piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
felipeeugenio (2024-02-23 12:29:55+00:00): Hello Toni
all of those are attractions? what are those?

regards
literan (2024-02-23 12:18:34+00:00): откатываю и эту правку, т.к. она исправила только половину, и внесла новые ошибки, и предыдущую правку платного вандала. К стабильной версии
nurdafur (2024-04-08 06:37:43+00:00): Hallo asdf2

Du hast unter anderem in diesem Changeset highway=path mit foot=designated und bicycle=designated zu highway=footway geändert.
Dies führt dazu, dass Renderer die Daten nicht korrekt auswerten können. Dadurch werden dann die Wege falsch dargestellt. In der Standardansicht auf OpenStreetMap.org wird der gemeinsame Fuss- und Radweg dadurch zum Beispiel als rot statt als blau gestrichelte Linie dargestellt.
Highway=footway zusammen mit bicycle=yes kann gesetzt werden, wenn Fussgänger gemäss Signalisation als Fussweg Vorrang haben und Radfahrer mit einem Zusatzzeichen erlaubt sind. Signalisierte Radwege mit foot=yes gibt es wohl in der Schweiz eher nicht.
Liebe Grüsse und weiterhin viel Spass beim Kartografieren 
Urs
Piz Pachific (2024-04-20 14:51:53+00:00): Hallo Urs
Danke für die Aufklärung, ich muss mich wohl was das angeht nochmals im Wiki genauers einlesen. Meine Absicht war, dass es sich da nicht um Pfade (path), sondern um Fusswege (footway) handelt, auf welchen auch Velofahrer explizit gestattet sind (bicycle=yes), daher dieses Tagging. Da scheint es wohl bei den Begrifflichkeiten nicht ganz intuitiv zu sein. Liebe Grüsse und auch dir danke für deine Bemühungen!
Chrigi
mcliquid (2024-02-18 07:28:40+00:00): Hi,

please note: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
bdentremont (2024-02-18 16:53:56+00:00): Has amenity=drinking_water been used to mark a stream here?  While I realize that knowledge of streams is useful as a hiking water source, that OSM tag is intended to mark potable water sources, like a drinking fountains.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Ddrinking_water

See https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4117556
evod (2025-02-25 14:27:53+00:00): Hi, unfortunately you removed oneway:bicycle=no from Scheibenbergstraße. This seems to be a common error when using StreetComplete, please be careful! I added the missing tag again. Best regards!
ssundell (2024-03-07 10:45:42+00:00): Kommentoinpa nyt tätäkin: on vähän vaikea nähdä, miten lähiöissä luikerteleva tie on primary; Myllypuronkatu on nähdäkseni suurin piirtein oppikirjaesimerkki alueellisesta pääkadusta. Sama pätee aika lailla kaikkiin tekemiisi muutoksiin Tampereen ympäristössä.

Näissä olisi hyvä olla myös jonkunlainen ihan oikea kommentti; millä perusteella tässä päivitettiin karttaa ajan tasalle?
mapperue (2024-03-07 11:16:53+00:00): Hi, what does it mean this object (node) with name "bridge"?
ssundell (2024-03-07 10:13:46+00:00): Moi! Teiden luokitteluun on ohjeistus Wikissä; valtion numeroiduilla teillä, ja erityisesti taajamien ulkopuolella, lähtökohtaisesti noudatetaan tienumeroon perustuvaa luokittelua.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Fi:Suomi/Piirto-ohjeet
Ewrt1 (2024-02-18 03:40:23+00:00): * SORRY: Richmond Link part is from my earlier edits. * iD just clicked that previous comment.
tastrax (2024-02-19 07:45:49+00:00): Hi there - just noticed that you added 000 as a phone number. This is not the norm for OSM as per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features#Triple_Zero

I have removed it from the two defibrillators.

Cheers
arichnad (2025-07-02 14:13:28+00:00): Good morning, secutanudu.

