piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2023-02-21 16:36:13+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
Your mappings are too erratic in nature. A building is usually rectangular, sometimes with indented corners and extensions. 4,6 or 8 nodes are sufficient to map a building. The Imagery is also not ideal to map from. 
Each building need to be squared with the Q key as well. 

Best regards and keep mapping.




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132826573
VLD549 (2023-05-15 10:11:33+00:00): Hi, could you indicate which source you used to come to this conclusion? I'm asking because I can't determine it. According to Google Earth it is Wichelsestraat.
Thank you.
Ivan Lievens (2023-05-15 12:43:05+00:00): The official site of the Flemish government https://www.geopunt.be/ . It won't be the first time that there are errors on Google maps.
oba510 (2023-02-22 00:03:08+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4972855030/history doesn't appear to have any connection to the british chain you changed it to.

The official_name tag in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/414033713/history looks more like an operator name?  official_name=* would be the full official name of the actual school.

What kind of clothes does https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5529666651/history sell?  That's clearly not a clothes shop.  Same goes for https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5529666663/history (which looks like it might not even still be in business - their website redirects to someone else and the sign appears painted over in bing streetside)

Your other edits look fine, but please be more careful and don't just automatically accept every suggestion the validator gives you.
Dogman15 (2023-02-22 05:29:06+00:00): With the huge population of San Francisco and Oakland, any edits I make in this area are leagues more likely to get noticed than edits I made in less-populated areas. With more dense content, however, also comes more errors that exist because of other people who don't set tags correctly to begin with.
Allison P (2023-02-22 21:24:43+00:00): This is not an answer. Please fix the obvious issues with your edits.
Dogman15 (2023-02-22 23:13:38+00:00): Maybe I'll just avoid editing things in the big cities.
Allison P (2023-02-23 01:57:37+00:00): Then your intentionally poor edits will be referred to the DWG.
user_18526234 (2023-02-21 12:55:54+00:00): Hello Erin76,
  I seems that you have added or eddited some landuse=village_green. Please read:
  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse=village_green
  Would a more specific tag like grass or shrubbery be more appropriate?
  Please read:
  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landcover=greenery
  For a list of alternative tags.

  Greetings Tjuro_Bot
Erin76 (2023-02-22 08:08:11+00:00): ok, corrected. Thanks for commenting :-)
mavl (2023-04-25 09:05:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
Frans S (2023-02-23 09:24:22+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
Please do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.
They need to be mapped again. Task 1076 is still open for mapping
Best regards
akhilesw (2023-02-24 10:55:37+00:00): Hello Frans,
Thank you for reviewing our changeset and correcting the edit. Apologies for incorrect edits. Going forward, we will ensure to not repeat such errors again. Thanks once again for fixing the issue, looking forward to learn more from you.
Regards,
akhilesw
arnike (2023-02-21 12:51:43+00:00): شما دوباره نام رایج مردمی خیابان را تغییر دادید.!
چرا دائم خرابکاری می کنید؟
Mahdi Nameghi (2023-02-22 14:45:42+00:00): دوست عزیز

نام رایج باید در تگ loc_name بیاید نه تگ نام اصلی.
تگ نام برای نام روی تابلو هست.
لطفا بدون هر گونه سو گیری نقشه رو ادیت کنید. امید که روزی نیازی به استفاده از هیچ نام خاصی نباشه ;)
ممنون از شما
Jakka (2023-02-21 20:14:52+00:00): Il y déjà un numméro pour nouvelle  maison ?
Fahrenheit9 (2023-02-23 08:13:26+00:00): oui, mais je ne suis pas sûr de ce dernier, je repasse devant dans les prochains jours. Je regarderai
Jakka (2023-02-23 08:16:24+00:00): top merci
Fahrenheit9 (2023-03-02 17:13:28+00:00): Numéro 61
Jakka (2023-03-02 17:41:28+00:00): ajouter thx
eggie (2023-02-21 13:05:10+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback Accesstags zijn vaak default.. Je hoeft dus geen motor_vehicle = no en bicycle=yes te taggen.
Wel wat afwijkt bv moped=yes en mofa=yes..  want OSM ziet die als motorvoertuigen. 
horse=yes is ook niet default.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-02-21 13:09:50+00:00): tagging iets aangepast...  De defaults taggen kan natuurlijk geen kwaad. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Tag:barrier%3Dbollard
Temtasty (2023-02-21 15:25:06+00:00): Bedankt!
map per (2023-02-22 10:47:37+00:00): Hello Glevkos,

the restaurant you added (1) had already been mappe (2).
I deleted the duplicate.

