piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
os-emmer (2024-09-25 18:22:24+00:00): Ich bin über diesen Hydranten gestolpert, da "emergency"="fire_hydrant:status=not_available" ein so nicht richtiger Zusammenschluss von zwei Tags ist. Vermutlich wolltest du eigentlich emergency=fire_hydrant und status=not_available setzen. Dann wären es aber 2 verschiedene Tags und nicht so ein zusammenschluss. Der Tag status=* wird nicht unbedingt ausgewertet, sodass ein Datenauswerter hier unter umständen einfach nur einen Hydranten sieht. Stattdessen wäre hier die Verwendung eines Lifecycle-Präfix sinnvoller:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
Also so etwas wie
removed:emergency=fire_hydrant
für einen Hydranten der entfernt wurde. Da solltest du dann aber noch irgendwie kenntlich machen, warum du das Objekt nicht einfach entfernt hast. Das kann z.B. mit note=* passieren. Sonst kommt jemand vorbei und löscht den Hydranten einfach.
Auch das end_date ist hier in dieser Form fehl am Platz. Es suggeriert hier, der Hydrant hätte im Juni aufgehört zu existieren.
Ich hoffe ich verwirre dich nicht und ich will dich auch nicht abschrecken. Ich habe gesehen, dass du noch nicht so viele Bearbeitungen durchgeführt hast und der Anfang ist immer schwer.

Wenn der Hydrant jetzt wieder zugänglich und nutzbar ist, dann sollte er wieder als
emergency=fire_hydrant
water_source=main
getagged werden. Und wenn du nähere Infos zu dem Hydranten hast kannst du ja mal über
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:emergency=fire_hydrant
gucken und vielleicht noch was ergänzen.

Kannst du dir das noch mal angucken und etwas anpassen? Ich gucke auch gerne noch mal drüber :)
JayTurnr (2024-12-04 21:07:32+00:00): I armchair added some details about lane counts down at the junction with Bury Street and A10 - Seeing as this work here isn't in Bing or any satellite imagery, I'd appreciate it if you, or someone else local, could validate my work nearby as it appears I have been working of older data.
george1201 (2023-11-30 21:39:49+00:00): Die Zugangsbeschränkung "vehicle=private" zusammen mit "motor_vehicle=customers" verwirrt mich. Das hieße, dass ich mit dem Auto zum Parkplatz durchfahren dürfte, mit dem Fahrrad aber nicht.
Scout Jens (2023-12-01 04:34:40+00:00): die Eigenschaft "vehicle" hattte ich übersehen - ist gelöscht. Danke
VictorIE (2023-12-02 00:22:42+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1227790560

I'm wondering does this short stretch actually exist?

Mapillary suggests yes, but (newer) Bing suggest no.
NoelB (2023-12-04 09:47:34+00:00): it doesn't, I have removed it.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-11-30 14:30:23+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11385751796
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11385751795
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3180363108
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/165776831
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/165776837

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
arjunaraoc (2024-01-01 01:52:28+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144627227
NorthCrab_upload (2023-11-30 14:50:41+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4448336461
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/446302521

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eteb3 (2025-08-29 21:00:38+00:00): Hi Falsernet,

I'm just looking at the Airfield Cycleway relation, and saw you'd added cycleway=crossing to way 455388707.

Is that quite right? There is no crossing there for cycles: they have to join the carriageway. There is a crossing for pedestrians, which I'll add in a moment.

Happy mapping.
topolusitania (2023-11-30 16:13:28+00:00): Aproveitamento Hidroeléctrico de Figueiral Com base nas fotos de 2021 foi feita a relocalização das tubagens e edificio da central. Levanto a questão, qual a origem dos dados ?
topolusitania (2023-11-30 16:20:55+00:00): Reservatório R6 - Carvoeiro Foi colocado um edificio, classificado como central hidroelectrica.
PedroMTG13 (2023-11-30 16:22:01+00:00): https://e2p.inegi.up.pt/
topolusitania (2023-11-30 16:37:50+00:00): Esta licença é compativel com a utilização no OpenStreetmap ? (Não sou especialista em licenças)
Licença para utilização do e2p
O propósito principal do e2p é o de apoiar quem se interessa pelas energias renováveis em Portugal. A informação constante neste sítio, apesar de recolhida com a preocupação do máximo rigor, não vincula nem a APREN nem o INEGI nem deverá ser utilizada para qualquer fim além daquele a que estritamente se destina: apoiar quem se interessa pela evolução da capacidade geradora de eletricidade em Portugal recorrendo às fontes renováveis como fonte de energia.

