piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Jarek 🚲 (2024-05-17 15:13:23+00:00): the species tags for the Roncesvalles surveys are verbatim from plaques in front of the trees
NeisBot (2024-05-17 14:55:05+00:00): Hi chrisr3, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1284144583

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
bxl-forever (2024-05-17 16:44:45+00:00): Hello,

Housenumber 1 already exists on the map in another building… and FenekO seems to be already mapped there.

Why do you need to duplicate this?  Are they operating two buildings now?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/205744705
Jean-Louis Stanus (2024-05-17 17:10:19+00:00): This commit is based on survey (public tax surveyor) and mapillary. Please look at building unit tag. It s a second building of feneko.
miluethi (2024-05-17 22:26:22+00:00): Gary,

I have a few requests for your OSM contributions:
1) please square out your building shape by pressing the "Q" key with a selected building shape.
2) narrow down your building sizes to the sat imagery without any  shadows around them.
3) Try to keep your changesets in a smaller area if you don't edit large feature (a road for example).

Thank you for contributing to OSM Nicaragua.
map per (2024-05-19 16:48:41+00:00): Wegen review_requested:
Die Änderung sieht gut aus, jetzt ist der Laden an der neuen Adresse.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-05-17 15:20:18+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11913577495

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
EneaSuper (2024-05-18 08:47:42+00:00): Ciao granpasso, attento, in basso a sinistra del changeset ti è scappato via un nodo 😊

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=151459631
granpasso811 (2024-05-20 06:49:53+00:00): Ciao, ooops! Grazie della segnalazione, ho corretto l'errore. Buona giornata.
dcapillae (2024-05-17 15:22:49+00:00): P. D.: Será bidireccional al menos hasta el 2 de junio (corrijo errata).
Aleksandar Matejevic (2024-10-24 08:38:30+00:00): Hi aq123, 
Can you confirm that this pool name=Fitness is correct, it looks like descriptive one
aq123 (2024-10-24 16:33:55+00:00): Hi Aleksandar!
I've checked the photos - you're right, it was just one of few English words on their big sign. And since there is no real name on it, I've deleted the name tag.
Aleksandar Matejevic (2024-10-24 17:17:13+00:00): Thanks for a very fast reply. Happy mapping
alrekur (2026-01-31 19:55:30+00:00): You had the accidentally set the whole stream segment between the reservoir and Allen Brook as a culvert. I fixed it so only the section under the road is a culvert.
Jarek 🚲 (2024-05-17 15:39:35+00:00): Sorry I see that it was from OsmAnd user, but same thing basically.
literan (2024-05-17 17:33:09+00:00): не надо рисовать здания поверх дорог
VictorIE (2024-05-31 21:48:26+00:00): Hi

