piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2026-02-23 07:21:48+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/12420325478 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Custom home builder"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-03 17:33:02+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179314290
(No visible changes after review)
mueschel (2026-02-26 08:14:47+00:00): Hi,
could you check the objects you uploaded? Some look like your field notes, but not like properly tagged objects in OSM, e.g.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1482125168
sbachinin (2026-02-26 13:30:26+00:00): Hi. All added objects are real buildings. I took liberty of adding a dscrp tag for my own purposes and I'm going to remove these tags promptly. Is it totally unacceptable?
mueschel (2026-02-26 14:45:17+00:00): Hi,
some just have a "area=yes", but not a building tag.
You can add some descriptions, but better use a common tag. Either "note", if it is information for mappers, or "description" if it might also be useful for others. 
Some of the comments look like a bit too subjective to be of real use in OSM, but the real facts can for sure be there - and also deserve the proper tags like roof:material or building:colour.
NeisBot (2026-02-23 07:48:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13592100850 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Cleaning services building"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-03 17:33:04+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179314295
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-17 01:45:16+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with advertising/malformed tags and explicit source=* of Google Maps, which is not allowed by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ), in changeset 184205162

https://osm.org/changeset/184205162
HAALAND_ (2026-03-02 13:46:42+00:00): 公共卫生间为什么要编辑成shop=bathroom_furnishing标签?到底是公共卫生间还是用品店?
rhhs (2026-02-23 11:51:43+00:00): Hi, please consider if Баничарница is really the name of the shop, and not a description of it. I think I would tag it with noname=yes + description=Баничарница Unfortunately we don't have a better tag than shop=bakery for something as special as a Баничарница 
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions and https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/topic/134467/2
saintam1 (2026-02-23 21:55:28+00:00): shop=bakery + cuisine=banitsa perhaps?
Anonymous36863 (2026-02-25 07:02:21+00:00): > Hi, please consider if Баничарница is really the name of the shop, and not a description of it.

That's the name, and besides, removing the name would prevent CoMaps users from knowing that it sells banitsa.

> shop=bakery + cuisine=banitsa perhaps?

Not necessary, cuisine=banitsa is niche, it's better to use cuisine=balkan or cuisine=regional instead.
Fraxi (2026-02-25 07:22:40+00:00): Аз лично се съмнявам, че името е "Баничарница", дори и да има табела. По-скоро вероятно става дума за нарицателно име. Вижте за справка тази бележка:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5141668

Също например от някои страници в уикипедия може да се види, че "баничарница" се използва в такъв смисъл. Например:
https://bg.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A0%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B1%D0%BE%D0%B9%D0%BD%D0%B0_(%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82_%D0%A2%D1%8A%D1%80%D0%B3%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%89%D0%B5)
"В селото функционират кметство, три магазина за хранителни стоки, бистро, БАНИЧАРНИЦА, фризьорски салон, автосервиз." Има и на други места. Можете да замените ключа name= с description и така ще остане ясно, че става дума за баничарница. 
И отново, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_map_for_the_renderer
L'imaginaire (2026-03-10 10:26:36+00:00): Dag Jm8430,
Bedankt om dit aan te geven. Is dit de definitieve verkeerssituaties? Zijn er uitzonderingen op het eenrichtingsverkeer, bijvoorbeeld voor fietsers?
Jm8430 (2026-03-10 10:52:22+00:00): Hallo, 
Dit is al meer dan een jaar de definitieve verkeerssituatie (vast politiereglement). Dit is met een onderbord M12 of M18 dus uitgezonderd fietsers, bromfietsers klasse A en speedpedelecs.
Mvg
L'imaginaire (2026-03-11 12:08:39+00:00): Top, bedankt voor de info. Ik heb dit zo aangepast: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179695559
NeisBot (2026-02-23 08:39:41+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 13 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1013226608 v24 | 13 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178931737
pitscheplatsch (2026-02-23 09:00:46+00:00): In this case, it seems the reported issues are false positives. The geometries were not changed in a way that would introduce crossings, and the tagging adjustments did not create any new conflicts.

Sorry for the inconvenience, and thanks again for your map edits.

