piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Martinligabue (2026-02-07 18:25:36+00:00): vedo che hai rimosso anche i tag sul numero di corsie, perché? ora quindi la strada è aperta in entrambe le direzioni, senza corsia riservata in un verso deduco comunque
hypersciocco (2026-02-10 12:29:22+00:00): Ok, ripristino il numero di corsie.
Quel tratto è a doppio senso, almeno da quando hanno aperto la T2, prima non ricordo.
Tjuro (2026-02-26 06:33:39+00:00): hoi RJ-Gouda,

Ik zie dat je bij:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/274018891/history

historic=monument hebt tegevoegd

historic=monument is bedoeld en word gebruikt voor gedenktekens, en monument betekent iets anders in het nederlands.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dmonument

Bedoel je meschien historic=yes?

Met vriendelijke groet,

Tjuro
RJ-Gouda (2026-02-28 12:29:31+00:00): Hi Tjuro,

Ik had mij niet gerealiseerd dat monument een andere betekenis heeft in OpenStreetMap. Historic=yes is dan de juiste tag. 

Met vriendelijke groet
RJ
Colbertson (2026-02-07 19:22:22+00:00): If you press Q you can square buildings to have nice right angles.
Can also right click and do it from the context menu.
Interswd (2026-05-28 21:14:20+00:00): skąd te info o projektowanych elektryfikacjach?
kdpy (2026-06-04 18:07:21+00:00): kolej plus racibórz-głubczyce-racławice śląskie, co ciekawe sieć trakcyjna ma się kończyć w racławicach bo termin elektryfikacji podsudeckiej kędzierzyn-nysa jest nieznany
eggie (2026-02-08 21:26:21+00:00): Oke, maar nu staat het open voor alle verkeer. Is dat wel de bedoeling? 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-02-08 21:27:59+00:00): Maar goed.. De bussluis houdt regulier verkeer tegen.
MVG eggie
eggie (2026-02-08 21:33:07+00:00): accesstags C1 toegevoegd muv bus=yes en emergency=yes
Crashtender (2026-02-08 22:05:00+00:00): Ah, super., ik snapwat ik hier heb gemist. Mijn dank voor de hulp!
george1201 (2026-02-07 19:58:49+00:00): Das Gewässer sollte aber der Waldrelation r3715178 als inner-Mitglied hinzugefügt werden.
george1201 (2026-02-07 21:56:25+00:00): Andererseits: Wenn das Wasser weg ist (intermittent!), dann ist dort wohl Wald. Also ist es irgendwie beides?
gmaass (2026-02-07 22:42:27+00:00): Die Schilffläche und dort wo gerodet wurde, ist jetzt definitiv kein Wald. Im unteren Teil des Rechtecks stehen die Bäume noch und das Wasser reicht bis zu der höher gelegenen Fläche, auf der der Weg verläuft und sich das Straßenbahndepot anschließt. Die Bäume wachsen dort auf einer tieferen Fläche, die unter Wasser steht und sich auf diesem etwa 2 Meter tieferen Niveau mindestens bis zum Schilf im nördlichen Teil des Rechtecks hinzieht. Am rechten Rand des Rechtecks ist eine Böschung von etwa 1,5 Meter Tiefe, dann kommt Schlamm und das Gelände fällt weiter nach Westen ab, wo dann Wasser steht. Weiter links sind wieder Bäume. Wie weit innerhalb dieser Bäume das Wasser geht, kann man von der Böschung aus nicht erkennen. Vor der Rodung war ja alles außer der Schilffläche bewaldet. Das ist jetzt nicht mehr so.
gmaass (2026-02-07 22:46:22+00:00): Rechts vom Rechteck ist gar kein Wald mehr, sondern Wiese mit ein paar angepflanzten Einzelbäumen, was man auch auf dem Satellitenbild schon sieht. Vor etwa 3 Jahren war auch das noch waldartiges Dickicht.
george1201 (2026-02-08 20:01:01+00:00): Die Wiese habe ich nach meiner heutigen Begehung eingetragen. Ein paar Bäume sind darauf auch schon angepflanzt. Könnte mal eine meadow=meadow_orchard werden. Die Umrisse des neuen Gewässers westlich davon sind in der Tat schwer zu erkennen. Dieser Teich wurde wohl erst jüngst ausgehoben. Im Norden steht noch Schilf. Mal schau'n, ob das auch noch weg kommt.
gurglypipe (2026-02-08 13:47:32+00:00): Heya, are you sure this link road is one-way? If so, that would mean the north end of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/42727781 is one-way, but it has a central lane marking and no one-way arrows.

Additionally, I don’t think there’s a no entry sign at the north-eastern end of this link road.

