piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
silversurfer83 (2025-07-31 15:11:34+00:00): Hello David,
glad, you're still providing the community with your updates. Thank you.

I'm just checking in to ask if you're going to "fix" your, hopefully, preliminary updates using an editor better suited to the task.

save travels
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169692454
David White professor (2025-10-15 03:26:37+00:00): I think I fixed all these
ToniE (2025-07-29 20:55:45+00:00): Hi,

this was a wrong edit.

There are two steps around there, one is leading from level 0 to level 0.5 (from west to east) and the other (longer one) from level 0 to level -1 (from west to east).

According to your edit, both end on the same level (0.5 != -1), the way from north to the south.

Please be careful with such edits without local knowledge.

Toni
BCNorwich (2025-07-30 05:18:13+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetap.

That's three houses, not just number 8. I've now mapped the houses so the addresses can be added properly

Regards Bernard.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-05 16:00:16+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13035314997/history has shop = accessories that was added in this edit
shop=accessories ? What kind of accessories are sold here? Fashion accessories? Car parts? Gun accessories?

Maybe use shop=fashion_accessories for clothing accessories, shop=car_parts for car accessories or other shop=* instead - see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=accessories
NieWnen (2025-07-29 23:29:00+00:00): Dlaczego zmieniasz w adresach litery na wielkie? To niepoprawne zmiany.
bartgron (2025-07-30 08:04:25+00:00): Dlaczego niepoprawne?
NieWnen (2025-07-30 17:50:21+00:00): Ponieważ na warstwie adresów gugik, czy e-mapa są małe litery, a nie mamy żadnej zasady w OSMie, która narzuca zmianę liter w adresach na wielkie, więc nie ma powodu, żeby to robić jak jest zgodność źródłowa.

Niestety, ale jest trochę takich przypadków w których różnica wielkości liter wyznacza unikalność adresu i tak może być np. 1a i 1A jako dwa oddzielne adresy.
bartgron (2025-07-30 20:23:07+00:00): Dzięki za informację, w takim razie nie będę tak robić
grzegorz75jan (2025-08-03 20:34:17+00:00): Powinno być MediaMarkt czy Media Markt ?
Dimitar155 (2025-07-30 06:42:20+00:00): Hi Itay Grudev,

The ramps are in fact connected to the motorway (i.e. the asphalt reaches the motorway). The guard rail is placed in such a way since the perpendicular road is not connected to anything yet.

The ramps are tagged with access=no so no router would tell you to use them, even when they are connected. If you really want to show that these ramps are not accessible, you can add barrier=guard_rail to the respective nodes of the ramps. The guard rail is quite visible on Esri imagery.

The noexit=yes tag would be appropriate for roads that have no exit at all for any mode of transit (like the south node of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/673172027). In this case, there are dirt roads that reach part of the unused perpendicular road.

Happy mapping,
Dimitar
Itay Grudev (2025-07-30 10:57:56+00:00): I didn't know about that tag. Thank you very much. Is the change reverted or do I need to do anything about it?
Dimitar155 (2025-07-30 11:07:44+00:00): It's not reverted yet, I can revert it if you want.
Itay Grudev (2025-07-30 11:35:28+00:00): I tried reverting it with JOSM. Could you please verify this is correct (I requested someone to review my changes there):
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169715593

If not feel free to revert it yourself.

Thank you!
Dimitar155 (2025-07-30 12:00:48+00:00): Everything looks good!
ivanbranco (2025-07-29 21:45:28+00:00): Ciao Matteo,

per favore non aggiungere il numero del sentiero come nome delle way che lo compongono. Il numero è già correttamente taggato come ref della relazione: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/190778
wildmaps (2025-07-29 22:09:02+00:00): Ciao, ho già rimosso il name sbagliato (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169694569)
wildmaps (2025-07-29 22:07:41+00:00): Ciao @matteobott, grazie mille per il tuo contributo! 😊
Solo una piccola nota: su OpenStreetMap si cerca, dove possibile, di evitare abbreviazioni nei tag come name=*, per facilitare la comprensione e l’uniformità dei dati.

Se hai dubbi su questi aspetti o vuoi discuterne con altri mappatori, sentiti libero di scrivere qui o di chiedere nel forum OSM o nel canale Telegram italiano. Grazie ancora e buon mapping!
NeisBot (2025-07-29 22:37:00+00:00): Hi vianobollo, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Added Spanish name tag to a feature, likely a church, and made minor adjustments to surrounding nodes."

