piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse (2023-12-23 12:30:10+00:00): Hello,
By changing this from the tag that people knew about to one that they don't it means that features like this disappear off maps again (or rather - see http://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#18/54.37823/-1.96709 - fall back to be shown as a generic archaeological site).

Obviously these sorts of things becoming more known as defended settlements (often constructed in a "look at me" kind of way).  They are very definitely still "defended fortifications" as well as settlements though.

Is it really too much to ask that rendering-breaking tag changes like this are at least mentioned somewhere first?  https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/general/tagging/70 or maybe https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/help-and-support/tagging/71 would be a good place to mention it; you can also contact any advertised data consumers from e.g. https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/archaeological_site#projects - if you click through to the project from there you'll be able to e.g. raise a github issue.
Best Regards,
Andy
b-unicycling (2023-12-23 19:59:11+00:00): You're right, of course. Please feel free to revert the changesets.
I suppose it was a combination of being frustrated by the proposal process, getting carried away after watching a documentary about hilltop enclosures and thinking I know best. As you might be able to see, I haven't even made up my mind about whether to class them as fortifications or not.
I actually lay awake last night thinking that I maybe went too far, but then I got distracted with something else and forgot about it today.
SomeoneElse (2023-12-24 00:01:33+00:00): I suspect that some of these are settlement first; defensive second, and some (I'm thinking of some of the more extreme promontory forts) are the other way around.
It's definitely worth someone having a think about the tree of other tags associated with "historic" and especially "historic=archaeological_site", because as it stands things are a bit confusing.
https://github.com/SomeoneElseOSM/SomeoneElse-style/blob/master/style.lua#L7126-L7290 currently covers how I'm handling it, but I bet filling in more details in some cases (such as the civilization for settlements) would be really helpful.
SK53 (2023-12-23 14:34:58+00:00): Has this been discussed anywhere? I don't see a wiki page & the tag has limited historical use mainly in Norway. 

I think re-tagging is probably premature, when most people would expect them to be called hillforts (which is well-established even if it doesn't capture current nuances of archaelogical practice.

Jerry
b-unicycling (2023-12-24 02:52:09+00:00): SomeoneElse has already contacted me over it, and I've apologized to him and said he could revert the change sets.

There seem to be differences between Ireland & Britain and Continental sites, according to the talk page on the wikipedia article.

The names containing "Hillfort" will remain which doesn't make things easier for classifications.
Baloo Uriza (2023-12-25 17:30:57+00:00): Name shouldn't duplicate ref.  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145424322
tyfi (2023-12-23 03:23:25+00:00): I bumped a segment of WW earlier today, and this was a continuation of that.
VictorIE (2024-01-20 18:37:01+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1054293220/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1233454614

lanes=1 ? Bus lanes count as a lane.
MacLondon (2024-01-21 00:19:58+00:00): The only lane markings on this section of road at the junction are the cycle lanes.
tyfi (2023-12-23 04:02:53+00:00): I also adjusted some untouched segments with Bing aerial.
Syl (2023-12-30 16:52:29+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai annulé la suppression du commerce https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1599755789 tout en précisant qu'il est fermé. Ça permet de conserver l'historique. Bonne soirée.
Syl (2024-02-19 18:21:30+00:00): Je viens également d'annuler la suppression de deux bâtiments et du centre ambulancier, ils existent toujours !
Vous avez vraiment vérifié sur place ?
tyfi (2023-12-23 04:42:37+00:00): I don't know how they created TIGER initially, but my guess is that 3 looks similar to B especially if they were hand-digitizing paper maps or something similar.
vojtechzaboril (2024-02-02 12:53:14+00:00): Please do not delete tags from roads
Ozisafari (2024-02-02 13:17:12+00:00): Apologies v, and thanks for the correction. That wasn't my intention and must have been a mistake of my part. I was just adding the Bert's Canyon picnic area.
vojtechzaboril (2024-02-02 13:34:38+00:00): Its ok, I already fixed it. Thanks for reaction.
GullibleMappazo (2023-12-23 04:44:53+00:00): also apparently i break something while editing boundaries but idk what it is that i am breaking
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-02 09:16:12+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11445728995/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-02 09:16:32+00:00): or is it a plant?
Fizzie-DWG (2023-12-23 06:46:50+00:00): Hola Linox 479. Por favor, añade comentarios reales a tus changesets: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments. Graeme Fitzpatrick
Moderador, 
Grupo de Trabajo de Datos OSMF
______________

