piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SherbetS (2026-07-09 14:55:31+00:00): Hello,
When adding communication mast infrastructure, please use the "mast" preset in JOSM, not "communications tower".
Object: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13051296400
See:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dcommunications_tower

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dmast

Thanks,
James
Katz K (2026-07-09 20:49:22+00:00): Hi James,
Thanks! I never really looked deeper into these differences. Will do.
Supaplex (2025-08-07 15:09:02+00:00): Hi,

你的變動跨越兩地，之後編輯是否能注意，比較方便能檢視編輯狀況
Koalaman (2025-08-08 15:15:20+00:00): Hi,
Thanks for the reminder, my mistake.
I’ll keep future edits localised.
𒂼𒄄　 (2026-01-17 02:39:34+00:00): لماذا قمت بحذف الاسم العربي من هذه الطرق؟    

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/301203965/history

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/952077184/history

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1065150609/history

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1065150610/history
ڕاستی (2026-03-13 05:40:38+00:00): بێزەحمەت بە کوردی قسان بکە، تێناگەم چ دەریێ.
eggie (2025-08-06 06:28:31+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback   De adresinfo staat al op de ligplaats. Ik heb je info verplaatst.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-08-06 06:37:30+00:00): Merged info with addressnode
eggie (2025-08-06 06:36:53+00:00): Merged info
eggie (2025-08-06 06:41:03+00:00): Reverted own changeset

Please check the address
Bartholomeus Ruloffsstraat, Oud Zuid, 1071 WJ Amsterdam, Netherlands according website? 
This is a school.
Gr eggie
eggie (2025-08-06 06:35:00+00:00): Merged info with addressnode
eggie (2025-08-06 06:33:14+00:00): Merged info with addressnode
eggie (2025-08-06 06:32:21+00:00): Merged info with mooring
eggie (2025-08-06 06:31:31+00:00): Merged info with addressnode
eggie (2025-08-06 06:31:05+00:00): Merged info with addressnode
eggie (2025-08-06 06:30:32+00:00): Hi Thomas.. Please use the present addressnode. Do'nt add addresses in OSM.
Gr eggie
map per (2025-08-08 13:58:12+00:00): Hello YueL080101,

this road (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/190402402) inside a military area is not a 'secondary' road. I therefore changed the category back to 'service'.

Best regards
map per
Rainero (2025-08-10 11:36:26+00:00): Hello YueL080101,
first of all welcome at Openstreetmap and thank you for contributing and updating the data.

However I have reverted some changes in this changeset:

1. the connections between the connection ways between the carriageways, e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24781861 are not highway=path. With your change you have blocked themotor vehicles' use of these ways. Please read in the  wiki about highway=path: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dpath

2. you moved (probably accidentally) the entrance of a building about 300 m to another building, see your change in achavi: https://ibb.co/r29SztWS

Partial Revert of CS170034716 in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170239022

Viele Grüße,
Rainer
citrula (2025-08-06 22:40:53+00:00): welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contribution. I was able to align the road better using updated imagery which should also be available in your editor as well. Try enabling the "NOAA NGS Gulf Coast Imagery (2025)" layer, and confirm that this looks right to you.
NieWnen (2025-08-06 20:53:22+00:00): Czy tutaj zrobili strefę 30? Jeśli tak, to przydałoby się dorzucić `source:maxspeed=PL:zone30`
Michał Paluchowski (2025-08-07 04:09:07+00:00): Tak, jest wyznaczona strefa. Dodałem tag.
NieWnen (2025-08-07 19:36:30+00:00): Dzięki!
AndreaDp271 (2025-08-06 08:28:30+00:00): ciao, qui sarebbe stato meglio fare 2 changesets
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170036084
AndreaDp271 (2025-08-06 08:29:34+00:00): Ciao, qui avresti dovuto fare più changeset, i punti sono molto lontani fra di loro
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170036142
022 (2025-08-06 04:48:31+00:00): use this query below. which will display all of the admin_level=6 municipalities which have been imported thus far. Please let me know if you have any feedback or questions. Thanks.



[out:json][timeout:25];
// gather results
relation["admin_level"="6"]["name:fr"]["name:en"]({{bbox}});
// print results
out geom;
jmapb (2025-08-10 06:43:40+00:00): Hello PedestrianMapping_HopMapper, I've partially reverted this changeset with changeset 170227725. The geometry changes you've made here caused sidewalks to cross a building and through a private parking area. I tried to leave the correct changes intact.

