinweis, dass die weg sein könnten, jedoch kann trotzdem morgen der nächste am PC sitzen und denken, "hey, da feheln doch ein Haufen Gebäude an der Kölner Straße! Auf dem Luftbild sind sie ja!". Daher empfehle ich immer mit Nachdruck die Verwendung von https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix
Dann bleiben die Umrisse noch in der Datenbank werden aber nicht mehr von den üblichen Karten angezeigt. Vielleicht auch noch eine "note=abgerissen für Neugestaltung Ortsmitte" dran und wenn die Luftbilder in ein paar Jahren aktuell sind können die Objekte gelöscht werden.

Dann noch der Name der Baustelle: Steht der auf dem Baustellenschild? Wenn nicht bitte in "description=*" oder "note=*" verschieben.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen

Cheers
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136764500
EditHrdrf (2023-05-31 17:53:11+00:00): Danke für die Hinweise. Die Namen sind korrigiert. Ich habe die Gebäude jetzt nicht extra wieder eingefügt, aber setze entsprechende Keys, sollte dies jemand tun.
silversurfer83 (2023-05-31 19:29:04+00:00): Hi
Danke für die Rückmeldung :)

Habe mir deine Änderung mal angesehen: Gefährlich. Das PDF sieht mir auf den ersten Blick nicht so aus wie eine erlaubte Quelle. Da wird uns der Archtiekt einen Husten, denke ich.
Wir dürfen nur Dinge eintragen, die wir selbst beobachtet haben oder die wir vom Besitzer der Information zur Verfügung gestellt bekommen. Die Luftbilder, die wir als Hintergrund einstellen können: Alles wunderbar.
Das PDF: Vermutlich eher nicht.

Fazit: Das ist sehr gut gemeint von dir, kann aber Ärger geben. Die Baustelle ist kein Problem, aber die proposed Gebäude mit dem PDF als Quelle, das muss wieder weg, sorry.
bergaufsee (2024-04-24 17:40:25+00:00): Hallo, kannst du bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4179607 helfen? Du hast den Hydrant seinerzeit eingetragen. Auf Bing ist dort zwar ein Fleck erkennbar, denke aber eher, das ist ein Gullydeckel.
Tomas_J (2026-07-24 20:47:26+00:00): Cus, tu (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5300030686) ma byt crossing:island=no, ak su ciary ostrovceka iba nakreslene (ostrovcek nie je fyzicky oddeleny)?
aceman444 (2026-07-24 23:15:20+00:00): Neviem, kde je to definovane?
Tomas_J (2026-07-25 06:00:59+00:00): Tak asi je jedno či je ostrovček iba namalovaný alebo aj fyzicky oddeleny od vozovky obrubníkmi. Osm Wiki odkazuje na Wikipédiu, kde je definované, že dopravný ostrovček môže byť aj namaľovaný, bez fyzickeho oddelenia.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Traffic_island
aceman444 (2026-07-25 13:32:29+00:00): Ok, takze to asi mozme zatial nechat ako je s 'yes'.
Glassman (2023-05-31 21:35:31+00:00): Unfortunately there are no living streets in the US as defined by OSM. This looks like a service road. Can you review this and update as needed? Thanks.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136764799
user_5359 (2023-05-31 03:57:43+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice: the minimum keys for an address is addr:street and addr:housenumber! Can you add the value for the house number, please?
olo81 (2023-06-03 00:31:35+00:00): zdublowana nazwa, należy ją przenieść do obszaru amenity albo skasować 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/227234217
mariotomo (2023-05-31 09:32:18+00:00): I'm not sure this edit was really fixing connectivity.
I've interpreted that open area as a soccer field, and have added path segments inside the pitch.
changeset:136780226
smaptious (2023-05-31 19:53:33+00:00): Hi Mariotomo, thanks for the updates. I agree with your changes. Happy Mapping!
NorthCrab_upload (2023-05-30 23:10:14+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10940775226

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
user_5359 (2023-06-02 18:58:36+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please take a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1177704972. What is the mean of the tag highway = 1 (in combination with the tag building=house)?
mueschel (2023-05-31 17:43:10+00:00): Hi,
welcome to OSM!
I have a couple of comments to your edits:
- the "name" tag is only for the actual name of an object. Please don't use it for descriptions like "name = HOGAR".
- Please use only tags that are available as presets in your editor, don't invent your own ones.
- you and your group added many tags like "Identificadopr", "identificador", "Identificador" or "IDENTIFICADOR". If this a usefull tag for OSM, please make sure you use only one spelling.
- don't add your own name to objects.

