piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse2 (2024-02-26 23:46:12+00:00): Hello,
There are a few "meadow=padd" around here - see https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1HSE .  Is that a misspelling of "paddock"?
Best Regards,
Andy
Palgrave Peter (2024-02-27 15:41:31+00:00): Hi, Thanks for this info. I thought I'd only made a few errors like this, but it was lots! All corrected now.
vasony (2023-12-18 20:17:27+00:00): Szia!

Itt melyik a jó az egyik fele az utcának Óvodaköz a másik Óvoda köz?

Tamás
efi99 (2023-12-18 20:24:51+00:00): Egyben a jó.
Alsó felén nincs házszám, azért maradt el a kijavítása.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-12-09 18:55:34+00:00): więc usuwam noname=yes
user_5359 (2023-12-11 16:02:18+00:00): Hallo! Bitte sieh Dir mal http://www.osm.org/way/189331545 (ein von zwei Objekten) an. Was ist die Bedeutung des Tag roof:lL = 1? Meinst Du roof:levels=1?
hertipau (2023-12-14 15:14:18+00:00): Hallo! Flüchtigkeitsfehler... Hab´s bereits korrigiert. THX
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-12-09 18:55:37+00:00): więc usuwam noname=yes
tyfi (2023-12-09 19:06:52+00:00): Bbox is large b/c added layer=5 to power line
tyfi (2023-12-09 19:13:36+00:00): This is essentially a continuation of changeset 144945397.
Michi (2024-01-08 23:28:18+00:00): Ich glaub' beim Namen des Geschäfts ist da was schiefgelaufen. 😉
user_20554852 (2024-01-11 15:10:52+00:00): anstatt es zu fixen, ne das wäre ja arbeit. .....
Michi (2024-01-12 15:42:38+00:00): Es gibt einen alten Spruch, der besagt: "Aus Fehlern lernt man." Das trift besonders auf neue Useraccounts zu. Das ist schlicht ein wesentlicher Bestandteil des Lernprozesses und nicht böse gemeint. 👍
l3BAM (2023-12-22 17:18:38+00:00): Bonjour,
C'est étrange cette modification car tous les courriels et le site Web indiquent bien 10h-19h tous les jours sauf le dimanche comme heures d'ouverture
DaveF (2024-04-28 15:00:57+00:00): Hi
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1229471487

This isn't a building. Could you please amend & check if you've made similar mistakes elsewhere.
Matt_ (2023-12-09 19:35:20+00:00): Please see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/US_National_Inventory_of_Dams
Matt_ (2023-12-09 19:37:01+00:00): And also: https://maproulette.org/browse/challenges/42589
muchichka_s (2023-12-11 17:29:41+00:00): Доброго дня. А звідки дані? Їх точно можна імпортувати в OSM?

