piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
BaboucheVerte (2023-08-30 04:41:13+00:00): Hi, why change the road from highway=residential to service ? It is residential roads
nileshdhandak (2023-08-30 10:05:59+00:00): As per my understanding, Roads insight the gated residential area, should be service with private access. Please suggest.
BaboucheVerte (2023-08-31 03:43:41+00:00): Just asked on OSM India telegram group, and it seems it's better to map highway=residential for residential way (like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/658679859), and highway=service for service roads (like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/660123527). I can make the switch to highway=residential if you want, because you need to know which are servce roads and which are service one
nileshdhandak (2023-08-31 05:35:08+00:00): Please do needful changes, which will help for better routing.
BaboucheVerte (2023-09-01 05:56:24+00:00): Done : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140662223

Please next time don't change the type of roads when adding access=private ! Thanks, and waiting to have OSM in Ola, still have GMaps ;(
Fizzie-DWG (2023-08-30 04:29:13+00:00): Reverted by DWG due to poor quality mapping

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140567866
mueschel (2023-08-31 10:03:48+00:00): Hi,
please check the areas you added here, several have tags like "COS18n3_C" which don't look like they should be in OSM.
SzymonH (2023-08-29 12:00:21+00:00): In my opinion "name" should be included in the description tag
HellMap (2023-08-29 16:00:33+00:00): Hello!

Can I ask where the name "plavūpe" is from for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1203087391?

This is also almost certainly not a river. It could be considered a stream, but it's most likely just a ditch. I'm not sure how you are measuring the width, but it's definitely not 5 meters wide water.

Also, tidal=yes shouldn't be specified on any water bodies so far from the coast - none of these are affected by the tides.

The geometry of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1203090258 looks incorrect - it's drawn almost on top of the road but the road here is 2 lanes wide.

I fixed some other issues with waterway relations. Notably, there are no tributaries or springs here.

I'll leave some additional comments on some other of your changes.

Thanks

P. S. I can reply in Latvian or Russian if English isn't the best.
Rihards123 (2023-08-30 11:28:22+00:00): Hi, sorry for my mistake i recently started mapping and i made afew mistakes, the reason i chose the name plavūpe is because it is reffered to as this by the locals,  plavūpe does not end there but isntead continues underground and continues and goes above ground after passing through the railway and continues through the lake, gathers waters from the 4 pedas lake and continues on word receiving waters from a small un named tributery and then flows into a small ditch witch connects to the dougava river, the small stream is one lf the few natural streams in the area, i scouted out the entire length of plavūpe today about  a hour ago,  you can also see the stream on old soviet maps . Im a local and live by the ditch so that's the reason it peaks my interest
Rihards123 (2023-08-30 11:33:18+00:00): As for the small ditch, i marked it as intermittent, it connects to the plavūpe stream
HellMap (2023-08-30 11:51:21+00:00): Ok, sounds good!

I'll double-check and fix any issues later.
Rihards123 (2023-08-30 12:04:02+00:00): Ok,  if you do go there in real life there are sometimes ducks in the stream, and if you go there today be careful there are severe weather alerts for later today!
HellMap (2023-08-30 12:26:15+00:00): I don't live here exactly, but I have biked past here a bunch of few times in the past. I know there are ditches and streams here, although I didn't think any of them as large enough to count as streams. If the steam really connects all the way through this area, then is can probably be classified as a stream. There are a lot of ditches and streams that are not draw on the map yet.
Rihards123 (2023-08-30 12:38:06+00:00): That's nice, but yea the stream connects all the the way to the dougava,  so it's atleast 5km long, i walked alongside it for quite a while and part of it is already shown on the map , it also has some minor ditches withch make it much wider in it's lower stretches, plavūpe is actually natural , it's been here for ever, those are kind of rare around Salaspils because the natural ones often get barried or covered especially because the build up of the town happened recently so there are new rodes and houses everywhere witch take the place of the natural streams, plavūpe used to be slightly bigger but in 80s and 90s from what i know houses were built on top of some of it's small tributerys, but the stream survives till this day, it's common to see ditches around here but not streams, i highly suggest following the stream, it's buetiful and the wildife is plentiful, it's good you cant Hunt around these parts
Rihards123 (2023-08-30 17:21:02+00:00): Hi hellmap, i need a second opinion on something, plavūpe flows into a drain next to the dougava, should it be considered plavūpe or not, plavupe was there much much longer , but still it just flowed intot he dougava not in thr Location where the drain does
HellMap (2023-08-30 17:31:55+00:00): It depends on official maps, names and data. But the drain is most likely not called anything. The connection between the drain and Daugava just doesn't exist anymore, so there is no named stream there.
streckenkundler (2023-08-29 15:24:55+00:00): Hei,

