piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
grzegorz75jan (2025-01-30 11:21:45+00:00): Zastanowił bym się dwa razy nad pojęciem moja mapa. Zmiana do wycofania.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian

https://youtu.be/xBMIoypkdI4?list=PLTgtPjgzssHzsgAqYbi2QfRoRk1S9ioX5&t=2596 > opisy


https://play.google.com/store/search?q=streetcomplete&c=apps&hl=pl

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=info.zverev.ilya.every_door&hl=pl
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161916907
grzegorz75jan (2025-01-30 11:20:14+00:00): Gratuluję. Osiedle jest dumne a zmiana do wycofania.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian

https://youtu.be/xBMIoypkdI4?list=PLTgtPjgzssHzsgAqYbi2QfRoRk1S9ioX5&t=2596 > opisy


https://play.google.com/store/search?q=streetcomplete&c=apps&hl=pl

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=info.zverev.ilya.every_door&hl=pl
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161916994
Unarmored5156 (2025-01-31 04:18:03+00:00): Partly reverting (deleting ContaineR Park addition for reasons prior stated)
Unarmored5156 (2025-01-31 07:03:23+00:00): Reverting for similar reasons as to https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161918270 (duplicated buildings and objects)
Unarmored5156 (2025-01-31 04:01:58+00:00): Fully reverting as there's no need for three ContaineR parks.
Unarmored5156 (2025-01-31 01:24:13+00:00): Hi there, I was also wondering what your data source for this data was. It seems rather unlikely that all the house owners here would allow you to measure their home and garage heights, so I'm wondering if you pulled from a copyrighted source possibly? All I'm looking for is just a link to a data source or an explanation. Thanks!
roschker (2025-02-10 18:15:54+00:00): Hi, I did not measure the houses and garages. The data is from Open Calgary (https://data.calgary.ca/Base-Maps/2D-Buildings-Map/h98y-bpv6) (not copyrighted). Cheers
Unarmored5156 (2025-02-10 19:07:39+00:00): Cool, thanks for replying :)
eggie (2025-01-30 07:49:28+00:00): Dag laurens.. Probeer svp wat netter in te tekenen.
Het gaat ook om de kwaliteit en niet alleen de kwantiteit.
warnings:crossing_ways:building-highway
  	2
Parkeerstroken zijn geen parkeerterreinen.
Voeg dan toe parking=street_side
orientation=perpendicular  (of parallel, diagonal) Dan krijg je ook niet al die grote P's in de wijk op de kaart.
MVG
eggie
nieuwlaurens (2025-01-30 12:38:42+00:00): Beste, ik snap het programma niet helemaal.. Ik heb het zo netjes mogelijk proberen te doen? Ik meld ook veel op Google Maps, Daar wordt veel van mij toegevoegd.  Dat systeem snap ik makkelijker. Dus vandaar. Ik hoop dat u dat kunt begrijpen. Fijn dat het alsnog wordt toegevoegd En u het kan nakijken. Bedankt!
eggie (2025-01-30 13:49:47+00:00): Dag nieuwlaurens . Er wordt je niets kwalijk genomen.
We proberen gewoon tips te geven aan nieuwe mappers.
Probeer eens de basishandelingen  van editor iD uit.
https://learnosm.org/nl_NL/beginner/

Daar vind je vast wel hoe je iets mooi rechthoekig kan maken en in de wiki vind je ook hoe te mappen.
Ik zal je nogmaals onze welkomstmail met handige tips en links sturen..
MVG
eggie
SekeRob repair (2025-01-30 07:53:52+00:00): Ciao,

