piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Szymson (2026-04-04 08:41:31+00:00): "zmiana" to nie jest stosowny opis zestawu zmian - zapraszam do lektury: osm.wiki/Pl:Dobre_praktyki
Szymson (2026-04-04 08:41:22+00:00): "zmiana" to nie jest stosowny opis zestawu zmian - zapraszam do lektury: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_praktyki
GiovanniPen (2026-04-04 09:30:07+00:00): here the same, i think that (at least some of) the bike parking (racks) are still on the ground. so instead of removing the node i think you should put "disused:" before the amenity key and specify properly the rest
Unknown Registered User (2026-04-09 16:59:57+00:00): hi, according to first party sources, the ones that I have deleted are mostly planned to be activated in the future, so I supposed that there was nothing at the moment, I agree that if there are actual docking stations at the moment those should be mapped, preferably with the new CTGO name tag, and as disused.
I'm not able to revert a deleted node, so could you do it or should I just add new nodes (which I know is not ideal)
GiovanniPen (2026-04-10 14:07:05+00:00): sorry if i ask but what is your source of information? and why would you suppose if some are "planned" to remove them? the docking station exists since the previous sharing method (that is now changing) but most of them are still on the ground. 

you can use https://revert.monicz.dev/ to revert the deleted node ;)
Unknown Registered User (2026-04-11 11:41:26+00:00): I gathered info from combining what's provided on a map on amts.ct.it, a different one on ctgo.it, and a brochure and compared it with what was already on OSM marked as Amigo and on Google Street Map. I admit that even on the official sources there were various discrepancies.
I realize I should have not deleted some of them :)
GiovanniPen (2026-04-13 07:58:37+00:00): can you fix what mentioned above? you can use the tool i've linked to revert (only) part of the changeset
GiovanniPen (2026-04-21 12:28:39+00:00): still waiting for the revert
GiovanniPen (2026-05-02 07:40:50+00:00): hello?
OlasMapy (2026-04-06 14:01:37+00:00): A czy transliteracja rosyjskiej nazwy (po 2wś używana krócej niż Rauschen) to naprawdę polska nazwa?
Yunkers (2026-04-07 08:15:23+00:00): Tak
OlasMapy (2026-04-08 13:26:45+00:00): Jeżeli Ruszowice/Ruskowo to nie poprawna nazwa to to miasto nie ma polskiej nazwy. Swietłogorsk to rosyjska nazwa.
Yunkers (2026-04-08 21:37:45+00:00): Nie wiedziałem że w rosyjskim używa się łacińskich liter.
Pan nie masz pojęcia o tym pan piszesz, więc proszę nazw nie ruszać.
OlasMapy (2026-04-10 08:04:05+00:00): Dobrym przykładem jest to, że jedno miasto na początku nazywało się Władimirowka, później Tojohara a teraz Jużno Sachalińsk. A dlaczego? Bo miasto nie miało polskiej nazwy.
Pikse (2026-04-11 08:54:02+00:00): Please don't restart discussion on exactly the same matter that was already discussed under https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179825956 (as well as in Discourse discussion referred over there). This is disrespectful to other users. Your question was already answered.
Yunkers (2026-04-11 21:56:29+00:00): Nie mam pojęcia w jaki sposób twój argument odnosi się do czegokolwiek.
eggie (2026-04-04 09:42:01+00:00): Dag Tazi,

In ieder geval geen supermarkt. Evt shop=farm ?
Of als vending_machine taggen.

Mvg,
eggie
eggie (2026-04-04 10:11:46+00:00): aangepast naar shop=farm
Tazi0 (2026-04-04 19:10:21+00:00): Dat klinkt idd wat logischer!
iandees (2026-04-04 12:33:38+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6403351999 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180851451, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-01 02:19:14+00:00): Removed SEO spam description=* from POI and fixed beauty=* tagging in changeset 183474164

https://osm.org/changeset/183474164
silversurfer83 (2026-04-06 09:12:22+00:00): Hi :)

access=yes impliziert, dass jede*r jederzeit das ganze Gelände betreten darf. Passt das? 

area=yes ist eher überflüssig.

historic=monastery ist spezifischer als historic=yes und sollte so bleiben. Es ist ja auch ein end_date=* angegeben und damit relativ klar, dass das Kloster nicht mehr als Kloster in Betrieb ist.