I understand this is part of an organized editing project by Meta. I've reviewed https://tasks.openstreetmap.us/projects/869 https://maproulette.org/challenge/51162/task/294635175 and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities/Meta/Pedestrian_Mapping but can't quite make out what's going on here. I'd love to know:
 - Why are these challenges being created in particular spots (what's a "complex intersection"?)
 - What observations will trigger a change, and what are the recommended changes?
 - What are the procedures for task validation?

Thanks, jmapb
PedestrianMapping_HopMapper (2025-08-11 05:15:35+00:00): Hello jmapb, Thank you for your review and for partially reverting the changeset while preserving the accurate edits, I really appreciate your attention to detail. I tried to realign the data as per Bing imagery, but some portion of sidewalk overlapped with building data; here i could have corrected. Thanks for the changes

To answer your questions 
- The goal is to improve pedestrian infrastructure representation, especially in areas with high foot traffic. 
- Changes are usually triggered when we observe issues such as missing crosswalks & sidewalks, disconnected crossings, misaligned paths etc. The recommended changes depend on the situation but typically involve adding or correcting sidewalks, crosswalks, and pedestrian paths to ensure logical and accessible pedestrian navigation.
- Each task is reviewed by separate contributors; experienced with OSM editing guidelines. Validators check for geometry accuracy, tagging consistency, and real-world alignment (via imagery or street-level sources where available). If any issues are found, changes are corrected or modified with comments.

We’ll take extra care to avoid routing paths through private or building areas in future tasks.

Thanks, PedestrianMapping_HopMapper
queenofthenightosphere (2025-08-06 05:24:41+00:00): The addition of that space doesn't seem to follow the opening hours spec: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours/specification
user_5359 (2025-08-06 08:37:15+00:00): The space is clearly visible in the grammar section, as it is very obvious in the examples.
queenofthenightosphere (2025-08-06 23:29:54+00:00): Sure, but if you look at `<small_range_selectors>` under §"Syntax Diagram", it states `[<weekday_selector>][<time_selector>]`  without any `<space>`. There's inconsistency between the examples and the spec.
user_5359 (2025-08-07 03:47:39+00:00): The following answer applies to both cases: We are both human beings who have opinions and can make mistakes. However, change requests are not the appropriate platform for fundamental discussions that affect more than just two people. You are welcome to explain your understanding in the forum or, more specifically, in the discussion pages of the wiki pages. However, I recommend validation using the tools provided.
Yog Sot (2025-08-06 22:25:28+00:00): poproszę ostatni raz, nie wcinaj mi się jak nigdy cię tam nie było.  
A parkingi w pasie drogowym nie mogą byc prywatne...
Aim311_ (2025-08-07 07:03:46+00:00): Proszę nie wcinaj sie jeśli nie wiesz jak wygląda miejsce do zwracania.

A grożenie mi proszę, zostaw dla siebie.
Yog Sot (2025-08-07 09:19:39+00:00): ustawiłeś prywatny parking w obszarze drogi publicznej... no to moze jednak dobrze, że cie poprawiam? 
Robisz błędy. Jak robisz je u mnie nie pierwszy raz, to poprawiam, bo często brak równiez u ciebie refleksji. 
Jak robisz je gdzie indziej, to moge tlyko liczyc, że ktos inny to skontroluje.
Aim311_ (2025-08-07 14:58:49+00:00): W/g mnie dla niemiejscowych kierowców wjeżdżających w te drogi, którzy nie jada do swojego garażu, czy innego miejsca spoczynku pod domem na prywatnej posesji to są ślepe uliczki i nawigacja nie powinna "zachęcać kierowców" do wjeżdżania w te uliczki sugerując, że na końcu drogi jest normalna zawijka.
Glassman (2025-08-06 17:55:37+00:00): You added a building within a building. While OSM does have the ability to map indoor features it is only used by a few very advanced mappers. I would suggest just adding a node to the feature. 

