piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Glassman (2023-01-26 16:49:53+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.

I went ahead and added kerb and tactile pads for the crosswalks but that shouldn't impact routing. If you are using one of the OSM routers it likely that they haven't been refreshed with the latest edits. That can take a week.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131739500
Gonéo (2023-01-27 21:15:53+00:00): Attention, le parking était déjà présent (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/146574371). J'ai supprimé votre ajout qui faisait doublon.
Frans S (2023-01-31 12:38:39+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
A remark. You tagged a 3 mtr wide trace as a path. Please take into account that paths are mostly as narrow as 1,5 mtr max. This should be tagged as an unclassified highway,since it is a through way
See the wiki Highways Africa link on the instructions.
Best regards
gscholz (2023-01-27 07:27:25+00:00): Hi  bora can,
this changeset has destroyed the boundary relations of "Saros Körfezi", "Gelibolu Yarımadası Tarihî Millî Parkı" and "Αιγαίον Πέλαγος / Ege Denizi":

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=26.27689&lat=40.33722&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=131739702

I have just fixed this.
Guido
SekeRob (2023-01-27 08:34:42+00:00): Hi FinixFighter

The 'how' parking is actually parking:(left/right/both):orientation=....
4000 uses under new scheme just for the left side 
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/parking:left:orientation#chronology

ciao
FinixFighter (2023-01-27 09:09:28+00:00): Do you think putting the orientation of the parking directly in parking:left is also good? https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/parking:left#values
In fact, the "yes" value seems to be one of the less used.
SekeRob (2023-01-27 10:50:29+00:00): Here's the new street parking wiki. See section on orientation. parking:side is not intended for this.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Street_parking

ciao
FinixFighter (2023-01-27 14:16:42+00:00): As I understand it, we should use 'parking:left=lane' just for saying there's a parking lane, then add 'parking:left:orientation=*' for specifying the orientation. Fixing everything given by Osmose is going to be quite frustrating XD
Thank you for pointing this out anyway!
SekeRob (2023-01-27 14:38:36+00:00): Yup, the initial parking:side= is for where, what, the position section of the wiki and XD it is as Osmose still does not understand both nor does it when the orientation changes indicated by the changing 'marking' and I'm certainly not going to cut up a street because part is diagonal, parallel, perpendicular. 

TGIF
NorthCrab (2023-01-28 08:40:25+00:00): https://img.monicz.dev/-aSHhXd5efg

Witaj, uważaj aby nie przesuwać adresów w losowe miejsca. Jak przeszkadzają Ci one podczas edycji to wyłącz je używając filtrów na dole drugiej zakładki po prawej stronie edytora.

Pozdrawiam!
Vinber (2023-01-27 21:40:10+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue,
si vous en avez la curiosité, vous pouvez jeter un oeil ici 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:France/bienvenue

Bonne cartographie
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2023-01-27 11:53:47+00:00): Please keep the POIs near their respective entrances, otherwise routing may give you incorrect directions since it will snap to the nearest road instead of the nearest entrance. This case is not that bad but with large factories, it caused great problems in the past when analyzing accessibily to bus stops or pedestrian networks around the POIs.
Martin868 (2023-01-27 14:03:44+00:00): Je comprends. Je suis pas certain quel ;était le cas ici. Mais comme souvent les gens vont ajouter les tags sur le building  et non comme un POI séparé, dans le cas des édifices à usage unique. Je préfère personnellement les POI séparés du building de toute façon. Si le building a un point marqué par main_entrance est-ce que votre algorithme va en tenir compte ?
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2023-01-27 15:58:11+00:00): Dans notre cas, l'algorithme va chercher le tag entrance=main/shop/yes le plus proche du POI qui est à l'intérieur ou sur le contour du building dans lequel se trouve le POI. Si le POI n'est pas dans un building, il prend le routing:entrance=main/shop/yes le plus proche, avec une limite (normalement 100m), sinon, ça retourne une erreur/warning pour qu'on aille corriger. Dans le cas de cette bibliothèque, ça n'aurait rien changé, mais il y a des cas problématiques ailleurs qu'on a du corriger ou qu'on devra corriger. C'est particulièrement important dans les grands centres d'achats, pour lesquels on essaie de placer le POI très près de sa porte intérieure, qui peut être à des centaines de mètres d'une des entrées principales du bâtiment. Voir les Promenades Drummondville pour un exemple qu'on a complété avec précision en attendant que l'on créé de vrais plans intérieurs des bâtiments: https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=19/45.89957/-72.51724
Langlaeufer (2023-01-27 06:24:59+00:00): Hi werbuli,
meinst du mit access=destination auf Am Castrum "Betreten für Unbefugte nicht gestattet"? Die Lehrer hab ich mal entfernt, weil sie in "Anlieger" inbegriffen sind
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131741021
werbuli (2023-01-27 07:58:13+00:00): Moin Langlaeufer, ich glaube ich brauche deine Unterstützung. Die Straße Am Castrum kann nur über den Parkplatz erreicht werden. Vor der Straße Am Castrum  steht das Schild DE:250 mit Zusatz Anwohner und Lehrkräft frei. Mein Fehler: nicht access sondern vehicle hätte ich nehmen müssen. Die beiden  Poller in Höhe Turnhalle/Kita stehen auf der Straße so dass eine Durchfahrt für PKW zur Schulstr. nicht möglich ist. Würdest du bitte den oder die Fehler berichtigen ? Vielen Dank
Langlaeufer (2023-01-27 08:17:23+00:00): also mach ich vehicle=destination
weil Anwohner kennt OMS nicht nur Anlieger, in den Anliegern sind dann auch die Lehrer enthalten, aber leider auch Eltern. Aber da es ja keine Durchgangsstraße ist, ist das eigentlich irrelevant - rechtlich zählt eh nur das Schild an der Einfahrt..
Berichtige ich gleich. 
Frohes Mappen.
Langlaeufer (2023-01-27 08:26:52+00:00): Passt das so? https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131761568
demon_box (2023-01-26 20:06:52+00:00): ciao! hai pasticciato questo tratto del sentiero 503

