piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-23 20:49:42+00:00): The level tag should only be used on actual building areas. Standalone nodes outside buildings are not valid. Please follow OSM building guidelines. Awaiting DWG review.
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-23 20:50:24+00:00): The level tag should only be used on actual building areas. Standalone nodes outside buildings are not valid. Please follow OSM building guidelines. Awaiting DWG review.
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-23 20:51:09+00:00): The level tag should only be used on actual building areas. Standalone nodes outside buildings are not valid. Please follow OSM building guidelines. Awaiting DWG review.
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-23 20:10:25+00:00): The level tag should only be used on actual building areas. Standalone nodes outside buildings are not valid. Please follow OSM building guidelines. Awaiting DWG review.
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-23 19:58:22+00:00): The operator tag should reflect the official full name as displayed. Please avoid shortening personal names.
Filip009 (2026-02-25 09:50:48+00:00): Alternatívny názov jaskyne je "A cave is not a garbage dump"?
čaro (2026-02-26 12:54:31+00:00): Nie, došlo k omylu na mojej strane,
Čaro
bielebog (2026-03-09 11:54:24+00:00): Der Import hat da schon Gebäude, von denen vor Ort noch nichts zu sehen ist. Mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179580486 hab ich das mal der Realität angepasst.
flohoff (2026-03-09 12:16:17+00:00): Die sind im ALKIS drin d.h. eingemessen. Und die sind nicht in der realität existent?
bielebog (2026-03-09 12:21:25+00:00): So sah's da letzten April aus, Blick nach Süden:
https://kartaview.org/map/@51.720249469873295,8.7351020541862,15z
Die Fläche zur Rechten, zwischen Dr. Margit-Naarmann-Straße und Erzberger Straße ist weiterhin unbebaute Brache ohne Baustelle.
bielebog (2026-03-09 12:26:24+00:00): War ein doofer Link, der ist besser: https://kartaview.org/details/10920361/94/track-info
NeisBot (2026-02-23 17:36:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13593383268 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Alquiler de autocaravanas"
---
Например, более нейтральная и фактическая версия вашего текста могла бы быть: "Аренда автодомов"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-03-04 05:33:02+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/178959205
eggie (2026-02-23 20:37:38+00:00): Vraagje voor het forum.
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/korte-vragen-met-hopelijk-een-kort-antwoord/127479/340
molensteen (2026-02-26 22:52:06+00:00): dank voor de tip eggie
Patryk2710 (2026-02-23 19:20:06+00:00): Hej! Ten AED w domu chyba jest w złej lokalizacji
bartgron (2026-02-23 19:39:57+00:00): Ten przy wejściu do świetlicy też jest nie w tej lokalizacji co trzeba na mapie
Kapikapi1975 (2026-03-02 10:40:20+00:00): Witam. Próbuję i nie bardzo wiem jak to skorygować.
pwbriggs (2026-02-25 19:56:08+00:00): Thanks. We can tag diet:vegan=*, so I've set this to diet:vegan=yes. But if this bakery offers exclusively (or nearly exclusively) vegan products, and no non-vegan foods, we could tag it more precisely as diet:vegan=only. Are you familiar with the options offered at this store?

Happy mapping!
JamesonTC (2026-02-25 19:58:54+00:00): Hello!

The bakery has mostly all vegan options, but some with milk and honey, so the Only tag would not be applicable. 

Thank you!
pwbriggs (2026-02-28 06:18:24+00:00): Awesome, thanks for confirming!
NeisBot (2026-02-23 18:00:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13593454982 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Cleaning services building"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-04 05:33:10+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179332517
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-17 01:45:49+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with advertising/malformed tags and explicit source=* of Google Maps, which is not allowed by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ), in changeset 184205172

https://osm.org/changeset/184205172
007Transformer (2026-02-24 08:24:08+00:00): Reverted in changeset id: 178975895
YomanNH (2026-02-24 10:08:28+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/219273196 - na pewno widziałeś tam wczoraj drogę dla rowerów po prawej stronie? Jeśli tak, to obecnie zmapowany chodnik wymaga poprawy.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-25 12:08:48+00:00): oj, coś mi się pomerdało

