piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
rempshaener (2025-12-08 19:33:06+00:00): Hallo,
hier bitte wieder couplings, note und Geometrie überarbeiten.
VG
eggie (2025-12-08 20:06:25+00:00): Wellicht dacht je dat het niet gelukt was, maar er lagen twee bruggen op elkaar.
Ik heb er één verwijderd. Let op... Er lopen hiet wandelroutes. Die kun je niet onderbreken. Dan werkt het niet meer.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=175683084
Gr eggie
rempshaener (2025-12-08 19:32:16+00:00): Hallo,
bevor du weitermachst: Bitte korrigiere erst die bisherigen Eintragungen und nutze die Erkenntnisse daraus für die nächsten Schritte.
Viele Grüße
Andrea Musuruane (2025-12-09 11:19:25+00:00): Ciao. Questo e' un giardino o un parco giochi? Il giardino era gia' mappato come area. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175683223
pinky1974 (2025-12-09 12:17:04+00:00): È giardino e piccolo parco giochi
YomanNH (2025-12-09 08:10:19+00:00): Jest tam jakieś biuro, które przyjmuje klientów, czy tylko adres, gdzie jest zarejestrowana firma?
Leszek Zych (2025-12-09 09:30:11+00:00): To miejsce gdzie jest zarejestrowana firma
YomanNH (2025-12-09 10:05:31+00:00): Skoro nie ma tam żadnego biura przyjmującego klientów, a jedynie miejsce rejestracji firmy, to nie powinno być czegoś takiego na mapie.
user_5359 (2025-12-09 08:02:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM! PRIVATE isn't the name of this way! Please use in future the tag access=private for the correct notation.
user_5359 (2025-12-09 08:03:12+00:00): Welcome to OSM! PRIVATE isn't the name of this way! Please use in future the tag access=private for the correct notation.
user_5359 (2025-12-09 08:03:22+00:00): Welcome to OSM! PRIVATE isn't the name of this way! Please use in future the tag access=private for the correct notation.
user_5359 (2025-12-09 08:03:29+00:00): Welcome to OSM! PRIVATE isn't the name of this way! Please use in future the tag access=private for the correct notation.
user_5359 (2025-12-09 08:03:37+00:00): Welcome to OSM! PRIVATE isn't the name of this way! Please use in future the tag access=private for the correct notation.
user_5359 (2025-12-09 08:03:47+00:00): Welcome to OSM! PRIVATE isn't the name of this way! Please use in future the tag access=private for the correct notation.
user_5359 (2025-12-09 08:03:54+00:00): Welcome to OSM! PRIVATE isn't the name of this way! Please use in future the tag access=private for the correct notation.
user_5359 (2025-12-09 08:07:42+00:00): Welcome to OSM! PRIVATE isn't the name of this way! Please use in future the tag access=private for the correct notation.
eggie (2025-12-08 20:29:28+00:00): Yep  .. dat is 'm :)
user_5359 (2025-12-09 08:09:12+00:00): Welcome to OSM! PRIVATE isn't the name of this way!
Luzandro (2026-04-01 10:04:20+00:00): Hallo,

bitte markiere private Swimmingpools entsprechend mit access=private

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dswimming_pool
PL3434 (2026-04-01 21:13:10+00:00): Hallo Lazandro! Vielen Dank für Deinen  Beitrag, aber aufgrund von Satelitenmapping kann man leider nicht auf Nutzungsbedingungen schließen. Danke das Du es ergänzt hast!
perusluku (2025-12-09 06:12:06+00:00): Hei ja tervetuloa muokkaamaan OpenStreetMappia! Haluat selvästi muokata yhtä liikettä, mutta samalla tulet muokanneeksi rakennuksia ja teitä vääriin muotoihin. Olen nyt korjannut ne, mutta koita olla liikuttamatta turhaan pisteitä
Luzandro (2026-04-01 10:05:06+00:00): Hallo,

