piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
woodpeck (2023-07-16 21:03:11+00:00): I have blocked user2137papież in https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7319 and requested they refrain from any large-scale road reclassifications.
balint36 (2023-06-25 12:47:33+00:00): Itt is az "operator=MÁV Ferencvárosi rendező pályaudvar" rendellenes.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-07-27 20:02:19+00:00): What you meant by surface=20 on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1183749675/history ?
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-07-27 20:37:53+00:00): What you think about such tagging: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1183749675/history ?

surface= tag is usually used for something else, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:surface
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-07-27 20:38:12+00:00): (I got PM with response)
fmoine (2023-07-27 21:07:23+00:00): I haven't found an appropriate tag to describe the value in square metres. Area_Covered I note sure about it
fmoine (2023-07-27 21:11:27+00:00): As it's a municipality's data, I have a value taken from the ground, which I have to go and check for an environmental health project. Normally you know the surface area by drawing the object correctly, so in this case you don't need a tag. And nothing in taginfo, I ask the community. Thanks for the correction
fmoine (2023-07-27 21:30:40+00:00): In the end, this tag is hard to find. I'll do an attribute join with the database and OSM
Frans S (2023-06-21 10:35:27+00:00): Please read and follow the tagging rules on this linked document.
Decision tree, which tag to be used for roads
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1S48CEVi3yiAYWhIJu57jtLyv0ZVUbGwJ/view?usp=share_link
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/East_Africa_Tagging_Guidelines
or
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa


highway=path 			Paths are usually impassable for motorized vehicles. (However, African motorcyclists can sometimes do the most improbable stunts.) In order to mark a path as appropriate for cycling, add bicycle=yes. Never use path to mark an unpaved or unsealed road in built-up residential areas: Such roads should be tagged according to the local conventions (usually highway=residential if passable by vehicles and pedestrians, or highway=footway for pedestrian only where they can sometimes be separated from another parallel highway for vehicles).
Best regards
eggie (2023-07-04 20:24:30+00:00): Bese M Roemer

Ook hier zijn alle OV routes stuk.
Ziets kun je alleen aanpakken met voldoende eevaring en dan ook nog eens met editor JOSM. Je kunt geen routes bewerken met editor iD.
Wanneer je aan routebewerking begint vraag dan even hulp aan een ervaren routemapper of aan het forum. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-07-04 21:01:09+00:00): busroute 301 hersteld
Het ziet er verder netjes uit., maar houd svp rekening met routerelaties.
Kijk eens naar editor JOSM.
Wanneer je door hebt hoe relaties werken kun je ze met die editor ook bewerken en/of verleggen.
MVG
eggie
SomeoneElse (2023-11-30 12:08:24+00:00): This edit resulted in data consumers being unable to usefully use this data.  See https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2023-November/030928.html .
confusedbuffalo (2023-11-30 17:59:27+00:00): You may have opposed the change, but there was an approved proposal for the change to emergency=water_rescue
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Emergency=water_rescue
SomeoneElse (2023-11-30 21:39:01+00:00): To be clear, 20 people thought that that proposal was a good idea.  Compared to the number that edited OSM in the last 24 hours, that's 0.37% - it's an insignificant proportion.
To add to that, _none_ of the proponents of the tag were able to address the issues raised during the voting - their replies simply showed that the did not understand how these objects have historically been tagged in OSM.
SomeoneElse (2023-11-30 21:47:03+00:00): In addition, this changeset is merely "Upgraded old tags" and is clearly just a mechanical edit to the unclear tags chosen by this "vote".
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct was not followed.  If it had been then the users of the data changed here (including the iD editor!) would have been aware.  Because it was done "in secret", they were not.
Hungerburg (2023-08-23 08:32:21+00:00): Hello Yngva, how did you determine leaf types of https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1492200 ?
Robert46798 (2023-06-27 19:43:06+00:00): Hallo Uncle Pain,

ich denke landuse=industrial ist hier das passende (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:landuse).

