piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NorthCrab_upload (2024-10-13 22:41:00+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12249169948

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2024-10-13 22:40:58+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12249157642

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
TranslatorPS (2024-10-18 17:28:39+00:00): Co mogłem to wokół Strumienia dopisałem 15kV, bo akurat miałem na to pod ręką jakieś "kwity" z oddziału bielskiego, ale przyznam, że sam jestem ciekaw co się dzieje dalej w kierunku Wisły Małej i Wielkiej... Tamta granica pomiędzy oddziałami (a co za tym idzie, napięciami) stała się właśnie co najmniej ciekawa.
morsiu (2024-10-18 19:31:04+00:00): Owszem, ta granica też dla mnie nie jest jasna. Pewnie gdzieś są fikcyjne połączenia między słupami, ale trudno to zweryfikować bez ortofoto wysokiej rozdzielczości, z drugiej strony trochę by tego musiało być. Może problem leży gdzie indziej, ale nie znam się na tym aż tak żeby coś jeszcze do sprawdzenia wymyślić.

Na razie doszukałem się ogólnych informacji nt. napięcia zasilania poszczególnych gmin z planów zaopatrzenia w energię jak i miejscowych planów zagospodarowania. Jakoś z grubsza wyznacza to gdzie te granice miały by być, choć tylko na tyle na ile pewne są te wzmianki.

Jeszcze ciekawostka, która może ma tutaj znaczenie, może nie. Otóż z GPZ Goczałkowice w stronę Łąki i Wiseł linia SN (południowa) ma 5 przewodów. Potem się to rozchodzi na 4, i ostatecznie na 3. Nie wiem na razie o co w tym chodzi.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-17 03:18:57+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165052097
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-04 21:24:11+00:00): Hello!

You used
building=office_building
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1097037173/history

Have you maybe meant
building=office
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
UrbanUnPlanner (2026-02-05 04:31:59+00:00): From what I can tell, it's what Rapid puts in building= for its 'Office Building" preset, so if you want it to be different, poke bhousel :)
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-24 23:16:02+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10073014/history

this one had no disused:type=route_master

is it intentional that it was also changed?
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-05-23 08:38:55+00:00): according to my check this route exists and change was invalid
SomeoneElse (2024-11-21 10:01:51+00:00): Hello again LockOnGuy,
You've used "updated name " as a changeset comment here.  This isn't good enough - you should explain what source you used and what changes were actually made to names.
In addition, someone has provided the DWG with https://ibb.co/kydcgQH , which claims to show the Kurdish name used as the main / only name here.  Do you have any comment on that?
Best Regards,
Andy, from OSM's Data Working Group
LockOnGuy (2024-11-21 10:27:05+00:00): Hello, SomeoneElse,   
  
Have you seen the history?   https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/332658571/history  
It was initially added with an Arabic name, but in changeset 127308649, it was changed, and the changeset comment was only "set of edits." I don't see your comment there asking for a source or suggesting a better changeset comment.  
  
The source used was an eye survey, as I saw the sign in Arabic when I was there. The signs frequently change with each new mayor, on top of other factors like furnishings, etc.  
  
Currently, the mayor is Sahir Ali Jasim, who is Arab, and in his office, there is a nameplate on his desk written exclusively in Arabic. It states his name and job title as follows:  
  
ساهر علي جاسم  
قائممقام  
  
I suggest that whoever sent you the report simply comment on the changeset next time and initiate a discussion instead of wasting DWG’s time.  
  
Regards,
SomeoneElse (2024-11-21 10:32:45+00:00): @LockOnGuy Can you provide evidence of current external mainly-Arab signage?  It is you who is "wasting the DWG's time" with "a nameplate on [the current mayor's] desk written exclusively in Arabic".
LockOnGuy (2024-11-21 10:36:19+00:00): As I stated, eye survey.    
And the nameplate can be found online, see: https://i.ibb.co/XkrZQZB/image.png
SomeoneElse (2024-11-21 10:50:09+00:00): I've reverted it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/332658571 .    If you can find evidence of actual signage being change, please provide it.  Until then, please do not waste the DWG's time.
LockOnGuy (2024-11-21 10:53:31+00:00): What was your source for this change?    
My source was eye survey.     
Also, see the message I sent on you on OSM now.     
Regards.
SomeoneElse (2024-11-21 11:19:08+00:00): Source was the picture I linked in the first comment above.  You were asked to comment on it but instead talked about the current mayor's desk.
SomeoneElse (2024-11-21 11:21:35+00:00): Please do not try and communicate with the DWG via private messages to individual members.  If you want to reply to a ticket, reply to an email or message associated with that ticket.  
If you want to comment publicly on a changeset, do that.
If you want to comment somewhere that everyone in the community can see, please use the forum, perhaps https://community.openstreetmap.org/tag/iraq .
LockOnGuy (2024-11-22 22:51:44+00:00): >Source was the picture I linked in the first comment above.
But the name on the sign does not match the one you put in 'name'
And you also changed the Arabic name which was also correct before. 
        
