piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
BCNorwich (2025-03-24 07:49:06+00:00): Way: Veer Teja Marg (1370669941) has been removed because it duplicates an existing highway and it disrupts routing.

You are repeatedly duplicating highway, please stop.
BCNorwich (2025-03-24 07:44:50+00:00): Way: Choudhary Colony Road (1370670522) has been removed because it duplicates an existing highway and it disrupts routing.
PubUpdater (2025-03-27 09:49:43+00:00): What is the intent behind the change to Elbow Lane here? It previously was a separate element for the brewery and the restaurant and it seems that now the restaurant and brewery are represented by the same node. Shouldn't different amenities be separate nodes?
ViriatoLusitano (2025-03-27 16:18:24+00:00): Hello PubUpdater. I am following what is on the ground and it's a pub that happens to have a restaurant. What's the purpose of having two different nodes representing the same establishment?
NeisReview (2025-03-24 07:33:38+00:00): Hallo Angelo, willkommen bei OSM.

Wenn Wege nicht mehr nutzbar sind, wird in der Regel versucht dies über entsprechende Tags abzubilden. Hierfür gibt es in OSM verschiedene Möglichkeiten, z.B. die Bäume als Barrieren oder den Weg als disused:* oder ähnliches zu markieren. Die Wege komplett zu entfernen ist dagegen meist keine gute Idee.

Viele Grüße
NeisReview (2025-03-24 07:35:13+00:00): Wenn ich es in dem Changeset davor richtig gesehen habe, war der Ansatz dort von dir die bessere Variante. Siehe https://osm.org/changeset/163997004
user_22664753 (2025-03-24 08:10:02+00:00): Hallo Neis,
wir hatten hier eine Abstimmung mit dem lokalen Forst und Jägerschaft. Die möchten in diesem Gebiet jegliche Benutzergruppen raus haben. Die haben deshalb nicht nur einfach mit Baumstämmen die alten Wege zugestellt, sondern auch die Pfade unkenntlich gemacht. Man kann deshalb die Pfade nicht mehr erkennen. Das soll auch bleiben, weshalb ich hier auch „radikal“ war. Das sind die letzten richtigen Wildruhezonen in diesem Wald und Teil des Mountainbike Konzept. 
Grüße 
Angelo
DIMB IG Rems-Murr
Joseph R P (2025-03-23 22:13:10+00:00): Hello, I have reverted this changeset in which you changed Route 29 to a motorway. This is incorrect, as the motorway tag is used for fully-controlled access highways. Whereas the Culpeper bypass is a controlled-access freeway, the rest of Route 29 which you retagged as a motorway has many at-grade intersections with other roads and driveways including traffic signals, and therefore should not be tagged as a motorway and should remain a trunk road.
anshanin (2025-05-09 19:03:41+00:00): This ATM node is inside a building under construction, it should probably be somewhere else https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12694749375
Smajser (2025-05-16 16:27:00+00:00): Hi,

I have checked today and moved ATM to correct position.
Also added MoneyGet ATM
TrickyFoxy (2025-03-31 14:46:53+00:00): 👋 gnome=yes https://osm.org/node/12694733380

What did you mean?
James Derrick (2025-03-31 15:25:40+00:00): Hi,
I wondered if the tag might get spotted by a linter!
Someone has attached a a 100mm high gnome to the gate post.
So, gnome=yes was added even though taginfo suggests this is a unique tag, the wiki didn't come up with anything else. 

artwork_type=statue seems a bit overblown, unless you have alternative ideas? :-)
Happy Mapping,

James
HirschKauz (2025-05-08 12:43:50+00:00): Hi James!  
Indeed, I stumbled upon the gnome with  [OSM latest keys].
btw - do we have a key for gatekeepers and keymasters? ;-)  
Cheers!
James Derrick (2025-05-08 14:30:51+00:00): Hi Hirsch,
Well, the closest I know for masters of key =value is the OSM wiki! :-)

