piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Sylabowy Kot (2025-09-20 08:10:06+00:00): Jak chcesz robić takie zmiany, to sprawdzaj historię obiektów. Rogoyski musiał wycofać zmianę, bo ktoś się o to upomniał po zeszłorocznym wniosku: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/308198116/history
NieWnen (2026-01-07 16:27:01+00:00): Czym są dokładnie power=catenary_portal? To "bramownica", czy coś innego? 

Pytam, bo nie widzę tego nigdzie udokumentowanego, a walidatory zaczęły wykrywać nietypowe wartości dla tagu power, więc pewnie warto to udokumentować/poprawić?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Apower (np. tutaj dopisać)

Szukając, trafiłem jeszcze  na dyskusję na stronie wiki man_made=gantry więc podejrzewam, że gdzieniegdzie tak mogą być otagowane.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:man_made%3Dgantry#Use_of_man_made=gantry_for_railway_signals.
Anas masuris (2026-01-07 17:46:00+00:00): power=catenary_portal to są dokładnie bramki i półbramki, na których to kotwiona jest sieć trakcyjna:

https://www.transportszynowy.pl/kolej/siectrakckolkonstrukcje

Na bramownicy montuje się na kolei semafory i tarcze lub inne rzeczy.

W wolnej chwili mogę na wiki napisać o tym artykuł
Glassman (2025-07-07 23:58:29+00:00): When tagging a closed business, I just add opening_hours=closed
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168565623
Leo Slager (2025-07-07 06:37:16+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-30 18:06:41+00:00): Hello! can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5074140 ?
NorthCrab_upload (2025-07-06 15:21:00+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Podana kombinacja addr:city + addr:place jest nieprawidłowa. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, usuń addr:place i zastosuj kombinację addr:city + addr:street. Jeśli nie, pozostaw tylko addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3655827367

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
SOSOwner (2025-07-06 16:06:10+00:00): I had actually forgotten to change the names of the X10 and X30 routes back. While mapping-out the routes, I used codes to denote if the routes were heading via different locations (BH for Broomfield Hospital, GD for Great Dunmow, GW for Great Waltham), as opposed to running directly between Stansted and Chelmsford. These have been corrected in changeset #168568254: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168568254
juminet (2025-07-07 19:32:38+00:00): Hello. 

According to the SPW PICC (official data), this street is named "Rue Échevin Georges Gillet".

There are sometimes some errors in the official data, but are you sure about your change? Can you provide your source? 

Happy mapping, 
juminet
NorthCrab_upload (2025-07-06 16:11:39+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12773372890

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Hufkratzer (2025-07-07 18:09:08+00:00): Hi,
area https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/159628079 does not look like a horse racetrack (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport=horse_racing). I think it is the area of an equestrian center (https://keio-equestrian.com/) and should be tagged as one, see
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a#Riding_centre_(equestrian)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/674075993 (example)
Mzaki (2025-07-08 00:41:35+00:00): thanks
bartgron (2025-07-06 20:21:38+00:00): Ta droga nie jest drogą przeznaczoną dla kategorii trunk według ustaleń:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Pl:Tag:highway%3Dtrunk#Zestawienie_dróg_2
(tabela na samym dole - podwyższamy tylko drogi zaznaczone na czerwono).
Zestaw zmian wycofany:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168577513
蕉饼电脑 (2025-07-06 23:16:01+00:00): Why is "layer=0" being added just for completing the challenge? It seems like node 11581915394 has nothing to do with way 1217660780.
Paul Todd (2025-07-07 08:16:30+00:00): Thanks for the feedback - I've reverted that change, and put in a fix in changeset 168592065
Supaplex030 (2025-07-06 19:41:59+00:00): Kleine Anmerkung: Bei manchen parking-Flächen fehlt noch ein "orientation" (meistens "parallel"). Benutzt du ein Preset für die Flächen? Damit fällt es evtl. leichter, keine Tags zu vergessen.