На скільки я знаю дані Навітел не можна імпортувати в OSM
ti-lo (2024-03-24 14:22:23+00:00): Seems legit https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_Rider#Landing
MattGPS (2024-03-24 17:31:21+00:00): That Wikipedia article photo shows a NASA vehicle landing somewhere in a USA desert.
ti-lo (2024-03-25 18:22:32+00:00): That's what I meant with "legit" : not a giant paved circle (or "runway"). Just double-checked what "Space Rider" is :-)
DD1GJ (2023-12-12 09:48:06+00:00): Hallo Bergmaus, danke für Deine Ortskenntnisse. Ein Löschen bringt gar nichts, denn der Weg ist auf allen Luftbildern deutlich sichtbar und in Laufe der Zeit stellt ein anderer Mapper oder eine KI fest, dass da ein Weg auf der Karte fehlt. Dann ist er wieder drin ohne jede weitere Warnung. Daher habe ich Deine Löschung und sonstigen Eintragungen bezüglich des Hundes rückgängig gemacht. Ich habe die Wege auf dem Hofgelände und auf dem Feld als "Privat" gekennzeichnet, so dass sie auf der Karte anders dargestellt und von der Routenplanung nicht berücksichtigt werden. 
Viele Grüße, Joachim
DD1GJ (2023-12-12 09:49:24+00:00): revert, siehe Kommentar bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144947573
tyfi (2023-12-09 21:42:10+00:00): Missing source: TIGER called it "Spur EE"
user_5359 (2023-12-11 15:47:52+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1229995396 (one of three objects). What is the mean of the tag glp = no
PedroMTG13 (2023-12-11 15:50:14+00:00): Hi, its for gas vehicles. Gpl its the portuguese equivelent
aceman444 (2025-02-19 18:18:18+00:00): Thanks for the additions, but the values should be in the local language (Slovak). Also, you do not just throw all the info into name and description, if it can be split into the proper tags like 'manufacturer', 'model', wikidata, etc.
Ropino (2024-02-16 16:51:19+00:00): Hi,
woher stammen deine Informationen zur Lage und den angebenen Werten der Straßenbahngleise in der Abstellhalle der Ruhrbahn?
Mit Sicherheit nicht aus den Luftbildern die du als Quelle angegeben hast, es sei den, du kannst durch die Dächer durchschauen.
OTG sind die Daten auch nicht erhoben wurden, sonst wären die Lage der Gleise und ein paar Werte anders...
MappSurfer (2024-02-22 21:28:39+00:00): Hallo Rapino
Die Gleise in der Halle habe ich nicht neu erstellt. Die waren so bereits vorhanden. Ich habe blos die Ecken runder gemacht. Die beiden Gleise mit Notes habe laut Chronik zwar ich erstellt, richtig ist aber, dass ich der Einfachheit halber die beiden Gleise weitergezeichnet und erst danach getrennt habe. Deshalb ist deren eigentliche Chronik nun auf den Gleisen vor der Halle.
Ich hoffe, ich konnte damit deine Frage beantworten.
P.S.: Was bedeutet OTG?

Liebe Grüsse
MappSurfer
Marek-M (2023-12-09 22:51:58+00:00): Cześć, dodawanie dużej ilości węzłów na krótkim odcinku drogi (np. tutaj: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1230000660 )jest utrudnieniem dla nawigacji (routingu) a ponadto łatwo jest wtedy popełnić błędy przy edycji drogi tworząc ostry kąt. Drogę, którą narysowałeś 9 węzłami spokojnie można zastąpić prostym kątem i użyć do tego 5 węzłów. Tak ją poprawiłem: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=144950213
b-holdet (2023-12-10 17:15:58+00:00): It is not a hotel but a retreat and a meeting room:

https://thekrane.dk/press/
"Publishing

If you publish an article about THEKRANE, we kindly ask you to refer to the project as a retreat and a meeting room. We would be pleased to receive a PDF of the article "
JuaFritz (2024-02-04 15:39:32+00:00): Ciao, ho notato che con questa modifica (e le successive) avevi mappato la statale della Valsugana come percorribile alle bici e vietata ai veicoli a motore (oltre a creare molti percorsi ciclabili tutti sovrapposti). Ho già ripristinato la percorribilità, altrimenti sarebbe un gran problema per tutte i servizi basati su OSM.
Bexhill-OSM (2026-07-20 23:08:51+00:00): Should the reference be 1066 rather than 1006?
AlwynWellington (2026-07-21 21:32:27+00:00): I agree.  Even when touch typing just now my fingers types (in error) 1006L.  I have changed to 1066L.  For my change notes I reviewed publically available material.  That review suggests  1) the path is overgrown in several places and may not be in use 2) while two signs had red on white 1066 link lables one displayed 1066 white on red signage and one said "Country Walk" 3) that there may not be any signage for the two alternatives.