Another suggestion could be amenity=checkpoint + surveillance:type=gnome  perhaps? :-)

I've mapped lots of strange things since 2007, but this little bit of someone else's humour is proving to be challenging.
Happy Mapping,

James
LuxuryCoop (2025-03-26 02:53:40+00:00): 건물을 그리실 때 단축키 Q를 이용하면 건물을 직사각형 모양으로 만들 수 있어 지도가 더 깔끔해집니다!
Glassman (2025-03-25 00:21:01+00:00): According to county records this is not a named road. See https://kitcogis.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=8bcc146d9c2847acb2e9aa239187c25e

I went ahead and changed it. I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163998080
BTosch (2025-03-25 02:36:44+00:00): It's on google maps and apple maps and has 4 legal addresses along it. If you look at the individual plats in the county GIS you will see the listed address is along the named 'Flying M Dr'. https://taxsifter.co.kittitas.wa.us/Search/results.aspx?q=963940
Glassman (2025-03-25 02:59:33+00:00): You are correct, the counties parcels show Flying M Drive as the streetname. That isn't unusual, they just assume a driveway access, often accompanied by a shared private service road. 

I'm very familiar with this concept. I've added thousands of addresses in Washington State. 

Now if the street is signed, then that is a whole different story. I have found errors in county addresses. One set in King County took me 3 years before the county fixed it.
kmpoppe_repair (2025-03-23 18:16:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 164000156 where the changeset comment is: name:de Änderungen rückgängig gemacht, die die alten und nicht mehr gültigen deutschen Namen enthielten
_sar (2025-03-29 02:15:30+00:00): Thanks for your contribution!

This is a good first attempt at an edit, although there are some tricks you might find helpful in the future.

1. When moving building outlines, be aware that the aerial images are not always vertically aligned - there is often a shear effect that causes the roof outline to be offset from the ground floor outline.

If you look at way 859466008, you can see that the outline now overlaps with the boundary fence, which is unlikely to be true. Using ground-level objects like this is an easy way to tell if something is wrong.

2. When drawing regular shapes like cricket pitches, you can use iD (and other editors) to orthogonalise and align them with each other.

3. You've placed the address node 6189412618 in the exact centre of the building. In general, address nodes are only separated from the building itself when indicating the exact location of the letterbox or main entrance, which is usually on the perimeter. Otherwise the address tags can simply be applied to the building object.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask.
Bienson (2025-03-24 00:37:03+00:00): Hallo,

Ich habe deinen Edit zurückgesetzt in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164010081 - du hast hier Geschäfte verschoben.
wombatmaper (2025-04-24 13:53:25+00:00): Hello, why did you set this restaurant to diet:vegetarian=no and diet:vegan=yes. It seems to be vegan only right? then it should have "only" in both fields.
SaxHunt (2025-05-05 12:56:28+00:00): Zugang Riegelhof existiert nicht, beachte on the ground!
Hier wurde offensichtlich nicht richtig kartiert, denn die Topo vor Ort ließe eine solche Wegführung überhaupt nicht zu.
Die bisherige Zuwegung wurde vom Waldeigentümer wegen erheblicher Erosionsschäden versperrt. Entsprechende Hinweise sind eindeutig sichtbar und sollten respektiert werden. Bitte löscht diesen Track wieder!
Filip009 (2025-10-21 11:09:54+00:00): Zdravím, prečo sú z tejto strany po 4? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12694872990 Nemalo by to reprezentovať jednu štruktúru?

