piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Mammi71 (2023-08-07 20:36:34+00:00): Hallo gimin24,
warum bist Du der Meinung, dass die Abbiegerspuren primary_link sein müssen? Das sind nur Abbiegerspuren, keine Auffahrtrampen. Gemessen am Prinzip der Verkehrsbedeutung sollten diese m.M.n. nur secondary_link sein.
gimin24 (2023-08-07 22:07:13+00:00): Ich hatte irgendwo gelesen dass in der Regel die höhere Stufe genommen wird. Aber mit Deiner Argumentation ergibt  `secondary_link` hier tatsächlich mehr Sinn. Werde es gleich ändern.
Mammi71 (2023-08-08 15:28:49+00:00): Du hast bestimmt mal die Tabelle im Wiki-Artikel zu den _link gelesen. Die war umstritten und wurde inzwischen wieder entfernt.
Mammi71 (2023-08-08 15:54:56+00:00): PS: hier der Link zur Liste.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Link_roads_between_different_highways_types

rechte Seite: die ursprüngliche umstrittene Variante, linke Seite die neuere Erweiterung mit der gebräuchlicheren Variante. Die Liste ist absichtlich seit 1-2 Jahren nicht mehr direkt von der highway_link Seite aufrufbar.
gimin24 (2023-08-10 16:04:07+00:00): Ok, danke für den Hinweis!
gscholz (2023-05-06 07:19:27+00:00): Hi elC0mrade,
your recent activities have left behind several errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-39.42224&lat=-8.57041&zoom=10&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges

As you may know, this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps.

Can you please fix this?

If you look closely to the data of this changeset, you can see you have ignored a warning about crossing ways your editor ID has shown you. Please take this kind of warnings seriously.

Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2023-05-08 06:44:47+00:00): Hi elC0mrade, 
these errors still exist, can I get your feedback here?
Guido
elC0mrade (2023-05-08 14:53:53+00:00): Sorry, I hadn't seen these errors.

I made some changes, with that the errors were fixed?
mapper65363 (2023-05-07 10:31:59+00:00): Hallo Oliver,
schön, dass du die Position der Haltestelle überprüft hast. Allerdings hast du mit diesem Änderungssatz Fehler in das Kartenmaterial eingebaut. Der Punkt auf der Straße wird mit public_transport=stop_positon eingezeichnet (siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:%C3%96ffentlicher_Verkehr#Busse). Zudem hast du die Halteposition aus den Relationen für die Buslinie 11 entfernt. Beides bitte korrigieren. Dies ist nicht das erste Mal, dass ich dich auf das korrekte einzeichnen von Haltestellen hinweisen muss. Bitte die Hinweise anderer Nutzer beachten und auch darauf antworten, da dies für ein Gemeinschaftsprojekt essentiell ist.
user_5359 (2023-05-04 14:01:05+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1168147139 (one of fifty-nine objects). What is the mean of the tag Diana = LIDAR:ÚGKK SR DMR5.0, survey ? Did you mean the key source?
Scout Jens (2023-05-03 11:10:02+00:00): Damit hast Du vollkommen Recht! Danke für die Ergänzung.
adrianojbr (2023-05-03 19:06:01+00:00): Olá, DP1992!

A única observação é quanto ao formato do site, que deve conter a url completa (com https, dois pontos e barras) e removi também alguns nomes alternativos que eram do antigo estabelecimento.

Abraço!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135635542
literan (2023-05-03 18:43:21+00:00): привет.
нет такого тега maxspeed=zone:30

правильно:
maxspeed:type=RU:zone30
maxspeed=30

поправлю
MxxCon (2023-05-03 02:46:50+00:00): Hello.
Please note that this restaurant is already mapped in https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10724806705
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135635699
ovruni (2023-05-03 00:09:26+00:00): Hola, he notado que en varios de sus conjuntos de cambios se han agregado edificios grandes sobre áreas que contienen varios edificios, algunos otros con edificios sobre areas donde no hay edificios y otros incluso con varios angulos agudos, por lo que he revertido varios de sus conjuntos de cambios. Para cualquier consulta sobre el mapeo de OSM en Perú, puedes realizar consultas por el canal de telegram de la comunidad peruana https://t.me/osmpe
Saludos
adrianojbr (2023-05-04 11:29:30+00:00): Olá, DP1992!

