piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-21 19:58:00+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/182380304/history has 1=1 key that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What you intended to express by using this unusual key? Is this tag needed? Or maybe can it be expressed in a more typical way that would be easier to understand?
Saikat Maiti (2024-02-07 11:14:42+00:00): Hi oxygenre, Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap. I have found that you deleted many buildings which are visible from Satellite Imagery and re-added a few, rather than deleting it, you can use the same polygon and modify it correctly.
Please remember to square the building (shortcut is "Q", if the buildings a adjoint, select all the adjoint buildings to square it) to keep a good shape and draw the building individually at your best.

Learn more about the OpenStreetMap editing here (https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/)
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147128425
recrayon (2024-02-29 03:31:32+00:00): Hi there, I'm pretty sure I did add the buildings, I made the edit to be reviewed. I have an old screenshot of the edit (probably).
recrayon (2024-02-29 03:33:39+00:00): here, https://imgur.com/a/gC9uHJ6 its a little pixelated
gelok (2024-02-06 20:30:06+00:00): It seems like you're asking for assistance with correcting a syntax error in a sentence that includes the keyword "https://thefarmmusic.com/". However, it appears there's a lot of repetition of question marks in your request.

Could you please provide the specific sentence or code snippet you need help with, and clarify what exactly you're trying to achieve with the inclusion of the keyword "https://thefarmmusic.com/"? This way, I can better assist you in correcting any syntax errors.
Ropino (2024-02-11 17:46:55+00:00): Hi,
if you correct keys: please correct also the value (not key only)
e.g.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1246268738
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1246276025
Thx in advance
dieterdreist (2024-05-21 15:28:06+00:00): this changeset is discussed here:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/revert-bulk-deletes-of-addresses-on-poi/113542
Warin61 (2024-02-08 00:00:21+00:00): Moved bus stop in relation for 166 route to correct position in the relation. 

In PTv2 ALL bus stops are placed before the ways. All of them. None of them go after the ways.
plennert (2024-02-06 15:49:01+00:00): Hallo,
warum wurde der key/tag gelöscht? Die Angabe stimmt doch.
mcliquid (2024-02-06 16:20:28+00:00): Hallo, ich hatte offensichtlich falsch verstanden, dass die Angabe veraltet bzw. nicht dokumentiert sei und deshalb "emergency=ambulance_station" vorzuziehen wäre.

Welche Bedeutung hat "emergency_service=ambulance" im Vergleich zu "emergency=ambulance_station"?

Und wenn es ein relevantes, aktiv genutztes Tag ist, warum ist es dann nicht korrekt dokumentiert?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Emergency_service
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:emergency_service%3Dambulance&action=edit&redlink=1
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/meaning-of-undocumented-emergency-service-values/108859

Danke dir!
MarinoBM (2024-02-08 12:35:17+00:00): Hola Shabook, Gracias por contribuir a mejorar el mapa. En los datos de OpenStreetMap no todas las calles tienen la clasificación de residencial. Siguiendo las directrices del Plan General de Ordenación Urbana del Ayuntamiento de Valladolid a las calles prioritarias se les asigna un valor superior.
Revierto los cambios.
Conjunto de cambios: 147216034
pitscheplatsch (2024-02-07 06:20:45+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147129845
pitscheplatsch (2024-02-06 11:52:25+00:00): Again: You should not do your testing @ production. 

Please have a look: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Using_the_dev_server

Thanks!
GinaroZ (2024-03-21 23:15:59+00:00): Hi, is this bit meant to be one way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1246822985 as it means no eastbound routing on a cycle path from York Place to London Road?
LateNightTone (2024-03-22 07:13:37+00:00): Hi, thanks for checking. Yes, it is meant to be one way - there is painted text on the cycle path at this point that says "no entry" in eastbound direction, and eastbound cyclists are forced to take the crossing. Painted lines and arrows reinforce this. Routing should direct cyclists onto the opposite carriageway.
LateNightTone (2024-03-22 07:27:26+00:00): (It seems strange I know - but it reflects what is on the ground.)
osmuser63783 (2024-03-25 09:43:10+00:00): Welcome to Edinburgh. It's meant to be two way now, but they forgot to burn off the no entry markings and to remove the sign that tells cyclists to cross and rejoin the carriageway. The Council are "continuing to investigate the safest and most practical way to remove" the no entry markings.

