piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2023-01-03 19:46:40+00:00): In OSM Nedetland zetten we geen adresgegevens op de gebouwomtrek. Dat is verwarrend. Er zijn al adresnodes (import kadaster)

Je bent al langer mapper, maar hebt nooit onze welkomstmail ontvangen.. Bij deze opnieuw Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
habi (2023-01-04 09:22:21+00:00): Ist das Gebäude denn noch im Bau?
(Also auf den Luftbildern schon, aber in der Realität?)
Wenn ja, dann wäre evtl. ein `building=construction` besser.
SF23 (2023-01-04 18:07:29+00:00): Gebäude steht und Einzug steht im Februar an. Denke fehlen noch Teile des Innenausbau. Insofern ist das Gebäude theoretisch nicht mehr im Bau.
habi (2023-01-04 20:23:44+00:00): Wenn Einzug Februar, dann würde ich das als `building=school` belassen.
MxxCon (2023-01-11 03:36:52+00:00): Hello.
Could you please elaborate what are you trying to map here? Archeological site in the middle of East River?🤨
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130840157
Rom1 (2023-01-03 20:27:47+00:00): Coucou, aurais-tu des photos ce cette sortie permettant de localiser les lampadaires ? Cela me permettrait de compléter l'inventaire de ma communauté de communes https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1pGQ Merci !
cyel (2023-01-03 21:22:11+00:00): Coucou Rom1,
Non désolé je n'ai pas repéré plus de lampadaires que ce que j'ai déjà mis. J'ai tout au plus un ou deux photos où j'en vois.
Rom1 (2023-01-03 21:25:11+00:00): À tout hasard, si tu y repasses, tu penseras à moi stp ;)
kapazao (2025-03-29 08:45:26+00:00): Hola, me he encontrado que en la zona has añadido cientos de noexit=yes incorrectamente a muchos nodos y vías. ¿Cuál es el motivo? ¿podrías revisarlo?

https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/es/map/#loc=11/36.8359/-4.1074&level=1%2C2%2C3&tags=highway&item=3210&issue_uuid=336ad03c-fe9a-0318-a440-0533c81d279b

Un saludo
Dawid2849 (2023-01-04 20:56:36+00:00): Dalej coś jest nie tak z granicą Podborcza - ten budynek i sąsiednie mają adresy Podborcze, a są w granicach Gorajca https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/904795657
Władysław Komorek (2023-01-05 10:09:51+00:00): Poprawiono.
NieWnen (2023-05-10 10:49:34+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1126766904

Wiesz może, czy ta droga łączy się z Polną/Nadbrzeżną?
adamsc (2023-05-10 20:36:56+00:00): Nie wiem, obie opcje wydają się równie prawdopodobne.
kapazao (2023-01-04 15:33:36+00:00): Hello, you have mixed 2 different places here. CAU Granada is not the same thing as the Documentation Center, they should be made in different nodes.
I have fixed it. Regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130841675
mcconner22 (2023-01-03 20:31:38+00:00): Method I was using for reference - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Strava#Global_Heatmap_in_High_Resolution
Since this is allowed for tracing, I'm planning to check the remaining Pandapas trails for any discrepencies.
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-20 17:58:22+00:00): This feature does NOT exist
w1126769389

It has been removed.  Please do not map for a renderer.  It should match what is on the ground.  Other similar bad buildings are being removed.
rivermont (2023-01-06 18:35:31+00:00): Hey InsertUser, what are you aligning to generally? I was going to work the buildings on Andros Is. but the data doesn't match any imagery well
InsertUser (2023-01-06 20:04:45+00:00): For a couple of places I have private traces but elsewhere I try to roughly match whatever data is already there. Alignment does change a bit between imagery updates and unfortunately there are already cases where the roads and buildings are done to different alignment so that's not always easy to do.

A few areas do have Mapillary imagery so those traces can also be useful for a sanity check. Sorry for such a generic response. I haven't had a broad "ground based" source since Strava became difficult to use.
rivermont (2023-01-06 20:30:16+00:00): Sounds good, for now I'll just align to existing good data.