con questo e con il precedente set di modifiche che importavano le tracce gpx, hai creato nuove vie in aggiunta a quelle esistenti. Ripristinerò queste due vie.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161901088
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161917477
Mi dispiace, ma se vuoi modificare la geometria e i tag delle caratteristiche devi farlo sulle vie esistenti. Di sicuro so per esperienza personale che i gpx generati in bicicletta non sono molto precisi, ma possono essere usati come guida per mappare nuove vie o correggerle.
SekeRob repair (2025-01-30 07:58:10+00:00): Revert https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161926417
Alessandro Paoletti (2025-01-31 15:07:00+00:00): Scusa ma sto cercando di capirci qualcosa solo da poco... come mai le tracce scompaiono e ricompaiono con diversi livelli di zoom?? Come faccio per far comparire le tracce su opencyclemap?
Unarmored5156 (2025-01-31 04:01:55+00:00): Partly reverting this one (ContaineR Park already existed, adding two new parks is redundant, as well you dragged a intersection node onto part of the "new" park outline), but the house addition seems valid and should be kept.
Unarmored5156 (2025-01-31 01:22:05+00:00): Hi there and welcome to OSM! I was poking around recent changesets in the Calgary area and came across this one that looks slightly suspicious.

Can I ask why you removed the amenity=social_facility tagging from w1350752898? Without that tagging, the subsequent social_facility=outreach tag is also useless. It seems like you didn't remove the name or phone number either, so I'm wondering if it was merely an accidental deletion?
Unarmored5156 (2025-02-03 23:39:24+00:00): No replies in 4 days, I'm going to go ahead and revert the amenity=social_facility change. If you have reason otherwise feel free to follow up here.
Unarmored5156 (2025-01-31 04:01:53+00:00): See 161918011 for an explanation on why I'm reverting this one https://osm.org/changeset/161918011 (sidewalks already existed here, edits to them were just adding redundant nodes)
Unarmored5156 (2025-01-31 05:44:55+00:00): Reverting as the new sidewalk duplicates an existing one for most of its path. It could be fixed up by splitting the way in the middle but at this point I'm kinda tired of manually doing some of these. Extend the existing sidewalk if you'd like to.
Unarmored5156 (2025-01-31 04:01:51+00:00): See 161918011 for an explanation on why I'm reverting this one https://osm.org/changeset/161918011 (sidewalks already existed here, edits to them were just adding redundant nodes)
Unarmored5156 (2025-01-31 04:01:48+00:00): See 161918011 for an explanation on why I'm reverting this one https://osm.org/changeset/161918011
Unarmored5156 (2025-01-31 04:01:44+00:00): Reverting for similar reasons to 161918045 https://osm.org/changeset/161918045, however fully reverting this one as it already had the alley here.
Unarmored5156 (2025-01-31 05:44:58+00:00): Reverting for similar reasons as to https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161918270 (the new foot path duplicates an existing highway=cycleway that permits foot traffic)
Unarmored5156 (2025-01-31 04:01:41+00:00): I'm partly reverting this changeset as the path only partly duplicates the alley added here. The path has been deleted while the alley has been kept.
Unarmored5156 (2025-01-31 03:17:06+00:00): Reverting for similar reasons to 161918151 https://osm.org/changeset/161918151
Unarmored5156 (2025-01-31 05:45:01+00:00): I remember this being under construction several years ago when I visited this area... but I'm not sure about now and given the construction area is just added with this changeset I doubt it. Requires survey to verify. Not reverting.
Unarmored5156 (2025-01-31 02:53:52+00:00): Reverting this changeset for similar reasons as to 161918246 and 161918226, but also the fact you've used highway=pedestrian here. highway=pedestrian has a very specific and limited (at least in Calgary) definition. Almost all use cases should be highway=footway (a highway=cycleway existed underneath which is also valid given it was tagged with foot=designated). You can read the info for each on the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dfootway and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dfootway
As far as I know the only actual valid use of highway=pedestrian in Calgary is on Stephen Avenue.
Unarmored5156 (2025-01-31 05:45:04+00:00): Reverting for similar reasons as to https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161918270 (highway=pedestrian is inappropriate in this context, and duplicates existing crossings)
Unarmored5156 (2025-01-31 02:53:48+00:00): Reverting this one as well. See notes on 161918211 https://osm.org/changeset/161918211 for why
Unarmored5156 (2025-01-31 05:45:06+00:00): Reverting for similar reasons as to https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161918270 (highway=pedestrian is inappropriate in this context, and duplicates existing crossings)
Unarmored5156 (2025-01-31 02:53:44+00:00): I've also reverted this changeset for similar reasons as to those in 161918246 and 161918226, but also the fact you've placed a highway=motorway here. 