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11913624079

FedEx Ship Centers are like retail post offices that one would have in a neighbourhood. Is actually a delivery office? amenity=post_depot NOT amenity=post_office
Oxeelix (2025-06-24 20:26:42+00:00): Think I chose the wrong preset here at the time, I've changed it to a post_depot now
Константин Гам (2024-08-22 08:10:44+00:00): Проверили лично и нашли знак "Движение на велосипеде запрещено"? Не надо вносить то, чего не существует.
Был мост, его видимо окончательно смыло, но вносить глупости в карту не строит. За брод - спасибо.
Hufkratzer (2024-05-17 21:17:42+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1284161779 should better be tagged leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian (like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/951941091) because it is a riding arena and not a riding centre. The riding centre was already mapped as node: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11370936481. Compare https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dhorse_riding
MxxCon (2024-05-20 05:27:40+00:00): Hello.
I believe this change is incorrect. Here bike path and pedestrian path are mapped as 2 separate ways.
As such, tag segregated=yes would imply that on this bike path pedestrians have a segregated "lane", but that's not the case. There's no 'segregation' on the "bike" path because all the pedestrian info is tagged as a separate way.
I hope my explanation makes sense..
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151461637
VLD062 (2024-05-20 15:56:06+00:00): Hi MxxCon, thank you for your feedback and suggesting the fix! I re-read the wiki regarding the segregated tag and I think you are 100% correct. The segregated=yes tag would apply if the footway and cycleway were captured in one way feature. However, in this case, they are separately digitized, so segregated=no would be more appropriate. Please let me know if I'm understanding it correctly. I have made the changes to the tag as well. Thank you!
dgitto (2024-05-26 08:43:58+00:00): benvenuto in OSM
eggie (2024-05-17 17:07:55+00:00): Hi. Hint..
Split tunnel.. outside the building is no building_passage.
Connect the endnodes with the building_shape.
Gr eggie
Sansan H (2024-05-17 20:04:20+00:00): Btw The outlines of the buildings have changed too, but I'm not going to change this (for now). I'm not sure how it should look like. Will there be new photo's at some point to make it fit again?
eggie (2024-05-17 20:13:01+00:00): Hi   This is the last data from the Dutch Registry https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/?searchQuery=Grote+Overstraat+19&objectId=0150010000052009&theme=BRT+Achtergrond&geometry.x=207631.1795&geometry.y=474177.6535&zoomlevel=15

If it's not correct please report this to the BAG. See link.
All buildings are import and updated from time to time.
Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2024-05-17 20:41:23+00:00): Last sat picture from this year incl. 
plane :)

https://www.satellietdataportaal.nl/?base=openstreetmap&res=0.3%2C0.5&datemin=17-05-2023&loc=52.25312%2C6.158947%2C18z&overlay=mos-0&marker=loc&acqdate=2024-03-10&acqid=20240310_111913_SVNEO-02&sensor=SuperView-NEO
Sansan H (2024-05-17 20:47:41+00:00): Done. Bedankt voor de info.
jb54osm (2024-05-17 18:51:01+00:00): Hi,

I think it is rather useless to remove these walls. (There are lots of them in this area.) The walls are imported from the national registry. During the next update of OSM they will return.
eggie (2024-05-17 17:10:34+00:00): Hi..

You may add more additional info.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:guest_house%3Dbed_and_breakfast

Gr eggie
NeisBot (2024-05-17 16:35:04+00:00): Hi Uihgt, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/node/11913631850

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-21 17:09:45+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/151522913
NeisBot (2024-05-17 16:35:04+00:00): Hi Uihgt, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/node/11913710558

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
WoodWoseWulf (2024-05-19 08:15:25+00:00): Hello Uihgt,

Please do not add fictional features to the map.