Can you please remove the building tag on the half baked and lil fruity restaurant?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170037236
tastrax (2025-08-06 08:42:57+00:00): Esri imagery is often more recent than BING but poorly aligned. I have made some adjustments to add the boundary and creekline (from LIST Data). I have also deleted some names that we would not normally have on things such as "Home" etc. I also updated the URL's for your website and added the phone number from the website.
eggie (2025-08-06 06:45:31+00:00): Dag Ernst .. Hier heb je schade veroorzaakt aan de hoogspanningsleiding. Ik heb de schade hersteld.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=170037651

MVG
eggie
ErnstvV (2025-08-06 08:05:48+00:00): Dank je, ik heb dat niet gemerkt, sorry.
eggie (2025-08-06 08:58:21+00:00): No problem... Dit kan komen door schuiven met de kaart in editmodus.
Gr eggie
Robert46798 (2025-08-07 21:13:30+00:00): Hallo HuSchuASL,

willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Vielen Dank für deine Aktualisierung!

Ich habe mir deinen Änderungssatz angeschaut, weil du die entsprechende Option beim hochladen angegeben hast.

Du hast die Daten des Steuerbüros am Gebäude eingetragen. Passender ist es in der Regel, dafür einen extra Punkt zu erstellen und auf diesem die Eigenschaften einzutragen. Das siehst du entsprechend auch bei den POIs in der Umgebung.

Eine Ausnahme wird häufig gemacht, wenn ein Geschäft oder ähnliches tatsächlich das gesamte Gebäude einnimmt. Das kann ich aus der Ferne nicht beurteilen, ist aber hier bestimmt nicht der Fall.

Viele Grüße,
Robert
HuSchuASL (2025-08-08 04:47:30+00:00): Hallo Robert,
vielen Dank für deine Rückmeldung. In diesem Fall befindet sich das Steuerbüro in dem kompletten Gebäude.
Viele Grüße 
Daniel
Fizzie-DWG (2025-10-23 06:21:07+00:00): DWG revert, apparent sockpuppet, poor quality mapping, unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173657043
wa_wheatbelt (2026-05-17 16:31:22+00:00): Hi there. Can you please share your source for mapping way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1420325114 and the rest of this car park’s roads as dual carriageways? It doesn’t appear to match available aerial imagery, or my memory of the location. Apologies if I’m wrong.
wa_wheatbelt (2026-05-17 16:32:45+00:00): Meant to say way #1420325115.
SPLATPLAYS (2026-05-18 07:30:07+00:00): I mapped both directions as they are marked out on the road, they are both one way segments of a single road.
trial (2025-08-08 11:44:45+00:00): Bonjour, tu as refait la modélisation de la partie N165 -  Gestel de la D 306. Bien, mais tu as laissé des infos sur les nombres de voie etc. qui du coup n'ont plus de sens, voir https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170087839
Yunan973 (2025-10-24 15:07:23+00:00): Bonjour,
peux tu confirmer que le coiffeur Barber house existe toujours ? Il semble avoir fermé fin aout, cf. https://annuaire-entreprises.data.gouv.fr/etablissement/93925216900023, donc après ton dernier contrôle sur place.
shorelessriver25 (2025-10-26 15:06:52+00:00): Oui, je viens de passer devant, ça existe toujours. C'est dimanche donc c'est fermé mais c'est clairement actif.
StC (2025-08-07 11:33:37+00:00): Bonjour,

je ne suis pas sûr de comprendre l'intention avec ce chanegset (quelle erreur ? quelle modification ?) mais il a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire qui passe par là. Je m'occupe de la réparation.
JulesGabrielVerne (2025-09-08 07:42:12+00:00): Czy Ty mapujesz stan rzeczywisty czy to co ma być w przyszłości? Ulica Spacerowa rzeczywiście odchodzi od ul. Osiedle Makowe?
cyganka (2025-09-08 09:01:24+00:00): Sprawdzone: ul. Spacerowa rzeczywiście ma ustalony przebieg od DW 120 aż do ul. Osiedle Makowe, chociaż na niektórych odcinkach wygląda jak droga polna, podobnie jak inne ulice w Bielkowie np. Fiołkowa, Sadowa czy Rolna.
JulesGabrielVerne (2025-09-08 09:38:22+00:00): ustalony czyli to pieśń przyszłość. Proszę nie mapuj obiektów które w rzeczywistości nie istnieją, bo będę zmuszony robić ci całościowe reverty. Szanujmy mapę!
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-09-28 08:40:52+00:00):  Na czym dokładnie polega problem? Że highway=residential na https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1420327169 to błąd?
JulesGabrielVerne (2025-09-28 09:36:57+00:00): nie, że między ul.Spacerową a ul. Osiedle Makowe nie ma w rzeczywistości połączenia przez środek pól.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-09-29 04:52:52+00:00): czyli to poprawione już jest?
pwbriggs (2025-08-07 22:45:22+00:00): Looks good to me! Thanks for the contribution and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
foreigner037 (2025-08-28 17:44:29+00:00): Привет, 

