piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Udarian (2026-06-11 11:04:03+00:00): What is your source for this, I ask because official county sources have these addresses having a zip code of 33122 not 33147. Also all of the surrounding zip codes are either 33122 or 33126 in OSM, these are clearly not 33147 which is what you changed the zip code to for these addresses. So there is something off here. 

Happy mapping,
Udar.
joost schouppe (2026-06-30 14:34:27+00:00): Bedankt! bxl-forever heeft dit verder aangevuld zodat het duidelijk is dat het enkel Juni-September "open" is
ieguy3 (2026-06-11 06:33:56+00:00): https://cppenterprises.org/commercial-services/real-estate/filming-locations/

this is the schools real estate arm and franchises to rsi for filming
ieguy3 (2026-06-11 06:36:07+00:00): https://www.cpp.edu/maps/?id=1130#!m/299992
ieguy3 (2026-06-11 06:46:04+00:00): https://www.cpp.edu/news/content/2023/04/cal-poly-pomona-foundation-alters-name-to-reflect-expanded-responsibilities/index.shtml
Tomas Straupis (2026-06-11 09:52:49+00:00): Mokyklos informacija ne ant pastato, o ant gimnazijos bendro ploto, kur yra amenity žyma.
nevw (2026-06-13 08:13:26+00:00): This is an invalid multipolygon needing a fix.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20964580#map=19/-28.125617/153.472354
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=153.47247&lat=-28.12570&zoom=19
Joel Koen (2026-06-16 02:47:00+00:00): Thanks, fixed in changeset/184117265
demon_box (2026-06-11 08:11:43+00:00): Ciao ilMog ho visto che hai aggiunto alcuni tags a questa sterrata
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/203816705/history#map=17/45.695042/10.275375
ce n'è però uno che non mi torna:
width=1
una sterrata larga 1 metro non può essere, mi fai sapere?
Grazie!
ilMog (2026-06-11 08:42:04+00:00): Ciao, la vecchia strada in alcuni punti  circa a metà del percorso si è scavata nella roccia ci può passare al massimo un piccolo quad, sarà larga 1,5m. Non capivo come segnalare che anche con un panda 4x4 non si passa più in alcuni punti.
demon_box (2026-06-11 08:55:40+00:00): ah ok chiaro ho capito la situa
in questi casi meglio taggare x difetto cioè:
- 1 fuoristrada può percorrerla tutta? (NO)
- 1 mtb può percorrerla tutta? (SI)
quindi la modifico in path con largheza minima 1m
grazie e BuonMapping!
m_fuhrmann (2026-06-11 19:09:24+00:00): Hi! Wenn es um Spielplätze geht, gerne mehr mappen.

Im Fulda Wiki steht einiges dazu.

Und wir haben nun diese Karte. Fulda ist die Hochburg der gut gemappten Spielplätze.

https://spieli.eu

Hier wird erklärt wie die Datenqualität zustande kommt:
https://mfuhrmann.github.io/spieli/user-guide/#data-quality-colours

Viele Grüße
Marcel
cascadianstarlight (2026-06-11 07:14:13+00:00): It's actually 1801 D St (got it right on the shop tags tho)
felipeeugenio (2026-06-11 14:12:33+00:00): Hola. En ese terminal se toman y dejan pasajeros? o es el patio donde se estacionan y cargan combustible?

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183956818
Vicente_Estate (2026-06-13 14:08:20+00:00): Hola, es donde se estacionan los buses y comienzan los recorridos, pero no hay gente que espere allí, así que cambié la etiqueta.
felipeeugenio (2026-06-14 12:43:54+00:00): Buena, gracias
alexey_zakharenkov (2026-06-11 15:20:57+00:00): Здравствуйте.

Теперь вы не удаляете (и правильно) большой полигон landuse=residential, накрывающий всё село или существенную её часть, но при этом всё ещё пытаетесь обводить деревья на придомовых участках полигонами с тегом landuse=orchard, в итоге у вас получается наложение лэндъюзов. Если вы удалите внешний большой landuse, то потеряете тип землепользования на большой территории. Если будете пытаться обводить на частных участках отдельно дом как landuse=residential, грядки как landuse=allotments, сад как orchard, то получите детализацию, не подходящую для OSM и не удовлетворяющую определениям этих тегов.

