piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2025-10-31 13:39:21+00:00): Merhaba. Lütfen değişiklik açıklamalarınıza kısaca yaptıklarıızı yazar mısınız? Bkz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Bu sokağın adının Hayrettin Paşa Sokağı olduğuna emin misiniz? TKGM Parsel Sorgu uygulamasının Adres bölümünde bu sokağın adı Eren Sokak diye geçiyor. Başka bir sokağın adını eklemek isterken yanlışlıkla bu sokağa ad eklemiş olabilir misiniz?
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2025-10-31 14:20:49+00:00): Tapınak değil de bir cami mi eklemek istemiştiniz? Cami eklemek istediyseniz lütfen bkz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dplace_of_worship
aTarom (2025-10-31 06:27:07+00:00): Hello, is 
civil=yes
a duplicate of
usage=public
?
Jens Korth at airport-information dot com (2025-12-12 11:56:30+00:00): Not sure...
In any case, there should be only ONE airport node, even if it is a joint use civil/military
NeisBot (2025-10-31 01:27:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description
NeisBot (2025-10-31 01:27:42+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "San Blas Islands Panama tourist services"
NeisBot (2025-10-31 01:27:45+00:00): Por ejemplo, una versión más neutral y objetiva de tu descripción podría ser: "Servicios turísticos de las islas San Blas Panamá"
---
(Auto-translation)
NeisReview (2025-11-01 19:04:47+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/174001046
Frans S (2025-11-08 11:26:59+00:00): Hello. Please tag each highway you map. 
You regulary forgot that.
You can add a plugin  called  FastDraw
Check this website.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/FastDraw

Best regards
Frans S (2025-11-08 11:34:12+00:00): Hi 
Another issue.
Where a road/path crosses a hedge. There must be a gap visible in the hedge.
Please make a gap in the  hedge line (just stop and continue after that path.)
Best regards
Frans S (2025-11-08 11:38:05+00:00): Please use the Bing imagery. See the instructions.
Ruthless78 (2026-05-19 14:41:40+00:00): Hey Steven - is this path open? Also, how is it intended to connect at Isabel for routing purposes?
sjdunbar (2026-05-20 19:07:31+00:00): Hi Ruthless,
There is a new industrial development in this area that provided a paved path, and this path was briefly open, and it does have connections to the new industrial buildings for employees.

However, the city has decided to close it until a connection is completed. The current plan for a connection to the Iron Horse Trail is via a bridge over Isabel 84 just north of the railroad tracks.
sjdunbar (2026-05-20 19:10:20+00:00): I have now updated the path access and the industrial area boundary, and removed the construction area.
Ruthless78 (2026-05-20 19:44:00+00:00): Ok thanks for the update. You saved me a trip. Look forward to the future path being implemented. That would certainly reroute some bike/foot traffic from the Jack London intersection.
mavl (2025-10-31 05:47:55+00:00): Здравствуйте. Подскажите, пожалуйста, почему тип здания был изменён с detached на house?
DoToDo (2025-10-31 09:39:07+00:00): Здравствуйте. Это импорт из ЕГРН с помощью плагина для Josm. Думаю значение building=detached, не очень подходит, ведь там не отдельно стоящий частный дом.
mavl (2025-10-31 09:44:33+00:00): На спутником снимке Esri в этом месте отдельно стоящий дом. Вы каким источником данных пользовались?
DoToDo (2025-10-31 10:08:32+00:00): https://yapx.ru/album/cBKHN
По ссылке скрин из Josm и ЕГРН
Спутник Esri
mavl (2025-10-31 10:52:05+00:00): building=house - это жилое здание, которое граничит с другими жилыми зданиями. То есть ряд домов, расположенных впритык. Здесь явно не тот случай. Здесь отдельно стоящий жилой дом (building=detached). Вокруг него есть хозяйственные постройки, но это ничего не меняет.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building  
  
На этой вики-странице на изображении для building=detached показан дом, впритык к которому прилегает гараж. При этом дом всё равно считается отдельно стоящим.  
   
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Residential_House_USA.JPG
DoToDo (2025-10-31 16:58:06+00:00): Вот на спутнике и в кадастре я вижу два смежных жилых дома, второй дом я тоже отрисовал по кадастру
Frans S (2025-11-07 10:19:32+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
When you map a hedge, please let a gap where it crosses a highway. (These are errors which need to be solved).
Hedges, as mentioned in the description, are important for navigation purposes. Please add all hedges within view of highways/paths.
Best regards and keep mapping
i2004 (2025-10-31 09:37:51+00:00): https://www.xcolectivo.com.ar/colectivo/recorridos.php?linea=179
Frans S (2025-11-10 13:51:49+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please do not add the tag area=yes to a hedge.
Best regards
aharvey (2025-11-04 10:37:01+00:00): the boundary=national_park tag is discouraged in Australia per the guidelines at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Land_and_boundaries

