piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Szymson (2026-07-06 15:20:49+00:00): W Szemudzie przez większość roku jest wywieszona flaga Polski, flaga Kaszub jest wywieszana tylko w okresie jakichś wydarzeń/lokalnych świąt związanych z kaszubszczyzną. Obecnie jest to XXVII Światowy Zjazd Kaszubów który odbędzie się w sobotę w Gdyni.
czebureks (2026-07-06 15:28:59+00:00): Wygląda na to, że dysponujesz szerszą wiedzą lokalną na tym obszarze, więc nie będę oponował. :)
pitscheplatsch (2026-07-06 13:09:18+00:00): Hello, and welcome to OSM. Could you please explain the reason for deleting these driveway/service ways?

This changeset deletes several ways that were tagged as private/service driveways. In OSM, private driveways and private roads can still be mapped when they exist on the ground; they should normally be kept with appropriate tags such as highway=service, service=driveway, and access=private, rather than deleted just because they are private.

If these driveways no longer physically exist, or were clearly incorrect/misplaced, please mention the evidence/source. Otherwise, could you please restore the deleted driveways and keep the access restrictions instead? Thank you.
pitscheplatsch (2026-07-06 13:09:22+00:00): Hello, and welcome to OSM. Could you please explain the reason for deleting these driveway/service ways?

This changeset deletes several ways that were tagged as private/service driveways. In OSM, private driveways and private roads can still be mapped when they exist on the ground; they should normally be kept with appropriate tags such as highway=service, service=driveway, and access=private, rather than deleted just because they are private.

If these driveways no longer physically exist, or were clearly incorrect/misplaced, please mention the evidence/source. Otherwise, could you please restore the deleted driveways and keep the access restrictions instead? Thank you.
gmar5 (2026-07-06 13:54:29+00:00): Hi. Some of these edits to pharmacies, changed to amenity=hospital, don't seem correct.
pitscheplatsch (2026-07-06 13:09:27+00:00): Hello, and welcome to OSM. Could you please explain the reason for deleting these driveway/service ways?

This changeset deletes several ways that were tagged as private/service driveways. In OSM, private driveways and private roads can still be mapped when they exist on the ground; they should normally be kept with appropriate tags such as highway=service, service=driveway, and access=private, rather than deleted just because they are private.

If these driveways no longer physically exist, or were clearly incorrect/misplaced, please mention the evidence/source. Otherwise, could you please restore the deleted driveways and keep the access restrictions instead? Thank you.
eggie (2026-07-06 12:48:14+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  Kloppen die andere namen hier nog?
Un Bietje Groen en Flowerwise
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
MrtnHrdn (2026-07-06 17:25:06+00:00): Dank. Ja die kloppen.
eggie (2026-07-06 17:27:07+00:00): 👍
Bienson (2026-07-07 03:38:54+00:00): "Dr.med" fehlt das Leerzeichen.
eggie (2026-07-06 13:50:07+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
DressyPear4 (2026-07-07 12:35:52+00:00): Este changeset foi revertido com changeset/185262855
houtari (2026-07-09 06:16:23+00:00): Nuo crossing ja crossing:markings -merkinnät on muuten teiden risteyksiä ja suojateitä varten - ei siis tarkoitettu käytettäväksi tällaisten puron ylittävien polun "risteyksien" kanssa.
pitscheplatsch (2026-07-06 12:28:50+00:00): Hello, 
could you please discuss these edits with the Libya/local OSM community before making further mass changes to place names?

This changeset changes the main name=* of several cities/villages/places from the existing Arabic/local names to combined Tifinagh + Arabic labels, while the changeset source is “local knowledge; indigenous toponym restoration; Amazigh heritage”.

Adding verifiable Amazigh/Tifinagh names in the appropriate language-specific tags such as name:ber=* or name:zgh=* may be useful, but name=* should normally contain the current common/default local name of the feature, not a combined multilingual or restored/historical form unless that exact form is verifiably used on the ground and accepted by the local mapping community.

Could you please provide clear, verifiable sources for the changed main names, and revert the name=* changes where they are based on restoration/heritage rather than current common usage? 

Thank you.
pitscheplatsch (2026-07-06 13:53:16+00:00): Thank you for the detailed reply, I appreciate it.

Just to clarify: I am not a local contributor in Libya, and I am also not a specialist in multilingual name tagging, especially in a context involving Arabic and Amazigh/Tifinagh names. 

I noticed a larger number of name-related changes on important objects, so I thought it was appropriate to leave a changeset comment and ask for clarification.

