piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
felipeeugenio (2023-10-20 19:10:33+00:00): Hola. Un centro reproductivo de de Sangre es lo mismo que un hospital?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142887331
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-21 02:43:41+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142904718
eggie (2023-10-20 20:26:51+00:00): Thanks
groet
eggie
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-21 02:42:10+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142904676
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-21 02:42:04+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142904673
silversurfer83 (2023-10-21 16:36:50+00:00): Gude :)

du hast hier bei einer Linie die Eigenschaft "boundary=postal_code" entfernt. Warum?

https://osmcha.org/changesets/142888246 

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142888246
Atten007 (2023-10-22 08:51:34+00:00): Oh, das war wohl ein Versehen! Ist mir nicht aufgefallen :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142888246
silversurfer83 (2023-10-22 10:01:36+00:00): Alles klar. Kann passieren 😄
Stellst du sie wieder her?
Atten007 (2023-10-22 10:18:03+00:00): Ja, sehr gerne! Wie mache ich das denn nochmal? Muss ich da einfach wieder "boundry: postal-code" oder so was ähnliches einfügen?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142888246
silversurfer83 (2023-10-22 12:21:03+00:00): Genau. Du kannst in dieser osmcha Ansicht, die ich dir verlinkt habe einfach die Linie auswählen und dann in der Ansicht unten rechts auf "open in iD" gehen dann ist sie ausgewählt. Dann einfach die entfernte Eigenschaft wieder eingeben
Atten007 (2023-10-22 15:48:36+00:00): erledigt :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142888246
soljiv (2023-11-23 15:16:42+00:00): Has this been prescribed as a bus route only?
confusedbuffalo (2023-11-23 17:38:53+00:00): I don't know, why do you think it is?
MxxCon (2023-10-20 19:52:23+00:00): Hello.
Please note that this is incorrect way to tag a sidewalk. The previous tags were correct.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142889213
Lifeina360degreeview (2023-10-20 23:15:37+00:00): thanks did not realized i caused a change.
emersonveenstra (2023-10-21 20:47:18+00:00): Why did you delete the amenity=school tag from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/260344944#map=17/42.01044/-83.95809&layers=N?
WMA_Travel (2023-10-22 01:18:10+00:00): Because the building was already tagged as a school and it eliminated a Warning in JOSM
Allison P (2023-10-22 17:15:23+00:00): Don't make changes just to get rid of validator warnings.
WMA_Travel (2023-10-22 20:48:56+00:00): Well was the change correct or wrong.
Allison P (2023-10-22 22:53:04+00:00): The inner school probably never should have been tagged to begin with, but in any case it no longer exists so I deleted it.
mindB (2023-10-29 04:31:14+00:00): I'm not sure if I agree that this fits the definition of highway=secondary. While it's certainly the faster route to take in some circumstances, it's clearly not intended as a link for through-traffic between Ludington and Manistee (as can be seen by the number of stop-signs and jogs along this route). I realize the difference between tertiary and secondary is even more ill-defined than the rest of the road classifications, but to me this route is no more than tertiary.
SomeoneElse (2024-09-12 11:01:47+00:00): Hello,
What's the source of the name "Army Medical Services Training Centre (Towthorpe Lines)"?
Best Regards,
Andy
thx811 (2024-09-12 18:26:24+00:00): Hi Andy
Most sources refer to it as one name or the other, rather than both.