Your changes have been reverted.
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-21 17:15:15+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/151522913
Vas111 (2024-08-01 14:48:59+00:00): Hello there,
I noticed you have been mapping linear footways as pedestrian areas en masse. If you want to add the area of a footway you should tag it as area:highway=footway, as area=yes + highway=pedestrian is reserved for pedestrian areas such as squares or plazas. Not only is it incorrect mapping, it also poses problems for routers as they usually plan a route around the edge of the area instead of through the middle as with a simple linear way.
OnwardTravel (2024-08-03 09:26:51+00:00): Okay, I will change to tagging as footway.
Cucazer (2024-05-20 16:24:17+00:00): Hello!
This changeset created a bunch of multipolygons (e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17605455, https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17605456) for the objects that were already marked as simple polygons. These didn't have any unusual geometries (as in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon#Examples_in_XML) to justify use of multipolygons. In this scenario converting simple ways to relations with many members just complicates further editing, as the features cannot be that easily separated.
What are your intentions with converting simple polygons to multipolygons?
CurlingMan13 (2024-05-18 00:45:08+00:00): If the path is a bridge over water, please add the appropriate bridge tags.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151463711
Chris Denomy (2024-05-18 03:48:07+00:00): ok will do.
Henry572 (2024-05-17 16:50:35+00:00): Wohl eher D-Bilk
Silur (2024-05-20 20:05:43+00:00): Danke für das motorroad=no, das war mir entgangen.
Ich halte allerdings trunk für eine unglückliche Wahl hier, da die Idee der Umleitungsstrecke ja ganz offensichtlich ist, den Olaf-Palme-Damm als normale Straße zu verwenden. Dass der Ausbauzustand dabei nicht mitentfernt wird liegt ja mehr in der statischen Natur von solchen Bauwerken...  Ich glaube auch, das motorroad alleine niemandem hilft. Kein Motorrollerfahrer fährt auf eine Straße, die als Trunk eingezeichnet war. Und genauso wird sicherlich kein Routingalgorithmus einen Motorroller auf so eine Straße schicken, die Algorithmen stützen sich ja aus gutem Grund selten auf ein Tag alleine... 
Da mag man jetzt Tagging für den Renderer einwenden - aber da ich keine Spezialrenderer für so eine seltene Art Umleitung erwarte, würde ich es eher Tagging für die Nutzer nennen wollen.
Pilgerobst (2024-05-22 15:31:00+00:00): Ich bedanke mich für die Kritik. Normalerweise ist es üblich, kreuzungsfreue, anbaufreie Straßen mit highway=trunk zu taggen, insbesondere bei 2 Richtungsfahrbahnhn ohne überholmöglichkeit. Aufgrund der Besonderen Lage der Brücke als einzige Möglichkeit an dieser Stelle den NOK zu überqueren bin ich damit einverstanden, den highway=primary tag zu verwenden. Falls der Rad- und Fußweg wiedereröffnet wird und sich herausstellt, dass auch Mofas zugelassen sind, dann würde ich persönlich wieder highway=trunk benutzen, jedoch würde ich das dann nicht mehr anfassen.
TLDR: Für diesen Moment highway=trunk ok
Pilgerobst (2024-05-22 15:31:27+00:00): *highway=primary (TLDR)
Silur (2024-05-30 19:26:57+00:00): Danke für die Bereitschaft, sich mit meiner Sichtweise auseinanderzusetzen! Ich werde das jetzt eher nicht noch einmal umtaggen, zumal die Fußgänger-/Radfahrersperrung  nur für einen vergleichsweise kurzen Zeitraum sein soll.
Vielleicht braucht es für zukünftig einfach eine schlaue Idee, was man als Rendering für motorroad yes/no vorschlagen kann...
George Sears (2024-05-17 18:00:23+00:00): Salve e benvenuto su OpenStreetMap, ma la modifica che ha effettuato qui è errata, come può leggere sulla wiki qui https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:boundary , i confini comunali sono classificati con admin_level 8, inoltre vedo che ha per sbaglio trascinato un nodo di una strada creandone un errore nel percorso. 
Se vuole provvedo io a correggere. 
La invito a entrare a far parte della community italiana presente su telegram così, se dovesse avere qualunque domanda o dubbio può ricevere aiuto da noi. 
Ecco il link del gruppo (da qui si accede al gruppo vero e proprio) 
https://t.me/OpenStreetMapItalia
Frans S (2024-05-18 08:28:59+00:00): Hello. This is why I ask you not to mark a task as ready for validating as a new mapper.
Please look to this webpage where the modifications are made after your mapping.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=151482048
Read the Legend for more info.
Best regards
NeisBot (2024-05-17 17:25:05+00:00): Hi AGEN143, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1284181407

