piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
arjunaraoc (2026-03-19 06:15:28+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).  It would be good if you can  add number of charging bays.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179738357
iandees (2026-03-12 09:42:28+00:00): Hi! It looks like a node in this changeset was accidentally moved. This can happen when panning the map. The node has been moved back to its previous position.
kingkingHK (2026-03-13 08:38:36+00:00): Repairs https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179676019
NeisRevert (2026-03-12 08:47:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/179742655
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
NeisBot (2026-03-12 07:48:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 23 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/275514956 v8 | 4 crossings
https://osm.org/way/687922986 v6 | 4 crossings
https://osm.org/way/41250959 v10 | 3 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/6449279958 v4

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179739784
NeisRevert (2026-03-12 08:47:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/179742605
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
NeisRevert (2026-03-12 08:47:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/179742586
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
kingkingHK (2026-03-13 08:42:49+00:00): Repairs https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179676082
NeisRevert (2026-03-12 08:46:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/179742563
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
Koldo Osinaga (2026-03-12 08:52:16+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Importaci%C3%B3n_de_datos_del_SITNA/Red_viaria
eggie (2026-03-12 08:33:09+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
bxl-forever (2026-03-12 09:04:24+00:00): Hello,

You are probably unaware of existing mapping practices, so I will try to inform you here.

Buildings all over in Belgium are traced from official government data, one should not trace them from _aerial imagery_.  Those images are nice but they are distorted and the distorsion changes every year, contrary to cadastral data, which gives the exact position.  Please be kind and do not "correct" the shapes of buildings, because by doing so you are just applying an unwanted distorsion.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Belgium/Conventions/Buildings

I see you are using the simple online editor from the osm.org website; it is possible to see the building outlines through the Background button → UrbAdm is the one within the Brussels Region.

I restored the correct shapes of the modified buildings along Lannoy.
gscholz (2026-03-14 06:25:29+00:00): Hi SimonPoole,
this changeset has left behind a damaged boundary relation for "Saint-Aubin-Sauges":

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=6.85443&lat=46.88779&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1685529/history#map=14/46.90680/6.75317

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2026-03-14 06:27:41+00:00): The boundary relation of "Vaumarcus" is damaged as well here:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1685539/history#map=15/46.88222/6.75748
SimonPoole (2026-03-14 07:17:02+00:00): Neither boundary actually exists anymore since many years and should simply be deleted, or at least the misleading tags removed.
eggie (2026-03-12 08:37:07+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-03-12 08:40:18+00:00): Wat was je bedoeling?
Je hebt trees=apple_trees toegevoegd, maar dat is geen valide OSM tag.
Een boom zelf kun je met natural=tree toevoegen en dan de soort specificeren met species= en species=nl=