We generally use boundary=protected_area in combination with protection_title=National Park to indicate the designation along with the protect_class tag.
ArchangelEkim (2025-11-02 06:03:44+00:00): Hi this is unnecessary, these trees are not dense enough nor would they be considered a tree row. Each tree was identified and plotted. Using a tree row removes a significant amount of information that was collected. Ideally we want to turn tree rows into individual trees. Tree rows are only placed where there wasn't information of trees mapped before. I ask that this changeset be reverted. If ou have any questions you can post them in the oceania discord for discussion.
uftyv (2025-11-02 09:13:09+00:00): Hi there,

I have reverted this, however, I stand by my decision to make them tree rows. The trees are placed in straight lines. Individually marking each tree is an inefficient way of adding data. Furthermore, the trees didn't have any special tags attached to them (e.g. height).

Regards,
uftyv
ArchangelEkim (2025-11-02 09:39:29+00:00): Hi uftyv,

I recognise you are a relatively new user. It is known that if trees are already mapped they should remain so, this has been discussed here: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/trees-to-tree-rows/93890/2. Also if you wished to add tree rows (which i will maintain should just be a individual straight way not a polygonal way) you could still do so by just adding a way ontop to denote that fact. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dtree_row
fortera_au (2025-11-02 11:38:47+00:00): More accurate data is always better than less. Individually mapped trees (regardless of amount of tags outside natural=tree) is more data than just a tree row, so we'd want to keep that. Like ArchangelEkim said, you can still add a tree row using the nodes that exist for the trees, as long as the trees remain tagged.
aharvey (2025-11-03 00:09:57+00:00): I dispute the point that the tree nodes didn't have any other details on them, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12135349872 had leaf_cycle=deciduous which was lost in this change.

Regardless I agree with others points here that in this case the individual trees should be retained, even if they were just natural=tree.

I agree that it's useful to map tree rows as features especially the kind in the photo at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural=tree_row

I have at times combined both methods using mapping a way with natural=tree_row with the nodes along the way set at the position of each tree within the row and then applied natural=tree to those nodes. That captures both the individual trees and the "tree row". This approach is described on the wiki.

I'm not sure if these trees should be considered a tree row though.

What shouldn't be individual natural=tree nodes? a dense hedge.
yrtimiD (2025-10-31 18:06:28+00:00): Thanks for contribution! I guess these parkins are for electric scooters, right? Then next tag might fit better: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dsmall_electric_vehicle_parking
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:40:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321439 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Germany
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:44:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321630 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - United Kingdom
uknown-gryphus (2025-11-30 14:32:01+00:00): Hi, this way was already correctly tagged as a footpath. Could you elaborate on why it was re-tagged as a service road? I'm not clear what ground truth was used here, since there is no public imagery or news to the contrary
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:39:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321398 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - China
santamariense (2026-02-13 01:25:04+00:00): Hello Kaduna,

I would encourage you to keep the geometry with a note only. Since the available imagery still shows it, I think it would be prudent to do so in order to prevent any user from restoring it.

Regards,

santamariense
Kaduna (2026-02-16 06:26:18+00:00): Hi santamariense, 

I agree with your comments and I have made the corrections accordingly. The highway section is restored and tagged as disused:highway=trunk_link. Let me know if it’s a better approach.
SomeoneElse (2025-11-01 16:30:09+00:00): Hello,
Can I explain what https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1381022484 is?
Best Regards,
Andy
b-jazz (2025-10-31 06:44:50+00:00): Oops, reused wrong changeset description. This was a revert on a bad change that violated basic golf course etiquette (fairways crossing over greens)
DerKaiserschmarren (2025-11-23 13:09:25+00:00): Servus, darf man fragen, was mit diesem Changeset gewollt ist.
Campingplatz ist da sicherlich keiner - fahre regelmäßig mit der Straßenbahn danneben
DerKaiserschmarren (2025-11-23 13:09:35+00:00): Nur so als interesse ;)
Coelian (2025-11-24 08:10:56+00:00): Der Hintergrund war folgender: auf der Fläche campieren seit längerer Zeit radikalevangelikale Abtreibungsgegner. Jeder Versuch bei der Stadt Wien oder der Polizei zu erreichen, das man sie von dort entfernt (ist ja eine Grünfläche) geht ins Leere, es st ihnen einfach egal. Meine Überlegung - durchaus mit Grand - war, das sie sich vielleicht dann des Problems annehmen, wenn sich noch ein paar Leute mit Zelt dazu stellen. Ja, sorry, ich weiß, ist nicht der Sinn von Openstreetmap. Kann also gerne gelöscht werden. LG
DerKaiserschmarren (2025-11-24 09:59:09+00:00): Ich glaube das fällt unter temporäre Features. Im Normalfall mappt man nur, was auch wirklich für längere Zeit besteht oder bestehen wird. Mal ganz abgesehen davon, dass Campingplatz ziemlich sicher nicht der richtige Tag ist ;) - Wenn dann höchstens informal.

