piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisReview (2025-03-07 17:55:05+00:00): #HighwayChanges

Hello, welcome to OSM.

In this changeset, some types of highway are being modified or added by you. 

Could we know the sources that you used? Thank you.

More information about the changeset: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=163315184
pitscheplatsch (2025-03-14 07:29:26+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163354477
mavl (2025-03-09 06:39:07+00:00): Здравствуйте. В комментарии к пакету правок ничего не написано. Подскажите, пожалуйста, из какого источника вы берёте адресные данные?
МаксимГ (2025-03-14 07:22:50+00:00): gps
mavl (2025-03-14 07:34:56+00:00): Не очень понятно. Адреса вы берёте из GPS? То есть пользуетесь какой-то картой?
mueschel (2025-03-09 10:22:58+00:00): Please check the 'rickshaw' tags you added. These are not in use in OSM. Did you mean auto_rickshaw or cycle_rickshaw?
uᴉʍOꓨ (2025-03-09 21:20:14+00:00): It's been updated. Thank you for the heads-up!
mavl (2025-05-13 15:08:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
literan (2025-05-04 16:54:37+00:00): здесь на съездах также не действуют правила автомагистрали https://yandex.ru/maps/-/CHr5EFNJ

аналогично соседней правке. Верну корректный статус согласно Соглашению.
gscholz (2025-03-16 10:35:19+00:00): Hi globeskater14,
your recent edits have created a lot of errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-0.38071&lat=49.27585&zoom=10&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=163316191

As you may know, this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps.

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2025-03-18 07:02:35+00:00): Hi globeskater14, 
these errors still exits, can I get your feedback here?
Guido
YuliyaSurta (2025-03-07 08:47:57+00:00): Incorrect source was mentioned. USGS 3D Elevation Program and Esri World Imagery were used for editing.
mavl (2025-05-13 15:06:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
aceman444 (2025-03-09 13:36:36+00:00): Hi, when you are adding meadows inside forests, you need to add them as 'inner' members of the forest multipolygons to really cut them our of the forest. Otherwise they will be understood as dsome meadows covered with trees, which is not the case here.
aceman444 (2025-03-09 13:40:00+00:00): Also, why are you marking everything as grassland? grassland is wild grass, see like a prairie in America or puszta in Hungary. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dgrassland and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:natural%3Dgrassland . Also note that what the wiki says is used in Poland does not mean it applies in other countries.
Aim311_ (2025-03-17 06:22:55+00:00): What are you getting at? Slovakia is very poorly mapped.
I corrected only one village slightly (unfortunately I didn't have more time) and some forest and already there is a big problem?
Aim311_ (2025-03-17 06:25:06+00:00): " you need to add them as 'inner' members of the forest multipolygons to really cut them our of the forest. "
Since when? The problem is only in the default view.
Aim311_ (2025-03-17 06:25:52+00:00): Hi. Thanks for your comment.
aceman444 (2025-03-17 06:48:49+00:00): You always had to add inner members of multipolygons if there were holes in the object (whatever it was, like building or lake). People just were lazy to do it for forests, as the default rendering on osm.org was hiding the errors. Now it no longer does it.
Aim311_ (2025-03-17 06:50:46+00:00): Thanks for the information. I did not know that.
Aim311_ (2025-03-17 07:15:08+00:00): Too many relations on a single object sometimes cause problems when editing large multipolygons (usually forests, meadows), in extreme cases where mapping is done only with relations (I hate this way because it complicates further edits terribly e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17155012 or https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5359731 ). Therefore, in my opinion it is good practice, if possible, to cut larger areas into smaller ones with future edits in mind, and to use relations themselves in moderation, like a condiment and not the main dish. I try if possible to avoid adding an excessive number of relationships.
aceman444 (2025-03-17 19:16:53+00:00): That is true, too many members (not relations) may complicate objects and slow down. Yes, big polygons could be cut into smaller ones. Sadly some of the forests in Slovakia were imported in the past and are imprecise so need to be improved now.
Jrachi (2025-04-21 16:19:48+00:00): Ciao.
Da Mapy.cz mi segnalano che dei loro utenti hanno trovato che i sentieri membri 4 -6 della relazione 821 sono segnalati come 820.
Non hanno specificato se si tratta di cartelli o bacheche o segni a vernice.

