piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
bxl-forever (2024-11-23 00:54:45+00:00): Definitely not a "bump" here
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12366079531
On aerial imagery I see a speed table instead.
TrickyFoxy (2024-11-23 18:22:38+00:00): 👋 А что с полем? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/184285148
CurlingMan13 (2024-11-23 07:02:13+00:00): Changeset reverted.

See:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16899
bxl-forever (2024-11-23 00:56:55+00:00): Hello,

man_made=charging_point is only if you want to micromap the plug itself.

To map a logical device, the correct tag on OSM is: amenity=charging_station
ÔMan (2024-11-23 11:08:28+00:00): Okay, noted.
ChrissW-R1 (2025-01-05 14:00:20+00:00): Please check the discussion at https://osm.org/changeset/144241163
eggie (2024-11-22 22:29:29+00:00): Je plakt hier een weg op een fietspad. Dat werkt niet in OSM. We noemen dat duplicated ways.
Er loopt hier weer een fietsroute die je niet kunt bewerken met editor iD.
Ik heb je opgeplakte weg verwijderd.
Gr eggie
eggie (2024-11-22 22:32:32+00:00): Wanneer de hoofdrijbaan op slot staat met microcar=no waarom dan van die aftakkingen met microcar=yes.   Hoe gaat die routering dan ooit werken. Is dat om een bussluis te omzeilen?
eggie (2024-11-22 22:53:10+00:00): Ik heb microcar=yes weer toegevoegd.. ook over de bypass.
Qwajo OSM (2025-04-18 23:00:46+00:00): This should be check, I do not know which kind of water was mapped here.
Enock4seth (2025-04-19 17:13:54+00:00): What should be checked?
Qwajo OSM (2025-04-19 18:11:55+00:00): Some kind of 'water' has been mapped in the area, and it's intersecting with buildings and other features.
silvio3105 (2024-11-22 22:57:35+00:00): ISPRAVKA - Kamera DUGOPOLJE, ul. Bleiburških žrtava, nasuprot zgrade s kbr. 11; ŽC 6260
zhiar590 (2024-11-23 15:25:02+00:00): Hi
Thank you for the edit and fixing the mistakes i did.
 just a little note: Kalar is part of an administration called Garmyan administration which is like a governorate consists of few districts 
https://ckb.wikipedia.org/wiki/ئیدارەی_گەرمیان
i couldnt find in english you can use translator if you want to read.
thank you
LockOnGuy (2024-11-23 15:28:29+00:00): See the first link. It’s called Garmyan Region in English.
LockOnGuy (2024-11-23 15:30:21+00:00): Here is the link you was searching for: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garmian_Region
zhiar590 (2024-11-23 15:32:16+00:00): oh right thank you
eteb3 (2026-05-31 11:51:02+00:00): Hi Merzof,

Thanks for adding several mosques around Oldham.

And forgive me if I've messaged you before about this.

Awkwardly, building=mosque is reserved for purpose-built mosque buildings, and doesn't indicate anythnig about the current use.

I'm trying to make the mosques data as complete as possible, and I wonder if you could use amenity=place_of_worhip +religion=Muslim if you find any more?

If purpose built, they can also have building=mosque - but from aerial it looks like some you've added are just ancillary buildings with no special architecture

I may have this wrong tho - please let me know if so

Happy mapping
Merzof (2026-06-25 09:52:56+00:00): Hi eteb,

Thanks for pointing this out, yes I think you're right and I will use the amenity + religion combo in the future.

