piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
julcnx (2025-03-20 02:03:46+00:00): Hi Ropino, thanks for your contributions! Based on your profile, I assume this change wasn't based on a ground survey? Just a heads-up—`highway=road` can be used for segments that haven't been confirmed with local knowledge (e.g., mapped from imagery alone). This tag can represent anything from a narrow footpath to a motorway and is generally ignored by routers, so connectivity shouldn't be a concern. More details here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Droad#Roads_added_without_local_knowledge
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163835461
felipeeugenio (2025-03-20 12:37:36+00:00): Hola. Buenas ediciones. Eso si el uso del tag name= es un poco más sofisticado. En otra edición suya reemplace el tag name= del farmyard al que corresponde, que es place=farm + name=Estancia...
Pero ahora me topo con esta. Cuál es el mejor lugar para ubicar el nodo?
Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163835982
cambiazo (2025-03-20 16:59:22+00:00): Son ambas Estancia María Diana. Tiene dos ubicaciones.
yelisey90 (2025-03-22 17:41:39+00:00): Really, a monument? Of the size of the Arc de Triomphe or Kartlis Deda? Or one that somebody can theoretically enter into?
empty_child (2025-03-26 19:29:22+00:00): Changed to sculpture
eggie (2025-03-20 07:35:23+00:00): Dag lcfg,

Is dit serieus getagd als surface=grass?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-03-20 07:39:08+00:00): Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=163836407

Aangepast naar paving_stones
lcfg (2025-03-20 09:04:55+00:00): Verkeerd getagged, excuus.
eggie (2025-03-20 09:07:41+00:00): No problem 😀
seviper (2025-10-24 18:58:48+00:00): For https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1369375435 the segment paralleling the interstate from the bridge over the river, back to the trail, and then looping back to connect itself, does not exist. The cultivated field goes all the way up to the fence/forest line.
ion_chi (2025-10-24 20:18:48+00:00): Please delete it. It was probably a heatmap artifact
NeisReview (2025-03-20 07:11:00+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163842281
eggie (2025-03-19 21:23:42+00:00): Tgomas,

Beter niets aan die adresnodes veranderen. Ik heb je info samengevoegd met de importadresnode. Gewoon even goed zoeken.
6A is wel het pand ernaast. Dit pand heeft nr 8.
MVG
eggie
NeisReview (2025-03-20 07:11:15+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163842281
eggie (2025-03-19 21:21:06+00:00): Dag Thomas Die adresnode is er gewoon, maar vaak legt het Kadaster de verschillende adresnodes gewoon op elkaar.
Ik heb het hier aangepast.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-03-19 21:27:54+00:00): Er was al een adresnode. Ze liggen hier op elkaar. 
gr eggie
Thomas1984 (2025-03-20 09:26:42+00:00): Dankjewel voor de feedback. Ik had deze en de andere 2 adres aanpassingen gedaan omdat ik laatst(begin van mijn edits OSM) per ongeluk de adressen weg had gehaald bij het verwijderen van winkels. Fijne dag en groet, Thomas
karr4s (2025-07-10 08:41:03+00:00): Bonjour,
Le SIRET ajouté à cet établissement est erroné et a ajouté à 20 autres établissements, tous situés en Bretagne. Pouvez-vous les corriger ?

D'avance merci (et merci pour la correction d'hier, en passant).
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2025-07-10 09:37:09+00:00): Bonjour,

Merci pour l'alerte, nous avons supprimé  les Siret

Cordialement,
L'Equipe DB
eggie (2025-03-26 15:10:26+00:00): Dag Thomas. Dat adres is niet compleet.
Mvg
eggie
eggie (2025-03-26 15:58:47+00:00): excuus.. Dit klopt wel . allen de BAG data ontbreekt. maar wellicht is die er niet (meer)
Groet
eggie
felipeeugenio (2025-03-20 12:35:37+00:00): Hola. Buenas ediciones.
Un detalle. Cuando las tierras de labranza estén juntas, es decir, no separadas ni por un camino ni por una zanja, entonces pegar los polígonos.
Está bien dibujar dos polígonos por que eventualmente son dos plantaciones distintas, pero ese vacío que queda entremedio, que uno después nota que no contiene nada, es incorrecto. Ojalá me haya explicado bien.
NeisReview (2025-03-20 19:16:36+00:00): #DataImport

Hi, welcome to OSM!

