piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
kapazao (2026-07-31 09:30:42+00:00): Hola, ¿de dónde viene el nombre "Acceso al Aeropuerto de Almería"?

No he visto en imágenes a pie de calle referencia alguna sobre ese nombre en todas las vías y en el Callejero Digital de Andalucía Unificado aparece como "Carretera N-347 de A-7 a N-344".

Si no indicas de dónde vienen tus cambios cualquier otro usuario puede revertirlos o modificar el nombre a su criterio de la misma forma, y entonces comenzamos guerras de ediciones absurdas, de ahí la necesidad de explicar bien lo que se hace y dar referencias.
Un saludo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186692495
kapazao (2026-07-31 09:31:23+00:00): No se dan referencias sobre el nombre añadido
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186692623
grzegorzmilosz (2026-07-31 08:46:16+00:00): https://www.tuolawa.pl/artykul/45929,z-olawy-do-jelcza-laskowic-wracamy-przez-minkowice-od-dzis
kapazao (2026-07-31 09:31:46+00:00): No se dan referencias sobre el nombre añadido ni la referencia cambiada
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186692962
OsterPaul (2026-07-31 08:55:34+00:00): Korrekter Änderungssatz Kommentar: Straßenverlauf angepasst
kapazao (2026-07-31 09:31:59+00:00): No se dan referencias sobre el cambio de nombre
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186693370
kapazao (2026-07-31 09:32:32+00:00): No se dan referencias sobre el nombre añadido
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186693783
felipeeugenio (2026-07-31 12:18:18+00:00): Hello. An unclassified bacame a footway? is that right?

regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186693922
felipeeugenio (2026-07-31 14:56:46+00:00): It is right, I checked- Thanks
Monolo23 (2026-07-31 14:25:37+00:00): Buenas,
¿Podrías explicar el motivo de traducir estos nombres?
Los añadí tras verificarlos sobre el terreno (on the ground). Los carteles muestran esos nombres exactamente, por lo que no entiendo el motivo de la traducción.
bxl-forever (2026-07-31 10:29:44+00:00): Hello.
Even if extra tracks are being built here, the "platform" should not be presented on the map as being open to passengers.
public_transport=platform should only be used on active stops, not here: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1546238149
Please fix this.
frydzio (2026-07-31 10:27:01+00:00): Hej,
Nie musimy dodawać tagów dotyczących dostępu z wartością 'no' jeśli nie ma stricte znaku zakazu. Silniki routingu powinny same znać domyślne zasady dostępu https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Poland
sykul (2026-07-31 10:29:00+00:00): <3
eggie (2026-07-31 10:43:30+00:00): Hoi,

Er staat hier al een bankje. Heb je dat nu eerst gecheckt op staan er twee bankjes naast elkaar? 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-07-31 10:45:01+00:00): Ik heb het bankje verwijderd. Dat was andere bankje had ik zelf toegevoegd.
Maar misschien staan er nu twee bankjes. Laat het even weten.
MVG
eggie
FajrAl (2026-07-31 17:18:01+00:00): Mohon jangan mengubah titik Desa Sungai Bedaun jadi sebuah toko kasur. Jika ingin memetakan toko, harap buat baru.

Suntingan ini telah dipulihkan https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186719345
ffff23 (2026-07-31 18:12:25+00:00): Hello,

I noticed that you have recently added a large number of AEDs around Kawasaki. The changesets are tagged with source=local knowledge, while many of the individual AED nodes have a source:url pointing to 「ガイドマップかわさき」 or 「財団全国AEDマップ」.

As far as I can tell, the terms of use of 「ガイドマップかわさき」 and 「財団全国AEDマップ」 do not appear to permit copying their data into OpenStreetMap. Therefore, I would like to ask whether these AEDs were added based on a survey or local knowledge, or whether the locations and other information were taken from 「ガイドマップかわさき」 or 「財団全国AEDマップ」.