Best regards, Pascal
pitscheplatsch (2026-07-06 12:30:51+00:00): Hello, 
could you please discuss these edits with the Libya/local OSM community before making further mass changes?

This changeset changes the main name=* of places to combined Tifinagh + Arabic labels. The source is given as “local knowledge; indigenous toponym restoration; Amazigh heritage”, but for OSM the main name=* should normally reflect the current common/default local name of the feature, not a combined multilingual or restored/historical form unless that exact form is verifiably used on the ground and accepted by the local mapping community.

Adding Amazigh/Tifinagh names in suitable language-specific tags such as name:ber=* / name:zgh=* may be appropriate if the values are verifiable. However, please do not replace established name=* values with combined-script names based on toponym restoration alone.

Could you please provide clear, verifiable sources and community consensus for the changed main names, and revert the name=* changes where the combined form is not the current commonly used name? 

Thank you.
pitscheplatsch (2026-07-06 13:53:25+00:00): Thank you for the detailed reply, I appreciate it.

Just to clarify: I am not a local contributor in Libya, and I am also not a specialist in multilingual name tagging, especially in a context involving Arabic and Amazigh/Tifinagh names. 

I noticed a larger number of name-related changes on important objects, so I thought it was appropriate to leave a changeset comment and ask for clarification.

Best regards, Pascal
Libya-truth (2026-07-06 14:25:20+00:00): Thank you
Supaplex (2026-07-06 17:22:00+00:00): 請勿隨意塗鴨，OpenStreetMap是共同編輯的線上地圖
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185195323
pitscheplatsch (2026-07-06 13:08:50+00:00): Hello, and welcome to OSM. Could you please explain the reason for deleting these driveway/service ways?

This changeset deletes several ways that were tagged as private/service driveways. In OSM, private driveways and private roads can still be mapped when they exist on the ground; they should normally be kept with appropriate tags such as highway=service, service=driveway, and access=private, rather than deleted just because they are private.

If these driveways no longer physically exist, or were clearly incorrect/misplaced, please mention the evidence/source. Otherwise, could you please restore the deleted driveways and keep the access restrictions instead? Thank you.
pitscheplatsch (2026-07-06 13:08:25+00:00): Hello, and welcome to OSM. Could you please explain the reason for deleting these driveway/service ways?

This changeset deletes several ways that were tagged as private/service driveways. In OSM, private driveways and private roads can still be mapped when they exist on the ground; they should normally be kept with appropriate tags such as highway=service, service=driveway, and access=private, rather than deleted just because they are private.

If these driveways no longer physically exist, or were clearly incorrect/misplaced, please mention the evidence/source. Otherwise, could you please restore the deleted driveways and keep the access restrictions instead? Thank you.
Marvk (2026-07-06 22:38:40+00:00): Hallo Thorsten, 

es wäre super, wenn du deine changesets mit einem kurzen Kommentar versiehst, unter anderem, damit du es anderen Mappern leichter machst, zu verstehen, was du warum geändert hast.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments#Warum_sollte_ich_%C3%84nderungssatz-Kommentare_nutzen?

Beste Grüße
Marv
pitscheplatsch (2026-07-06 13:08:07+00:00): Hello, and welcome to OSM. Could you please explain the reason for deleting these driveway/service ways?

This changeset deletes several ways that were tagged as private/service driveways. In OSM, private driveways and private roads can still be mapped when they exist on the ground; they should normally be kept with appropriate tags such as highway=service, service=driveway, and access=private, rather than deleted just because they are private.

If these driveways no longer physically exist, or were clearly incorrect/misplaced, please mention the evidence/source. Otherwise, could you please restore the deleted driveways and keep the access restrictions instead? Thank you.
rskedgell (2026-07-06 15:29:09+00:00): (Review requested)

Hi David,

In the UK, a highway=cycleway is generally assumed to be for both cyclists and pedestrians, unless it's got a foot=no access tag. It certainly doesn't hurt to add an explicit foot=yes on these.

Where there are sections of segregated cycle track, tagged with segregated=yes I would use highway=cycleway because it was built as one.

There are some shared pavements/sidewalks where the cycle "infrastructure" is just a blue shared path sign, some people prefer highway=footway + footway=sidewalk + bicycle=yes + segregated=no

Some people in the UK don't like highway=path because it can create ambiguity in routing and rendering. In other countries it's the de facto standard.

All the above is my own opinion. Some people will agree, others won't. You can feel free to ignore it, as the changes you have made are unlikely to break cycle or pedestrian routing.