сигурен ли си, че липсва физическа преграда? На пътя доста ясно се виждат колчета, които разделят платната. 
https://maps.app.goo.gl/3eZDPRpQrFRBmMWu5
Dimitar155 (2025-08-28 18:45:21+00:00): Здравей,

Гумените колчета не са кой знае каква преграда. Ако бяха, пътя през кресненското дефиле също трябваше да е разделен.
foreigner037 (2025-08-28 19:41:23+00:00): Ами, не съвсем. Тук колчетата са доста по-нагъсто (примерно през 3 метра вместо през 15) и имат основи. Дори и да спре напълно, кола няма как да мине от другата страна, докато на Кресна няма проблем да се мине, дори без да се спира напълно. Къде е границата какво е физическа преграда?
Dimitar155 (2025-08-28 20:19:52+00:00): Колчетата са безобидни. Основата е парче пластмаса, закрепена с 2-3 дюбела, а стълбчето е гумено. Ако го бутнеш с ръка, се накланя и после се изправя само.

Тяхната цел е основно да насочват колите да не излизат от лентата си, поради което се наричат "делинеатори" или "пътни ограничители". Спокойно може да се мине директно през тях без сериозни щети за автомобила.

Физическа преграда е нещо, което реално би затруднило преминаването на кола, като бордюр, мантинела, джърси бариера, бетонни блокове и подобни.
foreigner037 (2025-08-29 06:15:57+00:00): Островите по кръстовищата също са ниски бордюри и през тях спокойно може да мине кола, но там ги разделяме. Аз мисля, че ако няма преграда, то минаването в другата лента трябва да е без щети, не без сериозни щети.
Dimitar155 (2025-08-29 06:47:25+00:00): Физическа преграда е елемент, който прави преминаването на автомобил невъзможно без риск от повреди. Колчето е гъвкаво и се гази без щети (освен евентуална драскотина по боята). Бордюрът обаче нанася сериозни щети - затова първото не е, а второто е физическа преграда. Дори нисък бордюр може да спука гума.
foreigner037 (2025-08-29 10:26:20+00:00): Не съм съгласен изобщо.
foreigner037 (2025-08-29 10:28:18+00:00): А и сам каза, че можеш да си ожулиш колата, което противоречи на твърдението ти за щетите.
foreigner037 (2025-08-29 10:33:51+00:00): За да не става объркване, по принцип съм съгласен с аргументите ти. На Кресна например няма смисъл от разделяне, а и на повечето други места, където сложиха колчета. Тук конкретно обаче мисля, че ситуацията не е същата.
Dimitar155 (2025-08-29 11:19:11+00:00): За мен драскотина или леки вдлъбнатини, като от градушка или от отваряне на врата на съседна кола, не се броят за сериозна щета. Истинска щета е например счупено стъкло от градушка или спукан картер от уж нисък бордюр.

Гумените колчета могат да бъдат преминати без проблем от всяка лека кола, линейка или пожарна, ако се кара разумно (примерно под 20 км/ч). При висока скорост е възможно (но не задължително) да се появи малко ожулване, но това не ги прави физическа преграда.
foreigner037 (2025-08-29 11:25:20+00:00): Амии, пак не съм убеден, но явно няма да постигнем съгласие.
dadavid (2025-08-06 09:14:31+00:00): Hallo Zuchauer, willkommen bei OSM :) 

ich habe ein Paar Punkte an Feedback zu dieser Bearbeitung: 

Die Bank ist eine Bank und kein Park, schaue dazu auch ins Wiki [1]. 

Namen sind generell keine Beschreibungen, sonder nur echte Eigennamen, der Name Bushaltestelle sollte also wieder entfernt werden. Auch die Bank hat eigentlich keinen Namen, das was du dort eingetragen hast ist ja eher eine Beschreibung (description=*) oder, wenn es auf der Bank selbst steht, eine Innschrift (inscription=*) [3]. 