poprawiłem, dzięki za zauważenie
felipeeugenio (2026-02-23 21:23:01+00:00): Hola. Gracias por la adición. Esto está terminado o en construcción?
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178956918
Muhmaker (2026-02-25 12:36:26+00:00): Hi, mir ist aufgefallen, dass dein zzbuildings-Tool hier die Adresse vom Gebäude Gökenfeld 12 gefressen hat. Da die anderen Adressen in der Reihe nicht betroffen sind, vermute ich mal dass es sich um eine unglückliche Bedienung und nicht um ein systematisches Problem handelt. Ich habe keine Vorstellung davon wie aufwändig das wäre aber ist es vielleicht möglich eine weitere Prüfung auf bestehende Adress-tags einzubauen bevor Gebäude fusioniert werden?
flohoff (2026-02-25 21:23:03+00:00): Das tool selber macht mit Addressen gar nichts. Normalerweise selektiert man ja ein Gebäude - und updated dann das outline aus dem ALKIS. Bestehende Tags werden einfach übernommen.

Was passieren kann ist das man den outline aus versehen löscht und dann neu übernimmt, dann ist die addresse weg. (Und auch alle anderen tags wie roof/shape/levels etc)

Also das hier ist einfach ein bedienerfehler meinerseits vermute ich.

Flo
flohoff (2026-02-25 21:24:12+00:00): Spannend. Hier hab ich mal gerade in die historie geguckt. Das outline hatte nie eine addresse seit Version 1.

Waren die vielleicht hier auf nodes und ich habe den vergessen zu mergen oder so?

Na egal - ich trage die mal nach.


Flo
Filip009 (2026-02-25 09:50:07+00:00): Zdravím, neviem, či je to najšťastnejšie tagovanie pre barrier https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:barrier A zároveň, či je daná jaskyňa aj kanálovým poklopom https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dmanhole.
jayaddison (2026-03-10 23:05:29+00:00): Dankjewel
Hb- (2026-03-12 08:20:41+00:00): Die addr:housenumber soll die postalische Hausnummer enthalten, sonst gibt's Fehlermeldungen: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=addresses&lon=10.56390&lat=52.31478&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=1.00&overlays=buildings%2Cbuildings_with_addresses%2Cpostal_code%2Centrances_deprecated%2Centrances%2Cno_addr_street%2Cstreet_not_found%2Cplace_not_found%2Cnodes_with_addresses_defined%2Cnodes_with_addresses_interpolated%2Cinterpolation%2Cinterpolation_errors%2Cconnection_lines%2Cnearest_points%2Cnearest_roads%2Cnearest_areas%2Caddrx_on_nonclosed_way 
Für andere Bezeichnungen, z.B. interne DLR-Gebäudenummern, kann addr:unit oder ref verwendet werden. Beispiellösung siehe node/618923108. Der Gebäudeeingang 1D ist mit dem adressierten Gebäude verbunden und wird von OSMAnd nur einmal in der Suche aufgelistet.  Schlechter schon bei Eingang 1A node/3804629194, der dort doppelt auftaucht.
michikommader (2026-03-12 13:24:34+00:00): Alles klar, danke für den Hinweis! Ich schaue mir das im Detail die kommenden Tage mal an und werde es reverten bzw. zielführend umbauen.
Hb- (2026-03-12 13:51:11+00:00): Nutzt Du OsmAnd?
michikommader (2026-03-19 21:50:29+00:00): Nee, ich nutze OsmAnd nicht.
michikommader (2026-03-19 22:05:25+00:00): Meine Intention dahinter, addr:housenumber zuzuweisen, war, dass bspw. Mapy (https://mapy.com/de/turisticka?l=0&source=osm&id=1191345276&x=10.5622991&y=52.3150148&z=18) dann die DLR-internen Gebäudenummern als "Hausnummern" rendert, was praktisch ist. Zumindest hatte ich es bei ein oder zwei Gebäuden zufällig bemerkt und mich gewundert, warum die Nummern bei den anderen nicht gerendert werden, und anschließend diesen Tag bei den anderen befüllt.

Aber ja, das ist natürlich dann nur eine mögliche Interpretation auf Mapy-Anwendungsseite und offensichtlich nicht zielführend, da fehlerverursachend.
michikommader (2026-03-22 18:37:13+00:00): @Hb-, ich habe die DLR-eigenen Gebäudenummern jetzt alle von  addr:housenumber zu addr:unit geändert. Der OSM Inspektor scheint jetzt keine Fehler mehr zu werfen, aber ist ein alleinstehendes addr:unit valide, ohne die anderen addr:*-Tags wie addr:street? Oder wird OsmAnd weiterhin Probleme haben?
Hb- (2026-03-22 18:45:48+00:00): Alleine machen die keine Probleme. Die Frage ist halt nur, ob sie auch gefunden werden. OsmAnd hat seine Eigenheiten, siehe Kommentar 1. Völlig klar ist mir das auch noch nicht.
eggie (2026-02-23 20:23:34+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-02-23 20:33:45+00:00): Dag SP  Tip Probeer de paden los te houden van de landuse. Ik he e.e.a. losgemaakt.
Geef concreet aan wat je hebt aangepast.

