piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
nevw (2024-04-08 15:25:17+00:00): Hi, you are not formatting the opening hours correctly.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening%20hours?uselang=en
SF6unBE (2025-07-26 19:29:15+00:00): Die eingetragenen Baustellen gibt es aber noch gar nicht. Nur hinter dem Ebl wird ein DM gebaut.
Grinbert 🙂 (2025-07-26 19:33:58+00:00): Die Baustellenflächen wurden vor Jahren mal eingetragen. Ich hatte sie nur mal angepasst/verkleinert. Ich lösche sie mal.
Nicolas Charbonnier (2024-04-07 12:09:24+00:00): We should go together if you live around there =) 
I admit I mostly use Street Complete and its limited range of possible edition as far as it is quite representative of the reality
ottwiz (2024-04-22 19:29:58+00:00): Hey, it looks nice but as soon as I finish up mapping West Virginia, I'm gonna rework the forest land cover you drew because I checked from imagery and these don't align up as good as it should be ;)

As I can see for example you don't create inner cuts. Definitely working with JOSM would be a lot better for you, although it has a learning curve.
ottwiz (2024-04-22 19:30:38+00:00): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EmroWsKNZ_Q

This is my mapping technique
SekeRob (2024-04-07 13:52:22+00:00): Hi,

Given the battle over Russian-Ukraine name tagging, are you sure the name:uk here is in russian too?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/31517557/history

I had extreme strong doubts and this was just a random test since this popped into my mapping 'territory' so I did a second random pick and that one too gets name:uk in russian. 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/31491325

ciao
avinet_ua (2024-04-07 13:56:19+00:00): >are you sure the name:uk here is in russian too?

its not russian, but same letters w different pronounce

> so I did a second random pick and that one too gets name:uk in russian.

they are different, look closely
>> Либефельд
>> Лібефельд
SekeRob (2024-04-07 14:07:52+00:00): So taginfo says name:uk is used for A name in Ukrainian. You defenitely got me there

https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/name%3Auk#values

And I did put both before of one in an ASCII editor and it shows no difference on my computer.
avinet_ua (2024-04-07 14:10:38+00:00): yes, its for ukrainian, as I said - same letters, different pronounce for first example, second is different
avinet_ua (2024-04-07 14:12:27+00:00): found problem - there are 2 versions, changed to wikipedia variant, now its really different
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/31517557
thanks for notice
noelbov (2024-04-07 19:02:28+00:00): Hi, I have adjusted your change that interrupted rcn route 53-80
opendcc (2026-07-17 15:08:50+00:00): Du hast hier dem ganzen Wald einen Zaun verpasst - stimmt so nicht.
Svalbard (2024-04-08 17:49:53+00:00): Hallo joscheele, bitte den tag „name“ nicht für Beschreibungen nutzen. Zugangsbeschränkungen kann man über den „access“-tag ausdrücken, nicht über einen Namen. „Tennis-Übungswand“ ist auch eine Beschreibung und kein Name. Außerdem müsste man wohl auch eine „Wand“ in OSM erfassen, wenn denn der Name Programm ist. Wenn der Tennisverein gern eine individuelle Karte seines Geländes haben möchte, bietet sich vielleicht umap an. Dann muss man in OSM nicht den „name“-tag missbrauchen. Gruß Svalbard
mcliquid (2024-04-08 07:09:18+00:00): Dein Changeset-Kommentar ist leider abgeschnitten worden wegen Zeichenbegrenzung. Brauchst du hier "Unterstützun"? :)
itsbrody (2024-04-08 07:42:37+00:00): kurz gesagt - ja! Deshalb habe ich die Straße an der Stelle der Sperrung (FR Lindau) erst einmal nur aufgetrennt.
Die Sperre in Gegenrichtung wird an der offiziellen Ein-/Ausfahrt "B31/B12" liegen
mcliquid (2024-04-08 07:57:14+00:00): Ich schau es mir gerne später an. Hast du gerade eine Quelle für die Sperrung parat, damit wir die gleichen Daten verwenden? Danke dir.
itsbrody (2024-04-08 08:01:29+00:00): (Leider) nur offizielle Beschilderung an der Strecke, die aber schon eine ganze Weile da steht. Möglicherweise gibt es auch eine Baustellenankündigung im Netz.
itsbrody (2024-04-08 08:03:18+00:00): Ich habe sie mir deshalb gemerkt - weil ungewöhnlich, denn für die Durchführung muss der (Service)Weg zw. B31 und St2375 der mit einem Tor versperrt ist, geöffnet werden.
itsbrody (2024-04-08 08:04:36+00:00): Das Schild, auf das ich zuerst aufmerksam wurde steht @ 47.58092, 9.67486
itsbrody (2024-04-08 08:06:28+00:00): https://www.schwaebische.de/regional/lindau/lindau/vollsperrung-fahrbahn-der-b31-wird-in-teilen-erneuert-2403008
mcliquid (2024-04-08 08:20:36+00:00): Danke! Ich habe den betreffenden Streckenabschnitt vorab mit einer Conditional Restriction belegt, ab 17.06. folgt dann die Änderung zur Vollsperrung durch mich. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149723097
itsbrody (2024-04-08 09:02:33+00:00): Vielen Dank für die Hilfe/Umsetzung. Das Conditional auf der Straße wirkt vermutlich in beiden Richtungen. Warum ersetzt Du das dann noch durch die Vollsperrung?

