piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
TinPetreković (2025-07-23 08:39:54+00:00): Adding restrictions to roads. Bing Maps Aerial imagery in ID editor shows that the roads do not actually exist. Therefore they have been temporarily tagged with "access=private" to limit their access instead of removing them until additional street imagery sources are available. #OptimoRoute
SomeoneElse (2025-08-03 14:34:38+00:00): Hello James, and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Andy from OSM's Data Working Group here.  This change has been flagged to us because it has a lot of deletions in it.
After looking at it, I'm worried that some of the changes here will have the opposite effect to the one that you desire.
An example, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1307126023/history was mapped before as sac_scale=demanding_mountain_hiking .  Just deleting it might mean that someone might add it back without those tags, meaning that it could show up in hiking apps designed for regular tourists, misleading them into attempting something that they should not.
If it genuinely doesn't exist as any sort of path (but might be visible on old out of copyright maps or imagery) other tags would be better - perhaps "disused:highway".  If it does exist but is beyond anything normally tagged in OSM as "path", then again some other tag (perhaps "scramble"?) might be better.
I'd also suggest discussing it with the wider community in the forum at https://community.openstreetmap.org/tags/c/communities/uk/86/scotland - you can login there with your regular OSM account.
Best Regards,
Andy
James McGurk - Glen Coe NNR Ranger (2025-08-04 10:43:41+00:00): Hi Andy and thanks for your comments.

I'll open a discussion on that forum.

When you mention that paths could show up in hiking apps designed for regular tourists, unfortunately that's already happening even with the "demanding alpine hiking" tags, which is why I made these edits - no matter what the tags or difficulty or information provided, everything marked as being accessible by foot seems to be showing up looking like a regular footpath on apps, including some challenging scrambles and some bits of steep open hillside with no trampled line visible. That's why I made these changes - I heard back from one app saying that they didn't believe it was their responsibility to fix it themselves, and I've met a lot of lost people out of their comfort zone searching for paths where there aren't any as a result. I do think this should be more of an issue with how the apps use the Open Street Map rather than with the map itself, so I'm just trying to find the best solution to the problems.

Cheers,

James.
SomeoneElse (2025-08-04 17:51:04+00:00): Hello,

> everything marked as being accessible by foot seems to be showing up looking like a regular footpath on apps

On which apps are you seeing problematical data displayed?

It'd be great to have more details so that we can investigate.

> I heard back from one app saying that they didn't believe it was their responsibility to fix it themselves

.. especially details of that app!  At the very least they need to educate their helpdesk.

Best Regards,
Andy
James McGurk - Glen Coe NNR Ranger (2025-08-05 08:30:17+00:00): Hi Andy,

Probably a good discussion to have by email, mine beingjmcgurk@nts.org.ukand I'll copy in a colleague too.
And I'd better clarify, the comment that they said they didn't think it was their responsibility is very much me paraphrasing and possibly putting in stronger terms a sense I got from the response, rather than something explicitly said.
SomeoneElse (2025-08-14 11:53:55+00:00): Hi Jim,
Any more thoughts?  You have an email from the DWG (sent 06/08/2025 11:18) - just reply to that and it'll go on the ticket.
We do need to do something here to guard against someone re-adding without difficulty information.
Best Regards,
Andy (from OSM's Data Working Group)
SomeoneElse (2025-08-25 19:12:45+00:00): Hello,
I've edited the southeast change in here in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170993268 .
The key changes were:
1) ensure that the actual OSM ways (with e.g. sac_scale) were restored, so that everyone can see that they are not "regular paths".
2) ensure that they were NOT tagged "highway=path", so they won't appear on regular maps and apps.
The iffy ascent through the "ford" I've changed to "highway=scramble" - that shouldn't appear on any regular "walk in a park" apps any time soon.  If even that's still wrong, let me know and we can change it again.
The other one https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1192129593 I've changed to "not:highway=path" since it seems to be a bit of wishful thinking on behalf of someone or their GPS.
Looking at the GPS traces https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=20/56.6577074/-4.9896357&layers=HG is helpful - they're all over the place, and most people making this "ascent" do so to the west of where the previous "path" was in OSM.
Best Regards,
Andy (from the DWG)
SomeoneElse (2025-08-25 19:22:16+00:00): ... and the northwest change I've done in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170994103 .
I've explicitly added that back as "not a path", to stop someone adding it from imagery (where it is still somewhat visible) or GPS traces.
dmlls (2025-07-28 12:02:27+00:00): Hola BigRedPie, y gracias por tus contribuciones.

