piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Protoxenus (2026-04-05 07:40:18+00:00): Du hast ja Recht. Aber wenn man aus versehen zu früh auf den "send"-Button drückt, kann man das leider nicht mehr rückgängig machen.
Man kann aber ohne Probleme durch einen Vergleich der vorherigen Werte mit den aktuellen Werten feststellen, was geändert wurde.
Gruß Protoxenus
Taya_S (2026-04-04 10:11:46+00:00): This edit has been reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180845824
woodpeck_repair (2026-04-13 23:31:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 181298385 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20132
NeisBot (2026-04-03 20:10:09+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 29 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/137470883 v9 | 6 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/1507832877 v3
https://osm.org/node/1507832853 v3
https://osm.org/node/1507832718 v3

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180829301
NeisBot (2026-04-03 20:13:01+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 13 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1291943053 v4 | 13 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180829438
NeisReview (2026-04-11 22:33:14+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/180838805
NeisBot (2026-04-03 20:15:59+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 13 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1495928030 v1 | 11 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180829494
iandees (2026-04-03 20:28:13+00:00): Hello! I noticed that nodes https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8952102069, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9332831061 were moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180830006, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
MassCartog (2026-04-04 02:32:54+00:00): Hello, again, not trying to hound you but also wanted to let you know features like this should not be deleted either. If the feature exists its valid and can be mapped even if its "little stuff".
NeisBot (2026-04-03 20:34:23+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 22 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1363799786 v1 | 16 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/12628031835 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180830090
iandees (2026-04-03 20:56:40+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12628031835 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180830770, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
iandees (2026-04-03 20:56:46+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11997165093 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180830774, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
MassCartog (2026-04-04 02:30:28+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM. Features you removed in this changeset are valid. Please don’t remove valid OSM data.

You have a new account and might not be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground. "Cleaning up runnable roads for wandrer" is an invalid reason to remove OSM data. Removing features that exist or modifying data incorrectly for a game or app can actually be considered vandalism.

I've restored some of the features, just wanted to let you know going forwards, thanks!
Piagno (2026-04-04 10:49:50+00:00): danke vielmals ;)
NeisBot (2026-04-03 21:21:49+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 34 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/33028893 v14 | 18 crossings
https://osm.org/way/165472534 v2 | 15 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/1770099028 v3

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180831282
iandees (2026-04-03 21:37:17+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1770099028 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180831732, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
Taya_S (2026-04-29 07:21:35+00:00): Reverted fictional edit

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181973614
ceirios (2026-04-03 21:58:33+00:00): Hi there,

Please could you ensure to press Q when adding these buildings to ensure they are square

Diolch
Ceirios
Clorinda (2026-04-20 16:50:08+00:00): Hello, in this changeset you fixed the overlapping way, thank you. Since I am still relatively new with OSM, can you please tell me how can see overlapping ways? When I changed it there was no such clue.
Thank you
joost schouppe (2026-04-30 09:07:06+00:00): So it is closed? Then the healthcare tag should be removed too, I assume? And the name moved to old_name. Often useful to keep a was:amenity=hospital too
Creador (2026-04-30 22:00:10+00:00): Yes, the hospital has been closed. There is now only outpatient care available. The site has become a health campus. I've updated the tags as you suggested. Thank you very much.
joost schouppe (2026-05-01 09:56:17+00:00): Cool, thanks for the follow-up!
oruk09 (2026-04-08 16:30:18+00:00): GS25 동탄신안점을 잘못편집해 아파트 단지 전체를 건물로 바꾸셨습니다
StC (2026-04-05 08:43:11+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre qui passe par là. Je m'occupe de la réparation.
GiovanniPen (2026-04-04 09:21:33+00:00): ciao, lo stallo per bici in piazza santa maria di gesù (10064961989) è ancora presente in realtà. non so se è fuori dal servizio di sharing ma in caso si segna come disattivato quello specificando what's on the ground
Unknown Registered User (2026-04-09 17:01:44+00:00): of course the same applies to this one
GiovanniPen (2026-04-21 12:28:50+00:00): still waiting for the revert
GiovanniPen (2026-05-02 07:40:54+00:00): hello?
JJIglesias (2026-04-04 00:04:40+00:00): Por favor recordar Escuadrar las edificaciones apretando la letra Q o en el Mouse click derecho.

Las imágenes pueden distorsionar las edificaciones pero el 99% de ellas tienen ángulos a 90 grados y son simétricas y ortogonales. Las imágenes satélites son angulares NO verticales
NeisBot (2026-04-03 22:45:49+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 9 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1433624004 v1 | 5 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1433624005 v1 | 4 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/13175821009 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180833099
NeisReview (2026-04-12 04:33:05+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/181044713
iandees (2026-04-03 23:40:24+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13272567860 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180834126, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
eggie (2026-04-04 09:03:23+00:00): Hi iggzorn.. Is this really an apartment for tourists named Joost? 
Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2026-04-05 19:06:17+00:00): Voorlopig verwijderd met changeset 180912265
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-04 07:24:37+00:00): Hi sidesalsa, welcome to OSM.

