piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
woodpeck_repair (2024-06-10 22:22:52+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 152471450, 152471594, 152472050, 152472111, 152472165, 152472308, 152472398, 152472504, 152472797, 152472892, 152473066, 152473118, 152473231, 152511721, 152512346, 152512753, 152513415, 152513820, 152514084, 152514302.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2024-06-12 17:32:37+00:00): Hi, good edit, but I think it's better to remove the hotel name from the building. We don't map the same thing twice in OpenStreetMap. It already exists as a node with a correct tourism=hotel tag, while the name on the building without such tag is... just the name of the building. Since here is a mess of connected buildings which have different shapes from Maa-amet, this would lead to less confusion.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-06-10 22:30:17+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Wydrzyn":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11970804461
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1191862216
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1191862219

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eisenwave (2024-07-24 15:33:33+00:00): In diesem changeset wurde in Pirna die Remscheider Straße 57 irgendwie halbkreisförmig gemacht. Das Gebäude sieht jetzt total falsch aus.
hasienda (2024-07-24 17:13:46+00:00): Klar ein Bearbeitungsfehler; ich war mit allen anderen Änderungen zig Kilometer östlich unterwegs - Entschuldigung, und Danke für die Beobachtung!
Korrektur erfolgte soeben mit
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154360530
BlueButterfly (2024-06-10 23:03:38+00:00): Correction: Source used was Esri World Imagery; Mapillary
❤️‍🔥 (2024-06-11 10:16:11+00:00): Hey, nice work, I noticed this edit since you clicked 'request review'. 

You might have noticed that some gardens are not visible, like https://osm.org/way/1291162453 If you want to try fix this, there is an advanced feature called 'MultiPolygons' which can solve the problem. To use this, select the pedestrian area and the garden, and press `c` to 'merge' them. This effectively punches a hole in the pedestrian area so the garden is visible. There's a good example of this just across the road: https://osm.org/relation/13631905
VLD549 (2024-06-27 06:02:06+00:00): Hi, why the name change from Overasselt en Hatertsevennen to Hatertse en Overasseltse Vennen? The site clearly shows it to be Overasseltse en Hatertse Vennen. 

I used the link you provided.

Thank you in advance!
PerpetualHiker (2024-06-10 23:43:58+00:00): Correction: Source used was Maxar SecureWatch Imagery 2024-02-14.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-06-10 23:40:20+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11970926247

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Aurora Collective (2024-06-11 00:05:56+00:00): Note: I forgot to mention in source that information has been taken from a business card. The address seems wrong when compared with the card, but that's what it says on it and I don't know what to do with it.
NorthCrab (2024-06-11 09:43:39+00:00): Hey! In this case it was due to the street name being typed all in lowercase, I already corrected it :-)
nevw (2024-06-11 01:52:21+00:00): Hi, welcome to osm.
Consider adding leisure=pitch to all these instead of the shop.
nevw (2024-06-11 01:55:09+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport=free_flying
leisure=pitch can be added to a node or circle if bounds of the area are not known
fortera_au (2024-06-11 02:12:45+00:00): Are these all signed with the name "Paraglider launch", or is that just a descriptive name that should be removed/moved to description?
spritee (2024-06-11 02:50:05+00:00): THanks, will fix the type (misleading label in osmand application) and add some unique names
akimapbuilder (2024-06-11 06:06:32+00:00): Hi! I had to revert your changeset since there is no building in sight.
ShelbyAT (2024-06-10 23:50:17+00:00): https://dovrefjell-sunndalsfjella.no/
Supaplex (2024-06-11 05:01:05+00:00): 為何要刪除商業區與地址點位?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152519869
RedAuburn (2024-06-11 00:26:00+00:00): oops didn't add area in this cs
tyfi (2024-06-11 00:34:02+00:00): Looking back at TIGER suggests that maybe development in this area was associated with dropping Route P? I didn't dig too much into the details because I'm completely certain it doesn't exist now.
tyfi (2024-06-11 00:34:48+00:00): I left the classification alone at tertiary. Feel free to downgrade if you feel it's needed.
Raquel Dezidério Souto (2024-06-23 05:35:12+00:00):  씨몽키
Do not delete place=farm or other feature that you do not know, please.
Edu1981 (2024-06-11 00:41:59+00:00): muy bueno www.mariachisdemedellin.com.co
KiloThree (2024-06-11 02:37:14+00:00): The plaza in Davis is not a cycleway. The sign at Grove street says that the bikeway continues on the other side of the square, the crossing at College has signs to dismount, the curb cut has the central business district "no bikes" marking. It is similar at Buena Vista
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152520666
cubbe8 (2024-06-11 02:43:39+00:00): Just fixed it.
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-11 06:43:38+00:00): Hi bhruno, welcome to OSM.