Bei Fragen immer raus damit

silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180845683
mimikryo (2026-04-07 07:39:40+00:00): Access=yes 
Ja, dies ist so. Es sieht auf den ersten Blick nicht aus, doch ist es eine öffentliche Anlage auf Grund der Historie. Da es als psychatrischer Wohngruppenbereich genutzt wird, sollte respektvoll begangen werden. 
Hierfür habe ich im übrigen noch keinen passenden Tag gefunden, nur Orphans, underprivileged.... Hast du hierfür eine Idee?
historic=yes paßt beides nicht ganz genau. da es so viele Ebenen hat, Kloster, Kirche, "Jugendfürsorge", KZ und AEL, sowie Mädchenerziehungsanstalt, heutige Nutzung der Vitos, die das Kloster stark überformt haben in der ERscheinung, frage ich mich, was mehr passend sein könnte und Interessierte besser informiert.  hast du eine Idee? 
Danke für deine Hinweise!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180845683
Nzau (2026-04-21 20:04:50+00:00): Salut cwrff,
Pourquoi avoir modifié le type de chemin ? 
highway=path correspond pour une voie verte. Tu as remplacé par highway=cyclement (piste cyclable) : cela exclut les piétons :/

Au plaisir d'en discuter,
Enzo
cwrff (2026-04-22 08:01:02+00:00): Bonjour Enzo,
Je suis la définition de "path" dans le wiki : "highway=path est utilisé pour indiquer un sentier générique, à usage multiple ou non spécifié, trop étroite pour le passage d'un véhicule à 4 roues (motorisés ou non), indépendamment du type de revêtement au sol". 
Par ailleurs, dans le wiki "highway=cycleway", on précise bien que "path" n'indique pas que la voie est accessible aux cyclistes.
Je prends bien soin de rajouter "foot=yes" et "segregated=no".
Nzau (2026-04-22 08:09:50+00:00): Merci pour ton retour. 

Légalement, une voie verte n'est pas une piste cyclable sur laquelle les piétons sont autorisés (une PC est réservée aux vélos). Ou inversement, un chemin piéton sur lequel les vélos sont autorisés.

Pour la cartographie des aménagements cyclables, le mieux est de suivre cette page : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bicycle
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bicycle#Voie_verte

En France, on utilise donc highway=path + bicycle=designated + foot=designated 

Pense également à regarder l'historique des objets que tu modifies, bien souvent ils sont déjà correctement cartographiés ^^
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/318450014/history

Bonne journée,
Enzo
cwrff (2026-04-23 06:48:13+00:00): N'étant pas cycliste, je n'avais pas vu ces wikis. Souvent d'anciennes voies ferrées, ces voies vertes sont sablées ou bitumées sur plusieurs mètres de large, et utilisées par les véhicules de service. Cela contredit la définition du "highway=path", et la signification habituelle du mot "sentier". Je propose de poursuivre le débat sur le forum Plein Air. Merci d'attendre quelques jours avant de tout remettre "comme avant".
Nzau (2026-04-23 07:10:41+00:00): "utilisées par les véhicules de service." Je suis bien d'accord avec cela. Néanmoins, ce n'est pas leur fonction première, peut-être un véhicule pour 100 voir 500 vélos / piétons. 

De quel forum parles-tu ? 
Le seul que je connais est celui-ci : https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/

Et le sujet a déjà récemment été traité : https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/une-piste-cyclable-nest-pas-un-sentier/26366

Je pense qu'il faut simplement comprendre que "path" manque d'option, que ce soit pour décrire les sentiers ou les voies mixtes piétons-vélos. Une utilisation commune et partagée de cette valeur semble donc nécessaire, dans l'attente de meilleure solution.
Voir les sujets qui proposent de nouvelles options : https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/request-for-comments-solution-proposal-for-the-path-issues/122660
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/documenting-solution-proposals-for-highway-path/119773
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/lets-talk-about-highway-classification-in-osm/136125

