piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Stadtigel (2025-10-27 15:49:01+00:00): Hallo aceman444!

Thank you for your message!

Why does not make sense to have bench, table and site on the same node? It is a picnic site and it exists more as one table with more as one bench. If you want create every unique table and every unique bench – please make it! Before my changeset, there was no information about tables and benches. Therefore, I think that my change was an improvement.

The node osm.org/node/13250023819 is not necessary, I apparently created it by mistake.

I drove on osm.org/way/1116848141 and osm.org/way/239014891 three weeks ago and didn't see any prohibition signs. If I overlooked them, please revert the change.

I made most of the changes around the „Hurbanovo námestie“ to allow a continuous routing (for example with https://maps.openrouteservice.org). That's not possible through an "area", so I created „footways“. You can correct the exact location if you have better local knowledge.

The change of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12925875150 was a suggestion from the iD-editor, which I confirmed with the push of a button, and which was then automatically implemented.

The footway osm.org/way/1311898571 went through the hotel building, so I split it and marked the building section osm.org/way/1443955905 as a tunnel with „layer=-1“. „layer=1“ would have been more accurate, because there is a staircase leading up before. But you can change it, if you can do it better.

I hope you understand my changes better now.

With friendly greetings from Stadtigel
aceman444 (2026-04-14 17:19:26+00:00): Thanks for the explanations. Sadly, they confirm many of the changes are wrong and I need to fix them.

There was information on the fast food (cafe) that it has outdoor seating, so that indicated there are benches or chairs around it. You wanted to map them separately, so it could have been done properly.
Also it does not mean it is a picknick place just because there are some benches, but in this case I think you may be right, it is a popular place.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/239014891 , in Slovakia you need to see permission for bikes on footways (not just not seeing no restriction), before you add bicycle=yes. Otherwise bikes can go there, just with walking speed and pedestrians have priority.
Yes in this old town pedestrian zone bikes are allowed on signs at entry to the zone, sometimes it is just a question where the zone ends. There is signage that from Kapucinska bikes can continue along the tram tracks over the bridge. It is unclear if they can go down the footway you tagged. But as it is withing the pedestrian zones, they may be allowed. I'll check it on the ground.

Routing through an area is possible and just because some navigation is not able to do it, it is not allowed to twist data in OSM for that application.
The area at Hurbanovo nameste was missing bicycle=yes as a whole, that may be why navigation was avoiding it. There was no need for a parallel footway on its border having different conflicting tags.
And It also does not explain why you had to connect the footway at Kapucinska onto the pedestrian area when they are separated in reality.

The layer tags in the hotel does not even need to exist, the tunnel goes through the building so they are at the same level. And just because something is "up" (or higher than something else). You may mean 'level' tag in relation to where the objects exist relative to the levels of the building.

And if you do not understand if tag changes proposed by iD are correct, then never blindly click its suggestions. They are known to be often wrong.

I have fixed the problems, but pay more attention next time, thanks.
Tomas_J (2026-04-15 08:48:23+00:00): Hi aceman444,
I routinely draw the 'virtual' footways inside the pedestrian areas beause of the same reason Stadtigel described (to help navigating). Do you consider this an error? I found the wiki article where they specifically recommend this practice (see below). 

Join together the ways leading to a pedestrian area, to enable linear routing engines to produce (possibly less realistic) itineraries that cross the area.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Guidelines_for_pedestrian_navigation#Junctions_between_lines_and_areas

re:
regarding "aceman444: Routing through an area is possible and just because some navigation is not able to do it, it is not allowed to twist data in OSM for that application."
aceman444 (2026-04-15 21:21:51+00:00): Hi, which example in the page are you refering to specifically? The page mostly talks about connecting ways leading to a pedestrian area. It is less clear if they want OSM ways inside pedestrian areas too. Some images show such ways (the green lines), some do specifically do not (the blue lines do not exist, they are routing possibitilies in apps).

Anyway, when you do draw ways inside areas, it is always important to have them the same tags as the area. And that is not what was done here, the author put random ways like highway=footway and highway=cycleway on the edge of highway=pedestrian(+area=yes), thus creating a road with different properties that does not exist in reality. It would be better to actually fix tags on the areas to allow proper routing.

