piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
johsin18 (2024-08-27 04:41:27+00:00): Hallo gueggeli,
die losen Enden der Trottoirs (z.B. Richtung Blotzheimerstrasse westlich) sollte man auch noch mit der Straße verbinden, oder besser sogar gleich löschen.  Wie du siehst, sind diese Sidewalks oft kontraproduktiv fürs Routing.  Ich würde sie nur mappen, wenn es eine klare baulich Trennung zur Strasse gibt,  und ansonsten eher löschen (und an der Strasse taggen).
Gruss, johsin18
gueggeli (2024-08-27 06:01:25+00:00): Hallo johsin18, merci für den Kommentar. Ich habe in einer Bearbeitungswut diverse neue Sidewalks erstellt und dann am Ende gemerkt, dass das wahrscheinlich gar nicht der beste Weg ist. Werde Trottoirs im weiteren Verlauf als Eigenschaft der Strassen anwenden und die separaten löschen. LG gueggeli
NorthCrab_upload (2024-08-24 20:30:57+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1310917762

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
neuhausr (2024-08-29 20:44:18+00:00): Hi, I noticed some large ways in this changeset that are untagged, north of Aniwa Lane. Maybe you were trying to create an area of some kind but didn't finish? If you'd be able to add tags or delete, that'd be great. Happy mapping!
EP_Repair (2024-10-16 02:35:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 157944578 where the changeset comment is: Reverting changesets due to incorrect railway speed limit edits by a now-deleted user. Without source verification and based on local reports of errors, we are restoring prior data. Ticket#2024101510000176
Katrin_H (2024-09-05 14:00:42+00:00): Liebe Elisa,
auf Mapillary sieht der Untergrund irgendwie deutlich schlechter aus. Ich wollte nur mal nachfragen, ob du dir da sicher bist :) Und dasselbe auch beim class:bicycle-Wert: 3 kommt mir für diesen Weg etwas viel vor. Aber du kannst das natürlich am besten beurteilen :)
Viele Grüße,
Katrin
#lgmaps
EP_Repair (2024-10-16 02:35:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 157944578 where the changeset comment is: Reverting changesets due to incorrect railway speed limit edits by a now-deleted user. Without source verification and based on local reports of errors, we are restoring prior data. Ticket#2024101510000176
busnotturno95 (2024-08-24 21:34:08+00:00): Separate dalla way le aree "terreno agricolo" e "prato" e riposizionate secondo immagine satellitare.
Aggiunte nuove fermate dell'autobus e completate le etichette di quelle già presenti.
Rimappate con maggior precisione due rotonde.
Spearfish7424 (2024-08-24 23:23:48+00:00): Hello, 

Please do not make fictional edits to OSM. 

This changeset has been reverted here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155717034 . 

Thank you.
AdamTRANSIT (2024-08-24 23:31:58+00:00): I'm really sorry I didn't know about fictional edits breaking the rules.

I appreciate you coming forward to inform me about this.
Spearfish7424 (2024-08-24 23:40:24+00:00): No worries! 

If ever you're unsure, this is a good starting point: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_We_Map . 

Happy mapping
Frank Peng (2024-08-24 21:44:26+00:00): See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history
CAM-Gerlach (2024-08-25 05:13:51+00:00): Thanks! And also ""Be brave in what you add but careful in what you delete", i.e. not removing valid, in-scope detail from the map when making changes (e.g. addr:* tags here), e.g. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_remove_tags_that_you_don't_understand
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/155715403
CAM-Gerlach (2024-08-25 05:20:22+00:00): Also left a comment on the original user's changeset, so this is brought to their attention to keep in mind for the future.
Katrin_H (2024-09-05 14:05:28+00:00): Liebe Elisa,
wo ist denn hier ein 240er Schild zu finden?
Liebe Grüße,
Katrin
#lgmaps
kitsee (2024-08-25 16:38:43+00:00): Hello Anarchy,
Can you please add a comment when make a changeset so others are able to tell what you've changed at a glance.
CAM-Gerlach (2024-08-25 05:23:08+00:00): Thanks. Would it make sense to fix the bad previous name tag to old_name=Mish Mish rather than removing it entirely? Or is it just _too_ old to be relevant now?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/155715498
pbnoxious (2024-09-04 10:16:04+00:00): Wer bestimmt was hier eingetragen werden "kann und darf"? Wir als Community bzw. die DWG wenn es Konflikte gibt.
Aber nicht du alleine, bitte höre mit deinen Edit-Wars auf.

