piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Gregory Peony (2025-07-25 22:43:33+00:00): Hi, thank you for your contributions. The footpritns you added here represent those visible in imagery but are not as accurate as they could be. After mapping buildings, please remember to square their corners. Most buildings have square corners because that's easy to build. Unless the building is clearly a different shape then it's best to assume that the corners should be squared. In the iD Editor, use the `Q` key to square the corners. This [video about squaring features](https://youtu.be/Xs5wX592E1o) has more information and a guide. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166859694
Gregory Peony (2025-07-12 17:37:28+00:00): Vakid and quite accurate footprint. Please remember to square footprints when appropriate.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166859766
Gregory Peony (2025-07-25 22:52:15+00:00): Hi, thank you for your contribution. Generally you identified buildings in the imagery and appropriately squared them. Generally they appear oversized. When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom in so that you can see the outline of the building and mark the corners carefully. Exclude shadows and yards when tracing the footprint.  Keep in mind that you are looking at the roofs of buildings, but mapping their footprints. Depending on how the scene is lit, pitched roofs may have light and dark sections that belong to one building. Generally pitched roofs overhang the walls of a building, so a footprint slightly smaller than the roof is accurate. You can scale selected features in ID with shift+(-/+), or JOSM with ctrl.+alt+Lclick & drag. Take care to make contributions that others can build upon.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166859832
Mannivu (2025-05-28 09:00:02+00:00): Ciao. Il tag access=no indica che l'accesso è vietato a chiunque e, in generale, andrebbe evitato. Se l'accesso è difficoltoso meglio indicare le limitazioni di larghezza e di percorribilità.
Gregory Peony (2025-07-13 01:22:49+00:00): The footprint I flagged envelopes two buildings. It's easier to see this in bing.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166859991
Gregory Peony (2025-07-26 00:22:57+00:00): These are fairly well mapped footpritns but the two I flagged are out of position you can move selected features in ID by pressing m.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166860102
Gregory Peony (2025-07-11 22:15:36+00:00): The vast majority of footprints are accurate here, but the round ones are not appropriately shaped. Generally these footprtins are inaccurate becasue you have included the building's shadow in its footprint. Accurate footpritns lead to better population estimates and prevent data overlap issues. Building footprints can generally be mapped slightly smaller than the roofs you see in imagery.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166860352
Gregory Peony (2025-07-12 00:08:09+00:00): You identified buildings in the imagery and appropriately squared them. The ones I flagged are oversized and sometimes envelope multiple buildings.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166860560
Gregory Peony (2025-07-26 21:57:52+00:00): You duplicated data when uploading these footprints. Beware of editing conflicts with other contributors when participating in organised mapping activities. Generally you identified buildings in the imagery but the footprints you mapped are inaccurate. When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom in so that you can see the outline of the building and mark the corners carefully. Exclude shadows and yards when tracing the footprint. I flagged several which envelope multiple buidings. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166860667
Gregory Peony (2025-07-12 00:09:07+00:00): The footprint I flagged should be L shaped.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166860694
Gregory Peony (2025-07-12 01:02:34+00:00): It's good that you're using multiple sources to aid your interpretation; I recommend that you offset the imagery source before digitising to keep features correctly aligned with one another. In this case the buildings are several meters West of where they should be if they were aligned to ESRI as per the instructions.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166860909
Gregory Peony (2025-07-06 02:30:35+00:00): Try to see if a regular shape will accurately represent the building before going for more complex geometry. I flagged a couple of buildings that stand out to me as well mapped. Thank you!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166861178
A67-A67 (2025-06-06 12:36:56+00:00): Hi,
Please check if the suggested tags in the iD editor are correct. 
You've incorrectly changed the brand Jumbo Foodmarkt to just Jumbo, while this is a Jumbo Foodmarkt.
wanlwanflawfnalwfn (2025-06-06 12:50:53+00:00): Oke dankje, ik dacht dat Jumbo Foodmarkt een incorrecte/onofficiele tag was omdat OSM dit aangaf. Maar bedankt, ik zal er op letten
Gregory Peony (2025-07-26 02:00:22+00:00): Most of these footpritns represent buildings in the imagery but are generally inaccuarate and share nodes with highways. Please do not snap the corners of the buildings to other buildings or features such as roads and paths. In the iD Editor, hold down the `Alt` key to keep nodes from snapping to other objects and accidentally connecting. This [video about connected nodes](https://youtu.be/ltn1VOiq5_0) has more information and a guide. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166861772
user_5359 (2025-05-29 15:12:21+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/12870420583. What is the mean of the the tags
level = 市保 (Municipal Protection)
name = 静观亭摩崖石刻群 (Jingguan Pavilion Cliff Carvings)
person = 吴宗慈 (Wu Zongci)
person2 = 许世英 (Xu Shiying)
topic = 名人轶事 (Celebrity Anecdotes)
type = 摩崖石刻 (Cliff Carvings)