Sind die eingezeichneten Grenzen geschätzt, oder gibt es da eine konkrete Datenquelle? (Ich habe den Artikel nur überflogen, da aber nichts gesehen.)

Viele Grüße,
Robert
Robert46798 (2023-06-27 19:49:04+00:00): Achso, ne. Ich habe die zwei Einträge im Kopf zusammengefasst. Dann passt das natürlich grundsätzlich.
Wobei ich hier mit den lifecycle-präfixen arbeiten würde.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix

Also
proposed:landuse=industrial
proposed:industrial=factory
proposed:name=*
OSM_RogerWilco (2023-06-21 12:56:35+00:00): Moin BL4CK_H4WK.

die Meldung, dass es keine Verbindung zur L180 gibt, stimmt also nicht?

Siehe: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3293452

Viele Grüße
Roger Wilco
mueschel (2023-06-25 09:07:52+00:00): Hi,
please check this node, it got a strange 'letra' tag:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7600686392
garaolaza (2023-06-21 13:13:41+00:00): Hola Santi,

Estoy importando manualmente y uno a uno todos los datos de OpenData Euskadi en cuanto a hospitales y centros de salud de Euskadi, ya los irás viendo.

He visto que has renombrado algunos nombres para que sean bilingües. Me voy a abstener de comentar el tema pero que conste que no estoy de acuerdo con estos cambios.

Pero lo que habría que corregir es escribir "ospitalea" en euskera. En euskera esa palabra no tiene H, por lo que sería "ospitalea".

Dejo a tu criterio la pertinencia o no de esta correción.

Gracias y un saludo!
marc__marc (2024-08-30 21:34:30+00:00): Hello,
mapwithai isn't a source, the source is : aerial imagery
mapwithai is a tools :)
Regards,
Marc
kmpoppe (2025-02-08 06:16:33+00:00): All previous version of the node have been redacted.

DWG 
Ticket#2023062010000256

K
HikeAndMap (2023-07-05 21:47:11+00:00): Hi VMPanes - according to the wiki the level starts at the lowest point above earth, which means the parking entrance at the west of SM - first come 5 levels of parking area.. 

So how can shops have lvl 1 or 2, according to the wiki consensus they should be higher.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137579801
VMPanes (2023-07-05 23:15:58+00:00): I considered SM Parking Building and SM Original Building as two separate entities/buildings. Parking at 5 floors, Original at two basements, 4 floors.

I'll adjust them to follow the consensus on level.
Stalker61 (2023-07-04 18:53:41+00:00): А что такое приоритет дорог?
Ну и как оно вообще ломать статус и далеко не в первый раз. Если вас что-то не устраивает, то это не значит, что это неправильно.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-06-20 21:40:12+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10992870717

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
dzamper (2025-12-30 13:15:57+00:00): Widzę że w tym changeset zostało dodane dla https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3272604323 "name:pl=Piotrowice koło Karwiny", "wikidata=Q1374121" i "wikipedia=pl:Piotrowice koło Karwiny"

1. czy ktoś w ogóle używa nawet w Polsce tej nazwy stacji w tłumaczeniu na Polski? podejrzewam że nawet PKP nie

2. linki do wikidata i wikipedii prowadzą do elementu/artykułu nt. miejscowości, a nie stacji

ile jeszcze jest takich „niespodzianek” w na innych przystankach/stacjach? :/
Anas masuris (2025-12-30 18:07:09+00:00): Poprawiłem link do wiki

Co do nazwy, to case jest ten sam, co dla stacji w Polsce, które mają po kilkanaście nazw, z czego tylko ta po polsku jest oficjalna. Jak chcesz, to wiesz, możesz usunąć xd

Reszta wiki jest podlinkowana poprawnie, sprawdziłem
dzamper (2025-12-30 20:45:46+00:00): Jeśli to jest jedyny źle podlinkowany do Wiki to trafiło się ślepej kurze ziarno bo to był pierwszy jaki sprawdziłem xD
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-22 11:19:42+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10992889105/history - is it really having name "Shelter" in local language and "Mosque shafiey" in English? 

