piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
sundew (2023-12-20 21:51:03+00:00): Nein, ich glaube, die ref = "Kolonie Hünzingen" gehört an einen anderen Briefkasten, nicht an diesen. Ich werde diesen bisher nicht in OSM eingetragenen Briefkasten suchen fahren und dann hier ggf. nochmal nachbessern.

(Also habe ich wohl auf Distanz, Bauabsperrungen davor, was falsches abgelesen/notiert was aber evtl. am Ende doch inhaltlich richtig ist. Schaun wir mal ..)

Normalerweise wenn ein Briefkastenschild vertauscht ist, was an manchen Regionen krass oft vorkommt, schreibe ich das richtige ref dran, falls irgendwie erschließbar, und die falsche ref-Adresse in einen note=* ..

LG, sundew
OSM_RogerWilco (2023-12-20 21:55:20+00:00): Naja, aber wir erfassen nach OTG was vor Ort dran steht. Warum glaubst Du, dass die Beschriftung falsch ist?
sundew (2023-12-21 10:25:48+00:00): Hallo Roger,

prinzipiell hast du vollkommen Recht mit OTG. Allerdings erlebe ich es ständig, dass Briefkastenschilder zwischen benachbarten Orten vertauscht sind, die ref-Adresse existiert nicht im Ort, dafür im Nachbarort und umgekehrt (oder mehrere Briefkästen reihum). Es gab sogar mal jahrelang an der Straße nördlich von Bendestorf drei Postkästen mit identischem Schild/identischer ref-Adresse. Somit ist mein Vertrauen zur Richtigkeit erstmal per se eingeschränkt. Wenn ein solcher Fehler also offentsichtlich ist, korrigiere ich die Vertauschung und vermerke das im note-Tag. Ich glaube, das erfüllt die OTG-Regel trotzdem, weil ja aus anderen OTG-erfassten Daten abgeleitet.
In dem jetzt hier besprochenen Fall hatte ich erfahren, dass wohl noch ein Briefkasten irgendwo dort in der Gegend um den Ortsteil "Kolonie Hünzingen" fehlen soll, also werde ich diesen auf meiner zeitnah nächsten Tour durch diese Orte suchen. Und genau auf diesen fehlenden Kasten würde die vermeintlich falsche ref-Adresse nun besser passen. 
Da ich mir - wie geschrieben - baustellenbedingt auf Distanz eingebildet hatte, eine andere ref-Adresse gelesen zu haben und selbst der Erfasser dieses Tags bzw. zuvor letzte Änderer war, sowie der Meinung war, dass nun alles richtig sei, sah ich hier keine Notwendigkeit für einen note, sondern hab es einfach nach bestem Gewissen angepasst ..

LG
sundew
sundew (2023-12-28 10:19:37+00:00): Hallo Roger,

ich habe jetzt den fehlenden Briefkasten im Ortsteil Kolonie Hünzingen gesucht und eingetragen. Und tatsächlich hat auch dieser ein vertauschtes Briefkastenschild "Forellenhof, 29699 Hünzingen-Dorf". Nun haben wir allerdings das Problem zu wissen, dass beide Briefkästen nicht nur vertauschte, sondern auch noch veraltete Schilder tragen. Das entspricht zwar der OTG-Regel, ist aber nicht mehr korrekt. Denn mittlerweile haben die meisten Briefkästen der gesamten Region Walsrode statt dem jeweiligen Dorfnamen den Ortsbezeichner "Walsrode" und ich gehe davon, dass dies auch hier zutreffen müsste.
Naja egal, nicht zu ändern, ich habe den ursprünglichen Briefkasten auch angepasst und kommentiert.

LG und einen guten Rutsch,
sundew
felipeeugenio (2023-10-20 19:23:53+00:00): Hola Camilo
Con qué fuente hiciste estas ediciones? Hace tan solo unos meses hubo una controversia respecto de esta calle y es por eso que aparecía con los tags name:right y name:left. por que según el SII y otros maperos que han investigado, tiene nombres distintos según la comuna.
Saludos
Camilo Nuñez Castro (2023-10-20 19:57:33+00:00): Hola Felipe.
La calle Coronel es solo por el sector de La Granja, es decir, desde Manuel Rodríguez / Trinidad hasta el límite administrativo de La Granja que es Santo Tomás.
Desde el sur de santo tomás vereda sur corresponde a La Pintana y todo la extensión por La Florida y La Pintana se llama Bahía Catalina.

