piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
fs_LT (2025-04-09 06:39:48+00:00): Hi,
da du ja sehr viel in Vorarlberg pflegst und ein Großteil davon wohl von dir sein dürfte, könntest du dir bei Gelegenheit bitte mal die ganzen "traffic_sign=AT:1 " ansehen und sie auf den aktuellen Stand lt. Wiki bringen? https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/21Xd
fs_LT (2025-04-09 06:48:35+00:00): und vielleicht auch die "AT:1: " https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/21Xf
fs_LT (2025-05-22 08:25:06+00:00): Könntest du da bei Gelegenheit bitte was machen?
jeka p (2025-05-26 18:57:35+00:00): Hi!
habe nicht vergessen. Komme bei meinen eigenen aktuellen Surveys nicht nach.
SG
fs_LT (2025-05-27 05:19:58+00:00): Super , danke
peb-kac (2025-04-09 14:26:50+00:00): Hey, weet je zeker dat dit een voetpad is geworden? In het [NWB](https://wegkenmerken.ndw.nu/wegkenmerken/wegvakken/600518488/kenmerken/baansubsoort?kaartlagen=TRAFFIC_SIGN,BRT,CARRIAGEWAY_TYPE) staat dit namelijk nog steeds geregistreerd als een G12a fietspad.
eggie (2025-04-09 15:10:55+00:00): Ter info: Nieuwe situatie
https://viewer.satellietdataportaal.nl/@50.89676,5.833778,18/?datastrip=20250325_PNEO-03

Groet
eggie
peb-kac (2025-04-09 16:38:29+00:00): Ah, bedankt Eggie! Op die beelden is inderdaad een nieuwe situatie te zien. Ik vraag me wel nog af of de maxspeed=80 klopt in combinatie met fietsers op de weg, maar dat zal in de toekomst wellicht duidelijk worden.
eggie (2025-04-09 16:56:56+00:00): Dat zal Martin vast wel weten. Die woont daar om de hoek.0 😀
Martin Borsje (2025-04-09 19:22:25+00:00): Zoals je changeset-comment al aangeeft: "survey", betreft dit geen armchair-mapping. Ik ben op de dag van de changeset daadwerleijk, tijdens een omweggetje van mijn wowe-verkeer over deze weg gefietst en de wijzigingen, includief de vermeldin van de verkeersborden, verwerkt. De maximumsnelheid, die heel goed 60 km/h zou kunnen zijn, is mij tijdens de rit ontschoten. Ik zal dat t.z.t. nog controleren. En OSM is sneller dan NDW of BGT :)
Martin Borsje (2025-04-09 19:24:01+00:00): Aanvulling: her verkeersbesluit gemeente Beekdaeln vermeldt aanpassing naar 60 km/h; ik ga dat uitvoeren!
NeisBot (2025-04-09 04:09:36+00:00): Hi ValeriaDiaz1, and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

I've noticed that over the past few hours, you've made several changesets with comments that might be unclear or difficult to understand.

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good changeset comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments.

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment
eggie (2025-04-08 19:32:28+00:00): Dag King    Denk je erom dat alle tagging in UK English gaat.

Zaterdag >>>  Sa
eggie (2025-04-09 06:22:30+00:00): formats aangepast..

o.a. colour=grey
Sanniu (2025-04-09 06:25:23+00:00): Hi, you've crossed highway 65 here. I suppose there is a tunnel underneath? Can you map it?
DoronSela (2025-04-09 18:18:56+00:00): Done. thank you
jcarlson (2025-04-11 21:30:19+00:00): thanks so much for updating these!
joost schouppe (2025-07-25 08:31:39+00:00): je zegt "verhuisd", maar ik zie niet direct een nieuwe locatie in de buurt?
ZldYe (2025-07-25 09:34:34+00:00): Hey, post Troelstralaan is gesloten en post Goese Poort is geopend, linksonder in changeset :)
joost schouppe (2025-07-25 10:46:38+00:00): Oh bijzonder, dan heb ik er zowel hier als in mijn lokale kopie naast gekeken. Sorry voor het storen :)
ZldYe (2025-07-25 11:16:31+00:00): Geen probleem!
dcskobuffs (2025-04-21 20:52:13+00:00): Hello Jaean,

I noticed some classifications on highways such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1369558458, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/775991174, and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1375944223 where they were upgraded to secondary. These may be too high of a classification due to this class of roads being “used to tag major arterial roads” (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=secondary) and typically do not dead-end, as these currently do. I see you mentioned a municipal development plan and while that may provide valid information on these highways, by OSM definition these seem more fitting as residential or tertiary. If you agree, how do you feel about restoring the classification of these back to what they were before?