Magst Du diesen Changeset dann auch hier posten?
Und -- machst Du die Strecke auch wieder auf?  :-)
mcliquid (2024-04-08 09:05:34+00:00): access:conditional wird leider nur von ganz wenigen Routing-Softwares unterstützt. Deshalb würde ich am 17.06. die Strecke auf "highway=construction" setzen und direkt am 07.07. wieder öffnen. Ich hab's mir im Kalender notiert :)
itsbrody (2024-04-08 09:36:51+00:00): Ich wollte ja mit dem "operational_status" arbeiten - hat der das gleiche Problem, dass er nicht genügend ausgewertet wird?
mcliquid (2024-04-08 09:54:43+00:00): Laut Wiki wird der Tag gar nicht ausgewertet und auch überhaupt nicht mehr empfohlen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:operational_status
itsbrody (2024-04-08 10:18:14+00:00): Wow - Du hast einen ziemlich guten Überblick. Hauptberuf(ung): OSM-Mapper-Berater :-)

also geht's Richtung "Lifecycle" eines Objektes!
Hast Du noch eine passende/gültige Quelle, deren Eintrag dann auch ausgewertet wird für den Datumsbereich einer Einschränkung?
mcliquid (2024-04-08 10:37:58+00:00): Berufung kommt gut hin ;) Eine Übersicht welche Software zumindest "access:conditional" auswertet findest du hier in der ersten Zeile: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Conditional_restrictions#Software_support
nevw (2024-04-07 21:15:35+00:00): Hi, regarding the addr tags…
addr:street should not be abbreviated and should not include the number therefore becomes…
addr:street=Ormond Boulevard.
addr:street = 12 Ormond Blvd implies that the street number of your address is 12 but you have addr:housenumber=2.
I expect it should be…
addr:housenumber =12
and addr:unit=2
nevw (2024-04-12 08:34:40+00:00): no response, fixed.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:24:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
santamariense (2024-04-07 17:50:45+00:00): Olá EduardaRafaela,

Bem-vinda ao OSM. Muito boa a sua edição. Apenas uma dica para ficar ainda melhor... 

Para deixar a geometria dos prédios no esquadro, seleciona eles e pressiona a tecla Q.

