piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
traveleditor (2025-02-10 18:42:40+00:00): GPX tracks for the placement of the Penchala Link roads, and approximate tunnel location based on the distance between the two roads right before the start of the tunnel in each direction. The location might be off by a little but it should be fairly accurate.
angys (2025-02-10 18:50:58+00:00): Alright because normally the GPS cannot be recorded when in tunnel
gscholz (2025-02-14 07:55:18+00:00): Hi KORAYREİS,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=28.82477&lat=40.52003&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=162362600

As you may know, this kind o f errors irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps.
Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
NorthCrab_upload (2025-02-10 18:30:47+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9566297303
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/970387058

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-30 07:17:09+00:00): reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173960368
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-30 07:20:05+00:00): reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answered

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173960456
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-08 01:50:26+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164657611
ion_chi (2025-03-03 13:58:44+00:00): The Wiki says "The main difference from areas tagged as tourism=hotel is that resorts sell their recreation services, with housing as an additional service, but a hotels sells its housing services and recreation is just an additional service." Poplar Haus is primarily a lodging provider, so I think tourism=hotel is correct. leisure=resort is also not rendered
ion_chi (2025-03-03 13:54:39+00:00): "Cabin" is part of the name used by the property (https://www.rockwoodbwca.com/map/) and why was www removed from the URLs?
KarlaIbrahić (2025-02-11 09:36:37+00:00): Reverted because node was created. #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162382679
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-05-30 23:41:39+00:00): Cleaned up SEO spam name and added relevant part to description=* instead in changeset 183421767

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183421767
varnish-WIDELY-downy (2026-06-18 04:03:16+00:00): Is the sidewalk that used to run between Oak Street and W 15th Place removed now? Where the crosswalk crosses Oak Street across from Applebee's.
thopf (2025-02-10 21:27:10+00:00): Hallo!
Tolles Mapping! Kennst du auch die genaue Gleislage der Grazer Märchenbahn? Die müsste noch eingezeichnet werden. LG.
PPete2 (2025-02-10 23:51:34+00:00): Danke, ich bin in sehr gutem Kontakt mit den Museumsbetreibern von welchen ich auch die Grundkarte der Stollen erhalten habe. Ich habe sie bereits nach der Abgrenzung zur Märchenbahn gefragt die ja eigentlich eh ein Teil des gesamten Stollensystem ist. Ich werde sie dann noch getrennt eintragen
hatul (2026-01-13 20:15:45+00:00): שלום, חיברת שתי נקודות של אוכף המילניום שאחת היתה שלט ואחת תצפית. אם נכון למזג צריך לבדוק את כל התגיות כי כרגע יש בלגן. בינתיים ביטלתי.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177194659
NorthCrab_upload (2025-02-10 19:31:10+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12575249862
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12575249861
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12575249860
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12575249859
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12575249858
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12575249856
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12575249855
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12575249854
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12575249853
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12575249852
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12575249851
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12575249850
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12575249849
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12575249848
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12575249847
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12575249845
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12575249844
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12575249843
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12575249842
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12575249841
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12575249840
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12575249839
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12575249838
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12575249837
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/434000778
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/434000969
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/434001988
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/434000847
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/592868911
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/592868912
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/592868913
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/592868914
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/592868918
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/434000838
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1078202574
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1078202575
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1078202576
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1078202577
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1078202579
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/434000735
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/434000352
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/434000961
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/434000363
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/434001006
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/434001782
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/434000889
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/434000634
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/592868930
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/434000383

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
karololszacki (2025-02-10 22:03:21+00:00): Thx @NorthCrab_upload - reverting it

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162369633
APneunzehn74 (2025-08-21 11:52:15+00:00): Hallo, ist diese Bank vielleicht eine Mitfahrbank wie hier im Wiki beschrieben?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dhitchhiking
Grüße APneunzehn74
redd (2025-08-30 10:09:58+00:00): Hi APneunzehn74,
bin mir nicht ganz sicher ob bei der Sitzbahnk das Sitzen oder das Mitfahren im Vordergrund steht.