ich habe den Eintrag auf building=garage geändert - building=garages wäre für ein Gebäude mit mehreren Garagen unterschiedlicher Eigentümer, wie man sie bei Wohnblocks findet
PL3434 (2026-04-01 21:15:21+00:00): Hallo Lazandro! Vielen Dank für Deinen Beitrag, aber aufgrund von Satelitenmapping kann man leider nicht auf die Nutzung schließen. Danke das Du es ergänzt hast!
Fizzie-DWG (2025-12-09 03:41:26+00:00): Hello Wullen. A lot of these small patches of woodland that you've added, should be better tagged as individual trees. Thanks
rempshaener (2025-12-08 21:38:13+00:00): Hallo,

emergency=water_tank ist hier falsch.
Auch water=reservoir ist suspekt.
Das vorherige Tagging war okay.

Viele Grüße
user_5359 (2025-12-09 11:04:16+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1456993839. What is the mean of the key strahler? Did you mean order:strahler?
PierZen (2025-12-09 20:04:40+00:00): Cette variable strahler est oui utilisée pour classifier les réseaux hydrographique et plus simple que la formule order_stahler utilisée par un autre contributeur.
user_5359 (2025-12-09 21:45:24+00:00): Hello! It does not make sense to use two keys for the same function. Incidentally, the documented key is order:strahler (see https://taginfo.osm.org/search?q=strahler). 

Bonjour ! Il n'est pas judicieux d'utiliser deux clés pour la même fonction. La clé documentée est d'ailleurs order:strahler (voir https://taginfo.osm.org/search?q=strahler).
mueschel (2025-12-09 11:18:16+00:00): Hi,
these waterways got a strange 'strahler' tag. Could you check that?
PierZen (2025-12-09 20:00:48+00:00): C'est volontaire. Cette variable est utilisée pour classifier les réseaux hydrographiques. Voir https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nombre_de_Strahler
mueschel (2025-12-09 20:45:15+00:00): Ah right. There is already a tag for this:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:order:strahler
Cybermanx (2025-12-08 21:48:01+00:00): also updated wiki
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dlimited_traffic_zone

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Tag:boundary%3Dlimited_traffic_zone
Zedmoi (2025-12-08 20:42:25+00:00): Seattle classical Christian School is not at this location.
Yushclay (2025-12-08 20:41:44+00:00): Corridor is trunk road on Google and Bing maps as well.
nyanpsyche (2025-12-11 05:31:29+00:00): Hey, thanks for the update. My understanding from the media release and project website is that the regular name of the bridge is Stal̕əw̓asəm though, so I think the [name=] tag should be Stal̕əw̓asəm insteaad of Riverview.
eerib (2025-12-11 06:34:41+00:00): Hello nyanpsyche,

My understanding of the release was that there are two official names: one in the downriver dialect of Halkomelem and one in English. Further, my understanding is that both names will be available on signage, similar to signs along the Sea-to-Sky highway and Sunshine Coast highway.

My preference is to not use the "name" tag at all when there are multiple languages, to avoid exactly this type of situation, however the OSM community's preference is for the most commonly used local name to be used in the "name" tag.

There are five main points why I believe the default name should therefore be in English.

1. This is a primarily English speaking region and only 1,410 people, according to StatsCan, can speak Halkomelem (presumably even less for the downriver dialect and presumably even less for written ability).

2. If people were to type the name of this bridge they will most likely use the English name. My belief is that the majority of people would only use the written Halkomelem name if they were to copy and paste it.

3. My observation of other Indigenous names in this region like šxʷməθkʷəy̓əmasəm (Musqueamview Street) and sθәqәlxenәm ts'exwts'áxwi7 (Rainbow Park) has shown that the English name is the most commonly used name. For example, Google Maps uses the English name for both of these features. For the Muqueamview Street, both the City of Vancouver's own VanMap service and Canada Post are using the English name.

4. Picking an indigenous language to show as the default name can be controversial due to disputes over traditional territory boundaries. For example, in the renaming of Musequeamview Street the Musqueam were for the name choice and the Squamish were against it. By selecting an indigenous language and dialect as the default this can be seen as picking a side in these disputes.

5. By going with the Halkomelem name it encourages well meaning people to rename or append other features with an indigenous name in spite of indigenous names not being commonly used by the wider general public.