I checked on the Strava discussions out of curiosity and it seems they've pretty much stalled over the last couple years even though we seem to have permission.
mcconner22 (2023-01-03 20:49:14+00:00): Method I was using for reference - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Strava#Global_Heatmap_in_High_Resolution
Since this is allowed for tracing, I'm planning to check the remaining Pandapas trails for any discrepencies.
mcconner22 (2023-01-03 20:48:57+00:00): Method I was using for reference - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Strava#Global_Heatmap_in_High_Resolution
Since this is allowed for tracing, I'm planning to check the remaining Pandapas trails for any discrepencies.
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-20 17:57:05+00:00): Looks like you changed a valid roadway into a golf walking path.  It is clearly a driveway and parking lot and not a golf walking path.

w578651464

This has been corrected.
Hufkratzer (2023-01-04 10:58:38+00:00): Hi,
I am not sure what https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1126774628 is; but if it is a horse racecourse it should be tagged as explained on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport=horse_racing
Ale_Zena_IT (2023-01-04 18:55:47+00:00): Hi,
thank you
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-03-01 12:27:41+00:00): Please figure out a different way to add features to your tgc program without adding fake features to the OSM live map.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-03-01 13:23:24+00:00): Please also remove YouTube videos telling people to add fake features. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Vandalism https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Problematic_mapping/golf
map per (2023-01-04 12:48:06+00:00): Hello dominique lacour,

parts of this edit look quite suspicious. A Monument in the desert (Mapping the location accurate shouldn't be possible with Maps.me) and a Campsite that doesn't appear to be present on aerial imagery and viewpoints quite far away from roads.

@dominique lacour can you please confirm that your additions are really legit and this is not a maps.me trash edit.

I currently tend to reverting this edit in one week.

Best regards
map per
dominique lacour (2023-01-05 10:51:51+00:00): Hi !

There's little details on the map of Saudi Arabia.
I am planning to go there, that's why I add these marks.
It's a compilation of a very recent archeological book I have bought. Names and locations are given on it. I'm quite confident of the quality and accuracy of the information. Its name in french : "Alula, merveille d'Arabie". Authors : institut du monde arabe, Royal commission for AlUla.
Hope that can help,

Dominique.
map per (2023-01-05 21:44:54+00:00): Unfortunately the copy right terms of books almost nerver permit copying data to OpenStreetMaps. Its only allowed to add data verified on the ground or from sources that explicitly allowed data transfer to OSM.

That means that all data you copied from the book needs to be romoved from OSM.

But you didn't only map in Saudi Arabia. Have you been to all the viewpoints you added and verified them on the ground? And does this campsite (1) in GB really exist in this location?

Best regards
map per


(1) https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10303274915
silversurfer83 (2023-01-06 09:51:06+00:00): Hello
sometimes people misunderstand a feature of apps like maps.me. Quite frequently we find uploads to the public database that were meant to be personal notes within the app. Places to visit or visited. Things like that.
It's OK to make these notes based on Books or whatever source you like but please never save these personal notes to the public database of OSM.
Changes to the database of OSM are only allowed using information gathered in person, or using sources that explicitly allow their usage in OSM.
Please keep that in mind in the future, especially when using apps like maps.me, organic maps, ...
To edit the map I'd suggest using a proper editor like the one built into the website on osm.org or maybe Go Map (that's iOS) or vespucci (that's android).

happy mapping
silversurfer83
dominique lacour (2023-01-06 19:32:38+00:00): Hello,
Well it seems that I had made a mistake.
Yes I have used this campsite in UK, BUT it should be a personal mark, note a public one. Please delete it.
What I don't understand, it's how to change this from maps.me. It seems to me, that before, I can decide to put in public domain or not. Now it's seems to be automatic... I don't know why and how to change it.
Thanks for your help,

Dominique.
dominique lacour (2023-01-06 19:53:42+00:00): About others marks in Scotland: yes I go there recently (August 22) and yes they're nice belvederes but there is nowhere to park your car. So I think it's not really a good idea to promote these places. Please delete them from the database.
I'm really sorry for the work I gave you.
If you understand why I had made theses mistakes, and how to change my parameters of maps.me please tell me. 
I will be nice if I can contribute to openstreetmap when I think it's really necessary, but most often just keep my personal marks for myself.
Thanks for all,

Dominique.
map per (2023-01-06 19:57:08+00:00): Yes, editing with Maps.me is really confusing. I tried it my self once and decided that it's to dangerous (can break OSM data) and unpredictable.
If you want to contribute to OSM I would recomend using the ID editor (just go to the osm.org website and klick on edit).

To avoid uploading stuff to the OSM database with Maps.me I would go to the Maps.me settings and remove the OSM account from the app. Without the account data can't be uploaded to osm. 

And for personal nodes Maps.me offers bookmark. But the difference between "set bookmark" and "add a place" is probably easy to miss.