eine ganz große Bitte habe ich: splitte Kreisverkehre nur auf, wenn es aus baulichen Gründen nötig ist: vor allem, wenn sich innerhalb des Kreisverkehres die Anzahl der Fahrpuren ändert. Bei allen anderen Dingen, wie hier Radwege, ect. ist das nicht nötig. Im Gegenteil, es verkompliziert sehr die Erfassung. Es müsste an allen Ein- und Ausfahrten aufgesplittet werden und je nach Abschnitt und Route mit forward-/backward-Rollen gearbeitet werden. 

Solche Aufsplittungen sind auch für andere Relationen (Ich denke hier an Busrouten, wenn man diese erfassen möchte) in keinster Weise nötig.

Aber der Kreisverkehr wird eh noch mal angefasst werden, wenn man im Luftbild auch die Fußwege sieht...

Danke,

Sven

PS: Aufmerksam bin ich durch https://www.knooppuntnet.nl/de/analysis/cycling/de/networks geworden
lollybyte (2023-08-29 16:28:06+00:00): Hi Sven,
ich bin bislang so verfahren: Kreisverkehre, die nicht aufgesplittet sind, werden von mir nicht angerührt. Ist, wie von Dir dargelegt, für eine "gültige" Relation nicht notwendig und würde weitere, bestehende Relationen aufbrechen. Kreisverkehre, die bereits aufgesplittet wurden, werden von mir nach Bedarf weiter aufgesplittet und sollte bestehende Relationen nicht ungültig machen. In diesem Fall war der Kreisverkehr bereits aufgesplittet.

Ist es Konsens, dass aufgesplittete Kreisverkehre unter den o.g. baulichen Voraussetzungen wieder vereint werden sollten?

Grüße
lb
streckenkundler (2023-08-29 19:59:34+00:00): Hei,

Nun, ich persönlich würde es durchaus als etabliert betrachten, Kreisverkehre nur bei baulicher Notwendigkeit aufzusplitten... 
Alles andere sorgt für einen sehr großen Mehraufwand beim Mapping.
Wie ich schrieb, beim Splitten muß dann ganz konsequent mit Forward/Backward gearbeitet werden, bei allen Routen... wir mit JOSM bekommen das hin, andere mit iD, ect... Das hab ich ob meiner Erfahrung so meine Zweifel...
Bei einem nicht gesplittetem Kreisverkehr entfällt das alles...  Man macht es allen wesentlich einfacher, auch in der Auswertung!
Bei einem gesplittetem Kreisverkehr muß an allen (!!) Stellen gesplittet werden: an allen Einfahrten, an allen Ausfahrten. Alle (!!) Routen-Relationen dürfen dann nur noch die verwendeten Segmente enthalten, dann aber zwingend mit forward-/backward-Rollen...

Der Erfassungsaufwand und dann in der Folge der Pflegeaufwand ist dann meiner Meinung nach  für mich doch recht groß!

Die Auswertung von https://www.knooppuntnet.nl/en/analysis/cycling/de/networks beachtet sowas, mein Gram ist, daß es eine solche vergleichbare Auswertung nicht auch für andere, hier z.B. Themenradrouten gibt... Hintergrund ist ja, daß z.B. sowohl Knotenpunktrouten, als auch Themenradrouten immer und stets in beiden Richtungen funktionieren müssen... 

Meinst du, das sollte im Forum nochmal thematisiert werden?

Grüße,

Sven
lollybyte (2023-08-31 19:01:17+00:00): Hi Sven,
passt so für mich. Die Argumentation bezüglich Wartbarkeit und Komplexität ist nachvollziehbar. Werde Kreisverkehre nach Möglichkeit mergen.

Grüße,
lb
Fizzie-DWG (2023-08-30 05:16:03+00:00): Reverted by DWG for vandalism - changing University grounds to a park

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140568909
NorthCrab_upload (2023-08-29 11:31:14+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11152925572

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Kamila Baczyńskiego":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11152925463

"Zakładowa":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11152925464
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11152925465
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11152925587

"Hallera":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11152925618

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
G_P_J (2023-08-29 12:46:47+00:00): Poprawione.
gabro00 (2023-08-29 15:47:12+00:00): Szia!
A felül nyomós funkciótól nem lesz intermittent=yes. Valami másféle címkézés kellene rá, ha mindenképp jelölni szeretnéd.
Itt van pár példa: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Ddrinking_water
user_399857 (2023-08-29 20:01:50+00:00): Szia!