Hello Linox 479. Please add real comments to your changesets: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments. Graeme Fitzpatrick,
Moderator, OSMF Data Working Group
Syl (2023-12-23 11:13:28+00:00): Bonjour, si c'est une route d'accès, "voie de service" est plus adapté que résidentielle.
woodpeck_repair (2024-06-15 22:29:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 152740214, 152740288, 152740274, 152740234, 152740192, 152740169, 152740167, 152740249, 152740178 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions by Hamilton 44/Delta Evas ALL, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16207
TrickyFoxy (2023-12-28 15:39:34+00:00): Кого-кого?
Tayvick (2023-12-23 08:33:19+00:00): And yield*
PanierAvide (2023-12-24 09:53:39+00:00): Bonjour,
J'y suis passé hier sur ce rond point, j'ai voulu l'ajouter ce matin mais je n'ai pas été assez rapide 😅
Merci pour l'ajout et les nombreuses contributions sur l'île 😄
Cordialement,
Adrien.
https://panoramax.openstreetmap.fr/#focus=pic&map=19.44/-21.1856164/55.2874281&pic=fbf4412b-1146-4c59-acb3-72ace13d4871&speed=250&xyz=288.36/-5.75/11
map per (2023-12-23 18:40:02+00:00): Hallo MunichWays,

wegen review_requested: Die Änderung sieht gut aus, danke!
hatul (2023-12-31 18:05:01+00:00): תודה על התרומה. אין צורך לתת שם "גב" זה ברור מסוג הנקודה.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-12-23 09:10:25+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11445879846

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
rhtb0 (2023-12-29 12:27:21+00:00): No, you NoU
Of Course⋯ not
NeisBot (2023-12-29 12:31:48+00:00): Thank you very much for your response. However, I'm afraid I can't quite understand the reaction. Is it so difficult to leave a sentence as a description of the change here?
rhtb0 (2024-01-06 15:09:33+00:00): I used to write comments, but there was a lot of damage due to writing it down, and other people besides me write it down roughly
Of Courese… not
rhtb0 (2024-01-06 15:11:08+00:00): I've told people who don't write description a few times, but I ignore them all and do what I do
rhtb0 (2024-01-06 15:13:15+00:00): 　, 　　　. 　　? 　　　　　　, 　! 　　　　　　​　⋯ 　　　… 　　　·　　　　-
NeisBot (2024-01-13 12:41:04+00:00): Thank you for your response. Sometimes it depends on how people are asked for something. It's really unfortunate that you still don't want to label your changesets with a small note, so that others can better understand what you are currently working on. Perhaps you might want to reconsider your decision?
Yog Sot (2023-12-23 17:15:19+00:00): :)
Langlaeufer (2023-12-23 16:36:25+00:00): Ich hab den Eindruck, dass du bei der ehem. Tamoil-Tankstelle das Dach mit dem Gebäude verschmolzen hast. Es ist noch ein Dach von der Tankstelle oder wurden dort Wände eingezogen?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145430707
ghostrider44 (2024-01-02 10:47:43+00:00): Hallo,

zunächst wünsche ich die ein gutes Neues Jahr 2024.

Bei der Prüfung der Buslinien habe ich einige Fehler gesehen.

Schau dir mal folgende Seite an:

https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/DE/BW/DE-BW-VVS-Analysis.html#bus_638 

Laut Chronik hast du am 23.12.2023 mit dem iD-Editor in diesem Bereich Änderungen vorgenommen:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145430780#map=15/48.7975/9.0629 

Hast du dabei etwas unabsichtlich verschoben? Der iD-Editor eignet sich m.E. absolut nicht für die Bearbeitung von Busrelationen. Dafür sollte der JOSM verwendet werden, insbesondere wenn eine Schleife gefahren wird und der Bus auf derselben Strecke ein Stück zurückfährt. Dann müssen diese Wegstücke erneut an der richtigen Stelle in der korrekten Reihenfolge aufgenommen werden. Bringst du die Relationen in Ordnung?

Gruß ghostrider44
Der Bierpuncheur (2024-01-02 11:50:37+00:00): Hallo, and wishing you also a Happy New Year! I will reply in English to ensure I am clear, as my German is not technically advanced.

Most of this changeset focused on aligning paths and ways, and correcting some alignment issues with several houses and streets. I believe the issue with Route 638 (in beide Richtungen) occurs here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12717930#map=19/48.79399/9.05781 where Obere Ringstraße was split to reflect its actual shape.