Lg, Alex
bartgron (2025-07-06 20:24:09+00:00): Obiekt nieprzeznaczony do kategorii trunk.
Zestaw zmian wycofany:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168577565
SimonPoole (2025-07-08 07:31:14+00:00): Hallo, nur zur Info: in diesem Changeset hast du die Gemeinde Grenze von Grindelwald irgendwie und sicherlich unabsichtlich kaputt gemacht. Ist in der Zwischenzeit behoben, also auch keine Aktion deinerseits erforderlich.
Langlaeufer (2025-08-12 14:21:39+00:00): ich hab auf sidewalk:both=separate korrigiert
Nadjita (2025-08-12 14:36:55+00:00): Danke!
bartgron (2025-07-06 20:25:55+00:00): Droga nieprzeznaczona do kategorii trunk. Zestaw zmian wycofany:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168577623
bartgron (2025-07-06 20:28:59+00:00): Droga nieprzeznaczona do kategorii trunk. Zestaw zmian wycofany:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168577702
bartgron (2025-07-06 20:31:59+00:00): Droga nieprzeznaczona do kategorii trunk. Zestaw zmian wycofany:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168577835
comfyquiettree (2025-08-22 19:49:00+00:00): Ahoj, jen chci upozornit, že čas se zadává specifickým způsobem (viz https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Key:opening_hours), jinak jsou pro programy nečitelné. Také si dávejte pozor na to abyste z budov nesmázával tag building, jako se stalo zde. Obě chyby jsem již opravil, takže vše je v pořádku :). Hezký den a příjemné mapování!
AwFi (2025-07-26 09:44:31+00:00): Ciao, ti scrivo di nuovo perchè ritrovo le busbay sui binari dei tram. 
Avevo iniziato a fare le modifiche per inserire le busbay nella via principale, perché secondo quanto dice la wiki la bus_bay non è un tag valido per la key "highway". In sostanza non esiste una way bus_bay ma è solo un attributo che si può dare a una way già esistente di altro tipo, primary, residential e le altre.
Normalmente su OSM si tagga come unica way una strada che non ha separazione fisica da un altra. Quindi in questo caso i binari del tram asfaltati per i tratti di strada necessari alle fermate dei bus non sono separati fisicamente da Corso Regina quindi non andrebbero mappati come vie separate.
L'idea di usare la bus_bay che avevi avuto in passato era stata ottima, ma per quello che ti dicevo è più appropriato metterla nella via centrale con poi il tag left/right/both per indicare da che lato è.

Per le prossime volte se vedi modifiche fatte di recente magari prima manda un commento al changeset o scrivi un messaggio, a me fa piacere discutere delle soluzioni.
Buon mapping!
AwFi
leobm (2025-07-17 12:07:31+00:00): what makes you think that it is 
Aria edulis ? 
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q41068995
user_5589 (2025-07-17 17:23:20+00:00): Easy. That's the correct Latin binomial for it. Sorbus aria is an outdated binomial name for Aria edulis.

https://www.treesandshrubsonline.org/articles/aria/aria-edulis/
leobm (2025-07-18 01:52:12+00:00): Mhh, ok, but then we should also adjust the Wikidata reference too?


I think there are even more trees named “Sorbus aria” (Echte Mehlbeere in German)
 near the tree. I think I copied that from another tree.
AndreaDp271 (2025-07-06 21:02:02+00:00): Ciao, hai fatto edit in 3 regioni d'italia e in Brasile; per favore, puoi salvare più frequentemente? altrimenti crei aree di changeset gigantesche come questa
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168570906
jbcharron (2026-05-09 17:19:01+00:00): Hello,
You have switched transport lines to subway instead light_rail, are you sure this network match with definition present in the osm wiki?
If it's the case, you need to also update tags on railway tracks, platforms and stop positions to respect osm transport tagging
Jean-Baptiste
BCNorwich (2025-07-07 05:21:59+00:00): Hi, Several of your new residential were mapped on top of existing residential areas in very strange shapes. A couple of other areas were dragged out of shape. I've removed the problems, and the map looks OK now.

Regards Bernard
philipcullen (2025-07-07 18:11:43+00:00): I hadn't intended to create any new residential areas - I think I've managed to trigger a bug in a JOSM plugin that's modified them when splitting buildings (it crashed a couple of times whilst editing). Thanks for putting it right.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-22 08:19:25+00:00): Cleaned up remaining SEO spam and other tagging for POI in changeset 184420300

https://osm.org/changeset/184420300
archie (2025-07-06 17:39:48+00:00): Hej, jag har reverterat det här. Du har gjort om två stora skogs-multipolygoner till vatten.
Luzandro (2025-07-11 04:58:14+00:00): Hallo,

eine Radwegpflicht wird nicht als Eigenschaft des Radwegs, sondern als mögliche Beschränkung der parallelen Straße abgebildet: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bicycle%3Duse_sidepath

