piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Violaine_Do (2025-05-28 22:14:51+00:00): Hi @Aleksandar Matejevic, 
Thanks for pointing this out. 

Yes there is a lot of weird things in the administrative boundaries mapping... 

For the official part : 
There has been different decrets (https://dev2lexpol.cloud.pf/LexpolAfficheTexte.php?texte=176935 and https://dev2lexpol.cloud.pf/LexpolAfficheTexte.php?texte=216633) about the creation of commune in French Polynesia. The subdivision (level 6) are to be a composition of admin 8 (commune) (see decret https://dev2lexpol.cloud.pf/LexpolAfficheTexte.php?texte=177598).  Commune have competences over the lagoon but it is not taken into account into the commune limites (it is confusing i think).
The official boundaries fit on the land as for now, and is shared on the local opendata sharing platform by the government and can be found here https://www.tefenua.data.gov.pf/datasets/3e956e20eec344bfb147682a38d7383e_0/  

Wiki page about administrative boundaries mapping : 
General OSM Community : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:boundary%3Dadministrative The local page wich is a bit more specific https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:French_Polynesia/FR:French_Polynesia_tagging_guidelines#Limites_administratives 

Hope this helps, 
I will try to clean this,
Best regards,
Violaine
MassCartog (2025-06-11 13:54:45+00:00): Hello in this change set you have removing a lot of valid ways leading into parking lots. Was this a mistake?
Vinber (2025-05-29 10:48:57+00:00): Bonjour,
je ne comprends pas ce que signifie le commentaire ? cela créé de fausses alertes dans quel logiciel ? 

à plus
GEOCAL NC (2025-05-29 21:24:50+00:00): Bonjour, oui la zone à 90 ou 70 démarrait un peu plus loin. On est une société de géolocalisation sur la Nouvelle Calédonie, et on se sert du referencement OSM pour les remontées vitesses. Un client pointilleux m'a fait décaler de quelques metre la fin de zone à 90. Bonne journée !
dpolovinkin (2025-05-28 21:38:28+00:00): снова здравствуйте, повторю то что писал в комментарии в https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154074924, можете плиз писать что именно было изменено, что угодно по делу, "детализация местности" это по факту 0 инфы, спасибо!
FUZZY_42 (2025-05-29 00:26:15+00:00): В пакете правок есть вся информация о внесённых изменений.
dpolovinkin (2025-05-29 07:52:20+00:00): оно никакой нормальной инфы не дает, там могут быть сотни измененных объектов без инфы от вас что вы делали и почему, прочитайте статью в вики что я кидал

реально говорю, так нельзя, что тут спорить то, люди игнорируя это правило блоки получают
Fizzie-DWG (2025-06-14 05:02:45+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed doubtful import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167598951
rskedgell (2025-05-28 10:21:03+00:00): If it's private, you probably want access=private rather than access=no
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access#List_of_possible_values
HirschKauz (2025-05-28 14:54:27+00:00): Hi! 
Ist dies ein lokaler Shop den man besuchen kann? Laut webseite ist es ein online-shop. In dem Fall wäre statt shop=* eher office=* zu nutzen.
Grüße
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166852949
Fizzie-DWG (2025-06-14 05:18:59+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed doubtful import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167599186
dcapillae (2025-05-28 09:37:29+00:00): Gracias.

Error mío, lo siento. Tenía un filtro activo en JOSM y no me di cuenta que lo estaba duplicando.
bartgron (2025-05-28 20:08:39+00:00): Jeśli droga jest widoczna w terenie, powinna zostać naniesiona na mapie. Jeśli jest to teren prywatny, można dodać do drogi tag access=private który oznacza drogę prywatną. Zmianę wycofam i dodam do tej drogi tag access private
bartgron (2025-05-28 20:12:11+00:00): Oprócz tego jest to droga highway=track (droga polna lub leśna) którą większość nawigacji i tak by nie poprowadziła
NeisBot (2025-05-28 05:57:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description
NeisReview (2025-05-29 09:35:49+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/166911110
NeisBot (2025-05-28 06:21:47+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-05-29 09:37:16+00:00): 👎 Already (partly) reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/166861922
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-06-08 09:38:54+00:00): St. Albert Trail being forced into the parking lot seems unlikely.
removed
anautiyal_lyft (2025-08-06 11:08:15+00:00): Hi, Spaghetti Monster!
My name is Abhishek and I'm a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft.
I apologize for my mistake. I sincerely regret the incorrect edits and for my delayed response to your comment. Thank you very much for promptly removing the turn restriction.
Best regards, Abhishek
flohoff (2025-06-27 07:55:33+00:00): Moin,
ich habe hier die Changesets gesehen.

