piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
MicDK (2023-01-25 15:40:03+00:00): Som jeg skrev på engelsk:
"I'm using (landuse:farmyards) on open areas around buildings with traffic and no vegetation.

I could have written: ."..open areas around buildings, areas with farmrelated traffic and areas with no vegetation". Hermed præciseret.

"Residential", "courtyard" og "area:highway" er enten ældre fejl, eller forsøg på at få renderet surfaces på farmyards i 3D. 

Det lader sig ikke gøre, da det tilsyneladende sletter renderingen af "farmyard" i alle varianter af 2D rendering. Farmyard vil der altid være et eller andet sted på en landbrugsejendom, så det skal nok komme op ved en søgning.

De andre områder skal jeg nok få rettet tilbage. "Courtyard" kan dog blive anvendt på f.eks. arealer, som helt entydigt kun relaterer til beboelse på en landbrugsejendom. "Landuse:ground" kunne også anvendes, men er mere uspecifik.
osmviborg (2023-01-26 05:22:21+00:00): Og du præciserer, igen, at det for dig, handler om rendering i F4. Du bruger OSM som sandkasse, kan du virkelig ikke se det?
MicDK (2023-01-26 14:42:25+00:00): Sorry to say but further discussions on this topic seems rather futile.

Quoting your own exact words, if you want an overwiew of the "farmyards" in a geografical location, you find it weird to see more then one "landuse:farmyard" on an agricultural holding. What you find weird is solely your personal opinion as long as you can't substantiate it with e.g. extracts from OSM Wiki. 

This dogmatic view leads you to draw only one large "farmyard" for every farm. Thereby distorting and hiding my correct micromapping, which can include more the one "landuse:farmyard" + "surface:*".

Currently neither my "landuse:farmyard" + "surface:*" nor your experiments with "area:highway:*" seems to be rendered in 2D or 3D. It might change over time. Regardless, this kind of mapping is still encouraged in OSM Wiki for bringing a more details to OSM maps.

So let's put this discussion to rest. 

Please acknowledge what OSM Wiki says about micromapping as fully allowed and a positive element for both 2D and 3D mapping

Please acknowledge what the OSM Wiki says about the increasing use of the surface key together with certain types of areas. This is not something, that's advised against.

As a a consequence of this please delete your large "farmyards" on Sønder Vornæsvej 19-21. 

I have modified your large "farmyard" on Vejlen 12.

Best regards
Michael
osmviborg (2023-01-26 15:11:19+00:00): Lad os omdøbe 'Tåsinge' til 'Michael's legeplads'.
MicDK (2023-01-27 08:54:21+00:00): Great proposal! It's a deal! But please don't change the geografical name of the island.

I willl be adjusting some of your changes in the coming days, since you don't seem proned to do so yourself.

Best regards
eggie (2023-03-30 06:58:04+00:00): Dag Rudy   Ga svp geen access=no toevoegen op reguliere verbindingen. 
motor_vehicle=no zal genoeg zijn.

MVG
eggie
Rudy_VR_IJsselland (2023-03-30 08:02:53+00:00): Eggie, bedankt voor de correctie en de tip.
Snalla (2023-01-25 08:22:27+00:00): Source: Maxar Premium Imagery
skyper (2023-02-08 21:49:44+00:00): Hallo Simon,
danke für die Aktualisierung.
Bitte ändere auch die Daten der route_master Relation, wenn Du alle Varianten aktualisierst. Ich hohle das gleich mal nach.
Danke und liebe Grüße,
skyper
michttch (2023-04-27 20:10:59+00:00): Hallo Simon-Koepel,
der Eintrag Bushaltestop Hornusstraße existiert nun doppelt. Deine Eintragung https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10580924481 und die ältere Node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/388213287. Ich nehme an, das war ein versehen und die doppelte Node kann gelöscht werden, da sie ja auch die exakt gleichen Daten enthält?
LG michttch
SekeRob (2023-01-26 12:46:18+00:00): Hi,