Das ist anfangs sicherlich alles ziemlich kompliziert, melde dich also bei Fragen gern und schau im Zweifelsfall einfach ins Wiki :) 

Viele Grüße und weiterhin viel Spass bei OSM 

David

Das Wartehäuschen der Bushaltestelle solltest du nicht einfach als normales Gebäude sondern als Buswartehäuschen, also amenity=shelter und shelter_type=public_transport, eintragen [2]. 

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dbench

[2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dbus_stop

[3] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen#Namen_sind_keine_Beschreibungen
eggie (2025-08-06 07:17:05+00:00): Welcome to OSM..

Thx for your contribution. 
I merged your info with the present addressnode.

Gr eggie
eggie (2025-08-06 07:22:31+00:00): Dag CX  .. Probeer als het kan op de bestaande adresnode bij te taggen. Dus niet op de gebouwomtrek.

Ik heb wat aangepast.
MVG
eggie
CX1 (2025-08-06 07:26:03+00:00): Het spijt me. Bedankt eggie.
literan (2025-08-06 08:56:33+00:00): вот бы кто-нибудь еще landuse=residential убрал с Щелковского шоссе в Щитникове)
solenoid jam (2025-08-07 13:52:14+00:00): Бам!
literan (2025-08-07 17:01:17+00:00): 🔥
d3mol3k (2025-08-06 19:31:49+00:00): Dziękuję
kadiwa (2025-08-06 15:57:35+00:00): Sind die Wege für Fußgänger und Radfahrer zugänglich oder nicht?
Reinhard HH (2025-08-06 18:50:34+00:00): Die sind überhaupt nicht zugänglich. Es ist eine ca. 2 Meter hohe Vollabsperrung vom dichten Gestrüpp links des Weges zum dichten Gestrüpp rechts des Weges, professionell erstellt, d.h. lückenlos.  ich bin mit Verboten und Absperrungen im Allgemeinen nicht pingelig und setz mich gerne mal drüber hinweg, aber da kommt man beim besten Willen nicht dran vorbei.
kadiwa (2025-08-06 19:05:08+00:00): Ok, danke. Du hattest die "foot=yes", "foot=permissive" und "bicycle=yes" Angaben bestehen lassen. Das hatte mich verwirrt. Ich hab es jetzt so gemacht, dass nur noch access=no dransteht.
Reinhard HH (2025-08-06 19:35:22+00:00): Ok danke, da hab ich wohl nicht richtig hingeschaut. Viele Grüße, Reinhard
map per (2025-08-08 11:53:07+00:00): Hallo Emma Js,

bist du dir sicher, dass es das Gebäude https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1420333988 noch gibt? Laut https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162963873 wurde das schon abgerissen.

Danke und viele Grüße
map per
Emma Js (2025-08-13 14:33:41+00:00): Hallo map per,
Danke für die Nachricht. Du hast Recht, es sieht aus, als wäre das Gebäude abgerissen worden. Ich werde es reparieren.
Danke und viele Grüße
rempshaener (2025-08-06 08:47:22+00:00): Hallo,

hier passt was nicht. Es ist ein node innerhalb eines Gebäude-way. Dann passt aber building=public nicht; das müsste schon an einen way.

Viele Grüße
eggie (2025-08-06 08:39:23+00:00): Welkom bij OSM,
Bedankt voor je bijdrage.
Wellicht shop=tattoo..
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dtattoo
Ik zal het aanpassen.
MVG
eggie
theDM (2025-08-06 23:29:55+00:00): Te drogi proposed przy wiadukcie Elżbietańska są aktualne czy tylko to construction jest docelowe?
Marek-M (2025-08-07 03:24:23+00:00): Prawdopodobnie jest to docelowy układ drogowy, więc są one aktualne. Autor tych proposed posiłkował się dokumentacją projektową.
theDM (2025-08-07 07:25:19+00:00): Nie powinny być construction, skoro prace się rozpoczęły?
Marek-M (2025-08-07 08:08:56+00:00): Jak na razie jeszcze jest demontowany stary most. Jeżdżę tędy prawie codziennie, więc spróbuję aktualizować postępy prac na bieżąco.
Anas masuris (2025-08-07 22:18:27+00:00): Tak, dodawałem jako proposed, gdyż niezbyt byłem zorientowany nad stanem budowy dróg - kolej jest zryta całkowicie, więc to jest od razu jako w budowie.
Marek-M (2025-08-08 05:49:28+00:00): Wczoraj tam jechałem i sprawdziłem, że stary wiadukt jest już zaorany. Przerzuciłem na status construction w tym CS: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170136584
eggie (2025-08-06 08:40:26+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
abouter (2025-08-06 09:06:48+00:00): Bedankt Eggie!
Ik heb ook gelijk de naamgeving en openingstijden van bevriende ondernemers aangepast.
Waar komen die gegevens eigenlijk vandaan, want ze zijn jaren oud.
eggie (2025-08-06 09:28:58+00:00): Dag abouter,

