piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NorthCrab_upload (2023-12-17 12:20:21+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184994812
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184990075
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184993275
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184996213
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184995556
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184994530
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184995937
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184991070
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184990556
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184990293
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184995412
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184997459
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184993477
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184990907
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184989608
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184992036
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184991523
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184996640
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184996896
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184996510
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184989845
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184991379
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184990736
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184993037
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184989450
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184991237
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184991873
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100351233
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/293205890
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100351367
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/293205639
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/293205641
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/293205894
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100351246
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/293205651
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/293205779
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100351387
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100351261
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/293205916
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/293205917
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/293205918
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/293205669
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100351400
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100351402
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/293205679
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100351548
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/293205707
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/293205717
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100351320
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/293205735
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/293205737
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100351213
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100351215
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100351221

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Jordi MF (2023-12-17 12:59:46+00:00): Hola kinyones,
el usuario paunofu modificó el nombre de la partida "la Troia" porque se basó en la toponimia oficial de la Acadèmia Valenciana de la Llengua. Te enlazo la toponimia oficial publicada por el Institut Cartogràfic Valencià (https://visor.gva.es/visor/?extension=770876,4302112,771579,4302443&nivelZoom=18&capasids=Imagen;,Toponimia;&tcapas=1.0,1.0). En la etiqueta "name" debe de ir la toponimia oficial, a no ser que facilites algún documento oficial del Ayuntamiento de Dénia donde entre en contradicción con la toponimia oficial. Mientrastanto, creo que lo mejor sería mantener en "name" el topónimo la Troia. En castellano, no he encontrado ningún documento que aluda a "Las Troyas". En principio, los topónimos no se traducen si no se tiene constancia de un uso histórico en castellano. Por ahora, lo podemos dejar. Por último, si el topónimos "les Troies" es usado (tal y como parece ser según el nombre del Camí de les Troies), puede mantenerse dentro de la etiqueta "alt_name".
Saludos,
Jordi
Jordi MF (2023-12-17 12:49:54+00:00): Hola kinyones,
Recuerda que la etiqueta "name" no debe usarse para añadir nombres descriptivos. Traslado el nombre "Piscina abandonada" a la etiqueta "description" y añadiré el prefijo de ciclo de vida para indicar que está abandonada.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-12-17 18:00:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145224317 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some pro-Russian vandalism in Ukraine
Jordi MF (2023-12-17 12:48:16+00:00): Hola kinyones,
Diría que hay una falta ortográfico en el nombre de la urbanización en construcción. No me he atreviso a cambiarla porque leyendo la siguiente noticia, parece que la urbanización se llamará "Residencial Nautilius". ¿Es así?
https://valenciaplaza.com/cecotec-se-estrena-promotor-inmobiliario-155-viviendas-denia-torrent
kinyones (2023-12-17 12:54:23+00:00): Correcto, se llamara así, la verdad es que he puesto el nombre de la promotora porque era de lo que me acordaba jeje
InsertUser (2023-12-18 17:41:44+00:00): What software is asking you to add layer tags to objects that don't overlap with other objects?

I need to file a bug report with them as there is no risk of confusion with these features.
user_20033850 (2023-12-19 13:49:07+00:00): It's the iD editor.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-12-17 19:54:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145227499 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some pro-Russian vandalism in Ukraine
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-12-17 19:54:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145227499 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some pro-Russian vandalism in Ukraine
danieldegroot2 (2023-12-17 13:01:18+00:00): Hey Victor,

I would like to suggest changing to description and adding informal=yes to both steps and path.

Regards,

Daniel
VictorIE (2023-12-17 16:39:30+00:00): Hi,

I have no skin in the game. I was only dealing with name="Steps (Added by residents)"

If the steps are concrete or other robust material, I think adding informal=yes would be unkind.
danieldegroot2 (2023-12-17 17:06:41+00:00): It looks like the surface is tagged paving_stones, so a few loosely stacked pavers. Anyhow, I'm fine with leaving it as-is.
Langlaeufer (2023-12-17 20:02:41+00:00): Wenn es sinnlos ist, dann schadet kein Eintrag auch nicht. Bitte keine Verbote eintragen die nicht formal existieren.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145213688
KlausG (2023-12-17 20:16:49+00:00): Formell hast du Recht, aber was soll ein Radfahrer machen, der in die Straße "Oberricklinger Tor" (toll, das jemand den Namen eingetragen hat, denn ich habe kein Straßenschild gesehen) versehentlich gelockt wird: 50m weiter endet die Straße, links ist Kfz-Straße, rechts auch, auf der Straße durchgezogene Linie: es bleibt ein U-Turn an der Ampel, oder absteigen und zu Fuß über die durchgezogene Linie... Beides vermutlich mit höchster Unfallgefahr.