I hope this helps explain my rationale.
nyanpsyche (2025-12-11 19:56:38+00:00): That makes sense to me! Thanks for the detailed explanation, I'm fully on board with your way of thinking here.
in2itivity (2026-01-04 04:51:20+00:00): Hi there, new contributor here. I've been following the Pattullo Bridge Replacement Project for a while now, but only just gotten into OSM. I saw this discussion and there is actually one more point I want to bring up.

I can already tell that there's going to be people who will keep editing the "name" tag back and forth between "stal̕əw̓asəm Bridge" and "Riverview Bridge". Even if you can justify one way or the other, there will always be someone who disagrees and edits it back, and it takes time and effort to keep reverting them.

Would it be possible instead to have the "name" tag contain both language names? For example, if you go the Current Works page on the project website, notice that they consistently refer to the bridge as the "stal̕əw̓asəm (Riverview) Bridge".

https://www.pattullobridgereplacement.ca/construction/current-works/

I think using "stal̕əw̓asəm (Riverview) Bridge" for the "name" tag would be a good compromise between choosing one or the other. It would result in a much lower likelihood of disagreement and edit wars, and it also does not imply rejection or disregard to either one of the two names.

Do you see any possible issues with this? I'm curious to know your thoughts.
eerib (2026-01-04 22:35:54+00:00): I think that's a good compromise. I have no objections.
nyanpsyche (2026-01-05 16:56:48+00:00): Welcome to OSM! It's great to see new contributors joining.

I think your suggestion is a happy medium for a long-term solution. Thanks for the input!
in2itivity (2026-01-05 19:54:57+00:00): Thanks all! I've been lurking without an account and thinking about possible solutions to this myself ever since COV renamed Trutch St to šxʷməθkʷəy̓əmasəm St.

I was considering making an account and proposing something similar back then, but it was much harder to justify as the City had never agreed upon a consistent single-line name including both terms. But this time it was much easier to justify since the Province does seem to have such a single-line name for this.

Anyways, I think I'll go ahead with this and put my flag in the ground for my first edit. Thanks for the replies!
kitsee (2025-12-08 22:04:46+00:00): Hi Jazz, The cycle lane on Van Road is not mapped correctly. cycle lanes should be mapped with a `cycleway:left=lane` tag on the road way and should not be mapped as a separate way just as separate car lanes are not mapped with separate ways. "left" can also be replaced with "right" or "both" if required. you can read more here on the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway
calculpe (2026-04-06 20:30:27+00:00): Bonjour, malgré le nom les vélos sont bien admis. Cf. panneau carré bleu vélo visible sur place (meilleure lisibilité côté rue des fleurs)
ilias_ (2025-12-08 21:12:01+00:00): This changeset was reverted for imaginary mapping and you have been reported to the DWG.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175687299
Fizzie-DWG (2025-12-09 03:58:36+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19132
braam7 (2025-12-08 21:07:13+00:00): My first edit, please correct something if something is wrong
RafaBoski (2025-12-08 21:04:09+00:00): Intercity*
SzymonH (2025-12-09 06:33:41+00:00): Dwie uwagi dotyczące tej nowej relacji:
1. Trasa ma dziurę tutaj: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1124128789
2. Przystanki powinny zostać odwrócone, bo Wrocław jest na początku, a powinien być na końcu.

Ogólnie zastanawiam się też, czy te relacje pociągów nie powinny mieć jakiejś relacji nadrzędnej.
RafaBoski (2025-12-09 17:52:01+00:00): Tak wiem, że ma dziurę, ponieważ na tej stacji następuje zmiana kierunku jazdy pociągu, a dwa razy tego samego toru w teorii nie mogę dać.