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
AGEN143 (2024-05-18 01:35:09+00:00): Hi,
The source is from Bing Maps Aerial.
Regards.
watmildon (2026-02-26 05:45:45+00:00): Nice mapping! You may find it interesting to know that this weird feature is a type of air beacon called an VORTAC. Super neat thing.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/427479737/history#map=19/-7.969863/-14.397361

https://maproulette.org/browse/challenges/54174
fabian_i (2024-05-20 10:37:04+00:00): Das sieht OK aus. Du könntest noch das Stück dazwischen korrigieren.
fabian_i (2024-05-20 10:36:22+00:00): Das sieht OK aus. Du könntest noch das Stück dazwischen korrigieren.
citrula (2024-05-18 09:00:38+00:00): Is the housenumber really "SG59"? That is really uncommon in the US, maybe it's the unit instead? Also, I don't see a street named "Lake Cherokee" nearby.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151465219
TStout (2024-05-20 17:10:39+00:00): Yes, this is a private lake, and everyone uses the Lot # as the address.  Our 911 address is "SG59 Lake Cherokee,  Henderson, TX  75652
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151465219
TStout (2024-05-20 17:10:41+00:00): Yes, this is a private lake, and everyone uses the Lot # as the address.  Our 911 address is "SG59 Lake Cherokee,  Henderson, TX  75652
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151465219
TStout (2024-05-20 17:11:01+00:00): I agree it is weird, but that is how the lake does it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151465219
TStout (2024-05-20 17:11:03+00:00): I agree it is weird, but that is how the lake does it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151465219
NeisBot (2024-05-17 17:45:06+00:00): Hi AGEN143, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1284189638

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
AGEN143 (2024-05-18 01:31:24+00:00): Hi,
The source is from Bing Maps Aerial.
It looks like a sand banks.
Regards.
WoodWoseWulf (2024-05-21 05:57:28+00:00): Hi AGEN143,
natural=shoal may be a better tag for this feature.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dshoal
AGEN143 (2024-05-21 10:19:51+00:00): Hi WoodWoseWulf,
Yes you are right.
Regards.
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-21 17:14:46+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/151620752

The user corrected her/his own beach.
mfdz (2025-06-07 12:45:29+00:00): Hi @Niiepce, is this parking private? If so, it should rather be park_ride=no, shouldn't it?
Niiepce (2025-07-16 12:21:08+00:00): Ja park_ride=yes ist hier falsch. Anscheinend gibt es hier in Heidelberg einige falsch getaggte Parkplätze, was das angeht: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/27Xe
Ich habe diesen und einige weitere mal korrigiert. Danke für den Hinweis
Frans S (2024-08-04 13:15:40+00:00): Hello. A bit late, (validating backlog)
I reviewed your mappings. Your mappings are accurate, but often not squared by after selecting it push on the Q button.
Best regard and hope to see you soon mapping again.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-05-17 18:20:31+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3686350101
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/841614577

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
literan (2024-05-18 10:03:41+00:00): plague это чума :)
не в порядке упрека, просто забавно
sirorezka (2024-05-21 13:34:24+00:00): да, смешно вышло )))
silversurfer83 (2024-05-17 21:07:51+00:00): Gude :)

das sieht ja spannend aus und könnte was für ne Tour mit den Kids sein.

Zu den neuen nodes:
- Bei Infotafeln haben wir das Feld "board:title=" welches wir anstatt "name=*" für die "Überschrift" der Tafel nutzen können (was ich persönlich bevorzuge, seit ich den Schlüssel kenne, aber niemandem vorschreiben möchte)

- an einigen Punkten hast du board und andere Dinge (Spielplatzgeräte, Bänke) zusammen getaggt. Würde mich interessieren, wie das vor Ort aussieht, da wir eigentlich für jedes dieser Objekte einen eigenen node erfassen um die Daten ordentlich getrennt erfassen zu können. Da müsstest du nochmal drauf gucken.

