piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mos_next_door (2024-09-30 07:01:28+00:00): Hi. Please add only real-world data to the map. There is no square-shaped stream in Nork Marash.

Здравствуйте. Пожалуйста, добавляйте только реально существующие данные. В Норк-Мараше нет квадратного ручья вдоль улиц.
Frans S (2024-09-30 10:19:59+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please tag buildings under construction as
building=construction +
construction=building 
Thanks
pitscheplatsch (2024-09-28 12:54:13+00:00): Hi j365, welcome to OSM.

May we know the reason behind removing the highway-tag of the following way? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/10862456

Thanks.
j365 (2024-09-28 18:38:35+00:00): That was accidental. Didn't realize I removed that.
pitscheplatsch (2024-09-29 06:21:41+00:00): Thank you for your answer.

Can you revert the mentioned edit?
j365 (2024-09-29 16:47:22+00:00): Ok, I think I replaced the highway tag. I wasn't sure how to revert the change, but let me know if there's anything else I need to do to fix it.
pitscheplatsch (2024-09-30 11:13:18+00:00): Yes, looks good. Thanks.
Kovoschiz (2024-09-28 08:04:52+00:00): Please don't disconnect true `=pedestrian` from roads. They can physically accommodate cars.
Kovoschiz (2024-09-28 08:08:10+00:00): 2. Please don't move `barrier=` to intersecting points between `highway=` . This is invalid.
Marc_ch (2024-10-01 10:38:12+00:00): Bonjour,
est.-ce que ce sont vraiment des toilettes publiques qu'un promeneur peux utiliser ou c'est réservé à l'exploitant de la parcelle ?
Parce qu'au milieu de l'exploitation, cela n'a pas l'air d'être des toilettes publiques :)
Salutations,
Marc
Kovoschiz (2024-09-28 07:52:12+00:00): 1. Please don't delete linear `highway=` when creating `highway=` + `area=yes` . They are needed for routing. 
2. `=pedestrian`  should be used for pedestrianized street area which can physically accommodate cars. Otherwise `=footway` should be used.
End0fLine (2024-09-28 02:22:53+00:00): Hello toomuchfreetime! Building types are nice, but aren't necessary if you don't know them. Your edit looks fantastic, though iD seems to be complaining that the top gate needs to be a way and not a node.

Thank you for your contribution!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157191552
Taya_S (2026-01-15 08:24:42+00:00): Reverted as vandalism/import

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177248701
kantheasian (2024-09-29 00:34:43+00:00): Hello B22789,

I have an inquiry regarding your edits on Home of the Arts complex in Gold Coast. In this edit, did you included the footprint of the recently constructed arts gallery, and the new amphitheater?
End0fLine (2024-09-28 02:21:14+00:00): Correcting the previously mentioned duplicate way will take care of this issue too. Southeast side of the Hackensack Meridian Health hospital
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157192009
Friendly_Ghost (2025-03-13 00:39:12+00:00): Hi there. Thank you for contributing to the map. Unfortunately I've had to undo a few of your edits, because some objects (mainly buildings) were dragged sideways in weird ways. Could you explain what you were attempting to do?

Kind regards,
Casper
End0fLine (2024-09-28 02:20:21+00:00): Hello Garygnu! 

There appears to be two ways overlapping on the southeastern corner of the Hackensack Meridian Health hospital. You should be able to fix this by deleting the extra parking aisle
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157192026
Garygnu (2024-09-28 03:16:25+00:00): Thank you, I have no idea what I am doing.  It is actually an office building with some surgical inside, but I believe may have been mapped incorrectly.  No idea how to fix and clarify the parking area.  Thank you for any help.  The lot is 2 ways all throughout.
End0fLine (2024-09-28 03:34:38+00:00): No problem! You did a good job. I will go ahead and delete the only issue I found :)
DUGA (2024-10-18 03:37:26+00:00): DCNR is garbage, please do not bring junk data back to the map.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/10648778/history#map=17/41.353816/-76.238669
Striddler (2025-09-18 01:07:06+00:00): The PGC themselves call the access road into SGL57 from the intersection with 487 "Mountain Springs Road," as do locals who hunt, bike, and hike SGL57. Please elaborate on how that name is "garbage" and what you saw in a ground survey that contradicted this.
DUGA (2025-09-18 02:10:15+00:00): I don't consider any names not published by the county government, sorry...but no sorry.
End0fLine (2024-09-28 01:51:35+00:00): Hello eerib! Your new logging road and towers look great. I can't see one of them from aerial photos, but I'm sure you know whats there. 