Cheers!
Jordi MF (2024-11-22 23:49:25+00:00): Se han revertido todos los changesets de este usuario porque es un usuario bloqueado decenas de veces con cuentas múltiples (https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/usuarios-editando-en-espana-bajo-sospecha-vandalismo-malas-practicas-y-otros/2510/), por lo que sistemáticamente incumple los Términos de Uso de OSM (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenStreetMap_account#Account_Names_and_Multi_Account_Policies y https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Terms_of_Use#VI._Account_cancellation_or_suspension).
El usuario realiza múltiples y pequeñas ediciones para dificultar que sus cambios puedan ser revisados. Los mayores errores son que modifica la toponimia oficial para que no aparezca en valenciano aunque así lo dictamine la Acadèmia Valenciana de la Llengua en la cartografía oficial de la Comunitat Valenciana. Tenemos permiso explícito de esta entidad que, según las leyes autonómicas, es la entidad encargada de la toponimia oficial. Tampoco no tiene en cuenta la cartelería local que aparece en calles, carreteras y sendas.
Por otra parte, este usuario (y todas sus cuentas) está mapeando según las ortofotos y sin tener en cuenta el conocimiento local para delimitar si los elementos se tratan de edificios en ruinas, muros u otros elementos e, incluso, elimina PDIs con todo el historial de forma injustificada.
Ante todo lo expuesto y por las diversas anomalías, revierto todos los changesets porque, de revisar cada uno de ellos, únicamente nos dedicaríamos a ello, como si fuésemos administradores. En caso de revisar todas las ediciones de este usuario que ya ha sido bloqueado por 10 años con otras cuentas, nunca podríamos seguir mejorando la base de datos debido a revisar durante horas cada uno de los conjuntos de cambios y, por lo tanto, dejaríamos de lado seguir mapeando para añadir nueva información.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159479211
blackboxlogic (2025-08-21 19:38:47+00:00): You connected a dirt road to a highway and didn't set any access restriction so routers are sending traffic along it to get on and off the highway

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1336975369/history
Wilhem275 (2024-11-22 23:47:52+00:00): Come spiegato nel changeset, la classificazione della strada risponde ai requisiti stabiliti dalla comunità per le strade trunk.
Se non si si è d'accordo con questa classificazione, per favore, PRIMA di fare l'ennesima modifica esprimete le vostre perplessità in questa discussione: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/utilizzo-del-tag-highway-trunk-in-italia/101471
eggie (2024-11-23 07:46:15+00:00): Dag yrm

Wanneer een bedrijf sluit zal dan ook het adres verdwijnen?
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=159479151

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-11-23 07:51:26+00:00): Adresnode 60 hersteld
yrcimim (2024-11-23 16:55:14+00:00): Was inderdaad te bot. Hoe kan ik het ongedaan maken en het verbeteren?

Of kan jij het ongedaan maken en dat ik daarna alleen de functie verwijder.

Je kan het ook allemaal zelf doen, maar dan leer ik hier niks van...
eggie (2024-11-23 17:03:05+00:00): Ik heb mijn eigen reparatie weer verwijderd.
Dus een revert uitgevoerd. 

Dan kun je het zelf proberen. 

Ik heb gewoon een adresnode geleend van dat riedeltje dat op elkaar ligt. Daarvan één gekopieerd en toen het 'huis'nummer aangepast.

Doe je het zelf.

Wat ook kan is je eigen changeset reverten en dan de adresnode ontdoen van de bedrijfsinfo. Zo zou het eigenlijk 'moeten'.
Reverten doe je met een reverterplugin in editor josm.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-11-23 18:16:11+00:00): En nu heb ik het weer teruggedraaid tot het moment dat jij aan de slag wilde gaan.
Dus nu één restaurant verwijderen (dat heeft geen adres)  en de BAG adresnode leegmaken van de bedrijfsgegevens.
Up to you.
eggie (2024-11-23 18:18:01+00:00): Wat leesvoer
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/Reverter