Cheers :)
iMacThere4iAm (2026-02-08 21:11:26+00:00): I think some historical changes have left it unclear. All of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/42727781 was one-way until the offices were built (around 2014?) then the central lane markings were added. As I'm not sure how to interpret the present markings, I'll revert the change.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178284497
gurglypipe (2026-02-08 21:38:15+00:00): Agreed, it is a confusing layout and that’s probably caused by historical changes. Thanks for taking another look at it :)
mueschel (2026-02-12 11:51:30+00:00): Hi,
welcome to OSM.
Please don't add private property items to OSM. Listing the equipment in peoples backyards is not really within the scope of OSM. These things shouldn't be tagged like we also don't tag names of people living in buildings or the number of cars they own.
Glassman (2026-02-08 00:07:32+00:00): Glad to see someone contributing over in the Swinomish Reservation. I'm over in Mount Vernon. I'm trying to find locals that would like to get to gather every now and then. Let me know if you are interested. I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178235208
eggie (2026-02-07 16:33:51+00:00): Hoi,

Positie die de BAG aangeeft is vaak willekeurig. Je kunt gewoon schuiven met de adressen.
MVG
eggie
Frans S (2026-02-07 17:21:25+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she deliver high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
Issues found on your mappings
E: Buildings not squared or rounded.
Tagged a wide highwayt (>6 mtr) as a path! This should be mapped as highway=unclassified or residential.
Do no add fancy names to objects.  just tag the object.
Empty spots, no shadow are mostly no buildings.
Buildings have in general a rectangular or round form.



Explanation can be found in this document which  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
Frans S (2026-02-07 17:22:01+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
You managed to map nearly all highways over already mapped highways.
Didn't you zoom in far enough to see all already mapped objects?
Don't give a road a generic name. Just tag it as highway= ....
Best regards
Frans S (2026-02-07 17:00:52+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178235482
Frans S (2026-02-07 16:54:32+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 
A few issues:
Do not include a yard in your mapping.
You mapped over existing mapped buildings. Be sure to zoom in far enough to see all already mapped objects. ( check the bottom line on your editor)


Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178235707
Frans S (2026-02-07 16:56:21+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and accurately mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178235767
SomeoneElse2 (2026-07-03 14:40:36+00:00): Hello https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Matiz@101 ,
Clearly https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1475062786 is not called "#AfricaMapCup2026".  Please correct it.  The other things that you added here are presumably not named "building".  Please fix those too.
Best Regards,
Andy
Illio (2026-02-17 12:07:10+00:00): Táto cesta (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1475063934) sa podľa novších záberov na danom mieste už nenachádza.
aceman444 (2026-02-22 13:51:50+00:00): Zdravim, co povazujete za novsie zabery? Praveze na novsich (ESRI) sa nachadza. Na Ortofotomozaike nie, ale ta je stara z 2023.
Illio (2026-02-22 19:01:43+00:00): Áno, moja chyba, podľa kvality snímkov som predpokladal, že ide o staršie zábery...
aceman444 (2026-02-22 20:44:22+00:00): Zial ESRI ma na roznych zoomoch rozne stare fotky. Moze to mylit.
Metzor (2026-02-24 21:51:58+00:00): Hallo Kurt,

Haben die Holzkunstwerke wirklich alle ein Namensschild drunter? Daran erinnere ich mich gar nicht...
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen#name_ist_nur_der_Name

Vielleicht subject:wikidata=*

Viele Grüße
Metzor
NeisBot (2026-02-08 09:25:15+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13532409026 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Gabinet masażu"
---
Na przykład, bardziej neutralna i obiektywna wersja Twojego tekstu mogłaby brzmieć: "Gabinet masażu"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-17 05:34:39+00:00): 🗑️🤖 Element deleted by https://osm.org/changeset/178659856

 If you believe this deletion was incorrect or would like to clarify the intent of the original tags, please reply here.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-04-08 15:41:09+00:00): "moim zdaniem brakuje tam placu zabaw" czyli go nie ma?

W OSM mapujemy to co jest
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-04-08 15:43:10+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181056882 - wycofane jako wandalizm i łamanie https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines
Frans S (2026-02-08 10:23:52+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
In general, Inaccurate mapped and wrongly tagged.
please read the info how to map ,

