piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NieWnen (2026-01-20 20:12:30+00:00): Nie za bardzo wiem gdzie, możliwe że mi umknęło?

Czym jest baza SEP? Da się to jakoś odszukać i sprawdzić dany obiekt?

Co do tagu, to prędzej ref:sep jeśli to jest nazwa zewnętrznego źródła o ile się z niczym nie pokrywa, ale to do wpisania na wiki/przedyskutowania i tak.
WieKo68 (2026-01-20 20:22:35+00:00): jest to numer w bazie świątyń Sekretariatu Episkopatu Polski. Służy do szybkiej identyfikacji obiektów. Dlatego stworzyłem ten nietopowy tag church:id, aby było wiadomo, o co chodzi.  Próbowałem to scalić z bazą gcatholic, ale ona ma duże błędy i braki.
NieWnen (2026-01-20 20:32:38+00:00): No dobra, ale to w jaki sposób mapujący może sprawdzić, czy dany numer odpowiada temu co jest w bazie. 
Skąd biorą się te numery? Jest jakaś wyszukiwarka, jakaś lista gdzieś udostępniona?
WieKo68 (2026-01-20 20:43:11+00:00): Od kilku lat ja i mój zespół próbujemy zmapować obiekty sakralne oraz granice administracyjne KK. Na podstawie ankiet wysyłanych do parafii aktualizujmy baze takich obiektów i granic. Ten numer jest nam potrzebny, aby nie dublować poszczególnych obiektów
NieWnen (2026-01-20 23:14:56+00:00): Ok, ale to nie odpowiada na moje pytanie, czy te informacje są gdziekolwiek publiczne dostępne. 

Jeśli jest to gdzieś upublicznione to proszę o linka/instrukcję jak się do tego dostać. 

Jeśli tak nie jest, to niestety, ale nie możemy dodawać nieweryfikowalnych informacji z zamkniętych baz.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Weryfikowalno%C5%9B%C4%87

Jeśli możesz to gdzieś wrzucić to na pewno warto to zrobić. Nawet w formie csv/dowolnego pliku na GitHuba, czy gdziekolwiek (w miarę trwałe miejsce pozwalające na aktualizację pliku).
Chodzi o to, żeby ktokolwiek mógł to weryfikować jak zobaczy taki numer skąd to i co to oznacza i do czego się odnosi.
WieKo68 (2026-01-20 23:24:25+00:00): do końca tygodnia postaram się wrzucić dane na GitHuba
maro21 (2026-03-18 21:08:34+00:00): Można ten link do githuba?
mueschel (2026-01-21 10:50:39+00:00): Hi,
could you check your edits and the tag suggestion in your editor? I guess it should be "survey:date" and not "surgery:date".
NeisBot (2026-01-21 07:25:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13470550186 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Cannabis Dispensary"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-28 07:32:51+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177792508
(No visible changes after review)
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-18 00:22:52+00:00): Cleaned up SEO spam and other tagging for POI in changeset 184249558

https://osm.org/changeset/184249558
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-18 00:29:17+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with advertising/malformed tags and explicit source=* of Google Maps, which is not allowed by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ), in changeset 184249660

https://osm.org/changeset/184249660
woodpeck_repair (2026-01-20 13:41:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 177476827 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-18 00:29:52+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with advertising/malformed tags and explicit source=* of Google Maps, which is not allowed by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ), in changeset 184249669

https://osm.org/changeset/184249669
trigpoint (2026-02-13 18:26:44+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/178516522
woodpeck_repair (2026-01-20 13:41:04+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 177476559.
Vojtěch Fošnár (2026-01-20 16:34:27+00:00): *oprava, v okruhu 50m
maro21 (2026-01-20 22:20:28+00:00): Was this automated edit and import discussed with the community?
Are you aware of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines ?
Vojtěch Fošnár (2026-01-20 16:34:07+00:00): *oprava, v okruhu 50m
maro21 (2026-01-20 22:20:38+00:00): Was this automated edit and import discussed with the community?
Are you aware of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines ?
Dvorný (2026-01-21 04:45:14+00:00): Yes, we discussed it.
Dvorný (2026-01-21 08:31:13+00:00): I will make osm wiki article today.
empty_child (2026-01-21 08:34:34+00:00): Hello
Don't use generic names, please
Jk488 (2026-01-21 17:43:52+00:00): It's written at the entrance of the salon, should it be removed anyway?
empty_child (2026-01-21 20:48:21+00:00): We have a position about naming: "<not to use in name tag if> The feature is known by a generic term or description such as "toilet" or "basketball court". Use a feature tag to indicate the type in a language-neutral, machine-readable way. You can also use description=* or note=* if other tags do not quite express what distinguishes the feature from others of the same type."  (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name#When_not_to_use)
iD even can say about it (but not with Georgian names). But in general, shop=beauty === სილამაზის სალონი, and we prefer the shop tag first. მარკეტი, მაღაზია - the same point.
trigpoint (2026-02-13 18:26:39+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/178516522
NeisBot (2026-01-21 07:25:46+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/11425477707 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Community center"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-28 10:27:40+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177798919
(Restore previous tags)
NeisRevert (2026-01-28 10:31:14+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177799077
(Restore previous tags)
NeisRevert (2026-01-28 10:36:07+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177799278
(Restore previous tags)
ilias_ (2026-01-22 17:09:36+00:00): Bonjour, merci pour votre excellent travail.