en de betere editor josm
editor josm stap voor stap
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/editor-josm-stap-voor-stap/75047
eggie (2024-11-29 21:43:08+00:00): De horeca-bedrijven heb ik nu verwijderd. De adresnode intact gelaten.
MVG
eggie
Jordi MF (2024-11-23 18:01:41+00:00): Se han revertido todos los changesets de este usuario porque es un usuario bloqueado decenas de veces con cuentas múltiples (https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/usuarios-editando-en-espana-bajo-sospecha-vandalismo-malas-practicas-y-otros/2510/), por lo que sistemáticamente incumple los Términos de Uso de OSM (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenStreetMap_account#Account_Names_and_Multi_Account_Policies y https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Terms_of_Use#VI._Account_cancellation_or_suspension).
El usuario realiza múltiples y pequeñas ediciones para dificultar que sus cambios puedan ser revisados. Los mayores errores son que modifica la toponimia oficial para que no aparezca en valenciano aunque así lo dictamine la Acadèmia Valenciana de la Llengua en la cartografía oficial de la Comunitat Valenciana. Tenemos permiso explícito de esta entidad que, según las leyes autonómicas, es la entidad encargada de la toponimia oficial. Tampoco no tiene en cuenta la cartelería local que aparece en calles, carreteras y sendas.
Por otra parte, este usuario (y todas sus cuentas) está mapeando según las ortofotos y sin tener en cuenta el conocimiento local para delimitar si los elementos se tratan de edificios en ruinas, muros u otros elementos e, incluso, elimina PDIs con todo el historial de forma injustificada.
Ante todo lo expuesto y por las diversas anomalías, revierto todos los changesets porque, de revisar cada uno de ellos, únicamente nos dedicaríamos a ello, como si fuésemos administradores. En caso de revisar todas las ediciones de este usuario que ya ha sido bloqueado por 10 años con otras cuentas, nunca podríamos seguir mejorando la base de datos debido a revisar durante horas cada uno de los conjuntos de cambios y, por lo tanto, dejaríamos de lado seguir mapeando para añadir nueva información.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159509865
Peter Newman (2024-11-23 14:27:56+00:00): This was driven by my note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4111778
NorthCrab_upload (2024-11-23 01:11:00+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, zamień addr:place na addr:city. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12366283080
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12366283081
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12366283082

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
antimuscovy (2025-04-26 03:30:04+00:00): запам'ятай є домовленість більшості членів української спільноти - керівник української спільноти andygol тобі об яснить    -  згідно цієї домовленості межі села картографуються у вигляді мультиполігону тобто type=multypoligon 
Те що ти у селы Темянець мультиполігон замінив на admin_level =10 є порушенням домовленостей української спільноти
Друге admin_level 10 застосорвуэться лише для районів великих міст тобто Голосіївський район Деснянський та решта районКиєва Корабельний район Херсона Богунський район Житомира 
Для меж міст та сіл викоритовувався admin level 9
Mazda05 (2025-04-26 08:56:29+00:00): Добрий день.


Питання позначення меж населених пунктів та адміністративного поділу в цілому наразі обговорюється https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/topic/91585. Насьогодні є домовленність щодо admin_level=2/4/6. Щодо інших — спільнота на цей час не голосувала. andygol не є керівником української спільноти.


На цей час, щодо позначення населених пунктів, є пропозиція від andygol та моя, що також є тут https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Uk:Вікіпроект_Україна/Адміністративно-територіальний_устрій. Наші пропозиції обидві проти позначення меж населених пунктів як admin_level=9, тому що в районах міст можуть бути декілька населених пунктів, та в старостинських округах можуть бути декілька населених пунктів — andygol пропонує позначати райони міст та старостинські округи як admin_level=10, я пропоную позначати райони міст як admin_level=8, старостинські округи як admin_level=9. Жоден з нас не пропонуэ позначати межі населених пунктів як admin_level=9. Позначення меж населених пунктів за допомогою admin_level=9 здійснювалось, та де-якими учасниками здійснюється, на підставі попередньої домовленності, доки не будуть проголосовані інши пропозиції — https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:Вікіпроект_Україна/Адміністративно-територіальний_устрій.