type is reserved keyword for a relation. 
Please have a look on https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dmemorial, https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dattraction.
karr4s (2025-07-12 11:50:20+00:00): Bonjour,
Ce SIRET (39998309700011) a été ajouté à 14 laboratoires de la région parisienne alors qu'il correspond à un laboratoire situé à Vaires-sur-Marne.

Les SIRET corrects déjà renseignés semblent avoir été écrasés pour certains d’entre-deux, comme pour ce laboratoire (SIRET correcte : 39998309700078).

Pouvez-vous corriger cette erreur ? Merci d'avance.
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2025-07-15 07:43:09+00:00): Bonjour,

Merci pour votre alerte, des corrections ont été apportées

Cordialement,
L'Equipe DB
Gregory Peony (2025-07-11 22:56:31+00:00): The Western Footprint is well mapped more like this in future please. Check Changeset: 168816457 to see how I mapped these buildings.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166863202
aixbrick (2025-05-28 17:24:50+00:00): "[...] bis Ende 2025" widerspricht der Pressemeldung von heute: https://www.dueren.de/de/verwaltung-politik/stadtverwaltung/presse/pressemitteilung/dechant-bohnekamp-strae-abschluss-der-kanalbaumanahme-rueckt-naeher.
aixbrick (2025-05-28 17:49:24+00:00): Bitte auch einmal https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dconstruction lesen, wann "highway=construction" verwendet werden soll.
Gregory Peony (2025-07-27 01:55:54+00:00): Hi Anaé, generally you are identifying buildings in the imagery but the footprints I flagged envelope multiple buildings. Each footprint should represent one builsing. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166863615
Gregory Peony (2025-06-04 03:11:08+00:00): all footprints valid and appropriately shaped but could be more accurate in size.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166864003
Frans S (2025-06-01 12:35:21+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
You oversized the buildings you map
F.i  a buildings with a dia of 10 mtr has been mapped as a building of 30 mtr dia.
Be keen on that please.
Gregory Peony (2025-06-04 03:48:50+00:00): You identified buildings visible in the imagery and appropriately shaped them but they are generally too large. Take more care when placing the nodes and/or use the shift+(-/+) shortcut to scale features after tagging and shaping them. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166864269
Antoinesk8 (2025-06-04 12:22:18+00:00): Hello Zuniga,

Thank you for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!

I noticed that you've added several entrances using the tag access=permit, which is quite uncommon. In most cases, access=private would be more appropriate for restricted entrances.

Also, some of the doors seem to be positioned at the very corners of buildings, which looks a bit unusual. Could you double-check whether that’s correct, or if they might need to be adjusted?

One more suggestion: when writing changeset comments, it's best to use either the local language of the area you're mapping or English, to help others better understand your edits.

Thanks again for your work, and feel free to reach out if you have any questions!