"Hol működik, hol nem", ezért kapott időszakos jelzést, de nem írtam bele a leírásba, mert egyeztetés alatt van, hogy ez mit takar. (Napon belül? El is zárják, vagy csak a játszótér miatt nem elérhető, csak pontatlan a fogalmazás? (Sok ilyen van.) Évszakonként? Satöbbi, de addig is kapott egy jelzést, hogy nem biztos, hogy mindig megy.)
bkil (2023-08-29 21:00:38+00:00): A `note` kulcs arra való, hogy a szerkesztőtársaknak jelezzünk valami meghökkentő, ellentmondásos információt, mint például `lebontották 2023-ban, ne rajzold vissza újra`. Ezt mutatják is QA eszközök, így ha lehet, jó lenne ezt a nézetet tisztát tartani olyasmiktől amit nem kell megvizsgálnom. Esetleg addig description? Neked itt szerintem a handle=button kell https://wiki.osm.org/Key:handle
biobuur (2024-03-02 09:59:30+00:00): Du hast in Rohrbach viele living_streets getaggt. Das ist nicht zutreffend. Es handelt sich um residential
NorthCrab_upload (2023-08-29 11:31:13+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1200617977

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
b-holdet (2023-11-27 09:16:22+00:00): Må jeg spørge hvorfor du har sat attraction=animal på denne her?
empty_child (2023-08-29 12:51:28+00:00): Hello lasha41,
Please, follow the community style guides: we use local names in main name tag
empty_child (2023-08-31 14:13:35+00:00): Reverted in 140637965
Rukkhadevata (2023-09-02 16:24:23+00:00): In China, "districts" are not necessarily part of a city, especially those transformed from counties(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/District_(China)). 
"Some districts today are just like counties, with large towns and townships under them governing rural areas."
At the same time, according to the current norms of CN(mainland) communities, a district, regardless of whether it is part of a city, is labeled as place=city (with counties and county-level cities at the same level). Also you can see how widely "districts" are labeled as place=city in China and there's no controversial yet: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/place%3ACN=district#overview
user_14538650 (2023-09-02 16:47:10+00:00): I'm not 100% percent sure about "regardless of whether it is part of a city" part". place=suburb exists for a reason, which here means "an administrative element that is part of the city". If a city has many districts and counties in it, then all should be tagged with place=suburb, because it's a more precise tag to be used. In Vietnam, we also have ambiguous cases like that, such as "quận" for districts and "huyện" for rural districts/counties, and currently we are (trying) to follow this convention.
user_14538650 (2023-09-02 16:48:33+00:00): In the case of Vietnam, we tag quận with place=suburbs, while we left out huyện because they are usually rural areas with no significant settlement areas. I'm not sure what's the case in China, and I think you should discuss with your fellow editors about this tag.
Rukkhadevata (2023-09-03 16:00:16+00:00): In China, place=suburb is mainly used to tag the next-level division (admin_level=8) of districts and counties in urban built-up areas (with place:CN=subdistrict). If administrative divisions at level 8 are outside urban built-up areas, their labels will be marked as place=town.
In short, place=suburb will not be used in labels of districts or counties (admin_level=6).
biobuur (2024-03-01 14:51:44+00:00): Hallo mCypress1
Du hast die Bahnhofstrasse in Huttwil von primary auf livingstreet geändert. Ich denke, das ist falsch. Es handelt sich keineswegs um eine Wohnstrasse, sondern um eine Durchgangsstrasse mit red Geschwindigkeit. Kennst du die Verhältnisse vor Ort? Wo siehst du den Grund zur ànderung?
mottiger (2024-09-16 13:54:00+00:00): Ich habe es mal zurück geändert:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156689747
Und gerade noch die fehlenden maxspeed=30 ergänzt.
memmerick (2023-08-30 12:12:48+00:00): Hej archie, 
I'm new to OSM an I'm happy with your sophisticated and mysterious method of a relation / superroute!
Just when I search for the name 'Höglandsleden' there is no result. That's why I added the name as a name yesterday. Of course, it's tedious to give a name to hundreds of fractions of the path. So:
- Can you make the existing name and thus the path itself searchable?
- Can we add the name "Smalandsleden" here in Smaland, too? Because that is what you find on the signposts.
Tack and thank you, best regards
Martin
archie (2023-08-30 16:25:59+00:00): Yes, you are quite right. Hiking route-relations are not searchable. Please contact Nominatim; it is them which are responsible for search functions in osm.   
As I mentioned for you earlier  don't mix  highway names and route-relation names. The "name" for the hiking-route is in the route-relation, not on the individual parts of the hiking route. Often beginners find this hard to grasp.
Alexey Lukin (2023-09-26 01:14:18+00:00): Pavel, the "siding spur" that you've added to the New Athos railway does not exist. The only two siding tracks on this railway are at the terminal stations.
In place of your "siding spur", there is actually a terminal gallery (nicknamed "Surprise"), but it has never had a railway in it.
I will delete the railway spur as nonexistent.
empty_child (2023-09-26 09:03:40+00:00): Hello Alexey Lukin,
No problem, I used open data and couldn't have a possibility to check it in real life
DaveF (2023-09-10 10:59:22+00:00): Hi Your edit appears to have caused a split in the NCN 4 cycle route. Could you take a look at it  please.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1203094564

