piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NorthCrab_upload (2024-05-14 20:00:26+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/270946058

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/270945941

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
WieKo68 (2024-06-10 16:55:10+00:00): Poprawiono - dodano nazwę ulicy
ivanbranco (2024-06-25 23:04:16+00:00): Hi WieKo68,

https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/270945941

could you take a look at this wikimedia_commons value? I already deleted it once but I see you re-added. The image is missing the file extension, I tried adding .jpg or .JPG but I found nothing.
WieKo68 (2024-06-26 18:42:01+00:00): There was indeed an error. I have already corrected it to the correct value
ceyu (2024-05-17 17:00:46+00:00): Hallo, danke fuer deinen Changeset. Ich habe nur eine Frage. Hast du mit payment:cash=yes gemeint, dass hier mit "Bitcoin Cash" gezahlt werden kann? Der Tag bedeutet naemlich nur, dass hier mit Bargeld gezahlt werden kann. Der korrekte Tag fuer "Bitcoin Cash" waere currency:BCH=yes.
schnapsundliebe (2024-05-17 20:54:32+00:00): Hallo! Nein, ich meinte es genau so, wie es eingetragen wurde. Das Lokal akzeptiert Bargeld (=Cash) und Bitcoin (On-Chain & Lightning). No shitcoins und keine Kredit- oder Bankomatkarten allowed.
osmviborg (2024-05-15 04:17:29+00:00): Revertet - vandalisme
miluethi (2024-05-14 20:45:00+00:00): Hi Perrier500,

Please always square out building by pressing the "Q" key.

Thank you for contributing to OSM Nicaragua.
Perrier500 (2024-05-14 20:58:03+00:00): I just pressed "Q" on map #38.  Did I do it right?
miluethi (2024-05-14 21:32:30+00:00): I already squared these building shapes. 
Squaring is easy - if you select a shape or simply drawing a shape, pressing "Q" will make right angle.
Try it out ;-)
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-05-14 20:27:00+00:00): These stubs aren't put there for fun. The plans obviously expect it to be extended.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151330460
Ewrt1 (2024-05-16 02:56:00+00:00): @Spaghetti Monster🍝
But then the stubs were "proposed to be extended" by how you extended it
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-05-15 09:54:17+00:00): golf course outline is already mapped https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30097259
QuintBM (2024-05-15 19:03:18+00:00): thanks, being a noob i hadn't spotted that. i will aim to finish the east. if you spot any other issues and can flag them, it'll make me look like less of a noob fool. :-)
eggie (2024-05-14 20:23:12+00:00): Dag Mijaky Svp de BAG data  intact te laten.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=151330627
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-05-15 06:17:13+00:00): Fixed BAG data
Filip009 (2024-05-18 17:29:11+00:00): Dobrý deň, vďaka za záujem o prispievanie do OpenStreetMap.
Len by som vám chcel povedať, že nie je nutné explicitne uvádzať, že daná cesta nie je jednosmerná. Každá cesta, ktorá nie je nastavená ako jednosmerná sa berie, automaticky ako obojsmerná.
Pokiaľ máte ďalšie otázky neváhajte kontaktovať slovenskú OSM komunitu https://groups.google.com/g/osm_sk.
eggie (2024-05-15 06:45:17+00:00): Beste  Is het werkelijk de bedoeling dat de Veldhoeve openstaat voor motorvoertuigen? 
Mvg
eggie
eggie (2024-05-15 06:51:36+00:00): Ik heb motor_vehicle=designated verwijderd van de Veldhoeve. Het is voetgangersgebied.
Wat is hier veranderd dat dit wegdeel zou zijn opengesteld voor regulier verkeer?
Wellicht motor_vehicle=destination? 
Laat maar even weten svp.
MVG
eggie
Shanthos (2024-05-17 13:20:58+00:00): oke is goed
miluethi (2024-05-14 20:49:41+00:00): Hi Lauren,

Please square buildings. Just press the "Q" with a selected building shape.

Most building are square, there might be a tree covering part of the building. Also narrow the building shape to the real building not including any shadows around the building.

