piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
dgmapping (2023-01-03 22:42:33+00:00): My understanding is that these puiestee streets in Lasnamäe are a little bit different from usual kergliiklustee because they are wider, share a common naming schema and connect different areas together. Therefore I expect them to be somehow distinguished form the rest of footways.

Even in Maa-ameti map these streets are visually different by having dotted green line and by having "Tähtsus: Jalgtänav" tag:
https://xgis.maaamet.ee/xgis2/page/link/cYuzPofv

Now that the carto tiles are updated for all zoom levels I agree that in some cases they appear to be almost too wide...

But if "jalgtänava" classification don't match the pedestrian highway type then feel free to change it back to footway. I don't mind if jalgtänava definition is ignored.

Lastly I found it interesting that some sections of Saarepiiga pst were changed to pedestrian 4 years ago:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/48376756/history

I personally find it a little confusing to spit such a short street into different waytypes.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-01-05 18:12:26+00:00): About Saarepiiga bridge - I see you've added bicycle=designated, but I vaguely remember it having a pedestrian way sign. Has this been changed?
dgmapping (2023-01-05 20:21:59+00:00): Here you can see the traffic signs:
https://goo.gl/maps/6VSntf5K5Ji65sTP6
https://goo.gl/maps/wYLeQ4cg4JER7YQu9
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-01-06 11:47:38+00:00): We cannot use Google as a source. And the signs I'm talking about were on the bridge.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-01-06 11:50:29+00:00): https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=59.43931613014&lng=24.84471821018&z=17&pKey=245140930775705&x=0.48511907492081197&y=0.5940202549096453&zoom=0&focus=photo

Here's an image from an allowed source.
dgmapping (2023-01-06 13:53:52+00:00): 1) I wasn't using Google maps as source.

2) Not sure about the bridge. If you belie bicycle is incorrectly tagged feel free to correct it.

3) While Maa-ameti kaart classifies Saarepiiga puiestee (7841216) as Jalgtänav then in Teeregister the whole street with the bridge has "Liigitus":

Tee tüüp: 5 - jalg- ja jalgrattatee

Tee jaotus: 2 - kohalik tee
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-09-15 23:38:46+00:00): revertido. eu havia corrigido este trecho de acordo com o Strava pois as imagens estão desatualizadas e este changeset voltou para o estado errado.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-09-15 23:51:13+00:00): https://apps.sentinel-hub.com/sentinel-playground/?source=S2L2A&lat=1.3351&lng=-60.33230000000003&zoom=15&preset=2_FALSE_COLOR&layers=B01,B02,B03&maxcc=20&gain=1.0&gamma=1.0&time=2023-03-01%7C2023-09-02&atmFilter=&showDates=false
SekeRob (2023-01-11 10:20:19+00:00): Hi,

Si prega di prestare attenzione alle strade che attraversano gli edifici quando li si aggiunge. Regolare le posizioni in modo appropriato

Grazie
Aluminum0173 (2023-01-11 10:24:19+00:00): Ci si prova ma l'immagine satellitare non è dritta quindi non è semplice se non impossibile, sono strade super strette, proverò a migliorare.
Aluminum0173 (2023-01-11 10:33:54+00:00): Risolto
SekeRob (2023-01-11 15:31:33+00:00): In realtà le immagini di Bing sono state scattate con un angolo del 10-15%. I muri sono visibili dallo spazio, quindi i tetti devono essere spostati sul bordo della fondazione del muro. L'ESRI regolare è migliore sotto questo aspetto e il più delle volte più recente. Lo strumento OSM JOSM in realtà avvisa che BING ed ESRI Clarity devono essere corretti dall'offset.