O Pavilhão Clóvis Gaertner fica dentro (pertende) ao Centro Educacional Prefeito Luiz Adellar Soldatelli?

E a via de acesso (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/954233517) que foi removida não existe mesmo?

Abraço!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135635893
adrianojbr (2023-05-04 11:36:09+00:00): Olá, DP1992?

Se uma via não tem nome, name não deve ser preenchido. Rua Particular (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/312759938) é uma descrição de acesso da via, o que deve ser representado pela etiqueta já presente access=private.

As vias de acesso (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/414458222) e corredor de estacionamento (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/954607664) não existem mais?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135636308
DP1992 (2023-05-04 15:28:43+00:00): Corrigido
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135636308
SomeoneElse (2023-05-03 00:18:06+00:00): Hello,
What does "#deu" mean here?
Best Regards,
Andy
Seandebasti (2023-05-10 07:45:48+00:00): Hello, 
#=marker for hashtags
deu=germany ISO 3166-1 alpha 3 according to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_3166-1_alpha-3
adrianojbr (2023-05-04 11:37:52+00:00): A princípio, nada a corrigir!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135636855
adrianojbr (2023-05-04 11:40:42+00:00): Essa área verde é um espaço aberto usado para lazer, conforme documentação de leisure=park (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Tag:leisure%3Dpark)?

Além disso, não sede colocar descrições do local em name. Se um local não tem nome, name não deve ser preenchido.

Abraço!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135636940
habi (2024-08-05 15:29:13+00:00): Ciao tcarlisle
You're mentioning 'campsite correction' here, and changed all `tourism=camp_pitch`es on the campsite to `tourism=caravan_site`.
In my opinion (and according to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism=caravan%20site?uselang=en-GB) this should *not* be applied to single sites on a campground/RV park.
I've changed that back in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154856695, and just wanted to let you know about it.
Have a great day,
habi
WC392309 (2023-05-06 00:33:39+00:00): It should be just downgraded to trunk. It is a road with highway-style entrances.
Joseph R P (2023-05-06 04:06:26+00:00): Expressway=yes tags are added to this segment to imply it is an expressway, it should be reverted back to primary. Non-motorway highways need to be classified based on their status as a route rather than their physical construction, and there is an ongoing project to eliminate roads classified solely on this basis throughout the US.

I should also note that there are many other instances of primary roads in the area with freeway-like interchanges, such as along Franconia-Springfield Parkway, Franconia Road, Duke Street, Leesburg Pike, as well as some in DC and MD along Military Road, Suitland Parkway, and the three Capitol Streets.
MapPiper (2023-05-03 16:40:48+00:00): Correction: Source used was Esri World Imagery
Emilius123 (2023-05-03 10:25:19+00:00): Ist es gewollt, dass der Link, denn du als Quelle angegeben hast nicht funktioniert?
wambacher (2023-05-03 10:43:50+00:00): Nö, der ist wirklich falsch, hab ich nur nicht bemerkt.
Da fehlt am Ende noch das ".html"

Werde mal sehen, ob ich meinem Webserver das beibringen kann, da ja jetzt dutzende von CS eine fehlerhafte Source haben.
wambacher (2023-05-03 11:43:27+00:00): Hab es mit einem Redirect hinbekommen, dass das auch ohne .html funktioniert
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-06-11 10:59:37+00:00): Hi, are you sure this amentity is not vandalism? I mean usually it's discouraged to map private toilets and this is the only building with Tiilahkmõ talu name here. Maybe someone just didn't like them.