Fuente? Presencial, paso 1 vez a la semana por ese eje.

Lo mismo ocurre en el eje Trinidad.
Desde Isla Adelaida al poniente por la vereda norte se llama Manuel Rodríguez (La Granja) y por la vereda sur se llama Trinidad (La Florida). Esa diferenciación left / right es desde Coronel/ Bahía Catalina hasta Isla Adelaida / Punta Arenas, posteriormente al oriente se llama Trinidad por qué corresponde a La Florida.
jptolosa (2023-10-20 19:57:42+00:00): Hubo un malentendido la vez anterior, sólo se llama Coronel desde el lado de La Granja. Por el lado de La Florida y de La Pintana (hacia el sur de Santo Tomás) se llama Bahía Catalina.
Controversia resuelta.
felipeeugenio (2023-10-20 20:08:09+00:00): Buena. Gracias a ambos
SomeoneElse (2023-10-19 22:24:00+00:00): You are not "adding information".  You have removed lots of names.
GinaroZ (2023-10-20 11:56:23+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM. These two roads were already marked as oneway:psv=no to indicate they are two way for buses. Are they also two way for cars?
iiBus (2023-10-20 16:12:04+00:00): Hi, thank you. Yes these roads are two ways for cars as well as buses.
iiBus (2023-10-20 16:16:02+00:00): Hello - correction: Sorry, only Hermiston Gait is two ways for both buses and cars. The Shore is one way for cars and two ways for buses, but I changed it as I was having issues with the map behaving as if buses were also one way only.
osmuser63783 (2024-08-05 07:58:35+00:00): Hi, which map specifically was behaving as if buses were also one way only? OpenStreetMap.org doesn't have bus routing. Asking because it might be an issue with the map/app (so could be useful to let the developers know)
osmuser63783 (2024-08-05 08:07:19+00:00): There are new bus lane controls here, northbound is bus and cycle only, 24/7, southbound is bus, cycle and taxi only from noon to 6am, according to the council. I'd like to map these once I get a chance to check in person
osmuser63783 (2024-08-12 16:26:19+00:00): I've mapped it now. Please let me know if you are having any issues - in that case, we should figure out if the fault lies with the data or the app you are using before editing the data
LockOnGuy (2023-10-22 19:48:24+00:00): Hello, may I know why did you delete name:ar from n4486255698 ?
ڕاستی (2023-10-23 00:07:09+00:00): This place does not have Arabic name. And for the source you will ask, it will be here after 5 days.
LockOnGuy (2023-10-23 06:57:53+00:00): You only deleted name:ar while kept name:en and name:ku      
      
This place issue papers and orders that can be issued in Arabic with the same name you removed. Therefore the name:ar you removed can be verified on the ground. So please restore it.    
Also most of the signs have Arabic here.     
Will you restore it or no?     
Regards.
ڕاستی (2023-10-23 23:41:45+00:00): Because since the office replaced they removed Arabic name, so now this place only has Kurdish and English names on the sign.
LockOnGuy (2023-10-23 23:45:15+00:00): Arabic name is still on papers and documents. And it’s also mentioned by the ministry of higher education with address and the name in Arabic..     
will you restore it or no?
ڕاستی (2023-10-24 12:33:32+00:00): I survey this place, then I made a change.
But what is your source that I am wrong.
ڕاستی (2023-10-24 22:44:02+00:00): And this is the source:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/11NwO2rOIonx21FeCkDulOhjIBicN3mqV/view
LockOnGuy (2023-10-28 16:34:10+00:00): I Just restored the name:ar you deleted, source: https://academics.su.edu.krd/public/profiles/mghadid.taha/acknowledge/acknowledge-1763-46207-1685538790-1.jpg      
Please do not remove name:ar  tags like this because this is vandalism.
pantufla (2024-06-27 09:55:53+00:00): Most of the changes if not all, don't come with great intention to add value to the data, such as name= "My House" and tag as a palace. Many others are very poor tagged and are hard to correct or make great use of.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153239561
Mingwei (2024-12-26 19:47:48+00:00): Looks good!
emersonveenstra (2023-10-20 13:09:23+00:00): Hi,

Are you sure this is an actual bike route? It looks more like a grouping of related paths, generally a bike route has one defined start and end point, and all the ways connect to each other
CurlingMan13 (2023-10-24 06:55:27+00:00): Looking at your changeset history, this does not appear to be a one-off.  Please leave more detailed changeset comments.  What did you change, and why?