There is a press article which does refer to both names as being one place (https://www.thenorthernecho.co.uk/news/14124614.military-medics-front-line-battle-ebola-honoured/)

There's a few MOD documents that refer to the site as Towthorpe Lines –
- 2016 Better Defence Estate strategy (https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/better-defence-estate-strategy)
- Annex A - Estate Baseline 2009 (https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/defence-estates-development-plan-dedp-2009)
- a press article also refers to it and the neighbouring Queen Elizabeth Barracks (https://www.yorkpress.co.uk/news/24217321.strensall-barracks-saved-york-army-base-will-not-sold-off-mod/)

Finally, there is an official X account for the Army Medical Services Training Centre (https://x.com/amstc1?lang=en) 

Hope that helps.
SomeoneElse (2024-09-13 09:30:52+00:00): X is inaccessible to anyone and the two press articles will just be regurgitating press releases from the MOD, which leaves a couple of recent (post 2009) documents from them.  Even https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/63ca9693d3bf7f24b35c0f32/FOI2022-09171.pdf , despite looking like something from the 1970s, is dated 2021.
My guess is that someone there got confused and "Towthorpe Lane" (as Towthorpe Moor Lane is also commonly called) got made into "Towthorpe Line" (see https://www.arrse.co.uk/wiki/5_Regt_RA , https://ffhyork.weebly.com/uploads/8/2/0/5/8205739/ordnance_depot_railway_-_historical_notes_maps_and_pictures.pdf et al).
Historically it was always just "REME" (the operators of the site before the Army medics moved in) and gets referred to that in error even recently: https://www.itv.com/news/calendar/update/2017-04-03/travel-strensall-barracks-area-north-yorks-crash/ .
joost schouppe (2023-10-23 09:36:51+00:00): Hoi GR-menneke,
Zou je niet liever leren werken met de import tool? Zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Belgium/Building_and_address_import
Steeds welkom in de chatgroep rond dat thema
GR-menneke (2023-10-23 18:07:20+00:00): Dag Joost,
Ik zou dat zeer handig vinden ;-).
Er heeft vorig jaar nog iemand mij op die tool gewezen maar niemand kan mij precies eens voordoen hoe die tool in de praktijk werkt.

GRoetjes,
GR-menneke
Ivan Lievens (2023-11-04 15:00:26+00:00): Als dat niet superdringend is zie ik dat wel zitten. Ik moet zelf nog ontwaken uit mijn openstreetmap-zomerslaap, maar nadien moet dat zeker kunnen.
GR-menneke (2023-11-06 20:33:34+00:00): Dag Ivan,
Dringend is dat voor mij niet. Dus doe gerust een aantal voorstellen wanneer dit voor jou zou gaan.

Met dankbare GRoetjes,

GR-menneke
MxxCon (2023-10-22 16:47:43+00:00): Hello.
Please note that all crosswalks must be connected to their intersecting roads and the intersection node must have the correct tags as well.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142890335
NorthCrab_upload (2023-10-20 20:00:33+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/234820250

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
user_5359 (2023-10-27 16:21:04+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1216956115, https://www.osm.org/way/1216956116. What is the mean of the tag Type=Park?
Did you know https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark? 
Please also note that keys are usually written in lower case and the key type is reserved for the data type Relation.

¡Bienvenido a OSM! Por favor, echa un vistazo en https://www.osm.org/way/1216956115, https://www.osm.org/way/1216956116. ¿Qué significa la etiqueta Type=Park?
¿Conocías https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark? 
Tenga en cuenta también que las claves se escriben generalmente en minúsculas y el tipo de clave está reservado para el tipo de datos Relation
user_21425661 (2024-08-12 10:25:52+00:00): These really could do with an access tag.
Glassman (2023-10-22 18:04:27+00:00): #TIP: OSM spells out street addresses - the reason is that software has a hard time unabbreviating
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142891393
Robhubi (inaktiv) (2023-11-14 18:43:08+00:00): Der iD-Editor kann mit Relationen nicht gut umgehen, siehe Issue https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/8578 
Auch hier hat er bei der Member Order der Relation 13023171 gepatzt. JOSM ist in dieser Hinsicht die Referenz.
silversurfer83 (2023-10-21 15:27:28+00:00): Gude missio-camper :)

gut, dass du dich um die B252 kümmerst und in Form der Bitte um Review quasi ein wenig um Hilfe bittest.