Hello, why there are 4 of these? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12694872990 Shouldn't there be just one to represent the structure not lights?
Ropino (2025-10-27 09:40:50+00:00): Please see the following:
https://openairportmap.org/LZIB#map=17.25/48.155071/17.235822
I prefer more details (if possible) than just the structure.
For more precision, we could add light:count=1.
Filip009 (2025-10-27 13:12:39+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:aeroway=navigational In my opinion wiki is saying just about one node for structure. We do not map for renderer. So discuss somewhere, if it would not be better to use some tagging to get the same result. Like there can be light:colors="red|white|white|red" in combination with direction it needs less nodes and make map cleaner. If you start this topic in forums, please share a link here.
Ropino (2025-10-27 15:43:00+00:00): see:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:navigationaid%3Dals
'Set a node node where the light is' (and not: where the line of lights or the structure is)
in comparing to
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:navigationaid%3Dpapi
'Set a node node in the middle of the 4 lights'
--> I used for 'papi' one node per 'papi' (not 4)

I can't found "one node for structure" in wiki. For me is a single node to less for a lot of lights as marker for a long "line of lights" over few meters (e.g. als or rwt) and not mapping for the renderer.
Filip009 (2025-10-27 15:49:51+00:00): How about ref=* tag then? There should more than one tagged with same ref? https://backend.freemap.sk/gallery/pictures/693516/image?width=1484
And it looks like, there are 5 lights, not 4.
Ropino (2025-10-27 17:05:55+00:00): For me looks like 4*ALS (with the same space between)
plus: the 3th light from left: looks like a "Lead-in Light system (LDIN)"
plus: the (small) light in the middle: I don't know, what this is.

ref - good question: I know from other airports different ref/numbers per (single) light.
Here it could be also a ref for the lattice mast, not for the (different) lights.
eggie (2025-03-23 22:52:49+00:00): Dag Jos.. Maak altijd een verbinding met kruisende wegen/
warnings:crossing_ways:highway-highway
  	1
Ik heb dat nu voor je gedaan en het pad ook losgemaakt van de landuse.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-03-23 23:05:03+00:00): Een verouderde tag kan ik niet ontdekken.. Wel de foutmelding in je eigen changeset:
crossing ways.
User5848 (2025-03-24 15:50:24+00:00): Openstreetmap'de 164.000.000'ncu değişikliği siz yaptınız! Tebrikler. Türkiye'den Azerbaycan'a kucak dolusu sevgiler!
kmpoppe_repair (2025-03-23 18:16:23+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 163999058, 163999173.
NeisReview (2025-03-24 07:26:31+00:00): #UnexplainedChanges

Hello, welcome to OSM.

Could you please clarify the purpose behind your map changes? It's not entirely clear from the edited data and your added description. Also, what was used as a source of your activity?

Looking forward to your response. 
Thank you.
Kovoschiz (2025-03-24 08:10:39+00:00): Dragged point. This is a mistake.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-08 00:29:08+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164656559
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-31 15:52:45+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12694859957/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop?
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-07 22:53:53+00:00): Hello!

Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5158378 ?

I tried to repair it, maybe adding also material=metal makes sense

(and thanks for your mapping!)
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-07 22:54:22+00:00): streetlevel imagery - are you using Google Street View?
Jrachi (2025-04-10 06:40:24+00:00): Ciao.
In questa modifica hai cancellato la relazione di un percorso REI.
Però nel commento hai scritto "Inserimento percorso".
Si è trattato di una cancellazione involontaria, da ripristinare?
O Non hai scritto nel commento la motivazione reale?

Ivo
Cristini Patrick (2025-04-10 17:09:14+00:00): Buonasera Ivo, no semplicemente ne ho fatto 2 exnovo sul territorio cancellando la precedente. Modifica svolta per conto della sezione CAI di Cassino. 
Le nuove relazioni mancano volutamente del codice REI in quanto il numero assegnato è in contrasto con il settore. Seguirà approfondimento con la CRSC Lazio. Saluti
Jrachi (2025-04-10 17:17:52+00:00): Ciao.
Grazie della spiegazione.
Nel futuro considera di porre maggiore attenzione al commento che inserisci nel changeset.
Eleva la tua affidabilità di mappatore, ed evita perdite di tempo.

