piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2025-07-16 13:26:39+00:00): Hi Bonus iTINERIS, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Added name tag to a node, identifying it as Alto da Boavista (Celeirós)."

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish #AIgenerated
Eren00 (2025-07-16 18:46:02+00:00): Bu değişikliklerde, özellikle kullanıcının şu değişikliği: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169013492 yapımı devam eden otoyol güzergahı hakkında hatalı veri içermektedir. Gerçek güzergah daha kuzeyde yer almaktadır.

Resmî bilgilere EKAP üzerinden ulaşılabilir: https://ekap.kik.gov.tr/EKAP/Ortak/IhaleArama/index.html
İhale numarası: 2025/522552
28.04.2025 tarihli ilanda yer alan detaylar dosyasında bulunan "Kılavuz Planı.pdf" belgesi, otoyolun doğru konumunu göstermektedir.

Bu belgeye göre otoyol, Kümbet köyü civarından başlamaktadır: https://www.openstreetmap.org/search?lat=38.71746&lon=34.19681&zoom=16
Ancak söz konusu yapılan değişiklikte gösterilen güzergah yaklaşık 35 km daha güneyde yer almaktadır.

Kılavuz Planı'nın coğrafi referanslanmış hali OSM verisi üzerine yerleştirilmiştir: https://hizliresim.com/qyx3zk5 Bu nedenle bu değişiklik, aşağıdaki bağlantıda geriye alınmıştır:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169028364
NorthCrab_upload (2025-07-16 13:30:53+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4222544484
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1415169867

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Leo Slager (2025-07-16 22:49:09+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Leo Slager (2025-07-16 22:38:22+00:00): Thanks
NeisBot (2025-07-16 13:41:34+00:00): Hi Dell77, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 99% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 4 highway(s)
- 1 building(s)
- 1 landuse(')

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=169014227
user_22677083 (2025-07-17 18:09:27+00:00): They are indeed correct.   The dock has recently been filled in to make wat for the UK border force.   The marina pontoons. roads and buildings are no longer there.  big changes in Dover
pitscheplatsch (2025-07-18 04:10:58+00:00): 👍 Thank you for your reply and confirming that your deletions were intentional.

#HappyMapping
user_22677083 (2025-07-18 10:57:51+00:00): No problem.  Image of the huge works here if you like to see it

https://www.kentonline.co.uk/_media/img/KMXGYD7N8XN567JSQUUF.jpg
Leo Slager (2025-07-17 11:10:14+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
enzo_immergis (2026-03-27 11:05:10+00:00): Bonjour SeverineB,

Je ne trouve pas ce point d'eau sur les images de rues : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13004359594/history#map=19/43.477862/6.188114

Est-il toujours existant ?

Merci pour vos contributions.
Bonne journée,
Enzo
SeverineB (2026-03-31 15:14:48+00:00): Bonjour Enzo,
Il figurait sur la liste de la préfecture pour la prévention canicule.
Lors de mon repérage terrain le 5 juillet 2025, le point d'eau était bien présent et fonctionnait. 
Je vous accorde qu'il faut avoir l'œil !
On l'aperçoit notamment sur Google Street View 2023 entre le camion et les poubelles.
En espérant que cela puisse vous aider.
Cordialement,
enzo_immergis (2026-05-18 08:44:49+00:00): Merci pour votre retour. 
Il est effectivement bien caché :p 

L'idéal serait d'avoir des photos utilisables pour contribuer à OSM. Panoramax permet cela : https://panoramax.fr/

Bonne journée,
Enzo
Makeena (2025-07-16 13:56:47+00:00): All changed objects in Neuaffoltern except affected busline
ivanbranco (2025-07-24 21:01:44+00:00): Ciao Flavia,

