piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Grass-snake (2024-07-11 20:35:15+00:00): Reverted changesets:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145227890
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145227718
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145227369
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145227102
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145226583
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145226472
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145226392
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145225004
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145224892
busnotturno95 (2024-07-11 20:39:49+00:00): Separate le linee 54 e 54/ con le rispettive relazioni, per un totale di 4 relazioni. Collocazione delle relazioni nei rispettivi membri, come risultanti da rilevazione.
divaddivag (2024-07-12 08:06:54+00:00): 🥳
ZekOwney (2024-07-12 09:24:40+00:00): Ouais, JOSM, BANO, Fantoir, Pifometre... j'attaque !
CurlingMan13 (2024-07-13 08:44:30+00:00): I reviewed your chagneset as requested by you.  This changeset looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153829331
CurlingMan13 (2024-07-13 08:44:15+00:00): I reviewed your chagneset as requested by you.  This changeset looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153829376
Norbert Dichter (2024-07-12 10:30:45+00:00): Much appreciated, Gregory, is see it : 153829531

Thank you for the heads-up, 
  Nodi
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153829531
Gregory Peony (2024-11-02 16:06:42+00:00): I don't understand. Is there maybe a typo here?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153829531
gurglypipe (2024-07-12 10:22:15+00:00): Please don’t turn every meadow/wood/area into a multipolygon, it makes things a nightmare to edit in future
phodgkin (2024-07-12 17:22:07+00:00): I've generally mapped linked fields/landuse by drawing field boundaries and then collecting these into landuse using an MP. It seems inefficient and awkward to have 3 nodes per field boundary point. But I appreciate that it would be best to avoid turning woods etc. into MPs simply because they abut a field.
CurlingMan13 (2024-07-13 08:43:49+00:00): I reviewed your chagneset as requested by you.  This changeset looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153829752
CurlingMan13 (2024-07-13 08:43:34+00:00): I reviewed your chagneset as requested by you.  This changeset looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153829794
yrtimiD (2024-07-13 23:55:17+00:00): Did you really meant to convert village to cafe?! (Kafr Yasif, node 278474386)
5m4u9 (2024-07-12 07:00:53+00:00): Hola, gracias por empezar a mapear.

Hay un error en tu edición, desplazaste los edificios hacia la izquierda porque pensaste que estaban "mal". Pero en realidad la imagen satelital de fondo es la que está desplazada.

La sugerencia es siempre mover la imagen antes de empezar a editar.

De todas formas ya corregí esa edición.
felipeeugenio (2024-07-12 12:24:49+00:00): Hola.
Por favor no usar nombres descriptivos.
Por otro lado, sería muy bueno que usara, en un nodo traffic_sign=maxspeed y maxspeed=80 y ponerlo exactamente donde el cartel está ubicado.
gracias y saludos
CurlingMan13 (2024-07-13 08:42:58+00:00): I reviewed your chagneset as requested by you.  This changeset looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153830035
Pink Duck (2024-11-10 09:55:15+00:00): They must have changed the sign since. Probably a misheard road name over the phone at the sign-makers originally :)
Nathan_A_RF (2024-10-30 15:56:45+00:00): It looks like these speed limits might be in km/h. If so, did you convert them to mph, and why?
A Trainspotter from Berkshire (2024-10-30 16:30:40+00:00): I didn't convert them, the sectional appendix has displayed in mph vaule, so that is the vaule which was put in. As the trains use mph in the core, if the vaule was in kmph it would have a k after the number to indicate that's it is kmph as shown on Cambrian line, however no k means it is in mph. https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/crossrail_central_operating_sect_3
CurlingMan13 (2024-07-13 08:43:12+00:00): I reviewed your chagneset as requested by you.  This changeset looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153830131
ljc_jlyb (2024-07-25 01:48:20+00:00): Esri Clarity may be very outdated in the region, please use default esri instead
kakiremora (2024-09-05 13:51:02+00:00): Dlaczego "przywróciłeś do ruchu" Babią Wieś przy Nordic Astrum?