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish #AIgenerated
vianobollo (2025-07-29 22:43:51+00:00): Thak you. Cemetery & Church
meisoof (2025-07-29 22:29:52+00:00): *meant to say King Edward instead of Marmont
NeisReview (2025-07-30 06:04:54+00:00): #NameCheck

Hello and welcome to OSM.

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits, particularly those concerning the names you've added or modified.

Some of these names caught my attention as they are quite unique or a bit unusual. Could you please confirm if these additions were intentional or if they might have been added mistakenly?

Looking forward to your response.

Thank you!
mstrbrid (2025-07-31 09:17:48+00:00): This is deliberate as the bridge is currently demolished and under re-construction. Prior changeset comments and an existing map note explain the situation.
tinoma (2025-07-31 11:27:18+00:00): Fair enough I’m new and did not realise, thank you for changing it back
NeisReview (2025-08-03 09:43:29+00:00): Same again?

See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169894541
donmac703 (2026-07-09 04:29:35+00:00): The comment "make networks match" typically means that the network of a route master and the network of the routes related to that route master don;t match.
NieWnen (2025-07-30 21:50:16+00:00): Słup zmienił błędnie lokalizację oraz boiska zostały połączone z linią średniego napięcia. Poprawiłem.
DurgeshSinghChouhan (2025-07-29 23:40:28+00:00): Spelling Mistake. Correct Comment: repositioned POIs
bartgron (2025-07-30 21:29:43+00:00): Czy przesunięcie bankomatu było celowe czy nastąpiło przez przypadek?
Casthaluth (2025-07-30 22:43:06+00:00): Bankomatów nie ruszałem, więc mogłem przez pomyłkę.
Casthaluth (2025-07-30 22:43:46+00:00): Przesuwałem mapę i czasem kursor stawał dęba i przesuwał, co zauważyłem to anulowałem zmiany..
bartgron (2025-08-04 16:15:31+00:00): Dobra to wycofam ten bankomat
stoerte (2025-07-30 11:51:36+00:00): Hey, ist das beabsichtigt, dass in der Humperdinckstraße keine Häuser mehr eingezeichnet sind? :D
LachlanTansey2009 (2025-07-30 04:28:30+00:00): Is the Wurundjeri Way extension open?
PeachyOne (2025-07-30 20:00:14+00:00): Why have you changed https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27324513/ into barrier=yes, a tag that doesn't exist, therefore breaking the connection on the road? I am reverting this change to the previous version by ika chan.
ika-chan! (2025-07-31 16:34:58+00:00): Hello, I think Mirditor22 reported that the new roundabouts at the future junction 15 of the A3 are open and original course of the EO15 is restored. I have fixed the area to reflect the change, and used better tags for the old detour.
Pontificator Extraordinaire (2025-07-30 01:36:33+00:00): I'm not sure why this changeset box is so large. The only affected area should be around the OK County Detention Center
Udarian (2025-07-30 02:00:37+00:00): a few issues here, first of all as it is right now this is just a point with out an amenity of other identifying tag, this is an issue as those are required to make an item in OSM useful. The closest I can think of is a non profit office but that is iffy. 
Second, I doubt that such a feature would be located in the middle of a school.
Third, you certainly should not have attached it to the vertex of the running track area.
You also have several dragged nodes in this commit.

The question becomes what is this feature supposed to be, because I have a feeling OSM doesn't currently have a tag for this, but we may be able to come up with something if you provide more info as a response.

Happy mapping,
Udar.
Udarian (2025-07-30 20:24:27+00:00): please respond
CAM-Gerlach (2025-08-01 09:17:17+00:00): Flagging as SEO spam per discussion; fixed by Udarian in changeset #169796175
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169697932
Colin Smale (2025-07-30 11:56:03+00:00): Just curious... Where did you find the postcode boundaries (not the centroids)?
UtterClutter (2025-07-30 15:31:48+00:00): I use OSMUK Cadastral Parcels to describe property boundaries.
The rest is done by deduction and through my work as a courier.
CAM-Gerlach (2026-05-27 22:34:19+00:00): Fixed invalid opening hours and at least attempted to improve address tagging (still needs major fixes by someone who understands the local addressing scheme and conventions; there weren't enough local examples or street names to be able to determine what is correct) in changeset 183277924

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183277924
chinook17 (2026-07-04 23:51:05+00:00): Salut,
Normalement quand on ajoute une piste cyclable en site propre, il faut enlever cycleway track, ou encore mieux mettre cycleway separate, sur la route adjacente sinon elle apparaît en doublon.
Glassman (2025-07-31 21:57:02+00:00): Looks like you added a waterway=drain to the building. Fortunately someone else removed it. 

