piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
GM3_2 (2026-03-25 14:36:29+00:00): This seems like it shouldn't be allowed. I submitted the entry for review, because I wanted to see the response. Can someone else take photo of the tree and make a local observation?
eggie (2026-03-25 06:39:17+00:00): reverted by changeset #180389115
eggie (2026-03-25 06:45:59+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback Alle begin is moeilijk. Om te beginnen heb je geen rijweg afgesloten voor alle verkeer, maar een administratieve grens. 
We sluiten geen wegen af met access=no als er wegwerkzaamheden zijn.
Dat doen we door het tijdspad in te bouwen. Dan gaat de weg weer automatisch open op de einddatum.
Duurt iets vele maanden dan kan een weg op construction worden gezet, maar is de tijd te overzien dan doen we dat dus met conditionaltagging.
Een voorbeeld. .. access:conditional=no @ (2025 Sep 20-2026 Apr 03) 
De hamvraag is dus .. Hoelang gaat dit duren? 

Ik heb je wijzigingen teruggezet middels revert. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-03-25 07:05:12+00:00): Gaat het over deze twee bruggen?
https://www.noord-holland.nl/Onderwerpen/Verkeer_vervoer/Projecten_Verkeer_en_Vervoer/Vervangen_vaste_bruggen_Medemblikkerweg_N240
eggie (2026-03-25 07:12:38+00:00): Situatie eind februari.
https://viewer.satellietdataportaal.nl/@52.77463,5.093300,17/?datastrip=20260225_SVNEO-04&sensorname=SuperView-NEO

De hulpdiensten zouden dan over de hulpbruggen gaan.
eggie (2026-03-25 07:24:47+00:00): Hoe zit het bij de  zuidelijke brug?
Is die al opgeleverd? 
Is die hulpbrug nog in gebruik?
Marmeije (2026-03-25 07:32:28+00:00): 1e brug buiten medemblik is nog niet af. De 2e verderop is gewoon te gebruiken. afslg Medemblikkersluisweg is ook te bereiken vanuit wieringerwerf
Marmeije (2026-03-25 07:34:17+00:00): hulpdiensten maken nog steeds gebruik van hulp brug
eggie (2026-03-25 07:40:41+00:00): Ik zal die hulpbrug intekenen voor fietsers en het fietspad openzetten voor hulpdiensten.
Dan kan LiveNav daar over routeren tot de Zuiderkwelweg. 
Dan gaat Er lopen ook fietsrouterelaties.
Dus geen beginnerswerk. 
Ik zal het stuk tussen de afslag Medemblikkersluisweg en het stuk N240 op construction zetten tot de Zuiderdijkweg. . 
Dat lijkt me voor nu het duidelijkst. Het gaat nog maanden duren. 
Maar even in de gaten houden. 
Ik heb even in Melvin gekeken, maar die site werkt momenteel anders en ik krijg geen duidelijke info.
eggie (2026-03-25 07:56:40+00:00): Nu aangepast. Paar keer CTRL-F5 toetsen voor het effect.
Het gaat nog zo lang duren dat ik het stuk  N240 op construction heb gezet. 
De emergency -yes staat op het fietspad tot aan de Zuiderkwelweg. 
Zie op de satfoto eind febr dat de T kruising met de Medemblikkersluisweg ook opgebroken is incl de fietsoversteek, maar dat kan nu al weer anders zijn
.  Up to you om het te checken.
Laat maar weten of het klopt. 
Groet,
eggie
Marmeije (2026-03-25 08:33:29+00:00): Ik ga al vanaf sluiting N240 over de a7 naar mijn werk. Wekelijks op zondag kijk ik altijd even de stand van zaken daar. De opbreking verderop geen idee.
eggie (2026-03-28 21:50:57+00:00): Volgens Melvin..
M502342: N240 Medemblikkersluisweg Middenmeer Bouw/Takel sloop brug en bouw nieuwe brug
Noord-Holland
17-11-2025 07:00 t/m 17-04-2026 16:00

Dan zou het half april al weer gereed zijn.
Zou dat kunnen kloppen?
Groet,
eggie
eggie (2026-03-30 06:49:05+00:00): Voor nu de weg op access:conditinal=no @ (2025 Nov 17-2026 Apr 17) gezet, want het zuidelijke deel gaat dan half april weer automatisch open in de routers. 