MVG
eggie
rempshaener (2026-03-12 19:52:15+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.
Du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Ich habe keine Anmerkungen.
Vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag und weiterhin viel Spaß beim Mappen.
Viele Grüße
kingkingHK (2026-03-13 08:40:56+00:00): Repairs https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179676222
recoverpoint (2026-03-13 20:29:15+00:00): Recovering map to normal from foreigner's vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179827994
lankapuhelin (2026-04-17 19:23:44+00:00): Vaihdoit aika monta tietyyppiä unclassifiediksi Uutelassa. Oletko lukenut aihetta koskevat wikisivut? Eikö unclassifiedin pitäisi johtaa jostain johonkin muualle, eli sitä ei voida käyttää päättyvillä teillä? Residential sopii muutenkin tänne nimetyille teille hyvin
Senihtu (2026-05-18 08:41:00+00:00): Hi!
sieh dir way 409012023 nochmal an.
Ich würde ja addr:* einfach löschen - wenn addr: street nicht ein anderer wäre als name
gruß
Senihtu
chris66 (2026-05-18 12:40:27+00:00): Oh, danke, werde ich mir anschauen, vermutlich sind die Tags da versehentlich dranngekommen. 
LG
tastrax (2026-03-12 10:42:20+00:00): This parking area does not need this name unless that is signposted somewhere at the location
Juupero (2026-05-16 21:12:55+00:00): Huomasin että poistit kaksi porras way:ta jotka on olemassa. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1441489026
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1428894640
Miksi ne on poistettu?
liljaadeliina (2026-05-27 11:40:22+00:00): Taisin poistaa ne epähuomiossa, anteeksi.
NeisBot (2026-03-12 08:45:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/1487931488 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Farmacia Anna Terra"
---
Por exemplo, uma versão mais neutra e factual do seu texto poderia ser: "Farmácia Anna Terra"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-20 17:33:02+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180170903
(Delete spam tags. First version)
OlasMapy (2026-03-12 18:28:08+00:00): ostatnio widziałem tam płot jeszcze nwm czy tam sa garaze
adas (2026-03-12 20:54:28+00:00): Tutaj zdjęcia:
https://www.skyscrapercity.com/threads/bydgoszcz-tramwaje.331862/page-474?post_id=196796933#post-196796933
iandees (2026-03-12 09:38:57+00:00): Hi! It looks like a node in this changeset was accidentally moved. This can happen when panning the map. The node has been moved back to its previous position.
habi (2026-03-12 08:52:03+00:00): Die Hängematte war als "Aussichtspunkt" https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1484529140 hinzugefügt.
Norbert Dichter (2026-03-12 20:07:18+00:00): Hello, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. Thank you for your contribution. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. Or just hit the Q-key.
Also please keep in mind: many buildings are very close but do not actually touch each other, try to map them close to each other without letting them connect or share nodes with each other, roads, or residential area outlines. In the iD web editor, holding down the "alt" key will keep nodes from "snapping" to each other and accidentally connecting.  Thanks so much for your contribution, Norbert 'Nodi' Dichter, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179742911
iandees (2026-03-12 09:38:17+00:00): Hi! It looks like a node in this changeset was accidentally moved. This can happen when panning the map. The node has been moved back to its previous position.
kingkingHK (2026-03-13 08:43:57+00:00): Repairs https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179671581
ivanbranco (2026-03-14 09:19:16+00:00): Ciao Cecchino, se sono chiuse da cancelli forse sarebbe più giusto access=private che access=no?
ivanbranco (2026-03-14 09:20:17+00:00): Ops, vedo che è esattamente ciò che hai fatto in questo edit. Avevo visto il precedente ma commentato questo
Shoorick (2026-03-12 08:58:44+00:00): https://osm.org/note/4723699
https://osm.org/note/5200973
eggie (2026-03-12 09:17:34+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedack: Zo te zien is de brug nu daadwerkelijk weg.
https://viewer.satellietdataportaal.nl/@52.34591,5.217098,19/?datastrip=20260302_SVNEO-03&sensorname=SuperView-NEO
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
MTijn (2026-03-12 09:55:21+00:00): Dank voor de review!
kingkingHK (2026-03-13 08:44:27+00:00): Repairs https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179671589
Andrea Alessioli (2026-05-18 20:36:37+00:00): Posso sapere perché hai rimosso dalla route operatore e fonti precedenti e li hai sostituiti con solo Arriva (Brescia tra l'altro)?
Oltre a quello penso tu abbia accidentalmente duplicato la fermata alle scuole elementari di Cologno, ce n'era già una segnata sotto la tettoia (potrebbe essere una buona idea spostarla leggermente così più renderer la segnano)
Thomaso58 (2026-05-19 18:58:48+00:00): 

Ciao Andrea

L'operatore corretto è Arrive Bergamo, non Arriva Brescia. È stato corretto. Errore mio; ho incluso così tante linee di autobus a Brescia che la correzione è automatica. La fermata duplicata è stata eliminata e quella nascosta sotto il chiosco è stata visualizzata. Ovviamente, puoi sempre chiedere. Avresti potuto correggerla tu stesso; non ho problemi a riguardo. Arriva Bergamo ha acquisito tutto. Sicuramente nella zona sud di Bergamo. Almeno, non sono riuscito a trovare nessun altro operatore online. La situazione è diversa a ovest, vicino a Lecco. Lì si trovano ancora orari (vecchi) di altri operatori quasi identici. Ho smesso di lavorarci. Il rischio era troppo alto per me. Ho bisogno di un contatto locale per sapere cosa è valido in quella zona. Probabilmente Arriva Brescia è l'unico operatore presente. Le linee di autobus a Brescia necessitano ancora di molti aggiornamenti. Nella zona nord-est, le linee non sono PTv2 e probabilmente mancano anche le fermate. E manca circa il 40% delle linee di autobus.

