piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
trigpoint (2025-11-22 20:05:41+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/175003574
marczoutendijk_repair (2025-08-12 13:49:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 170343370 where the changeset comment is: ¨DWG
fortera_au (2025-06-23 22:43:35+00:00): Hi there, the whole area (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/498407441) is already marked as amenity=fuel, adding it to the shop way is just duplicating information.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167980403
user_5359 (2025-06-24 15:50:41+00:00): Hello! Please use british english for the keys!
phoenixsaigon1698 (2025-06-25 02:41:42+00:00): Này mới cắm biển báo mới nhỉ?
tuan_gsm (2025-06-26 03:20:41+00:00): Cấm cũng cả tháng rồi
SomeoneElse (2025-06-29 13:17:04+00:00): Hello tomyak,
Please do use more descriptive changeset comments than just "updated" - it really will help other mappers to help you!
Best Regards,
Andy
phoenixsaigon1698 (2025-07-02 09:54:15+00:00): changset 167206978 của tôi là Đê Trần Khát Chân cấm chiều  ô tô từ Nguyễn Khoái đi Đường Trần Khát Chân. Bạn vui lòng bật Mapillary lên để biết chiều di chuyển của xe. Từ Hướng Trần Khát Chân -> Nguyễn Khoái oto đi vẫn được.
HantDX (2025-06-23 08:38:23+00:00): Так уже ж есть урочище Лявонаўка по соседству, зачем ещё одно создавать?
Антон-1983 (2025-08-18 11:00:31+00:00): Ок. Удалил дубликат. Оставил правильное место
Timmy_Tesseract (2025-08-13 04:16:50+00:00): Good day Anye. Welcome to OSM and thank you for your edits.

What exactly is Balay Amakan? There's probably an object category that would fit better than historic castle.

Best regards, Timmy
literan (2025-06-23 19:00:19+00:00): точно, асфальт в подземном переходе?
SafwatHalaby (2025-10-18 11:34:23+00:00): שיניתי את השם ל-loc_name. דיון והסבר כאן: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167051134
AntBurnett (2025-07-14 07:48:01+00:00): Hi Andrew, what is the reasoning behind topologically joining the culvert to the Hume Freeway near Greta Road?
Andrew Hughes (2025-07-15 10:04:08+00:00): Hi AntBurnett,

The topology join is just that.... we want the culvert to have a durable realtionship with the road way(s).

There are a number of reasons for this... OSM considers the culvert to be part of a waterway, yet in every occasion I am aware of a culvert is an asset that (like bridges) are belonging to Transport Departments (such as DIT, DTP, TMR, Main Roads,  City Services, State Growth as well as LGA's).

Given that culverts are largely considered to be transport infrastructure outside OSM, this topology should ensure that relationships can not only be established but also monitored and called out in particular when using the ID Editor. It should be far more stable than relying on geometry intersection alone.

I hope that carries enough reasoning to stand up :)

Cheers AH
AntBurnett (2025-07-15 10:09:32+00:00): Thanks Andrew for the reply. I haven’t seen many culverts with topology to roads but I see your reasoning. It’s a mountain of potential changes. I’ll keep an eye on other culverts in my work.
AntBurnett (2025-07-16 02:56:38+00:00): I've had discussions with colleagues about adding topology for culverts.

The consensus here is that adding topology for culverts is a bad idea and brings no benefit to the road network. In fact it hinders editing of the road above the culvert.

Culverts should be treated as tunnels (the tag is tunnel=culvert after all) and the two ways should cross each other without connecting at the intersection point. Other assets like power and telecommunications conduits under the roadway do not have topological links to the surface either.

There are 4 culverts in all of Victoria that have topology with the trunk/motorway roads above it.
eggie (2025-06-23 08:46:02+00:00): Je vraagt feedback
Dit is oke....
Gr eggie
Cdrik_69 (2025-06-23 07:25:36+00:00): merci de l'ajout de l'arbre remarquable.

