piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Gregory Peony (2025-09-10 17:17:08+00:00): Hi, you correctly identified, tagged and squared building footprints. Most are quite accurate but the imagery allows for some to be more so.

When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom in so that you can see the outline of the building and mark the corners carefully. Exclude shadows and yards when tracing the footprint. Keep in mind that you are looking at the [roofs of buildings](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape#Roof_shape), but mapping their footprints. Depending on how the scene is lit, pitched roofs may have light and dark sections that belong to one building. Generally pitched roofs overhang the walls of a building, so a footprint slightly smaller than the roof is accurate. You can scale selected features in ID with shift+(-/+), or JOSM with ctrl.+alt+Lclick & drag.  Take care to make contributions that others can build upon.

Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
AndyB_66 (2025-09-10 16:52:32+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
Gregory Peony (2025-09-10 16:51:48+00:00): You added valid and accurate footpritns here. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171743028
AndyB_66 (2025-09-10 17:52:32+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
Hugoren Martinako (2025-09-10 16:51:21+00:00): Please, do you mind to stop fixing the borders? I'm working as well with lower level boundaries in Asturias, and we're overwritting each other. I will fix them all afterwards.
In case you detect something wrong left behind, please wait a couple of days to fix it, to avoid any activity over the area.

Danke schön
Grüss
bartgron (2025-09-10 20:54:00+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
rempshaener (2025-09-10 17:42:09+00:00): Hallo,

du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Zu den Parkplätzen mit amenity=parking_space: Dieses Tagging dient der Ergänzung von amenity=parking, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity=parking%20space?uselang=de. Alleinstehend ist dieses Tagging nicht konsistent.

Zu den Gräben: Sicher, dass es sich um waterway=drain handelt, d. h. die Gräben mit Beton ausgekleidet sind? Vorher standen die auf waterway=drain und intermittent=yes (=nicht dauerhaft Wasser führend)

Bei Fragen bitte melden.
Viele Grüße
AndyB_66 (2025-09-10 17:53:22+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Dobr%C3%A9_koment%C3%A1%C5%99e_sad_zm%C4%9Bn
AndyB_66 (2025-09-10 17:51:08+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
Gregory Peony (2025-09-10 16:18:40+00:00): Hi, you generally correctly identified buildings in the imagery and tagged them correctly, but they could be more accuate. I have some feedback for you so that you can improve your future contributions. 

The circular building you added actually envelopes a smaller square one.

When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom in so that you can see the outline of the building and mark the corners carefully. Exclude shadows and yards when tracing the footprint. Keep in mind that you are looking at the roofs of buildings, but mapping their footprints. Depending on how the scene is lit, pitched roofs may have light and dark sections that belong to one building. Generally pitched roofs overhang the walls of a building, so a footprint slightly smaller than the roof is accurate. You can scale selected features in ID with shift+(-/+), or JOSM with ctrl.+alt+Lclick & drag.  Take care to make contributions that others can build upon.

Please do not connect the corners of buildings to other buildings or features such as highways or residential areas. In the iD Editor, hold down the `Alt` key to prevent your cursor from snapping to existing data and accidentally creating shared(grey) nodes. This [video about connected nodes](https://youtu.be/ltn1VOiq5_0) has more information and a guide.

After tracing and tagging features which are likely square or round, please remember to square their corners (q), or circularise them (o), because it is almost impossible and time consuming to draw shapes so percisely by hand. Buildings with metal or pitched roofs tend to have square corners; round buildings are identifiable by the distinctive cresent shaped shadow they cast. Unless the building is clearly a different shape then it's best to assume that it should be rounded or its corners should be squared. In the iD Editor, you can right click for access to editing functions. Since roofs tend to overhang walls trace the initial shape slightly smaller to allow a buffer for any change in size that may occur. In JOSM use the [buildingstools plugin](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/BuildingsTools). In ID you must draw the shape accurately enough else shapes will not completely square. This [video about squaring features in ID](https://youtu.be/Xs5wX592E1o) has more information and a demo.

Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
AndyB_66 (2025-09-10 16:52:48+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
julsta (2025-09-10 16:36:22+00:00): dlaczego nie wyswietlaja mi sie pomaranczowe kwadraciki przy punktach, które dodałam, bo są mi one potrzebne do zadania na studia, aby zrobić screena.
Marek-M (2025-09-11 06:30:18+00:00): Obrazki mapy są przechowywane w pamięci przeglądarki w celu szybszego ładowania. Po edycji po ok. 5 minutach możesz odświeżyć te tzw. kafelki klawiszami `Ctrl+F5` (w niektórych przeglądarkach będzie to inny skrót).
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Pamięć_podręczna_przeglądarki

Czy dane, które wprowadzasz na mapę w celu zdania na studia, są danymi prawdziwymi?

Na OSM nie można wrzucać fikcyjnych danych.
eggie (2025-09-10 17:30:58+00:00): Hoi..
Geen motor_vehicle =no op paaltjes.
Bicycle=yes is default op paaltjes.

Zie wiki bollard.

Gr eggie
eggie (2025-09-10 17:57:14+00:00): ... en het paaltje verbinden met het pad.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Tag:barrier%3Dbollard
Moiety (2025-09-11 07:48:59+00:00): Hoe verbind ik het paaltje met het pad?
eggie (2025-09-11 07:54:11+00:00): Hier heb ik het zelf al gedaan. 

Je maakt een node op het pad en sleept het paaltje er heen. Volgens mij plakt iD alles vanzelf aan elkaar. Ik gebruik die editor eigenlijk niet,
In JOSm sleept ik het paaltje naar een zelfgemaakt node op het pad en druk op de M toets (merge)
Ik zal het paaltje weer losmaken. Dan kun je het zelf proberen.
eggie (2025-09-11 07:55:18+00:00): paaltje is weer los.
eggie (2025-09-11 07:56:12+00:00): basisbewerkingen iD
https://learnosm.org/nl_NL/beginner/id-editor/#basisbewerkingen-met-id
Mashin (2025-09-10 22:36:09+00:00): Hi,
how do you know that the trail is abandoned?
eggie (2025-09-10 17:52:37+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback Alle begin is moeilijk. Svp niet dubbel taggen. Ik haal één naam weer weg.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Gregory Peony (2025-09-10 16:45:11+00:00): Hi, you identified buildings here, but the imagery allows them to be more accurate. Zoom in and out to better interpret the imagery. 

When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom in so that you can see the outline of the building and mark the corners carefully. Exclude shadows and yards when tracing the footprint. Keep in mind that you are looking at the roofs of buildings, but mapping their footprints. Depending on how the scene is lit, pitched roofs may have light and dark sections that belong to one building. Generally pitched roofs overhang the walls of a building, so a footprint slightly smaller than the roof is accurate. You can scale selected features in ID with shift+(-/+), or JOSM with ctrl.+alt+Lclick & drag.  Take care to make contributions that others can build upon.

Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/

I hope this helps.
Supaplex030 (2025-10-23 06:42:46+00:00): Hallo, hier hast du einige linienhafte amenity=parking-Features angelegt, z.B. hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1428784341

Ist das ein versehen und du meintest etwas anderes, z.B. einen kerb oder ein gate?

lg, Alex
fmc_5 (2025-10-23 07:52:53+00:00): War ein Versehen, ich habe es korrigiert.
Gregory Peony (2025-09-10 17:06:55+00:00): You generally identified buildings in the imagery here but they imagery allows their footpritns to be mapped more accurately. Zoom in and out to aid your interpretation and consider the roof shape of the buildings you're mapping.

When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom in so that you can see the outline of the building and mark the corners carefully. Exclude shadows and yards when tracing the footprint. Keep in mind that you are looking at the [roofs of buildings](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape#Roof_shape), but mapping their footprints. Depending on how the scene is lit, pitched roofs may have light and dark sections that belong to one building. Generally pitched roofs overhang the walls of a building, so a footprint slightly smaller than the roof is accurate. You can scale selected features in ID with shift+(-/+), or JOSM with ctrl.+alt+Lclick & drag.  Take care to make contributions that others can build upon.

Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
Gregory Peony (2025-09-10 17:17:48+00:00): This footprit is in fact square. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171745050
NeatNit (2025-09-13 10:22:35+00:00): היי, נראה שבטעות הזזת תחנת אוטובוס ומיזגת אותה עם בית כנסת. אני אתקן את זה עכשיו, רק מציין כדי שתהיה יותר זהיר עם זה בעתיד. תודה!
NeatNit (2025-09-13 11:02:01+00:00): שוחזר: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171869725
silversurfer83 (2025-09-10 19:18:17+00:00): Top :)

gut, dass du da dran bist
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171746176
Elefant aus Wuppertal (2025-09-11 12:11:12+00:00): Danke dir für deinen Kommentar :)

Ja, mich haben vor allem die Aufzüge interessiert.

Brilon Wald liegt zugegeben ziemlich abgelegen, das muss man sich schon extra vornehmen, um da vorbeizukommen.
Aber der Vorteil war, es war nichts los und so konnte ich (einfacher) einige Aufnahmen etc. anfertigen.
AndyB_66 (2025-09-10 17:50:17+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
zabop (2025-09-10 21:55:00+00:00): Please add meaningful changeset comments. "ф" does not qualify.
custodiankeyy (2025-09-10 19:20:51+00:00): Lütfen bir önceki değişiklik setine yazmış olduğum yorumu okuyun. Ayrıca landuse=residental olan alanlar yerleşim yerini belirtiyor onları kaldırmayın.


https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171653343
AndyB_66 (2025-09-10 17:52:01+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
Gregory Peony (2025-09-10 17:33:42+00:00): Hi, you identified and mapped some buildings accurately here, however others inappropriately share nodes with others, have not been appropriately shaped or envelope multiple buildings visible in imagery. I flagged some footprints here I think could be better mapped. 

Check https://osmcha.org/changesets/171747971 for an example. 

Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171747128
Michael_H (2025-10-01 17:45:42+00:00): Hallo statmother, ich kenne die organicmaps-app nicht, aber der Hundeverein war bereits korrekt eingetragen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/41977117
Ich habe den doppelten Eintrag gelöscht.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-09 13:13:20+00:00): Hello!

You used
water=wastewaterw
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1428797542/history

Have you maybe meant
water=wastewater
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
eggie (2025-09-10 17:48:29+00:00): Hi   .. This is no trailerpark..  
You are familiar in this area?

Greetz,
eggie
nve-makes-maps (2025-09-10 18:06:55+00:00): I am.  it used to be a camp site,  it has more permanent structures now.  if you can think of an area designation that better matched the current situation,  i’m all ears.   

the previous designation categorized the entire area as a single building, which is surely not what was intended, so in aggregate, we are moving in the right direction.
eggie (2025-09-10 18:15:03+00:00): I removed the building =no
That gives no sens I agree.

It's a project of a former mapper.
Please contact that mapper. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Dillen%20GJ
It's still in progress. 
It's a chalet park.
A trailerpark is something different.
I case you are a native speaker (Dutch) it's possibel to discus in Dutch. 


Greetz and thanks for reply,
eggie
validator
eggie (2025-09-10 18:19:08+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dchalet
nve-makes-maps (2025-09-10 18:24:17+00:00): mag ook in het Nederlands hoor..

ik zag chalet park niet in de lijst staan.  

ik ben met een 3d model van deze omgeving bezig en zag een erg groot gebouw op deze locatie.  het was als “holiday cottage“ beschreven.
eggie (2025-09-10 18:30:17+00:00): Ah zo.....   Yep...  Waarom mappers soms building=no taggen is mij een raadsel.
Voorheen renderde dat ook als gebouw.