What you tried to map here?
BG2ETV (2024-02-12 16:57:06+00:00): 该多边形实地存在， 这是当地林业局用人工林种植的宣传标语。
如果需要的话我可以提供照片证据。

This polygon actually exists. It is a propaganda slogan written by the local forestry department in planted forests.
I can provide photographic evidence if needed.
balchen (2023-07-01 14:30:09+00:00): Den delen av g/s-veien som har en liten grussti på siden er da ikke segregated? Det er ingen anvisning om separasjon av gående og syklende og gående f. eks. på rulleskøyter eller med barnevogn vil fritt benytte den asfalterte delen.
gormur (2023-07-04 07:44:27+00:00): Vet ikke helt hvilken du mener... Kanskje en glipp?
balchen (2023-07-04 08:03:23+00:00): Tenkte på denne: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1087780536#map=18/58.92048/5.72828
gormur (2023-07-07 14:31:07+00:00): Du har nok rett. Bedre nå :)
ovruni (2023-06-21 00:06:11+00:00): Hola, he notado que nuevamente se han modificando vías diferente a lo que se muestra desde las imágenes de Bing que usted esta indicando, ademas de ver muchas otras vías residenciales donde no se muestran huellas de vehículos, por lo que he revertido sus conjuntos de cambios.
Para cualquier consulta sobre el mapeo de OSM en Perú, puedes realizar consultas por el canal de telegram de la comunidad peruana https://t.me/osmpe
Saludos
Taya_S (2023-06-21 10:02:08+00:00): Hallo MappingNomad,

Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Groeten,
Taya
balint36 (2023-06-25 11:11:12+00:00): Ismételten kérlek, hogy csupán a renderelés miatt ne tölts fel értelmetlen/fölösleges dolgokat!
Fradi keleti és nyugati rendezője eddig is fent volt a térképen. Aztán tessék elolvasni a "place=locality" leírását! A Fradi még mindig használatban van.
balint36 (2023-06-25 11:15:52+00:00): Továbbá a "start_date" címkéket is hasraütés-szerűen töltötted ki, de szerintem nem is tudod az évszámot, oly módon töltötted ki. A Fradi rendezői nem egyszerre készültek el, hanem előbb a nyugati, utána a keleti.
balint36 (2023-06-25 11:16:23+00:00): Az "operator" címke is eléggé sajátosan lett kitöltve a "MÁV Ferencvárosi rendező pályaudvar" értékkel.
Dimitar155 (2023-06-21 18:55:19+00:00): Привет Fraxi,

За brand:wikidata и нетовите разновидности, можеш да изтеглиш Name Suggestion Index (от настройките на JOSM -> Tagging presets). Избирането на шаблона става с F3 или F4 (ако не ме лъже паметта).

Поздрави,
Митко
VictorIE (2025-12-13 17:04:53+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1015654203/history

You had a fixme on this. I think I worked it out. Possibly missing a pole in the farm yard.
PluMGMK (2025-12-14 00:37:23+00:00): Ah OK, I guess it's much less complicated than I thought!
erickdeoliveiraleal (2024-02-22 02:06:17+00:00): voltei para unclassified: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1027081757/history
mrpulley (2024-12-20 22:16:10+00:00): 170873360 - maxspeed 50 (not 60) - corrected by AntBurnett at changeset 140254103
1169303349 - maxspeed 100 correct
Jada-Baruch Innovative Limited (2023-06-20 23:20:30+00:00): Plumeria fragrance
Jada-Baruch Innovative Limited (2023-07-07 06:10:51+00:00): #plumeria #fragrance
SekeRob (2023-06-21 14:54:29+00:00): Hi, you broke the vineyard relation west of Via Casino Vezzani completely. I'll be restoring that soon.