Redone all the tags on your POI. If your craft is not carpenter then please change that value, but without a shop, craft key the POI will not show on maps.

ciao
mavl (2023-04-25 09:02:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:05:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:07:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
ToniE (2023-01-27 14:10:13+00:00): Servus,

drei Tipps zum Editieren:

- iD, der Editor im Browser ist nicht wirklich geeignet um Busrelationen zu editieren, JOSM (josm.openstreetmap.de) ist besser - aber gewöhnungsbedürtig

- Straßen müssen in type=route Relationen rein, nicht in type=route_master - liegt wohl auch an iD

- wir mappen ÖPNV-Linien derzeit nach diesem "Standard" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Proposed_features/Public_Transport&oldid=625726

VG Toni
Diacritic (2023-01-25 09:25:01+00:00): Hi icodethings,

Hi Wilburl,

Thanks for your contributions to SE Melbourne. :)

Unfortunately, the Nearmap does not have a compatible data license and cannot be used as a source for contributions into OpenStreetMap.

The Australian mapping community has compiled a list of compatible sources on the OSM wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Data_Sources.

Happy to answer any questions you have.

Dian
icodethings (2023-01-25 09:33:16+00:00): Hi Dian,

Understood! I didn't actually use imagery for this change-set, was other custom dataset I used from another app!

Is this okay?

Thanks,
Matt
Diacritic (2023-01-25 09:47:48+00:00): Hey Matt,

Thank you for your reply.

The URL used in your changeset source seems to have the nearmap url in it. What is the custom dataset/app you're using? It may have conditions of its own.

Dian
icodethings (2023-01-25 09:54:14+00:00): Hey Dian,

The dataset I was using was based off the Vicmap Planning/Property dataset. 

I forgot I had nearmap turned on to be honest! Will not use it in the future.

I can re-create this changeset with bing imagery if that's needed?

Thanks,
Matt
Diacritic (2023-01-25 10:28:30+00:00): No stress at all Matt.

The Vicmap Planning and Property datasets are covered by a waiver, and Bing Imagery is obviously usable.

I think the easiest resolution would be to go through your changeset and make sure that there is nothing there that is exclusively sourced from nearmap; if the fence line is visible in bing, for example, then that can be the source. :)
A67-A67 (2023-02-28 14:33:17+00:00): Hallo,
Waarom heb je aan de nachttrein tussen Schiphol en Maastricht het netwerk 'Vechtdallijnen' toegevoegd? Dat is een concessie in het oosten van Nederland. De Arriva-nachttreinen vallen buiten concessies.
NorthCrab (2023-01-25 10:19:46+00:00): Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Samo nadanie nazwy nie jest poprawnym sposobem oznaczenia POI, należy mu także przydzielić kategorię. Jakiego rodzaju POI jest to?

Pozdrawiam!
intexpc (2023-01-25 11:06:56+00:00): Chętnie dodał bym kategorie, jednak nie potrafię znaleźć miejsca gdzie mogę to zrobić. A co do rodzaju POI, jest to sklep komputerowy, niedawno wybudowany budynek z nowo przydzielonym adresem.
NorthCrab (2023-01-25 11:12:56+00:00): Okej uzupełnione, wyszukałem "computer store". Nie wiem czy po Polsku nie nazywa się to jakoś inaczej. Pozdrawiam!
intexpc (2023-01-25 11:34:45+00:00): Ok, wielkie dzięki.
Dimacn (2023-01-25 11:26:52+00:00): Пожалуйста не добавляйте новые дороги поверх уже существующих, вы же их дублируете. Нужно просто редактировать те что есть, например, добавить название улицы.
SekeRob (2023-01-26 13:39:35+00:00): Hi,

Redone all your tagging except Keywords which does not, to my knowledge have an equivalent, maybe category but since it was used twice before, no alert, though proper all keywords are in small, so it would have been keywords.