In top of that, the name you used is not clear and might give confusions, as you just stated the name like Kifri administration office, but you did not state, it is for the District of Kifri? or the subdistrict of Kifri? Because each has it's own office. Before your edit, it was clear and correct. 
    
We should not leave this mistake on OSM like this, and shall be corrected.         
      
Also, what is the date of this picture? and when it was taken? before or after my edit? Did you ask this question to the one who sent it?
In OSM, we should not rely on images that may be old and prefer them to other modern sources that may not rely on images, such as survey.    
   
Regards.
SomeoneElse (2024-11-22 23:32:39+00:00): If you have more up-to-date pictures please discuss on the forum.  Something at https://community.openstreetmap.org/tags/c/help-and-support/7/all/iraq would be a good place to start.
LockOnGuy (2024-11-23 00:17:38+00:00): This doesn't address the issues I mentioned at the comment above.    
The picture you used as "source" do not match the name you put. You did not notice this?
LockOnGuy (2024-11-23 00:21:31+00:00): And a simple online search showing the picture is over 3 years old https://www.gulanmedia.com/ar/story/267083/
SomeoneElse (2024-11-23 00:28:45+00:00): If you have more up-to-date pictures please discuss on the forum. Something at https://community.openstreetmap.org/tags/c/help-and-support/7/all/iraq would be a good place to start.

You have consistently shown bias towards your preferred language and political affiliation in Iraq.  Other contributors have shown bias towards their preferred languages too.  This is evidence is needed for these changes and why we've suggested a discussion in the public forum.
SomeoneElse (2024-11-23 00:32:15+00:00): s/is evidence/is why evidence/
LockOnGuy (2024-11-23 00:58:48+00:00): Andy,     
Firstly, I had no interest or bias at all about having a specific language over the other. And also just for your information, Arabic is not my mother language, or the language we speak at home, and unfortunately, I find it really absurd that I have to share such personal information to debunk an accusation.    
    
Secondly I agree about the discussion should be on a public form, but here I'm talking about the name you used, which is vague and not accurate as I stated, and not backed by any source. I'm not talking about the language at all, but about the name itself is just wrong and missing the key feature in it's name.        
     
So let's assume the sign now just changed to Kurdish, you are preferring to have a incorrect name in the more used language in town, or an accurate name used by the majority of the state? respectfully, please answer this.       
And ok let's say you preferer the incorrect name to be in the 'name' tag, then why did you also made name:ar wrong when it was also correct? this has nothing to do with this matter.     
         
Lastly, I don't know what your problem is with me. In a similar example, I made a correct edit by deleting an incorrect name that is not used in a certain language, but you blocked me in user_blocks/15652 for a week based on a complaint from a user who does not speak that language at all! As proof that the deletion I made previously was correct, a user who speaks that language redeleted the wrong name that I deleted 2 days later, but you did not block him. What does this mean? By the way, I sent an email regarding this block but you ignored it and did not revoke the block. https://osm.mapki.com/history/way/1241152677
user_21425661 (2024-10-16 08:01:23+00:00): You don't seem to have provided a source. Where did you get the opening hours?
Mxdanger (2024-10-16 08:38:26+00:00): Hi, the opening hours for this POI can be found on the website. Hope this helps.
user_21425661 (2024-10-16 10:40:17+00:00): Thanks, first party websites are indeed a valid source for OSM. The LWG have OKed it. To avoid this kind of confusion you can add a source on your changeset. iD walks you through this when you click "Save"
Mxdanger (2024-10-17 23:28:14+00:00): There is no confusion here. Thanks for asking though.
lipuma (2024-10-21 08:05:19+00:00): Hey A67, volgens mij heb je per ongeluk de building=* tag van het Mauritshuis gebouw verwijderd.
A67-A67 (2024-10-21 21:26:47+00:00): Bedankt! Ik heb de tag hersteld.
5m4u9 (2024-10-15 02:37:11+00:00): Hola bienvenid@!

Hay varios errores en tu edición:

* no debes colocar el nombre "casa" o similares a las edificaciones. solo cuando son hospitales, mercados, o edificios que tiene nombre propio.

* las áreas que dibujaste debes rectangulizarlas presionando la tecla Q al editar.

* elegiste mal la categoria para las edificaciones, elegiste terrenos, debes escribir casa, departmentos, o similares.