And you can see the original author's idea that areas cannot be routed was false. See e.g.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_bicycle&route=48.147369%2C17.108942%3B48.145174%2C17.104125

OSRM builds a bike route not using the ways the author added. So they were needless and I have removed them since.
Stadtigel (2026-04-17 12:43:10+00:00): Your example (https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_bicycle&route=48.147369%2C17.108942%3B48.145174%2C17.104125) uses the tram tracks (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/256253552; https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30108064; https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/411125996 with "bicycle=yes"). That doesn't seem right to me. Alternativ other routing engines (for example https://graphhopper.com/maps/?point=48.147369%2C17.108942&point=48.145174%2C17.104125&profile=bike) use the outline of the area space. This can be visually misleading — and can occasionally lead to significant detours. Please consider this.
Tomas_J (2026-04-21 11:12:23+00:00): Hi Acemann,

so there is this wiki page: 
"https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Guidelines_for_pedestrian_navigation#Junctions_between_lines_and_areas" 

which contains this text:
"Recommendations
Join together the ways leading to a pedestrian area, to enable linear routing engines to produce (possibly less realistic) itineraries that cross the area."

I understood it as a mapping for the router recommendation. More specifically that one should inside the pedestrian area join the ways which are leading to it to help routers make it`s job. I did it e. g. here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1458261705. It is something simular what Stadtigel did. Regardless his work: do you consider the https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1458261705 correct or not?

I am sorry for writing it here, maybe it belongs to the general chat.
Frans S (2025-10-22 15:02:37+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
I review your work because I was validating on the 27165 project and noticed your (sorry to say) poor mapping quality. Here the same. Connected nodes to eachother. Buildings not squared 
Please improve your mapping skills !!
Best regards
Frans S (2025-10-22 15:03:27+00:00): See my comment on the other changeset. 
Best regards
fortera_au (2025-11-10 03:21:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 174443403 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: incompatible source
Ruslan Fatih (2025-10-23 04:00:08+00:00): Спасибо. Я забыл
catgirlseraid (2026-01-31 05:33:05+00:00): Hi, 

Just following up with this changeset, I assume its an accident but you tagged the tennis courts as recreation ground instead of the area around the courts. I've corrected this now but just wanted to reach out and let you know. If you need any further help or clarification feel free to reach out
Nat Bradley (2026-01-31 12:12:20+00:00): Hi catgirlseraid, thanks for the comment. I agree with your fix, it looks correct to me as it is right now.
EleGlobe (2025-10-22 15:29:37+00:00): Also deleted a old farmhouse destroyed by Cyclone Gabrielle.
rempshaener (2025-10-22 18:43:03+00:00): Hallo,

das gesamte Tagging ist zu überarbeiten.
Hier sind so viele Widersprüchlichkeiten drin: Ein Brunnen, der aber ein festes Volumen hat?
Um was handelt es sich denn?

Viele Grüße
azerim (2025-10-23 08:10:06+00:00): Es handelt sich dabei um Feuerlöschbrunnen. Diese werden gem. ihres Volumens in klein, mittel und groß eingeteilt. Und "klein" wie dieser soll ein Fördervolumen von 12000-24000 Litern haben, was auch min. ein mal pro Jahr überprüft werden soll.
rempshaener (2025-10-23 09:33:10+00:00): Hallo,
wir reden über einen Brunnen, der aus einer grundwasserführenden Schicht Wasser bezieht? Der hat kein „Volumen“ – anders als ein Löschwasserbehälter. Wenn die Leistungsfähigkeit eingeschätzt werden soll, dann als Volumenstrom in l/min. Deswegen verstehe ich weder das water_tank:volume – es ist kein „water_tank“ - noch hat das „volume“.
Oder ist die nach Norm vorgesehene Fördermenge über zwei Stunden gemeint? Das passt dann aber auch nicht; bei 12.000 l wären das gerade mal 100 l/min – selbst die geringste Fördermenge beträgt 400 l/min.
Ich würde gerne verstehen, was das tatsächlich ist.
Und dann schauen wir mal weiter.
Viele Grüße
eggie (2025-10-22 15:53:01+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

