piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Gregory Peony (2024-10-29 04:32:00+00:00): All of these footprints outline buildings, but they could be more accurate. The features I flagged envelope several buildings. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157079035
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-09-25 22:20:41+00:00): reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157103756
woodpeck_repair (2024-09-25 19:37:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 157099118 where the changeset comment is: revert railway crossing edits make in circumvention of block, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16712
woodpeck_repair (2024-12-02 23:53:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 159862440, 159862427, 159862512, 159862481, 159862457, 159862433 where the changeset comment is: revert roblox_gmx edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16954
dmfr (2024-12-12 13:13:25+00:00): Olá Pedro! Podes clarificar porque é que eliminaste a way 1211374953?
Obrigado.
dieterdreist (2025-01-12 23:03:26+00:00): Hi, it seems you have changed some zebra crossings to traffic signal crossings here, but they are actually zebra crossings, for example in Via del Foro Olitorio
woodpeck_repair (2024-09-25 19:37:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 157099118 where the changeset comment is: revert railway crossing edits make in circumvention of block, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16712
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-03 19:34:47+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12198939560/history has shop = baozi that was added in this edit
shop=baozi ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop or https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Tag_descriptions_for_key_%22shop%22 fitting? Maybe new value needs to be invented? Maybe this data is wrong and there is no shop here? Maybe it is not a shop but something else?
AntEntro (2026-02-08 15:21:11+00:00): Thank you for your notice to this detail."baozi" is a kind of Chinese-style breakfast, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baozi . I find no such tag fitting.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-10 08:46:14+00:00): are they selling ready to eat food, or food that you still need to prepare at home to eat it?

in the first case: amenity=fast_food (or amenity=restaurant) with cuisine=baozi would work

in the second maybe shop=food food=prepared_meals cuisine=baozi ?
Or shop=food food=prepared_meals prepared_meals=baozi ?
(I tagged very similar ones with very similar type of food - called "pierogi" in my local area)
AntEntro (2026-02-10 15:23:56+00:00): I would take the first case, thank you for your advice.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-09-25 12:30:58+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1318101042

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
rskedgell (2024-09-27 06:39:25+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157156102
waldhans (2024-09-25 16:21:40+00:00): wieso hast du beim Haus Mittelstraße 23 die Quelle (source) gelöscht? 
Gebäude habem in Kreis Viersen immer einen source-Tag!!!
SomeoneElse (2024-09-25 12:36:13+00:00): There may be more signage (worth going back to have a look) beyond "no access to allotments".  Also several different surfaces here, so splitting would make sense.
eggie (2024-09-25 13:17:44+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  
Alle begin is moeilijk. 
Dit is wat je hebt gedaan.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=157080529
Je hebt adres Hermelijnvlinder 309 verwijderd. 
Bestaat dat adres niet meer?
Je hebt oneway=yes verwijderd terwijl de conditionalbeperkingen er nog allemaal opstaan.
Wat is daar dan veranderd?

Je hebt de busbaan opengezet voor bromfietsen? Dat lijkt me onwaarschijnlijk.  Dus niet de Oude Landweg. 
De Oude Landweg De tagging op de Oude Landweg was al in orde.
Ik zet je edits even terug middels een revert .
De tijdelijke beperking op de Oude Kanaaldijk die op datum stond zal ik even doorsturen naar de voorgaande mapper. 


MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-09-25 13:21:40+00:00): reverted by changeset #157082757
Daarmee schade hersteld...  moped=yes op busway/motorway weer verwijderd.
Inconsistente accesstagging Kanaaldijk teruggedraaid. 
Mocht je vragen hebben stel ze gerust. 

