piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
kadiwa (2026-07-27 11:28:10+00:00): Hello MayDayPiolet,

Please pay more attention to detail in your changesets.
- The geometry of the sidewalk doesn't really match reality.
- Painted bike lanes are tagged on the road and not on a separate line.
- This bike lane is one-way.
- You forgot to remove the bike track tags from the roadway after mapping the bike track separately.
- While it is good that you added this crossing here node/14053533223, it is not actually marked in any way. There are only some markings in the carriageway area, which don't count.

Why am I pointing these things out? Well, it's pretty simple: The sidewalk and bike lane infrastructure were already tagged correctly before you made your edit here, and you kinda broke some things now. I have repaired them, though.

Regards,
kadiwa
MayDayPiolet (2026-07-30 06:59:09+00:00): Hi kadiwa,

Thank you for the thorough review and constructive feedback.

I appreciate you identifying the issues and correcting them. I apologize for the mistakes and will be more diligent in reviewing my edits to avoid similar issues in the future.

Thanks again for your guidance.

Regards,
MayDayPiolet
KartKollektor (2026-07-27 10:41:04+00:00): Kartieren von POIs und Micromapping an und um den Obertorplatz Hechingen

(Als Diskussions-Eintrag, da ich leider kein Kommentar zum Changeset hinzufügen konnte, wurde mit der EveryDoor-App erstellt)
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-27 19:17:07+00:00): SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more information.

Reverted adding SEO spam POI with blatant advertising, malformed tags/values and spurious deletion of valid building in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/186478647
ToniE (2026-07-27 10:46:11+00:00): Servus ThoDaPo,

willkommen beim OSM.

Ein wichtiger Punkt bei OSM ist immer die Herkunfts der Daten, der Informationen.

Vor-Ort-Recherche ist optiomal.

"Bayernatlas" ist leider tabu, aus lizenzrechtlichen Gründen, wir haben nicht die Erlaubnis seitens des Freistaates Bayern. Das für alle Arten von Informationen, auch für deren Luftbilder. OSM wurde diesbezüglich schon abgemahnt. Bitte nutze den Bayernatlas nicht mehr als Quelle (copy&paste).

Was deine bisherigen Edits (Changesets) mit Hinweis auf "Bayernatlas" angeht: die muss ich aus oben genannten Gründen rückgängig machen.

Schade um die Arbeit.

Viele Grüße
Toni
ThoDaPo (2026-07-27 11:23:58+00:00): Hallo Toni,

Dann werde ich wohl das nochmal ändern müssen.

Danke für den Hinweis.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen

Thomas
FajrAl (2026-07-27 16:04:42+00:00): yang benar?
FajrAl (2026-07-27 16:06:13+00:00): perubahan telah dipulihkan https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186466917
kadiwa (2026-07-28 01:08:24+00:00): Where did you get the surface value of way/1545049103 from? Guesswork like that is very much not appreciated in OSM. Please stop this practice. The correct surface in this case is obviously paving_stones.
PedestrianMapping_GeoMasker (2026-07-28 09:36:01+00:00): Thanks for pointing this out. I've corrected it. I inferred the surface from the imagery, but I'll avoid adding tags like this without sufficient evidence.
Negreheb (2026-07-27 12:58:29+00:00): Und hier hast du alles, unter anderem auch die vorher bestehende "Quartier Rauchmühle" https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/425756739 gelöscht, warum denn das? Ich möchte das ganze ja nur verstehen, bitte nicht im Stress noch mehr machen, das macht alles nur komplizierter aufzulösen. Hier ist nichts, was SOFORT gemacht werden muss. 