Solo una cosilla con las opening_hours. Quizás debido a correcciones automáticas, pero veo que en al menos un par de ocasiones (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13018690985, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12988582193) has mezclado diferentes guiones en las opening_hours (- vs. –).

En caso de que no la conozcas, te recomiendo validar las opening_hours con esta herramienta https://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/. Verás que te dice: 'Please use notation "-" for "–". Although using "–" is typographical correct, it is not defined in the opening_hours syntax.'

Espero que esto ayude!

Un saludo,
Diego
BigRedPie (2025-07-28 12:32:47+00:00): Hola, pues tienes toda la razón seguramente. No se ve claramente la diferencia entre ambos caracteres y al copiar desde la web de los comercios u otro lugar me parecen idénticos.

Habrá más de un par de comercios.... A ver ahora cómo corrijo los que estén mal :O
dmlls (2025-07-28 14:37:49+00:00): No te preocupes, nos pasa a todos :)

En principio no he visto más, pero puedes mirar de vez en cuando con Osmose, ahí puedes ver todos los elementos que has editado y que tienen algún tipo de problema (https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/byuser/BigRedPie). No quiere decir que todos estos problemas los hayas introducido tú, simplemente se atribuyen al último usuario que ha modificado el elemento en cuestión.
BigRedPie (2025-07-29 11:17:40+00:00): Guau! Me acabo de fijar que con solo tocar elementos se asignan fallos a cada cosa :O

¡Anda que no hay listado para revisar! Gracias porque no sabía de ese apartado
dmlls (2025-07-31 13:26:18+00:00): Sí es un poco lo malo de la herramienta, pero aún así muy útil para corregir fallos, propios o ajenos jeje.

De nada y happy mapping!
evgenykatyshev (2025-07-23 13:38:10+00:00): Innacurate edit with deletetion existed objects based only on iD validator without any validation on the ground or local knowledge. To be reverted.
evgenykatyshev (2025-07-23 14:18:27+00:00): Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169346266
archie (2025-07-23 09:38:31+00:00): Din cs med namnändring har reverterats. Anledningen härtill kan du ta del av kommentaren till en tidigare cs: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146831691.
Pmz (2025-07-24 06:18:26+00:00): Bonjour,
Cette réparation n'en n'est pas une, vous allez à l'encontre de la situation sur le terrain. La voie "boulevard desaix" longeant le batiment au nord n'es plus connectée au boulevard desaix (voie principale). Elle est bien connectée à la rue Nestor Perret en imposant aux véhicules de tourner à droite. Si vous voulez maintenir la continuité d'un itinéraire piéton, je pense qu'il aurai été mieux de faire passer celui-ci par les trottoirs dont les tracés sont matérialisés. Je vous laisse revenir en arrière pour corriger cette situation. Bonne journée
evgenykatyshev (2025-07-23 13:35:05+00:00): I see you delete ways that actually exist just because they don't connected to the other ways. It's absolutely destructive behaviour.

Also you've changed Georgian name to the English in the main name tag. Which is against local rules.

At the same time the majority of your edits bring not so valuable data. It's semi-automatical edits based on presets in iD which can be made automatically.

