piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Metzor (2023-09-22 04:16:04+00:00): Hi Maps1GIS

Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-) 

One general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: 

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

 Why? Have a look at the section 
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

Please also habe a look at this page as you use StreetComplete:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/StreetComplete/FAQ#A_changeset_made_with_StreetComplete_covers_a_massive_area%2C_why_is_this%3F_How_can_it_be_prevented%3F
bxl-forever (2023-09-22 08:25:37+00:00): This changeset contains one small change in Iceland and one in Romania, which should have been uploaded separately.

If you have already started tracing on two separate locations, you can easily do this in JOSM: Select one part of your changes, then hit File > Upload selection. ;-)
Maps1GIS (2023-09-26 17:18:05+00:00): Hi bxl-forever and Metzon, thanks for catching this! My intention was to keep these edits as separate changesets but it appears I have uploaded them together.
I appreciate the information and will be mindful of this going forward. Happy Mapping!
woodpeck_repair (2023-11-14 13:31:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 144011037, 144011002, 144010984, 144011043 where the changeset comment is: revert edits des users Zinkeisen
arthurd_geovelo (2024-02-08 14:57:48+00:00): Bonjour Lisapple!
j'ai rajouté dans la rue du président de gaulle j'ai rajouté trois groupes d'arceaux, six au total. sur votre contribution-ci : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11209070166#map=19/46.67119/-1.42446
mes sources ne confirment pas ce groupe unique de six.
les auriez vous regroupées?
cordialement,
arthurd
Lisapple (2024-02-11 19:52:17+00:00): Bonjour arthurd,
Je confirme bien que l'été dernier, il y avait trois "stands" (sorte d'agrafes en métal) sur la chaussée (sur une ancienne place de parking) entre l'entrée du Musée de la Roche-sur-Yon (à l'est de la boutique "Cavavin") et l'horodateur au coin de la Rue du 11 novembre.
D'ailleurs, il y avait déjà aussi le "stand" (d'une capacité de 2) en bas de l'Orpi que vous avez rajouté (node/11598655994). Je m'étonne de ne pas l'avoir déjà rajouté moi-même au même moment.
Bien sûr, ça a peut-être changé depuis l'été dernier. Comme je n'ai pas prévu de retourner à La Roche prochainement, n'hésitez pas mettre à jour ou supprimer ma modification en fonction de vos relevés.
Cordialement.
marczoutendijk (2025-09-23 18:18:39+00:00): building=4
What is that supposed to indicate?
MaestroKissaki (2026-03-31 16:58:13+00:00): apenas hoy leo esta nota. no sabia como ubicar donde estaba el error que usted indicaba,  la respuesta a su pregunta "What is that supposed to indicate? " es nada, fue un error, yo me pase por alto la combinación de tag (building=yes +  building:levels=4) ya lo agregue como debe ser.
user_17551983 (2023-12-21 19:18:48+00:00): hallo, deine url zum PDF funktioniert nicht mehr. wo gibts die karte sonst? in lanis wird das gebiet zB. nicht als NSG eingetragen. nur so aus neugierde...
limes11 (2023-12-21 23:13:03+00:00): Das ist ein Naturwaldreservat, die sind nicht in LANIS, sondern auf den Seiten der Landesforsten. Hier z.B.

https://fawf.wald.rlp.de/de/forschung-und-monitoring-unsere-aufgaben/naturwaldreservate/schaffung-netzwerk-nwr/uebersichtskarte/gruenberg/

Ich hatte in diesem Changeset nur den leisure-tag entfernt und die Schutzgebietsklasse sauber erfasst. Der tote Link ist da schon seit 11 Jahren. 

