piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Ltrlg (2025-12-01 16:57:43+00:00): Super, merci !

En effet, les bornes sont quasi identiques. Il faudra que je me penche sur les différences de tags pour voir si il ne serait pas pertinent d’en harmoniser certains dans un sens ou l’autre. Mais je me concentre pour l’instant sur l’ajout des bornes manquantes…
jbcharron (2025-12-01 17:21:29+00:00): C'est vrai qu'une page sur le wiki avec les tags a utiliser serait utiles
A l'origine, je me suis basé sur cette exemple https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102829319
NorthCrab_upload (2024-05-09 16:10:19+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11891761573

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Lumikeiju (2024-05-09 19:11:44+00:00): Hi!

Please consider separating future changesets into smaller geographic regions, as this makes it easier for future editors to understand and review these changes. For example, after making changes in Mexico, submit those additions before moving on to make edits in Canada.

Additionally, please refer to the wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/) if you are unsure of how to tag something, rather than using "tourism=attraction" as a generic tag for points of interest. For example, Node: Victoria Bike Rentals (11891775974) should be tagged with "amenity=bicycle_rental"

Happy mapping!
MxxCon (2024-05-10 02:46:51+00:00): I question the accuracy of 37 random POIs all over Europe and NA. This is probably needs to be reverted.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151108208
BPM805 (2024-05-10 16:48:33+00:00): You have a suspicious mind Mxxcon...
Verify all my entries and you'll find them accurate..
This program is to add to the OSM correct?
MxxCon (2024-05-21 04:28:22+00:00): Well, looking at 11891776069 
"name=La Gran'mere du Chimquiere" and "name:en=Menhir Statue 1800BC" are wrong. One is not the English translation of the other.
Looking at 11891775669, what is it?
Node 11891775974, this is NOT how you tag bike rental place.
Node 11891775672, this is NOT how you tag a port.
Plus all the other problems...

And what is the source of all this data?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151108208
mikimapbuilder (2024-05-13 06:24:28+00:00): Building was modified to allign with imagery
user_8655426 (2024-05-10 09:51:22+00:00): こんにちは。
OpenStreetMap は現在、実際に存在する地物をマッピングするプロジェクトです。(real and current) 架空の地物を追加したり、既存のデータを実際とは異なるものに変更したりしないでください。よろしくお願いします。(事実と異なる不正な編集を行ったユーザーは、ブロックされる可能性があります。)

・「ようこそ！」
https://www.openstreetmap.org/welcome

・JA:破壊行為
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:破壊行為

・Beware of fake beaches (Pokémon Go) (偽のビーチに注意してください。ポケモン GO)
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/beware-of-fake-beaches-pokemon-go/112413

---

・JA:Tag:natural=beach (砂浜)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Tag:natural%3Dbeach

・JA:Tag:natural=sand (砂地)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Tag:natural%3Dsand

・JA:Key:playground (公園などの砂場)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Key:playground#Sand_play_devices

・JA:Tag:natural=tree_row (並木)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Tag:natural%3Dtree_row

・JA:Map Features (地物)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Map_Features
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151108370
user_8655426 (2024-05-10 09:53:35+00:00): それから、変更セットのコメントが意味不明です。
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/ミイポン/history

OSMの編集は多くのユーザーが参加する共同作業なので、このコメントはとても重要です。他のユーザーに編集の内容や意図が伝わるよう、なるべく詳しく書いてください。最低でも「なにをどうした」のかを書いてください。(例：砂浜を追加。)
よろしくお願いします。

・JA:変更セット
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:変更セット

・JA:変更セットの良いコメント
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:変更セットの良いコメント

・JA:グッドプラクティス
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:グッドプラクティス
user_8655426 (2024-05-10 11:21:46+00:00): Reverted.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151140671
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-07-27 22:06:13+00:00): Please consider communicating with the other person instead of engaging in edit wars.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-07-27 22:08:34+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Disputes
nlehuby (2024-12-17 14:20:17+00:00): Bonjour,