Par contre, il y a maintenant 12 "Parc Zénith" sur la carte. Pas la peine d'appeler chaque bout d'herbe "Parc Zénith", seulement tout le parc en lui même.
Hugoren Martinako (2026-02-19 17:29:21+00:00): Buenas, has eliminado aquí el huerto urbano https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/482229444, poniendo todo el área como construcción, pero después de eso, han creado esta nota: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5156879

¿Ha desaparecido el huerto?
OSM-Madrid (2026-02-20 01:58:10+00:00): Si, el huerto ya no existe en ese lugar, toda la manzana (que era un parque para perros y un pequeño huerto) está en obras con maquinaria pesada de construcción y cerrado al público. Si el huerto se ha trasladado a otro lugar no lo sé
NeisBot (2026-01-21 07:21:48+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 14 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/426547041 v2 | 13 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177478281
NeisBot (2026-01-21 07:25:52+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/978802608 v6

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "kayak rental base"
---
Na przykład, bardziej neutralna i fakticzna wersja Twojego tekstu mogłaby brzmieć: "baza wypożyczalni kajaków"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-28 07:32:52+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177792509
(No visible changes after review)
NeisBot (2026-01-21 07:25:56+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/252876089 v12

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Krutynia river launch site"
---
Na przykład, bardziej neutralna i obiektywna wersja Twojego tekstu mogłaby brzmieć: "miejsce startu nad rzeką Krutynią"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-28 07:32:52+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177792510
(No visible changes after review)
jm428 (2026-01-20 15:23:53+00:00): Hi, just so you know we aren't allowed to use Google Maps or Google Streetview as a source because of copyright reasons, so don't put any google links in your changeset comments
Channel91 (2026-01-20 15:31:34+00:00): Thanks for the note. I wasn't aware of that. I won't use a Google Maps as a source going forward.
TrickyFoxy (2026-02-24 09:46:14+00:00): 👋 В правом меню редактора есть кнопка «Настройки фонового изображения». Выберите там спутниковые снимки ESRI — они свежее.

Сможете точнее поставить точку
Nzau (2026-02-28 21:10:06+00:00): Salut chrizzy,
Juste pour info, bicycle=designated n'est pas conseillé sur la voirie.
Il s'agit d'une clé implicite.

Je fais un peu de ménage dans le coin.

A bientot,
Enzo
OSM-Contributer (2026-01-20 15:09:20+00:00): Also, Added road name of Kacheri Road
OSM-Contributer (2026-01-20 15:09:54+00:00): A library and some computer shops too
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-04-24 12:01:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 181761661 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious changes in Somali, Ethiopia.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20179
Anonymous36863 (2026-01-20 15:44:36+00:00): Има и външни театри, на пример: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theatre_of_ancient_Greece
Dimitar155 (2026-01-20 16:01:48+00:00): theatre:type=open_air
Leo Slager (2026-01-21 00:26:02+00:00): Dag DwarfNebula,

Met de editor iD waar je mee werkt kun je geen routerelaties bewerken.
Dat gaat altijd fout.
De nieuwe stop_position staat nu achter aan de route vastgeplakt en dat geeft dus ook altijd een foutmelding.
Als je serieus met routerelaties aan de slag wilt stap dan over op de editor JOSM.
Baloo Uriza (2026-01-21 17:03:29+00:00): highway=cycleway already implies foot=yes, bicycle=yes.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177481319
Yhor (2026-01-22 01:23:15+00:00): They were set to "No", for each. It wouldn't allow routing tools to route here without the "draw straight lines" feature. It took me a few weeks to figure out why (I thought it was slow to update).
Baloo Uriza (2026-01-22 02:44:26+00:00): Aaah, OK, I get what you're saying now.  In which case, it's probably best to just remove bicycle=* and foot=* in this case (since highway=cycleway implies bicycle=designated, foot=yes in this country).
tjoeker (2026-02-09 15:15:30+00:00): why did you tag this as 'under construction'? The Belgian side has been maintained and ready for operations since years/decades. It's the German side that needs reactivation. Unless you can show me there's actual works going on there?
PM_RHA (2026-01-22 09:21:33+00:00): Erreur, à supprimer
PM_RHA (2026-01-22 09:29:16+00:00): Travaux donc à bien prendre en compte pour interdiction 3,5T
Vojtěch Fošnár (2026-01-20 16:33:52+00:00): *oprava, v okruhu 50m
limes11 (2026-01-20 18:08:41+00:00): Hallo

place=suburb war hier falsch, allerdings ist place=village ebenfalls inkorrekt, da Parscheid nicht von Asbach getrennt ist.

