piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
HansWürstchen (2023-02-25 18:24:13+00:00): Da Du ja auf direkte Nachrichten genauso wenig reagierst wie auf CS Kommentare nochmal auf diesem Weg.
Es ist nicht zielführend, wenn Du Addressen zusätzlich zu der Erfassung am Gebäude als Node erfasst, und das fehlerhafte tagging macht es nicht besser.

Es wäre schön, wenn Du Dich zu Deinen Beweggründen äussern könntest.
MfG!
kohlibri88 (2023-02-25 18:41:21+00:00): Für manche Auswertungen benötigtigt man einfach nur Punkte als Adresskoordinaten und für andere ist es wichtig, dass die Informationen am Polygon hängen.
HansWürstchen (2023-02-25 18:51:49+00:00): Das mag vielleicht sein, aber das ist dann ein Problem des Renderers und nicht das von OSM, und desswegen beides zu erfassen und die Datenbank mit Nodes zu fluten kann ja nicht Sinn und Zweck der Sache sein, und zum auswerten wäre es günstig wenn das tagging an den Nodes auch noch passen würde, ansonsten bezweifel ich das es funktioniert.
Zumal mapping für den Renderer, nach meinem Kenntnisstand, explizit nicht erwünscht ist.
kohlibri88 (2023-02-25 18:57:24+00:00): Ich habe daran gedacht, wenn die Daten für eigene Projekte herunterladen werden. Dann sind die Adressen an den Häusern in der Flächentabelle.Für manche Auswertung möchte man aber nur die Tabelle mit den Points verwenden.
HansWürstchen (2023-02-25 19:11:31+00:00): Das mag alles sein, aber dann sollte man die "Projekte" an die Datenbank anpassen und nicht die Datenbank an die "Projekte", Stichwort: Mappen für den Render.
Wenn jeder Mapper die Datenbank so bearbeiten würde wie es für ihn am besten passt, dann wäre nichts einheitlich, und Du könntest Dich nicht darauf verlassen, das, dass , was im einen Ort ein EFH ist, nicht im nächten Ort eine Kläranlage ist, oder eine Autobahn ein Verkehrsberuhigter Bereich, weil es so besser aussah. Das funzt nicht.
kohlibri88 (2023-02-25 19:20:29+00:00): Was ist denn nun der "richtige Weg" Adresse als Punkte oder ans Polygon. Ich kann auch all meine Änderungen
löschen.
HansWürstchen (2023-02-25 22:14:10+00:00): Hallo, nochmal.
Ist beides einzeln nicht grundsätzlich falsch, gleichzeitig jedoch schon.
Laut wiki: (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=DE:Key:addr:*&uselang=de#Wo_wird_die_Adresse_hinzugef%C3%BCgt)
, weitestgehend am Polygon, Ausnahmen sind dort aber auch ausgeführt, man sollte sich aber immer am üblichen tagging in einer Region orientieren, das kann auch mal abweichen, dient dann aber der Vergleichbarkeit, in diesem Fall hieße das aber auch am Polygon..., was auch der Übersichtlichkeit dient.

MfG!
mavl (2023-04-23 16:10:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:09:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:52:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:03:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:58:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:11:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:57:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:06:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:52:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
DaveF (2023-02-26 10:54:42+00:00): Hi
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1149478153#map=19/51.48926/-2.44964

Could you clarify why you slit this small section & not given it a PROW ref?
DaveF (2023-02-26 11:12:24+00:00): Hi
Similarly for this short section.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1149478154#map=19/51.49156/-2.46166

Please don't join two paths to a barrier/stile etc as routing software will state that the gate has to be passed through to walk from the footway to the track, which, in the real world is unnecessary.  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3522700512
patthoyts (2023-02-26 21:42:57+00:00): For the first one - because there is a gap on the South Gloucestershire definitive map data between LPU 48,49 and LPU 47. This can be seen on the overlays at https://osm.mathmos.net/prow/progress/south-gloucs/-/pucklechurch/ or when importing the footpath data as an overlay for JOSM.
For the second point - that makes some sense. I'll bear that in mind.
DaveF (2023-02-26 22:22:22+00:00): 1. I really think that can be put down to poor representation by the local authorities. I get the impression it's a job given to the junior/intern. I don't think OSM should copy their lack of detail.

2. Thanks.
trigpoint (2023-02-27 18:52:41+00:00): Whilst this is not the correct way to map rights of way in a OSM, we should map what is on the ground (best from a survey) which often differs from the definitive map. 
Rights of way do legally end when a path enters highway land, it is not poor mapping by the local authority, the definitive map has different requirements to OSM, it is a legal document and reflects that legal status.
DaveF (2023-02-28 12:53:46+00:00): "Rights of way do legally end when a path enters highway land,"

That's interesting. Do you have any details?
DaveF (2023-03-02 18:46:16+00:00): This is the definitive statements for the three paths in the S. Glos's records.
https://snipboard.io/nq1P40.jpg
mavl (2023-04-23 15:55:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:48:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:12:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:10:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:07:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:06:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:02:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:09:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:06:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:07:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:12:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:50:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:08:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:12:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:08:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:56:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:04:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:54:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:50:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:04:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:08:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:07:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:08:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:53:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:00:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:05:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:06:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:07:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:56:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:07:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:57:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:11:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
porfiriopaiz (2023-02-26 19:14:46+00:00): Hola Selmira.

Te saluda porfiriopaiz contribuidor de OpenStreetMap en Nicaragua.

Antes que nada, quiero agradecerte por las con contribuciones que has realizado al agregar diferente edificios al mapa.

