piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-06-14 22:37:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 152700875, 152700850 where the changeset comment is: Reverting vandalism, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16187 et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-06-14 22:54:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152701150 where the changeset comment is: Reverting vandalism, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16187 et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-06-14 22:54:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152701150 where the changeset comment is: Reverting vandalism, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16187 et al
xrefz (2024-06-14 21:55:50+00:00): I revert it because the road/way is all over the World
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/96446526

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152700112
Hungerburg (2024-06-14 22:11:09+00:00): You rather report to the DWG.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-06-14 22:53:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152701150 where the changeset comment is: Reverting vandalism, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16187 et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-06-14 22:37:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 152700875, 152700850 where the changeset comment is: Reverting vandalism, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16187 et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-06-14 22:54:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152701150 where the changeset comment is: Reverting vandalism, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16187 et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-06-14 22:37:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 152700875, 152700850 where the changeset comment is: Reverting vandalism, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16187 et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-06-14 22:36:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 152700875, 152700850 where the changeset comment is: Reverting vandalism, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16187 et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-06-14 22:53:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152701150 where the changeset comment is: Reverting vandalism, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16187 et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-06-14 22:37:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 152700875, 152700850 where the changeset comment is: Reverting vandalism, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16187 et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-06-14 22:37:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 152700875, 152700850 where the changeset comment is: Reverting vandalism, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16187 et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-06-14 22:37:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 152700875, 152700850 where the changeset comment is: Reverting vandalism, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16187 et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-06-14 22:37:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 152700875, 152700850 where the changeset comment is: Reverting vandalism, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16187 et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-06-14 22:54:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 152701150 where the changeset comment is: Reverting vandalism, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16187 et al
rskedgell (2024-06-15 16:09:59+00:00): Unfortunately, this created an issue rather than fixing it. Adding motor_vehicle=designated means that the road is intended for use by ALL motor vehicles. Signage at the entrance is no entry (for all vehicles) except local buses.

TfL and bus company tow trucks and Newham street cleaning vehicles have explicit permission which is covered by access=private.

I have re-tagged the roads as access=private + bus=designated and removed the motor_vehicle=designated tags.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152728183
Ltrlg (2024-06-14 21:16:56+00:00): *dans Saint-Malo
AndersAndersson (2024-06-14 22:08:15+00:00): Because of this vandalism to OSM me, and probably many other, have stopped the financial support to Ukraine. There will be less money to buy mine clearing equipment, night vision and other things.
This vandalism costs ukrainian lifes.
conifermapper (2024-06-16 06:50:09+00:00): What a Russian imbecile
literan (2024-06-15 10:52:52+00:00): не надо писать слово "деревня" в тег addr:city. Там нужно только название
literan (2024-06-15 10:53:34+00:00): перед буквой "Б", обозначающей номер корпуса, пробел не нужен

ознакомьтесь с правилами адресации https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%90%D0%B4%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%B0#%D0%9D%D1%83%D0%BC%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%B2
miluethi (2024-06-14 21:35:48+00:00): Hi Morgane,

Please square out all your building shapes. Most of your recent contributions are excellent, but a few of them have odd shapes.

Thank you for contributing to OSM Nicaragua.
rskedgell (2024-06-14 22:07:13+00:00): Hi,

I can see what you were trying to do with this edit, but the tag motor_vehicle=designated means that it is designated for ALL motor vehicles. Think of the designated access value as being like yes, but stronger. For example, public footpaths are generally tagged designation=public_footpath + foot=designated.

The previous tagging of access=private + bus=yes means that buses may always use this road, but other transport modes, like TfL tow trucks and Newham street cleaning vehicles may only do so with explicit permission. It might make more sense to change it to access=private + bus=designated
KiloThree (2024-06-14 23:11:06+00:00): Isn't that end of Lincoln St 1 way? After Portsmouth Street? Or did that change recently?
Edward35 (2024-06-14 23:23:08+00:00): Changed a few weeks ago, UniversalHub has a photo of it if you're interested.
SomeoneElse (2024-06-14 21:42:13+00:00): please don't revert these piecemeal
empty_child (2024-06-14 21:54:59+00:00): FYI, it's a valid changeset. I didn't know about the spam attack
SomeoneElse (2024-06-14 21:57:55+00:00): please do not revert these piecemeal
akimapbuilder (2024-06-17 06:36:47+00:00): Hi! I had to revert your changeset since the road you added overlaps with an already existing road.
syntex (2024-06-17 14:54:20+00:00): Dlaczego skasowałeś poprawne znaczniki z budynku?
NeisBot (2024-06-14 22:12:25+00:00): Hi armywildcat1, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1292515387

