piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2025-10-30 05:45:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description
NeisBot (2025-10-30 05:45:41+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Electrician in Drummoyne"
nevw (2025-10-30 06:45:49+00:00): Hi, I deleted the business details added to a footway junction.
You need to place a new node (or point) at the location that your business operates from and add all you relevant business tags to that point.
NeisReview (2025-11-01 19:24:11+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173959385

Thanks, nevw
maraf24 (2025-11-19 22:20:34+00:00): Coś się nie do końca tutaj się zgadza...
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1446200867 - tu jest w zasadzie tylko jedno drzewo (jesion), drugie to krzak bzu

openstreetmap.org/way/1446200866 - tutaj jest tylko jedno drzewko

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1446200865 - słabo pasuje to do tree row, bo jest tu tylko jedno normalne drzewo i warto było je właśnie oznaczyć jako natural=tree

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/290607231 - to nie jest park, tylko skwer/zieleniec

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1446200856 - tutaj drzewa są blisko płotu, a nie tak oddalone.
Marek_P (2025-11-20 05:58:05+00:00): Dziękuję za uwagi!
1. OK, przerobiłem na drzewo. Kwestia jak traktować bez. Dla mnie to bardziej małe drzewo niż krzak, ale to kwestia uznaniowa.
2. OK, też chyba bez.
3. Ja bym zostawił, bo jest jedno duże drzewo i dwa kolejne bzy. Jeśli uważasz, że tak jest źle, nie będę się upierał.
Wszystkie te trzy elementy można by, przy mniejszej dokładności, spiąć jednym tree row, ale jak ma być dokładniej, to niech będzie.

4. Patrzę w historię i widzę że już raz był tam park, ale wycofany. W związku z tym pytanie – jak otagować takie miejsce? landuse=grass nie oddaje istoty rzeczy. Park to najbliższe co znalazłem (choć wg wiki powinien być duży), ale jeśli masz pomysł na coś innego - chętnie będę stosował.
4. Racja, dociągnąłem bliżej płotu
maraf24 (2025-11-20 11:44:49+00:00): 1. Dwa drzewa, do tego o bardzo różnej wysokości, cieżko nazwać szpalerem drzew.
3. Tu jest problem, ile trzeba tych drzew (i jakich), by było tree row. Nie jest to zdefiniowane, a jakiś limit by się przydał.
4. Ja takie skwery taguje jako village_green. landuse=grass też nie jest zły, bo większość tam to trawka, drzew jest kilka + żywopłot. Nie jest to park, bo ludzie tam nie chodzą i nie przesiadują (mimo obecnej Ławeczki Mieszkańca). Park jest niedaleko, na placu Westerplatte, choć to jest też formalnie skwer/zieleniec. Tam jednak funkcja parkowa jest oczywista.
Dzięki za poprawki :)
Marek_P (2025-11-20 13:46:11+00:00): 1 i 2. Z kolei oznaczanie każdego drzewa rodzi ten problem, że trzeba każdego z nich pilnować z osobna. I tak źle i tak niedobrze.
4. Wypisz wymaluj wpis z wiki vilage_green z sekcji "niewłaściwe użycie" ;)
literan (2025-10-31 19:36:19+00:00): название улицы неверное и номер дома неверный. лучше на POI вовсе не ставить адреса, чем ставить неправильные....
literan (2025-10-31 19:36:34+00:00): ну и как вишенка - Лицей давно замаплен
BCNorwich (2025-10-30 07:07:26+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Address tags corrected. 

Regards Bernard.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-30 06:30:58+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13269594230

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Michaall99 (2025-10-30 14:05:46+00:00): Dzień dobry,
w imieniu społeczności OpenStreetMap dziękuję za Pana wkład w rozwój mapy.
Chciałbym jednak zwrócić uwagę na sposób dodawania numerów telefonów. Wprowadzane numery nie zawierają numeru kierunkowego kraju (dla Polski jest to +48), co jest ważne i zgodne z zasadami OSM.
Zachęcam do uzupełnienia tego zarówno w przyszłych edycjach, jak i w już zmapowanych obiektach.