Vielleicht melde ich das bei Gelegenheit einmal der Stadt, mit dem Hinweis, dass so eine schlampige Beschilderung eigentlich als Straftat angezeigt werden sollte.

Da fällt mir ein, wenn man das nicht gleich so einträgt, dass man da als Radfahrer nicht hinsoll, könnte man das als Gefahrenstelle kennzeichnen.
Langlaeufer (2023-12-17 22:49:00+00:00): Der Radfahrer wird dort doch gar nicht hingeroudtet weil es dort nicht weitergeht.

Ist übrigens noch schlimmer als man erst denkt: man kann dort reinfahren darf dann aber eigentlich nicht mehr rausfahren weil die Kraftfahrstraße erst kurz vor der Ampel endet
gscholz (2023-12-18 08:00:46+00:00): Hi glemco,
your recent edits have left behind several duplicate nodes:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=8.09257&lat=45.20374&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=145213947

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Senihtu (2025-08-02 15:37:21+00:00): Hi!
Mit dem changeset hast Du Way 224962828 als access=customers getaggt.
Gleichzeitig ist den OSM-Daten zu entnehmen, das Bus 314 Stadtverkehr Bebra: Bahnhof => Bahnhof	(Relation 2990614) diesen Weg als Wendeschleife benutzt.
Ist der Weg der Buslinie falsch eingetragen? oder ist der Accesswert falsch?
Hoffentlich kennst Du Dich dort besser aus als ich und kannst zur Klärung beitragen..
schönes Wochenende!
Map_HeRo (2025-08-03 15:32:22+00:00): Hallo, der Weg liegt auf dem Firmengelände und ist (wenn ich mich richtig erinnere) keine öffentliche Straße. Kann aber durchaus sein, dass der Bus dort wenden darf. Ich schau mir das bei nächster Gelegenheit noch mal an. Auf jeden Fall schon mal danke für den Hinweis. Gruß Mikke
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-12-17 19:52:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145227422 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some pro-Russian vandalism in Ukraine
Frans S (2023-12-22 11:13:06+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please check the wiki highways how to tag highways in rural areas.


the tag residential is used in urban areas.
Best regards
J-MUC (2023-12-17 14:07:58+00:00): ... Shop.
Olga | Yanosik (2023-12-20 08:35:39+00:00): Jeżeli Kolejowa została otwarta dla normalnego ruchu to trzeba usunąć również tagi remontowe (opening_date, note) oraz usunąć restrykcje remontowe. Jeżeli Kartuska jest już dwukierunkowa to też trzeba usunąć notatkę.
ayxis (2024-08-05 07:19:21+00:00): Hi hmkaiser!
Du hast diesen Rastplatz wirklich schön ausgearbeitet. Allerdings kann ich deine Intention hinter dem site-Tagging nicht ganz nachvollziehen (Bsp. für Lorsch Ost: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2825592) 

In meinen Augen wäre dieser Schritt für einen Rastplatz doch gar nicht notwendig gewesen.

Viele Grüße
ayxis
hmkaiser (2024-08-05 11:07:22+00:00): Hallo ayxis,

oh wei, das ist jetzt über 8 Monate her. Ich bilde mir ein, dass ich da über etwas auf der östlichen Seite gestolpert war und daraufhin diese "schöne" Ausarbeitung gemacht habe. Kann es aber selbst nicht mehr nachvollziehen.
Jedenfalls hast du Recht: Wäre so nicht nötig gewesen.
ayxis (2024-08-05 12:47:53+00:00): Achso, okay. Ich habe mich nur gewundert, da ich so das in Verbindung einer Raststätte zum ersten Mal gesehen habe. Danke für deine Rückmeldung :)
canfe (2023-12-17 16:15:14+00:00): Non penso sia un abandoned:buildind=yes
(si mappa così e non separato)
Ma un brown filed
Ti prego di correggere.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145218429
canfe (2023-12-17 16:32:10+00:00): La Farmacia centrale e la parafarmacia sono la stessa cosa?
Altrimenti vanno solo "spostate".
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145218429
lorenzo7797 (2023-12-17 17:04:01+00:00): No, sono due cose separate. E la parafarmacia ha chiuso da poco.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145218429
basilisk (2023-12-17 16:06:26+00:00): Блин, это однако шакарная накладочка. Только вот сел отрисовывать свой трек (https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/basilisk/traces/11234551), а оно уже полчаса как нарисовано :)
canfe (2023-12-17 16:09:43+00:00): No, non bisogna dare un civico ad un edificio.
Il civico va messo come NODO sull'ingresso, dove c'è la targhetta del numero.
Ti prego correggi, da satellite non si può...
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145219188
Grass-snake (2024-07-12 17:09:58+00:00): Reverted:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153864840
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-21 06:12:33+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11425819549/history has shop = cbd that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
shop=cbd ? What kind of shop, if any is here? See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=cannabis - is shop=cannabis intentionally not used here?
Davidos64 (2025-03-21 06:45:35+00:00): Hi Mateusz Korieczny,

At the time I added this store, I didn't yet know about the Tag:shop=cannabis that I learned about about 2 months ago, I have to think about modifying the few stores that I put with the cbd tag. Thank you for reminding me and I wish you a good day.