ciao
Puttanellosgobbato06 (2023-06-21 10:12:19+00:00): Viva la figa
Note_Fixer (2023-06-20 23:58:22+00:00): demolished, rebuild.
Cortix (2023-06-28 13:51:07+00:00): Ti consiglio di non continuare a modificare senza senso la mappa. Grazie
Andrea Musuruane (2023-06-21 14:00:21+00:00): Ciao. I nomi delle strade provinciali/regionali/statali si inseriscono nel tag name delle relazioni di tipo route. Nel tag name delle way di tipo highway, ci devono essere i nomi presenti a stradario. Ciao, Andrea
Fedurli (2023-06-21 23:20:16+00:00): Laddove è presente il nome della via assegnato dal comune, ho messo quello. Sulle superstrade e sulle autostrade si usa inserire il nome della strada, vedi Autostrada dei Vini. In molti tratti, specie quando non vi sono abitazioni (vedi primo tratto SS460) non c'è alcun nome "da stradario"
Andrea Musuruane (2023-06-22 06:13:09+00:00): Se non c'e' alcun nome da stradario, non si inserisce alcun valore nel tag name delle highway.
Supaplex (2023-06-21 01:28:11+00:00): 新竹、苗栗、台中的溪流
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137582830
Supaplex (2023-06-22 02:30:34+00:00): 已經有了
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/115373530#map=14/24.3117/120.5502
如果範圍有出入可以調整大小
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137583071
okadatsuneo (2023-06-21 23:54:49+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM.
Your edit has broken the relation of the wood area.
If you don't know much about "relation", it is better not to edit the wood area.
RobertTBS (2023-06-21 03:43:42+00:00): There's no reason to remove the roads.If they are private, mark the roads with tag access=private and if there is a hazard, add hazard=(hazard). By removing the road, you make openstreetmap less accurate.
OhioPettis (2023-06-21 09:58:17+00:00): There is absolutely a reason. Are you aware how many people have died at n that area operating vehicles on unsafe roads? Maybe I should make their locations in the map also. People think they can drive their vehicle someplace they should not because you put a line on a map. Much of what looks like a road is difficult for a tractor to drive on, but from a satellite looks perfectly drivable. There is no reason to mark a "road" in this location.
allen4names (2023-06-21 02:43:02+00:00): [Facepalm]: West of 20th Avenue.
user_5359 (2023-06-23 06:33:42+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please take a look on http://www.osm.org/node/604609622. What is the mean of the tag Nomor JPL = 59? Is this a reference number (see key ref)?
user_5359 (2023-06-21 05:40:26+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I remove your SEO SPAM (mostly foreign keys).
ТатьянаC (2023-06-21 07:38:40+00:00): хватит портить карту!
ТатьянаC (2023-06-21 10:01:43+00:00): работайте честно!!!!!!!!!!!!
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-01 10:08:23+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10993711574/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
Diacritic (2023-06-21 03:38:20+00:00): Hey Tannia,

I've noticed your edits with somne interest. May I ask to what end you are making these changes? I can't work out why you are adding these splits.

