piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-17 08:58:53+00:00): As a gift, I will correct the current form of the phone number to the correct type.
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-17 09:05:47+00:00): You can also modify your working hours in a more detailed way and improve your recording.
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-17 22:13:09+00:00): @masoudghorbany
You have incompleted the name of the operator in changeset 178673320. Even though I had modified the name tag, you again changed the changeset to 178670826, 178671058, 178671110, 178679554, 178673226, 178670009, 178673092, 178673059, 178672997, 178672902, 178672856, 178672902, 178672819, 178668353, 178672325, 178670726, 178670646, 178670548, 178670427, 178670308, 178670112 and 178669930
You have added the branch tag which is correct but you have acted against the rules in the title tag. Stop this. Repeating a wrong action means sabotage. Even though you have been instructed about this, you are still repeating it. Your lack of attention will be noticed by the inspection team.
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-18 08:18:17+00:00): And again, in changeset 178707284, you have returned the same incorrect record.
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-18 21:26:54+00:00): @masoudghorbany
You have incompleted the name of the operator in changeset/178673320
In change set 178719429 you have drawn a building area as an island and separate from the adjacent building. It is good to record the building area, but it must be according to OSM rules and instructions.
In change set 178720490 you have made a major change to the entire country and have edited 10 stores from different regions of the country in the name tag for the first time, contrary to the rules.
. Even though I had modified the name tag, you again changed the changeset to 178670826, 178671058, 178671110, 178679554, 178673226, 178670009, 178673092, 178673059, 178672997, 178672902, 178672856, 178672902, 178672819, 178668353, 178672325, 178670726, 178670646, 178670548, 178670427, 178670308, 178670112 , 178669930, 178707284, 178721809, 178719611, 178720632, 178720490
, 178713807, 178713572, 178713486
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-19 20:27:18+00:00): In your action today, you made a large edit in Change set 178768666 in the whole country of Iran and an edit in 178781378 in the city of Ahvaz, both of which were mistakes. Your actions have been corrected. Each time you repeat these edits by ignoring the rules, they will be reverted.
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-20 15:22:08+00:00): @masoudghorbany
In addition to the previous incorrect changes, you have also made a major change in a new change set numbered 178821042. These changes were incorrect on a large scale across Iran. Proceed according to the rules.
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-21 15:45:25+00:00): @masoudghorbany
Today you have also committed widespread vandalism for businesses that have already been fixed. They were in two change sets with numbers 178847700 and 178847935. Editing at will causes chaos. Stop this. Registration and editing are for everyone according to certain rules.
kingkingHK (2026-02-21 05:54:40+00:00): What's the purpose of `bicycle:pushing=`? Isn't it already implied by `bicycle=no`? (because of pushing is allowed it would be `bicycle=dismount`)
Kovoschiz (2026-02-21 10:20:37+00:00): You can read the wiki, or the post https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/solving-the-dreaded-access-dismount-problem/134288
Langlaeufer (2026-02-22 10:45:43+00:00): sidewalk:right=separate war schon richtig. Der Gehweg ist separat erfasst.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178666410
qstep (2026-02-17 09:34:15+00:00): Üdv az OpenStreetMap-en! Az általad megadott building:levels=0 azt jelenti, nincs szintje a háznak. Valószínűleg inkább 1-re gondoltál. Bővebben: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:levels

További jó térképezést!
bkil (2026-02-17 10:52:15+00:00): Mi van, ha lifecycle helyett gondolt erre a szerző, hogy lebontották?
NeisBot (2026-02-17 08:54:42+00:00): Hello GeoffMarshallFan_09, welcome to OSM, and thank you for your contributions!

I've taken a look at your recent edits and wanted to discuss a few discrepancies I noticed regarding the surrounding environmental features. Specifically, the locations in your edits don't seem to align with the typical geographical characteristics expected in that area. Here are some (max 10) relevant links to the edits:
https://osm.org/way/1479535445

Could you please take a look?
Looking forward to your response.

#Somewhere
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178666651
Taya_S (2026-02-17 09:07:50+00:00): Please see: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19798
Taya_S (2026-02-17 09:08:06+00:00): Reverted fantasy edits

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178667225
NeisBot (2026-02-17 09:03:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 10 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1274495554 v4 | 5 crossings
https://osm.org/way/87316237 v25 | 5 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/1855656972 v8

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178666930
NeisReview (2026-02-25 17:33:10+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/178669841
NeisBot (2026-02-17 09:18:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13572100569 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Cabinetry store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-25 17:33:06+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179048459
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
canfe (2026-04-24 07:01:49+00:00): Non bisogna usare i tag dei civici e mischiarli con quelli dei servizi.
Ho separato e corretto il numero telefonico che non ha il +39
NeisBot (2026-02-17 09:36:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13572351389 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Clothing store"
---
Till exempel kunde en mer neutral och saklig version av din text vara: "Klädbutik"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-02-25 17:33:07+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/178669254
Frans S (2026-02-21 16:22:12+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please do not cluster buildings. Each building needs to be mapped individually.
Best regards
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-18 05:22:46+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2347728915

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-04-10 09:32:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 181135570 where the changeset comment is: Reverting alleged locksmith scam businesses.  See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/allegedly-fake-locksmiths/142942
vasony (2026-02-19 09:22:12+00:00): Szia!

