piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
stillhart (2026-03-07 10:59:08+00:00): lovely supercharger micro mapping you did here :-)

fyi, chargers can be areas, even relations, these days. the charge points can have now tesla tagging too :-)
LarsBG (2026-03-09 15:54:58+00:00): Thank you. I just added 8 more charge points. Tesla supercharger are groving as time goes !
Frans S (2023-06-05 13:00:14+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:

A: * Multiple buildings have been drawn as 1 building. Each building need to be mapped individually, without connecting nodes.
B: Overlapping buildings drawn.
E: Most buildings are fair rectangular. Square them with the Q key when the object is selected.
* When buildings have L,U shape or protruding elements, they should be included into your mappings.
D: Please avoid that nodes of buildings link to other buildings or roads.
F: Buildings partially hidden under trees not drawn correctly. Extrapolate the rooflines,

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136917339
emersonveenstra (2023-06-04 10:17:37+00:00): Hi,

Can you please explain more about what this is supposed to be? Thanks!
danieldegroot2 (2023-06-03 22:51:41+00:00): oops, has unintended change included. reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136917622
danieldegroot2 (2023-06-03 22:54:03+00:00): (previous changeset included unintended change);
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136917595
mueschel (2023-06-08 16:36:36+00:00): Hi,
could you explain what this node represents? It doesn't have any common tag.
ywanght (2023-06-09 07:57:47+00:00): In Kunming, from December 1st to June 15th of the following year is the forest fire prevention period. The government will arrange people to guard each mountain entrance during this period. In most cases, we will be stopped by these firefighters when passing through these entrances. Therefore, I want to mark these fire prevention checkpoints on the map so that people passing by can know in advance. But I can’t find the corresponding tag in OSM. So I found a similar tag. Can you tell me which tag to use? Thank you.
mueschel (2023-06-12 18:48:04+00:00): Hi,
we do have several different tags for checkpoints, e.g. by police. We also have tags for fire lookouts.
But I think there's nothing for this special case. 

How about some generic tagging and a description:

amenity = checkpoint (used 200 times in various contexts)
access:conditional = yes @ Jun 15 - Nov 30; no @ Dec 01 - Jun 14
description = ... fire prevention ... guard ... no access
operator = XY

Maybe access=private or permit is better depending on the actual situation

Make sure the node is part of the highway so that a router sees the barrier.
ywanght (2023-06-12 22:27:45+00:00): Thank you,I will follow  your  guidance
tolioalessandro (2023-09-04 16:56:38+00:00): Ciao fedc,
vedo che con questo changeset, oltre a ripristinare correttamente la strada come trunk, hai anche modificato tutte le intersezioni della tangenziale di Bassano con la viabilità sottostante, creando nella tangeziale dei micro viadotti ogni volta che essa incrocia un strada ed eliminando il tag tunnel dalla viabilità interferente.

In realtà il criterio sarebbe l'opposto, in quanto le strade sottostanti "bucano" il rilevato della tangenziale. E' vero che il rilevato è artificiale, ma è pur sempre fatto di terreno, la tangenziale non è una strada sorretta da pilastri.

Anche l'altro criterio indicato dalla wiki, ovvero la lunghezza del tratto, conferma che era giusto com'era prima, in quanto il tunnel sulla strada sotto è più lungo del ponte che hai creato sulla strada sopra, quindi si tratta di un tunnel.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:tunnel

Considera anche che così facendo hai creato nella tangenziale, una strada a scorrimento veloce, dei segmenti brevissimi ad ogni intersezione (anzichè un lungo segmento tunnel nella strada interferente com'era prima). I segmenti brevissimi possono dare problemi nella navigazione. 
Probabilmente è per questo che la wiki suggerisce di guardare la lunghezza del tratto.

Ti prego di riportare la situazione com'era prima.

Grazie del tempo che dedichi a migliorare le mappe di OpenStreetMap.

Alessandro
maraf24 (2023-06-06 14:01:59+00:00): Zmieniłeś tu kategorię drogi na leśna/polną
W jaki sposób wiec teraz dojeżdza się do przedszkola? 
Dodatkowo komentarz zestawu dotyczy nawierzchni, ale zmieniła się tylko kategoria. Jaki był cel edycji?
Mirosław Żylewicz (2023-06-07 21:11:23+00:00): Jutro jak tylko będę miał chwilę to zrobię zdjęcia i zamieszczę w komentarzu.

Za przedszkolem w stronę boiska są już tylko drogi polne.

Za przedszkolem jest znak "zakaz wjazdu" więc nie dojedziesz tą drogą do "Boiska Kominiarska".