MVG
eggie
zbrown4 (2024-09-26 19:30:12+00:00): Hi - based on the road design here, I believe this segment should not be one-way, which is why I removed your initial tag. Traffic can use this segment of road to travel southbound to Schmidt Lake Road.
Fizzie-DWG (2024-09-25 23:46:00+00:00): Hi. Why did you remove the residential area: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/10359496? Thanks
woodpeck (2024-09-26 11:29:04+00:00): Kannst Du bitte auch die korrekte Quelle angeben, "knowledge" ist für eine Geometrie-Änderung wie https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/174942653 oder https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/178035075 ja wohl eher nicht angebracht.
InsertUser (2024-09-25 14:03:02+00:00): On what basis?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157081313
ElblagCanal (2024-09-26 11:44:30+00:00): Hello InsertUser, the classification change was intended to reflect vehicle access specifically to Jaws Beach. I noticed that there is Strava activity that reflects pedestrian travel to and from the track road (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12198982230). I can restore the road connection there, but if you have any other concerns, feel free to let me know.
gurglypipe (2024-09-25 15:45:51+00:00): Nice work!
NorthCrab_upload (2024-09-25 13:10:48+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12199001584
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1318101042

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Przemek | Yanosik (2024-10-21 13:19:20+00:00): Witam serdecznie, skąd wzięła się informacja o nazwie ulic? Administracyjnie nie są nadane żadne nazwy ulic.
Kovoschiz (2024-09-25 16:51:11+00:00): `name=` should be for proper names only, similar to what might be used after opening. Don't direct copy descriptor labels coined by others, or the entire project heading.
Kovoschiz (2024-09-25 16:51:50+00:00): 1. `description:zh=` has already been used here
owennson (2024-09-26 13:22:50+00:00): That's ridiculous. Street names and road names are not proper names either, if expansion plan names are not proper names, then neither do street names and road names.
Kovoschiz (2024-09-26 16:19:14+00:00): Can you please check the dictionary for the meaning of proper names?
Also you are still wrong. There's no PWP title as "Tsing Yi Road West Public Housing". Site formation is Public Housing Development at Tsing Yi Road West, which is exactly what should be avoided. It's undesirable to have real estate agent style names either, which everyone can call them differently. 
 In fact, the road names can form the project titles and site names https://www.pland.gov.hk/pland_en/resources/approved_pb/hd_pb/index.html
https://www.pland.gov.hk/file/resources/approved_pb/hd_pb/pdf/Ching_Hong_Road_North_Tsing_Yi.pdf
https://www.pland.gov.hk/file/resources/approved_pb/hd_pb/pdf/Ching_Hong_Road_North_Tsing_Yi.pdf
Kovoschiz (2024-09-26 16:20:45+00:00): https://www.housingauthority.gov.hk/en/business-partnerships/resources/information-platform-non-insert-recyclable/location-plan-of-active-sites/index.html
Besides items labeled with street names, those "Public Housing Development" labels still have a proper name eg https://www.pland.gov.hk/file/resources/approved_pb/hd_pb/pdf/Long_Bin_Phases_1_and_2_Yuen_Long.pdf
Kovoschiz (2024-09-26 16:26:14+00:00): No offense to others who did their part, but for example it would be more ridiculous to have `name=重置駿業街遊樂場設施至康寧道公園及牛頭角配水庫 Reprovisioning of Tsun Yip Street Playground facilities to Hong Ning Road Park and Ngau Tau Kok Fresh Water Service Reservoir` https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/121158738
Kovoschiz (2024-09-26 16:28:43+00:00): https://www.districtcouncils.gov.hk/kwt/doc/2020_2023/en/dc_meetings_doc/21704/21_D_2022.pdf
"下稱「 青衣西路用地 」）" clear evidence the site can simply be called Tsing Yi Rd W
owennson (2024-09-26 17:36:22+00:00): If there are finalised names, of course I'll use them, like Hiu Yan Estate in Sau Mau Ping. However, construction site usually don't have such names, and using road names have problems. A road can be really long, who knows which one? Also, as a map reader, I will wonder what was building at the moment. I think adding public housing into construction sites is totally acceptable. I saw "世運道" and just feels odd, what was "世運道" building? Where exactly is it?
Kovoschiz (2024-09-26 19:24:35+00:00): That's what `description=` is for. Adding such such info to `name=` based on rendering concerns violates 2 good practice.
Kovoschiz (2024-09-26 19:31:57+00:00): You are simply setting up a slippery slope for others to change into arbitary titles. This has already happened before with Kai Tak site numbers, and land lot numbers.
Kovoschiz (2024-09-26 19:34:15+00:00): It has been dubbed "the Olympic Avenue site". Clearly the site is called Olympic Ave. I will only align with other sites here.
Kovoschiz (2024-09-26 19:34:49+00:00): https://www.legco.gov.hk/yr2023/english/fc/pwsc/papers/pwsc20230208pwsc-12-1-e.pdf
Kovoschiz (2024-09-26 20:49:59+00:00): As shown by the Olympic Ave example, PWP item titles don't work either. 2HL covers the entire batch. Now you have to use the contract name, or basically anything people want. This is fine when creating a printed map on paper yourself for labeling. But OSM is a digital map database. It doesn't need "(WIP 2024)" etc. It needs some standards that can be followed.
owennson (2024-09-27 13:59:03+00:00): Description cannot be shown on the map, so that's pointless. If so, I just simply add "site" at the end.
Kovoschiz (2024-09-27 16:54:06+00:00): 1. Please re-read guidelines
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions
2. This is a raster basemap style, not a map app. An actual app would have clickable icons to show each feature.
GSF1200S (2024-10-07 09:46:00+00:00): That OSM police thinks he is god and everyone must follow his instructions LOL
Kovoschiz (2024-10-08 06:29:25+00:00): Still waiting for your reply if you have the leisure of stalking and harasssing others with irrelevant comments to a changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144534922
PierreDuMatin (2024-10-05 13:09:13+00:00): Bonjour,
La nouvelle adresse du point que vous avez modifié est située à 1 km de sa position actuelle. Êtes-vous sûr·e que cette nouvelle adresse est correcte ?