das gilt genauso für optional_sidepath, was aber sowieso ein etwas fragwürdiger access value ist, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bicycle%3Doptional_sidepath

ansonsten kannst du die Unterscheidung zur Dokumentation noch mit traffic_sign angeben ("AT:52.17a-b" für benutzungspflichtigen getrennten Geh- und Radweg, "AT:53.28b" ohne Benützungspflicht)
DerKaiserschmarren (2025-07-12 17:59:09+00:00): Okay danke für den Hinweis. Ich werde es alsbald fertigstellen
Puxan (2025-07-07 16:53:50+00:00): Buildings with a diameter of 0.6 meters and made up of 377 nodes? Can you explain this to me? I've seen you've mapped a few buildings like this.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168572280
user_22482722 (2025-07-08 17:29:58+00:00): Warum wurde der Sportpark Oberhafen geändert?
ma-rt-in (2025-07-17 10:34:28+00:00): Hallo,

Was konkret fehlt Dir denn?
user_22482722 (2025-07-17 10:46:01+00:00): Fehlen tut nichts, das große Fußballfeld im Oberhafen wurde in dieser Änderung nur wieder verkleinert und mit einem Abstand zum Zaun versehen. Das ist so nicht ganz korrekt, wie man auf den ganz frischen Satellitenfotos nun auch sehen kann.
(Auf deren Grundlage hab ich das nun auch akkurat nachgezeichnet)

Wurde hier vllt versehentlich ein alter Stand wieder eingespielt?
user_22482722 (2025-07-17 17:21:51+00:00): Gegenfragen und Ignoranz sind hier wohl beliebt.
MichS (2025-07-18 04:59:07+00:00): Hallo,

kann doch sein, dass der user gerade keine Zeit hat.

MFG
ma-rt-in (2025-07-19 08:58:33+00:00): @Inanias:
Es gibt unterschiedliche Meinungen, wie groß man das Spielfeld zeichnen möchte. Ich bin der Meinung, da es nur so groß wie die Markierung gezeichnet werden sollte.
Da Du bereits selbst tätig geworden bist, müsste ich eigentlich nicht mehr hier antworten.
SOSOwner (2025-07-06 17:55:05+00:00): And the links...
https://bustimes.org/services/31-chelmsford-bus-stn-burnham-clock-tower#map
https://bustimes.org/services/331-chelmsford-bus-stn-burnham-clock-tower#map
https://bustimes.org/services/332-chelmsford-bus-stn-burnham-clock-tower#map
https://bustimes.org/services/336-chelmsford-baddow-road-danbury-bicknacre-woodh#map

I also intend to map route 333 soon...
aTarom (2025-07-06 19:40:45+00:00): Hola, gracias por editar, las elevaciones de los manholes proceden de GPS? No coinciden con el ráster del IGN
Son necesarias para algo?
Cheers
Kloof (2025-07-14 08:59:49+00:00): Hola, gracias por el apunte. Las elevaciones que añadí vienen del GPS de mi móvil, así que es posible que no sean del todo precisas en altitud. Si el ráster del IGN tiene datos más fiables, por supuesto, se pueden corregir. ¡Gracias por tu ayuda!
Puxan (2025-07-08 08:53:51+00:00): En este set de cambios has invertido el sentido de unas corrientes de agua que estaban mapeadas en el sentido correcto dejando unas corrientes de agua que suben a las montañas. Tambien has mapeado un edificio circular de unos 60 centimetros de diametro formado por 377 nodos, muchos de ellos duplicados

