piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mboeringa (2024-02-06 06:55:03+00:00): The only other viable alternative would be to re-tag it clearly as "eco-region", e.g. by removing the "natural=desert" tag, and replacing it by a new, yet to be documented tag, of something like "natural=eco_region" / "eco_region=desert" (and where something like the Amazone Forest could be tagged like "natural=eco_region" / "eco_region=tropical_rainforest").

But I think for now is best to delete this node.
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2024-02-10 05:55:10+00:00): I agree with the deletion solution, regards
mboeringa (2024-02-12 17:14:56+00:00): Done, also after contacting the original author of the node to ask for the reasons and source of the addition of this node, see this changeset discussion: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141871724
woodpeck_repair (2024-06-15 22:29:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 152740214, 152740288, 152740274, 152740234, 152740192, 152740169, 152740167, 152740249, 152740178 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions by Hamilton 44/Delta Evas ALL, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16207
Autopistero20502020 (2023-12-31 19:58:20+00:00): Tal como había dado la razón de la anterior discusión, le pido las disculpas. Recuperada la referencia de alt_name, cambio de distancia y la red.
Autopistero20502020 (2023-12-31 19:58:43+00:00): Olvidé añadir la nota sobre los tramos que están pendientes de proyecto o actualización de proyecto.
somehundred (2023-12-31 20:22:58+00:00): Es tur biju aizgājis, tur viss ceļš šobrīd ziemā izskatās apmēram kā šajā attēlā: https://images.app.goo.gl/1w3ENfWX7W4LEuA6A. Žēl, ka neuzbildēju.
HellMap (2023-12-31 20:32:27+00:00): Jā, bet šis ir sezonāli. Ar `surface=mud` apzīmē ceļus, kas ir šādā stāvoklī visu gadu, vai vismaz lielāko daļu gada. Pašlaik tā izskatās puse izbraukāto meža ceļu pie ziemas atkušņiem/sasalumiem. To nevar izmantot "galvenā" seguma noteikšanā. Vasarā šis gabals ir "normāls": https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1306604086742357&focus=photo

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface%3Dmud
Autopistero20502020 (2023-12-31 20:06:24+00:00): Se ha modificado la red (quitado el AND-higway y dejar solo "Red Básica Estructurante)
Autopistero20502020 (2023-12-31 20:07:11+00:00): Se ha modificado la red (quitado el AND-higway y dejar solo "Red Básica Estructurante)
arjunaraoc (2024-01-01 09:09:54+00:00): Hello Evila,

Can you explain in simple English the explanation for the changes that you are uploading instead of cryptic numerical code to facilitate review by others
Autopistero20502020 (2023-12-31 20:08:06+00:00): Se ha modificado la red (quitado el AND-higway y dejar solo "Red Básica Estructurante)
silversurfer83 (2024-01-01 09:49:20+00:00): revert in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145755875
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145745619
silversurfer83 (2024-01-01 09:50:59+00:00): Lieber kart057,

mir reicht es. Du wurdest mehrfach sachlich und mit Hilfsangeboten angesprochen. In Kommentaren sowie privat. Leider machst du weiter wie bisher. Das geht nicht. Such dir bitte ein anderes Hobby.

Frohes Neues
silversurfer83
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145745619
Fizzie-DWG (2024-01-03 00:06:02+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15546
Autopistero20502020 (2023-12-31 20:11:05+00:00): Se ha modificado el punto de los decimales en la distancia, quitado el AND-highway de la red (dejado solo "Red Básica Estructurante") y quitado el codigo de la A-92N a petición de Pipeton.
Marek-M (2024-01-01 12:54:45+00:00): Cześć, track oznacza drogę leśną lub dojazdy do pól/lasów. Tutaj ewidentnie przynajmniej od Modrzewiowej jest to droga dojazdowa do minimum 3 nieruchomości. Droga powinna mieć kategorię minimum drogi dojazdowej: 
highway=service
service=driveway

Jeżeli droga jest trudno przejezdna dla samochodów, to można dodać do niej dodatkowe tagi takie jak:
smoothness=bad
surface=ground

a nawet można dodać np:
tracktype=grade3

I takie tagi większość nawigacji bierze pod uwagę przy nawigacji. Nie jest to droga przelotowa, więc nie ma ryzyka, że ktoś jadący do sąsiedniej miejscowości w niej ugrzęźnie.

Jeżeli droga jest jedynym dojazdem do jakiejkolwiek nieruchomości, to nie może mieć kategorii track, nawet gdy jest bardzo złej jakości.

