piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
muralito (2025-03-12 14:21:37+00:00): Thanks for your quick response. No need to apologize. Each part, and the whole site could be tagged, but each of them, each type of element with the respective instance type of Wikidata item. 

The reactors in OSM could be tagged with a Wikidata "instance of" "nuclear reactor", and the nuclear power stations in OSM could be tagged with a Wikidata "instance of" "nuclear power plant".

When you select which Wikidata item to "link", you need to check that it is the same type of element, not only that the label/name matches.
In some cases is more easier or direct than others.

E.g. for nuclear power plants, the class is https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q134447 which has property P1282 (Openstreetmap tag or key) = https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:plant:source=nuclear so, to map an OSM element power=plant + plant:source=nuclear, the Wikidata item you choose has to be an "instance of" "nuclear power plant" (wikidata class Q134447)
Caleb NHVR (2025-03-12 01:26:24+00:00): Will promptly revert these recent changesets as these have caused geometry issues
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-21 16:44:17+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12654201838/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
JJIglesias (2025-03-12 01:38:54+00:00): Saludos, sea lo que sea que estas tratando de hacer lo estas haciendo mal. Dos veces he borrado este cambio tuyo, por dañar data valida del mapa.

Por favor tus correcciones en general dañan el mapa, dedicate mejor a agregar al mapa mas q a corregir, pues No lo estas haciendo bien.

Si me explicas que quieres hacer con gusto te asesoro.

Gracias
JJ
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-21 10:34:48+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12654154087/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-21 16:44:26+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12654220546/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-21 10:34:46+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12654174166/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-21 10:34:42+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12654237711/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-21 10:34:39+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12654220926/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
b-jazz (2025-03-13 15:50:06+00:00): Hello fellow golf course mapper. The lines that define Fairways and Greens should never intersect or partially overlap each other and we noticed that they are overlapping in one or more of the fairway/green pairs in this changeset. If there is no obvious fringe around the green, the fairway should butt up against the green and every node between them should be *shared*. If there is a fringe around the green that is similar to the fairway, the fairway should extend around the green and the two objects should be merged together into a multipolygon (See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon for how to create them with your map editor).  Please read the wiki for visual examples an instructions on how to better map golf courses: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls. If you have any questions, please reply here and I'll gladly help clarify things. Thanks!
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-21 10:34:44+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12654250617/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-31 16:11:38+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12654226600/history has fixme:type = office that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What kind of office is here?

If unclear, maybe office=yes would fit? Already more clear than hopeless amenity=fixme

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:office
Metzor (2025-03-12 21:36:31+00:00): Hi tguen,

Having randomly picked some ways, this looks like some nice corrections you made with this chageset. Thanks!
Did you discuss or document this automatized (?) edit somewhere so I could learn from it or reapply it?

There is some nodes for which you fixed the house=xyz value but the node is part of a way which is already tagged as house. So rather than correcting the spelling, you might consider to delete the tag. Example:
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/node/11116641580

Best regards and happy mapping
Metzor
tguen (2025-03-15 05:35:18+00:00): Hello. There is no discussion or documentation for this edit as I don't think it's necessary. I just found some values for house=* on taginfo that had an obviously equivalent and documented value. I downloaded them with an overpass query in JOSM, reviewed several chosen at random, and mass-retagged them.

Thank you for pointing out the mistagged nodes. I should have checked the nodes more carefully but didn't think about it. Someone has already fixed them but I'm planning on searching for and fixing similar errors.
Metzor (2025-03-15 07:31:00+00:00): Thanks for your explanation!
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-17 00:29:02+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165049947
JJIglesias (2025-03-12 18:52:01+00:00): Saludos. La linea NO era innecesaria. Tu cambio ha sido revertido (Borrado).

Por favor NO borrar nada en el mapa sin primero consultarlo con mapeadores mas experimentados.

Gracias
aharvey (2025-03-12 23:15:14+00:00): hi could you explain how you've determined these tag values?
5m4u9 (2025-03-13 06:08:57+00:00): Hola, gracias por añadir esta ciclovía, ya estaba registrada como parte de la avenida, pero siempre es mejor separarla. Estuve mejorando y poniendo el nombre.

Sabes que tipo de separación tiene? bolardos flexibles? cordón de cemento? solo pintado? 🤔
jjyach (2025-03-12 14:18:16+00:00): Do you have a source for this park?  It looks like just a drainage pond.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-04-06 08:51:22+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1366413873/history has dock = wet_dock that was added in this edit
what was meant by dock=wet_dock ? It is not documented at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Ddock - maybe it should be documented there, if this tagging is valid.