Best regards
map per

PS: Ther is a further development of Maps.me called Organic Maps that doesn't track its users.

(1) https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10683047805/history
(2) https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1567316538
limes11 (2023-02-21 20:48:31+00:00): Hi,

hier kann wegen der Einbahnstraße ohnehin nicht abgebogen werden. Wozu diese restriction? Spinnen hier Router?

Viele Grüße Limes
Robert Whittaker (2023-03-12 09:36:32+00:00): Hi! In this changeset, you added designation=public_footpath to this way: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/152909708 . Could I check if this was a mistake, or if not, why you think it's a Public Footpath?

According to the Council data I have Blickling FP 14 and Aylsham FP 9 follow a path to the north of this track. See https://osm.mathmos.net/prow/progress/norfolk/broadland/blickling/ and https://osm.mathmos.net/prow/progress/norfolk/broadland/aylsham/ .
Robert Whittaker (2023-03-12 09:45:15+00:00): Also, you added designation=public_footpath to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/235428293 . But in this case, I believe that the footpath has been diverted around the farm. See https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/926782/row_3238952_od_.pdf .
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-21 11:40:31+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/756755458

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab (2023-02-21 12:11:16+00:00): Widzę że Puławska istnieje tylko zasięg wyszukania był tutaj zbyt mały. Sorki za pomyłkę!
Piotr Strębski (2023-02-21 12:27:57+00:00): spoko :-) dobrze, że takie zestawy zmian pozwalają też wychwytywać błędy w samych narzędziach!
Syl (2024-01-07 09:10:22+00:00): Bonjour, vous avez à plusieurs endroits utilisé le tag "notes" au lieu de "note", comme ici : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1148195973
Pouvez-vous corriger ?
anne_geovelo (2024-01-08 13:55:39+00:00): Bonjour, 
Merci c'est corrigé. 
Je n'en ai pas trouvé d'autres par requête, pouvez-vous m'indiquer la zone où vous en aviez vu? Merci d'avance
Syl (2024-01-08 15:15:09+00:00): Bonjour, j'en avais trouvé deux autres en m'aidant de Taginfo : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/139280538
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1977761547
anne_geovelo (2024-01-08 16:00:53+00:00): Top merci c'est corrigé.
Frans S (2023-02-24 12:52:29+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
I reviewed this changeset.
I noticed that you are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.
We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

Please pay attention to next points:
Keep yourself to the instructions.
You mapped and tagged the shadow of a few high buildings as grassland !! , I removed them.
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.
Each rectangular building need to be squared. !! 
Nodes of buildings may not connect to other buildings or features.
The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 
Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132831682
mavl (2023-04-25 09:00:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
Frans S (2023-02-24 12:54:49+00:00): Hello. I reviewed this task as well. Sorry to say. but you shall not find woods in this part of a city.
I remove them.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132831968
Frans S (2023-03-03 17:19:57+00:00): Hello. You mapped and tagged objects as "natural=industrial"
When you take a close look, you see tall apartment buildings.
About mapping of tall apartment blocks

Mapping of tall buildings differs from standard buildings. Because the imagery is taken at an angle, you see both the rooflines and also the side of a building. 
How do you map such a building?
Map over the rooflines and lastly slide the mapped building to the footprint.
Please adjust wrong positioned buildings as well
This video shows how that is done.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1V5-bADsYiffCD9bo6l64YOdTvmKqMGry/view?usp=share_link

And.... don't forget to square each rectangular building.

