piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
silversurfer83 (2026-04-02 16:52:32+00:00): Ich sehe das hier so, dass der Parkplatz zum Wildpark gehört. So lange dort kein Schild mit dem Wanderparkplatzsymbol zu sehen ist hat der Ausdruck in name=* eben nichts verloren. 
Auf der von dir angegebenen Seite sind die Touren einiger Rundwanderwege aufgelistet. Dort steht nur, dass die Touren "an Parkplätzen" beginnen. Wenn ich bei einem Parkplatz eine Website sehe, dann erwarte ich beim Klick auf den Link, dass ich zur Seite des Betreibers mit Informationen zu ganz genau diesem einen Parkplatz geführt werde. Also ist auch der aktuelle Link falsch. 

Wer betreibt den Parkplatz? Was ist nachprüfbar beschildert? 

Wenn du dies nicht beantworten kannst trag bitte auch keine Internetadressen von Wandervereinen ein, die den Parkplatz einfach nur als Startpunkt für ihre Touren nutzen.
Niederpruem (2026-04-02 17:05:43+00:00): Bitte denke daran, das in den Wandervereinen Menschen sind, die schon etwas älter sind und nicht ein Faible dafür haben, eine perfekte Internet-Präsenz aufzubauen. Ich habe aber deinen Kommentar zur Kenntnis genommen.
eggie (2026-03-30 13:46:04+00:00): Dag Kneon. Je hebt een boom op een kruispunt gezet...  De tag voor een zwembad is leisure=sports_centre met sport=swimming. 
Zie https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180623363#17/51.98038/5.74062
Ik draai deze bijdrage weer terug.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-03-30 13:49:45+00:00): reverted by changeset #180631306

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dswimming

swimming_pool is de bak met water zelf.. niet de instelling.
NieWnen (2026-04-02 15:54:05+00:00): Czym jest teraz Kurnik?
Bo tagi miejsca kultury zostały usunięte w tej zmianie a nazwa została.
Ben Dezar (2026-04-03 08:39:12+00:00): Otóż to zwykły budynek szkolny, gdzie odbywają się zajęcia. Żadnego miejsca kultury tam nie ma. Nadal mówi się na ten budynek „Kurnik”.
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-30 13:05:37+00:00): Hi, thanks for your contribution!

I noticed that the name was changed from "Супермаркет "Літа"" to "Супермаркет "Thrash"". This seems like a significant change.

See https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4666120289

Could you please provide some additional context to confirm that this is the correct and current name?
Brallix (2026-03-30 19:38:03+00:00): Вітю! Супермаркет "Літа" вже дуже давно закрився та на його місці відкрився інший  супермаркет - "Thrash".

The "Lita" supermarket closed a long time ago, and another supermarket, "Thrash," has opened in its place.
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-30 20:42:54+00:00): Ok. Thanks for your reply.
eggie (2026-03-30 13:40:18+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback   Wanneer het een zone betreft dan extra bijtaggen. zone:maxspeed=NL:30

Zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:zone:maxspeed
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
MrLocalFixer (2026-06-06 19:20:04+00:00): seems like you tried to find the towers but failed to locate some, Nice try. I am also finding those towers.

(Anandpur sahib sub station)
MrLocalFixer (2026-06-06 20:13:41+00:00): Done, added that transmission link successfully. almost all towers has been identified in that line.
yelisey90 (2026-03-30 17:59:23+00:00): reverted — the property location is definitely wrong, please find out the exact location before adding in to the map
yelisey90 (2026-03-30 17:59:26+00:00): reverted — the property location is definitely wrong, please find out the exact location before adding in to the map
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-30 13:07:05+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180626306
NeisBot (2026-03-30 11:18:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/7063767283 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Estacion de recarga electrica"
---
Por ejemplo, una versión más neutral y objetiva de tu texto podría ser: "Estación de recarga eléctrica"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-04-07 16:33:12+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/181009618
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
Enock4seth (2026-04-28 06:58:45+00:00): Hi ColumbiaPlateau, kindly avoid adding barrier=block on roads under construction in Ghana, most roads under construction are still opened to traffic, any barrier is temporal, these barriers will stay in OpenStreetMap forever if you will personally not revisit them. Thank you.
ColumbiaPlateau (2026-04-29 14:47:11+00:00): Hello Enock4seth, 
I see that you removed the barrier=block (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13684819717) already. Thank you for the insight and happy mapping!
yelisey90 (2026-03-30 17:59:28+00:00): reverted — the property location is definitely wrong, please find out the exact location before adding in to the map
IKAKO013 (2026-04-14 16:43:29+00:00): How it can be wrong? What a nonsense!
This is my apartment. I hape added 3 apartmens. 2 in tbilisi and one bakuriani. 
You th8nk i d9nt know the lcation of my apartment?
yelisey90 (2026-04-14 17:46:01+00:00): Replied to private message
Layft Greater (2026-03-30 11:32:27+00:00): also node 5761548494
Wildsharky (2026-04-01 12:41:34+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:180656076
NeisBot (2026-03-30 11:56:15+00:00): 🌍 Welcome to OSM, Huai Shao.
Thanks for contributing!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

