piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
gscholz (2026-01-11 09:17:55+00:00): Hi Jojolaglandouille,
this changeset has destroyed this meadow relation:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20061393/history#map=16/45.54665/3.70932

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=3.70942&lat=45.54612&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

I have just fixed this. Please be careful if you edit relations with ID, use JOSM instead.
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2026-01-11 09:25:47+00:00): Hi Jojolaglandouille,
this changeset has left behind a broken residential relation for "Germanangues" as well:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20061390/history#map=19/45.555273/3.703249

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=3.70286&lat=45.55531&zoom=18&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

I have just fixed this. Please be careful if you edit relations with ID, use JOSM instead.

I recomend to learn some basics about relations an the meaning of their roles:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation

Kind regards
Guido
Natfoot (2026-03-09 06:14:43+00:00): can you verify which crossing is 096202N 
each crossing has a blue ENS tag. they can be mapped as ref:fra_crossing=096202N
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177006748
Natfoot (2026-03-09 06:15:21+00:00): you can find the crossing data here:
https://www.fra.dot.gov/railcrossinglocator
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177006748
smeòrach (2026-03-09 09:56:12+00:00): delighted to see the Braes of Angus getting filled in! thank you!
habi (2026-01-09 08:40:07+00:00): Ciao sfwd
Ich bin nicht sicher, ob du hier nicht grad das Gegenteil von dem gemacht hast, was du erreichen wolltest.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/747419168/history/1 ist als Klippe erfasst, hier hast du die Klippe zu einem Pfad umgewandelt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/747419168/history/2
Dieser "alte Pfad" ist zwar nicht mit anderem Wegen verbunden, es könnten aber Menschen hierdurch geführt werden.
Kannst du erklären, welcher Pfad genau nicht mehr begehbar ist, und wo die Absperrung ist?
Gruss aus Bern,
habi
habi (2026-01-09 08:47:57+00:00): Ich habe den "alten Pfad" in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177015518 wieder zu einer Klippe gemacht, die ja nicht einfach plötzlich weg ist :)
Wenn du genau sagen kannst, welcher Pfad wie gesperrt ist, kann das sicher auch in OSM eingetragen werden.
KHALID ALOMRI (2026-01-09 04:59:39+00:00): 👍🏼
NeisBot (2026-01-09 06:47:25+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 14 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/31116276 v15 | 7 crossings
https://osm.org/way/432220612 v2 | 4 crossings
https://osm.org/way/31116227 v11 | 3 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177007807
NeisReview (2026-01-17 16:43:44+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/177271208
Baloo Uriza (2026-01-09 16:15:07+00:00): This got added between the two westbound traffic lanes.  Was this supposed to be on the lamp post just north of this location?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177008529
Robert Whittaker (2026-01-13 16:03:28+00:00): Hi Riley,

In this changeset, you added a Defibrillator https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13441700701 with the location description "Bromley Cross Train Station". However, the location you placed it at on the map is in a nearby housing estate about 500m away by foot.

Can you check whether the location you added this AED and/or its location description is correct?

(I see that you also added another AED at the station in node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13441701101 .)
Robert Whittaker (2026-01-13 16:07:58+00:00): Hi Riley,

In this changeset you added an AED: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13441701101

You specified it as being outdoors (indoor=no) but you placed the node inside a building. Could you check if one of the location or tagging needs correcting?

Also, it would be helpful if you could provide a bit more detail in the location description. Can you say exactly where the AED is to be found at Bromley Cross station? Can you write a description that would send someone straight to the right place on the station in an emergency?
NeisBot (2026-01-09 06:53:11+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13441717126 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "คลินิกสตรีและผู้หญิง"
---
ตัวอย่างเช่น รูปแบบที่เป็นกลางและเป็นข้อเท็จจริงมากกว่าของข้อความของคุณอาจเป็น "คลินิกสตรีและผู้หญิง"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-18 10:58:48+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177368240
(Deleted leftovers after several edits)
Nakaner (2026-01-09 15:36:33+00:00): Hallo,

an der Fritz-Erler-Straße war der Gehweg bereits durch sidewalk=right an der Fahrbahn erfasst. Dadurch ist er jetzt doppelt erfasst. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/223054686/history

In OSM gibt es zwei Erfassungarten für Gehwege – als Tags an der Straße und als eigenständiger Way. Beide Varianten haben ihre Anhänger. Variante 1 wird nur verwendet, wenn der Weg nicht  baulich (bloß Bordstein, kein Grünstreifen) von der Fahrbahn getrennt ist. Variante 2 kann immer verwendet werden. Sie führt jedoch zu unnötigen Umwegen, weil nicht alle Überquerungsmöglichkeiten der Fahrbahn modelliert werden können. Bei Variante 2 muss der Gehweg noch mit einem footway=sidewalk versehen werden und an der Fahrbahn sidewalk=separate erfasst werden.

