piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
El ArquiPachuca (2025-11-20 16:13:15+00:00): Thank you so much for contribution Ian Gerardo. I check the error with road Blvr del Minero and it was edited. Usually this happen when zoom in and zoom out very quickly.
pitscheplatsch (2025-11-20 16:16:25+00:00): Thanks for fixing, El ArquiPachuca
hahae (2025-12-02 01:53:53+00:00): 您好，请问“漣澪靈”是否也是您？您添加的很多地名不复存在，应当移步 OpenHistoricalMap 添加，不应当再在 OSM 上出现了。另外，明确已经拆除的村落，也不应当添加到 OSM. 这有违 OSM 的实地原则。
user_5359 (2025-11-21 09:34:44+00:00): Welocme to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/8591392953. What is the mean of the tag 廃駅 = 歌志内?
Please notice we use british english for the keys (and values, if they are countable).
Frans S (2025-11-21 11:45:58+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks that might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174887586
Frans S (2025-11-21 11:46:17+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174887586
Frans S (2026-01-06 13:41:04+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
Buildings should be tagged as 'building=yes' rather than house.
Issues found on your mappings
A: Inaccurate mapping. 

D: Connecting nodes to other features.

E: Buildings not squared or rounded.


Explanation can be found in this document which  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174888085
FMC-Henri (2025-12-01 14:57:57+00:00): Hallo Techtipss3000,

bitte die Art der Straße durch Angabe des `construction` Tags beibehalten. Ich habe es hier entsprechend ergänzt. 

Aber eine Nachfrage: Kannst du erläutern, was es hier für eine Sperrung gibt? Ist die Baustelle hier längerfristig?

Grüße
Henri
Dean Leichtle (2025-12-02 21:08:11+00:00): Hallo Henri,

ursprünglich war nur eine kurze Sperrung vom 24.11. bis 28.11. geplant, da zwei Kräne für die Renovierung des Knorr-Bremse-Gebäudes aufgestellt werden sollten. Offenbar gab es jedoch technische und organisatorische Komplikationen, sodass die Arbeiten nicht wie vorgesehen abgeschlossen wurden.

Die Straße ist deshalb auf unbestimmte Zeit gesperrt, bis die Probleme behoben und die Kranarbeiten vollständig abgeschlossen sind.

Ich habe die Sperrung entsprechend eingetragen und die Angaben beibehalten.

Viele Grüße,
Dean
CS2100 (2025-11-20 03:36:20+00:00): Brainfart: should say New Minas
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-02 10:18:41+00:00): Hello!

You used
colour=weiß
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13284348865/history

Have you maybe meant
colour=white
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
NeisBot (2025-11-20 06:37:45+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly.

In total, I detected 7 potential crossings.

Problematic elements (top 3 by category):
- https://osm.org/way/1001026568 | crossings=4
- https://osm.org/way/1001026571 | crossings=3

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=174889444
pitscheplatsch (2025-11-23 14:10:15+00:00): Has been corrected by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174892679
btwhite92 (2025-11-21 20:51:11+00:00): Hi there,
'Motoway' is used to denote a divided, fully access controlled highway (aka, a freeway) in the US. Please see here for California specifically: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/California/2022_Highway_Classification_Guidelines
Frank Peng (2025-11-20 04:35:46+00:00): Forgot to add this in the changeset comment:
"I forgot about this when I split the way from its adjoining way after adding the placement tag."

Correct changeset comment:
"Removed placement tag from newly created way. I forgot about this when I split the way from its adjoining way after adding the placement tag."
evgenykatyshev (2025-11-20 16:45:42+00:00): Не забывайте слово ქუჩა в названии улиц
ArchangelEkim (2025-11-22 02:01:43+00:00): Hey Jake, all the dates here have the wrong year, should be 2025
ArchangelEkim (2025-11-23 03:50:05+00:00): Fixed in this changeset: 175012312.
ArchangelEkim (2025-11-23 03:50:33+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175012312
jakecopp (2025-11-25 00:58:05+00:00): Hi ArchangelEkim, thanks very much for catching and fixing this.
1538615423865283 (2025-11-20 05:10:38+00:00): I added the wrong source, it should be https://nj.gov/lps/njsp/division/homeland-security/pdf/TSB/TSB_Map.pdf
pitscheplatsch (2025-11-20 06:53:18+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OSM!