ciao
hrhino (2023-01-26 14:52:43+00:00): Should description also be modified? It's truncated, for one, and I'd probably say it's ad copy.
SekeRob (2023-01-26 15:23:11+00:00): An edit I think that is for Tami to consider. Guess there is this 255 char restriction.
Allison P (2023-01-26 21:36:42+00:00): SEO editors never come back and never look at changeset comments. I haven't seen it happen once. They only ever come back to update the listing.
SekeRob (2023-01-27 10:56:28+00:00): Well aware of the poor responsiveness of the 1 CS mapper entries, but there's always hoping.
tux67 (2023-01-25 12:06:45+00:00): Prima, solange das wirklich der Fall ist (und das NRW DOP sieht so aus). Das Argument des sonst nicht funktionierenden Routings wäre nämlich keines: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Taggen_f%C3%BCr_den_Renderer
Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131687080
wkdgs (2023-01-31 11:08:24+00:00): Inwiefern hilft denn hier "bicycle=no" und "motor_vehicle=no" fürs Routing? Der "acces=private" Tag sollte ja eigentlich schon verhindern, dass man hier lang geroutet wird.

Wie ist denn die Beschilderung vor Ort? Es sollte nur das eingetragen werden, was auch tattsächlich dort steht.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131687225
_gerd_ (2023-01-31 13:00:02+00:00): Das Problem war dass es einen Pfad gab der teilweise privat ist und teilweise public. Das habe ich erst danach kapiert. In einem anderen changeset habe ich den Pfad dementsprechend geteilt und dann die Attribute entsprechend vergeben. Sorry war das erste Mal dass ich Änderungswünsche eingebe.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131687225
Britzz (2023-02-16 21:57:09+00:00): Je ne sais pas trop ce que vous avez tenté de faire mais ajouter un bâtiment en plein milieu de la rue n'est certainement pas une image fidèle de la réalité. Persévérez si OSM vous plaît mais alors soyez plus attentif dans vos éditions.
NB : je supprime votre ajout "Chicha Sorbonne"
unen (2023-01-25 10:14:44+00:00): Merhabalar, elinize sağlık. Yazım hatalarına da dikkat ederek düzenlemenizi hatırlatmak isterim. Mehmet Akitf olarak işlenmiş, ben Akif olarak düzeltiyorum.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131687622
mavl (2023-04-25 09:03:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
limes11 (2023-01-25 11:56:36+00:00): Hi,

das war schon korrekt, was hier allerdings fehlte, war der beschreibende Tag der Gesellschaft. Der "name" hier bezieht sich ja nicht auf das Gebäude selbst.

Ich habe office=research ergänzt.

Siehe

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:office=research?uselang=de

VG und viel Spaß mit OSM

Limes
NorthCrab (2023-01-25 10:39:09+00:00): Zmiana rodzaju budynku nie ma związku z oznaczeniem POI, w ciągłym czasie brakuje oznaczenia czy to jest np. sklep czy biuro. Dodatkowo wartość "Marek Piątkowski" brzmi jak operator a nie część nazwy dlatego została przeniesiona do wartości operator=.
NorthCrab (2023-01-25 10:42:07+00:00): Na oficjalnym logotypie nie widać aby ta część była częścią nazwy: https://i.imgur.com/3G54hAO.png A jeśli zależy Ci na oznaczaniu nazw tak jak jest "w papierach" to proszę umieść tą wartość w official_name. Chociaż ja osobiście uważam że ustawienie tutaj operator= jest o wiele "czystszym" rozwiązaniem.
Sklep925 (2023-01-25 11:15:32+00:00): Jest to sklep internetowy - czyli sprzedaż tylko przez internet, ale można podjechać coś odebrać.
Postarałem się poprawić, ale szczerze mówiąc nie wiem czy robię to poprawnie