Buona mappature
Aluminum0173 (2023-01-11 15:51:55+00:00): Grazie mille, davvero!
rskedgell (2023-03-31 12:31:02+00:00): Hi,

I've changed w1126531149 across the A12 slip roads to not:highway=footway. Although it's perfectly possible and legal to cross here (and I sometimes do just that), it results in all the pedestrian routers I've tried taking the informal shortcut rather than the actual crossings.

e.g.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_foot&route=51.53066%2C-0.01232%3B51.52849%2C-0.01819#map=19/51.52958/-0.01526&layers=N
adiatmad (2023-01-03 08:49:02+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM,
You added a long name which may fit as note=* (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:note)
(https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1126532599).
Could you please double check that?
Happy mapping!
eggie (2023-01-02 18:52:20+00:00): Hoogte van de boom 140 meter?
surface=sand? 
Comentaar WOW?
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=130799340

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-01-02 19:00:03+00:00): reverted by changeset #130799934
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:06:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:04:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:07:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:07:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:06:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:08:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
habi (2023-01-08 19:01:53+00:00): Ciao SF23
Ich bin heute durch die Thunstrasse gevelölet.
ActicFitness ist aussen am Gebäude ungefähr dort angeschrieben, wo die Hausnummer 110 auftaucht, während der Migros-Eingang an der Ecke ist.
Ich hab' ActivFitness etwas von deiner Position wegbewegt.
Gruss,
habi
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:09:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
yasslay (2023-01-02 18:55:15+00:00): Apologies, the note was cut off for no apparent reason. For those wondering, I'm inviting whoever wishes to review this changeset to give their take on the name I've assigned the A2 here and whether or not it is suitable.
DD1GJ (2023-01-02 19:20:17+00:00): Der Weg war, erkennbar durch die Strichelung, als privat gekennzeichnet. Die Disponenten in Rettungsleitstellen schätzen es sehr, wenn auf den ersten Blick erkennbar ist, wie man zu den zurückliegenden Häusern kommt.

Die Löschung wurde daher rückgängig gemacht.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:10:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
Dimitar155 (2023-01-02 21:07:31+00:00): I assume it's just closed and not completely demolished. If that's the case, disused:amenity=fuel is more appropriate.
rhhs (2023-01-03 08:23:12+00:00): Yes, that's better, thanks!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:05:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:04:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:10:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:07:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
Kasey2 (2023-01-03 15:25:54+00:00): Dzięki!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:06:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:04:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:09:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:06:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:08:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:10:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:04:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
surveyor54 (2023-01-03 08:36:23+00:00): Hi,
dir ist hier ein Malheur passiert.
Dir sind beim Editieren die Gebäude 
Friedrich-Fendt-Straße 50, 46, 42 und 38, sowie Am Nußgraben 36 abhanden gekommen.