It used to look like this, with a left turn to cross and rejoin the carriageway:
https://twitter.com/CyclingAndyC/status/1684967512297938944

Now it looks like this, with a kerb blocking the left turn:
https://twitter.com/LeithFeederRide/status/1752633287141392647/photo/4

See also https://twitter.com/oldscotbooks/status/1752658019387687037
LateNightTone (2024-03-25 12:59:08+00:00): Oh, wow! That's a failure of pretty epic proportions, especially considering the timescales. Thanks for the background info!

I've updated based on those tweeted images (and another which shows updated routing of the crossing to the NW). I've also added notes to explain why the map doesn't match what's on the ground, and that the way is "due" to be relined...

Thanks for bringing it to my attention!
osmuser63783 (2024-02-13 00:12:07+00:00): Oops thanks for spotting that!
chris66 (2025-03-02 09:04:41+00:00): "Straße im Zuge der Brückensanierung vom 5.2. bis 14.11.2024 gesperrt"

Nun haben wir aber schon 03 / 2025

Grüße
Klusch (2025-03-02 14:42:38+00:00): geplant war bis Nov., wurde zunächst bis April 2025 verlängert, Termin ist jetzt unklar:
https://www.stadt-koeln.de/leben-in-koeln/planen-bauen/bruecken/62461/index.html
MxxCon (2024-02-09 07:09:56+00:00): Hello.
When mapping straight sidewalks there's no need to add intermedia nodes along the way. Ultimately it should be a straight way from curb to curb with only nodes present are intersecting with any other ways.
Also please remember to tag curbs. If you can not tell what kind of curb it is from satellite imagery, you can just tag it as a generic curb, and that will be prompt apps like StreetComplete to fill in the missing details for people who are on the ground and can survey it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147131144
NorthCrab_upload (2024-02-06 11:41:22+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Witkowskie":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/326157467
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/326157769

"Podbukowiec":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/326169240

"Błankowa":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/326197856

"Zapotok":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/326232396

"Borownice":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/326246375
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/326247019
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1095490334

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
confusedbuffalo (2024-06-04 08:24:24+00:00): You seem to have covered a huge area here.
I note https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1132974077 which I would definitely not describe as a track, having travelled on it myself.
Can I ask what led to these edits? As they do not seem to reflect how the highway tag is used for tracks and minor roads.
LuxuryCoop (2024-02-06 12:46:57+00:00): 오픈스트리트맵에 기여해 주셔서 감사드립니다!

다만 국토교통부의 측량 성과(VWorld 위성사진 포함)를 토대로 지도를 그리는 것은 '기본측량성과 국외 반출 금지(공간정보의 구축 및 관리 등에 관한 법률 제16조)'에 어긋납니다. 이 문제를 방지하기 위해 OSM 공식 홈페이지의 iD 편집기에서는 vworld 위성사진을 끌어 쓰지 못하도록 막고 있습니다.

OSM의 목적이 네이버 지도, 카카오맵 등과 달리 저작권 제약 없는 지도, 지도 국외 반출 금지와 같은 법적 제약이 없는 지도를 구축하는 것인 만큼 저작권적/법적으로 문제가 없는 정보를 토대로 지도를 그리는 것이 중요합니다.

읽어 주셔서 감사드립니다.