With this and your latest changesets, you've added a significant number of features that appear to share similarities in their tags. Could you please let us know more about the source of your mapping activity? Is this a data import?

Looking forward to hearing from you.

Thanks!
Loyba10 (2025-03-20 19:58:01+00:00): Oh! Of course, I literally live where I added all the houses. All I do is walk around, check, record, measure (if necessary but since I am still new and learning I am just staying with the basics). Same with the church, school (I use to attend that school) and well, the new clinic next to it. If I do not know something I go there and check it. For now, I am keeping it basic, some street names I do not know so I just do not add them nor change them.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-03-19 21:40:58+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1240108539
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1240110241

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2025-03-19 21:51:26+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4915609982
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/905090791

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
rskedgell (2025-03-19 23:19:47+00:00): Has the crossing been formally closed and public right of way (Cheshunt FP 22) diverted?
niftymat (2025-03-20 09:46:38+00:00): I can't speak about any formal arrangements, but there are locked gates protecting the railway. There is the ramped footbridge to cross over.
rskedgell (2025-03-24 16:06:25+00:00): Thanks.
niftymat (2025-03-24 16:10:41+00:00): I'm new to editing so if this isn't the correct way to record such things then please say
rskedgell (2025-03-24 16:14:26+00:00): No, it's fine, what you did was absolutely correct. Hopefully the county council will update their PRoW info eventually - the current extract is from Dec 2023 ( https://osm.mathmos.net/prow/progress/herts/broxbourne/cheshunt/ )
jetbridge guy (2026-04-15 20:22:40+00:00): What did you use to find train speeds?
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-03-25 22:56:00+00:00): reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164100129
VictorIE (2025-03-27 04:51:31+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/729674443

Are the revised roads here correct? They don't seem to match the overhead imagery.
b-unicycling (2025-03-28 09:36:13+00:00): I've made some adjustments, but they are on Bing and Esri.
GA_Kevin (2025-03-20 00:19:38+00:00): Thank you so much for contributing to rural South Georgia’s map!!!!
Berdly (2025-03-20 02:28:00+00:00): You’re so very welcome! Mapping is probably one of my main pastimes nowadays, and I’m glad to see my work getting noticed!
aharvey (2025-07-18 03:22:43+00:00): This has been reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169058336

These stream pools exist, they aren't errors.
joel56dt (2025-03-20 03:29:30+00:00): Hello,
Is there a reason to separate the bus stop node from the sidewalk? I have been working to connect these all over the city.

Example:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?node=12682450949

Thanks,
Joel
nikita-skakun (2025-03-20 04:26:18+00:00): Hello,
Is there any particular reason for doing so? From what I have found so far almost universally, bus stops are mapped separately from the sidewalk.
If you have a use case for that, I would like to hear back from you.
joel56dt (2025-03-20 15:43:05+00:00): Thanks, I should have given more context right away. I have been adding a lot of details for (wheelchair) accessibility and connecting bus stops to the sidewalks is an important part of this. On the ground, many bus stops are not accessible from sidewalks (maybe they are on gravel or grass, or directly on the road). If all bus stops are mapped with their connectivity to the sidewalk, those that are disconnected from the sidewalk are more obvious in their limited accessibility. I have also been adding a description that describes the accessibility (which might be redundant). Maybe we could propose a new tag that describes this instead but I think mapping the stops as either connected or disconnected to the sidewalk is the best way. In some cases I have added a little 'pigtail' path between the sidewalk and bus stop if the stop is not directly in the middle of the sidewalk.

Some examples:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6789689735
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5833868302
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12484734231
julcnx (2025-03-20 09:23:41+00:00): Thanks a lot for your contributions! Just a friendly tip: try to keep your changes smaller, like focusing on one country at a time. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
Ukundji (2025-03-20 09:49:29+00:00): Hi julcnx!
Thank you very much for the important hint. This was of course a blunder of mine. I did not realize that I still had not uploaded some mapping in China before I changed back to my main focus of mappung in Ethiopia. Sorry for this!
lipuma (2025-03-20 11:34:13+00:00): Hi Jbensman, I see you've uploaded a lot of ways in this changeset which still contain strange tags, such as gpx:name and gpxx:DisplayColor