Vuelve a intentar!
tyfi (2024-10-14 00:10:59+00:00): These points all correspond to businesses, likely still active. Need more research
mmis-isra (2025-02-26 13:03:28+00:00): What was your reason for the renaming? The original name is the official name of the company.
Davileci (2025-02-26 13:32:59+00:00): Osmose
mmis-isra (2025-02-26 13:48:23+00:00): The wiki states: »Do not map for Osmose, keepright, etc. Only fix real errors«.
I can assure you that the original name is correct in upper case because this is the official name of the company.
Davileci (2025-02-26 15:11:07+00:00): Sorry, I already have fixed my edition.
woodpeck_repair (2024-11-13 21:05:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159107632 where the changeset comment is: revert un-trustworthy/fictional golf mapping
Joseph R P (2024-10-20 17:01:43+00:00): Hello,

The road that you are tagging as primary here is not actually part of West Main Road and is just a frontage road for accessing properties addressed to W Main Road. It's not used by through traffic and should not be tagged as primary or any higher than residential/unclassified. Additionally, these ramps here should not be tagged as motorway links since the motorway itself (Route 24) terminates at them, and that little section of Route 114 isn't actually part of the freeway.
AngocA (2024-11-10 17:22:50+00:00): Hola Jaider

Super que estés mapeando ríos y quebradas, sin embargo, un river no se puede convertir en stream, es como si el río perdiera caudal.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1323741031/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1323741030/history#map=17/6.171092/-75.658595
Si tienes alguna pregunta no dudes en contactarme.

Andres G.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2024-10-15 17:49:50+00:00): I was having the idea that it was preferable to align roads on the motor_vehicle lanes instead of on the overall center for navigation/routing reasons. Is there a reason to center geographically on the overall width of the street instead?
une abeille (2024-10-15 18:29:39+00:00): It depends if the bike lane is drawn as its own way or not. Because it is included as a tag, it makes sense to center the line in the middle of the entire span. I think it makes more sense as to why when you look at it with the JOSM lanes plugin. Centering the way in the middle of the drivable space means that the way's width will be too far to the west and not far enough to the east, in this case. Centering it in the middle of the driving lane also implies that roads are for cars — and while that might be the de facto norm in North America, it isn't strictly true.

But I haven't been able to find any discussion on it. I've been following the way that it was done in other areas I used to map, and whenever I've encountered a road here that was not aligned to the middle of the physical pavement it seemed to be because there was once a bike lane mapped as a separate way that was removed. (Usually you can tell because of some leftover nodes.) So I moved them back into alignment as part of the final cleanup when adding the bike lane tags.
une abeille (2024-10-15 18:31:04+00:00): Additionally, aligning roads to the center of the driving lanes would also necessitate a lot of realignment if the lane layout ever changes, like if they reverse a oneway and change which side the parking and bike lane are on. Whereas if it is centered in the physical width of the paved area, only tag changes are needed.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2024-10-15 21:40:01+00:00): I agree with most of this. However, you can always use the placement tag to specify how the line is drawn related to the lanes (middle_of/left_of/right_of/transition)
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2024-10-15 21:40:35+00:00): See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Placement
zstadler (2024-10-15 15:14:47+00:00): In what way is it a tourist attraction?
As far as I remember, access to the foresters' tower is forbidden.
Yitzchak M (2024-10-15 15:22:21+00:00): True! Although the Forest Ranger at Mitzpe Masua did one time let me and my kids go up and see the view. However, there are hikers, myself included, who like to "collect" Watchtowers. To see them up close and photograph them. It's a hobby. Do you want me to send you a list of attractions that are attractions but you can't go in them? ☺
zstadler (2024-10-15 18:29:02+00:00): I thought i was missing something, as I haven't been there for a while.
If you "collect" watch towers, then you can look for man_made=tower (a tag that's missing here) + tower:type=observation
For a knowledgeable mapper such as yourself, that does not kake it an attraction.
Unfortunately, iMO, IHM lets anyone easily add a 'tourist attraction" for anything that does not fall into any other category. 
Unlike you, most of them do not bother putting the appropriate OSM tags afterwards.
Yitzchak M (2024-10-16 02:19:14+00:00): 1) You: "If you "collect" watch towers, then you can look for man_made=tower (a tag that's missing here) + tower:type=observation". 
I don't understand. The man_made=tower and tower:type=observation tags are not missing. I had added them in immediately. However, they ARE missing from the list of choices in the POI's. ☺

2) Oooh. Thanks for the tip. Didn't think of that. I always collect them when I spontaneously see them.
Yitzchak M (2024-10-16 02:24:55+00:00): By the way, THANK YOU for the compliments! ☺
zstadler (2024-10-16 06:18:44+00:00): My bad, I somehow missed the existence of the man_made=tower tag.