Il me semble que les URL des photos prises par StreetComplete disparaissent au bout de quelques jours quand la note est fermée. À vérifier.
SpinOff (2025-09-23 21:08:21+00:00): maxspeed has been set to 30, but source:maxspeed is still set to PL:urban.

See: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/185810501

Here is the description of this tag. Fix it please: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source:maxspeed
mk2k22 (2025-08-05 13:46:49+00:00): Hi, how come you removed the osmc symbol from Via Alpina Red route?
GBAB (2025-08-05 19:12:43+00:00): Hi, I just tried to follow the guidelines of the wiki (i.e..the lowest level route segments do not bear any OSMC symbol);
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ViaAlpina
StC (2025-06-27 14:50:35+00:00): Bonjour,

il me semble que c'est ce changeset qui a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre qui passe par là. Mais c'est difficile à affirmer en l'absence de commentaires et sans enquête plus approfondie.

Je tente la réparation.
eggie (2025-06-23 08:57:44+00:00): Dag Frank... Zo'n beetje alle accesstags ontbraken hier. Ik heb het uitgebreid vaan C1
Het routeerde hier gewoon voor motorvoertuigen. Dat zal niet de bedoeling zijn met een C1 bord.
Op het wegelement ook emergency=yes toegevoegd.
MVG
eggie
nevw (2025-06-23 08:35:35+00:00): You have misplaced this closer to Adams St than Powers St.
It would be better to add the details to the building instead of a fence next to a footway
nevw (2025-06-24 05:36:06+00:00): I have reverted this misplaced address
Pmz (2025-07-28 06:43:27+00:00): Bonjour, il ne s'agit pas de liaison sud-est, mais de liaison sud ouest. Si la liaison routière à 2*2 voies semble enterrée pour l'instant, il y a d'autres projets sur cet espace, et la métropole continue de préempter des terrains sur cette bande "dans le cadre de l'emplacement réservé LUSO" (cf délibération DEL20250627_084 du 27 juin 2025).
Pouvez-vous donc rétablir ce polygone, s'il vous plaît ?
Axel Flordal (2025-06-23 09:12:25+00:00): Om jag har förstått det rätt så ska den vara en dublett enligt wikin. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=swimming%20area?uselang=en, "A swimming area should never be mapped on it's own. It should always be "part of"/"belong to" (though this does not imply that their elements have to intersect or for there to be a relation between them)". Den ena är inhängnade badområdet och den andra är en markör för platsen.
archie (2025-06-23 09:24:21+00:00): dublerade namn och taggar
Axel Flordal (2025-06-23 09:31:16+00:00): Var det bara namnet som skulle bort? För det var olika taggar på dem.
archie (2025-06-23 09:37:22+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
Axel Flordal (2025-06-23 09:46:15+00:00): Som jag förstår det så är det ju två olika saker som existerar. Ett innhägnat badområde och en badplats. Därav "A swimming area should never be mapped on it's own", jag är rätt ny till detta så det är därför jag undrar hur det ska vara. Jag tycker att sidan för swimming_area är väldigt tydlig med att det ska finnas båda.
yrtimiD (2025-06-23 23:01:01+00:00): Hi, please be sure that addr:street is absolutely equal to the name of the street. If street name is incorrect - it can be fixed as well
OmerMadlan (2025-06-25 07:14:58+00:00): תודה על ההערה. שם הרחוב נכון והנקודה תוקנה.
Frans S (2025-06-24 10:06:07+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please do not map rectangular buildings as a round building.
See the general comments to recognize which objects no buildings
Best regards
eggie (2025-09-24 08:36:55+00:00): Hi Adrie.. Please comment your edits in English or German.
Greetz,
eggie
Frans S (2025-06-24 10:24:24+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this task
Please check this clip how to map a round building.