As it seems, this is a group project. Please make sure that the leader of this project is aware of our Organised Editing Guidelines:
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines
jmarchon (2023-05-31 05:47:26+00:00): Looks good to me! Welcome to OSM!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136766380
mueschel (2023-05-31 17:43:22+00:00): Hi,
welcome to OSM!
I have a couple of comments to your edits:
- the "name" tag is only for the actual name of an object. Please don't use it for descriptions like "name = HOGAR".
- Please use only tags that are available as presets in your editor, don't invent your own ones.
- you and your group added many tags like "Identificadopr", "identificador", "Identificador" or "IDENTIFICADOR". If this a usefull tag for OSM, please make sure you use only one spelling.
- don't add your own name to objects.

As it seems, this is a group project. Please make sure that the leader of this project is aware of our Organised Editing Guidelines:
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines
mueschel (2023-05-31 17:43:44+00:00): Hi,
welcome to OSM!
I have a couple of comments to your edits:
- the "name" tag is only for the actual name of an object. Please don't use it for descriptions like "name = HOGAR".
- Please use only tags that are available as presets in your editor, don't invent your own ones.
- you and your group added many tags like "Identificadopr", "identificador", "Identificador" or "IDENTIFICADOR". If this a usefull tag for OSM, please make sure you use only one spelling.
- don't add your own name to objects.

As it seems, this is a group project. Please make sure that the leader of this project is aware of our Organised Editing Guidelines:
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines
mueschel (2023-05-31 17:42:21+00:00): Hi,
welcome to OSM!
I have a couple of comments to your edits:
- the "name" tag is only for the actual name of an object. Please don't use it for descriptions like "name = HOGAR".
- Please use only tags that are available as presets in your editor, don't invent your own ones.
- you and your group added many tags like "Identificadopr", "identificador", "Identificador" or "IDENTIFICADOR". If this a usefull tag for OSM, please make sure you use only one spelling.
- don't add your own name to objects.

As it seems, this is a group project. Please make sure that the leader of this project is aware of our Organised Editing Guidelines:
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines
mueschel (2023-05-31 17:42:42+00:00): Hi,
welcome to OSM!
I have a couple of comments to your edits:
- the "name" tag is only for the actual name of an object. Please don't use it for descriptions like "name = HOGAR".
- Please use only tags that are available as presets in your editor, don't invent your own ones.
- you and your group added many tags like "Identificadopr", "identificador", "Identificador" or "IDENTIFICADOR". If this a usefull tag for OSM, please make sure you use only one spelling.
- don't add your own name to objects.

As it seems, this is a group project. Please make sure that the leader of this project is aware of our Organised Editing Guidelines:
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines
mueschel (2023-05-31 17:42:51+00:00): Hi,
welcome to OSM!
I have a couple of comments to your edits:
- the "name" tag is only for the actual name of an object. Please don't use it for descriptions like "name = HOGAR".
- Please use only tags that are available as presets in your editor, don't invent your own ones.
- you and your group added many tags like "Identificadopr", "identificador", "Identificador" or "IDENTIFICADOR". If this a usefull tag for OSM, please make sure you use only one spelling.
- don't add your own name to objects.

As it seems, this is a group project. Please make sure that the leader of this project is aware of our Organised Editing Guidelines:
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines
mueschel (2023-05-31 17:42:46+00:00): Hi,
welcome to OSM!
I have a couple of comments to your edits:
- the "name" tag is only for the actual name of an object. Please don't use it for descriptions like "name = HOGAR".
- Please use only tags that are available as presets in your editor, don't invent your own ones.
- you and your group added many tags like "Identificadopr", "identificador", "Identificador" or "IDENTIFICADOR". If this a usefull tag for OSM, please make sure you use only one spelling.
- don't add your own name to objects.

As it seems, this is a group project. Please make sure that the leader of this project is aware of our Organised Editing Guidelines:
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines
mueschel (2023-05-31 17:43:04+00:00): Hi,
welcome to OSM!
I have a couple of comments to your edits:
- the "name" tag is only for the actual name of an object. Please don't use it for descriptions like "name = HOGAR".
- Please use only tags that are available as presets in your editor, don't invent your own ones.
- you and your group added many tags like "Identificadopr", "identificador", "Identificador" or "IDENTIFICADOR". If this a usefull tag for OSM, please make sure you use only one spelling.
- don't add your own name to objects.

