piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
zielonytraktor (2023-08-25 20:53:43+00:00): Zastanawiam się skąd i jak mógł powstać ten błąd - aby móc go wyeliminować w przyszłości. Bo jeśli edytuję drogę, to zaznaczam sekcje i z menu wybieram rodzaj obiektu (drogi). Więc z automatu wywala construction ze znaczników i zamienia na odpowiedni dla typu drogi. Więc nie mam pojęcia jak?
olo81 (2023-08-26 19:11:10+00:00): Nie używam ID, niestety nic nie podpowiem.
GerdP (2025-04-12 05:49:02+00:00): Moin aus Wildeshausen!
Ich erfasse seit einigen Monaten die Pipeline-Marker in der Gegend um Wildeshausen, um die Pipelines genauer zu erfassen. Dabei stoße ich auf das Problem, das von Dir bereits Leitungen erfasst sind, die aber so nicht passen,weil es dort sehr viel mehr Leitungen gibt und die eingezeichneten Wege mal zu der einen, mal zu einer anderen Leitung passen. Ich hoffe, Du bist nicht böse, wenn da nicht viel von Deiner Arbeit übrig bleibt. Zumindest hat es dabei mir geholfen, die Stellen zu finden, an denen die gelben Pfosten zu finden sein müssten.
_klaas_ (2025-04-12 08:16:36+00:00): Hallo Gerd,

Kein Problem, wenn du vor Ort es genauer und besser ermitteln kannst, dann bin ich froh, dass dir meine Vorarbeiten zumindest weiterhelfen. Ändere, was geändert werden muss. Viel Spaß und Danke
alix_geovelo (2023-07-18 14:27:15+00:00): erreur d'envoi de changeset, veuillez m'excuser.
tesp (2023-07-24 16:31:29+00:00): Nummenpuistokatu näyttää olevan auki liikenteelle?
Larmax (2023-07-24 16:39:39+00:00): Sen voisi sitten avata. Tuo kohta näytti julkaisuhetkellä olleen pidemmäksi aikaa suljettu, mutta ehkei ollut sittenkään
NorthCrab_upload (2023-07-18 13:30:23+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11052952450

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
:-} (2023-07-18 13:35:15+00:00): Zauważyłem,że w swojej edycji zepsułem relacje.Próbowałem je naprawić ale mi nie wychodzi,więc zostawiam tak jak jest
SzymonH (2023-07-19 05:54:19+00:00): Polecam Relatify: https://relatify.monicz.dev/
MarcoR (2023-07-19 08:50:21+00:00): il centro sportivo era già stato mappato come fitness centre (palestra) lì accanto: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/824244433
Zylite (2023-07-19 09:02:48+00:00): Grazie mille, chiedo scusa per la svista
MarcoR (2023-07-19 11:48:57+00:00): Figurati, può capitare :)
A proposito, se ritieni che sia più adatto mapparlo come "centro sportivo" cambialo pure.
Zylite (2023-08-17 09:11:39+00:00): So che é passato un po', ma no, va benissimo fitness centre. Grazie per la risposta :)
Frans S (2023-07-20 12:39:46+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Why did you remove the highway tack on well mapped highways ?
They were tagged as residential, however, taken the width into consideration, path should be a better tagging. I corrected them
Best regards
Bienson (2023-07-18 18:33:19+00:00): Bitte mit dem Tagging vertraut machen. Der Name des Gebäudes ist nicht "im Bau". Ein im Bau befindliches Gebäude wird mit building=construction getaggt. Außerdem hast du die Adresse des nördlichen Hauses (Nr. 81) kopiert, die beim Neubau falsch ist.
Bei abgerissenen Gebäuden ist es besser, sie mit demolished:building=* zu taggen anstatt sie direkt zu löschen. So wird vermieden, dass ein anderer Mapper die Gebäude auf Luftbildern sieht und neu einträgt.
silversurfer83 (2023-07-18 19:19:45+00:00): Gude.
Um das Vertraut machen zu vereinfachen hier noch ein paar hilfreiche Links ins Wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Map_Features