Dian.
Tanz111 (2023-06-21 03:52:07+00:00): Hi, 
The split in the way is required at the intersecting node (especially at traffic signals), preventing aggregation from ending at the intersection.
jnighan (2023-09-11 20:35:31+00:00): Hi, Ruby Road/Polster Road should not be mapped as secondary north of the I-84 ramps. Mapping it this way creates a classification spur, it does not meet the criteria for highway=secondary in the Connecticut/Highway classification guidelines (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Connecticut/Highway_classification), and this short route is not part of the roads used for long-distance travel. Although it is used as a side route for travelers stopping at Love's Travel Stop, it is not itself part of any long-distance routes.
jnighan (2023-09-11 20:36:57+00:00): I'm changing it back to highway=residential -- if you disagree, please feel free to take the discussion to the OpenStreetMap slack server, #local-connecticut channel.
SzymonH (2023-06-21 08:32:31+00:00): Autobusy L27 kursują ulicami Łukasińskiego - Mickiewicza - Poniatowskiego, bo ulica Długosza nie kwalifikuje się do kursowania autobusów ;)
NorthCrab (2023-06-21 08:56:29+00:00): Poprawione~
user_5359 (2023-06-21 17:57:36+00:00): Welcome to OSM! May I ask for a little help? Please take a look on https://www.osmp.org/way/768072169. What is the mean of the tags
highway=trunk
highway_1=no
?
FajrAl (2023-08-31 05:31:15+00:00): kenapa diubah jadi jalan perumahan? apakah kamu pernah ke sini? saya tinggal di sekitar sini dan ini bukanlah jalan perumahan!
IrtyshRiver (2023-09-01 16:44:37+00:00): Hello FajarAlim, thank you for reaching out. I changed this from track to residential since it appears drivable in aerial imagery, and provides access to several buildings. I can see how track would also make sense here, and since you are local to this area I’m happy to go with your classification choice. Happy mapping!

Terjemahan Otomatis:
Halo FajarAlim, terima kasih sudah menghubungi. Saya mengubahnya dari trek menjadi jalan perumahan karena terlihat dapat dilalui dalam citra udara, dan menyediakan akses ke beberapa bangunan. Saya dapat melihat bagaimana lintasan juga masuk akal di sini, dan karena Anda adalah penduduk lokal di area ini, saya dengan senang hati memilih pilihan klasifikasi Anda. Selamat memetakan!
Dimitar155 (2026-06-09 08:42:47+00:00): Hello mvw93,

Most OMV stations in Bulgaria seem to have invalid numbers. OMV website shows that they use primarily mobile numbers, while here stationary number are tagged. Can you take a look and update them?

Happy mapping,
Dimitar
mvw93 (2026-06-09 08:56:42+00:00): Hi Dimitar, I only use (stationary and mobile) numbers provided directly vom OMV group.
Regards, mvw93
Dimitar155 (2026-06-09 09:10:14+00:00): Then their data might be incorrect. See node/441086666 which has a phone number starting with "02". 02 is code for Sofia-city and the petrol station is located in Plovdiv region, so it should be "032". Same for node/577529104, which should be "056".
bernardo60 (2025-08-25 09:31:22+00:00): Converting the tag "living street" to paths. A general feature of living streets is that the legislation grants pedestrians higher or equal right of way over other road users. This condition is not met in this case, it is too narrow to be a road.
tux67 (2023-06-21 13:27:45+00:00): Hi Alzirr,
please take a look if your change is only based on whether the street is shown as accessible in tools. 
We should not map for the renderer but document the status on the ground. Is there any evidence you can share that confirms your change or the previous status?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

btw.
By definition, a service route does not restrict any access:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dservice
What was leading you to this statement?
BR
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137588476
NorthCrab_upload (2023-06-21 06:30:14+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/671955803
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/916343495

