piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2024-03-13 15:00:40+00:00): Dag Bendenb

Je zegt een fietspad, maar er staat een C1 bord muv tweewielers en nog wat.
Dan was het toch correct getagd hier. 
Maar staat er ook een bord fietspad?
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=148595290

We taggen alleen fietspad bij een G11, 13 , 12a bord.
Graag reactie. 
eggie
eggie (2024-03-13 15:01:10+00:00): maxspeed 50 op een fietspad?
eggie (2024-03-13 15:12:07+00:00): Ik kan verkeersbesluit vinden die een fietspad rechtvaardigen.
Wel een Gemeentebesluit tot autovrijmaken van dit stuk Zoutmanstraat, maar dat was hier al goed gemapt.
eggie (2024-03-13 15:15:09+00:00): typo Ik kan GEEN  verkeersbesluit vinden...
eggie (2024-03-13 15:38:03+00:00): reverted by changeset Wijzigingenset #148599934

Ik heb de oude 'nieuwe' situatie hersteld.  Wanneer dit werkelijk een fietspad is geworden dan zal het alles aangepast moeten worden. Het was nu inconsistent gemapt.
C1 (Wit bord rode rand)  vehicle=no
incl de uitzonderingen.
Het routeert hier dus al goed voor fietsers.
Laat maar weten als de bebording is veranderd.
Het oorspronkelijke plan was trouwens een voetgangersgebied hier.
Groet
eggie
Bendenb (2024-03-13 16:36:39+00:00): Bedankt voor je actie. Voortaan ga ik eerst bij jou te rade voor ik iets wijzig.
Xvtn (2024-03-19 15:00:47+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes here. Everything looks good to me, no complaints! Thanks for your contributions!
gscholz (2024-03-20 09:22:14+00:00): Hi pfg21,
this changeset has created some errors regarding self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=69.84485&lat=58.58968&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=148595754

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
pfg21 (2024-03-21 08:22:29+00:00): Thank you for your attention. Fixed it.
gileri (2024-03-13 21:36:46+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue sur OSM !

J'ai du mal à comprendre ce que vous avez cartographié, notamment avec https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11727646274 qui dénote un début de sentier "nature".

Merci pour votre aide
gileri (2024-03-16 11:06:12+00:00): Modifications annulées ici : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148726413
Miroslav Suchý (2024-03-23 20:30:21+00:00): Hele ten rozcestník u žst Dobrovice jsi opravdu viděl? Protože já tam byl před dvouma týdnama a žádný rozcestník tam nebyl. Jenom čtvercová značka ukončující trasu.
opendcc (2024-03-13 15:41:57+00:00): Hello,
I find the node 'ramp' questionable: The wiki says: 'Use leisure=stadium to tag major sports', things look different here ...

best regards
DaveF (2024-04-19 18:50:11+00:00): Hi
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/node/1259779686
FYI These nodes are not platforms.
bxl-forever (2024-03-13 14:26:42+00:00): Bonjour,
Est-ce définitif ou situation provisoire pour travaux ou test ?
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-04 15:33:00+00:00): 

Hello!

Note that you do not need to add description of feature type as a name.
For example when mapping tree it is enough to specify that it is a tree, no need for putting that name of this specific tree is "Tree" (or "Arbre", in French).

So for buildings it is not needed to put Bâtiment as their name.

Or do you maybe know that this specific object mapped at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1262211665 is specifically named with such name?

Do not worry too much about this issue - I made way worse mistakes when I was starting. Maybe some tool or explanation is confusing? Why you added this name? Note that I am asking as maybe something can be fixed to be less confusing.

And if it was mistake - can you edit map to remove this name?
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-08 08:47:19+00:00): Thanks for a fix!
yelisey90 (2024-03-15 08:34:06+00:00): What's the purpose of removing surfaces from roads?
yelisey90 (2024-04-22 20:37:43+00:00): no reply, reverted for ways 171769676, 1103419177, 1194942977: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150365313
emersonveenstra (2024-03-14 11:53:43+00:00): Hi there,

Looks like this changeset disconnected West Avenue K from South 9th Street: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11727730907#map=18/32.93634/-103.35941

Was that intentional?
End0fLine (2024-03-15 00:44:08+00:00): I actually just noticed that while I was adding stop signs. Thanks for the heads up! It has been fixed.
zaizone (2024-03-16 10:15:56+00:00): Bonjour, je me suis permis de restaurer cet imposant marché de Yamoussoukro, que vous aviez probablement supprimé par erreur https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1145219536/history
Bonne cartographie
Zoura (2024-03-22 13:16:13+00:00): Bonjour Zaizone,
J'ai bien reçu votre commentaire et je tiens m'excuser car cette surpression a été faites par inattention
Merci Bien
silversurfer83 (2024-03-13 16:38:10+00:00): Hi there :)

just a little heads up: When editing with rapid please check with other aerials, too. In Germany many states allow us to use their orthophotos which are in gerneral more recent than bing and they are very accurately aligned. Also some states offer the cadastral background, too.