Hast du das bereits selber geprueft? \

Habe gesehen dass du es bereits anpgeasst hast: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171017492

gruesse,

redd
APneunzehn74 (2025-08-30 11:28:44+00:00): Hallo redd, ehrlich gesagt hab ich die Bank nicht persönlich geprüft sondern mich auf den Namen bzw Beschreibung verlassen.
Hast du vielleicht ein Bild zu der Mitfahrbank? 
Es gibt tatsächlich Mitfahrbänke an denen man mit einstellbaren, bzw klappbaren Schilder den Fahrwunsch/Zielwunsch oder nur sitzen anzeigen kann.
Wenn jemand auf der Bank sitzt aber nicht mitfahren will halt der PKW ja im Prinzip umsonst an, ja nach Fall halte ich ein amenity=bench zusätzlich nicht unbedingt verkehrt.
Grüße APneunzehn74
NorthCrab_upload (2025-02-10 19:40:44+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9375772849
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/268396050

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Fizzie-DWG (2025-06-29 03:01:49+00:00): DWG revert - invalid deletion of names in different languages

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168248936
Dimitar155 (2025-02-10 21:04:33+00:00): Hi bouzinac,

I had previously moved these wikidata tags to the route master relations since they do not represent the individual directions of each line. Generally speaking each wikidata item should correspond to one OSM element (excluding brand:wikidata, operator:wikidata...), or at least this is how I understand it. Please correct me if I'm wrong.

Cheers,
Dimitar
bouzinac (2025-02-10 21:22:10+00:00): Hi, these wikidata id are used in some templates, such as in https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ligne_1_du_m%C3%A9tro_de_Sofia {notice there is still 2 and 4 missing, since there is a lag in the update process between OSM and wikipedia)
Frank Peng (2025-12-23 20:24:36+00:00): Hello iismitch 55, what was the point of reworking this mall? You deleted valid mall building geometries and redrew them from scratch. Please don't do that. It's against good practice on OSM. If you really want to "rework" buildings, then please just modify their geometry by adding or moving nodes on the building outlines or changing the building tags instead of deleting the buildings altogether and redrawing them from scratch. Please keep the history on OSM.

Per the "Keep the history" section of the OSM Wiki article on good practice, it states:
>"When things change in the real world, be bold, and edit the map to reflect the current situation. But be aware that OpenStreetMap can store the editing history of an element. You can help preserve this history by modifying the existing elements instead of deleting them and redrawing from scratch."
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history
Frank Peng (2026-01-06 10:13:41+00:00): Please see more of my comments in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162596452
nevw (2025-02-10 23:24:42+00:00): Hi, when mapping waterways, please map in the direction that the water is flowing, downhill toward the sea.
nevw (2025-02-10 23:30:45+00:00): I have remapped waterways here that were flowing upstream instead of downstream.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/-19.04462/46.32891
mcliquid (2025-02-11 19:08:28+00:00): Grüß dich! Ich habe hier den Grenzverlauf zwischen AT und LI wieder zurückgesetzt. Grund dafür ist ein recht neuer Grenzvertrag, der noch nicht in der basemap.at ersichtlich ist. Siehe dazu auch:
https://vorarlberg.orf.at/stories/3249769/

Ich hatte den neuen Grenzvertrag hier angepasst gehabt:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149218070

Und die Grenzänderungen jetzt hier zurück geändert, nicht das du dich wunderst:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162403673
hanzlan (2025-02-11 19:18:54+00:00): Servus! Oh, danke dir. Das ist mir tatsächlich entgangen. Danke für die Korrektur!
mcliquid (2025-02-11 19:21:29+00:00): Kein Problem! Wollte nur zuvorkommen, nicht das du denkst "Wer macht denn da meine Änderungen wieder rückgängig" :)
Frank Peng (2025-12-23 21:06:12+00:00): Hello iismitch 55, what was the point of reworking this mall? You deleted valid mall building geometries and redrew them from scratch. Please don't do that. It's against good practice on OSM. If you really want to "rework" buildings, then please just modify their geometry by adding or moving nodes on the building outlines or changing the building tags instead of deleting the buildings altogether and redrawing them from scratch. Please keep the history on OSM.

Per the "Keep the history" section of the OSM Wiki article on good practice, it states:
>"When things change in the real world, be bold, and edit the map to reflect the current situation. But be aware that OpenStreetMap can store the editing history of an element. You can help preserve this history by modifying the existing elements instead of deleting them and redrawing from scratch."
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history
Frank Peng (2026-01-06 10:13:26+00:00): Please see more of my comments in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162596452
Frank Peng (2025-12-23 21:06:38+00:00): Hello iismitch 55, what was the point of reworking this mall? You deleted valid mall building geometries and redrew them from scratch. Please don't do that. It's against good practice on OSM. If you really want to "rework" buildings, then please just modify their geometry by adding or moving nodes on the building outlines or changing the building tags instead of deleting the buildings altogether and redrawing them from scratch. Please keep the history on OSM.