Tu sapresti rispondere se si tratta di l'errore è su OSM o se effettivamente quel tratto di sentiero riporta un numero diverso?

Ivo
micheleOSM3 (2025-04-21 17:25:01+00:00): Ho controllato i dati ufficiali CAI e corrispondono a quanto mappato su OSM. Se sono così vaghi non potrebbero aver visto cartelli che indicano come raggiungere il sentiero 820?
Jrachi (2025-04-21 19:06:44+00:00): Non so!
Gli rispondo come dici tu.
Potrebbero avere visto un cartello sul bivio e interpretato male la direzione, ad esempio.

Grazie, Ivo
eggie (2025-03-07 09:47:06+00:00): Dag Jeroen,

Kijk even hier .. amenity=charging_station is meer gebruikelijk en zal ook renderen op de kaart.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station

MVG
eggie
mk2k22 (2025-08-08 09:59:52+00:00): Hi, I noticed you removed the hiking route relation to Rjautza. It seems this relation is listed on the official ÖAV Wegedatenbank website as 663 Rjautza, so shouldn't we add back a relation here?

https://www.arcgis.com/apps/dashboards/6974b375d78f4eee866b317dca159d4f
PPete2 (2025-08-08 10:16:24+00:00): Hi, as a person in the linked note noted, the former "Wanderweg TRB" hasn't been marked and probably just a virtual hiking route. 

On the other hand there might be a not-yet-mapped route like Nr. 12 (I can't find Nr. 663 on hiking maps Kompass or Freytag & berndt) up to peak "Rjautza", so feel free to add it
eggie (2025-03-07 09:45:07+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Hufkratzer (2025-03-07 21:32:35+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1365260718 is quite small for a horse riding centre. It may be a small horse riding arena. In OSM horse riding arenas are usually tagged as pitch + equestrian, example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1192427748
Andrex88 (2025-03-07 21:51:05+00:00): It is pictured here: https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/7917593
Hufkratzer (2025-03-08 21:11:47+00:00): I assume the whole Stables in Cressage is larger than just https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1365260718. At least the stable building also belongs to it. Compare
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a#Riding_centre_(equestrian)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1089752556#map=19/53.466954/-2.566878&layers=P (example)
opline (2025-03-07 09:57:41+00:00): j'ai coupé la plage à l'est vers l'estuaire pour mettre un natural=sand car cette partie n'est pas une plage (interdite ++ à la baignade, forts courants proche pointe de grave)
opline (2025-03-07 14:13:41+00:00): avis demandé sur forum sur meilleure manière de taguer l'interdiction
oba510 (2025-03-07 11:26:45+00:00): Hi, welcome to openstreetmap, but please don't make test edits like this directly to the database.  Thank you.
Pan_Nug (2025-04-24 11:07:08+00:00): Hello Adeola_Anthonia, thank You for your contribution. I have fixed validation error between highway crossing way 1364994366, make sure to fix validation errors before task closure. Happy Mapping!
NeisBot (2025-03-07 17:17:09+00:00): Hi StefRaut, and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

I've noticed that over the past few hours, you've made several changesets with comments that might be unclear, difficult to understand, or consistently repetitive.

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good changeset comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments.

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment
NeisReview (2025-03-08 08:03:26+00:00): 👍 Vielen Dank für das Mappen der zahlreichen Hydranten in OSM. Der vorherige Kommentar des Bots ist hier nicht zutreffend.

#HappyMapping
philippec (2025-03-07 11:38:29+00:00): Gedaan, is gemakkelijk te verifieren met die twee gehandicaptenplaatsen.
Ik hou niet van AEDs op een lijn.
Dat heeft maar 1 voordeel : niet te wissen in Mapcomplete.
H4N5-antw (2025-03-07 11:53:25+00:00): Voor mij zou het belangrijkst zijn 1/ dat het een 'koekjestrommel' model betreft, 2/ de hoogte boven de grond en 3/ de afstand links van de hoek van het gebouw - dit met het oog op slechtzienden ; het ding is aan de wand bevestigd, dan lijkt dat bevestigingspunt de correcte plek voor de node?
philippec (2025-03-07 13:50:01+00:00): U bedoelt het Rotaid model, ik weet niet of dat met 1 hand te openen is.

U kunt height schatten.
Voor sommigen is 120 cm ook juist als het in het echt 80 cm is, omdat ze de relatieve fout berekenen op de muur van negen meter.