https://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeMap?relationId=1318929
HellMap (2023-08-29 16:00:35+00:00): You specified that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1203094652 and further is a tunnel and a pipe - are you sure this is correct? This stream/ditch is visible of LIDAR layer and it doesn't look like it's some sort of underground pipe. If you could explain what you meant, I could fix it and set the right tags.
Rihards123 (2023-08-30 11:31:27+00:00): Hi ,It is there I've been there, it is from what i could gsther a natural small stream, it's course changed quite a bit over time, it's vissable on a few old soviet maps with it's course having altered slightly
Rihards123 (2023-08-30 11:43:07+00:00): Ah yes it is not a pipe, i was intending that a small section is however i made a mistake
HellMap (2023-08-30 11:48:04+00:00): Is this stream underground in a pipe?

You can also switch the background layer to LIDAR to see how streams flow https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer This can help drawing them (just note that the LIDAR is not exact).
Rihards123 (2023-08-30 12:01:56+00:00): Ok thanks,  the stream is not in a underground pipe however it does go through a few small tunnels ubder driveways
empty_child (2023-08-29 12:17:03+00:00): Hello afnxn,
Why you reverted my changeset?
map per (2023-09-11 16:19:14+00:00): Hallo Gertinger,

in OSM werden auch private Wege eingezeichnet und dann mit access=private gekennzeichnet. Ich hab den Weg deshalb wieder verlängert.

Viele Grüße
map per
aceman444 (2024-06-05 18:20:09+00:00): Hi, I hope you also compared with Slovak cadastre map, not just Ortofotomozaika SR. And why the removals of grass in Tatranska Lomnica and Stary Smokovec?
NorthCrab_upload (2023-08-29 12:40:26+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11153080405

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
sq5gn (2023-08-29 12:55:47+00:00): Cześć Krabie, ale punkt jest już dobrze zaznaczony?
W tym samym sklepie Dyży Ben znajdują się równolegle DPD Pickup i InPost Paczkopunkt. Co w takim wypadku?
NorthCrab (2023-08-29 13:39:36+00:00): O kurczę, aż tak to nie jestem rozeznany ale pamiętam że ktoś już o tym gdzieś rozmawiał:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/punkt-odbioru-i-nadawania-paczek-nie-paczkomat/8787
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/oznaczanie-paczkomatow-propozycja/93440/16

Zawsze możesz wpaść na naszego Discorda i zapytać osobiście, albo najprościej zostawić informacje w Notatka na obiekcie żeby przyszły edytor wiedział o co chodzi.
starsep (2023-12-14 22:40:52+00:00): Przeniosłem informacje o punkcie odbioru paczek jako tagi sklepu. https://osm.org/node/11153071408
Chwilowo w Polsce jest to rzadko mapowana informacja
Patrickov (2023-09-05 01:59:35+00:00): If that section of road was closed bus companies would have issued notice on bus stop re-location, but I didn't find any.  Are you sure you are right?
Patrickov (2023-09-05 15:54:36+00:00): Okay I found some official notice which probably supports your change to Mong Kok Road.  However, you did it in a very crude way, not even bothering to tidy up the bus routes involved in that section.  Please at least move the bus stop position nodes and re-route the involved bus routes.  And try not to bundle so many changes in one place.  I think you are already editing more than you can handle.
Patrickov (2023-09-05 15:59:03+00:00): I had moved the node and re-routed the routes to make them consistent for now in changeset 140857575
dcapillae (2023-08-29 13:27:06+00:00): Buenas tardes.

Este conjunto de cambios fue revertido.

El parque Martiricos ya existe en el mapa. Por favor, no añada objetos duplicados.

Gracias por su colaboración.