Regards,
Pascal
MappingMore (2026-02-24 12:34:13+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:178986638
hatul (2026-02-23 21:29:51+00:00): שלום
סימון שבילים הוא באמצעות יחס ולא עם נקודות אטרקציה ולכן הנקודות נמחקו.
אם יש סימון בשטח אז ניתן לסמן את השביל במפה.
תודה
SafwatHalaby (2026-02-23 13:05:42+00:00): שלום! המפה הציבורית לא מיועדת לנקודות אישיות. נא להימנע מזה
MappingMore (2026-02-24 11:13:37+00:00): Revert of 178924892
❤️‍🔥 (2026-02-25 08:49:53+00:00): please use changeset comments to describe your edits. It looks like you deleted a number of important tags and changed the university to a high school. 

Without no changeset comment or explanation, it is likely that someone will just revert strange edits like this
marc__marc (2026-02-25 14:20:57+00:00): Bonjour,
les relations ne sont pas des catégories.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Relations/Les_relations_ne_sont_pas_des_cat%C3%A9gories
Et d'ailleurs la relation ne forme pas une route fermée, ce sont chacun des 3 itinéraires séparément qui sont un itinéraire fermé
Si ces 3 relations ont le même opérateurs, il suffit de mettre l'attribut opérateur sur les 3 relations ou un attribut network.
par ailleurs le site web n'a pas l'air d'être le site web de ces pistes mais un outil de visualisation de toute les pistes
Il n'y a d'ailleurs pas moyen de sélectionné cet itinéraire sur le site, le moteur de recherche ne les trouve pas non plus.
c'est pourquoi il me semble que cette url n'est pas pertinente pour décrire spécifiquement ces pistes.
Cordialement,
Marc
ordinatous (2026-02-28 10:52:27+00:00): Bonjour je n'avais pas vu le commentaire.
J'ai ouvert un sujet sur le forum concernant ces pistes de fond et les relations.
Cdlt.
tastrax (2026-02-24 08:33:21+00:00): These tailings dams could be years away so I have changed the tagging to proposed:man_made=tailings_pond
mueschel (2026-02-24 19:33:57+00:00): Hi,
could you check these golf areas? Some of them have strange tags like "name_Org2" or strange names.

Thanks!
MappingMore (2026-02-24 08:13:52+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:178975535
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-23 09:57:12+00:00): Branch naming conflicts with OSM tagging guidelines. Awaiting DWG review.
Thomas-Munichways (2026-02-23 09:33:47+00:00): Kommentar Missgeschick beim hochladen. Bei der Blumenstraße ist seit kurzem Tempo 30 ohne zeitweise Einschränkungen. (Quelle Mapillary 2025).
aTarom (2026-02-23 15:38:41+00:00): Hola, los name acabados en "... - btt" son quizás "mtb:name"?
por ejemplo:
"Cerro De La Cueva - btt"?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1482146782/history
rempshaener (2026-02-23 18:32:23+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.
Eine kleine Anmerkung: Hydranten sollten nicht mit Straßen, Gebäuden u. ä. verbunden werden. Das lässt sich leicht beheben: im Editor markieren und „E“ drücken – das löst den Hydranten von der Linie.
Vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag und weiterhin viel Spaß beim Mappen.
Viele Grüße
habi (2026-02-23 09:21:32+00:00): No, closes https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5176956
mike140 (2026-02-23 09:42:33+00:00): Навіщо до addr:street додавати назву садівничого товариства?
habi (2026-02-23 09:38:03+00:00): Related to https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5177408
Bienson (2026-02-23 23:50:02+00:00): Korrigiert in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178965835
007Transformer (2026-02-23 09:43:04+00:00):  Partially reverted in changeset id: 178898262
NeisBot (2026-02-23 09:54:41+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 11 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1482156987 v1 | 10 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178934800
gscholz (2026-02-28 07:49:58+00:00): Hi  Alessio,
this error still exits:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=12.99814&lat=42.08351&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges

Can we get your feedback here?
Guido
qstep (2026-02-23 10:58:13+00:00): official_name=Koczka utca ?