Yep, it's the same guy who renamed many names starting with Siidri to Piidri and added toilets at cider making places. 

I think there is way to create a note in StreetComplete instead of answering questions.

I'll remove the toilet from this building
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-06-11 11:10:51+00:00): Nevermind, your account is registered right after block and follows the same change pattern. Get well soon.
adrianojbr (2023-05-04 11:41:56+00:00): A princípio, nada a corrigir!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135637783
adrianojbr (2023-05-04 11:46:44+00:00): O edifício e estacionamento que eram do Supermercado Hermann não existem mais?

Caso o edifício ainda existe, somente deveriam ter sido removidas as etiquetas referentes ao uso do mercado. As do edifício e endereço deveriam permanecer. O estacionamento se está desativado, a etiqueta amenity=parking poderia ser alterada para disused:amenity=parking. 

Alternativamente se o edifício foi demolido, poderia ser removida a etiqueta building=* e incluída a landuse=brownfield, mas mesmo assim o endereço deve ser aproveitado.

Abraço!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135637955
JenTreg (2023-05-04 00:14:00+00:00): Hi, thanks for joining OSM and starting to do some edits. Rather than deleting this road, the best thing to do would be to change it to 'Driveway', which marks it as being private automatically. Thanks :)
adrianojbr (2023-05-04 11:47:16+00:00): A princípio, nada a corrigir!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135638343
SomeoneElse (2023-05-05 12:04:03+00:00): Hello Taksine,
Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9913697018/history really a hot spring?  It seems unlikely, it's under a motorway bridge and was added by someone who is using hot springs as MAPS.ME markers.
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2023-05-05 12:04:21+00:00): 你好，
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9913697018/history 真的是温泉吗？ 似乎不太可能，它在高速公路桥下，是由使用温泉作为 MAPS.ME 标记的人添加的。
此致，
安迪
SomeoneElse (2023-05-05 12:06:00+00:00): Also, all of your changeset comments are just "added".  Please do use comments that explain to other mappers what you are adding.  See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hans:Good_changeset_comments 
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2023-05-05 12:06:13+00:00): 此外，您所有的变更集评论都只是“添加”的。 请务必使用注释向其他映射器解释您要添加的内容。 请参阅 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hans:Good_changeset_comments
此致，
安迪
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 01:33:03+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153352601
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 01:46:17+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153352767
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 01:16:23+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153352372
csomerville (2023-05-03 03:44:32+00:00): Hi there. It appears you accidentally recreated the road (aka way) overtop of itself a few times instead of modifying the existing ways. Do you need help fixing this? Be sure to check out the editor tutorial if you haven't already. Wiki is also great source of information as is I'm sure local OSM community chat group or channel. Cheers!
Ezequiel Santiago (2023-05-03 04:19:58+00:00): Thank, is 2 wrong thing in this modification 

Ways: 
1168169945
1168169946

Need to be removed I added twice
MxxCon (2023-05-05 01:38:41+00:00): Hello.
"Category" is an invalid tag in OSM.
If you want to tag this business as a jewelry store, it MUST be shop=jewelry.
As such this edit will be reverted in full.
Please familiarize yourself with how to map on OSM by taking a look at https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/
If you'll continue to intentionally make incorrect edits your account will be referred to Data Working Group, which can result in a block or ban for vandalism.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135639870
BCNorwich (2023-05-03 07:41:12+00:00): Hi, Welcome toOpenStreetMap.

Sorry to say your changes resulted in major roads being dragged out of alignment. I could not see that you introduced any new data so I've reverted both changesets.

All is back as it was, if you need help mapping please just ask.

Regards Bernard.
Glassman (2023-05-04 23:12:14+00:00): #TIP: instead of removing and re-adding features, just merge/and or update the existing tags. That save the history of the object.

