piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2023-03-07 14:10:44+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, during the validation process
I noticed that you are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.
We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. Just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.
Please map each building accurate over the rooflines.
Square each rectangular building with the Q key.
Nodes of buildings may NOT  connect to other buildings or features.
The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 
Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
I continue on a new message.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132797364
Frans S (2023-03-07 14:16:40+00:00): AS said. New message.
You spend your time on mapping unwanted objects.
Please read the instructions and act accordingly.
You mapped landuse objects, not hindered by knowledge how to map them and how to avoid errors. Now you introduced quite a lot of errors which have to be solved. Sorry for your and our time.
Best regards and please keep mapping in line with the request.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132797364
mavl (2023-04-23 16:08:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:01:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:56:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:05:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
gurglypipe (2023-02-20 16:15:05+00:00): Heya, thanks for your edits in Sedbergh, it’s nice to see someone improving the map here :D

I guess you noticed my tweak to the naming of the schools — I hope that was OK. I’m local-ish (north Lancashire) but noticed the tagging was a bit non-standard.

Thanks for improving the outlines of the schools, it’s really useful to have that from local knowledge. I’ve just made one little tweak to snap the boundary of Settlebeck to a hedge where the hedge definitely forms the property boundary: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132797986 — I hope that is correct?

Cheers :)
CityEnginer (2023-02-20 16:20:57+00:00): Hey there! I've just seen this comment. I am better at building digitising than all the tags. So sorry for any issues I will try and get better!  I am a local and do some mapping in my professional sphere. 
However I have very rarely done OSM stuff so consider me new :)  I've gone on too long to ignore the gaping holes in mapping around here!
thanks for your tips and kind suggestions don't stop.
gurglypipe (2023-02-20 16:26:07+00:00): Don’t apologise! Everyone’s new here at some point and there’s a lot to take in when you first start! :)
mavl (2023-04-23 16:11:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:00:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
michalgwo (2023-02-20 16:03:49+00:00): added hashtags by mistake, just ignore it
mavl (2023-04-23 16:11:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-02 09:03:28+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10681148158/history - is it shop=erotic ?

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Derotic
mycota (2025-04-04 18:09:02+00:00): Yes, it is. I fixed it.
mavl (2023-04-23 15:50:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
Marych_ (2023-02-22 05:20:42+00:00): Hi!
Where did you get data regarding new border location?
I did found any information that has been published
mavl (2023-04-23 16:09:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
CityEnginer (2023-02-20 16:17:48+00:00): Ah thank you gurglypipe! apologies I wasn't 100% sure.
gurglypipe (2023-02-20 16:24:08+00:00): Definitely better to leave things disconnected if you’re not sure, since it’s a lot easier to connect them up again afterwards than to disentangle things which are already connected :)

One thing I find really useful for property boundaries is the OSMUK Cadastral Parcels layer. If you haven’t found it already, it’s under ‘Overlays’ in ‘Background Settings’ on the right.

Just message me if you have any questions about editing locally — happy to help out where I can. :)
Frans S (2023-03-04 13:39:10+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, during the validation process
I noticed that you are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.
We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. Just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.
Please map each building accurate over the rooflines.
Square each rectangular building with the Q key.
Nodes of buildings may NOT  connect to other buildings or features.
The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 
Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132798074
Dimitar155 (2023-02-20 17:22:00+00:00): Is it possible for a car to go through https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/666294544? If not, you should add motor_vehicle=no or reclassify it as a path or pedestrian street (depending on the width).
rhhs (2023-02-27 16:20:16+00:00): It's physically not possible, but legally still allowed, so the access tag should not change. It's still a road...
Dimitar155 (2023-02-27 17:13:41+00:00): In that case barrier=planter should be added to the planters (since they are placed to block the traffic). Even if it is legally allowed (i.e. there is no sign that forbids car traffic), there is no sane person who is going to drive there (since he would need to move two quite heavy planters or drive on the grassy area). The other problem is that all routers currently direct the traffic through these planters which is not quite right if you ask me (https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_car&route=42.68461%2C23.34832%3B42.68554%2C23.34966#map=18/42.68495/23.34962). I agree that it may have been a road at some point in the past but currently it is part of an area for a park (see plot 68134.108.217 on https://nag.sofia.bg/OpenMap/Zones).
rhhs (2023-02-27 17:27:48+00:00): I see. When I added the planters, I assumed that barrier=yes was the default. I now added the barrier tags, so routers will not send motor vehicles there.
Frans S (2023-02-22 09:32:32+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator during the validation process
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
You are an experienced mapper (based on the number of changesets) and expected a higher quality.
Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings not accurate mapped and squared.
Includes the shadow in your mapping



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132798250
MxxCon (2023-02-21 07:18:00+00:00): Hello.
Do you know if the playground south of the school associated with that school?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132798285
ivanbranco (2023-02-26 14:56:16+00:00): Ciao Marco,

il confine della circoscrizione 2 è già mappata qua: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2615145/history

questa way che hai creato usa un value di boundary non documentato "boundary of districts" ed è incompleto. Io sarei per cancellarlo visto che esiste già mappato integralmente con i giusti tag.