The original mapping of these cycle tracks, done before you edited them, leaves a bit to be desired. They're not split at crossings and where the segregation ends and the "parent" streets like Horton Lane have incorrect or absent tags for sidewalk=* , cycleway=* and verge=* . There are even sections where the footway and cycle track seem to be physically separated by a grass strip rather than a painted white line, which I would probably map as a separate highway=footway and a highway=cycleway.

Rob
David W (VGN | LKD) (2026-07-06 17:53:40+00:00): Thanks Rob.

I thought i might take this on as my little OSM project.

Good to know there's more to fix ;-)
luiswoo (2026-07-09 20:45:10+00:00): Нет такого города, как "​Нахичевань м-н" -- последовательность должна быть обратной (если тут может быть что-то, кроме нп) нп, район, микрорайон. Принятое сокращение для микрорайона -- это "мкр.".
Alshowaiey (2026-07-23 22:20:36+00:00): تذكر اسم المحل بالعربي ايش؟
Growebis (2026-07-24 13:05:10+00:00): ما كان له اسم عربي على حسب ما أتذكر
eggie (2026-07-06 14:19:25+00:00): Dag Thomasje.. Geef svp aan wat je hebt gedaan.
Wat bedoel je met Voetpad? 

MVG
eggie
Thomasje (2026-07-06 15:18:42+00:00): Voetpaden aangemaakt rondom gebouwen Verheijstraat 2 en 4
eggie (2026-07-06 13:54:28+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  Wat is je bedoeling?  Wij willen een parkeerplaats ? Een parkeerplaats is geen gebouw. De tag voor zo'n parkeermogelijkheid is amenity=parking parking=street_side  orientation = parallel
capacity=?
name=Parkeerplaats hoort niet op de kaart.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-07-06 14:01:17+00:00): Als bovenstaand aangepast
syncronic (2026-07-07 19:44:40+00:00): du hast den Path mit der Hochspannungsleitung verbunden
fir99 (2026-07-07 19:57:03+00:00): Danke für die Rückmeldung; ist jetzt korrigiert.
mos_next_door (2026-07-06 15:40:39+00:00): Please avoid deleting and redrawing objects - this is not the first time you're doing it. Here -way/1535841285 - you have broken relationships and did not transfer the tags to a new roundabout. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history
themi97 (2026-07-06 17:53:32+00:00): The roundabout is new so no history exists. The bus routes I fix through Relatify and it takes some time for the changes to appear there to do the edits.
eggie (2026-07-06 13:56:37+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback .. Zo te zien heb je twee adresnodes gecombineerd. Dat lijkt me niet correct.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-07-06 14:05:16+00:00): Voorlopig even teruggedraaid 
Reverted by changeset #185200577

Wat is het adres van deze winkel?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-07-06 14:13:27+00:00): Er klopt iets niet aan de nummering
Ik heb de winkel losgemaakt en deze zit nu op nr 60A.. Dat klopt niet met de website.

Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=185198569

Waar de winkel eerst zat bevindt zich wel nr 1  volgens het Kadaster??? 

MVG
eggie
robertvh213 (2026-07-06 14:32:46+00:00): Het adres van deze supermarkt is inderdaad van Boekerenweg 1. Alleen stond de 'pin' op een ander (verkeerd) pand, namelijk de voormalige school met adres Geert Teisstraat 1A
robertvh213 (2026-07-06 14:34:36+00:00): De winkel zit daadwerkelijk onderin het pand dat op de kaart als '60 / 60A' wordt aangeduid
eggie (2026-07-06 14:36:56+00:00): Geloof je direct... Dan heeft die voormalige school geen adresmeer? 

De Spar staat nu op nr 1
eggie (2026-07-06 14:39:42+00:00): Je zou het Kadaster even kunnen vragen hoe het zit met die nummering.
Dat kan via een terugmelding via deze site
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/?searchQuery=Van+Boekerenweg+1&objectId=0037200000376848&theme=BRT+Achtergrond&geometry.x=258747.6935&geometry.y=558327.463&zoomlevel=15
eggie (2026-07-06 14:42:55+00:00): Op de school heb ik Geerts Teisstraat 1A gezet, maar volgens het Kadaster bestaat dat niet.

Groet,
eggie
robertvh213 (2026-07-06 14:45:20+00:00): Bedankt voor de hulp tot nu toe! Ik ga het verder uitzoeken. De oude school lijkt volgens Kadaster inderdaad als adres van Boekerenweg 1 te hebben, maar volgens andere bronnen zoals Google Maps is het adres Geert Teisstraat 1A (de andere straat waaraan het pand grenst). De Spar zit volgens eigen zeggen aan de Van Boekerenweg 1 maar volgens het Kadaster aan de Semsstraat.
eggie (2026-07-06 14:50:06+00:00): Nou... Leuk om uit te zoeken 😀

Je kunt beginnen met een terugmelding. Google mogen we niet als bron gebruiken.
Adressen in osm worden vanuit de BAG ..kadaster.. geïmporteerd.
Ook herimports. Daarom is het wel belangrijk dat het in de BAG correct staat.