Остановитесь.
Реdактор (2026-06-11 17:35:01+00:00): Добрый день, мне на местности виднее
Реdактор (2026-06-11 17:35:25+00:00): У меня на юге России люди выращивают фруктовые сады
Реdактор (2026-06-11 17:35:51+00:00): Я живу в этом районе, и рисую так как вижу эту местность насквозь
Реdактор (2026-06-11 17:37:11+00:00): Я знаю лучше, мне с земли виднее
Реdактор (2026-06-11 17:37:46+00:00): И это не придомовые деревья, это полноценные сады
Реdактор (2026-06-11 17:38:46+00:00): Не всегда возможно отобразить тот или иной объект так как строго написано в методичке, идя по местности я вижу фруктовый сад, вижу участок, и конечно я занесу этот тег именно ьак
Реdактор (2026-06-11 17:40:28+00:00): И нет, нет никакого нарушения наносить фруктовый сад на жилой территории, нигде это не запрещено
Реdактор (2026-06-11 17:42:08+00:00): Прошу, если у вас в вашем регионе условия и сама местность другие, не нужно пытаться всех подстроить под одну гребёнку, я ещё ни разу буду опираться на статус местного и говорить что мне виднее, и точка.
Реdактор (2026-06-11 17:42:54+00:00): На юге такой сад на участке это в порядке вещей
Реdактор (2026-06-11 17:47:35+00:00): И да пожалуйста, может повторюсь, но прошу, не стоит вмешиваться если не знаете региона, не знаете города, окрестностей, и вахтёрить не надо, в том числе, то что уместно в Москве, в Сочи может быть иным. Всё.
Реdактор (2026-06-11 17:50:21+00:00): Уж прощу прощения, я без наезда, но когда такое случается откровенно подгорает
alexey_zakharenkov (2026-06-11 20:26:43+00:00): Это полноценные сады?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1528400345
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1528400365
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1528400339
Они по площади сравнимы с жилым домом на участке.

То, что сады на смежных частных участках на спутниковом снимке визуально сливаются в один приличный по размеру полигон, не делает местность для проживания людей (landuse=residential) садом.
Реdактор (2026-06-11 20:31:50+00:00): Да это полноценные сады, но опять же, здесь чуть ли не каждое домохозяйство имеет свой сад с разными культурами, в числе садов и виноград, а вообще, снимки тут не самые четкие, поэтому на них ориентироваться не стоит.
Реdактор (2026-06-11 20:33:33+00:00): Здесь снимки скорее как вспомогательный инструмент, со снимков виден сад, а на местности там поле, или огород, или наоборот, было поле на снимке, а засеяли сад с фруктами, осторожнее с этим надо быть мда
Реdактор (2026-06-11 20:38:14+00:00): Тут впринципе любая огороженная территория примыкающая к участку и использующаяся для выращивания фруктов это сад, будь то маленький или большой, проблема в том, что в ОСМ нет отдельного тега для обозначения Сада с плодовыми деревьями на участке с жилым домом, есть гарден но в контексте города Сочи и самого тэга это было б очень притянуто за уши конечно, да.
mavl (2026-06-13 14:40:13+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок добавляет непрямоугольные здания, хотя на спутниковом снимке они прямоугольные. Например:  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1528400334  
  
Не знаю, есть ли в редакторе Vespucci команда "Сделать углы прямыми", но она есть в других редакторах (iD, JOSM).
Реdактор (2026-06-13 17:30:31+00:00): Добрый день, с геометрией могут быть небольшие проблемы признаю
Реdактор (2026-06-13 17:32:06+00:00): Я в Vespucci  просто больше разбираюсь нежели в ID JOSM в этих двух редакторах проще делать сложные геометрии зданий может, ну а веспучи это так
Реdактор (2026-06-13 17:32:48+00:00): А так насчёт геометрии да, поправлю
NieWnen (2026-06-11 10:21:24+00:00): Jakie jest źródło tych zmian?
Tomek | Yanosik (2026-06-11 10:31:01+00:00): w śladach gps ruch tylko w jednym kierunku
NieWnen (2026-06-11 10:41:28+00:00): Ok, 
bo na reszcie inwestycji wczoraj dalej były znaki pozakrywane workami. Akurat byłem przejazdem przez Obrońców, tylko na Daszyńskiego nie zerknąłem.

Natomiast kostka na jezdni i smoothness=excellent to niespecjalnie. Lepiej nie dawać więcej niż smoothness=good (w szczególności jeśli to nie jest bez fazy) + tam to nawet nie była chyba wymieniana.
NieWnen (2026-06-13 16:39:51+00:00): Survey z dziś. Od Kościuszki jest co prawda 1-kierunkowa, ale wciąż ze znakiem A-20, ale no są zakazy na wysokości Szczęsnej, więc teoretycznie wjechać się nie da.

