piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Sotavento (2023-05-15 19:25:08+00:00): Keine Ahnung,  muss ich vor noch prüfen.
Grüße
Shaun das Schaf (2023-05-17 19:46:57+00:00): Hallo plovet, willkommen bei OSM!

Der Tag "access=no" bezieht sich auf die gesetzlichen Zugangsbeschränkungen. So wie ich das rauslese, gibt es aber kein Verbotsschild, sondern der Weg ist einfach komplett zugewachsen, "access=no" wäre dann nicht richtig.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access

In so einem Fall ist es auch kein Problem, den Weg einfach komplett rauszulöschen.

Alternativ könntest du das "highway=track" durch "abandoned:highway=track" ersetzen, dann ist klar, dass es sich um einen aufgegebenen Weg handelt und er wird auch nicht mehr in der Karte dargestellt.

Viele Grüße
Shaun das Schaf
aceman444 (2023-05-14 20:22:40+00:00): Zdravim, a to na zaklade useku Terna-Sedlo Straze je naozaj spravne zmenit farbu znacky pre celu "Medzinárodná diaľková turistická trasa E8, Slovensko" az po Bratislavu z cerveno bielej na modro-zltu? Skontrolujte si tuto zmenu.
brightj (2025-10-13 15:31:33+00:00): Strava heatmap shows Belleview area path going up and around Belleview Slab.  Do you know if that's the correct trail?  There's definitely a trail from the top of Belleview Slab over to Bella Vista slab, but going straight down from there on 2025-10-11 was basically just buttsliding down leaves in the woods, no clear trail. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1441920173
George S (2025-10-13 18:02:31+00:00): I haven't been on that path so I don't know. I don't recall making a change there, but if I did it was probably based on STRAVA or other GPX source.
George S (2025-10-13 18:09:30+00:00): From https://www.mountainproject.com/area/107795033/bella-vista-slab

Getting There 
Either climb something on the Belleview Slab or walk around it climber's left and scramble up a steep gully. From the top of the Belleview, walk 120' climber's left to the base of this slab.
George S (2025-10-13 18:13:34+00:00): This shows some of paths (I think the yellow dashed lines) 

https://www.adirondackrock.com/vol2_166-173.pdf?srsltid=AfmBOoqc8F7DtRSLmideaNEX_yq1DyoCgeKkEJthwhgXz1gIJ9FUhcGq
StefanB (2023-06-12 07:41:24+00:00): Please note, that most of these buildings were demolished and all orthophotos aren't up to date yet.
See one that is: https://www.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?basemapUrl=https%3A%2F%2Fgis06.ljubljana.si%2Farcgis%2Frest%2Fservices%2FPodloge%2FDOF_2022_D96%2FMapServer&source=sd
StefanB (2023-06-12 07:47:33+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137232074
googlenaut (2023-06-15 07:58:18+00:00): if ALL orthophotos aren't up to date .. it's impossible to map anything. So this task had to be removed from MapRoulette.
StefanB (2023-06-15 10:31:02+00:00): Well, it just happens, that in Ljubljana there is a newer version of orthophoto available, published by the city.
That one is also available in JOSM editor, but apparently not used detect missing building tasks for maproulette.

I have marked the task https://maproulette.org/browse/challenges/39264 as not an issue with link to new orthophoto to hopefully prevent such mishaps in future.
StefanB (2023-06-15 10:32:31+00:00): There might be similar problem near https://maproulette.org/challenge/39264/task/162489719 where a massive demolition and rebuilding is being done.
harumiusinc (2023-05-15 16:26:29+00:00): 色タグは細かすぎるので削除もやむを得ないと思いますが、start_date(供用開始日)とyear_of_construction(竣工日)は別であることがあるので理解お願いしますね。
lipuma (2023-05-15 17:37:43+00:00): 申し訳ありません、十分に注意していませんでした。 ご返信ありがとうございます。次回はもっと注意を払います！
NorthCrab_upload (2023-05-14 20:30:16+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/888853305

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
zorglubu (2023-05-31 09:03:18+00:00): Bonjour Lucinux85500, je commençais à corriger des codes Fantoir qui me sont signalés en erreur dans Josm, mais j'ai un petit doute sur ce que je fais.
Les codes Fantoir que tu as saisis récemment commencent par 850159 au lieu de 85159 comme indiqué ici : 
https://bano.openstreetmap.fr/pifometre/index.html#insee=85159&tab=1

Quel outil utilises-tu pour importer les adresses (moi j'utilise Pifomètre) ? Merci.
Lucinux85500 (2023-06-01 15:39:33+00:00): Bonjour Zorglubu,

Perso je récupère les codes FANTOIR ici :

https://www.collectivites-locales.gouv.fr/competences/la-mise-disposition-gratuite-du-fichier-des-voies-et-des-lieux-dits-fantoir

Pour chaque région il y a un fichier Zip et dans chaque fichier Zip un fichier texte par département.

