piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Yukiro (2025-12-26 09:55:34+00:00): Zgadzam się z Mateuszem, ja bym dodał ten building=ruins z powrotem
JoeG (2025-12-31 00:02:07+00:00): Hi! I intend to revert delete fences in this one.
dzamper (2025-12-23 09:51:32+00:00): „błędów” tzn. czego? bo widzę że zostały odklejone adresy od obrysów budynków ale takie coś to przecież nie jest błąd
bartgron (2025-12-23 14:41:45+00:00): Według mnie jest to błąd, oprócz tego usunąłem duplikat parkingu oraz dodałem miasto do adresu Stokrotki
dzamper (2025-12-23 19:52:02+00:00): no to mamy problem

bo okazuje się, że dodawanie adresów na obrysach budynków to wg OSM Wiki nie tylko nie jest błędem, ale nawet i jest podobno preferowanym sposobem na terenie Polski…

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses#Buildings_with_multiple_house_numbers

co teras?
fortera_au (2025-12-22 23:18:22+00:00): Hi, you've added these as just name=Sump, what are these actually meant to be? The name tag is for signed names, not descriptive names.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176285210
JoeG (2025-12-27 07:17:39+00:00): Is there a reason that fences are being deleted?
eggie (2025-12-23 05:49:10+00:00): Hoi.. C15 is verboden voor (brom)fietsers.
Klopt dat hier wel?
Mvg
eggie
eggie (2025-12-23 07:11:41+00:00): Verkeersbord C15 heb ik verwijderd.
Dat staat er niet.
Zie https://wegkenmerken.ndw.nu/kaart?kaartlagen=BRT,SPEED_LIMIT,TRAFFIC_SIGN&maxsnelheidfilter=1f5451a0.________Dw&verkeersbordfilter=a5790999._____________________________38D&zichtbaar-gebied=6.03378,52.46985,6.04462,52.47334

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-12-23 07:32:28+00:00): C15 nog even teruggezet.
Op de luchtfoto van Slagboom&Peeters zie ik geen verkeersbord. Staat het wellicht op een ander bord? 
Vrij wandelen e.d.
JohnnyWvD (2025-12-23 19:40:51+00:00): nee verbod fietsen en bromfietsen
omdat het prive terrein is kun je met streetview dat niet zien.
het is een landgoed, opengesteld voor voetgangers (= Kompenpad), maar moutainbikers zijn hondsbrutaal en rijden dus door iemands tuin.
Overigens geldt voor elk klompenpad een verbod voor fietsen
eggie (2025-12-23 19:51:39+00:00): Oke.. duidelijk... Tja...  Ook al klopt het in OSM.. sommige mensen hebben nu eenmaal een bord voor hun hoofd en negeren alles. In OSM routeert het niet.
NeisBot (2025-12-27 15:52:29+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13383620284 v2