Thus I'll revert all your edits in Georgia and report you to admins with proposal to revert your edits in other countries.
evgenykatyshev (2025-07-23 13:38:18+00:00): Innacurate edit with deletetion existed objects based only on iD validator without any validation on the ground or local knowledge. To be reverted.
evgenykatyshev (2025-07-23 14:18:30+00:00): Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169346294
FroschForscher (2025-07-23 15:20:35+00:00): Hallo Sonjo willkommen bei OSM,
die meisten Häuser sind rechtwinklig gebaut. Das lässt sich auch in OSM ganz einfach erreichen: Rechts-klick > Rechtwinklig machen

FroschForscher
Hufkratzer (2025-07-23 19:11:53+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/465980657 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/142708615 sind keine Reitanlagen, das sind irgendwelche Gebäude (Führanlage?, Longierhalle?), deshalb waren sie mit building=yes getaggt und du hast sie auf leisure=horse_riding (Reitanlage) umgetaggt. Ohne ein building=* Tag werden sie nicht mehr als Gebäude auf der Karte dargestellt.

Beispieö für eine Reitanlage:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/117203231
Vgl.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a/R#Reitstall
Bobropiton (2025-07-25 09:00:08+00:00): Вы что то перепутали. Выборг через приморск НЕ делает остановки в белоострове. В отличии от поезда на/из Советск(а)
spbima (2025-07-25 13:30:49+00:00): Да, согласен, перепутал с электричкой на/из Советск(а).
Спасибо за исправление.
evgenykatyshev (2025-07-23 13:19:27+00:00): Hello! What iD suggestions do you mean?

I briefly reviewed you changes, and I have doubts about deleting this building passage: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1154757558/history#map=19/41.643518/41.638986

It seems that iD said this way isn't connected to other roads. It was needed to connect it, but I've deleted it instead.
evgenykatyshev (2025-07-23 13:38:24+00:00): Innacurate edit with deletetion existed objects based only on iD validator without any validation on the ground or local knowledge. To be reverted.
evgenykatyshev (2025-07-23 14:18:32+00:00): Changeset has been reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169346316
marczoutendijk_repair (2025-08-04 18:50:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 169971828, 169971827 where the changeset comment is: ¨DWG
bsvka (2025-09-22 19:08:25+00:00): Can you give insight into this discussion https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4967131? Regarding the fee on the toilets.
Sylabowy Kot (2025-07-23 09:33:29+00:00): Zmiana nie obejmuje nowego układu jezdni, skrzyżowań po przebudowach.
Szymson (2025-07-23 12:37:46+00:00): Kolego co Ty tutaj nawyrabiałeś?
stasiu512 (2025-07-23 12:49:42+00:00): Co autor miał na myśli? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1302254014
bartgron (2025-07-23 15:21:08+00:00): Zestaw zmian wycofany:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169350928
NeisBot (2025-07-23 09:39:49+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
Larmax (2025-07-23 10:52:14+00:00): Miksi poistit esim. tuon hissin ja katulmapun? Ärsyttävää kun sun sotkuja pitää jatkuvasti siivoilla
Larmax (2025-07-23 22:42:51+00:00): Palautin nyt osan tekemistäsi muutoksista. Olit näemmä myös poistanut fixme-tägejä, joista olit saanut blockit aikaisemmin, mutta miksi? Mitä hyötyä siitä on kellekään?
liljaadeliina (2025-08-13 06:36:37+00:00): Niiden poistaminen saattoi olla vahinko tai tein sen epähuomiossa.
Larmax (2025-08-13 16:25:08+00:00): Miten sinulla on niin kova kiire tehdä muokkauksia, että näin on käynyt useamman kerran?
Dawid2849 (2025-07-23 09:50:48+00:00): W sumie to po prostu obecna, bo nowa to ona nie jest :P
Leo Slager (2025-07-23 22:39:15+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
A67-A67 (2025-07-25 11:04:36+00:00): In deze wijziging wordt het woongebied (landuse=residential) verwijderd. Ik heb deze teruggezet.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=169334927
Sander H (2025-07-25 13:52:52+00:00): Hoe heb ik dat nou weer voor elkaar gekregen? Dank je.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-07-23 10:31:25+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10069321665
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/695806451