Explanation can be found in this document which  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178237021
eggie (2026-02-07 18:20:07+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback   In OSM Nederland zetten we de info op de adresnode. Dus niet op de gebouwomtrek.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-02-07 18:22:18+00:00): Info verplaatst naar adresnode
SomeoneElse (2026-02-09 11:21:04+00:00): Just wondered is https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20187045 spelt OK? ("d" rather than "t")?
user_7684749 (2026-02-07 17:21:40+00:00): Límites Detallados de la Localidad de Zelaya
1. El Límite Norte: Frontera Natural
Referencia: Río Luján.
Descripción: El río actúa como la frontera física con el Partido de Campana. Es el sector de humedales donde hoy se asienta gran parte del barrio San Sebastián y el área rural de Zelaya. 
2. El Límite Este: Frontera con Escobar (Matheu y Loma Verde)
Desde el río, el límite baja hacia el sur cortando el campo:
Calle Luis Tagle: Es la que marca la división con Loma Verde. Es una zona de quintas.
Calle Apatamas: Siguiendo el trazado hacia el sur, el límite se apoya en esta calle (que es la continuación de Tagle.
Calle Alborada: Al llegar a la zona de Matheu, el límite se define cerca de esta calle, que separa el crecimiento urbano de Escobar del área rural/residencial de Zelaya.
3. El Límite Sur/Oeste: Con Villa Rosa
Aquí es donde el trazado se vuelve más urbano debido al crecimiento de los últimos años, separando a Zelaya de Villa Rosa:
Ruta 25: El límite toca un sector de la ruta y a acceso a industrias y barrios residenciales.
Calle Palma: Desde la Ruta 25, el límite se desvía por la calle Palma, hasta Silverio Basabe.
Calle Silverio Basabe: Esta es la "columna vertebral" del límite sur. Corre por el fondo de los barrios de Pilar del Este. Todo lo que queda al noreste de Basabe es Zelaya enlazando con Palma.
Calle Almirante Brown: Al llegar al sector del Lugar del Milagro, el límite sigue por Brown. Esto deja a la Capilla y el predio histórico dentro de Zelaya y cortando el campo hacia el río Luján, mientras que los barrios cerrados como Santa Elisa, Santa Luisa y Santa Emilia quedan del lado de Villa Rosa.
Bondi Maps (2026-02-08 02:55:49+00:00): De dónde sacaste dicha información? Lo que me dieron de la Municipalidad es diferente.
Bondi Maps (2026-02-08 17:49:19+00:00): Necesito, porfavor, que me pases las fuentes que estás utilizando. Sino voy a tener que revertir los cambios por no ser actuales.
Hb- (2026-04-04 09:44:35+00:00): Wieso wurde für dieses Haus way/477934994 eine Adresse eingetragen, obwohl sich im Haus schon der Adresspunkt node/7280287404 befindet?
Syl (2026-02-13 13:49:32+00:00): Bonjour, vous avez ajouté des jardins en double alors qu'ils existaient déjà : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1475070576 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/569691117

Pouvez-vous corriger ?

Merci pour vos contributions, bonne journée.
Fanfanfois (2026-02-13 17:26:09+00:00): Bonjour. En effet, erreur de ma part. C'est corrigé. Bonne fin de journée.
Frans S (2026-02-08 10:27:06+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178237953
eggie (2026-02-07 18:23:47+00:00): Dag Victor,

Is de naam van de speeltuin werkelijk Acasiastraat. Zoniet .. naam beter verwijderen.

MVG
eggie
NeisBot (2026-02-08 09:24:07+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 10 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/25877238 v16 | 5 crossings
https://osm.org/way/25877236 v17 | 4 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178238230
limes11 (2026-02-07 21:14:49+00:00): gleiches hier: Kein bicycle=no verwenden, wenn kein Verbot vorliegt
limes11 (2026-02-07 21:14:16+00:00): Hallo, 

bicycle=no ist eine rechtliche Aussage. 

Wenn sich der Weg nicht für Fahrräder oder MTBs eignet, dann bitte smoothness, surface, mtb:scale oder ähnliches verwenden.

Viele Grüße
apusapus (2026-02-08 15:08:55+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. Habe es über die MTB-Scale 5 versucht einzuordnen.
eggie (2026-02-07 18:27:42+00:00): Dag Victor.. Er is al een adresnode.

MVG
eggie
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-10 09:55:24+00:00): it still has cycleway:surface and bicycle=no