Per the "Keep the history" section of the OSM Wiki article on good practice, it states:
>"When things change in the real world, be bold, and edit the map to reflect the current situation. But be aware that OpenStreetMap can store the editing history of an element. You can help preserve this history by modifying the existing elements instead of deleting them and redrawing from scratch."
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history
Frank Peng (2026-01-06 10:13:12+00:00): Please see more of my comments in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162596452
VLD549 (2025-02-18 17:42:39+00:00): Hi, I was asked to verify name changes. I can find Het Doctershoes, with a 'c' spelled, but it is just some meters south, along Bosstraatje 40, according to their site.
https://www.doctershoes.be/

Could you elaborate? I am not sure what to do. Thank you!
Eebie (2025-02-19 09:48:59+00:00): De schrijfwijze en toegangswegen tot B&B en fietscafé zijn aangepast.
VLD549 (2025-05-13 15:38:16+00:00): Thank you.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-02-10 20:21:38+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12576193645
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12576193624
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12576193621
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2755184665
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/135869026
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/260947583
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/260849998
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/260947382

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
user_21759646 (2025-02-11 23:33:47+00:00): Serio dodałeś adres na środku drogi i to zdublowany? Lepiej nie "ogarniaj" sieci adresów, bo chyba nie ogarniasz...
Barroszt (2025-02-19 15:54:45+00:00): Zdarza się każdemu... Lepiej zostaw te grubiańskie uwagi dla siebie...
Szacunku chociaż trochę!
kreuzschnabel (2025-02-24 21:49:05+00:00): Hi bootstrap999, in this edit you moved (by accident, I assume) a junction node by a few hundred yards to the southwest (see https://ibb.co/S7smq70z ). It has already been fixed a few days later, so no action needed, but please take care :)
berndw (2025-02-11 16:06:16+00:00): Ich werde den nicht offiziellen Parkplatz hier auf seine aktuelle Größe zurechtstutzen. Nur der Bereich an den Recyclingcontainern ist groß genug um Fahrzeuge abzustellen., Die auf den Mapillarybildern erkennbaren Wohnmoblie standen nur zeitweise dort.
Szymson (2025-02-17 19:21:56+00:00): W pierwszym momencie jak to zobaczyłem to pomyślałem, że to jakiś trolling, ale poszperałem w Internecie i faktycznie to się dzieje. Nie spodziewałem się takiej inwestycji w tym miejscu :P
czebureks (2025-02-17 22:39:31+00:00): No znalazłem informację o tym na forum SSC, ze zdjęciem terenu, więc uznałem, że wiarygodną. :) To bardziej Twoje rejony, więc jak będziesz w pobliżu, to możesz zweryfikować, czy dobrze zaznaczyłem teren - polegałem na numerze działki, która jednak zahacza też o te większe serwisówki.
mcliquid (2025-02-11 20:55:13+00:00): Hallo und guten Abend!
Ich habe, weil ich wirklich unwissend bezüglich des Tags das du entfernt hast bin, im deutschen OSM-Forum nachgefragt, ob deine Änderungen hier richtig waren. Ganz ohne böse Absichten und aus reinem konstruktivem Zweck. Mittlerweile ist eine kleine Diskussion dazu entstanden und ich würde mich freuen, wenn du dieser beiwohnen könntest, um deinen Sichtpunkt zu "access:both_ways" zu teilen.
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/grossflachiges-entfernen-von-access-both-ways-no/125665

Ich würde mich freuen - vielen Dank und einen schönen Abend!
joel56dt (2025-02-10 20:47:41+00:00): I'm interested - any info about this narrow gauge rail installed here? I'm interested why this was installed vs the standard gauge.

Thanks, Joel
ScottTheProtogen (2025-02-11 02:15:53+00:00): I've tried researching the narrow gauge tracks here, but have come up with nothing. 
My guess is that it's likely just a way to get poles moved from the building that makes/prepares them(?) by some sort of Logging Disconnect railcar - similar to ones used on old logging railroads, to an area where they can be put into a pile, then eventually brought to wherever they need to go by truck, or the standard gauge spur right next to the facility. 
The tracks are narrow gauge likely because it allows for sharper curves, but it would of probably been quite cheaper to simply make the tracks standard gauge, as there's an abundance of equipment, railcars, and locomotives in North America made for standard, compared to narrow.
joel56dt (2025-02-11 16:48:35+00:00): Thank you! Great information.