di cosa si tratta? Ad ora c'è solo un nodo con nome "Punto Informativo Unificato". Non è chiaro cosa sia.
Flavia Gotta (2025-07-29 14:06:27+00:00): Ciao. Grazie per il riscontro; dovrei fare una mappa con 45 punti di facilitazione digitale a Torino, aperti all'interno di servizi o uffici già presenti. Come faccio?
Flavia Gotta (2025-07-29 14:07:09+00:00): Per il momento sono riuscita a metterci dentro solo il Punto Informativo Unificato e l'InformaGiovani
canfe (2025-07-29 14:32:57+00:00): Frattanto leggiti Flavia
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Relations/Relations_are_not_Categories
pertanto togli subito la relazione tra i punti.
Poi sposta i punti all'interno degli edifici, dato che, penso, non si trovino sulla strada.
Infine leggiti https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:office=government
per trovare cosa ahi in mente.
Nel caso i punti non venissero corretti, penso verranno rimossi da altri OSMers.
ONF Alençon (2026-06-04 09:25:39+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13004387628 appears to be a duplicate of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13004387629

Furthermore, the geolocation appears to be incorrect (in the middle of the street).

I have linked https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13004387629 to this observation on iNaturalist:
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/31606809
Sylvain M (2026-06-04 09:31:13+00:00): Sorry, I originally posted from my work account, but I’ve just made the change from my personal account.
I should add that I can only see one remarkable Ficus tree on Google Street View
ivanbranco (2026-06-04 09:57:38+00:00): According to the MASAF (italian Ministry of Agriculture, Food Sovereignty and Forests), they are two different trees: https://www.google.com/maps/d/u/0/viewer?mid=1tLHZ2paaloRnSssDTWUoP43nSJIhdBc&ll=37.31019201966755%2C13.585528114368145&z=19

I never saw duplicates in the MASAF database, the coordinates could be wrong tho (or the tree removed since last update). Are you sure there were no other monumental ficus nearby (lets say in a 10m radius)?
ivanbranco (2026-06-04 10:00:03+00:00): e.g. this one, on the other side of the road, seems pretty big, could be him: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1144803817699436&focus=photo&x=0.4752217478990721&y=0.3035157494208669&zoom=0&lat=37.310053904337&lng=13.585131080214&z=17
ivanbranco (2026-06-04 10:01:29+00:00): p.s. if you confirm the one you photographed has correct coordinates, we can remove "fixme=resurvey"
Sylvain M (2026-06-04 12:12:59+00:00): I didn’t take the photo myself, but it’s a well-geotagged iNaturalist observation that matches the various street photos available.
You’re right about the second one, south of Piazzale Aldo Moro: I’ve moved the trees to more precise locations based on the aerial photos, and removed the ‘fixme’.
Here is the changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183641841
ivanbranco (2025-07-24 21:02:50+00:00): Ciao Flavia, anche qua hai inserito un nodo col solo nome "Centro InformaGiovani". Non è chiaro cosa sia, mancano i tag descrittivi. Inoltre si trova in mezzo alla strada, qualunque cosa sia presumo si trovi all'interno di un edificio?
silversurfer83 (2025-07-16 14:46:16+00:00): Hello there :)

in this changeset you moved a node Romania and deleted a tag of a Interstate Highway relation in the USA.

Please explain why you did both of these things.

Also: Please read and apply what is written in this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

thank you
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169014995
user_5359 (2025-07-17 15:20:20+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1415175608. Which value is correct?
Motorcycle = Yes (should be motor_vehicle = yes)
motor_vehicle = no
?
NeisBot (2025-07-16 14:03:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-07-18 06:18:20+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/169090910
Udarian (2025-07-16 15:14:20+00:00): why did you remove dispensing=yes, the website indicates that you can get prescriptions here, I also do not see any issue with the healthcare and amenity tags.
user_22909869 (2025-07-16 16:05:20+00:00): It's the store that offers money transfer services, not the pharmacy.
user_22909869 (2025-07-16 16:06:18+00:00): I've added a bunch more tags
Udarian (2025-07-16 17:59:00+00:00): If you look at the website it has hours for pharmacy and "Rx in-store pickup" which tells you that it dispenses prescriptions, aka the need for the tag.
one_half_3544 (2025-09-13 16:23:39+00:00): Please don't add natural=peak to mountain passes, those are completely different entities.
Please don't disconnect natural=peak from the natural=ridge, the former are part of the latter (with some minor exceptions, of course)
Hufkratzer (2025-07-16 19:31:20+00:00): Hi,
this is not a good way to map a horse riding centre (Senante en Selle); it should be mapped once as a separate object (node or area), not different parts of it all as horse riding centres. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1415178940 is not a horse riding centre; it is a horse riding arena like  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1415158837 and should be tagged with leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/499726098 is also not a horse riding centre; it is just a small building which belongs to the horse riding centre; but since you have removed the tag building=yes it is no longer rendered as a building.
See also:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a#Riding_centre_(equestrian)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1126769842#map=19/48.815908/1.956528&layers=P (example)


