piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2024-05-15 12:26:41+00:00): Van Gelder Groep zit aan de 

Sluiswachter 18
3861 SN Nijkerk ?

Op welk adres zit Van Gelder Nog meer?
eggie (2024-05-15 12:30:50+00:00): Naam =nederlands aangepast naar Van Gelder Installatietechniek en samengevoegd met adresnode nr 1. 

MVG
eggie
yrtimiD (2024-05-17 00:14:40+00:00): Hello and welcome! The residential landuse you added is too much inaccurate. It can't be just a straight block and usually shares sides with nearby areas like industrial
SimonPoole (2024-05-15 12:00:57+00:00): This was in Turgi, Baden, not in Windisch
mcliquid (2024-05-15 12:49:21+00:00): Hi Arabela,

first of all: Thank you for your contribution!

I wonder if this bottle return machine is really in the middle of a residential street?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2035484724

And in general please note: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:web to
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
mcliquid (2024-05-22 17:36:59+00:00): I've removed the bottle return machine here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151688647
MxxCon (2024-05-16 02:43:52+00:00): Hello.
What did you mean here by setting hours to 00:00-00:00?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151357680
Shandhivya (2024-05-16 05:22:37+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151357696
CasGroenigen (2024-05-16 06:29:31+00:00): Thank you. Did I acidentally ask for review?
jqngarcia (2024-09-03 06:10:46+00:00): No es parking oficial, es la parada del bus
hashhar (2025-08-25 12:17:34+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1283257846#map=16/28.42542/77.10481&layers=N doesn't seem to actually be a powerline. Should it be removed?
sahilister (2025-08-27 18:15:20+00:00): Looks like part of this powerline is actually gone. Seem to have been mapped 16 years ago via https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30431583/history/1 . Rapid Metro came online ~12 years ago which may have lead to removal of part of the section (or moving) some of it. 

Atleast, I can say some towers exists after Sector 55-56 metro station on ground. I'll try if I can find others and truncate the powerline accordingly via local survey.
literan (2024-05-15 19:39:39+00:00): не надо отрисовывать уже снесенные дома на стройплощадках
bxl-forever (2024-05-15 12:52:46+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM.

I reviewed your first contribution.
Sure, there is no dedicated cycle lane but unless paintings were removed very recently I see cycle logos for cyclists using it contraflow.

Cycle logos or V-signs are coded as "shared_lane" in OSM.  This tag is important for cycle routing apps because some navigation algorithms give a slightly higher value to this situation, over streets without any infrastructure at all.  We use "cycleway=no" when there are absolutely no markings at all.

Do not worry, we took care to fix the tags here.

(My comment is based on Mapillary pictures taken in May 2023 here: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=808044510683164 and on UrbIS aerial imagery taken around June 2023; had the situation changed recently, please let me know if I am mistaken.)

Have a nice day.
Philip Amaral (2024-05-15 13:17:12+00:00): Thanks a lot! It's my first time using OSM myself (though I have colleagues at my job that use it a lot more). The reason I tried making a change on this segment is because I saw an new tool done by another organisation that very useful provides an index of the percent of inhabitants living near protected bikeways. I looked at the Brussels Region and my neighbourhood and noticed that a part of Avenue des Bardanes is designated as having a protected bikeway, when I know that isn't true. That's why I tried making a change. Contraflow cycling is allowed and there's probably one or more sharrows painted on the street, but no protected bikeway. 

Anyway - thanks for checking!
Philip Amaral (2024-05-15 13:18:21+00:00): this is the tool by the other organisation: https://atlas.itdp.org
bxl-forever (2024-05-15 13:37:36+00:00): Thanks for the link.  I didn’t know about it.  It looks like they manually copied OSM data, sometimes very roughly because in many places, in particular in this street, it does not match data we have here.  I guess the confusion is because there is a tiny protected lane near the intersection with Zavelenberg, which they might have assumed to be a "protected bikeway" stretching over the whole street.  I’ll try to see if I can find how to report mistakes on their website, because as long as OSM is concerned, our data seems to be correct.
Thanks for raising the issue.
orthocircular (2024-05-15 20:19:03+00:00): Hi! Thank you for adding your business to the map. Please avoid promotional details in changeset messages, descriptions, etc: it clutters up the map if every business makes its name "McDonalds Burgers Portland The Best Burger You'll Ever Eat" (the description field exists for crucial neutral details like "A plaque about the battle that was fought here in 1848" or "Only accessible if it hasn't rained lately" -- info that travelers and customers need to have popped up in their face, and definitely not SEO stuff.)