Best regards and keep mapping
wkdgs (2023-02-24 11:23:22+00:00): Is it really correct to add this way? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1148199871

Doesn't the racetrack use the existing streets? If so, it should only be mapped with a relation on the relaetd streets. The rest of the racetrack is mapped like that.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132832210
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-04-22 14:01:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135228709, 135225625 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to fictional edits.
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-04-22 14:01:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135228709, 135225625 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to fictional edits.
Frans S (2023-02-23 14:52:12+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project. 
Please square each rectangular building with the Q key.
Best regards and keep mapping
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-02-21 18:23:53+00:00): Not sure mapping private water wells is a good idea. Some details on private property should remain unmapped. It also reveals information that you've been to that yard.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Limitations_on_mapping_private_information
Arlo James Barnes (2025-07-21 16:57:43+00:00): Why's that?
ivanbranco (2025-07-21 18:12:45+00:00): wikimedia_commons=yes is incorrect, the value should always link to a Wikimedia Commons file or category. In these cases the tag is not really necessary since clients can retrieve the images (if present) via Wikidata.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-21 12:20:39+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o miejscowości.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/171964184

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
syntex (2023-02-21 12:37:33+00:00): poprawione
mike140 (2023-02-21 13:31:05+00:00): Більше не треба так змінювати Україну, тим більше у першому пакеті правок чіпляти кордон України. Ваші правки були скасовані. За питаннями звертайтесь в особисті чи в групу телеграму https://t.me/osmUA
skyper (2023-03-07 13:57:40+00:00): Hey Postman Lee,
ich kenne mich mit iD nicht wirklich aus, verwende eigentlich nur JOSM als Editor. Allerdings weiß ich, dass iD in Bezug auf Warnungen leider mit Vorsicht zu genießen ist. So ist z.B. nicht an jeder Stelle, wo Wasserläufe und Wege sich kreuzen, eine Furt oder auch ein "FIXME" (in Großbuchstaben) nicht falsch auch wenn iD das bemängelt.
Konkret habe ich jetzt die beiden Gebäude (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/227580598/history und https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/859560325/history) korrigiert. Da war das von Dir entfernte "fixme" noch nicht behoben, da die Umrisse nicht von Maps4BW stammten.
Auch habe ich die `stop_position` (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8418763180/history) mit allen Tags und Mitgliedschaften in den Relationen an die richtige Position verschoben. JOSM kann Knoten aus Linien lösen, ob und wie dies bei iD geht, weiß ich leider nicht. Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133403695.

Viele Grüße,
skyper
eggie (2023-02-21 13:15:30+00:00): Dag Bojan..
Je vraagt feedback 
layer=0  hoeft niet.
Adresgegevens Rotterdamseweg 139 horen  alleen op de adresnodes.. Niet op de vlakken pedestrian svp. 
Wanneer je het wil laten routeren kun je ook een lijnelement highway=pedestrian in het vlak leggen verbonden met omliggende wegen. 
Layer=0 en instellingsadres heb ik verwijderd.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-02-21 13:19:09+00:00): Dag KJamstra  Dit is way je hebt gedaan.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=132834376

Ik zie geen aangebrachte wegen.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-02-21 14:10:39+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-02-21 13:22:24+00:00): Je hebt van de highway=unclassified een afrastering gemaakt.... maar hoe staat die afrastering. Wellicht dwars op die weg?

Die afrastering zal toch niet zo lopen.
Als er een hek in de weg zt dan op een node barrier=gate taggen met access= ....  toegangscodes  

gr eggie
eggie (2023-02-21 13:40:48+00:00): Voorlopig het nieuwe wegennet  ingevuld
eggie (2023-02-21 13:52:43+00:00): De weg waar je een afrastering van heb gemaakt heb ik weer teruggezet en op een node barrier=gate toegevoegd met access=no
Groet
eggie
ivanbranco (2023-02-21 13:49:34+00:00): Attenzione però. hai aggiunto il nome della via ad un confine amministrativo, non al tratto di strada interessato. Correggo io, buon mapping
AntiCompositeNumber (2024-08-25 19:29:22+00:00): Hi, I reverted this changeset because it added bus route tags to an island multipolygon. There may be an error in whatever tool you were using.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155752674
AntiCompositeNumber (2024-08-25 19:30:08+00:00): (clarification: only the changes to https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15489360 were reverted)
eggie (2023-02-21 14:03:17+00:00): Dah Bojan,

