piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
damianeue (2023-12-02 10:46:08+00:00): Hello SekeRob, I'vge checked this tag on OSMAnd, https://openingh.openstreetmap.de/ and https://projets.pavie.info/yohours. Right now, neither of these three have a problem with the opening_hours tag, since OSMAnd shows it correctly, openingh shows an error about public holidays (but I don't know a general rule, MD publishes those hours only when an holiday is approaching) and I've actually created the tag using YoHours.
If I correct this tag as per your suggestion, YoHours shows an error and openingh shows the same error about public holidays. I don't know if OSMAnd would accept or understand the tag.
That's why I'll keep it this way. Obviously after Christmas I'll change the tag to reflect other holidays, if other particular opening hours are published.
ppku (2023-12-02 12:44:49+00:00): The grammar is at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours/specification

Dec 25,Dec 26 is allowed by <monthday_selector> because it expands to <monthday_range>,<monthday_range> which expands to <date_from>,<date_from> which expands to <month> <daynum>,<month> <daynum>. If a QA does not support that, it's a bug in the QA.

Dec 25, 26 is disallowed, because <month> is only allowed inside <monthday_range> AND there exists no expansion from <monthday_range> to <month> <daynum>,<daynum>. If a QA supports that, it's a bug.
Leo Slager (2023-12-01 23:23:58+00:00): En alle 15 beschadigde routerelaties zijn weer gerepareerd.
Leo Slager (2023-12-01 23:36:45+00:00): Ter info:
Met het opknippen van de Conradstraat heb je alle daar lopende routerelaties beschadigd.
Onbegrijpelijk omdat JOSM er op geprogrammeerd is om dat te voorkomen. Eenvoudig de vraag of ontbrekende delen geladen moeten worden beantwoorden met ja.
spaanse (2023-12-02 10:06:06+00:00): Bedankt.
Leerpunt voor de volgende keer: met sparse editing eerst wat gebied eromheen downloaden voor je iets splitst, zodat JOSM ook daar alle relaties ophaalt.
Metzor (2023-12-02 21:28:23+00:00): Hallo HeurekaDabra,

Willkommen bei OSM!

Baustelle und du hast sogar ein Enddatum und eine Quelle angegeben! Großes Lob, das kriegen nicht viele hin.

i-Tüpfelchen wäre, noch das unten zu beachten. ;-)

Schönes Wochenende noch
Metzor


Straßenbaustelle
motor_vehicle:conditional=no @ (2018 May 22-2018 Oct 7)

gesperrter Straßenabschnitt für "motor_vehicle" (z.B. wegen einer Baustelle) für einige Monate. Die Navigation sollte ab dem Tag der Baustellenfreigabe wieder funktionieren und zwar auch für Karten die während des Bauphase erstellt wurden
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Conditional_restrictions

source:motor_vehicle:conditional
HeurekaDabra (2023-12-05 11:32:57+00:00): Hi Metzor, 

lieben Dank!

Werde ich das nächste Mal beachten, wenn ich wieder über eine noch nicht dokumentierte Baustelle stolpere. :)
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2023-12-31 10:03:15+00:00): اهلا
هذا الاستيراد وما قبله لم تقم بنشره للمجتمع السعودي قبل أن تقوم باستيراده، نرجوا منكم اتباع إجراءات الاستيراد والتي من ضمنها إرسال رسالة للمجتمع قبل القيام بالاستيراد وهنا أماكن تواجد المجتمع السعودي:
https://t.me/OSMSaudi
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-sa
NagoyaGAWA (2023-12-01 14:28:30+00:00): 梅森ではなく梅里です。誤字。
marczoutendijk (2024-12-05 15:30:20+00:00): Hi PPete2,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1228046965
Don't you think that leisure=bandstand is a better tag for this object? (instead of building=bench)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure%3Dbandstand

