piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
LockOnGuy (2023-06-17 15:51:47+00:00): Hello Muhammad Faiq Kalhury, I see you changed the main name of this district. Your edit is incorrect, therefore I reverted your edits. Please refine from such edits, and next time please provide a good changeset comment and a source.     
Best regards.
kwiatek_123 (2023-07-17 10:59:09+00:00): Nie łączymy landuse z drogą! Później jest to strasznie ciężko edytować.
Hufkratzer (2023-06-17 19:21:15+00:00): Hi,
was du da als Reitanlage (leisure=horse_riding) getaggt hast, sieht eher aus wie ein Reitplatz (das sehe ich auf dem Luftbild), der wäre besser mit leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian getaggt, vgl. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure=horse_riding, Beispiel https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9367533912

In JOSM kann man im Preset für "Pferdesport" Typ="Reitplatz" auswählen (ist leider da etwas versteckt),
NorthCrab_upload (2023-06-17 15:50:17+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10982688234
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1182720474

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
tyfi (2023-06-17 15:49:40+00:00): The names "I-44 East" and "I-44 West" were added to a small way sections seemingly to satisify a validator "name gap check" but these names shouldn't go on the ways. The route relations and ref tags fully qualify the interstate route. The name tag on the ways should be used for when the roadway is locally designated a name.
tyfi (2023-06-17 15:50:48+00:00): Since the bounding box is large, you can find the mentioned bridges just east of the Gasconade River.
Frans S (2023-06-20 12:11:09+00:00): Hello again. I reviewed your mappings on this changeset.
Issues:  mapped 68 buildings, none of them fair squared. Don't you use the building tool ? It produces nice squared buildings.
Please tag every object you map. You missed a few buildings.
And for land use objects, there is no need to add area=yes.
Best regards
ivanbranco (2023-06-17 19:29:07+00:00): Ciao glemco,

qua hai messo tactile_paving=yes e tactile_paving=no a due nodi della stessa striscia pedonale. Da quello che ho capito =yes si usa solo se ci sono indicazioni tattili su entrambi i lati (la quest di StreetComplete infatti chiede: "Questo attraversamento pedonale ha un'indicazione tattile su entrambi i lati?").

La wiki in questi casi suggerisce =incorrect ("On the node of a crossing, if the tactile paving is only on one side then tactile_paving=incorrect should be used.")

p.s. il conteggio delle bici era una stima? io ne ho contate 100 (50 per lato)
glemco (2023-06-18 17:39:52+00:00): Ciao ivanbranco, me l'ero perso allora.. in quell'incrocio, il primo attraverso mappato su osm finisce in mezzo alla strada/piazza, il segno tattile è alla fine dell'attraversamento successivo, non so se il modo migliore sarebbe mapparlo come un unico attraversamento ma dire che non ci siano aiuti tattili mi sembra scorretto..
Per le bici sì era abbastanza ad occhio (diciamo un conto veloce), contando anche il fatto che ci fossero parcheggiate comunque più bici, se ne hai contate 100 allora è forse più corretto aggiornarlo
ivanbranco (2023-06-22 11:25:29+00:00): Hi Christian,

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ase_aux_anses_form%C3%A9es_d%E2%80%99un_protom%C3%A9_de_lion,_Laurent_Magnier_et_Jean-Baptiste_Tuby_(MR3413).jpg

the linked image doesn't exist on Commons, maybe the link is wrong? could you take a look at it?

thanks and good mapping :)
Christian Perrier (2023-06-22 20:24:36+00:00): Looks like I forgot the first letter of the file name in a too quick copy/paste action..:-)

Thank you for the notice!
Christian Perrier (2023-06-22 20:25:51+00:00): I fixed the issue in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137662313
silversurfer83 (2023-06-19 15:14:32+00:00): Hi there :)

two things I'd like you to consider in the future as a curtesy to your fellow mappers:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Thank you, happy mapping and save travels

silversurfer83
silversurfer83 (2023-06-19 15:16:10+00:00): Gude :)

