piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-10 10:30:57+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12600686959/history has shop = sweet store that was added in this edit
shop=sweet store ? What kind of shop, if any is here?

is it shop=confectionery ? or is something else matching?

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=confectionery
Fizzie-DWG (2025-03-13 23:42:41+00:00): Reverted by DWG - poor quality & lack of HOT response

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163592479
Piskvor (2025-02-19 14:52:11+00:00): Dobrý den,

bylo by možné doplnit i typ knihobudky? ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:public_bookcase:type )

S pozdravem,
Piškvor
Yurii Skvortsov (2025-02-19 19:11:21+00:00): Dobrý den, děkuji za zprávu, ale teď podle pravidel OSM není možné přidat typ. 
S pozdravem , Yurii
Piskvor (2025-02-19 19:20:57+00:00): Dobrý den, asi nerozumím. Proč by to nebylo možné? Nevím o pravidlu, které by to zakazovalo.

S pozdravem 
Piškvor
Yurii Skvortsov (2025-02-19 20:35:01+00:00): Spletl jsem pravidla, a teď kouknul jsem znovu do OSM pravidel. Přidal jsem typ knihobudky , a dekuju moc za pozornost.

S pozdravem, 
Yurii
Piskvor (2025-02-19 21:34:33+00:00): Super, díky moc. Já nechci nikoho úkolovat - ale když už jste tam byl, říkal jsem si, že budete vědět podrobnosti.

Vidím Vaše časté úpravy v okolí Prahy a vážím si Vaší péče o mapu. Děkuji,
Piškvor
NeisBot (2025-02-19 13:33:43+00:00): Hello, thank you for your contribution!

I noticed that some of the tags and descriptions you've used appear to be related to #SEO #spam. I recommend reading the following page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Spam

Could you please confirm if your map edits here were intentional?

#MapWithoutSpam #TagSmartNotSpam
NeisReview (2025-03-13 08:39:00+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/162778543
NeisBot (2025-02-19 13:39:38+00:00): Hello, thank you for your contribution!

I noticed that some of the tags and descriptions you've used appear to be related to #SEO #spam. I recommend reading the following page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Spam

Could you please confirm if your map edits here were intentional?

#MapWithoutSpam #TagSmartNotSpam
NeisRevert (2025-03-13 08:47:43+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/163560129
silversurfer83 (2025-02-19 20:05:32+00:00): Moin Marius,

ist das wirklich der Name des Kunstwerks oder ist das eher eine Beschreibung?

Guck mal bitte ob
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen
das so hergibt.
Andernfalls bitte einfach den Text in das Feld "description" verschieben. Danke
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162701529
5m4u9 (2025-02-19 17:01:57+00:00): Hola bienvenid@! Gracias por editar y mejorar el mapa en Bolivia.

Editaste una avenida importante en la zona, pero ya estaba clasificada como importante.

Seguramente vos querías "hacerla" más importante, pero la importancia de los caminos para Bolivia está dada por la importancia que une un punto y otro.

Revisando un poco la zona, lo mejor sería cambiar a "color amarillo" en importancia desde av. santos dumont a palmar del oratorio y unirla a avenida paurito y el quior...  si otra avenida es importante, me dices para corregir.
nevw (2025-02-21 03:27:55+00:00): Hi
small osmi problem here
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=152.93959&lat=-27.54632&zoom=17
Andrea Musuruane (2025-02-25 15:56:28+00:00): Ciao. Ho sistemato l'incrocio. La classificazione delle strade non era coerente con il resto della rete. Le relazioni che erano state rotte rimuovendo l'incrocio non erano state ripristinate. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162702147
eggie (2025-02-19 16:19:03+00:00): Beste Purrie  In OSM taggen we bij op de adresnodes. Dus niet op de gebouwomtrekken. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-02-19 16:20:14+00:00): Veel staat al op de adresnodes en dan  voeg je nog een keer hetzelfde toe.
Bv de Spar.
Dat geeft verwarring en vervuilt de data.
eggie (2025-02-19 16:24:55+00:00): Loop je tags na voordat je verder maps, want het veel werk voor mappers om alles te verbeteren. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-02-19 16:37:57+00:00): Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=162702184

Spar en autobedrijf al aangepast
Lucas Härtel (2025-02-19 14:00:14+00:00): interessante
eggie (2025-02-19 16:17:23+00:00): Tip   Geef concreet aan wat je hebt gedaan. Various changes  ??? Beter niet met de kaart schuiven in editmodus. Dat geeft vaak schade.