Und nicht mal einen halben Tag auf eine Antwort zu warten ist auch nicht in Ordnung.
literan (2024-08-25 11:35:52+00:00): он уже есть!!
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17439059

не надо еще один рисовать, добавляйте в уже имеющийся
felipeeugenio (2024-08-25 13:13:18+00:00): Hola.
Las calles que están cortadas por el Parque La Antena no están conectadas con una sendero peatonal? porque los dejó todos cortados, y en als fotos satelitales se ven todos conectados. O se trata de un error?
Saludos
felipeeugenio (2024-08-25 13:15:31+00:00): No todos perdón, pero varios... y están cortados.
saludos
xanr223 (2024-08-27 16:27:36+00:00): Sí perdón, fue solo error mío
felipeeugenio (2024-08-27 16:45:48+00:00): Vale. No hay problema. 
Saludos
GretaMN (2024-09-06 09:16:34+00:00): Liebe:r ElisaMK,
bitte ergänze hier noch den class-bicycle Wert für ein vollständiges Taggig. Danke! :)
#lgmaps
felipeeugenio (2024-08-25 13:09:17+00:00): Hola. Sigue siendo un servicio técnico, pero ahora no de Samsung? eso es lo que se entiende con esta edición.
Porque se quedó el tag de servicio técnico, pero todo lo demás ya no está.
saludos
peipe (2024-08-25 15:36:24+00:00): Hola! los eliminé ahora en otra edición; pase por ahí y están construyendo un edificio
berndw (2024-08-25 06:58:47+00:00): Hallo Franz M

Bei Mapillary kann man eine eindeutige Beschilderung als gemeinsamer Fuß- und Radweg  (Vz 240) erkennen.

Wurde die Beschilderung zwischenzeitlich auf einen reinen Radweg (Vz 237) geändert?

Die Verwendung von hw=path mit zusätzlichen Eigenschaften für gemeinsamen Wege hat sich bewährt und sollte auch beachtet werden.
Franz M (2024-08-25 08:40:34+00:00): Hallo berndw, 
Danke! Das hätte ich genauer recherchieren sollen. Ich mach das gleich wieder rückgängig.
berndw (2024-08-25 09:05:24+00:00): 👍
tyfi (2024-08-24 23:03:04+00:00): The historic bridge wasn't even mapped.
tyfi (2024-08-24 23:13:51+00:00): Simply the fact that it's a state-owned road does not mean it should be upgraded.
mcliquid (2024-08-25 06:36:11+00:00): Hallo, ich ändere das so lange zurück, bis du auf meine Fragen antwortest.
Orblivion (2024-08-25 03:27:57+00:00): Ah great you were able to submit this.

I noticed that one of your streams looked off compared to LiDAR. I realized that it may be because it was connected to a node in the river that I adjusted AFTER you made the edit but BEFORE you saved it? I fixed it here:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1310957142/history/2
smithkm (2025-03-06 20:20:46+00:00): Why did you mark the ped bridge over the pat bay as "bicycle=designated"?  I saw it had signs requiring cyclists dismount.    The path running north along the pat bay from it to Vanalman is also marked bicycle=designated which seems wrong based on what I saw.  There were no signs marking it for cyclists and what was built was clearly designed for pedestrians.  It's too narrow for bicycles to pass  one another or pedestrians safely.
jeremy77 (2025-03-07 23:24:33+00:00): The signs appear to be new, or perhaps were vandalized (removed) when I was there last. I'll change the tag for the bridge to cyclists dismount. For the trails would you agree bicycle=yes is acceptable as there are no signs prohibiting cycling.
smithkm (2025-03-08 20:28:29+00:00): I suppose someone might argue that it's a "sidewalk" for the pat bay which would make it "bicycle=no" but that seems like a stretch. 

 I feel like there should be some way of marking these paths that don't prohibit, or even in some cases designate that cyclists are supposed to use them, but its a bad idea due to the nature of the actual built infrastructure.

bicycle=discouraged requires specific signage so it doesn't work.

Maybe measure the width from an air photo and tag that to provide a bit more context I think it was maybe 1.5 m or so?
mueschel (2024-08-25 09:47:16+00:00): Hi,
welcome to OSM!
ou used many tags here that are not in use in any other place. Please use only tags that are described in the OSM Wiki or are available in the presets of your editor.
This is necessary to make sure that every other user can understand the data.

To help keep the OSM database clean, I suggest to revert these edits, so that you can add them again with only proper tags.
pantufla (2024-10-10 17:44:17+00:00): Hola, me gustaría saber la razón de este cambio: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7122938191/history
mueschel (2024-08-25 09:48:31+00:00): Reminder:

You added many tags here that are not used in any other place. In OSM we have to use the tags that are defined in the wiki or available as presets in the editor - only these can be understood by other mappers and applications.