Cool das du mit mappst.

Also - Mit dem Gebäude Referenz im "name" - Dafür ist bei OSM der "name" nicht da - Das Name tag ist nur für wirkliche Eigennamen - Also sowas wie "Konrad-Adenauer-Halle" - Für Gebäudereferenzen wird das "ref" tag verwendet.

Ich baue hier mal ein bisschen um ...

Flo
flohoff (2025-06-27 07:59:32+00:00): So - ich hab noch einen - Die Gebäude in Gütersloh sind zu 99% aus dem Liegenschaftskataster übernommen. Gerade in Gütersloh dürfen wir sowohl die Geometrieen des Landes NRW, wie auch die des Kreis Gütersloh verwenden.

Du hast jetzt hier teile nach Luftbildern "korrigiert". Auch im ID Editor kann man sich das ALKIS dahinter einblenden (Ich nehme den selber nicht) - Aber hier mal eine Stelle als Screenshot aus dem JOSM - Da siehst du den Lagefehler der aus dem Luftbild übernommenen Gebäude:

https://tmp.zz.de/20250627-BarometerPlaything/Screenshot_from_2025-06-27_09-57-34.png
flohoff (2025-06-27 08:01:45+00:00): Und noch einen :) Weil ich gerade so durchsehe - Die Verbungsgänge zwischen den Gebäuden hast du nicht mit "building" sondern mit man_made=bridge getagged. Das ist eher nicht richtig - man_made=bridge sind für Verkehrsinfrastruktur Brücken mit Wiederlagern. Das hier ist definitiv bestandteil von Gebäuden. 

Ich wollte gerade einiges an Gebäuden aus dem ALKIS Korrigieren - dabei ist mir aufgefallen das die ALKIS Gebäudeunterteilung nicht den Gebäudereferenzen entspricht.

Das würde man mit "building:part" lösen. D.h. das Gesamtgebäude und dann darüberliegend einzelne "building:part" die dann die refs haben. 

Ich gucke mal.
flohoff (2025-06-27 08:08:38+00:00): Ach ja - ich bin drauf gekommen weil es eine Differenzkarte zwischen ALKIS und OSM gibt die ich gebaut habe - Da sieht das dann so aus:

https://tmp.zz.de/20250627-ConsonantClinic/Screenshot_from_2025-06-27_10-06-06.png

Da leuchtet gerade alles.

Flo
gscscnd (2025-05-28 15:41:47+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166882055
nevw (2025-05-28 07:58:40+00:00): Hi, you need to place the business at the office you operate from instead of out in a vacant paddock. Also include the addr:housenumber on Forestdale Road.
tastrax (2025-05-28 08:42:37+00:00): Your ABN number suggests you are at 42 Showgrounds Road, Castle Hill - but where is the actual location of the business?
fortera_au (2025-05-28 23:04:45+00:00): Also, a link to Google Drive likely isn't going to work for an image, you're best to link to an image on your website.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166857281
nevw (2025-06-04 00:29:00+00:00): I have reverted this changeset that has not provided a correct physical location for their business.
Gregory Peony (2025-07-12 18:08:43+00:00): The footprints you're adding are valid, appropriately squared, and fairly accurate, though sometimes slightly oversized. You mapped with bing imagery which is older at time of mapping and so the footprints do not align with ESRI. I recomment offsetting imagery before mapping. You can read about how to do this in my project comments.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166857442
Gregory Peony (2025-07-12 16:10:14+00:00): These footpritns are valid and you distinguished between round and square buildings well but they could be more accurate. Take care to make contributions that others can build upon. please remember to square (q) your footprints. The southern most footprint should be extended southward; it is partially covered by a tree but its full extent can be determined using bing.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166857505
NeisBot (2025-05-28 07:36:43+00:00): Hello, thank you for your contribution.

Your changeset was commented because it appears to follow a pattern that could be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related.

Could you kindly confirm if your map edits were intentional?