Ich würde hier place=neighbourhood vorschlagen.

VG
TangledRockets (2026-01-22 09:12:30+00:00): Hi MadestCat,

Soweit ich es verstehe, ist ref= für 'globale' Referenzen, wobei local_ref= ist für 'locale' referenzen, wie platform bezeichnungen.

Siehe:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Ahighway%3Dbus_stop

Ich bin gerade schon dran, ich kann die bei hbf sauber eintragen. ( Dachte ich hatte schon, habe aber irgendwie nicht komplett und nicht korrekt)

Grüß,
TR
MadestCat (2026-01-24 23:07:10+00:00): Moin!
Ah, ok, das war mir nicht bekannt. Ich kannte nur den ref= tag und es war halt nicht einheitlich. Daher habe ich das angepasst.

Ist das bei den anderen Umsteigehaltestellen auch schon komplett mit local_ref=?

Grüße
TangledRockets (2026-01-28 18:53:04+00:00): Moin,

Kann ich nicht sicher sagen - wenn ich Haltestellen editiere, versuche ich immer die local_refs zu vergeben.

Um die alle zu prüfen, muss man mit overpass turbo ein Filter bauen. Habe ich noch nicht getan. Es sind oft so viele andere Problemen bzw fehlende Objekte bei Haltestellen, dass ich die lieber schritt für schritt mache.

Viele von den Innenstadt-Haltestellen in Koblenz haben halt keine local_refs zu vergeben, aber außerorts schon.

Wenn ref= getagged ist (mit A,B,C..), ist normalerweise zu korrigieren.

Jeden Tag bisschen schöner ;)

Grüße
TR
NeisBot (2026-01-20 16:08:22+00:00): Hi AlimiGaming1, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 83% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 223 landuse(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177482969
woodpeck (2026-01-20 16:13:09+00:00): user deleted their own data
AlimiGaming1 (2026-01-20 16:15:33+00:00): Hello, thank you for the message.
Yes, the deletions were intentional. I was correcting farmland areas that were incorrect or overlapping.
If something was removed incorrectly, please let me know and I will fix it.
I am still learning OpenStreetMap and appreciate your feedback.
pitscheplatsch (2026-01-20 17:32:07+00:00): Hi, thanks for your reply and for explaining your edits.

Similar to another recent changeset, I noticed that a large number of landuse areas were removed that you yourself mapped only about 10 to 12 days ago. That made me take a closer look at the edits.

Based on your username, I wondered whether you might be mapping with a video game or fictional use case in mind. If so, and I may be mistaken, please note that in the OpenStreetMap project we map what exists on the ground and can be verified from reliable sources such as aerial imagery, surveys, or local knowledge, not what might exist in a game or simulation.

When comparing your recent edits with the available satellite imagery in this area, it seems there may still be room for improvement and alignment with what is actually visible on the ground.

This wiki page explains the principle in more detail and may be helpful:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Map_what's_on_the_ground
AlimiGaming1 (2026-01-20 17:43:29+00:00): Hi,

Thank you for your message and for taking a closer look at my edits.

I would like to clarify that I did not add any fictional features or map something that does not exist on the ground. The changes I made were mainly focused on adjusting landuse boundaries by merging smaller farmland areas into larger ones, where this better reflects how the land is actually used in reality.

While I am indeed using OpenStreetMap data as a reference for a Farming Simulator 25 map, my intention in OSM was still to map real-world landuse based on available imagery and local knowledge, not to introduce game-specific or imaginary data.

That said, I understand the importance of accurate alignment with what is clearly verifiable from satellite imagery, and I am open to reviewing specific areas where my interpretation might differ or could be improved.

Thank you for your feedback and for helping keep OpenStreetMap data accurate.

Kind regards,  
(AlimiGaming1)
pitscheplatsch (2026-01-20 18:23:54+00:00): 👍 Thank you.

