piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
GVitalik (2024-05-24 06:27:06+00:00): Добрый день,
спасибо за информацию, когда искал аптеку psp не нашел её в organic maps, поэтому добавил, когда зашел внутрь.
Frans S (2024-07-01 09:30:48+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
A: Buildings not accurate drawn.

B: Overlapping buildings

C: Clustered Buildings.

D: Connected nodes to other buildings.

E: Buildings not squared.

H: Incorporated the yard or clearing.

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151689929
ivanbranco (2024-08-23 16:16:47+00:00): Ciao Franz 1996,

hai fuso due elementi:
1. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2446765304/history
2. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8997115618/history

ma ora hanno un doppio valore di natural e name.
Riesci a sistemare il name? 

natural=mountain_pass;saddle si puó sistemare con natural=saddle + mountain_pass=yes. Ma "mountain_pass=yes marks the highest point of a mountain road", quindi secondo me andrebbe aggiunto come nodo della highway.
richlv (2024-05-23 08:40:22+00:00): Sveiki, liels paldies par burvīgajiem kartes papildinājumiem.

Šim veikalam (?) Hellmap mazliet precizēja tipu.
Tā kā šai ēkai laikam nav piešķirta oficiāla adrese, to pagaidām noņēmu.

Un, ja vēl nav bijusi iespēja pievienoties, laipni aicinām Latvijas OSM kopienas čatā, https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com .
BlueButterfly (2024-06-05 19:24:41+00:00): Hello samuelzammit,

I wanted to bring a few things to your attention regarding your edits in Malta. In particular, it looks like you may have mistakenly deleted a section of trunk highway (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/514527737) but I believe the intention was to remove an old bus stop node. I also noticed that you changed the classification of a highway segment from highway=tertiary to highway=primary (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29286673) resulting in a short segment of primary highway which is disconnected from the greater primary network. Primary highways typically link larger towns while tertiary highways are typically used to link smaller towns and villages (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway#Roads). 

I have already updated these areas, but thought it might be helpful to point this out as you seem to be a new member of the OSM community. You might also find https://learnosm.org/ useful, as it has a lot of great editing tips. The country wiki page for Malta also has some helpful policy that is specific to Malta (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Malta). 
Hopefully these resources can be of help to you, and I hope you have a wonderful day!
WoodWoseWulf (2024-05-22 21:02:01+00:00): I've refined the shape of this beach area so it's not just a polygon drawn over the whole water area - nice addition to the map though!
eggie (2024-05-22 19:59:52+00:00): Dag 5ajm,
Wel heel erg uitgebreid. 
Wat is het verschil tussen een bike en een bicycle?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:service:bicycle:*

Wellicht website aanpassen naar https://cc33.nl

MVG
eggie
5ajm1i7816dlf56ew (2024-05-23 08:50:10+00:00): Hi Eggie, dank voor de review! Heb het aangepast op basis van je feedback.
Константин Гам (2024-06-26 08:42:06+00:00): Пожалуйста не вносите POI если вам ЛЕНЬ внести нормальное название!
DFF24 заведение известное лишь вам, а бренд и наименование у заведения другие, и 24 в них не присутствует! Времени работы место в соотв. поле
Anton Khorev (2024-06-27 18:01:56+00:00): Да, мне было лень проверять Duty Free Flowers это, или что-то другое.

Объявления видного на панорамах там не было, когда я проверял:
https://yandex.ru/maps/2/saint-petersburg/?l=stv%2Csta&ll=30.318754%2C59.904405&panorama%5Bdirection%5D=279.987472%2C-15.622738&panorama%5Bfull%5D=true&panorama%5Bpoint%5D=30.318114%2C59.904432&panorama%5Bspan%5D=35.714423%2C15.000000&z=19.52

Спасибо за совет не вводить, но я им пожалуй не воспользуюсь.
MxxCon (2024-05-26 04:39:59+00:00): Hello.
Why do you intentionally make crosswalks crooked?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151690383
NeisBot (2024-05-22 18:16:03+00:00): Hi MPH65, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1285722113

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
WoodWoseWulf (2024-05-22 20:54:39+00:00): Hello MPH65,
An area such as this surrounding a swimming pool is not a beach.
If you're chasing Wiglett, it might be worth taking a day trip out to Apollo Beach Nature Park which appears to be your closest mapped beach.
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-23 05:39:10+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/151696632
Frans S (2024-06-08 08:18:00+00:00): Hello. See my comment on another changeset.
I noticed that you added a layer at some buildings. Why ? They are build on the ground. Not above. 
When it is done to hide an error because you crossed a road ( Impossible, roads don't go through houses) Just move the nodes of the road to the correct position.
And don't forget to square each rectangular building.
Best regards
kenken234 (2024-05-22 18:23:20+00:00): Also adjusted alignment of underground water pipeline along Bukit Timah/Holland based on Singapore Landlot and ESRI imagery
Frans S (2024-06-12 10:43:17+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Clustered buildings.
Buildings not squared.