In der Fritz-Erler-Straße kann man den Gehweg getrennt erfassen, da wegen der Bahn in der Mitte die Straße sowieso nur an bestimmten Stellen überquert werden kann. Bitte übertrage daher noch die an der Fahrbahn erfassten Gehweg-Attribute zur Oberfläche (sidewalk:right:surface=*) an den Gehweg und lösche sie danach an der Fahrbahn.

Viele Grüße

Michael
NeisBot (2026-01-09 06:53:13+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13441784972 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Digital marketing agency in Madurai"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-01-18 10:58:49+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/177021205
GrabTH_Bulakorn (2026-01-09 06:40:51+00:00): Edit: source also from local knowledge
WWSS (2026-04-04 02:23:49+00:00): 拜託先用 google 地圖確認一下實況再畫吧！

明明水道上的路是架橋跨過，卻全都畫成涵管從底下鑽!?
Supaplex (2026-04-04 17:55:11+00:00): @WWSS

請留意OpenStreetMap計劃是不能抄襲商業地圖，㝯括Google地圖，並且著重實地踏查或是處理開放資料來繪製地圖。我想您也看了不少OSM Wiki記錄以及討論，維持整體資料庫的資料來源沒問題，才能滿跑開放的授權方式讓其他人再利用。

FYR：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Don%27t_copy_from_other_maps
NeisBot (2026-01-10 07:29:12+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13439096764 v4

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Flooring store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-01-18 10:58:49+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/177363818
Superadlen (2026-01-11 18:45:44+00:00): merci
VLD0251 (2026-01-12 23:09:29+00:00): Hello,
You added a cemetery here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1465515671.
current satellite imagery does not show any trace of it at this location
is this a recent development, a positioning error, or based on a local survey?
could you please clarify your sources?
Happy mapping!
Superadlen (2026-01-13 09:37:27+00:00): Ops..
Is grave. Sorry
VLD0251 (2026-01-13 12:56:07+00:00): Hello Superadlen, no worries: i was simply commenting on the changeset for user test0022012. 
Happy mapping!
Superadlen (2026-01-18 07:47:27+00:00): thanks...
user_8655426 (2026-01-09 11:30:35+00:00): Hello, and thank you for mapping in Japan.

Could you please make your changeset area smaller?  
You also didn't add a "source = *" tag.  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

About “浜名バイパス” you edited: this road does not have any Korean name on signs.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31963678
Is “하마나바이패스” a name, or is it only a pronunciation?  
Please tell us the source of the Korean names you added to features in Japan.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177012286
aaei924 (2026-01-09 12:42:59+00:00): こんにちは、
ご意見いただきましてありがとうございます。

JOSMで一括して作業する家庭の中で、Changesetが大きくなりました。もっと注意します。

韓国語の表記は、普段日本の道路は韓国語の標識がないし、他の公式の韓国語の表記も確認できないし、適当に合理的な方法で翻訳しました。

それで、韓国の「外来語表記法」によって地名を転写してから、「高速道路」や「バイパス」などを韓国語で翻訳しました。

「バイパス」は日本語でも「Bypass」を翻訳しないで使用していますので、その方式を尊重して「바이패스」と書きました。
user_8655426 (2026-01-09 13:25:55+00:00): ご説明、ありがとうございます。
「翻訳」されたとのことですが、私にはそのような編集が良いのか悪いのか判断できません。ですが、Wikiには以下のようなページがあります。

・JA:多国語の名称 (「存在しないものには名称をタグ付けしないでください」。とあります。)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:多国語の名称
・JA:名称#翻字 (一部のみ、日本語化。)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:名称#翻字
・JA:グッドプラクティス (検証可能性)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:グッドプラクティス#検証可能性

aaei924さんの編集は日本全体に及び、駅名や鉄道などの大量のデータが変更されています。
Wikiのページを読まれたうえで、日本のコミュニティに相談されるのが良いと思います。

・OpenSreetMap Japan (Discord)
https://discord.com/invite/pNuUM99kUX
・メーリングリスト
https://openstreetmap.jp/ML
aaei924 (2026-01-09 16:01:35+00:00): ご案内、ありがとうございます。