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Wellness center in Beaver Dam"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description
NeisBot (2026-01-01 17:56:55+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/176713367
eggie (2025-12-23 05:46:47+00:00): Dag Johan..
C7 is een bord wandelpad. Het blauwe bord met de wandelaar met kind?
Mvg..
eggie
eggie (2025-12-23 07:06:07+00:00): hgv =no toegevoegd C7 verwijderd.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-12-23 07:14:42+00:00): Ahh Je hebt gelijk..   Zal C7 weer terugzetten.
eggie (2025-12-23 07:17:16+00:00): Die borden doen niets met de routering.. De tag hgv = no regelt de routering.
JohnnyWvD (2025-12-23 19:41:39+00:00): de gehele weg Vuursteenberg van begin tot einde geld een vrachtwagen verbod: NL:C07
via navigatie neemt toch vrachtvervoer deze als sluiproute, wellicht helpt deze eigenschap.
via streetview zie je duidelijk de NL:C07 borden her en der.
eggie (2025-12-23 19:54:22+00:00): Nee..  dat bord doet niets in OSM. Ik heb (zie boven) hgv =no toegevoegd aan de Vuursteenberg.
Gebruikers van een app voor vrachtverkeer zullen dus niet routeren hier. In OSM routeert het dus niet voor vrachtverkeer (hgv=no) 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:hgv
arvelius (2025-12-23 08:31:32+00:00): The WD object Q271320 is considering the whole connected system of Åsunden, Yttre Åsunden and Torpasjön. I've tried to add a relation for the three lankes and link that relation to WD but got reverted. If you know how to do that properly help would be appreciated. Right now this connection is misleading. If you can read Swedish there is a discussion in the corresponding Swedish Wikipedia page https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diskussion:%C3%85sunden,_V%C3%A4sterg%C3%B6tland#Identitet
TheDJ (2025-12-23 11:55:54+00:00): Well i can't help with that. if OSM people don't want to recognize a certain relation as being a relation, then you cannot link to it from Wikidata
TheDJ (2025-12-23 11:58:54+00:00): For reference to others, the OSM relation in question is https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17973382 and discussion started at https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17973382/history/6
Taya_S (2025-12-23 08:24:30+00:00): Reverted vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176296071
SpinOff (2025-12-23 12:13:15+00:00): Hej. W OSM nazwą drogi może być tylko oficjalna nazwa: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Pl:Znakowanie_dr%C3%B3g_w_Polsce#Nazewnictwo_ulic

W przypadku nazw używanych przez lokalną ludność, można rozważyć życie tagu loc_name (nazwa lokalna): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Nazwy
Marc Mongenet (2025-12-23 01:28:37+00:00): C'est un peu dommage d'introduire un faux virage sur l'autoroute alors que le placement=right_of:1 permet justement de mapper simplement, d'avoir un bon rendu naïf, tout en étant précis.
Taya_S (2025-12-23 08:24:31+00:00): Reverted vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176296071
SzymonH (2025-12-23 08:29:15+00:00): Trochę bzdura, bo tutaj jest dozwolony lewoskręt - jest nawet dedykowany pas do skrętu w lewo widoczny na użytej przez Ciebie warstwie. Relacja została pewnie po skasowaniu rozdzielonych jezdni i teraz powinna zostać skasowana.
eigenval (2025-12-23 21:59:19+00:00): Relacja usunięta w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176327952 - dzięki za zwrócenie uwagi
NeisBot (2025-12-23 01:00:22+00:00): Hi dschug, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 89% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 119 addr(s)
- 44 amenity(s)
- 13 barrier(s)
- 49 building(s)
- 2 emergency(s)
- 96 highway(s)
- 1 historic(s)
- 4 man_made(s)
- 41 name(s)
- 22 natural(s)
- 1 office(s)
- 13 public_transport(s)
- 56 railway(s)
- 9 shop(s)
- 8 source(s)
- 73 surface(s)
- 5 tourism(s)
- 4 wikidata(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=176287483
chnuessli (2025-12-23 06:24:55+00:00): Looks like a big mistake... can you please revert your changeset?
d_berger (2025-12-23 06:56:00+00:00): Reverted for blatant vandalism with CS 176293655 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176293655)
Taya_S (2025-12-23 08:30:22+00:00): Please see: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19202
dzamper (2025-12-23 10:13:23+00:00): Trochę nie rozumiem tego zestawu zmian bo według tego co zapamiętałem to usunąłeś `maxspeed:variable=yes` z miejsc gdzie są tablice zmiennej prędkości a dodałeś `maxspeed:variable=yes` tam gdzie tablice tej roli nie pełnią
stasiu512 (2025-12-23 11:07:17+00:00): cześć, które fragmenty usunięte masz na myśli? mógłbyś podać przykład błędny na jezdni południowej? jak na razie zająłem się tylko drogą w kierunku Katowic, jezdnia północna jest tak jak była
stasiu512 (2025-12-23 12:36:42+00:00): Skończyłem jezdnię północną, jeśli masz jakieś uwagi to zapraszam do dyskusji, najlepiej z przykładami linii które są błędne. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176305858#map=14/50.29257/18.70259
Pozdrawiam:)
dzamper (2025-12-23 21:50:23+00:00): OK, tam gdzie `maxspeed:variable` zostały usunięte to rozumiem że z uwagi na koniec ich obowiązywania z uwagi na wjazd czyli skrzyżowanie. No to by było faktycznie poprawne, trochę się niepotrzebnie oburzyłem.
Co do tego gdzie moim zdaniem jest nadmiarowe – tam gdzie zostało dodane na wschód od węzła z A1. Tam są teoretycznie ZZT, ale one nic nie wyświetlają. Jedynie chwilowo migający znak obowiązującego ograniczenia nad pasem jeśli ktoś na nim je przekroczy.
stasiu512 (2025-12-23 22:10:22+00:00): A te znaki nie są zaprojektowane też w taki sposób aby w razie wypadku/kolizji czy nawet zagęszczenia ruchu nie ograniczyć bardziej prędkości? Nawet w przypadku małego remontu myślę że są w stanie chwilowo ograniczyć prędkość. Nie jeżdże trasą codziennie więc ciężko mi to określić, powiedz które z tych na wschód od A1 mam usunąć? https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2hJG 
Pamiętam że ten odcinek na jezdni północnej był już dodany.
eggie (2025-12-23 07:00:51+00:00): Merged info with addressnode.
Please use the present addressnode
eggie (2025-12-23 06:57:18+00:00): Hi,

