piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Senihtu (2026-01-31 06:43:00+00:00): Guten Morgen!
Hier hast Du den Straßennamen berichtigt.
Hat es einen Grund, warum Du addr:street der anliegenden Häuser nicht angefasst hast oder sollte der Straßenname dort auch geändert werden?
Gruß
Senithu
Ótzï fón GlüϷgor (2026-01-31 12:56:46+00:00): Hallo Senithu,
das hat den Grund, da ich einfach vergessen haben die Tags anzupassen, dies werde ich nachholen. Danke für den Hinweis!
Gruß,
Otzie
Ótzï fón GlüϷgor (2026-01-31 12:59:43+00:00): https://rossdorf.de/suche-rossdorf-de/item/213-kinderortsplan.html
Hier eine offizielle Quelle, das Problem der Roßörfer Straße ist, dass direkt auf dem Straßenschild selber Roßdorfer Straße steht, aber im Ortsplan der Gemeinde, auf Google Maps und überall sonst steht Roßdörfer Straße. Habe deswegen schon die Gemeinde angeschrieben, da antwortet aber niemand, wahrscheinlich werden die's selbst nicht genau wissen. Die Leute in der Straße selbst, sagen sie wohnen in der Roßdörfer Straße
Senihtu (2026-01-31 13:17:12+00:00): och nee - noch so ein Teil. Kann mer mache nix. Höchstens einen note-tag an den way.
Aber da ich jetzt weiß, das Du Dich dort auskennst werde ich da nichts machen.
schönes Wochenende noch!
eggie (2025-12-24 08:17:55+00:00): reverted by Wijzigingenset #176341829
eggie (2025-12-24 08:17:09+00:00): reverted by Wijzigingenset #176341762
eggie (2025-12-24 08:15:40+00:00): Alle gebouwen zijn directe import vanuit de BAG. Je kunt geen luchtfoto's die schuin genomen zijn gebruiken om gebowuen uit te lijnen. Dus niet naar de dakranden kijken.
Liever niets aan veranderen.
Wanneer je iets opnieuw wil indelen kun je building:part vlakken op de import apart intekenen.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-12-24 08:16:35+00:00): reverted by Wijzigingenset #176341762
rempshaener (2025-12-24 15:04:25+00:00): Hallo,

du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitung gebeten.
Dazu folgende Anmerkung:
Hydranten sollten nicht mit Straßen, Gebäuden u. ä. verbunden werden. Das lässt sich leicht beheben: im Editor markieren und „E“ drücken – das löst den Hydranten von der Linie. 
Ich habe gesehen, dass du den Hydranten ursprünglich angelegt hast, daher auch noch folgende Anmerkungen:
- Es fehlt noch die Angabe couplings=3
- operator: In OSM wird nicht abgekürzt, daher bitte „Gemeinde Offenberg“ statt „Gem. Offenberg“
- ref: Hier wird ausschließlich die Hydrantennummer erfasst, wie sie oben rechts auf dem Hydrantenschild ausgewiesen ist. Also nicht „Penzenried-Aschenau Nr. 42“ o. ä.
- Die flow_rate ist ohne Einheit angegeben. Sie wird in der Regel in l/min angegeben.

Bei Fragen bitte melden.