MVG
eggie
bxl-forever (2025-02-19 14:42:51+00:00): Hello,

If you want to update data in Łódź and in Paris, it is strongly recommended to upload them separately.  This would avoid that your changes show up as a giant box spreading across 9 European countries.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Writing correct changeset comments instead of naming all of your changes "Updates" is also wanted.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

It looks like some changes were made by clicking on suggested tag upgrades in the iD editor (aka the "name suggestion index") for a lot of places in an area, along with changes that may come from your own surveys (like https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9381852823/history for a parcel box).

Would you please be so kind as to explain what you were wanting to do here.

Thanks in advance.
PharmaWP (2025-02-19 15:33:11+00:00): I understand your comments and will take them into account in my future contributions, thanks.

All the changes made were suggested by the "warning tool" (sorry, I don't know how it's called), even the edit you mentionned on the parcel locker.

Globally, I updated obsolete attributes or added some like healthcare, brand/operator name/Wikidata, as the tool suggested.
I tried to keep a critical mind on what I was doing and didn't make some changes that need field check (I'm not from Poland!).

These are my first edits on OSM so I try to keep it simple to understand how it all works, step by step.
silversurfer83 (2025-02-19 20:41:54+00:00): Hi there :)

nice work you do.

One small hint regarding
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1361165941

check https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:athletics%3Dlong_jump and maybe revisit the jump pits

happy mapping
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162703694
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-18 03:06:37+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165094267
eggie (2025-02-19 15:59:30+00:00): Hoi.... Nee.. dit is niet correct. area=yes (is niets.. gebruik je icm met andere tags om een vlak te maken) als vlak met layer 1 heb ik verwijderd.
De naam staat al op de node.

Groet
eggie
eggie (2025-02-19 16:01:24+00:00): Niet alles rendert op de standaardkaart.
Evt zou je de naam op het gebouw kunnen zetten en daar het pompstation van kunnen maken. 
Het gebouw is immers het pompstation en niet de adresnode.
huxbie (2025-02-19 17:08:52+00:00): hmm, okay. Maar nu is het net of het hele grasveld voor iedereen toegankelijk is! Terwijl er een hek omheen staat, alleen aan de dijk is er een stukje openbaar gras.
Bedankt voor de follow up iig.
ciao
eggie (2025-02-19 17:35:20+00:00): Geen probleem. We zetten vlakken landuse  niet op slot. 
Wel de wegen. Een vlak routeert niet.
Uitgezonderd weer militaire terreinen.. haven  en marine oefengebieden. (Openseamap)
Je kunt er wel een hek omheen zetten met barrier=fence

Gr eggie
eggie (2025-02-19 17:37:42+00:00): Nog wat uitzonderingen die op private kunnen als vlak zijn bv privezwembaden parkeerterreinen.. tuinen.

Het is een hoop abacadabra.
huxbie (2025-02-20 08:04:09+00:00): Haha, zeg dat!
Iets zegt me dat het logischer is zoals bij Evides; Area = Evides Waterbedrijf en de node = (industrial) building.
Maar goed, in ieder geval niet private ;)
Zoals gebruikelijk, bedankt eggie!
eggie (2025-02-22 12:59:35+00:00): Hoi Hubert..

Ben nog even langs gefietst. Had immers bicycle=use_sidepath verwijderd.
Dat klopte niet meer toen het fietspad was verwijderd.
Je mag inderdaad nog gewoon op de dijk fietsen.. ook al suggereert het benedendijkse fietspad wat anders.
Bij de sportvelden is sinds kort ook nog een piepklein stukje fietspad bijgekomen.
Het klopt weer zo.
Groet..
eggie
eggie (2025-02-19 16:06:56+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  Alleen het laatste stukje naar de weg is oneway=no  Ik heb het weer aangepast.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
ilias_ (2025-03-06 05:51:48+00:00): Hi mona_magdy,