You may also find the following page about acceptable data sources helpful:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Available_Data

----
original

こんにちは。

最近、川崎周辺で多くのAEDを追加されていますが、変更セットのsourceには「local knowledge」とある一方で、個別のAEDノードには（多くの場所で）source:urlとして「ガイドマップかわさき」や「財団全国AEDマップ」のURLが記載されています。

私が確認した限りでは、「ガイドマップかわさき」や「財団全国AEDマップ」の利用規約では、OpenStreetMapへの転記を許可しているようには読み取れませんでした。そのため、これらのAEDは現地調査や地元の知識に基づいて追加されたものなのか、それとも「ガイドマップかわさき」や「財団全国AEDマップ」を参照して位置や情報を入力されたものなのか、確認させていただければと思います。

利用可能なデータソースについては、こちらも参考になります。

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Available_Data
eggie (2026-07-31 10:28:19+00:00): Ook op het pad.. Ik heb hier onlangs bankjes toegevoegd?
Mvg,
eggie
eggie (2026-07-31 10:38:51+00:00): Maar wellicht zijn er bankjes bij gekomen.  Bankje naar zijkant verplaatst.
eggie (2026-07-31 10:26:28+00:00): Hi Jim... midden op het speelveld?
Mvg,
eggie
eggie (2026-07-31 10:41:54+00:00): Bankje(s)  naar de zijkant verplaatst
eggie (2026-07-31 10:47:37+00:00): Ik heb de indruk dat je met je moiel een bankje toevoegt. Dat is natuurlijk prima, maar als je dat doet met die app Mapsme kun je dan checken of er al een bankje staat?
Gr eggie
rempshaener (2026-07-31 21:28:26+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.
Du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Ich habe zwei Anmerkungen:
- Die Farbangabe erfolgt in englischer Schreibweise, also colour=red
- Je nachdem, ob aus dem Brunnen angesaugt werden muss oder eine Tiefenpumpe verbaut ist, sollte noch ein fire_hydrant:pressure=suction oder fire_hydrant:pressure=yes ergänzt werden.
Vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag und weiterhin viel Spaß beim Mappen.
Viele Grüße
bxl-forever (2026-07-31 10:46:54+00:00): Nice work… but please do not reuse tags from existing buildings.

ref:UrbIS is only found on buildings, this tag should not be used for something else.  I removed it.

Also, do not forget swimming_pool=outdoor to your edits, it helps a lot to query them correctly.
philippeserruys (2026-07-31 12:19:47+00:00): Hi 
The pool was wrongly drawn as a building, so i just changed towards pool. But i did not check the other attributes, sorry. The 4 or 5 other pools i added today were new geometries. 
Br, 
Philippe
no details provided here (2026-07-31 12:37:12+00:00): Thanks for these RHS updates. Are you able to confirm the 'under construction' status of roads there (they've been mapped like that for years now and no construction is visible from the main road)..? Thanks.
Loshu (2026-07-31 13:26:17+00:00): Wasn’t looking for them but didn’t notice anything on the West side of the play area.

Failed to find any online info about them.
Gitasaleh Virast (2026-07-31 10:43:51+00:00): و البته خط ۲۱۲ (بهشتی به امام حسین) هم بوده
eggie (2026-07-31 11:17:05+00:00): Welkom bij OSM,
Probeer svp bij te taggen op de bestaande adresnode op het gebouw.
Mvg,
eggie
eggie (2026-07-31 12:02:44+00:00): Info samengevoegd met adresnode
limes11 (2026-07-31 15:04:00+00:00): Bist du dir sicher bei shop=kiosk ?