As it seems, this is a group project. Please make sure that the leader of this project is aware of our Organised Editing Guidelines:
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines
mueschel (2023-05-31 17:42:49+00:00): Hi,
welcome to OSM!
I have a couple of comments to your edits:
- the "name" tag is only for the actual name of an object. Please don't use it for descriptions like "name = HOGAR".
- Please use only tags that are available as presets in your editor, don't invent your own ones.
- you and your group added many tags like "Identificadopr", "identificador", "Identificador" or "IDENTIFICADOR". If this a usefull tag for OSM, please make sure you use only one spelling.
- don't add your own name to objects.

As it seems, this is a group project. Please make sure that the leader of this project is aware of our Organised Editing Guidelines:
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines
jbcharron (2023-05-31 17:16:45+00:00): Merci pour tes contributions sur la partie réseau électrique, pour info pas de R majuscules à réséda :)
user_5359 (2023-05-31 03:58:01+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice: the minimum keys for an address is addr:street and addr:housenumber! Can you add the value for the house number, please?
user_5359 (2023-06-01 05:20:38+00:00): Welcome to OSM! What is the meaning of the tag CREADOR=CRISTOFER - UPE. Please notice also the difference between name and description. Not every word has the name ARBOLITO.
mueschel (2023-06-02 09:01:40+00:00): Hi,
welcome to OSM!
I have a couple of comments to your edits:
- the "name" tag is only for the actual name of an object. Please don't use it for descriptions like "name = HOGAR".
- Please use only tags that are available as presets in your editor, don't invent your own ones.
- you and your group added many tags like "Identificadopr", "identificador", "Identificador" or "IDENTIFICADOR". If this a usefull tag for OSM, please make sure you use only one spelling.
- don't add your own name to objects.

As it seems, this is a group project. Please make sure that the leader of this project is aware of our Organised Editing Guidelines:
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines
iandees (2023-05-31 02:41:48+00:00): It's great to see that you're improving the data. Please try to use actual OpenStreetMap tags, though. "Category" is not a valid tag. If you want to work with us to figure out how to tag garage door shops, please let us know!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136767376
CurlingMan13 (2024-02-07 22:55:36+00:00): FYI, your changeset was reverted without duscussion by a different user...

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145718903

I agree with you.  Based on lifecycle tags, they either shouldn't be mapped or should be tagged as razed since abandoned only applies to locations where the rails still exist, and based on multiple roads and the buildings that now exist where these "abandoned" railways exist, I think it is safe to say there is nothing remaining that resembles a railway in some portions.
MxxCon (2023-05-31 05:40:21+00:00): Hello.
Perhaps it's better to leave these ways in place and instead tag them as "access=no" or "access=emergency"?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136767708
silversurfer83 (2023-05-31 07:19:43+00:00): Moin
Was genau hast du hier vor?
Dein Account ist nagelneu und du trägst 10k nodes pro Änderung ein. Warte bitte mit neuen Änderungen und erzähl bitte zunächst, was du erreichen möchtest. Danke

silversurfer83
opendcc (2023-06-01 07:16:40+00:00): Es sind quasi maschinell erzeugte Admingrenzen, die aber schon in OSM vorhanden sind. Deshalb habe ich zeitnah einen revert gemacht. Und vielleicht bekommen wir noch eine Erklärung.
silversurfer83 (2023-06-01 07:20:55+00:00): Danke. Denke, dass das erstmal richtig ist.
Aber warum nur nodes ohne tags? 
Bin gespannt, ob da eine Erklärung kommt
opendcc (2023-06-01 07:29:53+00:00): Mit dem letzten CS wurden die Nodes dann verbunden, MPs gebaut und als area 'Allgäu' o.ä. bezeichnet.
tastrax (2023-06-01 01:19:19+00:00): I have updated these individual buildings. generally you only need the full address on one building (or node which I have also added). I think the main building is a reception and cafe/restaurant which I will update after a visit.
Wombat_____ (2023-06-01 02:01:52+00:00): Thank you! yep, the main building to the north is the reception and the southern building is the restaurant/ cafe and convention space.  Thanks for your help
GITNE (2023-07-18 08:43:29+00:00): Woher soll der Name „Andachtsplatz“ kommen? Warst du vor Ort? Wo hast du ein Schild oder eine Beschriftung gesehen?

