piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
gscholz (2024-06-28 06:49:14+00:00): Hi Jérémie,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=6.77908&lat=45.22738&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=152953973

As you may know, this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps. Can you please fix this?

You may also like to educate yourself about how to map hiking routes properly:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route%3Dhiking

Kind regards
Guido
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-18 08:38:25+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11994826563/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
HBanu (2024-06-20 19:06:22+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152954391
HBanu (2024-06-20 19:02:43+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152954468
HBanu (2024-06-20 19:00:12+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152954669
HBanu (2024-06-20 19:01:50+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152954669
HBanu (2024-06-20 18:59:34+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152954693
HBanu (2024-06-20 18:59:07+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152954730
HBanu (2024-06-20 18:58:02+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152954760
HBanu (2024-06-20 18:38:30+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152954882
HBanu (2024-06-20 18:35:42+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152954954
Taya_S (2024-06-20 16:32:51+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152955161
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-06-20 17:33:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152958383 where the changeset comment is: Revert vandalism by repeat offender.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16269
HBanu (2024-06-20 18:32:41+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152955062
HBanu (2024-06-20 18:30:11+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152955079
SomeoneElse (2024-06-20 17:12:45+00:00): Great - thanks!
SomeoneElse (2024-06-24 15:19:37+00:00): For info - a Cambridge local on Discord reckons that this is sensible too.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-06-20 17:33:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152958383 where the changeset comment is: Revert vandalism by repeat offender.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16269
Taya_S (2024-06-20 16:50:24+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152956119
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-06-20 17:33:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152958383 where the changeset comment is: Revert vandalism by repeat offender.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16269
Taya_S (2024-06-20 16:56:23+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152956406
Taya_S (2024-06-20 17:00:24+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152956616
Taya_S (2024-06-20 17:00:34+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152956628
Taya_S (2024-06-20 17:03:09+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152956776
rskedgell (2024-06-30 19:41:41+00:00): You appear to have tagged several section of roads as foot=no in response to a StreetComplete task asking "Are pedestrians forbidden to walk on this road here?"

I'm trying to find any evidence in Bing Streetside imagery that there really is a (signed) pedestrian prohibition in any of these locations. I cannot see any TSRGD diagram 625.1 "pedestrians prohibited" signs on the imagery, so do not believe that a prohibition exists. Is this a new signed restriction created by a traffic order more recent than the Bing streetside imagery?

The wiki states that access tags reflect legal access. Subjective opinions about whether it would be pleasant, a good idea, safe, etc. for a particular transport mode are not relevant to legal access.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:foot

As real pedestrian prohibitions on public roads other than those tagged as highway=motorway or motorroad=yes in the UK are quite rare and are always signed, this quest is probably better left disabled.
gfoswellborreth (2024-07-01 18:22:28+00:00): HI rskedgell,

You're right, I've misunderstood this tag. I'll revert both this and 152857184, although a partial revert has already been done by another mapper.

-G
rskedgell (2024-07-01 18:48:48+00:00): Many thanks.
Taya_S (2024-06-20 17:25:27+00:00): Thank you for redacting this. The user also added some personal information in this changeset: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152956014
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/51477/history/2012
SomeoneElse (2024-06-20 17:46:42+00:00): Done
Minh Nguyen (2024-07-10 18:29:11+00:00): Fantastic detail here! By the way, I think this is all one building structurally, so it would be more correct to remove the building tag from each of these areas and surround them all with a single building area that connects to all the same nodes along the outer walls. Unfortunately, this will cause the inner walls to go missing from the default Standard layer, but then you can add more details for indoor renderers like indoor= and OpenLevelUp – particularly handy for both Jungle Jim’s locations.
NeisBot (2024-06-20 17:22:25+00:00): Hi Antk33, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/node/11994931556

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-20 17:44:15+00:00): Thanks for your mapped beach.
Looks good!