Also - square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135640405
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 01:33:04+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153352601
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 01:20:01+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153352415
Leonar25 (2023-05-03 05:17:21+00:00): Se agregaron aceras, cruces peatonales, áreas verdes, semáforos y paradas de autobús.
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 01:24:53+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153352468
bxl-forever (2023-05-03 08:07:44+00:00): Bonjour,

Attention : ne pas remplir le champ "Unit" dans l'éditeur iD ("addr:unit").
C'est réservé à la boîte postale, c'est très rare d'utiliser ceci.

Le tag correct pour dire qu'il y a 7 apartments est "building:flats".

Nous avons corrigé, mais je sentais utile de vous informer pour ne plus refaire l'erreur dans le futur.
IIVQ (2023-05-03 14:04:14+00:00): Beetje voorbarig, het fietspad gaat pas 5 mei open ;-)
dvdhoven (2023-05-03 14:55:12+00:00): Met deze changesets https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135631028 waren de knooppuntroutes vernield.
Ik heb alleen een piepklein stukje fietspad ingetekend omdat er een klein gat zat. Bij de FB, waar ze deze situatie in de gaten houden, was er ook een verbinding.
Dus ik denk dat je niet bij mij moet zijn, ik heb alleen maar reparaties uitgevoerd
IIVQ (2023-05-03 15:51:10+00:00): Sorry, verkeerde beschuldigd. Ik vind het prima zo, de fietser die er nu langskomt moet maar een heel klein stukje omrijden. Wel klopt service highway naast nr 22 niet, die overlapt nu met het fietspad.

Ik ben trouwens benieuwd of de fietsoversteek over de N522 blijft, of dat die afgesloten wordt en hoe het zit met voetgangers voor de bushalte.
user_5359 (2023-05-03 09:22:27+00:00): Hello! Please have look on http://www.osm.org/node/10864126736 (one of over 18,000 nodes). What is the mean of the foreign tags
confidence = 0.873203277587891
dimension = 62.0
full_id = n-101930
id = 618419154
link = http://grab.openstreetcam.org/details/1627867/35/detections
osm_id = -101930
osm_type = node

Don't add any private working keys to OSM!
mueschel (2023-05-06 11:01:53+00:00): I reverted this changeset and all its uploaded nodes that should never have appeared in OSM. Grab needs to improve their QA routines, including misspellings of common tags!
lelliuj (2023-05-03 16:02:46+00:00): В правках пропали линии
Линия 345345130 в роли outer
Линия 345345129 в роли outer
Теперь этот relation - не multipolygon
aixbrick (2023-05-03 08:47:12+00:00): Hello,
in future please adjust the outline instead of deleting and recreating it for keeping the history.
Regards
KarinaLis (2023-05-15 15:24:10+00:00): Thanks for the comment, we'll keep it in mind
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135643032
Dimitar155 (2023-05-03 14:28:42+00:00): Привет,

Десния завой от Шипченски проход към Асен Йорданов е забранен, ако си подминал пешеходния остров. Поради тази причина е сложена тази релация.

Поздрави,
Митко
d_berger (2023-05-03 23:19:14+00:00): Now I'm really getting aggravated. Seven years ago I started an intense on-the-ground(sic!) spree, that took me 18 months, just to prove Osmose wrong with it's idiotic "99,9% of navigation data implies, that...". No it doesn't! There's signage. Yes, only the 6 tenants of the building with their motorcar elevator will benefit. Still, it's indended signage, so stop "implying" things that don't exist OTG. There's signage – don't invent it.

And stop mapping for *idiotic routing engines*. Force their developers to implement barriers like a bollard properly.

I will not accept such junk data implementations, just because some devs (or their userbase) are idiots.