Zumindest war das vor dem Umzug kein shop=kiosk im Sinne des Wikis. Was verkaufen die denn jetzt ?
TG-map4 (2026-07-31 18:43:49+00:00): Hi limes11,
you are once again too quick/over-enthusiastic 😅. As I said in the note, I was actually walking/on the ground, when I did this first quick-and-dirty edit with just my smartphone in my hands and tags that I know by heart without taking a further look in the wiki what could fit best. A correct refinement will come later when I'm back at my PC. Well, here I am. FYI, the "Klosterladen" is not at nr 3 anymore (where the note was). At that place, there is nothing anymore/only windows. It moved to the "Klostergärtnerei" in the same building, they now share one big sales area. The Klosterladen part is more at the beginning at the door, the Klostergärtnerei more at the left and further part of the building/outside. I moved everything accordingly. Regarding the tags: Yes, kiosk is wrong. I now tried "interior_decoration". There are mostly flower vases/pots/design stuff. If you have a better idea, just change it. I could also imagine "farm" or "convenience" (not really, but OSM Wiki says "Nachbarschaftsladen").
Best regards, TG-map4
kamilbogacki (2026-07-31 11:22:34+00:00): Zasięg seta wynika z tego, że większość miasta jest pokryta jednym dużym multipoligonem.
eggie (2026-07-31 11:53:15+00:00): Freek Je verwijderd belangrijke adresinfo. Waarom verwijder je al die adresnodes. Dan is een adres toch niet meer te vinden.
Haal svp gewoon de bedrijfsinfo van de adresnodes ipv alles verwijderen.

MVG
eggie
freek500 (2026-07-31 13:46:59+00:00): Ow stom niet goed gekeken
zal er op letten
Gr. Freek
eggie (2026-07-31 14:17:07+00:00): 👍
Szymson (2026-07-31 15:59:16+00:00): Po co wprowadzasz fałszywe informacje?
Szymson (2026-07-31 16:00:09+00:00): Tak, od jutra mądralo xD
Fraxi (2026-07-31 15:11:45+00:00): Може ли по-натам да начертаеш площ(по спомен) за фитнес площадката, обграждаща node/14063796147 и node/14063796122 и нея да отбележиш само с leisure=fitness_station а от тези 2 възела да махнеш leisure=fitness_station и да оставиш само тези допълнителни тагове(указващи, че става дума за лост и успоредка)? Или са отделни? А ако не си сигурен в очертанията, можеш да сложиш fixme=outlines.
Fraxi (2026-07-31 15:13:16+00:00): На мен ми е трудно с наличните снимки да направя нещо.
Kaloan-koko (2026-07-31 17:57:13+00:00): Ами то няма очертания.
Просто на едно място в земята има лост и близо до него успоредка.
Само е малко по-отъпкана земята около тях. Не е като типичен street fitness с различно покритие на земята.
Dimitar155 (2026-07-31 18:51:50+00:00): Схемата за тагване на тези обекти е малко куца и това дава отражение в рендъра тук.

За справка https://github.com/openstreetmap-carto/openstreetmap-carto/issues/5278
Fraxi (2026-07-31 19:07:53+00:00): Еми то в примера, който си дал в Холандия, този, който е тагнал отделните уреди(fitness equipment), е добавил и leisure=fitness_station, а аз мисля, че не е нужно. То затова се показва на рендера. Ако го нямаше този таг, нямаше да се показва. Но по принцип на Carto отделните уреди не се показват. Нали така?
Dimitar155 (2026-07-31 19:49:47+00:00): Да, ако няма leisure=fitness_station няма да се показват. Въпроса е че са решили и площта и отделните уреди да имат един и същ таг. Поради тази причина и шаблоните в уеб редактора са такива.
Fraxi (2026-07-31 20:04:39+00:00): Как са решили, бе, човек(ще прощаваш, вечер е и е топло...)? Виж:
The tag fitness_station=* is added to describe the type of exercise equipment WITHIN a leisure=fitness_station. 

От https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:fitness_station
Никъде в тази страница не виждам задължение да се вписва и leisure=fitness_station. Пише вдясно useful combination

А от главната страница(май и ти това си цитирал) пише:Each individual fitness device and feature within the fitness station area should be mapped individually as a separate node node with an additional fitness_station=<equipment_type> tag.

Пак "within". 
Е аз пък не съм съгласен с imagico. Напълно нормално и логично е. И съпоставимо с детските площадки...
Dimitar155 (2026-07-31 20:30:34+00:00): with an additional fitness_station=<equipment_type> tag.