According to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction=roundabout

junction=roundabout should only be used when the roundabout has right of way and is free of all stop signs. However here, there are 2 stop signs. If you come from one of the sides that have a stop sign, you still have to stop, even in the middle of the roundabout (very stupid...). So the tag should be removed. Maybe one day they'll finally add yield signs and it'll become an actual roundabout. Thank you!
mona_magdy (2025-03-09 11:51:29+00:00): Hello, ilias;
Thank you for your contribution to improving OpenStreetMap, and by reviewing the Wiki pages I found that your point of view is correct and the most appropriate tag is "junction=circular"
(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Dcircular)
thank you for sharing your knowledge with us.
Regards
mona_magdy
NorthCrab_upload (2025-02-19 15:01:01+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1361172776

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-19 15:19:47+00:00): Sockenpuppe
Taya_S (2025-02-19 15:22:59+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162705643
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-07 23:58:51+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164656191
InsertUser (2025-02-20 17:42:06+00:00): Why?
OliveraM (2025-02-21 07:26:13+00:00): Sorry, I overlooked it.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-02-19 15:31:55+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9210261730
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1361175715

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Hubert Gonera (2025-02-19 15:51:33+00:00): @NorthCrab_upload
Witam.
Dziękuję za pomoc, jestem początkujący jeżeli chodzi o mapowanie.

Poprawiłem zduplikowany adres.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162706924

Pozdrawiam, Hubert
ilias_ (2025-02-19 18:42:09+00:00): Merci de mettre un commentaire qui résume vos changements!
Grass-snake (2025-02-20 21:15:38+00:00): Здравствуйте, у Вас есть разрешение на копирование из Яндекса и 2ГИС?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%B2%D1%8B%D0%B5_%D0%92%D0%BE%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%8B_%D0%B8_%D0%9E%D1%82%D0%B2%D0%B5%D1%82%D1%8B#%D0%9C%D0%BE%D0%B3%D1%83_%D0%BB%D0%B8_%D1%8F_%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%BF%D0%B8%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%8C_%D0%B4%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8B%D0%B5_%D0%B8%D0%B7_Google_Maps/%D0%AF%D0%BD%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%81.%D0%9A%D0%B0%D1%80%D1%82...?
mariotomo (2025-02-24 06:44:50+00:00): hola. quizás quiera revisar la edición.
cambió una calle de acceso privado y la convirtión en una cerca de alambre de pujas.
sykul (2025-02-19 18:28:23+00:00): Bonjour, et merci pour votre contribution.

Il semble que vous ayez ajouté des informations utiles. Juste quelques remarques pour la prochaine fois :

 1.  Vous avez accidentellement transformé le bâtiment en cercle. Dans iD, cela arrive généralement si vous appuyez sur la touche « o ».
  2.  Vous avez ajouté un nom à certains des nœuds composant le bâtiment, mais il suffit que le nom apparaisse une seule fois sur l’objet.
 3.   Ce point est moins urgent, mais sauf si le numéro sur la porte est écrit « 08 », on note généralement le numéro de maison simplement comme « 8 ».

N’hésitez pas à me demander si vous avez besoin d’aide pour corriger ces points.
Patchanka (2025-03-15 15:24:13+00:00): Bonjour
je viens de corriger le problème de géométrie et les attributs.
Bonne journée
ilias_ (2025-02-19 17:42:57+00:00): Pour le nom arabe, il ne faut pas supprimer le nom et le remplacer, mais le rajouter à côté du nom français, et également le rajouter dans name:ar
NeisBot (2025-02-19 17:02:56+00:00): Hi CLAUDIO DANIEL SALCEDO, and thank you for your contributions to the OSM project!

I noticed that over the past few hours, you've created several changesets with comments that may be unclear or hard to understand.

For collaboration within the OSM community, it’s helpful to provide comments that explain the changes you’ve made. This helps others follow your work more easily. You can find some useful tips for writing clear and effective changeset comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Thanks for your attention to this.

PS: I’ve also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#ClearComments
eggie (2025-02-19 16:34:41+00:00): Dag HJ  Wanneer dit nu een parkeerplaats betreft dan is het Oke. Je edit gebied is zo groot geworden omdat je een grens (on)bewust hebt verschoven.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=162706598

MVG
eggie
HJS_Holten (2025-02-19 16:50:27+00:00): Dank Eggie,

Ja heb de leaftype=mixed iets verschoven. Die loopt/liep over de nieuwe P-plaats. Vond ik niet logisch en verschoven iets naast de P-plaats.
Is event. nog te herstellen als dit niet had gemogen?