Ivo
Seven of Nini (2025-04-21 18:27:23+00:00): Hey, curious if you have more info about the construction of these two buildings, particularly Laugavegur 111. I changed both to building:proposed since they are not actively under construction yet (ref: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dconstruction)
Kerploonk (2025-04-21 18:56:01+00:00): Hi. They will be moving an existing historical building, Norðurpóll, to Hlemmtorg as part of the 5th phase of construction. The other building, Laugavegur 111, will house a playground "Hlemmur Leikhöll". Unsure whether it's an actual building, but it has an address.

A part of Hlemmtorg after construction of the 5th phase can be seen here:
https://reykjavik.is/sites/default/files/2025-03/hlemmtorg_1.jpg
Seven of Nini (2025-04-21 19:46:20+00:00): Awesome, thanks so much!
infeeeee (2025-03-23 18:46:43+00:00): Visszavonva

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164001217
Frans S (2025-03-27 13:24:51+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping. 
In general, well done.
1 point. You mapped an irregular shaped object as a building.
This is a walled courtyard (for keeping stock I presume)
I removed it.
Best regards and keep mapping
ellol (2025-03-27 15:14:16+00:00): Hi Frans. Thanks for the feedback - I appreciate it :-)
Best regards Peter
ghaefele (2025-09-21 13:26:08+00:00): Mit dem Ridge vom Ragazer Blanken in NW-Richtung übertreibst Du jetzt aber völlig. Das ist doch eine Verschneidung. Bitte hör endlich mit diesem Ridge-Wahnsinn im Bregenzerwald auf.
bkil (2025-03-23 21:09:59+00:00): A szerkesztésben a következő problémát fedeztem fel, kérjük erre figyelni a jövőben: https://wiki.osm.org/Hungary/Fontos_szempontok#Life_cycle_prefix
Carto'Cité (2025-03-31 17:44:27+00:00): Bonjour EUMapper,
Tu as rendu ces deux portions de route droite alors que leurs tracés suivaient bien le centre de la route :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/289229132
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/301559569
Je voulais savoir, avant éventuellement de corriger, si c'était volontaire car selon moi ce serait une régression de la précision.
À ta disposition pour en discuter.
Charles de Carto’Cité
EUMapper (2025-04-02 04:53:59+00:00): Bonjour,
je viens de corriger, en effet, la route n'est pas droite, désolé.
george1201 (2025-03-23 23:26:07+00:00): Was ist falsch an "Albtal-Verkehrs-Gesellschaft mbH"? AVG ist nur ein Kürzel, dieses ist unter operator:short bereits eingetragen.
Entbert (2025-03-24 11:36:37+00:00): Verstehe ich auch nicht. Bei DB, VBK, KVVH, ... haben wir als operator auch den vollen Namen.
george1201 (2025-03-26 14:40:04+00:00): Hallo @MappSurfer.
Du hast den vollständigen Namen des Operators in den Key operator:long_name verschoben. Diesen Schlüssel kenne ich nicht, ich kann ihn im Wiki auch nicht finden. Ist er neu, wurde die Einführung dieses neuen Schlüssels irgendwo beschlossen? Wenn ja, von wem? Auch im Forum kann ich nichts dazu finden. Kannst du bitte meine Bedenken kommentieren.
MappSurfer (2025-03-26 17:39:52+00:00): Hallo Georg

Den Key "operator:long_name" habe ich verwendet, da es, soweit ich weiss, keinen anderen Schlüssel gibt, der für diesen Fall passen würde. Meiner Meinung nach ist dieser das logische Gegenstück zuvon "short_name".
Falls du oder jemand anderes einen Schlüssel kennt, den es bereits gibt und der hier von der Logik her auch passt, bin ich gerne bereit, "operator:long_name" in diesen anderen Schlüssel zu wechseln.

Und was das Ändern des operator-Attributes angeht, da möchte ich einerseits auf die folgende Wiki-Seite verweisen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:OpenRailwayMap/Tagging. Dort steht in den Abschnitten "Betreiberwechsel" und "Grenzpunkt (Staatsgrenze)", dass die Betreiber sich an den Kürzeln orientierten, die in der Liste der europäischen Halterkürzel definiert sind.
Und andererseits kenne ich das aus meiner Heimatregion nur so, dass der Betreiber mit dessen Kürzel (SBB, BLS, etc.) angegeben wird. 