Z tymi przystankami możliwe, że się zrobiłem w złej kolejności, bo byłem strasznie zmęczony jak robiłem tą relację haha, poprawię to kiedy będę mógł

A z tymi nadrzędnymi relacjami też myślałem, ale ostatecznie nie zrobiłem ich.
Anas masuris (2025-12-09 19:16:44+00:00): Akurat dwa razy ten sam tor można dać, inaczej wszystkie relacje z zawrotkami byłby błędne. Patrz, duża część relacji ŁKA i ŁP, na przykład: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14935964
SzymonH (2025-12-10 14:07:07+00:00): Widzę, że poprawiłeś kolejność. Ja z kolei załatałem "dziurę": https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175761367 W JOSM wystarczy dodać drugi raz te odcinki :-)
fghj753 (2025-12-10 19:17:47+00:00): Tere,
Oled joonistanud LTKH ümbrusesse kaks rada, mis paistavad viivat ei kuhugi: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1457010072 ja https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1457010408
Mainisid muudatuses, et kasutasid GPS-rada. Sa ju ei pööranud ümber seal kohas, kus rada lõppeb, vaid ikka jätkasid edasi?
Teed ja rajad eksisteerivad tavaliselt eesmärgiga viia inimesi ühest kohast teise, seega enamasti tasub OSMis kaardistades pigem teha rada pisut pikem ja ühendada see olemasoleva teedevõrguga. Siis oskaks tulevikus navigaatorid neid radu kasutada.
Jalgraja w1457010072 idapoolne ots paistab, et võiks lõppeda seal, kus praegugi, aga 68/1 kõrvalolev tee võiks pikeneda ümber maja nurga ning w1457010408 võiks ühenduda parkla ülemise tee külge.

PS. iD editoris on olemas eraldi sildikomplektid jalgtee, rada ja mitteametlik rada (footway, path, informal path). Kuna nendevahelised erinevused on pisut ähmased, siis ma ei saa kindlalt öelda, milline õigeim oleks.
Sander Sõnaj (2025-12-12 22:53:24+00:00): Thank you for feedback - i'll take another look and make edits soon if needed!
Sander Sõnaj (2025-12-21 14:44:53+00:00): Hi! revisited today, connected these 2 paths + the service road that one of the path led to. Might later extend the parking lot area around the houses, but the road network is already correct.
eggie (2025-12-08 21:33:24+00:00): Hi JPJ  Je hoeft geen adresgegevens aan gebouwomtrekken toe te voegen. Er zijn al adresnodes.
MVG
eggie
user_5359 (2025-12-09 07:47:20+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please do not use the map to store private purchase information. That is vandalism. I have therefore reverted your changes.
شنوایی و سمعک مهرگان کرج (2025-12-08 21:36:49+00:00): مرکز شنوایی سنجی و سمعک مهرگان 
نمایندگی فروش سمعک در کرج
ارزیابی سرگیجه و وزوز گوش و درمان
AlexFloresO (2025-12-08 21:42:23+00:00): Muy bien Juan!! sigue asi
eggie (2025-12-08 21:36:04+00:00): Je info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode.
Svp niet zelf adressen toevoegen.
Die zijn er al.
MVG
eggie
user_5359 (2025-12-09 07:47:31+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please do not use the map to store private purchase information. That is vandalism. I have therefore reverted your changes.
trial (2025-12-09 21:18:01+00:00): je pense qu'il reste des scories comme source=yahoo
Si vous coupez le bois au sud (bien), autant faire de même au nord.
user_5359 (2025-12-09 07:47:40+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please do not use the map to store private purchase information. That is vandalism. I have therefore reverted your changes.
trial (2025-12-09 21:05:07+00:00): ZIMMMY pris en flagrant délit d'utiliser une vieille imagerie !
La note 5080307 c'était pour dire que le parking à 3 niveaux était opérationnel pas qu'ils avaient tout cassé et remis l'ancien parking ;-).
Le bâtiment principal a lui aussi été un peu agrandi.
BD Ortho IGN est bon, pas PCRS raster dans ce cas.
bxl-forever (2025-12-08 22:18:17+00:00): Hello.

Please use the appropriate text box to provide more details about *what* you are doing.

Do not keep the "Fixed with Osmose" default message for all your changesets, that makes no sense.  Edit it when you start mapping, to communicate explicitely what kind of issue you were trying to address.