Could you please share the source of your recent mapping activities? I am not a local mapper, but I have not been able to find any information confirming the names you added for the landuse=residential areas.

Thanks in advance.
JJIglesias (2026-04-04 00:04:57+00:00): Por favor recordar Escuadrar las edificaciones apretando la letra Q o en el Mouse click derecho.

Las imágenes pueden distorsionar las edificaciones pero el 99% de ellas tienen ángulos a 90 grados y son simétricas y ortogonales. Las imágenes satélites son angulares NO verticales
NeisBot (2026-04-03 22:58:12+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 7 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/14098892 v4 | 4 crossings
https://osm.org/way/858223218 v2 | 3 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180833359
iandees (2026-04-03 23:40:28+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8000676471 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180834130, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-04 07:24:24+00:00): Hi sidesalsa, welcome to OSM.

Could you please share the source of your recent mapping activities? I am not a local mapper, but I have not been able to find any information confirming the names you added for the landuse=residential areas.

Thanks in advance.
savsk (2026-04-09 18:51:47+00:00): Czy taka "excellent" ta smoothness to bym dyskutował. Droga nie jest już pierwszej świeżości.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:smoothness
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-04 07:24:14+00:00): Hi sidesalsa, welcome to OSM.

Could you please share the source of your recent mapping activities? I am not a local mapper, but I have not been able to find any information confirming the names you added for the landuse=residential areas.

Thanks in advance.
eerib (2026-04-09 16:09:22+00:00): There should be a trail here but it may require some searching at the trail intersection as users may have obscured the entrance. I can see recent  user data in the past month for this trail in the Strava dataset, which suggests it's still seeing use.

If you're in the area again, please double check as it's unlikely that the trail no longer exists.
PatGT (2026-04-10 00:01:18+00:00): I looked around for quite awhile. It was quite frustrating. I was hoping the trails on Open Steet Map would be more reliable. 

It would have been nice to check out the creek.
NeisBot (2026-04-04 00:43:17+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/1495965787 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Corporate Park building"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-12 04:33:04+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181213982
(Delete spam tags. First version)
DressyPear4 (2026-04-04 18:29:16+00:00): Olá, informações pessoais não devem ser adicionadas ao mapa
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180834820
iandees (2026-04-04 00:56:10+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3269001134 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180835007, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
bonitense (2026-04-06 19:55:40+00:00): Candeias
Warin61 (2026-04-05 01:06:06+00:00): Hi
Welcome to OSM!
Some hints? 
The relation 20407838 - parking was not 'closed' not forming an area but a simple line. I have combined the two ways that were in the relation into one way and closed it I have then placed the parking tags on that single way and deleted the relation. 
I have reduced the parking area so as not to conflict with the pedestrian way. 

The tag 'construction' on the parking area  ... I don't see that in the imagery. So I have left that off ... Was that an error or is something happening there??? 

Keep mapping.
smithandjosh (2026-04-05 10:46:54+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for that, I had seen that error and wasn’t sure where it was. Thank you very much for fixing it.

Thanks, I missed that, looks like it would have been there from a previous editor that made changes for the T block construction.
NeisBot (2026-04-04 01:16:01+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 12 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/534669908 v3 | 8 crossings
https://osm.org/way/534669910 v1 | 4 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/5184802172 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180835154
iandees (2026-04-04 01:32:37+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5184802172 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180835326, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
felipeeugenio (2026-04-04 15:21:58+00:00): Hola.
No son bosques esos. Y en caso de ser basurales, no son permanentes. No dibujamos situaciones circunstanciales.
saludos
joshnolan (2026-04-11 11:53:52+00:00): שלום ירח אפל, תודה רבה על כל הקווים שהוספת לצפון! איזה כיף לראות את מפת התחב"צ מתפתחת.
אפשר לשאול איך אתה מוסיף כל כך הרבה קווים (ביחד עם ה-ways) בכזאת קלות? יש ב-JOSM איזה plugin שמאפשר את המיפוי באופן שהוא לא לסמן ידנית כל קטע דרך בקו האוטובוס?
ירח אפל (2026-04-11 13:23:26+00:00): זה לא תוסף, זה מובנה ב־JOSM
בעבודה עם יחסים, ניתן להעביר קטעים שלמים בין יחס קיים ליחס חדש, 
ולכן ברגע שיש קטע ארוך שמורכב מהרבה מקטעים, ניתן להעביר אותו בשלמותו, וגם להעביר קטעים מכמה קווי אוטובוס ולחבר בינהם.
ואחרי זה פשוט לתקן את החלקים ששונים בינהם.
joshnolan (2026-04-11 16:54:46+00:00): מגניב!
felipeeugenio (2026-04-04 14:55:03+00:00): Ojo acá. Te fuiste en paralelo con un área residencial. Además había varios elementos más. Ya los acoplé. Saludos
eggie (2026-04-04 06:37:23+00:00): amenity=drinking_water ontbreekt.
eggie (2026-04-04 06:37:01+00:00): Tip.. amenity=drinking_water ontbreekt.
aceman444 (2026-05-11 18:35:06+00:00): Zdravim, ta Vycvikova skola stale existuje a je funckna. Tak neviem preco ste to zrusili.
eggie (2026-04-04 06:34:46+00:00): Dag Xylene,
De hoofdtag 'moet' zijn amenity=drinking_water.
Dan zie je een symbool.