I'm looking for these trail names on other sources and I can't find them.  Do you know where I can find them on an official website?  I've checked the ground and do not see the trail names there.  Thanks in advance!

arichnad
secutanudu (2025-07-02 14:23:22+00:00): Morning - these trail names were pulled from Trailforks. MORE-MTB, the local IMBA chapter for this trail system, manages its trailforks data, so it should be accurate.
arichnad (2025-07-02 17:24:06+00:00): Hello secutanudu,

Thank you for your response.  I reached out to MORE (I imagine we are both members) and they had paragraphs of responses.  They recognized my name and apologized for the bike lane race being cancelled today!

I have a combination of responses from three people at MORE.  Since this comment is an open forum, I will send them to you in a private message.  Summary:  no, the values in Trail Forks are not correct and/or no name (so something along the lines of "Wakefield MTB Trail System"?) is the official name.

Please, let me know if you do or don't see the private message from me.  I'd be happy to move the names back to what they were, but I'd like to hear back from you first.  Thanks again!

arichnad
MxxCon (2024-02-23 17:48:34+00:00): Should this be amphitheater or bleachers?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147595543
IraGersh (2024-02-23 17:53:47+00:00): Bleachers is better.  Thanks.
This middle example photo from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Amfiteatr_muzea.JPG https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dbleachers captures exactly what it looks like.

Will change it.
Xvtn (2024-02-27 18:44:28+00:00): Hi! Since you requested a review, I looked over your recent changes here. The only suggestion I have for you is to please provide a descriptive changeset comment. You might explain what reasoning went into your decision to move this node. Thanks for your contributions!
8329 (2024-03-01 00:25:02+00:00): I believe this is the center location of the old logging town
8329 (2024-03-01 00:26:14+00:00): Powell's Valley is older than Gresham it's self, it had a post office, then it's logging town status was taken away, as it was too close to Portland.
Ong Kai Jin (2024-02-18 08:42:58+00:00): Tag landuse=residential not applicable, mostly shops.
Tag building=yes should be reserved as if someone wants to split the polygons in future.
MxxCon (2024-02-23 17:53:31+00:00): just fyi in case you didn't see it, Vespucci also has a function similar to iD to make features square/rectangular.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147596094
bxl-forever (2024-02-18 09:55:45+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM.

Nice try, I understand it’s not easy to get things right in the early days.  I did some minor fixes here.  In particular, this garden is behind a wall, so we cannot connect footways from the road onto it.  (If we do this, routers will assume we can easily get into this garden.)  Don’t worry, all the fixes have been applied and thanks for adding this garden, I didn’t know about it.
bxl-forever (2024-02-18 10:00:02+00:00): Hello,

Good job for the tree, thanks for this.

But while you were adding the tree, you seemed to inadvertently move a valid address point 18 meters away.  As a consequence, one of the houses was no longer displaying the correct address.  I just wanted to ask you to really exercice caution when you are editing.  No harm here, I could easily repair this, but sometimes small mistakes like this get unnoticed and can really poison the map and cause problems for people.

Happy mapping.
Xvtn (2024-03-21 15:02:22+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes. Looks great to me, no problems I can see! Thanks for your contributions.
rhtb0 (2024-02-18 10:08:32+00:00): 안녕하세요. 오픈스트리트맵에 오신 걸 환영합니다.
다름이 아니라 '단지 내 도로'는 그 도로가 무엇인지 설명하기 위해서 적은 건가요? 이름 칸에는 이름만 적고 그 지물이 무엇인지 부가설명을 하기 위해 사용하지 않습니다. name 태그에는 괄호 등으로 범주, 유형, 설명, 주소, 참고 사항(20xx년 완공 예정, 개교 예정, 입주 예정, 공사중, 공사 예정, 설계중, 200n년 예정, (20nn년), (예정), (20xx. 04) 등)과 같은 부가 정보를 포함하지 않습니다.
rhtb0 (2024-02-18 10:08:57+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ko:%EC%9D%B4%EB%A6%84
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ko:%EC%A2%8B%EC%9D%80_%EC%8B%A4%EC%B2%9C#%EC%9D%B4%EB%A6%84_%ED%83%9C%EA%B7%B8%EB%A1%9C_%EC%A7%80%EB%AC%BC%EC%9D%84_%EC%84%A4%EB%AA%85%ED%95%98%EC%A7%80_%EB%A7%88%EB%9D%BC
위 링크를 참고하시기 바랍니다.
rhtb0 (2024-02-18 10:10:26+00:00): 이름 칸에 name:ko에 이름을 똑같이 적어야 하고 이름(name)만 표기하면 되는것이 아닙니다. 이점 유의하시기 바랍니다.
zstadler (2024-03-28 09:40:56+00:00): שלום אלקסיי,

תודה על תרומתך למפה!

