piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
dbqeditor (2024-03-18 22:33:25+00:00): I am doing things on the fly. I don't have time to leave responses. I am improving the map and that's what matters to me.

Thanks for your concern though!
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-03-24 23:28:09+00:00): Reviewed
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148757841
arjunaraoc (2024-03-28 05:26:24+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).

check my improvement, i.e deletion https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149251287  do not provide google docs reference as they are not independent or of authoritative nature.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148758128
tastrax (2024-04-05 06:09:22+00:00): There is no need to add the hashtags as names on the buildings - it automatically gets added to the changeset
diamondarmorsteve (2024-05-18 15:27:01+00:00): These routes should not be marked as secondary just for having a certain legal designation. They should be classified based on the cities/towns/villages they connect, and size/condition. Most of Missouri's supplemental (lettered) routes should be tertiary since most of them are not the best route between towns and villages, but do serve as collectors for many rural homes.
Bierphysik (2024-06-18 09:31:08+00:00): Ich glaube du hast https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/26341886#map=18/51.22397/9.91326 kaputt gemacht. ich stze es mal zurück.
eserte (2024-03-17 17:55:48+00:00): Die alten Straßenschilder mit "Manteuffelstraße" hängen noch (heute erst gesehen). Deshalb bitte noch "name" beibehalten, bis sich das ändert.

Siehe auch Diskussion in https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3785371
Colin Smale (2024-03-17 10:15:43+00:00): The coastline segments you are removing were surveyed as MHWM by the OS, which is the usual basis for the coastline in OSM. Of course having all tidal rivers as "coastline" is not convenient, but the MHW limits can be easily converted to waterway=river polygons which are likely to be more reliable than any aerial photos. How about reusing the surveyed limits instead of tracing from the aerials?
tobych (2024-03-17 21:04:41+00:00): Sure, whatever is the norm for UK river areas. Although if we assume the aerial imagery wasn't offset horrifically, the areas were often not even covering the visible water. I'm not as familiar with UK OSM norms as I am with US norms, and I've not mapped areas of rivers in either country. I'm happy to follow your lead: you've been contributing since 2008, I see.
tobych (2024-03-17 21:13:18+00:00): I woudn't say this was "easy", by the way. The only reason I noticed the river problems was because I was looking at Map Notes near Berwick, where I used to live. The validator showed me loads of erros on the Cuckmere river. We had the river way crossing the coastline several times, and the administrative boundary glued to the river area at many points: it still is at some points, because it was just too much to bother with last night. Also, paths and bridges were messed up. I'm guessing this is partly because of the historical origins of OSM.
tobych (2024-03-17 21:17:37+00:00): I imagine it'll be best to wait until the coastline rendering gets updated before continuing.

Looks like there's similar mapping of river-as-coastline near Burnham-on-Crouch.
tobych (2024-04-03 01:45:06+00:00): Is there a GIS layer (any format) I can use, with the surveyed data on? Otherwise I can try to figure out a way of using the old data.
Manu4bb9a (2024-03-17 19:25:32+00:00): Bonsoir, 
Je vois que vous (tu) retouche(s⋅z) les immenses relations "farmland".
Dans ma zone de confort (Vers sur Selle) je voulais les supprimer pour les refaire proprement, car là, elles englobent les routes, chemin et autres, et leurs frontières utilisent lesdits chemins, ce qui rend leurs modifications très complexes.
Là, je parle de la relation 12221688 qui m'embête un peu... 
Dans ma pratique d'OSM, je préfère définir champ par champ, sans me raccrocher aux chemins...
Mais comme vous (tu) fai( (te⋅s) un énorme boulot, je ne veux pas interférer et tout casser.
Comme in dit dans le coin, dis-moi quoi 🤠
Max-Kritic (2024-03-17 20:42:11+00:00): Effectivement, j'essaye de réduire des grandes relations farmand. Cela sera plus pratique pour aller dans le détail après.