Habár NTA is említi mindkét írásmódot - pont fordítva mint ahogy ki van táblázva :) -, az OEVK szerint "cz", és nincs "c": https://vtr.valasztas.hu/ogy2026/egyeni-valasztokeruletek/06/04/024/szavazohelyisegek/023?tab=szavazokor-adatai
itineris (2026-02-23 11:08:19+00:00): Ahogy érzed. Bár épp a kettősség miatt nekem mindkettő official. :)
stasiu512 (2026-02-23 11:33:33+00:00): Cześć, napisałem właśnie do BZRD w związku z uzupełnieniem oznakowania w tym miejscu -https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1482159927. Co do rowerzystów na chodniku to legalne to jest tylko w nielicznych przypadkach. Zakładam że problematyczny jest skręt w lewo w II Brygady od strony Kowal, tam faktycznie taki manewr wydaje się mało bezpieczny, jednak z reszty kierunków myślę, że problemu nie będzie.
Marek-M (2026-02-23 12:07:52+00:00): Dzięki za info. Faktycznie od Kowal raczej ten manewr skrętu jest niebezpieczny. Mam nadzieję, że m. Gdańsk ogarnie oznakowanie, bo teraz jest nielogiczne.

Chociaż drogowcy mogą nie widzieć błędu i uznać, że jest dwukierunkowa dla rowerzystów wyjeżdżających z tego podwórka - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1482195448

Sam jestem ciekaw jak zareagują. Dzięki za zaangażowanie :)👋
stasiu512 (2026-02-26 10:03:47+00:00): Cześć, dostałem odpowiedź na zgłoszenie - https://zglos.gdansk.pl/mcity/incidents/preview/id.453795/view.horizontal. Podsumowując nie będzie tabliczek od strony ul. Świętokrzyskiej ze względu na ryzyko zdarzeń drogowych, a tabliczka pod znakiem "droga jednokierunkowa" z drugiej strony zostanie tak jak zasugerowałeś dla dojeżdżających do punktów wzdłuż trasy. Trochę nie mam koncepcji i pewności jak to dobrze zmapować;)
Marek-M (2026-02-26 10:43:09+00:00): Chyba można to zostawić jak teraz jest zmapowane. Rowerzysta może prowadzić rower chodnikiem i na przejściu włączyć się do ruchu pod prąd na ul. II Brygady.

Jednocześnie żaden routing nie powinien zezwalać rowerzystom na wjazd w ul. II Brygady z ulicy, bo zabrania tego znak zakazu wjazdu bez wyjątków.
HSL_PALAUTE (2026-02-26 08:39:36+00:00): Hei, huomasimme että olet tässä ja useammassa muussakin muutoskokoelmassasi järjestelmällisen oloisesti lisännyt pihateille (highway=service) kulkurajoitteita access=private. Reittioppaan kannalta tämä on hieman ongelmallista, koska tällöin emme voi näitä väyliä hyödyntää lainkaan reitityksessä. Kyseisen tagin käytöstä pihateillä on myös taannoin ollut keskustelua OSM-foorumilla https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/yksityisalue-tai-lapikulku-kielletty-pihateiden-access-tageista/90357 ja yhteisön linjaus on sen suuntainen että access=private-tagi ei soveltuisi tällaisille kerrostalojen piha-alueiden huoltoteille käytettäväksi. Nähdäksemme sopivampi tapa asettaa kulkurajoitteita tällaisille olisi määrittää rajoitteet kulkutapakohtaisesti esim motor_vehicle=destination.

Ystävällisin terveisin
HSL_PALAUTE
TrickyFoxy (2026-04-03 23:01:09+00:00): https://osm.org/node/13591207601 хотя и рекламное агентство и промазали с координатами, судя по сайту всё-таки существует на этой улице

https://nastas.ru
literan (2026-04-05 10:37:07+00:00): ну ок, добавил
eggie (2026-02-23 11:03:09+00:00): Dag Voorstad,
Verwijderde adres heb ik hersteld..  
Graag adresnodes intact laten. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-02-23 10:58:29+00:00): Dag Voorstad. Beter geen gebouwen gaan aanpassen. Instellingen graag bijtaggen op de adresnode. Niet op de gebouwomtrek.
Ik heb de info overgezet.