I just checked the routing relation and it is laid down correctly on the street. So I guess this is not the issue. I made no other changes to the route other than those I thought were required to split the street and follow the direction correctly.

Please advise so I can make the necessary correction.

MfG dB
ToniE (2024-01-02 17:24:16+00:00): Hi, may I step in here? ghostrider44 asked me for support.

I checkt the route: https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/gtfs/DE/single-trip.php?feed=DE-BW-VVS&release_date=&trip_id=vvs-31-638-1-1-1-R-1-MoTuWeThSu-377-65

according to the Plan of VVS, OSM is completely wrong at the roundabout @ Schillerhöhe. Many ways over there are included twice without reason (between stops 4 and 8 in the linked page). Seems that someone tried to map both directions of the bus into a single relation - which is completely wrong with public_transport:version=2

I'll fix that using GTFS data as reference.

@ghostrider44: die OSM-Haltestellen bei der Schillerhöhe (Robert-Bosch-Platz) stimmen nicht mit denen aus GTFS überein.

Gruß
Toni
Der Bierpuncheur (2024-01-02 19:11:07+00:00): I saw the errors on the roundabout at Schillerhöhe after replying to the message from ghostrider44.

Thanks for inspecting it. I was not comfortable editing the relations, in particular because several other bus routes also go through the roundabout.

MfG dB
ghostrider44 (2024-01-03 15:12:31+00:00): @ToniE:
Vielen Dank für die Berichtigungen. Ob ich die Bushaltestellen am Robert-Bosch-Platz berichtigen kann, weiß ich noch nicht. So genau kenne ich mich dort auch nicht aus.
MfG ghostrider44
Aim311_ (2023-12-25 20:35:36+00:00): Nie jest prywatne, dlaczego zmieniłeś informację odnośnie dostępu nie będąc na miejscu?
Aim311_ (2023-12-25 20:46:39+00:00): Zmiana wycofana.
moje_konto (2023-12-24 01:11:24+00:00): Już lepiej dać foot=no na całym rondzie.

Fragmentacja na mini kawałki powoduje, że edycje są trudne i może to psuć ciągłość relacji. I w tej edycji relacje zostały przerwane.

Dodatkowo na takich mini kawałkach render nie pokazuje nazwy ronda - tutaj ktoś by to obejść dodał punkt na środku dublujący nazwę. Ale lepiej zostawić rondo w jednym kawałku, wtedy się wyświetla bezpośrednio na ulicy.

Złoączyłem ponownie rondo w jeden element i poprawiłem relacje.
maraf24 (2023-12-23 10:10:56+00:00): Na jakiej podstawie są skasowane landuse=construction?
Budowa się nie zakończyła, tylko ruch puścili.
Samuele Battarra (2024-01-02 19:23:30+00:00): Se l'edificio non esiste più va eliminato.
Se ha rilevanza storica si può inserire su openhistoricalmap.
map per (2023-12-23 18:37:40+00:00): I reverted this edit. It looks like a personal bookmark to me.
Nakaner (2023-12-24 13:20:49+00:00): Hi Mahdi Karim,

you are uploading your personal notes made with MAPS.ME to the OpenStreetMap map database. We do not want them. Please find a better way to save your personal notes or your account will be blocked.

Best regards

Michael
MarcoR (2024-01-03 09:23:16+00:00): Ciao e benvenuta/o su OpenStreetMap!

Se si tratta del nome utilizzato dai ciclisti forse sarebbe più corretto usare mtb:name al posto di name (per maggiori info consulta la wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Mountain_biking#Etichette_generiche_per_percorsi_che_sono_adatti_per_mtb,_ma_non_direttamente_collegati_alla_mtb_in_quanto_tale); la larghezza è espressa in metri e 2km per un sentiero penso possa trattarsi di un errore.

Buon mapping,
Marco
mcliquid (2023-12-23 17:19:04+00:00): Hey there,

I have a cool tip for you: keep your changesets local.