https://learnosm.org/en/hot-tips/tracing-round-buildings/
Best regards
mat (2025-06-24 06:37:04+00:00): Can you expand a bit on the "no access" ? Is there some roadworks going on ? Is the road temporary closed ? Is it permanent ?
osm_2023 (2025-06-24 08:41:51+00:00): Hi,
a few days ago I wanted to pass the way with my bike and there is a barriere over the whole width. I passed this barriere an after a few hundred meters at uphill the way is broken away. If I could, i would send you a photo. It is possible to pass by bike at a rest of the street of ca. a half a meter, but it is officially not allowed.
No matter how long it takes to repair the damage.
tantanWS (2025-06-23 12:25:05+00:00): thank you for adding to OSM. please make sure that buildings are square or represent the actual outline of the building.
please add the addres as part of the building polygon of a node on the outline in the entrance.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167989829
OmerMadlan (2025-06-23 14:24:59+00:00): תודה על ההערה.
נקפיד על כך להבא.
yrtimiD (2025-06-23 22:52:50+00:00): Hi, could you, please, double-check this address. There is no street with this name around.
(and also house number 2 you added recently)
OmerMadlan (2025-06-25 07:11:54+00:00): היי,
העדכון נכון.
שם הרחוב הוא "הנחל", והמשך הרחוב הוא "השח"ל".
yrtimiD (2025-07-19 21:21:21+00:00): תודה, נכון, הכול בסדר!
OSM_RogerWilco (2025-06-23 22:16:20+00:00): Sei bitte etwas achtsamer bei Deinen Änderungen. Hier habe ich nach vor Ort Besuch den Radweg über die tatsächliche Wegführung mit abgesenkten Bordstein gelegt. Du hast die Radroute einfach über einen erhöhten Bordstein gelegt. Warum? Wollen wir uns das vor Ort gemeinsam ansehen?
geozeisig (2025-06-24 05:22:18+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. Vielleicht kannst du die entsprechende Stelle nachbessern.
Frans S (2025-06-24 10:34:30+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping. 
Please check the comments how to identify round buildings
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1E9lhIbxBtzYxibS9vY0p2F9XvlWgdCUs/view?usp=sharing

Best regards
Frans S (2025-06-25 15:16:06+00:00): Hello . 
Thanks for mapping.
Please check this image how to map round buildings
"https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/images/8/80/Round-blds-id.gif
Best regards
Frans S (2025-06-25 15:25:04+00:00): Hello.
Please map the buildings individually, round buildings as a round building. Do not cluster buildings and square, rectangular buildings.
Bestr regards
trigpoint (2025-06-23 10:38:35+00:00): Reverted by DWG
Udarian (2025-06-23 19:02:39+00:00): what was the source for the road names.
aseigo (2025-06-23 19:24:52+00:00): The addresses on the houses, which I then re-confirmed with some online searches for those same addresses.
aseigo (2025-06-23 19:25:47+00:00): Oh, and I double checked against Miami-Dade's open map data as well.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-06-23 08:40:56+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/463570674

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
user_5359 (2025-06-24 14:21:43+00:00): Hello! I change your aaaaa to fixme (see https://www.osm.org/node/12946128088)
multimob (2025-06-25 06:36:40+00:00): Thanks, we can remove this tag entirely; I run a home-made script to push new stops into JOSM before uploading and use this "aaaaa" key to easily review them before uploading. On this changeset I forgot to remove it before uploading. Thanks for the help.
kitsee (2025-06-23 16:16:25+00:00): Hi Richard, just in response to your note, this is common for NCN routes. My local route 46 also has few missing chunks. The routes are usually built in small chunks that get connected up over time.
kitsee (2025-06-23 16:18:21+00:00): Ignore my previous comment. for some reason I thought you added the tag not removed. :/
Richard (2025-06-23 16:55:11+00:00): Indeed - "my" route (NCN 442, which I designed and largely implemented) has two missing sections which will be fixed one day...