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1011751298

da sac_scale=hiking  a
building=hiking  (!!!)

ti invito a porre più attenzione quando mappi.
grazie e buon mapping ;-))
p.s.: sistemo io
s8evq (2023-02-15 13:43:07+00:00): I don't agree with this edit concerning the GR 5, and I think I will revert it. Nobody around here calls it "De la mer du Nord à la Méditerranée". That's not the internationally accepted name of the GR 5.  If wanted, you can keep is as name:fr
jcr83 (2023-02-15 15:21:01+00:00): I'm sorry, but GR 5 is a reference, not a name. But i agree with you that the current name is not correct, it should be in a description tag. So I propose :
description= De la mer du Nord à la Méditerranée
reference=GR 5
and no name tag.
s8evq (2023-02-20 09:43:31+00:00): It seems like in France, it's uncommon to use the reference as name. In The Netherlands and Belgium, the reference is an integral part of the name. There's even a TV program about the route called like this  (https://www.vrt.be/vrtnu/a-z/gr5/).
So, we have a different approach in naming the route in the three countries where GR 5 goes. I think we should find common ground here. You can use name:fr=De la mer du Nord à la Méditerranée. I'm not a fan of just removing the name tag.
jcr83 (2023-02-20 17:43:21+00:00): Some misc infos:
- I've found on the FFRandonnée web site that the official name is "Le sentier de l'Europe" (The European path). Look at:
https://www.ffrandonnee.fr/randonner/sentiers/gr-5-le-sentier-de-l-europe .
I don't know where the name "De la mer du Nord à la Méditerranée" comes from.
- About using the "GR5" name or reference, there is a legal issue, because GR is a registered trademark of the FFRandonnée. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/France/Itin%C3%A9raires_p%C3%A9destres_GR%E2%84%A2_et_GRP%E2%84%A2 (in French).
hatul (2023-08-21 08:06:25+00:00): תודה על התרומה, האם יש שער שהוא סגור? כי לא סימנת שער.
בנוסף, השם לא מיועד להצגת מידע.
Dhike (2023-08-21 09:21:15+00:00): היה מי שסימן במפה שיש דרך במקום,
אלא שכאשר ניסיתי לעבור בה, גיליתי שאין אפשרות לעבור בה, אין דרך במובן המקובל,
פילסתי וחדרתי די בקושי לפרדס מגודר
שגם בו המעבר באותה עת היה קשה 
כי בוצע במקום גיזום מאסיבי
והפרדס היה בלתי עביר כמעט בגלל הגזם.