Trust me, it will save you a lot of trouble and make your reviewers happy. Here’s what you need to do:

• stick to one area at a time (like a city, a district or a province)

• don’t cross the border (unless you have a passport)

• upload/save your changes before you hop to another place

Why? Because size matters when it comes to changesets. Don’t believe me? Check out this wiki page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for listening, have a wonderful day and enjoy mapping!
Udarian (2023-12-25 03:03:59+00:00): Wouldn’t that mean that ways such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/992722249 would now need to be tagged using the construction tagging?
mpatsevich_lyft (2023-12-26 15:23:04+00:00): Hi, Udarian
My name is Marina, and I am a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. 
Thank you for bringing this to my attention. After I took a detailed look at all the ways connected to the link I edited, I added a construction tag only to I 395 exit based on the reconstruction project and Lyft-owned sources - the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145534625.  According to our data, there have been no drivers passing on this motorway link since December, 21. 
However, I'm assuming the I 395 is still accessible for drivers since there are passes along it. If you have more recent data, we would appreciate it if you could make changes based on it.
Best regards,
Marina
Udarian (2023-12-26 23:42:19+00:00): Looking at the video linked in the change set comment it seams the from way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/87553350 to node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11417293763 on way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/38840376 it is closed and under construction since that seems to correspond to the part of the highway shown in red in the video. So to me that implies it should be tagged as such.
mpatsevich_lyft (2023-12-27 09:38:29+00:00): Thanks for sharing your thoughts on this. It seems that at the moment the info in the video does not correspond to the actual traffic situation. According to Lyft-owned sources the ways you mentioned were driven this week: on average 920 passes per day by Lyft drivers.  Probably it is a phased road closure: at first one motorway link was open and another closed, and in the near future the part of the I 395 shown in red in the video will also be closed. In accordance with our rules, we shouldn’t tag ways with construction if there is evidence that the road is driveable. As soon as the situation changes, most likely we will be able to notice it promptly and correct it.

Best regards,
   Marina
Kovoschiz (2023-12-23 13:11:11+00:00): Please don't delete them directly, as they contain an address, and represents a shop space. Change it to a plain "point" , which removes the tags.
vectorial8192 (2023-12-25 06:08:08+00:00): In theory, indeed, this is how we should do things, to preserve the shop point for the next tenant, etc.

In practice, due to the extreme incompleteness of data (eg all the shop points in the building), I think there really is no effective difference if I deleted the point instead of converting to a "blank" point.
silversurfer83 (2025-06-22 09:13:28+00:00): Hi there :)

I just stumbled across this "meadow" https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1233499169

are you sure this whole area is one big meadow? It doesn't look like it to me, I must say.

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145434547
augil (2025-07-08 20:36:43+00:00): hello, 
the main crop planted in these fields usually are, 98% of the time, hay. this hay gets replaced with short, lawn-grass during spring time and if i remember correctly, the term "meadow" can also refer to farmlands who grow grass & hay-like (non-woody) crops as said in the OSM wiki.
misterte (2023-12-23 17:18:15+00:00): Hi,
wieso hast Du hier den Namen von Martinusstraße auf Martinusstraße -K41 ? Die K41 steht schon in ref und gehört nicht in den Namen. das gleiche gilt für den Namen Reetzer Straße - K41
os-emmer (2023-12-24 16:53:35+00:00): Hallo Edeschnur,
du hast hier ein Haus mit addr:country=de eingetragen. Laut Wiki sollte der Ländercode immer in Großbuchstaben sein, also "DE". Kannst du das korrigieren?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:addr:*#%C3%BCbliche_Adressebenen
Jrachi (2024-08-22 14:54:38+00:00): Nella relazione del D09 è rimasto il
ref:REI=EVBAD090000
Che invece sarebbe il
ref:reg_ref=EVBAD090000
3Pappa3 (2024-08-23 16:54:45+00:00): Ho corretto nel modo giusto?
PS perché qui va il tag ref:reg_ref=? Non mi è mai capitato di vederlo
Jrachi (2024-08-23 17:42:16+00:00): Non correggo relazioni che sono solo nel catasto del VCO.
Volevo farti notare che quel codice corrisponde al codice regionale e che andrebbe reso con 
reg_ref=EVBAD090000 
Tag consigliato anche dalla SOSEC centrale dove esistono già dei catasti regionali con una propria codifica.
In SOSEC Piemonte stiamo lavorando per fare in modo che il catasto regionale adotti il codice REI nazionale.
Nel frattempo su OSM teniamo i due codici. Questo almeno in Piemonte (escluso VCO e Novara per i motivi che sicuramente conosci.
Jrachi (2024-08-23 17:44:25+00:00): Dimenticavo...
Ho sbagliato a scrivere nel primo commento.
ref:reg_ref=EVBAD090000 è un refuso.
Mi dispiace dell'inconveniente.