Hi please use the present addressnode
gr eggie
eggie (2025-12-23 06:56:17+00:00): Please don't add info on the map that is already there, I will delete your contribution.
Gr eggie
Taya_S (2025-12-23 08:24:32+00:00): Reverted vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176296071
MassCartog (2025-12-23 16:46:11+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM. You have a new account and might not be aware, private driveways are a valid feature to map in OSM and should not be removed. 

The correct way to handle this is to use OSM's tagging system. access=private, or access=no would be appropriate if they are closed to the public.

Please read this for more info:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won't_delete_roads_on_private_property
Tommy Kuehn (2025-12-23 17:07:28+00:00): The western road I removed does not exist any more.
MassCartog (2025-12-23 18:49:57+00:00): Hi thanks for the reply! I was referring to the driveways not the road. If a road doesn't exist any longer you definitely can remove it from the map.
kingkingHK (2025-12-23 03:11:19+00:00): I have reverted this changeset in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176289492 for the following reasons:

1. You have a history of messing with osm data in an attempt to fix a problem with your router.
2. Misunderstanding on how routers work; they don't always update instantly.
3. Please don't delete ways with 10+ versions of history and redraw it.
4. Geometry is worsened after redrawing.
5. Tunnel snapped with unrelated building.
6. Changed `layer=` from -1 to -7 for no apparent reason.
7. `name:en` removed for no apparent reason.
8. I am pretty sure the official name is 中九龍幹線, not 中九龍幹綫.
user_5359 (2025-12-23 09:25:57+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database.
Please only draw in existing objects and facts. I have now reverted your changes.
AgusQui (2025-12-24 03:09:06+00:00): Sigue cortado!
No se cual es tu fuente, deberias dejar de usarla, es la segunda vez que volves a la normalidad esta zona que sigue en obras
Baloo Uriza (2025-12-23 14:35:53+00:00): If you're copying the names from Bing Maps, we can't accept those due to copyright.  Tracing from the Aerial photography is OK as OSM has permission for that.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176289811
geosteven (2025-12-23 15:41:21+00:00): I am not copying street names based on Bing Maps. Street names are based upon personal experience running the roads in this area via CityStrides.
Baloo Uriza (2025-12-24 00:35:52+00:00): Awesome!  Just wanting to make sure since we do occasionally get folks who weren't quite so quick to pick up on that nuance.  Glad to have the help!
geosteven (2025-12-26 02:01:54+00:00): I should've made these edits previously, but wasn't using OSM when I was running in this area. I'm happy to make the map better for others.
NeisBot (2025-12-27 15:52:36+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/953221841 v4