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
fortera_au (2025-08-01 23:47:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 169841222, 169841249, 169841240, 169841260, 169841200, 169841256, 169841237, 169841215, 169841214, 169841228, 169841245, 169841232 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: incompatible source
rajashekhar_n (2025-08-13 10:22:16+00:00): Hello AdityaRahman,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Please follow some practices while editing on OSM.
Avoid adding duplicate data, zoom in to make edits to avoid any overlaps, for buildings, draw from the building edge.
Please watch this video - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E1YJV6I_rhY, this will help to start.
Please square the buildings (use Q from the keyboard) when it is needed.
Do not ignore the validation warning messages.
Happy Mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169335906
tastrax (2025-07-24 00:38:38+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, +61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features#Phone_Numbers .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
NorthCrab_upload (2025-07-23 10:41:18+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11302216667
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12300221329
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12300221327
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12300221326
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11400932523
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11400932521
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1416716609
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1416716610
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1416716617
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1416716618
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1416716606
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1416716607

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2025-07-23 10:51:12+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1416717025

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-07-23 17:26:25+00:00): thanks for investigation and fix!
gurglypipe (2025-07-23 21:49:27+00:00): No problem :) geograph.org.uk is a great tool for this kind of thing for questions in the UK, if you need to use it in future (and appropriately licensed so it’s OK to use in OSM)
HeinerSchaefer (2025-11-14 11:13:11+00:00): Hallo wies1,
in diesem Änderungssatz ist mir der Weg 141671761 aufgefallen, weil er überhaupt keine Merkmale hat.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1416717614#map=15/50.20219/6.84285

Gibt es einen Grund für diesen Weg?
Ist es vielleicht ein Versehen?
Oder kann der weg?

Viele Grüße
Heiner
wies1 (2025-11-14 17:32:36+00:00): Hallo,
danke für den Hinweis.

Das war ein Versehen, so dass ich es soeben gelöscht habe. 

Gruss

wies1
Leo Slager (2025-07-23 22:41:30+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
NorthCrab_upload (2025-07-23 11:27:07+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12087347402
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1416717025

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NeisBot (2025-07-23 13:09:45+00:00): Hello Physik15, welcome to OSM, and thank you for your contributions!

I've taken a look at your recent edits and wanted to discuss a few discrepancies I noticed regarding the surrounding environmental features. Specifically, the locations in your edits don't seem to align with the typical geographical characteristics expected in that area. Here are some (max 10) relevant links to the edits:
https://osm.org/node/13018852500

Could you please take a look?
Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#Somewhere
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=169337938
NeisRevert (2025-07-28 06:41:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/169593861
where the changeset comment is: 
Remove misplaced data
Andrea Del Sarto (2025-07-27 20:22:39+00:00): Buonasera Fiero Brigante

inserire nel tag name il numero del percorso non è corretto secondo le linee guida di inserimento dei percorsi escursionistici CAI-OSM, che puoi trovare qui https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:CAI
Per prima cosa il tag name va usato solo il percorso ha un nome, tipo <Sentiero degli Alpini> e poi perchè il codice da te inserito fa riferimento al tag ref
Puoi sistemare? grazie

saluti e buona mappatura
NorthCrab_upload (2025-07-23 11:27:10+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Sójkowa":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/127765558
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/127765564
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/127765567
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/127765571
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/127765574
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/127765579
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/127789733
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/127789737
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/127789739
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/127789741
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/127789744
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/127789745
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/127789751
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/127789755
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/127789759
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/127789760