My only suggestion would be where your logging road crosses a waterway, I would update the road with either a bridge or a ford.

I have a link to the wikipage for ford below

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:ford%3Dyes

Please let me know if you have any questions!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157192646
End0fLine (2024-09-28 01:47:44+00:00): Hello valoriePH! Your sidewalk looks fantastic. One thing I would do when a sidewalk crosses a road, even if not marked, is add a crossing where the two ways cross. 

Wiki page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:footway%3Dcrossing

Please let me know if you have any questions!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157192657
valoriePH (2024-09-28 17:55:43+00:00): Hi End0fLine, thanks for responding! 

I ended up trying OSM on a whim of curiosity yesterday after exploring some Github pages.

Yes, I did forget to mark the unmarked crossways in some of these places. I'll make sure to go back and correct them. Would marking them as a point be good enough in this case, or are there extra things I should be aware of for better practice and navigation?

And yes, I'll check out the wiki from now on! I somehow missed that there was one in the first place, that's on me. Again, thanks for the immediate feedback!
End0fLine (2024-10-10 15:40:57+00:00): I am sorry for the late response. If you ask around people that map, you're going to get various answers. *My* method (not the "correct" one!) is to have both a node where the ways cross, as well as change the sidewalk way (where it crosses the road) to a marked/unmarked crossing. 

Here is one I did when I first started mapping if you want to check it out:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/search?lat=32.347172&lon=-97.386256#map=19/32.347171/-97.386256

One that I need to go back and fix in that area is adding curb nodes on each side of the crossing. 

Don't be afraid to reach out again!
End0fLine (2024-10-10 15:53:55+00:00): Oh, also, welcome to OSM! Even if you've already left, you've made the map better than it was :)
End0fLine (2024-09-28 02:14:29+00:00): Hello Krizza! Your new church node looks good. I wanted to say that the information appears to be duplicated on the church node and the "place of worship" way around the church. 

There isn't a right or wrong way here, but the name should appear only on one of the objects. The place of worship area located *around* the church should not be tagged as a building. 

Please check the "Religious Campus" area of the below OSM wiki article.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dreligious
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157192850
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-17 03:40:51+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165052370
umapjpnic793 (2024-10-05 19:52:35+00:00): This seems to be changeset where some objects cannot be identified.
Smokin' Billy (2024-10-06 01:20:35+00:00): Hello,
This changeset is vandalism.

JA:破壊行為
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:破壊行為

I have reverted changeset:157193280.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157521629
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157193280
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-17 03:23:17+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165052160
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-10 01:03:46+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164747085
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-17 03:23:18+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165052160
user_5359 (2024-10-08 16:13:26+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1318936499 . What ist the meaning of the tag "INEGI: CVE_MZA" = 1505600090178040 (notice the blank side of the key)?
ggezzer (2024-10-08 17:31:14+00:00): INEGI: autonomous public body responsible for regulating and coordinating the National System of Statistical and Geographic Information in Mexico.
CVE_MZA means "Clave de Manzana (Block Code)".
Where "Manzana" means a territorial extension made up of one or more properties for residential, commercial, industrial, service or vacant land use; it can generally be surrounded, is delimited by roads and sometimes complemented on some of its sides by a defined feature.
The blank space is an error that must be fixed.
Taksine (2024-09-28 05:56:18+00:00): 根据维基百科的内容修改
AndyB_66 (2025-09-24 19:16:18+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-09-29 22:00:54+00:00): This changeset left deadend oneway roads.
Please provide a source for the updated layout.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157195638
Mxdanger (2024-10-09 03:20:51+00:00): Hi, just letting you know this road doesn't have any cycleways and the tag you used would be invalid as the shoulder is used for parking. I've made an edit to correct it.
bagis (2024-09-28 06:11:25+00:00): Should be: Solves https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3756850
eggie (2024-09-28 08:03:35+00:00): Welkom bij OSM, 

Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Wellicht beter de bestaande adresnode gebruiken om op bij te taggen.
Import nieuwe gebouwen zijn aan te vragen via het forum van OSM.