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Motel in downtown Medford"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description
NeisBot (2026-01-01 17:56:56+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/176520963
Thanks @chath_tsu
NeisBot (2025-12-27 15:28:00+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 80 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/230405324 v45 | 18 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1110050188 v2 | 12 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1110050187 v2 | 11 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/7209327970 v3

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=176290054
NeisReview (2026-01-04 07:20:37+00:00): ✅ Should by fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/176384458
user_5359 (2025-12-25 17:43:11+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice the difference between a name and a description. 
If you need more information (and cannot find any examples or ask anyone else), please visit our wiki at https://wiki.osm.org.
Eduardo17172 (2025-12-23 04:14:28+00:00): Link correcto= https://www.instagram.com/reel/C8Ln_lZsoKA/?igsh=MXczeWl1ZjR5d2ZhMA
Eduardo17172 (2025-12-23 04:16:18+00:00): Seleccionar y abrir en modo incognito para ver video
wirabdillah (2026-01-27 03:29:14+00:00): Hi, is there any reason why you remove the boundary=administrative tag?
Dwaze_TNP (2025-12-23 12:45:42+00:00): Hello,

how & where can i edit this ?
i contributed via the CoMaps app.

 Best Regards
kingkingHK (2025-12-23 07:04:27+00:00): 1. Please don't trolltag (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Trolltag). Use `proposed:building=*`.
2. "Proposed Campus Extension of The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology at Clear Water Bay" is a `description=`, not a `name=`.
NeisBot (2025-12-27 16:08:12+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13396885084 v1

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Law firm representing clients in Pennsylvania and New Jersey"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description
NeisBot (2026-01-01 17:56:57+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/176297875
Thanks @user_5359
NeisBot (2025-12-27 16:08:13+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13396874800 v1

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Law firm California"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description
NeisBot (2026-01-01 17:56:57+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/176297820
Thanks @user_5359
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-03 21:22:36+00:00): In changeset 183614579, nuked SEO spam POI explicitly cited as being sourced from Google Maps

https://osm.org/changeset/183614579
AntMadeira (2025-12-23 14:56:14+00:00): Hello, FrancisEmmanuelCalingo.
I noticed that you added the population to some villages in Azores, but the values are not correct.
Mind you that Wikipedia values are related to parishes (freguesias in Portugal), not places.

Regards,
António.
keithonearth (2025-12-29 05:58:35+00:00): Can you confirm that the stairs have been removed in reality, not just public access prohibited?
wctapp (2025-12-29 16:29:44+00:00): I believe the stairs are still there - Parks just removed the first access ladder to get to them from the beach. 

I also did not delete the beach option trail that spurs off the forest junction to the lighthouse grounds. Wasn't quite sure how to deal with that - as the trail is still there, but it's not an option for WCT hikers anymore. Maybe trail stays and gets labelled 'private property', or a whole new shaded region gets added on top of lightstation grounds stating they are closed to public.
焱霁阳 (2025-12-23 05:13:54+00:00): 勘误：武陵区-德山
B252697 (2026-07-27 13:56:52+00:00): Hi, I think you have mapped the Healing Garden boundary incorrectly. This is official map from Singapore National Parks (NParks) on the boundary for Healing Garden:
https://isomer-user-content.by.gov.sg/152/c30f195b-524e-4384-9b8f-969a2fe28245/Map%20Current%20PDF%20040326.pdf
confusedbuffalo (2026-07-27 15:09:20+00:00): I seem to remember that the outline here was broken, possibly unclosed or something, so that was my fix. I don't think I was aligning it to a known outline. I did visit the Botanical Gardens but I don't remember the exact outline for the Healing Garden.