Actuellement, les calculateurs d'itinéraires, la Base Nationale des Aménagements Cyclables, etc. utilisent la combinaison citée plus haut pour calculer les voies vertes ou autres chemins mixtes.
Si tu souhaites changer cela, il y a du travail ^^
cwrff (2026-04-25 12:47:54+00:00): Merci pour toutes ces infos que je connaissais pas : je ne lisais pas le forum à l'époque. Après mure réflexion, je serais de l'avis de ceux qui proposent : "highway=track" à cause de la largeur (la pratique agricole n'étant pas impérative), avec "bicycle+foot designated". Les voies vertes ressemblent beaucoup à ces grands chemins empierrés créés lors des remembrements, sur lesquels les piétons s'ennuient rapidement... alors qu'on peut suivre un "path" agréablement pendant des heures !
  Je me propose de corriger mes contributions dans ce sens ces jours prochains. Merci pour tes éclairages.
anjoco (2026-04-04 14:34:55+00:00): It makes no sense to those who speak English and are stupid, but not to us French or German Swiss.
anjoco (2026-04-04 14:36:06+00:00): Trump, Trump, Trump 🐒🦧🦍
user_10901495 (2026-04-04 10:13:01+00:00): wrong comment for changeset
meant to write:
changed wrong tag of "suburb" to "neighbourhood" and improved names of POIs
Tomasz Herud (2026-05-19 10:13:59+00:00): Hej, dlaczego drogi z południowego Kopernika oznaczałeś jako mające wszędzie znaki P-27. Przecież ich tam nie ma.
Robak (2026-05-19 16:24:38+00:00): Tej Tomek, testowałem niedawno jedną z aplikacji do wprowadzania danych do OSM. Może coś źle zaznaczyłem. Sprawdzę i poprawię. Dzięki za komentarz.
Tomasz Herud (2026-05-20 06:13:29+00:00): Nadal widzę nadmiarower tagi. Np. ta droga https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/22870122 ma cycleway:both:lane	pictogram
mueschel (2026-04-11 13:38:19+00:00): H,
the tag "bicycle_street" doesn't exist so far. It's either "cyclestreet" or "bicycle_road". Could you check the wiki which one is used in your area?
pbilk (2026-04-14 06:39:53+00:00): Okay, thank you. I will double check that.
mueschel (2026-04-14 07:17:48+00:00): If there is nothing documented, you can check the statistics for Canada: 
https://taginfo.geofabrik.de/north-america:canada/keys/cyclestreet#map
https://taginfo.geofabrik.de/north-america:canada/keys/bicycle_road#overview

bicycle_road is used in more cities, and 20% of cases use both tags in parallel.
pbilk (2026-04-14 07:54:51+00:00): Thank you. bicycle boulevard is more common for Canada but I don't believe that tag exists so "cyclestreet" seems to be the best for now.
silversurfer83 (2026-04-06 09:14:54+00:00): Hi :)

sieht ok aus.

Ein paar Kleinigkeiten, die verbessert werden können: landuse=* (also die Baustellenfläche) nicht mit dem Weg verbinden und bei dem Gebäude im Süde schaut es für mich so aus als wäre das, was du aktuell in name=* hinterlegt hast eher ein Fall für operator=*

Grundsätzlich wäre immer eine Quellenangabe (source) in dem Dialog, wo du auch den Kommentar hinterlässt, ganz nett. 

Happy mapping

silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180847367
mimikryo (2026-04-07 07:40:52+00:00): Danke für deine RM, ich schaue mir das an und nehme die Anregung auf! LG
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180847367
eggie (2026-04-04 11:27:58+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
LordGarySugar (2026-04-05 02:50:43+00:00): Are you manually reviewing these edits? For example here you changed highway=serfice to highway=unclassified
Marcos Dione (2026-04-05 13:50:59+00:00): It was track, then residential, then service. From the aerial it should probably be track.