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-09-28 08:10:57+00:00): Importverzoek loopt
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/bag-importverzoeken/3394/2595
eggie (2024-09-28 09:41:23+00:00): Helaas nog niet in de BAG
eggie (2024-09-28 15:36:55+00:00): Dag Joachim,

Het lijkt me helemaal correct wanneer Vistrap Archem echt de geografische naam is. Mooi gebied om te fietsen.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-09-28 15:41:02+00:00): For the additional waterbody, draw the area area and tag it with natural=water + water=fish_pass.

Ik heb dat aan het vlak toegevoegd
map per (2024-11-02 12:09:56+00:00): Hi Bengosul,

this edit looks like you intended to add addresses to OSM. But what you actually did was adding a lot of tourist apartments.
Organic Maps doesn't support adding addresses at the moment, so it would be better to use another app, like StreetComplete, for that.

Best regards
map per
Hufkratzer (2024-09-28 19:17:51+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1298119563 was correctly tagged as a riding arena (pitch + equestrian) and you retagged it; but it is not a complete "horse center" (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:leisure=horse_riding).  If the riding arena belongs to a horse center you can map this horse center as a separate object (node or area), example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/767569060
chrizy (2024-10-10 08:06:49+00:00): Hi,
Sorry, I switched back to horseback riding. Is it all right now?
Hufkratzer (2024-10-10 11:11:04+00:00): I don't understand this answer.

As I wrote at the beginning, the area https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1298119563 looks like a riding arena, and in OSM riding arenas are normally tagged with leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian. And that's how it was before you changed it.

It looks like you are mixing up the tags, because https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/795246825 is an equestrian centre and should be tagged with leisure=horse_riding instead of leisure=pitch.

This is correct: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/287693369, compare https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a#Riding_centre_(equestrian)
chrizy (2024-10-12 08:23:35+00:00): Hi, I think I updated the wrong tag, I agree. Sorry for that.
You seem to know very well how to annotate these places, why don't you update them by yourself? I will not complain about it ;)
Hufkratzer (2024-10-12 19:25:47+00:00): I was afraid that you would make more changes like that. That is why I wanted to draw your attention to it. If you hadn't corrected it yourself, I would probably have done it myself at some point. But it is better the way it is now :)
user_5359 (2024-10-08 16:14:41+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1318571645. What is the mean of the tag "INEGI:CVE_LOC" = 150560009?
user_5359 (2024-10-08 16:16:27+00:00): Welcome to OSM (again!) Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1318926441 (one of fourty objects). What is the mean of the tag INEGI:CVE_MZA = 1505600090178016 ?
ggezzer (2024-10-08 17:38:37+00:00): "CVE_LOC" means "Clave de Localidad (Town Code)".
The names of the labels corresponding to INEGI were taken from the following link: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/INEGI
martien-176 (2024-09-28 15:05:03+00:00): Hi,  thanks for mapping. You requested a review of your mappings. 

Your buildings are well mapped. Good location, square corners and precise outline. 

But watch out for features that look like buildings, but could be in fact courtyards. Eg:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1318948593
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1318948594

Look for shadows inside the object, color differences. Also double check alternative imageries.

Thanks and regards, Martien, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157197460
Aleksandar Matejevic (2024-09-30 08:20:44+00:00): Hi MK1, 
instead of deleting admin_level=4 relations, maybe reverting them and changing to boundary=census would be more precise?
MK 1 (2024-10-05 13:12:43+00:00): Macedonia has no [boundary=census]. 
Administrative units are just municipalities. And those for census are same as municipality borders.
Aleksandar Matejevic (2024-10-07 06:19:19+00:00): Thanks for the explanation
vrix (2025-03-06 16:10:22+00:00): Hi all, I also think we should revert these deletions. Why remove the statistical regions? In every wiki I can find they're mentioned, thus deleting them is incorrect. Refs: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mk:WikiProject_Macedonia/Administrative_Boundaries and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statistical_regions_of_North_Macedonia