925.pl Marek Piątkowski to pełna oficjalna nazwa - myślałem, że właśnie taka powinna być tutaj wprowadzona, ale jak najbardziej może być samo 925.pl
NorthCrab (2023-01-25 11:19:19+00:00): Rozumiem, z nazwami jest tak że nazwa główna to nazwa która stosowana jest na co dzień. Jeśli operator jest znany (jak w tym przypadku) to wtedy jest to umieszczone jako oddzielna wartość. Jeśli zdarza się że nazwa używana na co dzień różni się od oficjalnej, która też jest używana - tylko rzadziej. Wtedy ta wartość jest ustawiana jako official_name. W tym przypadku uważam jednak że official_name byłby zbędny ponieważ zawierałby on jedynie zduplikowane informacje z pozostałych pół (name + operator).
Sklep925 (2023-01-25 13:00:28+00:00): Rozumiem. Dziękuję za informację - postaram się na przyszłość lepiej uzupełniać dane
NorthCrab (2023-01-25 13:03:38+00:00): 👍️ Jakbyś miał jakieś pytania to możesz napisać u nas na forum albo discordzie. Więcej informacji na https://openstreetmap.org.pl/
mavl (2023-04-25 09:11:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
Max-Kritic (2023-01-30 09:00:23+00:00): Idem
eggie (2023-01-25 10:58:29+00:00): Dag Jordi Ik heb nog twee stukjes omgetagd naar de juiste straatnaam. 
Wanneer je zou omschakelen naar JOSM krijg je direct een waarschuwing dat de straatnamen verschillend zijn.
Die heeft een goede validator. 

editor josm stap voor stap 

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710        

MVG
eggie
DD1GJ (2023-01-26 22:28:54+00:00): Revert, accidentally uploaded test data. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131688820
DD1GJ (2023-01-26 22:27:20+00:00): Revert, accidentally uploaded test data. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131688820
DD1GJ (2023-01-26 22:25:55+00:00): Revert, accidentally uploaded test data. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131688820
DD1GJ (2023-01-26 22:24:57+00:00): Revert, accidentally uploaded test data. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131688820
DD1GJ (2023-01-26 22:24:00+00:00): Revert, accidentally uploaded test data. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131688820
DD1GJ (2023-01-26 22:22:20+00:00): Revert, accidentally uploaded test data. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131688820
DD1GJ (2023-01-26 22:18:37+00:00): Revert, accidentally uploaded test data. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131688820
DD1GJ (2023-01-26 22:16:56+00:00): Revert, accidentally uploaded test data. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131688820
DD1GJ (2023-01-26 22:15:18+00:00): Revert, accidentally uploaded test data. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131688820
DD1GJ (2023-01-26 22:13:32+00:00): Revert, accidentally uploaded test data. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131688820
DD1GJ (2023-01-26 20:37:03+00:00): Revert of a lousy and undiscussed import. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131688820
DD1GJ (2023-01-26 20:34:22+00:00): Revert of a lousy and undiscussed import. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131688820
DD1GJ (2023-01-26 20:31:11+00:00): Revertof a lousy and undiscussed import. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131688820
DD1GJ (2023-01-25 18:16:24+00:00): What is the intention of your edits today? What errors and warnings did you want to fix?
You have created a total mess. Therefore, your edits today will be deleted promptly. The OSM database is not the right place for such experiments!
Rooseler Gyimah (2023-01-26 20:36:40+00:00): Delete them asap .I got a warning it can’t be uploaded and I don’t know it was uploaded here .
DD1GJ (2023-01-26 23:00:00+00:00): Hello Rooseler,