Yes, I'm doing each one by hand, but sometimes aerial imagery fails here :(
Marcos Dione (2026-04-05 13:52:44+00:00): But you're right, it's back to service, given the value of the others around.
aTarom (2026-04-04 11:47:12+00:00): Hola, el tag
"impassable"
va decreciendo
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/impassable#chronology
quizás se ajusta mejor el tag
"obstacle"
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/obstacle#values
que define la razón de la dificultad de paso?
Saludos
ShyShark (2026-04-04 11:50:19+00:00): Pues es que realmente no sabía cual poner. La verdad es que para el senderista normal es imposible. Era lo que quería reflejar.
aTarom (2026-04-04 11:55:13+00:00): Personalmente me decantaría por
obstacle=vegetation
cuando es un sendero sin uso en el que no se puede pasar si no es con herramientas de corte
ShyShark (2026-04-04 11:59:55+00:00): Es que es complicado porque hay que ir subiendo por roca... No es el problema la vegetación. No voy a decirlo con convicción porque no escalo... pero casi parece tema de escalar, jajaja.
dodelinho (2026-04-16 11:44:49+00:00): AFAIK,  only the sections east of Mangaliei became two way. Did you check in the field or do you have other info?
ctrl-alt-k (2026-04-16 11:49:07+00:00): Ah, no, I just read an article saying they were going to be modified. If it's just the bits east of Mangaliei feel free to edit it back!
NeisBot (2026-04-04 11:30:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13634946991 v5

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Auto body shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisAgent (2026-04-04 16:33:31+00:00): 🕵 The changeset tags appear to reference Google as a data source.

Please note that using Google Maps, Google Street View, or similar Google services as a mapping source is not allowed in OpenStreetMap due to license restrictions.

More information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google

If the data in this changeset was derived from Google or another incompatible source, the edits may need to be reverted.

If this is a misunderstanding and the data was collected from permitted sources (e.g. local survey, Bing imagery, local knowledge, etc.), please clarify in a reply.
eggie (2026-04-04 14:12:19+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback   De info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
evo_evz (2026-04-07 10:34:57+00:00): Hey why did you change this back to a turning circle? It's not a turning circle. Thanks
Mavvie (2026-04-08 01:19:02+00:00): It's a place to turn around. While it's a hammer style and not a circular style, it's still a turning circle.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:turning_circle says: "a bit of road made for turning around, and is not strictly circular."
evo_evz (2026-04-23 14:18:55+00:00): Ok well I guess if there is no provision to differentiate then best to keep it as turning circle.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-15 10:31:20+00:00): Removed SEO tags (possibly added from Google Maps) advertising an offshore fishing charter company "Findiction Charters" from a private residential home not near a large body of water, in changeset 184130219

https://osm.org/changeset/184130219
Sébastien Pi (2026-04-05 18:31:14+00:00): Salut,
Ça me dit vaguement quelque chose d’avoir supprimé un dentiste récemment dans le coin (n13705383083). À vérifier peut-être.
captain_slow (2026-06-15 05:51:27+00:00): Ich habe diesen Defi mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184120380 gelöscht, da er ganz offensichtlich an einem komplett falschen Ort eingetragen wurde. Wo dieser Defi tatsächlich eingetragen werden müsste weiss ich leider nicht.
Taksine (2026-06-02 07:32:45+00:00): 现在的一个难点是很多人把ID预设当成标准了，这类问题还要巡查很久
DaveF (2026-04-05 22:33:49+00:00): As the only reason platforms exist is for the public to walk on them a highway=foot is moot.
As you may notice combined with the area tag it causes osm-carto to render it different;ly.
GreenAlex (2026-04-05 23:21:54+00:00): Hey, thanks for the comment.

I'd heard that "area:highway=footway" may be necessary to allow routing across train platforms. As there was an area tag already I thought "highway=footway" may be the only necessary thing.

It resolved the routable paths issues as well, so I took that as a good sign that adding the tag was helping.

Is this incorrect? Is the standard here to leave the current set of tags?
iandees (2026-04-04 12:33:50+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12208658492 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180851471, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
Supaplex (2026-04-04 17:57:39+00:00): 您好

我留意到一間加油站，一個社區大樓，兩個公車停車位置被移除，請問是否真如此？OpenStreetMap反應真實世界的變化，假若並沒有發生這些事情，請問移除。
unenTT (2026-06-08 11:02:45+00:00): Good day, 

Based on previous communication with one of our team members, and since the feature in question is last edited by you, please allow me to consult regarding https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1496095738

Our quality checks flagged the short section of the emergency lane between the motorway and the motorway link, and by looking at the Geobase Roads dataset as well, we think that short section should be deleted. 

