piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NorthCrab_upload (2025-11-04 23:43:09+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10207784735

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:37:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:34:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:35:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:36:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:34:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:37:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:36:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
santamariense (2026-02-05 21:21:48+00:00): Olá Pireneus,

Pela regra vigente aprovada pela comunidade [1], esta rodovia deve ser no máximo tertiary, pois ela não parte de uma sede de município, nem a localidade conectada parece ter mais de 2 mil habitantes, logo, tertiary é a mais adequada.

[1] - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brazil/Classifica%C3%A7%C3%A3o_das_rodovias_do_Brasil

santamariense
eggie (2025-11-04 15:34:42+00:00): Dag 07

Wellicht foot=permissive ipv algemeen access=permissive omdat ook al motor_vehicle=no getagd.
Er loopt hier een wandelroute.

MVG
eggie
w07 (2025-11-06 17:43:04+00:00): Goede tip, ik zal dan nog even proberen na te gaan hoe het zit voor fietsers/ruiters voor ik mijn correctie bijwerk.

Dank!
Wouter
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:34:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
NeisBot (2025-11-04 13:33:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisBot (2025-11-04 13:33:41+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Dentistry office led by Dr Austria"
NeisReview (2025-11-08 21:56:41+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/174396048
marc__marc (2026-01-16 09:33:10+00:00): Hello,
Please don't merge building with one user of a part of the building.
Regards,
Marc
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:37:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:38:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
eggie (2025-11-04 14:11:41+00:00): Welkom bij OSM..
Je hebt een adres toegevoegd aan de gebouwomtrek.
Dat is niet correct. Er is al een adresnode.
Haal je het weer weg?

Mvg..
eggie
eggie (2025-11-04 15:30:34+00:00): Het adres heb ik weer verwijderd.
Ik zal je nog per PB een welkomstmail sturen.

MVG
eggie
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:36:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:38:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
rempshaener (2025-11-04 16:07:29+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.

Zu deinen Bearbeitungen habe ich folgende Anmerkungen, als Beispiel habe ich einmal www.openstreetmap.org/node/13279960786 herausgepickt:

ref
Dieses Feld dient der Aufnahme der Hydrantennummer, die oben rechts auf dem Hydrantenschild ausgewiesen ist. Ich werbe dafür, auf Adressen vollständig zu verzichten. Bislang ist mir noch kein Anwendungsfall untergekommen, in dem die Erfassung von Adressen inhaltlich nachvollziehbar gewesen wäre. Hier ist die Adresse zudem mit den Daten vor Ort nicht kompatibel; die Hausnummer 30 müsste auf der anderen Straßenseite sein. Auf jeden Fall besser aufgehoben wären solche Daten in „description“.

Datum
Das Datum ist falsch herum; statt 4-11-2025 müsste es 2025-11-04 heißen.

Lagegenauigkeit
Ich empfehle die relativ neu verfügbaren Niedersachsen-DOP20-Luftbilder. Sie sind teilweise so genau, dass der Hydrant darauf erkennbar ist. Das ist auch hier der Fall. Der Hydrant liegt entsprechend ca. 5 m weiter westlich.

Vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag und weiterhin viel Spaß beim Mappen. Und bei Fragen gerne melden.

Viele Grüße
Tomas Straupis (2025-11-05 06:44:00+00:00): Laba diena. Privažiavimai neturi pavadinimų. Tik pati gatvė turi pavadinimą. Nurankiojau pridėliotus Gedimino, Uosių privažiavimų „pavadinimus“.
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:37:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
Patrik_B (2025-11-04 13:53:31+00:00): fixed shared nodes
NeisBot (2025-11-04 14:06:26+00:00): Hello CHS5290, welcome to OSM, and thank you for your contributions!

I've taken a look at your recent edits and wanted to discuss a few discrepancies I noticed regarding the surrounding environmental features. Specifically, the locations in your edits don't seem to align with the typical geographical characteristics expected in that area. Here are some (max 10) relevant links to the edits:
https://osm.org/way/1447415175
https://osm.org/way/1447415174
https://osm.org/way/1447415177
https://osm.org/way/1447415176
https://osm.org/way/1447415179
https://osm.org/way/1447415178

Could you please take a look?
Looking forward to your response.