Maybe revisit this edit to see the difference between bing and hesse DOP

cheers
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148597495
StpnGeorg (2024-03-14 16:43:17+00:00): 👍 reverted
yelisey90 (2024-03-15 08:28:26+00:00): Hi! Were these roads improved recently? At least last year, for example, the road https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/485858966 was barely seen in the grass. So it's grade5 only.
yelisey90 (2024-04-22 19:58:03+00:00): no reply, so reverted: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150363927
eggie (2024-03-13 19:12:40+00:00): Hou Martijn, maar waarom heb je de hoofdrijbaan opengesteld voor fietsers?
Waarom emergency=yes op een reguliere weg. Dat is toch default
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=148597617

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-03-13 19:15:35+00:00): bicycle=use_sidepath heb ik hersteld.

... of wil je de afslagbeperking aanpassen zodat hulpdiensten wel linksaf mogen slaan op de kruising met de J van Campenlaan? 

Kortom .. wat is je bedoeling?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-03-13 19:17:29+00:00): emergency=yes heb ik verwijderd.

Bij uitzondering van een afslagbeperking tag je in de relatie except=emergency erbij
eggie (2024-03-13 19:19:22+00:00): Dat laatste heb ik toegevoegd op de afslagbeperking
eggie (2024-03-13 15:23:39+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback   Het trottoir was hier al getagd met sidewalk=right in de tagging van de hoofdrijbaan. 
Langsliggende trottoirs wordejn in de regel opgenomen in de hoofdrijbaan, behalve als er bv een groenstrook tussen ligt.
Verder heb je Oliemolensingel 33A op een ander pand gezet, maar dat is toch niet 33A?
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=148598645

Wanneer je overal paralleltrottoirs apart gaat intekenen zal de kaart niet meer goed routeren. 
MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-03-13 15:29:17+00:00): Beste Luuk Ik heb de oude situatie hersteld. Het was hier correct gemapt.

MVG
eggie
LuukWerf (2024-03-13 15:30:06+00:00): Ik zag dat het trottoir al getagd was met sidewalk=right, maar nu was en opeens een schuine lijn van het trottoir naar de singel, wat niet accuraat is, bij de rest van dit deel van de singel is het trottoir er ook naast getagd, dus dat leek mij hier een stuk logischer en mooier. Het verplaatsen van 33A is per ongeluk gegaan, dat was niet de bedoeling
eggie (2024-03-13 15:47:07+00:00): Dag Luuk,

Die schuine lijn zou je nog  kunnen aanpassen. Sos is het schipperen om de werkelijkheid te tekenen. Overigens is het niet verboden om langsliggende trottoirs in te tekenen, maar houd in je achterhoofd dat het niet gebruikelijk is.  Echt consensus is er niet over. Meestal routeert het ook niet goed, want je stapt immers van het trottoir zo de weg op. Wanneer je ergens dan moet oversteken krijg je in de routering enorme omwegen. dat is de reden dat ze opgenomen worden in de hoofdrijbaan. Alleen de standaardkaart laat dat nog niet zien.
Almere is een voorbeeld waar niets meer routeert en je op elk trottoir 'gevangen' zit. 
Waar jij het voetpad had ingetekend ligt overigens de fietsstrook. 
Probeer de PDOK actueel in te stellen als achtergrond. Dat kan in editmodus ergens recht in het scherm. Omdat je dicht bij Duitsland zit krijg je de 'verkeerde' luchtfoto.
Mapse
eggie
eggie (2024-03-13 15:50:21+00:00): Voorbeeld van verkeerde routering. Bij Blijdenstein en nr 27 kon je met jouw tagging  plots niet meer oversteken naar de 'crossing' tussen de wegen. Nu weer wel.
eggie (2024-03-13 15:52:41+00:00): Maar laat je niet weerhouden door kritiek.. 😀
user_125718 (2024-04-02 20:25:37+00:00): Eigentlich sollten die Beschreibungen/Texte bei Schlüsseln ohne Sprachpostfix (z:B. ":en") wie opening_hours in der jeweiligen Landesprache sein.