참고:
https://www.osgeo.kr/236
https://www.law.go.kr/법령/공간정보의구축및관리등에관한법률
tolio (2024-02-06 20:55:05+00:00): На страницата на куриера навсякъде пише BOX NOW, като отделни думи. Този ref номер 3779 не разбирам какво означава и къде го пише.
Dimitar155 (2024-02-06 21:25:57+00:00): Бях останал с впечатление че е една дума, но лесно може да се промени на Box Now. 3779 е номера на автомата в техния сайт. Този номер не се показва в сайта им и май не го пише на самите автомати (за разлика от автоматите на Speedy), но е публично достъпен чрез https://boxlockersloadfilesbg.blob.core.windows.net/lockerssmallnavigate/all.json. Имат и кратки линкове, които пращат чрез SMS при получаване на пратка (например https://l.boxnow.bg/3779). Някои онлайн магазини също показват тези номера, при финализирането на поръчките.
tolio (2024-02-06 21:48:50+00:00): Да, проверих си имейла и вайбър съобщението от една пратка и там го пише този номер. Интересно, че на страницата им го няма.
eggie (2024-02-06 13:01:59+00:00): Dag Harry  Wanneer LiveNav er wat mee kan lijkt het me oke.
Veel van die emergencytags zijn nog niet beschreven en/of geaccepteerd. 
Of LiveNav dan een langer voertuig dan 10 m hierover laat navigeren geen idee. 
MVG
eggie
harrypet (2024-02-06 13:06:07+00:00): Langer dan 10 of korter dan 8 meter? Ik ben ook benieuwd of deze tag werkt ;)
eggie (2024-02-06 13:10:11+00:00): Wat in ieder geval helpt is emergency=yes . Dat wordt ook wel op bruggen gezet met een max aslast  als brandweerwagens wel mogen passeren ondanks hun hogere aslast.
harrypet (2024-02-07 10:13:25+00:00): Het is gelukt dank.
Jakka (2024-02-06 17:00:46+00:00): les numéro des maisons ne sont pas "name" code mais ... addr:housenumber=* ajouter aussi addr:street=*
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:*
Zrop (2024-02-06 17:44:24+00:00): Hallo NRWPeter,

Du hast hier eine Solaranlagen https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11591523099 als Gebäude ("building=roof") mit "layer=1" eingetragen. Das ist so leider nicht korrekt. Solaranlagen die auf Hausdächern instaliert sind werden mit "generator:place=roof" getaggt, ohne "building=*" und "layer=*".

Dann noch kurz zur AOK https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11591523096. "opening_hours" (Öffnungszeiten) werden in einem festen Schema und mit englischen Werten angegeben, siehe
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening%20hours?uselang=de

Schaust Du Dir das bitte auch nochmal kurz an und korrigierst das, Danke.

Gruß
Zrop
NieWnen (2024-02-06 14:49:11+00:00): Proszę nie zmieniaj z takim wyprzedzeniem czasowym. Mają to zamknąć dopiero jutro. 

OsmAnd potrafi odświeżać dane co godzinę. Przynajmniej można było poczekać do północy, bo część narzędzi pewnie w nocy aktualizuje dane.

Takie zamknięcie byłoby dla mnie OK w terenach gdzie mapujących nie ma, ale w podwarszawskich gminach często czuwa po kilku mapujących.

Relacje autobusowe też trzeba przepiąć.
Sebastian | Yanosik (2024-02-07 07:09:54+00:00): W porządku.
Relacji autobusowych nie przepinałem, ponieważ w źródle nie było żadnych informacji jak będą wyglądały objazdy. Co prawda było tam wspomniane o objazdach, ale "załączniki" nie zostały wrzucone do tekstu i nie chciałem tego robić w ciemno.
dcapillae (2024-02-06 13:25:02+00:00): Buenas tardes.

Este conjunto de cambios fue revertido. La vía modificada corresponde con la parte de uno de los edificios de la Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud.

La Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud engloba varios edificios además de otras instalaciones. Se puede buscar por su nombre en el mapa: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/662737030

Si necesita ayuda para empezar a mapear, consulte la guía de principiantes: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide

Gracias por su colaboración.