Ansonsten ist das schonmal ein guter Start um den Rundwanderweg zu erfassen, wenn er fertig ist.

cheers
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151466932
midget sub (2024-05-18 21:24:22+00:00): Hello, Westover ARB is *not* open to the public and all these ways you have added need to be marked as such. Further, these are foot paths, since they are not open to bicycle, horse, or moped use. I have asked you multiple times now to kindly use appropriate access tags while mapping from aerial data, and/or to defer to those of us with direct knowledge of on-the-ground access conditions. Thanks again for your attention.
Famlam (2024-05-18 13:31:08+00:00): Hi Doormat0,

Something seems to be wrong here:
The name is "Tools 4"
But the Dutch and English names ("name:nl" and "name:en") are  "Tools 4 Tones"

I suspect the shop is simply called "Tools 4 Tones" in every language? (In that case, adjust the name tag and remove the unnecessary name:*-tags)
midget sub (2024-05-18 21:26:26+00:00): Hello, Westover ARB is *not* open to the public and all these ways you have added need to be marked as such. Further, these are foot paths, since they are not open to bicycle, horse, or moped use. I have asked you multiple times now to kindly use appropriate access tags while mapping from aerial data, and/or to defer to those of us with direct knowledge of on-the-ground access conditions. Thanks again for your attention.
Intrinsical (2024-05-17 18:56:13+00:00): also improved the groundcover and cliffs
Intrinsical (2024-06-02 21:16:14+00:00): I should have been more clear in the changeset comment, and specified that I left them untagged on purpose, until I could get more confirmation that they really existed.
Patchanka (2025-09-07 08:50:05+00:00): bonjour
est-ce que ce terrain est vraiment en construction ?
Vous l'avez ajouté en 2024 mais on voit sur l'ortho express 2025 qu'il est toujours tel qu'en 2022.
Ne serait-ce pas plutôt une friche où des travaux sont envisagés/prévus mais pas encore commencés ?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:landuse%3Dbrownfield
NeisBot (2024-05-17 19:10:07+00:00): Hi Fred36, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1284212831

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
WoodWoseWulf (2024-05-18 21:12:38+00:00): Hi Fred36. There is no beach as this location, and as such this feature has now been removed.
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-21 17:13:28+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/151512168
rskedgell (2024-05-21 09:37:18+00:00): You appear to have tagged the sections of Melton Road approaching the roundabout from the NE as foot=no in response to a StreetComplete task asking "Are pedestrians forbidden to walk on this road here?"

I have checked the available Bing Streetside and/or Mapillary imagery for evidence that there really is a (signed) pedestrian prohibition here. I cannot see any TSRGD diagram 625.1 "pedestrians prohibited" signs on the imagery, so do not believe that a prohibition exists and have therefore reverted your edit.

The wiki states that access tags reflect legal access. Subjective opinions about whether it would be pleasant, a good idea, safe, etc. for a particular transport mode are not relevant to legal access.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:foot

As real pedestrian prohibitions on public roads other than those tagged as highway=motorway or motorroad=yes in the UK are quite rare and are always signed, this quest is probably better left disabled.
eggie (2024-05-17 19:58:54+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
marc__marc (2024-09-18 00:15:35+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/32521173
cycleway=opposite est l'ancienne façon pour dire que la rue n'est pas sens unique pour les vélos. mais en même temps il y a un tag qui dit explicitement qu'elle est sens unique aussi pour les vélos, qu'en est-il ?
Cordialement,
Marc
MxxCon (2024-05-20 05:32:07+00:00): Hello.
Rather than completely deleting a closed biz, it's much better to use lifecycle prefixes as documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix Doing it that way preserves history of this object, which can be useful to refer to in the future.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151469113
dannmer (2024-05-20 07:39:13+00:00): The business closed many years ago and therefore doesn’t seem to meet the criteria for using a lifestyle prefix described in the documentation.
eggie (2024-05-17 20:03:40+00:00): Dag Makkey  

Welk bord staat hier vooraan.
Het is nu bebord met C1 Wit bord Rode rand. 
muv fietsers en delivery.
Graag reactie,

We taggen alleen een fietspad als er een bord fietspad staat. Het is nu inconsistent getagd.

MVG
eggie