piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NorthCrab (2023-01-08 12:28:39+00:00): Poprawne oznaczenie foot=no to gdy zobaczysz np. taki znak: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:PL_road_sign_B-41.svg

Więcej informacji o znakach: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Road_signs_in_Poland
sieminsk (2023-01-08 12:31:12+00:00): poprawie przejścia. rozumiem co jest w nich źle zrobione. dodam węzły i je potaguje  wyspami tam gdzie żeszywiście występują.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-01-08 23:09:40+00:00): por favor, não coloque nomes genéricos quando não sabe o nome como fez em pizzaria e reciclagem  aqui: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10313491059
abakus_uploader (2023-01-07 23:33:56+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
andrewsuzuki (2023-01-08 03:09:33+00:00): I'll have to check out the new trails here soon! If you haven't already, I'd recommend checking out the new "CT ECO Shaded Relief" imagery that Mashin set up. It think it's available in iD. Probably not that useful for the new trails, but the resolution is so good that you can clearly see many older trails carved out into the earth. It should be more accurate than a single gpx recording, in the woods at least.
John Goldin (2023-01-08 14:11:17+00:00): Thanks for this info. The CT ECO Shaded Relief is remarkable and I can see several places where I would alter the trail marking a bit based on this info, especially near cliffs.
NorthCrab (2023-01-08 07:42:49+00:00): Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zweryfikowałem twoje zmiany i jak na początki to jest bardzo dobrze :P

Na paczkomatach nie nadawaj nazw, wystarczy sam reference code i nazwa wygeneruje się automatycznie.

Pozdrawiam!
literan (2023-01-08 11:41:26+00:00): вот только не следует просто бросать дорожку в воздухе. Ее надо через общие точки пересекать с другими дорогами, иначе не будет роутинга. Исправлю.
VlPo (2023-01-08 11:51:03+00:00): Не совсем понял о чём речь, но это из-за моей дремучести в топографии. Спасибо за поправку. Однако замечу, что она реально ни с чем не пересекается :)
literan (2023-01-08 11:58:19+00:00): ну вот, смотрите, я концы этого отрезка подсоединил к дорогам
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1128206916
VlPo (2023-01-08 12:03:16+00:00): А, понял - выводить надо до пересечения с "большой" дорогой. Учту.
Вчера у меня были ещё две правки, но уже с реально "велодорожкой". Поправите или самому попытаться?
literan (2023-01-08 14:58:46+00:00): я уже все три куска поправил :)
VlPo (2023-01-08 15:02:07+00:00): Спасибо!
NorthCrab (2023-01-08 08:12:38+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1128064077
Tego typu odcinki chodnika wzdłuż drogi oznaczamy sidewalk, nie footway. Footway nie biegnie wzdłuż drogi.

Pozdrawiam!
sieminsk (2023-01-08 11:19:56+00:00): Oznaczyłem w ten sposób ponieważ ten chodnik jest oddzielony trawnikiem od ulicy i było to spójne z innymi chodnikami po tej samej stronie ul. Nowobielańskiej.

przykładowe zdjęcie na pl wiki zasugerował mi że to tag dla chodnika bezpośrednio przy drodze:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:footway%3Dsidewalk