✅ Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added houses"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-30 13:07:11+00:00): Revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180624499
jayaddison (2026-03-30 12:32:01+00:00): Thank you!
NeisBot (2026-03-30 12:18:39+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 45 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/687294976 v5 | 16 crossings
https://osm.org/way/906180021 v4 | 13 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1012203053 v2 | 9 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/6442251965 v4
https://osm.org/node/9338516494 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180627206
bartgron (2026-03-30 12:32:29+00:00): Zestaw zmian został wycofany z powodu błędów.
Pozdrawiam
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-30 12:50:42+00:00): Thanks @bartgron

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180627948
literan (2026-03-30 18:53:40+00:00): Салон красоты это не название

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Названия#Имя_–_это_название_и_только

текст с вывески можно заносить в тег inscription
iandees (2026-03-30 13:40:55+00:00): Hi! It looks like the website URL on node/10798781988 may have been copied from Google Maps (it contained Google tracking parameters). Please be careful not to copy information from Google into OpenStreetMap, as Google's data is copyrighted.
u0_a203 (2026-03-30 14:40:42+00:00): I completely understand, I will correct it.
TinPetreković (2026-04-05 10:30:00+00:00): Segments that were split unnecessarily have been merged back together in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180889728
flohoff (2026-03-30 13:34:22+00:00): Hi,
ich habe hier soeben die changesets gesehen.

Z260 ist Verbot von Kraftfahrtzeugen aller art - Mit Z1020-30 ist das dann "Anlieger frei"

Das wird bei osm zu "motor_vehicle=destination" nicht access=destination.

Dann muss man auch nicht die Brechstange mit "foot=yes/bicycle=yes" noch hinterher werfen.

Und woher kommt das horse=no? Sind die da explizit verboten? 

Flo
StadtSelm (2026-03-30 13:42:27+00:00): Richtig, Verbot für KFZ aller Art und Richtig + Anlieger frei. Genauso wie es dort eingestellt worden ist. 

Das Dropdown gibt nun einmal her, dass man auch Fuß- und Radverkehr und auch Pferde einzeln auswählen kann. Warum nicht dann auch nutzen? Zudem müssen Pferde nicht explizit verboten sondern explizit erlaubt werden (s. VwV-StVO). Hat also nichts mit der Brechstange zu tun. Trotzdem Danke für den Hinweis. Waren die ersten Eintragungen in OSM.
flohoff (2026-03-30 13:55:57+00:00): Z260 + 1020-30 ist

motor_vehicle=destination

nicht access=no + foot=yes/bicycle=yes

Es ist falsch getagged.

Und das horse=no - Wir taggen nur dinge die Tatsächlich verboten sind. 

Gibt es dort ein explizites Schild das Pferde verboten sind?

Wir taggen ja nur das was wirklich vor Ort sichtbar ist für jedermann.

Also müsste hier überall ein Z257-51 stehen - ist das so?

Ansonsten dürfen Pferde/Reiter natürlich am Straßenverkehr teilnehmen.