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
GeeMaps! (2024-06-14 23:32:40+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152701715
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-14 23:34:33+00:00): Hello Army. I know reverting your work isn't a nice way to welcome you to OSM, but please don't map imaginary features!
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-14 23:37:19+00:00): Hello again, Army. Here you've mapped the entire complex as a single building, which it obviously isn't. Could you please modify this to map the actual main building as a building, with the rest of the area as parking lots, driveways etc? Thanks!
InsertUser (2024-06-17 23:35:50+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Pease save in between editing in widely spaced areas. Large changesets make it difficult to check for errors.
ma-rt-in (2024-06-16 08:19:34+00:00): Hallo, hier war nix falsch.
Das Gebäude gehört zu einem Seniorenheim.
Durch deine Änderung wurde gänzlich das Gebäude gelöscht. Ich passe das wieder an.

Gruß
Adam Dunn (2024-06-16 02:03:33+00:00): It looks like you added a new run "Gentle Giant" on top of the existing run "Gentle Giant" (so there's two runs on top of each other).
The new run also looks like it goes through some trees and a building. Was this a rough trace from GPS tracks? If you're trying to add a little ski-in/ski-out path, maybe a short unnamed run that branches off the bottom of Gentle Giant and goes between the trees and buildings would be better? Sorry I can't help more, it's been about 2 decades since I last visited Sun Peaks.
jmaspons (2024-07-27 10:11:33+00:00): És correcta Monesma i Caixigar a name? o seria Queixigar?
Jordi MF (2024-06-14 22:53:16+00:00): Se han revertido todos los changesets de este usuario porque es un usuario bloqueado decenas de veces con cuentas múltiples (https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/usuarios-editando-en-espana-bajo-sospecha-vandalismo-malas-practicas-y-otros/2510/), por lo que sistemáticamente incumple los Términos de Uso de OSM (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenStreetMap_account#Account_Names_and_Multi_Account_Policies y https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Terms_of_Use#VI._Account_cancellation_or_suspension).

Modifica la toponimia oficial para que no aparezca en valenciano aunque así lo dictamine la Acadèmia Valenciana de la Llengua en la cartografía oficial de la Comunitat Valenciana. Tenemos permiso explícito de esta entidad que, según las leyes autonómicas, es la entidad encargada de la toponimia oficial.

Por otra parte, este usuario (y todas sus cuentas) está mapeando según las ortofotos, sin tener en cuenta que toda la zona se encuentra abancalada y llena de muros de contención; por eso los elimina. Elimina historiales y dibuja muros según la perspectiva de la ortofoto, lo cual es incorrecto porque añade un área ficticia, además de eliminar edificios en ruïnas (building=ruins) y otros elementos históricos.