Thank you.
ambuehll (2023-05-04 05:53:15+00:00): OK. Got it. no need for the rant.
KarinaLis (2023-05-16 06:03:39+00:00): According to the customer feedback the road name was added #mapbox_contribute
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135643789
Mannivu (2023-05-03 10:06:17+00:00): Grazie per le tue modifiche, ma nel commento alle modifiche sarebbe meglio essere il più specifici possibile e, ancora meglio, spezzare i changeset quando fai molte modifiche in modo che se ci sono modifiche errate è più facile correggerle.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135643904
user_5359 (2023-05-04 08:58:27+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1168189511. What is the mean of the tag 26/8 = будівля?
Rom1 (2023-05-04 06:49:44+00:00): Salut Denis, juste un détail, le CD 54 s'écrit en toutes lettres "Conseil Départemental de Meurthe-et-Moselle" sans "la" voir https://meurthe-et-moselle.fr/ Merci !
Denis_Helfer (2023-05-04 16:01:26+00:00): Salut Romain,
Tu fais bien de me prévenir. J'en ai déjà modifié un bon millier. Je vais aller faire un tour du côté de chez OverpassAPI.
Mon ambition est de rentrer l'opérateur pour tout la voie classée sur Grand Est. Améliorer les tracés au passage (par endroits, c'est pas du luxe). Bref du jardinage.
Rom1 (2023-05-07 11:51:26+00:00): Salut Denis, beau challenge ! Merci.
bielebog (2023-05-27 16:54:08+00:00): Hi,
nur zu Info: Habe die Abbiegerelation eben nun wieder repariert, mit dem im Changesetkommentar zu https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129896789 angemerkten except=bus, denn das Zeichen "Linienverkehr frei" ist ja nun angebracht.
adiatmad (2023-05-03 07:15:57+00:00): Hi, good work on your edits! However, it would be preferable to avoid adding a generic name, such as name=house or name=building (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1168193450). You might want to take a look at this page (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions). 
If you're keen to know more about mapping, check out the following free resources:
∙ Beginner's Mapping guide - https://osm.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide
∙ Intermediate/Advanced self-paced learning modules - https://learnosm.org
Happy mapping!
Patr1k_P (2023-05-11 12:55:28+00:00): no spravili ste z toho celkom nezmysel, takto sa budovy nekreslia, navyse v prostriedku je cesta
ChehrehBargi (2023-06-11 19:13:59+00:00): سلام، ضمن سپاس از زحمات شما
استفاده برچسب alt_name برای وقتی هست که نام در هیچ دسته‌بندی نمی‌گنجد. در حالی که می‌دانیم نام قدیمی کوچه را در برچسب old_name می‌توان ثبت کرد. برچسب name هم که مربوط به نام رسمی روی تابلو هست.
ثبت‌هایی که در زیتون انجام داده‌اید تغییرات کوچکی داده شد و تکمیل‌تر گردید.
موفق باشید
Noktoborus (2023-05-03 10:02:33+00:00): Здравствуйте, Павел Переверзев.

Название у Вашей пирамиды единственное, но оно может быть переведено на другие языки, как русский (name:ru), украинский (name:uk), татарский (name:tt), итальянский (name:it) и другие. Потому дополнительные теги имени удалять не следует.

К тому же, данный объект не является местом разведения рыб, мальков или других видов морских организмов (подробности: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:landuse=aquaculture?uselang=ru). К Вашему объекту подходят теги "tourism=attraction" и, с оговорками, "natural=reef". Если Вы не против, то в ближайшее время верну локализацию name:uk и установлю корректные теги.
Kyl'sha (2023-05-03 14:23:43+00:00): Дело ваше, но перевод на украинский язык объектов в Крыму и Севастополе сегодня носит провокационный характер, это стоит учесть. Можете также увидеть, какие комментарии оставляли до меня. 
Насчет разведения рыб - согласен, это не сходится с целью возведения пирамиды, однако они и многие другие гидробионты обитают в самой пирамиде, лично наблюдал это. Возможно, уместнее всего было бы этот объект представить просто как достопримечательность.
Noktoborus (2023-05-03 14:39:24+00:00): К сожалению, мне известны про агрессивные "переводы" маппера avinet_ua и реакцию на его действия.