NCN 43 is intended to go via roughly Tirabad and Trecastle to join the two sections, I think. But I'd be pleasantly surprised if that happens any time in the next 10 years!
Supaplex (2025-06-23 14:49:25+00:00): 好像要把wall拿掉，至少海上部分不會有牆
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167990878
trigpoint (2025-06-23 10:38:44+00:00): Reverted by DWG
Brad Davidson (2025-06-23 08:55:45+00:00): Road has been open since May 21 2025 as per https://www.wilsonvilleoregon.gov/engineering/page/boeckman-road-corridor-improvements
eggie (2025-06-23 10:17:35+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
notmyproblem1 (2025-06-25 09:52:07+00:00): Thanks, it's an automated edit? Cuz you created the footway when there's also the footway, I will cut n delete thanks
Map47 (2025-06-25 13:06:29+00:00): Ciao notmyproblem1,
Il multipoligono https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19276216
è stato da te inserito in un modo, non corretto, che ha generato una segnalazione in, OSMI aree, precisando che il ruolo dei membri dovrebbe essere "outer"
Io ho modificato la relazione per eliminare la segnalazione in OSMI, ed ho aggiunto le footway per collegare le scalinate e gli ingressi per non avere segnalazioni in OSMI routing.
Dai un'occhiata a questa pagina per le segnalzioni relative al routing https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/hdyc-osmi-issues?uid=22242779
Buon mapping
MihaelIvanjek (2025-06-23 09:16:36+00:00): Reverting because of an accidental change #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167992705
DwarfNebula_ (2025-06-23 15:33:57+00:00): Hi Jakecopp,

Why did you remove way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/33391953 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/225182673? Both of them will be available again after the roadwork will be complete in a few weeks. https://www.utrecht.nl/fileadmin/uploads/documenten/wonen-en-leven/verkeer/verkeersprojecten/socrateslaan/2022-11-socrateslaan-definitief-ontwerp-nieuwe-inrichting.pdf

It's not very helpful to remove items from the map if it's under construction. Could you please revert the changes of removing those?
jakecopp (2025-06-23 22:19:46+00:00): Hi, thanks for that additional context - I will add these back. My mistake.
Thanks.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-06-23 09:10:52+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/463570674

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eggie (2025-06-23 10:21:55+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  Ik zie dat hier wandelrtoutes lopen. Eigenlijk kun je die niet bewerken met editor iD. De routerelaties gaan dan stuk.
Ik kijk even of het simpel is op te lossen.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-06-23 10:27:34+00:00): hersteld...  en pad losgemaakt van landuse grass
ivanbranco (2025-07-25 10:09:23+00:00): Ciao Texxxxx,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1221176881

qua hai segnato che non c'è il marciapiede. Ma da Bing Streetside si vede ancora (almeno da un lato della strada). Esiste ancora o è stato rimosso?
Texxxxx (2025-07-28 09:22:37+00:00): Buongiorno,

ho indicato solo il senso unico del tratto della via, non mi pare di aver modificato le info sul marciapiede. Confermo comunque che il marciapiede esiste.
Grazie

Saluti

Matteo
eggie (2025-06-23 11:53:59+00:00): Beste .. Ik zie hier geen enorm zwembad

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-06-23 12:00:26+00:00): Aangepast naar gras en klein zwembadje,
bartgron (2025-06-24 20:52:08+00:00): I changed and now it's ok
eggie (2025-06-23 11:51:55+00:00): Hier heb ik de wirwar weer uit de knoop gehaald. Tip Geen paden aan de landuse plakken, want bij verschuiven komt alles mee. Check ook wat je hebt gedaan.
Hier je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=167992816

MVG
eggie
Frans S (2025-06-24 14:51:56+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping. 
A remark, You tend to oversize the buildings you map. Stay within the rooflines. These huts have an overhang.
Best regards
Frans S (2025-06-25 13:00:17+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
A remark, You tend to oversize the buildings you map. Stay within the rooflines. These huts have an overhang.
Best regards
Map_HeRo (2025-06-25 18:45:44+00:00): Hi kru220,

you have added several nodes in this area and tagged them with name=hostel or name=camp for refugees from ukraine and not only from ukraine. Again you added 5 notes saying that these are tourist hostel with internet access.

