piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
divaddivag (2026-01-13 09:57:33+00:00): Hé oh, il ne faut pas lâcher l'affaire! Ce n'est pas une question de spécialistes mais de faire les choses dans le bon ordre et simplement pour que cela reste fluide et plaisant sur le long terme. Un truc que j'avais en tête depuis longtemps est de partir du fichier Sirène à l'échelle du 14: ce matin 454 fermés sur 8364 soit ~5%. Cela se fait bien sans trop de déchets, regardes ce que j'ai fait et surtout dis-moi si il y a des choses qui te posent problème. Comme les BaL, adresses tout va rentrer dans l'ordre gentiment dans les semaines qui viennent. Pour visios, je ne peux pas avant 19h15-30. Bonne journée D
NeisBot (2026-01-17 15:20:05+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13429997875 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "ISCOM Nice école de communication"
---
Par exemple, une version plus neutre et factuelle de ton texte pourrait être : "ISCOM Nice école de communication"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-25 07:36:32+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177671087
(No visible changes after review)
spiregrain (2026-01-20 15:59:15+00:00): Hiya - welcome to OSM!  These changes look OK from this armchair.  But If I was to visit the new roads in person, would they be going through a construction site?  Are the street names shown on local signage?
tsr3 (2026-04-13 21:55:30+00:00): Hey sorry for the late reply. You won't be going through a construction site specifically, just around it. Construction is currently happening within Curlew and Tern House and down the checkered road (which will eventually become a useable road). As for the signs, there is nothing put up yet.
spiregrain (2026-04-14 07:57:48+00:00): Hi there - I've actually been to have a look in person now (back in February) so I've made some updates to reflect what it was like back then.   (Also adding the construction site at the south-east end of Hinewood Rd).  If you know the area - does it look OK now?   If you notice that more of the construction is finishing, please do update things or let me know.
spiregrain (2026-04-14 14:49:40+00:00): Also! If you see any sign of them connecting Crossness Road to Handley Page Road (bridge needed?) that'd be well worth adding!
Kovoschiz (2026-01-13 07:08:39+00:00): Please don't merge and connect `=steps` with `=footway` in a right-angle. There should be an L-shape turning corner being either stairs or flat.
Kovoschiz (2026-01-13 07:10:28+00:00): (Similar to not connecting `bridge=` directly)
NeisBot (2026-01-17 15:20:08+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13116122706 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Koi Day Spa and Massage on Soi 57 in Hua Hin"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-01-25 07:45:05+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/177602349
AntMadeira (2026-01-23 19:58:01+00:00): Hello, foss-contributor28.

In this changeset you altered admin boundaries.
To avoid this in future edits, please deactivate frontier layer in iD (Press U -> Map Elements) and never connect other elements to boundaries or alter them.
If you need help with this, don't hesitate to contact me.

Regards,
António Madeira.
foss-contributor28 (2026-01-27 01:19:51+00:00): Hello, António.

My bad I though the administrative lines would follow the terrain land that's why I connected them ... I'll be more careful from now on. Hope you were able to revert my mistake. Thanks.

Best Regards.
eggie (2026-01-12 12:41:16+00:00): Dag Emile  Je deurbellen hebben huisnummer 42?  Waarom is dat?
Hoe kunnen deurbellen sowieso een huisnummer krijgen?
Ze corresponderen niet met het daadwerkelijke  huisnummer.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=177135364

Graag reactie
MVG
eggie
Emiledj (2026-01-12 16:08:20+00:00): Daar is iets fout gegaan met het copy-pasten. Ik zie dat je het hebt veranderd. Bedankt!
eggie (2026-01-12 16:12:39+00:00): No problem...
literan (2026-01-12 18:48:12+00:00): 👍
Frans S (2026-01-22 16:12:48+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Very vague objects without shadows are mostly not buildings. At best, abandoned ruins. All these mappings are no buildings. I removed them.
Best regards
eggie (2026-01-12 12:36:39+00:00): Dag Tijmen,

Is er wel een bezoekadres, want normaliter nemen we geen onlineshops op in OSM?
Het bedrijf moet ook van buiten herkenbaar zijn. 
MVG
eggie
tijmenvanr (2026-01-12 12:50:05+00:00): hi Eggie,

Er is een bezoekadres. Dit is het aangegeven adres. 