Just a heads up. Happy mapping!
lipuma (2025-03-20 11:34:51+00:00): Also, all of your uploaded points (nodes) contain the gpx:ele tag.
Jbensman (2025-03-20 12:18:42+00:00): I downloaded the latest hydrology for the country from the USGS site.  I open it in QGIS and export an area I want to work on as kml files, then open in Garmin Basecamp, then export the streams I want to add as gpx files, then I add them in JOSM.  I am not adding the tags.  Is it an issue I should worry about?  Should I delete the tags?  Is there a way to avoid the tags being created?  I have a really hard time figuring out JOSM.  Thanks.
lipuma (2025-03-21 16:58:09+00:00): I can't really help you with QGIS and JOSM importing as I don't have any experience with that. But it looks like mueschel has removed all of the gpx tags in this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163877197
Jbensman (2025-03-21 18:42:37+00:00): thanks, I messed with JOSM last night and saw the tags and it was easy to delete them.  I have created hundreds of ways the same way.  I went back and looked at lots of them and did not see the tags on any of them.  So not sure what is going on and will do some more testing.  But for sure I will delete the tags in JOSM from now on.
Jbensman (2025-03-23 03:43:12+00:00): I have it all figured out now and found a much faster and easier way to do it! I figured out how to export the streams as a GPX file from QGIS.  Before GPX would never work in QGIS.  But now it will import into JOSM without any extra tags.
Hufkratzer (2025-03-20 18:09:38+00:00): Hi,
es ist auf den Sat.-bildern nicht genau ersichtlich, was https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1369401935 ist, aber ich vermite, dass es auch wieder ein Reitplatz idt und keine Reitanlage (ähnliche Fälle bereits in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160463271 diskutiert).

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1369081579 ist auch ein ähnlicher Fall (vermutlich Reitplatz + Roundpen).
Cageythree (2025-03-20 18:20:23+00:00): Ohje. Ich hatte mich an die Korrektur von damals erinnert und sogar extra nochmal nachgesehen, wie es richtig war - und es mir dann offenbar prompt falsch gemerkt. 

Ich ändere es zeitnah. Danke für das erneute Aufmerksamsein.
JJIglesias (2025-03-20 16:58:09+00:00): Saludos.

Si bien el tag height=xxx es importante, para efectos de la tridimensionalidad del mapa el valor level=yyyy es tambien muy importante. si pudieras agregar ambos seria muy significativo.

Gracias
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-10 01:04:45+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17532
voltairovicz (2025-03-24 14:22:38+00:00): Hej, taka ogolna uwaga do edycji, bardziej taka wskazowka pomocna na przyszlosc, jakbys chcial rowniez dodawac nowe adresy. Jest takie narzedzie przygtowane, ktore pokazuje nowe domy i adresy i jest bardzo pomocne, mozna nawet je importowac, nie tylko przepisywac. Jak cos to lap https://budynki.openstreetmap.org.pl/#map=12.86/51.48823/20.73681
NeisRevert (2025-03-21 20:37:05+00:00): Could you please answer the questions in your commented changests? 

Thank you.
4004 (2025-03-22 23:45:01+00:00): hi, I won't be touching the wood areas, but can I ask what's up with you retagging unclassified roads to driveways?
Plaga med (2025-03-23 21:13:43+00:00): @4004 hi! I'm not sure, how I should classify some roads for now, descriptions and naming from osm are too vague for me. I just now, that this roads are used for cars in general, but when you want to drive in the Paddubje 2, roads are less solid and everyone slows down, plus there is more people walking on the road, then on the road between Paddubje 1 and 2
4004 (2025-03-24 09:38:14+00:00): Please check out the wiki page for roads eg https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=residential?uselang=en - this shows how to map them. Road type (service/ residential etc) is only used to tag how important it is, and generally these should not change. Surface is mapped with a separate tag. Pedestrians is not something that is generally mapped, but usually corresponds with a lower road type like unclassified
AmmarAzemi (2025-05-24 01:16:40+00:00): Please check tag and correct the info place
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-10 00:59:46+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164747018
NeisRevert (2025-03-21 20:28:06+00:00): #NameCheck

Hello and welcome to OSM.

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits, particularly those concerning the names you've added or modified.

Some of these names caught my attention as they are quite unique or a bit unusual. Could you please confirm if these additions were intentional or if they might have been added mistakenly?

Looking forward to your response.