Pozdrawiam i życzę szczęśliwego Nowego Roku.
adas172002 (2024-01-01 17:37:51+00:00): Hej,

dziękuję za sugestie, poprawiłem moją korektę https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145769695 dzieląc drogą na dwa odcinki. De facto (czego sam doświadczyłem) odcinek nieprzejezdny dla aut osobowych nie jest drogą utwardzoną ale wyjeżdżonym przez auta kawałkiem pola, które jesienią robi się grząską pułapką. Dlatego moim zdaniem część powinna być zaklasyfikowana jako *track*.
olo81 (2024-01-04 07:29:08+00:00): Mapowanie historyczne, usunięte. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_praktyki
Mikezzu (2024-01-02 18:51:26+00:00): Miksi olet poistanut uran? Luvat on.
Röörikki (2024-01-02 20:36:27+00:00): Tässäkin teillä on nyt mahdollisuus tehdän asiat paremmin kuin ennen, ihan niinkuin uhositte! Laita dokumentit luvista, tai sovi uudet ennen uran palauttamista!
Mikezzu (2024-01-02 18:19:50+00:00): Miksi olet poistanut urat? Luvat on.
Röörikki (2024-01-02 18:29:14+00:00): Onko teillä esittää luvat?
Mikezzu (2024-01-02 19:01:25+00:00): Luvat on maanomistajan ja kerhon väliset.
Röörikki (2024-01-02 20:44:22+00:00): Oikein ihana on tämä teidän haavekuva, tehkää itse omat lupanne ja luvittakaa nämä alueet ennen kuin kehoitatte jäsenenne rikkomaan maastoliikenne lakia! Teillä oli mahdollisuus asia toteuttaa toisin, monta kertaa sitä teille tarjottiin. Minulla on erilaiset luvat täällä, esitä kerhon lupa!!? Maanomistajat ovat eri mieltä! Minä en enää kommentoi näihin typeriin kyselyihin enempää, soita tai tule käymään mikäli asiaa!? 🤬
gscholz (2024-01-05 09:22:57+00:00): Hi Manuele R,
please keep roundabouts intact and do not add overlapping ways:

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=145746496

This irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps.

Kind regards
Guido
supersellout6907 (2023-12-31 21:12:41+00:00): excuse me for the large change box
جمال المطيري (2024-01-01 16:15:44+00:00): ام سلم
lelos12 (2024-01-11 16:42:17+00:00): As of my last knowledge update in January 2022, the Cherokee name for the USA was ᎠᎹᏰᏟ, pronounced as "Ahmaquu-di." However, it's important to note that language and cultural aspects can change, and I do not have real-time information.

If there has been a change to the Cherokee name for the USA to "ᏌᏊ ᎢᏳᎾᎵᏍᏔᏅ ᏍᎦᏚᎩ," I would not be aware of it. It's recommended to consult with authoritative sources, such as Cherokee language experts or cultural organizations, for the most up-to-date and accurate information.

Please note that I cannot access external websites, including the one you provided (https://quickdatecheck.com/), as my browsing capability is disabled. If you have any specific questions or if there's anything else I can help you with, feel free to ask!
supersellout6907 (2024-01-15 20:35:40+00:00): Well the map i got this from was from a Cherokee map of the united states, published on the Cherokee Nation's official website
gscholz (2024-01-05 09:25:36+00:00): Hi Manuele R,
please keep roundabouts intact and do not add overlapping ways:

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=145746742

This irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps.

Kind regards
Guido
MxxCon (2024-01-02 02:08:59+00:00): It's best not to use just naked url= tag as documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:url
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145746914
IraGersh (2024-01-02 02:36:07+00:00): Will look. Someone said use that or source. Unfortunately URL stuck in my head . And then I used mapcomplete. Thanks for catching that.
IraGersh (2024-01-02 02:40:58+00:00): I wanted something to show I wasn't making it up. Would source:url be ok? For that pollinator place area I put the URL in a note because website was inappropriate.
Marek-M (2024-01-01 14:01:17+00:00): Cześć,
Dlaczego tutaj https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/312659777 zmieniłeś drogę dojazdową na track? Jest to jedyny dojazd do nieruchomości i track nie jest odpowiednim do tego tagowaniem. Przed Twoja edycją była ona poprawnie zmapowana.
Marek-M (2024-01-01 14:03:50+00:00): Tak samo potraktowałeś tą drogę https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/312659778 - jest to nieprawidłowa edycja. Czy mógłbyś zweryfikować jakie dojazdy jeszcze tak zmieniłeś i poprawić je do prawidłowego tagowania, czyli:
highway=service
service=driveway

Jeżeli jakość drogi Ci nie pasuje, to są od tego inne tagi takie jak smoothness, surface a nawet tracktype.