I recommend that the link be walked from Jevington to Rickeny and that either all the 1066L elements be deleted or they be recoded as part of hiking route 1066.
I would be pleased to comment further on that latter proposal as required.
Bexhill-OSM (2026-07-21 22:12:25+00:00): Thank you :)
The main route and two other links (Bexhill & Hastings) were relaunched in 2021, but it seems this link to the South Downs has been omitted or mostly forgotten about. I say leave as is for now.
AlwynWellington (2026-07-21 22:48:34+00:00): No problem.  I was aware of the relaunch and also of the link being noted - leading to my suggestions.

I am always on the lookout for long distance routes that I can walk (with accomodation after a days work being within say 30 minutes or less of the route) and where a days work is (having regard to my capabilities and age) less than 20km.
Hufkratzer (2023-12-10 16:46:31+00:00): Hi,
I think the riding hall should not get the horse_riding tag because this tag is for the whole area of the rideclub, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=horse_riding#When_not_to_use
If you want to put a leisure tag on the riding hall then better use leisure=sports_hall, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building=riding_hall#Use_as_a_riding_hall This would avoid nested leisure=horse_riding tags.
GeeMaps! (2023-12-10 03:57:09+00:00): Hello talawqaaa12111. Thanks for your work but one slight issue to mention. landuse=residential is used for whole neighbourhoods / towns e.g https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8475054#map=14/32.2815/35.9007, not just individual houses. They are best just mapped as building=yes. Could you please fix the ones you've done? Thanks!
NieWnen (2023-12-10 13:22:05+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4037466
Coś nie wyszło do końca (nie patrzyłem na wszystkie).
NieWnen (2023-12-10 13:22:50+00:00): *nie ta zmiana, do tej miało być: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144950899
kubahahaha (2023-12-10 13:33:25+00:00): Aj, racja. Poprawie wieczorem, nie przyciskiem linii
kubahahaha (2023-12-10 17:34:59+00:00): Poprawione
Taya_S (2023-12-13 18:26:26+00:00): Hallo A67-A67,

Zou jij mischien even naar de recente edits voor Buslijn 8 willen kijken?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1368960
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1368961

Een andere gebruiker lijkt te hebben geprobeerd te hebben de busroute relatie te verwijderen op een nogal bijzondere manier en ik weet niet goed wat ik hier mee moet. 

Vriendelijke groeten,
Taya
A67-A67 (2023-12-14 19:59:22+00:00): Hoi, Het lijkt te kloppen dat bus 8 niet meer rijdt. Ik heb de tags van de concessie omgezet naar de nieuwe concessie, maar niet de buslijnen geüpdatet naar de nieuwe dienstregeling. Ik zal bus 8 verwijderen. De rest van de dienstregeling van Twente moet nog worden bijgewerkt.
Taya_S (2023-12-15 17:20:52+00:00): Top, bedankt!
NorthCrab_upload (2023-12-09 23:40:24+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184997588
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184990162
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184996619
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100320291
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100320272

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Dimitar155 (2023-12-16 09:21:45+00:00): Thanks for adding it! The only thing to note is that the one you added is for the town and not for the municipality. You can match them relatively safely if you check the ekatte tag.
◪ Jarv (2023-12-10 18:06:38+00:00): Hi CoastalResident.

I've reverted this changeset as it appears that you have only glued two roads together, which results in the two ways sharing the exact same nodes which isn't allowed as it causes errors.

144973287
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144951521
Rainero (2024-03-13 21:50:25+00:00): Hallo gnlpfth,

bzgl. der Erfassung der Tarifzonen: die Verwendung von "mvv:zone" als Schlüssel finde ich unpassend, weil ein Schlüssel das Merkmal, das erfasst werden soll, beschreiben sollte, so dass es für alle Verkehrsverbünde geeignet ist.

Zunächst dachte ich an "tariff_zone". Das gibt es 11 mal, nun ja. Nach weiterer Recherche bin ich auf "fare_zone" gestoßen. Das gibt es gut 5500 mal https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/fare_zone und dafür gibt es ein Proposal https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Fare_zone .