Und bei Fragen einfach hier gucken:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contact_channels#Chats.2Fmessengers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138671059
Frans S (2023-07-19 07:21:45+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
You use the wrong tagging when you map highways. You only tagged the surface with tag footpath or some other tag. 
About tagging of highways
Please read and follow the tagging rules on this linked document.
Decision tree, which tag to be used for roads
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1S48CEVi3yiAYWhIJu57jtLyv0ZVUbGwJ/view?usp=share_link
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/East_Africa_Tagging_Guidelines
or
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa

--------------------------------------
Tag highway=Path rather than footway/	Paths are usually impassable for motorized vehicles. (However, African motorcyclists can sometimes do the most improbable stunts.)  Never use path to mark an unpaved or unsealed road in built-up residential areas: Such roads should be tagged according to the local conventions (usually highway=residential if passable by vehicles and pedestrians, or highway=footway for pedestrian only where they can sometimes be separated from another parallel highway for vehicles).
----------------------------
 How to measure the width of a road in IDeditor:
Zoom in as far as possible and draw a line between the shoulders of a trace and click
ctr +shift+M to shows measurements
click on the line between the nodes, and you get the width.
Best regards
TaraV (2023-07-19 11:03:08+00:00): Hi, in this changeset you've broken administrative boundary relations of China (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/270056) and Nepal (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/184633). I've fixed these (in changesets 138709869 and 138709424). For future editing, please make sure to check and not break any administrative boundary relations, especially not the ones related to countries. 
Thanks, Tara
Heinz_V (2023-07-19 17:22:43+00:00): Thanks for your work. The chinese border is still broken four times in the area of Taiwan.
ovruni (2023-07-20 06:37:39+00:00): Hola, le comunico que en OSM existen unas directrices para importación de datos https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Importaci%C3%B3n/Directrices . Además de directrices para las ediciones organizadas (varias cuentas editando de manera similar) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Directrices_de_edici%C3%B3n_organizada
Saludos
eggie (2023-07-18 15:56:21+00:00): Dag Ovide..
Goed om zaken actueel te maken.. maar... 
Waarom op al die wegen access=no getagd? Verboden Toegang.. Voor wie is dat verboden?
Op een trottoir of voetpad hoeft ook geen foot=yes

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-07-18 16:01:57+00:00): Ik heb access=no overal verwijderd .. bicycle=no en foot=yes idem..  Dat hoeft niet op een voetpad.
De rendering van de paden zal zo wel weer terugkomen. access=no zorgt ervoor dat je het pad nauwelijks ziet op de kaart. Je mag er toch niet komen. 
MVG
eggie
gscholz (2023-07-19 04:28:56+00:00): Hi matsumi,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=28.36106&lat=54.10841&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=138671880

I have reverted it to fix those issues.
Guido
eggie (2023-07-18 15:48:34+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
hdevine825 (2023-07-19 16:24:26+00:00): Thank you for making these edits! I've been meaning to work on this for a while, but I've been putting it off.
Unktneemo (2025-04-07 17:43:39+00:00): Please edit the changes that are still in planning with proposed:highway=*
Unktneemo (2025-04-07 17:44:34+00:00): highway:proposed * sorry.
arjunaraoc (2023-07-20 10:01:25+00:00): Changeset comments are not for promotion. No need of a relation, when there is only one member node. Error fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138755687
BrandenM (2023-07-18 14:35:18+00:00): test
silversurfer83 (2023-07-18 19:23:55+00:00): Gude :)
Die Postfiliale (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11053163424), wird die von dem Kiosk betrieben? Bin mir ziemlich sicher, dass es in DE praktisch keine einzige Filiale mehr gibt, die von DHL selbst betrieben wird. Daher haben wir hier ja das post_office=post_partner Schema (siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:post_office).