Best regards,
Gregory Peony (2025-07-06 02:23:37+00:00): well done. You improved the geometry of building footprnits, though they're not as accurate as they could be. Please map them a little smaller than the roof.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166864435
Frans S (2025-06-01 08:36:43+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please map in according to the guidelines.
These are mainly round huts.
Just map them as a round hut.
Tagging: building is yes. Nothing else.
Best regards
Frans S (2025-05-28 13:29:49+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Most buildings here are round huts.
Map them accordingly, please,
Check this webpage please,
https://learnosm.org/en/hot-tips/tracing-round-buildings/
Best regards
Mannivu (2025-05-28 17:46:22+00:00): Grazie
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166864603
SafwatHalaby (2025-05-28 09:28:43+00:00): ברוכים הבאים ל-OSM ותודה על התרומה! מומלץ לקרוא את הנחיות ישראל כאן:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/HE:Israel
SafwatHalaby (2025-05-28 09:31:32+00:00): סידרתי קצת יותר את החיבור. עדכן אותי אם לא עשיתי את זה נכון.
Frans S (2025-06-01 11:58:44+00:00): correct mapped
Frans S (2025-06-02 10:36:14+00:00): Hello, Thanks for mapping.
This object is not a building.
You can see a shadow on the in- and outside of the object. Most likely, it is a catlle yard.
Best regards
Frans S (2025-05-28 10:49:05+00:00): Hello, Thanks for mapping.
Please map a round hut in line with the mapping method.
https://learnosm.org/en/hot-tips/tracing-round-buildings/
Your mapping here is far oversized and not rounded.
Best regards and keep mapping
Arif Ali Khan (2025-05-28 11:33:38+00:00): Hi Frans, Thanks to identify the error. Since i had joined the meeting a little late, i has missed few of the important points and somehow managed on my own to figure out the way. Could you please help me to share the recording of that session, or a brief summary to recap and remember the important points and correct procedure. 
Thanks
Frans S (2025-05-28 12:45:32+00:00): Hi, Thanks for contacting me.
However, I am not involved in the organisation this Mapathlon.
I mostly validate mappings.
I forwared your question to the author of this project. You might expect an answer from them.
In the meantime check this page about how to map in IDeditor
Best regards
Frans S (2025-05-28 12:46:06+00:00): Sorry, forgot to copy the link in my reaction.
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#basic-editing-with-id
houtari (2025-10-11 21:06:02+00:00): Hello! I'd though I'd let you know that you've used the wrong language here in the name tag. You should use the Swedish name as this is in one of the 15 municipalities of Finland that has Swedish as it's major language. This is the case for following municipalities ... Larsmo|Pedersöre|Malax|Nykarleby|Korsnäs|Vörå|Kronoby|Närpes|Korsholm|Kimitoön|Raseborg|Pargas|Jakobstad|Kristinestad|Ingå
houtari (2025-10-11 21:07:08+00:00): This isn't the only error I've seen your team make with naming highways in Finland.
PulisakZ (2025-10-13 07:52:20+00:00): Thanks for bringing this to my attention and I apologize for an unintentional mistake. 
I have updated street name.
houtari (2025-10-13 15:40:06+00:00): This wasn't just one single incident. I would actually claim that there's a significant amount of similar cases created by your team. So maybe you should look into this a bit further?

I created this overpass script to check these 15 municipalities that have Swedish as their major language to check if "name" isn't the same as "name:sv".
Some are of course just plain typos, but I would say that most are examples of Finnish behind the name tag, when it should indeed be Swedish.
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2dtP

A quick glimpse also suggest that a significant amount of these were originally created by your team. eg.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1139157967/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/640493457/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/640388281/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1174678518/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/165214296/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1139170291/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1174699122/history

These I found just by checking the 15 most northern issues of this Overpass Query of mine. So based on this I would estimate that about 50% of these errors could have been created by your team.
Aleksandar Matejevic (2025-10-14 08:35:11+00:00): Hi houtari, 
thanks for bringing this issue up to conversation. I have saw that 329 road segments do not have Swedish as their primary name and 185 of them are named by our team. 

We will deep dive into this and correct the issues. However, there was a complain from the community when we asked about adding default Sweeden name in these parts of Finland, and the answer was not all of the roads have Sweedish name as a primary one. This is why we added Finland name as default in name value, however, we also added both name:sv and name:fi variants and so both data exist in correct manner. It was expected that community will react and correct name tag using local knowledge.

If you are 100% sure that name should be the same as name:sv in these cases, we will go and fix the issue. Can you claim that is the case?
houtari (2025-10-14 10:22:27+00:00): Do you have any concrete examples of cases where Swedish wasn't according to the community the main language of the way? I would really like to dig into to root cause of the complain/complaints, to see what "the community" in this case consists of and what it's opinion is based on. Working in the public sector with GIS I also have contacts in the GIS world etc. municipality GIS admins and I am constantly in interaction with the eg. reporting diffrent signage problems we encounter in OSM when on the other hand mapping what's on the ground and on the other hand looking at official datasets from the municipalities or national land survey. Sometimes we do find errors made by the authorities, who then correct them.
houtari (2025-10-14 10:23:04+00:00): This language prioritization subject is an ongoing discussion in the finnish OSM community that actually bumps up from time to time when some individuals seem to override the existing agreement in the wiki to obey this principle with as I see it quite light arguments like "we're in Finland let's use Finnish". Not taking to account the different language profiles of our municipalities. Some people usually from the municipal minority try to singlehandedly override this situation by creating their own local versions with eg. two names in the name field. But before going to action I think this should be properly discussed in the community which it never has. I'm also glad to restart an internal discussion in the community forum to sort this out properly if you see that would be required and/or alternatively try to organize the community to go these things through. But as I said firstly I really would like to know the causes of the complaints you mentioned.