Ich hab ja auch grundsätzlich nichts gegen getrennte Wohngebiete, nur, dass ich das nochmal gesagt habe. Rest besser im Forum, denke ich.
Vektor_567 (2026-07-27 13:05:38+00:00): es wurde ein zusammenhängendes wohngebiet erstellt
voltairovicz (2026-07-27 11:52:44+00:00): :((
Dawid2849 (2026-07-27 18:45:16+00:00): No niestety. W ramach przebudowy drogi Cieszanów - Oleszyce wycięli wszystkie drzewa przy drodze. Jeszcze muszę skasować je na odcinku Dachnów - Oleszyce, bo w tej edycji zająłem się tylko odcinkiem Cieszanów - Dachnów
Wildsharky (2026-07-29 07:00:30+00:00): Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186501449
Tomas Straupis (2026-07-27 13:14:26+00:00): It is not a duplicate way, geometries were just fine, why did you change them?
melody_Tej (2026-07-27 13:22:10+00:00): Hi Tomas Straupis, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you.
melody_Tej (2026-07-28 12:15:05+00:00): Hi Tomas, thank you for reaching out. I should have done better in my changeset comment as the default one is quite general and does not cover everything in the task at hand. I’ll be more diligent in this in the future. Here the issue was a very short segment and I’ve worked on the alignment and the funnel model at the intersection.
Tomas Straupis (2026-07-28 12:21:31+00:00): There is no limit on the length of the segment. In this situation it is as it is because service road is a little bit before the merging of main road. Main road is separated only because of a minimal reason - physical security island on the crossing. So it happens and it is fine, nothing has to be changed here, there is nothing to fix. And definitely not by creating incorrect and unnecessary curved road geometry.
melody_Tej (2026-07-30 04:37:51+00:00): Hi Tomas, thank you for the feedback and the explanation. I understand the concern and will be more careful in similar scenarios going forward.
Wildsharky (2026-07-29 07:01:04+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186505982
yzal (2026-07-29 13:06:56+00:00): Dobrý deň, prístupová cesta do areálu  je označená ako access=private. Môže nabíjacie stanice používať hocikto keď je na nich access=yes? Dostane sa do areálu len na to aby si nabil auto?
matuszajac (2026-07-29 14:43:06+00:00): Prístup je cez vrátnicu. Ale je verejne dostupný. Nabíjanie je rovnako verejné dostupné.

https://charging.vasagroup.sk
Tomas_J (2026-07-31 11:21:33+00:00): Hm, tak žeby access=permissive na prístupovú cestu (súkromná cesta s verejným prístupom)?
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-27 19:46:33+00:00): SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more information.

Revert adding SEO spam POI as a node on a road with just name=* and promotional description=* in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/186480292
Wildsharky (2026-07-29 07:01:43+00:00): Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186509837
rajdhani (2026-07-28 10:25:41+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186510475
Franciszek Józef (2026-07-27 15:34:41+00:00): Hej,
Z czystej ciekawości, skąd wziąłeś ten obrys budynku? Jakie źródło? Chętnie sam bym zobaczył więcej info o tej inwestycji to się zaciekawiłem ;) 

Pozdrawiam,
A.S.
LovelyPL (2026-07-27 17:06:22+00:00): Obrys wziąłem od naszych projektantów, bo oni musza mieć takie rzeczy jak rysują swoje kreski.
A wizualizacje ktoś wrzucił tutaj: https://www.agora.tarnow.pl/viewtopic.php?p=193460#p193460
Franciszek Józef (2026-07-27 18:33:10+00:00): Dzięki wielkie! 
Byłem ciekaw co dokładnie tam powstanie i czy na całej długości działki. Teraz widzę, że będzie gdzie przejść po ukończeniu inwestycji - oby to było jak najszybciej, bo teraz trzeba albo Lwowską albo pod Zenit iść ;)
eggie (2026-07-27 12:22:48+00:00): Hoi,

Hier wat leesvoer hoe fietspaden te taggen.. Mis nu mofa nog.