In particular, on the first link, you can see that statistical regions are considered in the official OSM wiki for MK.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-10-07 09:44:43+00:00): jak są tylko wysepki dla pieszych to nie ma sensu rozdzielać

tak samo jak jest rząd elastycznych słupków to nie tworzymy rozdzieleń wokół każdego słupka
:-} (2024-10-10 14:21:42+00:00): Normalnie jest wyspa z kostki brukowej, a takie coś raczej zalicza się do fizycznego rozdzielenia jezdni. Odwalta się ode mnie
nevw (2024-09-28 09:32:01+00:00): Hi, you have placed this business on the footway. Can you place it over the part of the building it operates from thanks.
nevw (2024-09-28 09:36:28+00:00): Is the building named "The Mill Markets" on OSM the same site.
If so, should I merge you info to the building and use the name you have provided instead?
Rowan_AU (2024-09-28 10:12:07+00:00): G'day nevw, yes, please merge with the existing info and change the name to the one I provided, thanks.
nevw (2024-09-28 10:17:24+00:00): Thanks Rowan, I’ll do that tomorrow if time permits
woodpeck_repair (2024-11-04 13:10:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 158739903 where the changeset comment is: Löschungen von Wegen rückgängig gemacht. Diskussion in https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/wegeloschungen-markischer-kreis-nahe-iserlohn/121121
Sebimm (2024-10-02 17:38:22+00:00): Path exists and it seems to be a regularly used downhill-mountainbiking track. I just walked it coming from north-west but it turns south halfway and connects to the road parallel and north of the "Ulmkebach" (and did not seem to continue to the east).

Did you maybe only check the path from the eastern side?

Kind regards.
woodpeck_repair (2024-11-04 13:10:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 158739903 where the changeset comment is: Löschungen von Wegen rückgängig gemacht. Diskussion in https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/wegeloschungen-markischer-kreis-nahe-iserlohn/121121
Romwriter (2024-09-28 16:57:02+00:00): Guten Tag Stuhrer und herzlich willkommen bei Openstreetmap! Zu diesem Änderungssatz habe ich eine Rückfrage: Wie wird die Gegend genannt? Beste Grüße, Romwriter
Stuhrer (2024-09-28 23:33:22+00:00): Nach der Magdeburger Straße (und der Bushaltestelle dazu) i.d.R. „Magdeburger-Viertel“ - allerdings ist die Bezeichnung auch nicht weit verbreitet. Oft ist es einfach nur ein Viertel ohne besonderen Namen.
Romwriter (2024-09-29 16:18:06+00:00): Inzwischen habe ich bei Google nach verschiedenen Kombinationen von "Stuhr", "Brinkum", "Magdeburger", "Mitteldeutschland" und "Viertel" gesucht. Nach meinem Eindruck sind die einzigen Treffer diejenigen Webseiten, die bei Openstreetmap abgeschrieben haben. Weder die Lokalpresse noch der Immobilienmarkt noch sonst jemand verwendet diese Begriffe. Von mir aus können wir die Bezeichnung gerne komplett löschen.
Stuhrer (2024-09-29 16:37:23+00:00): Sehr gerne.
Romwriter (2024-09-29 17:20:06+00:00): erledigt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157264397
FajrAl (2024-10-04 13:11:19+00:00): yang di bawah, down-grade saja ke jalan perumahan
Dinoafr (2024-11-12 08:42:00+00:00): Terimakasih inputnya Mas, Seingat saya waktu itu hanya merubah gap StreetName, untuk men down-grade, mungkin masih bisa menjadi "Secondary Road" atau "Tertiary Road", Mas Fajar bisa update jika sependapat :-)
CurlingMan13 (2025-02-05 03:47:08+00:00): Changeset reverted.  These are residential roads, not living streets.  Living streets are very rare in the US.
See:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dliving_street#United_States

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162149187
InsertUser (2024-09-28 14:19:24+00:00): Please don't do changes on different continents all in the same changeset.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
Ygramul (2024-09-28 14:54:40+00:00): Ah, apologies. I haven't paid attention to the bounds (I didn't even use background imagery here). Typically such typos are very closely grouped when they appear multiple times. Normally I do take care of keeping changesets small and focused. Sorry for this one here.
CurlingMan13 (2025-02-05 03:54:24+00:00): Changeset reverted.  These are residential roads, not living streets.  Living streets are very rare in the US.
See:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dliving_street#United_States

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162149283
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-09-29 21:48:38+00:00): This changeset left deadend oneways. Please provide a source for the updated layout.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157199934
Ich2PunktNull (2024-09-30 17:22:58+00:00): Seema like I forgot to turn two higway parts

corrected it now
TrickyFoxy (2024-09-29 00:09:02+00:00): Вы удалили кучу валидных данных (например с викидатой). Не надо так, особенно никак не прокомментирую свою правку
TrickyFoxy (2024-09-29 00:10:16+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157232641
HellMap (2024-09-28 11:01:32+00:00): Can you please clarify what the source is for the road names like "Cērpas - Ozolgatves" and "Ziemeļi - Strīķeri" and "Dienvidu ceļš" and others?