Pozdrawiam
kakiremora (2024-09-05 14:01:45+00:00): Widzę że to jednak poprzedni changeset/edytor "odbudował" tory, ale nadal, powinny być zmapowane inaczej niż teraz

Pozdrawiam
kubzon7 (2024-09-05 14:04:01+00:00): Dzień dobry,

Faktycznie nie zwróciłem uwagi przy dodawaniu ograniczenia prędkości że użytkownik AnnaCatarina zmienił stan na otwarty, podobny przypadek miałem na skrzyżowaniu Gdańska/Chodkiewicza gdzie narysowałem tory jako planned, ten sam użytkownik zmienił mi status na istniejący, to poprawiłem
kubzon7 (2024-09-05 16:00:22+00:00): Jeszcze raz dzięki za zauważenie, przywróciłem railway=disused sprzed mojego i poprzedniego changesetu
user_177389 (2024-07-12 06:07:51+00:00): reverted
user_177389 (2024-07-12 06:08:00+00:00): reverted
busnotturno95 (2024-07-11 21:55:22+00:00): Creata l'area cantiere per la costruzione del nuovo edificio della stazione ferroviaria di Sesto San Giovanni. Eliminazione degli elementi stradali interessati presenti nell'area del cantiere.
Separazione in due corsie del tratto finale di Via Monte Grappa, per via di uno spartitraffico.
silversurfer83 (2024-07-12 06:31:47+00:00): Moin :)

die URL musikkneipe-luisenburg.de funktioniert nicht. Bist du sicher, dass dort eine "bar" ist?

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153831209
user_177389 (2024-07-12 06:08:07+00:00): reverted
user_177389 (2024-07-12 06:08:16+00:00): reverted
mueschel (2024-07-12 08:42:47+00:00): Erinnerung:

Hallo,
bitte schaut nach den parking-Tags die hier in der Gegend hinzugefügt wurden. Viele sind "parking:side:..." - "side" darf aber nicht im Tag auftauchen und muss durch left/right/both ersetzt werden.
Nathan_A_RF (2024-07-21 10:20:32+00:00): As much as this is nice information, are you sure this can be added given it's a system that has long been removed?
SPalferro (2024-07-11 22:55:04+00:00): Este conjunto de cambios será revertido al finalizar la Fiesta del Poncho
user_177389 (2024-07-12 06:08:23+00:00): reverted
user_177389 (2024-07-12 06:08:30+00:00): reverted
Gabe DeFreitas (2025-01-21 01:21:19+00:00): Hello smlyons77. What is your source for marking South Liz Lane as Township Road 80906 and State Road Mobile Manor as Township Road 81608?
smlyons77 (2025-01-21 01:29:06+00:00): I used ODOT's County Local Roads Inventory's spreadsheet:
https://www.transportation.ohio.gov/programs/technical-services/tech-services-card-catalog/04-ri-134a
Gabe DeFreitas (2025-01-21 01:38:03+00:00): Thank you
julcnx (2024-07-15 03:07:15+00:00): Hi wwjd2022, thanks for your contributions! Are these tracktype=grade5 composed only of grass/mud  as per the wiki guidelines ? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tracktype#See_also
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153833242
wwjd2022 (2024-07-15 14:26:52+00:00): Thank you for asking and mapping in the CM area! Yes, it is mainly grade 5 from my point of view. But it may depend on the season. It has just rained when I was there and the surface was soft and of soil/sand. During dry season it may be more compact because the surface dries out. How to map this?
I downgraded one trail to grade 4 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153975225) but this trail is not smooth at all (like on the wiki-page) and very uneven with runnels. Maybe you remember the situation as you seem to have been there, too.
julcnx (2024-07-15 15:16:25+00:00): Sounds good! Check out this link for info on the smoothness attribute: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:smoothness

In Thailand, dirt roads that city cars can't handle usually start at smoothness=very_bad, meaning small ruts that a pickup truck can handle. Bigger ruts or roots needing a heavy-duty 4WD are smoothness=horrible. If the ruts are so big only off-road motorcycles can get through, that's smoothness=very_horrible.

Hope this helps, and thanks again for your awesome contributions!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153833242
wwjd2022 (2024-07-15 15:54:12+00:00): Thank you for the quick and helpful response! But I leave it to you to decide whether it is horrible or very horrible when you will possibly use the track with a motorcycle :). 
I appreciate very much your great mapping in this area of TH, hopefully you will get some support as there is a big potential.
julcnx (2024-07-16 03:47:38+00:00): OK I will :) Thank you for your nice words!