czy dodając brakujący chodnik powinienem też wyedytować resztę wzdłuż tej ulicy ?
NorthCrab (2023-01-08 11:25:09+00:00): To co mówisz jest uzasadnione jednakże w dużym % przypadków sidewalk jest oznaczany jeśli biegnie on w tym samym kierunku co droga. Bo jeśli nie ma oznaczonego sidewalk to można dojść do wniosku że sidewalk albo nie został jeszcze wyrysowany albo znajduje się on symbolicznie na tej samej linii co droga. Takie symboliczne mapowanie sidewalk jest bardzo popularne w Niemczech: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/52.51489/13.39115. Jednakże my czegoś takiego raczej nie stosujemy i staramy się wyznaczać sidewalk przy drodze.
NorthCrab (2023-01-08 11:26:00+00:00): Sidewalk to ruch pieszy który idzie w tym samy kierunku co droga, może być oddzielony zielenią, nawet drzewami.
Dodko (2023-01-08 09:00:18+00:00): Netreba do jednej sady zmien dávať rôzne zmeny v troch krajoch.
eumiro (2023-01-08 16:16:35+00:00): Súhlasím, ale toto bolo pomalé túlanie sa pozdĺž celého dlhého vedenia a dopĺňanie chýbajúcich stožiarov, takže pomerne jednoliata sada.
Udarian (2023-01-08 09:25:40+00:00): can you please provide source for this edit as from imagery it seams that the building this commit adds is fictitious.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130994699
jfd553 (2023-09-12 17:36:10+00:00): Hi, I wonder, where did you get the information about electric line voltage?
Dartmouthmapmaker (2023-09-15 13:14:00+00:00): Its the type of power line configuration  used in Quebec
jfd553 (2023-09-15 20:01:03+00:00): Really? I did not know. For lines location, you used the imagery?
Dartmouthmapmaker (2023-09-20 23:36:03+00:00): imagery
jfd553 (2023-09-21 11:57:29+00:00): Cool, I wanted to be sure it was not from personal knowledge and that I was wrong on image interpretation :-)
I'll then change a few segments that seem clearer on new images.
mapperich (2024-06-12 16:55:27+00:00): Hallo parsewski,
hab gerade gemerkt, dass du beim Spätrömisch-frühmittelalterlicher Siedlungshügel (1092138286) die HERIS-ID mit der Objekt-ID verwechselt hast. Ich hab den Fehler korrigiert, wollte dich jedoch darüber in Kenntnis setzen. Wird leider immer wieder falsch gemappt.

Wenn du öfter denkmalgeschützte Objekte mapst, kann ich dir den https://www.openstreetmap.at/checker/ sehr empfehlen. Damit gehts super schnell und einfach.

Lg Lukas
parsewski (2024-06-13 16:55:06+00:00): Hi, danke für den Hinweis. Ich hoff' Ich denk dran wenn ich das nächste mal was bda mäßiges mach.
Zandu (2023-11-16 18:09:55+00:00): Moved tags from ways to relations to reduce overlapping ways.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130995181
tux67 (2023-01-08 09:40:22+00:00): Hi, 
hast du "was" hier bewusst eingesetzt, da dort kein Laden mehr sein wird?
Sonst wäre vielleicht disused treffender.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix#Nicht-Nutzung_und_Verfall
Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130995970
GPSpoker (2023-01-08 12:32:19+00:00): Hi tux,
der Laden wird weiterhin genutzt, allerdings hat der Besitzer gewechselt. Hausnummer 53 hat expandiert und die Räume übernommen. 
Hast Du eine bessere/passende Lösung dafür? Bin immer für Vorschläge offen. Ich hatte der 55 eine Note angeheftet, dass der Laden Albani nun auf 53-55 verteilt ist.
Grüße retour
GPSpoker
tux67 (2023-01-08 12:36:44+00:00): Ah - der Verbesserungsvorschlag war bereits oben für den Fall das da immer noch ein eignes Ladengeschäft ist. 
Dann hatte ich disused:shop statt was:shop genommen. In diesem Fall ist was wohl ok.
GPSpoker (2023-01-08 12:43:13+00:00): Danke Dir für den Vorschlag, dann hatte ich das (mehr zufällig ;-)) schon richtig gemacht. Hättest Du evtl. noch eine Verbesserung, wie man die Expansion besser sichtbar macht? Den Shop doppelt eintragen ist ja keine Lösung, oder?
tux67 (2023-01-08 12:47:47+00:00): den Albani Node könntest du mehr in die Mitte der Häuser rücken und als Adresse 53-55 angeben?
GPSpoker (2023-01-08 12:50:51+00:00): Einverstanden, wenn das so einfach sein soll ;-D
Austrianton (2023-01-10 18:58:28+00:00): Please keep individual edits local
gscholz (2023-01-08 10:29:48+00:00): Hi bora can,
this changeset has destroyed the boundary relations of "Asia Minor" (version 1)  and "Asia Minor" (version 2):

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12519384/history

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12518234/history

I have just fixed this. Please watch out what you are doing.
Guido
user_1566574 (2023-02-05 16:27:10+00:00): Hello !
Concernant https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1128081172/history, je suis dubitatif sur l'usage du nom... Était-ce bien nécessaire ?