Traduction automatique :

Hi,
ce n'est pas une bonne façon de cartographier un centre équestre (Senante en Selle) ; il devrait être cartographié une fois en tant qu'objet séparé (noeud ou zone), et non pas différentes parties en tant que centres équestres. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1415178940 n'est pas un centre équestre ; c'est un manège comme https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1415158837 et devrait être étiqueté avec leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/499726098 n'est pas non plus un centre équestre ; c'est juste un petit bâtiment qui appartient au centre équestre ; mais depuis que vous avez enlevé l'étiquette building=yes, il n'est plus cartographié en tant que bâtiment.
Voir aussi :
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a#Riding_centre_(équestre)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1126769842#map=19/48.815908/1.956528&layers=P (exemple)

Traduit avec DeepL.com (version gratuite)
user_22768934 (2025-07-17 03:58:25+00:00): bonjour merci pour vos conseils .je suis débutant et  vous pouvez corriger je ne me vexerais pas  belle journée à vous  
Hello, thank you https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Hufkratzer for your advice. I'm a beginner and you can correct me, I won't be offended.
Hufkratzer (2025-07-17 09:40:08+00:00): It is ok now. Thanks.
gscscnd (2025-07-17 04:12:30+00:00): addr:city:simc i addr:street:sym_ul też mają znaczenie, też należy je przenieść.
CurlingMan13 (2025-07-20 04:21:29+00:00): Reviewed.  Good edit!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169016218
SomeoneElse (2025-07-17 07:32:04+00:00): Hello,
Just wondered if the extra bit of NCN33 you can see at https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/76059#map=17/50.925816/-2.912251 is really still there, or is part of an old alignment?
Best Regards,
Andy
Simon Sustrans (2025-07-18 13:08:47+00:00): Hi Andy, another good spot! I thought I had removed that segment from the relation when I made the changes, but obviously not. Now removed. Simon P
SomeoneElse (2025-08-11 12:17:02+00:00): Thanks!
Udarian (2025-07-16 15:25:58+00:00): why did you remove dispensing=yes, the website indicates that you can get prescriptions here, I also do not see any issue with the healthcare and amenity tags.
user_22909869 (2025-07-16 16:11:40+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169015326
user_5359 (2025-07-16 18:40:44+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have deleted the entry because there is no verifiable information and there is no building near the point. This is identified as unwanted SPAM. For a better entry, please refer to the wiki https:/wiki.osm.org.
lorisobi (2025-07-16 15:16:23+00:00): sorry for the giant bounding box.

didn't notice the unsaved changes still in the editor that led to this :/
NeisBot (2025-07-16 14:48:47+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-07-18 06:17:45+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/169029687
aduxas (2026-05-01 14:12:57+00:00): That trail is actually in somebody's private yard: https://cumberlandri.mapgeo.io/datasets/properties?abuttersDistance=120&latlng=42.001132%2C-71.410995&previewId=059-0044-000&zoom=18
aduxas (2026-05-01 14:15:19+00:00): Did you check this out on site?  I did, and was unable to locate this trail.
Leo Slager (2025-07-17 11:11:25+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
user_5359 (2025-07-17 15:24:27+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/13004535874. What is the mean of the tags 
odłącznik = ŁOPW 6873
reklozer = ŁOPW 6872
?
TranslatorPS (2025-07-17 17:06:35+00:00): I've cleaned it up in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169071505 .
mcliquid (2025-07-16 19:08:55+00:00): Bekomme ich noch eine Antwort?
StC (2025-07-18 08:23:53+00:00): Ici aussi, un peu de casse. Je tente la réparation
MihaelIvanjek (2025-07-17 09:42:29+00:00): Reverting an accidental node creation #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169052017
rempshaener (2025-07-16 17:17:00+00:00): Hallo,
insbesondere zum "Norfbachweg", da bin ich gestern noch entlang gefahren: was ist denn die Quelle des Namens? Schilder stehen da keine, TIM-online weiß auch nichts...?
Viele Grüße
cronoser (2026-03-13 10:41:49+00:00): corregidas etiquetas
silversurfer83 (2025-07-16 18:22:13+00:00): moin rolfdieter,

