piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
chris66 (2023-07-11 16:11:14+00:00): Hi, zu den Stellplätzen: Laut Wiki soll capacity nur bei mehr als Eins angegeben werden und die Eigenschaften des Gesamtplatzes sollen nicht an allen Stellplätzen wiederholt werden.

Grüße,
Chris

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE%3ATag%3Aamenity%3Dparking_space
TheSwavu (2023-07-09 09:36:19+00:00): Reverted geofiction mapping.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138289656
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-07-12 23:45:04+00:00): porque removeu o caminho? caminhos não oficiais tbm podem estar mapeados.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-10-20 23:23:53+00:00): revertido
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-11 16:56:50+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1164536672/history has amenity = convenience that was added in this edit
What was meant by amenity=convenience? Is it a convenience shop? Then shop=convenience is likely a better tagging, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=convenience .
bxl-forever (2023-07-07 20:18:26+00:00): Pardon my curiosity but is this a test edit here?

For instance, this area does not look like a forest to me.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1188154340
And if it does, the geometry of this area seems grossly inaccurate.  Bing Maps Aerial should be avoided in European countries, especially where we have very detailed aerial and numerical imagery.

Same for all the other forests you added here.  Do you really think that every mapper who has been working on the map for the last 15 years has missed those important parts?

Nice try but I am afraid we should consider undoing your changes.
Abijan (2023-07-10 08:40:14+00:00): Please "Assume good faith", I consider this comment quite aggressive. 

On the content, there is a forest around the KasteelTerRivieren, why not map it, even if that mapping could be improved?
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-07-12 22:12:26+00:00): de onde voce tirou que existe uma via assim aqui? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1188156170
Raphaelkaart (2023-07-23 13:29:18+00:00): Bom dia!
Fiz a correção da via Residencial mencionada acima!

Obrigado pelo contato. 

Att.
Raphaelkaart
Himké (2023-08-03 17:17:37+00:00): Hi Astay22,

"Picton Airport" is the name of the aerodrome and should not be removed.
Himké (2023-08-03 17:18:28+00:00): The feature already has the aeroway=aerodrome tag
aceman444 (2023-08-09 06:09:23+00:00): Naco to sekanie kruhovzch objazdov, ked maju po celom obvode rovnake vlastnosti? Este k tomu na nezmyselnych miestach (nie len tam kde su vyjazdy) a ani potom neopravite linky MHD, ktore sa ytm pokazia. Naopak, este ich viac donicite pouzivanim editora iD, ktory si cleny v relaciach MHD svojvolne preusporiada a nespravne.
mapperue (2023-08-09 10:33:56+00:00): Budem usporiadanie kontrolovať cez JOSM.
aceman444 (2023-08-11 15:54:15+00:00): Pri Vasom mnozstve zmien odporucam rovno robit len v JOSM:) Nemusite potom kontrolovat usporiadanie, lebo Vam ho v prvom rade ani nepokazi. Ale po rozdeleni kruhaca, treba clenov relacie skontrolovat/opravit aj v nom, ale neznici Vam relaciu aj na inych miestach ako iD. Len teda hovorim, ze delit tie kruhace nie je potrebne, nevadi ak je v relacii MHD cely kruhac.
mapperue (2023-08-11 16:26:48+00:00): Nevšimol som si, že pri úprave ciest pri kruhovom objazde rozdelí iD editor aj samotný objazd. Relácie budem kontrolovať v JOSM.
aceman444 (2023-08-11 16:36:56+00:00): To by ma teda zaujimalo, ci delenie kruhaca robi sam iD. Prosim odsledujte to.
mapperue (2023-08-11 17:21:15+00:00): Tento problém s kruháčmi je známy dlhšie:
https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/6711
Aj problém s poradím členov relácie:
https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/8578
aceman444 (2023-08-12 11:24:58+00:00): Dakujem za potvrdenie. No takze som mal pravdu. Skuste teda pouzivat JOSM, ktory taketo svojvolne veci nerobi, alebo tie relacie po sebe skontrolujte. Len upozornujem, ze upratat tie linky MHD, ktore maju cykly (nie len kruhace) a iD ich ponici, je dost praca.
jmarchon (2023-07-08 18:30:08+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM!