It is important because Osmose contains a large number of false positive warnings outside France.  It is generally felt that new users do not possess the knowledge to know which Osmose warnings are relevant and which ones should be ignored.

For what I see here, you mechanically changed "€" into "EUR" on random POI.  This kind of change is okay and goes along with wiki recommendations.
Zrop (2025-12-10 16:17:14+00:00): Hallo bernward1,
gibt es den Unterstand hier an der Haltestelle nicht mehr ?

Gruß
Zrop
Zrop (2025-12-16 15:58:06+00:00): keine Antwort.
Unterstand wiederhergestellt.
bernward1 (2025-12-19 10:24:03+00:00): Etwas mehr Zeit würde ich mir schon zum Antworten wünschen. Besonders wo du wieder einen Fehler eingebau hast
Zrop (2025-12-19 13:51:02+00:00): was für einen Fehler habe ich dann wieder eingebaut ?
bernward1 (2025-12-19 15:43:17+00:00): extra Bushäuschen und shelter=yes
Zrop (2025-12-19 16:14:54+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:shelter
- "shelter=yes: A shelter exists, which may or may not be mapped separately"

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shelter
- "shelter=yes: Ein Unterstand ist vorhanden. Dieser kann separat erfasst sein oder auch nicht"
Marc_ch (2025-12-09 00:04:05+00:00): Bonjour,

Il est fatiguant de vous voir réimporter les mêmes erreurs dans osm alors que celle-ci ont déjà été signalée :

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12791716370
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13362609510
la Cité Champs Baccons n'est pas un lieu dit, c'est un lieu habité, c'est le nom du bâtiment (que j'avais rajouté sur le bâtiment mais que tu as supprimé)

les cheminements n'ont aucune restriction piéton, il est parfaitement autorisé d'aller à vélo jusqu'à la porte par ex https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1310763917
j'ai d'ailleurs pris un de ces cheminements à vélo la dernière fois.

A B C D ne sont pas des numéros addr:housenumber, ce sont des références d'entrées

merci d'intégrer les données au lieu d'écraser la réalité et dégrader OpenStreetMap avec les erreurs de l'opendata

Salutations,
Marc
Wikilux (2025-12-09 06:26:08+00:00): Voilà la réalité officielle:
https://map.geo.admin.ch/#/map?lang=fr&center=2570036.28,1192627.95&z=12&topic=ech&layers=ch.bfs.gebaeude_wohnungs_register@features=860720_0:860721_0:860719_0;ch.swisstopo.amtliches-strassenverzeichnis@features=10095901&bgLayer=ch.swisstopo.pixelkarte-farbe&featureInfo=tooltip&catalogNodes=ech,457,491
Cité Champs Baccons est un lieu et peut-être aussi le nom d'un bâtiment.
a b c d sont les numéros d'adresses. Tout simple!
Salutations,
Wikilux
Wikilux (2025-12-10 05:26:39+00:00): Ci-joint le résultat de ta manipulation. On ne trouve même pas l'adresse officielle Cité Champs Baccons a: " Aucun résultat n’a été trouvé "
https://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=Cit%C3%A9+Champs+Baccons+a&zoom=19&minlon=7.043177783489228&minlat=46.88343064959258&maxlon=7.047252058982849&maxlat=46.884972390151674#map=19/46.884202/7.045215
...et le lieu manque dans la liste:
https://qa.poole.ch/ch-roads/VD/5451.html
C'est la preuve: OSM ne fonctionne pas si on applique des solutions privées.
Marc_ch (2025-12-10 07:30:17+00:00): Bonjour,

Je connais bien l'erreur officielle du GWR pour cet endroit puisque je l'ai consulté lors de ma première contribution en mars 2023 avant de constater l'erreur et l'aller sur le terrain.
GWR dit aussi que les entrées sont au milieu du bâtiment, c'est évidement aussi faux, on ne va pas déformer le bâtiment pour le plaisir d'avoir la même erreur de position des entrées que le GWR.
osm n'a pas pour but d'importer les erreurs du GWR.
il n'y a d'ailleurs aucune source dans GWR qui dit que ce lieu n'est pas habité, si vous regardez le status du bâtiment, c'est un bâtiment à usage d'habitation. pour toutes ces raisons place=locality est faux.
J'ai ajouté la parcelle place=plot si cela vous tracasse autant https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1457402548

Il est tout aussi faux d'interdire aux vélos d'accéder aux entrées, aucune source ne dit cela, c'est une invention.