#MapWithoutSpam #Name #Comment
NeisReview (2025-05-29 15:44:19+00:00): 👎 Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/166926563
Gregory Peony (2025-07-26 01:27:51+00:00): The northern footprint represents a building in the imagery the southern one does not; I deleted it.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166857535
Gregory Peony (2025-07-12 16:12:20+00:00): A valid and appropriately shaped footprint. If it were a little smaller it'd be excellent. Keep in mind that pitched roofs tend to overhang building walls somewhat. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166857599
RSydes (2025-05-28 07:38:53+00:00): Ignore the given source tag (source=aerial).  That was autofilled from a previous edit, and I forgot to change it.
RSydes (2025-05-28 07:38:21+00:00): Ignore the given source tag (source=aerial).  That was autofilled from a previous edit, and I forgot to change it.
Gregory Peony (2025-07-11 23:50:27+00:00): The geometry of the footpritns you mapped here is generally good, though could be a more accurate at times. Check Changeset: 168817115 to see how I mapped some of these features. Keep in mind that pitched roofs tend to overhang the walls of buildings and some include the building's shadow in the footprint. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166858121
Gregory Peony (2025-07-11 22:42:31+00:00): These footprints are both valid and quite accurate. The northern one is very well mapped.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166858219
impiaaa (2025-05-29 15:47:01+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for your contribution! Does this field actually have a formal name of "FMS soccer"? If so, the abbreviation should be expanded and the title capitalized, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Good_practice . If it's just a soccer field that's maintained by the middle school, you can add the name of the school in the operator= tag on the field.
Y P K (2025-05-29 15:49:44+00:00): Thanks, I will update it.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-05-28 07:50:59+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/641529605

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Gregory Peony (2025-07-12 01:13:13+00:00): some of these footprints are well mapped when looking at bing which was used to map them. I recommend aligningit to ESRI so that features are properly aligned. See my project comment.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166858331
Gregory Peony (2025-07-11 23:52:35+00:00): I do not believe the features I tagged represent buildings visible in imagery but rather yards or parts of them.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166858558
Gregory Peony (2025-07-14 23:12:49+00:00): The footprints you added represent buildings in the imagery but could be more accurate. Landuse and footpritns should not share nodes.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166858635
Gregory Peony (2025-07-26 00:16:04+00:00): Hi the fooprints you added here do not represent buildings in the imagery; I deleted them. After mapping buildings, please remember to square their corners. Most buildings have square corners because that's easy to build. Unless the building is clearly a different shape then it's best to assume that the corners should be squared. In the iD Editor, use the `Q` key to square the corners. This [video about squaring features](https://youtu.be/Xs5wX592E1o) has more information and a guide.
Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166858676
Gregory Peony (2025-07-11 20:57:52+00:00): Looks like you improved these footprints by squaring them but they share nodes with other features. Please watch the missing maps beginer mistakes videos for demos on how to resolve such issues.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166858686
angys (2025-05-28 09:52:04+00:00): Kepada pengguna petajalanterbuka,

Terima kasih atas sumbangan anda dalam mengemaskini data OpenStreetMap.

Saya ingin mencadangkan agar nama asal "Jalan Jinjang Indah 9" dalam Bahasa Inggeris tidak dipadamkan sepenuhnya daripada data. Sebaliknya, adalah lebih sesuai sekiranya nama tersebut disimpan di dalam tag old_name=* sebagai rujukan sejarah dan kemudahan pengguna lain.

Untuk makluman, berdasarkan laporan oleh DBKL sekitar tahun 2007-2008, memang terdapat penukaran rasmi nama-nama jalan di kawasan Jinjang kepada versi Bahasa Malaysia, seperti yang direkodkan dalam sumber berikut:
https://aarvidi.wordpress.com/2008/02/11/87-roads-in-jinjang-get-new-names-to-dignify-bahasa-malaysia/

https://b.cari.com.my/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=103786&page=5

Walau bagaimanapun, realitinya adalah ramai penduduk tempatan, serta dokumen rasmi seperti kad pengenalan, bil utiliti dan surat-menyurat, masih menggunakan nama lama. Oleh itu, penyimpanan nama asal sebagai old_name=* akan membantu mengekalkan rujukan yang relevan, sekali gus memudahkan pengguna yang mencari lokasi berdasarkan nama lama.

Sekian, terima kasih atas perhatian dan kerjasama anda.

Yang benar,
angys
angys (2025-05-28 09:53:22+00:00): Kepada pengguna petajalanterbuka,

Terima kasih atas sumbangan anda dalam mengemaskini data OpenStreetMap.

Saya ingin mencadangkan agar nama asal "Jalan Jinjang Permai 9" dalam Bahasa Inggeris tidak dipadamkan sepenuhnya daripada data. Sebaliknya, adalah lebih sesuai sekiranya nama tersebut disimpan di dalam tag old_name=* sebagai rujukan sejarah dan kemudahan pengguna lain.