You're always welcome to ask in the forums in case you need help!
felipeeugenio (2024-08-25 12:40:38+00:00): Hola. Por favor para ver como realinear caminos interurbanos, usar las trazas de trava, que es mas o menos lo único que tenemos disponible para saber por donde realmente pasan los caminos. El trabajo está muy bueno, pero se basa en Esri, que es solo uno de los varios proveedores de imagenes satelitales, y todos tienen desplazamientos. Incluso entre las fotos del mismo proveedor en el tiempo hay desplazamientos.
Por favor ingresar al chat de la comunidad en Telegram en el link https://t.me/OSMcl para mayores explicaciones de cómo hacer eso.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-10 01:18:28+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164747276
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-09-09 12:23:46+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/111650374/history has maxspeed = 0 that was added in this edit
what maxspeed=0 is supposed to mean? If moving for vehicles (or some of them) is not allowed, then maybe one of access tags should be used and maxspeed=0 is not needed?
clay_c (2024-09-14 00:09:45+00:00): Hi snake21! Thanks for your contributions to railways on OpenStreetMap.

I noticed that in some of your railway changesets that switches have been moved farther away from the actual switch. For example, the node at [1] was originally parallel with the switch stand, and is now about 25 feet west of it towards the frog.

Could you please review your previous edits, and move all the switches back so that they're parallel with switch stands?

-Clay

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2146365782
snake21 (2024-09-24 22:47:37+00:00): Hi, the node you are referencing lines up with where the rails meet up in satellite images. Is that not the correct positioning?
clay_c (2024-09-25 01:29:32+00:00): If we're looking at the same imagery (Bing), I see a switch stand about 25 feet to the east—I've gone ahead and moved it to that position [1]. It's much easier to figure out the precise location where the rails "meet up" by finding the neighboring switch stands, rather than eyeballing the converging point of the rails.

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157060879
clay_c (2024-10-20 16:47:05+00:00): Hi again snake21,

It has been almost a month since you were made aware of this issue, and you seem to have moved on to mapping other things. Could you please resolve the improperly placed railroad switches, or revert your changesets?

-Clay
snake21 (2024-10-20 20:17:10+00:00): I will revert this changeset. Sorry for the delay in responding
snake21 (2024-10-20 20:19:18+00:00): Do you know if there is a way to revert the entire changeset with one click? or is it more granular of a process
clay_c (2024-10-20 21:13:48+00:00): https://revert.monicz.dev/ is an easy way to revert changesets.

Were there any tagging changes in these changesets, or was it purely adjusting the geometry of things? I'd hate to see your other contributions get undone in the process. If we need to do a partial revert, I'm happy to handle it.
clay_c (2024-11-06 23:14:52+00:00): Changeset reverted partially here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158836598
snake21 (2024-11-13 03:31:08+00:00): Thank you. Sorry for confusing things! Yeah, it was geometry
LockOnGuy (2024-08-27 08:46:59+00:00): Can you explain what this changeset is?    
What did you delete? What did you revert and why?   
Regards.
Friendly_Ghost (2024-08-28 05:53:16+00:00): They keep creating sockpuppet accounts to turn half of Gaza into landuse=military. The DWG is already involved.
LockOnGuy (2024-08-28 05:59:54+00:00): So why deleting features that’s on the ground?     
I mean I’m ok with deleting temporary objects, but those features gonna be like a 1 year old features on the ground, and those lines has history behind it for tens of years. And the Israeli government stated that those military areas will be buffer zones to stay, so it’s definitely not a temporary objects.      
Also, the IDF stated days ago that the military campaign has ended, so it’s not an active campaign area anymore.      
Any other reason for the deletion?
Friendly_Ghost (2024-08-28 06:38:39+00:00): I'm not getting into the politics of it. Go talk to the Israeli / Gaza community or the DWG.
LockOnGuy (2024-08-28 06:42:37+00:00): You are the one who deleted it, please provide a reason for the deletion.     
Regards.
Friendly_Ghost (2024-08-28 06:45:21+00:00): All of it is likely to change in the short term aftermath of the conflict. That is the reason.
LockOnGuy (2024-08-28 06:56:29+00:00): *likely* is not a good reason. You think it *might* change, others think it would not.     
We don’t delete objects based on assumptions, if the stocks of a business is crashing, we shall not delete the business from OSM because it might be out of business and closed.      
Since those features are not temporary and to stay (based on the statement of the Israeli government who administered the area) and also those features had been for almost a year on the ground.        
      
Any other reasons or arguments?      
     
And are you local? If not, did you contact the local communities first before the deletion?      
     