Your changeset only specifies aerial imagery and notes as sources, and I don't see any notes here about the road names.

With a quick search, I cannot find these names online. I also don't see them in the official territory plan.

Also, like previously asked, please don't delete existing roads like [1] and redraw them [2], but adjust the existing road.

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1127597788/history

[2] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1318961798
Colbertson (2024-09-28 13:35:34+00:00): Heres some links about the deleting/redrawing issue.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/utilsplugin2#Replace_one_way_with_another_way
https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Help/Action/ImproveWayAccuracy
Mashin (2024-10-06 13:40:02+00:00): Here you deleted a correct building that contained a correct street name and house number. Your 44 A-C should have expanded the original information in the address field not replace the already good data.
contrapunctus (2024-09-28 10:09:00+00:00): Hi Devika, welcome to OSM! 

Please use the name field for verifiable names only. For example, is there a sign here that says "Open Area"? Or is this park known as "Open Area" by the locals?

If not, it's perfectly okay to leave the name field blank. Happy mapping. 🙂️
NorthCrab_upload (2024-09-28 09:41:03+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12206656971
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/912013716

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Barroszt (2025-08-04 22:34:54+00:00): ktoś poprawił
Vinber (2024-11-10 17:03:00+00:00): Bonjour,
j'ai vu que tu avais ajouté le bati à la "cité Piron". J'ai retiré le landuse=construction car il semble y avoir des voitures visibles sur l'ortho 2024 donc c'est habité maintenant je pense.
à plus
Le Petit Léo (2024-11-11 01:22:28+00:00): Bonjour,
Oui effectivement ça a l'air même bien habité. Désolé je n'avais pas fait attention au landuse=construction. Il faut dire que je me suis penché sur les landuse il y a quelques semaines seulement. Comme je cartographie depuis peu, je fait petit à petit. En regardant un peu mieux on voit aussi juste à côté un landuse=farmland avec des habitations à l'intérieur : il faudra le supprimer. Et du coup peut-être revérifier tous ceux autour. Les adresses sont aussi à ajouter sur ce lotissement.
Je commence à mieux maîtriser JOSM mais aurais-tu une astuce pour que les landuses soient plus visibles ? A l'image du rendu "Coloured Street" qui est super pratique quand on fait l'adressage.
Bonne soirée.
Vinber (2024-11-11 09:44:23+00:00): je viens de tester le rendu coloriage de Landcover tags, cela marche bien pour le vin, j'ai pas testé ailleurs.

je n'ai pas vu les farmland dont tu parles, n'hésites pas à pointer, je veux bien jeter un oeil
Le Petit Léo (2024-11-11 20:33:47+00:00): Pour le rendu landcover tags, je l'ai déjà mais à part la vigne, ça ne change rien pour les autres comme les residential ou les farmland. Dommage.

Voici le farmland que j'ai vu : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/256162295/history#map=19/45.108112/-0.647621&layers=N
En fait il est très visible sur le rendu openstreetmap.org contrairement à JOSM.
Vinber (2024-11-12 07:43:08+00:00): oui dans le cas présenté effectivement sans doute une erreur !

j'ai ouvert la discussion https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/un-rendu-des-landcover/28778
Frans S (2024-10-10 10:14:57+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping. 
A remark about the way high rise or multi-story buildings are often mapped 
On the imagery, you see both the roof and a sidewall (with multiple floors) 
The imagery is taken under a certain degree and shows you the height of a building.
Don't map both the roof and the sidewalls as 1 building.
Draw just the rooflines as a building and move it to the building's footprint.
See this clip.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1V5-bADsYiffCD9bo6l64YOdTvmKqMGry/view?usp=sharing

Best regards and keep mapping
Nathan_A_RF (2024-10-06 11:55:42+00:00): Please see how to correctly tag speed limit types: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxspeed:type#United_Kingdom