G11: mofa=yes, moped=no, traffic_sign=NL:G11
G12a: moped=designated, mofa=designated, traffic_sign=NL:G12a
G13: moped=no, mofa=no, traffic_sign=NL:G13

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Cycleway

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-07-27 12:32:15+00:00): Tagging aangepast naar G12a
Svenboyy (2026-07-27 12:36:04+00:00): Hey eggie! Thanks for the feedback. Ik ben bezig met een scooternavigatie app en nieuw hier. Zal er in het gevolg rekening mee houden! Goed bezig :)
eggie (2026-07-27 12:49:10+00:00): Oke.. succes. Hoe het met het kruisende fietspad zit weet ik niet. Up to you.
eggie (2026-07-27 12:52:03+00:00): Het is je eerste changeset zie ik.. Ik zal je onze welkomstmail sturen met wat nuttige tips per PB,
Svenboyy (2026-07-27 12:55:05+00:00): Ja klopt de 1e! Thanks! Het kruisende fietspad is puur fietspad
Svenboyy (2026-07-27 12:55:35+00:00): Althans richting de watertoren is fietspad. De andere kant op ook voor brommers
eggie (2026-07-27 13:02:38+00:00): Oke.. Up to you... Ik sceen voor nu alleen en stuur de welkomstberichten.
In editor JOSM heb je een preselect.
Dacht niet dat iD een voorkeuze had voor fietspaden.
Wanneer je die gebruikt staan alle tags direct goed. Wel zo makkelijk.

editor josm stap voor stap
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/editor-josm-stap-voor-stap/75047
FajrAl (2026-07-28 03:06:03+00:00): Ada sedikit kesalahan; badan sungai dan jalan juga diberi tag building=stilt_house, tag itu diperuntukkan bagi bangunan panggung saja. Jika jalannya berpanggung atau gertak, gunakan bridge=boardwalk.

Beberpa sudah saya perbaiki.
yitimox (2026-07-27 16:59:53+00:00): Bölgenizde geçmişten kalan bir çok hayali düzenlemeler var. Sık haritacılık yapılmayan bu bölgede gelecekteki olası vandallıklara karşı durmanızı 
bekleriz.
kapazao (2026-07-31 09:48:28+00:00): No se dan referencias sobre el nombre modificado
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186452911
philipcullen (2026-07-27 12:56:34+00:00): Good idea - I'll add notes to any that are similar in future
eggie (2026-07-27 12:29:22+00:00): 
Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  Het huis lag nu uit het lood. Ik heb het teruggelegd.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
db-ak (2026-07-27 15:26:51+00:00): Halo halo, a ścieżki po stronie Czerwonaka? xd
Mercanto123 (2026-07-28 12:22:28+00:00): Racja :)
eggie (2026-07-27 12:26:04+00:00): Astrid  Het gebouw lag nu uit het lood en zat aan je weg vast. Ik heb het losgemaakt.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-07-27 12:27:33+00:00): Je edits https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=186453498#18/51.52066/5.32840
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-27 22:41:28+00:00): >  Then edited driveway to match all GPS maps and data to be "Westphal Drive"

As explained to you when you copied from Google before in changeset 186350485, you cannot copy from other maps without permission--one of the most basic rules of OSM is "Don't copy from other maps" https://osm.wiki/Don%27t_copy_from_other_maps .

https://osm.org/changeset/186350485

Furthermore, at least from a functional perspective, despite being given an official name, this in other respects appears to be a driveway, or at most a non-driveway service road, serving a single property; I wouldn't classify it any higher than that.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-28 06:53:39+00:00): Fixed in changeset 186499787

https://osm.org/changeset/186499787
bxl-forever (2026-07-27 12:21:06+00:00): Please do not retag buildings.
Add a simple floating point for the restaurant inside the building instead.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-29 20:14:29+00:00): As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality of your mapping and avoid consequences for your account and the features you map. See https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more information.