Thank you for contributing to OSM Nicaragua.
Shandhivya (2024-05-16 07:50:33+00:00): The mapping is looking fantastic, thanks to your contributions. Keep it up. #OMGURU
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151331451
NOCanoa (2024-05-14 20:53:58+00:00): edit: retirei a etiqueta de Alexmol, substituindo pelo edifício.
NeisBot (2024-05-14 21:00:06+00:00): Hi Onlythesoul, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1283013509

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
eggie (2024-05-15 04:35:29+00:00): Hi NeisBot..
This is the second time a revert was needed.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151027799#map=19/51.95374/5.20585
Greetz,
eggie
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-15 05:11:18+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/151338509
NeisBot (2024-05-14 21:00:08+00:00): Hi Onlythesoul, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1283014480

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
WoodWoseWulf (2024-05-15 03:05:24+00:00): Hello Onlythesoul, Please do not add fictional features to the map.
eggie (2024-05-15 04:46:58+00:00): Hi ...This is the second time a revert was needed due to damage  the map.
Never got a reply from Onlythesoul.
For a starting mapper it is tricky to edit the coastline. 
See also https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151028044#map=15/51.9624/5.1907&layers=N
Greetz,
eggie
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-15 05:10:32+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/151338513
WoodWoseWulf (2024-05-15 05:41:14+00:00): There are many new mappers coming to OSM to add beaches at the moment thanks to a recent update in Pokémon Go. Beaches now trigger the appearance of a certain type of Pokémon (although the map data the game is using is rather old).
eggie (2024-05-15 06:02:54+00:00): Hi.... infact there are small small beaches between the groins. 
Drawing beaches on top of the water has no use ofcourse. No rendering.
But changing the coastline is tricky for a starting mapper. Broken mp's, crossing and self intersecting polygones.
I created some beach examples but had no reply fom this mapper.
He started again editing the coastline and created new beached further inland.
Certainly Pokemonedits.
pitfire (2024-05-15 04:31:56+00:00): Hi  Blauwdruk,

Bedankt voor uw wijzigingen.
Waarom krijg je volgens jouw interpretatie “roof:shape=gabled”? Het is echt “dak:vorm = plat”
Betr.:
Weg: 28943572 & Weg: ALDI Süd (126960671)

Guß pitfire
pitfire (2024-05-15 08:44:44+00:00): Hi Blauwdruk,
thanks, it's done
I adjusted the shape of the roof.
Gruß
Blauwdruk (2024-05-18 11:46:44+00:00): Thank you. I checked again and it is indeed 'gabled'.
NeisBot (2024-05-14 21:10:05+00:00): Hi Chocola19, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/node/11905246597

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-15 04:52:50+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/151332080
NeisBot (2024-05-14 21:15:05+00:00): Hi ManInYourFridge, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature's:
https://osm.org/way/1283016853
https://osm.org/way/1283016854

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
WoodWoseWulf (2024-05-14 21:28:19+00:00): Removed, DWG report raised.
literan (2024-05-15 20:11:30+00:00): такой?

https://www.google.com/search?newwindow=1&sca_esv=0a002056b542477b&q=%D0%BF%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%BC%D0%B0%D1%82+cainiao&uds=ADvngMhhDoUiRlghAkhZNdYT43b0SfdUeieASxWLR8DPNx6L6OC3NgbdkHF8dVl3XRHd4Znql33dPHoB-FJL1D6z8KW1YQ3NIdYi4ldKsgboCIbKXXhwMZKUa0IRrxW9-nBCmfiPVXklt6fiuXKhMLqmoU7R_yfLHdcr9syLuJJNyYXNAvnLv8Mn-5NxaQa_aFZyTnikp3u3OV6Yok5oOoeq2mdJxvSQGKPrIM5Y9HiPGs-dQLgZa3KMsHe-qi2ANLrpVbqcvQWOV2opGhp5iw7K7PF-5sClEof4tatv6zjep98XYLrfZIFRdzwxlnSNo1bt0RBWADyCAb0qX07mW5iWzljWNTptPQ&udm=2&prmd=sivmnbt&sa=X&sqi=2&ved=2ahUKEwigkMW3u5CGAxUoExAIHcBWBS8QtKgLegQILxAB&biw=1412&bih=1278&dpr=1

Cainiao
Mixigodo (2024-07-22 11:54:21+00:00): Boas, Rodrigo. Pasei o outro día por aquí e vin que este enlace está arranxado, parece ser que dende hai meses xa (https://www.elprogreso.es/articulo/a-marina/reabre-acceso-burela-foz-n-642/202312271429531718862.html).