Si c'est bien le cas, il faudrait créer un nouveau POI à la nouvelle adresse et signaler celui-ci comme vacant.
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2024-10-07 07:04:01+00:00): Bonjour,

Effectivement, il y'a eu un souci de diffusion. Nous avons donc supprimé le point

Cordialement,
L'Equipe DB
bxl-forever (2024-09-25 13:39:21+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/240038021/history is a building. You should NOT retag it into a landuse area. Please use correct tags for schools, do not remove buildings from the map.
5m4u9 (2024-09-26 03:16:33+00:00): Hola, bienvenid@!

Vi que hiciste algunos cambios en el barrio y añadiste una «frontera del barrio», no está del todo bien añadir barreras, existe un tipo de elemento en el mapa para límites administrativos (barrios).

Como dice que está en disputa, en el mapa no podemos parcializarnos. Quité la frontera que pusiste y añadí el nombre del barrio que se visibilice en el centro del area que dibujaste.

Hay que revisar la info oficial en el concejo muncipal para dibujar las dos OTBs. hasta mientras el nombre del barrio creo sirve.

Añadí infraestructura pública como el area deportiva, la zona de juegos. Si pudieras añadir los nombres de las calles o los sentidos de circulación sería genial.
elot360 (2024-11-22 00:33:44+00:00): Czemu zmieniłeś na ulicach Czajkowskiego i Ustronie highway na construction? Na obu ulicach nie ma prowadzonych żadnych prac, są one tylko "nieprzejezdne" na czas przebudowy wiaduktu drogowego
Tomek | Yanosik (2024-11-22 07:08:02+00:00): Ok, poprawiłem na motor_vehicle=no
literan (2024-09-25 20:14:37+00:00): что за выдумки
309_308_307 (2025-04-04 15:31:06+00:00): Hallo,

weißt du zufällig noch, wegen welcher Note du diese Bearbeitung vorgenommen hast?

Hintergrund: durch diese Bearbeitung ist die Südhessen-Route 8 kaputtgegangen, weil der Abschnitt am Bahnhof Seligenstadt gelöscht würde. Ich hätte den Abschnitt jetzt wiederhergestellt, aber anscheinend gibt es einen Grund, wieso das so und nicht anders gemappt wurde...
Geo-Tobi (2025-04-04 17:51:56+00:00): Grüß dich. Das war diese Note: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3146918  Das deckt sich auch mit den Änderungen, denn ich sehe, dass cycleway track entfernt wurde und gänzlich auf lane geändert wurde. Was sich mir aber nun nicht ganz erschließt, ist wie dadurch eine Radwege Relation kaputt geht. Ich hoffe, ich bin nicht über das Ziel hinaus geschossen. Der INhalt der Änderung allerdings erscheint mir prinzipiell ok und angemessen. Ich denke, das lässt sich wieder hinbiegen. Ohne Ortskenntnis kann ich da allerdings nicht agieren. Hoffe, das hilft. Grüße
juminet (2024-10-11 06:47:22+00:00): Hello Robin on wheels,

Are you sure the official name of this school is in NL? Please correct if you can. 