Is there a sign here prohibiting bicycles? Or any other indication that bicycles are not allowed on any of these motorways?

Happy mapping!
haki9975 (2023-07-08 18:52:27+00:00): Yes, this section of the highway is an elevated hi-speed highway with no access or egress for pedestrians or bicycles and is known as Interstate 105 which is a spur of Interstate 5
jmarchon (2023-07-08 19:40:55+00:00): Bicycles are allowed by default on Oregon motorways. Are you sure this does not apply here?
haki9975 (2023-07-10 17:37:43+00:00): You're correct, I went to physically verify and there was no sign prohibiting bicycles
jmarchon (2023-07-11 15:34:59+00:00): This changeset have been reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138385844
jmarchon (2023-07-11 15:36:15+00:00): I've reverted the changesets adding this info.
jmarchon (2023-07-11 15:35:14+00:00): This changeset have been reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138385851
jmarchon (2023-07-11 15:34:42+00:00): This changeset have been reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138385831
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 22:46:57+00:00): своїми домислами створюєш безлад!
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 22:56:19+00:00): Ти не любиш людей, гівнюк!
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 23:00:20+00:00): срань що ти робиш на мапах!
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 23:16:23+00:00): Твої потуги на мапах - гівно!
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 23:28:54+00:00): Гріх!
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-31 22:14:44+00:00): не гніви Бога!
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-31 22:27:56+00:00): "Виправлення орфографії" - це після "Стройка"?
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-31 22:34:35+00:00): хуєсос
CurlingMan13 (2023-07-12 06:08:49+00:00): I mean, regardless of whether it is closed or not, the fact that there are vendors here pretty much confirms it is a pedestrian area.

Can you elaborate on why this isn't a pedestrian area?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpedestrian
asphalteric (2023-07-12 06:21:28+00:00): Since vendors are often here, maybe it should be a commercial area then. Rincon Plaza does not look like a pedestrian area. It looks like a vendor selling area with very little room for pedestrians to walk through.
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 22:42:41+00:00): Не гніви Бога! Покайся!
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 23:08:37+00:00): Деморалізуєш
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 23:12:19+00:00): Біблію не шануєш!
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-30 23:28:02+00:00): Заактуалізував дані вже? Усе перевірив? Перевір знову!
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-31 22:12:24+00:00): продажна потвора!
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-31 22:18:38+00:00): щоб ти більше свої русизми не пхав на мапи!
SenoRsO2 (2023-07-31 22:33:58+00:00): "Актуалізація даних" твоя в жопу!
maraf24 (2023-07-12 12:35:30+00:00): W OSM nie mapujemy historii. 
Jeśli coś bylo, a teraz nie ma, to nie jest to mapowalne. Takie obiekty prędzej czy później (raczej później :) zostaną stąd usunięte.
Kovirii (2023-07-16 17:31:15+00:00): Please copy over existing address information when deleting existing points
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138242430
Xvtn (2023-12-14 20:42:57+00:00): Yeah, if you were there in person and there's no public access then you can definitely put access=no. For situations like this I'll also add a check_date=* tag to show a future mapper how stale the observation is. (Since it might be reopened in the future)
opendcc (2023-07-08 15:54:14+00:00): Hallo, Du hast hier auf langer Strecke den Kirchdorfer Bach eingebuddelt (layer-1, culvert) ...
AIBPG (2023-07-12 09:22:42+00:00): Kirchdorfer Bach wurde von mir nicht Bearbeitet!
opendcc (2023-07-12 09:40:19+00:00): Sorry, an der Stelle ist der Name dann schon Moosbach. Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/429826617/history
VLD549 (2023-08-14 11:51:41+00:00): Hi, could you explain why the name change? On the site it looks like it should be Natuurkampeerterrein Minicamping Singel.
Thank you!
emvee (2023-08-14 20:55:03+00:00): Looking better I think the name should be "Minicamping Singel" see the bottom of the home page.