#HappyMapping
woodpeck (2024-06-20 17:32:05+00:00): Dear Lena_OpenStreetMap, the "changeset comment" that you are asked to supply on upload is intended as a valuable piece of information for other human beings reviewing your contributions. It should be human-readable. A simple message like "mapped buildings in CITYNAME" is a million times more useful than all the "hash tags" - only a tiny minority of OSM contributors would even know what " #hotosm-project-17023 #tm-project #MissingMaps # Dominican republic #NLRC #redcross #rodekruis # IHE20240620 #sidsMapathon #AnteaAntwerp" is supposed to mean!
Dimitar155 (2024-06-20 19:01:33+00:00): Здравейте Zuhie,

Може ли да споделите как точно добавяте границите? В таговете на промяната е отразено, че използвате сателитни снимки на Bing и уеб редактора, но не се споменава какъв е източника на самите данни, нито как ги сравнявате (визуално или по друг начин).

Поздрави,
Митко
Zuchie (2024-06-21 03:48:18+00:00): Здравей Митко,

Използвам картата направена от Боян Юруков (https://yurukov.net/blog/2015/zemlishta/), като съм я изтеглил в geojson формат и си я визуализирам в geojson viewer. 

Самата карта не е 100% точна, но е доста приблизителна. Понякога границите ся ясно начертани и в този случай просто ги следвам. Понякога границите са малко неясни, затова се опитвам да следвам границата по географски обекти (гори, реки, полета, ридове итн).

По-добра карта не съм намирал за описване на землищата на ниво 8 в OSM. Преди слагах линк към въпросния блог в изтониците, но явно съм забравил да го добавя в последните няколко редакции които съм правил. Извинявам се за което.

Поздрави, 
Злати
Dimitar155 (2024-06-21 06:12:32+00:00): Благодаря за отговора! Има и официални данни във форума (https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/topic/92992/12), но могат да се отворят в само в JOSM, а тази програма не е една от най-интуитивните. Другият проблем е че са затворени линии и трябва да ги режеш, да правиш релации, да триеш 20 измислени тага...
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-06-20 17:33:33+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 152953431, 152953586, 152954884, 152955044, 152955269, 152956014, 152956348, 152956442, 152956512, 152956672.
pavvv (2024-06-20 18:13:01+00:00): nie tak się to pisze…
Supaplex (2025-04-09 09:42:09+00:00): 請問這段有獨立的單車道嗎？
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/970757512

如果不是，則宜將經過的一般道路加到單車關聯
tntchn (2025-04-12 20:30:07+00:00): @Supaplex 沒有，而且嘉藥前面也沒有人行道，這個自行車路線到這裡就是一般馬路而已

https://osm.org/way/767431628
Kays (2024-06-23 06:37:44+00:00): Concerning way 261284815: Wouldn’t landuse=meadow meadow=wildflower be more appropriate?
jengelh (2024-06-23 07:01:20+00:00): well why would it?
martien-176 (2024-07-17 13:23:55+00:00): Hi,  thanks for mapping.

The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the fact that overhanging trees can distort the outline of a rectangular building.

Also one building is sharing a node with a highway.

Thanks so much for your contribution, Martien, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152959251
silversurfer83 (2024-06-20 19:58:37+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap :)

thank you for contributing to the database.

I'd like to introduce you to our wiki where we collect a whole lot of information for all kinds of things OSM. Especially some guidelines that help everyone to work together more effectively, two of which are

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

in case of questions don't hesitate to contact the community

happy mapping 

silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152959776
Udarian (2024-06-21 00:05:38+00:00): A few questions:

First of all, I was wondering why you changed the crossings from crossing=uncontrolled to crossing=marked since uncontrolled is the standard tagging for marked crossings these days. from what I can tell the crossing ways and nodes were already tagged correctly. 

Second of all if you look at the latest imagery (Esri World Imagery) the crossing:markings on these ways is ladder not zebra and that is what it was tagged as before this commit so I am wondering why you made those changes.

Happy mapping,
Udar
ryleeisosm (2024-06-21 00:09:56+00:00): Hi sorry I realized I was on the wrong project for this so I just started mapping and then stopped so let me fix this
flex16 (2024-06-20 18:58:49+00:00): Ich kann nicht erkennen, dass daran was falsch war.
Fabian007 (2024-06-22 17:32:52+00:00): Hallo Flex16,

Danke, für deine Nachricht!

Oh, ok, heißt das, dass ich hier was verbessern muss, oder nicht?

Danke, und ein schönes Restwochenende, wünsche ich dir noch!

