piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Supaplex030 (2023-09-20 09:54:42+00:00): Hallo hantech, danke sehr für das Testen und Aktualisieren der Straßenbrunnen :) Bei dem Brunnen in der Lübzer Straße/Melanchthonstraße (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9988226640) fehlt noch die Statusangabe – dort hast du nur ein aktuelles Datum eingetragen. Vermutlich ist der auch "ok"? :) Bei den anderen beiden von dir getesteten Brunnen hatte es der User "Thomas/Mr Pianoman" bereits eingetragen.

Vielen Dank und beste Grüße!
Alex
numbs (2024-04-30 23:42:52+00:00): Hi bohemio,
I have removed the separate cycleways added in this changeset.
Per OSM wiki, "Cycling infrastructure that is an inherent part of a road - particularly "cycle lanes" which are a part of the road - should usually not be tagged as a separate cycleway, but by adding the cycleway=* tag to an existing highway=* instead."
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=cycleway#When_not_to_use
PlayGuide (2026-01-23 12:54:45+00:00): Salut,
Sur node/2904725097 pourquoi avoir remplacé natural=tree par natural=peak ? L'arbre s'est fossilisé ? 😅
MxxCon (2023-09-20 01:44:11+00:00): If there's no kerb here, then...? 🤨
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141444263
punkpenguinprincess333 (2023-09-20 02:04:31+00:00): Whoopsie! Deleted the wrong ones :) thank you mxxcon!
Le_Viv_33 (2023-09-25 08:18:43+00:00): Bonjour,
Le projet Cap Garonne et la future piscine UCPA n'ont pas commencé et elles ne se situent pas ici. L'enveloppe future du bâti a déjà été cartographiée,  un peu plus au Nord.
Je me permets de corriger cela, bonne journée.
bxl-forever (2023-09-19 18:42:03+00:00): Hello,

All the bus stops seem to be already on the map here.  It looks like you are adding extra stops that serve no purpose, that are not linked to relations and with a strange naming scheme.

What are you trying to achieve exactly, please?
Olaf der Mapper (2023-09-19 22:16:59+00:00): Look at the bounding box of his changeset, I think he's trolling 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141480264

Olaf
Frans S (2023-09-19 10:39:26+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped.  Very precise!
Where clearly visible, add courtyards please.
This is how to map a building with courtyards.

 1   Draw the outer outline of the building as an area. Tag as a building
 2  Draw each of the inner courtyards/plazas as areas. Tag as needed, or not at all
 3  Hold 'SHIFT' and select all the areas
 4  Press 'C' to create a multipolygon with all the areas
Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141444572
Arflha (2024-03-27 11:24:49+00:00): Good morning,
Where did the source:geometry as with 1164690139 go? Disappeared.

What were the problems?
Were the buildings displayed correctly? Yes.
Were landuses displayed correctly? Yes.
Did it have source:geometry tags to allow other users to check out the work? Yes.

"They can also be useful to make the distinction between linear objects (e.g. a fence surrounding a property, tagged on the way) and the area inside (tagged on the multipolygon relation) without having to draw overlapping ways."
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon
Friendly_Ghost (2024-03-27 19:45:14+00:00): Hi Arflha, 

Thank you for having a detailed look at my edit. Sometimes mistakes happen, and in this case I mistook the source tag for something that was discardable, as is the case with some other source tags, especially for objects that were later reviewed by people. 

As for the multipolygons in general, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Editing_Standards_and_Conventions#Areas_are_closed_ways describes that areas are normally mapped as closed ways. The documentation on multipolygons describes all sorts of more complex cases like areas with holes in them, but this is just a simple area with no complications, so a closed way makes more sense.