Bons mapamentos!
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2024-04-12 02:45:47+00:00): 还是那句话，在你删长滨路沿线的点的时候不要看到点就按Delete，比如你看WAY: 1086643435就因为你删掉了它最右侧和长滨路汇合的交点，它也被截断了
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149692663
happy5214 (2024-04-07 13:53:38+00:00): I accidentally hit Enter in the upload dialog instead of apostrophe (not for the first time). Sources are Bing and Esri World Imagery.
lakedistrict (2024-04-20 13:06:14+00:00): Hi, thanks for all the details you have recently added. Town names are usually, and more correctly,  mapped as nodes in the centre rather than on an outline (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place=town?uselang=en-GB). To keep the local mapping consistent, please can you add the Dumfries place=town node back? If you need help "undeleting" it (it's better to this rather than create a new node) please let me know. :)
П3тр0виЧъ (2024-04-07 14:48:51+00:00): Перед тем, как что-то «уточнять», стоит открыть вики.
dval (2024-04-08 15:46:14+00:00): Hi, Miu76! Интересно, а почему вы удалили track, а не заменили его на service? Снимки очень чётко показывают наличие дороги по гребню дамбы. Да и как иначе ее обслуживать, если не с помощью авто? По-моему, дорога здесь должна быть обозначена.
П3тр0виЧъ (2024-04-15 06:17:42+00:00): Правки по дамбе откачены.
Mir76 (2024-04-17 07:33:04+00:00): Во-первых, это в первую очередь дамба (waterway=dam). И только во вторую дорога (если на нее вообще пускают кататься всяких левых, я бы не пускал).
П3тр0виЧъ (2024-04-17 07:37:53+00:00): Во-первых, это в первую очередь НЕ дамба (waterway=dam).
Где катаются, отмечено, где перегорожено тоже.
Mir76 (2024-04-17 08:26:38+00:00): А что же это в первую очередь? Не много ли чести просто проселочной дороге стоить миллиарды?
BCNorwich (2024-04-09 07:10:00+00:00): Hi, I've removed the footway from on top of the service road, (duplicate highway), and amended the tags so the service road is also the PRoW footpath.
amcclements (2024-04-10 10:56:36+00:00): Thanks, I'll try to be more careful..
ma-rt-in (2024-05-26 19:59:21+00:00): Hey,
die Fachklinik ist kein Krankenhaus.
Habs bereits entfernt.

vg
G4rden3r (2024-05-26 20:03:27+00:00): Moin, 
Ich hatte mich hier an das Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:healthcare=rehabilitation?uselang=de) gehalten, sehe es aber auch kritisch, da ich den healthcare-tag für besser halte als amenity 
vg
habi (2024-04-08 15:21:20+00:00): Ciao Taktaal
Ich war gestern gerade dort, das Mühlispiel und der Pingpongtisch sind nicht mehr da, es hat jetzt ein ziemlich grosses `sport=padel`-Feld da.
Ich habe aber aufm Handy nicht geschafft, die Berner Luftfotos von 2023 anzuzeigen.
Deshalb habe ich https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4187045#c9150768 gemacht.
Gruss, Habi
habi (2024-04-08 21:01:18+00:00): Ich hab' beides mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149752061, da hinter dem Padel-Feld auf den Orthofotos von 2023 nix zu erkennen ist.
Cube5518 (2024-04-07 14:52:38+00:00): Update Thorpe Park
BCNorwich (2024-04-08 06:43:39+00:00): Hi, I think there is more track to Way: Flying Fish (700274555). Also the track needs to be sectioned up and layer tags added.

Regards Bernard.
Metzor (2024-04-07 17:53:59+00:00): Hi Kurt,

Your OsmAnd data seems to be outdated. The Poi "Obst- und Gartenbauverein"alredy existed since Sept. 2023 in OSM:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11225891839/history

Best regards
Metzor

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149704107
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-13 10:24:37+00:00): Thank you for mapping. The mapping looks great and also the changeset comment. Happy Mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149696335
Strubbl (2024-04-08 18:44:55+00:00): Hi Emil, kannst du bitte das maxspeed=7 Tag wieder entfernen? Das ist bereits durch highway=living_street impliziert, siehe Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway=living%20street?uselang=de#Verwendung_in_Deutschland
hauke-stieler (2024-05-23 18:56:48+00:00): Hi,

eine Anmerkung zu deinen Änderungen an https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1151943715/history/3 : Das mit dem cycleway-tags war vollkommen richtig, aber das Entfernen der footway-tags (also highway=footway und footway=sidewalk) ist problematisch, weil das bspw. für Routing-Engines wichtige Informationen sind. Das ist hier ja schließlich kein Wald- und Wiesenpfad, sondern ein breiter Bürgersteig, der zum Holstenplatz gehört. Die Tags sind an solchen Wegen durchaus korrekt.