Thanks and happy mapping!

Hola Jaean,

He observado algunas clasificaciones en carreteras como https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1369558458, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/775991174, y https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1375944223, donde se han actualizado a secundarias. Es posible que estas tengan una clasificación demasiado alta debido a que este tipo de carreteras se utilizan para identificar arterias principales (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=secondary) y no suelen tener salidas cerradas, como ocurre actualmente. Veo que mencionaste un plan de desarrollo municipal y, si bien esto puede proporcionar información válida sobre estas carreteras, según la definición de OSM, parecen más apropiadas como residenciales o terciarias. Si estás de acuerdo, ¿qué te parecería restaurar la clasificación anterior?

¡Gracias y que disfrutes de la cartografía!
dcskobuffs (2025-05-05 16:45:03+00:00): Hello again,

How do you feel about proposed=secondary and highway=residential for these roads? This seems like the best way to go about these as they currently fit the residential classification, but show they will later on be secondary based on the municipal development plan you provided?

Hola de nuevo,

¿Qué opina de la propuesta=secundaria y autopista=residencial para estas vías? Esta parece la mejor manera de abordarlas, ya que actualmente se ajustan a la clasificación residencial, pero indica que más adelante serán secundarias según el plan de desarrollo municipal que proporcionó.
itineris (2025-04-22 09:11:35+00:00): Szia!

Ehhez a módosításodhoz az észrevételeim:
- Tök jó, hogy jelölted a görpark új helyét. De mivel ezt a korábbi parkoló átírásával tetted, a terület alakja megmaradt (a görparké nem ilyen).
- Szintén emiatt maradhatott rajta egy parking=surface címke is, és az egykori parkolóút.
- Továbbá jó lett volna a korábbi rollerpályáról leszedni a nevet és címkézést. Ahonnan elleshető lett volna a használható eszközök címkézése is, a description helyett.

Üdv:
Ákos
SonOfZenMaster (2025-04-22 10:35:48+00:00): Szia!  Rendben, köszönöm a hasznos infokat és  javaslatokat.
Geo-Tobi (2025-04-08 19:48:34+00:00): Warum hgv=no?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/238659667
Wegeschlenzer (2025-04-08 19:58:51+00:00): stimmt, die können ja auch "destination" sein...
infeeeee (2025-04-10 11:15:16+00:00): Szia!

Más térképekről nem másolunk, csak olyan forrást szabad felhasználni osm-en, ami kompatibilis az ODbL-lel, vagy külön engedélyt kaptunk rá. 

https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Licence_and_Legal_FAQ#2._CONTRIBUTING_DATA_TO_OpenStreetMap

Az engedélyeket ezen az oldalon gyűjtjük: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hungary/Importálás/Engedélyek

Ha valaminél nincs licenszinfó akkor az azt jelenti, hogy minden jog fenntartva, nem használható osm szerkesztéshez!

Ha amúgy tudod, hogy ott van a tároló, és ez csak megerősítés az egy érdekes szürkezóna, de ilyenkor inkább ne linkeld, nem ez a forrásod, ne merüljön fel gyanúja se annak, hogy másolsz.
ChrissW-R1 (2025-04-08 19:54:54+00:00): I'm not sure about the name, but it looks much better than lay2.
Badojo (2025-04-08 20:28:07+00:00): What do you mean. Both R-437
and R-438 are roads that exist the decision from 2014 mentions them as old road numbers (https://fbihvlada.gov.ba/bosanski/zakoni/2014/odluke/233.html), which were then restored whe the decision was reversed (https://www.fbihvlada.gov.ba/bosanski/zakoni/2018/odluke/131.htm). I also specificaly reverted the 2014 numbers and highway type back to since they're not main roads so I don't understand why you are reverting my changes
LordGarySugar (2025-04-08 20:55:46+00:00): Hi, I have checked all your changesets as you requested a review and everything looks good so far.

If you have local knowledge you could add specific building types, such as building=detached for a free-standing house or building=garage.
dgitto (2025-04-09 10:20:28+00:00): benvenuto in OSM.
quella highway=residential ha davvero il nome "Istituto d'Istruzione Superiore Francesco Paolo Merendino" ??
eggie (2025-04-09 06:25:48+00:00): Dag KL
De parkeerstrook heb ik aangepast.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:parking%3Dstreet_side

MVG
eggie
Filip009 (2025-04-11 19:21:09+00:00): Zdravím, namiesto name odporúčam použiť ref https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2057197374
eggie (2025-04-09 07:47:13+00:00): Dag KL,

Je vraagt feedback,  Lijkt me oke zo.