Thanks for contributing. I noticed that this edit removed the entire island element for Dokdo/Takeshima. 

Because this location is internationally known and locally verifiable, and also subject to an international naming dispute, OSM aims to include all relevant data with a neutral and on-the-ground approach.

Could you please share the reasoning or sources for removing this feature? If there was an issue with the previous tagging, we can correct or improve it together rather than deleting the element entirely.
ChangwooRyu (2025-11-20 13:30:50+00:00): 이 노드는 "독도리"라는 마을 노드였는데 훼손되고 잘못 복구되는 과정을 통해 "독도"처럼 보이게 변한 것입니다. 훼손을 복구하시겠다는 의도는 잘 알겠으나 정확한 히스토리를 보지 않으시고 삭제부터 하시는 것은 잘못된 방식입니다.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-11-20 06:14:41+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18981
skorasaurus (2025-12-14 18:12:07+00:00): Hi, 

Thanks for your interest in adding buildings in Cleveland. 

If you're interested, a couple of us local OSM editors are adding buildings using the building data set from Cuyahoga County; we cleared it with them and the county is a-ok with us adding the buildings to OSM. 

The accuracy and detail to the buildings from the cuyahoga county data set is much higher than the the Microsoft/mapwithai buildings. 

For example of an area mapped with county building data, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/?#map=17/41.463079/-81.708552

If you'd like directions and a workflow of how to add the buildings from the couny daa set, let me know :)
NeisBot (2025-11-20 06:37:49+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly.

In total, I detected 13 potential crossings.

Problematic elements (top 3 by category):
- https://osm.org/way/580297529 | crossings=7
- https://osm.org/way/588606583 | crossings=6

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=174890878
pitscheplatsch (2025-11-23 14:09:44+00:00): Has been corrected by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174934069
mavl (2026-01-04 06:32:24+00:00): Это пакет правок отменён по причине использования несовместимого источника данных.
NeisBot (2025-11-20 06:21:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisBot (2025-11-20 06:21:42+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Fitness equipment retailer and gym fitout specialist"
NeisReview (2025-11-23 14:13:10+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/174893582
pwbriggs (2025-11-20 07:14:05+00:00): Route 75 is temporarily diverted for construction closures.

I also edited the Northgate-bound relation (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174892176) and added a U District-bound temporary stop at 16th & 125th (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174892654, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174892763).

The diversion is scheduled to last until 26th March 2026 (Metro alert ID 79962). However, the temporary stop at 125th and 16th seems like it will be returned to normal on 20th January 2025.

See also this note with route information: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5058840.

Let me know if anything looks strange. This is my first time working with bus relations.
pwbriggs (2025-11-20 07:20:13+00:00): Metro's route page: https://kingcounty.gov/en/dept/metro/routes-and-service/schedules-and-maps/075#route-map
BaboucheVerte (2026-04-24 16:39:07+00:00): Hi, I've update in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181774209 

There wasn't two primary that merge before crossing Shiv Das Puri Marg + inexisting connections. Just surveyed it.
AndyB_66 (2025-11-27 09:51:38+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
pwbriggs (2025-11-20 06:44:12+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174891657 for U District-bound edit, and more context.
Tris_1220 (2025-11-20 07:22:21+00:00): Das Format der Öffnungszeiten sollten jetzt passen.
Lezurex (2025-11-20 08:35:10+00:00): Hallo Marcus,

In dem Falle am besten noch payment:cash=no hinzufügen, um explizit festzuhalten, dass kein Bargeld akzeptiert wird. Wenn payment:cash nicht definiert ist, geht man i. d. R. davon aus, dass Bargeld akzeptiert wird.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:payment:*