го чета като leisure=fitness_station + fitness_station=*. В този ред на мисли, двете страници си противоречат, тъй като втората казва друго. В дискусията там също е повдигнато като въпрос (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:leisure%3Dfitness_station#How_to_tag/map_types_of_equipment?).

Иначе не споря че е не е окей да е така.
Fraxi (2026-07-31 20:36:53+00:00): Прегледах дискусията междувременно и някакъв mailing list. Направо... без коментар.
spiregrain (2026-07-31 13:58:15+00:00): Thanks my 6 year old typo you just fixed!  Thank you!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186701995
eggie (2026-07-31 12:52:00+00:00): Dag RvE,
Je vraagt feedback  Je tekent over de brug een nieuw voetpad. Dat heten duplicated ways en dat routeert niet correct.
Dat pad op die brug hoort er niet.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-07-31 13:02:19+00:00): De brug heb ik verwijderd. Die tags horen in het pad.
RvE5422 (2026-07-31 14:53:58+00:00): Ik ga alle feedback doornemen en aanpassingen maken. Ik moet nog veel leren zie ik wel, maar het is leuk om te doen! Dankjewel Eggie
eggie (2026-07-31 14:59:29+00:00): Yep.. genoeg te doen hier.
Heb dat water maar ingetekend. Akkerland aangepast naar gras. Er zijn recentere luchtfoto's.
Je kunt quick ortho gebruiken als achtergrond. 
Mapse
RvE5422 (2026-07-31 15:04:14+00:00): Dan zal ik eens kijken hoe je dat gedaan hebt. Ben je zelf ook bekend hier in de buurt?
eggie (2026-07-31 15:10:38+00:00): Ken het daar wel, maar ben geen local.Heb wel eens op de Biezen gestaan en rond gefietst.
Er loopt ergens een draadje op het forum hoe je recente foto s kunt gebruiken in editor id.
Ik gebruik editor josm.
RvE5422 (2026-07-31 15:18:06+00:00): Dat ken ik nog niet, maar je brengt me op ideeën 💪
eggie (2026-07-31 15:22:48+00:00): https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/editor-josm-stap-voor-stap/75047

Dan kun je zelf pdok achtergronden toevoegen.
Ook de meest actuele editor.
MassCartog (2026-07-31 14:26:58+00:00): Hi welcome to OSM. Wanted to let you know just uploading a GPX file to OSM does not add it to the map. When you upload a GPX file it just lets you use it as a refrence to manually add the new trail.

You have a new account and might not be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground. If it exists on the ground, it is valid data regardless of a feature being public or private, designated or informal/illegal/unauthorized. Even decommissioned trails should not be removed until they no longer exist. Removing features that exist is actually considered vandalism.

It's clear that these features still exist on the ground. Its really hard completely demolish a trail and have it grow over in less than a month. Not being public access areas is an invalid reason to remove data from OSM.

The correct way to handle this is to use OSM's tagging system. access=private, or access=no would be appropriate if they are closed to the public now. Once this is done, services that do use OSM data will reflect that and specify their access.

After a trail has been decommissioned and is no longer there, a a better practice is to use the abandoned tags rather then removing it. This was clearly a well used trail bases on the heatmap, it should not just be remoed from osm the instent its decommissioned, that is why OSM uses lifecycle tags.

Please read this for more info:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
eggie (2026-07-31 13:00:20+00:00): Hoi,

Je brug heb ik verwijderd. Die hoort in het pad met bridge=yes layer=1  Ik heb het aangepast. Ook maar gelijk het water en die stenen toegevoegd stepping_stones. 
CTRL F5 voor het effect
pavel bankevich (2026-07-31 12:40:26+00:00): Improved road connectivity according to Bing streetside #mapbox_missing_roads
Flynn Marquardt (2026-07-31 15:32:39+00:00): Seit wann hat eine Grenze eine Zufahrt? Welcher member Typ ist denn dafür vorgesehen?
eggie (2026-07-31 13:10:30+00:00): Een ford is een doorwaadbare plaats. Er is een brug dus geen ford. 
De brug heb ik weer verwijderd en de tags in het wegdeel gezet. Tip Dus geen wegen op wegen gaan intekenen.

Mapse
eggie (2026-07-31 13:19:43+00:00): De paden liggen verder wel heel precies. Dat is oke.
Frans S (2026-07-31 13:09:00+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please read the instructions
Quote:
Connect roads to roads. Always connect roads to other roads where they meet and never end roads on land use or other area edges.
End of quote.
You did not connect roads within the settlement
Please connect them.
Best regards
rle32795 (2026-07-31 14:07:01+00:00): Some tweaks from MML aerial.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-31 18:26:23+00:00): SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is not allowed on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account; see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more information.

Furthermore, use of Google Maps as a source is strictly prohibited by both OSM and Google policies--see https://osm.wiki/Google for more details.

Reverted adding SEO spam POI with advertising/malformed tags, major node drag and prohibited source=* of Google Maps, in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/186722850
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-31 18:26:52+00:00): SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is not allowed on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account; see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more information.

Furthermore, use of Google Maps as a source is strictly prohibited by both OSM and Google policies--see https://osm.wiki/Google for more details.

Reverted adding SEO spam POI with advertising/malformed tags, major node drag and prohibited source=* of Google Maps, in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/186722850
keesm (2026-07-31 15:30:29+00:00): combinatie landuse=construction en construction=apartments lijkt me niet juist. landuse=residential en bij import building=construction met construction=apartments lijkt me logischer
Dillen GJ (2026-07-31 17:02:53+00:00): Eens
eggie (2026-07-31 14:46:44+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-07-31 14:52:25+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback.. Tip Maak altijd een verbindingsnode bij kruisende wegen. Het zal anders niet goed routeren. Ik heb dat nu aangepast.
warnings:crossing_ways:highway-highway 	1

Het noordelijk deel is getagd als highway=path. Dus ook voor fietsers. Hoe is dat met het nieuwe deel? Dat heb je als footway ingetekend. 

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
cswilson252 (2026-07-31 14:44:20+00:00): *nonexistent 8 stop
nerihv (2026-07-31 14:44:50+00:00): mapeado con bing desplazamiento usado 3.4, 0.24
Yunan973 (2026-07-31 16:43:07+00:00): Bonjour,

au cas où tu n'aurais pas vu, la relation 3200337 est cassée (pas d'attribut, chemins non fermés).

Cordialement
eggie (2026-07-31 15:18:44+00:00): Hoi.. Het zal vast de straatnaam niet zijn.. dus de kan er weer af. Nooit name= 
.....gebruiken bij beschrijvingen.
Groet,
eggie
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-31 18:27:06+00:00): SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is not allowed on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account; see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more information.

Furthermore, use of Google Maps as a source is strictly prohibited by both OSM and Google policies--see https://osm.wiki/Google for more details.

Reverted adding SEO spam POI with advertising/malformed tags, major node drag and prohibited source=* of Google Maps, in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/186722850
felipeeugenio (2026-07-31 15:26:19+00:00): Hola Alonso. ese sector está listo ya? se puede circular?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186710894
nerihv (2026-07-31 15:06:36+00:00): mapeado con bing desplazamiento usado 3.4, 0.24
nerihv (2026-07-31 15:30:53+00:00): mapeado con bing desplazamiento usado 3.4, 0.24
alpacaMaps (2026-07-31 18:27:31+00:00): This changeset adds one or more surveillance cameras in a spot that looks unlikely — the nodes sit well away from any road, which usually means the cameras aren't physically present on the ground.

If these cameras are real, please let us know so the map stays accurate. Otherwise, we'd kindly ask that you avoid adding cameras that aren't actually there, and that you remove any temporary or test nodes once you're done.

If this was simply a mistake, no problem at all — just clean up the nodes that don't correspond to a real-world camera, and leave a quick note here so we can help.

Thanks for helping keep OpenStreetMap accurate.