"eigene Erkenntnis" ist eine Quellenangabe aber leider kein aussagekräftiger Kommentar.
Hier gibt es Informationen dazu:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137453535
Albergarri788 (2023-07-22 18:39:40+00:00): Hola, que imágenes has usado para el trazarlo?
ShyShark (2023-07-23 08:10:17+00:00): Hola... No he usado ninguna imagen, lo he modificado porque he circulado por la calle y me he encontrado ese nuevo trazado nuevo. Te puedo compartir el track para comprobar. O sea, que no lo he hecho por imágenes, sino por observació real allí mismo.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-06-29 22:32:47+00:00): não existe um parque aqui, por que adiconou um? e ainda removeu a via de acesso
CurlingMan13 (2024-05-01 08:08:09+00:00): Is there a particular reason you straight up deleted the military landuse area for Offutt AFB?
joelheaps (2024-05-01 12:58:20+00:00): The landuse area was still marked when this changeset was closed.  I only removed a duplicate as far as I know.
Offut AFB Members: 
188857482 (WAY)	outer
1182728522 (WAY)	outer
1182728523 (WAY)	outer
1182728524 (WAY)	outer
1182728525 (WAY)	outer
1182728526 (WAY)	outer

https://osmlab.github.io/changeset-map/#137453932
joelheaps (2024-05-01 13:10:04+00:00): I may have had some misunderstanding on how that area gets imported though.  It looks like its back, and is incorrectly including public-use trails in the military landuse area again.
CurlingMan13 (2024-05-01 13:13:00+00:00): Apologies, after more research, the relation was located.  It looks like that relation was modified about 2 months ago to remove landuse=military.

That relation change (not your changeset) will need to be reverted.

Thanks for the response!
CurlingMan13 (2023-06-24 06:10:17+00:00): Access tags should be used rather than mass-deleting features which clearly exist.

You can read more here on why they should be mapped:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137710101
Andrew Burns (2023-07-01 14:34:55+00:00): I believe that was me who did the initial edit. I was doing a quick edit within Organic Maps and was going to check via the website or josm afterwards to clean up, but didn’t have the opportunity to do so.
alesarrett (2023-08-27 04:06:33+00:00): Vedo che c'è il tag historic:civilization=yes che non mi sembra avere molto senso. Si può togliere?
NorthCrab_upload (2023-06-17 16:40:26+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.

"Osiedle Pułanki":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/262194330
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1063391220
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1063391221
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1063391223
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1063391271
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1063393673
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1063393674
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1063393681
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1063393683
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1063393689
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1063393690
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1063393693
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1063393696
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1063393710
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1063393711
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1063393712
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1063393713
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1063393714
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1063393724

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
felipeeugenio (2023-06-18 17:17:24+00:00): Hola
cuando el número de algo es Kilometro XX, agregarlo como addr:milestone=

y sin el KM. se asume que son kilómetros

lo mismo si no tiene número. NUNCA agregar =SN
Se agrega nohousenumber=yes

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137455043
dzamper (2023-12-12 15:44:38+00:00): To jest oznakowane jako wyłącznie przejazd rowerowy? Czy jako przejście dla pieszych też?
Tomasz Herud (2023-12-12 15:48:05+00:00): To i to
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-18 08:13:57+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10982837029/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
witen (2025-04-21 20:55:50+00:00): It was a duplicate of the police call box.

See this page, "Old Broad Street": https://www.londonontheground.com/post/city-of-london-police-boxes-which-is-your-favourite
Mustermann Max (2023-06-17 17:43:53+00:00): the bycicle lanes had been added with tags but not with extra fields. is it still good to add these? My app didn't show them
MapRobber (2023-06-17 17:52:20+00:00): Esse trecho da via é fechado toda quarta-feira para feira livre. Se alguém puder me confirmar se está correto a tag de restrição, agradeço.
Mustermann Max (2023-06-17 18:22:58+00:00): did I mess here with the relations?? I actually just wanted to add bycicle lanes...
NorthCrab_upload (2023-06-17 18:10:25+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8381975383
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8381975382
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8381975381
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8381975380
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8381975379
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8381975376
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1063393673
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1063393674
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1063393681
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1063393683
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1063393689
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1063393690
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/262194330
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1063393693
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1063393696
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1063391271
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1063393710
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1063393711
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1063393712
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1063393713
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1063393714
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1063393724
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1063391220
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1063391221
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1063391223