Viele Grüße
von_wolkenstein (2025-12-28 17:33:21+00:00): Bus 7 rijdt inmiddels weer via de Laan van Chartroise met Bushalte Ondiep ipv de tijdelijke halte op de Royaard v/d Hamkade. Ik heb geprobeerd het zelf aan te passen, maar ben nog een beetje onervaren dus het lukte niet direct. Hoe kan de route aangepast worden?
Zie voor de route bijvoorbeeld; https://9292.nl/app/journey/i4MBAICqqqrq_3Rn8FuqQapZukNE6s0yDAzAE8zdI9wtwwHyJq4m5qbgaqYGukS4Q0CYb3972_r3Qb3breEEwwCzVIfDcBgGmGPOzR136LDUvvWFiiK3ZmQoFLLYZHmRFc9t_qxkoaT8IXMlJQQqE3yao3HTju77NF7YH_pTdHOAmpK1AjV5hpICtfEh7oxlKJzJ3sx0hUBtPMNxmJVwM0B9ofJuPvR9TdpYEx_bTm8ptpO2qeN3Hoy2vCoFVE82sEDDIZzFxfDjju6nmVllJK9G39LcOE03wrTzf4H9ju6tpw-2zlkNrORZ471vgdq7cdtBIUXPeog_LykMZCNnl-Sv2QdNWUwPa2_UMQS2oeEraR8zGvLMAZXENOKqIPTR3uTw8-k2fK04krEBKhd4tTSdTRxKrTkEcymOtmb2o0uRkdE_De7zoHWaadIPqOgTC7TFX5f8xI8X1306PFHt_7-tXsq31XFfVqvVn2UjN8vTspbLsvzO5aYo1mdkv6RcLwsEWtcKRYjFkmftSJVpnqInshB4N7QGzSk7jw4KEChNmWhBoDF9PPgjjXNprfvkDqonG_jbAA
rempshaener (2025-12-24 15:07:55+00:00): Hallo,

du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitung gebeten.
Das Feld "couplings" bleibt bei Unterflurhydranten leer, da es sich um die „Angabe der vorhandenen Anzahl an Schlauchanschlüssen“ handelt, siehe osm.wiki/DE:Key:couplings?uselang=de. Unterflurhydranten haben in der Regel nur mit Standrohr eine Schlauchkupplung. 
Im Übrigen siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176330543

Viele Grüße
eggie (2025-12-24 08:47:49+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
NeisBot (2025-12-24 03:56:12+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your changesets and noticed that the cumulative count of your recent edits (20 changesets) shows that 2101 of your last 2146 changes were deletions. This is quite an unusual proportion, so I wanted to check with you.

Could you please confirm whether these deletions were intentional or if they may have occurred by mistake?

#DeletionsCheck #Cumulative
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?uid=23641729
Taya_S (2025-12-24 06:52:58+00:00): Reverted unexplained deletions

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176339275
eggie (2025-12-24 08:48:44+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Piagno (2026-01-03 14:20:31+00:00): with this changeset you rerouted the s3 and s33 between basel and muttenz via the wrong line, it goes via "Basel Güterbahnhof" and the newly built bridge.
And for S3 wrong platform in Basel SBB.
Fav40 (2026-01-04 07:30:06+00:00): Sorry for the mistake. I've corrected it (changeset 176807929).
Piagno (2026-01-04 08:08:39+00:00): thanks :)
SamuelTheCamel (2026-01-24 00:45:14+00:00): Hey, as a local here, Big Hollow Road used to connect here, but this part of the road was removed a long time ago. Do you have a source for the road being reconnected like you have mapped here?
Taya_S (2025-12-24 06:49:20+00:00): Reverted unexplained deletions

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176339164
Arflha (2025-12-24 11:54:41+00:00): Salut,
Merci de ne pas supprimer les rues pour les recréer 5 minutes plus tard en ayant supprimé la source:geometry.
SomeoneElse (2026-01-15 12:22:56+00:00): Hello padvinder,
You added a few buildings here 22 days ago, but they really don't seem to exist on the Bing imagery now.  As an example, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1460891851/history was deleted - on the imagery I can see an adjacent building that another mapper added https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1466544835 but not yours.
Do you have any idea what might be happening?
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2026-01-15 12:23:21+00:00): Hallo padvinder,
Je hebt hier 22 dagen geleden een paar gebouwen toegevoegd, maar die lijken nu niet meer op de Bing-afbeeldingen te staan. Zo is bijvoorbeeld https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1460891851/history verwijderd. Op de afbeeldingen zie ik wel een aangrenzend gebouw dat een andere mapper heeft toegevoegd: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1466544835, maar niet dat van jou.

Heb je enig idee wat er aan de hand kan zijn?