Viele Grüße
user_17551983 (2023-12-22 07:05:04+00:00): danke! den toten link darfst du dann aber gerne auch löschen bzw. durch den mir geschickten ersetzen. 
-gruss
limes11 (2023-12-22 08:18:11+00:00): Du hattest keinen Link geschickt. Habe jetzt den obigen gesetzt. VG
dypa (2023-10-02 11:07:34+00:00): и зачем было удалять пруд,  площадку для выгула собак и скейт парк которые существуют на местности?
Константин Гам (2023-10-02 16:15:25+00:00): Насколько я увидел, едучи по аллее славы вечером, там стройка на всей этой территории. А поскольку стройки на карте не было в данном месте, я счёл объекты не актуальными.
dypa (2023-10-03 09:42:54+00:00): на территории благоустройство, второй этап. вернул все на место, в том числе и парковку, обрисовал по плану благоустройства. если собираешься уточнять на местности границы - то с текущей скоростью работ стоит приезжать к ноябрю, а не к планируемой дате открытия.

FYI https://mapwarper.net/maps/76765
Константин Гам (2023-10-03 11:29:24+00:00): Но это неверно, если стройка, я не могу попасть в скейт плазу, обьекты должны быть помечены как proposed или construction, по стройке гулять нельзя
Константин Гам (2023-10-03 11:30:19+00:00): Мы планы не обрисовываем, тем более не ясно что там по правам авторским, мы рисуем с местности. На местности там стройка. Фото есть скейт плазы той же? и того что я могу на неё попасть прямо сейчас и сегодня?
dypa (2023-10-03 12:06:55+00:00): объекты существуют на местности, до сентября любой мог без проблем подойти, проехать к ним и даже пользоваться ими, эти объекты уже построены! и поэтому их ни как нельзя сделать proposed или construction. по стройке передвигаться можно рабочим и они могут по ней гулять, очень странный аргумент, что по стройке нельзя гулять.
dypa (2023-10-03 12:07:12+00:00): объекты существуют на местности, до сентября любой мог без проблем подойти, проехать к ним и даже пользоваться ими, эти объекты уже построены! и поэтому их ни как нельзя сделать proposed или construction. по стройке передвигаться можно рабочим и они могут по ней гулять, очень странный аргумент, что по стройке нельзя гулять.
Константин Гам (2023-10-03 13:05:08+00:00): Я, как пользователь, могу со скейтом туда прийти и кататься? Аргумент в том что объекты внутри стойки, такое принято отмечать как объекты в процессе стройки тоже, чтобы не смущать пользователей
dypa (2023-10-03 13:45:21+00:00): можешь если сможешь найти путь который не будет лежать через забор. пример совсем рядом через жд есть футбольное поле в "крестах" и там будет такая же логика, физически объект существует, но проходимых путей к нему нет. взять мячик и поиграть выйдет если сможешь "попасть" через забор. похоже мы на разные вещи обратили внимание при этом обсуждении. давай еще раз вернемся к исходной проблеме, она в том что физически существующие объекты были удалены.  выше написано "обьекты должны быть помечены как proposed или construction, по стройке гулять нельзя" - я ожидал именно такое улучшение, но ни как не удаление.
Константин Гам (2023-10-03 14:24:15+00:00): Я просто этих объектов на местности не увидел, за тракторами и и бытовкой, если не изменяет память
Константин Гам (2023-10-03 14:25:07+00:00): И, на практике, шанс, что ранее существовавшие объекты останутся без изменений, маловат. Когда капиталят сквер, старое сносят.
Константин Гам (2023-10-03 14:25:37+00:00): Скиньте фото пожалуйста, как выглядит скейт площадка на сегодня, через забор сделать то его не сложно
StC (2024-11-01 13:28:42+00:00): hello ! je vais pouvoir vérifier sur place cet après-midi :-D
gendy54 (2024-11-01 14:39:33+00:00): Je ne crois pas avoir laissé de notes à cet endroit.
StC (2024-11-29 18:17:16+00:00): Non, tu as juste corrigé des choses. Mais je trouvais amusant de marcher sur un itinéraire que tu avais mis à jour, dans un endroit assez improbable.
Carto_Ferret (2023-09-22 18:46:04+00:00): Correction: Source used was Maxar SecureWatch Imagery 2023-05-06; Strava.
Jakka (2023-09-22 05:44:18+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Tag:barrier=bollard
Door het paaltje veranderd niet noodzakelijk type van de weg naar living_street.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:living_street 
Voor paaltje een node met bollard erop. en de highway teru zetten als voordien. Lukt het niet laat iets weten.
Steven Bloeyaert (2023-09-23 13:25:56+00:00): Dat stukje straat is idd een "woonerf" geworden... DAt is geen "highway" meer
Jakka (2023-09-23 19:21:37+00:00): Thx voor update
DressyPear4 (2023-09-22 15:38:47+00:00): Olá, mais atenção como é classificado o local, obviamente não é uma edificação nem gera energia
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141579991
Robert Whittaker (2023-10-11 12:33:22+00:00): Hi John,

