piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
JBible92 (2026-02-27 11:23:51+00:00): Hi there. We were given guidance from the Derbion Shopping Centre that this was incorrectly named! 

I did make them aware that as a community map, if deemed incorrect that this may be altered. 

To play devils advocate, on Google they refer to the area around the Bus Station as the "Cock Pitt"... and the area I have updated as Morledge. So my evidence for updating was based on those two factors.
trigpoint (2026-02-27 18:02:08+00:00): Hello JBible92
Phil from The Data Working Group here. For the avoidance of doubt we cannot use Google Maps as a source in OSM, not to check, verify or justify an edit.
The correct nane  is what is on the sign, not what someone has told you. If you are being guided as you appear to be then please ensure that you are following https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

Cheers Phil
JBible92 (2026-03-02 09:07:42+00:00): Hi trigpoint (Phil)
Please revert my changes, and apologies for the inconveniences.

I was incorrectly guided by local knowledge from the shopping centre next door which at the time I felt was sufficient source evidence. The devils advocate comment around Google is irrelevant on my behalf, and I retract that previous statement as evidence.

In future if guided externally, I will use the link provided to process questionable changes.

Many thanks
Aethonatic (2026-03-06 09:59:24+00:00): I've gone ahead and reverted these changes for you. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179436479
trigpoint (2026-03-06 11:28:16+00:00): Thank you
NorthCrab_upload (2026-03-01 05:22:51+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13603137244

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
BCNorwich (2026-03-03 06:21:29+00:00): Hi, The building POI is within an existing building, thus duplicating a feature. I've removed i,t placing the new tags on the existing building.

Regards Bernard.
AbinayaSivakumar (2026-03-03 07:00:02+00:00): Hi Bernard,
Thank you for correcting it and explaining. I understand now about avoiding duplicate buildings. I’ll be more careful to check existing features before adding new ones.
Regards,
Abinaya
NeisBot (2026-02-26 17:00:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 10 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/972439878 v2 | 4 crossings
https://osm.org/way/972439879 v1 | 3 crossings
https://osm.org/way/972439882 v2 | 3 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/9000212204 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179093502
NeisReview (2026-03-06 17:33:18+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/179105560
NorthCrab_upload (2026-03-01 05:22:55+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13603139902

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-03-01 05:22:47+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2879720544

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
AndyB_66 (2026-02-26 21:31:04+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
NorthCrab_upload (2026-03-01 05:22:49+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13603128491

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NeisBot (2026-02-26 17:15:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13603151941 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Plumbing business"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-06 17:33:16+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179457307
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-19 12:52:30+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with advertising/malformed tags and source=* of Google Maps, which is not allowed by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ), in changeset 184314737

https://osm.org/changeset/184314737
NorthCrab_upload (2026-03-01 05:22:58+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13603151512

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-03-01 05:23:00+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13603165522

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
dmjab13 (2026-02-26 21:43:37+00:00): why does this changeset span so wide
pkoby (2026-02-26 21:57:14+00:00): I added a tag for name pronunciation to the Schuylkill River relation. The changeset covers the whole river.
Comino (2026-02-27 08:24:53+00:00): Hi,

In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes".

Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag !
Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead.

For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Merchants#tagging-guidance
and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bitcoin

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
BTC Map
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Comino
JuanElDemografo (2026-03-10 03:33:34+00:00): Hi after a recent discussion on wiki, we decided to change the camera:power=* tagging to the preexisting tagging electricity=*. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dsurveillance for the specifics.
cronoser (2026-03-12 15:13:45+00:00): Hola, no es necesario poner información en cualquier cosa del mapa, la línea de alta velocidad ya estaba marcada. revertido el conjunto de cambios en https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179762690
AndyB_66 (2026-02-26 21:30:03+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
AndyB_66 (2026-02-26 21:26:13+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
rempshaener (2026-02-26 19:31:04+00:00): Hallo,
finde ich gut ;-)
Ich vermute, du hast den Review-Haken versehentlich gesetzt.
VG
Znaika (2026-02-26 19:39:34+00:00): Hallo.  Ha, es ist mir wieder irgendwie passiert. Danke. VG
bartgron (2026-04-26 17:43:36+00:00): Witaj, znak "ustąp pierwszeństwa" na ulicy Mostowej, wyjazd w ulicę Kielecką, był dobrze dodany, niepotrzebnie go przesunąłeś. Znaki te oraz znaki STOP dodajemy na linii zatrzymania lub, w przypadku jej braku, przy samym skrzyżowaniu.
Pozdrawiam
pebepebe (2026-04-27 05:38:39+00:00): Cześć. OK, dzięki za info.
NeisBot (2026-02-26 18:16:12+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your changesets and noticed that the cumulative count of your recent edits (2 changesets) shows that 350 of your last 425 changes were deletions. This is quite an unusual proportion, so I wanted to check with you.

Could you please confirm whether these deletions were intentional or if they may have occurred by mistake?

