piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2026-05-12 18:45:20+00:00): Oke, maar Eigen Weg wil niet zeggen Verboden Toegang. Dat zit juridisch anders in elkaar.
Bij een Eigen Weg taggen we dan access=permissive De eigenaar kan te allen tijde iemand de toegang ontzeggen.
Toegankelijkheid: Een eigen weg is vaak "ter bede" toegankelijk, wat betekent dat de eigenaar toestemming geeft voor gebruik, maar dit ook op elk moment kan intrekken.

Wanneer hij aangeeft op blijkbare wijze dat het Verboden Toegang is dan zal er er bv een hek moeten staan en/of een bordje art 461 wvs.
Alle paden bv van Rijkswaterstaat bv langs de Westerschelde zijn EigenWeg. (Middels bord aangegeven) Daar lopen gewoon fietspaden en die zijn dus toegankelijk.
Ga dus na of er ook een bord art 461 staat.
Niet alle wegen (Eigen Weg)  zijn of kunnen onttrokken worden aan de openbaarheid. 
MVG
eggie
rikvanoostende (2026-05-12 19:08:26+00:00): Dat is correct. Als juridisch adviseur voor RWS én mede-eigenaar van deze weg weet ik er het een en ander vanaf ;)

Dat de weg aan het openbaar wegennet is onttrokken is, kan ik o.a. aantonen met een verklaring van mevrouw Kempen, strategisch juridisch adviseur van de gemeente Borsele, d.d. 29-07-2022:

"U heeft op 27 juli 2022 de gemeente verzocht om informatie. U wil weten of de weg die de Hooglandsedijk met de Vissersdijk verbindt, zoals door u zelf verduidelijkt middels de foto die u bijvoegde in uw e-mail, onderdeel uitmaakt van het openbaar wegennet zoals bedoeld in art. 4 van de Wegenwet. Dat is niet het geval. De weg is niet openbaar. "

Als antwoord op je vraag welk bord er vooraan staat, kan ik slechts aangeven dat er een bord 'EIGEN WEG' staat en momenteel geen ander bord aanwezig is.
eggie (2026-05-12 19:14:01+00:00): Oke.. dan kun je er beter access=permissive van maken .
Door de lagere klasse track zal het hoekje in de routering ook niet afgesneden meer worden na update van de routers.
Gr eggie
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-05-20 01:26:35+00:00): Reverted due to nonsensical SEO spam tags added to a random highway node

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182903829
NorthCrab_upload (2026-05-12 17:51:29+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13821838816

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
rempshaener (2026-05-13 21:25:35+00:00): Hallo
eine Anmerkung zu deinen Bearbeitungen:
Hydranten sollten nicht mit Straßen, Gebäuden u. ä. verbunden werden. Das lässt sich leicht beheben: im Editor markieren und „E“ drücken – das löst den Hydranten von der Linie.
Vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag und weiterhin viel Spaß beim Mappen.
Viele Grüße
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-12 18:38:43+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
is the following name real?
Rua Soares de Avellar,494 (117976439), v4
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-12 18:36:22+00:00): Hi Voyage Travels Bhubaneswar Taxi and Cab Services in Bhubaneswar Odisha Travel Agency Tour Operator, welcome to OSM.

I guess something went wrong were, please see https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=182567775

Best regards.
CAM-Gerlach (2026-05-20 01:24:52+00:00): (Its another SEO spammer, BTW)
mueschel (2026-05-14 17:28:32+00:00): Hi,
could you explain this edit? I wonder why I might need a freezer on the toilet.
Martinligabue (2026-05-15 10:48:55+00:00): I wondered about that too, but the freezer exists on the ground, so I mapped it as accurately as I could, I couldn't add a source in the scee changeset, but it would be "Survey". I couldn’t find an existing tag that described it better, so I used a new one following established OSM naming conventions
eggie (2026-05-12 18:22:57+00:00): Hoi,

