piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
josail (2023-06-26 07:50:44+00:00): Thank you very much for your effort to sort this out. My first visual inspection tells, that all seegrass preexisting (included before this reverted changeset #137667141) is visible again. I will have a closer look tonight. Likely, everything is fine now. As soon as I get a positive feedback from the Greek Seagrass Meadows authors, I will closely follow the guidelines you have mentioned to make all steps necessary for including this valuable open access data on seagrass.  I learned a lot and was before not aware of these import procedures and guidelines. They make a lot of sense to me, including the use of a dedicated user name for the import only. 

Thanks a lot again for your effot and sorry for the confusion and work related to sorting this out. 

Jo
SomeoneElse (2023-06-26 08:22:53+00:00): Thanks - one more question.  Clearly OSM failed to make it clear that there even were import guidelines, despite you contributing to the project off and on for a year or so.  What bits of documentation were you aware of, and what would have helped avoid this problem in the first place?
josail (2023-06-26 21:04:15+00:00): Thanks also for this question.

I thought carefully on it this afternoon.  I know parts o the wiki quite well, especially the taging schemes, have used it continuously as reference before I used new keys and even have amended parts of the wiki on the seamark tagging scheme. But in this case, if you don't know the existance of the import guideline, you would hardly start searching it in the wiki.

I have also gained quite some experience with OSM work in JOSM, applied the presets carefully and always checked carfully the validation results before uploading. Also in this case of the large seagrass import I made much effort to check, address and solve all validation errors and 95% of the warnings. 

From my perspective I can name two things, that would certainly have stopped me importing a very large set of already very carefully and well JOSM validated data:

1. A dedicated upload warning window or explicit well described validation warning for the large amount of data in the upload. Such warning should best include a direct link to the required (for me unknown) import guidelines and any other procedures to be checked in the wiki. There the requirement to open a website, ask for community review, use a special user name, etc. would have popped up. I know some other cases, where warning windows in JOSM included a link to further explanation in a special wiki website.

2.  A warning or error messeage during the upload procedure requesting  in the upload description for the large amount of data to include as a value the reference to the import plan website. Again this request to provide something, that I did not know of, would have started me to think twice and search for it in the wiki.

The question is: Does OSM experience tell a reasonable size of an upload, above one can most likely assume, that the import guideline should be applied. Then a combination of both would work best: 
1. a JOSM validation error or validation warning with a link to the 'import Guideline' (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines) and a request to use a seperate username for such large upload and 
2. the requirement in the JOSM upload to link the created wiki page outlining the details of the import plan (Step 3.2 in the guideline), e.g. next to and in addition to the source information. 

I hope this idea is helpful and that this laboursome experience can perhaps add some value for the future of OSM.
josail (2023-06-26 21:27:26+00:00): Apart from the general question above: 
I visually checked the undone reverts and current display of seagrass in OSM (26.6.2023 18 hrs UTC). So far I found only one instance, where an older version of an anchoring area (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/588629274) now incorrectly overlaps the protected seagrass (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1003725381). I will leave few days distance to the revert and undo process and then correct this way 588629274 manually. 

Great how you managed to undo the revert for the seagrass, which existed in OSM before this changeset. The initial visibility of the  seagrass in OSM illustrates the purpose of the seagrass tagging and will lay ground for future careful work in OSM on seagrass and the nature of the seabed. Thanks to SomeoneElse again. Jo
rskedgell (2023-06-23 15:34:37+00:00): I am not convinced that the landuse=orchard was an error in need of correction to natural=wood here. I'm pretty sure @ramthelinefeed knew what they were tagging after surveying it on the ground.
sirorezka (2023-06-23 23:29:07+00:00): Hi, are you sure? I know that there was several plants planted by orchad project, but there is basically 4 apple trees planted, is this the correct definition of an orchard? There are wild apple trees in kennington park, wild cherry in Vauxhall park, but none of them mappe as an orchads.
sirorezka (2023-06-23 23:34:01+00:00): I live nearby, thus quite sure that visually you will never tell that there is smth that might be defined as "trees planted for food production". Photo of the or area can be found here on the page 7:
https://www.vauxhallandkennington.org.uk/library/Vauxhall-Park-guided_tour.pdf
sirorezka (2023-06-27 22:54:21+00:00): Updated area based on our discussion.
Benoît C MdP (2023-06-26 08:14:07+00:00): Bonjour Melrok

J'ai supprimé ce point car il était déjà présent sous la forme d'un polygone donc ça faisait un doublon. Pour rappel, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Taguer_pour_le_rendu 

Bonne continuation

Benoît
Melrok (2023-06-27 12:38:41+00:00): Bonjour,
Merci pour le retour!