You can read more about changeset comments here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
gurglypipe (2023-10-19 23:33:01+00:00): Why delete the power plant building? Was that an intentional change, or an accident?
charmaine_dalisay (2023-10-19 23:37:25+00:00): Oh no Im so sorry that was an accident!
charmaine_dalisay (2023-10-19 23:37:58+00:00): I can put it back for you if you would like.
gurglypipe (2023-10-19 23:57:05+00:00): Thanks for the fast reply! I’ve partially reverted your changes, so the building is restored (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142841180).
2GarinZmei (2023-10-20 06:16:19+00:00): А не смущает, что там вообще до этого автомобильная дорога железку пересекала? Пожалуйста без язв, я тоже могу.
 Поправил пешеходку.
tastrax (2023-10-20 05:40:36+00:00): Heaps more of this road is operated by Sustainable Timber Tasmania, not just the bit you have marked. Even parts of Roger River Road is STT.
Glassman (2023-10-20 20:50:02+00:00): #TIP: Often the imagery isn't aligned. You can adjust the offset using the background tab in the editor.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142840999
Glassman (2023-10-20 20:50:59+00:00): #TIP: square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142841142
chuckfinley71 (2023-10-20 14:04:27+00:00): What is the source of the name for this alley?
Randy Cooke (2023-10-20 19:42:46+00:00): Google Maps
chuckfinley71 (2023-10-20 20:54:15+00:00): Ah okay, thanks! Sadly Google Maps is not an authorized source[1] since they have a restrictive license. Since the City of Dallas [2] doesn't give alleys official names it is likely someone vandalized Google Maps. 


[1]: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google
[2]: https://www.dallasopendata.com/dataset/Alleys-City-of-Dallas/apw2-ygck
chuckfinley71 (2023-10-20 20:54:15+00:00): Ah okay, thanks! Sadly Google Maps is not an authorized source[1] since they have a restrictive license. Since the City of Dallas [2] doesn't give alleys official names it is likely someone vandalized Google Maps. 

[1]: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google
[2]: https://www.dallasopendata.com/dataset/Alleys-City-of-Dallas/apw2-ygck
chuckfinley71 (2023-10-20 20:55:47+00:00): Geez, sorry for the duplicate comments. I shouldn't have kept pressing the button when the site was running slow..
Nerungri 86 (2023-10-21 17:53:43+00:00): What happened?
SomeoneElse (2023-10-31 21:36:52+00:00): Essentially, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142842064 happened.  A user created an account made some changes and immediately deleted it, because there were unwilling to discuss their changes with the community.
ForestFurnace (2023-10-20 02:29:54+00:00): Centre County Public Parcel Viewer names the road as "Breon Alley".
Glassman (2023-10-20 20:53:42+00:00): landuse=farmland should only include the actual farmland. landuse=farmyard can be used for the other areas.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142843520
Glassman (2023-10-20 20:53:44+00:00): landuse=farmland should only include the actual farmland. landuse=farmyard can be used for the other areas.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142843520
Glassman (2023-10-20 20:53:48+00:00): landuse=farmland should only include the actual farmland. landuse=farmyard can be used for the other areas.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142843520
Glassman (2023-10-20 20:53:50+00:00): landuse=farmland should only include the actual farmland. landuse=farmyard can be used for the other areas.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142843520
Glassman (2023-10-20 20:53:54+00:00): landuse=farmland should only include the actual farmland. landuse=farmyard can be used for the other areas.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142843520
Glassman (2023-10-20 20:56:53+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142843587
Glassman (2023-10-20 20:57:47+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142843645
Glassman (2023-10-20 20:58:06+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142843705
Glassman (2023-10-20 20:58:23+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142843772
Glassman (2023-10-20 20:59:19+00:00): The building is much smaller than what you added. Can you review this edit?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142843803
user_5359 (2023-10-20 18:16:16+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1216956116, https://www.osm.org/way/1216956115. What is the mean of the tag Type=Parque? Please notice that lowercase key type is reserved for relation.
Glassman (2023-10-20 20:59:41+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142843843
Glassman (2023-10-20 20:59:54+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142843924
Glassman (2023-10-20 21:00:20+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142843958
emersonveenstra (2023-10-20 13:03:51+00:00): Hi,