Außerdem ist die Halle ohne zusätzliches "open" bei Kommentaren nicht geöffnet, sondern der Öffnungsstatus ist unbekannt. Das habe ich früher aber auch falsch gemacht und inzwischen die Doku für alle verbessert. Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours
os-emmer (2024-03-13 16:50:57+00:00): Hello at_bus,
you just edited here something that is tagged with emergency=ses_station:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/380886929
This tag is deprecated. Can you maybe check if this place should instead be tagged with emergency=disaster_response?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:emergency%3Ddisaster_response

If you are not sure that is fine. Than we can just keep it as it is. Thanks in advance.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-06 04:23:44+00:00): Hello!

    Note that you do not need to add description of feature type as a name.
    For example when mapping tree it is enough to specify that it is a tree, no need for putting that name of this specific tree is "Tree".

    So for buildings it is not needed to put House as their name.

    Or do you maybe know that this specific object mapped at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/309260547 is specifically named with such name?

    Do not worry too much about this issue - I made way worse mistakes when I was starting. Maybe some tool or explanation is confusing? Why you added this name? Note that I am asking as maybe something can be fixed to be less confusing.

    And if it was mistake - can you edit map to remove this name?
eggie (2024-03-13 15:38:59+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
alexey_zakharenkov (2024-03-17 19:24:52+00:00): Пожалуйста, добавляйте к названию жилого комплекса слова "ЖК" или "жилой комплекс". Просто name=Клевер на объекте landuse содержит мало информации.
tordans (2024-03-14 15:30:01+00:00): Hallo Fridobär, danke für die Ergänzung. Ein Hinweis zu dem Access-Tags: Es ist üblich so wenig wie möglich davon zu vergeben und sie soweit wie möglich auf die impliziten Defaults zu verlassen. Bei einem "highway=path" ist bspw. implizit, dass er nur für Fuß und ggf. Radverkehr gedacht ist. VG und frohes Mappen
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148599921
leofra31 (2024-11-01 17:38:51+00:00): Bonjour mab_,
Vous avez indiqué les pistes cyclables comme étant à sens unique mais elles apparaissent comme étant à double sens sur les images de rue, il y a-t-il une signalétique qui m'aurait échappé?
Bonne soirée 
Leofra31
mab_ (2024-11-19 22:29:30+00:00): À l'origine lorsque ces bandes étaient à double sens, il y avait à chaque fois deux pictogrammes de vélo "tête-bêche", pour être "lisible" quelque soit le sens de circulation. Depuis que ces bandes ont été mises en sens unique, un pictogramme sur deux a été "effacé" (on voit au sol les traces d'effacement).

De plus, côté nord-ouest, sur un candélabre à proximité du feu tricolore, on trouve un panneau B9b interdisant la circulation aux vélo sur la bande nord dans le sens ouest-est.
leofra31 (2024-11-20 23:04:06+00:00): Ah oui, je viens de regarder sur street vie, et il semble que les marquages n'ont pas étés effacés à certains endroits (notamment aux endroits apparaissant sur panoramax). Merci pour l'explication
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-06 05:24:21+00:00): Hello!

Note that you do not need to add description of feature type as a name.
For example when mapping tree it is enough to specify that it is a tree, no need for putting that name of this specific tree is "Tree".

So for buildings it is not needed to put house as their name.

Or do you maybe know that this specific object mapped at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1262236740 is specifically named with such name?

And if it was mistake - can you edit map to remove this name?
    
