piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2024-10-04 13:39:17+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits, particularly those concerning the name you've added or modified.

It seems that some of these names are a bit unusual.

#NameCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-10-05 12:06:48+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157461102
pitscheplatsch (2024-10-05 12:07:26+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157461102
NeisBot (2024-10-04 13:36:22+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits, particularly those concerning the name you've added or modified.

It seems that some of these names are a bit unusual.

#NameCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-10-04 13:43:15+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157461263
pitscheplatsch (2024-10-05 12:07:05+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157461102
NeisBot (2024-10-04 13:37:25+00:00): I guess something went wrong here?
pitscheplatsch (2024-10-05 12:07:48+00:00): Partly reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157461102
pitscheplatsch (2024-10-04 13:42:48+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157461263
aceman444 (2026-07-07 07:32:59+00:00): Zdravim, zda sa, ze railway:traffic_mode sa pouziva iba na kolajach, nie na stanici. Pozrite https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:railway:traffic_mode a https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Dstation#Things_to_avoid
woodpeck_repair (2024-11-13 21:05:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159107632 where the changeset comment is: revert un-trustworthy/fictional golf mapping
JezCrow (2024-10-04 16:48:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by changeset 157470037 - reason: mass-deletion of nodes.
citrula (2024-10-12 08:42:37+00:00): Reagan is unincorporated, so it probably doesn't make too much sense to define it with a boundary. Also, the population you linked is for Reagan County, Texas - the population of Reagan is definitely much lower than that.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157461994
citrula (2024-10-12 08:43:24+00:00): Also, there is already a place node for Reagan - https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/151866612
aTarom (2024-10-05 07:19:47+00:00): Hola, bienvenidos a OSM, que desean introducir con
"convenio"="Erasmus"
"name"=Universidad Politécnica de Madrid"
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12222391016/history

"Convenio"="Magallanes"
"Titulación"="Grado"
"name"="Punto Primero"
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12222298687/history

¿Se trata de alguna prueba?
Saludos
ETSI Minas y Energía - UPM (2024-10-08 13:06:17+00:00): Si, estamos haciendo pruebas, intentando entender el funcionamiento de estos mapas.
aTarom (2024-10-08 14:05:03+00:00): Para dudas rápidas e informales tenemos el canal de Telegram
https://t.me/OSMes
para algo más extenso tenemos el foro
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/es/51
Saludos
Frans S (2024-10-05 12:20:58+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
C: Collecting adjacent buildings and mapped is as 1 building.
High building(s)sometimes incorrect mapped. See par 20 chapter About Buildings


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157462319
ika-chan! (2024-10-04 23:00:52+00:00): I am getting concerned about this changeset, where you decided to delete and replace a lot of ways instead of just updating them.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157462343
ika-chan! (2024-10-07 00:12:24+00:00): Changeset 157462343 was reverted because the changeset comment did not explain the mass replacement of ways.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157560934
ika-chan! (2024-10-07 00:16:22+00:00): In addition, there is no evidence that the connecting road was part of the EO8a. I think it is most likely a service road.
Nathan_A_RF (2024-10-14 13:29:20+00:00): Incorrect how? This was changed to 40 recently. I drove the road myself
sb9576 (2024-12-19 10:51:43+00:00): You. Are. Awesome!!!

Amazing stuff. Please keep it up 👏😀.
NeisBot (2024-10-04 14:10:29+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits, particularly those concerning the name you've added or modified.

It seems that some of these names are a bit unusual.

#NameCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-10-05 12:09:34+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157497707
citrula (2024-10-12 08:44:21+00:00): In the US, we use the 2 letter abbreviation for addr:state
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157462563
Pavel_Š (2024-10-12 11:44:48+00:00): V tomto changesetu se Ti povedlo vymazat většinu zastávek na N92.  Opravím to, ale děsí mě, co na mě ještě vykoukne a kolik času mi to vezme :(
Pavel_Š (2024-10-12 13:49:17+00:00): V této sadě také zmizely prakticky všechny zastávky z linky N93. Tedy musím vše znovu oťukat v JOSM. Ať už používáš jakékoliv nástroje na úpravy, prosím, nepoužívej je. Evidentně dělají jen paseku.
Dodko (2024-10-09 10:30:35+00:00): Adresa je na budove https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/61126750/history stačí ju len raz.
eggie (2024-10-04 16:05:47+00:00): Dag uniteam   Geen motor_vehicle = no toevoegen. Dat geeft weer andere problemen.
Autoverkeer wordt per default gestopt. Wel de uitzonderingen toevoegen.
Bv motorcycle=yes  en/of horse=yes als die er langsmogen en kunnen.
Ik verwijder de -no tags.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Tag:barrier%3Dbollard

MVG
eggie
uniteam (2024-10-05 05:46:33+00:00): Hallo eggie. De bollard zorgt er iig voor dat de weg in principe doodlopend is behalve voor fietsers, zoals het bord aan het begin van de weg aangeeft.
eggie (2024-10-05 06:23:31+00:00): Duidelijk... maar mijn opmerking sloeg op de manier van access tagging.
We zetten geen motor_vehicle=no op een paaltje. Dat kan weer problemen geven bij brom en snorfietsen.
Wel kun je de uitzonderingen op dr defaults toevoegen. Bv motorcycle=yes als die er wel doormogen. Zie wiki..
Groet..
eggie
eggie (2024-10-04 15:56:14+00:00): Dag uniteam...  Lastig te beoordelen. Welke borden staan hier.
Je hoeft geen bicycle en foot=yes toe te voegen aan een highway=residential. Dat is default.
Hoe zit het met mofa en moped hier? Die worden nu gestopt door motor_vehicle=no
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-10-04 16:02:45+00:00): Beetje onduidelijke situatie. 
Ik heb twee paaltje toegevoegd. Dat houdt automatisch motorvoertuigen tegen.
motor_vehicle zou je kunnen verwijderen. 
MVG
eggie
onovy (2024-10-12 16:37:37+00:00): Ahoj,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12218960408

transformator na sloupu el. vedeni se znaci jako
power=pole
transformer=distribution

viz. dokumentace:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Elektrick%C3%A1_veden%C3%AD

Opravil jsem.

Dekuji.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-30 10:10:31+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12222453861/history has fixme:type = fix that was added in this edit
what should be fixed here? do you need help with selecting better tags?
Silva1989 (2024-10-04 14:41:42+00:00): source is Bing; Azores Trails
map per (2024-10-15 19:45:19+00:00): Hallo DL1MIH,

Wegen review_requested:
Ob die Änderungen hier gut sind hängt davon ab, ob das wirklich zwei baulich getrennte Gebäude sind oder ein Gebäude mit zwei Adressen:
-Bei zwei Gebäuden ist alles richtig eingezeichnet
- Bei einem Gebäude sollte auch nur ein Gebäude in OSM eingezeichnet werden. Die zwei Adressen werden dann als separate Adresspunkte gemapped.

Viele Grüße
map per
damianeue (2024-10-04 14:43:16+00:00): also: added turning limitations - fixed roundabouts geometry - added water areas
totera (2026-06-05 22:30:52+00:00): Dalle immagini Bing non mi pare che questo senso unico sia corretto: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1320749909
damianeue (2026-06-07 16:55:36+00:00): grazie della segnalazione, ho appena corretto e ho anche fatto altre migliorie all'area: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183790667
conradoos (2024-10-25 19:11:20+00:00): Cześć, zduplikowałeś drogi na rondzie - to jest prawdopodobnie błąd narzędzia, którego używasz, czyli osm-relatify
silversurfer83 (2024-10-04 19:47:12+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap :)

danke, dass du hilfst die Karte aktuell zu halten. Speziell solche Updates hier sind sehr wichtig.

Dazu hätte ich auch direkt eine Anmerkung: Es dauert bei solchen Adressänderungen naturgemäß ewig, bis alle Welt davon Notiz genommen hat. Daher behalten wir die alten Werte noch eine Weile in der Datenbank. Das kann zum Beispiel mit dem Präfix "was:*=*" erreicht werden. Beispiel:
Aus "addr:street=Kirchplatz" wird "was:addr:street=Kirchplatz". Diese Werte kannst du im Klartext in der linken Spalte sehen, wenn du ein Objekt ausgewählt hast. Scroll dort bis ganz unten zum Abschnitt "Eigenschaften".