MVG
eggie
aixbrick (2025-04-09 11:14:34+00:00): Hallo,
Wendeverbote, die auf sich selbst zeigen, ergeben keinen Sinn, weil kein Router ein solches Wendemanöver vorschlagen würde. Wäre das tatsächlich der Fall, müssten tausende Beschränkungen zusätzlich gemappt werden.
Wendeverbote werden in OSM nur gesetzt, wo sie beschildert sind oder wo ein Router ein Wendemanöver tatsächlich vorschlagen würde, dieses aber unzulässig ist, z.B. hinter einer Mittelinsel wenn dort eine durchgezogene Linie oder Sperrfläche markiert ist. Fehlen diese, wird dort auch keine Beschränkung gemappt, weil die StVO das Wenden hier zulässt.
Gruß
aixbrick (2025-04-16 13:36:19+00:00): Wendeverbote gelöscht mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165029915.
dgitto (2025-04-09 10:28:03+00:00): Ciao,
non inserire i tag address sugli edifici.
Non c'è corrispondenza biunivoca tra un edificio e un civico. In generale un edificio può avere molti civici, anche su vie diverse.
Il civico va messo come nodo separato, nel punto dove si trova l'accesso (la targhetta del civico).
GerdP (2026-06-04 07:08:57+00:00): Moin aus Wildeshausen!
Du hattest hier den Umriss vom abgerissenen Gebäude (demolished:building=yes) mit den Attributen des neuen Gebäudes versehen. Ich habe jetzt den neuen Umriss (laut ALKIS Hintergrund) eingetragen und deine Änderungen übernommen: 
https://www.osm.org/changeset/183627901

Den alten Umiss https://www.osm.org/way/234012969 bitte noch stehen lassen, so lange das alte Haus noch auf Luftbildern zu sehen ist. Die Idee dabei ist ja, das niemand den neuen Umriss so ändert, dass er zu den veralteten Luftbildern passt.

ciao
Gerd
Dawid2849 (2025-04-12 10:36:58+00:00): Czy https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12740131734 nie jest przypadkiem duplikatem https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6570987682 ?
Dawid2849 (2025-05-02 13:29:43+00:00): Skasowałem ze względu na brak odpowiedzi (dopóki jeszcze pamiętam o tym).
grzegorz75jan (2025-05-02 14:52:26+00:00): I słusznie.
dgitto (2025-04-09 10:16:30+00:00): benvenuto in OSM.
tieni conto che avevi mappato solo un edificio con nome. e non l'attività.
inoltre in generale i tag address non si mettono sugli edifici, dato che un edificio può avere diversi civici, e diverse attività (addirittura su strade diverse).
Il modo corretto e di mappare l'edificio e poi di piazzare nodi separati con i civici.
MimmoSan (2025-04-09 12:22:30+00:00): Grazie mille del consiglio, lo applicherò per le prossime mappature!
AgusQui (2025-04-10 22:21:27+00:00): Todavía no funciona dicho ramal
Rodrigo Rega (2025-04-09 18:49:17+00:00): Reverting after discussion with spanish OSM community.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164738663
eggie (2025-04-09 06:12:24+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback .. leisure=dance toegevoegd.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
woowza (2025-04-09 14:29:15+00:00): When adding the buildings, make sure to square the rectangular buildings to remove the unneeded nodes in the buildings.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-04-08 21:50:55+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12740017804

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Allroads (2025-04-08 22:36:34+00:00): Hoi,

access-=yes is een hele moeilijke key/ value  Het zegt eigenlijk, dat je met elk voertuig er op kan.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
JAPIO (2025-04-09 07:03:25+00:00): Hey,

Ja ik begrijp de aarzeling. Ik kreeg via de app StreetComplete de vraag of de speeltuin vrij toegankelijk was. Dit resulteerde kennelijk in deze key/value.  Ik kan met een andere wijziging de key wel weer weghalen?
JAPIO (2025-04-09 07:05:55+00:00): De Engelse vertaling is wat toegeeflijker in haar definitie: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access=yes
Allroads (2025-04-09 10:12:25+00:00): It is the default value and does not usually need to be set.

We taggen veelal, wat niet mag of anders is. En dan taggen we wel eens de bevestiging met *=yes

Veel dingen in OSM is, hoe lees je het, hoe begrijp je het. Dat maakt het wel eens lastig.