Do not worry too much about this issue - I made way worse mistakes when I was starting. Maybe some tool or explanation is confusing? Why you added this name? Note that I am asking as maybe something can be fixed to be less confusing.
Frans S (2024-03-22 11:47:16+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
A remark about mapping highways
How to decide when a trace is a path or an unclassified highway
First, look what they connect.  Houses, settlements, villages. Then measure the width of that trace.
In iDeditor 

Shortcut : Ctrl+⇧ Shift+M – toggle  opens measurement panel
Draw a line between the shoulders of a trace (zoom in very far) and read the distance.
If a trace is max 2 meters wide, tag it as a path.
Wider and connect hamlets, houses and villages should be tagged as unclassified.
Tag residential in urban areas (villages, towns)
In JOSM, use the measure tab, or draw a circle (round building, shortcut Alt-Z when the building plugin is installed)) between the shoulders of a trace and read the distance on the lower toolbar. (remove the circle after that)

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/East_Africa_Tagging_Guidelines
This is mentioned about tracks on the
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Routing#Routing_considerations

Quote: Tracks are roads of agricultural purpose. They usually connect fields to farms. The surface sometimes makes them inaccessible for regular cars, or at least limits the speeds to a very slow pace. Tracks should always be avoided for through-going traffic or within urban areas.
Damian05 (2024-03-13 15:58:57+00:00): Usunięcie nieaktualnych adresów i sklepów, przesunięcie punktu Pascal
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-13 21:51:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 148614460 where the changeset comment is: revert apparently fictional edits
Damian05 (2024-03-13 16:03:50+00:00): Dodano budynek w budowie, poprawiono linię zabudowy mieszkaniowej
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-13 21:52:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 148614460 where the changeset comment is: revert apparently fictional edits
emersonveenstra (2024-03-14 11:48:35+00:00): Hi there,

Thanks for the additions! Please see the wiki page for how to properly tag sawmills: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:industrial=sawmill?uselang=en you need to also add landuse=industrial, and it's best if it's an area, not a point. Would you mind fixing this (and the other ones)? Thanks!
Frans S (2024-03-19 09:06:06+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
When you map roads and  they cross other roads/paths, don't forget to connect them with a node.
Best regards and keep mapping
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-13 21:52:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 148614460 where the changeset comment is: revert apparently fictional edits
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-13 21:51:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 148614460 where the changeset comment is: revert apparently fictional edits
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-13 21:52:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 148614460 where the changeset comment is: revert apparently fictional edits
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-13 21:51:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 148614460 where the changeset comment is: revert apparently fictional edits
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-13 21:51:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 148614460 where the changeset comment is: revert apparently fictional edits
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-13 21:51:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 148614460 where the changeset comment is: revert apparently fictional edits
Qwajo OSM (2024-04-03 17:01:42+00:00): Since greater part of the building is in your task tile, be sure to map out the entire building at all times. The mapper mapping the next tile might not map it due to the smaller portion visible to them. Thank you for mapping
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-13 21:52:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 148614460 where the changeset comment is: revert apparently fictional edits
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-13 21:51:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 148614460 where the changeset comment is: revert apparently fictional edits
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-13 21:52:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 148614460 where the changeset comment is: revert apparently fictional edits
Xvtn (2024-03-19 14:58:58+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Since you requested a review, I looked over your change here. Looks great to me, no complaints! Thanks for your contributions!
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-13 21:52:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 148614460 where the changeset comment is: revert apparently fictional edits
igor2 (2024-03-13 19:08:08+00:00): Forgot the URL:

https://aanekoski.asio.fi/onlinekalenteri/aanekoski/guest.php?kt=tila&laji=Ulkoliikuntatilat&sijainti=SUMU&jn=LI&ctila=57
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-13 21:52:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 148614460 where the changeset comment is: revert apparently fictional edits
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-13 21:51:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 148614460 where the changeset comment is: revert apparently fictional edits
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-13 21:52:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 148614460 where the changeset comment is: revert apparently fictional edits
mcld (2024-05-25 15:07:07+00:00): Hi - thanks for updating Leiden! The new restaurant on Breestraat 117, is it really called "Stadslokaal Burgerzaken"? There's a different place nearby (Breestraat 123) called "Burgerzaken", and when I passed 117 today it just said "Stadslokaal". So - are you confident about the name you added?
mcld (2024-05-26 17:03:48+00:00): (coincidentally (?) someone else already changed this name now)
ilcuoco57 (2024-05-28 17:46:05+00:00): Thanks mcld. The name was indicated as Stadslokaal Burgerzaken at the time, but it was a bit unclear back then (it was just opened; and they did not yet have a website at the time). It is a "sister" of Burgerzaken a bit further down Breestraat. But it seems corrected indeed, thanks for pointing it out.
DaanLT (2024-03-14 06:06:49+00:00): šitas pastatas pagal regia neturi namo numerio, taigi nereikia dėti
Kovoschiz (2024-03-14 01:50:21+00:00): 醫院管理局大樓不是醫院，不應有 `=hospital`
shu0410 (2024-03-14 01:58:06+00:00): 不好意思，我是根据警告里面直接改的，如果有错误请原谅💦
Falcor (2025-08-04 09:24:28+00:00): couldn't find it, it's non-existent or the pin is in the wrong spot. No parking for a vehicle
Tomas_J (2025-08-04 13:51:50+00:00): Ahoj.  Pokud tam není, prosím , smaž nebo označ fixme. Parkoviště tam není - je to backcountry impromptu.
Mannivu (2025-07-07 14:15:50+00:00): Ciao, l'eliminazione alle info della relazione https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10383169 è perché non esiste più?
NeisBot (2024-03-24 12:40:43+00:00): Hello vivek meena, thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.Please see https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments \n
Thanks!