J'utilise l'analyse "Building on agricultural land" de Osmose pour cela. Cela détecte les maisons dans les zones agricoles. L'outil Josm est plus facile aussi pour travailler. Je ne fais pas spécifiquement ton coin, mais en gros le Pas-de-Calais et la Somme.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-03-17 08:00:14+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6825018014
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1263404662

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
mapboy63 (2024-03-17 22:05:09+00:00): access=bus doesn't make any sense. bus=yes or bus=designated is correct, and already tagged.
Frans S (2024-03-18 10:25:33+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
You changed a road , tagged 'unclassified' into 'track'
In  my opinion, unclassified suits better because it directs to a small settlement.
This is what the wiki says about tracks 
-----
 	highway=track 			This tag is usually used for roads providing access to agricultural or forestry facilities. In Africa, roads within National Parks mostly qualify as tracks too. If possible, please use also in conjunction with tracktype=*. Never use track to mark an unpaved or unsealed road in built-up areas. Such roads should be tagged according to the local conventions (usually highway=residential) and complemented by surface=*. 
----
Another tagged 'track' changed to path due to the narrow trace (max 1.5 mtr wide) and the fact that it connects a settlement as well.
Best regards
MxxCon (2024-03-20 04:28:06+00:00): Hello.
Please write more descriptive changeset messages. just pasting wikidata article number doesn't help others understand what you are editing.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148760662
opendcc (2024-07-07 09:06:38+00:00): Dafür ist es jetzt gar nicht mehr zu sehen - siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:place=municipality?uselang=de
Bischofsgrün ist nach wiki ein village.
Frans S (2024-03-17 10:20:17+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this projects.
You tagged all traces of roads as 'unclassified' ,even the very narrow ones.
Please measure the width of a trace before you tag it.
Narrow traces (<2 mtr = path)  tag other unclassified.
How  to measure the width of a road in IDeditor ?

Ctrl+⇧ Shift+M – toggle measurement panel
Draw a line between the shoulders of a trace (zoom in very far) and read the distance.

Best regards and keep mapping
berndw (2024-03-17 08:44:46+00:00): Ist Bitburg, nicht Oberhone ;-)

Beschreibende Namen, nur damit da was besteht sind bääh,entfernt.
Und einen Hinweis bearbeitet
Herman Lee (2024-03-20 23:14:26+00:00): 线路已修改
habi (2024-03-17 09:34:43+00:00): Probably should have been reverted,  not removed, as it was a peak for several years: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2491265996/history/2
limes11 (2024-03-17 09:43:50+00:00): Thx. Did not check that. Fixed now
Frans S (2024-03-17 09:32:11+00:00): Thanks for mapping.
You tag paths as footway.  Just the tag 'Path'is sufficient. Please read what the wiki says about it
----
Paths are usually impassable for motorised vehicles. (However, African motorcyclists can sometimes do the most improbable stunts.) In order to mark a path as appropriate for cycling, add bicycle=yes. Never use path to mark an unpaved or unsealed road in built-up residential areas: Such roads should be tagged according to the local conventions (usually highway=residential if passable by vehicles and pedestrians, or highway=footway for pedestrian only where they can sometimes be separated from another parallel highway for vehicles) and complemented by surface=*. 

Best regards
NorthCrab_upload (2024-03-17 09:10:25+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11725186087

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2024-03-17 09:20:28+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11725231240

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
jqngarcia (2024-03-19 12:10:17+00:00): Hola expositocv, buena aportación la de la rotonda, recuerda que debe llevar la etiqueta junction=roundabout, y vigila con las rutas de bus, que se rompen con segun que ediciones.