Grüße 
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138673006
wermak (2023-07-18 23:17:56+00:00): Habe es verbessert, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1042500824/history.
Schöne Grüße
silversurfer83 (2023-07-19 05:54:57+00:00): Danke dir :)
Bear-in-a-box (2023-10-13 12:42:55+00:00): Hello,
would you have any explanation for this? There is no hill anywhere near this roundabout?
Otherwise please revert.
thanks.
Thierry1030 (2023-10-13 16:06:40+00:00): I added it at the request of a note of mapper https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Jhowie_Nitnek.
I asked if the note can be retraced. I will come back to you
bxl-forever (2023-10-13 17:46:55+00:00): Here is the note, with a link to what this "peak" is about:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3739218
arjunaraoc (2023-07-20 09:52:58+00:00): highway=track usually means bicycles will have access in India. Can you elaborate why you set the access for bicycles to no?
ana_t7 (2023-07-21 04:37:53+00:00): Hi, 
   Thanks for highlighting this, I changed the attribute because as there are no evidences supporting for the vehicle or bicycle can travel through that way I made it as Bicycle=No. 
Thank you
mtmail (2023-07-28 08:01:54+00:00): Change reverted in #139122527 now.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-07-18 15:20:26+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/791368393

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-07-19 13:56:38+00:00): 4320 paneli x 330 W daje 1425 KW, nie MW

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=4320*330%2F1000&t=ffab&ia=calculator
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-07-19 14:00:52+00:00): o https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1190414699 chodzi
MxxCon (2023-07-18 15:57:10+00:00): Hello.
When mapping rectangular features, such as these courts or buildings,  you can press Q or right click on that feature and select "Make Square" to make it have right angles. That makes your mapping look neater and more accurate to the real world feature. 👍
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138674763
Paulish (2023-07-18 16:06:24+00:00): Thank you! I didn't know that before.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138674763
jptolosa (2023-08-03 05:37:36+00:00): Hola, todas las ciclovías agregadas ya estaban ingresadas en el mapa, así que las tuve que eliminar debido a duplicidad de datos.
Saludos.
felipeeugenio (2023-08-03 12:09:31+00:00): Hola
Además hay cruces peatonales que intersectan con la autopista e incluso el metro. Por favor cuidado con las ediciones.

te pedimos por favor incorporarte al chat de la comunidad en Telegram (app muy similar a whatsapp) en el link: https://t.me/OSMcl.

Ahí decenas de maperos conversamos todos los días y aclaramos dudas de quienes están comenzando.

saludos y nos vemos
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-12-19 08:28:29+00:00): http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=138675533 - tam jest fizyczne rozdzielenie między jezdniami, to akurat było OK, przy rondach mapowanie ich oddzielnie lepiej oddaje geometrie (inaczej niż przy pojedynczych wysepkach) a te wysepki to nie jest uuspokojenie ruchu...
olo81 (2023-12-19 19:04:41+00:00): Dla mnie to mapowanie pod render, ale jak widać, jestem w mniejszości. Dodatkowo wprowadza to niepotrzebne relacje.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-12-20 08:54:37+00:00): zawsze można przedyskutować to na szerszem międzynarodowym forum jak ktos ma ochotę na forum wątek założyć po angielsku
NorthCrab_upload (2023-07-18 15:40:15+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/919198664

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Russ McD (2024-08-03 08:42:21+00:00): Uncle Pip - I think you are completely wrong here.   I rode it last week and its a well surfaced tar road that connects through to the B4343.  I saw no signs indicating any form of private road.
Furthermore, OS data both current and in 2016 list this as the B4574 in the same format throughout its length.
Unless you can provide some compelling evidence as to why I am wrong, I will shortly revert it back.
You have joined OSM, edited the map once, and have not been seen again.  Perhaps this change has been made perhaps for personal reasons, to prevent vehicles using the road, and if so, that is not an acceptable practice.
Rgds, Russ
Uncle Pip (2024-08-03 10:38:04+00:00): I suggest you check the location again on street view in Google Earth. That section of road, and in particular the junction on the sharp bend on the B4574 is actually an EXIT road from the Hafod Estate, the entrance being a few yards back up the road. I have no idea why you would accuse me of having some ulterior motive for making the changes because I live nowhere near this road. I planned a route to ride on my motorcycle, only to arrive at this junction to find that i was being directed to turn right onto what was clearly NOT a road.
Russ McD (2024-08-03 11:07:22+00:00): Pip, 
OK  I'll retract the comment about an ulterior motive, although to join OSM and make just ONE edit ever, does seem strange.
But moving onto the road I simply don't get your explanation ... granted I rode East to West, so would not have seen any pertinent signs at the West end, and of course at the East end, yes there is a No entry on the gate to another private road that leads to the estate.  
Could it be you got the roads mixed up?
I have looked of street view and while I see signs marked Hafod Estate, there is nothing to indicate its a private road. There are even "official" brown tourist info signs pointing to the Picnic area.
Furthermore, an old streetview image at the junction with the B4343 does show this road signposted as the B4574 to Cwmystwyth/Rhayader.   I cant believe its since changed.
I too am a motorcyclist and I hate to see excellent road which appears to have been recently resurfaced, not correctly tagged, and perhaps not allowing others planning routes in the area to use it.
We can continue the debate, but I suggest you have may have confused this road with the Private one (showing as a track) that parallels it to the South, just under the path labeled "Coed Hafod Walk". 
Rgds. Russ
Baloo Uriza (2023-07-18 23:15:31+00:00): Welcome aboard!  Keep up the good work!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138675925
Himké (2023-08-03 17:05:56+00:00): Hi Astay22.