Groep
Henk Stoevenbelt/Holten
eggie (2025-02-19 16:58:45+00:00): Hoi.. Nee ... dat hoeft niet.
Bij die administratieve grenzen, gemeenten provincies ligt het anders. Die worden  'bewaakt'.
Groet
eggie
NeisBot (2025-02-19 17:02:50+00:00): Hi Matias Blanco, and thank you for your contributions to the OSM project!

I noticed that over the past few hours, you've created several changesets with comments that may be unclear or hard to understand.

For collaboration within the OSM community, it’s helpful to provide comments that explain the changes you’ve made. This helps others follow your work more easily. You can find some useful tips for writing clear and effective changeset comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Thanks for your attention to this.

PS: I’ve also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#ClearComments
Fizzie-DWG (2025-03-11 05:08:12+00:00): Reverted by DWG for poor quality

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163468889
Gregory Peony (2025-04-14 21:52:55+00:00): The residential area I flagged does not contain enough buildings to be a residential area. Highways should not share nodes with landuse areas. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162706734
limes11 (2025-02-20 09:25:45+00:00): Moin

das cycleway=separate müsste dann auch noch weg, oder ?

VG
Adrian β (2025-02-20 09:53:13+00:00): Moin,

ja, das kann wohl auch weg. 
Habs mal sofort erledigt (cs 162732733).
Danke für den Hinweis :)

Freundliche Grüße
NeisBot (2025-02-19 17:02:36+00:00): Hi goppizzi, and thank you for your contributions to the OSM project!

I noticed that over the past few hours, you've created several changesets with comments that may be unclear or hard to understand.

For collaboration within the OSM community, it’s helpful to provide comments that explain the changes you’ve made. This helps others follow your work more easily. You can find some useful tips for writing clear and effective changeset comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Thanks for your attention to this.

PS: I’ve also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#ClearComments
NeisBot (2025-02-19 17:02:32+00:00): Hi astrid ocampo, and thank you for your contributions to the OSM project!

I noticed that over the past few hours, you've created several changesets with comments that may be unclear or hard to understand.

For collaboration within the OSM community, it’s helpful to provide comments that explain the changes you’ve made. This helps others follow your work more easily. You can find some useful tips for writing clear and effective changeset comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Thanks for your attention to this.

PS: I’ve also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#ClearComments
SerchoHJ (2025-02-20 11:53:41+00:00): Obras iniciadas desde julio de 2024 https://www.eldiasoria.es/noticia/zbc7ded74-caf9-2637-263200c5d96bb9b7/202407/primeras-obras-de-la-a-15-entre-fuensauco-y-villar-del-campo

Actualización del estado de las obras en diciembre de 2024 https://sorianoticias.com/noticia/2024-12-11-a-buen-ritmo-las-obras-de-la-a-15-entre-fuensauco-y-villar-del-campo-116395
jeslop (2025-02-20 13:30:28+00:00): Disculpas serchohj, estaba revisando los cambios de otro usuario que puso varias autovías como en construcción y me he llevado estas por delante. Revierto el cambio y lo dejo como estaba. Lo cierto es que en la imagen de PNOA no se ve nada, en estos casos un enlace a las actualizaciones en prensa siempre viene bien.

Saludos y gracias.
jeslop (2025-02-20 13:31:58+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162741470
nilloc29 (2026-04-11 10:36:16+00:00): I saw that this is private land. Are these trails that are legally open to the public? I live in the area and can take a look but am curious if you know.
ScrawnyMeowth1 (2026-04-11 13:18:40+00:00): Honestly I have no idea. I don't live in Wenatchee but I hiked some of these trails while visiting once, and I didn't notice any No Trespassing signs. Based on that and the fact that they're noticable on Strava, I would assume they're open to the public. But again I'm not from the area so I'm definitely not an authoritative source. Feel free to do your own research.
skyper (2025-02-19 20:46:48+00:00): Hi santioviedo08,
I am sorry but I do not speak Spanish.
Please, do not add `landuse=*` to boundary relations or nodes with `place=*`. If you want to define the landuse that is fine but please use an object on its own for that.

Thanks and cheers,
skyper
Mannivu (2025-02-19 19:18:22+00:00): Sicuro di questa modifica? Il passaggio a livello è dismesso dal 1 gennaio
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162707288
Mannivu (2025-02-24 16:01:06+00:00): Annullato in quanto il passaggio livello è stato chiuso e dismesso il 31/12/2024

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162899055
ToniHaralović (2025-02-21 09:48:01+00:00): Reverted because of accidental node creation #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162772249
NeisBot (2025-02-19 17:02:11+00:00): Hi MarianoFernandez, and thank you for your contributions to the OSM project!