In the sense I think even only "Singel" would be enough, the rest is "advertisement"
VLD549 (2023-08-28 17:57:56+00:00): Yes, I agree. Minicamping Singel is the registered name at the KVK.
pyrog (2023-08-25 17:27:55+00:00): Salut,
Cette modif à cassé un itinéraire du réseau PDIPR.
https://knooppuntnet.nl/fr/analysis/changeset/138243709/5651374

Je corrige. N'hésite pas à demander des conseils sur l'édition des relations.
iD n'est pas l'éditeur le plus adapté pour cette tâche.

Cordialement,
Yves
GrochatFC (2023-08-25 18:00:52+00:00): En gros je fais que des conneries quoi. Je me rend bien compte d'id n'a pas l'air au top.
Il y avait une passerelle pour franchier le voix de chemin de fer et elle a été détruite. Moi je me suis occupé du sentier des radeliers qui passait pas cette passerelle.
J'ai essayé JOSM mais j'ai pas compris grand chose.
pyrog (2023-08-25 18:07:13+00:00): C'est normal de faire des erreurs en commençant.
iD est pratique pour des modifications simples.
Pour les relations simples aussi.
C'est très facile de "casser" des relations sans s'en rendre compte.
Même sans effacer des membres, souvent on les mélange ce qui pose aussi problème pour beaucoup d'applications.

JOSM n'est pas évident du tout au départ, surtout si on est habitué à iD.
opendcc (2023-07-08 10:33:54+00:00): Hallo, bei Orten in denen keine gewidmeten Straßen sind, wird statt addr:street dann addr:place gemapped, also z.B. addr:place=Stocka

Servus
DUGA (2024-12-08 19:50:32+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/17604631/history#map=16/38.80687/-75.75200

This road has not been paved, if I remember correctly, for over 10 years
eggie (2023-07-08 07:41:09+00:00): Dag Tom  Je vraagt feedback.. Lijkt me helemaal oke..  Daar staat niets meer.
MVG
eggie
Tom de Neef (2023-07-08 07:47:32+00:00): Westerburenweg 8 is ook gewijzigd maar ik weet niet hoe de gegevens van kadaster over te nemen.
eggie (2023-07-08 07:57:00+00:00): Ik heb het aangepast aan de data van het Kadaster (na de verbouwing) 
Je kunt de achtergrond van de BGT en het Kadaster op de achtergrond zetten.
Zie draadje best layers in josm op het forum.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138253607

Even ctrl-f5 voor het effect.

Zie ook BGT implementeren  

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59021 

Forumdraadje ..  De beste imagery layers om NL OSM te mappen met JOSM. 

Https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=64644 
Groet
eggie
TheSwavu (2023-07-09 09:35:13+00:00): Reverted geofiction mapping.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138289622
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-02 13:32:56+00:00): Hello!

You used
sport=tennis;q
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/828197775/history

Have you maybe meant
sport=tennis
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?
Yorvik Prestigitator (2024-02-02 18:19:21+00:00): just a typo, thanks for spotting this, now fixed
Ltrlg (2023-07-07 21:56:37+00:00): source += Cadastre ; OrthoHR IGN 2020
Emilius123 (2023-08-13 13:28:29+00:00): Übrigens, das ist gar kein Kreisverkehr.

Die vorherige Darstellung hatte ich übrigens auch nur, weil ich persönlich fand, dass sie optisch am Ansprechendsten war. Ich habe es nun mal in die tatsächlich korrekte Form, inklusive durchgehender Burkhardstraße verwandelt, also vom lustigen Fünfeck in ein lustiges Viereck.