Este trabalho está protegido pelos direitos de autor vigentes e licenciado com uma Licença Creative Commons, Atribuição-NãoComercial-SemDerivações 3.0 Portugal (CC BY-NC-ND).
dpolovinkin (2024-05-27 12:48:39+00:00): hehe, I already has a discussion back then in Telegram channel, but if you reverted - can you say then - all those addresses here https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2383736818#map=19/44.45145/26.10248 - which exact buildings do they refer to? Asking seriously, for now it looks like almost completely worthless data...
dpolovinkin (2024-05-27 12:49:02+00:00): just an example... and there are so much stuff there in Bucharest as far as I remember
dpolovinkin (2024-06-11 23:18:05+00:00): hi, I see you are making changesets so you saw my comment, can you please answer?
alexnder (2024-06-12 03:52:30+00:00): I don't think you remember the telegram talk fully; we then explained to you that address numbers in Romania don't get assigned _only_ to buildings, but, in fact, they get assigned to the land plot underneath a building by an authority ( https://www.ancpi.ro/ ) . And most of the times, the address numbers are physically placed on the fence of the land plot, where the gate to the property is...that's why you see all those rows of numbers . 

So, does this answer your question?
alexnder (2024-06-12 03:56:51+00:00): https://www.bing.com/maps?cp=44.451718%7E26.102312&lvl=20.7&pi=-17.2&style=x&dir=173.9
dpolovinkin (2024-06-12 09:15:50+00:00): ah, now I remember yeah! thanks a lot for the info again! :))
MxxCon (2023-12-01 05:29:29+00:00): Vandalism reverted.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144648314
MushroomMan (2023-11-30 15:25:17+00:00): Correction: Source used was Bing aerial imagery; Strava
DaveF (2023-11-30 15:27:11+00:00): Reverting this changeset
ManuelB701 (2023-12-02 17:31:43+00:00): Hallo,

du hattest für den shop-Key aus Versehen shop=clothing=women angegeben anstelle von shop=clothing und dann clothing=women angegeben. Das habe ich mal korrigiert, beim nächsten mal aber bisschen vorsichtiger sein. ;)

Grüße
Manuel
Senihtu (2023-12-04 14:24:30+00:00): Danke. 
Wie man merkt, übe ich noch und kämpfe etwas mit den Editoren.
Ich hätte erwartet daß id und josm bei so etwas beim Hochladen meckern.
Wie findet man solche Fehler?
ManuelB701 (2023-12-04 17:41:35+00:00): Das habe ich lediglich beim Vorbeischauen bemerkt, JOSM wirft hier keine Fehler ab (lediglich für "shop=yes", weil es so ungenau ist). Allerdings gibt es in JOSM Vorlagen (u.a. bei den Merkmalen, über den Tags), wo solche probleme verhindert / -mindert werden können.
osmoj (2023-12-02 03:52:30+00:00): Hallo, wenn es das Impfzentrum nicht mehr gibt, sollten neben dem Namen auch die anderen zugehörigen Tags entfernt werden:

- healthcare=centre
- healthcare:speciality=vaccination
- vaccination=covid19

Sofern es den Aldi wieder gibt, sollte `old_name=` in `name=` und `disused:shop=` in `shop=` geändert werden.

Viele Grüße
baprischka (2024-03-09 14:54:19+00:00): Bonjour, le POI existe déjà : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7460813603
Je supprime celui-ci en recopiant les infos sur le POI existant.
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2024-03-11 08:27:50+00:00): Bonjour,

Merci de votre alerte
Cordialement,

L'Equipe DB
murble (2023-12-01 11:01:56+00:00): why did you make this mass change without discussion?
DaveF (2023-12-01 14:55:28+00:00): Why do you think it's not discussed?
yasslay (2023-12-01 15:27:05+00:00): Hi,

A discussion tag wasn't attached to the changeset, so it's reasonable to assume that this mechanical edit wasn't discussed.

May I ask where you discussed the mechanical edit? Thank you!

Regards,
DaveF (2023-12-01 15:51:47+00:00): I believe there was more than one. I didn't partake in those to discuss the deprecation of various tags into emergency=water_rescue, but that's what's happened. That's what this changeset implements.

Talk-GB & Talk-ie (if my post has been authorised yet) contains an ongoing discussion in how to ensure there's the correct number of objects to correspond with the RNLI database & other independent rescue services. 

PS Just because a discussion wasn't declared it's /not/ "reasonable to assume that this mechanical edit wasn't discussed."
DaveF (2023-12-12 19:31:54+00:00): Hi

Did either of you partake in the  discussion (I don't recognise your user names) or were you just out to finger-wag?
yasslay (2023-12-12 19:41:02+00:00): Hi,

Personally, I didn't, however, I was interested in seeing the discussion that took place at Talk-GB or Talk-IE to see what was going on. That being said, discussions relevant to the mechanical edit should be included in the changeset tags per the Automated Edits code of conduct. I don't like to seek out or create drama, so I'm sorry if this has been particularly bothersome.