לפני הכניסה לפרדס ניסיתי לברר קיום מעבר לאורך הגדר,
אבל המקום שסימנתי כ"דרך פרדס, לפעמים לא עבירה" היה הרע במיעוטו
hatul (2023-08-21 09:42:11+00:00): אם כך צריך לסמן שיש שם חסימה. סתם גדר לא מפריעה לניתוב במפה.
בנוסף כדאי לפנות לוועדה לשבילי ישראל שיתקנו את השביל.
bartgron (2023-01-26 17:52:12+00:00): kosz na śmieci*
ftcat (2023-01-27 06:34:24+00:00): Hi wikilupe,

Can you tell me why you are changing the Wikipedia tags from the existing English page link to the German one?
wikilupe (2023-02-10 16:28:58+00:00): I just wanted to add it for German users
ftcat (2023-02-10 18:32:47+00:00): That is fine but it means you remove it for English users. As per the Wiki "Only provide, in normal circumstances, a link to a single Wikipedia article, which should be to the article in the primary (local) language for the subject. In some cases, links to articles in non-local languages can be appropriate." The official language in Zambia is English. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikipedia?uselang=en-GB. particularly the section on secondary languages, users can use the language links within Wikipedia to read the article in another language.
Patr1k_P (2023-01-27 15:22:23+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1056267809

to je nova budova, ktora este nie je na mozaike...ked niekedy uvidis ze tam je cerstva adresa, radsej to prever, nez to zmazes
mapperue (2023-01-27 16:03:19+00:00): Nevšimol som si to. Budem na to dávať pozor.
Patr1k_P (2023-01-28 00:05:47+00:00): Ok
lnked (2023-01-27 04:15:04+00:00): "If there is a space and possibly plastic marker posts, but no physical separation, this may be called a buffered bike lane. A buffered cycle lane is separated from the car lanes with extra space. This is still tagged as cycleway=lane but with cycleway:buffer=* added. A cycle track (mapped with a separate way) is separated from the road by curbs, parking lots, grass verges, trees, non-flexible bollards or another physical barrier, but is running parallel and next to the road." (Source: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway) Part of Armour does have this physical separation and I agree it may and should be mapped as a separate way. Simple, painted bike lanes are a not the same. If you strongly disagree, I once again suggest a discussion topic to get the community's input.
sannkc (2023-02-04 06:24:29+00:00): I concur with Inked's interpretation.  Lane markings alone do not justify a highway=cycleway tag.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-02-07 05:09:01+00:00): As per identical PMs just sent to both of you:

1. Please stop the edit wards immediately! Also please stop the endless arguments, and veiled threats, via your Changeset Comments.

2. Start a public discussion via either Talk US or US Slack to see the local communities opinion of how these paths should best be mapped.

3. Abide by that public decision!

Graeme Fitzpatrick,
OSMF Data Working Group
NorthCrab (2023-01-28 03:53:23+00:00): Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Wycofałem tą zmianę ze względu że jedyną zawartością było rysowanie po istniejących już odcinkach dróg. Nigdy nie rysujemy nakładających się dróg. Jeśli zmieniły się parametry danego highway, to należy go zmienić albo usunąć.

Dodatkowo, nazwy tras rowerowych powinny być umieszczane jaką część relacji a nie na poszczególnych odcinkach. Nazwa dotyczy całości trasy a nie kilkuset metrów odcinka. W dodatku, tak przygotowane relacje o wiele prościej jest utrzymać.

Pozdrawiam!
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-09 09:59:22+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10584706079/history has flag:type = commercial that was added in this edit
what was meant by flag:type=commercial ? How it differs from flag:type=advertising ?
Intrinsical (2023-06-06 18:14:12+00:00): (was reverted in changeset 132091705)
Baloo Uriza (2023-01-26 23:08:09+00:00): Is there a gate on this path now going north?  Or is it supposed to be on the road going west?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131743500
felipeeugenio (2023-01-27 01:26:09+00:00): ALonso, borraste condominios que estaban bien dibujados y los dibujaste tal como no hay que hacerlo. Porqué borras edificios con sus tags para ponerlos como nodos? comparten el edificio con otra tienda?
Por favor hacer ediciones mas detalladas en sus explicaciones.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131743630
Frans S (2023-01-31 17:29:28+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
Please tag places correctly by adding 1 node and tag it with place= .... (hamlet etc) 
When there are more than 4 buildings close together you can add a landuse=residential area around it.
Best regards
Crsi (2023-01-29 19:38:58+00:00): Hi :)
I would say that the building still contains a swimming pool, even though it's not used anymore. Instead of deleting the node for the pool, I would therefore suggest to add `disused:leisure=swimming_pool` to it instead. In theory, it could be re-activated pretty quickly. If the building is teared down in the future, or the swimming pool removed entirely, the node can be dropped.
Would you agree with that?
Kind regards, Crsi
Zeppelin001 (2023-01-30 06:22:47+00:00): I can agree to that, but reactivation is very unlikely, because of the new buidling of Gerolsbad and the state of the old building.
Crsi (2023-01-30 14:36:17+00:00): Well, that's true. Okay, then I just close my comment now. Thanks :)
Zeppelin001 (2023-01-30 17:39:29+00:00): I added your attribute. We can remove it, if it is really not present anymore.
Crsi (2023-01-30 20:33:35+00:00): Thanks :)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:07:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
bxl-forever (2023-01-27 09:14:41+00:00): Hello,

If you edit a cemetery in France and a road in Berlin, it is better to upload your change after changing one object before moving on to the other.  This will avoid creating huge bounding boxes covering half of western Europe in the same changeset.