In this changeset, you appear to have added emergency=defibrillator and defibrillator:location=* tags to the cycleway https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28851463 . Presumably this wasn't intentional, and those tags should have been added to a separate node somewhere.

Could you take a look and see if you can fix it? Many thanks!
John Stanworth (2023-10-11 17:51:23+00:00): Well spotted Robert. Thanks. Don’t hesitate to correct or change or revert anything else I’ve done like that - I don’t mind  :)
BCNorwich (2023-09-23 08:05:38+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Thanks for your first contribution to the world's best map. Unfortunately, you made a couple of highway duplications. I've made some amendments to the junction, please have a look to make sure there are no more problems.

Regards Bernard.
rivermont (2023-09-25 01:56:06+00:00): Why did you remove the descriptive names? These full names are listed on the route schedules at https://www.appalcart.com/route-maps-and-schedules and probably also on the physical route pamphlet.
Hugoren Martinako (2023-09-22 08:36:49+00:00): Ouuuh yes! The strava heatmap! I didn't realise about that. I was checking the https://discover.maxar.com/ imagery catalog but they were too blurry or cloudy. Neat!
birdlawyer (2023-09-22 21:35:10+00:00): Hello Hugoren Martinako, yes Strava is an excellent resource in OSM. Happy Mapping!
Glassman (2023-09-23 01:42:43+00:00): #TIP: the school name nodes are redundant. The school grounds are already tagged with the names of the schools.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141580756
user_1566574 (2023-09-27 15:38:53+00:00): Ah je suis deg, j'ai eu l'info il y a 3 jours d'une boîte à livres dans la commune, je me suis tout juste tapé 50 bornes en vélo, j'ai du demander à 2 personnes, juste pour que je me rendre compte que tu as mis à jour le POI une semaine avant moi... 🤣
Syl (2023-10-10 16:22:32+00:00): Désolé pour le déplacement pour rien.
C'était au moment où j'ai découvert qu'on pouvait utiliser Bing Streetside pour contribuer. J'avais donc testé en vérifiant les cabines téléphoniques.
user_1566574 (2023-10-10 17:40:05+00:00): Ah oui on peut ? 😃

Non t'en fait pas, ça fait une histoire drôle et le coin est sympa ;) Merci de tes contribs !
rhtb0 (2023-09-22 04:23:46+00:00): 새로 개통한 도로에 opening_date를 start_date로 변경해주시면 감사하겠습니다.
rhtb0 (2023-09-22 04:25:29+00:00): 아 그리고 아직 개통하지 않는 도로는 access=no, 개통 후 access=no를 삭제해 주시기 바랍니다. 이유는 이미 개통한 도로로 인식해서 개통 전에 길찾기가 작동하기 때문입니다.
rhtb0 (2023-09-22 04:34:04+00:00): 사실 이렇게 실제 개통 전에 바꿔버리는건 이미 개통한 것으로 인식해서 별로 추천하지는 않습니다. 계획이나 설계중, 공사 이전 단계는 highway=proposed, 착공 후 공사 중은 highway=construction 태그를 붙여야 합니다.
Weathering (2023-09-22 04:46:07+00:00): 향후 편집에 있어 내용 참고하도록 하겠습니다.
도움 주셔서 감사합니다!
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-10-05 17:09:39+00:00): Desfiz as novas vias que você incluiu aqui: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141582604 , pois estavam totalmente fora da realidade. Pude verificar com a camada Strava, se quiser mapear novamente mas correto utilize o tutorial: https://erickdeoliveiraleal.medium.com/tutorial-camada-strava-openstreetmap-josm-ou-id-55ec4aa44f2d
bxl-forever (2023-10-01 22:05:02+00:00): Hello,

Why did you add a bakery in the middle of the sea?