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
PPete2 (2024-12-05 15:53:00+00:00): You're right, I tagged this by mistake as bench. Already corrected.
Frans S (2023-12-02 16:04:38+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
all changesets are  reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Not a single building has been mapped accurate and squared. Please improve your mapping skills.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144664603
troglobiont (2023-12-01 15:08:28+00:00): Ich habe den von dir gelöschten Weg bei Pustritz wieder eingetragen und wieder in die beiden Wanderwegrelationen eingegliedert. 
Den Weg gibts sicher (Wegweiser & Markierungen oben und unten). Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3131937
Ich werde in der nächsten Zeit mal vorbeischauen und dann die Note schliessen.
ceyu (2023-12-01 15:12:25+00:00): Danke dir.
mcliquid (2023-12-02 16:34:49+00:00): Hi, welche Linien fahren hier? Und gibt es auf der anderen Straßenseite noch eine Haltestelle?
rms_CVON (2023-12-04 10:51:36+00:00): Zum Zeitpunkt der Erfassung, die mit dem Projekt zur Barrierefreiheit erfolgte, gab es keinen weiteren Bussteig auf der anderen Straßenseite
NorthCrab (2023-12-02 00:41:23+00:00): After this edit, Mexico boundary broke around here https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3997013337
CharliePlett (2023-12-03 04:12:14+00:00): I fixed it now. Somehow when using JOSM I removed all the relations from one small section that I cut.
citrula (2023-12-03 03:30:03+00:00): Hi Garret Dees

I noticed you made your first contribution to OpenStreetMap. Congratulations, and thanks! As of now, you can consider yourself part of the US OSM community. Your edit is live within a couple of minutes. You may have to refresh your browser to see your edit.

If you have any questions at all, we can help out: if you think you might have broken something, are in doubt how to map something particular, or just want to know more about OpenStreetMap, contact us!

Here are some useful things to get you started:

* OpenStreetMap's US Chapter runs a [Slack](https://slack.openstreetmap.us/) server.  Slack is a collaboration tool for OSM mappers, organizers, and developers.  Slack even has our own #local-washington-state channel where you can chat with other Washington mappers. This is a very active forum and the best way to get in touch with other local mappers in Washington and the rest of the United States.
* I highly recommend using the OSM [wiki-pages](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/). If you're not sure how to map something within the editor of your choice, the quickest solution is look at [Map Features](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features) on the wiki. For more complicated questions you can ask/search on the [Help-site](https://help.openstreetmap.org/) or the #tagging channel on Slack.
* [learnOSM](https://learnosm.org) is a good place to learn more about OSM. Instructions are available for using the iD browser editor and the more advanced JOSM editor.
* Want to see who’s mapping near you, or want to see how much you’ve been doing yourself, check out the maps at [resultmaps.neis-one.org](https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/).
* If you are a business owner and want to learn how to add OpenStreetMap to your website, check out the site [Switch2OSM](https://switch2osm.org/)

So what should you map next? I highly recommend adding features around you. Restaurants, business, streets, sidewalks, benches, basically features that you know best. You are the expert. If you find a business already mapped, make sure there is an address. There is something satisfying about filling in the map around you. Or correcting a road when the local government makes changes to it. Do you have any special interests, like biking, hiking, or even trains? Did you know we have the best bike, hiking and train world wide networks of any site. But like everything else, they can always use improvements.

Happy Mapping!
blacx (2023-12-02 13:48:11+00:00): hem pots explicar que es aixo?, ni de conya hi ha un camí aquí
Frans S (2023-12-02 16:01:04+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
You mapped 2 buildings here.
1 very sloppy mapped. 
the other one not squared.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144665652
Frans S (2023-12-02 15:59:26+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. however, 8 out of 29 mapped buildings are not squared !

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144665680
Frans S (2023-12-02 15:58:15+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped., however, 14 out of 15 buildings are not squared ! 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144665736
Frans S (2023-12-02 15:56:45+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144665846
Frans S (2023-12-02 15:56:00+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. however, 3 out of 4 buildings were not squared!

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144665875
Frans S (2023-12-02 15:54:46+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. however , 19 out of 38 mapped buildings are not well squared!

