piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-06 11:01:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134571999 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed mechanica edits, including those referred to at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7024 and some others.  See also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/currently-ongoing-automated-edit-for-service-vehicle/97737 .
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-28 19:00:31+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2699690688
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8067014299
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2699704184
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2699689269
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/797689266
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/797689212
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/797689116

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
flohoff (2023-03-06 21:43:08+00:00): Moin,
das mit dem "name=Notaufnahme" halte ich für falsch.

In das name tag kommen Eigennamen, keine beschreibungen. Und das es die Notaufnahme ist ist doch in den tags schon gesagt.

Flo
ma-rt-in (2023-03-07 19:55:36+00:00): Hey,

hatte nur schnell das eine von der anderen kopiert. Gerne mache ich das aber noch weg.
flohoff (2023-03-08 10:30:20+00:00): 
Super - Geht mir ja auch nicht unbedingt darum das das alles immer falsch ist. Aber das "name" tag wird echt häufig missbraucht. Auch auch dem Parkplatz vor der Notaufnahme. Das ist ja beschreibend, gehört also in "description" nicht "name". 

Parkplatz heisst ja nicht "Karl-Friedrich Theodor zu Guttenberg" 

Flo
Langlaeufer (2023-02-28 20:22:00+00:00): Hast du die verkehrsberuhigten Zonen vor Ort festgestellt? Per Mapillary kann ich das nicht nachvollziehen bzw. komme zu anderen Ergebnissen.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133142223
streetuser (2023-03-02 15:42:54+00:00): Wenn die Bergstraße gemeint ist, da   stand um Zeitpunkt 7.12.2022 ein Zone 30 Schild (Steht gut 10-15m in die Straße hinein).
Langlaeufer (2023-03-02 16:35:59+00:00): Aber Tempo 30 ist ja nicht verkehrsberuhigt
Langlaeufer (2023-03-02 16:38:06+00:00): Tempo 30 Zone
highway=residential
zone:maxspeed=DE:30

Verkehrsberuhigt
highway=living_street
(impliziert maxspeed=walk)
Langlaeufer (2023-03-02 16:38:38+00:00): Ich meinte den Roggenhof
streetuser (2023-03-02 18:17:14+00:00): Roggenhof: Da steht auf/ab Höhe des Mehrfamilienhaus (121A) ein DE:325. Ich habe mal den ersten Teilweg als Serviceweg rückgebaut
Langlaeufer (2023-03-02 18:46:29+00:00): Da müssten wir dann residential machen, sonst sieht's arg merkwürdig aus
Nadzeya_ (2023-03-01 05:26:37+00:00): Added service road ,source - Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133142276
RicoElectrico (2023-03-01 14:45:51+00:00): Cześć, nie widzę w historii Twoich zmian nowej lokalizacji. Rozumiem, że pewnie już jest dodana do mapy?
mavl (2023-04-23 15:47:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:51:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:53:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
eggie (2023-02-28 19:54:11+00:00): Dag tck  'k Heb m'n vraagtekens over .. met wat je nu wilt bereiken met deze aanvullingen.
Knooppunt Rijnsweert staat toch al op een node?
Nu zet je het op een wegvak? https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=133142467
Dit zijn de turn_lanes none|none|none|slight_right|slight_right|slight_right voor de splitsing

MVG
eggie
JeroenvanderGun (2023-02-28 20:07:00+00:00): junction:name op de way is niet eens gedocumenteerd in de wiki dus ik denk niet dat dat iets uithaalt.

Eggie heeft gelijk dat je navigatiesoftware het weefvak in principe aan turn:lanes zou moeten herkennen en de instructies daarop aanpassen.

Voor OSRM is het mogelijk een handmatige navigatie-instructie te mappen met https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:manoeuvre - in dit geval zou dat manoeuvre=fork + direction=slight_left voor de invoegbeweging van A12 naar A27 zijn. Echter weefvakken zoals deze zijn zo veelvoorkomend dat het beter is de navigatiesoftware te verbeteren zodat hij het op basis van turn:lanes kan.
daperson (2023-02-28 19:06:44+00:00): bro just cassually spammed the whole world 💀💀
stevea (2023-02-28 21:01:39+00:00): This user:xxxxxxxxxxxxxa is out of control.  Let's notify the DWG.
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-28 22:06:47+00:00): They deleted items in:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133145661

I wasn't able to revert it, but did report to DWG.