Ich hätte da anmerkungen:
Grundsätzlich sehen deine Änderungen der letzten Tage nicht verkehrt aus. Heute hast du jedoch auch Straßenabschnitte gelöscht, die auch auf dem Luftbild noch zu sehen sind. Für Objekte, die auf aktuellen Luftbildern und ggf. dem Kataster noch vorhanden sind empfiehlt sich ein Lifecycle Prefix zu nutzen:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix
Die ways und nodes bleiben, die relevanten eigenschaften werden angepasst und bekommen Vorsätze wie "disused:" oder "razed:" und gerne auch eine "note=*was ist hier los*" um zu verhindern, dass andere hier die Objekte vom Luftbild wieder einzeichnen.
Wenn dann die Luftbilder aktuell sind können Objekte, von denen auf dem Boden NICHTS mehr zu sehen ist, gerne gelöscht werden.

Bei Fragen, immer raus damit :)

(ich lade übrigens gerade ganz frische Bilder von der Umgehung Itter auf kartaview hoch. Wenn der Server mal ein bisschen in die Kontakte kommt, sind die auch bald online)

grüße
silversurfer83
missio-camper (2023-10-23 08:58:21+00:00): Hey silversurfer83, vielen Dank für Dein ausführliches Feedback!
Da kann ich gut mit arbeiten und bin auf Deine Fotos gespannt.
LG, missio-camper
MxxCon (2023-10-22 18:04:45+00:00): Hello.
When mapping sidewalks please connect them to each other where appropriate to create a proper navigable way route. A bunch of disconnected ways are useless for routing.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142891787
5m4u9 (2023-10-21 19:36:16+00:00): Hola, el cambio que hiciste restableciendo la avenida (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/366981456) ya no existe por construcción del puente.

la imagen satelital no es actual, las obras de construcción comenzaron a principio del mes.
5m4u9 (2023-10-21 19:38:22+00:00): Aún estoy averiguando los desvíos de las rutas de transporte público que van de sur a norte sobre esa avenida.
LockOnGuy (2023-10-28 15:34:01+00:00): Street signs are in Arabic. 'name' tag should be in language on the street sign.    
China Town in the US for examples have street signs in English, their ethnicity doesn't affect the language of the street sign.          
Please revert your edit.      
Regards.
Bravo Mapper (2024-01-24 08:12:04+00:00): In USA, street signs are in English because the constitution says that.
In Iraq, street signs are in both Kurdish & Arabic because the constitution says that.
Dont be that much cheating and pretend that you dont know anything about the Iraqi constitution and the 70 years struggle in Kirkuk.
LockOnGuy (2024-01-24 08:16:55+00:00): No, there is no language in US constitution.     
And for Iraq, yes Kurdish is considered also an official with the Arabic language, but here in OSM we follow the street signs, and the main language at top the street signs in Kirkuk is Arabic. English Kurdish and turkmen are right after Arabic.
Bravo Mapper (2024-01-24 08:51:39+00:00): Listen. They are not right after.
They are side by side.
Do not bring superiority to the map.
Kirkuk is disputed area by the constitution.
It has different rules.
The four languages come side by side.
LockOnGuy (2024-01-24 08:55:03+00:00): Please provide sources to your changeset, I'm still waiting for the photos you wanted to upload.     Regards.
emersonveenstra (2023-10-21 20:44:22+00:00): Reverting this changeset for (probably unintentional) vandalism: Breaking roads by deleting the highway tag, and deleting valid tunnels and culverts without replacing them.

Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142939812
emersonveenstra (2023-10-21 20:45:42+00:00): In the future, please do not delete valid data. Waterways and highways should never be connected to each other unless it's a ford.
WMA_Travel (2023-10-22 01:20:27+00:00): Well, sorry if that was wrong.  I was just eliminating warnings given in JOSM.   I figured that was how it was desired to be mapped now.   I used to map it this way in the past, so I thought it was odd.  I will refrain from doing so in the future.
emersonveenstra (2023-10-23 12:06:45+00:00): No, the correct way is to use a tunnel tag and add layer=-1, not to connect it to the road.
WMA_Travel (2023-10-26 01:09:26+00:00): Sorry.  I read the wiki too quickly before.  Now I re-read it completely to make sure I understand it.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer#:~:text=The%20layer%20%3D*%20tag%20is,ways%20cross%20or%20objects%20overlap.
dknelson9876 (2024-03-28 01:05:39+00:00): Hi Halfdeaf007, did you leave one road disconnected from the roundabout on purpose? You didn't mention construction, and I see no evidence of the road being disconnected in the most recent imagery or streetview
Halfdeaf007 (2024-03-30 13:08:31+00:00): Sorry, I forget to connect the road. I didn't look at my email for a while. So I fix it. Thank you for letting me know.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-10-20 21:10:34+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11278288437
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11278288438
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11278288441

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
MushroomMan (2023-10-20 21:12:39+00:00): Correction: Source used was Bing Streetside.
mueschel (2023-10-30 19:18:16+00:00): Hi,
could you check the tagging you used here? There are several strange tags like 
building feature
shipping container

Please have a look to the wiki how building types are mapped.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-20 22:19:35+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142898008
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-20 22:17:30+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142897945
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-20 22:17:28+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142897942
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-20 22:17:17+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142897931
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-20 22:17:14+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142897924
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-20 22:16:46+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142897902
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-20 22:14:13+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142897813
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-20 22:13:43+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142897797
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-20 22:13:23+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142897784
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-20 22:12:41+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142897768
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-20 22:10:48+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142897719
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-20 22:10:38+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142897700
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-20 22:10:00+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142897686
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-20 22:09:39+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142897667
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-20 22:09:03+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142897652
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-20 22:08:58+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142897644
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-20 22:08:36+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142897628
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-20 22:06:52+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142897545
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-20 22:06:26+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142897523
NorthCrab_upload (2023-10-20 22:00:25+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11278413255

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
5m4u9 (2023-10-21 19:52:12+00:00): hola, el cambio que hiciste contradice las nuevas imágenes a nivel de calle en mapillary y que edite el mapa según esa foto (dirección hacia el este) (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=274095948601204&focus=photo)
danieldegroot2 (2023-12-29 13:23:13+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1217208003
Looks like dry scrubland.
user_11609320 (2023-10-20 22:32:34+00:00): during wet winters, cadiz lake does flood. it is a dry lake and should be tagged as such. blm closes the roads when it gets too muddy. the water just evaporates too quickly 

https://repository.arizona.edu/bitstream/handle/10150/271232/azu_stoffle_cal_llre_final_w.pdf?sequence=1
user_11609320 (2023-10-20 22:45:12+00:00): I seen the link from cadiz inc, but they have vested interest to say the lake bed is empty and never has water because they have a vested interest to keep their 34,000 acre project alive. the aquafer under the lake bed has at least 17 million acre feet of water
Kai Johnson (2024-01-21 18:26:04+00:00): I disagree with the tag change. I don't think natural=water + intermittent=yes captures the nature of this feature. In general, I don't agree that anything that was once ephemerally wet should be tagged with natural=water. For example, should we tag any parking lot that floods when it rains as natural=water + intermittent=yes?
Kai Johnson (2024-01-22 23:18:19+00:00): I'm not sure why the ethnographic study you linked to is relevant. It doesn't seem to say anything about local hydrology. Lots of places get muddy when it rains. We don't tag them as lakes. The natural=water + intermittent=yes tags are not conventional for dry lakes in this area and I strongly object to their use here.
emersonveenstra (2023-10-21 20:48:39+00:00): Hi,

The "name" tag should be the actual name of the station, it should never be "FIXME", that is what the fixme tag is for. Please stop naming things with FIXME, thanks
emersonveenstra (2023-10-21 20:48:57+00:00): *name of the object
LocalMapGuru (2023-10-22 00:07:37+00:00): Hi there!