Serdecznie pozdrawiam!
amunak (2025-10-30 09:04:33+00:00): Do we really need to fully delete "illegal" trails (whatever that means - are they signed as no entry, or fenced around)?

Because if they exist in reality - even if illegal to enter - they should be kept and only marked with appropriate access=* tags.
ufoncz (2025-10-30 09:21:19+00:00): Nowadays, the owner is fighting against the existence of the trails (chunks of trees, destroyed "features", and so on). More importantly, forest harvesting will start soon in the area (trees are marked and loggers are nearby already). I don't want to be the person who endangers people (or trail builders) by making the trails visible on the map. And there's a big chance the forest will be completely different when the harvest ends.
amunak (2025-10-30 09:31:03+00:00): I've seen that happen quite often, where there will be logs and barricades on paths, but they can be easily circumnavigated and it's not actually illegal to do so.

I'd still rather go for having the trails in the map, with obstacles potentially marked (barrier=log or such), and maybe just add a note in the map to re-check these after a certain date.
tkk (2025-10-30 10:05:38+00:00): Exactly, if the trail exists on the ground, then it should not be deleted from map, that is wrong for sure. Marking simple access=no  should be enough to declare it is not legal to use them.
ufoncz (2025-10-30 10:15:18+00:00): I know this OSM rule of thumb. For the aforementioned reasons, I believe it's better to not have those trails displayed now. If you believe they should be there at all cost, I don't want to have my (nick)name displayed next to them.
tkk (2025-10-30 10:33:21+00:00): And it is displayed anywhere? I'm not aware of that. Please revert your deletion changes.
ufoncz (2025-10-30 12:02:17+00:00): Yes. It's. The change log is public.
tkk (2025-10-30 12:24:17+00:00): You can not remove the history. Deleting the data will not make it better. The history is not displayed on any map etc. your name is still not displayed anywhere on the map etc. In any case by mapping any feature existing in reality you are not responsible for its usage or misusage, legal or illegal.
ufoncz (2025-10-30 13:07:43+00:00): It's displayable on OSM, that's enough. I feel I can remove the data I entered. I'm not trying to prevent anyone else from putting the trails on the map, though. There's a big chance it'll be more accurate than mine anyway.
Kovoschiz (2025-10-30 09:47:02+00:00): 1. Please don't add `man_made=pier` directly when it's not constructed yet. `landuse=construction` + `construction:man_made=` has already been added.
2. `=pier` is for perpendicular ones projecting into the sea, not the same as loose colloquial meaning of any ship-berthing facilities. `=quay` has been used, as how it's named.
marmara_editor (2025-11-07 13:35:14+00:00): Hi, the road you added does not reach to 17018 Sokak. In satellite view its blurry and not visible enough. I'm already detailing this city through local knowledge, street views from 3rd party sources, literal in person visits and government agencies maps. I've fixed this road in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174334648
borovac (2025-11-07 13:45:00+00:00): Thanks, it looked to me on the satellite image as if the road went around the building.
Thanks for the correction, as a local mapper you have more information.
Baloo Uriza (2025-10-30 13:49:34+00:00): This POI contains ad copy, which is inappropriate in OSM.  This POI is also in the middle of an intersection, not a place of business.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173977743
dadavid (2025-11-27 09:21:03+00:00): Hi, 

woher stammen diese Daten? Warst du vor Ort? 
zum Beispiel hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1446211849

Dort sind sicher keine highway=service, sondern highway=path. 

Viele Grüße

David
Supaplex030 (2025-10-31 09:28:03+00:00): Hallo salkinniklas,

danke für deine Bearbeitungen, die ich hier aber leider rückgängig machen musste. Du hast das Radfahren in einigen Grünanlagen "erlaubt", wo es offiziell nicht erlaubt ist. In den Berliner "Geschützten Grünanlagen" (Grünflächen mit dem "Tulpenschild") ist das Radfahren nicht gestattet, solange es nicht explizit durch Beschilderung erlaubt ist. Solche Beschilderungen gab es hier aber nicht.  In machen fällen steht dort sogar explizit, dass es nicht erlaubt ist (siehe z.B. https://www.mapillary.com/app/?z=18.575360348671403&lat=52.442133599972&lng=13.4114897&pKey=182256304310632&focus=photo&x=0.544571369262626&y=0.5070895255869641&zoom=0.02876391518308681).