まず、提示してもらったWikiページを読みました。Mappin' Jack Flashさんの憂慮を了解しました。よく参考しまして、コミュニティに相談されてみます。

これからもっと努力しますが、一つの名称を変わる際は、その対象がいろんな地域にかける場合があります。適切な方法を探してみます。
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-01-09 22:11:36+00:00): According to the OSM Wiki, it's best to map each individual unit of the terraced house, especially if each unit has its own address. See more info here: building=terrace and house=terraced
edqxzv9b (2026-01-09 07:27:51+00:00): I have made a grave mistake. Routing still sees that little nib of road I left (beginning at the traffic light and ending at the right turn off of Beeline Westbound towards West Blue Heron Blvd Eastbound) and STILL wants to route users through a cement/steel construction barricade .
DerKaiserschmarren (2026-01-13 13:50:37+00:00): Hallo, üblicherweise benennt man solche objekte nicht, sondern fügt einfach nur die tags
"sport=sportart1;sportart2" hinzu. Außer er ist so angeschrieben versteht sich ;)
schobbish (2026-01-09 23:43:45+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM! It looks like you meant to add a business to the map but ended up modifying the Frisco city boundary instead. This change will be reverted by me or someone else in a bit.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177012815
schobbish (2026-01-09 23:49:53+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177045108
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-12 04:23:38+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13439262187

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-12 06:33:44+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13439262187

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-12 04:23:37+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13439249390

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-12 06:33:37+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13439249390

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Taya_S (2026-01-09 11:13:13+00:00): Reverted deletions by sockpuppet account. See: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19417

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177021201
Taya_S (2026-01-09 11:13:14+00:00): Reverted deletions by sockpuppet account. See: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19417

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177021201
NeisBot (2026-01-09 07:56:17+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your changesets and noticed that the cumulative count of your recent edits (2 changesets) shows that 325 of your last 326 changes were deletions. This is quite an unusual proportion, so I wanted to check with you.

Could you please confirm whether these deletions were intentional or if they may have occurred by mistake?

#DeletionsCheck #Cumulative
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?uid=23689678
Taya_S (2026-01-09 11:13:15+00:00): Reverted deletions by sockpuppet account. See: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19417

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177021201
Taya_S (2026-01-09 11:13:16+00:00): Reverted deletions by sockpuppet account. See: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19417

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177021201
infeeeee (2026-01-28 11:42:18+00:00): Szia!

Ezzel kapcsolatban írok: https://osm.org/way/1462271349

Facebook oldalak címét nem a website hanem contact:facebook mezőben tároljuk. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:contact:facebook

További jó térképezést!
infeeeee (2026-02-04 18:27:08+00:00): Javítottam itt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178106900
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2026-01-10 23:24:54+00:00): This changeset removed all connections from Anderson Loop West to I10 North
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177014257
Tinetto (2026-01-14 04:36:28+00:00): Hi Spaghetti Monster🍝

I made the edit based on internal feedback, but seems like I missed deleting way 15126522. I have made the corrections, and it should all be in order now. Thank you for your message. Please let me know if it is OK and you have any further concerns regarding my changeset.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2026-01-14 04:46:01+00:00): Is the new ramp open?
Tinetto (2026-01-16 08:38:00+00:00): Hi Spaghetti Monster🍝
The latest GPS traces show no activity, so I don't think the ramp is open to traffic yet.
NeisBot (2026-01-10 07:29:17+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13441883169 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Layanan pembuatan website dan undangan digital"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-18 10:58:49+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177368241
tastrax (2026-01-09 09:54:49+00:00): Many thanks for your contributions - welcoem to OSM. It would be great if you could adjust the Microsoft Buildings. Many are skewed and other just plain wrong. This is especially so when there is great imagery in this area. Best to do it once and do it well. Saves others having to come back and adjust your edits. Cheers
Indole (2026-01-11 09:23:27+00:00): will try - how accurate does the building need to be though?
tastrax (2026-01-11 10:02:42+00:00): When you have good imagery it can be very detailed like this... https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=19/-42.885737/147.426970
Indole (2026-01-11 10:09:39+00:00): got it; i can do that;
eggie (2026-01-09 08:48:10+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback   Het kan eigenlijk niet kloppen zo. Welk bord staat hier vooraan?
Je hebt motor_vehicle=no getagd? 
Dat zijn niet alleen auto's.
Dan lijkt het me handiger een paaltje toe te voegen. barrier=bollard
Eenrichtingsverkeer? Voor wie en hoe kan dat met paaltjes?
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-01-09 09:00:38+00:00): Ik heb het aangepast aan de nieuwe situatie met aan weerszijden barrier=bollard met bollard =removable
oneway=yes heb ik verwijderd. Dat kan fysiek niet.
Het routeert nu niet meer voor motorvoertuigen 
motor_vehicle=no verwijderd. motorvoertuigen routeren niet door paaltjes in osm muv moped en mofa.