Please refrain from doing so. If you want to add refugee accomodation and you are not sure how to do that, place 1 (!) note in the area and express what you want, preferably in german language (or english).

Just to confirm: You want to express that the small buildings set up in this area are accommodation for refugees and equipped with internet access, correct? How many altogether?Any other details?

Cheers Mikke
eggie (2025-06-23 10:46:50+00:00): .. en hier routeert niets meer.. Ook zijn de routerelaties allemaal stuk.
eggie (2025-06-23 10:48:55+00:00): Zou je svp willen stoppen met het bewerken van wegen waar routerelaties overheen lopen. Het is door jouw tempo nauwelijks te herstellen.
Wellicht heb je niet door welke schade je aanricht?
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-06-23 12:50:13+00:00): Inmiddels zijn alle routerelaties weer hersteld. Er wordt je overigens niets kwalijk genomen. Je bedoeling was uiteraard goed.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-06-23 10:38:39+00:00): Dag Staphorster.. Svp geen name='voetpad achter verhoging langs' gebruiken als naam op de kaart.
Het is niet de uitgegeven straatnaam.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-06-23 10:42:35+00:00): Ahh.. je hebt de naam weer zelf verwijderd.
eggie (2025-06-23 10:44:18+00:00): Hier lijken de routerelaties onderbroken?
eggie (2025-06-23 10:45:11+00:00): Hier routeert niets meer....  Ik kijk even of het weer te herstellen is.
literan (2025-06-23 18:54:02+00:00): это не сама клиника, а ее представитель, потому теги больницы неуместны
eggie (2025-06-23 10:34:08+00:00): Dag Stahorster,
Elk begin is lastig.
Niet schuiven met de kaart in editmodus.
Daardoor heb je Lommertsteeg 8 verplaatst en vastgemaakt aan de weg.

Ik zal de node weer terugplaatsen.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-06-23 10:35:23+00:00): Ah  dat was de buurtschap.  Die zal ik losmaken van de weg
eggie (2025-06-23 10:36:35+00:00): Kan dit wellicht beter als hamlet worden getagd ipv neigbourhood
eggie (2025-06-23 10:31:39+00:00): Staphorster... Je kun het beste op de bestaande adresnode bijtaggen.

MVG
eggie
Fjavion (2025-07-17 16:14:25+00:00): Není II/643 v Štěpánovicích překlep místo II/634?
vojtechzaboril (2025-07-17 19:10:16+00:00): Ano je, má to být samozřejmě 634. Prosím o opravu. Díky
eggie (2025-06-23 10:56:17+00:00): ...en ook hier is alles stuk
eggie (2025-06-23 11:41:46+00:00): Beste.. Hier heb ik alle routerelaties hersteld en de kruising versimpeld ivm de busroutes.
Voor routerelatie bewerken is veel ervaring vereist en een andere editor.
Vraag in het vervolg hulp aan het forum of zet een opmerkin g op de kaart. Dan kan een ervaren mapper het aanpassen.

MVG
eggie
rempshaener (2025-06-23 15:48:23+00:00): Hallo,
hier wiederum: house=semi-detached ist ziemlich unüblich.
Viele Grüße
RobotFK (2025-06-23 15:52:32+00:00): Hi,
Würdest du eher building=semidetached_house
vorschlagen ?

Nach dem Bild im Hinweis ist es ja offensichtlich eine Doppelhaushälfte
rempshaener (2025-06-23 17:41:58+00:00): Hallo,
ja genau, das ist deutlich weiter verbreitet.
Viele Grüße
literan (2025-06-23 18:49:45+00:00): то тег для высоты над уровнем моря.