Why did you add layer=-1 to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1210314340? covered=yes is enough to indicate that it goes underneath the building
Glassman (2023-10-20 21:02:43+00:00): Typically just the building is tagged as a fire_station. I usually use the tag building=fire_station. Can you review this edit?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142844083
angys (2023-11-09 15:45:46+00:00): How you trace all these buildings?
mataharimau (2023-11-14 09:00:08+00:00): I walk around the buildings and leave a GPS trail behind. I also take 5sec interval geotagged-360 pics, so when I upload into JOSM, there will be hundreds of 360pics of the area. From the pics, I can tell where each wall starts/stops. But its a lot of work.
angys (2023-11-14 13:21:42+00:00): Allright, thanks for your effort. For 360 pics it can also be uploaded at Mapillary so others can also be beneficial from that to validate / add more details for an area.
Udarian (2023-10-22 20:05:01+00:00): please stop removing the tagging of pedestrian areas, the "highway=pedestrian" specifies that this is a pedestrian area. see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=pedestrian for more information, this tagging schema is approved so there is no reason to remove the tagging.
Sangro (2023-10-23 12:42:41+00:00): Hi Udarian, Thank you for feedback and retaining the data back to the previous version. I will review other change sets as per your suggestion.
aharvey (2025-01-15 10:16:46+00:00): Shouldn't name:en=Bennelong Point ? Otherwise we can't distinguish the different parts of the dual name?

I was then going to update name:etymology to name:en:etymology so the tagged etymology correctly relates to the right name between the two dual names.

I was planning on going through the GNR Dual Names to update in OSM but realised we don't actually have a documented consensus about how to handle them.
TheSwavu (2025-01-15 21:05:25+00:00): name:en is the name that should be rendered for an English speaking audience. Australia is predominately an English speaking country, as a result the value of name and name:en should be the same. If you don't think 
Bennelong Point / Dubbagullee is the most common name in English for this POI then it should not be in the name tag.
vng_me (2023-10-22 13:56:20+00:00): This is a river and coastlines shouldn't be here. Please, read carefully about OSM coastlines and use JOSM to draw and validate them.
houserca (2023-10-22 16:45:21+00:00): Deleted. And per discussion with others, I've deleted the other similar coastline ways I've created on rivers in the area.

This coastline existed previously, which made my additions seem appropriate:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/461982097

Should these coastlines be removed out to the larger (Hudson) river?
vng_me (2023-10-22 16:53:00+00:00): All coastline should be connected. I did quick check and looks like 461982097 also not connected.

Coastlines in OSM is how we define ocean-land border. Rivers are drawn in other way. Probably, there are some exceptions.
Glassman (2023-10-20 21:06:46+00:00): FYI - There is an app, StreetComplete, that makes adding surfaces to streets much easier. I know it's available for android, but I also think it available for iOS
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142848724
mavl (2023-10-20 06:48:01+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок изменил статус населённого пункта с town на village. В OpenStreetMap Викулово именно town, потому что районный центр, хотя и село. Этот пакет правок отменён.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:place
Kai Johnson (2023-11-01 13:49:03+00:00): Hi again! Looks like we lost Faaite Atoll in this changeset when the tags were deleted from way/138480699. We should figure out how to restore that.
MxxCon (2023-10-20 19:32:51+00:00): Hello.
Could you please explain why did you move a tree to what appears to be a warehouse?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142849731
houserca (2023-10-22 04:13:40+00:00): Unintentional. The tree appears to have already been removed.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-29 00:41:55+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143289740
arjunaraoc (2024-01-08 14:27:08+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).

Check my update: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146031170
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142850450
Xvtn (2023-12-14 15:34:19+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! This looks great, no complaints from me. Thanks for your contributions!
ovruni (2023-10-20 07:16:15+00:00): Hola Alejandra Sofía Mantilla, en este conjunto de cambios se ha agregado etiquetas superficie sin otro etiqueta que indique el tipo de via, lo mismo para la etiqueta garden:type, por lo que he revertido los conjuntos de cambios.
Saludos
superkiria (2023-10-20 19:32:56+00:00): Привет!
Такие дорожки в лесу это highway=path, по-русски в поиске "Тропа". + я добавил ещё троп по спутнику.
2GarinZmei (2023-10-21 11:26:28+00:00): Привет, ок, спасибо
aTarom (2023-10-20 07:56:16+00:00): Hola, disculpa brevedad, mira
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:est_height
para
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11276615084/history
Saludos
pantufla (2023-10-20 08:43:41+00:00): Ahh mira, no sabía, muchas gracias. Voy a editar estos cambios con esa sugerencia y la usaré a partir de ahora. Saludos.
aTarom (2023-10-20 08:47:40+00:00): Gracias a ti por comunicarte y facilitar la buena salud de la BD :)
arjunaraoc (2024-01-08 14:25:54+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).