This all said there is now one possbile argument I'll accept and that's for parts of the Raseborg municipality which was created when joining together several old municipalities. After this merge the new municipality Raseborg had Swedish as it's major language, and a result of this former Pohja (Pojo in Swedish) municipality (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/37373) now a part of Raseborg (Raasepori in Finnish) which earlier was primary finnish had to change their language prioritization. Of course they didn't change their road name signs overnight so there might still be some old road signs in this region where Finnish comes before Swedish. This municipality merge took place already in 2009, so they have had some time to fix things. Otherwise there is no similar history of language prioritization change.

Wiki ref ...
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multilingual_names#Finland

Community discussion refs ...
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/kaksikieliset-nimet-kartalla/4824
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mista-loytaa-nimistoa-paa-ja-vahemmistokielilla-muille-kuin-teille/127444
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/kaksikielisten-paikkakuntien-nimikaytannoista/129300
Aleksandar Matejevic (2025-10-14 10:46:17+00:00): Thanks for details. Like I said, we will go and fix these, just wanted to be sure that there will not be someone else then requesting to revert the changes. 

As for some sings on the road:

Pihlajaniementie

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=62.257069400000006&lng=21.743292600002974&z=17.57330179130633&pKey=666318848184789&focus=photo&x=0.16466148175384443&y=0.537453875300027&zoom=1.9387539598732837

Patorannantie
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=62.255617799997964&lng=21.746264399999973&z=17&pKey=143715228386775&focus=photo&x=0.283936833072656&y=0.4590130394675816&zoom=2.5850052798310448

Harjunpääntie
https://www.google.com/maps/place/60%C2%B004'41.6%22N+23%C2%B038'19.8%22E/@60.0785387,23.6387796,3a,16.2y,52.52h,85.41t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1srqjh5vnVkrzxF0JbXnO8EQ!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fcb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26pitch%3D4.588176714423497%26panoid%3Drqjh5vnVkrzxF0JbXnO8EQ%26yaw%3D52.518237217447414!7i16384!8i8192!4m4!3m3!8m2!3d60.0782222!4d23.6388333?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI1MTAwOC4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D
houtari (2025-10-14 11:02:02+00:00): Quick answer to these cases Pihlajaniementie & Patorannantie :  these roads cross the municipality border going from a primary Finnish municipality to primary Swedish. The signs seem to be on the "Finnish side". Therefore I think we should switch the language prioritization for the roads in the different parts of the roads. So they should be splitted were municipality the border is crossed. The last example (Harjunpääntie) is exactly from this former Pohja municipality. So either the Google picture you're refering to (note shouldn't be used as reference in OSM) is either very old or the municipality hasn't had time to update new municipality language "settings".
houtari (2025-10-14 11:03:35+00:00): So for the first two roads. Karijoki is primary finnish and Kristinestad (Kristiinankaupunki in finnish) is primary swedish
Aleksandar Matejevic (2025-10-14 11:04:57+00:00): Ok, thanks.
houtari (2025-10-14 11:12:09+00:00): No, problem and Karijoki is Bötom in Swedish - a new thing I learned today. Just let me know if you encounter any other interesting questions. I'll be glad to help out.
Frans S (2025-06-01 11:53:59+00:00): T 225 already commented
Frans S (2025-05-28 13:26:20+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please don't oversize your mappings. 
Zoom in rather far to be able to map precise.
Best regards
Frans S (2025-05-28 13:19:55+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please do not oversize your mappings.
Also solve the issues shown by the issue triangle before you upload your mappings
On this page you can see which adjustments I had to make.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=166875927
Best regards
Frans S (2025-06-01 11:50:25+00:00): T 737  Far oversized mappings.
Frans S (2025-05-31 13:19:17+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please do not oversize buildings.
You mapped buildings with a dia of 50 mtr, In fact they just are 20 mtr in dia !
Best regards
whb (2025-05-29 11:17:42+00:00): Rückgängig gemacht, dreifache Eintragung:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6321876774
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1390455539/history
Frans S (2025-06-01 11:43:23+00:00): T 575  already commented by another validator
Gregory Peony (2025-06-05 14:28:26+00:00): This footprint is vaid and appropriately circularised but is oversized. Oversized features can casue overlap issues and lead to less accurate population estimates. Take care when tracing the footpritnt and use the shortcut shift+(-/+) to scale selected features after tagging and shaping them. --- Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166865541
Frans S (2025-06-02 12:12:44+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
A few remarks.
You mapped an already mapped buildings far oversized and tagged it with names.#msf_hk ....
Don't add hashtags to names of buildings.
Just tag a building as building=yes.
I corrected it.
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2025-05-28 11:04:50+00:00): Hello.
Corrected the size of the building.
Best regards