J'avais mis le point car le nom du polygone ne s'affiche pas sur le bâtiment. Que faire dans ce cas?

D'ailleurs y a-t-il un forum discutant de ce genre de choses ou est-ce commun de discuter comme je le fais ici ?
Benoît C MdP (2023-06-27 12:46:09+00:00): Oui, tu as le forum en français pour échanger. https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/  Pour que les écoles de musique s'affichent, il faut :
- soit que tu trouves un rendu qui prend en compte ce type d'élément
- soit que tu suggères au rendu principal https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Mapnik que ces POI soient pris en compte

Bonne continuation

Benoît
user_17222985 (2023-09-07 08:00:05+00:00): границу с кацапией 
лучше всего редактировать по украи нскому кадастру в котором  отображены все договора  
после войны границу Украны с кацапией переделаю по кадастру ето будет наиболее точно и правильно
Mazda05 (2023-09-07 22:44:53+00:00): Кадастр не является первоисточником и может содержать неточности и ошибки. Первоисточник границы — договор о госгранице и только, так как демаркации и последующих договоров об изменении госграницы, в связи с демаркацией или уточнениями, на сегодня нет. Если у вас есть оригинальные данные из международного договора, а именно приложения 1 и 2 — прошу предоставить, скорректирую в соответствии с ними. Либо можете скорректировать самостоятельно, если таковые данные у вас имеются
dannmer (2024-05-21 12:22:25+00:00): There's a note that has been added recently stating that the feature called "Something Switch" is "Roosevelt Switchpoint". Do you have any idea if this suggestion is correct?
archpdx (2023-06-23 02:38:16+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for adding these gas stations. In the future, however, please do use more meaningful changeset comments: "Changed some things." does not help other mappers understand what you're doing. In this case, "Added gas stations" would've been sufficient.
user_11609320 (2023-06-23 02:31:08+00:00): rest area has been closed for over 20 years. it is used as a maintenance yard for caltrans
Cebderby (2023-06-23 10:58:16+00:00): Hi, just to let you know I've dropped the access=permissive you set on these 2 gates. What was set before was 'correct' but confusing: access=no was set to stop all modes of transport with foot=designated set to override that for foot.  But access=permissive says that all modes of transport can use the gate unless the landowner wants to close it, which is wrong on both parts for a public footpath.  In the end, the gates can only be accessed via the appropriately tagged public footpath so it's not doing anything, I've left it as foot=designated alone.
Polarbear (2023-10-03 13:26:30+00:00): Hallo MappiViewer,
woraus ergibt sich die Nutzungseinschränkung für die Spielplätze? (permissive)
Was ist die Quelle dafür?
user_18208051 (2023-10-03 13:51:26+00:00): This is private land (operator private) and not publicly owned, only freely accessible ("Bis auf Widerruf").
Polarbear (2023-10-03 15:13:55+00:00): Habe mir grade die Mapillary-Bilder angesehen und kann keine Beschilderung diesbezüglich erkennen?
Polarbear (2023-10-03 15:38:06+00:00): Na wenn es frei zugänglich ist, ohne dass man jemand um Erlaubnis fragen muss, ist es doch nicht 'permissive'.
Die Eigentumsverhältnisse interessieren in dem Zusammenhang nicht.
felipeeugenio (2024-03-28 14:00:29+00:00): Hola. El nombre estaba mal o el nombre cambió?
Si acaso cambió hay que dejar el antiguo como old_name=

saludos
DressyPear4 (2023-06-23 05:23:02+00:00): Olá, adicione informações corretas nas tags
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137670114
silversurfer83 (2023-06-23 07:29:29+00:00): Moin Tigges :)

Da es bisher noch niemand sagte: Herzlich willkommen bei OSM

ich hätte ein paar Fragen / Anmerkungen / Bitten:

- du hast hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/757674949 einen Straßenabschnitt gelöscht. War das Absicht? Falls ja: Der Abschnitt ist auf den relevanten Luftbildern noch zu sehen. Da ist löschen keine gute Lösung. Dann eher als "removed:highway=$wert" kennzeichnen. Siehe auch hier: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix
Falls es keine Absicht war, bitte den Abschnitt wieder einzeichnen. Danke.