Dat zal meestal door vrijwilligers zijn gedaan. Hier was de laatste mutatie nov 2023.
Er zijn uiteraard ook ondernemers zelf die het aanpassen. OSM wordt steeds bekender. 
Sommige grote winkelketens hebben iemand in dienst die het bijhoudt zoals bv Kruidvat e.d. 
OSM bestaat 20 jaar. 
Het ligt er maar net aan of er een actieve mapper in de buurt is die ook interesse heeft voor openingstijden. 

MVG
eggie
abouter (2025-08-06 09:35:49+00:00): ik ga mijn best doen voor Holten :)
groeten!
eggie (2025-08-06 09:42:27+00:00): 👍
Glassman (2025-08-06 17:57:49+00:00): #TIP: square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170042456
dcapillae (2025-08-06 14:39:11+00:00): Hola, Néstor.

He eliminado la relación porque no es necesaria. La cochera está definida por una vía cerrada: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/544006962. Todo lo que está dentro de esa vía se entiende que pertenece a la cochera.

En cuanto al nombre, ¿la cochera tiene nombre? En OpenStreetMap solo ponemos nombre a objetos que realmente lo tienen. El nombre tiene además que ser verificable, es decir, que otra persona puede comprobar y coincidirá en que ese objeto efectivamente tiene ese nombre: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Verifiability.

Si la cochera no tiene un nombre propio (por ejemplo, en un cartel a la entrada), no pasa nada. El elemento que define a la cochera está bien definido en el mapa y la instalación está claramente identificada como de la EMT mediante la etiqueta «operator»: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/544006962.

En el wiki hay una página dedicada a Málaga: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:M%C3%A1laga y una específica para el mapeado de líneas de la EMT: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Rutas_de_bus_en_M%C3%A1laga.

Gracias por los cambios.

Atentamente,

Daniel Capilla
dzamper (2025-08-06 08:30:04+00:00): a dlaczego?
user_21331599 (2025-08-06 08:34:57+00:00): Bo to nie są tereny kolejowe. Poza tym zrobiono to nielogicznie, w kawałkach i niepotrzebnie. Innych odcinków torowisk tramwajowych nikt nie oznacza "terenami kolejowymi".
dzamper (2025-08-06 08:48:32+00:00): To że ktoś postanowił tymi słowami („teren kolejowy”) nazwać szablon opisujący ten tag (landuse=railway) w konkretnym języku (polskim) w konkretnym edytorze (iD) to jeszcze nie jest powód żeby usuwać całkowicie geometrię (w ostateczności zawsze można ją zostawić i dać inne tagi). Skoro tory tramwajowe oznacza się kluczem railway (railway=tram) to użycie landuse=railway do terenu tramwajowego pasuje jak najbardziej i wbrew temu co piszesz są przykłady takiego stosowania tego tagu w innych miejscach i w Polsce, i w Europie, i na Świecie.
user_21331599 (2025-08-06 08:58:06+00:00): Tam w ogóle nie ma potrzeby podkładać obszaru pod ten tor tramwajowy z opisem "teren kolejowy". To takie zagospodarowanie na siłę "terenu kolejowego" który bardziej zarezerwowany jest dla kolei w jej powszechnym rozumieniu. Torowiska tramwajowe są na terenach miejskich dzierżawionych od tych miast, trzeba by znaleźć na to inny tag. Chyba że pl. Sikorskiego też oznaczymy jako "teren kolejowy";)