Por otra parte, realiza múltiples pequeñas ediciones para evitar que sus cambios puedan ser revisados. Ante todo lo expuesta y las múltiples anomalías, no queda otra opción que revertir todos los changesets o nunca podremos seguir mejorando la base de datos. Tendríamos que estar horas revisando en detalle cada uno de los conjuntos de cambios y, por lo tanto, dejaríamos de lado seguir mapeando para añadir nueva información.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152701147
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-06-14 22:37:39+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 152698331, 152698337, 152698338, 152698342, 152698345, 152698347, 152698351, 152698354, 152698357, 152698359, 152698360, 152698362, 152698364, 152698365, 152698366, 152698367, 152698368, 152698371, 152698372, 152698373, 152698374, 152698376, 152698377, 152698378, 152698379, 152698380, 152698382, 152698385, 152698386, 152698387, 152698388, 152698389, 152698391, 152698392, 152698393, 152698395, 152698396, 152698399, 152698402, 152698403, 152698404, 152698520, 152698526, 152698532, 152698534, 152698536, 152698538, 152698541, 152698543, 152698546, 152698548, 152698550, 152698553, 152698555, 152698559, 152698562, 152698564, 152698567, 152698569, 152698572, 152698575, 152698585, 152698623, 152698624, 152698625, 152698626, 152698627, 152698629, 152698630, 152698631, 152698633, 152698634, 152698636, 152698637, 152698638, 152698639, 152698640, 152698641, 152698644, 152698645, 152698647, 152698649, 152698650, 152698651, 152698653, 152698654, 152698655, 152698656, 152698657, 152698658, 152698661, 152698663, 152698664, 152698665, 152698666, 152698668, 152698670, 152698672, 152698673, 152698676, 152698677, 152698700, 152698702, 152698703, 152698705, 152698706, 152698707, 152698709, 152698711, 152698712, 152698713, 152698714, 152698716, 152698717, 152698718, 152698719, 152698720, 152698721, 152698722, 152698724, 152698726, 152698727, 152698728, 152698730, 152698731, 152698733, 152698736, 152698739, 152698740, 152698741, 152698742, 152698744, 152698746, 152698749, 152698750, 152698752, 152698753, 152698754, 152698755, 152698775, 152698776, 152698777, 152698778, 152698780, 152698781, 152698782, 152698783, 152698784, 152698785, 152698786, 152698787, 152698788, 152698789, 152698790, 152698792, 152698793, 152698794, 152698795, 152698796, 152698798, 152698801, 152698805, 152698807, 152698809, 152698817, 152698818, 152698819, 152698820, 152698823, 152698825, 152698826, 152698827, 152698828, 152698829, 152698832, 152698841, 152698842, 152698843, 152698844, 152698857, 152698858, 152698860, 152698861, 152698862, 152698863, 152698864, 152698866, 152698868, 152698869, 152698870, 152698871, 152698873, 152698874, 152698876, 152698878, 152698879, 152698880, 152698881, 152698883, 152698884, 152698885, 152698887, 152698889, 152698890, 152698891, 152698892, 152698893, 152698894, 152698895, 152698897, 152698898, 152698900, 152698903, 152698914, 152699052, 152699057, 152699061, 152699082, 152699119, 152699121, 152699123, 152699124, 152699125, 152699127, 152699132, 152699135, 152699137, 152699138, 152699141, 152699142, 152699144, 152699146, 152699147, 152699150, 152699151, 152699152, 152699153, 152699156, 152699157, 152699158, 152699161, 152699162, 152699163, 152699165, 152699167, 152699170, 152699173, 152699175, 152699178, 152699180, 152699181, 152699185, 152699186, 152699187, 152699230, 152699232, 152699237, 152699239, 152699242, 152699246, 152699249, 152699254, 152699256, 152699747, 152699895, 152699922, 152700094, 152700112, 152700160.
Allison P (2024-06-15 20:32:13+00:00): This revert didn't completely work: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9230315
SomeoneElse (2024-06-16 08:34:03+00:00): Thanks - if you spot any others please let me know!
TheSwavu (2024-06-16 10:49:55+00:00): Didn't work for this one either:
https://osm.mapki.com/history/relation/9213003
TheSwavu (2024-06-16 11:07:20+00:00): Or this one https://osm.mapki.com/history/relation/9174320
Jordi MF (2024-06-14 22:53:17+00:00): Se han revertido todos los changesets de este usuario porque es un usuario bloqueado decenas de veces con cuentas múltiples (https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/usuarios-editando-en-espana-bajo-sospecha-vandalismo-malas-practicas-y-otros/2510/), por lo que sistemáticamente incumple los Términos de Uso de OSM (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenStreetMap_account#Account_Names_and_Multi_Account_Policies y https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Terms_of_Use#VI._Account_cancellation_or_suspension).

Modifica la toponimia oficial para que no aparezca en valenciano aunque así lo dictamine la Acadèmia Valenciana de la Llengua en la cartografía oficial de la Comunitat Valenciana. Tenemos permiso explícito de esta entidad que, según las leyes autonómicas, es la entidad encargada de la toponimia oficial.