Dojazd do przedszkola jest od strony Osiedla Lawendowego. Prawdopodobnie można tam też dojechać drogą pomiędzy budową osiedla Cynamonowa Vita oraz budową zespołu szkół (nie widziałem zakazu wjazdu).

Między ulicą melisową a budynkiem 62c jest kolejna droga polna ze znakiem "teren prywatny / zakaz wjazdu". Dojazd do budynku jest od strony ul. Kominiarskiej.
Mirosław Żylewicz (2023-06-07 21:18:17+00:00): Dojazd do domów przy ulicy melisowej odbywa się po drodze polnej/leśnej utwardzonej z koleinami. Nie ma tam żadnej nawierzchni. Pozostała część drogi melisowej to piaszczysta droga polna.
Mirosław Żylewicz (2023-06-07 21:51:51+00:00): Cel edycji? Jak zawsze. Poprawa mapy. W tym konkretnym przypadku wskazanie nawigacjom aby nie kierowały ruchu przez wspomniany odcinek drogi.
maraf24 (2023-06-09 15:47:42+00:00): "Dojazd do przedszkola jest od strony Osiedla Lawendowego. "

Tam jest przecież szlaban.

Pytałem się, bo droga do przedszkola nie powinna być trackiem, a nie był wtedy jeszcze zaznaczony dojazd przez Kaparową.
aTarom (2023-06-04 06:58:38+00:00): Hola ydubras, gracias por editar, me puedes ayudar con el tag
"operator:brand"="es:Correos (España)"
en
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10949977499/history
al ser la primera vez que lo veo, es para confirmar que no se trata de un error y tenerlo en cuenta en siguientes revisiones de tags nuevos que aparecen.
Gracias de nuevo por editar, saludos cordiales
ydubras (2023-06-05 08:51:01+00:00): ¡Hola! Ese tag es un error mío, no debería tener "es:". Ya lo corrijo.
user_18305684 (2023-06-05 14:35:13+00:00): Hi,

Why did you add the tag pipeline to the building ?

Best regards
maraf24 (2023-06-04 21:38:11+00:00): Hej.
Czy to edytor iD chce, by dodawać te znaczniki?
Bo tutaj były one akurat zbędne, te informacje były już w innym tagu.
maraf24 (2023-06-04 21:41:23+00:00): Zaś w dwóch przypadkach, gdy stałyby się one przydatne, zabrakło szczegółów, jak w https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3898783200
Lepiej by było
crossing:markings=zebra, bo to informacja, której wcześniej nie było w danych.
Mirosław Żylewicz (2023-06-05 21:42:16+00:00): Cześć.
Było dokładnie tak jak piszesz.

Podczas sprawdzania błędów, edytor iD znalazł problemy z brakującymi znacznikami oraz punktami, które są zbyt blisko siebie.

Sam byłe odrobinę zdziwiony ale po analizie danych, sugestie o brakujących tagach wydawały się logiczne.

Z czasem niektóre tagi staja się przestarzałe a w ich miejsce powstają nowe.

Co proponujesz? Ignorować te ostrzeżenia?


PS
Na "Osiedlu Lawendowym" popełniłem kilka błędów z tworzeniem części budynku. Zresztą nie tylko ja popełniłem błędy.

W skrócie, dachy budynków są źle otagowane. Zajmę się tym wkrótce.
Kees 59 (2026-03-18 08:48:21+00:00): Sorry for the late call.

Bit of a strange value for socket:tesla_supercharger:output 	(@) here?
Side note: key has been changed to socket:nacs:output in a later edit but the value was kept.

P.S. Most Tesla operated superchargers seem to be named "Tesla Supercharger".
treestryder (2026-03-19 01:12:22+00:00): <shrug>
The output was likely fat fingered.

I must have been in a hurry, because at the time the practice was to use the official name of the Supercharger, "New Springfield, OH - Mahoning Valley Service Plaza" in this case (https://www.tesla.com/findus/location/supercharger/18684), and I didn't take the time to look it up.

Interesting that the recent import/update didn't overwrite either.
osmuser63783 (2024-10-31 23:38:16+00:00): Hi, thanks for adding sac_scale ratings here, could you please have a look at the note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4502255?