Hilft vielleicht den ganzen armen Fahrschülern, die hier tagtäglich durch müssen.
JesseFTW (2023-07-07 21:58:45+00:00): OK, this is such a messy route, and it's further confused by https://www.mbta.com/schedules/4/line?schedule_direction%5Bdirection_id%5D=0&schedule_direction%5Bvariant%5D=4-3-0 being inaccurate. If you look on the printed schedule https://cdn.mbta.com/sites/default/files/media/route_pdfs/batch_6374/4-S1-P3.pdf you can see the real route. I also got the name backwards, which I'll correct in the next changeset.
skorpion62 (2023-07-08 08:38:51+00:00): Hallo NGL-engel,
Du hast gestern auf diesen kombinierten Geh und Radweg ein tracktype= Grad 2 vergeben, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30647809

Ein tracktype ist hauptsächlich für Wirtschafts-, Feld-, oder Waldwege gedacht.

Hier wäre höchstens ein tracktype = Grad 1 richtig, denn der Weg ist asphaltiert, siehe hier: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:tracktype?uselang=de .

Ich bin diesen Weg vor ca. 3 Jahren gefahren und habe alles so eingetragen wie ich es vorgefunden habe.

Viele Grüße skorpion62
NGL-engel (2023-07-08 21:45:36+00:00): Hallo skorpion62, 
   der Weg ist zwar asphaltiert, aber er weißt an viele Stellen Frostschäden (mehr oder weniger große Löcher) auf. Vor 3 Jahren war sicher alles so wie Du geschrieben hast. 
Ich bin ihn in der letzten Woche gefahren und musste mit dem Rad extra langsamer als gewöhnlich fahren.
Der Teil des Weges, der nördlich des Röpker Weges ist, ist noch ok.
Gruß Angela
skorpion62 (2023-07-09 07:47:17+00:00): Hallo NGL-engel,
aus dem Grund habe ich ja diesen Weg mit mittelmäßig beschrieben. Das heißt er kann uneben sein und auch Löcher haben.
tacktype beschreibt den Weg, aus was für einem Material er besteht. Dieser Weg ist asphaltiert, das schreibst du ja selber, also kein Schotter oder ähnliches.
Siehe hier: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:tracktype?uselang=de
  
Viele Grüße skorpion62
ndm (2023-07-08 23:06:11+00:00): Please add former buildings to open historic map -- openstreetmap is for current data.
sirorezka (2023-07-09 12:03:21+00:00): Hi, this is historical grade II listed building known as "Former Leadworks / Leadworks". Thus building has current historic/tourism interest. Previously leadworks wikidata link was added directly to Aquarium amenity. Which in my opinion is incorrect, because "Aquarium" has it's own wikidata tag. Another thought on this - presence of restaurant in the building doesn't always change the building name. That's why in this case I have separated building itself and amenities. In comparison in London "The War Office" evolved to "The Old War Office" and recently changed name / purpose to "The OWO". Back to this case, if you check cadaster you will see that Aquarium also situated in the former Leadworks building. So the more correct way would be to merge all this buildings together and name everything "Aquarium", set old name / alt-name to leadworks and map that VR Lab and Prezzo restaurant just rent a space on the southern part of the Aquarium building. Let me know what you think about this arguments.
ndm (2023-07-09 15:03:43+00:00): It loses information, not a great approach - without area information renderers can’t determine which items are most important. I don’t think it really needs mapping - except on open historic map - if it’s that important maybe a relation? I was wondering about simple indoor mapping - but probably you’d need to add all entrances to each section. Or just add same wikidata tag to > 1 osm item which seems to be a heretical but practical approach.
sirorezka (2023-07-10 11:10:44+00:00): Sry, didn't get your point ) Could you please give an example. I'm usually looking at this situation in the following perspective:

If you are speaking about POI's inside the building - OSM allows to create amenities as areas or points. 