Regards.
Friendly_Ghost (2024-08-28 07:01:43+00:00): I'm not in the mood to reply to all of that now. Convince the DWG that it should be mapped now and I'll let it be.
LockOnGuy (2024-08-28 07:07:46+00:00): Dear mapper, please don't be stubborn, and if it's not the right time for you to discuss, no problem, you can respond later, but when I ask you a question like are you a local mapper? or have you discussed this with the local community first? the least you can do is answer these simple questions. Responding in this way is unprofessional, not cooperative, and not a way to communicate with other mappers.     
I will be waiting for you to answer those simple questions.     
Regards.
GeeMaps! (2024-08-25 03:41:35+00:00): Thanks for spotting them!
TrickyFoxy (2024-08-25 04:35:19+00:00): It seems to remove the mapping of _natural_ objects that were visible before the conflict is too much
SomeoneElse (2024-08-25 11:11:58+00:00): @TrickyFoxy https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1308852272/history was/is pretty obviously a temporary structure.  No source was given in the changeset that added it, so it's really not verifiable.
The natural objects changed seem to be https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1308852277/history and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/39253573 .  The change involved adding one and adding an "intermittent" tag to the other.  Given the nature of the water here, neither of those are likely fixed either.
SomeoneElse (2024-08-25 11:12:49+00:00): The user adding these features has been asked to not map temporary ones at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16614 already.
TrickyFoxy (2024-08-25 11:21:29+00:00): I'm not arguing about temporary bridges. But what about the roads? 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1308852275
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1308852273
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1308852273
Friendly_Ghost (2024-08-25 11:54:49+00:00): The only reason these tracks were mapped was because they linked the pontoon to the road network.
TrickyFoxy (2024-08-25 12:03:55+00:00): This is not a reason to delete valid roads that are visible in the images before the conflict and will not disappear after it. Strictly speaking in this changeset only one point refers to the pontoon bridge.

Otherwise, according to this logic, we should prohibit all edits in this area
Friendly_Ghost (2024-08-25 18:04:16+00:00): Sounds good to me. Let people map something away from the front lines. OSM doesn't need to play a role in the information war that surrounds this (or any other) military conflict. 

But if you really must, I won't stop you from putting those tracks back on the map.
bkabf271 (2024-08-27 10:55:20+00:00): 도봉차랑사업소 이름에 서울교통공사 문구를 넣지 않아도 됩니다. 왜냐하면 operator(운영 주체)에 서울교통공사가 있기 때문입니다.
꼬물_Yu (2024-09-05 05:11:04+00:00): 알려주셔서 감사드립니다!
편집에 있어서 유의하도록 하겠습니다
clay_c (2024-11-06 23:24:09+00:00): Changeset partially reverted here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158836625
emersonveenstra (2024-08-27 17:40:33+00:00): Hi there,

Could you explain more about what this is? Thanks
Hungerburg (2024-08-25 18:09:21+00:00): Hallo Stefanie, die Plansch Bar ist im Viaduktbogen 69, die Adresse Viaduktbogen 68 ist zehn Meter südöstlich davon. Es gibt in Innsbruck auch keine Straße "Viaduktbögen".

Allerdings hat Organic maps Fehler beim Auflösen von Adressen ohne Straßennamen. Man arbeitet angeblich daran. Übrigens gibt es in Ibk auch keine Straße mit Namen "Viaduktbogen" (ohne ö).
Stefanie Castillo (2024-08-27 14:34:58+00:00): Die Plansch Bar ist in der Viaduktbögen  drinnen. Aber ok

https://innsbruck-erinnert.at/die-boegen/
Sylvain M (2026-07-30 13:57:33+00:00): There doesn’t seem to be any water or depth at this site. Are you sure it’s a cliff diving site? (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dcliff_diving)

Could it be a base jumping site instead? (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dbase)
Woytekwo (2025-06-04 12:49:47+00:00): To nie jest wejście do sztolni tylko ujęcie wody z podziemnym zbiornikiem wodociągowym.
eggie (2024-08-25 08:30:33+00:00): Je bedoeling is natuurlijk goed, maar probeer eens precies te tekeken. Dus geen water over land. Kijk naar de luchtfoto dan zie je wat ik bedoel. 
De taluds langs het water is land en geen water.
Het gaat ook om de kwaliteit en niet of het vandaag afkomt.
MVG
eggie
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-21 07:38:56+00:00): Hello!