Flo
StadtSelm (2026-03-31 05:55:57+00:00): Vielen Dank für den Hinweis wie in OSM richtig getaggt wird. Wird korrigiert.
Lisapple (2026-04-20 16:59:41+00:00): Merci pour les ajouts sur les maisons du don (et la mise à jour du wiki), mais il faut être très vigilant sur le positionnement. L'ancienne position de La Rochelle était correcte, et non la nouvelle (je l'ai donc remise à sa place).
Aussi, il est grandement préférable de mettre à jour les éléments existants plutôt que de les supprimer pour les rajouter, cela permet de garder l'historique des modifications.
Cordialement.
quincylvania (2026-04-03 13:15:44+00:00): Hi kaleidoscopica, just a heads up that I changed this to leisure=nature_reserve, which is consistent with how large protected areas like this are tagged in OSM. The tag leisure=park is generally for smaller urban parks with highly developed recreation infrastructure.
kaleidoscopica (2026-04-03 14:40:28+00:00): Ahh! This was actually more of a mistake than that, as I didn't see the leisure=nature_reserve tag there at all when glancing over all the tags, and thought I was simply adding the leisure=park tag, rather than replacing leisure=nature_reserve. But I also didn't realize that nature_reserve was more appropriate in this case anyway, so I've learned on both fronts. Thank you!
quincylvania (2026-04-03 16:08:22+00:00): No worries at all! This is a very common source of confusion in OSM since a lot of things called parks shouldn't really be tagged as parks.
karr4s (2026-04-06 16:57:47+00:00): Petite erreur dans le SIRET de "MECS GAP Le Gîte" : le SIRET renseigné est celui du siège social (43383327400031) et non celui de l'établissement situé Rue Salvador Allende (43383327400056).

Il y a 4 autres endroits avec ce SIRET à Lille : je vais les corriger de suite. ;)
eggie (2026-03-30 13:41:46+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Norbert Dichter (2026-03-30 21:13:34+00:00): Hello, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. Thank you for your contribution. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. Or just hit the Q-key.
Also please keep in mind: many buildings are very close but do not actually touch each other, try to map them close to each other without letting them connect or share nodes with each other, roads, or residential area outlines. In the iD web editor, holding down the "alt" key will keep nodes from "snapping" to each other and accidentally connecting.  Thanks so much for your contribution, Norbert 'Nodi' Dichter, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180628935
AurélienQ (2026-03-31 18:35:30+00:00): Hello,

Je suis pas convaincu du changement de la bretelle en route primaire (229971984 ; 1076635366). Qu'est ce qui a motivé ce changement ?

Bonne soirée,
Aurélien
MacDony (2026-04-01 06:48:44+00:00): Bonjour Aurélien,
J'utilise ID en ligne pour l'édition et je n'ai pas de lien vers le segment concerné dans ton message.
Denis
AurélienQ (2026-04-01 20:15:56+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/229971984/
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1076635366/
MacDony (2026-04-02 05:54:46+00:00): Bonjour Aurélien,
Merci pour les liens
J'ai fais ce changement car il y a une habitation au N°127 de cette rue et que la Bretelle d'entrée se situe juste après.
Il est vrai que j'avais oublié de couper la première partie de la bretelle d'entrée au niveau de la route qui mêne à cette habitation
Je viens de corriger
Denis
AurélienQ (2026-04-02 08:07:59+00:00): Bonjour Mac, 
Je vois ce que tu veux dire et je valide ton observation 👍

Bonne journée !
eggie (2026-03-30 13:52:38+00:00): Dag  Knilessew, 
Hoe komen de bewoners dan bij hun woning?

MVG
eggie
Knilessew (2026-03-30 14:05:28+00:00): Op dit moment noodwegen. Zodra de parallelwegen er zijn zal ik het aanpassen. Echter is afslaan niet meer mogelijk en risico ivm greppel naast de hoofdweg. Nb.. ik woon daar zelf.
eggie (2026-03-30 14:08:34+00:00): Ahh.. oke...
Bedankt voor de aanpassing.
Gr eggie
Wildsharky (2026-04-01 12:53:03+00:00): Revert of 180609593
demon_box (2026-03-31 07:10:55+00:00): Ciao MassiveBox, ti segnalo che in Italia il civico identifica il punto di accesso (entrata) e NON l'intero edificio. Infatti un edificio può avere più entrate e di conseguenza più numeri civici. 
Quindi hai 2 opzioni: 
1. Se conosci esattamente la posizione (entrata) del civico che stai mappando metti tutti i tags dell'indirizzo su un nodo del perimetro dell'edificio (aggiungendo anche il tag entrance sullo stesso nodo);
2. Se invece non hai questa informazione così precisa devi mettere tutti i tags dell'indirizzo su nodo adiacente ma STACCATO dal poligono dell'edificio.
Infine se vuoi indicare 2 civici su un unico nodo il valore di addr:housenumber è errato "14, 16" ma devi usare questa sintassi "14;16" o meglio ancora fare 2 nodi separati ;-)
Ho già proceduto con le correzioni del caso. 
Grazie e BuonMapping!
rempshaener (2026-03-30 17:38:22+00:00): Hallo,
es gibt kein Taggingschema für Verkehrsschilder die nur dann gelten, wenn Ampeln ausfallen.
Insofern sind die Doppelungen Fußgängerampel/Vorfahrt-Achten nicht richtig.
Viele Grüße
Michi_10 (2026-03-31 08:43:11+00:00): Hi,
danke für deine Rückmeldung. Ich hätte gedacht, dass die vor Ort vorhandenen Schilder auch gemappt werden müssen, aber da die Wirkung schon durch die Ampeln geregelt wird, scheinen die Noden nicht nötig zu sein. Ich habe nun die betroffenen Noden entfernt, jetzt sollte alles passen.
Viele Grüße
John Kastner (2026-03-31 02:08:35+00:00): I think something went wrong with this changeset. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1165750330 is deleted