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
MxxCon (2024-03-17 04:58:01+00:00): Hello.
If you were cleaning up ads from the description tag, why did you delete all the biz-specific tags?
And even more so, why did you delete all the address tags from this building?!
This is borderline map vandalism! The deleted information MUST be restored!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148603659
NeisBot (2024-03-24 12:40:42+00:00): Hello yash kumar saha, thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.Please see https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments \n
Thanks!

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
Map-Peter (2024-03-13 23:11:42+00:00): Hallo MagSungam,
 
das ist noch lange kein Grund diverse Dinge aus OSM zu löschen - höre sofort auf damit!  
https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=148604113  
Das ist Vandalismus.  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Vandalismus
MagSungam (2024-03-14 10:40:03+00:00): Nein amenity=toilets  mit access=privat soll es nicht mehr geben.
Siehe hier:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dtoilets

Bei amenity=showe geht es im WiKi auch mit diesen Worten los "Public showers".    Es sollen ebenfalls nur Einrichtungen getagged werden die dauerhaft zugänglich sind. Gerde hier in der Gegend mit viel Tourismus ist es blöd wenn die Leute auf grund von falschen Ideen einen Umweg machen und hier etwas zum Duschen oder die Toilette suchen, die nicht in betrieb nicht da oder privat ist.

Ich dachte Best Practices wäre auch dies:
- Verwenden Sie nur Informationen, die öffentlich zugänglich sind
- Respektieren Sie die Wünsche der Eigentümer, insbesondere wenn diese Bedenken hinsichtlich der Sicherheit ihrer Anlagen äußern.

Es gab auch schon vor Jahren Diskussionen im OSM Forum um das Mappen von Temporären Einrichtungen, mit Bezug zum Kulturkosmos und dem AirPark, daraufhin wurde durch mich und andere schon mal alles FEstival bezogenes entfernt das nicht auf dem Kulturkosmosgelände ist. Ich habe sein dem nichts mehr eingetragen was nur Temporär vorhanden ist und wünsche mir das mindestens auf dem Kulturkosmos Gelände auch von den anderen Menschen.
MagSungam (2024-03-14 10:51:05+00:00): Ganz oben wollte ich schreiben: Nein, das ist kein Vandalismus sondern Aufräumen, denn ...

ps: Offtopic schön wäre wenn nach dem absenden Korrekturen möglich wären, durch die vielen Foren wo das mittlerweile normal ist wird schnell vergessen das das nicht überall so ist.
Map-Peter (2024-03-14 19:58:57+00:00): Nun "mal Butter bei die Fische" ...  
Inwieweit genau bist du im Kulturkosmos Müritz e.V. involviert?
MagSungam (2024-03-15 13:06:58+00:00): Viel tiefer geht es nicht.
Map-Peter (2024-03-15 15:39:00+00:00): Du sprichst hier also im Namen des _gesamten_ Kulturkosmos Müritz e.V./wurdest dazu bevollmächtigt?
 
Kannst du das irgendwie belegen? Denn hier steht ja eine recht umfangreiche Lösch-/Änderungs-Forderung an OSM im Raum.
 
Was _genau_ erwartet dieser Verein, als Eigentümer dieses Privatgeländes, von OSM?
 
Will dieser Verein gar keine öffentlich zugängliche Karte oder geht es nur um Details wie z.B. die Löschung von Toiletten/Duschen?
 
Ich frage so genau nach, weil hier jahrelange Arbeit mehrerer Mapper anscheinend einfach ersatzlos gelöscht werden soll. (Zumindest ist das mein Eindruck bisher.)