Das scheint mir gut geeignet. Es berücksichtigt auch die Möglichkeit den Verkehrsverbund (network) im Wert mit anzugeben, besonders bei Übergangsbereichen von 2 Verbünden. Fände ich generell nicht verkehrt, macht die Datenauswertung einfacher. Also z.B. fare_zone=MVV:M oder fare_zone=MVV:2;3

Was hältst du davon?

Servus,
Rainer
gnlpfth (2024-03-14 11:12:20+00:00): Hallo Rainer,

da hast du völlig recht! Ich weiß nicht warum ich nicht selbst auf das Tag gekommen bin, aber ich würde es einführen.

Aber gehört der Verkehrsverbund nicht in den Key? Also "fare_zone:MVV=2".

LG,
Chris
Rainero (2024-03-15 17:51:19+00:00): Hallo Chris,
ja, da hast du recht. Das steht eigentlich auch in dem Proposal https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Fare_zone#Property_Model

Ich habe gestern beim Münchner OSM-Treffen gefragt, um weitere Meinungen zu hören. Da gab es auch Zustimmung zu fare_zone:MVV=x. Wenn es mal später Überschneidungen mit einem anderen Verbund gibt, kann das mit z.B. fare_zone:MVV=9;10 und fare_zone:AVV=5 abgebildet werden.
Ehrlich gesagt, habe ich eine Weile gesucht, bis ich auf fare_zone gestoßen bin, weil ich immer nach irgendwas mit tarif gesucht habe.

Servus,
Rainer
nevw (2023-12-10 02:01:47+00:00): Hi, one of the East Ocean sites has been mapped onto a railway line. Can you shift it to the site it operates from.
nevw (2024-01-01 18:40:20+00:00): No response, removed restaurant from rail line. Another by same name seems mapped ok.
D Monk (2024-03-15 09:04:34+00:00): 我觉得那是租自行车店的间开启时
MxxCon (2023-12-13 03:48:28+00:00): Hello.
In this changeset you damaged the multipolygon relation for Kiely Hall (KY) building.. You deleted its inner exclusion polygon and instead just added a park polygon. Semantically you made it so that this "park" is inside of this building, which it's not..
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144952411
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2023-12-10 01:48:20+00:00): Related notes:
+ https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4019123
+ https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4019124
ooosssay (2023-12-10 04:50:42+00:00): Thank you
Frank Peng (2026-01-07 02:44:08+00:00): Please take the time to leave better changeset comments. What did you change and why? "NA" is not considered a good changeset comment.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2023-12-10 02:35:49+00:00): Source:

+ https://www.festo.com.cn/cn/zh/e/about-festo/news-center/festo-jinan-plant-relocation-id_408715/
+ https://www.festo.com.cn/cn/zh/e/contact-id_59297/
+ https://www.festo.com.cn/cn/zh/e/about-festo/news-center/festo-jinan-fully-operational-id_736711/
MxxCon (2023-12-13 04:10:03+00:00): Hello.
Generally, street-side parking should be mapped as tags on the road itself rather than a separate polygon.
You can read about the current parking tagging schema at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Street_parking
Towards the button of the page it includes links to some editing tools specifically designed for tagging parking features.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144953354
PinRPG (2023-12-10 03:13:51+00:00): See also changeset #144953350
Thierry1030 (2023-12-10 07:58:14+00:00): Hello!
Thanks for adding this dropzone.
For your info: the image link (created via StreetComplete) won't be valid anymore after some days ...
pi11 (2023-12-10 19:08:39+00:00): Hey Thierry, thank you for informing me. Because some notes are a couple of years old and still have images attached, I presumed they stayed valid. I will refrain from adding them in the future. Thank you, pi11
JassKurn (2023-12-11 00:34:03+00:00): Hi Andy R (NZ),
I've reverted this changeset. The imagery you used is outdated and the buildings you mapped are gone. You deleted the new layout and mapped the old

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144981333

There is still mapping details to be sorted out for the new buildings.