MVG
eggie
Voorstad_EM (2026-02-23 11:03:02+00:00): Het gebouw is door de gemeente recent opgedeeld in losse units of duo-units, Hoe kan ik het best zorgen dat de twee units nu Hackerpsace Nijmegen zijn, en niet het hele gebouw?
eggie (2026-02-23 11:09:01+00:00): Hoi,

Dat hoeft niet. Mocht het gebouw in e data van het Kadaster opnieuw ingedeeld zijn en nog niet verwerkt in de BAG dan kun je dat doorgeven aan de BAG middels deze site.
Maar de meeste gebouwen worden door het Kadaster niet ingedeeld in aparte units. 
De poi met leisure=hackerspace staat op de juiste plaats. 
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/?searchQuery=winkelsteegseweg+209&objectId=0268200000043003&theme=BRT+Achtergrond&geometry.x=184551.451&geometry.y=425238.8495&zoomlevel=15

Alle gebouwen zijn directe import vanuit de BAG. Bij herimport wordt alles weer overschreven. Iets aanpassen heeft dus geen zin.
CTRL-F5 een paar keer voor het effect. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-02-23 11:11:13+00:00): Zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dhackerspace
eggie (2026-02-23 11:15:11+00:00): Evt kun je wel precies over het gebouw
twee units building:part=yes intekenen. 
De buidling=yes laat je dan intact. building:part rendert niet, maar daar kun je wel info in kwijt zoals hoogte e.d. 
Maar dus niet de naam en de functie. Dat hoort op de adresnode.
Groet,
eggie
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-04-16 03:21:34+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13592389994/history - czemu to i inne dostało railway:ref=Pd ?

Nie wiem co to za kod, ale nie jest to raczej żaden identyfikator tego konkretnego obiektu
tomzyl (2026-04-16 11:30:02+00:00): W ramach budowy nowych linii powstaną nowe posterunki odgałęźne. Podłęże ma symbol Pd.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-04-16 11:58:06+00:00): ale to nie jest kod tego szczególnego skrzyżowania kolejowego chyba?
tomzyl (2026-04-16 12:02:06+00:00): Po prawdzie, można by obecnie to usunąć. Początki linii są oznaczone w projektach jako Podłęże R401 i R301 (drugiego numeru nie jestem pewien). Na samym Podłężu mamy też PZS R101 oraz PZS R201 jako takie samo oznakowanie. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3580395993
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3528444359
NeisBot (2026-02-23 10:36:41+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 11 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1188362523 v4 | 6 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1188362522 v2 | 4 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178936665
Udarian (2026-02-23 16:14:57+00:00): does this mean that the Ross is no longer there?

Happy Mapping,
Udar.
NikoNomas (2026-03-01 20:35:27+00:00): Five Below (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13592432401) is on the ground floor (international floor 0).

Ross (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/301241459) is located directly above Five Below, on first and second elevated floors, or international floors 1 and 2.

Both locales share the same street address of 230 Lincoln Road.

How to integrate this properly into OSM?
JeroenHoek (2026-02-23 16:51:30+00:00): Zou je in je changeset-commentaar kunnen aangeven wat je wijzigt? Alleen '.' is niet zo handig.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
CeesKoek (2026-02-24 15:05:57+00:00): Je hebt helemaal gelijk, niet bij nagedacht.
Bedankt.
george1201 (2026-02-23 23:39:52+00:00): Hallo Corinna H, willkommen in OSM.
Ich habe eine Frage zu deiner Änderung: Warum darf ich als Fußgänger nicht am Fahrbandrand einer Landesstraße laufen? Die STVO verbietet es doch nicht, oder?
eggie (2026-02-23 11:36:58+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback .. Lijkt me oke als dit de naam van het gebouw is. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-02-23 11:40:54+00:00): Hoi..  Beetje muggezifterij. 
Website altijd met http  beginnen. 
https://hackerspacenijmegen.nl/Hackerspace_Nijmegen
Format openingstijden gaf een foutmelding.
Ik heb het aangepast.