MVG,
eggie
eggie (2026-03-30 08:25:13+00:00): Typo access:conditional
rajdhani (2026-03-26 04:10:41+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:180435129
eggie (2026-03-25 06:38:16+00:00): reverted by  #180389078
eggie (2026-03-25 06:36:55+00:00): reverted by changeset #180389026
silversurfer83 (2026-03-25 07:42:04+00:00): Moin Steffen :)

du hast darum gebeten, dass sich jemand diese Änderung ansieht.

Im Großen und Ganzen ganz gut. Du hast nur beim alten Standort der Feuerwehr auch den building=* Wert komplett entfernt, was aus dem Gebäude erstmal eine Linie mit Adresse gemacht hat. Ich hab den Wert jetzt auf building=yes gesetzt, damit es erstmal wieder passend dargestellt wird.

Bei Fragen immer raus damit

silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180379924
klik (2026-03-30 09:05:45+00:00): Moin Steffen, wir hatten ja schon mal zu dem Thema gesprochen. 
Du hast jetzt die Addresse an einen einzelnen Punkt innerhalb des neuen Gebäudes gehängt. Ich hätte diese Adresse dem Gebäude gegeben. Wobei ich nicht sicher bin, ob die Adresse wirklich mit der der Turnhalle identisch ist.
Für die Feuerwache selbst, also amenity=fire_station und name= Freiwillige... hätte ich noch das gesamte Gelände als Fläche eingezeichnet, dann wäre die Ausdehnung klarer.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180379924
Joseph R P (2026-04-04 03:24:02+00:00): Bend Parkway should not be tagged as highway=motorway since it has at-grade intersections, crosswalks, and bike lanes, which would disqualify it from being a motorway by OSM's standards.
chath_tsu (2026-04-15 01:20:47+00:00): reverted this
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181346002
World_Winner (2026-03-25 11:08:51+00:00): Reverted in changeset id: 180401800
AndersAndersson (2026-03-25 11:30:52+00:00): Hello
This changeset added an empty node in Norway. Shall it be removed or will you add information to it?
AndersAndersson (2026-04-02 15:24:17+00:00): No answer. I removed the empty node in Norway.
ralley (2026-03-24 23:46:12+00:00): Please don't tag descriptions in the name field, it is for proper names only: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180380595
Hufkratzer (2026-03-24 23:30:43+00:00): Die die Changeset-Diskussion, auf die ich im Kommentar verlinken wollte, ist:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180164413
CAM-Gerlach (2026-03-25 06:21:51+00:00): Hi, in changeset 180388256 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180388256 , I reverted the beach way boundary change for now, as it inexplicably expanded the small, appropriately mapped pebble beach you'd added previously to cover almost the entire water surface of the lower Virginia Tech Duck Pond and some area around it with said beach, while also giving said "beach" the name "Duck pond[sic]" (which is instead a water feature, already mapped in detail). By contrast, from your changeset comment what you apparently intended to do was fix the water area way boundary near the beach to be less inland, which indeed appears quite warranted given current imagery as well as your previous mapping, but which was not in fact done as the Duck Pond natural=water outer way was essentially untouched. Accordingly, I went ahead and made that change for you as you apparently intended in the changeset above, as well as refined the outer way in a few other spots. Let me know if you have any questions or further feedback on this. Thanks!
MappingMore (2026-03-26 10:25:22+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:180446333
MappingMore (2026-03-26 14:18:12+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:180456199
rajdhani (2026-03-26 06:12:05+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:180437498
rodolfovargas (2026-03-25 23:52:03+00:00): Buen mapeo. Considera ESCUADRAR los edificios (aplica Q en el teclado)
Continua con tus aportes.
NeisBot (2026-03-25 00:54:48+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13676560526 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Dental clinic"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-02 04:33:06+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180748266
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-17 01:41:45+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with advertising/malformed tags and explicit source=* of Google Maps, which is not allowed by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ), in changeset 184205117

https://osm.org/changeset/184205117
ralley (2026-03-25 23:46:02+00:00): What is your source for the name here? I don't remember any signage
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180382217
rodolfovargas (2026-03-26 13:43:24+00:00): Buenos aportes. 
Geometriza los EDIFICIOS (forma rectangular). Generaliza el trazo (no dibujes los quiebres pequeños). Aplica ESCUADRAR los edificios. 
Continua Colaborando.
rodolfovargas (2026-03-26 13:53:42+00:00): Buen aporte. Si un elemento está mal mapeado, puedes modificarlo, mejorarlo, o reemplazarlo.
Continua mapeando.
melbournefan (2026-04-20 08:25:33+00:00): Hi, can I ask where you obtained the data from? did you survey the area?