De straatnaam heb ik verbeterd en de info samengevoegd met de al bestaande adresnode. In OSM kun je direct op de adresnodes bijtaggen. 
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=173634017
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
DeFra85 (2025-10-22 15:54:38+00:00): Perfekt 👍
geo-d (2025-11-04 19:58:09+00:00): Hallo Imkerei Dowi,
bei Openstreetmap gilt das Vor-Ort-Prinzip: eingetragen kann grundsätzlich nur das werden, was vor Ort vorgefunden wurde. Werbliche Aussagen zur Präsentation des eigenen Betriebs haben hier keinen Platz, daher wurde "description:de ..." von mir gelöscht (mit Changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174210484). Ich gehe davon aus, dass auch der anonyme Hinweis https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5018405 von Ihnen stammt. Da es sich bei der Hütte jedoch nicht um ein Geschäft vor Ort handelt, sondern die Produkte online vertrieben werden, können die zusätzlichen von Ihnen angegebenen Items hier nicht eingetragen werden.
Viele Grüße
geo-d
bartgron (2025-10-22 20:40:50+00:00): Zestaw zmian wycofany:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173646574
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-24 05:54:12+00:00): reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410  and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969  and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169572924 remain not answered

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173700859
Herwescheluc (2025-10-23 09:54:31+00:00): Hallo, akino_germany,
nachdem ich mich in Wiki und Forum etwas eingelesen habe, scheint mir ein Deich quer zur Fließrichtung nicht korrekt. Konsens ist wohl, dass ein Deich an Fließgewässern nur parallel zur Fließrichtung, sozusagen als Überlaufschutz, eingesetzt wird. Passender erscheint mir nach einer Overpass-Anfrage die (häufige) Verwendung von man_made=embankment. Seltener findet sich auch waterway=dam, was ich persönlich besser für "echte" Stauseen geeignet halte. Mich interessiert das, weil ich das Rückhaltebecken-Programm der Stadt Dillenburg (https://www.dillenburg.de/hochwasserschutz/) beobachte und das neu angelegte Becken an der Schelde oberhalb der Grube Beilstein demnächst genauer einpflegen will. Es ist jetzt praktisch fertig (derzeit noch als Baustelle ausgeschildert) und ich warte eigentlich nur auf Luftbilder. Kannst Du dem zustimmen?
Grüße aus Herborn
Andreas
akino_germany (2025-10-27 18:16:56+00:00): Du hast recht, dyke ist nicht ganz richtig, aber das beste was ich gefunden habe das auch eine Wassermanagementfunktion hat. man_made=embankment ist für einen Eisenbahn- oder Straßendamm, nicht für das Wassermanagement. waterway=dam erscheint mir aber auch richtig, der "Stausee" muss ja nicht immer gefüllt sein.
mueschel (2025-10-26 10:03:56+00:00): Hi,
could you describe what is / what is not allowed at this point? The tags are unfortunately not correct.
bartgron (2025-10-22 20:39:22+00:00): Zestaw zmian wycofany:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173646521
OrchidA (2025-10-22 16:54:49+00:00): Correction: Source used was Esri World Imagery, Mapillary
EleGlobe (2025-10-22 16:42:34+00:00): Also changed Parklands marker into a Suburb. It'll probably be recentred to the centre of the Suburb Area when the fate of the Ahuriri Farms area is confirmed.
EleGlobe (2025-10-22 16:46:11+00:00): More so when any development begins in the Ahuriri Farms area. It was supposed to become a Regional Park, but this could be up in the air again given the recent Council Elections. It can't be ruled out yet that it could become a new large Industrial Area for Napier that'll serve the Airport too.
HugoC01 (2025-10-22 16:55:32+00:00): Mon 1er changeset fait avec JOSM!!!
Hufkratzer (2025-10-22 20:18:51+00:00): Hi,
es gibt da noch einen alten Knoten für die Little-P-Ranch: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5580510342. Also momentan sind in OSM da jetzt zwei Ranches gemappt, was wohl so nicht stimmt.
Wegen deiner Änderung vermute ich, dass es die Little-P-Ranch nicht mehr gibt. Aber anstatt den Knoten zu löschen, würde ich vorschlagen, die Daten für die Angis Ranch von dem Gebäude an den alten Knoten zu verschieben, denn die Ranch ist sicherlich viel größer als dieses Gebäude. Ansonsten müsste man die gesamte Fläche der Ranch mappen wie hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/201818660
highpotential (2025-10-24 17:42:17+00:00): Hallo Hufkratzer, bin zwar schon lange dabei, habe aber in den letzen Jahren die OSM Entwicklung und die Tagging Konventionen nicht mehr verfolgt. Du hast recht, die LP Ranch gibt es nciht mehr, Ich weiss leider nicht genau, was ich tun soll, also würde ich dich bitten die Änderung wie Du es beschrieben hast durchzuführen, wenn Du magst
Hufkratzer (2025-10-24 21:06:13+00:00): erledigt in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173735179
porfiriopaiz (2025-10-24 00:48:15+00:00): 

Hola J00SECI,

¿Podrías indicarme qué fuente de información has consultado al momento de realizar los cambios de las etiquetas de los elementos que has modificado en este conjunto de cambios?