LG Lezurex
Marcus Fihlon (2025-11-20 08:39:04+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis, @Lezurex, habe ich gemacht.
K4DYCE (2025-11-20 06:51:40+00:00): By the way, even if this was labeled correctly, the RV doesn't sit at this location (confirmed by my local knowledge).
K4DYCE (2025-11-20 06:52:59+00:00): I meant it doesn't sit at this location anymore, but you get the gist. It was removed from this location about a year ago.
pwbriggs (2025-11-20 07:20:50+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174891657
eggie (2025-11-20 11:31:07+00:00): Dag Wonderful Alligator,

Het beste kun je het bedrijf taggen op de adresnode. Dus niet op de gebouwomtrek.
Wellicht heeft het bedrijf ook een naam?

MVG
eggie
icestormy (2026-05-22 09:31:29+00:00): Warum ist Josefsberg als noname=yes getaggt? Gibt ja dort sogar ein Ortsschild.
icestormy (2026-05-22 09:33:26+00:00): Löst nämlich auch im OSMI einen Fehler "village without name" aus:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=places&lon=15.31397&lat=47.84442&zoom=18&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=errors_population_format%2Cerrors_place_without_name%2Cerrors_pop_type_mismatch%2Cpopulation
SKald (2026-05-22 09:48:16+00:00): Das war offenbar ein Fehler von mir.
Ist gefixt.
pfg21 (2025-12-24 11:18:32+00:00): on the basis of what it was considered that this trail stopped working??
rhhs (2025-12-24 11:29:14+00:00): As I wrote: the information in the note. There are several sites that also say it is closed.
pfg21 (2025-12-26 11:00:26+00:00): The path is marked with the tag sac_scale=demanding_alpine_hiking, which fully describes the difficulty of passing through it.  very difficult, but possible.
deleting a path is being rolled back
rhhs (2025-12-26 11:08:55+00:00): I did not delete the path, just tagged it as not accessible and disused. I trust that the note accurately described the situation as a closed (forbidden) path. If you think that doesn't describe the actual situation, please correct.
rhhs (2025-12-26 15:23:39+00:00): I tagged the path as disused so that it will not show on most map apps, and people will not be tempted to use it because their map shows it (often without information on its dangers and access status). I think we as OSM mappers have a certain responsibility to discourage hikers from using illegal and dangerous paths.
eggie (2025-11-20 08:57:52+00:00): Hoi,

Je vraagt feedback... Wanneer het verboden Toegang is dan is access=no voldoende. Je hoeft dan niet al andere categorieën te noemen.
Routeren zal het overigens niet. Het is alleen maar cosmetisch op de kaart. Ook voor dat bouwverkeer bij gebruik van een OSM app.

Mapse,
eggie
Chiel van de Logt (2025-11-24 15:14:50+00:00): Top, bedankt voor de terugkoppeling.

Gr. Chiel
Branko Kokanovic (2025-12-01 21:25:59+00:00): Hvala, evo slucajno i ja naleteo sad na ovu gresku i ispravio jos jedan segment. Nasao sam ovde ime: https://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9B%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BE%D1%80_%D0%91%D0%B0%D1%9A%D0%B8%D1%86%D0%B0
Tris_1220 (2025-11-20 13:44:47+00:00): Zwei Sachen:
1. Ist das Radfahren da wirklich erlaubt, war zwar länger nicht mehr dort, wäre mir aber neu das man da fahren darf.
2. Der Route fehlt am Ende eine Verbindung zur Arbeiterstrandbadstraße und die Brücke in der Mitte fehlt.
DerKaiserschmarren (2025-11-21 08:07:59+00:00): Es waren Radwegschilder am östlichen ende aufgestellt, die kein Ende hatten.
NaufalFarras (2026-06-09 22:47:31+00:00): I just want you to know, you accidentally changed Transjakarta route relation to a waterway here :)
eggie (2025-11-20 09:07:12+00:00): Dag tml.. Je vraagt feedback.
Meestal zullen die brugdoorsteken ook voor fietsers zijn. Dan zal het niet een wandelpad (footway)  zijn met een G7 bord als je er mag fietsen.
Ik maak er nu even een highway=path van ..
Verder routeren zal het niet van de wijk staat nog op construction.