Salud y mapas, JQN
Frans S (2024-03-19 12:25:00+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please extend and connect paths/roads to each other where a trace is visible.
Use the correct tag, <2 mtr wide= path. others which connects settlements, unclassified.
This webpage might be helpful as well

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Bgirardot/West_African_HOT_Mapping_Tips
Best regards
VLD549 (2024-04-27 06:27:38+00:00): Hi, could you provide a link to the source that was used? I can't verify the name change from Calamiteiteningang J to Calamiteiteningang L as I can't find it on Google results. 
Thank you!
Joopvdl (2024-04-27 06:59:21+00:00): Of course. I've surveyed the area and also had Mapillary running. You can see the emergency entrance clearly labeled L in this photo:

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=52.424184700003&lng=5.7665828999986&z=17.07089137243829&pKey=390768450558742&focus=photo
VLD549 (2024-05-24 08:23:25+00:00): Thank you.
NobodysNightmare (2024-08-26 07:24:35+00:00): Habe gerade gesehen, dass die PV-Anlage in Rathenow Süd als "building=roof" gekennzeichnet wurde. Würde das nicht bedeuten, dass die angegebene Fläche ein eigenes Dach darstellt?

Wenn du nichts dagegen hast, dann würde ich das Tagging als building=roof entfernen und durch generator:place=roof ersetzen, das wird auch hier so vorgeschlagen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:generator:source%3Dsolar
ironspock (2024-08-26 14:29:08+00:00): Die entsprechenden Korrekturen stehen bei mir noch auf der "ToDo"-Liste...
Richtigerweise muesste es "location=roof" sein
NobodysNightmare (2024-08-27 11:19:23+00:00): Danke für die schnellen fixes :)
eggie (2024-03-17 16:11:36+00:00): Dag Pj   Zo te zien is dat gebouw(overkapping?) veel kleiner. Er staat zelfs een auto naast geparkeerd.

Kijk je nog even?

MVG
eggie
Popiejopie12 (2024-03-17 18:31:02+00:00): Yess, heb het aangepast. bedankt voor het checken
eggie (2024-03-17 18:41:59+00:00): 👍
Frans S (2024-03-17 10:10:41+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
About tagging of narrow traces.
This is what the wiki says about it. Don't use the tag 'footway' here.
Best regards

Paths are usually impassable for motorised vehicles. (However, African motorcyclists can sometimes do the most improbable stunts.) In order to mark a path as appropriate for cycling, add bicycle=yes. Never use path to mark an unpaved or unsealed road in built-up residential areas: Such roads should be tagged according to the local conventions (usually highway=residential if passable by vehicles and pedestrians, or highway=footway for pedestrian only where they can sometimes be separated from another parallel highway for vehicles) and complemented by surface=*.
jb54osm (2024-04-08 11:26:02+00:00): Hi Nicolas,

I corrected some StreetComplete changes here.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149730649
Frans S (2024-03-31 11:05:08+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping. 
Please map more accurate. Often your mappings are far oversized !
Best regards and keep mapping
ivanbranco (2024-03-17 11:02:12+00:00): Ciao Sergio P, grazie per le modifiche

solo un appunto, per il tag "wikimedia_commons" ci sarebbe una sintassi da rispettare, in pratica dovrebbe essere wikimedia_commons=File:LDP-181-05.jpg invece di wikimedia_commons=https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:LDP-181-05.jpg
riusciresti ad allinearti per le prossime modifiche?

grazie ancora
Hufkratzer (2024-03-18 11:48:24+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17354655 does not look like a horse riding centre; perhaps it is a horse racing track (leisure=track + sport=horse_racing); see Wiki.
kartler175 (2024-03-18 15:11:31+00:00): Please check and fix:
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=13.01087&lat=46.66625&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.95&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways
manjarogailtal (2024-03-18 15:17:34+00:00): thx
kartler175 (2024-03-18 16:03:23+00:00): You seem to have misunderstood the concept of multipolygons. Multipolygons are designed to represent areas. The relation may only contain ways as members that form closed rings. At least one of them must have the role "outer". Rings within outer rings are assigned the "inner" role. In this case, the areas of the inner members do not belong to the area represented by the multipolygon. Therefore 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17355403 is not a valid multipolygon because https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1246848233, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5148538660, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5148538661 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5136318266 are not valid members.
In addition i think, the areas of the buldings are part of the industrial landuse, not excluded.
manjarogailtal (2024-03-18 16:24:01+00:00): i hate this. Fixed most of it. Maybe i will have a closer look. For now there should be no issue

If you find something what does not work out. pls revert/edit/delete it. Thanks a lot.
pitscheplatsch (2024-03-19 17:44:30+00:00): Hi kgvsuedhang, welcome to OSM.