Also beauty shops are a really vague category, given that you're an RN performing "med spa" type procedures and not really the same category as Sally's or Ulta I've modified your listing to be more like a dermatology clinic. We can modify as needed for the best fit but nothing's ever perfect (Rex Burger and McDonalds probably don't want to be in the same category yet here we are!)

Finally I've added your Salem location and cleaned up your opening hours to follow OSM syntax so it shows properly in apps: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151379938

Some things that might be helpful to add to both locations are the level tag (0 is ground or first level, 1 is the first level above ground aka second floor, 2 is the what we'd call the third floor, etc), wheelchair access tags, etc, since I know the Commercial location looks a little complex.

Cheers and thanks again!
mueschel (2024-05-16 12:23:41+00:00): Hi,
it seems you're doing a large scale import of shop nodes?

There are several tags that need to be edited:

- 'description' with a long advertisement text - the description tag is not meant for that, it should be used to describe the specific POIs only.

- 'contact_facebook' is not used anywhere up to now. The correct tag is 'contact:facebook'.

- the 'operator' tag contains quotation marks which should not be there.

- your changesets miss information about the documentation and the sources of the import.

Please read the OSM import guidelines: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
Shandhivya (2024-05-16 05:17:44+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151360196
HellMap (2024-05-15 16:46:32+00:00): Hi!

Thanks for your changes!

I made some corrections. I will mention the most important ones below.

It is best not to connect wood and grass areas to other ways - they don't actually overlap roads, footway surfaces and similar (such as where asphalt begins). For example, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1282893931 . You should also be careful not to connect them at random points - if in doubt, leave a gap to the way. Not all areas need to connect with point - only those that logically of physically connect should. For example, a park can have wooded areas or grass areas, etc.

Wood areas should also be used only for significant tree cover rather than sparse occasional trees like around https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1283272978 . And areas like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/688335881/ are definitely not wood. Similarly, areas like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/688335891 are not parks, just small grass patches.

Paths like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1283271204 should connect all the way to roads, otherwise they will not work with routing software.

There are a lot of things to cover, so let me know if you have specific questions.

Cheers
drazde (2024-05-18 20:13:01+00:00): amenity=bus_station andrebbe per una stazione non per una fermata.
In più la fermata era già mappata correttamente

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=bus_station
drazde (2024-05-18 20:16:59+00:00): Ma le stai rimappando tutte cosi????
Ma sei sicuro???
Shandhivya (2024-05-16 05:14:05+00:00): Thank You For your mapping, please square your buildings after tagging them by pressing ‘q’ on your keyboard. Keep up the mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151361706
eggie (2024-05-15 14:36:05+00:00): Dag luccajan..
Wat tips.
..foot=designated hief je niet te taggen.
Het is default.
..motor_vehicle en horse=no kan ook weg.
Mvg
eggie
eggie (2024-05-16 06:56:07+00:00): default accesstags verwijderd
mueschel (2024-05-16 09:19:46+00:00): Hi,
you used the tag 'tiktok' here. This is not used in other places. Could you change this to the common 'contact:tiktok' tag?
Dimitar155 (2024-10-13 14:45:21+00:00): Hey Evgeniya,

In this changeset you've added a few dozen `not:brand:wikidata` tags which match the values of `brand:wikidata`. Can you fix it?