Atentamente,

Daniel Capilla
SomeoneElse (2023-09-01 10:09:40+00:00): Hello,
I don't think that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/222295786 is "foot=no".  I walked down here on 6th August (unfortunately I haven't updated OSM with it yet).  There's actually a pavement (sidewalk) on the southern bit of Farnham Lane that continues down the A road past the new housing estate, and the bit of Boroughbridge Road east of Farnham lane has a verge on the north.  I didn't walk that bit though so I'm not sure how far that goes.
However, unless there's explicit signage it's still legal to walk on a road in the UK even if there's no pavement or verge.
Cheers,
Andy
indofraiser (2023-09-01 10:43:42+00:00): Amended. Split as footpath goes along Farnham Lane to Knarsbough. It does not go towards Boughbridge, no paved areas that way. (on this part)
NorthCrab_upload (2023-08-29 13:13:21+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Rodziny Seydów":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11153166143
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11153166251

"Sosnowa":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11153166163
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11153166267
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11153166268

"Gajowa":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11153166175

"Cisowa":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11153166180
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11153166181

"Kazimierza Fiałkowskiego":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11153166235
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11153166249

"14 Lutego 1942 roku":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11153166250

"Wspólna":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11153166259

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Lyon-St-Clair (2023-08-31 19:16:15+00:00): Salut, selon la VdL la rue est barrée jusqu'au 19 septembre : https://www.vdl.lu/fr/se-deplacer/informations-trafic/trafic-info/travaux-dans-la-rue-des-scillas
Leo Bri (2023-09-01 11:58:30+00:00): La rue a été rouverte en sens unique (direction sud) en date 29.07.2023 sans communication officielle. J'ai apporté les modifications suite à plusieurs visites sur le lieu. La réouverture en double sens est effectivement programmée pour le 19.09.2023, comme indiqué officiellement sur le site de la VdL.
Leo Bri (2023-09-01 12:00:59+00:00): Correction: il y a eu une communication officielle de la part des Ponts et chaussées pour la réouverture en sens unique: https://pch.gouvernement.lu/fr/actualites.gouvernement%2Bfr%2Bactualites%2Btoutes_actualites%2Bcommuniques%2B2023%2B07-juillet%2B28-reouverture-rue-scillas-howald.html
Lyon-St-Clair (2023-09-01 16:31:09+00:00): En effet, j'ai vu après coup cette communication.
FraukeLeo (2024-02-06 10:22:36+00:00): Hallo Langlaeufer, es liegt vielleicht an mir, aber ich werde nie verstehen, was an diesen doppelten 30-Grad-Knicken (Beispiel: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/35626864) besser ist als an dem fließenden Übergang, der davor hier gemappt war (https://ibb.co/y5KFsTg) und der doch den tatsächlichen Verlauf der Fahrbahn sehr viel besser abbildet. Da ist doch real gar kein Doppelknick, sondern nur eine sanfte Kurve, also warum soll dann in den Daten einer sein? Ich verstehs einfach nicht :)
Langlaeufer (2024-02-06 13:14:31+00:00): Ich denke diese Stelle war nicht das worauf ich mich bei der Bearbeitung konzentriert hatte. Es ist sowieso noch nicht korrekt weil die baulich Trennung an der Stelle gar nicht endet.
Langlaeufer (2024-02-06 13:25:51+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147135693 
Du darfst gerne verschönern.
Đuro Jiří (2023-10-27 11:10:22+00:00): Ciao DaveMzp,
brand Enel X e operator Be Charge?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11153187582/history
czebureks (2023-08-30 01:59:15+00:00): Świetna i precyzyjna edycja. Dzięki za pomoc w mapowaniu osiedli!
Frans S (2023-08-31 10:36:04+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
A remark. You often need 8 nodes to map a building with an extension where 6 nodes are enough.
Don't you use the plugin building tool ?
Best regards
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-05-01 00:23:00+00:00): Where did you find the name Brehm
Bronk7295 (2024-05-01 00:45:08+00:00): Google, but I think I mislabeled it here by a block.
Bronk7295 (2024-05-01 00:46:04+00:00): Nope, I take that back. Google says that it's Brehm.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-05-01 00:48:50+00:00): You're not allowed to use Google as a source. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-05-01 00:51:18+00:00): Besides the point but Google is wrong in this case.
Snusmumriken (2023-08-30 06:55:38+00:00): Jo, jag skulle vilja komma med en kommentar gällande dina ändringar. Det gällar adresserna. Jag har jobbat en tid med detta i Stockholms innerstad, så att alla finns med men också att de är unika, dvs. att en given adress bara finns en gång i OSMs databas. Jag har sedan använt provides_feature relationen för att indikera att en viss restaurang har en viss adress. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Provides_feature