Also, when adding trees, sometimes it is easier to draw a polygon around a group of trees and tag it as natural=wood.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169698561
NeisBot (2025-07-30 03:01:14+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-07-31 19:28:53+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/169787196
Kees 59 (2025-08-05 11:55:40+00:00): Hi,
The nodes 12964464218, 12964464220, 12964464223, 12964464224, 12964464256, 12964464257 and 12964464258 are tagged with "building=*=". They are all part of a building way. Might this tagging be a mistake?
Axolotling (2025-08-13 04:23:22+00:00): Hey Kees, thanks for pointing this mistake out. The extra, invalid tags have now been removed.
RandomLipeño (2025-07-30 03:53:39+00:00): Note: correction to https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157824955
SherbetS (2026-07-09 15:09:27+00:00): Hello,
Please use man_made=mast + tower:type=communication
not man_made=communications_tower
Object: way/1034031133
See:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dcommunications_tower

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dmast

Thanks,
James
Minh Nguyen (2026-07-09 17:00:44+00:00): That would be my preference as well, but this was a compromise because another mapper insisted on deleting anything I tagged as man_made=mast and man_made=antenna. Feel free to weigh in:

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/colocated-broadcast-antenna-structures-nodes-inside-an-area/122626
pots253 (2025-07-30 06:53:14+00:00): Thanks, I was just about to reverse it, only to find you already have
Joske1020 (2026-03-18 15:36:08+00:00): waarom overlappende natuurreservaten?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1418572845
Tom Ameye (2026-03-19 15:23:55+00:00): Ik had dat wat aangepast in functie van de percelen die in eigendom zijn van het ANB. Welke percelen eigendom zijn van het ANB kan je zien op https://belevingskaart.natuurenbos.be/?zoomtoobject=175&findinlayer=18
Voel je vrij om het aan te passen als je betere info hebt.
Joske1020 (2026-03-22 20:28:04+00:00): hier
https://gis-extern.natuurenbos.be/arcgis/rest/services/Belevingssite/Belevingssite_detail/MapServer/export?F=image&FORMAT=PNG32&TRANSPARENT=true&LAYERS=show%3A18&BBOX={bbox}&BBOXSR={wkid}&IMAGESR={wkid}&DPI=90
Joske1020 (2026-03-22 20:28:58+00:00): ga bij achtergronden (in de iD editor) bij aangepast (idk wat het in het engels is) en vul die url in
trial (2025-07-30 07:59:05+00:00): Bonjour,
Pourquoi avoir changé ce mini-giratoire en giratoire ? C'est un mini-giratoire (les PL peuvent rouler dessus si besoin) sauf si ça a changé récemment.
hugdo (2025-07-30 12:11:28+00:00): Je n'arrivais pas à connecter le giratoire aux routes adjacentes dans les relations route=bus sur JOSM. Marquer le carrefour en giratoire plutôt que mini-giratoire permettait de contourner le problème.
trial (2025-07-30 13:31:06+00:00): A l'oreillette on me dit que tu es entre de bonnes mains ;-). Il est toujours préférable de demander de l'aide (sur forum.openstreetmap.fr par exemple) : il est probable que le problème a déjà été rencontré par d'autres contributeurs qui sauront proposer des techniques ne dénaturant pas les objet (un mini-giratoire est, et doit rester un mini-giratoire, dans certains cas passer en giratoire traversable, pourquoi pas).
TheNightRider (2025-07-30 05:07:31+00:00): Accidentally didn't get get this in the changeset comments:
Update addr:housenumber per station website.
fortera_au (2025-07-30 05:20:20+00:00): Hi, oneway=no is implied by the lack of a oneway=yes tag, there isn't really a need to tag it unless it's a single lane road.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169701136
TinPetreković (2025-07-30 10:26:20+00:00): Reverting because the maxweight for the bridge was wrongfully altered #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169712563
Dante_geo04 (2025-08-06 06:22:23+00:00): 1.- Esto no es una playa (¿porqué clasificar todo como playa erroneamente)
2.- En el nombre colocar únicamente "Pista de Salto", el resto está de más, pues ya esta mencionado en todo el recinto.
Corregir los errores en la edición
NeisBot (2025-07-30 05:30:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-07-31 19:28:19+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/169744349
TinPetreković (2025-07-30 10:42:19+00:00): Reverting because of an accidental node creation #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169713208
hayashi (2026-02-24 03:33:48+00:00): 「int_name」を削除するのはやめてください。 「int_name」は国際表示名として現地に示されているデータです。 「int_name」は英語とは限りません（このことは osm.wiki/JA:Key:name にも書いてあります)。 ギリシャでは「int_name」に翻字が使われたようですが、日本ではそのようなことは行われていません。ギリシャのローカルルールを日本に適用しないでください。日本でも「int_name」を「name:en」に機械変換したいのならコミュニティの合意を得てください。