MVG
eggie
Glassman (2026-02-24 17:25:32+00:00): From your changeset comment, I'm not sure what you are trying to accomplish. Is there anything I can do to help?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178958250
Glassman (2026-02-24 17:25:44+00:00): From your changeset comment, I'm not sure what you are trying to accomplish. Is there anything I can do to help?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178958250
pwbriggs (2026-02-27 08:52:05+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Nathan%20Runyan is there a sign that says 15 mph here? If not, do you know if it was previously a 15-mph zone, i.e. why was it tagged as 15 mph? Please let me know!
eggie (2026-02-23 20:34:37+00:00): Tip... Probeer bij te taggen op de adresnodes zelf.
MVG
eggie
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-23 20:31:20+00:00): The level tag should only be used on actual building areas. Standalone nodes outside buildings are not valid. Please follow OSM building guidelines. Awaiting DWG review.
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-23 20:23:30+00:00): The level tag should only be used on actual building areas. Standalone nodes outside buildings are not valid. Please follow OSM building guidelines. Awaiting DWG review.
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-23 20:28:54+00:00): The level tag should only be used on actual building areas. Standalone nodes outside buildings are not valid. Please follow OSM building guidelines. Awaiting DWG review.
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-23 20:27:13+00:00): The level tag should only be used on actual building areas. Standalone nodes outside buildings are not valid. Please follow OSM building guidelines. Awaiting DWG review.
gscholz (2026-02-26 08:03:46+00:00): Hi Lisapple,
your recent edits have left behind a lot of errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-0.91237&lat=45.89721&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges

As you may know this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps.

Can you please fix this?

As you are using JOSM, you can use the internal validator to avoid uploading such errors:

osm.wiki/JOSM/Validator

Kind regards
Guido
NeisBot (2026-02-23 19:51:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/1055436053 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Auto window tinting shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-04 05:33:10+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179332518
(No visible changes after review)
eggie (2026-02-23 20:25:53+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback.. Je info heb ik samengeviegd met de bestaande adresnode.

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
NeisBot (2026-02-23 19:57:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/269474377 v5

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "BBQ restaurant"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-04 05:33:10+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179332519
(No visible changes after review)
NeisBot (2026-02-23 20:00:46+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/1252132566 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Psychiatry clinic"
---
Например, более нейтральная и фактическая версия вашего текста могла бы быть: "Психиатрическая клиника"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-03-04 05:33:11+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/178979048
NeisBot (2026-02-23 20:00:48+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13577696264 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Flooring store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-04 05:33:12+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179332520
(No visible changes after review)
NeisBot (2026-02-23 20:03:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13329062538 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Coin store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-04 05:33:12+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179332521
(No visible changes after review)
A67-A67 (2026-02-23 20:16:07+00:00): In deze wijziging gaan de tags local_ref van de haltesnodes verloren, verdwijnen de haltenodes uit de busroutes en wordt het perron als voetgangersgebied getagd en de rand van het perron als perron...

Het was allemaal correct getagd en dat heeft veel werk gekost. Waarom moet dit nu weer?
A67-A67 (2026-02-23 20:21:23+00:00): Ik heb de haltenodes hersteld. De aan het perron vastgeplakte ways heb ik laten staan.
IIVQ (2026-02-23 21:13:31+00:00): Excuses, ik wist niet dat local_ref de perronletter was, ik dacht dat ref die taak had. 

Voor wat betreft de haltenodes die in de route_relatie horen... Dat blijf jij maar beweren, maar m.i. horen de platform (dat is de perronrand) en evt de stop_position in de routerelatie. De haltepaal (die we alleen voor de rendering op de standaard-kaartlaag taggen met highway=bus_stop) hoeft niet in de routerelatie.
A67-A67 (2026-02-23 21:24:16+00:00): Tja, je bent de enige die de perronrand als perron (platform) interpreteert. Ook op het forum ben je de enige met dat standpunt. 