Please feel free to join the Thailand community forum if you haven’t:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/th/53

And reach out to me directly on FB if you have any questions/concerns:
https://www.facebook.com/julcnx/ 

Cheers, Julien
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153833242
wwjd2022 (2025-06-23 13:44:32+00:00): I just realised that I have not answered and this discussion could not be closed yet (if needed and possible).
Thank you for the invitations! I am not often enough in TH to join the community. 
Cheers!
Nathan_A_RF (2024-09-20 12:11:50+00:00): Are you sure https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/165220698/ has a speed limit of 39mph?
pitscheplatsch (2024-07-12 05:16:04+00:00): :D 
Namen für Kneipen gibt ... ;)

Der Eintrag dieser Bar hat bei mir eine Nachricht verursacht. Danke für diese Kartenergänzung!

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12048239424

#HappyMapping
Leo Slager (2024-07-12 21:44:46+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Fizzie-DWG (2024-07-16 02:59:12+00:00): Reverted by DWG as apparent fictitious feature

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153995223
martien-176 (2024-07-20 17:14:43+00:00): Hi,  thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. You requested a review of your mappings. 

The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Zoom in as close as possible to see the outline of the buildings, hit each corner of the building carefully. Look for shadows, open ground, changes in roof color and vegetation to differentiate buildings.Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. 

Please watch these 2 short video for more info: 
-Buildings--> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o

Thanks so much for your contribution, Martien, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153834130
Norbert Dichter (2024-07-12 12:44:36+00:00): Thank you
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153834881
Gregory Peony (2024-11-02 16:09:10+00:00): You're welcome.
nevw (2024-07-12 04:02:20+00:00): Hi Ben, you removed the place=village tag from Dookie. I assume this was not intentional and do you want me to put it back?
nevw (2024-07-12 23:43:38+00:00): I have re-added this now
Fizzie-DWG (2024-07-12 02:57:16+00:00): Hello Noah & welcome to OSM. Sorry, but I have some concerns about what you have mapped here. You've mapped "Square Island" as very small, & it isn't visible on any imagery? & while there is a sandy beach visible on imagery, it isn't anywhere near the size that you've mapped "The Beach" as? Is that also it's actual name? Could you please confirm these items are correct? Thanks
Alexis Giraud-Courtney (2024-07-12 02:58:10+00:00): More* farmland
OptikalCrow (2024-09-12 20:31:59+00:00): Why have you created  recreation grounds that are literally just the street areas? https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17827478 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1300805998

Please stop importing parcels with nonsensical tags. They are unhelpful to map and do not exist on the ground. You have been blocked multiple times for this.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-07-12 03:50:29+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3803670

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Leo Slager (2024-07-12 21:49:19+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Leo Slager (2024-07-12 21:52:09+00:00): je hebt op een aantal adres-nodes de postcode verwijderd.
Waarom ?
Ik zal deze changeset reverten en de postcodes weer terugzetten op de kaart.
Leo Slager (2024-07-12 21:54:49+00:00): Reverted with changeset 153873498
Fizzie-DWG (2024-07-12 04:29:16+00:00): Hi. Do any of these roads actually exist, or are they only planned? In some cases, you have roads apparently running through buildings, all of which are mentioned above: 96 warnings about roads crossing buildings! I also note repeated use of "Sovereign". Is that your company? In that case, please refer to both https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing & https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines. Thanks. Graeme Fitzpatrick, Moderator, OSMF Data Working Group
thangqd (2024-07-12 08:23:14+00:00): Finally, thank you for your comments, and I hope that we have more discussions when running this project
thangqd (2024-07-12 08:26:54+00:00): Dear Graeme Fitzpatrick. 
First of all, thank you for your comments.
My name is Thang Quach, GIS team lead from Sovereign Solutions, and  sovereign_khoipm is one of my team member. We are now working on a project of Updating OSM road for several States in India, including 
1. KERALA, 2. TAMIL_NADU, 3. Andhra Pradesh, 4. TELANGANA, 5. KARNATAKA, etc. 
Regarding your comments, in our updating guideline, we use official and reliable sources hosted as xyz tile services, used as a custom background when editing on OSM, keeping in mind that preventing  touching existing buildings as much as possible. 
We will recheck all changesets that have conflicts between our new roads and existing buildings. However, there are cases that the existing buildings are not digitized at correct location and we have no choice but accept crossing some buildings b/c we are now focusing on updating roads, not buildings, and hoping someone will correct the building in the future.
Finally, thank you for your comments, and I hope that we have more discussions when running this project
Fizzie-DWG (2024-07-13 01:03:25+00:00): Thank you for that. As above, you are required to follow the mentioned procedures for Organised mapping & importing data. What are the Sources you have mentioned, & are they licensed in such a way that the data can be used in OSM?
thangqd (2024-07-15 07:14:50+00:00): Thank you for your response.
We are using the road network for rural areas - DRRP, downloaded from https://geosadak-pmgsy.nic.in/opendata/. However, we don't use it to directly import to OSM (if there is a way to do that, and we haven't tried this yet), because we understand the potential topology errors when bulk importing data to OSM, especially the road network. So we don't choose bulk import approach but update it one by one using the DRRP road as a custom basemap. We will study your link https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing to understand, follow and apply it strictly to our updating strategy and guideline.
Thanks and best regards!
Thunder08 (2026-01-30 23:57:38+00:00): Я б не назвав це полагодженням. Видалені теги buildings у будівель. І до того, що будівля все одне позначена, як школа, ви створили ще й точку з аналогічною функцією. 