Best regards,

Casper
LockOnGuy (2023-09-18 23:04:50+00:00): And improve and fix the routing of roads in the roundabout.
GinaroZ (2023-10-16 18:00:28+00:00): I've changed these to railway=construction btw
jmarchon (2023-09-20 03:07:41+00:00): Hello!
We usually don't map temporary closures on OSM. More info can be found here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_map_temporary_events_and_temporary_features
I've removed the closure.
MrMusAddict (2023-09-20 03:24:33+00:00): Per that wiki, "it should at least be expected to remain unchanged in the next few weeks when you map it." This is an ongoing fire, and mitigation currently has no set end date. The DOT uses the language "closed Mondays through Fridays 8-4", which implies this will be a multi week operation.
jmarchon (2023-09-20 04:49:21+00:00): I believe the general consensus is that edits should be accurate for at least 3-6 months. I don't think fires usually last that long.
MrMusAddict (2023-09-20 05:49:06+00:00): This particular fire has been ongoing for a month, and the clean-up and full re-opening of this highway is expected to take at least as long. Both the DOT for both Oregon and California are begging people to not follow their GPS apps. This stretch of highway is the only road from to the coast without a 4 hour detour, people unaware of the fire are trying to drive through, taking detours into active fire zones.
jmarchon (2023-09-20 15:35:18+00:00): I'm afraid GPS apps using OSM won't update in time anyway, so adding the closure here would do little good - it only makes the GPS apps inaccurate once they finally do update. But by that time, the closure is probably long gone.
jmarchon (2023-09-20 22:10:50+00:00): I stand corrected! It appears temporary closures are appropriate to add to OSM, but only by using the proper conditional restrictions.
Do you have an estimate for when the roads will be open again? If so, I could add the closure back again. Or you can, if you wish.
Happy mapping!
quicky (2023-10-19 12:40:10+00:00): Salut, l'occupation de ce terrain par les gens du voyage n a rien d'officiel.
De ce que je comprends le halting_site est destinée aux aires d accueil officiel
rhtb0 (2023-09-19 07:38:39+00:00): 16:00시가 아닌 21:00에 개통합니다.
rhtb0 (2023-09-19 07:55:15+00:00): 수도권제2순환고속도로 시화MTV 구간(남안산-시화) 개통정보도 선반영 바랍니다(09/25 개통).
rhtb0 (2023-09-20 07:20:00+00:00): 새로 개통한 도로는 start_date=2020n-0n-0n를 넣어주시고, 관계도 확인해 주시면 감사하겠습니다.
https://its.go.kr/ its 국가교통정보센터 사이트도 cctv를 확인하실 수 있습니다. 카카오맵에는 빠진 cctv가 몇개 있습니다.
user_5359 (2023-09-19 16:03:59+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/11201123271. What is the mean of the tags
addr:RU:egrn = обл. Кировская р. Верхнекамский г. Кирс ул. Нижняя д. 14
addr:RU:egrn_type = PARCEL
addr:RU:extracted_name = Нижняя д. 14
addr:RU:extracted_type = улица
addr:RU:parsed_housenumber = 14
Kirov01243 (2023-09-19 16:17:37+00:00): Good afternoon. The package right is not made completely. I will fix and remove personal tags in the near future.
user_5359 (2023-09-19 16:32:14+00:00): I assume that the country codes RU are not part of the destination keys, or?
Kirov01243 (2023-09-19 16:37:50+00:00): Не являются. Оставил их на время, чтобы видно было добавленные здания. Скоро исправлю и уберу лишние ключи.
Firefishy (2023-09-18 23:46:25+00:00): Removed by informal request from NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service.
mrpulley (2024-02-13 12:15:14+00:00): Partial reversion done, as per discussion on talk-au mailing list. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147406352
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2023-09-19 11:39:24+00:00): This bicycle lane should be tagged as lane. A track would mean a physicial separation other than flex bollards and/or paint (and is usually mapped separately instead). There is already a cycleway:separation tag specifying that the cycleway is separated by a buffer. Thanks!
gcamp (2023-09-21 14:33:12+00:00): I tried contacting you on the OSM slack, but since there's no response I'm going to respond here too. 