May we know the reason behind deleting more or less a complete district?

Thanks.

https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=152520707#16/-30.0074/-51.0337
DressyPear4 (2024-06-11 09:22:28+00:00): Revertido!
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-11 09:33:06+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/152533027

Thanks @ DressyPear4 !
bhruno (2024-06-11 09:47:42+00:00): It was a mistake, but I don't know how to undo it. Sorry
MxxCon (2024-06-18 00:45:15+00:00): Should this be leisure=garden as documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgarden or simply landuse=flowerbed or man_made=bioswale?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152520741
MxxCon (2024-06-18 00:45:38+00:00): Same question regarding this "garden" as the last one..
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152520754
IraGersh (2024-06-18 00:50:07+00:00): Same answer.

I think its just a garden.  Personally, I'd just call it a planting, but not up to me.  It really fits that definition.  Bunch of shrubs.  No flowers.  Certainly not a bioswale.
MxxCon (2024-06-18 00:56:16+00:00): In that case landuse=shrubs or landuse=grass sounds more appropriate.
IraGersh (2024-06-18 02:09:34+00:00): Ok.  I'll change both to landuse=shrubs.
aharvey (2025-01-16 21:00:20+00:00): This has been reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161433740 since it seems they do exist in some form on the ground. Tag improvements welcome.
InsertUser (2024-06-18 17:52:44+00:00): Where was this mechanical edit discussed?
nyuriks (2024-06-18 22:41:55+00:00): thx for looking at it. This was a manual edit (i looked at each item one by one, verifying it). The tool i used to find these is what generated the comment (I should have updated it before saving but forgot)
Mr Matt K (2024-06-25 15:42:20+00:00): What is this? There is no such facility proposed here (peak NIMBY area) and a lot of other edits from this user appear to be spam / fake
jumbanho (2024-06-11 14:30:57+00:00): Hi, thank you for adding features to the map and asking for review.  It appears that you have added a short trunk highway in the middle of what appears to be a field.  I this what you intended?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152521222
jumbanho (2024-06-11 14:34:06+00:00): Hi, thanks for your efforts in editing the map.  In this changeset, you remove the bridge tags from two ways that appear to be bridges and added the tags to a way that goes under these bridges.  Is this what you intended?

Also, please use changeset comments that detail what you are changing and other details so that other editors can better understand the edits.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152521256
citrula (2024-06-11 03:20:29+00:00): What is "Guymon Highway"? Can you provide some evidence that this highway exists at all?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152521396
iandees (2024-06-11 03:15:11+00:00): Hi there! Thanks for improving the map.

Please note that when we trace buildings we want to trace the *base* of the building, not the roof line. Some of the adjustments you made to these building outlines moved the building away from the base to the roofline. When imagery is taken off-center and projected onto the flat map, the building will appear to "lean". More information about this effect can be seen here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Roof_modelling#Typical_errors_in_the_interpretation_of_roof_geometry_from_aerial_images

Also, it's very useful to add entrance information, but there are specific tags for that and the information shouldn't be left in the "name" field. Please look for the "Entrance" preset in the map editor and put the address information in there instead.
Doug Shidell (2024-06-12 16:49:29+00:00): Thanks for the information and I apologize for the mistakes. It appears that you have corrected the errors. Thank you.
iandees (2024-06-12 16:51:25+00:00): Oh yep, I forgot to mention that I had resolved the issue. Thanks for checking!