Thank you!
pahlavi_temecula (2025-05-24 03:13:13+00:00): Absolute props to you
panasonic_mafia (2025-04-11 14:24:07+00:00): Fixed coords inside the brand name for https://osm.mapki.com/history/way/1111595113.
uᴉʍOꓨ (2025-04-14 03:13:50+00:00): Awesome! Thanks for fixing it.
RedGreenBlue09 (2025-03-20 05:45:35+00:00): Changes like this are wrong, useless and make maintainace harder making more segments. Please read the definition of highway link class: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_link
RedGreenBlue09 (2025-03-20 05:48:13+00:00): "A preexisting street used to connect two major highways is not a link. Instead it should be tagged as the normal highway it previously was, probably equivalent to the lower classification of the ones it connects. This also applies where otherwise minor streets connect highways at an interchange.

Similarly, a minor road that intersects a dual-carraigeway road with a higher classification is not a link between the two major road halves, and should be tagged as normal."
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-10 00:59:47+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164747018
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-07-15 17:27:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 185798781 where the changeset comment is: Reverting fiction added in error by OSMNAXA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20923
NeisBot (2025-03-20 04:30:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was flagged because your added description contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam
Allison P (2025-03-20 05:23:07+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163845164
SomeoneElse (2025-04-25 14:33:15+00:00): Is this definitely open?
Other sources suggest it may have closed late last year.
Hopefully it has reopened :)
Demi God Perseus (2025-04-25 14:48:32+00:00): Thank you for your interest hopefully as a Bitcoiner.
We have been making repair and cleaning since 30th of December 2024. It is our intention to open in maybe 2 to 3 weeks on a limited basis as we have much work to carry out on the rest of the property. Initially we intend opening 10 am to 3 pm Monday - Wednesday. 20% discount for Bitcoin payments on the Lightning network
SomeoneElse (2025-04-25 15:21:41+00:00): Best of luck, and I'm sure I'll call in once you've opened.
Today I'll have to carry on to the Cross Hills tap...
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-06 06:44:11+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164576198
user_5359 (2025-03-21 19:23:31+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please mark your address and not your sales area and use the usual keys. 
"Address": --> addr:full
"E-mail Id"--> email
"Tel No" --> phone
"URL":--> website
Your first attempt has been reset!
Константин Гам (2025-03-20 09:42:23+00:00): Исправляя название улицы, вы зачем-то её перенесли?
Улицу перенести успели за прошедшие пару недель?
Константин Гам (2025-03-20 09:43:26+00:00): Также, улицы данные закрыты со всех сторон, в честь чего их открыли? Вы это проверяли лично?
Константин Гам (2025-03-20 09:43:58+00:00): На данный момент правку откатил, так как непонятно, зачем улицы начали перемещаться. 
Приеду на место, проверю факт открытия.
Grass-snake (2025-03-20 15:17:10+00:00): Добрый вечер, я вижу Вы уже начали общаться с другим картографом, поэтому на всякий случай прокомментирую (для истории):
- в своей правке я просто изменил name с "улица Е.Котова" на "улица Евгения Котова" и добавил name:ru ( https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1292333380 ), больше ничего не трогал и не двигал;
- я не имею никакого отношения к Алекс Мок ( https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1339073147 ).

Теперь мои источники:
- При переименовании я руководствовался Постановлением от 15.05.2023 №433 (О присвоении наименований безымянным проездам в Пушкинском районе Санкт-Петербурга);
https://www.toponimika.spb.ru/vse-toponimy-spb/ofitsialnye-resheniya-o-prisvoenii-naimenovanij-obektov-na-territorii-sankt-peterburga/item/download/463_47f2187513abec53656598addb42ab69.html
- дополнительная перепроверка в ФИАС, в котором не было "улица Е.Котова", зато была "улица Евгения Котова".

Кстати, раз уж переписываюсь:
- прошу не удалять мои теги name:ru, они мне нужны (даже если они совпадают с основным name и нет названий на других языках);
- предлагаю переделать статус дороги на highway=residential;
- когда будете редактировать, обратите внимание ещё на этот отрезок дороги, пожалуйста ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1137908903 ).
Константин Гам (2025-03-20 16:20:51+00:00): я не удалял никакие теги, я просто откатил пакет. извините за беспокойство. теги вернем
Taya_S (2025-12-13 11:37:41+00:00): Heya Phoebe,