Merci pour tes contribs autrement, top !
eggie (2023-01-07 21:53:19+00:00): commentaar moest zijn survey:date verwijderd nvt meer
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-04 18:23:33+00:00): name=Aceros Aluminios y Vidrios
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10313717262

shop=aceros_aluminios_y_vidrios ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop or https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Tag_descriptions_for_key_%22shop%22 fitting? Maybe new value needs to be invented? Maybe this data is wrong and there is no shop here? Maybe it is not a shop but something else?
MapMapper_ (2024-05-07 12:12:59+00:00): "Aceros Aluminios y Vidrios" translates to "Aluminum Steels and Glass." I entered that because it's the name of the store and the materials it sells.
Mammi71 (2023-08-07 20:50:48+00:00): Hallo mnap, darf man in diesen Kleidercontainer neuerdings keine Schuhe mehr einwerfen?
mnap (2023-08-07 21:36:24+00:00): Hallo Mammi71,
warum das Tag für shoes entfernt wurde, kann ich mir auch nicht erklären. StreetComplete hat anscheinend schon öfter bei recycling "unbekannte" Tags einfach entfernt. Kann aber natürlich auch mein Fehler gewesen sein. Habe shoes wieder hinzugefügt. Danke für den Hinweis :)
archpdx (2023-01-12 23:32:05+00:00): Hi,
What is the source for this name change?

Also, it looks like you removed the name from Thorps (https://osm.org/node/154398747) Was this intentional?
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-01-30 13:29:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 131881160 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert. User replaced names without giving any source for that change.
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-01-30 13:29:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 131881160 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert. User replaced names without giving any source for that change.
SherbetS (2023-01-25 21:42:27+00:00): Hi CoolJoe2022,

Why have you changed the name of this object? Are you from this area?
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-01-30 13:29:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 131881160 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert. User replaced names without giving any source for that change.
calli3756 (2023-01-08 08:00:23+00:00): Hallo, danke für die edits.
Der Weg nördlich vom BG Klinikum und die Verbindung zum Dickelsbachergrund mit dem neuen Tor. Sicher das der zurück gebaut wurde? 
Danke und schönen Gruß
Pond-Diver (2023-01-08 12:10:06+00:00): Moin,
ich bin mir da ziemlich sicher das da kein Weg abgeht bzw. er verwachsen ist und nicht sichtbar ist.
Ich werde die Tage sicherheitshalber nochmal vorbei fahren.
Danke für den Kommentar.
calli3756 (2023-01-08 19:08:30+00:00): Danke für den Check, die Verbindung wurde erst diesen Sommer eingerichtet, das Tor ist allerdings verschlossen.
Pond-Diver (2023-01-08 19:12:25+00:00): Tatsächlich ist das Tor da, werde es wieder Einpflegen, SORRY! Der Weg dahinter geht noch weiter nach rechts im Kreis. Ist nur sehr "baufällig".
Pond-Diver (2023-01-08 19:42:43+00:00): Korrektur und Erweiterung sind jetzt drin. Sorry nochmal!
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-01-30 13:28:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 131881160 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert. User replaced names without giving any source for that change.
eggie (2023-01-08 07:28:28+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback. Het is niet nodig om adressen toe te voegen.
Ze zijn al aanwezig middels import.
Het adres heb ik weer verwijderd en het originele even uit het stapeltje apart gehaald. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
lankapuhelin (2025-04-22 10:23:14+00:00): Based on what?
la4de (2025-04-26 03:47:18+00:00): Good question.

