piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2024-03-08 09:20:49+00:00): Hello. See my comments on another project.
This is how the final map looks after your mappings. Very sloppy mapped.
You need to improve your mapping skills before you continue with maping.
michel60 (2024-05-04 06:11:43+00:00): Bonjour,
Idem : discontinuité.
- https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=2.38833&lat=48.85364&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.94&overlays=ptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways
Cordialement Michel
Ra_colate (2024-05-21 10:38:51+00:00): Hello chacha74
Thank you for mapping!
I created a way 1269094443 (it was deleted previously) and aligned it according to Mapbox Satellite Imagery.
Please inspect your task carefully before closing.
Happy Mapping!
maraf24 (2024-03-23 21:00:07+00:00): Wycofałem. Proszę nie wporowadzać błędów z wikipedii i suikzp.
pavvv (2024-03-24 19:45:49+00:00): To, że Ligota kiedyś była w jednym miejscu nie znaczy, że jej pozycja nie może się zmienić. Wraz z utworzeniem osiedli, w tym osiedla Polanowice-Poświętne-Ligota pozycja Ligoty została zmieniona. Historyczne lokalizacje powinny trafić na OpenHistoricalMap.
maraf24 (2024-03-24 20:13:45+00:00): Nikt nie zmieniał pozycji Ligoty. Jest tam, gdzie zawsze była.
Myli ci się nowe osiedle administracyjne o nazwie "Polanowice-Poświętne-Ligota" z Ligotą.
To, że ktoś użył jakieś nazwy w konstrukcji innej nazwy nie oznacza, że jakąś operację należy wykonać na pierwszej nazwie.
W ogóle mylisz nazwy geograficzne z formalnymi osiedlami. To nie jest to samo, choć bywa, że jest.
Frans S (2024-03-05 13:06:39+00:00): Hello. See my comments on hour mapping.
PLease look here how your mappings look.
Your mappings
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=148239206
After correction and deleting worst mappings 
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=148249732
Quality prevails above quantity.
Frans S (2024-03-06 17:14:33+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148239215
Frans S (2024-03-05 12:42:47+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Inaccurate mapped.
Buildings not squared
Included yard into a mapped building.
Connected nodes of buildings to each other

Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148239265
silversurfer83 (2024-03-05 08:56:22+00:00): Danke :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148239418
SpinOff (2024-03-05 22:12:35+00:00): Hej. CPRy taguje się troszkę inaczej. Tutaj jest fajny artykuł: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Rowery#Drogi_dla_pieszych_i_rower%C3%B3w

Już poprawiłem, możesz podejrzeć
Noktoborus (2024-04-29 12:22:15+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150660921 откачено
Noktoborus (2024-04-29 13:37:26+00:00): Обратите внимание узлы перекрёcтка: Вы добавили highway=traffic_signals https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1525448799 когда на перекрёстке уже есть highway=traffc_signals и весь перекрёсток выделен отношением traffic_signals_set: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17077352
Frans S (2024-03-09 11:08:08+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Objects without shadow (above groundlevel) mapped as buildings.

Inaccurate mapped.

Nodes of buildings connected.
Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148239604
Zrop (2024-03-05 12:21:19+00:00): Hallo accoda,

warum hast Du hier jetzt noch eine 6. Agentur in diesem Gebäude eingetragen ? Wie schon in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148209735 geschrieben gibt es vor Ort nur ein Barmenia Firmenschild.

Gruß
Zrop
george1201 (2024-03-05 12:42:20+00:00): Ich habe gerade im Forum einen Thread dazu eröffnet:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/agenturstandorte-der-barmenia-versicherung/110151
Frans S (2024-03-11 17:46:06+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Inaccurate mapped.
Buildings not squared. (39 out of 69 buildings)


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148239822
Frans S (2024-03-05 13:56:30+00:00): in addition to my other comments. 
When an object shows both inside and outside a shadow, it is not a building. Often a Carroll to keep livestock, or building under construction.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148239830
Marek-M (2024-03-08 12:00:21+00:00): Cześć, napięcie linii energetycznych podajemy w Voltach. Linię 15kV prawidłowo otagowałeś z voltage=15000 ale np. dla linii https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1257742580 podałeś voltage=0,4kv zamiast voltage=400

Poza tym liczby z częścią dziesiętną rozdzielamy kropką a nie przecinkiem.
CjMalone (2024-03-05 19:55:10+00:00): Looks good to me, thank you
Frans S (2024-03-08 14:13:50+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Inaccurate mapped.
Not all buildings squared.


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148240076
alexey_zakharenkov (2024-03-05 22:08:41+00:00): Не надо удалять объекты, чтобы на этом же месте нарисовать почти такие же.