Happy mapping,
Dimitar
Dimitar155 (2024-12-18 16:15:28+00:00): Hey Eveniya, Any chance to fix the issue in the near future?
Evgeniya_rocketdata (2024-12-19 06:25:06+00:00): Hi! Yes, we have planned the edits tomorrow.
Dimitar155 (2024-12-21 17:04:26+00:00): Thank you! For the record, the fix was applied in changeset/160425485.
osmviborg (2024-05-15 13:49:20+00:00): Villaveje har navne, altid.
DaveF (2024-05-16 06:27:59+00:00): Hi
Welcome to OSM.
FYI there was already a railway=station object.. I've made appropriate amendments to the train station building & node.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151391310
Shandhivya (2024-05-16 05:10:54+00:00): Thank you for mapping. The mapping looks great and also the changeset comments. Keep up the mapping - many thanks! #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151362532
spiregrain (2024-05-15 16:22:05+00:00): Are you quite sure this is a motorway?  Asking because in the UK roads thst are called "motorway" have a reference number like M11, which the North Circular does not.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151362568
Miner The Miner (2024-05-15 21:05:17+00:00): I changed it to a motorway because it is a limited access freeway, and I though that it was the correct classification.
TomH (2024-05-16 12:18:54+00:00): So are some trunk and primary roads but it doesn't make them motorways - there are well established standards for road tagging in the UK and this is not correct.
gurglypipe (2024-05-16 12:36:49+00:00): See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Roads_in_the_United_Kingdom
Paul Berry (2024-05-16 15:05:44+00:00): If there's one thing we have absolutely covered mapping-wise in the UK it's all the motorways. There are some edge cases, such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1599716561, but all major routes were fully mapped over a decade ago.
Shandhivya (2024-05-16 05:09:24+00:00): Thank you for mapping. The mapping looks great and also the changeset comments. Keep up the mapping - many thanks! #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151362721
NeisBot (2024-05-16 05:14:50+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151389364
Syl (2024-05-15 14:22:44+00:00): Bonjour, il y avait déjà un arrêt Plantevin un peu plus haut (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2757342932), est-ce que ce serait le même ?
ild (2024-05-15 14:46:03+00:00): Bonjour, ah oui, bien vu, je vais le deplacer l'ancienne, et supprimer celle-ci
gileri (2024-05-18 15:48:54+00:00): Hi, is this church really mostly appartments ?
Zekovski (2024-05-19 15:52:04+00:00): Indeed I don't think it is. I will remap it as building=yes.
NeisBot (2024-05-15 14:10:05+00:00): Hi Daksh2009, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/352742571

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
NeisBot (2024-05-16 05:13:47+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151389343
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-16 05:14:01+00:00): Please don't add fake beaches to OSM!
Nielkrokodil (2025-02-04 20:23:27+00:00): Hallo,
du hast am Augst Trail ein foot=no eingetragen. An den zwei Wegabschnitten https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1190136440 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1190136439 aber nicht. Hast du die eventuell übersehen? Wahrscheinlich gilt auch dort das Gehverbot, nehme ich an.
arjunaraoc (2024-05-23 09:19:14+00:00): How is  name of village with V useful?
shinjiman (2024-05-17 01:16:18+00:00): Looks like the road next to Bayswater Station is connected directly to Railway Parade rather than Rose Avenue by survey outcome.
rund (2024-05-17 12:39:31+00:00): No it connects to Rose Ave, road signage on Beechboro marks it as Rose Ave. I’ve lined it up the best I can using Nearmap
shinjiman (2024-05-20 03:52:52+00:00): okay got that, as the newly built road is very close to the Railway Parade intersection. :)
richlv (2024-05-30 16:58:52+00:00): Sveiki, pamanīju, ka dažas ēkas diezgan šķības, piem., https://imgur.com/a/bHahzPc .

Ja tas noticis tādēļ, ka pieejamie ortofoto nav bijuši pietiekami labi, noteikti vērts pāriet uz LVM uzturēto LĢIA slāni - tas ir šobrīd vislabākais visā Latvijā pieejamais ortofoto ar ļoti labu precizitāti.