I noticed that more recent imagery has finally become available in this area.
catgirlseraid (2025-12-14 05:05:25+00:00): thanks!
cuzi (2025-05-05 16:48:02+00:00): Hi, just wanted to let you know that you accidently added "access=q" to this way: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1369515026
LievenL (2025-05-05 20:37:55+00:00): Hi, error solved; thanks for having informed me.
Baloo Uriza (2025-03-20 13:43:34+00:00): Names are only names, not also branch information.  Use branch=* for the "Oklahoma City Quail Springs" part.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163846790
Baloo Uriza (2025-03-20 13:44:03+00:00): Name and branch information incorrectly merged.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163863950
ika-chan! (2025-04-21 10:10:18+00:00): ViewStreet,

Sorry I have been having a bad day today, but the problem is that you are using service=* without realising that it will demote the importance of tracks that have the tag, as you did at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163764884 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163847110.

We do not use them on active passenger tracks.
aceman444 (2025-12-27 15:23:47+00:00): Nazvy obchodov, to je vazne toponymia. A akoze vsetky tie objekty ste navstivili, ked viete ako sa presne volaju? A napr. slova ako 'restauracia' bezne do nazvu nedavame (a ani casto nie su oficialne sucastou nazvu), je to vyjadrene typom objektu (amenity=restaurant).

Mate este dost nedoriesenych problemov v minulosti.
kmpoppe_repair (2025-04-10 11:25:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 164763734 where the changeset comment is: Reverting undiscussed mass edits to shops in Germany that add mostly incorrect addresses
kmpoppe_repair (2025-04-10 11:25:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 164763734 where the changeset comment is: Reverting undiscussed mass edits to shops in Germany that add mostly incorrect addresses
SekeRob (2025-03-21 18:49:21+00:00): Ciao

Due indirizzi con civ 127, uno ha addr:street corretto e i secondo con addr:street sbagliato.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12669508140
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12669508139

Saluti
SekeRob
Aluminum0173 (2025-03-22 07:03:21+00:00): Ciao!
Stupidi errori di distrazione, grazie mille per la segnalazione!
kmpoppe_repair (2025-04-10 11:25:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 164763734 where the changeset comment is: Reverting undiscussed mass edits to shops in Germany that add mostly incorrect addresses
kmpoppe_repair (2025-04-10 11:25:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 164763734 where the changeset comment is: Reverting undiscussed mass edits to shops in Germany that add mostly incorrect addresses
IrynaStaradub (2025-03-20 07:39:35+00:00): Bing Streetside was mentioned incorrectly. Mapillary was used for adding.
grzegorz75jan (2025-03-20 19:42:47+00:00): Drobny szczegół https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12446110260#map=19/50.041963/19.544915&layers=N loc_name=znak albo ma faktyczne lokalne znaczenie, że nawet strudzonym wędrowcom podaje się to jako punkt orientacyjny albo tag do usunięcia. Prawdopodobnie go przeoczyłeś.

Wtedy gdy wyszukiwaliśmy i usuwaliśmy zmiany pokroju tego konta to raptem parę rzeczy miało ledwo słabe oparcie w czymkolwiek.

Poczytaliśmy opisy zmian, porównali np. z orto a sam nawet dzwoniłem po jakiejś gminie i wydziałach w bodaj Krośnie robiąc z siebie głupa bo oprócz boiska nie było dalszego bajkopisarstwa.

Najpierw przeglądam ogólnie dane konto (opisy, zmiany) i w ten sposób selekcjonuję takich do jak to określasz pacyfikacji. Niektórym częściowo rokującym przez jakiś czas podsyłam informacje, pomoce naukowe. Jeżeli reagują prawidłowo to zostawiam ich w spokoju. 

Wysnuliśmy przypuszczenie, że to był okres ferii i prawdopodobnie na jakimś obozie były osoby niepełnosprawne umysłowo a wychowawcy dawali im zadanie by na mapę wprowadziły swoją wizję jakiegoś miejsca które znają. Więc malowały fikcję opartą na pewnych obiektach w terenie. Część i tak nie zobaczyli na mapie bo OSM pewnych rzeczy nie renderuje a tym bardziej źle otagowanych jak name=lampa bez reszty tagów.
Mało tego to jeden z przypadków swoimi edycjami mógł ujawnić miejsce zamieszkania (swoje czy kogoś z rodziny) a przejścia dla pieszych i ścieżki poprowadził w poprzek dwupasmowej jezdni.

Nim do kogoś strzelam to go sprawdzam.
VA00 (2025-03-22 17:53:05+00:00): Podziwiam stopień zaangażowania.