Szerintem nem túl jó ötlet a residential-t unclassifiedra tenni, de matrixon kifejtheted ha szerinted még is.

Tamás
gabro00 (2026-02-19 09:33:37+00:00): Szia Tamás!
Nem látom az üzenetedben miért nem jó ötlet, kifejtenéd? :)
Gábor
vasony-qa (2026-02-19 16:29:28+00:00): Szia!

Ok, ha itt akarod, ide írom:
Mert nem felel meg az unclassified definiciónak.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dunclassified

Unlike residential and track, they are generally outside of residential areas and are not primarily used for agriculture. They can connect small hamlets; remote industry such as power plants or oil fields; wilderness areas; minor ski centers; and similar features requiring infrequent car access.

Ahogy írja, az unclassified egy alsóbb rendű, területeket összekötő út, és jellemzően városon kívűl. 
Ez meg itt egy lakott terület, teli házzal az út mentén.

De belinkelhetem a magyar oldalt is:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hungary/F%C5%91%C3%BAt#highway_c%C3%ADmke_%C3%A9rt%C3%A9kei

unclassified 	külterületi közutak 	belterületen nem jellemző a használata, csak a külterületi közutak belterületre benyúló szakaszán 

Tamás
gabro00 (2026-02-20 06:26:42+00:00): Ok, köszi. Most nincs időm se átfutni, se újat linkelni, amiből világossá válna.

Ehelyett a kérdésem: hogyan jelölnéd azokat az *átmenő forgalmat* bonyolító utakat, amik nem tertiary besorolásúak? Mert most a tertiary az a Rókusi körút; ehhez képest a Híd utca, Széchenyi tér szerintem nem az, és még csak nem is lakóút.
vasony (2026-02-20 19:56:42+00:00): Ahogy látom a secondary szint majdnem teljesen hiányzik.
Szerintem fel kell tenni a Rókusi körút és társait secondary szintre és a gyűjtőút jellegű utakat, mint a Híd utca és Széchenyi tér pedig tertiaryra.

Van 3 kiemeltebb szintünk (primary, secondary, tertiary), ezzel csak be lehet sorolni a főbb utakat egymáshoz képest, és a véleményem, hogy most felejtsük az el, egy ekkora városnál hogy a 4 számjegyű utak bevezető szakaszai lehetnek csak secondary besorolásúak.
gabro00 (2026-02-21 07:06:26+00:00): Így van, ez most hiányzik. Viszont ha visszanézed az utak előzményét, volt...
Egyébként ok, ezzel tudok azonosulni, magam is kb. így csinálnám. Nem én ragaszkodok ehhez a 4 számjegyű utasdihoz :)

Ami viszont szerintem nem fér a három kategóriába, azok az olyan utak, mint pl. a Szent Gellért utca (szinte csak buszok használják), Veres ács utca (átmenő forgalom, de sokszor csak egy sávos, mert leparkolják az út szélét - nézd meg StreetView-n). Tehát az áteresztőképességük olyan, mint egy alacsony sebkorlátozású lakúútnak. Én ezeken meghagynám az unclassified címkét.

Elkezdem logikusan átcímkézni, egyelőre csak max. secondary szinten, aztán meglátom milyen finomítás kell még. 1-2 hét múlva térjünk vissza rá. Ezt meg csak itt hagyom: https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_valhalla_car&route=46.26477%2C20.121779%3B46.27375%2C20.16141#map=15/46.26758/20.14751
divaddivag (2026-02-18 05:24:14+00:00): C'est cool merci, je pensais ajouter:
wikimedia_commons=File:Station epuration littoral-2-SteHonorineDesPertes.jpg
start_date=2025-10-20
name=Station de traitement des eaux usées du littoral