That being said, I am not sure it is a good idea to add English translations to ordinary street names, unless they are official.  Incidently, Johannisberger Straße is a long street and is made of 5 different segments in OSM; you only added a translation for one of them, ignoring the 4 others.
itineris (2025-03-06 20:43:59+00:00): Szia!

Az "Ákoslika" barlangnak mi a forrása? Egyrészt valóban barlang, nem csak valami mesterséges üreg? Másrészt honnan van a neve?

Az Országos Barlangnyilvántartás nem tud semmiről a környéken.

Üdv:
Ákos
Diogenész (2025-03-06 21:36:36+00:00): Az ábrázolt "ojjektum" egy nagyon különleges mély, sakktáblaszerű hasadékrendszer a mészkőlemezben, a legmélyebb ponton (kb. 8m) egyértelmű víznyeléssel. A hasadékrendszer egyik pontján egy valószínűleg kifagyásos keletkezésű oldalüreg, amely egyértelműen megfelel a barlang definíciójának. De nem is ez, hanem a titokzatos hasadékrendszer az érdekes, a képződésére egyelőre nem tudunk megnyugtató elméletet. Az innen nyugatra található Kosboros barlangot évek óta bontjuk, amely az Ákoslika titokzatos szerkezetével rokon, de a megtalálásakor színig fel volt töltődve, csak egy kis nyílás utalt arra, hogy aktív víznyelő. A felső szinteken elaggott nagyméretű cseppköves rész volt, de lejjebb egyértelműen tektonikai eredetű, szintén sakktáblaszerű hasadékrendszerrel. Az "Ákoslika" nevet csak munkanévként adtam neki, ha valaki javasol egy jobbat, átírom...
itineris (2025-03-07 13:50:48+00:00): (Nemazénlikam.)

Ó, egy Plecotus barlangászhoz van szerencsém? Izgalmas sztori.
Strubbl (2023-01-26 21:28:53+00:00): Hallo 551127025789, 

es wäre super, wenn du die Flächen (Acker, Buschland, etc.) nicht mit Straßen verkleben würdest. Das heißt, dass die Fläche vor der Straße aufhört und sich keinen gemeinsamen Node teilt. Z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1135503938 geht laut deiner Kartierung nun bis zur Mitte der Straße, weil es den Node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10584714014 mit der Straße gemein hat. Außerdem wurde hier ein Acker über ein Buschland gezeichnet. Das ist auch nicht ok. Solch gleichwertige Flächen sollten nicht übereinander liegen.

Wenn du Flächen bearbeiten möchtest, würde ich dir wärmstens empfehlen den Editor JOSM zu benutzen. Damit gehen die Flächen nicht automatisch an die Straßen ran, sodass das Verkleben vermieden wird.

Viele Grüße
felipeeugenio (2023-01-27 01:22:53+00:00): Hola. Cuando las veredas están pegadas a la calle no se dibujan como footway, sino dentro de la calle misma como sidewalk=right/left/both. Por lo que conozco de Chonchi se tendrán que borrar todas esas veredas que dibujó.
por favor incorporarse al chat de la comunidad en Telegram para informarse de este tipo de convenciones..

Además: toda una calle como atractivo turistico?

gracias
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131745281
NorthCrab (2023-02-09 06:05:16+00:00): https://img.monicz.dev/-chR85sDnBf
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/300294118
Jaki jest powód takiej dziwnej zmiany w geometrii tego budynku
chris66 (2026-05-31 06:57:48+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1119932442

Ist das wirklich abgerissen? Ist auf aktuellen Luftbildern zu sehen. LG.
Strubbl (2026-05-31 16:33:58+00:00): Puh, 3 Jahre her. Das weiß ich nicht mehr wie das Luftbild da aussah. Aber von der Form her sieht es so aus als ob es das neue Gebäude ist. Ich habe das razed: entfernt.
mariotomo (2023-01-30 14:38:10+00:00): (hi again, thank you for your contributions. please do try to write more telling changeset descriptions. check the wiki for a more complete explanation: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments)
NorthCrab (2023-02-09 06:21:40+00:00): https://img.monicz.dev/-VCA4KTRMCu
Wycofane z powodu duplikacji informacji. Las jest już oznaczony. Nie oznaczaj lasu w lesie. Takiego czegoś nikt nie będzie utrzymywał.
AWaltrick (2023-01-26 20:15:15+00:00): Estrada local foi fechada pelo proprietário. Coletada as coordenadas do traçado da via pelo arquivo 2023_01_26_15_59_33_2023_01_26_15_59_33.gpx
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-02-26 15:01:30+00:00): I would propose to reconsider name of related:wikipedia as it may encourage people putting stuff like related:wikipedia=en:Building on every single building mapped in the city