A highway=motorway has a very specific, very limited definition. You can read the specific definition on the wiki page (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=motorway), however to sum it up, a highway=motorway is a protected-access high speed, non-signalized road. I've been here before and I know this section of Calgary does not meet that definition. The only roads in Calgary that do meet that definition are Deerfoot, Stoney, small parts of 16 Ave, sections of Glenmore, and Crowchild.
Unarmored5156 (2025-01-31 02:53:39+00:00): I've reverted this changeset as well. See my comments on 161918246 for a reason of why
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161918246
Unarmored5156 (2025-01-31 05:45:08+00:00): Reverting for similar reasons as to https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161918270 (highway=pedestrian is inappropriate in this context, and duplicates existing crossings)
Unarmored5156 (2025-01-31 02:09:01+00:00): It appears this changeset adds a duplicate road on top of another already existing one. This isn't something that should be done, any modifications to a road network should update existing data or add new data only if it doesn't exist. Here, you've added new data when it already exists. 
If you're curious for more information, you can check out the OSM wiki page for this general guideline at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element

I've reverted this changeset as well.
Unarmored5156 (2025-01-31 01:03:50+00:00): Hi there! I was poking through recent changesets in the Calgary area and stumbled upon this one. It seems you're new to OSM, so first off, welcome.

You've added highway=motorway objects on top of already existing highway=tertiary here. There are two major problems with this.
First, a highway=motorway has a very specific definition, and it is not met here. You can read the specific definition on the wiki page (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=motorway), however to sum it up, a highway=motorway is a protected-access high speed, non-signalized road. I've been here before and I know this section of Calgary does not meet that definition. The only roads in Calgary that do meet that definition are Deerfoot, Stoney, small parts of 16 Ave, sections of Glenmore, and Crowchild.
Second, you should follow the rule of "One feature, one OSM element": https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
> An OSM element should represent a single on-the-ground feature once and only once.
Here, you've duplicated roads with the highway=motorway and highway=pedestrian.

Speaking of the highway=pedestrian, this tagging has limited application. Almost all use cases should be highway=footway. You can, once again, read the info for each on the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dfootway and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dfootway
As far as I know the only actual use of highway=pedestrian in Calgary is on Stephen Avenue.
On top of that, as mentioned above, you've duplicated the highway=pedestrian with the highway=footway that was there before. As stated before, you shouldn't be doing that.

I currently don't have the time to revert this changeset but unless someone else gets around to it before me I'll do it at some point later.
Unarmored5156 (2025-01-31 01:34:39+00:00): Similar to the comment I just recently added on your RBC Bank change, this cafe already "exists" as n725890300 https://osm.org/node/725890300. However, this cafe closed recently - https://dailyhive.com/calgary/vendome-closing-calgary and its website states the same. As such, I've reverted this changeset as well and deleted the existing node.
Unarmored5156 (2025-01-31 05:45:11+00:00): Reverting for similar reasons as to https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161918270 (highway=motorway is invalid here)
Unarmored5156 (2025-01-31 01:31:37+00:00): Hi there and welcome to OSM :)

I noticed this changeset adds a RBC bank node. However, this specific bank branch already exists in OSM! It's n9576579212 https://osm.org/node/9576579212, thus this node is redundant and can be deleted. I've reverted this changeset for you.
silversurfer83 (2025-01-31 09:24:06+00:00): Moin

Wenn das die von dir im Forum
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/ungefahren-verlauf-von-erdkabeln-aus-anderen-karten-nach-osm-ubernehmen/125056/
Erwähnten Kabel sind, dann nimm sie bitte wieder raus, bis das mit der Quellenlage geklärt ist.