Šīs ēkas nedaudz pielīdzināju, iezīmēju pāris trūkstošas - ja redzamais ortofoto nesakrīt ar te iezīmēto, tas nav īstais :)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/56.89211/25.03000&layers=N
somehundred (2024-05-30 17:56:52+00:00): Es pārsvarā zīmēju no Esri, jo gandrīz visur Esri ir paši jaunākie attēli. Man nepatīk Esri sliktā kvalitāte, zinu, ka mūsējais Ortofoto ir pašā augstākajā kvalitātē un ar to būtu patīkamāk kartēt, taču, lai kartē nejauši neiezīmētu vecus elementus, izmantoju Esri. Daudz esmu saskāries ar gadījumiem, kad ēka, kas eksistē Ortofoto ir nojaukta Esri. Nejauciet ar Esri clarity, to es nekad neizmantoju.
somehundred (2024-05-30 18:15:10+00:00): Esri īstenībā rāda ortofoto no diviem laika periodiem. Ļoti liels tuvinājums automātiski pāriet uz ļoti vecu ortofoto, kamēr ne tik tuvs, normāls, tuvinājums rāda ortofoto, kas jaunāks par lvmgeo ortofoto. Arī šis ir ļoti kaitinoši, taču tam var pielāgoties.
HellMap (2024-05-31 09:47:12+00:00): Pieminēšu, ka ESRI mazākā tuvinājumā ārpus lielajām pilsētām izmanto tās pašas bildes, ko Bing un Mapbox - laikam Maxar satelītus. Tikai viņiem nobīdes dažādas pēc procesēšanas.
somehundred (2024-05-31 10:42:08+00:00): Tiešām, HellMap! Šķiet, šo jau biju pamanījis agrāk, taču īsti nebiju pievērsis uzmanību. Bing ir nobīde, tāpēc es to arī neizmantoju.

Starp citu Rīgā visjaunākais ir Esri. Apskatiet šo https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/158290993 stadionu galvenajos 4 ortofoto piedāvājumos (LĢIA, Esri, Bing, Mapbox) un redzēsiet, ka Esri ir vienīgais ortofoto, kas rāda atjaunoto stadionu. Šo stadionu atjaunoja daudzus gadus atpakaļ. Un vēl šis https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1220453782 Lidl. Ortofoto rādās mašīnu veikals, bet Esri tas jau ir nojaukts.
HellMap (2024-05-31 10:59:29+00:00): Jā, manā komentārā jau bija pieminēts "ārpus lielajām pilsētām" ;) Cik es zinu, satelītu tuvās bildes ir ļoti dārgi taisīt un licenzēt, tāpēc faktiski tas notiek tikai blīvi apdzīvotās vietās. Es neesmu skatījies konkrēti, kur vēl ir sīkā izšķirtspēja, bet iespējams tikai Rīgā. Mazākas izšķirtspējas ir kā kur. Piemēram Ogrē https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1183977191 Esri ir jaunāks satelīts par Bing, bet tikai no lielāka attāluma.
richlv (2024-05-31 17:22:40+00:00): Jā, tas noteikti ir super, ja pārbauda, kurš ortofoto slānis ir jaunāks.

Ja tam ir nobīde vai ne tik laba izšķirtspēja, tad gan ir vērts pielāgot LVMa versijai - vai nu uzzīmējot objektus citā slānī un tad pielīdzinot precīzajam, vai tam citam slānim uzliekot pareizu offset/nobīdi.

Lai svaigi iezīmētais būtu ilgstoši pietiekami precīzs :)
rowcherryrow (2024-05-16 20:49:50+00:00): Correction: Source used was Bing aerial imagery; Strava
silversurfer83 (2024-05-15 18:49:58+00:00): Moin luk323 :)

wer darf denn da lang? Oder: GIbt es Schilder?
(weil ein ganz allgemeines "access=no" wie hier gerade ist schon eher selten)

cheers
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151363847
luk323 (2024-05-22 09:29:26+00:00): Am Weg steht vorne ein Schild mit dem Text: „Privatgrundstück- begehen und befahren Verboten“
silversurfer83 (2024-05-22 09:54:44+00:00): Danke für die Rückmeldung.