Een speelplaats is voor iedereen toegankelijk, als het afgesloten was dan stond er wel private of customers op.
JAPIO (2025-04-09 10:19:13+00:00): Yeah I would agree. I pushed an update to remove the tag.
Rodrigo Rega (2025-04-09 18:49:18+00:00): Reverting after discussion with spanish OSM community.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164738663
NeisBot (2025-04-09 04:10:25+00:00): Hi Menique, and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

I've noticed that over the past few hours, you've made several changesets with comments that might be unclear or difficult to understand.

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good changeset comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments.

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment
eggie (2025-04-09 06:14:19+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Hufkratzer (2025-04-09 21:00:38+00:00): Hi,
was ist denn das hier für ein Quatsch? "Reitplatz korrigiert" - haha. Der Reitplatz war vorher so getaggt, wie Reitplätze in OSM normalerweise getaggt sind. Und du hast ihn als Reitanlage (leisure=horse_riding) umgetaggt, obwohl auf der Seite https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure=horse_riding ganz oben steht, dass Reitplätze als leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian getaggt werden sollten. Und in iD gibt's dafür auch einen Preset mit Namen "Reitplatz". Was soll ich also  von deiner Änderung halten? Willst du absichtlich Probleme produzieren?
MxxCon (2025-04-10 21:14:42+00:00): Hello.
When adding new features, please try to also add their address. That makes it easier to find that specific feature online to add additional data.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164700129
CJJ2501 (2025-05-08 08:30:36+00:00): Hi MxxCon,

Thanks for message!

I added these while walking around, using the Go Map!! app on my iPhone. 
The address information isn't always obvious when you're looking at a POI (point of interest) in real life, and I think the time out "in the field" is better spent adding POIs that are not on the map yet. I find adding address info much easier on the computer e.g. using JOSM to filter POIs which don't have address info.

But I will try to add address information "on the go" if I can (e.g. addr:street shouldn't be too difficult to infer).

Cheers,
Chris
MarcoR (2025-04-10 08:26:02+00:00): Hai aggiunto nome e cognome di una persona privata sul nodo https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12740154094?
MarcoR (2025-04-13 06:18:43+00:00): Reverted new user first changeset which only added given name and family name of a private person.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164880391
pwbriggs (2025-04-13 02:56:23+00:00): Cool, thanks for the contribution! If the building's footprint has changed, you could update that as well (or wait for new aerial imagery to come out). Thanks again, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
Joseph R P (2025-04-13 17:36:42+00:00): Hello. Why were these unpopulated places changed back to hamlets?
viniciusmundimz (2025-05-16 13:55:48+00:00): Olá, 
A avenida Marco Túlio realmente teve novos km de ciclovia implantados, chegando até a praça do Encontro? (onde encontra com a Edmeia Matos)
Lucas Santana (2025-05-17 16:20:34+00:00): A ciclovia da Avenida Juiz Marco Túlio Isaac está indo até pouco antes de chegar no Shopping Monte Carmo
jtracey (2025-04-09 16:21:44+00:00): is this landuse=commercial or landuse=industrial?
galen8183 (2025-04-11 04:28:58+00:00): I'm quite sure it's a mix of =commercial and =retail, judging from the parking and pedestrian arrangement, but not sure on exact boundaries

I know there's a SleepCountry retail location in one of these units (not listed on their store locator). I believe the other units are mostly vacant, having passed by on Homer-Watson Blvd. every so often
jtracey (2025-04-11 04:36:37+00:00): Fair enough, thanks :)
rskedgell (2025-04-09 10:06:26+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I don't think people trying to access Fox Talbot Close via Epping Close is due to people using routing services based on OSM data, as he roads aren't connected in OSM.

That said, I've made a few tweaks, including changing Fox Talbot Close to a (private) residential street - it's not just a service road or driveway. I've also split it at the gate, so the stub between Baker Street and the gate is routeable. Adding vehicle=private to the gated portion wasn't necessary, as the access=* tag applies to all transport modes.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164716098

It may take a few weeks for changes to propagate to routing software.
byziden (2025-04-09 19:16:55+00:00): @rskedgell Delivery drivers are regularly ending up at Epping Close instead of the gate on Baker Street, and on their trackers, they are using OSM, for example, Domino's. This has been on ongoing problem for years according to residents.
keepright! ler (2025-04-26 10:58:40+00:00): The issue might be solved by changing “Fox Talbot Close” to access=destination or vehicle=delivery or such.
keepright! ler (2025-04-26 11:04:50+00:00): One question: Is the public (or a delivery driver) allowed to enter Fox Talbot Close if they ring the bell next to the gate? If yes, it’s likely a case for access=destination or access=permissive, NOT access=private.