Grüße
Silversurfer83
Bobbi123 (2025-02-01 10:40:16+00:00): Schafft ihr dort erstmal wieder eine sachliche Basis zur Diskussion, ohne dass ich sofort von praktisch jedem angegangen werden. Dann können wir gerne weiter drüber reden. Aber so wie jetzt, wo ich dort von mehreren Leuten derart abfällig behandelt werden, hat es einfach keine Diskussionsbasis.
silversurfer83 (2025-02-01 11:17:58+00:00): Kannst du bitte einfach sachlich auf den Kommentar eingehen? Ich habe dich hier in keiner Weise angegangen und im Forum sind auch alle sachlich
OSM_RogerWilco (2025-02-03 13:51:29+00:00): @Bobbi123: Warum nennst Du nicht einfach die Quelle? Das ist schon sehr auffällig und lässt vermuten dass sie nicht mit OSM kompatibel ist.

Es macht eher den Eindruck, dass Du den Schaffner anschnauzt, weil er Dich beim Schwarzfahren erwischt hat. ;-)
Unarmored5156 (2025-01-31 05:45:14+00:00): Reverting for similar reasons as to https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161918270 (duplicated residential road)
Unarmored5156 (2025-01-31 05:45:16+00:00): Reverting for similar reasons as to https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161918270 (duplicated residential road)
Unarmored5156 (2025-01-31 05:45:18+00:00): Reverting for similar reasons as to https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161918270 (duplicated residential road)
Unarmored5156 (2025-01-31 05:45:21+00:00): Ladybug already exists as n9581502446. Reverting for this reason.
Unarmored5156 (2025-01-31 05:45:23+00:00): An alcohol store already exists here as w51372653. Reverting for this reason.
Unarmored5156 (2025-01-31 07:03:27+00:00): There already exists a Starbucks right next to this node, reverting for this reason
Unarmored5156 (2025-01-31 07:03:30+00:00): This RBC already exists as w222721445. Reverting.
Unarmored5156 (2025-01-31 07:03:33+00:00): This node isn't a Safeway, it's a gas station. The actual Safeway is already there, a few dozen meters south. Reverting for this reason.
felipeeugenio (2025-01-30 12:29:40+00:00): Hola Kote. Te doy la bienvenida a OSM Chile.
Respecto de tu edición tengo algunos comentarios:
1) por favor no realinear los caminos. Las fotos que estás viendo (Mapbox) tienen un desplazamiento al igual que todas las otras fotos. lo mas seguros que podemos estar sobre la verdadera posición es usando las trazas strava, que son como estaba posicionado el pueblo. Acabo de corregir todo eso.
2) por otro lado, en la foto satelital se notan varios cruces que borró totalmente. Ahora los estoy reponiendo.
3) al agregar cruces nuevos por favor notar los tags que se usan.

Estos errores son normales en quienes empiezan. No hay de qué preocuparse. Puede unirse al chat de Telegram de la comunidad en el link https://t.me/OSMcl para aclarar mayores dudas. En el chat somos centenas de maperos resolviendo dudas a maperos nuevos como usted.

Saludos cordiales
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161918910
TransAct - YP (2025-01-30 00:54:54+00:00): #transact
rskedgell (2025-03-30 12:24:00+00:00): The bus lane was already mapped with the older bus:lane=left tag on Home Gardens and has now been replaced with lanes=3 + bus:lanes=1 + bus_bay=left. The mapping for the renderer has been removed.
GeorgeMann1 (2025-01-30 07:15:09+00:00): I shall enjoy slowly watching all of Ewa's houses finally get filled in
Falkons (2025-01-30 07:37:32+00:00): After finishing this area, I won't head down to Ewa Beach first but Royal Kunia first and maybe realign/redraw buildings which were not done correctly since it was earlier on when I first started editing and with worse imagery. Then I'll head south.
opendcc (2025-02-25 07:57:37+00:00): Hallo, das ist nicht als Roundabout beschildert.
wyk (2025-02-26 03:04:51+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis und die Korrektur der Straße. Bin gerade unterwegs, werde die Buslinie 167 baldmöglichst anpassen (wenn es sonst niemand tut).
Gruß Werner
GustavoE (2025-01-30 04:28:09+00:00): Favor de eliminar esa "casa" de dimensiones desproporcionadas
felipeeugenio (2025-01-30 12:09:01+00:00): Casa eliminada.
saludos
RubenKelevra (2025-09-04 17:12:58+00:00): Warum machst Du hier meine Korrektur wieder rückgängig und trägst erneut den falschen access-Tag `motor_vehicle=destination` ein?