Вы подвинули здание - и три организации оказались за пределами здания.
eleonora01 (2024-03-06 07:28:17+00:00): Я не удаляла, а нарисовала дополнительные полигоны, построившейся домов. А также, да, передвинула полигон дома ближе к фундаменту зданию
alexey_zakharenkov (2024-03-06 07:59:10+00:00): Ну как это не удаляли? OSM всё помнит. Удалили и нарисовали полигоны, почти на том же месте, подвинутые на пару метров.

https://osmcha.org/changesets/148240292
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/848057189/history

И так очень часто удаляете контуры, когда можно просто подправить геометрию.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-03-05 09:10:25+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/395970963
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1257746384

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
streckenkundler (2024-03-05 20:41:14+00:00): Hei, bist du dir da sicher, daß der Stuthirtenweg Einbahnstraße ist? Mapillary zeigt was anderes: 
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=596819695200290

Demnach ist die parallele Grenzstraße Einbahnstraße (Brandenburger Seite), nicht aber der Stuthirtenweg (Berliner Seite)

Aufmerksam bin ich durch https://www.knooppuntnet.nl/en/analysis/network/10953719/facts geworden...


Danke,

Sven
berndw (2024-03-06 08:17:19+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis, sehe den Fehler, werde mein Changeset revertieren
streckenkundler (2024-03-06 08:25:52+00:00): Danke... Ich habs mir gestern abend dreimal bei Mapillary von allen Seiten angeschaut... Das ist aber auch eine seltenblöde Ecke und Situation...
berndw (2024-03-06 12:01:05+00:00): Landesgrenze halt ;-)

Die hatte ich ignoriert
Frans S (2024-03-05 13:53:08+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Inaccurate mapped sometimes.
Followed tree lines rather than rooflines.
Buildings not always squared


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148240456
Frans S (2024-03-15 17:22:30+00:00): Hello. See also my comments on other changesets about the quality of your mappings. 
Please improve your mapping skills.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148240624
Frans S (2024-03-05 13:48:28+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148240658
Frans S (2024-03-05 13:59:51+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 
When an object show not shadow, it is often not a building.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148240769
Frans S (2024-03-05 13:58:29+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148240850
Syl (2024-03-05 11:13:34+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai annulé votre modification, vous aviez ajouté un espace à la fin du nom.
Pouvez-vous corriger vos outils pour éviter ce genre d'erreur ?
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2024-03-05 11:28:00+00:00): Bonjour,
Désolé pour l'erreur, c'est corrigé
Cordialement,
L'Equipe DB
Frans S (2024-03-05 12:53:28+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Inaccurate (sloppy) mapped.
Buildings not squared.
Oversized mapped.
Nodes of buildings connected to each other>


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148240969
SEBeMob (2024-03-13 14:36:57+00:00): "access no" was set for all vehicle types.
Adjusted as described, only for bike, horse, foot
AndersAndersson (2024-03-05 16:52:45+00:00): Hej och välkommen till OpenStreetMap!
Du ritade ett hus där det redan fanns ett hus.
En sak att tänka på är att flygbilder alltid är mer eller mindre förskjutna. Man kan klicka på Bakgrundsinställningar och slå igång Trafikverkets vägnätverk och justera flygfotot utifrån det.
mcliquid (2024-03-05 10:42:37+00:00): Hi,

please note: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
d3cim (2024-03-05 11:41:15+00:00): These are legit changes because I was in these areas during this week and uploaded togheter when my internet was aviable
mcliquid (2024-03-05 10:42:22+00:00): Hi,

please note: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
d3cim (2024-03-05 11:41:47+00:00): These are legit changes because I was in these areas during this week and uploaded togheter when my internet was aviable
GilB (2024-03-12 13:51:01+00:00): 1er lot de test

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148551074
GilB (2024-03-12 13:54:29+00:00): Lot complet de changesets de "Mediatheque Diderot 1" (Médiathèque Diderot à Rezé, lieu de la cartopartie

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148551216
Ra_colate (2024-05-21 10:35:54+00:00): Hello chacha74
Thank you for mapping!
I have added connectivity in way 445959462.
Please inspect your task carefully before closing.
Happy Mapping!
Frans S (2024-03-05 13:46:23+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Sometimes inaccurate mapped.
Follow the rooflines and wall shadows more precise
Buildings not always squared


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148243783
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-11-05 08:40:54+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/998928081/history has shop = kios that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
Was it supposed to be shop=kiosk ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dkiosk ) ? Something else?
tastrax (2024-03-07 10:28:20+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
Tomaussie_17 (2024-03-07 11:28:58+00:00): Super sorry about that! I'll try make sure it doesn't happen again (third times the charm). Thank you very much for fixing!
tastrax (2024-03-07 11:52:20+00:00): No drama - I just check phone numbers regularly. For readability its also good to add the spaces in the numbers ie +61 X XXX XXX etc
ManuelB701 (2024-03-17 15:34:12+00:00): Hallo.