Is it about docks pernamently filled with water?
FajrAl (2026-04-07 01:09:23+00:00): I've fixed it. It's a pier with a cover on it.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-04-07 12:32:03+00:00): Thanks for a fix!
NeisReview (2025-03-12 06:54:59+00:00): #DeletionsCheck

Hi, welcome to OSM.

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that many changes in this set involve deletions.

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.
Sammyhawkrad (2025-03-13 07:46:03+00:00): Hello Joseph, you deleted existing hostels for no legitimate reason. Your changes have been reverted via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163558200
GOwin (2025-03-13 01:34:32+00:00): Thank you for your edits, @TDH. They're definitely helping make the map better for everyone.

If you happen to speak or understand Cebuano/Binisaya, there's a hyperlocal group of contributors in Signal: https://bit.ly/osmKombati , OSM Kombati.
s777n (2025-03-12 20:24:28+00:00): Удалил вашу правку. Переместил точку озона и добавил wildberries заново. У озона помимо  имени есть куча других тегов. Послей вашей правки получилась точка с именем WildBerries но всеми остальными тегами Озона. В таких случаях лучше  добавить только wildberries и поставить заметку что озон находится в другом месте.
NeisBot (2025-03-12 05:03:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was flagged because your added description contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment
NeisReview (2025-03-21 19:29:34+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/163512091
rskedgell (2025-03-12 11:27:45+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Unfortunately, your edit dragged a fence and a tree row across other map features. Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163523175
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-17 00:01:19+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165049590
ralley (2025-03-13 00:14:34+00:00): Please use descriptive changeset comments as per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Also the name field should be for proper names only: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163511908
ma-rt-in (2025-03-16 16:07:10+00:00): Moin,
bei aller Liebe, aber mit den Tags für Zugangsbeschränkung hast du es etwas übertrieben.
Was genau ist da vor Ort eigentlich beschildert?

Grüße
aharvey (2025-03-12 23:52:23+00:00): ps. you can enable the "DCS NSW Land Parcel Lot" from JOSM Imagery to show lot boundaries.
Grass-snake (2025-03-12 19:34:27+00:00): Здравствуйте, прошу перепроверить название улицы, по данным ПКК ближайшие участки отмечены под другим названием.
Grass-snake (2025-03-16 05:52:41+00:00): Не дождался ответа, исправил как посчитал нужным.
literan (2025-03-12 20:31:52+00:00): название улицы нужно писать целиком, со словом "улица".

исправлю
NeisBot (2025-03-12 06:36:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was flagged because your added description contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2025-03-21 19:28:32+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/163921711
NeisReview (2025-03-12 17:56:03+00:00): #UnexplainedChanges

Hello, welcome to OSM.

Could you please clarify the purpose behind your map changes? It's not entirely clear from the edited data and your added description. Also, what was used as a source of your activity?

Looking forward to your response. 
Thank you.
pitscheplatsch (2025-03-14 06:58:55+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163555257
eggie (2025-03-12 07:42:16+00:00): Dag Ro   Ik heb emergency=yes bijgetagd op de toegangsstukjes vanaf de L der VN. Het zou anders nog niet werken.
MVG
eggie
joost schouppe (2025-03-18 13:03:05+00:00): Ik voeg wayside shrine hier nog toe
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-17 00:01:20+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165049590
NeisReview (2025-03-12 07:07:39+00:00): Could you please answer my question in your commented changests? Thank you.
yelisey90 (2025-05-12 09:58:39+00:00): reverted - the shop is still signed as Mplus, and the website also has that name

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166143330
NeisReview (2025-03-12 07:11:55+00:00): Could you please answer my question in your commented changests? Thank you.
Awazed26 (2025-03-30 19:36:10+00:00): The comment seems a bit off. 
Just to clarify, there are two administrative centers in Ladakh: Kargil and Leh. The previous changeset reflected this, but the Kargil (245775021) node was removed from the relation as an 'admin centre.' I’d suggest reverting the change to accurately reflect both centers. To reflect the correct information.