Le 0 correspond au code direction . Si tu tapes explication code FANTOIR dans un moteur de recherches, tu pourras trouver un fichier explicatif sur le site : https://data.economie.gouv.fr/

Extrait du document :

2.2. Codes département et direction Le code direction sert à distinguer les départements d’outre-mer dont la codification est sur trois caractères : 971 Guadeloupe, 972 Martinique, 973 Guyane, 974 La Réunion, 976 Mayotte. Pour les autres départements, le code direction est égal à 0, à l’exception de quatre départements : Paris (754 à 758), les Bouches-du-Rhône (131, 132), le Nord (591, 592) et les Hauts-de-Seine (921, 922). En effet, si les directions locales des finances publiques ont toutes aujourd’hui une compétence départementale, tel n’a pas toujours été le cas et cette information reste encore présente dans le fichier.

2.3. Identifiant de la voie L’identifiant de la voie se compose : 1. des codes département et direction sur 3 caractères ; 2. du code commune INSEE sur 3 caractères ; 3. du code RIVOLI proprement dit sur 4 caractères + clé ; Exemple : 450 002 3086

Quand je lis le document le 0 me semble nécessaire.

Cordialement.

Lucinux85500
Lucinux85500 (2023-06-01 16:05:06+00:00): Suite explication.

J'avais également remarqué cette absence du 0 sur les données du pifomètre, mais après avoir fait des recherches pour comprendre de quoi était composé le code FANTOIR et avoir remarqué que d'autres contributeurs taggaient également le code FANTOIR avec le 0 du code direction, j'avais décidé de faire pareil.
Cordialement.
Lucinux85500 (2023-06-02 12:50:23+00:00): Bonjour Zorglubu,

Du coup, qu'as tu décidé, et quelle est selon toi la bonne pratique ? Avec le 0 du code direction ou sans ?
Cordialement.
Lucinux85500
zorglubu (2023-06-02 13:23:52+00:00): Pardonne-moi, je suis un peu long à répondre.
Je propose de demander l'avis des spécialistes Fantoir (ce que je ne suis pas) sur le forum OSM-FR, pour comprendre ce que représente ce zéro.
Avec ton accord je peux faire référence à cette discussion.
Lucinux85500 (2023-06-02 13:30:38+00:00): Pas de problème, je pense aussi que c'est peut-être la meilleure décision afin que tout le monde traite le code FANTOIR de la même façon.
Cordialement.
zorglubu (2023-06-02 14:31:06+00:00): En tentant de comprendre ces fichiers que tu cites, je suis tombé là-dessus (https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/dernier-fantoir-et-consequences/12795) qui répond à mes interrogations :
"Un changement cependant : le « code FANTOIR » que l’on manipule dans OSM sur 10 caractères ne sera plus fournit que sur 9. Le dernier caractère (la clé de contrôle) n’est plus fourni, et un des constituants du calcul de cette clé (le code « direction ») n’est plus fourni non plus."

Avec une référence vers (https://www.data.gouv.fr/fr/datasets/objet-disparition-des-fichiers-fantoir-fimoca-et-fimoct-en-juillet-2023-mise-en-place-des-fichiers-topo-structures-uamissions-competences-et-acheminement/) qui annonce la disparition prochaine de Fantoir.

Donc pour rester cohérents avec ceux qui suivent tout ça, je suggère de faire les imports via Pifomètre (cf https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:France/Int%C3%A9gration_des_adresses_avec_les_outils_BANO) et de suivre les avis d'erreur de Josm ;-)

Cordialement.
Lucinux85500 (2023-06-02 15:29:43+00:00): Effectivement en fouillant sur le forum je suis tombé sur le lien que tu indiques. Au vu de la discussion je suis OK, je ne mettrai plus le code direction.
Cordialement.
eggie (2023-05-14 20:55:57+00:00): Dag bavarillo  
motor_vehicle=no hoort niet op een paaltje. Dus beter verwijderen. 