#Somewhere
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=174195455
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:34:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
MassCartog (2025-11-04 15:17:46+00:00): Hi welcome to OSM. In this changeset you dragged many many nodes out of place. It was too many to fix so the whole changeset was reverted

https://i.imgur.com/pngOHWJ.png

Please be carful not to drag nodes around that you dont mean too. And if there are errors please dont publish them until you fix them. Thanks
NieWnen (2025-11-05 12:06:27+00:00): Poi tej zmianie płot przecina drogę. Jest tam brama, czy droga się urywa?
aaronq227 (2025-12-01 19:00:00+00:00): Hi boocha34,

I noticed you have been changing ref tags throughout Lesotho to Bxxxx and Cxxxx. This format stands out to me as it doesn’t follow typical highway reference numbering systems like the A routes throughout Lesotho (example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15478101). I was hoping you could provide more information about these changes since I have not been able to track down any resources that confirm these highway references. Would you be able to share the resources you used to make these edits (i.e. Mapillary, highway signs, or a government document)? Thank you!
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:38:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:36:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
ICT_maps (2025-11-04 21:47:07+00:00): Just a heads up you dragged a parking aisle a couple blocks to the north.
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:38:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
janhals (2025-11-04 14:52:51+00:00): niet Bredestraat, maar Burchtstraat
Frans S (2025-11-06 11:19:13+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping. Your mappings are accurate and squared.
However, you did not map the gray/brown round and rectangular buildings.
Please map them as well next time.
Best regards and keep mapping
Bernhard W (2026-02-12 06:21:52+00:00): > Keine ausgewiesenen Einbahnstraßen, daher Attribut entfernt
Beispiel: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/775359599
brouter hat mich heute in den Gegenverkehr geroutet, das ist gefährlich!
Solche Wege dürfen nur in einer Richtung mit Fahrzeugen benutzt werden, das steht bereits in der StVO. Schilder sind nur notwendig, wenn man auch in der Gegenrichtung fahren darf. 
StVO § 2 Straßenbenutzung durch Fahrzeuge, Abs. 4: "Linke Radwege ohne die Zeichen 237, 240 oder 241 dürfen
nur benutzt werden, wenn dies durch das allein stehende Zusatzzeichen „Radverkehr frei“ angezeigt ist."
Bitte  alle falsch geänderte umgehend korrigieren.
muralito (2025-11-04 17:46:58+00:00): Hi. Mapping these suburbs as polygons is not a good choice as boundary is diffuse and unofficial.
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:37:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
mueschel (2025-11-08 10:08:30+00:00): Hi,
what does 'name:yandex' mean? This tag isn't used in any other place.
Frans S (2025-11-11 09:13:32+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please square each rectangular building you map.
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2025-11-11 08:36:41+00:00): Hello, Thanks for mapping. 
A few remarks about your mappings
The buildings you mapped are rather accurate, however, not squared. Each building (rectangular) ought to be squared with the Q key while selected.
You did not map the round buildings. They are part of the job.
Keep that in mind for the next mapping session.
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2025-11-11 08:40:16+00:00): And, don't oversize the buildings. Most of them have an overhanging roof, so the building itself is smaller. Stay within the rooflines please.
Best regards
BCNorwich (2025-11-04 18:36:27+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Your new highway Carella Way was joined to the power line. I've unjoined it so folk won't be shocked!

Regards Bernard.
NeisBot (2025-11-04 15:21:42+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Roofing company in Raleigh NC"
NeisBot (2025-11-04 15:21:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-11-08 21:55:55+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/174396023
Hung Tran 9x0 (2025-11-04 15:23:33+00:00): ý tôi là ngõ 130 hồ tùng mậu, không hiểu sao gõ nhầm thành mai dịch
Filip009 (2025-11-05 10:34:56+00:00): Zdravím, cyklotrasa je jednosmerná? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37787805
Frans S (2025-11-06 13:56:17+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Not all buildings were mapped. The round and rectangular (gray/brown) buildings ought to be mapped as well.
I mapped them. 
Please do not oversize buildings.
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2025-11-05 11:30:04+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
In general, well mapped.