Grüße
Hauke
G4rden3r (2024-05-25 15:19:14+00:00): Moin,

danke für den Hinweis, hier hätte ich den way als footway lassen können.

Gruß
G4rden3r
derloris (2024-04-27 01:29:56+00:00): Hallo, vielen Dank fürs Erkunden und Einzeichnen. Ich frag nur, weil es diesbezüglich manchmal Missverständnisse gibt: Ist auch explizit ausgeschildert, dass das Betreten verboten ist? Denn wenn z.B. nur ein "Privatstraße"-Schild hängt, gilt das nur für Fahrzeuge und das Gehen wäre weiterhin möglich - für OpenStreetMap wäre dann vehicle=private statt access=private das passende. LG
derloris (2024-04-27 01:31:55+00:00): PS. Sorry, hab den Link vergessen. Es geht um diesen Verbindungsweg in Leitring: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1270648455
psio (2024-05-08 09:49:43+00:00): Danke für die Nachfrage. Ja, ist verifiziert, Betreten ausdrücklich verboten
derloris (2024-05-08 16:13:26+00:00): Alles klar, danke!
NorthCrab_upload (2024-04-07 15:30:24+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11799906762

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Tjuro (2024-04-07 19:32:32+00:00): beste MacK001,

Gebouwen en addressen worden geimporteerd vanuit het kadaster,
Gelieve deze niet te verplaatsen.
Ik heb de gebouwen geherimporteerd.
VLD549 (2024-05-23 06:52:24+00:00): Hi Tom, I'm trying to verify the name change to Buurtweg 3 - Kleine Klepperstraat, but I can't find sources. Would you be able to provide a link to a site that confirms the name? 
Thank you in advance!
Tom Ameye (2024-05-23 07:19:55+00:00): It can be found as the name in the GRB layer.
In the Atlas der Buurtwegen it is called Klepperstraat. https://docs.vl-brabant.be/gisdata/abw/BRU/atlas/gebruik/tabel/BRU_T_009-020.jpg
VLD549 (2024-06-25 12:44:36+00:00): Ok.
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-18 01:22:50+00:00): Thank you for mapping. The mapping looks great and also the changeset comment. Happy Mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149698371
Tjuro (2024-04-07 19:35:59+00:00): beste MacK001,

Ik heb deze changeset even terug gedraaid. de node:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2846674971
was verschoven, en je had een oprit verwijderd.
Tjuro (2024-04-07 19:39:50+00:00): beste MacK001,

ik zie hier dat je node:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2846676791
verplaast hebt. 

Heeft dat een reden of is dat perongeluk gegaan?

Met vriendelijke groet,

Tjuro
MacK001 (2024-04-07 19:50:05+00:00): Dat is dus perongeluk gegaan.
pitscheplatsch (2024-04-08 14:44:22+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149738846
radiotrefoil (2025-06-11 08:02:04+00:00): Hi, thanks for your edits. I'm wondering what the source for way/1270653098 is as it does not appear on imagery and seems dubious.
Cheers
Endres Pelka (2024-04-08 18:40:15+00:00): Co w chaszczach robi kopia przystanku Grudziądz Tuszewo? https://www.osm.org/node/11799930209
kornad (2024-04-09 07:01:14+00:00): Ups, pomyłka. Dzięki za zwrócenie uwagi. Na szczęście już ktoś poprawił.
kornad (2024-04-09 07:01:24+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149750379
d_berger (2024-04-08 00:59:05+00:00): Änderungen ohne Quellenangaben sind nicht akzeptabel, genausowenig wie das verwenden veralteter Luftbilder, um Baustellen von 2021 als neu einzutragen.
Leo Slager (2024-04-07 16:19:44+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Jooxor (2024-04-07 15:57:57+00:00): À y regarder de plus près, j’avais raté la pizza vegan, modification à annuler.
silversurfer83 (2024-04-10 10:12:41+00:00): Hi :)

hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1270655173 hast du (wieder?) einen Acker mit Flurnamen belegt. Bitte die Flurnamen auf einen Punkt mit "place=locality" mappen. Ist im Edertal leider noch häufig so anzufinden, dass es auf der Fläche liegt, als Punkt ist aber besser. Danke :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149699239
berjk (2024-04-08 07:14:53+00:00): sieht so aus, dass Cafe Ihle nun doppelt von Dir eingezeichnet ist.
Gruß Jürgen / berjk
user_12500175 (2024-04-08 07:41:11+00:00): Hallo, jepp da war bei der Bäckerei noch ein amenity=cafe drinnen.

Danke dir, habs korrigiert
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-11 13:54:16+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/391211741/history has amenity = church that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What you meant by amenity=church? It seem to be not documented value and it seems to be a duplicate of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dplace_of_worship - if you meant christian church then then it is taggable by amenity=place_of_worship religion=christian.
wikimax (2024-04-11 16:11:32+00:00): Hi,
sorry, this was a mistake - I didn't want to change the amenity value but the building value to "church".
I just corrected my edit.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-11 16:23:13+00:00): Thanks for a quick fix!
jpennycook (2024-04-07 17:30:46+00:00): Hi!

I think you've misunderstood what "designated" means - it's more positive than yes, so setting motor_vehicle=designated when the signs forbid motor vehicles is strange.

Jon
jpennycook (2024-04-07 17:31:46+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Ddesignated
Altom (2024-04-07 18:24:11+00:00): Thanks for the response.
The council in the UK is responsible for setting out how roads are used, and they have set Pudding Lane as a "Byway open to all traffic" i.e it is specifically saying it is for any vehicle, however its not paved so not necessarily suitable.
I'll update to a "yes".
Altom (2024-04-13 15:27:06+00:00): Hi Jon

Again thanks for the feedback, but my re-reading of the Openstreet map link provided makes me think it should indeed be "designated", rather than "yes"

My reasoning;
The OpenStreet link re. designated says;
"designated ways are intended to be usable for the designated purpose(s). If real world usability does not match designation the ways should be still tagged as designated with additional tags such as for example smoothness=horrible to describe the real world (un)usability"

Pudding Lane is categorised by the local Council as a "Byway open to all traffic", reference for this is the Wokingham Council's interactive map, link here;
https://experience.arcgis.com/experience/693aa0ab35dd45e7ae8e256533d7dd2b/#data_s=id%3AdataSource_1-18b03eb066f-layer-133-18b03ea48fb-layer-126%3A21
(will need to zoom in)

The "Byway open to all traffic"  (aka BOAT) is defined as "A highway over which the public is entitled to travel on foot, horseback or pedal cycle and by wheeled vehicles of all kinds, including mechanically propelled vehicles, but which is used by the public mainly for walking or for riding"

The "mechanically propelled vehicles" part of the BOAT definittion makes me see this as motor_vehicle=designated.

Even though Pudding Lane is likly impassible for four wheel vehicles due to their width, but they are specifically entitled to use it. So real world use does not match the Councils descritpion. So an additional tag of smoothness=veri_horrible seems about right.

I hope you'll consider my above proposal and clarify for me if its not aceptable.

Thank you in advnace
Al
jpennycook (2024-04-14 10:40:21+00:00): The last time I used Pudding Lane, there were bollards to prevent through motor traffic, and I assume there was a TRO to cover this. If this is no longer the case, go ahead. Don't downgrade non-motor access from designated to yes though.
Scout Jens (2024-08-12 09:40:14+00:00): Ein Gebäude ist es aber sicher. Du hast Building=appartements gelöscht. Ich ergänze das wieder.
JJIglesias (2024-04-07 19:30:20+00:00): Gracias por tus ediciones en la zona de Santiago de Andamarca y alrededores. Hace una semana estuve en esa zona precisamente.