Check my update:https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146031170
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142852455
Andrey_91177 (2023-10-20 13:32:17+00:00): I wish you success...
This platform not for this comments bild!
Have a great day.
SomeoneElse (2023-10-20 14:12:43+00:00): I've hidden political comments by a blocked user (that Andrey_91177 replied to) above.
osmviborg (2023-10-20 06:50:20+00:00): Området hedder 'Sønæs Friareal'. Undlad venligst at slette navnet.
AlexSpritze (2023-11-18 18:29:55+00:00): This way is used as an area. I don't think we should leave it as it is.
Flamen_Sru (2023-11-21 06:36:59+00:00): Hi  AlexSpritze
Thanks for the feedback. I've added back the area:highway=footway tag.
aTarom (2023-10-20 07:48:03+00:00): Hola, cabriña, welcome a OSM, retiro el mensaje de hola y el tag "rhbdhnfgn" en el elemento:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11276668460/history
Si quieres puedes acercarte a los grupos de la comunidad, donde te podemos ayudar con las ediciones
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/es/51
cualquier duda ya sabes :)
Saludos y feliz mapeo
Denis_Helfer (2025-07-12 10:09:08+00:00): Bonjour,

Ceci n'est pas une traversée autorisée : il n'y a aucun équipement de sécurité ni avertissement d'aucune sorte. C'est plus que  délicat de la maintenir dans la base laissant les calculateur d'itinéraire emprunter cette voie. 
De plus, je ne suis pas sûr que le chemin soit carrossable.
Carto'Cité (2025-07-21 12:39:32+00:00): Bonjour Denis,
Oui je comprends, tu serais favorable à la supprimer ?
C'est moi (Charles), qui l'avais ajouté suite à une sortie vélo. Je suis d'accord que ce n'est pas particulièrement carrossable comme traversé, j'avais conservé la description en track mais elle n'est pas justifiée. La heatmap Strava montre que cette « traversée » est régulièrement utilisée.
Charles de Carto’Cité
Denis_Helfer (2025-09-04 12:09:17+00:00): Bonjour Charles,

Oui je serai d'avis de ne pas mettre dans OSM des possibilités d'itinéraires qui sont contraires au lois. En l'occurrence l'utilisation illicite du domaine ferroviaire.
On sera citoyen en laissant une note sur le "pseudo" passage à niveau en rappelant les règles : https://www.sncf-reseau.com/fr/securite-ferroviaire/la-prevention-des-comportements-risques-sur-le-reseau-ferre
joost schouppe (2025-03-07 14:32:48+00:00): Staat hier een straatnaambordje? In de officiële kaarten is hier straat met een naam.
Filip009 (2023-10-25 07:09:55+00:00): Dobrý deň, to, že sa jedná o vyhliadkový bod ste nemusel dávať aj do mena. Tým, že ste vybral, že je to vyhliadka, tak všetci vedia, že je to vyhliadka, nemusíte to písať ešte aj do mena.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-15 12:58:42+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/44021295/history has roof_shape = gabled that was added in this edit
Maybe roof:shape=gabled was intended here?

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape
EBSerKartler (2025-06-09 16:05:13+00:00): Hello Mateusz,
of course you are right. I have just fixed this tag (not only for this building)
osmviborg (2023-10-20 07:50:31+00:00): Der er ikke noget unormalt i at at have et navngivet område indenfor et andet navngivet område. Det er tilfældet her. Lad være med at slette navnet.
osmviborg (2023-10-20 07:51:28+00:00): https://imgur.com/a/KxiJi4o
kortgodt (2023-10-20 08:05:00+00:00): Kilde?
osmviborg (2023-10-20 08:14:53+00:00): https://imgur.com/a/KxiJi4o