They also haven't provided good changeset comments.
stevea (2023-02-28 22:11:31+00:00): DWG notified by me as well.
marczoutendijk (2023-03-01 01:31:06+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6909
stevea (2023-03-01 01:35:46+00:00): Thanks for the update, Marc.  Your block "sounds about right" (to me).

Speaking personally (the data this user damaged which I entered), I have reverted changeset 133144928, which I emailed DWG about circa five minutes ago.

"Good save."  A tip of my hat to the "blue stars" of DWG, and G'day, sir.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-03-01 02:41:46+00:00): Reverted by DWG for apparent vandalism: changeset/133152981
stevea (2023-03-01 02:48:53+00:00): Thanks, Graeme:  that was the "biggie."  I've "been workin' on the railroad" (in Alaska, USA) and I'll double-check that the relation of the branch rail that xx..xa deleted is still OK after your Revert.

Yup, just checked it...it's OK.  It's got your name on it as the last edited, but it's OK.
stevea (2023-03-01 03:12:07+00:00): Good teamwork, everybody.  Especially DWG members.
wireguy (2023-03-24 19:11:32+00:00): Jeremy,
relation 2255171 is broken

way 1051178573
was deleted.  did you mean to do that?

check out 
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=133142509
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-06 11:02:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134571999 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed mechanica edits, including those referred to at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7024 and some others.  See also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/currently-ongoing-automated-edit-for-service-vehicle/97737 .
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-28 19:10:25+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/526899557
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/526899564

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
mark2525 (2023-03-02 18:25:29+00:00): link do strony internetowej Domu Kultury z kontaktem i adresem:
https://kulturalnyknurow.pl/kontakt/
w ewidencji budynek jest bez adresu
NorthCrab (2023-03-03 04:28:14+00:00): Rzeczywiście, niech zostanie w takim razie. Chociaż trochę to dziwne :p
mark2525 (2023-03-03 20:04:56+00:00): Zgadzam się z Tobą, ja też tego nie rozumiem. Ale ten Dom Kultury to pięknie utrzymany gminny obiekt z tabliczką informującą, że jest to Górnicza nr 1. Ten obiekt po drugiej stronie ulicy to ogrodzony płotem stary zaniedbany duży pawilon bez widocznego punktu adresowego.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-06 10:59:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134571999 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed mechanica edits, including those referred to at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7024 and some others.  See also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/currently-ongoing-automated-edit-for-service-vehicle/97737 .
Fizzie-DWG (2023-03-01 02:41:34+00:00): Reverted by DWG for apparent vandalism: changeset/133152981
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-06 10:58:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134571999 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed mechanica edits, including those referred to at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7024 and some others.  See also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/currently-ongoing-automated-edit-for-service-vehicle/97737 .
Dodko (2023-03-01 22:00:08+00:00): Tá adresa na dome https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/130684087/history bola v poriadku, opravte ju späť.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10700248138
túto treba vymazať
mavl (2023-04-23 16:08:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:57:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:00:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
eggie (2023-02-28 19:45:33+00:00): Een leisure=...  is een transparant. Die hoeft helemaal geen multipolygoon te zijn. Wel als het landuse=grass is.
Dat zal ook wel de reden zijn dat je de naam niet ziet.
Denk dus die outer en inner relaties verwijderen. 
gr eggie
mavl (2023-04-23 16:12:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:56:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
Dodko (2023-03-01 21:57:43+00:00): Obec Dohňany nemá pomenované ulice.
mavl (2023-04-23 16:07:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
dcapillae (2023-02-28 19:35:00+00:00): Buenas tardes.

Gracias por los cambios.

¿Qué es «Luggage storage»? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10700273905

 ¿Se trata de un «amenity=locker»? En tal caso, se puede etiquetar como tal: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dlocker

En cualquier caso, la clave «name» no debe usarse para descripciones: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_use_name_tag_to_describe_things

Gracias por su colaboración.