(access=private means “No trespassing” or “You must be a specific person e.g. with a key to enter here.”)
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-15 17:09:40+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12740353228/history has fixme:type = shop that was added in this edit
What kind of shop is here?

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop for common values - is any of them fitting?
SharkGeos (2025-04-20 16:20:25+00:00): Hola, paunofu - Hay un problema con este conjunto de cambios con características superpuestas. Los elementos de Catastro no se han combinado correctamente con los elementos OSM existentes. Parece que hay dos áreas dentro de la tarea (multi polígono) y solo se ha procesado una parte. Gracias
paunofu_import (2025-04-23 22:19:46+00:00): Gracias por avisar, se cargaron unos edificios que no me di cuenta... ya está solucionado. Gracias.
paunofu (2025-04-25 15:13:25+00:00): Hola,
En español, el valor correcto para la etiqueta name:es es Islas Malvinas, ya que es la toponimia oficial reconocida por la mayoría de países hispanohablantes.
En todo caso, Islas Falkland podría usarse como alt_name:es, pero no como nombre principal.

Gracias por tu trabajo en el mapa.
Trevor_1 (2025-05-01 00:57:58+00:00): Hola, lo siento, puedes cambiarlo si quieres
ab2000 (2025-05-30 17:16:21+00:00): Hola, podrías cambiarlo por favor? Soy usuaria nueva y no me deja cambiarle el nombre, gracias
Alex W2 (2025-04-09 02:07:40+00:00): I forgot to include a reference to the OSM note where this was discovered. That OSM note is https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164702998
nevw (2025-04-11 23:27:02+00:00): Hi, you seem to have road access to properties here. Private roads/tracks like these are able to be mapped in OSM. They don't need to be part of official road reserves. Just add private access tags. 
The wooded area multipolygons are also affected and I will fix these.
nevw (2025-04-12 05:31:32+00:00): The deleted road sections are in this area
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=150.38782&lat=-33.71773&zoom=19
nevw (2025-04-14 07:53:52+00:00): Osm maps the roads and tracks as they exist on the ground and I have remapped this area to reflect that.
I see with reference to the DCS NSW Base Map layer that is available to us in the editors that the road reserve and property boundaries may be in conflict with part of Frenchmens Road. 
You will need to resolve this with the property owners and local council if a problem exists here. When and if there are changes made to the road and track layout then the new situation can be mapped. 
I note that Waterfall Road is signposted and properties are addressed using this name. I also saw that Frenchmens Road is signposted as Frenchmans Road but that osm is using Frenchmens Road as in source:name=LPI NSW Base Map.
I also fixed the wood multipolygon.
rivermont (2025-04-12 17:50:59+00:00): Please don'r remove the tiger:reviewed tags from ways that haven't actually been checked. The whole neighborhood on Bald Mtn has poor geometry, and a bunch of roads like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/16414861 are missing connections to other roads or are misclassified.
mapman44 (2025-04-12 23:11:13+00:00): Will do.
Totor (2025-04-14 05:13:03+00:00): Hi Delbert,
I saw you converted the service road I temporarily left there until the intersection construction is finished, in a south going primary way.
Did you notice that the other south going road had 3 lanes already ?
Is there really a physical separation between the 2 south going lanes ?
If not, it should be mapped as  a single way.
eggie (2025-04-09 06:17:47+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback...   Info samengevoegd met bestaande adresnode. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Totor (2025-04-14 05:25:24+00:00): Hi Delbert,
It looks like you removed 2 traffic lights and replaced them with only one.
I'm pretty sure there are separate traffic lights for MC Briones coming from the south, and UN Avenue coming from Mactan!
MassCartog (2025-04-09 14:39:13+00:00): Hi goldenmeanie, I noticed in this changeset that you deleted and redrew the outline of this house. A better practice would be to modify the existing elements instead of deleting them and redrawing from scratch. This preserves the history and tags. 

Here you removed the address information of this house. Was this intentional?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history
MassCartog (2025-04-15 13:56:29+00:00): Since goldenmeanie didn't respond, fixed it in  changeset 164986659
Taya_S (2025-05-06 07:40:25+00:00): Reverted locksmith SEO spam DWG Ticket#2025050610000165

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165878080
recrayon (2025-04-09 03:58:39+00:00): will cleanup the short_names
bxl-forever (2025-04-09 07:33:04+00:00): Hello,

Experience Europe was already on the map, here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12541780057

It had been added earlier this year, so perhaps you missed it in case you are using an old local copy of data (Organic Maps does not show you live OSM data).  You may want to refresh data prior to mapping a territory.

Don’t worry, we fixed your edit and re-used some relevant data you added (e.g. the opening hours) to merge them into the existing node.