Quiero hacer la observación de que estos elementos fueron originalmente agregados por contribuidores profesionales que en su momento han citado las fuentes de información en las cuales se han basado sus contribuciones.

¿Podrías hacer lo mismo?

Entretanto, podrías abstenerte de modificar sin fundamento alguno las contribuciones hechas por otros voluntarios.

Únicamente estás entorpeciendo el trabajo que ya han realizado.

Atentamente,
Porfirio Páiz
BER319 (2025-10-23 04:59:55+00:00): Hallo Openminded320,

das wird leider immer schlimmer.

Die Messstrecke ist kein Pfad, da wo  noch Wege vorhanden sind, ist der Pfad oder Track separat eingetragen. 

Du verbindest jetzt auch noch bestehende Wege mit dieser Messstrecke. Die Fußgängerüberwege auf der Autobahn bestehen immer noch.

So wie es jetzt ist werden aktiv im Routing die Leute diesen Weg entlang geführt. Möchtest du wirklich zu Fuß über die Autobahn laufen?

Hier noch einmal die Bitte, welche du auch schon von anderen bekommen hast. Falls du hier dabeibleiben möchtest und wirklich etwas beitragen möchtest, fange bitte klein an, lese im Wiki und im Forum.

Das was du jetzt hier überall machst zerstört die Arbeit vieler Mitwirkenden.

Bitte denke einmal darüber nach.

Vielen Dank
BER319
BER319 (2025-10-23 05:25:40+00:00): Hallo Openminded320,

ich habe jetzt versucht den Stand vor deinen Änderungen wiederherzustellen. Bitte lasse es so wie es ist.

Danke
fredisz (2026-06-12 13:35:10+00:00): Grüß dich, du hattest vergessen die Treppe mit dem Bahnsteig zu verbinden. War nicht routingfähig. Ich hab es korrigiert.
LordGarySugar (2025-10-23 17:07:06+00:00): Has this business not been renamed to BlackSea Technologies? (https://www.linkedin.com/posts/maritime-applied-physics-corporation_thanks-for-being-with-us-through-the-journey-activity-7341812119610322946-T33U) / the mapcorp website now redirects to https://www.blacksea.tech/ which lists 1850 Frankfurst Avenue as its address. Also, it is not allowed to use Google Maps as a source for adding information to OpenStreetMap.
porfiriopaiz (2025-10-24 00:48:11+00:00): 

Hola J00SECI,

¿Podrías indicarme qué fuente de información has consultado al momento de realizar los cambios de las etiquetas de los elementos que has modificado en este conjunto de cambios?

Quiero hacer la observación de que estos elementos fueron originalmente agregados por contribuidores profesionales que en su momento han citado las fuentes de información en las cuales se han basado sus contribuciones.

¿Podrías hacer lo mismo?

Entretanto, podrías abstenerte de modificar sin fundamento alguno las contribuciones hechas por otros voluntarios.

Únicamente estás entorpeciendo el trabajo que ya han realizado.

Atentamente,
Porfirio Páiz
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2025-10-22 18:42:53+00:00): "Tüm değişiklik açıklamalarınıza “Gerçek yer eklendi” yazıyorsunuz. Bu açıklamadan maalesef kimsenin bir şey anlayabilmesi mümkün değil. Bunun yerine lütfen yaptığınız değişikliği kısaca açıklayınız." mesajını tarafınıza 5 Eylül'de göndermiştim. Cevap vermediniz. Aynı hususta botlar da sizi ik kez uyarmış. Fakat hâlen değişiklik açıklamalarınız değişikliklerinizi inceleyeceklere hiçbir şey anlatmayan açıklamalar. https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=21256322
Lütfen bkz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

club=sport etiketiyle eklediğiniz düğüm(node/13250291393) bir lisenin futbol takımı ise bunun OpenStreetMap'e eklenemeyeceğini düşünüyorum. Bu bilginin https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Verifiability şartını sağlıyor olma ihtimali hayli düşük. Eğer amacınız bir spor salonunu eklemek ise bunun için başka etiketler var. Viki'den ayrıntılarına bakabilirsiniz.
bartgron (2025-10-22 20:44:30+00:00): Wandalizm usunięty:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173646669#map=16/52.79664/21.93779
porfiriopaiz (2025-10-24 00:48:06+00:00): 

Hola J00SECI,

¿Podrías indicarme qué fuente de información has consultado al momento de realizar los cambios de las etiquetas de los elementos que has modificado en este conjunto de cambios?

