piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
iandees (2026-04-14 00:59:25+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13135581701 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181299596, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
joost schouppe (2026-04-30 09:58:34+00:00): Since there is no amenity=fire_station left, this is not a firestation anymore (the building type describes what the building was built for, not what activities take place there). Also, if you want to model building:part, I've always learned that they should be unified in an enclosing polygon, not a multipolygon. I've made the adjustments
felipeeugenio (2026-04-14 12:56:53+00:00): Hola. Ese es un camino de servicio privado. No tiene nombre. Fue corregido

gracias
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181299825
Supaplex (2026-04-14 02:59:10+00:00): revert obvious wrong change

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181301416
felipeeugenio (2026-04-14 12:46:21+00:00): Hola. Por favor no usar contracciones en los nombres. No tiene sentido en un medio digital.
Pte. es Puente? así lo dejé.

Pero una duda: estos son nombres oficiales? no están en ningún registro.

Saludos
Frans S (2026-04-19 13:52:12+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this task.
What makes you decide that this building (and the one next to it) are damaged buildings?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1479820335/history

No visible damage. The right one has a roof with corrugated metal sheets (rusty)
I change the damage tag to no damage
Check the example on the project instructions please.
Best regards and keep mapping
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-07 22:04:59+00:00): Removed SEO spam and cleaned up other tags for POI in changeset 183801431

https://osm.org/changeset/183801431
Wildsharky (2026-04-15 07:30:49+00:00): Revert of 181211912
Glassman (2026-04-14 16:59:06+00:00): According to the county, these look like private service roads. I'm going to change them, but feel free to let me know if you disagree.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181300763
renobles (2026-04-14 17:02:05+00:00): Nope you are right. Thanks for fixing that.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181300763
Wildsharky (2026-04-16 09:29:58+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:181400290
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:00:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
StreetSurveyor (2026-04-19 21:46:22+00:00): Going forward, please map these as driveways or parking aisles rather than service roads. They do not function as general service roads and should be tagged in line with their actual on-the-ground use per OSM guidelines.
PedestrianMapping_MapShadow (2026-04-21 06:21:58+00:00): Thanks for the clarification, we appreciate it. Currently we are focusing on pedestrian network only, sure We’ll map service ways as driveways or parking aisles when required as per OSM guidelines.
felipeeugenio (2026-04-15 11:55:40+00:00): Hola Juan.
Sería bueno que te metieras al chat de Telegram, en el link en mi bio.
hay cada vez mas maperos de tu zona y sería bueno que interactuaran- Tu claramente conoces el sector, por lo que sería valiosa tu presencia.

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181302042
ion_chi (2026-04-14 14:44:42+00:00): Hi Modriano, I've reverted this change as the cycleways were mapped correctly before and this changeset introduced crossing ways. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181326659
TrickyFoxy (2026-06-06 11:39:26+00:00): 👋 Не вносите личные заметки в OpenStreetMap. Используйте раздел Метки в приложении
rskedgell (2026-07-14 11:40:44+00:00): When you added separate sidewalks to Vaughan Road, they pass over a bridge which is really obvious in the aerial imagery.

The way you map a highway over a bridge is to add a positive layer=* and bridge=yes

They way you DO NOT map a highway over a bridge is to join it to all the ways it crosses, and accept iD's default (and stupid) suggestion to add a ford where it crosses waterways. Canals in the UK, even ornamental ones, are not crossed by fords. Fords on sidewalks where the parent highway does not cross the waterway by a ford are highly improbable (and in an urban area like London, infinitely improbable).

I actually live in London and use OSM-based routing software. Since Uber started to inflict paid "mappers" like you upon me, it is rare that I can plan a running or walking route without having to to make manual adjustments to my route and then repair OSM.

In this case, thanks to your edit, Komoot gave me a route which required me to travel 5 metres vertically upward through a bridge deck. This would give me a headache.

As an unpaid volunteer, you probably cannot understand how much I resent fixing the sloppy editing of paid corporate "mappers".

Please desist from mapping in London until you have received adequate training.
Vandana@28 (2026-07-14 13:02:49+00:00): Hi rskedgell ,
Thanks for performing the edits. Thank you for catching these errors and for taking the time to correct the changesets. We are not currently editing in London, UK, and we stopped editing there on 26 May 2026. 