Atentamente,

Daniel Capilla
CurlingMan13 (2023-03-02 00:11:13+00:00): Please use "q" to square the buildings and ensure it actually matches what is on the ground.
MxxCon (2023-03-01 02:52:46+00:00): Please note that natural=grassland tag is intended for wild grassland areas. Mowed and other maintained lawns should be tagged as landuse=grass.
You can read about both tags at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dgrass and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dgrassland
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133143504
mueschel (2023-03-05 12:02:40+00:00): Hi,
there is no "Height limit" tag in OSM. The correct one is 'maxheight'. I just fixed that for you.
mavl (2023-04-23 16:09:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:59:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
dcapillae (2023-02-28 19:45:51+00:00): Buenas tardes.

Gracias por los cambios.

La librería Luces ya está en el mapa. Por favor, evite añadir objetos por duplicado.

Atentamente,

Daniel Capilla
mavl (2023-04-23 15:55:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:48:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:03:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:00:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
emersonveenstra (2023-03-04 21:49:02+00:00): Hi,

Why did you delete the lanes tag from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/680624189 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/9629522 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/9761537 ?
wegavision (2023-03-05 05:04:19+00:00): I can't see any lanes there. Lanes=2 means that there are two lanes separated by markings.
emersonveenstra (2023-03-05 11:13:50+00:00): That doesnt matter for the lanes tag, please see the wiki article (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lanes) where it says "Note that it is valid to tag lanes count also in case where lanes are not marked with paint on the surface"

The correct way to tag roads with no lane markings is the lane_markings=no tag (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lane_markings)
mavl (2023-04-23 16:11:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:05:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
eteb3 (2024-10-17 09:08:05+00:00): Hi, 

Interested that this is tagged as a Shia mosque while most Muslim refugees in the UK are Sunni.

Do you know if it's specially provided for Shia refugees, or is it open access to anyone on the site? 

Thanks,

eteb3
UtterClutter (2024-10-18 18:55:42+00:00): Hi, I've not personally visited the site, however, it was at first an RAF base, later becoming a prison, and then a technical training centre for, I think, Saudi students. Since then it has been de-commissioned, and there is no access to the site. The Masjid was built for the Saudi students to worship there.
eteb3 (2024-10-19 05:36:50+00:00): Oh interesting, thanks. Looking more closely at the tags I see it’s not yet a refugee site. But if the masjid was for Saudi armed forces it’s all the more likely to be Sunni, I would think? If it makes sense to tag with a denomination at all in this case
mavl (2023-04-23 16:11:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
Glassman (2023-03-02 18:29:51+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133144183
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-28 20:26:47+00:00): Please use better changeset comments.  "r" tells me nothing.  What did you change, and why?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133144293
marczoutendijk (2023-03-01 01:30:53+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6909
Fizzie-DWG (2023-03-01 02:41:24+00:00): Reverted by DWG for apparent vandalism: changeset/133152981
RaphaelPasloin (2023-03-01 02:02:06+00:00): Hello,

Why do you have removed network and operator info ? https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/node/2571061754 

Also please : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Max-Kritic (2023-03-01 06:51:20+00:00): Le réseau et l'opérateur doivent  être portés par les lignes de transport (relations) et non par les arrêts (points) avec la version 2 du transport (public_transport:version=2). 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:public_transport

Tu peux voir sur OSM Inspector les lignes qui sont correctes. Il reste du boulot. Toutes les lignes passent à la version 2. Voir https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=4.46691&lat=50.41985&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.81&overlays=ptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes%2Cptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes
Glassman (2023-03-02 18:31:17+00:00): addr:unit is usually for a suite within a building. Did you mean the building name is CHI Dorms Building B?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133144550
Palolo (2023-03-25 01:31:08+00:00): Thank you for contributing this valuable railway information to OSM.
What are the tags for the curves/circles coincident with the railway alignment?
george1201 (2023-02-28 20:25:12+00:00): Laut Wiki also charge=10.00 EUR/day
Scout Jens (2023-03-01 12:19:04+00:00): Vielen Dank , George. Ich habe es gleich angepasst.
RicoElectrico (2023-12-25 14:03:23+00:00): Cześć, spójrz na uwagę: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3777573