Ich tu mir da gerade selber schwer das zu bewerten, aber im Zweifelsfall bin ich eher fürs rausnehmen.
Ich trage ja auch keine Routen von Demonstrationen ein 😅
sykul (2025-10-31 09:37:45+00:00): Bonjour. Merci pour la contribution. Pour les horaires, il faut utiliser le syntaxe standard: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:opening_hours

Par example,  Mercredi : 17h - 00h, Jeudi au samedi : 19h - 2h serait écrit comme:
We 17:00-24:00; Th-Sa 19:00-02:00
Ebo Fosu (2025-10-31 07:20:55+00:00): A hitch in the new updates is not making the user experience so friendly. I was trying to upload this changeset with my comments and just upon clicking the upload icon it uploaded without a comment.
Hung Tran 9x0 (2025-11-14 06:26:39+00:00): bạn nên đặt tên đầy đủ là Đường Trương Định, thay vì Trương Định
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:36:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
Glassman (2025-11-01 01:36:43+00:00): I went ahead and deleted the SEO entire changeset because of the dragged nodes, but thanks for attempting to fix. (I have little patience for SEO crappy edits)
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:37:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:37:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
eggie (2025-10-31 08:32:31+00:00): Hi Merged your info with the present addressnode.
Greetz,
eggie
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:35:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
gscscnd (2025-11-02 12:55:15+00:00): The school is already tagged on this area:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1031575190
It shouldn’t be duplicated on the school building object, see:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
Please remove name and website from the building.

Unrelated, but consider using JOSM (a Java-based editor), while initially it may be more difficult, it won’t teach you some bad practices of iD (the web editor you made this changeset in).
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-31 08:11:17+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Podana kombinacja addr:city + addr:place jest nieprawidłowa. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, usuń addr:place i zastosuj kombinację addr:city + addr:street. Jeśli nie, pozostaw tylko addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/888379984

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:41:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321459 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Indonesia
TinPetreković (2025-10-31 08:13:04+00:00): The node that was accidentally created has been removed in changeset 174008363

The node served no real purpose.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174008363
NeisBot (2025-10-31 08:21:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description
NeisBot (2025-10-31 08:21:42+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Real estate appraisal service in Dallas Fort Worth area"
NeisReview (2025-11-01 19:03:15+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/174026995
NeisBot (2025-10-31 08:27:42+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Kitchen cabinetry company in St Petersburg"
NeisBot (2025-10-31 08:27:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-11-01 19:00:39+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/174026913
Fizzie-DWG (2025-11-19 23:49:22+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18978
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:41:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321459 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Indonesia
Kovoschiz (2025-11-01 09:41:39+00:00): Again it's not necessary to add `fee=no` to `=drinking_water` as it can be assumed. Only add `=yes` exceptions.
NeisBot (2025-10-31 09:00:46+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Tutoring institute for GED IGCSE SAT IELTS CU-TEP CU-BEST exams"
NeisBot (2025-10-31 09:00:46+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisBot (2025-10-31 09:00:52+00:00): ตัวอย่างเช่น รูปแบบที่เป็นกลางและเป็นข้อเท็จจริงมากกว่าของคำอธิบายของคุณอาจเป็น: "สถาบันสอนพิเศษสำหรับการสอบ GED IGCSE SAT IELTS CU-TEP CU-BEST"
---
(Auto-translation)
NeisReview (2025-11-01 19:00:06+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/174076496
GeorgeKaplan (2026-04-12 07:09:18+00:00): Boulangerie définitivement fermée ?
michel60 (2026-04-14 08:10:43+00:00): j'avoue, je ne sais plus ou j'avais vu ça !
GeorgeKaplan (2026-04-18 08:00:10+00:00): Vous avez ajouté opening_hours=closed , est-ce pour indiquer que cette boulangerie est définitivement fermée ?
Bienson (2025-11-01 01:23:21+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174043681

Adressenduplikat
joost schouppe (2025-11-20 14:27:33+00:00): Je hebt hier de toegang Spoed verwijderd! Ik neem aan dat je enkel de naam wou wissen? De spoedingang is unieke informatie die je enkel in OpenStreetMap kunt vinden, jammer als die zou verdwijnen!
Ook hier, niet nodig om de naam nog eens te herhalen op het gebouw. Adres is hier wel nuttig, omdat op de site meerdere adressen zijn.
ArneC (2025-11-20 18:36:23+00:00): Er is sinds de fusie geen spoed meer op deze site, het lijkt me dus belangrijk dit ook goed te vermelden.
joost schouppe (2025-11-21 08:56:29+00:00): Oh! Dat had ik gemist, excuses. Ik pas het aan.
joost schouppe (2025-11-20 14:22:20+00:00): Hier heb ik alle details van het gebouw verwijderd. We mappen zo weinig mogelijk dubbele info; hier is de naam en het adres al van toepassing op de outline van de site
bxl-forever (2025-10-31 15:29:49+00:00): Can you please check those 2 tags?

name=Petit Bateau
surveillance:zone=public_transport_platform

A camera does not have a name on its own.