De info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode.
Gr eggie
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-01 01:21:32+00:00): Removed SEO spam description=* and moved social media tagging to standard contact:* in changeset 183473256

https://osm.org/changeset/183473256
gscscnd (2026-05-13 14:29:00+00:00): Warto dodać construction=minor.
Marek-M (2026-05-14 10:58:21+00:00): Cześć, zamiast poprawić to popsułeś te wejścia. tag `door` powinien być uzupełnieniem tagu `entrance` a nie go zastępować. Poprawiłem Twoją zmianę w CS https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182642276
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-12 18:40:27+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
is the following name real?
Powesr (18589648), v5
Collin Cecil (2026-05-12 18:48:18+00:00): Thanks, it was a typo. It has been corrected.
SomeoneElse (2026-05-13 21:06:04+00:00): Hello,
I think that you might have forgotten to check route connectivity again. :)
If you look at https://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeMap?relationId=68378 you can see at least one more gap than there was a few days ago.
Also https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1512359940/history seems to be missing "sidewalk=separate" tags.
It's easy to tell when you've edited a relation - just look at your changset (like " 56 (68378), v145 " below).
Best Regards,
Andy
eggie (2026-05-12 18:50:15+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
arjunaraoc (2026-05-19 00:11:37+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182569492
eggie (2026-05-12 18:56:14+00:00): Dag Tim,

Op een aantal plaatsen landuse-overlap hersteld.

MVG
eggie
gormo (2026-05-13 21:40:24+00:00): Hi, die beiden Enden des Fußwegs sind nicht mit den jeweiligen Straßen (Lesteweg und Elisabeth-Flören-Winkel) verbunden, so dass ein Router nicht über den Weg routen kann.
gormo (2026-05-13 21:41:33+00:00): (und herzlich Wilkommen bei OSM! Ich hoffe, du hast viel Spaß und erfasst deine Umgebung, lernst dabei viele neue Orte kennen und hast tolle Begegnungen!)
eggie (2026-05-12 19:22:28+00:00): 👍
literan (2026-05-13 19:26:43+00:00): что это за название улицы? исправьте
Ozon_OSM11 (2026-05-14 11:36:20+00:00): Добрый день, спасибо. Исправлено.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-05-12 19:33:21+00:00): wycofanie https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182374642
rajdhani (2026-05-13 11:14:32+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:182595536
Jakka (2026-05-13 07:16:23+00:00): Je plaatst de node AED binnen omtrek gebouw en codering indoor=no ?
Jrachi (2026-05-13 06:58:53+00:00): Ciao. hai fatto un sacco di cancellazioni senza scrivere nulla nel commento.
Potresti dire qualcosa?
NorthCrab_upload (2026-05-12 20:11:04+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13822255018

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Endres Pelka (2026-06-07 14:40:50+00:00): Gibt es wirklich noch einen in den Hecken hinter dem Feuerwehrgebäude?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13822317102
eggie (2026-05-12 20:28:03+00:00): Dag Niels,

Pas svp op dat je geen paden aan de landuse vastplakt 
Je paden staan ook onder stroom van zo'n 110000 Volt. Ze zijn verbonden met een ondergrondse hoogspanningskable.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-05-12 20:32:00+00:00): Paden losgemaakt van stroomkabel en grens.
Let op.. Google svp niet gebruiken en of noemen als bron.
Dat is niet toegestaan.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-05-12 20:35:15+00:00): De  brug heb ik verwijderd en de weg losgemaakt van de duiker.
eggie (2026-05-12 20:35:33+00:00): Je edit https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=182572846
literan (2026-05-13 19:25:46+00:00): на сайте нет никакого "ТЦ" https://tsvetnoy.com/
zuicz (2026-05-14 20:43:25+00:00): Zasugeruję Waszej Cesarskiej i Apostolskiej Królewskiej Wysokości aby do tego typu parkingów https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1512717137 dodawać także tag parking=street_side

