piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Xvtn (2024-04-02 15:07:03+00:00): Hi! You may consider improving the tagging here even further by moving the Navajo name to its own tag. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multilingual_names. Fortunately when we move to vector maps on osm.org soon, we'll be able to set the preferred language for all features! That'll be cool.

Anyway, in this case, I believe that would mean the following additional tag:
name:nv=Tse’Bii’Ndzisgaii

Let me know if you have any questions, and thanks for your contributions!
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-22 17:25:11+00:00): Hello!

You used
place=plote
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1266924849/history

Have you maybe meant
place=plot
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?
literan (2024-03-28 17:25:03+00:00): это не отель. на сайте указано, что это апартаменты
tekim (2024-03-28 14:29:08+00:00): Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap (OSM).  Thanks for submitting your edits to the map.  Unfortunately, we are not allowed to use Google Maps when editing OSM due to Google's terms of use.
tekim (2024-03-28 14:29:49+00:00): This is being reverted because it used a source that is not allowed.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149272206
ibanez (2024-04-03 13:32:39+00:00): Ich bin da gestern 2.4.24 langgefahren. Bitte Sperrungen vor Ort prüfen und dann erst mappen, nicht aus Pressemeldungen abschreiben. Gruß Jens
Bitnik (2024-04-03 20:37:59+00:00): Hallo Ibanez, danke für den Hinweis und das Entfernen der Sperrung in dem Bereich. Auch heute (3.4.24) war der Bereich noch passierbar. Hatte mich von den bereits aufgestellten Umleitungsschildern an der Ebsdorfer Landstraße am Ortausgang Lüneburg leiten lassen. 

Ja auch auf die Baustellinfos des Landkreises sollte ich mich nicht verlassen. Gruß Geerd
user_11609320 (2024-03-27 21:21:59+00:00): the hoa also restricted overnight  parking on Foxborough
mcliquid (2024-03-28 07:54:38+00:00): Which prohibition sign is used here to prohibit bicycles? I don't know of any sign here.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25583129
tekim (2024-03-28 14:26:24+00:00): Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap (OSM).  Thanks for submitting your edits to the map.  Unfortunately, we are not allowed to use Google Maps when editing OSM.
tekim (2024-03-28 14:26:58+00:00): This is being reverted because it used a source that is not allowed.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149272068
silversurfer83 (2024-03-28 17:40:04+00:00): Gude Frank :)

guck dir bitte mal diesen Artikel im Wiki an und dann diese Ladestation. Passt das?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen

cheers
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149244260
JeroenHoek (2024-04-02 13:28:10+00:00): Hier lijkt net als in Harlingen sprake te zijn van een privéweg waar bezoekers gewoon welkom zijn. access=permissive dus. Is je duidelijk hoe je artikel 461 in OSM kan toepassen?
JeroenHoek (2024-04-02 13:29:48+00:00): Lees deze comment even:

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/private-wegen-in-openstreetmap/96708/31
dentonny (2024-04-07 17:29:13+00:00): hi, 
are you sure about the location about the sump_buster? Because there is already one tagged over here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11573558161
Massamino (2024-04-23 19:25:47+00:00): Yes, it was there in the past, but if you drive on the retieseweg, you can see the bump from the street. I will keep an eye on it when I pass there again to be sure.
Massamino (2024-04-23 19:27:01+00:00): Sorry, Geelsebaan over there :)
rivermont (2024-04-03 16:50:02+00:00): Can you elaborate what you mean by "2 track added"? No features were added here, and no tracks were touched at all.
SteMue (2024-06-14 11:47:36+00:00): Was soll dieser Eintrag?
Es gibt keine Radwege, auf denen man nicht mit dem Radfahren darf.
Entweder ist es ein Fußweg oder ein Radweg.
Entferne bitte den Hinweis, "Absteigen! Dismount! Walk for Cyclists through Station Hall"
Das gehört nicht nach OSM, das ist keine Erziehungsplattform, sondern eine Weltkarte.
Tatfahren (2026-07-16 07:24:34+00:00): Derjenige den du hier des Eintrags beschuldigt, kann nichts dafür, sondern hat nur mit StreetComplete das Material der Oberfläche bestimmt.
stillhart (2024-08-01 20:52:32+00:00): Am I wrong or does this segment not exist anymore?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1105778207
captain_slow (2024-08-02 05:26:15+00:00): Hallo stillhart
Danke für den Hinweis, ich habe mir das vorher angeschaut und diese Verbindung ist tatsächlich nicht mehr da. Ich habe das entsprechend angepasst: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154718720
stillhart (2024-08-02 09:17:06+00:00): 👌Danke viel mals. Bin da durch gefahren und wurde über diese nicht existierende Strasse navigiert. Habe mich aber gefragt wie temporär das ist :-)
NeisBot (2024-04-07 11:04:02+00:00): Hello Emirdoski79, thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.Please see https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 

Thanks!