Please be aware that what you do inside your app gets pushed to the main OSM databases.  Bad contributions like this will make your other contributions look suspicious.

I will revert this one.
adambyte (2023-09-22 03:00:47+00:00): I gave the bus stops separate "public_transport=stop_position"s in order to put "direction=forward" on them, because of how the routes confusingly loop back on themselves here.

I think it's also worth signposting that I don't know how (if at all) "public_transport=stop_area" relations should be used here.
adambyte (2023-09-22 04:16:56+00:00): I left the train area alone because I don't know much about train-related best practices yet. That said, we might want to delete the train station node, and move the stop positions.

And while I'm on the subject of the train area, the new underground passages leading there still need to be mapped.
MxxCon (2023-09-23 23:32:41+00:00): Hello.
Do you know website for this thing? I haven't been able to find it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141584006
brandonbds (2023-09-24 13:55:18+00:00): It’s rather confusing. The website for the former venue still seems to work. Perhaps they haven’t finished the transition yet.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141584006
felipeeugenio (2023-09-22 11:15:58+00:00): Hola Javier.
Si termina un landuse y comienza otro, y realmente están contiguos, entonces dejarlos pegados, pero dejaste el residential y el contruction entrelazados. Intervenir eso después es un poco caótico..
saludos.
ChrissW-R1 (2025-04-27 17:22:34+00:00): Please check https://osm.org/note/4730835
adreamy (2025-04-29 02:41:31+00:00): Thanks for the report.
But this is not a zipline.
It's a line that allows you to grab and pull a boat without using oars.
willkmis (2023-09-22 13:58:46+00:00): Hello, please note that Windsor Square is already mapped as a node: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7304762329, which is more typical for neighborhoods in the area. Also, by deleting landuse=residential from the polygon, you have removed information about the landuse from the map. In my opinion this should be reverted. What is your source for these edits?
Best,
Will
Aleksey Gorelikov (2023-09-25 06:08:13+00:00): Hi willkmis, Thanks for your help in this case, I missed that it was a node, the edit was reverted. Regards, Aleksey
compdude (2023-12-17 08:31:38+00:00): You do realize that the highway=motorway tag is for freeways with no at-grade intersections, right? This stretch of Hwy 19 has at grade intersections and should not be a motorway.
DaveF (2023-12-03 11:09:07+00:00): Hi
Please don't duplicate railway=station tags. There should only be one per station.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3704548353
user_5359 (2023-09-22 06:28:50+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I remove your SEO SPAM entry (mostly wrong keys). Please have a look on https://wiki.osm.org.
felipeeugenio (2023-09-22 11:13:12+00:00): Hola Javier.
Por favor cuidemos la ortografía. Por favor agregar los tildes. Para alguien que mapea tanto como tu ya debe ser un requisito.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141585444
nick-28 (2023-10-09 19:09:38+00:00): Hallo FNKE,

sehr schön, dass Du die Polizeistation an ihren neuen Ort gebracht hast. Wäre aber gut, wenn Du dann auch die Adresse entsprechend anpasst!