^https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Administration_of_Ladakh

^https://www.dailyexcelsior.com/lg-ut-hqrs-head-of-police-to-have-sectts-at-both-leh-kargil-mathur
Flynn Marquardt (2025-03-31 06:47:50+00:00): Openstreetmap only allows no or one `admin_centre` as role in a relation: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:boundary#Relation_members.
Awazed26 (2025-04-10 11:37:44+00:00): ^https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14101768
Awazed26 (2025-04-10 11:38:52+00:00): ^https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1943188
Jan Olieslagers (2025-03-12 10:16:20+00:00): Thanks for efforts. Templeton is however not an active aerodrome.  I suggest either removing the "aerodrome" tag, or marking it as "disused" or even "historic". Rgds,
Jan Olieslagers (2025-03-12 10:23:31+00:00): Then again, there is already way 89819874 which looks like describing the field more accurately.
lostmike (2025-03-12 14:21:18+00:00): Definately not an aerodrome anymore.
Your mapping does not show the current state of the area.
Max-Kritic (2025-03-15 10:20:28+00:00): Encore des erreurs de multi-polygones. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Relation:multipolygon
NeisReview (2025-03-12 17:45:22+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

I think something went wrong here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1366482845
pitscheplatsch (2025-03-14 07:00:47+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163543014
NeisReview (2025-03-12 17:46:38+00:00): Should be reverted ...
pitscheplatsch (2025-03-14 07:00:17+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163543014
literan (2025-05-04 16:51:09+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/316157520 это не линк между автомагистралями, а разворот непонятно для кого. Значимость его в дорожной сети минимальна

Согласно Соглашению о статусах дорог https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Highway_classification "в основе классификации дорог, используемой в теге highway, должны лежать не физические характеристики, а относительная важность ("значимость") дороги в дорожной сети"

Также, согласно этому принятому сообществом документу, highway=motorway_link это "съезды на развязках дорог, на которых действуют те же правила движения, что и на highway=motorway". Здесь https://yandex.ru/maps/-/CHr5AX-r правила автомагистрали не действуют.

Я верну статус unclassified, как дороги самого низшего класса
literan (2025-05-04 16:51:51+00:00): если ты хочешь поменять правила (как ты писал недавно в переписке со мной), то меняй их, а потом будем перемапливать. Пока действует именно это Соглашение.
NeisReview (2025-03-12 17:44:18+00:00): #NoTags

Hi, welcome to OSM.

I've reviewed your latest map edits and it seems that this changeset you created includes nodes and ways without any tags. Could there have been an issue during the mapping process?

Looking forward to your response.

Thank you!
NeisRevert (2025-03-21 20:33:55+00:00): #hotosm
Strubbl (2025-04-12 14:30:44+00:00): Wenn der Weg abgesperrt wurde, ist er noch da. Dann ist Löschen falsch. Der Weg war bereits korrekt kartiert mit access=no.

Bitte nicht so schnell Dinge in OSM löschen! Vor allem dann, wenn sie noch vorhanden sind. Dann gehören sie gescheit getaggt.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-07 06:38:47+00:00): DWG revert - poor quality mapping

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164618287
Andrea Musuruane (2025-03-17 09:43:05+00:00): Ciao. Per favore, come da convenzione, la parte letterale dei numeri civici, si scrive con lettere minuscole e senza separatori. Grazie, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163516432
NeisBot (2025-03-12 09:03:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was flagged because your added description contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2025-03-21 19:28:04+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/163518152
dpolovinkin (2025-04-01 04:20:58+00:00): добрый день, можете пожалуйста в будущем писать в комментарии что именно изменяете, у вас кажется что все комменты на ченджсетах сделанных не с телефона это "исследование на местности", по факту ничего не говорит что именно было изменено).. так по идее нельзя

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Good_changeset_comments

спс!
dpolovinkin (2025-05-28 21:44:21+00:00): я вижу вы продолжаете спустя 2 месяца делать ровно тоже самое, вы читали мой комментарий? можете пожалуйста писать осмысленные комментарии, иначе придется подавать репорт админам OSM. спасибо!
Nikita Moiseev (2025-05-29 09:24:12+00:00): Здравствуйте Дмитрий!
Очень рад что вы столь внимательны к чужой работе, но прежде чем оценивать чужие правки, пожалуйста объясните почему вас заботят правки именно в районе посёлка Джангельды, Бухарской области? И только после этого у нас может завяжется обсуждение моих описаний к правкам.
Благодарю!
dpolovinkin (2025-05-29 11:33:03+00:00): да ладно уж, при чем тут ваш поселок, будто это только у него - вы и в Ташкенте и по всему Узбекистану тоже самое делаете, я просто случайный ченджсет открыл и в нем написал

обсуждения завязывать у меня цели нет, да и какое оно может быть, тут же все просто) хотел просто сказать что оставлять осмысленные комментарии надо - где бы они не были, будь то Нью Йорк или поселок в Бухарской области)
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-07 05:33:47+00:00): DWG revert - poor quality mapping