We talked about this already in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121580172 and we agreed on track. What changed?
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2023-09-21 18:28:07+00:00): I think the cycleway:separation is the tag to use here instead of changing to track, but I will accept it. In the last month, they added concrete separations at some intersections so I guess it becomes like the REV which is mapped separately. So in the future I suggest mapping these separately like the REV. Would it be correct? I still think cycleway=track should be temporary and replaced by a separated way as soon as possible if there is a physical separation. It is like sidewalk=both;left;right, which should be replaced by sidewalk:both/left/right=separate with the sidewalks mapped separately as soon as someone has the time to do it.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2023-09-21 18:28:45+00:00): I rarely go on Slack, so sorry for not having seen your messages ;-)
user_5359 (2023-09-19 16:22:39+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-09-19 00:40:19+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11201191778

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
CurlingMan13 (2023-09-19 19:18:29+00:00): What's the reason for not adding the cartpath bridges over the water?  Specifically the segment by Piper Road?
user_5359 (2023-09-19 16:18:14+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/11201158911, http://www.osm.org/node/349333076. What is the mean of the tag 
de:08236:2203:0:1 = de:08236:2203:0:2
?
citrula (2023-09-20 01:14:41+00:00): Where can I read about the "Atlantic Way Trail" you describe? Are these route relations something related to that or are they defined elsewhere?
Pikachu25 (2023-09-20 19:59:53+00:00): I have an official website, but it only has the Massachusetts, Connecticut and Virginia segments. There are segments under development as far as South Africa, but these distant segments can only be found via Facebook. With the exception of New Hampshire, all the Atlantic Way Trail segments I have mapped this time are official segments that range from the early review stage to the construction stage. South Carolina and North Carolina are not mapped even though they are in the review stage because the segments under review do not currently exist. Virginia is a special case as well, it is not mapped because most of the segments currently on the website are on-road, and the few off-road pieces have either not been started or, in the case of Pocahontas State Park, on hold. Within the coming weeks, I will be adding the off-road segments of The Atlantic Way between Greenwich and Westport in   Connecticut, which is already on the official website, and deleting the segments in New Hampshire and most of Maine, which have not been started, to more accurately match the official website. The link for the official website can be found here: https://johnlnewstead1.wixsite.com/lb1658609362366
citrula (2023-09-21 15:44:47+00:00): Are there other people involved or is a project you are undertaking alone? Do people use or refer to this route? I'm not sure that this is appropriate for OSM as it stands currently.
citrula (2023-09-21 15:44:48+00:00): Are there other people involved or is a project you are undertaking alone? Do people use or refer to this route? I'm not sure that this is appropriate for OSM as it stands currently.
Pikachu25 (2023-09-21 19:06:42+00:00): Only the segments in Plymouth and Kingston, Massachusetts are involved in the project and refer to it as The Atlantic Way, if that is what you are asking. In addition, Plymouth is the only one that has passed the planning stage and has an exact route that is ready for physical marking, which should start in October and run all the way to June 2025. All of this information has been conveyed via email and on-site visits, both of which are hard to show for varying reasons. If you ask Diane G Peck from the Plymouth Open Space Committee, she can confirm that a project is in the works there.
gscholz (2024-03-05 08:06:54+00:00): Hi johnmogi,
your recent edit have left behind a huge amount of destroyed boundary relations:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-50.83606&lat=-29.39117&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=141446005

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-09-22 16:03:45+00:00): revertido. voce deletou essa via: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/501883310#map=19/-23.98477/-46.29240&layers=N
erickdeoliveiraleal (2024-02-04 14:42:14+00:00): voce esta adicionando vias residenciais para delimitar propriedades privadas, isso é um uso incorreto para ruas residenciais.
CurlingMan13 (2023-09-19 19:36:41+00:00): Do not partially overlap areas.  I have gone through and fixed this one along with several other changesets of yours.  Please pay more attention in the future.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141447494
GOwin (2023-09-19 06:27:46+00:00): Thank you for your edit, and helping improve the local map. 🥳

When adding names, you can avoid redundant entries by using other namespaces like short_name, alt_name, etc, to capture additional details.