Atentamente,

Daniel Capilla
eggie (2024-02-06 12:47:59+00:00): Beste Harry  Je hoeft niet aan te geven emergency=yes op reguliere wegen. Dat is default.
Wat is hier het probleem
Doe dat alleen als bv een access=private is getagd. Ik heb emergency=yes verwijderd.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Hulpdiensten

MVG
eggie
Jakka (2024-02-06 12:54:43+00:00): I ly a "brewery" et "bakery" dans meme bâtiment ?
Smile Kombucha (2024-02-06 12:57:14+00:00): Oui et même un atelier de pâtes à tartiner :)
woodpeck_repair (2024-02-13 14:36:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 147411925, 147411908 where the changeset comment is: Revert von Edits von Sockenpuppen eines Benutzers mit Hausverbot
VLD549 (2024-03-10 16:24:56+00:00): Hi,

Can you explain the name change Dongensekanaaldijk to Dongense Kanaaldijk?
All sites, including Wiki, https://wikimiddenbrabant.nl/Dongensekanaaldijk_(Tilburg), mention it as one word. 

Thank you
Marcel-NL (2024-03-10 23:04:07+00:00): Hi Tom. Name is based on the spelling on the street name sign (of which there are very few in this case, so it's hard to determine where street name starts and stops).
Regards, Marcel
VLD549 (2024-03-14 12:00:48+00:00): Ok, thank you.
VLD549 (2024-04-18 07:20:01+00:00): Hi again, could you provide with a source for the name change Dongensekanaaldijk to Kanaaldijk-Zuid across the water form Barge Terminal Tilburg all the way west passing the N260 and more? BAG indicates it to be Dongensekanaaldijk.
Thank you!
Marcel-NL (2024-04-18 08:41:14+00:00): Hi. Ok, I looked again and I created a picture that shows the street name signs. In between these signs, there is nothing which shows where one name strats and the other ends. The only thing I noticed is a change if asphalt color. Please see: https://ibb.co/983Wvsx
If BAG (which only registers addresses of buildings as far as I know) has an opinion of that, that would override my guess.
Marcel-NL (2024-04-18 09:01:15+00:00): I have looked at more online sources and concluded it would be a better guess to name the part between Flaassendijk and Mostheuvelpad "Dongensekanaaldijk". See: https://app.pdok.nl/viewer/#x=127214.57&y=401533.43&z=10.8000&background=BRT-A%20standaard&layers=f2437a92-ddd3-4777-a1bc-fdf4b4a7fcb8;wegvakken
Marcel-NL (2024-04-18 19:52:53+00:00): After discussion with @A67-A67 adjusted spelling of name.
plymothian (2024-02-06 18:37:45+00:00): Technically the turn restriction as now mapped stops anyone from North Road East from accessing Clifton Pl.   The junction is offset, but traffic from NRE is allowed turn left and right into Clifton Pl, only traffic from North Hill is banned.
It's not possible to map the restrictions here properly as there are are also no left turns for over 3.5t from North Hill to NRE and NRE to North Hill.
Syl (2024-02-17 09:49:30+00:00): J'ai annulé ce groupe de modifications, voir https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/ajouter-le-trace-de-communes-disparues/21113
eggie (2024-02-06 13:13:47+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
pitscheplatsch (2024-02-06 19:47:47+00:00): Hallo Fahrdienst365, willkommen bei OSM.