#DeletionsCheck #Cumulative
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?uid=23516359
Martin Kra (2026-02-26 19:50:17+00:00): Dear Neisbot,
it was intentionally. In the area I was mapping I found about 20 round builings (each with about a dozen white"nodes"?) which have already been mapped twice (i.e. with a 100% or close to 100% overlap). I deleted the redundant ones. IMO no information has been lost.
pitscheplatsch (2026-02-26 19:57:48+00:00): Thanks for your reply.
NeisBot (2026-02-26 18:18:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 8 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/432735478 v2 | 5 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/4316805621 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179097847
9_tab (2026-02-27 11:26:55+00:00): How does https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1483493772 fit in?
silversurfer83 (2026-02-27 17:06:37+00:00): the buildings are of poor qualtiy and there are dragged nodes. I decided to revert.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179097847
pitscheplatsch (2026-02-27 17:57:38+00:00): Thanks @silversurfer83

Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179140997
notmyproblem1 (2026-03-03 18:13:20+00:00): Isn't this like a world changeset?
George Sears (2026-02-27 08:36:17+00:00): Buongiorno, ha aggiunto questo punto con solo il nome ma senza specificare di che tipo di attività o cosa sia, dal nome suppongo un parrucchiere però avrei bisogno di una sua conferma. Può anche specificare se il target clienti è specifico a uomini o donne, ed aggiungere l'indirizzo completo. Se vuole condivida tutte le informazioni qui in risposta a questo commento e me ne occupo io di aggiungerle, stessa cosa per l'altro punto che ha aggiunto in Via Nigri
C'est chic hairbeauty (2026-03-03 08:06:58+00:00): Buongiorno, mi scusi.il mio è un parrucchiere uomo/donna in Corso Umberto I 103 Bisceglie solo in questo punto.
Se per cortesia può togliere l'altro punto in Via Nigro perché ho sbagliato grazie aspetto conferma
NeisBot (2026-02-26 18:21:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 64 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/660018992 v2 | 41 crossings
https://osm.org/way/343738669 v13 | 20 crossings
https://osm.org/way/660018993 v5 | 3 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/6032373944 v6
https://osm.org/node/9499551702 v3

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179098121
NeisReview (2026-03-07 05:33:24+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/179192675
NeisBot (2026-02-26 18:24:41+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 26 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1120688796 v3 | 10 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1120688795 v2 | 7 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1120689078 v2 | 3 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/10250028944 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179098308
NeisReview (2026-03-07 05:33:25+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/179194279
https://osm.org/changeset/179194287
Szymson (2026-02-26 18:40:29+00:00): Na jakiej podstawie są dodawane te wszystkie wzniesienia? Jakie jest źródło lokalizacji i wysokości?
Kazik_N (2026-02-27 10:49:09+00:00): Przepraszam za brak opisu źródła. Zacznę je dodawać. W tym przypadku źródłem lokalizacji i wysokości była to Mapa topo 1:10 000 ukł. 65. https://mapy.geoportal.gov.pl/imap/Imgp_2.html?locale=pl&gui=new&sessionID=2F8EBC60-B103-48EC-9845-D47334926AA0   Zaokrągliłem wysokość do 1 miejsca po przecinku. W pozostałych przypadkach źródłem  był najczęściej bezpośredni odczyt wysokości z NMT wytworzonego z LiDAR w aktualnie obowiązującym układzie wysokościowym evrf2007, stąd możliwe drobne różnice względem dawnego układu z Kronsztad utrwalonego na rastrowych mapach topo. Lokalizację ustalam z "dynamicznej hipsometrii" w geoportalu (zawężenie obszaru poszukiwań) https://mapy.geoportal.gov.pl/imap/Imgp_2.html?locale=pl&gui=new&sessionID=9EA78C6F-9B57-40FB-8728-D29AAFC7996B  a następnie ręcznym próbkowaniu NMT najwyższego piksela
NeisBot (2026-02-26 18:51:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 11 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1483506444 v1 | 5 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179099344
NeisReview (2026-03-07 05:33:25+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/179416715
NeisBot (2026-02-26 18:57:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 34 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/24576407 v12 | 7 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1307480203 v1 | 7 crossings
https://osm.org/way/24779273 v5 | 5 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/269285247 v4
https://osm.org/node/269250673 v4

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179099661
NeisReview (2026-03-07 05:33:25+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/179196340
https://osm.org/changeset/179457637
santamariense (2026-03-15 18:34:16+00:00): Olá Dengue Barra Mansa,

Existem diversas fontes citando a existência do bairro 1º de Maio.

Onde ele deveria constar e não consta para se chegar à conclusão de que ele não existe?

Bons mapeamentos,
user_23759405 (2026-03-16 11:50:05+00:00): Bom dia.

Não se o OpenStreetMaps é mais baseado em relato popular ou dado oficial, mas o mapa que sigo pra fazer mapeamento de bairros aqui em Barra Mansa - RJ é esse aqui do link: https://portaltransparencia.barramansa.rj.gov.br/download/7-mapa-de-abairramento-2025/

Resumidamente seria por esse motivo.