Gruß
surveyor54
KartoGrapHiti (2023-01-03 10:26:16+00:00): Danke für den guten Hinweis. Ich habe es jetzt korrigiert.
surveyor54 (2023-01-04 07:35:34+00:00): Bitte 👍
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:08:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:04:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:07:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
eggie (2023-01-02 20:17:21+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback Eklk begin is moeilijk.. Svp geen accesstags op vlakken zetten zoals op een bos.
Je hebt een hek vastgemaakt aan een hoogspanningsleiding van 	380000 V van Tennett en een administratieve grens.
Probeer ook niet te schuiven met de kaart in editmodus . Dat geeft vaak schade. Dus het gebied klein houden en in verschillende changesets uploaden.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-01-02 20:24:56+00:00): Grens losgemaakt van afrastering..
wetland hoort niet op een node. Het kan wel op een vlak. 
natural=water 
water=pond  zou kunnen op een vlak..... intermittent=yes als er niet altijd water staat. 
wetland= pond is in ieder geval niet correct
Wat is het object hier precies?
eggie (2023-01-02 20:27:48+00:00): Die wetlands heb ik even verwijderd dan kun je dat even opnieuw bekijken.
Zie
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural=wetland
eggie (2023-01-02 20:30:19+00:00): Waarom denk je dat naast het Krabbenterrein water ligt ipv grass?
De voorgaande mapper was ikzelf.
Wellicht nu scrub?
eggie (2023-01-02 20:33:04+00:00): Het Geuzenbos heb je voorzien van een aantal accestags. Dat hoort niet. 
... landuse=forest hoort niet op de omtrek. Het is een multipolygoon..  forest staat al op de relatie.
Ik haal de tagging even weg.
Uiteraard kun je dat nog niet weten. 
Elk begin is moeilijk.
eggie (2023-01-02 20:37:19+00:00): Mocht Geuzenbos  (de naam staat al op de relatie)  niet renderen dan kun je ook een node aanmaken met place =locality  name=Geuzenbos. Even de rendering afwachten.
eggie (2023-01-02 20:37:54+00:00): Het rendert gewoon als bos met naam ....  wat was het probleem?
eggie (2023-01-02 20:45:31+00:00): Het pad bij de Meelzakseweg staat op access=no  
access=no is bijna altijd fout icm met andere accesstags. 
Het zorgt er ook voor dat je het pad bijna niet ziet op dekaart.
Klopt hier dus access=no wel of kan dat er weer af?
eggie (2023-01-02 20:59:06+00:00): De poelen onder de hoogspanningskabel heb ik opnieuw ingetekend als vlak met wetland.
eggie (2023-01-02 21:06:44+00:00): In het begin wordt meegekeken.. uiteraard om te helpen.  
Probeer niet te veel in één keer te veranderen.
De Mp op het krabbenterrein heb ik aangepast. Het water links ervan het ik omgezet naar scrub.. Dat scrub  op het terrein staat op de (outer) relatie scrub en water. .. Anders zie je alles door elkaar. 
Mapse
eggie
RobbertWolf (2023-01-02 21:08:24+00:00): Hallo Eggie, heel wat beginnersfouten, ik zal wat voorzichtiger zijn volgende keer :-) Dank voor de feedback.
Ik zie dat ik niet per bericht kan reageren, dus hierbij reactie op een aantal punten (geen reactie = uiteraard gewoon geaccepteerd):
- de drie ponds zijn zgn paddenpoelen (betonnen poelen aangelegd voor rugstreeppadden). Zal er geen node meer op zetten, is voor gemiddelde publiek ook niet zo interessant vermoedelijk 
- Gebied naast Krabbenterrein is jaar of 2 geleden heringericht en is nu 'natte duinvallei'. Het is dus geen water maar ook geen gras.
- Meelzakseweg access=no kan er inderdaad af, zal foutje geweest zijn (excuus)
eggie (2023-01-02 21:31:07+00:00): Ahh  oke...  Dan zal ik die natte duinvallei aanpassen naar wetland met nog een tag...denk reedbed  
Ik had er even scrub van gemaakt. Even zoeken in de wiki.
Wanneer je iets beters ziet kun je het uiteraard aanpassen. Je moet maar eens kijken. Soms komen we smaken te kort en zoek je iets wat het dichtste bij de waarheid komt. 
access=no kun je zelf wel verwijderen. 
Laat je niet weerhouden door wat kritiek. 
Veel plezier met mappen.
eggie
eggie (2023-01-02 21:34:29+00:00): Het natte stuk aangepast als bovenstaand.
Paar keer CTRL-F5 voor het effect.
Groet
eggie
eggie (2023-01-02 21:39:00+00:00): ... en je paddenpoelen staan er gewoon op nu als vlak. 
Voor dat je door de berg rijstebrij heen bent met al die mogelijkheden in OSM ben je wel een paar weken verder. .. maar het komt vanzelf.
cotara (2023-01-24 11:58:14+00:00): Relacja szlaku rowerowego wiedzie chodnikiem 
masz jakieś źródło dokładniejsze przebiegu np. ślad GPX
bo na pewno nowy przebieg nie pokrywa się  z starą ścieżką
Shymeck (2023-01-24 21:06:39+00:00): Zaktualizowałem przebieg nowych ścieżek na podstawie śladu GPX.
Mazda05 (2023-01-14 15:42:33+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Russian–Ukrainian_war
aTarom (2023-01-03 08:27:50+00:00): Hola IldefonsoPM,
gracias por editar,
estas vías son una subida accidental de un track gpx? Le faltan etiquetas standar y le sobran las del "gpx:..." en las vías y en todos sus nodos, lo puedes revisar?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1126544654/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1126544652/history
Saludos
Shaun das Schaf (2023-01-03 10:15:26+00:00): Hallo MaWi80, willkommen bei OSM!