Deine Änderungen haben dafür gesorgt, dass viele Routen unterbrochen worden sind und repariert werden müssen.
Tatsächlich bin ich der Meinung, dass das ganze Micromapping mit den Bürgernsteigen (bzw. das strikte aufteilen in "hat Bürgersteig" und "hat keinen Bürgersteig") eher übertrieben ist und die ganzen Fragmentierungen OSM eher schadet (u.a. wegen den Routen) anstelle wirklich hilft.
jogro14 (2024-03-17 19:47:14+00:00): Du darfst gerne der Meinung sein. Falsch ist es dennoch nicht. Wenn man zusätzliche zu Geh- und Radwegen sammeln möchte (smoothness, surface, width, traffic_sign), dann ist das mit dem separaten Mapping meiner Meinung nach sinnvoller und übersichtlicher. Auf Fahrradcomputer ist ein separat gemappten Radweg auf wenigstens erkennbar im Gegensatz zu einem cycleway:side=track.

Zu den Fahrradrouten: an dieser Stelle sind alle Relationen auf die entsprechenden Wege umgelegt. Die Eine Richtung verläuft auf dem Radweg und die andere Richtung auf der Straße. Wenn ich das richtig in Erinnerung habe, dann sind die Radrouten nicht in zwei Richtungen aufgeteilt: Also eine Relation pro Richtung. Dort wo die Radrouten noch nicht aktuell sind, werde ich mir diese demnächst annehmen.

Noch eine Sache: Mittlerweile ist das Radwegenetz in Wiesbaden sogut Wie auf einem sehr aktuellem Stand. Vorher war das Kraut und Rüben. Da könnte man froh sein, wenn cycleway=lane getaggt wurde. Ob das ein Schutzstreifen oder Radfahrstreifen war, war teilweise nicht erkenntlich.

Tut mir leid, wenn zur Zeit ein paar Routen unterbrochen sind. Widme mich dem Thema demnächst.
jogro14 (2024-03-17 20:27:41+00:00): Eine Sache fällt mir gerade noch ein: In Mainz sind Hochbordradwege ebenfalls separat gemappt. Da macht es auch Gründen der Konsistenz auch Sinn dies in Wiesbaden zu machen.
ManuelB701 (2024-03-19 05:42:48+00:00): Also, nur zum Verständniss: Ich selber mag zwar das separate mappen von Bürgersteigen nicht so sehr, mein Problem aber ist das Zerstückeln von Straßen um zu mappen, wo Bürgersteige sich befinden und wo nicht (v.a. Kreuzungen).

Beispiel, hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1257774837

Wenn du DAS eine Standardpraxis ist, dann muss ich ehrlich widersprechen, denn das ist das erste mal, wo ich so etwas sehe.
Viel meher ist eher ein aufwändiges Micromapping, was einen minderen Mehrwert mit wich bringt und das verwenden von StreetComplete und Bauen von Routen einfach verkompliziert.
jogro14 (2024-03-19 20:56:27+00:00): Konkret meinst du das Tagging von cycleway/footway=crossing oder das Teilen des Straßenabschnitts vom Gehweg bis zur Kreuzung?

Hier ist ein konkretes Praxisbeispiele aus einer anderen Stadt für das Taggen von Kreuzungsbereichen von Ge- und Radwegen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/827928785
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/959902784

Dazu gibt es auch einen Wiki-Eintrag: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Crossings

Wenn du das Teilen der Straße vom Gehweg bis zur Kreuzung meinst: Damit bin ich d'accord.

Ansonsten bist du gerne am 11.05. nach Mainz zum OSM-Treffen eingeladen. Dann können wir uns auch gerne persönlich darüber austauschen. Wiesbaden scheint ja leider keine dezimierte Lokalgruppe zu haben.
ManuelB701 (2024-03-20 06:02:22+00:00): Okay, da habe ich mich verklickt und einen Eintrag darunter genommen. Ich meinte einen Unsinn wie diesen da: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1257774836

DAS ist das Micromapping, woran ich mich beschwere.
jogro14 (2024-03-20 07:17:30+00:00): Damit bin ich d'accord. Ich möchte dich aber bitten deinen Umgangston zu überdenken. Wenn du du Menschen mit ihrem "Unsinn" konfrontierst. trägt das nicht zu einer Community bei.
Szymson (2024-05-11 18:58:04+00:00): Hej, w tagowaniu tych torów jest błąd zamiast raized powinno być razed. Bez "i"
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Drazed
Xvtn (2024-03-05 15:19:16+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes. Everything looks great to me. Thanks for your contributions!
tekim (2024-03-05 17:39:55+00:00): Again, Welcome to OSM!  One issue is that in OSM we like to see buildings have square corners. In the iD editor, if you right-click on the feature a menu will appear, click on the "square" icon" and if the feature has been drawn reasonably close to being square, it will be automatically adjusted to be perfectly so.
DD1GJ (2024-03-10 08:12:46+00:00): revert, wieder gelösscht, da Weg bereits vorhanden ist: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1256938340