Natomiast odcinek od Szczęsnej do Moniuszki jest 2-kierunkowy, od Moniuszki nie ma zakazów – tzn. czekają na odsłonięcie jak na reszcie ulic.
Tomek | Yanosik (2026-06-15 13:41:05+00:00): dzięki za aktualizację.
Nakaner-repair (2026-06-11 07:35:19+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 183947441.
Kovoschiz (2026-06-11 08:21:53+00:00): Remind me what's the reason? Airport Expo Blvd seems to be based on considering together with Sky City Rd E.
vectorial8192 (2026-06-11 11:02:01+00:00): With the completion of T2 work and improvement of Sky City Road (11 Skies), there is no longer any reason to use Airport Expo Bvld to reach Sky City Road East, unless wanting to access local destinations (eg Sky City Marriott). aka it's no longer for through-fare traffic.
Kovoschiz (2026-06-12 08:35:25+00:00): I'm referring to how Airport Export Blvd and Sky City Rd E is forming a corridor between north side and south side. It can also be seen as a loop. 
I'm unsure the `=tertiary` should terminate on Sky City Blvd at Airport Expo Blvd, to have another `=tertiary` forking via 3rd Sky St. Another view is there's a `=tertiary` corridor on the north side between Cheong Tat Rd and Sky City Rd E.
vectorial8192 (2026-06-13 08:14:18+00:00): Good point on the Cheong Tat Road <-> AsiaWorld Expo corridor, that I did not consider. I will just reclass the roads.
Herwescheluc (2026-06-12 07:41:15+00:00): Nochmal ich!

Hier leider ein weiterer OSMOSE-Hinweis: https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/de/map/#zoom=14&lat=50.67854&lon=8.30476&item=9001&level=1%2C2%2C3&loc=13/50.5889/8.44531

Grüße

Andreas
osmviborg (2026-06-11 10:33:40+00:00): In DK, addresses are kept on nodes only; they are imported from an official database and maintained automatically. Please don't touch the address nodes. Thank you.
mavl (2026-06-11 15:28:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183977054 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20801].
amosharper (2026-06-11 10:18:42+00:00): Thanks, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! FYI, the in-browser iD editor you're using lets you square corners of an area by either selecting the area and pressing 'Q', or right-clicking the area and selecting 'Square'. This will give nice right-angles. 

I've tweaked yours, and also corrected house=terrace (a row of terraced houses as a single area) to house=terraced (a single terraced house).

Happy mapping.
mavl (2026-06-11 15:28:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183977054 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20801].
mavl (2026-06-11 15:28:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183977054 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20801].
silversurfer83 (2026-06-14 16:11:22+00:00): Hi :)

I appreciate your new approach. 

Here's my next tip for the team:

You're using the editor iD. So before changing anything find out if there is imagery available that supports the claims. You can do so by toggling the "Map Data" menu on the right hand side of the editor and then enabling all the photo overlays there are (Bing, Mapillary, KartaView,...). There is current imagery at the southwest end of the driveway and it shows a VZ 250 *with* an additional sign. Sadly the resolution isn't enough to read it.

Is it possible to contact the property owner again to find out what the white sign below the 250 says? Could be "Anlieger frei" which would mean that the old tagging of vehicle=destination was correct.

Because, legally now the property owner can't drive through either...

anyways: keep it up. Thanks for changing your approach.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183958513
Access Claims (komoot) (2026-06-16 13:39:39+00:00): Hi,

Thank you for the constructive feedback.

We appreciate you pointing us towards the available imagery sources.

We have already reached out again to the property owner for additional clarification regarding the access restrictions and are currently awaiting further information. In the meantime, we adjusted the tagging to vehicle=destination, as this seemed to be the most appropriate interpretation given the available evidence.

Once we receive more details from the property owner, we'll review the situation again and make any further adjustments if necessary.

Thank you again for your help!
mavl (2026-06-11 15:28:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183977054 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20801].
mavl (2026-06-11 15:28:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183977054 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20801].
Sébastien Pi (2026-06-11 10:21:11+00:00): Salut Mathias,