Untuk makluman, berdasarkan laporan oleh DBKL sekitar tahun 2007-2008, memang terdapat penukaran rasmi nama-nama jalan di kawasan Jinjang kepada versi Bahasa Malaysia, seperti yang direkodkan dalam sumber berikut:
https://aarvidi.wordpress.com/2008/02/11/87-roads-in-jinjang-get-new-names-to-dignify-bahasa-malaysia/

https://b.cari.com.my/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=103786&page=5

Walau bagaimanapun, realitinya adalah ramai penduduk tempatan, serta dokumen rasmi seperti kad pengenalan, bil utiliti dan surat-menyurat, masih menggunakan nama lama. Oleh itu, penyimpanan nama asal sebagai old_name=* akan membantu mengekalkan rujukan yang relevan, sekali gus memudahkan pengguna yang mencari lokasi berdasarkan nama lama.

Sekian, terima kasih atas perhatian dan kerjasama anda.

Yang benar,
angys
petajalanterbuka (2025-05-30 14:47:10+00:00): Maaf atas kekhilafan saya 🙏. Saya patut research lagi mendalam tentang penggunaan nama jalan ini sebelum dibuang. Saya dah revert changeset ni
Gregory Peony (2025-07-26 00:21:14+00:00): Hi almost all the footprints you mapped here represent buildings in the imagery. One in the south does not. You also added overlapping footprints due to the fact that the footprints you mapped are generally slightly oversized. When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom in so that you can see the outline of the building and mark the corners carefully. Exclude shadows and yards when tracing the footprint.  Keep in mind that you are looking at the roofs of buildings, but mapping their footprints. Depending on how the scene is lit, pitched roofs may have light and dark sections that belong to one building. Generally pitched roofs overhang the walls of a building, so a footprint slightly smaller than the roof is accurate. You can scale selected features in ID with shift+(-/+), or JOSM with ctrl.+alt+Lclick & drag.  Take care to make contributions that others can build upon.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166859015
Gregory Peony (2025-07-11 22:46:35+00:00): Footprints quite well mapped but could be more accurate. Please read my project comment to see how to modify features after tagging and squaring them. Thanks for your contribution.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166859058
NorthCrab_upload (2025-05-28 08:00:52+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/641529334

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Gregory Peony (2025-07-13 01:17:07+00:00): You are identifying buildings in the imagery but the footprints you mapped are generally oversized. Take care to not include the shadow in the footprint. I think this oversizing contributed to the mapping of shared nodes and overlapping  between footprints. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166859199
Gregory Peony (2025-07-11 22:49:25+00:00): These footprints are valid but inaccurate. Take care to not include the shadow of a building in its footprint as that makes it oversized. The footprint you deleted is also valid.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166859212
Gregory Peony (2025-07-12 02:38:42+00:00): Welcome  to OSM! The vast majority of footprints you mapped here represent buildings in the imagery. The imagery allows for these footprints to be more accurate. Please map individual buildings without collecting multiple nearby buildings into a single object. Zoom in so that you can see the outline of the roofs and look for the gaps between the buildings or different roof colors to help determine where one building ends and another begins.

When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Zoom in so that you can see the outline of the building and mark the corners carefully. Don't include the building's shadow.

Please do not snap the corners of the buildings to other buildings or features such as roads and paths. In the iD Editor, hold down the `Alt` key to keep nodes from snapping to other objects and accidentally connecting. This [video about connected nodes](https://youtu.be/ltn1VOiq5_0) has more information and a guide.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166859427
Gregory Peony (2025-07-12 02:39:15+00:00): You correctly modified the highway to avoid data overlap.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166859427
Gregory Peony (2025-07-12 02:43:17+00:00): I flagged some accurate and valid footprints. PLease map more like that in future. Thank you for yout contribution.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166859427
Gregory Peony (2025-07-12 02:41:47+00:00): appropriate highway modificaion. I flagged footpritns that envelope multiple buildings. The L shaped building in the East is quite accurate.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166859558
Gregory Peony (2025-07-12 01:10:25+00:00): The footprints I flagged are oversized and sometimes envelope multiple buildings. Map footprints slightly smaller than the roof since it likely overhangs the walls somewhat.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166859574
Gregory Peony (2025-07-11 22:20:32+00:00): I flagged some footprints where you mapped only one side/part of the roof. Bear in mind that you are looking from above so you will see roofs. Depending on the orientation of the building and its roofshape it may have light and dark areas. Identify from where the scene is lit before mapping to use light and shadow to aid your interpretation. In ESRI the shadows are cast NW. Please include the project hashtags like hotosm-project-xxxxx as this helps track the contributions made to the project.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166859603
Gregory Peony (2025-07-11 22:25:58+00:00): You correctly identified buildings in imagery but generally mapped them oversized. See my project comment. Please do not add layer tags to 'resolve' overlapping features issues caused by inaccurate geometry.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166859691