Relevant documentation:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct

Best regards,
kortgodt (2023-11-30 18:04:49+00:00): Du har tømt Tinbæk Søen (16772469) der har permanent vandspejl for vand!
osmviborg (2023-11-30 20:16:37+00:00): Du har brugt: Tinbæk Søen & Tinbæk Sø.
https://udinaturen.dk kalder den Tinbæksøen
Hvad hedder vandpytten?
Ismet Azizi (2023-11-30 15:56:58+00:00): Këshilli Nacional Shqiptar- Albansko Nacionalno Vjece
bxl-forever (2023-11-30 17:19:55+00:00): Hello,

You added indoor=yes to this clock but it looks like this is an outdoor clock on the front of the building, as this 360° picture shows.
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=273533241781574

What do you think?
Alain_CEMEA (2023-11-30 20:17:18+00:00): You're absolutely right. The clock is outside. I don't know how to change it... I'll look into it.
bxl-forever (2023-11-30 22:08:06+00:00): I’ll fix it.
danieldegroot2 (2023-11-30 20:36:31+00:00): Hey Jimmy KK and welcome,

Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap!

Your changes look okay. :-)
- Missing spaces in the field names can happen, nothing to worry about.
- It is preferred that areas (i.e. farmland) are not connected to lines/ways (i.e. road). They can be connected to hedges and fences, but are better kept seperate so they are easier to maintain. (also it creates an extra large box around your changes as you can see)

Your changes can be viewed here:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=144630494

If you haven't yet, read more here
- Beginner's Guide
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide
- Good Practice
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice

For your information, the most important rule is to not copy data from Google Maps or any other proprietary / copyright content, without explicit permission. For the imagery in the editor applications we already have permission though.

If you need help mapping, have any questions, or just want to chat with other mappers, you can join the (local) community here:
https://openstreetmap.community/?map=53.26662,-7.78496&zoom=4.65
(left click on the country / place of interest, a list of contact channels will appear on the right side)

Regards,

Daniel
danieldegroot2 (2023-11-30 20:50:24+00:00): Oh, and as I mentioned you can map a hedge as a line. You can specify the width as "width=...", but we usually don't add it.

If you want to map large areas of shrubs or similar you can look at this page
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:natural
You can always ask other mappers if you are unsure.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-11-30 16:20:22+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11385924084

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
lyctkel (2023-11-30 17:04:32+00:00): Hoi goedegazelle,
het was niet mijn bedoeling om een onzinbewerkingen te maken.
De winkel was in kaart gebracht met shop=gold.
Op de eigen website staat dat hier goud, zilver etc worden gekocht. 
Mij lijkt shop=gold_buyer specifieker, zie ook de wiki 
(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=gold%20buyer?uselang=en).
De bewerking is daarom geen fantasiebewerking, maar is gebaseerd op de wiki. 
Het kan worden beargumenteerd dat zilver, munten etc. hier natuurlijk ook worden gekocht. 
In dit geval is shop=gold echter niet specifiek genoeg.
Ik heb een passende beschrijving toegevoegd aan de tag.
Veel groeten,
lyctkel
lyctkel (2023-11-30 17:09:29+00:00): Hoi goedegazelle,
het was niet mijn bedoeling om een onzinbewerkingen te maken.
De winkel was in kaart gebracht met shop=gold.
Op de eigen website staat dat hier goud, zilver etc worden gekocht. 
Mij lijkt shop=gold_buyer specifieker, zie ook de wiki 
(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=gold%20buyer?uselang=en).
De bewerking is daarom geen fantasiebewerking, maar is gebaseerd op de wiki. 
Het kan worden beargumenteerd dat zilver, munten etc. hier natuurlijk ook worden gekocht. 
In dit geval is shop=gold echter niet specifiek genoeg.
Ik heb een passende beschrijving toegevoegd aan de tag.
Veel groeten,
lyctkel
DressyPear4 (2023-12-04 23:24:46+00:00): Discuta com a comunidade local antes de alterar a classificação de vias
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144630712
YoungHiro45 (2023-12-01 22:48:05+00:00): Correction: Source used was Bing aerial imagery
mga_geo (2023-12-02 06:05:19+00:00): Bonjour,
La way/1227811463 double sur une grande partie (est-ouest) la way/96367941. Le raccordement de cette nouvelle way sur le croisement avec l'ancienne suffit, il n'y a pas besoin de retracer une voie entre ce croisement et la Ville-ès-Bruyères.
Marc
silversurfer83 (2023-11-30 18:52:13+00:00): Hello there :)

I sincerly hope you enjoyed your time around Willingen.