Por otra parte, este usuario (y todas sus cuentas) está mapeando según las ortofotos, sin tener en cuenta que toda la zona se encuentra abancalada y llena de muros de contención; por eso los elimina. Elimina historiales y dibuja muros según la perspectiva de la ortofoto, lo cual es incorrecto porque añade un área ficticia, además de eliminar edificios en ruïnas (building=ruins) y otros elementos históricos.

Por otra parte, realiza múltiples pequeñas ediciones para evitar que sus cambios puedan ser revisados. Ante todo lo expuesta y las múltiples anomalías, no queda otra opción que revertir todos los changesets o nunca podremos seguir mejorando la base de datos. Tendríamos que estar horas revisando en detalle cada uno de los conjuntos de cambios y, por lo tanto, dejaríamos de lado seguir mapeando para añadir nueva información.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152701147
zorglubu (2024-06-17 12:05:23+00:00): Bonjour 7tonin,

Je ne suis pas sûr de l'intérêt d'ajouter sur la carte des chemins qui n'existent plus.
Si le chemin est encore visible, il peut alors être emprunté à pied, et c'est un highway=path. Sinon, si on ne peut plus le voir, il n'est plus vérifiable, il ne devrait pas être cartographié (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#Ne_cartographiez_pas_des_%C3%A9v%C3%A8nements_historiques_ou_des_%C3%A9l%C3%A9ments_qui_n'existent_plus)

le "disused:highway" me semble utile pour une grosse route, visible sur des photos,mais qui est totalement inutilisable dans la pratique. C'est une information pour les autres contributeurs, qui ne sera affichée nulle part.

Cordialement.
7tonin (2024-06-17 12:50:02+00:00): Bonjour, je fais cela pour rendre visible dans OsmAnd ces chemins. Ce qui permet de se repérer un peu mieux lorsque j'explore ces endroits.
Factuellement, le nombre de tels chemins qui ont ainsi pu être rendu au randonneurs est faible, voire très faible. Alors, il faudra peut-être changer mon fusil d'épaule ; voire le déposer.
zorglubu (2024-06-17 13:40:07+00:00): Ah effectivement, on les voit dans Osmand. Disons que si ça te permet temporairement d'aller les vérifier, pourquoi pas. Mais ensuite, soit ils existent, soit ils ont disparu depuis quelques générations ;-)
Le cadastre est plein de scories comme ça qui ne correspondent plus à rien.
7tonin (2024-06-17 15:05:11+00:00): Il reste la plupart du temps une empreinte au sol, parfois des résidus de murets, souvent c'est peuplé d'arbres. Réouvrir certains de ces itinéraires, les publier sur openstreetmap, ne suffit pas à recréer un usage. Une fois, il m'est arrivé d'entendre un témoignage selon lequel il n'y a pas de chemin là. La raison étant que ça se referme très vite.
Je me demande quels sont les problèmes posés pas la présence de ces scories dans la base openstreetmap.
zorglubu (2024-06-17 15:49:25+00:00): Si on voit quelque chose sur le terrain, ça mérite d'être cartographié ;-)
Mais la philosophie OSM me semble être qu'on ne cartographie pas des objets historiques qui n'ont pas laissé de trace. Ça doit rester "vérifiable".
Jordi MF (2024-06-14 22:53:18+00:00): Se han revertido todos los changesets de este usuario porque es un usuario bloqueado decenas de veces con cuentas múltiples (https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/usuarios-editando-en-espana-bajo-sospecha-vandalismo-malas-practicas-y-otros/2510/), por lo que sistemáticamente incumple los Términos de Uso de OSM (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenStreetMap_account#Account_Names_and_Multi_Account_Policies y https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Terms_of_Use#VI._Account_cancellation_or_suspension).

Modifica la toponimia oficial para que no aparezca en valenciano aunque así lo dictamine la Acadèmia Valenciana de la Llengua en la cartografía oficial de la Comunitat Valenciana. Tenemos permiso explícito de esta entidad que, según las leyes autonómicas, es la entidad encargada de la toponimia oficial.

Por otra parte, este usuario (y todas sus cuentas) está mapeando según las ortofotos, sin tener en cuenta que toda la zona se encuentra abancalada y llena de muros de contención; por eso los elimina. Elimina historiales y dibuja muros según la perspectiva de la ortofoto, lo cual es incorrecto porque añade un área ficticia, además de eliminar edificios en ruïnas (building=ruins) y otros elementos históricos.