Ahh ok understood.  Would you like me to go back and remove the naming?

Thanks.
LocalMapGuru (2023-10-22 00:27:50+00:00): Also one more question, for lines that have a known endpoint on one end but not the other, what is your suggestion for naming the line?

Thanks.
LocalMapGuru (2023-10-22 05:56:58+00:00): All "FIXME" naming should be gone in Michigan.  Please check my work in case I missed one.  They have all been replaced with fixme requests.

Thanks.
emersonveenstra (2023-10-23 12:09:45+00:00): Thanks! I'm not an infrastructure mapper, so i'm not sure what the best practices are surrounding that, might have to check the wiki or ask in Slack/Discord
LocalMapGuru (2023-10-25 00:31:11+00:00): Thanks for the reply!

Ok good to know thank you!  If you do come across something weird in the future, please don't hesitate to reach out to me again!

Thanks.
sndstrm (2023-11-09 08:06:40+00:00): Die Gebäude lagen korrekt ineinander, da einzelne Boxen in einer Lagerhalle stehen.
mariotomo (2023-10-23 04:39:30+00:00): Hola. También hay un arroyo por aquí, y una cascada? El área de recreación, sabes indicar su extensión?
mariotomo (2023-10-23 04:34:14+00:00): Hola, bienvenido a OSM! El área que pusiste, se refiere al edificio, o a la extensión del conjunto escolar? En el primer caso la etiqueta es amenity = school; en el segundo caso building = school. Cuando tenga más tiempo lo reviso, si mientras tanto tienes tiempo, verifica el wiki al propósito.
mariotomo (2023-10-23 04:35:30+00:00): Oops, sorry, puse los casos al revés obviamente.
csomerville (2023-10-21 09:27:27+00:00): I've noticed you adding service=driveway to a number of service roads but from what I've seen it appears most uses are inconsistent with the typical established norm so I'd like to discuss with you.

From my perspective, the service=driveway tag should be used for private or restricted-access roads that lead to a single facility, residence, or small group of buildings. It should almost always be a terminal destination with only one end connected to road network.  

Paths in or around a parking lot (amenity=parking) are tagged with highway=service without service=*, connecting multiple parking aisles (service=parking_aisle) when applicable.
Milroy1812 (2023-10-25 01:14:48+00:00): Thank you for clarifying  the driveway definition.  I guess I either misread or misunderstood the wiki descriptions for the service highway types.  I will go back and fix the tags on service highways that I've tagged this way.
Enock4seth (2023-10-21 08:18:34+00:00): Stop deleting existing features that can be re-used. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/utilsplugin2#Replace_geometry_(Ctrl+Shift+G)
edvac_repair (2023-10-21 22:52:10+00:00): Reverted for mass vandalism. Ticket#2023102110000246

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142942806
Supaplex (2023-10-21 04:00:11+00:00): ->夢仙越南美甲
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142905364
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-21 05:37:19+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142908348
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-21 05:37:09+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142908342
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-21 05:36:55+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142908334
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-21 05:36:41+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142908328
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-21 05:34:32+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142908256
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-21 05:34:27+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142908250
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-21 05:34:19+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142908245
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-21 05:34:10+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142908240
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-21 05:33:59+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142908235
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-21 05:32:06+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142908169
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-21 05:31:56+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142908163
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-21 05:31:48+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142908159
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-21 05:31:36+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142908155
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-21 05:29:42+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142908130
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-21 05:29:29+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142908128
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-21 05:29:16+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142908126
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-21 05:28:59+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142908123
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-21 05:28:27+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142908115
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-21 05:28:15+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142908110
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-21 05:27:40+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142908105
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-21 05:27:31+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142908103
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-21 05:27:20+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142908097
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-21 05:27:08+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142908093