is it making sense?
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-10 09:55:38+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/262562106
RandomMapGuy (2026-02-10 10:07:02+00:00): The paths are corrected as they are at that spot. Where the path "Lönsweg" collides with the sidewalk #1475078601, pedestrians have to continue on the sidewalk #262562106, while the road at that point is dedicated to cyclists and they have to switch from driving on the side walk to the street. The street is a bicycle street after that point.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-10 11:27:02+00:00): then cycleway:surface seems to make no sense on sidewalk, south from Lönsweg
RunTrails (2026-02-11 20:45:54+00:00): Why are you removing service roads I added from the parking areas?
Reverend Michael Ross (2026-02-07 18:16:56+00:00): Cannot split 292nd Ave. Please help. Should be Elevator Rd. North of Filmore
f_gonella (2026-02-09 09:17:19+00:00): Ciao Hecktor, da prassi di OSM le rotatorie dovrebbero avere il livello della strada di più alto livello che afferisce, ad eccezione di motorway e trunk. Per questa ragione la rotatoria dovrebbe essere primary.
hecktor (2026-02-09 17:45:54+00:00): Hi f_gonella,
I changed to secondary because JOSM shows me an error before and says I should change to secondary. I don't know what is correct now, but it looks for me that somewhere is an error ?!
I can change back, but what is correct?
regards hecktor
Glassman (2026-02-08 02:35:25+00:00): It was my understanding that access to the much of the dike is restricted. I know there are paths that do allow access, but most seems to be closed. I believe there was a sign near the Anytime Fitness in Mount Vernon saying something that it was private property keep out. 

Can you verify that these are open to the public?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178239584
Andy__L (2026-02-09 16:40:31+00:00): I biked these dike roads last week (between Lafayette Rd in Burlington and Division St in Mt Vernon along the N/W side of the river), the signs I saw on gates were all "No motor vehicles" and the areas were regularly used by pedestrians and bicyclists (can also be seen on Strava heatmap). Maybe bicycle/foot=permissive instead of yes would be appropriate? Some of the side access roads were indeed private and I did not update those. I understand that the various dike districts have different restrictions, so if you know more please feel free to edit.
Glassman (2026-02-12 00:55:06+00:00): From all of the gates and barriers, and from talking to a former skagit county manager I don't think so, but I've email the only employee with the county to hopefully get a definative answer.
NorthCrab_upload (2026-02-08 06:16:13+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13532594887
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1417404670

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Bienson (2026-02-08 01:54:27+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178250379 - alle Gebäude kein building=house
Money Moustache (2026-03-05 09:19:25+00:00): Hoi Volgerr! Het lijkt erop dat deze changeset een van de mozaïeken van “Zilveren Manen” (normaal gesproken ingebed in de straat rond het Waterlandplein) naar een nabijgelegen bouwplaats heeft verplaatst. Ik neem aan dat dit een vergissing is - maar ik kan de bouwplaats niet betreden om dit te controleren :) Als dat zo is, kan ik het terugzetten.

Met vriendelijke groet, MM
volgerr (2026-03-06 11:36:57+00:00): Graag terugzetten
chris66 (2026-02-07 21:16:35+00:00): Sperrung beginnt glaube ich weiter rechts.
ChrisFromRV (2026-02-07 21:25:17+00:00): Hab den Abstand auch nur anhand des Fotos geschätzt.
gscholz (2026-03-02 07:23:38+00:00): Hi Wess-bzr,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding a non valid pedestrian area relation:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=1.34924&lat=47.25010&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Obviously you have assigned the wrong roles to the inner and outer items.

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Znaika (2026-02-10 16:24:25+00:00): Hi, das andere https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8728739315 war vor 4 Jahren wahrscheinlich an die falsche Position gesetzt. Oder? Zu der Zeiten war es AOK Gebäude und kein Autohändler hier.
rempshaener (2026-02-10 16:36:21+00:00): Hi,
ja, vermutlich. Ich habe gerade mal bei Mapillary geguckt, das scheint mir nicht für ein Autohaus geeignet zu sein.
Nimm es ruhig raus.
Viele Grüße
Znaika (2026-02-10 16:40:02+00:00): erl. VG
Kees 59 (2026-05-11 07:44:26+00:00): Ref: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13532635931, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13532635932, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9865307901 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13532635934.

The value 'single' is not compatible with the key cycle_barrier:installation. If 'single' is the intended value, then the key should most probably be https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycle_barrier
tenzul (2026-05-12 05:07:07+00:00): Thanks for the hint. You are right, I meant cycle_barrier=single. I will fix it.
NxPFoto (2026-02-07 19:13:47+00:00): falsche Quelle, es ist
Baden-Württemberg DOP20
DaveF (2026-02-08 20:53:44+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19877920

Removed duplicating tags that are already on the railway=station node.
eggie (2026-02-07 20:29:05+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback ....Je info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
YellowSoul (2026-02-11 23:09:17+00:00): Hallo, auch wenn die Straße eine Kraftfahrstraße ist, ist dennoch highway=trunk falsch, da es sich nicht um eine kreuzungsfreie Straße handelt. Siehe auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dtrunk
Vinzenz Mai (2026-02-16 15:03:45+00:00): Ich habe es inzwischen erneut revertiert, nachdem ich dies beim ersten Mappen als trunk von Hand gemacht hatte (und entsprechend kommentiert.)