And thanks for adding this to the map.
berjk (2025-02-16 02:43:34+00:00): Hallo mcliquid: Bitte zufünftig solche Masten / Leitungen mit disused: oder besser mit removed: austragen. Denn in der Regel befinden sich solche Stromleitungen dann unter der Erde, was z.B. Infrastrukturkarten interessant ist. 
Danke!
mcliquid (2025-02-16 08:18:48+00:00): Hallo, das war mir nicht bewusst, dass "removed:" Leitungen noch in Karten angezeigt werden. Habe es korrigiert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162561250
ralley (2025-02-10 23:49:33+00:00): Why have you removed the highway tag from way 1214443204?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162367176
McNs (2025-02-11 01:28:55+00:00): Editing error - thanks for the catch - have reverted the highway tag
ralley (2025-02-11 04:58:25+00:00): Thanks for fixing.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162367176
John Kastner (2025-02-10 23:50:42+00:00): If this is under construction you should probably set `highway=construction` rather than `access=no`
PeteyDC (2025-02-10 23:56:46+00:00): edited! Good call.
felipeeugenio (2025-02-11 11:28:29+00:00): Hola.
Hay un pozo de agua en la plaza realmente? o es solo uno de esos aparatos para tomar agua?
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162367855
firestorm_gm (2025-02-22 18:19:47+00:00): hola, si en efecto es un pozo de tubos de concreto de aprox. 5 mts de profundidad
mcliquid (2025-02-11 19:00:10+00:00): What has changed since the last discussion? Neither of you has responded to my last comments. Since this seems to be turning into a war edit, may I ask you to clarify these changes in the Swiss Community Forum or on the mailing list? 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155647255
mcliquid (2025-02-14 21:12:30+00:00): Good evening, may I ask why communicating with you is so challenging?
vmicho (2025-02-16 09:31:38+00:00): Oh, hi. Looks like forgotten over xmas :|
mcliquid (2025-02-16 09:42:02+00:00): 👌
JanerNaKole (2025-02-10 21:39:12+00:00): dach budynku to nie jest jego obrys
JanerNaKole (2025-02-10 21:39:43+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
John Kastner (2025-02-10 23:47:57+00:00): Are you sure about this? These look like pretty standard alleys to me, and I'm not familiar with anywhere in DC that wouldn't allow biking down an alley
PeteyDC (2025-02-10 23:52:20+00:00): This set of alleys was marked different than all of the others in the city so I tweaked it. It shows up as a routing option for cycling apps. Is there a better option than “no” for cycling? Hopefully you get what I’m going for here.
goefra (2025-02-10 23:42:11+00:00): Die hier gezeigten 2 Gebäude existieren nicht mehr. Sie wurden abgerissen und 1 neues Gebäude gebaut.
mcliquid (2025-02-11 11:22:24+00:00): Na dann schau doch gerne nochmal über die neuesten Änderungen:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162386568

Was würdest du hier konkret noch anders erfassen?
Mevess (2025-02-11 13:08:43+00:00): revert dans 162390446
Nearby0051 (2025-02-14 15:54:49+00:00): Moin,
gibts nen Grund dafür, dass der Name nun wieder entfernt wurde?
eggie (2025-02-11 06:59:34+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback Wat doet een autokerkhof in een woonwijk. name=Ondergrondse containers AVRI ?
De naam heb ik aangepast naar description. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-02-11 07:05:53+00:00): Autokerkhof aangepast naar recycling
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:recycling_type%3Dcontainer

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-02-11 07:10:39+00:00): Nog een tip.. Geen paden vastplakken aan vlakken op de kaart. Dat maakt de kaart onwerkbaar voor medemappers.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=162368715

Mapse
eggie
Glassman (2025-02-11 17:40:02+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162368823
somehundred (2025-02-11 10:17:34+00:00): I merged the office node into the smaller building because it's unacceptable to add incorrect data like this. Add the node where the object actually exists on the ground, not wherever you want, to avoid creating confusion in people who navigate there.

And also, it is completely acceptable to have the name of the company added in "name" tag of the surrounding land use element. Why did you move it to operator?
signalv (2025-02-11 16:50:55+00:00): Thank you for the explanation! I agree with the argument that the physical truth should be represented.

Regarding the name/operator change: The area is handled by Rimi Baltic. However, realistically people would either look for the distribution center or the office building. This is why I removed the name on the larger area.
Would it make more sense to have all three with names "Rimi Baltic", "Rimi Baltic Office" and "Rimi Baltic Distribution Center" instead, to be more explicit and still include a top level name?

As for the incorrect point outside the building: My concern is that when navigating to the office, drivers are offered the service road, which is closer to the building. It should be used by vans and lorries picking up and dropping off goods. But general visitors should use the parking lot road to drive up to the building. Being offered the service road can cause a lot of confusion when first arriving at the east side service gate.
Is there a better way to tag that cars should arrive further away, and then walk by foot some 20 meters further?