No i warto dodać, że Tarnów wygląda teraz arcyświetnie
Franciszek Józef (2026-05-15 16:03:39+00:00): Jaśnie Oświecony Książe Zuiczu,
faktycznie, zapomniałem że jest ta możliwość oznaczenia parkingu. Za chwilę biorę się do dalszej pracy w tym terenie, tak więc od razu te kilka parkingów poprawię. 
Dzięki za uwagę i za pochwałę - staram się starać :D
Wally_PL (2026-05-13 20:03:48+00:00): Jakie jest źródło tej nazwy?
user_5359 (2026-05-13 09:37:14+00:00): Welcome to OSM! What is the mean of the tags
Cota Z = - 10 = NSPT = "-" (Areia marrom claro e de consistência compacta a muito compacta)
Cota Z = - 11 = NSPT = "-" (Areia marrom claro e de consistência compacta a muito compacta)
Cota Z = - 12 = NSPT = "-" (Areia marrom claro e de consistência compacta a muito compacta)
Cota Z = - 2 = NSPT = 19 (areia marrom escuro e de consistência medianamete compacta)
Cota Z = - 6 = NSPT = 36 (Areia marrom claro e de consistência compacta a muito compacta)
Cota Z = - 7 = NSPT = 38 (Areia marrom claro e de consistência compacta a muito compacta)
Cota Z = - 8 = NSPT = 38 (Areia marrom claro e de consistência compacta a muito compacta)
Cota Z = - 9 = NSPT = 35 (Areia marrom claro e de consistência compacta a muito compacta)
Cota Z = -3 = NSPT = 31 (Areia marrom claro e de consistência compacta a muito compacta)
Cota Z = -4 = NSPT = 33 (Areia marrom claro e de consistência compacta a muito compacta)
Cota Z = -5 = NSPT = 35 (Areia marrom claro e de consistência compacta a muito compacta)
Cota Z= - 1 = NSPT = 10 (areia marrom escuro e de consistência medianamete compacta)
?
Also the value SPT is more a short_name value as name value
Marek-M (2026-05-14 11:04:53+00:00): `addr:housenumber` powinien zawierać tylko adres budynku. Jeżeli chcesz dodać numer lokalu/mieszkania należy zastosować dodatkowy tag `addr:door`.

Poprawiłem ten adres tutaj: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182642664
osmviborg (2026-05-12 21:42:54+00:00): Du kortlægger efter de gamle ortofoto. Der er kommet 2026 luftbilleder https://dataforsyningen.dk/data/2776
osmviborg (2026-05-12 21:46:16+00:00): https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/quick-luftfoto-2023-nogle-omrader-i-danmark-er-klar/98511/24
MagnumDaGreat (2026-05-12 22:03:58+00:00): Ahh... tak for at gøre mig opmærksom på dette.
Glassman (2026-05-14 02:25:28+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182575021
Glassman (2026-05-14 02:38:00+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182575030
TheSwavu (2026-05-13 00:35:05+00:00): Hi,

This shop is in the ACT, so I doubt that the phone number has an area code of 03.

I have fixed this one.

Thanks.
TheSwavu (2026-05-13 00:37:28+00:00): Ah Snap.

Sorry, I have put this comment on the wrong changeset.

Sorry about the confusion.
pwbriggs (2026-05-14 18:39:16+00:00): Thanks, looks good. Most (though not all) buildings are made up of right angles, so most editors have an option to square up the corners to be perfect angles. In the default editor, you can select an object and press Q on the keyboard (or right-click and find the "square" option) to do this.

I adjusted the outline of this building a little bit. Thanks!
Glassman (2026-05-14 02:38:32+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182575225
Glassman (2026-05-14 02:39:33+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182575338
Glassman (2026-05-14 02:38:38+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182575412
Glassman (2026-05-14 02:59:22+00:00): This looks like a full roundabout. I went ahead and modified it, but still have more work to do on the route relations.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182575484
Glassman (2026-05-14 02:37:10+00:00): I think you may have broken the school landuse multipolygon. I replaced it with just a single polygon. This also was impacted by your subsequent edit.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182575507
Glassman (2026-05-14 03:00:25+00:00): #TIP: street names are spelled out in OSM because software has a hard time with abbreviated words.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182575607
aighes (2026-05-12 22:42:40+00:00): Hey VLD319,
before you add crossings, especially on driveways, please make sure those actually qualify as crossing. For example at node 6735527900 were you just added a crossing the sidewalk just continues like on a normal driveway.
VLD319 (2026-05-19 16:33:02+00:00): Hello aighes, 

For the reason you mentioned above, our team does not add crossings to any residential driveways. However, it is our standard to add crossings for service ways like these that provide access to businesses/other amenities. While some may still be considered very minor crossings, they generally experience more vehicular traffic than normal driveways, so it is preferred to have the crossing there for safety.