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Langlaeufer (2024-06-12 17:31:44+00:00): Hallo yonkyu,
kleiner Tipp, das ist kein Fall für eine restriction, sondern einfache die Schranke auf die Linie setzen und dort die Beschränkungen und Ausnahmen angeben.
Patchanka (2023-06-18 17:37:36+00:00): bonjour
j'ai vu que vous avez demandé une vérification pour cette première contribution :-)
Je ne suis pas sûre de comprendre ce que vous avez souhaité indiquer.
Voilà ce que je comprends, dites moi si c'est ça :
- dans ce bâtiment il y a le resto : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/264383953 
- et ça c'est la terrasse du resto : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1182747740
?
pitfire (2023-06-19 10:00:44+00:00): Hallo os-emmer,

oneway=yes ist ein Linienobjekt und hat nichts  auf dem Knoten gemeinsam mit "turning_loop" zu suchen.

Gruß pitfire
os-emmer (2023-06-19 12:30:30+00:00): Hallo pitfire,
danke für deine Nachricht. Du hast absolut recht, meine Überarbeitung war nicht wirklich eine Verbesserung. Ich habe da jetzt noch mal hand angelegt, das sollte so passen.
muralito (2023-06-18 14:25:20+00:00): Hoia. Burques es "tertiary" por el tipo de avenida que es en la jerarquia vial de Montevideo. Que en el nombre tenga "Avenida" no tiene relacion con como se clasifica.
muralito (2023-06-18 15:20:17+00:00): Cuando se cambia un nombre de calle, tambien hay que cambiar todos los nodos con las direcciones, para igualar el "addr:street" al "name", sino se rompe la busqueda por direccion.
bdentremont (2023-06-17 18:19:18+00:00): Mistaken description carried from last edit.  Actual change is removal of a short road that doesn't exist, per cited sources.
woodpeck (2024-09-22 21:49:51+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156298467 in which this edit seems to have been reverted for unclear reasons.
adlan2001 (2024-09-16 03:45:59+00:00): Kalau nak namakan kawasan ni Perdana Fairways, ya betul. Tak perlu namakan setiap rumah macam sekarang ni. Boleh tengok sendiri dalam OSM jadi macam mana 😅.
alkino (2025-01-05 13:58:54+00:00): Les chemins près du crêt des mouches n'existent sur aucune carte et ne sont pas visible à l'ortho. C'est une hallucination ?
user_2735 (2025-01-13 17:26:44+00:00): Le chemin existe : https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53019794948_d146d6692a_k.jpg
Mais n'est pas très large... Le mieux est de le rejoindre depuis 
Le Pontet (dans l'herbe, sans sentier) et de le suivre vers le Crêt des Mouches
Đuro Jiří (2024-01-28 08:43:27+00:00): Scusa, quale è motivo della chiusura e fonte?
dafadllyn (2024-02-01 20:09:10+00:00): Salve! Non so il motivo della chiusura. In estate, quando volevo percorrere questa strada, era recintata. Forse la strada è stata danneggiata a causa delle forti piogge.
dafadllyn (2024-02-01 20:14:43+00:00): Sembra che questa strada sia chiusa dal 2016: https://www.telesudweb.it/25-06-2023/monte-erice-frana-un-tratto-della-strada-dei-difali

Nel frattempo è stato riparato e ora è aperto?
Đuro Jiří (2024-02-02 06:48:47+00:00): Grazie per la informazione.
Sono passato tre - quattro giorni fa e strada era aperta. Già ho corretto mappa,ho rimosso divieto d'accesso.
Saluti
dafadllyn (2024-02-03 15:56:51+00:00): Perfetto, grazie! Saluti
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-04 01:38:51+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10982926160/history has shop = doll that was added in this edit
shop=doll ? Maybe it would be better to tag it as subtag of shop=toys (say toys=doll) ? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=toys

Having separate top level value for every type of toy seems a bit too much...