Met vriendelijke groet,
Andy
padvinder (2026-01-16 00:23:52+00:00): no
JoeG (2025-12-30 23:57:07+00:00): Hi! Thanks for adding the extra detail added to this area.
This changeset does delete parts of buildings. These will need to be re-added add some point. It also deletes a fence and a hedge and I plan to revert those deletions.
DeanBA (2026-01-01 01:02:35+00:00): Please note that I have now withdrawn from all further updating to OpenStreet Map and I will be asking the moderators to delete my account and delete ALL of my changes to date. I am sincerely sorry for all the hassle I have caused , just trying to do some good. I feel embarrassed and humiliated on the barrage of comments over the last couple of days.
JoeG (2026-01-01 22:16:37+00:00): I'm sorry to hear that. That wasn't my intention. You've done a lot of good with many great additions. Adding fences back will not be difficult, if you're ok with me doing so. In any case I wish you a happy new year!
Taya_S (2025-12-24 06:49:21+00:00): Reverted unexplained deletions

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176339164
b-jazz (2026-01-01 02:28:18+00:00): RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1433425782

You have made a common error when you saw a fairway that looked like it didn't have a proper "Feature Type" defined and you decided to add the fairway tag. The hole was already properly tagged, but was part of a relation of multiple objects known as a multipolygon. Please read this short wiki where I've tried to explain what you are looking at and avoid making the mistake in the future. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ID_understanding_golf_course_relations

Thanks.
b-jazz (2026-01-01 02:31:59+00:00): And thanks for being responsive to changeset comments in the past maddog, we appreciate it.
maddog107 (2026-01-01 02:40:11+00:00): oh i see, i understand what you are saying. the fairway is already marked in the "outer" relationship so it is not needed to mark golf=fairway again. ok thanks for the info
maddog107 (2026-01-01 02:40:52+00:00): also np, i reply to all change-set comments
user_5359 (2025-12-24 08:06:02+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice the difference between a name and a description. 
If you need more information (and cannot find any examples or ask anyone else), please visit our wiki at https://wiki.osm.org.
JoeG (2025-12-30 23:51:31+00:00): Hi! This changeset deletes tree rows and fences that I intend to revert.
rempshaener (2025-12-24 14:40:43+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.
Du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Grundsätzlich ist deine Ergänzung richtig und nachvollziehbar, schwierig ist nur, dass die Objekte, an denen du das ergänzt hast, es so eigentlich nicht geben dürfte.
Die Fußgängerüberwege sind drei- statt einmal erfasst. Ich werden den Mapper, der die entsprechenden Überwege erstellt hat, darauf hinweisen. Also eigentlich alles richtig gemacht!
Vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag und weiterhin viel Spaß beim Mappen.
Viele Grüße
rempshaener (2025-12-24 14:52:16+00:00): siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174393057
TonySpegel (2025-12-24 23:58:25+00:00): Dankeschön, vielen Dank für den Hinweis! Ich arbeite gerade mit der PBF File von Thüringen und schaue mir gerade vor allem (mit osm2psql konvertiert) mit SQL Ampeln an und was ich daraus so lesen/ergänzen kann.

Nur für mich zum nachvollziehen: es sollte quasi nur "highway=crossing + crossing=traffic_signals" in der Mitte des Pfades sein, aber nicht zusätzlich die beiden Ampeln? Oder ist es andersherum? Danke auf jeden Fall, ist ziemlich interessant mit den Daten zu arbeiten
rempshaener (2025-12-25 08:43:34+00:00): Ja genau, so ist die "einfache" Variante.
Ansonsten ein paar Erläuterungen noch hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174393057.
❤️‍🔥 (2026-05-20 13:10:17+00:00): hey bro, could you take a look at this changeset please: https://osm.org/changeset/182855483

according to that changset, this is not an average speed camera. but I'm pretty sure there is an average speed camera around here 🤷
mapnerd🤓 (2026-05-21 03:25:59+00:00): Hi, yes, they are right, that specific one is a spot speed. NZTA has just released a new web page with all the updated locations here: https://www.nzta.govt.nz/safety/driving-safely/safety-cameras/about-safety-cameras/fixed-safety-camera-locations#police-sites-auckland

I thought the average speed cameras were going to be placed on Dairy Flat Highway, not Pine Valley Road north of Dairy Flat Highway. It makes no sense to me, but whatever, anyways everything's sorted 😃👍
❤️‍🔥 (2026-05-22 06:41:54+00:00): brilliant, thanks for checking :)
NeisBot (2025-12-27 16:49:10+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/10076477936 v3

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Lingerie store at this location"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description
NeisBot (2026-01-02 11:59:34+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/176739748
(Only the affected tags were deleted; other unrelated data was left untouched)
NeisBot (2025-12-27 16:49:11+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/10083850937 v5

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Lingerie store"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description
NeisBot (2026-01-02 11:59:35+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/176739750
(Only the affected tags were deleted; other unrelated data was left untouched)
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-07-08 18:01:51+00:00): Hello!