Regards,
Vandana N
rskedgell (2026-07-14 13:19:29+00:00): Uber may have stopped editing in London, but what are they doing to rectify the problems caused? I'd suggest deleting all objects added by Uber mappers which are still at v1.
pnorman (2026-07-14 13:48:59+00:00): @Vandana@28, can you provide a link to the organized editing page for the edits you were conducting? In particular I'm trying to find a link to the community consultation that was done prior to the activity.
Vandana@28 (2026-07-14 15:25:51+00:00): Please find the page with the organized edits.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uber_Pedestrian_Data_Improvements_in_London
pnorman (2026-07-14 19:28:17+00:00): The page you've linked says the status is "Consultation in progress. No edits under this activity will be made until the local discussion has run its course." The forum discussion linked has no messages from Uber either, so it looks like Uber hasn't yet started the community consultation for this proposed edit.

In addition in the forum post the page does link to the consensus is clearly against Uber performing the proposed organized edit.
Vandana@28 (2026-07-15 18:22:42+00:00): Hi pnorman ,
Thank you for flagging this. You are absolutely right, and we apologize for the oversight.
  We have now updated the wiki pages for both the London Sidewalks organized edit (Uber Pedestrian Data Improvements in London) and our other global edit pages (Uber Road Geometry, Turn Restrictions, Directionality & Lane Connectivity Improvements) to accurately reflect the current status.
  We also confirm that all edits under this organized edit in London were stopped in June 2026, and we are not currently making any edits. 
  Additionally, we are currently in the process of reviewing the edits we made in London to ensure they meet the expected quality and community standards.


Based on the updated wiki page status, could you please advise whether we may proceed with resuming edits?

Thank you again for your patience and guidance.
pnorman (2026-07-15 19:37:48+00:00): No community consultation was done for this organized edit. Uber needs to go to the forum and discuss this with the UK community. They should also explain how they missed community consultation.

For the other edit, it also looks like no communication consultation was done. Organized edits require the consultation happen before edits are done. Since it apparently hasn't started then there should be no edits under that organized edit.
FroschForscher (2026-04-29 16:02:39+00:00): War löschen die Beabsichtigte Aktion hier? Der Änderungssatz Kommentar klingt nicht danach.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181302978
Wildsharky (2026-04-16 09:25:12+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:181357117
Norbert Dichter (2026-04-14 08:28:05+00:00): Hello, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. Thank you for your contribution. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. Or just hit the Q-key.
Also please keep in mind: many buildings are very close but do not actually touch each other, try to map them close to each other without letting them connect or share nodes with each other, roads, or residential area outlines. In the iD web editor, holding down the "alt" key will keep nodes from "snapping" to each other and accidentally connecting.  Thanks so much for your contribution, Norbert 'Nodi' Dichter, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181303103
BCNorwich (2026-04-14 05:09:36+00:00): Sorry, for the large bounding box, everything's OK.
rempshaener (2026-04-14 20:10:53+00:00): Hallo,
zu den Unterflurhydranten: Keine Anmerkung.
Eine Anmerkung zu https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6633178412: Nach Luftbild könnte das eventuell auch sein:
natural=water
water=pond
emergency=fire_water_pond
(als Fläche)
Viele Grüße
NeisBot (2026-04-14 05:18:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13729035857 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Dentist office"

#MapWithoutSpam
guillemmal (2026-04-14 20:59:20+00:00): Dear,

This is a two-way street, please do not attempt to change direction if you are unfamiliar with the area. Thank you! If you have any questions, the community is active on Telegram!

Regards
LakeOnega (2026-04-16 08:35:34+00:00): Hello guillemmal, thanks for reaching out. I had intended to just add a oneway from https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12396022024 to https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2502974774, but unintentionally applied the oneway tag to the entire way. Thanks for restoring the data and apologies for the oversight. Have a nice day!
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-14 06:09:37+00:00): Welcome to OSM.

This changeset should be reviewed.

Thanks.
Fraxi (2026-04-14 08:55:15+00:00): Ако може, актуализирай и статута на спирките, които се виждат, но не са част от актуалния маршрут. Въпреки че в сайта на ЦГМ пише, че промяната ще е до 20.04. Имам предвид спирки като https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11070539296 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12091346881 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13609542004(такава пък никога не помня да съм виждал) . Виж и други, които сме обсъждали от https://notesreview.org/?view=map&map=16%2F42.6643%2F23.2699&query=%D0%941&bbox=23.2589%2C42.6598%2C23.2809%2C42.6687&area=view&status=all
Dimitar155 (2026-04-14 09:29:25+00:00): Първите две си се ползват, но съм забравил да ги добавя в релацията. Последната съществуваше за кратко.

По бележките, тази на 9 часа в кръговото я няма, както и спирката на Иван Сусанин при Кота 1050. В кръговото на 1 часа си е там.