Ivo
3Pappa3 (2024-08-23 18:13:07+00:00): Ok grazie della spiegazione, ho corretto
misterte (2023-12-23 14:11:16+00:00): Hi,
warum wurde hier an der Straße 51077071 oneway=yes gelöscht ?
Hedaja (2024-08-27 08:29:21+00:00): Hi I saw you added highway=path back to an old path that was and is still set as disused:path which would fit because access isn't permitted anyways.
Parts of that trail are also still just tagged as disused
If it's okay I would set it all back to disused to not have people stumble through it and might get fined for using it illegally

Cheers
Christian
monhiko (2024-03-13 15:10:14+00:00): 孩子/兄弟，用地和建筑要区分开啊，哪有拿社区用地范围当建筑啊（悲）
muchichka_s (2023-12-23 17:04:00+00:00): Той шматок, то не Євгена Маланюка. Центральна Садова починається від Комбінатної. Маланюка - стара сільська вулиця, тому її будинки розміщені досить хаотично
user_20554852 (2023-12-24 05:56:44+00:00): und was hast du hier nun genau gemacht? deine Rückmeldungen was gemacht wurde sind nicht aussagekräftig. Bitte betitel diese doch absofort besser. Vielen Dank
fahrimwald (2023-12-23 21:22:53+00:00): Hallo, der ganze Ort ist jetzt landuse farmyard!
HellMap (2023-12-23 17:01:32+00:00): Hi!

Could you please clarify what makes https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/389409524 a service road? Does it lead to some new location that isn't mapped yet? It looks like it's in the middle of a forest.

Similarly, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/454502769
IMAN SELEMAN (2023-12-23 14:09:52+00:00): I added buildings
bxl-forever (2023-12-26 22:03:23+00:00): Bonjour,

Merci pour les ajouts.  Question : quelle est la source de données pour ces arbres ?  C'est un import de base de données de quelque part ou un travail 100 % sur vos propres relevés ? Ou juste un travail sur les photos aériennes ?
NorthCrab_upload (2023-12-23 16:10:23+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11446363386

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
mtmail (2026-02-17 12:47:56+00:00): Hello

The addr:postcode=3603003210030200 on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9064845911 is too long but I cannot see which part might be the 4 digit postcode or CPA. Is that a different number? 800 addresses have this number.
maro21 (2023-12-24 12:42:19+00:00): Dzięki
eggie (2023-12-28 16:46:16+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
kapazao (2024-01-12 07:09:42+00:00): Hola, ¿tienes alguna referencia sobre esta vía (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1233537444)?
En las imágenes por satélite actualizadas no se puede observar.
Un saludo
MxxCon (2023-12-26 05:59:27+00:00): A newspaper article is NOT a proper website= of a feature. You mean mention it as a changeset source tag, but it's most definitely not this club's website.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145441167
IraGersh (2023-12-27 03:22:05+00:00): How about source:url as a tag for the newspaper article.
IraGersh (2023-12-27 03:23:03+00:00): I looked and couldn't find an official website or even a wiki page.
MxxCon (2023-12-27 05:46:13+00:00): If a feature doesn't have a website then it doesn't have a website. Nothing can be done about that.
IraGersh (2023-12-27 14:15:40+00:00): Ok.
MxxCon (2023-12-26 06:05:05+00:00): Hello.
What is the purpose of this note= tag?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145441366
IraGersh (2023-12-26 14:19:14+00:00): I thought the note: read the history section on the website. was self explanatory.  There is a website and it has a history section.
MxxCon (2023-12-26 14:26:08+00:00): A note is used to inform other mappers about non-obvious information about an element, the author's intent when creating it, or hints for further improvement.
You can read a more extended explanation is at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:note
IraGersh (2023-12-26 14:31:42+00:00): Ok.  Will use that rule going forward and real check out the link.
IraGersh (2023-12-27 02:55:39+00:00): I read the link.  I see why you said that.  So is that text suitable to the Description tag as it is intended for end users assuming there are apps that use Description tags.
MxxCon (2023-12-27 03:03:37+00:00): What use is a description tag that tells people to go to some website to read history about this object?
IraGersh (2023-12-27 03:07:15+00:00): Isn't there a saying about denying history means repeating it.  History is important.
MxxCon (2023-12-27 03:22:20+00:00): 🤨
I didn't deny any history! I never said it's not important! That's completely out of line for you to say that!! 

This is OSM. This is this is a maps database. This is not a place to teach people about history.
There's a right place for everything, but OSM is not intended to be a history lesson resource.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-01-08 00:02:30+00:00): Reviewed Why are you adding east asian words/characters?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145441612