Even though you seem to be a seasoned contributor I would humbly like to remind you of these two articles in the wiki, the first of which I think is rather important when working on this project.

Thanks for considering and safe travels
silversurfer83

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144631152
trallalallalaa (2026-03-18 14:42:57+00:00): Hi,
The service way 1227813005 looks like an error – its one end connects to TF-21 and the other end is "in the air" above Avenida Nelson Mandela which is not on the same level with TF-21 at this point (passes below). Could you check?
LateNightTone (2026-03-18 15:54:14+00:00): Hi, yes it's correct – you can see on GRAFCAN imagery that it is on top of the tunnel section of Avenida Nelson Mandela, and ends directly above where the latter enters the tunnel. If it's an issue with the proximity of the service road end-node and the node where the tunnel/non-tunnel sections join, it would be normal to add noexit=yes to the service road end node. But in case it makes the situation clearer, I've just extended the service road by one more node, to the gate beside the adjacent building, since it does provide access to this.
eggie (2023-11-30 18:40:49+00:00): Dag Diederik... Is er dan nog wel een bakkerij, want die tag heb je laten staan?
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=144631506
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-11-30 21:00:17+00:00): shop=bakery heb ik verwijderd
MVG
eggie
Dawid2849 (2023-11-30 16:57:48+00:00): *obok Frampola
Waaslander (2024-05-08 11:33:31+00:00): Dag Ruben,

Ik vroeg me af of er een ruimtelijke dataset bestaat van dergelijke pijpleidingen in België?

Mvg,
Gpoilvet
Ruben Van de Velde (2024-05-08 12:01:54+00:00): Niet dat ik al gevonden heb; in dit geval was de pijpleiding (in aanleg) toevallig duidelijk zichtbaar op de luchtfoto's
DressyPear4 (2023-12-04 23:23:59+00:00): Discuta com a comunidade local antes de alterar a classificação das vias
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144632108
ernestove (2023-11-30 17:07:43+00:00): perfecto
Jose Luis Infante (2023-11-30 22:10:46+00:00): Moltes gràcies per la vostra edició!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144632212
welzheimerwald (2023-12-04 23:51:22+00:00): Warum wurde hier der Weg 1201736627 am Voggenmühlhöfle gelöscht?
ernestove (2023-11-30 17:13:55+00:00): perfecto
BCNorwich (2023-12-02 07:53:03+00:00): Hi, You've mapped the gardens over all the building which isn't correct, there's no garden where the buildings are situated. You could make multipolygon relations so that the buildings are inner areas of the garden. Thus the garden is not across the building area.

Regards Bernard.
Frans S (2023-12-01 15:19:13+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
A remark. When you map rectangular buildings, please square each one with the  Q key when selected. You missed several buildings.
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2023-12-08 11:05:43+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. However, pay more attention to squaring of buildings.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144633190
Fizzie-DWG (2023-12-09 03:31:09+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15468
Frans S (2023-12-08 15:42:12+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Mappings not accurate enough.
Buildings not squared.
Often shadow line included in your mappingn=.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144633336
Jakka (2023-11-30 18:31:40+00:00): dubbele toevoeging verwijderd
Jakka (2023-11-30 18:32:47+00:00): chiro dubbele toevoeging verwijderd
Jakka (2023-11-30 18:35:32+00:00): Heis sport dubbele toevoeging verwijderd
Jakka (2023-11-30 18:37:53+00:00): dubbele naamgeving ofwel op building=school ofwel op gebied amenity=school best niet op beiden dubbele naamgeving voor zelfde ?
Frans S (2023-12-05 16:20:21+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
A remark.
When you want to map a spot which seems to be a building, check if you see any shadow, this proof that it is above groundlevel. otherwise, don't map it.
Best regards
Frans S (2023-12-31 10:40:17+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. However, not all buildings were squared.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144633997
Frans S (2023-12-05 13:55:47+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Buildings often not squared
Buildings not accurate mapped.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144634013
DressyPear4 (2023-12-04 23:23:01+00:00): Discuta com a comunidade antes de alterar a classificação de vias
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144634134
Frans S (2023-12-05 14:51:26+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This and others of the same day are reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Buildings not always correct mapped. (extentions)
included the shadow of buildings.
Buildings not squared.
Please be more accurate !
Quality prevails above quantity .


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144634214
blacx (2023-12-02 13:37:40+00:00): d'on treus aquestes rutes i perque les estas fent passar pel mig d'un tros?, que imagino que es privat
opendcc (2023-12-01 04:43:01+00:00): Hallo, da bei der Mauer: geht da noch die Straße von der Kita bis zur MÜ6 durch oder ist das unterbrochen. Momentan kreuzt die Mauer die Straße - in der Karte ..

Servus