Thanks!
FraukeLeo (2024-10-14 19:38:37+00:00): Hallo mp747474, nichts gegen Parkplatz verbessern, aber die Zufahrt zu einem Parkplatz sowie der "Hauptweg" darüber sind _kein_ service=parking_aisle. Nur die kleinen Gassen, die davon abzweigen und zur Parkposition führen, sind Parkgassen. Siehe Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:service%3Dparking_aisle
Mingwei (2023-06-09 22:47:06+00:00): Most of these road class changes seem straight up wrong
user_5359 (2023-06-06 06:18:58+00:00): Hello! Please take a look on http://www.osm.org/way/285596065 (one of five objects). What is the mean of the tags
ID1 = 567
NOME_AREA = PRAÇA PASTOR NESTOR FELIPE RODRIGUES
TIPO = PRACA
By the way: What is the difference between source and source:name.?
IgorEliezer (2023-06-06 18:34:16+00:00): It was tags from a manual copy-paste from open data of the cityhall that I forgot to remove. 'NOME_AREA=*'is 'name=*' and 'TIPO = PRACA' is leisure=park. Now fixed. Thanks for letting me know.
As to the difference between source and source:name:
'source' is the general tag to cite the source applied to all aspects of the feature, both the geometry and the tags.
'source:name' is the tag to cite the source of the name *only*.
I use both tags to say that the source of an object is from a certain entity or doc except the name, which is from elsewhere.
Ong Kai Jin (2023-06-06 10:19:27+00:00): Thanks
Diacritic (2023-06-04 06:33:54+00:00): Hello,

OpenStreetMap is for mapping things that exist in the real world. These edits have been reverted.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136919446
Frans S (2023-06-16 13:15:49+00:00): A new Mapper ! Welcome to this project.
Please solve the issues mentioned on the issue triangle before you upload your mapping.
You connected nodes of a highway to other features, like buildings.
Please don't do that. These are errors.
In practice, you will never see a road ending in a building.
Best regards and keep mapping
eggie (2023-06-04 05:09:58+00:00): Dag Frank Ik zie hier nogal wat schade aan de kaart. Vermoedelijk door schuiven met de kaart in editmodus.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=136919965

Waarom adresnode addr:city	Zaandam	Zaandam
addr:housenumber	7D-7	7D-7
addr:postcode	1506RZ	1506RZ
addr:street	Symon Spiersweg ergens in het water gelegd. en adresnode addr:city	Westzaan	
addr:housenumber	29	
addr:postcode	1551ND	
addr:street	Fokkemast verwijderd.
Als een bedrijf verdwijnt zal het adres toch blijven bestaan.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-06-04 05:18:55+00:00): schade hersteld.
Frank Stengewis1 (2023-06-04 12:27:11+00:00): Excuus, en hartelijk dank voor de tip en het herstel.
eggie (2023-06-04 12:51:21+00:00): No problem Frank.
Het komt door het schuiven
Dan selecteer je onbewust een node met de linkermuisknop en ga je schuiven met diezelfde muisknop.
Je ziet het steeds bij editor iD.
Bij editor josm schuif je met de rechtermuis.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-06-04 05:11:20+00:00): Probeer plakken te voorkomen
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=136920018
user_13006008 (2023-06-04 12:43:35+00:00): Izin menyampaikan pesan dari salah satu anggota komunitas OSM Indonesia untuk Grab :

https://t.me/osmindonesia/3842
user_5359 (2023-06-08 05:49:11+00:00): Hello! Please have a look at https://www.osm.org/node/10951091823. You don't need the key lat and lon because it is the (basic) information of the node.
MxxCon (2023-06-04 18:30:20+00:00): Is this path accurate?
Looking at street imagery from Sept 2022 it looks like totally impassable overgrown area
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136920976
hdevine825 (2023-06-04 19:52:30+00:00): It was easily passable on April 16th, maybe it is seasonal?
MxxCon (2023-06-05 04:30:56+00:00): maybe it's just somebody's lot and they mow it whenever..
Map Fixer (2023-06-19 05:15:28+00:00): Ignore the note, I fixed Kabalangasan Creek its ways since the creek wasnt supposed to go on a straight line.
Arlo James Barnes (2023-06-11 07:49:52+00:00): https://forum.inaturalist.org/t/here-are-pics-of-a-megafauna-rubbing-site/40367
Kovirii (2023-06-17 07:52:45+00:00): Cool!
Taya_S (2023-06-05 06:12:07+00:00): Source is hier voornamelijk Mapillary. Vergeten toe te voegen
Yunan973 (2023-07-28 22:24:02+00:00): Hi,

is it normal that, in the relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14988683, all the relations with the role "part" are empty (no member) ?
Should we delete them or do you need them for later ?