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151691093
Frans S (2024-07-01 09:06:53+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
A: Buildings not accurate drawn.
B: Overlapping Buildings.
C: clustered buildings
D: Connected nodes to other buildings
E: Buildings not squared.
H: Included the yard in a mapping.

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151691188
Frans S (2024-05-31 15:13:31+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.

This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit,

For all your changesets on this project.
Very inaccurate mappings.
Connected buildings with their nodes
Connected nodes to other features
Buildings not squared.
Clustered buildings to 1 mapped building.
Your mapping quality is that bad that I consider removing all your mappings. It cost more time to correct them rather than map them from scratch.

Quality prevails above quantity !!


Best regards, and please improve your mapping skills before continue mapping,
Frans S
Frans S (2024-06-01 09:29:38+00:00): Mappings removed due to poor mapping quality.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151691972
miluethi (2024-05-25 13:47:09+00:00): Van,
There a buildings shapes far bigger than the satellite imagery. Please narrow down the shapes.
Thanks
Lokai (2024-05-23 18:29:30+00:00): Hallo,

sie haben auf den letzten CS Kommentar nicht geantwortet.

Bei diesem CS habe ich den angeblichen cycleway in Landstuhl nach path geändert. Die Beschilderung ist Zeichen 240. Bitte für solche Wege highway=path benutzen, das ist gängige Praxis. path bedetutet allgemeiner Weg. Zudem fehlte segregated=no.

Gruß
L
Frans S (2024-07-01 10:24:18+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please do not connect nodes of building to each other.
Solve the issues shown by the issue triangle before you upload your work,
When you map a building, please map it in 1 go. 
Best regards
pyram (2024-05-24 14:24:48+00:00): Hallo,

wegen Deiner Eintragungen von ehemaligen Bahntrassen möchte ich Dich zur Diskussion in https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/open-railway-map-route-in-josm-nicht-editierbar-nicht-angezeigt/109022/332 einladen. Oder zumindest solltest Du diese Diskussion kennen ;-)

Gruß
pyram
Frans S (2024-07-02 15:12:34+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
A: Buildings not accurate drawn.
B: overlapping buildings.
D: Connected many nodes to other buildings and highways.
E: Buildings not squared.