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164616497
NeisBot (2025-03-12 09:12:49+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was flagged because your added description contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment
NeisReview (2025-03-21 19:27:24+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/163921680
NeisBot (2025-03-12 09:24:58+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was flagged because your added description contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2025-03-21 19:27:00+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/163921666
mathiscouderc (2025-03-25 08:22:21+00:00): ?
NeisReview (2025-03-25 08:40:42+00:00): ?
Andrea Musuruane (2025-03-17 10:12:07+00:00): Ciao. Questo POI è già presente: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10563148967 Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163518652
TrickyFoxy (2025-03-12 23:35:28+00:00): В правом меню редактора есть кнопка «Настройки фонового изображения». Выберите там спутниковые снимки ESRI — они свежее

Как я понимаю вы наривовали наугад, потому что с ESRI не бьётся
StC (2025-03-14 22:51:55+00:00): Bonjour,

je doute que les données OSM constituent une matérialisation physique du caractère privé au sens de l'article 226-4-3 du code pénal créé par l'article 8 de la loi que vous mentionnez.

En revanche, le consensus au sein de la communauté OSM est que les données OSM sont une représentation fidèle des chemins physiquement existants sur le terrain. Si chemin existant, il doit être dans OSM tant qu'il existe. S'il est privé, un tag access=private peut être ajouté. Si l'accès privé est matérialisé physiquement, des objets OSM peuvent être ajoutés pour représenter cette matérialisation physique.
pyrog (2025-03-15 10:36:47+00:00): La limitation de l'accès physique à ce secteur est compréhensible.

Par contre la suppression pur et simple des données est une forme de vandalisme.

La communauté OpenStreetMap est ouverte au dialogue, à la pédagogie, mais votre intervention de manière anonyme ne plaide pas en faveur du dialogue.

OpenStreetMap est certes libre, mais n'autorise pas tout et n'importe quoi.

De plus je constate aussi que les sentiers que vous avez supprimés d'OSM sont toujours présents dans les données ouverte de l'IGN.

Je vois aussi que le sentier partant de la D991 et menant à l'Aven du Valat Nègre est passé en access=no

Dans OSM, les règles d'accès sont claires : elles correspondent à la réalité du terrain.
Je ne vois ni panneaux, ni barrières ajoutés.
La source "local knowledge" me parait très légère dans ce contexte.

Vous pourriez mettre en référence des comptes-rendus de délibérés du conseil municipal, ou d'échanges avec les associations locales (clubs de spéléologies, de randonnées…) ?

Cordialement,
Yves Pratter — Groupe OSM Plein Air
gunwin (2025-03-18 07:59:25+00:00): Bonjour, 
Les panneaux et les barrières ont toujours été présents, mais non respectés, les sentiers représentés sur l'IGN n'ont aucune existence légale. Dans le cas présent il s'agit de cheminements d'animaux et aucunement de sentiers de randonnées.
Je suis novice dans l'utilisation de openstreetmap, navré si j'ai mal fait les choses. Mais je ne peux plus tolérer les dégradations qui mettent mes animaux en dangers et les utilisateurs de la route également.

Cdt 
Fabien Robert
StC (2025-03-18 12:21:11+00:00): OSM n'est pas une organisation pyramidale, mais une communauté d'individus qui chacun apporte sa petite pierre. Du coup, la seule manière de coordonner les gens est de proposer une règle qui leur paraisse juste. Sinon, ce que l'un a défait l'autre le refera.

La "règle juste" qu'on essaye de proposer en ce moment est à deux niveaux :
- tout chemin sur terrain privé et interdit d'accès doit être marqué comme tel et les producteurs de cartes doivent en tenir compte (ne pas les afficher, sauf sur des cartes réservées aux secours, ou les afficher clairement comme interdits)
- utiliser les sources les plus objectives possibles pour décider ce qui est (encore) un chemin et ce qui ne l'est pas (ou plus).

On travaille sur le premier point, en essayant de convaincre les cartes les plus populaires d'avoir le bon comportement. Sur le second, ce qui marche le mieux est de faire des photos et de les partager (directement dans Panoramax, par exemple avec l'application Baba, ou bien sur le forum).
aharvey (2025-03-12 11:42:42+00:00): hi I've re-instated this but used the abandoned lifecycle prefix, since there is still a faint painted outline of the netball court, but given the faded paint and the parking lines seems unlikely still in used.
Andrea Musuruane (2025-03-17 10:13:18+00:00): Per favore, non eliminare i POI che erano già presenti, perché non preservi la history. Grazie, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163519000
aceman444 (2025-03-17 00:35:43+00:00): Zdroj nazvu? Ortofoto asi nie.