Or should we document this shop value as distinct, valid and useful?
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-06-19 12:01:09+00:00): Thanks for checking that water tap!
StefanHRT (2023-06-19 05:03:58+00:00): Hallo,
Ist an der Zufahrt jetzt ein Schild mit "Fahrrad frei"? oder gilt weiterhin der rote Kreis (Fahrzeuge verboten mit Einsatzfahrzeuge frei)?
VG
mschilde (2023-06-19 06:29:02+00:00): Ah guter Punkt. Ich nehme die Änderung zurück und schaue in den nächsten Tagen mal vorbei :-)
StefanHRT (2023-06-19 06:39:30+00:00): Danke, evtl. komme ich da auch mal ran wenn ich im Büro bin und dran denke. Hier übrigens ein Foto von mir vom September 2022 https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?changeset=137457970#map=21/52.52563/13.43673
StefanHRT (2023-06-19 06:42:04+00:00): Hier der richtig Link zum Foto https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=854155355571242&focus=photo
Niels GM (2023-06-29 18:47:46+00:00): Det giver fin mening, men er DAR så ikke forkert? Se fx Holmegaardsvej,  4684 Holmegaard.
osmviborg (2023-06-29 20:39:47+00:00): @Niels GM, kommunen har glemt at tilrette vejen da adgangsadresserne blev ændret. Jeg har fejlmeldt det.
Niels GM (2023-06-29 20:47:17+00:00): @osmviborg Ok, og super at du har fejlmeldt det.
ogk (2023-06-29 21:57:44+00:00): @osmviborg: Hmmm... DAR's kort er i hvert fald korrekt. 

@Niels GM: Super fint. Det burde jeg have gjort - så tak!
NieWnen (2023-06-18 08:52:17+00:00): Nie zmieniaj proszę na `highway=cycleway`. Rekomendowany sposób tagowania ścieżek pieszo-rowerowych, to `highway=path`

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Rowery W tym przypadku S5
Supaplex (2023-06-18 06:01:58+00:00): Hi,

Please don't add stuff that does not exist. Like random distribution road
Taya_S (2023-06-18 03:55:06+00:00): Hallo Rik, 

Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Bedankt voor je eerste bijdrage. Ik heb nog wel even de toegevoegde informatie naar de adresnode in het gebouw verplaatst. In nederland zetten we de meeste informatie in de adresnodes die je in de meeste gebouwen kunt vinden.

Groeten,
Taya
StefanHRT (2023-06-19 05:07:37+00:00): Hallo nochmal, bicycle und foot sind im Access impliziert und müssen nicht separat gesetzt sein ;)
VG
mschilde (2023-06-19 06:31:57+00:00): Ah, danke! Sorry, wollte kein Chaos stiften.
StefanHRT (2023-06-19 06:36:59+00:00): Kein Problem, man kann ja auch nicht alles wissen ;) VG
Maciej9 (2023-07-19 10:33:52+00:00): Co się stało ze ścieżką? Jeszcze niedawno nią szedłem. Pozdrawiam
vladosaro (2023-06-27 07:26:24+00:00): pridal som názov kostola...vedel by mi niekto vysvetliť, prečo ho nenačítalo do FREEmap.sk???
*Martin* (2023-06-27 19:28:50+00:00): lebo building ma mat hodnotu "church" a nie "yes"
vladosaro (2023-06-27 19:36:27+00:00): dakujem, nevedel som. idem to opraviť, alebo to spravíš?
*Martin* (2023-06-27 20:00:30+00:00): sprav prosim ty, a ak sa nepodari, napis mi. vdaka :-)
vladosaro (2023-06-27 20:51:17+00:00): podarilo sa to vdaka tebe :-)
osmviborg (2023-06-18 05:33:56+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_map_for_the_renderer
oijdwaoij (2023-06-18 09:45:11+00:00): Thanks, I'll keep it in mind
tyfi (2023-06-17 20:39:06+00:00): I also added a pair of missing link roads and cleaned up some untouched TIGER roads connected to N.
tyfi (2023-06-17 20:39:56+00:00): The bounding box is extra large because I added layer=5 to a pair of power lines going over N.
bxl-forever (2023-06-17 21:01:01+00:00): Hello,

Is it me or did you just destroy all the work by @Thierry1030 and others who drew the new cycle tracks?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/569441997/history