Concernant la piste, côté sud, ça ne serait pas mieux de relier à https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/243072206 ?
un cycliste qui vient du sud va entendre « tournez à droite » et juste après « tournez à gauche ». Il risque de louper ce 2e virage un peu dangereux vu que la rue parallèle est en double-sens.
Mathias_ADAV (2026-06-11 10:45:22+00:00): Salut Sébastien,

oui en effet, à regarder la photo de plus près, on est pas si éloigné de la route, j'ai corrigé merci! https://panoramax.openstreetmap.fr/?s=fp;s2;p0945cd4c-ddda-42ee-aa57-ba3de14c4032;c160.22/1.87/6;m17.77/50.632844/3.070539;vd;bs;udefault
Sébastien Pi (2026-06-11 12:07:51+00:00): Merci
mueschel (2026-06-17 13:11:02+00:00): Something went wrong here - all these nodes don't have proper tags, but many that shouldn't be in OSM.
mavl (2026-06-11 15:28:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183977054 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20801].
mavl (2026-06-11 15:28:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183977054 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20801].
mavl (2026-06-11 15:28:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183977054 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20801].
woodpeck (2026-06-21 20:42:03+00:00): In https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183887756 you renamed this place from "Димитрова" to "Магістраль", and now to "Мотор". What is your data source for these renamings, and other renamings that you have done recently?
eretyhh (2026-06-23 09:21:46+00:00): Hi! I just wanted to remove communist names of districts, as well as names of districts named after Russian toponyms. Our law about Decolonization prohibits such names for geographical objects
woodpeck (2026-06-23 09:25:59+00:00): OpenStreetMap does not record what some law says; OpenStreetMap records the names used by people on the ground. You can't just go around and invent new names just because you think the old names are against the law! In the future when you change a name, please provide proof that the new name is actually used by the people on the ground who live there.
Coole (2026-06-24 09:12:48+00:00): I mean, i understand the need to rename some names, but they're needed to indicate on the map locations that most local users could understand, so they could orient on the map first and foremost. 
While some renames (like Торпеда) gives people an idea where it is, renaming Димитрова to Мотор or Магістраль confuse people because Zaporizhzhians would understand it as completely other parts of the district. This need at least some discussion with locals, which apparently didn't happenned.
eretyhh (2026-06-24 11:55:24+00:00): So let the locals write new names for the objects. Because Soviet names of neighborhoods, especially in honor of those who carried out repressions, should not be on the map of a city that is constantly being bombed.
mavl (2026-06-11 15:28:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183977054 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20801].
turbopixel (2026-06-11 16:23:55+00:00): Hallo Stadtbahnfan,
es ist schön dass du fleißig an OSM mitarbeitest. Bitte gebe bei deinen Änderungen zumindest einen Kommentar mit an, was genau verändert wurde.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Gute_%C3%84nderungssatz-Kommentare
_zalle_ (2026-06-15 08:24:37+00:00): so kurzzeitige Sperrungen wegen Baustellen bitte nicht als construction eintragen, s. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:construction
mavl (2026-06-11 15:28:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183977054 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20801].
FajrAl (2026-06-11 09:24:07+00:00): Dalam praktik baiknya, geometri batas administrasi tidak menumpang dengan geometri lain –seperti jalan atau aliran air– walaupun jalur itu memang batasnya. Hal ini akan memudahkan dalam pembaruan geometri atau tag dari jalan, aliran air, atau batas administrasinya itu sendiri.

Dalam iD editor, bisa kamu matikan layer Batas untuk sembunyikan batas administrasi.
Herwescheluc (2026-06-12 07:30:27+00:00): Guten Morgen, Alibee!

Hier hast Du einen Warnhinweis übersehen und jetzt ist der passende Hinweis in OSMOSE da: https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/de/map/#zoom=14&lat=50.67854&lon=8.30476&item=1230&level=1%2C2%2C3&loc=15/50.57408/8.52577

Schau bitte nochmal drüber, ich will da nichts durcheinanderbringen. Ist die Rollbahn evtl. sogar überflüssig geworden?

Grüße aus Herborn

Andreas
Herwescheluc (2026-06-14 11:14:31+00:00): Hallo, Alibee,

habe die Rollbahn mit diesem CS (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184089674#map=18/50.574648/8.526818&layers=N) entfernt. Wenn das nicht richtig war, kannst Du ja revertieren.

Grüße

Andreas
FroschForscher (2026-06-21 17:23:27+00:00): Wurde das Gebäude wirklich abgerissen?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183960723
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-12 03:09:16+00:00): Reverted adding a SEO spam POI with a blatant advertising description=* and many malformed tag values in changeset 183996475

https://osm.org/changeset/183996475
aharvey (2026-07-24 02:24:34+00:00): probably used to be more distinguished as a point before they reclaimed all the parklands here
Sergei Amuzinski (2026-06-11 10:00:17+00:00): *Based on Esri World*
ratrun (2026-06-13 02:53:31+00:00): Hello Guido,

can you please check https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/532908952/history#map=19/40.208318/29.058045

something went wrong in your attempt to fix https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183888618#map=10/40.7159/29.0594

The error is gone if I revert both this changeset and changeset/183888618, but this is not the correct way to fix the fix.