Fixed remaining malformed/SEO tagging for POI in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/186608336
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-27 22:27:07+00:00): I don't understand why you added a second service way, way 1545070416 , and made it a service=parking aisle? There's already a service way there, way 732959271 , and there's no parking stalls there so it certainly doesn't quality as a parking aisle.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1545070416

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/732959271

Nor do I understand why you connected service way to node 14053728916 instead of e.g. node 6863470290 , since it currently duplicates half of way 732959272 and is well off the actual alignment per all imagery sources.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1545070414

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14053728916

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6863470290

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/732959272

One of the basic OSM principles is that separate ways should only be mapped when there is physical separation, which I don't see any of here.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-28 06:52:49+00:00): Fixed in changeset 186500670

https://osm.org/changeset/186500670
gurglypipe (2026-07-27 12:32:59+00:00): I also removed the UPRN added to a node on the street in changeset 186365281 as from the UPRN and USRN databases it’s not clear what that UPRN is meant to refer to. It might refer to the street (if so why is it at one end on a corner, rather than in the middle?), or perhaps to a drain cover, lamp post or street cabinet. Who knows? Until we know for sure it shouldn’t be in OSM.
philipcullen (2026-07-27 12:55:55+00:00): My logic on this one was that it is the only UPRN linked to that USRN that is not unambiguously linked to a building, and falls on the centre line of a road with nothing else visible in the vicinity that is a likely candidate.

In my experience most areas add these street records at junctions, but some areas (like this one) do add them somewhere along the road.
gurglypipe (2026-07-27 13:04:20+00:00): Is there a definitive list of the categories of things which UPRNs can be assigned to somewhere? Something which could be used to rule out the possibility of this UPRN being assigned to any kind of thing other than the street.
eggie (2026-07-27 12:38:43+00:00): Dag Johan,

Volgens mij staan die haakjes verkeerd.
Hier een voorbeeld...
access:conditional=no @ (2025 Sep 20-2026 Apr 03)
eggie (2026-07-27 12:40:12+00:00): Verder heb je een berg schade veroorzaakt door te schuiven met een node waar van alles aan vastzit.
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=186454207#17/51.81654/4.40707
eggie (2026-07-27 12:48:15+00:00): Schade hersteld..
Die conditionals waren van een andere mapper
MassCartog (2026-07-27 23:38:27+00:00): Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap. If the private trail exists on the ground, it should not be removed. Instead of deleting the features, please use the access tags like access=private. Thanks
Hiking Ken (2026-07-28 01:34:57+00:00): It's been fenced in places and barricaded in others. You can't get to it.
ajmat (2026-07-28 16:59:02+00:00): Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186531275
ajmat (2026-07-29 10:28:46+00:00): Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186575515
eggie (2026-07-27 13:27:44+00:00): Welkom bij OSM?
leisure-park heb ik van het adres verwijderd. Dat is iets heel anders. 
tourism=chalet met naam Résidence Klein Vink staat overigens al op het grote vlak. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-07-27 13:28:26+00:00): operator=Roomot/Landal  spelfout?
m_fuhrmann (2026-07-27 13:20:41+00:00): Danke für deinen Beitrag hier in Fulda!