Davidos64
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-21 08:10:30+00:00): I will change this specific one then
Davidos64 (2025-03-21 12:42:47+00:00): I also added these two if you want
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12074988055#map=19/42.786295/0.593769&layers=D
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6637453985#map=19/43.386334/-1.659829&layers=D
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-03 03:26:18+00:00): retagged also these two then
evinouze (2025-01-23 10:28:20+00:00): Bonjour,

J'ai un doute sur l'objet https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1231923031/history/1
Je ne vois pas d'escalier à cet endroit.
C'est un accès privé et sécurisé par un portail. Est-ce que cet objet a lieu d'exister sous cette forme ?
chimel38 (2025-01-23 15:26:33+00:00): Effectivement c'est un accès étroit et privé, avec des marches . 
Pour corriger j'ai affecté le tag private à ce way et ajouté le portail. qui devrait répondre à vos remarques.
CurlingMan13 (2023-12-18 03:29:59+00:00): Why did you add duplicate water areas?  Why are you continuing to map overlapping landcovers?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145219869
MxxCon (2023-12-17 19:58:41+00:00): Hello.
As documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description this tag MUST NOT be used for advertising or promotional purposes.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145219892
Rockedf (2023-12-17 20:04:20+00:00): Thanks for the clarification my friend. Regards.
dankarran (2023-12-17 16:00:15+00:00): Addressing added per local signage. 

Numbering on the Rathbone Street edge of the development seems to go in the opposite direction to existing properties on the eastern side.

Numbering at the eastern end of Norah Smyth Road suggests Fortunes Dock should perhaps be 2 rather than 22 as used in their marketing.

🤷‍♂️
dankarran (2023-12-20 11:45:17+00:00): It looks like historically 95 Rathbone Street was opposite the end of Tant Avenue, roughly where it has been reinstated, but the numbering direction has been changed for some reason

https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=18.4&lat=51.51439&lon=0.01147&layers=170&b=1
MxxCon (2023-12-17 20:05:27+00:00): Hello.
There's a confusion in names.
name=Ride Aid
name:en=Walgreens
Which one is it?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145220165
compilation-error (2023-12-17 20:20:07+00:00): It is Walgreens now.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145220165
CurlingMan13 (2023-12-18 03:29:12+00:00): Why did you delete the water features here?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145220289
brocos (2023-12-17 15:59:07+00:00): First usage of multi polygon, want to be sure the changes are implemented in a correct manner
eggie (2023-12-17 16:45:32+00:00): Hoi.. MP's lijken me helemaal correct.
Pietluttigheidje. We zetten in het relatievenster de outer altijd helemaal boven. Dat is handig voor het geval er nog veel meer inners zijn.

Mapse,
eggie
Grass-snake (2024-07-12 17:12:00+00:00): Reverted:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153864928
CurlingMan13 (2023-12-18 03:22:12+00:00): Why are you continuing to map things with overlapping landcovers.  I have mentioned this as a changeset comment previously, on multiple occasions, but yet, you are continuing to purposely overlap areas.  It seems you know better since after deliberating changing it to overlap, you are changing it back.

As a reminder, do not edit for the renderer.  Just map it correctly the first time, rather than changing it back and forth.
CurlingMan13 (2023-12-18 03:23:03+00:00): User is continuing to overlap landcovers.  They "fixed" the issue they caused in this case in changeset:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145221413
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145220897
Arch (2023-12-17 18:08:58+00:00): http://revert.osmz.ru/
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-07-08 17:19:54+00:00): hello!


can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4845115 ?
mcliquid (2023-12-17 18:20:59+00:00): Hi,