Mvg,
Tijmen
eggie (2026-01-12 12:51:47+00:00): Oke.. duidelijk.
eggie (2026-01-12 12:53:25+00:00): Evt format phone aanpassen. Dat begint in osm met +31
tijmenvanr (2026-01-12 12:54:47+00:00): zal ik doen
IvanaŠokčević (2026-02-05 09:37:17+00:00): Removed hgv designated tag because it was tagged based on DMAMPO map; fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177556957
kabelhaai (2026-02-18 01:16:48+00:00): Bedankt om dat ineens recht te zetten.
CurlingMan13 (2026-01-16 19:05:14+00:00): Were all the driveways permanently removed?  Or is this temporary due to construction?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177136183
RVandy (2026-01-16 19:08:59+00:00): US 31 is becoming a limited access highway.  216th Street has been blocked and is no longer accessible either from the east or west.  226th street has been converted to an overpass only with no access to US 31.   thanks for your review.
Frans S (2026-01-22 15:37:47+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
Issues found on your mappings
A: Inaccurate mapping. (far oversized)
E: Buildings not squared or rounded.
H: Included a yard of clearing. You mapped  complete yards as 1 building. Each building need to be mapped individually.


Explanation can be found in this document which  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177136250
Frans S (2026-01-22 15:38:31+00:00): check this webpage to see the adjustments I had to make.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=177566474

Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177136250
Patchi (2026-01-13 06:29:53+00:00): Bonjour ArnaudProf,

Ajouter son tracé (de randonnée ?) par-dessus des voies existantes n'a pas d'intérêt puisque des voies existent déjà !

Je vous invite à découvrir les tutoriels pour bien commencer avec OpenStreetMap:
https://learnosm.org/fr/beginner/start-osm/
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Guide_du_d%C3%A9butant
Je retire votre long "highway=path" puisqu'il y a un tas d'incohérence suite à l'ajout de ce chemin qui dans plus de 90% recouvre une voie/un chemin déjà existant. Si jamais vous voyez avec votre trace un chemin qui n'existe pas encore, n'hésitez pas à la rajouter mais cette fois dans les règles de l'art (voir tutoriels au-dessus).

Merci et bonne continuation,

Patchi,
NeisBot (2026-01-17 15:20:11+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/2813122054 v6

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Entreprise de cybersécurité et infrastructure IT"
---
Par exemple, une version plus neutre et factuelle de ton texte pourrait être : Entreprise de cybersécurité et infrastructure IT
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-25 07:36:40+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177671090
(No visible changes after review)
rarad74 (2026-01-12 13:51:53+00:00): Hi. For the future - if you want to add again roundabouts, you must add a specific tag : junction = roundabout.
dblnz (2026-01-12 13:54:58+00:00): Thanks, Will have that in mind.
Jordi MF (2026-01-12 15:06:55+00:00): Tal y como se observa en la imagen 2 de esta página de la wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmotorway_link) el punto de salida de la autopista debe de situarse casi lo más cerca posible de la línea continua que impediría salir de la autopista.
Aquí también hay una página con una imagen similar: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lane_assist/Examples/Motorway_exit
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2026-01-19 22:12:03+00:00): Lanes should not be represented with separate ways
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177137839
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2026-01-19 22:19:42+00:00): reverted
KikeTM (2026-01-20 00:26:25+00:00): Los viales separados con línea gruesa NO SON CARRILES.
Satyajit Ray (2026-01-12 15:09:31+00:00): ¡Hola! Vivo cerca de Mar de Cristal y he visto que has editado la conexión de Metro en esa estación. ¿Estás seguro de que existe una vía de tren conectando las líneas L4 y L8 de metro? Me suena que están a diferentes alturas.
Hugoren Martinako (2026-01-12 15:11:45+00:00): Buenas de nuevo, ¿puedes explicar qué estás haciendo con las uniones entre lineas? Aporta más información al respecto, a priori, esos segmentos de vías que estás añadiendo, no existen (no hay esa conexión entre vías).

He visto que has escrito en el foro (https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/cambio-de-las-etiquetas-de-los-ferrocarriles-de-via-estrecha/138279/16) y se está hablando de tus cambios en el telegram de la comunidad española (https://t.me/OSMes)

Un saludo
Clostar (2026-01-12 15:21:24+00:00): Hola!

Sí, en el metro de Madrid faltan muchas interconexiones entre líneas (p.e L9-L10 en Pza Castilla, la que he editado en Mar de Cristal). Este mapa detalla todas las que hay: https://mateocorral.com/o/MVMM

Otro error es que las cocheras de Canillejas dan también servicio a la línea 5, y las vías de conexión aparecían con toperas en vez de continuar en túnel (es lo que he editado, lo siento si he cortado algunos nodos).

Mi idea es mapear bien el metro de Madrid, agradezco cualquier ayuda o sugerencia.