Der Weg/Park am Teltowkanal hat zwar kein solches Tulpenschild, dort gibt es aber ein Zeichen 250 (rote Sperrscheibe). Formal schließt das die Benutzung mit allen Fahrzeugen aus, also auch Fahrrädern. In diesem Fall vermutlich unglücklich beschildert, aber in erster Linie orientieren wir uns nicht am faktischen Verkehrsverhalten, sondern der rechtlichen Lage.

Lg, Alex
NeisBot (2025-10-30 07:29:35+00:00): Hi jp1212, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 92% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 1 highway(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=173960680
Frans S (2025-10-30 09:04:20+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
A: Inaccurate mapping. 
E: Buildings not squared or rounded.
High building(s) incorrect mapped. 
Check this footage how to map high buildings

https://youtu.be/dsfUcslLtVc?si=yH6eWDbsb_ILAVb9
 Or See par 20 chapter About Buildings


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173960760
Frans S (2025-10-30 09:07:42+00:00): Please stay away from complex areas, like here, tall, high buildings which need a specific knowledge how to map them.
Please focus till you are experienced, on rural easy tasks.

Keep an eye on complex buildings. Especial the high rise (multi story) buildings and buildings which shows their sideviews  as well. Check this footage how to map these buildings 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dsfUcslLtVc
https://drive.google.com/file/d/13RTwH7sChRWrG5bIjysF2ripBgh3F5l4/view?usp=sharing 

Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173960760
Frans S (2025-10-30 09:09:01+00:00): Please stay away from complex areas, like here, tall, high buildings which need a specific knowledge how to map them.
Please focus till you are experienced , on rural easey tasks.

Keep an eye on complex buildings. Especial the high rise (multi story) buildings and buildings which shows their sideviews  as well. Check this footage how to map these buildings 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dsfUcslLtVc
https://drive.google.com/file/d/13RTwH7sChRWrG5bIjysF2ripBgh3F5l4/view?usp=sharing 

Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173960760
Frans S (2025-10-30 09:09:02+00:00): Please stay away from complex areas, like here, tall, high buildings which need a specific knowledge how to map them.
Please focus till you are experienced, on rural easy tasks.

Keep an eye on complex buildings. Especial the high rise (multi story) buildings and buildings which shows their sideviews  as well. Check this footage how to map these buildings 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dsfUcslLtVc
https://drive.google.com/file/d/13RTwH7sChRWrG5bIjysF2ripBgh3F5l4/view?usp=sharing 

Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173960760
SafwatHalaby (2025-10-30 09:07:05+00:00): We plan to do this country-wide soon. Discussion in https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/topic/137190

Please comment there if you have issues with this
SafwatHalaby (2025-10-30 09:07:26+00:00): מתוכנן לבצע את השינוי הזה בכלל ישראל, דיון כאן: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/topic/137190
mueschel (2025-11-01 13:09:38+00:00): All of these buildings have tags like "area_in_me", 'cat' or coordinates which shouldn't be in OSM.

Please read and follow our import guidelines before importing data!
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
literan (2025-10-31 19:35:01+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8747432551 а тут контакты старые удалить может?
empty_child (2025-10-31 19:38:53+00:00): А они актуальные))
Я так понял, что владельцы решили налезть на копирайт клейм, сделав лого с отсылкой на H&M. Но, как говорится, "маска выдает в тебе бандита", и BreadAndMeat есть ничто иное, как Хлеб&Мясо
literan (2025-10-31 20:49:22+00:00): понял)
woodpeck (2025-10-30 08:39:38+00:00): Dear jp1212, when you delete paths from OpenStreetMap, please provide an explanation for that in the changeset comment. "Modification" is not enough - we can see that you have modified something but we want to know why you think the path does not exist!
Frans S (2025-11-02 13:01:51+00:00): Keep an eye on complex buildings. Especial the high rise (multi story) buildings and buildings which shows their side views  as well. Check this footage how to map these buildings 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dsfUcslLtVc
https://drive.google.com/file/d/13RTwH7sChRWrG5bIjysF2ripBgh3F5l4/view?usp=sharing 

Don't forget to square each rectangular building as well.
Best regards and keep mapping
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:36:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
Kees 59 (2026-02-21 07:44:08+00:00): There was a tag inside another tag. I have extracted that.