You can read more about that from the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names

By the way, can you confirm that this road is really a one way road? It looks odd since there's no direct route to the main road, with that one way restriction.
CurlingMan13 (2023-09-19 19:39:28+00:00): I have made multiple comments on changesets regarding the partial overlap of areas (specifically the putting green and fairway), but you have not heeded the advice or responded to the changeset comments.

Previous changeset comment identifying similar issue(s): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141233975
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141447876
tastrax (2023-09-19 11:40:47+00:00): It would be appreciated if you could write meaningful changeset comments so we can all quickly tell what you have edited. Cheers
silversurfer83 (2023-09-19 14:01:00+00:00): There already was a nice entry for the motorcycle shop so I removed this one in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141471041
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141448346
NieWnen (2023-09-19 17:29:56+00:00): Dzięki za zmiany w Kaniach. Drobna uwaga, usunąłem tę ścieżkę na Karolińskiej do Otrębus. Była już oznaczona obok i wyszedł duplikat.
Warin61 (2024-01-14 04:23:37+00:00): Sport = soccer.. 
Changed to building grandstand and added pitches .. as per Ersi ..

See what you think..
Mahdi Nameghi (2023-09-19 05:36:57+00:00): سلام
بر چه مبنایی نام این بلوار را شکسپیر گذاشته اید؟
Karthoo (2023-09-20 11:28:59+00:00): سلام
اشتباه بود ، نام در واقع بلوار ششپیر
Tayvick (2023-09-23 22:44:48+00:00): Toledo*
user_5359 (2023-09-21 16:00:21+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please use only the key building (not building1).
D=SW (2023-09-19 07:14:36+00:00): السلام عليكم لماذا قمت بتغيير ونقل محطة وقود الى مكان خاص في خريطة عامة؟ الرجاء عدم اضافة معلومات خاصة
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-28 17:26:54+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11201590166/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
rhtb0 (2023-09-19 07:57:32+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11201570873
rhtb0 (2023-09-19 07:57:59+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:housenumber?uselang=ko
rhtb0 (2023-09-19 07:58:37+00:00): payment:lightning=yes
payment:onchain=no
pets_allowed=Pet Friendly
is unuse tag
balsoft (2023-09-19 17:41:36+00:00): The building tag seems to be invalid. Also, perhaps you mean name:de instead of namen:de.
HellMap (2023-09-21 18:37:58+00:00): Sveiki!

Es celiņu salaboju.
map per (2023-09-21 12:07:43+00:00): Hallo studioimnetz,

bitte keine Adressen löschen, hab die Hausnummer 1 wieder eingezeichnet.

Viele Grüße
map per
studioimnetz (2023-09-21 18:04:49+00:00): Hi map per,
sorry, wir wollten keine Hausnummer löschen, das war wohl ein Versehen...
Aber kannst du uns vielleicht weiterhelfen? Unsere Einrichtung ist in der Map (je nach Zoomfaktor) nicht zu sehen. Ich habe gestern den amenity-Tag angepasst, was die Sichtbarkeit etwas erhöht hat, aber optimal ist das noch nicht. Weißt du, woran das liegt?
Danke, beste Grüße
map per (2023-09-21 18:55:51+00:00): Die Karte auf openstreetmap.org bracht immer ein paar Tage bis alle zoom Stufen aktuallisiert sind. Einfach abwarten oder den Browser Cache mit Strg+F5 löschen.
Sanderllan Costa (2023-09-26 19:04:54+00:00): Condomínio existe
BolivarPeak (2023-09-27 07:28:58+00:00): Tradução automática
Olá Sanderllan Costa, Os recursos aéreos que temos ainda indicam obras em andamento, se você tiver conhecimento da área irei deferir para você essas características. Obrigado e tenha um bom dia.