Best regards
Pan (2023-07-28 23:35:04+00:00): Thanks for your message. I suspect a mistake from my part. I would need to look at it but I suppose that my intention was to make a building relation with all the part and made some mistakes.
9_tab (2026-03-27 12:05:06+00:00): The following don't map the roof of the building, ways would be needed too:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14988678
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14988679
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14988680
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14988681
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14988682
HBanu (2024-06-20 17:30:43+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136922257
habi (2023-11-19 15:41:12+00:00): Ciao HUBERT Thomas

Ich war heute grad hier zu Fuss unterwegs.
Aus meiner Sicht ist nirgends mehr etwas von der Spiezer Verbindungsbahn zu sehen.
Aus meiner Sicht gehört diese Bahn nichtmal als ‘railway=abandoned` hierhin, weil  dies laut Wiki eine “Abgebaute aber noch erkennbare Bahnstrecke ohne Schienen” wäre (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:railway%3Dabandoned).
Weisst du von wann bis wann die Bahn da war, dann könnte das Ding in die OpenHistoricalMap verschoben werden.
Gruss,
Habi
Yunan973 (2023-07-28 22:31:50+00:00): Same question for the relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15025423 (see changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136922168)
printzell (2023-06-04 07:08:19+00:00): I submitted the wrong description and source for this. Based on local knowledge.
Ruben Van de Velde (2023-06-09 12:14:26+00:00): Fietspad langs zuidzijde rondpunt / P+R is tijdelijk tweerichtingsverkeer. Heb aangepast.
pitscheplatsch (2023-06-04 10:50:04+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136924118
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-06-10 09:47:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 137165579 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136621326
literan (2023-06-05 21:03:11+00:00): не надо мусорить
Swic (2023-11-21 11:37:03+00:00): Salut Pyrog, pourquoi le chemin 431906956 est privé s'il est emprunté par le GR 34 ? Merci :)
masmoek (2023-10-28 04:18:16+00:00): ini buat apa bro?
pitscheplatsch (2023-06-04 10:50:11+00:00): revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136922930
eggie (2023-06-04 10:11:18+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
DaveF (2023-06-05 11:08:48+00:00): Hi
On the premise 'OSM shouldn't be a database dump', what is the purpose of your additions such as heritage & heritage:operator?
Bergischer (2023-06-05 13:35:29+00:00): Hi!

However, OSM does have a section for heritage. Please look over here:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Historical_Objects/Map_Properties#Gebaeude

oder here: 

https://gk.historic.place/historische_objekte/l/en/index.html
LudovicG (2023-10-18 11:57:57+00:00): On pouvait laisser le contact:housenumber sur feu le UpperBurger non ?
Glassman (2023-06-04 21:01:04+00:00): #TIP: sidewalks in OSM are footways that are next to a road. OSM started in England so we use British English for the tags and English's terms for roads and other features.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136924660
LockOnGuy (2023-06-04 09:04:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully in changeset 136925365 and the changeset comment is: Revert changeset 136924915 when a mapper edited the map with old images and made intersection in the middle of a motorway!
Eman Ghareeb (2023-06-04 11:37:37+00:00): Thank you for noticed that.
eggie (2023-06-04 10:13:49+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
access private heb ik verwijderd buiten het hek. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
amadvance (2023-06-04 14:01:38+00:00): Ciao Paolo,
Intendi che è franato ?

Comunque ho rispristinato il tag highway=path dato che con cliff si intende una cosa diversa.

Se il sentiero è completamente inagibile,  va marcato in altri modi. 

Comunque da Strava si vede che è stato abbastanza frequentato negli ultimi due anni. Direi che quindi esiste ancora a meno di problemi recenti.

L'incremento della difficoltà ad Alpine Hiking dovrebbe essere sufficiente.

Qua trovi delle foto per comparazione per la difficoltà: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sac_scale

Ciao,
Andrea
eggie (2023-06-04 10:17:11+00:00): Dag nicotro.. Wanneer geen bordje art 461 wvs oid is geplaatst dan niet een weg op slot zetten. 
Je zou voorlopig motor_vehicle=permissive kunnen taggen bij eigen terrein. 
MVG
eggie
user_12523467 (2023-06-04 15:37:58+00:00): so one of your colleague in  #digitalegypt add those links here :https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131185930

then you came back and deleted them, so what is going on, aren't you the same team?
user_12523467 (2023-06-04 15:39:32+00:00): and please revert your edits, it does not reflect the local streets design.
Eman Ghareeb (2023-06-05 06:36:04+00:00): Hello Lamassu;
Thank you for noticing that these links it were removed by mistake and I revert it now.
Regards
Eman Ghareeb
eggie (2023-06-04 10:20:44+00:00): Dag nicotro

Zouden die wandelpaden echt kloppen zo?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-06-04 10:24:22+00:00): Ik heb die wandelpaden bijgewerkt volgens de laatste pdok latest 2023
Dat pad dat de speeltuin inloopt zie ik ook niet op de luchtfoto.
Up to you
eggie
nicotro (2023-06-04 10:28:40+00:00): Had volgens mij alleen de speelplaats aangepast. De wandelpaden lijken op deze manier beter, maar zal nog iets aanpassen o.b.v. definitief ontwerp (https://doemee.leiden.nl/nl-NL/projects/beethovenpark/6). Dit correspondeert met de werkelijke situatie.
eggie (2023-06-04 10:35:47+00:00): Oke top!
Veel plezier met mappen.
Groet
eggie
HikeAndMap (2023-07-05 22:18:32+00:00): Please keep the bounding boxes for your uploads smaller if possible.