Reste plus qu'à demander un petit coup main de Koreller pour la faire en 3D! Cheers!
ZekOwney (2026-02-18 10:37:17+00:00): Oh nice idea !
Je peux bien fournir 2-3 photos intérieures du site pour la contribution 3D (mais pas mettre en public par contre).
Complètes donc avec ses tags. avec plaisir :)
arjunaraoc (2026-02-22 00:12:16+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Reverted already
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178669703
Filip009 (2026-02-21 07:09:23+00:00): Ahoj, podľa popisu sa tam stále nachádzajú náhrobné kamene https://www.esjf-cemeteries.org/survey/brezova-pod-bradlom-jewish-cemetery/. Nemyslím si preto, že by to malo byť abandoned.
Filip009CZ (2026-02-21 07:10:58+00:00): Aké sú tvoje argumenty, prečo by to malo byť abandoned?
mapperue (2026-02-21 12:34:51+00:00): Ahoj, značku abandoned používam podľa https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:abandoned:*
napr. abandoned:building alebo abandoned:highway - objekty sú v teréne stále rozpoznateľné a dá sa určiť účel, na ktorý boli využívané, ale aby sa mohli opäť používať, je potrebná rozsiahla rekonštrukcia.
Ešte sa používa aj značka historic=cemetery, ktorá by bola vhodná pre podobné cintoríny.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic=cemetery
Filip009 (2026-02-21 12:39:30+00:00): Možno by bolo vhodnejšie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:abandoned%3Dyes, keďže pri použití abandoned life cycle prefix to žiadny renderer nezobrazuje a je to významný krajinný prvok?
mapperue (2026-02-26 06:15:39+00:00): O niečo viac sa používa kombinácia s abandoned=yes, takže aj tu zmením značenie.
Filip009 (2026-02-26 07:36:20+00:00): Začal som aj diskusiu https://groups.google.com/g/osm_sk/c/C98qOLirfnI a padli tam zaujímavé návrhy.
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-17 22:07:47+00:00): @masoudghorbany
I have also given you the same advice about the name tag in the Zabol branch, but again in the change sets and 178670826 and 178671058 and 178671110 and 178679554 and 178673226 and 178670009 and 178673092 and 178673059 and 178672997 and 178672902 and 178672856 and 178672902 and 178672819 and 178668353 and 178672325 and 178670726 and 178670646 and 178670548 and 178670427 and You have caused incorrect registrations 178670308, 178670112, and 178669930. Stop doing this.
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-17 22:05:35+00:00): @masoudghorbany
A similar thing happened in Zahedan branch and I have again advised you about the name tag but again in the change sets and 178670826 and 178671058 and 178671110 and 178679554 and 178673226 and 178670009 and 178673092 and 178673059 and 178672997 and 178672902 and 178672856 and 178672902 and 178672819 and 178668353 and 178672325 and 178670726 and 178670646 and 178670548 and 178670427, 178670308, and 178670112 have caused incorrect registration. Stop doing this.
NeisBot (2026-02-17 10:03:49+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13572473677 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Hair salon"
---
Zum Beispiel könnte eine neutralere und sachlichere Version deines Textes lauten: "Friseursalon"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
pitscheplatsch (2026-02-17 10:28:27+00:00): Hi, willkommen bei OSM und vielen Dank für den Eintrag.

Könnte der Instagram Account in den dafür vorgesehenen Bereich eintragen werden? Aktuell ist es in der Beschreibung des Eintrags.