- Da ich nach dem gelöschten Weg frage hier meine erste Anmerkung: Du hast leider keine Quelle für deine Änderung angegeben. Das macht es sehr schlecht nachvollziehbar, warum du hier etwas geändert hast. Außerdem ist ein "." als Änderungskommentar untauglich. Hier gibt es ausführliche Informationen zu Änderungskommentaren und warum sie wichtig sind: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

- die B 66n scheint aktuell noch nicht ganz korrekt kategorisiert zu sein. Teilweise sieht es so aus, als wären die Abstufungen verstauscht, auch mit dem Zubringer (Lemgoer). Bitte einmal mit diesem Artikel vergleichen und ggf. "scondary", "primary" etc. überarbeiten: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:highway

Bei Fragen immer raus damit. Viele Aktive sind in den Chatgruppen in den Weiten des Internet zu finden:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contact_channels#Chats.2Fmessengers

Weiter viel Spaß
silversurfer83
derTigges (2023-06-23 11:14:23+00:00): Moin, 
Das war so schon Absicht, weil ich für eine änderung keine Möglichkeit gesehen habe, das ganze anzupassen.
Änderungsquelle sind eigene Erfahrungen, da das mein Arbeitsweg ist und jetzt wurde der Teil der Umgehung eben freigegeben, was ich direkt aktualisieren wollte. Und die Luftbilder sind einfach noch nicht aktuell genug.
. Schreibe ich rein, weil ich nie verstanden habe, was ich da richtig rein schreiben soll, aber werde ich in Zukunft anders machen.
silversurfer83 (2023-06-23 12:12:36+00:00): Hi
Danke für die schnelle Rückmeldung.
Der gelöschte Abschnitt: ist dort noch Asphalt auf dem Boden aber nicht mehr für den Verkehr genutzt oder ist der Abschnitt abgerissen und wirklich "weg"?
Sorry für die fragerei, es macht halt für die Eintragung einen Unterschied 

Grüße 
Silversurfer83
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-07-17 11:14:53+00:00): Thanks for updating this! Torn down building are quite tricky :)
Langlaeufer (2023-06-23 06:44:46+00:00): Hallo Andre, 
die Bilder von Bing sind im Harz nicht sonderlich gut entzerrt. Als Vorlage zum Verbessern der Geometrie nicht unbedingt geeignet. Hier lieber die Bilder von ESRI und Mapbox verwenden (das sind die amtlichen Luftbilder der Landesvermessung)
Andre68 (2023-06-23 15:42:53+00:00): Hallo Langlaeufer,
danke für den Hinweis!
Ich habe jetzt die Wege auf Basis von ESRI wieder etwas anders positioniert. Sollte dann hoffentlich passen. Bin morgen vor Ort und kann es kurz prüfen... Wenn auch der GPS-Empfang mit dem Handy eh eher ungenau ist...
zstadler (2023-11-25 15:24:00+00:00): שלום יניב,

תודה על תרומתך לעדכון המפה!

בעריכה זותייגת בסימון שחור את מה שהיה מעקף זמני של שביל מגידו.

האם זה צבע של סימון השביל בשטח, בדומה לסימוני השבילים של החברה להגנת הטבע?
אולי זה צבע סימון שבילים של הקק"ל?

אשמח אם תוכל להבהיר את הנקודה.

בברכה,
זאב
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137672001
gscscnd (2023-06-23 08:45:59+00:00): Żeby była użyteczna w rutingu, trzeba ją podłączyć do:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/70521166

motor_vehicle=no powoduje, że nie można „dojechać samochodem terenowym”. Zobacz:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
tux67 (2023-06-23 13:18:27+00:00): Hallo geozeisig,

ist das hier ein irgendwo koordinierter "automated edit"? 
Ich vermisse eine Referenz wo die Abstimmung dazu stattgefunden hat.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct

Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137672845
Warin61 (2023-06-24 00:10:06+00:00): Errr ...

1) multipolygon relations cannot share outer way segments. 
See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=151.22194&lat=-33.87452&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

2 the building tag should have only one value. So building=yes;hotel is wrong.