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144665884
Frans S (2023-12-02 15:53:35+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144665885
pertile (2023-12-01 16:01:45+00:00): corregido, te faltó el tag motorroad en la traza pre-existente, y cortar la traza nueva para que no siga mucho más allá de la RP20.
En las imágenes satelitales se veía que la rotonda cambiaba de forma.
ToniE (2023-12-01 15:49:58+00:00): I just did it with the help of JOSM.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144667108
NorthCrab_upload (2023-12-01 15:50:30+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9997278644

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
dcskobuffs (2023-12-01 16:04:03+00:00): Correction: Source used was Esri World Imagery; Mapillary
Arlo James Barnes (2024-04-26 19:55:07+00:00): https://wikidata.org/wiki/Q123438277 had been deleted, but now it is undeleted and some details filled in.
A35K (2023-12-01 16:10:39+00:00): Danke!
eggie (2023-12-02 07:22:30+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
rawcomposition (2023-12-05 18:26:16+00:00): Hey I just noticed you added a "footpath" across the Little Cuyahoga River, but that's actually just a pipeline with tall fences up to prevent any crossing at all, so it really isn't a footpath/bridge. I can go take pics of it this afternoon to verify if that helps. The paths you added on either side aren't really paths either, just a patch of grass
rawcomposition (2023-12-05 22:43:35+00:00): I took a picture this afternoon of the "bridge" showing it's just a pipeline with no actual walkway. Hope that helps! 

https://www.flickr.com/gp/rawcomposition/7624P48VBj
PLima785 (2023-12-04 13:33:28+00:00): Eles ainda não acabaram de construir na antiga fabrica de cobre, abriram sim as lojas na frente. Eu acho que não vai ser tudo para zona comercial
PedroMTG13 (2023-12-04 13:37:15+00:00): Eu vi que era estacionamento na parte de trás
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-12-03 10:04:05+00:00): Hi, in such cases when pedestrians and cyclists are on the same path, you shouldn't create two paths. You should add one path which can be used both by cyclists and pedestrians.

In this case, such path already exists!
Only problem is that it's a highway=footway, which isn't very good. But because of bicycle=designated access tag cyclists are allowed to use it.

I'll rollback this change. And change highway value to path.

You can find more info on mapping cycling infrastructure in the wiki
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle

and here 
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mapping-cycleways-in-estonia/104894
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-12-03 09:56:00+00:00): Hi, welcome!

highway=service shouldn't stop where parking starts, it should go inside. Routing software does not route through parking lots, so the initial position of this way was correct.

There was also a parking before, but marked not as area, but a node at the tip of the highway. It still exists. You should remove it. You can do it either
1) By clicking on feature type and selecting "Point"
2) Removing it in "Tags" section
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-12-03 09:57:37+00:00): You can also add a boom barrier / lift gate to the entrance and select appropriate access on the parking lot, if it's private or only for customers, if you want.
aTarom (2023-12-01 19:18:16+00:00): Hola IslaDeva, gracias por editar, una duda por favor, a veces se mueven elementos sin querer y por ello la pregunta, en el pico
"Penya Blanca"
en
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1243410938/history
la nueva ubicación tiene elevación diferente, si no es accidental, recuerda si puedes actualizarla, parece que está sobre los 425 m según curvas de nivel de la capa raster del IGN, pero hay un pico con ese nombre a 300 m Sur con 390 m de elevación
Saludos
TrekClimbing (2023-12-02 21:41:52+00:00): Hi there. Do you think you should have merged the Wilko node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11386363460 (and removed tags) with the building you created? It looks like there's two Wilkos next to each other. Cheers
plymothian (2023-12-05 08:52:33+00:00): I though I had deleted all the standalone tags; must have missed that one
MxxCon (2023-12-03 01:53:38+00:00): This is not how you map POIs that are out of business.
You supposed to use lifecycle prefixes as documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
Putting "Abandoned" in the name is WRONG.
Please correct this or your changeset will be reverted in full.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144668376
julcnx (2023-12-07 06:47:46+00:00): Just a friendly tip for next time, it's a good practice to save and upload your changes before moving on to the next area. You can find more information on changesets and their geographical size at: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Also adding a clear description makes it easier for others to review your changes: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144668376
Dawid2849 (2023-12-08 18:05:25+00:00): Ale to jest to oficjalna nazwa drogi, możesz sobie sprawdzić na warstwie z geoportalu... wycofałem
Mex (2023-12-04 09:47:29+00:00): looks good, but try and use the square up feature (q shortcut in ID) to make your building have nice square corners.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144669030
Frans S (2023-12-02 15:52:02+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Despite you mapped here just a few buildings, 1 was badly shaped. the others not squared.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144669057
alexnder (2023-12-08 08:51:05+00:00): Remove this, please. OSM is not a place where to map all the things that once were there. If it's not on the ground at this moment, it shouldn't be mapped.
Sorain (2023-12-10 16:24:11+00:00): I've been mapping OSM for 15 years and I don't think you're in a position to tell me what to map and what not. Most countries map their former railways, especially for OpenRailwayMap. They do not interfere with anything (streets, buildings or nodes), and even more, they also have a mapping guide on WikiSource. Please mind your own business if you are not sufficiently documented.
alexnder (2023-12-10 18:02:12+00:00): I guess you're mixing OpenRailwayMap with OpenHistoricalMap. 