MFG Fabianbuecheler
Fabian007 (2024-06-22 17:33:25+00:00): 

Hallo Flex16,

Danke, für deine Nachricht!

Oh, ok, heißt das, dass ich hier was verbessern muss, oder nicht?

Danke, und ein schönes Restwochenende, wünsche ich dir noch!

MFG Fabianbuecheler
flex16 (2024-06-22 17:47:01+00:00): Hallo Fabianbuecheler,

du brauchst es nicht zwingend verbessern, da die beiden Angaben für die Öffnungszeiten ja äquivalent sind. Jedoch war die Lesbarkeit vorher etwas besser.

Kennst du schon folgende Website:
https://projets.pavie.info/yohours/

Hier kannst du ziemlich einfach Öffnungszeiten eingeben und die Seite gibt es dir dann im OSM Format heraus.

Viele Grüße
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-06-20 18:35:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152961099 where the changeset comment is: Revert vandalism by repeat offender.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16272
arkarjun (2024-06-27 17:50:35+00:00): Thank you for mapping #Reviewed_Good #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152960673
arkarjun (2024-06-27 17:47:02+00:00): Thank you for mapping #Reviewed_Good #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152960830
arkarjun (2024-06-27 17:43:11+00:00): Thank you for mapping #Reviewed_Good #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152960849
arkarjun (2024-06-27 17:43:19+00:00): Thank you for mapping #Reviewed_Good #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152960849
hatul (2024-10-27 22:22:11+00:00): בבקשה לא להמציא שמות לנחלים. המפה צריכה להציג שמות אמיתיים ולא שמות מומצאים.
NeisReview (2025-04-01 17:22:15+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164341323
arkarjun (2024-06-27 17:43:16+00:00): Thank you for mapping #Reviewed_Good #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152960883
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-06-20 18:35:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152961099 where the changeset comment is: Revert vandalism by repeat offender.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16272
AayushChand123 (2024-06-20 19:43:57+00:00): the feature in this changeset should be on the other side of road based on mapillary images.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152960941
AayushChand123 (2024-06-20 19:44:35+00:00): The feature in this changeset should be on the other side of road based on mapillary images.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152960973
mandira bomjan (2024-06-25 08:12:48+00:00): Thank you for reviewing the changeset and for pointing out that the feature should be on the other side of the road based on the Mapillary images. I appreciate your attention to detail. I will update the changeset accordingly to ensure it accurately reflects the correct positioning. Thanks again for your valuable feedback!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152960973
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-06-20 18:35:25+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 152960631, 152960897.
Javierpf (2024-07-22 14:45:06+00:00): Hi Darkleith and thank you for contributing :-)
 have noticed that you used aeroway=hanger or building=hangar, not in this but in other changes, which are exclusively related to aeroplanes or aero industry for storage or building planes or parts for them.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:aeroway%3Dhangar
I think you tried to set an industrial or commercial shelter or setup to make or storage. In that case, i suggest choosing builing=yes or building=commercial and man_made=works
Let me know any doubt
Thanks 
Javier
eggie (2024-07-03 12:17:12+00:00): This is right?
AndersAndersson (2024-06-20 22:00:37+00:00): Hej!
Vad betyder Stv? Är det en förkortning bör den skrivas ut.
Hashmush (2024-06-21 18:49:36+00:00): Plockade lite slarvigt direkt från NVDB och antog att det va en vedertagen förkortning jag inte kände till.

Med andra ord, jag vet inte. Du får gärna plocka bort det om du vill. Tror inte jag kommer ha möjlighet den närmsta tiden.
AndersAndersson (2024-06-21 22:02:33+00:00): Efter jag skrev kommentaren  kom jag på att det nog står för stickväg. Jag ändrar till det.