Non sei se tes acceso a imaxes aéreas máis recentes, porque de memoria non podo confirmar se o trazado actual da estrada é exactamente o mesmo que o que se ve na capa PNOA (anterior ao derrubamento, penso), aínda que penso que si. Se non, igual sería bo deixar unha nota para que algunha persoa da zona o edite se pode?

Saúdos.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151332628
Rodrigo Rega (2024-07-24 20:55:21+00:00): Boas. O mapeado que fixen foi dende fotos de PNOA 2023. Hai algúns meses que non paso por alí, así que non sei como estará agora mesmo. Non vexo problema en abrir unha nota se queres. Un saúdo.
Mixigodo (2024-07-28 19:41:28+00:00): Ola!

Eu edito habitualmente no navegador co editor iD, e penso que as imaxes que me aparecen para Galicia son do PNOA 2020, polo que non vía o trazado que ti mapeaches. Agora, revisando o PNOA 2023, xa vin as imaxes do trazado que ti fixeches.

En calquera caso, penso que si, que o seu sería deixar unha nota para que alguén poida revisar in situ como está a zona e actualizala conforme á realidade no OSM. Ábroa entón, mil grazas!

Saúdos.
ManuelB701 (2024-05-15 07:08:15+00:00): Beim Verschieben der Halteposition des Südfriedhofs zeigten die Linien immer noch auf den alten Punk, wo du jetzt eine Querung gesetzt hast. Dies habe ich korrigiert aber beim nächsten mal solltest du etwas vorsichtiger sein. ;)

(Zugegebenermaßen ist iD auch wirklich nicht für Buslinien geeignet bzw. mit den Entfernen von Knoten von Wegen und die Zuordnung der Relationen.)
eggie (2025-01-06 15:22:46+00:00): Hoi Martin,

In de Blauwe tunnel in Dordt (Dubbeldamseweg)  had je bicycle en foot=use_sidepath getagd op het fietspad zelf!
Dat routeerde helaas niet meer vanaf zo'n 8 maanden terug.
Ik kwam er nu achter door een tip van een lokale mapper.

Blijf steeds checken svp, want een 'foutje' is zo gemaakt.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=151333892&zoom=18&lat=51.8022&lon=4.67888&layers=B000000TTTFT

MVG en nog de beste wendsen..   Kan nog net. 
eggie
emvee (2025-01-06 20:28:56+00:00): Bedankt voor het doorspelen en ook nog de beste wensen.

Ja, dat was duidelijk fout, ik had verwacht dat Osmose dat wel zou vlaggen, daar kijk ik toch wel eens per maand naar maar blijkbaar zit z'n regel nog niet in Osmose, ik zal eens kijken, er is namelijk wel een check voor *=use_sidepath in combinatie met cycleway=*, zie http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/issues/open?item=3032&source=&class=30329 maar zo te zien inderdaad niet highway=cycleway met *=use_sidepath/no.

Bij het maxspeed mappen kom ik ook wel dit soort problemen tegen, gisteren nog "car=no" op een stuk doorgaande weg.

Groeten,

Martin.
eggie (2025-01-06 20:35:48+00:00): Een foutmelding zal niet meer te zien zijn, want nu hersteld.
Het 'vervelende' is dat osrm en valhalla geen rekening houden met use_sidepath.
GraphHopper weer wel.
Die neemt het trapje.
De OFM routeert helemaal niet hier.
Zal a.s. zaterdag nog even checken.

Groet..
eggie
emvee (2025-01-06 21:25:44+00:00): Mijn favoriete router, brouter heeft er geen problemen mee, http://brouter.de/brouter-web/#map=17/51.80405/4.67668/standard&lonlats=4.676598,51.804137;4.68244,51.801311, ik zie wel hoge "strafpunten" omdat hij er van uit gaat dat je dat stuk loopt.

Inmiddels de Osmose code bekeken maar inderdaad geen waarschuwing voor  highway=cycleway met *=use_sidepath/no. Ik ga een patch aanleveren ;-)
eggie (2025-01-06 21:30:51+00:00): 👍
mikimapbuilder (2024-05-15 06:33:19+00:00): It seems that there is no lake here based on imagery
ChristopherGS (2024-05-21 01:19:43+00:00): Thanks for adding to the local map. Please remember that building=* tags represent where the building connects with the ground. So, St Stephens has a peaked roof, but the building itself is a rectangle, so you can estimate where the base is.
NeisBot (2024-05-14 22:45:05+00:00): Hi FlyToSpace, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1283041081

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
NeisBot (2024-05-15 05:06:57+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151340196
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-15 05:07:18+00:00): Please don't add fake beaches to OSM!
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-05-17 00:11:51+00:00): Reviewed
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151334504
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:11:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:13:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:23:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
jpennycook (2024-05-15 14:07:42+00:00): Hi!