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
CurlingMan13 (2024-03-28 00:57:15+00:00): Descriptive names should not be used for the cartpaths.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149245878
Xvtn (2024-03-28 15:56:41+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes. Everything seems great to me! Only issue is that you removed a restaurant tag from the nearby Little Dom's. Looks like another mapper already came through and fixed that!
Anyway, Cheech's tags look great. Thanks for your contribution!
NorthCrab_upload (2024-03-27 23:20:33+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2552429422
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/354521516

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1266788998

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
WMietek (2024-03-28 06:27:28+00:00): Poprawiłem. Mój błąd błąd.
NorthCrab (2024-03-28 07:09:12+00:00): Błąd to bardzo negatywne stwierdzenie :P Ja uważam że co najwyżej przeoczenie. Nie jest łatwo wychwycić wszystkiego tego typu problemy. Pozdrawiam!
NorthCrab_upload (2024-03-27 23:51:30+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"osiedle Piotruś Pan":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11767566704
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11767566705
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11767566753
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11767566754

"Majora Sucharskiego":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11767566743
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11767566752
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11767566803
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11767566804
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11767566808
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11767566809

"Ceynowy":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11767566854
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11767566900

"osiedle Józefa Dambka":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11767566857

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
G_P_J (2024-03-31 19:49:08+00:00): Poprawione.
Leo Slager (2024-04-06 21:27:17+00:00): Hi Jeroen,
Kun je eens naar deze opmerking kijken:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4185898
Is er bezwaar tegen om vehivle:backwards=no te verwijderen ?
JeroenvanderGun (2024-04-06 21:34:49+00:00): Er zit hier een vrij complexe combinatie van verkeersborden en onderborden aan beide zijden, als je vehicle:backwards=no weghaalt, klopt het geheel niet meer.

Is dit niet een bug in de navigatiesoftware? Volgens https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Conditional_restrictions#Evaluation_of_conflicting_restrictions zou moped=yes voorrang moeten hebben op vehicle:backward=no.
Xvtn (2024-03-28 15:51:38+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Since you requested a review, I looked over your recent changes. Looks great! I don't see any issues. Thanks for your contributions!
Xvtn (2024-03-28 15:52:42+00:00): Oh, I forgot to mention - One suggestion is that the changeset comment should be used to describe what changes you made. (The justification is fine to have in addition, but the primary reason is to summarize what you changed.)
blackboxlogic (2024-03-31 22:20:53+00:00): I see you're doing a lot of road class changes (and I assume you're going to do MANY of these, because Maine needs it). Could you briefly describe your methodology for choosing class?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149247314
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-03-31 23:17:42+00:00): I was only doing it for dead-ends. I have no plans to do a more comprehensive overhaul.
Baloo Uriza (2024-06-21 19:27:59+00:00): Is that a name, or is it a ref?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149248572
map per (2024-03-28 11:20:15+00:00): Wegen review_requested:
Die Änderung sieht gut aus, danke!

Ist das ein öffentlicher oder ein privater Spielplatz? Dann könnte ich noch access=* eintragen.
engelmarkus (2024-03-29 22:17:45+00:00): Der Spielplatz ist meines Wissens privat.
map per (2024-03-30 07:30:33+00:00): Danke, hab access=private eingetragen
TrickyFoxy (2024-03-29 06:49:20+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149297433
TrickyFoxy (2024-05-14 22:46:48+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151334657
hoserab (2024-03-28 03:57:29+00:00): I can definitely corroborate that the #43 bus route is completely different now, and the #143 no longer exists. Significant changes to the Calgary Transit bus routes were made circa 2018-2020; many long-time routes were eliminated or changed entirely after the newer "MAX" BRT routes went into service.

You can trust the Calgary Transit website to be up-to-date.
CurlingMan13 (2024-03-28 16:10:37+00:00): Welcome to OSM!  I concur that this is not a park.  Thank you for your edit.