In this set of changes, you've reversed the direction of some previously mapped streams, leaving them running up the mountains. You've also mapped a circular building about 60 centimeters in diameter made up of 377 nodes, many of them duplicated.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168573323
Kateregga1 (2025-07-14 07:22:09+00:00): Changeset to be reverted
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168573323
Kateregga1 (2025-07-14 07:19:15+00:00): Residential Road in the middle of nowhere, not connected to any other road, changeset to be reverted
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168573447
sembelst134 (2026-01-30 16:47:22+00:00): node/12983383301 Überflur mitten auf der Kreuzung kann wahrscheinlich nicht stimmen, oder?
Matt McCutchen (2025-07-06 18:32:28+00:00): Note that I haven't rechecked the validity of any of these tags; I'm assuming their removal in https://osm.org/changeset/145780465 was unintentional.  Feel free to overwrite this changeset if you have information that is newer than when the tags were originally added prior to https://osm.org/changeset/145780465.
Senihtu (2025-07-07 14:46:41+00:00): Hi!
Ich kenne mich mit der Spurführung an dieser Kreutzung nicht aus. aber...
Mit diesem Changeset hast Du Way 137331091 zur Einbahnstraße gemacht.
Jetzt kommen die Buslinien aus der südlichen Darmstädter Ldstr nicht mehr zur Haltestelle Südbahnhof/Mörfelder Ldstr.
Das kann so nicht stimmen.
happy mapping!
Kateregga1 (2025-07-14 07:08:18+00:00): Changeset to be reverted, fixtional forests that are not visible in the satellite imagery
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168574326
フーヴァー　リー (2025-07-09 05:09:06+00:00): 方便的话可以顺便看一下道路等级，我感觉嘉善郊区道路等级都有点偏高
CurlingMan13 (2025-07-12 05:48:07+00:00): Instead of adding a new node, please just update the node that already exists.  changeset reverted.
Joseph R P (2025-07-12 16:05:31+00:00): Hello, what was the reasoning for deleting and re-mapping place nodes, such as the Goodsprings node (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12983464131)? Every object in OSM has edit history stored in it. Adding '/history' to the end of a way, node, or relation ID will show every edit that anyone has ever made to it, and a lot of these history is important, specifically for major objects like place nodes, so that old versions can be compared and edits, including those that reflect real world updates, can be better tracked. Generally, it is best practice to try to keep as much as you can. There will be many instances you need to simply delete and object and re-map it, but if something can be moved or have its tags changed, especially if it's a significant object like a place node, it's best to not delete it.
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-07-12 18:16:16+00:00): I don't recall deleting any place nodes? The Goodsprings node still exists. Sometimes, there were places nodes and boundary ways that weren't connected via a relation, so I connected them. Other times, a node existed without a boundary (like Nelson), so I created the boundary way. Other times, the boundary existed without a node (like Indian Springs), so I created the node and connected it to the way via a relation. Can you provide specif examples of me deleting place nodes? Once again, I don't remember doing any of that, just defining boundaries and adding them to relations.
Joseph R P (2025-07-13 17:51:04+00:00): Bit of a false alarm. I apologize for jumping to conclusions here—I put two and two together since you were the last one to edit the relation and I definitely recalled there being a node at some point prior to that, and you had additionally re-created the node, which lacked the original GNIS import data and is often an indication of delete-and-remap. I just did some investigating with OSMCha and found out that the label was actually merged with the Goodsprings boundary by another user back in April, and this change didn't modify the relation like your edits (or anyone else's beforehand) so it wasn't easily traceable because it only modified the old node and the current boundary. Luckily, I was able to restore the old one without having to do a complicated revert or interfering with your changes. Sorry for the mix up.
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-07-13 18:46:17+00:00): It's alright! I went ahead and re-added it to the boundary relation.
yrtimiD (2025-07-09 01:48:09+00:00): Welcome and thank you for your contribution! 

May I ask you why you deleted name:he?
yrtimiD (2025-07-09 01:51:26+00:00): I'd highly recommend to use https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Israel page as your starting guide. If you have any questions - feel free to ask local or global community in forums or telegram groups (links are in wiki page)
perenniallylate (2025-07-10 09:01:53+00:00): Hoi Mintengo, hier existiert sehr wohl ein Coop. Er hat vor einigen Wochen geöffnet. Bitte überprüfe deine Edits gründlich, insbesondere bei Löschungen. Ich habe diese Änderung revertiert:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168731830
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168575947
PcMouse1 (2025-07-06 23:39:46+00:00): Strada is now Telesat? Or is it a new company
Shrinks99 (2025-07-07 00:24:21+00:00): Telesat was moved in 2020

https://www.toronto.com/news/those-satellite-dishes-at-leslie-and-unwin-give-you-your-tv-channels/article_daafa9f1-864d-551d-b7f3-3e6903138c00.html?
NeisBot (2025-07-06 20:36:31+00:00): Hi kaennle, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Added a new restaurant node with detailed tags including address, contact information, cuisine, and opening hours."