Un detalle sobre el uso del Tag=Embankment (Terraplen)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:embankment

Saludos
JJIglesias (2024-04-07 19:33:58+00:00): Seria genial si pudieras agregar los Nodos de la Farmacia, la Gomería o Llantería, Taller Mecánico y donde vendan combustible en Bidon. Si es que hay tales elementos en Andamarca
AntMadeira (2024-04-08 16:56:53+00:00): Olá, novamente.
Nestas turbinas do Reguengo do Fetal, o número não deveria ir para ref=*?
É que pôr números no campo do nome não me parece o mais apropriado...

Cumprimentos,
António Madeira.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149701564
meioserrano (2024-04-08 17:16:39+00:00): Eu estava a fazer assim.. mas de pois reparei que vários já estavam "nomeados", e reverti o que estava a fazer não foram muitos. Como não tenho experiência nisto dos parques eólicos não quis ir alterar os outros.
Mas com tempo posso lá voltar e rever
Nota: tenho dúvida da utilização da área "parque eólico", porque a usar-se implica dizer que toda a área é "parque", quando  não o é apenas os locais dos equipamentos e acessos. Daí que não coloquei essa área (talvez seja para offshore)
Cumprimentos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149701564
AntMadeira (2024-04-08 21:23:40+00:00): Para mim, é o que faz sentido, pois um número não é um nome.
Não percebi a parte do parque eólico. Se reparares, as turbinas estão incluídas em duas relações, uma relativa ao parque e outra relativa ao subparque. Não é uma área, mas um conjunto de pontos.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14047196
meioserrano (2024-04-13 21:40:34+00:00): Entretanto estive a pensar e aqueles números de facto são a identificação das torres (isto vendo no plano de instalação / estudo impacte ambiental), só não sei se essa numeração está colocada em cada torre.. como não fui eu que coloquei estas tags, não vou mexer.
Sobre o parque eólico, existe o elemento de área "parque Eólico", no iD , msa julgo que nestes casos não é aplicável
AntMadeira (2024-04-14 16:13:21+00:00): Eu acho que isso é um erro do iD, e terei de averiguar. Pela wiki, um parque eólico em terra deve ser mapeado como uma relação, tal como está neste exemplo. Criar uma área não faz realmente nenhum sentido. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:power%3Dplant#Onshore_wind
Se tiver mais novidades, comunicarei, mas também podes (e deves) pôr esta e outras dúvidas no canal Telegram.

Abraço,
António.
santamariense (2024-04-07 17:42:23+00:00): Olá willian miguel,

Estive revisando sua edição. Parece estar ok.

Dica: É possível gravar as trilhas que você fizer e subir o GPX para o OSM. Qualquer dúvida, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Canais_para_contato , especialmente os canais de Telegram pela sua dinamicidade.

Bons mapeamentos!
ivanbranco (2024-04-07 20:24:04+00:00): What's the source of these edits? It doesn't seem like they are survey and local knowledge as stated in the changeset metadata.

Also, let's take an example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4690647982
This cafe is called "Bar Mary" and you added the ukrainian name "Слов'янський", which Google translates as "Slavic". What's the meaning of this edit?

Here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14143259
"Isola delle femmine" has the ukrainian name "Ізола-делле-Фемміне", which doesn't seem ukrainian at all, just the same italian name written in cyrillic ecc.ecc.
ivanbranco (2024-04-07 20:28:19+00:00): Seems like you are just "translating" russian names to ukrainian names without any kind of check?
In such case could you discuss these kind of edits with the Italian community (as per guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct)?
avinet_ua (2024-04-07 20:35:09+00:00): this manual edits, yes, partially translated from ru locale.

>  which doesn't seem ukrainian at all
Im better know what translation is.

and slowdown cowboy with your tone
avinet_ua (2024-04-07 20:38:00+00:00): > What's the source of these edits?
my own translation
>  It doesn't seem like they are survey and local knowledge as stated in the changeset metadata.
translated by me

> just the same italian name written in cyrillic ecc.ecc.
Go to school and learn how to write own names
avinet_ua (2024-04-07 20:39:16+00:00): about bar Mary - fixed, thanks for notice