Also there is a curious line from the border going inside the area, that does not fit with the way being an administrative boundary. Could you investigate please?
rskedgell (2025-10-30 16:25:23+00:00): Has the Victoria branch of Vagabond Wines at this location really closed and been replaced by your office?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-10-31 13:52:01+00:00): Hello "Glanz Digital Marketing" and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
Unfortunately there are a couple of problems here, so please follow the instructions in https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18893 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-10-31 13:55:23+00:00): The problems included:
Changing a bunch of things in OSM from things that still seem to exist (e.g. https://www.vagabondwines.co.uk/locations/victoria ).  
Use of a contact website on Google Sites(!) suggesting an edit by a schoolchild rather than a genuine marketing company. 
Use of a name that matches a different company: there is apparently a marketing company with this name, in Slough: https://glanzmarketing.co.uk/contact-us/ .  I suspect that they are not related to this edit.
tomhukins (2025-12-03 14:02:15+00:00): Thank you for your helpful work improving the map.

I notice these changes add "intermittent=yes" to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/760195916/history/54 where it seems to make no sense.  I assume this is a mistake, but wanted to check.

I noticed this following discussion on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174577957
Loshu (2025-12-04 08:18:07+00:00): Ooops Indeed it doesn't. I've removed the intermittent.   I think this was a miss-click while selecting spillways (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/144148116 and those immediately next to it)
tomhukins (2025-12-04 18:04:49+00:00): Thank you for fixing this in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175477758 - I have also fixed another case of the same problem in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175510217.
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:35:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 186321238, 186320991, 186321014, 186321023, 186321172, 186321185, 186321214, 186321231, 186321009, 186320999, 186321226, 186321212, 186321183, 186321032, 186321156, 186321202, 186321188, 186321193, 186321207, 186320994, 186321004, 186321218, 186321196 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Australia
maro21 (2025-10-30 15:30:42+00:00): Czemu usunąłeś kolory dachów?
MHNS (2025-10-30 14:45:50+00:00): This trail was created a few years ago illegally and in secret.  Westchester County Parks stepped in and remediated the illegal trail and it no longer exists. They removed all of the illegal markers that had been nailed into trees and covered the entire trail with brush to help it grow back.  Please remove it.  There is no trail.
ZLima12 (2025-10-31 00:04:47+00:00): Hi,

Even if the trail was created "illegally and in secret", it should not be removed from the map. Legality only might affect the access value. That being said, this trail is on public land, so I'm not sure that `access=private` or `access=no` is appropriate.

The trail should only be removed if, as you are now saying, it truly does not exist at all. I will see if I can survey it sometime soon to verify that this is the case.
NeisBot (2025-10-30 08:23:34+00:00): Hi LupulSiberian, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 10 highway(s)
- 1 building(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=173962617
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:43:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321542 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Papua New Guinea
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-24 22:41:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 186321476 where the changeset comment is: revert airport edits by user olehz - Ivory Coast
rempshaener (2025-10-30 18:53:05+00:00): Hallo,

auch hier noch einmal der Hinweis auf den korrekten Umgang mit emergency=water_tank.
Am Beispiel www.openstreetmap.org/node/13269755116: Das sieht für mich wie ein Teich aus. Dann ist das Tagging aber falsch.
Worum handelt es sich denn? Einen Teich? Hat dieser eine feste Verrohrung? Dient er ausschließlich Zwecken der Feuerwehr?

Viele Grüße
pitscheplatsch (2025-10-30 09:25:16+00:00): This changeset appears to follow a pattern of vandalism similar to previous incidents affecting the same map elements, which were also reverted.

I would therefore appreciate it if other members of the community could review this changeset as well.