vous avez transformé le musée du chocolat en magasin vacant. Est-ce vraiment le cas ?
Le musée semble toujours exister 🤔
Christophe Raverdy (2024-12-17 19:17:08+00:00): Bonjour Je suis embêté car cela fait partie d'un groupe de modifications anciennes et je ne me souviens plus du contexte exact.  GSW (https://maps.app.goo.gl/rsrdReiNuz8N5bR76), la publicité légale (https://www.pappers.fr/entreprise/le-musee-gourmand-du-chocolat-choco-story-sarl-515180271) et le site internet (https://www.museeduchocolat.fr) sont cohérents quand au fait que le commerce est en activité. Je vois pour supprimer ma modification / rétablir. Je vous remercie pour votre vigilance
Christophe Raverdy (2024-12-17 19:50:58+00:00): Sur le coup la modification a été empêchée (liaisons wikidata). J'ai réaffecté le Musée depuis Street Complete et confirmé d'adresse depuis OSM
nlehuby (2024-12-21 09:34:26+00:00): merci d'avoir corrigé !
miluethi (2024-05-14 21:50:04+00:00): Anthony,
Please square out building shapes in OSM by pressing the "Q" key. Thank you.
Dimitar155 (2024-05-09 16:21:38+00:00): https://www.sofiatraffic.bg/bg/transport/routeChanges/2642
NeisBot (2024-05-10 08:33:51+00:00): Hi rems92, welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature's:
https://osm.org/node/11891789217
https://osm.org/way/1281221091

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-11 14:37:09+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151189458
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-10 15:53:01+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151136490
pavvv (2024-05-09 19:22:58+00:00): Wrocławskie krasnale nie są firmą, a jeśli są, to dlaczego są podane w tagu network? Dlaczego tagi brand:* odnoszą się do tego, co jest podane w tagu network?
Podana strona jest oficjalną stroną wrocławskich krasnali.
Jakie źródło? Nie brałem żadnych danych ze strony krasnali, jedynie linkowałem stronę.
maro21 (2024-05-17 21:47:53+00:00): Edycja była automatyczna i niezgodna z https://osm.wiki/Pl:Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct, dlatego ją wycofałem. Proszę zapoznaj się z tymi zasadami.

Zmiana tagów na inne i dodanie network:website na 620 obiektach nie jest poprawieniem oczywistej literówki.
pavvv (2024-05-19 16:33:53+00:00): Nie była to automatyczna zmiana, jeśli sprawdziłem, że każdy obiekt ma te same tagi network, brand:wikidata i brand:wikipedi. (Jeden z nich nawet miał brand=Wrocławskie krasnale, co jest oczywistym błędem)

Tagi brand:wikidata i brand:wikipedia odwołujące się do Wrocławskich krasnali jest nieprawidłowe, ponieważ Wrocławskie krasnale to nie jest firma. Jest to jeszcze bardziej oczywiste patrząc na to, że już występuje tag network=Wrocławskie krasnale.
maro21 (2024-05-19 21:28:06+00:00): Ja tu w ogóle nie poruszyłem wątku poprawności tagu obecnego czy poprzedniego, tylko mechanicznej edycji zrobionej niezgodnie z zasadami. Proszę cię, abyś zastosował się do https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct
pavvv (2024-05-20 05:16:11+00:00): Przed edycją sprawdziłem edytowane obiekty.

Zakres mojej zmiany to jedynie zmiana kluczy brand:wikidata na network:wikidata oraz brand:wikipedia na network:wikipedia, czyli prosta poprawa błędnego prefixu.
jayhawker6 (2024-05-09 16:48:17+00:00): Usually best to edit with
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused
unless there is something new there already.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151109527
Adam Elman (2024-05-09 16:59:57+00:00): Thank you! Will fix.
miluethi (2024-07-28 04:10:02+00:00): Hi Anthony,

Please match with the building shapes exactly the aerial imagery and square these shape.

Your building shapes are much too big and not squared.

Thank  you.
pavvv (2024-05-09 19:25:08+00:00): Na jakiej podstawie ta zmiana? Proszę podać źródło.
W mojej zmianie dałem nazwy pochodzące z oficjalnego źródła: https://www.wroclaw.pl/komunikacja/wszystkie-przystanki
pavvv (2024-05-16 06:09:45+00:00): Nie chcesz gadać, co? Więc muszę się domyślać. Zakładam, że piszesz zgodnie z zasadami pisowni polskiej https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Znakowanie_dr%C3%B3g_w_Polsce#Nazewnictwo_ulic . W takim razie myślisz, że lepiej będzie dać te nazwy do official_name?
maro21 (2024-05-17 21:40:17+00:00): Wielki Słownik Ortograficzny PWN z zasadami pisowni i interpunkcji, 2016
oraz https://sjp.pwn.pl/poradnia/haslo/Nazwa-przystanku;20154.html

Czemu uważasz, że wroclaw.pl jest oficjalnym źródłem? To portal informacyjny.