Please let us know of your thoughts about it.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2026-06-08 11:55:00+00:00): This short segment is added for emergency vehicles and towing trucks so they can leave the motorway using the motorway link coming from the opposite side. Police cars and towing trucks would do that quite often when traffic is low. You can remove it if you want, since I am not sure emergency vehicles use OSM for routing, but they may be using it. We never know.
unenTT (2026-06-08 12:41:00+00:00): Thanks for this context, I understand. We'll perform the edit but also check for similar patterns to see how they are generally reflected in the database.
VictorIE (2026-04-06 12:07:58+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1496098792/history

This has name=Forbes Place and name:en=Forbes Place. However, the streets are named Long's Place and Forbes Lane.
Poprawiłem (2026-06-30 12:37:14+00:00): Usunięto tag smoothness=bad ze scieżki way/1442993764, który był dodany na podstawie wizyty w terenie.
voltairovicz (2026-06-30 12:41:10+00:00): Nie byłem tam przez te 3 miesiące. Jak wygląda postęp w budowie ścieżki rowerowej?
bxl-forever (2026-04-04 13:42:12+00:00): SVP uniquement background GRB pour tracer les maisons !!

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Belgium/Conventions/Buildings
literan (2026-04-06 19:24:21+00:00): очень много ошибок и нарисовано, увы, тяп-ляп - постоянные пересечения домиков с дорогами, описательные тексты в теге name (где место только именам собственным). Большую часть придется откатить.

Пожалуйста, если будете еще править, делайте это по чуть-чуть, обдуманно и медленно, не торопясь. Иначе придется откатывать все целиком
Poprawiłem (2026-06-30 12:50:34+00:00): Rowy:                                                                           
way/1385738580                                                                  
way/1385738579                                                                  
way/1385738578     
way/1385738577                                                             
są naturalnego pochodzenia.
NeisBot (2026-04-04 13:12:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13705561650 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Fotoğraf stüdyosu"
---
Örneğin metnin daha tarafsız ve gerçek bir versiyonu şöyle olabilir: "Fotoğraf stüdyosu"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-04-12 16:33:05+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/180899414
NeisBot (2026-04-04 13:15:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 9 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1338294465 v3 | 7 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/12378864468 v3
https://osm.org/node/12378981267 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180853095
NeisReview (2026-04-12 16:33:07+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/181220764
bxl-forever (2026-04-04 19:16:02+00:00): Hello,

"surface=paved" is an undefined category and always requires fixing.  I see you added lots of them in all your edits today.

Probably a mistake by French-speakers who are confused with « pavés ».

In general, in Belgium, most infrastructure will be among "asphalt" (typical for roads), "paving_stones" (= mostly flat paving stones, the most common sidewalk type in Belgium) or "sett" (= the bad stones everyone hates).

Thanks.
VisibleSouth (2026-04-04 22:08:07+00:00): Why do you keep making these typos? This isn't a motorway!
Jordi MF (2026-04-05 11:23:43+00:00): ¿Podrías indicar en qué fuene te has basado para indica que el uso en castellano de Monção es Monzón? En las siguientes webs escritas en castellano aparece como Monçao o Monção: https://elpais.com/elviajero/2020/07/07/album/1594139242_845999.html, https://viajes.nationalgeographic.com.es/a/pueblo-portugal-que-engano-ejercito-tirando-hogazas-pan-sus-murallas_23966, https://www.infominho.com/la-acm-de-moncao-compite-por-primera-vez-en-galicia-y-sube-a-lo-mas-alto-del-podio-60386.html
Tatfahren (2026-06-06 12:20:30+00:00): Laut Mapillary aus dem April ist im Osten keine Einbahnstraße. Im Westen gibt es leider keine Bilder. Hast du dich vielleicht in der Straße geirrt, oder die Einbahnstraße zuweit eingetragen?

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1869895713681665
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/10135399/history
matcher84 (2026-06-14 09:08:12+00:00): ich hab vor ort mich navigieren lassen, wurde falsch herum in die Freiberger Straße geschickt, hab die Einbahnstraße nachgetragen und prüfen lassen...