Without further information, I am assuming that the map you provided is copyrighted and not suitable for use with OSM so I don't think I can make any edits here, apologies
B252697 (2026-07-27 15:30:17+00:00): No worries and thanks for letting me know! I'm a local Singapore Citizen with personal knowledge of Botanic Gardens. I was just walking there earlier today (27 Jul), and I've personally walked Botanic Gardens many times. I'll consider adjusting accordingly based on my local knowledge and the official map: https://isomer-user-content.by.gov.sg/152/c30f195b-524e-4384-9b8f-969a2fe28245/Map%20Current%20PDF%20040326.pdf
NeisBot (2025-12-27 16:08:15+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13396927852 v1

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Roofing company in Sherman Oaks"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description
NeisBot (2026-01-01 17:56:57+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/176297761
Thanks @user_5359
the_third_man (2025-12-23 10:15:41+00:00): Wouldn't it be more efficient in this case to remove the availability times from the website and enter them in a readable format? Then the user wouldn't have to go to the trouble of frantically trying to find this information.
Hung Tran 9x0 (2025-12-30 14:23:59+00:00): Tôi thấy bạn đặt tên cho 'construction' là Vinschool là không đúng, không thể có Vinschool với diện tích lớn như vậy được. Bạn không nên thêm những chỉnh sửa không chính xác như thế này.
joost schouppe (2026-01-05 12:58:49+00:00): Hoi Wim,
Je hebt hier een brandweerstation (als "voorziening") van gemaakt, maar die was reeds gemapped als een wat grotere polygoon. Het zou wel juist zijn er een brandweerstation als gebouw van te maken. Binnen streetcomplete lijkt me dit natuurlijk nogal lastig te zien en te volgen. Ik pas het alvast aan.
Taya_S (2025-12-23 08:09:07+00:00): Reverted deletions

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176295629
wolfgang8 (2025-12-30 20:21:04+00:00): Hallo,
die Löschung des place-Node "Himberg" war vermutlich ein Versehen - ist jetzt wiederhergestellt:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176645673
Glassman (2025-12-24 03:08:46+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176293210
KbggTArgPUkyDCXz53wj (2025-12-23 06:37:18+00:00): Note that the building is mixed_use and includes Oakridge Physio which is already present in OSM (and other businesses) at street level, but they have their own addresses.

I'm not sure if it should be a single mixed user building with multiple addresses in that case, or a condo building with businesses with their own addresses like it has with this change.
Ruben Van de Velde (2026-01-02 14:21:08+00:00): ⭐
NeisBot (2025-12-27 16:08:17+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/29822894 v9

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Courier service in Vancouver"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description
NeisBot (2026-01-01 17:57:46+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/176294256
Thanks @eerib
NeisBot (2025-12-27 16:08:19+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13018106892 v2

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Shipping company UniUni"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description
Mehran Motiee (2025-12-24 16:17:20+00:00): به نظر اشتباه شده
user_5359 (2025-12-23 09:10:58+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please move the node to a building and check the opening_hours value (only open on Monday?).
eggie (2025-12-23 08:34:20+00:00): Dag karol.. Wanneer je een huisnummer verandert is het oude wel verdwenen van de kaart.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-12-23 08:36:13+00:00): Bestaat Fit for Free hier nog? Zelfde adres?
eggie (2025-12-23 11:32:15+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Frans S (2026-01-15 11:25:56+00:00): Hello. Back again.
You clustered numerous buildings.
Each building needs to be mapped individually.
Best regards.
Frans S (2026-01-15 11:23:57+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping. Your mappings are rather accurate, however, you did not square each building.
Best regards
eggie (2025-12-23 08:39:01+00:00): Hi,
Please comment your edits properly.


Some more observations?

Greetz,
eggie
symac (2026-01-17 17:51:15+00:00): Dis Vicolapatat tu as vu la boite à livres en décembre ? Je n'ai rien vu en y passant tout à l'heure et celle qui existait il y a quelques mois avait brûlé et avait retiré, je m'interroge donc s'il y en a une qui avait été réinstallée depuis et a déjà été retirée ou si quand tu as fait l'ajout en décembre c'était sur la base de souvenirs ?
Vicolapatat (2026-01-18 14:06:18+00:00): Bonjour Symac c’est sur la base des mes souvenirs en effet. 
Ça fait plusieurs semaines/mois que je ne suis pas passé devant avec attention.