Por otra parte, realiza múltiples pequeñas ediciones para evitar que sus cambios puedan ser revisados. Ante todo lo expuesta y las múltiples anomalías, no queda otra opción que revertir todos los changesets o nunca podremos seguir mejorando la base de datos. Tendríamos que estar horas revisando en detalle cada uno de los conjuntos de cambios y, por lo tanto, dejaríamos de lado seguir mapeando para añadir nueva información.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152701147
seattlefyi (2024-06-24 04:50:59+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM! Thanks for the edits! I squared the corners of your buildings a little, but otherwise looks great. Thanks again!
RW2000 (2024-07-08 03:06:49+00:00): Way 1292524930 has been demolished for over a year and a half. Please ensure that import data is up to date.
RW2000 (2024-07-08 03:35:18+00:00): Way 1292524932 is nonsensical. Unsure if the intent was to map the building under construction or the former Adam’s Center.
kucai (2024-06-15 08:14:45+00:00): salam. ni nama penuhnya Lorong xyz? 
dalam osm, segala yang shortform kita akan expandkan, cthnya bkt - bukit, tg - tanjung/tanjong jln - jalan dan sebagainya. Tujuannya ialah supaya standard, manakala pembekal peta boleh shortformkan apa yang diorang nak.

satu lagi, lorong ni rasanya utk sebelah tegak timur tu aja kan? manakala jalan yang panjang dan datar tu namanya lain. Kalau gitu, kena 'potong' jalan tu kepada 2 bahgian, dan kekalkan nama pada yang berkenaan sahaja.  Harap maklong :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152701901
silversurfer83 (2024-06-15 06:49:40+00:00): Dear Niels,

please DO NOT edit a sanitary dump station in Normandie and an enforcement relation in no mans land between Bielefeld and Hannover in one changeset.

This could have been two little edits and everything would be fine.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
tyfi (2024-06-15 01:15:54+00:00): To be more specific, K was ref'd to the southern border of Clever, but both Streetside-captured signage and official open data from MoDOT indicate K snakes through the town to hit MO 14.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-29 12:00:15+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11982171886/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
diamondarmorsteve (2024-08-30 17:36:28+00:00): It seems like you've made an error with the place=village node for Maxwell. Could you please go back and correct it to how it should be?
Kovirii (2024-12-22 22:45:20+00:00): Please respond to changeset comments.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152703141
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-29 12:04:11+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11982168153/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
LockOnGuy (2024-06-15 02:25:42+00:00): Source for changing the highway classifications?
aduxas (2024-11-06 12:23:19+00:00): Shouldn't the tracks here be marked as private?  This seems to be a private nursery.  Possibly customers/permissive -- I don't know this business.
ZeLonewolf (2024-11-06 13:03:37+00:00): Access is unclear so I didn't tag it
literan (2024-06-15 10:42:10+00:00): кривой формат адрески

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%90%D0%B4%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%B0#%D0%9D%D1%83%D0%BC%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%B2
ОксанаМ (2024-06-18 03:35:20+00:00): Добрый день, инструкцию изучила, видимо, на озон некорректно оформляются задания. Учту, что нужно ставить пробел перед буквами "к", "с", "вл"
pootriarch (2024-06-15 03:21:03+00:00): this is a biggie and i'm sure there's something that could be done better. documents the marked bike routes at this scary intersection. i visited to ensure aerial was correct but unsure mapping is optimal
5m4u9 (2024-06-16 07:03:55+00:00): Hola, gracias por añadir el nombre de la calle, ojala también puedas añadir de las calles alrededor.
canfe (2024-06-23 10:42:48+00:00): Ma coltivano rabarbaro, barbabietole o è un plant_nursery di altro?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152704714
canfe (2024-07-01 16:34:52+00:00): Corretto ma l'azienda non è lì, andrebbe spostata.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152704714
arkarjun (2024-06-28 19:15:39+00:00): corrected spelling in the name as per the board in the  Mappilary image
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152704976
canfe (2024-08-18 08:50:46+00:00): width=1,5 va messo col punto.
Ho corretto
tyfi (2024-06-15 05:36:51+00:00): I am aware of the concurrency issue in Scott City between K and N, and I'm researching the correct alignments now.