Jass
IraGersh (2023-12-10 04:48:02+00:00): in adding the alt_name I unintentionally changed the feature type to an address.  I believe it was something of more interest.  Looking at the history I could not see what it was.  I do see now there are warnings:mismatched... with a value of 1.
woodpeck (2023-12-22 09:28:13+00:00): Dear TawhidAhmad, in this changeset you have deleted the sidewalk north of Sugarloaf Parkway along the YMCA facility (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1227227158 et al.). Why? The sidewalk is still visible on aerial imagery. Your changeset comments are not helpful; everyone who edits OSM wants to enhance the data quality! What we're looking for in a changeset comment is "deleted sidewalk because it has been demolished" or something like that, so people like me don't have to ask questions like this!
osmuser63783 (2023-12-10 12:38:23+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap :-)

I noticed that you created three objects to represent Edinburgh Castle. The castle is already mapped in OSM, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4301292, therefore I am removing the objects as duplicates. Let me know if you have any questions, and happy mapping!
mueschel (2023-12-27 11:53:00+00:00): Hi,
I found the tag "nb_carton" on several recycling containers. This is not used in any other place - what does it mean?
Arnaud Champollion (2023-12-27 12:38:41+00:00): Hello,
It means that carton can be recycled. But it comes from adminsitration database and I forgot to replace 
nb_carton>0
by
recycling:carton=yes
which seems to be the Openstreetmap corresponding tag.
mueschel (2023-12-28 13:24:00+00:00): Thanks, I replaced 32 tags:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145619743
eggie (2023-12-10 07:56:58+00:00): Hi.
Again...
Please no space in a postcode. Wrong osm format.
Greetz
eggie
Supaplex (2023-12-10 08:40:37+00:00): 如果是個人行程的記錄，別上傳上來，用 Maps.me 的書籤功能即可
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144955352
felipeeugenio (2023-12-10 14:46:08+00:00): Hola.
Footway (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dfootway) y path (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpath) son conceptos muy distintos. Por favor no cambiar estos a path. Cualquien consulta por favor entrar al chat de la comunidad en Telegram en el link en la descripción de mi perfil.
gracias
Daemon Targaryen (2023-12-11 01:17:37+00:00): Hola, lo había cambiado a "path" porque en la explicación que aparece al editar dice que este es un camino para peatones y vehículos no motorizados (como bicicletas) y "footway" caminos a pie principal o exclusivamente para peatones. 
Pero bueno no importa, si agrego algún otro sendero urbano lo pondré como "footway". 
¡Saludos!
felipeeugenio (2023-12-11 11:36:17+00:00): Hola
A un footway se le puede agregar bicycle=yes. Saludos
arjunaraoc (2023-12-17 02:50:13+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145202847
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144955402
Kovoschiz (2023-12-10 19:39:58+00:00): Please don't delete casually. You broke a `enforcement=traffic_signals` here.
JeffH (2023-12-22 08:26:53+00:00): Hi, I've been in the area several times and seem to have driven though the SE part of Selati Game Reserve without noticing:) I really doubt that it spans the main road R40. Where do you have your data from? The map I've found at africageographic.com seems to indicate that the game reserve is all to the NW of R40 with an entrance from R40 at the reserve's SE corner.
KwaXoloXolo (2023-12-22 12:38:24+00:00): Hi Jeff, I use 2 sources - the national dept's map of protected areas and the surveyor- general's 1:50000 maps.  Both are far from perfect. Also there are some areas that are legally protected but look nothing like a conventional game reserve.  I will take another look at Selati. If you know the area well then I have no problem if you adjust the boundaries.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-12-10 10:01:33+00:00): Thanks for processing https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3837986 !

I lack both local knowledge and local language, so was only able to spot problem.