Thanks, 
VLD319
aighes (2026-05-20 01:32:04+00:00): So you have been at the mentioned location and noticed significant traffic? 

To be honest, I highly doubt that, as your profile mentioned you are from Colorado, but somehow you seems to know better about the traffic than a local. Can you share your sources which make you think that "crossing" has significant amount of traffic?
VLD319 (2026-05-20 18:13:57+00:00): Thank you for bringing this specific location to my attention. I apologize if my previous comment was unclear; I was speaking more generally about our approach to this type of service road crossing, rather than this exact location.

Regarding the specific crossing you highlighted, the decision to add tags was based on visual evidence suggesting regular use such as multiple vehicles visible at the back of the building in aerial imagery (See 2020, 2023, and 2025 Oakland County Orthoimagery) as well as a sign visible in Mapillary ground imagery (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1382405392134567&focus=photo) to direct the larger trucks using this service way to the south entrance. Since these indicators suggest regular traffic flow on the service way, we felt the tags were appropriate.

However, we greatly value your on-the-ground perspective and are happy to defer to your judgment as a local concerning this location.

Best, 
VLD319
TomatoCat (2026-05-12 22:10:29+00:00): I submitted with the wrong submission note. This updates and adds to a gas station and its retail area
pwbriggs (2026-05-14 18:04:03+00:00): Thanks. I'd note that, in addition to the name of the business, you should also add what kind of business this is. In the default editor, you can do this by clicking the "building" feature type at the tob of the edit sidebar, and then searching "yoga studio" or whatever the business in question is. I updated this one to a yoga studio based on the name you added.
Fizzie-DWG (2026-06-20 07:49:01+00:00): Reverted
Glassman (2026-05-14 03:04:23+00:00): Same comment about the unclassified road
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182575851
Fizzie-DWG (2026-06-20 07:49:15+00:00): Reverted
Fizzie-DWG (2026-06-20 07:49:28+00:00): Reverted
Fizzie-DWG (2026-06-20 07:49:46+00:00): Reverted
Fizzie-DWG (2026-06-20 07:50:00+00:00): Reverted
Fizzie-DWG (2026-06-20 07:50:16+00:00): Reverted
Fizzie-DWG (2026-06-20 07:50:29+00:00): Reverted
Fizzie-DWG (2026-06-20 07:50:45+00:00): Reverted
Fizzie-DWG (2026-06-20 07:51:13+00:00): Reverted
Fizzie-DWG (2026-06-20 07:51:30+00:00): Reverted
Fizzie-DWG (2026-06-20 07:51:38+00:00): Reverted
Glassman (2026-05-14 03:03:39+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182576008
Glassman (2026-05-14 03:03:47+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182576008
Glassman (2026-05-14 03:03:51+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182576008
mueschel (2026-05-13 08:45:32+00:00): Please review these edits.

- adding strange tags like polaris:auto-seeded

- adding wrong tags like 'amenity=place'

- duplicating existing POIs

As-is this changeset should be reverted.
mueschel (2026-05-16 10:06:52+00:00): I reverted these imports - the amount of wrong entries and duplicates is just too large to be fixed.
ghobs91 (2026-05-16 10:28:37+00:00): No problem, apologies for that! Testing something out with my maps app and got some unexpected editing outcomes.
Glassman (2026-05-14 03:03:31+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182576164
webfil (2026-06-19 13:17:15+00:00): Greetings. Thanks for your edit. Tagging this element as leisure=park does not seem to me as a good practice. Parks are rather set in urban areas, with controlled greenery. I propose tagging this element as a sports centre (leisure=sports_centre), as it is a MTB and XC ski area.