Please do not oversize the buildings. Mostly they have an overhang of the roofs, thus stay within the rooflines and do not include a shadow to a building

Best regards and keep mapping
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:36:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
flex16 (2026-03-21 14:06:02+00:00): Ich hab hier mal ein Issue erstellt beim Friedhof: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5213791#map=15/50.54397/9.64039&layers=N

Schreibe hier nochmal ein Kommentar, damit du es schneller siehst.

Hab gerade mal die Friedhofssatzung gechecked. Fahrradfahren ist dort verboten.
vgl: https://www.fulda.de/d67/10_Hauptamt/fuldaer_ortsrecht/6_Bauwesen/67.1_Friedhofssatzung_der_Stadt_Fulda_2021.pdf

§ 6 Abs. 2 lit. b.)
m_fuhrmann (2026-03-21 19:02:19+00:00): Also ein path mit bicycle=dismount?

Zur Not hätte ich hier noch mal vor Ort geschaut: https://panoramax.openstreetmap.fr/?background=streets&focus=pic&map=17.46/50.545515/9.643317&pic=642aa5ae-272a-4a60-8785-89b8970f2fd7&seq=859796d0-9a93-4514-a37f-574dfd43b280&speed=250&theme=default&users=default&xyz=272.00/0.00/30
flex16 (2026-03-21 21:23:41+00:00): Naja du kannst dir ja dieses grüne Hinweisschild nochmal genau durchlesen. Ansonsten wäre ich hier einfach bei highway=footway to be honest. Ich finde, dass Radfahrer eigentlich auf einem Friedhof nichts zu suchen haben. Die Friedhofssatzung ist da ja eigentlich eindeutig.
m_fuhrmann (2026-03-27 19:57:30+00:00): In der Ordnung steht 'befahren' verboten. Schieben ist nicht fahren. Rechtliches Schlupfloch? Was sagst du? 😂🤪
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:38:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:36:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
Frans S (2025-11-06 09:21:19+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------

Issues found on your mappings

A: Inaccurate mapping. 
Issues found on your mappings

A: Inaccurate mapping. 
C: Collecting adjacent buildings and mapped it as 1 building.
E: Buildings not squared or rounded.

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174200439
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:37:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
SomeoneElse (2025-11-30 20:00:55+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!,

On this changeset you've used a "source=Google Maps" tag. We can't actually use that as a source in OSM because Google's licence doesn't allow it to be used here - it would cause real problems for the project if we were found to be using Google Maps as a source.
If this is somewhere that you are familiar with, then "source=local_knowledge" would be perfectly OK. If not, we'll have to undo this change.

Best Regards
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:38:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:37:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
Frans S (2025-11-06 13:16:08+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping. 
Your mappings are far oversized. Zoom in as far as possible and draw accurate along the rooflines.
Don't forget to square the buildings as well.
Best regards and keep mapping
atchisson (2025-11-06 10:34:49+00:00): Bonjour,

Comme évoqué dans un précédent changset, chaque champ a une fonction bien spécifique, et en particulier name=* de part sa visibilité. Si vous souhaitez indiquer aux autres contributeurs d'OSM qu'il manque des infos, utilisez fixme=*, qui est fait pour cela.

Notez que si une info n'est pas visible sur votre terrain / imagerie / source (dans le cas de la puissance des panneaux solaires par exemple), ce n'est absolument pas grave, aucune information n'est obligatoire.

Notez également qu'une même information peux exister sous forme de point, ou de polygone, vérifiez bien les deux avant de créer des doublons, comme pour Ligaya par exemple : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12913375997

N'hésitez pas à consulter le wiki dès qu'un doute existe, j'insiste 😄

Bonne cartographie
Frans S (2025-11-06 13:48:00+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please map more accurate, don't connect nodes to each other and square the rectangular buildings.
Best regards and keep mapping
Senihtu (2025-11-05 07:10:55+00:00): Guten Morgen!
in diesem Changeset hast Du die Buswendeschleife am Bahnhof Walldorf als service=driveway getaggt.
im Wiki steht "service=driveway beschreibt eine untergeordnete Ein- oder Auffahrt zu einem Wohn-, Geschäfts- oder Firmengrundstück."
Sobald da ein Linienbus fährt kann das doch nicht mehr zutreffen.
Oder nutzt der Bus diese Straße nicht mehr zum Wenden?
Gruß
Senihtu