In the present day there's no trace on the ground of the railways that you've mapped, so they don't need to be here. But OpenHistoricalMap will gladly accept them.
woodpeck (2024-02-11 18:50:56+00:00): Dear Sorain, user "alexnder" is correct, and your 15 years of mapping are not an excuse to map non-existent features in OSM. The community differs in their interepretation of "railway=razed" but it is absolutely clear that once a former railway line has been built over, then there is no place for it in OSM anymore - not as "abandoned", not as "disused", and not as "razed". I have removed a few of your razed railway lines where it was obvious from imagery that new buildings had been constructed on top. Please do not map things that no longer exist. If you find any guidelines anywhere that tell you to add such lines even under shopping malls, then please help OSM by editing these guidelines accordingly. Thank you - Frederik Ramm, OSMF Data Working group, handling this as ticket 
Ticket#2024021110000135
Sorain (2024-02-14 13:29:24+00:00): If you are so diligent in deleting such edits, continue your work with the tens of thousands of km of lines marked on OSM as razed from the 19th and 20th centuries, which no longer exist and over which whole neighborhoods were built, but they are marked and continue to be marked in countries such as Italy, Hungary and so on. I edit following the rules of the OSM wiki, what you say is not in accordance with the rules. If you think you are as big an activist for OSM as you claim in your biography, go ahead and change the OSM regulations. Until then, your words are empty and inconsistent with the rules. Your position as an OSM activist does not scare or impress me at all. Please show your superiority complexes in organized fan conferences, not here on the official platform, where you do not hold any higher position on the platform than as a simple contributor, at the same time you are not part of the official board of OSM or to be recognized by to this one. Prior to this message, I reported your irregular activity to the OSM board, and if you continue it, like your list of blocked people, you will have the honor of being part of such a list. 

Warm regards, Sorin Petric
woodpeck (2024-02-14 14:38:45+00:00): Sorain, this is not about me or my biography, it is about https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Drazed which says: "Avoid mapping former railways if it is impossible to determine the former route from the ground or aerial imagery". If this is the rule you are following then everything is fine.
emersonveenstra (2023-12-02 14:27:09+00:00): Hi there,

On https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1228061412, oneway highways should never have :backward or :forward for lane data, the turn lane data should be in a key called "turn:lanes". Could you please fix that? Thanks!
Dave Nadolsky (2023-12-03 00:50:57+00:00): Thx for comment. Believe I just fixed both issues. Starting to feel like you're my personal error-checker, Em. I submit fair # of OSM updates & you're 1 of only couple folks identifying issues. :-) I kind of swagged the original tags on this oneway highway for lanes & turns. Figured "over tagging" wouldn't hurt. Plus, editor didn't flag any issues. Thx for the instruction; I'm now smarter going fwd.