Dat heb ik al dikwijls uitgelegd :
- wat als het in de muur zit, of op de muur
- wat als het aan de andere kant is van de muur is
- we mappen niet de vijs
- OSM is geen building information model
- als het gebouw of de relatie verandert krijg ik bericht
- het is een puntvormig voorwerp, dus de centroide of het handvat
- het is niet omdat Mapcomplete graag laat snappen dat dat juist is
- en ik zal nu nog wel wat vergeten
Zauberwaldemo (2025-03-07 20:33:44+00:00): Lese Fehler meinerseits der Begriff Heideacker
habi (2025-09-09 14:33:03+00:00): Ciao Thierry
I'm looking at 'weird' building values in Switzerland, and stumbled over https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/432786704 which you've added as `building=chauffage_à_distance`.
In OpenStreetMap we use (british) English tags for describing the data of the buildings.
In this case, I think that https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Autility%3Dheating would be more appropriate and I changed it accordingly in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171690047

Greetings from Bern,
habi
habi (2025-09-09 14:37:29+00:00): Adding a descriptive name to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1365268611 is not necessary, since the data already implies a playground for kids: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:leisure%3Dplayground
habi (2025-09-09 14:40:27+00:00): As with other tags, the opening hours *need* to be added in English for https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10313724234
habi (2025-09-09 14:45:05+00:00): On https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/461697042 you removed the building-Tag, making it disappear from the map. The "wastewater plant"-Tags are already present on https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9379011, I've moved the name to there.
habi (2025-09-09 14:47:11+00:00): I've changed the issues found in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171690695, happy mapping!
MrLegendardisch (2025-03-07 15:06:33+00:00): Huh? De panden op de hoek (Nummer 32) stond nog, en is niet gesloopt, zelfde geld voor het pand van The Body Shop er naast. Alleen het SoLow pand is gesloopt.
IIVQ (2025-03-07 16:05:21+00:00): Ik had dit met ID gedaan, wat er kennelijk historic=ruins van maakt, in plaats van de building=ruins die ik bedoel. Jansstraat 24, 26, 30 en 32 heb ik niets mee gedaan, toch?
eggie (2025-03-07 10:19:39+00:00): Dag Nivkys,

Het is gebruikelijk om shed te gebruiken ipv barn. (Dat is meer voor een boerderij)
Nog een tip.. Maak geen vlakken vast aan de bebouwing.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-03-07 10:21:08+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dbarn

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dshed
eggie (2025-03-07 10:27:36+00:00): Probeer svp eens te reageren op de changeset
Dat heb je tot nu toe nog nooit gedaan.
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=19315085
MVG
eggie
Baloo Uriza (2025-03-07 16:33:00+00:00): I'm in this mall regularly, and these driveways are definitely not residential streets.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163320975
aceman444 (2025-11-23 20:58:19+00:00): Thank you for trying to fix building problems. However, shifting all the building parts was unnecessary to solve the problem. Do not touch buildings with source=kapor2 or source=ZBGIS if you do not use that source to cross-check your changes.
Byenin (2025-11-25 11:20:02+00:00): Hi aceman44, thank you for making the corrections. I’ll be more aware of the sources you mentioned and other potential imports in my future edits.
Jrachi (2025-03-10 08:24:50+00:00): Il gap è causato dalla chiusura di un passaggio a livello.
La provincia, competente per i percorsi escursionistici, è stata avvisata tempo fa.
Non è ancora prevista una alternativa.
Che io sappia!
Ivo
NeisBot (2025-03-07 10:39:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was flagged because your added description contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam
Allison P (2025-03-07 20:10:55+00:00): Reverted spam

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163342160
JeroenHoek (2025-03-13 10:54:48+00:00): Stuur je A67-A67 ook even een berichtje? Ik zag geen comments staan bij deze changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159497749