I've reverted all the changesets you accidentally uploaded. I assume you are experimenting with artificial intelligence to recognise buildings on aerial photos. If you are planning to add data to OpenStreetMap in this way for the project of https://tu-empower-africa.org/, please consider the following recommendations:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines

https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17856687

Many greetings
Joachim
DressyPear4 (2023-02-06 22:07:54+00:00): Revertido! Se não há motivos não há porque deletar
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131689154
ovruni (2023-01-25 23:44:23+00:00): Hola mountaingeography, en este conjunto de cambios se ha cambiado etiquetas de dirección las cuales no parecen concordar con la calle y la ciudad donde se encuentra el objeto.
Saludos
user_369910 (2023-01-26 09:29:41+00:00): Gracias. Tomé la info de https://www.villavalenciahotel.com/contactenos.php. Parece que algo no concuerda.
ma-rt-in (2023-01-26 14:40:52+00:00): Hey,
deine Ergänzung zur barrier verstehe ich nicht. südlich hast du block ergänzt und auf den weg nur barrier=yes.

vg
G4rden3r (2023-01-26 15:00:20+00:00): Moin, 
ich hatte hier einen Hinweis mit Verweis auf ein nicht vorhandenes Gatter. Ich habe dann auf Mapillary folgendes gefunden ( https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=239485907520765&focus=photo&lat=53.5289183&lng=9.8436492999722&z=17 ), mir fiel aber nicht der richtige tag für diese Art Gatter ein, deswegen nur "yes"

vg
ma-rt-in (2023-01-26 15:15:40+00:00): Danke für die Aufklärung.
Glassman (2023-01-25 16:58:44+00:00): Where did you get your information to add the culvert and ford to the stream?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131690404
Kla_Ger (2023-01-26 10:19:11+00:00): I was a bit lazy on that point, you're right. Should be "too hard to see".
What do you suggest? Revert to the definitely wrong status as before or keep it as is, potentially wrong?
Glassman (2023-01-26 18:07:35+00:00): I would revert to the former status - which I conclude is unknown. There is Kartaview imagery but it was taken on a rainy day which makes finding detail difficult.
Matija Nalis (2025-03-11 14:41:28+00:00): Hi, I see you've set `bicycle=no` on many secondary roads where I do not see explicit signs prohibiting bicycles. In Croatia, bicycles are only implicitly disallowed on `highway=motorway` and "Brze ceste rezervirane za promet motornih vozila" (usually `highway=trunk`).   Everywhere else, bicycles are allowed (you may want to add `class:bicycle:non_experienced=-x` to indicate it's not a good idea even if lawful)

Also, if there is cycleway alongside a road, please use `bicycle=use_sidepath` instead of `bicycle=no`.
rskedgell (2024-05-08 17:59:20+00:00): It's not the official website of the bridge, as it does not have one. Removed.
habi (2023-06-21 09:35:52+00:00): Ciao AdeBaumann
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/366108257 heisst ziemlich sicher nicht 'Former School'.
Ich würde das Gebäude als `building=school` erfassen und eine allfällige neue Nutzung mit https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:use abdecken.
Wird das Gebäude jetzt als Wohnhaus genutzt?
Gruss,
habi
Qitay (2023-01-25 19:49:17+00:00): Are you sure about this? Check here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anambra_International_Cargo_Airport I don't see anything for Olkurruk Mara Airport
aleksaJov (2023-01-25 21:51:13+00:00): Hello Qitay,

According to IATA identifier, the ANA code refer to Maasai Mara national park area, Angama Mara safari lodge.
The Wikipedia article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angama_Mara_Airport
OSM link: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/884013049