Also your tags relating to the Box Hill RSL appear to be incorrect
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180382836
rodolfovargas (2026-03-26 01:16:55+00:00): Considera aplicar ESCUADRAR a los edifiios (Q en el teclado).
bxl-forever (2026-05-02 12:11:04+00:00): ## REVERTED CHANGESET
I wish to inform you that we had to undo this change, as well as some others.

Here is the reason. Most of the restaurants here are mapped as nodes (i.e., floating points). This is a correct way to map businesses. In this change, you added amenity=restaurant tag to the building hosting those businesses. This created unwanted double tagging because the map now sees two restaurants for each building (one for the building and one inside the building). It caused very funny rendering here but this is definitely not wanted.

I spent some time cleaning up the situation in this area.  If you have local knowledge of the current situation of those restaurants, hairdressers, banks and various amenities, feel free to update with recent data, but only edit the nodes (aka "Points" in the online iD editor) and not the buildings.

(Changes on the OSM database are public, and unfortunately you described all of your changes so far as "mean cities", which does not help anyone to understand what you are really doing.  Please have a look at this documentation page, which explains why it is important that everyone correctly describe one’s changes to the map: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments)
Alexey Lukin (2026-05-01 15:16:55+00:00): I'm afraid that your tagging of subway stations is not in line with OSM recommendations. You can find the current recommendations here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Metro_Mapping

For example, railway=station should be a node, not an area.

Are you able to revert or fix your change to comply with the schema?
maro21 (2026-03-26 17:51:34+00:00): Jakie jest źródło tej edycji? Czy ta mechaniczna edycja była dyskutowana i ma stronę na Wiki? Czy zapoznałeś się kiedyś z https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct?
Adikso (2026-03-26 22:05:17+00:00): Była dyskutowana na discordzie. To nie jest automated edit. Każda zmiana polegała na tym że wybierałem co ma się zmienić i każda zmiana była weryfikowana przeze mnie. Nie klasyfikuje się to do "this policy covers all edits where changes are made to objects in the database without review individually by the person controlling the edits". Nie jest to też "change tagging of a large number". Po prostu zamiast przeklikiwać się po każdym poi miałem tabelkę z której wywalałem tagi.
maro21 (2026-03-28 18:02:11+00:00): Gdzie jest strona na Wiki o tym i pozostałe wytyczne?
Jakie jest źródło tej edycji?
W jaki sposób weryfikowałeś, byłeś we wszystkich tych miejscach?
Adikso (2026-03-28 22:54:51+00:00): Przeczytaj mój wcześniejszy komentarz, który wyjaśni ci dlaczego nie musi być strony na wiki i dlaczego nie jest to import. 

Na podstawie informacji prasowych o tym że lokale North Fish się zamykają, oraz tego że spółka ogłosiła upadłość, nie działa już strona internetowa, aplikacja oraz dostawy - co daje dużą pewność że biznes się zawija, to grupa społeczności OSM na Discordzie zdecydowała że usuniemy wszystkie lokale, bo zanim zweryfikujemy wszystko w terenie lokal po lokalu to będą nieistniejące lokale wisiały kilka lat.
ralley (2026-03-25 23:44:06+00:00): Please don't tag descriptions in the name field, it is for proper names only: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180380595
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180383341
World_Winner (2026-03-26 09:08:46+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: 180443503
Glassman (2026-03-25 18:19:48+00:00): #TIP: it nice to leave a changeset comment. I may help you and others in the future.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180383727
Alliegaytor (2026-03-25 04:56:28+00:00): proposed:building=yes is probably what you're looking for (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:proposed:*)
LachlanTansey2009 (2026-03-25 07:08:47+00:00): Thank you for suggesting this
007Transformer (2026-03-26 10:11:04+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:180445847
willkmis (2026-03-26 01:42:26+00:00): Out of curiosity (since I've often wondered about these etymologies) what was your source for these? Most seem at least plausible, although Kennedy St seems doubtful... https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/996627037. I think the street was called that before JFK: https://cinematreasures.org/theaters/7498.
whammo (2026-03-26 10:35:38+00:00): A lot of searching, which I'll admit I didn't do for the presidential-sounding ones and maybe caught me out on Kennedy (Monroe, Madison, Quincy, Adams, etc) so thanks for flagging that. There are a surprising number of resources about DC's street names (including Ghosts of DC, Smithsonian Magazine, neighborhood historical associations), but none are even close to comprehensive.
NeisBot (2026-03-25 03:18:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 8 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1492461209 v1 | 8 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180384316
TheSwavu (2026-03-25 04:16:11+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180385263
NeisBot (2026-03-25 03:27:39+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 34 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1492461960 v1 | 34 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180384402
TheSwavu (2026-03-25 04:16:02+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180385263
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:08:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
Alliegaytor (2026-03-25 04:52:34+00:00): Adding razed railway (especially nearly 30 years ago razed) is dubious and generally out of scope of OSM. We tend to map things that exist and are verifiable, but I understand that nonexistent railways are sometimes excepted from this rule.