Ich hoffe, ich konnte deine Fragen einigermassen beantworten.

Liebe Grüsse
MappSurfer
Entbert (2025-03-26 20:45:53+00:00): Hallo MappSurfer, in den zitierten Abschnitten geht es ja gerade um die Abkürzungen ("Bei den Betreiberkürzeln [...]") für Keys wie railway:ref:DB=. Hier geht es aber um die Werte von operator, was etwas ganz anderes ist. In der Schweiz scheint die Praxis eine andere zu sein, aber in Deutschland wird hier der volle Name (in der Regel mit Rechtsform) verwendet. operator=DB findet sich quasi nirgendwo: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/217J Üblich sind die Langformen DB Netz [AG] bzw. aktueller DB InfraGO [AG]. Ich wäre darum klar dafür, auch für die AVG wieder denn vollen Namen zu verwenden.
george1201 (2025-03-26 22:16:31+00:00): Ich habe zu dem Thema im Forum unter https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/massenanderung-des-operator-namens/ eine Diskussion eröffnet.
woodpeck (2025-03-27 11:05:25+00:00): "meiner Meinung nach" ist keine ausreichende Begründung für einen Massen-Edit. Ich revertiere das jetzt erstmal; wenn die Community das im Forum gutheisst, kann man es ja wiederherstellen.
Amany_Ahmed (2025-04-03 11:36:01+00:00): Hello sAm6831Tta,
Thank you for your contribution to OpenStreetMap
I recently came across your updates in the following changesets:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164001491
I noticed that some roads, such as M55(way/152178227), were reclassified from Trunk to Primary. According to the Yemen OSM wiki page
(wiki OSM Yemen), roads like M100, M45, and M55 are currently categorized as Trunk roads.
I understand that mapping guidelines can evolve over time, and it’s possible that there are newer references or insights guiding these changes. If you have any updated sources, I would truly appreciate it if you could share them.
I appreciate your contributions
Best regards,
Amany_Ahmed
silversurfer83 (2025-03-23 20:34:07+00:00): Moin :)

wenn du weißt, dass es ein Tor gibt und wo sich dieses befindet, dann setz doch auf diese Stelle des Weges einen Punkt und mach da das Tor hin.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:barrier%3Dgate
cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164001644
NeisBot (2025-03-23 19:15:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was flagged because your added description contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment
NeisReview (2025-03-28 20:11:13+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/164224936
NeisReview (2025-03-28 20:11:32+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/164224959
IvanBabić (2025-03-24 14:41:25+00:00): I revert it because a relation was tagged #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164036433
Azamat89121 (2025-03-23 20:20:50+00:00): Toʻgʻri tartib
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2025-04-30 01:27:20+00:00): Please attach speed cameras to the road.

Or create a maxspeed enforcement relation.

See:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dspeed_camera
Danysan95 (2025-04-30 13:18:57+00:00): Added the relations in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165623273
marczoutendijk (2025-09-04 15:41:14+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/171687869#map=15/44.56715/11.89635
man_made=120
What is that supposed to indicate?

Best regards  
Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
Cybermanx (2025-09-05 09:07:45+00:00): Hi, i honestly dont know what that tag is supposed to mean. It's not something i modified at the time (It was a maproulette challenge about highway surface on italian main roads) and I don't recall any josm validator warning on that. 
I quickly looked at the way history (https://.osm.org/way/171687869/history, and I saw that it was added in 2019 (https://osm.org/changeset/73697206). By quickly studying that changeset, i believe the mapper meant to put maxspeed=120 on the bridge railway (https://osm.org/way/181456239), coherently with nearby railway tracks (osm.org/way/181456242 and osm.org/way/425965746), and mistakenly selected the underneath highway, also using a wrong tag, probably caused by some kind of autocomplete feature. 
That's the only reasonable explaination i can think of, because 120 kph is not a default highway speed limit in IT (we have 50, 90, 110 and 130).
If it's something that's fine with you, i can proceed to do this kind of edit to the area.