Regards,
Aleksandar
Qitay (2023-01-25 22:35:02+00:00): Yeah, it seems wikipedia for the Anambra Airport is wrong, I don't see this airpoirt in IATA database, thanks
Qitay (2023-01-25 22:39:44+00:00): ICAO code is probably also wrong on this wikipedia page, hmm
ovruni (2023-01-25 23:53:19+00:00): Hola mountaingeography, en este conjunto de cambios se ha agregado el nombre "Departamento con vista" el cual no es un nombre sino una descripción.
Saludos
ovruni (2023-01-25 23:54:37+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres#Los_nombres_no_son_para_descripciones
user_369910 (2023-01-26 09:24:36+00:00): Gracias. El fuente es: https://www.booking.com/hotel/pe/departamento-con-vista-de-balcon.es.html
ovruni (2023-01-26 12:42:12+00:00): Hola, en OSM no podemos ir subiendo objetos de otras fuentes que no tengan licencia compatible con la de OSM, en la web se indica "Todos los derechos reservados", voy a revertir sus conjuntos de cambios. Si tiene alguna duda sobre el mapeo de OSM en Perú, puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe de la comunidad de OSM en Perú. 
Saludos
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-01-25 12:43:57+00:00): Proszę, przeczytaj https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian i zastosuj te porady
Supaplex030 (2023-01-26 08:30:41+00:00): Hallo momabebra,
ich lasse mal zwei Hinweise hier, die mir in deinen Changesets immer wieder auffallen:
- Querungsstellen von Gehwegen über Straßen solltest du zusätzlich mit einem "footway=crossing" ausstatten (so wie du korrekt "footway=sidewalk" an den Gehwegen selbst benutzt)
- Bitte vermeide unbedingt "natural=grassland" und nutze stattdessen "landuse=grass". "grassland" ist ein Tag für natürliche (unbewirtschaftete) Graslandvegetation/-landschaft und kommt so in der Stadt nicht wirklich vor!

lg, Alex
segubi (2023-03-20 06:43:22+00:00): @ ref-Tags der Ringe in Bünde: 1. eine echte Frage: gibt es eine allgemein anerkannte Regel, dass Sonderzeichen nicht in Tags auftauchen dürfen? Wenn ja, wo? (Denn exakt das ist die Referenz on the ground gewesen). 2. Kritik: Ein korrektes ref-Tag zu löschen ist nicht korrekt. In diesem Fall wäre ein Austausch mit 1/2/3 korrekt gewesen.
segubi (2023-03-20 06:54:40+00:00): War das aus JOSM? Der Satz über dem Validator "Versuchen Sie diese [Fehler und Warnungen] zu reparieren ohne gültige Daten zu beschädigen. Falls Unsicherheit besteht bitte die Ausgaben ignorieren." ist wichtig und gilt für alle Validator-Tools!!!
literan (2023-01-25 17:08:25+00:00): удалили тег без какого-либо объяснения. Верну обратно пока.
filbro (2025-01-02 21:52:18+00:00): Hi !MRGBoss, 
ich frage mich gerade ob es wirklich nötig ist, Erdgaspipelines zu mappen, noch dazu wenn es nur „interpolated/estimated“ ist. Woher stammen denn die Informationen über die Lage? Im östlichen Bereich scheinen sie ja noch etwas genauer zu sein, aber Richtung Westen erscheint mir das Ganze doch sehr beliebig. Was denkst du, brauchen wir das wirklich? 
Grüße, Filip
eggie (2023-01-25 12:21:41+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback   Alle begin is moeilijk. Dit is wat je uiteindelijk hebt gedaan. De wegen over de gebouwen getrokken. Even CTRL F5 een paar keer voor het effect.
Beter geen adresgegevens toevoegen aan gebouwomtrekken. Voeg bedrijven bij aan de adresnodes svp. 



MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-01-25 12:22:56+00:00): Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=131692127
eggie (2023-01-25 12:39:19+00:00): Beste test

Schade aan wegennet Stationsweg/ Menno van Coehoornstraat hersteld.
Schade aan 3D mapping  (indoorroom) hersteld. 
Building yes verwijderd.. 
Reclame in description verwijderd. 
Je info staat op een node...  

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-01-25 12:44:06+00:00): Dit is allemaal 3Dgemapt.. Dan niet aan zo'n gebouw veranderen.. Dan werkt het niet meer
https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=51.5954300&lon=4.7792260&zoom=18
Voorzichtig met de kaart. Check svp wat je hebt gedaan.
OSM is niet bedoeld als reclamebureau. 
MVG
eggie