... Questo testo è stato generato da Google Traduttore; Spero che tu possa capire.

Cordiali saluti, Thomas
Andrea Alessioli (2026-05-19 21:36:07+00:00): Oops, I just kind of assumed you were Italian because you were editing around here.
The thing is I'm pretty sure that while Arriva is handling digital ticketing and website timetables it's not the only operator in the consortium, last time I paid attention to it there was also at least AGI/Autoguidovie running buses on the line, so I'd rather revert to having the consortium's name (Bergamo Trasporti Sud SCARL) as operator once I'm home and do some bus spotting to re-confirm it's not just Arriva.
Arriva's timetable is also missing a bunch of stops in between the listed ones, https://www.muoversi.regione.lombardia.it is a better source, though not as good as a gtfs archive, I don't think we have those
Thomaso58 (2026-05-20 04:55:42+00:00): Hallo Andrea
Alle the timetables in Italy show only a reduced set of bus stops. I use the ARRIVA tool. It shows all bus stops.
BR Thomas
Andrea Alessioli (2026-06-05 10:44:25+00:00): Sorry to bother you again, what is this Arriva tool you were speaking of?
Because I've found their map view (like this onehttps://bergamo.arriva.it/en/line/bergamo-mozzanica-crema/ ), but I'm fairly sure the stop icons are just the ones listed by Google Maps.
Andrea Alessioli (2026-06-05 10:47:55+00:00): It seems to have an alright naming scheme for not-quite-named stops near intersections (Town - Major road/minor road).
It could be adopted as alt_name, keeping the name in line with official timetables from the region
Thomaso58 (2026-06-05 11:10:13+00:00): You found the correct timetable. The Tool that I use is https://www.mycicero.it/arriva-bg/TPWebPortal/it/solutions?a=1&c=0&w=0&t=0,1,3,15&d=1749130080000&aw=0&st=Limone,%20Gavardo,%20Brescia,%20ITA&sa=Limone,%20Gavardo,%20Brescia,%20ITA&slat=45.5745104&slng=10.4562459&et=Tremosine%20sul%20Garda,%20Brescia,%20ITA&ea=Tremosine%20sul%20Garda,%20Brescia,%20ITA&elat=45.7715586&elng=10.7601975

If you enter from "Bergamo" to Crema Date 30 Augusto, then you get a list of the courses. If you chose on of it (M), then you see a map with all bus stops.  I have a screen shot from that, but I cannot inserted it in this comment. I try to move it to you on an other way. BR Thomas
Thomaso58 (2026-06-05 11:39:19+00:00): Ohh Jehh The naming of bus stops in Italie produces headaches. Also the APPs have problem with that. And also the operators (Arriva) for example have problems. 
In Switzerland there exists a list of all bus stops and train stops and so on from the goverment. Yes the swiss are not as chaotic as the Italiens.
That with the alt name I never have seen in Italie.
If I correct remember, then I used the name out of the Arriva tool. 
The first problem is the spelling. My Italien spelling is better than that of the person that wrote the APP especially in the Trentino. (Trentino Trasporti) Capital letters yes or no. 
The second problem is, if a bus stops already exists with annother name. That happens for example in the town of Bergamo. Then I used a combination of both names. I assume the already existing other name come from another operator or from the past. But it is clear the correct name is the ARRIVA name.
PS. The MAPY APP uses if they have different names two bus stops nearby each other.
Attention: I think we are not allowed to use the GOOGLE MAPS information about the bus stops due a copyright. If there is something not clear, the I use GOOGLE Maps for verification. The tool for the buses in (I think it is Cremona) shows for the position of the bus stops Google MAPS. That means there the bus stops are all proper implemented in GOOGLE MAPS. The urban buses in Cremona are not implemented and in my opinion this information cannot be used. 
Soory the comment is long very long. 
BR Thomas
Andrea Alessioli (2026-06-05 22:38:36+00:00): Thanks for linking to the mycicero tool, seems pretty handy.
The reason I'm proposing to use it as alt_name is because https://www.muoversi.regione.lombardia.it is (as far as i know) the "official" government source for public transport in Lombardy
Thomaso58 (2026-06-06 09:05:53+00:00): Mouversi is also the official Tool of Trentino Trasporti. I used it for the bus stop names in Trentino. But my muoversi is total different to the lombardia muoversi? Yes I think we have to compare the bus stop names of the different sources. On a hurry the lombardia muoversi showed me only trains from bergamo to crema? I wanted to show buses?
Ps the trentino muoversi is not finished it shows the behavior of a tool under development. Br Thomas
Andrea Alessioli (2026-06-06 09:47:58+00:00): They're different tools, "muoversi" just means "to move oneself" so it's a pretty generic name for a public transport info tool.