Je vraagt feedback 
Lijkt me oke zo
MVG
eggie
Frans S (2023-03-01 10:44:02+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this task.
Please focus on the subjects which has to be mapped. Just Buildings and roads.
Best regards
habi (2025-05-06 07:32:02+00:00): Hey SSP_DW
Ich bin gerade wegen https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4743192 über deine Änderung von TempoSport hier gestolpert.
In OpenStreetMap ist die geographische Postion "wichtiger" als die Adressdaten.
Der Punkt landet nur am richtigen Ort, wenn er dorthin verschoben wird.
TempoSport ist nun seit ein paar Monaten am richtigen Ort erfasst: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12090632269/history
Ich habe deinen Punkt und den dort bestehenden zusammengeführt.
Gruss aus Bern,
habi
habi (2025-05-06 07:33:32+00:00): Ich habe das in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165877833 korrigiert.
DD1GJ (2023-02-21 22:58:41+00:00): Hallo SSP_DW,

bei OSM ist fast alles Handarbeit, so dass der Punkt nicht automatisch verschoben wird. Zudem war der Fahrradladen am Gebäude eingetragen, das natürlich stehenbleibt. Daher habe ich die Angaben zum Fahrradladen gelöscht.

Lege bitte an der neuen Adresse einen neuen Eintrag an, am besten als Punkt (node). Eine "Gebrauchsanweisung" findest Du z.B. bei https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Viele Grüsse, Joachim
eggie (2023-02-21 14:09:36+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
user_18526234 (2023-02-21 18:58:56+00:00): Hello ctruillet,
I seems that you have added or eddited some landuse=village_green. Please read:
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:landuse=village_green
Would a more specific tag like grass or shrubbery be more appropriate?
Please read:
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:landcover=greenery
For a list of alternative tags.

The object in question is:
https://www.osm.org/way/443859680

Greetings Tjuro
CAI Stabia (2023-02-21 13:47:31+00:00): Ciao Giovanni, i tag highway=track e sac_scale non possono coesistere xchè l'ultimo si riferisce a sentieri, come in realtà è il 328, sicuro della tua modifica?
Giovanni Forgione (2023-02-24 01:12:07+00:00): La modifica l'ho fatta dopo essere stato sul posto. Mi riferisco al lato est della vetta del monte Comune. Non ho toccato il Sentiero Italia (quota 860-870) perché non l'ho percorso, anche perché poco evidente sull'altopiano. Ho percorso invece il sentiero senza nome e senza numero che corrisponde alla staccionata panoramica a 850 metri di quota. Ho modificato solo il sentiero registrato (con precisione Glonass) e che ho percorso nei pressi del Passo di Preazzano. Il congiungimento del sentiero panoramico percorso con il sentiero Italia presentava un errore di accoppiamento che ho corretto. Grazie della segnalazione.
Langlaeufer (2025-02-20 09:23:43+00:00): Bist du dir sicher, dass dieser Bürgersteig existiert? Ist noch auf keinem foto zu sehen.
OSM_RogerWilco (2025-02-20 10:32:59+00:00): Welchen Bürgersteig meinst Du? Straße wurde letztes Jahr komplett neu gemacht. Muss ich aber nochmal aktuell prüfen, da ich glaube, dass sie die Beschilderung jetzt nochmal ergänzt oder geändert haben. Ich war kurz nach Fertigstellung da.
OSM_RogerWilco (2025-02-20 10:34:00+00:00): Oh, ich sehe gerade, dass das schon zwei Jahre her ist. Die Zeit rennt...
Langlaeufer (2025-02-20 10:39:39+00:00): Ich meinte am Abzweig Cordinger Straße. Wenn du zu dem Zeitpunkt vor Ort warst wird das schon stimmen, die Fotos sind älter. Aber vielleicht kannst du bei Gelegenheit die Fahrradfreigaben nochmal prüfen, ob die immer noch so sind ich hab dann wohl gerade auf Grundlagen von veralteten Bildern einen Gehweg ergänzt.
OSM_RogerWilco (2025-02-20 10:50:17+00:00): Ja, der Gehweg wurde da im Zuge der Neugestalltung Bergstraße ergänzt. Es kam auch ein Zebrastreifen hinzu.

Machst Du Deine Änderung dann wieder rückgängig?
Langlaeufer (2025-02-20 11:50:36+00:00): keine Angst, ich hab nichts gelöscht. Und der Fußweg auf der Westseite ist bereits wieder Rad+Fußweg
OSM_RogerWilco (2025-02-21 13:59:41+00:00): Ich habe es mir vor Ort angesehen und entsprechend angepasst. Ich liebe ja diese Wechsel von 240 zu Gehweg ohne Zeichen, dann 239 mit Rad frei ...