Agradeço a atenção, e se não quiserem considerar não tem problema.
santamariense (2026-03-16 15:25:10+00:00): Obrigado pelas informações.

Na verdade, no OSM acaba tendo ambos. As delimitações costumam vir de fontes oficiais, e a melhor fonte de delimitação de bairros é certamente o próprio município.

O usuário que mapeou a delimitação antes também se baseou em mapa da prefeitura. Talvez este bairro tenha constado como oficial por algum tempo e depois tenha sido incorporado a outro ou tenha mudado de nome. Isso acontece. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/42070168

Se não consta mais como bairro oficial, porém é um bairro de uso popular, ou mesmo tenha algum registro, cabe ainda mapear como sub-bairro, adicionando um ponto  place=neighbourhood

Conclui-se que você está trazendo atualizações. E isso é muito importante.

Embora você tenha tirado o nome do ponto, o bairro em si não deixou de existir no mapa. Aqui está ele: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6578300 . É preciso ter uma certa experiência para poder fazer os devidos ajustes. Mas com o tempo você pega o jeito.

Aqui você tem a delimitação de bairros que está no OSM. Com ela você consegue estimar o que precisa ser revisado. https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2min

O mapeador que fez a versão anterior continua ativo no OSM; vou chamá-lo/a para ver se tem interesse em ver isso contigo.

Bons mapeamentos.

santamariense
user_23759405 (2026-03-17 12:18:28+00:00): Entendi, agradeço a orientação. Tem coisas que no próprio mapa da prefeitura está desatualizado, eles devem ter se baseado em algum outro mais antigo de repente. Nesse caso do bairro, deve ser alguma sublocalidade do bairro 9 de Abril, que é oficial.
Vou parar de enviar emails por aqui pois ele é do setor em que trabalho, e acabei sugerindo edições por ele sem perceber.
Sobre o assunto das vias terciárias numa outra edição minha: desconsidere minha sugestão, o que eu enviei não faz sentido nenhum.

Obrigado!
santamariense (2026-03-15 18:43:45+00:00): Olá Dengue Barra Mansa,

O que são vias terciárias e quais variáveis você analisou para chegar à conclusão de que não são terciárias?

Bons mapeamentos.
MappingMore (2026-03-01 03:40:40+00:00):  Revert of 179099292
Rainero (2026-03-12 17:00:14+00:00): Revert mit changeset/179767413
(unzulässige Quelle)
Frans S (2026-02-27 16:13:33+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179100446
NeisBot (2026-02-26 19:21:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 35 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/229968101 v2 | 5 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1062334848 v4 | 5 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1167538976 v3 | 5 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/267194702 v12

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179100575
NeisReview (2026-03-07 05:33:26+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/179394534
IvaKraljić (2026-02-27 20:53:06+00:00): The unnecessarily created node has since been deleted in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179102054. #OptimoRoute
Sylvain M (2026-05-24 17:41:44+00:00): According to this iNaturalist Observation (https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/147269577) this tree is Ceiba pentandra, without any doubt.
Who says it is Adansonia digitata ?
Frans S (2026-02-27 16:09:24+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 
Just a remark. Highways in rural areas are not to be tagged as residential. Use "unclassified" instead.
Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179100924
pitscheplatsch (2026-02-27 12:23:11+00:00): Hello,

I noticed that you changed name:es from “Andorra la Vieja” to “Andorra la Vella.”

Could you please clarify the reason for this change? As far as I understand, name:es should reflect the Spanish-language name, and “Andorra la Vieja” has traditionally been the Spanish exonym.

If you have sources showing that “Andorra la Vella” is now preferred in Spanish usage, I’d be interested to see them.

Thanks in advance for the clarification.

https://osm.mapki.com/history/node/58957648
pitscheplatsch (2026-02-27 13:01:00+00:00): I used at least the wiki-page here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andorra_la_Vella
sommallorqui (2026-02-28 00:00:14+00:00): According to the National Geographic Institute, the name is "Andorra la Vella"

https://www.ign.es/iberpix/visor/
IvaKraljić (2026-02-27 20:47:09+00:00): The unnecessary source:hgv has since been deleted in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179149258. #OptimoRoute
Henry572 (2026-03-15 17:15:41+00:00): Hallo Amine,

Die Paulshöfe sind doch - soweit ich weiß - nur die Fläche https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/810858748. Die Paulsmühle ist schon als https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/666152970 eingetragen. Ich glaube dann braucht man an diesem Wohngebiet hier nicht noch einen Namen.

Viele Grüße,
Hendrik
AmineAusAlbuquerque (2026-03-16 10:33:15+00:00): Hi Hendrik,

einverstanden :) Du hast mehr Erfahrung in OSM als ich. Für die Zukunft weiß ich dann bescheid 

Grüße zurück

Amine