The number 347 is the endpoint of an address interpolation, which indicates the range of addresses along the way.
emersonveenstra (2023-07-18 16:25:26+00:00): Hi,

Why did you delete all of the service roads in the parking lots? Are they no longer there?
leoherzog (2023-07-18 16:56:34+00:00): Is a natural corridor that goes in between rows through a parking lot, but isn't marked or official, still considered a "service road"? I thought those roads were temporary holding places until the parking lot area boundaries were better defined.
emersonveenstra (2023-07-18 21:24:06+00:00): No, they always need to be there, otherwise how will routers know how to get in and out of the parking lot?
emersonveenstra (2023-07-18 16:26:46+00:00): Hi,

building:part areas can overlap building areas, that is what they are designed for. I'll revert this changeset for you, but please make sure you understand what each tag means before you delete things.
silversurfer83 (2023-07-18 19:33:03+00:00): Hallo und Herzlich wiillkommen bei OSM :)

hast du mehr infortmationen zu der Baustelle? Dauer? Ist die Brücke wirklich für alle Verkehrsteilnehmer gesperrt?

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138676984
Henning99 (2023-07-18 19:39:51+00:00): Hi, über die Dauer der Bauarbeiten habe keine genauen Information aber es soll ca 1 Jahr dauern aber ob sie solange kommt gesperrt ist ist unbekannt. Aktuell ist sie mit keinem Verkehrsmittel passier bar.
silversurfer83 (2023-07-18 19:46:55+00:00): Danke für die schnelle Rückmeldung :)

ich hab das mal eben angepasst
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138685235

Bei Fragen, immer raus damit

Grüße
silversurfer83
yasslay (2023-07-19 09:33:43+00:00): Thank you!
Komadinovic Vanja (2023-12-10 20:25:50+00:00): Hi Stadtigel,

It's me again :) I'm, as you can imagine, interested in changes of E4, section 11 ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14206054 ).

I saw you changed name. I'm using official Mountain Engineering Association ( PSS ) names for this section of E4 ( https://pss.rs/terenipp/krivelj-soko-banja/ ). You can also find more information on https://pss.rs/planinarski-objekti-i-tereni/tereni/?tip=evropski-pesacki-putevi-u-srbiji . Would you be ok with me changing names back to original ones?

I saw you added wiki I created about mapping E paths in Serbia under url tag, is it ok to change it to note tag? Also, do you thing it would be good idea to add it to other sections of E paths in Serbia, is it useful?

I saw you changed geometry also, probably based on your recent visit. I'm intereseted in removed paths around Ilino village ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14206054#map=15/43.7933/21.9547 ) Does that mean that you were unable to navigate there? I would like to contact club that should be maintaining that section and would appreciate more information? Around what time you visited region?

Thanks in advance,
Vanja
Stadtigel (2023-12-13 06:23:44+00:00): Hallo Vanja!