Ich mache aber mal eine Meldung, ob das Stück ohne Radfreigabe wirklich so gewollt ist, oder ob die ein Schild vergessen haben.

Ich freue mich schon auf die anstehende Neugestalltung der Quintusstr. Ist aktuell eine Katastrophe für den Radverkehr und danach glaube ich auch nicht, dass es besser wird. Vielleicht gibt tolle Schutzstreifen oder halt auch der Allrounder 239 mit "Rad frei"?
Palolo (2023-02-23 00:08:01+00:00): Thank you for the help mapping. Please note that there is no need to add the name tag "building". Thank you
MIKWELL (2023-02-23 15:41:07+00:00): Thank you so much for the remind
eggie (2023-02-21 14:08:00+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback   De format voor openingstijden klopt niet.
Gebruik anders even deze 'tool'. 
openingsuren-tool 
 
http://projets.pavie.info/yohours/ 
 
en plak het resultaat achter opening_hours

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Eclippsis (2023-02-21 14:26:38+00:00): Hi Eggie,

Bedankt voor de tips en links zal er nog een keer goed naar kijken. heb de openingstijden aangepast met de tool die je had gestuurd.

MvG,
Eclippsis
eggie (2023-02-21 14:28:52+00:00): Mooi.. Het zat 'm in FRI>FR en scheidingsteken ,> ; 
Mapse
eggie
eggie (2023-02-21 14:29:25+00:00): Herstel Fri>Fr
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-02-21 13:51:31+00:00): speed bumps are usually mapped as one node which is on the road. 

I'm not sure how to interpret ways.

I've added a node.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10683366989
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-02-21 13:53:29+00:00): Some speed bumps you've added are actually traffic_calming=table. You can edit this value at the bottom, in Tags section.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-02-21 14:02:20+00:00): See different values here
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:traffic_calming
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-02-28 06:47:22+00:00): Note that adding description in name is not really needed.

Is OsmAnd editor requiring/encouraging to put descriptive names? I noticed that large part of them comes from people using this quite rare editor.
user_18305684 (2023-04-08 22:29:50+00:00): Hi,

Why do you say that it is a water area and not a wetland ?
Do you know what is a waterway relation ? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9E%D1%82%D0%BD%D0%BE%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F_-_%D0%92%D0%BE%D0%B4%D0%BD%D1%8B%D0%B5_%D0%BF%D0%BE%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%BA%D0%B8 if needed.
Several watercourses + water areas + wetland areas mean that your relation 1445773 is not a waterway relation.
I suggest you to change it into a watershed.

Best regards
antonr (2023-02-21 18:08:48+00:00): Hej Niels,

Det ser ud til at du har flyttet nogle highway=bus_stop (fx https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8242928669, hvor ) til at være en node på vejen i stedet for ved siden af. Wiki er ret tydelig omkring at ved siden af er den korrekte metode: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=bus%20stop.

I eksemplet er den tilhørende platform også kommet til at se ret underlig ud: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/886471303

Mvh
antonr (2023-02-21 18:16:44+00:00): Og hvad er ideen med at oprette https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10683436713 når der allerede findes nodes for dette stop på hver side af vejen?
antonr (2023-02-21 19:12:08+00:00): Det forvirrer mig at du ved stoppet Ålykkevej/Julsøvej har flyttet det ene bus_stop til at være på vejbanen (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9615170541), men for stoppet på den anden side (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9615170540), har du ladet det være ved siden af og til gengæld oprettet en dublet på vejbanen (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10683436708)... Er der et system her jeg ikke kan gennemskue?
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2023-02-21 19:32:04+00:00): Jeg sætter public_transport=stop_position på vejen og public_transport=platform ved siden af vejen af vejen, hvor det giver mening (hvis der fx er et skur at vente i).

highway=bus_stop sættes af hensyn til legacy software. Det er muligt at jeg har sat for mange.

Men der er rigtig mange busruter, som er mangelfulde, og fx ikke har sat  public_transport:version

I tvivlstilfælde hælder jeg mod version 2. 

De to stop på Ålykkevej/Julsøvej  er ikke dubletter. De er forskellige steder på vejen og er medlemmer af forskellige busruter.