במיפוי של נחלים יש חשיבות לסדר הנקודות לאורך הקן. הקן צריך להתחיל בנקודה הגבוהה יותר של הנחל ולהתקדם במורד הנחל, עם כיוון זרימת המים.

בעריכה זו ישנם מספר נחלים שמופו בכיוון הפוך. אם נוח לך יותר ליצור את הקווים תוך עליה בנחל, אנא זכור להפוך את הכיוון בסיום הוספת הקו.

תודה,
זאב
GorALexeY (2024-03-28 09:44:08+00:00): היי.
תודה, אני ישנה את כיוון הזרימה
Vincent de Phily (2024-02-19 14:30:43+00:00): The `name:en` of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/488355770 seems wrong, should actually be in English.

Using Irish for the main `name` tag looks like the right choice according to https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4117571 ?
kapazao (2024-02-19 21:06:55+00:00): No entiendo esto de cambiar un hito kilométrico a monumento, ¿podrías explicarlo?
kapazao (2024-02-19 21:07:49+00:00): Y por favor usa comentarios más concretos sobre lo que haces, que por lo general usas cosas muy genéricas y una sola palabra y no ayuda en nada
literan (2024-02-21 20:42:46+00:00): отрисовали здание поверх дорожек. Думайте, пожалуйста, хоть немного
bxl-forever (2024-02-18 10:09:59+00:00): Hello,

Thanks for this.
Make sure to upload one change at a time.  You also added some tags on the Colruyt supermarket in Schaerbeek.  As a consequence, your change is now shown as a huge box covering all the north-east of the Brussels region.  Small changes are easier to review.  Thanks.
hackthemap (2024-07-16 17:16:22+00:00): Hi spaarkaart, thanks for your contributions! You added payment options of all debit and credit cards being accepted at this Colruyt ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/227925796 ). Is this true and it truly accepts more than just Bancontact cards as seems to be often the case?
Thanks!
spaarkaart (2024-07-16 19:41:55+00:00): Hi hackthemap,

I always use VISA debit over there, so I can confirm that.

According to this discussion, they should accept VISA credit as well if they support VISA debit. 

https://www.reddit.com/r/brussels/comments/11wfskf/colruyt/
waldviertlerkartograph (2024-03-24 17:29:00+00:00): Hallo hlfan,
gibt es einen speziellen Grund, warum du hier die L8194 als track getagged hast?
Da es sich hier (auch wenn es nicht so aussieht) um eine offizielle Landesstraße handelt, welche auch eine Nummer hat, ist das meiner Meinung nach ein highway=tertiary.
Wie siehtst du das?
LG,
waldviertlerkartograph
hlfan (2024-04-05 02:49:18+00:00): Hi,
ich kann mir schwer vorstellen, dass so viele Leute von Brand zur Grenze und nicht weiter fahren, dass die regionale Verkehrsbedeutung sich mit der Grenze so stark ändert (tertiary - track). Wenn es einen Schleichweg Richtung Rapšach bis nach Spáleniště gibt, dann sollte der einheitlich getaggt werden, ob tertiary hier angemessen ist oder eher unclassified passt kannst du dir überlegen.
LG
silversurfer83 (2024-02-18 09:08:39+00:00): Hello :)

thank you for contributing your time to the OSM project. It is much apreciated.

One thing I would like to ask of you: Please give better commets to your changes. Leaving it blank or simply stating "Aerial Imagery" doesn't really help. Giving a source is great and encouraged, so thanks for already doing that.

More detail on my request can be found in the wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Thank you for considering

and happy mapping

silversurfer83
Xvtn (2024-02-29 23:10:32+00:00): Hi! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes here. Looks good to me, no complaints! Thanks for your contributions!
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2024-03-01 13:53:59+00:00): Revert those all edit because most of those path added can not be trusted. List of this work can be seen at https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/2HkHbqm6pt/ .