удалю.
TangledRockets (2025-06-27 06:22:12+00:00): Hallo Bernward,

Du hast hier die network Tag gekürzt und stattdessen ein sehr seltene Tag eingesetzt um diese Information zu behalten. Wobei network:short schon da ist, was die abgekürzte Network beschreibt.

*:short ist das anerkannte und standard Format, um die Abkürzung einer Name zu beschreiben; network:short hat zBsp 257k Anwendungen.
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/network:short

Network:long_name hat gerade 887. Network:long hat gerade 289. Die Verhältnis ist schon aussagekräftig. 

https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=network%3Al

Vor man pauschal Tags anpasst, dient es ein Blick in der wiki. Wenn das Tag nicht in Wiki steht, sollte man zweimal denken, vor er es anwendet.

Ich würde dir bitten, diese Änderungen zurückzusetzen.

Grüße
TR
bernward1 (2025-07-28 12:23:07+00:00): im VRM,  VRS, und VRR sind die Abkürzungen der gewöhnliche Gebrauch. Daher ist die Abkürzung richtig für das network Tag.

Erst seit diesem Jahr wird von manchen Mappern network in den vollen Namen geändert.

Um ihnen eine Alternative aufzuzeigen habe ich gesucht was dafür schon gebräuchlich war.
Das war network:long_name und network:long. Ich habe mich für letzteres entschieden.

Übrigens halte ich den vollen Namen für überflüssig. (Außer in Aachen und Augsburg weil dort das Kürzel identisch ist. )
BCNorwich (2025-06-23 13:17:46+00:00): Hi, I've reverted the change reinstating the original pitch and add your info to it. Thus all the features history is maintained. I removed the generic name, OSM uses formal verifiable names.

Regards Bernard.
DwarfNebula_ (2025-06-23 15:44:32+00:00): Hey, the "minibieb" will be operated by the owners of the house it's near. So, an operator is not necessary there. I have removed it.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8647424980

Thank you for the other changes!

PS. please put changeset comments in the main language of a country or English.
DwarfNebula_ (2025-06-23 15:46:23+00:00): Sorry, I mean the brand tag :)
tuan_gsm (2025-07-09 01:23:25+00:00): Đoạn Pasteur này way:1232849516 1 chiều đổi thành 2 chiều rồi hả?
phoenixsaigon1698 (2025-07-09 01:28:11+00:00): Ừa đoạn này thấy có xe quay đầu được lê Lợi -> Lê Lợi (hướng đi Nguyễn Huệ). Đồng thời không có biển cấm quay đầu
NorthCrab_upload (2025-06-23 10:31:08+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1408775413

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Harfeur (2025-06-27 08:31:01+00:00): Bonjour, le changement est correct !
Merci beaucoup !

~Harfeur
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167996060
Layft Greater (2026-05-11 14:41:18+00:00): Hello Afrandez,

What was the principle used to re-classify to suburbs or towns?

E.g. these are both admin_level=0 but different "place" levels.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7228301774/
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9247107888/

Thank you in advance.
Harfeur (2025-06-27 08:24:33+00:00): Bonjour, le changement est correct !
Merci beaucoup !

~Harfeur
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167996609
Larmax (2025-07-27 19:26:09+00:00): Hi, It should be "Uudenkyläntie" not "Nybyntie" like it is on MML Background Map which you gave as your source.
borovac (2025-07-27 20:04:46+00:00): Thanks for the correction. I checked the information, the street should be named "Uudenkyläntie" not "Nybyntie".
Thanks again.
rempshaener (2025-06-23 15:46:37+00:00): Hallo,
solche Anpassungen finde ich unglücklich; die Adresserfassung ist in mehreren Varianten anerkannt. Hier gilt: Levve un levve losse
Viele Grüße