Останалите 3 спирки източно от реката също са актуални, но са от първоначалните (още когато линията беше с номер Д1) и явно не им се сменя табелата.
NeisBot (2026-04-14 06:27:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13729116239 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Houseboat Zaindari Palace"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisBot (2026-04-14 06:48:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13729116239 v4

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Houseboat"

#MapWithoutSpam
dav23r (2026-04-14 22:12:40+00:00): Hi! I assume you are the owner of the hotel node you deleted, because it's no longer functioning? Just in case if it's entirely different venue it can be tagged appropriately to differentiate between the two. 

For the Nakashidze 10 hotel, internet_access:fee=customers is more appropiate for the common case - "no for customers / free for customers" - see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:internet%20access:fee?uselang=en

About the cafe's outdoor_seating=yes , are you sure? :) I didn't see it when visiting couple days ago,  but maybe you put out folding chairs/inventory seasonally?
literan (2026-04-14 11:50:50+00:00): корректнее со словом "озеро":

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Названия#Имя_–_это_название_и_только

если что, я тут правлю сейчас
Nyosp (2026-04-14 15:24:19+00:00): Понял принял
MKnight (2026-04-14 09:27:51+00:00): Moin,
hier stimmen veschiedene Sachen nicht,

es kann nicht Sackgasse UND Einbahnstrasse gleichzeitig sein.

maxspeed kann nicht 5kmh sein, es sei denn es ist direkt so ausgeschildert. Eine Spielstrasse hat kein explizites maxspeed, sondern "Schrittgeschwindigkeit"
Vincent Heurtel (2026-04-14 11:43:23+00:00): laut
https://www.google.com/maps/@50.9843774,11.3268472,3a,24.9y,204.65h,89.1t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1ssua7SpcqDaHnodz8c9nYHQ!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fcb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26pitch%3D0.8951288189641247%26panoid%3Dsua7SpcqDaHnodz8c9nYHQ%26yaw%3D204.65143270315113!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI2MDQwOC4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D
ist die Gasse doch als Sackgasse und verkehrsberuhigter Bereich bzw. Spielgasse definiert. 
Die Einbahnstrasse wird durch das Verbotschild auf die andere Seite de facto definiert
https://www.google.com/maps/@50.9830541,11.3269539,3a,15y,4.48h,92.9t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1s6n9YzT-TMP_GEdsB4OqE5Q!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fcb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26pitch%3D-2.9034249112034587%26panoid%3D6n9YzT-TMP_GEdsB4OqE5Q%26yaw%3D4.480987590758393!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI2MDQwOC4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D.

Und ja es ist "Schrittgeschwindigkeit" welche ich in einer Zahl umgewandelt habe. Gesetzlich ist es aber nicht definiert.
Viele Navi führen Autos in solchen Straßen obwohl es nicht sein sollte.
MKnight (2026-04-14 12:02:33+00:00): verschiedene Sachen:

- Google ist keine legale Quelle für Openstreetmap, nicht machen
- das Foto ist mehrere Jahre alt
- das Verbotsschild definiert keine Einbahnstrasse (Verbot der Einfahrt - sogenannte "unechte Einbahnstrasse")
Die Strasse ist keine Einbahnstrasse, ich kann hier aus einer Garage heraus in jede Richtung fahren, wenn ich will
- wir wandeln keine Verkehrsregeln in ausgedachte Zahlen um
- das Sackgassenschild ist, wie ich hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5249382#map=19/50.983851/11.327025 schon meinte recht sicher aus einer Zeit, als der Rollplatz Baustelle war
- wir mappen nicht für Navis, Navis, die falsch routen sind kaputt