This operation was conducted by 快乐的老鼠宝宝 via https://revert.monicz.dev/ , and vote approved in https://t.me/osmchina/124459/127354

Due to limit of revert tool, this time only revert those 10:

147772215
147732730
147714766
147697481
147696492
147696319
147672550
147643757
147636529
147599046

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148097648
Langlaeufer (2024-02-19 19:15:05+00:00): Hallo Docschenk,
Der Weg ist als Fußweg mit Radverkehr frei beschildert, daher würde ich highway=footway weiterhin stark beführworten. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen_kartieren
Grüße Langläufer
docschenk (2024-02-20 09:41:31+00:00): highway=footway plus bicycle=yes ist in der praktischen Bedeutung dasselbe wie highway=path, foot=designated, bicycle=yes.

Ich finde die Wiki da widersprüchlich. Sobald es gemischte Wege sind soll es path heißen, sind es "eindeutige" Wege, dann plötzlich footway oder cycleway.
Außerdem ist highway=cycleway plus bicycle= designated (bzw. dasselbe für Fußgänger) doppelt gemoppelt.

In Deutschland werden die Tags tatsächlich mal so und mal so benutzt.
Langlaeufer (2024-02-20 10:38:51+00:00): Du hast vollkommen recht.  Das ist auch meine Interpretation. 
Es gibt nur eine ganze menge Leute die mehr in footway, cycleway oder path hineininterpretieren wollen als nur eine Änderung der Defaultwerte von foot, bicycle, horse.
Aber die Diskussion machen wir mal lieber hier nicht auf.
shuvaev32167 (2024-10-08 19:45:12+00:00): Не стоит просто так понижать класс дорого с secondary до residental, особенно если это создаст разрыв в дорогах secondary
areyesl (2024-02-18 19:20:49+00:00): Hola, Daniel!
Creo que la etiqueta access debería ser yes, no customer, ya que para indicar que el aparcabicis es de pago ya está fee=yes. Este aparcabicis, que no sé si es de la estación de tren o del metro,  está en la calle, así que entiendo que cualquiera que pague la tarifa puede dejar la bici ahí, sea cliente o no. Yo he mapeado otros tres similares que han puesto en estaciones de metro, y que también están fuera, y he usado access0yes; fee=yes.

Saludos
Arcadio
dcapillae (2024-02-18 19:31:00+00:00): Hola, Arcadio.

Cambiado a «access=yes».
Bienson (2024-02-18 21:54:32+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147626481
L'imaginaire (2024-02-18 18:03:09+00:00): Dag Dory,
Laat je even weten op welke basis je de naam van het spaarbekken hebt gewijzigd? Wordt de naam ergens op het terrein aangeduid?
Dory_ (2024-02-18 19:35:31+00:00): Beste’,
Op verschillende websites vind ik vermelding van Spaarbekken Woumen, nooit Spaarbekken Blankaart. Vandaar. Indien niet correct, verander het gerust terug naar de initiele naam.
VLD549 (2024-03-23 12:35:02+00:00): Hi Dory,

Could you indicate which websites you are referring to? I can see indeed IJzervallei - Spaarbekken Woumen-Merkem as a name coming up, but I don't find sources that claim the name change from De Blankaart Spaarbekken to Spaarbekken Woumen