De 3D nu https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=51.9821467&lon=5.4522707&zoom=19

De tag chalet was eigenlijk bedoeld voor één gebouw, maar wordt nu (volgens de wiki)  ook gebruikt voor een groep chalets.
Maar het probleem zal wel in die building=no hebben gezeten.
nve-makes-maps (2025-09-10 18:30:40+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dchalet

“For lack of better alternative, this tag is also applied for a group of chalets under the same operator. An attempted replacement tourism=holiday_village is rarely used”

beetje jammer, die instructie.  holiday village klinkt als een beter alternatief,  dan beschrijf je in ieder geval geen plaats als gebouw
nve-makes-maps (2025-09-10 18:34:48+00:00): stukken beter zo, bedankt!

https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=51.9821467&lon=5.4522707&zoom=19

leuke link, hilarisch, die bouw kranen 😅

ik ben met map2model.com bezig.  die genereert modellen die zo de 3d printer in kunnen
eggie (2025-09-10 18:37:16+00:00): Oke....  maar dat tourism=chalet is geen beschrijving van een gebouw maar de functie...   De buildingtag heb ik verwijderd van het vlak. Dat was niet correct. 
Die functie levert geen gebouw op. 

Maar ik ben wel eens dat er een beter tag zou kunnen worden verzonnen.. en je bent niet de enige,,
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/please-add-tourism-holiday-village-to-the-wiki/112889
NorthCrab_upload (2025-09-10 18:32:23+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1428799871

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
bartgron (2025-09-10 21:13:12+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
dieterdreist (2025-09-25 12:07:39+00:00): Hi, I don’t think this is a sidewalk: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1428799996
at most it is a shoulder where you can walk on, what do you think?

Cheers
Martin
I-Izzo (2025-10-07 15:18:31+00:00): Hi, sorry for the late reply I have not been getting any notifications. On 2nd viewing I agree. I will get rid of it promptly.
dieterdreist (2025-10-07 15:31:49+00:00): thank you
Langlaeufer (2025-09-13 10:44:55+00:00): Ist hier wirklich nur Radfahren erlaubt? Hallo Mike, ist der Weg mit Rad/Fußwegschildern versehen? 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen_kartieren
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171747883
Langlaeufer (2025-09-13 10:45:05+00:00): Ist hier wirklich nur Radfahren erlaubt? Hallo Mike, ist der Weg mit Rad/Fußwegschildern versehen? 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen_kartieren
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171747883
MikeHameln (2025-09-13 19:30:19+00:00): Radfahren und Fußweg. Schilder sind noch nicht angebracht.
bartgron (2025-09-10 21:13:22+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
bartgron (2025-09-10 21:13:28+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
NeisBot (2025-09-10 17:47:01+00:00): Hi Ramazan Shazadaev, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Added houses with new geometry and attributes"
Gregory Peony (2025-09-10 17:46:08+00:00): Hi Farb, you identified buildings in the imagery and shaped them correctly but the imagery allows for some of them to be more accurate; generally they are oversized.

When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom in so that you can see the outline of the building and mark the corners carefully. Exclude shadows and yards when tracing the footprint. Keep in mind that you are looking at the [roofs of buildings](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape#Roof_shape), but mapping their footprints. Depending on how the scene is lit, pitched roofs may have light and dark sections that belong to one building. Generally pitched roofs overhang the walls of a building, so a footprint slightly smaller than the roof is accurate. You can scale selected features in ID with shift+(-/+), or JOSM with ctrl.+alt+Lclick & drag.  Take care to make contributions that others can build upon.

Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
Gregory Peony (2025-09-10 17:43:44+00:00): Hi Lena, you added a valid and accurate footprint here. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171748151
Gregory Peony (2025-09-10 17:59:22+00:00): These look like valid and accurate footprints to be. good job identifying the Southern one since it looks like a tree is obscuring its shadow. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171748155
Gregory Peony (2025-09-10 17:56:20+00:00): Valid footprints, though ever so slightly oversized. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171748247
Gregory Peony (2025-09-10 17:55:05+00:00): Hi Noort, you identified and mapped the buildings here quite well, though they could be slightly smaller and you enveloped two buildings with the footprint I flagged. Pay attention to shadows to better tell where one building ends and another begins. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171748254