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Yog Sot (2025-07-23 15:42:58+00:00): dobrze, że Czeremcha jest warta Poznania
IreuN (2025-07-23 15:44:59+00:00): No tak wyszło ;)
ivanbranco (2025-07-27 20:31:37+00:00): Ciao Fiero Brigante,

come mai hai cambiato i nomi delle highway  da "Via" a "via"?
czebureks (2025-09-30 09:40:03+00:00): Cześć, czy istnieje jakiś powód, by granica administracyjna nie była połączona z landuse? Jeżeli tak, to moim zdaniem to "landuse" powinien ustąpić - granica administracyjna przebiega precyzyjnie w miejscach, gdzie wyznaczono granicę działek i nie powinno się jej przesuwać "parę metrów" w lewo czy prawo.
czebureks (2025-09-30 10:06:59+00:00): Aczkolwiek "landuse" również powinien być maksymalnie precyzyjny - jeżeli w czymś przeszkadza to, że mają wspólne węzły, to wystarczy odkleić granicę od reszty i będzie dobrze. Najwyżej wyskoczy błąd w JOSM-ie, ale lepsze to niż utrata precyzji danych.
Marek-M (2025-09-30 10:13:47+00:00): Bezpośredniej informacji dotyczącej niesklejania landuse z boundary nie znalazłem ale podążając za tokiem myślowym np. w wątku https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/sklejanie-zagospodarowania-przestrzennego-z-drogami/62236 naturalne wydaje mi się rozłączanie takich dwóch bytów niepowiązanych ze sobą. Granica administracyjna jest bytem wirtualnym, zwykle bez oznaczenia w terenie a łąki i pola mają zwykle widoczny podział geograficzny np. na ortofoto.

Może nie jest do końca poprawne zmienianie precyzyjnej geometrii linii boundary ale w wielu przypadkach łatwiej jest edytować pojedyncze punkty tej linii niż kilkudziesięciu obszarów landuse. Staram się przy takich edycjach aby przemieszczenie węzłów było minimalne. Następnym razem postaram się aby te rozbieżności były jeszcze mniejsze.
czebureks (2025-09-30 11:16:13+00:00): Zapytałem społeczności na Discordzie, może coś nam doradzą w tej kwestii.
grzegorz75jan (2025-09-30 11:56:31+00:00): Granice są nietykalne.
Taya_S (2025-07-23 12:36:28+00:00): Hello BholeKiBhasam,

You've added `intermittent=no + layer=-1 + tunnel=culvert` to a lot of the waterways here. Was this intentional?

Best regards,
Taya Snijder
BholeKiBhasam (2025-07-24 01:53:36+00:00): g'day once again, most of the time i use Bing map and it shows it as not a regular stream out on the land but like inside in a crevice and has good water flow at the end in two ponds...since it is natural form so culvert didnt appeared good to use, i had asked about it and was recommended to use something close to natural form...
lpf452 (2025-07-25 15:23:22+00:00): Hey bro, thanks for correcting my tag spelling mistake!

Without your correction, I might not have known for a long time that my 'operator' tag was wrong (JOSM does not warn about tag spelling mistakes because it considers it a custom tag)...
infeeeee (2025-07-24 18:32:09+00:00): Hello! Welcome to OpenStreetMap!

If you can't speak Hungarian reply, and I will translate this to English.

Szia! Üdv az OpenStreetMapen!

Ha egy üzlet, étterem egy másik (korábban bezárt) üzlet helyén nyílik, akkor ne töröld a régi pontot, hanem csak az adatokat módosítsd rajta, a régi címkéket töröld. Így megmarad az üzlethelyiség története, egyszerűen visszanézhető mi volt ott korábban. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history

Ezt javítottam itt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169415698

Ha kérdésed merülne fel, a magyar szerkesztő közösség elérhetőségeit megtalálod ezen az oldalon: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hungary/Közösség#Elérhetőségek

További jó térképezést!
Bauer33333 (2025-08-13 22:07:59+00:00): Hello, thank you for your contribution. Sadly it seems like you were mapping based on outdated imaginery, most of Jenny Avenue as well as the sidewalks do not exist anymore. The Esri Clarity layer that was used is not updated anymore and usually out of date. While the layer can still be handy to see details it would be nice if you could verify in the future that what you are mapping is actually existing before doing stuff like going straight thru buildings. Eg. by flipping once thru all the available image layers.
Thank you