De meeste accesstags zijn al ingebakken.
We taggen juist de uitzonderingen
mopde=yes
mofa=yes
evt
horse=yes ,
want die worden nu tegengehouden.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-05-14 20:58:40+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Tag:barrier%3Dbollard

Sinds de discussie zou die uitzondering van dei gemotoriseerde tweewielers wel eens aangepast kunnen zijn.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Tag:barrier%3Dbollard
Impliceert

    area=no
    access=no
    foot=yes
    bicycle=yes
    mofa=yes
    moped=yes
Zie forumdiscussie en consensus:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mofa-moped-no-op-barrier-bollard/98485
eggie (2023-05-14 21:02:22+00:00): motor_vehicle=no heb ik verwijderd.  Dat is dus ingebakken.
Pascal_a_velo (2023-05-15 13:49:10+00:00): Attention ; Adresses de maisons non modifies. Je laisse faire les cartographes. Merci a eux
ALu68 (2023-05-15 14:07:49+00:00): Hello  Shnouda Youssef,

welcome to OSM.

Unfortunately, your edits are very chaotic, double defined lines, nodes misplaced, keys used just by imagine.

PLEASE read the wiki first, before you continue!

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice


https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building
GerdP (2023-09-25 06:34:21+00:00): Moin aus Wildeshausen!
Ich frage mich, warum Du hier addr:street entfernt hast und nicht addr:place. Die Straßen sind tatsächlich mit dem Namen ausgeschildert, zumindest die, die von der "Deckauer Masch" abgehen. Die Numerierung ist auch durchgehend normal.
GerdP (2023-09-25 08:56:53+00:00): Es ging mit zunächst um Deckau. Bei Ihlbrock scheint es aber genau so sein. Hab ich was übersehen?
Ropino (2023-09-25 09:54:07+00:00): Hi,
es darf gern auch 'place' weg und dafür 'street' hin. 
Ich fand es doppelt nicht richtig und das Ortsnamen auch wirklich als Straßennamen beschildert werden ist für mich eher selten.
Wenn es hier so ist, kann es gern geändert werden.
VG
GerdP (2023-09-25 10:47:54+00:00): Für mich stellt sich da eher die Frage, ob statt addr:place evtl. addr:suburb gemeint war. Ich bin da zwar lang geradelt, aber habe sonst keine Ortskenntnis.
GerdP (2023-09-26 08:23:08+00:00): Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141762313 und  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141762360
Bei Dreeke habe ich nicht genug Infos, es scheint aber addr:place richtig zu sein und der Straßenname Dreeke an diversen highway ist vermutlich falsch weil nicht so ausgeschildert.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-07-02 11:55:10+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10897234924/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
suchAnight (2023-06-30 21:38:55+00:00): Hello Estxl6666, I am contacting you about some ferry modeling  in the country of COL. I noticed that some of the ferry routes like the Vía fluvial del Río Magdalena ferry (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1182595305) terminate in the middle of river without connecting to a feature for on/off boarding. The Vía fluvial del Rio Magdalena ferry route (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1172841020) crosses through to a river island. Is this the intended termination point? It seems to not be destination of any kind.
The OSM wiki for ferry modeling states that a ferry route should connect to a highway feature often times connecting at a man_made=pier: "pier is modeled as a linear way, add a highway=* tag to the pier, and if the pier is modeled as an area, create a separate highway=* feature that connects the ferry terminal to the greater road network” & "The ferry route must not branch in the water, so the route must always be drawn to the ferry dock. This is important for routing to work correctly.” (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route%3Dferry). The wiki also states that "the ferry should begin and end at an amenity= ferry_terminal" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dferry_terminal). Is there any plan to connect these to ferry terminals? Thank you for your time.
suchAnight (2023-06-30 21:44:54+00:00): Hola Estxl6666, me pongo en contacto con usted sobre un modelo de ferry en el país de COL. Noté que algunas de las rutas de ferry como el ferry Vía fluvial del Río Magdalena (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1182595305) terminan en medio del río sin conectarse a una función para subir/bajar. La ruta de ferry de la Vía fluvial del Río Magdalena (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1172841020) cruza hasta una isla fluvial. ¿Es este el punto de terminación previsto? Parece no ser destino de ningún tipo.
El wiki de OSM para el modelado de transbordadores establece que una ruta de transbordador debe conectarse a una característica de carretera que a menudo se conecta en un muelle hecho por el hombre: "el muelle se modela como una vía lineal, agregue una etiqueta de carretera = * al muelle, y si el muelle es modelado como un área, cree una función highway=* independiente que conecte la terminal del ferry con la red de carreteras más grande” & "La ruta del ferry no debe bifurcarse en el agua, por lo que la ruta siempre debe dibujarse en el muelle del ferry. Esto es importante para que el enrutamiento funcione correctamente”. (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:ruta%3Dferry). El wiki también establece que "el ferry debe comenzar y terminar en amenity= ferry_terminal" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dferry_terminal). ¿Hay algún plan para conectarlos a las terminales de ferry? Gracias por tu tiempo.
rodolfovargas (2023-05-16 01:33:49+00:00): Hola :)