Pozdro.
Mikezzu (2024-01-02 12:38:18+00:00): Miksi poistit uran? Kerholla on luvat.
Röörikki (2024-01-02 16:12:35+00:00): Olen informoinut kerhoa aiheesta sähköpostitse 24.12.2023. Ja juuri myös varmistanut asian maanomistajalta kyseiseltä alueelta, ja hänen kertomansa mukaan kerho ei ole kysynyt lupaa! Todella vastuutonta kehoittaa kelkailijoita rikkomaan maastoliikenne lakia alueella (facebook päivitys kerhon virallisella ilmoitus kanavalla)!
Mikezzu (2024-01-02 17:34:42+00:00): Urat on aikanaan luvitettu kerholle ja muutokset urastoon tekee kerhon hallitus.
Kukaan maanomistaja ei ole ollut yhteydessä kerhon hallituksen jäseniin. Näin ollen sopimukset ovat voimassa.
Voisitko palauttaa urat palveluun?
Röörikki (2024-01-02 18:28:22+00:00): Kelkkakerholle aikanaan (2004-kerhon perustamisenjälkeen) luvitetut urat ovat edelleen siellä ajettavissa. Ja näiltä osin kerhon hallituksen muokattavissa.
Itse ennen kerhoa luvittamani urat olen irtisanonut, kuten jo aiemmin ilmoitin, joten näiltä osin ei edes minulla ole ko. alueille maankäyttölupaa, enkä täten voi uria palauttaa ilman sopimuksia.
Valitettvasti teillä kerhona ei ole tällähetkellä voimassa olevia maankäyttö sopimuksia maanomistajien kanssa nyt poistettujen urien osalta.
Nämä nyt irtisanotut maankäyttösopimukset olivat minun henkilökohtaisesti tekemiä ja niissä sopimuksissa ei missään mainita Hankasalmen Moottorikelkkailijat Häkäracing ry.
Toki tekemällä uudet sopimukset maanomistajien kanssa voitte viivat takaisin piirtää, mutta ilman sopimuksia niitä ei sinne kannata piirrellä.
MxxCon (2024-01-02 02:09:54+00:00): Hello.
How come you tagged all these intersections as uncontrolled when they are clearly have traffic lights?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145747342
dentonny (2024-01-01 17:34:59+00:00): Dag JanFi,

ivm het bescherm gebied Mosselgoren: dit hebt u nu toch veel te klein gemaakt volgens mij

mvg

het moet lukken dat ik er vandaag ben gaan wandelen
JanFi (2024-01-01 20:00:01+00:00): Euh, ik heb het gebied iets groter gemaakt: de drie vijvers die er middenin liggen horen nu bij het natuurgebied.
rskedgell (2024-01-04 12:49:42+00:00): The islands may have been removed (I updated the crossing node with StreetComplete in December 2021), but why did you also delete the turn restriction relations at this junction?

Restrictions restored in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145879492

#DWG
rskedgell (2024-01-01 12:04:36+00:00): Reverted.
RedEyedVireo (2024-01-03 15:58:15+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM!

What is the source for these changes? 

I believe that there is a state law prohibiting speed limits being set over 65mph unless they have changed the law? 

Thanks
RedEyedVerio
RedEyedVireo (2024-01-06 23:18:46+00:00): Hello again,

It has been several days since I first contacted you about the sources for your edits since I found them to be highly unlicky to be correct

Since then I have done an internet search for changes of speed limit on I290 and MA 2. Both searches came up empty. I also checked the speed limit on I290 while I was commuting on it. The limit is still 65mph. 

At this point I can state with certenty that this changeset and your others on I290 are fictional. Keeping this in mind it is highly likely that your speed limit changes on MA 2 are also fictional.

Editing of this type is defined in the OSM wiki as vandalism https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Vandalism#Vandalism_and_other_types_of_bad_editing

This page also give me the privlage to revert edits that I can prove degrade the quality of the map data on OSM. 

Therefore I am asking that you please revert the speedlimit changes back to the previous values.

If I do not get a response from you by 6PM on Sunday the 7th (tomorrow) I will revert your edits myself.

If you have any questions please do not hesitate to ask.