Gr eggie
SD Mapman (2026-07-06 20:49:08+00:00): This is signed on the street blades. I know that's not how the interstate system works, and I would appreciate not having my intelligence insulted in a changeset comment.
SD Mapman (2026-07-06 20:50:11+00:00): I can get pictures for all three interstates showing the Sioux Falls standard block numbering.
SD Mapman (2026-07-06 20:54:42+00:00): Is it silly? Yes. Does it make sense? No. But Sioux Falls includes it with enough regularity that it can be mapped. They've replaced old signs too and kept the block numbers.
SD Mapman (2026-07-07 14:07:41+00:00): Sorry about being short in my response yesterday. I would be open to not including these names if you can give me good solid reasons why these streetblade names should not be included while others are.
GMoney0805 (2026-07-08 12:30:28+00:00): Thanks for apologizing, actually appreciated. Are you talking about the street blades placed at the intersections of the secondary road and the entrance/exit ramps?
SD Mapman (2026-07-08 16:04:00+00:00): Yeah, that's where I got these from. They're consistent enough (and Sioux Falls is adding new ones, Exit 2 on I-229 nb on Western) that I think they should go in the name= tag.
SD Mapman (2026-07-08 16:05:34+00:00): Note to anyone reading this, I'm not using Google as the source, just using it because they have a picture of it and I don't but I've been there in person.

https://www.google.com/maps/@43.5022905,-96.7486647,3a,15y,353.11h,96.44t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1s_dDcS-aqn6FwdSRD-fTxrw!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fcb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26pitch%3D-6.439541472263684%26panoid%3D_dDcS-aqn6FwdSRD-fTxrw%26yaw%3D353.1141307474197!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI2MDcwNS4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D
橘ヒカリ (2026-07-17 21:45:56+00:00): Reverted in changeset/185930124
jayaddison (2026-07-06 18:54:44+00:00): Thanks!
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-15 15:59:48+00:00): Cleaned up remaining SEO spam and incorrect tags in changeset 185793550, but there may not be a physically verifiable POI here given the entity type (I would have just reverted the initial changeset as SEO spam outright rather than bothering trying to translate this nonsense to sane tags).

https://osm.org/changeset/185793550
tux67 (2026-07-06 14:19:39+00:00): Hi kisaki73,
nicht ganz klar was das soll. Es gibt einen OSM Playground für "Testweise".
Ansonsten - da der Tag ja im Wiki dokumentiert ist, kannst du ihn "zu Fuß" eintragen, wenn der genutzte Editor das tag nicht kennt.
Nur mit dem Namen - das passt nicht. Ich nehme mal an das ist eine referenz auf einen "Wasser Übergabe Punkt 4.4" - dann wäre es eher ref als name.

Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185199914
rempshaener (2026-07-09 20:16:24+00:00): Hallo,
emergency=ladder_site passt hier leider nicht, das ist für Aufstellflächen gedacht und dort  - siehe "ladder" - für Hubrettungsfahrzeuge.
Für den Wasserübergabepunkt müsste etwas Neues erfunden werden.
Wozu soll der Wasserübergabepunkt denn dienen? Zur Übergabe an Faltbehälter im Pendelverkehr? Oder als Verteilstelle von HFS auf andere Einheiten? Mit oder ohne Faltbehälter?
Viele Grüße
tux67 (2026-07-10 08:02:06+00:00): Na - da lasse ich die Experten mal weiterdiskutieren .. hoffe nur das mails von OSM an kisaki73's OSM mails nicht im Spamfilter landen
rajdhani (2026-07-08 02:54:53+00:00): Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185311140 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185310962
habi (2026-07-07 08:48:06+00:00): Ciao HelenaOlivia_

Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap, schön hilfst du mit, die Kartendaten zu pflegen.

Du hast hier nach einem Review gefragt, deshalb bin ich hier: Du hast das Reisezentrum der Genfergasse an den neuen Ort am Europaplatz verschoben, die Adressdaten sind aber noch "alt" in `contact:addr`.
Zusätzlich hast du den bestehenden Namen und die verschiedenen Daten (Öffnungszeiten und Webseite) mit ";" zusammengefügt, was nicht ganz korrekt ist.
Ich habe das in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185252033 korrigiert.