An der Zufahrt zu Marscheid steht ein Schild für die Zufahrt zu der Straße. Dies ist auch genau so vor Deinem "Nachtrag" als `motor_vehicle:backward=destination` für Router eingetragen.

Es gibt aber keinerlei Beschilderung innerhalb vom Marscheid, die ein Tagging in beide Fahrtrichtungen erklären würden. Deshalb hab ich dieses Tagging vor 12 Monaten entfernt, da es falsch ist.

Die falschen Informationen die Du nun erneut eingetragen hast, sind schwer von Routern zu verarbeiten, da nicht klar ist ob man vom "Trotzhausen" nun über "Marscheid" fahren darf, oder über "Kleinbeck" fahren darf.

Entweder muss der Router alle Zugangsbeschränkungen ignorieren, bis der den Bereich verlassen hat, was unter Umständen nicht der Realität entspricht, weil unter Umständen vor "Kleinbeck" noch ein weiteres Schild steht, oder er versucht den kürzesten Weg zu nehmen um den Bereich zu verlassen, das zu suboptimalen Routing führt.

In jedem Fall lässt sich vor Ort in Marscheid kein Schild finden, dass die Zufahrt von Trotzhausen aus durch Marscheid nur für Anlieger erlaubt, somit entspricht Deine Änderung nicht dem Zustand vor Ort.

Daher weise ich erneut auf den Artikel im Wiki hin:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Verifiability
drolbr (2025-09-04 17:26:29+00:00): Aus dem Dreieck Trotzhaus, Marscheider Bach und Kleinbeek sind die Restriktionen sogar noch restriktiver: jegliche Motorfahrzeuge sind dort nur 21-14h zugelassen.

Daher die Korrektur.

Brauchst Du die Schilderstandorte oder findest Du die Schilder selber?
mini-me (2025-01-30 12:14:05+00:00): Здравствуйте!
Эта пристройка является частью дома 17
https://rgis.spb.ru/mapui?location=51678
литА иногда не указывают, но это один адрес
5m4u9 (2025-01-31 04:43:43+00:00): Hola, bienvenid@!

gracias por añadir las tiendas y la plaza. Corregí algunas porque no estaban categorizadas como tiendas de barrio.
gscscnd (2025-01-30 10:08:16+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
NeisBot (2025-02-08 08:06:09+00:00): Hi Salyut, thank you for your contribution to the OSM project.

Over your latest stretch of time, you've made at least 91 changesets with minimal or no meaningful comments.

To enhance collaboration, please consider using the comment field to describe your map changes. This helps others understand and follow your adjustments more easily. You can find guidance on good changeset comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 

Thanks!

I've also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
mavl (2025-05-13 15:06:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
mavl (2025-05-13 15:05:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
BCNorwich (2025-01-30 06:40:10+00:00): Duplicated building Way: Business Design Centre (1355303925) removed.
BCNorwich (2025-01-30 06:36:20+00:00): Hi, More untagged ways, can they be removed or will you rag them. If they stay they would be better if squared up.
BCNorwich (2025-02-10 07:29:24+00:00): No response so I've removed the untagged ways and nodes.
gscscnd (2025-01-30 13:26:00+00:00): Obszar natural=wood wokół pojedynczego drzewa to trochę przesada, a usunięcie węzła natural=tree i zastąpienie go takim obszarem to na pewno niedobry pomysł. Poprawisz?
grzegorz75jan (2025-01-30 14:14:00+00:00): Statystycznie to głos wołającego na pustyni. Przeważnie nie poprawiają, nie odpowiadają, ignorują a wręcz nawet nie wiedzą, że ktoś napisał. Często narobią dziadostwa i kontynuują lub za jakiś czas znikają a bajzel zostaje. 