It was likely added for Pokemon go.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149249294
CurlingMan13 (2024-03-28 16:22:32+00:00): I have gone through and removed the other edits by the user who added this fake park.  :)

Thanks again!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149249294
M141 (2024-03-28 21:44:14+00:00): Funny you mention Pokémon Go; that's why I'm here. I didn't know how to check for other edits so thanks for getting those!
CurlingMan13 (2024-03-28 16:10:17+00:00): Welcome to OSM!  I concur that this is not a park.  Thank you for your edit.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149249336
mini-me (2024-04-29 13:21:24+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11768031730
Зачем эта точка? Это один посёлок
5HFIYL5W4O (2024-03-31 05:14:32+00:00): salah tempat
tastrax (2024-03-29 04:42:07+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
LockOnGuy (2024-03-29 03:19:39+00:00): Please stop this vandal behavior. These are building ruins are still on the ground for tens of years. 
They are built in a pattern to resemble the name of the former Iraqi president Saddam Hussain yes, and yes by current law anything anything that encourages or glorifies the previous regime is banned, but those buildings ruins are still on the ground, so the reason "A name banned according to Iraqi laws" is not a justified reason to remove those buildings.    
You had removed those buildings multiple times now, and I hope this one is your last.
LockOnGuy (2024-03-29 03:19:23+00:00): Please stop this vandal behavior. The name of the brownfield is correct and unchanged since 2003 as the project stopped and abandoned. Yes by current law anything anything that encourages or glorifies the previous regime is banned, but since the name is not changed, we can not remove it and as it's still on the ground, in signs, banners etc. so the reason "A name banned according to Iraqi laws" is not a justified. You had removed the names multiple times now, and I hope this one is your last.
emersonveenstra (2024-03-28 11:31:15+00:00): Hi there,

What is https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17398721 supposed to be?
tbart1 (2024-03-28 14:20:24+00:00): I believe just the fairway on hole 19 -- however I remember the relation thing popping up and I couldn't figure out how to get rid of it. If that is marked in addition to the fairway, deleting it would be fine. Sorry about that, new to the system.
emersonveenstra (2024-03-29 13:08:05+00:00): no problem! I removed it
tekim (2024-03-28 14:21:30+00:00): Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap (OSM).  Thanks for submitting your edits to the map!  Unfortunately, we are not allowed to use Google Maps when editing OSM due to Google's terms of use.
tekim (2024-03-28 14:22:10+00:00): This is being reverted because it used a source that is not allowed.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149271840
fortera_au (2024-03-28 07:31:07+00:00): Are you able to explain why you’ve dropped the main road out of a town from primary to tertiary?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149252903
slice0 (2024-03-28 07:38:03+00:00): reasons are in the changeset history above, thankyou.
slice0 (2024-03-29 00:19:52+00:00): @fortera_au as you also have a strong recorded history of purposely and incorrectly removing my edits, citing false reasons which I have a list of. Can you please seek a public consensus in the OSM community forums if you wish to make any changes to my classification changes of which are within the OSM wiki guidelines and based on fact and personal experience.
slice0 (2024-03-29 00:31:32+00:00): https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/user-fortera-au-who-has-incorrectly-policed-many-of-my-edits-in-the-past-and-has-made-false-allegations-against-me-is-now-questioning-my-classification-edits/111105
fortera_au (2024-03-29 09:58:24+00:00): Considering the roads placement within a smaller, close to country town, those factors are less important in determining a roads classification. If you actually took into consideration the roads use, positioning, compared it to other roads nearby, and even just observed those roads, they’d be more than a tertiary road. They’re the main roads connecting the town to highways, main roads northbound out of the town, and also the heavy vehicle route out of the town.
aharvey (2024-03-31 04:59:32+00:00): I don't have any local knowledge here, but the physical attributes here are less important (and are mapped as their own objects or tags on the ways for data consumers to consider), based on importance in the road network with this road appearing as the main connector to the town tells me it should have a high classification.
slice0 (2024-03-31 05:18:18+00:00): @aharvey road classifications in Australia are very open to interpretation, nothing you have listed in your comment correlates to any information in the OSM wiki or previous discussions regarding road classifications please move the conversation to the community forum if you wish to have a proper discussion
slice0 (2024-03-31 05:21:07+00:00): you are also part of fortera discord army and fortera has falsely claimed many of my past edits have been "illegal" and "invalid" when that have not been. id take forteras opinion with a grain of salt at this point. he is also the reason why we cant use any official data australia wide which makes it even harder to classify roads correctly. thankyou
slice0 (2024-03-31 05:27:03+00:00): every single time forteras has a fit about the way roads have been classified the "discord army" of opinion always move the goal posts in his favor as shown by what aharvey is doing.
slice0 (2024-03-31 05:54:49+00:00): 1 single fact that I can tell you is that this road IS NOT a major arterial road or major highway which is why I removed the "primary" classification to start with. Aharvey if you think that primary classification is correct then you are actively sabotaging the project in order to back up your mate in an argument and nothing more. Read the wiki for primary roads
slice0 (2024-03-31 06:07:16+00:00): if we are allowed to use bylaws as stated in the Primary wiki then is should be classed as Secondary, but our DWG member will ban people for doing that, so we have to improvise, dont you get it?
slice0 (2024-03-31 06:48:22+00:00): I made a new diary entry https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/slice0/diary
habi (2025-04-10 13:56:02+00:00): Ciao Pan
Here you've added a bunch of `roof:shape=gab` to entrances, which is most probably a copy-paste error.
I removed those values (and the non-necessary `source`) in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164770628
Happy mapping,
habi
tordans (2024-04-04 14:24:25+00:00): Hallo ischieferdecker, danke für deine Ergänzung! Du hast um eine Review gebeten. Mir ist aufgefallen, dass du "playground:theme=playground" verwendet hast. Das wird zwar vorgeschlagen, ist aber als Angabe quatsch (es ist ein historischer Datenfehler, der nicht vorgeschlagen werden sollte). Es wäre besser, das zu löschen. Wenn du Lust hast, kannst du noch die Spielgeräte eintragen https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:playground — eine gute App dafür ist https://every-door.app/ — Frohes Mappen!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149253152
ischieferdecker (2024-04-10 12:55:38+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis und viele Grüße.
Tommybara (2024-03-28 21:32:14+00:00): Please stop adding place names that no longer exist. You are creating a very huge mess.
Ng Quang Trung (2024-03-28 23:55:21+00:00): This is not a mess. These are long-standing names still attached to these areas that are still used for surrounding public works
Tommybara (2024-03-29 01:42:21+00:00): Then simply mapping those “public work” objects and name them is perfectly enough. Drawing them as place nodes is wrong because they no longer exist administratively as place names. Adding those place names as labels of several wards creates a worse mess.
LorenzoPesci (2024-03-28 21:36:44+00:00): Bosco italia non è un nome generico, è un bosco appositamente piantato anni fa a forma di Italia su un versante che guarda il Pian grande e perciò chiamato così
impiaaa (2024-03-28 16:49:16+00:00): wikidata=* is to say that the tagged object is exactly the same as the object on Wikidata. I don't think it's possible for an initiative to exist physically, and I also don't think this traffic sign is where they headquarter. However, the sign does have Solar America Cities branding on it, even though Solar America Cities is not commercial. brand:wikidata was correct.
Black_Diamond (2024-03-28 19:27:05+00:00): Fair point. I reverted the change.
Frans S (2024-03-28 09:08:26+00:00): Hello. See my comment on your other changeset.
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149253997
Frans S (2024-03-28 09:21:22+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Rather inaccurate mapped.