See also https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180628125 which seems to touch the same buildings
M-NCPPC_Import (2026-03-31 12:18:11+00:00): Thank you for this comment, John! I will investigate, revert if needed, and bring back these accidentally deleted buildings.
yelisey90 (2026-03-30 17:56:39+00:00): reverted - it's not separate from the street

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180641748
BroharrisCanal (2026-03-31 10:24:58+00:00): Hi yelisey90,
Thank you for reviewing this, I will keep that in mind next time.
Wildsharky (2026-04-01 12:53:47+00:00): Revert of 180615066
Adikso (2026-03-30 16:19:16+00:00): Is this built already or is it in construction? Are you sure that it is this big and of this shape? It's like 8000m2.
Agnieszka Grabowicz (2026-03-30 16:41:08+00:00): It's built and I need to update the address to receive deliveries. No, it's not on all of the land; it's 85 m2. But the whole of the land is now under one owner
Adikso (2026-03-31 00:29:03+00:00): I removed the building and replaced it with an address point with corrected address format. You can add an actual building shape once you are able to draw it on the map more or less accurately.
silversurfer83 (2026-03-30 19:26:49+00:00): Gude Stefan,

landuse=grassland beschreibt idR naturbelassene Graslandschaften. Wird diese Fläche regelmäßig gemäht? Dann eher landuse=meadow oder landcover=grass

Die Lärmmessstelle könnte eine man_made=monitoring_station sein, oder?

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180631606
NeisAgent (2026-03-30 16:33:24+00:00): 🕵 The changeset tags appear to reference Google as a data source.

Please note that using Google Maps, Google Street View, or similar Google services as a mapping source is not allowed in OpenStreetMap due to license restrictions.

More information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google

If the data in this changeset was derived from Google or another incompatible source, the edits may need to be reverted.

If this is a misunderstanding and the data was collected from permitted sources (e.g. local survey, Bing imagery, local knowledge, etc.), please clarify in a reply.
TrickyFoxy (2026-03-30 14:33:23+00:00): TODO: удалить и перерисовать
TrickyFoxy (2026-04-15 19:40:39+00:00): удалено
acubens71 (2026-04-04 16:18:23+00:00): Bonjour,
Attention au surdétaillage du landuse :

- Il ne faut pas cartographier les arbres individuels comme des bois, mais juste comme des arbres (natural=tree), car un seul arbre ne suffit pas à former ne serait-ce qu'un bosquet.

- Par ailleurs la canopée des arbres a tendance a pas mal déborder sur les terrains alentours, donc il faut essayer de ne pas trop la décalquer quand on trace sur imagerie aérienne, au risque de encore une fois créer des détails qui n'existent pas sur le terrain.

Cordialement,
Gen_Gavi (2026-04-04 17:44:33+00:00): Bonsoir,

Je comprends, désolée...
Pour les arbres, j'étais partie du constat que beaucoup d'entre, même isolés, eux poussent en bouquets de trois ou plus.  ;)

Merci pour ces conseils que je vais désormais suivre au mieux. ^^

Bonne soirée
Geneviève
acubens71 (2026-04-05 00:14:31+00:00): Re,
Pas de soucis, à vrai dire je me permets de dire cela car ça m'est moi-même arrivé quand j'ai commencé a contribuer sur OSM (ça commence à dater..) et au fil des mises a jour d'imagerie aérienne j'ai pu constater à quel point il pouvait des décalages en fait.. !