Zusätzlich ist an keiner Stelle ein accessbeschränkung sichtbar, ich werde das mal auf den normalen Stand korigieren
Steube (2026-06-19 12:07:14+00:00): Aktuell immer noch Baustelle in den Friedensgasse, daher vom Rollplatz her als Sackgasse gekennzeichnet. Passieren für Fu´ßgänger ist möglich.
This Value Is Blank (2026-04-14 07:18:02+00:00): Review requested because this is my first time doing stuff with relations, and I want to make sure I get it right
LudovicG (2026-04-17 08:34:24+00:00): Je regardais comme ça à distance : Rue Follie ou Rue Folie ?
temmie18 (2026-04-17 21:22:20+00:00): Anciennement "rue Follie", mais apparemment ça a été modifié pour donner "rue Folie". 
Sur le panneau du début de la rue, c'est aussi écrit avec un seul L.
GOwin (2026-04-14 08:52:01+00:00): Hello! Maybe the FAQ for waterway mapping can help you with this: https://hackmd.io/@osmph/H1ZB1J9Tle#How-do-I-distinguish-between-a-river-and-a-stream
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181308784
GOwin (2026-04-14 08:44:12+00:00): This waterway is too wide to be a stream. Remember the OSM convention: if an able-bodied person should can jump across a waterway, it's a stream, wider than that, it's a stream. Based on imagery, most segments of this waterway is more than 3m wide.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181309006
ika-chan! (2026-04-14 09:09:57+00:00): This changeset was reverted for adding parking that does not exist, according to Esri imagery.
xjki (2026-04-14 09:50:26+00:00): Ok, but it is marked as free parking with the sign, and I parked there last night :)
xjki (2026-04-14 09:57:34+00:00): Whole green area is free parking, entrance from Averof street
ika-chan! (2026-04-14 12:19:08+00:00): In my opinion, the parking area looks too informal to be mapped at this time. Otherwise the area would look bare like at coordinates 39.704890,21.624380.
xjki (2026-04-14 12:30:11+00:00): It's marked as free parking even in Google maps
https://maps.app.goo.gl/9AsSs45qrx6de6eZA?g_st=ic
ika-chan! (2026-04-14 12:34:13+00:00): We can't use Google Maps as a source for mapping here on OpenStreetMap. See: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google
xjki (2026-04-14 16:06:52+00:00): So just to be sure I (as newcomer) understand - me being there and adding new parking place myself is not enough, and referencing that parking is indeed there (if there's doubt of my submission) in another mapping is also not adding weight. I hoped that my submission helps someone who is looking for parking area in Meteora.
ika-chan! (2026-04-15 06:27:20+00:00): I'm sorry if I sounded a bit harsh, but the issue is that the feature has to physically exist, and we in Greece have been dealing with people who add things that turn out not to exist.

To reduce confusion next time, it would be useful to declare what the source is (the source=* tag – for example, source="Survey of 2026-04-15", see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source) for the feature, if you cannot see it in the aerial imagery. But we can't use Google Maps as the source because we are not allowed to use that source.

If the feature is seasonal, then use the tag opening_hours=* (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours for the syntax).
xjki (2026-04-15 09:10:26+00:00): Thanks for the hint. When submitting from the Organic Maps mobile app, should I just add the "source=Survey on <date>" just in the comments? 
Or it is recommended to use other apps/service for adding places. Beginner tutorial mentions only 3 service, but all of them are not really build for use from mobile phone.
ika-chan! (2026-04-15 13:41:52+00:00): I would use iD instead. It allows you to add additional tags like source=* and opening_hours=*. There's a tutorial about it at https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/.
NeisBot (2026-04-14 08:12:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13729306883 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Plastic surgery clinic"

#MapWithoutSpam
mikini (2026-04-19 16:55:24+00:00): Hejsa i Viborg.

Hvilke KDS-kort og geodata er det konkret du tegner efter her? De virker ikke til at være aktuelle.

Du har fjernet ting i mit lokalområde i Tjæreborgs Gamle Grusgrave som er nyetablerede i sommeren 2025 og som blev tilføjet OSM i 2025-06, altså efter ortofotos 2025;

* ny sti mod Ejlif Krogagers Vej; https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1410598896
* stier om sydlige sø inklusiv gangbro over grøft (som godt nok er oversvømmede på ortofotos 2025 men det er jo altid et øjebliksbillede), de var omlagte og farbare i 2025-06 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/mikini/traces/12298513) og er stadig vedligeholdte og fuldt farbare ved survey i denne uge; https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/880803830 & https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/880803820
* hegn, som godt nok er omlagt omkring de nye bygninger, men som stadig delvist eksisterer langs mark/sti; https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/955886905

Du fjerner også uden videre surface på de fleste stier; https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/386795074, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1410598897, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/484439751, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/96321785, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/414811075, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/96321790

Jeg synes det er lidt bisset bare at komme tromlende på den måde. Tjek i det mindste om seneste redigering er efter det ortofoto der bruges som kilde.
Det skulle jo gerne være muligt at udvide detaljegraden uden at risikere at det bliver tilbagestillet til status på senest tilgængelige ortofoto.

Hilsner,
Mikkel
osmviborg (2026-04-19 17:49:08+00:00): Ser på det i morgen, genskaber det der er muligt. Det du kalder stier var tegnet som footway (fortov) passer dårligt i et område som dette.
osmviborg (2026-04-20 05:48:08+00:00): Changeset: 181564531