MVG
eggie
Solaris07 (2026-07-17 03:52:12+00:00): Hey, just letting you know that it's not a good idea to add Microsoft Building Footprints in Australia, as they're usually very inaccurate (which is the case here).

Thanks,
Solaris
jack walker2 (2026-01-09 12:57:25+00:00): 你好，如果有时间的话请帮忙增补绥化市北部，尤其是东富镇的村庄名称。我不熟悉这里。
BG2EWI (2026-01-09 15:48:19+00:00): OK
TangledRockets (2026-01-10 16:41:48+00:00): Hi Rallioz,

Pass auf, etwas ist schief gelaufen bei diesem Changeset. 

Siehe:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1465523245/history#map=18/50.366586/7.597738

Grüße, TR
Rallioz (2026-01-10 18:19:54+00:00): Oh je, danke für den Hinweis. Ist repariert :)
VG
TangledRockets (2026-01-11 13:17:26+00:00): Kein ding :)
Frohes schaffen!
MxxCon (2026-01-10 01:10:08+00:00): Hello.
Is this actually real "Flock Safety" camera or another brand and you just tagged it as Flock?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177015336
MxxCon (2026-01-10 01:10:17+00:00): Hello.
Is this actually real "Flock Safety" camera or another brand and you just tagged it as Flock?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177015388
pangoSE (2026-07-22 19:48:36+00:00): Thanks for fixing the relation :)
habi (2026-01-09 08:46:58+00:00): Und den Verlauf der Klippe an swissALTI3D angepasst, sowie die Ausdehnung der Ruine Grasburg an den Katasterplan Bern
MxxCon (2026-01-10 01:10:25+00:00): Hello.
Is this actually real "Flock Safety" camera or another brand and you just tagged it as Flock?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177016036
HellMap (2026-01-09 13:16:39+00:00): Hello,

You are again changing compacted to unpaved, which is incorrect. Please see the comments at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177016291.

You are also mass-changing road classification and it's still not clear what criteria you are using.
eggie (2026-01-09 09:19:18+00:00): Welkom bij OSM,

De info heb ik samengevoegd met de al bestaande adresnode. Het lijkt me verder oke zo.

MVG
eggie
AylinJellybean (2026-01-09 15:12:59+00:00): Hi,
du hast mit deinem Änderungssatz die Relation 6192557 (Bus 412) bearbeitet und dabei den network und route Schlüssel gelöscht, sowie type von route zu site geändert. Das sieht mir sehr nach einem Fehler aus. Auch hast du die Relation 20062408 angelegt, was mir hier unnötig erscheint. Ich würde die beiden Änderungen revidieren, wenn du einverstanden bist.
Pixel Kraft (2026-01-09 15:23:47+00:00): Hallo ,
Ich wollte lediglich unser Unternehmen dort eintragen.  Mir sind da wohl ein paar Fehler unterlaufen. Tut mir Leid. 

Ja ,kannst du machen.  Ich hoffe,ich habe das Unternehmen zumindest richtig eingetragen..

Vielen Dank.
Vielen Dank.
AylinJellybean (2026-01-09 15:34:55+00:00): Für Unternehmen ist es meines Wissens nach eigentlich üblich, einen extra Punkt auf dem Gebäude zu setzten und dort alle relevanten Informationen zu hinterlegen. Siehe z. B. Knoten 8001069590. Ich würde das dementsprechend abändern.
Pixel Kraft (2026-01-09 15:40:22+00:00): Ja, diese Funktion hatte ich leider nicht gefunden.

Herzlichen Dank fürs nochmal drüber schauen und korrigieren.
AylinJellybean (2026-01-09 15:54:19+00:00): Ich habe die Änderung rückgängig gemacht. Siehe changeset 177031752. Für das Unternehmen habe ich einen extra Punkt angelegt. Siehe changeset 177031470.
NeisBot (2026-01-10 07:29:22+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/184284624 v5

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Unternehmen für KI-Anwendungen in Groitzsch"
---
Zum Beispiel könnte eine neutralere und sachlichere Version deines Textes lauten: "Unternehmen für KI-Anwendungen in Groitzsch"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam