piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
tux67 (2024-08-19 07:52:08+00:00): Das Rathaus ist bereits als Relation gemappt - siehe: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13377
Andrea Musuruane (2024-09-02 13:08:51+00:00): Ciao. access=no implica che non ci può entrare nessuno. Mai. E' inutile aggiungere bicycle=no, foot=no, ... Ciao, Andrea
Andrea Musuruane (2024-09-02 13:09:38+00:00): Ciao. access=no implica che non ci può entrare nessuno. Mai. E' inutile aggiungere bicycle=no, foot=no, ... Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/155382801
Claudev8 (2024-09-03 08:44:52+00:00): Ciao, ok grazie.
wies1 (2024-08-17 17:55:03+00:00): Kommentar vergessen - Hier wurden Gebäude bearbeitet
Colin Smale (2024-08-17 20:35:59+00:00): I think you have spelled Millennium wrong... Can you fix it please?
Colin Smale (2024-08-17 20:37:40+00:00): Please fix it in ALL of these changesets
mrpacmanmap (2024-08-23 01:10:40+00:00): Hello, I believe I have corrected all of the mistakes now. Thank you for pointing it out. I've now turned on the spell checker on my browser. :)
Colin Smale (2024-08-23 13:14:10+00:00): Thanks!
tyfi (2024-08-17 18:06:06+00:00): Let the downstream companies like Mapbox abbreviate the road names. It's much easier to convert from un-abbreviated to abbreviated than vice-versa
aTarom (2024-08-18 07:09:38+00:00): hola, los name descriptivos no encajan bien en la Base de Datos, me puedes confirmar que se trata de nombres descriptivos:
"parque de perros"
"playa de perros"
para la playa donde se permiten perros tienes el tag
dog=yes
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:dog
en combinación con
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dbeach
te parece bien?
Saludos
danielperezglez (2024-08-19 10:07:22+00:00): he mejorado los datos del POI.
Realmente es que la playa aparece identificada por el ayuntamiento como "Playa Can" y para uso humano tiene poco o nulo potencial
tyfi (2024-08-17 18:10:07+00:00): It was already mostly secondary, but some small bits were randomly primary.
dieterdreist (2024-08-24 18:50:06+00:00): not a castle
Peter Elderson (2025-11-21 13:04:26+00:00): Hoi @dvdhoven, je hebt een heleboel knooppuntrelaties in in de Schoorlse duinen oneway=yes gegeven. Ik kan me voorstellen dat de kleurenrondjes misschien oneway gemarkeerd zijn, maar de knooppuntroutes toch niet?
dvdhoven (2025-11-21 13:21:29+00:00): Hallo Peter,

Ja, de knooppuntroutes zijn dan ook oneway. De bordjes van de gekleurde routes zijn de netwerkbordjes. 
Om een netwerkroute te lopen, volg je de gekleurde pijlen.
Pas als twee gekleurde eenrichting routes, die allebei een andere richting hebben, samen lopen, dan ontstaat een tweerichting route.
Ook kan het zijn dat er een tweerichting LAW of streekpad loopt en dan wordt de route weer tweerichting.
Ik kan me niet herinneren dat ik in de Schoorlse duinen bezig ben geweest, maar in Kennemerland speelt dat ook en daar heb ik het helemaal uitgezocht.
Maar aan Schoorl heb ik geen actieve herinnering.
Overigens geeft de routeplanner van NH ook aan dat er eenrichtingroutes zijn. 

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
dvdhoven (2025-11-21 13:23:11+00:00): Oh, nu zie ik het, je hebt een changeset van Kennemerland gebruikt.
Ja, daar lopen veel eenrichtingroutes en die heb ik uitgeplozen, op wel of niet tweerichting
dvdhoven (2025-11-21 13:27:45+00:00): Oh, nu zie ik het, je hebt een changeset van Kennemerland gebruikt.
Ja, daar lopen veel eenrichtingroutes en die heb ik uitgeplozen, op wel of niet tweerichting
dvdhoven (2025-11-21 13:29:06+00:00): Kijk maar op de routeplanner van NH, zuid van IJmuiden, daar wemelt het van de eenrichtingroutes
Peter Elderson (2025-11-21 13:51:29+00:00): O ja, ik had me vergist in het gebied. Duidelijk, bedankt.
Villainous (2024-11-05 12:25:43+00:00): Co to za ścieżka przez pole?
Stefan Paluch (2024-11-08 19:27:39+00:00): dziękuję za zainteresowanie, tą trasę wyjeździły ciężarówki jeżdżące do żwirowni, droga obok jest solidniejsza - ale stroma (pewnie dlatego zaczęli jeździć górą)
mavl (2024-11-13 06:00:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 159076867, 159076813, 159076848 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible sources - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16857].
tyfi (2024-08-17 18:25:56+00:00): Please do not abbreviate road names! Downstream users and companies can easily abbreviate the names if they want the abbreviated forms, but the abbreviated forms carry less information.
tyfi (2024-08-17 18:27:19+00:00): Spencer Creek Road did not even remotely deserve primary classification, too.
aTarom (2024-08-18 06:56:57+00:00): Hola, el uso de
addr:streetnumber
con igual valor que
addr:housenumber
parece un error,
retiro addr:streetnumber ya que no se aplica a esas calles, cualquier problema me dices.
Saludos
danielperezglez (2024-08-19 06:50:09+00:00): Gracias por la corrección, pensaba que ambas propiedades eran sinónimos. Lo tendre en cuenta en futuras inserciones
Aggår (2024-08-17 18:49:17+00:00): Forgot source 
https://skraafoto.dataforsyningen.dk/?item=2019_82_24_3_0074_00151614&year=2019&center=574171.05%2C6220940.56&item-2=2023_82_24_2_0011_00000400&year-2=2023&orientation=south
osmviborg (2024-08-21 14:42:49+00:00): Mangler der ikke en højde på den ydre polygon?
Aggår (2024-08-24 13:14:45+00:00): Jo, ift 3D ser ikke ordenligt ud, men jeg er ikke sikker på de rigtige mål, og etager.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-28 10:05:25+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12117357630/history has shop = mower_repair that was added in this edit
shop=mower_repair ? Is it about lawnmower repair? Then maybe shop=lawn_mower_repair or shop=lawnmower_repair would be better as more specific? Or shop=repair with some subtag?
shinterro (2025-12-01 04:12:39+00:00): Hi! Thanks, this is a fun one. shop=lawn_mower_repair seems best - far as I recall that's all they do.

I've already updated the tag and will also resurvey when in the area again.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-01 12:52:40+00:00): thanks!
eggie (2024-08-18 06:21:50+00:00): Tip  Svp BAG data ongemoeid laten
source	BAG	
source:date	2014-03-24
Teruggezet.
MVG
eggie
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-10-15 04:44:37+00:00): Czy https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1321927035 też ma ograniczenie dostępu?
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-10-14 12:13:37+00:00): note that photos from OSM notes are hosted only temporarily, see say https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12117381050/history
kakl (2024-08-17 20:18:49+00:00): It is my mistake, everything is OK now.
Syl (2024-08-18 12:45:00+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai enlevé le lien car ce n'est pas le site officiel de l'établissement, c'est juste la page d'un annuaire.
ciaoQuentin (2024-08-20 17:19:30+00:00): L'affichage indique seulement école maternelle, et non école primaire.
Syl (2024-08-20 18:27:54+00:00): Il y avait à la fois le primaire et la maternelle dans OSM. Je viens de corriger en enlevant la maternelle.
ciaoQuentin (2024-08-21 09:48:27+00:00): Très bien.
Pour info, école primaire = école élémentaire + école maternelle, sous la même direction. Dans ce cas là, il faut soit mettre les deux : maternelle et élémentaire, soit juste primaire.
Tomas Straupis (2024-08-20 10:23:45+00:00): Sveikas. Ten, kur geologai pasikeitė į apsaugos tarnybą, gal ir amenity=university nebereikia? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/53836181
Aurimas Fišeras (2024-08-20 10:35:04+00:00): Taip, nereikia.
Tiesiog pražiopsojau keisdamas.
aTarom (2024-08-18 07:29:16+00:00): Hi, thanks for editing, one question please, are the names:
name="Fuente PFM - Punta Prima"
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12117418747/history
name="Fuente PFM - Sant Tomàs"
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12117383697/history
from a reference plaque at the drinking water?
Cheers
vojtechzaboril (2024-08-18 08:02:13+00:00): Hi, the names are from the operator of those water sources. If you find better names which are physically on it, please update it.
b4ckshift (2024-09-13 16:21:36+00:00): No real path or way. People are just trespassing the field.
tyfi (2024-08-17 20:08:53+00:00): The turn restrictions no longer apply since there is no U-turn connection anymore.
ivanbranco (2024-08-18 08:37:15+00:00): Hi A2VI,

please notice that wikimedia_commons=* values need the prefix "File:" or "Category:". Thanks and good mapping!
tonio4open (2024-08-18 10:53:18+00:00): Hi ivanbranco,
Thanks to highlight me that !
It's a typo error (maybe the fatigue on yesterday evening). Because I previously didn't make this error (example : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4424117047).
I just fixed the error in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155408143
Thanks and good mapping you too !
eggie (2024-08-18 07:41:41+00:00): Hoi Dat tafektje is oke, maar name= .....  wordt in OSM niet toegevoegd.
Dat zit al in de tag changing_table opgesloten.
We taggen ook niet name=bankje name=prullenbak. 
Je kunt evt description gebruiken, maar nodig is dat niet.
Ik zal er voorlopig description opzetten.
Groet
eggie
eggie (2024-08-18 07:37:02+00:00): Hoi Je vraagt feedback
Nuttige toevoeging, maar of het werkt? 
Je edits dispenser	recycle bags
Ik ken wel amenity=vending_machine
vending=.... 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Tag_descriptions_for_key_%22vending%22

free	yes?  We kennen wel fee=no

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-08-18 07:46:53+00:00): Anders een vraag voor het forum..
trigpoint (2024-08-24 15:41:18+00:00): Bore da
This edit is incorrect, highway=pedestrian is for pedestrianised streets in town centres. This was correctly mapped as a track.

Maybe with a survey tracktype could be added but I am reverting this.

Diolch Phil
rupertmaesglas (2024-08-25 15:40:19+00:00): Thanks Phil,
Much appreciated - good to get your guidance here. I can't remember when I made that edit, but I'll use the example elsewhere now. I've also learned the 'segregated' conventions, and am trying to train mappers here in the area to do the same.
Thanks for the feedback,

Diolch o'r galon!
rupertmaesglas (2024-08-25 15:50:10+00:00): Ah yes. I changed it because it is not a road for cars, and the area is decimated by 4x4s, who see it as a challenge to there. Local community (me included) are outragfed that this is happening, and I wanted to demonstrate that some careful tagging could help them, and that OpenStreetMap participation was good for them. Obvs, I was not careful enough! "foot"="yes" does just the job.
I'd have to check if it is actually a 'private' road (local families/farmers), but is there something else I could do to deter motorvehicles in this beauty spot? There are terrible mages showing the complete destruction of natural environment here.

Best,

Rupert
pitfire (2024-08-18 02:32:22+00:00): Hallo rohieb,

eine "Teichfläche Fläche:1.109 m² (0,11 ha)Umfang:148,2 m" in der Grössenordnung gibt es hier nicht, oder noch nicht. Mein "Änderungssatz #150019400" entspricht dem aktuellen Stand. 
Zudem läuft ein offenes Verfahren mit ungewissem Ausgang. 
https://ga.de/region/sieg-und-rhein/sankt-augustin/biotop-sankt-augustin_aid-81085755
VG pitfire
BCNorwich (2024-08-18 07:18:55+00:00): Hi, I've removed the bridge tag from the footpaths, also added layer tags to the bridges.
WillFR130 (2024-08-18 07:28:53+00:00): Thank you for your corrections. Please do not edit the "landcover=trees" tags which I have used in this area. I will remove these tags myself when I have finished mapping the tree cover task on my farm. Thank you
BCNorwich (2024-08-18 10:48:11+00:00): Hi, It looks like your landcover tag is being used wrongly, the areas you've mapped are actually individual trees or tree lines as you've previously accepted. As such OSM practice says they should be nodes or linear features not area features. Whatever you add to OSM should be correct ground truth and verifiably. So features of temporary or personal nature should not be added. Thus the landcover tagged areas should be removed. 

You can map temporary or personal features with JOSM and save them without uploading to the OSM database. Perhaps you could use this method ASAP to hold the landcover features for you future use.  

OSM is a live worldwide database from which thousands of maps are compiled. Other users have a right to expect it to be consistent, so I'll continue to correct anyones mapping in order to better OSM.
WillFR130 (2024-08-18 10:58:04+00:00): I appreciate your feedback however I'm struggling to get Josm to work on my laptop at the moment and must use ID. The task will only last a few more days. Then I will delete all the tags which I have created wrongly and use the correct nodes and tags. So please refrain from changing the "landcover=trees" tags at this time. I understand this is a open source public platform which we can all edit.
tyfi (2024-08-17 20:50:27+00:00): It was previously tertiary, but this short road section connects it to a double state route very nearby.
Aleksandar1994 (2024-08-19 07:52:59+00:00): Hi JikJola,

Adding the Okuryangava suburb is very valuable. However, it would be great if you could close this multipolygon if you have local knowledge of the area.

Thanks and happy mapping!

Best,
Aleksandar
JikJola (2024-08-19 17:02:11+00:00): Hi Aleksandra

I will close it later tonight. Thanks
Dodko (2024-08-18 11:39:46+00:00): Ak je možné obchodom pridávajte aj otváraciu dobu.
GretaMN (2024-09-08 10:05:27+00:00): Liebe franzista,
bei mehreren Verkehrszeichen an einem Punkt die in unterschiedliche Richtungen zeigen bitte auch für die Richtung und den Mapillary Link zwei Werte angeben und diese durch ein ; trennen. Das habe ich hier schon berichtigt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12117513708. Gerne nochmal prüfen, ob du es noch an anderen Stellen korrigieren kannst.
Danke! :)
#lgmaps
silversurfer83 (2024-08-18 08:18:25+00:00): Moin luk323 :)

kleiner Hinweis zum Umzug hier:

Wenn du einen POI quer durch die Stadt verschiebst musst du auch eine möglicherweise am POI erfasste Adresse anpassen.

Mein persönlich bevorzugte Variante (deine ist nicht falsch): In meinen Augen beschreibt so ein POI (Versicherungsbüro) die Büroräume an dieser Stelle. Wenn dort die LVM auszieht bleibt der node dort, die Infos ändern sich von "office=insurance" zu "disused:office=insurance" und alle nicht mehr zutreffenden Daten werden entfernt. An der neuen Niederlassung wird entweder ein schon vorhandener node genutzt oder ein neuer node erzeugt, der nun an neuer Stelle das Büro beschreibt. Wenn da übermorgen doch ein Steuerberater einzieht, dann nur die Infos am node ändern.

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/155390438
luk323 (2024-09-22 07:27:47+00:00): Okay, danke für die Infos :)
lonvia (2024-11-03 10:22:22+00:00): The "City of Perth" and "Perth" are not the same. The node must not be label member of the relation in this case. See discussion in https://github.com/osm-search/Nominatim/issues/3573
Udarian (2024-08-17 22:07:02+00:00): bicycle=unknown Is discouraged from being used (aka an incorrect tag) on the osm wiki so it shouldn’t be used; you not knowing if bikes are allowed on a pedestrian path does not need to be tagged, unless there’s a sign saying that bikes aren’t allowed it is implied that you can. For more information see the “ Possible tagging mistakes” section on the following wiki page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bicycle .
eggie (2024-08-18 06:14:51+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback Wanneer het bedrijf herkenbaar is middels een 'bordje' met de bedrijfsnaam kan het worden opgenomen in OSM. Wanneer het alleen om een webshop gaat zoals de website aangeeft en er geen bezoekadres is nemen we webshops niet op in OSM.
De naam op de gebouwomtrek zetten is niet correct. Ik heb die toevoeging verwijderd. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
vasony (2024-08-24 06:43:25+00:00): Szia!

Budapesten a 94/2012. (XII. 27.) önkormányzati rendelet a /a kicsi.

Tamás
gymate (2024-08-24 12:54:49+00:00): Bocsánat, és köszi a javítást! Ezt nem tudtam.

(Kapcsolódó linkek magamnak:
https://net.jogtar.hu/rendelet?council=fovaros&docid=A1200094.FOV&celpara=21&timeshift=20230307&goto=97
https://helyesiras.mta.hu/helyesiras/default/akh12#292 )
Udarian (2024-08-17 22:18:17+00:00): What’s the source for this?
I ask because this does (based on the imagery) very much seem to be a bike path that allows bikes traveling on miller road to navigate the roundabout through the pedestrian crossings by entering the sidewalk network were this way meets the road. This is a common pattern you will see in other parts of Miami dade, were at roundabouts you will see bike paths like this going to the street and thus allowing bicyclists rinding on that road to transfer to the normal sidewalks so that they can cross the roundabout through the same crossing individuals walking will use since it is safer that way.
Also as previously mentioned unless there’s a sign saying that bikes aren’t allowed on this way bikes are allowed and there isn’t any signs showing that in this area (based on the bing imagery available in iD) so bike=no shouldn’t be on this way. Also if this truly isn’t a bike path then it should be a sidewalk.
Udarian (2024-08-27 01:22:30+00:00): Please respond
Udarian (2024-09-11 15:21:41+00:00): Could you please respond
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/155391150
emersonveenstra (2024-08-18 11:56:43+00:00): Hi there,

Thanks for the edits! For length and width, the value needs to be a single value, either in meters (preferably) or feet, not both. That way data consumers can correctly process it. Would you mind fixing these? Thanks!
Nolan McCleery (2024-08-18 14:22:05+00:00): Of course! Thank you for the info!
eggie (2024-08-18 06:18:45+00:00): Dag D Olivier  Je hebt in deze changeset de woonplaats verwijderd?

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=155391966

Ik zal deze terugzetten.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-08-18 07:09:22+00:00): Dag jp  Formeel is hier geen fietspad. Sinds wanneer is er een apart liggend fietspad hier aangelegd?
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-08-18 07:19:36+00:00): Ik heb het fietspad hier weer verwijderd. cycleway:left=shared_lane hier. 
Groet
eggie
eggie (2024-08-18 07:26:00+00:00): Hi  No separate cycleway here..(shared_lane)
I removed the cycleway again...  
I tagged bicycle:forward=use_sidepath
The changing of the streetname was okay.

Greetz,
eggie
Bierphysik (2024-09-21 11:09:40+00:00): Moin. DU hats https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1308517697 gemappt. Sicher dass der Weg so existiert?
FraukeLeo (2024-09-21 11:44:32+00:00): Vielleicht wars nur ne Schneise, aber da geht innerhalb des Waldrandes jedenfalls was lang, was für mich wie ein grade5-Track aussah. Ich bins aber nicht abgelaufen, daher nur den Anfang gemappt.
FraukeLeo (2024-09-21 11:45:15+00:00): Ups, sogar grade4. Hab leider keine Fotos mehr davon.
Bierphysik (2024-09-23 21:33:01+00:00): ich frage weil der weg in DGM nicht zu erkennen ist und parallel recht nah ein track läuft
FraukeLeo (2024-09-23 23:11:55+00:00): Und? Ich hab da einen Weg gesehen. Du kannst hinfahren und nachschauen, und wenn du keinen siehst, dann hab ich halt Gespenster gesehen und er kann aus OSM raus. Ich hab ihn aber nicht in den Wald gefahren und muss deshalb auch nicht erklären, wieso er da ist :)
Bierphysik (2024-09-25 09:53:49+00:00): Jo chill dich plz. Wenn Du den gesehen hast, dann ist der da. Es war mir nur über den OSM Inspector aufgefallen, da der meinte, dass die beiden Wege sehr nah beieinander liegen ohne verbunden zu sein.
Dark Thoughts (2024-08-18 22:18:15+00:00): I'm sorry, I don't know how to remove my edit, but I think this one might've been prematurely as the walls are often overgrown.
Minh Nguyen (2025-08-06 00:18:53+00:00): Whoa, neat to finally see all this detail in the area!
snorehorse (2024-08-17 23:35:48+00:00): The two bridges I deleted have been boarded up and are not passable. This is my first time editing OSM so thank you for the review.
TheBestIdea (2024-08-27 16:35:31+00:00): Hi UrbanUnPlanner,

Southwalk was already mapped as its own thing. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/46593266 It's mapped as currently closed for construction, which I think is correct, and I understand that the plan is for it to be pedestrian only when it re-opens with all bikes on the northwalk. Let me know if you think differently, otherwise way 1308523835 should be removed.
iandees (2024-08-18 02:14:26+00:00): I reverted this because you added too many small pieces of landuse. Please add one contiguous area that matches the landuse instead of many smaller, different shapes.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155394742
watmildon (2024-08-18 01:10:50+00:00): Needs review

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155394029
neri_ (2024-08-19 11:27:19+00:00): Ich vermute das sollte ..zentrum heißen und nicht ..zentrung
Bienson (2024-09-02 19:57:18+00:00): Uff ja, Korrektur korrigiert.
esemenko (2024-08-19 04:49:01+00:00): Why was 80 Bond deleted and replaced with an improperly formed building? All building parts must be contained within a building to show correctly. This needs fixing.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:part
user_11609320 (2024-08-18 02:17:05+00:00): source:https://www.jarpd.org/maps
dcskobuffs (2025-08-19 15:21:07+00:00): Hello ElementoGEO,

I saw you added the route=ferry tag to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/226920744. I am wondering if you know if there are more ferry routes here? I see there are other ways this is connected to such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/226920741 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/227001607 but they do not have a route=ferry tag on them, leaving this route isolated and disconnected. Do you have any more insight on the ferry routes in this area and if there further updates to be made?

Thank you and looking forward to hearing from you,
Dcksobuffs
i2004 (2024-08-18 15:41:27+00:00): https://www.infoblancosobrenegro.com/nota/103869/a-partir-del-proximo-19-de-agosto-la-linea-talp-no-hara-mas-el-recorrido-completo-de-la-plata-a-san-isidro/
tyfi (2024-08-18 04:14:32+00:00): Underscore-suffixed names were promoted to alt_name, and TIGER cruft was removed when redundant.
tyfi (2024-08-18 04:14:58+00:00): See changesets 155354621 and 155348083 for similar work.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-08-23 00:37:46+00:00): Why was administrative boundary changed to golf hole?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/155396279
FTiger74 (2024-08-23 01:41:13+00:00): Sorry I didn't know I changed that I was trying at one point to add in the golf holes in the SE corner of Mason at the park.
literan (2024-08-18 13:11:34+00:00): это проектируемая ВСМ, смотрите на теги (railway=proposed)
Ramesh Shavkero (2024-08-19 10:23:51+00:00): Сколько оно лет будет проектироваться? Беспредел какой то. Гаражи будут снесены?
literan (2024-08-19 10:39:45+00:00): откуда мне знать, сколько лет. Вопросы к Правительству РФ.

Гаражи в Москве обещают снести все вообще к 2027 году, насколько я слышал.
Lumikeiju (2024-08-18 05:21:52+00:00): Refer to Changeset: 155397040 for Part 2 and details.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155397040
Lumikeiju (2024-08-18 05:23:10+00:00): Refer to Changeset: 155397028 for Part 1. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155397028

----

These two changesets edited no geometry and made the following tag-only modifications:

For way["highway"][~"tiger:"~".*"] in {{geocodeArea:Seattle}}

Removed:

"tiger:cfcc" | 10884 objects
"tiger:county" | 10895 objects
"tiger:name_base" | 10687 objects
"tiger:name_base_1" | 175 objects
"tiger:name_direction_prefix" | 4485 objects
"tiger:name_direction_prefix_1" | 5 objects
"tiger:name_direction_suffix" | 5129 objects
"tiger:name_direction_suffix_1" | 14 objects
"tiger:name_type" | 9967 objects
"tiger:name_type_1" | 33 objects
"tiger:reviewed" | 3014 objects
"tiger:separated" | 2 objects
"tiger:source" | 2 objects
"tiger:tlid" | 2 objects
"tiger:upload_uuid" | 1 objects
"tiger:zip_right" | 3 objects
"source"="tiger_import_dch_v0.6_20070830" | 4 objects
"source"="TIGER;Yahoo! aerial imagery" | 11 objects
"source"="Yahoo,TIGER" | 16 objects
"source"="Yahoo;TIGER;USGS Large Scale Imagery" | 9 objects