— alpacaMaps
eggie (2026-07-31 15:57:49+00:00): Welkom bij OSM,

Bedankt voor je bijdrage.
Probeer als het kan de apotheek op de adresnode bij te taggen... dus op het gebouw.
Mvg,
eggie
eggie (2026-07-31 16:28:39+00:00): Info heb ik samengevoegd.. Website aangepast. Link werkte niet.
Poi verplaatst naar juiste adresnode.
Gr eggie
Hufkratzer (2026-07-31 22:21:51+00:00): Hi,
outdoor riding arenas are usually tagged with leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian (and not with leisure=horse_riding + horse_riding=outdoor_arena ).  See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a#Riding_centre_(equestrian) , example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1381850582#map=17/60.637455/24.792245&layers=P

There should be only one area (or node) tagged with leisure=horse_riding for every riding centre ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element rule).
Bąbel (2026-07-31 21:14:29+00:00): wesoła twórczość? rozumiem że jednak nie odwołał pan przebudowy i zmian w organizaci 'przejezdności...
HolgerJeromin (2026-07-31 20:05:14+00:00): This is still a footway. But when this is your local tagging I am fine with it.
nerihv (2026-07-31 16:21:56+00:00): mapeado con bing desplazamiento usado 3.4, 0.24
fuzTheWuz (2026-07-31 16:52:12+00:00): Whoops, there's more houses remaining in Henty Park! I didn't see them, hence the word "remaining" in the comment. Working on them now!
nerihv (2026-07-31 17:02:12+00:00): mapeado con bing desplazamiento usado 3.4, 0.24
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186716747
nerihv (2026-07-31 16:55:55+00:00): mapeado con bing desplazamiento usado 3.4, 0.24
nerihv (2026-07-31 17:07:48+00:00): mapeado con bing desplazamiento usado 3.4, 0.24
nerihv (2026-07-31 17:17:32+00:00): mapeado con bing desplazamiento usado 3.4, 0.24
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186719115
nerihv (2026-07-31 23:58:45+00:00): mapeado con bing desplazamiento usado 3.4, 0.24
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186719303
nerihv (2026-07-31 23:58:54+00:00): mapeado con bing desplazamiento usado 3.4, 0.24
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186719343
eggie (2026-07-31 17:29:53+00:00): Hee.. Josm nu!
Het was overigens al goed gemapt hier. Mn eigen edits... Parkeervakken niet vastplakken aan de wegen svp.
Groer,
eggie
RvE5422 (2026-07-31 18:04:04+00:00): Weer wat geleerd! Ik dacht dat de parkeerplaats zo als los van de weg zou worden gezien. En ook met als een kleine test om te zien of ik de bewerking voor elkaar kreeg. 
Ik moet nog even uitvinden hoe ik een actuele luchtfoto geïmporteerd krijg. 
#ditisechtleuk
eggie (2026-07-31 18:13:06+00:00): Eigenlijk zijn het twee aparte vakken met parkeerplaatsen. Ik heb het aangepast. Dat street_side zorgt ervoor dat de P wat minder prominent zijn. Anders krijg je een wijk vol parkeerterreinen met grote P's en dat zijn dit eigenlijk niet.
Je moet maar eens kijken.
eggie (2026-07-31 18:15:35+00:00): Eigenlijk als je zin hebt kun je al die grote P's aanpassen naar een vlak
Dus amenity=parking
parking=street_side
orientation=perpendicular
eggie (2026-07-31 17:59:09+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
mbeyerle (2026-07-31 17:44:47+00:00): It took a while to map this with precision but hopefully this can be a first step in reducing excessive speeding along Amboy Ave which is signed 25mph
mbeyerle (2026-07-31 17:48:24+00:00): Changeset pertains to only those crossings and sidewalks along Amboy Ave. More work to be done in the surrounding area!
InsertUser (2026-07-31 22:27:33+00:00): What is your source for these changes?
Negreheb (2026-07-31 20:14:21+00:00): Das ist z.B. etwas, wo ich im Chat mal schnell nachfragen würde. Ich würde nämlich vermutlich eher die Brücke ohne layer lassen udn das wasser mit layer=-1 versehen. Der Radweg süd-östlich sich auch nicht ganz korrekt aus, der soll ja eig. unter der brücke sein.