MVG
eggie
Glassman (2025-11-21 00:36:08+00:00): The business was already tagged but you did add more useful info. Another user merged yours with the existing data
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174895877
Tjuro (2025-12-26 08:09:26+00:00): Beste NytramZ,

Ik zie dat je hier een school toegevoegd hebt, hierbij heb je hem meerdere keren toegevoegd. Voor poi's zoals scholen supermarkten etc is het de bedoeling dat er maar één object bestaat voor het element.

Ook is het incorrect om poi's te combineren met het gebouw.

Voor meer informatie zie:

wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element

Met vriendelijke groet,

Tjuro
BCNorwich (2025-11-21 07:26:10+00:00): Hello,
I just wanted to let you know that you inadvertently tagged a drain (Way: Beck Valley Storm Water Culvert (1094967519) as a highway underneath Way: Sneinton Dale (1452290777). This could have caused problems to routing, thus I've reverted the drain tags.

Regards Bernard.
Supaplex (2025-12-03 13:51:40+00:00): HI

Please restrain your edit to at least two changesets, making other mappers easiler to review
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174896413
TrickyFoxy (2025-12-18 09:10:26+00:00): По итогу вы так и не добавили нужную вам точку. Можете отметить её тут https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/new
TrickyFoxy (2025-12-18 09:11:14+00:00): а, вы уже добавили заметку, окей https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5061945
AndyB_66 (2025-11-20 20:42:53+00:00): Bitte beachten Sie die Kommentarregeln der OSM-Community für Änderungssets: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
morkovkin (2026-05-02 17:11:21+00:00): Здравствуйте!
1. Вы уверенны, что name=Алмаз? Если судить сайту, то так зовут лошадь
2. Можете, пожалуйста, уточнить откуда были взяты номера телефонов. На сайте указан только один номер и он не совпадает ни с одним(+7 903 134-99-66)
ivanbranco (2025-11-20 09:44:08+00:00): Ciao, avevi duplicato il cimitero mappandolo come un enorme edificio, per questo motivo l'ho rimosso. L'editor aveva provato ad avvisarti dell'errore, ma tu hai accettato il suggerimeto aggiungendo layer=1, il che significa che l'edificio si trova sopra gli altri edifici (non possibile in quanto non esiste). Quando l'editor ti segnala un errore spesso c'è qualcosa che non va. Aggiungo inoltre che in Italia aggiungiamo i civici come punti, non come attributi delle aree.
ivanbranco (2025-11-20 09:44:53+00:00): Ovviamente volevo commentare il changeset revertato c:
rskedgell (2025-11-20 14:20:44+00:00): (Review requested)

Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for adding this.

For data consumers to understand what this is, including map renderers, you will need to add some other tags.

From your changeset comment, I would guess that it might be these:

amenity=social_facility
social_facility=outreach
social_facility:for=juvenile

You can have a look at the documentation for these tags on linked wiki. There may well be other tags which better describe the situation.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dsocial_facility

If you'd like any help with this, or anything else to do with OSM, please feel free to reply below.
Isabel Morris (2025-11-24 15:23:28+00:00): Thank you for this.

I agree the the following tag is most appropriate
amenity=social_facility
rskedgell (2025-11-24 15:40:26+00:00): Thanks - updated in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175072611
eggie (2025-11-20 11:20:12+00:00): Dag Serviceteam.. Je toegangsweg loopt nu dwars door het gebouw.
warnings:crossing_ways:building-highway 	2

Is dat dan de bedoeling?
Op de luchtfoto PDOK zie ik ook iets anders.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-11-20 11:22:06+00:00): Je edits.. 
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=174898758

Ik heb de weg teruggelegd.
MVG
eggie
AdrianLangtry (2025-11-20 11:34:38+00:00): Bad edit, not residential
eggie (2025-11-20 11:05:10+00:00): Dag Grasmaa1er,

foot=yes is default, maar toevoegen kan prima.
Waarom zou hier oneway=yes staan en op sommige stukken layer=-1