Was war genau in der gelöschten Relation enthalten? Leider ist die OSM API derzeit überfordert mir diese Frage zu beantworten. Die Versionsnummer 43 deutet daneben auf eine durchaus ältere Relation hin. Danke.
Hungerburg (2024-02-06 22:15:52+00:00): Hab probehalber revertiert und dann die Elemente heruntergeladen. Eine Sammelrelation, kein Wunder dass so viele Bearbeitungen. Übrigens erst eineinhalb Jahre alt. Meine Ansicht: Der Herr gibt und der Herr nimmt. Er weiß schon wie er heißt. Dazwischen ackern sich eine Menge Leute dran ab, vor allem der Herr selbst. Nicht schad drum, von Anfang an ein Schmarrn.
Fahrdienst365 (2024-02-06 22:38:02+00:00): Hierfür UMAP zu verwenden wäre wohl eine bessere Idee gewesen. Wenn du schon mal auf diese Region schaust, in Tiris finden sich einige Radfahrbeschränkungen die es in der Realität so nicht gibt. So auch hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27162240 Wird sich das mittels GIP Updates bessern?
user_20979216 (2024-02-08 20:15:14+00:00): Hallo Johann! Ist das Account Nummer 149?
Hungerburg (2024-02-11 12:23:16+00:00): Diese Relation braucht man nicht wiederherstellen. Ist eh schon wieder weg, kann das bleiben.
blacx (2024-02-07 15:59:51+00:00): Quan acavis de diubixar algo que te una forma quadrada o rectangular, (o nomes cantonades de 90º) prem la tecla "q", quedarà mes bonic i mes be
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147134966
XProXitaX (2024-02-07 16:18:44+00:00): M'ho apunto, gràcies!! :D
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147134966
eggie (2024-02-06 13:16:28+00:00): Dag Leon...   Welke bebording staat hier? Weet jij dat toevallig. 
Het is een mengelmoes van accesstags hier? 
MVG
eggie
Léon de Jong (2024-02-06 13:20:03+00:00): Voor de brandweer zijn wij een nieuw navigatiesysteem aan het testen. Deze maakt gebruik van OSM. Alleen deze straat specifiek voor brandweervoertuigen wordt niet goed herkend. Wij denken dat het komt omdat de snelheid te laag ingesteld staat. Daarnaast kan vanaf de Lingebrug zijde niet linksaf genavigeerd worden.
eggie (2024-02-06 13:20:45+00:00): Bij mijn weten staat hier een C1 bord 
In dat geval 
vehicle=no 
horse=no  
traffic_sign=NL:C1
en dan emergency=yes als de uitzondering.
eggie (2024-02-06 13:24:58+00:00): Je kunt komende vanaf die doorsteek vanaf de kazerne in OSM gewoon naar links 
. Wat is precies het probleem. 
.. Het navigeert niet omdat emergency=yes ontbreekt.
service-emergency_access is kennelijk niet voldoende voot LiveNav.
eggie (2024-02-06 13:26:44+00:00): Nogmaals  Ik denk da de tagging als de bebording niet veranderd is 
vehicle=no
horse=no
traffic_sign=NL:C1
en dan emergency=yes

moet zijn.  Met evt die service= emergency_access en de operator.
Een C1 bord geldt ook niet voor wandelaars.
eggie (2024-02-06 13:27:57+00:00): Hier wat leesvoer welke tags bij welke borden horen.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=NL:Overzicht_Nederlandse_Verkeersborden&direction=next&oldid=984258#C:_Geslotenverklaring

en nog wat info over emergencytagging
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Hulpdiensten
eggie (2024-02-06 13:30:58+00:00): Waar komt de eenrichting vandaan..  ?Welke bebording staat hier. Dan is het simpel aan te passen.
Léon de Jong (2024-02-06 13:40:32+00:00): Beide zijde van de weg zit een gesloten verklaring bord C1 deze weg is specifiek voor de brandweer aangelegd. Ander verkeer mag hier geen gebruik van maken.
eggie (2024-02-06 13:45:12+00:00): Oke...  Maar we mogen niet interpreteren.
C1 is zoals boven al genoemd
vehicle=no
horse=no
traffic_sign=NL:C1
en dan emergency=yes

Een C1 bord geldt niet voor voetgangers. 
oneway=yes eigenlijk alleen als dat staat aangegeven... Dat geldt dan ook voor de brandweer. Maar dat bord ontbreekt.
Pas je het zelf aan?
Al die tags over fietsers motorfietsen auto's en voetgangers kunnen weg.
vehicle=no vangt alle vliegen met wielen  in één klap.
eggie (2024-02-06 13:46:13+00:00): . en de algemene tag access=permissive moet zeker weg!
eggie (2024-02-06 14:04:29+00:00): Ik heb het aangepast zodat het voor hulpdiensten routeert van noord naar zuid. Is het werkelijk oneway=yes hier? 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-02-06 14:10:21+00:00): oneway = yes verwijderd. Laat maar weten of dat oke is.
https://smoothefiets.ddns.net/html/verkeersbordenkaart/index.php?lat=51.835916740&lng=4.978292584&z=19
Zrop (2024-02-06 18:48:33+00:00): Hallo NRWPeter,

auch hier hast Du ettliche Solaranlagen auf Gebäuden mit "building=roof" und "layer=1" gemappt.
Schaust Du Dir diese auch mal an und korrigierst sie.