Just a test?
aTarom (2024-03-17 11:44:12+00:00): Hola , gràcies per editar, per els noms locals tenim "loc_name"
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Local_names_(loc_name)
per
"name"="Plaça d'Espanya (Nom popular: Plaça roja)"
a
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/215556861/history
salutacions
Poblejant (2024-03-17 21:47:13+00:00): Gràcies per informar. Crec que ho he corregit.
Константин Гам (2024-03-18 15:53:06+00:00): Вы добавили не проектируемый тоннель, а как будто бы существующий. Пожалуйста внимательней подбирайте теги, либо оставляйте заметки на карте, чтобы другие редакторы внесли данные. Спасибо.
alefteris (2024-03-18 19:44:09+00:00): Hi there. Thanks for your edits and the addition of the service roads inside the port.

I'd like to discuss the following deletions/changes:

a) The POI node 9671880818 with amenity=coast_guard was deleted and instead the amenity=police was added in the building.

Why is this change needed? There is already a used tag for coast guard (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcoast_guard). It has a proposed status, but it's used in other coast guard POIs in Greece and abroad and it's more appropriate for this POI kind. If the change was done, because the amenity=coast_guard doesn't get an icon in some maps, but the police one does, I'd suggest having a read of this: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer

b) The port's landuse tag value was changed from landuse=industrial back to  landuse=harbour. You basically reverted to the 1st version that you created it. I had changed the tag to landuse=industrial because that's the recommendation on the wiki page of the tag (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dharbour) "Consider using rather landuse=industrial with industrial=port providing the same information in a structured way.". I have also checked how ports are tagged in other locations, and most of them use the suggested tag combination with landuse=industrial.

c) For this one, I'm less sure, but should the road inside the port be classified as secondary highway instead of just be a service road? What’s the reasoning for this change?

I look forward to your comments, fellow Corfu mapper :)
George Karidis (2024-03-20 11:41:15+00:00): Hey alefteris,
a) I removed the POI and added it's tags to the building, I changed the "amenity" tag because I wanted the symbol to appear on the map and I believe that using the tag "police" is not "tagging for the renderer" beacuse the coast guard in Greece has many similarities with the police. If you think this is not appropriate please change the tag to "coast_guard".

b) Leukimmi port is not an industrial port, it serves passenger traffic and a small amount of cargo traffic. 
"Ports or parts of ports serving passengers, without cargo traffic may require a different tag such as commercial=port as such areas may not qualify for landuse=industrial" 
See more info: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:industrial%3Dport

c) For the road classified as a secondary highway is because this road links the ferry route to the National Road 23, although changing it to "unclassified" or "service" I believe wouldn't make much of a difference.
"Use highway=secondary to tag highways which are not part of major routes, but nevertheless form a link in the national route network" 
See more info: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dsecondary

Let me know your thoughts and thank you for commenting.
woodpeck (2024-03-17 20:35:37+00:00): Dear university team, please note the following: (1) if you edit OSM as part of your job or as directed by someone else (eg the university), then please observe our "organised editing guidelines" at https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines which, among other things, ask you to tell us who you are on your profile page. (2) when adding names to OSM, please observe our "name is the name only" rule described on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names - some names you have specified here ("Central Library 1000 seats", "35 dormitories for teachers" etc.) are *descriptions* and not names. Please correct these names; if the buildings do not have proper names then just leave the name field empty.
University of Sétif 1 - Ferhat Abbas (2024-03-19 07:51:31+00:00): I corrected the names
University of Sétif 1 - Ferhat Abbas (2024-03-21 07:28:04+00:00): Dear Sir,

I hope this message finds you well.