I confini (che spesso richiedono l'uso di relazioni type=boundary) forse non sono la cosa migliore per iniziare se sei alle prime armi. Un consiglio potrebbe essere quello di iniziare da cosa piu' piccole (come aggiungere negozi e POI come nodi) e informarsi su quali tag sono documentati sulla Wiki ufficiale: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/

Buon mapping
MarcoM Bernardini (2023-02-27 09:28:54+00:00): Ciao ivanbranco,
grazie per le puntuali indicazioni; il confine della circoscrizione 2 di cui hai indicato il link lo conosco ed è quello amministrativo. Il confine della circoscrizione 2 che sto tracciando non c'è ancora ed è relativo all'area di competenza dell'ufficio tecnico Divisione Suolo e parcheggi, il cui confine è differente dall'amministrativo. Provvedo a cambiare correttamente il value di boundary.

Buon mapping
MxxCon (2023-02-21 07:25:27+00:00): Hello.
Could you please elaborate what are you mapping here?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132798660
Fizzie-DWG (2023-02-26 03:39:36+00:00): It appears to be some form of school within a school? https://www.p36k.org/home_page
Tomas Straupis (2023-02-21 09:58:16+00:00): Šitie pavadinimai yra iš KVR'o. Ten tie pavadinimai taip suregistruoti. Tai siūlyčiau ne ištrinti, o perkelti į official_name.
rbs_ (2023-02-21 11:10:04+00:00): Ačiū, Tomai, greitu metu perkelsiu.
Frans S (2023-02-20 17:06:32+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132799406
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-20 16:50:24+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9950976991
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/158005376
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/253191244

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
A67-A67 (2023-02-20 17:45:12+00:00): Hi. Welcome to Openstreetmap.

I don't know what you're trying to do here, but you've changed the boundary of the United States to a relation that is normally used for speed cameras. Therefore I've reverted your changes.
A67-A67 (2023-02-20 17:45:40+00:00): Speed limits are added with the tag maxspeed to the roads themselves.
Baloo Uriza (2023-02-20 17:56:13+00:00): Just out of curiosity, why are we bulk updating speed limits?  A little hard to work out from the comments and huge bounding box.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132799504
gua222 (2023-02-20 17:59:48+00:00): I am new to Openstreetmap, I trying to generate a dataset of speed limits signs to download and I thought I was saving my work personally
gua222 (2023-02-20 18:18:45+00:00): Sorry about that, maybe this is not the right tool for my needs
Baloo Uriza (2023-02-20 23:39:29+00:00): Probably a better starting place for what you're attempting would be Overpass Turbo?  https://overpass-turbo.eu/
josmougn (2023-03-16 17:43:40+00:00): bonjour geovelo, Avenue du Parc vous avez remplacé highway=cycleway par 
bicycle=designated
highway=footway
surface=compacted
traffic_sign=FR:C113
Ca me parait complétement incohérent ! Le panneau indique une piste cyclable donc l'ancienne version me parait meilleure. 
De mémoire ce n'est pas compacted ici mais asphalt ou concrete (à revérifier sur place).
Le commentaire du groupe de modifications m'inquiète : "Intégration aménagements cyclables SChéma départemental (Paris Terres d'Envol) ". Est-ce que ça veut dire que vous prenez pour argent comptant le SIG des collectivités territoriales sans aller voir sur place ?
AnneP (2023-03-17 07:28:58+00:00): Bonjour,
Nous nous efforçons de cartographier au plus proche du terrain en croisant toujours les sources de données. Dans ce cas, même s'il y a un panneau C113, dans la réalité il s'agit d'un trottoir partagé avec les piétons donc la désignation piste cyclable seule ne me semblait pas totalement juste. Pour ce qui est du type de surface c'est effectivement une erreur. Les tronçons concernés vont être repris.
user_5359 (2023-02-20 17:23:26+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on wiki.osm.org for description on amenity=place_of_worship and healthcare=dentist.
emersonveenstra (2023-02-21 00:13:20+00:00): Hi,

Street names must not be abbreviated in OSM, would you mind fixing https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1112528327 please? Thanks!
iaflyer (2023-02-21 01:58:25+00:00): Well - official county mapping shows it as "CT" not Court. Which should I use?
emersonveenstra (2023-02-21 02:27:18+00:00): Take a look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Abbreviations, just because the county records shorten it to Ct doesn't mean we should as well
kechan (2023-02-20 17:08:01+00:00): "clay" is a typo because JOSM was filling in tags and I wasn't paying very close attention to what I was putting in.
dankarran (2023-02-20 21:25:38+00:00): Maybe Maughold Road? https://www.garff.im/jacks-lane-maughold-notice-of-road-closure/ 

I'll try and dig out some more addresses from Streetside/Mapillary when I get a chance.
mentor (2023-02-25 16:12:12+00:00): Church Road, Maughold Road, Main Road in parts and in whole, all with variations of Hibernia inserted.
dankarran (2023-02-27 18:46:23+00:00): I've seen the Hibernia variation in various places too. Who needs consistent naming anyway? ;)
Frans S (2023-02-20 17:28:25+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping. 
Did you not read the note about mapping of tracks in the instructions ?
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2023-02-22 15:23:13+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, at random or as requested. 
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, during the validation process
I noticed that you are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.
We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.
Each building need to be squared.
Nodes of buildings may not connect to other buildings or features.
The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 
Do not cluster buildings.