→ operator=Petit Bateau and surveillance:zone=shop, probably?

Just reply to this comment and I’ll fix it.
Sim100v (2025-10-31 15:34:05+00:00): Oh yeah could you fix it I'm sooo sorry
eggie (2025-10-31 10:10:58+00:00): Dag OSPRvB

.. emergency =yes zal evt andere belemmeringen overrulen. Er wordt door niemand iets verwerkt in OSM.
Al je aanpassingen staan direct in de data van OSM.

MVG
eggie
OSPRvB (2025-10-31 10:21:56+00:00): hoi eggie. Wederom bedankt voor de snelle reactie. Mag ik om advies vragen? Ik had namelijk afgelopen week al mutaties gemaakt in Baarle, emergency Yes. Maar nog steeds stuurt ons navigatiesysteem de brandweer via de buitenring van het dorp. Blijkbaar zit er nog iets wat het blokkeert?
eggie (2025-10-31 10:36:02+00:00): Dag OSPRvB,

Zijn de updates al doorgevoerd in LiveNav?
Wanneer alle beperkingen overruled zijn door mergency=yes (Dit nog goed checken)
zou het best zo kunnen zijn dat LiveNav 'strafpunten' geeft aan de maxspeed 30.
Je zou bij LiveNav kunnen navragen of dat het geval is.
Ook een hogere wegklasse van de buitenweg zou een oorzaak kunnen zijn. 
Wij hebben als OSM community geen contact met LiveOp. Dus het is glazen bol kijken. 
Je zou ook even de vraag neerkunnen leggen op het forum van OSM.
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/nl/43
Groet,
eggie
OSPRvB (2025-10-31 12:56:12+00:00): Hoi. Ik ga even checken bij livenav. bedankt in ieder geval.
TinPetreković (2025-10-31 09:19:50+00:00): The node that was accidentally created has been removed in changeset 174010934

The node served no real purpose.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174010934
user_5359 (2025-11-01 13:36:19+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/relation/19230962. What is the mean of the tag note:pe = skip? (pleaase note pe isn't mentioned in ISO-639)
Peter Elderson (2025-11-02 21:41:38+00:00): Thanks for bringing this to my attention. I made a mistake, the tag was not meant to be uploaded. Today, I have removed all occurrences of this tag.
VictorIE (2025-10-31 14:25:50+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19766324

Thank you.
Tobias Conradi (2025-11-01 04:30:40+00:00): Danke!
Ruslan Fatih (2025-11-01 14:02:06+00:00): Привет! 👋
Обратил внимание, что вы убираете слово «улица» из названий

В OpenStreetMap это считается ошибкой: в теге name=* должно быть указано полное официальное название, как оно написано на табличках и в официальных документах.
Правило описано здесь:
📘 osm.wiki/RU:Good_practice#Название_улиц
«Не сокращайте названия. Тег name должен содержать полное официальное название объекта, включая слова „улица“, „проспект“ и т. п.»
Предлагаю вернуть полные формы, например:

name=проспект Абая
Спасибо за вашу работу над картой!
Sylvain M (2025-11-05 07:49:11+00:00): Salut @Mikeecho747
Pour les poteaux électriques [1], je les aurais mis en "power=pole" plutôt qu'en "power=tower", non ?
(ce sont des "poteaux" plutôt que des "pylônes", il me semble ?)

[1] exemple : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13265177685
Thibault Rommel (2025-10-31 18:21:36+00:00): Waarvoor dank ;)
Andrea Musuruane (2025-11-11 15:11:57+00:00): Ciao. Vedo che hai spostato questo POI qui: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7410612516#map=19/45.499067/7.851985&layers=N E' corretto? Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174012697
cartomatto (2025-11-13 19:32:37+00:00): Grazie Andrea per aver rilevato il problema. Ovviamente era un errore di cui non mi ero accorto. Bar rimesso al suo posto.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-31 15:33:00+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8338229670
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8338229768
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/451549772
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/471518689

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-31 22:52:13+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8338229670
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8338229768
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/451549772
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/471518689

Pozdrawiam! 🦀