Hay una discución de cómo mapear los TERRENOS (en Bolivia son los lotes o las parcelas urbanas). En este caso, lo que se tiene mapeado es el LOTE, y se tiene que utiliza el TAG: place=plot.
Los EDIFICIOS son los que si llevan los TAGs especificos (ejem. building=government)

No cometiste ningú herror en tu mapeo, solo te comento para otros casos.

Saludos.
Jayden26 (2023-05-14 21:19:23+00:00): Sorry, I DID NOT edit all the way to Newnan and McDonugh, I only edited somewhere on the Clayton/Fayette county line.
jmarchon (2023-05-14 21:26:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136101734
jmarchon (2023-05-14 21:27:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136101745
jmarchon (2023-05-14 21:27:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136101754
jmarchon (2023-05-14 21:27:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136101759
jmarchon (2023-05-14 21:28:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136101767
jmarchon (2023-05-14 21:28:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136101776
jmarchon (2023-05-14 21:28:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136101784
jmarchon (2023-05-14 21:29:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136101794
jmarchon (2023-05-14 21:29:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136101805
jmarchon (2023-05-14 21:30:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136101808
jmarchon (2023-05-14 21:30:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136101816
jmarchon (2023-05-14 21:30:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136101823
jmarchon (2023-05-14 21:32:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136101859
jmarchon (2023-05-14 21:32:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136101865
jmarchon (2023-05-14 21:32:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136101874
jmarchon (2023-05-14 21:33:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136101876
jmarchon (2023-05-14 21:33:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136101880
jmarchon (2023-05-14 21:33:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136101883
jmarchon (2023-05-14 21:33:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136101890
NorthCrab_upload (2023-05-14 21:40:24+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/825288067
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1172850678

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
moosfrosch (2023-05-17 17:40:03+00:00): Wieso ist das militärisch?
Zahlenfuchs (2023-05-17 18:29:47+00:00): Da ich keine andere passende Sperrzone gefunden habe und in der Schweiz schon mehrere behördlich angeordnete Naturgefahrensperrzonen identisch erfasst sind, habe ich diese so erfasst. Bin aber offen für eine passendere Sperrzone.
Hugoren Martinako (2023-11-08 10:52:31+00:00): Buenas, en este changeset introduciste varios caminos dentro del bosque etiquetados como highway=residential, entiendo que se tratan de errores, no? serán highway=track
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136102044
ottwiz (2023-05-18 19:30:14+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1232849

Did you intend to change only a smaller forest area?
In the near future this multipolygon will be destroyed and redrawn due to its inaccuracy. Please double check what you're editing before uploading.
ottwiz (2023-05-18 19:31:48+00:00): The reason i'm saying this because this multipolygon itself is a forest landcover, and for other areas please create a new polygon.
FYI, for changes like this JOSM (https://josm.openstreetmap.de/) should be used
ottwiz (2023-05-19 07:45:28+00:00): Nevertheless, I reverted that huge forest multipolygon so it displays properly on the map.
eteb3 (2024-07-31 09:49:34+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for your detailed changeset comment. As you surveyed the area, you may be able to help with my comment on my note here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4359949

In any case, re the name of the church: it does seem to go by many names (even before we mention the Welsh ones), but I wonder if it should really be "St Issui Church". The site you link to has "St Issui", which would be normal - (eg, St Mary's, St Peter's). Do you recall what it's called on the ground, since that is OSM default as I understand it?