1) So you can create one building and then inside create several POI's as areas (which are not rendered as buildings). This is somewhat beneficial, because then POI's by default inherit building address, so you don't need to fill it manually for each POI. You can also associate entrance to the area. You might say that such POI-area are not visualised in navigation apps - but this is not OSM fault, data was added, it's just not used.

2) Other option is to use point for POI. In this case you plot point near the entrance. And again POI inherits building address. This is how google and bing do on their maps. Basically they don't care about poi internal area.

Speak about navigators - they usually prioritise POI's visualization to building details, so most likely building name will be hidden, but you will see all POI's (at least as icons). Also in both cases when poi will stop existing in 3-4 years (avg restaurant life) you still will have a building mapped. 

But of course if any of this two approaches make data mess on the map, then smth must be simplified.

I personally prefer not to plot poi's as buildings at all when poi doesn't take over whole building. For example in a shed to the east of the Aquarium we have three restaurant. So someone splitted shed into three separate buildings. I would approach to the shed mapping differently: OSM have building layer and amenities layer, so you should try to split them when possible. 

However there is no strict guidelines. So open to discussion.
ndm (2023-07-10 21:34:11+00:00): I split disparate business units which will have unique addresses into different buildings -- this is akin to splitting terraced houses.

Most of the centre of Bristol is mapped this way. If you want to combine separate businesses together then I think you need some sort of relation / other container.

Mapping businesses as areas is really simple to explain to beginners -- it let's them be updated really easily. It provides a hierarchy based on size, that can be used by renderers. In contrast having several POIs in a building says nothing about their relative importance / area.

It's possible that something like the simple indoor mapping scheme might capture the best of both -- treating business units as "rooms" -- though unfortunately most renderers don't draw the outlines -- so more difficult to visualize and it's more dificult to explain to beginners.
LockOnGuy (2023-07-08 00:21:28+00:00): Hello again, in this changeset you deleted valid postal codes, you removed English (way 587749558, node 5996533551, node 6139949900, node 6366080222, node 6576831641, ) and Arabic names (node 6680798485, node 10688732405) entirely. . I told you many times before to stop deleting names in languages you don't like, as this considered as vandalism. This is your last warning and I will get the DWG involved.     
Regards.
markkerrigan (2023-09-03 18:56:16+00:00): Hello so the hiker biker camping is not located at this spot. Reverting back the to actual location.
Dren ar Frankig (2023-10-14 11:31:04+00:00): Salud deoc'h, pelec'h peus kavet "ar Fav" skrivet mod-se? Me garfe goût mard eo skrivet "ar Fav" pe "ar Faou"
ChRogel (2023-10-22 13:56:02+00:00): N'eus kalz a faou el lec'hanvioù, nemet re ar Vro-Faou. War gKerofis e kaver Penfav e Melioneg hag a zo bet Penfao. Evit gwir eo gwirheñveloc'h tennañ ur steranv eus ar gwez eget eus ar plant. Met anv un den a c'hell bezañ ivez. A galon.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-07-22 14:20:55+00:00): Czyli https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3569768 nieaktualne?
Piotr Strębski (2023-07-24 04:53:57+00:00): Zgadza się 😉
TheSwavu (2023-07-09 09:34:53+00:00): Reverted geofiction mapping.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138289608
TheSwavu (2023-07-09 09:33:37+00:00): Reverted geofiction mapping.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138289558
LockOnGuy (2023-07-08 00:17:25+00:00): Hello again, in this changeset you deleted valid postal codes, you removed English (NODE: 10956828705) and Arabic names (node 8631425017) entirely.. I told you many times before to stop deleting names in languages you don't like, as this considered as vandalism. This is your last warning and I will get the DWG involved.      
Regards.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-09-23 16:38:32+00:00): voce nao pode pegar um projeto que varias pessoas usam e mudar porque a empresa que entrega bebida não quer passar pela via. por favor, não repita esta conduta
MxxCon (2023-07-09 00:14:57+00:00): Hello.
In cases like this where there are multiple locations of the same business, it's more appropriate to put that branch's name into branch= tag rather than stuffing it into the name= tag.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138247635
maaxx00 (2023-07-09 00:23:47+00:00): Hi.
That's why I requested a review, since I wasn't completely sure about it. I'll have that in mind next time I encounter the same issue. Thanks!
MxxCon (2023-07-09 00:30:46+00:00): Also the building should get clinic tag ONLY it's the whole building. If a business occupies only a section of it, such just an office space or a floor, the building should have a more generic tag such as office or retail or whatever else is appropriate.
maaxx00 (2023-07-09 00:41:30+00:00): That's why I only placed 2 locations as clinics, since these places were the only ones that used the entire building. The other places shared locations with other businesses.
And the last location that used to be a construction site was completed, but it still shared places with other businesses.
Bob Palin (2023-07-18 17:01:32+00:00): Why is 'geological' useless?
guilhermerrrr94 (2023-07-08 04:49:08+00:00): Olá Rafael! Obrigado por ajudar a melhorar nossa cidade no OpenStreetMap, vi que você costuma fazer edições ao redor do IMES e queria propor uma mudança na tag que foi usada para demarcar a área de árvores: a tag landuse=forest (floresta manejada) geralmente é usada para indicar árvores mantidas ou utilizadas industrialmente, como na silvicultura e acredito que nesse caso essa área seria melhor representada por natural=wood (mata nativa). Deixo abaixo os dois link da wiki explicando essas duas etiquetas:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Tag:landuse%3Dforest