Danke und viele Grüße,
Pascal
QuangTheThien (2026-02-17 11:43:44+00:00): Hi Pascal, hab ich gemacht :)
LG Quang
pitscheplatsch (2026-02-17 11:46:07+00:00): Perfekt! Vielen lieben Dank.
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-17 22:03:16+00:00): @masoudghorbany
I have already corrected the Kerman branch and have given you guidance about the name tag, but still in the changesets and 178670826 and 178671058 and 178671110 and 178679554 and 178673226 and 178670009 and 178673092 and 178673059 and 178672997 and 178672902 and 178672856 and 178672902 and 178672819 and 178668353 and 178672325 and 178670726 and 178670646 and 178670548 and 178670427 and 178670308 and 178670112 have caused incorrect registration. Stop doing this.
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-17 21:52:57+00:00): @masoudghorbany
You have edited a lot of tags that are not correct
I have already corrected the Mashhad branch and advised you not to use multiple separate tags in the name tag, but again in changesets 178670826, 178671058, 178671110, 178679554, 178673226, 178670009, 178673092, 178673059, 178672997, 13399666412, 178672856, 178672902, 13410044356, 178668353, 178672325, 178670726, 178670646, 178670548, and 178670427 have caused incorrect registration.
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-17 21:49:56+00:00): @masoudghorbany
You have edited a lot of tags that are not correct
I have already corrected the Bushehr branch and advised you not to use multiple separate tags in the name tag, but still in changesets 178670826, 178671058, 178671110, 178679554, 178673226, 178670009, 178673092, 178673059, 178672997, 13399666412, 178672856, 178672902, 13410044356, 178668353, 178672325, 178670726, 178670646 and 178670548 have caused incorrect registration.
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-17 21:44:13+00:00): @masoudghorbany
Don't keep doing this, we can't fill the map as we want, we have to follow the rules
I've already corrected this and advised you not to use multiple separate tags in the name tag, but still in changesets 178670826, 178671058, 178671110, 178679554, 178673226, 178670009, 178673092, 178673059, 178672997, 13399666412, 178672856, 178672902, 13410044356, 178668353, 178672325, 178670726 You did not enter the name tag correctly.
Rainero (2026-03-15 10:49:18+00:00): Revert mit changeset/179891772
(unzulässige Quelle)
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-17 21:39:45+00:00): @masoudghorbany
I have already corrected the central branch node and advised you not to use multiple separate tags in the name tag, but still in changesets 178670826, 178671058, 178671110, 178679554, 178673226, 178670009, 178673092, 178673059, 178672997, 13399666412, 178672856, 178672902, 13410044356, 178668353, and 178672325 you did not enter the name tag correctly. Stop doing this. Doing this in large numbers will mean you are sabotaged.
notmyproblem1 (2026-02-18 21:31:23+00:00): oh thanks
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-17 21:34:00+00:00): @masoudghorbany
I have already corrected this node and advised you not to use multiple separate tags in the name tag, but still in changesets 178671058, 178671110, 178679554, 178673226, 178670009, 178673092, 178673059, 178672997, 13399666412, 178672856, 178672902, 13410044356, 178668353, and 178672325 you did not enter the name tag correctly. Stop doing this. Doing this in large numbers will mean sabotage.
rarad74 (2026-02-17 12:38:19+00:00): Hi. Please do not mpove object using Bing Maps because are older than 10 years. Mapbox are the newest and seccond ESRI Standard.
AndyB_66 (2026-02-17 18:25:43+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-17 21:30:47+00:00): @masoudghorbany
Although you have already been guided about the correct principles in registering name tags, you still did not enter the name tags correctly in changesets 178671058, 178671110, 178679554, 178673226, 178670009, 178673092, 178673059, 178672997, 13399666412, 178672856, 178672902, 13410044356, 178668353, and 178672325. Stop this. Doing this in large numbers will mean sabotage on your part.
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-17 21:27:11+00:00): @masoudghorbany
You did not edit the name tag correctly in changesets 178671110, 178679554, 178673226, 178670009, 178673092, 178673059, 178672997, 13399666412, 178672856, 178672902, 13410044356, 178668353, and 178672325. This is not in accordance with osm rules. Stop it. Doing this in large numbers will mean user sabotage.
NeisBot (2026-02-17 10:33:47+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/6206216687 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Wedding venue"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-17 10:46:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/178672328
where the comment is: "Remove spam"
NeisBot (2026-02-17 10:33:49+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/6206773504 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Wedding venue"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-17 10:46:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/178672350
where the comment is: "Remove spam"
Szymson (2026-02-17 16:53:43+00:00): Błędnie określony tag "operator=", błędnie określony typ obiektu - zamiast "shop=photo" powinno być "craft=photographer"
NeisBot (2026-02-17 10:46:32+00:00): 🌍 Welcome to OSM, HARI k.
Thanks for contributing!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

✅ Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added service roads with asphalt surfaces, oneway directions, and bus routes"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish
Szymson (2026-02-17 16:51:56+00:00): Błędnie określony tag "operator=", błędnie określony typ obiektu - zamiast "shop=photo" powinno być "craft=photographer"
Szymson (2026-02-17 16:43:41+00:00): Było dobrze, to trzeba było zepsuć. Tag "operator=" nie służy do zamieszczania w nim laurek reklamowych dla swojej firmy. Przed dalszymi edycjami polecam lekturę:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/chce-dodac-swoja-firme-do-mapy-w-osm-watek-ogolny/135487
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-17 21:20:50+00:00): @masoudghorbany
I have corrected the name tag in changesets 178668353 and 178698677. This is done according to osm rules. Stop doing this. Doing this in large numbers will mean user sabotage.
Szymson (2026-02-17 16:45:51+00:00): Błędna edycja. Nieprawidłowy tag "name="
NeisBot (2026-02-17 10:57:39+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 13 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/821759931 v1 | 3 crossings
https://osm.org/way/821759917 v1 | 3 crossings
https://osm.org/way/821758649 v1 | 5 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/7672897917 v2
https://osm.org/node/7672896088 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178672578
bartgron (2026-02-18 14:39:20+00:00): Zestaw zmian został wycofany z powodu rażących błędów:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178729088
Pozdrawiam