Mvg,
eggie
syncronic (2026-04-04 08:47:42+00:00): das trailblazed gehört laut wiki nicht auf die Routenrelation, es ist ausdrücklich für ways gemacht
WBSKI (2026-04-04 12:39:01+00:00): updated it here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180851680
aharvey (2026-04-14 23:07:25+00:00): Thanks for cleaning these up!

I've also set healthcare:for=children;parents which I think is probably correct.
Supaplex030 (2026-04-04 11:27:51+00:00): Hallo kjon,
parking=half_on_kerb ist hier in der Heynstraße korrekt, da Gehwegparken (halb auf dem Gehweg) angeordnet ist. "street_side" wäre es nur bei baulich angelegten Parkbuchten.

Eine andere Frage ist, ob die separaten Flächen hier eine elegante Idee sind. Da hier nichts markiert oder baulich angelegt ist o.ä. habe ich den Parkraum zu centerline-Tags umgewandelt und die "Hindernisse" wie Bäume, Straßenlaternen (vgl. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:obstacle:parking) und Einfahrten ergänzt.

lg, Alex

P.S. vielleicht haben dich die dominanten P-Symbole auf der OSM-Carto-Standardkarte gestört? Bisher unterstützen die Carto-Maintainer leider noch nicht alle street-parking-Tags (vgl. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Parken_im_Stra%C3%9Fenraum) im Rendering, aber das sollte für uns als Mapper nicht ausschlaggebend sein, "falsche" Tags für den Renderer zu setzen.
NeisBot (2026-04-04 06:48:55+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13703853002 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Pharmacy store"
---
예를 들어, 당신의 텍스트에 더 중립적이고 사실적인 버전은 "약국"일 수 있다
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-12 10:33:04+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181223010
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
NeisBot (2026-04-04 07:18:52+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13704921683 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Technological services office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-12 10:33:07+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181223011
(Delete spam tags. First version)
scarapella (2026-04-05 19:05:11+00:00): Hello,

Thank you for your contributions to openstreetmap.  Did you intentionally change canoe=yes to caone=yes on the way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/22720130  or was it just a mistake?

Vielen Dank für Ihre Beiträge zu openstreetmap.  Haben Sie absichtlich canoe=yes to caone=yes auf dem Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/22720130 geändert oder war es nur ein Fehler?

Thanks,
scarapella
eggie (2026-04-04 08:35:50+00:00): Welkom bij OSM.
Bedankt voor uw bijdrage. De format phone heb ik aangepast naar +31..
MVG
eggie
hatul (2026-04-04 19:55:49+00:00): שלום amirs,
תודה על העריכות אבל שים לב ליחסים כשאתה עורך. שברת את שביל ישראל ואת שביל הים.
amirs (2026-04-04 21:20:01+00:00): שלום hatul,
מצטער, לא יקרה שוב, תודה על התיקון
eggie (2026-04-04 08:39:37+00:00): Dag Marc,

De nieuwe verbindingen lopen deels door het water. Wat is daar?  Een dam met duiker of bruggen?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-04-04 08:59:40+00:00): Water aangepast
eggie (2026-04-04 08:40:49+00:00): Dag Marc...   Een bruggetjes? Een dam?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-04-04 08:48:21+00:00): Ik heb het water aangepast.
eggie (2026-04-04 08:49:23+00:00): Mag regulier verkeer nog wel over die busbaan?
Marc Samsom (2026-04-04 12:01:48+00:00): Het water is daar ter plekke anders aangelegd. Dit is overigens geen busbaan, maar een normale weg met een voetpad ernaast.
eggie (2026-04-04 12:07:42+00:00): Oke.. Ik heb het water aangepast conform de laatste sat foto van vorige maand.
Dat klopt nu.
Alle wegen op het terrein zijn als service getagd.. dus daarom consistent gemaakt.
Bedankt voor je reactie