Glad midsommar!
citrula (2024-06-21 02:21:24+00:00): You deleted a lot of roads in this changeset - did you mean to do that?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152962791
Melissa Calkins (2024-06-22 04:20:58+00:00): Yes, I did. A majority of the ones I deleted were running through fields that there wasn't any roads any longer. I route the school buses for Canyon ISD and I have driven all over Randall Co so I am just trying to clean up the maps in my area so my routing software will route the buses properly.  Thanks for checking in on me.
citrula (2024-06-23 01:31:24+00:00): Some of the roads you deleted look like they are probably closer to private service roads/driveways or land-access roads - you can change the highway classification rather than deleting them. Happy to explain further if you need, and thank you for your contributions!
Luzandro (2025-05-14 10:39:03+00:00): Hallo,

du hast hier beim Brunnenweg width=1 hinzugefügt, was für eine Straße viel zu schmal ist

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30276322/
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152962978
Lerinc (2025-05-14 11:35:41+00:00): width mit dem Wert "1" ist hier vermutlich falsch eingetragen oder war ein Tippfehler. Gerne ändern.
joost schouppe (2025-04-03 09:09:18+00:00): Hey Tom,
Je hebt deze dag de polygoon van de residential area van Londerzeel wel héél complex gemaakt. In de web editor is het natuurlijk nogal lastig om zo'n grote polygoon in stukken te kappen, maar als je de outline knipt, maakt ID er wel een relatie van, en dan ben je ook flexibeler. Vraag gerust om hulp als je dit soort zaken tegenkomt.
Langlaeufer (2024-06-21 09:16:40+00:00): Hallo Hoedeken,
danke für den neuen Radweg. Ist der bereits mit blauen Rad/Gehwegzeichen beschildert und damib benutzungspflichtig? Wenn ja, ist er auch in beide Richtungen beschildert?

Ich hab noch die die Einträge cycleway/sidwalk an der Straße angepasst. (die mussten von no auf separate geändert werden.)
Grüße Langläufer
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152964215
Hoedeken (2024-06-22 11:59:32+00:00): Hallo Langlaeufer,
ja, es sind blaue Schilder Vz 240 für beide Richtungen aufgestellt.
Grüße
Hoedeken
Langlaeufer (2024-06-23 14:39:26+00:00): Danke dir, hab es eingetragen
NicaTopo (2024-06-21 21:01:19+00:00): Hi Corey,

Please reduce the building sizes to match exactly the aerial imagery and square building out.

Thank you.
PizzaTreeIsland (2024-06-23 08:42:28+00:00): Привет, большое спасибо за внесение деревьев! Пожалуйста, обрати внимание, что ряды деревьев должны быть обозначены как "natural=tree_row", а не "natural=tree". Я уже это изменил.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-06-20 20:20:20+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1294586615

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2024-06-20 20:30:29+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11997728718

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Myazyk (2024-06-22 18:43:59+00:00): Вважаю, що потрібно вказувати точну висоту, а приблизні дані можуть бути спотворені і з часом піти по різних дописах та статтях, як істинні
Shyshka (2024-06-22 21:00:22+00:00): Погоджуюсь, але не знаю, де взяти точні
Myazyk (2024-06-23 11:36:35+00:00): Тоді не вказувати висоти
NorthCrab_upload (2024-06-20 20:40:23+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie powinna zawierać przedrostka.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1294591249

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2024-06-20 20:50:31+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11997728718
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1026210159

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Leo Slager (2024-06-20 22:49:12+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
NorthCrab_upload (2024-06-20 20:50:32+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11997810820
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11997810819
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1026210145
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1026210158

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Baloo Uriza (2024-06-20 21:33:03+00:00): Might not want to abbreviate on street names.  Also not sure most of these should be tertiary?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152966307
Feskil (2024-07-08 21:13:59+00:00): Fakt, że jest to ośrodek zamknięty, należący do m. Poznania, nie świadczy o tym, że należy zmienić tag użytkowania na commercial. Ośrodek spełnia funkcję rekreacyjną, zarówno w mpzp jak i de facto.
SeviyMan (2024-06-21 20:38:03+00:00): зачем дуболи адресов наплодили......
как минимум у https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/496205867, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1286291078, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/336236133
Руслан Т (2024-06-21 20:45:40+00:00): Здравствуйте! Удивительно, как они прошли - обычно все дубли убираю при отправке. Вижу уже убрали, спасибо.
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-21 04:36:21+00:00): Hi kupavskydima, welcome to OSM and thanks for your contributions!

I noticed something interesting in your recent edits, specifically with the names at this location:
https://osm.org/node/11997675369

Some of the names appear a bit unusual. Could you share a bit about your sources for these names?

Thanks.