Изменил теги, добавил описание и перевод en, восстановил перевод на uk.

Надеюсь, когда-нибудь получится посетить этот интересный туристический объект.
Kyl'sha (2023-05-06 16:17:42+00:00): Благодарю за понимание!
gendy54 (2024-12-11 23:09:14+00:00): Salut,
Tu me confirmes que la gendarmerie d'Orchamps est fermée? Elle apparaît toujours dans les fichiers à jour de ce mois-ci. Et que tu as déplacé tous les tags sauf le plus important du bâtiment au landuse. Du coup, je ne comprends pas ce que tu as voulu faire.
gpserror (2023-05-05 17:46:03+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3674874

While it is true there are dedicated turn lanes I don't think they should be explicitly drawn like they here because there are no physical blockages between the lanes (a solid line doesn't count).  This is because of the additional artificial "intersections" especially that left turn lane adding unnecessary complexity.
nagdange (2023-05-09 09:47:21+00:00): Hello gpserror,

Thank you for reviewing our changeset and apologize for any inconvenience caused by the incorrect addition of the link road. We have made the necessary adjustments in the changeset (135886923) according to your recommendations. Moving forward, we will take extra care to avoid making similar mistakes in the future. Thank you once again for your valuable feedback, and we look forward to learning more from you.

Regards,
nagdange
Irfan_Muriy (2023-05-03 11:14:17+00:00): terima kasih
f_husni (2023-05-03 11:46:12+00:00): baik, sama-sama
LockOnGuy (2023-05-03 17:19:57+00:00): Hello mahmoud_eltorky, I saw you added layer=1 to footbridges in this changeset, the ones south of Zawra Park just above Yafa Street. Just wanted to let you know that these bridges are actually on ground level not above the ground and the road under them are not on normal surface level.      
Just wanted to share this info as my local knowledge of the area and I'm not sure if layer=1 is ok when the object on ground level. 
Please let me know what do you think about this.        
Thank you and regards.
mahmoud_eltorky (2023-05-07 06:33:16+00:00): Hello LockOnGuy;
Thank you for the information you mentioned, but "Yafa Street" already has "cutting=yes" and according to the description in the wiki OSM for this tag "An excavated section where the highway or railway is significantly lower than ground level".
and for streets, I have added "layer=1" because it appears in JOSM in the validation section "crossing Highways" and needs to be added "layer=1" That's the reason I added these tags
Regards
mahmoud_eltorky
Dimitar155 (2023-05-03 14:33:49+00:00): Здравей,

Това което искаш да направиш се прави с един building полигон, като отделните части се маркират с building:part вместо building. На "частите" се слагат данните за височината, етажи, покрив и т.н.

Поздрави,
Митко
foreigner037 (2023-05-03 14:49:55+00:00): Привет,

знаеш че се занимавам с пътища основно. Сградите са ми почти непознати и не знам много много как се борави с тях. Исках единствено да пробвам, защото попаднах на много готин проект, който визуализира данните в OSM в 3D, но за да излизат сградите правилно му трябват данни за височината.
https://streets.gl/#42.42740,25.63107,9.50,286.50,947.35
Dimitar155 (2023-05-03 15:30:03+00:00): Ако имаш някакви въпроси може да ме питаш. Може да разгледаш и https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_3D_Buildings за повече информация за 3D сградите.

За първи път го виждам този визуализатор. Доста буквално приема терена, предвид наполовина заровените едноетажни сгради :)
literan (2023-05-03 18:36:49+00:00): так ничего и не поняли?
soundchaser (2023-05-04 19:16:40+00:00): Прошу прощения, только сейчас пришло уведомление по моим правкам. Больше ничего подобного вносить не буду.