The fastest way to find bus timetables with the Lombardy one is to look them up by town or stop name, you only need to fill in one of the fields.
Thomaso58 (2026-06-06 12:51:27+00:00): Thank you but not as easy as you think. In Italie outside of the cities. You will find nearly no bus stopp in OSM. The bus stops are the bigger problem than the bus routes.You will find bus routes with nearly no bus stops. BR Thomas
Thomaso58 (2026-06-07 13:07:35+00:00): Names of bus stops. I checked some samples in Crema. The ARRIVA App names & Google Maps names & the in OSM inserted names (from me inserted) are all identical. The MAPY app, that is very good in the Trentino is rubish in that region. I checked the muoversi lombardia app. I think it has no timetable inserted. It references to the local provider. 
Summary: The naming of the bus stops like I did it is OK. 
PS. All the apps have the timetables not inserted. The use the timetable information from the operator network. In that case arriva. In switzerland this are GTFS datas. GTFS is a formar part of Google. But also GTFS has no database they defines the interface between the Apps and the Network. In Switzerland they are just implmenting GTFS datas in the routes. I tried to understand where the GTFS information comes from and how that all works. This is in fact my business, but I understood only that was is mentioned above. 
That means it is all OK. 
Second summary. The bus names comes in Italie from the Network. If the APP shows bus stops and timetables, then we can assume it comes from a database and all apps show the same. 
GTFS interfaces are used for real time delays of trains and buses. This information comes from the operator. In Italie that works not bad.
Thats all what I know. BR Thomas
Andrea Alessioli (2026-06-08 15:19:59+00:00): Thank you for the info, I'd like to add that there is also non-realtime GTFS, for providing static timetables.
In Lombardy it's provided for Trenord trains at https://www.dati.lombardia.it/Mobilit-e-trasporti/Orario-Ferroviario-Regionale-Gtfs/3z4k-mxz9/about_data , but we have no such data for buses.
It seems odd to me that muoversi lombardia doesn't show you timetables at all.
I've seen that selecting a line directly doesn't show you anything, which is definitely a bug, but if you go under lines, enter the town and then search it will show the lines that stop in the town and they will have a button to download the timetable as a PDF.
It won't have stop positions but it has canonical stop names in chronological order.
Andrea Alessioli (2026-06-08 15:46:28+00:00): I can also confirm that the operator for line M is not exclusively Arriva, I have seen buses on the line operated by Autoguidovie and Locatelli.
All of them are part of the Bergamo Trasporti Sud consortium, which operates extra-urban lines south of Bergamo.
I should probably create wikidata entries for them.
Thomaso58 (2026-07-06 08:18:31+00:00): Ciao Andrea
This is a status report about the bus lines arround Bergamo.
I think I have finished the region Bergamo. I changed all bus lines to PTv2. Added missed bus stops. In the meantime  I am also able to handle the Lecco Transporti busses. 
I checked also for missing bus lines. 
The only thing that is open are bus lines in the south of bergamo. 
Here the 3 operators ARRIVA, Bergamo trasporti sud and Locatelli are working. 
There are bus lines missing. . All 3 operators have bus lines common in there timetables. But Bergamo trasporti sud and Locatelli have bus lines that only they serve. The timetables for both are good and show all bus stops. I did some checks. It is possible to add these bus lines to OSM, but very painful. On has to collect the bus stops out of Mapy and Google Maps. 
The ARRIVA tools do not show these lines. And google maps fails also to find these connections. 