BTW https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Mateusz_Konieczny/unusual_shop_values/Germany has listing of similar cases and may or may not be useful (repeated ones near top, single use values at bottom)
eggie (2023-12-10 09:53:25+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
tastrax (2023-12-10 11:32:15+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
Azharul Islam Anik (2024-02-08 08:13:43+00:00): A building was crossing the highway. It's fixed. Thanks for the contribution.
Azharul Islam Anik (2024-02-21 16:11:44+00:00): Way: 1230051277. A building crossing the road has been fixed.
Lelio Alves (2024-02-27 12:45:00+00:00): Thank you
flohoff (2023-12-10 11:52:59+00:00): Moin,
ist die Quadbahn wirklich entfernt oder einfach nur wegen Geschäftsaufgabe ist da nichts mehr offen. Dann wäre ja ein lifecycle tag mit "disused:" besser als das zu löschen oder?

Flo
voland87 (2023-12-10 13:56:12+00:00): Hallo,
die Quadbahn - also die alten Autoreifen, die die Bahn begrenzt haben, sind auch weg. Also ja, die Bahn ist komplett entfernt worden.
Cheers
R.
philippec (2023-12-10 21:24:25+00:00): Heel goed,
is het toestel zichtbaar van buiten ?
Ik gebruik access anders.
mcliquid (2023-12-10 09:04:40+00:00): Hi, why did you move the housenumber 1 to the 4? The position was correct before.
Schenkelhals0815 (2023-12-10 09:26:44+00:00): Hi!
Where should I have moved the housenumber? I only worked at "Kindergarten Brantmann" and at paramedic station.
Schenkelhals0815 (2023-12-10 09:40:47+00:00): Got it - my bad
CurlingMan13 (2023-12-10 09:20:07+00:00): What source did you use to change the name of the street?  "Memes Street" sounds mighty sus.
blacx (2023-12-10 09:29:18+00:00): https://twitter.com/BocaChicaGal/status/1732464106035192206
Branko Kokanovic (2023-12-19 14:36:55+00:00): Po RGZ registru, ovde je broj "Ornice 97". Vidim da ste promenili na "Kralja Aleksandra". Da li ste sigurno da ovo nije ulica "Ornice"?
ohmanger (2023-12-21 15:50:09+00:00): Hi willisturm - this stop is explicitly signposted as coach only. Coaches are usually considered a different form of transport in the UK (although I apricate it is quite arbitrary). In this case the stop is only used by tour groups. Is there a way of tagging this?

Going by https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tourist_bus (also key:coach) I suggest the following might be agreeable:

bus=no
tourist_bus=designated
highway=bus_stop

Or is the note tag sufficient?

I apricate you're just trying to keep the data clean. Thanks
arjunaraoc (2023-12-17 02:46:17+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Internal roads may be tagged as service and  need to be connected to external road.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144957710
Hufkratzer (2023-12-10 17:54:17+00:00): Hi,
Not so bad, Some things you could improve:
- Outdoor arenas are usually tagged leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian (iD preset "Horseback Riding / Rodeo Arena")
- Indoor arenas can be tagged building=riding_hall (there is no iD preset yet, will be in next release)
- Horse exercisers can be tagged animal=horse_walker (there is no iD preset yet)

Compare
Wiki:
- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building=riding_hall
- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:animal=horse_walker
Examples:
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1008067851
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1230004271
Skids (2023-12-10 19:33:49+00:00): Hi, thanks for your comments, I have just made the changes that you suggest.
Hufkratzer (2023-12-10 19:55:27+00:00): You're right, a riding arena is not a pitch, but in the early days of OSM someone started tagging them that way, it spread and after a while so many were tagged that way that it can't be changed any more.  Have a look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=pitch#Examples !
Skids (2023-12-11 06:25:05+00:00): Thanks again, so it seems that in OSM terms all sports are played on a pitch.  I really enjoyed the single basket ball hoop in a house garden being tagged as a pitch.  Talk about the road to madness.....
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-12-10 18:41:38+00:00): I think it's better to use multipolygon relation as it's better supported