Gruß, nick
woodpeck_repair (2023-11-07 00:01:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 143714106, 143714111 where the changeset comment is: revert von edits eines users nach selbstlöschung
mcliquid (2023-09-22 06:51:29+00:00): Hallo, zu diesem Changeset passt diese kurze Diskussion im Forum: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/zahlreiche-anderungen-von-attributen-bicycle-no-und-mtb-scale-geloscht/95895
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141586538
bernardo60 (2023-09-22 23:57:02+00:00): Danke Dir für den Hinweis auf das Forum. Sehr interessant die verschiedenen Sichtweisen, und ich traf "alte Bekannte" wie extremcarver wieder. Es gibt wohl keine eindeutige Entscheidung, was die mtb scale auf verbotenen Wegen angeht. Also ich kennzeichne Wege nur dann als verboten, wenn ein eindeutiges Fahrradsverbotsschild zu sehen ist - also nicht bei einem allgemeinen Verbot. Und dann hat die mtb-scale nichts zu suchen, denn mal Hand aufs Herz, sie ist für MTBer gedacht, die das Gebot umgehen, auch wenn es Stimmen im Chat gibt, die das Gegenteil behaupten. In der Zukunft werde ich allerdings davon absehen, und es der local community überlassen. Eine andere Frage: welches Tool benutzt Du, um auf Kartenveränderungen in Deinem Gebiet aufmerksam zu werden? Ich "betreue" sozusagen meinen Hinterhof in Bali und entdecke oft falsche Inputs Monate zu spät. Übrigens wirst Du Dich mit meinem Input in Österreich nicht mehr herumplagen müssen - bin wieder weg!
mcliquid (2023-09-22 06:44:14+00:00): Hi,

Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-)

One general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
Marek-M (2023-09-22 09:47:54+00:00): Thank you for your edit. Please, try to upload changes in smaller area. Your changeset boundary affected about 10 countries, but you just added 1 POI in Lietuva and 1 POI in Italy :) Best regards :)
syntheticsolace (2023-09-25 15:41:02+00:00): Spam
user_5359 (2023-09-22 06:03:06+00:00): wrong change set comment (lost focus of input field): typo notes
osmviborg (2023-09-22 06:18:44+00:00): In DK use SDFI luftfoto. Unfortunately those in ID are outdated. Sneep peek at the new ones: https://listservices.dataforsyningen.dk/#/map/WMS/orto_foraar_temp
Anton_Klebanovich (2023-09-22 09:16:17+00:00): Hello! Thanks for your feedback, I'll take that into account in the future.
user_5359 (2023-09-23 06:01:30+00:00): Revert nicht erlaubte Quelle siehe Diskussion https://www.osm.org/changeset/141590814
tg4567 (2023-10-06 07:26:22+00:00): Is there a reason the wikimedia commons tag was deleted from Columna Olimpica?
michael_ua (2023-09-24 18:50:22+00:00): Reverted in

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141695466
user_5359 (2023-09-23 06:00:55+00:00): Revert nicht erlaubte Quelle siehe Diskussion https://www.osm.org/changeset/141590814
user_5359 (2023-09-23 05:59:55+00:00): Revert nicht erlaubte Quelle siehe Diskussion https://www.osm.org/changeset/141590814
user_5359 (2023-09-23 05:59:22+00:00): Revert nicht erlaubte Quelle siehe Diskussion https://www.osm.org/changeset/141590814
Luzandro (2023-09-25 11:21:03+00:00): Hallo,