Falls du Anschluss zu der Fuldaer OSM Community suchst, schaue doch mal bei uns im Wiki vorbei: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Fulda
Wir haben auch einen Chat zum Austauschen, Events organisieren etc.
Frans S (2026-07-29 10:28:46+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please connect nodes of highways where they cross or meet other highways.
There is no need to map highways leading into the bush.
Check the instructions, please.
Best regards
dvdhoven (2026-07-27 14:48:36+00:00): Als je dat wilt doen, moet je het wel goed doen. Je kunt niet zomaar een fietsknooppunt ergens neerleggen. 
Een fietsknooppunt moet lid worden gemaakt van het fietsnetwerk, het oude knooppunt moet worden verwijderd en uit het netwerk worden verwijderd.
De routes moeten allemaal zodanig worden aangepast dat ze tot aan het nieuwe knooppunt lopen.
Dit is geen klus, die je zo even in ID doet, waarschijnlijk kan het, maar zeker weten doe ik het niet.
Ik heb nu alle schade hersteld.
Zet in een volgend geval even een note op de kaart ipv zelf aan de slag te gaan.
Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
kadiwa (2026-07-28 01:02:28+00:00): I reverted this changeset in changeset/186490830. This was a low-effort edit which did not make sense. All you did was duplicate a node representing a crosswalk.
liums (2026-07-28 13:21:52+00:00): Salut, question de curiosité - il y a plusieurs objets «Rue Sidi-Brahim», une rue résidentielle, un chemin piéton, et la relation qui prend toute la rue. C'est bien ce qui est voulu ?
O Fim (2026-07-30 05:54:10+00:00):  Vandalismo
remoção etiquetas inclusive tipo de piso
ftrebien (2026-07-31 01:56:17+00:00): Esta alteração foi discutida e teve o aval da comunidade local no grupo OSM Ceará no Telegram.
ftrebien (2026-07-31 02:00:29+00:00): Noto que, como problema restante, o mapeador "O Fim" adicionou calçadas onde não há calçada: em 3 trechos da rua Pedro Natale Rossi, em 2 trechos curtos da rua Senador Machado, e em 1 trecho curto da rua Pedro Rufino.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-27 19:36:35+00:00): As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality of your mapping and avoid consequences for your account and the features you map. See https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more information.

You made at least an attempt to fix the most blatant advertising, unlike the large majority of SEO accounts, so despite the SEO status, volume of malformed tagging and still somewhat spammy description=* justifying another revert for you to fix yourself, I ended up doing you a favor and fixing the remaining malformed/SEO tagging for POI in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/186479624
Mannivu (2026-07-28 07:20:45+00:00): Ciao, per quanto riguarda il Zen Lounge Bar, l'hai indicato con "amenity=bar" che si usa per indicare gli american bar, che servono per lo più alcolici e bisogna servirsi autonomamente al bancone. Quello che in Italia si chiama comunemente bar va indicato con amenity=cafe (infatti, più precisamente sono caffetterie).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186459184
fortera_au (2026-07-28 01:04:30+00:00): Hi, can you please use a more descriptive changeset than just "update"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186459644
Supaplex (2026-07-27 15:08:28+00:00): It will cause aome trouble of removing the space of the country code, area code etc
artemisiaarrg (2026-07-28 01:19:51+00:00): OK, I will revert it.
dypa (2026-07-28 11:27:23+00:00): Здравствуйте, объясните пожалуйста почему Вы считаете поле wikidata в данном случае не корректно заполненным? Поле wikidata относилось к зданию и статье википедии. При указании статьи википедии, это поле автоматически будет заполнено значением wikidata=Q55574684
Vladisl0ve (2026-07-28 18:40:30+00:00): Здравствуйте! Спасибо, что оперативно заметили правку! Устранил ошибку.
dypa (2026-07-29 08:31:12+00:00): Спасибо!
pwbriggs (2026-07-27 20:54:56+00:00): Thanks for updating this! Names are not used to describe features in OpenStreetMap. That is, a name=* in OpenStreetMap would usually be what's written on the sign outside. I removed the name tag from this building.