Quiero hacer la observación de que estos elementos fueron originalmente agregados por contribuidores profesionales que en su momento han citado las fuentes de información en las cuales se han basado sus contribuciones.

¿Podrías hacer lo mismo?

Entretanto, podrías abstenerte de modificar sin fundamento alguno las contribuciones hechas por otros voluntarios.

Únicamente estás entorpeciendo el trabajo que ya han realizado.

Atentamente,
Porfirio Páiz
bartgron (2025-10-22 20:43:30+00:00): Wandalizm usunięty:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173646641
Sebas3 (2025-10-22 18:54:37+00:00): Excuus!
Frans S (2025-10-23 08:38:36+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please square each rectangular building with the Q key while still selected.
And, be more precise in mapping round buildings. You tend to oversize these.
Best regards and keep mapping
user_5359 (2025-10-24 12:53:05+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please use the key "name" instead of "name ".
en-wai06 (2025-10-25 06:42:10+00:00): Will make sure of that next time. 
Thanks for the feedback.
NeisBot (2025-10-22 19:26:28+00:00): Hi MWright22, welcome to the OSM projekt and thanks for your contribution!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish
NeisBot (2025-10-22 19:26:29+00:00): Based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Added Damascus Town Park as a leisure area"
Frans S (2025-10-23 09:31:38+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
You tend to oversize the round buildings.
Please stay within the rooflines.
Best regards and keep mapping
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-04-15 17:36:46+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1189750956/history - to nie jest czasem man_made=bridge ?
P_kawa (2026-07-03 09:31:24+00:00): poprawiłem
markalex- (2026-02-08 18:53:17+00:00): I don't think it is actually under sand, but rather it is removed for winter. 

Description of the project (admittedly when in was only planned) says "Laipa ir demontējama uz ziemas sezonu" which if I understand it correctly means that boardwalk is removable for winter.
https://balso.riga.lv/projekti/vecaku-pastaigu-laipa
HellMap (2026-02-08 19:08:09+00:00): Oh, you might be right. I didn't really think of this scenario - it looked buried like many other similar boardwalks and I didn't really pay more attention. I didn't check Mapillary and the sand looked like it had piled over the boardwalk as I quickly passed by.

I have no idea how to tag this though. Something like seasonal=yes, but I don't think OSM even has season-based tags for cases like this, nor would any router understand them anyway. I restored it to boardwalk for now.
markalex- (2026-02-08 20:35:51+00:00): I new that it was reoccurring, since it was also missing last winter, and then it was back in summer. Just wasn't sure if it is actually buried or removed, because sand level (based on changing booths) seemed quite constant.

Regarding seasonal and routing - I don't think it matters very much. In winter sand there is quite compacted even when not frosen, so same route will be navigable at similar levels.
NeisBot (2025-10-22 18:03:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisBot (2025-10-22 18:03:41+00:00): Just to help illustrate what I mean, here is how your description could look in a more neutral, factual form: "Laundry service"
cubski (2025-10-22 18:13:44+00:00): Updated description to be non-promotional and factual form.
NeisReview (2025-10-26 10:12:32+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/173641551
limes11 (2025-10-22 21:41:10+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM,

diese Wege sind gut auf Luftbildern zu sehen. Zugangsbeschränkungen werden in osm über access-tags erfasst, die Löschung wurde daher revertiert.

Bitte beachten, dass Feldwege, auch private, prinzipiell für Fußgänger nutzbar sind. Wege direkt über den Bauernhof können entsprechend mit access=private markiert werden.

Viele Grüße
MC490 (2025-10-23 00:14:53+00:00): Es handelt sich um eine Private Hofeinfahrt und die Nutzung ist nicht Gelduldet, da es angrenzend öffentliche Wege zu benutzen gibt.
Viele Grüße
Frans S (2025-10-23 10:45:18+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please do not map a whole plot as a single building. Just map each building individually.
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2025-10-23 10:25:37+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
You tend to oversize the round buildings.
Please stay within the roofline.
Best regards and keep mapping