Keep up the great work, thank you for making changes to the map.
KiloThree (2024-06-11 03:15:35+00:00): Did you just revert your fixes to the ways in Davis? It looks like this has retagged them incorrectly as cycleways
KiloThree (2024-06-11 04:00:23+00:00): I have corrected those removed pedestrian tags in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152522340
MxxCon (2024-06-18 00:58:38+00:00): Hello.
What is the source of you deleting so many features in LaGuardia airport?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152521609
citrula (2024-06-12 21:18:30+00:00): I reverted your edits because you are adding fictional features to the map.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152605987
Sushant852 (2024-06-11 03:21:49+00:00): https://localbodydata.com/village-Baniyatola-537893
oba510 (2024-06-15 08:13:48+00:00): Were all the "Private Property No Trespassing", "Private Street Not For Public Use", and "Private Property No Trespassing No Soliciting" signs taken down around these three complexes?

If so, these streets would still be access=permissive at best since they're privately owned.
SirCowMan (2024-08-20 23:06:00+00:00): Head's up - in this case, it should not be expanded. Note "St. John's" is specifically indicated on the OSM abbreviations page (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Abbreviations).
SirCowMan (2024-08-20 23:20:12+00:00): As a follow up, note I've set it back (and updated the population); just as I'd like to get the correction into map data quickly .. it kind of shags up address searches, navigation, things like geotagging. Hope you don't mind! :)
NicaTopo (2024-06-11 16:00:27+00:00): Hi,

Your building shapes are far bigger than the building shown on the aerial image. I'm going to delete them.

Please narrow down the shape to the imagery. Thanks.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-06-08 15:21:26+00:00): Can you take a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4795843 ?
Caleb NHVR (2025-06-15 23:32:16+00:00): Hi Mateusz, I'll aim to have a look into this one. In the meantime, this resource regarding a large upgrade of Pacific Motorway - close to Darhi Milgirr Road, could have suitable information. Cheers. https://www.nsw.gov.au/driving-boating-and-transport/projects/pacific-highway-upgrade
willkmis (2024-06-11 19:48:15+00:00): Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap! Thanks for adding this business to the map. However, I noticed a few issues with your edits, which I tried to correct in my past change, but that you seem to have switched back:
-Your description is very subjective, reading as if it were advertising or Search Engine Optimization. This is not what OSM's description= tag is for, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description#No_advertising. Please kindly refrain from adding this sort of thing to the description.

-You also added back the "keywords" tag. This tag has no documented meaning in OSM. Are you aware of a service that uses these keywords, or one that is prompting you to add it to the shop? It would be useful for the community to know about.

-The value of the shop= tag is supposed to describe the type of product sold. There are quite a lot of possible values (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop#Shop-specific_information), but "Retail" does not really describe the type of shop. From the website it seems like LA Mart sells mostly decor, so I thought interior_decoration would fit, but maybe there's a more accurate value? If you could describe what is sold in a comment here, that would be helpful.

-A small detail, but the correct address format in OSM is to keep the street name alone in addr:street, whereas the unit number should go in addr:unit. It looks like you put the unit number back in the street name. Again, is there some service that's prompting you to do that?

Again, welcome to the community, and I hope we can work together to properly represent your business while conforming to OSM standards. Please let me know if there's anything I can help with!

Will
mavl (2024-06-11 13:39:53+00:00): Возможно, опечатка в фамилии.  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/98959961
miluethi (2024-06-11 15:47:00+00:00): Your building shapes are far bigger than shown on the aerial imagery. I'm going to delete them.
Please narrow down your shapes. One shape for each buildings. Thank you.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-06-16 21:27:43+00:00): Where did get the oneway status?
Bod_Ger (2024-06-17 12:27:47+00:00): Hi Spaghetti Monster

Thank you for making the corrections. I've mistakenly added one way tag. I will be more careful next time.
Kovoschiz (2024-08-23 05:40:39+00:00): Please only use `building=office` for buildings. `office=` should be used for actually offices inside.
miluethi (2024-06-18 15:51:13+00:00): Versha,

Some of your building shapes are far bigger than the aerial imagery. I'm going to delete them.
Frans S (2024-06-17 10:30:07+00:00): Hello.
About mapping of highrise buildings.
They ought to be mapped over the rooflines and move to the footprint.