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Frans S (2023-06-21 09:26:10+00:00): Hello. In addition to my other comments:
Please do not connect nodes of a highway to other features, like here, an electrical powerline.  (these are far above the ground)
Best regards
jandar22 (2023-06-21 15:13:23+00:00): Hi, per the OSM wiki good practices it's recommended not to map features that no longer exist, which includes a good portion of these abandoned railways (for example, the demolished railyard in South Bend that was  once bounded by Indiana, Franklin, Ewing, and Main streets). For consistency and cleanliness of the map I'd like to request removal of the railways that have been demolished and/or are no longer visible. Thank you!
gabro00 (2023-06-21 06:47:49+00:00): Szia!
Ezek a két perjellel elválasztott címek valósak? Például 8/A/1.
urbalazs (2023-06-21 07:30:08+00:00): Ez értelmezés kérdése. A helyszínen valószínűleg így van kitáblázva, mint sok más egyéb helyen is. Az oka az, hogy a vállalkozó megvett egy telket, amire felépített 2 különálló ikerházat. A KCR szerint a lakások címe valószínűleg Szirmos utca 8. A épület 1. ajtó formában van, amit a lakók egyszerűen csak 8/A/1-ként tábláztak ki. OSM szempontjából kétféleképpen szokták ezt jelölni. Az egyik jelölés, hogy megy az egész a házszámba (mint itt), a másik jelölés pedig az addr:housenumber=8 + addr:unit=A/1. Erre és arra is van példa bőven.
gabro00 (2023-06-21 09:52:47+00:00): A jelenlegi azért necces, mert a perjel opcionális és a 8A1 cím szerintem nehezen értelmezhető itthon, ezért az utóbbit preferálom.
urbalazs (2023-06-21 10:01:35+00:00): Írd át nyugodtan. Hasonlót találsz még a XXII. kerületi Karéj utcában, illetve az általad preferált változatra van példa a XXII. kerületi Endresz György utcában. Érdemes lenne összeszedni a hasonlókat, és egyben egységesíteni.
gabro00 (2023-06-21 10:22:24+00:00): Ha ilyen jól definiált a formátum, talán pár sor módosításával meg tudom szkriptelni a helyzetet. Csak ne felejtsem el :)
Taya_S (2023-06-21 10:00:56+00:00): Hallo Brainworkz,

Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Groeten,
Taya
skquinn (2023-06-21 08:09:41+00:00): Hi,

It is completely unnecessary to create a new account for each new addition to the map. This is at least the sixth such account that I have seen (I haven't kept count).

If this is the same person/entity behind the other accounts, then you need to read *all* of these changeset comments:

https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/123612496
https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/125044254
https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/125006110
https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/124713946

In particular, opening_hours is using entirely the wrong format, the phone number is also in an incorrect format, and "Category" is not a standard tag. If these continue being added with obvious deficiencies and blatantly nonstandard tagging, you risk having them being deleted entirely as spam.
user_5359 (2023-06-23 06:46:20+00:00): Hello! Please take a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1020368358 (one of fifty ways). What is the mean of the tag і = Хатынь ?
LidaCity (2023-06-23 09:43:28+00:00): fix (count 50)
kogutowicz-mano (2023-07-19 04:10:47+00:00): Szia!
Attól tartok ez így nem jó. Egyrészt felesleges (elnagyoltan) körberajzolni a napelemeket az erőművön belül. Ezen mondjuk lehetne vitatkozni. De az biztos, hogy ez a görbe nem lesz belső határvonala a napelemfarmnak, amit multipoligonná alakítottál. Légy szíves ezeket a szerkesztéseket mindenhol visszacsinálni!
Krisz0609 (2023-07-19 06:43:57+00:00): Szia!
Az alábbi wiki alapján: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:generator:source=solar
van a plant:source tag, ami a napelempark határát jelzi, és van a generator:source, ami csak a napelem sávokat jelenti, ez alapján vittem fel az adataim, a multipoligon valóban szükségtelen elismerem, illetve a belső határvonalakat is javítom, de nem törlöm magukat a belső határokat!
kogutowicz-mano (2023-07-19 07:02:11+00:00): Mondottam volt, ezen lehet vitatkozni.
A kulcsszavak: "elnagyoltan", illetve "The _individual_ rows of the solar panel within the solar field".
Nem az áll a wikiben, hogy rajzold körbe a területet, amit a napelemek sora a nap során valamikor beárnyékol. Hanem az egyes panelsorokat külön-külön felrajzolhatod, ha van energiád. Tehát itt Százhalombattán mintegy 400 objektumot.
Még valami: rosszul használod a name=* taget is. Lásd https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name :
Do not use name=* if: 
...
* The feature is known by a generic term or description.