I'm contacting you with an official email account of Setif 1 University - Ferhat Abbas.

Now we're working on a project to fill the University geographic data on OSM. After making changes we noticed that random people that do not make part of our official administrative members can insert some geographic data that is not correct and this may confuse users of OSM and we can provide proofs about that.

So we're wondering if it would be possible to give us an admin account and the possibility to be able to modilfy our geographic data on our three campuses : El Bez, El Maabouda and Travaux and forbid any other changes made by random people.

Please feel free to contact us for further information.

Best regards,
woodpeck (2024-03-25 10:05:15+00:00): OpenStreetMap is a collaborative project in which everyone is welcome to record the reality on the ground; the university does not get to control what is (or is not) mapped on the university campus. There might, for example, be an "unofficial" path used by students but the university leadership does not want students to use it - nevertheless the path exists an can be recorded in OSM. The people who make these edits are not "random people", they are OSM mappers and they have 100% the same rights as your staff members have. OSM is not a tool by which to promote some "official" view of things; if you want full control over the map then you need to make a copy of OSM and edit it in a graphics program. OSM itself is independent of your university.
University of Sétif 1 - Ferhat Abbas (2024-04-03 11:15:13+00:00): Our univercity has 2 branches (univercity ferhat abbes and lbez) I want to give them the same name but the name of univercity ferhat abbes is loked because it has a wikidata tag, how can i change it?
mavl (2024-03-23 14:38:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149053741 where the changeset comment is: The
4004 (2024-03-17 22:32:31+00:00): Добрый день, спасибо за правку.
насколько я вижу, неймы (и видимо to/from) в отношениях БЧ были обновлены при переходе осм на беларускую - чтобы совпадать с остановочными пунктами
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-10 13:42:07+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8591833335/history has shop = footwear that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
shop=footwear ? What kind of shop, if any is here? Is it intentional that it is used instead of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=shoes?
arkarjun (2024-05-11 05:17:24+00:00): Hi, Corrected the tag, thanks for pointing out
olecky (2024-03-17 11:39:04+00:00): I meant "I didn't follow it all the way to 43". See https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4156519 for continuation.
SunnyIsland10 (2024-03-21 23:39:59+00:00): Greetings MACEDONICUS:

Thank you for your mapping efforts in North Macedonia! 

I noticed that you have made some changes on road classifications seen in these changesets:  https://osmcha.org/changesets/148610520, https://osmcha.org/changesets/148768216, https://osmcha.org/changesets/148767579. I have updated your edits back to highway=motorway_link, highway=trunk, and highway=trunk_link respectively. This decision was made based on the definition of what a 'link' is according to OSM wiki page found here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_link. Since these highways are channelized and their main purpose is to enter/exit the motorway, link classifications are more fitting.           

I would also like to ask about the ref tag edits seen in this changeset: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148763966. Are these edits just related to local roads within the Veles city, or will this editing effort be extended to other higher-classified highways as well? Do you have any resources or documentation that you’re using for these updates that you would be willing to share? If these are for local refs, what do you think about using these tags: reg_ref=* or loc_ref=*? More information on those tags can be found here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ref. 

Thank you!
SunnyIsland10
mavl (2024-03-23 14:38:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149053741 where the changeset comment is: The
os-emmer (2024-03-17 12:07:37+00:00): Die Beschreibung des Änderungssatzes ist Fehlerhaft. Ich habe hier addr:country=* korrigiert.
os-emmer (2024-03-17 12:07:33+00:00): Die Beschreibung des Änderungssatzes ist Fehlerhaft. Ich habe hier addr:country=* korrigiert.
os-emmer (2024-03-17 12:07:28+00:00): Die Beschreibung des Änderungssatzes ist Fehlerhaft. Ich habe hier addr:country=* korrigiert.
os-emmer (2024-03-17 12:07:23+00:00): Die Beschreibung des Änderungssatzes ist Fehlerhaft. Ich habe hier addr:country=* korrigiert.