Dann hast Du hier auch einige Gebäude mit "craft=yes" und "shop=yes" getaggt, wie z.B.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1246855304
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/936655576

Das ist leider nichtssagend, besser wäre es einen spezifischeren Wert zu verwenden.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:shop
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:craft

Und die Werte werden nicht in deutsch
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/450314496
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/450314516

sondern immer in englisch angegeben.

Gruß
Zrop
gileri (2024-02-06 20:13:07+00:00): Bonjour, c'est une voie verte, je ne crois pas qu'il y ait de sens de circulation affecté, même si en pratique la plupart roulent en effet dans le sens le plus logique.
vnourdin (2024-02-06 20:22:58+00:00): Bonjour, quand on arrive depuis "la route", il y a un panneau qui indique sens unique vers la gauche (en descente), il me semble qu'il y a aussi un panneau interdit pour l'autre sens mais je n'ai pas vérifié. En gros je dirais que sur le terrain c'est bien des sens uniques mais qu'en pratique les cyclistes (dont moi) circulent dans les deux sens...
vnourdin (2024-02-06 20:24:16+00:00): J'ai fait cette modification car mon gps (OsmAnd) me fait passer a droite avant de bifurquer a gauche, et sur le terrain c'est indiqué l'inverse donc je pensais utile de préciser cela.
gileri (2024-02-06 20:33:37+00:00): Tu parles du panneau visible là https://panoramax.fr/photos#focus=pic&map=21.67/45.7513157/4.8363634&pic=baa0a544-81c1-4f34-aaf4-094950a62513&speed=250&xyz=246.53/-0.72/30 ? En effet légalement en vélo on devrait le respecter car il manque le pannonceau "sauf cycles". Mais clairement il est là uniquement pour les véhicules lourds avec les feux bicolores et les plots pneumatiques.

Tout comme en vélo il n'est pas attendu qu'on respecte le feu rouge ici (personne a le badge), le panneau de sens unique également à mon avis.
gileri (2024-02-06 20:37:59+00:00): En tout cas ça devrait être oneway=yes d'après le panneau, pour que ça s'applique aux utilitaires et poids-lours passant là, et pas qu'au vélo. J'ai fait la modif : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147150767

Je pense quand même que ça serait plutôt oneway:bicycle=no
vnourdin (2024-02-06 20:44:33+00:00): En effet, je n'avais pas eu cette lecture, ça me semble pertinent !
osmviborg (2024-02-06 15:01:12+00:00): Please use "SDFI aerial imagery" when editing in Denmark.
blacx (2024-02-07 15:57:56+00:00): el millor per afegir qualsevol POI es simplement amb un node, has creat 3 edificis dins d'un altre i 4 sinagoges diferents. T'ho he arreglat per si ho vols mirar
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147135202
Hugoren Martinako (2024-03-07 08:48:47+00:00): Buenas,

Entiendo el propósito de la edición, pero dejas una relación incompleta y sin sentido "físico" (no tiene outers) https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17163269

Por otro lado, al tratarse de un objeto histórico y cambiante en el tiempo, el proyecto OpenHistoricalMap es más acorde (https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/search?query=castilla, fíjate cómo hay diferentes versiones de la frontera según el año).

Saludos
osmviborg (2024-02-06 15:04:05+00:00): Please use "SDFI aerial imagery" when editing in Denmark.
arjunaraoc (2024-03-05 10:02:28+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).

Check my improvement: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148242577
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147135349
BCNorwich (2024-02-08 07:42:40+00:00): Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Please don't place a highway on top of an existing highway. This duplication of highways disrupts routing. I've removed the duplicated highways in this changeset.

I don't think any changes were needed here. If a way does need amending/correcting the correction should be done to the existing way. This is OSM best practice that maintains a way history.

Regards Bernard.
arjunaraoc (2024-03-05 10:17:55+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).

Check my improvements. My final improvement is https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148243324
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147135616