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Tag:natural%3Dwood

Se quiser entrar em contato por mensagem privada pra gente conversar mais ou através do grupo OpenStreetMap Brasil no Telegram também estou por lá, sou de Catanduva também. Obrigado!
BlueButterfly (2023-07-10 19:01:19+00:00): Correction: Source used was Esri World Imagery; Já 360
Frans S (2023-08-27 12:24:13+00:00): Hello.
* Tagging of buildings. For HOTOSM projects, the standard tagging is 'building=yes' No further text adding.  Please keep that in mind at further mappings.
TheSwavu (2023-07-09 09:32:19+00:00): Reverted geofiction mapping.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138289527
Stalker61 (2023-07-16 18:02:47+00:00): Добрый день.
Может уже хватит многократно вносить ахинею со статусом дорог в базу проекта? Почитайте на досуге вот эти соглашения.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Дороги
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Highway_classification
Stalker61 (2023-07-16 18:02:37+00:00): Добрый день.
Может уже хватит многократно вносить ахинею со статусом дорог в базу проекта? Почитайте на досуге вот эти соглашения.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Дороги
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Highway_classification
Stalker61 (2023-07-16 18:02:26+00:00): Добрый день.
Может уже хватит многократно вносить ахинею со статусом дорог в базу проекта? Почитайте на досуге вот эти соглашения.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Дороги
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Highway_classification
TheSwavu (2023-07-09 09:31:20+00:00): Reverted geofiction mapping.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138289498
felipeeugenio (2023-07-09 23:34:44+00:00): Hola
Por favor explicar esta edición. Cuál es el verdadero nombre del supermercado?
Da la impresión de que está usando nombres genéricos.
Qué es exactamente lo que está reparando?
Va a reponer los números que ha borrado?

por favor responder mensajes.
saludos
felipeeugenio (2023-07-09 23:57:59+00:00): Por favor indicar si acaso las direcciones que borra son porque no existen. O es un error?
CurlingMan13 (2023-07-08 03:10:44+00:00): Do not make tempoary changes to the map purely for whatever you are doing with the export.  Instead, the data should be exported and manipulated in a sandbox, such that it does not affect the OSM database.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138249142
jptolosa (2023-07-10 04:40:20+00:00): Hola, hay varias direcciones que ya estaban agregadas y que has eliminado para volver a crearlas, lo cual se considera una mala práctica. Lo correcto sería simplemente mover ese punto de dirección hacia su sitio correcto.
Saludos.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138249222