W tym "oficjalnym" źródle niektóre przystanki są pisane, nie wiadomo czemu, wielkimi literami, a przecież na OSM nie mamy "TRESTNO" ani "TARCZYŃSKI ARENA (Królewiecka)". Nie sugerowałbym się tą listą. Wiele lat po zmianie nazwy przystanku "Hotel Wrocław" na "Zaolziańska" na tej liście nadal była nazwa "Hotel Wrocław". Minęło parę lat od mojego zgłoszenia zanim to poprawili.

Są tam inne błędy takie jak "Brzezia Łąka - skrzy. Główna" - gdzie oprócz dywizu jest jeszcze niepoprawny skrót kończący się samogłoską.
Zatem tę listę przystanków można sobie używać do planowania trasy, a nie jako źródło nazw w OSM.

Odnośnie do drugiej wiadomości: nie czytam codziennie dyskusji w zestawach zmian, nawet jeśli coś codziennie edytuję. W pilnych sprawach można napisać prywatną wiadomość na OSM.

Nie, nie uważam że to dobry pomysł, żeby nazwy niepoprawne ortograficznie i interpunkcyjnie wpisywać do alt_name czy innych _name.
pavvv (2024-05-24 18:23:14+00:00): Na wroclaw.pl masz oficjalny rozkład MPK.
Te nazwy przystanków i kierunków również można znaleźć na Otwartych Danych https://opendata.cui.wroclaw.pl/dataset/rozkladjazdytransportupublicznegoxml_data i to one trafiają na rozkłady na przystankach w terenie.

MPK lubi pisać nazwy pętli dużymi literami i tak początkowo było to dodawane do OSM. Rzeczywiście już tego nie ma, a można byłoby dodać również jako official_name.
maro21 (2024-08-26 21:19:46+00:00): Tak, to co jest na otwartych danych, wroclaw.pl, mpk.wroc.pl, jakdojade.pl i wielu innych miejscach to ta sama baza danych, więc nazwy przystanków są tam pisane tak samo.

Lepiej byłoby napisać do Wydziału Transportu, żeby poprawili literówki, niż dodawać pisownię z błędami na OSM.

> "MPK lubi pisać nazwy pętli dużymi literami i tak początkowo było to dodawane do OSM."

MPK jest przewoźnikiem i nie zajmuje się ani trochę przystankami ani ich nazwami.
waldyrious (2024-05-26 19:11:54+00:00): Olá, ciampi. Podes por favor explicar as alterações que fizeste neste changeset? Não percebi bem qual foi o objetivo. Parece que vários elementos foram apagados e recriados, perdendo-se bastantes tags e relações no processo.

Se precisares, eu e outros da comunidade de editores em Portugal temos todo o gosto em apoiar-te sobre este tipo de alterações. Diz coisas :)

p.s. - ajuda também que uses sumários de edição mais descritivos. Dizer apenas "Alterações em Braga" não explica realmente o que foi mudado e porquê 😅
gscholz (2024-05-14 07:39:32+00:00): Hi Olayinka Omoboyede,
this changeset has create a huge amount of errors in the OSM database:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=3.38060&lat=6.70203&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=151110575

I have just reverted it to fix those issues.
Guido
Swihail (2024-07-18 08:44:47+00:00): Hello collinsomwando,
I have fixed validation error between building & building intersecting for way 1055629412, way 1055018815,way 1055629410,way 1055629409,way 1055629408,way 1055629413,way 1055629407 and
way 1055018814
Please inspect your task carefully before closing.
Happy Mapping!
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-31 06:09:36+00:00): Partly reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/151403010
HirschKauz (2024-05-09 18:17:52+00:00): Hi (ich schon wieder - lol)  
Sag mal, ist das 24/7 oder nur an bestimmten Tagen und zu bestimmten Tageszeiten?  
Hier gibts viel Lesestoff: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxstay  
Grüße :-)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151112040
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-31 06:10:12+00:00): Partly reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/151403273
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-11 09:41:59+00:00): Thank you for mapping. The mapping looks great and also the changeset comment. Happy Mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151112112
LockOnGuy (2024-05-13 12:00:13+00:00): Hello Johnny, thank you for your edits.   
I would like to mention something, in our Iraqi community group in Telegram https://t.me/OSM_Iraq , a user mentioned that the roads that you added that are above the park are not existing on the ground and the plan might be changed.     
The user also shared this imaged which I reuploaded for you to see: https://i.ibb.co/30V7KQF/image.png    
Just wanted to let you know that maybe youre editing it with an old sketch?      
Unfortunately I haven't been there to verify it on the ground to edit accordingly. Keep in mind the status of the roads before your edit was edited by the Egyptian team "digital Egypt" and they do have access to recent sat images.     
Regards.
eggie (2024-05-09 17:59:46+00:00): Dag Q..
Je hebt niet iets verwijderd?
Volgens mij kun je de tags dan beter verwijderen van de nodes.
Mvg
eggie
QGerhard (2024-05-09 19:19:58+00:00): Oke, weer wat geleerd. Bedankt
MxxCon (2024-05-10 02:50:45+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:colour explicitly mentions that building:facade:colour= as incorrect.
I'll fix this.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151112755
IraGersh (2024-05-10 03:12:39+00:00): ok.  I was tempted to just remove it.
NeisBot (2024-05-10 08:37:28+00:00): Hi hatkiddo, welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/node/11891956411