Все не так робиться. якщо школа займає не всі приміщення, то з будівлі на точку потрібно було перенести теги, а не дублювати. Ну і тег Buildings ні у якому разі не видаляти, бо при видаленні це вже не рахується спорудою, а лише зоною, ділянкою.
pluton_od (2026-02-02 17:55:08+00:00): Thunder08, де ви бачите це? У цій зміні я тільки замінив `amenity=townhall` на `amenity=school` https://osmcha.org/changesets/153836321.
Dimitar155 (2024-07-12 05:20:34+00:00): Източник: https://clubz.bg/75941-koy_e_mihalaki_tashev_pitayte_stolichna_obshtina
mcliquid (2024-07-12 08:32:06+00:00): Warum werden diese Objekte erfasst? Warum werden sie nicht gelöscht?
Der Überprüfbarkeitsgrundsatz (auch „On-the-Ground-Regel“ genannt) ist der zentrale Grundsatz des OpenStreetMap-Projekts. Etwas, was in OpenStreetMap erfasst wird, muss vor Ort so beobachtbar sein. Nur äußerst wenige Informationen werden zusätzlich erfasst, obwohl sie oft nur schwer vor Ort beobachtbar sind, z.B. Gemeinde-, Schutzgebiets- und Postleitzahlbezirksgrenzen.

Wenn ein Objekt vor Ort existiert und gesehen wird, kann es erfasst werden. Sollte seine Nutzung durch die Öffentlichkeit beschränkt oder nicht gestattet sein, wird das durch zusätzliche Attribute erfasst. Damit ist das Objekt so erfasst, wie es der Realität entspricht.

Die Erfassung der Daten erfolgt dabei von öffentlich zugänglichem Grund aus oder mittels Luftbildern, sowie in weit geringerem Maß aus lizenzkonformen Übernahmen von Fremddaten. Über allem steht die objektive Überprüfbarkeit, d.h. die Erfassung soll nicht von Spezialwissen des Erfassers abhängen.

Anwendungsbeispiel: Ein Privatweg, der von niemandem außer dem Eigentümer benutzt werden darf, wird als Weg erfasst, der zusätzlich das Attribut `access=private` trägt. Anwendungen, die OpenStreetMap-Daten nutzen, sind dazu angehalten, diese Attribute auszuwerten und keinen Routen über diesen Weg zu berechnen.
OSM_1975 (2024-07-12 08:53:29+00:00): Vielen Dank für die ausführliche Erläuterung! Werde das zukünftig sehr gerne so handhaben und berücksichtigen!
mcliquid (2024-07-12 08:56:02+00:00): Zur Ergänzung in diesem Fall: Mit dem Lifecycle-Prefix "not:highway" oder auch "removed:highway" oder "disused:highway" - je nach dem was zutrifft - ist der Weg nicht mehr in den Karten / Routingsoftware sichtbar, aber im Editor noch als graue Linie vorhanden. Das verhindert ein wiedereinfügen per Luftbild in der Zukunft. Ein "access=no" wirkt hier meistens nicht so gut. Viele Grüße!
OSM_1975 (2024-07-12 09:22:10+00:00): Super, vielen Dank für die Hilfe!
NorthCrab_upload (2024-07-12 05:30:16+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/287046809