Коли буде узгоджена та проголосована нова схема адміністративного поділу — буде масова заміна тегів. Це не є проблемою
Mazda05 (2025-04-26 10:13:35+00:00): Щодо саме цього https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18319267 об'єкту. Він був позначений не за схемою що пропоную я https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Uk:Вікіпроект_Україна/Адміністративно-територіальний_устрій#Пропонована_схема_позначень_#2, не за схемою, що пропонує andygol https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Uk:Вікіпроект_Україна/Адміністративно-територіальний_устрій#Пропонована_схема_позначень_#1, не за схемою, що була прийнята до цього https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:Вікіпроект_Україна/Адміністративно-територіальний_устрій. Тому я не розумію ваші хвилювання щодо цього. Ще раз нагадаю: коли буде прийнята якась схема позначення АТУ — будуть масові зміні всіх цих об'єктів відповідно до схеми, що буде проголосована
Mazda05 (2025-04-26 11:02:56+00:00): «Те що ти у селы Темянець мультиполігон замінив» Для цього села не було створено ані type=multipolygon, ані type=boundary. Будь ласка, ретельно подивіться на зміни в цьому наборі правок
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-11-23 02:44:25+00:00): reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159481302
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-11-23 02:40:12+00:00): Why were the traffic signals removed?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159480971
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-11-23 02:41:12+00:00): Fake rail
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159480984
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-11-23 02:44:26+00:00): reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159481302
dcapillae (2024-11-23 08:47:54+00:00): Buenos días.

Este conjunto de cambios fue revertido. Cada contenedor se destina a un tipo de residuo diferente, no se deben mezclar.

Contenedor azul (papel y cartón):
recycling:paper=yes
recycling:magazines=yes
recycling:cardboard=yes
recycling:newspaper=yes
recycling:paper_packaging=yes

Contenedor amarillo (latas, envases y botellas de plástico):
recycling:plastic_packaging=yes
recycling:plastic_bottles=yes
recycling:cans=yes

Contenedor verde (botellas de cristal):
recycling:glass_bottles=yes

Gracias por su colaboración.

Atentamente,
Daniel Capilla
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-11-23 02:43:28+00:00): Fake roads
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159481173
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-11-23 02:56:45+00:00): reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159481441
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-11-23 02:46:08+00:00): reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159481323
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-11-23 02:56:46+00:00): reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159481441
dpolovinkin (2025-03-26 15:35:22+00:00): hi, did you see how many warnings you got there when added those roads in airport?...
dpolovinkin (2025-04-11 18:45:21+00:00): hey, did you read my comment? I see you are active on OSM
Fizzie-DWG (2024-11-23 05:32:14+00:00): Please also see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16900
zzptichka (2024-11-23 22:21:45+00:00): Hi, `traffic_signals:direction` is a useful tag on two-way roads. No need to delete it.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:traffic_signals:direction
wordbird (2024-11-23 22:37:29+00:00): Sorry about that. I'll leave those. 

Since the traffic signal node is directly on a crosswalk, the direction was pointing backward on the road correctly but also in one direction only on the pedestrian crossing, which confused me.
nevw (2024-11-23 11:03:41+00:00): The parking multipolygon is probably valid as the ‘touching inner rings’ are valid under xml examples at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon
nevw (2024-11-23 11:07:23+00:00): The parking mp referred to above…
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18317038#map=16/-35.29544/149.18675&layers=D
mavl (2024-11-23 05:40:20+00:00): Здравствуйте. Сторонними картами нельзя пользоваться. Какими картами вы пользовались?
mavl (2024-11-23 05:55:03+00:00): Я взял на смелость восстановить удалённую дорогу, так как на спутниковых снимках (bing, esri) она есть.
rskedgell (2024-11-23 05:18:03+00:00): (Review requested)

Thanks for adding these and taking part in this project!

If I could make one suggestion, please could you avoid putting the kerb nodes on the sidewalks?

From https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dkerb
"Please do not add a barrier=kerb on a node joining the footways near the crossing (e.g. sidewalk footway joining with footway crossing the road). That would implicate that such kerbs block not only crossing the road, but also just using the sidewalk (i.e. without intending to cross the road), which is almost never the case - and which has a big implication for several classes of users (most notably, wheelchair users)."

Most kerbs in central London are lowered or flush, so it's not quite as bad for wheelchair users as the wiki makes it sound, but it does mean that tactile paving nodes for the visually impaired might be in the wrong place.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-18 14:17:08+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12366512463/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-18 14:17:35+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12366522911/history

is it shop=bicycle or shop=motorcycle ?
Gregory Peony (2025-04-14 00:56:55+00:00): All these footprints are valid, but oversized and should be squared (q).
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159482709
Gregory Peony (2025-03-31 15:12:13+00:00): This footprint is valid, accurate, and has been appropriately squared. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159482737
Gregory Peony (2025-07-12 16:19:49+00:00): You correctly identified that this is a T shaped building
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159482757
dragnet-meshes (2024-11-23 05:03:07+00:00): These cameras are evil and utterly UNCONSTITUTIONAL. 