3 The hotel covers more that what you have mapped. It would be best mapped using building:part tagging.
OddBunsen (2023-06-24 02:40:05+00:00): When you're making an area, be sure to not connect it to ways like roads or paths. The way should be in the middle of the road or path, and the area should come up to the road or path.
OddBunsen (2023-06-24 02:40:45+00:00): *the area should come up to the edge of the road or path
user_18305684 (2023-06-24 23:13:46+00:00): Hi,

what is Balanbal Omane ? You add a tag vikkage but on imagery there is no visible building. Is the node at the good coordonates ?

Best regards
Lababulscio (2023-06-25 11:21:08+00:00): @Krako73, thank you for asking a very good question.

So Balanbal Oomane like many of the smaller settlements are really part of what could be termed the "Balanbale-Fadhigaradle metro." Balanbale in the Galgaduud Region of Somalia to Fadhigaradle west in the district of Shilabo (Shilaabo/Shilavo) are two perimeter points of the same people (belonging to very close knit sub-clan of the Marehan people who in that landscape with Caabudwaaq (Abudwaq) as principal center. So in that particular "Balanbale-Fadhigaradle metro" a large section of the population are "nomadic pastoralists" meaning they move with their flock (camels, goats, sheep) for grazing, feed, and water. Obviously they were driven to that livelihood because of their environment. What happens is where they are in one season (Gu or long rainy season, Hagaa or short dry season, followed by Deyr or short rainy season, ending in Jiilaal or long dry season), they are most likely moving to another post in the next season so range and feed can "recover" that why the next migration they come back there is grazing. This is how they naturally manage and conserve resources. BALANBAL OOMANE IS A SEASONAL "BALI" (SOMALI FOR WATERHOLE/LAKE, ETC). 1/2 of the year the waterhole is likely to be a small "seasonal" lake (during the Gu and Deyr rains) and which transitions into a big boisterous village also called by the seasonal lake's name of "Balanbal Oomane." So your question is a very good question given the complexity of lifestyle and environment and settlement pattern that is exhibited in much of this area because of the NOMADIC LIVELIHOOD of the  inhabitants. So it is a village identifiable with people and life---for at least 1/2 of the year or more while also just being a dry seasonal lake at least in some part of the year. Generally however, it is referenced as an "inhabited" location locally. As for why you may not see something on satellite, well it is not a dynamic picture but a simple capture depending on "when" taken can have multiple contrasting realities. Generally the grazing lands are refered to as "Reserves" by the people and permanent structures are environmentally discouraged not to mention inconvenient. Hopefully that answered your question. Feel free to always ask me a question if you have need. Best
user_18305684 (2023-06-25 22:17:15+00:00): Hi,

very good and precise answer, thanks a lot.

With these informations, I changed the tags to something maybe better : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10243327592

What do you think of this ? 

I also add a description in english to sum up what you said : you can add a description in Somali if you want/agree with my changes.

Best regards
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-21 10:33:32+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11001156736/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
zstadler (2023-08-15 15:16:10+00:00): שלום יניב,

תודה על תרומתך ל
OpenStreetMap!!!

בעריכה זו הוספת נקודת מים והשתמשת בתיוג
man_made=water_tap

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11001212645

כנראה שלא ידעת שהתיוג הזה לא אומר שהמים טובים לשתיה.

במקרים שהמים טובים לשתיה, מקובל להשתמש בתיוג
amenity=drinking_water

אם מדובר על ברז של מי שתיה, אנא עדכן את התיוג 

בהצלחה בהמשך,
זאב
aTarom (2023-06-23 13:35:06+00:00): Hola jmp_99_, please check that the name of the address matches the name of the street without capitalizing it
example
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11001234526/history
"Carrer SEGADORS" -> "Carrer dels Segadors"
Cheers
jmp_99_ (2023-06-28 09:57:25+00:00): Hola aTarom,

We know that it is all in capital letters, and we want to put it in lower case as you say, the problem is that the database where we have obtained the information does not allow us to change it. Likewise, we take it into account, and we will try to resolve this mistake.