Thank you for your Mail! I will try to answer your questions:
1. Change name of E4, section 11:
The published PSS-GPX-File only goes from Lazarev kanjon to Sokobanja. The section from Krivelj to Lazarev kanjon is missing. That was the reason for my change. I think it is misleading if the name differs from the content. Using the bracket makes it easier to understand that the section is incomplete.
2. Change wiki-link from "url tag" to "note tag":
Selected applications allow you to click on url-tags to display the page in the browser. This doesn't work for note-tags. This was the reason for me using the "url tag".
Besides that: Editing is easier when the information doesn't have to be updated in multiple places.
If the information is only available in one place, a link from other sites is sufficient.
3. Add wiki-link to other sections:
I think, it is useful to add a wiki-link also to other sections of E paths in Serbia.
4. Removed path around Ilino village:
I hiked this trail on May 20nd this year (http://stadtigel.bplaced.de/GPS/gps.htm?GPX=2023-05-17bis06-03_E4_Serbien.gpx). The path behind Ilino (from published PSS-GPX-File) did not exist because of the lush vegetation. The actually marked path goes to Garnavica (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15978884). 
It is possible that the path continue behind the Garnavica, but this path was too difficult for me. Instead I followed the road to Rtanj village. I would appreciate it if you contacted the local club about this.

With friendly greetings
Stadtigel from Germany
Komadinovic Vanja (2023-12-16 20:49:16+00:00): Hi Stadtigel,

Once more thank you for you detailed response and insights provided.

Name of relation is official name, created by Mountaineering association of Serbia ( PSS ) when sections for E4 were defined, and those names are reported to ERA. I will double check with clubs if start of section is missing or it will be covered by E4-10 ( https://pss.rs/terenipp/vratna-krivelj/ ) and mark complete = no if that's case. But if you do not object I would change name back since this is official name.

Regarding using url, I know that it's sometimes more useful but that's one of OSM rules, do not map for render. Description of url tag ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:url ) clearly defines usage and we have website tag set with official PSS website. Note tag ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:note ) on the other hand is exactly what wiki is describing. If you do not object I would change tag from url to note.

Regarding problematic part around Ilino village, I will open internal dispute with your feedback and open OSM note.

Best,
Vanja
Komadinovic Vanja (2023-12-16 21:19:54+00:00): Note for tracking problematic part of path near Ilino:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4030903
Stadtigel (2023-12-18 15:48:39+00:00): Hallo Vanja!

Thank you for your information. But I would like to note, that
the documentation of the url-tag state: "This tag is being used for very different types of content - ... or even documentation on the OSM wiki" (look https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:url). That means: It is not false using url-tag.

With friendly greetings
Stadtigel from Germany
Komadinovic Vanja (2023-12-19 21:52:34+00:00): Hi Stadtigel,

I was more attracted with next sentence from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:url:
"So it is advised not to use this tag when more specific alternatives are available such as website=* ..." and we have website tag but for now I'm ok with leaving link to wiki in url instead of note. Later we can change that if needed.

Once more thanks for feedback and time spent on this discussion.

Best,
Vanja
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-11 23:40:50+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15151
Lynn Grantz (2024-01-18 00:25:03+00:00): Cool
trigpoint (2023-08-19 19:21:25+00:00): Personal note, reverted
dónal (2023-08-06 13:09:33+00:00): thanks for updating the speed limit information! #roadsafety
gpserror (2023-07-18 17:54:03+00:00): I don't think this is a valid reason - there's a chance for death while attempting any crossing wherever it may be.
gpserror (2023-07-18 18:01:40+00:00): If someone was walking along the north west side of memorial avenue is the expectation to trespass in the school to avoid a "ensured death" unmarked intersection? Please respond.
partytax (2023-07-18 18:31:27+00:00): To be honest, the expectation is that you drive a car everywhere. The sidewalk network in this area is thrown together haphazardly and has very poor connectivity. As a resident and regular user of the sidewalks in this area, I believe it would be unwise to map this crossing.

Here's a bit from the crossing=unmarked page in the wiki:
"Some states have laws that establish an implied crossing on every side of every intersection by default[1] or wherever one is implied by a sidewalk flanking the intersection,[2] unless otherwise prohibited by a regulatory sign. This can technically result in very unsafe crossings that most people would not recognize as crossings, such as across a busy four-lane road without any pedestrian infrastructure. It would be reasonable to omit such crossings in favor of safer ones. "

I'll take a video of the "crossing" later and link you if you like.
gpserror (2023-07-18 21:00:39+00:00): However this is a 2 lane entrance to a school of which people should be watching for kids and hence adults who would be trespassing the school which is more of problem for school security.  So i still think, unless there's a no pedestrians sign which I highly doubt, that this SHOULD be added for routing purposes.