"AIV Flanders preliminary imagery" is more recent than the default base layer, you might want to have a look to be sure about the location of those cycle tracks.
Der Bierpuncheur (2023-06-17 23:14:49+00:00): I based the edit on my observations while riding over it today, street level imagery on google that was updated in March, and a GPS track recorded with a Garmin 1040. I see the locational error, though, looking at the more recent imagery. I can’t go back tomorrow. I will go on Monday or Tuesday, and make another GPS record of the remaining cycle tracks. One question: it seems that the roads are improperly placed now, as well, based on the most current imagery. Is this my imagination?
bxl-forever (2023-06-19 19:40:05+00:00): My comment was about the cycle track but I agree that there might be more work to do to align the road.
I remember the situation before the roadworks but am not yet very familiar with the new situation in this area.
There is a very active mapper in Vilvoorde whom I asked to have a look too, hoping he can help.
Have a nice day.

(I saw your comment on another changeset here, I’ll try to have a look.)
NorthCrab_upload (2023-06-17 20:50:14+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10979118966

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Ian1234_frog (2023-06-25 20:15:55+00:00): I believe your edit has removed a route designated as a public bridleway (i.e. with legal status). As the route went through a river (via a ford) and across a heavily overgrown field I can understand why it isn't used for routing. However, the routing software should make use of the data available and the data should have been changed to provide more suitable information (e.g. adding depth of ford). Removing a legal route from OSM isn't the way to influence the routing soffware
trigpoint (2023-07-04 18:25:37+00:00): What were you traying to cross the ford with?

The ford certainly looks passable with a horse, tractor or the right Land Rover.

See https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/2980140
VictorIE (2023-06-18 21:53:36+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/520135667

If you look at the 'Esri World Imagery', it shows further poles at the north end.
VictorIE (2023-06-18 21:55:32+00:00): Oh, in the 'Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta' (this used to be called 'Bing') you can see the trees in the wood are much thinner as they approach this pole https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5070457606
Jakka (2023-06-18 08:54:39+00:00): Please edit in one small region @ a time
elavram (2023-06-18 13:17:42+00:00): Ah! Apologies! I didn't know that these will count as one edit.
ivanbranco (2023-06-18 14:11:13+00:00): Don't worry, it happens :) 
Welcome to OSM and good mapping!
silversurfer83 (2023-06-19 15:22:59+00:00): Dear elavram,
even though organic maps is a really nice app for navigating I believe it isn't the best choice for adding information to the map. The main reason is simple: You only get updates once a month (maybe even at longer timeframes). So the information in your app may not be what's in the database.

There are other apps you might consider if you have the possibility of using mobile data: every door, osm go!, vespucci are just three that come to mind.

If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask :)

here are also some chat groups that are always happy to help:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contact_channels#Chats.2Fmessengers

safe travels
silversurfer83
Matthew Newton (2023-06-20 08:56:13+00:00): Hello JaidenV, welcome to OSM - looks like this is your first edit. I have corrected two things with your additions here.

First is the residential road off Heathley Park Drive. When there is a T at the end of the cul-de-sac you need to either use two ways (main road and across the end), or just use one way with either a straight end (ignoring the turning area) or an L shape. You added the road so that it went back on top of itself, which isn't how roads go!

Secondly to do with the residential area you added: it was on top of another residential area and used some nodes of other local features that should not be joined, such as the route of a disused railway. Please be careful to not overlap areas like this. (Also note that landuse=residential is usually a lot larger areas that those used on this estate, but a previous mapper has created smaller areas of houses here - it's always good to continue with what others have done in the area unless you are experienced and know that it is generally accepted to be wrong.)

Are you local to this area? You have made a few edits all around the world - I recommend starting with a few small edits in areas near where you live and are knowledgable about the local area and learn from there. Please join a local mailing list and ask for help if you are not sure!
MxxCon (2023-06-27 21:37:37+00:00): Hello.
Why was relation 15987302 created at all?
As documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations_are_not_categories relations are not intended as "collections" of somewhat related features into one group.

Additionally, as documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Power_routing_proposal/Tagging_similar_to_Transportation_routes type=route + route=power relation type is only in the proposal stage and was never accepted as a community standard.