MVG
eggie
aaronq227 (2025-11-20 22:36:07+00:00): Hi Ankhbayar Ch,
I noticed you have been changing track ways to tertiary and secondary. Tertiary ways are typically used to “connect minor streets to more major roads” (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtertiary) and secondary ways are usually paved and support higher volumes of traffic (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dsecondary). Since these roads aren’t paved and lead to minor agricultural areas I changed them to unclassified and track. What do you think of that classification for these roads?
eggie (2025-11-20 11:13:35+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
JulesGabrielVerne (2025-11-25 11:45:56+00:00): Czy jesteś pewna że ta droga (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1066364255) jest RESIDENTAL?
cyganka (2025-11-25 13:52:38+00:00): Tak, chociaż brakuje utwardzenia. 
Mniej-więcej na środku jej długości stoi hydrant. Patrząc na północ od niego trwa budowa budynków mieszkalnych szeregowych. Natomiast jej zachodni koniec stanowi dodatkowy - gruntowy - dojazd do bramy domu przy ul. Lazurowej 5.
JulesGabrielVerne (2025-11-25 14:15:04+00:00): Dziwie się, bo jeszcze ok. 2 miesiące temu jak tam byłem to zdecydowanie była to droga polna o słabym "grade" -  raczej zwykła osobówka by miała tam trudności. Przejadę się i sprawdzę czy rzeczywiście się coś zmieniło.
JulesGabrielVerne (2025-11-29 17:30:03+00:00): Jestem zmuszony zrobic revert. Byłaś ostrzegana wiele razy żeby nie mapować coś czego nie ma, a Ty uparcie to robisz. Bedę Cie obserwował, bo niszczysz pracę wielu osób!
JulesGabrielVerne (2025-11-29 17:30:54+00:00): Byłem w terenie i zrobiłem całą dokumentacje i nic się nie zgadza z tym co narysowałaś
nevw (2025-11-20 13:04:03+00:00): Hi, you have added two defibrillators here. Was this intended or should a duplicate be deleted?
NeisBot (2025-11-20 10:39:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description
NeisBot (2025-11-20 10:39:41+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Painting company in Hillsboro"
NeisReview (2025-11-23 14:08:44+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/174917955
Ltrlg (2025-11-20 13:05:32+00:00): Sur quels critères vous basez-vous pour cette modification ?

D’une part, `highway=unclassified` est plutôt utilisé sur des voies hors agglomération, ce qui n’est pas le cas ici (même si j’admets que `highway=service` n’était pas parfait non plus).

D’autre part, comme on peut le voir ici : https://panoramax.openstreetmap.fr/?pic=80fa6690-e1e1-4e85-a08b-d53246c397dd, cette voie est fermée à la circulation générale, donc pourquoi la passer en `access=yes`+`motor_vehicle=yes` (qui en plus est redondant) ?
Ltrlg (2025-11-27 13:34:20+00:00): En l’absence de réponse, j’ai annulé la modification.
eggie (2025-11-20 11:17:41+00:00): Dag Jeroen,

access=yes hoeft niet op wegen. Ik denk zelfs dat het access=private is met emergency=yes
MVG
eggie
VRU_JeroenS (2025-11-20 11:43:09+00:00): Ah Top dat neem ik mee
eggie (2025-11-20 12:11:40+00:00): Je zou ook nog even in de wiki kunnen kijken mbt die paaltjes.
..flexible kun je zo overheen rijden.
We kennen ook nog bv removable en rising.
Groet..
eggie
VRU_JeroenS (2025-11-20 12:13:53+00:00): Die zag ik ook en heb ik inmiddels aangepast
NeisBot (2025-11-20 11:28:39+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly.

In total, I detected 9 potential crossings.

Problematic elements (top 3 by category):
- https://osm.org/way/801984244 | crossings=9

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=174901628
Vest-Agder-museet (2025-12-01 12:26:35+00:00): Hi, thank you for commenting. The (outdoor) museum area cross several public roads and are located in 3 different clusters. I have made some changes to try to give an exact layout of the museum area. Thank you.
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:44:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321625 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Ukraine