Happy mapping.

eteb3
eteb3 (2024-07-31 09:52:46+00:00): Ah, in 2021 Geograph had "Church of St Issui" signed on the lychgate (Patricio being Partrishow in Welsh, and probably not part of the name).

https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/6803384
literan (2023-05-15 20:25:45+00:00): на здании дублировать не нужно. Поправлю
NorthCrab_upload (2023-05-14 22:20:17+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2085829576
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1172866731

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
literan (2023-05-15 20:19:46+00:00): но зачем "пришпиливать" общими точками дорожку к границе зоны landuse?
jmarchon (2023-05-15 05:02:13+00:00): Nice work! Welcome to OSM!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136102960
jmarchon (2023-05-15 05:05:15+00:00): After taking a closer look, I noticed you may have used the wrong tag for these footpaths. I recommend using highway=path, not route=foot as that is meant for relations.
OldManCelli (2023-06-08 14:30:35+00:00): Thanks for all the work on the interior of Ablah Library! Just a couple requests:
1) could you please review https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_Indoor_Tagging and the examples listed? Please note that walls are lines, not areas. Also, walls for rooms should be connected and simplified a bit from how you mapped them.
2) The use of amenity=chair seems like it might be misused here... Please note that amenity=chair is a chair that doesn't move (is fixed in one place) see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=chair
adrianojbr (2023-05-18 00:13:45+00:00): Olá, Raphaelkaart!

O que você tem contra as highway=service?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136103065
user_18305684 (2023-05-15 13:18:34+00:00): Hi,

to work, a multipolygon should have no tags on the outer way : tags are on the relation, see wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon

I fixed it.

Best regards
Elli21486 (2023-05-15 21:31:31+00:00): Thanks for that. Noticed something was wrong and could not figure out what it was.
yelisey90 (2023-05-15 08:17:41+00:00): The names that you entered differ from those shown on https://maps.gov.ge/map/portal (second layer out of four).
ftrebien (2024-10-25 13:55:28+00:00): O mapa 6 é de ocupação. A classificação viária no OSM deve ser feita aproximando as classes funcionais (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brazil/Classifica%C3%A7%C3%A3o_das_rodovias_do_Brasil) que constam no mapa 10 (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Iju%C3%AD/Sistema_Vi%C3%A1rio#Santa_Rosa). Mas a opinião geral da comunidade é de que a classificação oficial tem que ser avaliada também conforme as condições reais no entorno (ex.: sinalização viária), pois muitas vezes o que foi planejado ainda não foi completamente executado.
emersonveenstra (2023-05-15 10:52:55+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for your edits, however I'm going to be reverting this as there are several errors and inaccuracies with it:

1. You added two motorway_link ways as basically a separate turn lane when there's no physical separation, which is not allowed.
2. There's six different traffic lights, so routers would apply incorrect penalties for stopping
3. The destination, destination:ref, and destination:street values are inconsistent and some of them are wrong.
4. The primary/secondary road switch is now in the wrong place because it doesn't connect to a motorway link.

I don't know exactly what it was like before this change, so it might still need to be fixed, but please double check to make sure that what you're doing is a correct way to map. Thanks!

(reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136120750)
Stévan Corre (2023-05-14 23:23:19+00:00): Set maxweight=44
Stévan Corre (2023-05-14 23:25:58+00:00): Set maxweight=44
Stévan Corre (2023-05-14 23:48:40+00:00): Set maxweight=44
Stévan Corre (2023-05-14 23:49:24+00:00): Set maxweight=44
Jemiz_01 (2023-05-19 12:31:01+00:00): Great work
int03 (2023-05-22 22:24:23+00:00): Thanks.  I was glad to finally get some names for some of those schools.
rik_ (2023-05-16 06:01:39+00:00): Hi Toliman,

kurze Frage zum Sendemast[1] hinter dem alten Senderhaus:

Du hast ihm in diesem Changeset den Namen "Funkturm Königs Wusterhausen" gegeben. Ist das ein offizieller Name? Kann man das irgendwo nachschlagen?

Viele Grüße

rik


[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8622433840
mariotomo (2023-05-15 08:11:17+00:00): hola. ese "name=Teatro", es un teatro sin nombre, o un cínema que se llama "Teatro"? y no sería también un 'building'?
mariotomo (2023-05-15 08:18:24+00:00): la forma del techo del edificio, cuidado con tus errores de teclado: podría ser "gabled" 
por cuanto de la foto aérea diría que parte del edificio tiene techo plano.