du hast hier segregated=yes + foot=yes entfernt bzw. foot=no gesetzt. Es mag zwar von der Beschilderung zutreffen, dass dort ein reiner Radweg verläuft, solange aber nicht gleichzeitig stattdessen parallele Fußwege angelegt werden, ist das Fußgängerrouting jetzt komplett kaputt und ich würde vorschlagen, einfach wieder segregated=yes + foot=yes wiederherzustellen, was der Situation vor Ort entspricht.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_foot&route=48.21850%2C16.39025%3B48.21781%2C16.38992
bernh (2023-09-25 12:06:49+00:00): verstehe. Danke für den Hinweis, ich habe meine Änderung rückgängig gemacht
user_5359 (2023-09-23 05:58:42+00:00): Revert nicht erlaubte Quelle siehe Diskussion https://www.osm.org/changeset/141590814
user_5359 (2023-09-23 05:58:00+00:00): Revert nicht erlaubte Quelle siehe Diskussion https://www.osm.org/changeset/141590814
Gazer75 (2023-09-22 08:07:03+00:00): Du vart advart... Reverted og blir meldt til DWG for vandalisme.
Stalker61 (2023-09-30 19:09:21+00:00): Здравствуйте.
Имя собственное уже с большой буквы, или плохо видно?
Mir76 (2023-10-02 10:47:27+00:00): Имя собственное человека видно, А имя  собственное населенного пункта (Москва, например) - плохо видно.
osmviborg (2023-09-22 07:05:12+00:00): Please use SDFE aerial imagery in DK
APneunzehn74 (2023-09-22 14:03:03+00:00): Ok, thank you. I'll have to look at a few things at home after the bike trip.
Greetings APneunzehn74
map per (2023-09-22 07:00:50+00:00): Richtiger CS comment:  crossing in tram_crossing und level_crossing in tram_level_crossing geändert
bxl-forever (2023-09-22 08:20:59+00:00): Nice try but look more closely at the border.  This house is in Flanders.  I fixed its outline based on GRB.
rskedgell (2023-10-25 12:54:56+00:00): You appear to have tagged a section of Blachford Road as foot=no in response to a StreetComplete task asking "Are pedestrians forbidden to walk on this road here?"

I'm cannot find any street side imagery  with an OSM-compatible licence to check that there really is a (signed) pedestrian prohibition here. If there are no TSRGD diagram 625.1 "pedestrians prohibited" signs on the imagery, then it is very unlikely that a prohibition exists.

The wiki states that access tags reflect legal access, not whether it would be pleasant, a good idea, safe, etc.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:foot

As real pedestrian prohibitions on public roads other than those tagged as highway=motorway or motorroad=yes in the UK are quite rare and are always signed, this quest is probably better left disabled.
eggie (2023-09-22 08:08:01+00:00): Dag Tom.. Volgende keer graag het BAG adres intact laten. Dat is er vast nog wel.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=141590630

MVG
eggie
user_5359 (2023-09-22 19:38:52+00:00): Revert Diskussion siehee https://www.osm.org/changeset/141590814, Änderung https://www.osm.org/changeset/141618713 und https://www.osm.org/changeset/141619312
Discostu36 (2023-09-22 14:26:33+00:00): Besteht eine Freigabe für die Nutzung der Daten?
quantenschaum (2023-09-22 14:53:28+00:00): IMHO ja, "Lizenz: Dieser Datensatz kann gemäß der Nutzungsbestimmungen für die Bereitstellung von Geodaten des Bundes genutzt werden." https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/geonutzv/GeoNutzV.pdf
quantenschaum (2023-09-22 14:58:24+00:00): Abgerufen von  https://gdi.bsh.de/mapservice_gs/NAUTHIS_Hydrography/ows?SERVICE=WMS&VERSION=1.3.0&REQUEST=GetCapabilities
Discostu36 (2023-09-22 15:23:29+00:00): §3 wird von OSM nicht eingehalten, weil die Quellenangabe nur am Changeset vorhanden ist. Siehe dazu https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Licence_Compatibility. Die Ergänzungen müssen alle rückgängig gemacht werden.
quantenschaum (2023-09-22 18:36:35+00:00): Ja, dann tu das bitte, wenn du es für nötig hältst.
user_5359 (2023-09-22 19:18:35+00:00): Datensatz gelöscht..
user_5359 (2023-09-22 19:39:10+00:00): Revert Diskussion siehee https://www.osm.org/changeset/141590814, Änderung https://www.osm.org/changeset/141618713 und https://www.osm.org/changeset/141619312
willkmis (2023-09-22 13:54:23+00:00): Hi, Santa Monica Place is the name of this mall complex. I don't think it's really the name of the pedestrian walkway through the mall. What is your source for this change?
Best,
Will
Olga_Kovalevskaya (2023-09-25 06:21:37+00:00): Hi! Thank you for paying attention to this edit. We made this edit based on this source (https://data-usdot.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/usdot::north-american-roads/explore?location=34.013318%2C-118.493409%2C20.02). We believe that the path that runs through the shopping center may have the same name.