But I do not want to do that toooooo painful!!!!
BR Thomas
Andrea Alessioli (2026-07-06 12:31:35+00:00): Thanks for the update, I'd like to clarify that Bergamo Trasporti Sud is a consortium of operators, of which Arriva and Locatelli are part (together with Autoguidovie, SAI and TBSO)
I've drafted a wikidata page the best way i could (never really used wikidata before) for the network and operators, it starts at https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q140447481

The Bergamo Trasporti website also has timetables at https://www.bergamotrasporti.it/orari-stampabili-in-vigore/ but keep in mind that operator logos in the timetable may not be the only actual operator
tastrax (2026-03-12 10:46:34+00:00): There is a common pattern in many of your changesets. In most cases a name is not required for these objects. 

Please take the time to learn how edits should be made - lots of great information on the wiki - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/ or other communication channels such as the OPM world Discord https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/
tastrax (2026-03-12 10:48:58+00:00): https://discord.gg/openstreetmap
kingkingHK (2026-03-13 08:45:05+00:00): Repaired by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179671635
kingkingHK (2026-03-13 08:45:23+00:00): Repairs*
OlasMapy (2026-03-12 10:56:04+00:00): wszystkie sygnalizacje świetlne w Bydgoszczy mają sygnał, nie musisz zmieniać.
acet2ngaia (2026-03-12 09:23:29+00:00): Mistakenly deleted an area of woods at the northern end of Shelley Island that could have been reused rather than remade. When the island was also a wood, I originally subtracted the farmland from the wood, which left the separately mapped wood redundant, but later I realized the farmland would no longer be part of the island, so I had to redraw the woods anyway. By that point it was too far back in my undo history :(
mavl (2026-03-13 15:14:02+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок изменил статус дороги с highway=track на highway=unclassified. На трассе действительно стоит указатель, что по этой дороге можно проехать в Пономарёва, но это обычная полевая дорога и нет гарантии, что по ней получится проехать до деревни. В Пономарёва рекомендуется ездить по асфальтовой дороге через Гилёво.   
Я взял на смелость вернуть этой дороге прежний статус.  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/260128928/history
pesec (2026-03-16 04:03:23+00:00): Хорошо
t_ja (2026-03-12 18:34:50+00:00): Ahoj,
preco si odstranil bankomat UniCredit banky?
Este pred par tyzdnami som z neho vyberal hotovost a stale ho maju uvedeny na svojej stranke, takze je minimalna pravdepodobnost, ze bol zruseny...

T.
Duški Kubov (2026-03-13 11:05:31+00:00): Ahoj, 

máš pravdu, ide o chybnú úpravu. Mal som mylný obraz, že je tam namiesto UCB bankomat inej banky. Plus ma zmiatla aplikácia UCB, kde sa v tomto mieste bankomat ani neuvádza. Určite to upravím naspäť. Ďakujem za upozornenie.
t_ja (2026-03-14 18:58:15+00:00): Ahoj,
vďaka za info. Bankomat som obnovil v OSM dátach aj s kompletnou históriou.
Nachádza sa aj v aplikácii UCB, akurát je "trochu" posunutý, cca 660m smerom na východ (pri začiatku ulice Pod hájom). Tipujem, že je to spôsobené tým, že adresa neobsahuje orientačné číslo, a preto bol umiestnený na začiatok ulice Obvodová, a teda takmer na križovatku s Bôrickou cestou.

Ešte ťa chcem požiadať, aby si nepridával adresu na jednotlivé POI, keďže adresa patrí budove. V prípade, že chýba budova, treba ju zakresliť, adresu pridať na ňu a POI (bez adries) umiestniť do tejto novej budovy.

T.
gc27 (2026-03-12 10:26:36+00:00): 当該Wikiではキー`int_name`も「国際名」として挙げられており、一律に削除するのは不適ではないか
gc27 (2026-03-12 23:45:23+00:00): OSMJPコミュニティ（Discord https://discord.gg/pNuUM99kUX ）にて、本件編集およびhayashiさんのblockについて議論があり、
・int_nameの一律削除は不当
・hayashiさん含め編集合戦になっていることは問題
・他ChangeSetで1万件の物件削除等含め問題視
という状況。
gc27 (2026-03-14 08:22:58+00:00): フォーラム https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/key-int-name-must-be-deprecated/142316 がJP Discordコミュニティに共有されてきたので認識しました。