maybe on_the_list:wikipedia?
mcliquid (2023-02-28 08:44:51+00:00): I've changed the tagging for both wikipedia and wikidata. Thanks!
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-02-28 14:14:48+00:00): Would it be fine for to change (semi)automatically also other related:wikipedia and related:wikidata tags you added and linking lists?
mcliquid (2023-02-28 14:38:52+00:00): Sure, I changed it everywhere where I was the last editor and "Liste" occurred in "related:wikipedia":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133131610
mariotomo (2023-01-27 08:00:18+00:00): hola, gracias por recuperar la etiqueta 'building' y añadir el nombre 'Puesto de Auxilio'. curiosidad: porqué pusiste y enseguida quitaste la referencia a la policía nacional? es otra entidad que maneja el puesto?
iamjosemom (2023-01-27 14:17:01+00:00): En realidad la policía nacional de Panamá es la entidad que maneja el puesto o edificio, pero no sabía si poner policía nacional de Panamá y por eso preferí por edificio.
gscholz (2023-01-28 07:41:46+00:00): Hi osmtogo_mapper4,
this changeset has creates errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=1.14476&lat=7.53852&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=131746972

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Violaine_Do (2024-09-30 23:53:14+00:00): Bonjour et merci pour tes contributions, pourrais tu à l'avenir, proposer un commentaire qui illustre tes modifications? Cela aiderait pour la validation. Merci!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131747268
Владимир К (2023-07-25 15:20:08+00:00): Добрый день.
Зачем вы удалили название ЖК c landuse=residential?
Руслан Т (2023-07-25 15:26:36+00:00): Здравствуйте! Он в отдельном мультиполигоне. В другом ченджесете вы это заметили)
cartofy (2023-02-14 09:47:18+00:00): Welcome to OSM. I see that you've been adding buildings and that's great but why have you drawn them so badly? You can very well see that buildings of the shapes you have drawn don't exist on the ground. There are 15 instances of buildings that crossed roads, and 13 instances of buildings crossing other buildings which I'm sure mapwithai would have alerted you to. Why have you ignored these? Please correct the edits you made or revert bad changes.
muzirian (2023-02-14 10:50:53+00:00): Hi Evila, please review and fix each object manually before adding from mapwithai. Have deleted this set of bad buildings, there are many others on different changesets, please check and correct them.

Thanks cartofy for review and comments.
bxl-forever (2023-01-27 09:19:25+00:00): Hello,

Thanks for spotting a new restaurant.

If a place changes, just edit the existing node and change the name and type.  Do NOT erase and create a new one beside, because you made a destructive edit (erasing a whole housenumber here).
Don’t worry, we fixed it this morning.

Have a nice day.
vbertola (2023-01-27 09:26:31+00:00): Ah, sorry. I saw all the tags (opening hours etc) and thought it'd be quicker to just erase and recreate, but didn't notice that you had the house number in it (in many other cities they are kept separate for this very reason). Thanks for fixing it.
ZLima12 (2024-07-22 03:09:02+00:00): Hi there,

It looks like you made a mistake with the speed limit on this way: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/826790148

Did you mean 35 mph instead of 435 mph?
Glassman (2023-01-29 17:35:23+00:00): #TIP: When adding a single address to a building, just select the building then fill in the address information for that building.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131748149
muzirian (2023-02-14 10:53:35+00:00): Hi Evila, please check and fix shapes before adding. please check and fix errors with other buildings.
https://osmcha.org/changesets/131748457?filters=%7B%22users%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%22Evila%22%2C%22value%22%3A%22Evila%22%7D%5D%2C%22date__gte%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%22%22%2C%22value%22%3A%22%22%7D%5D%7D.
Reverting this changeset
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131748457
NorthCrab (2023-01-28 08:47:58+00:00): Witaj, ten surface wygląda jak zwykły Ground albo Dirt, ale na pewno nie Sand. Piasek to w rozumieniu takim jak np. na plażach niektórych się znajduje. Wizualizacje różnych surface znajdziesz na https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:surface Nie jest to jakiś mega problem ale lepiej mapować poprawnie takie rzeczy :P

Pozdrawiam!