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13399077519 are you sure that hump is only on footway?

have you wanted to map kerb?
Bienson (2025-12-24 05:39:35+00:00): Poller müssen auf Wegen platziert werden:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:barrier=bollard?uselang=de
Glassman (2025-12-25 00:39:52+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176333546
Glassman (2025-12-25 00:40:05+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176333576
uknown-gryphus (2025-12-24 04:05:55+00:00): Hi, Varthur Road is not under construction. Could you elaborate on the ground truth used here, since it doesn't seem to match with what is on the ground?
syedk (2025-12-24 04:39:52+00:00): Hi, Since Delivery Executives are not using this road in many trips given as road under construction. Now its updated. We make sure to check it before giving as road closure.  Thank you for your Suggestion.
bxl-forever (2025-12-24 09:08:23+00:00): Thanks for this.

But when you do this, always make sure to tag it as private. By default, swimming pools are shown as open to anyone, which is probably not the case here.
Taya_S (2025-12-24 06:49:22+00:00): Reverted unexplained deletions

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176339164
i2004 (2025-12-24 11:52:02+00:00): gracias por revertirme el ramal saavedra
Bienson (2025-12-24 05:42:53+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176337451 - die Gebäudeumrisse waren vorher korrekt - direkt importiert aus den Katasterdaten. Siehe iD-Bildmaterial "NRW Liegenschaftskataster".
Bienson (2025-12-24 05:46:57+00:00): Bei als Linie eingezeichneten Toren muss weiterhin der Kreuzungs-Node von Weg und Tor zusätzlich als Tor (barrier=gate) eingetragen werden.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:barrier%3Dgate
pwbriggs (2025-12-24 03:35:04+00:00): Oops, I mis-clicked in JOSM and uploaded by accident! But this changeset adds a couple missing buildings on Lake Tapps Island A.
Frans S (2025-12-28 09:17:36+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
Issues found on your mappings
A: Inaccurate mapping. 
B: Overlapping buildings.
C: Collected adjacent buildings and mapped it as 1 building.
D: Connecting nodes to other features.
E: Buildings not squared or rounded.


Explanation can be found in this document, which might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176334433
Taya_S (2025-12-24 06:49:23+00:00): Reverted unexplained deletions

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176339164
b-holdet (2025-12-25 14:06:24+00:00): Der er allerede et træ angivet på stedet med navnet.
Desuden er det ikke en monument.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic=monument?uselang=da

Jeg har reverteret din ændring.
Aethonatic (2025-12-24 11:08:48+00:00): Please keep changesets local to prevent large bounding boxes like this from being created.
mueschel (2025-12-25 09:11:36+00:00): Please don't add 47 (!) images to a single object. OSM is not a gallery. 
If there are many images, you can link e.g. to a wikimedia_commons category.
KennyDap (2025-12-24 23:56:18+00:00): Fix Vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176379337
eggie (2025-12-24 08:51:24+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback Je kunt gewoon schuiven met die adresnodes, maar waarom ligt nr 10 nu ergens buiten het gebouw?
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=176335813

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-12-24 08:56:14+00:00): Adresnode 10 heb ik op het gebouw gezet waar het ongeveer vandaan kwam.
MVG
eggie
Adam Franco (2025-12-24 04:50:09+00:00): I uploaded with the wrong user account

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176335992
Adam Franco (2025-12-24 04:52:17+00:00): Re-added with correct user account

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176336031
John Kastner (2025-12-24 13:30:00+00:00): Hi, I've fixed the dragged nodes in this change. It also looks like you didn't actually make an address fix in it, so there might be some changes here you still want to make.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176362492
NeisBot (2025-12-27 16:49:14+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13399217139 v1

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Law office"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description
NeisBot (2026-01-01 18:37:45+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/176341195
Thanks @user_5359
Dindia (2026-01-20 10:01:32+00:00): Hi,

You changed the rating to grade1 . 
Is the route paved?