Gracias
Satyajit Ray (2026-01-12 18:10:10+00:00): Hola Clostar. La idea de Openstreetmap es representar sobre el mapa lo que existe físicamente, es decir, añadir las líneas tal y como son. Si no existe una vía férrea uniendo las líneas 4 y 8, no se debe añadir. Si conoces la estación, sabrás que ambas líneas están a diferentes niveles. Si pinchas en las vías existentes, verás que la L4 está en la capa -2 y la L8, que la cruza por debajo, en la capa -5. ¡Has añadido una vía férrea que no existe en la capa -1, por encima de las otras, atravesando el vestíbulo de acceso! Si quieres editar el mapa te recomiendo que entres al canal de Telegram, y ahí te aclararán las dudas: https://t.me/OSMes
NeisBot (2026-01-12 13:26:16+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your changesets and noticed that the cumulative count of your recent edits (2 changesets) shows that 304 of your last 339 changes were deletions. This is quite an unusual proportion, so I wanted to check with you.

Could you please confirm whether these deletions were intentional or if they may have occurred by mistake?

#DeletionsCheck #Cumulative
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?uid=23686849
xayax (2026-01-12 13:52:13+00:00): Thank you for the review. I just deleted some doubled forest fragments. I think that was ok. It wasn't a mistakte. Thank you.
Hugoren Martinako (2026-01-12 15:01:43+00:00): Buenas, has dejado una geometría por Hortaleza muy rota. Echa un ojo cuando puedas.

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=177137965&zoom=14&lat=40.47410&lon=-3.67275
Frans S (2026-01-22 15:47:32+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
His object.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1466467107/history#map=19/13.792097/21.621004
is not a building. You see both on the inside as well as on the outside a shadow.
This is probably a cattle yard.
Best regards
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2026-01-19 22:19:34+00:00): Reverted
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177138152
IvanaŠokčević (2026-02-19 12:41:23+00:00): Removed unnecessary source:hgv tag (the sign is visible on streetside), fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178006243 #OptimoRoute
eggie (2026-01-12 14:36:04+00:00): Hoi  Het lastige is dat een gebouw altijd in rendering boven ligt.
Je zult de tuin dan nooit zien. 
De truc die ik dan gebruik is het gebouw onzichtbaar te maken door er building :part van te maken en dan de werkelijk gebouwen in te kekenen mbv de BGT.
Ik pas even wat aan. en maak van je grasveld een tuin.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-01-12 14:53:11+00:00): Ik heb het anders opgelost. De tuin ligt als een inner in de outer van het gebouw.
Straks paar keer CTRL-F5 om de rendering te versnellen.
Je binnentuin is nu een leisure=garden. Het is nog steeds jouw tuin.
eggie (2026-01-12 14:54:06+00:00): We noemen dat een multipolygoon relatie.
Frans S (2026-01-22 10:26:58+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
You identified and mapped most buildings. However, you did not square the rectangular buildings with the Q key !
Please square each of them while still selected hitting the Q key .
Best regards
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2026-01-13 14:53:21+00:00): Merhaba. MapWithAI aracı her zaman binaları ayırt edemiyor. Hatalı verileri sonradan düzeltmek, verileri sıfırdan yüklemekten daha zor olabiliyor. Bu nedenle MapWithAI kullanacaksanız, lütfen binaları tek tek kontrol ediniz.

Örneğin bu değişikliğinizde, uydu görüntülerinden ayrı binalar olduğu anlaşılan bazı binalar tek bina gibi çizilmiş. Birkaç örnek:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1466473049

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1466473052

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1466473059

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1466473062

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1466473065

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1466473066

Lütfen MapWithAI önerilerini kontrol etmeden onaylamayınız. İyi günler.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-01-27 20:52:10+00:00): Hello!

You used
place=islet;
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28096452/history

Have you maybe meant
place=islet
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
SekeRob (2026-01-13 05:56:46+00:00): Hi, is that building 1170 meters high, as that is the value you entered, taller than the Burj Khalifa of 828. Maybe you read it somewhere in mm and. meant.11.70 m with decimal point? Also while correcting could you add building:levels which I guess with 12 meter is 2 or 3, class rooms usually higher than regular 3 meters.

Ciao
nickyisonline (2026-01-13 21:51:44+00:00): Hi!,

You're correct, i meant 11.70 with a decimal point. Sorry about that!

- N
rivermont (2026-02-06 22:03:59+00:00): What's the source for the trail name? I've never seen anything signed in that area before
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-01-27 20:52:08+00:00): Hello!

You used
place=islet;
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/665155955/history

Have you maybe meant
place=islet
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
felipeeugenio (2026-01-12 22:23:45+00:00): Hola. por favor no agregar información privada de personas.

Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177139831
bxl-forever (2026-01-12 14:26:03+00:00): Je pense qu’il y a une erreur ici : les bâtiments tracés d’après les plans du cadastre ne doivent surtout pas être redessinés à la main en suivant les images aériennes. Ces images donnent toujours une vision déformée des bâtiments et ne sont pas pérennes car la déformation change à chaque nouvelle photo. Attention à ne pas introduire des données fausses dans OSM, svp.
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2026-01-13 14:54:18+00:00): Merhaba. MapWithAI aracı her zaman binaları ayırt edemiyor. Hatalı verileri sonradan düzeltmek, verileri sıfırdan yüklemekten daha zor olabiliyor. Bu nedenle MapWithAI kullanacaksanız, lütfen binaları tek tek kontrol ediniz. Değişikliğinizde birçok ayrı bina, tek bina gibi çizilmiş.

İyi günler.
egeaero (2026-01-13 15:10:48+00:00): Merhaba belirtilen düzenlemeler uyguland. Uyardığınız için teşekkür ederim.
NeisBot (2026-01-17 15:20:22+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13450394516 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Chalet Liebenstein in Bad Kötzting Bayerischer Wald"
---
Zum Beispiel könnte eine neutralere und faktischere Version deines Textes lauten: "Chalet Liebenstein in Bad Kötzting Bayerischer Wald"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-25 07:36:41+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177671091
(No visible changes after review)
rempshaener (2026-01-12 19:43:03+00:00): Hallo,
bitte künftig die Warnhinweise des Editors beachten. Du hattest hier einige Straßen verschoben und verknüpft.
Ich habe das gerade schon korrigiert.
Viele Grüße
rempshaener (2026-01-12 20:19:08+00:00): Hallo,

zu www.openstreetmap.org/node/13450374959:
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1236714184169799&focus=photo&x=0.2091787192736012&y=0.4780043627803484&zoom=2.315436241610738&lat=48.83123&lng=9.1461987&z=17
Wenn das wirklich 2xA ist, dann bitte wie folgt:
couplings:diameters=A;A
couplings=2

fire_hydrant:position=parking_lot passt hier nicht, das ist fire_hydrant:position=green
ref=ÜH150 bitte löschen

zu www.openstreetmap.org/node/13450374955 
water_source=firmennetz gibt es so nicht, bitte auf water_source=main ändern.

Viele Grüße
eggie (2026-01-12 14:59:25+00:00): Dag Gijsbert.
Om te voorkomen dat dat hele traject voor regulier verkeer gaat routeren heb ik het op access=no gezet met emergency=yes
Frans S (2026-01-25 10:14:29+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
A remark. Be sure that a (round) object is a building and not a tree.
A round hut has a sharply defined perimeter, while a tree is somewhat more irregular.
(I removed 1 here)
Best regards
FajrAl (2026-01-13 02:48:00+00:00): Lahan sawah tidak perlu diberi nama
StC (2026-01-16 17:09:21+00:00): Bonjour,
ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre qui passe par là (visiblement, la modification d'un carrefour qui a ajouté des chemins excédentaires dans l'itinéraire). Je m'occupe de la réparation.
MacDony (2026-01-18 07:14:55+00:00): Bonjour StC,
Ok, merci et désolé
Bonne journée,
Denis
felipeeugenio (2026-01-12 14:50:53+00:00): Nota resuelta #5125805
whb (2026-01-13 14:23:28+00:00): entsprechend kommentiert:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176407201
Niiepce (2026-01-25 13:30:07+00:00): Danke
rempshaener (2026-01-12 20:01:11+00:00): Hallo,
hier nur eine zusätzliche Anmerkung:
Sofern das "SH" für Schachthydrant steht: dafür gibt es fire_hydrant:style=wsh
Viele Grüße
rempshaener (2026-01-12 19:53:19+00:00): Hallo,
wie du bei "warnings" siehst, hattest du hier umfangreiche Verschiebungen von Straßen verursacht.
Ich habe das gerade korrigiert.
Viele Grüße
rempshaener (2026-01-12 19:57:53+00:00): Hallo,
dann eine Anmerkung zu https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13450480896:
- Die Hydrantennummer bitte nach „ref“ verschieben.
- Hydranten sollten nicht mit Straßen, Gebäuden u. ä. verbunden werden. Das lässt sich leicht beheben: im Editor markieren und „E“ drücken – das löst den Hydranten von der Linie.
- water_source=groundwater bei einfachen Unterflurhydrant passt in der Regel nicht.
Viele Grüße
rempshaener (2026-01-12 19:54:36+00:00): Hallo,
die Hydrantennummer gehört in das Feld "ref".
Viele Grüße
silversurfer83 (2026-01-12 21:32:57+00:00): Hi there :)

I don't quite understand what you're trying to map here.

Have you had a look at wiki.osm.org before adding things like "Circular Platform" or "Nitrogen Station"?

it seems like you're misusing name=* as description and you deleted perfectly fine OSM objects to replace them with your versions which is against "Keep the History".

I suggest you swing by the forum to get some input on what you're trying to do at c.osm.org

cheers