den Wert "access=no" (im Editor auch als "Zugang erlaubt -> alle=nein" zu sehen), setzen wir nur, wenn es verboten dort entlang zu gehen/fahren/...
Dass dieser Weg nicht passierbar ist, ist schon mit "smoothness=impassable" hinterlegt. Wenn du glaubst, dass dieser Weg auch in der Vegetationspause nicht passierbar sein wird, dann kann der Weg von "highway=track" zu "abandoned:highway=track" geändert werden. 

Ein Feld-/Waldweg (highway=track) bleibt so lange ein solcher Weg, wie er prinzipiell für zweispurige Fz. geeignet ist. Dies können spezielle Forstfz sein, die auch sehr schlechte Wege nutzen können. Aber es bleibt ein highway=track.
Pfad (highway=path) nutzen wir bei Wegen, die nicht für zweispurige Fz vorgesehen sind.

Bei Fragen immer raus damit
cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169019934
user_5359 (2025-07-16 18:32:37+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You have entered a church with a service at 10:00 in the morning. As you have not entered a day, the service is every day of the week. If the service is only on Sunday, an abbreviation ‘Su’ is missing before the time. By the way, we wrote times in 24-hour notation, so an AM is not necessary. 
If yoe need help: You are welcome!
Sanniu (2025-09-30 13:30:30+00:00): Hi, way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1415197538 does not have tags. Can you add appropriate tags?
staker (2025-10-04 09:26:32+00:00): Done
Sanniu (2025-10-05 05:04:35+00:00): Thanks!
silversurfer83 (2025-07-16 18:33:51+00:00): Hi :)

falls du zufällig in der Nähe dieser Straße bist
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/793487558
hätte ich eine Frage:
Wie genau ist die Beschilderung jeweils von Osten und von Westen?

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169020592
Niederpruem (2025-07-20 05:51:00+00:00): Jetzt bin ich aus dem Urlaub zurück, aber bei Google Maps Street View kannst Du sehen: 
Unten bei der Kreuzung PA73 / Aunham rauf zur Haus-Nr. 14 steht das Schild "Privatweg Durchfahrt verboten!"
Oben an der Kreuzung Kurallee / Aunham runter zur Haus-Nr. 15 kannst Du noch ca. 100 m mit dem Auto in die Straße reinfahren, da links ein Parkplatz ist. Aber nach diesen 100 m ist auch das Schild "Privatweg Durchfahrt verboten!"
silversurfer83 (2025-07-20 06:54:49+00:00): Hoffe du hattest einen schönen Urlaub.

Dass wir Produkte der Firma Google nicht für unsere Arbeit verwenden dürfen hatte ich dir schon einmal erklärt. Dein wiederholtes Hinweisen auf Google Street View wirft deine Änderungen allgemein in Zweifel.

Ich hatte daher explizit nach Wissen, welches persönlich vor Ort erworben wurde, gefragt.

Bitte lies noch einmal den Abschnitt über Google auf dieser Seite:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:FAQ
Lokai (2025-07-20 11:10:54+00:00): Obacht mit den Hinweisen auf diese Firma, bei Zweifeln an der oder den Datenquellen besteht die "Gefahr", dass einer oder auch mehrere CS zurück gesetzt werden müssen.
Niederpruem (2025-07-27 00:49:32+00:00): Im Urlaub bin ich persönlich vor Ort gewesen. Mir ist die Straße Aunham aufgefallen, weil TomTom mich fälschlicherweise durch diese Straße fahren lassen wollte.
Der Hinweis auf Google Street View sollte einfach nur für EUCH ein "Beweis" sein, das es auch wirklich eine Privatstraße ist. 
Also bitte keine Panik, ich bin persönlich in Bad Griebach Therme vor Ort gewesen, sonst wäre ich bestimmt nicht auf diese Straße gestoßen.
silversurfer83 (2025-07-27 07:31:21+00:00): Danke für die Antwort.