Bonnes contributions ! 
Romuald
Gen_Gavi (2026-04-06 06:55:17+00:00): L'expérience des plus aguerris est précieuse. ;)
Merci.
statelyelms (2026-03-30 14:24:12+00:00): Yes, in technical terms the entirety of Grand Manan is one village, however this is just an administrative definition and they don't share an island-wide urban framework, so should be tagged as their distinct counterparts (hamlets and villages) and not suburbs and quartiers, which are reserved for parts of a contiguous settlement with distinct character.
statelyelms (2026-03-30 14:26:21+00:00): I'm pretty confident about this (and it aligns with openstreetmap philosophy to map the reality, not the legal definitions, eg. places in Alberta not legally cities but hundreds of thousands strong as tagged place=city) but of course feedback is always welcome
arjunaraoc (2026-04-05 13:02:41+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180633611
felipeeugenio (2026-03-30 16:23:40+00:00): Hola. Los edificios puedes cuadrarlos con la letra Q.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180633620
silversurfer83 (2026-03-30 19:24:45+00:00): Hi :)

sind die Öffnungszeiten identisch geblieben?

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180633909
bresomch (2026-03-31 15:37:19+00:00): Hallo silversurfer83

Die Öffnungszeiten haben sich geändert.
Aber erst  war die auf der Webseite angegebene Zeit am Donnerstag (17:00 bis 17:00 Uhr) nicht plausibel.
In der Zwischenzeit habe ich die Öffnungszeiten nach E-Mail-Korrespondenz mit Restaurant angepasst.

Grüße
bresomch
silversurfer83 (2026-03-31 16:36:35+00:00): Danke :)
tomhukins (2026-04-09 13:52:09+00:00): As ever, thank you for your good work improving the map.

Please use helpful changeset descriptions to help reviewers understand your work.  The one word "farm" is not enough.

I have mentioned this before at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173146640, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174989190, and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174989830.

You have not responded to my previous comments asking for more helpful descriptions and continue this bad habit.  Can you explain why?
iandees (2026-03-30 16:17:49+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6469908246 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180637816, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
mueschel (2026-04-02 10:29:00+00:00): Hi,
It seems you're using the suffix "both" in a non-standard way here. 

':both' means that the feature exists both on the left and the right side of a way (like a sidewalk). 
I guess you want to say that the signal applies to forward and backward directions?  That would be 
railway:signal:direction=both
HaPe-CZ (2026-04-02 11:11:38+00:00): Hi, that's right, this signal is the same for both directions of travel.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-07-14 12:47:29+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4560920853/history

why you changed power-tower to aerialway=pylon ?
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-30 20:44:14+00:00): And again, names_deleted":"[name:ar, name:hy, name:ka, name:fa, name:ml, name:sr, name:ru, name:bg]" @ https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/255812771
stillhart (2026-04-28 20:40:04+00:00): Is this 16 or 8 charger ports? Tesla website shows 8, but that might be wrong :-)
MarcoR (2026-04-29 05:42:25+00:00): Thank you for asking!
There are 8 stalls (columns/charge points); for other brands usually each dispenser has 2 sockets/cables and can charge up to 2 vehicles simultaneously, so I assumed the same applied to Tesla's;  was I wrong? :O
stillhart (2026-04-29 06:27:48+00:00): Yes, for Tesla it's one "charging_point" per vehicle. If you are local, you could map each man_made=charge_point separate and the area as a amenity=charging_station :)

The very old tesla charger had two cables, but only one was usable at a time and they had different plugs.
MarcoR (2026-04-30 03:17:28+00:00): Thanks for the info!
Yeas I'm definitely a local mapper here :)

I've tried to map each charging point with the charging_station area enclosing all of them; feel free to improve anything you like.

Happy mapping,
Marco
conifermapper (2026-04-19 07:11:51+00:00): Quina vergonha i va un autre tròç de cultura e patrimòni occitans…
conifermapper (2026-04-19 12:39:57+00:00): amagament intencional se poiriá dire. Se rend quitament pas sus cap de calc de mapa! De segur que podriam al mens estilizar de noms coma FR/OC amb lo francés primièr dins una etiqueta de nom...