Bei Fragen immer raus damit
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157464551
Fischkopp0815 (2024-10-08 10:26:58+00:00): Ich war heute vor Ort.Der gesamte Siegfried-Lenz-Weg ist keine Einbahnstraße. Es gibt aber Abbiegebeschränkungen an den Ecken Theodor-Storm-Str. und Klaus-Groth-Str. (DE:267,1022-10) . Ich habe das entsprechend geändert.
jimbojones (2024-10-27 19:36:44+00:00): Meine Eingabe war eventuell nicht ganz korrekt, da ich nur auf eine Frage in der StreetComplete App geantwortet habe.
Tatsächlich ist der Siegfried-Lenz-Weg jeweils von der Claus-Harms-Strasse nach Norden zur Theodor-Storm-Strasse und nach Süden zur Klaus-Groth-Strasse eine Einbahnstrasse.
Man kann also weder von Norden noch Süden durch den Siegfried-Lenz-Weg zur Claus-Harms-Strasse fahren. Ausgenommen sind Radfahrer.
Frans S (2024-10-05 13:00:17+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please do not add layers to a building.
They are not hanging in the air.
Best regards
Luzandro (2024-10-17 17:27:39+00:00): Hallo Walter,

danke, dass du den Fischa-Radweg überarbeitest. Speziell der Gatsch-Abschnitt hinter Mitterndorf war mir schon länger ein Dorn im Auge und ich hatte schon lange vor zu schauen, wo tatsächlich etwas beschildert ist und wo der Radweg endet.
WaWei (2024-11-06 15:15:35+00:00): Hallo Andreas,
war einige Zeit nicht auf meinen Mails - daher die späte Reaktion.
Hier der Anlass für die Änderung des Fischa-Radweges:
 https://www.openstreetmap.org/messages/1202517
Luzandro (2024-11-07 07:21:46+00:00): Das ist ein Link zu einer privaten Nachricht, da kann ich nichts lesen
bxl-forever (2024-10-04 19:49:58+00:00): Hello,

I don’t think that "(formally Foto Gregor)" should be part of the name, unless it is explicitely marked as being  the name.  Was this the case here?

Should there really be a need to mark the former name of a place in OSM, you should use the "old_name" key.
kcaisley (2024-10-05 12:02:52+00:00): Yes, I think the way I noted this isn’t great. The issue is, the store was acquired by Kamera Express (a Dutch corp), and the website/interior and employees are all now Kamera Express. But the facade and exterior signage on the store are maintained as “Foto Gregor” as I suppose it has name recognition, and the facade may even be protected for historical reasons? Anybody looking for the “Kamera Express” name from the street would be confused.

Happy to follow whatever the guidelines are for this sort of case.
kcaisley (2024-10-05 12:05:58+00:00): I’ve updated it with the old_name tag 👍🏻
bxl-forever (2024-10-05 12:53:05+00:00): OK, thanks.

Don’t forget to upload your changes, because so far the tags have not been modified, it looks like they are still in your own device and not pushed to the database.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-10-04 15:11:02+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11510069814
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/803413928

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
conradoos (2024-10-25 19:10:44+00:00): Cześć, zduplikowałeś drogi na rondzie - to jest prawdopodobnie błąd narzędzia, którego używasz, czyli osm-relatify
VictorIE (2024-12-17 15:57:44+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12222536541

Is this "Newry Post Office"?
jmty8 (2024-10-04 16:08:39+00:00): right hashtag #mapbox_missing_roads
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157466338
Maksim Hradaboyeu (2024-10-07 07:05:50+00:00): Added missing roads according to Bing Maps Aerial
#mapbox_missing_roads
Anton_Klebanovich (2024-10-09 06:55:17+00:00): Hello! Thanks for your feedback
ilias_ (2024-10-04 16:11:45+00:00): Hi! Please try to separate your edits in Portugal and in Madeira as they cover all of the Casablanca region. Thank you.
Alexmol (2024-10-04 18:24:16+00:00): Hi, thank you for the heads up, I believe JOSM has a way to split changesets, I'll try to configure it.