Happy mapping, 

juminet
YomanNH (2024-09-26 06:28:02+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/837599756 - tu jest przejście dla pieszych wraz z przejazdem dla rowerów. To jest highway=path, tak jak było wcześniej. Przywróciłem prawidłowe tagowanie.
eggie (2024-09-25 15:05:02+00:00): Hoi Het zal nu wel een eind routeren voor fietsers behalve dan dat stuk footway. motor_vehicle=no hoef je niet te taggen op een voetpad. Dat is default.
Dit heb je aangepast nu https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=157085624
Die verwijderde  gebouwen zou je kunnen laten importeren via het forum. 
Mapse
eggie
InsertUser (2024-09-26 00:59:22+00:00): What is the basis for this change?
ElblagCanal (2024-09-27 23:53:10+00:00): Hello InsertUser, Looking at Esri World Imagery, it appeared that the road represented through the construction feature (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/692398064) is drivable. After investigating further, it appears Maxar SecureWatch Imagery from 2024-05-22 shows vehicles driving and parking at Western Atlantic School of Medicine. Public imagery is generally used to cite things that can be seen, though in retrospect, the latter could have been cited to reflect regular driving activity. In addition, there are service roads (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1188377837) isolated from the rest of the road network, and thus changing the classification was intended to be a positive edit. If you have any concerns about these modifications, you are welcome to reach out.
Gregory Peony (2024-10-24 22:06:03+00:00): Although I have verified this changeset as bad, there is a lot that I like about it too. For instance you've squared the majority of rectilinear buildings that you've added in this changeset. In places you followed good practice and modified features rather than deleting the old ones and adding new ones in their stead, (and in some cases improved existing mapping). I also like that you decided (seemingly part way through) to use an alternate imagery source in this area, because it had a greater resolution.

If you want to improve the first points I'll give you is to draw building footprints slightly smaller, ~95% the size the roof you see in the imagery. Hold the Alt key when adding nodes close to existing features to prevent your cursor from snapping to them.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157085950
Gregory Peony (2024-10-24 22:06:22+00:00): Although I have verified this changeset as bad, there is a lot that I like about it too. For instance you've squared the majority of rectilinear buildings that you've added in this changeset. In places you followed good practice and modified features rather than deleting the old ones and adding new ones in their stead, (and in some cases improved existing mapping). I also like that you decided (seemingly part way through) to use an alternate imagery source in this area, because it had a greater resolution.

If you want to improve the first points I'll give you is to draw building footprints slightly smaller, ~95% the size the roof you see in the imagery. Hold the Alt key when adding nodes close to existing features to prevent your cursor from snapping to them.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157085950
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-08 03:33:14+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164658873
bxl-forever (2024-09-25 20:06:58+00:00): If you want to add schools or amenities, please create separate nodes for them.  Do not change existing address points.  Also, please observe that in Belgium we do not add postcodes or city names on addresses, we don’t need that because the database already contains all the postcodes areas.
juminet (2024-10-02 19:15:07+00:00): Hello, 

You changed the type of the building from building=public to building=openbaar_gebouw. This value "openbaar_gebouw" is not used anywhere else in OpenStreetMap and is not documented in the OpenStreetMap wiki. I cannot see one reason why the value building=public was wrong on this building. 

Can you make the correction? 

Thanks in advance and happy mapping in OSM!

juminet
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-10-25 22:07:27+00:00): Please don't used untested editors
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157087008
gscholz (2024-12-04 09:01:02+00:00): Hi Martin218110,
your recent changesets have left behind a lot of errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=2.39886&lat=47.20510&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas

As you may know, this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps. 
Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
eggie (2024-09-25 15:39:46+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Tip  Maak je duikers vast aan het open water. Je trekt ook duikers door het open water. dat lijkt me niet correct. Kijk je nog even.


Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=157087094
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-09-25 17:33:23+00:00): De meeste cilverts heb ik weer omgezet naar waterway=ditch
Waar wel duikers zijn heb ik ze vastgemaakt aan het open water.
Check het nog even, want je had overal duikers gemaakt waar die gewoon niet zijn.
MVG
eggie
Kevin_93 (2024-09-25 18:23:17+00:00): ahh, kijk, daar had ik een fout gemaakt ik dacht dat alleen het deel dat onder een ander object door ging een culvert werd. Nu ziet het er goed uit.
Dank!
eggie (2024-09-25 18:28:27+00:00): Yep.. er gaat niets automatisch. 😀 Dus steeds splitsen in aparte delen. 
Veel plezier met mappen.
eggie
djsa (2025-12-10 10:00:48+00:00): Hi sbaido,

Thanks for contributing to the challenge. Did you check any of the provided information before adding this school to the map? There is no school at this location, only a related office. The contact info you added (name, email and website) is for the general organization, not the school located in this area.

I'm removing the node, as this is incorrect.
5m4u9 (2024-09-26 03:19:03+00:00): Oficialmente lleva ese nombre pero si usan ese nombre muy sesgado a la historia israelita, lo cambiaré a nombre local.
5m4u9 (2024-09-26 04:08:12+00:00): Hola, no entiendo bien la descripción... dices que cambias porque el barrio dijo que se llama así y no como se llama oficialmente? 🤔
syntex (2024-09-25 18:50:59+00:00): Nie twórz proszę relacji jednoelementowych, takich jak np ta: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18088749
Yukiro (2024-09-26 06:13:22+00:00): Sorry, zapomniałem usunąć jak rozdzielałem.
5m4u9 (2024-09-26 04:11:29+00:00): Hola, ese nombre usan los vecinos? porque el oficial es el que borraste... a mi me parece que John Hus es solo un nombre antiguo o quizá un nombre local.
5m4u9 (2024-09-26 04:13:00+00:00): creo que hay error en colocar de un solo sentido... por qué otra calle salen?
maro21 (2024-09-29 18:35:17+00:00): Przy edytowaniu najlepiej wyłączyć warstwy Granice i Obiekty dystrybucji prądu, żeby uniknąć łączenia ich z innymi obiektami.
wielandb (2024-09-27 07:48:17+00:00): Hey :)
Since theese objects are still visible on most arial images, they should not be deleted but rather marked as razed until new images are available. I took the liberty of doing that. :)
rohieb (2025-03-24 19:08:37+00:00): I've removed them now since I've mapped a landuse=brownfield over it after the land was flattened completely.  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164047284
5m4u9 (2024-09-26 04:25:36+00:00): hol, no justifica el caudal del flujo de agua para elevarlo a río, va entre torrentera a arroyo.
mga_geo (2024-09-27 11:52:35+00:00): Bonjour,
Vous avez dupliqué le giratoire du Racker dans la relation r7091938 en position 176 et 177.
Pouvez-vous corriger ?
Marc
Roue-doudou (2024-09-27 12:45:11+00:00): My bad, c'est corrigé
ivanbranco (2024-09-25 17:32:27+00:00): Ciao, la wiki di tunnel=building_passage dice "The layer should be the same as the layer of the building, with the exception when several tunnels are passing on different levels. So if the building doesn't have a layer tag, the way should not have one either."

Perché layer=1 ai weighbridge?
Es. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1090561090/history
adamos (2024-09-27 21:12:49+00:00): Poznámka k nově vytvořené lince 72: Relace MHD spoje se tvoří tak, že na prvních místech jsou zastávky, případně nástupi0ště, pak teprve jednotlivé segmenty. Segmenty musí navazovat bez přerušení. Případně je možné zkontrolovat chyby na https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes
Pavel_Š (2024-09-28 03:54:07+00:00): Děkuji za upozornění, opravuji.
woodpeck_repair (2024-10-01 09:34:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 157330094 where the changeset comment is: revert von Löschungen bis zu einer Einigung in https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/loschen-von-elementen-ehem-bergwerks-stollen-unter-verweis-auf-gefahrlichkeit
PizzaTreeIsland (2024-09-25 21:17:07+00:00): Hello, 
thank you for the contribution! I just changed all tags with dogs=* to dog=*, as that is the right tag to use (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:dog). Please keep that in mind for future edits. 

Happy mapping!
Jonas