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names or reach out if you have any questions. Thanks again for your contributions and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
dp7 (2026-07-28 07:47:01+00:00): Ciao Maloss34. Il sentiero che hai tracciato, verificabile con le heatmaps, incrocia in più punti un'altra traccia molto più vecchia, che in linea quasi retta, con un'andamento piuttosto improbabile , parte da Pistrino in direzione Nord-Ovest. Puoi confermarne l'esistenza ? 
Grazie
Maloss34 (2026-07-28 09:44:01+00:00): Infatti, ho fatto  strada forestale, riportata poi in mappa, domenica 26 luglio in occasione dell'evento Montegallo Bike Tour. La registrazione è stata fatta con Garmin edge 850 (GPS multi-band) quindi la traccia è molto attendibile. la strada che ho riportato in mappa era già esistente ma è stata ulteriormente sistemata  dagli organizzatori per creare una variante utile in caso di necessità (così mi hanno detto). Riportandola in mappa mi sono accorto delle intersezioni che non ho visto percorrendo la strada, ma andavo in MTB. Nel dubbio non sono intervenuto sul sentiero (improbabile) e nel contempo ho chiesto ai local (gli organizzatori) notizie su questo tracciato ed ho inserito le intersezioni. modificato solo la parte finale poichè le due tracce differivano di pochissimo e quindi ho inserito la mia riclassificando il tracciato. Ho anche rivisto il video fatto con la insta 360 e non ho notato intersezioni immediatamente visibili, ma non di rado i sentieri se non utilizzati vengono chiusi dalla vegetazione nel giro di una stagione, quindi potrebbe anche esistere ovvero essere in disuso,  Ho anche provato a verificarne l'esistenza su siti web ma sembra sconosciuto o comunque non utilizzato (nessun utente strava è passato di li). Sto caricando i video su mapillary e in serata carico quello del tratto in questione così potete verificare anche voi. . Peraltro ho trovato che è stato modificato di recente ma la zona è abbastanza impervia e la traccia troppo lineare non sembra probabile. Nel dubbio ho inserito le intersezioni aspettando notizie dai local,  ma ancora niente. Questo è l'imbocco della strada (denominato per l'occasione batteria scarica) con un piccolo tratto, il resto lo devo ancora caricare (il video è in fase di elaborazione, ci vorranno un paio di giorni ancora ma lo potete vedere)https://www.mapillary.com/app/user/maloss34?lat=42.860725053989&lng=13.323251173545032&z=17.739502753003435&pKey=1084150100709164&focus=photo&x=0.5065700833617848&y=0.5334288149727077&zoom=0
dp7 (2026-07-28 10:17:37+00:00): Grazie per la risposta e per la condivisione di ulteriori informazioni/prove.
A mio avviso, il sentiero preesistente era stato inserito in maniera approssimativa, senza una traccia GPS, con l'intenzione di segnare il percorso che poi tu hai rilevato correttamente. Non credo possa trattarsi di un sentiero chiuso nel tempo dalla vegetazione: il suo andamento attraverso le curve di livello è assolutamente improbabile !
Attendiamo il completamento del video, ma, se non hai riscontrato le intersezioni, direi di rimuoverlo perchè così crea solo confusione.
Ciao !
Maloss34 (2026-07-28 13:16:34+00:00): Sollecitati i Local mi hanno risposto che esiste. Si tratta di una vecchia strada riportata anche nella cartografia comunale. Forse è stata riportata in maniera approssimativa (come nella parte finale che ho corretto) ma c'è
Maloss34 (2026-07-28 13:16:53+00:00): Ho chiesto nuove info ai local
dp7 (2026-07-28 13:29:23+00:00): Ok... non vorrei insistere, però magari fate un altro controllo... 😉
Secondo me è corretta quella che hai tracciato tu, almeno nella parte iniziale.
Grazie comunque.
Maloss34 (2026-07-28 13:33:42+00:00): Forse faranno un sopralluogo per verificare il tracciato
Maloss34 (2026-07-28 13:44:25+00:00): Quella che ho tracciato è corretta poichè fatta con un Garmin edge 850 multibanda preso 6 mesi fa. Comunque si potrebbe chiedere all'autore di correggere o confermare il tracciato. 
In serata carico il video su mapillary dove le immagini sono georeferenziate
user_5359 (2026-07-29 09:47:30+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Bitte schau Dir nochmal den Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1094267403 an. Was bedeutet der Tag Kisvasutert Kecskemét Museumsbahn = 2022 ?
eggie (2026-07-27 18:09:37+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
olo81 (2026-07-30 20:33:07+00:00): Jeśli nie ma oznakowania to nie dodajemy do osm.  Czy jest jakiekolwiek oznakowanie?