RedEyedVireo
RedEyedVireo (2024-01-08 13:28:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by changeset 146012929.
RedEyedVireo (2024-01-08 03:30:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by changeset 146012948.
mcliquid (2024-01-01 09:33:03+00:00): Hi,

just a general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
RedEyedVireo (2024-01-08 13:28:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by changeset 146013425.
RedEyedVireo (2024-01-08 03:29:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by changeset 146013032.
RedEyedVireo (2024-01-08 03:28:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by changeset 146013043.
RedEyedVireo (2024-01-08 03:27:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by changeset 146013050.
RedEyedVireo (2024-01-08 03:27:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by changeset 146013058.
RedEyedVireo (2024-01-08 03:26:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by changeset 146013067
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2024-01-11 15:47:21+00:00): It seems that you accidentally deleted one of the lines related to "الربع الخالي":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12037787
And I fixed it here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146148999
NorthCrab_upload (2023-12-31 22:40:51+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Kameralna":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11474494122
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11474494126
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11474494128
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11474494129

"Malinowa":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11474494124
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11474494125
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11474494130
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11474494131

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Kovoschiz (2024-01-01 07:55:23+00:00): Can you please stop creating fake `historic=` features? Other wrong examples don't justify more wrongs.
CurlingMan13 (2024-01-01 23:54:06+00:00): Welcome to OSM!  Looks good, but in the future, expand out the names of street so there are no abbreviations.

Ex:  "W. Carmen St."  should be added as "West Carmen Street"

I have fixed it for you in this case.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145748340
MxxCon (2024-01-02 02:22:11+00:00): Hello.
Please don't map sidewalks a single loop around the whole block. Each street should have sidewalk as its own way.
Also, please position curbs cuts exactly where they are, not just randomly at the corner of 2 sidewalks.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145748974
bxl-forever (2024-01-01 03:32:36+00:00): Hello,
It looks like you managed to upload this changeset on midnight (GMT), making it the very first change in 2024 in the database.  Congrats!
charl3s (2024-01-01 11:23:32+00:00): Thanks
wireguy (2024-01-17 17:22:32+00:00): Stretch, fyi changeset broke relation 16911638 fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146373951
Stretch Longfellow (2024-01-17 17:58:05+00:00): Thanks!
tastrax (2024-01-01 05:04:10+00:00): I think this is incorrect - first its a shed so likely doesn't have an address, and secondly 101 would be on the opposite side of the road?
arjunaraoc (2024-01-11 00:46:44+00:00): Check my update: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146123447
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145750360
arjunaraoc (2024-01-11 00:40:52+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
Check my update: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146123365
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145750419
Minh Nguyen (2024-01-13 02:54:19+00:00): Looks like the individual ways got added to the I-11 superrelation instead of the northbound and southbound route relations. They need to be moved to these relations:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14104671
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14104672
Joseph R P (2024-01-13 05:43:05+00:00): Dammit, thanks for letting me know. I'll fix it.

Normally I catch myself just before I add objects to the super relation, but the one time it was a big edit I slip up.
citrula (2024-01-01 03:22:29+00:00): You can press "Q" to square objects you draw in iD!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145750872
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-01-09 13:51:10+00:00): amenity=self_storage ? Is it simply a shop=storage_rental? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%253Dstorage_rental Or is it selling boxes/packaging?

If it is certainly shop=storage_rental - would it be safe to mass-retag it without inspecting individual cases for all objects tagged this way?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1209934109
Emilius123 (2024-01-22 23:33:09+00:00): Hey, hast du Bock, bei dir im Bett etwas #Gayming zu betreiben?
wyskoj (2024-01-01 04:41:35+00:00): Oops, I mean Pine Ridge Estates in the edit description.
Hans Thompson (2024-01-01 20:24:02+00:00): Open Street Map naming conventions are to stay close to what is used by people on the ground.  While this name is specific, it would be closer to use the generalized Brown Jug since very few folk would know it's #251 or say Muldoon after it.
Allison P (2024-01-02 03:28:13+00:00): I think it is okay to tag like:

name=Brown Jug
ref=251
branch=Muldoon

But branch name is not so important... can probably leave it off
Supaplex (2024-01-05 10:56:00+00:00): 為何要移除兩間學校的地址與維基媒體連結呢？
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145752270
Hans Thompson (2024-01-01 20:18:26+00:00): the cuisine here is not mexican but primarily cafe pastries
CurlingMan13 (2024-01-02 01:06:36+00:00): Removed cuisine=mexican tag in CS:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145780557
tyfi (2024-01-01 05:43:21+00:00): I also used USGSHydroCached layer for Wolf Creek name
KevinOs (2024-01-01 06:39:05+00:00): Sorry about the giant edit.  Repairing the RMGW as it was a bit of a mess of tags and routes.  Consolidating into one super route. Probably need to break out the north and south routes further as they are pretty big. Lots of missing connections need to be added and alignments fixed up along the way. Hopefully nothing is broken, will repair if so.
tyfi (2024-01-01 06:54:19+00:00): This one also used USGSHydroCached layer for name of Upper Castor River
iigmir (2024-01-01 11:26:59+00:00): 您好。如您所知，俄語及烏克蘭語並不一樣，維基百科的條目也不一樣。台灣人視俄語及烏克蘭語為同等的外語，而非哪個是官方語言，哪個應該被替代的語言。因此，兩種語言都應當同時存在。

Hello, as you know, the Russian language is different from the Ukrainian language, as well as their Wikipedia entry. They are all seen as foreign languages by the Taiwanese. Neither one of them is seen as an official language, or something should be replaced by another. Therefore, the Russian name and Ukrainian name should co-exist.
iigmir (2024-01-01 11:39:33+00:00): 補回去了。
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145758636
user_17222985 (2024-01-02 08:27:42+00:00): you messed something up
I remember well that I did not delete name ru

I deleted only the Russian Wikipedia because the Russian language has nothing to do with Taiwan and also because the Russian Wikipedia is a super lying abomination
iigmir (2024-01-03 03:11:56+00:00): While it's reasonable to delete the Russian Wikipedia entry because the Russian language has nothing to do with Taiwan, the quality (or accuracy, etc) of the Russian Wikipedia is not.

By the way, since it is true that the Russian Wikipedia has nothing to do with Taiwan, I deleted all the Kaohsiung Wikipedia entries besides Chinese, Min-nan, Hakka and Sakizaya, which all seen as national languages in Taiwan.
user_17222985 (2024-01-03 05:25:18+00:00): were there mistakes in my comment in traditional chinese? Because I used Bing Translate
iigmir (2024-01-03 13:27:16+00:00): No, there were no mistakes in your comment in traditional Chinese. I see no mistakes in your comment in English as well. What's your concern?
user_17222985 (2024-01-04 07:08:57+00:00): You've answered the question
Реdактор (2024-01-02 06:21:05+00:00): Ты адекватный?!! Зачем ты удалил луг который я очень долго делал? Я как лучше хочу вообще-то
gscholz (2024-01-02 08:03:07+00:00): HI Реdактор,
thanks for your question. My comment for this changeset translated to russish means: Исправить самопересечение

The view for the errors to be fixed is delivered by OSMI, which means "OSM Inspector":

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=46.46024&lat=42.12964&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.67&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways 

There are even much more errors as your "grassland" overlaps widely with the existing "wood" areas which were added 6 years ago.

So please respect the existing wood areas and fix your errors. I recommend to study the documentation for multipolygons first:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon

Kind regards
Guido
Jordi MF (2024-01-01 20:59:34+00:00): Hola Robert,

Siento decirte que OpenStreetMap no es el lugar indicado para añadir páginas web publicitarias o personales. Deben mapearse elementos que existan físicamente,

Saludos,
Jordi
Fedurli (2024-01-02 00:55:34+00:00): Affermazione che non mi risulta; anche qui "borgata" è un nome colloquiale e non ufficiale, tant'è che alle volte è chiamato "borgo Spinerano" o semplicemente "Spinerano", come indicano il nome della strada e della chiesa.
Questo è un luogo in cui neighbourhood calza perfettamente:  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Tag:place%3Dneighbourhood

Bisogna anche ragionare in termini di lettura della mappa, dove a livelli di zoom bassi non devono apparire mille località insignificanti.
rskedgell (2024-01-01 12:15:40+00:00): Thanks for updating the speed limit.

The access was already tagged correctly: access=private + bus=yes means that only buses (and vehicles explicitly authorised by the operator) may use the road.

access=bus has no defined meaning and might be ignored by routing software entirely, effectively making the road accessible to all. This is the opposite of your stated intent.

Access tags corrected.
rskedgell (2024-01-01 11:48:06+00:00): Yes, they are. That's what "except=psv" meant in the restriction relations you deleted, so the net effect of your edit is to allow *everything* to enter the bus station.

Please familiarise yourself with the documentation on restriction relations before you start deleting them.

Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145759048