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-11 14:37:48+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151189491
nickvet419 (2024-09-23 23:29:58+00:00): west of Orchard, North Ave has no physical separation between ways.
Zol87 (2024-11-05 02:11:44+00:00): Sorry, I thought North Ave should be split since it's a major road.
nickvet419 (2024-11-05 10:26:34+00:00): only if is seporated by some sort of barrier.  here is some further reading. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Dual_carriageway
miluethi (2024-05-11 13:06:07+00:00): Hi Ashish,

Please square out building shapes by pressing the "Q" key. 

Thank you for contributing to OSM Nicaragua.
miluethi (2024-05-11 13:22:50+00:00): Hi Cyrman,

Please square out all your building shapes by pressing the "Q" key. I also noticed you added frames without tagging them, i.e. "building=yes". Please always use validated OSM tag.

Thank you for contributing to OSM Nicaragua.
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-11 14:39:20+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151189557
NeisBot (2024-05-10 08:37:29+00:00): Hi amirabdallah22, welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/888272422

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-11 14:38:23+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151189514
skylerzap (2024-05-09 18:52:59+00:00): my sincere apologies if i'm messing something up by submitting so many changes.
Szymson (2024-05-09 18:55:57+00:00): Musisz wybrać albo water albo wetland bo to się wyklucza i nie renderuje
Violaine_Do (2024-11-29 19:51:05+00:00): Hi, Imagery should be moved prior to changing building location. I corrected that.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151115179
miluethi (2024-05-11 13:29:25+00:00): Hi Elle,

Please square out buildings by pressing the "Q" key.

I noticed also that a few shapes are significantly bigger than shown on the satellite imagery.

Thank you for contributing to OSM Nicaragua.
miluethi (2024-05-15 13:49:33+00:00): Hi Bmcent1,
Please square out all buildings in OSM by pressing the "Q" key with a selected building shape.
Thank you for contributing to OSM Nicaragua.
miluethi (2024-05-11 13:08:20+00:00): Hi Cortado,

Please square out buildings by pressing the "Q" key.

Thank you for contributing to OSM Nicaragua.
nikelmn (2024-05-09 19:35:25+00:00): В районной автогруппе регулярно публикуют фото эвакуации с данного участка.
TrickyFoxy (2024-05-09 19:41:06+00:00): любопытно. Но лучше не удалять, а убрать теги парковки, чтобы потом снова не нарисовали
adiatmad (2024-07-18 04:58:52+00:00): Hey AnudeepMedishetti, hope you are doing well. I'm wondering about the decision to use both building=* and layer=*. Could you explain your approach? I'm not sure if this is consistent with what's recommended on the OSM Wiki. Appreciate it!

> (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer)
> (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1281257051) 
> (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1281254902)
Adze1 (2024-05-11 09:48:48+00:00): Thanks.
Is there anywhere I can learn how to fix things myself?
gurglypipe (2024-05-11 10:06:39+00:00): No worries. What in particular do you want to learn? Message me (https://www.openstreetmap.org/message/new/gurglypipe) and I’ll be happy to provide pointers
elsy1 (2024-05-11 11:20:27+00:00): درود، لطفا در ویرایش ورسم های خود دقت فرمایید اکثر رسم های ساختمان ها که اضافه و ویرایش کردید اشکال دارد. تشکر
muralito (2024-05-10 00:08:17+00:00): Hola. Esta bien corregirlo si hace falta, pero la razon no deberia ser esa.