また、「name:en」は「name:ja」を英語にしたものを入力してください。略称を入れたり、省略したり、一般名詞をローマ字で表記したりしないでください（このことは osm.wiki/JA:Key:name にも書いてあります)。

「name:en」と「int_name」が一致したとしても「int_name」を削除しないでください。現地表記が「英語」なのか「ローマ字」なのかわからなくなります。

現地に表示されたローマ字表記の「int_name」は、重要な値です。特にOSMでは「name:en」は他の言語（日本語も含む）より重要な基準言語になっていますので osm.wiki/JA:Key:name の規約に従って世界基準を意識した編集が必要になります。「int_name」を単純に「name:en」に置き換えることはできません。（単純置き換えは あなたが示したosm.wiki/JA:Key:name に違約することになります）

まとめますが * 「name:en」は規約に従った値を入力すること * 「int_name」は削除しないこと 上記2点は守ってください
Tomas_J (2025-08-14 09:33:18+00:00): Zdar, prečo si vymazal moje Footway=Sidewalk tu?:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/640539566/history#map=19/48.218922/19.828378&layers=D
Leo Slager (2025-07-30 22:39:55+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Carlavissers (2025-07-31 05:30:21+00:00): dank je!
NeisBot (2025-07-30 07:09:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description
NeisReview (2025-07-31 19:27:01+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/169707674
dadavid (2025-07-31 14:13:31+00:00): Hi, 

wie meinst du private Hobbywerkstatt? Ist denn von außen zu erkennen, was es ist? Ein Name ohne POI Tagging ergibt ja irgendwie nicht so viel Sinn. 

Viele Grüße und happy mapping

David
NeisBot (2025-07-30 07:42:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-07-31 19:26:35+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/169743390
Leo Slager (2025-07-30 22:57:59+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Leo Slager (2025-07-30 23:03:10+00:00): Hallo enshine,

Alle begin is moeilijk.
Dat plein staat al op de kaart.
Met highway=pedestrian 
en area=yes

dat is dus dat grote grijze vlak op de kaart en het heeft ook nog een naam, Gustav Mahlerplein.
place=square doet dus helemaal niets op de kaart.
Ik zal het weer verwijderen uit de database.
TIP:
Probeer je eerst in te lezen in de wiki voor je begint te mappen.
rempshaener (2025-07-30 15:55:59+00:00): Hallo,

du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Da war einiges „schief“, das hat ein anderer User bereits behoben.

Viele Grüße
buy_osmand (2025-08-02 05:53:51+00:00): 😳👍
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2025-10-07 17:41:23+00:00): 例如 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1418599617 这样的学校，operator如果要写也应该是主管机构，而非校长的名字。另一方面也是因为人事调动可能会很频繁，osm不是一切信息的收集场所。另一方面也是出于osm不记载隐私信息的考虑。