Please see
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions
regarding the current name tags, and in general.
Yitzchak M (2024-10-16 06:31:43+00:00): 1)  No harm, no foul.

2)  Understood! I will attempt to be more careful...
nevw (2024-10-14 05:27:54+00:00): Hi Tablenine, I noticed an improbable ‘place of worship’ tagged next door to your edit. Can you delete it if it is an incorrect entry.
Also I notice the building in this area are tagged twice with their house number. Only one time is preferred and added to the building is probably preferred instead of a separate address node.
Often in osm the address nodes are added initially via a data import and subsequently the building are gradually mapped. It is good to merge the data into the building footprint.
nevw (2024-10-14 08:37:01+00:00): Mapping a building and having a separate address node is fine as is having all the info added to the building. You are free to choose either method.
But there shouldn't be a duplication of the address for each house.
Tablenine (2024-10-14 11:16:17+00:00): I do believe the place of worship is present at that location.
Thank you for your advice on what to do about the house numbers!
In subsequent edits I just placed the building with no address tags and left the address node.
I will fix this edit and the duplicated house numbers in its vicinity.
Tablenine (2024-10-14 11:20:34+00:00): I have now deleted the nodes for houses which have their house number listed as a tag on the building. Was this the correct way to go about doing this?
nevw (2024-10-14 11:32:54+00:00): Yes all seems ok now, thanks.
flohoff (2024-10-14 09:05:40+00:00): Moin,
du kannst übrigens hier überall 

old_addr:street 

drauf lassen - Dann sollte man im Nominatim (Also dem Geocoder auf der ersten Seite) auch die alten Addressen noch finden.

So als gedanke - Das ist auch irgendwo in den addr tag geschichten im Wiki dokumentiert.

Flo
nrailuj (2024-10-15 03:50:51+00:00): Moin,
Danke für die Info. Habe es im Wiki gefunden und hier geändert:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157902671

Julian
Hufkratzer (2024-10-14 18:45:48+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1323771239 looks like a riding arena and not like a riding centre (leisure=horse_riding). In OSM riding arenas are usually tagged leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian, examples: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/607473493 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1116841118; compare https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=horse_riding.

In JOSM you can use the preset for equestrian sport to tag them.
DaanLT (2024-10-15 07:15:54+00:00): hi, thanks
tyfi (2024-10-14 05:19:47+00:00): These were formerly occupied at some point based on web searches.
NeisBot (2024-10-14 05:32:38+00:00): Hi abs_111, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 1 natural(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.
#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=157859532
pitscheplatsch (2024-10-14 05:59:04+00:00): Revert of https://osm.org/changeset/157668408
bxl-forever (2024-11-05 10:30:12+00:00): Votre modification comporte un grand nombre d’erreurs et a été nettoyée.
mavl (2025-03-07 15:09:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:09:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:08:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:07:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:07:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:07:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
osmviborg (2024-10-14 06:32:30+00:00): Adressepunktets placering er bestemt af din kommune. Punkterne opdateres automatisk, så undlad venligt at flytte eller på anden måde ændre dem.
mavl (2025-03-07 15:05:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2024-10-14 10:55:21+00:00): Здравствуйте. Напишите, пожалуйста, зачем вы удалили проезд?  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1096878201/history
GlobalScan (2024-10-15 05:02:57+00:00): Во время правки проезд удалил и заменил новой линией с откорректированным положением относительно других объектов. Надо было передвинуть имеющийся проезд. Прошу прощения.
eggie (2024-10-14 10:38:43+00:00): Dag AvN

Wanneer ik zo kijk zie ik de gewichtbeperking ook op het bruggetje, maar ontbreekt emergency=yes daar  Ook het noordelijk wegdeel na de brug.
Dan zal je tagging niet helpen op deze manier.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-10-14 11:20:41+00:00): https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1SCK

(Wellicht no run klikken)
eggie (2024-10-14 10:35:00+00:00): Dag AvN  Je vraagt feedback   Wanneer het doel is om de maxweight	4.8	4.8
maxwidth	2.3	2.3
te overrulen is het okay, maar dan heb je wel een paar gaten laten zitten.
Zie de overpass
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=157861567

MVG
eggie
Baloo Uriza (2024-10-23 14:59:26+00:00): These polygons are a lot easier to maintain and keep up to date long term when they don't include other kinds of land use such as landuse=highway.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157861922
ArizonaMapper (2024-10-23 17:49:46+00:00): Highway isn't a land use?
ArizonaMapper (2024-10-23 17:50:03+00:00): And it doesn't look like it shares any nodes with any roads
Baloo Uriza (2024-10-30 14:09:42+00:00): I'm seeing some commercial landuse and streets bisecting the larger landuse=residential.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157861922