Please check this clip how to map hem
https://drive.google.com/file/d/13RTwH7sChRWrG5bIjysF2ripBgh3F5l4/view?usp=drive_link
Best regards
Frans S (2024-06-17 10:36:10+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Inaccurate mapped.
Buldings not squared.

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152524442
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-11 06:07:32+00:00): Hi ShanawazK, welcome to OSM.

Your maps look like training data. Am I right?

Thank you.
Kai Johnson (2024-06-20 18:30:11+00:00): Could I ask for the reference you used to change this name back to Squaw Valley? Because when I check USPS, they have it as Yokuts Valley and they're only permitting the old name to be used for the transition to the new name.
s777n (2024-06-11 07:15:49+00:00): Здравствуйте. Зачем вы удалили теги с маркированной тропы? Она была отмечена как горный маршрут и обычный пешеходный навигатор не должен туда вести. Откатил вашу правку.
Alexey Vazhnov (2024-06-11 07:27:03+00:00): @romevik, thank you for awesome change description!

@s777n, let's be more polite to newbies ;) I believe @romevik will be a good mapper, especially if community will guide him.
romevik (2024-06-11 07:33:44+00:00): @s777n, sorry, I’m just figuring it out =)
NorthCrab_upload (2024-06-11 06:10:26+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11971331616
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11971331617
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1291212558
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1291212559

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
infeeeee (2024-06-11 10:33:42+00:00): Szia! Üdv az OpenStreetMapen!

Utcáknak nem szoktunk irányítószámot adni, épületeknek, cím pontoknak vagy egyéb POIknak inkább. Wikiben itt vannak összeszedve hogyan kell címezni: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hungary/Jelölési_példák#Címek

Ha kérdésed merülne fel, a magyar szerkesztő közösség elérhetőségeit megtalálod ezen az oldalon: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hungary/Közösség

További jó térképezést!
Langlaeufer (2024-06-12 07:41:22+00:00): Hallo Stadt-Dassel. Ist das ein reiner Radweg (Verkehrszeichen 237) oder ein gemeinsamer Rad- und Fußweg? Ist der Weg mit Verkehrszeichen beschildert oder nicht?
Grüße Langläufer
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152526321
Langlaeufer (2024-06-12 08:00:13+00:00): Ich habe das Tagging mal angepasst.
Bitte keine Linien übereinander zeichnen. Der Radweg nutzt offenbar den Feldweg. Der Name scheint sich eher auf eine ausgeschilderte Radroute zu beziehen. Für Routen lassen sich Relationen anlegen. Ich habe zunächst die einfachere Methode gewählt und lcn=yes (local cycle network) an den Weg gesetzt. Wie sind die Wege befestigt? Verdichtet? Asphalt? Betonpflaster? Bei Fragen, gerne hier antworten.
Grüße
Langläufer
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152526321
jhaluska80 (2024-06-12 00:31:51+00:00): How did Lyft find such a minor change so fast?  Does Lyft have an automated GPS trace to compare against the map for differences?  Do drivers report errors?  AI analysis?  Random spot check?
kmarkish_lyft (2024-06-12 12:21:54+00:00): Hi, jhaluska80! 
My name is Kate, and I’m a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. 
While working on the project, we received data that the certain tags which are important for routing have been changed recently. According to our workflow, we monitor edits with these tags in order to quickly identify and eliminate potentially incorrect and vandalized edits in OSM. We only make changes if we have sufficient evidence to justify fixing errors.
You can read more about Lyft's contributions to OpenStreetMap in this article - https://eng.lyft.com/keeping-osm-fresh-accurate-and-navigation-worthy-at-lyft-f27589ad1463