Thanks
Alexandre
NeisBot (2024-10-04 15:38:38+00:00): Hi MattBridle, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 83% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 473 building(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=157467094
MattBridle (2024-10-04 16:42:54+00:00): It was intentional, I am currently trying to update the building data in that area and it was easier to delete the existing polygons and create new ones.
ObscureAngel (2024-10-07 05:45:47+00:00): Bonjour, merci pour votre contribution :-)

A l'avenir veuillez noter qu'il est recommandé de mettre des commentaires plus précis sur vos groupes de changements (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bons_commentaires_de_groupe_de_modifications)

Aussi, qu'avez-vous voulu décrire par vos changements ici ? Est-ce un arrêt de bus ?

Merci beaucoup, passez une bonne journée et bonne cartographie ! :-)
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157467477
Глеб (2024-10-14 09:47:59+00:00): (╥﹏╥)
eggie (2024-10-04 18:36:49+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
ika-chan! (2024-10-04 22:57:45+00:00): If I recall correctly, the link road over the A5 has a central reservation. Why did you merge those ways?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157467947
ObscureAngel (2024-10-07 05:42:24+00:00): Bonjour, merci pour votre contribution :-)

A l'avenir veuillez noter qu'il est recommandé de mettre des commentaires plus précis sur vos groupes de changements (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bons_commentaires_de_groupe_de_modifications)

Aussi, veillez à ce que vos changements reflètent la réalité ;-) je doute très fortement que l'A1 passe au Mans au milieu d'un quartier résidentiel.

Merci beaucoup, passez une bonne journée et bonne cartographie ! :-)
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157468182
jmty8 (2024-10-04 16:08:49+00:00): right hashtag #mapbox_missing_roads
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157468233
yanglan (2024-10-04 16:05:53+00:00): where?
jmty8 (2024-10-04 16:09:16+00:00): right hashtag #mapbox_missing_roads
Hufkratzer (2024-10-04 18:26:15+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1320767131 is a riding arena/ring and not a riding center (leisure=horse_riding). In OSM rising arenas/rings are usually tagged leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian, example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1228324917
Strubbl (2024-10-05 20:21:29+00:00): Hallo Hans, vielen Dank für die Rückmeldung zu der Taverne. Ich habe den gelöschten Node wiederhergestellt und ihn auf disused gesetzt, sodass man im Falle eines neuen Pächters den Node schnell wieder als POI in Betrieb nehmen kann und die Historie vom Objekt erhalten bleibt.

(Mit disused meine ich https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:disused:*)

Löschen würde ich POIs nur, wenn das Geschäft nicht mehr existiert, also auch nicht mehr leerstehend. 

Viele Grüße
Frans S (2024-10-10 13:18:16+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please do not collect buildings.
Each building need to be mapped individually 
Best regards
mcliquid (2024-10-04 16:35:47+00:00): Hi and thank you for your contribution!

Please note for the future: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
ivanbranco (2024-10-05 12:11:48+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14404

you changed natural=water with building=yes. I suppose it's an error
ManuelB701 (2024-10-05 20:08:59+00:00): That also explains the big bounding box: The changes were supposed to be in the US but it accidentally included a fountain(?) in Hamburg all the way in Germany.
Dwain Zwerg (2025-01-08 08:33:14+00:00): #14404: It is a small, probably man-made duck pond. It would have been nice if you had fixed your mistake three months ago.
woodpeck_repair (2024-11-13 21:05:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159107632 where the changeset comment is: revert un-trustworthy/fictional golf mapping
woodpeck_repair (2024-11-13 21:06:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159107632 where the changeset comment is: revert un-trustworthy/fictional golf mapping
woodpeck_repair (2024-12-02 23:54:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 159862440, 159862427, 159862512, 159862481, 159862457, 159862433 where the changeset comment is: revert roblox_gmx edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16954
ObscureAngel (2024-10-07 05:36:42+00:00): Bonjour, merci pour votre contribution :-)