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151692607
eggie (2024-06-07 20:15:57+00:00): Waneer de voorgaande mapper highway=path heeft getagd zou dat best eens correct kunnen zijn. Waarom maak je overal steeds footway van?
Het is werk van ervaren mappers.
Je edits 
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=151692662
MVG
eggie
canfe (2024-05-23 08:57:11+00:00): Le varie regioni sarebbe meglio identificarle come nodi singoli così compare anche l'icona...
Per i vari sentieri mappati: ma DAVVERO si chiamano così? O è solo dove portano? In definitiva c'è una fonte ufficiale dei vari nomi che hai messo?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151692749
Franz 1996 (2024-05-23 11:48:00+00:00): Quelli con numerazione ufficiale Cai che ho sistemato perché errati di tracciato, ho messo la numerazione come da progetti.
Quelli senza numerazione ho riportato dove portano.
Riguardo alla fonte ufficiale, certamente, oltre che esser dove abito e ci lavoro lo si può rilevare tranquillamente se non sei pratico delle zone, anche dalle carte tecniche, piuttosto che riscontrando le igm(oltreché 
Viverci,lo faccio per lavoro).
Poi quelli minori poco tracciati se vedi li ho metto come "tracce informali" con cattiva visibilità.
Sei anche tu qui della valle?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151692749
Franz 1996 (2024-05-23 11:49:24+00:00): Per i nodi, stavo proprio provando infatti, perché ho notato infatti che non si vedono, o si vedono solo in base a che mappa open apri, infatti oggi pomeriggio volevo sistemarli
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151692749
canfe (2024-05-23 14:54:45+00:00): E che le IGM non si possono copiare.
Se leggi sulla wiki sotto "name" spiega che deve essere ufficiale.
Infine: non si mappa per il rendering.
Il fatto che metta una iconcina è solo che la "zona", in genre, non è ben definità. Non è come per i comuni che ci sono dei confini, per le "località" non ci sono.
Franz 1996 (2024-05-23 15:17:17+00:00): Esatto, sulle tecniche comunali io che le vedo e le uso anche per lavoro le vedo perché ci son riportati. Quindi sono ufficiali. Però per chi non ne ha l'accesso può verificare anche dalle igm(non sto dicendo di copiare dalle igm), dato che molti nomi si ritrovano anche lì.
Io i sentieri che metto o raddrizzo è tutta roba tracciata da me col gps dove conosco.
Sul fatto dei punti ho provato come dicevi e effettivamente è meglio, perché sto caricando dei sentieri anche nel parco, e ho inserito una vecchia miniera, ma se non fai così effettivamente dalla carta poi non la vedi..
Oggi ho spostato anche la miniera rambaisa(sopra il gias nuovo fontane vicino a casa mia) che l'avevano messa 200m spostata..
Altri sentieri tipo il ferreri-rivero nella gura, anche passo delle lose, li ho messi come tracce informali e non "sentieri"(per me che conosco, li becco al volo, ma se non conosci triboli anche a trovare i bolli rossi e bianchi).
canfe (2024-05-23 16:06:19+00:00): 1) il fatto che siano carte tecnica comunali ufficiali non vuol dire che abbiano una licenza d'uso che permette di copiarli.
2) se un sentiero è "informal" come fa ad avere un nome?
aceman444 (2024-10-06 21:16:16+00:00): Preco je cesta https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1285741021 oznacena ako polna cesta s travnatym povrchom a uplne rovnako vyzerajuca cesta od nej na zapad (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1285741020) je chodnik s okruhlymi dlazobnymi kamenmi? A naozaj su to dlazobne kamene? Obe vyzeraju len ako vyjazdene stopy (teda ak su to vobec cesty, kedze sa k nim neda dostat, naokolo k nim vedu len chodniky).
Miroslav Durian (2024-10-07 05:45:07+00:00): Pretoze to tak je. Je to siroky chodnik s okruhlymi dlazobnymi kamenmi, ktory ma v strede vyzadenu cestu v trave dvojstopovymi vozidlami. Keby som to neoveril fyzicky na mieste, nedam do popisu source=survey.
Miroslav Durian (2024-10-07 05:45:34+00:00): Dakujem za upozornenie.
Miroslav Durian (2024-10-07 05:52:45+00:00): Co sa tyka nazvu obce, rozumiem, no nazvy budov su naozaj Kotolna a Dielna. Dokonca je to na nich priamo napisane velkym pismom.
aceman444 (2026-06-08 16:55:16+00:00): Dakujem za odpovede (aj ked niektore asi patria do inej sady zmien.

K tej ceste pre dvojstope vozidla, suhlasim, ze tak vyzera. Ide ale o to, ze v OSM cesty znacime podla vyznamu/pouzitia, nie podla toho ako vyzeraju (napr. siroku cestu pre pesich/pesiu zonu tiez neoznacite ako dialnicu, hoci by aj mala potrebnu sirku 24 metrov).
Zalezi teda, ci tam naozaj nieco jazdi, resp. ma/smie jazdit (napr. pracovne vozidla zamestnancov). Lebo ak nie, ak tam chodia len chodci, potom to ako polna cesta nema zmysel. Ak ano, tiez je otazka ako sa na tu cestu tie vozidla dostanu? Po chodnikoch?
Taktiez to neodpoveda na moju otazku, preco 2 identicky vyzerajuce useky cesty su znacene jeden ako chodnik a druhy ako polna cesta.
Frans S (2024-06-02 10:35:34+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Rather inaccurate mapped.
Mapped buildings including surrounding yard.
Buildings not squared.
CLustered buildings.

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151693175
4004 (2024-05-25 22:28:03+00:00): здравствуйте, спасибо за правку. 
в осм не рекоммендуется рисование полос как отдельных дорог, если только их не разделяет физический разделитель.
в этом случае такое спагетти из дорог вряд ли облегчит навигацию, но дело вкуса.
единственное, что вы кажется упустили, это запреты - например я не думаю, что с поворотной полосы можно развернуться и тп? это надо отмечать, выбрав точку пересечения дорог
1816fixed (2024-05-26 18:06:00+00:00): Спасибо за ремарку, отдельные полосы можно убрать, учту на будущее
canfe (2025-04-22 17:45:26+00:00): Hai dato un nome ad un pascolo, ma la località era già stata mappata correttamente come locality con nome Frassa nel 2019.
Tolto il doppione.
Il pascolo esiste effettivamente? vedo parecchi alberi dalle immagini aeree. Forse volevi solo aggiungere la località?
DaveTO (2024-05-22 20:26:27+00:00): Thank you, Jarek. This makes a lot of sense.
bxl-forever (2024-05-22 19:52:41+00:00): Hello,

Was the removal of tags here—and also on all the countries which you decided to edit—discussed somewhere?  It always looks very suspicious when a new user starts removing established tags.  And I am afraid that by doing so you are making life of everyone harder.