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
user_177389 (2024-07-12 06:08:38+00:00): reverted
tordans (2024-07-12 05:33:09+00:00): Quelle: https://x.com/efesce/status/1811031936397086840/photo/1
mcliquid (2024-07-12 08:34:12+00:00): Hallo, warum hast du die Hausnummer 2/1 wieder entfernt?
hlfan (2024-07-13 20:00:12+00:00): Steht da wirklich ein Schrägstrich auf dem Hausnummernschild oder hast du nur unit=1 übersehen?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153838418
hlfan (2024-07-13 20:08:22+00:00): Ist wohl ein OSMI-Fehlalarm...
https://c.osm.org/t/osmi-misformatted-housenumber/81269/5
dypa (2024-07-12 09:15:08+00:00): Добрый день, для чего вы дублируете своей правкой уже существующий туалет https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/187142181 ? Прошу вас исправить дублирование.
P130_85 (2024-07-14 18:20:17+00:00): La rue Octave de Rochebrune ( ainsi que la rue du Gros Noyer) ne devrait pas être classée en highway=tertiary. Cette rue est très étroite, Deux véhicules ne peuvent se croiser dans certains endroits et le trafic est très faible, essentiellement par de riverains. le trafic venant d'Auzay passe en priorité par la rue de Grissais.
MacDony (2024-07-15 06:00:21+00:00): Bonjour,
J'ai fait les modifications
Ne pas hésiter à modifier si j'ai oublié quelque chose
Bonne journée,
Denis
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2024-07-13 10:09:09+00:00): Hi, 

1) opening hours follows a specific syntax

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours

you can validate it here

https://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/?setLng=en

in this case the correct value is "May-Jun"

2) 
description=Torn
leisure=park
name=Jaapani lillevaatlusplatvorm

this polygon is really strange. Viewing platform is probably not a park and it shouldn't duplicate the tower node. I suggest you delete it and leave tower

3)
tower:construction=puit
Most tag values should be in English, unless it's about names or descriptions. This is also more like a material, not a type of construction.
sheldonelectric (2024-09-19 19:05:35+00:00): Hey there, you had added ~600 points with no tags at all. I deleted them.
42429 (2024-09-20 19:23:21+00:00): merci bien / thank you
patzi (2024-11-28 15:41:20+00:00): this changeset added tons of untagged and unconnected nodes and duplicates i.e. of busstops it seems like it could be reverted in total or is there anything worth keeping?
A lot of the nodes are copies of nodes from existing ways.
patzi (2024-11-28 15:42:51+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156836014 already cleared up some of this
sheldonelectric (2024-11-28 15:44:36+00:00): please delete what i've missed.
patzi (2024-11-28 15:49:34+00:00): Another partial clean up https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153842027
42429 (2024-11-28 16:06:05+00:00): Vielen Dank / thank you. Der gesamte Changeset (Straßenverlauf von 1796) war für Openhistoricalmap geplant, ist aber versehentlich bei OpenStreetMap gelandet. Eigentlich kann der gesamte Changeset HIER gelöscht (und DORT behalten) werden. 
https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/#map=11/51.8578/10.3848&layers=O&date=1841-12-10&daterange=1824-01-01,2024-12-31
patzi (2024-11-28 16:10:46+00:00): Cleaned up the rest in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159709708
LouisXIV (2024-08-20 14:39:11+00:00): I disagree with your smoothness rating.
First, this is a tag for tracks, and these are paths, but anyway, the smoothness is really good, certainly not reserved for heavy off-roader. It's easily rideable by MTB bikes or elderly people. I changed your "horrible" to "bad".
Znaika (2024-07-12 10:13:48+00:00): Hallo Aleks,
was heisst es?
Darf wikipedia Schlüßel mit  https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jan_Palach
nicht rein?
Gruß,
Znaika
Znaika (2024-07-12 10:15:45+00:00): oder so?
wikipedia=de:Jan_Palach
Znaika (2024-07-12 10:17:58+00:00): Ahhh, ich sehe 
du hast eine Relation erstellt
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17827898
Aleks-Berlin (2024-07-12 16:38:15+00:00): Hallo Znaika,
1. Straßensegmente sollen als Relation zusammengefasst werden.
2. wikipedia=de:Abcd (nicht http..)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:wikipedia#Bevorzugtes_Tagging
Wenn du weitere Fragen hast, versuche ich gerne zu helfen.
MfG, A.
Leo Slager (2024-07-12 21:57:34+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-10 02:02:39+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164747914
Leo Slager (2024-07-12 22:25:01+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community