Best regards,
Pascal
AndyB_66 (2026-01-21 09:53:58+00:00): ZnRID nie oznacza rozpoczęcia budowy.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177513304
NeisBot (2026-01-21 07:22:34+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 8 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/323918260 v9 | 5 crossings
https://osm.org/way/24278874 v8 | 3 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/671653357 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177483493
NeisReview (2026-01-28 07:32:33+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/177723253
https://osm.org/changeset/177765329
Kurosawa06 (2026-03-14 13:11:14+00:00): Vandalisme : cette place n'existe pas !
Shrinks99 (2026-01-20 16:25:45+00:00): Also addressing & parcel lockers
NeisBot (2026-01-20 16:34:21+00:00): Hi Tarafenc, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 90% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 60 landuse(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177484027
Glassman (2026-02-24 01:28:08+00:00): the trouble with large landuse like this is that there is likely retail and commercial areas which then requires a relation to accurately add.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177484027
Glassman (2026-02-24 01:29:02+00:00): El problema con un uso del suelo tan extenso como este es que probablemente haya zonas comerciales y minoristas, lo que requiere una relación para poder añadirlo con precisión.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177484027
Senihtu (2026-01-28 19:07:02+00:00): Hallo ich bins nochmal!
in der Oberschultheiß-Schremser-Straße gilt das gleiche wie in der Sofienstraße.
Alles richtig gemacht -  aber es gibt noch Adressen mit dem alten (falschen) Straßennamen.

Kennst Du schon https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=addresses&lon=8.46916&lat=49.64178&zoom=18&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.98&overlays=street_not_found
Damit findest Du solche Problemfälle ganz leicht.

einen schönen Abend
Senihtu
maro21 (2026-01-20 22:20:58+00:00): Was this automated edit and import discussed with the community?
Are you aware of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines ?
felipeeugenio (2026-01-25 12:53:36+00:00): Hola Marcelo. No dibujamos así en OSM. Esto más parece un dibujo esquemático. Voy a corregirlo.

Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177484380
mottiger (2026-01-20 16:44:53+00:00): added lanes=* and/or lane_markings=* not highway=street_lamp
voltairovicz (2026-01-20 19:46:02+00:00): Dobra robota, dzięki za dodanie tych linków (widziałem ze miales problem by było ok wszystko), bardzo pomocne i mimo iż znam stronę z zabytkami, to dzięki temu jakoś wygodniej wchodzić na poszczególne obiekty tak czasem (no i przy okazji łatwiejszy dostęp do świetnych materiałów)
NeisBot (2026-01-21 07:26:01+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13471057143 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Stoff und Nähmaschinengeschäft"
---
Zum Beispiel könnte eine neutralere und sachlichere Version deines Textes lauten: "Stoff und Nähmaschinengeschäft"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-01-28 07:32:53+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/177514358
Adam850 (2026-01-21 00:48:49+00:00): Isn't this park closed, at least to car traffic?
MassCartog (2026-01-20 17:23:23+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM! Could you explain why you removed these features. Try to leave better comments, "one" did not help to understand why you removed these things.
willkmis (2026-01-24 23:29:24+00:00): Reverted in 177664768
Rainero (2026-03-18 22:29:16+00:00): Revert mit changeset/180080724
(unzulässige Quelle)
NxPFoto (2026-03-19 10:26:51+00:00): Ist aber auf dem Mapbox Satellitenbild und auf Bayern DOP 40 sichtbar. Heißt das, man muss das nochmal neu mappen? (mit korrekter Quelle?)
daganzdaanda (2026-03-19 22:31:50+00:00): Ich glaub, hier ging es um möglicherweise fehlende Namen (da gibt es auf qa.poole.ch einen overlay) 

Die Straßen waren alle schon eingetragen, nur ohne Namen. Ob es wirklich einen Namen gibt, und wie weit der beschildert ist, muss man normalerweise vor Ort recherchieren. 

Mit viel Glück findet man auch was auf Mapillary oder Panoramax (=streetlevel imagery), Luftbilder helfen wirklich nicht ;-)  Google und Bayernatlas / amtliche Karten sind lizenzmäßig verboten.
daganzdaanda (2026-03-19 22:38:51+00:00): Es wurde der BayernAtlas verwendet, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19940
und den CS-Kommentar https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180132081
NxPFoto (2026-03-21 18:20:13+00:00): Danke für die Erklärung, das hab ich mir also so halb richtig zusammengereimt.
Scheint aber, als ob ich dann den falschen Änderungssatz kommentiert hab :D
Mir gehts speziell um dieses Neubaugebiet: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1351833563/history Was im Zuge des löschens von *diesem* Changeset hier wieder entfernt wurde.
NxPFoto (2026-03-21 18:21:52+00:00): Also danke nochmal für die Erklärung und Klarstellung, dass es hier um Straßennamen geht. Mir gings um die Straßen an sich, die in Zuge dessen wieder entfernt wurden (obwohl man sie auf den Luftbildern erkennen kann) Wie geh ich damit um? Ich würd die dann gleich nochmal neu mappen?