I noticed that over the past few hours, you've created several changesets with comments that may be unclear or hard to understand.

For collaboration within the OSM community, it’s helpful to provide comments that explain the changes you’ve made. This helps others follow your work more easily. You can find some useful tips for writing clear and effective changeset comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Thanks for your attention to this.

PS: I’ve also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#ClearComments
Gleb_Artyomenko (2025-02-20 10:32:31+00:00): clarification: road name was added based on 
Bing Maps Aerial
 #mapbox_linters
Gleb_Artyomenko (2025-03-18 08:44:42+00:00): clarification: road name was added based on Bing Maps Aerial #mapbox_linters
Taya_S (2025-02-19 16:31:05+00:00): Reverted SEO vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162708688
tux67 (2025-02-19 16:21:12+00:00): Hallo tuennes,
da dieses Schild https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=956788832258017&focus=photo
ist access=no nicht richtig hier.
https://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/?signs=260,1026-36
Tagging ist angepasst.
Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162707752
tuennes (2025-02-19 16:39:58+00:00): Hallo tux67,

Danke!
ich werde mich noch etwas besser einlesen.

Gruß,
tuennes
Edelsalami (2025-05-09 11:43:58+00:00): Hallo heini93, eine Anmerkung zum Grenzverlauf der Stadtteile: die von der Stadt Wuppertal bereitgestellten Geodaten erscheinen mir stark generalisiert und damit ungenau. Der tatsächliche Grenzverlauf ist ALKIS (aka NRW Liegenschaftskataster) zu entnehmen. Die Grenzen in ALKIS unterscheidet sich doch deutlich von den aktuell gemappten Grenzen. Gruß
Gleb_Artyomenko (2025-02-19 16:22:50+00:00): clarification: oneway direction was changed based on PNOA Spain and Bing Streetside #mapbox_roads_attributes
Harald Hartmann (2025-02-20 17:13:08+00:00): Hallo HuetteimWald, vielen Dank für deinen ersten Beitrag in der Gemeinde Schleusegrund. Eine Anmerkung gibt es von mir: der hinzugefügte Pfad hat definitiv keinen Namen "Kleiner Pfad". Bitte lösche dieses Attribut wieder raus. Viele Grüße, Harald Hartmann
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-02 10:18:28+00:00): Hello!

You used
tunnel=building-passage
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/564717686/history

Have you maybe meant
tunnel=building_passage
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
pwbriggs (2025-12-03 01:59:43+00:00): Fixed, good catch! I think this is correct for a carwash?

Happy mapping!
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-03 08:05:29+00:00): yes, I am pretty sure it is

have a nice day!
NeatNit (2025-02-19 20:11:03+00:00): Hi, thanks for the name fix, unfortunately my bot gtfs2osm will keep reverting the name to the wrong value. I will try to contact the ministry of transportation to get it fixed in their data.

If you spot wrong names on bus stops in the future, please leave a comment on the latest changeset by gtfs2osm-il. I will get an email about it and I'll deal with it. Thanks!

More info about the bot: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Gtfs2osm
Tsur Halamish (2025-02-19 20:22:34+00:00): 🤪
NeatNit (2025-02-20 23:59:38+00:00): Great news - they've fixed it now after I emailed them :)
Tsur Halamish (2025-02-21 05:23:14+00:00): תודה על הטיפול. סחטיין.
NeatNit (2025-02-24 11:08:55+00:00): סתם שתדע, בזכות המקרה הזה הוספתי קוד שמיידע אותי כשאנשים מנסים לשנות שמות של תחנות, ככה שבעתיד יש יותר סיכוי שאשים לב למקרים כאלה ואוכל להגיב :)
Tsur Halamish (2025-02-24 16:56:35+00:00): 👍💪
IrynaStaradub (2025-02-19 16:30:42+00:00): Also fixed geometry of roads according to National Agriculture Imagery Program
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-18 03:06:38+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165094267
yrtimiD (2025-02-20 21:21:29+00:00): This political border change didn't provide any official source and was reverted.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162757711
yrtimiD (2025-02-22 23:25:58+00:00): the edit was restored in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162834785