Best regards
Cybermanx
marczoutendijk (2025-09-05 14:11:21+00:00): Yes, please, go ahead!

Marc.
Cybermanx (2025-09-05 14:48:05+00:00): https://osm.org/changeset/171503243
marczoutendijk (2025-09-05 18:34:04+00:00): Thanks!
IvanBabić (2025-03-24 20:55:36+00:00): I revert it because a relation was tagged #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164051461
pavvv (2025-03-23 20:29:03+00:00): Czego nie rozumiesz w sformułowaniu: „Głosy nie są oddawane na konkretne wymagania oznaczenia drogi jako highway=trunk, tylko na ogólny sposób wyznaczania kryteriów. Głosowanie dotyczące dokładnych wytycznych odbędzie się w późniejszym terminie po uzgodnieniu ze społecznością według wyników poniższego głosowania.”? Jeszcze nie ustaliliśmy, które drogi powinny być podwyższone.
theDM (2025-03-23 22:30:42+00:00): Głosowanie nie wyłoniło jednoznacznie zwycięzcy.
Kryterium Jakość ma 8 głosów za i 4 przeciw, ale Kryterium Mieszane ma 2 głosy za i 0 przeciw, tak więc do finalnej wersji trunka jeszcze trochę brakuje.
O ile w przypadku Estakady Kwiatkowskiego nie ma kontrowersji, o tyle tagowanie obwodnicy Kościerzyny i fragmentu DK 90 nie jest do końca jednoznaczne.
stasiu512 (2025-03-23 23:03:42+00:00): Będąc szczerym to skrzyżowanie al. AK z Łostowicką i Havla wygląda conajmniej dziwnie po zmianie tych kategorii.
silversurfer83 (2025-03-24 20:16:06+00:00): Hey greggerm :)

I just stumbled across your recent edit here in RI and think that maybe you would like to revisit some of the building outlines you added.

happy mapping
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164003911
Michi (2025-04-30 23:22:29+00:00): Hi,

sicher dass der Weg https://osm.org/way/1370709019 ein Feldweg bzw. für Landwirtschaft ist und nicht einfach bloß ein Fußweg?
ChromeLotus (2025-04-14 21:58:32+00:00): Hello DigitalSeb01,

I noticed changes were made to the ref network in Uganda. I have been unable to find many resources for the ref network. I am wondering if you have any resources you were using when making the ref changes you would be able to share. I am also curious if these ref changes have already gone in to affect, or if they are future, planned changes.

-ChromeLotus
Jhoan Seb (2025-04-14 23:10:54+00:00): Hi, ChromeLotus. I recommend consulting the Aaroads Wiki (https://wiki.aaroads.com/wiki/Category:Uganda) for more information. We recently had discussions to include alphanumeric codes to the Ugandan routes (https://wiki.aaroads.com/w/index.php?title=AARoads:The_Interchange&oldid=568002#Uganda_Road_Numbering)
Sources:
* https://openjicareport.jica.go.jp/pdf/12013058_01.pdf (Page A1-21)
* https://repository.kulib.kyoto-u.ac.jp/dspace/bitstream/2433/283688/5/dkogk05075.pdf (Page 57)
These codes appear on the signs from 2022 (This can be confirmed by user photos showing that this road is coded A5 to the DR Congo border):
- https://x.com/PJafali/status/1502172731499941896
- https://x.com/RasBSsali/status/1826732565958721914
-- DigitalSeb01
ChromeLotus (2025-04-17 15:24:42+00:00): Hi DigitalSeb01,

Thank you for the reply and for these detailed resources. I noticed that an M20 ref was added in Kampala from here (https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/0.350603/32.652987) to here (https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/0.350603/32.652987). I didn’t see any associated wiki pages, like the A route pages you linked, for this route. Would you be able to share any documentation for this route as well?

-ChromeLotus