Dzięki!
emersonveenstra (2023-03-01 12:14:04+00:00): Hi,

This changeset introduced https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10700307247 which is a duplicate of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9280725370, can you please fix this? Thanks!
Jordi MF (2023-03-07 23:45:48+00:00): Hola de nou illustietor,
He eliminat el nom de l'edifici per a que no estiga repetit. Si les oficines de l'ajuntament ja estan mapejades amb un node, no cal repetir el nom en l'edifici. S'afegeix informació duplicada i redundant, "s'embruten" els resultats perquè els buscadors mostraran dos ajuntaments quan només n'existeix un.
Gràcies per millorar la base de dades d¡OSM.
Salutacions,
Jordi MF
Glassman (2023-03-02 18:36:55+00:00): The building outline should cover the entire roof line. Also please don't add personalized names to features unless it is signed that way. I can find no reference to a place called The Castle. Please review this edit and make corrections as needed. Thanks. I'll send you more info on OSM in a DM.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133144800
paunofu (2023-03-02 23:05:41+00:00): Buenas noches,

los elementos publicitarios típicos de las gasolineras, supermercados y sitios de comida rápida se etiquetan con advertising=billboard, column es mas para esos objetos cilíndricos que se pueden encontrar por ejemplo cerca de quioscos.
Lo corrijo.

Un saludo, Pau.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:advertising=billboard
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-28 20:26:16+00:00): Please use more descriptive changeset comments.  What did you change, and why?

"faf" tells me absolutely nothing.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133144928
marczoutendijk (2023-03-01 01:30:40+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6909
Fizzie-DWG (2023-03-01 02:28:51+00:00): Already reverted by 133151869
Glassman (2023-03-02 18:37:34+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133145066
eggie (2023-03-01 11:55:29+00:00): Dag S_Emo.. 
Lastige dingen.. van wat is het nu? 
Eigenlijk is de regel one feature one element.
Dus de boom zou je de boom kunnen laten met de name=Keskesboom
en dan zet je daar tegenaan het het beeldje.,
Maar nu rendert het ook naar behoren  en de validator geeft geen foutmelding...  Zou het dus zo laten. 
memorial = statue is wel de specificatie van historic=memorial en niet van wayside_shrine

Dan zou het een religeuze functie hebben.  Maar het zal waarschijnlijk meer een herinnering zijn aan de 'legende'. 

MVG
eggie
S_Emo (2023-03-01 22:08:49+00:00): Dank je wel eggie :)
Glassman (2023-03-02 18:38:14+00:00): #TIP: square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q"
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133145149
SomeoneElse (2024-09-27 10:16:27+00:00): Hello,
I know this was a year ago, but I'm just wondering what prompted the addition of "access=no" on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/852181100/history#map=18/53.749696/-2.056549 ?  It was already tagged as "motor_vehicle=private" and various other transport modes as "yes".  It's not "wrong", just ... unusual?
Best Regards,
Andy
twospeed (2024-09-27 14:19:57+00:00): Not sure why I did that!
emersonveenstra (2023-03-01 12:14:39+00:00): Hi,

This changeset introduced https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10700367293, which is a duplicate of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9560671127, could you please fix this? Thanks!
skorasaurus (2023-03-01 19:28:40+00:00): thanks for the quick edit!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133145412
Lokai (2023-03-01 20:46:49+00:00): Hallo,

als eifriger mapper könntest du wissen, dass es besser gemacht werden kann im Falle access=no und dann so viele wieder freigeben. Du kannst dir Arbeit sparen.
Und motor_vehicle=forst ist nicht korrekt. Welches Schild ist denn dort aufgestellt? Der Weg der dorhin führt hat kein Verbot, so wie du es beim Anschlussweg angiebst?

Gruß
L.
Interteutones (2023-03-02 17:29:56+00:00): Hallo,
der Weg ist ein reiner Forstweg. Zu befahren natürlich auch für den Jagdpächter. Ob irgendwo im ortsnahen Zufahrtsbereich ein Verbotsschild steht ist mir nicht bekannt.

Gruß
Der Interteutones
Lokai (2023-03-04 10:59:51+00:00): Hallo.

Welches Schild ist denn dort an dieser letzten scharfen Kurve aufgestellt?

Gruß

L.
Interteutones (2023-03-04 11:40:57+00:00): Wenn du die Kurve östlich zum Dachsberggipfel meinst, dort ist kein Schild aufgestellt. An den meisten Forstwegen befinden sich keine Schilder, da dies ausschließlich für den Forstbetrieb freigegeben sind. Ansonsten gilt dort die StVO.

Grüße
Der Interteutones.