Hello Sanderllan Costa, The aerial resources we have still indicate ongoing construction, If you have knowledge of the area I will defer to you on these features. Thank you and have a nice day.
arjunaraoc (2024-01-06 01:51:17+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).

Please upload your edits of nearyby areas as separate changeset.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141457286
OSM_RogerWilco (2023-09-19 08:42:56+00:00): ...und Bushaltestelle hinzugefügt.
user_5359 (2023-09-19 15:43:47+00:00): Welcome too OSM! I remove your SEO SPAM (mostly foreign keys). Please have a look on https://wiki.osm.org .
BCNorwich (2023-09-22 07:25:18+00:00): Hi, You placed some sections of footpath on top of existing service roads. Thus making duplicated sections of highway which disrupts routing.

It's OSM practice to correct/ amend existing objects where necessary, not draw over or delete the existing objects, this is to maintain the history of objects.

I've removed the duplicates and amended the existing ways to accommodate your new info.

Regards Bernard.
walking_daily (2023-09-22 09:00:05+00:00): Hi Bernard,

Many thanks for fixing this for me. I will be sure to avoid doing this in the future and will use the designated tag instead.

I'm really pleased that you spotted this. Can I ask, did you just chance across the error? Or was it spotted using a tool? Thanks again.
BCNorwich (2023-09-22 11:32:07+00:00): Hi, No trouble, glad to help. This one was spotted here: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-0.64019&lat=53.93099&zoom=7&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas

I do a lot of checking daily with OSM Inspector. Great Britain I check daily for Geometry mistakes. Then for Routing I check for duplicated edges, (this will highlight duplicated highways). I look at all of GB, and several other countries.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2023-09-22 11:33:30+00:00): I forgot I also map any additional features I see on my daily walks.
Byba88 (2023-09-19 09:02:43+00:00): 1234
Hashmush (2023-10-28 19:20:20+00:00): A lot of these buildings are oddly rotated and with shapes not at all matching aerial imagery. What's going on?

For example this one: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1209006588/history
wombatmaper (2023-10-29 10:42:30+00:00): Hej Hashmush, I agree some are not ideal, I will go through and improve/ fix some in the next few days. Thanks for the notice!
Hashmush (2023-11-03 19:02:45+00:00): No worries :)
Supaplex030 (2023-09-19 13:02:06+00:00): Hallo MariusEbe, diese Änderung musste ich leider zurücksetzen, da du hier einen Radfahrstreifen auf der Fahrbahn als separate Linie mit highway=cycleway gemappt hast. Das widerspricht aber der verbreiteten Art und Weise, wie wir Fahrradwege in OSM kartieren. Für Fahrradstreifen, die ohne physische Barrieren lediglich auf der Fahrbahn markiert sind, nutzen wir "cycleway"-Tags an der Straßenlinie (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway).

Liebe Grüße
Alex
Rodrigo Rega (2024-12-07 18:32:00+00:00): Reverted because this user had made a lot of fictional mapping. He does not answered the questions made by the community. His edits are not reliable.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160036081
Frans S (2023-09-22 09:33:13+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
A: Inaccurate mapped. 
D: Connecting nodes of buildings to other buildings or features like roads and residential areas.
E. Rectangular buildings not squared.
G: include the shadow of a building in the mapping.
H: Incorporated the yard or a clearing into the mapping.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141458448
Frans S (2023-09-22 09:33:23+00:00): Hello again.  FYI
Where clearly visible, add courtyards please.
This is how to map a building with courtyards.

 1   Draw the outer outline of the building as an area. Tag as a building
 2  Draw each of the inner courtyards/plazas as areas. Tag as needed, or not at all
 3  Hold 'SHIFT' and select all the areas
 4  Press 'C' to create a multipolygon with all the areas
 Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141458448
NorthCrab_upload (2023-09-19 09:20:18+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/219257979

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