Deine Änderungen in dieser Gegend sahen auch danach aus, dass du vor Ort warst. Dann passt das.

Auch die access Werte können erstmal so stehen bleiben, denke ich. Ist zwar nicht perfekt, aber nah genug dran ;)

happy mapping
Biff (2025-07-16 15:45:13+00:00): Hups, zu schnell geklickert. Eigentlich habe ich Haltestelle des Netliners nachgetragen. Dies sind echte Haltestellen mit grün-gelbem H-Schild, keine virtuellen Haltestellen.
literan (2025-07-16 19:54:06+00:00): зачем дубли вносите?
DanhengOSM (2025-07-23 00:46:17+00:00): 过于广大的范围，能否分批提交set
NeisBot (2025-07-16 15:54:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-07-18 06:17:14+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/169090885
silversurfer83 (2025-07-16 18:23:41+00:00): Hi :)

warum hast du denn beim Gebäude, in dem der Rossmann ist (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/190627552) alle Werte außer dem Gebäudetyp entfernt?
(building:levels	3
roof:levels	2
roof:shape	gabled)

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169020883
Lenkradfreek (2025-07-16 18:39:50+00:00): Ich war irgendwie der Meinung, dass die Eigenschaften von vor dem Neubau des Hauses stammten.

Habe nochmal nachgeschaut und die waren tatsächlich neu, hab sie wieder hinzugefügt.

Danke für den Hinweis
silversurfer83 (2025-07-16 19:11:12+00:00): Danke für die schnelle Reaktion :)

Happy mapping
rempshaener (2025-07-16 17:22:53+00:00): Das disused passt nicht, die Wege sind ja noch da. Ich habe es angepasst.
Znaika (2025-07-16 17:52:50+00:00): Ok. Ich denke, da wird man aber alles ausreißen, auch Asphalt
rempshaener (2025-07-16 18:03:08+00:00): Denke ich auch, bis dahin wäre es nur schön, das noch als Detail zu haben.
VG
NeisBot (2025-07-16 17:16:49+00:00): Hi mrkbsh, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Added contact phone number to an existing node."

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment #NoComment #AIgenerated
mappinglander (2025-08-12 22:55:15+00:00): Acil durum hastanesi.
erkinalp (2025-08-13 06:49:02+00:00): Artık genel hastahane olarak kullanılıyor
mappinglander (2025-08-14 06:01:33+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/804028921 İsimler değişmeyebiliyor. Bina yeni hastane olarak adlandırılmadı bildiğim kasarıyla.
erkinalp (2025-08-14 10:09:57+00:00): üzerinde poliklinik B blok - yataklı servisler - acil - morg yazıyor
gscscnd (2025-07-17 04:28:14+00:00): area:highway jest bardzo czasochłonne i wymaga bardzo dokładnych podkładów. IMHO szkoda czasu.
JeroenHoek (2025-07-16 17:34:28+00:00): Dit schuurtje staat in de BAG. Als de outline niet klopt, kun je dat beter daar melden, want deze importeren we dan weer. Nu zal bij een volgende import jouw aanpassing weer ongedaan gemaakt worden.

https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/?searchQuery=1900100010090143
Hufkratzer (2025-07-17 20:40:30+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/324457236/history ist aber ein großer hot_tub geworden! Hast du dich da evtl. vertippt?
Heideammer (2025-07-18 13:12:30+00:00): Vielen Dank für das aufmerksame Kontrollieren. Eigentlich wollte ich daraus horse_riding machen. Da ging aber etwas daneben. Ich kann es leider erst in gut 10 Tagen editieren.
Hufkratzer (2025-07-20 00:15:24+00:00): Ich habe es auf horse_riding geändert und sonst noch etwas ergänzt / verbessert so wie mir das nach Luftbild möglich erschien. Kannst es ja irgendwann kontrollieren / korrigieren.
osmuser63783 (2025-08-10 23:10:03+00:00): Hi. Thanks for updating the map! A node for this shop already existed (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3402048919), so we have updated it with the data about the new occupier