And by the way: There is a furtherdevelopment of Maps.me called OrganicMaps (can be found in the PlayStore). I switched from Maps.me to the new app a year ago.
map per (2023-01-06 20:07:26+00:00): Removed all your accidental additions from the OSM database.
--This changeset was REVERTED--
dominique lacour (2023-01-06 22:40:30+00:00): Before on IOS, there was possible to able/unable access to OSM database. Maybe I'm wrong, but I cannot find how to do it, in Android.
With Maps.me you cannot put a mark if the place isn't define. That's why I define some places... But I doesn't think everyone could see it.
Maybe it's time to change to OrganicMaps...
Thx for your help.
silversurfer83 (2023-01-07 07:41:10+00:00): Hello
Thanks for replying so we could try and help :)
Regarding maps.me and organic maps: according to app analysis, organic maps ist much better for your privacy since it's current version doesn't contain many (any?) trackers and there's no ads. You can even get it from the alternative app store F-droid

Should you consider contributing for real don't hesitate to ask for help. There's chats and forums everywhere (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contact_channels)

Safe travels 
Silversurfer83
BaboucheVerte (2023-09-28 05:17:33+00:00): Privet, 
I deleted all the name=Leleg Yolu you put on the path / track and added those path / track in the Yeleg Yolu hiking relation : https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15297839.

See the wiki for mapping hiking relation : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route%3Dhiking
Happy mapping !
Paka,
map per (2023-01-06 20:07:47+00:00): Removed all your accidental additions from the OSM database.
--This changeset was REVERTED--
StC (2023-01-07 20:14:32+00:00): Hi! please do not remove tag lwn_name when editing nodes that belong to a hiking node network. I'll make the repair.
Cheers,
StC
cehceh (2023-01-08 11:31:13+00:00): Hi StC, 
sorry for this!
It was not my intention to cause harm.
Cheers,
Matthias
StC (2023-01-08 15:09:38+00:00): No problem! node networks are a bit complex, it is easy to break them.
Cheers,

St.
Firefishy (2023-01-11 00:54:52+00:00): Awesome set of additions to OpenStreetMap. Also try https://every-door.app/ which is another great mapping app.
eggie (2023-01-04 08:21:23+00:00): Dag pepper 

Altijd lastig om meer functies te definieren.
De Hotelfunctie stond al p de kaart met naam Ehzerwold op het zuidelijke gebouw. 'k Denk dat deze toevoeging weg kan.

MVG
eggie
silversurfer83 (2023-01-04 18:05:23+00:00): Hallo Geert,

warum meinst du, dass die Namen auf diese Art geändert werden sollten? Die Bezeichnungen hatten in "ref" doch besser Platz, oder nicht?

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130843951
GRi (2023-01-04 21:21:46+00:00): Die Namen werden auf Karten gezeigt. Ref nicht.
Viele Leute kennen nur die Nr. Anderen die Name. Deshalb gibt es viel mehr Information wenn beide auf der Karte gezeigt werden.
silversurfer83 (2023-01-04 21:48:13+00:00): Verstehe den Ansatz. Klingt jedoch etwas sehr nach mapping for the renderer.
Was angezeigt wird und was nicht entscheidet ja die jeweilige Karte. Die wenigsten nutzen die Karte so, wie sie auf osm.org gerendert wird. Und eine Suchfunktion findet idR auch ref=
GRi (2023-01-05 10:35:37+00:00): Ja, die Regel kenne ich natürlich.
Man sollte sich aber die Situation dabei anschauen.
Wenn die Nr. sinnvoll ist, so wie hier, sollte man die auch benutzen können.
Nicht nur in eine Richtung (auffragen).
Es ist wie eine zweite Name.
Wenn ich das (nochmal) weiter untersuche kommt die Nr. aber doch dabei auf spezifischen Ski Karten.
Das ist genau so wie das passieren sollte.
Dann muss natürlich der Ref da sein, aber das genügt dann.
Ref hatte ich auf mehreren Stellen ergänzt.
Die Namen werde ich dann zurücksetzen ohne Nr.
Germini (2023-01-04 19:46:52+00:00): Hallo wies1, sieh mal hier: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:parking:lane der Tag "parking:lane" ist veraltet, man soll stattdessen diesen hier verwenden: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Street_parking
Schöne Grüße Germini
wies1 (2023-01-07 08:57:16+00:00): Hallo,
danke für den Hinweis. Muss mir das noch näher anschauen. Werde es auch an den Entwickler von Streetcomplete weitergeben.
Gruss
wies1
Layft Greater (2023-01-03 21:57:00+00:00): admin_centre
yasslay (2023-01-20 11:50:53+00:00): Hello!

Why did you delete the junction name area for the roundabout?

Kind regards,
yasslay
Nathan_A_RF (2023-01-20 14:22:53+00:00): My mistake, I must have forgot to redraw it after amending the ways of the roundabout.
yasslay (2023-01-20 19:30:06+00:00): It's alright, I'll add it it back in. No problem!
EdoBoo (2023-01-15 13:14:59+00:00): Ottimo lavoro! Era una bella mancanza
highflyer74 (2023-01-04 06:03:23+00:00): Moin!