Als ergens de omgeving netjes ingetekend is met indoor-mapping zoals hier, dan is het niet nodig om dat weer af te breken immers.
Duja (2025-07-24 11:15:06+00:00): Nešto sumnjam da se bankomat n12643098056 nalazi na kraju ulice Botra u ataru, na ulazu u deponiju. Odakle su ti podaci?
Smajser (2025-07-24 14:41:21+00:00): Pozdrav,

svi podaci su skinuti sa njihovog sajta u vreme kada sam upisivao.
Sad sam pogledao na sajt i tamo stoji da tu postoji bankomat.
Duja (2025-07-25 07:07:15+00:00): Oni su sami dali nekom ćaciju da im unosi lokacije (a tako je i na Gugl mapama)... Međutim piše i "Botra bb, Benzinska stanica Miletić", što je na početku ulice, na Novobečejskom putu, i ima logike. Premestiću, al treba dvaput proveriti te njihove podatke (recimo, ekspozitura u NIS-ovoj zgradi je ucrtana u Limanski park).
Smajser (2025-07-25 14:09:28+00:00): Kod svih banaka su podaci vrlo škakljivi.
Uglavnom, proverio sam danas i u pravu si - bankomat je na pumpi.
Biće ispravljeno i na sajtu banke u narednih par dana.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-18 03:03:30+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165094217
eggie (2025-03-07 12:13:42+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
wolfy1339 (2025-03-07 23:28:49+00:00): Hello,

Please don't map fictional routing of railways.
There isn't *any* concrete route selected yet for Alto. The project hasn't even been approved for construction yet, and won't be up for approval for another 4-5 years.

Once a route has been selected, then feel free to map it.

Thank you

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163346800
mike140 (2026-01-04 23:54:55+00:00): Звідки ви взяли що та частина Садової - пішохідна?
aceman444 (2025-11-23 20:54:25+00:00): Hi, what intersection are you fixing here? It seems there was just a node needed to connect the building parts together.

The shifting of the buildings was totally unnecessary and incorrect, they were sourced from the Slovak cadastre and were correct. Also the shape of building 1998 was correct before your change. Why are you drawing features that are on the roof of the building (the extrusion on the western side)?
melody_Tej (2025-11-25 11:22:20+00:00): Hi aceman44, thank you for making the corrections and clarifications about kapor2 and ZBGIS. I’ll be more aware of the sources you mentioned and other potential imports in my future edits.
Nielkrokodil (2025-06-09 08:39:46+00:00): Hallo,
du hast den Bahnhof mit wheelchair=yes getaggt. Die Rampe dort ist viel zu steil, das schaffen viele im Rollstuhl nicht. Die fehlende Barrierefreiheit ist auch ein Grund, warum eine Sanierung geplant ist.
soemisch (2025-06-10 06:39:50+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. Ich habe nach dem Luftbild gearbeitet. Ich werde die Rampe auf limited setzen. Vielleicht kannst Du sie entsprechend anpassen.
Danke und viele Grüße, Lars
JakubS (2025-03-07 11:51:13+00:00): Nie widzę powodu, dlaczego obszar natural=scrub miałby być usunięty skoro zgadza się z podkładem ortofoto. Wycofuję tę zmianę.
Zakstankiewicz (2025-03-07 12:08:34+00:00): Bardzo ładna wizja twórcza. Proszę ją w takim razie zmienić w: https://geoportal.wloclawek.eu/map/www/mapa.php?CFGF=wms&mylayers=+granice+OSM+#
JakubS (2025-03-07 12:14:25+00:00): Społeczność OSM nie ma wpływu na to w jaki sposób Urząd Miasta Włocławek wykorzystuje dane OSM w swoim geoportalu. 
Jak już wiele innych osób próbowało wyjaśnić w uwadze https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4652236 dane OSM w żaden sposób nie reprezentują prawnego ani planistycznego przeznaczenia terenu, a jedynie faktyczne jego zagospodarowanie lub pokrycie na daną chwilę. To czy w OSM dany teren jest oznaczony jako landuse=residential, landuse=forest czy natural=scrub nie niesie ze sobą żadnych konsekwencji prawnych czy planistycznych.
JakubS (2025-03-07 12:16:40+00:00): Dokumentem planistycznym określającym przeznaczenie danego terenu jest Miejscowy Plan Zagospodarowania Przestrzennego, który jak widzę również można sobie wyświetlić w Geoportalu Miasta Włocławek.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-07 12:33:29+00:00): > Proszę ją w takim razie zmienić w: https://geoportal.wloclawek.eu/map/www/mapa.php?CFGF=wms&mylayers=+granice+OSM+#

bym to zrobił potrzebuję:

- ustalenie jakich zmian trzeba
- kontroli na tym serwisem
- zgody ze strony jego właścicieli do przeprowadzenia zmian
- opłacenia prac

aktualnie nie posiadam nic z tego i nie spodziewam się zmian w tym zakresie
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-07 12:34:29+00:00): (tj, jak ktoś wymyśli co trzeba by zmienić to dużo nie popycha do przodu, równie dobrze ja mogę se wymyślić jak zmienić facebook czy twittera)
Zakstankiewicz (2025-03-07 13:11:31+00:00): Szanowny p. Mateusz Konieczny, uprzejmie informuje się pana wizjonera, że Prezydent Miasta Włocławek już w dniu 25 lutego br. wszczął stosowne postępowanie administracyjne na mój wniosek co do załatwienia wszystkich kwestii według kompetencji do Wydziału Geodezji i Kartografii Urzędu Miasta Włocławek, również tych które to wskazałem w moich wszystkich uwagach w podniesionej sprawie społecznościowej OpenStreetMap.
Moja rejestracja w portalu OpenStreetMap wynikała tylko i wyłącznie z tego powodu aby ustalić dokonywane Wasze wizje twórcze i szczegółowo to udokumentować.
dzamper (2025-03-07 14:25:21+00:00): Czy można dowiedzieć się jakich działań (i na jakiej podstawie) zażądał Pan od UM Włocławek wobec OSM? Pytam z czystej ciekawości 😊
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-07 18:10:05+00:00): > Szanowny p. Mateusz Konieczny, uprzejmie informuje się pana wizjonera, że Prezydent Miasta Włocławek już w dniu 25 lutego br. wszczął stosowne postępowanie administracyjne

jak chcesz się podzielić pismem które wystosowałeś to ciekaw kestem jego treści

natomiast co do samego postępowania administracyjnego to dużo z tego nie wynika, na mój wnioske w zeszłym roku rozpoczęto 75
Duja (2025-03-09 12:10:14+00:00): Zamolio me mmns se uključim, pa evo...

Elem, mislim da je tagovati tu kapiju sa "turistička atrakcija" bilo malo preuranjeno ili preambiciozno. Za početak, treba da bude "kapija" (barrier=gate). A i "Ćacijeva kapija" je pre opis nego pravo ime... 

No, mislim da bi bilo adekvatno to vratiti tagovano otprilike kao tourism=artwork;  artwork_type=graffiti; inscription="Ćaci u škole"... bar dok ne prekreče (što se možda neće desiti nikada).
mmns (2025-03-09 19:28:50+00:00): Hvala. Dobar predlog. Samo ta kapija nije imala naziv a trenutno je poznata kao Ćacijeva kapija. Pre nedelju dana sam video turiste iz Kine kako se tamo slikaju. Uglavnom moj predlog je da se postavi, opštepoznati natpis a oznaka grafita,  daće dodatnu informaciju. Uglavnom ovom je prvo mesto gde je upotrebljen naziv Ćaci i sada je mesto poznato kao "Ćacijeva kapija". Ako se mesto tako zove, treba tako da se obeleži.
Srdjan023 (2025-03-09 20:30:13+00:00): Ја ћу се сложити са Дујом.
mmns (2025-03-09 20:55:18+00:00): Ok, molim te tako uradi. Da li je mozda pogodan i tag Historic.Place?
Srdjan023 (2025-03-10 12:22:29+00:00): Мало преамбициозно, пстоји тек пар месеци.
Duja (2025-03-11 11:12:45+00:00): Vratio sam Ćaci kroz changeset 163479995 :)
NeisBot (2025-03-07 11:54:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was flagged because your added description contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2025-03-08 08:10:10+00:00): 👎 Partly Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/163342208
NeisReview (2025-03-28 06:25:01+00:00): Partly reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164181078
kartler175 (2025-03-08 12:21:48+00:00): Your updates have probably failed:
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-63.76396&lat=44.62007&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.95&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways
Birchell (2025-03-08 12:34:44+00:00): my updates appear to still be present, im not done yet lots to do updating the natural elements of five bridge lakes wilderness area. 
im attempting to better distinguish the  natural landscape and remove the automated layout, however any assistance is appreciated
Birchell (2025-03-08 12:36:06+00:00): fairly new to the mapping of natural features. ive added and edited plenty of hiking trails, but any assistance or guidance would help