Buildings are mostly rectangular (draw it with 4 nodes ).

Buildings not squared.


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149254059
Frans S (2024-03-28 09:12:37+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping. 
you just mapped a few short pieces of a path. Try to expand the path till it goes over the edge of the task or can connect to other highways.
btw. The tag footway is not to be used here. The path is recommended.

Please read this article.
Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
One of the validator jobs is to reviews the taggings of highways .  Experience earns that traces of highways are regularly wrong tagged.

How to decide when a trace is a path or an unclassified highway (main choices in rural areas)
First, look what they connect.  Houses, settlements, villages. Then measure the width of that trace.

In iDeditor 

Shortcut : Ctrl+⇧ Shift+M – toggle  opens measurement panel
Draw a line between the shoulders of a trace (zoom in very far) and read the distance.
If a trace is max 2 meters wide, tag it as a path.
Wider and connect hamlets, houses and villages should be tagged as unclassified.
Tag residential in urban areas (villages, towns)

In JOSM, use the measure tab or, draw a circle (round building, shortcut Alt-Z when the building plugin is installed)) between the shoulders of a trace and read the distance on the lower toolbar. (don't map that bulding)

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/East_Africa_Tagging_Guidelines
This is mentioned about tracks on the
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Routing#Routing_considerations

Quote: Tracks are roads of agricultural purpose. They usually connect fields to farms. The surface sometimes makes them inaccessible for regular cars, or at least limits the speeds to a very slow pace. Tracks should always be avoided for through-going traffic or within urban areas.

Best regards
Frans S (2024-03-28 09:04:23+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Oversized mapped. 

Included the shadow of a building as well.


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149254326
Frans S (2024-03-28 09:06:27+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Rather inaccurate mapped.
Combined 2 buildings.
Connected nodes of buildings to each other.
Buildings not squared.


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149254340