De haltenode is het primaire object dat de bushalte voorstelt. Iedereen in Nederland voegt de haltenode toe aan busroutes, behalve jij.

Daarom het verzoek om geen haltenodes te verwijderen uit busrouterelaties.
IIVQ (2026-02-23 21:32:17+00:00): Daar ga ik niet in mee. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178960021 hier hebben we wat ik beschrijf als concensus bereikt. Dat jij daar niet in mee wil gaan betekent niet dat dat de concensus is. Als je daar wat aan wil doen moeten we die discussie overdoen, maar dan op het forum.
IIVQ (2026-02-23 21:36:23+00:00): Van https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:public_transport%3Dplatform

Regel 1: "Use public_transport=platform to identify the places where passengers board or alight from public transport of any type", kortom de plek waar mensen in- of uitstappen.

Onder "How to map": "The platform can be mapped as a node way or area. Nodes are used for locations where there is no physical infrastructure (for example a customary bus stop without infrastructure or with a pole), a way is used for a location where a linear area is allocated for people using public transport, and an area is used when a more expansive size is allocated or where different platforms adjoin, such as at in a railway station.". Kortom: als er een perronrand is, zet je public_transport=platform op de halterand.
Als er geen perron is, dán doe je het op de haltepaal.

Dat heb ik niet gezegd, dat is de internationale concensus.

Volgens mij ben jij de gene hier die het anders doet.
A67-A67 (2026-02-23 21:45:01+00:00): Daar staat toch ook letterlijk dat het perron een area kan zijn? En een area is preciezer dan een way om een gebied aan te geven.

We hebben hierover ook een lang topic op het forum, en daar zijn vrijwel alle mappers het met je oneens als je de haltenodes naar iets secundairs degradeert en perronranden als perron mapt.

Daarnaast zie je toch overal in Nederland dat er niet op jouw manier gemapt wordt? Alle bushaltes die op jouw manier zijn gemapt, zijn door jezelf gemapt. 

We zitten in OSM met een situatie dat PTv1 en PTv2 naast elkaar bestaan en dat daardoor de tekortkomingen van PTv2 (bijv. het ontbreken van een object dat de halte voorstelt) niet opgelost worden. De pagina die je aanhaalt gaat alleen over het PTv2-schema.
VictorIE (2026-02-26 18:13:45+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6382992972/

There are several tags in the style of 
monitoring:#*=*

Some services, e.g. Overpass-Turbo have issues with certain characters in the key. It seems happy enough to have them in the value.
GeoConor (2026-02-26 18:29:27+00:00): Cool. I can't remember if I had created these custom or picked the tags!  Will I remove the special characters? 

:-)

C.
NeisBot (2026-02-23 20:18:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13298190596 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Craft store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-04 05:33:12+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179332522
(No visible changes after review)
NeisBot (2026-02-23 20:21:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13593752830 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Electro shop"
---
Například více neutrální a faktická verze tvého textu by mohla být: "Elektro obchod"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-04 05:33:15+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179332523
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
NeisBot (2026-02-23 20:24:47+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13556271916 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Auto repair shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-04 05:33:15+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179332525
(No visible changes after review)
Eduardo17172 (2026-02-23 21:07:41+00:00): Hola, me parece q esta bien solo q no lo queria agregar porque no estaba seguro del tag building:units ya q parece q es principalmente para edificios residenciales o similares. Hay q corregir las direcciones de la Iglesia San Agustín y su convento, ya que la iglesia esta ubicada en Cantournet (no en prat q comienza a partir de cienfuegos hacia el poniente) y al convento le falta el numero. Esto ultimo acerca de las direcciones es según el mapa de SII
felipeeugenio (2026-02-23 21:42:01+00:00): ok, y cual es la dirección?
felipeeugenio (2026-02-23 21:43:08+00:00): Es la misma dirección de la Iglesia? el monasterio aparece separado.
Eduardo17172 (2026-02-23 23:45:21+00:00): Son edificios diferentes, que lo más probable es que este unidos mediante esos patios que se ven. La dirección de la Iglesia es Cantournet 705 mientras que el Monasterio según SII Cienfuegos 410-450 aunque parece que hay direcciones entre medio de los locales comerciales como la joyería rolex q tiene el 420.  Un detalle que puede confundir es que el numero de la iglesia esta justo en la puerta del convento que da a la plaza... y quizás este allí porque esta fue incendiada antiguamente