MVG
eggie
pitscheplatsch (2026-02-23 15:49:40+00:00): Spam?
qstep (2026-02-23 18:19:26+00:00): Yes. Removed and reported.
pitscheplatsch (2026-02-23 19:21:12+00:00): Thanks @qstep
habi (2026-02-25 19:28:31+00:00): Hey
Bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/319243010/history ist wohl ein Fehler beim Addressdaten-Kopieren passiert.
Nörtershausen ist ca. 700 km weit weg :)
Ich hab' das in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179054263 korrigiert.
Gruss,
Habi
wies1 (2026-02-26 12:04:43+00:00): Hallo habi,
vielen Dank fürs Korrigieren. Da muss echt was in der Zwischenablage bei mir "liegen geblieben" sein.
Eine Frage:
Wie hast du diesen Fehler gefunden ? Overpass Turbo ?
Gruss
wies1
habi (2026-02-26 13:40:56+00:00): Im OSM-Forum war gestern die Rede von `addr:`-Tags.
Da habe ich https://taginfo.openstreetmap.ch/keys/addr%3Apostcode#values für die Schweiz angeschaut, und die (in diesem Fall) fünfstellige PLZ ist mir aufgefallen.
NeisBot (2026-02-23 11:27:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13592445524 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Review platform office"
---
Наприклад, більш нейтральна й фактична версія вашого тексту могла б бути: "Огляд платформи офісу"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
Fizzie-DWG (2026-02-24 04:42:23+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19838
aTarom (2026-02-23 15:20:25+00:00): Hola, bienvenido a OSM, no hay comentario en el conjunto de cambios y se están añadiendo etiquetas extrañas, que tratas de mapear? Carriles?
Me dices, saludos.
aTarom (2026-02-23 16:16:46+00:00): Procedo a revertir los cambios, cualquier problema me dices, lo comento en el grupo local en
https://t.me/osmcat/71813
Saludos
pitscheplatsch (2026-02-27 12:16:10+00:00): In my opinion, all changesets of this contributor should be reverted.
Yog Sot (2026-02-23 17:23:57+00:00): a dlaczego akurat rowery mają zakaz na  way 602946974 ?
Poprawiam po tobie poprawiam. Jak jest jakiś specyficzny zakaz, to on faktycznie musi być
gwiazdakosza (2026-02-25 06:35:44+00:00): rzeczywiście, moja pomyłka. wybacz, będę bardziej ostrożny i uważny
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-23 13:34:02+00:00): Branch naming conflicts with OSM tagging guidelines. Awaiting DWG review.
MappingMore (2026-02-24 10:32:28+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:178981154
empty_child (2026-02-23 19:24:08+00:00): Добрый день
Какого рода заведение вы хотели добавить?
Henry572 (2026-03-13 08:01:40+00:00): Hello Хранители,

may I ask where the name "Schildkröten Sonnenterasse" comes from? Often having been there, I have never heard any reference to turtles, but maybe it's new.

Hendrik
pedr0faria (2026-02-24 22:35:40+00:00): Error corrected. I've already removed the cluster of buildings. Sorry.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178940503
pedr0faria (2026-02-24 22:45:04+00:00): Error corrected. I've already removed the cluster of buildings. Sorry.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178940503
Fraxi (2026-02-23 14:25:29+00:00): Здравейте! 
Хубаво е, че сте добавили сградите. Моля да упоменете все пак като източник АГКК -явно данните са внесени оттам. И по принцип не вписваме "ул." пред името на улицата в адреса.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bg:WikiProject_Bulgaria#%D0%98%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B0_%D0%BD%D0%B0_%D1%83%D0%BB%D0%B8%D1%86%D0%B8_%D0%B8_%D0%B1%D1%83%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B4%D0%B8
ssundell (2026-03-07 20:48:51+00:00): Moi! Jos tarkkoja ollaan, esim. Myllykyläntie näyttää olevan valtion tie numero 12587 ja Vuotavantie 12575, joten niille oikeampi luokka olisi tertiary.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178940825
EräsHenkilö (2026-07-26 10:32:57+00:00): Näitä tienumeroita ei ollutkaan karttaan merkitty. Saat toki laittaa unsigned_ref-tagin, jos tiedät millä välillä nuo tienumerot ovat.

Viisinumeroisia yhdysteitä (näitä ei alunperin yhdysteiksi kutsuttukaan, eikä ole koskaan maastoon numeroitu) merkitsisin tapauskohtaisen harkinnan perusteella onko unclassified vai tertiary parempi. Pitäisi varmaan käydä laajempaa keskustelua tästä, niin en ole lähtenyt muuttamaan vaikka joku olisi tertiaryksi merkinnyt (nykyisen ohjeen mukaan) vaikkei omaan silmään sopisikaan. Useimmiten toki sopii.
NeisBot (2026-02-23 12:18:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13592602313 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "CBD Shop"
---
Zum Beispiel könnte eine neutralere und sachlichere Version deines Textes lauten: "CBD Shop"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
pitscheplatsch (2026-02-23 15:39:57+00:00): Hi, 

danke für die bereits erfolgte Änderung. Es war aber die Beschreibung (description) und nicht der Name Eures Shops gemeint.

Viele Grüße
Pascal
007Transformer (2026-02-24 09:06:26+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: 178977623