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment #NoComment #AIgenerated
kaennle (2025-07-06 21:04:34+00:00): Added a new restaurant node with detailed tags including address, contact information, cuisine, and opening hours.
kartler175 (2025-08-04 10:05:57+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1412827684
Mit der Aufsplittung der Straße ist es nicht getan! Das Tagging der Richtungsfahrbahnen muss sich ändern (fehlende Einwegregelung, Angaben bezüglich side_walk).
Ausserden wird das Routing verkompliziert. Alles in Allem eine überflüssige Änderung.
Luzandro (2025-08-04 11:42:45+00:00): um das noch zu veranschaulichen, was da jetzt für ein Routing heraus kommt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_car&route=48.220895%2C16.325965%3B48.221546%2C16.325849

oder wenn man auf der richtigen Straßenseite bleibt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_car&route=48.220895%2C16.325965%3B48.221261%2C16.326024

wie auch schon in einem anderen CS angesprochen, ist auch hier kein separater highway=cycleway, nur weil ein Piktogramm auf der Fahrbahn ist

das CS-Kommentar "Attribut ergänzt" ist ebenfalls nicht sehr aussagekräftig und passt nicht mit den Änderungen zusammen https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168576141
Dornbacher (2025-08-05 16:55:43+00:00): ok, habe mir das vor Ort angeschaut, der Radweg (ok, die Markierung) in der Gschwandnergasse geht natürlich gegen die einbahn und das das macht schon sinn, wenn man von N kommt, umgekehrt nat. nicht.
Luzandro (2025-08-06 05:56:51+00:00): kann dir nicht ganz folgen, was ergibt von Norden kommend Sinn?
Luzandro (2025-08-08 13:43:23+00:00): Ich habe die Aufsplittung rückgängig gemacht und stattdessen für die Verkehrsinsel ein traffic_calming=island gesetzt. Ein gewisses Maß an Abstraktion haben wir sowieso und das Routing an der Kreuzung für alle möglichen Richtungen kann so mMn. sinnvoller abgebildet werden, als mit der Aufsplittung, selbst wenn man diese überarbeitet hätte

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:traffic%20calming=island?uselang=de
dadavid (2025-08-06 12:26:09+00:00): Hi Dulgor, willlkommen bei OSM, 

der Name "Private Haus" ist nicht korrekt, ich habe ihn daher entfernt. Privatgebäude bekommen idR gar keinen Namen. 
Am Cafe Grüngürtel fehlt das amenity=cafe :) 

VG

David
TriploidTree (2025-07-06 19:54:46+00:00): Bad change, phone gps was off
NeisReview (2025-07-07 06:14:49+00:00): #NameCheck

Hello and welcome to OSM.

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits, particularly those concerning the names you've added or modified.

Some of these names caught my attention as they are quite unique or a bit unusual. Could you please confirm if these additions were intentional or if they might have been added mistakenly?

Looking forward to your response.

Thank you!
NeisReview (2025-07-07 06:15:31+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168576865
TriploidTree (2025-07-07 07:04:08+00:00): Hello, the pub change I think I reverted, the gps told me I was sitting elsewhere.

The restaurant I was definitely sitting in and the food was delicious. It was a busy Korean restaurant
NeisReview (2025-07-07 07:45:39+00:00): Hi, danke für die Antwort. Passt.
Viele Grüße
AndreaDp271 (2025-07-06 20:20:02+00:00): congratulations for making such a big changeset area, you took half the world. Please save your changes more frequently so as not to ruin the spirit of osm
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168576603
bxl-forever (2025-07-06 21:03:31+00:00): ⚠️ It looks like this changeset re-used several existing relations all over the world to transform them into relations for roads in Colorado.

Take this one, which was a multipolygon in London (UK) up to version #5: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/332/history

Or this one was a river in Iraq up to version #11: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/147/history
AndreaDp271 (2025-07-06 21:07:11+00:00): Very strange, I hope it is not necessary to contact the Data Working Group
limes11 (2025-07-06 21:46:44+00:00): Not sure how this happened, but he used relations with increasing id's 1, 2, 3 etc. I mean...how often do you touch the first relation ever created :)

Might be a wrong-sign error as the api expects temporary negative id's for new objects.

Anyways this needs a full revert.
bxl-forever (2025-07-06 21:58:17+00:00): I reverted the changeset here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168579807

All the relations elsewhere in the world were restored to their previous state.

@Flap Slimy Outward: your work to create road relations in your area was preserved too, in most cases through new relations.

The comment by @limes11 is correct.

To create new objects in OSM, you should give them *negative* numbers and the API will create them for you.  On the contrary, if you use *positive* numbers, you will ask the API to re-use an existing object having that number.  That created the mess here, because your upload requested to edit several relations that were already in use and move them to Colorado.