Thanks
NorthCrab_upload (2023-06-23 08:00:15+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2779655572
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1184404571

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
mga_geo (2023-06-26 05:44:02+00:00): Bonjour,
Vos modifications inversent l'ordre des ways sur les relations route=bus.
Marc
mga_geo (2023-06-28 06:57:37+00:00): Pas de réponse ?
simon_geovelo (2023-06-28 14:26:45+00:00): Bonjour,
Désolé pour le désagrément. JOSM à rajouter les segment créer dans les relations bus lors de la découpe des segments. Mais je n'ai pas vérifié l'ordre d'ajout des nouveaux segments.
Je vais faire attention pour mes prochaines modification.
Merci d'avoir corrigé l'erreur et de me l'avoir signalé.
Simon
julcnx (2024-04-24 08:34:51+00:00): Hey, welcome to OSM and thanks for your contributions! I noticed you've marked some roads as 'living_street.' One tip for future edits: you should tag these as 'highway=residential' instead. This is because there aren't any rules in Thailand that specifically lower speed limits or give pedestrians priority in residential areas. 
Also narrow motorcycle paths should be tagged as 'highway=path'. You can read more about this on the Thailand wiki. If you have any questions, feel free to ask. Cheers, Julien
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Thailand#Urban_and_Local_Road_wide_enough_for_motor_cars
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137676532
NorthCrab_upload (2023-06-23 08:10:13+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1139749758

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2023-06-23 08:20:18+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1139749759

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2023-06-23 08:20:17+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1139749757
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1139749760

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
gscscnd (2023-06-23 08:52:50+00:00): Cześć! Całkiem szybko de facto wycofałeś moją robotę. Korespondowałem z Towarzystwem Entuzjastów Kolei i przerobiłem tagowanie linii 176 i 192 (oraz bocznicy do Bukowa) na podstawie ich informacji. Głównie chodziło o zmianę railway=disused na railway=yes+railway:preserved=yes, bo linie są używane (jakkolwiek okazjonalnie) w drezynowym ruchu turystycznym i technicznym. Przeczytaj proszę dyskusje przy poprzednich zestawach zmian. Musimy uzgodnić wspólne stanowisko, nie ma sensu żeby jeden drugiemu zmiany wycofywał.
gscscnd (2023-06-23 08:54:25+00:00): W nieco innym temacie: do czego służy railway:track_ref=1 na całej długości linii? Czy tego tagu nie powinniśmy stosować tylko na stacjach?
Anas masuris (2023-06-23 09:07:47+00:00): Okazjonalnie oznacza dokładnie jak często? Nie ma tagu railway=yes. Przeczytałem poprzednie discussion i ok, mogę się zgodzić na przywrócenie "użytkowania"

railway:track_ref=* służy do oznaczania numeru toru. W teorii niby się ogranicza do stacji, ale bardzo często na schematach i wykazach (np. maksymalna prędkość, maks. nacisk na oś) figuruje oznaczanie torów szlakowych (niekiedy z odmiennymi numerami niż na stacjach) - nie tylko PKP PLK. Z tego względu taguję tor główny zasadniczy z numerem toru. Część od strony Olzy jest zarośnięta po głowę, więc tamto należy zostawić jako nieużytkowane
Anas masuris (2023-06-23 09:07:55+00:00): Zaraz przywrócę
gscscnd (2023-06-23 09:14:29+00:00): railway=yes źle mi się napisało, miało być oczywiście railway=rail.

Co dokładnie planujesz przywrócić?
Anas masuris (2023-06-23 09:16:30+00:00): Tam, gdzie jest draisine=yes, to railway=rail i railway:preserved=yes
gscscnd (2023-06-23 09:24:47+00:00): A co myślisz o usage=tourism?
Anas masuris (2023-06-23 09:36:32+00:00): Nie lubię tego usage, bo psuje ORM (bo dev chyba porzucili projekt). Ale jeśli jest bardziej pasujący, to niech będzie. Chociaż nie nazwałbym ruchu na tej linii o istotnym znaczeniu turystycznym ani o dużym popycie
gscscnd (2023-06-23 11:29:17+00:00): Co do ORM, „porzucili” to może za dużo powiedziane, na listach się odzywają, na gicie jakieś zmiany wpadają, ale bywało lepiej. W aktualnym stanie, żeby coś poprawić, trzeba samemu łatkę przygotować, jak będzie dobrze zrobiona, to raczej ją w sensownym czasie dołączą.

usage=tourism nie wymaga dużego/istotnego ruchu.
gscscnd (2023-07-09 17:09:20+00:00): Przywróciłem usage=tourism:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138304425
gscscnd (2025-02-18 15:45:43+00:00): FWIW:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162645567
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162645602
Zmiana z rail na disused.