在 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172970685 中已经回退
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169706346
woodpeck (2025-07-30 08:09:01+00:00): Data imports in OpenStreetMap require prior discussion. Please do not upload road marking data without discussion your data sources and tagging plans with the community beforehand. This import is being reverted. (DWG Ticket#2025073010000115)
NeisBot (2025-07-30 08:27:47+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-07-31 19:25:44+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/169707859
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2025-10-07 17:54:34+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13036887102#map=19/30.286727/107.462565 这种恶搞他人的内容在OSM是绝对禁止的，因为可能涉及到他人隐私问题，请不要这样做，这样做继续下去是可能造成被封号的
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169707300
djykr (2025-10-07 19:50:04+00:00): 收到，此标记非恶意形式创建且已被其人知晓，将在稍后删除
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2025-10-07 20:31:57+00:00): 我看到的时候就删掉了，而且不管是不是恶意形式，当事人知情不知情，都是不要这样作的，哪怕就是当事人知道这件事而且点头了（甚至觉得哎呀我被画到地图里挺好的），那它也是不符合osm对于记载内容的约定的。可以搜一下 osm best practice
KingVik (2025-07-31 01:14:05+00:00): Hi Alexis Giraud-Courtney (CoMaps),
Thank you for your updates on the changeset. However, I’ve noticed that some of the tags aren’t fitting properly several places tagged as building=residential are not actually residential. Most of these issues appear to stem from edits made during the 2023 EveryDoor campaign, which extended into or some of the ESA Hub countries. A number of new contributors added nodes incorrectly as building edits, and this has led to significant data quality challenges across the hub.

I’ve already addressed part of the issue in Rwanda, but some inconsistencies remain. I think it’d be best if we discuss this further in person. That way, we can agree on a more refined approach moving forward.
Andrew512 (2025-07-31 22:25:37+00:00): That's a maintenance billing the tracks do go through
JIDB (2025-09-25 16:38:24+00:00): Bonjour,
Des aires de bivouac, très bien! Par contre le contour suffit, il n'y a pas besoin de mettre un point en plus. Sinon c'est comme si il y avait 2 campings au même endroit.
Pour info: il y moyen de trouver facilement ce genre d'entrées doubles vie la site
https://camping.openstreetmap.de/osmoscope/
notmyproblem1 (2025-11-30 13:47:54+00:00): indoor=yes?
AwFi (2025-11-30 14:08:11+00:00): a cosa ti riferisci?
notmyproblem1 (2025-12-01 13:02:17+00:00): al percorso a zigzag vicino a "Ferrovia Campoleone - Nettuno", vicino al parcheggio Piazzale Pietro sada
AwFi (2025-12-01 13:04:33+00:00): Se vuoi aggiungi pure, ma non mi pare fosse indoor, più che altro covered.
notmyproblem1 (2025-12-01 16:13:44+00:00): beh, non è neanche mappato covered=yes
AwFi (2025-12-01 23:22:51+00:00): me ne sarò dimenticato, se vuoi modificare fai pure
notmyproblem1 (2025-12-02 10:57:26+00:00): beh non so quale sia covered=yes e neanche dove sia indoor=yes, potrei chiedere a un mio amico, ma poi diventa un sospetto sockpuppet
Supaplex030 (2025-07-30 12:17:04+00:00): Lieber Benjamin Steuber, herzlich willkommen bei OSM! Und vielen Dank für die Eintragung der QPK. Eine Anmerkung dazu: Ich habe den Eintrag etwas korrigiert, sodass die Stelle nicht als "Rathaus" (amenity=townhall), sondern als Büro des "Gesundheitsamt"s (office=government + government=healthcare) verzeichnet ist.

Beste Grüße
Alex
velomeloman (2025-07-30 18:51:27+00:00): В surface = bad ошибка. Что имелось ввиду?
Raa39 (2025-07-30 19:14:13+00:00): Smoothness bad, не то написал
Raa39 (2025-07-30 19:17:45+00:00): Исправил
user_5359 (2025-07-30 11:53:10+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Your business isn't part of the street. I revert your change set.
mbrozzo (2025-07-30 09:21:29+00:00): For the reviewer(s): I have been there with a small group. We would have needed to climb down the wall, but we deemed it too dangerous without the possibility to secure ourselves. We ended up circumventing it by going off-path down a nearby slope which connected to the base of the vertical climbing section.
Aleksandar Matejevic (2025-08-04 12:35:25+00:00): Hi blinin, 
I have a question about deleting Prishtina relation on admin_level=8. Why? Yes, there is one on admin_level=6 which is representing Municipality of Prishtina, but the one on admin_level=8 should remain to represent the city itself. What is your thought about this?
blinin (2025-08-04 13:35:08+00:00): I actually fixed it right here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169956228#map=12/42.6529/21.1609. Thanks for letting me know.
Aleksandar Matejevic (2025-08-05 06:56:05+00:00): Thank you for fixing this. Happy mapping
kapazao (2025-08-06 08:42:09+00:00): Hola, por favor fíjate en los elementos ya existentes y no añadas duplicados.
La gasolinera ya existía como área.
Un saludo