You used
surface=niet-bestraat2
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1310992238/history

Have you maybe meant
surface=unpaved
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
EP_Repair (2024-10-16 02:35:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 157944578 where the changeset comment is: Reverting changesets due to incorrect railway speed limit edits by a now-deleted user. Without source verification and based on local reports of errors, we are restoring prior data. Ticket#2024101510000176
felipeeugenio (2024-08-25 12:25:56+00:00): Hola. A qué se deben las eliminaciones de elementos?. El terreno existe y además borró toda una línea de interpolación de numeración.
Saludos
eggie (2024-08-25 08:04:53+00:00): Dag Niels.. Kijk eens naar de luchtfoto.
Dat is toch echt anders.
Kijk je nog even?

MVG
eggie
felipeeugenio (2024-08-25 12:31:11+00:00): Hola. Por favor cuidado con lo que borra.
saludos
martianfreeloader (2024-12-05 17:46:51+00:00): Hi,

You've mapped footway and cycleway separately, but there is no physical barrier between them. 

However, when things are not physically separated, we map them as only one way in OSM.
soshial (2024-12-05 20:13:23+00:00): Hi Martin! Thank you for your concern, I do know about this rule. If you check out those cycleways, those are separated by bushes/small greenery. Hence those are mapped accordingly :)
martianfreeloader (2024-12-06 19:03:47+00:00): Ah great! I've seen this mapped wrong many times, so I have become suspicious.

Thanks for the quick reply!
jbcharron (2024-08-26 19:21:13+00:00): Bonsoir Yannick,
Le nom d'un objet est destiné a contenir son nom et non sa description. Il existe d'autres attributs pour décrire le fait que c'est une sculpture.
Bonne soirée
b-holdet (2024-08-25 11:08:04+00:00): Do you know if the shelter has the name "Shelter"

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12135371764
Max-Kritic (2024-08-25 16:06:25+00:00): Na name
b-holdet (2024-08-25 18:28:39+00:00): Sorry I dont understand:

You have created shelters with this tag:
name=Shelter

Are you sure all shelters has the name "Shelter"

--DeepL Translate--
Désolé, je ne comprends pas :

Vous avez créé des abris avec cette balise :
name=Shelter

Etes-vous sûr que tous les abris ont le nom « Shelter » ?
Money Moustache (2024-11-26 23:33:33+00:00): Bonjour Marival,

Il semble que la rue https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/38237501 a été supprimée par ce jeu de modifications. Cela était-il intentionnel ? Il semble que ce soit une erreur...

MM
Marival (2024-11-27 09:15:04+00:00): Bonjour Money Moustache,
Oui c'est bien une modification involontaire faites pendant nos vacances dans cette belle région (à Barret sur Méouge), j'ai restauré. 
Au plaisir, Merci
Money Moustache (2024-11-28 21:30:00+00:00): Merci ! Je suis heureux que vous ayez passé de bonnes vacances !
Andrea Musuruane (2024-09-02 13:41:46+00:00): Ciao. Temo di non aver capito cosa rappresentano i 3 addr:floor=G associati a 3 POI. Ciao, Andrea
Andrea Musuruane (2024-09-02 13:51:00+00:00): Tra l'altro vedo che nei hai inseriti proprio tanti: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1Qzj Magari è un problema in Every Door?
Michael Montani (2024-09-03 12:37:59+00:00): Ciao Andrea, scusa se ti rispondo solo ora. Si ho notato ed ero arrivato alla stessa conclusione. Sembrerebbe che quando seleziono l'opzione prestabilita "0" per level=* su EveryDoor, automaticamente compili level=0 che è corretto e addr:floor=G che sarebbe sostanzialmente la lettera con il quale comunemente ci si riferisce a quel piano (piano terra in Inglese è Ground floor, ma da noi negli ascensori è T).
Procederò a fare una revisita massiva di tutti i miei edit addr:floor=G che in Italia penso raramente si applichi, mentre ero intenzionato solo ad aggiungere level=0
Grazie mille per la notifica!
Andrea Musuruane (2024-09-07 16:04:38+00:00): Ho aperto il seguente bug: https://github.com/Zverik/every_door/issues/777 Sentiti libero di commentare :-) Ciao, Andrea
EP_Repair (2024-10-16 02:35:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 157944578 where the changeset comment is: Reverting changesets due to incorrect railway speed limit edits by a now-deleted user. Without source verification and based on local reports of errors, we are restoring prior data. Ticket#2024101510000176
mga_geo (2024-08-27 05:15:01+00:00): Bonjour,
Attention, avec l'éditeur iD il est difficile de mettre dans l'ordre les différentes ways d'une relation route=bus.
Il serait préférable d'utiliser JOSM.
Marc
PS : je viens de corriger pour  r1262692,r6565008
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-10 01:18:29+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164747276