Based on name. "Laavu" in Finnish means "lean-to".
Sakari_N (2025-05-18 15:49:31+00:00): Just quickly looking at Sorolan montun kotalaavu (9010969670) doesn't appear to be a lean_to, since it appears to have a  fireplace. 

Also Valkama laavu (3790336434) is destroyed based on the description tag on the object. 


https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct
rarad74 (2023-01-08 08:22:46+00:00): Te rog nu mai crea apartamente cu maps.me. si cu atat mai mult nu in mijlocul drumului. You cannot add housenumbers or bloc numbers with maps.me. You must use an web openstreetmap editor.
Tetryk (2023-01-08 13:38:02+00:00): Przystanek nie istnieje i nigdy nie istniał, żaden pieszy nie ma i nie miał tam dojścia. Kiedyś tutaj niektóre tramwaje kończyły trasę i zawracały na drugi tor. Motorniczy nie miał prawa otworzyć drzwi. Usuwam.
eggie (2023-01-08 07:43:30+00:00): Dag Merijn..   Wanneer hier een bord fietspad staat hoef je geen bicycle en foot=designated toe te voegen.
Is het wel een fietspad?  Staat er geen bord dan is het een highway=path
Ik heb er path van gemaakt met foot en bicycle=yes

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-01-08 07:46:27+00:00): Het bruggetje heb ik ook routeerbaar gemaakt voor fietsers.
eggie (2023-01-08 07:56:22+00:00): Laat wel even weten als er toch een bord fietspad is gekomen. .. dan pas ik mijn wijziging weer aan. 
Mapse
eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:02:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:05:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:08:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:02:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:09:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:04:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:03:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:05:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:02:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
Allison P (2025-04-22 15:59:48+00:00): Please take a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1128089635

It is a very unusual shape. From aerial it looks like it is actually five attached shops
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:05:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
MCXDIHJQCP (2023-01-07 22:54:59+00:00): Gracias
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:06:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:08:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:04:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:10:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:02:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:08:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:09:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:08:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:02:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:08:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:10:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
Woazboat (2023-01-25 20:28:31+00:00): Hi, you are changing a lot of place names across the US but you didn't provide a source for these changes. 
What's the basis for these edits?

Regards, Woazboat
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-01-30 13:29:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 131881160 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert. User replaced names without giving any source for that change.
Fizzie-DWG (2024-02-10 22:44:44+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15694 & https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15695
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:04:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:04:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:03:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:07:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:06:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:04:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
LudovicG (2025-12-19 05:51:34+00:00): Bonjour,
Pourquoi ce "not:operator:wikidata" sur la post_box ? Ce n'est pas La Poste qui gère cette post_box ?
t0n3t (2025-12-20 22:07:50+00:00): Bonsoir,
je ne sais pas comment ça est arrivé, mais je constate que sur la boite à lettres (node/5373121304) l'opérateur est toujours ok. S'il s'agit d'une autre boite, je ne suis pas capable de la localiser, désolé. :-(
LudovicG (2025-12-24 12:04:36+00:00): Bonjour,
Merci pour votre retour. Si je comprends bien cela ne vous gêne pas vraiment :)
Est-ce que cela vous convient si je remplace le "not:operator:wikidata=Q373724" par "operator:wikidata=Q373724" ?
t0n3t (2025-12-24 16:05:10+00:00): C'est juste que je ne comprends pas pourquoi il y a ce "not:" sur le wikidata de l'opérateur, je ne maîtrise pas trop osm. Sur le node je vois les infos apparaitre, malgré tout, comme il faut. Je fais l'édit que vous proposez. Il s'agit d'une édition initialement faite depuis l'App streetcomplete, a mon avis c'est l'App qui avait rajouté cette variable...
LudovicG (2025-12-27 08:59:47+00:00): Ok, merci pour votre retour et votre action.
Tyler Brown Cifu Shuster (2023-01-07 23:36:57+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Shasta_County,_California
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:03:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:10:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:03:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.