Example:
map within a city and upload your changes
map within a province and upload you changes

first after uploaded - move on to the next city/province.

Thank you for your considerations
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136925669
eggie (2023-06-04 10:25:58+00:00): Tip.. Probeer die laadpalen los te houden van de voetpaden en wegen .
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=136925726

MVG
eggie
Carto'Cité (2023-09-21 14:29:54+00:00): Bonjour lefuturiste,
Tu as bien fait de déclasser cet aménagement qui n'est effectivement pas une piste cyclable : 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/910864894
Je me permets de le mettre ne path plutôt que footway car c'est plus conforme à la pratique de réserver les footway pour les aménagement explicitement piétons tels que les trottoirs ou les chemins avec un panneau B22a.
Je reste à ta disposition si tu as la moindre question.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #VeloNormandie
lefuturiste (2023-09-21 15:54:33+00:00): Ah oui effectivement c'est très bien, merci !
Carto'Cité (2023-09-21 16:23:18+00:00): Merci pour ton retour 🙂
Charles
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-27 13:50:50+00:00): Thank you for mapping. The mapping looks great and also the changeset comment. But the mapping has some invalid tag modification. Please resolve the issue. Happy Mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136926476
LockOnGuy (2023-06-04 10:45:38+00:00): Thank you! great job!
jcr83 (2023-06-04 19:14:03+00:00): Hi,
Why did you remove the russian and japanese names of Biot, and the source of the occitan name ?
jcr83 (2023-06-04 19:19:39+00:00): BTW, why did you update a restaurant that is closed since 2020?
DaanLT (2023-06-04 12:32:33+00:00): pakeitimas neatitinka situacijos, buvo beveik gerai viskas sužymėta prieš tai:
https://erdvinis.vilnius.lt/?d=0&l=-1&r=0&z=19&x=2817543.079949769&y=7294638.359037351&poz=3343397.74,1581160.85,5179327.70,-0.5230,-0.2473,-0.8157,-0.7374,-0.3487,0.5785,-0.4275,0.9040,0.0000&k=orto&akLay=empty
Pakeitimą atšauksiu
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-06-04 10:44:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 136927476 where the changeset comment is: See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7169
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-06-04 10:09:19+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 136802073, 136802087.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-06-04 10:44:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 136927476 where the changeset comment is: See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7169
ivanbranco (2023-08-03 10:38:38+00:00): Ciao CorAgo,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/346215528/history
qua hai aggiunto cai_scale a una way, ma andrebbe utilizzato solo sulle relazioni
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-06-04 10:45:00+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 136927141, 136927163, 136927181, 136927284.
Enock4seth (2023-06-04 18:09:52+00:00): Don't just move features to align with Bing Imagery as there's an offset with the imagery instead and that needs to be fixed by aligning it to existing data.

This can be guided by GPS traces collected by yourself and/or other contributors.
Robert Whittaker (2023-09-18 13:36:30+00:00): Hi mintsoft,

You've tagged the building/store https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15949142 that you added in this changeset with both "Iceland" and "Lidl" information, but only given it the name "Lidl" Is this some sort of single combined store, or are there two separate stores? If so, it would be better to map them as two separate OSM objects.

Equally, if one is a concession within the other store, then it would still be better to have two separate OSM objects.

Also, I'm a bit curious as to why you've used a multipolygon for the store building here. Perhaps the previous combining of the Lidl and Iceland stores from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/199077828/history and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/199077829/history was done by accident.

Could you have a look and see if the mapping needs adjusting?
mintsoft (2023-09-18 13:42:59+00:00): Hiya,

This used to be 2 stores (an Iceland and a Lidl), about 4 years ago the Iceland shut down and the Lidl expanded into the space. There should only be one building (which is very oddly shaped) which is now Lidl.

WRT to the multipolygon, I think that was probably the effect of me using BuildingTools to combine the shape into one without realising that's not the same thing as a single polygon. 

I think the best option is to probably trace this as a single building/polygon with just the Lidl in it, unless there's a quick and easy way to convert that into a polygon?