Ist die Straße zwischen Niederheuslingen und Oberfischbach wirklich durchgehend 50 km/h bis auf diesen winzig kleinen Abschnitt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/294379627 ?

Bitte nochmal kontrollieren und ggf. korrigieren.

Viele Grüße
Shaun das Schaf
spiregrain (2023-01-02 22:14:07+00:00): Looks good!
arcturusss (2023-01-19 14:01:05+00:00): Why did you change cemetery tags? It was correctly tagged as military cemetery https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yerablur
yuryleb (2023-01-19 19:41:55+00:00): Military cemetery tags were just moved to outer polygon https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/88569054 enclosed the whole cemetery area.
arcturusss (2023-01-20 10:29:34+00:00): Oh, didn't notice that. Thank you!
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-04-07 01:08:50+00:00): Southwest Canyon Road address seams wrong. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/99054932
Fizzie-DWG (2025-03-14 06:12:43+00:00): Reverted by DWG - use of unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163597022
nie_podaje_nazwy (2023-01-02 21:06:42+00:00): ktoś wie jak oznaczyć kapliczkę?
NorthCrab (2023-01-03 02:04:33+00:00): Wayside shrine (kapliczka) albo Wayside cross (krzyż) w edytorze wyszukaj
NorthCrab (2023-01-05 19:50:22+00:00): Witaj na OpenStreetMap!
Poprosiliście o weryfikację.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1126548225
To jest driveway, nie droga residential.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1126548228
Nie dodawaj zbędnych tagów dostępowych - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Poland

Pozdrawiam!
user_12531033 (2023-01-02 20:09:49+00:00): sry for typo
#High-Speed Line
mini-me (2023-01-28 20:26:26+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#name:language_code
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-18 18:31:10+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10301146879/history has fixme = yes that was added in this edit
What requires fixing here? fixme=yes is not particularly clear, and maybe problem got fixed since then?
Robot8A (2025-12-18 20:43:27+00:00): Looking at the tagging shop=yes, probably because I couldn't find the shop type while on the phone. Looking online, it seems they've closed, so I mark the shop as disused.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-03-14 06:12:44+00:00): Reverted by DWG - use of unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163597022
kaciorx (2023-01-03 16:11:41+00:00): Zadanie pochodzi z SC
v4g4 (2023-01-02 21:54:27+00:00): Bonjour, après avoir ajouté l'altitude pour le Pic d'Alian, je m'attendais a ce que l'altitude apparaisse sous celui ci ( Pic d'Alian 1089m) mais ce n'est pas le cas. Pouvez vous m'aider svp ? Merci
*abq* (2023-01-06 19:31:18+00:00): Hi cosmografix,
you have changed access tags on the tracks on Plateau de Caume arbitrarily back to access yes. These tracks are clearly signed locally to be access=no.
Best regards 
Reiner
cOSMografix (2023-01-11 21:04:30+00:00): Bonjour 
Ce n'est pas arbitraire puisque je viens souvent ici et le jour de la modification il n'y avait pas d'indication d'interdiction pour le chemin "sud". Seulement pour la boucle "nord". De plus cette interdiction n'est que temporaire pour éviter d'aller dans certaines zones ou des expériences de plantations sont effectuées. 
Les routes et chemins du plateau des Alpilles en général sont interdites au véhicules à moteurs mais en aucun cas au piétons/cyclistes sauf en période "rouge" incendie de Juin à septembre. Je met donc les attributs aux chemins telles qu'ils doivent êtres il me semble.
Cordialement.
*abq* (2023-01-12 10:24:38+00:00): I was there two weeks ago and it was signed with defense d'entrer, similar as the northern loop. For some reason, in this part of the Parc Regional rules are stricter. Please see also the changesets by PNRAlpilles nearby.
dafadllyn (2023-01-27 21:21:34+00:00): Hi! Please be careful next time when mapping from aerial imagery without having visited the place. You've reintroduced a roundabout that no longer exists for a year.
user_3022894 (2023-05-07 15:45:49+00:00): Warum hast du hier den Walter-Scheel-Platz gelöscht?
user_3022894 (2023-05-07 15:47:39+00:00): Oder hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1126555473/history