Please pay attention to next points:



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132800833
MxxCon (2023-02-21 07:30:05+00:00): Hello.
Please split your edits into smaller geographic regions so that's easier to review them.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132800976
BCNorwich (2023-02-22 09:15:29+00:00): Hi, This changeset contains editing to more than 80 ways, thus making it very difficult pick out errors, by yourself or other contributors. I have however found several instances of duplicated sections of highways where you've placed a new highway atop an existing highway. 
I've removed the following list of highways because they are duplicates.
Way: 1148002804
Way: 1148182504
Way: 1148182496
Way: 1148182518
Way: 1148182508
Way: 1148182519
Way: 1148182517
Way: 1148182510
Way: 1148182511
Way: 1148182512
Way: 1148182513
Way: 1148002774
Way: 1148002775
Way: 1148182524
Way: 1148182520
Way: 1148182521
Way: 1148002783
Way: 1148002780

There's no need to make large changesets, they only make checking the edit more difficult for the mapper or anyone else trying to correct mistakes.

All looks good now, Regards Bernard.
JasmineRanasinghe (2023-02-22 10:02:26+00:00): Hi Bernard,

Thank you for bringing that to my attention. From now onwards I will start to save smaller changesets. With regards to the duplicate ways, I believe I had a few errors with openstreetmap in my browser when making those edits. I tried to delete as many of the duplicates as I could when going back into it but must have missed those so thank you for deleting them.

Regards,
Jasmine
gurglypipe (2023-02-20 17:49:55+00:00): It’s OK to change stuff like this when you have local knowledge and can back it up with other sources.

A note about sources: most other modern maps are unfortunately not suitable sources for editing OSM, as they have copyright restrictions which are incompatible with OSM’s licensing. In particular, Google Maps and Ordnance Survey maps should not be used.

There’s some background on it here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ordnance_Survey

Some subsets of Ordnance Survey data are appropriately licensed, and they’re available as backgrounds in the ID editor already. But looking at (for example) an OS 1:25k map is not allowed.

Probably the easiest way to locally verify a road name like this is to walk to the road and look for the road name sign at junctions.
PT-53 (2023-02-21 09:50:12+00:00): Hallo ti_lo,
hast Du schreibweise des Namen vor Ort überprüft?
Gem. Impressum ist der (volle) Firmenname
Picks Raus Deutschland GmbH
Siehe:
https://picksraus.de/impressum
Grüße
ti-lo (2023-02-21 13:14:56+00:00): Meinst Du das mit vor Ort ? https://assets.ntz.de/SM/images/2014-10-01/nzwz-69dc8fa7-cffe-4747-b8e2-6342c9ab5dfa_F32.jpg
PT-53 (2023-02-21 13:26:57+00:00): Sorry,
aber das ist nicht die Filiale in Riedlingen!.
Grüße
ti-lo (2023-02-21 13:32:24+00:00): Dann schau doch mal vor Ort, ob die Riedlinger zufälligerweise ein ganz anderes Logo haben als alle anderen
A67-A67 (2023-02-20 17:46:19+00:00): Reverted due to deletion of correct information. See also https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132799504
Baloo Uriza (2023-02-20 18:57:43+00:00): If this is Michigan speed limits, why are the bounds over Oklahoma?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132801294
luschi (2023-02-20 17:34:48+00:00): grazie. ho sbagliato io
NieWnen (2023-02-21 10:38:22+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1086439573
Zostało proposed:building=yes
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-04-22 14:02:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135228709, 135225625 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to fictional edits.
abdul_4ts (2023-02-21 12:14:16+00:00): Hello Ayem, thanks for mapping.
Kindly consider tagging your edit as "building"="yes"
Your current tag ("landuse"="residential") is not very appropriate for building feature. Thanks and happy mappy day.
mavl (2023-04-23 16:01:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:58:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
Константин Гам (2023-03-14 10:53:38+00:00): Исправляя ID Issues пожалуйста посмотрите что вы вообще делаете! Автобусный парк в бизнес зоне? Накидывать на него теги не нужно, его нужно удалить.

Также стоит помнить, что некоторые brand теги устаревают и не думая нажимать кнопку "Исправить по бренду" не стоит...
A67-A67 (2023-02-20 17:44:08+00:00): This change reverts https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132801294 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132799504
mavl (2023-04-23 16:09:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:48:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-20 17:45:57+00:00): Most railways marked as "abandoned" were done so in the 1850s, and have been long overbuilt by new developments.
mavl (2023-04-23 16:11:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:48:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:55:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].