Przeważnie widać to po nazwie konta, "opisach" zmian i samych edycjach.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian

https://youtu.be/xBMIoypkdI4?list=PLTgtPjgzssHzsgAqYbi2QfRoRk1S9ioX5&t=2596 > opisy

https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/pl/40

https://play.google.com/store/search?q=streetcomplete&c=apps&hl=pl

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=info.zverev.ilya.every_door&hl=pl
gscscnd (2025-01-30 14:26:39+00:00): Statystycznie tak, zobaczymy tym razem. Mogą nie wiedzieć jak nie czytają poczty, bo jedynie pocztą idzie powiadomienie o komentarzu.
grzegorz75jan (2025-01-30 14:43:46+00:00): Tak ale ostatnio jest plaga rożnych indywidualności. Można poczytać na Discordzie a czasem forum. 

Często pozornie nic wielkiego się nie dzieje ale przyjdzie czasem coś ruszyć i spod dywanu wychodzi coś nie do ogarnięcia i to przez lata się nawarstwia oraz dochodzą faktyczne zmiany w terenie. Najlepsi są ci od malowania landuse i upiększania mapy. Wszystko posklejane czy trzeba czy nie. Przechodzi przez budynki, narusza drogi, granice, relacje itd. Koszmar edycyjny bo zwykłe usuniecie często zabierze ze sobą wkład innych, historię obiektu.

Wysyłam linki, podpowiedzi. Dramat. Sporadycznie bywa poprawa lub znikają przynajmniej nie robiąc dalszego problemu. Zaczynam łagodnie a czasem lecę już z grubej rury.

Każdy biorący się za edycję powinien znać podstawowe prawidła. Opisy, kontakt, douczyć się. Nie mamy 48 godzin w 24 godzinach na zabawę. Sprawy osobiste też każdy ma.
grzegorz75jan (2025-01-30 21:16:04+00:00): Autor nie odpowiada na wiadomości ale ma czas na usuwanie pracy innych przy okazji robiąc błędy i tym samym dodając kolejnej pracy innym edytującym i kontynuuje błędne edycje . Opis zmian - żenada.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161955408
gscscnd (2025-01-30 22:15:11+00:00): Ten tu jest dość świeży, ale ogólnie niestety zgoda. Tyle zmarnowanego czasu.
grzegorz75jan (2025-01-30 22:28:40+00:00): Kolejna edycja przeważyła https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161945058

Staram się w miarę możliwości oszacować konto jak i edycje. Jeżeli brak kontaktu (bywa, że długo czekam) a edycje lecą dalej bez zmian na lepsze to naciskam guzik. Wtedy czasem się odzywają. Jeżeli rozmowa ma sens to zawsze można przywrócić edycje. 

Patrząc na mapę, wielu rzeczy  pozornie nie widać. Dopiero gdy otworzy się edytor a zwłaszcza JOSM to w niektórych miejscach nic tylko zaorać bo szybciej zrobić od zera. Jest więcej edycji i grubszych błędów niż normalni edytujący są w stanie choćby tylko przejrzeć pobieżnie a samemu też się lubi edytować nowe rzeczy. Są obiekty które mają ponad dziesięć lat i wymagają aktualizacji. Nie do przerobienia a malarze artyści dokładają do pieca. Swoje na liczniku masz to co mam tłumaczyć :)
grzegorz75jan (2025-02-10 22:50:26+00:00): gscond i patrz jak pacjent radośnie tworzy mało sensownie dalej. Minęło prawie dwa tygodnie. Kto to będzie sprzątał. Takich należy eliminować jak najszybciej. Zniknie mu trochę bohomazów to się ocknie.
gscscnd (2025-02-11 09:52:51+00:00): Widzę, że dostał blokadę, może się odezwie.