I also split the part south of the road, since it is a private resort, accessible to customers only, and not a park.
mueschel (2026-05-13 08:46:20+00:00): This POI already exists - don't blindly upload external data without checking.
Glassman (2026-05-14 02:40:28+00:00): You removed the building tag. Can you add it back? The rest of the edit is good.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182576310
Glassman (2026-05-14 03:03:24+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182576376
Glassman (2026-05-14 02:40:43+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182576400
DaveF (2026-05-14 20:42:50+00:00): Placing it on top of station buildings clashes with that building's name label.
YEGDafydd (2026-05-14 23:49:38+00:00): My apologies - in the way it rendered on my screen (it may be the fact I look at "Transport Map" as my default view), it looked perfectly fine. I apologise for any inconvenience or confusion.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-13 08:35:02+00:00): Reverted SEO spam POI with advertising/nonsensical tags added with explicit source=* of Google Maps in violation of OSM policy and potentially copyright and contract law, in changeset 184046179

https://osm.org/changeset/184046179
Glassman (2026-05-14 03:03:16+00:00): #TIP: square bldgs by selecting the outline then just type a "q"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182576454
pwbriggs (2026-05-14 17:44:21+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Glassman this looks accurate—the building is not square IRL based on aerial imagery, or at least the roof isn't. Thanks https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Sierra%20DeFevers!
Glassman (2026-05-14 02:40:56+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182576464
Glassman (2026-05-14 02:42:13+00:00): We don't post personal information in OSM. Since this is no a business, the name and operator should be removed. Can you do that please?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182576472
LordGarySugar (2026-05-13 16:46:46+00:00): It is. concrete is not natural=bare_rock.
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-05-13 23:30:33+00:00): How else do I tag traffic island areas? Other cities use landuse=grass, but Vegas doesn't have a lot of grass due to being in a desert.
LordGarySugar (2026-05-13 23:43:53+00:00): You only need to use area:highway=traffic_island + surface=*. Traffic islands don't render on carto and that's ok, not everything has to.
Glassman (2026-05-14 03:02:49+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182576515
Glassman (2026-05-14 03:05:15+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182576552
Glassman (2026-05-14 03:02:38+00:00): unclassified roads are basically rural residential roads. Since it is connected to two service roads, it's likely just a service road. Can you please review this edit?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182576575
Glassman (2026-05-14 03:05:33+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182576695
Glassman (2026-05-14 03:01:18+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182576716
Glassman (2026-05-14 02:42:30+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182576723
user_5359 (2026-05-13 19:01:13+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1332615886. What is the mean of the tag  https://www.albula-alvra.ch/_docn/6309577/2025-11-14_118._Informationsbulletin_zum_Brienzer_Rutsch_web.pdf#page = 10 ?
citrula (2026-05-13 03:53:36+00:00): you are adding access=no and foot=no to roads. This is meant for legal restrictions only, not for the suitability of the road for that use case. My understanding is that you are allowed to walk on the feeder road in Texas, unless there is a sign stating otherwise. Is that the case here?
Fizzie-DWG (2026-06-20 05:25:15+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184339712
Abbie Vaskelis (2026-05-12 23:38:57+00:00): #cwugeog
FajrAl (2026-05-15 04:04:33+00:00): Terima kasih atas kontribusinya di Gunung Padang. Namun, ada baiknya jika detail hasil ekskavasi seperti ini dikelola dalam Web GIS tersendiri. Mengingat temuan batu memiliki variasi ukuran yang sangat detail (dari seukuran telapak tangan hingga kaki), penggunaan tag di peta OpenStreetMap perlu didiskusikan kembali. Objek mikro seperti ini kurang cocok menggunakan tag peta standar yang biasanya diperuntukkan bagi skala meso. Idealnya, data sedetail ini memang membutuhkan platform spasial khusus.
clambake92115 (2026-06-11 22:20:08+00:00): You are changing a lot of residential streets to living streets, and they are not that. living streets are very specific attributes, mostly used in europe. from the docs: 
"highway=living_street must represent a special road category indicated by some traffic sign.
If your country has no such traffic signs, you should simply use highway=residential."
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dliving_street#United_States