While I'm not too familiar with this, I implore you to check out OpenHistoricalMap https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/about https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenHistoricalMap, its for mapping things that have existed at any point within the world, even if they are long gone. I'm sure they'd love these kinds of contributions!
LachlanTansey2009 (2026-03-25 07:08:18+00:00): Thank you for this suggestion
NeisBot (2026-03-25 03:39:39+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 12 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1492461209 v2 | 8 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1492465173 v1 | 4 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180384634
TheSwavu (2026-03-25 04:15:47+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180385263
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-25 06:43:32+00:00): Thanks @TheSwavu
ajmat (2026-03-26 07:39:11+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: 180440352
rodolfovargas (2026-03-26 13:48:34+00:00): La clave: landuse=residential aplica para áreas urbanas o construidas (conjunto de edificios). No aplica para edificios individuales de apartamentos, condominios, residenciales. Para nuestro caso mapeamos todo como EDIFICIOS.
Continua aportando.
ajmat (2026-03-26 07:12:21+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: 180439546
ajmat (2026-03-26 12:56:09+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: 180452486
Wildsharky (2026-03-29 12:24:08+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:180437410
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:10:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
Kovoschiz (2026-03-25 08:15:56+00:00): Please don't use `=village` for small insignificant unimproved villages. And when it's multiple villages, use `=suburb` first (or `=quarter` when inside another `=suburb` already).
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:00:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
iandees (2026-03-25 08:05:09+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6242482473 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180392972, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
stasiu512 (2026-03-25 10:18:57+00:00): Cześć, proponuję poprowadzenie unclassified zamiast ul. Nad Stawem dalej ul. Kilińskiego do ul. Kościuszki. Ul. Nad Stawem w stronę Kościuszki jest praktycznie nieużywana - nie da się z niej skręcić w lewo, do tego ruch od strony al. Legionów i dalej ul. Kościuszki skręca w ul. Kilińskiego w kierunku Galerii Metropolia, czy Dworca PKP. A od al. Żołnierzy Wyklętych mało kto skręca w Nad Stawem w kierunku Dworca PKP ponieważ skręcają wcześniej w ul. Dmowskiego przy Galerii Bałtyckiej. https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_car&route=54.383594%2C18.606312%3B54.385425%2C18.601495
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_car&route=54.386299%2C18.606194%3B54.383457%2C18.606377
theDM (2026-03-25 17:14:15+00:00): Cześć, większość ruchu, zwłaszcza do Metropolii, nie jedzie przez Nad Stawem?
L'imaginaire (2026-03-28 09:26:23+00:00): Dag Tom,
Als ik het goed begrijp, heb je hier het grondgebruik aangepast volgens de perceelsgrenzen van het GRB. Ik zie op luchtfoto's echter geen overeenkomst tussen de perceelsgrenzen van het GRB en de situatie op het terrein (en die laatste krijgt normaal voorrang in OSM). Wat is jouw kijk hierop?
Tom Ameye (2026-03-28 09:46:09+00:00): Ik heb daar wat gekarteerd omdat het in de buurt van Ursel luchtmachtbasis ligt. Blakkeveld is nog heel onvolledig gekarteerd.  Mijn kijk: zowel GRB, luchtfoto's, RUPs, etc. zijn allemaal belangrijke bronnen voor het karteren.  mvg Tom
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:12:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:00:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:09:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-17 01:40:49+00:00): Reverted adding SEO POI with an explicit source=* of Google Maps, which is not allowed by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ), in changeset 184205091

https://osm.org/changeset/184205091
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 08:59:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:08:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:09:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
rodolfovargas (2026-03-26 00:31:55+00:00): Hola Mikel. Buenos aportes. Los edificios son muchos quiebres, es válido GENERALIZAR el dato. Para más detalle se puede aplicar imágen de UAV-DRON.
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:12:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 08:58:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
rajdhani (2026-03-25 05:06:01+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:180386259