A l'avenir veuillez noter qu'il est recommandé de mettre des commentaires plus précis sur vos groupes de changements (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bons_commentaires_de_groupe_de_modifications)

Merci beaucoup, passez une bonne journée et bonne cartographie ! :-)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157470476
ObscureAngel (2024-10-07 05:35:52+00:00): Bonjour, merci pour votre contribution :-)

A l'avenir veuillez noter qu'il est recommandé de mettre des commentaires plus précis sur vos groupes de changements (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bons_commentaires_de_groupe_de_modifications)

Merci beaucoup, passez une bonne journée et bonne cartographie ! :-)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157470551
rohieb (2024-10-27 23:26:41+00:00): Hier scheinen mehrere verschiedene Dinge in einem Changeset vermischt worden zu sein. die crossing:markings und die Wikidata-Änderungen gehen wohl in Ordnung, aber die highway=pedestrian + area=yes auf der Friedrich-Wilhelm-Straße habe ich in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158422812 wieder eingefügt, da area:highway nicht von OSM Carto gerendert wird. Die beiden Ansätzehighways als areas zu mappen sind verschieden weit verbreitet, und solange sie sich nicht widersprechen, können sie parallel benutzt werden. Bitte daher nicht ein valides Tagging-Schema zugunsten eines anderen verwerfen, solange beide kompatibel sind.
rohieb (2024-10-27 23:32:11+00:00): (Nebenbemerkung, mir ist etwas ähnliches hier schon bei vielen Bushaltestellen aufgefallen, wo vor Jahren einmal mit dem Kommentar "auf Public Transport v2 umgestellt" die highway=bus_stop's auf den Punkten zugunsten von public_transport=platform entfernt wurde. Das hat dann im Endeffekt die Unterstützung in vielen Anwendungen kaputt gemacht, die nur das alte Schema implementiert hatten, und Leute haben sich gewundert, wo die Bushaltestellen hin sind… siehe z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3914654 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3761071 für Hintergrundinfos.)
woodpeck_repair (2024-11-13 21:05:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159107632 where the changeset comment is: revert un-trustworthy/fictional golf mapping
bxl-forever (2024-10-04 17:31:40+00:00): Your changeset title says "Building".

This is a really lame description which provides no real content.  Please be aware that contributions on OSM are public and other users are affected by your actions.  We expect users to write meaningful titles, as courtesy to fellow mappers.

Another problem: instead of mapping a building, you drew a simple polygon with "area=yes" as its tags.  Such a shape will not be rendered, it just clutters the map.  I am sure you have good intentions, perhaps it would be useful to redo the tutorial or read the wiki to learn a bit more about OSM works.

Kind regards.
Smiley-666 (2024-10-04 17:45:43+00:00): This person has been repetitive in these changes, an offender. I think they're using it to mask their location
Branko Kokanovic (2024-10-05 15:06:26+00:00): heya! I see you delete old addresses? Idea is to keep them inOSM as lot of things still points to them. They all have time of removal, so it will be easy to remove them in 5-10 years. This is what we agreed on forum. Are you deleting some specific adresses?
anshanin (2024-10-05 17:19:29+00:00): Hi, I usually only delete addresses with removed:ref:RS:kucni_broj where there are no visible buildings (it means they were demolished years ago or never even existed). Do you think this is wrong?
Branko Kokanovic (2024-10-05 17:51:06+00:00): I guess if you delete only those where there is no building... that is fine...I would not delete even these, but it is just me:)
anshanin (2024-10-06 11:59:13+00:00): I didn't realize that the original idea was to keep such addresses so I will focus on other activities. Thanks for letting me know.
SekeRob (2024-10-06 06:44:00+00:00): Hi,

Where do cars go now coming from Via Giuseppe Garibaldi past the church & square as Corso Umberto Primo is one way opposite directions on the part south of your 'foot only'? Something must have change there too to get out e.g. to Pz Spedalieri and Pz Azzia?

cheers