thank you
ratrun
gscholz (2026-06-13 05:50:05+00:00): Hi ratrun,
thanks for this hint. After first trying to fix the error, actually my idea was to let it do tho author himself. So obviously I did not revert my changes completely.
But this is done now.
Guido
gscholz (2026-06-13 06:00:32+00:00): Hi ratrun,
I have reverted changeset 183888618 as well. The result seems to be OK now.
Guido
andckmyn (2026-06-11 10:43:28+00:00): Correction: the previous description was inaccurate.
AndyB_66 (2026-06-11 13:14:50+00:00): Po raz kolejny proszę, byś stosował się do zasad komentowania zestawów nazw: osm.wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
grypiomi (2026-06-11 14:56:27+00:00): To tak odnośnie "usunięcie bzdurnej nazwy"😉
"Proszę pamiętać, że twoje komentarze do zestawów zmian pozostaną w bazie danych tak długo, jak będzie istniało OSM, nie należy z nich korzystać, aby dać upust złości na oprogramowanie lub kolegów mapujących, którzy mogliby skłonić cię, aby coś naprawić lub mogą mieć wątpliwości co do źródła danych."
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-12 03:04:02+00:00): Reverted adding a SEO spam POI with an advertising description=*, note=* and image=* and no top-level tags to a building way in changeset 183996364

https://osm.org/changeset/183996364
mueschel (2026-06-17 09:42:00+00:00): Hi,
what does 'common:mg' mean? This tag isn't used in any other place.
VictorIE (2026-06-11 15:20:59+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13685030179/

Should this be a gate, block or just deleted?
streckenkundler (2026-06-11 11:40:54+00:00): Danke.

Siehe z.B. https://bahnapp.online/station/?id=8011079&name=Bad+Saarow

Sven
mavl (2026-06-11 10:25:37+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 183676704, 183811327, 183811539, 183812539, 183812808, 183812912, 183813444, 183814425, 183814680, 183823694, 183824397, 183825636, 183825900, 183906031, 183906163, 183906316, 183906453, 183906596, 183906751, 183906993, 183907254, 183907714, 183910350, 183956649.
deneben (2026-06-12 00:01:26+00:00): Hello! I am a mapper who lives in this neighbourhood and I have been sporadically mapping select areas of it in a very detailed manner for about a year now.
This service road I presume was detected by an algorithm and quality-checked by you before being added, isn't really a "road." This parking lot is more of an asphalt square with only one designated accessible spot and no other painted ones. This service road you have added wouldn't really qualify as parking aisle, is what I'm getting at.
Thanks in advance for replying to this comment and/or reverting the changeset.
Abaluni_Lyft (2026-06-13 07:46:40+00:00): Hello deneben,
Thank you for reaching out, and thank you for your contributions to OSM. My name is Ankit, and I am a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft.
Regarding my edits, I originally added a square-shaped road based on ESRI World Imagery (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1g02fVxOfWk6Za_9-x29-62X_d4HrQAZ1/view?usp=sharing). However, the imagery was outdated, and several parked vehicles in the center of the area led me to incorrectly interpret it as a square parking lot. After reviewing more recent imagery, I could not identify any structured parking spaces or any painted lines as you said.
 I sincerely apologize for this oversight and for any confusion or inconvenience my edits may have caused.
Now I have updated the geometry in this changeset (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184042639) and retained a single way leading to a parking aisle, as active vehicle movement in the area was confirmed through Lyft GPS tracks (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1q3yqTTMmJfxNLy9PMgR07Tch1NDz5dX3/view?usp=sharing).
Regards,
 Ankit
eduardoaddad (2026-07-17 12:22:18+00:00): Revertida mudança pois está fechado essa entrada

Por favor ver a nota que está no mapa.
ieguy3 (2026-06-11 10:50:41+00:00): https://www.cityofmenifee.us/1011/Social-Infrastructure-Projects#tab7f26a270-3a62-43d8-8629-74d7e89035c4_0
NaufalFarras (2026-06-11 16:07:01+00:00): There is. Please stop. See previous changeset's comments
iuvi (2026-06-11 10:52:33+00:00): а почему убрали классификацию? не влияет ли жто на навигатор первостепенная\второстепенная дорога? уступи и т.д.
kubahahaha (2026-07-16 13:17:35+00:00): Coś ci poleciał ten market, skasowany, ale nie wiem - może chciałeś go gdzieś indziej dodać
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13928610985/history/1
Yukiro (2026-07-16 15:52:57+00:00): Rzeczywiście, przegapiłem, dzięki za sprawdzenie :)