Thank you!
Dory_ (2024-04-04 21:14:52+00:00): Mainly websites which log observations such as https://waarnemingen.be/locations/31966/
VLD549 (2024-04-27 09:04:48+00:00): Ok, thank you.
eggie (2024-02-18 10:00:39+00:00): Hi Michel  I merged the info with the present addressnode. No need to add an address.
Greetz,
eggie
Frans S (2024-02-18 10:20:47+00:00): Hello Péter. Thanks for mapping.
Well mapped, however, please do not include a shadow of the building into your mapping.
You mapped a few very white spots along their borderlines. These white spots are the reflection of the sun on a building's roof. Just map it as a rectangular building within the white spot.
Best regards and keep mapping
maraf24 (2024-02-26 22:15:48+00:00): Źródło?
Dlaczego tory na Wierzbowej zostały oznakowane jako nieużywane?
pavvv (2024-02-26 22:18:57+00:00): local knowledge, ostatni raz były użyte na linii 33PLUS, podobnie torowisko na Kościuszki nie jest używane
maraf24 (2024-02-26 22:19:48+00:00): Dodatkowo takie użycie railway=abandoned jest wprost niezgodne z wiki, które mówi o braku szyn.
Ja kiedyś takie ogryzki dawnych linii tramwajowych tagowałem jako man_made=rails.
maraf24 (2024-02-26 22:20:59+00:00): Chodzi mi o takie ogryzki: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/595845577
maraf24 (2024-02-26 22:21:44+00:00): Tory na Wierzbowej były używane nawet wiele lat po zniknięciu 33Plus.
maraf24 (2024-02-26 22:26:02+00:00): Jak będę kiedyś w pobliżu rano w godzinach szczytu to sprawdzę, czy nadal tam trawmaj tam wjeżdza.
Natomiast przy mostach Mieszczański ten odcinek wygląda na nieużywany od bardzo dawna: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/179397404
pavvv (2024-02-26 22:29:16+00:00): akurat ten odcinek był używany rok temu na linii 1 podczas remontu gdzieś przy dworcu Nadodrze albo dalej na Żmigrodzkiej
pavvv (2024-02-26 22:34:20+00:00): Część takich skrawków torów koło rynku już była oznaczona jako railway=abandoned  chociaż miała szyny. Uznałem to rozwiązanie za bardziej pasujące niż disused, ale możesz zmienić na man_made=rail lub coś w tym stylu.
maraf24 (2024-02-26 22:37:08+00:00): I tu pojawia się pytanie, czy nieużywany, ale gotowy do użytku tor to railway=tram czy railway=disused.

Btw. tego już nie ma https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/463126500 bo ulicę wyremontowano.

Obejrzałem resztę zmian, są ok, a przynajmniej idą we właściwym kierunku, bo bardziej te tory są abandoned niż disused.
MistikRuz (2025-03-08 10:31:11+00:00): Hi,
This place name: Sent Andzhel' صينت إندزهيل', you have added it inappropriately on OSM by copying it on google map
https://maps.app.goo.gl/uadpsFW2brNizwLz6
It is not pronunciable by anyone, it is neither arabic nor kabyle. 
You should never add data from sources protected by copyright or Google Maps, because it constitutes a violation.
Best regards,
literan (2024-02-21 20:40:53+00:00): вандализм: нарисовали здание поверх станции МЦК и дорожки. Откат
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-08 18:34:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 148396825 where the changeset comment is: weitere leidige edits unerwünschter Sockenpuppen entfernt s. https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Global_ban_of_user_geocodec
eggie (2024-02-18 10:35:04+00:00): Dag ipcreeper 

Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback  Het is niet correct om adressen samen te voegen en nogmaals een adres op de gebouwomtrek te zetten.
Wat is het probleem hier?
MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community 
ps
Ik draai je edits terug.
eggie (2024-02-18 10:39:31+00:00): Reverted by changeset #147602684

Je edits Wijzigingenset #147602684
Dan kun je zien wat je hebt gedaan. 
Alle adresnodes komen direct als import vanuit de BAG (Kadaster)
Daar svp niets aan veranderen, samenvoegen.
De postcodes en adresnodes zijn weer hersteld. 
Groet
eggie
eggie (2024-02-18 11:32:26+00:00): Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=147602143
eggie (2024-02-18 11:08:29+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Tip  Houd het gebied van je edits een heel stuk kleiner.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
MrMoehritz (2024-02-18 14:43:32+00:00): Hi orexi, willkommen auf OSM, schöner erster Edit!
literan (2024-02-21 20:40:07+00:00): не надо отрисовывать уже снесенные здания. откат
K_ANNA02 (2024-02-27 11:05:49+00:00): Внесла изменения 147968268
literan (2024-02-27 11:59:01+00:00): Не надо обманывать, эту правку откатил я, еще несколько дней назад.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-27 21:15:59+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11611948273/history has it=websitedesign key that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What you intended to express by using this unusual key? Is this tag needed? Or maybe can it be expressed in a more typical way that would be easier to understand?
MorahT (2024-02-24 00:46:12+00:00): What was the reason for this change and why did you remove the island from the lake?
Cebderby (2024-02-24 18:54:56+00:00): 2 wrongly removed islands undeleted, and lakes' names case fixed x5. 
A reply from user webhound would be appreciated.
Langlaeufer (2024-02-20 14:44:06+00:00): Hallo Mariane,
Ist es eine private Zufahrt oder noch Teil des öffentlichen Weges? Der Name beinhaltet vermutlich nicht die Hausnummer, oder?
Grüße
Langläufer
Supaplex (2024-02-19 08:32:35+00:00): 道路線段可以切割，不必全部刪除重畫
silversurfer83 (2024-02-18 12:48:51+00:00): Are you sure this was spam? Looks to me like a company tried to put their poi on the map and could need some help
mueschel (2024-02-18 12:58:30+00:00): It might be a legit business, but there is no user who might need help, just somebody who takes their money and produces these nodes.