In the aerial imagery, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/464808090 has "BUS LANE" in paint, and there is a no entry sign with "Except buses and emergency vehicles".  Can you confirm that this sign has now been removed and all motor vehicles can now use this section of road?

Jon
rskedgell (2024-07-21 19:51:43+00:00): Traffic calming tags can be added to the entire length of a highway segment if they are not mapped as individual nodes on the highway. Please do not delete the tag from the highway unless you have also mapped the individual traffic calming features as nodes.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:traffic_calming
NeisBot (2024-05-14 23:20:05+00:00): Hi Ayonotsus, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1283046103

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-15 05:05:51+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/151335995

The user deleted her/his own fake beach from the data.
Mahdi Nameghi (2024-05-15 06:49:35+00:00): This changeset reverted because of vandalism edit
Abu Qrni (2024-05-15 15:13:17+00:00): It is not sabotage, but actually this Gulf is called the Arabian Gulf
Sosha1996 (2024-05-16 13:15:52+00:00): Hey, you have changed the name of the way inside Iran. This is sabotage. Please stop.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:22:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:19:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:16:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:20:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-15 05:02:35+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/151340124
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-15 05:02:31+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/151340124
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-15 05:02:28+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/151340124
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-15 05:02:23+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/151340124
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-15 05:02:19+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/151340124
NeisBot (2024-05-15 00:30:06+00:00): Hi Veemurdz, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1283057652

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-15 05:02:15+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/151340124
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-15 05:02:09+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/151340124
emersonveenstra (2024-05-21 12:32:00+00:00): Hi there,

Thanks for the edits! A couple of small things, on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/398516719 the lane counts don't add up to 4, and on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1283057736 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/482420509 i think you meant to put turn:lanes:both_ways=left instead of 1
heyitsbench (2024-05-21 14:24:33+00:00): > #398516719 the lane counts don't add up to 4
Looking at aerial imagery of the way, it looks like the layout is as follows: one lane forward, one left turn lane for both directions, one lane backward, and one right turn lane backward. Based on the documentation of the turn key, I believe it should be mapped as four lanes, but please let me know if there is an error I can't see.
> i think you meant to put turn:lanes:both_ways=left
Yes, you are correct, no idea where my head was at doing that. Thank you! :D
heyitsbench (2024-05-21 14:26:37+00:00): Ah, I see where the issue is with the lane count. I did not tag the left turn lane for both directions. Definitely my mistake then. Again, thank you for catching these!
heyitsbench (2024-05-21 15:14:15+00:00): Issues should be resolved with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151633945.
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-15 05:02:05+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/151340124
NeisBot (2024-05-15 00:35:06+00:00): Hi Veemurdz, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature's:
https://osm.org/way/1283058517
https://osm.org/way/1283057652

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-15 05:02:00+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/151340124
NeisBot (2024-05-15 04:58:21+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151340081
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-15 05:08:46+00:00): Please don't add fake data to OSM!
CurlingMan13 (2024-05-15 02:51:42+00:00): Please do not go back to vandalizing the map by overlapping areas.  You have been asked not to do this in multiple previous changesets, but yet, you are back to doing it.  Please stop.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151336688
VLD062 (2024-05-28 19:50:23+00:00): Hi Curlingman13, I wanted to check if the recent changeset that was flagged for overlapping areas will be rolled back considering the original editor hasn't replied yet.
CurlingMan13 (2024-05-28 21:11:35+00:00): I think I fixed it whenI left the comment - otherwise I forget and the errors remain.

If it isn't fixed yet (and they make this error on future Changesets), it should just be reverted.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:19:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
webfil (2024-10-08 12:55:16+00:00): Bonjour. Merci pour votre modification. Elle a malheureusement entraîné la disparition de l'élément place=village pour le nœud 2522461919 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2522461919), ce qui entraîne la disparition de l'étiquette pour ce village. J'ai rétabli la version précédente.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:17:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601