just a general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
CurlingMan13 (2023-12-18 03:28:42+00:00): Why did you delete the water features?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145221413
O Bicho Geográfico (2023-12-19 12:44:47+00:00): Você registrou rodovias e ruas inteiras como túneis. Por favor, rever.
Patchanka (2023-12-18 19:00:38+00:00): bonjour 
attention à ne pas mettre de nom pour des chemins qui n'ont pas de nom.
"chemin" n'est pas un nom !
Je vais supprimer ces noms en trop.
Je vous ai envoyé un message avec quelques bonnes pratiques à connaitre !
bonne soirée
Grass-snake (2024-07-13 06:26:18+00:00): Reverted:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153879909
Grass-snake (2024-07-12 16:48:54+00:00): Reverted
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153864027
GerdP (2024-01-24 09:57:00+00:00): Moin aus Wildeshausen!
Du hast hier diesen Wald https://www.osm.org/way/130763132
wieder über den Gieskenmoorweg erweitert. Nach meinem Verständnis wächst auf einer gepflasterten Straße kein Wald, daher hatte ich das vorher so erfasst, dass der Wald an der Straße endet. 
Warum siehst Du das anders?
_zalle_ (2024-01-24 12:45:14+00:00): Der Gieskenmoorweg führt an dieser Stelle von Süden kommend durch ein geschlossenes Waldgebiet mit mindestens bis zur Einmündung des Lethemoorwegs geschlossener Blätterkrone. Der Teil des Waldes westlich des Gieskenmoorwegs war zuvor schlichtweg überhaupt nicht erfasst, vgl. https://osmcha.org/changesets/124876677/
GerdP (2024-01-24 13:41:07+00:00): Ich fände es besser, das kleine Stück westlich als eigene Fläche zu erfassen, aber es ist wohl ein Grenzfall.
_zalle_ (2024-01-24 16:15:13+00:00): Moin Gerd,
ich hab die Fläche entsprechend umgebaut. Wenn du künftig derartige Probleme in meinen Änderungssätzen findest, kannst du das gerne selbst korrigieren, ich bin da völlig unemfindlich.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-31 17:48:23+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11425928148/history has fixme:type = parking that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
Is it a parking for cars? (amenity=parking)
for bicycles? (amenity=bicycle_parking)
Something else?
Arch (2023-12-17 16:54:35+00:00): Work in progress.
sjwhitak (2023-12-17 16:57:27+00:00): For example, the RIPTA GTFS contains route_ref, but I see on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Buses that it prefers the tag "ref", but https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ref shows ref has multiple options. I've tried asking for help on #osm but I guess this works too. I just don't want to post a lot of bus stops and get rejected. Thanks!
dónal (2023-12-17 17:29:52+00:00): Also see the following pages: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dbus_stop

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aroute%3Dbus
dónal (2023-12-17 17:49:31+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import is also relevant to this.
Grass-snake (2024-07-13 19:24:35+00:00): Reverted:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153906974
simo_explorer (2024-01-26 14:29:06+00:00): why not a simple "wikidata" instead of "label:wikidata" ?
thank you for your contribution
gscholz (2023-12-21 09:04:53+00:00): Hi miluethi,
your recent changesets have created a lot of errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-86.47705&lat=13.82754&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=145222400

Most probably you selected a bunch of buildings and just pressed "q" without checking the results.

May be you like to use the internal validator of JOSM before you upload to avoid such errors:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Validator

An other side effect of your edit is that the shape of the affected buildings no longer matches the reality. This is not only valid for buildings that originally had a circular shape.

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2023-12-25 10:17:22+00:00): Hi miluethi, 
these errors still exist, can I get your feedback here?
Guido
gscholz (2023-12-28 08:25:03+00:00): Hi miluethi,
these errors still exist, can I get your feedback here?
Guido
gscholz (2023-12-30 08:58:58+00:00): Hi miluethi, 
due to your missing response I have reverted this changeset to fix those issues.
Guido
Grass-snake (2024-07-12 18:09:22+00:00): Reverted:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153866918
gscholz (2023-12-21 09:04:39+00:00): Hi miluethi,
your recent changesets have created a lot of errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-86.47705&lat=13.82754&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=145222632

Most probably you selected a bunch of buildings and just pressed "q" without checking the results.

May be you like to use the internal validator of JOSM before you upload to avoid such errors:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Validator

An other side effect of your edit is that the shape of the affected buildings no longer matches the reality. This is not only valid for buildings that originally had a circular shape.

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2023-12-18 08:01:11+00:00): 

Hi glemco,
your recent edits have left behind several duplicate nodes:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=8.09257&lat=45.20374&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=145222660

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
canfe (2023-12-17 17:54:34+00:00): ottimo bisognerebbe anche specificare cosa stanno cotruendo.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:construction#Buildings
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145222933
Grass-snake (2024-07-12 17:28:42+00:00): Reverted:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153865573
bwbuz (2023-12-18 07:56:41+00:00): Wieso änderst du hier und bei anderen Linien im Gebiet die korrekte Bezeichnun g "Verkehrs- und Tarifgemeinschaft Ostharz" auf die Abkürzung "VTO" obwohl diese korrekter Weise bereits als "network:short" erfasst ist? Du schaffst damit Probleme in der Auswertung und Zuordnung der PTNA - Public Transport Network Analysis - Statische Auswertungen für OpenStreetMap!