These entries come from some SEO company, not from the business themselves. This is evident from the fact that nodes with identical (often mispelled) keys appear in groups on the same day, spread across the whole country, always from some new account with the company name as user name.

Contacting these accounts never works - I tried several times.

And in this particular case the aerial image clearly shows that there is no such business here - it's in the middle of a baseball field.
Geo-Tobi (2024-09-09 12:31:18+00:00): Hier wurde agricultural=yes gesetzt. War das beabsichtigt oder war "Landwirtschaftl. Verkehr frei" gemeint? Das wäre Access=agricultural.

agricultural=yes ist "Traktor frei". Nicht unmöglich, aber unwahrscheinlich.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/32907861/
Nakaner (2024-09-09 20:38:00+00:00): Hallo,

vielen Dank für den Hinweis. Ich habe meine Fotos von damals herausgesucht. Aus irgendeinem Grund habe ich den Weg unvollständig getaggt.

Die Beschilderung war am Ortsausgabn Tauberbischofsheim: DE:262[6], 1026-36 (max. 6 Tonnen, landwirtschaftlicher Verkehr frei). Ein weiteres Verkehrsverbot für Fahrzeugverkehr bestand nicht.

Ich habe das jetzt korrigiert.

Viele Grüße

Michael
Geo-Tobi (2024-09-09 21:42:40+00:00): Oh, das ist nun gänzlich anders. Interessant. 
Dennoch eine Nachfrage: bei diesem hier:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/68258921
Ist da wirklich ein "Traktor frei" Schild, so wie aktuell getagged, oder sollte das landw. Verkehr frei sein? Dann wäre es Access=agricultural 
Grüße
borovac (2024-04-10 12:55:21+00:00): Hello Delta Evas ALL,
 
Could you provide some more info regarding this junction? Looking at available sources this junction looks like a simple T restriction. What was the reason for remodeling? Were there any recent reconstructions going on there?
 
Here are the coordinates and link to the junction: 39.7985282, 21.1734184  https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/39.79850/21.17338

All best Borovac
ika-chan! (2024-05-15 03:49:57+00:00): I have reason to believe the user is quite similar to user @vitosgaming. If @Delta Evas ALL is @vitosgaming, then the user is evading the block and the Greek community may considering asking the DWG to ban the user until they can show that they will not continue adding imaginary data to the map.
borovac (2024-05-15 05:55:00+00:00): @ika-chan! should I fix the geometry of the intersection according to the imagery? Or will the Greek community solve it?
We came across several such examples from this @Delda Evas ALL user where a regular T intersection is modeled like this.
borovac (2024-05-15 06:04:36+00:00): @ika-chan sorry, I see now that you have already fixed the intersection.
sirorezka (2024-02-19 13:13:19+00:00): Здравствуйте, вы отрисовали полигон здания под другим зданием. не закралось ли какой-то ошибки в вашей правке?
literan (2024-02-21 20:38:46+00:00): Откат
Михаил 1995 (2024-03-01 11:52:19+00:00): Здравствуйте. да, конечно, ошибка, согласен. буду внимательнее
Supaplex (2024-02-19 08:32:24+00:00): 道路線段可以切割，不必全部刪除重畫