Sei so nett, keine historischen Dinge zu OSM hinzuzufügen. Weiter Informationen dazu gibt es hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Mappe_keine_historische_Ereignisse_und_ehemalige_Objekte%E2%86%99

Danke!
silversurfer83 (2023-01-04 09:05:32+00:00): Wikipedia ist, mWn, auch keine geeignete Quelle da die Lizenz nicht mit OSM kompatibel ist
Sven Frotscher (2023-01-04 12:49:44+00:00): Außerdem ist in relation/15077195 ganz Berlin und nicht nur Westberlin ausgenommen.
user_8101879 (2023-01-04 15:05:09+00:00): You mix East-Berlin (with the role admin_center) and this relation of 5 new states.
But East-Berlin was the admin_center of RDA (before 1990), it is not the admin_center of these new landers (today, I mean after 1990).
There is no admin_center for this region because this region is not an administrative element but a histocal collection of 5 states.
highflyer74 (2023-01-04 15:31:11+00:00): Nach Durchsicht sind es wohl drei involvierte Changesets. Bitte nichts an den Daten ändern, um einen Revert nicht unnötig zu erschweren.
--------------------------------------------------
After checking, there are apparently three changesets involved. Please do not change anything in the data so as not to make a revert unnecessarily difficult.
highflyer74 (2023-01-04 16:59:33+00:00): Drei beteiligte neue Relationen entfernt, da ein Revert in mehrere Konflikte lief (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/130874878)
------------------------------------------
Three involved new relations removed, as a revert ran into several conflicts (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/130874878)
ChrissW-R1 (2024-09-08 21:55:25+00:00): Siehe meine Ausführung in Changeset #130838981 (https://osm.org/changeset/130838981)
lono0000 (2023-01-03 22:59:52+00:00): trampelpfad, nicht solarstrom!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:05:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
Hugoren Martinako (2023-01-04 23:40:39+00:00): Buenas,

Has eliminado el nodo poblacional de Ferral del Bernesga: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/348087190

Esto nodos son necesarios para la identificación, clasificación y enrutamiento de las entidades de población. Lo he vuelto a recuperar puesto que, entiendo, se trata de un error.

Saludos
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:09:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:06:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:03:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:03:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:03:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:04:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:06:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:07:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:08:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:09:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:06:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:02:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:03:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:03:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:04:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:10:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
CurlingMan13 (2023-01-04 14:50:20+00:00): Was the bank demolished and then a new building was built over it?
PaulTheMan (2023-01-05 21:07:10+00:00): Yes.  The project site, which is located at 1750 W. Olive Ave., was a U.S. Bank for years before being made available for sale in 2019. Fast food restaurant chain Raising Cane’s purchased the property in September of 2019, which was followed by a request for a building permit in May of 2020.
https://myburbank.com/raising-canes-construction-lawsuit-allows-restaurant-to-open-grants-trial-against-the-city-to-begin-in-march/
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:08:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
PT-53 (2023-01-04 08:46:49+00:00): Hallo SPG2LD,
was war den die Quelle für Deine Einträge?
Fragende Grüße
und noch ein
Gutes Neues Jahr

PS: 
Für Fragen / Anmerkungen / Rückmeldungen bitte diesen Änderungssatz aufrufen und in das leere Feld unterhalb Diskussion als neuen Kommentar eintragen.
PT-53 (2023-01-10 08:32:28+00:00): Hallo SPG2LD, 
ich würde mich noch über eine Antwort freuen.
Grüße

PS:
Für Fragen / Anmerkungen / Rückmeldungen bitte diesen Änderungssatz aufrufen und in das leere Feld unterhalb Diskussion als neuen Kommentar eintragen.
PT-53 (2023-01-16 08:18:17+00:00): Hallo SPG2LD,
ich warte immer noch auf eine Antwort von Dir, wo Du die eingetragenen Daten her hast.
Es ist so, daß wir nur Daten nach OSM übernehmen dürfen, wenn die Daten-Lizenzen dies erlauben.
Siehe hierzu im OSM-Wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Copyright

Grüße

PS:
Für Fragen / Anmerkungen / Rückmeldungen bitte diesen Änderungssatz aufrufen und in das leere Feld unterhalb Diskussion als neuen Kommentar eintragen.
Dinamik (2023-01-04 21:33:48+00:00): Здравствуйте!
Прошу Вас прекратить удаление данных о входах и вестибюлях Петербургского метрополитена:
1) Вы удаляете информацию о принадлежности к транспортной сети
2) Вы удаляете информацию о вестибюлях
3) Вы вносите неоднозначность в данные базы.

Пожалуйста, обратите внимание, что номера, являющиеся частью названий станций, номера вестибюлей и номера лестниц - разные понятия.

Основная проблема Ваших правок - после них база начинает содержать меньше сведений.