Dann kommt da, wo grad ein "no" steht ein "private" hin.

Cheers
Hufkratzer (2024-05-15 22:17:08+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1019565744 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1283289605 lookmore like riding arenas than like riding centres. In OSM riding arenas are usually tagged leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian. The tag leisure=horse_riding is for the whole facility, in this case it could probably be added to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/128328961. Compare
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a#Riding_centre_(equestrian)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1220983615#map=18/10.42636/-66.80207&layers=P
https://www.facebook.com/clubhipicocaracas
Hufkratzer (2024-05-15 22:20:59+00:00): Sorry, there is a wrong link in what I wrote; it should have been: The tag leisure=horse_riding is for the whole facility, in this case it could probably be added to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1283289617


"
pantufla (2024-05-17 06:50:43+00:00): You're very right. I've done it too quick based on the editor and not checking the wiki. At least not a baseball field anymore.

Now it's been corrected.

I've used leisure=horse_riding together with club=social since it's kind of both at the same time
pantufla (2024-05-17 06:51:34+00:00): Vielen vielen Dank :)
NeisBot (2024-05-15 14:35:05+00:00): Hi Beanzzzz, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1283290240

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
NeisBot (2024-05-16 05:15:28+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151389375
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-16 05:15:35+00:00): Please don't add fake beaches to OSM!
osmviborg (2024-05-15 14:59:40+00:00): Ikke adresser på bygninger, tak. Slettet.
DeFra85 (2024-05-26 16:19:35+00:00): Ahoi, sind die beiden Fußwege (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1209115513, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/950139308) auch baulich von der Straße getrennt, z.B. durch Begrenzungspfosten?
Wenn Nein, sehe ich das als falsch an. Dann müsste das ein sidewalk:right=shoulder sein
NeisBot (2024-05-15 14:40:07+00:00): Hi Spinda, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/266944650

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
NeisBot (2024-05-16 05:16:45+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151389402
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-16 05:16:58+00:00): Again, please don't add fake beaches to OSM!
jcarlson (2024-05-28 15:12:09+00:00): a couple of these farmland areas were multipolygons with only a single outer ring. not sure how you managed that in iD, but be careful. a multipolygon can be valid for these kinds of features, but you'd expect there to be some kind of inner ring, like a hole punched out or something. since these were just simple areas, they should have been closed ways, not relations.
NeisBot (2024-05-15 14:40:07+00:00): Hi Beanzzzz, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1283292705

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
NeisBot (2024-05-16 05:16:04+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151389387
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-16 05:16:09+00:00): Please don't add fake beaches to OSM!
NeisBot (2024-05-15 14:45:05+00:00): Hi Spinda, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1283293339

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
NeisBot (2024-05-16 05:17:22+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151389417
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-16 05:17:28+00:00): Please don't add fake beaches to OSM!
VictorIE (2024-05-23 19:45:56+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11907283535

Are you happy with door=revolving and wheelchair=yes ?
Own Oh (2024-05-24 09:29:46+00:00): Well there are two entrances alongside each other: a revolving one and a swing door with a wheelchair sign. Should I differentiate with 2 nodes?
VictorIE (2024-05-24 09:55:15+00:00): That can be done, similar to these.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11929327792
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11929327793
Own Oh (2024-05-24 09:58:12+00:00): Good so, will adjust, TY
Thales Alcântara (2024-05-16 19:09:07+00:00): oi, boa tarde! que bom ver mais alguém ainda alterando alguma coisa em itapipoca aqui no openstreetmap! notei que vc delimitou o fim do bairro violete na rua murilo de sousa braga, que de acordo com o site oficial dos correios, ainda é considerado o bairro coqueiro, e também, de acordo com o site e com o senso comum da população, o quarteirão do danuzão é do cruzeiro. mas isso são apensas detalhes, obrigado pela sua contribuição!