Des weiteren, es ist nicht notwendig einen weiteren Knoten hinzu zu fügen, wenn am selben Ort ein anderer mit bereits anderen Merkmalen vorhanden ist. Man ergänzt den bestehenden Knoten. Bitte die Datenbank nicht zu müllen.
Mashin (2023-06-01 19:33:13+00:00): I think this all looks great. Thanks!
Supaplex (2023-05-31 03:13:59+00:00): 可以在 iD 介面的增加欄位那邊，找到 Wikidata 的欄位，再打中文校名，應該就可以找到對應的 Wikidata 項目 QID
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136767930
watmildon (2025-03-06 05:08:12+00:00): Really crisp great work here. Keep it up!
mariotomo (2023-06-04 05:24:27+00:00): hi. What is this changeset about? Please check 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136768070
Frans S (2023-05-31 14:21:01+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
A short comment.
When a building you map, crosses a road, don't add a -1 layer to that building, but move the road a bit aside, 
Best regards
opendcc (2023-05-31 04:32:52+00:00): Doppelte Eintragung von Admin-Boundaries - Diskussion siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136768265
opendcc (2023-05-31 04:31:39+00:00): Guten Tag, die von Dir eingezeichneten Grenzen gibt es bereits. Was wolltest Du mit der doppelten Eintragung bezwecken?
opendcc (2023-05-31 04:56:39+00:00): Da es offensichtlich doppelte Daten waren - Changeset wurde reverted.
Frans S (2023-05-31 09:51:36+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator.
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
A: * Multiple buildings has been drawn as 1 building. Each building need to be mapped individually, without connecting nodes.
E: Most buildings are fair rectangular. Square them with the Q key when the object is selected.
* When buildings have protruding elements, they should be included into your mappings.




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136768396
Frans S (2023-05-31 08:09:41+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
Use the correct Imagery (Maxar Premium) for this project.
Use of residential area. Don't map small areas as a residential area. A whole village, settlement of town  can be mapped as 1 residential area.
Each building need to be mapped individually and Squared with the Q key.
Don't connect nodes of buildings to each other or other features.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136768531
Frans S (2023-05-31 08:27:52+00:00): Hello. 
Please stop mapping like this. Your mappings are not correct and incorrect.
See my comments on another changeset.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136768531
Frans S (2023-05-31 08:01:45+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 
Just a few remarks:
E: Most buildings are fair rectangular. Square them with the Q key when the object is selected.
* When buildings have protruding elements, they should be included into your mappings.
D: Please avoid that nodes of buildings link to other buildings or roads.
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136768547
Stretch Longfellow (2024-04-03 13:01:51+00:00): Could you explain this edit, please? You seem to have added some trunk spurs, which does not mesh with OSM standards, and why was the link dropped?
Joseph R P (2024-04-03 14:56:41+00:00): I don't believe I created any trunk spurs in this edit, but rather eliminated the trunk stub by downgrading the trunk route to the ramps. It might be easier to see what I did in ID.
Stretch Longfellow (2024-04-03 15:41:45+00:00): I'm using iD. There was no trunk route to the ramps previously, just a trunk_link. 4th Corso is now a trunk. I'm going to go ahead and clean this up.
Joseph R P (2024-04-03 17:59:00+00:00): I'm probably misremembering what edits I made here since it was almost a year ago, looking at it now it looks like I didn't eliminate any trunk stubs, but I didn't create any either. I created a trunk connection from NE 2 east to link to the US 75 north ramp and one from the US 75 south ramp to connect to NE 2 west.
Glassman (2023-05-31 21:43:12+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136768965
jnighan (2023-07-16 20:06:08+00:00): Hi, Mike. Exceptions to the ConnDOT functional classifications are needed to prevent classification 'dead-ends,' which are contrary to an interconnected road network. These exceptions must be listed in the OSM Connecticut/Highway classification document (linked below).
jnighan (2023-07-16 20:07:01+00:00): By undoing two of the documented exceptions, you created three dead ends, you created three dead ends: a dangling secondary classification on Bridge Street, and two dangling primary classifications on CT-190.
jnighan (2023-07-16 20:07:44+00:00): I've restored those roads to their previous mapping to provide connectivity with regards to the networks of primary roads and secondary roads.
jnighan (2023-07-16 20:07:51+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Connecticut/Highway_classification
jnighan (2023-07-16 20:09:22+00:00): Any changes to the classification specified in that page should be based on consensus and ideally discussed in the # local-connecticut Slack channel.
Glassman (2023-05-31 21:44:37+00:00): Addresses are broken into segments in OSM. Housenumber, street, city, unit, etc. Use the editor to help. Can you update this address?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136769436
Glassman (2023-05-31 21:51:56+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136769632
Glassman (2023-05-31 21:55:33+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136769632
Glassman (2023-05-31 21:47:06+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

The Grand Hyatt Seattle name is just that, Grand Hyatt Seattle. I fixed it.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136769665
Glassman (2023-05-31 21:53:27+00:00): #TIP: square the building by selecting the outline then just type a "q" - also building imagery often shows a peak but that can be caused by the angle of the satellite taking the imagery
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136769688
Glassman (2023-05-31 21:53:41+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136769713