También quería hacer la siguiente observación:

https://i.imgur.com/1VKTS2q.png

En su gran mayoría los edificios que has agregado presentan una geometría irregular, que según la imagen satelital de fondo indica que estos son edificios de forma rectangular.

https://imgur.com/a/Wp2LiB1

He corregido la geometría de los edificios que has agregado en este conjunto de cambios.

Te invito a leer la documentación del editor iD en su apartado que aborda cómo agregar edificios de forma rectangular y cómo corregir irregularidades al momento de dibujarlos.

https://learnosm.org/en/hot-tips/tracing-rectangular-buildings/

Espero ver una mejora en futuras contribuciones, de lo contrario me veré en la obligación de revertir las contribuciones realizadas con el fin de mantener la calidad en los elementos del mapa.

Si tienes alguna duda, consulta o sugerencia, no dudes en contactarme.

Saludos y feliz mapeo.

porfiriopaiz
porfiriopaiz (2023-02-26 21:26:57+00:00): Hola Selmira.

Acá puedes apreciar los cambios que se realizaron a los elementos que has agregado al mapa:

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=133056207

Saludos.
Porfirio
mavl (2023-04-23 16:05:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:10:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:52:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:53:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:06:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
gscholz (2023-02-27 09:57:15+00:00): Hi busnotturno95,
can you please contribute to the conversation here?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132803419
Guidi
mavl (2023-04-23 16:03:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
MxxCon (2023-02-26 00:50:58+00:00): Hello.
What do you mean by "name" in your changeset? That kind of message doesn't help others understand what you are editing.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133019628
mariotomo (2023-02-26 09:12:27+00:00): they meant "name:tt".
but it cost time to check what they meant, please mention the trailing ":tt" explicitly next times.
mavl (2023-04-23 15:55:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
emersonveenstra (2023-02-25 20:44:50+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for your contribution! A few notes:

Did you mean to change this building to landuse? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/822791080#map=18/42.52740/-83.03205
You have a typo in the state here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1033742118#map=19/42.53439/-83.03005
Are you sure both the postcode and housenumber are the same here? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/822791083#map=18/42.52728/-83.02994
Scott McKee (2023-02-25 23:10:55+00:00): Thanks for double checking these!  You are correct about all of them.  They should be updated/fixed now
emersonveenstra (2023-02-25 23:22:44+00:00): Awesome, thanks for fixing them!
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-07-30 11:40:13+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10693633378/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
Binnette (2025-07-30 12:26:09+00:00): Hi Mateusz, this is a fresh water intake point, but I don't know which tags to use. Note you can not drink water here so it is not man_made=spring_box.
Do you have some idea, how to map this ?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-07-30 15:49:14+00:00): "fresh water intake point" - is it a spring? water tap? Place where you can get water from stream?

Is it a drinkable water?

only path is nearby, so https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dwater_point is unlikely

(BTW, you can take photo and attach it to note with StreetComplete which helps in such cases)
monotar (2023-02-26 02:58:25+00:00): wieso wird https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14222672/history gelöscht???? Das ist ein namentlich bekanntes Gewerbegebiet. Stattdessen wird leer gelassen. Bullshit Edit.
eggie (2023-02-25 20:53:51+00:00): Dag Lou... Lijkt me oke..
Die foutmeldingen heb ik opgelost door de nodes van dat stuk covered=yes vast te maken aan het gebouw.

De weg over het terrein heb ik op access=private met emergency=yes gezet.

Je edits
warnings:crossing_ways:building-highway

MVG
eggie
monotar (2023-02-26 17:58:37+00:00): warum sollte ein einzeln eingezeichneter Abfallhof commercial sein, denkst du hier ist nur ein Büro? Völliger Nonsens und das soll eine Verbesserung sein???
eggie (2023-02-25 20:59:40+00:00): Lijkt me oke...  old_name  zou wellicht beter description= kunnen worden, want het zal niet de naam van het gebouw zijn geweest, maar de functie.
Bij de adresnode op het nieuwe complex heb ik source=BAG teruggezet. Die code is nodig bij periodieke updates.
De verwijderde oprit is in werkelijk ook niet weg denk ik? 

Mapse
eggie
LockOnGuy (2023-02-25 20:47:10+00:00): Please don’t add your private home like this…
Johnny Mapperseed (2023-02-25 20:28:29+00:00): Meant bing sat imagery
MrMoehritz (2023-03-05 18:24:26+00:00): Hallo krifon,

du hast um eine Review gebeten: sieht gut aus, danke fürs updaten.

Da hab ich wieder einen neuen Ort in Edingen entdeckt :-)

Mo
DaveF (2023-03-07 00:25:46+00:00): Hi
Could you clarify what 'Goals' are?
Harel M (2023-05-02 20:26:10+00:00): Hi, It seems like the image link you have added here is partial.
Do you have a link to the relevant image or is this a mistake?
hatul (2023-05-03 06:11:58+00:00): fixed
Dakon (2023-03-22 19:02:17+00:00): Du hast das "Deutsche Haus" in die Polizeischule in der Wennigser Mark kopiert wie es aussieht. Außerdem haben beide noch "amenity=restaurant", so dass es jetzt ein POI ohne Gebäude gibt. Das war beides wahrscheinlich keine Absicht, oder?
Hansekogge48 (2023-03-25 21:24:10+00:00): Dakon, danke für Deinen Hinweis. Nachvollziehen kann ich den von mir gemachten Fehler nicht mehr. Ich hoffe jetzt ist es O.K.
Dir noch ein schönes Wochenende
Gruß Uwe