Podria ser que el software del GPS no tenga en cuenta que tiene 5 carriles y por eso te "ve" afuera?

El mapeo tiene que ser por el centro de la calzada, no ladearlo. Por las imagenes de Bing, si es que estan actualizadas  estaria mal o la que editaste o la otra entrante.
AgusQui (2024-08-12 03:02:59+00:00): Agregado a lo que dice muralito, hay que tener en cuenta todos las trazas gpx y el ancho del camino, no una sola. Tu corrección no tuvo en cuenta los demás elementos mapeados en la zona por lo que la bicisenda quedó mapeada del lado incorrecto de la colectora (ya lo corregí). Por favor al mover elementos tener en cuenta todo lo demás también.
VictorIE (2024-05-11 08:23:03+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1281268672

This is already mapped as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/194295083
VictorIE (2024-05-11 08:27:08+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1281268672

The castle is already mapped here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/194295083
Ropino (2025-07-03 12:44:29+00:00): Hallo,
woher stammt die Bezeichnung "Abzweig Cottbus" an der B168/B169 ?
Ich konnte die Bezeichnung auf den Bilder (u.a. Mapillary) nicht finden.
meisoof (2024-05-09 20:14:56+00:00): *meant to say lane
ivanbranco (2024-07-21 08:24:54+00:00): Ciao Kacamino,

grazie per la modifica! Se questi alberi sono Sakura si potrebbe anche aggiungere il tag species="Prunus serrulata"

buon mapping!
mikimapbuilder (2024-05-13 06:29:40+00:00): Building is oversized
Kerploonk (2024-05-09 23:06:45+00:00): I recently merged both segments in line with deiliskipulag (local plan) from 2023, see:
http://skipulagsaaetlanir.skipulagsstofnun.is/skipulagvefur/DisplayDoc.aspx?itemid=Y_SWt5_Fq0mJvh7YYukbEA
and
http://skipulagsaaetlanir.skipulagsstofnun.is/skipulagvefur/DisplayDoc.aspx?itemid=ny8ZhRy4AUC1OGuiBLA_Q
Kerploonk (2024-05-09 23:10:26+00:00): The name of this road is also Kambavegur on older plans, see deiliskipulag from 2007 below. While it is called Turnahvarf on the street sign, I decided to change the name in line with construction of a residential neighbourhood SE of Turnahvarf.
Deiliskipulag 2007: http://skipulagsaaetlanir.skipulagsstofnun.is/skipulagvefur/DisplayDoc.aspx?itemid=02634425796859637500
CurlingMan13 (2024-05-10 00:05:37+00:00): Do not try to simulate holes by wrapping an area back upon itself.  Multipolygon relations should be used.

Please acknowledge changeset comments and try to avoid repeating errors that have been identified in your changesets.  It looks like you were previously blocked twice for similar things...

https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=10385907
csimeona22 (2024-05-10 16:58:54+00:00): Correction: Source used was Esri World Imagery.
felipeeugenio (2024-05-09 23:20:43+00:00): revertido
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-11 09:40:08+00:00): Thank you for mapping. The mapping looks great and also the changeset comment. But would you mind checking the buildings, they are glued together.  Happy Mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151119864
James Pain (2024-05-11 11:47:57+00:00): Hello! Thanks for reviewing this changeset. This is the first comment I've had to a changeset. Very happy to get advice and feedback.

I think, by 'glued together' you mean that the terrace houses share nodes. I've spot checked them, and they all seem good. I created these using the terrace tool in JOSM, so it was largely automated and I haven't thoroughly checked them all.

Have I understood what you mean by glued together? Could you point me to where one of the mistakes are?

Thank you!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151119864
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-11 14:09:29+00:00): Hi there, thanks for your comment. I overlooked some of the buildings and thought they were glued. Thanks to you for the insight. Everything looks good. Sorry for the oversight again.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151119864
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-11 14:14:00+00:00): And also just in case if required, please square the buildings. It does help in Data Quality. Thank you again.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151119864
James Pain (2024-05-11 14:46:05+00:00): Hello! Thank you for the follow up. I appreciate it!

I believe all buildings are square unless they're distinctively a different shape in real life. If you find any that are unintentionally a different shape, let me know which.
Also, regarding data quality, I'd love to learn more. Is there any documentation for best practices for data quality purposes?

Thanks again!