For the record, queries on countries always use multiple tags, namely boundary=administrative + admin_level=2 + possibly an ISO code.

But this one is a boundary=land_area relation, it is treated differently and it does not harm having the ISO code of the country set here too.
thefrankbraun (2024-05-22 20:08:17+00:00): Hi,

I'm sorry if this was the wrong way to go about things, I'm indeed new here. What would be the best place to discuss this?

What I'm trying to achieve is to go from an ISO-3166-1 code to a definite region for the country. It seems to me that an ISO-3166-1 code should lead to exactly one region which is why I removed the tag on this region.

So if I understand you correctly you suggest combining it with boundary=administrative + admin_level=2 to get the one definite region for a given ISO-3166-1 code? And then the same ISO-3166-1 code could be used on other regions for the country as well (like boundary=land_area ones).
bxl-forever (2024-05-22 20:23:36+00:00): OpenStreetMap has been around for almost 20 years and our data is used by a lot of people: researchers or geographers often run various type of queries.
Those tags were certainly introduced for a good reason.  And yes, indeed, there is no requirement that only one object contains the ISO-3166-1 code; the map has functioned fairly well with that, exactly because there is more than a single tag to identify an object.

The best way to discuss this is to start a topic on the community forum (https://community.openstreetmap.org/) explaining why you feel like we should delete all those tags, and see what people say about this idea.
thefrankbraun (2024-05-22 20:30:25+00:00): Thanks for the explanation and pointers, after browsing through your handbook it seems I made a classic newbie mistake :)

I'll work with the existing tag system and only change what are clearly mistakes or what's missing.
Langlaeufer (2025-02-15 19:57:57+00:00): Hallo Natura. Wie ist den die "Fahrradstraße" Kleine Fischerei genau beschildert?  Das Tagging ist derzeit widersprüchlich, weil in einer Fahrradstraße kein anderer Fahrzeugverkehr zugelassen ist würde das oneway=yes keinen Sinn ergeben.
Natura (2025-02-16 12:23:11+00:00): Das "genaue" und aktuelle Foto des Verkehrszeichens ist verlinkt. Lässt er sich nicht öffnen?
Langlaeufer (2025-02-17 08:52:30+00:00): Ah, hatte ich übersehen.
Ich passe das Tagging an.
Der südliche Teil ist weiterhin Einbahnstraße für alle?
Frans S (2024-06-11 13:22:44+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please do not tag (walled) yards as a building. 
Best regards
zorglubu (2024-05-25 19:47:03+00:00): Bonjour,

je me suis permis d'annuler cette modification concernant des attributs en usage depuis des années, sans discussion avec la communauté OSM.

Il est important avant de faire de telles modifications de demander l'avis des contributeurs plus expérimentés.
Merci.
thefabi (2024-06-22 08:48:25+00:00): Why did you change the number of lanes?. It is a Two-way road without marked lanes, but it has 1 lane in each direction. Similar to the fourth example: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lanes#Examples
Unbeatable101 (2024-05-22 19:29:46+00:00): *to river
silversurfer83 (2024-05-22 19:56:47+00:00): Sieht gut aus :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151694120
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-10 02:13:13+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164748082
NorthCrab_upload (2024-05-22 19:50:29+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.

"Huta":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1039554436

"Śniadówka":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1285755639

"Czołna":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1285755643

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2024-05-22 19:50:28+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2379399305
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1285755696

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
emersonveenstra (2024-05-24 10:50:59+00:00): Hi there,

Looks like you typoed the capacity value on several of the parking lots like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1285756393

Could you please go back and fix these? Thanks!
emersonveenstra (2024-05-24 10:51:32+00:00): sorry, parking spaces, not parking lots
Glassman (2024-05-25 18:05:41+00:00): I don't think you want cycleway. Cycleways are typically found in cities, paved next to a street. Either path or track seems more appropriate. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mountain_biking
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151694796