Best Regards
Hungerburg (2024-06-11 10:05:54+00:00): Hallo Mattia, Das Luftbild von dem du abgezeichnet hast ist veraltet. Ich werde die Änderung rückgängig machen.
Herwescheluc (2024-06-11 07:08:15+00:00): Wiederherstellung meiner vorherigen Bearbeitung nach Löschung durch anderen Mapper. Dieser hat alle Elemente gelöscht, die für eine Wiederverwendung nach dem Neubau zwecks Erhalt der History als razed und disused eingetragen waren und so außerdem verhindern sollten, das ein anderer Mapper versehentlich die abgerissenen Elemente als neu einträgt. Zwei Anfragen (über PN und CS) blieben ohne Reaktion, daher mache ich das nun rückgängig!
MarinoBM (2024-06-11 22:22:04+00:00): Hola nig82: En el contorno del edificio se describen sus características generales. El número total de plantas y la altura total de este. ¿Por qué dices que el edificio tiene solo 1 planta y 8 metros de altura cuando una de sus partes tiene 11 plantas y 44 metros de altura?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/135887758
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1291219749
Se ha de hacer tal como indica la wiki. Te lo pongo otra vez para que lo compruebes.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Edificios_3D_sencillos#C%C3%B3mo_mapear
Un saludo.
BCNorwich (2024-06-11 11:13:37+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

There is access, (by your tags), to Way: 1193560233 so I've removed the access=no tag.

The railway platform being a linear feature is regarded as a footway, so there's no need for a separate footway. In any case you joined one end of your footway,Way: 1291220029, to a fence so it would not have been routable. I've removed the footway. If the platform had been mapped as an area then it would have been OK to map a footpath desire line across it. I hope this helps.

Regards Bernard.
literan (2024-06-12 17:20:34+00:00): кривой формат адрески. Нужно ставить пробел перед буквами

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%90%D0%B4%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%B0#%D0%9D%D1%83%D0%BC%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%B2
literan (2024-06-12 17:20:59+00:00): перед буквами, означающими строение (с) или корпус (к)
literan (2024-06-12 17:20:22+00:00): кривой формат адрески. Нужно ставить пробел перед буквами

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%90%D0%B4%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%B0#%D0%9D%D1%83%D0%BC%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%B2
aseidel (2024-06-11 10:52:52+00:00): Liebe ElisaMK,
bitte hier prüfen, ob maxwidth:physical=* für diesen Abschnitt angegeben werden sollte (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/721613109). Der Weg wird Richtung Bertha-von-Suttner-Straße erst an der Stelle, wo der Poller steht, in der nutzbaren Breite verringert. Das Maß geben Sie daher direkt am Poller (Punktobjekt) an, nicht an diesem ansonsten gleichmäßig breiten Weg (Linienobjekt). 
Danke und herzliche Grüße
Antje Seidel
#lgmaps
kapazao (2024-06-12 13:50:47+00:00): Hello, please do not use big poligons for different landuses. Try to separate each landuse to avoid problems with other elements and it will be easier to maintain.
Regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152527535
Reino Baptista (2024-06-12 15:41:56+00:00): Dear kapazao,
Thank you for your words.
I've already been adding the details inside the mentioned poligonal areas.
RB
literan (2024-06-12 17:18:14+00:00): кривой формат адрески

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%90%D0%B4%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%B0#%D0%9D%D1%83%D0%BC%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%B2
DetectiveConan (2024-10-06 11:01:11+00:00): damage the data

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157534200
DetectiveConan (2024-10-06 11:01:12+00:00): damage the data

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157534200
Nakaner (2026-01-16 12:46:10+00:00): Hallo,

du hast die Hausnummern Georg-Friedrich-Dentzel-Straße 16a und 18a ein zweites Mal vergebne, obwohl sie schon ein Haus weiter erfasst sind. Magst du das bitte vor Ort mal überprüfen? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1216239602 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/685084238

Viele Grüße

Michael
archie (2024-06-11 08:04:26+00:00): Hej, jag har reverterat denna cs. Denna väg är ingen genomfartsled och skall därför inte klassas som tertiary.