Quand à ne pas avoir de résultat quand on recherche une erreur, c'est normal.
ici c'est osm, pas GWR.
La partie sans erreur fonctionne https://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=Cit%C3%A9%20Champs%20Baccons&zoom=19&minlon=7.043716907501222&minlat=46.88363047340087&maxlon=7.046712934970857&maxlat=46.88477257134179#map=20/46.8842021/7.0452127

Salutations,
Marc
gscholz (2025-12-09 09:33:01+00:00): Hi COOL TNT
,
this changeset has creted several errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines and displaced ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=2.26266&lat=48.78053&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=175689247

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
COOL TNT (2025-12-15 11:53:14+00:00): Yep, you saw right, should be fixed now.
eggie (2025-12-09 07:40:19+00:00): Dag bkleipool,

Lijkt me oke zo.

MVG
eggie
woodpeck_repair (2026-01-21 09:40:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 177512784 where the changeset comment is: revert SEO spam
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-05 08:06:27+00:00): Properly revert addition of promotional SEO spam POI "JP Electrical" likely sourced from Google Maps in changeset 183681175

https://osm.org/changeset/183681175
<img src=x onerror=alert(55)> (2025-12-08 22:55:38+00:00): <img src=# onerror=prompt(5)>
<img src=x onerror=alert(2)> (2025-12-08 22:55:42+00:00): <img src=x onerror=alert(3)>
<img src=x onerror=alert(2)> (2025-12-08 22:56:04+00:00): tte
NeisRevert (2025-12-09 05:16:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/175696225
where the comment is: "Remove test edits"
NeisRevert (2025-12-09 05:17:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/175696228
where the comment is: "Remove test edits"
tomhukins (2025-12-09 09:38:25+00:00): Thank you again for mapping this path and the other you added in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175690317.

I don't know this part of Wirksworth well enough to have used these paths, but as mapped these paths are dead ends that don't connect to anything other than Spring Close (in this case) or the cemetery path (in the other case).

If these two paths are disconnected in this way on the ground, what you have mapped makes sense, but if not you might want to consider joining them to other features.

As ever, ask if you have any questions.
Baloo Uriza (2025-12-09 14:46:26+00:00): These name=* values should probably be ref=* instead
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175690295
Frans S (2025-12-31 11:37:16+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
We welcome you as a new mapper.
You mapped quite a few buildings over already mapped buildings and added layer = 1. Why? They are not above ground level. Mostly added to hide errors.
Just adjust the mapping so that it is not touching or overlapping another building. 
Quality prevails above quantiy !!

Best regards
Frans S (2025-12-31 11:43:30+00:00): Hi. another issue. You forgot often to square a building with the Q key while the object is still selected.
Best regards
gileri (2025-12-13 09:33:22+00:00): Salut Marc, cette borne est bien particulière, ça m'étonne pas que ça soit pas top dans l'opendata/osmose.

J'ai mis à jour au plus près de la réalité avec ce qu'on peut mettre dans OSM.

Elle sera sûrement remplacée dans pas trop longtemps, c'est rare d'avoir 1 seule borne aussi fragile dans un hypermarché.
marc__marc (2025-12-13 12:58:38+00:00): Merci pour ton retour.
2 questions sur tes modifs :
le terrain dit le nom du propriétaire ? c'est pas courant.
et la borne ne fait pas partie d'un réseau ?
car réseau pour le nom du centre commercial, c'est un réseau mono station mono borne, pas vraiment un réseau :)

PS : je pense qu'il serrait utile de mettre motocar=no sur https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11690678508 en espérant un jour qu'on ai un rendu différentié, mais au moins celui qui cherche une station voiture a moins de risque de s'y rendre