FYI, these cameras upload NOT JUST your license plate, but using AI it immediately uploads photos and catalogs all distinguishing features of your vehicle to a database that is easily searched for anything. For example, "search for blue vehicles that passed here with a bumper sticker"

See a map of them on deflock.me
dragnet-meshes (2024-11-23 05:09:06+00:00): or, "where else across all the databases has this particular vehicle been seen?"

They claim it's not "live surveillance." but that is implying that you think it's NOT OK if someone is sitting there watching the camera feed, but that it's somehow OK if the camera logs ALL vehicle motion, ALL vehicle attributes, AND CORRELATES ALL movement by any particular vehicle in the future. 

Law enforcement is trying to convince you that something a million times worse of a privacy violation is actually good and not a violation at all. They juxtapose a straw man that no one would care about and say how this system is somehow OK because it logs everything to a super fast database?!?
Gregory Peony (2025-07-15 02:17:19+00:00): Remember that you're looking at roofs which sometimes have light and dark parts. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159482901
Gregory Peony (2025-07-12 16:18:37+00:00): You correctly identified buildings in the imagery here but the footprints could be more accurate. I flagged two footprints which I though were well mapped. It looks like you mapped using alternate imagery or an offset leading to a missalignment with ESRI. I corrected this.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159482984
Gregory Peony (2025-03-31 15:15:42+00:00): The building footprint should be round (press o after tagging). Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159482992
Mashin (2024-11-25 19:49:26+00:00): Hi Quincy,
I don't think this is a good idea.
First the network tag is for hiking routes is described having only lwn, rwn, nwn, iwn values.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route%3Dhiking
And second some data consumers depend on this values. Waymarkedtrails being one of them I think.
Cheers
Minh Nguyen (2024-11-25 20:20:50+00:00): Waymarked Trails does support the three-letter acronyms, but the developer isn’t a big fan of them: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/bike-route-networks-classification-icn-ncn-rcn-and-lcn/121700/36

There’s longstanding desire for reforming recreational network tagging in the U.S. I’m a bit amused that it started with this trail of all things. The forum thread above is going around in circles, but one takeaway is that the hikers aren’t happy that cyclists coined cycle_network=* and left behind the hikers a second time.
Mashin (2024-11-25 21:22:16+00:00): Sure. I also think that the current values scale very poorly for large countries like US, but how does it justify to do such dramatic change that will make the trails disappear from some maps? I missed discussion about this.

What is the idea for network values for the rest of the hiking trails countrywide? Are those values going to fix the hierarchy issue? Does that mean that global hiking map project will have to hardcode network values in order to infer hierarchy? 
I fear that the change will be done on the scenic trails, but nothing will be done for the rest and we end up with some nonfunctional cat-dog hybrid.
Minh Nguyen (2024-11-25 21:30:23+00:00): I agree that we should be consistent at least within the country rather than doing it piecemeal.

With the hierarchical network=* format as used on road routes, the hierarchical level is more or less the number of colons in the value, though less complicated countries would probably prefer the other format (e.g., fr:national). But this differs from the three-letter acronyms, which ostensibly indicate a zoom level range rather than any hierarchy per se.

For what it’s worth, this changeset moved the three-letter acronym to network:type=*, which is one of the ideas for preserving the ability of less sophisticated renderers to infer a reasonable zoom level.
quincylvania (2024-11-27 19:39:57+00:00): I opened an issue at Waymarked Trails to support three-letter classification acronyms in `network:type` as well as in `network`. https://github.com/waymarkedtrails/waymarkedtrails-backend/issues/16
Gregory Peony (2025-07-12 15:33:55+00:00): You improved the map data here by replacing oversized building footprints. The ones you added could still be more accurate, please remember to square footprints when appropriate.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159483108
Gregory Peony (2025-04-14 00:51:57+00:00): The footprints you added here envelope multiple buildings. A footprint should represent an individual building. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159483145