Solid[1].
Usually a paved surface (called also Sealed road), often also tagged with surface=asphalt;concrete;chipseal;paved etc.
Yitzchak M (2026-01-20 10:16:57+00:00): Yes, it is paved but in bad condition. In the OSM group, a while back, Harel Mazor very clearly defined Grade 1 and I abide by it.

Are you checking ALL my work? Do you do this for everybody?
Dindia (2026-01-20 11:12:13+00:00): Thanks for confirming.
Then according to OSM it's grade1, regardless of Harel Mazor. 

I check when I suspect there's some misunderstanding in mapping
Taya_S (2025-12-24 06:49:24+00:00): Reverted unexplained deletions

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176339164
user_5359 (2025-12-25 17:51:42+00:00): Hello! Please don't copy the working steps: Execute the working steps!
olo81 (2025-12-25 16:22:37+00:00): do poprawy, brak source:maxspeed=PL:urban
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:maxspeed
VlIvYur (2025-12-26 10:59:16+00:00): Hello
What is currency:v?
NeisBot (2025-12-27 16:49:16+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13399400031 v1

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Tattoo and piercing studio in Sauble Beach Ontario"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description
NeisBot (2026-01-01 18:37:45+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/176340969
Thanks @user_5359
Dimitar155 (2025-12-26 12:25:11+00:00): Данните в повечето приложения се обновяват толкова бавно, че докато се покаже това работно време, ще е станало 2026-та. Отделно утре ще трябва да махнете тези данни, тъй като няма да са актуални :). 

Поради тази причина се избягва отбелязването на толкова краткотрайни промени, като работно време на Коледа, Великден и т.н.

Изключение би било ако се знае (или някъде го пише) че не работят на празници. За справка - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours#Closed_on_holidays
Anonymous36863 (2025-12-26 13:52:40+00:00): По-добре от нищо.
NeisBot (2025-12-27 16:49:19+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13399426710 v1

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "barber shop thecut oemah"
---
Misalnya, versi yang lebih netral dan faktual dari deskripsi Anda bisa jadi: "barber shop thecut oemah"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description
NeisBot (2026-01-02 11:59:36+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/176739751
(Only the affected tags were deleted; other unrelated data was left untouched)
CAM-Gerlach (2025-12-24 21:38:59+00:00): Hey, thanks for the fix!

Although, shouldn't `healthcare=occupational_therapist` https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Ahealthcare%3Doccupational_therapist be used instead/as well, as it has nearly 20x the usage per taginfo (1853 versus 125), has a full wiki page and is documented on the main approved `key:healthcare` page, whereas healthcare:specialty just has a stub page and isn't included in the main key:healthcare:specialty page?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176341614
thetornado76 (2025-12-24 22:14:48+00:00): Hello,
Probably healthcare = occupational_therapist would be even better here. But I didn't want to simply change that, I just made the healthcare:speciality correction. 
Best regards
CAM-Gerlach (2025-12-25 00:09:17+00:00): Sure, understood--correcting the immediate issue was the higher-priority change. I went ahead and changed it to `healthcare=occupational_therapist` in addition in changeset #176379470 . Thanks again!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176341614
itineris (2026-06-24 07:04:24+00:00): Szia!

Ha javítod a sávok számát, kérlek, figyelj a lanes:forward/:backward és a turn:lanes:* értékekre is!

Köszönöm:
Ákos
george1201 (2025-12-25 22:14:20+00:00): Worauf gründet das Fußgängerverbot?
demon_mc (2025-12-26 12:42:54+00:00): Es handelt sich um die Auffahrt zu einer Schnellstraße. Es ist keinerlei Fläche für Fußgänger vorgesehen. Und ein Fußgänger darf Schnellstraßen nicht betreten. https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kraftfahrstra%C3%9Fe