Thank you!
pitscheplatsch (2025-10-30 09:26:51+00:00): Hi, could you share why several mapped name:ru entries were deleted here?
Nick24_ (2025-10-30 09:50:10+00:00): Привіт. По одній простій причині. Наша дерусифікація недостатня.
pitscheplatsch (2025-10-30 09:55:40+00:00): Danke für die Antwort. Ich habe dies dann einmal bei der DWG gemeldet. Grüße.
Nick24_ (2025-10-30 10:03:42+00:00): Майже всі зміни, які вносив на карту, я оглядав особисто на місцевості і маю фото розмітки та дорожніх знаків. Намагаюсь перенести на карти те що є в реалії. Якщо є конкретні зауваження, можемо обговорити.
tastrax (2025-10-30 10:37:53+00:00): Many thanks for this update.
philippec (2025-10-30 09:59:06+00:00): Die staat toch binnen het afdakje, en u zet het erbuiten ?
djsa (2025-10-30 14:47:20+00:00): In de vorige versie stond de AED aan de noordkant van het gebouw, niet bij het afdak aan de ingang.
philippec (2025-10-30 15:11:42+00:00): Bedankt, nu staan we gelijk = 
we zijn alle twee verkeerd.
Ik heb me laten misleiden door de note.
Of interpreteer ik het gebouw verkeerd ?
Hufkratzer (2025-10-30 22:14:15+00:00): Hi,
You've mixed up the tags.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1446227934 should be tagged as riding centre (leisure=horse_riding) and
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1446227924 and
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1446227919 should be tagged as riding arenas (leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian)
Compare
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a#Riding_centre_(equestrian)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1298935719#map=17/-16.942621/145.746131&layers=P (example)
Manuel H (2026-06-06 08:46:51+00:00): Hallo,

ist das lokal ausgeschildert?
Online kann ich zu der Verfügung nichts finden. 

MFG,
Manuel
Stryker24 (2026-06-06 10:03:09+00:00): Hallo, die Ausschilderung direkt vor Ort sollte durch den Landesforstbetrieb erfolgen. Online ist nach meiner Kenntnis nichts eingestellt worden.
Wenn der Landesforstbetrieb alles wie mit der Stadt Thale abgestimmt umgesetzt hat, sollten beidseitig der Sperrung die Schilder stehen.
Manuel H (2026-06-07 08:13:42+00:00): Danke für die Antwort. Ich hatte gestern geplant, das Tal runter ins Bodetal zu wandern, bin dann aber das Dambachtal runter, weil ich nicht oben vor eine Sperre stehen wollte.
Vor Ort ist es aber so, dass im Bodetal bei beiden Wegen keine Sperrung eingerichtet ist. Den Weg am Bach bin ich ein Stück rein.
De facto ist damit das Mapping falsch.
Hast du Connections zu den Verantwortlichen?
Es wäre ja ok, wenn man eine Sperre einträgt, auch wenn es nicht beschildert ist, aber dann muss es eine öffentliche Quelle geben.
NeisBot (2025-10-30 08:56:49+00:00): Merhaba başak barin, OSM projesine hoş geldin ve katkıların için teşekkür ederiz!

İşbirliğini kolaylaştırmak ve diğerlerinin düzenlemelerini anlamalarına yardımcı olmak için yaptığın değişikliklere kısa bir açıklama eklemek en iyisidir. Açık yorumlar topluluğun çalışmalarını takip etmesine ve daha iyi geri bildirimde bulunmasına yardımcı olur. İyi yorum yazma ipuçlarını burada[1] bulabilirsin.
(Auto-translation)
---
Hi başak barin, welcome to the OSM projekt and thanks for your contribution!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish
NeisBot (2025-10-30 08:56:53+00:00): Burada harita düzenleme işlemlerine dayalı bir örnek yorum var: "Sokak, mahalle ve isim detayları ile terzi dükkanı eklendi"
(Auto-translation)
---
Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added tailor shop with street, neighbourhood, and name details"
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2025-10-30 22:20:04+00:00): @eftal erdoğan(user id:23452030). Bazı değişiklikleriniz vandalizm amaçlı. Bir binaya(way/865847491) "İZMİR KEHANESİ VUR VUR MALA GELSİN İMANA" adını, bir yola(way/1446230182) "SHEVCENKO KAVŞAĞI" adını, bir dereye(way/1446230183) "İNZAGHİ DERESİ" adını vermişsiniz. Bu değişikliklerinizi geri aldım. Lütfen tekrarlamayınız.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173997387