E Gruess usem Liebifäud,
habi
maro21 (2026-07-12 22:12:18+00:00): Yes, shop=vacant isn't good for such case, better to use "was:" prefix :) I changed it
Alexey Vazhnov (2026-07-12 22:25:56+00:00): @maro21, thanks!
Uralla (2026-07-08 12:52:09+00:00): Откуда взято название?
confusedbuffalo (2026-07-07 19:02:48+00:00): Hi, thanks for adding these, just note that it's "terraced house" not "terrace row" for individual houses (building=house and house=terraced, not building=terrace)
SBus24 (2026-07-07 12:53:18+00:00): Hello. The edits made to these driveways were done to correct a major routing safety issue. These are strictly private driveways, not public roads or throughways. Mapping them as public routing options is causing commercial/routing traffic to erroneously use them as turnarounds and stops, creating a physical safety hazard.

If completely removing them violates mapping guidelines, please help me ensure they are correctly tagged as access=private and service=driveway so that navigation systems stop routing traffic onto this private property. Thank you."
mueschel (2026-07-26 15:31:52+00:00): Hi,
hier sind 3 Nodes mit einem seltsamen "mv" Tag, schaust du mal nach?
Tatfahren (2026-07-26 16:20:40+00:00): Das waren wohl Notizen von mir die ich vergessen hab. Ich lösche das schnell. 

Danke für den Hinweis.
Tatfahren (2026-07-26 16:29:37+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186410358
maraf24 (2026-07-10 14:20:38+00:00): Zmiany wycofane.
dzamper (2026-07-13 17:58:14+00:00): A jakie to „other maps”? Bo bez zgody/odpowiedniej licencji to kopiować nie wolno
nl-mapper (2026-07-06 15:15:07+00:00): I also have used VGIN as a source
SBus24 (2026-07-07 12:52:57+00:00): Hello. The edits made to these driveways were done to correct a major routing safety issue. These are strictly private driveways, not public roads or throughways. Mapping them as public routing options is causing commercial/routing traffic to erroneously use them as turnarounds and stops, creating a physical safety hazard.

If completely removing them violates mapping guidelines, please help me ensure they are correctly tagged as access=private and service=driveway so that navigation systems stop routing traffic onto this private property. Thank you."
marcmarti (2026-07-06 15:50:00+00:00): Hello! Many turn-restriction changesets that lyft is making in Barcelona, including this one, are redundant and unnecessary, as the ways themselves already have vehicle restrictions. Please review the changesets that you and other members of the Lyft team are making, as I've had to repeatedly correct a lot of them. This one in particular is unnecessary, as routing was working fine beforehand.
sanjanasharma_lyft (2026-07-07 06:28:41+00:00): Hi marcmarti,
My name is Sanjana, and I’m a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. Thank you for reviewing the changeset and for your feedback. I apologize for the oversight. I have corrected this in the changeset and will be more careful to review existing restrictions before making similar edits in the future.
Regards,
Sanjana
sanjanasharma_lyft (2026-07-08 06:37:28+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185264397
MarcoR (2026-07-07 12:39:43+00:00): C'erano già dei "toilets" a pochi metri: node/12067825369

Sembra che l'editor che stai usando abbia qualche problema a modificare/cancellare gli oggetti.

Buon mapping,
Marco
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-06 23:35:00+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags/values in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/185233863
GinaroZ (2026-07-17 20:16:41+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for the edits.
If you go to to the background layers in the editor you can select the Esri World Imagery which has the most up to date satellite showing the new houses.
I've tidied up this area and added the buildings etc.
Feel free to add the house numbers and any paths etc
watmildon (2026-07-06 22:19:31+00:00): Hello! 

It's helpful to other mappers if you have a changeset comment that tells what's the rough scope of changes (building additions, maxspeed and lane tagging etc). It's easy to see that this is waltham already so any more detail you can provide helps other folks keep track of things :-D

Happy mapping!
jellyfish twink (2026-07-07 12:33:37+00:00): Ah, apologies! Not gonna lie, sometimes I get really lazy with my descriptions 😅. This mainly consisted of landuse updates in Waltham & Lexington (near Waltham border), which mainly consisted of Residential land use, along with a small handful of other minor edits. Thank you for the comment :)
watmildon (2026-07-08 23:49:10+00:00): All good. There's lots to do and lots of little ways we help each other out!

If you'd like to party, a lot of US mappers are in the OSM-US Slack or the OSM World Discord.
eggie (2026-07-06 15:30:30+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
foot=no was inderdaad fout.. Overigens is foot=-yes default op fietspaden in Nederland. 

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community