diese Ausdehnung des Walter-Scheel-Platzes ist doch völlig falsch.
cotara (2023-01-24 11:54:33+00:00): zdublowała się ścieżka wzdłuż ulicy sportowej
Shymeck (2023-01-24 12:11:28+00:00): Usunąłem zdublowaną nitkę. Do poprawki może być skrzyżowanie ścieżek przy Sportowej - po wizycie na miejscu.
woodpeck_repair (2023-01-12 10:34:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 131180818 where the changeset comment is: revert edits by user The Siren Hunter's as they contained lots of unexplained deletions and node displacements
NorthCrab (2023-01-05 19:57:14+00:00): Witaj, poprosiliście o weryfikację.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1126558996
Uważaj aby nie dodawać duplikatów. https://i.imgur.com/cMxndZ4.png Na twoim obrysie jest już adres którego nie usunąłeś. Teraz wygląda na to że są 2 punkty z adresem - 1 twój nowy obrys, 2 wiszący na nim punkt. Punkt używamy gdy dokładna lokalizacja nie jest znana lub gdy na 1 obrysie jest kilka adresów. Poprawiłem i złączyłem punkt do obrysu.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1126558986
Taka uliczka parkingowa to parking aisle zamiast service.

Pozdrawiam!
Fl1tzi (2023-01-03 13:52:07+00:00): Willst du immer noch nicht antworten? Was soll diese Änderung bringen?
Fl1tzi (2023-01-03 13:57:00+00:00): Die Hausnummern befinden sich jetzt an den Enden vom driveway und nicht mehr in den Daten der Gebäude. Nicht nur ist das nicht mehr konsistent zu jeglicher andere Nummerierung, sondern macht auch alles noch verwirrender. highway=service hast du auch noch gleich entfernt, sodass service=driveway auch keine Wirkung mehr hat. Bitte Wiki lesen und Nachrichten lesen, sodass man hier auf eine Einigung kommt.

Das ist hier keine Testversion von OSM.
bergaufsee (2023-01-03 17:34:03+00:00): Hallo Caputt,

du hast aber auch die eine oder andere Zufahrt Caputt gemacht ;)
service=driveway ohne highway=service funktioniert nicht, z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/785164379

auch möglich dass dein Navi nicht über Privatwege führt...
Caputt (2023-01-03 17:55:11+00:00): Hallo, ich werde das mal heute richten und morgen mit OSMand testen. und ja ... bin noch kein Profi  ;) Danke Euch für die schnelle Bewertung.
Fl1tzi (2023-01-03 18:26:48+00:00): Ah okay also doch aktiv. Wenn du so etwas wie in der anderen Diskussion liest, antworte bitte, sodass man weiß, dass du die Nachricht auch bekommen hast. (;
cyclist789 (2026-07-19 18:44:30+00:00): Vandløbet øst for Skovvej flyder både opad og nedad, så jeg mistænker, at det mere er en skæl-linje gravet mellem Valborup Skov og Storskov.

Jeg sætter flow_direction=unknown eller barrier=forest_boundary på stykker af den.
eggie (2023-01-02 21:47:15+00:00): Dag Edwin... Wanneer er een bord staat Woonerf dan kun je living_street gebruiken.
De wettelijke maxspeed is 15 op een woonerf.
Dus dat graag aanpassen.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-01-02 22:17:26+00:00): maxspeed heb ik aangepast naar 15